Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Misc
NT pu,.NNING oEVFt~~ RENTON SE.fl 12 2008 RECE\\JEO BOEING RENTON SUB-DISTRICT 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS City of Renton, Washington May 2006 BOEING RENTON SUB-DISTRICT 1 B ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS PREPARED BY BLUMEN CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FOR THE CITY OF RENTON In Compliance With The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (RCW 43.21 C) and City of Renton SEPA Policies and Procedures BOEING RENTON SUB-DISTRICT 1B ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ E-1 CHAPTER 1 DESCRIPTION OF EIS ALTERNATIVES AND SUB-DISTRICT 1 B CONCEPTUAL PLAN Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1-1 Site Area & Range of Alternatives in 2003 EIS .................................................. 1-2 Current Sub-District 1 B Conceptual Plan .......................................................... 1-7 Current Sub-District 1A Master Plan .................................................................. 1-7 Current Sub-Districts 1A & 1 B Cumulative Redevelopment Plans .................. 1-11 CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Comparison of EIS Alternatives & Current Sub-District 1A Master Plan & 1 B Conceptual Plan ................................................................................................ 2-1 Stormwater Drainage ......................................................................................... 2-2 Transportation ................................................................................................... 2-4 Land Use Patterns ............................................................................................. 2-6 Relationship to Plans & Policies .................................................................... 2-10 Summary Matrix .............................................................................................. 2-17 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 2-17 SUMMARY MATRIX ......................................................................................... S-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1-1 Vicinity Map ....................................................................................... 1-3 1-2 EIS Site Area Map ............................................................................. 1-4 1-3 Sub-District 1 B Conceptual Plan ....................................................... 1-8 1-4 Sub-District 1A Master Plan ........................................................... 1-10 Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis Table of Contents May, 2006 LIST OF TABLES 1-1 Redevelopment that the 2003 EIS Assumes for Sub-Districts 1A&1B-2015 ................................................................................. 1-6 1-2 Redevelopment that the 2003 EIS Assumes for Sub-Districts 1 A & 1 B -2030 .................. . . ... 1-6 1-3 Sub-District 1 B Potential Redevelopment Capacities -2015 & 2030 ................................................................. 1-9 1-4 Sub-District 1 A Potential Redevelopment Capacities -2015 & 2030 ............................................................... 1-11 2-1 Comparison of EIS Alternatives & Current Sub-District 1 A & 1 B Redevelopment Plans -2015 & 2030 ............................................... 2-1 APPENDICES Appendix A -Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-District 1 B Appendix B -Transportation Consistency Analysis for Sub-District 1 B Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis ii Table of Contents May, 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Renton issued the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement ("2003 FEIS") in October 2003. The 2003 EIS evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with redeveloping the 290-acre Boeing Renton Plant site with a mix of residential and commercial uses. In 2004, Boeing conveyed to Harvest Partners that portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site known as Sub-district 1A. Boeing continues to hold title to Sub-district 1 B, which is that portion of the site immediately south of Sub-district 1A. Harvest Partners and Boeing are now proceeding with plans for future redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B. In November 2005, the Renton City Council approved a Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B. Boeing now seeks a Planned Action designation for the approved Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan, pursuant to an ordinance that would be adopted by the City (per the State Environmental Policy Act rules, WAC 197-11-164 and RCW 43-21C.031). Under SEPA, a "Planned Action" designation indicates that the significant environmental impacts of a project have been adequately addressed in an EIS prepared at the plan level (in this case the EIS completed at the Comprehensive Plan amendment and zoning stage), and that the project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The following report contains the Environmental Consistency Analysis for Sub-district 1 B, prepared at the City's request to determine whether the Conceptual Plan for this sub-district is eligible for Planned Action designation. In addition, this report addresses the cumulative consistency of the combined Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan and a proposed Master Plan for Sub-district 1 A. A separate Environmental Consistency Analysis has been prepared for the proposed Sub-district 1A Master Plan and is on file at the City of Renton. Goa/ of this Analysis. The goal of the Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis is to determine whether the environmental impacts of the redevelopment currently proposed for Sub-district 1 B, and the cumulative impacts of the redevelopment plans for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B, are within the range of development alternatives and associated environmental impacts analyzed in the 2003 EIS. If determined to be within this range, the Sub-district 1 B project is eligible for a Planned Action designation. Development Levels and Types. The Sub-district 1 B Consistency Analysis compares the levels and types of development called for in the proposed Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B (and for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B cumulatively) to the levels and types of development assumed in the 2003 EIS. The analysis herein determines that the maximum potential development level proposed for Sub-district 1 B is within the maximum development level assumed in the 2003 EIS for this sub-district (2,258,000 square feet of mixed uses versus 2,570,000 square feet of mixed uses, respectively). In addition, the maximum potential cumulative development level proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B is also within the maximum cumulative development level assumed in the EIS for these sub-districts (3,780,500 square feet versus 5,270,000 square feet, respectively). The Sub-district 1 B Consistency Analysis also concludes that the types of uses that are proposed for Sub-district 1 B (retail, office, lab, and multifamily residential) and for Sub-districts Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 E-1 1 A and 1 B cumulatively (retail, commercial, office, lab and multifamily residential) are consistent with the range of uses assumed in the EIS for these sub-districts. Potential Impacts. The Sub-district 1 B Consistency Analysis then compares the potential environmental impacts from the redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1 B, and for Sub- districts 1A and 1 B cumulatively, to the potential impacts that would result from implementation of the EIS alternatives, as identified in the 2003 EIS. The following elements of the environment are addressed in the 2003 EIS and are evaluated herein: Earth; Water Resources; Fish and Wildlife Habitat; Hazardous Materials; Land Use Patterns; Relationship to Plans and Policies; Population, Employment and Housing; Parks and Recreation; Aesthetics/Light and Glare; Transportation; Noise; Public Services; Utilities; and Air Quality. Detailed analyses are provided in this report for the Transportation, Land Use and Water elements. The Sub-district 1 B Consistency Analysis determines that the potential impacts from redevelopment under the proposed Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B, and for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B cumulatively, are within the range of potential impacts adequately addressed in the 2003 EIS. Conclusion. The proposed plan for Sub-district 1 B is eligible for a Planned Action designation (per RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, 168 and 315). Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 E-2 Chapter 1 Description of EIS Alternatives and Sub-District 1 B Conceptual Plan Introduction CHAPTER 1 DESCRIPTION OF EIS ALTERNATIVES & SUB-DISTRICT 1 B REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The City of Renton issued the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement ("2003 EIS") in October 2003. The 2003 EIS evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with redeveloping Boeing's Renton Plant site with a mix of residential and commercial uses. In 2004, Boeing conveyed to Harvest Partners that portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site known as Sub-district 1A. Boeing continues to hold title to Sub-district 1 B, which is that portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site immediately south of Sub-district 1A. Harvest Partners and Boeing are now proceeding with plans for future redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B. As discussed in greater detail below, Sub-district 1 A is subject to a Planned Action ordinance designation adopted by the City via Ordinance No. 5107 in November 2004. Harvest is currently seeking Master Plan approval for redevelopment of Sub-district 1 A and a determination by the City that its proposed Master Plan is consistent with the previously granted Sub-district 1 A Planned Action designation. Sub-district 1 B is not encompassed by the previous Sub-district 1A Planned Action ordinance. Boeing received approval of a Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B redevelopment in November 2005. Boeing now seeks a Planned Action designation for Sub-district 1 B, pursuant to an ordinance that would be adopted by the City. Overview of SEPA Planned Action Designation Per the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), a "Planned Action" is a designation for a project that shifts environmental review from the time a permit application is made to an earlier phase in the planning process. The intent of the designation is to provide a more streamlined environmental process at the project stage by using an existing environmental impact statement prepared at the planning stage for SEPA compliance, as allowed by RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, 168 and 315. Request for Planned Action Consistency Determination for Sub-district 1A In November 2004, the Renton City Council passed ordinance No. 5107, which designated Sub- district 1A as a Planned Action site and designated "[u]ses and activities described in the EIS, subject to the thresholds described in Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 analyzed in the EIS, and subject to the mitigation measures described in Exhibit A [to the ordinance]" as Planned Actions. The Sub-district 1A ordinance allows streamlining of the permitting process by using the 2003 EIS as the environmental documentation for future projects that fit within certain thresholds. The City determines whether an individual project fits within those thresholds and is consistent with the previous Planned Action designation. Boeing Renton Sub-district 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-1 Accordingly, Harvest has submitted a Master Plan application for Sub-district 1A to the City and the City has prepared the Boeing Renton Sub-District 1A Environmental Consistency Analysis, which compares the proposed 1A Master Plan to the range of alternatives and potential for significant environmental impacts analyzed in the 2003 EIS. Request for Planned Action Status for Sub-district 1 B In November 2005, the Renton City Council approved a Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B. Boeing has requested that the City enact an ordinance designating those uses and activities described in the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan as Planned Actions, based on the range of development alternatives and associated impacts for Sub-district 1 B analyzed in the 2003 EIS. This Sub-district 1 B Planned Action Environmental Consistency Analysis addresses the potential for significant impacts associated with the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan in comparison to the range of environmental impacts of Sub-district 1 B redevelopment disclosed in the 2003 EIS. The Sub-district 1B Analysis also includes an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the Sub-district 1A Master Plan and the Sub-district 1B Conceptual Plan. The cumulative impacts analysis addresses whether the combined impacts of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B redevelopment are within the range of development alternatives and associated impacts analyzed in the 2003 EIS. These analyses highlight any differences in potential significant impacts to the environment under the current proposals, and indicate whether these impacts were adequately addressed in the 2003 EIS, per WAC 197-11-172. Site Area & Range of Alternatives in 2003 EIS The 2003 Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS evaluates a site area that includes approximately 275 acres of Boeing property and approximately 15 acres of contiguous property owned by others. The site area is situated adjacent to the south shore of Lake Washington, between Renton Municipal Airport and the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, and includes the existing Boeing Renton Plant (see Figures 1-1 and 1-2). Sub-districts 1A and 1 B are portions of this overall site area. Sub-district 1A is generally equivalent to Subareas A and Bin the 2003 EIS, and Sub-district 1 Bis generally equivalent to Subarea C in the 2003 EIS. One part of Subarea A, the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) property in the northern portion of the subarea, is not part of the area currently proposed for redevelopment, and is not considered part of Sub-district 1A herein. Four redevelopment scenarios are analyzed in the 2003 EIS (Alternatives 1 through 4). These scenarios encompass a broad range of land uses that the site could potentially accommodate in the future, given existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning policies and designations (note: an Urban Center -North (UC-N) Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning classification were adopted for the site area in November 2003). The Alternatives that the 2003 EIS analyzes include: • Alternative 1: No Action/Existing Zoning (2015 Buildout). Alternative 1 is a partial redevelopment scenario under existing zoning at that time (Industrial -Heavy [IH] and Commercial Office [CO]) and is assumed to be built out by the year 2015. Some Boeing operations are assumed to continue within the site area, generally west of Logan Avenue N. Boeing Renton Sub-district 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-2 • • Alternative 2: Partial Redevelopment (2015 Buildout). Alternative 2 is a partial redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation and is assumed to be built out by the year 2015. Again, some Boeing operations are assumed to continue within the site area. The partial redevelopment to higher intensity land uses would include new mixed-use retail, office and residential uses. • Alternative 3: Full Redevelopment, Low to Mid-Rise (2030 Buildout). Alternative 3 is a full mixed use redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation at a low to mid-rise level, and is assumed to be built out by the year 2030. Some continued Boeing operations are assumed to continue within the site area at year 2015; however, no continued operations are assumed for year 2030. A portion of the overall build out is assumed to occur by 2015. Alternative 4: Full Redevelopment, Mid to High-Rise (2030 Buildout). Alternative 4 is a full mixed use redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation at a mid to high-rise level, and is assumed to be built out by the year 2030. As with Alternative 3, no continued Boeing operations are assumed for year 2030. A portion of the overall build out is assumed to occur by 2015. Tables 1-1 and 1-2 present the redevelopment that the 2003 EIS assumes for the subareas equivalent to Sub-district 1A (EIS Subareas A and B) and Sub-district 18 (EIS Subarea C) by years 2015 and 2030, respectively. As shown in Table 1-1, the redevelopment that the 2003 EIS assumes in Sub-district 1A by year 2015 would range from approximately 680,000 to 1,660,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, multifamily and lab uses. The 2003 EIS assumes that by year 2015 Sub-district 1 B redevelopment would range from approximately 880,000 to 1,830,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, multifamily, lab and existing office uses. Thus, the cumulative redevelopment that the EIS assumes in Sub-districts 1A and 1 B by year 2015 would range from approximately 1,560,000 to 3,490,000 square feet. As shown in Table 1-2, the redevelopment that the EIS assumes in Sub-district 1A by year 2030 would range from approximately 680,000 to 2,700,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, lab and multifamily uses (1,112 multifamily units). The 2003 EIS assumes that by year 2030 Sub-district 1 B redevelopment would range from approximately 880,000 to 2,570,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, existing office and multifamily uses (373 multifamily units). Thus, the cumulative redevelopment in Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B that the EIS assumes by year 2030 would range from approximately 1,560,000 to 5,270,000 square feet (including up to 1,485 multifamily units). As noted beneath Tables 1-1 and 1-2, the Sub-district 18 figures include 480,000 square feet of existing office uses for Alternatives 1 and 2, and 660,000 square feet of existing office uses for Alternatives 3 and 4. This difference in existing office use area is due to the fact that under Alternatives 1 and 2 the existing buildings directly east of Logan Avenue N. are assumed to be part of Boeing's consolidated operations, whereas under Alternatives 3 and 4 these buildings are assumed to be part of the proposed redevelopment (the buildings would remain and would be occupied by new, non-Boeing tenants). Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-5 '•~BLUMEN -~ CONSULTING -.;,GROUP, INC Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Consistency Analysis Figure 1-1 Vicinity Map 0 \ \ I ', \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \, ' I \ ' \ r'J\ \ ','1 \ . \ i \ \ \ \ "7 \ ' ~ \,·. C \',T, \ \..., \ :.. I \,, '1 \ ' ,,. , I \ -;. i '• \ \ ~ I .,, \ ' \ \ \ \ \ ' \ ' \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ / ,..,.,;,,,-.i1 ......... j --.~-·-, e BOEING / r 0 G'> ), z ~ m ::z I I I I Sub-distri 1 A (EIS Subareas and B) I -------p; CQ I~ )> p z I I I I CXl C ;:o z "' ~ ~ )'> Sub-district (EIS Subarea N6 ST § r C )> :s: 'J> z ---, • . \\\ N • \'-------...,..1 o 500 \ \ 2 ~ "O m m r-r r-.... V, -< ----, SC~LE ltl FE ET \ , ... BLUMEN ,!J CONSULTING ~GROUP, INC ),, )'> < < "' m z z N 4TH ST Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Consistency Analysis C, )> ;:o C m 2 ~ m z N 8TH ST Not a Part Sou rce: Hea rtl and LL(, 2003 Figure 1-2 EIS Site Area Map • Alternative 2: Partial Redevelopment (2015 Buildout). Alternative 2 is a partial redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation and is assumed to be built out by the year 2015. Again, some Boeing operations are assumed to continue within the site area. The partial redevelopment to higher intensity land uses would include new mixed-use retail, office and residential uses. • Alternative 3: Full Redevelopment. Low to Mid-Rise (2030 Buildout). Alternative 3 is a full mixed use redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation at a low to mid-rise level, and is assumed to be built out by the year 2030. Some continued Boeing operations are assumed to continue within the site area at year 2015; however, no continued operations are assumed for year 2030. A portion of the overall build out is assumed to occur by 2015. Alternative 4: Full Redevelopment. Mid to High-Rise (2030 Buildout). Alternative 4 is a full mixed use redevelopment scenario under the proposed UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation at a mid to high-rise level, and is assumed to be built out by the year 2030. As with Alternative 3, no continued Boeing operations are assumed for year 2030. A portion of the overall build out is assumed to occur by 2015. Tables 1-1 and 1-2 present the redevelopment that the 2003 EIS assumes for the subareas equivalent to Sub-district 1A (EIS Subareas A and B) and Sub-district 1 B (EIS Subarea C) by years 2015 and 2030, respectively. As shown in Table 1-1, the redevelopment that the 2003 EIS assumes in Sub-district 1A by year 2015 would range from approximately 680,000 to 1,660,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, multifamily and lab uses. The 2003 EIS assumes that by year 2015 Sub-district 1 B redevelopment would range from approximately 880,000 to 1,830,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, multifamily, lab and existing office uses. Thus, the cumulative redevelopment that the EIS assumes in Sub-districts 1A and 1 B by year 2015 would range from approximately 1,560,000 to 3,490,000 square feet As shown in Table 1-2, the redevelopment that the EIS assumes in Sub-district 1A by year 2030 would range from approximately 680,000 to 2,700,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, lab and multifamily uses (1,112 multifamily units). The 2003 EIS assumes that by year 2030 Sub-district 18 redevelopment would range from approximately 880,000 to 2,570,000 square feet of retail/commercial, light industrial, office, existing office and multifamily uses (373 multifamily units). Thus, the cumulative redevelopment in Sub-districts 1A and 1B that the EIS assumes by year 2030 would range from approximately 1,560,000 to 5,270,000 square feet (including up to 1,485 multifamily units). As noted beneath Tables 1-1 and 1-2, the Sub-district 1B figures include 480,000 square feet of existing office uses for Alternatives 1 and 2, and 660,000 square feet of existing office uses for Alternatives 3 and 4. This difference in existing office use area is due to the fact that under Alternatives 1 and 2 the existing buildings directly east of Logan Avenue N. are assumed to be part of Boeing's consolidated operations, whereas under Alternatives 3 and 4 these buildings are assumed to be part of the proposed redevelopment (the buildings would remain and would be occupied by new, non-Boeing tenants). Boeing Renton Sub-district 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-5 Table 1-1 REDEVELOPMENT THAT THE 2003 EIS ASSUMES FOR SUB-DISTRICTS 1A & 18 -2015 2003 Sub-district 1A Sub-district 1 B EIS Square Feet/Land Uses Square Feet/Land Uses Alts. Alt. 830,000 SF/ 1,050,000 SF/ 1 Retail/Commercial, Light Light lndustrial1 Existing Industrial Office Alt. 680,000 SF/ 880,000 SF/ 2 Retail/Commercial, Office Retail/Commercial, Office, Existing Office 1 - Alt. 1,275,000 SF/ 1,500,000 SF/ 3 Retail/Commercial, Office, Office, Lab, Existing Office' Multifamily Alt. 1,660,000 SF/ 1,830,000 SF/ 4 Retail/Commercial, Office, Office, Multifamily, Existing Lab Office2 Source: Boemg Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS, 2003. 1 Includes 480,000 SF of existing office uses. 2 Includes 660,000 SF of existing office uses. Table 1-2 Sub-districts 1A & 18 Square Feet/Land Uses ----- 1.880,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Light Industrial, Existing Office 1 1,560,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Office, Existing Office 1 2,775,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Office, Lab. Multifamily, Existing Office' 3,490,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial. Office. Lab, Multifamily, Existing Office' REDEVELOPMENT THAT THE 2003 EIS ASSUMES FOR SUB-DISTRICTS 1A & 1 B -2030 2003 Sub-district 1A Sub-district 18 EIS Square Feet/Land Uses Square Feet/Land Uses Alts. Alt. 830,000 SF/ 1,050,000 SF/ 1 Retail/Commercial, Light Light Industrial, Existing Office 1 Industrial Alt. 680,000 SF/ 880,000 SF/ 2 Retail/Commercial, Office Retall/Commercial, Existing Office 1 Alt. 2,450,000 SF/ 1.500,000 SF/ 3 Retail/Commercial, Office, Multifamily (1.112 units)' Office, Lab, Existing Office' Alt. 2,700,000 SF/ 2.570,000 SF/ 4 Retail/Commercial, Office, Office, Multifamily, Existing Lab3 Office (1,485 units)' L___ Source: Boemg Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS, 2003. 1 Includes 480,000 SF of existing office uses. 2 Includes 660,000 SF of existing office uses. Sub-districts 1 A & 1 B Square Feet/Land Uses 1,880,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Light Industrial, Existing Office 1 1,560,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Office, Existing Office 1 3,950.000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Office, Lab, Multifamily, Existing Office (1,112 units) ·3 5,270,000 SF/ Retail/Commercial, Office, Lab, Multifamily, Existing Office (1,485units) ·3 3 Does not include redevelopment on the PSE property that the 2003 EIS assumes, because this property is not included in the current Sub-district 1A area, and there are currently no plans for redevelopment of this parcel (therefore, the development area shown for Sub-district 1A under Alternatives 3 and 4 does not include 310,000 SF of office uses that the EIS assumes: and the development shown for Sub-district 1A under Alternative 4 does not include 620,000 SF of office uses that the EIS assumes) Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-6 Current Sub-district 1 B Redevelopment Plan Boeing received Conceptual Plan approval from the City for the proposed Sub-district 1 B redevelopment plan in November 2005. Boeing now seeks a Planned Action designation for their approved Conceptual Plan, pursuant to an ordinance that would be adopted by the City. Figure 1-3 shows the general locations of the assumed future uses for Sub-district 1 B redevelopment (the irregular parcels labeled R -retail, L -lab, 0 -office, P -parking, and MF - multifamily). It also shows the existing office buildings that are proposed to remain (the rectangular shapes) and the general location of the "Right of First Offer" ("ROFO") area, the approximately 21-acre area in the northern portion of Sub-district 1 B. Table 1-3 provides breakdowns of the potential redevelopment capacities for the various areas in Sub-district 1B by years 2015 and 2030. For the ROFO area, there is currently only one assumed development option (retail). For Development Parcel 1 ("DP-1 ") through Development Parcel 4 ("DP-4") there are two development options assumed for each area, because the specific timetable for sale of these parcels to developers/users, and construction and occupancy of the parcels by tenants, is not known. As shown in Table 1-3, it is assumed that by year 2015 redevelopment of DP-1 would feature either approximately 65,000 square feet of retail uses or approximately 428,000 square feet of multifamily uses (535 multifamily units); DP-2 through DP-4 would feature either approximately 450,000 square feet of lab uses or approximately 270,000 square feet of office uses; and the ROFO area would feature approximately 270,000 square feet of retail uses. Approximately 660,000 square feet of existing office uses are assumed to be present in the Sub-district 1 B area in year 2015. In total, redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B by year 2015 would range from approximately 1,265,000 to 1,808,000 square feet of development, including the reuse of the 660,000 square feet of existing office space. Redevelopment of the DP-1 and ROFO areas is assumed to be fully built out by year 2015; redevelopment of the DP-2 through DP-4 areas is assumed to be at 50 percent build out in year 2015. By year 2030, redevelopment of DP-1 would feature either approximately 65,000 square feet of retail uses or approximately 428,000 square feet of multifamily uses (535 units); DP-2 through DP-4 would feature either approximately 900,000 square feet of lab uses or approximately 540,000 square feet of office uses; and, the ROFO area would feature approximately 270,000 square feet of retail uses. Again, approximately 660,000 square feet of existing office uses are assumed to remain in Sub-district 1 B in year 2030. In total, redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B by year 2030 would range from approximately 1,535,000 to 2,258,000 square feet of development, including the reuse of 660,000 square feet of existing office space. All of the redevelopment parcels are assumed to be fully built out by 2030. Current Sub-District 1A Redevelopment Plan Subsequent to issuance of the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment FE/S in 2003, the City of Renton and Boeing executed a Development Agreement to guide long-term redevelopment of the Renton Plant site (in December 2003). As part of the Development Agreement, a Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1A was approved. In October 2004, an amendment to the Conceptual Plan was approved by the City to allow a broader range of future Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-7 ~~I.......__I _ NORTH 8TH STREET I ti' 0 z w :::, z ~ z "' 8 -' R ROFO NORTH 6TH STREET nl1'lfi LEGEND R RETAIL L LAB 0 OFFICE p PARKING GARAGE MF MULTI-FAMILY --PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ROFO RIGHTOF FIRST OFFER Source: Fuller-Sears Architects '•"'BLUMEN •.:lcoNSULTING ~GROUP, INC Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Consistency Analysis I 10-16 I ~ EXISTING GARAGE C') ~ N07 ' 0 A ~ _, PART l North Figure 1-3 Sub-District 1 B Conceptual Plan Table 1-3 SUB-DISTRICT 18 POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT CAPACITIES-2015 & 2030 Redevelopment Areas TOTAL Source: Boeing, 2006. Land Area- Acres c'. ;;/4,9:; retail development in the sub-district. In November 2004. the Renton City Council passed ordinance No. 5107, which designated Sub-district 1A as a Planned Action site and designated uses and activities described in the EIS (subject to the thresholds described for the EIS alternatives and mitigation measures described in Exhibit A to the ordinance) as Planned Actions. In March 2006, a second amendment to the Sub-district 1A Conceptual Plan was approved by the City to reaffirm the overall vision for the sub-district, allowing a broad mix of uses. Harvest Partners, the potential developer of the Sub-district 1A property, submitted a specific Master Plan application to the City for Sub-district 1 A redevelopment in October 2005. Modifications to the plan were subsequently submitted to the City. Harvest now seeks Master Plan approval from the City and a determination as to whether the current plan is consistent with the previously granted Planned Action designation. Figure 1-4 is the Master Plan currently proposed for Sub-district 1A. Table 1-4 outlines the potential redevelopment capacities for the various parcels in Sub-district 1A by years 2015 and 2030. As shown in Table 1-4, redevelopment of Sub-district 1A would feature: • A minimum of approximately 125,000 square feet and a maximum of approximately 171,500 square feet of retail uses in Quadrant A; • A minimum of approximately 218,000 square feet and a maximum of approximately 336,500 square feet of retail and office uses in Quadrant B; Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-9 Fairfield Quadrant A ,, ----··--- ' i liL1",H Bfl-i smru (;.iS~uii',iir'n~Ci'.:)" Tri .C""°'i'lJ· ,c, ~u~ Cm"{," cc:,~, -"'~-· ~11C ·--I , Quadrant B Source: Callison Architects ,.~BLUMEN •!lcoNSULTING ~l';,ROUP, INC Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Consistency Analysis Quadrant C i North Figure 1-4 Sub-District 1 A Master Plan • A minimum of approximately 181,000 square feet and a maximum of approximately 189,500 square feet of retail uses in Quadrant C; and, • Approximately 810,000 square feet of retail and multifamily uses on the Fairfield property (900 units). Overall, redevelopment of Sub-district 1A would result in a minimum total of approximately 1,349,000 square feet of mixed use development and a maximum total of approximately 1,522,500 square feet of mixed use development. It is anticipated that buildout of the entire Sub-district 1 A area would occur by year 2015 (see the Environmental Consistency Analysis for Sub-district 1A on file at the City of Renton for additional information on the Master Plan currently proposed for Sub-district 1A). Table 1-4 SUB-DISTRICT 1A POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT CAPACITIES -2015 & 2030 Redevelopment Areas Retail Land Area -Acres Total Building Area -Square Feet 2015 & 2030 1 B) Multifamily (900 units -~~~-------+--------f---------+----~~~--i TOTAL 46.2 1,349,000 1,522,500 Source: Harvest Partners, 2006. 1 Assumes 100 percent build out of all redevelopment areas by 2015. Current Sub-District 1A & 1 B Cumulative Redevelopment Plans Based on Harvest Partners' current Master Plan and Boeing's current Conceptual Plan, the cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 18 would result in approximately 2,614,000 to 3,330,500 square feet of total development by year 2015, and approximately 2,884,000 to 3,780,500 square feet of total development by year 2030. A total of 1,435 multifamily units would be assumed to be included in the cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B by 2030. Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 1-11 Chapter 2 Environmental Consistency Analysis Introduction CHAPTER2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS This chapter compares the potential impacts from the redevelopment proposed under the Sub- district 1 B Conceptual Plan (and the redevelopment proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B cumulatively) to the potential impacts from the EIS development alternatives identified in the Boeing Renton Plan Comprehensive Amendment EIS (2003) (see Chapter 1 for a description of the redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1 B and the EIS Alternatives). Stormwater Drainage, Transportation, Land Use Patterns, and Relationship to Plans and Policies are the key environmental elements analyzed in this Consistency Analysis. As such, more expanded analyses of these elements are provided in this chapter. A comparison of potential impacts on other elements of the environment from the redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1 B (and Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B cumulatively) to impacts from redevelopment under the EIS alternatives is contained in the Summary Matrix at the end of this chapter. Comparison of EIS Alternatives & Current Sub-District 1A & 18 Redevelopment Plans Table 2-1 compares the range of development assumed under the 2003 EIS alternatives to the proposed range of development planned for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B in years 2015 and 2030. Table 2-1 COMPARISON OF EIS ALTERNATIVES & CURRENT SUB-DISTRICT 1A & 18 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS-2015 & 2030 ~· Sub-district -8uildout EIS Alternatives Current Redevelopment Year Total Development-Plans Square Feet Total Development - Square Feet Sub-district 1A-2015 680,000 -1,660,000 1,349,000 -1,522,500 Sub-district 1A -2030 680,000 -2,700,000 1,349,000 -1,522,500 Sub-district 18 -2015 880,000 -1,830,000 1,265,000 -1,808,000 Sub-district 18 -2030 880,000 -2,570,000 1,535,000 -2,258,000 Sub-districts 1A & 18 -1,560,000 -3,490,000 2,614,000-3,330,500 2015 Sub-districts 1A & 18 -1,560,000 -5,270,000 2,884,000-3,780,500 2030 Source: Blumen Consulting Group, 2006. As is evident in Table 2-1, the maximum development level proposed for Sub-district 1 B is within the maximum development level assumed for this area in the 2003 EIS (2,258,000 square feet of mixed uses versus 2,570,000 square feet of mixed uses, respectively). The maximum potential cumulative development level proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B together Boeing Renton Sub-district 1B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-1 by the years 2015 and 2030 is within the maximum cumulative development levels assumed in the EIS for these sub-districts as well (3,780,500 square feet versus 5,270,000 square feet, respectively). The number of multifamily units proposed for Sub-district 1A by year 2030 is slightly lower than the number of multifamily units assumed in the EIS (900 units versus 1,112 units), whereas, the number of multifamily units proposed for Sub-district 1 B by 2030 is slightly higher than the number of multifamily units assumed in the EIS (535 units versus 373 units). However, the total number of multifamily units proposed in Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B together by year 2030 is within the range of multifamily units assumed for those two areas together in the EIS (1,435 units versus 1,485 units). The 2003 EIS assumes the following uses for Sub-district 1A in 2015 and 2030: retail/commercial, light industrial, office, multifamily, and lab uses; the EIS assumes the same uses for Sub-district 1 B in 2015 and 2030, in addition to the existing office uses. Under the current Master Plan for Sub-district 1A the following uses are proposed: retail, office and multifamily; under the current Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B the following uses are assumed: retail, office, lab, and multifamily. Therefore, the types of uses that are currently proposed for Sub-districts 1A and 1 Bare similar to the range of uses assumed in the EIS. As shown by the above, the development currently proposed for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B, and for these two areas cumulatively, is considered to be within the range of alternatives analyzed in the EIS. Stormwater Drainage The following section is based on the Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-district 1 B prepared by KPFF (see Appendix A to this document), the Water Resources section of the Boeing Renton Plan Comprehensive Amendment Draft EIS (2003) (pages 3.2.1 through 3.2.27), and Appendix B to the Draft EIS. Background The analysis methods and calculation assumptions used in Appendix A were identical to those used in the EIS surface and stormwater analysis (see Appendix B to the Draft EIS for further explanation). In its existing condition, stormwater runoff from Sub-District 1 B (and Sub-district 1A) is collected and conveyed through a stormwater drainage system that discharges through outfalls located on the Cedar River, John's Creek and Lake Washington. These outfalls are identified in the EIS as Outfall #15 (Cedar River), Outfalls #13 and #14 (John's Creek) and Outfall #1 (Lake Washington). Some outfalls serving the site area and the John's Creek Channel are currently over capacity during certain storm events (i.e., Outfalls #13 and #14), while some have excess capacity (i.e., Outfall #1). As assumed in the EIS, conveyance system components could be designed to divert water away from existing overcapacity outfalls within the EIS study area to the extent possible. Two cases were considered in Appendix A, consistent with the EIS analysis for Sub-district 1 B (and for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together): one in which the areas drained by each of the existing outfalls are generally maintained in size and configuration (Case 1); and one in which areas drained by the outfalls are modified to direct stormwater from overcapacity outfalls to outfalls with excess capacity (Case 2). A separate stormwater Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-2 consistency analysis has been prepared for the Sub-district 1A Master Plan (see the Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-district 1A on file at the City of Renton). Sub-district 1 B Peak stormwater flows are very closely linked to the amount of impervious surface area. The current Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would result in impervious surface coverage between 88 and 93 percent. This impervious surface coverage would be within the range of impervious surface coverage estimated under the EIS alternatives (at 38 to 100 percent), and would be lower than the existing baseline condition (at 100 percent). Total peak flows with redevelopment under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would be within the range of total peak flows for that area with redevelopment under the EIS alternatives, and lower than the present day, baseline peak stormwater flows. The stormwater consistency analysis concluded that specific conditions and calculated impacts associated with the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would be consistent with the conditions and calculated impacts associated with the range of redevelopment alternatives analyzed in the EIS. Peak runoff flows from the study area to the applicable outfalls would generally be reduced in comparison to the baseline condition, except for Outfall #1. The peak flow at Outfall #1 would increase in comparison to the baseline condition. However, the increase would result in peak flow that is well below the capacity of the outfall; therefore no significant impacts would result. The peak flows at Outfalls #13 and #14 would increase relative to the EIS alternatives, but would be less than the baseline condition. These increases in flows are attributable to the fact that the EIS alternatives include, at a minimum, redevelopment of Subareas A, Band C, while the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan reflects only redevelopment of Subarea C. Since Outfalls #13 and #14 receive the majority of their flow from Subareas A and B (Sub-district 1A), the lower flows at these outfalls (reflected under the EIS alternatives) would not occur until Subareas A and B (Sub-district 1A) are redeveloped in the future. The peak flow at Outfall #15 would decrease in comparison to the baseline condition, and would result in flows that would be within the calculated range for the EIS alternatives. Similar to the conclusion of the EIS, there would be no significant impacts to the surface or stormwater environment as a result of the proposed Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan. Cumulative Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A & 1B The consistency analysis of cumulative impacts to surface and stormwater conditions with redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B accounted for the total area to be redeveloped, including the redevelopment of these areas with buildings and parking, as well as the development and improvement of certain arterials in the area (see Appendix A to this Consistency Analysis for further explanation). The total area of redevelopment under the current plans for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B is approximately 8 percent smaller than the area assumed for redevelopment in the EIS. This difference is primarily due to the difference in the ex1ent of planned roadway development. With redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B, the cumulative impervious surface coverage and peak storm event flows would be within the ranges under the EIS alternatives. Since the current proposals and the EIS alternatives do not contain precisely the same total acreage, peak storm event flows were also calculated on a per acre basis. The peak storm event flows from each acre to be redeveloped under the current plans for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B would Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-3 also be within the range of peak stormwater flows calculated for the EIS alternatives. Appendix A determined that there would be a significant reduction in stormwater runoff from the arterials that would serve Sub-districts 1A and 1 B, in comparison to the runoff from the arterials assumed to serve the EIS alternatives. This is due to the fact that the arterials that would Sub-districts 1A and 1 B would cover a smaller area than assumed in the EIS (i.e. smaller road sections), and the impervious surface area represented by the arterials would be reduced accordingly. Appendix A concluded that cumulative stormwater conditions and calculated impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B, and the arterial improvements planned by the City of Renton, would be consistent with the stormwater conditions and calculated impacts associated with the range of EIS alternatives. Peak runoff flows from Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B and the arterials would generally be reduced in comparison to the existing baseline condition, and would be within the range of peak runoff flows calculated for the EIS alternatives for these areas. Except for Outfall #1, the outfalls affected by the proposed redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B and the arterials would receive reduced peak flows in comparison to the existing baseline condition, and the peak flows received at the outfalls from the affected area would be within or below the range of peak flows calculated for the EIS alternatives for this area. The peak flow at Outfall #1 would be increased in comparison to the baseline condition; however, the increase would be within the range calculated for the EIS alternatives and would result in peak flow well below the capacity of the outfall. Consistent with the conclusion in the EIS, no significant impacts to surface or stormwater conditions would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B and the arterials. Transportation The following section is based on the Transportation Consistency Analysis for Sub-district 18 prepared by Transportation Engineering NW (see Appendix B to this document), the Transportation section of the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Draft EIS (2003) (pages 3.10.1 through 3.10.36), and Appendix E to the 2003 Draft EIS. Background Trip generation methodologies and assumptions used in the 2003 EIS were used to estimate a.m. peak and p.m. peak hour vehicle trips that would be generated by redevelopment currently proposed for Sub-district 1 B. For traffic purposes, Sub-district 1 B was assumed to comprise approximately 1,478,000 square-feet of new development at build-out. While the potential range of uses assumed for Sub-district 1 B could result in a higher total square footage of development than evaluated in the transportation consistency analysis, the analysis provided a worst-case trip generation scenario by assuming land uses and levels of development on individual development parcels that would generate the highest number of trips (see Appendix B for further explanation). Additionally, trip generation comparisons for the transportation consistency analysis did not consider additional mode split adjustments made in the trip generation estimates evaluated in the EIS, and, therefore, should be considered conservative. A separate transportation consistency analysis has been prepared for the proposed Master Plan for Sub-district 1 A (see the Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 A Environmental Consistency Analysis on file at the City of Renton). Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-4 Sub-district 1 B Total off-site vehicle trip generation of the redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1 B would be substantially less than that estimated for this portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site under EIS Alternative 4 (the EIS alternative with the highest vehicle trip generation). In 2015, estimated vehicle trip generation from Sub-district 1 B would total approximately 648 fewer trips than identified under EIS Alternative 4 during the a.m. peak hour, and approximately 272 fewer trips in the p.m. peak hour. In 2030, estimated vehicle trip generation from Sub-district 1 B would total approximately 1,129 fewer trips than identified under EIS Alternative 4 during the a.m. peak hour, and approximately 799 fewer trips in the p. m. peak hour. The lower overall trip generation for this portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site would result in improved intersection levels of service as compared to those reported in the EIS. There would be no differences in probable significant traffic impacts or mitigation needs from redevelopment proposed under Sub-district 1 B, beyond those disclosed in the EIS; redevelopment of approximately 1,478,000 square feet of new mixed use development in Sub-district 1 B, as proposed under the Conceptual Plan, would be within the range of development alternatives and associated impacts presented in the EIS. Cumulative Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A & 1B Total cumulative off-site vehicle trip generation with redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B would be substantially less than that estimated for these portions of the Boeing Renton Plant site under EIS Alternative 4. In 2015, estimated vehicle trip generation from Sub-districts 1A and 1 B would total approximately 1,897 fewer trips than identified under EIS Alternative 4 during the a.m. peak hour, and approximately 720 fewer trips in the p.m. peak hour. In 2030, estimated vehicle trip generation from Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B would total approximately 3,935 fewer trips than identified under Alternative 4 in the EIS during the a.m. peak hour, and approximately 2,692 fewer trips in the p.m. peak hour. The lower overall trip generation for these portions of the Boeing Renton Plant site would result in improved intersection levels of service as compared to those reported in the EIS. There would be no probable significant traffic impacts or mitigation needs from redevelopment of Sub- districts 1A and 1 B, beyond those disclosed in the EIS for Alternative 4; cumulative redevelopment in Sub-districts 1A and 18 would be within the range of EIS alternatives and associated impacts addressed in the EIS. Consistency with Infrastructure Needs Identified in the EIS In addition to the trip generation analysis, key transportation planning assumptions and infrastructure needs outlined in the EIS were reviewed to identify whether any significant changes have occurred since the Final EIS was issued in October 2003. Subsequent to issuance of the EIS and adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Boeing Company and the City of Renton entered into a Development Agreement in December 2003. Based on this agreement, the City is completing design engineering and will be constructing improvements to the local roadway system that will serve the Sub-district 1 A and 1 B redevelopment area and provide a basic through-street grid system within the sub-districts. This includes improvements to Logan Avenue, Park Avenue, North 81h Street and North 101h Street to be implemented by the City (see Appendix B for more information on the specific Boeing Renton Sub-district 1B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-5 improvements), as well as certain on-site access and circulation improvements to be constructed by the applicants. The planned improvements to the local road system will provide capacity at a level that is higher than required to serve only Sub-district 1A and 18 redevelopment in 2015 or 2030 (higher than assumed necessary for redevelopment of these sub-districts in the EIS). Per the EIS, this through-street system was not required to support redevelopment levels evaluated in the EIS for Sub-districts 1A and 1B by 2015 or 2030; instead, this system was required to support the redevelopment of a portion of the EIS study area west of Logan Avenue N., defined as District 2. Based on the traffic consistency analysis for redevelopment of both Sub-district 1A and 1 B, all infrastructure needs identified in the EIS would either be mitigated through expected trip generation reductions (as compared to trip generation evaluated in the EIS) or as part of the planned transportation improvements to be implemented by the City of Renton or the applicants. No additional infrastructure improvements would be required to support cumulative redevelopment under Sub-districts 1A and 1 B. Additionally, if redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B is considered as a standalone project, in comparison to the cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B, there would be no changes in conclusions regarding transportation impacts or infrastructure needs. See Appendix B for further discussion of the specific intersection, arterial and freeway access infrastructure needs identified in the EIS for the cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B, and the relationship of the current redevelopment plans to these infrastructure needs. Land Use Patterns The following section draws from the Land Use section of the Boeing Renton Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment Draft EIS (pages 3.5.1 through 3.5.17). Background As described in the 2003 EIS, Sub-districts 1A and 1 B are considered part of the existing Boeing Renton Plant site {defined as Subareas A, B and C in the EIS). The alternative redevelopment scenarios analyzed in the 2003 EIS are evaluated against a "baseline condition" which included certain land use assumptions for the existing site area (see Draft EIS page 3.5.3 and 3.5.6 for details). Since 2003, the baseline land use condition has changed in certain respects. In particular, below are two key land use assumptions from the EIS, followed by an update on the status of the assumptions in bold italic. • Continuation of existing utility operations on the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) property (under EIS Alternatives 1 and 2 only). The PSE property was included in Subarea A (a part of Sub-district 1A) in the EIS, but is not included in the current Sub-district 1A Master Plan. Future redevelopment of this property is not anticipated to occur by 2015, and is not considered a part of Sub-district 1A for purposes of this analysis. • Continuation of certain existing office, lab, and commercial uses at the south end of Sub- district 1 B. Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-6 Approximately 660,000 square feet of existing office uses are assumed to be present in Sub-district 1 Bin years 2015 and 2030. Land uses that are currently located adjacent to Sub-district 1 B are generally the same as those described in the 2003 Draft EIS (see Draft EIS page 3.5.6 and 3.5.7). Sub-district 1B is surrounded by: Sub-district 1A with Boeing-related uses and parking areas to the north; single and multifamily uses in the north Renton neighborhood to the south; industrial uses (PACCAR truck manufacturing) to the east and southeast; and parking lots associated with Boeing industrial and office uses to the west. At the time that the 2003 EIS was prepared, the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designations for Sub-district 1 B were Employment Area -Industrial and Employment Area - Office, and the zoning classifications were Industrial -Heavy (IH) and Commercial Office (CO). Subsequent to the Final EIS issuance, the City adopted new Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations for the Boeing Renton Plant site area. The current Comprehensive Plan designation for Sub-district 1 B is Urban Center -North (UC-N). The current zoning classification for Sub-district 1B is Urban Center North 1 (UC-N1). The 2003 EIS analyzes the potential impacts of re-designating and reclassifying the Sub-district 1 B property to its current land use designation and zoning classification. Sub-district 1 B The current Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B assumes a total of approximately 1,265,000 to 1,808,000 square feet of retail, lab, office and multifamily development, including the continuation of 660,000 square feet of existing office uses, by 2015. A total of approximately 1,535,000 to 2,258,000 square feet of the same types of uses are assumed in this area by 2030 (see Chapter 1 of this Consistency Analysis for details). Retail uses are assumed to be located in the north portion of the property; multifamily or retail uses are assumed to be located in the southwest portion of the property; and lab or office uses are assumed to be localed in the south and southeast portions of the property (see Figure 1-3). As noted above, redesignation of the Boeing Renton Plant site from EA to UC-N in the Comprehensive Plan and reclassification of the site to the UC-N1 zoning occurred subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS. The 2003 EIS analyzes the impacts of these land use changes, and indicates that the changes would facilitate an eventual transition in the north Renton area from primarily employment based land uses to a broader and more urban mix of employment, retail, residential and open space land uses. The EIS also evaluates the potential land use impacts of four redevelopment scenarios (Alternatives 1 through 4) that encompass a range of land uses that the site could potentially accommodate in the future (see Chapter 1 of this Consistency Analysis for further description of these alternatives). The principle conclusions that are reached in the EIS with respect to potential land use impacts are summarized below, followed by an analysis of how the Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan compares to each. • EIS Land Use Conclusion 1: Sub-district 1 B would be converted to a mixed use. urban district. Implementation of EIS Alternative 2 would result in the conversion of the north portion of Sub-district 1 B (defined as Subarea C in the EIS) to low-rise office and retail uses; the consolidation of Boeing operations in the southwest portion of the property; and, the continuation of existing office uses in the southeast portion of the Boeing Renton Sub-district 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-7 property. Implementation of EIS Alternatives 3 and 4 would result in the conversion of the entire Sub-district 1 B property to an urban district, characterized by retail shopping, a commercial business district, multifamily residences, and public amenities. Under the Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan, redevelopment is proposed to include retail/commercial, lab, office and multifamily uses. This redevelopment would contribute to the creation of an urban district in the Boeing Renton Plant site area, similar ta under EIS Alternatives 3 and 4, and would, therefore, be consistent with the analysis of impacts in the EIS. • EIS Land Use Conclusion 2: The mixed use, urban character proposed for Sub- district 18 would be compatible with surrounding uses. The land uses assumed under the EIS alternatives would largely be compatible with the existing uses surrounding the Sub-district 1 B. EIS Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 would include office, retail and lab uses in the north portion of Sub-district 1 B. These new office, retail and lab uses would be compatible with ongoing Boeing operations, as well as existing commercial and industrial uses to the east, including PACCAR. Under Alternative 4, multifamily uses would be located in the north portion of Sub-district 1 B. These uses could be somewhat less compatible with PACCAR and other industrial uses to the east and southeast. Under the Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan, future uses are generally proposed to be located in similar areas of the property as was analyzed under the range of alternatives in the EIS (see Figure 1-3 in this Consistency Analysis). However, under the current plan, multifamily uses are not proposed to be located in the east portion of Sub-district 1 B (in the ROFO and DP-4 areas). Law-rise retail uses are proposed ta be located in the northeast portion of the property (in the ROFO area), and mid-rise lab or office uses are proposed to be located in the southeast portion of the property (in the DP-4 area). These uses would be compatible with the existing retail and industrial uses to the east and southeast of the property. Multifamily uses or law-rise retail uses are proposed to be located in the southwest portion of the Sub-district 1 B property (in the DP-1 area) under the Conceptual Plan. Lagan Avenue N., which adjoins the Sub-district 18 property ta the west, would serve to separate the multifamily or retail uses from existing surface parking lats in the Boeing Renton Plant to the immediate west of this area. There are no Boeing Renton industrial/manufacturing buildings adjacent to the west portion of Sub-district 1 B. The multifamily or /ow-rise retail uses in the southwest portion of the site would be compatible with the existing residential uses to the south. Overall, the land uses proposed under the Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan would be compatible with surrounding uses, consistent with the impact conclusions drawn in the EIS. Approximately 660,000 square feet of existing office uses would remain in the Sub-district 1 B area under the Conceptual Plan. These existing office uses are generally located in the south portion of Sub-district 1 B. The proposed new uses under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan (multifamily, lab and office uses) would also be compatible with these existing office uses. • EIS Land Use Conclusion 3: Eventual conversion of Sub-district 18 ta a mixed use. urban district would increase the likelihood of similar changes in the surrounding area. consistent with the City's vision for the area. Redesignation of Sub-district 1 B to UC-N, and redevelopment to higher intensities across the property, Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-8 could generate pressure for Comprehensive Plan map and zoning redesignations for surrounding properties located generally between 1-405 and Rainier Avenue (north of N. 4th Street), currently designated for a more limited range of uses. Overall, redesignation of Sub-district 1 B to UC-N reflects the City of Renton's goals for its Urban Center. Over time, the re-designation could facilitate changes in land use patterns that are consistent with the City's vision for where different types of land uses should be concentrated and the ongoing transition of the Boeing Renton Plant site area from an industrial base to one that is more mixed and urban in character. Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning provisions and individual project review by the City would serve as mitigation to preclude potential future impacts. Subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS, the Boeing Renton Plant site and properties between the site and /-405 (north of the PACCAR property) were redesignated to UC-N in the Comprehensive Plan and reclassified to the UC-N1 zoning classification, consistent with the City's vision for the area within the Urban Center. Further pressure for additional Comprehensive Plan map and zoning re-designations, as a result of Sub-district 18 redevelopment, is expected to be limited. Consistent with the conclusions drawn in the EIS, Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning provisions and individual project review by the City would serve as mitigation to preclude potential future impacts. The EIS concludes that no significant unavoidable adverse impacts to land use patterns would result from development under the range of alternatives. Redevelopment under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would be consistent with this conclusion. Cumulative Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A & 1B Redevelopment proposed for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together would include a wide array of retail/commercial, lab, office and multifamily uses. This cumulative redevelopment would more completely convert Sub-district 1 of the Boeing Renton Plant site to a mixed use, urban district, consistent with the analysis in the EIS and the City's vision for the area. Under the current redevelopment plans for Sub-districts 1A and 18, future uses are generally proposed to be located in the same areas of the properties as under the range of alternatives in the EIS (see Figures 1-3 and 1-4 in this Consistency Analysis). However, as noted above, under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan, multifamily uses are not proposed to be located in the east portion of the property, but could be located in the southwest portion of the property. Under the current Master Plan for Sub-district 1 A, multifamily uses would be located in the northeast (Fairfield) portion of that property. Garden Avenue, which adjoins the Sub-district 1A property to the east, would separate the multifamily uses from existing parking lots associated with the Fry's Electronic store. Park Avenue N., which adjoins Sub-district 1 A to the north, would separate the proposed multifamily uses from the existing PSE substation. Overall, the land uses assumed under the current redevelopment plans for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B would be compatible with surrounding uses and existing uses to remain on those properties, consistent with the conclusions drawn in the EIS. Consistent with the conclusions the EIS reaches, Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning provisions and individual project review by the City would serve as mitigation to preclude potential future impacts. Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-9 The EIS concludes that no significant unavoidable adverse impacts to land use patterns would result from development under the range of alternatives. Cumulative redevelopment under the current plans for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B would be consistent with this conclusion. Relationship to Plans & Policies The following section draws from the Relationship to Plans and Policies section of the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Draft EIS (2003) (pages 3.6.1 through 3.6.13). Background The 2003 EIS analyzes the consistency of the proposed land use designation for the Renton Plant site with applicable state and local land use plans, policies and regulations (in place at that time). The EIS summarizes important elements of each applicable plan, policy, and regulation, and provides an analysis of consistency Highlights of the EIS analysis are presented below, followed by an evaluation of the consistency of the Conceptual Plan proposed for Sub-district 1 B with the analysis in bold italic. Sub-district 1 B State of Washington Plans and Policies The 2003 EIS addresses relevant State of Washington Plans and Policies, including the Growth Management Act (1990) and the Shoreline Management Act (1971 ). The EIS concludes that the City of Renton had adopted a Comprehensive Plan to guide future development and fulfill the City's responsibilities under GMA. The City had also adopted mitigation (impact) fee standards for fire protection and parks and recreation, consistent with GMA. The EIS determines that the proposed amendments to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan would encourage future growth in the City's Urban Center (within its UGA), and would be consistent with GMA goals and policies. The Shoreline Management Act is implemented in the City of Renton through the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program (see the discussion of City of Renton plans and policies below). Amendments to the Renton Comprehensive Plan that encourage future higher intensity growth in the City's Urban Center (which includes Sub-district 1 BJ were adapted subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS. The Conceptual Plan proposed far Sub-district 1B would represent an urban, mixed use development in the City's Urban Center, and is consistent with the EIS analysis regarding GMA goals and policies. King County Plans and Policies Relevant King County plans and policies, specifically the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) (1992) are also discussed in the EIS. The EIS indicates that, as mandated under the GMA, the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan was consistent with the Countywide Planning policies. In particular, the Comprehensive Plan included policies to accommodate the CPP housing and employment growth targets city-wide. The City of Renton also had a designated Urban Center, with associated goals and policies, consistent with the CPP (see the discussion of City of Renton plans and policies below). The EIS concludes that the general policies proposed for Renton's Urban Center reiterated the CPP language regarding the vision and "design" of Urban Centers; and, that the proposed zoning would create capacity for Urban Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-10 Center employment and residential density levels that reflect the CPP household and employment capacity criteria. The current general policies for Renton's Urban Center North area, and the zoning of the Sub-district 1 B site, were adopted subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS. The Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B potentially includes both employment and residential development, and would help the City to meet its employment and household targets, consistent with the EIS analysis regarding the CPP. City of Renton Plans and Policies City of Renton Comprehensive Plan The EIS addresses the following elements of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan: Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Capital Facilities, Utilities, Downtown and Economic Development and Environmental. • Land Use Element. The EIS states that policies in the Land Use Element encouraged a compact urban city with a revitalized downtown that would function as a regional Urban Center. Office, retail and residential developments were encouraged in the downtown area. New commercial and multifamily development outside the downtown would be accommodated in "centers". The EIS indicates that the proposed amendments to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan would divide the existing (at that time) Urban Center into two parts: Urban Center Downtown (UC-D) and Urban Center North (UC-N). The proposed policies that would apply to the Urban Center would establish these areas and outline objectives for Renton's Urban Center that would refiect the CPP objectives and criteria for Urban Centers. The proposed zoning would create additional capacity for mixed use development The EIS indicates that proposed policies specific to the UC-N designation were intended to provide a blueprint for transition of land over the next 30 years into a dynamic mixed use district. The UC-N policies were developed to correspond to the EIS alternatives, and allowed an analysis of the impacts associated with different thresholds of land use and intensity in the Boeing Renton Plant area. The policies reflected the assumed level of redevelopment associated with each EIS alternative and a wide range of potential uses and densities of redevelopment Subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS, the City adopted the UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation and the UC-N1 zoning classification for the Boeing Renton Plant area, including Sub-district 1 B, in November 2003. The City also adopted new policies and regulations to support the re-designation/rezoning in November 2003. These new policies were consistent with those in the EIS analysis (see below for an analysis of the consistency of the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan with key Urban Center North policies). The redevelopment currently proposed for Sub-district 1 B would contribute to the creation of a dynamic mixed use district in an Urban Center, consistent with the intent of the UC-N land use designation and UC-N1 zoning classification. • Transportation Element. The EIS indicates that the re-designation/reclassification of the Boeing Renton Plant area, and related adoption of policies, would increase the Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-11 area's employment and residential capacity. Actual redevelopment would result in additional traffic volumes distributed on the local and regional roadway. Under EIS Alternatives 3 and 4, higher density mixed-use redevelopment would support transit and non-motorized travel patterns (at a lower density, Alternative 2 would not be as likely to support transit and non-motorized travel patterns). The EIS concludes that demands on transportation infrastructure would be dealt with through ongoing capital facilities planning by the City, consistent with the policies in the Transportation Element that require coordinating land use and transportation planning, and phasing transportation plans concurrently with growth. Following issuance of the Final EIS, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan was amended to address potential impacts from increases in Boeing Renton Plant site area capacity (including the capacity from Sub-district 18). Various improvement needs were defined and included in the City's six year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is updated annually. The City is planning new improvements to certain existing arterials and planning new arterials (Logan Avenue N., Park Avenue, 8'" Street, and to'" Street) surrounding Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B to support redevelopment of this area (the capacity of these improvements would be at a greater level than required to serve redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B, but at a lesser level than required to serve redevelopment of the entire EIS study area). See the Transportation section and Appendix B to this Consistency Analysis for an analysis of the consistency of the potential transportation impacts under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan with the analysis in the EIS. • Housing Element. According to the EIS, the redesignation/reclassification of the Boeing Renton Plant site, and related adoption of policies, would generate new residential capacity within the area that would accommodate future population growth within the City. Potential future redevelopment allowed under mixed-use zoning would add to the multifamily housing supply in the City and would be consistent with the Housing Element goals that call for adequate supply of multifamily housing capacity to meet Urban Center goals. Urban Centers are envisioned as areas of concentrated employment and housing, served by transit, with a wide range of other land uses. The Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan could include multifamily housing, consistent with the Housing Element goal to provide an adequate supply of multifamily housing in Urban Centers. This housing would be located in a mixed use development area that also features employment opportunities and is served by transit. • Capital Facilities Element. As the EIS describes, the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations would create the capacity for a range of uses at the Boeing Renton Plant site, and associated employment and housing potential. The EIS concludes that ongoing capital facilities planning related to provision of public services (ie., fire and police protection), parks and recreation facilities, transportation, water and sewer systems and other infrastructure would address the increases in population and demands on services associated with potential future redevelopment. Following issuance of the Final EIS, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan was amended to address phased improvements required by Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-12 future redevelopment of the Boeing Renton Plant site. See the Summary Matrix at the end of this chapter for a comparison of the potential impacts of the Sub- district 1 B Conceptual Plan on public services, parks and recreation, and utilities with the potential impacts of the EIS alternatives on these elements. • Utilities Element. The EIS indicates that future redevelopment of the Boeing Renton Plant site area that occurs as a result of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning would require utilities infrastructure to serve the area. Utility policies in the Comprehensive Plan support those improvements that are necessary for redevelopment of the Urban Center. Any utility improvements that would be made as a result of redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1 B would be consistent with the policies in the Utilities and Capital Facilities Elements. See the Summary Matrix at the end of this chapter for a comparison of the potential impacts of Sub-district 1 B redevelopment on utilities with the potential impacts of the EIS alternatives. • Downtown Element. The EIS indicates that the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would divide the existing (at that time) Urban Center into two parts: Urban Center Downtown (UC-D) and Urban Center North (UC-N). Adopted general policies would be consistent with CPP criteria for Urban Centers that would apply to the whole of Renton's Urban Center. Individual policies and zoning for the UC-N area would support a higher density mixed use urban district. Potential future redevelopment that could occur under these land use regulations, particularly under EIS Alternative 3 and 4, could result in a spillover effect to the downtown area as a result of increases in population (Alternative 2 would be less likely to have this effect, given the lower densities of development assumed under this alternative). This could generate support for businesses in the downtown area and create new types of businesses. Alternatively, some downtown businesses could compete with uses in the Boeing Renton Plant site area. Subsequent to issuance of the Final EIS, the City adopted the UC-N Comprehensive Plan designation and the UC-N1 zoning classification for Sub- district 1 B. The City also adopted new policies and regulations to support the redesignationlrezoning. Redevelopment under the Conceptual Plan for Sub- district 1 B would represent a higher density mixed use urban district with an increase in employment and population. This could result in impacts to (and from) downtown businesses, similar to those described in the EIS. However, given that Boeing operations are continuing in Sub-district 2 (the area west of Logan Avenue N.), such potential for impacts would be less than identified in the EIS for Alternatives 3 and 4. • Economic Development Element. The EIS concludes that the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and related new general policies for Urban Centers would be consistent with the goals and policies from the Economic Development Element. Redevelopment under EIS Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 would include office, retail and commercial uses, consistent with policies in the Economic Development Element relating to expanding the City's office and retail employment bases. Redevelopment under EIS Alternatives 3 and 4 would encourage mixed-use redevelopment in a range of office, retail, residential and community-based land uses (redevelopment under Alternative 2 would be less diverse and intense). This type of redevelopment would be Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-13 consistent with policies supporting a diversified employment base, and expansion in retail and office use. The redevelopment currently proposed for Sub-district 1 B would contribute to the creation of a mixed use development that could include office, retail, lab and residential uses. This redevelopment would be consistent with the Economic Development Element policies related to supporting a diversified employment base and expanding the City's office and retail employment bases, as identified in the EIS. • Environmental Element. The EIS concludes that redevelopment of the site, as allowed by the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and related policies and regulations, would occur consistent with City adopted environmental and critical area regulations. Redevelopment under the Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1B would occur in compliance with City-adopted environmental and critical area regulations, consistent with the conclusion in the EIS. See the Summary Matrix at the end of this chapter for a comparison of the potential impacts of Sub-district 1 B redevelopment on the environmental elements (i.e., earth, water quality, fish and wildlife habitat) with the potential impacts of the EIS alternatives on these elements. City of Renton Shoreline Master Program No portions of Sub-district 1 B (or Sub-district 1A) are located within 200 feet of the Lake Washington or Cedar River shorelines, and, therefore, are not subject to the provisions of this program. City of Renton 2003 Long-Range Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan The EIS indicates that the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations would create capacity for a range of uses in the Boeing Renton Plant site area, including housing and employment uses. Future redevelopment would lead to demands on parks and recreation facilities. These demands would be addressed in annual updates to both the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Redevelopment within the Boeing Renton Plant site area would be subject to the City's Park and Recreation Mitigation Fee policy (Resolution 3082). EIS Alternative 2 did not include residential development, and demands for open space and/or park and recreation opportunities were assumed to be minor; Alternatives 3 and 4 were assumed to generate greater demands, because of the greater range of uses (including residential). All of the EIS alternatives were assumed to include some open space. The redevelopment under the proposed Sub-district 1B Conceptual Plan would contribute to the creation of a mixed use development that could include residential uses. These uses would lead to demands on parks and recreation facilities. The Sub- district 1 B residential redevelopment would be subject to the City's Park and Recreation Mitigation Fee policy. Redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B is proposed to include some level of open space (pedestrian connections between areas of the Sub-district and adjacent areas and newly landscaped areas). See the Summary Matrix at the end of this Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-14 chapter for a comparison of the potential impacts of Sub-district 1 B redevelopment on parks and recreation with the potential impacts of the EIS alternatives. New City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Policies The 2003 EIS analyzes a new UC-N land use designation for the Boeing Renton Plant area (including Sub-district 1 B). The EIS includes a proposed intent and vision for the UC-N area, as well as new policies to support the UC-N vision. Following issuance of the Final EIS, the City adopted the UC-N land uses designation for the Boeing Renton Plant area, and related policies and regulations in the Comprehensive Plan (City of Renton Comprehensive Plan [2004]). A brief summary of the current vision and purpose statements and excerpts from several of the current policies applicable to redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B are presented below, followed by an evaluation of the consistency of the current redevelopment plan for Sub-district 1 B with each statement/policy in bold italic. • Vision Statement. The vision for redevelopment of the Urban Center -North is one of dramatic change as existing low-rise industrial and mid-rise office buildings are reconfigured into a dynamic new retail and office neighborhood. Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other resulting in a more diverse mixed-use, urban scale office, and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. Also part of the vision for the UC-N is a dense employment center. The redevelopment under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would support this vision for the UC-N. The Conceptual Plan proposes that the property would be reconfigured into a new mixed use development. The north portion of the property (the ROFO area) is assumed to include retail development, consistent with the destination retail shopping district pattern of development from the vision statement. The remainder of the property is assumed to be developed in a mix of uses, including office, lab and multifamily uses, consistent with the more diverse mixed use urban scale of development from the vision statement. The Sub- district 18 redevelopment would contribute to creating a dense employment center in the Urban Center North area. • Purpose Statement. The purpose of the UC-N is to redevelop the area at a larger scale than found in Downtown Renton, with a wider range of uses, taking advantage of the greater size of available land holdings. These uses are anticipated to include some industrial-type uses as ongoing within the larger context of commercial/retail, office and residential. The Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan would contribute to redevelopment of the Boeing Renton Plant site area at a larger scale than in Downtown Renton, and with a wider range of uses. The uses proposed for this area include retail, office, lab and multifamily uses. Industrial uses are currently being consolidated in the west portion (District 2) of the Boeing Renton Plant site area. • Policy LU-265. Support a more urban intensity of development (e.g. building height, [etc.]) than with land uses in suburban areas of the City. Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-15 The Sub-district 18 Conceptual Plan would feature a more urban form of development. Building heights are assumed to range from one-story in the north portion of the property to up to six stories in the south portion of the property. • Policv LU-301. Ensure that big-box [large-format] retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban-scale retail developments. Redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B could include a destination retail store. It is assumed that such a store would be located in the northwest (ROFO) portion of the site, in an anchor position. • Policv LU-303. Encourage pedestrian-oriented development. The Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 18 includes provisions for pedestrian connections (i.e., along North 6'" Street and Park Avenue N.) (see Figure 1-3 in this Consistency Analysis). It is assumed that proposed pedestrian features would be further refined in the Master Plan development phase. • Policv LU-311. Reduce the suburban character of development, preserve opportunities for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking standards. To a certain extent, the redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 18 would represent infill, as some of the existing office buildings in the south portion of the property would be retained. It is assumed that the eventual parking ratio for Sub- district 18 would be consistent with maximum parking standards determined by the City. It is also assumed that efficient use of the land would be promoted by the use of existing and new structured parking facilities in the development. The EIS concludes that amending the Comprehensive Plan, adopting related policies and regulations, and developing under the range of EIS alternatives would be consistent with existing (at that time) plans, policies and regulations. Redevelopment under the Sub-district 1 B Conceptual Plan would be consistent with this conclusion from the EIS. Cumulative Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A & 1B Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together would include a wide array of retail/commercial, lab, office and multifamily uses. This redevelopment would more completely convert Sub-district 1 of the Boeing Renton Plant site to a mixed use, urban district, consistent with the analysis in the EIS, and the City's vision for the area. The redevelopment proposed for Sub-district 1A would feature retail uses (as well as office and multifamily uses), and would be consistent with the pattern of development from the vision statement calling for creation of a destination retail shopping district. As mentioned above, redevelopment proposed for Sub- district 1 B would be consistent with the pattern of development from the vision statement calling for a more diverse mixed-use, urban scale development. Together, redevelopment of Sub- districts 1A and 1 B would contribute to creating a dense employment center in the Urban Center North area. Cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1B would feature a more urban form of development. Sub-district 1A building heights would range from one to ten stories; Sub-district Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-16 1 B building heights are assumed to range from one to six stories. Redevelopment of Sub- districts 1A and 1 B together would include destination retail stores (in the east and south portions of Sub-district 1A and possibly in the northwest portion of Sub-district 1 B). These stores would be located in anchor positions of the overall developments. Pedestrian connections and open space would be provided with redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B. Pedestrian-oriented streets would include: Park Avenue N., N. 6'' Street, and N. s" Street (see Figures 1-3 and 1-4 in this Consistency Analysis). The EIS concludes that amending the Comprehensive Plan, adopting related policies and regulations, and developing under the range of EIS alternatives would be consistent with existing (at that time) plans, policies and regulations. Cumulative redevelopment under the current redevelopment plans for Sub-districts 1A and 18 would be consistent with this conclusion. Summary Matrix The following matrix provides a comparative overview of the significant impacts that would potentially result from the EIS Alternatives, the Conceptual Plan proposed for Sub-district 1 B, and the cumulative redevelopment plans proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B. The potential impacts that would result from the EIS Alternatives are listed in the left column of the table, and the potential impacts from the Conceptual Plan proposed for Sub-district 1 B, and the cumulative redevelopment plans proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B, are compared to them. Significant unavoidable adverse impacts are also identified, as applicable. The matrix addresses those elements of the environment that were analyzed in the EIS. It does not address Stormwater, Transportation and, Land Use Patterns, because those elements have already been covered in this chapter and in the technical consistency analyses appended to this document (see Appendices A and B). Conclusion Redevelopment under the Conceptual Plan proposed for Sub-district 1 B, and under the cumulative redevelopment plans proposed for Sub-districts 1 A and 1 B, is considered to be within the capacity of the range of development alternatives and associated impacts analyzed in the 2003 EIS. Sub-district 1 B is, therefore, eligible for Planned Action designation without undergoing additional SEPA review (per RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, 168 and 315). Boeing Renton Sub-district 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 2-17 ,--·---2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment Sub-Districts 1 A and 1 B Redevelopment EARTH Impacts • Redevelopment would require site preparation • Consistent with EIS analysis. • Consistent with EIS analysis. including: removal of some of the existing structures and foundations, grading including provision of structural fill, and provision of foundation support including the likely use of new and/or existing piles. • Deep foundation systems, including the use of • Foundation systems similar to those described • Same as under Sub-district 18. Foundation driven or drilled piles, would likely be required in the EIS would be required for Sub-district 18 systems similar to those described in the EIS for most structures. Some level of ground redevelopment. would be required for Sub-district 18 and 1A vibration would occur with pile driving (see the redevelopment. Noise section). • Significant erosion and landslide impacts after • Consistent with EIS analysis, because erosion • Same as under Sub-district 18 for cumulative redevelopment would not be anticipated; and landslide impacts would not be anticipated, 1A and 18 redevelopment. ' impacts associated with seismic hazards and mitigation measures similar to those I (liquefaction) would not be anticipated with identified in the EIS would be implemented · implementation of proposed mitigation relative to seismic hazards. i measures. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • Implementation of the redevelopment • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because • Same as under Sub-district 18 for cumulative alternatives would alter the site area through mitigation measures similar to those identified 1A and 18 redevelopment. construction of new roads, utilities and in the EIS would be implemented. structures. With implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts from the redevelopment alternatives would be anticipated. ~WATER RESOURCES ·-·--------+----------------+------------------1 Impacts Surface Water Quality • Redevelopment would expose erodible soils to • Consistent with EIS analysis, because existing i • Same as under Sub-District 1 8 for cumulative varying degrees; however, the increased site soil conditions are the same as described 1A and 18 redevelopment. erosion risk from redevelooment would be in the EIS and TESCP measures similar to Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-1 Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 18 Redevelopment Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelopment much less than for many other construction those identified in the EIS would be employed. sites, because the site area is already developed and covered in impervious surfaces. With proper implementation of required TESCP measures, erosion impacts would not be i anticipated. • During construction, unintended release of • Consistent with EIS analysis, because • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative fuels, oil, or hydraulic fluid could contaminate construction site control measures and spill 1A and 1 B redevelopment. soils and ultimately migrate to groundwater or response planning similar to that identified in into nearby surface water resources. Such the EIS would be implemented. water quality impacts would typically be prevented with adequate construction site control measures and spill response planning. ~--Stormwater runoff during construction would • Consistent with EIS analysis, because TESCP • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative ultimately be directed to the Cedar River, measures similar to those identified in the EIS 1A and 1 B redevelopment. 1 John's Creek and Lake Washington, and could would be implemented. result in a local rise in turbidity near the . discharge locations. With proper implementation of required TESCP measures, no significant water quality impacts to these water bodies would occur. • Impervious surfaces within the site area would • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because water • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative be subject to water quality treatment under quality treatment similar to that described in the 1A and 1 B redevelopment. , Alternatives 2, 3 and 4, compared to no EIS would be implemented (see Appendix A assumed water quality facilities under the for more information on stormwater impacts ' existing/baseline condition. Water quality from 1 B redevelopment). , parameters in the stormwater discharge to Lake Washington, the Cedar River and John's Creek would improve relative to the existing/baseline condition. Groundwater • Recharge to the aquifer beneath the site area • Consistent with the EIS analysis, because the • Same as under Sub-District 1 B for cumulative from direct precipitation is considered minimal majority of groundwater recharge would 1A and 1 B redevelopment. with the majority of recharge originating from continue to originate from off-site areas. off-site areas. The potential for adverse impacts to groundwater recharge from redevelopment is considered to be very low and not siQnificant. Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-2 Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment • Dewatering would likely be required for the • Consistent with EIS analysis, because existing placement of new utilities and other excavation. groundwater conditions are the same as If groundwater levels are significantly described in the EIS, and mitigation measures decreased, ground settlement could result that similar to those identified in the EIS would be may impact existing fences, buildings, implemented. bulkheads, or other nearby structures. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would preclude these impacts. Dewatering would not be expected to produce silty or turbid water, with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • Future redevelopment of the site area would • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because new result in the construction of new water quality water quality treatment facilities would be treatment facilities that would meet current constructed and conditions would improve applicable standards. Compliance with such relative to the existing/baseline condition. standards would result in an improvement in water quality and localized drainage conditions, relative to the existing/baseline condition. With implementation of mitigation measures, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts would be expected. ' FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT Impacts Shoreline Habitat and Fisheries • Under Alternatives 3 and 4, construction could • Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub- occur near Lake Washington, and potential District 1 B is located at a distance from these water quality and aquatic habitat impacts could water bodies and habitat, and TESC measures result. The potential for impacts to aquatic similar to those described in the EIS would be habitat in Lake Washington, Cedar River and implemented. John's Creek would be lower for Alternatives 1 and 2 because construction work would occur at greater distances from these water bodies. With implementation of TESC measures, significant impacts would not be expected. • No post-construction/operational impacts to • Consistent with EIS analysis, because new aauatic habitat in Lake Washinaton, the Cedar water aualitv treatment would be implemented Boeing Renton Sub-District 1B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-3 Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelopment • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative ' 1A and 1 B redevelopment. • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. -· - : I i • Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub-I districts 1A and 1 B are located at a distance from these water bodies and habitat, and TESC measures similar to those described in the EIS would be implemented. • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. .. Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 18 Redevelopment River and John's Creek would be expected due and conditions would improve relative to the to increased stormwater quality treatment existing baseline condition. associated with redevelopment relative to the existing/baseline condition. Upland Habitat and Wildlife • Temporary, minor construction-related impacts • Consistent with EIS analysis, because existing to wildlife habitat could occur. However, wildlife conditions continue to be limited and of existing habitat is limited and of poor quality, poor quality. and its temporary loss (until re-landscaped) is not expected to have any significant adverse effects on wildlife. • At full buildout of Alternatives 3 and 4, open • Consistent with EIS analysis, because open space is expected to increase relative to the space and landscaping would increase relative existing/baseline condition (less open space to existing conditions with redevelopment would be provided under Alternative 2). This assumed for Sub-district 18. increase in open space would increase wildlife habitat. -Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because fish fish or wildlife resources would be expected to and wildlife habitat continues to be limited and occur from the redevelopment under any of the of poor quality, TESC measures and other EIS alternatives. (This is primarily due to the BMPs similar to those identified in the EIS existing lack of any significant fish or wildlife would be implemented and improved habitat or fish or wildlife use of the site area; the stormwater quality would result. lack of any in-water work assumed for redevelopment; with implementation of typical temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures (TESC) and other best management practices (BMPs), construction could be completed without adversely affecting nearby watercourses; and improved stormwater quality treatment prior to discharge to the Cedar River, Lake Washington, and John's Creek from all redeveloped areas.) Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-4 Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelopment I • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1 A and 1 B redevelopment. I • Consistent with EIS analysis, because open space and landscaping would increase relative to existing conditions with redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together. -- • Same as under Sub-district 18 for cumulative 1A and 18 redevelopment. -· Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 18 Redevelopment HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Impacts • Any need for further investigations, associated • Consistent with EIS analysis. with future redevelopment in the site area, as well as any subsequent remedial actions, would be determined as part of the Corrective Action process or state Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) process. - • If proposals for redevelopment to different, non-• Consistent with EIS analysis. Assumed industrial land uses are submitted in the future, redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B would include the MTCA process would address appropriate non-industrial uses similar to those identified in cleanup levels at that time, based on the land the EIS, and cleanup measures similar to those use proposed for a specific area. identified in the EIS would be implemented, if necessary. • There would be the potential for new areas of • Consistent with EIS analysis, because, as contamination to be identified, in Subareas A necessary, investigations and cleanup similar through C, in addition to the one area of known to that identified in the EIS would be contamination at the southeast corner of the 10-undertaken. 50 complex (Subarea B), as buildings are demolished and pavement is removed for new construction in the future. If such areas are identified they would be investigated, and if necessary, cleaned up, according to MTCA regulations (WAC 173-340) or the conditions of the Agreed Order. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • No unavoidable adverse impacts from the • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because future redevelopment under any of the remedial actions similar to those identified in alternatives would be expected. the EIS would be undertaken, as warranted. POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING Impacts • No population would be added to the site area • New population could be generated in Sub- under Alternative 2. At full buildout in 2030. district 1 B in year 2015. Population generated population capacity of the site area could be in Sub-district 1 B would be approximately 963 about 7,300 people under Alternative 3 and based on a person per household ratio of 1.8 9,200 under Alternative 4. This population and a 100 percent occupancy rate. This Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-5 Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelopment ! • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. I ! • Consistent with EIS analysis. Redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together would both include non-industrial uses similar to those identified in the EIS, and cleanup measures similar to those identified in the EIS would be implemented, if necessary. • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. ··---- • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. -. • Population generated cumulatively by redevelopment in Sub-districts 1A and 1 B could be approximately 2,600. This population would be within the range estimated in the EIS. - Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 18 Redevelopment Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelopment I growth would represent between 37 and 47 population would be within the range estimated · ~ percent of forecasted growth that is projected to in the EIS. occur in the overall Renton/Skyway Forecast 1 Analysis Zone (FAZ) Group between 2000 and 2030. • New employment capacity and associated • Consistent with the EIS analysis, because the • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative indirect employment would likely generate potential for new employment capacity and 1A and 1 B redevelopment. increases in population to the City of Renton associated indirect employment to generate over the 25-year build out period. increases in population to the City of Renton would be within levels identified in the EIS. Employment • At full buildout in 2015, total employment • New employment capacity in Sub-district 1 B at • New employment capacity generated capacity in the entire Renton Plant site area partial buildout in year 2015 would be up to cumulatively by the current redevelopment under Alternative 2 would be about 14,700 and about 2,000, based on ULI standards used in plans for Sub-districts 1A and 1 B would be up to would account for 18 percent of total projected the EIS. New employment capacity in Sub-about 3,850 in 2015, and would be within the employment in the overall Renton/Skyway FAZ district 1B at full buildout in 2030 would be up to range estimated in the EIS. Group. At full buildout in 2030, total about 3,200. New employment capacity in 2015 employment capacity under Alternatives 3 and and 2030 would be within the range estimated 4 would be about 23,700 and 41,400, in the EIS. respectively, and would account for 25 and 43 percent of total projected employment in the I overall Renton/Skyway FAZ Group. Without , existing Boeing employees, total new ' employment would be 3,500 under Alternative 2, 4,400 under Alternative 3 and 7,900 under Alternative 4. • By 2030, redevelopment would result in a • Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub-• Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub- transition in the employment base within the district 1 B is assumed to be redeveloped as an districts 1A and 1 B together would be site area from industrial/manufacturing to the urban mixed-use development. redeveloped as urban mixed-use developments. services sector (potentially including jobs in the retail, "finance, insurance, real estate and services", and government/education employment sectors). .The new mix of g_ of jobs associated with redevelopment in new I retail, office, lab, hotel and residential uses. I Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-6 Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment • Jobs created within the site area would • Consistent with EIS analysis, because jobs generate secondary and induced (indirect} similar to those described in the EIS would be employment that could result in increased local created, with the potential to generate and regional economic activity. secondary and induced employment. ·---· Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to • Consistent with the EIS conclusion. population, housing and employment would occur as a result of the redevelopment alternatives, as analyzed. PARKS AND RECREATION Impacts • Increase in demand on park and recreation • Consistent with EIS analysis. facilities would result from future redevelopment. Mitigation would include capital facilities planning by the City, provision of on- site open space and compliance with the City's Park and Recreation Mitigation Fee Policy for residential projects. • It is assumed that redevelopment would include • Similar to EIS analysis, because it is assumed new open space, a portion of which would be that some level of open space (landscaped available to the public, with a mix of active and area and potentially open space as part of passive recreational features. Under residential development} would be provided Alternative 2, it is assumed that approximately with redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B. two acres of new open space (consisting of landscaped area} would be provided. • Construction-related impacts could include • Sub-district 1 B is not located adjacent to these temporary increases in noise and dust levels at park and recreation facilities, and construction the Cedar River Trail, new Sam Chastain in Sub-district 1 B would not adversely affect Waterfront Trail, and Gene Coulon Park; them. however, these increases would be temporary in nature, likely of short duration and not significant. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • With implementation of mitigation measures, no • Consistent with the EIS conclusion, because significant unavoidable adverse impacts to park similar mitigation measures to those identified in Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-7 Sub-Districts 1 A and 1 B Redevelopment • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1 A and 1 B redevelopment. ' ' • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative ' 1A and 1 B redevelopment. ·- • Consistent with EIS analysis. I I • Similar to EIS analysis, because open space would be provided with redevelopment of Sub- districts 1A and 1 B (including landscaped area, courtyards/plazas and open space in residential areas}. • Sub-districts 1A and 1B are not located adjacent to these park and recreation facilities, and construction on these properties would not adversely affect them. I • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment and recreation facilities from the redevelopment the EIS would be implemented. scenarios, as analyzed, would be expected. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE Impacts I • Views to the site area from adjacent areas • Similar to EIS analysis, views to Sub-District would substantially change. 1 B would change with redevelopment of that property. • The visual character of the site area would be , • Consistent with EIS analysis, the visual substantially changed. Buildings could be I character of Sub-district 1B would be located along the street edge, encouraging substantially changed. It is assumed that increased pedestrian activity. Street-level retail redevelopment would represent an urban scale spaces could be included in some mixed use and character. buildings, and parking areas could be hidden I from street view, representing an urban scale and character. • New sources of light and glare would be • Similar to the EIS analysis, because primarily from vehicular traffic, parking areas redevelopment assumed for Sub-district 1 B and street lighting, and interior and exterior would create new sources of light and glare building lighting. Light and glare would also similar to those described in the EIS. However, likely increase near the Lake Washington light and glare would not increase substantially ' shoreline. near Lake Washington, because of the distance between Sub-district 1B and the shoreline. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to I • Consistent with EIS conclusion. aesthetic, light and glare conditions would occur. NOISE Impacts • Noise associated with the demolition of existing • Consistent with EIS analysis. Noise would structures, parking area removal, building generally be limited to the Sub-District 1 B construction, truck traffic to and from building property and immediately surrounding area. sties, and the operation of heavy equipment Noise-sensitive receptors would include the and support vehicles in the site area, would residential uses to the south of the property. increase noise levels adjacent to the site area Construction mitigation measures similar to Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis May, 2006 S-8 Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelo_JJ_ment • Similar to EIS analysis, views to Sub-districts 1A and 1 B would change with redevelopment of those properties. • Consistent with EIS analysis, the visual character of Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together would be substantially changed. Redevelopment would represent an urban ! scale and character, and would include design , features to encourage pedestrian activity. • Similar to the EIS analysis, because redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and 1B would create new sources of light and glare similar to those described in the EIS. However. light and glare would not increase substantially near Lake Washington, because of the distance between Sub-districts 1A and 1 B and the shoreline. - • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1 A and 1 B redevelopment. • Consistent with EIS analysis. Noise would generally be limited to the Sub-District 1A and 1B properties and immediately surrounding area. Noise sensitive receptors would include the residential uses to the south of Sub-district 1B. Construction mitigation measures similar Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment over the duration of the construction process. those identified in the EIS would be Locations immediately adjacent to the site area implemented, and no significant impacts would could experience brief sound levels exceeding result. 110 dBA during pile driving. The majority of noise-sensitive receptors (existing residences) would experience lower noise levels due to the distance from the site area. Noise associated with demolition and construction traffic would be I of shorter duration under Alternative 2. , ------- • Increases in the sound level from operation of • Consistent with EIS analysis, because the building mechanical equipment after level of development assumed for Sub-district redevelopment would be between 4 dBA and 6 1 B would fall within the range of development dBA above baseline levels at some analysis assumed for this area in the EIS. Also, locations under Alternatives 3 and 4, standard noise reduction mitigation measures respectively, representing a small to moderate similar to those identified in the EIS would be increase. Under both baseline conditions implemented. (without redevelopment) and with redevelopment, sound levels would exceed City of Renton allowable daytime noise limits at some locations, and the nighttime noise limit at all analysis locations; however, with implementation of standard noise reduction mitigation measures, no significant impacts would be expected. Sound level increases from operation of building mechanical equipment would be slightly lower under Alternative 2. i I • Increases in traffic noise levels above baseline • Consistent with EIS analysis, because vehicle I conditions (generally within 2 dBA) would be trip generation would be within the range I small or imperceptible at the more sensitive estimated in the EIS for redevelopment of Sub- analysis locations. district 1B (see the Transportation section and Appendix B to this Consistency Analysis for details). -· Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • The predicted sound levels from the • Consistent with EIS conclusion. redevelopment alternatives would not result in significant unavoidable adverse impacts. Boeing Renton Sub-District 1B Environmental Consistency Analysts May, 2006 S-9 Sub-Districts 1A and 1 B Redeveloement to those identified in the EIS would be implemented, and no significant impacts would result. • Consistent with EIS analysis, because the level of development assumed for Sub-district 1A and 1 B together would fall within the range of development assumed for this area in the EIS. i Also, standard noise reduction mitigation 1 measures similar to those identified in the EIS would be implemented. • Consistent with EIS analysis, because vehicle trip generation from cumulative redevelopment would be within the range estimated in the EIS I (see the Transportation section and Appendix B to this Consistency Analysis for details). ..,-- • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. ·- Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives PUBLIC SERVICES Sub-District 1 B Redevelooment Sub-Districts 1 A and 1 B Redevelopment_ j ' Fire and Emergency Services • Construction-related impacts would include the • Consistent with EIS analysis. • Same as under Sub-district 18 for cumulative potential for increases ,n calls for service 1A and 18 redevelopment. related to inspection of the construction sites and potential construction-related injuries. • At full buildout under Alternative 2 in 2015, an • At partial buildout of Sub-district 18 in 2015, an • Increases in calls for fire service generated by I increase in annual calls for service from the increase in annual calls for fire service of up to the cumulative redevelopment for Sub-districts Renton Fire Department of two to three percent 2 percent over 2002 levels would be expected; 1A and 18 would represent approximately up over the 2002 district-wide call levels would be at full buildout in 2030, an increase of up to 3 to a 4 to 5 percent increase over 2002 levels in expected; at full buildout under Alternatives 3 percent over 2002 levels would be expected. 2015 and 2030, respectively. These increases and 4 in 2030, an increase in annual calls for These increases in calls for fire service would in calls for fire service would be within the service from the Renton Fire Department of 19 be within the range estimated in the EIS. range estimated in the EIS. and 30 percent, respectively, over 2002 district- wide call levels would be expected. i------ • At full buildout under Alternatives 3 and 4 in • With only Sub-district 18 redevelopment, • Similar to EIS analysis; however, with Sub- 2030, the projected increase in calls could expanded personnel levels and equipment districts 1A and 18 redevelopment, expanded require expanded personnel levels and fire and would likely not be necessary. personnel levels and equipment may or may emergency response equipment to ensure not be necessary. ' consistent response levels to the site area and overall service area. Law Enforcement ' I 1B I • New commercial square footage identified I • At full buildout of Sub-district • Increases in calls generated by the cumulative under Alternative 2 would generate calls for I redevelopment, an increase in annual calls for redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 18 police service; such call volumes are not , service from the Renton Police Department of would represent up to an approximately 3 anticipated to be significant. At full buildout less than 2 percent over 2002 district-wide call percent increase over 2002 district-wide call under Alternatives 3 and 4 in 2030, an increase levels would be expected, and would be within levels in 2030, and would be within the range in annual calls for service from the Renton the range estimated in the EIS. estimated in the EIS. Police Department of 13 and 16 percent, respectively, over 2002 district-wide call levels would be expected. ' I --~-~~ • At full buildout under Alternatives 3 and 4 in • The potential for increases in calls and • The potential for increases in calls and , 2030, an additional 4.1 to 5.3 patrol officers associated need for increased personnel levels associated need for increased personnel levels (over 2003 levels) would be needed to maintain and equipment at full buildout of Sub-district 1 8 and equipment at full buildout of Sub-districts the existing City of Renton level of service would be within the range estimated in the EIS, 1A and 18 together would be within the range 1 standard of 1.75 oatrol officers to 1,000 and less than under Alternatives 3 and 4. estimated in the EIS, and less than under _ Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis S-10 May, 2006 Summary Matrix 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1B Redevelopment Sub-Districts 1A and 1B Redevelopment -- population. Long-term capital and operating Alternatives 3 and 4. needs would be addressed through incremental capital facilities planning over the buildout I period and beyond. Schools I • Increases in enrollment associated with ' • At full buildout of Sub-district 1 B. an enrollment • The enrollment increase generated by the Alternative 2 would not be expected to be increase of up to 2 percent over 2002 district-cumulative redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A significant. At full buildout under Alternatives 3 wide enrollment would be expected to be and 1 B would represent an increase of up to 4 and 4 in 2030, an enrollment increase of 7 and generated and would be within the range percent over 2002 district-wide enrollment in 9 percent, respectively, over 2002 district-wide estimated in the EIS. This increase in 2025; this increase would be within the range enrollment would be expected. This would enrollment would represent about 1 percent of estimated in the EIS. represent about 5 to 6 percent of future future projected district-wide enrollment in projected district-wide enrollment in 2025. 2025. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • With implementation of mitigation measures, no • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative significant unavoidable adverse impacts to mitigation measures similar to those identified in 1A and 1 B redevelopment. public services from Alternatives 2, 3 and 4, as the EIS would be implemented. analyzed, would be expected. It is anticipated that incremental increases in population over the 25 year buildout period(s) would be planned for through the capital facilities planning by the City of Renton and other affected agencies. ----UTILITIES Impacts • The capacity of the City of Renton's water • Similar to EIS analysis, because the water • Similar to EIS analysis, because the water system (based on annual water rights capacity) demand generated by the redevelopment demand generated by redevelopment of Sub- would be adequate to serve future assumed for Sub-district 1 B would be within the districts 1 A and 1 B would be within the range redevelopment. Based on water demand range of demand estimated in the EIS. of demand estimated in the EIS. estimates related to future growth in the City (used in the 1998 Water System Plan) at full I buildout under Alternative 2 in 2015, annual i water demand would be approximately four ' percent of total City water system capacity; at full buildout of Alternatives 3 and 4 in 2030, annual water demand would be 13 and 19 percent, respectively, of total City water system capacity. a - Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis S-11 Summary Matrix May, 2006 2003 EIS Alternatives Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment Sub-Districts 1A and 1B Redevelopmenti • New infrastructure improvements, including but • Similar to EIS analysis; infrastructure • Similar to EIS analysis; infrastructure not limited to new transmission and distribution improvements would only be required to serve improvements would only be required to serve mains, domestic meters, fire hydrants, pressure the redevelopment of Sub-district 1 B. redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 18. reducing stations, and storage, would be needed. The private Boeing water system ! would not be used to provide water to any redeveloped areas. • At full buildout of Alternative 2 in 2015, annual • Annual wastewater flows from redevelopment in • Annual wastewater flows from redevelopment wastewater flows from the site area would be Sub-district 18 would be within the range in Sub-districts 1A and 1 B together would be about 398 million gallons, including allowances , estimated in the EIS. within the range estimated in the EIS. for infiltration/inflow. At full buildout of Alternatives 3 and 4 in 2030, annual wastewater flows from the site area would be I about 564 and 714 million gallons, respectively, including allowances for infiltration/inflow. These flows would be less than 2 percent of the total King County Eastside Interceptor sewer main capacity. • New wastewater collection systems would be • Consistent with EIS analysis. • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative required. The existing Boeing-owned 1A and 1 B redevelopment. wastewater facilities would not be used to serve any future redevelopment. New wastewater facilities would be constructed in accordance ! with City of Renton standards. --~ Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ! I • With ongoing utility systems and capital • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cumulative facilities planning by the City of Renton, utility mitigation measures similar to those identified in 1 A and 1 B redevelopment. infrastructure improvements would be made to the EIS would be implemented. ensure adequate capacity to serve the demand associated with growth from the redevelopment alternatives and on an overall basis in the City. No significant unavoidable impacts are anticipated. AIR QUALITY Impacts • Probable significant adverse air quality impacts • Consistent with EIS analysis, because • Consistent with EIS analysis, because from redevelooment under Alternatives 2, 3 redevelooment assumed for Sub-district 1 B redevelopment of Sub-districts 1A and 18 Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis S-12 Summary Matrix May, 2006 2003 EIS Alternatives and 4 would not be likely, because mixed-use urban redevelopment are generally neutral or beneficial to regional air quality, as they allow development to occur close to employment centers and housing, thereby minimizing commute times and associated vehicle emissions. • Under Alternatives 2, 3 and 4, local air pollutant emissions from associated traffic would represent less than 0.5 percent of the regional transportation emission budget. Redevelopment in this location could reduce local emissions in other parts of the Puget Sound region; therefore, no significant impact to regional air quality would be expected under any of the redevelopment alternatives. • Prior to future construction of new signalized intersections, a local intersection-level conformity analysis would be completed per WAC 173-420-120, which requires analysis of newly signalized intersections in air quality maintenance areas. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • With implementation of mitigation measures, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts to regional or local air quality would occur. Sub-District 1 B Redevelopment ·1Sub-Districts 1A and 18 Redevelop1 ment d-use would represent an urban mixed-use I development. • Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub- district 1 B local air pollutant emissions would be within the range estimated in the EIS. • Consistent with EIS analysis. The City is currently preparing an air quality conformity analysis related to the construction of new intersections in the site area. • Consistent with EIS conclusion, because mitigation measures similar to those identified in the EIS would be implemented. would represent urban mi; developments. • Consistent with EIS analysis, because Sub- ssions eEIS. districts 1A and 1 B local air pollutant emi would be within the range estimated in th • Consistent with EIS analysis. The currently preparing an air quality car analysis related to the construction , intersections in the site area. City is 'ormity f new ··--- • Same as under Sub-district 1 B for cum ulative 1A and 1 B redevelopment. Boeing Renton Sub-District 18 Environmental Consistency Analysis S-13 Summary Matrix May, 2006 Appendix A Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-District 1 B Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-District 1 B May 2, 2006 Prepared By KPFF Consulting Engeineers 711 Court, Suite 202 Tacoma, WA 98402 (253) 396-0150 (253) 396-0162 FAX Introduction The City of Renton issued the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in October 2003. The Boeing Company is proceeding with plans for future redevelopment of Boeing Renton Plant Sub-districts IB. This sub-district is part of the overall site that was evaluated in the 2003 EIS. The Boeing Company is seeking a Planned Action designation for their current Conceptual Plan. Preparation of an Environmental Consistency Analysis is requested by the City in order for the project to be eligible as a Planned Action. Following is the Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis for Sub-district !B. A separate Surface/Stormwater Consistency Analysis has been prepared for Sub-district IA. The Sub-district 1 B surface/storm water analysis compares the storm water conditions associated with the current Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1 B to those associated with the range of development alternatives for this area analyzed in the 2003 EIS. The analysis highlights any differences in probable significant impacts to surface or stormwater conditions from the current redevelopment plan, and indicates whether the impacts were adequately addressed in the 2003 EIS. This analysis includes a cumulative analysis of the current redevelopment plans proposed for both Sub-districts IA and !B. The goal of the analysis is to determine whether the impacts of redevelopment of Sub- district 1 B, and the cumulative impacts of the redevelopment of Sub-districts 1 A and !B, are within the range of development alternatives and associated impacts analyzed in the 2003 EIS, and that Sub-district 1 B is, therefore, eligible for Planned Action designation. Summary of Redevelopment Scenarios The Boeing Conceptual Redevelopment Plan (BCRP) for Sub-district I A includes a range of potential uses and redevelopment scenarios that are discussed in detail in Chapter 1 of the Boeing Renton Plant Sub-District I B Environmental Consistency Analysis. For the purposes of analyzing the consistency of the current proposal with the EIS, the range of redevelopment scenarios identified by the BCRP have been compared in this report to the range of Alternatives evaluated in the EIS. Sub-district 1 B was identified in the EIS Surface/Stormwater Technical Report as Sub-Area C. BCRP Impervious Coverage "Table I, Impervious coverage associated with redevelopment alternatives" provides a comparison of impervious areas that would cover Sub-Area C, or Subdistrict I B, within the EIS site area, dependent on the redevelopment. This table is similar to the Draft EIS, Volume II, "Table 3.1 -Impervious Coverage". Primary differences between Table 2, herein, and the Draft EIS, Volume II, "Table 3.1 - Impervious Coverage", include the addition of the BCRP, and the omission of unaffected Sub-Areas, as the BCRP only affects EIS Sub-Area C. Baseline EIS Redevelopment Existim1 Alternatives BCRP Scenarios Sub-Area (%) (%) (%) C 100 100to38 93 to 88 -- Table 1 -Impervious coverage associated with redevelopment alternatives. ' - The BCRP scenarios would range from a high of ninety-three to a low of eighty-eight percent impervious coverage. This impervious coverage is within the range of EIS alternatives evaluated, and is lower than the present day, baseline. The BCRP would add varying amounts of pervious space, dependent on the decided upon BCRP scenario. Generally speaking, the higher the impervious coverage, the less pervious space is anticipated. Storm Water Quantity Analysis Method For consistency, the analysis method and calculation assumptions used in this Report are identical to those used in the DEIS. Storm water quantity analysis is performed according to the 200 I Department of Ecology (DOE) Manual and specifically follows the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) method. Reference Draft EIS Volume ll, 3.1 to 3.3 for a more comprehensive explanation of the analysis methods and procedures. BCRP Quantitative Peak Flow Data and Quantitative Comparison Analysis "Table 2 -Storm event peak flows versus redevelopment alternatives for Sub-District 1 B" provides a comparison of baseline conditions, EIS alternatives and BCRP scenarios corresponding to five storm frequency events. EIS Baseline Redevelopment Storm Event (Existinol Alternatives BCRP Scenarios 6mo Flow (cfs) 15.36 14.89 to 7.63 14.06 to 13.56 2yr Flow (cfs) 21.35 21.32 to 12.92 i 20.36to 19.78 !Oyr Flow (cfs) 31.98 31.90 to 22.63 30.84 to 30.20 25yr Flow (cfs) 36.46 36.45 to 27.04 35.38 to 34.73 IOOyr Flow (cfs) 43.45 43.43 to 33.96 42.35 to 41. 70 Table 2 -Storm event peak flows versus redevelopment alternatives for Sub-District I B. Peak stormwater flows are very closely linked to the level of impervious ground coverage. In comparison to the range of EIS alternatives, the BCRP scenarios would decrease the amount of impervious surface (see Table 2); therefore, peak flows would decrease as stormwater is able to permeate pervious surface area. In comparison to the baseline, peak flows for the BCRP scenarios would be reduced. The peak stormwatcr flows for the BCRP scenarios would be within the range of peak stormwater flows for the 2 evaluated EIS alternatives, and lower than the present day, baseline peak stonnwater flows. Also of significance in Table 2, is how impervious coverage impacts peak runoff to a greater extent during more frequent stonn events. For example, the six-month storm event decreases the peak runoff by as little as 8.5% and as much as 11.8%, comparing BCRP scenarios and the baseline. The same comparison with a 100-yr storm event would decrease peak runoff by 2.5% to 4.0%. This makes sense, considering that pervious surfaces have a limited ability to absorb water during infrequent storm events, after which the surfaces become saturated and begin functioning similar to impervious surfaces. Storm Water Collection and Conveyance In its existing condition, stonnwater runoff from Sub-District lB is collected and conveyed through a storm drainage system which discharges through outfa11s located on the Cedar River, John's Creek and Lake Washington. These outfa11s are identified in the EIS as Outfall #15 (Cedar River), Outfalls #13 and #14 (John's Creek) and Outfall #1 (Lake Washington). As assumed in the EIS, conveyance system components could be designed to divert water away from existing overcapacity outfalls within the EIS study area to the extent possible. There are 16 storm drain outfalls receiving stormwater runoff from the EIS study area. As stated in the EIS, some of the outfalls and the John's Creek channel, which receives flow from two outfalls in the EIS study area, appear to be over capacity during some storm events, while others appear to have excess capacity. Since the alternatives evaluated in the EIS, as well as the BCRP, involve redevelopment of large areas of the EIS study area, it is assumed that stormwater runoff could be directed to outfalls with excess capacity, and away from John's Creek and the outfalls that are overcapacity. This approach would benefit the area surrounding the EIS study area by alleviating drainage issues that are currently present. The degree to which this approach can be implemented in the EIS Alternatives, and in the BCRP (when Boeing Company operations remain in the site area), would be somewhat dependent on the extent to which existing Boeing owned and maintained outfalls can be utilized to convey runoff from non-Boeing properties. Since the possibility of implementing this approach was unknown at the time the EIS was issued, two approaches for handling stormwater runoff are considered in the EIS, defined as Case 1 and Case 2. To evaluate the consistency of the BCRP with the El S, the BCRP is considered in tenns of both the Case 1 and Case 2 approaches to handling stonnwater. These approaches are defined as follows: Case l -In Case 1, the general stormwater runoff patterns of the site area would be maintained, the areas drained by each of the existing outfalls would be maintained in size and configuration to the extent possible within the constraints of the assumed development in each redevelopment alternative; and in alternatives where Boeing Company operations continue within the EIS site area, a separation would be maintained 3 between systems carrying stormwatcr runoff from the areas used the Boeing Company and systems carrying stormwater runoff from areas used by others. Case 2 -In Case 2, stormwater runoff directed to the outfalls in John's Creek and overcapacity outfalls serving the EIS site area would be minimized to the extent possible by directing stormwater runoff from areas currently draining to John's Creek into outfalls with excess capacity on Lake Washington currently owned and maintained by the Boeing Company, in particular Outfall # l, which has a capacity of 437 cfs and a peak flow of 69.94 cfs during the 25-year design storm event. BCRP Outfall Impacts Qualitative Assessment Stormwater from Sub-District I B flows to multiple outfalls in the baseline condition and under the EIS Redevelopment Alternatives. Additionally, these outfalls receive stormwater from areas other than Sub-District 1 B. To provide a specific analysis of the impacts to outfalls associated with the BCRP and a comparison of the impacts with those identified in the EIS, the following calculations were prepared: 1. Peak flows at the outfalls rece1vmg stormwatcr from the BCRP area were calculated. 2. Calculations assume that the BCRP is constructed and that the remainder of the EIS study area remains in its existing condition. 3. Calculations were prepared for the Case 1 and Case 2 approaches to bandling of stormwater runoff, as defined previously in this report. 4. Calculations were prepared for the 25-year storm event, which is the basis of design for new conveyance systems according to the 200 I DOE manual. These calculated peak flows are presented in comparison to the baseline condition and the EIS Alternatives in Tables 3 and 4 below. Baseline (Existing) EIS Redevelopment Outfall No. (cfs) Alternatives ( cfs) BCRP Scenarios ( cfs) 1 69.94 81.82 to 58.27 81.41 to 81.08 Band 14 73.79 68.95 to 66.28 72. 97 to 72. 76 15 25.03 19.26 to 15.50 18.81 to 18.44 Table 3 -Case I : 25 Year Storm Event Peak Flows at Outfalls Affected by BCRP As indicated in Table 3, for Case I at Outfall #15, the BCRP scenarios would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition, and would result in flows that would be within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Flows identified for Outfalls # 13 and # 14 are combined, since the pipes are nearly identical in destination, and flows may be split between these two outfalls, dependent on 4 the detailed design of any site development. At Outfalls # 13 and # 14, the BCRP scenarios would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition. However, Jlows would increase relative to the calculated Jlow range for the EIS Alternatives. This difference is attributable to the fact that the EIS Alternatives included, at a minimum, redevelopment of Sub Areas A, B and C, while the BCRP reflects only redevelopment of Sub Area C. Since Outfalls #13 and #14 receive the majority of their flow from Sub Areas A and B, the lower flows at these outfalls identified in the EIS Alternatives would not occur until Sub Areas A and Bare redeveloped in the future. Flows identified for Outfall # I would be within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives, but greater than the baseline condition. The capacity of Outfall #I is 437 cfs. Therefore the increased flow is well within the capacity of the outfall. Outfall No. II Baseline II EIS Redevelopment II (Existino) Alternatives (cfs} BCRP Scenarios (els) 69.94 I 122.31 to 96.39 I 87.62 to 87.15 13 and 14 73.79 I 45.47 to 20.90 I 64.46 to 64.37 15 25.03 I 16.45 to 12.51 I 14.14 to 13.77 Table 4 -Case 2: 25 Year Storm Event Peak Flows at Outfalls Affected by the BCRP As indicated in Table 4, for Case 2 at Outfall #15, the BCRP scenarios would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition, and result in flows that are within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Flows identified for Outfalls # 13 and # 14 are combined, since the pipes are nearly identical in destination, and flows may be split between these two outfalls, dependent on the detailed design of any site development. At Outfalls # 13 and # 14, the BCRP scenarios would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition, and result in flows that are greater than the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. This difference is atlributable to the fact that the EIS Alternatives included, at a minimum, redevelopment of Sub Areas A, B and C, while the BCRP reflects only redevelopment of Sub Area C. Since Outfalls # 13 and # 14 receive the majority of their flow from Sub Areas A and B, the reduction in flows at these outfalls identified in the EIS Alternatives would not occur until Sub Areas A and B are redeveloped in the future. At Outfall #I, the BCRP scenarios would result in flows that arc lower than the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Similar to conditions at Outfalls #13 and #14, this difference is attributable to the fact that the EIS Alternatives included, at a minimum, redevelopment of Sub Areas A, B and C while the BCRP reilects only redevelopment of Sub Area C. Since the Case 2 Alternatives in the EIS sought to route runoff from I 00% of Sub Area B toward the excess capacity available at Outfall #1, the increase in flow at Outfall # I would not occur until Sub Area B is redeveloped in the future. The BCRP scenarios increase anticipated flows at Outfall # I in comparison to the baseline condition. However, the capacity of Outfall #1 is 437 cfs. Therefore, the increased flow is well within the capacity of the outfall. 5 Summary of Consistency Analysis for BCRP The findings of this Report conclude that specific conditions and calculated impacts associated with the BCRP are consistent with the conditions and calculated impacts associated with the range of redevelopment Alternatives analyzed in the EIS. Peak runoff f1ows from the study area to the applicable outfalls would generally be reduced in comparison to the baseline condition, except for to Outfall #1. The peak f1ow at Outfall #1 would increase in comparison to the baseline condition. However, the increase would result in a peak flow that is well below the capacity of the outfall. The peak flows at Outfalls # 13 and # 14 would increase relative to the EIS alternatives. These increases in flows are attributable to the fact that the EIS Alternatives included, at a minimum, redevelopment of Sub Areas A, B and C, while the BCRP reflects only redevelopment of Sub Area C. Since Outfalls # 13 and # 14 receive the majority of their flow from Sub Areas A and B, the lower flows at these outfalls under the EIS Alternatives would not occur until Sub Areas A and B are redeveloped in the future. The peak flow at Outfall # 15 would decrease in comparison to the baseline condition, and would result in flows that are within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Similar to the conclusion of the EIS, there would be no significant impacts to the surface or storm water environment as a result of the BCRP. Summary of Cumulative Impacts To understand the cumulative impacts of the BCRP in Sub District !B, the Harvest Partners Master Plan proposal for Sub District 1 A and the arterials planned by the City of Renton associated with the proposals, combined peak storm event flows and peak outfall flows were calculated for the three proposals. These calculations were compared to the conditions and calculated impacts included in the EIS for Sub Areas A, B, and C and the EIS arterials. The areas of redevelopment included in the current proposals are approximately 8% smaller than the areas assumed for redevelopment in the EIS as shown below in Table 6. This difference is primarily due to the difference in the extent of roadway development . CJ Impervious Peak Storm Event Flows (cfs) Area (acres) Coverage(%) I 6mo II 2ir II lO~r I 25vr lOOvr EIS I 17.0 100 to 66.7 38.44 lo 55.05 to 82.34 to 94.lOto 112.Il to 29.62 44.82 71.07 82.65 100.59 Current 108.4 91.6 to 89.5 33.87 lo 48.98 to 74.llto 85.02 to 101.66 to Prooosals 33.37 48.44 73.48 84.34 100.98 Table 6 -Cumulative Impervious Coverage and Peak Storm Event Flows for Sub D1stnct lA, Sub District lB and Arterials As indicated in Table 6, the cumulative impervious coverage and peak storm event flows are within the range of EIS Alternatives. Since the current proposals and the EIS Alternatives do not affect precisely the same areas, the peak storm event flows were also calculated on a per acre basis. 6 Peak Stonn Event Flows (cfs/acre) Area (acres) 6mo I 2yr II I Oyr II 25vr I IOOvr EIS 117.0 0.33 to 0.25 0.47 to 0.38 0.70 to 0.61 0.80 to 0.71 I o.96 to o.86 CuiTent I I 08.4 0.31 0.45 0.68 0.78 I 0.94 Prooosals I Table 7 -Cumulative Peak Storm Event Flows per Acre for Suh D1stnct 1A, Sub U1stnct I Band Arterials As indicated in Table 7, the peak storm event flows from each acre affected by the current proposals is within the range of peak storm flows anticipated in the evaluation of the EIS Alternatives. Summary of Arterial Development As discussed in the report titled Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 A Stonmwater Consistency Analysis, the City of Renton plans to improve existing and develop new arterial roadways defined as Logan Avenue, Park Avenue, 8th Street and 10 1h Street. Table 5 below compares impervious coverage and storm event peak 11ows for five storm frequency events associated with the arterials assumed to serve the EIS Alternatives and the arterials currently planned to serve the Boeing and Harvest Partners proposals. Impervious Peak Stonn Event Flows ( cfs) Area (acres) Coverage(%) ~I 2yr II lOyr II 25yr II lOOyr EIS Arterials 29.1 J 100 9.57 13.7 20.49 23.42 27.90 Arterials Planned to Setve Boeing or 16.9 Harvest Partners 87.4 5.55 7.95 11.90 13.60 16.20 Pronosals I I Table 5 -Impervious Coverage and Peak Storm Flows for Proposed Artenals Note: The roadway sections of these arterials will provide capacity at a level that is greater than required to serve District 1. I From Table 5, a significant reduction in runoff from the arterials under the City's current plans is evident in comparison lo the arterials proposed to serve the EIS Alternatives. This reduction is attributable to two factors: I. The currently planned arterials cover a smaller area than is assumed in the EIS. The analysis contained in the EIS assumes roadway development that would be sufficient to support redevelopment of the entire EIS study area (including District 2 to the west of Logan Avenue N.), while the City's current plans include roadway development (i.e., roadway sections) that will provide capacity at a level that is greater than required to serve District I only (Sub-district IA and 1 B redevelopment), but lesser than required to serve the entire EIS study area. 2. The impervious coverage of the currently planned arterials is reduced in comparison to the arterials assumed in the EIS. As a result of this reduced 7 impervious coverage, the peak runoff per acre of arterial is lower for the currently planned arterials in comparison to the arterials assumed in the EIS. Cumulative Impacts Qualitative Assessment To provide a specific analysis of the cumulative impacts to outfalls affected by the BCRP, the Harvest Partners proposal and the arterials planned by the City of Renton and a comparison of the impacts with those identified in the EIS, the following calculations were prepared: I. Peak flows at the outfalls rece1vmg stormwater from the three areas were calculated. 2. Calculations assume that the BCRP, Harvest Partners proposal and associated arterials are constructed, and that the remainder of the EIS study area remains in its existing condition. 3. Calculations were prepared for the Case I and Case 2 approaches to handling of stormwater runoff, as defined previously in this report. 4. Calculations were prepared for the 25-year storm event, which is the basis of design for new conveyance systems according to the 2001 DOE manual. These calculated peak flows are presented in comparison to the baseline condition and the EIS Alternatives in Tables 8 and 9 below. Baseline (Existing) EIS Redevelopment Cumulative Redevelopment Outfall No. (cfs) Alternatives (cfs) Proposals ( cfs) 1 69.94 81.82 to 58.27 81.41 to 81.08 lJ and 14 73.79 68.95 to 66.28 62.23 to 62.06 15 25.03 19.26 to 15.50 18.81 to 18.44 Table 8 -Case I : 25 Year Storm Event Peak Flows at Outfalls Affected by the Cumulative Redevelopment Proposals As indicated in Table 8, for Case 1 at Outfall #15, the Cumulative Redevelopment proposals would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition, and result in flows that are within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Flows identified for Outfalls # 13 and # 14 are combined, since the pipes are nearly identical in destination, and flows may be split between these two outfalls, dependent on the detailed design of any redevelopment. At Outfalls # 13 and # 14, the Cumulative Redevelopment proposals would decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition and result in flows that are below the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. This difference is attributahle to the fact that the Cumulative proposals include a smaller area of redevelopment than the area included in the EIS Alternatives as described above. If the areas included in the current proposals matched the EIS Redevelopment areas precisely, the peak storm flows at Outfalls #13 and #14 would be within the range anticipated in the EIS. 8 At Outfall #I, flows are within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives, and increased in comparison to the baseline condition. The capacity of Outfall #J is 437 cfs. Therefore the increased flow would be well below the capacity of the outfall. Baseline (Existing) EIS Redevelopment Cumulative Redevelopment Outfall '-lo. (cfs) Alternatives (cfs) Proposals (cfs) I 69.94 122.31 to 96.39 107.24 to 106.75 I l3 and 14 I 73.79 I 45.47 to 20.90 I 38.68 to 38.61 I 15 I 25.03 I l6.45to 12.51 I I 5.23 to 14.85 Table 9 -Case 2: 25 Year Storm Event Peak Flows at Outfalls Affected by the Cumulative Redevelopment Proposals I I As indicated in Table 9, for Case 2 at Outfalls #13, #14 and #15, the Cumulative Redevelopment proposals would generally decrease anticipated flows in comparison to the baseline condition, and would result in flows that are within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives. Flows identified for Outfalls # 13 and # 14 are combined, since the pipes are nearly identical in destination, and flows may be split between these two outfalls, dependent on the detailed design of any redevelopment. Flows at Outfall # I arc within the calculated range for the EIS Alternatives and would be increased in comparison to the baseline condition. The capacity of Outfall #1 is 437 cfs. Therefore, the increased flow is well below the capacity of the outfall. Summary of Consistency Analy~·is for Cumulative Impacts The findings of this Report conclude that specific cumulative conditions and calculated impacts associated with the BCRP, Harvest Partners proposal and planned City of Renton arterial development are consistent with the conditions and calculated impacts associated with the range of redevelopment Alternatives analyzed in the EIS. Peak runoff flows from the redevelopment areas would generally be reduced in comparison to the baseline condition, and would be within the range of peak runoff flows calculated for the EIS Alternatives. The peak flow at Outfall #1 would be increased in comparison lo the baseline condition; however, the increase would result in a peak flow that would be well below the capacity of the outfall. Similar to the conclusion of the EIS, there are no significant impacts to the surface or storm waler environment as a result of the BCRP. 9 Appendix B Transportation Consistency Analysis for Sub-District 1 B DATE: TO: CC: FROM: RE: Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 1, 2006 Alex Pietsch, Administrator, Memorandum Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton Mike Blumen, President Blumen Consulting Group, Inc. Michael J. Read, P .E. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Boeing Conceptual Plan (Sub-district 1B) -Transportation Consistency Analysis of Proposed Redevelopment under the Conceptual Plan with the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS - The memorandum summarizes a detailed comparative trip generation analysis of the Boeing Conceptual RedetJeiopment Plan -Sub-district 1B, a proposed conceptual redevelopment plan calling for mixed use development within Sub-district 1B of the overall Boeing Renton Plant site. Redevelopment of the 290-acre Boeing Renton Plant site was evaluated in the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment (BRCPA) EIS (2001). Sub-district 1B is noted as Subarea C in the 2003 EIS. This analysis addresses consistency with the transportation clement of the EIS, and specifically with the land use and trip generation assumptions that were used to evaluate the transportation impacts of redevelopment. For traffic analysis purposes, proposed uses under the Boeing Conceptual Plan -Sub-district 1B were assumed to comprise approximately 1,478,000 square-feet of new development at build-out, and would include approximately 210,000 square-feet ln new office space, 180,000 square-feet 111 laboratory/technology uses, 535 residential apartment units (assumes 800 square-feet per unit), with the remaining 270,000 square-feet in a mixture of retail uses in 2015. By 2030, an additional 390,000 square feet of laboratory/ technology and office uses were assumed to be constructed. Under both 2015 and 2030 horizon years, the existing 660,000 square-feet of Boeing-occupied office space within Sub-district 1B was assumed to be sold or leased to non-Boeing owners/tenants. Existing Boeing employees within these buildings were assumed to be consolidated within Boeing operations located in facilities west of Logan Avenue N., consistent with the BRPCA EIS assumptions. This assumption related to relocation of Boeing en1ployees provides a worst-case analysis of transportation i1npacts from redevelopment (Refer to Chapter 1 of the Consistency Analysis document for more information on the Conceptual Plan for Sub-district IB). This report analyzes a potential range and mix of land uses within Sub-district 1B from a worst-case vehicle trip generation standpoint. The potential range of uses proposed within the Boeing Conceptual Plan -Sub-district IB could result in a higher total square footage of redevelopment than evaluated in this report. However, to evaluate a worst-case trip generation scenario, individual Development Parcels (DP) noted within the Boeing Conceptual Plan -Sub-district IB were tested to determine which proposed land use and level of development would generate the maximum number of trips for each parcel ,vi thin www.tenw.com PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May 1, 2006 Page 2 Sub-district lB. Based upon this review, multifamily residential uses were assumed in DP-1, laboratory/technology uses were assumed in DP-2, and office uses were assurned in DP-3 and DP-4. Trip Generation Comparison Trip generation methodologies and assumptions applied in the BRCPi\ EIS were usc<l to estimate a.m. peak and p.m. peak hour vehicle trips that would be generated by redevelopment un<ler the /Joei,\~ Conceptual Plan-Sub-district /B. Table 1 provi<les a summary of the estimated 2015 and 2030 a.m. peak and p.m. peak hour vehicle trip generation of redevelopment under the Conceptual Plan compared \\~th those trip generation levels used to evaluate transportation impacts and outline mitigation measures for Alternative 4 in the BRCPA EIS (i.e., the maximum redevelopment scenario). Detailed trip generation comparisons to all EIS alternatives arc prm~<led as Attachment A. As shown, total off-site vehicle trip generation levels of redevelopment under the Boeing Com,ptual Plan are significantly less than those estimated un<ler Alternative 4 in the BRC:PA EIS. Reductions in vehicle trip generation from Sub-district 1B would range from approximately 272 p.m. peak hour trips in 2015 to nearly 1,129 a.m. peak hour trips in 2030, and the number of trips are substantially less than those levels used to evaluate traffic impacts and develop mitigation for the EIS. Although an estimated increase in entering p.m. peak hour trips (96 p.m. peak hour trips) is estimated to result by 2015 v.~th redevelopment under the Boeing Conceptual Plan versus those levels evaluated in the BRCPA EIS, the significant reduction in estimated exiting trips from the site (nearly 370 p.m. peak hour trips) woul<l on an overall basis result in less trip generation and improved intersection levels of service as compared to those reported in the BRCPA EIS. Therefore, based upon this comparative analysis: redevelopment according to the Boeing Conceptual Plan for Sub-district lB would result in less peak hour vehicle trip generation as compared to the trip generation reported and evaluated in the 2003 EIS for this portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site; there woul<l be no differences in probable significant traffic impacts or mitigation needs from redevelopment under the proposed Plan as compared to those disclosed in the BRC:P A EIS; and redevelopment of approximately 1,478,000 square-feet of new mixed use development in Sub-district lB, as assumed under the Boeing Conceptual Plan, is within the range of development alternatives and associated impacts addressed in the 2003 EIS. As noted previously, the potential range of uses proposed within the Boeing Conceptual Plan -Sub- district 1B could result in a higher total square footage of redevelopment than evaluated in this report. However, to evaluate a worst-case trip generation scenario, certain land uses and levels of development in the individual Development Parcels (DP) within Sub-district lB, that were estimated to generate a higher number of vehicle trips, were used in the consistency analysis of transportation impacts. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May I, 2006 Table 1 -Sub-district 1 B 2015/2030 Trip Generation Comparison 2015 Development Scenario Enter Exit Total AM Peak Hour Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 823 293 1, 116 Sub-district 1 B Alternative 4 1,487 277 1,764 BRCPA EIS Difference from BRCPA EIS -664 16 -648 PM Peak Hour Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 450 1,081 1,531 Sub-district 1 B Alternative 4 354 1,449 1,803 BRCPA EIS Difference from BRCPA EIS 96 -368 -272 20301 Development Scenario Enter Exit Total AMPeakHour Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 1,011 420 1,431 Sub-district 1 B Alternative 4 2,199 361 2,560 BRCPA EIS Difference from BRCPA EIS -1, 188 59 -1, 129 PMPeakHour Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 295 1.354 1,657 Sub-district I B Alternative 4 409 2,047 2,456 BRCPA EIS ~- Difference from BRCPA EIS -114 -693 -799 Note: These compar1sons Jo not cuns1dt:r add1t10nal mode split adiustments made m the tnp gcncratton estunates evaluated m the BR.CPA EIS, and therefore, should be considered conservative Tnp generation estimates from the BRCPA EIS can be found in Attachment B of Appendix E in Volume II of the Draft EIS. Cumulative Impacts -Sub-district 1 A and Sub-district 1 B Page 3 Table 2 provides a summary of the estimated 2015 and 2030 a.m. peak and p.m. peak hour vehicle trip generation for the cumulative redevelopment under both The Landing (Sub-district lA Master Plan and the Boeing Conceptual Plan (Sub-district 1 B), as compared with those trip generation levels used to evaluate transportation impacts and outline mitigation measures for Alternative 4 in the BRCP A EIS (i.e., the maximum redevelopment scenario). Detailed trip generation comparisons to all EIS alternatives are provided as Attachment B. Note: A separate consistency analysis has been prepared for The Landing Master Plan proposal; see Chapter 1 of this Consistency Analysis document for description of The Landing, Sub-district 1 A redevelopment proposal. As shown, total off-site vehicle trip generation levels from redevelopment under the Boeing Conceptual Pian (Sub-district 1B) and the Landing Master Plan (Sub-district 1A) are significantly less than those estimated under Alternative 4 in the BRCPA EIS. Reductions in cumulative vehicle trip generation from Sub-district lA and lB redevelopment would range from approximately 720 p.m. peak hour trips in 2015 to 3,935 a.m. peak hour trips in 2030, and the number of trips are substantially less than those levels used to evaluate traffic impacts and develop mitigation for the EIS. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 + Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 + Toll Free (888) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May l, 2006 Page 4 Table 2 -Sub-district 1 A & 1 B 2015/2030 Trio Generation Com :iar1son 2015 Development Scenario Enter Exit Total -- AMPukHour - The Landing & Boeing Concept Plan ( Feb. 2006) 1, 1 31 444 1,575 Sub-district 1A & I B Alternative 4 -BRCPA EIS 2,948 524 3,472 Difference from BRCPA EIS -1,817 -80 -1,897 PMPukHour The Landing & Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 1,206 1,951 3.157 Sub-district 1A & 1B Alternative 4 -BRCPA EIS 838 3,039 3,877 Difference from BRCPA EIS 368 -1.088 -720 20301 Development Scenario Enter Exit Total AM Peak Hour The Landing & Boeing Concept Plan ( Feb. 2006) 1,306 547 1,853 Sub-district 1A & 1B Alternative 4 -BRCPA EIS 5,006 782 5,788 Difference from BRCPA EIS -3,700 -235 I -3,935 PM Peak Hour The Landing & Boeing Concept Plan (Feb. 2006) 1,013 2,224 3,237 Sub-district 1A & I B Alternative 4 -BRCPA EIS 1,094 4,935 I 5,929 Difference from BRCPA EIS -81 -2,611 -2,692 Note: These compansons do not com1dt:r ;1ckltt1onal mode spht ad1ustmcms made m the tnp generation estmmtes evaluated m the BRCPi\ EIS, and therefore, should be considered conservative. Trip generation estimales from the 13RCPA EIS can be found in Attachmrnl B of Appendix Em Volume II of the Dr,1ft EIS. 1 -Uy 2030, no increase in additional development is assumed within Sub-district t A. However, due to future additional redevelopment within Sub-district 1B betu.·ten 2015 and 2030 more vehicle trips within Sub-district JA would intemahze \Vithin the site area. As such, a slight reducuon in total off-site trip generation by redevelopment in Sub-distnct 1A 1s expected by 2030 over those levels estimated in 2015. This characteristic 1s consistent with the trip generation methodologies and assumptions apphed in the BRCPA E[S. Although an estimated increase in entering p.m. peak hour trips (368 p.m. peak hour trips) is estimated to result by 2015 with redevelopment under the cumulative buildout of The Landing and the Boeing Conceptual Plan versus those levels evaluated in the BRCPA EIS, the significant reduction in estimated exiting trips from the site (nearly 1,090 p.m. peak hour trips) would on an overaU basis result in less trip generation and improved intersection levels of service as compared to those reported in the BRCPA EIS. Therefore, based upon this comparative analysis, cumulative redevelopment proposed in Sub-district lA and 1B would result in less peak hour vehicle trip generation as compared to the trip generation reported and evaluated in the 2003 EIS for this portion of the Boeing Renton Plant site. As such, there would be no differences in probable significant traffic impacts or mitigation needs from redevelopment under the proposed Plans as compared to those disclosed in the BRCPA EIS; and cumulative redevelopment in Sub-district 1A and 1 B would be within the range of EIS alternatives and associated impacts addressed in the 2003 EIS. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May 1, 2006 Page 5 Infrastructure Comparison In addition to the trip generation analysis above, key transportation planning assumptions and infrastructure needs outlined in the BRCP A EIS were reviewed to identify whether any significant changes have occurred since the Final EIS was issued in October, 2003. The infrastructure needs comparative analysis was conducted using Network B -Baseline -"'etwork 2015 from the Draft EIS (see pages 35-36 and Figure 15 of Appendix E in Volume II of the Draft EIS). Network B assumes that the transportation network essentially remains as it is today, v.sth the inclusion of certain planned, local roadway improvements identified in the City of Renton's Transportation Improvement Program, transit service itnprovements and non-motorized facility itnprovements. :--Jo improvements to the regional freeway system arc assumed for this network, consistent with the EIS assumption for Network B. Three main transportation infrastructure needs were outlined in the EIS: • Intersections • Arterials • Freeway 1\ccess Subsequent to the EIS, the Boeing Company and the City of Renton entered into a Development Agreement in December 2003. Based on this agreement, the City is completing design engineering and will be constructing improvements to the local roadway system that will serve the Sub-district 1A and 1B redevelopment area and provide a basic street grid system v.1thin the sub-districts. This includes improvements to Logan Avenue, Park Avenue, North 8'h Street and North 10'h Street to be implemented by the City, as well as certain on-site access and circulation improvements to be constructed by the applicants. These planned improvements to the local road system will provide capacity at a level that is higher than required to serve only Sub-district 1A and 1B redevelopment in 2015 or 2030. Per the EIS, this through "public street" system was not required to support redevelopment levels evaluated in the EIS for Sub-districts JA and 1B by 2015 or 2030; instead, these improvements were required to support the redevelopment of that portion of the EIS study area west of Logan Avenue N., defined as District 2. Specifically, the City planned improvements include initial arterial segments and key intersections constructed along: ), N 8'" Street (reconstruction between Logan Avenue and Park Avenue) )-N 10"' Street (a new arterial between Logan Avenue extension and Garden Avenue) )-Logan Avenue ( extension from N 6>h Street to Park A venue) )-Park Avenue (realigned to provide a new T-intersection with Logan Avenue extension). The following provides a comparison of the identified transportation infrastructure needs in 2015 from the BRCP A EIS with the needs of cumulative buildout of Sub-districts 1A and 1B (Subareas A, B and C in the EIS). As identified above, given the significant reduction in vehicles estimated to exit the site under redevelopment proposed in Sub-district JA and 1B by The Landing Master Plan and the Boeing Con«ptual Plan, all infrastructure needs identified in the BRCP A EIS would either be mitigated through Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May 1, 2006 Page 6 these reductions or as part of the planned transportation improvements 1.o be implemented by the City of Renton or the applicants. Intersection Needs Y Location: Intersection t/10/1111 (Park Drive/I-405 NB/SB Ramps). Identified Dcficiencv: Eastbound volumes exiting the site. l\1itigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Reconfigure northbound access ramp and possible changes to southbound ra1np junction to accommodate access changes. Conclusion: Reductions in exiting site traffic that would result from cumulative redevelopment under the Sub-district lA and lB plans would completely mitigate impacts to these intersections and the interchange system; therefore, the improvements identified in the EIS would not be required. Y Location: Intersection #12 (Park Dr/LWB/Garden Ave). Identified Deficiency: Westbound left turns and eastbound through volumes. l\1itigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Remove westbound left turns at the intersection. Conclusion: With implementation of the City's proposed changes to the intersection (addition of another westbound left turn only lane), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOSE with cumulative redevelopment of Sub-district li\. and lB in 2015; therefore, cumulative redevelopmern impacts would be fully mitigated at this intersection. Y Location: Intersections #13, #14, and #15 (Park Ave/10th, Boulevard of Champions/727 Avenue, Park Ave/8th). Identified Deficiency: General site access improvements to address congestion. l'vlitigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Turn lanes and intersection approach widening to accorrunodate site access. Conclusion: All site access improvements and internal roadway infrastructure will be cotnpleted by the City and the applicants to provide adequate site access and mitigate deficiencies at these intersections; no further i.tnprovements would be required. Y Location: Intersection #20 (Park Ave/N 6th Street). Identified Deficiency: Southbound right turning movements. l\1itigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Construct a separate southbound right-turn only lane. Conclusion: The construction of Park Avenue/Logan Avenue as a "thru street" by the City will mitigate impacts to this intersection. Therefore, the deficiency identified in the EIS at this intersection would be fully mitigated. Note: L!cations and Intersection codes refirem,d above are_found in J7igure 3.10-3 on page 3.10-6 o/the Draji EIS. Arterial Needs };;>, Location: Park Avenue Identified Deficiency: Directional vollllnes exiting the site (eastbound). l\1itigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Potential arterial widening. Conclusion: Planned City infrastructure improvements and reductions in exiting site traffic that would result due to cumulative redevelopment under the Sub-district lA and 1 Il plans would completely mitigate impacts to this arterial. Therefore, no widening to Park Avenue between the site and the I-405 interchange would be required. Transponation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (BBB) 220-7333 The Landing Trip Generation Comparison with BRCPA EIS May I, 2006 )"'" Location: Bronson \Vay Identified Deficiency: Directional volumes exiting the site (southbound). l'vlitigation Improvement Identified in the ElS: Potential arterial \videning. Page 7 Conclusion: Reductions in exiting site traffic that would result fro1n cumul2tivc rcc.levelopment under the Sub-district !A and 1B plans would completely mitigate impacts to this arterial. Therefore, no ,videoing to Bronson Way over the Cedar River would be reguired. Freeway Access Needs Location: 1-405/Park Avenue Interchange -NB On-Ramp Identified Deficiency: Directional volumes exiting the site onto northbound l-405. Mitigation Improvement Identified in the EIS: Potential interchange reconfiguration or direct access ramps. Conclusion: Reductions in exiting site traffic that would result from cumulative redevelopment under the Sub-district !A and ll:l plans would completely mitigate impacts to this interchange system. Therefore, the existing l-405/Park Avenue interchange would not require any improvements to support cumulative redevelopment under Sub-district !A and 1B. Based upon the review of key transportation planning assumptions and infrastructure needs outlined in the BRCP A EIS, no additional infrastructure improvements would be requited to support cumulative development under the Sub-district 1 A and 1 B plans as compared to those levels of infrastructure improvements assumed within the EIS. Current plans for Sub-districts !A and !Il redevelopment would result in a significant reduction in peak hour vehicle trip generation, as compared to the trip generation reported and evaluated in the 2003 EIS. In addition, the City intends to construct improvements to the local roadway system that would serve redevelopment levels beyond build-out of Suh-districts !A and 1B. , thcrefote, the remaining development within Sub-district 1B that is assumed to be constructed after 2015 (390,000 sguare-feet in office and laboratory/technology uses) would not result in significant impacts nor require additional infrastructure improvements. Lastly, if redevelopment of Sub-district 1B is considered as a standalone project in comparison to cumulative redevelopment assumed by 2015 in Sub-districts !A and 1!:l, there would be no changes in conclusions regarding transportation impacts or infrastructure needs. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (BBB) 220-7333 Attachment A Detailed Project Trip Generation Estimates Draft for Review Boeing Renton Plant -Subarea 1 b Redevelopment 2015 Comparative Trip Generation Levels of Net Off-Site Trip Generation BRCPA EIS Peak Period AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Difference from Subarea C (BRCPA EIS) nter Xlt ota Nme: These compansons do not consider additional mode split adJustments rnadt· in the top generation estimates l'vah.:::ued in the BRCP:\ EIS, and therefore, should be considered conserYat.Jve Transportation Engineering Northwest 3/28/2006 Attachment A Page 2 Draft for Review Boeing Renton Plant -Subarea 1 a& 1 b Redevelopment 2015 Comparative Trip Generation Levels of Net Off-Site Trip Generation Peak Period AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour BRCPA EIS nter The Landing and Boeing Concept Plan (2/20<>§1 Difference from Subarea A, B & C (BRCPA EIS) ota .44 645 Note: These comparisons do not considt-r ;idditinml mode split ;i_Jjustments m:i.de in the trip generation estimates cYaluatcd m the BRCPA EL\ and therefore, should be considered consen'ative. Transportation Engineering Northwest 3/28/2006 Attachment A Page 3 Draft for Review Boeing Renton Plant -Subarea 1 b Redevelopment 2030 Comparative Trip Generation Levels of Net Off-Site Trip Generation Boeing Concept Plan (2/2006) Peak Period Enter Exit Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour :\lotc: These comparisons do not consider additional mode spht adjustmencs made in the trip generation estimates enluated m the BR.CPA EIS, and therefore, should be consiJercd con~en'atlve. Transportation Engineering Northwest 3/28/2006 Difference from Subarea C (BRCPA EIS) xTt olal Attachment A Page 5 Draft for Review Boeing Renton Plant -Subarea 1 a& 1 b Redevelopment 2030 Comparative Trip Generation Levels of Net Off-Site Trip Generation The Landing and Boeing Concept Plan (2/2006) Peak Period Enter Exit Total I Enter I Exit Alternative 1 · No Action AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour :'Jotc: These compansons do not consider additmnal mode split adjustmems made in the trip generatinn estimate~ evi\luatcd in the RRCP ;\ EIS, and therefore, should be considered conserntive Transportation Engineering Northwest 3/28/2006 ota Difference from Subarea A, B & C (BRCP~EIS} nter xTt otal -,,586 -642 Attachment A Page 6 Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment face Page \ .11 ~ k I(• COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by File No.: NCS-368221-WA 1 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months a~er the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First Ameria,n Title Insurance Company By: Attest: ' _/ ~:/ .,~'.{_:~J/do- / / / President /J110,i, j:__ IC~ Secretary By: ~T ~ Countersigned First American Title Insurance Company form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-368221-WA! Page No. 1 To: First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 (206)728-0400 -(800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348 Donna F. Koerber (206)615-3021 dkoerber@firstam.com Perkins Coie, LLP 1201 Third Ave Seattle, WA 98101 Attn: Michael A. Barrett SCHEDULE A Moniqueje Schmitt-Johnson (206)615-3141 mschmittjohnson@firstam.com File No.: NCS-368221-WAl Your Ref No.: Lakeshore Landing, Lot SA 1. Commitment Date: September 04, 2008 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX Standard Owner's Coverage $ 15,475,000.00 $ To Follow $ To Follow Proposed Insured: Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No.: NCS-368221-WA! Page No. 2 LOT SA, BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2, A BINDING SITE PLAN, RECORDED JANUARY 11, 2008 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20080111000854, IN VOLUME 246, PAGES 1 THROUGH 3, OF PLATS, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS-368221-WA! Page No. 3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F_ Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-368221-WAl Page No. 4 SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%. Levy/Area Code: 2100 2. 3. 4. For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2005: • A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions; • A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the excise tax due. General Taxes for the year 2008. Tax Account No.: 088661-0010-03 Amount Billed: $ 5,944.72 Amount Paid: $ 2,972.36 Amount Due: $ 2,972.36 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 608,000.00 Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: April 23, 1942 under Recording No. 3235807 In Favor of: The Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Wisconsin corporation For: Spur Track Affects: as described therein Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 16, 1962 under Recording No. 5453013 In Favor of: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington For: Sewer pipe lines system Affects: as described therein First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment 5. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: March 18, 1997 Recording No.: 9703181422 File No.: NCS-368221-WAl Page No. 5 Said instrument is a re-record of Recording No. 9612120855, recorded on December 12, 1996. 6. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Development Agreement", executed by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded August 2, 2002 as Instrument No. 20020802000224 of Official Records. 7. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Development Agreement", executed by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded December 10, 2003 as Instrument No. 20031210001637 of Official Records. 8. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the Boeing Lakeshore Landing Binding Site Plan recorded December 23, 2004 under Recording No. 20041223000856 and also in Volume 225 of Plats, Pages 83 through 86, in King County, Washington. Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded March 14, 2007 as Recording No. 20070314001933 of Official Records. 9. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: December 28, 2004 Recording No.: 20041228001871 10. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan recorded January 11, 2008 under Recording No. 20080111000854, in King County, Washington. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA·S (6/76) Commitment 11. Mechanics Lien. Claimant: Against: Amount: For: Date Work Commenced: Date Work Ceased: Recorded: Recording No.: Straight Line Striping, Inc. Millennium Building Co. $4,221.70 Labor and/or Materials and/or Equipment October 1, 2007 October 18, 2007 January 11, 2008 20080111001220 File No.: NCS·36822l·WA1 Page No. 6 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded January 18, 2008 as Recording No. 20080118001094 of Official Records. Affects: The land and other property. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions and stipulations of the Partnership Agreement of Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership . A copy of the current agreement and all amendments must be submitted prior to closing. Any conveyance or encumbrance of the Partnership property must be executed by all of the General Partners. Note: If the proposed transaction involves a sale of all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets the written consent of all of the Limited Partners should be submitted, prior to closing. 13. Matters which may be disclosed by a search of the records against the name(s) of the general/managing partner(s) of the partnership named below, provided said matters represent partnership obligations. Partnership: Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership 14. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. First American 77tle Insurance Company Form WA·S (6176) Commitment INFORMATIONAL NOTES File No.: NCS·l68221·WA1 Page No. 7 A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. C. Toe description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. Toe full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. Lot SA, Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2, BSP Rec. 20080111000854 APN: 088661-0010-03 D. According to the application for title insurance, title is to vest in Duke Realty Limited Partnership, an Indiana limited partnership. Examination of the records discloses no matters pending against said party(ies). E. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B First American Title Insurance Company Form WA·S (6/76) Commitment First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Setvices COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations File No.: NC5·36822l·WA1 Page No. 8 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or ( c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA·S (6/76) Commitment The First American Corporation First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Se/Vices PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information File No.: NCS· 368221 ·WA! Page No. 9 In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial infonnatton. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon whJCh of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and· • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffillatcd party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by !aw. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal mformation hsted above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include finanoal service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved m real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even 1f you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthonzed parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you, We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and first American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved First Amencan Title Insurance Company I I:/ ,' ,. ii '1!: -. ": -' ' ' i -; f >HIit (:U '"' ~.; -' ----' l.f? at-H•lO- llOUlUot UWIOOfft i ' j -~- M = " " .... = " = " " " .... " H'U "" '""' Olli '""' "" .... , "" Ill'! "" u,o, '"' ..... "" S1'01 O]S5 ~ Qj 0 i~ §' i .p ,-----#---- / s ~ 0 ' ief-----------~ fi S: LOT 5 ":' .,, ... 10 - '::' 1>101 I "" ""' "" fl~ ~7( ' ' it :l ' !3 'I ,.. " " " " '" ~ 1000 nfl .. ~ ... ... .... .,, = "" = .. oo ., OH> >000 I ____ _L " ' -., ,. :1 ' ,. " .., ... .. ~ " ,.. ,oai 1 09$11\t ,ooo ... = H09 uG "" = '"" J ""' = , ...• 1 ~ .. ' l PCL A "' I i I 4 ;e.· P0..6 l 1.UAC "" I 10.ll i.. lfO~lll{Jl-10" ltltOMH1l·l' XI JO JJ, ~· Mlr " -= " !ll~ .. ., " 41Jl I -.... " uu -= " Ul2 ""' ,p-;-~ ' lOl. 5 " n-•o-•i 1 -. .,, "" ' ' - ' ' i l ! - ' ' l ' ' ,_ " " " ,su ~· . i , I l ' / ,": j1 ' ( I . ' j I rf! Ci ------~-,;] _f ----- --··--------- '"" • l $ .. "• -' .... -. -· , . I J · I / ..... F • . ::: : ;: . -· " ' I i: ,,,{ i'! ,:..~ .l H ~i--~= · I i-r,, -----1· : 0 ·f:l' 0 I :i' I. ::··-~ I ~ f"C.•,'-"'lf•'-"':::_;_"" ~ • ,, .. ,'. ~ , I ;! iJ .. ""'· • ,::; ,,.. = ./ •• ~=t1 = , -t ~ } '---..... +--'.._ r_·_,. .-,.-"' • . ;~--~ li~:j r.-i'.,.----...---,' . ::.·. -1 'I --RENTON: fAR!,,1 , ... CR~GE ' : ---"'··- -. --- -------~--- -· ' ' 'I . 8 ,. 0 ·- _, _"] --~ ~-' 1 ·--_,..,.~------· , , ,,, •. WWOI' . ' ,..;; .,-, ---·, . ,, ,, : :; ' )t ii' " . ------- -~------ i, ii :, ' I ~ i ,/ .I ~ ...... Jr·· ,-.. i . i ,,n ' u . ' , . 'I ' l! : :i: ' /i ·_. i ... :i,, "' I p / § i ! ... J. ,j!.t 0 # J C, ' ,,,o '. l I I -l . I . = ·) 0 -·-" I 1: : --"'.\!':'."~ ' 'n -... i; ... ·:c~--~ .... ~~:-:":.'. ;,;;:_·.:.,;.;::... '- Ii'. 1, ~ t1 .. ',::' ' I II ·, I ~ 8 "'' jiu.~··: :~:ii, ' ' ,:,> ': .. -·· ,. .•. 1 I~ ---.· ..:;t-<' -I . ~1-::•• -::,. I ! .: • -~-l · ,r::-. ;:-:: ·•-~ -:: r 1·=· '"'"" ..... ., ... ~, I I "": ·-· j' ; ·--· : C• _;;_ -~-' ·:-:,,_. •. r --;---=·, ~·_. •-._:J· -. -. • • • ~ • • ,• -' i • • •• , • e• • < ., ; -•. .• = •... ..;. ' " ,;;., #I i. -• =' ,. -~ -; . = 'e; ,;'' ~ -;:•, I •• = '=' h"' • a! . . "'' :, . ·= c ' ~ it.;;,:'.·=·-~~ , .. :""'ii ._ .:. :, ·.= ·-·· _ ·=· 0 11---->-." ,.:.;;_· : •• -• • :I • -• _, • • •• 'I i'~·... ,r.:1.;; ~-. I 1-¥' ~ j • -• =' :-~ • J ' ,,-.·, fnec ~ ' • "-• •• i O = • ., I---': " ' i I f;;_:;'_,..~..".'..J ... • • ' • ' . ·-• =· :-c ~ __ , ' ' ' ,. . -• :,• . ·=· ~ ' :, ,";';'-' -,·--....,J i. I • •-•--' -,' -·-•--_;;·,~_,.,,'sf.-: , ; ,: .;•M,•i :, :<,..: .,, . , "u ., ,. ~~ y ... :., ' --L.i. r·. ,;:::--:.· .-·•1· L ·-···· -~- , .• = ¥:· . ..,, • =-. . ·_:;, i,......,, ,_;;: ' . i I , ,:-e. "'~°"' "-< ~ 1i . , . . . i i II ;_, ;fj,'.:; j ~ ~ :.: I~ ,it:_·_. j •:::·~-=,): :: ·.: -: : --f-C.--E • ' • ,/ _,· -• a'1 · ,. • ~· ~ -•· = , · ·· I ., II f i' I I . ·:: .. ,i: h{ ·-· ,--~ •--, "· -:I'• ;;;,} I.,~ -:: 1' ;~:'.Hr~_!, • 0 -•• •e• ~' '" 0 r. _-, ."-... , r,, ,..a• • ::,-. L--::-W--=:-:.J ---· = cc··· ... , ••. , ~ :1·1-::.,_· r.:· ~ ~ -· ,· •• ~-. t·.l-•..:: ·:' '-~ : ;_: :: ': iY;;/.; : : . ti-:· · .,. " ··" · -t:'£ ~ ._:.:· ...,. I! . " .. -~ ~:~· ~~: ti r~·=· .• :. :.=-§; ~- :::-.· - .... . J I 0 REN'TO~ FARM ACREAGE ,' 'I I '' 1--... , - w --~--~------=----.L' --·::..:___' . ' , . :, (,) 0 -~ ·I •. "-:_·. i I , I ,, . !", • ..... I ' '·. j J -----=--.----~ ----- -,, 0 • lftTOTORY nJlbiftY DUD For Ten Dollars ($10.00) and oth"°-good and valuable consideration, the receipt and surticiency of which b: bereby acknm,rledged by Granter I the Granter, Parkside Partnership, a wasliington general partnership, hereby conveys and warrantG to The ~ .Boeing Collpally, a Delaware carpor4tion, the real property described SO:: ' as follows: deed That portion of the south 660 feet of the northwest qua~ter of tbe southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23 Horth, Range 5 East, W.K., in King Cowtty, Wcsbington, vbicb lies north of the north line of Korth Sixth Street and betv"en tha northerly extension of t..be centerline of Pelly Avenue Korth and Kain Street, nov Wells Street North; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to the city of Renton by recorded. August 19, 1971, und~ff Recordi nq: Huaber 7li08190]52. This conveyance is aade expressly subject to the following aatters: 1. Real property taxes, conservation Charges and. public assesS1Nnts, it· any, beco•inq due after t.be date of thio Deed. 2. Ea.se-.ents ~nd th~ teras and conditions th~re~f recorded under ,:;ing county Recording Nos. 3432120, JU2121, 7311290292, 7705020589, T/0Bl 7073), 7710030507 ~ 7711180856~ 8512160947, "§ 8512160949 and 8612031'34. • 11ICIZ(N:ll~J?l. Tli.1-itl{.-.cll,....lallll5 ·•· ''"" C 0 C g u'liJ • C G C " G .. r- ~ " " ~ ' • 0 ' 0 • " " • • ~ "' -~ ' ' i I I • • J ' l l I _•. ~· (I) ..,. 111 ... " 0 ... 0 1/) :1) • -,.,- 0 0 • 3. Su=-vey exceptions disclosed by Exception Mo. 34 in Transaaerca Title Insut"ance Co-itaent No. 863073, Survey Job I 75066, dated Dec.e.ber 8, 1994, prepared by Raisa i Hohaberg, Inc. Doted: January 4, 1995. (Grantor} Parkside Partnership, a Washington general partnership ~~- Michael R~stro, Partner ·•· ' ' ..-) ''"" • • tl \ :; i ~ I I I • • I i,. Ir _...., ____________ ~ -~--,...------,-,,-~,,,-==---... ..,..-.,,,_....,_._~~-- • --/I 0 • STATE OF WASHINGTON 66, COONT'l OF KING i On this {ti day of J;inuary 1 199S, before .... the undersigned, a Notary P'Qblic in and for the State of Wasb.ington, dtlly co-iasioned and &Vorn per&onally appear-ad Eugene Horbacb and Mich.ael R. Mastro, lol9'm to -.e to be the pairtners of ParJu.ide Partnership, the partner~ip that executed. the foregoing instruaent, and acknovledg~ the said instr.ment to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said p,o.rtnersbip, for the JUXPQ&es therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were ac.thorized to execute said iIUJt{"Ullent. I certify tbat I kJ . .::w or have satisfactory evidence that the persons appearing before. ae and making thia •cknovledg;aent are the persons vboae true aigna.tures appear on thie docuaent. WIT'tfi!SS ay band and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above tte~. Print H~ 1 NOTARY POBLit in a for ¥ashington, esid"ng at Ky ~1s~io ires _,_ "''" l I ' ' I I • • L _,2-lr ____________ _.;;.:__ W"HH, n~C:OROE'O "~ r,;AN ()l!loe al"'~ :;,tyC'•"" F\antnri Ci; Ma'I 11)55 Swth G'll<lY WGY !ieeluo V,,A \l!ID~& BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BIHDIHCl SITE PLAN SE 114 SlCf !, TWP 23N RGE 5E. WM SVV 114 SECT 8. TWP 23 N .. RGE 5£. ll'/M CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WIISHINGTON '"'~ "' .-'c(.'~~, ~( ,, .. fl[ ~~[5(~'5 'hSI "'-·. ~,, J''D[N':.'GN£C ot-,,li:R5 er ·~'!."C~:-1~· TH["-~~ ~l~.J.:,,· Vts(."~&,:.> w rl1;'RC~Y MAK[ A ar,·o,M:; .s,rr PU~ P~RS,IAN' ro CHA~.,~ ;~; i '~A\ "'1·(;·.,~,e~~~t',\,."",~~:~~~·:Nt}~f ii;:,\:2, eg~~p;~ '!tjg!~·~;.,;g:. Z,,,~~i _1r_c.~,-c• ,.,[,'()""f~~ · • · · · I 2. -I 7 -2.. 0 q'__J______ ~OvN'Y (),-LOS Al<G[ll5 i S'i CJ<-.·~.ri . ic.Q! uL.-c,;,t -'l ~~--.,r.,A;;.• ouR,1c. Pf_~sc,,,,,, f:f~~~b~~r~TI7tftt:.'"6rt:~':f~£~~;~·::;J~ih~i{f:t.:z·r;~f:~J7?sf,,~4 1;~1 5,:;~,,.w, ':/'J '"'I .,,,.~.,[~-.~, PH',.O•: .,~ '"[ ,,:nv FY, Bfr•c• o,-'""'(."H 'H' Di~sGI, ,i'f,) . ,·rrc,·crn h•f ·~5·,,u.,,N, · ~'""1/;"S "' ~•','.) A,,'() ',,., •a; '''" c:rY o• R[,'-l·fo~ ADM1N1s rRA !OR PJ:iN,'.i,NG / aurL01Nc / PUBLIC WORKS ,· ,,' r~,,,.,,,c •~D PP'<O;[O liu oi("~' ,~ ., rb,0 (1)' 0 "<:s _ z_tp __ c DAY,--,,-p.;c: • ..,. "<-" ,o~] .#si'f!,"ffr,. t~~. KIN(, cour,rY DFP/\RTl;l[,'-/T :::.,1 ASS[S.SMU,'TS. '<ol''•,C.' A~~ •~P~l;.'[C T,,'\ _ lu.i.._ C>av (J,',~f-· .,-· • 20~ '.Jc.ct+ NcQ:c .. . . . ,;(~~ccJ!hcc,c'!'~.L'-'~- ,·v, . p,.~" '\)> \~fJ~ ;,, PI ' e·~~ C (~•N')' ; i'.,fj)(J/l Li.'A-07-048-BSP L,~D ·.35-DGl6 I. ·.c.i _,. ·: I I ' : ::;1 L[GA/ Q[.SCR.IPT/QN QF [XIST!NC f'P.B.CQ..S (8R'i: ... (~,CA~ n;;;-r~5!,'RANC[ co .. PAN' cc""'IIA[.~' NO. NC"3-2~Bl~l-lt•• J~"l:9 >[8R~'Ai<Y 18, WP) PARCi:.c'.' 8 ~ ANO f AR[ h/)T A PAO' or n,,5 8IN0"'C s,'c ;>lA4 WT A, :;-<TY 0. RENnJN SHORT >'[AT NV.,9fil D•J-89, Pfe(Ml)ffi 4')V(~0[.0 l4, 198• UNO!c~ ~,~c CO~"·" R,CORO,NC NC B91H49006 C(" omcrAI RCCD'lOS. ~R"lPI rr1.r "ORll0,1 CONV,'CO T') "1£ G,H 0( RE:HON OY ou,r C~A, .. DECO l>fGORDCO ~Ol'l'IA~l~ ~-·~o~ .·~0!:FI Rf.CORO/NG ~o 891!0PC<1J Of' 0,FICU[ RffQRP!.. JN ~J'-/G co:,r,c• "'AS~INGCON •:~·o ,x:;~P)W(i f>'!R(>H:.W .... AC PORT,QN ~ONVc'TO TG "'" Cifr or ,,[,,ro,.. s• OEW RECD<?LJt.D w~u~· ,.,, J:.x)f! U,W,f.R ACCORDING ~·c ,iJ:J60Bt7(]{)0Y1~ IN ,w:c GO<.'~'>'. WA~~,NGr-:>~ LO'~'· l, J, 4 MIU J. ScLJC~ J. RCNnJN FM/1,1 AOl(ACf, ACCOROINa ''.) '"' ~IAf ;HtRtOf ~ll"(JRUC'.J IN VULU;</: t2 c" PI_Ars._ CA:;( J7, /~ X,N.;; CO,',tY. WA$1ff~.;f(JN UGl"' flfl.l't(Flr,>r, ;~f ,VQPC!< JO_(X) Ff_[/ OF SAi~ ,OT ' CON'lfr/,') ro ~·r 01Y OI H[NIQN •r;,, ,,~,t• ~VRPOO£S-. V~()E(I 1'ECORDING NO ~·~MM or orrmA, P(CORD5 AlSO l"/((;;£P1 )),Ar f'()Rf,'()N CON\'E:"1:D ro Cl<[ C'Tr C(" /![~CON a, Y)JAf JNS"'~l,l(NT IIFCOl!Dcl) P!.~H•~E/! ;~. ;/(>')ii 1.mD[A RE~OADJNG ~G wo,;,i,iooc;J8 IN ~.'N~ CWN;Y, WA5'1tM,TQ~ /()<;1.//f~~ "'"' r,<£ N(}Rl>< ><ALF OF VAGAi'fO NOQTr' 71" srnETr AUJ(;>jN1NC ANO rHAr P0,,71()1,1 '.:fr Ml<" A[/.J(JWrNG ON )If; ""'";' Ar VAC~ffD ~NDfJI c:r. OF Jl[},TJN OROJN~NC[ ,VO. J-.119 A~O RECQRDED p.(aY ''· 1979 ,.mor,r ,we ~OUNIY "iCOQDl~'G NO. }~0~:1106''] "' o,nc,A, "fCO"O'i. •. ~ ,-..~c co~~ rv . .,.,_,,.,,,c,oN ', -· Till';~'Qq/. JOOOv_l11r (l/ 0 •:hit '"' 1000--Jn,1,JI Cef ,'>lR'><•f"'f(/i,ARfF~OF "10 ~or,n,~s, Q!,ARn:t> (If 51;"Cf/O.N B. TOWNSritP lJ NO~Tr,. RM'V. 5 £ASr. \\Oci.A.,[TT( MERID.'A.V, N ~IN~ CQVNrY,,:WASlf,N:;TQI, FXCFPT PirRffRQo.! T1/t ~Ql>f/i 60.00 •ctr '"L~((),, (."QW!:YE~ ,o ,,_, C'l.'Y 0' ~[r,r()~ co~ ';1flfff "Ufl"OSl:"S Wl~£R ~[COl'J•NG Nur.(~[~ ~·Boa~~ OF orr:c:-<t RU:-0"0S. A,'<;() ix.:rer ;Kl'R[fROM fHA' POP''{).~ 'hCJl[C.)f LYING"''"'""''»!:$' ·100 Fi:£' v• f><ATF'QROC,.,_'r,r S.o:ro NQl>T/, JQO[)()F[[f['1NC, ~(JV/><(H(Y 0, ,,,, c,r, (,C ,,,rnE TNNS.,,,$5Jc,,i u,r 11rd•'-or-.. n, ;,</JCd ~A5 ocrnrn '0 {If£ ("JrY "' ~Fh'TO~ e~ DEC) ~I{{f;f.-i{0,S;}/J~';.°'1;f;A ~0,,J/JJJJ!,?c'~ o:;:'f~ir~~~rx:g~;H! cu o, ~wroe, ev OffO P(::;/jqJ[Q JIJ/J( 7_ •99~ <.WQ{P. ~ECY'OINC NO. il"O!iO!O~l~ '.;" :.,,-,,,;,A( R(CORDS AcSO ucor 7HA1°?Cfln~'CGNV['([1),fD_ "1[ C/fY OF ~[NU:)N,/jY ""' ,~·Sf)l(,p.((NT PFCOSD£0 0[G[OJ8~.<1 "· 2<)(/t i!NOrJ~ ~FWPOII-/C NO ~1)0~'2':/ilQOJJ~ ·~::k:N_o :,v,.,·, )i'A)~rNCTC''1 ,ors· r <ND {"~C :or u,,/.o~~;;;;.;,._ WJ a6ii-B!l. Si_IT,</t[O "0.K"B[~ :6, :JllB ~~G,R ~U:.t,IW'>/C "" aB'1'6lX1 OF nmr.•,: ''ITOl'D>, •°!' ~.~c.; ~ut:r,. WA',H"CTON . . . :-co· '· !lcOC~ ,, 'R[WON c•et,t •c·~[AG[ •ov,n'-"'. •GCORQING _10 "'" Pc•: n.,-r,rn• ~o"CG~DEO IN .;,;Jcwr ,, GI .!'~~;c,. P•G[ JJ .. '~ KIN',, mvur,c;· WASh!NCTO,,. ~~'76rv.,.,;;n~~.,~?J'';:./::~.~,!J",,t~;i':R ~O•'.';' '"' s:mr '"·"'~'~c. AS 1'4CA'!:P ALSQ''rOGfT>!~ "'"' ':'fAT ?O~,,DN or ,,_;__;:v •DJ0"''·"G Of( Tiff IT(_c,,: VAC;rrn ~~'O[R :,rr Of" "![~fO'/ ONU:NA""'~--"'~ •O<B. A~"(} R[CQf'Drn .,,~t~ 11. P9Rl c'•iOfR R[CQRQ,Nr;; ,VQ, MD..lllO)l,\. oc O'H(."IA[ R(~oROS PAPCFc • -t WT 2, BcOC~ •• R[N~O:..-"F,ii, ,m~,iG[ ,..;,j;1ac.v. •CCQROWG ro ,~, P(S, f'1C3f.GF R[CQRQ[D jN VO!.CJMf );> OC,P/_AT'i, l'PCf l'l, •N ,CWG COC'~PY. "'A'>"ING'OIJ. TIJCf"1fil "'"' r>u, OORnoil·(1r ~;;n AD.IO'Nll<G.(iN rhC ,11';r, VACA:CJ UMlf• c,--Y o, •[~TON ORO,.v,vcr ~o «i<s.,;.'-lr;; /!f.C~orn ~RClf 11 '~~, CNJIR H(C:JRDJNG ~o e,oJ,,0578 or C("'1C.'AC ~[CQROS [OT~ AND m,cr p IIC/(1.~G IAnS~QR[ c>Nii~c. A i,tNC/l~C s•:r P(.N, RfCGRDfO 0[~£M8[11 lJ, 2DD< UNO[R ~fCOll~•NC NO 2QQ4'21J0Ci0~)0, ',S '/()(~~[ U5. PAC[5 BJ nwoucr &>. o~ P'.HS i:x~,Pr l'r'Af POR1'0,.' C0rJV[<£J CQ "';-<[ ~.r,-()I" Rr,·ro~ D' "'" INS'll(,r.([~'' n'C~~QE,:, Uffo~a,~ ,2. iooo V4N;R R[C)ilOll<C NO '°'"'"""DOD11~. IN ~,,;r; CO(J~'JY, .,.,,.. .. ~~",., VICINITY MAP . --·-· --------- I Qa" o• -·--.-, C.C P[~'\ ~(' ~.I&L.~ ,~~~!J}r:3;rjc:?i:ft6~"~~\%.~,,, ,r,,_ .• . ,• .-... ONUl,(~','(TS $H01+!'/ M"H[ \IT!,';10:C JN Ff.9 :/'.JQ{" Pi>'"AA\-'. .. ,A~(!~E!J[/,ff ro•,:'f',.,[h1 ,' -~,P.<lfl_"i". 11.'.l<l G~s. ,~u l<iC" rr.r"' srn~O!\, H•<f" 0:-r~ (:;>,IPA~[~ re) A/JU A'..!M~fl'"J AGA,'"'5"! ~·;•H".-fy V.cl!,lr<A'!IJ H .. ~[l'~t. "''H'N 1nt,,•s:_1vR ' N I s- SCAU:_ 'JI) 1 ~68Jc~ ,-. '.i !/, C,CC~'S i;-,n1u11·- ;,.~!,~(;,;y ,.,,;, r< 2'.'9 BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE Pl.AH S[ 1t4SECT ?, TWP 23N.RCF 5E WM SW 114 SECT 8, TWP 23N. RGE 5E, 'NM CtTY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOT5A ·, 5rg,c~-. sq ''. r4.,21 cr:,e< CIT"( {IF R(NTON "URVfY CQ~ nrs TO l"•" OF Rt"O"TON 5VRCfY ~U,,.'PlDL llf''t•'Yi~ '"'O,.'LJ~lNr$ AS $H~..-, ON Sheil> 2 <.a[) j r5 C~ ~l'/L~•N(, \"~ ~crJ.<·,,., 70.Q•~ S' "'~s2~·v w 1, .. 11,1· ;.~~g ,a·5,T ~,-~ Q9)-~9) R~rnvri S 0 ' '!~! /:!') ~9fl'4YCUci I I y ~-: I y _, 11 11 LT sso,~·~,·~ . .1<.88' U S0>l)6"1o·w. P<.}I u Sl«l~·:;.:,·t. J.Jo' '---------- LOT 78 J?0,67J·:•..' 5 C7 ~c 11111111111111 20080111000854 ~mru!l(T"" I\.Ol ... " :1 ... ~.~J' ' BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 • BINDING SITE PLAN SE 1/4 SECT. 7. rNP. 23/1/. RGE 5E ';'IM SW 114 SECT 8. TWP 23 N. RG[' 5£, W.M CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Rf~'/6N •o.1,v ACRC.AC[: V0L.,12/J7 1:\tJCK 2 .. ---~--JC7D <" >' <" C<J<,/C "OIJU.,fN f ;N CA->/. W/ C(IPPfR Pr~· AT S"'[[f iNV/~[Cf'\)N ) ;~;::/re · .. -. : ... ,:-'.·.·,: ==:· B.[CQRO .L'35£M£NJS ... NW A(;R{'[MFN1 'i 5B1"2B")2"[ 2~50;]"7,;, coRrii"C.,,, sci:"r;·· OJJ ,~· :c, ,.,ARLJlN re r..~'11 <;,:c,) BE[I:EQ.~;i _,.\.0,:~:;,,,'{ /I:c"f':' 1~1<01?r PLA, a, Q5~ f/fC .~Q :1'.11J•rN5')'){)00< 2 _.·-,.E:IJl?O Of >Ul?'"1c' ,YQ<:1J;900J H~rlOP':1/",/ O!N/,/15 &r AS~O(:,A'[O 5 PLAf o, ,,r,·rc'I rMN •rR(Aef ,U.. f2 ()f" PlAfS. PG J1 • (.OT L,NC AQ,<.'$T\l[NC llA-Q(;~ S8. R[C Nf.J 68"'6100' 5 .• orrf"if ll(t/TO~ S/i(P' ~,Ar -~09J-8>. q(c •. ,co B9""'X6 ----i, c,,, OF ~[././YO,, CQNfl>OJ. M~l'IL'"''"/ ·ao •" < •· CD/./C .,c,, "I COFPU/ P,N roJND EXIS17NG "O"v'Vf1'/T IN C•Sf, ~CC[.D',D Al' CrNT(P O' ~rcnON B-2.l-.\ N 1~.l82JG950 :,'tOJ;!'; ~'1rr (D I~---" • --~------j .. ,}~~~,:;g;f,}'..;. ,. ('.'R'ir AMf/l'CAN an_( ,,,,u:..o.'I(.'/: CO"'µ''f'(:Ol<M/)\<[~r NC.!i-2JBn'-\tA' D~,ro >faR~;qy W WO'' ~ W' SPUP 'O~C, [AS[M[IJ'., Mi:!'•NO:'j~ ).'.>80):," 0 '1~' i>tY;~f~ (,.,t·u;,,~:r;;(,'<Je~."~r:,N "' oi.SCR'P •,c)'I 5Pl.'~. m,cv ,·n !0'1~; ,1 HJ~", 9 "' ,c un:1rr"' ,;.·on,,._, fA:5[.,f,;r:,, RCC ,VOS ,02.1;:o "' J<J2•2ro ' ' G t t i 2 ' = i--i-. i I i ,JA-07-048-RSP !\ 61'· SI w,7<~.·i~w M 8,SI0~04~ 1 ""'' l'l[)-J~-(/016 ~ I~ g le' i I I ., .. ,ru, t•SV,i(NC, R[C. NO HH•n ;· --: ,2 Ml'l[/?Al R[SERVAna,.• BY PAC"lC ~0A01 '1,1o1(RQ4D GOUPA,¥, P[C ~Q .466;,'~ .'f ~ 5•J •J 5ANIY4~; S[>lf"~ f•~,-.,[Nr. ~fC. NO. l•Yl<'OO, , .-.. ,." , ' .• SA,i,T4U $["1;ri r•s, .. ;.sr RIC NO. 54"0'J (1/<->~/T(,'C,'(~/ 1/JfORMATIQr, '"'· OOCU!JE:~T TO J,T!;ril,(rC'I; .f.J<.,< o~·) "5 •o' UH(/CV f•xuu,r. "!C NO 51!19195 " ;~ ;0,';-'',;!t 5f!';~;,,H,';,;C·~~· ~t;o<;J,,2gom"' m.,cn58, 20 P(),lf.~ !•>!'"["; O[(" ~c. 77()!!1.'0JJJ, ~o, PcO'l[D r,~·."5,R,P C[.~C[O£Q a,,· A>~,9CA1(G FAU,~[$ '" ~-60 "" :01 )J) 1'-,u urrc,:v ,,:,,au(~'. "fC ~o no~o,o5lB _ .• i;_ &-,I< .;ri::rr r•;11,1fNT>. O[C NOS l'l()()JQ",CJ 4 n,ir60B.'.i6 ·. '"'" . 25 1:i' ,,NO J(;" .;n;,rr Pl'[l,/[NTS. .~[C W ,9oe,JOIPO (VACAOl)N ORO JJi1) : i~. PQ,1£~ f45[1,/[NT ,OfC NO. ~,o,i,Q.568. NOT PlG"fD r•c· 5!R,P c~,,,,_-,,_).0 (IN-<s toi:•TlJ ''CTITI[S ON<; ,o· 0, ~· ;~o or N 1.50 a/" ,a· 7•.> i, PO\!£/! ••. <;[ .. fNr Off NO ~ .. o,~o,,~, . Jl POl'lt"P i'•SC1,1FN1, RfC NC 6,:;\,1009<7 • J,' P0\0£1? [;S[UfN' RfC NO 8,~r)POOS40, NOT "'LOrrE:O, (c;:r,rraw ON •s-tOCHFD ()'C'LIC[S, JJ Uni''¥ fA5f!rlfNT. 1/[C NO tlo122J•O•J. "00,"fD VY NOC "~-B~(ltl:i~o•n J• ACCESS ANO PAR~,NG fAS[l,/f/'115. P[C ,WS eaon•MO~ "'BBOJZ!l(ltll, J5 PO\t£R £•Stld[N/, REC NO. MO~J00'5,.'11 Jll SIDfW;(K Ar ~·nurr US(l,/fN1, RE~ NO eB,Oi!1U].'J. NOW H[L5 •N PARK h[ N R/l'f Jg U'lL'fr EASF>l[NI. MC NQ 8;10<ll80.ffi0 40 1/QAQ~'Ar $/..OPE "'S'O€>Mli< £A5[,.£NT, RCO. riO B9(1t1290"<'' <l,.<l"r.i.!f [A<;i"!d['IT. RfC NO ~s·,o•oos ·"'' l?fSrilrC~ONS. COND1n0N5, oa,1c,,o,,s. NO'!:~. <•5£1<0.fS M'O P~O\,S/()l,IS ON Of"" OF R[NCON S~OIH P[M /JO r)9J-~•. R[C NO 891l,.9{l0~ •J f[R .. 5 ANO PRO,,SHJN5 ca,.r,:NW ,'N FIN[ UA/N ''iTER-nr AGl<ff!rlfN; BF'~fN Wt: aot,NC CO""'"y ANa ·H[ c,,.,. OF /?fN'(lN, 1?£C NO 9•0)2J"~~ (U(5 10 NC!"'" OF ,'N'/'RS'[C!iCI,/ r,, ~TH ,~o PAR><") /00£5 ~0' A«fC' S~iJ)!;(' "H~=unr) !•< ~,cc.'H~.U (,llOCR Hi'C, .~(! ~'C'b05Q~~~) H PU..-rH ~"'51:"cN'. H[C "10. 9lDl!JQ60l ·~ "0'11:H !AS,!1,U."lrs. R[C. N'DS. Y4Tl22M,'J .. R4>12J0'06 •1 .. WIJ.N•"!rs, GUl.'OlnONs. Rrsmrcno"!S ·~D/QR [ASfM[~TS JN DO~V"fNT RfCOROW ~IJOC'H .[(" "10 UOJ1a1'n, BLWG • R[-R[CO"QI.Or, w·-~£c .. ~·a ,o,21wa.1~ · · :411. CO"r'ff/Al,/'5, CONDWONS, nsm•CT/04<; ANO/QA PS£A1!:~'' 'II IW1>!/'QRf &-"!DIJ-DPPOS•not, ACR[[l<l~'T, rec. ,·c 20001:,,DC05.l5 : •9 COl't:N/Virs. c.:-».o, noNs, R!Sm,;no1<I AIJ///OR EAS£A<!:N1~. ~,c. NU wwr,, /OOTJ!i< (rnYs PROP[/?fY) (CCLS NOT "''TfCT SL1B.CC f PW.)l'[R'"Y) 50 ir 5' Of.,C!';J('l,/fNT-·AG/?Ef!d/:!<'5 8[T\+£f"I 11,[ B0£.'NG CO .. ~•N< _.NU r~[ ('If r,< ~!"1'00 R[C NOS. 200ZND200G22• ,I: 20GJ'110D0'0J7 . 52 '1:/?415, cil"""AN"l;" CONO.'OCo>/5 •ND .Rnm,,nQ"!S CONCA/llf{) jN 80£WG [A~t5M01(! SANU.'NG ~IIJO'NG SHF P,,N !l,•-o•-DB1-B<;P "fC NO 200<.';]J00085E 5J. CCYrN•Nrs CONO•rDNS, 11rsm,cr<w5 MIO/OR [A$f/>li;~T';. Rt(', ~o. 200••:n~oo,8/I ,. '1:/?"S A~n ~/?°"'S,C'l'/5 OO,.,r,a1,[Q)), ">r-"M:>D(R •CilffUfNr' 9(r>IHN Ii-'[ BO[•><G cou~•NY •ND n,[ c:rv or qn,ro,.,, •re NO .W~6".~2ooc,o,i i!-""'C-':11i;-:; ~!IO~[R_r<J (DO[~_NOT ... n·r st!li.!lC' µRCPERTYi ':JC . ··~ N --- ' ' '°' ro:r i ·cc ~o P~O"[/?rY :Dl!~rw; '""l BF.·P,.(Fr, A~ PAR" G' r~·s e,NO,,,C S,TE ;,[,., Oc"[ ""cu~J~f-(,()/>l~rl!UC111)J>J -C°"{$10C/l-'1'CWS ,-,,,.c, ·11· ~-~ 8f ~wvfc s, ·:><i. ~ot-,,,G.co,,~•~·,-_ '" BOEING REAl Tr COMPANY c1rYO/ RENfON "(3/NQ/t;c 5,•r[ "pt f,N AREAS !CT~ . ~---~Q ;/ ACR[5-t -1 . :;: :; . ~>-~~·_J LGr K ,~r 1£. J'-1!" 08< C"'°C'-'c'_._c.cc_~ 87189 O('<) -:.:::; -;; •. f.C'°c'_'c" _____ + Y~06;J ->~ L/;t I(.' OJ 2'2 l <6 -~-L~~~- :i.:i,o lloQ;,. ,,,., Y0-.h,, Do<t,n. -.,,,h,o,-~~" 9~0.1 oo,i LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN (¥<>;,,,,'-HOO ( ... ilfJ----~~. ,..;..,~ ...... ,,:.;.,,;;,~ 32514 :\o rt!Jc ,11 1'acilic~\"ar:~c~r,a,ir_ (;l?-r'Ti .;.~~~.:. 1h c;c_~e~1·,_c:.:~ --, L ~ .. ... ~O·wi t ; • 2 . ._.. r.-,,,_;--~· ,j ___ tf'!J. :_e. ... t-... e.i\~ t _, ',i~llrc~e-f,t;_(l __ :.:~:rid hn, ~.uid. ·~-:r 'c _p o _i' C.:,;!l.!_y ,~_ li c cor,v~yc .'.-·'.·o r rtc1i iroad ---~--------------· _ ... ---------~----------~--------! .. ,~· -------- . _._ ... ---~--~--. ; .. , . . . .. c·~...-:~.;:r.µ.~:~:-~H,.-~~-,,(~ ,_;::.u~0.,-ml!·a 1,:;~h;·,C1,r ·i-~:.. '·. :.-trncb_ia~.,~~-i-part·oTthis i111fc nt1=-~1'HI ~Ii "'' c•,l<>r,:,t ,cd tl1c SJC4~ ,;dio,e '1<?,cril,c;!. ltla:t ... ~o{b·f;ai<-l Tre r:11l S('~Unlo".'l a1 d R J 1·~, ~) r~i11.ipa ·Z1 y, i h ~-mcct.~~or:; .. ~n c{ ..1..~sign :., ~ccurJ ing-. ... ' . .:: . ~gteemen~::i ted _:. ~~Ot}l~ !.h_~_gr:11 ~t e(\ ~t.1~?~l~~c-~£~l :.~~c.:1 ~~~~r-.i~J-~l_':'±l~l'us~anti rc n1 u.\·c-ttS-~ib ~ !hall ·revert to tht gr.in t"~ . .. _ ---· -----· --- •h.:itL.li~ve the ,"i~h-~~-''1,cm· ;l,c 1;,111 .. u/ _1r,., i;r,lll_t "r ...... :adjoi11 i 11g ;JHI· .--~c .. of _~uctU'1 g, r~a.iot.a.~11._1ng-· a.1nl 6~~~~~~:; __ .s ai<l 't rack _ or tf"a~~s. ·--·~_-~....,.~--- _t~eof,. f.h c l>;rt.:1e:e. .. o"rt_h_e; fi r it ·part. l;aY,IL ,.c.'""'-«:~i ed tlicsc:. p r c·,~nt,, -t he day and . . . ......... . ' . . ·.·::··-~·-.,,· .. . -~-~I / ·--. - .,,,--_. f.~ ,{!_,_ .. '. .. : .: ;:·;· ..... ,[Se:u,J 11 19 4 2 .. ,-1,,..,.a..Kl---'--"--~------~-==..;k~_\..:.i.~--=-·--~-=-=-==e-: .. ~.=-:-...:. =====-= . FOf',.~!•t-i.u ~id~r:q .. _111 l\.!.. ·1\l~,:~·.1 :.·~~fi:vT,:.--1., -~~:-~a--~-~--l: .. ·"":'T'c.,...~·~ '-'": ,·n'11 i r$ hcrtby ~; ~-.·1c-_i~TITi s.f · s... ~-·a iliil ir.d· --- \, ):<lit'' 11 ! \..:~.1:ii.: Jl.J.l>Y ;~y .ll1n1 1,;1r, Y. 1 :~t·:i~-. ~~r ...:1 . .;.cut·.; -.:. . -· ~'. . .','., •· I \, ·<1-lL -~ 11 ::;•, ~ <;.:;:t ( ~J ) '"\.. ,·,_ · n i.at ·tLC.:.. on e_i'-!\;j dr'-:n t t hc-~l..'1:~t)c_U~e l.'('_:-.lc.J ;i..:11~ 1,,.';..i l\.:-:!t',tC!l';l'-.. 1·:·,:~:1\t:,: <· }..,: .,, ' ,,r-.. t..-.: :)·-·.'.'.~1\.',• .··-:~ :·n\•; ~t_l_~x_!!~_-----·---- .. i t '. : 1,1 i .,:·; .i :....:=--- . ' ~-n.o ··~'i:,_.:~:......;i~...:::;:'.'<·"' ( ~ --,~~--_,::... ., . ...,.-_ -~. . . ·_. ___ t61, torrn~:::.~.p :\.-,::i t--:;--·: .. \.: ~· ) ~ ~ : ... ·. ·, ;::.' :· .... ~~ .. -~: .... ,. : ".' \~C l ·\,:.::. t . ().1. __ .:.:: t-1 :.1 ·• ,,.·'- :o i -. . __:___,.:. ( .. ·---.-----• •....... ._. -• ,' •• It' ... '"f .... , -.-·------------.. \ ... +·Fur · a.:mP.r-< paaicubL ~~~ .... ,:.·i1 ··. '. --11 EI. ,. ~·;,q.J,.p1 ,-;,~)I ~--1,·. a ·w'.,....H:k -, l :1(-i._: .~,; lll:i-.-h·-:·,. l~,,:· :i"t : . .:!:t.:J'-+""1..._ ____ _ . ,\'.h id,.i~ h~rc1~)1...!!_l~de -a pa·r cc;r-tiiis i n <kll~\\,1-'.(~ ;111d --h t\: .. ,· ..--.: .. rnt i t 'd 1!11·_:'_t r~p,.---~ ,.h,n:(' (~<: . .:r:·ilird .:-~'J,l,tl)e an~ to :l)on:r,,,;;1pi:l'1Hi,c,._\1 IIIV ,,;,i,t I! .,in:., ( ·. •H'I ''"·,,·. ,, , ,.,,·u····"·-_,;, .. { a ··•:°!'.''· ,,cc , r ,Li,g_ t~ 'he-.Wnd itiu n.2 ~n s::1rd i!-~!'C t 'U ll"ll :__:i:.:th 0 d. . .· . . • _ . . (:'. ~~?vld t <l l~l ;U ,hl:ufd '.ht i:r:i~~:·~'.'.·';·__:,~~i:r:~::,i~c~~!L ,:.:,,!~E --~.l'.'.::~'\l<r.c-a~l<l II ni"'• ,·-1\sr;:d , < .. h .. rr1 ,om, the.._-!..~l~l~ ;".h ::.H ·rri..·crt ~o"'t lit ~r~11H1 )i:~ . ~ · . ·.1h~ ~way.Con_,p~n~\-!:.lii!LL..lt:i.,·l' l l l~ r·i~h.t_ fl ,V~t<'r 1f~11ri ~ ·1:1~~ l:u1,I. ,ii tT a: ~1;t 11 '."r .• ::1 :l j ,1i :,in·;::· :.:1 ld· ._5_~·. _. ·_:J ..... c_7'p~,:p_osc o f con s trucfn~:. 111:li11 t;1i1_1.1P:; ;~1 :d <":1pt!r·.27;;_:.: :::.:.i!J lr:.H.:k ~r · tf:.11;-k s ~tlJ 1illbtrt~(.-~;;-;; ;,;r ~;;es .o·i ·~~ f1r ;t p :t;I ];;,;~~ ~.-,:~•;11 1·,~:I·-; h<·,, ·];;::~.11 ;::-:-lli e~tlay :end . )'eat"'" ,;a. • • ~~j ,·' ;;·.·.' . : .. ...... , ..... /.~,f~,;l.\,j ···""' -.~. ,~ pi oiir/do!l adi°to ..... thta ~-~-j}arcr, thc~t -~h-~f . •,'\ ~--;:-..• :,;.:, .. -~:· • • ,. ' .... _;_ • ·---.• ,::----:..~--:--·· ••·•v •··•• .·, .. ·•, . ._ __ .,.. __ _., :. :¥n! Of ~ ."-gl'Cff9Cci ,be~mn • ~l'J.O :~·~,~~tj ~~,:::Q;f; .. :wi:t.i:.-: ..... , .... :..... .. • ,r:id the :,.,'ort1,ern T>aci fi c..lli.ih,·ar · .., :··; ..... ~-·,-··.·· • .---:-_ -.... l ;:: _,·-·· •·•••. _· t.iu, .. e! t .. e 11. •t :::p t-h~Ve., .... 61 ,A. T·f'.I), .al!-rt-'-l,y-1!, i>ih•:'5'. C~pn ny ;:, >t>f:c ,,,,:.'. :,.nd ~,,-;)/· Ll;e J o.11 ,n~mK ,k,cri. 1'-. _;:.. ..... Jq,~-=-_ , ~11 ,1 :--i i t ~ ,,f . , as p) n g,tQt2,. _._ .. ,.· :~ri~i ,' or stri;, .... ;i lti11t1t.'7:~f,t:!. (2.0 )c~t iii \\i<l,h, hc~n\:t_.oµ. q.o ) .. :.: -: ,.';_:~ -~-.. ~·. l"tte-·ur ~8ttt ~tttt :rt\~~-~~i~d1n~7~::~~~-2~-~·~":'.:~~-~~-~~~ .. ,.~~:..==~--~~;_i 2.·~ro th·e· 1:rt.:ndSc ~ ,_11 t!11..• p:i\t le.s---,if t hL· tl r"st ·)131"1 , ,h·~criht•1l ~1:~oli .. n\~·-... ·<~ ~-=~.~--:r~~~;;,;;~!~~~-t-~i~~j~~-~ ;_~~~~~o;;;;T:==:::: · ·" t .· · ~;,:.~.t~.~{1i~:-1} ~iG~d;;;~;__:_aas t ~ .. '.RP 1 wn~Ct ~-.M.~f 1d.1.~~ ·~~fu.pg~.Q.t;\;':/8J1?t°r.1.P ~?_{ far1<! _~ q_; b ~ ~9.nV !!!80,. ·for .· 1:~ .. U.r 9.',~ ·--./, --... < _·_~h ~;!P-:c ~l .9;~d. ;n: ~oJ,_.id . ;ed c rt-the ~ p _lat "·a-t:tac.bo d :he~t.o. a:rid ··:::: ~:~~.-#-~~~~·~-~-~.10~1<,1 h~,:e_v_f)r , t;-9 1,xl ~q _ri i;; r q aq1! .. a..11 <'L ~o t'}.!!-.~ ;e_e rt ~ii: ___ _ . ~ ;?11Ji'~1J~.~-)l,~):':e:tofo_re l.!ll<l or .. l ,nl·l:i:-::r 7 , 1 '1:55 , ,!:fib';< ~;y .l's c ob 'T . ~:-.~,:_;._,~_-~j·~--, c~~:r,,-DI '.;·"'':'.t.tle'· 101;. 1>1 P,. i-:af~.H ·fr,,.n'5~1ori L l n e • .. · ---. ·--· ... ._'·· ....... . -. ····-: ............... -~·. ·.;. ------.=---~-----... ; __ .... -. '' ,, . ...,..,.....~ ...... ~-~.,.. ----... _~ ·~:.. ....... -----~ ··-,::·;~::';~~1,t,,i;L1;i=~~i~:a1~.i,-11.-~~,,r , ;c~~;,c"e~~~·r,>·t1:;,"a1 ~~~;~1~-~~~~~=-; -i :e,a.rt~<?J:'th1s in<f~ntt~al\i ~h."~·s .c i dore;I red 11,c.;_t r~ .. ~bo,c. &sc r il ,Ed. --. ' .. : · -~~ --• ·.. t atd. pre mi~§.:.-tf11 !J~taid'.lb i:",;,) Com_1~_a,iy, i 1i, s ucce~sor_s .f11 d .assi;~1s. ~ccor,l_ing_ . . i<l ·igfc.c r,re 11t sfattd : ,:.·~~~~t_:;~n:: ceis~ ~ .!!SC~~~i<l ~emi!CS f,,r rJilw~y pu ~(>~~n d r cmov e.-i1 sr:11 Js ·~ttverf ·~~-;tli"'i .t'r n11t Or. . • ,-------- -.-. ·•.: -·l, i .,:\ ..... ">· •• . . • • -'· . ·. ,.•bili:h"-''C th ·righ~. fo~ 1ip 01 1. the l µn th o!. .the g ra11,t ,1 r .... , .... -adjoin ing ~aid- r ---=---=--=---- ··----t· __.... __ . __ .:;-· -'--. -· __:.__. -- , a :-.:ut ar y !1:'-'·, ·· · t 9 .j2;::~uruiili:..C. .,.,-.. , ... I '·· ~ '~' : I (; ). . I · \'. : 1 : to b e-thd!I_di ~i~u .":~-·---,--_ ~i gI1 t il-!~1 ~{'t \ed-t~.f ...... -=-. ,~1r n~iv111:::d: ;,,:,J . "<T f<"C,r_, JC'!""C":i,dy ."[ I ,·:-.e :•·,:y .. ti:, ·:,.-···o:i,>•, . i ··,1:,·ll t }it fur~,i11 i;: i 11 -.t '~~1 ~_!__t'l_!1_, _ _il 11,'._·.~J1·J......'..:.~ _ _..:.lci{r-z-p~.:~~-:~ ....... --~;.:...i -i-f+~~:-:+ ~;~r :-".'~-. -,-~;ti;t ·tr:-T;,r:iT,~-_...__ -: I •: '., ! .. ~-~ l ',1 _-. ... ;:--__ _ .. ~---4"-............ .:. -----~- i i 'l ra t i o n • .. ~ ·--4rrr,c. ~~,W1,ll<J~ici.ihn i ·(h i~-~·---:-, .19 \.. . ......... I ------. ·----~---- ..;__;_ _ -------------·--·-·-- , L . ~---· ~~---· ; _____ ._ -----.--. ,- I I ) . IIUll&H-c.tf:He l&UIU.~,; CA.II!!, ··-Pft ft re PIPI fflJIJT . 1;:::--1 JI. •• It ~1-40 I M V 81 MA •• o ... • u. ue·prtnr ,. .. ,~ on ffle In •• 11s .... Pat;lfto .... ., a,.,..,, J~, ca Otd laUw•>· Co m pa nr. l:mby !'".:SO~ lll!'m, • -.ii.S,.,. ~ ot ~e ~de ot llttelnafter ~td P,rni:;tw, lo eotinrvd. operat, ad 111U1taln the followlq facllltlta apo11 lte rtpt ot wat • b....all 1'8 \Neb 1a U. ~. ft.de of Wuti~, 111 tlle Qi\7 ol ~• U~ergrc,•m d ,;.wtt pipe linN 111 O..~ kit.a l. It ) ml 4 ot Senlou s,· am ao,,'.m- 111ent l..c t:i 1, 2 ar.d 3 and ta VI~ ct e.otioD a, T~p it)~. iiml• S r.n, W.M.> and ill Leite, Waah1"'1on Boor. 1-d11 iu the loo.ti.Gu .non OA tile ~ ~·~ aq dat.@d i'ebl"\UJ")' l!, UflCZ, id.iutied u BdubU ••, r.t~wlbed ~'° ad a.do a part here- o t, rlghte of~ tor tb<> fuil11'1H be1J\g indioa'-b')' JQiD oelor on ~bu •B". !bo, tauporar;, r '&ht• ot ~ 01l'1III oonnruotion ot \he tac1UU. upon t.ho11 portion. o f' tho aboT-eatio-4 S\lbdhiaiou illdioa~ b)' DUDW ooler OA ~it •8". t1f ui!·print vn Rte ID ~ 1. Tli. Permit.we ...UI ,,., • .-tal .t ho?lt,-Iho t..011 aand and ndu,J d olJar1 ( ..Z 5 000.00) ,n advance for Uio twl1 .._ i..r.ot. aln aU tuu and a11~u111e11t. that ma, be j;~ or uauud asa1nst ~ f a cOltl t L 2. Th• m1in cod Mall be beme bJ UM P-lttff, lnelwtla• NI nei llmlt..i la Ute =t of ccm,trwUon, OJ><'r atlon, 111aJnu. """"c a:wl r. .. o ,u otl aa!d fllcillt.eo ; :he cliv~~• nperinlffillnt of tbe &allwa y C -,any ""111 dodcle wh at po nlon it llDJ of t he wor k ,rill t.. clcmo ~ ~ Jt6U,..7 Compeny, aad for aacll portloa 1M Pwnnltlff will pay OIC R•ll•o Compan1 the n ll-\ad r o,t 1,f,fon th• worll Ls done : If the actw c""I u;c,ord1 tbe N l hnate. th, Pem,illce will pa7 t he addllloo ~I a mount "hen called u pon ; If th• ortua l <ott ta lt8! th•" Ille t;thr.a u, \J>e Ra ilway Co nipeny will r• :-.,. th,· ,urplu,. All w<>r 1t htrt lmder by the ?u111 in ... 11\a ll h<! dont in a . .~,• t .,, ·'Ike 1111&1\IICr la tile •lldae\J01> G1 tbe dlvllllon 1uparlllundent ol the R.ilw•y Com pany, a nd in •«o f¢>.nr e .,.,tll pla1111 and ~. Aleatlau •llldl ho 1111&7 P"ocribt or approYf. The dl•i1lon •u pulntencknt of t ht .ltaihray Com• p•n>· •hall h•ve tbe ript .-V ~ WM1I hi bl, Jlldlffl'lli h ~ a.~aurJ or ad•ioabl•, 1 0 r rqulr~ :sny ma1.tr 11I u ,•d '" :\r work tc be N'pla.~ W\llt lixe ,..lffllll or wffil Nwrl&l of a lllON JM'fllll~n t r harar c.r : 1 110 ln ,...,uir• ,,1,4;,;..M, .... ,•: ••r chc n.;ea of i0<a c.wn. oi ~ :..._·,:.!~••.;.. • --~i· v; ..,.:.,;:.,·,Vi .:; .,.p,taran«, o r ,..., •!· .. · .. nt nt add it ion•) t ,.c!u btina-lald , ,·ha n,• of .-racM thereof. c-oa.11.nac.'Jon of a llioUdbur, or t or AD7 otll•r :--:-,:on wh,_ ... r or no1. co nn ci ctN witi1 tht o"ret i"n , nmntena nre or lmproninent of tlk, nllro.d of tl1t K~l:,uy \;o ntp:ny, •Ii of ,,.hk h 1ha ll I~ ~on • at lh• nr,,nw of the P r r- n1 ittH In the maJUIIT M rdn ~&kd. 3. (a) ft. Pflffllt w. asr-that tlla f•<llltleo •ha ll not at any llm• cl,,ma«• •hr :~ilroa d or ,tru,·l•rr, of lhr Ra d wa y Curw ..... L or be • -te tu aafeq of ltt epe,-atton; Hd 14 ln~nlf;-a"d UT< harmJ.,a th• Railwa y C'nm.-.,y f rom a ll 'no• and damase te ita tnaa, ..-..cl, olnarlana, rolll·~ ,t«k .,.. 011ler pro~rty of th., Ra l""ay c -pan)' and prop.rt, of 1hird penon,, an4 ln,a !Qjim.a to or ct.ti, of "'"""'• inch1dlns 1m·,l07tt• of liw .,.r4 i°' hnto, ot•••;n,,.·d b)-thr ~,..,..,,,. "' th< 1><r1ni .. i o11 l,er,,l,7 S"&DtM , · (I,) Tlla Ptl"lllltttt henbt {!U\Mr ••rH, to hold ha nnlua and lnd,rn nify the Ra ilw•r Compan)' f ro m a nd 1,r,ln,·. u~y An d oil loH or damaire t o tk~ fa..tll•let, t!M lnotallatlon ,,f •hk h fl IM-u br l)<r m iltf'd on"" p~mi••• <>f llw kaliwa y f'nmpar y. l . h i• airrnd lbal llio prorialont of Section 3 .,... for t he equal pN!"nlon r;f UJ uthtr ro 1lrnad Nm pa ny or rnm par '" ·-.1 u ·lo forc or heN'dt•r rranted the jofnt uM of t M Rili . ...-•r C o •pen)··, p ruP"'rt )· 11C' ~ hi ,h th~ pn-n 111u u rt,11 .., .. ~id, a.a id f •~ ·1,. I 11·, b tt )1K""a\ed aft a per\.. ~-Thr P r l"llllttae oh.all not tnaoftt' or 1111,rn t hl, 1><m lt ,rlthou t th< v.ri urn r nn,,.,, "' 1h,· n,;J,.,y Compa ny. If tM Punitlff ollaQ a t any U.. etaM l o 111a lntatn and os-ral < th• ,..Id fo <ili1ies .. r ,ha ll f a il tu 1u·rform n •r,· airn·,·· n,.111 n( th io pe rmit, tht Railway Comp&QJ mar f ortnltll urmin,c. th ;. ~nrilt and may forth.,it~ ,:a p.l tht P•rmiti..• f rom :" p, ,·m i, •. ,, •~d at t lle md uf .h e Ptt'Mlt t he P ,nnlttee •ill renor& Ult p,-;,.. ot lM R..ihu y Co111pa n1• t o t h<ir fo,-r 1<.ate. 7. This ;.,e.:-.1 t 1.11 :iub jec1. to o:xi l't..i.llt! :i:n(·erts t.~ 0 £ t.. .• rd ~a.rt.t o!; 1n a .... o t"c (bt o1 vay. In the inent that. tbe u:Ol"OiM 01· \Ju.a 'jA t111it. ..AJP 5 i ra a.ny i;,·o .. •r1..:,, .no l11d .i.n 1; ,,,t not limited to b uil.din,s, pipe l.i."IN 1 1d.re llnee and l'tl aoa. 01 ti..ira p art.1 ea t.bc · •=.i.tt.-o atiall beer ~ c o1:1t or re.!<t.orint; .6U ob proi,ert ; to • c ondition at. least aa t,ood ae t.e o oaditi.on ·at t he tv. or :ru oh ~rmnt and lhall so per1'oni: all .,,o ~ h .. reui.der .,,. to ndniaiN -1y i nterru pt i on oS: ··••• of eaoh ,::'(;;,e rt.y . ., .. •·· .'., .. WltMt ... to aipuuN et hnaitl «: ,,.... A '',: ,,,-' I • //( ., .•. ',,-__, . '. I . . -{" ( . ,,,_,,,,. --- ,.), .... , ij1tn,·pn;11 on ftle in ...... l11ttt:····· .. ··· .... :. day of J "4!1 \'. 19 ~· ••a Ilsa ....... Rallwar O.. ... y, ~YC4.~-· nt VOl429R ll!;f27G .. _ _. Bllftl,W 011 IIJt Ill Yat1t. (eo.u.r..a ma-.. .ua) ,., ' ~,, ,,,. '•I( -,;, ,,, a. 1n .,u 1o0&\1.IIIII ~ ... -. faailiU. UNl-4.J.:...a I.be~,._ lba11 a~ ntb ~ ~ ~·• ape,siAens..aa i.r ..._ GnaeiliP wad• a.u.q 1'racka daW laftllllbff 1, lf!f, a \NDNL-c .t ..eaia, ~ M 1115dJt1' q.e, 1.t ~..._.~ ....... a pllft ll-'• tile.....-of ooe,aw\itn of Nditio-1 t.racke O'ftr the t..US.~I. 1'9111ltt.e 1Mll1 w1.1ih1D a N&.oub1-\iM after MU .. t.hat auc.b a:Sd:l.t.ioD&l aoan:rudiea w1l1 J.·~' -..ad~•• 09ll'l1 ldtb aaid ..,.a1t1a.U.ne u to tM faaili.U.. m>eeite ,__. ~ pl'Opoeed lddi\ioul tnolta. SI. ni. l fllllitw. aball b•u ~ ooat oft A. All con11 and._,_, iMw'red bf \he Rd.bn:1 Compmq in prel.ildau7 1D- nt1t.l gat.ion, e.n;y llll'T91 work pertoraad 81111 aroe.....U.Oa .wd ~t dr~•, plan.t c:d e~ea, prapaftd bJ t.ba kaU-, Coapallf isl coaaection with coutl"UC'1oD,. open• tion, ,sai.:tteMl!Oe or ~al ot b taoil1~1 ii. NlJ cll.an1111, illcl.ud1u& bu.t mt. 1.1.ld.wd t.o &iQ' temporawy ~a &lld pdlltrwnt reat.or&tion, : u Uie Rulwey ·~.pan)''• oollll8Jni0&Uon or 111'm,1 l1nl ..S«. MOWl.17 by tho .x•xieo of ttn, pandt. ~. .:iu.c.u t;s.t.4cr-'119 .... ~.~ -r--·-~ -~ • •··· ,."'" Comrnuur mq dirt.all w obsen, aon- stl'\lot1on cl' toe taoilltic.a. u. ill flag pz,o~1on d.-ed neoeasary b;; tbe Rail-: ::0.,;.:,11111 durill[; o~fi of t.he lac1J.;i ti4'6• 10. Tlt e .n1wa.7 Co,.;~ 1"'""91 the !'.:..ht. \o 11.u and t.o pcai\ at.her i-r1JA• to UH tJ:.i l.and ~n tho aboY..ci.sori~ loo.-t.ion tor &l'l1 8"i &1.1 parpoe~ no t tnconll'is\-" v·,th t.ho 11J<orciee of t.h111 ~t. U. 'l'he te?'!1littcd Bl,'l'tle& that any contract \tloh. 1t shall let !er the ot·n:struct1on o r the !aoilit1e e on said rl"1lt c,f Va;) ah..ll ,tlrOY.46 u .iu~d! A. ·r111, =ntraot.or .haJI ~am:U) aud saT• hair.ae, tiorthcrn PacH1.c ko.Hwq ;;o, ,p'll'\Y 1ro. an;: 11rxl all GlaiJu, 111it11, lo11see, dll:iages or •~-enae11 er, a-lCount or . nju?"'..•cr to or death ot 3111 and .1 1! ;er:io,s v,o;,::SOEJ'ler, --'1 ·;lud1~ thE: :;.,.,ntractor, aub- c ontrsotor$, eoplo,-ea o! the .;ontraotor, a ... lxto:itNO"t.on and o! ea.id :-.ailvq .;oapm)' and &J11 and all proplli"t) da.~at;e, arl.ai•li cu-~rovil'..: out. at or iJl any ll'i&nner conneoted with th6 "WOrk 1 .. rtor.-d under ttu, oo:rt.raoi., or oauffd or occaaionod L,i 1111olt1 or 1n part by r..-on oi ~ i,l'lteenoe .t the r el'Bon or of the prop1t't) of th• •::o!'!tractor, llllb- contraotoro, their ..,.loy.w or i,g"ilta, <.1pon or :·n prorl:11.ty to th~ profert.;, o! a.id ){ailva}' C<JMpany. ii. '!"be ,:,,nt.re,ator fur t :U1r ag!'Ms t.ll:..\. ~t 'o':..ll d.uood, at . ti; 01.1. c,;iq.tillH lD the nar-,e and en bahal.C o .l' sa .ci .1,11:iJw.:.)' ~ all cl.ail:la or 6\1,tE fr r ~aj 1;1'ie11 t.o persons or d,wn ~c• to pro,i;en~ aria;..n& or ~~ v ,..t o! th . wort c11-"'T~,d on under t h ~• oo ntraot, for Kilch aaid Wl~ Co;,,.~ Ml liclll~, or ia allt,~&d \.<; \x, li@J.. c. nie ..;ontrao\or ah&ll oar17 N.,ulAr wntra.ct.or'e r'llbllo L. ab:!.lit, Irurur .. :':Ce , m v-:d1.!'l;; 1c.r 1t l!Mit or mt liH t.ban •. 500.000 i·or all~-ar.'&i~ c• t cf t.be hod.i'.cy i nJUl"iea to or d..th ot one peraon.i, .al a.;b;)Nt. tel that limit .1.·.,r u .:.oh p,,raon, a total 1.illdt c,f ,;1,000.000 for all ;la.~&•• IU"' ... aLi.; out ei! b~· ;Jl,/·U': .. to c,r ;lua~ ot t.wo or lllON Fereone in a!l'Y cM aoc~d._,,t, &J;d .Zo.· a ll&it o: ,wt lac,;1 t..ian .:-.J0.,000 tor all d«ia~·•! ar · sirlc ollt 01' da.u14:e to or de.;tr..c1.io.1 o! t-~v,ic.1.-t,. l n an., unto a.cci.dent, a:id subJeot t o th11 ·. 1w,, a total (or a.;.;rehat..) l...ait .i :.;1,ooc,000 :·or ill dia::&4:N arid.ng out of da-i ar;e to or d1at~ot1on of proi)&r\:Y ctir>.., t..u po.l.107 .,or~d. 1,.:1 1111oh ~lici•• u.1ta ur d-J rse,,·ents taeret.o, a!J&l.l be e:x~_,i.od b; a .;1,r;,or.::t :c.,1 q.:.:.Lf 1ed t..: vr.te t ,.c ~II:',<.: JJ the Jtate ot \:ui,::.n ict.on, shal,l oe a pnind b;, 11&-d ,.ailvii,j' ..:C:_, ai~· e.:i to the ·,.ns~:-a.'1oe oomr •any citinc 111aia 1 t.:.c1 11,.,0 nt !om an ' i;~~'.lt A.;c e t:.,ereot • .he Contracto~ i;i .ail .i,roo....n i£:v1 fLmi.lh to tiaid ,t.i....l~ .:o;.w1)', p · ... or tv 'I.la: untry u_.vn or u11e o f ~a:id tt c:imq Company'• pro,,ert.y by the uo nt.r~~r, t.. • ., ...ruh..ranoe po!.iay, or 1n li-.i tll*'-lf a oertin.d OOP)' ot aucl:l polio;,, t.oget.t.er 1'11.til lln e d~r,ei:-ient Uie~to, under the tel"' ~ of wh .ch the .uu1,.ran"e ~' .p311 y uiuur-a tJw l1abillt;. as~ l:iy \he Con- tra.cl.Or nereunder1 BUbet&nti~ ill t.hv !oni 01 ..>JAo;..al , .. udor11e.'.111nt nt."tac::~ : •• n t.c. and i,;a:ie a ; ,art, .bereo!. I 1 wt429R AIQ276 .... . " ... IJ · , ~·· I/'-"I( .flllt • (o.t1m1t ,._ ...._. ._we) a. z.. ~ :a.~.._ . .._ laW.._ ....... .r...,.. 111e ~ ... IW1 ~ 1dtli u.. aai.r a.a..r'• ·=~,--................. ....,.., 'h'eok• cSaW ~ i. 11w,·. --... -., --. ~ • ...... w, u ........ ..., ...... P-' --,. .. .,. ti --~ ti IIMS.ti.-1 tnake onr tile ,..,U'1• ta.,.. ..... •11, 111.wa • N11aa•k u. .n.-.U.• that auah a1c11.u.o..i eoav\1.U.1dll ).14 v.,_. ... .....i, 1111111 •ait ..-U1..a..ne u-, \lie fN1l1UN tl'Mlll• ...... .-pNpo ... IIIYSts.ul \l'Ma. 9. Ua.e !--1.\~ -.U bMl' \!Mo •n ot1 ._. All con• Uld II' ID • izlGQrred ~ \lie !1111~ Oo-.,.q in pnlild.Ml7 1.o- T03t.t gaUon, ~ IW'Ylf watt pan'GlWd • cm,e.....UOo an111 MllalC!t ~•• pl.au eel c.U...., Pl'IIIU'N '7 ta.a Wlllq Oellpallf' la comeniaa 111th cou\Z'llaUa, o,-.. tion, .1uu.:rt,•UDN1 er~ ot U. tuiU.W.. i.>. AD;> aAalllN1 iDOlwli~ b\l\ ngt J.1ad.W \o a&q ~1'1117 ch.Dp• &nd fm:z N \ reetouUon, :;.11 tti. R.t.il~ i.el:,pc:1¥•1 ~or~ lim Md~ ...... .,,. b7 tho aercue o! W.• pc,d\. \;• ~ ... l.giJ .... ~::,. _. _ . .--"~---;-~ ·"·· "~· , ... v CMp&n7 M1 de\a!.l t, obeerYe oon- et.ruot.ion of t'"9 taoiliUu. D. ill n.g pro~on cl.-.d n..1•i.8!")· by tM bil~ :o:,ip~ during ~a o! the 1'acilit1o. 10. Th e ,;ai.J.VQ CoQpaa, reeenN \ha r~i. to \IH tQd t.o pC'lli\ otber J*rt.i.e• -. ue th~ land l..n \ho abaT~ribllll looct.ltm !Oil' aa, an4 all INJ'l)OHa 110\ inooMi.._ v ~t h t.he IIX.-Ci" of W • ,-na.t •. u. 'l'he k'erlaictea agreH that any oontnct v!'..l oh i\ lhall lat fer t.be c onatractioa o ! the !ao111t1e, on Hid r1~t ot ~ ah&U ~vide u lc.>lkwa A. 'l'he :..C,ntractor ~ Wrr::H) alld PY• ha:n.aes Hortbcni Pad.fie Railway Co;,p 'll\Y .iro .. ~-and all IJlaima, 1111\,, loaNe, ~•• or ex. •DNII on a oco unt ot : nJu~ .. to or d•a\b or an, and all ;sr:w-:ia v ,a:taoner, :.:1 0:ludinc:: th£. ~.:.ntr aot.or. sub- contractors, etiplo,-.. o! ~ ;.;onti-aator, a.1boontrwrton and ot •aid ii.aillfq ~ and any and all prop~ dai::a.•, uia111& or .;ro'IW'.',-< out o.t or 111 a,q 111&nmr conna~ vith ~ ~rk per!oraad u,ider th.ia oo!Rol'&d, or oauNd or oooasi.onod l,1 1aJol11 or .•11 part b y rea.eon of ~ pr .. co-,f tb• r •r110n or o! '\ht ?l"Opert.)' o! the i::ontraator, ~ 00Dtr110tora, their -,,1o, ... or QC'\11\a, u po n or :n pro.dlld.\y to th4'I p ro~;; .o! Nid ksUny Col"lpey. B. Tbe Gnir\raotor fll.r\har IIP'M• t.1:1 ~\. i 1. w:u..l diu:ead, •t. _tu o\ll, ~" .l..n tJut nar,e and on b~ 01· H ,d ,uiillr~ ~ all ol.aaa or w i h fo r .:11,11:ri.ea to perao na or d•~• to J]:'OJ»n) U'ia;.Jli or °""~ ollt o! th-111.>:rtc c «.rr .... ,d. 011 under t n..a oontraot, fo r lid oh •aid Rail.af Co 111paq 18 licl>l.l.• o.-ia alk,ed ~ be l1ablao c. tbt 1;o~rao\or eball OUT1 ~ular ,::O ntraot.or'• t'\lbl.1.o L. ab !.lit~ lnaura!'let i rov!d1~ l"C,r a 111111\ ot "'' llu \hail .;500,000 J.'or a.ll da:~• ar::aint; 0 1:t o f the bodi~ i ~11J"ie• to or d.nb of one paraon., and aub.1ecrt. t.o ~t liaU, f vr oaah p.l"aoa, a total lim.t at \U ,0001000 tor all da111ai:;t1 &1".i.ai.U4; oui o! b~· :..nJ ·ll'l U t.o or de&~ ot ~., or l!ION ptrtolll in ,ny oJV aocld._'lt, and f oi· a liait o~· not lozu1 t;;ian , .;:oo,ooo !or all d~u ar i a1nc C111t or d&n~• to or de;1ti,,i.o1.io .l o! i,.CV,,Cl't~ in ~ onts acc1.deat, and aubjeot t o th1~ llllit, a tot&l (or -.;~ree;ate) L.Jait ..1· ~40001 000 i:or all d6i.~ .. aria~ out o! d s,age to or dNtl'l:.Gt1on ot pro~ dur~:l& t..e polio7 ,.or.lod. A.:l wall polloioa and 11rdoreen'•nts tnerno, auall c• ue.i . .it.~ b;,, a .:c.rj)Or~t l o n q u:.-.L !iod tc . wriw t 1,e 11r.,c :.n the :itat e o! \Jul.~~, el.all be •.-.PJ"Qnd "b;, aa-d l.ailv&;/ .;o~a.r.y a.;i to the ,ruit.ra.'loe OOll!flal'O' m.tiJ:lc •••• t:ui ... o .. nt !ol'l!l an:' i;:.,!;:,t a .ice t:ierao!. The Contractor al iall p roc ... re ¥;"Ill f1.:rniah to said iwl.~ Cu.~an)', ;)r i o r to ·the .ntey u .. <-n or uae o! :,ajd Ra.J.hrq UornpmJ '• p i,o ;,~1 b_y \be Gontraot.or, t..... .u:w~ranoe po~71 or ui U-\her.of a oen1n.d eow o! 1114h polio;.·, tor;eth.-Id.th an e .. dor18r.lent U.ret.o, under t.htl wi,-11 of whiD h tll• i ui.re.n"' co:·,p~ ~una the ll.Wllt.;. ulWl9d b)' ~ Con- tract.or nenumer, eubat.ant~ 1D tne !0111 01· ;.i peoi&l c.udor1.1 e.:1 ent. 1 t.t a c !:ecl ;,,r11,to and r.:ede a J;Ut ilereot. ... ·' ~· ;. ... "-- -·--··----·· -.. -·· -----~--------•, . :; .. . .. .4298 ,.279 . Ji1 comida!'ati.on ot the JlNC• at. llld.oh ibi.s polic7 1a wrl~t.ea, it 1a acreect t.tat, ' · 1. An:r u.ilunoa or prnision appNrin« 1a W. pol107 ra 1n a~ en- dono•nt attached. tmreto, elia1J'.attq =i_;Nftp rcr a..,-oblill!Jllt:1.0D or liabilit..T ••n* ~ tbe 1muzoed undc ~ oaatraot. or •erMamt or tar .iuap or 1njvT to or d..-tnatl.011 or IW'OPffV oocapled or .,.-4 by, or 1n t!M c:ue, 0\18tod, ar·ooat.rol of the iMuNd 1o deleted, bat c,nl7 •• NIJ"ICW tibl.t ccmtnot entered into 'betwen aallhlal OI N4Ufl m, INftY and• dat.d , and th• 1.nl'1ring ~t. are benby atencled to oonr the obl1pt1ao• asaaed b r the contractor under the ta. ot ~ tollOlflng prtn131one at Hid contract, •nie Con~ctor •hall i.DdelSlitJ' us! an ban.l.ee• the JlortJwm P!i.oU'i:: ~~'--:,• ~-v ::. -v • .,,., and all olam, suite, losH,, ~P• or oxperw• oo aooo1S1t or ~~-~ .... ~ Cl' death ot •117 and all persona vhoMoeffr, inchdinr the Conta-actor, aubcontn.c- tor.s, -.,1.oywn of tale Cont.,,,aotor, •ubcontncton and of •&ii.&..... llailwa.r ~. ud an, and all properv duap. aril1Q{ er if'bv· ing out of, or in any aanner cormect;ect vi th the work par!ormd under thu contract, or cau.ed 02' occasioned m wboi. or in part by reuon ot the preHnco ot tho p0%'901'1 or of the '."(l'<>perty o! tho Contn1ctor, eubeontreotors, their o.;,loyees 0%" .gente, upon or in proodJli ty tc tho pr,port7 ot Hid Ra Hva7 CQNPa~ •" "'!tie Co ntractor furth~ &t,'9ea that 1 t will defend, at < t.5 own upensP., in the nar.e and on behal1' of said Rililvay Co,ipany, all clai:,ar, or suite tor foJur1es ta paraona or dJ!nage to property ari11i.'1g -:ir ~O>dng out ot thB vurk ean-1ed on unrter thi s contract, f ar which aaid Roilway COlllp&ny 1a liable, or ia alJ e 11:ed to be liable." 2 • !he Hort.he ru Paci Ne Ra1 lway Compan;r and aQY other nt; lroa d COlllp&ny- ar c Olll)llniea hereto!ore or hereat'wr 11:f'anted the joint use o! the llorthern Paci!ic Railway Coilpany•s ;Jl"Opert)' are aa"9d a ; additional 1nsureda under thia policy , but only as r Pspecta the c o verav.e required b ~· the ab ove c on- t2"act. 3. 'lhe c&nodlat.ion period provided !or under tiu. policy shall be extended to JO days, b u t onI:r as rcepecte the c overage re<fUired by the above corttract. tl tue -pnnr on ffle Jr, V•utt. . roled '°' •-~ ,, c 19 I'~ , .. .,.,,., ilequut d Met ro . lOIUT A. MOU IS, COU!lty Jwae, ---------------------------------- :s: 02',t_· I I I ':J :J ~ ~ ;r ~ ' ' 0 c .. ~ A..""!Ut ~ R£fl ""R.\ TO cm Of It£',. To, cm· n .D.K ·s Offl('E ~00 MIU. A\ "E'\ l E SOl "TH RD,. TOO,; . w ., Q,g~ ~-~ l S'I • • • \ ; 1 . 96 I 2 l 20l5 5. baag re-m:..dad 1c conu:l: CITO( ia Extibct A ----------------i CrNtc,tjsl ,1 _.,, ,...,,.., Gn:. lh...-n fo'<'. r..eoc ooc w:.a!>• 1 1 c,n· OF KE:0-.IOS. a -...icip,I <"'I*..._ . !]_-,"" ___ .-- . . ,, I,..·, I . A w-., .:,{ 1.-.d ~ PML A ,-a,uc ,c Sca.aa &. T :...ll<5hit> 23 N<ir1h. ~ 5 East. ~· M . "' k"'8 ~-"·~ \ 2i-.~1.-..·'"'"~ ,._. uL- i .'-'1 l"r-ep<ny Tu l'an:d /,.\c-"111...i.tn: I ~,.II ~'919 ~9152 f' I g I D Aacnor Tu,..,, ""-.pd ~ - C \ \, I· • :s ... -, .. I I , ! I I i ! L L • • • \ (Mrein.&!t u · ref~rr~ :o 1.1 •f\()elnq"' J, !or aru.3 in et,n~idrrnt ion M:~i..bc-o on l:x.1.ib•t /It. a.t tac.bed. heret.c a_nd by tti is: re:fere:ice ~~TO: pa.rf"OSe of .1 n ~?.cctric· t!'an.s:a.1S•1or.: line anc, incidcnt.&l pur?()S:P S in !Avor o! Che City ot Saat-:le vtiich in1t..n..rnt 11i1.1s recorde~ cm Ckcoober 27, 19H w,de= A.odito~'• ~o. H3'ol8. recorded and.er AuO it.or • Si Tile lie. ,,,2~0 . l. ~t,on b),· ~ St.la ~! llu.l:.i..o<J tc:, or • riqh~ o! access t o It.AU h\gtway aul ~f li'l'b~, -:iev o.nd air, by det;:TN enter~ June 2,, lj6' under c;&.., *'· •~•127. ,. Any enCUIOl>ral\=s or ~feet• th.u ur a t tach afu~ th~ IS>ote of thl< Statutory W&rrMty l)eed t'u"01>9h any person ot.l>cr t.ha,\ -i"9. tJ:C:!:P'TUG Alll> tmlt\lIIIC t.o lloei<>9, i ts IUCU!IIOn , auigtu, i::zvit.cc..s , licc:i~s and pcrslttccs o ~lll.s i.-e per-pet.o.&.l ,ease- • < ' •; \ I • • ·"ie·,·.-... I • • • to e n able ~i1>9 to c.a:e1cise :.t.S rit;ht5 t...ereu.rAe ':"". The C~sc:i ~ •tt.&che::1 hereto and by this refere.ncc i.ncorpor.ot.~ herein. conditions ; l. Tl><! Prop,,ny shA.11 be used to widen the atroc,t · odjacen: to the Property vi~hi...n 20 ya..&.rs <.:r the .1.ate of tbl5 S~ltctory 2. R.ento:i 1i1ill 4SS UM' re..s;,,onsi.bil).ty for wide.ting tbc 1 t.rcet adj •c ent t.o t he Property, i.nc.ll.Ldinq w.i tho\Jt l iai aitio:i a..ny ar.d all i.Ja.prove-cnt~ or .:.pyU.rte.Aonccs re l ato<i t.hc:cc:to. 1'..."'Y s uch ,.,dcning o! th~ street ndj1cent t.O 0,., Pr~rty , iDcludi"'l. '-Hhout lilolt.ot.ion any -1>4 all iapr.,..eae,,u or opp,,rtcnAD<:e$ a9ai,,r c 0.. property ODUtt..l.J>9 tlwo Prc:,pcrty. kJ>tou al>&ll poy al.~ the co•t• and e:rpen••• of .,.,1.ng u,d rdoeat.ing t.o ~·• ut h!oction the property a,,d iapr09-«:>tAI (DOV J.oe.t.i v., the Property] , tllo ducr!ptio,, &Dd •PFoxia&t.a l.oeati.oa of vl>.i cr. are obovn u maber& 3 , 4, 7, I, U and 12 on Z:.llibit D ·&tU:h•.-d !roa Dne oi~ of the ~u.,.t edj..,.,.,t to the l'roperty to ti.. otl>er •id~ o f a.uch i:treet to • a:t..a.nd.a.cd not leas: than Prew.ntly cxiSits and ll.anton will P'Y tll coau aDd _... relati.J>9 t.o eucb prescn.•ti.oA -.nd .. in~. ... I • • I . ~--I • • • \ If tt-.e ?.rope.rty o= &Tl'f p.J.rt tl".c=eo !, by the ,>c tio:-. o = ~i!iiOn to &Ct o! Rent~n, or-its successors or assigns, is not a!:ter the ct.ate-ot this Stet utory Warranty Deed or t~ie c o :i.1.itiol"\~ st•ted in pAragra.ph 2 .e.bOve o.re not .;ocapliW with or i1.re o :.1e=- 1i,1i1c r.o t !ully satisfied And !ulfilled, t.M:n ~in9 $:-iJ.11 h:,vc the right to re-enter the Pr'l;>erty and re-~ic..ate i1ny tsta:e, riqf1l , title o:-inte=-e~t o! ae..nto.,. it...s succes.;orj o :' .,ss1<:1ns., :.n •nd to the Prope.rt.y, without a.ny cost. or further liabi l1.ty on t~8 pa.rt cf Rento n . heteur,~o affixed tMs Hi tnc•.s ,ry Jl,4.nd and ottich,l se•l heret.e affixed the d4y &nd ye•r first above vr itt cn. -J- I • • j • • • \ Tbe -U f-t 171119 -"-lJ of tlle •H~cly pro&act.i011 ot tbe aovt.buly d9ht-of--J 11-af I , tu, StrMt:1 ADO t.i. ... t U fNt l'PJl9 ~ly of t2M VUt.erly pnlductioD at t-. -.llerl7 ~-or--,, UM of a. tt.b litnet of u. rol1-1.o<J daacrUled aa1a U-act• ""11•1"9 at ta. intar--=t!aa of tbe north to. of the • 11, of U. &a 1/4 Of Sec:tioa I, Tllp. 21 I ., antJ. 5 !. , •·•·, 'lfiQ t.ba •~of ti.• 11.lle of Patt""·, u 8!oe !.11 IIMltol: h.n P~. ace to 9ol. 10 of Pl.au, "69• 97, in tcv th s il9 the td • ~. to • pt the. ?15 ft • of the I 11-of • MdiY .. Ui JI plt aad 41.t ?lS rt • f~ 194 I lzl to ti. • pr~ 1 :tt.ea of· tt. ~ u .. ol hllr n., tlt I u., ..s prod .-tc U.., to U. • U.. at U.. I '60 ft of lid aab4i•, th • alAJ "" • u-to the u.y 1llgl:I of t.ba • , u, rt-of-,,. th nr ~ ..t alJ ._ co die • lue of ad wbdi..-, tt1 a -19 ad • a,.. to tba pol.at of ~, 1,,c1..sin9 &ll that portiOI\ of str .. t. right-or--, neat.« llr Ord~ II:). 157 4 lyi.D<J vi tJ:1A the v,o,,,e 4--u..d a&iA tract , E XH I BIT J. p age l of 4 \ • 2 itt .. ri: .. tst rt ' I . • ~- I .• / I • • • Pl.#. o\VD«:f:~ .iQrT-ol'-"1\l AC'QtllSlTIClN Ja:lllG C"()G'J.)IT \ .\ll tt.at pc:ut.ioc o! Tract "A" wt~ W 1/4 Sect.1 o<J 8, ':'wp. lJ Horth, .'unq e S Eu t, W.K. t..yu,g uat.crly of the Martarly ript-of~ lu» of Lau Kaahinqton Ill~. !tlao t!io,c U !'art AW. I. A""-alM> $eOOndary .it.at• !fWy. Mo, l•A) acd ~ly u,dl -u..rly of ~ ~l'J rt9llt-<>f• -, auvin of P.S .I. 9o . l (D-40SJ ~ ._tac! I.IS~ A-line i:-igbt-ot-..y ad -lr IIDd 00rt1-sterly of tba tou-1.ng clucrUied liiw : ~1-J.D9 •t • pou,t oc, Che ..,..u, line a! tha • l/4 o! s.c:t.ioo 8, u i d pol.lit i:,.,1..ng 2~ f-t ... t o r the int.araect.ioo of tho -..tarlr rigbt-of- _,, lu. of LAlta ~ IJ.wd. vith Mid -th 11-of thor W 1/C of Sect.ice 8, 'n>encw noctbuly &l.c:e9 • 11.M ..,id\ ta pan.Uel vitb &Dd 25 ~~ Haterly of, &a -...Sat ~ a119lH to a&id -ly ri'Jbt-<>f-y aargin of t.ke ~ IJ.....S. • · ~ of 170 fNt1 TbenCe IIO.-+~ly in • lt.rai9ht 11m to a point 10 fNt .uterly of, u .......,-ed at: r1¢,t a;~ .. to UM e.utacly ri¢t-ot._y -.C9'ill o! wld ro&d , M i.d po..:it bdJM,l '70 fMt nort.b o: ~ aovtll U-of tlle 1111 1/4 Of S..;::t!oi, 8 I ~D':le <=timl.J..Dll oort.baJ"l J AlDD9 I l iPe 'Cllcb ia r,,&J:&llal 14th aad 10 fHt aarterly of N14 eutarly ri9bt-of-,, -vu, to a ~l.ot 05>PMita ff~ r:nq,._ 'a litcUOII 0+00 ..rt:iDlf the PC of a ~ llll tbe c:ante.r 11-!A-line! --,. of ,.s.1. -.,. 1 (A-40Sl, aid poi.Dt llili.D'I 40 f..-t ... tfflJ t.benhw1 ~r witll all that port1-at Tnet •1• 11'1.at vitbh a 9ttip of land s f .. t wide 1Ji.n9 .Sjac,aa.t tD a,..t parallal with tlle eut.e,-ly ri9ht-of--,, ~u, of i'.S.I. llo. 1 Csa-&05) ~ a po!at oppoatu 111.....,. la~r·~ SUtioa 0+00 ~ a .,_ to tbe ri.¢,it. to a ~J.at c,ppodt4, st.atioa ~5S-. o:-1-. Tract .,.. Tb.ot port.i.Oll <d ~t ~ a-1/4) of 5ect1.oD e, ~ n llorth , ~ 5 i:.a..t, •.•., .i..cr..-N fol.low , ~~ at UII lA'--~1-ot u.. -u. 11.M of ~d ~t quart.er (Ml l/4l "1Ui UII ...--1, aupa Of radr. ~. aao ii:-.. ~ sute Btqi:a.,, IIO. :u., t'-tootll wa•1,· u..t a1-,g Mid ~ 11- 11 1.21 rest, u..i.. a;,nt, O"Jl'Sl. t.at Z:SJ.ll feet to ti. poillt of curr•=• of a ~ to tlle laft of r.U. tsO r_, ~ northerly a l.onq ui.d C'W?e i74.~ tc,et ta tha p>il&t of tazir,eoc:y1 ~ llort.h p •5~· H" w..et to 1111 1nter-.c:tioa Witt! die ~11 r19l>t-of-y E):ri l E.17 -A . ;>ag e 2 o ! 4 . .,, Ith I . • ,I • • • \ aar9ia cf P.S.ll. !ID. l (.a ,05l I U-..::. ~ly ao-4"1•":.uly •; =-~, ui.4 Sl:lr r1.i,t.~f--,. au"9U1 tD -u,t..er--=tlJ>Q oritil tbs -l y "~:i·.- ot--1 aAr9iD of Put ·---•. , The.Aca 91D'i1t.lJIU'~"I ~ U-_ ... I :~!:-=!~ -~• .. n'f ••rt A"Nn\W' W. to .,. !J>urwec:d.-,rid. tloa ~ U-of ti-• v, of ~ i aJld ~ point.or~. l:XBIBIT "A' page 3 o ! 4 1 I I \ btilradZ1ra: I I. l I . • .,..J .. • • • \ PUCn IJ All tut poniaL ot rr.ct. ·a· 1JiD9 -t.1 1terly ot uis ~&rl J ri.,t,,t-(>f~ Uae oL ,.,.1. ao . l lD .OSI ~ ~ ~ 1.- U-ri,tlt-ot--,, ad --,i-11 of Ula -.t ~itbt-ot-wJ Uae of~ ~ &1¥11. s. CJIU': a... a .) UII ..--1, ad ~l y o ! u. toU-U., ~ u., a.,ua1a9 at a piat ~to ~ ~·· ataUcia '4-5'1 .00 -rM ceit v u-l&-U-) ..-,. of , .s:.1 . a,. l (a 4051, -.14 ,oi.at ~ so reet ~1, ttiereir-, t-.:. ~ly pan.Ue.l Witb -14 C>Mtcl.J.M ~ tao • p;,1At "P(>C)dte U.,...,. ~·• Stat.ioa .. M .U ud SO feet ~ly ~ ~ ~lf • tiatanca of ' t .. to • po1at c,sip,att,e ~ ff~.ll aid SS faet wet taly tti..r,t'!na, -14 ttadoa .. M .Jl alM> be.iJa9 tJaa P.T. of • -·tD the laft, ~ _.-, taci,. uoa, • _,.. tD tlae I.aft "'-tav • nd1-. of 627,116 fatt tD a potat ...-tta ~ ...,._ .• luit1-C>+OO , u..UII St.atJ.. a1ao a.ait U. ,.c. ~ -1<1 _... ...S SS feet ___.1, t.bantrm, ~ 1110 a ~ or i..s u feet w"9 1ru, ..,_ tD ..s parallel ritll tM ..-.1, ritbt« '-S' w,pa OIL WU ~ al... (Pan b9 ••• ) naaua, ra-u,a..r ~ 0.00 -,., ....... aboft, ~lJ to the ~ UM oL Qi: t JoK >, -.U ~ 1 . All ti.at pa,rt.1-o« ao.w, iat. l, 2 -4 S 1a ~ ...... U • ., 11119 . S s ., 1 .L qta, _... er . •J' oL i. •-'• Ir, Qt. :N9, ....e.ly oL Lau IINll.1-,toa U"fll . I.&. C&laD ._•Ml .... L) _. wtt ••lJ _. -11 of•·•·•· -1 , llact!I IIMtia ~r a ......... 'C/W, 1eo1_.1,... that pactioa of ...._ IINlld.aftea U..S. • __.. bf Qnl1 •• 25U . £:C H IBit "A" p a9e , o f a tttsi?ttn I . . ·cu • I G ,TO B-= 'Jt:.a-:2.v TO i:D8No co,•,,\'i;:kC.lt.L I AIRP\..ll.NE. (.0. (A'?PP.Ol'-~~ r..c~) • • • \ ,-------4 ~POSED STREET VACATION AND _.,.,-RtCJUr-OF-\VAY A,(QU\1..ITlo-J ecEIN<J C.O -(JTY OF RE.NlON N . BYJ! S.,..., 1 • ' I . • ! • • • \ '::ha t portion of Logan Avenue Horth, North o f 6th Stree located in Section 7, Township 23 North, Range S East, 1,·.tt. State of Wast-.i 'l9ton desc.ribed as follows: Begiruun9 at the Nortn~es t corner of the intersection of ~an Av enue North ar.J 6th Street, thence N. 0° -26'-18" E. a dist~ce of l298 .87', ·thent.:e S. 89• -3]'-42" £. a distance of 5 .00 ', thence N. o•.-26'-10 " £. a distance of 864 .73', thence N. 41° -22'-3!-If . a distance of 25.Jl', the.nee N. 43• -~7'-oi• E. a distance of 50.18', thence S. 41• -22 '-Jl• E. a dis- ~ce -Of 43.92', thence s. o• -26 '-18" 1;. a distance of 883.83', :.hence s. 89°. -33 1 -42• E. a distance of 25.46', thence s. 0 ° -2 6 '-18 " l'i. a distance of 1298.87 ' thence H . 89° -3~'-11".W. a distance of _80.00 1 to the point of beginning. An area of 3. ~~ ~c.::":. c;:-i -4:i, J(i0.58 s.f. \ • l . .le ltr(C :ti?#t l Ott n 1 . I . • • • .. \ ·,-."\_.,a :,. pu~t.!.U:-'l :': 1..J: -· \ .• -:,.~.~-: ·.::'. ~Lr;~._-·, ,r,:, ., l ·.:, J..H':.J"'f\ ~1 . ~,.:t...0:,.:.J:'t :..L..::." ~:, ,.,.,..:" ~L.>. "./.'\ -1·..! <·.,;~; l-V~:'l,JC J.:-'-i·.-::-!'l.:'O;"l . ::..l :..:"°.J.:-:,;:.o . .::.::. !.~C.:..;..::.~...;: i :t :.~.e Lu::.-t~- ..,e ~~ C -..:::.c: o: ~,:c :~v .... t . J .-"'l ~~-i;, 1) ,.,.,:..,_ )~·:· .. ,..::.., ~-: -.:. ..: ~ ... : : ;· CO-"l..~,:-"'.:.:.-:; .... :. ~·:.: .:-.:-t O:::"~~::::io "\ o ! ::".,;,.· : . ..,,~::. : .::11,_· v :· !..l!. .. ~ :.::;.::~-:;;.._,,:_ C'·~i.1:-·.c::-'-'i.t '.1 v ·o..: t.:1· .. t..1,,:::~~-11 .,::r;i.:, ,;:,::_ :..:..::..~ L~:c t:.:~\:.::c;i!.or-. D0o..:.h.;v...1 C"~, :..._l i.L. y ~.:.1.:. c.,1 !.n '".1..:~·:. ... ·c:io:1 :d ~o !.I ~:.:-.:; th~ SoLJt!°';..,c').t co:."'\:..:( o~ t !lZ r:c.,.·.i.1--:,: Co r"".'.>.~:--.y':: :=.::=~ k~=-:-1 .J~ l '.J:-::-,: l V . :..:,c ~-=~ }l::,::r. :;• -~.·: ·-~.:.- .:..:..:~: .:.~=.:-:; c~~ !:..;.~:...::-!:,· 11,...!!(:.1.:"I c~ .:.. :....! !.~·~,. ~ ..::.~--:---.·;:~on O~..:~rvt :-C 1 .16).".) !C"'-"t :..:> ~ po:..r.t J~.(i~ :c:c-t r10:-i~ or ~:".C. ~o!::t~c-~ A!. r i 9 I: :.i..."1.<,:&.t:s t.o tr.c \'t o.J~~i~i::~o'.l !.:oJ:.c ,i 1i:;~w11y ~p.ar~~~: !io.:tl·, ~r.t o:i. ln!:c r cl\.)r:c1~ C ,:ri.tc .c l! r .:! S:.:::.;.:::-... ;.~, o .. :o, :....:iL S:..:.:.:o:-. ~,:::.:.,,:; t:~= :\o~:-:. v~ ~~·.c.:.i;:c o! • "-;,;!"'\·e t o t h e rir,~:: o f c.::-.;.c:-~ 1.:-.! i .:.:.:i 1:1 ~7 2 ~96 ftet; ~~~n ~ COC\~n~in~ Nozth o• -s;·-,.1~ L~s~ ;i\;;:,n fi t~e £..as.t.eily ~t'iifl ot :.~i.d L.~c \Jv ~l'li fHJton . &01..,;le v &cd. 2,s .OB !cct. t.o l!\c point o! l.nt:...:r~c.:tion wit.h ;a curve o! rA.dius 61.1.136 !c..:t. h..lv'i:i 9 J .t..W.>..:.l U::,.-=in9 5outt-i Go· -J o ·-~9 ~ 1:ol~t; t.hcr.ce con~it11.:..ir.9 No rch o• ... ;J'-4 l E.1sc. ~anr, ~.:.1.d I:.l!itc:r ... y m.1r-9in l.OIJ feet; thence: t4,1n9c1H ... to l h c-pt"cccdin9 c our-.:;c HOr-t hC....1~tc;:-!.~ .i l oog ~ C\.I~ t o t..hc r.&.4i"ht h .Jvi ng J r.J1!iu -; ot 1c1.c .; fc-et ,iHH.~ A •Ct"troll l H\')l C o ! .3~· -21·-~1~ .l!'l .·1.:c disti.mC-e o t 197 .6 0 !c (:t t.o t t:c true"" poin t (,! hec;::i:-.i n <;: c.n e :1::-c co:: t inu.i..ns ~o:-tht".:~t~.c :y .:.i:oni; :...J LI.! c.:u :vi..· .:.n ~=c ~~~t~ncc u! ~,.,1 (cet to ~ p~i ~t ~~ ~cvcr~c c~=·.r.)::l,,L{c o! ._ C-1.lrvi..· t o :.he ll·!t or t'~t..:4 1.:-:. 2,1!.2 .J7 !cc::; ~nt:.~i;c f'lo .ct~.e-,~:.1..:r l y .::.lo7'g ::...Jii.i 1,;;.;;v ...-t.J the le ft .a :-. ~re l c::,gth "f l'1~.'1J !c ~: !o .,, p.:ar.t '-! 1n::c.c:;cct io:1. .. ·~:.'.'-: :...."':c S,ou";:"l"'e~tcr!y o.:i .:~in o f ~Ji<.'. t.:,:.::.!'": f...!r.t o :i :r.t~rC.. .. ....iL""\qe Jraa. whcr.c~ t:.e ccnt.c = c( ::...:.Jr.I.! \.".J =v.? bc.lrt: WO!"t h 4 3• -<O'-JS'"' h e:s t; tht"OU "1 0r'th ~!.,• -)l.'-2,• . L.;e!,,,t, .,-10:i.9 the Sou t.,....,.e$tC.cly "'-lrt;;in o! :.,.)1 ...:: i..nt..crcl'...:11\ge 60.CG !ce.t. to.,. po i nt o.n tl-.c-worth·~•i.:..c:1ly ~c-9 i.11 of s.:.id L.:.l;.c 1·1~-..h i."'l9ton l.101..llt:v .:.rd. ..1ncl. t.ht.: !.,;a,.:.~c-4!.t<,.:l y t=..:.:=t;.i.r. o ! t.h.e: !S.i=li..--:;~•• ::: ... ;-thc::r-:. P..lil-.1 .Jy i :i...,~t.-Ot-ll.).;', ~oli~ po~nl ~~Ln~ oo ~ cu:-v~ o ! r~C ~Y ~ 1,0~~-)7 Cc~~ f r o a-:..,!-.ich the center be..lr:: l'LQcth. ()• -)G '-11 .. w~~:.; t...hr nC'::' Sout..bJe:s . ·ly a long .::.iid c\.:..r~r ~n ~4rc l crgt.~ of ll 8-GB fc~t t o : ,o;_nt of pOint of Un9•nc y ; lhcr.c.:, South ~c · -r.J 0 -J2· 1;:-;... ~10-t\g thL· south.t;..;.a.~t,:rly ,w:-C'fin of ~J. ~c! Durling t.:,;--•• ~O t'~t\~:::n Jl..li l \lol)' ki,q h t--VZ:-H:y (]. t 2 f~tt ; tJltncc ~th )(j • -lCt '-2 8• C~.,;<: 1',.tt l.crt t "} ~ point of jnt.c,:uctil)n with th.c ~e$tcrly ....:r·clJin of !;,:).icJ L d -ti "'~"Shi.nc;t.o:r. ooc!.~vazd. ~.)id poifl t hc-L ,,-; 0:1..:.. c~:-v~ of r.:ic.:.i.us )47 .6,4 feet fr~ vhich t.hc o..:n t c c l u !.lC!; ~tr.1•.·r. <'J· -,C..'-}1.'"' ~t.; t.h,en{;..;: lc...Jfinq c,,i.ll U~\i.t..ctly ~r';in ot ~ \1.1.!:ihiO'jt.o., i;.c,1,,;,l1,;VilJ:"'1 -.l.on':( l hc < .. ....Ju~L t.o t ?,c -=urvt:. h.av.i.u9 ~ r&.!~u1,. o{ J .(7.,i lc4::t, ~-...utJ .;.i ,cn t:~l ~n9lc of J ?· -~!·-~1·, ~o~th ~~· -1c·-~~- t:;a:.t. .:.0 .00 !cc~ tQ -:..,-:-t=i..:.J i,oint ot. t.,.<,.....,i nnin<J . Ct.'-~..;~:"l.:.:'"'.si ~~.',r.~ :.;..:.:.re tac t o c 0.274 ~c c<::., Qri:t CC <.J: .!,,_;..:. cx11tt!.1'1' C r.t • l er 2 .I ~- '• r ·1 I I l ..· ~. I I I '. \._________. t I • • N N d' '"4 "J] ~ " 0 r- ~ • • • \ ";t'\~~ ?Q:~io;, v! t..o.;.).n l'.ttn\..t" Eocth, t:ort.r. o: l~h ~t:-~e! l oc.ltcd .i."l 5 :ct ~ 7. 'town:...!ti? ."'! Jo;-t h, f...'ln-;~ S E.!1t, t:.Ji. St.Ate ot tt•:ningto:\ i.!e;.cr.1l .... ;i.::, !ollo-.·~: 8 ~9itinia 9 ~t t.bt l'Y.;)ct.hw~s t c.ocncr or the in~rsec:io~ o! Loga.t1 A veni.-~th And <i th $t~e-t , Lhehcc t-:. o• -2,·-1 1 • C . • d i:;t..a.noe o1 12'1 .S7', .... e;,.ce s . 8 ~· -:11 ·-,2· i:. a clist.aACe or ~.oo·. tne,,~ "· o•.-n•-1r £. 41 d i at.Dn::c o l ,,~.7.J ', t..her.cc H . .Cl • -£2'-Jl• ~1. ~ d i~t..>.ncc a t ,S .Jl', the,,c,, ~-4]• -~7 '-01" (. a dis l:.laoct, o t SO .U ', U....O., S. 4 1• -21 '-Jl" t:. ~ C is -. ~<:<, o t CJ.!l ', ~ S . 0 " -:1 ,•-it• K. _. d i s ~~~c o f HJ .I)', t~ S. 1 9• -3 3'-0" I:. '> <li.~t.incc o! 2S.4 6 ', theno, 5 . ·o• -2G '-18* I~. ~ dl~t..l.t\cc ot 1 2 ?B. ti': t.l>c:nce "· e,• -)4 '-11" 14. " diet~ncc o ! 80 .0 0' to the, polnt ot ~inning . J.n Arca of J .,J =re ~ o .- 149, ;60.S8 J.!. a1na1T c .._ 1 at i \ • . . '. '---... l . ~. i I • • .... ~. ·r I ·, ~ ... ,~i' ••i•li i• II 'S o::u...·. 11 ii I .!" I il -~-----....... --., ----p..: -=" :::, == •-c ..... 0 -! ,::; I ·I 1 1 l • • \ 9G12120S55 ...., -·-·----· ----·--···-··------- i -·, I r ·,: ····---··-·1 ' I ~- ; • _,..:::. ::-·,----·-... '_.. .. _:' _..._ ... __,..,-... ... -.... "" ..•.... ~ ........ _ ... _, __ ,.,._.,.., ... •··----··-. -. -~· ·-=:~4.-:..=:-_:;-..:.~ ~.~~- i.-~ -. -. --·-· .• »-----··--·--·--·~-----,-·-·--·· _., ___ , ______ _ • -------------------------~--------........ -- Return Address Office of th e City Clerk Renton Ci ty H a ll lll~IIIIIIIIIIHI 20020802000224 1055 So ut h Grady Way Rent on, WA 98055 CIT'I' OF RENTON AG 37 .et PAGi Ht OF 019 98/12/2002 09 :37 KlNG COUNT'I', \JA Doc ument Title(s) (or tra nsacti ons conta in ed therein) l Develop ment Agreemen t Refere nce Number(s) of Documents assigned or release d: (on page_ of doc uments(s )) Grantor(s) (Last name first, t11en first name and m1t1al s) 1 The Boemg Company Grantee(s) (Last name firs t, then first name and m11Ial s) l C ity of Re nton Legal description (abb reviated 1 e lot, block, plat or section, towns lup , ra nge) Port io ns of Re nton Fann Plat, Renton Farm Plat No 2, Plat of Sarton sv1 1lc, Renton Boil er Works Sho rt Pla t, Renton Farm Acreage Plat , Cny of Re nton Short Pl at, C H Ads1t's Lake Washington Plat , and Governme nt Lots l , 2 , and 3 -STR 082305 T AXLOT 55 PCL 1 BOEING, STR 082305 T AXLOT l 15 PCL 2 BOEING, STR 082305 T AXLOT 880 PCL 3 BOEING, STR 082305 T AXLOT l 9 PCL 4 BOEING, STR 082 305 TAXLOT 9 PCL 5 BOEING , STR 082305 TAXLOT 37 PCL 6 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 105 PCL 7 BOEING, STR082305 TAXLOT 152 PCL 8 BOEING, STR 072305 TAXLOT I PCL 9 BOEING, STR 072305 TAXLOT 46 PCL 10 BOEING, STR082305 TAXLOT ll PCL 11 BOE ING, STR 082305 T AXLOT 187 PCL 12 BOEING, STR 082305 T AXLOT ?9 PCL 13 BOEING, STR 072305 T AXLOT 100 PCL 14 BOEIN G, STR 0 8230S T AXLOT 204 PCL 15 BOEING ~ Full lcgal 1s on pages 8 through 17 of document Assessor's Propc1iy Tax Parcel/Accou nt Number Port tons of the fo llo wmg #756460-0055-04, #722300-0 l l5-08, #722400-0880-00, #082305-90 19-00, #082305-9209-00 , #082305-9037--08, #722300-0105-00, #082305 -9152 -07, #072305-900 ]-0 l , #072305- 9046-08, #082305 -9011 -08, #082305-9187-06, #082305-9079-07, #072305-9100-0 1, #082305-9204-05 [0300 3-0 IO~ISl3020080 051 J 6no102 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOEING COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RENTON FOR THE BOEING RENTON AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING FACILITY I. PREAMBLE Tlus DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") between THE BOEING COMP ANY ("Boeing"), a Delaware corporation, and the CITY OF RENTON ("City"), a municipal corporation of the State ofWaslungton, 1s entered mto pursuant to the authonty of RCW 36 70B 170 through 210, under which a local government may enter mto a development agreement with an entity havmg ownership or control of real property within its Jurisd1ct10n II. RECITALS A Boerng 1s the owner of certam real property, known as the Boemg Renton Aircraft Manufacturrng Fac1hty ("Renton Plant" or "Plant"), located m the City of Renton, Kmg County, Waslungton, as more particularly descnbed m Attachment 1, which 1s attached hereto and by tlus reference mcorporated herem B The Renton Plant consists of approxunately 279 acres located at the south end of Lake Washrngton m the City of Renton. The majonty of the Plant site 1s located witlun the Industnal-Heavy ("IH") zorung d1stnct and 1s designated Employment Area-Industrial by the City's Comprehensive Plan. An approXlillately 21-acre portion along the site's eastern boundary is zoned IH and is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as Employment Area-Transition (Intenrn) C. The Renton Plant was onginally developed for construction ofmilitary aircraft durmg World War II, with the first Plant buildings completed in 1942 MaJor buildmg construction occurred m the decades of the 1950s and 1960s By 1989, the Renton Plant contamed 69 maJor butldmgs with a total enclosed floor area of approXlillately 6 9 1U1lhon square feet D In the late 1980s, BoeIDg planned an expans10n of the Plant to accommodate proJected production needs for the 1990s and beyond. For that proposal, the City of Renton issued an envtronmental impact statement ("EIS") pursuant to the State Envtronmental Policy Act ("SEPA") that disclosed and analyzed the enVIronmental rmpacts of the add1t10n to the Plant of new buildmgs and mcreased employees DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [03003--0l0l/SB02008-0 051] PAGE I. 6/20/02 = CD = E The EIS describes, among other altematlves, a "Proposed Action" to add four structures (the 4-80 bUJldrng, expans10n of the 4-82 building, a 16,000 square foot add.11:Ion to the eX1st1ng 4-86 bUJldrng, and constructlon of a six-level parkmg garage) and 1,500 employees to support a forecasted production mcrease Based on llllpacts of the Proposed Action, a "M11:Igat1on Document," dated February 20, 1990 and reV!sed March 7, 1990, was issued by the City's EnVlfonmental Review Committee ("ERC") F The EIS establishes that, without the expansion described by the Proposed Action, the Renton Plant generated 28,140 average dally velucle trips and 4,060 pm. peak hour vehicle trips The EIS estlffiates that lffiplementation of the Proposed Action will resultm the addition ofas many as 3,015 velucle tnps per day and 435 p.m peak hour vehicle trips per day. G Boeing and the City agree that additional development of the Renton Plant should be regulated and mitigated m order to proV!de certainty and efficiency with respect to the City's apphcable reV!ew and approval processes Accordmgly, Boeing and the City wish to enter mto a Development Agreement addressmg certam aspects of Phase I and Phase II (as defined below) development and therefore agree as follows III. AGREEMENT 1. Defmit1ons For purposes oftlus Agreement, "Phase I", descnbed by the EIS as the "No Action Alternative," shall include Renton Plant development existmg as of the date that the Mitigation Document was issued "Phase II" shall consist of the Proposed Act10n as analyzed and mitigated by the EIS and the Mitigation Document, respectively, and/or such other plans for development or redevelopment of the Renton Plant site that may from time to time be approved by the City 2. Vesting and Tenn of Agreement The City's land use regulations m effect and applicable to proJect applications as of the recordmg date ohlus Agreement shall govern (a) the continued use and operation of Phase I for arrplane manufacturmg purposes and any other Boemg operation (b) Phase II development applications submitted to the City withm 45 years from the recordmg date of this Agreement, so long as such applications are for airplane manufacturmg uses NoJwithstandmg the foregomg, the City reserves the authonty under RCW 36 70B 170( 4) to impose new or different regulations to the extent reqmred by a senous threat to public health and safety, as determmed by the Renton City Counc!l after notice and an opportumty to be heard has been provided to Boemg DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [OJOOJ.0105/S8020080 Ol 1) PAGE2 6120/02 3 Land Use Regulations For purposes oftlus Agreement, "land use regulations" means Comprehensive Plan policies and zoning standards m effect as of the date of tlus Agreement, provided, however, that Boemg may elect at its discretion that Comprehensive Plan pohc1es and zomng standards adopted after the recordmg date of this Agreement shall apply to all or part of Phase II development For purposes of tlus Agreement, the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the Renton Plant site is Employment Area -Industrial and the zoning des1gnat10n apphcable to the Renton Plant site is IH pursuant to the March 15, 2002 Zorung Map as adopted by the City Council 4 Baseline Vehicle Tnps 4 1 Calculation of Future Traffic Impacts and Mittgatlon Existmg vehicle tnps associated with Phase I, described by the EIS as the "No Action Altematlve," (i.e, 28,140 average daily trips and 4,060 pm peak hour tops) shall be considered to be vested and to form the "baselme trips" for purposes of the analysis of transportation impacts associated with Phase II development or redevelopment of all or a component of the Renton Plant site For example, and without limiting the foregomg, if Boemg elects to dispose of or redevelop all or a component of the Renton Plant site, all or a portion of the baselrne trips may be assigned to that component of the site when calculatmg and detemumng the appropnate initlgatton of future transportation 1IDpacts applicable to that component's redevelopment. Therefore, only those traffic tmpacts that exceed the tmpacts associated with the "baselme tnps" shall be subject to transportatton !Dlttgatton 4.2 Traffic Modeling "Baselrne trips" as descnbed in Paragraph 4 1 above (i e, 28,140 average daily tnps and 4,060 p.m peak hour trips) shall be mcluded m the City's traffic model for purposes of estimating fumre transportation tmpacts 5. Other Mitigation Fees With respect to impacts to public servtces other than transportation, future butldmg demolitions at the Renton Plant site shall be elig1ble for "redevelopment credits," whtch shall offset any applicable rruttgation or llllpact fees (includmg, but not )muted to, filltigation fees for fire and water sefY!ces) that would otherwise be assessed by the City on the basis of square footage of new floor area for each square foot of floor area demolished. 6 M1ngatlon Document To the extent that tlus Agreement conflicts with the Mitigation Document, this Agreement controls. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [03003-0 l05/SB020080 051] PAGE3 6/20/02 = = = 7 Recordmg. Tins Agreement, upon execut10n by the parties and approval of the Agreement by resolutton of the City Council, shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Divis10n of the Kmg County Records and Electtons Department 8 Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall bmd and mure to the benefit of Boeing and the City of Renton and their successors m mterest, and may be assigned to successors m mterest to all or a portion of the Renton Plant property Upon assigrunent and assumption by the ass1gnee(s) of all obhgattons under this Agreement, Boeing shall be released from all obhgattons under this Agreement. 9 Counterparts This Agreement may be executed m counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an ongmal 10. Exprratton. This Agreement, unless rescmded by Boemg or its successors m mterest, shall become null and void 45 ( 45) years from the date of recording of this Agreement #1 AGREED this _JJ_'_ day of __ _..,,9r.,,,...._,"",n""""".1./"'-------'' 2002 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [03003-0 l05/SB020080 051] PAGE4 6/20/02 = ex:,. = CTTY ~ REN10N ~·d~c?~ ATTEST: By: Bonnie I. Walton --"'-==~'---"-="'-"---- Its _---1.CCLJ_r;ty)I.-LC..1.)f!:eri:.tk'--------~ A~ed as to form· o<-~WU~ City Attorney • On tlus __ day of June , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public m and for the State ofWashmgton, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jesse Tanner to me known to be the person who signed as of the CITY OF RENTON, the corporation that executed the witlun and foregomg mstrument, and acknowledged said mstrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporat10n for the uses and purposes therem ment10ned, and on oath stated that he was duly elected, quahfied and actmg as said officer of the corporation, that _lte __ was authonzed to execute siud instrument and that the seal affixed, 1f any, 1s the corporate seal of said corporab.on IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above wntten DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [OJ003-0105/SB020080 051) ~0,~A? (Signature of Notary) Su ?Atrv\ b. ~e,dj_ (Prmt or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC m and for the State ofWashmgton, residing at SP!ftd~ My appomtlnent exprres· -----'9"-l-~q/_J~1uL-- PAGE 5 6t20f02 THE BOEING COMPANY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [1SB020080051 DOC] By Ph1hp W Cyburt Its Vice President PAGE6 617102 -...... ""' c:> c-:, c::> CV = 00 = <" ·= ·= """ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~ I• I I I Slate of Calitorn1a County of WX, AN GE-LC'::, beforeme l>AW>.l h 51-lA\ll>R. NoTP./'....1 Pueuv ' ' _, personally appeared PH ILW W CY e,ut'-T @ DAWNE SHAVER COMM # 1325796 NOTARY PUii.JC • CAIJFORNtA LOS ANGELES COUNlY Comm Exp OCT 18 200S Name and T,\lij u1 OHire' (e g. Jane Ooe, Notary P<,ibll~ ) • N,me{~I 01 Sqter<;s) l:!1 personally known lo me 0 proved to me on the basts of satisfactory evidence to be the person\&) whose name(st 1slffle subscribed to the w1thm mstrument and acknowledged to me lhat he/&lle/llrey executed the same ,n h1s/Reflthmr authorized capac,ly{ies), and thal by h,s!~r s1gnatu~(el' on the instrument the person{el, or the entity upon behalf ol which the person\s) acted, executed the instrument ITNESS my hand and ott,c,al seal C Sha t,cV,,. ----~---------------oPnONAL~------------------~ Though the mformat,on below 1s not reqwred by law, rt may prove valuable lo persons relying on the document and could prevenl lraudule11t removal and reattachmenr of this form to another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document ------------------------- Document Date ~---------------~Number of Pages------ S1gner(s) Other Than Named Above --------------------- Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name lJ Individual 0 Corporale Officer -T1tle(s) ----------------- rl Partner -0 L,rn,ted O General O Attomey-1n-Fact 0 Trustee O Guardian or Conservator 0 Other l!,I 1999 Nallc,na: Nolary ~a1ton • 935-0 De SOio Avo PO Box 2402 • Ch:il!SWorth CA ~1313 2~02 • www na~,:,nllll'IQtary erg ~oo,,w Call Toll Fr~ 1800137ll €,132'/ c:> co = -------------------~~=--~,...,..,.,,.-.--"_,...,.. -----'="'--•- ATTACHMENT I legal Description of Boeing Renton Plant Property PARCEL I LOTS I THROUGH 13 IN BLOCK 11 OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECOROED IN VOLUME 10 Of PLATS, PAGE 97, RECOROS OF KING COUNTY, EXCEPT THAT PCRTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON SY OEtDS RECORDED l/NOBI. RECORDING NOS 7203140338 AND 9406070578, TOGETHER WITH LOTS I THROl/GH 8 IN BLOCK I OF SARTORISVILLE, AS PER PlAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 7, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, EXCEPT THAT PCRTION OF SAIO LOT 1 CONVEYED TO THE C[TY OF RENTON BY OHO RECORDED UNOER RECORO!NG NO 7203140338, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNl;R OF SAID LOT, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13 50 FEET, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS 13 $0 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21 20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY UNE Of SAIO LOT, lJ 50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13 SO FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAIO LOT l ANO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, DESCRIBEO AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of SAID LOT, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE Of 13 SO fEET, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A Cl/RVE TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS 13 50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21 20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTatl.Y LINE Of SAIO LOT, lJ SO FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13 50 FEET TO THE NORWcASl' COI\Nl:R Of SAID LOT 1 ANO TflE POINT OF 81:GlNNING, ANO TOGETHER WITH me WEST 83 S FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12 IN &LOCK 1 OF SAIO PLAT OF SARTORISVILLE, EXCEPT TflE NORTH 20 FEET Of SAID LOTS 11 AND 12, AND TOGETHER WITH LOTS I ANO 2 Of RENTON BOILER WORKS SHORT PLAT NO 282-79, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 7907109002; SITUAHD IN THI; CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PAGE g -----------------------·-- = = c:, PARCEL 2 LOTS J, 4 ANO S !N 6LOCK 4 OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED !N VOLUME 12, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 3 THE WEST 17 S FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET Of LOT 10, THE WEST 17 5 FEET OF LOTS 11, 12, ANO 13, ALL Of LOTS 14, IS, ANO 16, ANO THE NORTH JO FEET OF LOT 17, ALL IN 8LOCK 10 OF REHTOII FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION Of THE VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE CIT'/ OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 7307090450, SITUATED IN THE C!TY OF RENTON, COUNT'/ OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 4 THAT PORTION Of THE NORTHWEST l/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM , OESCRUlEO AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK 10 OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, THENCE NOii.TH, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF PARK AVENUE PRODUCED, 185 FEET, ..... ·= , = THENCE WEST 107 5 FEET, ...... THENCE SOUTH 185 FEET, THENCE EAST 107 S FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR. THE WIDENING OF 6"' AVENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNOER RECORDING NO 7206090448; ANO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY 8Y DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9406070574, SITUATED lN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 5 PARCEL 8 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 093·89, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 8911149006, SITUATED IN THE C!TY OF RENTON, COUNT'/ OF KING, STAT!; OF WASHINGTON PAGE 9 PARCEL 6 H1AT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE NOIITH LINE Of NORTH 6'" STREET AND BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTERLINES OF PELLY AVENUE NORTH ANO MAIN STREET, NOW WELLS STREET NORTH, EXCE9T THAT roRTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE cm OF 11.ENTON 6Y OEEOS RECORDED UIIOER RECORDING NOS 7108190352 AND 8509130916, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 7 PARCEL A Of CITY Of RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 093-89, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 8911149006, TOGETHER WITH LOTS I THROUGH 5 IN BLOCK 3 AND LOTS I ANO 2 IN BLOCK 4 OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND TOGET>tER Wint THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND ALLEY ADJOINING, AS VACATED UNDER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NOS 3319, 3327 AND 4048 WHICH, UPON 1/ACATION, ATIACHES TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF I.AW, AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NOIITHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST l/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2) NORTH, IIANGE 5 EAST, WM, WHICH llES BETWEEN THE WEST LINE OF SAIO VACATED ALLEY ON THE EAST AND THE EAST LIE:N OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 2·A (PARK AVENUE EXTENSION) ON THE WEST; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEIIEOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON 8Y DEEDS IIECOROEO UNDER RECORDING NOS 5180889 AND 9406070579; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCELS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST l/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NOIITH, RANGE S EAST, WM, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTEIISECTION OF THE NOIITH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE WEST LINE Of PAAK AVENUE, AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT Of RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER Pl.AT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECOIIOS Of KING COUNTY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PIIOOUCTION, TO A POINT 715 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE WEST PAAALLEL WITH ANO DISTANT 715 FEET NORTH FROM SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION Of THE CENTEII LINE OF PELLY STREET, THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PIIODUCED CENTEIIL!NE, TO THE NORTH OF SOUTH 660 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION, PAGE10 = = = THENCI; WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PROOUCTION OF THI; CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, NOW WELLS AVENUE NORTH, AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT OF RENTON FARM PlAT NO. 2, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 32, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PRODUCTION TO THE NORHI LINE OF NORTH 6'" STREET, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6°' STREET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT·OF·WAY TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT TiiAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE cm OF RENTON FOR rne WIDENING OF NORTH 6"' STREET BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECOROING NOS. 7106110508, 7106110510, 7106110511, 8509100968, 8509130916 AND 8509130917; SITUATE IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 9-A THAT PORTION Of THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, WM, LYING SOUTHERLY OF NORTH 6'" STREET, WESTERLY OF LOGAN STREET NORTH EXTENSION (LOGAN AVENUE NORTH) AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 3261297, EASTERLY OF CEDAR Rll/ER WATERWAY (COMMERCIAL WATERWAY NO 2), AND NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT Of LAND CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 5701684, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY 5Y DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 5907048 (ALSO BEING TilAT TRACT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 10 FOLLOWING), SITUATE IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE Of WASHINGTON PARCEL 9-8 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 IN THE EAST 'h Of SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST WM, ANO OF CH ADSirS LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED lN VOLUME 8 Of PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, ANO CERTAIN VACATED STREETS, AVENUES AND ALLEYS IN SAID PLAT, AND CERTAIN SHORE LANDS AND VACATED l.(IGNI STREET NORTH (FORMERLY WILLIAMS STREET NORTH), IN SAID SHORE LANDS, ALL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH ANO THE WEST LINE OF LOGAN STREET NORTH, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO THE EAST-WEST CENTERUNE IN SAID SECTION 7, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH, AS THE SAME IS CONVEYED NORTH OF SAID SECTION LINE, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID WEST LINE, PAGE 11 ------------------------------=-=_,...,.,_.~,...,....,._-_,, ' = = = THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO AN lfiTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 30 fEeT NORTHWESTERLY OF THE GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE IN SAlO GOVERNMENT LOT 1, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID VACATED LOGAN STREET NORTH, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTHWESTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID VACATED STREET TO THE INNER HAR80R LINE OF IJIKE WASHINGTON, T!IENCE 50\ITHWESTERLY ALONG SAID INNER HAR80R LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE Of THE RIGHT· OF·WAY OF COMMERClAL WATERWAY NO 2, THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WATERWAY RIGHT·OF·WAY, TO rrs INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF StGINNING, TOGETHER wrfH BLOCK C OF THE 3'0 SUPPLEMENT OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE Of WASHINGTON PARCEL 9·C AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LANO LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7 ANO IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, AU IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST WM , INCLUDING WITHIN THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON SHEETS NOS 3 AND 4 OF MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE ANO FILED IN CAUSE NO 156371 IN TttE SUPERIOR COURT Of KING COUNTY ENTffi.EO SEATTLE FACTORY SITES COMPANY, ET AL VS ANNIE J ADAMS, ET AL, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT l, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGES EAST W.M., THENCE NORTH 88°Sl'OS" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SA!D LOT 1, ANO Al.ONG SUCH LINE PROOUCEO WESTERLY 960 01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT·OF·WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°51'05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 PRODUCED WESTERLY, 761 39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SA!O MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THE NOl\lt1ERLY LINE OF THE SHUfFU:TON STEAM PLANT l'ROl'ERTY, THENCE NORTH 43'06'56" WEST, ALONG SAIO NORTHERLY PROPERTY UNE OF SAIO SHUFFLETON PROPERTY, 680 06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH Tl-IE INNER HARBOR LINE Of LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS LAID OUT BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 46'52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 858 51 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 726 94 FEeT TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE VACATED COUNTY ROAD NO 376, ALSO KNOWN AS RAILROAD AV!'NUE, WILLIAMS STREET ANO LOGAN STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, SAID ROAD BEING EXTENDED NORTHERLY, PAGE 12 -·--· THENCE SOUTH !4'J6'26" EAST, AlONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SA/0 EXTENDED COUNTY ROAD 817 01 FEET TD AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD, THENCE SOUTH 41'22'31" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 514 19 FEET TO A POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE BOEING COMPANY PROPERTY KNOWN AS PARCEL V, THENCE SOUTH 66°24'16" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL V 217 51 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE R!GHT-OF·WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID INTERSECTION BEING POINT ON A CURVE OF RADIUS 1482 71 FEET FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH 62°36'53" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF-WAY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF 316 79 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER Of THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH S0'24'23" EAST, THENCE NORTH 14°34'18" WEST 1,546 44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATE IN THE CITY Of RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 9·0 AN IRREGULAR TRACI OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of SECTION 7 ANO IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, All IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, IIANGE 5 EAST, WM., INCLUDING WfTH!N THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE I.ANOS, AS SHOWN ON SHEET NOS 3 AND 4 OF MAP PREPARED 6Y UDO HESSE ANO FILED IN CAUSE NO 156371 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY ENTITLED SEATTLE FACTORY sms COMPANY, ET AL vs ANNIE l ADAMS, ET Al ANO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS· BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT I, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, IIANGE 5 EAST W M , THENCE NORTH ss•s1·os· wesT ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 1, ANO ALONG SUCH UNE PRODUCED WESTERLY, 960 01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-Of·WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, THENCE CONTINUING NORTfi es•s1·os· WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 PRODUCED WESTERLY 761.39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SAID MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THI;' NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SHUfflETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 43'06'56" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPER'TY LINE OF SAID SHUFFLETON PROPERTY, 660 06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE INNER HARBOR LINE Of I.AKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS lA!D OUT BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 46•52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR UNE 607 89 FEET TO THE TRUE PO!tff OF 6EGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 46'52',7" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 250 62 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 14'34'18" EAST 1,546 44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT -Of-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PAC!f!C RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID INTERSECTION BEING POINT ON A CURI/E OF RADIUS 1,482 71 FEET FROM WHICH THE CENTER Of THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH 50'24'23" EAST, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SA!O RIGHT·Of·WAY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH Of 132 81 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE OF RADIUS 2,052 27 FEET FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLES BEAR SOUTH 45' 16'28" EAST, PAGE 13 ·--------------------.... .....,·""""'------------~..;_-,~ = = = THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH Of 214 91 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 50°43'32" EAST ALONG SAlO RiGhT-Of·WAY MARGIN 159 90 FEET, THENCE NORTH 20'38'24' WEST 700 81 FEET, THENCE NORTH 46'53'04' EAST 215.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 43°06'56" WEST 713 87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 10 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, AANGE 5 EAST, WM , LYING EASTERLY Of COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO, 2 (CEDAR RIVER WATERWAY), ANO WESTERLY OF LOGAN STREET NORTH EXTENSION (LOGAN AVENUE NORTH) AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3261297, DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6™ A.VENUE NORTH AND THE WEST MARGIN OF LOGAN STREET NORTH, THENCE NORTH 89°34'11' WEST ALONG SAlO SOUTH MARGIN, 674 91 FEET, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY CORNER OF A TRACT CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 5701683, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°34'1 l" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 441 54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY R!GHT-OF•WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO 2, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO 211409, THENCE SOUTH 12"47'42' EAST, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 328 72 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND no FEET SOUTH Of, 11.S MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTH MARGIN Of 6"' AVENUE NORTH, THENCE SOUTH 89"34'11 • EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 366 34 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°2S'49" EAST 320 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE Of WASHINGTON PARCEL 11 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. 6EGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF PARK STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 2A, THENCE SOUTH 89°28'19" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 771 21 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°31'51" EAST 253 23 FEET TO THE TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE Of A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 850 FEET, PAGE14 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 274 82 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 17°59'39" WEST 1484 81 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY NAi>.GIN OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARO, ' THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIO CURVE TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 49°16'19" EAST 288 67 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 250 57 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY, SAJO PO!ITT OF TANGENCY BEING ON THE EASTERlY MARGIN OF SAID PARK STREET, THENCE SOUTH 00°57'41" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1581 JO FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. I (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO 656127, ANO EXCEPT THAT PORTION(S) THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR PARK AVENUE NORTH BY OEEO RECOROEO UNDER RECORDING NO 970318142Z, 6EING A RE·RECORDING Of 96121208S5 ANO RECORDING NO 8811150482, TOGETHER Wint THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, ADJOINING, WHICH. UPON 1/ACI\TION, ATIACHEO TO SAID PROl'!'RTY IIY OPERATION OF LAW, _,.. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON . ..., ..... C, c, = c-, = a:, c:, PARCEL 12 AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LANO LVING IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, INCLUDING WITHIN THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS SHOWN ON SHEETS NOS 3 ANO 4 OF MAP PREPARED SY UOO HESSE ANO FILED IN CAUSE NO 156371 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY ENTITLED SEATILE FACTORY SITES COMPANY, ET Al VS ANNIE J AOAMS, ET Al, ANO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE NORTH 88°51'05. WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAIO LOT 1, ANO ALONG SUCH LINE PRODUCED WESTERLY 960 01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT•OF·WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°51'05• WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAlD LOT I PROOUCEO WESTERLY 761 39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SAID MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 43°06'56" WEST, ALONG SAlO NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAIO SHUFFLETON PRQPERTY, 680 06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE INNER HARBOR l!NE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS LAID OUT IIY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAIO INNER HARBOR LINE 607.89 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 713 87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 220 00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 46°53'04" WEST 220 00 FEET, PAGE 15 ----------------------------------· ·- THENCE SOUTH 31"37'23" EAST 448 22 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE R!GHT·OF·WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, THENCE ALONG SAIO MARGIN SOUTH 50•43'32" WEST 174 00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 20°38'24" WEST 700 61 FEET, THENCE NOIITH 46°53'04" EAST 215 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THOSE POSITIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY BY OEED RECORDED UNOER RECOIIOING NO 8812140277 AND FURTHER OEUNfATEO AS PAIIC!:LS C ANO O ON cm OF RENTON LOT UNI; ADJUSTMENT NO 004·88, RECOROEO UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808309006, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION KNOWN AS PARCl:L E Df CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO 004·88 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 8808309005, DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE REFERENCED TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 4 3'06'56" EAST 3 86 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 14•35•25• EAST 244 87 FEET TD THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 14°36'26" EAST 345 29 FEET, THENCE NORTH 31°37'32" WEST 309 63 FEET, THENCE NORTH 46'53'04" EAST 103 03 FEET TO THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL IJ THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE ABANDONEO euRUNGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON BELT LINE) RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LYING WESTERLY OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASHINGTON 80UlEVARO S E ); TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SAID SECTION, DESCRIBED AS BeGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON 6El.T LINE) RAILROAD RIGHT·OF·WAY ANO THE WeSTERLY MARGIN OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARDS E ), THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIO SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN 60 FEET TO THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO 10 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PAAK AVENUE (lAl<E WASHINGTON BOULEVARDS E ), THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAIO GOVERNMENT LOT, THENCE WESTERLY TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RA!LROAO MARGIN, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, PAGE 1 6 = = = EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONOEMNED FOR SR 405 BY KING COUNTY SUPER!DR COURT CAUSE NO 656127; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVErEO TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR WIDENING Of PARK AVENUE NORTH SY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 9703181422, SITUATED IN THI: CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 14 THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON ·NORTHERN !NC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO.) 100 FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-Of-WAY IN SECTIONS 7 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4™ STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6"' STREET, SITUATED IN THE CITY Of RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 15 THAT PORTION Of THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN INCS 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ITS BELT UNE IN GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND NORTHWEST V. OF THE SOUTHWEST V. OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M., ANO GOVERNMENT LOTS I ANO 2 IN SECTION 7, SAIO TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, BETWEEN A WEST PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 6™ AVENUE NORTH AND A LINE EXTENDING SOUTHEASTERLY AND RAOIAUY TO THE MAIN TRAO< CENTER LINE AS NOW CONSTRUCTED FROM SURVEY STATION 1068+00 IN SAID CENTER UNE (DISTANT 40 8 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY END OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC'S BRIDGE NO 3) ANO SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOUOWING DESCRIBED LINE BEGINNING AT A POINT 25 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED RADIALLY ANO AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF TRACK AS NOW CONSTRUCTED, FROM SURVEY STATION 1068+00; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLV IN A STRA!GKT LINE TO A POINT 25 FEET NORIBWESTERLY, MEASURED FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AT SURVEY STATION 1074+00, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY AT AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT ·OF-WAY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF SPUR TRACK HEADBLOCK STATION 8+85 5 THE END OF DESCRIBED LINE AND ENO OF DESCRIPTION, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PAGE 1 7 -.2" """ .,... = Q = 2 c-.. c::, = = "" ·= ·= "" ATTACHMENT2 Development Regulations Applicable to Phase II Development Development regulations, including, but not !muted to the followmg chapters of Title IV of the Renton Mumc1pal Code • Chapter I • Chapter 2 • Chapter 3 • Chapter 4 • Chapter6 Pohc1es set forth m the City ofRenton's Comprehensive Plan (adopted February 20, 1995, amended August 13, 2001). PAGt: 18 Ret11rn Address Office ofthr City Clerk Renton City Ha II 1055 South Grady Wa> Renton. WA '18055 Document Ti1lt(s) (or transactions contain((! therem) I l)cvdopment Agreement for Renton Plant Redevelopment Ref,reatt Number(s) oJJ>ocumeats assigned or ttleased: {oo pago _ of documents(s)) Granlor(s) (Lnst name first, then first name and m1hals) 1 The Iloc1ng Company GraalH(s) (L1st name first, then first name arul initials) 1 City of R,nton Legal descrlplioo (abbrev,ated I e lot, block, plat or section, township, range) ·- Portions or Renton Funn Plat, Renton Fann Plat No 2, Plat of Sartonsvillc, Rfflton Boiler Work, Short Plat, Rtnton Fann Acreage Plat, City of Renton Short Phu, CH Adsit's Lake Washington Plat, and Government Lots I, 2, and 3 -STR 082305 TAX LOT 55 PCL I BOEING, STR 082305 TAXWT 115 PCL 2 BOEING, STR 08230S T AXLOT 880 PCL 3 BOEING, STR 082305 T AXWT 19 PCL 4 BOEING, STR 082305 TAX LOT 9 PCI. 5 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT .'17 PCL 6 BOEINO, STR 082305 TAXLCYJ' 105 PCL ~ BOEING. STR 082305 TAXLOT 152 PCL 8 BOl:INO, STR072305TAXLOT I PCL 9 BOEING, STR 072305 TAXLOT 46 PCl 10 BOEING, snt 082..'05 TAXI.OT 11 PCL 11 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 187 PC!. 12 BOErNG, STR082305 'J'AXLOf 79 PCL 13 BOEING, STI< 072305 lAXLOT 100 PCL 14 BOEING, STR 08230S TAXLOT204 PCL 15 BOEING @ Full legal 1s on pages __ through-·-· of document Assa.or'• Properly Tax P•rcfl/A«ount Number P<>r11on, oft~ rollowmg· ff756460.00S5-04, ~722300-0115-0&, #n2400-0880.()0, #082305-9019-00. #082305-9109-00, #082305-9037-08, #722300-0105-00, #082305-9152-07, #072305-9001-01, 11()72305- 9046-08, #082J05-9011-08, #082305-9187-06. #082~05-9079-07, #072305-9100.01, #082305-9204-05 (/B0£1NG ~ "Sf'tmlfll 11 24 Ol dt'X:] ll/2A/03 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOEING COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RENTON FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF THE BOEING RENTON AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING FACILITY I. PREAMBLE This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") between THE BOEING COMP ANY ("Owner" or "Boeing"), a Delaware corporation, and the CITY OF RENTON ("Renton"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, is entered into pursuant to the authority ofRCW 36.70B.170 through .210, under which a local government may enter into a development agreement with an entity having ownership or control of rea! property within its jurisdiction. II. RECITALS A. Owner own.'1 approx.imately 280 acres of real property, known as the Boeing Renton Aircraft Manufacturing Facility ("Renton Plant" or "Plant"), located in Renton, King County, Washington, as more particularly described in Exhibit 1, attached. Since the early 1940s, the Plant has been used to manufacture military and commercial airplanes. B. The majority of the Renton Plant site has historically been zoned for heavy industrial use and has, for several years, been designated Employment Area- Industrial by the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Since 2000, a parcel along the Plant's eastern boundary has been zoned lH and designated by the Comprehensive Plan as Employment Area-Transition (Interim) and a nearby parcel has been zoned CO and designate-0 by the Comprehensive Plan as Employment Area-Office. C. In 2002, Owner informed Renton of its plan to consolidate its Renton Plant operations to the site area west of Logan Avenue, an effort commonly known as the ·'Move-to-the-Lake." Move-to-the-Lake is, among other things, intended to release underutilized land as surplus for eventual sale and redevelopment. D To provide certainty and efficiency to Owner with respect to further development of the Renton Plant for airplane manufacturing purposes, to encourage continued airplane manufacturing by Owner at the Renton Plant, and in anticipation of ootential future redevelopment effortS, Owner and Renton entered into a Dc~elopment Agreement ("2002 Agreement") on June 28, 2002, by Resolution 11/WOJ Pal(: I No. 3568 which, among other things, established baseline trip counts, redevelopment credit and vesting of land use regulations under certain circumstances for ongoing Renton Plant operations and potential redevelopment. E. Based on further discu:,sions between Owner and Renton regarding potential opportunities for redevelopment of the Renton Plant site, in phnses, over time, Renton resolved. by Resolution 3589, on October 14, 2002, to conduct environmental review in the fonn of an environmental impact statement ("EIS") pursuant to the State Environmental rolicy Act ("SEPA") of(a) potential alternatives for redevelopment of all or a portion of the Renton Plant site and (b) related public infrastructure. Resolution 3589 also established a conceptual public/private framework for the eventual mitigation of the impacts of Renton Plant redevelopment on transportation infrastructure and public services. F. On December 4, 2002, Owner and Renton entered into an agreement concerning the funding and constmction of lhe extension of Strander Blvd. across Owner's Longacres property ("Strander Agreement"). Among other things, the Strander Agreement establishes a $1. 7 million Mmsportation mitigation credit to Boeing that may b~ used to pay for transportation improvements needed to support dcvdopment of Owner's properties located in Renton. G On December 16, 2002, Owner submitted an application to Renton for amendment of the C;:,mprehensive Plan designation applicable to the Renton Plant site ("Comprehensive Plan Application") from IH to Employment Area -Transition (''EAT"). Renton elected to designate the area under a new Comprehensive Plan designation and combine the Comprehensive Plan Application with amendments proposed by Renton to the zoning text, zoning map and development standard for the Renton l'la.rit site H. On December 20, 2002, Renton imposed, by Resolution 3609, a Moratorium on development in area, of Renton, including the Renton Plant, zoned HI. One state<! reason for the Moratorium was Renton's desire to "provide adequate time for Renton staff to prepare and present proposed changes to the Comprehensive Pl:m and zoning" of those area!. zonr.d heayy industrial (IH}. I. On January 13, 2003, 1he City Council held a public hearing on the Moratorium. At the request of the Boeing Company, Renton 1U11ended the Moratorium to allow Boeing to consolidate its focilities within the Renton Plant. After the January 13, 2002 pubhc hearing, the Renton City Council adopted Resolution 3613 which continued the Moratorium in those areas of Renton zoned li80f/l\(J J)....,,-/\grccmerit 11-24-03 docl heavy industrial (IH), but also agreed to support Boeing's "Move-to-the-Lake" including any required building modification or construction. J. On June 9, 2003, the City Council amended the Moratoriwn for a second time by the adoption of Resolution 3639. Resolution 3639 lifted the Moratori1m1 over 1-H zoned areas located within the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The Renton Plant is the only I-H zoned property of any significant size that continues to be bound by the Moratorium, which is scheduled to expire on December 2, 2003. K. On March 4, 2003, Renton's Environmental Review Committee ("ERC") adopted a determination of significance for the Proposal. Renton issued a Scoping ~otice and Scoping Document for the EIS on March 10, 2003. On March 25, :2003. a public scoping meeting was held to receive written and oral comments on the proposed scope of study. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued by the ERC on July 9, 2003. A public hearing was held on July 30, 2003. A thirty day comment period on the DEIS was closed on August 8, 2003. The Final EIS was issued un October 21, 2003. L. Portions of the Proposal were the subject of a Renton Planning Commission hearing held November 12, 2003; the Proposal and related modifications to Renton' s existing parking code, site development plan review ordinance, and binding site plan ordinance were the subject of the City Council Hearing held on November 17, 2003. The City Council adopted all by ordinance on November 24, 2003. M. Owner has determined that the portions of the Renton Plant Site known as Lor 3 mul the I 0-50 site will become under-utilized at the completion of Move-to- the-Lake. Consequently, those portions of the Plant may be surplused and made available for sale, in the near future. IN LIGHT OF TilE FOREGOING, and because successful redevelopment of all or portions of the Renton Plant site will be oflong-term benefit to both Renton and Owner, Renton and Owner do hereby agree as follows: rn. AGREEMENT I. Definitions ; . l Arterial Roads means the primary public roads supporting District I and 2 Redevelopment, as diagrammed in plan and section and described on Exhibit 2 [,HOl:::ING ~ ,\µ-'--ctnenf 1 f-2-'-0J, doc) I lf24/0.\ Pagc3 attached, with typical sections of1he individual Arterial Roads shown in Exhibits 2A through 2E (herinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit 2). 1.2 Boeing means The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, and related or subsidiary entities. I. 3 Design Guidelines means the Urban Center Design Overlay Reg1J!ations established by Renton to supplement the Development Regulations with respect to the design of certain uses permitted within the UC-N zone. 1.4 Development Regulations means those portions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) zoning provisions that govern certain aspects of site planning, building design, landscape requirements and other elements of development within a given zone. 1.5 District I means that area of the Renton Plant Site located east of Logan A venue, as designated on Exhibit 3 attached. 1.6 District 2 means that area of the Renton Plant Site located west of Logan A venue, as designated on Exhibit 3. 1.7 Economic Benefit Analysis means the calculation of estimated one time and recurring revenue..~ and jobs gem,'fllted by a proposed RedeYelopment project. 1. 8 Franchise Utilities means electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, and other utilities not proVJdcd by Renton. 1.9 Interchanges mean access points from Renton roadways to and from Interstate 405. l. l O Intersections mean the general areas where two or more roadways join or cro.,s, including the roadways and roadside facilities for traffic movement within them. I. l I Land Use Policies and Regulations means Renton Comprehensive Plan policies, Development Regulations and Design Guidelines. 1.12 Local Roads means 1111 on-site roads that arc not Arterial Roads and that are necessitated by Redevelopment. I . 13 ofl:Site Intersections means intersections not included within District I or Distrkt 2. 1.14 On-Site Intersections means the intersections shown on Exhibit 4. 1.15 Owner means Boeing and any transferee or successor-in-interest of all or any portion of the Renton Plant. 1.16 Proposal means, collectively, O.vner's Comprehensive Plan Application and related zoning and Development Regulation amendments proposed by Renton. 1.17 RMC means the Renton Municipal Code. I . 18 Redevelopment means construction of improvements to the Renton Plant for uses other than airplane manufacturing or uses supporting or associated with airplane manufacturing. I . 19 Renton Plant Operations means airplane manufacturing and supporting or associated uses conducted on the Renton Plant Site. 1.20 Renton Plant Site means District I and District 2, collectively, as shown on Exhibit 3. 1.21 Site Plan Process means the master planning and site plan requirements of the RMC applicable to Redevelopment within the UC-N zone. I .22 Subdistrict J A means that portion of District 1 commonly known as Parking Lot 3 and the 10-50 Building as shown on the Subdistrict IA Conceptual Plan. 1.23 Subdistrict I B means that portion of District I commonly known as the !0-80 site, Lot 10, and other Boeing-owned parcels east ofLogan Avenue and south of 8'h Street. 1.24 Subdistricts means Subdistrict I A, Subdistrict 18, and District 2, collectively. 1.25 Utilities me1111s water, sewer and stormwater system improvement'! that serve the Renton Plant Site. 2, Basis of Agreement 2.1 latent This Agreement establishes certain roles and ,espo,1sibilities for the potential philSed Redevelopment of all or a poition of the Renton Plant Site, including but not limited to Renton commitments for corresponding potential funding and construction of certain public infrastructure improvements benefiting the Renton Plant Site and the community at lar~ and Owner commitments to participate in the funding of certain public irnprovements, to fund all private aspects of Redevelopment, and to retievelop the Renton Plant Site consistent with applicable Land Use Policies and Reguh1tions. 2.2 SEPA Decision Dorument This Agreement is entered into in lieu of a SEP A "Decision Document" and. as such, establishes all SEP A-ba~ed conditions necessary to mitigate potential adverse impacts of the Proposal, and Renton's i:pproval of the Subdistrict IA Conceptual Reta :I Plan. 3. Redevelopment Planning Redevelopment of the Renton Plru1t Site may occur incrementally starting with properties within Subdistrict I A. Conceptual planning for the possible surplus and sale of property will occur in three areas of the Renton Plant Site, Subdistrict I A, Subdistrict I B. and District 2, as illw.trated in Exhibit 3. Conceptual planning. pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, will be supplemented by master planning and site planning pursuant to the requirements ofRMC' 4-9-200. 3.1 Cpaceptul Pia• At the time at which Owner wishes to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property wirhin the Subdistricts for uses not related to airplane manufacturing or supponing US<!S, it will submit to Renton a Conceptual Plan including: 3.1.1 A narrative desctibing the conceptual Redevelopment proposal and its relationship to lhe Rcnton's Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center--North; 3.1.2 The estimated timing and sequencing of property surplus and sale (if applicable); 3.1.3 A description of the proposed uses including the general mix of types, estimated square footage of each building and parking for each structure, heights and residential densities; 3.1.4 The general location of use concentrations (i.e., residential neighborhoods, office or retail cores, ~tc.); [MOblNG 0.:\ .\gr.:cmclle II -2-4-03 dC1CI 11,24,0, P1gc6 3 .1.5 Vehicular and pedestrian circulation that includes a hie:-archy and general location of type, including arterials, pedestrian-oriented streets, other local roads and pedestrian pathways; 3 .1.6 General location and size of public open space; and 3.1. 7 An economic benefit analysis demonstrating the conceptual development's anticipated economic impact to local, regional and state governments. 3.2 Conceptual Plan Approval Owner will submit the Conceptual Plan to the City Council for approval. The Council will base its approval on the proposed Conceptual Plan's fulfillment of the adop1cd Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center-North. 3.3 Subsequent Land Use Approvals Renton will evaluate all subsequent development pennit applications within the Subdistricts based on "onsistency with the approved Conceptual Plan. The process for subsequent master plan and site plan approval is outlined in RMC 4-9-200. 3.4 Modifications to Approved Conct.ptual Plans 3.4.1 Modifications to an approved Conceptual Plan may be made after an administrative detennination of the significance of the proposed modification. 3.4.2 Minor modifications to an approved Conceptual Plan may be approved administratively as long as the proposed modifications remain consistent with the spirit and intent of the adopted Plan. 3.4.3 If it is detennined that a proposed modification is inconsistent with the spirit and intent of the adopted Conceptual Plan, or if an entirely new Conceptual Plan is proposed, City Council approval is required. 3.5 Subdistrict IA Cooce1>tual Retail Plan Owner has produced a Subdistrict I A Conceptual Retail Plan, auached as Exhibit 5, that meets the requirements of Section 3, outlining proposed Redevelopment of Subdistrict I A. By adoption of this Agreement, the City Council approves this plan $ the Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict I A. 3.5.1 The Subdistrict IA Retail Conceptual Plan includes development of approximately 450,000 sq. t\. of large-and medium-format retail stores and f.'BOflNG tk.,. Ag1cemcnc 11-24·03 docl 11'24!03 Page 7 approximately 110,(K)() sq. ft. of small retail shops, as well as potential locations for stroctured parking and upper story multi-family residential units or office uses. 3.5.2 An Economic Benefit Analysis for Subdistrict I A of the Redevelopment, attached as part of Exhibit 5, demonstrates that the Subdistrict IA Retail Conceptual Plan, which is forecast to produce estimated revenues to Renton of approximately $1.2 million in one-time, construction related revenues and an escalation to approximately S 1.5 million in recurring annual revenues to support Subdistrict 1 A Retail Redevelopment beginning in 2009, demonstrates revenues sufficient to fund Renton's obligation to construct public infrastructure supporting Subdistrict JA Retail Redevelopment subject to Section 4, below. 3.6 Additional Planning Applicable Owner acknowledges that additional site planning based on the requirements of the RMC will be required for potential Redevelopment within the Subdistricts. For example, should Subdistrict I A be further divided by short plat, lot boundary adjustment or otherwise, master planning and site planning for each parcel and building site pursuant to RMC 4-9-200 would be required. 4. Infrastructure Required to Support Redevelopment Transportation and trunk utilities anticipated to be necessary to support Redevelopment and the manner in which each will be ftmded and developed are discussed bl!Jow. Exhibit 2 generally illustrates each segment of Arterial Roads. Exhibits 6A, 68, 7, 7 A. 78 and 8 illustrate supporting trunk utilities. Exhibit 9 describes infrastructure components and corresponding anticipated cost. 4.1 Transportation Improvements 4.1.1 Arterial Roads Required at Full Build Out The parties agr.:e that the Arterial Roads diagrammed on Exhibit 2 and listed on Exhibit 9, will he necessary to support full redevelopment of the Renton Plant Site, including District 2, assuming an intensity of total site Redevelopment no greater than Alternative 4 studied in the EIS. 4.1.2 Subdistrict IA Arterial Roads The partie:i agree that the Arterial Roads or portions thereof diagrammed on Exhibit 1 O as District I, Subdistrict 1 A roads and listed by segment on Exhibit 9 are anticipated to be necessary for full Subdistrict IA Redevelopment. 4.1.3 Subdistrict I B Arterial Roads The parties agree that the Art<..Tial Roads or portions thereof diagrammed on Exhibit 10, with typical sections of the individual Arterial Roads shown in Exhibits JOA through JOE (hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit 10) as District 1, Subdistrict l B and listed by segment an Exhibit 9 are anticipated to be necessary for full Subdistrict I B Redevelopment. 4.1.4 Other Arterials 1l1e cost of required improvements to arterial roads not addressed by this Agreement will be paid by property owne1~ or developers benefited by the improvement based on a fair share alloc11tion of total cost. 4.1.5 Arterial Road and Other Public Infrastructure Funding 4.1.5.l Renton agrees to design and construct the Arterial Roads and cernin other elements of public infrastructure specified below at Renton's sole cost and expense; provided, that Renton will rely on revenues from sales tax on construction, increased sales tax from Redevelopment improvements and the property tax and other revenues generated by Redevelopment to fund its share of the public infrastructure anticipated under this Agreement. · 4.1.5.2 Renton will retain one-third (1/3) of the collected tax and other revenues generated by Redeveiopment, and will set aside the remaining two- thirds (213) for infrastructure improvements anticipated in this Agreement as necessary to timely support Redevelopment within the Subdistricts. 4.1.5.3 Renton inttnds to utilize limited tax general obligation debt to fund Arterial Roads and other public infrastructure under this Agreement, to be paid for by revenues generated by Redevelopment pursuant to the terms of Section 4.1.5.1. For example, $12,000,000 in bonds wo:;J)d require approximately $1.000,000 per yell!' in debt service for a 20-year bond at 5% interest. Similarly, $7,500,000 in bonds would req1Jire approximately $625,000 per year in debt service and $4,000,000 in bonds would require approximately $333,000 in debt service. 4.1.5.4 Should tax revenues fall short of those necessary to timely install all infrastructure improvements required for a particular Redevelopment project, Kenton may delay infrastructure construction until the tax revenue shortfall is remedied. I lf.14/03 Page:9 4.1.5.5 In the event of an infrastructure delay, Renton will immediately notify Owner and (if Owner is a non-Boeing entity) Boeing of its need to delay and representatives of the parties will meet to discuss a cure, which may include (at Owner's or Boeing's option) the provision of alternative financing pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement. 4.1.6 Arterial Rights of Way 4.1.6. I Owner agrees to dedicate, at no cost to Renton, the land necessary for the rights of way described in Exhibit 2, at the time that land on which the right, of ways are located is sold; provided, that (a) Renton may request earlier d">dication, which Owner may approve in its sole discretion, which approval shall not be unre35onably withheld, and (b) easements or license agreements will be provided by Renton to Boeing, as Boeing oeems necessary, to allow continued operation of facilities within the right of way thal support Renton Plant Operations. That is, the parties intend that, if approved, such early dedication would not result in additional cost to or dislocation of Renton Plant Operations. 4. I .6.2 Should there be Owner buildings located in the right~ of way, it shall be the responsibility of Owner to, at such time as the road needs to be constructed, and upon Renton's request, (a) demolish such buildings and (b) cap and abandon any underground facilities that would interfere with Renton's use of the dedicated property for right of way purposes. 4.1.6.3 Park Avenue is constn1cted asymmetrically within the current right of way. Expansion of Park Avenue anticipates use of the existing road. Some additional realignment may be necessary to connect Park Avenue to Logan. Owner will dedicate the necessary right of way to realign Park Avenue to provide symmetricnl right of way and as anticipated for expansion under Exhibit 2. Renton will vacate an::: excess right of way created by such realignment, at no expense to Owner. Should Owner have a building occupying property that would need to be dedicated to Renton for right of way, then Owner shall grant the right of way, except for the portion occupied by the building. In such case Owner will reserve the right of way for Renton, and provide the dedication at no cost to Renton when the building is demolished. 4.1.6.4 Renton ~hall not vacate any right of way dedicated by Boeing necessary to serve Redevelopment, until redevelopment is complete or upon the approvu.1 of Boeing and Owner. 11124/0J Page 10 4.1.7 Design Fund and Timing 4. I. 7. l Renton agrees, within 30 days of the date of this Agreement, to eannark $1.5 million for funding of Arterial Road design and engineering ("Arterial Road Design Fund" or "Fund"). The Fund will be utilized, as needed, to ensure that design and engineering of the Arterial Roads occur in collaboration with Owner and sufficiently in advance of Redevelopment project construction to produce needed Arterial Roads in time lo serve such Redevelopment. The parties agree that Renton shall begin the consultant selection process for design of Arterial Roads within 30 days of the date of this Agreement. 4.1. 7 .2 With respect to Subdistrict I A Arterial Roads, Renton will begin design, through its consultant, of the intersection of Park and Logan as the first task of the consultant selected pursuant to Section 4.1.7.1. This early design shall be completed as soon as reasonably possible for the purpose of defining the )O\;!ltion and extent of the needed right of way of the intersection of Park Avenue and Logan Avenue. Owner and Renton will consult on a right of way definition sufficient ~o pennit Owner to establish its property lines for purposes of sale. 4.1.8 General Construction Timing Construction of all or portions of Arterial Roads required for each increment of Redevelopment will occur based upon (a) need for that portion of the Arterial Road as demonstrated by a SEPA environmental checklist prepared for that increment of Redevelopment, a traffic study, or other documentation agreed to by the parties, and (b) a construction schedule established by Renton and approved by Owner to ensure final completion of such Arterial Roads, for each increment of Redevelopment, prior to issuanct of the first occupancy pennit for that increment; provided, that if such Art~ri11l Road construction is not timely completed, Renton shall identify and construct, nt its cost, mutually acceptable interim access. 4.2 Intersections 4.2.1 On-Site Intersections The cost of On-Site Intersections will be paid by Renton according to the principles set forth in Section 4.1.5, except that Owner will pay (a) the cost of left turn lanes necessary to provide access to Redevelopment and (b) that portion of the cost of the traffic signal necessary to support left turn movements. [!AOf:IN(i O~, A.9r~mient I l~l-1.0J doc) I lfl4JO) P:age 11 4.2.2 Off.Site Intersections The cost of Off-Site Intersections will be paid jointly by the parties in shares proportionate to the amount of predicted traffic using the development and the amount of predicted u-affic that is general pass-through traffic. These traffic predictions will be made by use of a mutually acceptable traffic forecasting model. Owner's contribution will be proportionate to the percentage of the traffic trips using the development, and Renton's contribution will be proportionllle to the percentage of the traffic trips that are general purpose pass through trips. 4.2.3 Boeing Trip Allocation Boeing agrees that it will allocate up to 1,500 of the "baseline trips" established by the 2002 Agreement for Redevelopment of District l. It is understood that this Agreement is based upon reallocation of up to l,SOO trips in order to mitigate or minimize the need for additional transportation improvements. The method, timing and di~tribution of each trip shall be at Boeing's sole discretion. If, however, Boeing's reservation of all or a portion of the 1,500 trips results in the need for transportation improvements that would have been otherwise unnecessary, Boeing wHI bear the cost of those improvements. 4.3 laterchanges The parties agree to collaborate on lobbying and other efforts to receive state and federal funding of 1-405 interchange improvements that benefit Redevelopment. 4.4 Local Roads Owner agrees to pay for all Local Roads required for Redevelopment. 4.5 Transportation Mitigation Fees Renton agrees that Renton trnnsportation mitigation fees a11sessed as mitigation for Redevelopment will be used to fond off-site improvements, required to support Redevelopment, in proportionate shure of the cost of such improvements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, transportation impact fees shall not be devoted to On- Site Improvements or for site access improvements required by Redevelopment, such · as left tum lanes on periphery street,. 4.6 Strander Agreement Transportation Mitigation Fee Credits The parties acknowledge that, at Boeing's sole discretion, all or a portion of the reserve account established by the Strander Agreement may be utilized to pay for I l/24Kll Plgc 12 all or a portion of Boeing's transportation obligations associated with Redevelopment. except that such credit may not be applied to reduce Boeing's share of the On·Site Intersection improvements addressed by Section 4.2.1. 4.7 Water 4. 7. I Renton shall, according to the principles set forth in Section 4.1.5, install water lines to support redevelopment in coordination with the construction of Arterial Roads. 4.7.2 Water lines installed shall be consistent with the "Option I" plan provided by Renton's Department of PlWllling, Building and Public Works, described on Exhibits 6A and 6B, attached. 4.7.3 Owner and Renton will work together to create a water plan to ensure provision of adequate routine (non-emergency) water and emergency water, including fire flow protection, to the Renton Plant Site, for continued Renton Plant Operations and for Redevelopment, including but not limited to an :igreement that water for Renton Plant Operations will be of adequate pressure, quantity, quality and have required system redundancy. 4.8 Stormwater Conveyance Renton shall, ac..:ording to the principles set forth in Section 4.1.5, install a stormwater drainage and collection system to support Redevelopment, in coordination with the construction of Arterial Roads. The system to be installed is referred to as Option I B in Exhibit 7, which anticipates reuse of a portion of the Boeing stonnwater dminage and collection system. The segment lengths, type of improvement, needed right of way, length of laterals and es1ima1ed costs of these segments is set forth in Exhibit 7 A. If all or a portion of Boeing's stonnwatcr drainage and collection system is used, Boeing agrees to grant Renton an easement for maintenance, repair and replacement of that system and title to the stonnwater drainage and collection system . being used by Renton. 4.9 Sanitary Sewer 4.9.1 Renton shall, ac~rding to the principles set forth in Section 4.1.5. install sewer main lines to support redevelopment, in coordination with the construction of Arterial Roads. 4.9.2 Sewer main lines shall be installed consistent with the proposed plan provided by Renton's Department of Public Works, described on Exhibit. 8, attach.:d. 4.10 Franchise Utilities Provision for Franchise Utilities must be made, in conjunction with installation of the Arterial Roads. Franchise Utilities and Owner shall bear the cost of any out-of- pockct design costs, extra trenching, conduit, sleeves or other installations to provide for Franchise Utilities. Owner and Renton agree to reuse existing assets, if both parties agree that such reuse is feasible. 5. A ltemative Financing 5.1 Triggering Events Should Renton be unable to timely fund public infrastructure improvements or should Owner or Boeing (if Owner i:; a non-Boeing entity) determine that it requires construction of all or a portion of public infrastructure for Redevelopment on a schedule more expedited than this Agreement provides, then, subject to the provisions of Section 5.1 hereof. the parties hereto agree that, Owner or Boeing may choose, at its sole discretion, to provide alternative financing for all or a portion of public infrastmcture by one of the following means: 5.2 Potential Alternative Financing Methods 5.2. I Owner or Boeing or some other party may build al! or a portion of the Arterial Roads and other infrastructure improvements described in Section 4 of this Agreement and sell all or any portion of the public infrastructure to Renton or other applicable governmental authority pursuant to a conditional sales contract, lease purchase or installment purchRSe arrangement or similar method, the effect of which shall be to ca\.lSe the lease or purchase payment obligation to qualifJ as a promise to pay within the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 5.2.2 Renton, or some other governmental authority, may issue revenue bonds if and to the extent that the property to be financed is to be included in u utility, ~ystern or similar enterprise with respect to which revenues are expected to be available for the ultimate repayment of the capital cost of such property. 5.2.3 Renton may issue such other or further debt or other obligations, including any tax increment obligations, which Renton is now or hereafter legally authorized to issue. 5.2.4 To the extent that any alternative financing may be structured in a manner which wi:I permit nationally recognized bond counsel to opine that the interest on any obligation is excludable from gross income of the holde{ of any obligation for federal income tax purposes, then Renton end Owner or Boeing covenant and agree to cooperate in good faith to structure the alternative financing in such manner. 5.3 Repayment 5.3. l In the event that Owner or Boeing exercises its right of alternative financing pursuant to Section 5.1, the parties shall cooperate in good faith to enter into an agreement, pursuant to which the parties shall identify any and all tees. user charges, revenues, taxes and other benefits wnich are expected to result directly or indirectly, either from the public infrastructure so constructed or acquired or from the transactions contemplated hereby, in order to detennine the aggregate benefits ro Renton and any other funds that Renton may obtain from other governmental authorities. 5.3.2 The parties agree that they shall, to the maximum extent not prohibited by law, directly or in<lirectly allocate two-thirds (2/3) of such taxes, revenues and other benefits identified in 5.3. I, over time, to pay amounts due with respect to i:lltemative financing, or to reimburse Renton or related governmental authority therefor. To the extent that such benefits arc not permitted by law to be directly allocated to pay debt service or similar obligations, the parties hereto agree that such benefits shall nonetheless be taken into account directly or indirectly in determining the total amounts of public resources which shall be alloc11ted to repay such costs, so that the net benefits resulting from the transactions and public infrastructure are allocated or deemed allocated for such pWJ)Oses, in a fair and equitable manner. It is further agreed that any costs of issuance of such public financings. any capitalized interest thereon or any similar fees and expenses shall, to the extent permitted by law, be included in the amount so financed and shall be similarly repaid. {IBOHNL; ()(1,1 .-'\r,rc:cm~t 11-24-03 doc! II /24/()3 Page JS 6. Vesting 6.1 Site-Wide Vesting to Comprehensive Plan, Zoning use Tables, and Site Plan Process for Term of Agreement Upon signing of this Agrecmen,, the Renton Plant Site is vested through the term of this Agreement to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Use tables, and Site Plan Process in place as of the date of this Agreement. 6.2 .\ddltional Vesting to Development Regulations and Design Guidelines at Time of Conceptual Plan Approval 6.2.1 Generally Vesting to Development Regulations and Design Guidelines shall occur at the time of Conceptual Plan approval pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement. Such vesting shall extend for three years from the date of Conceptual Plan approval for Subdistricts I A and I B, and extend for five years from the date of Conceptual Plan Approval for District 2 ("Conceptual Plan Vesting Period"). Development Reguhttions and Design Guidelines rnay be extended beyond the Conceptual Plan Vesting Period if a materially compl~te application for master plan approval, pursuant to RMC, for all or a portion of the Conceptual Plan area is submitted to Renton prior to the end ofthc Conceptual Plan Vesting Period, in which case such vesting shall be extended as to duration and area only for the master plan area according to the terms of the master plan approval. 6.2.2 Vesting to Dev"lopmeot Regulations and Design Guidelines for Subdistrict IA Conceptual Piao The Subdistrict 1 A Conceptual Retail Plan approved pursuant to Section 3.~ of this Agreement is hereby vested for three years as provided by Sectiol' 6.2.1. 6.2.3 Additional Time Necessary to Finalize Non-Retail Development Regulations and Design Guidelines The parties acknowledge that non-retail Development Regulations and Design Guidelines will not be in final form 11s of the date of this Agreement. Renton shall consult with Boeing as it finalizes such standards and guidelines and make best efforts to submit such non-retail Development Regulations and Design Guidelines to City Council for adoption, no later than April I, 2004. [ITlO[ISG Dn i\gr~mcnl I l ·H-03 Joe) 11124/0) Page 16 6.2.4 Changes to Applicable Land Use Policies and Regulations During any vested period, should Renton amend its Land Use Policies and Regulations, Boeing may elect to have such amended Policies and Regulations apply to Redevelopment; provided, that the Development Services Director must agree lo such election, which agreement shall not be unreasontbly withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Renton reserves the authority under RCW 36. 70B. l 70(4) to impose new or ditforent regulations, to the extent requirvd by the federal or state governments, or by a serious throat to public health and safety, such as changes or additions to the family of building and fire codes, as determined by the Renton City Council, after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to Owner. 7. Additional Development Agreements May Be Necessary TI1e parties agree tha, other development agreements, in addition to and following this Agreement, may be necessary to guide Redevelopment over time. That is, should all or a portion of District 2 be surplused, the parties (IJlticipate that this Agreement would be supplemented by one or more additional development agreements, addressing issues such as open space, and new internal pul;lic and private road network and public facilities. For example, the parties anlicipate that construction of additional water, sanitary and stormwakr utility infrastructure, necessary for the Redevelopment of District 2, beyond that associated wilh the Arterial Roads discussed in Section 4, and which have been com'.eprually reviewed by Renton, as shown in .Exhibits 6, 7 and 8, will be covered by future development agreements, and that the cost of such will generally be the responsibility of Owner. In addition, the parties anticipate that District 2 Redevelopment will include public and private open space amenities. Such amenities may include one or more contiguous parcels that provide recreational amenities and public access to Lake Washington, create view .:orridors to Lake Washington and Mount Rainier, and serve as focal points for Redevelopment. 8. Marketing Information Boeing will generally share with Renton marketi11g infonnation for Renton Plant Redevelopment effons so that Renton will be informed about the marketing Vl:H >El;,.:(i ax, ,\ftn:cmCffl 11~14-03 doc I 11/24/0J Page 17 process. and additionally, so that Renton can adequately respond to inquiries by prospective purchasers. 9. Potential Renegotiation Based upon changed or unforeseen circumstances, Renton or Boeing may request renegotiation of one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, which request shall not be unreasonably denied. 10. Termination of Moratorium Renton agrees that the Moratorium shall tenninate or expire on December 2, 2003 or on the date that the Proposal truces effect, whichever occurs first. 11. 2CI02 Agreement This Agreement shall not be deemed to amend or supercede the 2001 Agreement, which remains in full force and effect. 12. Recording This Agreement. upon execution by tl1e parties and approval of the Agreement by resolution of the City Council, shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Election.~ Department. 13. Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of Owner and Renton and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to successors in interest to all or a ponion of the Renton Plant Site. 14. Counterparts TI1is Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IS. Termination ·n1is Agreement shall tenninate on December 31, 2020. AGREED this / sf' day of ___ {)~ , 2003. (/B(')f ING°""' Avcc~ 11-l-l-4D d,lC} 11n•J03 Page 18 • CITY OF RENTON lly: -J,>s§_Se!L_JTl..i!.!Jnil\:.L__~_ ... Its-~~ Y:::.or=------~~.llliii By: Colette Jammlok hs: _J,uthodZed Signatory STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF k \ '0" ) ATTEST: By: Bonnie I. Walton Its C: ty ClP.rk A~~ City Attorney · · By: Its: Vice President On this .ls1_ day of D'° c .:-• C":1 "-.-, 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly comnrissioned and sworn, personally appeared ·r it's:<; .... _( l'l.i'> I','° c-• to me known to be the person who signed as {\.. o,. ~ or of the CITY Of' RENTON, the corporation that execued the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said cprporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he_ was duly elected, qualified and acting as said offic<..T of the corporation. that he_ was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal allixed. if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. (.'BOEts<i Ile\ ,\gr~t'mrnl 11-24-03 doc) 11/WOJ P11ge 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the S,tate of Washington, residing at ~-\*{ s: My appointment expires: ct I I b>-r . 11 '24fOJ Pae:e.:O ST ATE OF WASHINGTON) ./ ) ss. COUNTY OF N"') ) On this R day of futmh1 l( • • 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Sta~e11 of ash in~, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared C4\ d'.tk 1'41. , to me known to be the person who signed as ' of THE BOEING COMPANY, the corporation that executed the in and oregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that 1)he. was duly electet~ qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation, that fi\c , was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the <lay and year first above written. (Signature ofNotary) rP<JnGi,a J'.. s @i:;-rl\: (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOT ARY PUBLIC in and f\)f the State of Washington, residing at NtiA(Ytfu U:,.,. My appointment expires: '.),,"l,QI, ' . j-t30UNO Ile\· Ar,rrca1ent 11.:U-OJ ®Cl EXHIBIT I LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION Trncls A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H located m Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, all in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M , described as follows: TR/>.CT A (Tax Pa=I Nos. 082305-9019, 082305-9209 & 722300-0I05 • portion) Parcels A and B of City of Renton of Renton Short Plat No 093-89, accorJ.mg to the short plat recorded under King Coonty Recordmg No 8911149006, records of King County, W ashlngton, TOGETHER WTI1l that portton of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of swd Section 8, lymg southerly and easterly of Parcel B of said short plat and westerly and no11herly of Park Ave N, and N. 6"' St., respectively TRACI' B. (fax Parcel No. 756460-0055) Lots l through 13, inclusive, Block 11 of Renton Farm Plat, according to the plat thereof recorded m Volume IOof Plats, page 97, r<,cords of King County, Washington, TOGETHER WITH Lots l through 12, inclusive, of Sartorisville, according to the plat thereof recorded m Volume 8 of Plats, page 7, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT thal poltion known as Lot 3 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 282-79, according to the short plat recorded under King County Recording No 7907109002, records of King County, Washington; and EXCEPT roads :rRACJJ,; (Tax Parcel Nos 722300-0115 & 722300-0105 -ponion) Blocks 3 and 4 of Renton Farm Acreage, 11CCordmg to the plat thereof recorded in VoJunl<' 12 of Plats, page 37, records of King County, Woshinglon; TOGETIIBR WITH those portions of the alley vacated under City of Renton Vacation Ordinance Nos. 3319 and 4048 and the street vacated under Cily of Renton Ordinance Nos. 3319 and 3327 as would attach by operation of law; and TOGE'IllER WITH that portion of the noJthwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 8 lying soulhcrly of the southerly right of way margm of N. 8111 St, easterly of the CllStcrly right of way margin of Park Ave N. and north of the south 315 feet thereof. ™CT D (Tax Parcel Nos. 082305:9220, 082305·9221, 082305-9222 & 082305-901 l) Lots I, 2, 3 and 4 ofC11y of Renton Shon Plat No. LUA-01-056-SHPL, nccording to the short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 20011205900004, records of King County, Washington TRACl' E (Tax Parcel Nos 082305-9037, 082305-9152, 082305-9079, 082305-9204) Those poruons of said Government Lots I and 2 of Secuon 7, lymg within the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad right of way (fonncrly Northern Pacific, Lake Washington Belt Lmc) and northerly of the northerly nght of way margm nf N.6th St.: TOGETIIBR WITH ~aid northwes: quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 8, .lying northerly of the northerly nght of way margm of N. ti" St and westerly of the westerly right of way margin of Park Ave N.; EXCEPT City of Renton Short Plat No. 89-093, as recorded under KJDg Counly Recordmg No 8911149006, and EXCEPT (hat portion of said northwest quarter of the southwest qmrter lymg southerly and easterly of said short plat; and TOGETHER WITH those portions of said Government Lots I, 2 and 3 and the southeast CjUarter of the northwest quarter of Sec!Jon 8, lying westerly and northwesterly, respec\i vely, of the westerly right of way margin of Parle Ave N. and the northwesterly right of way margin of the North Renton Interchange (SR 405), westerly of a lme that intersects with said northwesterly nght of way margin of the North Renton Interchange, said lmc wing described as beginrung at Station 6+50 on the A-Lme of the North Renton Interchange, SR 405, as shown oo Sh,;-et 2 of 5 of PSH 1 (SR 40S) North Renton lnlerchangc, Washington Stace Department ofTram;ponauon Right of Way Plan, and end mg northwesterly, perpendicular l(I said StatJOn, at n point on the southeasterly margin of the JOO foot main trar.k of Burlington Northern Railroad, easterly and southeasterly of the northwesterly nght of way !me of the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad nght of way rfonncrly Northern Pacific, Lake Waslungton Belt Line), EXCEPT from said abandoned rrulroad nghl of way that pon1on lying northwesterly of a hne descnbed as follows Begmning at a point 50 feet southeasterly, measured radially and at right angles to the centerline of the Burlington Northern mam track as now constructed, from Survey Stauon 1068+00, said pomt being on the southeasterly nght of way margin of the 100 foot wide nght of way, Thence not1hweslerly along said radial line a distance of 25 feet; Thence southwesterly in a strwght hne I(• a point 25 feet northwesterly, measured from the southeasterly r.gbt of way !me at Stallon 1074+<>0, Thence conlmuing southwesterly at an angle to the light, lo a point on the northwesterly margm of the JOO foot Burlington Northern Railroad nght of way, said pomt also bemg on the southeasterly line of the Spur Tract at J-leadblock Stal ion 8+85.5 and the end of said descnbed lme and EXCEPT !hat portion of said Government Lot 2 described as follows: Begmning al an intersection of the southeasterly right of way margin of said Burlington Northern Railroad and the northwesterly margm of vacated Mill St (Park Ave N) per Vacation Ord 2513, Thence southwesterly along said southeasterly margm of the railroad right of way, a distance of 60 feet; TI1ence soutll('.asterly, at nght angles to said railroad nght of way, a distance of IO feet, more or less, to a pomt on the northwesterly right of way margin of satd vacated M1.ll St (Park Ave N ), Thence northeasterly along said Mill St to the point of begmnmg· TOGETHER WITH portion of Vacated Lake Washmf!ton Bo\llcvard adJoming. TRACf F (Tax Parcel Nos. 072305-9046 & 072305-9001 -portion) Thal portion of the SE V.. of the SE 'A of said Section 7, lying southerty of N. 6u, St, westerly of Logan Ave N., easterly of the Cedar Raver Waterway (Commercial Waterway No. 2), and northerly of that certain tract of land conveyed to the Renton School District by Deed recorded under Kmg County Recordmg No. 5701684 TRACT G (Tax Pared No. 072305-9001 & 082305-9187) Thal pomon of said NE 1-4 and SE !4 of Seel.ion 7, NW \4 of Section 8, SW \4 of Section 5, and the SE \4 of Section 6, lying north of N 611, Street, easterly of the Cedar River Walcrway (Commerc1al Waterway No 2), westerly and northwesterly of the westerly nght of way line of the abandoned Burhngton Northern Railroad {formerly Northern Pacific. Lake Washington Belt Lme) 1t11d northwesterly of the northwe.~terly line of the ,a,lroad spur track bcgmrung at Headbiock Station 8+85.5, wes1erly of Lots "A" and "B" of City of Renton Lot Linc AdJUStment No. LUA-98-176-LLA as rtcorded under Kmg County Recording No 9902019014, and southerly of the Lake Wa~hington Inner Harbor Line; EXCEPT Logan Ave N TRACT H (Tax Parcel No. 072305-9100) That portion of the Burlington Northern Inc. (fonnerly Northern Pacific Railway Co.) 100 foot railway nght of way in said SE 1-4 of Section 7 and SW \4 of Section 8, lymg north of the nonherly right of way margin of N. 4·h Street and soulherly of the southerly nght of way margin of N. 6u, Street. All situate in the Caty of Renton, Kwg County, Washington. ------ --.. -~ --· ---. . ··------ -·-----. ----. ---' ··~· -z_ "G" %- -~ o_ "D" ~ N 6th St z <l> > ,c( C: 0 0 _J "E" z N 8th St 1-------1 N 61 St. 0 z "C~ -,( I : 7200 I 1, I I I I I ~ .... ~~· @ 'I\ "1,.M VIIW """' ..... .<e '\\ '. ' I .-'..-, . I \. \\ \ \ \~. \. I -~ • ';. • 'I . )\ ' ~ \\ ,;,-'·~ ,· '\ \ , .... I I . • ''' _._.,. L l., ~ ] [] ...... _..,..llO.. c::::::::J = =-:i" -=~i'° ~ ::::::"r" .. © --l-4-~- l!l'm--·--....... ---.... -... -- . ' ' I I . I PROPOSED ARTERIAL RIGHTS OF WAY •-d- =======T=0=S=U=P=PO=R=T=D=1S=T=R=IC=T=2====~~H,,:,,BIT 2 (FULL BUILDOUT) TYPICAL SECTION 1: PARK AVENUE NORTH FROM PROPOSED LOGAN AVENUE TO NORTH 8TH STREET 4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE -~ " _, -- EXHIBIT 2A ... a(l(t 0, -T lf01" li'-111.li 0 ~ 1_6' 3.2' FULL BUILDOUT SCAL( 1"-16" l:JQ1I: &CTratS AFE DRAv.N IN ACCORDA/'CE. W/1H 7J,£ KING CCJ..tiTY P.O,,J) STN>CJN>DS ND TI-E CITY CF RENTCII STREET St MOARDS A!..L ROADWAY SECT/CNS ;,./;E IU.US1RATIVE d•ill Cu>svltvr; Er>,~• IOI Srewart S&eG!. &lie BOO Seattle, Wuh/npto'l 9&)1 /206J 3B2-0500 Fax <206! 382-0SOO ,0 /'¥)VEMf!EFI 2003 TYPICAL SECTION 2: PARK AVENUE SOUTH FROM NORTH 8Ttl STREET TO NORTtl 6TH STREET EXHIBIT 28 4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE 1 ,------·---------.. ~tnJ-= :r"'!,.T,--------------~ -----------~~~~ t ,,_ _,,, ·-..... ~l.ac 'JU t:ntMJ . ...,_,.. fl! • "°10 -· ...... ,-, ~ ..... -- -~~l~g=J!!&=:At-i, ( > A I *J_~ b 'ti n:a:s -au.W ~ ,, ,,..:;1t..c -j VfV.llQ &I ~tr:, -.v .,,,.__ _______ """""'"""''--...J { 16' I 32' ! FULL BUILOOUT SCALE 1"'•16' 1:iDI£! SECTICNS ARE DRAl'Hi IN ACC()ffJNa wm1 11£ KIN3 CCI.NTY ROAD ST /WJAADS ,'JC) Tl-£ CITY O!' FENTON STl!EET STNO>KJS. ALi. ROl'DWAY SECT!Ci'IS ARE IUUSTRA Tl\£ lll·l•I ~tu,g ~ ()I St8watt S!r86l. $vile &XI --~C)'l 981:)J l206J :l8HlSOO Fax 120SJ 382-0500 I? NOVE/.BEFI 2003 TYPICAL SECTION 4: LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 8 LANES OF TRAFFIC WlTM A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE 5' BICYCLE LANES ON EACH SIOE OF ROADWAY 0 ~ ~ ..,!1::" I z·1: 1 ~J~C 1·:~ v.rc u,c v,,,,1 r.-....o ....c ui,;r u.c -.- ... .IIIIIMTO,~'l'W'tk" FULL BUILDOUT e' 1.e· 32' SCALE 1"a16' 1$)IJf.; SECTICNil AR£ C\'!Al",N IN A~ W17H 11-£ KING COUITY llO.sO ST~ NC 71-£ CfTY CF RENTa; STFEET STA/ON'Os. AU. ROADWAY 5cCno,.s NE IU.U97-"A TM;: iE=,, .. -- EXHIBIT 2C ~·- E \ ~''A " - ... ,,, CctsJltlrQ 6~ OI at-r S~eet Sv/rs 8/XJ -~"'9801 CIOtiJ 382-0600 Fa,, <2G6/ 382--0500 (/ f>.l'.)\SeEf'I 2003 TYPICAL SECTION 6: NORTH 8TH STREET 4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MED1ANITURNIN13 LANE EXHIBIT 2D ! I I 1r J ~ 1r _L_,, j "' I I I \\~ ~ ~~~ ~d ii --~ ...... _ IIDf1 Of • ., --------------~ FULL BUILOOUT 9 l}' 1.6' 32· SCALE 1••16' taIE! Sf:.CTtalS AA. DRAWN IN A~ wm, T}£ l<ING COVITY ROAD STNCJ>ROS A/>D 11£ CITY CF FENTON STl'l!3;T STl<NJAFC!S AU ROPDWAY SEC71CNS ARE ILJ.USmATI\IE iii•II•~~~ '°' Stswart -Su/le 8lX) Seattle. ~ 00,0, <2061 382--0600 Fa, /206! 382--0500 10~2003 TYPICAL SECTION 8: NORTH 10TH STREET .C LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE ~: _l_a_J_~c J l I ~"C &.u;t v...: I.NC ,.~J I 'lllW•lloCIIUi,fU ~· -,, ..... -. ....., ,.. lll!iMI" ~ ...... ..,,.,. _________ .c;_:.::::......1 FULL BUILDOUT 0 !' 1E' L. ! 32' I SCALE: 1'"-=16' M2J'1;; SECTrCH5 ARE CR'.~ JN ACCORDNCE wm-1 THE KW3 COU(TY ROAD ST.A>()AfOS AJ,l) 1H: CITY C'F AENTCW STREET Si A/DAROS ALL FlOAOWA Y Si:CTICX-,S ARE 11.1.USTRA TIYE. EXHIBIT 2E jjj.jp C01sultk'1) J;r,,,-s t:11 Stewwt Strset SuJte 800 Seattl<I. ~ 88,0J a?06I 3ll2--0600 Fax a?06I 382-0SOO ,0!/0~2003 ·--·-. . ~ -~ ·-. I\ \ -0 j J Districts Subject to Conceptual Plan Approval lkllo °"1,ld ti,c;,uod;tt1~1 ,.,~dc,dicaled R-0-W ..... °"" ........ "'~ t-'5-.,c PL--C ,...,rw,,.». __ .. (lf>d--· o .... --· Sub-District B Exhibit 3 [f >li I _.' :!/. - I .,I ,.·rr·c ' .' 1li\l'. \ I. ,,·"_,/,~ \ .• ', ' . ·, .·. . ' \ ! -'...-,·•-''71 I I I ~\\ I I i, ,\ ._.. t . \ I ,., I I I ' ' L D ON-SITE INTERSECTIONS EXHIBIT"'\ EXHIBIT " 5 " BOEING'S CONCEPTUAL URBAN RETAIL PLAN Renton, Washington Submitted to the City of Renton November 17, 2003 Background CONCEPTUAL URBAN RETAIL PLAN Lot :l and 10-50 Sites Renton, Washmgton The Ooe1ng Company has been workl ng with the City or Renton for more than a year 1n e-.·alUbtlng potent1ltl redevelopment strategies associated wtth Its 737 facility In Renton, Washington. Thts Conceptual Plan illustrates the 80elng Company's vlS1011 rcr the redevelopment or the first piece of the Renton Plant to be made available for non-tndustnal uses. The Plan lnclud<!S that portion of the property commonly referred to as the Lot 3 and 10-50 sites, which have been determined to be non- essential to the ongoing airplane manuractunng actr,,t1es as Boeing completes it's 'Move-to-the-Lake" consolidation plan. The Plan covers approximately 53 to 55 acres of gross land, of which approximately 8 acres are reSCfVed tor the development or tour new artenal streets that are e~-senttal to the ultimate redevelopment r;f the entire 280-aae aimpus. The rema1n1ng 45 to 47 acres or land will be marketed to entitles Interested tn develop,ng an integrated retarl center on the sit", COOSIStent With this Conceptual Plan. Included withm this submittal are a narrative descnpbon of Boelng's proposal, a Conceptual Planrung Oragram with sllpport1ng pedestnan street secbons, and an economic benefit analysis demonstrating a range of potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by the proposed development. Boeing seeks the C.ty's approval or this conceptual Pl8n so that Boeing can complete the necessary lot line adiustments and begin actively mar~ebng the property to local, reg,onal and natrorial developers and users. The aenal on the ro1towtng page highkghts the location of tile proposed retail site 1n relation to Boeing's remaining land holdings and the surroun<11ng North Renton ne,ghborhood. Conceptual UrlHln ftt1taU Plan Boeing believes that h,gh-quahty re1a,1 development IS essenbal to the successful trans1t1on of the area from its 1ndustnal roots to the Ccty's vis.on for the Urban Center-Nortll A well-designed retail center w!II proV1de employment, diversify the . economic base, offer a new sourc:e of murnapel revenue, and WIii attract other alternative and potentially higher and better uses to the surroundmg ~rea. The Conceptual Plan for tile Lot 3 aod 10-50 ,~es. rocated on the follow,ng page, 1!lustr"tes the cohesive re.iev~lopmeot of the pafcels anto en urban retail center. Toe Pian cont.ams a muc of large format .. dest1nabon .. retailers, m1d-slzed retail anchors, as well as smalt shop space concentrllted along Park Avenue, envmoned as the sigmflcant pedestnan-onented stret..lf 1n the area. The Plan responds to the presence of the ex1St1ng fry's bu1ld1ng on the property to the east of Garden Avenue, and l1ntic1pates tllat ultimate redevelopment of the northern portion or that site wdl rel~te d1rcctfy to the development occumng on Boeing's property Tho stte 1s bound by a comb1nat?on of eX1st1ng and new pubhc roedways, wh1th se<Jregate the property into four quadrants r.a ng1ng betWeen 6 and 19 aaes m 51ze. 600mg ,s seeking buyers for the 4S-to 47-acre Pf'OIM'rfy to undertake a cohesrve redevelopment. Generally, tile large format retail d<:velopment (users w,th footpnnts of 50,000 square feet and largor and building feawre heights up to 45 feet tall) ,s planned to occur along s'h, Logan and Garden Avenues, faang inward and supported by well~n,zed parking areas internal to the stte. These desbnat,on retail uses wUI naturally loate themSfflves eJong the Widest porbons of the property, w,th 9ood fn,eway vlstb1hty, moch like the recently completed Fry's development on the eastern ~de of Garden Avenue. Medium format reta1lers (rar,gmg between 10,000 and 50,000 square ftoet In area, ~h 1'<111dmg feature heights up to 40 feet tall) are OS$Umed mfill between the large fonnat tenants, wrth pmnary pedestnan entrance$ hlong inward or directed toward Parle Avenue. Again, parlong IS assumed to be concentrated w,thm eadl segment of the site, to allow for potential •seu,nd·generatton• redeVelopment at higher densrt1es, 1f achievable. The northwest quadront of tile Jl'Ol)fflY ,s ,clentlfled as one potential location for a mid-to hlgh-riSO developmen~ whidl could take the form of a multl·level podium , parking structute, with murtrfam1ly resadenttal or office uses .x>ve. Thas ultnnate development could m1t1ate the truly urban Vtt,tOO for the area and, together w,U, peciestnao scale treatments at the comer or Parle and Logan, would tdent1fy L11s as the •gateway• to the Urban~Center North. Sm.all, specialty retatl shops and ameruttes would be concennted pnmanty along Paik Avenue. The scale of development Is more 1nbmate here, with an edectte mix of uses, arctutectural styles and gathering places In some mstaoces, Single story ret.3'11 uses may be topped with one to three: levels of apartments or professional office uses, all overlooking Park Avenue ond tile •c!iVlty along the street edge. T09ether1 the large-and mechum-format users total approx,matety 450,000 square feet of space; the smaller shop space totals approxnnatety 110,000 square feet, or 20% of the center. ·" .· \ CONCEPTUAL URBAN RETAIL PLAN CONCEPTUAL PLANNING DIAGRAM .. -...... FUUER ·SEARS ~BEING ·--·-··-----~ ARCHITECTS Hierarchy of Stteets Key to the successful development of the property 1s the reconfiguration and improvement of Park Avenue to serve as a cntical pedestrian-oriented street In the proiect. To accommodate full redevelopment of the Renton Plant properties, the ultunate build out of Park Avenue will need to allow for four travel lanes and a center turn lane, designed for vehicular travel up to 35 miles per hour. To support the v,sloo for the development of an urban retail center In this locatlOn, a generous s1d,;walk with street trees and on-street parking for Park Avenue 1s being proposed to enhance the environment m the pt.!bhc realm and encourage people tc, make Park Avenue a pedestrian street. An 1llu~trative street section for Park Avenue can be found on the follow,ng page. The other major north-sooth connection 1s Logan Avenue, ~h1ch extends from 6"' Avenue to the south and ioons Park Avenue m the north. The construction of Logan, pro·,od,ng direct a<:cess lo 1·405, will be an important alternative through connection to ensure Park Avenue functions as a pedestnan-onented shopping &treet. At the outset of redevelopment m the area, Logan is envisioned as II three-lani, street, with one travel lane m each dorectton and a center-tum lane. Ultimately, Logan w,11 expand and function eveo more so <1S a higher-speed altenal. The east·west arterial roadways, 10"' and 8"' Avenues, are less critical to the successful development of the urban retail center, other than serving as access pomts to the center off of Park Ave!\ue. Connections from 10"' and 8"' to Logan Avenue, if constructed, would be favorable, but the center would function as well with a~""Cess only off of Park, the exi,;tlng l~g of 8111 and Garden Avenues. Urban Center-North Vision and Pollcles This proposed Conceptual Urban Retail Plan meets many Of the City's vlSIOn and poltcy statements for the Urban Center-North, which call tor "retail integrated Into pedestrian-onented shopping dlstncts• and recognizes that: "At the beginning of tills transiuon, uses such as retail .. may be viable wlthOOt the office and residential components that ulam11tely will contribute to the urban Character of the d1str1ct.• The City's v1s1on plans for the tnlnsitJOII of the area over a 30-year horizon and anticipates that redevelopment win need to address the potential for future infill to allow areas to further grow to urban denstt1es. This site IS localed within District l, where the City K1ent1fles its fll'St objective as follows· "Create a maJor commerclal/reta1I d1stnct developed with uses that add significantly to Renton's retail tax base, provide add1t1onal employment opportun1t1es wrthm the City, attract IJ~sinesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering place w1tl11n the commumty."' Boein9's Conceptual Urhan Retail Plan seeks to both allow tor the near-tern, redevelopment of Boeing's underut1ilzed assets while advocating for a mix of uses that rmproves the City's tax and employment base. As IS illustrated within the att~ched economic benefit analysis, more than 1,300 JObs would be created in t~e City ~f Renton by a redevelopment of this scale The Qty would collect more than $1. 2 01,lhon m one-time revenues during development and the Oty woold receive over $1.5 m1l11on m annually recumng tax revenues at full budd out. "\·-~ -· -·1 . ---·· ' ~ .. <::,, \. ' ~· Summary Bocmg believes that Its Conceptual Urban Retail Plan lllustrates the optnnal development plan for this 45 to 47 acres of land 111 North Renton. Tile Plan offers the op1>0rturnty to contnbute to the tra11s,t1on of the area from a pnmanly lndustnal neighborflood to a higher mtens,ty ilnd range of Viable uses, prov1d1ng both jobs and a s,grnficant source of new revenue to support the City's objectives for the area. Summary City of Renton Economic Benefits SUMMARY CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS Retail Redevelopment on Part of Boeing If Renton Plant Site Economic benefits to the City of Renton of re-developing 46 acres of the Boeing Renhm, Washington plant site follow Derivation of these benefit estunatcs 1s based on a set of reahsllc assumptions that correspond to development of 451,000 square foci of retail big/medium box space and I I 0,000 square feet of retail shop space. )> At full absorption of the above 561,000 square feet of reratl space on a redeveloped portion of the Boeing Renton plant site, 1t 1s estimated that 2,197 pennancnt Jobs would be created throughout the region. )> Of this total, a projected I, 132 direct jobs would be created at the targeted 46- acre Boeing Renton site plus 266 additional indirect jobs w1thm the City of Renton, assuming a 25 percent capture rate. ;;.. It 1s estimated that these 1,398 direct and mdirect Jobs m the City of Renton would generate an additional $45.4 million in recurring annual income earned inside the City once full occupancy of this new retali space occurs at the Boeing Renton plant site >" The corresponding rncreas,• in property values by redeveloping this 46-acre portion of the Renton Boeing site into retail uses is forr,east to total nearly $66 million upon completmn in 2009 l> The increase in a1111ua//y recurring tax revem1es to the City of Renton at full build-out 1s estimated at over SJ .5 million starting in 2009. }> This is m addition to over S 1.2 million in one-time City revenues collected during land redevelopment and lhe constructionof561,000 square feet of retail space on a part of the Boemg Renton plant site during the 2004-2008 period l l/!]1(1] ~&U. F.STATF, ECON<J/tlfCS The cb• 1 u1d C-lli.;.datlOM pm:nted hcrt1t1 while ool f\llr..l'lt«d. 6n: ubt.uried from SOW'Ql!'I dNnMI rthablc! 1 ·-· -------·· ----... ----. ·------~------------~ PERMANENT JOBS CREA TED IN 2009 ______ _cJI'( QEBJ;NTON l 1800 • ·---- 1398 1200 ,-·-·- ] I ~ I lt ,oo 1 ·---· ----------- -l I .coot' - 0 --- 0 --.. ---,--- With Project Wtthout Protect NEW JOB ANNUAL INCOMECREATED IN 2009 $50.0 5 $40.0 g $30.0 0 --.. ---__c1rv OF RENTON ___ _ ----·····-·---------····-- !1 $_20.0 t----- .2 j $10.0 0 $0.0 'Nltll Project Without Pro)ect 11 90< _____ _!,!EW _CITY Of RENTON TAX REVE~y_e_s ____ _ f ":'°° F-----· _____ · ---------===-- ! "• r ·------- 0 ' 0 $1.:tOCl r---·---·-···· ------.,.. 0 11,000 -------------.. -g SfO(i +-----~------·- : $600 ·~--:, i ~00 ----·· t-S200 t---. I ID , 2003 >ON JOO> 2006 2007 200t -2'1D :!011 2012 2013 ~ .. ~~d--Dev._ _ • Building Dev. • Permanent Taxn CURRENT WNINO Sce4ARIO /IE,11. ESTATE" ECONOMICS :;.;,.---'-·"-- 4noomc • maom Pl'OJJertr M8IM:I vaei,e,. "1IOM Selected 6&ilte RfWfflLln. lrilklM • • • 2.197 .. 97 74 $ 10-47 S I ' NEW PERM/I.NF.NT JOOS CREATED BY 2009 1,SOO '·""' '·""' ,---------- NEW JOB ANNUAL INCOME IN 200t ... '" "' Ii' ~ ... a 9' ;/; ... j ... • Ill •· ·-~U,W,., ~ P..F,,t"' IIJlWJ , ............ ,.....,....,,.," ___ ..... ~,.. .. -C(ll_ .. _...»,f_l~I!;,"''~ 3115 114 ·---·-----------·----- PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES BY 2009 W7 " ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ Oolars In mll+on& NEW JOB CREATION , ... ____ _ -----,·~----------- '"' ---···~-----------! ·-1---·· -------- ..... ... ~ .. \,IIMll'Al.p,~-· llrlxrl ----------· -i!'Lond~ • ..;-,...., .. , Cl--] __ .,..9¥..__..... .... ,.,_ ............... _~-~--~-""~ 1----: .. ~-----_·-_· ___ N_EW_ STATE TAX REVENUES .... - 11"11 •· ~U.-Yila?<P·-F\Ol~I IU,;\0,31 .,__....,.._._,,,L.._4-1_...J., ----------~· ~~;;ewtdlftg Oov T•~n ~!SAMII TUH I NEW RECURRING STATE REVENUES 110,1111 •· .. .. .. .. ... ,,....., _ _._,..,.,... ___ ,..,.._.. ______ l_~ .. "lti,t,tt "' Assump1Klfl8 rn-v~LoPMENf AS.SUMPTIONS• vi\Lu~ SOlJRCt 11.-~ntLond T Olal oo<<labie rudovelopmenl i.r,d lfoa-"not" ocres •588 IIOarUalld Toi.al bulldable mdovoloprncnt land an-ea-"ner !lq h 1.989.~ Hear11ond land O.vef.oipmfflt Land 00'\'ek>PM(!llt Coos11\1ch0n Col\l $ 14,314,177 1"""11and land ~nt conslructlon dUrat,on • yea11ii 1 0 REt:J Hoa~,'ld Pllfoont de$~Jn l. maoegem801 100% REE PerC4flt CON.truct,on labor 380'/I REE Pefo,n1 matonals 540% REE Butld<ng o.,,.fopfflont ,_.,.. Change m 8!'.se"'"....$ed value $ 65.996.257 From AV 0$llma!es Pe=nl-,gn and mano-t-100% REE Perccol construthon labof' -~ S60% ~e Percent conHUctlein ntatenols & seMCOS • commercl8I 540% REE 8'"'119 """""'"' tor deo,gn atld manaoemcnl 26 REE 841mg multpliM for COO$t(u(;iaon 20 REE Propofly development du,al,on • yeors 40 -.nd Ret.,,1-8ig,1,kd - GroH s.qoaru feet ot retu ipace 451,000 -Load faciol··rel~ ~ 5% -8,uildtng con:itiv,;,hon GO$t /s.q ft -R:Wtl spaoa $ 120 Heartland Sq ft per employee-big boK "'4• 600 REE Rela<I ,;alo$ p« sq ft -bog i,,,. .., .. 275 REE Rebll-5hop Space G,oss sqoaru feo» ot r1ttall 1paco 110.000 t!UrUand ~cad tociol--• •f,OCO 51', Heartland """"1ng -<O>l /liq ft -telaol "*"' $ 130 -S<! ft per empo)'OO -5hop Space 250 REE --l!!!!'!!lft. s 2.'iO Ull&REE ECONOMIC M,\JIIPTIOltS Ind,""' Jobs M"",p!,o< let '"""""II JObs 1941 REE -,ot,, mulople,"" 11<-.1 <lo,dopment c:onslruci>On Job$ 2483 REE -..ct ,ot,o m1rp1«1or ~ con&1rlJd10o ioos 2667 REE Sllare ol ,nd,roci Job$ capWr,d by Renton 25% REE Sllil<e ot '"<Ii"'°' lnoome ca;m,red by Ren""1 25% Rf.E K,ngCo ....... -FTE-fo<d•eclr«Um11(1tOtallJ(lbson-llM . $30.000 ESO&REE ~Co ewrago•nnualwagolord-)Obs $43,000 ESO&REE K"'9 Co amago aonuol-let pq«;l dKlgo/rlla._mont $65,000 REE Average annual wage for ono-'1ne COMWC'tlon ,obs $49,000 REE ~ re~ts EM emdO~ee ~ aY8f1I08 TAX BASE ANP REVl!l)!UE ASllUlill'l'lOIIS t111000 WDR&ESD Improved laM es %ot lolol --ol redovoloptd pc,)pOt1y 300% REE RNI estate lul'MYtf' ralo 100% REE Total r-se$Sed value ot •e:osllAO• ntuM p,ope,fyland ' 16,548,400 HeOt118nd Total as~es1ed \•ak,t of "exi..1,-,.• -·•• ·-s 15198""" Hea"" .. nd Rentun l.ht>.;mWl"]le·P-flN l(I, 11/13'03 The UY A.W utW.i>Ql'I:. J)(O:l.,,led ho,oa, ~f'(III gu:tr:lr.llt()d, N\'11 been dltllrwd ~ tcUU,a ~ bN ~ Pr,ge\ REAL ESTA1E' ECOIIOl«CS Summary One-time I.and One-time Budding Recurring Devel-en! De 12:00S-2008 ln2009 - JOBS Dtred Jobs 61 73 1,132 Indirect Jobs 91 122 1065 Total Jobs 153 196 2.197 INCOME D•oct Income $ 3,149,119 $ 15,052,400 $ 33,962,500 tndired Income $ 3.922.789 ~ 21.034.316 $ 45.807.488 Total lncom1, $ 7,071,906 $ 36,086,716 $ 79,769,988 PROPERlY VALUE INCREASES Not appl,cable Notappl-i 65,996,257 TAX BASE INCREASE.S Assessed Valuaboo Nol appllC8bte Nol appbcable $ 65,996,257 Rela!I Sales $ 12,882,759 $ 61,S78,000 $ 143,946,750 Real Est.«e Salos Nol appl,cabte $ 97,742,657 $ 6,599,626 Gross Busioess Roce,pts $ 14,314,177 $ 68A20,000 $ 143,948,750 SE\..ECTED T AA REVENUE INCREASES (Proporty, sales, B&O and real estate) State Taxes $ 1,169,652 $ 5,143,45'1 $ 10,356,7l9 Local Taxes City or Renton-property 100% m CIC)' $ 245,167 $ 959,786 $ 1,554,562 Kina CoUJ1 .. 0%,nonuntv $ 17,392 $ 83,130 $ 95,695 ~ Urblin V4>;ic-P-F1N XI, 1 Tlt3'00 1 fM $ILi. ..:I c.akulal<OIU f"*Mfl~ ~ 'flMt' not ~ ~..a botffl obM-lrtff loCMCM beriiw«I lo ti. tehlblo ..... REAL ESTATl:ECCWOMICS land Use Retad-8191Me,J Box Retail-Shep Space TOTAL Not Sqfl 428,450 104,500 532,950 6USll1eSS Rerotpts Retail Salos -· pe".!9!! Rota1IS1les $ :!75 s 117,823,750 $ 2ll<J $ 26,125,000 $143948750 Annual h'!?.X"'""' G'°"o receipts 714 $ t 17,623,750 ~18 $ 26,125,000 1132 $143,9-l{j,750 Renton Urb¥I Vilagc.P-FIN.)J, 11f13tOJ Page 1 Th9 data n calcldak'l"'d prflffllld ~~ -.Me-oo1 gua,~ havt-bNn -clun.d from'°'""'°"~ lobenKlilble REAL ESTATE fC~S On&-tnne ti'lrougl1 Olle-bmC BUlldlr,g LandOewl nl ment 2005 lhni 2008 aC2009 Assessed ValUatJOn $ 65,9(,6, 257 Real Eslale Hak•s $29,322,857 $ 97,742,657 s 6,599.626 Rotiffl S,,les $ 12,882,759 $ 61,€76,000 $ 143,948,750 Gross Bus11mss Rece1pls s 14,314,177 $ 68,420,000 $ 143,948,750 Rcnlon\kb3nV~·P••ft,IIU.1'lf13,U3 TN 4¥1 9114 (21Q#JOl'fl ~Mf*n ¥thi.not"'1~.111tCOC, h,i\'I) *ro~ fmmtc!QfClnbelol'Yedfl:1be rellabkt Page 1 REAL ESTA TE ECONOMJCS Bldg. Slat1 Year 2005 ASSESSED VALUATION ByL.aJtdU.e Ret.N~BqMc<Bo, Relaf--Shop Si>acc SUBTOTAi. Less cm1,og :and vahJOt>co GfQSt SgFt ,s1.ooo 110,000 less l!'XtibAQ fflS)l1)V8fflBn ~ TOTAi. lNCREASl:S 561,000 RMIOO Urban V1 t;tgc-P-FINJd. 11113/03 const COMlnlclton COtt /Sg Ft V-/Sq ft $ 12? ()I) $54,120.000 $ 130 00 ..... -~s':1•,..300,ti . ..,ooo;;;.- $ 611,ffi>,OOO ll>c! o~ !11'('1 ~inofl• ~1-dlto~._,,."""""'~ ~be.•10W.-..thmMIUfCOlbo""""'4tot,.a r~ $23,194,288 $6.123.511 $29,322,857 $ i'oiii New AV $77,314,286 $20,428.071 $91,1,2,857 ($16,5"MOO) ($15.198.200) 65900.257 Pa90l Rl!AL ~STAJ'li ecOHOIIICS Crmmercial kl s tart B IQ. Y 2005 ear New SqFt Per ""' Gross Land Use Jobs/EmnlO"i!£$ Emolovff SQII Sc,tt Re1ac1-e,g1Me<1 Box 714 600 428,450 451,000 Relad S""" Sn=~ 418 250 104 500 110000 TOTALS 1,132 5:crJ 950 561,000 I Renton Uit>an \fit .agc.P-flN xi, 11113/03 Pag:& 1 Tl'C d.tt.:I .:ind cab.A~'$. pt«.t'ftlcd ha rein wtuic ~ gv:x.lfl\ced, hiivo l,ccn oMiPl'Cd ftom 1i0Ult:tl ~ to, b9tt~abJo .REAL ESTATE ECONOIIIICS Ooellme Jobs From De>eto,,ment From Deve/opm<>nt llem Ofl.Bnd Of Bu1/dµ,,,• PROFESSIONAL JOBS Oes,gn end management cosls $ 1,431,418 $ s.e12.ooo Avemge sala,y $ 65,000 $ 65,000 S.llfl!I mulbpl,er 25 25 ProtesslOllal )Ob years 9 42 T<•tal profeSSIOllal wages $ 572,567 $ 2,736,800 Annual professional wages $ 572,567 $ 664,200 P1o,ec:t dural\On in years 1 4 Prnlessiooal jOb6 created 9 11 CONSTRUCTION JOBS Cons1Nc:troo labor cosls only $ 5,153,104 $ 24,631,200 Average salary $49,000 $49,000 Bd 1mg mu1t,p11er 20 20 t:onstiuct10n )Ob years 53 251 Total conslructlOll wages $ 2,576,552 $ 12,315,600 Amual constructron wages $ 2,576,552 \: 3,078,900 PrOj<'cl duration 111 yea;s 1 4 Coostruc:tlOll Jobs c:n,ated 53 63 Total Equivalent New Jobs 61 73 Annual Wago Income for New Jobs 3,149,119 3,763,100 Total Waae Income for New Joba $ 3.149.119 $ 15,052.400 Re~~ Urban Vtllag+-P-FJl'h:1, 11113'03 P.-go 1 Tho~\il ilWld ~t\111111()(\1Pf*$tnladht~ ~ not pr~ed. M~ °'"m~fromMMON ~tobeh!IM!)le REAL ES1ATE ECONOMCS WASUI~ l..ltnd Dtv B1M1d1na Dtt 2002Tu laAdOev 8wletfng0ev ~~ f!M'nlJfl ~nod ru:eue Tulluo .... ·-R.....,.. R,vflUlt5 Sale1, T.1J1. s 12,832,759 s 61,578,000 • oo,\ 1000% $753,G41 I 3,802,313 e&or-,.~ s 1-i,3,4,,n $ 6$,4:W,OOO 0471% 10 OO'J, U0,878 s 290!)32 ~al uuue T.-a.n1-i.r s 29322~7 s 97 74( 157 1 ffll, 000% $375,3)3 s 1 251,100 TOTAL $1,189,652 s 5,143,454 kinQCounty LandDn BulldlllQ! Oh' 2t02Tu; Land o,v --· .£ne .. ""' rennues ht...odTu:B.-r .. s--L·---......... -.r .. 1 12,862,759 s 81,!.iltl,IIOO 01511 10000. $17,392 $ 83,130 l&OTu s 1,1,,314,171 s 88,420.000 000'!, 1000'0 so $ . Roal Est* Tr.ini!ier s 29 322 ac.7 s 97.742457 0""" ,<)01' so s TOTAL SH.392 $ 83130 City of R•lon Land 0.. lhdtd'111 Dtv 200lTox 1.#dllev. -... Doy OM bfflc l'n'MlU115 J'mod Tu Ian r .. 11uo ~----· ..... ...... --· -... Sale& 16" $ 12,182,759 $ 61.578.000 0 .. ,. 10 O<II' $98.!153 I 471,072 8&0T.u s 14.314,tn $ 68.420.000 000% 10001' so I ~t E.&lakl Tr.1,l'sb $ 29322&57 • 977,4 ...... 7 0!\0% 0,.,,. 114fHii14 $ 418.7141 -TOTAi. $245,167 s 959,736 Rmton U~ V.lla,~P-FlN~. t111JI03 n., ,sa~ ~ u,1wta1,~ t-.fff•l'6edfl,a,.n wh,~ not~. r-. ~11~ hffl SOUf'ClaS ~ lo bo rellabMi ..... REAL. £Sf~ TE ECONOIMCS Rucumng Revenue • WA Stale 200, 2002-11111 2009 R..-_ilrtwVI reYeffllH luB&s• TuRatl -PrOQeffl T..-.: $1,5,996,257 $3SOOO '2'17,587 Salo$ Tu $1"13.946.750 6-$9,3Sll,669 8&0Tax• SM3,946,750 0471'11 $677,999 11ea1 E01a!e T"""1er $e,599,82i! 1 28'11o 1114475 TOTAL $10 356.729 Kir'9C~ :t009 2012 20H Rac:u....-revenua TIX8t:H Ta.Raia -· Propo<tyTOJ! $115,996.257 ,,.~ $95,695 SJ!etlaii; $0 , 00'1, SD 6&0TOA so 000'1, so Real Estain Tromf« so 060% so TOTAL $95.695 CNyof-2009 2002 2009 ..... .-Tax Bao Tuftalo -Property Tax $ll5,996.2S7 $33500 '221,087 SalesTax $1'13,948.750 0 85'11 $1,223.58< 8&0TII.X $1'13,'148,750 C.00% so Reel EIIMe Trat1Jfe.-$6,699.626 050'11 $32,998 Head ToJ/Y, 1.398 $5500 ~76912 TOTAL $1,564,562 Renlon Urban V1Hage--P-FIN x~ 1111~3 Pago 1 TIit" !Ulta :;w1d ea:o;ll.lhcMsir~c1 h11,m while no1 ~ararj~ haw, ticcoobtalMCffrl)lll S,(IUf'CtSbdliwdto ti.rehable R£41. ESTATE ECONOMICS S0eln11 CPA• Estimated CootforWater lnfrastrucoture Improvements 10/16103 Phase 1 Location from To 1 Park Ave N. Garden Ave N N. 8th St 2 N. 8th Sl extension Park Ave N Logan Ave N. 3 Logan Ave N. N. 8th St. N 6th Sl 1 • Pressure reducing 4 station at West Hill Pump 5 N. 10th Sl ParkAveN. Garden Ave N . subtotal 1 ~ 4 Phase 2 6 L.ogan Ave N. Garden Ave N. N. 8th St 7 N. 10th St Houser Way Garden Ave N. 8 N. 10th St Park Ave N Logan Ave N. 2 -Pressure reouc1~g .. 9 stations at Highlands 3-200 ft water stubs to 10 properties west of Logan Subtotal 6 to 10 !Total 1 to 10 Future Reservoir in Kennyda/e 320-zone .,,. Note: Cost without L.ength Cost with street street restoration In ft. re,storatlon .. . 2000 $ 500,000 $ 459,500 1300 $ 325,000 $ 298,675 1300 $ 325,000 $ 298,675 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 650 $ 162,500 $ 149,338 $ 1,512,500 $ 1,406,188 2700 $ 675,000 $ 620,325 900 $ 225,000 $ 206,775 950 $ 237,500 $ 218,263 $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 600 $ 150,000 $ 137,850 $ 1,487,500 $ 1,383,213 $ 3,000,000 $ 2.1ss,400 1 $ !5, 000, 000 $ 5,000,000 Ccst exe!udlng ~trect patch;ng fo:-e ft wide x 6" ~h;ck as.,n~:t .:atch ovei water !in.a trerich i'iithir1 streets where new water lines will be installed. Asphalt cost estimated at $90/ton II AbdouUooe,ng.'boelng-,nfrastructure-coot-~t 01.xls-1016103 Exhibit 6A . . Exhibit 6?.> MAXIMUM AVAIL,A.llLE FIRE FLOW ~ WITH NEW WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS IS 5 600 CAI LONS .PER MIIWTE. . r., R< . • ""'""" '"'1) . \!,/ J«i,.,GM \?.I ~ ,. IWOI M,1,91 I~ (ll,.I! ti!!\.UOKI ~)~~@~,.'M1tftw.lt~~ '// ) /~ I I I I l ® _,, 0 V > ..; 0 0 () ,, -< ' " cu 1:J- 4lh SI \ ... ., ,. PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR eOEING CPA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -- -----------·- I D ----·----· ----- "l X I - I l,J ", I~ ; DO CJ • if * eoem; Corn,. ,&an .t.m.ndmtJnt ToW eu.:dc.it (0~ 8) Sicrmw.i.er Sy.i.m ifflpfOtttmtntl ~ ltom Se-~nt 1mnro.....Tl\a.nb 1 BOC IJQtln't Cteak 10 N 10tt'I SU 12" lltenll 2 soc 1N ,ou, sr 10 t-J3th Su Ne.i,24'"& 12"'iattJt•I~ 3 soc ,Nau, .st to N 6Ch S11 New2•· ,l 12• IJterals • P.a.1\A\"'ON ~IWWA:GSO~ Nt11111 1.2" & 1:C-iaWl'III, • Park A"' N aocto H 1ocn 1:z•JN • Part Ave N 1oth:1>1tON.fa,~ 12" , ... ' fladc AwN N ettt SI ION 1T • Pad: Ave N N8tl'ISHoN~lh 12"-• N 10ih st 'IO?a'1CAYI NJ New 11· & 12"' la\fl'Q. 10 N 1011, S!in AWN ,a Go,den A ... M Ntw 11· & 12".,.,... 11 N10th.S1 AwtN1ol-al05' ,.._. ,r & ,r111en1s 12 N 84h SI IO rate AW HI Nfw1..--A 1:"°IJCel'IJI 13 N 111'1 st Palk Ave N 10 Gr!Sen A\/0,.,,, 12· ' ,. NllhS1 A\lltN10~1 New,r & 12" )11,aralf, .. N m St c.c111, P.lwr to ID 16 N~hSt tc Pd:Aw N\ IZ9 IO 30- ..1l.._ .Qut1'aU 410 ftaM ,~~ . ~110,e· •BOC••-ol Charnpk>ns (I.-Avo) • ....._ROWOO'JI_....,., Hl'.4-- • Asstlffl5d ~ mcl:udt permlnr'I;. ~. dellgn, male:Nt,,, coneb'l.don, md npeQl,On Of*· c:ha,, bac*fl, n: • AuuiM ful ctot~ on Ill ltrHII ROW l.tna1h 1fl) 18<)0 ~ !"° 1'00 1.200 .,. ... 1 ... 03• t.C115 ,. ea. 1250 Tott! 1e:,68!i To111 Tot•! ROW i..er'IQ:thof W.,.,Q~ -..... ,5") Lateral& 11'r\ fal"MN• ~ I :ie.oeoo 1.1113 2 S2'10,63 ' 1ij~ :"CO ; S146.$i~ I 1HI 1,079, 1 1180 3~ 1:-S.~ '10 7 $117 35& =~1 ,.,. 2 ,73> . ., 2 '"' 135 741 2 1123.;"4- 87.t 2 '81.,., .910 1 1 573,561 ., .. " f 3 S54 17& .. • $30•1 1DI ... 1 $91177 ~ .... .,, ' s7;,.178, 120 sao ~ __!1~~1 1,1$5.260 11,Qi,4 $1,480,000 Cod wJ Ccat -'out Diameter("'] ~ilQ!!on (!,!~~ (SM) 12 1H 155 18 215 190 24 250 220 30 4()0 3M 38 550 510 '4! 700 SS5 Exhibit 7C llem 1 2 • t 5 • 7 • j ."!.1 12 13 .. Bo.Ing Comp Plan "'-ndm•ni Ph,... Ji St~.-1 .... s11-.m 1mprcvemen1s ~ OPtion e SIOm> __ ---1.!!!.2!.0_11111'Jlen~ ,2~1ifit1is, 12· ...... 12"1&ff New 1~ 1"2" &a1tra11i ,riitirill 1Fi.1itru ,_. ,r i 1F tiiiii1i u'Tirliiiiiij" New 18' i 12" '.ale ... , .. ....,... "'-"•°'L'°T",...=::-,:- ~la3"_ Tc111 ROW lo s1lJ.l~ ~--_ ----r----=-=.__S 123 ,Si4 ll.1.2.llJ s i I • I ~ 1 I 7 'ot.,j Exhibit 78 ..... :a ·- ,; " g ~~~ii~ _ij---0 ! l l ./ ' , \ r~--_,-------', I 2. 5~ LF OF 12' I ~ $250 Pi;R T I 1. 5-200' STUBS ~ I TOTAL ,"$125,000 i FROM LOGAN \ \/ I TOTHEWEST ', \ , AT $20,000 EAOl \ ', · TOTAL• $100,000 ~\ I / /P \ ~v r •1 I /; '.\/-" I .. ~{ 7 ,, /'/ / ;'>"/e· ' ' , // /·(Y~~ . / / . ' 3. 100 LF OF 12" /;., .. ,. @l $250 PER FOOT TOTAL = $250,000 i"-._ EXISllNG KING CO. , .,._, EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR ' 4. 1200 LF OF 12" 1 · @ $250 PER FOOT ' TOTAL = $300,000 /r ' 0 ' ' I ,.., ~I~ ~ I li • ,,. \ \·. . \\ I \'-. s. 1300 LF t,o 'R.PLA EX. a• WIT~ IIEW 12 (AND LO"i_Ef!.~-E) @ $300 PtK T (EX. CONC. 'MA ) 1 TOTAL= $Jo1i;000 . ....... ,, ' " ,"' I .... , I •+ I ~ , I .. ozn m L:..:IML-i _-_L___.LJ--""--"-'--'-',,.,,._, _ __,.,,._',_.,_• _ _JU,,. ,. r TOTAL COST ,' 1. WEST ST1J8S = 100,000 2. LOGAN/PAAK CONNecrc>R • 125,000 3, N, !Olli •,LOGAN lO PAAI< • 250,000 4. N. 8TH -LOGAN TO PARK a 300,000 5. GARDEN REPlACEMENT • 390.000 $1,165,000 OR $1.2 MIWON ' PROPOSED BOEING CPA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SEWER EXTENSIONS EXHIBIT 8 Cl H ji(~ ~ • i I ~ .. ·I r i ' ·e•jf f·!'ft !j , I f • h ! !11 pn 11 '! i·· 1'11!1 1i! I ' i II' { ~ i H J1 ! :p { .. ,, , Jf L :,: ''' ',·. 1 up I • • i l f It I I I I 01 I i f Li! l ' J II \ f' 1:1'1 f I ' j 1 .. ' I I I I Hi i . i""i Jii I .J • I Ii i r f J " ' I I ~ 11 I I I I i ! i n·· <i!) " ., _J_ r r 1Wll '..,,..,_..~·-----·IIG.oct•l'll>I-_ ,.4,/1111- \ ; ,( :._ \ ' ' c==:i =::=" .. !I; -=::=:,"19 @ -- t ---© ----- lmfll--··----_ .. __ ___ ... __ ·--PROPOSED ARTERIAL RIGHTS OF WAY TO SUPPORT DISTRICT 1 EXHIBIT 10 'I TYPICAL SECTION 1: PARK _AVENUE NORTH FROM PROl'OSEO LOGAN AVENUE TO NORTH 8TH STREET EXHIBIT 10A 4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE 0 ~-----------. .:.f"or~vr------------, 1------·-tJa'TNJ aooo-,------< ,,_ -.1i·~~-..! ,~·~ !"Y.:--t-"r"~ ·~ 1l_1rw1 Jilt: I .----,.-.==·----r ,r 1--~ ..... -~ ...... ,,:..~ ~~ ""' ..... _,,, - ........... ~ .. 1..s-ea.om • ... -· "' ..,.,. •'111' "'11..n!U, ~ 1.6' SCAL£· 1"'•1e: !:,/Q1c; 3.2' PARTIAL BUILDOUT (SAME AS FULL BUILDOUT) SECTIONS ARE ORA.WN IN A~ WITH TH: KING COUffY ROAD ST,tJCJAFO$ AMJ TH: CJTY OF AfNTCi'I SmEET ST AMJAAOS. ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE IU.lJSTP.,t,TMf. k ff C<:>nsu!tirlfl EnQ!,-5 ,,, stewarl s~-Suite 800 Sftltlo. l'/aStl!'laloo 9801 Cl!06! 382-0BCO Fsx /206! 382-0500 () IOVEM38'1 2003 I i \ TYPICAL SECTION 2: PARK AVENUE SOUTH FROM NORTH 8TK STREET TO NORTH 8TH 8TREET EXHIBIT 108 4 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE 0 ~---------------"~~ ;..~ ... ---------------, !'~~~.!-----------~ .;J:1.,~-4-~ • ~ I ,-.. u.c :..LI OlftW ,,__.,1"01C ~ ,,,., ...... --~ .-~.;~~~~'t=~H ' 'F-L!-l " ....... , --..:.:;.J_..i:,.___, 1-,-l ..... !,MC ,~J "IMIS •'If CIU,T[S .. ~ I V1llntt .r llilDl'I ~ """' ~·-----------""""--' ~· 1fi' SCAU: 1"•16' tDIE! 3_2' PARTIAL BUILDOUT (SAME AS FULL BUILOOUT) SECTIONS APE alA lffl IN ACCOROAN::,E WITH TI-E Km ccu,rry ~ ST,WW,OS HO 7rE CITY OF Rf.NTCl'I STREEi ST~ ALL ROADWAY SECTIONS AAE IU.USTRATI\£ C<x>sufllrg Eil//"-S -or SleWlfl S!reet SV/le 800 se.111e. W85/Jinpll:r) 98()1 tro6l ~ Fex C'Q6l 382-0500 r) NOVEM!EFI 2003 TYPICAL SECTION 3: LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 2 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A TURNING LAN£ \.f,'i" ,1,·. ,\:-· l .· ... ~t· r -"i~j .:,,.-: , ~~'!-J', .:_. :,~·-.... ,.i-~ .. ·-:-,_.,;, • 1:.::,-. • ~ ... ~.:-::: 'v.: " ,I 1 1 i ~.!_- -.' :~ EXHIBIT 10C I ,,. 1r\,,\·w I VIIC: ~ !Iii.I) -~ ~--~· __ _!_J .... -.... 'f'lllta·,-~~1 I 1'Q ~ •,-:,;I I . • "' -",.. m -.=:.=-:-'""'" l PARTIAL BUILDOUT TO SUPPORT SUBDISTRICT 1A 0 i' 16' I ' J2' j SCAL!: 1"•1&' ~ SECTIONS ARE D'!AMI IN ACCOFlON¥:;I; WllH TI-£ KING ca.NTY RO.O{) ST AfCA/10$ ,t/D 71£ CITY OF FENTa. STREET STAMJAFrJS. ALL ROAOWAY SECTIONS Af'E IWJS11'!ATM --· Ga!suftmg BlQ"'6e<s 101 s'6"-, -e $Jlt8 soo -1!16. _,g(Q, (16()1 '206) 3B2-0600 Fax C:'06! 382-0SOO JO /1\:)YSl,BER 2003 TYPICAL SECTION 5: NORTH 8TH STREET 2 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEOIAN/TURNINO LANE 0 l t 10' I J2' ! i ljk · .. f.;'·' -~·· ~-·,;:l -' ~.~ ' ·-,, 11 ) ' ,---,--~ ~-..:: -= -=:::. = ~· . ---- 1 I r l ':z:/' lj:..-1 -...... »~ -~oJ..i~ . 4$..~-=-~·---- ~--------------n -.it"., PARTIAL BUILDOUT TO SUPPORT SUBDISTRICT 18 SCA.Lt 1·-us· WI£: stiCT,O,,,S A.l'1E DRAl'N "' AC(X)Fl)l,NCE WITH Tl-€ KIN) C0.NTY F!OAt' STNCAROS ND 11-iE CITY OF ff!!ITON STFlfiET STAID/OFDS. AU ROADWAY SECTIONS Af'E IUUSTRATI\IE EXHIBIT 10D - Consult//lg En/)/n9ers (!; Stfflrt SVoet SU/to 800 Snttl"' W8SIJlrOIO'I 981:)1 C2061 3B2-o600 Fax (2()6) 382-0500 10 NOYS.BER 2003 JYPICAL SECTION 7: NORTH 10TH STREET 2 LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH A MEDIAN/TURNING LANE ~ l' ,e· j SCALE 1w•i6' !:am' Jt,, . \ ~.';.'{' .:~fy;~ ~,~~ 'I ,, '1 ! ! ----' :__J ----=.:... ::: -=-= I L _,.:i;,, I .,::; ...,..,: ~ $11'; 1IIICtt """' Clt•ota: ,. _.. ... ! >1.!. -"'1llllt IIIMCU. .. ~ 45,,1, ,.. ~T ~ IIIQ'flCS w,-, :n-.:i-2 --o,,tT~, .. !-----------------'l'r _,. ~ ... PARTIAL BUILOOUT TO SUPPORT SUBDISTRICT 1A 32' ! EXHIBIT 10E °"1slJltlrl!) &,g,.--s 01 Stewart Sb'Ht. 8<.'!te 800 SECT/06 ME. DAAVIN IN ACCOROAICE WITH T1-E KING co.pry ROAD STNCJAFDS AfCJ Tl£ CITY OF RENTCII sme:r STAIOARDS Seam,. ~ 98()1 AU ROADWAY SE:CTICNS AFIE IU.US1"i\ TIVE ll1(l6) 382--0600 Fex (200) 38!'·0500 l'.)M)va.&;R200.'J ' -- BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING SINDIN<J SITE PLAN N1:::1/J&S£1i4SEC 7.T2JN RSE.WM S .'11\'v' !14 8 SIN 114 S[C 8 T 23/\i. R C,F, WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DEO!CADONS· i{t'IJ ?~fi1-Jitl~::F~1~·:i~~·:::~~~.J~,:1~!1tti'{itt~;i£i11t ·~~ ~"' SA,1) ~'>IJ'~·;; >l't ~,.,, ri "[Alli: ·!>f'· [7'[f, co~,c~(•N!) '" _ACq8DANCI_ >l!T" fl'[ ~' , ~[ :Jf f'1[ Q~NlRS .,.,,,,.,~·o,, ! J ~, ex~,, ;· ,,.,c ! ! AND SJ!lj'YfYQR'S CfRilf/CAK , ,,cJ,~Y C[./",,, '"A',~-, g,NQ,NC s,,r ~IA'< (!f OX/NG LUf5-~0RC <ANLING IS B•S[D ~-"ON AN ACIJJA, susvr• '·'" _,,_,a'.•v·o ,,., '.Jc ,,::,·c~,, .1, 5 ;c,;;;.:,.~rc .'J ~~iifrl ~AN;)[: fAS', wu•~l'rf YfR,OfAN AS0 "'" 'Hi' ·.,;L'./Si:'.i ,•,D ),;,As-:c, Ml[ 'i'O"" -:o~,,t"('P,, •ecs:c,· ,_ APPROVAi S· A0Mi','1!1STRA WR OF f'OLANtil,'1G / r'"?'.;/UJING / PUBUC W;:Jr'KS 1xA,M<r., •ND A~""~"'-" ~,q ,.;w ;e ;j '00 ('! l'J.'; __ ..::;Q __ r!AY w,· ___ ]2(.<:,.f'ei..!l_ft' ------29~ ,\id_y)aM/1 f.n 41'.~\ri-?.1><1H1!VJW:(vf A·"""',s;;;,,rno. C,'Y 0, "'~"ON ' KING COUNTY OEPAR.'MC.N.' CF A$$[5S!,1[r,jT$ HHl,'NW ANV •PPPOVfC· Thi)~-OAv 01 (: 1 Q{Q,?H/}i'/'J,.)_ _ ____ WQ.':] ·_5U.i"ti __ t.,L_,--_,_Ll_c:__. __ · ___ ·!ifl..1:kfll/11 d".b.,,a,r1 u,~- K'", Wc''i'f •l~'f~SOF . u,~~·· ~ft.'C !00,1N1Y ,51c_',IO"' ,c~m,.~, N'}~.,,-., Q'EP :{:_~ _._0·c1' S:n~;.'1U1/:.f.Li/-1C; "I'~ /iC~ 1, 'ilc·,.; 4.c1,.s2 k:INC COUN ry:'flNA/;J[[ DI.WS/bN-·.Cl;_R ni-'ICA f/ON : .. " ,'·~rncar crnn,/\_,., At'._-PROI'."·~~ rues AR;~~'.o. r,A, .,.,,,. ,ii:·i;,u,.w~ut.,·1 s-~[c1Ac •~·,c,,,..cNTS C[Pfir<µ; ,o ;.-,,; ()H,r_;( C'.)P COl;t£G7,l)N ANIJ r,,;r ,Cl 5PfC/Al A~S(,$ .. £:N!.S cr~nr,,co Y!J •H:s '.)/!,Ci: ro~ ~~~,;:f-~;{~ __ rtt~:1::IiN~~~.~~?~~ft.~~·r?·N'"~~~-~c'.R~~'..li.~\~;F~M~li"5 OR f()R A~Y O•HCPI , ....... ·)1~· rx\A~ -·· r-Al11f __ ~~ _ D•Rff/0(/. -~l'C ca~N!Y .:,[,-L,'.'Y C•RCCTO>I, <rNr, W'}NT' o;-r.r:r: ~ F,NAI-/Cl ()»,c·i· .o, <f/'IA,~(F kECbRDINC. C£RVflCATf ,--,,rn roR R~C~~o A_l-·r>,£ R£~ii,sr ,:,,c '"'.-c"~ v •"~~~i:" }"'~ ,.c,'3-o.ir or:~ 2JQ...~ ;_r -'t~ 1Jr11~ri.,· ;>;_s,,~,., AND µf(;.!)f.10[~ ;,,,. ·.-r;,~~,._.,..,..Jt::_ er P • .._,, ~A·XS el""'. l?l_0 RcCOfiD:; Gf ~.'I/~ C,:,V'NrY. ,..;_,~,'%-r,;,~ ·~S~O ,.,;,·,. 11!/o.'eor:nzi/ .Bo<b•~· "~"''".',:'"" ~ac~J :·J:!~72 - a,• . ...i•-= i,,.,.,.,_.,"' ' .... ~".:''.'" ' ___ _____,c.. z.....,.,..,.,...,...,_,,..., .. ,,.,v • .,..., .. () C) C) gN[RA, e8o.JEtr orSCRrenoN· w&,:;·p,ic,nc :~~{;ii:~t;;, i;;)~.,..,A~<WAY m,o,.'r. (•?-~) q~r-<ew ,' · 'ic"A>Y ,No:_,5rq1;l (':',) HORIZONTAi DAl'JJM.'.. .. r.~1,1.,1f.,·,, '"'"·"'"' l<t~C ~9:i"O .'/J "frn <M< '~'VA~v MOAOc"ll,.,!.N r i ~<l'l'V('1 C ~ rn,.,iJc!: ,>o:, ~-~, ~.,o ,r,c, r.-ir,· ~,p,:,1,s ·'-"l. mf~ ;oi,nAil'.J ,~ A'1,0 ,o .. ,.,S'[:J ,,.-1.,.,1• A !.iJS'ifY ~·,,ro•r;"i) Dl,S[tiN(" w'H',S '"l ,,,,., Yf48 :o,c:)R"~ r~ UC JJ,t.;JD-lQ) ,.,, 3J2 lJO· 13) CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROi · •.n m c,r, or qi"()!, S,'R11:">" co,,mm '1f'WC~K "I.W~·1.,1,Nrs = PL·~s~.t/JC ro r.,, C[R',/5 a,-,,..~ li<\IUOf'"["' A(;~r;n,rtir ("0[V£(0P"t/J1 AG'liff"f~T",' CAi[9 D1;C("8£A '• lOOJ, e[Tl<!:H.' "'' Cr" ~NO ~CXWG, '"[ ~,CHT-0.-WAY FQtl ,cr>J ~m[fi s~•., ill i/ED•CA;rD .. , fH[ n .. [ Mf/'1'.," l!:LL:i /H( UND ~" "'""y 1>,f P'G""-:'.><-WM. OR stc1.,1:,~·, ,HU(ff,F, ,'S (.OC~:rn. ~)"l.V!.P. "1¥ su;i,!n,r 0. •07H '"'£!:> lOCHrn Bfr>lffN _QGM/ ANO c•R[)fN <l'[N~['.i .,., ~, HtAU(,'l<tO m1.,c .. mr; ,C~·~•~V" -~", ;,~·v~ ra CC~'i"iJc·110~ ·\JPo~ i,c·TH, ;~;.~'~t.',~~i ~':. :\;r.~';.~, .. ,..., ~""'i~{',' -~-,crs AiJP"NG .. ,::,,. c,~,,.,,,,cro~ or ,~, ~, .. 'N/(q,~c-,oN :,.:!,;,,~, ,~c (·G~, ,.,,,,~,,, Pc'.'11,:A''' C() ,,,::·;,c,uV"J./C.~r AGRF/;.~r~· O•i ("."< 'i~"-L< YACH(' :J.,i: '.•'."0 OM _.,,.,J'.H ir'E OW ,,_. ;, <SI: .. ::;.•. ()C P;R< '-) CC',,A.~' A;"/. ~i.l<S A_'AS LOCA CE"', A; ,·Jo~: ·o e;;,,,·c OR ·~c o ..... ~R 'Ji ,_r;: ~-,.,," su:,, v.,:, '00 ("-W S>IA_c< BFCO.,i A_.l>,P< r;> l(I'· ;l. •c,,,Ji,~~ o,LJ•:•:·c~ AND uP(_;N R[O,,,fs1'··~1. "l:',r S~AU. CRA•,, [AS(.,,,,,; l·R uc,~;r-A(.RffMf'.-"'· A("'-" ,·os, ,0 ·"'' OP,s•,,TC5; ••:,J..:~G uotw~· ,,,o n•r ~l),.''""G ''A'1C o-~H'.:;) ".') uSl" .~,Cl{f-?,-.. AY AAO)i!i f"QR PC'Pf'Q5i'£ 1,G~ W((/NY~/i./Jr "'"' ~~ai,c 5TRf[T c'S,-P£~.;i,,·c. C~Jc/f.~CFll[NC,,Of" ~~;~;,;~.~°''""' PO~os C~l.'1[.,Pt•;rn I)< n,f .DE'lflOPY;"~' ,o ~f'Oi'!"PT< CG~taf/i~ "1ll ~/ P(.,(.[O ~:; PAA, D'" ~,.,awe 'ii,[ PiAA' 0~ f(· •0•URii" C()~$TR~(.'71.')~ c.:.,;,,Jc~,~Jr,s 5 ~/:ni.~,,;•:;~cl;~;~~~;;,;;;;~ ~'.~,:1r1~;·~~%%'·~ l"fi 1'(.,;,01; POPPCN I)>.,, Ai,l?[LMf.SI an~D, "<1;,:C-.,Y,ANJ ~r.·r.,,G C,'>U~A~V o~.,,~ YAbCc" ·~1·. ,9.'f .-~,s ~C"c!).<c:r Dc•.s "''h .,,,, ac~,c.-~o, '" ,o.:,,;,o,,;, l"-''0~ ,1,of,c PM>• A"PWF IN CO,.',SI.C>:~N >',\IH ;~[ [OGAN ~YU!~'[ "IAC'1'~'' • D[~ MFMG "'COili/~'fiA -~,, ,N s•;o·'OPCiN".~:, , ;:_,;-gcJ:.,s~:;,i: ~J;;z;,;':;;;t::t~.:;,/~~v:tca~C'A'G .,v,5;-~ '988::•5nrn2 ,~,: ,c,..,,; o• ,~[ 0/l,"C;,.vA, ,9,0 •GP)T"'~' ,,sw,c e<['1 rv,,,,·,;:~ ~· ;H[ .... OfMNG OF PsMl\ •ff'Js,-,,.-, ''! '"[ PE,-R,~"{.'//O•NC or'"~ '9<6 •mli:(M[N'. UVD[S ~:.,c :ll,,,r,. ~[(.,..,,.~"~;· .,.,,,,,!!t.R ,9;;;;:3,e··n (OD ~, PL'PDCSH /)C nf.J,cH,NS !A'ID ·a~:'"'G p .. ~K ~ .. ~,,~, '·)'~:c·a,,s, I "·'.>O' ,...,,~ ').\' ;.-,, c•srrR:v ,.,,Pc;w-r;,r.u C,+J) '? ~ •. ~I <cl,)' Ce-"C:,l AWJRDiJ iX;C;C'>'(~f~-~~[ ,-• .,,,, ,s·c:;,,,,P,('£ /J<' •l'><lRA!OT cat/fvS.rn MAK"'G M~cn°c< RUTRD~Crs ro ,,..,,.APC' NAM(;) Uhf/i"TS Be'''>-"[ .'N,[N'·>"i S~l, c, f~q n,,. "'" \A r·c~ JED'CA ~c~ 0. 5 .'[U '" ,991 DOf;v·, •ec•, ifu'T '~ ;,(' l.'N~(:P;,,;· ;H! c•.<UES '" rn:r rooo, naB. lfGAI OESCR/PDON· (~CP rli~S' A,.,f"P'CA'I r,'l.~ '~~V~AN(."c 'l~cf CO\o,,<,n,[~Y ()'ln[P ~o _,,,,,•-r2, •QC\"' 2, J ANO 4 ?• :;,,r, !.'F ~[NTO~' S•,Gilf ~IA: '1':} '.,,_r,;-Q56-~,-1~,. AS "!C.t,,t~f~ u~·~t" i![C()R.~iNG ~a :>OQ'l]:)5.i~CO'.l< ,··u··c "1-<i "''' ,~ '"'"'-'"· C't•~."-' 'G{ K•~G. '''·" o, ~-.,,. ,.~-;y. "o/')S[ ~'.:'il1CO,-,s OF ;;o·lfR~"l·"' W'S,, 1 •. ,~ .J AND n,1. 'Jc•·,,r,~· (),/sQ:0 0 '.); 'He ,·CJ,lr~.,i-50 9c'AOC,Q Of" S(C,.0'.' ~. ~,._~5-,.0 ;J NC!'1'n, •A.SU , l'~' ""· Lrl'IG ~5TEPcY A'1U .,cwr~-~5'!"~-" O[SP[C7.Y£(~ ~-'Y[ \\'!:S'!:~lv ~,GrT OF~~, '";'''" ,,. ~.Q~ ,,'f r, A'i~ i<'>: NLJ~·,,w,srrR,Y R•GH' er ~,.-y,.R~'~ :'' '"' ''("''" R/',ION Wl[e:aANC,'i. :sR •J!) ~<'s'('~c• ,)f" • ,,.v, ,,,a· "1,'I:RSFUS ,,-n, $"1J .v~~;>-',itS"[R'.l O•c;,•c OF WAv 1.,/A~,.;,.o O' ",f ~0/l',< R[.vCON r~·)tRCd~~(;(. SA,'~ ,.,, .,r.wG oc,c~·~,·, '5 ~'"'''"·W· •' scan'),.· o.~c; 0" n1e .t-c,,.1 ,o,-"'" ,.,,.,,. "CV'JI\' 1,s,cqu-,~·,.c. Sil •oJ). ·~ -;k(.'"'" ~' Sl•ff";; a~ 5 ,'Ji o.s,-,, (SO <CC) NC""' •;c.~:.:,~ .,•c>ch•'l,:t. '"AS,,,'ICTW ~)A'! (.,~,~IYCNC 0, ,PM.sac•,, rao,, s,c., r er "', P(,,:,. ,.,~ , ~i'"" .v~~·"~'-''t":c. f'[,/f'[/•C·r:,•c,R re SAID ;•,·,w. A' A PO.Ni 0'-1 r.,[ S:Ji,:C-f.15,[Q[ >" "AOr.·., or f><f ,~, '(.'C' !<A//, '"'"~ BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING BINDING SITE PLAN NE 1i4 & 5E: 114 SFC 7. T.23N. R.5E.. WM &NWi/4 85.W. //4SEC 8. T23N R.!J!::., WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINQTON ~o~tt~~·:;.;-:i, ~:~Q~o~12;1s'fcµ: :-;~~'.,' ;·'·~., ,h, -~•)(/J'.)f.'E,; .~''·" <NG'ON ,v(In o,c11,, ilM qJA'J (f"O/lMfi'( r NQ/,,fal.H'I PA(.1',C,, "i.,,L·· ~l~••!!,C C;JN P'"c C r"',tP{ ,J~, 0v'I:•~·" r.i ';.£,; Go'.:-r-n.,,.,cin ,.?' 2 Jf>~man; ~!f 'M.cOW> 0 BFONN/~C, •.' M '!nt.~',{.',."."0/,/ Df"l)je .. S~r><[ASTCRLr ,Oi[;H, .: or .. ,r u.~RG!N:.;, ~A·~.t/OR~~'°" 'IORr,,tRN RMROAO AN,) '"[ NORl"\\£511:,0, r MA<l'{;/N-Or ~-:·,,w \l'Ll ,, ;n.o~ Avf' h') PFP ·,V•O IJ:;,/ .DR!\·'2511. n.,,;:NC/;_ ·SOc!T<'~q.cr~v AcO~G s,,o. WUT><fA; 'CP, V YA'!C,W o,- "'' ~A'vi'-'<.l H'~T bf 1\¢(. ~ Q,5T<NC[ 'i 6Q >[fT; .,..,,,c• ,uJI>'tA>T[Rcr .. ~r 0/GH[.,N,,£5 ,0 ','10 RA!L~OAD ;~~~ g~ ~~{·::oi:~~~~~,?~ ~~;,f/y '";:"JJfJ;,»6, 1 ~4.~ V.o.,"!Af<"() \I''-' >T (P,j,~ •-'l A') • , .'/"JP.'(,[ ~o"tHfA;r;;:;,,, ,,(.•,c S'IJ "'"' S' :c '"'-p~'·" Qi a•~,.wm:,; P>RC[;L c_ 11<>.r P.o~nrw Qf' /H~ a~.~~wt~" ~o,rni(ii~ ,NC,; rx F<)(), mGl•T .. OF WAV <OR ,TS so,, l/1,t '" :;o,ro,W[Nr l./i'.'S 1. 1 J ;@ Ti-/€ N0..frl"'c$',:D(JAROtP D'" mt ,;Cl<)1HWE:F'GVA!fll:R or ,,cnON i!." '°""~"'" v w~r1,. R~N.~(:; r,s,. w·"'-,.•."-'10 CO'tfR~'IJ(N r (<)15 • A~f) 2 ,ii srcn'.)1/ 7, ~A!D re-,.,,,~,µ A~O .. PANGC, ecc~t'.'f-!-"""' ~-,~ucno,t, o,· ,HE ,·oRr,, (.,'N[ QF liH A"~O'Uf; •'I:! ,r;[j/,/£ (Xlf:/,/[11~,; :,Oc!,<'fAST(~LY ~NI) QaJ,ACc' '(1 /Hf.'"'" ')/AC., ,Xr.'T('l'i.f~\ .. i~ /,/~W C<ri'ilPcC'CLJ ··~')1,15~/NP ~Hno, ';J<i~C:,,J :,'·:,A,c' (.'t''(i'.~ :1,[ w,,,.,,, ,a~ '[l' ;O'.l'/!"I.Sr[R!Y . ..,z~5UR".Q, •W'/G ,,.~ !.IA,/J 'f?<CK C[~ >TR trNt. 'RC>f, rl<f S0c"C•~S Cfil). Y £N~' 'JF . %'Q,,,.,c,o,. .~0R'"tl?N we·, M's-lcf ~o JJ ,.,a,,\o~"'f!ASC£R1, or T1'[ ro.:r:-,M'G OESCR,af,; .,,.,,-.,, , " " B[G''l'l.'>,G AT I, ~{)mY ;!~ 'ff.> ~O(n>if>!;'i,v>i\.-. MCAW~i:0 . R'IJ/ALL r M1n AY R,,:r,, .,,.;,g ,~ rH[ cc,·:m ,J/,/f "~ ,-;i .. ~~ AS NOW CC.'1Sr'lJCITT!, rney., %q.,,, S'A/rC,,, ,')<;~,:b~ IH[."Cf sa,•r,,.w.1rr>i. Y j,"/ A $"lA'~H: c,/,/C ,a~"'°'/,/' 1'; ,:,cu NCRW\1£5ff"R: Y. ,,,-.,;,;R[D C?CO, '"' ~(X.'1KASr[fll·r, ilV;H.r i)F ""' [l~'E •r sur.,u .;:AnON ·~>HOO. rY[N.;:( ;;DN'!WWG .\01,:l'h\\£'i'!"Pc, .,, AN A/J(il[ /0 ,,;,,-~,G"' ,~,''~'''ON ,~r ~aon,1,fo;rc~,, ,•.Ni: u, n1c Pc'IJ 'CO' R'G"' o, WAY 0' OURrlN~:Orl /JORN[l?N me A/JI) SO!Jl~/;AHrn!J o, ';PUR rRACJ< rl[A08CX~ ST~no,s a+J.: ~ i~t ON!! 01 "'" ocscm.~rn LIN,-~.~i) no er Dcsc~:?;.a~ ,r'Ar ~:J~"O~ r,, ,.,r ,~u:>< 66G cec-o, ;~£ ~o,;n,«rl' !);'•~T[O or r,,r 5.,,_..,,,"'"S' %'AQ,''q •• C/C~CN 8 . ."() ..... ,,,.,, :lJ N()R'h, RA~·;(~ f.-15', ~·"· ..,.,,~,, ['[', ~0"-~ 0,-'~i' N'.),i"'' ,."-0' N~;:,~. on., sc;:,n., ,•,;: s,--w.:-.::,, ..,_,c VOi''>iCP, " ,·,•:y;,~~ ~· "'[ ffN"[;>'.w[S or ~i:_c' • ,,.,,,< ~DI"'• ,11n MA.',\ S,/l[C '· ~'()" ~·,15 ;;~er;~·~;:,;,., u::rn• rYA; "O"no,, '.Y,,,,o, co;.",1"'i-r, ,1 fht, '" ~· R[tlrON ffY OffO> HCCJROI:!! S.'llDfn R[COPJ•·,r. ~M ,,.,,,~JJ!>< •NO 85q9/~0916 c.-H ~.~""o~· c• n,r ,w;:,,-,~r,r av~R:(,i OF'"' rnun11,p;c (}CA~,c~ Q[ Ster,~ B ,,,,,..,,n,c' 2J ,·oRr,•. ~I.OGC 5 ,~s' w~ . .;J(:F.'R.'lfEU <S •:XJ.OW'i ~,,.,;,~;~GA'.·!"[ NJ/.~-~F ,.v,,:es.:.,;;1,o,; QF n-<f /,001'! ;w1 & .;-A,U 5c'!l!ll"s,o,· ..,,,~ 'hi' ,•oP 'Y!VI, u.<oo,;c,:c~ 01 r,,f ,.,.,_s, i.'~[ !)C PAfl~.~'tf:,~f,: ~s snw; ,N THC P!.A' or Ri"N'DN P~',/ P~H. A<; Pr/<"F'~A' 9i'.CORJi~ ,,'1 V(·CU/Jl fQ Dr "' AT>. KA(<. ~,, R[WR03 QC K'N<l (0<.'NCf. ,, •", "/)<[."Cf scur><tRl Y A[CNQ" SA!D Pil<)Ou(rro,,,. 'O 7'c·f01N1 }'5 F(U /IQl!IH OF 11,r s~c;)-r u,,.: 0,-5A•0 =·''~5j()I,, "<(:\Ol "~H •0AOA 1,n "'""' MIO o•S'M'f_:I:! F[U"J.ORn, ~ierut:;~(~/~[\'.tJ?RE~~,':r'D!, v PR.?JC!C'lON pr "'_( n-<!NCf 50\.'ll<·"Al~O s .. ;:, P/(>)CUHO (.'/:NltilclM., ro fH[ • NO/Ill, O' S,,7lm, 6/;'J ff.fr iJF \"A/0 5~:J,11rS'CN, . ~J~Jcol~' o11 ~f ~;~'.r;~,':, 'air ~~Y~ %'(!';.:~, "a£c.5 4"l~U[ ~'0/W<, A'$ 5"('"" If' rl<C P:M ~I Ri'l.'TON (M'Y PcA7"•' NO, 2, AS PrP Pi.H Pl;COP:>~ '~ ",'LU!,ff '1 OF ~l.~'TS. p~~c :u. REC0-1DS r;,r )(WG COLJN r~·· ' n{[NC[ ;oum[~(t ACCJNG SA'~ ,>Ro;;ucno~ TO 7),e N()Rr, i•/.1[" O,.' NC~:~ ,;r,., STRfFT. n,rn::,: HGrrs•n ,.;.o~·c >"D."°""·' ,·~-cc< N~~,,., "''". .H<>rn ro t"Hf £~S!'fR: y ... ~G,~ or .... AB'hi,<Jt,'f~ m,o, '""'""' 'IJR1'ii•,· "~~'~OA[' >i'G'"': .c, -~·'· '''[N'.:[ NOR"-•CR,' Sc,V,G SAi(. ,·c~r ,v-~~r "' ,~E ;.c,~.H uN, O' ~;·r. 5J<;1i,c,s,o~-: : f'<[IJC( [A'j!fR'.' 'COl,C ;>,U ,•'.).-,1~.:l,ti[ ,t, ~rr "(JmT ~,- tlfC.'~~'~:, UCEN ')OAf ?ORn,:,,,· CCN{la''cU CC,"'<[ Mr Or Rf,.U)N ,o~ ')![ W'D~i<.'hG ()C 'I')'/''<~:" ;:µcu B' '.)f['r.; P[COPO£J UM)[~ P./XDR~•·,s NO:,$ ,,(>IS,•,;,;G!). '1(,0''~),o. ,,rMi~·J ~)091 OQ9~B. B5G<;; !'.)Q ,a A~'.) 85QY' J,;,yo '· s,,;,A1c "N n,r c,r,-or N:~r,w. cu~,iry o, ~,.~c. S'A;t),c ~•;PINO"/nlJ. B/NDING SIT£ Pl AN ARC.A£. ~--~~··--c--·-,·--- 1_01$1WC Nlf..<S: I-_so ,·;_-f-«:~.-,., __ l~A'ftN: 9~ol.ll/N~-,2~4 ~~'if~ PM?K -••• ~ v•i l.9'1 .. 'l_'_ . fill> !r0r"l_ __ -~----s.,o,~cJ. ___ a;7, ~£'.c' __£___}_'.I_B --~--1 . ~'"·· '-----c--'',, --'J-" --"'-1 ,?RA(;{_;___,;.----c , •. ,.,,_ o_c~ _JI !FA(,, · · ~~., c,a ~u -'~"'(·~ rn-~~~/ ___ n~J; L_'~'~'~ :;.c:Ai..E' ,J 'Gl' 2~·0 a I : :$.ef) _1 me,• 200 "*' ""™ -u "" H~-at!' ' u "· H4T42 4, " goo ~, " ' ·" ff~· ~ "" 11,w-=i;7'47"[" J1111 ' ' y Jl.10 '"' '" / -u '" "' u, u, "' "' '" "' u, 11.4<0 SU'51!2 1" ~I.J! '·" ffi ffiU ,.~ "" '"'' u u ,:,,._.~D ,· x ,-w~~•u<~ !.((!NLJMC~' W/ CQPP[R .,,~ ·~ e,o,·g· o.>r OCH'"' 1 0' n[c~II' A50f<,, T •;, 50C"O...' ('(!l(Ntrl ,, •B 1~G6 , >oc· LUA-04-081-BSP UID-3!'! -OO!J BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING BINDING SITE PLAN Nf: 1i4 & SE 1/4 SEC 1. T.23."I. R 5E, Iii.\! &NW1i4 &SvV I/4$£C 8, 123N RSE ViM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOT 4 95 ~2' so 8 2/J A~' !.OT 5 !, 1%,Cl2 ,~ !I 2) 45 OC(e~ TRACTX .Nor A pA,~T NORTH 6TH STREET 1?•51~-~i· @ <l•JJ"W'JJ" ,~J0006' @~?9"JZ':;B"[(i!) _ R-5;? 6J" (Z) r.:·J~20· 10{)' , ® SB9't;>Sr8·c("J. ,a.oc;· · µ),vc~·56"'41T. 2'8 os S.91. '92 SC ~· , i 5? ~c 00/c:ING F/EAL TY (;QV."A!,JY C!TY O, · Hi:NTON TRACT Q LAKESHORE LANDING BINDJNG SITE PLAN ' 11 ' ~1 I ! I I <~ F ~: TRACT P ( :J:1J•~o 'iQ1c! •I ;1,~.w, ~, ~,,-c, ~J50 "'-"'' VJIJ, .Porh•T dolU,ll., w.,1,1,v."'o •Bat,~II•7J ,: g! "' 5•~J~,n NORTH SC:ALC : '')[' 2C0 ( rctr ,1 ~.11vc.i ~ 20~ f"T : ----TR-:~c~~T~R~~::~~s~:E;Ef\~o;~,Hi,.;,.,,~-;~"l--,1 .. f§ ~ }~/ " '{ LUA-J5-001J-8SP LND-J:>-OOIJ l i .is. ". ·1 --:--.. ,, -Is. ·: -~j ~.c,·.:;,,r:· ,,~ c,.~-""'", , 'NC:/cr,A '••1(b); •/V _£_;:;e_ .,,.·;/,,} 3: -~;.;: --rRACT:.'i s~~ ~£~Ail !/;"~'~;,. K 4-l}U)'jO" ~~10; 85 5'1"W(R) -,oo· ff=!l22 62" ---b-M.1.no· L-80 70 N. I L 10TH ~ MBS78'72"W 1J~.f0 SL N. 10TH NOJ;t;~~·., I N')f)It~t(~_ NO!l',G'Z<"< "·u' I "°°N~n-_-~ TRACT F 51, EXIST. PARK A VE. RIW @ ;1i~{~: ... @ t'!!,I;~~- •. ,_ .. 2<" 20070314001933.:: Return Address: rn i. \\ :si I)..&~~ 1111111111111111 20070314001933 W & H PACIFIC AFC 80.00 PAGE091 OF 003 03/14/Z007 14:38 KING COUNTY, WA Pim, p,int "t=e!oformadon w ASIDNGTON STATE RECORDER' SC over Sheet mew 65.04) Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to yow docuineot mu,t be filled In) ' L(},,\'n~~ ~\'\%Sl..., ~~q~ .. 3. 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference#' s on page .1(\ { Q.t... of document Grantor{s) (Last name, first name, initials) I. °'~~a".:,. ~~a.x-. 2.\>~ £-'Y~ \)<A~~ ~~ I/>,.. 2 Cl '01..\ \ 'L '1. ') t> x:i I:> 'b':;;I,, Additional names on page __ of document. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) ~: ~~ ,\,c. oit'i}':",\ ~"-6 '£ 2-1::>~'-\ \ 'l. 2. ~m;;,?,$1., Additionar names on page __ of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) ~\\\. ~~'ll.. '!'I. W<_Q." ,·,v.. '!\.~~ ,u;:."()"\ 'l" "'.,"L__ 1/ v.. ~~"' ' \ 'l..~ '(\','(l.':.~ \ \.l,'.'>"(Y, Additional legal is on page __ of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 0 Assessor Tax # not yet assigned ~"!._ ~~ \.,. c:,'1\~"\'-0.\ ~~:':& ~'L~'-'\\1.1..'~>;:,~~~ -- The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing infonnation provided herein. I am requestmg an emergency nonstandard recordmg for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recorcling processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the ori inal document. ______ Signature of Requesting Party _,;;. RETURN ADDRESS: W&H Pacific 3350 Monte Villa Parkway Bothell, WA 98021 AFFIDA Vll' OF MINOR CORRECTION OF MAP To; King County Auditor NE V. SE V. SEC 7, T 23N, R 5E, WM NE V. SE V. SEC 8, T 23N, R 5E, WM Gov. Lot, DLC, HES, Plat or other: ------------ !, Christopher S. Royak, being first duly swom on oath, deposes and says: 20070314001<1:l:l '.·" That I arn a Professional Land Surveyor; that I made a survey ofland for Boeing Lakeshore Landing Building Site Plan which document was recorded on the 23'' day of December, 2004, in book 225 page(s) 83 • 86, Recording Number 20041223000856, Records of King County auditors Office, Seattle, Washington, said document being a Binding Site Plan (Record of Survey, Plat, Short Plat, Binding Site Plan, Boundary Line Adjustment, Condominium, Large Lot Division). That there being a minor survey, spelling, mathematical or drafting error, or omitted signature which docs not in any way materially subvert the approval of the original document by changing lot areas so as to affect zoning approvals, easement conditions of approval or access roadways, the affiant approves the following changes to the aforementioned recordings as follows: To Wit: 1) Sheet 2 • Note 5: 12" Line should read "Re-Recording of 1976 Agreement". 2) Sheet 3 -Monument in case at N. 8th St. and Garden Ave. N.: a. Change coordinate to N 183798.226 E 1302863.410 b. Remove'" As Shown on Ref. 1" 3) Sheet 3 ·'/.Section Corner Monument Near Intersection Future N. 8th St. and Future Logan Ave. N.: Change coordinate to N 18347.4789 E lJ 00846.5866 4) Sheet 3 · South Line Lot 3: Remove 9.1' dimension between new and old R/W lines. 5) Sheet 3 -South Line Lot 4: Remove 9.43' dimension between section line and south lot line. 6) Sheet 3 -West Line Lot 3: Line no. 3 bearing should be N 00'56'42"E. 7) Sheet 4 -Detail for Tract D: Radius for easterly curve on south side tract D should be 560.50'. . .-.;.· 200703140019'.l'.1 · .. , License Number SURVEYOR SEAL STATEOFWASHINGTON, ) County of KJNG ) ,i / · () 14 }L On thls day personally appeared before me --''-...:=-·_,_1.:..,_l"...,lec?"-_.:..l"\_:.O~;::/+-'-A:..:... __________ _ to be known to be the individual/corporation described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that (he/she) .ht'.,,sigoed the same (his/her) .h.i.s. free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. 71 M , / 2 -J Given under my hand and official seal this 1 -day of "If' I , nt tJv Notary Public Seal ,...,,,,-.1111111, ,,,, ~ Wit. I,,, ~ ....... s-'t'""%1 """" ,,,., ff ~,;.$-~!>l0'4 t.f!,,~ '1 ~ :I ot4.a. ~\t ~ -"8 • ,,. \ >',· ;; ~ ... -~ -~ ~ i ~ ~ ;.;:en~ ... c.. =---:::: ~ ~ ~ 0 "e\.~ § ~ : i1 1', ,,,,, S, O 5. o1,_s-~ ;;: I "Ar. 141 ......... h -J '<.,~ IL\\\\\\'\.\'-'' .,::."'-' :::, . 11111 1 o,,_ WAS'<'~',,$° I 11\n"''''''' $/;h~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ~~ Jp, /.-u1 • NOTE: Country Auditor Office, Provide one copy per "WAC 332-l 30-050(3Xe)" to the Wash. State Dept of Natural Resources, Public Land Survey Office, P.O. Box 47060, Olympia, Wa. 98504-7060 20070314001933.:: Return Address: \}.) '8,. \-\ '\) l).b_~ ~ -,111111111111111 20070314001933 y & H Pl'ICIFIC AFC 60.00 PRGE001 OF 003 13/14/2001 14:38 KING COUNTY, UA l'leue nrint or tync informadon WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S C over She t (R e CW 65.04) Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to your docuinent must be filled in) 1.(\$5~ ;fr ~~'\I-.. ~~'-ll'&~. 3. 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference #' s on page l(\ { Q>... of document Grant.'~:;f!) (Last name, first name, initials) J. ~ ':Jlp~'--a,. \Ll:,\\~ . 2 • '\'\,.,o._"J._ 'Q--1? n :\a ()~\MA, ~H:!;ld1~ ~ 1.1:) '()I..\\ 'L 'l )I:> '(:)I'.:, ~'Slo Additional names on page __ of document. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) ~: ~~-\.<,, o?t<&~ viL0M!'."e) ii.'1.1)\'.:>\.\.\'l.'1..":/;)\)\::,j?,SI,, Additional names on page __ of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) ~\Q. '\JL\, ";i'I/._ ''"' wi._Q_" • '('');1., 'f\.'£;i"-. 1v::>X1"\ l\<L'I" ~"l-..1 / v.. R~ .. :e, , , 'l..» 'C\','(l.',,"'I?,. , 1$>'\Y"\ -· ·----· Additional legal is on page __ of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number D Assessor Tax# not yet assigned ~"I-~~\.-<>'Q\t"ND,. "'."-~:<'& :ii,._ 'L\3", "'\ 11.-'?,~t:>::,(h ~ The Aoditor/Recorder will rely on the infonnation provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the ori inal document. ---· ------·--- -~· RETURN ADDRESS: W&HPacific 3350 Monte Villa Parkway Bothell, WA 98021 AFFIDAVIT OF MINOR CORRECTION OF MAP To: King County Auditor NE V. SE V. SEC 7, T 23N, R 5E, WM NE V. SE V. SEC 8, T 23N, R SE, WM Gov. Lot, DLC, HES, Plat or other:------------- !, Christopher S. Royak, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 20070314001 ~~~ ,:·"· That I am a Professional Land Surveyor: that I made a survey of land for Boeing Lakeshore Landing Building Site Plan which document was recorded on the 23'' day of December, 2004, in book 225 page(s) 83 -86, Recording Number 20041223000856, Records of King Conoly auditors Office, Seattle, Washington, said document being a Binding Site Plan (Record of Survey, Plat, Short Plat, Binding Site Plan, Boundary Line Acljustment, Condominium, Large Lot Division). That there being a minor survey, spelling, mathematical or drafting error, or omitted signature which does not in any way materially subvert the approval of the original document by changing lot areas so as to affect zoning approvals, easement conditions of approval or access roadways, the affiant approves tho following changes to the aforementioned recordings as follows: To Wit: 1) Sheet 2 -Note 5: 12" Line should read "Re-Recording of1976 Agreement". 2) Sheet 3 -Monument in ease at N; s" St. and Garden Ave. N.: a. Change coordinate to N 183798.226 E 1302863.410 b. Remove'"As Shown on Ref. I" 3) Sheet 3 -V. Section Corner Monument Near Intersection Future N. 8th St. and Future Logan Ave. N.: Change coordinate to N 18347.4789 E 1300846.5866 4) Sheet 3-South Line Lot 3: Remove 9.1' dimension between new and old R/W lines. 5) Sheet 3 -South Line Lot 4: Remove 9.43' dimension between section line and south lot line. 6) Sheet 3 -West Linc Lot 3: Linc no. 3 bearing should be N 00'56'42"E. 7) Sheet 4 -Detail for Tract D: Radius for easterly curve on south side tract D should be 560.50'. . 20070314001 !;13~ .. :,.:. License Number SURVEYOR SEAL STATE OF WASHJNGTON, ) County of KING ) 11 / · f} i,1 /L On this day personally appeared before me ~-'--'-·~l-'-'-i"--''lec?,c_ __ l'\_O~J+-4:...... _________ _ to be known to be the individuaVcorporation described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that (he/she) .bl,,signed the same (his/ber) his. free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. 71 , / 7 / Given under my hand and official seal this J -day of /tfl • , n!J tfv Notary Public Seal "'''''-"11111, ..::,.''.,. WI; 1'11 ..:F" ...:. .. ~t\\\\\l\1~&0'',~ ff .~}·~'o" ~,,,. '-'~ -=-~ 014,t. ...:\t ~ '!; .::-0 ~ I). \ ;,., •• _::"(j ~ -~ ~ ~ ~.~ , ~ -:: ~ E ~ /.CA~ ,. c, =.;:,-~ ~\oc"s\.'\0"1 ~= o E t,I '·' ,,, "·05· 'I,, &--I rA\ 11 1 ,....... -I ,.._' •111\\\'"''' ~ .;:, 11111 1 O,::, WAS~v.,,'-""'.:::, "~ \ \\ \\\,,,,, ...... ~l?h~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ~ J~, /,{/,;!f. ' NOTE: Country Auditor Office, Provide one copy per "WAC 332-130-050(3Xe)" to the Wash. State Dept of Natural Resources, Public Land Survey Office, P.O. Box 47060, Olympia, Wa. 98504-7060 .. · Wh¢n Recorded Return To: Gerald Bressi our Office of the General Counsel The Boeing Company JI If llllllll llU ~~~~~3It?E?s80~1§71 . P.O. Box 3707, MC 13-08 Seattle, Washington98124 12/28/2004 14·09 KING COUNTY, UA DOCUMENTTITLE:Declaration of Covei'iams; Conditions, Easements and Restrictions REFERENCE NUMBERS OF RELATE!) DOCUMENTS: GRAN'TOR/BORROWER: ... · The Boeing Company .. GRANTEE/ASSIGNEE/BENEFICIARY: NIA/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Burdened Property)Lots J-4, BoeingLakeshore Landing, ESP 20041223000856, as more ftllly(lescribed in Exhibit A beginning on page 12 of this Decliiration, ... A legal description ofthe benefited property by gins on page 13 of . . ·. this Declaration ·. .. . .. · ... ' ., · · ... ··· , . ': c .:,,· ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S). 082305-9220~05; 082305-9221-04,08.::p05-90ll-08; 082305- 9222-03; 082305-9079-07; 082305-9204-05; 082305-9037-08;.0823Q5-9152,07 .. · tXCISt TAX Nor \~£QUIRED l(inv.R~ Division BY' ~· ~ev:(.c/ 'Deputy . --·-. . . Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 1 Of 15. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTIONS TI·IIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTIONS (hereinafter refe"rrcd to as the "Declaration") is made, granted, declared, ·•. established and reserved this 28th day of December, 2004 . . WHEREAS, The Bqeing Q'omp;n;, aI)elaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Declarant") is the· ow11er of certaillreal prpperty legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a pit.11 hereof (the "Properly"); and · WHEREAS, the Dedarant also owns substaotial property in the general area of the Property, described in Exhibit B_ (the "Retained Property"), which is affected by operations at the Property; and · ·. · WHEREAS, the Declarant wishes to irisurethM .the use .oLthe Property does not adversely affect the use of the Retained Property and permits the owner of the Retained Property to use and enjoy \he Retained Property. · · · NOW, TIIEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to . .be derived hereunder, the Declanmt hereby makes, grants, declares and establishes ihfs D¢claratjoil: I. DEFINITIONS AND PURPOSE. a, . . Prt.ijett. ~s used herein, the term "Project" shall mea~ the development of the Property, the R;eiained Property or any part thereof, the redevelopment of the Property, · the .. ,Retained Property; or-· any part thereof, or the use of the Property, the Retained Property, or any part thereof. · ,.,· . b. Intentionally Omitt~d. · c. Road and Street Designations. Designations of roads and streets in this Declaration shall be deemed to apply to the streets referred to herein as designated and laid out on the date hereof, provided that this DeclanitfonShall continue to apply to said streets and roads if called by a differeritriame .it any time irj..!he future and/or if aligned different! y in the future from their .aligO:lnent on the date hereof. d. Improvements shall mean and refer/to all structu~~. imprCJvemeins, equipment, fixtures, objects used for decorative or incidental purposes; and construction ofany kind on any Lot whether above or below the land surface, >whether pennaneiif or temporary, including without limitation, Buildings, utility lines, driveway, pave(! parking areas, pathways, fences, screening walls, retaining walls, plantJngs, plant~ .trees and ~hmbs, Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 2 of 15 2. inigation and drainage pipes and fixtures, catch basins or other devices for the collection and/or detention of storrnwater runoff, lighting fixtures and signs. e.· Occupant shall mean and refer to, collectively, the Owner and any other Person or . Persons entitled, by ownership, leasehold interest or other legal relationship, to the right to . o<;cupy aHor l!ny portion of the Property. f . Owner shall m.eiiri· and refer to the Person or Persons holding record fee title to the Prqperty (including, as applicable, Peclarant, but excluding any Person holding such interest merely as s~curity for the. ~cfonnal)Ce, of an obligation), and their respective heirs, successors .and a~signs. · ·· ·· · · g. ~·;hall m~m and referl() an; individual, partnership, corporation, trust, estate or other legal entity. h. Lot shall mean and refeno any 1:gal lot into which the Property or any part of it has on the date hereof or shali hereafter be divided. TERM. . . The restrictions declared, reserv,;,d, granted and est~~l}shed,her¢by Shallcontinue in full force and effect for as long as any portion oftlie Retained Property is own~d, occupied, or used by (a) .The Boeing Company, or (b) any direct or in~irect subsidiary. of'fhe Boeing Company, or (c) any'corporation, business, or other entity that is contrtilled .by or under common control with The Boeing Company or (d) any corporate, busine&>,.PJ:: other enti~y that supplies The. Boeing Company or any entity identified in clause (b) or (c) With goods or services in support.of the aviation industry, including the business of designing, producing, maintaining, repairing, or modifying aircraft or spacecraft. This Declaration may be terminated or modified only with the consent of The Boeing Qompany or the parties referred to in clauses (b), (c), or (d) if they are the awrier or oscup?nt or the Retained Property. 3. COVENANTS, CONt>ITIONS,.AND RESTRICTIONS The Declarant hereby ~;venants th.<11. the. Property will be used by Declarant and by all of its successors in title to the Property, and by all occupants oftlie Property in compliance with and subject to the following: 3.1. Pennitted Purposes; Prohibition pf Certain Uses. The Property shall be used solely for purposes permitted by theDevelopment Agreement for Renton Plant Development dated November 24, 2003 (as it may be amended frmn time to time, the "Development Agreement"), recorded in the recqrds of King Comity, Washingtun under recording no. 20031210001637, unless otherwise agreed in writingby thel)ecl,ira11L The Declarant may prohibit any other use, even if such use is pennitted under,.or would b11.· ·· allowed as a nonconforming use under, the City of Renton Zoning Code or land use .. regulations as in effect on the date of this Declaration or as they may be amended &lany Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs {Closing) 20041226 Page 3 of 15 time hereafter, PROVIDED that the Declarant shall not object to any first-class institutional quality mixed use development project comprised of residential, retail, office, hotel, and/or commercial uses . . Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, under no circumstances shall the Property b.e used in any way for or in connection with (a) the sale, distribution, or display of pornographic, obscene,.or so-called "adult" literature, periodicals, movies, videos, pictwes, phptographs, Clf 'the H)fo PROVIDED HOWEVER that nothing herein shall .. · prClhibit users such as Bordets, Ba.mes & Noble, Blockbuster, or Walgreens who may sell .. ordistribvte one ore more ofsuph progucts_ as an ancillary part of its primary business; (b) the presentat~on of socG!(lled "a<.llllt" ent(l!tainment (c) the operation of a strip club, gentlelllen's c(u&, or anest~blishme4tproviding entertainment in the fonn of table or lap dancing cw{<!) the sale/distributio11; or display of drug paraphernalia. The Property shall be kept and maintained in a firs_t 0 class manner,_ . .' . : : .. · ,.· .. Without limitingJhe generality6fthe for~going, thefol!owing uses are expressly prohibited on the Pr<>perty: . . . (l) hospitals; (2) schools, excepUhai post-secondary v.ocational,tr:de, professional, and technical educational institutionssha]l_be allo~ed. · . . (3) residential uses and pre-second1ry school day care facilities are prohibited entirely on Lot I; residential uses are prohibited on the ground levef or.below ground level on Lots 2, 3, and 4 of the Ptopen:y PROVIDED THA_T development of residential units at grade level will be permitted if the Qwner qses construction methods that will prevent any indoor air migration of materials that may adversely affect human health {such methods to include, by way of exainp!e but not limitation, installation of adequate vapor barrier and passive or active ve11tila,ionsys.1erns). (4) men's clubs; (5) traiiercourts without Declarant's prior written approval; ' ' . . . (6) distillation of bones; .· (7) junk ors;;vage yards, or dumpirtg, disposal, incineration or reduction of garbage, sewage offal, dead animals or r~fuse; · (8) rendering of fat or animajtissues; (9) stockyard or slaughter of animals; Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 4 of 15 (10) refining of petroleum or its products; (11) smelting of ores; ( 12) raising or boarding of animals, except for animals kept within a Euikling and necessary for onsite laboratory or research purposes, except for retailers such as Petsntart or Petco that may board animals as an ancillary part of . their·businesses; ... i .·· ·· ·· ···. ··.· (13}ri;tail or,Wholesale by any automobile, truck, camper or mobile horn() dealerships hayiirg outside storage and inventory; . . (1~) opeQCr6sS-dock truck terminals without Declarant's prior written approval ; • (15)any otheruse that is hii2ard6us to any Lot(s) on the Property or the Retained Property or contiguou·s prnpertiesbyrcason of fumes, dust, noise, electromagnetic or nucle;ir radiation, thermafp9Uution, liqµid or solid waste pollution, or particular danger of fire Qr.explosion; · · 3.2, Design Standards. In corinection with the initialcteVe!opmcnt arid construction of any Improvements on the Property or the construction of any material alterations, renovations or additions to any Improvements on the Property, or any material redevelopment of the Property, Buyer covenants that (i) Buyer shall utilize the services of a duly licensed architectural firm elCpCrienccd in the design of retail shopping centers and mixed~tise developments and (ii) that the exterior elevations and design of all building{mprovements and exterior signagc,J1ghting, landscaping and screening will provide for a level of materials, quality and appearanci:: comparable to other high quality retail shopping center/ mixed-use projects, taking into account the ineorp(iration··of tenants' or operators' prototypical architectural design features. : • · ·· · 3.3. Declara~: IO·~ He!~ ~armless from Construction Costs, Mitigation Costs, etc. in Connection wii!i Development of the Property. The owner or owners of all or any portion of the Property shaflrelease the.owner or owners of all or any portion of the Retained Property from and s~all indemnify and h9Jd hiu:n1less the owner or owners of all or any portion of the Retained Propertr from and agai~st anyand all construction costs, fees, or charges associated with the development or redevelopment of all or any portion of the Property, whether such obligation tal(es the form of construction of public or private improvements, the payment of mitigation or impactfees or the payment of assessments levied by any improvement district formed to finance.lhcconstruc;tion of any such improvements. The owner or owners of al(or any portion ofthe Ret&ined Property shall release the owner or owners of all or any portion of the Property from and shall indemnify and hold harmless the owner or owners of all oranY po,tion of thePropcrt}' from and against any and all construction costs, fees, or charges associated With th!'· . development or redevelopment of all or any portion of the Retained Propertyiwhelher Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 5 of 15 such obligation takes the form of construction of public or private improvements, the payment of mitigation or impact fees or the payment of assessments levied by any improvement district formed to finance the construction of any such improvements . . · 3.4. ·use of Groundwater. No Owner, occupant, tenant, or other person on the Pmperty shall withdraw or use groundwater on or under the Property for any purpose other than ·environmentaltesting, monitoring or remediation . .. 3.5. .· Co~~~ant Not toOb[e:ct to Any Development on or Use of the Retained Property . . The Qwn~r ofthe Property s~a!l_not object.to any governmental agency with respect to any ''Exempted Developm~nt" on all·or;inyportion of the Retained Property, except to the extent that (1) such development; redevelopment, proposal, plan or agreement would require the payment by said owner of.mitigation costs in connection therewith or (2) such development, redevelopment, proposal, plan or agreement would contravene items 3.1(4) through (15) or (3) such development, redevelopment, proposal, plan or agreement provides for low income or s11bsidizcd housing or (4) such qevelopmcnt, redevelopment, proposal, plan or agreement contravenes the-De\elopmeiitAgreement as it may be amended from time to time. "Eiiempted D,;veloprrient/ means ~Jly development or redevelopment on, or proposal, plan, or agr(:~111ent for any pQrtion of.the Retajrnaj Propert.y that is owned, occupied, or used by (a}The Boeing.Company/or (b) an.y direct or indirect subsidiary of The Boeing Coinpa,11y/or (c) any corpora\ion, business; or other entity that is controlled by or under common control withThe 13oeing Co91pany or (d) any corporate, business, or other entity that supplies The:Bo¢ingCompany or any entity • ideniified in clause (b) or (c) with goods or services in support of thf aviation industry, including the business of designing, producing, maintaining,-rejlaiting, or niodifying aircraftor spacecraft, . . 3.6. Rig!its n;garding Test Wells; Easement regarding Environmental Matters. The ~cll\f~nt .shali ~~;e a nonexclusive easement to enter the Property for the purpose of obtaining I"eadi11gs from monitoring wells as shown on the Plan attached hereto and ·taking s.ainples .t'ronf such wells and for the maintenance, repair, replacement, renewal, decOmniissiQning, and ciosing of such. wells. Such easement shall terminate after the Washingtori State Departtnent of Ecology ("DOE") and the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") remove all requirements for the continuation of such monitoring: Upon the removal of all such requirements, the Declarant, at no expense to the owner at ehe tirne--of the .Property, shall close and decommission all such test wells in accordance with applicable regulations, and upon such wells being so decommissioned, such casement sh.all teiminate. While the wells are located on the Property, they shall be maintained in a good state of repair and operation in accordance with applicable legal requirements by the Declaranr at nQ exp~nse to the Owner of the Property. Upon request by the owner .of the Property, (lie Peclitrani shall provide the logs for such wells at no charge, The owner or the Property shalLnot construct any improvements nor allow the construction of any irnprdy~.m,erits (either.than parking area curbs and paving and drainage/landscaping berms)within five {5).feetof Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 6 of 15 any of the wells shown on the Plan. The Declarant shall provide the owner of the . Property with copies of all reports provided to the DOE and/or USEPA with respect to such wells and monitoring activities and copies of any written communications received bythcpeclarant from DOE, USEPA or any other governmental authority over such wells .· (as the case may be, an "Environmental Authority") with respect to such wells or test results, If.an Environmental Authority orders, or indicates in writing that it may order, the installation of additiqnal ·-monitoring wells on the Property, the Declarant shall give the owner pf .the Property written notice thereof as soon thereafter as is reasonably · possible. /So long. as the propos9d·locations of such additional wells and the manner of their installation shall not unre,asonably interfere with either the business operations on the Property° or \he planne\l developli1e!li OfTedevelopment of the Property, the owner or owners of the Property shall:11ot un~ea§<inably withhold consent to the installation of such additional ·wells. Not)Vithstanding thil foregoing, if the owner or owners of the Property reasonably believes that the location of such additional v,,ells will interfere with either said owner's business ciperatlons Ori the Property, or the planned development or redevelopment of the Property, .said owner feserves the right to contest the particular location of any such wells, ·and with respeet' 10 such contest, the owner or owners of the Property shall hold the Dcclarant free and haniiless with resprst thereto. Such contest shall be conducted by advising the Declat:~nt of stich obj¢tions. · The Declarant Lots shall provide such objections to the Environmental Authority ;md the Declarant and the owner or owners of the Property shall be.entilfcdto piovide-rep,rescntatives w.ho shall be present when such objections are discussed with the .EnYironmental Autllority. Upon the installation of such additional wells, the Plan shall be amended to indicate their locations by an amendment to this Declaration that shall be tecordecl in. the Refords and the easement reserved to the Declarant pursuant to this paragraph}ha}I be deemed to apply to such ;1dditiona],wdis, ' Both the Dedarant and the "DOE" may enter the Property for the purpose of · inyestigating or remediating-any hazardous substance or dangerous waste (as such terms ar~ used in applipitble law) or other-substance regulated or governed by any law related to the protection 6'f lhei:nvironlilent <ir of.human health, which substance is discovered after the date hereof tc,,exist oil or belqw Uie surface of the Property, or migrating on or below the surface cit'th'e Property, as the result of prior operations by Declarant on or in the vicinity of the Property, PROVIDED that any damage to improvements on the Property caused by Declarant in conducting s11ch investigatiO(l ~nd remediation efforts shall be repaired by Declarant at'ltss'o!ecostandexpense, arid.PROVIDED FURTHER that the foregoing does not apply to claitns agilirtst DOE; which clail)'.Js th.e owner of the Property shall pursue against DOE directlyc.. · · 4, ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER MATTERS, The DeclaranLsh.afl have the right to enforce this Declaration by obtaining injunctive reliefimd/or by other lawful means. However, Declarant shall not have any lien rights (other than as a judgment liencidn conse,i],uerice·<ifa suit or action to enforce Declarant's rights hereunder) or security interests in arid to the Property arising from the provisions of this Declaration, or any breach thereofor 6t\wiwise pursu,mt to any applicable laws in connection with the enforcement of this Declaration. ·· Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 7 of 15 4 .. 1 Constructive Notice and Acceptance • Every Person who now or hereafter owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Property is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed fo every covenant, condition, restriction and provision contained in this Declaration, whetheror not any referen.ceto this Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such Perso!). acquired an)hteresfln the Property. 4,2 Declar~nt'sRights UO:der 6th~~])ocuments · ... Nothing herein co~;a\ned shajl pr~judicc or diminish in any way Declarant's rights under an)'other documents tbat have beeitor that may be subsequently recorded against all or any portions of the Property. •. · 4.3 Notices Except as otherwise expresslyprovided inthis D'l;ation 9r required by law, all notices, consents, requests, demands, approv~ls, authorizal.ion~ and other communications providtd for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been i:luly glve!l if and when personally served or seventy-two (72) ):iouis ;i:fter beiog·seritJ;,y United States first class mail, postage prepaid, to the Owner of the P,:operty at the Propertyarn;lto the Decfaraht at Boeing Realty Corporation, 22833 S.EiBl~k Nugget Road, MC 7W-60, Issaquah, WA 98027,Atttcntion: Vice President Developmertt,. PhorieNo. 425-373-7550. . . With respect to (i) any such notice, consent, request, derrilll);d, appro~al, authorization or communication and (ii) any document or instrumentgivim or made ··. available to any Owner hereunder and which might concern an Occupant of such Owners' · · Lo.t,.it shall be the sole tespotislbility of such Owner (but in no event the responsibility of the Declarant) t?mak(' a copy thereof available in a timely manner to such Occupant. 4.4 No Waiver· . . . The failure to enforce any provision of this Declaration shall not constitute a waiver of the right lo thereafter enfoi:;e su.ch provision or t!IB ri$ht to enforce any other provision hereof. ' · · 4.5 Effect of Invalidation Each covenant, condition and restriction of this DeclarationJ~jnt~~dedto be, and shall be construed as, independent and severable·from eac:h other covenal)t;,;,ondition and restriction. If any covenant, condition or restriction of this Declaration is held tobt: invalid by any court, the invalidity of such covenant, condition or re-striction shall not affect the' validity of the remaining covenants, conditions and restrictiorishereof.· · · · · Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 8 of 15 4.6 No Discriminatory Restrictions No Owner or Occupant shall execute or cause to be recorded any instrument that imposes a restriction upon the sale, leasing, or occupancy of his Lot on the basis of race, sex, .. marital status, national ancestry, color or religion. 4.7 C:umulative Remecjies ·. · . . ··. .·: . Ead1remedy pr~~idcdfor jn this.Declaration shall be cumulative and not exclusive . . The failure to.exen;ise any rel)1e,:!y provided for in this Declaration shall not constitute a waiver ofsu<.'h remedy orofl!iiy othp"temedy provided herein or therein. 4.8 Attorfieys' Fees and Costs ... ·• If any Person. commences litigatiim for thejudicial i11t~rpretation or enforcement hereof, or for damages for the breach hereof the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court arid othercos!l,_ incumd, 4.9 Es!oppel Certificates At any time and from time to timewiJh.in twenty (20) days aft~r written notice or requcstby an Owner, Declarant at no cost or experise to the requesting party shall execute and deliver to any mortgagee, ground lessee or purchaser of th¢ Property a statement certifying that this Declaration is unmodified and in full force arid effect or if.there have beeh modifications that it is in full force and effect as modified in' the mannc;:r specified in the statement and·thatamong other things reasonably requested theie exists.no default under this Declarlition other than as may be specified therein. If Declarant fails to deliver any such statement within .. twenty (20) days after written notice or request by an Owner, and if Decliirant further fails to deliver Sl)ch statement within ten (10) days after a second written requ~t from an o:wner(which second written request shall specifically refer to the deemed estoppel under this Se\lttlllce)then it shall l,e conclusively deemed that there exists no default under this ~claratiort on the part of said Owner. '·:-. .,,' .-,", .,.,. :. : ·. 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS ·· a. Runs with Land. The burden and benefits bf~ c~~enants, conditions, easements and restrictions contained herein with respect to the Property; shall rnn with the land described in Exhibit A . The burdens and benefits of the covenants, conditions, easements, and restrictions contained h~rein with respect to the Retained Property, shall run with the land described in Exhibit B, P~OVIDED that for so long a,i° Thc Boeing Company is the owner of any part of the Retained Property, .The Boein,g {;ompany shall have the sole right to amend, modify, and enforce this Declaration, Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 9 of 15 b. Headings . Paragraph, Section and Article headings, where used in this Declaration, are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to be a part hereof or in any way to define, limit or describe the scope and intent of the particular provisions to which they refer. . c, Law. This Declaration shall be interpreted and enforced pursuant to the laws of · the State oJ Wa~hington, without reference to its choice of law rules. d. 'severability. )f.~ny.tenn or provision of this Declaration or the application . thereof to anypersonor circumstanci;:s shall to any extent be invalid and unenforceable, the remainCIBr of this.Declatati.<;>ri or t~e application of such term or provision to persons '(ir circumstancdother than those as·fo Which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affecte,I there))§, and each term and.pr6vi~fon of this Declaration shall be valid and shall be enforcedfo the exteiit pertnittedby law. e. Construction. This Dedaration s~aU be liberally c6nstrued in order to effectuate its purposes. f. Singular Includes Piurat Whenever the c6ntext of th1s Declaration requires, the singµIar shall include the plural, and vice versa, and the masculine shall include \\1e feminine and the neuter, and vice versa. · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has d~ly ~xecuted this De~laratiOll asof the day and year first herein~bove set forth. · · · · · THE BOEING COMPANY By: Colette M. Temmink Title: Authorized Signatory Renton lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 10 of 15 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OFKING } I c~~ifythat I know qr have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing .• before me at1d making this adu\owle()gment is the person whose true signature appears on this document..··· ·· · · ·· · ·· On this 2,7th lay of~~mbeti~Cl4before me personally appeared Colette M. Temminli;;°to foe known to 6e tlie Authorized Signatory of the corporation that executed the witlrin··and Joregoing)nstrurien( and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed ofsaiqcorporaJion, f9rthe uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he. was authorized to execute said instrunrent and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation,· written. WITNESS my hand artd official seal h;ret<i affixed th9. clay and year first above Jt,r~··~··y.af~ Notary Public ~d for the S.Latepf W,,ash.ington Residing at . ~ 1 AJ (L,. My commissionex~: ,25 . ---'f"u,,;;a_l'l ).. . 0,rn $',Ps-~r~ er [Type or Print Notary Name] · Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of Property . Lots 1, 2. 3, and 4, 13.ocing La)<,eshor~Landing, a Binding Site Plan, recorded under Recording . No. 20041223000$56; .. . Situate i11 the City of Rentoll, Couo!y~r K(ng,'Staieof Washington. . .-···-:,· -· ·: ·' ' Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page12of15 Parcel: 72230001 05 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of Retained Property 1·2 4&RENTQN FARM ACREAGE ADDALL LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 4 TGW VACAL.LEY ADJ TGW ALL .LOTS 1 THRU 58LK 3 OF SD PLATTGW VAC N 7TH ST(CALlFORNIA AVE) & VAC ALLEY ·· AOJTGW POR OF NW 114 OF SW 1/4 OFSEC 8·23·5 OAF· E 100 FT LY N OF CIL OF SON 7TH ST PROJ WLYi.ess N 60 FT THOF & L!!SS W.10 FTOF POR LY SLY OF N 300 FT THOFALSO LESS POR DESC UNDER AUDITOR FILE #3325235 • row POR OF SDNW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OAF· E 100 LY SOF C/1..0F SO NifH ST PROJ WLY~ESS 5 315ftTHOF & LESS W 10 FTTHOF (AKA LOT2 OF RENTON LLA#8-88 REC.#8811169001) • TGWPCL AOF RENTON SHORT PLAT #93-89REC #8911149006 SD SHQRT PLAT I)AF ·POR OF SO NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4BAAP OF INTSN OF NLY LN OF SDSUBD WITHNLY PRODUCTION OF\'iLYMGN OF PARK AVE NTH SLY ALG SD MGN AS PRODUCED TAP WCH 1$ 715FTN OF SLY l.N Of SD SUBD & THE TPOBTH W PLT & DIST OF 715 FT N OF SLN OF SD SUBD TO NLY PROD OF CIL OF fil::LL Y AVE (N PE:LL Y ST) TH SLY ALG SD PRODUCED C/L TAP ON NLYMGN OFN GfH ST (6TH AVE N) WCHlS 30 FT N OF C/L OF SD N 6TH STTH ELY ALG SD NLY MGNTO WLY M.GN OF SDP!1-RKAVE NTHNLY AL.G SD WLY MGN TO TPOB LESSS 185 FT OF E 107.50 FT LESS RO.:. . . Parcel:7223000115 3.4.5 4RENTON FARM ACREAGE ADD Parcel: 7564600055 ··· · .· • · · ·· · . · · 1 THRU 12 1 &SARTORISVILLE ADDLOTS 1 & 2 OF RENTON SHORT PLAT#282·79 REC #790710900,2 TGW LOTS 1 THRU 8 OF BLK 1 SO SARTORISVILLE AQD L.loSS ST TGWW 83.5 FT OF LOT 11 SD BL.KLESS N20 FT & TGW W 83.5 FT OF LOT 12 IN SO .BLK fGW LOTS 1 THAU 131N BLK11 OF RENTON FARM PLATLESS ST SD SHORT PLAT OAF ;LOTS1Mli-11c12 BLK 1 SD SARTORISVILLE AOD l,ESS W 83.80 FTLOT 12 AND LESS W 83.80 FT0f S 30 FT LOT 11 . .. ,• . Parcel: 7224000860 ..... . . 10Tl:IRU 1710RENTOlfFARM i>LATLESS E 90 FT OF FOLG N 30 FT LOT10 & LOTS 11 THRU 13 LESS SIS JGW POR VAC ALL.EV ADJOINING Parcel: 0823059152 .. · .. · . . . . 082305 152BET AT NXN OF.N LN OF NW 1/4 OFSW 1/4 WITH W LN OF PARK ST TH STO PT 715 FT N OF S LN OF SUBD Ttt W Tei N PROD OF.C/L OFPELLY ST THS TO PT 660 FT N OF S LN OF SUBDTH W TO PT 586 FT E OF NP R/W TONXN N PROD OF MAIN ST C/L TH S 630 FT TH W TO E LN OF NP R/WBELT LN TH N TO N LN -OF SUBD THE. TO BEG.LESS RD Parcel: 0823059209 . . PARCEL B OF CITY OF RENTONSHORT PLAT N093·89 FlECbROINGNO 8911149006 SD SHORT PLAT OAF· POR OF NW 114 OF SW 1/4 ·BAAP OF INTSN OFNLY LN OF SD.SUBWITH NLY PRODUCTION OFWLY MGNOF PARK AVENTi;-f SLY ALG SD M.GN A,$ PRODUCED TAP WCH IS 715 FT NOF SLY LN OF SD SUBD & THE TPOBTH W PL T & DIST OF 715 FT N OFSLN OF SD SUBD TO NL Y PROD OF C/L OF PELL Y AVE N PELL Y ST TH SLY ALG SD f>ROOUCED C/L TAP ON NLYMGN OF N 6TH ST 6TH AVE N WCHIS 30 FT N OFC(L OESD N 6TH ST TH ELY ALQ SD NLY MGNTOWLY MGN OF SD PARK AVE NTHNLY ALG SD WLY MGN TOTPO.B LESS$ 185 FTOF E 107.50 FT LESS RD . . . . Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 13of 15 . Parcel: 0823059019 , 082305 19PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 ·BEGIN INTSN OF W LINE OF PARK STWITH THE N LINE OF SIXTH AVE NTH N ALONG SAID W LINE 185 FTTH WEST 107.50 FEETTH SOUTH 185 FEETTH EAST 107.50 FT TO POB LESS PORTION TO CITY OF RENTONUNDER RECORDING NO ]206090448 &NO 9406070574 . · Parcel: 0823059187 082305187POR OF GOV LOT 1 IN NW, 1/4 DFSEC 08-23-05 TGW POR OFLAKE WASH SHORE . LANDS, BEG NE COR OFGOV L.OT fTHN 88-51-05 W ALG N LNOF GOV LOT 1 & ALG WL Y . PRODO.F SD LN 960:01 FT M/LTO WL YMGN OF ABANDONEDBURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY .R/WTH CONTG N 88-51-05 W 7$1.39.FTM/L TO EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT SD MONUMSNTBEINGAN ANGLE POINTQN NLY ,LN.()FSHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTYTH N 43·08°56 W 680..0G·FT MIL TO INNE!l AARBOR LN OF LAKEWASHINGTON SHORE LANDS THS 46-52-27 W 607.89 FT THS 43-06,,56 E 717.7:!FT Tp tPOB TH S 14-36·26 E; 741.50 FTTAP ON NWL Y MGN OF ABANDONl;DBURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY R/WTH S 50-51·48 W ALG SO ABANDONED R/W129.32 FTTH N 2Q-38·24W700;81 FTTH N 46·53·04 E 215 FTTH S 43·06-56 E TO TPOB PER CITY OF RENTOl't'LOT LINEADJNO 004-88 RECORDING N08808309006 : . ' : ' .. ,··"",•.,, . ·.·. Parcel: 0823059204 . .. .. . . . . ... .. 082305 204POR BN RR 100 FT R/W IN GL1 ·2·3 & NWJ/4 OF $W 1/4 OFS-23·5 & IN GL 1 & 2 OF 7. 23-5 ALL LY BTWN PROD OF N LN 6TH.AVE N & LNEXTNO SELY &_RAOIALL YTO TRACK C/L FR SUR STN 1068+00& LY SELY OF LN BAAP25 FT SELY ATR/1\,FR.SD STN.TH STRAIGHT SWLYTAP 25 FT NWLY MEAS FR SELY R/WLN ATS.UR STN 1074+00-tH SWLY TAPOt'fNWLY R/W LN & SEL Y-OF-SPUR TR STN 8+85.5 & TERM . Parcel: 0823059037 . 082305 37N 630.FT OF S 660 FT OF NW 1/40FSW 1/4 LY8ETCTR LNSOF PELLYAVE& MAIN ST PROD LESS RD• . . . ParG91: 0723059001 .. · . · . . .· 072305 1POR OF E 1/2 OF.SEC 7-23·05 L YEL Y OF CWW #2 & NL Y OF NJ,TH STIN .SE 1/4 OF SEC LESS NP R/W LESS ST TGW VAC LOGAN ST L YNWL Y OF LN 30 FT NWLY OF GOVMOR LN TGW 2ND CL SHLDS AQJSUBJ TO TWO 20 FT R/W ESMTS & POR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECBEG NXN S MGN OFN 6TH ST WITHW MGN LOGAN AVE TH SLY ALG SDST 995.34 FTTH S 89-18·45 W TO EL V. MGN CWW #2 TH N ALG SDMGN TO S MGN N 6TH ST TH E TO BEG LESS BEG NW COR THOF THSELY Al.G WL Y.LN 328.75 FT TH N 89-45-45 E 366.34 FT TH N00-14·15 W TO S MGN N 6TH SITH W TO BEG LESS 137.70 FT THOFTGW PORS OF NW 1/4 SEC 08-23·05 & SE 1/4 SEC 06- 23-05 & SW 1/4SEC 05-23-QS LY NWL Y OF NP WW& SWLY OF LN BEG NXN WLY EXT OFN LN OF GL 1 WITH W MGN SO .Fl/W TH W .163.39 FT: n,j N43·06-_56 W 680.06 FT Mil TOINNER HARBOR LN TH S 46-52-27 WALG SD LN 007.89 FTTO TPOB TH S.43<06-56 E 713.87 FT TH S46·53-04 W 215 FT TH S20-38-24 W TO NWL Y MGN SONPR/W SUBJ TO SO ;!OFT ESMTS LESS BN OPER STRIP AOJPOR OF SELY LN IN SD sec; 08-23,,-05LESS ST RD #7 TGW VAC LOGAN STLY NLY OF SPUR TRACKS TGW BLK C LK WASH SH .. LOS 3RD SUPPL Parcel: 0723059046 . . . · ,. .· . 072305 46BEG AT NXN OF S MGN OF 6THAVENWltH E MGN OF COM WW# 2 TH S13-29-00 E ALG SD E MGN 328.75 FT TH N 89-45-45 E PLLTO & 320 FTS O_F 6Tl'fAVE N366,3fFT TH N00-14· 15 W 320 FT TO S MGN OF6TH AVE NTH S 89-45·45 W ALG SD S MGl'-{493.02 l'T TO BEG Parcel: 0723059100 . . . . 072305100ABANDONED RR R/W OVER E 1/20F STR 07-23·05& W 1/2 OFSW 1/4 OF STR.08·23,05 LY BET N MGN OF NO 4TH ST & SOMGN NO 6TH ST Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs {Closing) 20041226 Page 14 of 15 . BUT EXCLUDING Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Boeing Lakeshore Landing, a Binding Site Plan, · recorded under Recording No. 20041223000856. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Renton Lakeshore Landing CCRs (Closing) 20041226 Page 15 of 15 i ' BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 /.l_QR,?,i";Ni"A[ UA !JM,_ z;z~1i6Nt·i~~';;; ·J~\J tt;2~~c~;.:i.,rs rf I,< ~O~"'"'''~ ~,.rs ;.:, 'cc' ,• • 1,<(.'~~MCN_'S s~,, ... ti. \\l"Ri '-'i'-"-~ '·" '"" n_Q< "~'"'°' 1,<(A>V~l:Mi:~ r ,,1•,'/'M~~ r -, ,..,,,..i;t_t .\l'lO C.PS "'OWCA a~C"( <TA/lO(iS "A~f ~<lV ,c,,P~prn ro ~.~D ~].<,~te:, •c••S"Sr A sc•Rvt' n.•llRA>U rl,;rc·v wrn·,, ,~, ;Vi' ·YcA~ r]c•~·~ ,· ', .. U!~C,<[T[ MOV•,•"~' ';// "~~~!Y ·,y ,~ "~"''' (,1, ;,,_,,,., , .J ac'.o•· 4,u,,4_ - •,• ',[~',ON '::Q~Nt~ ~ ·~J~''''~~ ~/5;:';~ ~6~r,(,j ,'i' ':' ~{!_0 ,, !,' ~ 1/i cc·.~, 1,-rrJB',JI;' R-5J5 l.x! L-10< ,.. I I ' ! -N89')7'Q4"..- ,DD<' 8/HDIHG SITE PL.AN SE 114 SECT 7. T\11/P. 23N. RGE 5E W.M SW 114 SECT 8, TWP 23 N. RGE 5E, 'N.M CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,: L~c <A arr: G' R(NiO-; ,~·-(16 U5' (CA ·'RtG · r,r,· 2ocrn~Nl'O:'Q;" ,~9·,~·in. ~F, "• VJY w ~,vm,, ,~~'!' :,;,~r~:c -'£'"'CR< MQIJl'l,<t'JTS t,i ,..;,-,.., ON .S~H '>~,WO J / 2~50<3" ('/< CD/< '/J C'I"' S[' I..OT5A 6'9.0~4 sq r, ·. ,'.~,:!1 oc,es '0 '~ ~L"<C"'" '•a ~,v;,~,, ,~ 0,1-sc N89L~'2J'W ' ' l ~---. ~ ' t:,·' " ~ .. I_ I ( ' 1 "'--t I 2'2'::.t 1J-:sf . 5 Cl ac --~-------· I, 1 ... r---.. -- ~ I l .. I re RI~ O~t 189G~ SM'2T<BT -~ ,, 6;h '.,! ~i..,'A-Cl-048--BSP 1.~·0-Js-0016 :111111111111111 20080111000854 cm~ ~NTON "'-"' \H ff i11.\1~,~j, BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BIND/HG SITE PLAH SE 1:4 SFCT l. TViP ?JN RGE SE. VII M SW 114 SECT 8. TWP 23 /Ii. RGE 5E. WM CITY OF RENTON, KJNG COUNTY, WASHINGTON RL".J,ri,1,· FNiM VOi 1l/.J7 5L'OC" 2 RECORD t'ASfM'NTS A,'JQ AGR(tM[J\'TS REFTRENC[S \}) .;~.\'?,' /IJ::c~~N ;;aPc ~,,.? -J56 11rc ~~ lQG· · n5,ma,,, 2 . <'i~OPD or ,vP•,t'Y .'jU8JC~OUJ ~.":"0~'D~' J!,'<tM, ,I: .. ~5X'H[S $ PlA! Of f?fNTO,.• FAR~ ACR[>C[ VOL 12 Of Pc,CS PG J7 • co· lWl ·~-~''"l"' cc•-oo~-1111 H[C IK! l!E1,16~DQ! 5 C""f"',;-,a:iN'..,.., <;H,')il' ,'[P ~~~·,nJ-~9. ~(~. ~o 89""9006 -c-" C"l'Y {JF Ht::N'!.)t/ C:GNfH()( >.Jr;N,Jl'f;Nl '8" <' > <" C)N(." l.i{J'I W/ ;'(!PP£_~ P,N cau~D rx·s rwG "DNU.,l:.N> W s~;l, A(.C/P'/D A; :f~'TP 0,- ,!C''o.l~' ~ l/J ; .,· 18.lll.iJ (:9~0 is'~",;.;; ~.:°.,t·•· ~') 8 ,o s~v, ,a,cc fAY'>l[N'. ',it'!,·~O 'j;J58~>.'r10T PLC PIO :1,%~;:,.;,;~/',~1',M/M'''u,· ,v ~i.;·1.,sw7•J,· SI'~'"·,,,,;,, !J'.;• lO'<Cf.0 u,~--~J 9 .t PO c·nufY .t s,o,w,c, ,,s,,..f.vr,, q,c ~t)~ J<J2>20 "' Ju1•,··~ •, ""f" H,£11£.,( R£( .w., J•Ji;u • • , "'Nt~A~ ~u,~vAn(/,'/ 8' P•c•nc co•sr ~-1,'(~0AD GOOl'A,~Y O[C ~o <60~5,«, (C 8 '°" :~; :;· ;~~:;;;~ ~:; ~:t~~~;: :~~ :~g ~:;~~:; /11<~,,,.,:,c,0, 'N'()""~·,o,, ·.-...,.o,v::wc.~: ·u 9.;·rc~~·~~ {vP v,) '5 '0 LJr/lrT• fASf>,jfr,•, ~EC ,·a 511,9;95 ·~. P(),>[1' EASE"lfl/T, R[C ND 62762Je :. ...• .: ,~ .!: '9 GAS [AS£"![~<';. RfC '<'05 ]Jlr290)9) ,o n15on5~; . . · 2G ''C>ltR FASE .. rn,: REC NC 7'0ll"~')J, ,;{")/ ewrrrn r,,._.,,..,,p (:,:~,;;Pf.~ QN .,.-1,.i~,,,u 'AC1,,/l!:, ,,~'Io~· (Ir ,u1 )~) ZP 1~ ~'lllff [A5£\;E/'<T Rff NO 77,~9070~91 Z2 ,o 2• l!J!L/rf E~sr .. t'1,;5, REC t10S. n,oorn.so,"' nwu,e::.,· .. "'"····.:. 25. ,a· AND JD' uncarr [ASEl;CNTS, ~EC. N(J '90/HJ(),';70 ("ACA~GN ORO ~i<!) ,", 26 PO..CR t•S£,.t:Nr. ~c NO ar072<056R. ~'or Honrn :,a· 5,R,,. (.t~•t~c~ ,,.~ A; .OC•·w "l"•,'"[S o,1 > •'-o• w •;o c, ~ '50 o• tvr lA) ZI PO~R [ASi"UD-1'. S'(C N() ~•1026069? .ir ~01<£,;-ux.-,,~·r. Rff NO a512rno9., .. · 5l PO\l'fR [AS( .. [Nr, R(C NO 85121609•9. "U' µ(~r/!LJ (;.oCffit'<W O"' A5-,0CP[O ?C,c:r;,:~) JJ UTiUIY [A5(.,(N1. R[C NO B~P}2JP6U. M0011".'l:D ~' ~!L' ":!. ~Wl!.'!/0'1/ J• ACCESS ANO ~AR•,NG (o,E.t(.VTS. ~c:;'. ~·~-s. B~On<N05 &c ~BOJ2JN22 55 POW£R [AS(Mf.,r. RfC N() BBO<IJ00~6' JB 5'0£WAL~ de (l~UTY f•stw;,n. RfC V:t u•oz•onJ. NOn' ,,:.H '" PAP~ ~-'[ N ~/---J9 un,1» ,.sr.,,,,r. R(C WJ. B~~}904cr(J •O ROAO~H SI.QPf <I! $'Of"'(~ [ASf.,(NT, RE~. ~0 B90B290•81 ''··'-'°"l'(Y (ASf"("'· P(C /./0 891P0)'0'7~ ,ii RfS»/i{;flCJ/./S. c,;,.o,,,ovs. 0[01("A1'~·s, l,JQlll", [AS0.4£Nf5 ANO PROV''ilO~'S 0,/ ~1·, Qr i<(.,'T/lN >,•OP' Pi A' ·"(J Ml·B9. ff[C ,c a1,P<9006 •J 7/.R ... S All[) PffO.<Si[)IJ5 CO/./TA/Ht.0 •N C!Rf i.lAiN /Nf[R-1'[ AC>i[f>l£,"7 9Ull'ff,S n.J[ 80£,NC CC,,,H~Y A~O 'l-ii: C,rY OF ff[,·fON, Pff NQ ;1052J>15~ (u(s TO NOR~, or ... rfRSfcnc::w ()F 8Tli ANO PAR<) (CJ0£~ NP •••rcr ,li~)<r;, ""0"l'"} /lit "t~"Off()I.[) ~""''" ·"'-'" NO 910(,060~~~! <-< P0"1:P E•SC"!f~1. fffC. NO Ql'{l7PJo60, •6 PO...-R (ASf•tl"~TS. ~n;. ND5. ~•"U052J .t '"'2J0706 P.-CO'll"NANTS, GOOD;no,,s_ ,rt5r,;o,cnoc» ·~[)/OR [ASfU[N'5 ,~ 00(.u"'·"' W:COP~O c,N(}Cff ~tc· N(} 9/s'J<~T<n. BllV~ • ff[-·lilCO/iO,N:; Ofi"'Rrc ·-:~o 9~•inoa.5~ · · :l8. COl'f:t/AN,S, co,.•o,no,,.5.'~5T'11cno,,5 AN0/01? /A'i<,.,(.-.J'S '~ sw:><!'0"' « N(}N-QPµO>IHON •GffH"tNf, R[C, NO 2000,11,ooo~J5 ·,9 covt'/IAN:-S. CONo,nd.,s. Rctrs-,~n::,,,s A~0/0,, tA~C .. !N'~. nc NO 20~Ql'1/0C,PJH (Fll>"S P~QPUUY) (OOtS l,JQf AfffCI 5i.18.f.CC F'ROPUC,) ;~ \!~svfc'J~;i~;: 1~~~~~,g:;~s A~~'.":A" ,/:~.c~t~J,. 7J,~~i",~. ~':J'c,.:?Li~~~~(\~':;(;,N;°i,i,;~~-~'i 2~ff ~J~~. ~ o~f:_JB},!_000 '~~ 7 Rrc ~o. no., n Joo,;l35s · ~J r.a.r ... ~cs. co,,wno,,s. ~rsw,cn,:ws'.i.l'jp/cR o,t:,.,£1<":.. R<~ NO 200"12600'6" ~< .'!R"S ANO ,'/?()'M•ONS CQNTA'NEC,)/1 "SIKANUt~ A~~(t.,t>IC' 8UW!'EN '>If !1'.J['~G ~()-,q-.JY •.>D r>I! C'l> JF ~r,,:~ ~f: NC· .w,IMl•2000IOJ2 !~CNC.•CR[S P/?('P(/?fY/ (~ocs:NC'I #T[(.'7 l"LIS.'[C' i',OC,,[R1'j l N -s-, 5CAL[ 'OC so :oo i-...._--I ( F[f' ; ',\'C>-' = 100 ;-r NO i'~OP(Rf< o~~CI?\ "'IL ai·,µ,ACW •; ~,,,, ,' ,~.s 81'/QIIIC ~,'I[ PlA~ OV( TC) mr~R£,U)~~rH',J(."0(.W "tJ'fl.l!J["" "ONS. ,·· ·o~c o· ,:,r:, sr o;:,,,~,~ a,·'"! .Ro[;,•c c:,,..,_.,~, BINQING SUE PLAN Ah'[A$ '" 20080111001220.:: After Recording Return to: ,::)trcu:5.hi L, .IL(_ Cirt/hl'lj. Ih G ;;;,-,t;i.3 </t!., ?I vJ. fut >-u• ti v0.A 1li0d-/ CLAIM OF LIEN Gran tor (Owner of property IL.-· Cc, u n d whose property is being liened): ~~~/?a~ 0 Grantee (Name oflien claimant): .:J--rLc("')hf Lin.£ .firtp11!). Th<:_ Abbreviated Legal Descrintion: ·.xc+.,-,., 8, ~ 'Uf?.;1.3""" A+,, Reins-5 (< ... "wtl. RIO<k2, ..• ): {::,J_~ . Assessor's' Property Tiu: Parcel/Account No.: {;7 ·di30S-1oaJ Notice is hereby given that the person named below claims a Lien pursuant to RCW Ch. 60.04. In support of this Lien, the following infonnation is submitted. l. 2. 3. 4. 5. Name of Lien Claimant: ()h..tu c../rf Lt ne Sfr .p I f}t< .[YL. • . Address: ,;z-3 41 .y qf4 p 1.vJ. ~-.;;:QI/ {;(..Vt Wo.:) ( Telephone Number: 'r<)-<;", !./.fr {p Y, luS Date on which the claimant began to perform labor, provide professional services, supply material or equipment or the date on which employee benefit contributions became due.· Ocf 1, 2.uo? Name of person or contractor indebted to claimant: r1 1 ;,,, .. ~ //) ,c '7'1~tn D . . , r h . h . h L . ,Oi1.1.lc:,{,, n?-. lO . escnpllon OJ I e property aga1ns1 w 1c a 1en 1s claimea: J . Nameoftheownerorreputedowner: 5YI/~ Co 6. The last date on which labor was performed; professional services were famished; contributions to an employee benefit plan were due; or material, or equipment was famished: Oct I '? ;}-00 7 7. Principal amount for which the Lien is claimed is:$ 1l ;;i,;;J...1. 70 8. If the claimant is the assignee of this claim so stale here: [gJ No D Yes. State name of Assignor: Appendix 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF /{LflD; ) ) ss. ) 20080111001220 ... ·. CLAIMANT'S ATTESTATION 1},rctn1-!1. IV\ of/', Tl-, being sworn, says: I am the claimant or a person authori:red to act on behalf of the claimant. I have read or heard the foregoing claim, read and know the contents thereof, and believe the same to be true and correct and thal the claim of lien is not ff o is made with reasonable cause, and is not clearly excessive under penalty of perjwy. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDfVIDUAL CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE On this day personally appeared before me ___ to me known to be the individual, or individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that the abo\<e claimant or person signing for said claimant signed the same as bis or her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of ___ , 200 __ . ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF Print Name: NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at My commission expires: CORPORA TE CLAIMANT'S SIGNA Tl/RE On this_ // ~ day of ./-,;<,uA~)', 2o_g.e before me personally appeared .kt:Jr#V Au-.o /1,ar~TT to me known to be the (president, vie<: president, secretary, treasurer, or other authorized ·officer or agent, as the case may be) of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath slated that he or she was authorired to cxcwte said instrument and that any seal affixed hereto is the corporate seal of said corporation. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this day. (Signature and title of officer with place of residence of notary public). Appendix 11 'A"'7A' 9'9' / ..... ,Y ,C-<,? c:;v,v,y ,p,/1:./h=8 20080111001 ??OC:cc: LEGAL DESCRIPTION POR SECS 7 & 18•23-5 & POR TOBINS O C INCL POR PLATIED & VAC STS LY WLY OF COMM WW# 2 N OF N LN DIXIE AVE & ELY OF STATE HWAY# 5& ELY & SLY OF FOLG LN BEG ON ELYMGN SO HWAYATPT 5 FT S OFN LN OF LOT 8 BLK 18 BRYN MAWR THE 89.23 FT TH N OS-16-51 E 438.90 FT TH N 40-09-47 E 188.55 FT TH N 60 FT TH N 25--00-40 W 197.07 FT TH S 88-27·28 E 90.83 FT TH N 01-32-32 W 40 FT TH S 88·27-28 E 234.53 FT TH S 35--00--00 E 142.41 FT THE 40a.70 FT LESS LOTS 19 TO 22 INCL BLK 4 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS 1ST ADD LSSS PORTION FOR LANE HANGAR CONDOMINIUM After Recording Return to: Linville Ursich PLLC Attn: David Linville 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3850 Seattle, WA 98104 20080118001094.:: 1111111111111111 20080118001094 LINVlLI.£ URSIC L 44, ff PRGl'.ffl OF IDQ 81/11/ztea 14:18 KING COUNTY, LIA AMENDED CLAIM OF LIEN Granlor: Grantee: Abbreviated Legal Description: Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Nos.: Original Recording No.: THE BOEING COMPANY STRAIGHT LINE STRIPING, INC. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS I AND 3 AND SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS!, 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FOR FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE A TT A CHM ENT A 07-2305-9001 08-8660-0050 08-8660-0060 08-8660-0190 20080111001220 Notice is hereby given that the person or company named below claims a lien pursuant to RCW 60.04. In support of the lien, the following information is submitted. I. Name of Lien Claimant: Address. Phone Number: Straight Line Striping, Inc. 23413 9th Place West Bothell, WA 98021 (425) 486-3765 2. Date on which the claimant began to perform labor, provide professional services, or supply material or equipment: October J ", 2007 20080118001 OS<l .-,.-. 3. Name of person or contractor indebted to claimant: Millennium Building Company, Inc. 4 Description of the property against which a Lien is claimed: IN THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 AND SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TIIE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FOR FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHMENT A 5. Name of the owner ar reputed owner: The Boeing Company 6. The last date on which labor was performed, professional services were furnished, or material or equipment was furnished: October 18'\ 2007 7. Principal amount for which the Lien is claimed is: $4,221.70 STA TE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ss. ) CLAIMANT'S VERIFICATION David E. Linville, being sworn, says: I am the claimant or attorney for the claimant above named; I have read or heard the foregoing claim, read and know the contents thereof, and believe the same to be true and correct and that Jhe claim uftien is not frivolous and is made with reasonable cause, and is IJOf clearly excessive under penalty of perJury ~ d AAAAt? David E. Linville, Attorney for Straight Line Striping, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDIVIDUAL CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE On this day personally appeared before me David E. Linville to me known to be the individual, or individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that the above claimant or person signing for said claimant signed the same as his or her free and v~ act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given un1rf»J:i'./~and and official seal this __\b"..:..:-day of January, 2008. ,,,, ..-.,...-1'' r.!'-R S,., ~ . ,, _..._..., .......... l ~- "' '0···~1ss1,. ,\,····.~_..),. ~ ,, /o'\ ·-~+'..{I'\"-' • (., 1'·,( ·; ..... ,('). -..., ~ .' ,') J.. "ji: I ~ ~ ; ...... m: ~ ,(I):~.,...,, (,o;' ~ ~ ~ (.,d 1 IC : ~ ~~\0 '-.: ,, "'-~ ·.J,,~ •() .. · ii:-,, _ ... , ..• r-1 ,. O ,, ~ O,c-.......... 0' ,1 ----WA s1-111"1 1,,,1 -"".,.,,,.,,/////fl Residing at: Seattle, WA My commission expires: 01-17-IO 20080118001094 '", ATIACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION .. 07-2305-9001 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS I AND J ANO SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS I, 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE j EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; ANO OF CH. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF BLOCK C. THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 5927582; AND OF CERTAIN SHORE LANDS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHOWN ON SHEETS J ANO 4 OF Tl!E MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 156371; AND OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD I (FORMERLY PARK STREET); AND OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC RAil.WAY (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY) RIGHT-OF-WAY -~ 08-8660-0050 LOT 5 BOEING LAKESHURE LANDfNG BSP LESS POR PER DEED 20061212000338 08-8660-0060 LOT 6 BOEfNG LAKESHORE LANDING BSP LESS POR PER DEED 20061212000338 ··-------- 08-8660-0190 LOT TRACT P BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING BSP ~ LESS POR PER DEED 20061212000338 ' l ,; .. ' ' -,z '·~ ,, ~ ' ' i ! ! • ; j a. 0,: ... i 11 ' i 3 ': ' ' I '. ---I i ~-. ' ' 2.YI Rl45-lllll nuu,.0, •=100,,.. ... w .... " " .... .... " .... " " " " ,,,., m, ,,,., "" u,o, .,,. ll'iOI on, lUOI - ll'OI '"' ll>Ot = l\OIUOUO " .,~, ':' 11,u 11 ·~ ':' ""' 10 "" = --~ ' ,, ,! ~Ii ' :1 ,_ i i ~ i;l --~ ------ lfl·H---4'.o; 1ui,,1~ Ht-21-U" ' ' ---_L LOT 5 ... ~H.} .... ="'11 "" ' ' ' l07\ ,. " ,:: - '"lltol!l 1oao, 000, 1100 1110 ' r-::-:=c..J j..~~ ~--· I "'° -! ! r--...;==__J ? ,i 5MO I "" " "" " "' n , ...... "~ .... ,re "" .... ....... , "~ .,,. '8IO 11 ow; --...... ".! ii ! 11 .., ••• "'" -=-- ' ' PO..A ,,,. ! ! i I ~ I PCL.B """ l-H ~ , .. -11 in.a !_ HOtllli'>1->0• " " ij;;;·Ji· 23 >Ul .... ~ "" .. ~ Lil,! M n-,u-u 1 " ,_ ,, ' :" " ' " L0111 .~I mf 1 - }c, ! .. ' ' z ~ I i l i ~ C " "' ' ., 1i ' ' " ' ' . ,. ' • ! , . 10 · 6 ' l •,, .,,, .. .. , ... " " " • ..,. ... '" ,, - --------,--. : I,' ;;;-0 0 : I,. 'Qo !·,1_, !I r,I_ r' ' •. f~'; I r;··J -~;/: "' -I I + ,'-=---- i -.~I· ---_l ·--.. ,. ''. . ·1·.i , .. cl":i,-S, ~,,------· ·-i.:::'"i"1, ...... -,.,r--J.:_-·, •• { ·0 i :1,t--~ !-,--• __ ,.-. ~ ·--: "" -. ·' -· -1-,, ,,, . "' ·r·,fl 1 i ! • -r;;-,:-: r---' I• • -= ' • • -• -';-,=: • ; , ",t--.1 l •;: __;;_ '1i C •'• = • I . --:-;.:.·:: :=(( ":':~ 0 (,) ' ,, --,, = :;;-· .. -• --.., . • _, • -~ ·a -· "'-~ c= ' .. ' '• • I ' '=-' , i-:..-'"-• • -~ --__ -__ 'I I .. __ -· • :: -!I! ~-:.-, • -·-· ,....,.,. -: • -I-"'-.... -_,..__ ,-'..-;: "7-"' "-.: -· ' r,-; ~ " . • -••r_ I-;;;,:;-'-,-• ,.:..,, =· ···= -'•, .. _ ·-· . ,. __ _ '· ·~ ~-J • """ :I,,: C .;, •,•; •. j ' c':'"~--,-• l---.---1, ••• ,., •• ,1. ,.: • ~-, "• -::-, . "; .~·--, 0 ·-•:;· ' • --t· -•_;;• ·-..... "t-_:11._'~-..--=:~:..: ~ -I :1 1 "-· .. _ I.•_'"';:. .. -~-,..._' ~1·L ··= ;-::, '···!, ·-: ! .:-= ':..c_'. """-~~.:.--;:-..;•.,-----,,--_1 l ~ i:ji ,;,(· ; "._j' ·-,. ·-· ~--~ i: ' . I • • •I' "'''·" • :' • ' ; • ----: • ,it, --·= . ~:~ -.~ . . .. .... ,-~ -~ .. = ,. = =· ·,. -• ,. ,. ·-~ ·-&· '·"=· ~ R r.,: -¥,~ . •. ·.E • -,:; ' .--:: -,. ·, ~-r:, =: c:---:': .. • ._:-,f/:, : ·-= ·--, . . ... r;;-= =·· \:J P,:::~ _.,... ,,.",:,f/; '•;:: •" , •• : -• : ;::; i ,.-. -:-g. ti~ ~=~-·-· -·-. = . ·--;·' ' :;. :. ;-;,;, . .. ~ _;;_• ,-~~-1:.1 -r.;;:--::--:·""a-Jr_:_;.__:i· ~ • -~ r-·= •-' ' --~ '/ • = -l!-,c r:--;;-,: .:: "-S --= •_;;: R., ... '·"= ~ ._..:." .. = ·....:::...· ~-•:.. ~ = • .. , . • r· -R -~,~ "!!-~t',, , • .,.--.r~ •-T= I ,-• • • '" l:.-=:.L" =. . . i ··"· ::-' • a: ".L' ·-· -., ·-· -.. • ... ·.: '' ~ r:: q • . •.. ·'· ~ __ .:_ ~ •• ·: .• ~: ~~ .. · .. -;_·::: i ,;..!,';.,fC. ~i • ~ 1.:;. ~ .~: h: ~- ·~ I-•=·'•=· ~·. : ... ;;; '= •~' •:...;; •' ;: • ... L "' ... ·--:::: _r_• -· -;:; c· " .--~ . ~ ~ --r-:-i:· 1! I I ' . ' i I r I ~I. I ' . " I -,.~ :iltf. .. =·~·· ...:.:.:· ---------_· " .... , ! ' ,_ FARM : o'ICREAGE RENTON -- ' < I '' I r' ,, -i\···I • I • ·" 'i .. ' ... ·-·----:,., ·-· ... ". r 0 ' \ l . I -I I ---- 1;11,..c-, ,I I I ()aplrt...._._ta • i I I ' ii . ' :, ' .. ·· I ' •• ~- ' ·1 , .. . 1=- -=::"""'"" -- I I if -- 1 0 ,t <co .~ LOT & • ii _.,, -. . .:.---· ,· . 'i; I . I = :, :, :, I :1 • I ,, • .. 'i .J' •-·..;;;.·;iii -- • w . = . = : -.. _;::: ' • -" r, :1 -... ,.-.· ., 0 .. -. /: '\t:::2: : : ~, ... I • ' ' -0 , .. -~-' . . --. 0 '"" . h--~-~--"---11 --:-- ··· ... -;,: --;ff>· -----.-.... ~ ---- ,• . . . -........... . .... .... , .;, __ RENTO~ FARM ACREAGE ' _, ,. G-- . -- SW 08-23-05 + .. ~ "::;, • •: ,, 0 l1 11 ' I I I I ,. ' i. . - .. '' 0 .. . - -~~--~~~ 'I • 1 .... 1~,. ! _J Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page File No.: NCS-356379-WA l c. I \ ~l ~. /.: I ', PLANNING DEVi~~"/,.'ENTON COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SEP 2 2 2008 RECElVED First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with ,ts By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company By: President Attest: /J1 ~ /__ /{~ Secretary By: YT~-Countersigned First American Tttle Insurance Company Fom1 WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-356379-WAl Page No. 1 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 (206)728-0400 -(800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348 To: Mike Cooper (206)615-3107 mcooper@firstam.com Boeing Realty Corporation P.O. Box 3707, M/C lF-58 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attn: Jeff Adelson SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: June 04, 2008 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: National Rate Extended Owner's Coverage $ Proposed Insured: To Follow AMOUNT To Follow $ Donna Koerber (206)615-3021 dkoerber@firstam.com File No.: NCS-356379-WAl Your Ref No.: Lot 7B Lakeshore PREMIUM TAX $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. First Amencan Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No.: NCS-356379-WAl Page No. 2 Lot 7B, Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2, a Binding Site Plan, recorded under Recording No. 20080111000854. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. First American Tttle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No: NCS-356379-WAl Page No. 3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, confiicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA~S (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 ( continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS File No.: NCS-356379-WAl Page No. 4 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%. Levy/Area Code: 2100 2. 10 foot wide Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: December 4, 1964 under Recording No. 5819195 In Favor of: City of Renton, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington For: Affects: construction, repair, service, and maintenance of sewage pipe lines and any other public utilities and services a Southwesterly portion of Lot 78 3. 10 foot wide Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: September 7, 1977 under Recording No. 7709070598 In Favor of: City of Renton, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington For: Affects: Public utilities (including water and sewer) with necessary appurtenances a Southwesterly portion of Lot 78 4. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 13, 1992 under Recording No. 9207130661 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation For: the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and enlargement of an electric transmission/ distribution substation and one or more electric transmission and/or distribution lines. Affects: an Easterly portion of Lot 78 5. 10 foot by 25 foot Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 22, 1994 and November 23, 1994 under Recording Nos. 9411220523 and 9411230706 In Favor of: For: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and enlargement of an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system together with all necessary or cnvenient appurtenances. a Westerly portion of Lot 78 A'rst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment 6. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: File No.: NCS-356379-WAI Page No. 5 Recording Information: May 21, 1979 under Recording No. 7905210642 In Favor of: The City of Renton For: Utilities Affects: the North half of vacated N. 7th Street First American 77tle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Comrrntrnent INFORMATIONAL NOTES File No.: NCS-3S6379-WA1 Page No. 6 A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. C. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. Lot 7B, Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2, Rec. No. 20080111000854 APN: 088661-0070-00 Taxes for the Year 2008 have been paid in full. D. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment ~. I \ \l /-I'. I , ,_ ' , '~ ;-----~ First American Title Insurance Company National Commerdaf Setvices COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations Fde No; NCS 356379-WAl Page No. 7 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is preJudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment The First American Corporation First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Infonnation File No.: NCS-355379-WAl Page No. 8 In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us w1th certain infonnation. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal inforn1ation you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Polley to govern the use and handling of your personal infonnation. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the 1nforrnat1on which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as infom1at1on obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal infonnation regardless of its source. First American calls t:nese guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www .firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our servtces you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, fonns and m other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and· • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, howe-...-er, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationshlp has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty msurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we rnay also provide all the mfoITT1at1on we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial inst1tut1ons with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Fonner Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privaq Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to tram and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain phys1cal, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. c 2001 rhe First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved First American Title Insurance Company £ 10 foot 1ltil.Ut ~ Offl' a p:nial of b II u\ 100 f..t, Of Ulill ~t. oat..qllll'ttl" ot tbt aiuUner1, OOl-qw'WJ' ot s.cticm i, towahlf !) lorth, kqio S Ent, V, M. J 1&1,1 p<ri1a> btu,, dol<r\btd u t.U-, 'lM ,01!.t.ba:lr 10 fHt Gf the DCIC'\.berq' )0 fN\. of thl produeti.Oll. vuterlJ of 7th J.-.m» liortb · {Cuifond.11 Anin ucordi.n,g to the pl&\ rocOf-ded in Voliaa 2 0:t thte, Pl&• )11 .Rtcordl of llnc Cowtt.7, Vu.hhct,oa.) Allld Ula ,-.rl.f or \M l9CICIM pe.rt to h~,, lor !.l'lt ~~ ~ l'fflUI', lff'lka, u4 .,t.1,~ce ~ ar~ pipe ~ Uld an1 otbtr plll>l:le 111iU1.kf u,d lffTkq DI vmr1'll& 'l'lfllttQf Ult~ putle..l ~Tt bem,a\o llri lbt!J' haMI UICI IWI lbll let lb7 ot' au:rr or u.amrotolf , Can'TT a, ltDla f II, -·-. -ptrwn,.UJ ' Ml. __ .41ll,a .. J •. i.n-,.... .. ' 11M ttM 1114h'1"ilil NICftbtf la 164 no~ tlll ... u \bar int IAd tlllmtVJ" Kl IIICl'Pl*'l blr* -~ 11111 ~ -i U.11. .. ---.ll\ .... ------------------------------- -, ._, ;: . .? ~ 0 'O I ,, ,:, 0 ,- a C' C) -! """ 0- ' " ' t er a a I';'= ,-. I ~ ~ ..... • - THIS !NSTRUIIENT, Nde th1s _.ll_dlf of __ _,,A.,u,.gu,-s"'t,.._ ______ 191Z_: by ind between Harry H Torrens 1nd_~At>!la.1Jit"'•LY:,.,,,_ILP1Lri:::r:e""n-"s'------- _________________ and, ____________ _ -----------------•nd, _____________ _ -----------------•nd. _____________ _ her,11\lfter called "Grantor(s),· ind the CITY OF RENTON, a Mun1clp1l Corporation of K1ng County, Washington, heretn1fter c1lli:d 11 Cr1nt.ee." WITNESSH!f: That said Gr1ntor(s). for ind in considerition of the S\IR of t · • r --=====::=::"::-:::::;:::;:::_JP• id by Grantee, and other va 1 uab 1 e cons ldernii,,;;:::.o by thise presents, grant, bargain, sell. convey, and warrant unto the s1id Grantee, its succe-ssors ind 11si911s, 1n easement for public utilities (including WAter ind stwer) w1th necessary appurtenances over, thn,ugh, acn,ss ind upon the following described property In King County, Washington, aore partlcul1rly described•• foll.ows: A 10 foot utiHty easement over a portion of the east 100 feet of the northwest one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section e,· Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M.; said portion belng described as follows: The southerly, 10 feet of the northerly 20 feet of the production westerly of 7th Avenue North (California Avenue according to ttie plat recorded in Volume 2 of plats, page 37, ReC::ords of King County, Washington) Su 7 9 34 ~:i'ii Together with• teaporary constn1ctfon eGs!Slent described as: S1id teiqparary ccn$trJct1an euemer,t sha11 reufn in force during construe• t1on and until such time as the utt11tfes ind ~pp~rtenances have been accepted for the1g~ratton and matnten1nc~ by the Grantee but not hter than November l r Said heretofore rrentfoned grantee, its successors or assigns, shall have tile r1ght, w1thout prior not1ce or procttdlng at 1..,, at such t11'1!s as NY be necessary to enter 14>on said above described property for the puri:'lose of construct· fog, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said roaQiriay and utilities, or 1n11:.1ng any connectiorts therewith I w1 thout incurring any legal obl 1 gat1<ms or a:, lta:bilfty therefore, provided, that such construction. 11aintainin9, repairing, f!::: altering or l'tconitructtoo of said roadway and •ti11ties shall be accoq,11shed 1n w, s•ch • ..anner that the prhate i"l'ro,elll!nts existing in the r1ght(s)-of-way ,hall f2 not be d1sturbed or d111a9"d, they will be l'tploced tn as good• condtt1on as they o were 1ml!diately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. ~ f2 I'- The Grantor shill fully use and enjoy the aforedescr1bed premises, including the right to retain the right to •Se the su,·face of sold r1ght-of..,.ay if such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the roadway or utilities. However, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over, 1.1\der or across the r1ght-of-way dur1ng the existence of such roadway and utiltt1es. Th1s ease .. nt, shall be a covenant rooning w1th the land and shall be l>ind- ing on the Grantor, his successors. heirs and assigns. Grantors c;ovenant thit they are the hwful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful r1gt,t elCl!cute th1s agree,.,nt. ~ . / ________, 7;1~ :: .~z r /~,, STAT( Of WASHlftGTI.JI CMTY Of Kl"G ss 1, the. \l\dersiC}'led, a notary pub\ic in a.nd for the State of Washington. hereby cert1fy that an this ll_day of AUqust 197.1_ personally appeared before "' 11\d HARRY H. TORIU!NS ANITA V. TORRENS •nd---------~-------------~~--~--and ind--------------; to• known to be lndh1dual(s) described In and olio ••cuted the foregoing fnstr....,nt, and admowledijed th•t -1.!!l!a.v,"""-~--- si!J'ed and 5Hled the SiJle as their fre'! and volwwtary act tnd deedfor the uses 1nd purposes there1n ,ent1oned. "°ury '"""'' ,c !~.;~or me Stlte ,tf.. Wasf'l~ngton, resp:, at Auburn · 1 , ·, < • • • t. Thia ~~t granted t~ enable H,R, M&l~tro to se't'Vice new apartacnt cosplex at 6th and Wella, Ha.etro ha& received•• C01U1ideration fraa Torrent the SU11 of $4,600.00 and Telieve.1 TorTena, hie aucceeeors or aas1.gn.e of any further charge for vate.r .. ln installation v1th respe<:t .., ._ rou-s.a 1-11J'_~-~~·-________ _ Tiu< Lot 11, l!!m •. torrw) The East 100 f""t'of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 8, Township 23 N, R. SE. W.M,, EXCEPT the South 635 feet thereof, and EXCEPT the North JOO feet thereof • .. Tax Lot U9 (Tel The East 100 feet 1/ 4 of Section 8, TownsbJ.o 23 N, R. EXCEPT tile South 315 feet the · and EXCEPT that portion ,g;J>ereof ly erly of the W..sterly production of the lbrtb line o.r laot .,i., Block 4, Renton Para Acreage, according to the plat tbereoi" tecorded in vol of plats, pg , recorda of King COwity. All situated-.:;;--ifing County. washington. ··-----·------------------------~-•- ,;'. • I ! / STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) )H • ) < '· Qn, ··tbia day pe.rsonally appeared before me K,&, Mastro and Joan K. Masti-u ·• r .. ·'to Ill! knovn to be the individuals described in and who executed the with- in and foregoia.g instnment, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, fot the use• and purposes therein ~tiooed. GIVEN under-, band and official seal this 24th day of august, 1977. Notary Pcblic lo ~r the s\.ate of Wuhington reeiding at ~ The City of Renton. aclr:novledgee this transaction between Torrens and Mastro and conaider the lateeoaer1 ~greea!llt inoperative with respect to the two legally described properties ovoed by Kr. Torrens. CITY'~~ By.·/~- ' I ! ' I ' I j flUD ror "-nrd a Aecaietr t -4hffa,w onn or 1111! ~ -.. MNmN WDSMVMt,Q\i'XI •IIILLAV£. lswr, rw z .. --· ~-----·-- ( ---- j ' ' l I J . ' ; ' ' ' ORIGINAL EASEMENT For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considei:-ation, the receipt of which is heceby acknowledged, THE UOEING COMPANY, a Delaware cor:-por<1tion, ("Grantor" herein), hereby grants and conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ( "Puget" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth a nonexclusive perpetual easement, over, across and under the following described real property {the "Propei::-ty"): See Exhibits C-1 through C-9 Inclusive 1. Purpose. Puget shall have the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an electric: tr-ansmission/distribution substations and one or more electric transmission and/or distribution lines, over, underr and upon Property together with all necessary or convenient apurtenances OF: ... ,. ...0 thereto, which may include but are not limited to tho following: -I) 0 (") Transformers, power circuit breakers, and other electrical equipment. Concrete foundation pads. Overhead transmission and/or distribution lines including poles and/or towers with switches, crossarms, braces, guys and anchors. Underground transmission oc distribution lines including conduits, cables, vaults, switches, and manholes. Overhead and/or underground communication and signal lines. Access roads. Security fencing, retaining walls and rockeries. Landscaping and ir"rigation systems. Drainage and wateL retention facilities, Control house. FibeL optics. Ir, EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ! Kin~__Go;fecords Di¥"r.iion 8y 0.)11 a f _)Q , Deput1 2, Clearing, Grading and Maintenance, Puget shall hthe right to cut and remove or otherwise dispose of any and all brush and trees presently existing upon the Property. Puget shall also have the right to contcol, on a continuing basis and by any prudent and reasonable means, the establishment and growth of trees, brush and other vegetation upon the Property which could, in the opinion of Puget, interfere with the exercise of Puget's rights he('ein oi:-create a hazard to Puget's facilities. Puget shall dlso have the right to excavate the property and modify the contour of the land to the limited extent necessary to construct an electrical substation. 3. Compliance with Laws and Rules, Puget shall at all times exerclse its rights herGin in accordance with the requirements (as fcom time to time amended) and all applicable statutes, order-s 1 rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. 4. f;xclusive Occupation. Puget shall have the exclusive right oE occupation of the ~High Side" portion of the fenced substation and no other party, including Grantor, shall have the right to enter upon or occupy that portion of the substation without prior written notice to and permission from Puget. Granto!:' shall not grant or convey rights of any kind to any third party for use of the "!liqh Side" without prior written approval and consent from Pug~t. Granter shall have the exclusive right of occupation of the "Low Side" por:-tion of the fenced substation and no othei: party, including Puget, shall have the right to enter upon or occupy that portion of the substation without prior written notice to and permission from Granter. Ho...,,evcr 1 that in the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by Puget and/or Grantor for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, Puget and/or Grantor may take ::;uch action upon such notice to Puget and/or Granter as is -1- (\ l'-5] ") ca 901':j /jc_0,1_ KJ 9 DC 1552 .. \ i 1, i ., ~ • i ., ,-.~ i\~ '·" :~ ii '' :I, ' ' ' .. reasonable under the circumstances. 5, Puget's Use and Activities. Puget shall exercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize, and avoid if reasonably possible, in terf erencc w l th Gran tor I s use of the Pcopcrty as set forth in Paragraph 6, h~rcin, 6. Cran tor's Use of the Property and Access by Granter During Cons tr.uct ion. Gran tor reserves the right to use that port ion of the Property outsido of the fenced substation (the "Unfenced Area"} for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein gi:-antcd, including, but not limited to, parking and roadway. Provided, however, that Gran tor shall not construct or maintain any building or other stt"ucture within the Unfenced Aroa ar.d that no blasting shall be done within fifteen (15) feet of the Fenced Area. At no time shall Puget's access to and along the Unfenced Area be blocked off or unduly restricted. Puget shall make provisions satisfactory to Granter for continued access by Granter along, over and across the Property during periods in which Puget is conducting construction or other activities. In the event of an emergency requiring irnmedia:te action by PLiget and/or Granter for the protection of ita (acilities or other per.sons or property, Puget and/or Granter may take such action upon such notice to Puget and/or Gr.:rntor as is reasonable under the circumstances. 7. Indemnity. By accepting th~ recording of this easement, Puget agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from any and all claims for damages, expenses, actions ,:rnd claims, including costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incut"red by Grantor in defense therE:of, asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of~acts or omissions of Puget and Puget's servants, agents, employees and contractors in the exercise of the rights granted het"ein: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Pu ct shall not be responsible to Granter for an damages u ng ram 1nJur1es to any person caused y...,acts or om ss1om:; of Gcantor. l '''----------------------1[!::'S\r3.;;~ '----~ 8. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time a5 Puget ceases to use said property for a pec-iod of five {5} successive years, in which e~e11t this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shall t"{JVert to Granter, provided, th~t no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Pugot 1 s failure to initially install its facilities on the Property within a:ny pe~iod of time from the date hereof. 9. Notices. Notices t"equired to be in writing under this Agreement shall be given as follows: To Granter: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group divigion of To Puget: THE BOEING COMPANY, Attention: Facilities Director Phone; 237-8381 Puget Sound Power & Light Company Renton Service Center Phone: 255-2464 Notices shall be deemed effective, if mailed, upon the second day following deposit thereof in the United States Hails, postage or upon delilfery thereof if otherwise given, Either party may change the address to which notices may be given by giving notice as above provided, 10. Access. Puget shall have the right of reasonable access to the Property over and across adjacent lands owned by Gr-antor to enable Puget to exercise its rights hereunder-, pr-ovided that Puget shall compensate Grantor for any damage to the Property caused by tho exer-cise of said eight of access. 11. Successoc.-s and Assi~ The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the· -benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. -2- 9 DC 3552 .. • I = PUGET: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation • 19_ GRANTOR: B'f: BY: ITS: Director Real 8state STATE OP WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 'l-7m day of l'tr, , !97~before me the undersigned p~ally appe~ed~ ~ to me known to be the ~,rus:/;_ tl, i? -""'i::C: 'b'.& ~ resp 1vely, of B9Blli8 --€Ol11!5HEIM.MRN.A!Hi l;ooi;p,J(v-Jo4<i~ of THE BOEING COMPANY, the :2 corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and CJ acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act ("") and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposea therein ,._ mentioned, and on oath stated that ho authorized to execut~ the C) said inst~ument. N l1' STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) n and for t~t~ residing at ~~ expires ~?~--'~----~7~:f~ On this day of , 19 __ , befor-e me the undersigned personally appeared to mo known to be the Director Real Estate of PUGET SOUND POl,'ER &: L-IGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said inatrumont to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for tha uses and purposes therein ~entioned, and on oath stated that is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first ~hove written. Notary Public 1n and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires -3- 9 DC 3552 .. • I ESMinc. u RE.CE.Wf..0 t,lll.'I o :J 1991 SEC ENGINEERS A CIVIL (NGlNHRING, LAND SURVEY, /\ND rROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING flRM Boeing/Renton Easements ,Job Ho~ 424-10~910 May 2 1 1991 D.lfl UIT LEGAL D£SC~IPTI0N FOR THE POGET POWER PORTION OF S0Il8TnTION NO. l That portion of the Northwest quarter of Section a, Township 23 North, Range 5 E3st, W.M., city of Renton_ King County, Washington, JDore particularly described as follows! COMMENCI~G at an existing monument on Park Avenue North shown as P.C. A 0+00 on the 'A' Line on Sheet 2 of 5 of the Washington State Department of Highway Plans for 11 PSH 1 (SR 405j North Renton Interchange11 as approved April 27, 1965; THENCE N 22·22 1 oa 11 E, 418.34 feet to an existing monument shewn as P.T. A 4+28.33 on said plans; THENCE S 7o•ss 1 29 11 w, 198.52 feet to the 'l'RUE POINT OF BEGINtl!NG~ THENCE N 10"52'51 11 E, 38.84 feet; THENCE N 39"24'56 11 w, 66.28 feet; THENCE s 97·01 1 57 11 w, lJ.t.7 feet; THENCE s 50"44 1 54 11 w, 40.52 feet; THENCE s 39"19 1 3011 E, 32.SO feet; THENCE s 32'09'47" w, 19.91 feet; THENCE s 39"19'30" E, 10.50 feet; THENCE N 50'2B'J0 11 E, 4 o. 51 feet to the TRUE BEGINNING. Containing 0,.1.13 acres (4,943 square feet), See attached Exhibit "A". Written Py: C.A.G. Checked by: R,S,M, 18:129 941 l'owC'll A\'cnuc 5.W . .Suite iOO Rt'm,:,n, W.11!,ini;ton, 96055 POINT OF C·l • I I I I i .. • I "" EXHIBIT II A" TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THAT PORTION OF SUBSfATION NO. 1 TO BE CONVEYED TO PUGET POWER A PORTION OF THE tlW 1/4 OF SECTION B, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M., ClTY OF FIENlON. l<lNG COUNTY, WASHINGTOtl w EXISTING 7' HlCH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH OVERHEAD QI.RB WIRE AS LOCATED ON 04-26-91 HORIZONTAL DAllJM: OWNERSHIP MAPS BY HORTON DENNIS ANO ASSOCIATES, INC, FOR THE BOEJ/IIG RENTON PLANT fACIUTIES, BOEING JOB NO. J56293, OR.,1.WING NO. S-0071 DATED MA't 12, 1980 (HOA. INC. JOB NO. 4~J90) EX1STINC MONUMENT, SHOWN AS P.C. A o+oc ON ll!£ •A• UNE ON SHEET 2 OF 5 OF W,S.D.H. flLANS FOR •p511 1 (SR 405} NORrn RENTON IITTERCI-WIGE"' AS APPROVED APRIL 27, 1965 JOB NO. 424-01-910 DATE 05-02-91 DRAWN CAG. CHECKED ; RSt.l DRAWING NAME : EXH-A-0 SHEET 1 Of 1 t.XIST1NG MONVMfHT. SHGWN >S P.T. A 4+2fLl3 O:l THE • A" LINE ON SHEE;T 2 OF S OF W.S.D.H, PLANS FOR •psH 1 (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTE"RCHANGE;" AS APPROVED APRIL 27, 1065 -----I / I I TRUE: POltfr Of' / / 8l::GINNING / I 1i I I I I I I L)\ I I " D SCALE: 1" • 60' ESII inc. ·--------- U 1 POWllJ. ... 'IOWt: s.w.. S>J/1"[ 1 00 ll(l,(Tl)fl, -...:;><itiO'l'Ow IIIIIO~ PHQool~ (lot] :Ua--Mu • .• • I - ::; .0 _, " ' _, -.D EXHIBIT C], PAGE l ESMinc. A. CIVIL ENGIN!:{RINC, VIND SURV[V, A.NDPROJKT M"NA.GfM[NT CONSULTING ffRM Boeing/Renton ta.scruents Job No. 424-10-910 Revised Huy 24, 1991 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TRE1PUGET POW&R PORTION OF SUBSTATION NO. 2 t'f..lf/BIT C. • Z That portion o! the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,':}l,M., City of Renton, King county, Washington, more partialfdarly described as follow~: COMMENCING at an existini] monument on Park Avenue North shown as P.C. A o+oo on .the 'A' Line on Sheet 2 of 5 of the Washington State Department of Highway Plans for 1'PSH 1 (SR 405) North Renton Interchange" as approved April 27, 1965; ....0 THENCE N 22·22 1 08 11 E, 418. J4 feet to an existing monument g shown as P.T. A 4+28.33 tin said plans; Or-THENCE S 31*30'23 11 W, 29'112.93 feet to the TRlJE POINT OF N BEGINNING; U' THENCE N 89.11'59'1 W, 44~00 feet; THENCE N 00"27')8" E, 15. 53 feet; THENCE S 89"32 1 22 11 E, 3.60 feet; THENCE N 00"27'38'1 E, 112:.00 feet; lff{ENCE S 89"'12'52 11 E, 40U.50 feet; THENCE S 00"7.7'J8" W, lSE".91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. containing 0.14J acres {6,240 square feet), more or less. See attached Exhibit Written by: C.A.G. Checked by: R.S.M. 18, l4 0 9-41 Pawell "~criuc ~.W. ~uiie-100 "G":.:' Rcn10n, Washi'1gwn, 980SS (206) 228·5628 .• • ... • EXHIBIT Cl, PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "G" TO ACCOMPANY l£GAL DESCRIPTION FOR THAT PORTION OF SUBSTATION NO. 2 TO BE CONVEYED TO PUGET POWER A PORTION Of THE SE 1/4 or SECTION 7, TWP. 2J N., RGE. 5 E., W)J,, CITY OF RENTON, K1f1C COUNTY, WASHlNGTON £X1STING MONUME'.NT. 5H!)WN AS P.T. A 4-+-28.JJ ON THE • 1.; UN£ ON SHEO 2 OF 5 OF W,S.0.H. PLAN5 FOR ·psH 1 (SR '405) NORTH RENl'ON INTERCHANGE" A5 APPROVED APRIL 27, 1965 I /J II I I I; /; I, -<l -1) 0 C') I'-- 0 ('J CJ', l.,w S",'i/.:.. EXrsnNG ,. HIGH OWN LINK f"ENC( WITH OVERHEAD BARB WIRE ON A (j' WIO[ CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AS LOCATfD ON 05-23-'J 1 s a·:r-1-rsl' ' 40.50' 11.,, ~ S/./<-ID N ~ ~ n w b a \o I I I I I I I I I ll ;j I. " D .. I/ /1,, o~~ I /·$ ,..,2/; f I } \o 0~<,,:, " n "0· N ~ .:>o N b c~,;" a 0 0 z S 89"32'22" E J.50" ~ "' N OCT27'J8" .E_,. ___ 1 1 s.sJ · -1<--_.,.__, __ .... _.a~a-·_,___ N a9·11·59• W EXISTING !.IONUME}IT, SHOWN AS P.C .... 0+00 ON TH£ "A" LINE ON SHEET 2 OF 5 OF W.S.0.H, Pl.AN'3 FOR ~PSH 1 (SR 40S} NORTH RENTON iNTE:RCl-i,lJ<IGt AS APPROVED APRJL :?7. 1!165 JOB NO. 42"-10-910 DATE: ; 05-24-91 OR>.WN : CAC. CHECKED RSI.I QRAV,1NC NAME: D'.H-G SHEET ! Of 1 I I I I mvE POINT OF BEGINNING SCALE: 1" ~ 50' I I I HORIZONTAL DA TUM: OWNERSHIP M,t,PS BY HORTON D0.NIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC, r;oR TI-fE BOElNG RENTON PLANT F...CIUllES, BOEING J08 NO. J5629J, DRAWING NO, 5-0071 DATED MAY 12, 1980 (HOA, INC. JOB NO. «J90) ESM inc. ·--------- ... I l'OwtlJ. AVDIIJ( s..w .• :rum; IQO llt/olTO>t. -Of,CTQN t«t!:1, ll'WQHt. po1J :Ul-6UII , ··--···-__ ,.--.,·:,-----· ·-----·- .. ' • • -ilEXlHBIT CJ, PAGE l RECE!\!ED \ - l,I~~ o 3 1991 \ aEC ENGINEERS I ESMinc. A. CIVIL ENGCNHRING, ll\ND SURVEY • .A.NO PROJECT MA.Ni'IC.EMfNT CONSULTING FIRM Doeing/Renton Easements Job No, 424-10-910 May 2, 1991 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR POWSR LIIIE EASEMENT e..Y.Jf-/5/T C-.J That portio~ of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., city of Renton, King county, Washington, being a JO foot wide strip of land, lying 15 f~et on each side of the following described. centerlir,e: COMMENCI~G at an existing monument on Park Avenue North shown as P.C. A o+oo on the 'A' Line on Sheet 2 of 5 of the Washington State Department of Highway Plans for "PSH 1 ( SR 4 OS} North Renton Interchange" as approved April 27, 1965; THENCE N 22 • 22 '00 11 E, 418. 34 feet to an existing monument shown as P.T. A 4+29.JJ on said plans; THENCE N 86'50'43 11 W, 248.BO feet to a line which bea~s H so•44i54•1 E, and the TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE N 39•1s 1 05 11 w, 29.82 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly Poundary of Farcel r-ao of the Boeing Comr.iercial Airplane Company-Renton Plan Facility, being a line which bears N 49•53'02 11 E and the end of this centerline description. See attached Exhibit 11 0 11 • Written by: C.A.G. Checked by: R.S.M. l8:lJ2 ~l Powell AVC'ITUC 5.W. Suire 100 Rt'nton, W.;ishin;1on, 9tl0SS {206) 226-S62B .• • I • • EXHIBIT "D" TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR POWER f.ASMENT AT SUBSTATION NO, 1 A PORTION Of mE lfW 1/4 OF SECTION a, TWP. 2J N., RGE. 5 E.. 'NJ~., CITY OF' RENTON, KING CDUNlY, WASHINGTON JO' POWER EAsEMENT (15' [!\CH S!OE OF CE'.NTERUNE) CL .. N 39" 1 S'06"W ,!9.82' TRUE PO!NT OF BEGINNING EXHIBIT CJ, PAGE 2 EX1Sm1c MONUt.lENT, SHOWN I "5 P.T. A '4+28 . .)3 ON T11E "A" LINE ON Sl-i£CT 2 Of 5 Of W.S.D,H. Pl.ANS fOR "PSH 1 (SR i05) NORTH RENTON JNTfRCHANGE' J,s APPRO\l'ED APRIL 27, Hl65 ~ ~0'4".J" w 21a.ao• --- EXISTING 7' HIGH CHAIN/ / UNK FENC[ WrTH OVERHfAD E!ARe WIRE AS LOCATED ON 04-26-91 HOAIZOITT Al. DA 1\JM: OWNERSHIP MAPS BY HORTON oomrs AND .4SSOCIAT(S, INC. FOR TI-iE BOEING RENTON PL.A.NT fACIUTI£S, BOEING JOB NO. J5629J, DRAWING NO. S-0071 DATED MAY 12, BB0 (HOA, INC. JOB NO. 4'4390) £X1smm MONUMENT, SHOWN AS P.C. A 0+00 ON THE s A• UNE ON SHEET 2 OF 5 Of w.s.o.H. PlANS FOR 'PSH 1 (SR 405} NORTH RENTON INTERCHANG£" AS N'PROY[D APRIL 27, 1965 JOB NO. 424-01-910 DAT£ : 05-02-91 DRAWN : CAG, CHECKED : RSM ORAWINC NAME : EJCH-A-0 SHEET 1 OF 1 n SCALE: 1" " 60' ES!,{ inc. ·--.... ------ • ., ~ ... vtNUI; II."~ ,vm: 1QO flOflOH, 111110.Sl'•Ur,'OTON 980~,S ~(; (~IHJ 2211-HJII ' ----' ' • ,, • I ' • lY.HIBIT C-4- Guy Stub Anchor Easement t4 An easement for guy ctub anchoring purposes over, under, and acrosa a portion of LOt 4, Block 3, Renton Farm Acreage as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats on pago 37, Records of King county, Washington, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said lot 4; thence North 1·05 1 34 11 East along the east 1 ine thereof 103. 60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88"54 '26" West a distance of 18.00 feet; thence North 1 •05 1 34 11 East a distance of 10.00 feeti thence south ea• 54 '26" East a clistilnce of 18. 00 feet to the east line of said lot; thence south 1 •os•34o West a distance of 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 180 square feet. 91570/4 W.o. No. 9009044 i ; --------___ J .. .. I , , , -- N 8TH ST - I I I I --------- 1 I - '?JLocY... 3 '° '° 0 M 2 z 5 I -r--- 0 ~ I (\J [)' <{ -· w f>,.CR'c.f>..G ... z ~ w I' f>,.R\JI :,, a I p I 0 0:: Rl~-i;oi'I , it'1 I z <{ I ('.) ~ \jO\..· 'f.. '},, '?,Loe 3 s ae·s-4'26~ E \ 18.-00' I 0 N 01vs·34· E 1 -:j· 0 10.00' '. ; ci I ~ BB'!i4'26~ W Hl.00' 4 b • ~ ~ I ' I 5 f t-k-t. f C -</ SCALE 1 • -so· RECORO OWNER PUGET TOTAL PARCEL AREA EASEMENT AREA 180± S.F. POWER DATE WO NO: 9009044 PROPER rY MAP -EASEMENT AREA 91570/4 HAMMONO, COLUER & WADE -LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. •• .. I ; ' , > ~· E.X/t/8/T C-5 Guy stub and Anchor Eaflement ns An easement for guy stub and anchors over, under, and across a portion of lot 1, Block 3, Renton Fann Acre~ge as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats on page 37, Records of King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said lot l; thence south 1"05 1 34" West along the cast line thereof 48.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 86 • 59 1 0611 West a distance of 34 .16 feeti thence South 3 • 00' 54 u East a distance of 10. 00 feet; thence North 86 • 59 1 0611 East a distance of J 3, 44 feet ta the east line of said lot l; th-ence North 1•05 1 34 11 East along the east line thereof 10. 03 feet ta the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 338 square feet. 91570/5 W.O. No. 9009044 .• • I l • . -- = -S 89'27'25• E r N 8TH ST VACATED ol I VACA TEO I ,,,, I 'J-.1 5/16~~9'06~ W\ 18.H"-~ --------- S OJ-00'54• ( ~·:·:,·.·,·.·:.·.'·. 'f----10.0)' 10.00' fl 06'59'06 .. E j ~ JJ.44' .• I n ;,, p 0 "' f\C~tf>..Gt.. rf>..~\11 --.D z ~t\'f\0~ :;1 -.D e1...ocY-:; 0 w i '2.' (") \JO\..· ~'f-'2. - I~ ,.._ 5 '?,\..o _., 4 0 I I N I (1' 2 I z w I I 0 0:: <{ 0 3 = ,• 5 • J : , I , , f~/,,1,:f C-s-SCALE 1"~50• RECORD OWNEH PUGET TOTAL PARCEL AREA EASEMENT AREA 338± S.F. POWER OATE WO NO: 9009044 PROPERTY MAP -EASEMENT AREA 91570/5 HAMMOND. COLLIER & WADE -U,1NGST0NE ASSOCIA1ES, INC. ---~-------------- ~ 0 (\J ,)' cXH/81 T c-~ Guy Stub and Anchor Easement #6 An easement for guy stub and anchors over, under, and acrosG a portion of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section B, Township 23 North, Range 5 East~ W.M., more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at~ point on the south line of said subdivision at the intersection of the northerly extension of the centerline oi Garden Avenue North as shown on the Plat of Renton Farm Acreage as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, on page 37, Records of King County, Washington~ thence South 89"27 1 2511 East along the south line of said subdivision 42.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North l ·os 1 .34 11 East a distance of 41. 59 feet; thence South 88"54'26" East a distance of 10,00 feet: thence south 1"05'34" West a distance of 41,49 feet to the south line of said subdivision; thence North B9'27 '25 11 West along said south line !0.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. containing an area of 415 square feet. 91570/6 W,O, No. 9009044 -------·-----------~----· ··-·-····-·-· .. • .. " I • s aa·s4'2a~ E PORTION OF SE, NW, 10.00' SEC. 8, T2JN, RSE, WM N Ol'05'l<" [', 41.59' .·. ·.v s 01·05·34· w ·.·. 41,{9' ·.•.· -:,: . . ·,· 42.00' 10.00;-- I 0 I "' N 8TH ST . ' S B9'!r25" E I I 0 I I I "' "1-1 VACATED JO' 30' --------c.. ---- ~ ,. " ., 1 p 0 ~ <cJ,Gt- -f p._?-WI p._CR -.0 -.0 z Rl:.~,o~ ;,i1 0 (") \JO\..· ~~op'f-i -I~ r- 0 I I N <{ 5 4 O" 2 I I I z w 0 Q'.'. <{ " 3 I .. ;, • ~ ,,,1,,1,, f C-<:: SCALE 1 "=50' RECORD OWNER PUGET TOTAL PARCEL AREA EASEMENT AREA 415± S.F. POWER I DATE WO NO: 0009044 PROPERTY MAP -EASEMENT AREA 91570/6 HAMMOND, COLLIER & WAOE -LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. • C:.XHI Bl T C.-7 Power Pole and •rransmission Line Easement #7 An easement for power pole and transmission line over 1 under, and across a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section a, Township 2J North, Ranges East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the south line of said subdivision at the east margin of Garden Avenue North, forlllerly known as Garden Streat; thence North o·J6 1 07 11 East along said east margin 253.26 feet to a point of curve to the left of said east margin; thence North 82 • 07 1 34 11 East a distance of 18 .18 feet; thence South 7•52 1 26 11 East a distance of 258.68 feet to the south line of 5aid subdivision; thence North 89.27'2511 West along saiU south line 56.ll feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. containing an area of 9,445 square feet. 91570/7 W.O. No. 9009044 • I I I I ' I I I ,• • I ... . .. -'° '° D (") -r- 0 (\J Cl' ' ' ,_ 1 -z ~ 2 < 'Z 'W -a n:: < I I I PORTION OF SE, NW, SEC. 8, T23N, R5E, l'iM ' I w z JO' JO' -N B2'07'::W E 18.18' ·: .. u, ... 0 "" -.I ~- ···· ~. (.!) 3 r------J----4--1 2 )--!----1---____j 6 - ' [',J,. t. I C -7 RECORD OWNER TOTAL PARCEL AREA EASEMENT AREA 9.455± S.F. DATE 7 8 9 PROPERTY MAP -EASEMENT AREA 10 SCALE ,·~,oo· PUGET POWER WO NO: 9009044 ~ 91570/7 HAMMONO. COLLIER &: WAOE -Ll11NGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. -------' .• ' .. I HAMMOND, COLLIER 8c WADE -LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. Boeing/Renton Easements W .o. 9009014 April 24, 1992 CONSUL TING ENGINEERS c'l\1.\-IBIT C.-B LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PUGET POWER LlNE, SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY TO BOEING #2 SUBSTATION VIA LOGAN AVENUE --0 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 AND THE EAST HALF '4) Of SECTION 7 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CIT'f OF 0 RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS M FOLLOWS: r- 0 A 50 FOOT STRIP OF LAND BEING 2 5 FEE'!' ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING C\l DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; ~ BEGINNING AT A POlNT ON THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN THE BOEING COMPANY AND PUGET SOUND POHER AND LIGHT COMPANY; (AS ESTABLISHED BY RENTON L01' LINE ADJUSTMENT 004-88 AF NO, 8808309006 VOLUME 62, PAGE 143); DISTANT 30.91 FEET NORTH 14"36'26 11 WEST FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 51'06'51 11 WEST 405.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40'39 1 41 11 WEST 745.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0•22 1 48 11 WEST 699.24 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF LOGAN AVENUE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0"22'48 11 WEST 12.44 FEET TO THE EAST WES'I' CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 7 DISTANT 71. 15 FEET SOUTH 89 • 52' 15 11 WEST FROI1 THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 AND DISTANT O. J2 FEET SOUTH 89.52 1 15 11 WEST FROM THE EAST MARGIN OF LOGAN AVENUE WHICH IS THE SAME AS THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0•22 1 48" WEST 525.59 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT DISTANT 1,99 FEET WEST OF THE EAST MARGIN OF LOGAN AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 4"06'4<1 11 WEST 200.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 ·oo 1 26 11 WEST 81. 40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF BOEING #2 SUBSTATION DISTANT 124.50 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBSTATION SITE AND TERMIITTJS OF Tl!IS CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION, EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF SAID 50 FOOT STRIP LYING WITHIN THE LOGAN AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. UP'JIES 100/",2. . . .. = 3 f.J.;L, 't C-8 50' I I 7 :i !!! <( z <( (.? 0 ...J I ,1' I BOEING #2 I SUBSTATION 90' NOl '00'28"E 1026.94 SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT ,C, ,<:.. PROPERTY ~<,· .<§) (I .4' .!'~' / ABANDONED 8.N.R.R CO. 100 R.O.W. 2849.61 S89'30'32"E f-0 POWER LINE ALIGNMENT LINE I DIRECTION I DISTANCE 1 N51'06'51"E 405.4e 2 N40'39'4t"E 745.15 J S00'22' 4e"W 1237.27 4 N04 '06' 44"E 200.40 5 S69'00'26"E 61.40 ona 1011ft1 TWP. 23N., R.5E.,W.M. 1• 1::11 JOO' RECORD OWNER BOEING COMPANY PUGET POWER TOTAL PARCEL AREA N/A EASEMENT AREA N/A DATE 4-24-92 WO NO: 9009014 PROPERTY MAP -EASEMENT AREA "-------HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE -LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. ------' I I ·' '-.. .-·:.1:-:.:-:·;-,r.-·-;,_;-··--· -.•. .• • ... EASEMENT OF OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION AND UNDERGROUND FACILITES EXHIBIT C-9 Except as may be otharwise sot forth h~r~in Crantee's right shall Pe exercised upon that portion of the Property described as follow: That por~ion of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23N., Range 5 EWM., City of Renton, King county, Washington, being a portion of Government Lot 2 of Court Commissioners Plat as lying bet~een the Burlington Northern Rail Road on the west; Park Ave N.on the east; and Lake Wa5hington Blvd. on the north, Granter grants A right of way Ten (10) feet in width having Five (5) feet of width on each side of n centerline described aa follows: Beginning at the most Northerly property caner of the above described j property; thence Southwesterly along the Westerly property line C) thereof 400 feet; thence Easterly at a right angle to said Westerly l"'1 line to the Northerly margin of Park Ave. N.; thence Northerly along ~ said margin to the intersection of Garden Ave. N.; thence t1ortherly a along the North pr.operty line thereof to the point of beginning. N iJ' .. .. • . / ~ FXHIIJ/T C·Cf ' ' .. /BJ. ,,,"g.,";/"'' ..... .. .;;1 \ .... .... ' I ©:;;: . : ~J; I I ~ : , CO&,M AOOIJ El / • DUJll ..... \(H-0 ~C~l(I ,' . :: / OLD COIHl!Ol -l!OL!S[ f'\.I*' Hll\,ISE f.2J DOD Sff\.lFfLETOII n~~v Sll6 I '' ,-':\ ____ :)J __ ,,-,j I It:± I I = ~ ........ _____________ -j ... --.===rc"'==ffe•c•e_ ______ +--7tc' _____ -..:; .. -_ ~ I l ' DOCIM; 5W! ., .. PARK AVE N. . ' :;:!~--------- ~ ~ I .~····,-·--·----. ~ - ·' • I ... --:c;: ff I - • ,., L_ .~- V 0 ORIGINAL , EXCISE l/o.X iiOT RCOUIREO EASEMENT )t 1 l:Jt,,'· Records Ui·11sion ---fu -• ~ ~/) , Deputy For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, acting by and through its division Boeing Conunercial Airplane Group, ("Grantor" heroin), hereby grants and conveys to PUGET POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Puget" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth a non-exclusive perpetual eascmen~ as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B (the "Easement Area"), over, across and under the real property in King County, Washington as described in Exhibit C, which such exh.ibils are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This casement is granted subject to and conditioned upon the following tcnns, conditions and covenants which Puget hereby promises lo faithfully and fully observe and pcrfonn. I. ~-Puget shall have the right to construe~ operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an widerground electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Easement Area together with all necessary or convenient appurtenances tl1<rcfore, which may include but are not limited to the following: underground conduits, cables 1 communication lines: vaults, manholes, switches, and transformers; and semi-buried or ground mounted facilities. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Puget may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. 2. Compliance wilh Laws and Rules. Puget shall at all times exercise its rights herein in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. 3. Removal of Fill Material. In the event that Puget encowlters, or suspects that it has encountered any hazardous substances in the Easement Area in furtherance of its rights set forth in paragraph I, Puget shall cease all operations and notify Grantor. If the encountered or suspected hazardous substances are not the result of the acts or omissions of Puget, Grantor shall, at its own expense, detennine if the materia1 is hazardous, as determined by applicable law. If the material should prove to be hazardous, then the Grantor shall, at its own expense, remove, dispose, or otherwise handle such hazardous substances, as necessary, in accordance with applicable law, or reroute the Easement Area, if possible. If hazardous substances are removed, Grantor also shall provide substitute nonhazardous material to replace the removed material for t0480MDS !L'S /Ac 001 -I - ., .,, I ~ I ~ 8 SJ 8 ;; ~ ,1 ~ <l i 0 ~ - ~ " I J i j .I I ' ' ., 1 :1 . i ·' 1 1 ;[ . :l ·-~ ,.:.,, ', I: . ·~· .., 0 ORIGINAL Puget to use in its operation, ifnecesSIIJ)'. Should the encountc,ed or suspected material prove not to be haza1dous, Puget shall proceed with the operations at its own cost, with no recourse against the Grantor for the cost of schedule delays incurred due to the delay in operation. If the encountered or suspected hazardous substances are or may be the result of the acts or omissions of Puget, Graators characterization of the substances involved and any removal, disposal or other handling costs incurred in connection with the removal, disposal or handling of the hazardous substances will be at Puget's expense, and Puget shall have no recourse ag11inst Grantor for the cost of schedule delays incurred due ta the delay in operation. 4. Puget Use and Actiyj)ies. Except us provided in Paragraph I, Puget shall not use, or allow the use of, the Easement Alea for any pwpose whatsoever. Puget shall eic,ercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize, and avoid if reasonably possible, interference with Grant01's use of the Easement Alea as set forth in Paragraph 5, Puget shall, at all times, exercise its rights hereunder in a manner so as to prevent bodily harm to persons (whomsoever) and damage to property (whatsoever). Puget shall maintain and repair the Easement Area (and improvements thereon) as necessary to keep the same in a neat, clean Wld safe condition. 5. Grnntor's Use of the Easement Area and Access by Gran!or During Construction. Granter reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted; provided, that Grantar shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Easement Area which would interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted. Puget shall make provisions satisfactory to Grantor for continued access by Grantor along, over and across the Easement Area during periods in which Puget is conducting construction or other activities. In the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by either pany for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, .,uch pany may take such action upon such notice to the other party as is reasonable under the circumstances. 6. Indemnity. Puget agrees to release, indemnify and hold hurmless Grantor, Grantor's directors, officers, employees, agents servants and representatives from any and all actions, liabilities, demands, claims, suits, judgments, liens, awards, and damages of any kind or character whatsoever (hereinufter referred to as "Claims"), including claims for death or injury to employees of Puge~ costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Grantor in defense thereof, asserted or arising directly or indirectly from, on account of, or in connection with Puget's operation, maintenance and control ofth'! Easement Area (and improvements thereon). With respect to all or any portion of the foregoing obligation which may be held to be within the purview of RCW 4.24. 115, such obligation shall apply only to the maxin,um extent permitted by RCW 4.24. 115. As between the parties and for pW]loses only of tl1e obligations herein assumed, Puget waives any immunity, defense or other protection -2 - 101!0!1\0S ' .. hi Cl ORIGINAL tl10t may be awarded by any workers compensation, industrial insurance or similar laws (including but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington). 7. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Puget ceases to use said Easement Arca for a period of five (5) successive years, in which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shall revert to G.-antor. 8. ~-Notices required to be in writing under this Agreement shall be personally served or sent by U.S. mail. Any notice given by mail shall be deemed to have been received when tluee days have elapsed from the time such notice was deposited in the U.S. mail addressed as follows: To Grnntor: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group P.O. Box 3707 -MIS 75-66 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attn: Manager of Planning & Leased Properties Phone: 237-1945 with a copy to; To Puget: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group P.O. Box 3707 -MIS 76-52 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attn: Group Counsel Phone: 237-2682 Puget Sound Power & Light Company Renton Service Center 620 Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: -=---- Phone: 2SS-2464 Either party may change the address to which notices may be given by giving notice as above provided. 9. ~. Puget shall have tl1e right of reasonable access to the Easement Area over and across adjacent lands owned by Grantor to enable Puget to exercise its rights hereunder, provided that Puget shall compensate Gmntor for any damage to the Easement Area caused by the exercise of said right of occess and the cost of any repairs res1dting therefrom at the actual customary cost of such repair. -3 - 10.UOMDS . ' .. ~ .. -,. 1, ,, I f . ' () ORIGINAL 10. No WarraJUis.:;. The rights granted herein nre subject to pennits, leases, licenses, and easements, if any, heretofore granted by Grantor affecting the Easement Area. Grantor does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. Any plans, specifications, or drawings (collectively, "Submittal") provided by Puget to Grantor pursuant to this Agreement are for Grantor's informational purposes only. Any analysis, review or approval by Grantor, or Grantor's failure to analyze, review or approve such Submittal (including failure to discover any error or defect in such Submittal) shall not relieve Puget of any of its obligations under tltis Agreement. Grantor hereby expressly disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, with respect to any such Submittal developed, reviewed or approved by Grantor as a condition of this Agreement. 11. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligBtions of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. 12. Terrninerion: Relocation. !2.1 Grantor may require Puget to relocate the easement granted hereby Bl any time and from time to rime to another area of the Grantor's property, provided that any such relocation shall be at Grantor's expense, and provided that any area to which the easement is relocated shall be deemed tlte "Easement Area" for all purposes of this ins~ument from the date of such relocation. 12.2 In the event Puget breaches or fails to perform or observe any of U,e terms and conditions herein, and fails to cure such breach or default within ninety (90) days of Grantor's giving Puget written notice thereof, or, if not reasonably capable of being cured within such ninety (90) days, within such other period of time as mBy be reasonable in the circumstances, Grantor mBy terminate Puget's rights under this Agreement in addition to and not in limitation of any other remedy of Gran tor Bl law or in equity. and the failure ofGrantor to exercise such right at any time shall not waive Grantor's right to tem,inate for any future breach or default. 12.3 Upon tennination of this Agreement and if requested by Grantor, Puget, at its sole cost and expense, shall remove from the Easement Area any and all improvements thereon and restore the Easement Area to a condition as good or better than it was prior to construction of said improvements . • 4. 104!0MOS ....... = 0 ORIGINAL 12.4 No termination of this Agreement shall release Puget from any liability or obligation with respect t y matter occurring prior to such termination. PUGET: Puget Sound Power & Light Company By: Its: .,.,.=,...,.b>/l="'--UM STA TE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. GRANTOR: The Boeing Company, by and through its division, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group '»~ Its.~~~~~~~~~ JJ, Nelson Director, F1clliHes and Serv!m B011ln1 Commercial Airplane GIOGjl On this ~Y of 1994, before me the undersigned personally COUNTY OF KING ~ •ppeared J. J. NELSON to me own to be the person who signed as DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES ofBoeing Commercial Airplane Gn:up, a division of THE BOEING CO!v!PANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrumeo~ and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntal)' act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, 1111d on oath stated that he \ rwas~duly-au: .: ,: ' d to execute the snid instrument t'.f f :li~!"r r~ e}·:',; .... .-.. -·::, "'"J ~t{Ji1f \\,\·>~·· ..... ::,•·;,}., i':',{'· Ll,.,..Of 'iii.~.,,,,,, .• GiL.::.:: ............. ·. · .. , .. ·. ---·-·· -5. !OHOMDS "!: - I - ., .... _J _ -,,,. Ml ( ,r, 0 ORIGINAL r . wm=,., ....... """'·~ wnnen. Notary Public in and for the State fWashin on residin STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) at ~ My commission expire On this J__ day of ~. l 994. before me the undersigned personally appeared A-:r :To-ts to me known to be the llm', it#iiim,,f PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrurnen~ Wld acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary oct and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on ooth stated that he was duly authorized to execute the said insttument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. (6f ~ No bbcinand for the State JlL..Washington residing at ~Mfr: . My commission expires~-'fi -6 - IOOOMDS J; .. - 1 •./ -~ .P'.: E) 0 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A (legal description of Easement Area) Except as muy be otherwise set forth herein Puget's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property (the "Easement Area") described as follows: The West ten (IO) feet of the South 25 feet of the North 95 feet of the Property described in Exhibit C. 104roMDS ,· ' l ' ....... Cl ORIG~NAL I EXHIBITB (drawing showing Easement Area) i ., ! -'-,-. .;. ... • ,.:, .... cm / ,, ' i \/1 II .-:.· - c.; . .Jed • .. < :i:-:i fJWTIO. ni,< o/u: "" -.----'.--· I I. ' ::::: .I· .. 1: · •::.-:: ·•·•1·• ·1 ::::1•••-• ·•1·· ·.. r -·:: . ::.-.. .· .-· ·--p. --,-i , •. ,·. ·l .,---- !---·'-· T 1·:· ,,,.,, l":. !'••· ·"·I ! ! •. ! ij .. • I J' ! ,·--i--. --:--·· ·---,,L--,· : I I I I :; . . ""..,., -__L2' J . I· I "' ii• ~ ~l'Ut\ ' ' .,.. :=;;-~--. ··--:-· l • -/.'·' ·• · 0 -•l--·, .-·· -·-;-.-,-;;~ --+---~---· -.. -.,-F !U-,,, .,... : 'I-\-·I:·\. J ·:!· ~ :t,i,=::t,=-::-~~-:-:.t, ::-~,.:.~. ~.:_:-:=f::::j,t. ~:::::t:::=-t, -:z.::±::::::j,~,======12 -;-,--:r-· ·'..-:-,,-,, I · ' . ··r1 >ii··· •. f.·11_ .. _ .. _... ·:::~-. ' -~=--.·· . _![_! ___ ···-· 'i----··-· .. ----'-"'-•-'-·'-I_'...:':-'.:'-·-'---'--'-"-'-c-'~1.--1"'- :•? i =.: ~:."1 ::::l I ' i I ~~~. . ; ~; _ _'._ ·-~ ;_:_,-.~---!I~.,-:: 1 i + -~·:'f!m . ··•·_, 1 , __ ,.,.,. .. r ..... , .. ·.·1·:·· ··1· ;,. .··• !'.~ ~ !! t !!! · ... ·-::c:·· ·.:r ;!: .. -.( "_, 1-• SNOU. Tl\313 H111113H \ltiOJ i ~ . ' z-+- IJllfll._ ·.·, :·,, .. ,·. -Jf'" '·~ {"" 1·,·~;_,,i,"-;~:,:_:..-•. ,f.t, ;:ai == 0 EXHJB!TC (legal description of real propeny) The North 300 feet of the East 100 feet of the Northwest quor1er of the Southwest quor1er of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 05 Eas~ W.M.; EXCEPT the West ten (10) feet thereof conveyed to the Cily of Renton for road. IOUOMDS • :~ i 0 • ORIGINAL - NO\' 2 11~ci ' P. EASEMENT For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, acting by and through its division Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, ("Grantor" herein), hereby grnnts and conveys to PUGET POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Puget" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth a non-exclusive perpetual easement, as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B (the "Easement Area"), over, across and under the real property in King County, Washington as described in Exhibit C, which such exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This casement is granted subject to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants which Puget hereby promises to faithfully and fully observe and perform. I. ~-Puget shall have the right to consbuc~ operate, maintain, repair, replace und enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Easement Area together with all necessary or convenient appurtenances tlierefore, which may include but arc not limited to the following: underground conduits, cables, communication lines; vaults, manholcst switches, and transformers; and semi-b11ried or ground mounted facilities. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Puget may from time to time construct such additional faGilities as it may require. 2. Compliance with Lnws nnd Rules. Puget shall at all times exercise its rights herein in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. 3. Removal of fill Material In the event that Puget encounters, or suspects that it has encountered any hazardous substances in the Easement Area in furtl1erance of its rights set forth in paragraph I, Pugel shall cease all operations and notify Grantor. lf the encountered or suspected hazardous substances are not the result of the acts or omissions of Puget, Granter shall, at its own expense, dctennine if the material is hazardous, as detemincd by applicable law. If the material should prove to be hazardous, then the GrW1tor shall, at its own expense, remove, dispose, or otherwise handle such l1azardous substances, as necessary, in accordance with applicable law, or reroute the E11Scment Area, if possible. If hazardous substances are removed, Grantor also shall provide substitute nonhazardous material to replace the removed material for ~ ... 3 0 5 O· 8 i 1 1 ' 0 • Puget to use in its operation, ifnece!;sary. Should the encountered or suspected material prove not to be hazardous, Puget shall proceed with the operations at its own cost, with no recourse against the Grantor for the cost of schedule delays incurred due to the delay in operation. If the encountered or suspected hazardous substances arc or may be the result of the acts or omissions of Puget, Grantor's characterization of the substances involved and any removal, disposal or other handling costs incurred in connection with the removal, disposal or handling of the hazardous substances will be at ruget's expense, and Puget shall havi: no recourse asainst Granter for the cost of schedule delays incurred due to the delay in operation. 4. Pu~et Use ond Activities. Except as provided in Paragraph I, Puget shall not use, or allow the use of, the Easement Area for any purpose whatsoever. Puget shall exercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize, and avoid if reasonably possible, interference with Grantor's use of the Easement Area as set forth in Paragraph S. Puget shall, al all times, exercise its rights hereunder in a manner so as to prevent bodily harm to persons (whomsoever) and damage lo property (whatsoever). Puget shall maintain and repair tl1c Easement Area (and improvements thereon) us necessary to keep the same in a neat. clean and safe condition. 5. Grnntor 1s Use of the Easement Aren and Access by Grantor During Constrnctign. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted; provided, that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Easement Arca which would interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted. Puget shall make provisions satisfactory to Gran tor for continued access by GrWltor along, over and across the Easement Area during periods in which Puget is conducting construction or other activities. In the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by either party for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, such party may take such action upon such notice to the other party as is reasonable ltnder the circumstances. 6. Indemnity. Puget agrees to release, indemnify and hold harmless Grantor, Grantor's directors, officers, employees, agents servants and representatives from any and all actions, liabilities, demands, claims, suits, judgments, liens1 awards, and damages of any kind or character whatsoever (hereinafter referred to as "Claims"), including claims for death or injury to employees of Puget, costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Grantor in defense thereof, asserted or arising directly or indirectly from, on account of, or in connection with Puget's operation, maintenance and control of the Easement Arca (and improvements tl1ercon). Witl1 respect to all or any portion of the foregoing obligation which may be held to be witl1in the purview of RCW 4.Z4. I 15, such obligation shall apply only to the maximum extent pennined by RCW 4.24.115, As between the parties and for purposes only of the obligations herein assumed, Puget waives any inununity, defense or otl1er protection -2 - !04XOM!JS l L. j / f) • that may be awarded by any workers compensation.. industrial insurance or similar laws (including but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 of the Revised Code ofWRshington). 7. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Puget ceases to use said Easement Area for a period offive (5) successive years, in which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shall reven to Grantor. 8. ~-Notices required 10 be in writing under this Agreement shall be personally served or ser.t by U.S. mail. Any notice given by mail shall be deemed to have been received when three days have elapsed from the time such notice was deposited in the U.S. mail addressed as follows: To Granto,: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group P.O. Box 3707 -MIS 75-66 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attn: Manager of Planning & Leased Properties Phone: 237-1945 with a copy to: To Puget: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group P.O. Box 3707 -MIS 76-52 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attn: Group Counsel Phone: 237-2682 Puget Sound Power & Light Company Renton Service Center 620 Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: ---~-- Phone: 255-2464 Either party may change the address to which notices may be given by giving notice as above provided. 9. A£,w. Puget shall have the right of reasonable access to the Easement Area over and across adjacent lands owned by Grantor to enable Puget to exercise its rights hereunder, provided that Puget shall compensate Granter for any damage to the Easement Area caused by the exercise of said right of access and the cost of any repairs resulting therefrom at the actual customary cost of such repair. "3 " l0480MOS 0 • IO. No Warranties. The rights granted herein are subject to pennits, leases, licenses, and casements, if any, heretofore granted by Granter affecting the Easement Area. Granier does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. Any plans, specifications, or drawings (collectively, "Submittal") provided by Puget to Granter pursuant to this Agreement are for Granters infonnational pt.;-poses only. Any analysis, review or approval by Grantor, or Grantor's failure to anaJyze, review or approve such Submittal (includiug failure to discover any error or defect in such Submittal) shall not relieve Puget of any of its obligations under this Agreement, Grantor hereby expressly disclaims any and all warranties, ex.press or implied, with respect to any such Submittal developed, reviewed or approved by Granter as a condition of this Agreement. 11. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon tlieir respective successors and assigns. 12. Tennination· Relocetion. 12. I Grantor may require Puget to relocate the easement granted hereby at any time and from time to time to another area of the Grantors property, provided that any such relocation shall be at Grantors expense, and provided that any area to which the easement is relocated shall be deemed the "Easement Area" for all purposes oftlus instrument from the date of such relocation. 12.2 In the event Puget breaches or fails to perfonn or observe any of the tcnns and conditions herein, and fails to cure such breach or default within ninety (90) days of Grantors giving Puget written notice thereof, or, if not reasonably capable of being cured within such ninety (90) days, within such other period oftime as may be reasonable in tl1c circwnstances, Grantor may tenninate Puget's rights under this Agreement in addition to and not in limitation of any other remedy of Granter at law or in equity, and the failure of Gran tor to exercise such right at any time shall not waive Grantor's tight to tenninate for any future breach or default. 12.3 Upon tennination oftlus Agreement and if requested by Granter, Puget, at il5 sole cost and expense, shall remove from the Easement Arca any and all improvements thereon and restore the Easement Area to a condition as good or better than it was prior to construction of said improvements. -4 - ------_____ J l0480MDS I t _ -- --~ ' i .( '( G • 12.4 No termination of this Agreement shall release Puget from any liability or obligation with respect to any matter occurring prior to such tennination. DATED~{ 2,g , 1994. PUGET: Puget Sound Power & Light Company STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. GRANTOR: The Boeing Company, by and through its division, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group JJ. Nelson Director, feclllH,s end Sem:itir,w Boeing Cornn10rci.,1 Airplane g~ On this'ii!f..y of • 1994, before me the undersigned personally COUNTY OF KING ~ appeared J, J, NELSON to 1e wn to be the person who signed as DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES ofBoeing Commercial Airplane Group, a division of THE BOEING COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute the said instrument. -- • WITNESS my band and official seal written. STA TE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KJNG ) otary Public in and~ the State ofW~on retJrE at ~n~,.4. My commission expiresr/78' Onts ~ of !lv,J,..., 1994, before me the undersigned personally appeared 111 to me known to be thell,11tJ.,lM{6,,r(of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIG T COMP ANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute the said instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. No ubl c in and for the State of Washington residing at ---rkbM,f-, My commission expires Ja.c;J.1-48 -6- -.:,.!_''.'. ,:-';1, ---.. ---~ --1 ·1· .. . ' . .,.-.:·;. · .. _._._"_,·._·.···_,', ..• ·.,: •. ··.· .. -.. '.·.· •. ·_:_· __ :_--.·.~:.:,:!, .. · •. [~·· .. ·.·,·.·. : •' ·.';.,,.::: ;·.);},/:,.:_.-.-'>,;~ __ r ...... '~ ... k = - ~ 0 • EXIDBITA (legal description of Easement Area) Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Puget's rights shall be «ercised upon that portion of the Property (the "Easement Area") described as follows: The West ten ( IO) feet of the South 25 feet of the North 95 feet of the Property described in Exhibit C. !04IOMDS r. , .. •. . .. · ) :.:,.-.. e,·.-· .. " . .'e;.'·-'J;J"'l~-"' , .. ~.1.. .,·, .,,,., ,·,i1 '>r'' .... ·.Ll,, .... 1;;111\;,.~ii:J - (l • EXHIBIT B (drawing showing Easement Area) -~ \ ' \ I ·. / 10-00MDS == :~ 0 • . ~. S'\WI. sec a. T Zl P-L ft ~ E. w.J.t. -..---v-$-.. ... -z W- ~ g ~ r-"'1~--=-~~·~-.... ~ ""'-"' ~~ ::; 5 ~ ~i .:~!,.'. ·1· .-1---;--w.-i,q·'··-lt~ ";;-~---. -' -: 1· i · • :-\1,.1..r· · J ·' ·J I ' · · i : : I ,_ .. _:l ·I .•. ,,,,, I 'I' -~.---,·-. -,--·----, ··-;;- ! :I: 'L} L . J __ ,_J ___ ,_J_,_i I :-L~::L J::-·t -;:~,~± ... : __ ~ .. l--1 :3:: l 1' J;J JH ::: )i --:/ ::::: ' .:i ... oo !l ... :C >, ' l'NM, s:;.: t. T z:i V I.I\ L. -- --~. \" 'ft ' - • • EXHIBITC (legal description of real property) The North 300 feet of the East 100 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 05 Eas~ W.M.; EXCEPT the West ten ( I OJ feet thereof conveyed to the City of Renton for road. l°'4$0MDS •. ,·, I .,·,,.,,'.,,' ... ._,,,\'/:,!ti ~1 .,J 9 •1, , ,.-,:/,,,1. ),<,t,.,lq,;;,.: ,il, ,,it:·/ .. ":/Ht ?t,, 0 . • • • , .... >1•'{" , .... " • ,,,,. fi'J 1- _Cf'l'Y OF ~ENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . .J.'.l.l.2__ AN (JRDrNANCJ? OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHrtHl'fON, VACATING h PORTION Of CALIFORNIA A VEN UP. (N. 71'11) AND ALLfY BP.TWEEN CALIPORNIA AVENUE (N, 7TH) ANn N. 8TH STREET (UC M9) WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Caliromia Avenue (N. 7th St.) and alley beh,'eE-n Cali!~la Avenue-(N, 7tti "iot.) and N. 8th Street ncnton, King Cot.1nty 1 Wa.~hlng-ton, was duly filed wfth ttie City Clerk on 01· about February t, 1919, and !aid petltlon havlng been signed ti;, ownel"&: representing more than two-thirds of the prorerty abutting upoo such street and &lie~· sourht to b" ,.oceted; and WHEREAS th.e City r',euncil by Rr,solution No, 2247 pas:ied and approved on P~bruerj' 26, I919, tmd arter due lnve.,;tigRtion, did fi:it anc, determine the !6th day of M.areh, 1979, 11t the hour of 8:00 P .M, irw the Clty Council Chambers _of ttl:f! City of Renton to be the time and plaee for e pubUc, hearing there-on, and the City Clerk ha~ng given due notice or sueh heariflg in the manner provided by law, and sai<l t,earinc having been continued to April 9, I919 And April 16, 1979, !ind all persons having been heard appE:aring in favor or in opposltion thereto; end WHE"RE'AS the Department of PlJbJic Works snd the Planning JJepartment of the City of Renton heving duly eons1dered said petltion for said vacation, and having found same to be in the pub!ic interest 111Yi for the put>ll!! benefit, and 110 injury or clR.rnage to any person or properties will ff§lllt from such vacations; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, l'IASlflNGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS, SECTION I: ~ following d~rlbe<J portion oC street and alley, to-wit; See Exhibit 11 A11 attached ha-eto and m11:de 'l pa.rt her •Qf es lf fully set forth liErein, BE AND TJfE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED ~UBJBCT to e.n e:esemer;t over, acrami, Ul'\der end on all of <::ellfornia Avenue (N. 1th St.) In [avor o( the City for utility and r,elated p~es. SECTION m The City Council hereby eiects to ttharge a fee of $21,966.25 to Petitioner-Owners, said amount not excuding one-half of the City's appraisal of Desoription: King,WA Document-Year.Month.Day. DocID 1979.5_~1_: 642 Pa.~g~a!_:,~1'_'0e>fc__"5~""'""'""""'.,..._ .. L . ..,,..-i..· Ord8r; l Comment: ·------. ------------------ ------· ~--'"'"'-""'-· ==,.,...,...,.,====== the right-9(-wf!ly Interest herein vsc11ted, nM ~uch ctiargc being reasooob!c ond proper. ~!!...!!!: Tl'lls Ordin~nce shall be Pffectlve upon its passago, .appMve.1 ,iod (he day, after lt.s publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be !iJed with the Otrite of Racord:9 and mee.Uons, King County, and lilS otherwise (X"Ov: · ~ by lew. PASSED BY 'f!IE ClTY COUN"Cf'" is 14th<Jay of May, 1979. APrROVED BY THE MAYOR Approved as lo form: /"' ----.. (/ ,.•v.~,f~ ... J \;~IA._:,,.•~''-- Lawrence J. W,U!Jin, City Attorney Date of Publication: 5/18/79 -3-0 #3319 Description; King,WA DoC'l.llllQnt-Year.~~_!_h.Day.DocI~ 1979.521.642 Pagfil: 2 of 5.j·~k "f~_".:.::i' order : 1 Coromen t ; .......... ~~--... "-·-··· EXHIBIT A VAC 4-19 (revised 4-2J-7i:J) Ordinance #~Jl9 That portion of the north one-half of the 60 ft. street r1ght~of-w~y kDown as N. 7th St. as dedtcate,j wlthin the plat of Renton Faf"lll Acrea-ge, il.Ccordtn!I to the plat recordetl in Volume 12, page J7 records of K1ng County Hashinnton; lvin9 west of t~ Wl.!St margin of G~rden Avenue N. e11,tlf!t"\dtd; and lying eaH of the west boundary of said plat. Together with that portioo of the 16 ft. dedkated alJey lying adjacent to and abuttinq tllereon the west line of 6lock J, Renton Farm •c:reage, according to the plat thereof recorded fn Volu~ 12 of plats, page 37 rtcords of J::ing County Wash1ngt<m; except the north 30 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Renton -~ vr street purposes under Audi tor' S File No. 5180889. Descript.ion; Ki"ng,WA Do~nt-Y~a.r._~nth.Day,Doclp 1979.521.642 Page: 3 of 5t"WMf-~.~'.,,•-""-' order: 1 Co.r:nmen t: C\I ~ -.1 EX~IB!T B VAC 4-79 Ordinance #3319 An easement for l.lt1 lity purposes over that portion of the north one .. half of the 60 ft. $treet right 9 of~way known as N. 7th St. as ded1cated wlthin the pl at of Ren too film Acrellge accord1ng· to ttle pldt recorded in Volume 12, pa~ 37 records of King County Wasri11tgton lying west of the west margin of Garden Avenue N. eKtendeO; and lying east of the west boundary of 5ald plat. i.:uh.,.C Of lH::C: CITY Cl£Rt\ ._.__,,.,,,,..,~i 6W,i1"1'f.'"'idl!<10i.eC""ii ,.,<t,!61t1LOG,.;;.. -- ·---.';;"°;;;;'.;;·';;'U.;;•;.;',;';;· sou,:;,r~":.---iitt<l IDN, WASA. 98oS§ De.sr::ript:ion: King,WA D<:icument-Year.Month.Day.DocID 1979.521.642 Paga; 4 of 5 Order; 1 Comment: ··,: ,_ .,, ~ . "' '" c:.J .. ,•-I ,·, ~-:, ,_, .,--. _., ... 'r< ~ -------··--····-·---------- v.. D,g.scr1pt:ion: King, WA Document-Year .Month. Day. DoaID 1979. 521. 642 ·Page: 05:..._~a~E_:5~w .. ..it7K7K~-,..,,.-,~+,,,,..II&< Order: 1 Comment: I I Wtl'iflfCO'lDEDf..fl, ;.ii, r:, Off\ce <JI !he C:~yCIIHl< l'lerit<m c~1 Hall 10:i5Sou1hGradyW,r; F.<>nton. WA A!IOII~ BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BIHOIHO SITE PLAN SE 1:4 SECi 7 TWP 23N. RGE. 5£:., W.M SW 1/~ SEU 8. TWP 23 N RGE. 5£., WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,;;-,, I 2.-I 7-_ 2,-_0C' _7 J<,i:d!,~ 1, ;/:J~. BU'-"''~, I)...,., C,1,,L. --N,Ji<-.lYP,llH·C PFf/,_<;QNA,1> A,'~i" oqf~ __A:l.,___ D( _f-r ....,, 1 i. _ _ , "[R~•)NA~L, ,,.~.., '~ ~, ; "'1 PPOv[.; CO ,i-E ~ ~;[ 8AS•I' .. ?~.~:~:~;;~z":}:['7~CI; ~';' :r,:~1-c~';.~t'st::~~~ ~:.,~~~~:1:;g f~~.~~,.;:-;,'i;",';;~ ;·'t7'ts'"' A~~ ~·~·,,, :,'Ht o~ fl,[ ·~s,,,v,.,,,,. ",tf ,'CPso,· •YI :,.c ,_,;,•y ~'P'.Jt/ 8[HAc• a, ""'~" '"' ~fP<;r;,, a'.-ft,J Pf(.c·'J"O n•( •. ,S,PU!li'N' Cl ry OF f'?[NTfJt,' 40M.'N•S rRA TOR OF: P[:ANN!NG /-· /,UILOING / f'UBUC WORKS L·lli.2.. S'Jf:V[_YQR_._$ __ ([.RT,'FJCA rr:- ,,1-'.;t7--J48 -f3SP U,i[)-J5-00/6 LEGAi D[SCRl.f?I1Qf:/__QE.__(X!_STlr,:c_~ ("~;; "'iR•C•/,/ m,r 'N5L'~N,'(.[ Wl.<PA/,/Y ,x..,1,111"'[~' ~" "~-' ;, fhl<;l • ~-. '. a~""" lfaRLJ'ORY id,'°'''-' P,nc.:, \ Ii ' ANO f '"' uc:· ~ "AS' JF ·~,, e·,o·~·~ Vt~,.~ WT A ,.,~ 0' RC~'ON 'iH'.Jl/f P'.'1 ~,-.,nc~ ~9J-i19 ~t~L~D[D N~1-n,ecp :,, ,ga9 c·~'O[R K!.~C ,:ov,VTY ~CCOP[J,'.VC ~o 891'1<Ja% o~ o•nC,',t R[C&lO> [,(CFPC IHAI PO,,lr{J~ C[)t/ef'f~ ro '"" err, or RO/lON UY ~v,r ,;,.,.., uc,~ ~,~(:,'t(Jci) ,·c•.![1,,Af_R > /9~, (J~Jf~ R[(.();;D,NC .v(J ~-IIU~~<lj 'Jf" (/t/j(.\A( H~(.UaU;, 'A' no<, (.'G~·: ~A)H,VGfO~ A[$•) C>'.'[POtlG "<[q£Fi?0,, fe'A/ ~l)HT,(!N ~(.·N\?Y!,!) ,~ rHC QTY JF ~{!H(.'I', !,' Ole-~ RffGROCC AV'J(;'SI ''· 2:Y.!£ •.'NO[.!? .~i.CO!?O'VO ~·~ 20C0Qi:!ll(:~0!'~ IN"''~ COc',,IY l'l<SHJ!,c:JN LCTS t.; .1. • ,,..; ), ~,?C< ), i?CN,0,,' ,-AR'-' At;,<[.A',[, ACCORO,N~ '? 1><£ >c,f r/-<[/?[O> k[CQR[,[C w -,:lcC'"E 12 OF Pl~'S. PA(.'f J>. J,N Km~' C(Jl,NfY, WAY,INCfr.!N, ,,cur ;,-.(RU~?J,J '><E NO,,fl< J<;:;.o '"ff/,:,, ~All) w• ',;;:,,.•,i:,n, IQ fhc" (.''Y Q/" O[Nr/]N '""' :;,R,u ~vqi'Vif.,. 'JN.,fi? R>:~W.UJNC ''<I ~'~"~~; (!' (;'H(.'rAl Hg'(Wj)~ •:S,) <<C["l 1hA' µCJ'l"()I, ("(!>,'<1.1:~· '~ '><i (,","( Of 0[1//(;N [IY '"A' .'N:Ci.'N~~lNC l!U,<l'•.'L~ Of.C[j./BCA '2. 2{.)QI; !!1-10(,< /?Cl"(.i',l)N~" ,~0 2006:Z'100()JjB ,1-1 .~•NG C:J,,.'~'IY. W!Sl-<'''GfG~. :ocu~,~ .,,., ,,.., N,:.,,,,h ,.,,, ~, 1-,,·,•to w,n~ ''" 5"'H' Ao,10,t1,1-1G ·~a /HA.- """''"" oc l,c,iV AC•JO•,·,,,~ !!N ·~· ~<;' •s v•c••tD .. ,~·o,~ C'CY 0' RC~'O~ ORC'·~"·':[ ,c JJ1~ ,,;:, <!(.'0~:>',,J "AV,,_ ·~'~ ~·,.1,~ ~.,,c c.·w~·v NtCOI/JW, ,·Q 1~052'06-<2 or omo,.,_ r-rtc.V<v'>. 1/,/ ~•NG C0'-''1'"· ,..,~,,,~'-'[)t. .. . ;l'{'..NOPr;. J<:DCX./Yr: or_.:t~r .-,,, 1%~0 CC["] ,JI-·~· Mc>R''""'-'' ?CAf?C[q Of "" 50c%'"{"$r OU~P~ or 5l'C',OI, ~. Tj,1?,5~,~ 2J ,>ORT-I. i,MJC[ 5 [ASC, l>l(.LAM0Tf g;~~1"r,;;',,;;~~.;~£r'~;~::.,~';%"';-re, ,,,,:qeor. co~vf,f? -c c~f r,,, OF •F·"'"" FOR <;rq;n P,J~0Sf5 ,,'IJD[q QfCO~O•/./C ,.t, .. &'£Q ~·eo~B> Of" omc:,, PE~ORD5 AlSO fxr.[PT 1fi"rRrrw,., 'l-<AT PGP"ir;N "<!;~,a. ~\'rA'G ,.,r,;,11 T><£ '"!:ST "00() c",,, or ,;';;:.~C,~;,;;~' ,~, $~'!t,~?'oi-"'..~ OO,,.,~g'~~t5£J;;'~!o~';~i~,':,' ,i' ~',?,~';;r~~r:i nr..;a~orr, J.j~r.·~R ~EUOROJNG ~G .lJ<>iJj 0, 0.r,cr.c R[C:J,,% A(Sb-'UC[/'' IHfRG"'<tou T)<Af ~Gq~Q.IJ ..,...,c, "'' D[rnrn '0 "'' c,rv :J> qfNTOIJ 9, Q[[J; P[(:0ROW ,\11,[ 7, •gH,U>JQ,2. R[Oi?O'NC NO 9<060105}~ o• :),'>': .. , q,c·0~;,1· A0 ~0 EXCfY' IHA,'.' ~ORnoc;•to,,.•if ,to .'j '· !" _:•', QI O{N"V-,l;I" 'H.>' ~';"'~"Cfl r "I ~(J',:'t ;, Dfl[~~!F' ';', l{XJ(; ·"'"&! R[~ORc'J~~ NI) .~"''6,:··1cc;r.u~ '" .. ki~;;. er,.-.,,. a'A1•"%TC·~ PARCEL~-• ,orl, '""?'GO [jT LI~~· •Dv!,'~;;h,,.--, ~c ~o/i-8B. R[V)RO[~ "<i't"'-'8'" '"· :;ei, l.,~l)rn PfCCRO•Nr. N~ 881,169iX' OF r>•nr1AJ lii<CORJS. :,, ~,,,~ i:o~,,r,, ~AY"'~"'OA' ;:~~~~0~°';: ~;~t;r1~ [.,t:.);:;r;~; Aji'·_;,'.'.;,,.:/2'.i~'.~(/z.;~;~,;~, n•fiF(Y :J.~~;-v::7,..,, ... ; .":/~~,6~~;:,~~:~!f.v?'s~1R NOQ'.'.' .,,., 5rm, ,o...:,,~·~~-., ,ACAr[C ~l$O''JOOHHD1 ,.,:')/ U,AT i>OR/ICJN ()( A""fY A0,J{)IM"IG 0~ "1[ ~5' 'IACACZ.a v'tiV[R CJTV ~ RrNTON ono,.~AN{.[-~~ <0<8. Ar{'J Pff(}f',,(,O ,.,,~:~ 1 '98' U'ID{I? QfCl)SJ,AG NO f>QJ1ro51/J,.or om<'.:.'Ar Ptcon.o, . PAR,;[~ < 6 ,:i, J. ~we;, ,. "~~·:-~;;.,";~~;;; AC"l?[_Ai.r AJii,roN. •.:C"ORQ•NC re n,; ~,,: n,,~,".Jr Ri"CC-'"DI!! W ··~J "'"t ,, 01 ·:",• rs, ,"•Gf' J-'. ,,. ,ONf, We'~,., ~'"'"""'ON, n;,an,1,p "'"' '><M OORO~N<if ,_.,,,. A~JOl,/NG.CN '"' ,1nr ,~CA'7".~ ct.Dr" c.rc o• RflJfC~ (IR~WA'JC[ NO •o<,;,,1~·0 P~CORO[Q .,.,c,• "· ,9B/ u.~c,,, •rco:,o,vc ~,-; ~'Vl"~~I~ (It '.!'l•CiAc ~fCDRD5 we 5 A.VD ;Ph~'"· au/'hC" c"<'l~M(//l[ ••• ,.,1,G A ~,'h[}<NG 5:,r P[.,,. O[C~R;;f~ O[C[M&[i? tJ. wr,, ~·•,c'E• •l0'1!)/r-,/~ "0-2W'1UJOOO~OO. ,,. ,..,!JMf 225 PA:t': BJ Th•c:,,,~-, ts<, c;. P[A rs. UCfPf ,,,., ao•c:O'I co~vnr~ ro n,r ,-;,rv r,r »r'ira'i ,9• "1-"r ,~,;rm,.,,,,, ».-c.Jc.,r.rn ~/~[us,~ 12 2006 .WDCP R[C()i>/A'r. r-,/() X)(,E•}•}C)D()H~. -~ w,.c; ~r,,,~,v, wp;h,~,;·r,,, VICINITY MAP . . . ,' ,, ·· 11111111111111111 i,~~~.,J.u00,~11s4 . m1rJ-J,.!'~\ . ' BCl[ING HtcA!. I Y COMi"ANY c,ry fJF RFNTON c<:J&f·· 'HS r,,v ,JC ,ou""( DC ~,~.-s I w ~~.:·~:.:.~:'..:"',\;;: '.It;,~ tti6,'""'--(u6,'l'1""""' .. , .. .,,, ___ '. ·•· ,,.....,. . .,,.,..OM ,,,,,.r,,,,!""'"°"'"'""'"Of'~" 1 /QP,{QN IA,' lJA TUM ~~?1 ~6 .. ,t~ti~> ;~ ';f.~~;;~J;~~/,'~cicV, TC V ;tN,iJ"r~r:; o•,,n~. L, ,,u · · _.. ,·· V~NCJM[~•; S~Cti'N .W'I< '-'a:Ju; IN •}8 20Q< PP'"A"Y . .,(",',,JRe~[~f fQ•,!i'"f~I ''1,.,.9!f 57,X) JPS AN;; ~/.'CA rcTM. '>'ATIO~:; r~lt ~fl/J [);1~,.~rn ro AS'U A'H,Sl[O ,c.,,,,.,, ... s,.•R'<IF' ,,,,,_,,, OfC nAVi .,, ~· rn;, 'he ,,,~, ,\'cAq •;.,~: •· ~ ,· ~-()'·cq;;·, ;10,,,~ .. fNT W/ C!P~<~ '<C~ .,, tJ.•Yt'I (.'-Sf n~.,.,. ; o· at.J>< ,s~"'' r ·/• sr;:•,c,· cJ~N/:'i h ,~.lB!: • I~~ f 'J.OOd't ;~~O -"' AC, SHOWI, (.;N RiJ,:_') 8".UU!.E.!lill CJ ~-,;;t; /1.R~'i'' J~,c,,,' ~,A; ~;: ~0 ;;~c ,;:.1;J~GO< ~ N I -~- SCA~[ ,.,c ·: bl!) sq ._, J/; .,..,,-.w.;i;· Rc5J5 IX1 Lr16< J< BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BIHDIHO SITE PLAN SE 1:4 SECT 7, rwr' ?Jr,·., RGE 5E \1\l M SW 1,4SfCT B, r,w, 23N.RGE 5f, WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ::c:, ro ~,r, ),-0/_!!/0,, S,},1',P -;v.'C.'iCC ~fT""-l•<K ;1(/,",(J"f~ f> A'; SH0W', ,J/,! Sl<[l T!, ;: <.'Ju j ! <h}C,, ,.,. "/< c"'JH ,U ("N,11 S(~') =~-==-~---=-"',c----,0-= .,~, s~ ,;, ~r.~~2J 5 LOT SA 6l9,004 C(/ 'i ;4_,il 0,c·es _'.2)~ e-r;u.so I!' ~,/A:,S C•P uc~"'"'~· '" C•IT W/ PVN~~ ,: ,a_rn,-x <'M AS ,'~;~'~.I :~?c.0 (i;.;o ijC".c°6,.,\ ('i! ~'"""':) !OC.'<) >i j __ , I -/,;:· .,, J BOEd"G RFAl TY lQMPA!.Y ----13~0 ... :·.,,, 'lillj.·p.,i,-,,,==1, ;: .. CITY OF RFNTON ,, ::'.' L: 0 ~ESHOR~ 0 LANDING 2 BINDING S.::E PLAN ~-r~ _=r __ ~--L J2614-SU.~v llo,b~.· ... bl(',(. ,~a •a:JZ.-,:-"~'t2 r••W""·"°"" . I ... /J<OC-.. 00 ,' _-' ,', I ,._,. . ..:.::.-·===-,===·:] :11111111111111 20080111000854 CITY O!' ~F.°" "'-°' I .... m1~~,1rJ1 BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 I I i I ':>( I .I '"'~ I -,.. I ·:i: I~ ~ I' I ' ,. CC' ' t 0~ ,ii<"""' s~OR: P[A r w~-at,-vo,-,Hµ( LOT 713 2?0,51.5 .,.r s c.-oc T r,c,: ~-,;~w.." I .>!" 9i0")%6>~~ ,; 11 11 >~~·.n'•B·r '""' r, ['~ d.•A-.'}7-'J4S-BSP JN!J-J5-C016 ,w]'•I ! C, . " L_ "' ' BIHOIH6 SITE PLAN SE 114 SECT 1. TW." 23N. RGE 5E. \/\IM SV'. !/4 su:r. 1:1 TW.'' 2.1 N. RGF SE. WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON .,:. . ; ,,or) Cl'Y CJ, Rt')..r(:/N $HO,,; "l-"'• UIA.:or,-OE•-->·'P)' ~[C liO -1,JO(H02<'/[X)·JOS "f~·ror. 1-"N?\< Ar:RE'AG[ v:x.,12/Jl BC(;(;,< 2 ::~--Ju ,o· 4• ,: •' CC~" .,JN~•Mf~r .'!,' CA'( ~/ COPP CR P/" ~ r S">ff' rNrr~,;rcr:001 },:~J:,'.11r Hf_r;;:_Q_RD_ [6$.£M£1:f[s__t_N_{J ACR[f:M[f,,FS Sd9"2B'nT 265C.--:r7i/< CO,,'°'''R srCf; O!J.2S '':· /,aROi.~ ro C,si;, ',ffl) .9fffR'NC[S (~. g:;:"';( :.'.~"c(" :ih'IO< r ~:Ar ?' -05~ • jl[C NO l0011)()590MJ,< 2 :-RrWRt or ,VR,t.Y /~~'~00.l ~:,'.hORT()I, ~[~~,5 ,I, AS50C/ACc5 ~ ~[A' QC n,~rr.,· FAR" •c~r,c, VOL :20,CPL""i,PG!> • c(;'l C•N! •O-','SCMC~' !.;A-00~-~0 ~t: ',C Ba,, '~9'"11 ~,~·m, <1,c~; ~cA• ~c,·,.,,,J e9c:•-s~Gb ---~ c•rv OF """ rQN ,:,or,,,.o, "a"'-'"'N' -~,- ,-' .-(.(!,.~ i,(.'!, ~! CGP~[A P'N •Ol-NU iJl',]jNG U011VM!"' ,1,1 (.';~, ACC(Pl!:C A5 C[.N!t~ l!f ,u··.c1,1 ~ Z! o 'I •OJ~.J ~9~C· ~; ;;,ii~ ~IOR[F C) ~ ;,o· ,,.._,,. 1NM;' < .,,uc·N'. RL"t .,,,::-".i~.l5,BO,-· N(/T r,orcto '.1tiS~,;.,;:~~·,•;,,.F(!R;;,i·'n,~" "' O~SCP'~"';,_ <;P~~·-,,,M.< ,., '(!I,~'" t ,,,,~; ) _,. :a ""'-"' .l.: s,o,~ALK ~AS[.r[~'S. ~cc t/CS J<J2'.20 &, J_<J1,i,c ,, "'''[R [AS[M[''', ,?[C ~o 1•J1"n . l] ,,,VQA, ~{,[P'{A"o,• B' ~•er,,[ :,JAs, ...... ,~;)A~ a(!""AW HU. ~o ,1562~4.G {f t LO-/ SA} :; ~;:: ;;;; f~~: f ~::g~ 1~~ .~g ;:~;:J /-KS.,m,,m; ·,·roR«;~ON ,.~··?OOuMn,r-m ,,,:rr11M1'!f {?CA no,., l5 ,o· c'T!c,,-, [,\S(-'(·"· Ri'.' ,NU .:,e.,-g5 "6 PGIO'["R [•S[U£~'. qiC ,u OllO.!:,/! ,~ &-,9 CA<; CAO("U[,>TS, ~,-,-~u; IJH}go;,~2 &-n~s~:io5~g 10 PaWcq ,.,sr,.,,,. etc ,·c· ,,c.;i,•01.iJ. Nor ,,o"£J (10· ,r~·P cr.,:nc,, .,, ,, ,u· vr,,,-y [AS(-'i/J;, e,c "0 11~~0,o~~~ 12 &-2< U"[ClY f•~IU{h''i. "!.C IJ05 '7tO()J0507 _,. 17, '~0~50 "" ," ,, •u A~~ JO''-'"'''' f'~l.,Chrs. ~fC "() ,;oa:~:!610 (,AlA.",o, '.>'/l' J.!21, ; ;e ~U~[~ ,~stMtlH, R[C ,·o ~,0,2~~~. "or ~,o•r[.? '.'G' orn,n CE~'D>D a, ,s-u:i,:.rw "~'l"'l~ u, ~ '"{!' i• .. ,sc' o, N ,:,o·:;, w, .'AJ ]1 PQW[R U5[>'[Nr. ~[C /JO. ~<'02&00-g: J ,'G!'t"R f•SfMf~' .. •fC ~0 "'5'2>609<7 :J2 PDl\r~ [AS[M[s;. ~,c NO 8s,,,~M•'i. NOi P(Cf/£0 .'C"[~·,cRW r;+, A£-,cr<cFO t:<(."ILJr,£5, J:J vn,,-ry [AS[o./fN1, R[C ,o &;12;/Jl61J, MOOmrn B( rili NO, B90B19G4'l :J< ACCfS5 AM) P.<RK•NC fAS[ll[NI',. H!.C eJQ~ ~~C22<0o!W5 &-aWJ21'~B22 :J~ PcJl\rR f"ASfM[.sr. R[C NO 880/!JQQ'.i;j? J~ S,O[WAi.K & urru•,-[A5/:'l[NP, R£C NO, t!llOZ'ONJ. NOW FALC'i /,~ ?AR, Alf N ~/h 19 unur, EA5£.rfNf, REC NC B90BZ~O"<IC ·~ R~At.WAY SL&( & swuu,~ f.<S/:M[N \ R[C. NO B9QB.l~Q<BP <,,.,N!c,ry Fl,Sl"WNT. R[C NU 8!'10~0<'~ -12 R[s:11,Gfl()NS, (ON[J,TJO,,S. oc,n-,,,o", ~o·t.s. £•S£~c:,rs ,,~ PROVl.'i.'GIJS 0~ c•r, Cl" Ri.,"ON ,~o"' P[A' NO Q9J-~, Ri~ NO a91,i,goc,; •J JF/1'<5 .U/0 PRO·~~·u,,·,; cv,,r.v,w :~ '1R[ .... ,., ·~<FR-n[ AGWf>'l"I,/; BfTWf.t,· ;J-'f !IQ(!NC CO .. P,~Y MIO lh£ c,rv <)F R[NrON. R[C NU 9lOS<J'')~ l"t") ,~ NOR r>< Q<" J.~rr•scerrc-. or 81), .,.0 P.<R<) (~OE5 ~o' M'EC r ',()B,l[(T Pri()P[H r,., :~, -~tL:J;.'Dflt ,m0£1t HfC. NO, "'~~0~5~: •• 1t0W[lt C,\~llfNf. R!C /JO 920'1J01i~' <~ POW[R /:A,f"flNJ'.>, ~!C 'lQS 9<1'2W~2J ~ 94)').J-:!!Of. •7,,:,t/\!l,_N•Nr:,, w~"'C'ONS, lt[S17''C"O'IS •ND/OR fAS[M[NCS ,,, oocv,f." R[W%i"D ~ND£'' SC( N']_ 9>0!•, .. u. 8[WC A R(-HlCW'Q'NG <..f'RIX '·110. ~oC</20/!5~, · ,. ·.•~ L'(Nl.'«iANI~. GQNO'OONS. 'llf;S17''Cfl0NS '"'010~ c,sr .. (N)S IN swrHPORT _,. NO/,-OPPOS1,,o:, •GRffi,£~,. n[(' ~o JQOQllrl()O(l!d' ..... w,t~~·~. ::.;mo,o~~s. 1tctr;,,icnoNS •M:1/()R fASf.r("'' •ff NO 20GQ'117(>GrJ5• (F"Rr"S "f/OP[R,·,; (OOCS NOT M-,--!:C' ~1.i~Jf(,'J P"vPf.~'') ; ~~ ~ rr~~/rc1tr.'.'.~~;: ·;~~~~·~.;s ~~~'"!fs~~2i,o~f '?g,,~~,~~t .. : ~~~".?\f;i~H°h~:'c'".~;;,;c;,,,o~~f ff{{f:t7:;3';/'.~~;'f~.000 ' 6 J' R!r: N~' l'W"l2J·:>OtB~6 !'J CO,t.N•-~rs. co,01co~1 ,,,sm1cnG'Js HjD/OR fA<,fMr.~;s ~E ~a l00<"22Bl>J'8 ,, ,. f!;H~~ <SU PRO','!';,O"s ~(),~TAJl,/[Q_,v "S1l>'r.,nr~ sr.R[[~FNT'" 8fCIO'["(N [H( aucw,/ ('"""'·" ·~·o 'Mf r__,.•y V R[N•o~·. "l, . .I,/'.) · 1~rJ6:i~woo•OJl 10::wG~::nc;; P~OPfRIY) :nor,,:,,or MFf.C' 5'JWCX' PR(#iH»': . ·-~ N SCALE :;.; '00 --: r,u) ' ,NCI, ,au ~o P~O~[.OTY CCJ~WRS ..,,: il£·~'4,:C.: » ~.~, V ,.,., e,NO,NC 5,;,; Pee~ "'-'fro c""'i;f [.O'IS"'v,eo,., -co:-,·s.0;;-s-.,.n0N'; ,~,' ,,. "t,L l.<t -,t:"vcc d' ·:';f BX,N~ CWP~N~ 200 BOEING RFAl ,Y COMPANY CilYOFRENrDN ,_or~----- <OT )A Jf!1 5C . l~f so' 67,189 ,/ <:'C(li) '-""--'"-------,.1_ r;c.~,J ,or ,·~, ,,. .,__ 4 __ '?~;·2· , .. m~~_:_·: 15,0B~ G,16 LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN FIL~ :0•1. ;:;1J~- Jl6,4 Wl"IE~ A!:•:OAOLO 8~ r,,AN r·' O'l,cec,jtt,a;:;rr;,,i:1.,• ~ .. n1un Cit, f<a:I 1055 Sc"1h Grildy Wr-t F..e~\oc, WA 9!\0M BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN Sic 1/4 SECT 7. TWP. 23N. RGE 5C, W.M SW 1:'4 SECT 8. T'NP 23 N .. RGE 5[.. W.M CITY OF RENTON, KING COVNTY, WASHINGTON ~"-•· •~. PCOPci. f:/' r"t':,t uu,;~~·:, '~•' "l. ·.~< .·,"Jl"'i'C~r: 0.-.Nf"S ,, •. ~rCR!:S\·1~ ;"' :•,,c ~uo:1,, [;'lSCS:d,o ,o "('•lB• ... ~-, A B,.,o,~~ Y"f PlA,S P!·"5J,~"' •o ,..,,,fl·c~ °"' ' "._ ~ ... ~ ~u::~~, ··•t. ~-~'.).,'/(, '.,, ;[ """"' 'J "' ~ _,:;.;,.,,~,·: "' ?~, ''·" "Y)N ,:,, Sal.<(" •~J '"A' ;4,q ;,,~J,~;:; I", ··-~~.,.,,or"'"' 9ff ~or,-s,N-,~J ,~· ,-,c~~~""'-.t'!: "'''' '1,r .>c;·mr QC c,'!·:J""L~S · • /Z.rf?-Z..C7f77. ___ _ rl<T CrAJN'Y .~c 'OS ANG/I.CS ! ,s J«~~-1, ___ /0~, </("<(/fli '-'[ ~..tl-~--------N/)T;f,YCIJ/>l/(, N~;,-,,,,,~,,y A?0 [,qf,~ .li::)i...,. f:x:.h.""'11.u,____. µ[R~UN"•l[Y mom '0 >,[ (Q/l. P"QV£:, fo!J"r ~N n;[ n,,;,s. f-x~u'Z~~;g";cr~r;~,;/ ,',~ ~,;~.'rr~'~;'.~",;::}?~~ ~:,":~~,.;,'.;;fz~~,;~~-~~,.;"~h~";:;:;i'J;';ft'1' '·'0 5,JN•'~"' o, "'[ 'N-''"~"r'' ,~[ ?[.S'.,Q•, o~ ,..,, [.,a" ~~:}N /J£H<,• .".;, ,,,,,~·,, ,H Pl".S()I, •t·,;-,? •,rcc-:rc ,,,r ·,~,R""'"'' APPRO'IAI S C/IY 0.' R[N!Of>!_ ADMINISTRATQH Or' f--'Lt..NNll'/G / f,iJ•LO.'NG / PUBLIC -NORK.S KING CU/JN.fr' O~P,MHV[Nr OF ASS[5SM[Nf!:i" c""'~i,J •~,) •o~qr.,ce '"'~ 1l.I."i ___ J•v ,,, ,·_'fut,4~~ -' a¢ ~JT N.o~I~ __ _ ______ ·/'~·-·_j':/6z1Gf1,i ,,L ~rx .. ,,. •1·s,,.srm :,w ,, •:•,c CO'·~·, ,:;,r;,:,!l L_AJli)__ Si!P. k'[YO.R'S_ CfRTIF!(A rf / 1,'A-07-048-BSP :._[CAL O_[SCf~/PT/Qt,.' OF 'X,'STING PARCF"/ S '"'"''""'' W\v',,At,'i CCNi>A4Y[~"M'fl.'FNt /1/) ~'S ;,.I!!,/~, WA". JAf/,) •AWH~ g_ C A~O C APC N1' A ~•P' (II f'J,:, ~JI,'~/"','~ lr!t ~[AN ,~, A, ~"',)I'~,.-.,~, S"~~r p;_,c l/[;'M80k '.Js.<-110. "'D"LJ>J 1/(0'tlM~tP ;,. ,~e~ <,NO[,S '.,c c;,v~Yy A(,;-QR~:~:; ~~-~~''"'""-'" o, Ql.'.'C,'A( "':ooos_ UCf,'T ,-,,., ocR;,oN CVW!.YCO 'LJ CHO (.'rev O' R[N'ON Bf Oc','' C!.OC,\l CfEQ P[CO~Q[D ~J',r.ieCP Y. ,,~, .,~~!~ q,(.'0""'''(,' .,c t~1'0!'()<'j OF DIF'C,•. RtC~ODS ,,, <'"IC cou~·ry ,.ASMIG'~M -cso n·,vrmr.,· r..-arlt•P:>« •H•• Po,;r,o>, -:o~,ufJ ,c oYf CHY OF ,1,~r:J~ er Off~ ~fCCJRC!fC A[;'Gcl>' '!, }".)QI) v~vtn rll(_'()rlLJ'NG NG 20060i!1700(;!'B ,'~ ~'~" coc1~;y ,,.,sH,~CTC~ •O'S'· /. J, ••NG~. B!.OC~ 3. R[~CGN FAR>,( •fQfoG[. A((.Y.)P?QJ~(, r•J 'HC r,,r n,[RfC. "tr;OR,'")(D "" V(Jl~M/: •2 ~· PLAfS. PAG[ P . .'~ Kl~G r.;LJ:;Nl"Y. WA>"•''GPON UCE?f ,~rnffl?O« IHt NI)'"" JOOO ,nr l)f SA/!) w,, (."l)~Vf.rf.D 10 ,,., CVY o, ~£N'O•, FOil $'11[<· PJRP05[S, "'DER RECQPQrNC NO ,,al!<l~9 0, 0,f,c'<L Rff(IH(}C, ,.,_,c fXCf?f ),'A' PO/IP'.),/ CQ"/Vf.r!O re fl<f o•rr r)F Rl:.Nfr;,.• BY C',<A/ rN;C.~'1,((/;1 ~c(.'(!e!)I.;.' !)[CfM,qf" ,i. 1(1()6 C'~Oi:R R[C0Ri>1NG "/0 2006tll200CJJ;l '~ K,Nr.; C(,v~·r,. ,o~;,ri,c•ON. ·ocr;,-,p ...-,~ /Hf; NC"''"' ,'A,.-Qr ,-,~•'cO NC"'"""' ~r~o,1 A();()<,V•N(.' ~~() IH~, ~ORM~ r.r AL.Tr s(),(}'N,'~,; 01< ,,,, Wf;T A~ "'(.'Arco (!N()lH (_'JrY (.II' "l~'(!N LJ"OINM-IC/. ,·o JJ19 A,O "[~CJROCC .,., 2,. ,9,, UNOi:R Kl/JG We'~" ~R'O,<(!J~G 1/() 13:,:,z106iZ ~F OrF'CA: R[CCJR[!',, '~ K:~~· ,;,:}(!N'Y, ~A,,<IV(.''l)'I rllf: ~'ORTH )r'.<()00 /ffr or_-'t-,.,, [AST •CDOC 'ff' lli "'' ~'-"''H"!c"I' WA~,,~ o, [/-If sor,~,~rsr OuA~T" OF S~C"cl<'< 8, '"?""S"IP 2J NORn.. ~AN~[ :5 ,~sr ll"LlAJ.f[r/t ~rR.'D.'AN, ,~ K,% cuunn:; WA)H/N~'."JN. CfC(M "''[R(FROM 7'-Jf: NORf>< f;OOO Ff[T f>,[R(Of, l'0/-1".t""!cU •a ry[ c••Y JF '"~'J" T~R ,;p,:r, PU...,0S£S r/>1D€R RECORDrl-lC ,,,., .. ~!" ;rBotrB> O" u»,Q~l Pl'::OR!.'~ ,. ,~ r.<cfF r 11<1'\fFROM n.,, POR no~ '"t"l'-" t ~NG "'1y11-1 ,,_,, w.c~ r ·a cl(] cirr c::r [YA: ?O~~IY'}.° OF ~J(/~ N()R,r JW 00 n;rr ( YWG ~'OU r"C"l Y 0' r,,,_ C, >; OF S[A r,;_c l»A.,SM,S',/~ u~i: .,,,:,,,-or-WAY, WYIGH WM, LJHUI.D ,o r1-11 CifY :,,· OfN,ON ~y Q[i:0 ~t,<:r'!ilfC (j~C,fR RfGORO.'/-IG NU J,n,J; Of Oi"••OAL OfC()l<DS. Ac50-Txeeh TH[Ro;'!lo" "'"' P()/l"ON . .,_,,c,. ,..., ~ffQW TC /1,f CITY OT ~[NTON 9, OffO R(Cil•,,~ ~t '· ·~~~ '-"'UI.~. ,c,·c·ROJ% NO i/~010~19 J, OFFID"1 ~fCOR.1<; '"'a UC-IY' ,~Ar P:,ii~:.,,;'co,vv,~"~·.'":! "'~ c,r; er ~,/-1,o,,:.av n,~r l~S"IU~FNT ~[CO~.~{D ~i([«Of!I ,1. }Ofll, ~I-IOEP R£:o•cr1-1c ~(J ,10,;6'2'2C00!08 r,s:."'~.:: CWNr)' W~S!HNC1CN ·o~, •~D i·oc ,er ,r,.,,·,;_:,:uS·:,.,,.~,. ,o •J~ B8. ~,:·o<>lrn ~Ci.~"'~'~'"· ,wi; ~NcJrn :,;u..r,,,:,,vc, ,a d8H'~9~~, o, (),,,f:A', "<.".'O~U'>. ·" •we ,;n,w,·,. "''5""''-'0" o,iR~, s.:5 :,'.JC:. !ltJCK ;_.•'1[NTC~ CAR,! AWrA,Jt ACOl,PJN AXORJ·~~ 1J 'W ~,AT -,.UlffJF . Off()~J,!J II,''?°-"'"',:, or:.P<AI/'. PAGF l1. ,, y;,i,,;·co,wry·wAS1<,N,:Tv'J. T,;)G("'..f" ''"'1 r,r 50</nl I/Air or {M:A'[() """"' "'' Sr;,;'f,T AOJry~··~c_ ., CACAT[D c,mi~B: ;,n-'X R[NCQoi• OP~tNA~C( ~G . .J.l,<"7, .. : <c50 'r"oGf'Hi;,I "'"' [\IA' PO!!.'"!ON er ,cln AOJONNC O(\' 1/i[ otrsr, .;cAC[i> WJO€R :FY o, R[NfOli OROIN~:..;:[./00 -<0-<8, A/{!J Rr:;?{l~FD IJ<.~CP ,r 19~1 vvnfll l>[CO!'OINC ~o BlO.J:1vs1.!. OF omC1A1 R•rnr,ns · Par>C[c A -I cJT i. 0,C'<:-'K '· ""':.~~-";,9i, ACS'[ .. C[ A:>:,,Oi)~ ACCo~o,~.~ ,a n,r 01:.: T),~"f()C ~(C'~H<!W "' '/!Jlc''II "7 l)f'-P!A'5, ;"<Gf H, ·~ ~'~G CQCN[>, WA_;1.,NG'O.~. 'DC("'l" "'"' '"'' PQ'fr()'l QF ,1·,n sil.\J,4/NC ON '1•f ..rs,. ·J•CA'TD •!ND[~ c:• .,~ lls,·roN l)PO,'NANC[ ~o •0•1r .. ,....,,; lf~CORD[D "A""'' .,_ •9n? ,.,or.o Rnc,;n,,-,G ,,~ ro.',"05'B 01 OIF,C!A. l>fCiJ~il5 .o,) A/-1~ '~•v P. 80ftNG L•Xf5HJil[ c•NIJ'~G. A BIND,~G ',•;;-o,,~ /lrCGRJro ~rcr"~"" a CU(!< cWO[" •rco•o""G -,o 700• •n.Joooa.16 ·~ ·te, ~ ... r n5. •A·7f.~ aJ C'"'ROVC~ 6/i, Jf PJ; ,:<;. [~C(Pr Tl"' Oi)p~(";N :;;:,,,·,[YfD 10 Tl<[ ·Cll'r o, Rc,·,c~ 8~ ~~., ,N57'i"'"·"'' ~rco~ncD G[C[.,O[D ''· 2006 ,morn Pi:CO/l.,,4G N(/ l(YJ(,ll1,0ll:'-l,~. ,~ '"'''· GO!,N'Y. HAi"'""',J>.' --OF .~,~I',, BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDIHB SITE PLAN SE //4 S!:'CT 1, TWP. ?3!\i, RGE 5£ VIM sv, j;~ SECT 8, nvp 23 N., RGE 5E., WM l~Q.~l?b';'iA-' ~ CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINOTON ,o ~~t~r~;:~"Z:~~-:s ~; ·.ri:~~z~J;~,,;,,;i~ :cv vnN11.,r,•,s ~v, •;, ,> ,.,, , ,•~(~)«cV''j 5,-,{)>ft;.•fHt .. ,~,,~ 0 .,~ /;~; ,, ~~'""''· ,.,,s~·qc~~~· ,-o•,.'f'.,E~· -~ .... ~,, 5700 ~;.,:, .,,J ;,:,cA r,,,., S'ftC,()/,; ~~-· ,,,, c~""'·~-:~ •o "'.l "-" ,.,re: ,.,,,~,;, "••;,;~·,cv c,,1'!"Hf~ il•Stc'S• M"'~ f~C ;>1C ,r,,,o r~ "l'.l , " x ,-co,:'iC -,- .,C,)Mf·,r ~"/ 'Of'"(< CA:< "' DP'),<(•, c,sr JO"'" : 0 dtc,~ A<;P.,A,. '/• ,re·.,,, cc,,,~,, ~ 'BJ~" 089 ~o'J,~~i: ~;1",,,o (,) Cl;> QF ~[~'~N Sl-'()SH P,AC '--' BGr,,,c ,,,,,~,. Ja .,,,; ~c 1?'-'".iC19,·oca" ' ~$:_ j ~jB g ~ N I ®- SCALI:_ 1c)J I .'E:~T) -")C ~· ·~rn:; sa ~~ J 16 ~~-,:, ,r,,·j~'.16"· .a~jJ3 CO" L •15< 7' 2'.Xl ; iii ~i ;. ; N89J7'0<"" 1a a, ---~·?•r:r.·,n n,•,!' ",,,... ,~ '/< >c(" 11 '''1"" .,, ,,- 1 NJ ~~toa;uu ~=~:; i ,, j d£.£fOI ~. ! ' 11-, 1 LOT 5A 619 C04 sq. '' ,.,11 o,,,e, BOEING R!:Al TY COMPANY Cl TY OF RENTON ~i.'i 'J c,•v o, NCN'UN ;,liler, ca,n;,oc N>"n.v•,,: MD~c,J,JrH 'S A; SM')'M CN Shff"O 2 ,,op J i"6 ,, a,,,,-0,~, ('~ RE/,IM!) ?l,O•) 5c ' ' R[/\'TQN SI' 09] .. b9 89\11~9{)05 ' ., \_ l .. _.: J~>o ¥< ... ,. vm; p.,1-,,., LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN -----~-] ,,,_t~. "••~'~'o_, "_"_.-•. -. , __ -__ aon 1~,-- 'lt.•, fON. K~!,~ [?f/(J,J['"' ,W) ]2614 ~~Sc1N'.,T'.)t; ] c;:~~:~~u;~~,a~·~;·~"~ __ ] 1...,.,, ... ,. . .,....,,,,,,...,. : ,,....,.. . __ ,, _,,._. """""·~-......,.,...,,. ' I IL_ I I f- ' ' ! ' I ' JI I ' I ' - ---_-, I LUA-07-048-BSP :1111111111111111 20080111000854 ffifffl!"ir.~AT 1• .. •1..,;.oos.w,,,UO> BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 LOT 78 2?~!.67J.sr t_[;, E•S~~~; ' I>' 9,'~!U'.1651~(; ,; '> u,o-55 0011; BIHDIHG BITE PLAN SE 114 SECT !, n•tP. 23N RGE SE., WM SW 1 14S£CT. ~. TWP 23N.RGE.5E, WM CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,cor :i , Qf R[•'l-.ro~ 5HO.C ,,..,, .... e;_c'~~f'6~,9o2r:Jow; 11;_1,f!\' rAi?M ~CRfAGC .-01_'17/Jl .. !3i._-O(K 2 ? -JO?()' ,·,,·coNc MONI!"'"'' IN c~sr WI ~O~PFP P!/.i A I ;mrrr 1N1co;rcr,r;1, N •8J,J;8226 / ,y~;,'8,,J._j•D EIQ;.IB? 'A5FM[WS_A/1i'D AGR[[MfNTS Sl19?8'),T 26~D :.S(r;, w,, fOc,,,R 5£~ 6JJ 26' (':I ~M,D£N fO (.'NJR 5[CT.) f:LE£BiHlli ·.7T.: c,ry or llfNm~ s,mnr ~lAT 01 056 's.)_ ~OH% P•RC[l .)8 ·_~EC NO l']C'12059'XlOO• 2 ,:~fC()J>O OJ S~'RVt' 1~0~)190\,) S'!' ,o,_< re-, 0£11,'15 ,I: ASSOC,A 'I.S J HA) or PC\ITON /"~!>" ACR[AG[ V1X '' QC PCAi'i, i'U Ji • cor ''"f •.;,JI.!~'"''" \,A-0W-B8 i>f:. 1,0 BB'1'Sl>00r 5 :;,c:'/'()"<1(N_'ON" S1'"1lf P'.AC 1>:f'09J-8',. ~tC",:~0 B9r,I•9006 __ ,_ j/'9 C/TY OF "f.~CO,i CO/.ifROi MO,Wll!NC ;~,, ,. < •· CONC l.iO/.i "/ CO;>P[O ~'" rOUNC [.(15 nNG MQNJ,l.f[N' 1/.1 CAS[, ~CCfP rro ~s C[IHfO Of Si.UKJN s-n-; N •eJe2J09~0 ~,'-~t~•: ;§:Doer 8 ~ xi· SPUR m,c, E~S1"£"'· ~l'c. ·110 ··;~J:,aQ,:-',,o, P,O;'I.~ (rl>'-S~, ,,i,i-~·fi',,-a,,..,:~o" "•' of5,,,,~rr/-i~. S!>L''i--~Ace ~1 , 01,·ccQ rrisrs; ~-'" .'? 1,·nurv <* 5':>fWA,~ USE>jrnT";, Rr:: t/CS. J!JltlO &: J_•!2•2,o r, WAT(:;? U50•U<r. R!_'_C. NQ J•Jltll ,. , ' ll "'>/£RAC OiS[R'<Ana,.· Bf PACJFfG COAST ;i,1,1fPOAD CO!JPAll'i. RfC /JC .•to~~ (f B wi 5•) 'J SAl,.'f'RY ~[ll'[R 0A:i/"~f"NP. ~tC. NO. ~•J6<+'.•, : :· ,-·· '4 SAN,'f'RY ~,111.~ ,~,i:~il-Jf, RiC ~o. ~·sw,r/'l'<S"JFr,-,c,rNr .'NFOR1JA"ON "'·OLlCL~r,.,r 1D or:ir:RJ,<11./f i-rx:.r,c>11 ;:; :o' U''(,rY [A,c(l,l[Nf. ~f~ NO sa,9,95 ·: ,· , . . '.6 PQLi£N (ASf"fNf. RfC /JV 6<'6l-"' ::, ... -. ,• ~~ ~~:1):~s't ... 1~"f"R1c ~ig -~~~n,',i'~}J1'~~.,, !,~;ff5WJJ\,,.,P ~ENIERfD °" ,s-,ou<f~ Fm:nts 1>1 w 50' oc tor ;µ/ l' '~' UPIII/Y f,S[WENT, R£C >10. 7109070596 ·: . . n j-<• ,m,:" i:-,Sf>j[Nf'i. qi:C N()<, n,QOJ051J! &, n,usos56 .... , . 2~ ,c· AND ;o· (ln:_,TY [ASE .. CNT,, q[~ NO 7908'J067C ('IA(;ATION (!{<.') Jfn) U PO.+ER E:AS[J,<[NI, N[C NO. 810,1.io~~~. NOr PLorrm (,o· Srl"P CfNTD/fO a,, ;7 i'OWf~ USI. .. ENT, PfC NO, 8<'020D!in ·. ~~ ~~~; i~t~'i:i~i. ~~~--~~-:;~;~:!~. "0' PWCT<.O ·'CW!:HW ()IJ A$··LD6:rro ... C/[•n;sJ .lJ U'llfTY l"AS!J.1[~1 Rff. NO ~12lJ1!PJ, 1,100/'1£0 8Y N/C. NO. 8JU629C<?l . JI ACC(',5 ANO PAR,n"'-, lAS!J,<[~T';. qF:;, NOS ~Ol2<0805 ,I, B~OJ/j.')aU JI PO\<t£R fAS[,.,fl-/T, fflC HO, Bl!~B~00~7 JB 5/D[l+'•LK ,I: U''L''v f;5fJ,<[N', fft(; -~0. BE'~}le'2'J. NOW /All~ 11,f ~AP< AV\; 'i Q/~ 19 ~"';[, ,v (;->f!•f~ ,, P[C ~c B9CU>O•~o <r. POADWA' S,,_()<'( &, S/c!E"AL~ fASEM[I-I', fffC 1-10 ~,D!nC-!<!1 41_.,mi.,,[)' fAS/",.,f/iT, REC 1<0 B,1'0>0"5 -·~ P[S;//•cno1-1s, CO/./llr'10NS, DfQ'CA.",Q"S .. ~o,n. f•S[Mf~T, ,WO ~RCV,SIOl-<S 0-', C!'Y ,_;, ffoN.'UN :,X()R PCAC N:J 095 .. ~9. R[C NO E911,.9J06 <J '!:'iM$ "'/; P.•a·~s,o,·s w,r1LN[O ·" nm: "A'" 11,f)f~-Pf A~Nrw1-1: BU"(<'' 'l'f !JQl•I./~ C()"~"'Y •~ .. , .,., ('" <)F q[NTQ~ Q[C N~ 9100}!"~~ (l•(5 fcI HO,,'!< C,," JN'EQ5/_CTf0N 0, 8/h Al>fQ S;R~j {I.J/J!S NQr A(>[O SV/L'[C' O~Gl'fRfYJ {Rf .. q[~Off~EU ~·~~!" ~[C 1-1~ ••:n,:l60988j " ~J"l:Q EA51:"t·' ·. "n. ~o no,, Jo.~· <5 µ,:_,"'!:ff fAS!Mi-~''· fff~ l,fG5 9,;,nmn « ~"'<NII,/6 <? eo<l!i.NA/;r5 Go,,u,no,,·s. Rr,n,,,no1-1i •NO/OR f•SfM~l,f') o, O(XU .. l'N' ~,~ol'O[O ~NO[R R[C N"O 9?0J1~'4l2 Uf,N(! • 1'£--~iCrffiO,NU (),''/llC )I~. ~112/2011~5 ,, . i~ CO\lff/ANCS. r;o,.·o•ncws. ~i~1wcno~s •NO/VO' P~!Mc:l>f:~ rN W'-' ft-<P()Pr <* 1->0'<-IJPPOS!O()I,' <CJ!ff"r,·r_ Arc '.a 200011, '000~Jt ···~ c~vttl!,.~TS. w>10•11ol-is. Rf$11<rcnoN, ANO/OR ("ASc .. cN1), Rt(.' l>fO 2000Hl7Q0'.XS• (FR'r"S PROPfl'fi'; /OOfS ND' •rrf('T SUBA"C' "~OP!.,Y) ~~ « ~1 !l!.-C:L:it'"!"''·"•OJ>fCMC~f$ BU\>l:[1' f><[ BO€."NC GO~P,~Y AMO "'' c,:--r Of R[N10r; RfC N05 WO~tn()(){!n• i 2XJ'2'000'~)1 !il '!R"5 r_'c,\~J#hf~ CONQ,C/CWS A.VO ~fST1'r(fr0NS CONTAINtO 'N 80!'.!NC cAK['.<,,Oq[ CAN,:ir.c fWOIN~ s,rr P(A-~ ~-·•-o•-~B'-IJSP, R[C NO, 2001':!lJOO();i~~ . . .. ~J co,'!'HANT';, CONO!Il;JO-!S. ,,,~n11c.·,1Q!!s 4/'ILJ/0/1 iA$£M[NC";,. Sfc.' NO JW•l.U80()1~?' 5< rt~.,, ANO pqov,5,oN; OOJ'HA!~/.U.<h ':i!ll'M.'U[/1 ·~11,r,.,rnr 1/F~l:N "'" 60('NG (;().,P,,,, AMO TH( C/CY or R[NCON, RfC ,,.0, )~~~200010J2 (~,:)N~ACRE$ PJ>OP<RIY) (00£S,.,.')r .,,n·, :x!e--tr;' AA()PfRfr) ~ -@- I SCA!../:.- '° I ( FffT ) 100 I • ,>!(co ~ !QO ii :LJ.QJQ ·· 110 P~0P[~•Y CQR/i[Vi Pl'lll 8~· PCAl!D AS PARC Oi '~I~ ~I/JUI~~ 51'/: ~CA.\ our,:ro r~%'Rr, cONsmucnON t0,,'5'0E!lJ' 1/0NS. r~~' "R" ,;;__'l ~i:-~tra;..CD .;/;:,,. ~oc.~G':cOM~~~Y ··'"., /31NL,),l,i.iG <;11£ ··p, AN AR(AS ;_')rs.· ___ _ :__."::!Z ~_A___ ~l!;~~-~- c'c'C;C,a~-~·, .;._~•:'_ __ :,.:;_• __ _ ·:.-. ' 'll',02( • 1i "/Jr .IC LO!~. 1~· .If : ~,~,, .~ '" '"' l -· ... , rn BOEING REA! TY COMPANY I CllY or RENTON : LAKESHORE LANO/NG 2 BIND/NG SITE PLAN ' RU, TQtJ _!: 02_____ ___ _ f1'AShl_'.:,'G_~~ ' ["C-n,c ,, ,v I '" ' ,-,, '•'" I 1· _,o~ L J2n14 J26 4 suRv asm owe i .1:J60 ..-oqlo Vl/J• ~:,h•t -1 llo!b•II ~ubJJv<~n •~~, ,~7< r~ .... ~-(ffl/f9J-- -·-'-·-· -----~~--~~---------.... ,, 0 • For Ten Dollars ($10.00) and ~th~7 good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Granter, tbe Grantor, Parkside Partnership, a Wasbington general partnership, hereby conveys and warrants to The 0_ Boeing Coapany, a Delaware corporaU.on, the real property described ·.:::-: ' • as follows: deed That portion of the south 660 feet of the north.west quarter of the south'ii'est quarter of sections, Tovnship 23 Jtortll, Range 5 East, W.K., in Kinq county, W~shington, which lies north of the north line of North Sixth Streat and between the northerly ertension of me centerline of Pelly Avenue North and Kain street, nov Wells Street Korth; EXCKPl' that portion thereof conveyed to the city of Renton by recorded August 19, 1971, und2r Recording N\lllber 11,.:00190152. This conveyance is aade expr~ssly subject to the following aatter.s; 1. Real property taxes, conservation cbarges and public 4ssesS11ents, if 4ny, becoal.lK! due nfter the date of this Deed, 2. Ea.1oe.t1e:nt& and th~ tenas and conditions thereof recorded under J::inq County Recording Kos. J4J2120, lU2121, 7111290292, 770502058~. 77DB1707])~ 85121609f9 and 86ll0Jlfl4. 100'Z/M; 11'"'5 TM1~/WflCIIUlH 7710010507, .,. 7711180656, B512l609f"J, ... ;-_;\I li,:fJ .' / ,'i {'' _ ... , \ r;-n_r: ' 1 ,. r • . ;"-~\Sf..'F. l"· "''" C 0 C °'~ 'IS • C C C "' C " ,_ ,. "' "' ~ ' • a ' a • " " • "' ~ ' l ' i -i I I • • I I. -~ (. , I r CZ) "f' ~ ... "f' 0 ... 0 "' :7l • () • • 3. su=vey exceptions diGCloaed by Exception Ho. 34 in Transaaerca Title Insurance Co-itaent No. 863073, Survey Job I 75066, date<I I>eci?llber 8, 1994, prepared by Bai.a ii Holaberg, Inc. Dated; January 4, 1995. (Grantor) Parkside Partnership, a Washington general p«rtnership _,_ ' . ---~ ..... • • 1 J I I • • I • • • STATE OF WASHINGTOH ••• COUNTY OF KING j on this __Jj1__ day of January, l99S, be.tore •e, the undersigned, a. Notary PuJ:>lic in and for tbe Sta.:te ot waisbington, duly co-issioned and sworn personally appeari!d Eugene Harbach and Michael R. K,istro, known to ae to be the ~rt.ners of Parkside Partner.ship, the partnership that executed the foregoing instnment, and acknowledged the 1,~id instr..ment to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, tor the ?UIJ)O&e& therein Jte.ntioned.,. and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instn11tent. I certify tbat I Ju-: :w or have satisfactory evidence that the persons appearing befot'e ae and -.alting thia acknovledqae:Jlt are tha persons wbose true signatures appear on thie docuaent. WI'i"NF.SS ay hiillld and official ff.e41 hereto affixed thq da.y and year in the certifiC4t~ ADOVe t~. 1~;1/4/fl Tll~I a'hstate of '"'" 1 l I • • L WH[N H~CQROfO !Cl[ ; Jr\N !(. Off= c,11!,eCr;yCw< P,ac.1onr.1tvha'.I Hl:>5 S<lLJ1h Gflll.ly W~ nenl~o V,,A =~ BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN Sf fi4 SECT 1 nNP 2JN RGE !>£ WM SW !'4 SECT 8. rwP 2] N. RGE 5£ W.M CfTY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DLCi .Ats A noN ·~ow A(.( Pf;OPCC ii' "Hf~! ~P[Sfi;s ~A._:\\£.,;[ L"{O["RS'GNELJ o\11'1£'i:; ~· NYC?ES{d~· r~t: ~ ... ,c ~CPJ:IN OE.>Clj;a,;o DO Ht'iif8Y Mf,{[ A 8rNO.NG .wr PLAN PU/IS/,'A/IT TO S'iA,,7E,O !,d ,, ,; (; ... ...,0 DfCLAR[ • ..,, !iJoO,NC s:rr PL~N ro llf A_.(Jll>1'1i(C REY!it'x.NIA_UON_ \)F SAMC M'LJ ·~4' $Aq !ifND,,,,_C s·,, ~cAN rs MAO[ .... J/1 ·""ff ca.vsu,1 :A~'O IN MCCRLJ~ ..... ,H n,, C>c>"'C O> ,eE-:O...,..,£RS . • ,. ,' ·· -· · . 12.,1?-z_c,:::_7__ ,,, ,.,. ; 5S (JN"l:L.«~ \! . n_C'c'. a;r~,"lf u[ ~-~•""-__ ~o•A>i, ou;iur "f,1';,-,v,,:, AP"OACD .k'c---~iS.. .. ___ , Pt~SON>:, Y mo-re .,f MR pqo,ru fo i.",-J,, ~;i:-iA5'3 ~Kt~•.;;;~;g~~Q[:f'':.:£! ~i ~:f;;\-~[~.~?"~:..•f~~ ~::~~:~H~~;',i~R,~~~.~~,/~r-1~''.':;:;'i:;11}~iN' ONG ;·:;~•.\.'Hl (.IN IH! ,.~;r,,v.,,-N: -~, P[RIO~ N :~c r.~nn UI'~ 8[/IAC' GI "'1'C.Y '"' P[~\()N •/;'fD . ,·rc:~,o fH[ ,~S"'•'"'°"'· C:IY or R[NT'j/cj_ AO!vlll,'."SIRAiO-'< (),• µ;_M,!r,',','J(; l·~()'LO;NG I 0 UGUC WORl(S KING COUNTY OEPARTM[NT QF" ASS(SSMEf,!TS .. ~c"rn' ,,,,, .• , ·-A "'·' o·,u·~~ ::1,12~:';;,' . 7/''~ano~ ,c .JJ,•f , c/ i.UA-'.J/··)48-89' !.,~D·J5-0Cl6 ;cc,,,c , un~O"r , "J,NG .5 a•Sc~ c"C·~ '<l 6 ,,~~-'"'" n ,oo;~ ~ANG[ 5 r•~· J•s;,s :•. ""' ,~c,,., :oP~<.C:C' ,,.,,,,c~· 2c_!:,_] ;,£01'. O[SC.'f!PTION _ OF D;I<; PNC PAR('!-{ S (FJR_<;) A"'[O,CAN ~-,[ r,.s~·~•NC[ W>.l",h'' ,_.,,., ... ,,..(.S' .,a ,'IC· iJ82~' ...... _ JA'l~ ',i;RJ:A~' )ii <'-•','!,' o,or;(, \ a t >11.) E ~;;[ '10' • "'•• :.>-'"'0 i;'CJ,,;~ 5'ff l'~t,N (Of•. C,1' Oi" il[.'/T,::"a %CilT ?CM NU,,,9[~ ::>9J-89. ~EC()fl!.>I..J ~0'lt"B€R "· 1989 L'~OER <INC CO~'N'Y R[GORO,-~:; NO 89';1''1006 OF OffrC/A(. R!COROS [;(C[PC r•«r f>OPTlDN CC!Nvt">'[O r.) r~[ ~,ry Of" R[~".)ol 6Y '-",H ~(A,'J.f Cf£(; f>[COf?O(O ,·0·10,nR 9, ,;as "·~o,~ R[CO,O~i/,'G .,o ~911090-'J :;. 0/i'l',A, H[COROS. '" «NG cou~·y WA',>'JNCTON A~SO [>'C[,->C,N:; ',-[£i?[>'.>Q!,4 ,.,,, f>,'.)il,iO,, cc.,,uD :o ''-'i ('PY l" ,,,,,,Q,'J ~t OiT~ RfCOROEO •,•cusr "· 2'.>J6 ~~i,'f,< il[CCRO•NC '10 20C60B'70C{:•II~ :~ K.'N~ CQLWTY, ~ASH•NGTG~ cocs' l, J .• ,.~o I, B,Oa J. R£,'TON ,A>'M ·~HlA~C. ,c.;tc>POWC ·~ T><[ ,.,,,. '><[Rto, RiCORl)(D ·~ e';ll~<<f 1} c,-~L~r, P•C[ F, IN K''G (;ot,.~'Y. WAS><'~G';Jr-t. ,~ccpr T>-i[R[CR!)u '"! ~O'l"I 30{)() .'HT '.JI SAro LC', O:,,.";[([I) ro "'' c:rr Of" !?i_NTC,,, FQ!? SfR[[1 <u!?i-O'>fS, ,JN[,[R Rff'.JRO,~O ,VO :;rw~~I ()' 0'"''" RffORVi AiSO l"XC(H ;hA' ''Oli"OO C0,.';[([0 ro 'HI Cr1Y o, •t.Nl()N ~· fhAC fNSCR,jl.l[hl R(CO'icn; Off[W8f~ ,2. ;_(JO(; UNI)[~ P'CC!SlOi~C I-IQ 2'.!06'2'20C·OJ~ii. ·~ ,,,.,., COUhTY, >t<SH1~c·,m 'OCf,O'fR "''" TH[ ~(,'lti, .. ~,, ~r .. c,'!:O ~0'11~ ,r;-; s••ccr 41!.!0INING '"" ,-,-,Ar M'1ro,, r.< AL,U SJ.,()j/,/J.VC c'< 11,r ~~T ~5 ·,~c•:c, .mot~'-"·'' 0' RCN''.}N QRQ:NAN~f ~0 JJP9 MO R.'CQRQfC MA' 2:. l,J;l t,~l)tR i<'NG CC~'N'< "lC)iiV•NC ,•J ?900210/;42 "' orrwr« Rf(()IJ'.J5, .'N ~.~c CGJ'-'C' WA5~•,'Gr'JN ;;..r:_.,OR'" lOC X .,~,, or_-·~·! ,~;, ,;;,•oc '1./' u, "'' ,·uRrn...-5' ~·1,R'fR 01' "'I tA.~i!._; './~~~ ·i,;r;/; .. r<;..:~~ ..8G ,;~'."'5,,,,. ZJ :,Oii r~. "ANCi" : [,\S' l<"l~A«f"C;r CX<:fM l"'!CRFPW~ )"f f!C~''' 60.00 Fi[ r ·~,,"v'. ccw.--,:r,·~ 'C f',f ""'" 0' ~,,, rr;~ FOR ,1f/[r' P,/ll"OSn s'>,J(P O[C~i>O·~G ~,jU/i[O )'~c..·aoe ~ ()CP~!Al RfC:');ms A, ,.1 t•Y,'.P' ;J<f;>f.';>C"' TC,A' PQC. ryy. -~i0£:,F L ~-~ >I'.~,,· ,.,, ~s' ·~ IX /Ee r QC "M•C Poi>n:><, .y ~"O vo;i,,, Joe oo ,u · ... v;; ,o,:i«,-~~ • oc ,~,-,,,., r,e ~u~~, ,..,,•~s_1,1<S>'J~ u,r w,d,·-Of"-~·,~ ,.,,,c~ ... , 1J,,,,,c re, rsr c·" ~· RfN7tl, ~, .?ffC N<;t.~oro u~.;r, RE,DPD1NC NO CJZ52.l5 o• <)Pl(;«[ R((,Oi/01 A,;,,.-urrtr rnrRr.rno.., ..,,., PO~no;, ,,..,ch ~·, oi:rnrn '0 •,;f r, r, if Rr~ m~ a 0 ~,,.o ~rcQooro .uw , :;9;,. ~NU£•. ;ir~:,;;u·~~ .w.J. 1<0o~1os1, or omrr.t Rrc~~Ds A. le) 0 x.::ar 1M,'. POROC~'CO~';[Y!O,!O l•i[ ''"Y ':.'I R[c·rc~ jY T'<AC NS"'~"CN' ;,rw11crD NC/'MRffl ''· }Xlf; "'"°~!< R[~QRD,.~C NV'.~CC61,','C}(WE8 ·"}''~)'.; UNNrt_ ns--,,NCfON • •N9 i or .or,,,, •<1#~;,,(,a ,·o :J~-~a. ~,.c,:,ii'or~ NQ~1<2n 111. l!MB ii[C;;(R~,~-,·o ,d,, -~~~:,, Jr 11,·nr,A, WC-O•Vi .. f<' ,(/NC ~LN "'· '1,A5H"'G re~ ~<SCfC A··O :·:c: '. y._'J,;, '· .,,.mN CARV •CPCACt A,CC,,0::>t, AGl:C~V"G "io .,.,, "'" "'[,i(U, . ~tCCl"O/;'J ,N •.oww •2 ")F ?~AI,\ P,cr ll. 'N ~,~~ cc~1-1,t, w,,,,,Nc:rON '~'~, n_tf~ l{''S C'i[ SG~fh' H•~· .o• .,.cHm .-m .. , 77.Y ~1/([[1 A()JOPNII:~. A> VACATfO ~N~(3-0CV Qr Pf:~''.JH·OPO•~~~CE ~o JJl;, . AL~() 1oc,,~;;r, """' \),,,, POfi/'ON or .,,r~ A:)J()"',r,,G Q,{ ,,,[ "'"'· v•CA'(D J.\'JUr ;,;v ';< ~,,,,--o,, ORCIN·~~, ~o •0<,1;, N;f/ Rr.:q,•orn ~•l!C'• ;, ·~~.' u~ofe R[CORJ•m: .vi; ~'C'J'l15'/I a,-'.Jff,O,.c ~ffC~G5 . ?APC/, • 0 d', ~.:x:, , Ofr,·<l~",-.~ •:Ar~cc .,;,;;.,~~-•cco""''~ ro "'' Pc'' Cr<fR[f)f" S;"CGflil~D ,N ,~coll[ •7 ~F·f>.A"i p,:;[ J.', ,,, t:ING CO<.'~". WA>'•"'GTOt.' rtJC("Tl-'[R "'"' T'<!\T ~oon)N,-or All(' .~.IO'N/NCJ:i~ '"I <it'i'. ,·Ac'1D UNO[ .• cr•y ~· OENCC~ O~J/.'JA~C:[ Nil .o<lr, /\"."0 RfCVl'O[~ WRC" ,r ·~BJ ,·Mi[P R[::OP?"'G rn £'OJ1'J5'a ~· arnc,~" P~CORO~ p,~::r, J ~:, "''' 'p'"-'' "· acc•.,r. •ur1~'!'<{ .,·,IJ'~G A iNiO;~G ;·:, ~,.~. Rf,'~SOD _.,-:;;.,ore lJ nr,, ,_;·,~·o oa,;c;,r,1,,r. M.' ;,c~<•?;J0')0~56 :•. •1cJL~"' n~. P,,;cs 5J r~oor,:,M &, Gi ~,ATS. c,(:~P• ri,H ~Qi/no,., co,•,,:,ro re n-,r ~,n-0r ;,rqo~ D· "'"' :Nsrnr.,•.o•,·· ~,co;,n,:o oc:t"'<ll" "· noo U~O[R RC~OP!J,~C ""' ;{){)f;')'1J10ll~ ,~ "·"''· ~'N~"-~,,, ... ~,. '1N VICINITY MAP DOEING REA!. rY C0Mi-'ANY J2614 I O•" OF -----,-.--·------;c G> ~"p; BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 HO"<itY!iI.dl _,Jf,JJ,JL ~;~$}; J.,t~·;,;'.,":f{' j; '~/':?Z 0 ta'v~.~:rn,, "/IN.'•4'•Jf~ C'N•'', ·•,\ fff' .' .. .•' ..,,,._,,_,«l>,'~5 ShO"l>I ,,.-~l '1,lci.C .'N c/11 WQ<" DP«sQy M,<::O.'Of<a//Jl [O·"'if'"U"" ·srMG'.~ :,w r,;;s, ANJ Li,c• :c>i"f ~,,,,011, .... ~ 9ff1, :c·"'"'·?•:~ rv •.NO •1,:c•srrn ~:;•''-">, ,: sr;R·r, C~cll;/:'Acro ri~bH'N( ,.,,,,,.,. Tl,[_.,,, _Y[,e; >,J<,1;:J <" X ,. Cl)t,C'lf'( .,c,,·~"/'°'f ~/ WP~(•' 74;.~ ·~ ,JQa,<CN C~Sf o~·,... 1 c· ~t'.1~ ,,~,,A. , '/' '.!Ci~·,o,· SOQNC'! BINDING SITE Pl.AH 5f:;!4SECT7,TWi-')l'< RGESE.'iV'M SW 7 J SECT 8. f'Nf.' 1J I,', RGE 5F. WM CITY OF' RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINCJTON ,0' ·~ A;r,JMN C:J,l-Oo 05'-'C, -~J: na6MOB>Uor.>C, 1, BJ8•: • IB~ r "J"9d<6 jff(i5 ,_ >· l~CMN c~: Aff<...:_) '; --_J ~:;r~~r.~;~;~}2 Ri..!-...f.B..[lCTS ~"', CJfY 0• .. ,,,,,,,,,. ;~o,ir P_~r ,__, 8Gl•~·~ ,JA;;(£, .18 >f': l.'C, ;'-'"lllC,S9%C~• ~ N -(S- """;n!(,.!C- R•5j50bl! l• ,~. ,.. ' ! '""•Y2n,:r ,_., }0" -,·a~·J:·u··~ •o O< LOT 5A ><,' I! acs ·:; :,..,. o,-,,~·,v, s~~vr, CON'~o, ,rr••~Q" J,</)1,iJVrNTS ~, ;><~'""' CJ'/ 5,c.-rs 2 •N~ J ' I .. f 2 ... ; ,., ::\_ <:: 1 : 1 I . ' ' I ' ' I~ ; I ' ., >'; " I 1,, "' '•ii ,111111111111111 20080111000854 ;B;mJrtt\~·· 1 ~" U.C CO\,W'T,, ""' BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BIHOIHO SITE PLAN SE 1'4 SECT !. TYIP. 2:3/\/ RGE. 5E.. WM 5'1111/4 S£CI" t!. TWP. 23 /'; RGI:: 5/;:, Vlt M CITY OF RENTON, KfNC1 COUNTY, WASHINGTON I I 5.5<l19':5,"f. 1• 6ll ,2 so1,;.,,·rn·w: ,, 2P ,.J I6ll-:s.J'.5<l"(. J 50' IL__ __ [ __ I Ir LOT 78 n~.C?Y-.s_r 5 'i' oe I <11(.' l~t>,j,(t,,' ;.,· ,,,, ,.,c~o,.·c-•.> ; is .~ ~ I~ __ , , I I, .0c.~To.~ ,,;.<>.M A(;"U"'- ·10, 12/J7 blOC.~ 4 1,-C R/r_ Jc' ion,, '~-< ~' ·~,o~..,, I PUiiQN f"Ai?\< ACR£;1G[ ·. VUc ·1;!/5! KO~K 2 , > ' ~i I 3 -w· ~ ;; s -JO -o ,-< ,. ca,.ic "c,,,u..,£.1Jr .·~· c•sr ~/ COPP[!' Dj,S' , " 5"'<1' r,,rrfl5fCrlO,,., )' ;,;~;;:}:~o B.f.QQBQ_.[AS£.M.DYJ_S__AN.D_ /IC.q(Qt{!jl.£._ ''"'' ... c~.G .. ~ .. ~_, wsi.:'a~.NC[ W~P·~•'COw~1n.,~·, .WS-,?)8201 ,~97B'n"< lO~~<Yf,;, CO,,-,i CNCR $C-:;,:/- 6JJ ,e (r., CARD[~ ro ,~ rR S.:CI) _fi'ff'l<fNCES "f.0 x;;,N'{ : .. ~~[;:" Jr()ef p;,r ~'-Qjf fl[C .~·) n0'12059Cc>JO• 1 .:~u:wo Of suHI"'!:, ,~oBJl900.J. 5.~">fC,,,'"Jt,/ ~fN',.'S" A5S0CIA'TS r P,,., 0,-~r,·ro~ >AR" <(:!?[AU 1,-\)c. I,! I), "Vf>. P~ J/ < ,or CW[ •o.,.:s·,ir~· C'.A-~CB-8~ R!f. VC ~B'llH(l()I -=-#, c•·y Of l'["IJTON CO, 'l'Ot 1,/(/1','U"l~" 18" •" > ,. C'(.•·iC "IOI.' ~·/ ~Of'"fl,' PjlJ l!.)C'~!.) C<,0"'·:; ":JNCUtS'T .'~ {.',OC, ~CC[Df!:~ AS C(~l[H V llf.'1'0" d I! , .v ldJd:...1-0,,,) <. '..IIJJ49Q "''':' •s ,,,o~N ON "l' ('") ,. ,.,-•' ' ""'"'" 5 ,~· SPO./ ,a,:c ,,,, ... ,.vr. Rc"t"·I<(.' J}.>!,(j(". "0' PL~'C'rn 1,,·s~·,m.::c1,1: >;•c,,,,,, ... ,,c~ /IJ J(SCR'P'r(;V SPc'~ , .. ,,,-~ ~,') LO~'Gt:P u,s,,,' o & ,~ ~ .. ,,,y & :,,,,,.,,.,~ !'S1.M£,>'5". ~[C ~'Cs H..12120 & j032,2,c " "'''l" f''i£wtN" ~ff ~o ..1•J2•n , ; ~WfRA. 0[5(RY4 r,o,,· R ( PACJ(,C rnAST .,.·.,,.,oQAO COl,IPANY. R(l ,'IQ_ :165h""-' (c 8' (()/ 5A) J SA"lf•R• Si"Wc"P (ASf"i)H, /?ff NQ }<~H: _-·• ," _. ," '~ ;t;g:;./~::1"f .. ~~t"JE~( N°f S:,~,:;""0 1 J '/'?'-i:v,;,-.c,~I< r w•o'!"'• no1, ,~. VV.c'""''~ 10 v~:'"""'"t y.,,:;• """i "6 RQo,£/i l•5E~[~'f R[C VO 6},0,t.}I, "6 & "' GA5 (AS(<!['l'S, P[C ~OS ,,,,,~v,u .t ,,,,o,o~~ 20 ~CW[R [•5£ut><1. <'£C ~G 7?08r70lJJ. 'IQ/ P(LJ''W (;r.t.;,~·~ C"INl[Hf.~ 0'1 AS'.•coc~:P ;,,,,,;,,,-,NW 6J 0' iv· 00.' 2, ·u· r .. ,., '"""'"'· RC ~o no90105;e ·· · n" ;,, 1,·•·,.,, .-,,,.,E.-'>. "fC ,,o, 'nOvJ,O~o· &, n'neoaoo . ""' . ;, ,o· HO .JC' ~·n,,,. ,,.,,.,,.,rs. REC .w :;oa:J(!(,lG (,IA(A!IQN a,,:, J!2'. ,a ~<,"(a ,.x,.,,~,. Hf(. NO S•J>2<-0l6a, ~o, l'lO"fU (•o S:7<11' CC'lr/Y[J Qi, A5-,X•'fD ••1:>,,"[5 G'· S •J Cf ~ ,5c· G' ,, ':,0' o,-L(" -·•; 2'. PO~tR t•SEM[NF I>[~ ~[) B<I0200592 Jr ~(/o,£0 ['5(\i!N'. RtC VO B-!i12!6090 ~~ ~~t\~ ~~~~~i. ;~z %~ :',~ii~~~I ~g;,~~gr:,c ;i'f{N.~R[~9gil~:rl.~{,e-;:. rm .':-'-Ci! •nF>; J• ACCESS •/JD PARK.'NG US[J,1£/,/;<;, /?ff. NOS B8C·2]<DB0S ,., aBOJU081? JS PO"'fR r•SEMrnr, l>[C. ~G B8QffJ0051P .JII sror~•tK "unur-CAS{>IEI''. R[C !W. BlllDJl[)N.,. NO'III FAU~ ,.v PaOy AV( V q/,'/ J~ U~Ur, fAS[ .. £.~,. f/[C NO B>1J819o-<li0 <0 ROAO"U S(()"(" S,!Jf~,r~ [AS[ .. £/JT, R[G. NO 690Bl9fl<8' ••. .,~,._.;-[ASE .. [Nr, O[C. ~o eg•r<>90•15 "4} RC5rli•Cf,O,,$. C[)N)),1)0N5. D[D,c,nO«s, NO'l'.S. EASE«[~'"' AND OR[)Vf:',.'G"''i O', C,l't 0, •c~·rvN s,,QR-"'-'-' NO 09J-8<;, R[~ 110 8'i11'<0QO~ •J '[01,/S A'4j ,0P0,,5,0NS CO,,WNW "' FJRE YA/N "'fFl?-n[ AGRffJ,f[N7 8f,.W[(1, ,~, 1/V.,.'1/G (J)M~M"Y A',{. r~t c,·v 0, ~l~'~N. REC N~ 9105,JH~d (cl(~ T:J .~()R"' OF '"'fASfCTJQI, (/ ll'H ·~o ~AHK) (~UH '0' A"!C.' ScJll,IC' 0 ~:.,.'IR'Y.' (~l RcC'"10lD ~1/0l~ PH 110, ~·o~U60~~/l) U ?CW[R ("•5[1,/;'N'. Rf;•; NO 91G"J0"1>' <o ~C>l-["R [ASE'l{N"i. HtC NO$ S<F'220~2J sic 94'1.iJOI'°" ., -~C:-<411•N rs. ~-QNo,n:Jl,I>. HIS rH,,·,,r.ws .,,LJ/C!f;, 05[1,/fl'/ ,, /~ OOC-"'ENT RECORO[D worn Rff. ~·c 91GJPll••u. ll[•NG A R[ -R[COND•~G Of'-~fr; ;.,o 90P11Wll~~ ..... • d l'Ovt,V•N•S. 00ND11f~S. J1Ja:Sf1'1CC10>J> A/JO/or;, fASEMCNIS '" 50'.Jr/!PMT & NON-O?Posmo,,· AGRfEl,/[1/', R[C NO 1:lC<l!fl'OOC5!5 •9. ww~·~. COl<LJ•n.::ws. Nf~"'/C1J0'4S ANO/OR E"SfM[N'S, R[C. NG. 2000111/00IJ,. (FRI'S PROP<:Rrv; (DOES NOr ••rec, 5UB.CG1 PRQP[R'Y) : ~~ " ,, ilt:V!:LC)f'>,I.NT "AGRt[ .. i;/Jrs BU\0\'Tli l>if llot:•NG Go.lPAI/Y A'40 '"[ c,rr OF R[l/'0/1, REC. M}S 2001Dllv'200022< ,ic 20CJ1]1GOC16JI ~J. riR"'~-l'o\of}IAN13, CO'IOH/0~5 AI/D f!fS'111CHO>,'S c()l,/1.i.l,/[!} IN l!OfWG t•nS><OOf iAIIDING /jrNDfNS s,JT PlAN IUA-Cl<l-01!1-/lSP RC, NO 2W<!UJ000~l0 ." . ,. :V l"C\'£1."AN,S_ COIJO'IT0'4S, f/fS"'JCT101l"S '4;./D/OR [,l5f"M[N'5, R[C. N'O ?OC~ruaoo,e1, 5• '[""'5 •NJ P~Q','ISIONS &:,'4TAIN£OiN ·snu~orn ASflrr .. rn,. DrTO.fTN THE /JWNC cDM••Nr ,lN,7 )H[ r.,r; OF .S[NrON, RrC I-ID .{iJ~•2W01~J2 (~01-/G,'CR["S P"{)f'[P':') (!)OfS.'+<O' A,ffC' ,;,.,ofcr Pfl()P[/>T~) ' N I -@ JC·C 0 ~----SCALE 5C ;-C:-C' ) '" ~ rJC /"f NQ P~iJPC~·v C~,/N[~; .,,: ~,.~1~,;,c, •s ,,,~· ~-,~·~~·"~'NG:;"'-•'!.•N ~U[ fU FU •vwf. ,:o,.sceu:·po,. C~l{S,'U!_W~ r,()N<; '1>ACC "fl"~-, ar ~f'•'~lC o,:,~·,r RX'N·~·co.irAsr BINDING 51 ,;f Pi AN AR[ A 5 :;or. -'~i/' rRAC~:&., '0' 21;'·· I _ _:__,.: f- 15.68(< I "" !...J.}A-07-048-BSP Uo/D-35-0016 80[,NG HL"AL TY C.:UMPANI' CITY OF RH/TON LAKESHORE LANO/NG 2 BINDING SITE PlAN J2614 J2614-SURV-u~·or DWG ("'""low--, ... ~--·------~--