Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 2Page I of I From: Sent: C'><EMr, 7o Oh.) 5 __ / ~~-eJ.~c ...,_- Bob Thompson [bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] r I l°F?.::r Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:58 PM ..__ c __,J VanPatten, Steve --···-··----- To: VanPatten, Steve Cc: Floren!, Ray Subject: FW: Rathanam Short Plat Attachments: 20071025092533379.pdf; 20071025083121331.pdf Steve and Ray, Do to the length of time it is taking to record this plat I would like to make a change and have the traffic fees paid at building permit. Can we still do this? If this is possible we should probably make lot 9 exempt due to the demolished structure and the fact that I have already picked up a building permit for lot 1. Please let me know if this works. I have attached a copy of a water bill for the demolished structure and a copy of the building permit fees paid for lot 1. Thank you, Bob --···-----·-····-----· From: Bob Thompson Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:28 AM To: Steve VanPatten Subject: Rathanam Short Plat Good morning Steve, A while back I asked you about the existing structure on Rathanam that we demolished and how that affects the fees. You indicated that if I could give you ·a copy of a utility bill maybe one lot would not be subject to the Traffic mitigation fees. I have located a water bill for the original house and have attached a copy. Also I am attaching the payments for the building permit that has already been pulled to show what fees have been paid and should be deducted from the fees yet to pay. Thank you for your help with this. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Charter Homes, Inc. 11/09/2007 VanPatten, Steve ----------------------· From: Sent: To: Cc: Bob Thompson [bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:58 PM VanPatten, Steve Floren!, Ray Subject: FW: Rathanam Short Plat Attachments: 20071025092533379.pdf; 20071025083121331.pdf Steve and Ray, Page I of I Do to the length of time it is taking to record this plat I would like to make a change and have the traffic fees paid at building permit. Can we still do this? If this is possible we should probably make lot 9 exempt due to the demolished structure and the fact that I have already picked up a building permit for lot 1. Please let me know if this works. I have attached a copy of a water bill for the demolished structure and a copy of the building permit fees paid for lot 1. Thank you, Bob From: Bob Thompson Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:28 AM To: Steve VanPatten Subject: Rathanam Short Plat Good morning Steve, A while back I asked you about the existing structure on Rathanam that we demolished and how that affects the fees. You indicated that if I could give you a copy of a utility bill maybe one lot would not be subject to the Traffic mitigation fees. I have located a water bill for the original house and have attached a copy. Also I am attaching the payments for the building permit that has already been pulled to show what fees have been paid and should be deducted from the fees yet to pay. Thank you for your help with this. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Charter Homes, Inc. 11/09/2007 10/04/2007 12:30 2538725285 VV',,, ® King County Department of Development and Envlronrnental Servj~ei; 900 0Alccsd11lc A vc SW Renton, Wui;hfngton Q8055-1219 O<tober 4, 2007 CHARTER HCJ,IES PAGE 04 Page l of 1 Summary of Charges and Payments •••"•• -··••• ••. • ••'•• ·--··•••·-•so'"'·-·· ..... ,,. ",-•,•,. .. -00 H • 0 •• •,•,,, 0 MO ...... ,. '•• ~ ....... ,.,, ...... ~,., •• OOH .... ,,. OH oO 00 ""''""'"""""""""'' ••• •••• Applicant: CHARTER HOMES lNC 60 I UNION ST STE 5100 SEATTLE WA 98101 205·94 7-2205 ! Aelivlly Number: 'Project Number: B07L0955 I Develop men I Num bcr: ( Permit Type: BASIC I Status: APPROVBO ' ·--.. ., ..... ~ ---.. ~-........ _ •... ..,..,, ____ .,.,.,, .......... __ ,..' -··-····-····· ·-···-·· ·-. C'l"h1f1;e·s~';~1'"',r:c'l'.~~,:-~r,·;:t·=F7.r·,·""'""'~ -,-.. ..,. ....... ---: -, .,... , , ·· -·· -, .... .,. "' ,-· · i .,-~ ~ ' _<. • • , ' 1 'l ' , oa I F ,is I o '> , ' Description Bldg FlrcFlow Review Bldg Inspection Counter Service Fees Erosion Control lnsp Issuance Counter Pee Roads MPS Adm in -DDES Roads MPS Admln • Ronds Road, MPS Zone 342 Site Engr Rev/No Hrly S1nrc Building Code HOURLY FEE: Addressing Services HOURI. Y FEE: Bulldlng Plan Check SUI! TOTAL CHARGES: Dcscrlpt.lon Suspense Account Cheer,# 9143 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid 109827 Payee CHARTER HOMES INC Date Entered 7/2012007 Amount· $181.IJ $1,275.34 $102.64 $35.00 $102.64 v $26.00 $34.00 $3,765.00 $724.50 $4,50 $42.00 $70.00 $6,362. 7S Amount ($682.24) ($6B2,24) $5,680.51 The fees Bhown above ropresent curronl charges sa of this date and are an esllmate based on tho lnfonnatlon provided to DDES at the time of applioatlon, ·For services .that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of thoee services will be based on the aotual houn, ·worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect al the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with -any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior lo permit Issuance will be colleotlld al that !Ima. Fee& subsequently posted will be · :bllled to the applicant All fees must ba paid ln full before DDES losues Final Approval, T.C.0. or c.o ................... _ .... . 10/04/2007 12:30 2538725285 CHARTER HOMES ® King County Dcpnrtmont of Dnetopment nnd F.nvironmcntRI Sorvlce.s 900 011kcsd.thi Av~ SW Renton. Wi,1;hineton 980SS·1219 Thursday, October 04, 2007 . Activity Num bor: 807L0965 Projoct Number: B07L096S FEE RECEIPT J""'"'" ! Applic1nt: CHARTER HOMBS INC 601 UNION ST STR 5100 8EATTLE WA 98101 206-947-2205 PAGE 03 C"AR"(:;E,~...-.,.,,..-e'I!' ,~i-.~~~~~nF;• '~ ~,--.,,_,,,~c~ c ~1~•~ ~"= '.ft '<"' ' • ' "< , , -r.,~ \*.,.II . ' 1 ' Oes,rlptio11 c:o·~iilQi' Scl"VlcOlCCS ... sit~\~w Rc~rn·~-q;,y Erosion Control ln~p Slate llulldi'ng Co.de l!l.~titmcc Counter P'cc TRS Hourly Fe!!: R\lildlng Pion Chock Rnnd::i MPS Admin .. DOES Rldg lnspcclion R.C'l~ds MPS At1min .. !load~ Roods MPS Zone 342 Hldg PlrcF\ow Re~.i~~ ms I lnurly Fe~: A~drc.11lng Se;.,i;~. SUB TOTAi,: n11scrlptfon Ch"k Suspense Account SUll TOTAi,: CHANGF. GIVEN: IIA LANCE DUE: "I .'"\'I' II"'• ChccklnK Check# 9,698 109827 9143 ''", .,..,,., .• -· •.. ,,.,~1,:,-.:r,,:1•-,r• .. ,r,:n..-.-.. ,. lf'"" ... -., •• - Payoo CHARTER l·IQl\,IE,S INC CH/\RTP.R HOMES INC l):1le Entered •• 1,,,..:,•,·,,· ., •• • ... , ••• '"1" Amount $102.64 $724..50 ··ris.oo ,.JI•,••••' .. , .j ..... Dote Entered 101041:2007 O?n0/2007 $4.50 $10{64 $70.00 . $26.00 $1.275.)4 $)4.00 .. ~:r.'fosooS) $1R1.13 $42.00 S6,362.7S Amonnt (Sl.610.Si) .. '·. ($682.24) ($6,292.75) SO.OD C::) The fees shown abov, rapresant OUl'rent chargH as of thia data and are an estimate baaad on the lnformat!on providod to DOSS 111t ttie tlmo of a,::ipli,;atlon. DOES permit fHs w~ra restructurud effective M11rc:h 4th, 19;9_ Many foH prevlously ess.eHed a flat fee, now are ae,e,sod a1 hourly Qhargo1. B11eause of this chana~. and to ansura that our oustomera eecure pennlts as quic~ly &1 posalble, pennits may be issued prlol' to all hourly charges being.recorded Into our blllrng system. For 1cuvlces that arv rendered on 1n hourly basis, th& cost of thoH servlc&e wUI bo based on the aatu.:al hours worked. Hourly feOG are oh11rged 111t t!,e rata In affeat at the time or service-, and will be billed monthly, along wlth any other outsrancflng fees. Fees that have been postod prior to permit Issuance will bo collected at ttiat time. Pees· · subsequently postod wm ba bill&d to tho applleant All feos must be paid in full before DOt8 lssue11 Final Approval, T.C.0. or c.o. Printed on: Thu11:dny, October 04, 2007 nt I o:,6:36 AM Pogo I of I /*~~i\ I ffA{;j--w, \,~~" .... ,. ~ ,~~ /;;- -~i-' -,,$ ""~~ The due date on this bill does not extend the due date of any previous balance BILLING QUESTIONS: (253) 630-9900 • EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS: (253) 630-9900 • SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION• Customer Name: CHARTER HOMES ,. Service Address: 11634 SE 192ND ST LAST ACCOUNT NO. SERVICE PERIOD DAYS/ AVG AMT BILLING DATE DUE DATE PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE 9921-011900 01/18/07 -03/07/07 48 / 0, 13 03/31 /07 04/20/07 00000000 $38,00 @l3[;)U:,DGJD'u'D©IIJ 01:? Usage Summary Information Service Period Meter Reading Consumption (ccQ From: 01/18/07 Starting: o To: 03/07/07 Ending: Previous Balance Payments: {_; 1-1 ( 1S2. l CSl Current Billing Summary WATER $32.00 0.00 6.00 Total Current Charges: $6.00 Total Due: _$,38.00 Approximate state taxes included in current charges: $0,29 Days in Cycle: 48 -Cost per Day: $0.13 }'~' . ') . ',' ;· -' ~ It....\ ~ ~. '~· ' ,.. \;;_ -tj :· I } . ,V ,r ,,, ·- { ___ , '::J'() ,, (3 (!) ill ill @ II] u' <3c:JDill@@Q "' ,..~ ,-Wate~-;:,sa~e by Billing Period -Meter #631 939 86 ! 1 ;·------,---------,--,_,_, __ ,__, ___ _ i I ' -I a, ! I}) '·-l u I,_ I . .D :::; iu i ·-r o i (I) I • IQ I LJ 1- L Q I Q (.() r, ~ c., f(.'i C .~"'.,.,., 0 0 0 0 [I 0 ;.,:, tD tD w t-~ t-·-,-, "" Q Q p --. Q. '=~ lD t---m --(() 0 0 0 -0 0 1OOcf=748 gallons (';'"'' -~""·· _J ' ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33915 1 st Way South, #200 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 838-6113 Fax: (253) 838-7104 DA1E ATIN: RE: TO: KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT ~AN"""D~E~NVl'"""R~O~N~M~E~NT'-"-AL=--"S=ERV""-'IC~E~S'----~~A 900 Oakesdale Avenue s.w. Renton, WA 98055-1219 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Prints COPIES Copy of Letter Other- DATE NO. Plans Change Order DESCRIPTION LETTER OF TRANSMllTAL 8/9/2007 !JOB NO. 1277-007-007-0001 RAYFLORENT . PEER REVIEW OF SHORT PLAT DOES File No. L03P0014 (Rathinam Short Plat) Courier -----_____ Mail PRIORITY _____ To be picked up X overnight mail AM Delivery -----2()6.296-6790 CAD Disk Original drawings 1 8/9/2007 Conv of orioinal review letter 1 8/9/2007 Coov of each set of redlines 2 8/9/2007 Sets of clean orints for vour review 1 8/9/2007 Statement from Touma addressing conditions of aooroval 1 8/9/2007 Lot closure calculations 11-IESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval X For review and comment For your use For your signature As requested For recording --~~~~--------- REMARKS Please call if you have any questions or comments. PLEASE NOTE that Touma has stated that the fence along the east line no longer exists. ALSO under General Notes, please review the first three nortes and the note regarding Tract B. It has been left to you to determine if the notes are appropriate/required. COPY TO: SIGNED: Cynthia Flood, PLS. I ,., mmCONSHIJING ENGINEERS 11c · · Isl@ July 27, 2007 Job No. 1277-007-007-0001 Mr. Mounir (fom) Touma Touma Engineers & Land Surveyors 6632 S. 191 st Place, Suite E 102 Ken~ WA 98032 RE: Rathlnam Short Plat -King County Short Plat No. L04S0003 Peer review of the short plat Dear Tom: We have reviewed the Rathinam Short Plat by Touma Engineers & Land Surveyors per the prints dated April, 2007. This plat was reviewed according to the "King County Procedure for Checking of Final Plats" (http://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/le-info-finalpl.pdtl available on the King County ODES website, hereinafter referred to as "the procedure". This letter is intended to accompany those redlined prints dated 07-27-2007 and will not describe every redlined correction. Sheet 1 Redlined revisions to acknowledgments, approvals and recording certificate to conform to Appendix "A" of the procedure. Miscellaneous redlines regarding add ups, notes, easements to be added, possible fence encroachments, north arrow, etc. Closures need to be provided for the centerline and for the ,sectjon subdivision. Sheet 2 33915 Isl Way South Suite 200 Legal description is required. Notes to be added or addressed as noted. Tel !253) 838 6113 Fax (253) 838 710t. Bolhel! (4251 415 6144 www.esmcivil.com Faderal Way, WA 98003 TGll Free !BOO) 345 569t. Civil Engineering Project Management land Surveying Land Planning Public Works Landscape Architecture ·' ,, Mr. Mounir (Tom) Touma July 27, 2007 Page 2 If there are any questions regarding these review comments, please contact our office to discuss. Upon completion of the revisions, please return the enclosed redlined drawings and one set of new prints to our office for final review. Upon completion of that final review, we will request that King County set up a meeting to discuss our review. This meeting will include the county, Charter Homes, ESM and yourself. Very truly yours, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC. -M~!~ nior Survey Project Manager Enclosures cc: Mr. Bob Thompson, Charter Homes i:\esm-jobsl 12n10071007\documentlletter-001.doc i~~1U> §TATlE§ ®F ,4.~~Rt . ~~. • . ·.. ll;j,, 1(() ' , j, S'l'ATe • • 11 . «~ie j,tate of :_· i: ... 0 ) :... Wasbington ~ ~,t J8Bll , . . . . Secretary of State I, SAM REED, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue this CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION to STRATTON HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION aian WA Non-Profit Corporation. Charter documents are effective on the date indicated below. Date: 10/10/2007 UBI Number: 602-769-563 Given under my hand and the Seal of the State of Washington at Olympia, the State Capital Sam Reed, Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 VanPatten, Steve From: VanPatten, Steve Sent: Monday, .October 15, 2007 10:55 AM To: 'Bob Thompson' Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Bob Re 1) Please provide me with the permit number and a receipt showing the impact fees paid and I can adjust the amount to be collected. Re 2) No big deal -have your surveyor revise the plat note and I will have the fees revised in permits. Re 3) If you had a residence that was demolished --we may be able to give you an exemption to the impact fees. Please provide a copy of the demolition permit and documentation that the demolished structure was in fact a real residence at some point during the 3 years prior to the application for the short plat permit. Documentation can be a utility bill for example. Also the plat notes will need to be revised. From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 8:01 AM To: VanPatten, Steve Subject: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Good morning Steve, I received the fees for Rathanam on Friday afternoon. As I looked these over there are a few questions. 1) Does the Roads MPS fee take into account that I have already picked up one permit? 2) What does it do to us if I now change to paying the Roads MPS fees at building permit? 3) Do I get credit for the existing structure that we demolished? I am working on getting Tenzing all the information concerning the illumination, pond and Bond Reduction. Thank you for your help. Bob 10/15/2007 Inspection Request / Corrections ~::::fN:~~ib cl2Z'k Address: 1// ( fcr;J;'F/) "l.. S' ~ Project Name: ~/'::E:i, AA~ 574~ Development and Environmental Services ® Department of 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest KingCOunty Renton, WA 98055-1219 206-296-6630 Dale of Jnsp,::&~/ Y; d/7 Type of lnspection:./-,9-~;;r ..._,, f ,I-- Contact Name:---------------.----,-Phone#: ___ -___ -___ _ Comments: /hAA.l(,. -,i1-t1&eC: l A, G ...... r CORRECT10NS ANO ~ENTS: . . .... , ... kL-[/:k;;:) I ! f -< / '-f:/7 /) ;c;;; I I 7 7_ & F-,. .4 1 I- Inspector: _M __ ,(_-=+( Zi.-.:·=.£=-,C:Y::f-'--=h_=-:::·='----------Inspected Date~ 1lz iS2 0353 {1Q/03} -c;,,-@ bOI Union \m·ct -\11ite )100 St',Hllt"'. \V,\ lJKHH September 4, 2007 Steve Yan Patten King County DDES 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 Re: Rathanarn Short Plat L04S0003 Pllllllf': )Ol). P !.,i Ill l Ln: .1 0t).\N:.o,1:-i.' <" 11,ut{·1 1 I ln11u-sl111..rnm To the best of my knowledge, all utilities serving this shmt plat that arc within the public right of way are included within a franchise approved by the King County Council. Bob Thompson Construction Manager Charter Hornes, Inc. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT -§1:: _ 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 August 28, 2007 Charter Homes, Inc. 60 I Union St. Suite 5100 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Rathinam Short Plat Dear Developer: Our records indicate that construction of the water and sewer system in the above referenced project is substantially complete. The District will collect a cash deposit for paving and maintenance to insure completion of the water and sanitary sewer system is in compliance with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District standards. The District is currently processing the final paperwork for this plat. Please contact me at (253) 630-9900 ext 144 or via email at lramsey@sooscreek.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lynn Ramsey Development Administration www.sooscreek.com SUBJECT: RATHINAM SHORT PLAT FILE NO. Ul4S0003 11634 192•• Street SE July 6, 2007 July 30, 2007 Rl STATE OF FACT-HOW EACH CONDITION OF APPROVAL WAS OR WILL BE MET Compliance with conditions outlined in the Examiner Report dated August 26, 2004: I.A. Final plat is prepared in compliance with Title 19A of KC Code. I .B. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property will sign final plat I.C. All Utilities within tl1e rights-of-way are within approved franchise by King County and complies with the requirements. l.D. Modifications to the Short plat were revised per minor plat revision letter dated October 28, 2005, King County Activity Number L05RE025. 2. Final plat is prepared in compliance with this condition as set forth in King County Code 9.04. 2A. Drainage plans and analysis complied with 1998 King County Surface Water Design manual. 28. The current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering were noted on the plans. 2C. Note was added to the face of final plat pertaining to all building downspouts, footing drains and drains from all impervious surfaces. 3.A. TO 3.L.-The road improvements were designed and constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS). 3.M. Notes 1,2,4 and 5 were added on the face of the Short Plat. Note 3 was removed per the construction of the plat to the North of the site. 4.A. Improvements of the Sewer and Water were approved and accepted by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 5.A. TO 5.B. The applicant will comply with all applicable provision ofKKC 16.82 and KKC 16- 82.150. 6.A. TO 6.C. The configuration of Lots 3,5 and 9 have been altered and will not need to be sprinkled. a Approval from the King County Fire Protection Engineer was secured. 7.A. Updated density calculations have been completed and forwarded to DDES. 7.B.. The 3 additional lots that could be created in lot 7 is no longer applicable because of the minor plat revision letter dated October 28, 2005, King County Activity Number L05RE025. Pagel of2 7.C. Street trees area planted in accordance with the Landscaping plans prepared for this subdivision 7.D. The required detailed three retention plan was included in the approved engineering plans. 7.E.. The 4,500 sq.ft recreation tract will be consistent with the requirements as stated under KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21Al4.190 7.E.1. An overall conceptual recreation plan will be submitted for DDES review and approval 7.E.2. A detailed recreation plan was submitted to DDES in accordance with KKC 21A.16. 7.E.3. A Performance Bond will be posted prior to recording of the Short Plat 8.. A note was added to the final plat with respect to the Mitigation Payment System (MPS), noting t he option allowing the MPS fees to be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Homeowners' Association is being established for the proposed subdivision. Page 2 of2 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: 01: · '2,-3. 03: TO: Addressing Services Administrative Services Division FM: Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division RE: Short Plat No.\...C)~3 Request to Record Short Plat Final No. hW-bRO~ Attached is one set of prints for the above referenced short plat. We are almost ready to forward this short plat for recording. Does your division have any corrections? NO_V~_ YES If answer is yes, please make corrections on print. DATE: -, -2..7-0, TO: ..,S_w<-LB,.,"'->tt'-"'-<'--'i-'-"-&_,·1J ..... ,.,,_,~'-'f\~~,_· -"""=-"'----Engineering Review Section FM: 1 ~/irvi~lvvi; edef Addressing Services Administrative Services Division Attached is the above short plat print with the necessary corrections shown in red. To comply with the Washington State Senate Bill 5799, please add to the above short plat prior to recording. "The house address system for this short plat shall be as follows: Addresses shall be assis_ned for the north-south roads with the ra.!l$e of J 9 I 03 to \ '1 I 4 ~ and within the range of \ , (r, '2..8 to I I 'i' DO for the east-west roads. Individual addresses will be assigned to the principal entrance of each residence or building in accordance with King County Code 16.08." , ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 6, 2006 H. Bruce McCrory Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72"d Avenue South Kent. WA 98032 RE: Sharmila Rathinam (ODES File No. L04S0003) Recreation/Landscape Activity No. L05MI076 Dear Mr. McCrory: This is in response to your March 10, 2006 request for approval of the landscape and recreation space plan for the plat of Cavanaugh. We have reviewed your March, 2006, submittal, and with the following conditions and additions. approve it as submitted: 1. The equipment (structures, benches. picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways shall be installed from the sidewalk to the play areas. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. Street trees, significant tree retention shall be reviewed with the engineering plans and are not part of this approval. A revised recreation/landscape plan may be required, in the event modifications are made to the significant retention plan. Note that trees within recreation tracts are associated with the significant tree plan and are not inciuded in the recreation/landscape bond. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the bond (two tracts) has been established at $14,379.30. This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, etc. The bond amount includes a thirty:percent contingency. fencing, picnic table and bench. Note that this approval does not include street trees or significant trees. This will be reviewed in conjunction with the engineering plans. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of an installation inspection and a maintenance inspection. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. MAIN FILE COPY r ® . King Countyr Development and Environmental Services 900 Oa~.esdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM . 206-296-6600 TTY 206-2:96-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600 . I PROJECT NAME: Rathinam Short Plat -Significant Trees and Street Trees, Form I of2 DOES PROJECT NO: L04SR077 ADDRESS: 11634 192nd Street, Renton, Washington PREPARED BY: H. BRUCE MCCRORY, RLA NO. 5 PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16. 180). A landscape maintenance Inspection deposit ls required prior to permit Issuance to cover the costs of the 2· yeilr mallltenance inspection. Landscape Inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the lnltlal deposit is exhausted. If the pt0j8Ct has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. I I UNIT PRICE I UNIT TYPE I QUANTITY I PRICE -'I SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. Ff.) $0.0( HYDROSEEDING (FRONTAGE R.O.W.) $50.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. Ff.) 7 $350.0( SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0( B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0( C. PEAT MOSS (2 INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) $0.0( D. · COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING) $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) $0.0( E. . FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0( !PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75-2" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST& LABOR 17 $4,250.0 PERIMETER AND PARKING AREAS 1.50-1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST& LABOR $0.() INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED LANDSCAPING B. EVERGREEN TREES (SIGNIFICANT TREE REPLACEMENT) FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST& LABOR 36 $5,400.01 C. SHRUBS (POND) $35.00 EACH COST& LABOR 25 $875.() -D. GROUNDCOVER $4·.oo EACH COST&LABOR $0.0 IMJSCELLANEOUS ITREESTAKES $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR 70 $186.01 ~neck out me uut:::. web site at www.metrokc.govtrtrtes Page 1 of 2 12-17-2003 11614.008.xls (_/_) • I . I I I ' . l I UNIT PRICE UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE FENCING (FENCE AT POND JS PART OF CIVIL SITE BOND) . . SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT $0.01 (INCLUDES LABOR) BERMING $17.50 LINEAR FOOT $0.0C (INCLUDES LABOR) ! IRRIGATION $0.80 SQUARE FOOT $0.01 ; RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36-INCH BALL $260.00 EACH $0.0( 60-INCH BALL $920.00 EACH $0.0 RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12-INCH BALL $26.00 EACH $0.()( 24-INCH BALL $33.00 EACH $0.IJI ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ONSITE RECREATION FACILITIES See park quantity calculations, Form 2 of2 $0.0( $0.0C $0.01 $0.0 $0.0( $0.0C $0.()( $0.0C SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUN1 $11,061.0( · Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in Accordance with Financial Guarant~ Ordinance 120220, Section 13. $3,318.31 TOTAL BOND PRICE $14,379.31 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 12·17·2003 Page 2 of 2 11614.008.xls [_/_) I @·· King County1 Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-$600 TTY 206-296-7217 LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. PROJECT NAME: Rathinam Short Plat -Park Only, Form 2 of 2 ODES PROJECT NO: L04SR077 ADDRESS: 11634 192nd Street, Renton, Washington BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. PREPARED BY: H. BRUCE MCCRORY, RLA NO. 50~ / PHONE: ~(4_2~5)~2_5_1-_62_2_2 ____ _ Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or, maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period Is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum} and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21 A.16.180). A landscape maintenance Inspection deposit Is required prior to permit Issuance to cover the costs of the 2- year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the Project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. I I UNIT PRICE I UNIT TYPE ,OD LAWN AREAS $5 00. 00 MSF (1,000 SQ. Ff.) HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. Ff.) SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 8. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) C. PEAT MOSS (2 INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING) $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75-2" CALIPER (minimum height JO') $250.00 EACH COST&LABOR PERIMETER AND PARKING AREAS 1.50-1.75" CALIPER $225.00 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED LANDSCAPING EACH COST&LABOR B. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST& LABOR C. SHRUBS $35.00 EACH COST&LABOR D GROUNDCOVER $4.00 EACH COST&LABOR ~ISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR fENCING Check out the DOES Web stte at www.metrokc.gov/ddes LandscapeBondQuantity b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 I QUANTITY I PRICE 4.2 $2,100.0< $0.0< 3 $75.0< $0.0< $0.0< $0.0< $0.()( $0.0< $0.0< $0.0< 21 $735.0< 250 $1,000.0< $0.0< Page f of 2 11614.009.xls [__/_] I I . ~ I I l ....... I UNIT PRICE .UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE $OLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT 310 $8,835.()( (INCLUDES LABOR) BERMING $17.50 LINEAR FOOT $0.()( (INCLUDES LABOR) RR!GAT!ON $0.80 SQUARE FOOT $0.()( RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36-!NCH BALL $260.00 EACH $0.()( _60-INCH BALL $920.00 EACH $0.()( RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12-INCH BALL $26.00 EACH $0.()( 24.!NCH BALL $33.00 EACH $0.()( ADDITIONAL ITEMS, )NSITE RECREATION FACILITIES Concrete paving $2.50 SF 212 $530.()( Concrete curb (play) $2.50 LF 100 $250.()( Play surface $I.SO SF 540 $810.()( . Big loy lable (BT-10) $1,000.00 EA I $1,000.()( Kompan MQ 100271 $6,000.00 EA I $6,000.()( Kompan GXY8014 $1,000.00 EA I $1,000.()( 4-foot-high black vinyl chain-link fence $15.00 LF 80 $1,200.0C $0.()( SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT $23,535.()( Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in Accordanct: $7,060.5( with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOTAL BOND PRICE $30,595.Sf Check out the ODES Web site at www .metrokc.gov/ddes Page 2 of 2 11614.009.xls L'-1 LandscapeBondQuantity b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 I ·.;_'.::-,. ., ..... ,,, .. ,.,, ·\:.· APPROVALS: ~ SH. ()RT,.P.L.AT NO. L04S0003 DEPARlMOH or OCVELOPWENT .-.i.o ENVIRONMENTAL SER"1CES O£PAR™DH or .lSSESSM[NTS : . .-:-~ --~ING ~TY. WASHINGTON :s::ro ,-o,.rn MS J.t.. 01,:~.fJAt._ 20.0,l ~~~ THIS 7,J.. DAY OF"~zooL ·.'" ' ~C'IOII.LANO~SOMSK»I ~cry'Tj_~~~~--.----- .:·· P:-ED.t.Np-=ms~OAYOF"~70G!1-~~~'-<~--- RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE J.(J'/ SCALE: f,. -II( ;2. 3" i oc,,r ~~ I illcll. • . ,/bEOtCAllON. ~ l{t•t ... -t .::'" • OU'\!TY o<NC COUNT't' ™ PORTION OF KNOW,ol.LLl'£CPL.Ee1)~~TS~i>1vTHE-~/IDD!Sl~EDO"<INEJl(S)_,~r:RtAENr~"rh ACOOJ<TIIU"'8EI! 61 WJ,l(>..OIBO SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4. SEC 33.TWN. 23 N.RG 5 E. W.M OF" .JlirIER£5T IN IH~·.t.ANO HD'lc!IY SH<J!.t."SI.IEICIW:CO. >e!a!Y DECURE Tl*S r-~'i=i';;;;,m:------------------;:====::;::;::;:;====:::-------...l.=-''---'C...~~;;=;~;';~~~:.._:..:_:.::.:_::.:__::._;_;_:.:__:=j ·~ 1~t'.lfo~=~~~~~~51;~~;._,~8J"~:~ LEGEND LINE TABLE SURVEY NOTES r.ER.Au_sulf1:n.......0:AVCNl.lE:Sl-l~fSUO..~s~,avJ,,J'E>;£l«DOIA~DE-+ STR ENT• T TOT ST TION D1CAT£ ™.~-tlSE: THEJ!tOF" FOR !J.1;.'PJBUc PU&POS£S NOT ~SISTENT Vim+ S S£T I.ION IN CASE SECTION CORNER LINE LENGTl1 SEARING CURVE TABLE IN u~ • • OPCON OPT 3000W Al A ~uif2~~~~~~{s~~m..~ ~E RI~~-·.-.•• :. EX PK NAil Ll 20.01 N01'20'23"E CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA' • t.lETHOO USED.~~ ~E~~~~~~ ~::~GI.ES '1He!E:cw IN ~(RIQNll. ~!b<A81.E GR~G CF SAIi) S1ltf;t:J5p;.NII) AVF.-ffi "O( MON IN CASE .-·· ·--~ QUAFHER CORNER L2 20.01 SD1"22"52"W c, Jll.5!, 25.00 88"20 Jl WAC ~2-130-090 ~fS. TR~t5~ :°'~ SH~ ~r~g; ~ ~-~ _. . o E)r::~EBAR I_ P1f>;,,.•' "),· L3 20.01 ND1"20'2J"E C2 39.99 25.00 91"39'29" DATE OF SUR\'EY: APRIL 2007 INOIC.._lEtl n,b!(ON_ Nq.\ll»lc WT ,ooruwllED 1!l"PAA11$"." OPO< SP.oq;:s:' ··-:·. AS:NOTED ::..":,;· (J;J CALa.JLATED L4 JO.QI S01"22'52"W 8AS1S Of" SEARtNG: SE 192nd STREET CENTERLINE ~~~~-~:~~C.,~:;!~=t /0 sci'.1/Z;'~'kBAR ···".-,,:(P) ~~ ~ENONffi~~~~?o~ITRN ,. P01SON <R (Nl!TY 0~ TIWl,TI£ PUe.JC;"t,1 'IIH!Cli CAS£ ~·oo HERE-/: ~n:~'.#38992 -.-.. (5-POQ.· 5 PRIVAtt ':JRA!NAG( EASEMENT RECORDS OF KING COUNTY • WA ENTITY IDENllf'tED ..,,c, ~OIi Tl1E ~.S]AlEtl. ;: •••• ,:' ,, > ,'"~, ; _ N 89"'J.4J9 W 1318.05' f P\ ~ '""-' . BY DEOICAJE SlJCI< s~ ["50,IQITS.. QR".'JRM:TS.Tb THE~ OIi •• '' •• • -• , • --A ,,COR-~ ·-u•E 47 PAGE 74 ~~~;~~~~~AN~d~_,~t'~ ~ -~ ----··_::~--.-'--,,~~89"3405" WJ__.31749' W _ ---_ ---_ g"AM:."Jr'A:cio!:~=-~~-:;,Y.._~~~:vDII ,-" • / '~ ~~t~~~"0'4'S Sf 188th STREET FOONDCONCI.ION BE OCC-"SIONCO BY ?l1E EST.l8.JSHMENT, CONSlllUCl!ON. OIi 1,1,<,h,,ha,i~i:;t.Clf'" {; , "-• W/BAR 1 o·w D 5'S ll+.\N a..MIIS R!:SUI.TtlC FROM IHAO£QU.._'IE MAl'-l'DJ.lNCE BY ~l'-G COUNTY. ~ElE IN ,, '• ,, (4/07) ROADS Ar.lO/Dfl MIOJN~CE SYSTEMS 'IIIMN THIS SHOl'H S1Al0MS10tl cilAER I FOUr<D PIPE IN (<1-J01) ' · x · ~ 1,-- °'"~~ETHl~N~~~~G:s~~~~~:...~-t:CASE (4/07): ; / j j I -_//' NIJ HOlO KING COIJ~. IT$ SOCCESS!RS AND ASSIGNS. IIARMUS$ n,o,1 NiY , L9;f J3 .· LOT JS LOT J9 LO 40 ~ ~~~ ~tH~~ TO~~~ ~~~; ; • • --,"--<It,-,,•·-· --f"·-:,,i';;;--'=""-'"'-"-";-';i!,;~~;,,,;;:,,:,--,,CJ.-,.;,;,-1---...J.,-,i,,:---~ IHI: GROUN) Sl.W"ACE. 'o'CGCTATIOH. DRAINAGE OR SIJRfAC( OR SUB-Sl.l'lf.._a: ,:,.. FUfCE oz .:t48,78 !48..,W FOUND PtN IN cs;:::sJ :C~ ~ .. :.u:.~ ~ =~n:i ~ ~~ST-::. ~ W. FOON~· 1n.'-.·REBAR N IN CA~~ ?l!(W,DE0 MS "",a: UCl a,«-.FICAllON SHAU HGT ec CONS1l'!JCtl AS 80I.M)R1' ~ LSfl89"1J LOT 6 C! "!'LEASING -.C COIJHTY, 11S SIJCIXSSORS OR ASSIGNS. f'!OM LIA8rl.HY FOR f Q",1' W a,·.Qg• S 7 420 f• ~ DNil,.Gf:S. INCl.UCll,IG JI,![ COST Cf E>EFEHSE. ~SIJ!.i..G IN 'olHQ..E OR" PAIIT I ·· ... , ... 14/0J) .• · • :: , ~-·•,,-,.,: sq. • rnowllllr~~~:~~~l~~~TS.JO -c: :: N8!1"'50'"52,"f; •. ·.·=: ,,~/ NB9'50'52'1'•:. ,,}·; HCUl HAR>.I...ESS IS ""'OE •l),t THE FR(E Cc»<SOU 4ND 1111:-SX:Of'IMOIC( ... l'I · · ~: THEOCSIRCS<:fSAIOO-Ell.S.OlJRll»ID~----A~-~A.LS. .• W,;:-.-..1 !!'--11;"';,(7.)::::'.:~:j• / ~-./ / • 11!f&.b~,~ UJ:---~I ~;: Jf..., ____ .. 7.~~o sq.ft. ,r _,._,_.2 ~- IC~ .._TICJl,I_._. ::_ W ~~ f!,.,; NB9'5()'52"[ . ..M69'50'52°E_..-'.; ._. ~,:: > ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 143:as 148.40__ _, .-re~ 51"'1£ OF W~l()N } •• J." OOJ: ~-1;.:r DATOC~:~::~:. ~7. ~ ~.'THE 1.NC!ER~...:..:~ ~~~i:,f~ 1HEJT:~~o'-!"'~~ ~.,_..__~ OF utE·~.._llCW JliAT·l><E:CUIEO tWf: FO!lEGOING IOISTJ!UM(NT, AJ«I A~'Sn!" rHSll!IJMENl Ta:& TiiE =• ~O -~I .lND DEto Cf SNll CORPORATION, FOf!:ll1E USES: All[l PU TICIOEtl, .o:10 ON OAlH SUlUI TIIAT•~ . IS AU , lllE SAID INS1RIJ .. DH I'.»< OCHHJ" Of"·.~ ~.i ~ \ . • .. -":.-.. n£ t:W'J~"ffl'~~~ s,;:r:tru AFTIX(l) ll<E [).t.Y AN0,,,,1 ~ ·<?.\Pu~:~o/_#f .. , . a:,;; · ... _,;~,/-<[~-~!,)~ .. ~ sf,.l( ·-,!,.,,,.,,,,,•' ·, Of W~. IIESltllM; AT t.-~ I.J,A ST.._JE Cf WASHNCTa. ) .. COUNTY Of ~ING ) ON 1HIS~ DAV Of Al.,,-..,,.4(' .. , 2007, SEf"Ol!I:: "E "Doi( UNDD!SICNED. A NOTARY~ l';f;O r~ ti<£ STAlt Cf" W,r.sHl>IGTOOI PERffi?;,.¥"PEARED or: 111E c'~A11~ -w.:n~~&i""',wTOJi FGREGOl>IG INST"RUME'-T, All() AOI'-~ SAID INSlRI.IMO<l 11:1 ~ 111E :foE~~~~c~~~~ ~cJ~s~~ll1~~s IS AUn-+ORlm> TO EX£W1E 1111: SAll INSTRUMENT CW OCl<AIJ Of SA.O ~·= . .)~=~=-·=--~ 1m111mnm1m1~11Hl~;!~J~f f0011~,,9~000f ... ,,. ~~-m.• : ~~ :1.'.li.Q _:; MANAGER --~f.:E42~~s·t <(---~;;: ;..,:,-.: <'< PS£ 10 UTILITY 11 ,;· _._-.· .-.-(01,0 ~:,: I ,,.. < o,o, o LOT 3 R£Cf20061121000560 8 ,. L01"·8 .: --~ cno, /J ,- .. ,··£t.;, ··•r ··a•. go~ NN g 7,443 sq.ft. lg -~.-•.-1_..,~2.(?-'SQ.tt,:;.· ·:; NN ;/~ ~ ,!_ £ ....,~~ "·.Jj. ~~ ... -·. !"l&l FE · ~ 5 ~-~-~ <-?1 ioN N89"'50'52"E N89.5(f52"'E"·· l"'lio .:-fr w .-.-; .. ·r~~i-{.-!'l!'l 148..89 PDE (nP) -1 1.i.a,40 ~~ "'~~-~ 1 :2 ~ _..-/ s·g . ~§1. . ..,.___ <'I ~ PSE 10· UTIUT'( EASEMENT f'lr 6 ti...., I w w .;:' _,,=· g~ S 7,445 sqfl )~ 7.420 sq.rt S ZZ ~{ff"'J" .._. ~;., l ~: ·' r-:... ~ ,• LOT2 IC! VREC#20061121D00560LOT9 f:! 00 3.:c§J ...c ~ 8 ../' .-( ~'5fi N89'50'52"E :; 0 ~ 5 5 II .•.. oss, ::l ··~. .· 48.76 d.J ·ii i (~9llks, TH,S ,~{i ,s OE<>C<: II ;,,~,~o~i ·: _ _,_-.-;... {El 5" POE ~Ql ~1 11.193 sq.ft. ~ TO TH[ PUBUC USE FOR TACI( IN COiCRETE MON .-. N89. 54"E ~: :· ,,~ . \ «> ROAD PVRPOSES UPOO THE r(N CASE (4/07) ·•:, .. .,.,... .. . .: • a..21· 8.. • ..._ RECORDING OF THIS SHORT N•1$,651.884 I 1 •. :, . TRACT A {R£C![ATIOl'C) : " Pl.AT. I [ .. I.JOS.U,8.346 I 29·~-__ ···°'.'6!!._sq.tt. _ _-:· ....... ,./1 )· C2--.._ ....+; . ....:..:·~---FOUND CONCR(T[ MON (NAD83/Ql) r---1 124 • .;;1-0 :· :· '·1 'fU"_5 / W/ REBAR ND CASE ·····~ "ot(J.54 E . .. .-:--,.... ss9·40'.54"w .., OESTROYED OUR!NG .-,.. .. R(:W OEDICA~ · . ··:: -' CONSTRUCTION (9/06} I . -·---:22' ·' :. . ·:155 21· 0 N89"40;~~-"E -~.4-ls J.£) .).,):t.J.:11 \r-'.J •. • g ~ ~ ,~ ~ : ., .. g ~lw 46'(C) "' ::::,I..-_ N eg·40"5-4__:-E 165 24" _ _ ____ ~6 ~ ~-~ ----~ CORNER SEC 33-2.l-5 (KC#S8()9) Na9·40•54 \32{ 83 (M) 1322.JO :fP) , , ~ a. l£AD &: TACK IN (BASS OF BEARl~)-(P) f:JllJNQ. BRASS Pl~' ').. •• ••• • CONCRE:Tt I.ION IN CASE (4/07) S89'J3'l)9"E 2643.06 (KC) SW CM to S 1/4 'N/PJNO.tN CONCR~IT , '5 N-1s9,a12.SJ (NAO SJf91> SE 192nd STREET IN c.1.SE (-4/o7) •• > ____ E•_1,~;~J7 (NAO 83/91) -~ LANO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS SHORT PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY J.IAO[ BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER~SION IN CONFORMA'-CE: 'M™ THE REOUIREI.IENTS 0. THE APPROPRIATE: STATE ~-9:f?.;'~ '}~'.STAR/TES AND ORDINANCE:~ 2007 Y-=- cERnr1cA Tt NO .... 38992. Cji=? TOUMA ENGINEERS IS& LAND SURVEYORS fl5Xl SQflH 1g1ST PlAa; $1.11,C C-102 • KHfT. ... M!O.l2 Pl'UIC (~) z,1.-F'AX ("25) .ZSl-t/125 CHKO. BY "" SHOR 0J} PLAT? ' .. J· p··:. P°ATE: •. . AF;'RiL 2007 sc .. , 1· --40' 1 of 2 ~ i:: l',..,~ J w" IS'--~ t: Q ~ i µ C ... I" . !I /!-lfT!l/#/J/J1 S, P.. c.Mjlf ,yffic.,,,trb .. -= .s-10-04-- t-OC/--SCJOO _I i. 0 7 r )(OJ.S- e, 1984-00/80 _.>(/J .?J-c.J-S- ,R-C. • RECORDfNG CHECKLIST ___a__k.1J REDLINES ADDRESSED_ //-·S-07 MIS Zo~E= J4'L ~2)0KTORECORD; /0-)•01 ROUTEDREQUESTTORECORD __aK._3) K.C. FlRE ENG. APPROVAL FOR FIRE FLOW .; f?7t < A 4) FINAL HEALTH (any restrictions?) Caution: Need to obtain Health approval to use the exemption note. .> b J -12k.__s) HOMEOWNERS ASSOClATION (incorporated) (;, ,,-f' f. e..,1-c,"' #}IJfil COVENENTS _of&_?) UPDATED PLAT CERTIFICATE (30days) -e4--8) LOT SUMMARY A/lei# tJIV S..P. __ 9) EXAMINERS REPORT CHECKED OFF J,/ov. 7 07 , _.L__IO) REVIEW VARIANCES AND COMMENTS UNDER PROJECT NO. __ II) FEES AND ACTIVITIES ~ 12) "FINAL PLATTING PROCEDURE" FORM A13) ADDRESSlNG ON PLAT .ILK.__ 14) ENGINEERING PLANS REFERENCED ON PLAT .~ ---D.ic-IS)ROADMITIGATION OK a)PROPERNOTE '\)e.%'-11 b)FEESPAID,1!,{1 ,/ AI6) SCHOOL MITIGATION __ a) PROPER NOTE __ b) FEES PAID _o_k,__17) PLAT RECORDING FEE j ((/. oo 418)BONDS __ a) PERFORMANCE __ b) WETLAND RESTORATION: __ PLAN __ BOND __ c) L-PLAN / RECREATION: __ ct) STREET TREE: PLAN PLAN BOND BOND #19) IF IN R-1 OR RA THEN VERIFY BASlN RE: KCC 2lA.12.030 19. __a}s_20) SPRINKLER OR PARKING RESTRICTION NOTE. ~28 COMMON FROPERTY !'ORM __ INGWBE WITH MYLARS. ~22) VERIFY IF TDR NOTE APPLYS TO THIS PROJECT. 0~ 23)NAD83/9I . ~ 9 l.o+-5. l..or I /,,,.5 ,l',y,,_,(f. !3D7Loi,s-. 0 I '! 18 (l,A,. <tvt ",._( 0 Jc J uwy /-fol4-~"~ ,, ~ f 14-+ aft:(/~ 1~/l"cf P-c< lMJti5 -/r,.;] ? Zo(. 411---2-7/Cf ce-1( , ti King County RED-1 PEERED PROJECT D.D.E.S. Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 DATE: NAME: FILE No.: ACTIVITY No.: August 27, 2007 RATHINAM S.P. L04S0003 L07FR035 The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the short plat is recorded. If you have questions·or need clarifications, please call Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197. __ !) 42) ---i 3) Need a Plat Certificate dated within 30 days prior to the recording of this short plat. Need a copy of the Final Health Approval. If on sewer in an urban area, current letters of approval of the sewer and water systems by the utility district may be accepted in lieu of Health Department approval. Ifthere was an existing well or septic system, please provide copies of the abandonment papers. For the King County Fire Marshal condition, please add the following note: "Any future residence constructed within this short plat must be sprinkled (NFPA 130) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee." ___ 'I) Complete construction of the required improvements or post a performance bond. 5) If there are NAO 83/91 coordinates within one mile of the project, add the coordinates and the inversed bearing between two controlling monuments, pursuant to KCC l 9A.08. l 30.B. --,.--6) Need signatures of all owners and mortgage beneficiaries. Signatures must be originals on the mylar map and notarized. Signatures and notary stamps must be in black ink. ___ 7) When the main issues / comments have been addressed, please contact King County Finance at 206-296-6659 to obtain final fees and financial guarantees. You can send email correspondence to fgmu.ddes@metrokc.gov. 8) a4: ok ok ok Regarding the Redline comments on Page I of 2: a) Remove the tax lot numbers on the adjoiner parcels. b) Generally show where the private drainage easements are located. c) Regarding the centerline and right of way margins of 11 "f1 Place SE: aa) The centerline location does not match the centerline of the right of way going North into the plat of Jessie Glen by about 2. 7 feet. Please verify and modify the centerline location as needed. bb) Verify that you want to set a centerline monument at the North boundary. It may be that the plat of Jessie Glen will monument the same point. 6k cc) The sidewalks in this plat need to be connected to the sidewalks in Jessie Glen. The walk in Jessie Glen is on the east side of 1171 h Pl SE while the walk for this short I plat is designed for the west side. A field change to the engineering plan set may be required in order to design a walk on the east side. Please discuss this with your King County inspector. 9) oi( Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 2: a) Insert "and as generally shown on sheet I of I of this short plat." into the maintenance note for the private drainage easements. ~ k b) o.f<. c) _iJ_ d) 4 e) _;t_ f) g) Remove the "Tract B Drainage Easement" note. Insert the missing verbiage in the Downspout Note. See verbiage contained in Condition 2.C. Remove the first three notes under General Notes. Insert the Homeowners Association name in General Note for Tract A. Remove the last two sentences for the Tract B note under General Notes. Insert the addressing ranges in the addressing note. I 0) Regarding the Short Plat certificate: ..aL a) A portion of exception no. 5 appears to be locatable -i.e. IO' adjoining the proposed dedicated right of way. Please show it on the map page, and add as a "Subject To" -- something like: "Subject To easement for electric facilities under recording no. 20061121000560." . 11) Regarding the Preliminary Conditions of Approval: 11 I,<, a) For preliminary conditions no.s l.C and 3.M.(4), please provide a note signed by the ' applicant stating something like: "To the best of my knowledge, all utilities serving this short plat that are within the public right of way are included within a franchise approved by the King County Council." __ak,__12) Please provide a copy of the sanitary sewer and water plans if applicable. 13) Please provide an electronic copy of the plat with the final mylars for King County GIS purposes. 14)Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTES: _cil Homeowners Association Covenant: The owners of all Lots I through 9 inclusive are responsible for providing that the _______ Homeowners Association continues to be a viable and functioning legal entity. Said Homeowners Association shall own and maintain the Tracts and easements as indicated and covenanted herein, unless otherwise approved by King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency. This covenant shall run with the land and is binding upon the owners of all Lots I through 9 inclusive, their heirs, successors and assigns. 2 DEMOLISHED RESIDENCE IMPACT FEE NOTE FOR SCHOOL IMPACT FEES: _n/4-Pursuant to KCC 21A.43, School impact fees for lots __ through __ shall be addressed at the time of building permit application. One residential unit was existing prior to the development of this subdivision. If the issuance of a new building permit for Lot occurs on or prior to (insert date of demo permit + 3years), then said lot shall be exempt from the payment of the school impact fees. If the issuance of a new building permit for said lot occurs after (insert date of demo permit + ]years), then the full assessed school impact fee, together with the current administration fee, must be paid at the time of building permit issuance. See K.C. code 21A.43.070.A.2." __aK._ Private Drainage Easement Covenant: The owners of private property within this Short Plat encumbered with drainage easements shown as "Private", hereby grant and convey to King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the right, but not the obligation to convey or store storm and surface water per the engineering plans approved for this Short Plat by King County, together with the right of reasonable access (ingress and egress), to enter said drainage easement for the purpose of observing that the owners are properly operating and maintaining the drainage facilities contained therein. The owners of said private property are responsible for operating, maintaining and repairing the drainage facilities contained within said drainage easement, and are hereby required to obtain any required permits, from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services prior to filling, piping, cutting or removing vegetation ( except for routine landscape maintenance such as lawn mowing) in open vegetated drainage facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the drainage facilities, contained within said drainage easement. This covenant shall run with the land and is binding upon the owners of said private property, their heirs, successors and assigns. _nk_ Tracts A and Bare considered "tracts" pursuant to KCC 19A.04.330; A "tract" is land reserved for specified uses including, but not limited to, reserve tracts, recreation, open space, sensitive areas, surface water retention, utility facilities and access. Tracts are not considered lots or building sites for purposes of residential dwelling construction. 3 "Construction work involving soil disturbance, grading, and filling of the site, including individual residential building pad preparation, is prohibited from October I through March 31, unless otherwise approved by King County DOES or its successor agency." Steve Van Patten, P.L.S. Engineering Review Section 4 ti King County RED-4 D.D.E.S. Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 DATE: NAME: FILE No.: ACTIVITY No.: November 9, 2007 RATHINAM S.P. L04S0003 L07FR035 The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the short plat is recorded. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197. I) 2) ti~ ' Complete the pending issues per RED-I. Regarding the Redline comments on Page I of 2: a) Add back on the legend definitions. They got dropped off on my copy. a\( b) Remove the tic or x sign -shown for the radius points for curves C 1 and C2. tN-3 ) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 2: a) Revise the MPS Note to the following note for one exemption to the impact fees: "ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOTS 2 THROUGH 8: This plat is subject to King County Code 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS). For Lots I through 8, the MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time. ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOT 9: One residential unit was existing and occupied within the three years prior to the application for development of this subdivision. Lot 9 in this plat shall be exempt from the payment of fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System. See King County Department of Transportation Public Rule 6.2.1.4. ROAD MPS FEES PERK.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOT 1: All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), for Lot I in this Short Plat have been paid." 4) You can probably go to mylars if the updated short plat certificate hasn't changed. Provide 6 paper copies. Steve Van Patten, P.L.S. Engineering Review Section I . WEEKLY ALERTS -Subdivision Recordings Name of Plat: Rathinam Short Plat Activity#: Zoning: R-6 Project#: L04S0003 Parcel# 0822059182 Number of Lots: 9 Site square footage: 97,984 S.F. Applicant/ Developer: Charter Homes, Inc. Final Plat Review Engineer: Steve Van Patten Preliminary Plat Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi Preliminary Plat Review Engineer: Curt Foster Engineer Review: Ted Cooper (Critical Areas)Reviewer: Nick Gillen, Larry West Development Inspector: Mike Meins Plat Location: East Renton, Panther Lake area Date: 12-07-07 Issue Date: Public Open Space: 0.000 acres BUILDABLE LANDS Address/Location: Sensitive Areas Tracts (total square feet): Processed by: svan Private Open Space: 0.130 acres Subarea: Public Purpose Dedication Tracts (total square feet): Rights-Of-Way Tracts (total square feet): Road dedications (total square feet): Future Development Tracts/Other (total square feet): Lots (total square feet): Major# Notes/Comments: '® King County Department ofDeveJopment and Environmental Sen'ices . 900 .Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 ProjecfNo. >= Le>o)OOOO(· S0BDIVl$10N -and SHORTSUBPIMISION REQUEST TO RECORD Interoffice Memo Land Use Inspection Section RE: Project Name:I.L"-'SL!..-'=--"=-:.,....='-'-.L.:./e..::,_T-'--c~ Project No.: LO tf SO O O 5 /:}__ Ci. fi./~ S'~ -1: t> /t..-1-. Project name as shown on recording docwnent: ~-?·'::@· ': ·~ 0 l~ ii Final Activity No.: --=l=-0=---:7-=...F._,_J?.-==-=0~:f=..:,S-ce._ __ _ .• ,,,.__ ~~~ 1 ·. , \, Inspection Activity No.: -· ~--~) e-~ei~oject for the following items: t -,~ 9P--. \ -~J.a1f1fifs';~:spection Section does not recommend recording if any item is marked No \~ I. KCC 9.04.090(c): Are those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to acconnnodate the control of flows discharging from the sites constructed and fa operation, per publicR/1) rule? __ Yes _V_ NNno_ __N/A 2. Are water mains and hydrants installed? (must also be approvedrFire Marshall) · __ Yes _V_NN~o __ .NIA 3. Are roadways graded to all lots capable of pro~g access by passenger vehicles? --~~ _._No · 4. Are specific site improvements required by prelimmary apprJ'1 installed? . ___ Yes __ No NIA ~A 5. Is sensitive area to remain undeveloped delineated? Yes No 6. Is temporary control monuments set by Land Surveyor? · Yes NIA 7. Are all safety h;izards addressed? Yes ' ' Pagel of2 Thinley, Tenzing From: Thinley, Tenzing Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:30 AM To: 'Bob Thompson' Cc: Kara, Falin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg; Mott, Linda; Steve VanPatten; Steve Townsend; Jeff Pray Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob: This email is to address items that need to be completed prior to recording. 1.)As per emails below, DOT has directed you that illumination items can be bonded prior to recording. However, King County Code 19A.08.160 {http_:J/wwJ111.me_trokc.g9v/c_ouncil/code/22-Title%2019A.p_dJ) requires all safety issues addressed and the illumination plan is included as a safety requirement for pedestrian areas(KCRS 5.05). Any waiver to this requirement(example-a financial guarantee to be tied to the occupancy permit) will have to be approved by the Developement Engineer(Jim Sanders) not DOT. 2)Verification that the pond, control structure and sd lines are built per plans by your Engineer or licensed surveyor. Provide dimensions and as built elevations at the inlets and outlets, corner stakes, overflow elev at control structure and overflow structure, surrounding berms and slopes. ·b~\o-1( 3) Water main and hydrant installation approval. 4)Temporary control monuments set by surveyor. 5) Tract B corners staked. 6) The site bond quantity work sheet you provided does not match the original. Submit bond quantity calcs that match original amounts. 7) The street tree bonds and landscaping bonds will be required as per approval letter. .",,. 8) The final plat map is currently being revised to address CL change etc. I will need to review final map prior to recording- ¥ to make sure it matches construction dwgs. The plat name on the "request to record" form is "West Creek" but the initial l:f'1,o1,'I'-plat name provided is called "Rathinam". Update final plat name on recording maps. Note: if plat names are changed, the o construction dwgs will also have to be changed prior to final approval{not required prior to recording). 9) Provide certificate of insurance as per htti:>://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/l-info-drainins.[Jdf. This should have been in place since the preconstruction meeting. Thank you. Tenzing Thinley, PE Engineer 11-DDES/LUIS Phone: 206-296-7038 Fax: 206-296-7174 From: Mott, Linda Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:59 AM To: Bob Thompson; Thinley, Tenzing 10/08/2007 •' .. Page 2 of2 Cc: Kara, Fatin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob, My supervisor, Norton Posey, has directed me to advise you that the approved design must be followed and King County must own the system upon completion. As I understand it, the roadway serving the plat does not have the final lift, so you have the opportunity to complete the trench crossing and push under the sidewalks before this occurs. If the paving has taken place, you can push under the roadway as well, rather than open it up. As far as moving the time for completion of the illumination system out, discussions with DD ES/DOT Supervising Engineer Fatin Kara indicate that we can readily tie the illumination to the Occupancy Permit to give you time to secure an electrical contractor, procure the poles and build the system. I highly recommend contacting an electrical contractor as soon as possible since most vendors require 30 to 120 days to manufacture and ship the poles. To address your concerns regarding the service connection to PSE, the design can be modified to place the service cabinet on the west side of the driveway. We request that it be placed in a location that does not block visibility of approaching vehicles. If you would like on-site direction regarding the cabinet placement, I can meet with you. I regret that I can not scale back the design to make it easier for you to complete. However, it is not in the County's (taxpayer's) best interest to do so. Please let me know if you have questions. Regards - Linda Mott Engineer Ill, Signal & Illumination Design King County Dept. of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section 201 S. Jackson St, KSC-TR-0222 Seattle, WA 98104 PH: (206) 263-6140 1'enzing, please note that Traffic agrees tbe illumination can be tied to the Occupancy Pc1mit. Please let Mr. Thompson and I know that this change has been received and will be enforced by you (DDES). Thank you. Linda 10/08/2007 From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:20 AM To: Mott, Linda Subject: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Good morning Linda, I am checking to see if there is any progress in the illumination at Rathanam. I know you should not have to be doing this and I am sorry that I am making my problem your problem, but as we discussed in our meeting last Thursday the first issue is being able to associate the illumination with the Final Occupancy of the first home instead of the recording of the plat. Have you been able to get any answers for me? What ever information you can give me will help. Thank you very much, Bob '. ® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division l\lotice of Decision 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Appeal Procedure: ) (Type 2) Except for shoreline pennits which are appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings Board, this decision may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m, on October 4, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing foe of$250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on October 11, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief .· sought. The scope. of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted.to the Department ofDevelopmerlt and Environmental Services (ODES) at the following address: September 17, 2004 Date Mailed DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the DOES Planner at the telephone . number listed above. Ifyoli require this material in Braille, audiocassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). P96\1pre\Notice o! DeciBiOll,T)'pel.doc 7/l?/99 clc . ' KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 REPORT AND DECISION SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L04S0003 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: This is a short subdivision of 2.2 acres into 9 lots for detached single-family dwellings in the R-6 zone. The proposed density is six dwelling units per acre. The proposed Jot sizes range from approximately 16,427 square feet to 5,690 square feet. Please see Attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. 8. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Applicant: Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: .Fire District: School District: Sharmila Rathinam 24006 SE 101h Street Sammamish, WA 98015 (425) 369-2198 Cramer Northwest Inc. 945 North Central Suite 104 Kent, WA 98032 (253) 852-4880 SW Y. 33-23-05 11634 192"d Street, Renton R-6 2.2 9 Six du/acre Ranges from 16,427 to 5,690 square feet Single family Soos Creek Water & Sewer District · Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Fire District 40 Renton School District Complete Application Date: March 10, 2004 Associated Application: Road Variance File No. L04V0017 C. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The site is relatively flat. It slopes down gently from west to southeast. 2. Soils: One soil type is found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973. The entire site is classified as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB). The following is the soil characteristics: Report & Decision Page I of9 L04S0003 AgB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitat[ons for . septic tank filter fields .due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folio, no mapped hydrographic · features exist on or near this site.· The site lies within the Soos Creek drainage basin. · 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in combination of weeds and grasses. Scattered evergreen/deciduous trees and brush occur in limited numbers. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the property. · 6. Mapped Sensitive Areas: The Sensitive Areas Folio does not identify any mapped sensitive areas as being present on this site. D. DESIGN FEATURES 1. Density, Lot Pattern, Comprehensive & Community Plan/SDO: The site has a density of six dwelling units per acre. The proposal is for 9 lots which is less than the base density afforded by the zone. The proposed lot sizes ranges from approximately 6,000 square feet to 16,000 square feet. Lot 7 is the largest which can be subdivided in the future to achieve the . base density of the original parcel. · The proposal is subject to S0-220-significant tree retention requirements. 2. Access/Roadway Section: Access to the short subdivision will be via a newly constructed road which will be extended north from SE 192"ct Street. A temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed at the north terminus of this road. All lots will have direct access to the newly constructed road. 3. Drainage: Surface water runoff leaves the site at the SE property corner and is conveyed along SE 192"d Street in an easterly direction. The proposed drainage· facility will be located on-site near the property low point. It will be required to meet the level II flow control and basic water quality requirements. 4. Other Design Features: the proposal include a 4,500 square -foot tract for play and recreational activities. A conceptual recreation tract detailing the play faculties and landscaping will be required at the engineering plan submittal. 5. Utlllties: The proposed lots will be served by public water and sewer managed by the Soos Creek Water ai:,d Sewer District. A certificate of water and sewer availability dated June 19, 2003 has been issued for this proposal. E. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This short subdivision application is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C. F. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Report and Decision LO!tS0003 G. Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (i.e. 1993 King County Road Standards, 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approvaL · DECISION: Proposed Short Plat revised and received August 26, 2004 (Attachment 1) is GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; subject to the following conditions of final· approval: 1. . Title 19A . D. (<.€vtJeD ,ire fJlftJ./? Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A. of the King County Code All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. · All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise . approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording Modifications to the approved preliminary site plan (Attachment 1) are needed to allow for the extension of JUDT to lots 3 and 5. A revised site plan shall be submitted to DOES for review and approval. If additional modifications are required to accommodate engineering conditions, then those must be included in the revised plan. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal; · 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter One of the Surface Water Design Manual. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable · Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the.following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9,04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. A. B. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit drainage and engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by ODES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the DOES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain Report and Decision · · Ll)!#S0003 outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with ODES and/cir the Department of Transportation. · This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the. time of the. building permit and shall complywith the plans on file." 3. 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the KCRS, including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be. prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. ODES strongly recommends the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. All construction and. upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall be done in accordance with KCRS established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS) and shall comply with the following requirements: A. A road variance application regarding intersection spacing was approved by King County on May 17th, 2004. The final engineering plans for the short plat shall comply with all conditions of approval for the road variance decision. B. That portion of the north half of SE 192nd Street adjoining the subject property shall be improved to an urban principal arterial standard per KCRS Section 1.03. oK C. Twenty feet (20) of additional right-of-way for SE 192nd Street shall be dedicated along the south property line, allowing for 50 feet of right-of-way from centerline. D. av--·· .E. * F. *: G. J. K. L. The on-site road shall be constructed to a public urban subaccess standard per KCRS Section 2.03. . A 25-foot property line radii shall be dedicated at the intersection of the on-site road and SE 192"~ Street per KCRS Section 2.10. . The joint-use-driveway tract (JUDT) shall be extended to reach lots 5 and 3. Lots 3 and 5 shall have undivided ownership of the access Tract and be responsible for its maintenance. A note to this effect shall be placed on the engineering plans and final plat. The minimum roadway improvements within the JUDT shall be 18 feet wide and 20 feet long with.controlled drainage: This tract shall also meet the Fire Marshal requirements (See Fire marshal requirements for additional access standards): A temporary cul-de-sac shall be provided at the north terminus of the on-site road per KCRS Section 2.08). The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required when widening existing asphalt. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRS 5.03. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. Report and Decision L~0003 · M. * * The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance: · (2) There shall be no direct vehicular access to and from SE 192"d Street from the abutting lots (KCRS Section 2.02). Access shall be from the on-site road. 11\~ (3) Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac and extension of the sidewalk shall 0 be the responsibility of the developer who extends the road. & ef~ . n't~ .f ~' (4) All utilities within proposed rights-of-way shall be included_ within a t franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short subdivision recording. (5) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on t he final recorded short subdivision. 4. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the stiort plat. 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) The applicant shall comply with all aP,plicable provisions of KCC 16.82. · r1..ee f-e;T ~ CUE<tlt.l'<IC t G/Ul u,,vG The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with KCC 16.82.150 requirements at engineering and final short plat. 6. Fire Code (KCC 17)-Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code: * ~ A. All portions of the exterior walls (at grade) of future residences constructed within this short plat must be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved ~ ;:, . ~ 8 . ..., ,J ~ '-le- " "t:;: C. access is a mjnimum 20-foot wide driving surface that supports 25 tons in all weather, is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end and with no gradient in excess of 15% . If a suitable access as described above is not provided, any future residences constructed on lots 3, 5 and 9 MAY have to be sprinklered per NFPA 13D · The proposed driveways serving the main body of these lots does not meet I he minimum 20-foot width requirement and portions of the exterior walls may be over 150 feet from approved access as outlined above. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the .fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which Report and Decision L()lfS0003 *'. B. fU4T /./o,6 C. do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Three additional lots may be created through the subdivision of Lot 7 as long as the zoning of the site remains R-6. This shall be noted on the recorded short plat. Lot 7 shall be developed in such a way that does not prevent any future short subdivision. Street Trees (KCC 21A. 16) Street trees shall be provided along the street frontage and the new on site road as follows .(per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21 A.16.050): 1. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections.· 2. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right~of-way. 3. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. 1--4. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the · County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat 5. . The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers. or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. 6. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. 7. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 192nd is on a bus route. If it is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro.· 8. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond · posted prior to recording of the short plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. D. P-Suffix/ SDO Conditions (KCC 21A.38)-To implement KCC 21A.38.230 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan and the engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.38.230, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan which is part of the hearing record for this project. No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be Report and Decision LO/iS0003 E. provided, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B4. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC · 21A.38.230B4d(2). coi,.f'1~ • =+r~.. o-f -r-,+ If · The 4500-sqaa. -foot ,ec,sation tract is consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). (1). An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES, with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and general improvements. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the overall conceptual .. plan. (2). A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with the overall conceptual plan, as detailed in item a., shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES arid King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the final plat documents. The landscape plan shall be prepared in accordance with KCC 21A.16. (3). A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 8. Road Mitigation Payment System oU. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording, or (B.) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14:75; Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid:" If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. A homeowner's association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DOES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the Recreation Tract. · Other Considerations A. B. C. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other . regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit ,an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances The short subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. r,rc.e. /Lif-,1c.. .. ' CL ell.A/Al C. I C/f.APrAJ(. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division Report and Decision L01S0003 Appeal Information and Parties of Record RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner,.with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) caJendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on October 4, 2004. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. . If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) ahd the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner ofjurisdiction to consider the appeal. · Appeals must be submitted.to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre-hearing conference. For more information regarding . appeal proceedings and pre-hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Parties and Persons of Interest: Dehkordi, F ereshteh Project Manager II DDES/LUSD· Foster, Curt Sr. Engineer DDES/LUSD Hudson, Rich Program Manager ill DDES/LUSD Kokesh, Robert & Arlene 7695 SW Westmoor Way Portland, OR 97225 Report and Decision LO.~S0003 Rathinam, Shannila 24006 SE lo 1h Street Sammamish, WA 98075 Wilson, Teny Cramer Northwest. Inc. 945 N. Central, Suite #104. Kent, WA 98032 Report and Decision L~0003 ..... ·----·-----.-..... ---. ' --.. . ' ' . King County Project No. >= LOOXXXXX SUBDIVISION Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 and SHORT SUBDIVISION REQUEST TO RECORD Interoffice Memo 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov DA TE: //-$" -0 ] TO: [:\\ 't:fL {J '-'1..> j Land Use Inspection Section RE: Pro j eel Name: ..Lg__o_a"'-'+I..'-"'---'' l:..,n:,___a..._,l,vlc::..,__.,,s:;c..,"t,.=· Lrf..!.._L~-'Y.-'4"-.!.-t-__ Project NO.: Final Activity No.: La <7--S'OocJ j ;__01r1<..{)ss- Inspection Activity No.: L 05'5/ t "'2..B Please inspect the above-referenced project for the following items: The Land Use Inspection Section does not recommend recording if any item is marked NO KCC 9.04.090(c): Are those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the control of flows discharging from the sites constructed and in operation, per public RID rule? _£,__ Yes __ No KCC 19A.08.160: 1. Water mains and hydrants installed? (must also be approved by Fire Marshall)? LYes No 2. Roadways graded to all lots capable of providing access by passenger vehicles? _x. Yes No 3. Specific site improvements required by preliminary app10val installed? IJ/A Yes No 4. Sensitive area to remain undeveloped delineated? N/ A Yes No 5. Temporary control monuments set by Land Surveyor? ____x_ Yes No 6 All safety hazards addressed? _)( Yes No GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I. There are no objections to the recording of the subdivision, and issuance of building permits/ -X-Yes No 2. Are there any building lots on this plat which should have further cview or engil\eering prior to building construction? If so, identify lots and describe concerns in comment section. "1:J 3. Minimum Performance Financial Guarantee.required for recording i; $ 50, 0tP~. oCJ . Cash or Assignment of Fund Restoration Financial Guarantee may be used if a Performance Agreement to • I Cotl)ylete form is completed. , j,, N01"'~: ,1t.,J,f•CA K 'f1-%-~rr' F.6. ~O ?U'--1.~G..twv1 <:\>1t 1 :i--loCJ. _. 4. Minimum Landscaping Financial Guarantee amount required for recordhg is (.$ ________ _ 5. Minimum Recreation Financial Guarantee amount required for recording is $ "2.Eb., 4'==13,,. ~ 6. Minimum Street Trees Financial Guarantee amount required for recording is $ 0,Doo-.o~ ' Inspector's signature and date: Financial Guarantee Compliance Enginee_r Initials and date: RETURN TO: S:-k.ve J ...... P ... ±f-t. ".\ , Engineering Review Section Original: Platting Engineer Copy I: FGMU Copy 2: Inspector Copy 3: BF Engineer S/Current Form.Present.Req-tRec.mem/10.19.07 . . ' VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rogers, Carol Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:52 AM VanPatten, Steve; Meins, Mike Pray, Jeff; Floren!, Ray L04S0003 Rathinam Short Plat We received all the financial guarantee papers required for recording yesterday in good order; also all fees were paid. Carol ....... 1 §HARM.ILA RATHiNAM 9 -LOT SHORT PLAT Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Numbers: L07FR035 -(Revision of L04S0003) 08/27/07 Fire Engineering approval may be granted with the following conditions: AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Supervisor, Fire Engineering. Telephone: (206) 296-6785 *** SPRINKLER REQUIREMENT *** Any future residence constructed within this short plat is required to be sprinkled NFPA l3D unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. Vehicles parked on roadway surfaces are an obstruction. To remove the sprinkler requirement the curb-to-curb roadway driving surface width cannot be less than 36 feet. Fire System Review Approval Conditions Page I of I ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW -Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Project Name: RANTHINAM SP -L04S0003 Project Location: 11806 192ND ST BOB THOMPSON CHARTER HOMES, INC. 601 UNION ST STE 5100 SEATTLE, WA 98101 Project Management Statement Statement Date: 11/19/2007 Customer: Permit#: L07FR035 Project#: L04S0003 Parcel Number: 6198400180 Permit Type: FINAL Status: REVIEWED Page I of3 Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: Description · C.ounter S.ervii:e'. Fees'. i ·' Recording Fees Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Managed Project Budget: 1 Total Amount Deferred: ' ,AMOUNT DUE AT.APPLICATION: Installment Payments: Schedulea for 11/1/2007 Scheduled for 12/1/2007 Scheduled for 1/1/2008 Total Deferred Installments: . Pa ments: Date Posted Payment Type 7/17/2007 Check '' 1, ' 9/20/2007 · 'Chee!<°'.: 1 i"fl'• Total Payments Received: CkloglD ' ' ' ' CURRENT (Exclud~il 1Defe;red Amount,': Total Balance:.·· ,II . Amount I I I : $205.28 $111.00 $316.28 $9,660.00 Amount. $485.28 .' '.'$9 380.00 ... ,' ····1' 1,1 $111.00 Deferred $0.00 $4,830.00 $4,830.00 ·· $1,610.oo .. $1 610.00 $3,220.00 Check# 13152 9679 69.00 32.75 36.25 Due Now $205.28 $111.00 $316.28 $4,830.00 $5,146.28 $1,610.00 $1,610.00 ($9,865.28) '$0.00 Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee \ \ .. \. ' ', Issued by Guarantee No.: 4209·1030438 / First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Ave/ Ste 800/ Seattle/ WA 98121 Title Officer: Pat Fullerton Phone: (206)728-0400 FAX: First American Titfe Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 1 First American Title Team One First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Ave, Ste 800 Seattle, WA 98121 Phn • (206)728-0400 (800)826-7718 Fax - Pat Fullerton (206) 615-3055 Fax No. (866) 904-2177 Colleen Franz (206) 615-3050 Jennifer Salas (206) 615-3011 jsalas@firstam.com pfullerton@firstam.com cfranz@firstam.com LIABILTIY FEE $ $ Amy Garza (206) 615-3010 amgarza@firstam.com Tina Kotas (206) 615-3012 tkotas@firstam.com 1,000.00 FOURTH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE ORDER NO.: 350.00 TAX$ 31.15 YOUR REF.: First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company 4209-1030438 Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Charter Homes, Inc. herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: November 07, 2007 at 7:30 A.M. First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) FOURTH REPORT SCHEDULE A Toe assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Guarantee No.; 4209-1030438 Page No.: 2 B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any porition thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. Toe following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: TRACT 9, BLOCK 1, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE Pl.AT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF Pl.ATS, PAGE(S) 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APN: 619840-0180-03 First American ntle ./ Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) RECORD MATIERS: 1. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2007, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 2. 'Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. 3. 4. Grantor/Trustor: Grantee/Beneficiary: Trustee: Amount: Recorded: Recording Information: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Washington First International Bank First American Title Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation $1,275,000.00 May 12, 2006 20060512001282 Note: This Deed of Trust contains Line of Credit privileges. If the current balance owing on said obligation is to be paid in full in the forthcoming transaction, confirmation should be made that the beneficiary will issue a proper request for full reconveyance. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terms and conditions thereof: Assignor: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Assignee: Washington First International Bank Recorded: May 12, 2006 Recording Information: 20060512001283 Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: November 21, 2006 J Recording Information: 20061121000560 ...../5. In Favor of: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation For: Transmission line Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, fence line/boundary discrepancies, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 4 recorded in Volume 47 of Plats of Plats, Page(s) '74 . INFORMATIONAL NOTES F. General taxes for the year 2007, which have been paid. Tax Account No.: 619840-0180-03 Code Area: Amount: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: 4250 $ $ $ 3,734.05 317,000.00 0.00 A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209·1030438 Page No.: 4 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: {a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or as.sessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a publlc agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions In patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims Or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for Joss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the Jines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result In the invalidity or potential Invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. {d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDmONS AND STIPULATIONS 1, Definition of Terms. The following terms when used In the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured In this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or In Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does llOt include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgageN: mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records" : records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Clalmant, An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause Joss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to , which the Assured ls a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4, Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at lts sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited In (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or Interest as stated herein, or to establish the llen rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not Jt shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise \ts rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise \ts options as stated ln Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of lts choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid In any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which In the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or Interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of Joss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company Is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's ob\lgatlon to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examlne, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All Information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, In the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary Information from third parties as required In the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Fonn No. ·12s2 (Rev. 12115/95) Rrst American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) 6, Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, If this Guarantee ls issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upan the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required In that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or otheiwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the As.sured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or In the name of an Assured claimant any claim As.sured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for In Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the As.sured under this Guarantee for the claimed toss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Llablllty. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the As.sured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of llability stated in Schedule A or In Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or Interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or Interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. e. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or wlth the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 5 (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liablllty or Termination of Llablllty. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. {b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11, Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, an right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property ln respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle In the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the As.sured shall have recovered Its principal, Interest, and costs of collection, 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbltrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the As.sured arising out of or relating to thls Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules In effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land ls located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company Is the entire Guarantee and contract between the As.sured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14, Notices, Where Sent. AU notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnlshed the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg, 2, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Foon No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) Rrst American Title :, Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee ( 4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 1 First American Title Team One First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Ave, Ste BOO Seattle, WA 98121 Phn • {206)728--0400 (800)826-7718 Fax - Pat Fullerton (206) 615-3055 pfullerton@flrstam.com Fax No. (866) 904-2177 Colleen Franz (206) 615-3050 cfranz@firstam.com Jennifer Salas (206) 615-3011 jsalas@firstam.com LIABILI1Y FEE $ $ Amy Garza (206) 615-3010 amgarza@firstam.com Tina Kotas (206) 615-3012 tkotas@firstam.com 1,000.00 THIRD SUBDMSION GUARANTEE ORDER NO.: 350.00 TAX$ 31.15 YOUR REF.: First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company 4209-1030438 Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Charter Homes, Inc. herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. L!ABILI1Y EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing ti~e evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: August 27, 2007 at 7:30 A.M. First American Title , Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee ( 4-10-75) THIRD REPORT SCHEDULE A Toe assurances referred to on the face page are: A. 1itle is vested in: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 2 B~ That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any porition thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. Toe following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: TRACT 9, BLOCK 1, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 74, IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. APN: 619840-0180-03 First American Tttle .1 Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) RECORD MATTERS: 1. General Taxes for the year 2007. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 619840-0180-03 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 1,867.03 Amount Paid: $ 1,867.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 317,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 1,867.02 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 1,867.02 Assessed Land Value: $ 317,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2007, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 3. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. 4. 5. Grantor/Trustor: Grantee/Beneficiary: Trustee: Amount: Recorded: Recording Information: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Washington First International Bank First American Title Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation $1,275,000.00 May 12, 2006 20060512001282 Note: This Deed of Trust contains Line of Credit privileges. If the current balance owing on said obligation is to be paid in full in the forthcoming transaction, confirmation should be made that the beneficiary will issue a proper request for full reconveyance. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terms and conditions thereof: Assignor: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Assignee: Washington First International Bank Recorded: May 12, 2006 Recording Information: 20060512001283 Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: November 21, 2006 Recording Information: 20061121000560 In Favor of: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation For: Transmission line Rrst American 7itle Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 4 6. Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, fence line/boundary discrepancies, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 4 recorded in Volume 47 of Plats of Plats, Page(s) 74 . INFORMATIONAL NOTES A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. Rrst American ntte ., Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209~1030438 Page No.: s SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. {b) {1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under ( 1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the publlc records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the COmpany assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: · (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described In the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or Improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d} The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown ?T referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDmONS AND STIPULATIONS 1, Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the COmpany. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to In Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, Interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security Instrument (d) "public records" : records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Clalm to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the COmpany promptly in writing In case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which mlght cause loss or damage for which the company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth In Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b}, or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establlsh the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4{a} the Company shall have the right to select counsel of lts choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or Interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, In its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d} In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at Its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the company, an Assured, at the company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, proseOJting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establlsh the title to the estate or Interest as stated herein, or to establish the llen rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these COnditions and Stipulations have been provided to the COmpany, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90} days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the company is prejudiced by the fallure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, Inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the company, the Assured shall grant Its permission, in writing, for any authorlzed representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, OOoks, ledgers, checks, correspQndence and memoranda In the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the company, it is necessary In the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the alxlve paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Form No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) Rrst American Tltle Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee ( 4-10-75) 6. Options to Pay or otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Llablllty. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by sa!d mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder .. In the event after notice of c!aim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign sald indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the c!almed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required In that paragraph, shall terminate, Including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b} To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under th!s Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company Is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option pl'ovided for In Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required ln that paragraph, shall terminate, Including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or In Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid prlncipal Indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as !!mited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stlpulatlons or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or {c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or Interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. a. Umltatlon of Liablltty, (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee !n a reasonably diligent manner by any method, Including litigation and the completton of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully pecformed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. Guarantee No.: 4209~1030438 Page No.: 6 (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Llablllty or Termination of Llablllty. AU payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a} No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11, Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use tne name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation Involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may Include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbltrable matters.when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered In any court having jurisdiction thereof. The !aw of the situs of the land sh'all apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Llablllty Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with aH endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (C) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14, Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg. 2, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Fonn No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee .. : ·: .. _ ... ..,,:·~ ··. ",!J,,.,.,• ' . ·~ ', .. Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 \ \ I { :' ! I ' ·· .. ' .. 1.:.-:., ,, " Issued by First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Ave, Ste 800, Seattle, WA 98121 Title Officer: Pat Fullerton Phone: (206)728-0400 FAX: First American Title First AmenCan Title -1 Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 1 First American First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Ave, Ste 800 Seattle, WA 98121 Phn • (206)728-0400 (800)826-7718 Fax - Pat Fullerton (206) 615-3055 pfullerton@firstam.com Title Team One SECOND COMMITMENT Fax No. (866) 904-2177 Colleen Franz (206) 615-3050 cfranz@firstam.com Jennifer Salas (206) 615-3011 jsalas@firstam.com LIABILITY FEE $ $ Amy Garza (206) 615-3010 amgarza@firstam.com Tina Kotas (206) 615-3012 tkotas@firstam.com SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 1,000.00 ORDER NO.: 350.00 TAX$ 31.15 YOUR REF.: First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company 4209-1030438 Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Charter Homes, Inc. herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: July 30, 2007 at 7:30 A.M. First Amen'can Title ok Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) SECOND REPORT SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 2 B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any porition thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: TRACT 9, BLOCK 1, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 74, IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. APN: 619840-0180-03 First American Title 'I ok ak ok Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) RECORD MATTERS: 1. General Taxes for the year 2007. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 619840-0180-03 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 1,867.03 Amount Paid: $ 1,867.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 317,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 1,867.02 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 1,867.02 Assessed Land Value: $ 317,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2007, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be Included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 3. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor(rrustor: Grantee/Beneficiary: Trustee: Amount: Recorded: Recording Information: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Washington First International Bank First American Title Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation $1,275,000.00 May 12, 2006 20060512001282 Note: This Deed of Trust contains Line of Credit privileges. If the current balance owing on said obligation is to be paid in full in the forthcoming transaction, confirmation should be made that the beneficiary will issue a proper request for full reconveyance. 4. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terms and conditions thereof: 5. Assignor: Assignee: Recorded: Recording Information: Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation Washington First International Bank May 12, 2006 20060512001283 Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: November 21, 2006 Recording Information: 20061121000560 In Favor of: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation For: Transmission line Jl.)/J JGC. T /0 1; SH0<0 lo C a.. lo., /!..I<-./ First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee ( 4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 4 6. Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, fence line/boundary discrepancies, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 4 recorded in Volume 47 of Plats of Plats, Page(s) 74 . INFORMATIONAL NOTES A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. First American Title ,, Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee ( 4-10-75) Guarantee No.: 4209·1030438 Page No.: 5 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or tltle to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, enrumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDmONS AND STIPULATIONS 1, Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constiMe real property. The term "land" does not indude any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or watefways. (c) ''mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security Instrument. (d) npublic records" : records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to p.irchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured Is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4, Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, inter]x>se a defense, as limited in (b ), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated In Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purp::ise. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calrulating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the cust<Xfy or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary Information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Form No. IZ82 (Rev. 12/15/95) First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtecttess, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the company upon payment of the l)Jrchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required ln that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated ln Schedule A or In Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8, Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. Guarantee No.: 4209-1030438 Page No.: 6 (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Uability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been k>st or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, Interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbib'ation. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevalling party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbltrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the litle Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Umlted to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attadied hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In Interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg. 2, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Form No. 1282 (Rev. l]JIS/95) Rrst American Title >-· B€IJlRN ADDRESS: Puget Sound Eno,gy. Inc. Attn: ft/W Departm•nt (J, Mal) PO BOx 908&8 / EST~W Betktvue, WA 98009 REFERENCE#: 20061121-.:: EASEMENT GRANTOR: CHARTER HOMES. INC. GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SliORT LEGAL: Portion ol Trnct. 9, Block 1, Northwottem Gardon Tracts Division No. 4 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX ~ARCEL: 811840-0180 For and In eonaidlffldion of One Dollar ($1.00} and other valuable con1ideratlon In hand paid, CHARTER HOMES, INC. ("Grantot' herein). hereby oonveya and warranll to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ("Grantee" herein). fof the purposaa hereinafter set forth, a no01SXdusive perpetual easement over. under, along. acroas. and through the following described real property ("Property" herein) ln King County, Washington; TRACT 9, Bl.oCK 1, NOR'ntWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS 0MSl0N No. 4 1 ACCORDING TO THE Pt.AT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOULME 47 OP PLAT8, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHlNOTON. Except •• may be othefwlse set for1h h1W81n OrantN'I rights st\all be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Ea1181TWtt Area• herein) dnatbecl u follows: fHfMENJ Ng, 1: ALL STREETS AND .ROAD RtGHTS-oF-WAY (BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC) AB NOW OR HEREAFll!R DESIGNED, PLATTED, ANDIOR C0N8lRUCT1!D WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (WHEN SAID STREETS AND ROADS ARE DEOJCATED TO THE PUBLIC, THIS -CLAUSE SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.) . EAsEMENT No, z: A snap OF LAND 10 FEET 1N wsant ACROSS Au LOTS, TRACTS AND oPEN SPACES L_DCATED WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING PARAU.EL TO AND COINCIDENT WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID PRIVATE AND PU8UC 81'REET8 AND ROAD RIGHT&- OF-WAY, 1, Purpoeo. Grantee lhall have the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, Improve, remove, enlarga, and use the 881efflenl area for one or more utility systems for purposes of transml11ion, distribution and · sale of gas and eladriclly. Such 1yatam may Include, but are not limited to: . · Underground focllltlae. Pipes, plpallnN, mains, taterelS, conduJtl, regulaton and feeder1 for gas; conctulta, linn, cablea, vaub. switches and transformana for eleclrlclty; ftber optk: cable and other Unol, cables and faclUliBI for communications; seml-bul1ed or ground-mounted fac:Hltiee and padl, manholes, meters, ftdures. alCachments and any and a!J other laeUitle• or • appurtenance& necessary or COl"N8fllent to any or all of the foregoing. FolklwinQ the Initial conatrudlon of aa or a portion ot ill ayttema, Grantee may, from time to tlmo. CQn!trucf such add!tlonal fadlltles • It may roquh for such ayatems. Grantee ahall haVIII the fight of aoceaa to the Easement Alea over and acrou Che Property to enable Grentoo to exardH Ill rights hereunder. Grantee ahall compensate Gtantor for any damage to Iha Properly cauNd by Iha exerclM of IUCh right of IIOCCtH by Grantee. z. Eooe,Hnt Area Clearing and Malntonance. Grantee shall have the right to QA, remove and dlspo$e or any end all bruah, tren or other vegetation In the Easement Area. Grantee shall also have the fight to cootrol, on a con11numg basil and by eny prudent and reasonablo means, Iha astabllahment and growth of brush, trees or other vegatat\on In the Eaaement Area. 3. Gnmtor'a Uoo of Eaoarnent Atoa. Onmtor reaerves the right lo use tha Easernetll Area for any · purpose not lnaJRmtent with the r$ghta herein granted. pn:widad, hOwevet, Grentor shall nal oonatrud ot maintain·. any bulldl:n;I. nuctuf91 ot other objed:a on the Easement Anta and Grantor shall do no b&altlng within 300 feet of Grantoe'a facilllles 'Mlhoul Gnlntee'a prior wriuat:' consorrt. 4. lndemnftJ. Grantoa agree:a to lndemnlff Grantor rrom and against Uabilily Incurred by Gnlntor as a result of Grantee'• neglganoe In the e.icerdA of the rlghta herein gnuitad to Grantee. but nothing herein shall require Grantee to lndeninify Grantor for thot porUon of any slK:h llabilHy attributable to lhe negflgan,;e of Grantor or the negllgence of others. RalhiMm Shoft Plat 1060M57 I 10702e183 / REOTI 62224 . Paga 1 of2 t11cr1pt1oa: K1ng,WA Docume.nt-Year • .Montb.Day.DocID 2006.1121.560 Page:. 1 or a "Cler, 2 Comment: ~· 20061121-.,:,,. 5. Abandonment 'The rights hanlln granted 1haU continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Easement AnM fol a pet1od of five {5) 1uccnslve years, In which event, this auement shaU tennlnate and all rights hereunder, and any lmprovemenla remaining In the Eatement Area, thall rever1 to or otherwt:se become the property of Gnmtor. provided, however, that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's faikle to lnltlaly ~a b 1yatems on the Euarnent Area wllhln any period of time from the dale hereof. a. SuccOMoro and ADalgnL Grantee ahall have the right to ass6gn, apportion or OlhefWlse transfof any or an of It. rights. benefltl, prtvilages and lntentsn arising In and under lhil oaaement. Without limiting the genetallty of the foregoing, the rlghte and obllgatlons of the partln shall Inure to tho benefit of and be binding upon their respecth,e SUCCIIIOIW and asalgtl1. . OATEOU,is~dayol f'<N-~ 2006, GRANTOR: :~:C STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUlflY OF t'.,,,!'f) ) On this t,.l::l-day of ·,-.t ~ be.. ..,..-, 2006, before mo, the undersigned, a Natmv Public ln and for the State of Washington, duly commlaaioned and sworn, personally appeared !',"\A.,. ~ L,.,v..,ld..£.v---· · , to me kl"ICMln to be the perl(ln(1) v.tlG signed a1 ..Pon."\.\ i..+:r::'c::: of CHARTER HOMES, INC,, the corporation that executed tho within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged uld Instrument to be ~ free and voluntary act and deed and the free and VOU'lta,y act and deed of said corporation for the usn end purpoaea !heroin mentioned; and on oalh ateled that ~ was authorized to execute tho said Instrument on behalf of said COJporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I ~ hereunto sat my hand and official aoal the day and year first a~ written. Ralhlnam Short PIIII 1050396571107029113 I REDTII 62224 Pav-2 ol2 cS;gnatureoi>O Soph; ~ A "4A~ ..._ (Print or stamp name ol Notary} NOTARY PU$UC In and for the State ot Washington, reaidlng at $,&,A-ff-tc_., {d"l !:,...._; Cj 9':):;;;: My Appoinb'Mnt Expires: I b { '7,.°' { o 8 t0criptiOD: King,WA Document-Year • .Month.D~y.~oaID 2006.1121.560 Page: 2 oE 2 -cfer I 2 C'omffle.nt : I \ NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS\,,/1 ~ DW. NO. 4 , S.W.114 of Ula S.W.1/4 of SU.TION 33 T. 23.N.R.B.E.W.M. I l"\f!:r,11by~rfl_f.)'\th11I .lhii: .. plat of \-o,.,yHw£CTlllN QUD[N1'11ACTS o,,/·~'ihtj- 1$ ba\Cdon ori acl~_~t-~~rv~y iltfld·.1.~.bd1visi~.of ~lion 3) rown,hlp fl.N.ll, · 5 t-""·~·.i Thal lh~-d,ctan~1,eour$H,~nd ;ii,:isJ.e• chown 11\af'.aon cori;:ec•I)' thet t_~J;i··~cn..,r,rJl!'I.~' ha ... ;·-~n sa1 <'lfld-10.t-.bnd block cor!b)r~ s\.11~<1 on tiji: 9rou_nd con'c~_)[y; J'n.91 l haV;t{y_Uy comp'i'~d wilh th,.e provisions of fn.0 •1•,!_~1~1' and -~.1nf'~1;1,1ulatioi'l1·.,,. . . --~ .. ·::.· ccr~t:~£1a: ~,$::it"\:"( 11 46.W,}~7 . . _{· . FitttC:h/or record ~ • ..fhR; ~st of 11'}11,' 1<i119 CO';'n1_y Planning Commissiori .,,..,i,h,s2,i day af . .-. A..~ -"" ___ ~ A.O as.a.. at .Ju:;. m,f'tutet pul _ .u .A..C!'L. an~_,_record.ed·•f!. .. _.~olv"'. A..Z-.\Of Pl1111.,p•g.e-'LL RAJcord5' of 'r<ing County •,. ..,....... ! -~·l:,"J;\--~ .... ~_ .. ,. ~.L·Jf..Jfu.;, _____ :::. Qepvr~-.,. Couri1~ Auditor ACKNOWLEOGE14ENT "\·1:11e:r.t. OF ~&S!-<\NJroi,11 • G<)UNTY 0 .. ;,c1NEi ; S.J. ~ ., .. ,,,. :/' f nis ;~ lo c,rlify lhat on lkis ·'-. d,y ot". J!l~O ,.,!'• ~ ~i".A~ ., bflore./n•, 1h1111 unde•ign•d, a notar:, p~b\ic, pr.r1on11\ p• d W'i_lJ1al'r! w. Gord~n 1101d Gl•dys F. eordon, nh w,fe, to me, l{now" to D1il the )ic,rsora wh"o oecu\od tho fort going d•dication and who oc'lrnow\tdgfd Tome tha.t.,th1tj 1\9neo and se•led lhe urne a, ttnir free ond voluntar.)' ad ao<t c1·~tl for Th• usu arid purposes here.in mentioned w,t .. ns my h•riO ""d official seal lhe day ond "1tar above wrinen. ' ______ y,._..H,...c~,~------··- ... otary 1-'ubl,c in •nd for the 'it•le of W•shin9ton ru,ding in Se.a111e D ~y,,~ ~O· • "'~si "::i» 111.oc ~---\'1, ... ~ ~of?..', , ..... ,,, s . i i-,,, ~~"'~ .,:1• I ,,. -1 1; ~~ • ' • I • *'"' :' /110\ e--1 ... ,. ... ' = = .... _, ~ • ~1-I ""'' ' I .., ' _, {'~~ ' I ; ' ; ,, ~-llll•I 1/111 .. ... "" .. ' ... ---w .. : ~1 lll<O/ ; - • -f I ~J ~ ,+J. ,.,. -l .. " ; lMUj ;_ -:~ } -.. . f. ..-:!• ' _( '"'" 'lllHf I • '"" • ,.,1,1 ,u,1 -... -111,1 "'' .... . ,·· .. ' ·•·• ... ' ' " " ' -• . $.E. 111:mD ST ' • • :--------i/"7'''"''" .............. l.l. 1112ND. ff. IIDHII WCH!Lll U ~a. 1111 • "' ,-~-11) ~ • '"" ... '" "'" t~,11 .. = " ' ,, I ,-; ICCIPt71070 7803210871 ·1 , • l ' ~i .~-; ~ 'b; ltrif ..... -~~,! ,1 ~i ! ,,, ..... "!;£ ,,~ ... ' . ;VL 20060512001281.:: . .. :. AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Charter Homes, Inc. 601 Union ST. #5100 Seattle, 'IVA98101 ·2111111111,111111 0060512001281 ~!ffl'a""gl= LID . 33 .. ee es11l1i.B: 1z: Ba ICING COW.TY, 11A · .. Ried for Record at Request of: ., ~ "N • • •,. F/,st Amerfcan TIIIB ~ .. :Insurance Company First American lltle Insurance Company STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED . FIie No: 4204-495502 (CMN) Date: May 10, 2006 Grantor(s): PraclEiep Rathlnam and Sharmlla Pradeep Rathinam Grantee(s): Charter Homes, Inc. Abbreviated Legal: Tract II, Block 1, Northwestern Garden Tracts Div, 4, Vol. 47, P, 74. Additional Legal on page: Assessor's Tax Parcel No(s): 619840·0180-o3 THE GRANTOR(S) Pradeep Rathlnam. and Sharmlla Pradeep Rathlnam, husband and wife for and In consideration of Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration, in hand paid, conveys, and warrants to Charter Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation, the following described real estate, situated In the County of King, state of Washington. . . . . . Tract 9, Bloc:k 1, ll!orl:hwestem Garden Tracts Division No. 4, ll()COrdlng tD the Plat thereof recorded In. Volume 47 of Plats, Page(s) 74, In King County, Washington. Subject To: This conveyance Is subject to covenants, conditions, restrlctlons ·and easements, If any, affecting title, which may appear In the public record, lndudlng those shown on any recorded plat or survey. E2206336. OSIIZIZODB tz:sa KING COUNTY 11A TAX 11z:a•1.ee SALE sne,eea.ee Page 1 of2 PACEOII OF Oil 1scr1pt1on: Klng~WA Doo~ent-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1281 Page: l of ·2 :-der: 2 comment: . LP8 10-05 . ' APN: 619840-018D-03 Pradeep Rathinam STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF King Sllltuto,y Worranty Deed -continued 20060512001281.(•i. Fie No.: 4204-495502 (CMN) . Date: 05/10/2006 Sharmlla Pradeep Rathinam ) )-ss ) Page 2 of 2 LPB 10-05 tsaription: Xing,WA Docurae.nt-Year . .Hontb.Day.DocID 2006.512.1281 Page: 2 ot 2 ~er: 2 Couune.nt: \ (!_}.r4fc1t. f/o,.._~[ /IC. WR 6.J</, (pol (,),,,.," S,f. -ti 5/W 3,cg,,t/k CJ II ff /Of / This Space Provided for Recorder's Use When Recorded Return to: DEED Oil' 'fRUST Grmnor(s): Charter Homes, Inc.· (With Puturc Advance Clause) Grantec(s): Washington First International Ban1c Legal Description: Tract 9, Block I, Northwestern Garden Tracts Div. 4, Vol. 47, P. 74. Aasessor'.a Propeny Tax Parcel or ACCOUDI Number: 619840-0180-03 Reference Numbers or Documents Assigned or Released: 20060512001282.:: DATE AND PARTll!S. The date of this Deed OfTNSt (Security lnstrumenl) Is May JO, 2006. Tbc parties and their addresses are: 'f /t// GBANJ'OR: . CIIAllTER HOMES, INC, A Washington Corporation 601 Union Street, Suite 3920 Scatlle, Washington 98101 TllUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN f'1SS0,2 1111ST AMERICAN Tl'J1.E INSURANCE COMPANY a Washington Corporation 2101 Founh Avenue, Suite 800 ScaUle, Wasblngton 98121 LENDER:. WASHINGTON rnlST lNTEllNATIONAL BANK Qrsanizcd and existing under the laws of Washington 9709 Third Ave. N.B. ScaUle, Washington 98115 &ncr Homu. lllc. WuHnp:,a Dcied Of Trad WA/4XXXXXLMl..00937J0000SIII015050806Y ,acription: K1ng,WA Docwnen:t-Year.~nth.Day.DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: lo~ 9· ~er: Z Comment: · .. ct.· ... I. CONVEYANCE. For good and valuable con,idcration, tho receipt and sufficiency or wbicb. is acknowledged, and to secure the Secured DebU and Grantor's performance under Ibis Security Jnstnunent. Clralllor imvocably grants, conveys and sells to Trustee, in trust for lhc benefit.of Lender, with power or sale, the following described property: Tract 9, Block I, Nortbweslem Garden TractJ Division No. 4, according to the Plat thereof n:corded in Volwno 47 of Plats, Page(s) 74, In King County, Washington. The property is located in King County at 11634 SB 192nd Street, Renton. Washington 98058. Together with all rights, easements, appune.nances, roysllies, mineral rights, oil and gas rights, crops, timber, all diversion payments or third party paymenra made to crop producers and all existing and future improvements, structwea, fixtures, and replacements that may now, or at any lime in the furure, be part of tho real estate described (all rerem,d to as Property). 'Ibis Security lnstrwnent will remain in effect Wllil the Secured Debts and all underlying agreements have been terminaied in writing by Lender. 2. MAXIMUM OBUGATION LIMIT. The total principal amount secured by this Security Instrument at any one time will not exceed $1,275,000.00. This UmllBlion of amount does not include interest and other tee., and charges validly made pursuant to this Security Instrwnent. Also, this limitation does not apply to advances made under the terma of this Security lnslrument to protect Lender's security and .to perform any or lhe COVCllallts contained in Ibis Security Instrument. 3. SECllRl!D DEBTS. The 1erm 'Secured Debts' includes and Ibis Security Instrument will secure oacb or !he following: · · A. Spodflc DoblB. The following debts and all extenslons, renewals, retlnancings, modifications and replacerriems. A promissory note or other agreement, No. 8085750002, dated May 10, 2006. from Orantor to Lender, with a loan amount or $1,275,000.00. One or more of the debts secured by !his Security lmtrument contains a fu1ure advance provision. B. Swus Advanced. All sums advanced and expenses incurred by Lender under the terms of this Security Instrument. 4. PAYMl!NTS. Grantor as,eea that all payments under the Secured Debts will be paid when due and in accordance with.the terma oflhe Secured Debts and this Security Instrument. 5. W ABllANTY OF TITLE. Grantor warrants ti,,;1 Grantor is or will be lawfu11y seized or the estate conveyed by this Security lnstrumCJU and has the right to im,vocably grant, convey and sell the Prope11y to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale. Grantor also warrants that the Property· is unencumbered, except for encwnbraocca or reoord. · 6. P!llOR. Sl!CUR.ll'Y JNTERJ!STS. With regard to any other mortgage, deed of trust, security agreement or other lien docrnuent that created a prior security interest or encumbrance on the Property, Grantor agrees: · A, To make all payments when due and to perform or comply with all covenants. B. To pnimptly deli-to Lender any notices that Grantor receives from the bolder. C, Not to allow any modification or extension or, nor to reque.,t any future advances under any note or agreement secured by the lien document without Lender's prior written consODt. 7. CLAIMS AGAINST TinJ!. Orantor will pay all taxes. assessments, liens, encumbrances, lease payments,. ground r,,nts, Ulilities, and other cbarges relating to the Property when due. Lender may require Granter to provide to Lender copies or all notices that such amounts are dne and !he receipla evidencing Grantor's payment. Grantor will defend title to the Property against any claims that would impair the lien of this Securily Instnunoat. Orantor agrees to assign to Lender, as requested by Lender, any rigbts, clalma or defenses Grantor may have against parties who supply labor or materials to maintain or Improve the Property. . •t"6Dmen.,._,..._,St."""'1,MN ~ tacr1.Pt1on: K1ng,W'A Document-Year.Montb.~ay.DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: 2 of 9 ·der: 2 co.mment: . --· 2006051 ~UV ! J'l,2. ·=··=· 8. DUE ON SALE OR ENCUMBRANCE. Lender may, at its option, declare the entire balance of the Secured Debt to be immediately due and payable upon the creation of, or contract for the creation of, any lien, encumbrance, tramfer or sale of all or any pan of the Propeny. This right is sobject to the restrictions imposed by federal law (12 C.F.R. 591), as applicable. . 9, TRANSFER OF AN INTEREST IN 1BE GRANTOIL If Grantor is an entity other than a narural person (such as a corporation or other organization), Lender may demand immediate payment if: A, A beneftclal interest in Grantor is sold or tran.sferred. B, There is a cbange in either the identity or number of members of a partnership or similar entity. C. There is a cbange in ownership of more than 25 percent of the voting stock of a corporation or similar entity. However, Lender may not demand payment In the above situations if it is prohibited by law as of the date of this Security Instrument. 10. WAllllANTD!:8 AND REPRESENTATIONS. Grantor makes to Lender the following warranties and representations which will continue as long as this Security Instrument is in effect: A. l'llwer. Grantor is duly organized, and validly existing and in good standing in all jurisdictions in which Grantor operates. Grantor has the power and authority to enter into this transaction and to carry on Grantor's business or activity as it is now being conducted and, as applicable, is qualified to do so In each jurisdiction in which Grantor operates. B. Authority. The execution, delivery and performance of this Security lnstrUDlent and the obligation evidenced by this Security Instrument are within Grantor's powers, have been duly authorized, have r=ived all necessary governmental approval, will not violate any provision of law, or order of court or governmental agency, and will not violate any agreement to which Grantor is a pany or to which Grantor is or any of Grantor's propeny is subject. · C. Name and Place or Business. Other than previously disclosed in writing to Lender, Grantor has not cbangod Grantor's name or principal place of business within the last 10 years and has not used any other trade or fictitious name. Without Lender's prior wriuen coment, Grantor docs not and will not use any other name and wlll preserve Grantor's existing name, trade names and franchises. 11, PROPERTY CONDmoN, ALTERATIONS AND INSPECTION. Grantor will keep the Propony in good condition and make all repairs that are reasonably necessary. Grantor will not commit or allow any waste, impainnent, or deterioration of the Propeny. Grantor will keep the Propeny free of DOXious weeds and grasses. Grantor agrees that the nature of the occupancy and use will not substantially change without Lender's prior written consent. Grantor will not permit any change In any license, restrictive covenant or easement without Lender's prior written consent. Grantor will notify Lender of all demands, proceedlag,,, claims, and actions ag,,inst Grantor, and of any loss or damage to tho Property. No portion of the Propeny will be removed, demolished or materially altered without Lender's prior written consent except that Grantor has the right to remove items of personal propeny comprising a pan of the Propeny that become worn or obsolete, provided that such personal property is replaced with Olher personal propeny at least equal in value to the replacod personal propeny, free from any title retention device, security agreement or other encumbrance. Such replacement of personal propeny will be deemed subject to the security interest created by this Security Instrument. Grantor will not partition or subdivide the Property without Lender's prior written consent. Lender or Lender's agents may, at Lender's option, enter tho Propeny at any reasonable time for the purpose of inspecting the Propeny, Lender will give Grantor notice at the time of or before an inspection specifying a reasonable purpose for the inspection. Any inspection of the Propeny will be entirely for Lender's benefit and Orantor will in no way rely on Lender's inspection. U. AUTHORITY TO PERFORM. If Grantor falls to perform any duty or any of the covenants contained in this Security Instrument, Lender may, without notice, perform or cause them to be performed. Grantor Chamr Homes, hie. Wubiqtoa Deed Of'frml WA14XXXXX1.ML009371000051BI01S050806Y Description: King,WA.Document-Year.Month.Day,DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: 3 of 9 Order: 2 Comment: ----,,0060S·14'.W"l4'.0"'·-- appoints Lender as attorney in fact to sign Grantor's name or pay any amoun1 necessary for performance. Lender's right to perform for Grantor will not create an obligation to perform, and Lender's failure to perform will not preclude Lender from exercising any of Lender's other rights under the law or this Security Instrument. If any construction on the Property is discontinued or not carried on in a reasonable manner, Lender may take all steps necessary to protect Lender', security interest in the Property, including completion of the coostruction. lJ, DEFAULT. Grantor will be in default if any of the following occur: A. Payments. Grantor fails to make a payment in full when due. B. Insolvency or Bankruptcy. The death. dissolution or insolvency of, appointment of a receiver by or on bebalf of. application of any debtor relief law. the assigmncnt for the benefit of creditors by or on behalf of, the voluntary or involuntary termination or existence by, or the commencement of any proceeding under any present or future federal or state insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, composition or debtor relief law by or against Grantor, Borrower, or any co-signer, endorser, surety or guaranror o.f this Secnrlty Instrument or any other obligations Borrower bas with Lender. C. Business Termfnalloo. Grantor merges, dissolves, reorganizes, ends its busines., or existence, or a partner or majority owner dies or is declared legally incompetent. D. Fallun, lo Perrorm. Grantor fails to perform any condition or to keep any promise or covenant of this Security Instrwnent. E. Other Documents. A default occurs under the terms of any other document relating to the Secured Debts. F, Other Agreemenla. Grantor is in default on any other debt or agreement Grantor bas with Lender. G, Mlsrepn,sentallon. Grantor makes any verbal or written statement or provides any fmancial information that is untrue, inaccurate, or conceals a material fact at the time it is made or provided. H. Judjpnent, Grantor fails to satisfy or appeal any judgment against Grantor. L Forfeiture. The Property is used in a manner or for a purpose that threatens confiscation by a legal authority. J. Name Change. Granter changes Grantor's name or assumes an additional name without ootifying Lender before making such a change. IL Property Transfer. Grantor transfers all or a substantial part of Grantor's money or property. This condition of default, as it relates to the transfer of the Property, is subject to the restrictions contained in the DUB ON SALE section. L. PtopeJty Value. Lender determines in good faith that the value of the Property has declined or is Impaired. M. Material etumae. Without first notifying Lender. there j5 a material change in Orantor' s business, including ownership, management, and financial conditiom. N. Insecurity. Lender determines In good faith that a material adverse change has occurred ln Grantor's fmancial condition from the conditioDB set forth In GranJor' s most recent financial statement before the date of this Security Instrument or that the prospect for payment or performanoe of the Secured Debts is Impaired for any reason. 14. REMEDIES. On or· after default, Lender may use any and all remedies Lender has under state or federal law or In any document relating to the Secured Debts. Any amounta advanced on Grantor's behalf will be inunediately due and may be added to the balance owing under the Secured Debts. Lender may make a claim for any and all Insurance benefits or refunds that may be available on Grantor's defau!L Subject to any right to cure, required time schedules or any other notice rtgbts Grantor may have under federal and state law, Lender may make all or any part of the amount owing by the terms of the Secured Debts inunedlately due and foreclose this Security Instrument in a manner provided by law upon the occurrence of a default or anytime thereafter. °""" -""· Wublngton Deed Of'Trmt WAJ4XXXXX1..ML0093710000Sl8801S050&06Y OJ996 Buinr1 Systema. lDo,, SL Ooud, MN ~ Description: Kfng,WA Document•Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: 4 oE 9 Order: 2 CoJM1ent: .--------·---·--------------------------------- 200605 1200 ! 21l2. ·=··-· · All remedies are distinct, cumulative and not exclusive, and the Lender is entitled to all remedies provided at law or equity, whether or not expressly set forth. The acceptance by Lender of any sum In payment or partial payment on the Secured Debts after the balance is due or is accelerated or after foreclosure proceedings are filed will not constitute a waiver of Lender's right to require full and complete cure of any existing default. By not exercising any remedy, Lender does not .waive Lender's right to later consider the event a default if it continues or happens again. 15. COLLECTION EXPENSES AND ATl'ORNEYS' FEES. On or after Defaul~ to lhe extent permitted by law, Orantor agrees to pay all expenses of collection, enforcement or protection of Lender's rights and remedies nnder this Security Instrument or any other document relating to the Secured Debts. Grantor agrees to pay expenses for Lender to Inspect and preserve the Property and for any recordation costs of releasing the Property from this Security Inscrument. Expenses Include, but are not limited to, attorneys' fees. court costs and other legal expenses. These expenses are due and payable immediately. Jfnot paid immediately, these expenses will bear interest from the date of payment until paid in full at the blghest interest rate In effect as provided for In the terms of the Secured Debts. In addition. to the extent pennitted by the United Stat<:s Bankruptcy Code, Grantor agrees to pay tho reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Lender to protect Lender's rlghts and Interests In coanectlon wllh any bankruptcy proceedings Initiated by or against Grantor. 16. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES. Ali used in this section. (1) Environmental Law means, without llntltation, lhe Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA. 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), aU other federal, stat<: and local laws, regulations. ordinances, court orders, attorney general opinions or interpretive letters concerning lhe public health. safety, welfare, environment or a hazardous substance; and (2) Hazardous Substance means any toxic, radioactive or hazardous material, waste, pollutant or contaminaut which has characteristics which render the substance dangerous or potentially dangerous to the public health, safety, welfare or environment. The tenn Includes. without limitation, any substances defined as 'hazardous material,' "toxic substanoe, • "hazardous waste,' "hazardous substance," or "regulated substance" under any Envlronmeutal Law. Grantor represent.s, warrants and agrees that: A. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged In writing to Lender, no Hazardous Substance has been, i,, or will be located, transported, manufactured, treated, refined. or handled by any person on, under or about the Property. except in the ordinary course of business and in strict compliance with all applicable Environmental Law. B. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, Grantor has not and will not cause, contribute to, or pennit the relCllliC of any Hazardous Substance on the Property. C. Grantor will immediately notify Lender if(!) a release or threatened release of Hazardous Substance occurs on, under or about the Property or migrat<:s or threatens to tolgrat<: from nearby property; or (2) there is a violation of any Environmental Law concerning tbe Property. In such an event, Grantor will take all necessary remedial action in accordance with Environmental Law. D. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, Grantor has no knowledge of or reason to believe there is any pending or threatened investigation, claim, or proceeding of any kind relating to (I) any Hazardous Substance locat<:d on. under or about the Property; or (2) any violation by Grantor or any tenant of any Environmental Law. Grantor will immediately notify Lender in writing as soon as Grantor has reason to believe there Is any such pending or threat<:ned investigation, claim, or proceeding. In such an event, Lender has lhe right, but not the obligation, to participate In any such proceeding Including the right to receive copies of any documents relating to such proceedings. E. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, Grantor and every 1<:nant have been, are and will remain In full compliance with any applicable Environmental Law. F. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged In writing to Lender, there are no underground storage t.ank>, privat<: dumps or open wella locat<:d on or under the Property and no such tank, dump or well will be added unless Lender first consents in writing. Description: King,WA Docwnent-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006,512,1282 Page: 5 oL 9 Order: 2 Comment: 2006051 ~w·t "L.~L ·.-.·· G. Grantor will regularly inspect the Property, monitor the activities and operatioos on the Property, and conflrlll that all permits, licenses or approvals required by any applicable Environmental Law arc obtained and complied with. H, Grantor will pennit, or cause any tenant to ponnit, Lender or Lender's agent to enter and inspect the Property and review all records at any reasonable time 10 determine (1) the existence, location and nature of any Hazardous Substance on, under or about tho Property; (2) the oxistcnco, location, natllrC, and magnitude of any Hazardous Substance that has been released on, under or about the Property; or (3) whether or not Grantor and any tenant are in compliance with applicable Environmental Law. L Upon Lender's request and at any time, Grantor agrees, at Grantor's expense, to engage a qualified environmental engineer to prepare an environmental audit of the Property and to submit the results of such audit to Lender. The choice of the environmental engineer who will perform such audit is subject to Lender's approval. J. Lender has the right, but not the obligation, to perform any of Grantor's obligations under tbb section al Orantor' s expense. X. As a consequence of any breach of any representation, warranty or promlse made in tbb section, (1) Orantor will indemnify and hold Lender and Lender's successors or assigns harmless from and agsinst all losses, claims, demands, liabilities, damages, cleanup, response and remediation costs, penalties and expenses, including without limitation all costs of litigation and attorneys' fees, which Lender and Lender's successors or assigns may sustain; and (2) at Lender's discretion,. Lender may release tbb Security Instrument and in return Orantor will provide Lender with collateral of at least equal value 10 the Property without prejudice to any of Lender's rights under this Security Instrument. L. Notwithstanding any of the language contained in tbb Security Instrument to the contrary, the terms of tbb section will survive any foreclosure or satisfaction of this Security Instrument regardless of any passage of tille lo Lender or any disposillon by Lender of any or all of the Property. Any claims and defenses to the contrary are hereby waived. 17. CONDEMNATION. Orantor will give Lender prompt notice of any pending or threatened action by private or public entities to purchase or take any or all of the Property through condemnation, eminent domain, or any other means. Grantor authorizes Lender to intervene in Grantor's name in any of the above described actions or claims. Orantor assigns to Lender the proceeds of any award or claim for damages connected with a condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property. Such proceeds will be considered payments and will be applied as provided in this Security Instrument. This assignment of proceeds is subject to the terms of any prior mortgage, deed of trust, security agreement or other lien document. 18. INSUllANCE. Orantor agRco to keep the Property insured against the risks reasonably a.ssoclaled with the Property. Orantor will maintain this insurance in the amounts Lender requires. This ins\lrance will last unW the Property is released from this Security Instrument. What Lender requires pursuant to the preceding two sentences can change during the term of the Secured Debts. Orantor may choose the insurance company, subject to Lender's approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld. AU insurance policies and renewals will include a standard •mortgage clause" and, where applicable, "loss payee clause." If required by Lender, Orantor agrees 10 maintain comprehensive general liability insurance and rental loss or business interruption insurance in amounts and under policies acceptable to Lender. The comprehensive general llability insurance must name Lender as an additional insured. The rental loss or business interruption insurance must be in an amount equal to at least coverage of one year's debt service, and required escrow account deposits (if agreed to separately in writing). Orantor will give Lender and the insurance company immediate notice of any loss. All insurance proceeds will be applied 10 restoration or repair of the Property or 10 the Secured Debts, at Lender's option. If Leader acquires the Property in damaged condition, Grantor's righl8 to any insurance policies and proceeds will pass 10 Lender to the extent of tho Secured Debts. Charter Home,, Inc. w.......,. Dood orn... WAJ4XXXXJCLM1..009371000011&801SOS0806Y CIJ!i196 Banke,1 Symnu, bx:., St. Cloud, MN ~ Description: King,WA Docwnent-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: 6 of 9 Order: 2 Comment: 2008091~uv,232.:: Orantor will immediately notify Lender of cancellation or termination of insurance. If Granto< fails to keep the Property insured, Lender may obtain insurance to protect Lender's inte= in the Property and Grantor will pay for the insurance on Lender's demand. Lender may demand that Grantor pay for the insurance all at once, or Lender may add the insurance premiums to the balance of the Secured Debts and charge interest on It at the rate that applies to the Secured Debts. This insurance may include coverages not originally required of Grantor, may be written by a company other than one Grantor wOllld choose, and may be written at a higher rate than Grantor could obtain lf Grantor purchased the insurance. Grantor acknowledges and agrees that Lender or one of Lender's affiliates may receive commissions on the purchase of this insurance. 19. ESCROW FOR TAXES AND lNSURANCE. Orantor will not be required to pay to Lender funds for taxes and insurance In escrow. 20. CO.SIGNERS. If Grantor signs this Security Instrument but is oot otherwise obligated to pay the Secured Debts, Grantor does so only to convey Grantor's interest in the Property to secure payment of the Secured Debts and Granto< does not agree by signing this Security Instrument to be personally Hable on the Secured Debts. If this Security Instrument secun:a a guaranty between Lender and Grantor, Grantor agrees to waive any rights that may prevent Lender from bringing any action or claim against Grantor or any party indebted under the obligation. These rights may include, but are not limited to, any anti-deficiency or one- acdon laws. 21. SUC~R TRUSTEE. Lender, at Lender's option, may from time to time remove Trustee and appoint a successor without any other formality than the designation in writing. The successor trustee, without conveyance of the Property, will succeed to all the title, power and duties conferred upon Trustee by this Security Instrument and applicable law. 22, USE OF PROPERTY, The real property conveyed by this Security Instrument is not used principally for agricultural purposes. 23. CONSTRUCTION WAN, This Security Instrument secures an obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement on the Property. 24, APPLICABLE LAW. This Security Instrument is governed by the laws of Washington, the United States of America, and to the exten1 required, by the laws of the jurisdiction where the Property is located, except to the extent such state laws are preempted by federal law. 25. JOINr AND INDIVIDUAL LIA1IILD'Y AND SUCCl!'BSORS. Each Grantor's obligations under this Security Instnunent are independent of the obligations of any other Gran tor. Lender may sue each Grantor individually or together with any other Grantor. Lender may release any part of the Property and Grantor will still be obligated under this Security Instrument for the remaining Property. Grantor agrees that Lender and any party to this Security Jnstrument may extend, modify or make any change in the terms or this Security Instrument or any evidence of debt without Grantor's consent. Such a change will not release Grantor from the terms of this Security Instrument. The duties and benefits of this Security Instrument will bind and benefit the successors and assigns of Lender and Gran1or. 26. AMENDMENT, INTEGRATION AND SEVERABILITY, This Security lmtrument may not be amended or modified by oral agreement. No amendment or modification of this Security lns!rument is effective unless made in writing and excculed by Orantor and Lender. This Security Instrument and any other documents relating to the Secured Debts are the complete and final expression of the agreemODI. If any provision of this Security Instrument is unenforceable, then the unenforceable provision will be severed and the remaining provisions will still be enforceable. 27, INTERPRETATION, Whenever used, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. The section headings are for convenience only and arc oot to be used to interpret or define tbc terms of this Security Instrument. 28. NOTICE, FINANCIAL REPORTS, ADDmONAL DOCUMENTS AND RECORDING TAXES. Unless otherwise required by law, any notice will be given by delivering it or mailing it by both first class ChanlCr Home., I,m., Wuhlq:IOll Deed CX Tnul WA/4XXXXXLML00937t0000S1880I50S0806Y Description: K1ng,WA Docwnent•Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1282 Page: 1 of 9 Order: 2 Comment: and either registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the appropriate party's address listed in the DATE AND PARTIES section, or tq any other address designated in writing. Notice to one Grantor will be deemed to be notice to all Orantors. Grantor will iofonn Lender In writing of any change in Grantor's name, address or other application infonnation. Grantor will provide Lender any financial statements or infonnation Lender requests. All financial statemcttts and infonnation Grantor gives Lender will be correct and complete. Grsruor agrees to pay all expenses, charges and taxes in cooncction with lhc preparation and recordmg of this Security Instrument. Grantor agrees to sign, deliver, and file any additional documents or certificadons that Lender may consider necessary to perfect, continue, and preserve Grantor's obligations under this Security Instrument and to confirm Lcudcr' s lien status on any Property, and Grantor agrees to pay all expenses, charges and taxes in connection with the preparation and recordmg thereof. Time ls of the essence. SIGNA 11JJIES, By signing, Grantor agrees to the tcnns and covcnanta contained · in this Security Instrument. Grantor aJao acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Security lnstrUment. GllANTOR: ~:~~. Mai . ~. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. (BusJneso or Entity) A :Jt,e,,uditN<-+ oF vww /kra. oF "· I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark F. Ludden, ,,.E the perso~ who appeared before me, and said person<,( acknowledged that ~sltellhey signed this instrument, on oath stated that Ai'•bc,<lhey ~ofued to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of Chatter Homes, Inc.lo· be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purpoocs mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ,Y//-&t:, ctm,,r-tn,. Wllhlllatoa Deed OfTnm WN4XXXXX1.ML009371000031880150508015Y ,acr.:lpt.to.n: JC.tng, H'A Document-Year,Montb_.D•Y•DocID 2006. 512-.1482 Page: B of· 9 :oder: 2 CommGDt: • REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE (Not to be completed until paid in full) TO TRUSTEE: 2D0aut11\ 206 j L1=i2 .. : .. :. The undersigned is the holder of the note or notes secured by this Security Instrument. Said note or notes, together with all other indebtedness secured by this Security Instrument, have been paid in full. You are hereby directed to caru:c:I this Security IMrwnent, which is delivered hereby, and to reconvey, without warranty, all the estate now held by you under this Security Instrument to the person or persons legally entitled thereto . .......................................................... (Authorized Lender Signature) Charier llomu, . Wasbington Deed or Trllllt WA/4XXXXXLML00937100005188015050806Y (Date) 01996 Bante11 Sysems, Inc., SI, Cloud, MN ~ b ~ ID 2006.512,1282 Page: 9 of 9 Description: King,WA Docwnent•Year.Mont .Day.wvC order: 2 Comment: CAu_feJ(_ /lo,..6 J,,,c. UIICo~/- fu /j ( /).,r ,',,,.. J. i. -,:f 51 ()(> 20060512001283.:: Je.0.:tffe/wA 'lf/6( ,· IIIIIIIHIIIIIII '20060512001283 FIRST AIIIRICAN ASNR 41.18 :e,t1,~g: Tl~ea KiNG COUNTY, 11A This Space Provided for Recorder's Use When Recorded Return to: ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND REN'll'S (With Pu!ure Advance Clause) Assigoor(s): Charter Homes, Inc. Lender(s): Washington First Joternational Bank Legal Description: Tract 9, Block 1, Northwestern Garden Tracts Div. 4, Vot 47, P. 74. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel or Account Number: 619840-0180--03 Reference Numben Of Doeumeots Assigned or Released: FIRST AMERICAN DATE AND PAJlTIES. The date of this Asslgnmeot of Lease! and Rents (Assigmncnl) is May JO, 2006. Tho parties and their addresses are: AllSIGNOll: CBAII.TEJl DOMES, INC. A WasbiDgton Corporation 601 Union Street, Suite 3920 Seattle, Washington 98101 LENDER: WASHINGTON FlRST INTl!RNATIONAL BANK Organized and oxis1ing UDdcr the laws of Washington 9709 Third Ave. N.E. Seattle, Washington 9811S 1. IIIAXIM1JM OBLIGATION LJMrr. The totsJ principal amount secured by this Assigmneot at any ooc tlmc will not exceed $1,275,000.00. This limitation of amount does not include interest and other fees and cbarge.t validly made pursuan1 to this Assignment. Also, this limitation does not apply to adVances made under the term& of .this Assignmeot to protect Lender's security and to perform any or tho covenanl& contained ln this Assignment. • · 2. SECURED DEB'l'S. The term 'Secured Debts' includes and this Assignmeot will secure each of tho· following: C.U.Homol,lao. Wablrialon AalprDmt Df'--IIDd ltt.mt WAHXXXXXI.MLOOD371000051B801'°'°806Y •19915 Banter. System1, lac., Sc. Coud, MN.~ . . •scr1pt!on: IC!ng,WA Document-Year.llontb."Day.DocID 2006.S12.l283 Page: l of 10 'Cler: 2 Comment: 2006061200121.1-,. ije",. A. Spedftc Debts. The following debts and all extensions, renewals, refinancings, modifications and replacements. A promissory note or other agrccmcnt, No. 8085750002, dated May 10, 2006. from Assignor to Lender, with a loan amOWlt of $1,275,000.00. Oru, or more of the debts secured by this Assignment contains a future advance provision. B. Sums Alhanced. All S\DilS advanced and_ expenses incurred by Lender under the terms of this Assignment. 3. ABSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which Is acknowledged, and to secure the Secured Debts and Assignor's performance under this Assignment, Assignor assigns, bargains, grants and conveys to Lender as additional security all the right, title and interest in the following (Property). A. Existing or future leases, subleases, licenses, guaranties and any other written or verllal agreements for the nse and occupancy of the Property, including but not limited to any extensions, renewals, modifications or replacements (Leases). B. Rents, issues and profits, including but not limited to security deposits, minimum rents, percentage rents, additional rents, corrunon ares mainteuance charges, parking charges, real estate taxes, other applicable taxes, insurance premiwn contributions, liquidated damages following default, cancellation premiums, "loss of rents" insurance. guest receipts, revenues, royalties, proceeds, bonuses, accounts, contract rights, general intangibles, and all rights and claims which Assignor may have regarding the Property (Rents). C. The term Property as nsed in this Assignment shall include the following described real property: Tract 9, Block I, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 4, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 47 of Plats, Page(s) 74, in King County, Washington. The property is located in King County at 11634 SE 192nd Street, Renton, Washington 98058. In the event any item listed as Leases or Rents is determined to be personal property, this Assignment will also be regarded as a security agreement. 4. PAYMENTS. Assignor agrees that all payments under the Secured Debts will be paid when due and in accordance with the terms of the Secured Debts and this Assignment. 5. COILECTION OF RENTS. Assignor may collect, receive, enjoy and use the Rents so long as Asaignor i• not in default. Assignor will not collect in advance any Rents due in future lease periods, uriless Assignor first obtains Lender's written consent. Upon default, Assignor will receive any Rents in trust for Lender and Assignor will not commingle the Rents with any other funds. Assignor agrees that this Assignment is immediately effective between Assignor and Lender and effective as to third parties on the recording of this Assignment. This Assignment will remain effective during any statutory redemption period until the Secured Debts are aatisfied. When the Propeny is not farm land or the homestead of Assignor or Assignor's successor in interest. Assignor agrees that Lender is entitled to notify Assignor or Assignor's tenants to make payments of Rents due or to become due directly to Lender after such recording, however Lender agrees not to notify Assignor's tenants until Assignor defaults and Lender notifies Assignor of the default and demands that Assignor and Assignor's tenants pay all Rents due or to become due directly to Lender. Assignor consents to Assignor's tenants paying all Rents due or to become due directly to Lender after Lender makes this notification and demand to Assignor. When the Property is farm land or the homestead of Assignor or Assignor's successor in interest, Lender may not enforce this Assignment by taking possession of the Property for the purpose of collecting Rents, but Lender may seek the appointment of a receiver to take Charter Homes, Inc. Wa~ A..r,tm&ad ott.t:ae. udltmtl WA/4XXXXXI.Mt.0®37i0000Sl88015050806Y Description: King,WA Document~Year.Hontb.Day.DocID 2006.512,1283 Page: 2 of 10 Order: 2 Conunent: i 200605120012l:I-V·:• charge of the Property, collect the Rents for non-homestead Property, and apply the RCDIS under this Assignment. 6. COLLECTION EXPENSl!S AND ATl'ORNEYS' FEES. On or after Default, to the extent permitted by law, Assignor agrees to pay all expenses of collection, enforcement or protection of Lender's rights and remedies under this Assignment or any other document relating to the Secured Debts. Assignor agrees to pay expenses for Lender to inspect and preserve the Property and for any recordation costs of releasing the Property from this Assignment. Expenses include, but are not limited to, attorneys' fees, court costs and other legal expenses. These expenses are due and payable immediately. If not paid immediately, these expenses will bear Interest from the date of payment until paid In full at the highest interest rate in effect as provided for in the terms of the Secured Debts. In addition, to the extent permitted by the United Srates Bankruptcy Code, Assignor agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Lender to protect Lender's rights and Interests in connection with any bankruptcy proceedings inltlated by or against Assignor. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES. As used in this section, (!) Environmental Law means, without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA. 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), all other federal, state and local laws, regulations, ordinances, court orders, attorney general opinions or interpretive letters concerning the public health, safety, welfare, environment or a hazardous substance; and (2) Hazardous Substance means any toxic, radioactive or hazardous material, waste. pollutant or contaminant which bas characteristics which render the substance dangerous or potentially dangerous to the public health, safety, welfare or environment. Toe term includes, without limiiation, any substances defmed as "hazardous material," "toxic substance," "hazardous waste," "hazardous substance," or •regulated substance" wuier any Environmental Law. Assignor represents, warrants and agrees that: A. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, no Hazardous Substance has beeo, is, or will be located, transported, manufactured, treated, refined, or handled by any peraon on, under or about the Property, except in the ordinary course of business and in strict compliance with all applicable Environmental Law. · B. Except aa previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, Assignor has not and will not cause, contribute to, or permit the release of any Hu.ardous Substance on the Property. C. Assignor will Immediately notify Lender if (1) a release or threatened release of Hazardous Substance occurs on, under or about the Property or migrates or threatens ro migrate from nearby property; or (2) there is a violation of any Environmental Law concerning the Property. In such an event, Assignor will take all necessary remedial action in accordance with Environmenral Law. D. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged In writing to Lender, Assignor has no knowledge of or reason to believe there is any pending or threatened investigation, claim, or proceeding of any kind relating to (I) any Hazardous Substance located on, under or about the Propeny; or (2) any violation by Assignor or any tenant of any Environmental Law. Assignor will immediately notify Lender in writing as soon as Assignor has reason to believe thero is any such pending or threatened investigation, claim, or proceeding. In such an event, Lender has the right, but not the obligation, to participate in any such proceeding including the right to receive copies of any documenta relating to such proceedings. E. Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, Assignor and every tenant have been, are and will remain in full compliance with any applicable Environmental Law. F, Except as previously disclosed and acknowledged in writing to Lender, there are no underground storage tanks, private dumps or open wells located on or under the Property and no such tank, dump or well will be added unless Lender first CODSCDts in writing. G. Assignor will regularly inspect the Property, monltor the activities and operations on the Property, and confirm that all permits, licenses or approvals required by any applicable Environmental Law are obtained and complied with. H. Assignor will'pennlt, or cause any tenant to permit, Lender or Lender's agent to enter and inspect the ~l~::::::rds at any reasonable time to determine (I) the existence, location:. n~ WA/4XXXXXLML0093710000'18IOU050"'6Y •1996 """"n .,....., 1..._, SO, Cloud, MN -( ' Description: Xing,WA Docwnent-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1283 Page: 3 of 10 Order: 2 comment: 20060512001283.:: or any H81.ardous Substance on, under or about the Property; (2) the existence, location, nature, and magnitude of any Hazardous Substance that has been released on, under or about the Property; or (3) whether or not Assignor and any tenant are in compliance with applicable Environmental Law. L Upon Lender's request and at any time, Assignor agrees, at Assignor's expense, to engage a qualified enviromnental engineer to prepare an enviromnental audit of the Property and to submit the results of such audit to Lender. The choice of the environmental engineer who will perform such audit Is subject to Lender's approval. 1. Lender hM the right, but oot the obligation, to perform any of Assignor's obligations under this section at Assignor's expense. K. As a cooscqueoce of any breaclJ of any representation, warranty or promise made in this section, (1) Assignor will indemnify and hold Lender and Lender's successors or assigns harmleas from and against all losses, claims, demands, liabilities, damages, cleanup, response and remediation costs, penalties and expenses, including without limitation all costs of litigation and attorneys' fees, which Lender and Lender's successors or assigns may sustain; and (2) at Lender's discretion, Lender may release this Assignment and ln return Assignor will provide Lender with collateral of at least equal value to the Property without prejudice to any of Lender's rights under this Assignment. L. Notwithstanding any of the language contained in this Assignment to the contrary, the terms of this scc~ion will survive any foreclosure or satisfaction of this Assignment regardless of any passage of title to Lender or any disposition by Lender of any or all of the Property. Any clabns and defenses to the contrary are hereby waived. 8. CONDEMNATION. Assignor will give Lender prompt notice of any pending or threatened action by private or public entities to purchase or take any or all of the Property through condemnation, eminent domain, or any other means. Assignor authorizes Lender to huervene in Assignor's name in any of the above described actions or clabns. Assignor assigns to Lender the proceeds of any award or claim for damages connected with a condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property. Such proceeds will be considered paymems and will be applied as provided in this Asslgnmeru. This assignmeru of proceeds is subject to the terms of any prior mongage, deed of ttuat, security agreemeru or other lien document. !I. APPOINI'MENT OF A IIECEIVER, On or after an Assignor's default, Assignor agrees to Lender making an application to the coun for an appointmeru of a receiver for the benefit of Lender to take possession of the Property and the Leases, with the power to receive, collect and apply the Rents. Any Rents coUected wm be applied as the court authorizes to pay taxes, to provide insurance, to make repairs and to pay costs or any other expenses relating to the Property, the Leases and Rents, and any remaining sums shall be applied to the Secured Debts. Assignor agrees that this appointment of a receiver may be without giving bond. without reference to the then-existing value of the Property, and without regard to tho insolvency of any person liable for any of the Secured Debts. 10. DUE ON SALE OR ENCUMBRANCE, Lender may, at its option, declare the entire balance of the Secured Debt to be immediately due and payable upon the creation of, or contract for the creation of, any lien. encumbrance, transfer or sale of all or any part of the Property. This right ls subject to the restrictions imposed by federal law (12 C.F.R. 591), as applicable. 11. TRANSFEII. OF AN INTEREST IN THE ASSIGNOR. If Assignor is an entity other than a namral person (such as a COlJX)ration or other organization), Lender may demand immediate payment if: A. A beneficial interest 4t Assignor is sold or transferred. B, There is a change in either the identity or number of members of a partnership or similar entity. C. There is a change In ownership of more than 25 percent of the voting stock of a corporation or similar entity. However, Lender may not demand payment in the above situationa if it is prohibited by law as of the date of this Asaignment. Cbancf Homes, lac. Wasbtngeon Aaf.pmad of 1e1uo nd Haiti W..V.XXXXXIML00937l000051810l,0,0806Y Description: Xing,WA Document-Year.Honth.Day.DocID 2006.512.1283 Page: 4 of 10 Order: 2 Comment: 2006051200121'13.,:cc_,. 12. W ARRANTIE8 AND REPRESENTATIONS. Assignor makes to Lender the following warranties and representations which will continue as long as Um Assigrunent is in effect: A. Power. Assignor is duly organized, and validly existing and in good standing in all jurisdictions In which Assignor operates. Assignor has the power and authority IO enter inlO this transaction and IO carry on Assignor's business or activity as it is now being conducted and. as applicable, is qualified to do so in each jurisdiction in which Assignor operates. B. Authority. The execution, delivery and performance of Um Aasignmeot and the obligation evidenced by this Assignment are within Assignor's powers, have been duly authorized, have received all necessary governmental approval, will not violate any provision of law, or order of court or governmental agency, and will not violate any agreement to which Assignor is a party or to which Assignor is or any of Aasignor's property is subject. C. Name and Place of Buslnes9. Other than previously dlsclooed in writing IO Lender, Assignor has not changed Assignor's name or principal place of business within the last lO years and has not used any other trade or fictitious name. Without Lender's prior written consent, Assignor does not and will not use any other name and will preserve Assignor's existing name, trade names and franchises. D. TIiie. Assignor has good title to the Leases, Rents and Property and the right io assign, bargain, grant and convey to Lender as additiooal security the Leases and Rents, and no other person has any right In the Leases and Rents. E. Rec:ordatlon. Assignor has recorded the Leases as required by law or as otherwise prudent for the type and use of the Property. F. Default. No default exists under the Leases, and the parties subject IO the Leases have not violated any applicable law on leases, licenses and landlords and tenants. Aasignor, at its sole cost and expense, will keep, observe and perform, and require all other parties to the Leases IO comply with the Leases and any applicable law. If Assignor or any party to the Lease defaults or tillls IO observe any applicable law, Assignor will promptly notify Lender. G. Lease Modlftcadon. Assignor has not sublet, modified, extended, canceled. or otherwise altered the Leases, or accepted the surrender of the Property covered by the Leases (unless the Leases so require). H. Enc:umbnmce. Assignor has not assigned, compromised, subordinated or encumbered the Leases and Rents. 13. COVENANTS. Assignor agrees to the following covenants: A. Rent Abatement and Insurance. Wheo any Lease provides for an abatement of Rents due IO fire, flood or other casualty, Assignor will insure against this risk of loss with a policy satisfactory to Lender. Assignor may choose the Insurance company, subject io Lender's approval. which will not be unreasonably withheld. B. Coples of Leases. Aasignor will promptly provide Lender with copies of the Leases and will certify these Leases are true and correct copies. The existing Leases will be provided on execution of lhe Assignment, and all future Leases and any other Information with respect to these Leases will be provided immediately after they are executed. . C. Right To Renls. Immediately after the execution of this Assignment, Assignor will notify all current and future tenants and others obligated under the Leases of Lender's rights IO the Leases and Rents, and will request that they immediately pay all future Rents directly to Lerulcr when Assignor or Lender asks them to do so. However, Assignor does not need to provide Um notice when the Property is farm land or the homestead of Assign.or or Assignor's successor in interest. D. Accounting. When Lender requests, Assignor will provide to Lender an accounting of Rents, prepared in a form acceptable to Lender, subject to generally accepted accounting principles and certified by Assignor or Assignor's accountant to be current, accurate and complete as of the date requested by Lender. CbarCet llomei, Inc. Waahi:Dp)n Ampment of U8lt$ and lttlll:I WA/4XXXXXLML0093710000Sl8S0l5050806Y Descr1ption: King.WA Docwnent•Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512,1283 Page: 5 of 10 Order: 2 Comment: ' ·t 20060512001213!3. -:--:-- E. Lease Modll'lcatlon. Assignor win not sublet, modify, extend, cancel, or otherwise alter the Leases, or accept the surrender of the Property covered by the Leases (unless the Leases so require) without Lender's written consent. J'. l!ncumbnmce. Assignor will not assign, compromise, subordinate or encumber the Leases and Rents without Lender's prior written consent. G. Future Leases. Assignor will not enter into any future Leases without prior writteu consent from Lender. Assignor will execute and deliver such further assurances and assignments as to these future Leases as Lender requires from time to time. H. Penonal Property, Assignor will not sell or remove any personal property on the Property. unless Assignor replaces this personal property with like kind for the same or better value. L Pr,ise, ntlon and Defense or Clabm. Assignor will appear in and prosecute its claims or defend its title to the Leases and Rents against any claims that would impair Assignor's interest under tbls As,ignment and, on Lender's request, Assignor will also appear in any action or proceeding on behalf of Lender. Assignor agrees to as,!gn to I.ender, as requested by I.ender, any right, claims or defenses which Assignor may have against parties who supply labor or materisls to improve or maintain the leaseholds subject to the Leases and/or the Property. I, LlablBty and lndemoiftratlon. Lender does not assume or become liable for the Property', maintenance, depreciation, or other losses or damages when Lender acts to manase, protect or preserve the Property, except for losses or damages due to Lender's gross negligence or intentional torts. Otherwise, Assignor will indemnify Lender and bold Lender harmless for all liability, loss or damage that Lender may incur when Lender opts to exercise any of its remedies against any party obligated under the Leases. K. Leasehold F.atate. Assignor will not cause or permit the leasehold estate under the Leases to merge with Assignor's rcverslonary interest, and agrees that the Leases shall remain in full force and effect regardless of any merger of the Assignor's interests and of any merger of the interests of Assignor and any party obligated under the Leases. L. lmolvency. Lender will be the creditor of each tenant and of anyone else obligated under the Leases who is subject to an assignment for the benefit of creditors, an insolvency, a dissolution or a receivership proceeding, or a bankruptcy. 14. DEFAULT, Assignor will be in default if any of the followins occur: A. Payments. Assignor fails to make a payment in full when due. B. Insolvency or llankruptq. The death, dissolution or insolvency of, appointment of a receiver by or on behalf of, application of any debtor rellef law, ·the assignment for the benefit of creditors by or on behalf of. the voluntary or involuntary tonninatioo of existence by, or the commencement of any proceeding under any present or future federal or state insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, composition or debtor relief law by or against Assignor, Borrower, or any co,-signer. endorser, surety or guarantor of this Assigrunent or any other obligations Borrower has with Lender. C. Business Tennlnadon. Assignor merges, dissolves, reorganizes, ends its business or existence, or a partner or majority owner dies or is declared legally incompetent. D. Failure to Perform. Assignor fails to perform any condition or to keep any promise or covenant or this Assignment. E. Other Documents. A default occurs under the terms of any other document relating to the Secured Debts. F. Other Agnemeoes. Assignor is in default on any other debt or agreement Assignor has with Lender. G. Mlsrepresentallon. Assignor makes any verbal or written statement or provides any financial information that is untrue, inaccurate, or conceals a material fact at the time it is made or provided. H. Judgment. Assignor fails to satisfy or appeal any Judgment against Assignor. Cllller Homes, lac. Wlllhingaon Alllpmcnt of lases aa:d Beall WA/4XXXXXLML,00937IOOOOS1S80l5050806Y Description: King,WA Docwuent-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512,1283 Page: 6 of 10 Order: 2 Comment: ' 20060512001213-'3. ·:··: L llorfebure. The Property is used in a manner or for a purpose that threatens confiscation by a legal authority. · J. Name Change. Assignor changes Assignor's name or assumes an additional name without notifying Lender before making such a change. K. Property Transfer. Assignor transfers all or a substantial part of Assignor's money or property. This condition of default, as it relates to the transfer of the Property, is subject to the restrictions contained in the DUE ON SALB section. L. Property Value. Lender determines in good faith that the value of the Property has declined or is impaired. M. Material Change. Without first notifying Lender, there is a material change in Assignor's business, includlng ownership, management, and financial conditions. N. Jnsecurlt,y, Lender determines in good faith that a materlal adverse change bas occurred in Assignor's financial cooditlon from the cooditions set forth in Assignor's most recent financial statement before the date of this Assignment or that the prospect for payment or performance of the Secured Debts is impaired for any reason. 15. REMEDIES. After Assignor defaults, and after Lender gives any legally required notice and opporllmlty to cure the default, Lender may at Lender's option do any one or more of the following. A. Accelerallon. Lender may make all or any part of the amount owing by the terms of the Secured Debts immediately due. B. Addldonal Security. Lender may demand additional security or additional parties to be obligated to pay the Secured Debts. C. Sources. Lender may use any and all remedies Lender has under Washington or federal law or in any document relating to the Secured Debts. D. Insurance Beae.ftts. Lender may make a claim for any and all Insurance benefits or refunds that may be available on Assignor's default. E. Payments Made On A,,slgoor's Behalf. Amounts advanced on Assignor's behalf will be immediately due and may be added to the Secured Debts. F. Rents. Lender may terminate Assignor's right to collect Rents and directly collect and retain Rents in Lender's name without taking possession of the Property and to demand, collect, receive, and sue for the Rents, giving proper receipts and releases. In addition, after deducting all reasonable expenses of collection from any collected and retained Rents, Lender may apply the balance as provided for by the Secured Debts. G. Entry. Lender may seek the appointment of a receiver to exercise the following powen and duties: to enter. take possession. manage and operate all or any part of the Property; make, modify, enforce or cancel or accept the surrender of any Leases; obtain or evict any tenants or licensees; increase or reduce Rents; decorate, clean and make repairs or do any other act or incur any other cost Lender deems proper to protect the Property as fully as Assignor could do. Any funds collected from the operatioo of the Property may be applied in such order as Lender may deem proper, including, but not limited to, payment of the following: operating expenses, management, brokerage, attorneys' and accountants' fees, the Secured Debts, and toward the maintenance of reserves for repair or replacement. Lender may take such action without regard to the adequacy of the security, with or without any action or proceeding, through any person or agent, or receiver to be appointed by a court, and irrespective of Assignor's possession. The collection and application of the Rents or the entry upon and taking possession of the Property as set out in this section shall not cure or waive any notice of default under the Secured Debts, this Assignment, or invalidate any act pursuant to such notice. The enforcement of such remedy by Lender. once exercised, shall continue for so long as Lender shall elect, ootwlthstandlng that such collection and application of Rents may have cured the original default. Ch2ner Hoate1, Inc. Wuhingtoa Alllpmeat ol Leuet and. ltCldl WA/4XXXXXI.ML0093710000S1180IS0S0806Y OJ.SI% Banter• Sy"enu. Ii,;:., St. Cloud, MN ~ Description: King,WA Document-Year . .Hontb.Day.DocID 2006.512.1283 Page: 7 of 10 Order: 2 Comment: . ·, I B. Waiver. Except as otherwise required by law, by choosing any one or more of these remedies Lender does not give up any other remedy. Lender does not waive a default if Lender chooses not to use a remedy. By electing not to use any remedy, Lender does not waive Lender's right to later consider the event a default and to use any remedies if the default continues or occurs again. 16. TERM. This Assignment will remain in full fon:e and effect until the Secured Debts are paid or otherwise discharged and Lender is no longer obligated to advance funds under any loan or credit agreement which is a psn of the Secured Debts. If any or all payments of the Secured Debts are subsequenlly invalidated, declared void or voidable, or set aside and are required to be repaid to a trustee, custodian, receiver or any other psny under any bankruptcy act or other state or federal law, then the Secured Debts will be revived and will continue in full fon:e and effect as if Ibis payment had not been made. 17. CO.SIGNERS. If Assignor signs Ibis Assignment but is not otherwise obligated to pay the Secured Debts, Assignor does so only to assign Assignor's interest in the Property to secure payment or lhe Secured Debts and Assignor does not agree by signing Ibis Assignment to be personally liable on lhe Secured Debts. If Ibis Assignment secures a guaranty between Lender and Assignor, Assignor agrees to waive any rights that may prevent Lender from bringing any action or claim against Assignor or any party indebted under lhe obligation. These rights may include, but are ·not limited to, any anti-deficiency or one-action laws. 18. CONSTRUCTION LOAN. This Assignment secures an obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement an lhe Property. 19. APPLICABLE LAW. This Assignment Is governed by the laws of Washington. the United States of America, and to the extent required, by the laws of lhe Jurisdiction where the Property is located, except to the extent such state laws are preempted by federal law. 20. JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY AND SUCCESSORS. Each Assignor's obligations under !his Assignment arc independent of the obligations of any olher Assignor. Lender may sue each Assignor individually or together wilh any olher Assignor. Lender may release any psn of lhe Property and Assignor will still be obligated under Ibis Assignment for lhe remaining Property. Assignor agrees that Lender and any psny to Ibis Assignment may extend, modify or make any change in the terms of Ibis Assignment or any evidence of debt without Assignor's consent. Such a change will not release Assignor from the terms of Ibis Assignment. Lender may assign all or psn of Lender's rights under Ibis Assignment without Assignor's consent. If Lender assigns this Assignment, all of Assignor's covenants, agreements, representations and warranties contained in this Assignment wlll benefit Lender's successors and assigns. The duties of this Assignment will bind the successors and assigns of Assignor. 21, AMENDMENT, INTEGllATION AND SEVEllABILlTY. This Assignment may not be amended or modified by oral agreement. No amendment or modification of this Assignment Is efl'ectlve unless made in writing and executed by Assignor and Lender. This Assignment and any other documents relating to the Secured Debts are the complete and final expression of the agreement. If any provision of this Assignment is unenforceable, then the unenforceable provision will be severed and lhe remaining provisions will still be enforceable. 22. INI'ERPRETATION, Whenever used, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. The section beadings are for convenience: only and are not ta be used to interpret or detloc the terms of this Assignment. 23. NOTICE, FINANCIAL REPORTS, ADDfflONAL DOCUMENTS AND RECORDING TAXES. Unless otherwise required by law, any notice will be given by delivering it or mailing tt by both first class and either registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the appropriate party's address listed in the DATE AND PARTIES section, or to any olher address designated in writing. Notice to one Assignor will be deemed to be notice to all Assignors. Assignor will inform Lender in writing of any change in Assignor's name. address or other application information. Assignor will provide Lender any financial statements or information Lender requests. All rmaocial statements and information Assignor gives Lender will be correct and complete. Assignor agrees to pay all expenses, charges and taxes in connection with the preparation aad Ctmcez Home., Inc, Wahington Aatcnmtmorl.aa IDd lwdl WAJ4XXXXX:l.MUJ09'n100005l88015050806Y Description: K1ng,WA Document-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512.1283 Page: 8 of 10 order: 2 Comment: • 2006051.:w·,-,,-,c, ... -.· recording of this Assignment. Assignor agrees to sign. deliver, and file any additional documents or certifications that Lender may consider necessary to perfect, continue, and preserve Assignor's obligations under this Assignment and to confirm Lender's lien status on any Property, and Assignor agrees to pay all expenses, charges and taxes in connection with the preparation and recording thereof. Time is of the essence. SIGNATUIU/8, By signing, Assignor agrees to the terms and covenants contained in this Assignmeut. Assignor also acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Assignment. AlmGNOR: ACKNOWLEDGMENT. (Business or )!ntity) /) I. ,/ _ if 1rMttf OF (Jla(re-<. INJll#i OF ss. I certify that I know or bal>e satisfactory evidence that Mark F, Ludden, b/ar! the per~ who appeared before me, and said persol)OO' acknowledged that Jlll1shellhey· signed this instrument, on oath stated that !Gtsheltlley ~_..,.uthorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of Charter Romes, Inc. oo· be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the =-F/,L,p ~)#/.~ (Notary Public In and for the StateWashlngton, My appointment expires: //-f-tf 7 residing at) &,ttfH,(..(),,r,_ ""-"'-.""- Wasbingmo. Aal&mDmi ol Leasm Imel Rmu WA/4XXXXXJ..Ml,.00910000,188015050805Y •1!196 Banen Systems. Inc., St. Cloud, MN e,J5iiii'tJ: Description: King,WA Docwnent-Year.Montb.Day.DocID 2006.512.1283 Page: 9 of 10 Order: 2 Conunent: Exhibit "A" Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Tract 9, Block 1, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 4, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 47 of Plats, Page(s) 74, In King County, Washington. Tax Parcel Number: 619840-0180-03 Descr1pt1on: King,WA Document-Year.Month.Day.DocID 2006.512,1283 Page: 10 0£ 10 Order: 2 Comment: ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 28, 2005 Ivana Halvorson Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 -72"d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Revised Design for the Preliminary Short Plat for the Rathinam Property DDES Project No. L04S0003, Activity No. L05RE025 Dear Ms. Halvorson: The Subdivision Technical Committee of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has reviewed your client's proposed modification to the design for the preliminary short plat of the Rathinam Property .. The Committee has concluded this re-design does not contain "any substantial changes," as referenced in KCC 19A.12.060A. Therefore, based on this finding, approval is granted to the revised preliminary short plat received October 6, 2005, subject to the original conditions of approval issued September 17, 2004 ( except as modified below), and the following condition. A right-of-way width of 32 feet shall be provided for the on-site road (Road A) .. Due to the changes to the prelimin-a-ry short plat design which are reflected on the October 6, 2005 submittal, the following conditions from the September 17, 2004 LUSD approval of the preliminary short plat are no longer applicable: lD, 3F, 3G, 3Ml, 3M2, 6B, and 7B. The lead-in paragraph of Condition 7E is also revised to read as follows: The ~500 square feet reereatiea tract configuration of Tract A is consistent with the requireinents ofKCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190. Recreation improvements shall be provided in Tract A consistent with KCC 21A.14.180 and .190 (ice-c e.g., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). F~LE COPY ' ... • .. • • Revised Design for the Preliminary Short Plat for the Rathinam Property October 28, 2005 · Page2of2 Enclosed is a copy of the approved, revised, preliminary short plat design for your records. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 296-6632. Lanny Henoch, Planner II Current Planning Section, LUSD ·Enclosure cc: Sharmila Rathinam, owner Erik Wicklund, Charter Homes, Inc. Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w/encl. Pat Sin1mons, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w / encl. Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w/encl. Joanne Carlson, Administrative Specialist II, Engineering Review Section, w/encl. Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD File No. L04S0003 Page 1 of 1 Brendan Madden From: Brendan Madden Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 3:50 PM To: 'Herron, Ruby' Subject: Rathinam Short Plat BCE#11614 Ruby- Could you pull the files for the abovementioned project (KC File no. L04SR077) for me? I really need to take a look at the file first thing in the morning? Would this be possible, and if so, what time do you open? Thanks Ruby. -Brendan Brendan Madden Assistant Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 ( 425) 251-6222 -Phone ( 425) 251-8782 -Fax http://www.barghausen.com 5/23/2006 Parcel Number. 6198400180 Taxpayer. SINGH HARDIAL Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 11634 SE 192ND ST Postal City: Renton, 98058 ---------------- Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 0 Rec: nil Lot: 9; Block: 1 Kroll Page: 605 W Thomas Bros. Page: 686 114-S-T-R: SW-33-23-5 Acres: 2.24 (97574 SqFI.} ------------- Current Zoning: R-6-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assesso~s Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: Y Land Value: 136000 Improvements Value: 38000 --------- Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: NIA School District: Renton 403 Fire District: 40 ~ Roads MPS Zone: 342 ($3730.00 Waterfront: PRIVATE Water Se,vice: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Se,vice: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 6 Rob McKenna (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz (D) Drainage Basin: Soos Creek, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 Se,vice/Finance Strategy Area: Full Se,vice Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: NIA TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number: NIA -------- Building Inspection Area: Cleo Rubalcaba Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Sheryl Lux ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tenzing Thinley ----------- Sens~ Areas Notice(s) on Title: -/ Please indicate the numbers and types of representatives that will be at the pre-application meeting fr9m your design team: Will Not -nd []Applicant 0Architect 0Civil Engineer 0Developer Will Attend D D D D. Total Number Attending: Will Not Will Attend Attend 0Geotechnical Consultant D DLandscape Architect D 0Legal Consultant D 0Property Owner 2-3 VVill Not Attend D Structural Engineer D Wetlands Consultant D Others: _____ _ I certify that I am the applicant for this pre-application meeting request and I understand that DOES will assess hourly review fees for each DOES staff member involved in pre-application research, meetings and post-meeting follow-up work, and that I assume financial responsibility for all fees associated with this request. ~ J::( :¥:: Applicant's signature Note: A minimum advance deposit fee of~is required to schedule a pre-application meeting. All checks must be payable to King County Office of Finance. if you have any questions about your pre-application meeting, please contact DDES at (206) 296- 6600. Land Use Pre-AppUcatlon Meetings Information & Request Form le-infreq-preap 12/20/02 Page2 of2 Dehkordi, Fereshteh From: Sent: To: Subject: - Whittaker, Bruce Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:39 AM Dehkordi, Fereshteh Accepted: Pre-app with the applicant, A03P0139 1 ~ \ ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Project Description: \ '1.. -Lo T s V\ ~ c:, 1 '1 i Permit(s) being requested: PL-A--1 Project Address/Location: \ \ 3 L S <c: Please indicate if pre-application is: ..g['Land Use Feasibility D Mandatory D Consolidated Check the box(es) regardin I ou wish to discuss: '@_and Use Pe It Issue · division CUP/~ Reasonable Use/ PAUE "Kl Site Issue : Zonin Set ~nsjty / ~Utidivision De~gn I Landscaping D Site Issues: ,c / Road Access-n:foad lmjlrovementtRoad Variances/ Parking Layout D Site Issues: Drainage I Site Development/ SWDM Variances & Adjustments D Shoreline Issues: Substantial Development Permit / Permitted Uses / Shoreline Setbacks D SEPA Issues: SEPA Checklist/ Off-Site Improvements I Mitigation D Wetland/Stream Issues: Buffers/ Building Setbacks/ Flood Plains/ Mitigation D Geotechnical Issues: Sleep Slope/ Landslide/ Seismic/ Coal Mine/ Erosion D Clearing/Grading Issues: Site Development / Clearing Restrictions / Site Restoration D Building Issues: Building/ Mechanical: HVAC/Energy/ Barrier-Free standards D Fire Issues: UFC / Fireflow / Access / Sprinklers / Alarms / Hazardous Materials D Health Issues: Sewer/ Septic/ Water/ Groundwater/Noise Impacts D Other (Specify):--------------------- Land Use Pre-Application Meetings Information & Request Form lc-infreq-preap 12/20/02 Page 1 of 2 • J.. ., lduu k ,:>....-,../ /-rrz;\/'4<V'o~ ..... 7 s -W<D ,T j.y\ ....,.....,_ 'T .............. _ Thursday, Jun 12, 2003 03:21 PM King County -ODES - /<. .o l,..) St= /Cf2. n <} ea 11~.-~ .. :1~ ' aA--fa,,-,J ![ /.,}ow ~.+a,/ --u e...L-.../ 3 .., J.__ Cj" ~C...? ~ .. :--. ~; :" i "=-===·===~·-=· .r=,=---~ • ·;,..r, A03P0139 PREAPP-FEASBLTY A 05/14/2003 PENDING RATHINAM. SHARILA A99M0056 PREAPP-PREAPP-M A 02/16/1999 PHlDING JAEGER ENGR E0300203 ENFORCI ENFORCE p 03/05/2003 PENDING RATHINAM, PRADEEP E88-216 ENFORCI E~JFORCE p 03/10/1988 CLOSED BRATTON DOUGLAS E9700138 ENFORCI GRADE p 02/21/1997 PEND[t,JG BRATTON. D W & VICKY E9900922 ENFORCI ENFORCE p 07/16/1999 CLOSED BRATTON D & VICKI E9901050 ENFORCI ENFORCE p 08/03/1999 CLOSED BRATTON DE &VICKI :ir.11n:1 ~(~ ,:,,==-----------------------------------------=s i' 1i~ ~~ f~;' :,.,, ','.,,.' .'. Thursday, Jun 12, 2003 03:22 PM King County. DOES Thursday, Jun 12, 2003 03:22 PM King County · ODES BDOA KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOl PAI11260-Sl REAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 06/12/03. 15:18:33.3 SITUS: 11634 SE 192ND ST 98055 ACCOUNT, 619840-0180-0 TAXPAYER: SINGH HARDIAL ·LOT: 9 BLK, 1 QSTR: SW 33 23 05 PLAT: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 04 JURS: KING CO * LAND ZONE ACTUAL D A T A • I • • B u I L D I N G DAT A * * BLDG MISC BLDG INFO 1 OF 1 * * I BLDG SQ FOOTAGE DATA JURISDICTION KING co I ACRES 2.24 I WATER SYSTEM WTR DIST I FIRST FLOOR 1/2 FLOOR 2ND FLOOR SEWER VIEW OPEN SPACE TIDELANDS WATERFRONT FEET WFT LOCATION WFT BANK WFT RIGHTS ONLY PRIVATE I UPPER FLOOR NO I TOTAL BSMT I FIN BSMT I BSMT GARAGE I TOTAL LIVING AREA I ATTACHED GARAGE I I ROOMS I BEDROOMS 680 680 2 YEAR BUILT #STORIES #LIVING UNITS DAYLIGHT BSMT HEAT SOURCE HEAT SYSTEM ACCESSORY IMPS POOL AREA POOL CONSTR DET GARAGE AREA CARPORT AREA MOBILE HOME ================================================================= ( CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, 1948 · 1. 0 1 GAS FLR-WAL YES 0. 3) == <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. BDOA KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOl PAI11280-Sl REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 06/12/03 15:18:38.1 ACCOUNT: 619840-0180-0 SITUS: 11634 SE 192ND ST 98055 TAXPAYER: SINGH HARDIAL QSTR: SW 33 23 05 JURS: KING CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION -PAGE 1 LOT 9 BLOCK 1 PLAT: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 04 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV# 4 * END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION* 0.0) ====================================================================-======--== CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <ENTER> FOR MORE LEGALS, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. f !l?~-P1W?l~1J! rwm»t.r''" , st . .,,,.,,.,, f~W~li'k,11 f P~~ tf,~\f{i;i4~~~B,fiJl:'tJ '~[i;'iah1Zil ffif{fi[~f:!F.t~?tt,&iT:tillti?~':'tl~~ ,~woe;{~$~ffif,;;~ij,}~&i iro;¥SiM I i A99M0056 ! PREAPP·! PREAPP·! A i 9601 i Adminisllative Servi I PENDIN~ DREAM CRAFT /BRATTON j 33-23-5 14 LOTS i19980' • jE 88-21.6 ...... ..l. EN FD RCS E NFOR c; .. P ............. J.8901 ... ...!. Building: .Code .E nlo ........ ...l. CLOSED .. J..i NOPE RAB LE /JUNK .MOT OR!._s E E .. COMM ENT S-VIOLA TIO 1~1.9880'.: i ~ ; E9700138 i ENFORCl:i GRADE IP I 9601 l Building· Code Enlo ! PENDIN~ CLEARING SITE, WORKING! STREAM OR WETLAND(FL0\1997021:'. (~::~~~;~ + ~~:~:~~. ~~:~:~t~... . ......... l::~~ +:~::~:~~ ••• ~:~: .~~:: 1 ~~~~~~: J :::;~~~.~~~~~~~~pi:;~TLi~:~:~;;; ! A01PM057 I PREAPP·I LUSD ! A i 2010 i Administrative Servi I MTG·HEU SUPRA PREL PLAT FEAS181U PRELIMINARY PLAT ··11 L0Ti20010E,-, I ...... . ......... . ....... ... .................................... . ······························································································· .... ················· ...................................... , .. '· I I Thursday, Jun 12, 2003 02:45 PM King County • ODES ~ t--------- 0, ~l: i .. ' ..,-c.i.., -" • ~~ ' !" ~ 07/ i: > ~ <>,.. ;. '~j9J." i;:.. .......... c) ~ <) "'t.., ¢,• .. "\-.. ""' ,,...,... I ..-. o "' • .... ,. 0. m .. I ~ • " " "> "> ' ~ J ,. ~ ~ ----.. .. "I .. ""l-...... , a ~ .. C?-, q, r') .., "' .. .. " "? "• '" • ' 4 ,- ';. ; ~ '< ~ .., .3 • ,o,I',,,.,.,.., '\.i .. .i..~~; -0 <' • .. ., ., 9, 0 II> " ~@ 0 i-, \l) ~ ~ "I 0 "Z. > -a I.I) r ~ u <.. ' ~ er. ~ r "Z. ;. G 0 ' M ' " ' l JO l :J99% 'MS££-90-£l · 66-866 l VM ' LI!)I , 0 . i' ~ ' 0 . ., .., J ' ., 4---- 0 0 "' " J ' ~ r .., ci ::i 0 0 ~ ., "' ~ --.,-,; 'a. , 0 ..-.,.:..oro ,.., -'• ~ ~ ' ' l• "' ~ "l ~ ' .• •).,"'("')."h~ C' • • .. ~ ' ~ "' ,; ~ I- U1 0 z !\I !r 11) U1 0 "' ,,j "' "' - I I Dev. Cond. Query Result -ODES, King County Washington Page I of I @King County 1 · 'rrfyff;r§ 11 · ®M 11 @t:i#fi I mf·!i/iu1§,'(§1 I .. %ti ·1 Deve~o[Pmen,i Coniditioni Query Resu~ts " Paree~ Search Parcel Number: 6198400180 --·------· Listed below are both Post-Conversion and Pre-Conversion development conditions which are associated with the parcel you entered. To view text for a development condition, choose a condition code in either box below and click on a Get Text button. Otherwise click on 'New Query' at the bottom of this page to perform another parcel search. Post-Conversion Conditions Pre-Conversion Conditions (Effective August 18, 1997) (Prior to August 18, 1997) KCC-16.82.lSOD SCP-P17 SC-P3 I SCP-P3 I ' 50-220 i SCP-P4 SCP-P7 ' -----+-----·· 1r1:···,-.:jr~,-~ .... i;r:;:,1trl · ''Get Text/· :"·,····-.......... , ...... ·I 1 ''Get. Text · ~ r,--~ ....... : ...... i--~· ... ,~,., .. "* ~ .• .., ... ~"<"'.'.r·-~-~-i·~ -·'.:~-r-~~--~-·+··---~--:-~'. tW.:. ''.); ', 1'c:litR;1k~'r'elfqP:a nibiiP'.~iMerftierydl/.clispl~)'. : .. ,, . ' .·· . , ·. h ;, ,·., , , 11hh. ".1<1q1.,li': .. IJ:. , .... , r, ,,1"··1· "! ,.ui h!' ,,,~.1,,; '>J,,.1,,l1!ll<1P,lf 1/k l•t·•1 .i,,,,. --,· ,.I, , .,J, ,,,1, ·-1, Updated: December 29, 1998 King.County J DDES_Pagsi J DDES/GIS Pi'!9e J NewQuery J News I Services I Comments. I S(ct<'l_u;h Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. · The detai!s http://appsOI.metrokc.gov/www6/ddes/new _ direct.cfm 06/12/2003 ffSiimW_•t#·iAiiiX"1Wt-iJ.1w'1_,ni&Jm.,~. ---. . . >: • -~tlrii.:t:*<~~-~~)t1_~~.'.-ii~~P_;+;:·_~~rl_ ~ .. >1{-,: ~r,'t~.'--;~.i.~[rr:·,,1511®: ---..... ____ .. __ .rJJ.:!t:.fll.--";;.,,.,J~--~~-~f;,il.-l!,.,~:-::.:.Z~ :l.~,--,··.·- Addiessn11634 .SE 192ND. ~T .K.~ . ,, . . . . '-'':_.c.c'.. ·;..' ('"\:c.'..c..: ~· ~~"-"-'-N_umber:: jA03P0139 Status: jMTG·HELD ·. 'Date: .1951; ·t'ue · . ~PPU~NT: IRATHINAM, SHARILA . •: • ' ,"·" • ... '. •. : • ,i ,, ''.-,'.'-·· •'.'~,--~' ·: ",,'_ ..• ' ·7:::;,:··~"-i,..,--'--~"-'-,-''--'..:'•:;.·..:·,;.1,'..,...~2,:',-~6~"""'~,i,r,,~~5i5! ;iji)\io:J,:,.,:· u , .-,~ , 1 ,} ·Ty~e: !comment Text: mtg held this date. Bruce Whittaker, Kris Langley and I attended. see nores in the file. I. Effective: I 71712003 .rhr..t I 1213112020. 1. · Entered By: !Feresteh.Dehkordi User Id: !PLAN FD EH · I Entered: ! 7/7/2003 T oolBar Order !:licensee: KING COUNTY, WA I S~riarNu")ber' 6136· Useis: .150 · I Versi6ri~v}]:?'( r if)startl '/#J ~ ® 0 @. @Dev. Co~d. Query ReSu1 .. ; I w;fj 'PERMITS' Plus j · •I<~ Y.2 ·:i:31 ~M ~ .~ (C ~ D W1 ~ fRl'(J FEB 1 7 2004 llJi Kc. o.o.E.s. Tuesday, Feb 17, 2004 03:31 PM L04S0003 RATHINAM ,! SchodalScllocl FacliUel /VJ'* ~ >,Jr~l.lnel s-f-R ~~ ,'"/OSUNES ~SEQJNES '/VfWAJNES N SII-. Wallrllodll Road~Wll'f Pata C]Partca ~10-~oneCUper10acres • A.36 -Ac1laAnl, one CU per 35 acres -F-Rnll -M-l,lr,e,al R.t.2.5. ~Arm.one OU per Saam AA5. ~Arm.one CU per Saam R.t.10. ~Arm.one OU per 10 acres UR. Urtan Rae«w. one OU per 5 acres 11.1 • Relldlnllal, one OU per IICl9 R-<4 • Relldlnllal, 4 OU per IICl9 R-e • Relldlnllal, e OU per IICl9 =~2~=.11!/1~£' :'9-a R.18 • Reeldenllal, 18 OU per acn, R-24 • Reeldenllal, 24 OU per IICl9 Ra48 • Relldenllal, 48 OU per acn, NB • NelllllbomoOd Bulir*8 -CB. Corimntl' ~ RB. RIQlol.i S...- 0 • Offlcie 1-lrdJ111111 Noty llclundnl I I I Clliel 0 500 1000 Feet , .. ,oooklel ®King County ---..... -... -~bl' 1°"""Yftllfhmo_ol __ ,.,....1o -"11'--l<lril°'""Y-"" ~ ......... warn-. .... «~-~----.-.-.--., ........ _"' .. :·=\~c::r::=-~q FQ~MYk9~2J~,~~~~~?, l'lol dalto: Mar 11, 2004; l'OIN001"'°1~\IIY-~apr <® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 7, 2003 A03P0139 12-lot plat Zoning • All improvements must be labeled to be removed. If the house stays, then proper setback must be maintained. Tiris must show on the site plan. • Combined rec. and RID tract will have I 00% credit if a vault or underground storage is built. If open pond is proposed then, only 50% of the RID will be considered for Rec. space subject to KCC 21A.14.180F. • Lots 6 and 9 appears to have a substandard width. May consider redesign to create a better layout. • Subject to significant tree retention. If clearing, then significant trees must be replaced. Drainage • • o Level II flow control and basic water quality 0 0 0 0 Sh~uld consider extending the road to the north property boundary and provide a temporary cul de sac for future circulation. Must dedicate 20 feet of ROA along SE 192•• Street Frontage improvements are required. Located in MPS zone 342 and subject to $3730/lot fee. J Sc.-f..o, I tJ ...,{/c..w~ ,,,_;_f'n:,,;~L..,,_ 1J . h,,t,,,,.-f b,<!.. ;-0 <; c::. fA .,. ,, I "' r /kc-. h "'.J f I<-',,::... I>-( ci.,t.<. '-'-• h ... , k, L04S0003 RATHINAM S-T-R ,•~ ,' QSUNES ~SEO.JNES '/vTWP..JNES N ~ Aer1al l'llOlos • 2000 N Qty Bolnlar1ea Ollea 0 100 1-.2001ee1 200 Feel ® King Cculty n.--.. ----~~ kire°""Y-lromaYalolyd--lou,jldD dwva--IQ,gCony-no --o,--o,~•DIN aancy.~ --otrlgNaDIN-d ::...-=-~~=-:.=:.a¥ --.. ...... -....... -...... ~--h-o,--allN_,,_ -........... ...,,_., .... _.,_ °"""""""lo~-~---"' o...ty. Plot dale: Mar 11 , 2004; llddll001lx01'Gla\8V_~ A03P0139 FLOW CONTR N T-.Np lilel S-T-R " 'OSUNES ~SECUNES '/\/TWPUNES N S11.- I.HO -Specfflc Flow Com,!~ ~1FCArea • ~2FCArea • ~3FC/Vu ---Corilrol Recp...-CJ ~ 1 FC Area -~2FCArea N CllV- 0 soc 1-.10001ee1 1000 F811 ®King r.ounty n. __ ..... _ ... __ 111' 1QroQu1y--•_,,"' ___ ..., .. ---IOl9Qu1y-no ~ .. -_.,....._ ... .. _,.,,,_,.,...__ .. ,w-.... -"' --IQro(:mny-llOlba_,.,_, _..._...--... ---.._h*dr9,bulnol_ ....... _., .... ..--. ...... -.,-"' .. --..... -,,,,,_"' .. _"'_ ......... ..--i,y-,.-o1 Qu1y. Plot-: Jun 12, 2003; 1-«l1l>c01'91 .. v_cle\llpojeCls-.Z.apr L OLH!j PED A03P0139 WATER QUALi NO LHDA'S MAPPED N T~llnes S-T~ A/QSUNES ~SEQ.INES 7'ii/TWPUNES N S11.- 1 W-Bodles --:) Parcell c- Bogo BOG °" oww ca Sole Source Aq,ilfll -Speclic w-QuallyRequhnwa -WQT.-,,..,iA/9a(TA) -S.....LIUTA -~ Signllcanl Stum TA ~ W-Qually Req,.nmor,ls C]-WOTA -~._..TA N City- 0 500 1000 Feet 1-.1000 feel ® King County Thl __ an._....., __ ........,by !Qrvco.rt;--••ort,lyol-ondlldjod lo -.--1Qrv0aul1y-.... __ ., __ .. ...,....,_ .... -,,,:y, ..,.,....,_ -.. ,.... .... _,,, ---1Qrv0aul1y-nolbo-to,ot,y _.....-.--... --Cllfflrl9lll~Wnal.,._to.bll,.......arlolll ..-~ ....... _.,...._,,, .. __ COf'llaNd an la ,nap.. An/ .. cl IHI map or Warmll:i:ln onu.......,11--by-~ol Oaul1y. Pio( -Jwl 12. 2001; 1\ddel001\a01'cllllrl_devlpojedslbMe2. ~1--~~~1 ,,,,--. ~ * • '- ' Sill ' \ I ~~ • A03P0139 ARTERIALS /\/ Towrahlp Unes $-T-R ,''\ /• QSUNES 'A•/ /AV. SECUNES '/\:/ TWPUNES 1\/-w--o - Cities /\/City- 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet 1-.3333- ®King COUnty ____ on.,.m1pl'a-....._t,y Mlr'll°"""Y--•YOl!olyol-..ilo .......... .........--.... I 1-.._-Mlr'IIOully-.. ,.,.w-..,.wot~apwor~••a. c,ancy, -----orriglak>h i.-ol --~Oully-nolbo_l«.., # ~---or--_ _....., ... ,.._..,.,.. __ ..,.,.. ..-............ ..-or-olh---on.,._ lfft-ol ... m1por-..-. ............. ....--1,y-~ol Oully Plot datr. Jun 12, 2003; \lddel0()1\x01'ollav_de',lprojecll~ Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Pre-Application Fee Credit Form To initiate the pre-application credit process to your permit application, please submit a copy of this form to the technician handling your application at the time of submittal. The credit amount will be determined by the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES), Finance Section. Note: This form is to advise DDES staff that a pre- application was reviewed under pre-application file number: A03P0139 F ereshteh Dehkordi Planner Technician (initials): Application Activity Number: A03P0139 Copies to: Planner Cashier Forma\aprs\PeeCredt.Prm 3/19/99 clc July 7, 2003 Date King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 ~\. Inspector's Daily Report Project No.:_-'~'-------· _..::.f_f __ Activity No.: £0 ( J' .p bl 3, f Project Name: ______________________ ...c._ __ ' Location: ______________ Developer/Contractor: __________ _ Date Signed REPORT Note: Each entry must be dated and signed . - S\Forms\Current Forms\!nS-Dail.Pm -0!-16-2001 \ ·' -· CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PUNCH LIST for Roads, Drainage, and Erosion Control Facilities Punch List Date: 10/18/07 Project Name: RATHINAM SHORT PLAT Project No.: L04S0003 Activity No.: LOSSI128 Activity Type: INSPCT-S Location: I I 634 SE 192ND ST I The Land Use Services Division has a computer tracking system that uses project and activity numbers. Please refer to both the project and the activity.numbers when inquiring about this project. ./").~,. // ' ,..(." 2 This official punch list is valid for 30 days. Changes wilJ,riot be,(:lade within the 30-day limit without the expressed review and approval ofth(:';enio~Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section. Any extensions to the 30-daY,,liini_t'fuµst be ~I?fii".ed by the inspector. Deviations from this policy should .b6ifep~Jt'ed to the Senior'Engineer at (206) 296-7236. · 0~ )h ~ )11 3 Computer generated punch lists may app::~~~S~~mi~~i9tpunch list items::i5~cause they are not numbered I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... etc. This is not'it mistake, but due to the way the computer stores the standard con{i\i~ listing. "'·~ ;'.;,1, .,."t.., ,,.., ; \.. I 00 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: \,\~::~jr'•>,...,.,'-..,.._ ···,)Jb'"/' 101 Flush all storm dra~.a&~)ines and clean ~t/i~hJi~lVmanhole sumps, including any retention/deten.t.i9 ... IJisyst~i.~.'.\. \t( ,i, 1::::'t( ,,~r~ 1 ·\~ I 04 Remove sediment ?~.ild.-up}.fr .. • .o· m. t 1 he. retentidn/detention system. '\;).., ;,i h-..,,,,_ µt!"' I 05 CBs ;tr11J&::7J1.ive rniM~\1~;~'a·}1~I,;J~'.ftii:])i'6: 1 Correct to meet 1993 KCRS type I CB d/ili;~ ,, I,<~~'>-. •I •,'I'•, .,.., ./\. . ""'· ., ~.·~ fl . l I d h l 106,f· ,:flie,elevatJons around'the pond,,over ow structure, met and out et o not mate pans. I~'ttdh,SD facility as\p;r planslProvide verification as per punch list item 130. ~'~ 1) I 07 The elb~t);:,rifice an4\ f>ottom section of the control structure riser is required to be bl ''''p::,,, 'd 'l•f bl . remova e.'· .ro .. vi ,1 .. e.,remova e section. ··,111,,:1·. ,>i'!F' !i)11lll"plj).V 11.19.1 I 08 Attach bottom,ladder to wall. 112 Add locking bolts to the following catch basins: all CBs except those on rolled curb. 120 Install the fence around the drainage retention/detention facility with the correct.brace rail as per plans. See sheet CS. 121 Verify the pipe inverts entering and exiting the detention pond are constructed per the approved plan. Page I of 5 Print Date: I 0/16/2007 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PUNCH LIST for Roads, Drainage, and Erosion Control Facilities for Project Number: L04S0003 Punch List Date: 10/16/2007 130 Provide verification (per Retention/ Detention Facilities "In Operation" Requirements by Public Rule) by a licensed surveyor (LS) or professional civil engineer (PE) as follows: a. Dimensions (LS) b. Required and actual volumes (live and dead storage) (LS) c. Elevations (LS) d. Easement/tract comers surveyed and staked (LS) e. If not fenced, the pond and berm slopes are to be 3(H): I (V) or flatter (LS) f. Inti ltration rate (PE) /1'~ g. Berm embankments fully completed (PE) ~ .,,. 200 ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS, f' 201 The roadway barricade on Road A is not required,1~li\:om~~9[roadway from neighboring plat, Jessie Glen. Update final pl~f1i"rerl.ect this change/Rian. change# I. 205 Seal all asphaltjoints. As~+':'11,v ... ,,,. ~) y 206 Seal around all monuments. .r e-..,, /,i\, ·w~·, ,11i>,,'!1 207 Stripe the road and/or intersectiori\/per;the approved pians;•contact Morgan Wong at the King County Department ofTrans¢ortati~a!,(206) 296-6596/ 'vTh 'i1f'./ ·lJ.,, l " i1t11 ts,u1·1:11IJ!J"h1,,, J / \ +. .rt!:; .... t •,/1,'.'.'\11,, ,;,> 208 Install illumination as per plans. Proviae approvaHetter·from King County DOT(Linda M tt) 4' ,;er;,._ ,vr· 1 / 0 , ,fi;'.J'.t._ ·•1"• •. '. ., l /\.)1"'' ~i..'"'1111 Ul1)V!) ' .. , ,/ ..,a:,y 1,1cv,11 \\ 209 Install channe"Iiiation as p~r 2hannelization~lans. Provide approval from KC DOT ' . " '.,',. J \ / Traffic as per note;8t1'P,larys ... 1,> l 300 SID EWALk;Cl:J~~ 1 %~~:G~TTi{l:::?i /, .... -., ' ' '>, "'·' ' /'-1i/ -..,: ·.1,'iii'b "''-i/H-_.., 1(-·'/ '1~ fi), '.J;1'.1 i,;.li!11~~ . 1:P 301,/~l:,<Blean and sweep allisidewall<s a,nd curbs. ~'\', \.\ y 303 Replace~proken sidewalk and/or curb in the following location(s): as marked out in the "'"' tJ field. •i: :/:~\ .. /i._ 305 Fill behind ~111,a~(s 1 ~f sidewalk to provide a smooth transition. Restore denuded areas within ROW arid/drainage tract with topsoil, seed and mulch cover. <I' 306 The driveway installed for the pond access road is not per 1993 KCRS. See plan change #I. Either provide a plan that complies with 1993 KCRS or obtain variance. Clean up area surrounding the driveway. 309 Provide 5' landing area as per plans at Sta I 0+00 at the bottom of concrete ramp. See sheet C4. Page 2 of 5 Print Date: 10/16/2007 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PUNCH LIST for Roads, Drainage, and Erosion Control Facilities for Project Number: L04S0003 Punch List Date: 10/16/2007 400 OTHER COMMENTS: 407 Outstanding Design Plan Changes must be addressed before Final Construction Approval can be issued. Please address the following outstanding design plan changes: #1. 408 Install significant trees as per Significant Tree Retention plan. 460 Landscaping, recreational equipment and street tree inspections will be handled under a separate punchlist. Please contact the inspector for details. 0 . /,~ 500 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (~ ORDINANCE/ HEARING EXAMINER CONDIT-IONS: The fo~ing condition(s) 501 must be addressed before Final Construction Appt6v~l:, " "-~>i, <~' '"11111.il.., 502 Stabilize all denuded areas by vegetating,,s{e'Jlhg and rrlulching or bettef. \,_~ ~~/A 504 PLAT/SHORT PLAT RECORDING NOTICE: IF\THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS NOT BEEN RECORDED, A PERFOE,,fy:jf,NCE FINANCI~IQ:QUARANTEE WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE RECORDING>,PLEASE CON'FAG'.f THE INSPECTOR TO OBTAIN THE FINANCIAL GUA~T~>;:T.y7 800 NON CONSTRUCTION RELATED REQ!JIREN'IIENTS:}' ,/~·,," \ I/ ~~'"'.'.'."'!···i 1\1)1,,4r,J· '1·1/:t;./ 801 FINAL co~~TED TE,~~ICAL INF-@..RM-":TION REPORT AND/OR.FINAL CO~~CT fb~~~_: The 1teyi.sed Code of~W,mgt?n 18.43 and the Wash,?gton. Adm1mstrahve Cot:l&]),?6 ,re~M'f\l,,!;ll plans, ~pec1ficat10ns, plats and reports (mcludmg any change~)-~~:R;:_parcil,~n'ed~dated;"and sta"mped by a licensed engineer. 804 ~~L ~,TED,~HN~FORMATION REPORT (TIR) REQUIRED: ll''•, . '·::. \ "·;,., .... ~,? . . ,;::l'!:,The applicant shallisupply two (2)'cop1es of the corrected TIR to this office. The FINAL •. ., 'i,)!11Jh,.'.1k, \pl;,-,1, 'I ,;}I' C©R,RECTED TIR will reflec;,tiany drainage design plan changes. If no drainage design pl~ch)nges were apbr6ved, copies of the original TIR are acceptable. Copies of the TIR shall b';:'l\Jar~ed "FINA£ CORRECTED TIR". One copy will be kept by DOES and one will be fofW/ti'!,ied tq.{J/e King County Department of Natural Resources for permanent , l\j1j1i' J '1, ,j\l,I record keep1n'gU,1::'·c;i ,v ,1· '11,il )/ Page 3 of5 Print Date: I 0/16/2007 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PUNCH LIST for Roads, Drainage, and Erosion Control Facilities for Project Number: L04S0003 Punch List Date: 10/16/2007 806 A TWO YEAR MAINTENANCE AND DEFECT financial guarantee warranting the successful operation and maintenance of RIGHT-OF-WAY improvements and/or DRAINAGE FACILITIES, and guaranteeing the workmanship, materials and design used in the construction of the improvements and/or facilities is required. Please contact the Financial Guarantee Management Unit (FGMU), at (206) 296-7009, to obtain the proper forms. DO NOT SUBMIT THIS FINANCIAL GUARANTEE UNTIL ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION PUNCHLIST ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. THE TWO YEAR MAINTENANCE AND DEFECT PERIOD SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL OR RECORDING~WHICH EVER IS ,, .. .,, ., ... LAST. The amount of this guarantee, (25% of the total cos(s,(including a 30% contingency and mobilization factor) for existing right-9t;S0a'0\fild future public road improvements and drainage facilities as shown on. the ... ~pancidkgila~ntee worksheet) is: $ 27,296.00 ,/;C'~ "\ "'\,~ 808 A PUBLIC AGENCY MAINTENANCE AND'DEFECT AGREEMEN'.f warranting the "· ··" " "-' .? successful operation and maintenance ofRIGJ;:IJ.,OF WA'-Y improvements,and/or DRAINAGE FACILITIES, and guaranteeing tlie iror~n{an~hjp, materials~ design used in the construction of the improvements and/or f~iihie~ is required. THE TWO YEAR MAINTENANCE AND DEFE'?;f,,..~ERIOD SHAb1<N~T BEGIN UNTIL FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAE OR,RECORDING;-,WHICH EVER IS LAST. "'li,"i;.,· ,, : : ·,~ "\;' : \,, /,J Please contact the Financial Guarantee'Mahagement Unit, at (206) 296-7009, to obtain the proper forms. \~ .. ~.':~:;,_ .. Y ... ~-. . \~ #'Z, £ 812 DRAINAGE FAC:I.CIJ:J,1?IABILITY P0ldCY (KC<:;;,9.04.100) Any person required to construct a drain'.lfe facili~Y.{except dow~~pout roof drain infiltration systems) shall maintain a liabiiify,policy 1n1the amount of':H,900,000 which shall name King County as an additional ins~r~d"-Thii tolicx shall remliilfin effect until construction approval or acceptanceJor maint~r\~Jice,'wnichevercis"lfst. THE POLICY FOR THIS PROJECT .,,,., ,.' : __ ·-..... •,·,,. ...... -..,.;,; ' / MUS'.FN0'REX'PJRE BEFORE THE'FINANCIAL GUARANTEES ARE RELEASED. 1rf.IE POLICY'MUSJ BEl:XT.ENDED TO CONFORM TO THE KING COUNTY ~~C)P.E DESCRIBE~~BOVE{~' "-..J, 'n Y 814 INSPEC:f!ON FEES:\After all other punch list items have been approved by the inspectilr;:},-;s,ummaq,_gf Charges and Paymen_ts wil! b~ provided to you.. Final Construct10nApp.:,9:val can not be granted until the md1cated fees are paid. NOTE: Thi'Su'hiniary of Charges and Payments is not a final fee determination, additional cha\{es may appear after Final Construction Approval. All outstanding V invoices must be paid before any Financial Guarantees can be released. In order to avoid delays in processing, please notify the inspector when fee payment has been made. 840 Provide a certification, by a professional land surveyor, that the survey monuments have been set as shown on the final plat documents. This requirement is for PUBLIC roads only. Page 4 of 5 Print Date: 10/16/2007 ' . • ,. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PUNCH LIST for Roads, Drainage, and Erosion Control Facilities for Project Number: L04S0003 Punch List Date: 10/16/2007 990 FINAL CORRECTED PLANS: FOR ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Submit a complete set of archival quality mylars. Mylars shall be pi}oto mylar.or ink-on- mylar, minimum 4 mil thickness. In addition, one (I) blue-line copy of the complete construction plan set is:required. All plans must reflect all Minor and Design Plan · Changes. The blue-lines must have all Minor and Design Plan Changes highlighted in greeQ .. The mylars wi 11 not be .returned. If the consultant engineer desires copies for his/her records, copies must be made before submittal. Mylars and blue-line drawings shall not have shading or adhesive additions in any areas. A'/!i[;~~!"b ,,,it:);.v' 'lilt_' 990.2 FINAL CORRECTED PLANS: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENil'S ONLY 1 Two (2) blue-line copies of the complete construction pJafi)~~'hs required. The plans must reflect all Minor and Design Plan Changes. The(f l~e-lhle~ 'rnl!st have all Minor and Design Plan Changes highlighted in green. The blue,lini.,drawings shall not have shading or adhesive additions in any areas. r. ~~ 996 FINAL CORRECTED PLANS, REPLAGEMENT MYfu\RS: '\ y When the originally approved mylar is not su6init'ted ~s•.th~FJNAL CORR_ECTED PLAN, additional review of the replacement myllir',ilill'be required. The Plan or "P" number from the original mylar sh<)!l be shown on the~~placement mylar. \,I?•,,,,, "<'~ ,1:il~·:.·.,·~ ''.'--.... ,/~ I 000 Inspector: TENZING THINLEY ~I~". ·<1 .. '1' ... ,;-..,·.·. . . Phqqe;;(206) 296-7038 ~. \ "''<,:11: '"·•,,. ) /' :;::i. -:-'''1f'·t,;l~. N' \:1. · ... '-. )i/" 1'·<~.·1 '''.ltt,cw·:' ,,, ,t . "'V S)~ • '"ill" ;' 11~:~ll' j/ Signature: .,,'.;' ... . , '. ·· .. ,1w;:ua,tf,, Y'J: J , ,, ..•. ,.,,.tti,, ii; J .. ' .. "' , ':-:'./' h: "IJ>~:~,., I rk>V-~~ ~,·· ··.· ~"-. ,Jl'I.\ ~~, ;.) "~··"'~''• l/ '"'-"';!'' \;L' t:rj;, l•Y ,j)/ Page 5 of5 Print Date: I 0/16/2007 (::ii;\ t.1'.illJ ~ ~ ,1,...)1\jp.i...... Affi16,,~ "TV ~ 'i"t"" ~ ~....i;, c>tJ ~o -o/L. • lo-r-A"'--OA.J lor? 8 rJ::. Cf -~ f5J::.. ~ f==i.ow1,v6.,. /""TD 1-h~ 'fNZ-o ( 4 v' ·nt--? ') ~~ ~ ~ ;pl4lo.Y;;,_, • • ' t • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ® King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Rathinam Short Plat Location: 11634 SE 192nd Street, Renton, WA 98075 Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? -~~~~-yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 ____ no For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: Segtember 27 ,2007 Project No.: L04S0003 Activity No.: Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet EROSibNlSl:blMENt CONTROL? Backfill & compaction-embankment ESC-1 Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 Crushed surfacing 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03.9(3) Ditching ESC-4 Excavation-bulk ESC-5 Fence, silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 Fence, Temporary (NGPE) ESC-7 Hydroseeding ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep ESC-10 SWDM 5.4.2.1 Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" ESC-12 Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" ESC-13 Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" ESC-14 Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes ESC-16 WSDOT 9-13.1 (2) Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 Sediment pond riser assembly ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 Sediment trap, 5' high berm ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway berm section ESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 Seeding, by hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 Sodding, 1" deep, level ground ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 TESC Supervisor ESC-25 Water truck, dust control ESC-26 SWDM 5.4.7 W-RiitE4N4TEMs••:BMfseetiiijesj It•••fttt•••t I Page 2 o/9 $ 5.62 CY $ 67.51 Each $ 85.45 CY $ 8.08 CY $ 1.50 CY $ 1.38 LF $ 1.38 LF $ 0.59 SY $ 1.45 SY $ 2.01 SY $ 0.53 SY $ 10.70 LF $ 16.10 LF $ 20.70 LF $ 2.30 SY $ 39.08 CY $ 1,464.34 Each $ 2,928.68 Each $ 1,949.38 Each $ 17.91 LF $ 68.54 LF $ 0.51 SY $ 6.03 SY $ 7.45 SY $ 74.75 HR I 0 $ I I Each ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: KC_ BON D-rathi nam.xl s Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes $ $ $ A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Backfill & Compaction-embankment GI -1 $ 5.62 Backfill & Compaction-trench GI -2 $ 8.53 Clear/Remove Brush, by hand GI -3 $ 0.36 Clearing/Grubbing/Tree Removal GI -4 $ 8,876.16 Excavation -bulk GI -5 $ 1.50 Excavation -Trench GI -6 $ 4.06 Fencing, cedar, 6' high Gl-7 $ 18.55 Fencing, chain link, vinyl coated, 6' hig GI -8 $ 13.44 Fencing, chain link, gate, vinyl coated, 21 GI -9 $ 1,271.81 Fencing, split rail, 3' high GI -10 $ 12.12 Fill & compact -common barrow GI -11 $ 22.57 Fill & compact -gravel base GI -1 $ 25.48 Fill & compact -screened topsoil GI -1: $ 37.85 Gabion, 12" deep, stone filled mesh GI -14 $ 54.31 Gabion, 18" deep, stone filled mesh GI -1! $ 74.85 Gabion, 36" deep, stone filled mesh GI -1 $ 132.48 Grading, fine, by hand GI -1: $ 2.02 Grading, fine, with grader GI -H $ 0.95 Monuments, 3' long GI -1S $ 135.13 Sensitive Areas Sign GI -2 $ 2'88 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground GI -21 $ 7.46 Surveying, line & grade GI -22 $ 788.26 Surveying, lot location/lines Gl-2' $ 1,556.64 Traffic control crew ( 2 flaggers ) Gl-24 $ 85.18 Trait, 4" chipped wood GI -25 $ 7.59 Trail, 4" crushed cinder GI -21 $ 8.33 Trail, 4" top course GI -2 $ 8.19 Wall, retaining, concrete GI -28 $ 44.16 ;wall, rockery GI -21 $ 9.49 Page 3 of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BONO.rathinam.xls CY CY SY Acre CY CY LF LF Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY Each Each SY Day Acre HR SY SY SY SF SF fttftfti:ttiUfi]ij$ii~\dJ{fatt Rlii!fui\;Mi<®~n Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ~;~~i~il&~1: Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet RoAtiiMPRbvsMeJiJt• ?E AC Grinding, 4' wide machine< 1000s AC Grinding, 4' wide machine 1000-200( RI -2 $ 5.75 SY AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000s, RI -3 $ 1.38 SY AC Removal/Disposal/Repair RI -4 $ 41.14 SY Barricade, type I RI -5 $ 30.03 LF Barricade, type Ill ( Permanent ) RI -6 $ 45.05 LF Curb & Gutter, rolled RI -7 $ 13.27 LF Curb & Gutter, vertical RI -8 $ 9.69 LF Curb and Gutter, demolition and dispos bRI -9 $ 13.58 LF Curb, extruded asphalt RI -10 $ 2.44 LF Curb, extruded concrete RI -11 $ 2.56 LF Sawcut, asphalt, 3" depth RI -1 $ 1.85 LF Sawcut, concrete, per 1" depth RI -1 $ 1-.69 LF Sealant, asphalt Rl-14 $ 0.99 LF Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit price RI -1! $ -SY Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick RI -1 $ 7.53 SY Sidewalk, 4" thick RI -1 $ 30.52 SY Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and dispos RI -11 $ 27.73 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick RI -19 $ 34.94 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick, demolition and dispos RI -20 $ 34.65 SY Sign, handicap RI -21 $ 85.28 Each Striping, per stall RI -2 $ 5.82 Each Striping, thermoplastic, ( for crosswalk RI -23 $ 2.38 SF Striping, 4" reflectorized line RI -24 $ 0.25 LF I 36o1 90.00 Page 4 of9 SUBTOTAL 90.00 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) add RS -1 $ AC Overlay, 1.5" AC RS -2 $ AC Overlay, 2" AC RS -3 $ AC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 $ AC Road, 2", 4" rock, Qty. over 2500S RS -5 $ AC Road, 3", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS -6 $ AC Road, 3", 4" rock, Qty. over 2500 S i'RS -7 $ AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY RS -8 $ AC Road, 5", Qty. Over 2500 SY RS -9 $ AC Road, 6", First 2500 SY RS -11 $ AC Road, 6", Qty. Over 2500 SY RS-1 1 $ Asphalt Treated Base, 4" thick RS -1 $ $ Gravel Road, 4" rock, Qty. over 2500 sl{s -14 $ $ PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY Rs -18 $ Thickened Edge RS-1,1 $ Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 3.60 7.39 8.75 17.24 13.36 19.69 15.81 14.57 13.94 16.76 16.12 9.21 11.41 7.53 21.51 21.87 6.89 SY SY I SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY LF 10001 7,390.00 ilJftIJ\i}I~f~MWM!ftlIIH!Il! ••tt\!!lji@lfuilt~®§?····· Page 5 of9 SUBTOTAL 7,390.0~ ·Kee 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ·:III!I\I\1:i!I]\I/1:/~l,mimmtf!II!!II}! ·•· fa• 'f!9i!i!:ll!ll'!:9¥iITTi~!\!~ ~~==~~== DRAINAGE {qi{~ ii i::~®i#l.\~#1~ P.ilii! ~!i~r ~~®~iiful) fo n ¥~/¢~i/l;~;;;~ ;i;;;;;;;;,;;i;i~'i%WiW£~ijii\;;/iiA~~/iii@i,@iffii¢!\iiiiil~~J;;~~~ ii;i/J ~iiik b Access Road, RID .. .. I D-1 i $ ;6 74 I SY I r ' I I I I I I Bollards -fixed D-2 $ 240.74 Bollards -removable D-3 $ 452.34 * (CBs include frame and lid) CB Type I I D-4 $ 1,257.64 D-5 $ 1,433.59 CB Type 11, 48" diameter D-6 $ 2,033.57 for additional depth over 4' D-7 $ 436.52 CB Type II, 54" diameter D-8 $ 2,192.54 D-9 $ 486.53 D-10 $ 2,351.52 for additional depth over 4' D-11 $ 536.54 CB Tvoe II, 72" diameter D-12 $ 3,212.64 for additional depth over 4' D-13 $ 692.21 Throuah-curb Inlet Framework (Add) D-14 $ 366.09 Cleanout, PVC, 4" D-15 $ 130.55 Cleanout, PVC, 6" D-16 $ 174.90 Cleanout, PVC, 8" D-17 $ 224.19 Culvert, PVC, 4" D-18 $ 8.64 Culvert, PVC, 6" D-19 $ 12.60 Culvert, PVC, 8" D-20 $ 13.33 Culvert, PVC, 12" D-21 $ 21.77 Culvert, CMP, 8" D-22 $ 17.25 Culvert, CMP, 12" D-23 $ 26.45 Culvert, CMP, 15" D-24 $ 32.73 Culvert, CMP, 18" D-25 $ 37.74 Culvert, CMP, 24" D-26 $ 53.33 Culvert, CMP, 30" D-27 $ 71.45 Culvert, CMP, 36" D-28 $ 112.11 Culvert, CMP, 48" D-29 $ 140.83 Culvert, CMP, 60" D-30 $ 235.45 Culvert, CMP. 72" D-31 $ 302.58 Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL ""KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Each Each Each Each Each FT Each FT Each FT Each FT Each Each Each Each LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF Check out the DOES Web site atwww.metrokc_qovlddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Culvert, Concrete, 8" D • 32 $ 21.02 Culvert, Concrete, 12" D • 33 $ 30.05 Culvert, Concrete, 15" D · 34 $ 37.34 Culvert, Concrete, 18" D · 35 $ 44.51 Culvert, Concrete, 24" D • 36 $ 61.07 Culvert, Concrete, 30" D-37 $ 104.18 Culvert, Concrete, 36" D-38 $ 137.63 Culvert, Concrete, 42" D-39 $ 158.42 Culvert, Concrete, 48" D • 40 $ 175.94 Culvert, CPP, 6" D-41 $ 10.70 Culvert, CPP, 8" D • 42 $ 16.10 Culvert, CPP, 12" D • 43 $ 20.70 Culvert, CPP, 15" D • 44 $ 23.00 Culvert, CPP, 18" D -45 $ 27.60 Culvert, CPP, 24" D-46 $ 36.80 Culvert, CPP, 30" D-47 $ 48.30 Culvert, CPP, 36" D-48 $ 55.20 Ditching D -49 $ 8.08 Flow Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) D · 50 $ 25.99 French Drain (3' depth) D · 51 $ 22.60 D · 52 $ 2.40 Infiltration pond testing D-53 $ 74.75 Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' dee D-54 $ 1,605.40 Pond Overflow Spillwav D -55 $ 14.01 Restrlctor/Oil Separator, 12" D · 56 $ 1,045.19 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" D • 57 $ 1,095.56 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 18" D · 58 $ 1,146.16 Rlprap, placed D • 59 $ 39.08 Tank End Reducer (36" diameter) D · 60 $ 1,000.50 Trash Rack, 12" D-61 $ 211.97 Trash Rack, 15" D • 62 $ 237.27 Trash Rack, 18" D • 63 $ 268.89 Trash Rack, 21" D • 64 $ 306.84 Page 7 of9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF CY LF LF SY HR Each SY Each Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each ~~11•11•~ II II·········· •tfi!!i\iti=~=~=················ Check out the DDES Web site atwww.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date• 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet No. 2" AC, 2" top course rock & 4" borrow PL -1 $ 15.84 SY 2" AC, 1.5" top course & 2.5" base cour PL -2 $ 17.24 SY 4" select borrow PL-3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" top course rock & 2.5" base cours1 PL -4 $ 11.41 SY Such as detention/water quality vaults t No. WI -1 Each WI -2 SY Wl-3 CY Wl-4 LF Wl-5 FT Wl-6 Wl-7 Wl-8 Wl-9 W1 -10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 8 of9 ~'·=~····· 7.480.00 2,244.00 9.724.00 B C *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Check out the ODES Web site atwww.metrokc.gov/ddes D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: Rathinam Short Plat Date: September 27 ,2007 PE Registration Number: 9470 Tel.#: 425-251-0665 Firm Name: Touma Engineering and Land Surveyors Address: 6632 S 191 st Place, Suite E102, Kent, WA 98032 Project No: L04S0003 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC} Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (A} (B} Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities! (C} Private Improvements (D} Calculated Quantity Completed $ $ $ $ PERFORMANCE BOND• AMOUNT 9,724.0 Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond·/ .. (First $7,500 of bond· shall be cash.) (A+B} $ 9,724.0 Performance Bond' Amount (A+B+C+D} = TOTAL (T} $ 9,724.0 Minimum bond" amount 1s $1000. Reduced Performance Bond* Total 0 * Maintenance/Defect Bond' Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND' REDUCTION: BOND• AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY ••• (E} $ T x 0.30 $ 2,917.2 OR (T-E} $ 9,724.0 Use larger of Tx30% or (T-E) Date: * NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. ** NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes.right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND• (B+C} x 0.25 = $ 2,431.0 The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% oontingency and mobilization costs are oomputed in this quantity . ..... NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shalt not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional pertormance bond shall be ! $ !(C+D}-E REQUIRED BOND' AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DDES Page 9 of9 KC_BOND-rathinam.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/08/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet @) KungGounty Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oa.k.esdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Rathinam Short Plat -BONDREDUCTION Location: 11634 SE 192nd Street Renton, WA 98075 .Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? ~~~~~~·yes lfyes, ForestPracticePermit Number: (RCW 16.09) Page,fof9 ,~ . ' . X no For alternate fonnats, call 206-296-6600. Date: 10/16/2007 Project No.: L04S0003 Activity No.: Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means,data adjusted for the Seattle area· or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. !EXPIRES: 6 / 10 '11614:011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04122/02 ReportDate: 10/16/2007 '. Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet . " ",. -,.,,,, -~-''"' f ' ~-~ .. ;;.«".e i;';.i;~·"<: r-1:;,.,. ·r -t,1t'o r':~14,-'' }."t'coc;.w,, l'=· ,,,.. 0-"ll1ec • ~ e-'"" _.., , "Unit , ;Qua_pWy.;;~ Applll:lltlons, ~ , ~~~}:)?¥"~:;, itr~::;}:~-~~~:.r;~. ~'(%';· ; $ 5.62 CY Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 Each Crushed surfacing 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03.9(3) $ 85.45 CY Ditching ESC-4 $ 8.08 CY 20 Excavation-bulk ESC-5 $ 1.50 CY Fence, silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ 1.38 LF 450 Fence, Temporary (NGPEl ESC-7 $ 1.38 LF Hydroseeding ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.59 SY 4800 Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 $ 1.45 SY _Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep IESC-10 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I $ 2,Q_1 I SY _Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep IESC-11 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I $ 0.53 I SY Piping, temporary, C_F'P, 6" IESC-12 I I$ 10.70 I LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" IESC-13 I I$ 16.10 I LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" IESC-14 I I$ 20.70 I LF Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged IESC-15 I SWDM 5.4.2.3 I $ 2.30 I SY Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes IESC-16 I WSDOT 9-13.1(2) I$ 39.08 I CY RockConwuction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 1,464.34 Each Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 2,928.68 Each Sediment pond riser assembly IESC-19 I SWDM 5.4.5.2 I $ 1,949.38 I Each Sediment trap, 5' high berm ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 17.91 LF 30 Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway _~rm section ESC~21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 68.54 LF Seeding, by hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY Soddinl!, 1" deep, level grouncl ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.03 SY Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground IESC-24 I SWDM 5.4.2.5 I $ 7.45 I SY 6 l-'-=.;c.;c.-"-"''-"-"-='--~~~~~~~~~-+=.c..;;;.-=--+-~~~~~~l-'-~-'-74~·.c..c.751 HR 8 Each Page 2 of 9 ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: --~ ,,·:·,.,,"!'""·"I $ $ $ 681/ 1621/ 6211/ 2a32I/ 1464l----' 5371/ 4491/ ~914.25 _;074:28 ~98853 A 11614.011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 10/16/2007 '• Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet . .,.. .;.,J 1 -,--. ,·4 .;~ 1, ··-.il,. • {;Qo,"' • _'r''A _.,,'., . ;,,'i"'fR'. . .. •"•?; ,'.,... ..,~,-· ~.;;_::_~~i-sting . ~:_-_· " , ,.,,._ -. {&_-_'.FUf_u_ re P1.i~_ ic -~. • . =--~ _ , , --~ Right-of4 Way; .,i· .• ~ ~~d l~provef!l!r-ts I c'-"-Iv --, ·· -, s -' ,;; & Drainage Facilities ... ·I -_-:,··--•• ~ ·-~~~f-'4,?·--.:~:_.~l-~ : ,. .: QUantity C:,Oh=ii:,le!ed ·.~:?( ;;1~Jfroye~_iits_ . ";~. j:~"'.\(Bond'ReduC1:iP!1): ~J>.%.· • -~ :Quallt. 1--~. . Unit~Prl~---Llnf auan~·:·f~I: .-Cost ... ~ .--. Quant. . Cost/•· . l;'.Ouant.-.1: GENERAL ITEMS . ~-}i -N ,,.,-,4....Jb.K . ..,.._;, Backfill & Compaction-embankment GI· 11 $ 5.62 Backfill & Compaction-trench GI -21 $ 8.53 Clear/Remove Brush, b_r hand GI -3 I $ 0.36 Clearin~Grubbing/Tree Removal Gl-41 $8,876.16 Excavation -bulk Gl-51 ! 1.50 Excavation -Trench Gl-61 ! 4.06 Fencing.!. cedar, r;; high GI· 71 $ 18.55 Fencing, chain link, vinyl coated, tr_!!!_nl Gl-81 ! 13.44 l:_encing, chain link, gate, vinyl coated, GI -9 I _!_1_,271.81 Fencing, split rail, 3' high GI -HJJ $ 12.12 Fill & compact -corrmon barrow Gl-111 $ 22.57 Fill & compact -gravel base Gl-121 $ 25.48 Fill & com_e.act -screened topsoil G1·13J$ 37.85 _Q;abion,_ 12· deep, stone filled mesh Gl-141$ 54.31 _Q;abion, 1s· deep, stone filled mesh Gl-151$ 74.85 Q;abion_, 36" def!P, __ stone filled mesh Gl-161 $ 132.48 Grading, fine, by hand Gl-171 $ 2.02 Grading, fine, with grader Gl-181 ! 0.95 Monuments, 3' lonQ Gl-191! 135.13 Sensitive Areas Sign GI· 20! $ 2.88 Sodding, 1· deep, sloped ground Gl-211 ! 7.46 Surveying_,_ line & grade GI· 221 $ 788.26 Surveying_,_ lot location/lines GI· 231 _!_1_,556.64 Traffic control crew ( 2 flaggers } Gl-241! 85.18 Trail.!. 4• chipped wood Gl-251 $ 7.59 Trail.!. 4• crushed cinder GI -261 $ 8.33 Trail, 4• top ??_Urse GI· 271 $ 8.19 !Wall, retaining, concrete GI -2ai $ 44.16 !Wall, rockery Gl-291 $ 9.49 Page 3of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls ._·; __ ~-,;_ 1'-· ----~ ft.\.,;,;.:•·:<'~· ... '' CY 100 562.00 500 _2,810.00 CY SY Acre 2.25 CY 400 600.00 CY LF LF 350 4,_704.00' Each 2 b_543.62 .!£. CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY 3000 2,850.00 Each 1 135.13 Each SY Day 2 1,576.52 Acre 2.25 HR I 8 681.441 161 _1,362.881 SY SY SY SF SF 1,243.44 16,582.15 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ~ -i:tcist .. ',, t· Crist ~ "'" 1 eo·rri.e_lete' _,') -. 'c\i'_,;,,-?.'-,·/:,',,/ 600 3,372.0 o/ 19,971.361 2.25 19,971.36 ~ 400 600.00 / 350 4,704.00 - 2 b_543.62 / 3000 2,sso.001- 1 135.131 ........ 2 1,576.52,- 3,502.44 2.25 3,502.44 24 __ 2,044.321-- 23.!.473.80 41,299.39 Unit prices updated: 02112/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 10/16/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet '-: -. Ii""' , I''·' -)~< -,:; ;..., ,-,· ,. ·I~';:, ... -'Ex-iitfllo:·,- . .. ,_;~~gJ1f:-ot-Y'°ay -ii.. -" .,,_-- '" _tl'iva!::. ')." 'V!P,.f~~ement_s .. . • ;, __ T . Cfriit Price·· 1 -Unit I ~Q~!lt~~~ .... COsf -2-:·f, .-_f-~ure P~~I-~ _ ~, ._.; ''{':& Road .~prov!;~nts ·& Orain"agE!-Ficilities·· cost~ . .,.._~1 ·Quant. ~--Cost ~auant:-· I ROAD lMl>_fWVEMENT ;,No: Lk"' IAC Grinding_,_ 4' wide machine < 1000s~ Rl-1 I! AC Grinding.!. 4' wide machine 1000-2001 RI -21 $ AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000sy I RI -3 [ $ AC Removal/Disposal/Repair Barricade, type I Barricade, type 111 (Permanent) !curb & Gutter, rolled RI-41 $ RI-5 I $ ~ RI-71 $ Curb & Gutter, vertical RI -8 $ Curb and Gutter_,_ demolition and dispo IRI -_9 $ Curb, extruded asphalt IRI -10J $ Curb, extruded concrete Sawcut, asphalt, 3• depth Sawcut.!. concrete, per 1· depth Rl-111 $ RI -12 $ RI -13 $ Sealant.!.asphalt IRI -141 $ Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit price 1 RI -15! $ ;shoulder, gravel, 4• thick Rl-161$ T ~. . __ ;ii 23.00 SY 5_75 SY 1.38 I SY 41-14 I SY 30.03 I LF 45.05 LF 13.27 LF 9.69 LF 13.58 LF 2.44 I LF 2.56 I LF 1.85 LF 1.69 LF 0.99 I LF SY 7.53 I SY :Si~~-'!-'a-lk! _4• thick RI -171 $ 30.52 I SY !Sidewalk, 4• thick, demolition and dispo4 RI -181 $ Sidewalk, 5• thick RI -19 $ Sidewalk, 5• thick, demolition and dispo RI -20 $ Sign.!. handicap !RI -21L! Striping.!. per stall RI -221 ! Striping, thermoplastic, ( for crosswalk 1 RI· 231 $ Stripin_g_, 4• reflectorized line RI -241 $ 27.73 I SY 34.941 SY 34.65 SY 85.28 I Each 5.82 I Each 2.38 f SF 0.25 I LF Page 4of9 SUBTOTAL i'f_: "•,{,{ r .:C. . ..:. 1100 6,325.00 280 2,713.20 360 666.00 360 356.40 250 7,630.00 -360 90.00 17,780.60 1 200 100 ,_ ~- 45.05 2,654.001 3,494.00 6,193.05 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes '"::,C' B0nd Reduction!. ..,,:~~ ~--Qua,h~-1 _ _. '_Com..e_lete,_ cOst .-(.'"" :'. 1100 1 200 280 360 360 250 100 6,325.001 / 45.051.,,.- 2,654.00I_,,.- 2,713.201- 666.00I/ 356.40L---- Z,630.00k 3,494.001 ....... 2~.883.65 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/16/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ,. ,, . -~]f ~ ~:-~·::~~~~!a~ ;1 . .. --:1.: :_ ~utu"reP_.u':~lic ... ~_,---;J,.:,::, .. !·~· Piivcl{'e ·. _;i~ofldRE!du_~ion* _ · R~i!-9 lmpr~v.efl1ents; . ~ · .., .Z,-"-• =- ;' . -~.t: , .. ~-, ' • ·Oh. . ' •· ~ · & Draina e.FacHities ··,~ _ _::, · -auilnf~::~ Cost}· ~·, ·aua·rit ~~i . :et " ,. I 'Onit Price I UnitA~~OUariLJ-z. · Cost- RO~SURFAGING· _;(ll' Ro~f 2.5 ba.0,0 & 1 s top;course}. ';For,!93 t~c"i16 ( a:s;'i~o;;k= 5'.l>as;. & 1,5'\top cou!!l.•L. '·::·.~~~".: For KCRS '93, additional 2.5• base ad RS -1 $ 3.60 SY AC Overiay, 1.5" AC RS -_2 _! 7.39 sv· 1000 _l,_390.00. AC Overlay, 2• AC RS -3 $ 6.75 SY AC Road, 2·, 4• rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 $ 17.24 SY AC Road, 2•, 4• rock, f"\h,_ over 2500SY RS-5 $ 13.36 SY AC Road, 3•, 4• rock, First 2500 SY RS-6 $ 19.69 SY AC Road, 3•, 4• rock, Qtv. over 2500 S' RS-7 $ 15.81 SY AC Road, s•, First 2500 SY RS-8 $ 14.57 SY AC Road, 5", Qtv. Over 2500 SY RS-9 $ 13.94 SY AC Road. 6", First 2500 SY as -1 $ 16.76 SY AC Road, 6", Dtv. Over 2500 SY RS-1 $ 16.12 SY !Asnhalt Treated Base, 4• thick RS-1 $ 9.21 SY Gravel Road, 4• rock, First 2500 SY RS-1 $ 11.41 SY Gravel Road, 4• rock, l"'\t,.,. over 2500 S 0 S-1 $ 7.53 SY PCC Road, s·. no base, over 2500 SY RS-1e $ 21.51 SY PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY >s-1 $ 21.87 SY , ' ' Thickened Edge ,s · 1 $ 6.89 LF I I I 3001 2,067.001 Page 5 of9 SUBTOTAL 7,390.00 _2,067.00 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes I .; ..w.-';-,";.;";<-, I 3001 2,067.00 2,067.0Q_ Unit prices updated: 02112/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 10/1612007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ,·:,-. .:>. • .-'' ~· ·-, -~r "'. ExistinQ> -.. ---FutLlreP.UbtiC··r <" Private : "--· _ BoridRedUction•·;, i .. ~ : -«. •. ,:.:· :Ii-· -' ·~: .· :~r:·-.;~ h . Rlglit~~f-~ay ,, ~'.;·~. "~-~~f1fopr~~erylint~. -~;.; : 'k' .-,~~rov~~e,i~-: -::~"' . ': •, ' _-.·1 ::~ .-..:_. ••• 1'...{ •• -·-"" , -· :t ~-.. ~ -·. ~ .'I &iOrainaae Facilities · ¥ ' ~Quant. -t. ,i_ __ · • . .,_"' "T., · ~ ~1t.Jifif Prici{:'.' · .'.tfiiit ~au8nt.· · _: · ,.,. ": co·st.:,c ~ aUSnf ··I'>.: .. :_ ... :·coit: __ ·· aiiani:r ii · -·~ ... eoSt· --"""-·eomclete ' .,,.. Cost : ~-· r' :,· '". ~-;"'-• .• ,., .. · _ .·, ··-« "-·· • "<< u, :,.~ ,. r;--.y • .,,,~ .. •. • -'"'°" :;i', <, ~ ,; ·-.. , ,,.. DRAINAGE (C_PP := CoffUga!et!·_Pla~ Pipe, N 1:?. o_r Eq!Jival&nt) . ·' for CUivert prides, Average of 4' covef was .isslltned. Assume·pert6rated PVC is same price as scil.id:J)ipe. ;, ' " Access Road, RID D -1 $ 16.74 SY 120 2,008.80 120 2,008.80_,,,. Bollards -fixed D -2 $ 240.74 Each "Z- Bollards -removable D -3 $ 452 .34 Each '[_ 3 1,357 .02 3 ,,.,. • (CBs indude frame and lid) CBT.,.....,, I D-4 $1,257.64 Each 4 5,030.56 4 5,030.56 8 10,061.12[__..... CB fvn<> IL D -5 $ 1,433.59 Each - CB T""""" II, 48" diameter. D -6 $ 2,033.57 Each 1 2,033.57 1 2,033.57 .,,- for additional deoth over 4' D -7 $ 436.52 FT CBT""""'ll.54.diameter D-8 $2,192.54 Each 1 2,192.54 1 2,192.54.....- for additional deoth over 4' D -9 $ 486.53 FT CB T" ..... II, 60" diameter D -10 $ 2,351.52 Each for additional deoth over 4' D -11 $ 536.54 FT CB Ty .... II, 72" diameter D -12 $ 3,212.64 Each for additional deoth over 4' D -13 $ 692.21 FT Throunh-curb Inlet Framework (Add) D -14 $ 366.09 Each Cleanout, PVC, 4• D -15 $ 130.55 Each Cleanout, PVC,6" D-16 $ 174.90 Each 6 1,049.40 6 1,049.40. / Cleanout, PVC, 5• D -17 $ 224.19 Each Culvert, PVC, 4• D -18 $ 8.64 LF Culvert, PVC, 6" D -19 $ 12.60 LF i Culvert, PVC, a• D -20 $ 13.33 LF Culvert,PVC,12• D-21 $ 21.77 LF Culvert. CMP, a• D -22 $ 17.25 LF Culvert, CMP. 12• D -23 $ 26.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 15~ D -24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert, CMP, 18• D -25 $ 37.74 LF Culvert, CMP. 24• D-26 $ 53.33 LF Culvert, CMP, 30• D -27 $ 71.45 LF Culvert,CMP.36• D-28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert, CMP, 45• D -29 $ 140.83 LF Culvert, CMP, so• 0-30 $ 235.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 72• D-31 $ 302.58 LF Page 6of9 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls SUBTOTAL ~030.56 !b_622.49 Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 1p49.40 18,702.45 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 10/1612007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet "~ jt' < ·, ·,. ,-;, j ,,,,~ "" ·:'?'.(E/<islirg . . ) ·., '_'-'''Future.fubliC-~1-'\{~:; .. '··'-' '':'."'.' ·~ ,;:;~~""'.!,.,.,1 ·~ ' . , 1 ~Ri9ht-'Ot~W3Y -. , ,";;··':"~·-,.;.;Y, ,:,,•· ••)'_;'~--• 'l ~ t:::l . Road'lmprovernents•, , . DRAINAGE CONTINUED . .,,,; ' -~;,;,_,.;:~ •• _-. ...,,:·,<' • .-., &·Orai~~ge F~ciiities' ~-· -;,;.; . • •.;;P ,, . --l""t·~:··, .. NO: , Unit Price .. .; · f-Onif Quant ~ ' ~--Cost -,: :.au'aht'' i · Cost.,._.· ~" Culvert, Concrete, a• 0-32 $ 21.02 LF Culvert, Concrete, 12· 0-33 $ 30.05 LF Culvert, Concrete, 15• 0-34 $ 37.34 LF Culvert, Concrete, 15• D-35 $ 44.51 LF Culvert, Concrete, 24" 0-36 $ 61.07 LF Culvert, Concrete, 30" 0-37 $ 104.18 LF Culvert, Concrete, 35• 0-38 $ 137.63 LF Culvert, Concrete, 42· 0-39 $ 158.42 LF Culvert, Concrete, 48• 0-40 $ 175.94 LF Culvert, CPP, 5' 0-41 $ 10.70 LF , / Culvert, CPP, s· 0-42 $ 16.10 LF Culvert, CPP, 12" 0-43 $ 20.70 LF 365 7555.5 313 6479.1 Culvert, CPP, 15" 0-44 $ 23.00 LF Culvert, CPP, 16" D-45 $ 27.60 LF Culvert, CPP, 24" 0-46 $ 36.80 LF Culvert, CPP, 30" D-47 $ 48.30 LF Culvert, CPP, 36" 0-48 $ 55.20 LF Ditchino 0-49 $ 8.08 CY Flow Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) 0-50 $ 25.99 LF French Drain (3' deoth) 0-51 $ 22.60 LF Geotextile, laid in trench, oolypropylene 0-52 $ 2.40 SY Infiltration pond testing 0-53 $ 74.75 HR Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' deeE 0-54 $ 1,605.40 Each Pond overflow S~ illway 0-55 $ 14.01 SY Restrictor/Oil Seoarator, 12" 0-56 $ 1,045.19 Each 1 1045.19 Resb'ictor/Oil Senarator, 15" 0-57 $ 1,095.56 Each Restrictor/Oil Seoarator, 18" 0-58 $1,146.16 Each Riprap, claced 0-59 $ 39.08 CY Tank End Reducer (36" diameter) 0-60 $ 1,000.50 Each Trash Rack, 12" D -61 $ 211.97 Each Trash Rack, 15" 0-62 $ 237.27 Each Trash Rack, 18" 0-63 $ 268.89 Each Trash Rack, 21" 0-64 $ 306.84 Each Page 7of9 SUBTOTAL 7555.5 7524.29 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ' -..'5" " Private' i-, ·. w er~ ;;J~prOvemenl/;t;~ ,..,.,.,,: ~~ . . . : auant: ,.. . Cost .--; ' fi;-"', Bond Reduction• , ' ', I :' ~ •) Quant. · • .-,,,;,"Gt" c~~[ lete Cost' 678 I/ 14034.f , 1 1045.1! 15079.79 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 10/16/2007 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet . cl. .-•;._ ' < ::. ... ~ ~~i~~t~~ } ;-j,f -F-~t~ri!_U~u~r--~~:~ /~~~~~J~: . /· ~-'":~~ ~ ·eo~~edUction* -:1··, ;'\c ~:/-.Ri9~,l;~{'=way · if.:. Ro_a. d£~~f!i¥.~~~nt.~".;-'.1,.-_ · " .. ,,/}~pr~~~nts . .·:.s:···,Ji,----."'"'',.C' ---~',,'"--l >~ f:,, ,. -t~i. f<:,"jl·"· _;,_;_·~~. -~' · ';,."•:-·:·. . 1&-0rain,:1ge:FaCilities · .;:"I:· ·. ::,::·-.~/ · {j,'"~ ..,., -• Quant."' ------JQUa(it.: · 'tt."1'f.,_~. Cost· _. :r-Com~l;t~ :r · I un, Pi1ce .. Unit 1· ~-Quant. PARKING l::OJSURF.ACING ·--:,,~; .' --"'·' .. No. 2· AC~ 2· top course rock & 4• borrow I PL -1 $ 15.84 SY 2• AC. 1.s• top course & 2.s• base coul PL -2 $ 17.24 SY 4• select borrow I PL -3 $ 4.55 SY 1.s•to.e_course rock& 2.S-base course I PL-4 $ 11.41 SY -... -IWRITE:11\1-ITEMS ., • · < ./,h :.ss"!." ""'··· - No. - WI -1 Each WI -2 SY WI· 3 CY I WI -4 LF WI -5 FT WI· 6 WI· 7 WI· 8 WI· 9 'NI-10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 8 of9 Price -, , -11:.-auant. · :, __ ... _Cost:.... _.-,-,. .,;-; ···--"' --·-· , -' - "2-<f I 'c>, Q'.)O .+ 15;ooO 39,000.10 9'1, 'tl!Y'r 44;98&.9S- 11,700.03 11 •mss 50,700, 13 1?..:J2j =- B C "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614.011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes '···z· ,f "I"'\ Cost -,,-t. ""--- 24,523.20 101,032.28 7,356.96 30,309.68 31,880.16 131,341,96 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 10116/2007 ·- Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: Hal P. Grubb Date: 10/17/2007 PE Registration Number: 23975 Tel.#: (425) 251-6222 Firm Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, In"° Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South Project No: L04S0003 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right-of-Way Improvements Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilitie Private Improvements Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond•r (First $7,500 of bond* shall be cash. Performance Bond• Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL Reduced Performance Bond* Total ... Maintenance/Defect Bond• Total - NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND" REDUCTION: PERFORMANCE BOND" AMOUNT (A) $ 8,988.5 (B) $ 50,700.1 (C) $ 77,qe,,;;;~7 (D) $ 31,880.2 (A+B) $ 59,688.7 (T) $ 1"1, Sf;°;/ 1!i9,9!i 4.§ Minimum bond* amount is $1000 BOND" AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY••• (E) $ 131,342.0 50,f;bb TX 0.30 $ C 4s.01s.3 " (T-E) $ 18,~ Use larger of Tx30% or-ff.,E.'. Hal P. Gru_bbJ'.E., Barghausen Engineers * NOTE: The word ·boner as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. ** NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. OR Date: PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND* (B+C)_x _ ;::: 0.25 -$ I 27,296.5 ' 17-0ct The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maxirn.Jm. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. *** NOTE: Per KCC 27A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY BONO RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional performance bond shall be I $ (40,976.1)j(C+D}-E REQUIRED BOND" AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of9 11614.011.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 10/16/2007 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov DA TE: / /-S:: -O J TO: t\, \U, (\ ~\ ...> ..5 Ptoject No. >= LOOXXX:XX SUBDIVISION and SHORT SUBDIVISION REQUEST TO RECORD Interoffice Memo Land Use Inspection Section RE: Project Name: --Lg____,_~a._+l'-=,__· ,_1,.,n"'a"-"""''----'---"-s::;...,h=· Lrf_,__,_l}_;".'.c....:"'~Tc.__ __ Project NO. : Final Activity No.: La <1-Sooo J L-07~!({)].J Inspection Activity No.: L 055/ t--Z.S Please inspect the above-referenced project for the following items: The Land Use Inspection Section does not recommend recording if any item is marked NO KCC 9.04.090(c): Are those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the control of flows discharging from the sites constructed and in operation, per public RID rule? $._ Yes __ No KCC 19A.08.160: I. · Water mains and hydrants installed? (must also be approved by Fire Marshall)? X Yes No 2. Roadways graded to all lots capable of providing access by passenger vehicles? _i,___ Yes No 3. Specific site improvements required by preliminary app10val installed? N/A Yes No 4. Sensitive area to remain undeveloped delineated? ,J/ A Yes No 5. Temporary control monuments set by Land Surveyor? ----2$,___ Yes No 6 All safety hazards addressed? 1Yes No GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I. There are no objections to the recording of the subdivision, and issuance of building permit§> -X--Yes No 2. Are there any building lots on this plat which should have further cview or engin,eering prior to building construction? If so, identify lots and desc_ribe concerns in comment section. 1'..0 3. Minhnum Performance Financial Guaranteerequired for recording s $ SD, 0C,,~. oo Cash or Assignment ofRmd Restoration Financial Guarantee may be used ifa Perfonnance Agreement to • I corgylete fonn is completed , j, NO'(f-: ,1t.,»f1 CA K ~ ~,;" F.6. ~O ?U--j.f._ic;..&w'-"1 ":\'\'f-1:\-I>'}. - 4 Mmhnum Landscapmg Financial Guarantee amount I cquired for rccordng IS (,$ .:l {'j ,;.<;<,, 5 Muumum Recreatwn Fmancia!Guarantee amount required for recording is $ '2.~,~ 3bb' ,,1~ 0 ,~ 6. MmlITium Street Trees Financial Guarantee amount required for recordmg,s $ 0 1 000 · O<::__ lJ Comments: bzo '.::>16",I\) 1 F1 ~ 7I?§g /?::--ptA::<-:§<A-GJJ: ,::;;,,zow, .J 6, ~~~~~~,~~~1,~o~~~~~~~J·~~~~o~v~cU~~~t~~DU~~~r~~d~§~~~~~v~~~~~~~.~ ' ~- Inspector's signature and date: Financial Guarantee Compliance Enginee_r Initials and date: , Engineering Review Section Original: Platting Engineer Copy I: FGMU Copy 2: Inspector Copy 3: BF Engineer S/Current Form.Present.Req-tRec.mem/ I 0.19 .0.7 CHARHOM-01 KAGE ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDDN\'YYI 10/24/2007 PRODUCER (425) 322-0999 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION American Insurance Associates, LLC ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR 9514 • 4th St NE, Suite 201 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Lake Stevens, WA 98258 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED Charter Homes, Inc. INSrnEHA· New Hampshire Insurance Company 601 Union Street OISUlER B Suite 5100 INSURER C Seattle, WA 98101 IN5URERD INSURERE: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMEITT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO v.JHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. l!'IJ.tl """ POLICY NUMBER P~_L!SY .. ~f.~~ POL EXPIRATION LIMITS ~NERAL LIABILITY EACH~RENCE • 1,000,000 A X X COMtlERCIAl GENERAL LIABILITY !02-LX-5453877-3 5/5/2007 5/5/2008 PREMtSESIEB occi,-meol • 100,000 -tJ CLAIMS fAAOE 0 OCClR 5,000 ~ EXP (Any ()llfl PerM>rl) • t-1,000,000 PERSONAL & Af)V INJLRV • -2,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE I t-2,DOO,DOO GEN'l AGGREGATE LIMIT Af>PLIES PER PRODUCTS. COMP/OP AGG I ·;,n POLICY n ~!!~ n LOC rvA Stop GAP 1,000,000 AUTOMOBLELIAB~ITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT -I ANY IIUTO (Eu accident) f--AlL O~D AUTOS BODILY \NJ.RV I SCHEDU..ED AIJTOS [Perpe~) ·- f-HlREOAUTOS OODIL Y INJJRY (Per ecciwr,I) • t-ON-0'Wr£D AUTOS ---PROPERlY DM'AGE • (Per ecc1dert) GARAGE LIABILITY AIJfO ONLY. EAACCIDE.Nf I qANYAUTO OTHER THAN VI /\CC ' AUTOOt>LY. AAG • EXCESS,UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE ' CJ ornR O WJMS ,_ AGGREGATE ' • Fl OEDI..CTlll.F. • RETENTION • • WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I #iv5TtW-.,. I jD,=1]}" EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY • ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIE)(ECUTIVF. E L 1:ACH ACCIDENT OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E L. DISEASE· EA EMPLOYEE I ~t~~11rsr~t0v~~~s bolcw EL. DISEASE. POLICY LIMIT • OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES/ EXCLUSIONS AOOEO BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS King County, Its appointed and elected officials and employees, are named as an addltlonal Insured with repects to llablllty relating to the construction or maintenance of 1he drainage faclllUes required by project #L04S003 per form CG 20 12; attached. This policy provides Insurance In the amounts and types of coverage required ln King County Code 09.04.100. CERTIFICATE HOLDER Department of Development and Envlromental Services ATTN: Financial Guarantee Management Unit 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ACORD 25 (2001/08) CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVe oescR1aeo POLICIES ee CANCELLED 6EFOREi THE EXPIRATION OATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3_0 __ CAYS WRITTEN ~IOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLOER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO 00 SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF AtN KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGEITTS OR REPRESENTATh/E9. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE - © ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ISO I Commercial General Liability Forms I 07/01/98 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 02-LX-5453877-3 CG 2012 07 98 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS -PERMITS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE State Or Political Subdivision: Department of Development and Environmental Services (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) Section 11-Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured any state or political subdivision shown in the Schedule, subject to the following provisions: 1. This insurance applies only with respect to operations performed by you or on your behalf for which the state or political subdivision has issued a permit. 2. This insurance does not apply to: a. "Bodily injury," "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of operations performed for the state or municipality; or b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" included within the "products-completed operations hazard". CG 20 12 07 98 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1997 ©ISO Properties, Inc. ©2004 Insurance Reference Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ti King County Road Services Division Department ofTre.neport.ation MS KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jacbon Street Seattle, WA 98104 October 9, 2007 TO: Mike Meins, Engineer II, DDES, Land Use Inspections Section Tenzing Thinley, Engineer II, DDES, Land Use Inspections Section FM: Linda Mott, Engineer III, Signal & Illumination Vi,@rton Posey, P.E., Traffic Systems Engineer RE: Rathinam Plat: SE 192nd Street east of 116th Avenue SE Approval to Attach Lighting on Frontage with Occupancy Permit In response to a request from Bob Thompson of Charter Homes, Inc., I have reviewed existing light levels and safety at the intersection of the Rathinam Plat access and SE 192nd Street. There are two existing luminaires directly across SE I92"d Street from the plat which provide adequate light levels for general safety. I believe the existing light levels are adequate for continued construction prior to the installation of the steel pole illumination system on the property frontage. We hereby authorize you to make the condition to install the steel pole illumination system a requirement of the Occupancy Permit. This will' allow Charter Homes, Inc. to continue building while the steel luminaire poles are manufactured and shipped to the site. Please let me know if you have questions or concerns. I can be reached at (206) 263-6140. NJP:LM/lm .. Page I of I Meins, Mike From: Mott, Linda Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:21 PM To: Bob Thompson; Thinley, Tenzing; Meins, Mike Cc: Posey, Norton Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat Illumination Bob, Tenzing and Mike -attached is a memo from Traffic Systems Unit Supervisor, Norton Posey and me regarding the illumination system for the Rathinam Short Plat. As indicated in the memo, we feel there is adequate illumination with the existing Juminaires on power poles to provide an acceptable level of safety until the steel pole system can be installed. The new system should be tied to the Occupancy Permit. Please Jet me know if you have questions. Linda Mott Engineer Ill, Signal & tllumination Design King County Dept. of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section 201 s. Jackson Street, KSC-TR-0222 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 263-6140 From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:08 AM To: Mott, Linda Subject: Rathanam Short Plat Illumination Good morning Linda, I am just following up on the voice mail I just left you. As you may recall after finding out we had missed installing two streetlights and a service cabinet on the north side of SE 192nd Street you and I met to discuss. Since the decision was made that we could not vary from the approved plan, my contract has done all the ground work for the installation of these lights. The hold up at this point is the poles are backordered until mid December. I believe the three lights installed on the south side of 192nd in a distance of approximately 300' would be enough to avoid a safety issue. While I agree that the streetlights are the responsibility of Charter Homes to install I would like to show the inspector, Mike Meins, and his supervisor, Steve Townsend, that to record without the lights installed on the north side of 192nd would pose no safety issue. Please call me on my cell phone (206-491-2719) to discuss this further. I am almost there and would like to resolve this last issue this week if at all possible. Thank you for all your help. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager ,. Charter Homes, Inc. z,. f ' ' 11/09/2007 ·, • Page I of3 Bob Thompson From: Thinley, Tenzing [Tenzing.Thinley@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:53 AM To: VanPatten, Steve Cc: Bob Thompson Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Steve: The req. to record form with West Creek had project #s etc same as Rathinam. I am sending the rejected form back to you, you can update them later. Thanks Tenzing Thinley, PE Engineer 11-DDES/LUIS Phone: 206-296-7038 Fax: 206-296-7174 From: VanPatten, Steve Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:38 AM To: Thinley, Tenzing Cc: 'Bob Thompson' Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003j -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Tenzing, Please verify the request to record form --I hope I didnt fat finger the names. There is a short plat called West Creek -L05S0011. Rathinam is L04S0003. Let me know if you need a corrected form? --thanks, Steve From: Thinley, Tenzing Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:30 AM To: 'Bob Thompson' Cc: Kara, Fatin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg; Mott, Linda; VanPatten, Steve; Townsend, Steve; Pray, Jeff Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob: This email is to address items that need to be completed prior to recording. 1.)As per emails below, DOT has directed you that illumination items can be bonded prior to recording. However, King County Code 19A.08.160 (http://www.metrokc.gov/council/code/22-Title%2019A.pd0 requires all safety issues addressed and the illumination plan is included as a safety requirement for pedestrian areas(KCRS 5.05). Any waiver to this requirement(example-a financial guarantee to be tied to the occupancy permit) will have to be approved by the Developement Engineer(Jim Sanders) not DOT. 11/2/2007 Page 2 of3 2)Verification that the pond, control structure and sd lines are built per plans by your Engineer or licensed surveyor. Provide dimensions and as built elevations at the inlets and outlets, corner stakes, overflow elev at control structure and overflow structure, surrounding berms and slopes. · 3) Water main and hydrant installation approval. 4)Temporary control monuments set by surveyor. 5) Tract B corners staked. 6) The site bond quantity work sheet you provided does not match the original. Submit bond quantity calcs that match original amounts. 7) The street tree bonds and landscaping bonds will be required as per approval letter. 8) The final plat map is currently being revised to address CL change etc. I will need to review final map prior to recording-to make sure it matches construction dwgs. The plat name on the "request to record" form is "West Creek" but the initial plat name provided is called "Rathinam". Update final plat name on recording maps. Note: if plat names are changed, the construction dwgs will also have to be changed prior to final approval(not required prior to recording). 9) Provide certificate of insurance as per http://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/l-info-drainins.pdf. This should have been in place since the preconstruction meeting. Thank you. Tenzing Thinley, PE Engineer 11-DDES/LUIS Phone: 206-296-7038 Fax: 206-296-7174 From: Mott, Linda Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:59 AM To: Bob Thompson; Thinley, Tenzing Cc: Kara, Fatin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob, My supervisor, Norton Posey, has directed me to advise you that the approved design must be followed and King County must own the system upon completion. As I understand it, the roadway serving the plat does not have the final lift, so you have the opportunity to complete the trench crossing and push under the sidewalks before this occurs. If the paving has taken place, you can push under the roadway as well, rather than open it up. As far as moving the time for completion of the illumination system out, discussions with DD ES/DOT Supervising Engineer Fatin Kara indicate that we can readily tie the illumination to the Occupancy Permit to give you time to secure an electrical contractor, procure the poles and build the system. I highly recommend contacting an electrical contractor as soon as possible since most vendors require 30 to 120 days to manufacture and ship the poles. To address your concerns regarding the service connection to PSE, the design can be modified to place the service cabinet on the west side of the driveway. We request that it be placed in a location that does not block visibility of 11/2/2007 • Page 3 of3 approaching vehicles. If you would like on-site direction regarding the cabinet placement, I can meet with you. I regret that I can not scale back the design to make it easier for you to complete. However, it is not in the County's (taxpayer's) best interest to do so. Please let me know if you have questions. Regards- Linda Mott Engineer Ill, Signal & Illumination Design King County Dept. of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section 201 S. Jackson St, KSC-TR-0222 Seattle, WA 98104 PH: (206) 263-6140 Tenzing, please note that Traffic agrees the illumination can be tied to the Occupancy Permit. Please let Mr. Thompson and I know that this change has been received and will be enforced by you (DDES). Thank you. Linda 11/2/2007 From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:20 AM To: Mott, Linda Subject: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Good morning Linda, I am checking to see if there is any progress in the illumination at Rathanam. I know you should not have to be doing this and I am sorry that I am making my problem your problem, but as we discussed in our meeting last Thursday the first issue is being able to associate the illumination with the Final Occupancy of the first home instead of the recording of the plat. Have you been able to get any answers for me? What ever information you can give me will help. Thank you very much, Bob Bob Thompson From: Sent: To: Subject: Bob Thompson Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:46 PM Thinley, Tenzing Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Page 1 of 1 Attachments: Rathinam Cert Letter.pdf; Rathinam calc.pdf; 11614-M-BQWS-Reduction-2007-10-16.pdf Good afternoon Tenzing, I have attached the BQW for bond reduction, pond certification letter and the pond calculations. If there are any other items you need please let me know. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Charter Homes, Inc. 206-491-2719 11/2/2007 ' ' ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 • Permit Number: Date Issued: Expiration Date: Permit Status: Construction Permit Permit Type, Subtype: FIREPERM, HYDRANT TIiie: CONTR: TBD Description: INSTALL WATERMAIN/1 HYDRANT Location: FD# 40 List of Parcels: 619840-0180 Site Address: 11634 SE 192ND ST KC Valuation: $0.00 Applicant Name: CHARTER HOMES Comments and Conditions 806F0155 04/03/2006 04/03/2007 ISSUED I. Work Subject to Approved Plans and Conditions. Work authorized by this pemlit is subject to the approved plans and corrections shown thereon and the attached conditions of permit approval. Failure to comply with all conditions once construction is begun may necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. 2. Posting on the job site. This pennit must be posted on the job site at all times in a visible and readily accessible location. 3. Scheduling Inspections. Inspection request~ for residential, connnerciaVmultifamily, and new construction fire permits may be scheduled by calling thc~DDES Voice Inspection Line at 1-888-546-7728. This request line is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for your convenience. Inspection requests must be called in prior to 3:00 pm, M-F to appear on the schedule for the following business day. Inspectors are available by phone M-F, 7:30 am to 8:30 am only at 206-296-6630. Scheduling and inspector availablility is subject to approved holidays. You may obtain inspection results by calling the DDES Voice Inspection Linc, reviewing the inspection infommtion left on site, or contacting the inspector of record. You may obtain general inspection infommtion M-F, 7:30 am to 4:30 pm at 206-296-6630. 4. Expiration. Please note the expiration date on this permit located in the upper right comer. A pennit may be extended or renewed in accordance with the King County Code only if a request to do so is received at least 30 days prior to the expiration date. 5. Compliance with State and Federal laws and the Endangered Species Act. The applicant is responsible for making a diligent inquiry regarding the need for concurrent state or federal pennits to engage in the work requested under this permit, and to obtain the required permits prior to issuance ofthis permit It_ is understood that the granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State or Local laws or regulations. In addition this pennit does not authorize the violation of regulations. In addition, the granting of this pemlit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set fortl, at 16 U.S.C. § 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the "take" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). It is the applicants sole responsibility to detcmunc whetl1er such ntake" restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this pemlit, and is precluded by Federal Law from w1dertaking work authorized by this pennit if that work would violate the "take" restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. § 1538, 50 C.F.R. §17.21, 50 C.F.R. §17.31, 50 C.F.R. §223 and 50 C.F.R. §224. 6. Fees due: Enforcement. The King County Code states that fees associated with the review and inspection of projects requiring pennit applications are due at the time of application for service, or within fifteen days of receipt of an invoice from King County's Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) stating that currently hourly rates are due. DDES may require a deposit of between twenty to eighty percent of the total cost of the review and inspection of a permit application at the time of application. Failure to pay fees in a timely manner is a civil violation. It is King County's policy to take enforcement action including, but not limited to, the issuance of a Notice and Order and/or Stop Work Order, when an applicant has violated the King County Code by failing to pay fees when due. By accepting issuance of tlus pennit, the applicant acknowledges that if he/she fails to pay fees when due, DDES may bring a code enforcement action to recover unpaid fees. 10/26/2004 BP_PRMCARD n ® King County Permit Number: B06F0155 Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 inspection, Record! Card •', ,•. I Commercial & Fire Inspection 24-Hour Request Line 1-888-546-7728 Note: Approved plans and this Inspection Residential Inspection 1-888-546-7728 Rocord Card must be on the Job slto General Inspection Information (206) 296-6630 1,:;,,, 2 :w -for all roquested inspections. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION APPROVALS: (followed by Inspection codes for use with the DOES Voice Inspection Line) 1.Foundatlon __ Footings (086) __ Walls (089) 2. Under Floor (300) By: ______ _ J. Exterior Shear (200) By:. ______ _ 7. _______ _ By: ______ _ 4. OK to Enclose Framing (090) By.:_-----~ 8. Final • (075) By: ______ _ ALL PERMITS: a) Responsibility for the building's oompliance with the provisions of Iha applicable King County Codes and for maintenance of the building rests exclusively with the permit applicants and !hair agents and the property owners. b) King County's inspection of lhe building and real property are spot checks designed to foster and encourage compliance with the applicable codes. Neither the approvals above nor the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy guarantees or assures compliance with all applicable codes. c) The owne~s copy of any applicable manufacturer's installation instnuctions shall be available to the inspector at the time of Inspection. *SINGLE FAMILY PERMITS: Permission to occupy structures for residential use is authorized upon approval of inspection number 8 (Final). COMMERCIAL/MUL Tl-FAMILY PERMITS: No occupancy of commercial or multi-family structures is permited until a separate "Certificate of Occupancy" has been issued. 11/1512004 BP_PRMCARD - "King County Departm<nt of Development and Environmental Services 90Q .Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: ff!. -.f':-0 7 Q,. • ,--, TO: '-"" Z, I Pro~ fl\lo. >=L,o~- soso1v1s10N and--•SHO~TS09[;)l:\Z.f$ION REQUE;ST TO RE(}ORD Interoffice Memo Land Use fuspection Section RE: Project Name:I.L"-"'-L.:.-"'.:_o_:c...c,..-,.:.:"'-"-~'-'-C/c..0-T'-c--::,--Project No.: LO 1-S O O O 5 /Q_ (A_ ft,,,·~ s;~ +: ~ /(vf---Project name as shown on recording document: Final Activity No.: __ l_0_7_F.~J?_-_Q_3~S-~--- .. ---CS"-·~~~,,,..\\~ l) \, fuspection Activity No.: LO> S' I I ;2. 8 --u· ~1' )~e~rcirc'ed,proJect for the following ,terns: I~ ?,,., \ ~~,J.ali'i'f~spection Section does not recommend recording if any item is marked No ~;· L KCC 9.04.090(c): Are those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the control of flows discharging from the sites·constructed and ·m opera~on. per publ,icR/D rule? __ Yes _V_N Nno. __ NIA 2. , Are water mains and hydrants installed? (mnst also be approvea£y Fire Marshall) . . · ~ Yes _V_NNco_ _ __ .NIA 3. Are roadways graded to all lots capable 'ofprovvefng access by passenger vehicles? . ___ VTus _·_No 4. Are specific site improVements required by prelimiDary appr~ installed?. . ___ Yes · __ No NIA 5. Is SeJllljtive acea to remain undeveloped delineated? Yes ~A No 6. Is temporary control monuments set by Land Swveyor? Yes NIA 7. ke all safety hazards addressed? Yes 8. Do-you.recommend tlie recording of this subdivisio~? If you hav~cked No, indicate the reason(s) in the comments s_ection below. __ Yes ---.lL'.' No . · .. 9. If there any building lots on this plat which should.have further review or engineering prior to building construction, identify ti\ose lots in the comment section below and describe concerns along with suggested final plat note( s ). I 0. Minimum Performance Financial Guarantee required for recording is $ -,....., f ~ Restoration Financial Guarantee may be used if a Perfonpance Agreement to Complete form is completed. 11. Minimum_ Landscaping Financial Guarantee acnount required for recording is: $ ---------- 12. Mimmum Recreation Financial Guarantee acnount required for recording is: $ ---------- 13. ~.Street Trees Financial Guanuitee amo1:10t-required for recording is: $ ---------- ~O~-'~-: s~ d:t~ ~ ~ to(s/o']-b ----1:5.ab. ', (Wo!'VI p x?".' , I Inspector's signature and date: Project Manager's signature and date: • Engineering Review Section S/FonnsJCURRENTFORMS.ReqtoRec.Presont.03.09.05 Original: Platting Engineer Copy 1:FGMU Copy 2: Inspector .. Page I of2 Thinley, Tenzing From: Thinley, Tenzing Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:30 AM To: 'Bob Thompson' Cc: Kara, Fatin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg; Mott, Linda; Steve VanPatten; Steve Townsend; Jeff Pray Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob:· This email is to address items that need to be completed prior to recording. 1.)As per emails below, DOT has directed you that illumination items can be bonded prior to recording. However, King County Code 19A.08.160 (http://www.metrokc.gov/council/code/22-Title%2019A.Qgf) requires all safety issues addressed and the illumination plan is included as a safety requirement for pedestrian areas(KCRS 5.05). Any waiver to this requirement(example-a financial guarantee to be tied to the occupancy permit) will have to be approved by the Developement Engineer(Jim Sanders) not DOT. ~0 1,._j, r-JdT" Poc..6_s ~erification that the pond, control structure and sd lines are built per plans by your Engineer or licensed surveyor. ,_,Rrovide dimensions and as built elevations at the inle};\,~nd outlets, corner stakes, overflow elev at control structure and overflow structure, surrounding berms and slopes. U!!-- ~ter main and hydrant installati~n approvalO(L- 4 )Temporary control monuments set by surveyor. -tvo-r /;..} 5) Tract B corners staked. -}...):,-r' ~.;:) 6) The site bond quantity work sheet you provided does not match the original. Submit bond quantity calcs that match original amounts. 7) The street tree bonds and landscaping bonds will be required as per approval letter. 8) The final plat map is currently being revised to address CL change etc. I will need to review fina~ap prior to recording- to make sure it matches construction dwgs. The plat name on the "request to record" form is "West Creel(" but the initial plat name provided is called "Rathinam". Update final plat name on recording maps. Note: if plat names are changed, the construction dwgs wil_l also have to be changed prior to final approval(not required prior to recording). 9) Provide certificate-orinsurance-a§ per httg://www .. metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/l-info-drainins.Qdf. This should have been in place since the preconstruction meeting. Thank you. Tenzing Thinley, PE Engineer 11-DDES/LUIS Phone: 206-296-7038 Fax: 206-296-717 4 From: Mott, Linda Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:59 AM To: Bob Thompson; Thinley, Tenzing 10/08/2007 .... ,,~;, ... ·-··'" ,~---·~·""· .. ,, .. r , .. ; Page 2 of2 Cc: Kara, Fatin; Posey, Norton; Langley, Kristen; Kinney, Greg Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) -SE 192nd St east of 116th Ave SE Bob, My supervisor, Norton Posey, has directed me to advise you that the approved design must be followed and King County must own the svstem upon completion. As I understand it, the roadway serving the plat does not have the final lift, so you have the opportunity to complete the trench crossing and push under the sidewalks before this occurs. If the paving has taken place, you can push under the roadway as well, rather than open it up. As far as moving the time for completion of the illumination system out, discussions with DD ES/DOT Supervising Engineer Farin Kara indicate that we can readily tie the illumination to the Occupancy Permit to give you time to secure an electrical contractor, procure the poles and build the system. I highly recommend contacting an electrical contractor as soon as possible since most vendors require 30 to 120 days to manufacture and ship the poles. To address your concerns regarding the service connection to PSE, the design can be modified to place the service cabinet on the west side of the driveway. We request that it be placed in a location that does not block visibility of approaching vehicles. If you would like on-site direction regarding the cabinet placement, I can meet with you. I regret that I can not scale back the design to make it easier for you to complete. However, it is not in the County's (taxpayer's) best interest to do so. Please let me know if you have questions_. Regards - Linda Mott Engineer Ill, Signal & Illumination Design King County Dept. of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section 201 S. Jackson St, KSC·TR·0222 Seattle, WA 98104 PH: (206) 263-6140 Tenzing, please note that Traffic agrees the illumination can be tied to the Occupancy Permit. Please let Mr. Thompson and I know that this change has been received and will be enforced by you (DDES). Thank you. Linda l 0/08/2007 From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:20 AM To: Mott, Linda Subject: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) Good morning Linda, I am checking to see if there is any progress in the illumination at Rathanam. I know you should not have to be doing this and I am sorry that I am making my problem your problem, but as we discussed in our meeting last Thursday the first issue is being able to associate the illumination with the Final Occupancy of the first home instead of the recording of the plat. Have you been able to get any answers for me? What ever information you can give me will help. Thank you very much, Bob -· .... _,., ,~.~.. ·-'···n~-----··~·-· ----·. ,.~ tfAi·LS '&Ji OF THE aw. 1/4 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST , / R SURFACE T-41 ' l~=../-.,=~-t---==~~ J5 Lf 12· SO I o J.2oss 1 12' GRAVEL POND ,.)\.,,' . / I I I I / / 10 LF 12" SO //~~11). w I }G-~ f e,) /t,eu ~€ 1 Mlf ID ' . -~ I~ /1,..-IJV-U. fv· ( - JAILHO\ ~~ • ca~~IYDOW~ FASTEN CHAIN . TO FRAME OVERFLOW ELEVATION fO PRoVIDE OEiENTION "- ANO OIL SEPARATION EL=501.00 PIPE SUPPORT ......_ ~ •· ' ...... t. I. I. ...... :z::r::r: ...... 000 .. oo -N ;;;3 ---NNN NNN ltt'fM,wi.e:m 1:=11r5 boi->e. ~~ ~~-,-~~~~~ 0~ ~~~~~~~~~ :: < IE 01.1.r ,, • • ·1 . . MORE INFORMATION FOR THIS HOME AVAILABLE AT JOHNLSCOTT.COM/15215 Lisa Angell 253-208-0528 429 29th Street NE Puyallup, WA 98372 Phone: 253-208-0528 Fax: 253-841-0118 Email: lisaangell@johnlscott.com • 4 Bedrooms Including Large Master w / Hugh Walk-in Closet • 2 1/2 Baths Including Master Bath w / Soaking Tub • Large Bonus Room • Top of the Line Appliances (Practically New!) • Granite Counters / Backsplash • Lofted Den • 2 Marble Surround Fireplaces •Slate & Hardwood Floors • New Carpet • Security System • Lush Landscaping & Much, Much Morel! • Offered at $383,000 • MLS #23 158850 ,Sohn 1.icotf REAL EST ATI: Page I of I Thinley, Tenzing From: Robert Bale [rgbale@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:37 PM To: Thinley, Tenzing Subject: Retention Pond Attached are the copy of the e-mail and Letter I sent to Charter homes in regards to the retention pond that is located at SE 192nd St and I 18th Ave SE. I can be contacted at 206-510-8989 Thank You and have a great day! ! ! ! R.G. "Rob" Bale/ John L. Scott Real Estate l-800-992-7958 Fax 253-852-4535 Web site -http://www.rbale.com e-mail-mailto:rob@rbale.com Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top_Cars by "Green Rating~ at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 07/10/2007 ' Prior to September_ I talked to Larry Krueger from Cramer Northwest Inc. -He was doing a down stream drainage analysis concerning the property being developed where the pond is now. I told him my concerns about the drainage onto my property. He said that "they were aware ofit now and would have to be addressed". I assumed that I would be contacted in regards to it by the developer. 9/1/06 -9/30/06 September -Talked with Jeff (Archer Construction) when the Pond was being put in. The crew was trying to figure out why the fallout basin didn't look right. -Jeff said the fall out basin didn't look right. It seemed to high to him. They checked the drawings several times and said everything was placed where it should be. The thing that stood out the most was the jailhouse window was well above the ground level. The edge of the pond is a foot above my ground level. -They checked the storm drain grade. The storm drain water moves east from the catch basin to the storm drain (at end of my side walk). They would not be able to use the existing drain because it was much higher than the fall out basin at the pond. They called and explained the situation to their office. They told me that they would have to dig up the existing storm drain form my mail box to the new storm drain near the water hydrant on the south west corner of my property. 10/3Q/06 -11/3/06 They removed the existing storm drain and replaced it at a lower level. They asked them to replace the yard drains that the county and put in for me when they installed the original storm drain. They put one in at west end of property. The new catch basin in much higher than my yard. My concern is what happens when there is a hard rain? Where will all the surface water go if it runs into the pond or East to my property from the elevated property with situation now? 11/7/06 Shot laser for height of pond water and out fall from pond. According to measurements, my drain field could be submerged before the water in the pond reaches the out fall tube to be conveyed away from the pond. See attached drawing/s. see attached pictures. 11/9/06 -Called Jim Hudson with Charter homes LMTCB -Jim Hudson called back. -I explained my concerns. He said Jeff had mentioned it to him, he felt that it was a valid concern. He said they needed to get surveyor and engineers together to address the situation. -We decided Friday 11/10 we would meet and discuss situation. 11-10-06 Archer was here early putting in connector to street storm drain from pond catch basin. They also hung bags of rock or sand over the outfall tube. I guess they want to get the outfall tube closer to water level. The rocks were hung around the outfall tube the day after I talked to Jim Hutson Did not get a call back from Jim Hutson. 11-13-06 Received message from Jim Hudson that we need to touch base. 11-14-06 I returned call and LMTCB /11for111atio11 on the above portion of this letter was sent to Jim Hutso11 at Clwrter Homes after the pond was built. I have received ,w contact from Charter Homes in regards to my letters or e-mails or last phone call. Attached are pictures of standing water on my property from the property east side of pond. 6/10 -6/15/07 The pond has been surrounded by this so called safety fence to the right when the pond was built. The fence was cut open by the contractor to work on the pond. It was like this from the Fall Of 2006 until June of 2007. New fence was being put in around pond. I asked about inserting slats in fence to give us back some of our privacy. The fence contractor (S & J Fencing Tenino WA) didn't seem think there was any problem with that and that he would install them. Mark from charter homes came by while I was talking with the fencing contractor. He said that installing the slats in the fence would have to be approved by the county. The pond was pump out to check for survey for right size. They put rocks around the inlet and the outfall tube as pictured here. There is still a bag of rocks laying on the ground that was holding the outfall tube down. I asked Mark about the lack of contact from Jim Hutson at Charter Homes. I explained the situation to him. He told me that he would let Jim Hutson know about it. It seems to me that most everyone is playing the "that's not my Joo" game. Water hydrant area was finished of with cement. I noticed that the original meets and bound marker had been removed from near the hydrant. · Rock put over pipe on outfall basin. 6/24 -6/30/07 Called Reagan Dunn's office and left a message to call me back. 7/1 -7/7/7 Called King County Councilman Reagan Dunn's office again and talked to his assistant, JP Morgan.JP referred me to Ve Et. I explained the details to Ve Et. He said that he would pass the information via e-mail or letter to Tenzing Thinley at DDES and those who would need to be involved. I told Ve Et that he was the first person to actually listen to us about our concerns. J.P. sent an e-mail regarding our conversation Mr. Thinley called me about our concern the following. I explained that I had sent e-mails, registered letters and had conversation with Jim Hutson. There seemed to be little concern for our situation. Tenzing said that the retention pond had not been approved yet. The approval must be done before they will issue building permits. He said he was going to come out and look at the pond and make sure that it was built as required. He asked me to send a copy of the letter I had sent to Charter homes No one has talked to us about any tvpe of drainage to address our concerns (paragraph #1) E-mail sent 2-6-07 Charter Homes/ Jim Hutson: 2/6/2007 Several months ago you and I had talked about the situation with retention pond water and the potential problem with my septic drain field. I talked with Larry Krueger Cramer Northwest Inc. prior to the property being developed. He was doing the down stream drainage evaluation. I told him about the huge amount of fill that had been put on the property west of ours. He told me that the property had been red tagged sometime ago because of the fill. We discussed the potential drainage problem I could have if the dirt was left at that level. He told me that he now aware of it and that would have to be addressed along with drainage along the west side of my property. This is a picture of the fill prior to starting of excavation for the retention pond. All the fill and dirt removed from the pond area and excess fill was spread over the rest of the property. This was and is my big concern for water runoff on to my property. Talked with Jeff from Archer construction when the initial grade work for the property and pond was starting. The crew was trying to figure out why it didn't look right. Jeff said the fall out basin didn't look right. It seemed too high to him. They checked the drawings several times and said everything was placed where it should be according to the drawings. I told them that I could have a problem with the height of the pond and fallout basin. - The thing that stood out the most was the jailhouse window was at near ground level. The edge of the pond is about one foot above my ground level. This was a concern of the crew. The edge of the pond is higher than our yard by about a foot. These posts are the same length. One was put on each side of the barrier They told me that they would have to dig up the existing storm drain form my mail box to the new storm drain near the water hydrant on the south west corner of my property. This was done to be able to convey the water from the pond They checked the storm drain grade. The storm drain water moves east from the catch basin to the storm drain (at end of my side walk). They would not be able to use the existing drain because it was much higher than the fall out basin tube at the pond 10/30/06 -11 /3/06 the existing storm drain was replaced at a lower level. I asked them to replace the yard drains that the county and put in for me when they installed the original storm drain. They put one in at west end of property near the hydrant. The new catch basin in much higher than my yard. My concern is what happens when there is a hard rain? Where will all the surface water go if it runs into the pond or west to my property from the elevated properties with situation now? 11/7/06 -Below is what happens every time it rains. The water run off from the property west of us collects in my yard. It has no place to go except to saturate the soil on my property. I was told that the water would run to the pond 11/7/06 --Shot laser for height of pond water and out fall from pond. According to measurements, my drain field will be submerged before the water in the pond reaches the out fall tube to be conveyed away from the pond. 0 • 11/9/06 -Called Jim Hutson with Charter homes Left Message Too Call Back -Jim called back. -I explained my concerns to Jim. He said Jeff had talked it to him. He felt that it was a valid concern. He said they needed to get surveyor and engineers together to address the situation. -We decided 11/10 we would meet and discuss situation. 6. Friday -Archer was here early putting in connector to street storm drain from pond catch basin. They Also hung bags of rock or sand over the outfall tube. I guess they want to get the outfall tube closer to water level. This does not address the situation of pond water level and my drain field level. No one contacted me on the 101 " as to my concerns. The red marker on the line is @ the depth of our drain field. The markers on the line are approx. 6" apart. This was my concern before the pond had any run off to it. I brought to the attention your excavation crew which in turn brought it to your attention. Why did they tie heavy weights around the pipe? These pictures were all taken on the same day. I called Charter homes office -left message for Jim Hutson to call back. Did not receive a return call back. 11-13-06 Monday -Received message from Jim Hudson that we need to touch base. 11-14-06 -I returned call and LMTCB 11-20-06 -Checked fall out basin and there was no water moving into the pipe or through it. When ever it got to this level is when we could tell by the way our systems would drain. The above pictures show the water at the outfall pipe entry. This is when we started to notice the septic odor in our home. The water still has to rise 2 -3 inches to be moving out of the pond. This happened several times this past season when it rained. It took several days for the problem to correct itself. 2007 ---------- 1-29-07 Work was being done on grade work 2-1-07 Called Charter Homes office and got Jim's e-mail address. -We are getting very concerned about the situation at the west side of our property. 1. Why was the fallout tube weighted down if the plans were followed and the detention ponds and water conveyance were where they were supposed to be? . ' ' - 2. A big pool of water sat around the fire hydrant area. It has never been able to run into the storm drain at street level. 3. The orange barrier fence was taken down so they could dig the pond right to the very edge of my property, leaving large opening in it behind our swing set. 4. How is the pond going to be landscaped at our properties edge.? Our drain system has backed up several times since the detention pond work was done. 5. What kind of landscaping and fencing will be used between our property and the pond? 6. What kind of fencing is going to be used between the properties? We need to address these concerns which have the potential of becoming very serious problems. Was there any discussion about the down stream analysis that had been done. Robert G Bale 253-859-2338 -Office 206-510-8989 -Cell .. ~ Bob Eddy King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055-12 l 9 CIVIL El'IIGINl;ERING, LAND PLANNING. SUHVEY!NG. ENVll'iONMENTAL SERVICES October 16, 2007 HAND DELNERY RE: Detention and Wet Pond As-Built Certification Rathinam Shmt Plat King County Project No. L04SR077 Our Job No. 11614 Dear Bob: At your request, I have prepared a certification letter and supporting calculations verifying the as-built condition of the wet pond and detention pond facility for the Rathinam Short Plat. This has been evaluated in accordance with King County Public Rule, Chapter 9-04. The following are the results of my analysis: 1. The dimensions and elevations of the as-built pond facilities meet the approved design plans. 2. The required and actual volumes of the as-built wet pond and detention facility are shown on the enclosed sheet. This facility meets the design plans. 3. 111e as-built elevations for the facility, including the top of pond and maximum water surface elevation, as well as bottom elevations, meet the design plans and are shown on the enclosed sheet. 4. The wet pond and detention facility have been constructed in the area as shown on the approved construction plans. Please review the enclosed calculations sununary sheet showing that the volume of the water quality and detention facility far exceed the volume shown on the approved construction drawi11gs; therefore, the facility should be approved as constructed. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at this office. Thank you. I 1614C.021 Respectfully,, J • . ~v~ Cara M. Visintainer, P.E. Project Engineer enc: Detention and Wet Pond Summary Calculations Sheet cc: Bob Thompson, Charter Homes (w/enc) Hal Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 9B032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX 8RANCH OFFICES t OLYMPIA, WA t TACOMA, WA t SACRAMENTO, CA t TEMECULA CA www.barghausen.com As-Built Detention and Wet Pond Facility Calculations for Rathinam Short Plat King County Project No. L04SR077 Our Job No. 11614 Stormwater Facility Summary As-Built Item As-Constructed Overflow Elevation 501.34 Top of Pond Elevation 502.00 100-Year Water Surface Elevation 500.95 Detention Pond Volume 17,256 CF Wet Pond Volume 11,792 CF Wet Pond Volume Calculations Elevation Area (SF) 494.20 1,904 496.00 2,960 497.95 4,644 Detention Pond Volume Calculations Elevation Area (SF) 497.95 4,644 498.00 4,652 500.00 6,144 500.95 6,967 Design 501.00 502.00 501.00 16,100 CF 6,478 CF Volume (CF) 0 4,378 11,792 Volume (CF) 0 232 11,028 17,256 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 28, 2005 Ivana Halvorson Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215-72"d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 " ' , ·'" RE: Revised Design for the Preliminazy Short Plat for the Rathinam Property DDES Project No. L04S0003, Activity No. L05RE025 Dear Ms. Halvorson: The Subdivision Technical Committee of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has reviewed your client's proposed modification to the design for the preliminary short plat of the Rathinam Property. The Committee has concluded this re-design does not contain "any substantial changes," as referenced in KCC 19A.12.060A. Therefore, based on this finding, approval is granted to the revised preliminary short plat received October 6, 2005, subject to the original conditions of approval issued September 17, 2004 (except as modified below), and the following condition. A right-of-way width of 32 feet shall be provided for the on-site road (Road A). Due to the changes tu the preliminary short plat design which are reflected on the October 6, 2005 submittal, the following conditions from the September 17, 2004 LUSD approval of the preliminary short plat are no longer applicable: JD, 3F, 3G, 3M1, 3M2, 6B, and 7B. The lead-in paragraph of Condition 7E is also revised to read as follows: The 4 500 sqttore feot recreatioa tract configuration of Tract A is consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A. l 4.190. Recreation improvements shall be provided in Tract A consistent with KCC ZlA.14.180 and .190 (ice, e.g., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). ,,, • Revised Design for the ~inary Short Plat for the Rathinam Pr'ty October 28, 2005 Page 2 of2 ·~ " Enclosed is a copy of the approved, revised, preliminary short plat design for your records. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 296-6632. Lanny Henoch, Planner II Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosure cc: Sharmila Rathinam, owner Erik Wicklund, Charter Homes, Inc. Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w / encl. Pat Simmons, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w / encl. Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w/encl. Joanne Carlson, Administrative Specialist II, Engineering Review Section, w / encl. I<im Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD File No. L04S0003 '~ . /t ' .. ' ® Departmeru of Development and Environmental Services · Land Use Services Division !N]oiice of Decision 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest ·Renton, Washington 980$5·1219 Appeal Procedure: (Type 2) Except for shoreline pennits which are appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings Board, this decision may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on October 4, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing foe of$250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also.file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on October 11, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: I) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope. of an appeal shall be based· on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted.to the Department ofDevelopmertt and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: September 17. 2004 Date Mailed DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Ifyou have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the DDES Planner at the telephone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audiocassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). · P96\epre\Nocice of t>ociaion.TypcJ.doc ?/21/99 clc '' . \' . ~--· ~- KING COUNTY • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 REPORT AND DECISION SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L04S0003 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: This is a short subdivision of 2.2 acres into 9 lots for detached single-family dwellings in the R-6 zone. The proposed density is six dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 16,427 square feet to 5,690 square feet. Please see Attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: C. Owner/Applicant: Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: .Fire District: · School District: Sharmila Rathinam 24006 SE 101 h Street Sammamish, WA 98015 (425) 369-2198 Cramer Northwest Inc. 945 North Central Suite 104 Kent, WA 98032 (253) 852-4880 SW Y. 33-23-05 11634 192"d Street, Renton R-6 2.2 9 Six du/acre Ranges from 16,427 to 5,690 square feet Single family Soos Creek Water & Sewer District · Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Fire District 40 Renton School District Complete Application Date: March 10, 2004 Associated Application: Road Variance File No. L04V0017 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The site is relatively flat. It slopes down gently from west to southeast. 2. Soils: One soil type is found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973. The entire site is classified as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB). The following is the soil characteristics: Report & Decision Page I of9 L04S0003 '' '' AqB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitati.ons for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folio, no mapped hydrographic · features exist on or near this site.· The site lies within the Soos Creek drainage basin. · 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in combination of weeds and grasses. Scattered evergreen/deciduous trees and brush occur in limited numbers. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the property. · 6. Mapped Sensitive Areas: The Sensitive Areas Folio does not identify any mapped sensitive areas as being present on this site. D. DESIGN FEATURES 1. Density, Lot Pattern, Comprehensive & Community Plan/SDO: The site has a density of six dwelling units per acre. The proposal is for 9 lots which is less than the base density afforded by the zone. The proposed lot sizes ranges from approximately 6,000 square feet to 16,000 square feet. Lot 7 is the largest which can be subdivided in the future to achieve the _ base density of the original parcel. · The proposal is subject to S0-220-significant tree retention requirements. 2. Access/Roadway Section: Access to the short subdivision will be via a newly constructed road which will be extended north from SE 192nd Street. A temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed at the north terminus of this road. All lots will have direct access to the newly constructed road. 3. Drainage: Surface water runoff leaves the site at the SE property corner and is conveyed along SE 192nd Street in an easterly direction. The proposed drainage facility will be located on-site near the property low point. It will be required to meet the level 11 flow control and basic water quality requirements. 4. Other Design Features: the proposal include a 4,500 square -foot tract for play and recreational activities. A conceptual recreation tract detailing the play faculties and landscaping will be required at the engineering plan submittal. 5. Utilities: The proposed lots will be.served by public water and sewer managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A certificate of water and sewer availability dated June 19, 2003 has been issued for this proposal. E. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: F. This short subdivision application is exempt from review under the State Environmental . Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Report and Decision LOM,0003 G. Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (i.e. 1993 King County Road Standards, 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approval. · DECISION: *-Ddt-./-ed pc.ir ~<?v,Sro/11 los-ft.E6 2-,f Proposed Short Plat revised and received August 26, 2004 (Attachment 1) is GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. . Title 19A D. /<.€v•,eD >/Te . (J[I/µ? Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A. of the King County Code All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. · All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise . approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording Modifications to the approved prelimiriary site plan (Attachment 1) are needed to allow for the extension of JUDT to lots 3 and 5. A revised site plan shall be submitted to ODES for review and approval. If additional modifications are required to accommodate engineering conditions, then those must be included in .the revised plan. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal: · · 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter One of the Surface Water Design Manual. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable · Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the .following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9,04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. A. 8. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit drainage and engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by ODES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the DOES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. · Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain Report and Decision LQ.!#S0003 outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the. time of the. building permit and shall complywith the plans on file." 3. · 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the KCRS, including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be. prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. ODES strongly recommends the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. All construction and. upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall be done in accordance with KCRS established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS) and shall comply with the following requirements: A. A road variance application regarding intersection spacing was approved by King County on May 1 ih, 2004. The final engineering plans for the short plat shall comply with all conditions of approval for the road variance decision. B. That portion of the north half of SE 192nd Street adjoining the subject property shall be improved to an urban principal arterial standard per KCRS Section 1.03. ok . C. . Twenty feet (20) of additional right-of-way for SE 192"d Street shall be dedicated along the south property line, allowing for 50 feet of right-of-way from centerline. D. at--·· .E. * F. * G. J. K. L. · The on-site road shall be constructed to a public urban subaccess standard per KCRS Section 2.03. . A 25-foot property line radii shall be dedicated at the intersection of the on-site road and SE 192"0 Street per KCRS Section 2.10. The joint-use-driveway tract (JUDT) shall be extended to reach lots 5 and 3. Lots 3 and 5 shall have undivided ownership of the access Tract and be responsible for its maintenance. A note to this effect shall be placed on the engineering plans and final plat. · The minimum roadway improvements within the JUDT shall be 18 feet wide and 20 feet long with.controlled drainage, This tract shall also meet the Fire Marshal requirements (See Fire marshal requirements for additional access standards): A temporary cul-de-sac shall be provided at the north terminus of the on-site road per KCRS Section 2.08). The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required when widening existing asphalt. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRS 5.03. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. Report and Decision L~0003 · M. * * The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance: · (2) There shall be no direct vehicular access to and from SE 192nd Street from the abutting lots (KCRS Section 2.02). Access shall be from the. on-site road. · ~~ (3) Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac and extension of the sidewalk shall be the responsibility of the developer who extends the road . .f \, c{) ti -:-." . o\1-~ i' 1,' ( 4) All utilities within proposed rights-of-way shall be included within a ,t-franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short subdivision recording. (5) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on t he final recorded short subdivision. 4. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed. prior to final recording of the short plat. 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) A. B. The applicant shall comply with all aoplicable provisions of KCC 16.82. 1/..ee l-eT ~ C.(IE'<t-lt./"1( 1 GIUfcl),NG CL€:~t..r.oG i The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with KCC 16.82.150 requirements at engineering and final short plat. 6 flJI(// AJG ./JI; { I: 6. Fire Code (KCC 17)-Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code: * ~ A. All portions of the exterior walls (at grade) of future residences constructed within this short plat must be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved ~ :::. -~ B.-., ..; ~ *" "' "'t;: C. access is a minimum 20-foot wide driving surface that supports 25 tons in all weather, is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end and with no gradient in excess of 15%. If a suitable access as described above is not provided, any future residences constructed on lots 3, 5 and 9 MAY have to be sprinklered per NFPA 13D · The proposed driveways serving the main body of these lots does not meet I he minimum 20-foot width requirement and portions of the exterior walls may be over 150 feet from approved access as outlined above. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the .fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which Report and Decision LO,S0003 *"'. B. f Ct4 T /./07 6 C. · do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Three additional lots may be created through the subdivision of Lot 7 as long as the zoning of the site remains R-6. This shall be noted on the recorded short plat. Lot 7 shall be developed in such a way that does not prevent any future short subdivision. Street Trees (KCC 21A.16) Street trees shall be provided along the street frontage and the new on site road as follows .(per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): 1. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. 2. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. 3. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. ,_ 4. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat 5. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft mapJes, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. 6. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. 7. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 192nd is on a bus route. If it is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. 8. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the short plat. If a performance bond is · posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted . or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. D. P-Suffix/ SDO Conditions (KCC 21A.38)-To implement KCC 21A.38.230 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan and the engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.38.230, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan which is part of the hearing record for this project. No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be Report and Decision LO!jS0003 E. provided, consistent with KCC 21A.38.23084. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 21A.38.23084d(2). . 1' . co«f',~ u·r«+r.,, ". ·r-,+ .4 . The 4:fiOO-squai -foot , ac, eatio,, tract is consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport couit[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). (1 ). An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES, with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and general improvements. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the overall conceptual. plan. (2). A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with the overall conceptual plan, as detailed in item a., shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the final piat documents. The landscape plan shall be prepared in accordance with KCC 21A.16. (3). A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 8. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS). King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording, or (8.) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14:75; Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid:" If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. A homeowner's association or.other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DOES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the Recreation Tract. · Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit ,an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances 8. The short subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. Tv·~ /Li f-//,... .. 'f C,t f:Jl./Vt>.J '-/ CAAJlr,<}C. . C. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division Report and Decision L0.1S0003 · Appeal Information and Parties of Record RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) ca.lendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on October 4, 2004. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. . If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) ahd the alleged errors in that decision. · The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner ofjurisdiction to consider the appeal. · Appeals must be submitted. to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL. Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre-hearing conference. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre-hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Parties and Persons of Interest: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Project Manager II DDES/LUSD Foster, Curt Sr. Engineer DDES/LUSD Hudson, Rich Program Manager Ill DDES/LUSD Kokesh, Robert & Arlene 7695 SW Westm,oor Way Portland, OR 97225 Report and Decision L0.4S0003 Rathinam, Shannila 24006 SE 10th Street Sammamish, WA 98075 Wilson, Terry Cramer Northwest Inc. 945 N. Central, Suite #104. Kent, WA 98032 Report and Decision L~OOOJ ·, t: ••····•-•·-··----··•;"SC•• -----, ·--··· , ·•----.... ••• ....... -~ J--· e ~ ~ •U ~i ~- ,..--- ...... ' ' . ' ~::;,_< SI:, . ' -~ ' .• ... I 'f.A"RTH C'ON~ULTlNC INCORPORATED 1&05 l36tb.Plm:Norttart Main: (425)643-3780 Suite 201 fax (425) 746-0860 Be1kwc, Wnshington.518005Toll Fm:-UISS-739-6670 DAILY FIELD REPORT Prcjeat Rathlnan Job Location S.E. 192"05,. , Kent flQld Rep. Abe Tim& On Site Travei Time Pennlt No. Job Ne. 12718 Time Off Site Miles Hrs. Charged Page of 1/1 Coto 3/17/07 Weather 0/C VisitOI'$ N/A Re~rt.No. Dayo Week Tuesda Client/Owner Charter Homes General Cont,actor Charter General COntreotor'e, Superintendel'lt Received Unchecked By Grading Contrador Archer Grading Foreman Trac Checked By Data Are approved Plans/Permits oo site? LJ Yes LJ No If No, contact the building department or e,,plain below. Permit No. I E.C.I. on site as requested for observation site condition of sub grade for curb and gutter. Contractor had areas along east and west sides of the street, indicated as road "A" on site specs, cut and graded to specified elevation. It was also observed that the sub grade had also been rolled and compacted. Sub grade was probed with a W' steel rod and probed in various locations along the east and west sides of the street. Sub grade was found to firm and unyielding with very dense conditions. In it's present condition, sub grade was found to be adequate and suitable for concrete placement. E.C.I. will return as needed or as conditions change. Abe Hernandez ;/k.,/E,, ,_.~ 206-255-6585 I COPY TO: CONTINUEO ON NEXT PAGE 0 000/oOO '2J 08808PL,oP x~j s,:Lo LOOo/6l/PO 'i I I C, EAR11i CONSULTING INCORPORATED 1805 1 36Ul Place Northeast Sui1e 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Main: (425) 643-3780 Fa• (425) 746-0860 Toll Free 1·888-739-6670 DAILY DENSITY TEST REPORT Job Location $.( Field Rep. ~ Time On Site IZ\ Permit No. Checked By Date Are approved Plans/Permits on site LJ Yes LJ No If No, contact the building department or explain below: Proiect No. Permit No. Test Reference Mu:lmum RII Test Dry %of Number Test LocaUon Elevation Compaction Ory Density Moisture Density Maximum Curve lbJcu. ft. .. lbJcu. ~ "'-·Densitu .. j ' -A -t-~<r.--J -, \ 0. ~rl'.I..• \ z...+,;;o 0 ,,... ,., I ?c I -I -LI I <'7 , q~ ., ,_ -A • 17•00 t I ~ l">«'Q Cl c-- -, I . . ! 1( ..;-·"'"" I -z. r. I ..,,., 7 01 a -, z....,. -,.._A ' -, h~ i'. <'C. I L ., I ~o.t., q~ ..... ' r J ... -.-~ -·----~" 2~ ,..._,_ A ' I z.. .l ,..,,., ~.l. I z.c, ~ a,_ ~u .c.. .... ..._ ! JI . -~.c: 13'0.f<" C4 I. z< S,rA : a[.,_ JlO 1 i:> .'Z. 1 l.'i. '-I C!S" --I I ; -'•,/.1;,TC' ., _I} • ~ I ...--r n , 11 LC" 'i<'.1-1 ?1. ~· q~ .,. ,__ --. I 11 +-Ccl CL 1. \ ... 'i_ 91A . ... _~ ~:,.It ' I Z-1-00 -..,..· ~ + ~ T' g,q Jt{),'f'I 9 {. 6 Field Rep. Job No. Page of Report No. E'AR1H CONSUL TING INCORPORATED Abe 12718 1 1 5 Time On Site Time Off Site Dale Day of Week 1805136th Place Norlheast Main: (425) 643-3780 03/17/07 Tuesdav Sui1e201 Fax (425) 746,-0860 Travel Time Miles Weather Belevue, Washington g5005 1-888-739-6670 overcast IOAIIL. Y IOENSITY TEST REPORT Permit No. Hra. Charged Visitors Project I Job LocaHon ClienVOwner Rathanim Southeast 192nd Street Kina Countv Charter Homes General Contractor General Contracto(s Superintendent Received Unchecked By Charter Grading Contractor Grading Foreman CheckQi)'i.1/1 / I Da}:/?. f /) 7 Archer , I Are approved Plans/Permits on-site L.J Yes L.J No If No, contact the building department or explain below: Project No. Permit No. Test Reference Maximum Fill Test Ory %of Number Test Location Elevation Compaction Ory Density Moisture Density Maximum Curve lbs.ICU. ft. % lbs.tcu. ft. Ory Densitv 19 East side of roed SG C 135.6 7.2 132.8 98 20 West side of road SG C 135.6 6.5 130.9 96 Supplementary Report: Earth Consulting Incorporated was on site at the request of the contractor la observe the roadway subgrade. The roadway was graded to subgrade elevations at the time of our visit. Based on our observations and discussions with the contractor, the roadway was filled with Class A import that was sampled on February 6, 2007 and designated as Proctor C. Proctor C was imported sand and gravel with a maximum dry density of 135.6 pcf and an optimum moisture of 7. 7%. Two density tests were conducted near the mid point of the roadway on each side. The remaining areas were probed with a 112 inch diameter probe and were observed to be firm and unyielding. All areas that were previously observed to be temporarily filled with unsuitable material have been removed andv replaced with the Type 17 soils that is tested above. Based on probing the subgrade, our density tests and our previous work on the site the subgrade is suitable for v / paving and curb and gutter placement. Abe Hernandez icoPYTO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE D I \_ .. "' Earth Consultants, Inc. Field Rep. Job No. Page of Report No. IJ) ?:),,w lb. ,z...,,r! I ,,f" I , A Bureau Veritas Company Time On Site Time Off Site Date/, /, Day of Week 82S 1805 1361h Place N.E. Main: (425) 64:J.J780 ,-z. :oo l'Z. :Sc /0 Z.7 "" F'",e ' Suite 201 Fax (425) 746-0860 Travel Time Miles Weather il~I.UI Bellevue, WA 98005 Toll Free (688) 739-6670 · I, o d.o Ci..ou"' 1 -'SSO -TT/A-.S'.· Daily Field Report Permit No. Hrs. Charged Visitors ' ;ject j Job Location l<£.J-r / A.e..Jro..; Client/Owner Ml/1,/Awt , t (.. t10 "=-' l"lt. ...P sr e.uA~£.4.-""' ,...a.s; General Contractor General Contractor's Superintendent Received Unchecked By C."AAr€A ... Grading Contractor Grading Foreman Checked By Date A . ..J ,t~;t. Are approved Plans/Permits on site? D Yes D No If No, contact lhe building department or explain below. Project No. Permit No. \ A...-"~-~,_, · -I -, -..., ... \A.._ 0" I ---r.A -... -A~ -----•e,,d v . ~.r,,l•-/1 ~ . . . ~ wA< .. ,,1/-Al -·-f",A D .,,,,,=._,6,c.)L.A -----. I -... •• ,,,._. . -.. -----J.1. --A-~-A --. J ~ c_ -I , .,... ....,,_J.'M . ---. ~ --"\T""-f.11 '111:: --:*· ---=---,QAV,--· .. -. -. ___ ._ --.... .,._._ . ,,,,,,._ ~. --I "".'.'>a. • . -· --------. . ..-,c_.,.L" . . "' -. tJ,u.. ~ I ;._ ,, A '°'c.,t -J -·I --··--I ~ \. -IM. )<l,zi:. • :,, Z.06-5'7 J -"-31 1 I COPYTO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE oj Daily Field Reporl, Oelober 1, 2005 Earth Consultants, Inc. . A Bureau Veritas Company 1805 136thPJaceN.E Suitc201 ij:iii;IW·l•IH _Bellevue, WA 98005 Mi;ill·i-1' Main: (425) 643-3780 Fox(425)746.0S60 Toll Free (888) 739-6670 Daily Density Test Re ort Project R.krlf, ...J A""- Job Location // <-</o :Se. l'rZ-,J ST Field Rep. '.b,4,J 2:). Time On Site "f :-SD Travel llme /.o Permit No. Job No. I Z.7f8 Time Off Site o:so Miles S'? Hrs. Charged z.o General Contractor C.111/ILT/i!.A.. General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Contrador A,«Ji£f2... Grading Foreman v£1'-t=- Visitors Report No. Z- Day of Week 1'1/10,J ClientJOwner CJIA&-rt:A.. ,-.Jo,...e.s Received Unchecked By Checked By Date Are approved Plans/Permits on site? U Yes U No If No, contact the building department or explain below. Proiect No. Permit No. Test Reference Maximum Fill Test Dry %of Number Test Location Elevation Compaction Ory Density Moisture Oen&ily Maximum Curve lbs./cu. ft. % lbsJcu. ft.· Drv Densltv IA ,._ ., ,,,,. ,.,..,_, . _, 4 /Z.f:,I If/, I /O!:°, tJ 8z. z.. Z.S' J!'"r •I i!Jr M "· 7!... -I I I /7. 'l /De..S t,5 . "TS,:..-S 4>r NIU•"" -L... I-,.,;. 0 ,,~.7 'i/'1 ' 10 F-r w Dr NI/I• e, :;.-~ -.. .... It.,"', L, //, 'f ,o, .ll' 8"7 ' ~h' ,, DF .... 1..1 .. .:, 5£,,)Ul.$'(Ud -· I I ,~ ,J (07,9 ST / -s-Fr ~ Al: a..tLJ-;lt: . -,~ -z.. ~ -,, ,7 If(,'!, "II Supplementary Report: AS ~eque.S-r£.b I tic./ WAS t>,J :S~ 7o ~>/'~ l=A/'-71/wol(J(. At!.Tll/ tTtE.S. A,R.a.Jle.e. HIU) 'SACl::f' tLLLtJ .:S£"1£it.. "17:u;.,Jc,.(£5 +' ::57"«8$ A,=-~ Abb,...i? WA-n.,e. l:ue:. 7" L.o«.) MDtS'T"u.e..e._ Co,rrif.,c.J-, OAI ,:/Z./i:.A, 10/z7/o, , '11:"lt../ Ei/L.J-r;s ec.c.. • -- OVl!:.e... -n1B. ,.,Ju;.,<e...U,, .,.~ 'Toi° 7'l.JD-F£e.:r Cr 3'1C,l::J"1L!,. wk:!. ,/11!.IZ'( we.:r <c)f/1~ CDMf'IWMf$£./:, '?~£.11,ou..s ~PAc.:r,o..t ~,=:o,e.,~1 ALD<JG-~Ab N,4". A V1AA.lttD'-'f ""911!--PAC.~ w,t:S uS£.lJ -,;; t!.DM~Ac.-r 13A-c.i<i<'1L-L.' "bt!.us,.,...,. res, e&'.St.<L.'rS .4, ~C,,/-7"1()<.J.S ~s-rtj J :Z:AJ/, 1t!.,tJTt:., /NAb~=rc. CoM/04-c-,,o,,.J ~ 7b L!><C€SSt//L :$Oil-MO(S7'><./L£. AT ,:JI>... ,$£.,L-6..) q,,:; dr ,<,(,</)(tMI.U« ~ -i,E.,.Jsry P£:JZ. A-s,- 1)-1"5~7 M,i)11'-,e.i) P-'!..>c.ro.e. kt ,1!£cG):..,nEAJ/)S J>£<(1,J6-t>P-i-Lfce.i) J:,u., olZ. DV.£.i!.=.+t/4-,,c,,J A,c/,.d / 1,i,i1>,,,1.:r o>F s-...... ..-,i~'-L sr~c..r"'-M1-,:-,,,_._. /tu wlL.<.. JZ&-TU..4.,J A:S ;€£.quL~. 'T",l,'/<J1<-:... ( ~ ~ -z.,,.:; '57/ -4-3,, ' I COPYTO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 l'el. 10/05 I Earth Consultants, Inc. Field Rep. Job No. Page of Report No. . .~ '.b i4,J 'b. /Z."7/8 I or I ""'3· • • A Bureau Verilas Company Time On Site Time Off Site oa:/, ,/i Day of Week 1• • Jt):Oo I/ :,,S:-10 ., &"-7'"«.£. ~bl t80S 1361h Pi,ce N.E. Main:(425)643-3780 · Travel Time Miles Weather Suitc201 Fax(425)746-0860 ./o o ij:jlitl#·iUJ Bellevue. WA 9800S Toll fr,e (888)73~70 /,0 'BS t!.• ,e:,tL @)Jj;lll·V."8 Permit No. Hrs. Charged Vlsilors Dall Density Test Report '2. .-z.'S ~~ Joblo,on /'IZ"Ps, K~ I Rt:.,,.J7TM./ ClienVOWner I '/I I -..J lt""I / I&, o StZ. C.#'41/.'r6~ #o,..e.s General Contractor General Contractor's Superintendent Received Unchecked By C.J,l,tA:r£,a Grading Contractor Grading Foreman Checked By Date A,.lt, O.IIE.11... ..;~,=, Are approved Plans/Permits on site? u Yes LJ No If No, contact the building department or explain below. Permit No. Test Reference Maximum Fill Tesl Ory %of Number Test Location Elevatlon Compaction D,y Density Moisture Density Maximum ... o Curve lbs.lcu. ft. % lbs.ICU. ft. Div Oensitv .. @. nl H -<I I.OCA'T'•O.v 0 A JZ8. I fl, I /1~,C "" CZ' .Sc!:> Pr e:. GI"-mH-<I, 0 I I 10, ( /1!.I, 3 </1> <1 8'o Pr C.. "'"' /kH -.J. -1 I I /f.';!5 /17, (.. q"'Z- 10 '2.0 ~.,..,.) ,,,:; Ill;; -z.. -1 I I I I, '!!: ""~ ~ ' I 10 Fr ;J ,:,F Mff-7--I I I /0, .J. /17,9 '1-Z.- rz ... S~S'T'k8 L-DT"/ -I,!, --,J., <f 107. / 'i!'I IS I~ ,:.,-.; 6/C MH·3 -( = /Z-3."Z... rs .... Jo!:'. I l?5" ,,1 .,,., MH • 3 -I I I ,J.,q Jt!,. z-'1-z- 1!, $£,.A),£.L .... .,......s J./>'r7 -f!>.S I I , z. ,:,. '°' .c.. ll9 ,,_ ,_ ,,.r ,..; 0 ,t: /Ill I{ -"' :,£,,)6( , -dS L-. '--/"';:I, I 11-f. ~ 93 ,.., ""-Pr • oP MH -'Z-_ ... .A. rz.Pl, I I~•., 10?~ 'i,.s°' '°' 1-"'u $1£1JLL S'1U<!I -J..o-r 3 -3 L-I-'"'·s 107,-, $'<I Supplementary Report:As.e~u.£.s?lSb, £,e/ a,14.S o,J :s,"TZ. 7o os:se.evL l:All.T#w'*-K. ,4er,V1r1£S . A~ H"I/:, :2'.'<IS'T'AL.L..£4 ,4,Jl) 8'1c.«1"",u..E,L) Se....Je.e.. -rll.£J..Jcl-{ F~,., MH-z Tb 7"tlt:. MIi • ,f. L.oc.,fr,o<) ,11....,,.J6---nfe. .So..-rH~,.J '?leoP~ry ,E,,/Sl!.,.,,,~7. 4R.cA~ "Ill:, C.OM p.qc,,rl!U!, -nit:-oAC..::P~ u.51...16-A Vt~TDILf #,,E,.. F'>-4<:;<. , A~c,./1£A.. "1" -ffbL./!.l) .. ...,.....,,.,. ~a,,i,,,o.Js oAI RDA.I ''.,i" 'JJA~F,,_,_ -n, a-n.sr "':t,e,J.s,""1 l)P :i,,,,_ 4,,..,p,>1c.."T'10,J 74/0 -1'£.E.T :S£<-o<J V.c.A.)" ..J£..T $u,<F',c.., .q~ ::s,,,._s. 'bl!;,us, sr lt!£.s, .... ,:r:s Au,,.;,:,. -rH£. Sot.<.,1+££,,.J 5~£.L J..1,JL r,Jl,/C..ATE. /-GS$ THA " 'I ,41,~......vr-L ~P'4-CTIDN, As l>o ~.s.:s:... ... 7"'~ €..LS£,.,)ffE:Ja,r:._ AUAJ6' "ZoM A ) ,JC-L,<,Ll:,,,Jtc,-?~-~<><-4!.:b /e:.srs :21«.<E-,z, i:'.Kc£<s .5et&.... Mb1:sr~ 06>""7&,J"r. A..,. -r./£. -nm/!!:. 1>t= e;~ s,re. v,s.. r., :$"«.S&AAJ!~ Sd1'-S /lfL.E... 1,v,+b~re. FoL :,,.,_,qc,c,.,~ €JP ZAiJ &fs£. m,4,e,12.,A<.S. &e1 2ec.,,.,,,.,G<l.dS /HI P,r;/t .. :7"' t.J(:r .$,.,t.f ,,4 1.3,:..£ '57"''2...L c.T-£.... ""''-t 1!>12.. 7)"o/ tAJ 6,, V: e,,.,,,/'4e:ret) !=1<-<-• €c.1 ,.;,,_ .... ~E.r.....e.J ~ ~u.e..s.,-e;.J:i, -rllAIJl.:.s., ,,_,/ ~ ~~-5"7! -L/-311.. I COPYTO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 Vff, ltwS " .. :, ,. " "' I ~ Earth Consultants, Inc. Field Rep. Job No. Page of Repo.'.1JNO. ';M,J ~ /1:?l"ir I o<F 11-U vi;_,,~ !~ A Bureau Veritas Company Time On Site Time Off Site Dati. f. Day of Week ,.J,$,;, 82S 1805 136th Place N.E. Main: (425) 643-3780 1S':'S,:, II t>I l!)f.,. c.,)£.J::, . Suite 201 Fax(425)746-0860 Travel Time Miles Weather R'·E:;&:iU~ Bellevue, WA 9800~ Toi Free (888) 739-6670 /,0 :S'il i>r • c,.,,...i;.., ./.S" D . ~lff"A!S'.. Daily Field Report Permit No. Hrs. Charged Visitors 'Z,. D Project ! Job Location Ktli!.Alr /~twro,J ClienUOwner '°R.ATt,/ I ,.J A "1 Jl(o./o SL 11t:."" Avllt. c,;,q~rE,e.. J/o,,..E..S General Contractor General Contractor's Superintendent Received Unchecked By C-ff.q<2.-rEA... Grading Contractor Grading Foreman Checked By Date ,4/l.c.lH.,Q_ ..J£Ft= Are approved Plans/Permits on site? D Yes D No If No, contact the building department or explain below. Project No. Penmit No. JI'!, b4-... £.--A t!.c.1 4.14.S ,uJ "'·-..... "&1!1<111!.. "'-A.t.-nlw.JtJ,t.x. Ac..r1v1r1£s ,4,eefl,t;.e... s...-.e v", _.e._ wAs ,Jo.,.. DAJ :!.,rE. "'tfl.tJ#IU2... ..JA.s 1.J:srA4.4,..JG- :Sn~~ ·MA,,J A.t..o•·"" NOILTI-/ ':r:,,-rC!,-(-.t..,-..Je.. "r-° .S4. 19z...d' sr S,o U'T"H E:A s "T" AA.Jll ,tr ...,-1/L .SOwTH £"/ST c.c.t!.Al£.;t1... ,:,~ THE. :.,~. -no. £AJ c.{ £1tJ:.,A v "I r,o-J «J4.S 15/JA-UJ cJ w,r,., APPA.o J.< /.,..,A T'S ~ ._, I Z. To 18 -/A/C#E:$ (!)!= ,e,,._,_ A.S..v'e.. T#L ?,~ c.e.e-=rr-. CD,., PA C.7'!<,4 F'iJ-L-WA~ :so;=-r ,4,..[.A 1/1e.t-b1..J~ ~U.E:. °7'b _.tx,v~ DPTIM...,_,,_, MD1.Sr .... lLE. A,AlA .s,,,....e.. ...e&-.4AJ ,c.. ,.., ,.re,e,4-<-~-1/!J.J,. A . • -· ,A 7,J,tt, 3A=F,,._,_ ..;11.s -rt!!AiPo,e.;;~· · U.A.J"'T Ji .. 111.+r~A-z... ri~u.<..b 6E. ::I:hl !'IP ~T 1£.Jl , e:c., ,'!t!A,t, ,.,. .... L>J I> ... Zml"l!t ,a.,, ,.1? .::;....., rt9S<..L. :S"rA4,.,cO."T~L.... ,:::,L-~ ntL ~,,,e_,..., .:;;,124,,J /1511C..1.::,:: I u_ A,.V.0 "=EP,_A eEft1 e....i T OP: MATE.A., A-£.. U ~,,,,,,,. "'--rlh<.s F"lfllfL • £ :5 PIS c, A'-'-'-' ,S,,JC£_ -r~c.>{ LnJ,i!:. I.S 7 ~= -ro ?otfll> -PA\1£.ArE.IJr. &c., tv"-<-IZ.e...,-u.e.,J AS ,e--:S'T1£6. -nJA..Jl<S, ( '0,,..-, .. " .. z.DI'. -,5-? ( -LL31/ I COPY TO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ol Dally Field Report, October 1, 2005 Field Rep. Report No. Job No. Page of EARTH CONSUl.11NG INCORPORATEDf-:A=-be"-=~~-1-,:===-+-,;..-_:...--+;;c.5-=~-1 Time On Site Day of Week 12718 1 1 Time Off Site Date 1806136th Place Northeast Sui1o201 BeJevue, Washlng!On 98005 Main: (425) 843-3780 Fax (425) 746-0860 1-888-739-6670 DAILY IOENSD11Y TEST REPORT Project Rathanim Job Location Southeast 192nd Street Kin Coun Travel Time Pennit No. General Contractor Charter General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Contractor Archer Grading Foreman 03/17/07 Miles Weather overcast Hrs. Charged Visitors CllenUOwner Charter Homes Tuesda Received Unchecked By Checked By Date Are approved Plans/Permits on-site U Yes U No If No, contact the building department or explain below: Project No. Permit No. Test Reference Maximum Fill Test Dry %of Number Test Location Elevation Compaction Dry Density Moisture Density Maximum Curve lbs.ICU. ft. % lbsJcu. ft. Dry OenSitv 19 East side of road SG C 135.6 7.2 132.8 98 20 West side of road SG C 135.6 6.5 130.9 96 Supplementary Report: Earth Consulting Incorporated was on site at the request of the contractor to observe the roadway subgrade. The roadway was graded to subgrade elevations at the time of our visit. Based on our observations and discussions with the contractor, the roadway was filled with Class A import that was sampled on February 6, 2007 and designated as Proctor C. Proctor C was imported sand and gravel with a maximum dry density of 135.6 pcf and an optimum moisture of 7. 7%. Two density tests were conducted near the mid point of the roadway on each side. The remaining areas were probed with a 1/2 inch diameter probe and were observed to be firm and unyielding. Based on probing the subgrade, our density tests and our previous work on the site the subgrade is suitable for paving and curb and gutter placement. Abe Hernandez CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE O ! I COMPACTION TEST REPORT 134 '\. I"- '\. ' 129 '\. ,_ '\. I/ .... ' / ' ' ~ I / ' 124 I .... & i/ i ' ' " I 'I ~ "' " I/ .., J " "-a , !Is I'.. 119 ., ~ I'.. -~ ' ~ I', ~ ZAVfo Sp.G.• \ 2.65 114 109 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 1557-02 Procedure C Modified Oversize correction a"'""'lled to each ....... Int Elev/ Classifii:atlon Nal Sp.G. Pl %> %< Depth uses AASHTO Moisl LL 3/4 in. No.200 10.6 2.6S 2.5 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 128.1 pcf 127.4 pcf Brown silty Sand Optimum moisture= 9. 7 % 10.0% Project No. E-12718 Client: Remarks: Project: Ruthlnam Sampled by: DOD Tested by: MAH on 1112< 2006 o Location: S. Sewer Trench ~-.i---A COMPACTION TEST REPORT EARTH CONSULTANTS. INC. Plate I COMPACTION TEST REPORT 125.0 ' \ ' \ .ir ' ' 122.5 _.,, \. \ ' ' -... ' \ .ir ' \ 120.0 , .,. ~ \ 8. ~ r ' \ II. Cl) \ .., ~ ~ 0 ' '\ ' 117.5 " ' ' \ I\\ ' \ 115.0 \ \ \ \ \ \ ZAVfor ' \ Sp.G.= 112.5 . '\ 2.65 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 1557-02 Procedure C Modified Oversize correction annJied to each oolnt Elev/ ClassificaUon Nat. Pl %> 'k< Depth . Sp.G. LL No.200 uses AASHTO Moist 314 In. 8.0 2.65 S.1 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 123.2 pcf 121.3 pcf Brown silty Sand Optimum moisture= 10.4 % 11.1 % Project No. E-12718 Client: Remarks: Project: Rathinam Sampled by: DDD Tested by: MAH on 11/20/2006 o LocaUon: N. Sewer Trench ~'t-'('i'«-~ '"& COMPACTION TEST REPORT EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Plate 140 130 120 g_ 110 t i d 100 90 80 ' COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project No.: E-12718 Project: Rathinam Location: ElevJDepth: Remarks: Sampled By: DOD Tested By: LSB Description: Type A import Classlflcatlons • Nat Moist= Uquld Limit= % > 3/4 In.= 17.8 % uses: Curve No.:·c SampleNo. C MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AASHTO: Sp.G. = 2.65 Plasticity Index = %<No.200= TEST RESULTS Maximum dzy density= 135.6 pcf '1ntimum moisture -1.7 % ~ ' Test speclflcatlon: ' ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C Modified ' ,. ~ ' ' \. ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' Date: 2/6/2007 -... ' ' 100% SATURATION CURVES ' ' FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO:. " 2.8 ~ ... 2.7 ,_ 2.6 ... ' r,.: .... ' " ' ' ... ' ,.,_ -~ " r,. 'h ,~ ~ 1'. 1' ' ...... ~ ... " ~ ~ - ' 70 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Water content, % Plate .... ... i..... - 40 1...----------------Earth Consultants, Inc .. -----------------' Townsend, Steve From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mr Nguyen: Thinley, Tenzing Monday, July 02, 2007 1 :42 PM Nguyen, Viet Dunn, Reagan; Townsend, Steve; Miles, Joe; Fay, Larry RE: Possible Soil Contamination -parcel#: 6198400360 The project is called Rathinam Short Plat and our project# is L04S0003. The pond has been in place for more than 6 months. This is the first I heard about Mr. Bail's concerns but I will visit site today to investigate further. I will also be getting in touch with the developer and design engineer to discuss issues raised by the complainant. I talked to Mr. Bail who told me that he had tried to get the developer to address these issues but didn't get any responses. Unfortunately, he did not contact me earlier. He is forwarding all correspondence to me soon. Mr. Bail also raised some concerns about setbacks from his septic system, his property line and elevations of the pond. He also claimed that contaminated soil was used in the fill at the edge of the pond. I just talked to the development project manager and he hasn't heard about this. According to him, Mr. Bail's contact person no longer works for them. However, I did notify them that we will be investigating the claims. Thanks Tenzing Thinley, PE Engineer II DOES/LUIS Phone: 206-296-7038 Fax: 206-296-7174 From: Nguyen, Viet Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 12:54 PM To: Cc: Thinley, Tenzing; Townsend, Steve; Miles, Joe; Fay, Larry Dunn, Reagan Subject: Possible Soil Contamination -parcel #: 6198400360 Dear DOES, DPH: Councilmember Dunn was contacted by constituent Robert Bail whose property at 11806 SE 192nd St (parcel#: 6198400360) is experiencing odors, which may be caused by the construction of a retention pond to the parcel adjacent to the west. That parcel, #6198400180, is owned by Charter Homes, which completed construction of the elevated retention pond, with outflow and storm drain, sometime last year. It is alleged that the retention pond was built over fill which was placed illegally on the property. Mr. Bail is claiming that the soil on his property may have become contaminated, as detected by the emanation of odors from the soil. He is also concerned about whether or not there are specific administrative rules and/or King County codes related to the siting of retention ponds, including setbacks, and whether or not those procedures were met by the developer pursuant to development applications. Councilmember Dunn is asking your respective agencies to investigate this issue to determine whether or not a sufficient determination was made regarding the siting of this retention pond and whether or not a public health hazard exists due to its construction. Mr. Bail can be reached at 253.859.2338 and 206.510.8989, if you require additional information. Please try the 253 number first. Councilmember Dunn is hopeful we can have this issue resolved within 7-10 business days. Please let me know if this timeframe is appropriate, given your work schedules. 1 @ King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division, UPD Unit 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Phone: 206-296-7232 Fax: 206-296-7174 A,Do/li:I H lqWIU:" To: Charter Homes % 'im I I ,tee,, -From: Tim Cheatum Fax: 206-322-0482 Pages: 4 Phone: 206-322-4393 ext 108 Date: 09/14/2006 Re: Construction activity signage CC: D Urgent D For Review D Please Comment D Please Reply o Comments: Jim. If you have any questions on this, please contact me at the number above D Please Recycle •' .· ,- @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ' Project No.: L--t1</S ('.:l 60 3 Project Name: & ./--LJII ,a /A'> Activity No.: _L_o=,S;._..=.5..;_I_;;_/ :Z"--><8 __ Date: a I /3 It>(, r , SI' NAME [ ] Developer: .:Ji· M . H J f 'S<f'Y'::: ( or designated representative) • 24-br. Emergency Contact & Tel No: [ ] Contractor: ~ ~~1 1,JC., [ ] License #: [ ] Subcontractor:---------- [ ] License #: [ ] Engineer: [ ] Inspector: -r7""' Ck,1-v ,n [ ) TESC Snpervisor: -------- [ ] Other: ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. AGENDA FOR MEETING-Check as items are discussed or marked N/A L 2. at the Precons ction Conti rence [-'I ~pplicant transfer form designating contractor to act as the applicant (or owner present) E--f Jssued permit and approved construction plans (inclucjlng HPA). ~ J, [..{,HP A or Fisheries contact; HP A required _Yes _./_ NNo _Developer Representative Initials. Iv/ J.v /~ . (~Forest Practice Permit required for> 5,000 board feet of marketable timber, proviqe copy to inspector. [.J' Approved sanitary and water utility plans copy to inspector received? _Yes _./_ }No [:3opy of Certificate of Liability Insurance naming King County as additional insured, required for any drainage facility work. [,!';Easement(s) for off-site work; provide copy to inspector. ,[ ,if ;Contractor's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) location on-site or provided to King Connty (WAC 296-62-05409). ti:lt Pre-Issuance Construction Authorization (PICA) letter, signed by King Connty and Developer [ Approved plans [ 11 Assued permit (commercials) [ ,1 Right-of-Way Use permit S:CUrrentform\Preconst.wd.12.28.04 Page I of7 .[~ Notice of Construction Activity sign (KCC 20.20.060) must be posted prior to any construction. (Required for all formal · subdivisions; and any grading and/or building pennit subject to SEPA.) See Notice of Construction Activity flyer. 3. Other Requirements Alljonstruction details/procedures are not sh wn on the approved plans, but can be found in the following standards. [.(~pplication Date -6 -0 [,1 JGng County Road Standards (KCRS) 1993; _1987; _1979; _1969; (check applicable standard) [ i,WSDOT/APW A standard specifications and plans; manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Construction Traffic Control. / [)¥"Surface Water Design Manual _/_ 11998; _1990; _1979; (check applicable standard) 4. You Are Required to Notify the Inspector at the Following Stages of Construction (KCRS Chapter 9) [ ipne working day prior to site work start-up. . [,.f ,One working day prior to starting any underground utility work. (see Item 8). [ .( One working day prior to placing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; passing density tests and "proof rolling" are required. ) Density tests must be approved prior to proof rolling. (see Item 8). . ['1 One working day prior to placing crushed rock. The developer/contractor shall first provide passing density and "proof rolling" test of the native subgrade to verify the subgrade is visibly firm, compact, and suitable for surfacing. [ hree working days prior to paving roadway. [ hree working days prior to start of work on cast-in-place concrete structures. 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Controls /ESC) [~Clearing limits shall be accurately flagged in the field as shown on the plan, prior to clearing. [...1/ Native Growth Protection Easements shall be flagged or fenced as shown on plan. [ /JJ Erosion and sediment controls shall be installed as the first step of construction. [.,f Field conditions may require that erosion and sedimentation measures indicated on the plans be modified or fapplemented. [ vj;. The developer is responsible for the adequacy of all erosion and sediment controls throughout the life of the project. [ <'] Control mud onto existing streets. 1) Install rock pad or truck wash at construction entrances; 2) Wash truck tires if ;necessary; 3) Keep adjoining roads clean. Don't wash mud and silt into drainage systems. [vf All denuded areas must be mulched and seeded or otherwise stabilized to prevent sediment-laden water from leaving the ;site or entering the storm drainage systems. [ ,% Provide an area on-site for cleaning concrete trucks. Effluent from concrete operations shall not be allowed to enter the ), storm drainage systems. AP,,- . [~Projects that fall under the 1990 or 1998 drainage manual require covering within 12 hours from October 1 through Maieh"" .30 [, J/ TESC Supervisor required per SWM Manual D.5.4 on all sites. [I[ Highly Sensitive Site (SWM Manual D.5.4.) TESC Supervisor (several years 0(£onstru.9tion SUJ?.!:lYision or inspection and background in geology, soil science, or agronomy). Required for this site? Yes _v_ ., N~--.. / If yes, Name & Phone No. ________________ _ [,I) TESC Supervisor Sign, (name and phone number) required at all primary site entrances. (Can be included on / Construction Notice sign.) [,I] Recommend obtaining approval for non-standard water quality proposals well in advance of the need. 6. Utilities and Storm Drainage [ ), All utility construction on KC Right-of-Way requires a construction pennit issued by Property Services (KCC 14.44). [ 1 Copies of approved plans and utility certificate must be provided before utility construction begins. [ 1J Are there any underground crossings on existing County road? (See open cut policy and KC Road Standards Section f 8.03). Open cuts are not generally authorized. Parallel cuts in roadway require full width overlay. [ Location conflicts. Notify inspector prior to any relocation. [ Pipe specifications, bands, gaskets, bedding (WSDOT/APWA) Standard Specifications). [ 1.)::PEP (N-12, Hi-Q) pipe requires extra care; store on flat surface to avoid deformation. [ ,J' Recommend locating CBs with at least two survey points to avoid misaligrunent with curb and gutter. S:OJrrentform\Preconst.wd.12.28.04 Page 2 of7 Compaction Method o Mechanical • Water settling • ;Regardless of method used, density standards must be met and documented (see Item 8). f/l Finish work on drainage structures • Adjustment sections minimum of one, maximum 16 inches. • Grout • Ladders -extend to within 16 inches from bottom of each catch basin and securely fastened to CB. • Frames, covers, and grates -OUTFALL TO STREAM -DUMP NO POLLUTANTS, PROPERTY OF KING COUNTY, STORM OR DRAIN ("Property of King County" not required for private systems). • Locking covers and grates required outside of traveled roadway. 1993 KCRS projects: all storm drain covers and grates shall be locking (except rolled grates in rolled curb). [j' Lot stubouts installed and staked prior to signoff, 2 x 4 painted white and marked "Storm" or "Drain." ({ All utilities including vaults, distribution lines, and poles located within road section must be installed prior to fmal --/construction approval. [Al, l Utility poles and other obstacles must be located per King County standards, generally no closer than IO feet from edge of traveled way. [ /J;Call ONE-CALL (1-800-424-5555) and locate all existing utilities prior to starting any work. . [J' All road closures must be approved by the King County Department of Transportation, Traffic, in advance. 7. Retention/Detention Facilities [ /rroperty comers on easements and tracts must be permanently staked, and facilities must be built within the easement/tract [ Pond and berm slopes shall be 3: I or flatter, unless otherwise approved. f:as shown on the plans. [ RID facilities shall be constructed and operational prior to any building construction; curbing, paving, or recording of subdivision/PUDs (KCC 9.04.090). Documentation required per Public Rule. Discuss Public Rule requirements. Control Structures: [,f" Access road to control structure, pond bottom, vaults, or tanks • Width and surfacing, 12-foot-wide crushed surfacing (15 feet on curves) • Bollards or fence gates [ A Restrictor "T" section riser and gate control assembly o Reconunend inspection of "T" section prior to installation • Gate and outlet pipe must be watertight o Materials must be similar • · Min. 2-foot clearance from ladder and any obstruction • Riser straps and gate chain/rod required • Must be able to open gate from the riser [f/,,__ adders must extend to within 16 inches of bottom of each basin and be securely fastened to the CB wall. ( :V~overs on restrictor and access manholes must be solid, round, locking lids marked STORM or DRAIN. [ Locking covers shall be required on all facilities located outside the curb, ditch line, or normal driving surface. 1993 KCRS projects: all storm drain covers and grates shall be Jocking. 8. Roadway Certification Requirements: The following guidelines will be used by the Department of Development and Environmental Services for minimum test and sample frequency. Additional tests may be required as the inspector deems necessary. Density Tests: WSDOT Sec. 2-03.3(14)D, KCRS 9.04, 3.03 o 90% or 95%, moisture content~ 3% above optimum S:Currentform\Preconst.wd.12,29,04 Page 3 of7 [ A Compaction control tests • WSDOT method No. 609 (AASHTO T-99/Standard Proctor). For >25% retained on the #4 sieve, use Standard Proctor with Rock Correction Factor. • PE review and approval [ lrrenches: See Utility Trench Compaction Rule, November 1983, and KC Road Standards Section 8.03. Sanitary, storm, water, gas, and power, etc., in the roadway prism: • Minimum one test every trench, and one test every 500 feet of trench length • Test up to 50% trench depth (top 4 feet-95%; below 4 feet-90%) • In-place densities and moisture content shall be detennined by the nuclear gauge or Washington densometer method • Test as trench is backfilled !• Controlled density fill may be used above bedding [. Cut section: WSDOT Sec. 2-06 • Minimum one test every 500 feet (100 feet, 1993 KCRS) on roadway subgrade, under curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Top 6 inches minimum density 95%. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk 90% J • (pre 1993 KCRS projects only): Firm and compacted under sidewalks (WSDOT Sec. 8-14) (J Embankment and fill sections: WSDOT Sec. 2-03.3(14)C • Minimum one test every 500 lineal feet on each foot of fill (1,000 cyds., 1993 KCRS) • A minimum ofone test per lift • Compaction method B shall be used unless otherwise specified • 95% top 2 feet 90% below 2 feet • Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks minimum density 90% (1993 KCRS) Popr Subgrade: KCRS 4.02 [)Ji Standard material thickness are not acceptable if native subgrade is unstable as shown during the proof roll test. Remedial measures will be subject to review and approval by King County prior to installation [Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) KCRS 4.04 may be used over isolated areas of unstable subgrade. Six month delay with affic loading required pnor to final left. [ Soil Amendments, Cement Treated Base (CTB), Cement Kiln Dust (CKD), etc. require King County review and approval prior to use. [ Developer/contractor must notify inspector for conference prior to beginning work Ctcrete Tests: WSDOT Sec. 6-02 []· Mix to conform to standards and must be verified on delivery tickets. State mix design ( 6-02.3(2)C) must be used unless approved by King County. Standard mix does not include fly ash [ Curbs must conform to Drawing No. 9. Back must be 12" high and 6" in front. Sidewalks are 4" behind vertical curb, ~ -/xcept at driveways where the thickness shall be 5". Sidewalks shall be 5" behind rolled curb [...,j'}Joints in curb and gutter shall conform to Drawing No. 8 [ Wheelchair ramps shall conform to WSDOT standards [ Slump tests: Max. 3" vibrated concrete, 7" nonvibrated concrete [ Cylinder tests, 7 days, 28-day strength, normally 3,000 psi Cgzlcrete structures certification: · ["l Bridges, retai~in walls, .and retention vaults must be designed by a professional structural engineer and may require special inspecti s per the Uniform Building Code (see 1701, 1994 UBC). Special inspections required on this job __ Yes __ No 9. Surf: in and General Re uirements: Review Standards Not Shown on Plans Asphalt paving --laydown methods/equipment: WSDOT Sec. 5-04, pavers self-contained, power-propelled units. Truck- mounted pavers shall only be used for paving of irregularly-shaped or minor areas, or (KCRS 4.04): I. Pavement widths < 8 feet i 2. Pavement lengths < 150 feet [ Mailbox locations, conflicts with pedestrian/handicapped access [ .,\/Mailbox stands, NDCBUs installed before Final Construction Approval (KCRS 5.04) [ J Finish work on cut-and-fill slopes: Sec. 8.05 S:CUrrentform\Preconat.wd.12.26.04 Page 4 of7 [.{ Safety ~nd Traffic hazards (KCRS 9 .05) • Traffic control: required for all work in the right-of-way of the traveling public, must comply with the MUTCD • Utility poles or other natural or manmade obstacles higher than 6" /; ~ Walls require end design protection • Flaggers must have state flagging cards ['],,,Roadside culverts, beveled ends ['[ Quarry Spalls: 8 inches minus WSDOT Sec. 9-13.6 [ ] Barricades--construction: orange and white, stripes sloped downward 45 degree in the direction traffic is to pass • Temporary closures: Type III • Street termination permanent: red and white stripes and end-of-road marker • Plan Change Procedure [,,j Any changes to the originally approved plan will require a Plan Change and must be reviewed by the inspector prior to construction and approval. Design Plan Changes also require submittal and approval by the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Services and/or Building Services Divisions. • 2003 Fee ordinance fees are: (Please note, fees are subject to change yearly) ~ Land Use Services review fees: $1,654.28 each submittal and $144.90 per hour (deposit required) • Building Services review fees: $1,654.28 each submittal and $144.90 per hour (deposit required) [ All inspection charges for this permit will be hourly. Inspection Fees/ Additional Financial Guarantees [).¥Current hourly fee is$ 144.90. [ Each reinspection (performing the same inspection again on a different day) will be charged a $460 reinspection fee '/ ($212.75 residential single family). [,1' Supplemental Inspections (inspections after punch list indicates all fieldwork is complete; required if Final Construction Approval is not granted within 30 days of punch list) will be charged a minimum of 1.5 hours (at the current rate). Financial Guarantees [A' Public improvements require a maintenance and defect financial guarantee that will guarantee improvements and maintenance for two years. These financial guarantees will be required before Final Construction Approval. Pre 2000 subdivision/short subdivisions [ ] Plats/short plats without drainage facilities may be recorded before Final Construction Approval after posting a performance financial guarantee and approval by the inspector. Drainage facilities on plats/short plats must be constructed and in operation prior to recording. (See RID public rule and KCC 9.04.090) Year 2000 and later subdivisions and short subdivision require minimum improvements be constructed prior to recording / (KCC 19A.130) fl Commercial penn.its require a perfonnance Financial Guarantee for site work if temporary occupancy is requested before Final Construction Approval. [ Construction Deficiency Forms [ Notice of Violation: hourly fee ($460 reinspection fee may apply) . [·./;stop Work: $500 initial penalty, hourly fee [ -{ ,Notice and Order: hourly fee [_-y Civil penalties: Additional $100 to $500 for each: public health risk, environmental damage, history, economic benefit [/J Citations: $100 penalty 11. Bon Financial Guarantee Forfeiture Restoration fmancial guarantee S:CUrrentform\Preconst.wd.12.28.04 Page 5 of7 /• Can be used at any time after notice by King County i erformance financial guarantees • All improvements must be approved within two years from recording/six months after occupancy ) Maintenance/defect financial guarantees o Two-year warrantee period • Repairs must be completed within 30 days • Inspections/release by DNR/DOT 12. Expiration of Approval 13. [A All projects havp an e[_piration date after which the plan approval/issuance is null and void. The expiration date for this project is "I I I 7~·" 1 . Plats and short plats that are recorded do not expire, but must be completed with in 2 years / from recordin{ (J If the project cannot be completed before the expiration date, you must apply for an extension. · Plats • Preliminary plat extensions are not authorized. Short Plats • Preliminary short plat extensions are approved by Land Use Services Division; contact the Engineering Review Section, Platting Unit. Right-of-Way Use Permits • Right-of-Way Use Permits extensions are approved by Land Use Inspection, contact the inspector. Building Permits • Contact the Building Services Division, Inspections Section. Temporary Certificate Of Occupancy (TCO) • Land Use Inspection approval required: Drainage facilities Parking Access Performance Financial Guarantee [YJ/lnitiated by developer at the time project is completed or request for occupancy certificate [.!'/Allow 30 days to inspect and to prepare punchlist [~unchlists are good for 30 days and may be subject to revision upon reinspection after 30 days. hall be made to the punchlist unless directed by the inspection Senior Engineer. [ Inspection and punchlist timelines are subject to staffing level and weather limitations. [ Request reinspection after all punchlist items have been addressed. Otherwise, no changes S:CUrrentform\Preconst.wd.12.28.04 Page 6 of? 14. Specific Notes from Plans 15. Signature As the Owner or Designated Representative (applicant form required), I understand the requirements of King County Land Use Inspection Section procedures and agree to abide by the conditions of the permit and the procedures discussed. Title S:CUrrentform\Preconst.wd.12.28.04 Page 7 of7 •'.• ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest • Web date: 09/09/2005 Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: L Cl '-/J 6 0 O 3 Permit Name: '/</!l,4J /"'114.M Sf> Activity Number: LO S'S/ /().8 FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by DOES. * Signature of Applicant Date Signed -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, fi·w.. /-J..1~ f (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of e.&; ;,; flOl'U'. st b,;;; .. , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing apdress of this corporation/business association is: ~o I v,, i' &M--c <+. S' 11, './ e. [; I ti-0 €(,<, l+ (-1 'KID I I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writin on a form prov'ded DOES. * Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. CertApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 1 of2 <-.• ( NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: D I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes CertApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 0910912005 Page 2 of 2 ..•. ·-la ----.... """" --E. ... .. ----.. --_ ... Site Improvement Borrd Quantity Worksheet ~ ·.._.v· (@ King Cou..ull'llty Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue.Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 . TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Rathinam Short Plat Location: 11634 SE 192nd Street Renton, WA 98075 Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? -~----Yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW76.09} Page 1 of 9 X no For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: . Project No,: Activity No.: 11/11/2004 L04S0003 Note: All prices include labor, equipmen.t, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database.· OK!<-~ {g-q -0 S FINAL 11614Bond Quantity Worksheet.xis Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Untt prices updated: 02/12/02 • Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 ... .,. ' ...l I'" ' ; . ,. I'" .... ' .Jl a ll II 8: a: • l"'""'1 II: II .. ,.., Site Improvement Bohd Quantity Worksheet tEm::)SJONlSEDIMENITTCdNTROli' i Backfill & compaction-embankment Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 Crushed surtacino 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03. 9(3) Ditching ESC-4 Excavation-bulk. ESC-5 f~_ng~. silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 J.NGPE) ESC-7 ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 Mulch, by hand, straw,_3"_d_e."fl __ ESC-10 SWDM 5.4.2.1 ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 ESC-12 ESC-13 ESC-14 ed ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 ESC-16 WSDOT 9· 13.1 (2) Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 _Rock Construction Entrance, 1OO'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 benn section IESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 ESC-25 Water truck, dust control ESC-26 SWDM 5.4.7 wmfief~ltfttiJseeiiiaH&'.l§iffili Iiiil!Hlt!mW%il Page 2of 9 $ 67.51 Each I 11 $ 85.45 CY s 8.08 CY T 201 $ 1.50 CY s 1.38 LF I 4501 $ 1.38 LF $ 0.59 SY I 48001 $ 1.45 SY $ 2.01 SY $ 0.53 SY s 10.70 LF $ 16.10 LF s 20.70 LF $ 2.30 SY s 39.08 CY $ 1,464.34 Each I 11 $ 2,928.68 Each $ 1,949.38 Each $ 17.91 LF I 30/ $ 68.54 LF $ 0.51 SY s 6.03 SY $ 7.45 SY $ 74.75 HR I 61 $ 97.75 HR I sj Each ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: <t<t Cof AO_..,.., r'\,,-.. t.:+.., \Al-..1,....a.. .... -• "'I-",.. __ ,, -·"* ""'-1"11'\t:'~ '''-"' -~-_, ··-·-·· __ _._,, ___ , .. ,.1.1-- ' .... ' -' .... .. - 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 I 11 $ I $ -.., ' ... ' ... .. - ·, _,, 68 162 621 283~ 1464 537 449 782 §,914.25 2,074.28 8,988.53 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 n ___ .... '"'-"-· "'"'"""""'"""" r---, ' .. 1·. ------.• -iii iii. iii •• Site Improvement BqA, Quantity Worksheet '-../' . • • •• J 'ib;~f,1i1!!i11i\ iit:1!::~:;~: 11;~; ~i\~t1:Bi~i~;il:i1 ;!1ni:t L--~ Gl-2 Gl-3 GI· 4 Excavation • bulk I GI· 5 GI-6 Gl-7 6' hlQ!J_ GI· 8 GI· 9 GI· 11 GI· 11 GI· 1~ Gabion. 12" deeo. stone filled mesh GI· 1• Gabion. 18" deeo. stone filled mesh GI· 1' _Gabion, 36" deep, stone filled mesh GI· 1• GI· n GI· H G1·21 GI· 21 GI ·2 GI ·23 ::1ers) GI ·2 ITrail 4• chinnAd wood GI· 25 ITrail 4" crushed cinder GI· 2 Trail 4" ton course GI -2· Wall, retainin!::J, concrete GI ·2 GI ·2 Page 3 of 9 ·Keo ?:l A authortzes·only one bond reduction. 11614Bond Quantity Worbhe<>txla :.r:·.•::.· ... ::-:.·:x :·.s:·.·.·; ~·:: •,•. ·:,•-:,·:~:::.•.·xs,•:,;::::xn: ::.,·x.,,·,:x ·:n::::.:.• ... ,,.,,·:_·,· : -. _· .. _. ·:·,· ·,•::,:. ;,t· .,_...,,::xv $ 8.53 CY $ 0.36 SY $ 8,876.16 Acre I I I I I $ 1.50 CY 4001 600.00 $ 4.06 CY $ 18.55 LF $ 13.44 LF I I I 35ol 4,704.00 $ 1,271.81 Each I 2 2,S43.62i $ 12.12 LF $ 22.57 CY $ 25.48 CY $ 37.85 CY $ 54.31 SY s 74.85 SY $ 132.48 SY $ 2.02 SY $ 0.95 SY I I I 30001 2,850.00 $ 135.13 Each · 1 I 135.13 $ 2.88 Each $ 7.46 SY s 788.26 Day 2 1,576.52 $ 1,556.64 Acre $ 85.18 HR ' . 8 681.44 16 1,362.88 $ 7.59 SY $ 8.33 SY $ 8.19 SY $ 44.16 SF $ 9.49 SF SUBTOTAL 1,243.44 16,582.15 Check out the DDES Web site at www.m,otrnkr..nnvlrlrlAc 2.251 2.251 19,971.361 3502.441 23,473.80 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Q~t'V\,t n'!lfA• A/1')1")(\f\h • ------ ,-xar;~;-·c~---------;~-.. :·;:-·\:;;+?~A:tt:;r··nu;rstFw~;-···:·:;···:-:·:~W'.:·;;:_-_\;;_:_-_:;;;c:_;Yii::·_<:·4:ztt_:;;,:;·::.:.i~[%Ilt-~)tthtAtu:;_i11sx~xrrtti~tt~~P I -·· I I I · I I · I -I I . ,.. Barricade RI -5 l_;!_arricade, type Ill ( Permanent RI -6 Curb & Gutter.!. rolled Rl-7 Qurt> & Gutter.!.vertical ll!...:.! Curb and Gutter1 demolition and di IRl-9 RI -10 fil.:.1.! RI· 12 th ~ RI -14 rice iRI -15 Sealant.!. a Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick RI -16 Sidewalk, 4" thick Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and di Sidewalk.!. 5" thick $idewalk, s• thick, demolition and di RI -241 Page4 of 9 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 116148ond Quanllty WorksheelJds· 23.00 5.75 1.38 41.14 $ 30.03 $ 45.05 $ 13.27 $ 9.69 s 13.58 $ 2.44 $ 2.56 $ 1.85 $ 1.69 $ 0.99 $ - s 7.53 $ 30.52 $ 27.73 $ 34.94 $ 34.65 $ 85.28 $ 5.82 $ 2.38 $ 0.25 SUBTOTAL :;y SY 1100 6,325.00 SY SY LF LF 45.05 LF 200 2,654.00 LF 280 2,713.20 LF LF LF LF 360 666.00 LF LF 360 356.40 SY SY SY 250 7,630.00 SY SY 100 3.494.00 SY Each Each SF LF · 360 90.00 17,780.60 6,193.05 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metr9kc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 ' A ,. .., ~ •• r ,. .• -' :~:~I-:~•. & ~1 LJ Site Improvement Bq~ Quantity Worksheet \ ! -.....,· r ' ' T .. T ... ,.. , j ' j I. A l j :J ";lllllll1!l&l1!\ l~~iiliillif ~ill1iilll11111l1ll11 lf 1&1' ~&%~MiW~%tttNM@@WWHMffW?f%1tM@faf f-P~~m #O;uW \~GW1f@MNki¢6St?fW::;m=.:::~ ·· ·····.w.,w.w.,· ,.-., ......... fa\TIE@l~\1\\~~l~iliiltl~ For KCRS '93 1 {additional 2.5" base AC Overlay, 1.5" AC RS-2 $ 7.39 AC Overlav, 2' AC RS-3 $ 8.75 AC Road, 2", 4• rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 $ 17.24 AC Road, 2-, 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500SY RS-5 $ 13.36 AC Road, 3• 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-6 $ 19.69 AC Road 3 • 4 • rock Qtv. over 2500 S' RS-7 $ 15.81 AC Road, 5', First 2500 SY RS-8 $ 14.57 ,Ac Rqa_d, 6' Otv. Over 2500 SY RS-9 $ 13.94 1S • 1 $ 16.76 1S • 1 $ 16.12 1S • 1 $ 9.21 1S -1 $ 11.41 1S • 1 $ 7.53 =is -1 $ 21.51 IPCC Road, 6" no base, over 2500 SY IRS -1 $ 21.87 !Thickened Edoe IRS -1 $ 6.89 Page 5 of 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC Z7 A au1horlzes only one bond reduction. .. •o• Alb--..1 "'··---· IAl-..1--~--• .~-. SY I 1000 7,390.00 SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY LF 300 _2,067.00 7,390.00 _:!_,067.00 ,..'"' __ ,.. __ ..,. "4-r,r1elf!I "''-'-_, ... __ .,. .. -·-·· --~-•~---··'JJ-- Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 n.:.--~ I"\-•-· 4,,.,.,,,..,,.,,,.,,-c- ,,,...--., ~ ~ --------liiliiiii liiiiil llliiiiii'Bi liiiiill lliiliii -----Site Improvement Bq.~ Quantity Worksheet '-...,,' --J ~!l!U!!!!~~~ I - ~~I~~·-· .. · ~·~_ifi1~W.~.· 4@i4f.@gi~h#.&(F~~-c·(f_\~£A(·<~·-:·t 0 ";i~~@~~~fu~d~~:-kv.tt~~wkf~~s@Jtba£.Gi~~t;~1~~;it~~iti;fu;;,::~;: Access Road, RID 0-1 $ 16.74 Bollards • fixed D-2 $ 240.74 Bollards -removable 0-3 $ 452.34 • {CBs include frame and lldl ~BT .. = I 0-4 $ 1.257.64 ~BT·-"'IL 0-5 $ 1 433.59 [CB T= II 48' diameter 0-6 .$ 2033.57 for additional d"'nth over 4' 0-7 CB Tun.a 11, 54" diameter . 0-8 for additional d•"-"th over 4' 0-9 CB Tu ...... II 60" diameter 0-10 for additional deoth over 4' 0 • 11 CB T"ne II 72" diameter 0-12 for additional deoth over 4' 0-13 Throuoh-curb Inlet Framework {Addl 0-14 Cleano•tt PVC, 4• 0-15 Cteanout, PVC 6" D-16 Cleanout PVC, a· 0-17 Culvert. PVC, 4 • D-18 Culvert. PVC, 6" 0-19 Culvert. PVC,. a· 0-20 "ulvert. PVC 12" 0-21 ...;ulvert. CMP, a· 0-22 Culvert, CMP 12' 0-23 Culvert CMP, 15" 0-24 Culvert, CMP, 18" 0 -25 Culvert, CMP 24" 0-26 Culvert, CMP, 30" D -27 Culvert, CMP 36" D -28 Culvert. CMP 48' 0 -29 Culvert. CMP, 60" 0 • 30 Culvert, CMP, 72" 0-31 Page 6 of 9 *KCC 27 ~ authorizes only one bond reduction. 1161413ond Quantity WorkllMetxls · $ 436.52 $ 2.192.54 $ 486.53 $ 2,351.52 $ 536.54 $ 3,212.64 $ 692.21 $ 366.09 $ 130.55 $ 174.90. $ . 224.19 $ 8.64 $ 12.60 $ 13.33 $ 21.77 $ 17.25 $ 26.45 $ 32.73 $ 37.74 $ 53.33 $ 71.45 $ 112.11 $ 140.83 $ 235.45 $ 302.58 SUBTOTAL SY 120 2,008.80 Each Each 3 1,357.02 Each I 4 5,030.56 4 5,030.56 Each Each _g_,oss.571 FT Each 2,192.54 FT Each FT Each FT Each Each Each Each LF LF LF LF LF LF I LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF 5,030.56 12,622.49 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddss 6 1p49.40 1,049.40 Untt prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/W02 Report Data: 4/12/2005 fiiilJI [· . • • r ' A A r ' . ' j ' Site Improvement Bq.=:j Quantity Worksheet ·~ ~· -~-J: 1~:~;1fe15.t~111a!i!i~1r1t!!K~11i.!i.,:11•. :-c:f@.Wm~ ~~%~-~:dW1@F~:~~mmm·ww~~MfltiMmjmfp~{i, :~~UnlH }badHfhmrnNi~$t\ft%:A nG$¥rithH~~#&t~mtttMt hOGahti#~mMWW,£SL lcutvert Concrete, 8" · 0-32 ~ 21.02 Culvert. COncrete 12• D-33 $ 30.05 Culvert. Concrete, 15" D-34 $ 37.34 Culvert Concrete 1 s• D-35 $ 44.51· Culvert Concrete, 24• D-36 $ 61.07 Culvert. Concrete ·so· D-37 $ 104.18 Cufvert Concrete. 36" D-38 $ 137.63 Culvert. Concrete 42" D·39 $ 158.42 Culvert. Concrete 48" D • 40 $ 175.94 Culvert. CPP 6' D-41 $ 10.70 ,Culven CPP, 8' D-42 $ 16.10 Culvert, CPP 12' D-43 $ 20.70 Culvert. CPP 15" D-44 $ 23.00 Culvert. CPP 18' D-45 $ 27.60 Culvert. CPP 24' D·46 $ 36.80 Culvert. CPP 30" D-47 $ 48.30 Culvert. CPP, 36' D-48 $ 55.20 Ditchlna D-49 $ 8.08 Flow "'•=rsal Trench (1,436 base+) D-50 $ 25.99 French Drain (3' death) D-51 $ 22.60 Geotextile. laid in trench nnlvnronvtene D· 52 $ 2.40 Infiltration pond testi= D· 53 $ 74.75 Mid-tank Access Riser. 48" dia 6' dee[ D-54 $ 1,605.40 Pond Overflow Soillwav D-55 $ 14.01 Restrictor/Oil Sanarator, 12" D-56 $ 1,045.19 Restrictor/Oil SAnarator. 15" D-57 $ 1,095.56 Restrictor/Oil Seoarator. 18" D • 58 $ 1146.16 RinrAn, [)]aced D-59 $ 39.08 ,Tank End Reducer (36· diameter) D-60 $ 1,000.50 Trash Rack 12' D-61 $ 211.97 Trash Rack. 15' D· 62 $ 237.27 Trash Rack. 1a· D-63 $ 268.89 ,Trash Rack, 21' . ·o. 64 $ 306.84 Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL ·Kee Zl A authorizes only one bond reduction. 1' 1R1ARnnA n.-... Hh1 ~...._.. ...... .,a... LF .LF LF LF LF I I LF. LF LF LF LF LF LF I 365 7555.5 313 6479.1 LF LF LF LF LF CY LF LF SY HR Each SY Each 1 1045.19 Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each 7555.5 7524.29 A.1..--•--. ..a.&L •....... ___ .,, ----.,, .__, 1~0,1:~m1,:!:B&~ '.~-t,~~-it21:w.r:a0r11 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 __... ----------·------.. Site Improvement Bo,e1 Quantity Worksheet . '-_..,' -.. . ..,,. J Bf 0::s:1wis:t·2~1a11, lil!. 12" AC 2' too course rock & 4" borrow. PL-1 $ 15.84 SY 12• AC 1.5" too course & 2.5" base cou PL-2 $ 17.24 SY ,4* select borrow PL-3 $ 4.55 SY 11.s• top course rock & 2.5" base course PL -4 1 11.41 SY ·Jiptf<r?t·J{;:T}"•-r?Y zwif f >~--··,,diAt<r V>->h":}M}t·,:·"· .. ~c·hJ{k,.. __ ·y3g:_. :.H> _<L ~r:«/;.(~~---":**h\ :.A?.>4\ T''>!\" ··::_··~-"W\"'if·~/:J·t\}=Y;>.~-:,·_:·:-;:,_··:: :fi''· .,_. ><<,v· ~:cdxr\:~·-}fr- Page 8 of 9 vaults.ll !,IQ. WI-1 Each WI ·2 SY Wl-3 CY Wl-4 LF Wl-5 Ff Wl-6 ~ Wl-8 Wl-9 WJ.10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL(SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL! COLUMN: .3~000.10 44,988.98 11,700.03 13,496.69 50,700.13 58,485.67 8 C ·Kee 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614Bond Quantity Wo~ Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddps 24,523.20 7,356.96 31,880.16 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - ----~ -... ----im -m ----r , l .. • . . . - _.., Site Improvement Bo~ Quantity Worksheet -"'· -, , __ ., Original bond computations prepared by: -Name: Hal P. Grubb Date: 2/1 0/2005 PE Registration Number: 23975 Tel.#: (425) 251-6222 Firm Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South Project No: L04S0003 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) PERFORMANCE BOND" AMOUNT (A) $ 8,988.5 Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (B) $ 50,700.1 Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities (C) $ 58,485.7 Private Improvements (D) $ 31,880.2. Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond*/" (A+B) $ 59,688.7 (First $7,500 ol bond* shall be cash.) .,......---.... Performance Bonct• Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL (T) · Reduced Performance Bond* Total ••• Maintenance/Detect Bond• Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BONO· REDUCTION: BONO"AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY••• (E) ~$~~~~~~ T x0.30 $ 45,016.3 OR (T·E) $ 150,054.5 Use larger of. Tx30% or fl ·E) Date: • NOTE: The word "bond~ as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. -NOTE:_ KCC 27A a~orizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND· (B+C) x 0.25 = $ 27,296.5 The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be r~flected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilizatiOn costs are computed In this quantity . ._ NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount m or as revised b ma or design changes. SURETY.BOND RIDER NOTE: II a bond rider is used, minimum additional performance bond shall be $ 90,365.8 (C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND" AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY ODES Page 9 of 9 Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 11614Bond Quantity Worksheet.xis Untt prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 ReDort Date: 4/12/2005 • soc Meins, Mike From: Mark Hilfer [mhilfer@charterhomesinc.com) Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:53 PM To: Meins, Mike Subject: Re: Rathinam Wednesday at 1000 is good. Everything is in except the street trees. Thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Meins, Mike <Mike.Meins@kingcounty.gov> To: Mark Hilfer Sent: Thu May 08 14:49:02 2008 Subject: RE: Rathinam Mark- Page I of 2 I could meet you out at the site later next week. Wednesday morning at 10:00am? Right now my calendar is flexible for later in the week. so let me know ifwe need to adjust that. The recreation area equipment and landscaping for that area, and the pond plantings and shrubs have been installed, is that correct? Is there any replacement trees installed? How about the street trees? Thanks, Mike Meins. Engineer II mi kc. me i ns@k i ngcount y .gov 206.296.6678 . From: Mark Hiller lmailto:mhi\Jer@chartcrhomesinc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 08. 2008 9:00 AM To: Mcins, Mike Subject: Rathinam Mike. I would like to request a final inspection for bond# 442247 installation of recreational equipment and landscaping. Please kt me know when this will lake place I would like to be there. Thank you! Mark Hiller I.and Development Supcrintcndant Charter Homes Inc. www .Chartcrhomcsinc.com 206-322-4393 Ofllce 206-755-9798 Cell 253-872-5285 Fax 05/08/2008 \r-ees? soc Page I of I Meins, Mike From: Mark Hilfer [mhilfer@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:00 AM To: Meins, Mike Subject: Rathinam Mike, I would like to request a final inspection for bond# 442247 installation of recreational equipment and landscaping. Please let me know when this will take place I would like to be there. Thank you! Mark Hilfer Land Development Superintendant Charter Homes Inc. www.Charterhomesinc.com 206-322-4393 Office 206-755-9798 Cell 253-872-5285 Fax mhilfer@charterhomesinc.com 05/14/2008 Pra , Jeff From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Carol, Pray, Jeff Friday, November 30, 2007 10:46 AM DDES, FGMU Meins, Mike; 'bthompson@charterhomesinc.com'; VanPatten, Steve Rathinam SP L04S0003 -recreation/landscape bond amount There are some conflicting amounts in the file for the approved bond quantity amount for the Rathinam SP rec tract. The tract approval letter has a $14K+ figure and Mike came up with a $28K+ figure that appears on the Request to Record. However, the bond quantity worksheet attached to the approved plan has an amount of $30,595.50. To facilitate progress toward bond preparation for recording today, please revise the required rec tract landscape bond amount to $30,595.50 per the developer's request to me this morning. I will provide a corrected Request to Record and bond worksheet reflecting the amount. Thanks, Jeff I I ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 6, 2006 H. Bruce McCrory Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72"d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Sharmila Rathinam (DOES File No. L04S0003) Recreation/Landscape Activity No. L05MI076 Dear Mr. McCrory: This is in response to your March 10, 2006 request for approval of the landscape and recreation space plan for the plat of Cavanaugh. We have reviewed your March, 2006,·submitlal, and with the following conditions and additions, approve it as submitted: 1. The equipment (structures, benches, picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways shall be installed from the sidewalk to the play areas. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. Street trees, significant tree retention shall be reviewed with the engineering plans and are not part of this approval. A revised recreation/landscape plan may be required, in the event modifications are made to the significant retention plan. Note that trees within recreation tracts are associated with the significant tree plan and are not included in the recreation/landscape bond. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the borid (two tracts) has been established at $14,379.30. This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, etc. The bond amount includes a thirty:percent contingency, fencing, picnic table and bench. Note that this approval does not include street trees or significant trees. This will be reviewed in conjunction with the engineering plans. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of an installation inspection and a maintenance inspection. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. ' -~, . . At the time of inspection by the Land Use Inspection Section, if the improvements are fully installed per the approved plan, the performance financial guarantee may be reduced. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-6792. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Stacy Graves, Financial Guarantee Management Unit at (206) 296-7009. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, ·c~ect Manager Ill Current Planning Section, LUSD Cc: Kim Claussen, Project Manager Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD w/encs Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, LUSD w/encs FGMU File w/encs soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 June 8, 2005 Summarv of Char!!es and Payments Applicant: RA THINAM, SHARMILA 24006 SE I 0TH ST SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 Charges Description 425-369-2198 Counter Service Fees Deposit Based on Est Hrs SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Pa ments Description Check# SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Payee Date Entered Page 1 of 1 L05Sl130 L04S0003 INSPECT OPEN Amount $102.64 $2,608.20 $2,710.84 Amount $0.00 $2,7i0.84 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 PROJECT NAME: ~ 1,JA ,:-\ )~ Web date: 07/02/2007 LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM ~'I~'< ~Mr~ 5 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. DDES PROJECT #: --"'\,,'--o_lf_,___,,S'---O_o_ro~;>"-------- ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: PH ONE: ~2occ?::c.:6..__l::JLJ-5_,._(. _,d'.k"-"'-;'-c'f1---- Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surface parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been property maintained (21A 16.180). A landscape maintenance Inspection deposit is required prior to pennit issuance to cover .the costs of the 2-year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit Is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected. UNl'f PR.ICE · UNITT:VP~ · .. ·. 1 Cll!J4Nl'ITY . .· P~)CE · SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ FT) HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) • <f't '"',.~,.\,," ' ,-,,.. ""'~ ..... I' .. •,., ' ... ,,. . .. " SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4,00 SY (SQUARE YARD) t-(,. l () 'f C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 ' SY (SQUARE YARD) D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) -~ ·.·, '":, .... · ~. . . .,•_-' . . PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75 -2.00" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST & LABOR \t 4-5°00 PERIMETER & PARKING AREAS 1.5-1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST & LABOR INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED l.ANOSCAPING ... . . . ---·· . ··-· ...... .... ,, .... ··--· .. ' .. -.. B. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST & LABOR '~" ·-. . .• C.SHRUBS $35.00 EACH COST & LABOR ---. .. ''"'' _,, D. GROUND COVER $4.00 EACH COST & LABOR SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: $ 4'604' LandscapeBondQuantityFORM.doc b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2 MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES FENCING: SOLID WOOD CEDAR BERMING IRRIGATION RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36" BALL 60" BALL RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12" BALL 24" BALL ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Onsite recreation facilities SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR LINEAR FOOT $28.50 INCLUDES LABOR $17.50 LINEAR FOOT INCLUDES LABOR 80¢ SQUARE FOOT $260.00 EACH $920.00 EACH $26.00 EACH $33.00 EACH Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in accordance with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOTAL BOND PRICE Revised LBQW 11/13/2002 BOND SUB TOTAL: $ 4(.. 5~. fa 30 % CONTINGENCY: $ \ ~CJ. ~v __ :....:,_..:_ __ -JI TOTAL BON~"11.,c:: ~ f_Co1~1.vv ') Check out the ODES Web site at www.kinqcounty.gov/permits land sea pe Bond Qua ntityF ORM .doc b-wks-landscapebq .pdf 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2 soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 June 8, 2005 Page 1 of 1 Summary of Char2:es and Pavments Applicant: RA THINAM, SHARMILA 24006 SE I 0TH ST SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 Charges Description 425-369-2198 Counter Service Fees Deposit Based on Est Hrs SUB TOT AL CHARGES: Pavments Description Check # SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid Payee Activity Number: L05Sil29 Project Number: L04S0003 Development Number: Permit Type: INSPECT Status: · · OPEN Date Entered Amount $102.64 $2,608.20 $2,710.84 Amount $0.00 $2,710.84 M1 ~ T~ !r-J?~ ~~"';>0/L 5/14-/ O'i!J M . )l,ti.6t ,-..J:::, The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON IPILANNING/BUILDING/PUBLlfC WORKS MJEMOR·ANDUM August 4, 2009 Laureen Nicolay, Planning Amber Hoffman, Dev. Serv. Carrie K. Olson, Plan Review x7235 C.O Rathlnam Short Plat L04S0003 Laureen: Please find a copy of the agreemenfand bonflisted below for your information. Amber: Please find attached the original agreemenfand boncffor the above short plat that was forwarded to the City of Renton from King County as part of the Benson Hill Annexation. Agreement to Install & Maintain Significant Trees Agreement to Install & Maintain Street Trees cc: File King County Dep11rtn1cnt of Development and E11~·lro11111cntal Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055,1219 APPLICANT'S Name Uart= lh=c r~. ACTIVITY Number A07BN404 Guarantee Amount $6,000 APPL.A.CANT'S A~ <;:I;it.J<_ c arr~r · Project Number and Name L04S0003 -Rathinam Short Plat Site Location/Section Parcel .6198400180 ..... This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this S""" -day of ::Oot:QM,,f 'bt.r , 20 ..'.QJ' between the King County Dep~ment of Development and Environmental Services (or its successor agency), hereinafter called the COUNTY, and the above named applicant, hereinafter called APPLICANT. Basis for AGREEMENT: WHEREAS the undersigned APPLICANT wishes to develop the above-referenced project, and WI-IEREAS the COUNTY will grant final plat approval upon agreement by the APPLICANT to, among other project requirements, comply with all terms ofthis AGREEMENT; NOW TIIEREFORE, the Ai'l'LICANT hereby agrees and binds itself and it's legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: Terms of the AGREEMENT: I. Prior to recording of the subdivision, the APPLICANT shall provide the COUNTY with a financial guarantee in the amount and in a fom1 approved by the COUNTY in order to secure the APPLICANT'S compliance with tcnns of this AGREEMENT. The guarantee shall remain in force and effect until written release by the COUNTY. lbe Al'l'LICANT's obligation to perform work and pay fees or other amounts is not limited to the amount of the associated financial guarantee. 2. 'Ille APPLICANT shall, within two years of the final plat approval, install all required street trees in full compliance with the approved landscape development plans, including any 11pprovcd amendments thereto. Street trees shall be planted and completed in conformance with the approved phms and specifications and the COUNTY Stand11rds. All planting shall be performed in accordance with accepted practices, in good soil with adequate water available. ·111e Al'l'LJCANT shall notify the COUNTY in writing when all street trees ll!C implemented in accordance with approved plans. 3. ·me County must approve (in writing) w1y APPLICANT proposed change of work from the approved plans prior to the APPLICANT beginning such work. 4. The APPLICANT shall fulfill 3[! ocher requirements of King County Code Title 21A, and adopted ordinances in connection with street tree impro\'emenL~. even if these requirements arc nnt set forth specifically in this AGREEMENT. 5. ·11,e APPLICANT shall complete 111! street tree instal!ution work requirements with due diligence. The COUNTY may extend the time limit for compliance up to six months when the COUNTY has determined that circumstances beyond the control of the APPLICANT warrant an extension. 6. The financial guarantee shall be miuired for a minimum period oftwo years after King County has inspected and approved the planting or transplanting of trees. This time period may be extended by one year by the director, if necessruy, to cover a planting and growing season. 7. The street trees shall successfully grow and remain attractive, free of disease and defects in workmanship and materials for a period of two years from lhc dute of satisfactory installation. The Al'l'LICANT shall prune and trim all street trees to maintain: a healthy growing condition or to prevent primary limb failure and replace all dead, diseased, damaged or stolen trees within three months or during the next planting season if the loss does not occur in a planting season. 10 If, al the conclusion of the two-year period, the COUNTY, at its sole discretion, determines that the street trees arc not in a well-maintained condition, the APPLICANT or Guarnnlor shall perform prompt and adequate maintenance, ln the event this maintenance is not done, by either the APPLICANT or Guarnnlor, within u time period as specified by the COUNTY, the Guarantor shall, upon demand, tender the total guarantee amount to the COUNTY. After performing the maintenance, the COUNTY will return any unexpended funds, without interest, to the Guarantor. I!. The APPLICANT shall he obligtilcd tu take corrective action or make repairs, as described above, which obligation shall not be limited by the amount of the financial guarantee. \2. The Al'l'I.ICANT shall reimburse the COUNTY for all•actual direct and indirect cost~ necessitated by this AGREEtTENT including but not limited to plan review and inspection fees purswuit to Title 27 A of the King County Code and corrective work or abatement. 13. The APPLICANT hereby grant.~ the COUNTY the right lo enter and inspect the project site and, in the event of any failure to comply with terms of this AGREEMENT, to implement such corrective measures as the COUNTY deems necessary. [ 4. '['he Al'l'[.JCANT shall be responsible for the prnper perfonnance, safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the project. This responsibility shall not be lessened or otherwise am:cted by the County's approval of plans, specifications, or work, or by the presence al the work site of the County's reprcscntativc(s), or by the compliance by the Al'l'LICANT with any requests made by said representative(s). ! 5. The Al'l'LlCANT shall indemnif)' and hold the COUNTY and it's agents, employees and/or officers harmless from and shall process and defend at it's own expense all claims, damages, suits al law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against the COUNTY arising out oJ; in connection with, or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the Applicant's performance or failure to perform any aspect of the AGREEMENT. Provided, however, that if such claims arc caused by or result from concurrent negligence ofthe APPLICANT and the COUNTY, it's agents, crnployL'CS and/or onicers, this provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the APPLICANT, and provided further, that nothing herein shall require the APPLICANT to hold hwmless or defend the COUNTY from any claim arising from the sole negligence of the County's agents, employees and/or officers. 16, In the event that any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction situated in King County, Washington. 17. It is the APPLICANT'S responsibility to notify King County of any change in address, phone number, or change of ownership of property. It is the Al'l'UCANT'S responsibility to arrange for replacement of any/all financial guarantees prior to the time that a change of ownership occurs. The Applicant, as indicated in thiS AGREEMENT, shali remain responsible for all terms of the agreement until such time as a new owner shaH replace the financial guaruntees and complete any other documents as required by the County. RELEASE REQUIREMENTS: This AGREEMENT shall remain in effect and the associated financial guarantee shall not be released until all terms of this AGREE/\tENT have been completed to the satisfaction of the COUNTY. s hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and yell! first above written. By c::::~ s::::, ~ '::,.,, --·F:::::::C? Received for the COUNTY hy A07BN404 w King County King County Dep11rlmenl ofDenlopmenl and En,·ironmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 980S5-l2l9 Financial Guarantee Activity No. A07BN404 Name of Project Rathinam Short Plat Location/Address of Project Parcel6198400180 Projecl No. L04S0003 ----------------------- Bond No. Bond Amount 0442248 $6,000 We Omter Ibre3, Irr..' , as Principal and Intermtim31 Fi.d:ili.ty Insuran:e O:.rrpiiy a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of N3.i" Jersey and legally doing business in the State of Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto King County, State of Washington, as Obligcc, in the penal sum of Six Thousand and 0/100 dollars for lhe payment of which we firmly bind ourselves, and our legal representatives, successors and assigns,jointly and severally. THE CONDITION OF OBLIGATION is that: 1. The Principal has executed an "Agreement" entitled "Agreement to Install & Maintain Street Trees for a Subdivision", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Under the provisions of the Agreement, the Principal is required to furnish a guarantee to secure the Principa!'s compliance with the terms of the Agreement. 3. This Surety Bond is intended to secure the Principals' performance of work and payment of fees in accordance with the associated Agreement. IT IS FURTHER EXPRESSLY PROVIDED that: l. Until \Vritten release of this obligation by King County, this bond may nol be terminated or cancelled by the Principal or Surety for any reason. 2. The obligation of the Surety shall not be discharged or affected by any extension of time for the Principal's performance of this Agreement or by any amendment of the engineering plans used for construction of the project. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such extension or amendment. The obligation or the Surety shall, in no event, exceed the penal sum hereof unless the Surety has expressly consented to any change, modification or extension of the Agreement and has issued its \.Witten adjustment of the penal sum, signed by the Principal and Surety. 3. Upon failure of the Principal to pcrfonn any of the tenns of the Agreement, The Surety shall either perform the terms of the Agreement or shall tender to the County the amount which the County estimates necessary to effect compliance \Vith the terms of the Agreement. The County estimate may not be challenged or otherwise disputed by the Principal or Surety. Any funds provided by the Surety in excess of that expended to remedy noncompliance with the Agreement will be returned to the Surety upon completion of the remedial work and payment of outstanding fees. 4. In the event that this project becomes part of an incorporated area, King County may transfer its rights and obligations under this Surety Bond and the associated Agreement to any successor jurisdiction without notice to the Surety or Principal. The rights and obligations under this Surety Bond arc for the exclusive benefit of King County. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the rights and obligations of King County under this Surety Bond may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred for any purpose. It is the PRINCIPAL'S (as APPUCANT in attached Agreement) responsibility to notify King County of any change in nddress, phone number, or change of ownership of property. It is the PRINCIPAL.'S responsihility to arrange for replacement of any/all financial guarantees prior to the time that II change of ownership occurs. The PRINCIPAL shall remain responsible for all terms of the agreement until such time as a new owner shall replace the financial guarantees and cnmjllete any other documcnls as required by the County. Page I of2 • Page 2 of2 PRI~ Crart:er ' In:. By: Date SURETY: In~~icml F.iMity fu=arce Caipany fy,u)'{ __ ~rvur::dI11 o uay 12/5/07 12/5/07 Signature Dair Title Title Attmrey-in-Fact Mailing Addrm l\1ailir1g Atldrrss (DI lhim Street Suite 5100 '6'lttle, WA 98101 '6'lttle WA 981.11-0370 20,-322--4:.m Phone Number l'ho11c Number PLEASE ATTACH A POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SURETY AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING FOR Tille PRINCIPAL Stutc of Washington, County of King I certify that I know or have seen satisfactory evidence that rYl ~ ...-k-/_...,~ Y"'- signed this instrument and acknowledges it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. (Notnry Seal or Stamp for Principal) Old \'2-,o,Sol a e : ------'---'--------------- Signature of Notary Public: -~~~-=,bl-~~· ~c;,~-~'-7'"\'1"--- Titlc: ___ {\{_,_' _&_r-_, -'.,;-_P_~_h_-G~·-"---__________ _ My appointment expires: __ l~o~._f _Z-_"'~[_0 _'6 _______ _ Financial Guarantee Activity Number:. ___ _ SURETY.doc (10199) ,.~,.f1F}(<. ,.?:).<t -':' >-s., .s:·· _'\ ,:.:i)i //<'., . ,:·x:~\/(:~· /ii\,:. :;-!\.:-.,. ,.;<~Si.:''.t-s:z ,.),{L,:,. ,<'~:ti.t_ ,,s:.\,1 ::::,·· KNOW1A.LL MEN BY ~E P~SE~S;_:··'!'_h!1t ~NTE~~TI~.NAL'FIDELltj' i~~URJ\NC~ co¥P~~t\cofP~:'ati?'.n o(g'a'rtizfq.ili<f:~:illsting,:t'<·\ ,: laws of the 5tate of.New Jer.iey;and havmg Jts pnnc1pal office.m the Cuy of Newark, New Jer.iey,<does hereby constiru.re and appomt ",;, Ai.:· .,,. ··· ;s: ·/\···\r··--··:f:··'.{.:··· ... :.·\··--'·\/:····;\i····'.'.i,:··:·)··;}:'.':.: .. ) .. "·\r·:~:·--':;( .. ·:}i""·:.::-··:··:·:>··'d\······f>:····;·.>···j;;/·:{~!··f .. ··;;J/·::!.:i'.;~:·~\··\t···;ii ·-tf;--···\"" ?·i . r ;.',j '.t,11).RY~.o.DOBBS, .HEATHER ALLEN;STEYEN W., PALMER( DAYID;J. FO~SYT\I: HOLL)' E:,U,(',FE,~S~\ I'. 1 ·ROXANNPALACIOS ~-? · '" '1i ·:; 1 ~; ~A ? : 0) :1t !·. /; ' -.. .. . .. ' ', '., ... ,· ...... '' ' " \ ~i~iij~1i~~:;::i~rJ~ii~i~iii~i:i~i.~~t~i~~fii~i"(iif"ii""ifiii~ii·;r~i5i~~if:~~~jj"ij"i~~i.·t~~~~·1i~~:ra~ii:;·iiiif;if~0/~~iiii;:~ the e:ilccution of such lnstmment(s)' in pursuance."of these presents, ·sha [, be· as binding'upon. the sa_id. lNTERNATIONAL FIDELITY· INSURANCE C(_)~ANY; as fully and .amply, to .all·. ime11ts a11d purpose~, as if th~ same. had·be~f!.dUly executed and ackno_w1edged,by its. regularly e!ect<;t! officers. at .its pnnc1pa\office.... ·. ·, . · · · , .. ,·. . ,/ ., .... : ,, ,·,, (· .' J. ·;· . , ; ': · · This 'Pow~r of Attorney is· exe'cuted, and 1llay be rcvOked, pursulm m and by' authOrity of Article '3-Sect!o~· J,'.c:ir the,.BY-Laws ·~~.opred b} ·me Bolrd ~f Directors of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE cm,1PANYat a meeting called and held on the 7th day ofFebruary,·1974. , ~ ," , ,, • ' ", ' .c ·:. • .. ,: / ' ' :. . '. ,' • ::; ':.· The President_Or any Vice Prcsidcn't,,faecutive Vice·President, Secretary ._or Assista.nt Secreta.rJ, s~~l! h3'.ve P?we? ~~. a~·thoricy (I) To appoint Anorn;ys-m-fact, and to. authorize them to execute On bebalf of thC Com~~ny, and atcich thC;S~at'of th'e Compan/ thCrcro," bonds arid undertakings, cO.(!trnCts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and, (2i T6 remove, at any· time, ariy rnch attorney-in-fact and revoke the authority given. Further, this PoWer of Anorney is signed. and sealed by facsimile pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors ~·r s:iiil Company adoPted at a meeting duly called and held on the 29th day of Apnl, 1982 of which the following is a !rue e:ilcerpt: Now therefore· the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of at1011ley or_ ariy ce"rtifica1e relating thereto by facsimile, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile s1gnarures or facsimile seal shall be valid and bmdmg upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. IN TESTIMONY WHHRE.OP, INTERNATIONAL J<'IDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY has caused 1his instrument !o be signed and its corporate sea! to be afth.ed by its authorized officer, this 29~ day of Aogusl, A.D. 2003. STATE OP NEW JERSEY County of Essex ~-·-"~.c~ ~ .. swi?~. ~~fitb~ h~a;s ,%/J::esi~ 2 d 0 e~~rii;;! 0!~ ~~~~~~1S~}R~~~i~~~:ho e~uJ~X;.ro~tttlB1:~r}\'1\rS~cTll~~in~~~~~lN"v:~~t ~!nfe~Yaffi~e~u~ said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company: that the said Corporate Seal and·his signature were duly affi:iled hy order of the Board of Directors of saidCompany. .. , , · , . ~ ' , .. '. '·''·· ) ' hereunto·set·my hatir.1 this ,('.:' ··,\ r:,:: .":,/ ~' KingCQunty Department orDevtloprncnl and Environmental Sen·ices 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-12!9 APPLICANT'S Name Giarter lbres, Ire. ACTIVITY Number A07BN41l Guarantee Amount $14,769 ._.,n :(R.'·?,:~r.r ··t~~",.!:-'~~-~:::-' ,-'.rAGREEM~.~T;;TO ·INSTAIH.';&'. ' · ;M~INTAIN'SICfNiFICANf,tREES,' "' y·; 'FOR'iSUBDIViSION~.:)' ' ~ _-,_ .•. (•· ~. ~ -:.,!.·'.\· •. ,. r't _ • .,.,..-.·~· .:.,~ APPLICANT'S Ad~ress t,;;7: J'l'--,5/d,:j 4'~ l.,.,,t..J0'4 • :>-'t'T/.e. /.k. '91[/C)I Project Number and Name L04S0003-Rathinarn Short Plat Site Location/Section Parcel 6198400180 .... This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this-.!.....:_ day of :]2c2£.l-4 \ia.t....-, 20~ between the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (or its successor agency), hereinafter called the COUNTY, and the above named applicant, hereinafter called APPLICANT. Basis for AGREEMENT: WHEREAS the undersigned APPLICANT wishes to develop the above-referenced project, and WHEREAS the COUNTY will grant final plat approval upon agreement by the APPLICANT to, among other project requirements, comply with all terms of this AGREEMENT; NOW H-IEREFORE, the APPLICANT hereby agrees and binds itself and it's legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: Terms of the AGREEMENT: 1. Prior to recording of the subdivision, the APPLICANT shall provide the COUNTY with a financial guarantee in the amount and in a form approved by the COUNTY in order to secure the APPLICANT's compliance with terms of this AGREEMENT. The guarantee shall remain in force and effect until written release by the COUNTY. The APPLICANT's obligation to perfonn work and pay fees or other amounts is not limited to the amount of the associated financial guarantee. 2. The APPLICANT shall, within two years of the final plat approval, install all required significant trees in full compliance with the approved landscape development plans, inclllding any approved amendments thereto. Significant trees shall be planted and completed in conformru1ce with the approved Significant Tree Retention plans and specifications and the COUNTY Standards. A!l planting shall be performed in accordance with accepted practices, in good soil with adequate water available. The APPLICANT shall notify the COUNn' in writing when all significant trees are implemented in accordance with approved Significru1t Tree Retention plans. 3. 'Ilic County must approve (in writing) any APPLICANT proposed change of work from the approved Significant Tree Retention plans prior to the APPLICANT beginning such work. 4. The APPLICANT shall fulfill all other requirements of King County Code Title 21 A, and adopted ordinances in connection with significant tree improvements, even if these requirements are not set forth specifically in this AGREEMENT. 5. The APPLICANT shall complete all signlficru1t tree instu!lation work requirements with due diligence. The COUNTY may extend the time limit for compliance up lo six months when the COUNTY has determined that circumstances beyond the control of the APPLICANT warrant an extension. 6. The financial guarantee shall be required for a minimum period of two years after King Coumy has inspected and approved the planting or transplanting of trees. This time period may he extended by one year by the director, if necessary, to cover a planting and growing season. 7. The significant trees shall successfully grow and remain aurnctive, free of disease and defects in workmanship and materials for a period of two years from the date ofsatisfoctory installation. The APPLICANT shall prune and trim all significant trees to maintain: a healthy growing condifrm or to prevent primary limb failure and replace all dead, diseased, damaged or stolen frees within three months or during the next planting season if the loss does not occur in a planting season. 10. If, at the conclusion of the two-year period, the COUNTY, at its sole discretion, dctennines that the significant trees are not in a well-maintained condition, the APPLICANT or Guarantor shall perfonn prompt and adequate maimcnance. In the event this maintenance is not done, by either the APPLICANT or Guurnntor, within a time period as specified by the COUN1Y, the Guarantor shall, upon demand, tcndc1· thc lolal guarantee amount to the COUNTY. After performing the maintenance, the COUNTY will return any unexpended funds, without interest, to the Guarantor. 11. The APPLICANT shall be obligated to take corrective action or make repairs, as described above, which obligation shall not be limited by the amount of the financial guarantee. 12. The APPLICANT sha!J reimburse the COUNTY for all-actual direct and indirect costs necessitated by this AGREEMENT including but not limited to plan review and inspection fees pursuant to Title 27 A of the King County Code and corrective work or abatement. 13. The APPLICANT hereby grants the COUNTY the right to enter and inspect the project site ru1d, in the event of any failure to comply with terms of this AGREEMENT, to implement such corrective measures as the COUNTY deems necessary. 14. The APPLICANT shall be responsible for the proper performance, safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the project. This responsibility shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the County's approval of plans, specifications, or work, or by the presence at the work site of the County's rcpresentativc(s), or by the compliance by the APPLICANT with any requests made by said representative(s). 15. TI1e APPLICANT shall indemnify and hold the COUNTY and it's agents, employees and/or officers harmless from ru1d shall process and defend at it's own expense all claims, damages, suits at law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against the COUNTY arising out of, in connection with, or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the Applicant's performance or failure to perfonn any aspect of the AGREEMENT. Provided, however., that if such claims arc caused by or result from concurrent negligence of the APPLICANT and the COUNn', it's agents, employees and/or officers, this provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the APPLICANT, and provided funher, that nothing herein shall require the APPLICANT to hold harmless or defend the COUNTY from any claim arising from the sole negligence of the County's agents, employees and/or officers. 16. In the event that any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction situated in King County, Washington. RELEASE REQUIREMENTS: This AGREEMENT shall remain in effect and the associated financial guarantee shall not he released until all terms of this AGREEMENT have been completed to the satisfaction of the COUNTY. ies hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. PN61 By Title Date :::s,;,_ p '"'-\ ~',._9 Date Received for the COUNTY by "''""~'"'""' """ ]Ml) A07BN411 • .~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Finnncial Guarantee Activity No. A07BN41 l Bond No. ------------- Name of Project Rathinam Short Plat Location/Address of Project Parccl6198400180 Bond Project No. L04S0003 Amount ---------------------- 0\4Z2A9 $14,769 We Omter lbn?s In:.. , as Principal and Int;erm.t-iqru E:irelicy Ioon::arce O:rq:aay a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of ~ Jere;zy: and legally doing business in the State of Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto King County, State of Washington, as Obligee, in the penal sum of Fourteen Thousand, seven hundred sixty nine 0/100 dollars for the payment of which we firmly bind ourselves, and our legal representatives, successors and assigns,jointly and severally. THE CONDITION OF OBLIGATION is that: I. The Principal has executed an "Agreement" entitled "Agreement to Install and Maintain Landscaping in Compliance with an Approved Significant Tree Retention Plan for a Subdivision, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Under the provisions oflhe Agreement, the Principal is required to furnish a guarantee to secure the Principal's compliance with the terms of the Agreement. 3. This Surety Bond is intended to secure the Principals' performance of work and payment of fees in accordance with the associutcd Agreement. IT IS FURTHER EXPRESSLY PROVIDED that: I. Until written release of this obligation by King County, this bond may not be terminated or cancelled by the Principal or Surety for any reason. 2. The obligation of the Surety shall not be discharged or affected by any extension of time for the Principal's performance of this Agreement or by any amendment of the engineering plans used for construction of the project. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such extension or amendment. The obligation of the Surety shall, in no event, exceed the penal sum hereof unless the Surety has expressly consented to any change, modification or extension of the Agreement and has issued its written adjustment of the penal sum, signed by the Principal and Surety. 3. Upon failure of the Principal to perform any of the tem1s of the Agreement, The Surety shall either perfonn the tem1s of the Agreement or shall tender to the County the amount which the County estimates necessary to effect compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The County estimate may not be challenged or otherwise disputed by the Principal or Surety. Any funds provided by the Surety in excess of that expended to remedy noncompliance with the Agreement will be returned to the Surety upon completion of the remedial work and payment of outstanding fees. 4. In the event that this project becomes part of an incorporated area, King County may transfer its rights and obligations under this Surety Bond and the associated Agreement to any successor jurisdiction without notice to the Surety or Principal. The rights and obligations under this Surety Bond arc for the exclusive benefit of King County. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the rights and obligations of King County under this Surety Bond may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred for any purpose. It is the APPLICANT'S/PRINCIPAL'S responsibility to notify King County of any change in address, phone number, or change of ownership of property. It is the APPLICANT'S responsibility to arrange for replacement of any/all financial guarantees prior to a change of on·nership occurs. Page I of2 Page 2 of2 PRINCIPAL: SURETY: ~:c? Sig"'"" e ,-.e,,; .LI-Date 12/5/07 Title Title Mailing Address Mailing Address 8Jl l.him Street, Suite Slffi ID Pax 370 Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle, WA 98lll-D370 2[6-322~393 2C6-li4 l --63JJ !'hone Nun1ber Phone Numhtr PLEASE ATTACH A POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SURETY AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE PRINCIPAL State of Washington, County of King I certify that I know or have seen satisfactory evidence that Ma...-IL Lu.~-<-.,,- signed this instrument and acknowledges it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: _____ I '.2-~_o_s~_o_-i ____________ _ Signature of Notary Public: ~~~~..,W=,-c..--· _?1' __ 7(,~t;s=------ Titlc: ___ /\l_,_b_v_~-3-+--'/'_"'-_· M,; __ ._c..---_________ _ My appointment expires: __ l_o~/-7_"'_~/ _o_"b _______ _ Financial Guarantee Activity Number: ___ _ SURETY.doc (10/99) .·~. _, __ . '"'... _ .i,, .l;:'.r ___ .)-;: ·-'r: ___ .\ ,., , . , .,,,.~...., _ .. . .,_, !·' KNOW ALL MEN BY TIIESE PRESENTS:,. 't~at-JNTERNA'.('IONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE .COMPANY;· a corp_oratio'ii oi'glinized~nd:l:1.isring,- ,laws 'of die State of New Jerseyi and having.it~:principal office in.· the.City, of,N:tiWark, New Jersey ,·does her'eb)' cOnstirut!: iind appoint · "; · · .. , ·'- ... 1.!...... ' ., .. , ' , ~ .. ":,. · 1 ,r;i~RYA poB~S,. ,flEATHER:A~LEN/STEVEN;;; )1LMER!;I~r;; t;k~;tr ~ot£{ ~ ULFERS, -J"; ROXf>NA PALACIOS ' ? ~i~~~d~~~~~{;;~it~~~~i~Jii~~~j;ffefl:t~~b~:i~!~t'iii·:·nij~J~~fifi~iiifi~~~~J';;l~~i .. ~i~·;:~;£~~~iif J~if 'iii~ii~~/J~frif~f :~~ the 'e1.ee1nion of such insttumem(s)· in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding' upon ilie said INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURAN(:E COMPANY.-as fully and amply, lo _all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly e,.ecuted and ack11owJedged-by its regularly elected officers at its principal office.. · · This Power of Attorney is e1.ecuted, ~nd may be revoked, p~rsull~t to and bY ·authOrity of A'rticl~'J-Sectioi, 3; of th~··ey-Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of INTERNATlONAL FEDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting called and held on the ,7th day of February, 1974. The President or any· Vice" PrCsident, faecu~i~e Vice President; ~ec~ta~--~r Assi:tam\ecreta!'Y, s·~-~H ~a~e p~wer-:and authority (1) To appi;i~t Anomeys·in-fact, and 10 :iuthori?e them to e1.ecute on behalf of the Company, a~ attich the Seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undenakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obhgatory in the nature thereof and, (2) To remove, at any time, any such attOmey-in-fact and revoke the authority given. Further, this Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile pursuant to resolution of [hi., Board of Directors of said Company adopted at a meeting du]y.called and held on the 29th day of April, 1982 of which the following is a true excerpt: Now therefore the signarures of such officers and the seal of the Company_ ma:y be affixed to any such rower of attorney or an)' cenificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such power of attorney or cenilicatc bearing such facsimile s1gru11ures or facsimile sea shall be valid and bindmg upon the Company and any such power so e1.ecuted and cenified by facsimile sig11atures and facsimile seal shall be valid and bind_ing upon the Company in 1he future with respect to any bond or undertaking 10 which it is attached. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, INTERNATIONAL FIDEUTI' lNSURANCE COMPANY has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officer, this 29th day of August, A.D. 2003. STATE or NEW JERSEY County of Esse;,. On this 29th day of August 20()3, before me came the individual who executed the 11recedin~ iMtrumenl, to me 'personally known, and, being by me duly sworn, said the he 15 the therein described arid authorized officer of the INTERN AT ONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affi1.ed to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affi1.ed by order of the Board of Directors of saul Company. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereu11to sec my hlrid 3.ffued TJly Official ·seal.- at 'the Cir:y of Newa_rk. NeW Jersey the day _and }'ear first :ibovci WriQen. . .. . . '· ···.·/· ...... -· ·. ~ ~.····· •• ~.-'···~ : •. -. L-', . __ ·(~.,· .-~--~-" :,,~ \ .; c·, }NdfARY. P,~~~1e:6~_NEW JERSEY ,' , , , ,· .:. CERTIFICATION_ ,>--:. ?·1Y,,~o~issi';)n~1,'.pire~Nov.21,2.01Q : .. ,, },:th~ u~de~ign_ed ~ofnc~_r Of.fNTE~ATioNAL: 'rmELITY INS~RANCE.coMPA~Y'.~o he;eby ·cerliry':lhat l have compa_red the f~ri,gmng Cop/of the Power of Attorney a!ld atlidavit, and the' cop}'.0f th(} Section of thC By'.LaWs of said c01lip~~fas_sf:t rofth in. sa 0 id:Po'wer of Attorney, With the ORIGINALS ON:' IN THE HOME_ ()Ff!CE' OF SAID CO~PANY, :an(f that the same .a.re cOrrect transcfiffets. tltereof," and ·of t11~ .wholi: of.thC said origina_ls .. and that tJui .Said Power j'O_r ~:~~ey has 'n~t -~n revoked:·~nd, is now-~::_1-'. force a~; __ :r_re_Ci'.i( ~~ \ ·':,,. .~' , __ .. ,:~, :_ };:t, · '2~~<;, zcorf -~:·:: :' / · .. INT~pMON\fH~REOF,_ I,h,3-,re ,~-~\~l!nto s~t,_:,°Y_~~nd $is. ":;·C?;··:t,-~ay ot;.~/'~~~~J\:. .:._, ', .-,tf;; ; --\ :; i ,., ... ,.,• '.M~;.¥/i!.~~· rl'ff~IZ.:' ·~ , , . {, t , -!_' Ass~tlnt Sec~tary '.;:-> 1 : , ~ , , ?. -'!h.' \}:5'!/1? \:;~:J~1!~{? '~ ~ Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Laureen M. Nicolay Thursday, September 10, 2009 11 :06 AM Jennifer T. Henning; Kayren K. Kittrick Chip_\lincent.,. (LUA09-022 Rathlam-short"Plaflssue?-Who will follow up on street trees, final lift, etc.? Just logging this in with the intention of sending to the Clerk's Office for archiving, but this project does not seem to be finished despite it being recorded in 2007: 9-LOT PLAT WITH 2 TRACTS. THIS PROJECT WAS PROCESSED ENTIRELY BY KING COUNTY AND THEN RECORDED IN 2007 BY KING COUNTY. IN EARLY 2009 FILE WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY FOR ARCHIVING. HOMES HAVE NOW BEEN CONSTRUCTED ON THE LOTS. HOWEVER, NEW HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN COMPLAINING THAT THE FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT HAS NOT BEEN INSTALLED AND THE STORM POND IS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. LAST NOTE FOUND IN COUNTY PLAT FILE IS THAT A REQUIRED FENCE AND STREET TREES NOT INSTALLED. Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax lnicolay@rentonwa.gov I ·=:> APPROVALS: RECORDING NO. I VOL./PAGE 8 SH .. OR:r., .f.!,.A. T NO. L04S0003 DEPARTMENT OF D£VEL0F>M0H ANO EN\IIRONMPITAL SERVICES DEP,tJ!TM[NT Of ASSESSMENTS ;;2.. 3 b ,, 1$'1NG COl;t}nY. WASHINGTON ~ .o.PPF!0\11::0 nn J,,_ D ... Y OF"__Q_cu.__ :olf1 [XAIIUQD »Ill .t.PPl!O',£ll lHIS J,d.. OAY ()1'"~20.QJ..... .. • .. J.(J"f .. ,·· / ' ' ~~. -~,-~~ ~t~;:'9?. SCALE pyj.• ] ,: ~, • '° ), .·.· .. f»"":EO Ml(> APPRO\UI THIS JtitkDAY OF"~2°'4-"Zff1l:A1:_~ ~( <' ---1------------'-""e_:_:::..,::.._ ________ ~ .·.· _,:··OE?.\CATION • \ \r:t•L--l.,i~,C•~,...); DCPVTY ~ING COJNTY ;;::::,,., PORTION OF ~ir~s'i~:~~~~~i"'~~-~-,.~~.,,..WsSJ -.f""OJ:f>ut:1ti (HW;[ER Accou,., NUMB€R SW 1/4 CS THE SW 1/4 • SEC 33. TWH. 23 N,RG 5 E. W.M .5fiORT F'I.AT TO 1W TI-<E: Gll'.(pH,C REPRESENTATION Of ~~c•n 5UBDl'/ISION,~~r.FNf)----------::-------:====::;::;:::::;::===:::--------''--..;..----;;;..,;;;:-:;-;;;:;;:<'s~--------------j ~~'Z~~~o~~s~~t-~~P~~ .. ~~t~~/:: LEGEND + LINE TABlf SURVEY NOTES OICA!t n.(·.VSE TM[lltOf r()II AU..'PIHIUC PUb>osl:s NOT ""CQN!lSlDH M'IH ~ S(T MON IN CASE SECTION CORNER LINE LENGTH BEARING CURVE TA8L£ tlNSTRUMENT: TOPCON OPT 3000W TOTAL STATION ~~~~~OPiw=~h~ ~~ t>:ts-~:,:.<,-· "~:.EX PK NA.IL L1 20.01 N01"20.ffE CURVE LENGTH RAOIU~ DELTA ~METliOO USED: ~~ !!t,~R~:~ ~~~GI.LS "fi<EREON-. Tl-IE .aoo~ 11(~!.0N.o.au: GRfl)iNC CT SAi!> S~t.s· AND AYE-(B ··f.x MON IN CASE , ... ,.~ QUARTUI CORNER L2 20.01 S01"22'52"W C1 }8.55 25.00 88"'20·31· WAC 332-130-090 >IUES. ANO r~~R orou::~ft TO THE \J'Z·o, ll<t f'l/8l.lC tu E.O.SOOENT5 O E;; •• EBAR f ,,,,,.•' ··,. L3 2001 N01"20.23"E C2 39.99 25.001 91·39·2s·10ATE OF SURVEY· APRIL 2007 ANO TRACTS onO""I ON Tljr., SMORT PLAr roo All o\iBL1C,1'Ull?OSE;S AS • • . "'. • ·' i·i C<LC\/LA~ , ' INOIC,,lEO ll<bjcON INCl\X)ING 8(Jl 'IOT. UMITEO JJ,l"PARK~." ~ SPA~s:· ·..... AS ·N01£D ,;., .. , ,;· >t ...... L4 30.01 so1·~~·s2·w BASIS OF &ARING: SE 192nd STREET CENTERLINE ~~~~11;:.~~f ~~\A=~~~~=~ ::-o sd 1/2~·'k£BAR .::>'"".:" ~) p~; ..... ,~.... ~:~o~!16~P~Jsi~ ~g~~TtRN l ?ERSON OR EHntY OlHER 111-'t,l:.1}<[ PUBUC.:·IN W<GI CASC "":i:>o HER{-~:CA~,:)38992 ·····.,,. (5PD9•' 5 PRtVAlt'~AINAGE EASEMENT RECORDS OF KING COUNTY w.A_ 8Y DUICATE SUCH STREET'S, EA!E,lp!TS. OR'.fRACTS.'lb TH(~ OR •• ·.,.. .<' •. .,' .-;> ;;·. , • , ECOROEO •-u E ' i EHnTY 10o1mro AND rOR THI: P<JRF'CJ8t.~A1t0 ·· ·· .,.;· .<'. -~; .. ,,,,· ,'/ ,· ···.,,,. N 89"3'4-3il w 1J18.05'. (P) A R IN ...... M 4, AGE 74. Dl~~~YE~~~~~~~":+~:Dll~i)-t>lfs~1~!~:~'~~ ,· ~:· y:-'·,,,/'._(··: -----;;:.•·:.:_.:..:' ./~ -,.,L_N_89'34'05" W..!_31~ _____ ---_ --1\ r .... ~~~v=~G~~~~.~=~~·~"..~~:t .. ,,,·· ./ / '·\.·r· ~~N~~ON"O~:tst 188th STREET FOUNOCONCMON 1 BC OCCAS>OP€O ev Tl-IE EST.t.EIUS>il,IENT CO<IS"IRUCTJON OR .. .c.;..iJfJoj~J.ll'' • :; ••• / : :· ,_.,," x.,, · •• • W/8AR 1 o·w O s·s Ri;)At)S ~/M ()R-.,.a: Sl"STrMS NfilN rHsS SHOl!T 0Sl.8lMSIOM OTHO! I r~ .. o PIPE lN _/ (_§..{9:1J' / ··=,_... .£$Si£ CU:N. · ' · ~ \-™"" Cl.ARIS R(SUI.T!NG nu:: .. IN.OOCOUATC IIA.JNTO<t.NC( BY KIN<; COUNl't. i;:.oNCRETE IN .: .,' ., .,' ,•.' VOL 241 ;r.s 8-12 (4 /07) ~~~~?tORUW:~~~.~~:S:,:E,_!j:~s="roSM.;"oiM~-f:cASE (4/o 7). J:·· .:/ I . ! • I· •/to\/·"=· .. I / I - .o.NO HCW KINC COUNl't, IT'S SUCCCSSDRS ,...D ASSl(lNS. f!AA11L.£SS moM ,11,1v , L();t ;:;J I . 'LOT J4 ,S89':» ,OJ,;.;,,W 33 ,34, I }~>1.0'r·. ·l?;_. LOT J8 , LOT 39 , LO 4 0 OAll..c.£. INO.UDING <NY COSTS OF ~S£. a..-ro BY POISCINS l!IITHN OR ' .:· :°· ,,, S89 50 5L ·W. 33 .19 _.$'1 NIHOUT ll1r$ 91()ilT SUOCN$10N ro HA',£ BE:OI CAUSW e, AI.T[l'ATIONS CT --• ·•• •. -- THE GROtN:> ~ACE. 111:GCTA"°"-DRArHAOC OR SURFACE OR SUO-SUFIFAC( r,t. f[MC[ 0.2.'. •• :: ,.:f48.78 •.. , 1 · ··.: 1"'-j"t-1 ···:,, _:.. 148.40 ,'I FOUND PIN IN :c~n~ .. =~~~=~r:!~sE~~=:l-:~•;:\ ,..:; FOUf,t~·l/{-'R(BA.R ·.·.,-' ·t. ,,.. ~.21' t.~.~sr~oc~ ,,.. IN CA~ONC:~ PIIOWltO THIS W ... V[R ,11,10 IND(l,INIFlC,,TION SHALL NOT Bt C0NS1l1U[(> AS IIOUNOR'r ~ &(;I.P LSfl8913 .:·LOT 5 .,,.)~ .... ,.-9 ~. LOT 6 ,.., ( / ) Rtl<A5'NGKINCCOUNl't,ITSSIJCCESSORSORASSIGNS,FRC't,OU"81Ul'tf0R • .n Q";1'W&09'S ,'f440sqft ,·ii •. :' 10 _.'" 7420 ft ~..a:~1:~TH~=~~N~~~N~S:SINPAAl I · .,{,l/07 ) ' / .t-' ./.. ·,'.,:.sq.· THIS SU80l"190N. (lfDIC.,.TI()IN, --CT a.A1"5·Q1£1.,fel!ED10H TO NS9-so"5:Z:E. ,. . ,'I N89"5052"E''=, ... ~~~~~-glllllfl.lT11£fflEE~.o.NOl'i·"+:!',~AHC£"'11< 148.82 , I· 'ltl -.,,,,:,,. ,•·1'~8'.41'.1. ;.' ·:: ... , ~ Pl)f;{"fu> ·I,--I ~· l'O£ (TTP) ,,,, -•. , 'IIE OU~ )l,1,NOS,,&iio SU.LS. 1 ~ LO't•;o,.,. .,• · ~i 1TB" ............. ,.,,tdt>· ••• ;) ' .• ,,,_ w(/) ii:'s-I!! __ ;;:;;:: ~ 7.442 sq.ft. _.:QI I ·rw i··f5ii .. 1.~20 J.ft. ~ ~ --1 u. a,o .,., "'' ., . A WASHI..C~'CORPOIUnON_.:· =.: .,,.,. i" C..::: N89"50'52"E: ,·.. J ·. I Ne9'50'52"E -:~· ~'"-'-\ '-...J .,·.'·1mr·C:f?f::'-\t..&IP !} W~~ ~:;° io-1, '" ~. .. :. IL~;;..,;_;,ilt<Tn>~An ........ R ... ~,A~OP.>lnn!n.:.NI==::-• >.,..s, !,i • N_ ·1 t'~lU UIIUIY~ I I ·I ~111·=· .. . . ... " _ :i;: $ LOT3 R£Cf20D61121000~0\1::: :.r,1 1~ LOf8 STATECTW,.g..,.CTON.}. .:·· .,•·J::o,"['.·. Q ($ NC' COUNNOFKIIIG '}" .,.;./ .• .:··' ,. --~a ····!Qt.: lif.._ Nv-,.,_..,,-...,,.. .,.:· (0£1.t" v,·. NH9~1J~T~ '•l'!..lr--1,1' 1'10\/J\J~Lt' ON 11<1s----OAY or 2007, Btf'ORE i,IE:· THE ~·-...... t..,-0 UNOERSIGtlEO. A NOTARY~'£. IN .o.ND fDR THE si .. rr or.-WASHIN~i"ON .-·~ O 0 ·: ff~ ~~1~-tE"'1([) ;; Tli("~,;:~Otl r;..~tf:ti.:TCD•TO-r;,,~ S' "'~·'I Cle.ft ~~ ~~1..c~~°'=~'SJ.~~~~:~ ~s; ·' l J?, -~~ llONEtl. ,.,..C, ON DAila STATED ll1AT·~ . , ,• , ,s AO , THE. SA10 1NSTI!U11ENT c:t1 BOW.F or·.~m ' " .,' --., . 1 , COFIJ>rt-,,.....~...,\ . ··\,. ..·' ' .,,• N89.M52'.'t NS9"50'52"E j,TINfs:tltli,T~ ;c() lJF'flOAL SUI. ltEfl(TO AFTIICED 1HE OAT AND,,,, •• ,:'j-48.92 148.40 1HE n""'IN'~& ~~t "80,I[ 'IIF!lntN. ,,.,,.. I ;,. N '"'" O>C_I!~ 3 ·-~ "' 't:t.1·g·.:. :1~ •• ,·2oin ... ,··:;::;i -'~ re~ ~ ww }i~ NQ b<O r<r M,--~ 00 ~ zz =:?/ "' w 1--u,,. ::f 0.. ,(,.,, (/) .......... f!: J,.. ~ (j '° 0 ~· w . ~ ,,.,&,.,,· > 1;;,s .J~ ..:/:: f:£ .c 1::8 k'• _. ;,,;., .,, 0 r r ~_g NI Q Q • ISSJ • ·~\PUBLIC/.itl . ··~a,>;; ·-I , g TRACTB "'~'}~~,,,.-' 5: ~~it iN AN~t STAT[ ····1 g (DRAINAGE FACILITIES) §is -1 z z ~ S 1/4 COR. stC 33-23-5 ·.,, ... ~ ..... ,,,•' or WASHINGTON. RE5'DING >,1 ~ .. t,>,t, .' • =· ..... /1 11,193 sq.ft STATE OF ,rA!HNCTON) &21' i&ed° ·t······· ... • I .•• COI.INTY CIF .-;M; l I •• °" n;,s~o~, CT ;V,.,...,..9,,.. 200,. svDRE 11E ,,..~ I .. .. .: .. , .......... c2-,..._ ---f..~··.:..::..:....m:sl -- UNO!:RSIQ4£0, A NOTARY i;i;aw9 l~NO F~ TllE ST,>.TE or WA$HINCTOH •• • .:· · l'{~}PPl'{1-A£0 <i\1E ~'wnON '~~E~g,_,~on'!f .,. E .,..=· R/W.OED1CA~ ,.-•, ··:. ,...,..,; fORE:OCJNG INS'!!MLNJ, ~ ACl<IKMLEOGCO SAIC INSTRUO,!OH TO BC lH£ •• ••.. 1 • :: .:· \ ''1 1' :: '.:oE~...J:~N~~c~~~:oo;~~~a.1"~~uscs 1 ---.N. a9·40~i:.4•[ ,i,;.04"' (C) .3.30'51 (1'").. ' · .. ~ le .)():,W54"W THIS PORTION IS OEOICA1£D {KCf5808) FOUND 1.EAD d< TO THE PUBLIC USE FOR TACK IN CONCRETE MON ROAD PURPOSES UPON THE /[IN CASE {'-/07) RECORO!NG OF THIS SHORT N•159,651.884 '""· I E-1.308..148.}46 FOUND CONCR£TE MOH {N...08J/il) ,------I W/ REBAR NO CASE DESlR0"\'£0 OUR!NG CONSTRUCTION (9/06) I "'~ri~is.~ "'-,.. J30 . .S"(9 n ~ _ Na9•40'5!'.'~~-+· -.:·---:-··--.:· .:''b26.~'~)---.-=.'--.:~~I ~~~ TO El(l'CU~.:E SA10 11'<Smu11ENT ON BE>1AlF or SAID ~ ~ / ~ ·"': •••. ,:.,-.'~ • ii·. :./· · .·:·';:· _._;.="-" ... ,==··' , ..• :. ·"-:.::.. ·· .. 1HE '1: !£l"fP.mlq!! v ~ SN CORNER S£C 3.3-23-5 (KC#,5809~ N89'40'54 '\31(.83 (M).,'1J22.30.:fP) .;· f···:... .,. .~: ,:'-" .,r ., ... <\ -·. ,,,ATEOfWASHltlGT FOUND L£AO &: TACK IN (BASIS OF BEAR\!IC)=(P) .:· :: ( ·:,,,. ••·• :· :. ,,•· COMMSS!ONQPrR CONCRETE MON IN CASE (4/07) S89'J3'09""E 2643.06 (KC) ···sw.coo--'·i.o s::1/4 ;, ···· ... !'.tlJN~:l'IRASS D\SK -'UGUST 21, 2008 WASNINCTtJN N=l59,872.5J {NAD f!J/91) SE 192 d STRE·E· r· .. .. ,. . IY/P(JN~· !N CON~~~-· . E-1.305,505.JJ (NAD 83/91) n ··,··:.. .:IN CAstpjo'7). ,... · 1 1m~1~m~1~~1~1ra~~ll, !~ ;j~f ~r~1190.~10, .··· ,.. Uf.f'=-'n~1 .:."' MANAGER ~.6~.J.. SUPT. OF RE<!ORO~t1", LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1'"'1S Sl-tOf!T PLAT COARtCTLY REJ>REstNTS A SURVEY MAOE 8Y ME OR UNOER MY OIRECT SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE """'"m mn j'"'" swum '" OROINANC[S APRIL 2007 ,_., ..... 'v- CERTIFICA TE NO ..... ~f/.n. ',iii:' TOUMA ENGINEERS /S.r, LAND SURVEYORS U.lZ S()(Jrli 191ST l'I.Aa"; SU1C c-,ru • KENr, 1M ,«lJ2 PHOI€ ('2:i) 251-~AX (425) 251-0Q5 CHKO. BY ""' _·: •:,,,. ·-,.,1 SHORT"PLAV' _,,:/.··-·-,_.,,.' .. /,.'·:·.,· !)ATE .:· ~iL 2007 JOB NO,<'• ¢."0-001-061 SCALE SHEET·.;·,.:,.· ,--•o· I or 2 ~ .. , s= .. - -en }: ~ SHORf·Pl:Al. NO. L04S0003 ~ Kl~f COU~:r(, WASHINGTON ""'"' :.' :":" ,1 LEG~~··DESCR\ftYo~/ • )·.. . :,,~if~e:9'4r-~KeJ;'~~PW:\1.!:R~ i:g~oo~r$.~~~~-4, ACCORDING TO TH[ PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN EASE.M~N{PROVISIONS;····"··· . --·--"··· '"··,;,;..;-U,S£MENT 1$·.~EBY R;cim-.ro rOJ1:·:-~No GRJ·Tm.ro'~·uGET SOUNo ENERGV::is;oos CREEK wAW<' ....... ,., ••.. , ANO SEWER OISffilCT, OWEST TD.£PHQtlt COMP~Y. C,'SLE TB..EVlSlcy-1 • .,4.~0 '11-lOR R_(SPECTI~ SU!<(lESSORS ANO .'. RECORDING NO. SCALE: PORTION or GENERAL NOTES SW 1/4 c:,; THE SW 1/4 TRACT A IS OEOICAlED ANO CONVEYED TO fl.-lE STRATION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR PAR!< PURPOSES UPON THE RECORDING OF" THIS 9l0RT SU80IVISION. lHE HOI.IEOIINER'S ASSOC1AT10H 9lAl.L BE RESPCf-lSISl£ FOR TtlE MAINTENANCE Of SAIO TRACT ANO THE IMPROVEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN. TRACT 8 IS DEDICA TEO ANO CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR STORM ORAiNAGE PURPOSE:S !JP()rl THE RECORDING or THIS SHORT SUB01VISION. VOL/PAGE ;2_3e, I 2 ,o SEC 33, T\IN. 23 N,RG 5 E. W.M ASSIGNS, UN~.ANO U~ lHE EnrRICl'l 10.f!IT,.l'"ARAUU yt,.nl AN[1·.;t,DK)INING:THE Slf!tf·?,;· .,-!" :~TAg= 1:fsrfil.·"6.~-:~s:ti~ ~~~/J2H~s~A:Ou~~~t~j~. .,, ...... .,, •• ,,··· .. ._ .. "',,»£ ~ ~Clfl~ ~.-.i:t~-~FJ,/t1\.,,~ ~~~~ ~8.l0or™~=T MAINS. CAl3t.ES ANO \IIIRES WITl'!.'f.EC£S$,IJl:Y FACILITIES AN~.:OTHER EQUIPMENT FQf( THE'.-~RPOSE OF \~· . . ' ,Wo ~\-IRONI.IENTAL SER'<1CES {0.0.E.S.). ANY OEYIATI()N FROI.I lliE APPROI/EO Pl.ANS \IIILL REQUIRE ~~N~o ~s~i~~~ A~gJ~/~gtl~ u~rs;f.s:-~\~~~E~.:~~TEO. ntESE.t~;.;.{ ., ... ,, ... /·~~-M'~~OVAL FROM TtlE PRoPEA AGENCY, CURREN Tl y o.O.E.S. OITER!Il UPON FOR TI-lESE PURPOSl:S SHAU. OC R!jTOREO AS NEAR AS POSSlllLE T03liElR ORIGI~·.,,;: ,,> .,:· .. ;· CONDITION BY TliE UTIUTY. NO LINES OR WIRES FOO:~£ TR"""5WISSlc»,I Cf.·-tl.ECTRIC OJRROH, .>· '.~.. lHE'Slf![V" TREES PURSUANT TO KCC.21.A.16.050 SHAU. B£ O~ED ANO l,OJNTA!NED BY fl.-lE TEl..(PHONE OR CABLE TV SHAU. Bf PU.CEO OR 8£ ~mm TO BE p.t.'ACED UP~: ANY LOT .lSfllESS ·:t· .:SJRAfroN HOI.IE~ERS J.SS()CIATION UNLESS ANO UNlll. KiNG COONTY OR ITS SUCCESSOR Tli( S.•,J.tE SHALL BE UND(RCROUNO OR IN CONOUIT ATIA ~-lO~"tl!JllDING .• /· .,_..,,· :•. .• A°dE')' HAS AOOPlED A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. s•io EASEMENT M•Y CONTAIN PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AS SHOWN.00 Tl-IE APP.FiOVED CONsmUcnoN .,,· TR~TS A ANO B A.RE CONSIDERED "TRACTS" PUR~~T TO KCC 19A.04.JJO; A "TRACT" IS LANO ORA'MNGS ON nLE Wlti KING COUNTY 0.0.E.S. ANO AS GENERALLY SHOv.N oti..~EET 1.~ l or n-i1s:: f RtSERVED tOR·sPECIR~.US(S INO..UOINC. BUT ttO"filw.l~D TO, RESERVE lRACTS, RECREATION, OPEN SHORT PLA.T. lHE MAINTENANC( OF lHOSE PRIVATE STORM ORAINAG£ sYSTEMS. •• •• , ::·· • .,· .,'SPACE..liEJISITI'.£ A.REAS,"SIJJif"ACE WATER R£1Wl10N. U.\ILJTY FACILITIES ANO ACC(SS. TRACTS ARE NOT 9lAU. 8£ THE RESPONSl81LITY or TtlOSE LOT OlW-IERS BENEFITING FROM SAD sYSTbts. • CONSl(}EREO LOTS OR BUILDING.SITES FOR PU~ 01" .. RESIOOmAl o~o CONSTRUCTION . .. .:= .. ,.. ~:-. .,,,, .. /.;· TREE RETENTION PLAN NOTE ·· ... 0 , •• •• ~~~~:: ii!~:~T: ~':~~c=/:~~ ~~: ~;'; ;\~G ~~TYPR~~~ OF.,·:·'· ENCINEERING Pl.Alfi NO. P4161. UNDER ACTMTY NO. L07l'R035. LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 WITHIN THIS 9lORT SUBOMSICH •• ,._,f' El"IHER CCf-lTAIN lREES THAT MUST BE RETAIN~'Ofl. MUST BE PLANTED / REPLACED PER SAID APPROVED TREE RUENTION PLAN. ANY PRoPOSE0 CLEARING, GRADING Q{f" CONStku<;I1Ct-1 ACT11/111ES THAT WILL OR t.lAY IMPACT A S1GNIF\CANT TREE WITI-llN SAID LOTS MUST Bf REVIEYIED ANQ..=APPRO\o£0 BY"iotJG COUNTY LAND USE SER\'ICE:S 01"1SION. OR ITS SUCCESSOR AGCNCY, FOR COt.lPUANC( \tilTI-l SAID TR~ RaENTION PLAN. ·.·,,. DOWN SPOUT NOTE _c.· ,.•· ··,.,. ·, ALL BUILDING DO\\N SPOOTS. FOOTIN(htlRAINS, ANO DRAINS F'ROM ALL IMPEJ11i!OUS SUIWACES SUCH AS PATIOS ANO OIIIVEWA\'S SHALL BE COtllNECTID TO THE PERW,.'ND.T STORM .GIi~ OU~ AS SHO\IIN ;ON T1iE APPROVED ~smucocr. ORA'IIINGS NO. P4161 ON nu: 111TH IONG COUNTY:1>EPAAiMOH pF•oc.nCPlilnlf ANO ENVll!QNl,IENTAL SDl\.1CES {ODES) NlO/r.. 1HE CU'AICTMENT ~~~AS~~ ~~~BE=~=RJ THE~~~ ~~AP':!1. ~CON=~% ~AT AR£ DESIGNATED FOR PEMQ'rATEO STU80Uts; OISPERSION.OR INOMDUAl.,•UH lNFt.TRATION sYSTOIS, TH( sYSTEI.IS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIM~-OF" THE BUILOIWC PERI.Ill .lNO:'SHAU. COMPL'I' NTH S~·l'U.WS. 'Al.l. .. ll;:IDl"10UAL STUB-OUTS ANO l~FlLTRATION SYSTEMS SH1Q..L BE PRIV•!t\-Y OWNED AN() "MAINTAINED .IJ'r' THE ~Gf OWNER • · MPS NOTE .,• .. ,,. ,...... .. ........ ,.·· ROAD li!PS FEES PER K.C. "(:IJGE 14.75 FOR LOTS 2 TljROlJct-Ui:" .• •. .. TlilS Pl.AT IS SUB.ECT TO KING°'£OJJNTY COO£ 14.79,'KING GOONTY ROAtfMITIGATION PAYMEN-1 SYSTEM (MPS).--r~ LOTS 1 TliROUGH B. fl.-![ l,IPS FEES PLUS n'ft-w>S·•AOt.flNISTRATI~;l;EE 9lAL~:'BE PAIO ,t,1 THE TIM~·or B_t,ill.OING PERMIT.···: ••.• APPUCATION AT THE RAlE IN EFFECT AT THAT Tit.IE. •. .,,· • .·" ' :rR~~~! ~r-.;,;.s~s~J 5_.kOR~ki WITH!N ·~ »fiEE YEARS PRIOR •• lO·. n~{APPUCA~,•;OR \_; ~_: OEVEL.OPl,IENT OF rn1s SU80l'AS10N. LOT 9 iN THIS PLAT SHALi:'~ EXEMPT mOM ,TI-iE PA,:nlENT OF FEES REOUIREb':QY KING COUNTY COO[ 14.75, MITIGATION PAYMENT SYSTELI. SEE KlNG COUfirT,<lf;t'J.,!llllDIT OF Tll;'-NSPORT~:flON PUBUC RULE•:,,;; 6.2.1.4. • • ROAD WPS ms PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOT 1. •• ··\., .••• ,'':. •;. • ~N~!o~EOUIRED BY KING COUNTY C00E 14.75, MITIGATION PAYlilENT SYSTEM WPS. FOR:.LoT 1 IN llilS SHORT"l'\AT HAVE ADDRESS NOTE .... , .... ,,,,,,",··· .~.COHSTRUCTION'"WOR);:·JNVOLVIN(l :son. OIS.lUR8ANCE; "CRAOING, ANO FILLING or 11,E SHE. INCLUDING ;."fflDIVlDUAL..J!'ESIOENTl.({,,~!UIIN.Q" PAO ~r«PA.R.&ti~, IS PROHIBITED FROM OCTOBER 1 TtlRDIJCli MARCH ;: JI. UNL(S'S OTliERIIISE ~~ BY.JUNG COU!'tf"'( DOES OR ITS SUCCESSOR AOCNCY-.. .. .. .,· ,· ·····"·•. ··\PARKiNCt~·E·sm1c11.0NS Nal'E: ·:(..... ., ..... ,,.. .., //_. ., .. ,)1 ;;tio:fWOONG IS /)U."CI~ "''j"ANf 1114;."·Al.ONG ONf;.SIQt,Q(i)7th P~t[ Sf.~ DESIGN>,$ BY TJ:lt'KlNG COUNTY FIRE MAR9lAL""S'O'Ff:i. 1HE P.\)IPOS[ Of·:'L'HIS R~CTION IS ·to· PRtMOl:: ADEOU~ ROAO •.• iltt>TH F(~:·lHE ACC[S5 OF EMERGENCY VEHla.ES. {.. • .• • --·····-· •• .:.·'· ./: •. ·"· SAio ROAD 'Mt.I. HAVE TO·ar,~ /~GNED ~:-A FlRE ~ AS ouruii:o 'H ufu 17 Of:'TI-1[ KING COUNTY CC()[, TH!S Will REQUIRE (I) Tl-IE PAINTING OF 'Inlow CtJRBS..Oft·A' 6-!NCH s~i>E oo'fl"ol Tl1E S10f"OI' THE ROAD ANO THE PAINTING or "NO PARKiNG FIRE LANE" IN .'IP.LOW ON ONE SOE OF TH(:"PAVEMEff'f OR (11),l'HE INSTAU.ATION OF "NO PARKING F1RE LANE° SIGNS (',ERY 50 FEET. ·:ro;\'IHG SIGl'(S,{IUCH C00TAIN.ffiE NAMf-~D PHONE NUMBER or THE TOWING COMPANY} MUST Al.SO BE POSTED. co1,UUJltS>:;1.t•,u. BE.Rt:CORO[O FOR TH!S.(PUT/SHORT PU.D THAT ADDRESS THE INSTALLATION ANO PRIVATE COOTINUED lJ,<JN.{ENANc;e: BY WE HOME i;tillt!ERS ASSOCIATICW'f. or TtlE FIRE LANE Al.ONG Wlltl ltiE APPURTENANT SIGNAGE. TI-lESE C0'"1Jil~'r.> SHA.1,1. HA\/[ IB£ Af>PROVAL OF TtlE KJNG COUNTY FlRE MAASHAL"S OFflCE. <.. . ... OOCUt.lE}ITATION VERIFYING THAT TME nRE LANE PAINTING AND SIGNAGE Hi-5·-efu 1NSTAI.LED, INSPECltO AND APPRO..a> BY TME KING COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE. SHAU. BE REOUIRED AT TME TIME OF" 8Ult..DING PERLIIT APPLICATION UNLESS A NATIONAL FIRE PROlECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) STANDARD 130 SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS TO BE INSTALLED. TlilS PARKING RESTRICTION MAY 8E DEEMED NUU ANO VOID, ONLY IF: ;:.-.}..l)U. RESIDENCES ALONG 117th Pl.AC( SE HAVE iNSTAU.EO A NATIONAi.. FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) ._.STANO,f,,ll:O 130 SPRINKI.ER SYSTEM OR AS IJAY BE APPROVED BY TliE KING COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL OR HIS/ HER OESIGf:I~ OR. BJ./~ ROAO_s:=~·-MQENEO TO A MINIMUM 28' PA'-'E:MENT WIOTtl, TO fl.-![ SATISFACTION or Tl-IE KING COUNlY FlRE ~ . .-.RSHAL ~ •. 111S / H~::0£SIGN_I;~. PR1vi\~ DR,.:;NAo{ EAsE'ttNi' toVENANT: TliE HOUSE ADDRESS SYSTEM fCOR llltS SHOOT SUSOIVISION SHALL 8( AS FCUOWS: AOOR£SSES 9lAI.I. BE ASSIGNED FOR THE NOR™ -SCJUlH ROADS wmnN TH[ RANGE OF 19103 TO 19146 At<> Wlll-llN TliE RANGE OF 11628 TO 11800 FOR Tl-IE EAST -'1111::ST ROADS. INOl'AOUAL · ... ,*:~YNERS . .;.· PRIVA:,i PRCFartf'wl'niN THIS SH~t.F'(Af"DilCUlilBERED 'MTH DRAINAGE E.t.SEMENTS 9l0v.N AS "PRlVAT[". HEREBY .,-<'ll'l:ANT AN~:C()NY['t:fO KING Col)NTY, A'f'OUTICAL SU80IVIS.0N OF.'!WE STAlE OF WASHiNGTON, lHE RIGHT, 8UT NOT THE OBUGATION · .. /to Cct,",f;f"OR slORE STORll":·ANo SURF"ACE WATER l:'f:R 1HE ENGINEf.RING PLANS APPROVED tCR TI-l!S SHCRT PLAT BY KING COUNTY, "; •• TOGEltiER Willi 'll-lE RIGHT ,OF' REASON~ ACCESS-~1N!;Rt:ss ANO EOftESS), TO ENTER s•m DRAINAGE EASEMENT FM THE PURPOSE AOORESSES WILL BE ASSICNEO TO THE PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF EACH RESIDENCE OR BUILOING IN ACCORDANCE Y,\TH KING COUNTY COOE 16,08 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION COVENANTS: TliE QY,t,!ERS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE ARE RESPONS1Bt£ FOR PROW>!NC THAT THE STRATION HOWE<»WERS ASSOCIATION CONTINUES TO BE A \'IABLE ANO FUNCTIONING LEGAL ENTITY. SAID HOMEOWN£RS ASSOCIATION SHALL OWN ANO t.lANTAIN ltiE TRACTS AND EASElilENTS AS INDICATED ANO CO\"£NANTED HERElN, UNLESS Ofl.-lERWISE APPROW BY KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF" 0£1/El.OPMENT AND ENVlRONMENTAL SERVICES OR IT SUCCESSOR AGENCY. TlilS COVENANT SHAI.L RUN WITH lHE LANO AND IS 81NOING UPON THE O'M<IERS OF AU. LOTS 1 lHROUGH 9 INO..USIVE, 11-l[IR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS. DEMOLISHED RESIDENCE IMPACT FEE NOTE FOR SCHOOL IMPACT FEES: PURSUANT TO KCC2tA.4J. 50-IOOL IMPACT FEES FOR LOTS 1 lliROUCH 8 SHALL BE ADORESSED AT THE TIME or BUILDINC PERMIT APPLICATION. • QI:",. OBSER\'IN!i"."THAT THE;:OWNERS >.Rt PROPERf,'f OPER~TING ANO t,t°AINTA!NINlo..n.&·~,'JNAGE FAOUTIES CONTAINED THEREIN. TH£ -~ERS"-~. SAl0 Ji~~ATE PR~~RTY AR/~EsPON~ FOR ~.-,TING.'~A!NTAININ~\~ . .R£PAIRING lHE DRAINAGE FAOLITIES CONTAINED ll!TH!N·.S,U) ORAJN....c;ec·EASOIDtl'. ANO .._ee; HEREBY-~CXJIRED TO OOT.f.lN ANY R!QI..Mt'.O P!RMITS fROU n£ KING COUNTY OEPARll.lENT"or DE'YEI,.Qf'i.-ENT ANO EN\'l~ENTAL SEl:t\'ltts PRIOR TQ,f'ltr:IIJlG, PIPING.:CUTTING·OR·REt.lO'MNG VEGETATION {EXCEPT FOR ROUTINE LANOSCAf>~ WAlf'lltNANCE ~CH AS y,iiw-.1,,i:rQ'MNG) IN CP!N..-~G£'.TATEO ~A.INAG£:f"Acitf11E$. (SUCH AS SWALES, CHANNU.S, OITCHts, PciNOS.. etc.). OR .PERF'ORMlt,tG Alff ALTERATIDk5-OR 1,1001FICAT1DNS TO mE ORAIN.l;G( Ff\Cll.JTl[S. CCf-lTAlNED WITHIN SAIO DRAINAGE EASEIAENT .• :: . .• . •. . . . • . •. •• ~gCE~r~~: 'Mfi.-1 THE LAND ... Nc(IS·alf'IOHG ~ lHE o~.-~)~O'PmVA~,PROPER~---~. HEIRS, ··. ··-· .. :· ;: ... ====s1 ====N .. ~ ONE RESl0CNT1Al UN1T WAS EXISTING PRIOR TO TliE CIE"'El.OPMENT or THlS SU8Cll\'ISION. Ir TliE ISSUAHCE OF A NEW _.,..:u:: · BUILDING PERMIT FOR LOT 9 OCCURS ON OR PRIOR: TO AUGUST 29, 2009, THEN SAlO LOT SHAU. BE EXOIPT FROM THE .... ~-~!i/' PAYMENT or Tl1E SOIOOL IMPACT FEES. IF THE ISSUANCE or A NEW BUllDING PERMIT FOR SAID LOT OCCURS AFTER ""ii::" TOUMA ENGINEERS 1$4< LAND SURVEYORS "·f{•'\THINAM .~HORT .. JnLAT • . ·: :.=· .. ,,,,,· ./· •:,. _s AUGUST 29, 2009, lHEN TI-IE FUU ASSESSED SCH()(). IMPACT FE[, TOGETHER WITH TI-I£ QJRRENT AOIJINISTRATION FEE. l/lJ.J2 sa.,m 1111ST PlJta; svm: C-102 •l(EJ,IT, WA 98llJ2 OWN. BY OAT_E!"· .• ====$ IJUST BE PAIO AT lHE TIME OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. SU K.C. COO[ 21A.43.070.A.2. PHOIE (4:/!i) l!II-0565 FAX (4:13) ZI-Cl62!i OAN T •"Al:'~.IL. '2007 ~&f=:;. Cl-i!<O. BY SCALE SHEET •• Ml-iT •• r:.;f 2 ,JC!B NO. .,:· •• 670-~07-061 · ... .,,~· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I 1/ l,;" fRIECtEOW'f{Q) MAY 2 0 2005 KING (;UUN7Y LAND USE SERVICES \ ai~lhl u 111lalD'1111 S hlor~ Pia~ 11634 S.E. 192nd Street King County, Washington King County Project No. L04S0003 ~~ Prepared for: Sharmila Rathinam 24006 S.E. 10th Street Sammamish, WA 98075 November 2004 Revised February 21, 2005 Our Job No. 11614 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 18215 72NDAVENUESOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES o OLYMPIA, WA o TEMECULA, CA o WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com I • ... ) I I I I I I I I r'. ) I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Figure l -Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet Figure 2 -Site Location Figure 3 -Soils 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Existing Site Hydrology B. Developed Site Hydrology C. Performance Standards D. Flow Control System E. Water Quality System 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 7.0 OTHER PERMITS 8.0 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT 10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 11614.004.doc I I ,., .· ) I I I I I I I · 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW I \J I I I I I I I l .. I I I I I I I I le) I I I I I I 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Rathinam Short Plat is approximately. 2.25 acres in size and located within a portion of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Renton, King County, Washington. More specifically, the site is located at 11634 192nd Street in Renton, · Washington. The proposed project will subdivide approximately 2.25 acres into nine single-family residential lots, a storm drainage tract, recreation tract, and a sub-access street. The proposed lots will be accessed directly from the sub-access street that is designed in accordance with the King County road standards. There is one existing single-family residence on the site with adjacent outbuildings. The remainder of the property contains grass, brush, and trees. No wetlands or sensitive areas exist on site. The site is bound on the west, north, and east by single-family residences and by S.E. 192nd Street to the south. The subject property· is relatively flat and. gently slopes from the west to southeast, with elevations ranging from approximately 510 feet along the western boundary of the site to 502 feet along the eastern site boundary. The overall topographic relief between the west and east site boundaries is 8 feet. The site contains Alderwood type soils. The project proposes to construct a combined detention/wet pond in the southeast portion of the site. The stormwater pond is designed pursuant to the 1998 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual (KCWSWDM) and provides Level 2 Flow Control and Basic. Water Quality Treatment. Stormwater from all future homes and proposed roadways will be collected in a series of catch basins and conveyed to the pond for treatment and detention, then discharge near the southeastern property line. Enclosed within this report are calculations that show how the proposed facilities will accommodate the requirements as outlined in the 1998 KCWSWDM. 11614.004.doc I I I) I I I I I I I FIGURE! TECHNICAL INFORMATION I C) REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET I I I I I I I ii ,) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner Charter Homes Address 2825 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98102 Phone Project Engineer Hal P. Grubb, P .E. Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Address/Phone 18215 -72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032/ (425) 251-6222 D Subdivision HPA 181 Short Subdivision D Grading , : ., t1;''.'j' , : , ) ') r , , •• i· .l ' , }) ',. · f>~rt 2! 'PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION · ·t·· . . . ,-' . . . -~ Project Name Rathinam Short Plat Location 11634 S.E. 192nd Street Township ...:2:::3::....::._N:..:oc:.rt:::h=-------------l Range ---'5=-=E=a=st=--------------l Sectio·n ...:3::.:3=---------------l -:'. . ·'!IT',!'' -·;: -~ ' . . ." . .-. : . • Part 4''' OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS ' :!., ) .. ,. "· t, '" . ' • :;-, '' . D DFWHPA D Shoreline Management D COE 404 D Rockery D DOE Dam Safety D Structural Vaults D Commercial ·, D Other ( ~ D D FEMA Floodplain D Other COE Wetlands L_-============:::J ) ' Community Soos Creek Drainage Basin Green/Duwamish River Basin Part6 s1T~ c~A11l'trE11i~tics':'.i:: ,,;;i /F · . ., :. \: ;,r,:;/,l/''/' ·. · !, :: · . : , · < ·, . ' " ,'' ': :•, i", ' . I {'. ,,, • ,, , .• ~' , , J, ' :-, ' ' ;, D River D Floodplain D Stream D Wetlands D Critical Stream Reach D Seeps/Springs D Depressions/Swales D High Groundwater Table D Lake D Groundwater Recharge D Steep Slopes D Other -1- .. • ... · .. ·. ,::: ... ·,,;. ,; . . . 11614.003.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Part 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Alderwood (AgB) I to 5 eercent D Additional Sheets Attached Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE D D D D D Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS (~) 181 DURING CONSTRUCTION 181 181 181 181 181 D Sedimentation Facilities Stabilized Construction Entrance Perimeter Runoff Control Clearing and Grading Restrictions Cover Practices Construction Sequence Other Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM D Grass Lined Channel D 181 Pipe System D Tank Vault . D Open Channel D Energy Dissipater D Dry Pond D Wetland 181 Wet Pond D Stream Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Minimal LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT 181 181 181 181 D D D D D D D MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION Stabilize Exposed Surface Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Limits of SAO and Open Space Preservation Areas Other------------------< Infiltration Method of Analysis Depression KCRTS Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Runoff will be tightlined to a combined detention/wet Dond. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation ) -2-11614.003.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I Part 11 " . '' '' ·~-'. ., . '" ' <' ~ ' '. ,: ,, ' STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Part"12 · EASEME!<lTSITFIACTS· J { ) ·~ ~-"' ' } . '. D Cast in Place Vault D Drainage Easement D Retaining Wall D Access Easement D Rockery> 4' High D Native Growth Protection Easement D Structural on Steep Slope D Tract D Other D Other ",' . ., .. Part 13 SIGNATUFIE;OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ' ·~ ' . . '!'.". \ 1~1-, •. , •!JI' !,,:·c·. " ,, ,~ -: .. ' ' :: . I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Sianed!Dated -3-11614.003.doc I I I I I I I I n I It) I I I I I I I I I FIGURE2 SITE LOCATION I I I I s I I I "l 96TII I I I I I I I I I I I VICINITY MAP I ST SE,18.fil!!....§.L ~ 188TH _T_ ~ i= ~ i= m> -< !§ ' :-' . "' . :J t;; ;;: a ' \ ST ~ 33 cl JR /IS 124 ;t w,; ;;: • i( g 'C<,t :,: SE j95iii ~ • ! <' ~[~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •PN BCli969 I !YQ"I· ,A KING, WA --·--· .......... , ... . ' Map ID: 23-05-JJSW -·-.. s --.. ~ -·· -~----...... ~ 17/,.{._j~l-r.,L,....-/J, ! / ~ / / / / / - V / // / / ;// / / / / ~,y;, / I/ &19120--0,«/ o,onJ<.,120 I '~!;:l : 11 ,1¥1 619110 / I ~,(. f-n , I// / / · / /// / "'")I· ~ j ~ I~ ' II!!" 0462 / l/~90 l,,.,,fu j r-,'----,l / ;/ r----/ / -/ ~ 1,,.,/ / / .,.,~,,. .... \ '""'' / ; ; , . / ;_':', !:;" DQ25 0020 --''""° ;; ' ~~ 01"10 .,.,,., ... --0~ '5! ~ ~ .. '!!!' -""' - 619960 619960 . 0020 0042 019780 619180 ~ -·· 0242 o.;:. \ -·· - IIJ>Oll<lfflj ''"- '"' -' 619~0 - / 6199'60 619960 0160 . 619960 OJ.!,~ -· ' ' 0180 , I -00001· ·~ - / / I m-M,O "ffl-12, .. -' ,,_ 0120 0127 ' "" =~~ ··-··-¥ ··-1-----------,f-----=------li: f-.~r-.--,..L..,-,L,,,....j / ,, ; >-----'-"-~-·~'-"----~· .J-' -----·-·--·,-_____ _,i,,! o=::::::,,.----/.~-....l,-a .. ,...-1 61~900 0240 01~2 O,M m,o __ , ~ "'="' m ,,·=1140 61~J20 •• ~ 1"',-.,"~i .:~ r ·~;~ 519900 / "~"' ma f · om :i :·· 0220 - / - 7 - i6191MO<l160; ....... ' 61B840 0180 -·· 619840 0360 -·· i J ,...Ji'. 9900 , L C 60 ' 1-· i 11 '"' ; ....... ' m<> I .L ,-:F· .,,., / / / I // iPVru ~/,, !/ v"""°""7 ,;;;,/_/,.,93200/ ,,, !: ••. / 0014 0016 ' ,, ... ,' , / / // '17· / ,' /, ,.r, : / /~ /, / 'I ./ ' ,.-/ ASSESSOR'S MAP / f I I r-) I I I I I I I Io I I I I I I I ) I I FIGURE3 SOILS MAP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOILS MAP I I I() I I I I I I I I CJ I I I I I I : I I \ I ' -) \ I ; 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY I I () I I I I I I I I ( ··, .) I I I I I I I I ! I 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2.1 Core and Special Reqnirements Summary CORE REQUIREMENT NO. I: DISCHARGE AT THE NATURAL WCATION Requirement: All surface and stonnwater runoff from a project must be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto or away from downstream properties. The manner in which runoff is discharged from the project site must not create a significant adverse impact to downhill properties or drainage systems. How this Project Complies: This project is proposing a combined detention/wet pond that will discharge flows near the southeast corner of the site; the natural discharge location of the existing site. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 2: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Requirement: All proposed projects must submit an off-site analysis report that assesses potential off-site drainage impacts associated with the development of the project site and proposes appropriate mitigation of those impacts. The initial pennit submittal shall include, at a minimum, a Level 1 Downstream Analysis as described in Section 1.2.2.1. How this Project Complies: This project is submitting an off-site analysis, which can · be found in Section 3.0 of this Technical Information Report. Please refer to that section for the off-site analysis. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 3: FWW CONTROL Requirement: All proposed projects, including redevelopment, projects must provide on- site flow control facilities to mitigate the impacts of increased stonn and surface water runoff generated by the addition of new impervious surface and any related land cover conversion. These facilities shall, at a minimum, meet the performance criteria for one of the area-specific flow control standards described in Section 1.2.3.1 and be implemented according to the applicable flow control implementation requirements in Section 1.2.3.2. How this Project Complies: This project is proposing drainage facilities that will detain all stormwater runoff using Level 2 Flow Control in accordance with the 1998 KCWSWDM methodology. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM Requirement: All engineered conveyance system elements for proposed projects must be analyzed, designed, and constructed to provide a minimum level of protection again overtopping, flooding, erosion, and structural failure as specified in the following groups of requirements: • "Conveyance Requirements for New Systems" Section 1.2.4.1 • "Conveyance Requirements for Existing Systems" Section 1.2.4.2 • "Conveyance System Implementation Requirements" Section l.2.4.3 11614.004.doc I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I -, ) ) How this Project Complies: This project has proposed conveyance system facilities in accordance with the sections noted above. All conveyance systems have been designed as required by the 1998 KCWSWDM. Pipe sizing calculations have been included in Section 5 of this Technical Information Report. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 5: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Requirement: All proposed projects that will clear, grade, or otherwise disturb the site must provide erosion and sediment controls to prevent, to the maximum extent possible, the transport of sediment from the project site to downstream drainage facilities, water resources, energies, and properties. To prevent sediment transport, erosion and sediment control measures are required and shall perform as described in Section 1.2.5.2. Both temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control shall be implement as described in Section 1.2.5.3. How this Project Complies: This project has proposed erosion and sediment control facilities in accordance with the typical Best Management Practices utilized by King County and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Sediment pond calculations have been provided as. part of this Technical Information Report and are contained in Section 8.0. In addition, an erosion and sedimentation control plan has been designed for · this project with supporting details necessary for the contractor to construct such improvements. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 6: MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Requirement: Maintenance and operation of all drainage facilities is the responsibility of the application or property owner, except those facilities for which King County (Maple Valley) is granted an easement, tract, or right-of-way and officially assumes maintenance and operation as described below. Drainage facilities must be maintained and operated in compliance with King County maintenance standards. How this Project Complies: This project proposes to construct a stormwater pond that will be dedicated to King County. This facility will be maintained by King County. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 7: FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND LIABILITY Requirement: All drainage facilities constructed or modified for projects ( except downspout infiltration and dispersion systems) must comply with the financial guarantee requirements in King County Ordinance 12020 and the liability requirements of King County Code 9.04. JOO. There are two types of financial guarantees for projects constructing or modifying drainage facilities: the drainage facilities restoration and site stabilization guarantee and the drainage defect and maintenance guarantee. How this Project Complies: This project will provide all financial guarantees and liability, in accordance with the 1998 KCWSWDM. CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 8: WATER QUALITY Requirement: All proposed projects, including redevelopment projects, must provide water quality facilities to treat the runoff from new and/or replaced pollution generating impervious surfaces and pollution generating pervious surfaces. These facilities shall be 11614.004.doc I I i) I I I I I I I I {_ ) I I I I I I I I I selected from one of the area-specific water quality menus described in Section 1.2.8.1 and implemented according to the applicable water quality implementation requirements · of Section 1.2:8.2. How this Project Complies: A wet pond is proposed for this project as a means of providing water quality treatment. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT NO. 1: OTHER ADOPTED AREA-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Requirement: This requirement mandates that all projects within critical drainage areas, master drainage plans, specific basin plans, lake management plans, or shared facility drainage plans comply with special provisions that were created for each of the above special overlay areas. lf a proposed project is in a designated critical drainage area, an area · included in an adopted master drainage plan, a basin plan, a lake management plan, or a shared drainage facility plan then the project shall comply with the drainage requirements of each of the governing documents. How this Project Complies: There are no critical drainage areas, master drainage plans, basin plans, lake management plans, or shared facility drainage plans for the area of the proposed project. Therefore, this Special Requirement does not apply. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT NO. 2: FLOODPLAINIFWODWAY DELINEATION Requirement: lf a proposed project contains or is adjacent to a stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, or if other King County regulations require the study of flood hazards, then the 100-year floodplain boundaries ( and floodway, if available or if improvements are proposed within a JOO-year floodplain) based on our approved flood hazard study ( described below) shall be delineated on the site improvement plans and profiles, and on any final subdivision maps prepared for the proposed project. How this Project Complies: There are no streams, lakes, wetlands, or closed depressions immediately adjacent to the project site, nor are there other King County regulations requiring the study of flood hazards in the area of the project site. Therefore, this Special Requirement does not pertain to this project. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT NO. 3: FLOOD PROTECTION FACILITIES Requirement: lf a proposed project either 1) contains or is adjacent to a Class I or fl stream that has an existing flood protection facility (such as a levee, revetment, or berm), OR 2) proposes to construct a new or to modify an existing flood protection facility, then the flood protection facility shall be analyzed and/or designed to conform with the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) regulations (44CFR). How this Project Complies: This project is not adjacent to a Class I or II stream that has an existing flood protection facility nor will it propose to construct a new or to modify an existing flood protection facility. Therefore, this Special Requirement does not apply to this project. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT NO. 4: SOURCE CONTROLS 11614.004.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .-') C) Requirement: If a proposed project is either 1) a commercial, industrial, or multi-family site development, OR 2) a redevelopment project proposing improvements to an existing commercial, industrial, multi-fatnily site, then the project must provide water quality source controls applicable to the proposed project in accordance with the King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual and King County Code 9.12. How this Project Complies: This project is a single-family residential development, therefore this Special Requirement does not apply. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT NO. 5: OIL CONTROL Requirement: If a proposed project either 1) develops a site which will have high use site characteristics, _OR 2) is a redevelopment project proposing $100,000 or more of · improvements to an existing high use site, then the project must treat runoff from the high use portion of the site using oil control treatment options from the high use menu. How this Project Complies: This project does not qualify as a high use site. Therefore, is not subject to this Special Requirement. 11614.004.doc I I n I I I I I I I Io I I I I I I I ii ) \ I\ BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Short Subdivision File No. L04S0003 Rathinam Short Plat DECISION The following outline provides each of your comments in italics exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: Proposed Short Plat revised and received August 26, 2004 (Attachment 1) is GRANTED PRELIMINARY . APPROVAL; subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. Title 19A A. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code. Response: The platting provisions in Title 19A of the King County Code will be complied with. B. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. Response: All owners of the subject property will sign on the face of the final short subdivision. C. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording Response: The utilities within the proposed rights-of-way will be included within a franchise prior to final short plat recording. D. Modifications to the approved preliminary site plan ( Attachment I) are needed to allow for the extension of JUDT to lots 3 and 5. A revised site plan shall be submitted to DDESfor review and approval. If additional modifications are required to accommodate engineering conditions, then those. must be included in the revised plan. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal. Response: The JUDT has been eliminated from the proposal. 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter One of the Surface Water Design Manual. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and -1-11614.002.doc [IH/tep] I I n I I I I I I I I () I I I I I I I I I_) I the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. A. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit drainage and engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by DDES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the DDES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. Response: The drainage plans and analysis comply with t.he 1998 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual. Engineering plans will be submitied to ODES for review and approval upon payment of fees. A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled when appropriate. B. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. Response: Standard plan and ESC notes are included on the engineering plans. C. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." Response: The note described above will be included on the final recorded plat. 3. 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the KCRS, including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. DDES strongly recommends the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the proiect. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall be done in accordance with KCRS established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended ( 1993 KCRS) and shall comply with the following requirements: A. A road variance application regarding intersection spacing was approved by King County 011 May 11', 2004. The final engineering plans/or the short plat shall comply with all conditions of approval for the road variance decision. Response: The final engineering plans are in compliance with the road variance for this project. -2-11614.002.doc [IWtep] I I I i) I I I I I I I () I I I I I I I I ' ) I B. That portion of the north half of SE 192nd Street adjoining the subject property shall be improved to an urban principal arterial standard per KCRS Section 1.03. Response: The north half of S.E. 192nd Street is proposed to be improved to an urban principal arterial as shown on the engineering plans. C. Twenty feet (20) of additional right-of-way for SE 192"d Street shall be dedicated along the south property line, allowing for 50 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Response: The southern 20 feet of the property has been dedicated, allowing 50 feet of right-of-way from centerline. D. The on-site road shall be constructed to a public urban subaccess standard per KCRS Section 2.03. Response: The on-site road has been designed in accordance with KCRS Section 2.03 as a public urban subaccess. E. A 25-foot property line radii shall be dedicated at the intersection of the on-site road and SE 192nd Street per KCRS Section 2. JO. Response: The 25-foot property line radius is dedicated at the intersection of the on-site road and S .E. 192nd Street. F. The joint-use-driveway tract (JUDT) shall be extended to reach lots 5 and 3. Lots 3 and 5 shall have undivided ownership of the access Traci and be responsible for its maintenance. A note to this effect shall be placed on the engineering plans and.final plat. Response: The joint-use driveway tract has been eliminated from the proposal. G. The minimum roadway improvements within the JUDT shall be 18 feet wide and 20 feet long with controlled drainage. This tract shall also meet the Fire Marshal requirements (See Fire marshal requirements for additional access standards) .. Response: The JUDT has been eliminated from the proposal. H. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be provided al the north terminus of the on-site road per KCRS Section 2.08). Response: A temporary cul-de-sac has been provided as seen on the engineering plans. 1. The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.0lf. full width pavement overlay is required when widening existing asphalt. Response: The proposed road improvements address road surfacing requirements outlined in the KCRS. J. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. Response: Street trees have been included in the design and are included on the landscape plans. -3-11614.002.doc [111/tep] I I n I I I I I I I I () I I I I I I I ! I I K. Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRS 5.03. Response: Street illumination has been provided. L. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. Response: No modifications to the road standards are proposed. M. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (I) All private easements and/or tracts to. be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs,. assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. Response: The above note will be included on the final short plat. (2) There shall be no direct vehicular access to and from SE 192"d Street from the abutting lots (KCRS Section 2.02). Access shall be from the on-site road. Response: The above note will be included on the final short plat. (3) Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac and extension of the sidewalk shall be the responsibility of the developer who extends the road. Response: The above note will be included on the final short plat. (4) All utilities within proposed rights-of-way shall be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short subdivision recording. Response: The above note will be included on the final_ short plat. ( 5) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall .be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. Response: The above note will be included on the final short plat. 4. Health (KCC 13) A. This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District( s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. Response: Verification from the water and/or sewer district(s) will be provided prior to final recording. -4-11614.002.doc [IWtep] I I [~) I I I I I I I I (-) I I I I I I I I I 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) A. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. Response: The provisions of KCC 16.82 will be complied with. B. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with KCC 16.82.150 requirements at engineering and final short plat. Response: The requirements of KCC 16.82.150 have been complied with, as seen on the engineering plans. 6. Fire Code (KCC 17)-Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code: A. All portions of the exterior walls ( at grade) of future residences constructed within this short plat must be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via .an approved route around the building)from approved fire apparatus access. Approved access is a minimum 20joot wide driving swface that supports 25 tons in all weather, is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end and with no gradient in excess of 15%. Response: The fire apparatus will be designed in accordance with the applicable regulations. All proposed roadways have been designed in accordance with KCRS. B. If a suitable access as described above is not provided, any future .,esidences constructed on lots 3, 5 and 9 MAY have to be sprinklered per NFPA 13D The proposed driveways serving the main body of these lots does not meet the minimum 20joot width requirement and portions of the exterior walls may be over 150 feet from approved access as outlined above. Response: Lots 3, 5, and 9 will be accessed directly from the subaccess street. C. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. Response: Approval from the King County Fire Protection Engineer will be obtained .. 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A): A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 2/A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Response: The proposal is for nine lots on 2.2 acres, which is less than the base density afforded by the R-6 zone. -5-11614.002.doc [IH/tep] I I n I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I B. Three additional lots may be created through the subdivision of Lot 7 as long as the zaning of the site remains R-6. This shall be noted on the recorded short plat. Lot 7 shall be developed in such a way that does not prevent any future short subdivision. Response: The subdivision of Lot 7 is not proposed since the lots have been reconfigured. C. Street Trees (KCC 2/A.16) Street trees shall be provided along the street frontage and the new on site road as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 2/A.16.050): I. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. Response: Street trees are proposed at the proper rate, as seen on the landscape plans. 2. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards; unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. Response: Street trees are proposed with the right-of-way dedication, as seen on the landscape plans. 3. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. Response: To our knowledge, King County has not objected to street trees in this location. 4. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. Response: Ownership and maintenance of the street trees will be described on the final plat documents. 5. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. Response: The street trees proposed do not include the trees listed above and will be submitted to DDES for review and approval. 6. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. Response: A street tree plan and bond quantity sheet will be submitted. -6-11614.002.doc {IH/tep) I I .[J I I I I I I I I () I I I I I I I I I 7. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 192nd is on a bus route. lf it is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. Response: If S.E. 192nd Street is part of a Metro bus route, the street tree plan will be reviewed by Metro Service Planning. 8. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the short plat. lf a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. Response: The above conditions will be followed as required. D. P-Suffixl SDO Conditions (KCC 21A.38) -To implement KCC 21A.38.230 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan and the engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements ofKCC 21A.38.230, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan which is part of the hearing record for this project. No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B4. The placement of impervious surfaces.fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 2IA.38.230B4d(2). Response: A detailed tree retention plan has been submitted with the engineering plans. E. The 4500-squarejoot recreation tract is consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table{s], benches, etc.). (I). An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES, with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and general improvements. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the overall conceptual plan. Response: A recreation space plan has been provided with the landscape plans. (2). A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with the overall conceptual plan, as detailed in item a., shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the final plat documents. The landscape plan shall be prepared in accordance with KCC 2JA.16. Response: A detailed recreation space plan will be submitted prior to or concurrent with the final plat documents. -7-11614.002.doc [IH/tep] I I () I I I I I I I I (J I I I I I I I I .) I ( 3 ). A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording ofthe plat. Response: A performance bond for the recreation space will be posted prior to final recording. 8. Road Mitigation Payment System: The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording, or (B.) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." lfthe second option is chosen. the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. Response:· The option will be decided by the project owner and appropriate notes will be added to the final plat documents. 9. A homeowner's association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of · DDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the Recreation Tract. Response: A Homeowners Association will be established for the ownership and maintenance of the recreation tract. Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit ,an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances Response: All required permits required for the project will be obtained prior to construction. B. The short subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. Response: The subdivision complies with KCC 16.82 in regard to grading. C. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division Response: All registrations and licenses will be obtained, as appropriate. -8-11614.002.doc [IH/tep] I •. (")' I I I I I I I 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS I() I I I I I I I \ ' . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (-) 3.0 () OFF-SITE ANALYSIS A Level I Drainage Analysis was prepared by Cramer Northwest Inc., dated February 2, 2004. This drainage analysis has been verified and is contained within this section of the Technical Information Report. 3.1 Study Area Definition The enclosed Exhibit A, Vicinity Map, shows the approximate location of the proposed site. The existing site has slopes that are approximately 2 percent across the majority of the site. The total relief across the site is 8 feet from west to southeast, sloping in the southeasterly direction. There is one existing single-family residence located on the site, with adjacent outbuildings. Overall, the undeveloped portions of the site contain a pasture-type area with grasses, brush, and some trees. The on-site soils range from silt loam to gravely sandy loam also known as the Alderwood-type soils. The soils map can be seen in Exhibit B. The existing on-site residence will be demolished for this development and the proposed single-family lots will be constructed with the appropriate pipe conveyance, water quality and detention facilities, all on site to mitigate stormwater requirements in accordance with the 1998 KCWSWDM. Upstream Drainage Analysis: Based on our site· visit, there minimal upstream flow onto the subject property from the west. Resource Review: • Adopted Basin Plans: The site is part of the Soos Creek drainage basin. • Finalized Drainage Studies: This is not applicable. • Basin Reconnaissance Summary Report: The site is located in the Black River drainage basin. The Reconnaissance Summary Report is included in Exhibit C. • Critical Drainage Area Maps: Per the King County Flow Control Applications Map, the site is subject to Level 2 Flow Control and Basic water Quality Protection. • Floodplain and Floodway FEMA Maps: The FEMA map for this area shows that the site is located in Zone X and is not subject to flooding. • Other Off-Site Analysis Reports: A review of Exhibit C (Basin Reconnaissance Summary Report) and a site investigation were conducted in preparation of this Level I Drainage Analysis. • Sensitive Areas Folios: Based on a review of the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folios, it was found that the subject site does not contain SAO Wetlands, as seen in Exhibit D. • Road Drainage Problems: This is not applicable. 11614.004.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,) l) • United States Department of Agriculture King County Soils Survey: Based on the soils map for this area, the entire site is located within Alderwood-type soils. • Wetland Inventory Map: There are no wetlands located on or adjacent to the site. • Migrating River Studies: This is not applicable. 3.2 Field Inspection There were no problems reported or observed during the resource review. Based on the review of the drainage complaint list provided by King County, there are no existing complaints on the downstream drainage course that are a result of runoff from the subject property nor are there any constrictions or lack of capacity in the existing drainage system as determined by the field visit, nor did the field reconnaissance find any potential constrictions or lack of capacity in the existing drainage system downstream of the site. Conveyance System Nuisance Problems, Type 1: Conveyance system nuisance problems, in general, are defined as any existing or predicted flooding or erosion that does not constitute a severe flooding or erosion problem. Conveyance system nuisance problems are defined as flooding or erosion that results in the overflow of the constructed conveyance system for runoff events less than or equal to a 10-year event. Examples include inundation of a shoulder or lane of roadway, overflows collecting in yards or pastures, shallow flows across driveways, minor flooding in crawlspaces or unheated garages/outbuildings, and minor erosion. A recent review of the drainage complaint list provided by King County showed no evidence of past conveyance system nuisance problems occurring, nor was there any evidence of any occurring during our site visit. Severe Erosion Problems, Type II: Severe erosion problems are defined as downstream channels, ravines or slopes with evidence of or potential for erosion/incision sufficient to pose a sedimentation hazard to downstream conveyance systems or pose a landslide hazard by undercutting adjacent slopes. Severe erosion problems do not include roadway or minor ditch erosion. Based on our site visit and review of the drainage complaint list, there is no evidence of or potential for erosion/incision sufficient to pose a sedimentation hazard to downstream conveyance systems evident anywhere along the downstream drainage course. Severe Flooding Problems, Type III: Severe flooding problems can be caused by conveyance system overflows in elevated water surfaces and ponds, lacks, wetlands, or closed depressions. Severe flooding problems are defined as follows: I. Flooding of the finished area of an inhabited building for runoff events less than or equal to the 100-year event. Examples include flooding of finished floors of homes or commercial and industrial buildings and flooding in electrical/heating systems and components in the crawlspace or garage of a home. Such problems are referred to as "severe building flooding problems." 2. Flooding over all lanes of a roadway or severely impacting a sole access driveway for runoff events less than or equal to the 100-year event. Such 11614.004.doc I I n I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I j I I problems are referred to as "severe roadway flooding problems." As mentioned previously, there is no evidence of flooding from the drainage complaints or from our site visit downstream of the subject property. As mentioned previously, there is no evidence of flooding from the drainage complaints or from our site visit downstream of the subject property. 3.3 Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions Runoff leaves the site by sheetflowing to the southeastern portion of the site, where it enters an open roadside ditch. From the roadside ditch on S.E. 192nd Street, the runoff is conveyed easterly down S.E. 192nd through a series of open ditches, culverts, and underground storm drainage pipes, and eventually discharges into Soos Creek. Due to proposed frontage improvements, the existing ditches and driveway culverts that. are located in the project's frontage will be replaced with an enclosed conveyance system. The downstream conveyance system is in good condition and minimal erosion was observed. A review of the drainage complaint list showed few complaints on the downstream drainage course; therefore, the project site is considered developable as proposed. 3.4 Mitigation of Existing and Potential Problems The area downstream of the proposed project does not exhibit any potential problems. Since the 1998 KCWSWDM has indicated that Level 2 Flow Control and Basic Water Quality Treatment are required, which this project uses these standards for this development, and they are assumed to be adequate for this site. This project will neither aggravate nor create a problem as specified in the problem-specific mitigation requirements set forth in the 1998 KCWSWDM as delineated in Task 4 of this report. 11614.004.doc I I n I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I I I I \ _) EXHIBIT A I I " I • i( I '" I I I I I I I I I I I I r5 I VICINITY MAP I In . . I I I I I I I IO I I I I I I I ( _) I I EXHIBITB I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOILS MAP I I I r1 I I I I I I I I C) I I I I I I 11 I ' ) I I I I EXHIBIT C. ' Rathinam Short Plat -Sensitive Areas . I Map Output I @King County L.I ""'oo..,,,."',,°"''@"---'I ~I ~ro== .. '=@~11 ~ 11 @h,,,m .. ;CFJ 11 ~ ru1$c; 1 u1 1 ""'""""~'(, 1--go1.s_ 00,1: ~~ow...J 8 ~ 02o)~J:u,J 0012 oiJ loafo 619 ·ww 9H3 uaru,10100 p7t~:~ 0021 Iii f;a J O't I g., 1,1 >------OO<t.2 >: 022-i (J22 20 ' ~.._.,.ai,0160 \ Tc On,M <: 0~22 0200 I t=-~ (J1 0062 OOtH :i: 7!_ 1, _.(OB!o SEj189TH ST 0065 J-; 02"11 02,15 ~; (.12,Jj j i(J2,f'l OOS9 002q 9g/jv QJ:lv £ SE 189TH UN Cl063 0066 02·M I (J2,f2 oo,ro ~·on<li ./ --, , ~ I ooso ~:/ onri},' u,90 ooao 026() 00,11 "-)Ji/ ,> (I) "' "' , "'I u, '{,:,;, ~ z ' i,.J I .. w o·ioo 0280 0·;120 ~ w ' :> :>1 -0;126 0127 18'' "' Z·9036 <J <· '"' ' 'x~~-~;~ .,,. :I: z:: l 01·'2 1 "18, ' c,) ~. ... 0125 0300 ..... 0211) / _±. Oz,to ~l "' o' ~ "' ,e::::f-~ ~ ~ 0Lt(J ~11~ f l OH3 0185 I B~ ()j,fO 0320 0205 -----01$0 ~~ OM1 UJ Ill ,____ ();1.:::2 ..i ~-,/ \ l~' 01ao I (1,:l<f Q..i'0183 Q·;t.51 l::,. t,-,-<!·=- 10)0 / 19~1, -''" O:'J60 03,11 03,tu rT" f.--<I) 9320 II ,l 90)8 i' "I 9-H:;() E;cm12 L .. !-'"" 9031 0163 E·1921m·sl'- 925!1 Ll 9·!03 1 ooos [ loo, I~ ~~~ -r;; OU10 oo·,6 ,1 0(09 DUH: 0CJ2CJ uJ OOH I OiJ26, .. ~ ------'f OJ I ""''" -~' / ~1-- 90/3 9LJU~ 91LH r+--1-9:33(.1 ~JE11JJiJ,~)! E 1--CJOW N Q2j0 ~1= 905cl I , I I I I I 1 1 \ OU15 .,.., +"' ,1 U!..~W U11U\.._ 11 UC.184' 9CJ65 0076 0075 i.ltlt:b (Wt>$ DU6U ' U08J {C) :«S3 Kine Co~nt)' 0 0.113mi1 I I I I I I I I I I ~ ;v' Legend S.alacled Pa rCtJ Is Cl.izl 1 -· County Boun-dary .. Un::f~:i•~ I Slreals D Lak..is and Larga Riv,ars ~ Hi,;p"'.ti /./ Slreams 1"re-i:J.~ ~ Floadway I ,,.~ .. / = IEE] 100 Y-aar Floodplain D Pa reals m SAO li't'a LI.a lid SAO Sir.a.am l:2:1 SAO L.:1ndslida ~ Cl.:i:z 1 EEEil SAO Coal Min.a cr.:i~ 2 P...!rerni~I, ~ SAO S,aismic tv C!.r-.~2-Si..Jm,:.111·,:1 SAO Erosion I I 10:i:rtf he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety ot sources and is subject to change without notice. Klng County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to 1he use of such I information. King County shall not be liable for any genera!, special, indirect, incidental. or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on his mao is orohibited exceot bv written permission of Kina Countv. Kina County \ GJS center l ~I~ I Comments I ~ By visiting this and olher King County web pages. you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details I htto ://www 5 .metro kc. gov /serv let/com .esri .esrimap. Esrimap ·J ServiceN ame=overv iew &Client Versi... l l/ 4/2004 I I --('' ,.\ ) I I I I I I I . ") t_ I I I I \ I I I I I I ) I: - •\ RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 2 SOOS CREEK BASIN JANUARY 1986 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface \Yater Management Division King County, \Vashington I I ,o I I I I I I I (:) I I I I I I I I t) I Department of PubLic Works Don LaBelle, Director King County Executive Tim Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District 5 Bruce Laing, District 6 Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Pari<.s, Planning and Resoun:es · Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division ·Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Dave Clark, Manager, River & Water Natural Resoun:es and Parks Division Russ Cahill, Division Manager . Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Derek Poon, Chief, Resources Planning Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Resource Section Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project ~1anagement and Design Section Contributing Staff Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Randall Parsons, Sr. Engineer Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Bn1ce Barker, Engineer Arny Stankus, Engineer Ray Steiger, Engineer Pete Ringen, Enginet:r Consulting Staff Don Spencer: Associate Geologist. Earth Consultants. Inc. John Bethel: Soil Scientist. Earth Consultants: [nc. P:CR Contributing Staff Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Manhew Clark, Project Manager Robert R. Fuerstenberg, Biologist & Team Leader Manhew J. Bruengo. Geologist Lee Benda, Geologist Derek Booth, Geologist Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker. Earth Scientist Di Johnson. Planning Support Technician Robert Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Bentler. Planning Support Technician Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon C!auseni Planning Support Technician David Tn.1ax, Planning Support Technician Brian Vanderburg, Planning. Support Technician Carolyn M. Byerly. Technical \Vritcr Sus,rnna Hornig:, Technical \Vriter Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNultv, Tvpesetter Mildred Miller, Tvpesetter Jaki Reed, Tvpesetter Lela Lira, Office Technician ~lartv Co,, Office Technician I I '') .,(1_, I I I I I I I ") l_ I I I I I I I I t.,) I L IL III. [V. V. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION FINDINGS IN SOOS CREEK BASIN A. Overview B. Effects of Urbanization C. Specific Problems I. Bank failures 2. Channel erosion 3. Flooding and potential flooding 4. Stream habitat RECOMMENDATIONS A. B. C. D. E. MAP Inform appropriate governmental agencies of the reconnaissance findings Reevaluate specific surface water management policies Prepare a comprehensive basin plan Construct the capital improvement projects Maintain or enhance instream and riparian habitats APPENDICES: .-\PPENDlX A: Estimated Costs APPENDL'C 8: Capital [mprovement Project Ranking APPEND[X C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 .j 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 A-I 8-1 C-I I I C{'' , _.,, ,I I I I I I I I CJ I I I I I I I I ( _) I L SUMMARY The Soos Creek Basin is located north and east of the Green River in King County. While the southern and eastern portions of the basin are rural, the remainder is a ·rapidly expanding suburban community. This development pattern has not caused serious environmental damage or flooding, however, due to highly pervious soils, an extensive network of streams and wetlands that provide natural storage for stormwater runoff, and the fact that development has only recently accelerated in this basin. Although the overall severity of problems in the Soos Creek Basin was not great at the time of reconnaissance, several significant problems were identified and should be addressed. These include bank failures, channel erosion, flooding in some locations, and poor stream habitaL Recommendations to address these problems include efforts to 1) inform appropriate agencies of the reconnaissance findings, 2) reevaluate specific policy issues regarding the management of surface water, 3) . prepare a comprehensive basin plan, 4) construct the capital improvement projects evaluated with c1t1zen advisory committee criteria, and 5) maintain or enhance habitat throughout the basin. II. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program P:SCB In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division,-to conduct a reconnaissance ·of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins --Evans, Soos. and Hylebos Creeks •• in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recommend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology, and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program: which was subsequently established, is now an important element of surf<:1ce water management. The goals of the program are to provide useful data with regard to I) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage conditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in developing more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. Thev are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion problems: instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as descriptive environmental narratives rather than as final engineering conclusions. Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mirigati\'c measures for each particular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmcnra! protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate extent of such measures will be decided on a case·by-case basis by County officials responsible for revie\1,·ing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among competing projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute I I I I n I I I I I I I (_) I I I I I. I I I (_ J I m. P:SCB Soos Creek Basin ( continued) for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis for any proposal. FINDINGS IN SOOS CREEK BASIN Reconnaissance in the Soos Creek Basin was conducted in November 1985 by Ray Heller, resource planner; Randall Parsons, engineer; and Don Spencer and John Bethel, consulting soil scientists. Their findi.~gs and recommendations are presented as follows. A Overview of Soos Creek Basin Geographic and land use features. The Soos Creek Basin is located north and east of the Green River in the eastern portion of the Soos Creek Plateau Community Planning Area. The basin is situated east of the city of Kent, northeast of Auburn, and southeast of Renton. The city of Seattle's Lake Youngs watershed is included in the Soos Creek Basin. The south and east portions of the basin are rural in character, with the north and west portions committed to a suburban development pattern that includes subdivisions and scattered single-family homes. .The 1985 King Countv Comprehensive Plan shows areas east of Big Soos Creek (in the northern part of the basin) and south of Lake Youngs with "rural development" designations that specify 1-5 dwelling units (DU) per acre. The southern area to the east of Soos Creek and north of the Green River is designated "transitional." This interim designation will limit development to rural- residential densities until such time as rural/urban designations are made through updated comm·unity plans. The King County Parks Department owns more than a five-mile stretch from Southeast 192nd Street to Lake Meridian, along Big Soos Creek. These presently undeveloped park lands are mostly wetlands and lie within the 100-year floodplain. Major geologic, hydraulic, and bydrologic features. The Soos Creek drainage area is a tributary basin to the Green River basin. The area is part of the Puget Sound lowlands and is characterized by a glacial drift plain, covered by small ridges and rounded hills that were formed by continental' glaciation. While the Soos Creek Basin is moderately developed, the degree and amount of channel erosion, slope failures1 and other forms of geologic and hydraulic damage are far less than might be expected. Artificial conveyances are also still functioning in this basin as they were originally designed and intended. These conditions may be explained by three main factors. First, there is a very effective natural retention and detention (R/D) system provided by an extensive netv.:ork of 52 wetlands and numerous major and minor streams. iv1ost of the wetlands are located in the northern portion of the basin in the upland areas as well as adjacent to streams. Big Soos Creek originates in the northeast corner of the plateau and flows southeast to the junction of Little Soos and Jenkins Creeks, then cur.1 es wesc at its confluence with Covington Creek. Big Soos Creek joins the Green Ri\·er east of Auburn near State Road (SR) IS at 160th Avenue SE. These wetlands and streams appear to be functioning \veil as stormv .. ·ater comrot facilities for the current leve!s of development: as \1.:e\l as serving to prevent damage from surface water runoff. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• (~) l P:SCB B. C. Soos Creek Basin (continued) Second, the soils in the upland areas generally have a high infiltrative capacity, particularly in the southern portion of the basin. Stonnwater is absorbed into the ground at these locations before it can cause erosion or other damage. Third, development in the basin has only just begun. Properly functioning wetlands and streams have not yet been altered, nor have well-draining soils been covered by impervious surfaces to any great extent. Maintaining these properly functioning drainage systems should be a goal in this basin and will be the focus of recommendations made later in the report. Habitat characteristics. The habitat of Soos Creek Basin is generally good and supports large populations of both native and hatchery anadromous fish. The source of the hatchery fish is a State facility near the mouth of Soos Creek. Cutthroat trout reside in stream waters, and anadromous fish spawn and travel in many of the tributaries and the main stem of Big Soos,. according to field obseivations and reports from local residents at the time of reconnaissance. Habitat is being damaged or threatened in some places by bank erosion and degraded water quality associated with land clearing, livestock feces, and wetland filling for development. One of the more serious instances of habitat-threatening erosion originates at the parking lot of the Seattle International Raceway (SIR), which is located on the plateau in the lower portion of the basin. Drainage from the paved parking lot is increasing erosion in· nearby tributaries and filling spawning gravels with sediment. Appendix C of this report identifies sites of habitat damage or potential damage. Further water quality information related to habitat in the basin can be found in the Critical Stream lnventorv of Soos Creek, pµblished by Metro. Effects of Urbanirntion Low levels of development in most parts of the Soos Creek Basin, together with a well~funct_ioning natural drainage system: have kept serious erosion1 sedimentation1 and habitat damage to a minimum until now. However, the present and projected rares of development indicate that there could be increasing amounts of damagei as suggested by the types of problems observed during reconnaissance. The expansion of impervious surfaces in the basin is already beginning to accelerate the rates and volumes of stormwater flowing into (and reducing the capacities of) both natural and artificial channels. Impervious surfaces are also reducing the amount of highly pervious soils available to absorb runoff. The predictable impacts are already in evidence: erosion, mass~wasting, sedimentation: and degraded water quality and other habitat destruction. The following section provides a more detailed account of problems found during field investigation. Specific Problems Identified The study team examined numerous sires along the main stem of Big Soos: Little Soos. and \Vest Soos Creeks. as \Veil as 21 small drainages tributary to these main stems. Several of the most significant problems found during reconnaissance are described belmv . 3 I I I {~ I I I, I I I I (_~) I I •• I I I rv. I I ) . I P:SCB Soos Creek Basin ( continued) 1. Bank failures. On Tributary 0072A, river mile .30, for example, there exists a major bank failure triggered by bank undercutting. The source of the problem appears to be increased runoff from street construction. Unless flows are intercepted and redirected to storm sewers or other facilities, there will be increased bank erosion and consequential deterioration of property and stream habitat. 2 Channel Erosion. This includes both instream and bank erosion caused by large volumes of runoff emerging from storm drains and washing away highly erodible soils. This creates a new, deeply incised channel that enlarges over time. One example of this problem occurs on Tributary 0072 near the SIR in the lower part of the basin. Large expanses of pavement at this location have contributed to high volume flows and channel erosion. 3. Flooding and potential flooding. In numerous locations, development has increased the amount of runoff entering existing drainage facilities or otherwise impeded the ability of natural systems to carry the amount of runoff. When . drainage systems fail to function as they were intended, flooding can occur. Increased development without concurrent increases in drainage facilities adds to the possibility that serious flooding will occur. On Tributary 0092, river mile 1.20, for example (collection point 11), the Little Soos has been contained a·nd manicured as it passes through a developed plat. Such alteration to a natural drainage channel reduces the stream's capacity in places. The result has been the regular semi-annual flooding of some homes. Further development could aggravate these kinds of flooding problems. 4. Poor stream habitat due to: a. Lack of overhead canopy and streamside vegetation. Overhead canopy stabilizes water temperature, while streamside vegetation protects banks from erosion. b. Contamination by livestock feces. In areas of the basin where livestock have extensive access to streams, water quality has become degraded by animal feces. These cause harmful nutrients to be added to the water which can threaten fish survival c. Erosion. Streambank and channel erosion, already described above, is caused in part by livestock access. On Tributary 0073, river miles 3.60-4.70, for example: there exists poor stream habitat because livestock have trampled and denuded banks of vegetation; this has led to the sedimentation of spawning areas and caused turbidity. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACDON The following recommendations are based on findings of the field team and reflect the original goals of the Basin Reconnaissance Program1 as outlined in the introduction of this report. A Inform appropriate governmental agencies of the detailed findings from the reconnaissance of this basin. Project representatives should meet with staff from King -1 0 I I ,c() I B. I I I I I I () I I I I I ·I I I I P:SCB Soos Creek Basin ( continued) . County Roads Division, Surface Water Management Division, Building and Land Development, and other interested agencies to transmit relevant information. Reevaluate specific policy issues regarding surface water management. These may include the need to: 1. Improve enforcement of wetlands regulations to maintain these areas in their natural states. This will insure their continued function as surface water quality and quantity controllers, as well as preserve their habitat value. If regulation proves ineffective; the County should secure easements or consider other means to preserve wetland areas. 2 Require the establishment of undisturbed buffe,s and setbacks adjacent to natural drainage swales. Variations in stream morphology and geology indicate the need for stream corridor guidelines that take these into consideration. Improve enforcement of "no-clearing" covenants in these sensitive areas or seek County easements or actual ownership. Fencing along streams in livestock areas would help water quality and reduce erosion and sedimentation. 3. Investigate and promote the infiltration of surface water where feasible and economical to reduce increased ru·noff from developed areas. Also, encourage the use of grass sv,•ales and open ditch conveyance systems to improve infiltration and water quality enhancement capacity. Areas of high filtration are identified on final display maps (for the Basin Reconnaissance Program) in the offices of Surface Water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. 4. Require the tightlining of storm-<lrainage outfalls down steep or sensitive slopes using state-of-the-art facilities, including high density polyethylene pipe with energy dissipation at the outfall. 5. Reevaluate stormwater rate and volume release regulations for new developments. Current regulations may be inadequate and result in unacceptable downstream erosion that causes property damage and loss of habitat. 6. Increase current maintenance levels for King County surface water RID and conveyance facilities. Due to the lack of funding, maintenance of existing facilities is sometimes insufficient and results in facility dysfunction and failure. These will only be aggravated by additional upstream development. 5 I I I (') ~. I I I I I I I C) I I I I I I I I ,_,.) I PSCB Soos Creek Basin (continued) C Prepare a comprehensiYe basin plan to consider, at a minimum, tbe need to: 1. Enhance and utili7.e tbe extensive existing wetlands as regional storm-detention facilities without jeopardizing habitat values. Prepare a schedule for the anticipated need for these hydrologic enhancements as they relate to projected development in the basin and impact the wetland ecology. 2. Examine existing storm-detention and comeyance facilities to determine whether their control orifices. are properly sized to optimize the detention site and achieve the maximum benefit to the downstream systems. 3. Establish floodplains in low-lying areas of slight gradient for existing and developed runoff conditions, i.e., adjacent to wetlands, panicularly for wetlands proposed as regional detention sites where inundation of adjacent propenies may be significant. 4. Identify stream reaches critical to the maintenance of anadromous and trout populations. 5. Review geologic findings from this study in order to identify areas of particular soils' sensitivity and develop special analysis criteria for new developments. D. Construct the capital improvement projects according to the CIP priority selection criteria These projects, identified in Appendix B of this repon, include projects to: 1 Calibrate and retrofit existing detention~control structures and to improve existing conveyance systems. 2. Stabilize channels and slopes, 3. Provide regional detention facilities, including the utilization of wetlands, where biological assessment has determined that the natural habitat values will not be significantly altered. E. Maintain or enhance the instream and riparian habitats. 1. Maintain wetlands and buffer areas around them. These provide both valuable wildlife habitat and natural stormwater storage that helps to maintain year-round baseflows in the stream. 2. Adopt a stream-eorridor policy in the Soos Creek Community Plan to protect the strt.:!am corridor from damaging types of land uses in adjacent areas. 3. Encourage the Washington Slate Depanment of FISheries to allow use of the natural stream system for salmon spawning. Maintain a natural run of all the indigenous anadromous species. 4. Prohibit filling in the 100-ycar floodplain. The Countv should establish regulations to prevent the loss of floodplains in order to maintain their natural storage for floodwaters and guard against degradation of important fish and wildlife habitat. 6 () I r -' I _!'' 1-,. '. '. ___ : .?!...:_ •• ( f. '"· I I ' lri_ .'. . !:' I I .\_.,.' ·1,., ( ~-'··· L_ .. -, ::r --~---L " • " ,. . ;• .• ,1'11•-'1 ... ''" ... :. "• 1· I ..... ·: •..... ·· 1 •• --·j •• w•.•J,· . '• ~·;.?~'-!"•. ,i • ,, . SOOS CREEK BASIN OOOQO •••••• ® ~ = = 0072 *5401 Basin Boundary Collection Point Boundary Collection Point Stream Tributary Numtier Proposed Pruject 1 mi. .. ....... ·-1·-··-• •• ·------. · •••• . . . . ~, '"•() .,.: '., i··s.;3 So...'1'-:1 ~ J ,~~1:~~:x---,-~-,.--\\. / \f ) ,t-, ~ .. i. I '• . . . ···" , .. ... • • I """ ""., \ o'." <to ! , . . ~ .. • ' Oo.,Q~~'\~ 0, . • . .. · . . . . , I y ,);r j I .,< /:~·Y '· _-:;~/ I • ,-.~\ • , . ' ,·, ~-' ·~/ ,/ •::c· i~~o,r.,i .• {..---; ;. ·-,., ... -1,-~'ifl rr,:i ······•-'"'"() •, LI I U m ST I "fR . J"{'-. -'I· I I I SOOS CREEK BASIN . . ,-•· •' • l! 00000 •••••• ® 0072 *5401 ';~tt:.'.. fl :':\ ••. r.~·.:,. ..... : ". Ba.sin Boundary Collection om . p · t Boundary Collection Point Stream Tributary Number Proposed Project \ ·1 ·. \ :.~'~.\ '{ '..r-~·- .-·· ;;,~~:'' ~.t;' "' " L .. ,.. ..• . ! ro SR f, ---------·---· --C .-... I ' '-..,I APPENDIX A lSTIMATlD COSTS: PROPOSllJ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJlCI'S SOOS CREEK UASIN NOTE: l'roicct Numhcr 5,10 I • 5-HJ2' 5,10v Indicates µrojeC:I was idenlified by !he Surlace Water Management Division prior to reconnaissance. AH projects are located on map included in this re.e_ort. Colh..:ct. Point 20 9 Proj,xt l)cscription Construct low berm (approx. 2') and proportiom1I Jischargc-control weir at oullct to wetland. (This project is inJcpcnJcnlly justifiable.) Welland r;:1ting is #2. Uiolog.ical ,1sscssmcnt is nci.;JcJ to assure this projcL:t Jocs not Jccn.:asc hahitat values. Excavate anJ hcrm to construct regional f,1cility at lower cnJ of wetland. Provide proportion.ti weir <lischargc. Wetland rating is # I. Uiological assessment is needed to assure this project docs not decrease habitat values. Could noL locate or verify. 5-104' 17 Construct a proportional control weir Wet lanJ, 4-11 <i l':S( 'll.i\l'i\ al SE 224111 SI. hriJge. (Project should bl.! ju:-itifit:d by a future hasin plan.) Wetland rating is #2. Uiological assessment is nccdcll to assure this project docs not Oct'rcasc hahitat values. i\-l Problem Addressed Mitigates inneascd upstream peak flows and runoff volumes. Mitigates increased upstream peak flows ·and ninoff. This location scives Trih. 0073 and 0076. (Good location.) Address in basin plan. Mitigalcs increased upstream peak flows and runoff. (First site that could address flows south or l'clrovitsky.) ----C) · . .._) Estimated Costs and Comments S 153,000 (likely to be much less due to fand acquisition cost) $194,000 ( dependent on land costs) (Eliminate for now.) $250,000 - ---- \._,..:ct NumlH;r 5-105'' -Colkcl. Point 19 )-l(){/' 12 Wet Janel 5-1-l-l 5-1117 I 5 Wi..:1lanJ )~120 5-108" I} l':St 'll.Al'A ----- Project Description Construct berm and proporlional control weir in Uoulcvard I ,anc P<irk. (Project shouhJ be justified hy a basin plan.) Wctlands rating is #1 Uiological assessment is nceJcJ to assure this project docs not t.kncasc habitat values. c:onst met out let-control st ruct urc at existing culvert passing flow under SE 2)(11h St. (ProjcCt would he inJcpenJcntly .iustifiahlc.) \Vctland rating is #2. Uiological ·as.scssmcnt is nccth.:J to assure 111.is project docs not th..:cn..:asc habitat v,ilucs. Construct a hcrm amf proportional Jischargc weir at oullct of existing wt.:tlarn.J. (Project should he justi- ficcl hy " h.isin plan.) Wctlancl rating, is #2. is neeUcll to Uiological assessment a~sure this projecl docs not Uccrcase habitat values. Raise the SE 240th St. roaUway approximately 2' anU construct a new bridge with proportional <.:ontrol weir. (Project shoulU he justified hy a hasin plan.) Wctlancl rating is #2. Uiolog.ical assessment is necJed to assure this rro.jcrt Jocs not llerrcasc habit.ii valui:s. -,--,. u ---- Problem Addressed Mitiga1es increased upstream peak flows and ninoff .. Mitigarcs increased upstream peak flows and ninoff. May provide extra detention to assist in alleviating capacity problems far downstream. Mitigates increased upstream peak flows and runoff. Mitigates increased upstream peak flows ancl rnnoff. (Good location.) A-2 -----'\ Estimated Cc,,J and Comments $98,000 $17,800 $228,000 $70,000 'I"") -- - -----z:_, Pro_ji.:ct Number Colkct. Point .,w•r n Wctlantl 'i4.1J <;,J IO" 8 V.'dlanc..l 5488 'i4 It· 18 \Vctland 547(1 'i412'' 16 Wctlantl 'i480 :\-11 Y' .1 \V1.:tl;1nd 5--t77 I'S( :ll.i\1'1\ ---------- Project Description Construct berm anJ proportional control weir at outlet to Clark I .ikc. (Project coultl he indepcndcnlly justi[icd.) WctlanJ rating is # 1. Uiological assessment is needed to assure this pro- ject Jol:s not Jccrcasc habitat values. Construct central manhole at outlet of cxi:,;ting pomJ. Dead storage should be maintaincJ for aesthetics. (Project sccms of VCI)' limited value.) Wctl..rnd rating is #2. Small wetland locatcJ near top of suhhasin; maintain condition as is. Wetland rating is #2. Uiological assessment is nccdct..l ·IO assure this pro_jct Llocs not decrease hahit;.1t values. Construct berm and proportional control weir al outlet lo wetlaml. (Project should be justified hy future basin plan.) Wetlantl rating is #2. IJiological assessment is needed to assure this project docs not decrease habitat values. Construct berm and proportional control weir al outlet 10 wetland adjacent to SI( 18. (Project should he justified hy future basin plan.) Wetland rating is #2. Uiological assessment is nceJcd to assure this project docs not decrease hahitat values. ' , ............ ) \...._,) A-1 Problem Addressed Mitigates increased upstream peak [lows and runoff volumes. May provide extra detention to alleviate capacity problem downstr~am. Provides continued detention for 1110hilc home park plus small amount of additional area. No project proposed. Maintain wetland in its existing state. Mitigalt?S increased upstream peak flows and runoff. Mitigates increased upstream peak [lows and runoff. (May not he as desirable as Projects 5419 and 5420.) ---8- Estimated Costs and Comments $221,000 (depending on land costs) $28,000 (Eliminate for now.) $246,500 ( dependent on land costs) $193,600 ( dependent c:>n land costs) - ---p_....:..i,~ct ' h_~ 5-11-1 5-115 5-111, 5-117 5-11 ~ 5-11 ') .1.1 co 1':SC:U.1\1'1\ -Collect. Point 2 11 11 I:, 10 11 -----Proji;cl Ocscription Const nu.:t hcrm anJ excavate to provide at..lditional detention volume. Construct a control manhole. (Project b inllcpcntkntly juslifiahlc.) Construct tightlinc system in existing stream channel. (Project is independently justifahh.:.) Construct new landscaped hcrms adjacent to existing privately owncJ and main- lilinc.:d stream channel to i1H.:rcasc capacity and prevent ncighhorhood flooJing. (Pro.jcct is independently justif..1hlc.) Raise 148th Ave. SE roauway approx. 1.5' anU construct proportional control w1,;ir at SL: 256th hric..Jgc. (Project is inJcpcnJcntly justifahlc.) Cons! rucl control weir at hriJgc on SL: I .akc Youngs Way. (Projct.:1 should ht: justifir.:d hy fulun; basin plan. Construe! proporlional weir tit existing hriJgc. (Pro_jet:I sho~tlJ ~)C justified hy future ha.sin pla~.) Divert excess flows from I .iltk Soos inlo ahanUoncJ hmT(>w pil for infiltra- tion. (Prnjt:cl should ht: juslificJ by future basin plan.) -------' I \_,I Problem Addressed Mi1iga1c increased ups1ream peak flows and runoff. Reconstruct discharge from SE 320th St. to stable oullcl. (Justifiable immcdialcly due to impacts on state fish halchcry.) Prevcnls further road embankment and steep cul-bank failures. (Juslified immedialely due 10 impacts on slate fish h·a1chery.) Prevent neighborhood flooding, which jcop~m.Jizcs 3-4 homes by conlaining stream as it passes lhrough plat. (Juslifiablc immediately as situation will ~nly worsen wilh upslream ucvclopmcnt.) Eliminate seasonal. flooding of roadway and mitigate increased upstream peak flows and runoff. (Juslifiable immcdialcly due 10 floouing of roadway.) Mitigate increased upstream peak. flows and i-unoff. Mitigate incrcascJ upslrcam peak flows und runoff volumCs. (Site appca.rs more tlcsirahle than 5413 due to case of <HXeSS.) Mitigate increaseJ upstream peak flows ,1nt.J runoff volumes. (This is a highly 1..ksirahlc al1ern,11ivc t.Juc t~ groundwater recharge and quality conlrol.) A-4 ---Estimaled Cf".-,,, and Commer....._ ) $169,000 $156,000 $223,000 $88,700 $138,000 (depenucnt on land use cosls) $88,500 0 - I •n c. J I ... I I I I I I I {-) . _, I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING SOOS CREEK BASIN Prior to the Soos Creek watershed field reconnaissance, 13 projects had been identified and rated using the CIP selection criteria developed by the Surface Water Management (SWM) Division and the Natural Resources and Parks Division. Following the reconnaissance, 20 projects remain proposed for this area. They include the 7 new, previously unidentified and unrated projects plus the initial 13 projects. The previous SWM capital improvements project list for the Soos Creek Basin had an estimated cost of S3,450,000, while the revised list decreases to an estimated cost of 52,622,000. This 24% reduction in estimated capital costs is due mainly to downward revised cost figures for acquiring or securing easements OVer wetlands. The followi~g table summarizes the scores and costs for the CIPs proposed for the Hylebos Creek Basin. The projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below are those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: "GO/NO-GO," could be answered affirmatively. The projects can now be considered for merging into the "live" CIP list. Any project scoring over 100 points should be considered for incorporation into the six-year CIP plans. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE COST 1 5415 135 s 156,000 2 5417 127 223,000 3 5407' 113 228,000 4 5414 105 169,000 5 5409' 100 221,000 6 5416 98 68,400 7 5402" 95 194,000 8 5401" 59 153,000 9 5406' 33 17.800 TOTAL S!,430,000 Indicates pro_iect \vas identified by S\Vt\·1 prior to the reconnaisance. ------\__ --------' ' \._.; APPENDIX C DETAIi.ED FINDINGS /\ND RECOMMENDATIONS SOOS CREEK UJ\SIN - All ilcrns lislell here are localed on final display maps in the offices of Surface Waler Management, building and Land ___ .I)cvelopnient. and Oasin Planning. Trill. & Colkcl. Item l\ivi.:r Mill: Point Category 2 llll72 IZM 2.X~ 0072 RM .r,o l':S<:U.J\l'C 1 lydrology 1,J,I~ llahilal IJ,17, 18,19, 211 Exbling Prop. Proj. Conditions anti Problems Sec hem 6. llabilal of upper stream good from buffer of cx1cn- sivc wetlands and mainten- ance hy County Parks Dept. Problems on 562 acres or wellands include illegal filling, livcs1ock-rcla1cd bank erosion, debris in stream. There is a greater dcgn.:c or lh.:vclopmcnt aJjaccnt 10 st ream. Main stem proviJcs important re.iring habitat for salmonitJ species. C-1 Anticipated Conditions and Problems Main stem will he strained to accommo<latc increased volume of runoff from developing areas upstream. Uank erosion (causing increased siltation and habitat dcslruclion) and slope failures (leading to propcl'ly damage) will result. More filling of wetlands. Sediment from adjacent devel- opment will fill ponions of wetlands and stn:am channel due to low gradients. More debris, pollution, and flood- ing: will result from additiona development. ----,-''"''\ "<,,_) Recommendations New developments in upland area should investigate infiltration of runoff as much as poss.ible. Direct discharge to stream, after tightlining down sensitive slopes, is undesirable "last choice" alternative. - Prohibit filling within 100-yr. floodplain or in wetlands. Work with landowners to fcnceg alongside stream to keep farm animals out. ':) - I k Ill 3 '1 5 6 --'- Trih. & l{ivLr Mite ~----- 0072 l,M .W 0072 RM .W 0072 RM 1.70 0072 RM 2.50 Collcc1. Point l':S( 'll.1\ l'C -- C:1tcgo1y Gcolo~y 1 lahilal Geology GcolOb')' --- Existing --,-. ' ~ Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Soos Creek meanders on a wit..lc alluvial plain. llum• mocks on valley walls and "pistol butt" tree trunks suggest colluvial creep. Num.crous springs wilh sill/ clay lithology. Dam on main slcm impounds fish for state fish hatchery. No problems ohsc1vctl. Erosional chute 6' deep emerges from rnnoff of Seattle International Road- way (SIR) parking area, Lithograph is loose, strati· ficd recessional sands. Large slide induced north of railraod right-of-way. Main stem of Soos Creek is 25' wicle with well-clevclopccl gravel bars. Terraces suggest occasional flows 2" ahovc current level. C-2 ---- Anticipated Conclitions and Problems Unstable soils anc.l wet con- ditions on· vall~y slopes. Increased flows will result in more flooding and potential hank erosion. Highlights severe erosional potential of this recessional sand unit anti impact of un- controlled runoff. None. ----,3 Rccommcndat ions Future construction should receive close study for stability and erosion potential. Develop basin plan with computer simulation of stream flows to give complete analysis in lower portion - of Soos Creek. Also include Jenkins and Covington Creeks. Recessional sand deposits in sections 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 21, and 22 of T21 N, R 5 E are highly sensitive to erosion. Require hydroloic and geotechnical reveiw for design, adequacy, an.d suitability of collection and conveyance facili- ties for all runoff from SIR, as well as existing and planned develop- ment within boundary of collection area. Require implementation and compliance if no facilities exist. None. -----,--. ' \.._/ Trih. & Collect. I ll:111 Rlv..:r Mile Point Catcgmy 6 0072 Geology RM 2.511 7 11072 (icology RM 2.tiO s 11072 1 lahitat RM 2.liO ') 01172 (icolobry RM 2.r,, I 0 11072 3 I lydrology RM 2.84- 5.85 1':S( 'IJ.;\l'C -----,,-..,, '..J Exisling Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems 5413 Main stem of Soos Creek is 2.'>' wick with well-developed gravel bars. Terraces suggest occasioanl flows 2' above currcnl level. In v1cm1ty of private foot hridgc, medium to large hank failures occur in silt/ clay-rich colluvium. Causative mechanisms include undcrculling and reduced shear strength owing to abundant springs and seepage Private landowner has placed riprap for 150' on left hank. 30" diameter CMP with erosion in recessional sands. Sec Item 6. C-3 ,,.,, ---- Anticipated Conditions and Problems None. Continued medium to large failures into creek. Fill and riprap will shift st ream onto opposite bank, resulling in increased bank erosion. Continued maintenance. Main stream will be increas- ingly strained to handle higher volume of runoff from developing areas. Dank erosion anticipated, causing hahitat dcgrada1ion, slope failures, and property damage. ----<J Recommendations None. None. Restrict filling and riprap in natural meander of floodplain. If property in danger, consider pro- tective measures along streambank suc_h as riprap. None. - New developments in upland area should investigate infiltation of runoff as much as possible. Direct- ing discharge to stream· after tightlining down sensitive slopes is undesirable "last choice" alter. native. 'J -----\ -- Trih. & Collect. 11cm H.ivl'.r Mik Poinl C,11cgo1y 11 01172 3 Geology l'.M •UO 12 ()(172 3 I lahilal l'.M 4.20 11 0072 3 Geology l(M 5.80 I~ 0072 IO 1 lydrology l(M 5.85 l':SC:B.1\1'(: ----... ,-... '0 Existing Prop. Proj. ConUitions anti Prohlcms 5419 West of confluence of Jenkins and Soos Creeks, 200' of sloughing in rccc.:ssional sands and gravels in 40'-high hank. Cause· appears to he ovcrbank discharge. Stream habitat appears to he in good com.lition on this steeper portion of the stream. Riffles common, wilh some pools. Stream· side vegetation and over- head canopy both abundant. Near bridge, stream flows through wooded wetland. Slight degree of develop- ment has not caused sig- nificant problems. South portion of Wetland 6430 and unJcsignatcd wetland at this collection point provide R/D for local and upst rc,1111 I rihutary flows. Some localizc<l hank over- topping in portions of main reach, hut innundation prohahly limited to adjm:- cnt agricultural lanJ. C-4 ---- Anticipated Conditions and Prohlcms Creek blockage and threat to property near edge of bank. None. Increased future nows could overtop existing berm struc- tures and flood adjacent agricultural lands. Arca planned to develop only moderately; significant prob- lems will probably result from upstream areas tribu- tary to this point rather than from flows generated hy runoff. ---·--() ':) Recommendations Recessional sand deposits in sections 2, 3, 10, II, 14, 15, 16, 21, and 22 or T 21 N, R 5 E are highly sensitive to erosion. Identify discharge sources and evaluate adequacy and suitability or collection and convey- ance facilities. Require compliance if none exists. None. Development detention for tributaries upstream. A basin plan should examine feasibility or directing flows from Trill. 0092 at collection point 11 into proposed R/D site at gravel pit east of 156th Pl. SE. This could provide infiltration, deten- tion, and overflow discharge directly to collection point 10. ----- 'J'rih. &._. Collect. Item H.ivcr Mik !~!l_t__ C.itcgory 1., 0072 13 ( ;colog,y l(M 7.20 I() 0072 11 (icology l(M 7.95 17 0072 13 I Iydrology Main stem RM 7.20-7.4 RM 7.95 18 0072 17 Geology RM 9.45 19 0072 17 l lydrology RM 9.55 l'::-;cn./\Pc - Prop. Proj. 5417 5408 5404 ------ L:xisting \._) ConJitions anJ Problems At 2561h crossing, wetlands anti slow flow characterize soils. /\t 244th (240th) overland out-of-hank flow is common; flout.ling. Wetlands provide R/[) for areas upstream and tribu- tary to reach. 148th Ave. SE roadway crossing wetlands in area is ovcrtoppcd during high flows due to a slight elevation of roadway. Some localized bank ovcrtopping in nonwctland portions of main reach, hut innundation limited to adjacent agri- cultural land. Minor flooding in wetland areas with dcgrm.Jalion Of portions of SE 224th. No significant problems in upland due to low level development. SE 224th St. road embankment is only approx. 2' above wetland; may he ovcrtoppcd. Periodic overlapping and innundation of h,1sc, deteriorating road- way where Trih. 0095 passes un<lcr SE 224th. C-5 --~ ---- /\nticipatcJ Comlitions and Prohlcms Overflow between SE 148th and SE 256th. None. Flooding of roadways will become· more common and greater in extent as upland areas develop. Increased flooding activity is likely with upstream development. No upland problems antici- pated as area is planned to develop very little more. Any developments in areas tributary to this subbasin will exaccrhatc flooding of SE 224th St. ----:) Recommendations Perform cost-benefit analysis for gmde raise and improved drainage. None. - Increase heigh! of roadway embank- ments to prevent continued flooding. Monitor wetlands for illegal filling and grading. Develop detention for upstream areas. Monitor areas adjacent to wetland for illegal filling and take enforce- ment action as needed for restor- ation. C) -----·..__ Trih. & Colkct. Item ltivcr Milt: Point Ca1cgo1y 20 0072 JS (jcoloc,ry l(M 111.)11 21 111172 ,.~ J lyJrology l(M lll7S 22 0072 19 I Iydrology RM 12.20 l':S( :B.A l'C --- L:'.xisling --, ...... ..._ ' ~_) Prop. Proj. Conditions and Prohlc'ms 5418 5405 Soos hcudwatcrs flow slowly through !'>mooth paslurcland. Weiland 5409 provides R/D for areas tributary to reach. Some localized hank ovt.:rlopping in main reach soulh of 2041h Way, but flooJing curn.:n1ly limited to adjacent agricultural land. Welland 5402 provides natural R/D 10 downstream system, although its func- tions have bt:cn severely degraded hy illegal filling south of and adjacent to Pctrovitsky Rd. and cast of SE I 82nd St. Some capacity prohlcms exist al undcrcrossing of Pctro- virsky Rd. C-6 ---- Anticipated Condilions and Problems None. Continued dcvclpment may cause some localized capacity problems in upland trihutary areas. Flooding south of SE 2041h Way likely to become mo~c severe until upstream regional detention sites development. Wetlands will continue to be threatened by illegal filling until effective enforcement methods arc developed. Capacity problems should be. addressed by downstream anal- ysis for new developments. County should coordinale conveyance i111provcmcn1s. -- Recommcndalions None. --('.:J ,, • '-' Moni1or areas adjacent to wetland for illegal filling and take enforce- ment action as needed for restora- tion. Legal aclions pending against illegal filling; seek to restore wetland to original slate. Possible. opportunity to create multi-use facility in - existing King County Boulevard Lake Park if need identified in future basin plan. --r '-...,· --- Trih. & ColkLI. · 111.:m ::n 14 1.5 River Mile Point 111172 RM 14.1'> 0072/\ RM 1.40 111171/\ RM .25 10 1':SCll.i\l'C c:,~ 1 ly<.lrology I labitat Geology - Prop. Proj. .5401 ----Ci Existino C.onJitions am.I Prohlcms Factors explaining lack of pro_hlcn~s in this area: I)_ this uppermost suharca has no olhcr trihuta1y areas; 2) Jcvclopmcnl is modcn1tc and many hon,cs arc situalcd on large scvcrnl- acrc parcels; 3) an exten- sive wctlan<.l (#5401) acts as effective natural R/D site, as evidenced at collection point. several severe There arc bank cuts, as well as debris Habitat for in stream. fish is poor. Drain pipe undcrculs to form erosional chute. Natural springs have down- cut 8" inlo soils C-7 --· -- /\ntidpatcd Con<.litions and Problems Recent installed sanitary sewers make it likely that area will approach its anticipated density soon. Wetland will continue to provide adequate buffer for doWnst ream system, provided ii is not degraded by. illegal filling or clearing. Channel upstream of wetland is likely to experience some capacily problems; these should he ;.u.Jdrcsscd by new developments as they occur, possibly with County coordinating a coopera- tive funding of conveyance improvements. More development at collec- tion point 2 and at Green River Community College will illcrcasc flows. Increased flows will result in more. hank erosion, scdimenl, and loss of habitat. llighlights potential for cOntinucd or increased erosion in loose colluvium -----:) Recommendations Protect and enhance wetland. A high-<.lensity multi-family development may be proposed adjacent 10 wetland due to increasing development pres- sures in area. Repair erosion of R/D pond at' upper end of tributary. Remove debris from stream. Evaluate source and establish alternate means of conveyance. -~ -1 ---C Trih. & Collect. lli.:m Rivi.:r Mik Point 2(, n 2S 29 0072,\ RM .:\0 0072/\ RM 2.10 0072ll RM .JO 01172ll IZM .7S l':S( ·u i\l'C 2 -- Category Cicology I I yd rolob'Y I labil<ll Gcolot,;1 -----0 Existing Prop. Proj. ConJitions and Prohlcms 5414 Uank failures of dcltaic deposits (ancient lake) triggered hy undercutting; response IO increased flows from streets above. Octcnlion facility for Rainier Ridge single-family plat .appeared to l,c functioning, although one section of berm h..id eroded severely and ncct.Js repair and armor. Pipe directing roa<lsiJc runoff from north side of SE 320th has foiled, and runoff has cut ditch through vege- tation to cast, causing significant slope failure on right bank of tributary. Culvert under railroad is a fish blockage. S1nall ephemeral stream undergoing some bank erosion due to incrcasc<l peak flows. Silt/day lithology exposed in hank. C-8 ---- An1icipa1cd Condilions and Prohlems J ncrcasc<l erosion of banks nnJ Jctcrionuion of habitat. If not corrccled, problem will deeply incise swale bank and lransport an unacceptable volume of malcrial to stream below. Increased nmoff from area soon to he developed will aggravate slope failures obsC,vcd. Reach is of par- ticular concern due to ·adverse impacts on stale fish hatchery immediately downstream. Incrci.lscd stream downcutling. and resulting hank erosion, sidCculling, and sedimenta- tion downstream will occur. None. ----0 '.:) Rccommendalions Intercept source flows. in street areas and direct to storm sewers or suitable facilities. Construct delention facilily here and direct runoff from SE 3121h St. to lhis location. Analysis and design of facility should calibrate existing detention facilities and construct retrofitting control features to allow all facilities in the subbasin to work as a complete system. Place strict onsite controls on any future development tributary to this drainage, since no area exists £or regional R/D. None. - --I '--- Trih. & Colkt:t. Item River Milt.; Poinr ::HJ :; I .12 :n 3.J 0072C RM . JO 00721) RM .JO 007.1 l(M . .10-.'!0 ()[)7'\ IZM .3:i 01173 RM RM .90 I' :SCIJ.1\ 1 'C: -- Catcg.01y I lahitat I lahitat I lahital (.icology ( icolOb,')' -----0 Exi:-;ling Prop. Proj. Conditions anJ Problems Small, class 5 stream; poor fish habitat Jue to .small size. Strca1nsi<lc vegetation anti overhead canopy in good conJition. Severe erosion, hank fail· urcs, slides, and sediment exist. There arc ironfixing hactcria from debris. Out- fall from SIR parking lot flows into this tributary. I lahitat in good condition. Nice pools amJ riffles. some Jchris dams hut no fish .hlm;kagcs. Stream is fairly high, muddy and silty. Overhead trees abundant, as is strcamsidc vegetation. JOO-to 200-yr.-old debris flow with recognizable. fan morphology emerges from narrow draw. May have been triggcrcU hy logging before turn of cenlu1y. Silt exposcU in slope failure inJuccJ hy u nUc rcut I ing. C-9 --- Anticipated Con~ilions anc.J Problems E.rosion anc.J downstream seUimcntation inevitable if development occurs. - There will be more movement of large amounts of earth. Muddy waters on rainy day show erosional problems upstream from collection point 5. ----8 Recommcnc.Jations Establish nonerosive stormwater release rntcs and volumes for future development. Establish onsite control for SIR stonnwatcr. Retain natural stream corridor. Enforce erosion control require- ments for new development. - Unstable for constn1ction. Risky. Monitor during permit review process. Conlinucd hank recession, c.JcgraJing of spawning encironmcnt. Evaluate total system flows and, ir prudent, develop alternatives to instream discharge of runoff from developments. C) ---(--Trih. & Colkct. Item Eivcr Mile Poinl 35 J<, -' 7 :rn :-;1; -11) 007.1 l<M .'l:i Oll71 l(M 1.00 1)(17.1 007.1 !Uvl 1.W 0071 l(M 1.(,0 01)73 IUA 21.S l':SCU.t\l'C ) ) ) 7 -- Ca1cgo1y (icology (.icology I lyc!rology (jcolob'Y I lahi1a1 (icolo~y -----,..;.... u Existing l'rop. Proj. Conditions anJ Prohlcms Sill exposecl in slope failure induced hy undercutting. Liller ancl clehris blocks stream channel. J\ccclcrntcd hank erosion of rnain channel due to increased runoff upstream. Trih. 0073U experiencing serious instability near confluence with main stem due 10 developmenl. (See geologic appenclix_) Confluence with tributary; erosional cuts suggest recent flood raisi;J stream 3' above existing flows. llahitat in good condition. Sill in suspension; live- stock have access to stream. Gentle (20%) side slopes in pastun.:lanJ. No evidence of erosion, hut float.Jing reported. C-10 --- Anticipated . Conclitions and Problems Continued hank recession, degradation of spawning environment. Periodic breakout could trigger nooding. - As ·area above Trib. 0073 develops, erosion of. swale Iha! conveys ii will cxperi, cncc increasing capacity problems. Increase erosion will occur as stream attempts to seek new cq·uilibrium capacity. None. Dank erosion will occur from presence of livestock. Slight increase in high flows proportional to dcvclopemnl u psi rc.i 111. ----8 Recommendations · Evaluate total system flows and, if prudent, develop alternatives - to instream discharge of runoff from developments. Clean out and restore to natural condition. Future developments above Trib. 0073D should use infiltrative capacity of soils in the area as feasible to reduce runoff. Developments adjacent to main stream channel should provicle adequate setbacks from slopes 10 prevent slope failure. None. Plant some trees in floodplain. corridor section. Put in some drop structures to create pools. None. - Item -l I :12 4.1 4-l 45 -l/) -- \ --Trib. & llivt:r Mile Oll71 IUvl 2.15- 1.50 111171 ltM 2.55 0071 llM 2.811 0071 IUvl 2.<J5 0071 RM 1.15- 1.(,5 0071 IZM :U-1 l':SCIU\l'C --- Col kcl. l'oinl <:aicgorv 7 l lyllrology 7 (jcology 7 Geology 7 Geology 9 l lytlrology 7 (icolcwv b, --- l..:xisting --·-· ' l \._., Prop. Proj. ConUi1ions and Problems 5402 Undclcnnincd source produc- ing substantial suspended loatl of sill in tributary. Slrcam adequately accommo- dating incrcascll runoff from upstream Ucvclopmcnt. Strca1n crossing with n1noff of 5-10 cfs. Evitlcnce of short-tluration flooding. Evidence for sidcculling 611 above existing flows. On till soils, 60'-widc flootl plains IS above cxisling flows with evidence for <H.lditional IS tlcpth. Extensive existing Wetland 5450 is currently providing R/1) buffering the flow before it passes into channel through King County l lol1sing Authority develop- ment. In housing development, erosion ·,1rounU c.:ulvcrt cnfrancc 2' above existing fl<w .. ·:,;. C-11 ---- i\nticipatctl Conditions and Prohlcms Localized capacity problems will become more evident as area develops. Slight flooding. Widening and undercutting of In.mks in response to added flows. None. Provides good index for evaluation of system. Filling may occur in area along north honJcr of wetland lo increase amount of potential commercial real estate. Subarca development may cause localized .capacity problems in lower reaches. Continued erosion around !'ii nu:I u re. -----:) Recommendations No regional facility proposed· for this tributary due to lack of obvious location, but basin plan may justify one. Maintain distance from 25-yr. flood- plain using 3' above existing flows as minimum guideline. None. None. Monitor wetland for filling; take action to obtain restoration if this occurs. Enforce wetland protection regulations. Provitle some armoring as bank protec- tion (riprap). ·') ----- ~ Trih. & Collccl. lll'.111 Riv~~1ik Poi!!!__ Catcg.rny ,17 .JX 41) 511 51 (107] J(M -'·-'·' (1(17] RM 3.W- . J.711 (1()7] J(M -IA 0071 RM ~.75 1107,U J(M .10-..10 1':S( :J l.i\ l'C 7 ( icology <) I bbitat 9 Cicology 12 1 ly<lrology 5 1 labitat --- Existing --;...-. __ I ' \_, Prop. Proj. ConJitions anJ Prohkms 5406 Pei.II ovcrlics till in wctl;.1nJ area. I ns1 ream hahitat 1s poor Jue to lack of overhead canopy anJ strcmnbnnk vegetation in some areas. Livestock have access to stream; hanks have been croJcU in some areas. Stream occupies swalc in rolling terrace. No erosional stress. No significant problems. Poor fish habitat. Small stream with bank erosion and <1ssociatcJ pasture with livestock. C-12 ---- Anticipated Conditions and Problems None. More flooding with increased strcamhcd and bank erosion will occur . None Arca planned for only slight additional dcvelopn1ent. No problems anticipated. Increased bank erosion will occur. -----~ -......., Recommendations None. Establish more restrictive controls on volumes and rates of release for developments. Work with landowner to provide fencing and natural vegetative buffer along stream. None. Future basin plan should consider Wetland 5444 for detention facility to assist in alleviating downstream capacity problems. Establish nonerosive stormwater release rates and volumes for future developments. ----· Trih. & Colkct. li..:111 River Mik Point --·------ 52 007:! 1,4 I( M .:10-'.iO .'.)J )-1 1107 4 IZM .50 11074 l(M J,O I'S( 'll.i\l'(: 4 ----- L:xisting --,-, , I ,.._,, Catcgorv Prop. Proj. ConJitions anJ Problems 1 lyurology 5415 Mostly unucvclopcu; high percentage of open ficlUs and pastures. Uank erosion along west side of SE 312th Way thn.:atcns integrity l lahitat l lahitat of roaJway. llahital <lownstrcam of SE 312th Way. Culvert is improveu from RM .50 but only marginally. Lots of dchris in stream. I Iillsiuc anu roau sliuing into stream at USGS stream gauge at RM .10. I labilat poor for fish <luc 10 debris, road, and erosion problems. C-13 --- J\nticipalcu Conditions and Problems Future Jcvclopmcnt offers opportunity lo construct regional ~ctcntion facility, - as um.lcvclopcd area consists of several large, contiguous parcels. Uank undcrculling will accclcratc 1 causing failure of roauway ;olong 1000' of SE 312th Way if only normal detention requirements met. I ncrcascd ninoff from suhhasin now Jcveloping will aggravate slop_c failures anJ adversely impact st;otc fish hatchery downstrcnm. I ncreascu flows may cause scour and bank erosion. Dank erosion, sedimentation and roaJ failure exist. This will be a big problem with increased flows in future. -----·:J Recommendations Construct proposed tightline project to prcvt:nl failure of road embankment and transportation of material to sensitive main creek reaches. Clean out debris. Provide R/D as needed at top of ravine. Armor stream bank and reinforce road. ') ----- ~ Trih. & Colh.:iet. Item )liver Mile Point -·--------Ct1tcgory )) )() 57 'iX 007) l(M .11- 1. .J II OOX I l(M . JO OOX I l~M .<,l OOX I RM .62 l':SCU.1\ 1 'C: <, 1 lyl.lrolog;y ') I lahitat ') (icolobry 9 I lahilal -----.-. \._/ Existing Prop. Proj. ConJitions and Problems Due to relatively slight degree of dcvdopmcnt, thcrc do not appcar to he any significant prohlcms ,11 this time. No m<.1jor problems other than lack of ovcrhcmJ canopy from Joss of trees, vegeta- tion. Culver! 2.5' X 2.5' passes under road. I rridcsccnt hydrocarbon sheen noted on surface. Some minor side- hank scour noted. Stream has hccn ditched l11rough· pasture. Dirt banks exposed wilh few or no trees to shade stream. C-14 ---- Anticipated Condi1ions and Problems No prohlcms anticipated as area is planned to develop O!lly slightly. None. Increased flows will have minor increase in soil erosion. Dank erosion will occur. ----8 Recommendations None. Maintain stream corridor and buffer. Encourage owner to fence stream from animals. Identify hydrocarbon· source and test to evaluate pollutants. Would be beneficial to isolate livestock from sidebank areas and establish vegetation on banks· for erosion control and filtration. Revegetate strcamsides. - Encourage owner to fence off stream from livestock. - lll:Jll )!) !,() ,; I - Trih. & River Mik (I( )')I RM 110 Oll'l I I\ RM .17- 2.45 llll'J I I\ RM .20 l':S< :U.i\l'C --- ( 'olkct. Point < ~atcgorv 8 1 lyJrology 13 I lyJrology n l l.1bitat -----.'--.._/' Existing Prop. J>roj. Condilions ,ind Prohlcms 54 IO I .. akc Meridian area nearly entirely JevelopeJ with single-family resiliences. 5409 I .. akc acts as subregional receiving body is effec- tively .hul'fcring runoff to downstream reaches. Some potential for flooding of mobile home park down- stream of lake <luc to possible limilcd c.apacily in pipe Jischarging from onsitc pond. Development is causing in- creased capacity problems and resulting increased volume of runoff, acccler- ting erosion of stream channel in subdivisions near golf course. Altered portion of stream due to· road cons1n1ction. All riffles with few or no pools. i\h..lcr shat.Jes stream well. C-15 _ ....... , ---- Anticipated Conditions and l'rohlems Arca 1rihu1ary lo lake is nearly completely developed, so Ii Ille change is anlici·. pated for system. Arca south- east or lake has yet lo fully develop and potential exists for localized conveyance capacity prohlems that should he addressed hy downstream analysis for new developments. Capacity problems will increase as upstream areas arc Jcveloped. Future problems only likely 10 be scouring of smaller rock during peak flows, Jue to import of rock -----.·:) Recommendations Dasin plan should consider modirication of L1ke Meridian outlet to provide considerably more deten- tion with very minimal alteration of lake levels. This could substan- tially reduce future capacity problems immediately downstream. Construct berm and control structure at outlet to Clark Lake lo possibly "detain" runoff and help. reduce flow downstream. 1£ a high-density multi-family project is propsed near lake,· as is likely, ·there would be opportunity lo develop berm and control measures. Addres.s capacity problems at Clark Lake by channel armoring or upsizing pipe. Placement of some larger rocks to create pools and eddies. 0 ----- Trih. & Cullccl. ltcm ~ivc1~D_~ ~-111__ C,11t:gorv <,2 ( ,:, 1,-1 ,;:-; ()() Oll•J I i\ 1Ztv1 .:,tJ ()()<)11\ RM 1.20- :2.10 00') I B RM .1,2 ()()<)2 RM .IO ()()<J2 1Uv1 .:10 l':SCIJ.i\ PC 1.1 I lahitat u I lahital 15 I1ydrolo6'Y .1 CiL:ology .1 Cicology --- Existing ---- ''---"' l'rop. Proj. Conditions anc.J Prohlcrns 5407 Stream has hccn ditched and most strca1nsidc vegetation removed through golf course. Some hank erosion occurring. Very little overhead vege- tation alongside stream. (iooJ strcamsidc vegetative cover cx<.:cpt through shopping center. Overhead canopy varies by property. Modc1:atc amount of current development. Wetland 5240 proviJes R/D, protecting Uownstrca1n channel from increased volume of runoff as area develops. No sig- nificant problems in nrca. Little Soos Creek near north margin of Covington Channel. No reportcJ or observed flow or erosion problems . Dchris and bank erosion founJ. C-16 --- l\nticipatcJ Condilions and Prohlcms More bi.Ink erosion anJ scJimcntation of channel cxpcctcJ. - There will he additional loss of nativ.c vegetation along~ siJe stream. More floodi.ng anJ erosion will occur. Localized capacity problems may occur in upland tributary as areas develop. Wetland, i[ preserved, will continue lo proviJe R/D for increascJ flow generated hy new dcvclop- mCnts. None. Increased bank erosion is expected. -- Recommendations --(~ ':) Stabilize bank anJ shade stream by planling native vcgctalion. - Enhance use of Clark Lake as R/D facility to reduce peak flows. Further restrict storntwatcr rare and volume rcalcasc rates. Protect and possibly enhance wetland as upper area develops. None. Reduce storm flows by use of stricter stormwater controls, new R/D facili- ties, anJ fencing of stream. increased flows. -----Trill. S Collect. It C Ill l{ivcr l\;l1H.: Poinl --------------··----~ ( :atcgory 1,7 (i;-{ (,l) 70 71 ()()>)2 l(M .l'i-l.1,•J ()(J>J2 RM .fi5 ()()')2 l(M 1.(,11 ()(J')2 RM 1.70 ()1)')2 l<M 170- :U,'i l':SC :ll.1\ I'(: 11 I lyclrolo~y 11 1 lahitat 11 I lahitat I~ Geology 1; 11 yd rology - Prop. Proj. 'i~ Ir, -----L:xis1 ing ~ (.'onditions ant.I Prohlcms'-" I .illk Soos Creek tributary has been containcJ and mani- curcJ as it passes through plats. This has rc<lm:c<l capacity of stream in key an.:as where resultant channel _ovcrtopping causes flooJing of some homes semi- yearly. Instrcam habitat is good. Stream corridor mostly in good condition. M;,micurcd lawns run down to stream in places. Some tlchris found in stream. I lahilal generally good. Meandering segment of Lillie Soos; possihk: colluvial creep in adjacent sidchank areas. I .ittle current development. No significant prohlems other than some localized hank ovcrtopping in portions of main reach. Innundation will likely he limited 10 adjacent agricultural land. C-17 ----J\ntidpatcJ ConJi1ions and Problems i\s development continues, existing capacity problems wilJ he further aggravated by incrcasc<l volume of runoff, which previously was iihlc to enter groundwater system. directly. Increased flows will cause flooding and erosion. Dank erosion, flooding, and sedimema1ion likely to occur. 1'01en1ially unstable banks wOulJ affect construction. As area develops, channel capacity problems will become more evident and increased erosion will occur as stream attcmps to seek new cqui- iihrium capacity. · -- Recommendations --"'""''I J No apparent suitable ·sites for - regional detention facilities to help reduce flow entering problem reaches. Acldress increased runoff volumes from new developments with infiltration systems where feasible. Channel capacity enhancement projects (such as Project 5416) should be constructed to prevent further property damage. Uasin plan shoulJ° address potential of detaining runoff from upstream tributary area to allow for increased flows. Establish undisturbed stream buffers. Stricter control on R/D release rates and volumes should be established. Maintain natural buffer along most of channel. If construction were considered, recommend evaluation of soils and stability of sites. Future developments should utilize infiltrative capacity. of soils to reduce increased runoff volumes. Provide adequate flooding pro1ec1ion for future runoff con- ditions. ·8 - f IC 111 70 n 7.1 7.1 7r, 77 78 7') --,,.- \ Trih. &"--' Colkct. IZivcr Mik 1'oin1 ------ ()()')2 l(M 2.,~11 ()()')2 l(M 2 .. ~11 00'>2 IZM 3.3:i ()()1)2 l(M } . .JO (11)•)2 RM 3 .JO ()(192 RM 3.6:i· 4. 7:i 1)(1')2 1,M .J.oo. 4.40 Ill I'> 2 1Uv1 -L<i.'i 1.1 I .J I<, I(, 16 16 16 16 1':SCIJ.1\l't: --·- Ca1cgo1y Prop. Proj. (it.:ology 11.ihitat Geology l lahitat Geology 1 lyurology 5412 I lahitat Gcolo1:,ry .. --- Existing 0 Condi I ions nnd Problems Potential for flooding in low arc.as; vc1y low sidc- slopcs. Some dchris found. Ovcrhank flows. 1.ots of sand in hcdload. Stream.Sith.: buffer generally good. Resident reports trees down in stream and sidcbank erosion evident. Little current uevclopment. some localized bank over- topping in portions of main reach hut innundation is probably limited lo adjacent agricultural land. Stream uitchcd. Little strcamsidc vegetation and no overhead canopy. Some livestock-related erosion and runoff. Orange iron precipitate noted in strcambcd near outh.:t to I .akc Youngs. C-18 ---- Anticipated Conditions and Problems Possible flooding (minor). Dank erosion and scdi~cnta-. tion likely. Possible flooding (minor). More sedimentation likely, as well as bank erosion ,rnd floouing. Some continued erosion. No problems anticipated as VCI)' lillle additional development is planned for this area. Uank erosion and flooding of now "improved" pasture will occur. Some localized o,,,gen depiction of fish habitat. ----q -'-" Rccommcnda1ions Consider upstream dc1ention. Establish stricter control on R/D release rates and volumes. Maintain natural buffer along most of channel. Consider upstream detention. Establish stricter control on R/D release rates and volumes. Maintain natural buffer along most of channel. Some clean-out of trees and limited armoring of banks would be beneficial. Consider Wetland 5480 for a detention site, in a future basin plan, in order to alleviate down• stream capacity problems. Work with land owner to fence off stream. Plant native vegetation buffer. Natural deposition as iron is exchanged for o,,,gen. -!!!!!I ---·-.---· - ' "- Trih. & Collect. .. - Existing --\,,.-..., '-_.) --· -- J\nlicipatcd !!~!!! l{ivcr Mik Point Catcgo1y Prop. Proj. ConJitions anJ Prohlcans ConJitions and Problems· go QQ.'!2 J(, I lahilal l(M 4.r,_, 81 1111•n I~ I lahitat RM .011-.87 82 001n I •I ( icology RM O.:t."l ,'):, 1111'1-I 13 ( icolog:y RM 11.W 81 011•1.1 13 I lahital l(M .(J.:lll K) (11)•).j 13 l lahital l<M 1.00 X<i 1111').f I~ 1 labital I{ rvl (',() 1':SU!.1\l'C J ron.fix.ing bacteria ,rn<l None. assoda1ct.l odor present. Source unknown. (_,akc Youngs release rate is minimum 2 cf. Very small lrihulary wilh undefined drnn11cl in places. J lahitat value for fish is low. Poorly defined stream chai111t.:i' with no cviJcncc o( erosion. Minor sidchank erosion hclow convergence of two culvert/creeks. Strcamsidc vegetation hus hecn n.:movcd by logging. I mpor1an1: This is a salmon spawning st ream. Some bank erosion prohably <lue lo live- stock. There is riverine wetland just cast of 156th Ave SE C-19 Erosion and flooding from fu1ure dcvclopmenl likely. None. Sligh! enlargement of erosional features. There is a pos.sibility of · bank erosion due to increased flows from development. More bank erosion will occur. None. -----·:) Recommendations None. Reduce storm flows by use of stricter s1om1water controls, new R/D focililies, and fencing of stream. None. Local armoring/riprap applied by owners would reduce impacls. Provide stormwater control Establish ·stream corridor buffer. Improve stormwater control. Encourage property owners to fence stream. Provide stream corridor buffer. Improve s1ormwater. control. Maintain wetlands and stream. corridor in natural s1a1c. r:J - I 1 cm K7 .~K :·N !)(} 'ii .. , \ "-' Trih. & l{ivi..:r Mile ()()<)_\ l{M .:1)-.. ~S ()()<)_\/\ J,M 00-2K (J(J<J_\i\ Rrvt .<i5 (J()<J7 RM .:15 011')7 l(M .:1.\ 1•:.,< ·u Al'<: l!!!I!! --- Colkct. Point <:at c b.2.tY 17 l lahitat JS I lahitat 18 1 lahitat IK ( icolo1=,ry 18 1 lahitat -!II!!!! 1!1!!111 ---0 Existing Prop. Proj. ConUitions and Problems Small, ephemeral stream flowing through pasture. Livestock causing hank erosion. DitchcJ area; lots of debris. Debris exists in salmon spawning an.:a. Stream flowing through 1..kvclopmcnt shows minor hcd and hank erosion as stream cquilihrntcs to new channel. Debris and fill in wetland. C-20 --- Anticipated ComJitions and Prohlcms None. Continued filling may occur in flood plain. - This will have minimal effect on habitat. Continuing adjustment will ocCur until sys1cm establishes a mature, developed· water· course. More filling may occur. -- Rccommcm.lations -()- ·::J Encourage property owner to fence stream. Maintain stream corridor. Enforce grading and filling ordinance. Maintain slrcam corridor in natural condilion. - The key word is "equilibrates." Disturbance of the nalural system has inilialcd or induced readjustment in lhe bed as a function of new gradients, malerials, and 01her hydraulic factors. In time, the stream will eslablish itself in another "natural" equilibrium, assuming no new variables such as added flows or alleration of channel geometry are inlroducc_d. Enforce grading and filling ordinance. I I 0 I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I : I ( ) l _ - . I I: EXHIBITD I· I<<. I;:; . , .... · .. ,t_;, .,· I:··. ·• ·- 1 .. ··•·• ·.-·.; . ... .. ·. 1:-: •. ·••·· Ii : . ;. •· ''' •-·· '{jj(\C:J\,::i·(?f:-:' {)?:_<·:. · · · '· ', · '. ·, , · ·. {/ ,')}'(l;i \ " . :,_· ·Jsranier N~yt~w:~stJ~t: <": ,;_._· .. .. ,:)··~'.,, }: ,_, .. ,J . . . .survey.brs .Lf>lru.\n~rs ".Engi1i~e.1;_s., • • ' . ' .;. " . :,. ~ .. . ,, - . <)/-._-·< •! - .. :<!-·~· : . :~ . "/ ·. ' , .... '' . ,,' ; {iii\Ji;Ji ·:>/·~---' .~ -', . . ,-,.; -, I I () I . I I I I I I If~) I I I I I I I I\ I I. TASK1 II. TASK 2 Ill. TASK 3 IV. TASK 4 V. TASK 5 APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS RESOURCE REVIEW FIELD INSPECTION DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT; PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS I I In. I I I I TASK1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS I I I 1) I I I I I I I I ! ) I I I I I I I I I {) I I(-) I I I I I I I I I , _ _,,. TASK1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION This project is located at 11634 SE 192nd Street in Renton, Washington. It lies along the north side of SE 192nd Street and is approximately 2.25 acres. The property will be divided into nine residentiaflots. All lots will gain access from SE 192nd Street via a new sub-access street. . There is an existing house, three driveways, a concrete pad and two sheds located in the southwest portion of the property, while the rest of the property portion consists mainly of grass, some brush and some trees. The existing site drainage sheet flows from the west to the east. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. MAPS A vicinity map, sensitive areas map, aerial/topo map, and offsite drainage map .can be found in the proceeding pages. I I . {) I I I I I I I le~) I I I I I I I I I h-'--..i:::-t--t---a ~ ~BZ dSt f; SE ~ B!!th. St SE 188th St Ii 96th St RA THINAM SENSITIVE AREAS _J 89lllj ! ,-·=---f' , .... , ' ~/ ' -~--' ·,~.:8lc> .~(1~ '::!::~;;.;.""'r"--~:-:::::r: I I -.. -~ ' 7 ' 61""4002"5 ,' ! I -! · 6198dtf'0&5.~1 · r·········-r·--·-, I 61~"040 r:ll0060---r . 8 om,d_ 51 J, 98400242 I . ., . •P"""'°""!" 81-~----llllk.Al/lUE_j__ · ·~1-------·j r·-.. ·--......... ,'990000SC) 5E..1119'1JJ.L" ,-·--..... , ............ , ________ -· . ! I [ I ' I 1119&4002<l0 I ··-· ' ,\~_5\lsto 61M4000i80 ' . l : f.----_________ ---~--------+ ---------------··------·-------------i ~~~;;r-·----~r-· •I I ~ 1---, ", I .i e, ... ioo,oo I 5'""' , i "'""°""' wt+ ;---~r----~~02:!lo %~0 3 1' _ ------.,c.J------·----· --·11.'l :-----,,-----I ;r;' '~ i"'_., _____ -• ... i I ~ ' 6199000142· t; , • , .... LL 61""'00300 1<11 f= , , ;:: 1i' i ., ... ,oo,25 "'~120 _______ (: . __ L . -f •• ___ _ t:36 ~. ; -----... _____ ..... __ -1t1 , · ---~ ..-·----; ~ . - -:; f-----·-----r -~-··-------I !~ I 6f!~143 90T.H_LH_! 1•!,,...0/lt~L.. ..,,a,<X>140 i 6100400:!20 ,i 1~90000140 11 , 6 1"64001,, I .. _ ............. -.,--------,-----.. -, · ,.,~,o (~~i i...J..~.!Ali r_~---rl 1~1-------'-, .•..... J.~ __ ) l • 1 l \ Ol{l,8,400162 :' -·-----; I i. . ., -! ! i 6100.00161 6198400180 51911400300 ~""""°::;'i'~ /--·-···--,·----f . ! 9&4Q01sd : ! 322300!>1E!il i 6\~184 ij l99!!001eo . I . . -__, L. ' 61 . .t::"Ma-I"'"• :'.l. 9!_~0-sy.---- --l ' ' ! ---·---, -·--- i ~ ---i-:~,~l ,L--}~.~ ~t' ,) 1moomo ! ' : i ...... 42 ,-••7,;.,,.-,20---' ! . [ __ .. -----, ,----~ ~"" C-, , 79,M"¥9 ~ ~-,t I~. I 1. ~r~~.~ L ~;-T!,t'.1-1 ~~t--~r--' , 1~ J--· --------~. ~~ff;?~t r~~ ! l ' ~ , ' -· ... 1nAo!~~iiiiiioil10 .i~.. ': · r=::1.rk.i. ·'1.o~f .1~~. -·,;.;T~. :~. I I , ~Q.Al<rrri\200 --··--·-····-·····-, 1 ----...... J... __ ..... -----· ·1 , koo.o1~ I i 00221>!i0065 I ! 1932()()()004 I R>WwlS '.tci-""'eC..riJ / ' . 1932.0CQ'J 1 '!! 0 ;,I Seleeled Feature, Legend ~ FIOodway ;,/ Sb<lets lsEI 100 Y•at FloOdplaln r·· ...... Peroat L_J ffl SAO WGU.nd SAO Stream ~ SAO Land:dde ;/ .,_, ffl SAO Coal Mine ;v' °""'-~ SAO SelSITlk: _;,/ Cte-.. 2 s.no,,w.:1 SAO E,oa.ot'I _r. •. ..-C.=3 Landslide Ha:t:atd Orainaga A.tea \J~ LakM and Large~ ·r ' -,. -·--- a "'.._ Ill ._. -----~ \._, - j61~161 61990C.'<)1S0 l_ j __ .L. ... --·--. _ _t__ . - ,-r----··r\ i2ooooa,, 2ll17~ I l f ·-._ ·~1 !---C ,L_';·,/ l ·1 2817~ ~~ 2817t;.,/ f-~ /-\- 1 ZS.17&:)()310 I r-·· .... )-.- 2lll1'1(X'al() i· __ .. -''\·· 2&~1~ .·· --------.---.,---~ - ~O.O!IJml~ -iiiiill ilii lllllll ----- --------------------C - r--, - ·--I ·rt-- I 16~ I I· l.1 I I I I I I I f'-·: 8 11 TR~ I If 0 I ,, I lo 1. (2) : "' I 2 11' :zoo fl offs=+~ D,-.;t\ A,,1 ~ t't"'-f I :n I I I I I I IC) I I II I I I I I ( ) I TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW Adopted Basin Plans and Finalized Drainage Studies: The site is located inside the Soos Creek Basin Plan. Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports: No known reports are known to exist. Critical Drainage Area Maps: The site is not known to be located in any critical drainage areas. (FEMA) Maps: The site is located outside the 100 year flood plain. Other Offsite Analysis Reports: None were available Sensitive Areas Folio: None of the site is located in or near any sensitive area (see sensitive areas map under Task 1 ). · · DNR Drainage Problems Maps: Not applicable. Road Drainage Problems: Not applicable. King County Soils Survey: Soils on this site consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 0 to 6 percent slope (AgB). Wetlands Inventory Maps: There are no wetlands located on or near the site. Migrating River Studies: Not applicable. Drainage Complaints: According to the list of drainage complaints provided by King County, there were no complaints near the downstream analysis limits of this project that are a direct result of runoff from this property. Most of the drainage complaints have been resolved. However there were several drainage complaints from property owners on the south side of SE 196th Street, east of 1201 h Ave SE. It appears that most of their runoff problems are a result of development runoff I •n I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I FEB. 3.2004 12:03PM KC NLRD -N0.305 P.l/7 King County Water afud Land Resources (WLR) Division 20 I S Jackson St, Suite 600 S~attle, WA 98104-3855 FAX To:~r7~1~ -~Ji/JU Fax: (%0)9'~-7V/ Phone: (};;{;g) ~ r A:? I \I Ii Date: Number of pages including cover sheet: _,7..__ From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stonnwater Services Section Phone: [lQQ) 296-1900 Fax Number: (2Qfil 296-0192 RE: Level 1 An alvsis i' · . . To follow is a list of compla111ts received by the Water and Land Resources Division Drainage Services Section. Complaint numbett beginning prior to 1990.XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can st I be retrieved, if necessary, but.will take additional time and may-not be · beneficial to your re~earch ~ e to their age, development which has occurred, ew ... If you are intere~ted · . in reviewing the actual com~laints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can -be, obtained for$ .15 per page, ~d $2,00 per page for plans, · Keys: Typp of lnvcstlgatjpo C Action Request : BCW Butlnoss' for Clean ~awr CCP Rtsponso to Inquiry! •cL Clain, : EM Entbroement on H~I ER l3nfbrcomont Revi FCC,FCR,FCS Facility Complalnl> ' Pl SWM Feo Inquiry ' FIR SWM Pee Revi~ ffil SWM Fee on Hold 1 ' •ts Law.uit ~ RR Facility Engine.nos ovlew · NDA Neighborhood Dtoin Misi.nce WQC Wattr Quality Complain, WQE Wa1er Quality Enlbr~ont WQR Wat.er Quality Engln~ring Rcviaw WQA Wam Quality Audit Ii . WQO WataQw,Jity-Othe1 . Sl,S2,SNl Entlnoerlng Studies I ' Tyne of prgbfom . DCA DDM DES DLE DTA INQ MMA MMF MMO MMM MNM MNW SWF WQB WQD WQI REM <lllT NWD Dw~opment/Con,truellon Drainage -MiscolJaneou, Drainage-Eto,ion/Sodiment4tion , Oralt1tlGe ... L11nd:dlde/BArth Movement Drorne.ge T;chnicll As1i&tancc Dndnngo-Ocn"1I Jnqul,y Molni.nanee • Ae,thctic, Moinknancc • Floodins: Maintenance .. Oencral Mairitmanc~ ... Mowing ,Moi~nanCO-Need,_~aintenMOC Malni.nan~-Noxlow Weed, SWM Fee QQ~lions, : :. ~ Wotcr QucJl/y-Be,t M,nagemen, "'1clfm Water Quclity-Dumplng Waler Quality-Ollc:h Conn:Otlon SWM Pee RRc:moasuremtnt SWM Pe<-OtM! SWM Fet•Ntw Disooum . •Subject to Public Disclosuro roqutrcmenul\. Rocelpt ofwrittcmn:quas< for docwncntl 2. Review Md llj)provcl by ProsO«Jtlng ,._ttom<)"J offioe I FEB. 3.2004 12:04PM KC WLRD N0.306 · P.2/7 I .· () wno county Watsr and Land RBBDurcBB Division • Dratnaoe Services semlon · I . Complaint Search Prtnted : 2/3/2004 9:42:42 AM . . I GmnPIBlnt · TYPI TYPB or Problem Number COIID Addruu or Problem comments lbroa P11111 1975-0076 C FLOG RD WY/FLO'D/112TH AVE SEISE 186TH ST 686E2 I 1975-0149 C EROSION 12227 SE 208TH ST GALEN CARIN #1 686F4 1977,0003 C DRNG 12207 SE 192ND ST @ GOLDEN HILLS 686F3 1978-0028 C DRNG 20205 10GTHAVE SE 686E3 I 1978-0085 C FLOG 20921 . 120TH AVE SE BACKYARD . 686F4 1979-0047 C 11403 SE204TH ST SOIL BULLDOZED/PANTHER LK AREA 686E2 1981,0081 C DRNG 19917 122ND PL SE BLOCKED/EAST HILL AREA 686F3 I 1981.0215 C DRNG 19918 122NO PL SE C/B CAVING IN 686F3 1981-0320 C FLOG 20921 120TH AVE SE PANTHER LK AREA 686F4 I 1983.()194 C DRNG 108TH AVE SE 686E3 1983·019S C · 10860 SE 196TH FILLING & GRADING 686E3 1983-0424 X DRNG 12528 SE202ND PL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 686F3 I 1984-0091 C DRNG 20856 120TH AVE SE DITCH FILLING 686F4 1984-0095 C FLOG 20204 106TH AVE SE 686E3 1984-0324 C DRNG SE 204TH ST/124TH AVE 686F3 I ()986-0377 E DRNG 12002 SE 208TH ST VL TR CRTD PROB. BLOCKED DRIVEWAY 686F4 ~· 986-0702 C DRNG 12240 SE 200TH ST MAINTENANCE OF LOT 686F3 1986-1166 C FLOG 11202 se 186TH ST STORM OVERFLOW · 6BBE2 I 1986-1185 C FLOG 11202 SE 186TH ST SEE: 86·1166 BRYANT, BILL 686E2 1986-1190 C FLDG 11001 SE 186TH ST BASEMENT GETIING WATER 68BE2 I 1987-0246 C FLOG 20238 127TH PL SE WATER FROM NEIGHBORS 87-0918 6861'3 1987..0334 C DRNG 11202 SE 186TH ST CULVERTS BLOCKED 86-1166, 1185 686E2 1987-0471 C FLDG 11202 SE 186TH ST SPRING GLEN 86-1166, 1185 686E2 I 1987-0545 C DRNG 18627 109TH AVE SE INADEQUATE SYSTEM 686E2 1987-0675 C DITCH 19407 124TH AVE SE DRAINAGE DITCH ON PROPERrt 686F3 1087-0918 C DRNG 20236 127TH PL SE WATER UNDER HOUSE 87-0246 686F4 I 1988-0551 C DRNG 20002 124TH AVE SE FILL IN WETLANDS 686F3 1089-0019 C DRNG 19400 124TH AVE SE DITCH MAINTENANCE 686F3 I 1089-0328 C DRNG 12202 SE 204TH ST BUILDER OF NEW HOME IMPORTED FILL 686F4 1989-0410 C DRNG 12213 SE 199TH ST PONDING IN DRAINAGE EASEMENT 686F3 1989-0564 C DRNG 12225 SE 204TH ST EROSION OF YARDS IN NEW PLAT . 6B6F4 I 1989-0560 C DRNG 20508 123RD PL SE DOWNSPOUTS ERODING YARD 89-0564 666F4 1989·0564 C EROSION 20508 123RD PL SE NEW HOME DOWNSPOUTS OPEN 686F4 1989-0650 C DRNG 18631 111TH PL SE SM/ DRNG AND DAMAGE 68BE2 I 1989,0700 X DRNG 18631 111TH PL SE WATER ON SIDEWALK/89-0650 FRITON B86E2 1990,0075 c· DRNG 11254 SE 186TH ST PLUGGED CULVERT/STORM 686E2 ·( JJ-0141 C FLOG 18400 112THAVE SE POND OVERFLOW/90-0140,235,372/STOR 686E2 1· I Pose 1 of6 I FEB. 3.2004 12:05PM KC WLRD N0.306 P,3/7 In Coml]lalllt g: Jypuof Problent Addreaa of Probl9m · Comments lbrtJsl'agl I llUmb8r :-1990-0149 C FLOG 11202 SE 186TH ST RID POND OVERFLOW/ROBERT/ STORM E 68GE2 -1990-0231 C ORNG 18425 1121ll AVE SE RID POND OVERFLOW/STORM 90-274,37 666E2 I 1990-0235 C FLOG 11202 SE 188T,H ST WATER IN BASEMENT/STORM/90-141,149, 686E2 .... 1990--0274 C FLOG 11022 SE 184TH PL RID POND FLOODED/STORM 686E2 I ,.., 199()..0342 C FLOG 11202 SE 186TH ST RIO POND/ROBERT/ STORM EVENT 6S6E2 '-1990·0372 X DRNG 11202 SE 188TH ST RIO PONDS OVERFLOW9/90·141, 149.235,2 686E2 -1980-0664 ER MANHOLE 12400 SE 201STPL FAILURE-LINDA CREST PLAT DIV 1 & 2 686F3 I -1990-0709 CL FLOG 18504 1121ll AVE SE CL#12959 SEE CL#13224 DUE DECEMBE 686E2 -1990·0884 C ORNG 18427. 112TH AVE SE RID POND DRAINAGE/STORM 686E2 1990-0910 C FLDG 12403 SE 202ND PL WATER FROM NEW DEVELOPEMENT 686F4 I '--199()..1061 CL FLOG 11202 SE .186TH ST CL.#13224 SEE CL#1295S GARAGE FLOO 686E2 )t1990-1063 C DRNG 12025 SE 196TH ST SPRING HILL ONE/DITCH NOT DRAINING 686F3 -1991)..1186 CL FLOG 11044 SE 186TH ST MEMO/RUDDELL$ STUDY TO PA 686E2 I ·~ 1990-1212 C DITCH 11044 SE 188TH ST RD/SIDE DITCH-FILU90-1186 686E2 -199()..1212 E FILUDIT 11044 SE 186TH ST· WILL START WORK 09/20 CHK ON 09/30/9 6861=2 I -1990-1212 ER FILUDIT 11044 se 186TH ST RUDELLS STUDY 6861:2 ~ 1990-1226 C DRNG 18615 107THAVE SE FLOODED BASl=MENT/BAD ROADWAY 686E2 -1990-1445 C DRNG 18427 112THAVE SE RID POND OVERFLOWING TO STUDY/91-1 686E2 I 0 90-1466 C EROSION 12601 SE 201ST PL LINDA CREST 68eF4 : 90-1530 SR FLOG 18427 112THAVE SE STORM EVENT 686E2 -1900-1531 SR FLOG 18427 112THAVE SE STORM EVENT NOT NDAP 686E2 1-1990.1577 SE STUDY 12601 SE 201ST PLACE STUDY OF AREA 686F4 -1990.1596 C FLOG 12403 SE 202ND PL WATER ON ROAD/YARD/LINDA CREST ST 686F4 ~1990-1612 X DRNG 12601 SE 201ST ST @ LINDA CREST DIV II 686F4 ,,: 1991-0150 C DRNG 18624 112TH AVE SE 686E2 ~ 1991-0150 SR DRNG 18624 112THAVE SE NOTNDAP 68BE2 ~ 1991-0196 C FLOG 18425 112THAVE SE 686E2 1-1991-0196 SR FLOG 18425 112TH AVE SE NOTNDAP 686E2 -1991-0253 C DRNG 11254 SE 186TH ST 68BE2 -~1991-0299 C FLOG 19835 121ST AVE SE: OVERFLOW OFF PIPES 686F3 ~1991°0299 SR FLOG 19835 121ST AVE SE REFER TO BALD 686F3 -1991-0338 C FLDG 11214 SE 196TH ST LEVEL OF PANTHER LAKE/STORM EVENT 686E3 L, 1991.0338 SR FLDG 11214 SE 196THST STORM EVENT NOT NDAP 686E3 I 1991•0426 C FLOG. 12100 SE 197TH ST WASHOUT OF ROAD/DEVELOPEMENT 68BF3 -1981-0436 S1 SPK TO FINISH 51 3/4 · S2 TO '92 CON 686E2 l-:·1991-0512 C FLOG 20024 124TH AVE SE CATCH BASIN LEAKS/OVERFLOWS 686F4 ..l 1991-0579 C WTR S/1/1/ 20313 122ND AVE SE WATER OVER SIDEWALK 686F4 f: 1991·0579 E WTR S/1/1/ 20313 122NDAVE SE OH/SWM DIV PLY 686F4 1991-0579 EH WTR S/1/1/ 20313 122NDAVE SE OH/SWM DIV PLY 686F4 -1-)·0580 C FLOG 20803 124THAVE SE SMALL DRAIN SYSTEM CLOGGED 686F4 I . I Page2of8 I FEB. 3.2004 12:05PM KC WLRD In :1 ~: Jypa of Problem Addresa ar Proolem I -1991-0667 CL DRNG 18427 112THAVE -1991-0798 S1 · I --1991-0837 C -1991-1005 C -1991-1095 C I -1991-1120 LS -1991-1132 C I -1991-1149 X -1991-1165 C -1992-0689 S3 FLOG 12403 DAMAGECB 19001 DRAINAGE 12213 11200 19300. 19008 11200 11007 SE 202NDPL 116TH AVE SE 199TH ST SE 186TH ST 108TH AVE 118TH AVE SE 184TH ST SE 196TH ST I. -; 1993-0383 C -1993-0383 RN . FLDG, FLOODING DRAINAGE FLOG RID DRAINAGE STUDY FLOG FLDG DRNG 20247 117TH AVE 20247 117TH AVE -1993-0592 C 12209 SE 208TH ST :_.. 1993-0794 WOA DUMPING I I- 1993-0794 woe DUMPING 1994-0038 C PONDING 1994-0321 C INQUIRY 1994-0431 C PONDING I r~ 994-0498 C DITCH { )994-0556 woe GREEN/CB _: 1995-0048 C DRNG 199&.0076 C DRNG 1995-0226 WQC MUD FLOW 1; DRNG DITCH 12561 12561 11430 12525 12602 19701 11320 20255 20803 20255 19803 ~ 1995-058 7 X 1-:=-1995-0594 C ~ 1995-0596 C FENCING 20424 -1995-0800 C CONSTRUC 20418 I· -1995-0600 NOA CONSTRUC 20418 -1995-0800 R CONSTRUC 20418 l l't• 1995.0974 C FLOODING 19701 II! 1995-1067 C RUNOFF 19831 -1996-0081 C RID POND 20255 l )t 1996-0243 C DRNG 19631 '_ 1996-0244 C DRNG 11403 ft 1996-0245 C RUN OFF 19526 1-1996-0432 FCC PIPE? 11645 -1996-0632 FCR RID POND 11705 I' ~ 1996-0729 ' 1996-0788 --'16-0788 11 ) 11 I C ORNG 11705 C FLOG NOA FLOG 12232 12232 SE 203RD PLACE SE 203RD PLACE SE 192ND ST SE 203RD PLACE SE 202ND PL 121ST AVE SE 208TH ST 124TH AVE 124TH AVE SE 196TH & 118TH A 124TH AVE 121ST AVE 121STWAY 121STWAY 121STWAY 121STWAY 121ST AVE 121ST AVE 124TH AVE 121ST AVE SE 204TH ST 122ND PL SE 208TH Si $ 203RD ST SE 203R!) ST SE 200THST SE 200TH ST N0.306 CUlllmenta SE SEE 91·0438 SEE RUDDELL$ SE C/8 BELOW GRADE PONDING IN YARD/FENCING RUDDELL POND OVERFLOW SE SE INFO TO PM&D P.4/? CCF# SWM-1031 R/D.PONO CAPICITY 686E2 68BF4 686E2 686F3 686E2 686E3 686E2 686E2 INFO TO BALD DIU./PARKING LOT EXPAN 686E3 CULVERT UPGRADE SE UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT SE UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT SURCHARGE FROM GIB TOWOA TOWQA POSS GRADING/FILLING VIOLATION ANY PIPES IN YARD WHERE SHE WILL DI PONDING IN GUTIER SE GRAVEL DUMPED IN ROADSIDE DITCH 688F4 686E4 686F4 686F4 688F4 888F4 686E2. 888F4 686F4 6861:3 POSSIBLE ALGAE GROWTH NO POLLUTA 686E4 SE WORK IN WETLANDS CONTACT AINSLE 686F4 SE GROUND WATER & PVT DRAIN 686F4 SE RFDDES GRADING 686E3 SE WETLAND ON HIS PROPERTY 686F4 SE REQUEST TO ENCLOSE R/S DITCH 686E3 SE REQUEST TO INSTALL FENCE ALONG EA 686E4 SE PROPOSED RETAINING Wf.LL IN ORNG E 688E4 SE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL IN DRNG E 686E4 SE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL IN DRNG E 686E4 SE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION IN R/S DITCH 688E3 SE EROSION FROM NEW SCHOOL CONST 686E3 SE DOWNSTREAM IMPACT FROM RID ounE 686F4 SE DOWNSiREAM IMPACT SCHOOL DE:VELO 686E3 ADJACENT PROPERTY DISCHARGE ON P B86E4 SE SPRING HILL ELEMENTARY INFO RD$ DIT 68SF3 MAINT NEEDS OF COUNTY RD SIDE DJTC 686E4 GROUNDWATER IMPACT TO PVT PROP 686E4 GOUNDWATER SURFACING BY DRIVEWA S86E4 FLOODING DUE TO STORM AND SUBSTN 686F3 FLOODING DUE TO STORM AND SUBSTN 68SF3 Pago 3 of6 I' FEB. 3.2004 12:06PM KC WLRD N0.306 P.5/7 \__ •(,•8~ Type TYPDnfProblem Addraaa of PJ'igifmn Comments lbrosP81JD -. llmnbllr Coll8 . .1 -1996..0788 R FLDG 12Z32 SE 200TH ST FLOODING DUE TO STORM AND SUBSTN 686F3 -I{ 1996-0805 C DRNG 19400 120THAVE SE DRAINGE FLOW QUESllON DEVELOP INF 6S6E2 ••. -'\1996-1233 C FLOG 19910 118TH AVE SE GROUNDWATER IMPACT TO PVT PROP 6S6E3 -1996-1564 C DRNG 18908 113THWAY SE PRIVATE PROPERTY IMPACT TO PVT PRN 686E2 ;.._ 1996-1613 C FLDG 19910 118THAVE SE ROOF ORNS PlUGGED PVT PROB 686E3 I. --'-1996-1635 C DRNG 20024 124TH AVE SE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IMPACT 686F3 -1996-1738 C DRNG 12047 SE 209TH ST INFO REQUE;ST DOWNSPOUT DISCHARG 686E4 I -1996-1763 FCR SIGN 20537 122ND PL SE DAMAGE TO TEMPORARY POND SIGN 686E4 -1S86-1906 E RID POND 12813 SE 232ND Pl FlcNCE ENCROACHMENP INTO TRACT 686F3 ~1997-1102 FCR RID POND 20316 122NDCT SE TREE FALL AND MAINTENANCE NEEDS N 686E4 I _ 1997-1123 C GRADING 18908 113lH WAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 6861:2 ~ 1997-1123 R GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 686E2 -1997-1505 C _TREES 12232 SE 200TH ST DANGEROUS TREES ON COUNTY PROP 686F3 ·I 1997-1550 C FI.OODING 19631 121ST AVE SE -PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN DEVELOPM 686E3 'fJI 1997-1550 R FLOODING 19631 121ST AVE SE PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN DEVELOPM 686E3 1997-1550 S1 FLOODING 19631 121ST AVE SE PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN PEVELOPM 686E3 1-_ 1997-1572 C TREE 12232 SE 200TH ST REMOVAL OF WINDFALLS REQUIRED 686F3 -1998-0019 C DRAINAGE 19016 118TH AVE SE NEW GRAVEL RD POSSIBLE PVT PROP IM 686E2 Ir -lsB-0058 C DRAINAGE 18820 116THAVE SE SFR CONST IMPACTING ADJACENT PROP 686E2 '"-., 98-0089 WQC DUMPING 11805 SE 204TH ST DUMPING OF ROOFING MATERIAL IN RID 686E4 .., 1998-0089 WQR DUMPING 11805 SE 204TH ST DUMPING OF ROOFING MATERIAL IN RID 686E4 1-1998-0090 FCR ACCESS 11806 SE 204TH ST LACK OF MAINTENANCE ROAD TO MAINT 686E4 -. 1998-0108 woe OIL SPLL SE 199 ST/124 AVE SE SPILL OF POLLUTANTS ALONG RD R/\/v 686F3 -1998-0223 FCR FENCE 20814 127TH PL SE DAMAGED FENCE ADJACENT TO FENCE 686F4 I-1998..0236 C DRAINAGE 11715 SE 203ROST BERM AROUND CB NEEDS REPAlflED -688E4 · -1998-0244 C DRAINAGE 20620 119THAVE SE r,JEW SFR CONST LOT DRNG NOT FUNCTI 68GE4 -1098..0361 C DRAINAGE 12463 SE 198TH PL INFO REQURST RE WETLAND/OPEN SPA 686F3 1-1998-0386 C DRAINAGE 11804 SE 204THST REQUEST TO ENCLOSE DRAINAGE $WAL 886E4 -1998-0386 R DRAINAGE 11804 SE 204TH ST REQUEST TO ENCLOSE DRAINAGE SWAL 686E4 1-, 998-0504 FCC WETLAND 20809 114TH Pl SE POSSIBLE FILL IN WETLAND BUFFER 686E4 -1098-0922 FCR RD PLUGD SE 208TH ST 1127TH A VE PLUGGED ORIFICE & FENCE REPAIR 686F4 -1999-0306 C DRAINAGE 11818 SE 188TH ST ADJACENT PROP PAVED 2500 SQ FT 686E2 1-1999-0325 C DRAINAGE 20531 122ND Pl SE LOT GRADING/DRAINAGE NEW HOME CO 686E4 -1999-0385 FCR FENCE 20502 122ND PL SE CONSTRUCTION OF FENCE ACROSS ORN 686E4 -1999-0385 R FENCE 20502 122ND PL SE CONSTRUCTION OF FENCE ACROSS DRN 686E4 1-1999-0388 C DITCH 20414 121STWAY SE REQU TO FILL IN DRNG ESMT 686E4 • -1999-0503 C FENCE 12455 SE 198TH PL REQUEST FOR FENCE BOLLARDS AT AOC 686F3 .-1999-0521 C DRAINAGE 20629 119TH AVE Sf; REQUEST TO PIPE BIO-SWALE 686E4 -1999-0877 C DRAINAGE 12227 SE 208TH ST PONDING WATER ROAD IMPROVEMET 686E4 -1 9-0877 R DRAINAGE 12227 SE 208TH ST PONDING WATER ROAD IMPROVEMET 686E4 ' I I Page 4 of8 I 12:06PM KC WLRD N0.306 P.6/7 FEB. 3.2004 • () CnmJJlalnt TYPU rypa of Problem Alldmaa Of PrdJl8m. &ammllnta Tbroal'aOII . Nnmll9r COIis I -f" 200()..0226 R BSR 20620 119TH AVE SE SURVEY BIOSWLAE ANO UPSTREAM SYS 686E4 --1 2000-0415 C MNM 12206 SE 207TH PL VEGETATION GROWTH 0 IN TRACi. TRACT 666F4 I ..-2000-o'sn C DDM ACROS 19029 120TH AVE SE APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. 686E2 .-2000-0572 R DOM ACROS 19029120TH AVE SE APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. 6S6E2 ~ 2000-0634 FCR WQO 20506 122ND PL SE ABANDONED VEHICLE ADJ TO RID IN RO 68BE4 I .--.2000-0640 R DDM 20629 119THAVE SE ALREADY REVIEWED UNDER 99-0521. Al 686E4 -2000-0640 WOR DDM 20629 119TH AVE SE 686E4. I -·2000-0713 C DDM 12232 SE 200TH ST INCREASE FLOWWS IMPACTING DRAINA 686F3 -2000-0713 NOA-DOM 12232 SE 200TH ST INCREASE FLOWS IMPACTING DRAINAGE 686F3 -2000-0713 R DOM 12232 SE 200TH ST INCREASE FLOWS IMPACTING DRAINAGE 686F3 I 2001-0076 R BSR 11808 SE 204TH ST BIO-SWALE RETRO Fli. CATEGORY C. CL 686E4 ~ 2001-0181. C DOM 119TH AVE SE & SE 196 GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE OVER SIDE 686E3 -2001-0214 C DDM 20813 126THAVE SE UTILITY WORK DAMAGED STUB OUR DRA 686F4 I -2001-0311 R BSR 11705 SE 203RD BIO.SWALE RETRO FIT. CATEGORY C 686E4 2001-0360 FCC MMG · 12025 SE 196TH ST OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERT 686E3 ;t 2001-0360 NDA-MMG 12025 SE 196TH ST OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERT 686E3 I 2001-0360 R MMG 12025 SE 196TH ST OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERT 6BBE3 -2001..0377 C DDM 20418 123RD CT SE SINK HOLE DEVELOPING ON PROPERTY. 686E4 I r-2001-0416 wac WQB 12232 SE 200TH ST CONCERN OF SOAP SUDS BEING OISCHA 686F3 )01-0444 E MMA 20714 122ND PL SE 2 ISSUES MAINTENACE OF RD RMI: RE;FE 686E4 '--122ND PL 686E4 -2001-0444 EH MMA 20714 SE 2 ISSUES MAINTENACE OF RD RN/: REFE • -2001-0444 FCR MMA 20714 122ND PL SE 2 ISSUES MAINTENACE OF RD R/1/11: REFE 686E4 _, 2001-0444 R MMA 20714 122ND PL SE 2 ISSUES MAINTENACE OF RD RN/; REFE 6B6E4 "'. 2001-0455 wac WQB 12313 SE 198TH ST APPARENT LACK OF POLLUTANT CONTR 686F3 .... 2001-0455 WOR woe 12313 SE 198TH ST APPARENT LACK OF POLLUTANT CONTR 686F3 "" 2001-0632 FCC woo 12430 SE 208TH ST APPARENT DUMPING OF PAINT OR ?7 INT 6S6F4 -2001-0632 WQR woo 12430 SE 208TH ST APPARENT DUMPING OF Pl'IINT OR ?7 INT 686F4 1-2001-0825 C DOM 20832 120TH AVE SE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AT CONTACTING CO 686E4 -2002-0179 woe WQI SE 208T & E OF 121STWAY SE REPORTED SEPTIC SMELL IN CATCH BAS 686E4 .-2002-0267 FCR BSR 20530 122ND PL SE BIO.SWALE RETRO-FIT 686E4 -2002-0267 RET 8SR 20530 122ND PL SE BIO.SWALE RETRO-FIT 686E4 -2002-0403 C MMA 12235 SE 199TH ST REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES ON COUNT 686F3 1-2002-0411 FCR MNM 20522 122ND PL SE MAINTENANCE REPORTED DAMAGED PO 686E4 -2002.0553 C OTA 19013 114TH CT SE CONCERN REGARDING POSSIBLE SLOUG 6661:2 ...., 2002-0560 FCR MNW 19250 117TH PL SE REQUEST TO REMOVE TANSY RAGWORT 686E3 1-2002-0604 woe woo #43 114 & SE 211TH LN ALLEGED DUMPNG OF PAINT INTO STOR 686E4 -2002-0604 WQR woo #43 114 &SE211TH LN ALLEGED OUMPNG OF PAINT INTO STOR 686E4 -2002·0810 C MMF 11818 SE 208TH ST REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGAROIN 866E4 .... 2003-0181 WOA WQAI 11436 SE 208TH ST 686E4 -""'3·0230 11 ) C DCA 11455 SE 196TH ST APPARENT DIRT BERM CONSTRUCTION. 6BBE3 I Page 5 of6 I I FEB. 3.2004 12:07PM ·. KC WLRD I > COll!Pl&lnt Type ... ( Typg of ProlJlam llumll8r COiia Addre8a or PrltJlam I . "'" 2003-0230 R ,,, 2003-084 7 C DCA DOM I ..-2003-084 7 R DOM -2003-0947 WQA WOAI I I I I I I { --) .. , I I I I I I I I I . 11455 SE 196TH ST 19230 116TH AVE SE 19230 116TH AVE SE 11517 SE 208TH ST N0.306 P.7/7 Commanta TbrQP11118 APPARENT DIRT BERM CONSiRUCTION . 686E3 APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF .OFFSITE C 686E2 APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE C 686E2 686E4 Page 6 of 6 I I I I I I I I() I I I I I I I I I FEB. 12 .• 2004 10: 24AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.1/26 King County Water and Land Resources (WLR) Division 20! S 1ackson St, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104·3855 FAX ·To: ~Vf&#pv {:MA41J/J/ . Fax: Jlo{):2.85 787{ Phone: __ &=-----fl//J,~• ~'-- RE: Level 1 Analysis Date: Number of pages including cover sheet: _.5fL_ From: Candi McKay. Eng Tech II WLR Stonnwater Services Section Phone:206-296-1900 Fax Number: 206-296-0192 · To follow is a list of complaints received by the Water and Land Resources Division Drainage Services Section. Complaint numbers beginning prior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in· our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, but will talce additional time and may not be beneficia(to your research due to their age, development which has occurred, etc. If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can be obtained for$ .15 per page, and $2.00 per page for plans. Keys: Type otlnvesthmlion C Acdon Rcquelt BCW J3uslness'fotCloan Wawr CCP Re,pon1e ro lnqui<y •c~ Clalm Bil Bnfo<umont on Hold BR Bnforcemcnt Rovi~w FCC.l'CR,PCS FooililY Complainis Fl SWM P .. lnquuy l'lR SWM fee Review Pill SWM P .. on Hold •LS LawlWt RR fp;iUiy Bnl?neerins R..evle.w NDA Neighbl>rhoocl Drain,go A«istance WQC Wator Quali!y Complain, WQB W11<r Qulllily Bnfor<ement WQI\ W-Quality Ensineer!n11 Reviow WQA Water Qualily A•di, WQO Wuio.Quullty-Othor s1.s2,SN3 Bnsineering S111dlos Type or probl~m DC,' DDM DBS DLI! DTA INQ MMA MMl' ldMO MMW MNM MNW SWF WQB WQD WQI lU!M ORT NWD Devclopmonl/Const111Cllon Dndnap • MiscoHaneou, Orait'lo.go -Brosion/Sedimc:,1tation Diolnase -Lnnda~dellllt1!\ Movenlenl ProJn1sc Technical Anittanc;c Droinat• -Gc,uor,I J,,qul!y MIUntonance · AHtheckl Maln1om1J1Ce • Floodln; MaJncenancc · GonC111J · Malnu:n1nc;e • Mowir,~ MaiJ\tonMct ... Needs Maintc.rlancc. Maintcnnnoo.:Noxiou• We,dt SWM Foe Q11esl.ioos · W4!er QuAUty -Best M1111apmont fr><;lices Wot« Quality-Dumping wa,..-Qualhy -lllioi, Conntotlon . · SWM Fee ·Remeawremcnr SWM 1'¢-0t11111 SWM' Feo-New Discount I ~B.12.2004 I . n 10;t~~i'Q C'$Jl{VY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOt:J? .. ~213 . SURFACE WAT~F! MANAGEMENT DIVISION I I I I I I I COMP~INT iNVESTl~ATION REPORT D110A80'd: NATURE OF COMPLAINT: LOCATION;, COMPLAINANT: ' Mtwt an Wei, :,f ~. I ( _):OMPLAINT RECEIVED BY: ' IL1" I I I I I I I I I i DETAILS 01' INVESTIGATION: · ·-·o;, site 'i-20-90 ..... Sketch on reverse side: Yes 1w' No O Photos: Yes S _!::_No D Ouant11y The Webster property is relatively level. SE 196th St is a shoulder type roadway wi.th dit no storm drains. The culverts were open and free of any major drainage obstacles. To the east of 121st Ave SE, just prior to the slope of 196th increasing, the ditch appears to have sloughed in, and could be a restriction to run off. Spoke with Mrs Webster but she knew nothing of the problem. Photo l) Looks west on SE 196th. Webster house is in photo at left. 2) Looks east on 196th. Webster culverts are in right foreground. 'C;oMPLAirf·fiNvesriGATEo'i'iv:'· -C . . #.T-~~ . -... . -----... . . --·foATE: · 7-i.3 -Po 4\0N TAKEN: C., //.,, v,lt:,---e..S ~ g~(-C)<!) to O o W~. ""OLA to.Je,& r.,,, /J,;.,t iJ<.V-<:"1>7<; ,,..,.,,. /96.j/. Wd.J'-h lo/1:,,r ,8.p 4:iw~~. /)r.J,,P/N-k• Ph.,,....., y-CJ..-.J_.. A..., D () t.l '7' rlf ,1 <!,. ?" j) IV!.,. ,v 7"~ e>,) 'Al pf, J p I ;"c., I/, . -~t&.b: ........ --. . --. Complalnant advised of action possible or Personal Contact D Letter Q ~~~;a;~; ~~;,~n H~~~;e~ ;~·-t· ~>b''"""'..:;:z......~~~:;.....---lc1~sed: ~ f> !ti Mo -·· ,-. -'"\_;ir . j·oK'd:~ lnltlafa I I FEB.12.2004 10:25AM KC WLRD ,~~f.,.;' K!' I t I . 1' )~ ... -·· . I I I I I I te. I -1 \/ 11 I I I I I I I I ·, . . . I tt ___ __;;,..__ ' -_,!.._._ ¥ , • •• ··- ·- N0.508 P.3/26 ' sca,,No ::. ---;-=--_ It." t.°"' c. j 1 I I I I I I I I I IC) I I I I I I I I(_) ... I :t:· ·~ .. -;..,·: 0 10:25AM KC WLRD TO: Filo SUBJECT: Spring Hill . Downstrearn Drainage Job No. 138-13-896 MEMO N0.508 ... FRC i.11: ~a, Jr. DATE; June 28, 1990 ---··-------· ··--·· P.4/26 . Yesterday morning William Flnl,belner and myself, 1n re:s:pc.;nse to Change Order No. 5, walked the road side ditch ~long S.E. 196th Street and met with Mrs. Webster who lives r1( trie corner of s E 196th Street and 121stAvenue $.E. The Websters have lived at the cu:'1er since 1943. We introduced ourselves ae the developer and the engine0;. She ~~as concerned and so was her husband of what was going tu be done with the st0rrn 1.irainage from the development. She indicated that in the r• .;J 1960s King County plaGf::0 o culvert under 196th and reconstructed thci c!rainag to drain towards the south cmto the Webster property. She said the County tole rKrn that wuG the natural way the drainage flows. Mrs. Wells,·; ·,t«ted tt1at in 1968 they (the Webster's) dug a ditch from 196th along their back'c .;.,Jrty line tovv,'.lrd:i 1213!. I asked her if there werl;) any storm drainage µrobii:r 118 ·,, .: i t!·1e currer·,• ,.!: '•:r1. Her ro$ponse was no, they wore concerned with tile pu,,,.:; .. , · ... ,~ of bein 8 ,,,;,.,. ... ,.:, ./.,. ti,,.:Jt the "big culvert" was placed \!"'(.'.lr<),<i~ ·, .' 200 feet wr,,;· ·: •ri,·.:r pr;·,pP.rty corner (the culvert she was referring.to ••1 e ., ,-rl,~'N or· ~hr' •1 '1 ... •tr, ~r"'!Y'':"' Tor Spring Hill). . '. ' •' T ',I' ' -I::· .. ',, 11,t. :,1 :11' ·Ii!,...,...., J :':1•.1 ,1: 'J heavy rain if she or h-::· neighbors were ·,: .. ,).:l h"r wh.ere her drainfield ,v,;3 :ocated with ,•~r:! that ;1 ,;,,, .. ,,', the back (ri the house in the .·. is '.', , ~(a' of ir, ii1e i;/rainfield with high ,:,:,r,'... . ni,,· ara,nfie;d. She responded no . . ,·, : , ,,. ·-..... _ , c.1s talking with her 11usbe1nd but he was at ..... , ,rr ·, ., . .,_ , ,..r i ,,,; r::-ir<I win1 his home numl.>er and ask that he ' /,I . , I, , ,. ! ,·,~h:·J Mrs. W,::l:;:,ter if :,l~e cuuld then take us and show us on her property where '.he flooding problem w::is occurring. She said that they were concerned of a potential flooding frorn che r.ww development and that there was no flooding of their pmpr>rty sinr.o they built the ditch in 1968. · ,,11:do14 I I I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I , l.! I FEB.12.2004 · 10=26AM KC WLRD N0.508 A CJVIL ENGINEERING, tAND SURVEY,ANO PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSU~TINCi FlltM July 25, 1990 Ms. Lydia Reynolds South King County Review Engineer· King County B.A.L..O. 3600 136th Pl. SE, Suite A Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Plat of Spring Hill Kin~ Counfy e.A.L.O. #789-21 Revised Downstream Analysis Change Order #5 Dear Lydia: • Job No. 138-13·896 P.5/26 Enclosed for your review is the additi9naJ downstream survey information and c/llculatior.:; for the ditch along !he north side of S.E. 196th Street and the Webster's property. As reques"C<1d by King County, the Manning's number has been incrC1ased from 0.035 to oJ ~cJO for the check of the ditcr, ;;long the Webster's property. The.flow during ;~ I.~ year /24 hour storm e•;en\ which crosses the culvert in S.E. 196th is 2.0 C'fs. ; ;·.,s combined with the basi,, •xr the south side of 196th develops 4. 7 cfs. comribc.w •:J to the Webster';; dit.:..:il In r,:1vi<1w of the Webster's ditch sectioni:, the " .. '1: .;,::: . · · • ,::,'1r:;1!y of~;,.~ '1ir,;ii i•: :,. '.i d•1 bssed on the revised Manning's number. ":"f ,;,:,,,.-. · • .:~ ditr:n ~1!:,, AJ :: :•:, ·,:; ,::o.·1··· ,: ,Yoperty can adequately :ur.dle me • ···--t1r ~-.,.,.,'J!"l?tl \"lrhi1· ,·,, ::•r, .. .,,,Jt1f' ' ....... - I ·,. .:·, ' I / 1' ,,.> .J '-·\.,(., ( ... - DARRELL L. O;=FE Project Engineer Enclosure· ·: . · · ., ,·• .. i·.ine1l ,•1formatinn. nlfl"l'3-" :,cal tree to cc: Mr. Ned Langford, Subdivision Manager Wllliarn Finkbeiner · I I I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I I( ) I FEB.12.2004 10:26AM KC J.ILRD (io&) 4f,4•Tm . 12011 ~-Red Road 1200 aenevue, \Nashtngton 98()05 N0.508 Ju~y 25, 1990 1\.9. l.yd u, Re ynoJ.dF S0,1th Kl.Ilg Cour1i;y !l11vie1.: Engineer· King County ,.A.L.D. )600 -136th Place S. E., Suite A Bellevue, Washtngton 98006 De,u Lydia: Ile : Plat of Siring Hill Ch11ns:o Qr er 115 At approximately 6 P.M. on July 10,1990 Darrell Oftc of I.S.M., David LlaJle of Finkbe1n,r Development and myself had a meeting tJith 'i.Jr. and Mr~. t{ebster 3t their honie at. 12025 S. JL 196th, Renton, Washington, 98058. We discussed with them their complair.,-to Kin; Co\!nty lnsp<>ccor John O'Brien that they had floodint ;,r0l1liin'I. ?!r. ,rnd Mrs. Web-'='te.r: indicaced thet the last floodinc pcoblem thny had was ir1 1968 when King County constt·1,·· >d :, c,.,111""1: !lCrO<:.!l S. E. J.<J&th which flo,.,ed onco their prop<'.~·:··. ,,· .. ,y i,dic:ated ~!l.H they h11d mad,: variou!l ac_cempte to riec l,i, ;.,:,:.,y t'.> r~lr,i:-!lt~ their c>.1lvarc, inc!•.,-:!lng blocking ,:;It:,::: .. 1.·:· ... ~:<;'.t. 'T'li:~'!if' i.~tt:E!r.ipts '\Jece uofJuc...:.:.:..:.~iful and rJOW ,c,, ...•. , ' ,, ... ,.,~.,·1· .,/' ~~r1·no •11·11 "~s un,I·,, ···nstruc"i"n ,_no·~ ·::,,,,,:;::~:.i., .. ,,J1,,.:.,,.,1.,~..., r,'-""'w0 ··'·~\_u ,1.. """' ~.~,--: :,,·. ·.::~.,, .. ,; ::!.~!·: {! i·;,!iag. r!)itl:r occur in c.h~ fui.:ure, .At -, . .'. .. :·:: ;.·:'.. •:-: ::·.1,1 ., r ,h~ cl'1lnning -:,ut ·:,>' thi,i drainage . -, ..... r'o,.. •,i·c,;,erty tO Pl."02.\:,~I\; Llid po~eJ)tial .. ~-:. · .. · ~ : ... ~:: .:-..~: l: corH;c::ncd ~b .. .,.uc.. l'he Wr.bst.ers ., . .oi:, -! ,. !:i'; <d:Ci::r an<\ wo:.ilcl l:'~ n1e knotJ if ,.1-.. ic f...\:·.,· C('tlnry :1-,ultl like me to , .,.·.· ,;;;,,·~ ::.,, ?en. ,,f my .sat.!.sfy,i.ng . : : ,1 L .,J : ~-. .:J: Y~:,u \..'urd: ,~d a f oc t. or of :.:·n. <·f'":"l"J..&:: ·t"i!qu1t"~m~nt !ind if the : c. d,' :.t>e d raio;,g1a: -..ork th«n you ,. : ·· :::-., i::,:, pr:,.h·:~nt later co:npli!iint.~ if i" ·· :····:· :.,:,;;:,,,;er,(ly, l caJ.led :he Websters at ,,,,. __ .,::, .. ·.·:,,"· • )·,M. <H• .'u,/ z:,, 1990 m,d I iH,kcd M: .. Yf!bSter if h,· h:1·~ ·,,.1:1.1:( :3t;,,Ut. i;i;; \llt'ti: to clean his ditch.· ~e said he '"·" .:.a<::i'ie.l ,-,z<i:inst allowing eny vorl< on h:!.s property. He ,.,,n\ h" would liks> to sell his property to me for S225,000.00, He would be r~~iring in approximetely two years and he wanted i.b~ u:,le t<> clone at that ti~e. I told Ht. Webster that I was I I I I I I I I I I .-) (/ I I I I I . -z .. · July 2'$, 1990 probably not interes~ed at th~t price but th~t I would be happy to talk with him soml' more in the future, At thi$ point t aeked Mr. Webeter if he would prov1de me with,a ·letter Stating that·he would not sll.ow me to enter n1s property to clean the ditch. Mr. Wtb9t.r indica,ed that he would not provide me with.s~ch a· le.cter. ~e ·explained that he felt King County -was wrong in ,:!u~pi,1g the culvert on his pro'/'Jerty from the north side of S. E. 196th, Ht ?xplair1ed. he wanted King county to remove the culvert to keep the ,1a te r on the north e.ide of s. IL 196 th or ao an slternat1ve co reerade the ditch on the south side o! S, E. 196tr. an(\ 1::i-11er the C\llvei:t in 121st "venue s. E. at S, E, 196th, Mr. tlebstor feels th.1.13 will Allow the water eo atay in the roe<h,id,; ct t tch and, conse~uently, not flow onto his r-=o,)!!rt y. 1n :;umn\<1:·y, Mr, Wel)gter l?111 r>ot atlolJ me cc, enter hi~ t>roperty tc> ,u:·un tt,i\ dr11inege ditch and he "1:111 not give II lectec .n.,,:tr.e :id.s ,,.,c,·. He want~ King County 1.0 solve. a probl~m he m,:l':~aia,:i LJ,.,.-,:n,~'..t!d 1n l968. Wii<1t 1101J? I I '\ I ) --FEB.12.2004 10=27AM I 'n I . KC WLRD, 'N0.508 P.8/26- I I I I I KING COUNiY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type __c:. ~:~'..".::' by: ~~P. .. ··--·-...... ' ............. Date; . _z/ 8/.J (p__OK'd by:·.··-········· .. File No. qfp ~ Zt.f: flaceivecl from: (Pleaoe print plainly tor =nnino). (D>y) · (Ev•) ADDRESS: .Locetlon or problem, tt different: / q (p -rh 4-. ·---········-···-·-······-·-··-···········-·-···--····-··----·······-·····-···----. ... -- Reported Problem: Pt CTDc!-ecc . rne~s-a:;f- vUr-J -l-lu . s-h--c d. -#u, . /Lav ..5c-A tJVI . .6--un i 6--u,t'I /. 7'h.,ic I ;;, ll r;f,s ~ 1-kri ·. <A/ler~~ ,-lf-U0">'1 <.JCin?<--~~ l'Vl-uSI be ll.)~ ~()_qe, ~ -lo I I I I -3Jock No: · Otilvr agancics j:wolvg.d: Basin S'QQ Council Distl Charge No:_-,-__ _ -·------.. ---·------.. ----·-·-------------..---- I R£SP0NS£: Ct.i~en ~otr.ied on 2. \(o. 'j'1p by v"" phone _ lst1er _. in person . · . · G..lsi,~ ft\1,v_..A: C:..O.~-""'G...... 4 . \ ~ ~ , , C.,....,j.,_.,t \h.., Q,J:.1. 'Cl\ ,~,._,.,,.,L ~ t O Ef ~~ T \r\~ ~ V 1/'(1. (:;i-QIL <.. z.1.w .... (':)') . · · · I I I 11 DISPOSITION,: Turned to ori by O?.: No further action recommended b~ -'---.Sr-dv'....-7c.J;.I.J"'-.,_J'.!) K Lead egency has been no:hied; j)k;_s 411./o V.><?' ~<#e..,:;;s ,1_,,,._,o v::Ser /;vsr: __ ) _ ?roblen:, has been correcle<f, No problem hes b;,en ic:ieniified. Prior investigation addresses pro -Sf.e Fil~'# ____ _ . f'rivare problem • NOA? will nor oonsider becec,se: -_ Water o;lginaies onslte and/or on neighboring parcel Location Is outside SWM Service Area. . Other (Specify): DATE CLOSE:D: ..? / /~;J'~ bv: ~ ;::>a-,~' r-. n1.~ / , ,c-,, , e-,O I I I I I . " ; I I I ..,. I I I iJ I I I I I I I I I FEB •. 12.2004 10:28AM KC WLRD N0.508 . i,r 1 · . • .-. :···': \ :· /111'1• . . , , . IMJ~~Q :r, ::'·"• t .... :._.'!'4· .. .i : ·, .. : ·· Plant and Facilities( . . . · ·· · ;1 .:·.,-::·: .. e,,:;J,,,,,,,=t=~ne1 dc;-;;:;jiij c:,a ... cs!!!!' ~111m11111111-=~~" l:IWJ=f:;;,, .,...,..:;at:f ~• ..i:; c,;;:: ===~mos era ao-=i.=;;;,e1ae1Clto1 · ' ~ ~-:~;~· ) • Date: February 21. 1996 To: · Clint Marsh i Frorn: Diw1e Pistoll .:. ,. , ,•, r Re:. Voi~ Mail from Larry Get1le • 2/21/98 ,. '' "Good morning -Clint, this fs Larry Gellle, King Covnty Surface Water Marfegernent, ·• sorry it took rne so tong to get back to your call yestorday. 1 Just got off the phone .wltll St~we Townsend, Oeli9h1 Morris's supervisor, discussed with t11m tile concerns regarding the downstream property owners and then your message to ma relaled lo ·1110. off. site flow and tlie downstream restiictions ar,d the enlltl! problem out !here. · • It's still my',op,inion: and Slevo's opinion also, that th1;1 problems out there were pre- existing. They wern addressed as· a part of \he TIR, tiopefully they were, anyway, alfpart of the devi.ilopment ol the site. The Issues shoulcl be resolved in the pormil process, If the11,1 is a problem with the TIR required Pl!ln change or wll~tevor, then either you, your enolneer, or whoever, should be involved with ODES. Ir's not that I'm not Interested it's a memo of understanding tnat we operate vnder where problems lie and the . . . , .. responsibility, this Is obviously a development related Issue and belongs In DDES's ,. court. My only recommendation would be to gel a llold of Delight and or Steve Townsend, \ hav& your meeting with them ragarding tho drainage out them, and if Steve feels.,_that • ' Surface Water Management should be Involved in this thing ttien I'm sure Steve .will give 1J•: r.alL AnywaY., you can 0311 rnr> fll 2%-83?.Ei to rli~cuss the siruation further if you'd lik.:>. Thank you". (" Glon An<:1-~r~on It-IT/)' 81tntr1~1 [1·il> 01 yon I :my r":nttle ilf•dighl !vk,11i:, T,.~111 G1~r1 r 111·.rr /\r.lion Item· ,,. Bob, Please schedulo, or ~;ive Tom Se<1mon schedule, a meeting with Delir,hl Motrl$ ~,,d Terry l'lrtmnf1r 111 the site. · .. .• #-...... , . _;, I I· l I ' ' I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10:28AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.10/26 . . .. ;., .. '•\ 1~ ~ 256 S1root; Kant. Wa;i,fngton 9803\-64,43.. o . . $~. ·.·, .. ,; ~w~;;. ,, .. . GI<'""" ,rp · · ·~r siJ,,;;~ ~'"O,W' . ·. lff~el February 15, 1996 Dear Neighbors: I arn in receipt of the February 9, 1996, leller· to Gary Reinke of King County Surface Water Management. · · · The Keni Sch~~' Distri~t· ~nderstands 'and. shares the concern regarding the largif° volume . of surface water in the area of your homes near the Elementary #28. constniction .site. We appreciate the positive method In ·which you brought your concerns to our attention. The Kent .School District arid Elementary #Z81s architect. along with King County Department of Development and Envlronrnent11I Services, King County Roads, King County Public Works, and King County Surface Water Managernent 1Nill be meeting within the next two weeks to cooperatively determine a solution to manage the large volume of water In the area correctly. You will be notified as soon as a solution has been achieved. If you have any further questions please· call me at s·13-72_77. Thank y.ou very much. Sincerely, Jlfi ~ Glen Anderson, Director Plant & Facilities c: Terry Brunner Bob Bryan George Calley Marie Eastm·an Dr. Hager Clint Marsh Robert May Richard Osborn John Overby Kent Pullen Gary Reinke Al Swanson GHNdp ....... I I I I I I I I I I rJ I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10:29AM KC WI.RD .• , .. ,u,:. : February 9, 1996 . ; N0.508 P.11/26 . ·.~ To: Gary Reinke -King County surface Waste Management cc: Dr. Hager -Supedntendent-Kent School District ( S"5 z.-qs s0) Kent Pullen -King County Council We the undersigned are alanned at the amount of water that is now coming on to our property. We all know the tenn "you can't change the natural flow of water" but there was never this problem before the Spring Hill home development and especially since the new elementary school was started. Our suggestion is that a stonn water system run off pipe must be installed all the way down to 124th S.E. to take care of this situation. What are you going to do about this? G. Cattey . ·.;, ndaJ ~~~<-<,., ,'~~~µ.... I q &..z~ -/.;)_ I ., ,/{!. -a d..,-1\,,, t.<J .::i. tt ~·~ M. Eastman . ma~; ti t:~-?,._J I 96 .$/ /dl/ a1'<' ,S .f ..,, ,A.-,cr,.,,_ V,v ~,PAf (J 1/:,-0~45 R.Osbom ~G,./(_.·t;:-h. -J· -- C/1.,~~ YI"'-· f1r;s?'-I/~, iU';:, 5 °If l 1 S-f Overby d,,#~~"7 ~(9~ 19'~3? I~! S/(=_ "/Z ... r/,',r, #',;r,,?, 9r;,~ f!o/5E-£r "' rfl&/VAJ1€ . ' - I I I I I I I I I {) 11· ) I I I I I I I I I -rEB.12.2004 10:30AM KC WLRD NO. 5.08 P.12/26 -KING COUNTY SURFACE \'I/ATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT . Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type _j; · Re~~:~~-~'.~-1]~-~-------·----·············: ........ D.~~~:~:.?..{?___{']_~---~~~!:.~: .. ~----··-~~e .. ~~'. q 0 ".?..~ Received from: (Plcaoc print plainly for :.:.,nninc). (O,y) ce, NAME:_...:..Ro~1=·0d'.J::::.:...c,,,d1...-...JR-~; d.:..:cd:.......:(:_,,£c:...-_~-· ___ PHONE 852-/7rdn" ADDRESS:_.!.../ q...,_.,,5:;.._2_ea=:...,_. ~-_;12:c..-z.;;;_n_d_ .... P...;L:;;_::Sc..... =E;;;._ City. Rf:A'1 fo ~ . C Stale ZipJ · Location of problem,· ff different: Rep()rted Problem: N e,uJ bl-eJM ~-Vv/ &S~CJ7> L '~ //vi; I< IS erei;u1'v,.cr. ~'716 wh-ick Li>' C~)n.j Neo..v ~.g · V\O'lA5e-ra C)'v-€.v{::-/oW.. l-ks N-e.t3hboi,--he-h;1 h; VY\ +o ~..e. £:.~.+. ho..,~ · wevk.v-w"'-bhi'Vlo, ov-e,i.-- t,-v. 5 '"D/~. ~ _ Wli\G h.:fv-,j c.JiA.k ~ ().AD..O. • . ~e. ~c./A, ~t:~~-p~]~~~ ~~jh t/ujJ.f,; No 7 LocNo / f!Jif::'tTIL · No i"i~ld lr.v;;stiga:io11 Neadad __ B2sin 5DO Council Dist '1 --C~arge No: ____ _ ···---···-·--·--·--·------~·--··-- RESPONSE: C~izen notified on :::, -'?>-5&1 by 'I'-phone _ Isner _-in person 5Po1<.,;. v-./17'rl R..or..AI\JO AND lr0Poe.K~Q HrM -r'HA•r" CD<!l:,$ '"' worW.l"-J(.o II\) ',e>N.JVNC.."i "\l\ll',1-1 !..:HOc>i.. Di~-.Rt! 'T' TC> Ri;!,c,L.\IE RIJNOl'r PR.oa1,.e-M /:'l?.OM _,:/>~1NC,Hlt-L. 'f=(..l: /.:,Av(; H,M PHONE:' Nl.)Mr;!lS:ft!o i:-Ofl... cs~,..,.£ Hc,1'1.(?..1!,(QPIE:S) ArJD ?"'ONY 1...(F{Jf!e'C'T'el~ oe R.OAO~ MAll\)T'e",V;::,ll)tt:.., ~('.,)~~ 3)e'/"10 0/SPDSITION: Turned to on by -----------O?.: No fvrrher e,ction recommended _ Leed egency has been notified: --.,...,...-..,..,.._,,,-._.____,,..,..--.,.,,,.-;------,,....,...._.-c:-:-::-r:-::--:-::==:::::-- ?roblem hes been corrected, _ No problem has been identiiied. Prior investioa1ion addresses -See File tlf __ -___ _ Privare problem -NDAP will not consir,Jer because; -_ water originates onstte end/or on neighboring parcel Location Is outside SWM Service Area. Other (Specif)•): DATE CLOSED: ..3 I/ .. ? I j'.(' by: _:1f;j/ C--=-q/ " .., A..;. I 'n I I I I I I I I ) I I I I I I I I ) I FEB.12.2004 10:30AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.13/26 . -----·-·------------------- l>llte: March 7~ 1996 Date of lllve1tigatio11: MIU'cll 6, 1996 FM: Douglu WAiters RE: Evaluation for Compllliot # !16-0245 Roland Riddle !9S26 122nd PL SB Renton, WA 98058 (206) 8S2-1766 Mr. Riddle is conceiued that runoff from a new elementary school appmimately l/4 niile away is creating runoff' which ill. causing a ·ditch in front of his home to overflow. Tile elementary ~chool is CUJTelltly under COIIBlruction and is located west of Mr. Riddle at approxillllltely 119tli Ave SE and SE I 96th ST, Water leaving the site at the present time is minimal and will be better controlled in the future 011ee the lletentlon system is in and operational (see photos land 2), The real problem appears to be the culvertB in front of Mr. Riddle's home and the a4jacent properties are partially buried by debris and vegetation which has greatly reduced their capacity to handle design flows and volumes (see phom 3,4, and S). Maintenance of tho dltch culverts will probably resolve the problClll of the ditch overflowing. Sf>Rt N(:, Hit..(. t:.1-f:Mgf\}TA~ y .Su-loo... ~ ,..,.e; i.j \fl ~ ~ J\J o,,.e11.,~.:.ow'· p,,-e,H . N R,opoE 1152', .l I· In I FEB.12.2004 10=31An. KC WLRD N0.508 P.14/26 I\ING (.;UUN I Y SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT OIVl~IUN = DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVESTIGATION'AEOUEST Type C.. Reoeivedby; L Grr&;;-Date: ~&-t,/9',tOK'dby: · 14/ FffeNo. 96~ <J_8o Rscslvsd from: (Please print plalnly tor """"nlng). · (Dey) (Eva) I I I I •• I NAME: ML fe Y ,'/un11t.2?JIV'. PH~Ned'f42/7{t{ __ ADDRESS; b pc S &.Jd(f!n.'? C 1(1 {. /)19r11 { City State Zlp Location of problem. If different: Reported Problem: PAVti ,,../A-,tE % y r:r c..?74 h d ,v<' .41:J,. -r1-1 Y/ t>...:-~ >'o /; >/{'(?'/.vC-(../1c.t:.. <;;?c./:/c-oaL .. Wl-4-r Tf-k' J),bf / /V'l'I C""....-· . !>. ") .r£,,.v nk x>, IC) l!t4o I I I I I I I I I. Lot No: 8 Block No: .z.. Other agencies Involved; No Field Investigation Needed ----~-~-@UJ~. · $0 ~3 £ S ParoelNo. 61Cf8L/0 C>34/ Kroll WSW 1/4 S T R Basin ';Jt)O . Council Dist '1 Charge No: ____ _ RESPONSE: Chizen notified on ;;fr TC, .by _ phone ./5 letter _ in person ->t-c /1-'t<.?te ~ L.?;r c352_ QnlUal•) Th.Bros: New 6S~ E~ Old <12As;' 8$j(. DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No further action recommended bet _ Lead agency has been notified;· . Problem has been corrected. --,-,No--pr-o"""bl-em-,-ha-s'""b-e-en""l,..,de-n-:tHl=-e..,d.----::-Pr.,..lo-r ,....ln-ve-st""lg-at""lo_n_a....,dd..,.r-es_se_s_p-rol' ,---~~# . '-Private problem -ND.AP will 'not oonslder bec;ause: · _ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel _ Location Is outside SWM 1/.ervtce Ar . . · DATE CLOSED: _±:_; _;i; K by: . . . _ Other (Specify): I I I\ I I I I I -1 le) I I I I I I I ,, l. ) I FEB.12.2004 10:31AM KC WLRD N0.508 NOISIAIG .LN3V\13~'1NVV\l k13l.'9'M 30'9':ik!nS JJ.NIIU:J tlNl>I P.15/26 rl i Complaint 96--0805 Wilsey Hamil ton. rnveetig~ted by Jacquie Little 03/29/96 , Cite.I,, . ;1 111825 I _, f: /. . T·-~ ---,·--· '" 'Gi.. . w.i.:_· •. ·, -<.····@ -..-+-' o:+ch / !SPRING HILL ~LEMENTAR¥1 i ,;,._, -~ 1'1,f C· !t:,.~ /! :·r ,I, r; ,, I .//;,, , . ,!,- 120TH AVE 1. ·!) IV f' r ., ' r -I(;' st ,., .. .., r /' ~( '' . f • C /,,<fol .f<. L , .. ' r~ <.( ' :, f'\l "·' #.~ ~11.,.) . <."(,"F~' /' " ., f, -'c:-1.: :1 ,• .:··· .; ., ' l..t.,··· t .. + .,, ,· I ' 12 f/ ' '" f' _SE 192ND ST 1/, .,:'; ., i .(, •' I ,/ ,.t.ndc ( I '1' rid ""!) -i h c , I cl ' r, ,' p.::. e:.cn,··~1·+ IA.,/.J.~ .-1,J;,,._ 1'211 ;~ ·t·,,. ,:.., .·, ,. t','' ·ku <' I, - f',',. .. ,.i,,·· ·1 ~ . \~ti /' 'f, <..,-~ cJ r. r "'· ,: .. _:\ " : 'l +:, ·11 .,. (8 t .... ; t,f'',. .'7· C.13 j C'(..:.'1 ~ 1"' ,;l .:, I ' -11,, //.,i If, .: .. ·( ~-1" ... J ·i. I /'Ir .. ·,.r· ·f· "'-a t.'9Pt~ ~ RJ,,,>:1 "' ,cl J t•· ,· 'ii:: µ.) I/ r;,. /ff,,'./:) o ...... , 1e+ ,o" . 1., ., '] Flow!:, IO,~<"--ti C,V") ,}. f 1,:,, ..... NvH I-,~· ::I~ ,:,-1' (•l';! '·d -::.,.,;.J.~h .. , i.:,1'} -i . ..:.... ::.:-irt?,.1.rYi +-1-,c;,.,-,.. down orito .µ.,e school'5 pr,;,p,.1r/y. ,;;,l<..<.:J o. lon3 -I-~ $c>,...t+h l'•·t···t.r·I·/ i.tJ,:t.1-e.r ,r'kwS .fo ..f../:..o. we s+, FEB.12.2004 10=32AM I 'n---1 KC WLRD N0.508 P.15/26 I I I I .lo I I I I ,I: I I , l_) I, TO: · FROM: DATE: KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGl'JMENT INTERNAL MEMORANDUM Wilsey Hal!li;L ton ...AJ A Larry Gettle fV'......; April 6 1 1996 SUBJECT: Hami:lton -96-0805 south 192nd street Drainage -Spring Hiil Elementary Per·your request I have investigated the constructed drainage system along southeast 192nd Street west of 120th Avenue Southeast, reviewed the drainage plans and field notes for Southeast 192nd street and reviewed tbe drainage improvement completed in 1992 and have the following information. The plan/profile for Southeast 192nd street (90~43) shows a 18- inch dia. cross-culvert at Sta. 36+15. A flow direction arrow, on the plan indicates the flow is from south to north. The plan also shows the construction of a "special ditch and a dike to be constructed along the south side of the road, It appears this ditoh and dike were constructed to insure flow was directed into the cross-culvert. A review of the field survey notes (copy enclosed) do not show a cross culvert. A check of the elevations of the driveway culverts and side pipe(?) sh~ws the elevations to be higher on the north side of the road. I also reviewed the 1992 drainage im·provement completed by Roads Maintenance as part of a school path project, The plans do not show the cross culvert. Improvement Plans Sta. 3+30 = SE 192nd Sta. 36+15, All flow to the north side of SE 192nd is conveyed easterly to 120th A~e SE. It is interesting that the basin map shows the flow from this project going south, just west of 120th Ave SE, The problem was discussed in the Road Coordination meeting on April 2nd. Racheal Gutierrez, Roads Drainage Design will investigate further but I don•t think much will come of it. The only concern voiced during the discussion, regarding abandoning the cross-culvert was the history of road shoulder and ditch erosion east of 120th Ave SE. No information was provided why the asbuilt does not match existing conditions. I bad Jacquie Little complete a more '-th:i;"_'?)!!Jh site investigation at the cross culvert. She walked the area between SE 192nd and the school site. A well defined channel was identified that appears to have historically conveyed flows to the south onto the school site. The channel ends where the school graded along the north property line. I I I, I I Ii I i I .. I , .-) c_. I I 1: I I - I Ii I I ) FEB.12.2004 10:32AM KC WLRD ,April 6, 199& Wilsey Hamilton Page 2 N0.508 We did not check invert elevations in the type II catch basin where the cross culvert is located but: it appears from visual observation the cross culvert is lower than the pipe outlet to the east. Also because ·of the entrance pipe from the north it would seem the flow would go south before any would tlow east. ·-JUst because its more of a straight shot to the south. I'll! not sure how much this helps you.with your project. It: appears from existing conditions some quantity of flow does historically flow south to the school site. If a split in the flows is appropriate that would probably match existin~ conditio~s. If the school wants to eliminate all flow to the south they will need to address Roads concern of potential erosion problem east of 120th SE, · If you need further information or I can be of some other assistance please give me a call on 6-8326, 1- 1() I I ii I --1 I - FEB.12 .2004 10:33AM .VKC WLRDAuJ!; .IL!~ VJ!.~ A!l>'A llUJ'l .K1£l'Ul<T N0.508 " \ w -Page I: INYESTIOATIONRE~UEST - PROBL6M: t:loP1::fj B,2CEIVBO BY: )jeJ Received from: · 'j)e'r'lt°k, /.k.S5e.-Cc/AU~) NAME: lv\il,Vit.-8Ct$-l'MM"l Ct1,10./tie..r) ADDRESS: Jq(p~\ -\ '2-\ Sr \lwt 8f Location of problem, if different: r. ' Date:-'Vu -.-. -. . OK'd by: r '}-; !"'' FILE No. 'tX\LAf\ n+er - (Btly) (16,2 l PHONE C'J3'l -qit4-g City?,~ P.19/26 I;(.-/•°/ Type ~ I "_r..4"·,1 ~-.... /,/JlJ,1 I ( ~-Z"f:5 I J',-iSI . -Platname: ~/~ Lot No: I 8 •• I 1: I I I I Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required. __ (Initials) -. TO BE'COMPLETED IIY-"OMPLAlNT PROGRAM S'IA""·'·_, __ :".H,;;;_-· ,;_, ··---':·:I.\~~ ,_.; • .,,,-·o:' -- •• , • • • , o • , ,'< ,• , : • • !"':""' ~-"' .... ~·~•'I •r "N'I ...... ', If. •'"M• '••~" ' 02,)Q R Parcel No.7/3 2 (.,0018'0 Kroll c'PfD 111/ Th.Bros: New (pg<., 6,f:, ~1 :;t O Old +i. Jq, {7t:p s T Basin t1!JD Council District ..:L_ Charge No. _______ _ ... -_ ................ _ .. _____ ,, .. ..,_. .. _" .. '"'""''''' ---.. ..-.... __ , ___ _., ..... _ .. _ .. _, ...... _ .... _, ............ _,_ ........ ",_ ....... ___ .. _ .. __ .. _ REsPONSE: Citizen notified on· Jt--/lr-';7 by: ...?5:_ phone _-_ letter _-_-in person l. ~,.-CI r J'Z ~ !'fH o,c.> (';,.,.,~ £ 4~r lJt:_<.,,,v(,.. $'t:'NT' A,</ ~ /.'u;,e ;,'h'(!',I> .;ffe/t',, .t..vr-Ftl? M./1-f X'(V1FtU. A1;v/' if)/~ (Tl),.,lr/lt'T {lttc#N cvl'f-!: e) 216-8~66 -S:J I .>-9 1f . J1-,1 (~"''"' (<)P ?-<O:t7Ef(1) DISPOSJTJON: Turned tog on I ,J I/JI fZ by_NoR: No further action recommended because: ~ Lead agency has been notified: ______________________ _ _ Problem has been corrected, _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---- i l-Private·problem • NDAP will riot consider because: I _____,1 • Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. -· Location is outside WLRD Service Area. __ Other (Specify): . DATECLOSED: JI J/19tz, By:~ II I I \ I I i I, i I I I(~) I I I· I I I I ) I I ../ FEB.12.2004 10:33AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.18/26 ~--"-""'--,---,----~---· Publlo Workll __,,,.se..,,,__,1L2.41.1<,l_'-.,=r:-'4,i.....<w .......... o ... 'O,Lr»-_.4,,,,_vig .... · ,,,,,...2€>.!Jee:c·'-VW'.llill..:~u>---Projoct ,4.-111 Comp A:k Z:~) Chk-------1'18V------I Cate 6'-J~}ii/ Oate ______ ,Date _____ Page _ _,_1 __ ,ol 1 BASINS CALCULATION AREA AREA= (PERIMETER READ1NG)*(SCALE)**2/43560 ( INCH**2)*(FEET/INCH)**2/(FEET.2/ARCES) Area I : (;t'~Wseotion) Area 1 = ( 0.604 )*(1000)**2 / (43560) = 13.87 arces Since total ·area is less .than 25 arces the~efore rational method is used. l. Flow ?ath Segments for Tc Ll = 700 feet (short grass pasture and lawn) Ks= 7.0 L2 = 900 feet (short grass pastur~ and· lawn) Ks= 7.0 2. slope Sl • (520 -500 )/( 700.) = 2.86E-2 52 = (500 -491 )/( 900) = O.Ol 3. Velocity Equation = 2.86% ;: 1.0% V = Kr (S )*.5 ~ Feet per second Where Ks= 7.0 (short Qrass pasture and lawn) Vl = 7.0*( 2.86E-2 )**.5 • 1.18 fps V2 = 7.0*( 0.010 )**.5 = 0.70 fps 4. Time Travel Tl= L2/(60*Vl) = ( 700 )/(60 * 1.18 ) = 9.8~ minutes. T2 = L2/(60*V2) = ( 900 )/(60 * 0.70 ) = 21.43 minutes To= Tl+ T2 = 9.86 t 21.43 = 31.29 minutes 5. curve Number There are approximate 18 houses. Therefore land cover density is , 18 OU/13.87 arces = 1.30 OU/GA Therefore C = 0.342 6. Rainfal 1 factor For 25 years 24 hours precipitation P = 3.3 a = 2.66 b = 0.65 Ir= Pr* ar *(Tc)"(-br) I = 3.3 * 2.66 * (31.29)'(-0.65) I = 0.963 flow (cfs) = CIA 7. Peak Q Q = (0.342)*(0.963)*(13.87) = 1Kr /!Z.11 AO<!-. '5Jtrt: ~ [ .,S.,il)Y1_,&,~]1 = /. ?:,?,% /It:.// __ ,--, \ 1/11/_J...,, 11: ... /' ... 4.44 cfs I -I '"' I I ~ •• I I I I I I ltJ I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10'34AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.20/26 ·O'UNTY ·--PII;:BN<J. ~T~T-1.:JV · Department of Natural Reeources NAMB MAl'tlE EASTMAN · 1 Water and Land Resourci<> Dlvlelon ADDRBSS 198$1 -1219'1' AVE SE RAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION PHONE (253) 939,9448 TB PAOB KROLL PAGE GjoW MAINT. DIVISION _!.,_ DATE 12•08•97 INITIALS · MAM DBTAILS OF INVESTIOATION: $ITe Vl81T DN 1a..o, .. 9?, PROPEAYY f'LOOD& l!Vl!f'YTIMi? IT FU.INS. WATeR GOES UNPf:R HOVI! CAUSJNQ HEAT DUCTS TO BECOME FLOODED AND H!4T&R SHUT OFF TILL W4T&R I& PUIIPED OUT. INVE8TIOAT10J-I FOUND W4Tl!R IS PROII TWO SOURCES. ONE APPBARG TO BE FROM GROUND WATER ENTBRINO UNDER THB HOUGD. TJ-t!. oTHiA IOURCa APPi!AJIB TO Pl! PROM A COMBINATION OF THe R/0 SY&TEIA AT SPRING HILL D01715 AND Tl!E NEW COMMIRCIAL R/D 9V9TEM At SPRING HILL ILlll!NTARV OCHOOL. BOTH BV9TEMo IMPTY INTO THE PROPERTV NoFlTH OP 11631 • 121ST AVE SE. MOST OP THe WAT!R 8HEn FLOWS ACR088 THE ~ROP!RTY TO A DITCH WHICH iMPTV'<I INTO A DITCH ON THE WEST IIDi OF 121$T Ave &E. THERE APPeARS TO HAVE QEEN AN exlBTINO DITCH ON EA9YMAN'8 PROP!RTV WHICH HAS BIEN FILLED. THIS DITCH CONVEY FLOWS ,ROM SPRING HILL TO THE W!8T AND MAY Bi A DIVERSION. Tli! OITCH TO THI NORTH HAS NOT BEEN MAINTAINeD ANO MAY NEBO TO BE CLBANUD TO HANDEL FLOWS PROM &PRINQ HILL ANO SPRING HILL !LIMENTARV. PHOtos TAKBN tJ 1 LOOKING EAST ON H 116TH ·er AT NORTH SIDE OP DITCH AT TaDTH AVi H. # 2 LOOKING AT 1D" Olm.ET ON SOUTII 810! OF se UOTH 8T. ORAININQ SOUTH, # o DRAINAGE CH4NN!L ON. NORTll SIDE OP EASTMAN'S PROPERTY, # 4 CATCH BASIN AND INL!T OF FILLED CHANNEL ON NORTH &IOE OF EASTMAN'S PROPERTY, II $ SIGNS OP GROUND WATER/SHEET FLOW FROM eA&TMAN'& PROPERTY: PUMPING CRAWLSPACe. u,FIIN<I HIU. El-lMENTAAY R/0 P~Cll,ITY SKETCH: ROADSID~ DllCH SE 196TH ST 0-------1>--<1--STANDING WATER IN DITCH SPRINO HII.I. AID Dt1f1J I I I I tt I ' .... -,::, \ I \ 'V :.:; D ~ -----------f BLOCKED BY US DRAINAGE CHANNEi. 1 / /:. ~ f o.:O 'r~:r> c~••••L · · · · · · ')a · -:-A / FrLLED IN MOUSl / BY US ~ '0 "' I , OROUNO WAT!R L ___ j-~~ ....... --;_r, 4® w in ,... N ... SE 197TH PL SPRINGS OSHORN l'ROPERTV ?.____..., ---~ I •• I I I I I I , ... IC~) I I I I I I I I I ll'ROM• DATE, SUBJECT: Glenn lilvans Larry Gettle December 19, 1997 Eastman, Marie 97-1550 19631 121st Avenue Southeast This drainage problem has prior review and investigation by Gary R, .. ·.<The properties downstream from the new Spring Hill Elementary School are experiencing continued flooding problems, The previous complaints, during const:i:-uction of the school, were referred to ODES. It appears PDES has signed off.on the _development so the problem is know ours. The downstream conveyance .system, through private properties appears to be inadequate. Some filling of the e~isting·chami.el has occurred which results in flow bypassing the channel and impacting the Eastman's, The investigatioxi also revealed· some groundwater impacts to the property. I I I I I I I I I I(.) I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10:34AM KC WLRD ~ . Date ofill"estlcation; January 6, 1998 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: ND.AP Evaluation for Complaint# 97-15SO MarieEarunan J 9631 121 11 Avenue SE Renton, WA. 98058 Day P 253-939·9448 Eve P 253-852-2448 Background N0.508 P.22/26 Ms. Eastman ·has had flooding problems over the last several years. She has Jived in her home since 1964. Water has gathered under her house and has required Ms. Easunan to tum her furnace off and rely on space heaters to keep the hoa.1e warm. It has added an additional financial burden on her fixed income, Most of her flooding problems has come as a result of a new development (Spring Hill) and the new buildings at the Kent Middle School north of 196"'. Findings Brian Sleight and myself met with Ms. Eastman at the site in the morning. It wa5 raining at the time of the visit. Water was actually flowing across the front and back yards of the lot. It was about 3-S inches deep in most places. One cannot walk anywhere in the yard without boots on. We also looked at the property to the south (Osborn, 95..0974) and found water was freely flowing at the property line. ln several locations on the Osborn.property, water was bubbling out of the lawn. Mr. Osborn had installed a pipe on the property line to intercept the water but it WilS not sufficient to handle the surface flow and not deep enough to intercept the groundwater flow. The sow-ce of most of the water is actually from three sources. Spring Hill Development, the Kent Hill Middle school and the Spring Hill RID D-9171 S. All three of these sources end up in t!te area north and in Ms. Eastman's lot. · The Spring Hill pond is in a registered wetland: It flows to 196"' and then east. Sec drawing. The Kent Middle School runoff flows south from the school grounds to a driveway entrance on 196"'. It flows 10 a control structure just 30 feet east of the driveway. There the flows are split east and south, We pulled the manhole and found the main flow is going south and the overflow lo the east. We found a · · cement bag in the outlet of the pipe flowing south. This restricted flows by about 75%. This obstruction was causing the east pipe to flow at half full at the time of our inspection. The south flow meets up with the RID pond flow al the south pipe outlet and this combination flows south through the back of the property Mnh of Eastman. There ls a drainage ditch behind the Easunan propeny. It flows south to north. This water meets with the southbound flows from the first two sources. This combined flow turns east and flows between the Eastman property and the property to the north. It outlets onto 121". At this point it flows south in open ditch and pipe to the middle of the Osborn lot. Al this point, it flows east again lo a ditch. This area has also e1<perienccd frequ•nt flooding during nominal storm events ( 10 year and less). There was an additional drainage ditch closer to the Enstmon home, but Ms. Eastman stated the neighbor to the north filled It in two years ago. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I FEB.12.2004 10:35AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.23/26 ~ water in the ditches was about mid leg high. Brian and I got a shovel from Roads Malntainence and Brian W8$ able to plug severul areas.where the ditches W!lre spilling onto the Eastman property. Brian was very willing to get in there and help her out in this mauer. He did the best he could with limited m11terials. I have marked the map with the comment "filled bv us" to indicate the two areas we tried to block water from going onto her property. Impact Store ~ 520. Option, and l>iscussion • Flooding or erosion • Flooding • Affects mainly private property • Yes • Cauud by more than one adjoining single family parcel or not a code violation • Yes and No • Causedbylaterupstreamdevelopment -Yes, Yes, Yes Tbere are several short term and Ions term solutions to this problem. I will address the long term first. I. Get a crew out to the &ite to dig and clear out the ditch to the north. It would take about a day to clean the debris arid shore up several of the banks to l(eep the water in the ditch. 2. Ms. Eastman should install guuer pipes to carry tho water away from the house. Right now, they roof drains empty directly below t~ house. Long Tetm I: First and foremost, this should be a study. 2. The study should address the following solutions • Establish a better flowing drainage ditch on the south side of l96<ll. • Clean out the ditch on the north side of i 96<h. • lllstall a drainage system around the Eastman horn~ • Install another drainage ditch between the Eastmlln nnd Osborn homes. • Look into a permanent solution to the drainage problems in front of the Osbom home. This should be looked at 11s a Roads problem. Proposed Solution We should get a Special Operations crew to the site to clean the drainage ditch noith of the Eastman home ASAP. Currently, she cannot use her furnace because it is under water. She is relying on electric heaters (the gas furnace hns to be turned ofi) which really cut into n vecy limited income. It should also be noted that if the power went out, she would be without heat and she is in her 70' s. For the long run, I feel this should be turned into a study. Priority Score'." NIA I I I I I I I I I If ) I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10:35AM KC WLRD N0.508 P.24/26 . . . . . · · . S6/6T/6. JO 0S'f smsva ia:n1v.1-NoN CrNV .r.a!:>UVJ. ·dYaN. l: . ''r 1·r,::r 10 T , .. ;. 1,,....,.. . Hey Lpren, Reinke, Gary.Paul Tuesday, January 20, 1998 1 :51 PM Nett. Loren . · Shular, Ryan; Evans, Glenn; Gettle, Larry Spring HIii Elementary This is just a follow up on our dlscusslon·1ast week. I need to place a note in the tile I was wondering if you ha\/8 any lime table on getting the flow restrlctor Installed at th Et Type II we discussed last week. I haw finished a report on the Marie Eastman complaint and haw requested we refer her complaint to LDSU's Stew Foley who Is in charge of NDAP studies. He will assign a pool engineer to the complaint and that engineer wffl attempt to come up with a permanent solution. In the meantime, we an, trying to come up with some relief for Ms. Eastman. She has approximately 3•5 lnchas of water running through her yard 24 hours a day and has not been able to use her gas furnace for _about 2 months now. Let me know If there Is something I can do from my end. Please keep me Informed of any other progress, thanks for your time gpr Page 1 I I, i I I I· I I I I I -. ) t I I I I I I I I I FEB.12.2004 10:36AM KC WLRD EVans,Glenn Wednesday, January 21, 1998 11 ;31 AM Reinke, Gary.Paul · RE: Marie Eastman Use Project# 2Cl789 From: SO/It: To: CG: CubJact: Hey Glenn, Reinke, Gary.Paul Wednaeduy, Jenuorv 21, 1998 11 :22 AM E1111ne, Glenn Nott, Loren: Shular, Ryan Mario EaotJMn N0.508 P.25/26 o:.u !Iii NII I Just finished spe11king with Loren Nett. He said the contractor Is starting fabrication of the flow control device but Is not sure of the compleUon date. Loren, to his ctedit, tried to Install some sandbags In the south culvert to stop the .flow but the water In the CB was too high and the culwrt was running almost full. He. wnl keep us posted, · On the· other front, I spoke with Jamey from Clean ,Service Company, Inc. and he stated he can open a new d~ch on Marie Eastman's property in one day and stay within I/le confines of the monetary limits of the Quick FD< program. I have already contacted Marte and she saic:I a was okay to proceed. A plus about this Is the current stream is also on her property so we won, have to worry about the neighbor. Jamey will use the spon to form a berm between the eldsting channel and the new one. Can you send a PO# to me for this ?? Any questions ?? gpr Page 1 I I , ,~ I I I I I I 10 I I I I 11 I I I { ' .. I FEB.12.2004 10:36AM KC WLRD' N0.508 ,. KING COUNTY WATER and LAND RESOURCE$ DIVISION LOCAL DRAINAGE SERVICES UNIT INTERNAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1998 TO: Steve Foley FROM: ~lerui Evans SUBJECT: 97-1550, EASTMAN 19631121" Ave SE Please look at this as a study. There are a multitude of mess-ups here; not the least of which is a •control" structure that has no restrictor in it, Basically, it looks as though some diversion of flow from the system installed by Spring HiU Elementary a few years ago may be in order; lfit won't exacerbate anf presumed downstream problems. As it is, the water is impacting Mrs Eastman's house to the point that she can't use her heat through much of the yeilf. We are (even as I write) expecting Loren Nett at DOES to somehow block the unrestricted outlet, sending most of the offending water out through an overflow; we are also constructing a ditch to dewater a portion of the Eastman back yard toward the open ditch road system as a Quick Fix ... Gary is.honchoing this with Clean Services. I I In I I I I I I I, ) I I I I I I I I ~ TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION · A fieid inspection· was conducted on January 30, 2004 to inspect the onsite drainage system of the site. Offsite drainage systems were also inspected downstream approximately 1/4 mile(s) from the discharge point of the site. The inspection involved investigation of the ten specific items of a Level 1 Inspection per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998. The inspection yielded the following findings: 1. Some debris and litter was observed in ditches, culverts, and around trash racks. This could potentially cause flooding problems in the future. The drainage complaints referred to in Task 2 appear to be resolved, but Complaint 2001-0360 wasn't available. 2. Most of the existing drainage system capacity was adequate. Debris and litter could potentially limit the capacity of some of the drainage system if not removed. 3. Drainage complaints showed a history of flooding problems along the south side of SE 196th Street, east of 1201 h Ave. SE. A drainage study and recent · repairs appear to have solved most of the problems. Complaint 2001°0360 was not available to conclude if a problem still exists. Debris in some of the facilities could cause flooding if not removed 4. There were no existing or potential sedimentation, scouring or bank sloughing problems. 5. No significant destruction of aquatic habitat or organisms was noticeable. 6. Qualitative data such as land use, impervious surfaces, topography, and soil types was noted and can be found in Task 4 information. 7. Information was collected on pipes, ditches, and structures. This information is also included in the Task 4 information. 8. Tributary basins delineated in Task 1 were verified. 9. The neighbor located east of the project site at 11806 SE 192"d Street was contacted. He had concerns of sheet runoff entering his property from our site. He has had problems with sheet flow from the project site in the past. It appears that he also has a groundwater problem. 10. The weather conditions at the time of the inspection were cool and cloudy with showers. ,I I,~ I~.) I I I I I I liJ I I I I I I I I\ I from Spring Hill Subdivision, the Spring Hill RID D-91715, and Glen Ridge Elementary School (formerly Spring Hill). They also had groundwater problems · and blocked drainage channels. · · I .() I I I I I I I I ( -J I ii I I I I I I I ; I TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS I •n I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I I r ) '-' I TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS Site Drainage This project is located at 11634 SE 192"d Street in Renton, Washington. It lies along the north side of SE 192nd Street and is approximately 2.25 acres. The property will be divided into nine residential lots. All lots will gain access from SE 192nd Street via a new sub-access street. There is an existing house, three driveways, a concrete pad and two sheds located in the southwest portion of the property, while the rest of the.property portion consists mainly of grass, some brush and some trees. The existing site drainage sheet flows from the west to.the east. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. Soils on this site consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, O to 6 percent slope (AgB). Offsite Drainage An Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table is provided on the next page that describes in detail the offsite drainage components at least Y. mile downstream from the project discharge location. Please refer to the offsite drainage map in Task 1 because the map symbols listed in the table correspond to drainage component symbols on the offsite drainage maps. '-/ -' OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Basin: 5ao.:S Cree IS Subbasln Name: "-l/lo o' -320' I ¥\0!\~ I Jl"IO<'\e. e. C\., :5 --r 2.-12% 3Z;' -lb'&> I A It a"' 2.C., ,, n% /b'oi/ -17z.o' 6,,-,crdt If-c ~2"/,, /7z.o' -I~' ,_ .. - -2 1/6 ' I /~o -tC[f/O 5.,.;c,..,1€.. I z .V,CH , t, . ,.,.~,, ~ r, ' e.to t, ,rf V\e r £f11.~1.c. "'"'/'.lrlC..~ ~ 0 /"f'fo --7 Ar:J, ,Alp_}' e,·a~iQ" C 0 , I Subbasln Number: L1Table.doo 1112192 . .-.,. \ ·-' ------------------- ' / Basin: 65 Cree OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Subbasln Name: liililliii!!IJIJI 111ililti11i\liliill~lill1lll:ltlii'' . ···-··. . ...• , .. _ . .,_,..... . ........ , •...• •.w...-,w,,w,"'='·'·'-"''·'·'"''· , .. ,,,,,e,-,.,s·.·. '•'·"'"'-'·"·""cC::C:• .•,-,,.:.•c.•e,.,•.:.,c.,·c,n·.:c.c·,:.,·, A, z· "'' "'~ ,t.·;, ""~p 0 I ;;,c,rn <. ....... 'S f"o:7:.,-,c I -,1 ... zolo lj., s· IS J·; ~Afer =J. I· Ji io ~ 5 4 t~c. { f 0v-II 1 f( Az. -i.2% o'·3Zo 1 V>Oll e.. ,1 0 '> e. Cft'IP ...... ,ro 'JliJ' ·37o' 5woo. le. -2% '3f(o' ·57!/ ' I Subbasln Number: C,!C ~~ '3' C'ovk Co. u..."5' t! . I J• cfk,r '(' '"" •: ,1 o ~ro{>fe.v,;,$ ' I , (')b ~vve.o ___ O.."' c I rH.1:.:,. vi.:t;.-.,.-_., r-,· :i{o' ~"''lt ;~ II"• I. • o0( ~2"/, ~10 · o... bu. I,.. :II! I ro"'5Jt. c..-/-:o ... I Fl;.J.; ~ i;.,. nL<> fi..~ ... t,d:Je~ .BY j;5 Bb '87 ti i>1 /!>10 Gt I r-..· '-' 8~ 0$111/o,, (e. 21.,/ 1 I P;pe Po..-. 1-t'' c.PG() 1 () 9oo' · '?00 1 no"{. I cf o 8'm' ~ 1'3/o' I I 0( 1110' · /Yu/ ! .~ ~, () I t.1201 • 1/f.iJ1 .'i°lo I i..t3o' · t1ild cJIJ/o -..zfo 1600 1 -'> l/l(;,-1 e.. r'.'J '-' ------------ ros~;p ~ 5 1 ' f· co;. t,,c-,o fbS'i ... {O"sfr:cf ;""' no11< L1Table.doc 1112/92 ,..-.\ -~/ ------- I I 0 I I I I I I I 1-c) I I 11 ! I I I I -' .\_) I TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS. I I --n I - •• ' I I I I I · -> l __ I I I I I I I I I TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS After a thorough field inspection and a detailed resource review there were no some existing problems identified. The debris observed in some of the downstream facilities should be removed. The past drainage problems southeast of Glen Ridge Elementary should monitored and repaired as needed. The proposed improvements will not produce a significant impact to the existing drainage patterns once the site has been stabilized and the runoff has been controlled via a combined detention/wet vault. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be created at the final design stage to minimize the transport of sediment laden runoff to the downstream conveyance system. · I •n I .. I I I I I I 10 I I ' I I I I ! J 1- I APPENDIX THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT AND PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS I ,. i) I I I I I I I I (-. ) I I I I I I I I I' ) THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT The below figures represent the impervious surface calculations for this project. · Developed impervious: 8 new homes & driveways @ 2500 each New road, sidewalks & frontage improvements Existing home & new driveway Total 20,000 sf 15,800 sf 1,850 sf 37,650 sf Per Section 1.1.2, this project qualifies for Full Drainage Review. Both water quality and flow control facilities are required .. A combined detention/wet vault will be provided for this project for both flow control and water quality. ,I I,,_) Ii. I I I I I I I ( ) \ I I I I I I Ii I I PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS PREDEVELOPED FLOWS +-Land Use Summary-------------------------------------------+ : Till Forest O. 00 acres lTill Pasture 2.21 acres \ Till Grass O. 00 acree l Outwash Forest O. 00 acres : Outwash Pasture O. 00 acres :outwash Grass 0.00 acres :wetland 0.00 acres : Impervious O .15 acres :---·--------------------------------------------------------: Total Area: 2.36 acres I , Scale Factor : 1. 00 Hourly Reduced : :------------------------------------------------------------: Time Series: PREDEV ' ' :------------------------------------------------------------: Compute Time ·serie·s Modify User Input +-----------------------------------------------------·------+ Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:predev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.180 2 2/09/01 15:00 0.338 1 100.00 0.990 0.090 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.180 2 25.00 0.960 0.180 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.180 3 10.00 0.900 0.047 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.171 4 5.00 o. 800 0.103 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.163 5 3.00 0.667 0.171 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.103 6 2.00 0.500 0.163 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.090 7 1.30 0.231 0.338 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.047 8 1.10 0.091 <;omputed Peaks 0.285 50.00 0.980 I'. IC> I I I I I I I I ( ) ( I ! I I I I ,, I I I DEVELOPED FLOWS +-Land Use Sununary-----------------.--------------------------+ :Till Forest O, 00 acres· !Till Pasture 0.00 acres !Till Grass 1.50 acres :outwash Forest 0.00 acres lOutwash Pasture 0.00 acres :outwash Grass 0.00 acres :wetland 0.00 acres :Impervious 0. 86 acres :------------------------------------------------------------ ' ' Total Area : . Scale Factor : 2.36 acres 1.00 Hourly Reduced :------------------------------------------------------------ Time Series: DEV :-------------------------------·----------------------------: ' ' Compute Time Series Modify .User Input +------------------------------------------------------------+ Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:dev. tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.342 5 2/09/01 2:00 0.724 1 100.00 0.990 0.252 7 1/05/02 16:00 o. 418 2 25. 00 0.960 0.418 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.360 3 10.00 0.900 0.242 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.351 4 5.00 0.800 0.299 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.342 5 3.00 0.667 0.360 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.299 6 2.00 0.500 0.351 4 10/26/06 0:00 0.252 7 1. 30 0.231 o. 724 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.242 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.622 50.00 0.980 I '. /) •• ·I I I I I / I I , ) • I I I I 1, I "' I I 1· Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Facility Length: Vault. 59.82 59.82 3578 sf 5.00 100.00 17892 cf 5.00 12.00 2 Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Orifice ff 1 2 Height (ft) 0.00 3.75 Diameter (in) 0.99 3. 03· Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage (ft) 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.38 0.48 0.58 0. 68 o. 78 0.88 0.98 1. 08 1. 18 1. 28 1. 38 1. 48 1. 58 1. 68 1. 78 1. 88 1. 98 2.08 2.18 2.28 2.38 2. 48 2.58 2. 68 2.78 Elevation (ft) 100.00 100.01 100.02 100.03 100.04 100.05 100.06 100.07 100.08 100.18 100.28 100.38 100.48 100.58 100.68 100. 78 100.88 100.98 101. 08 101.18 101.28 101.38 101.48 101. 58 101.68 101.78 101.88 101.98 102.08 102.18 102.28 102.38 102. 4 B 102.58 102.68 102.78 Storage (cu. ft) 0. 36. 72. 107 .. 143. 179. 215. 251. 286. 644. 1002. 1360. 1718. · 2075. 2433. 2791. 3149. 3507. 3865. 4222. 4580. 4938. 5296. 5654. 6012. 6369. 6727. 7085 .. 7443. 7801. 8159. 8516. 8874. 9232. 9590. 9948. ft ft 116'x31'=3596 sf provided ft ft 116'x31'x5'=17980 cf provided ft inches Full ·ttead Discharge (CFS) 0.060 0.278 Pipe Diameter (in) Discharge (ac-ft) (cfs) 0.000 0.000 0.001· 0.003 0.002 0.004 O. 002 · 0. 005 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.006 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.015 0.011 0.023 0.014 0.031 0.017 0.039 0.019 0.048 0.020 0.056 0.022 0.064 0.024 0.072 0.025 0.081 0.027 0.089 0.028 0.097 0.029 0.105 0.030 0.113 0.032 0.122 0.033 0.130 0.034 0.138 0.035 0 .146 0.154 0.163 0.171 0.179 0 .187 0.196 0.204 0.212 0.220 0.228 0.036 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.040 0.041 0.041 0.042 0.043 0.044 0.045 6.0 Percolation (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I -· () I I I- I I I I IC) -· I' I -. I· I I I I Ir-) I \ Hyd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2.88 102.88 2.98 102.98 3.08 103.08 . 3.18 103.18 3.28 103.28 3.38 103.38 3.48 103.48 3.58 103.58 3.68 103.68 3.75 103.75 3.78 103.78 3.81 103.81 3.84 103.84 3.88 103.88 · 3. 91 103.91 3.94 103.94 3.97 103.97- 4.00 104.00 4.10 104.10 4.20 104.20 4.30 10.4. 30 4.40 104.40 4.50 104.50 4.60 104.60 4. 70 104.70 4.80 104.80 4.90 104.90 5.00 105.00 Inflow Outflow Target Cale 0.72 0.34 0.34 0.34 *****"** 0.22 0.35 ******* 0.17 0.42 ******* 0.13 0.36 ******* 0.07 ·o. 30 ******* 0.05 0.25 ****"** 0.04 0.24 ******* 0.03 10306. 0.237 0.046 0.00 10663. 0.245 0.046 0.00 11021. 0.253 0.()47 0.00 11379. 0.261 0.048 0.00 11737. 0.269 o. 049 0.00 12095. 0.278 0.049 0.00 12453. 0.286 0.050 0.00 12810. 0.294 0.051 0,00 13168. 0.302 0.05l 0.00 13419. 0.308 0.052 0.00 13526. 0.311 0.054 0.00 13633. 0.313 0.062 0.00 13741. 0.315 0.074 0.00 13884. 0.319 o.·090 0.00 13991. 0. 321 0.109 0.00 14099. .0.324 0.134 0.00 14206. 0.326 0.160 0.00 14313. 0.329 0.179 0.00 14671. 0.337 0.202 0.00 15029. 0.345 0.222 o.oo 15387. 0.353 0.241 0.00 15745. 0.361 0.257 0.00 16102. 0.370 0.273 o.oo 16460. 0.378 0.287 0.00 16818. 0.386 0.301 0.00 17176. 0.394 0.314 0.00 17534. 0. 403 0.326 0.00 17892. 0.411 0.338 0.00 Peak Storage Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 4.99 104.99 17871. 0. 410 4.21 104.21 15073. 0.346 3.99 103.99 14283. 0.328 3.94 103.94 14085. 0.323 3.84 103.84 13740. 0.315 2.87 102.87 10273. 0.236 2 .14 102.14 7662. 0.176 1.15 101.15 4127. 0.095 I I I I I I I IQ I I I I I I I \ WETPOND CALCULATIONS The following calculation. is pei:: Section 6. 4. r of 'the KCSWDM·. Runoff Volume= Vr = (0.9Ai + 0.25Atg + O._lOAtf + O.OlAo) x (R/12) Ai=37650 sf Atg=65151 sf Atf=O Ao=O R=. 47 Vr = [ (0.9) (37650) + (0.25) (65151) + 0 + OJ x (.47/12) = 1965 cf Wetpool Volume Vb = f (Vr) f=3 Vr=l965_-cf Vb= 3xl965 = 5895 cf Wetpool volume=. 116'x3l'x3.0' = 10788 cf, thus satisfying the volume required. I I '1-, \ . I I I I I I I I ,~) I I I I I I I ' ) I . -~ 11 \ 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN I I 4.0 ,n I I I I I I lo I I I I I I I 11 \ ) \ I \ FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Existing Site Hydrology The existing site consists mostly of undeveloped pasture type land. The site contains one drainage basin. The existing site contains approximately 0.20 acre of impervious area and 2.05 acres of till pasture. Runoff sheetflows to the southeast portion of the site, where it enters an open ditch and is conveyed to the east through a series of driveway culverts and enclosed drainage pipes, eventually discharging into Soos Creek. B. Developed Site Hydrology Based on the existing site hydrology, runoff will be collected in an enclosed drainage system and conveyed into a combined detention/wet pond near the southeast property line. All runoff will be treated, detained, and discharged at the natural location. The proposed drainage basin will consist of 1.16 acres of till grass and 1.09 acres of impervious surfaces. This area will be treated and detained in the stormwater system. C. Performance Standards Pursuant to the 1998 KCWSWDM, Level 2 Flow Control and Basic Water Quality Treatment will be applied. D. Flow Control System Detention storage will be placed above the wet pond dead storage elevation. The King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) methodology was used to meet the volume outflow design requirements for Level 2 Flow Control. The pond will discharge via a multiple orifice flow restrictor. The pond will detain approximately 16,100 cubic feet of stormwater with a live storage depth of 2.8 feet. E. Water Quality System For this site, a wet pond has been designed to capture and transform pollutants. The wet pond is a two-cell system separated by a berm. The design provides for a 4-foot dead storage depth with a I-foot minimum sediment storage. The req~ired volume and surface area of the wet pond are 6,478 cubic feet and 2,688 square feet, respectively. 11614.004.doc 86~l-69C (Slv) V'fv'NIHl 'v'8 'v'll~8'v'HS :JO:! ll81HX3 SNOlllONO~ ONl1SIX3 00 z 0 = I= = 0 z 0 0 0 z = r 00 = >< w 0 LO II ~ ..... 0 0 0 Lfl ,, ,. ,·, ., I I ,, I I I :e1111 --- V/N 10:i!t.19/\ ,m;=i.i 1o+uoZ!JOH :e10:is , . . . ·~ ~ a+oa S3:JIA~3S 1V1N3~NO~IAN3 ·~NIAJA~ns ~,>\!lH3 Dtv, T'o-L-· ~~ ~> '~NINN\fld ON\fl '~Nl~33Nl~N3 llAl:J -~ ?ti' ~dH pBAOJddy ' '1-~ 0 X'v'J Z9L9-l SZ(SZv) :. " 1aa4s ~dH pe)\:ie4:) ~ ~ UMDJQ zzzg-,sz(szv) i, a, vL9LL Zl:096 \fM '1N3~ ~ ~ Al"l:) p;,u5!StlQ HlnOS 3nN31W ONZL s,zg, ~/)'1\-1':)~ .mqwnN qor / --- -- ,......_ ~ .. '-----',/.,.-... ___________________________ , --------------------------.------' --· ----..;::_ ------------... --------- -----... ----------------------------------------'---...,.............. ~..'...-,··,.·.------, _l 1> ~.,i:?; ::-:;:] :~:•] ;~1 :,, }. . .,_ ~~~ .,. '~ 1, ~ t1, i I C ~; l~J Job Number 11614 Sheet 2 2 --Of-- I I I I -.~ '!' ;g ~~ '.,.f: .. , ' \._/ ~ .~\ ;i. ui N01'ZO'JS"t 297.26'(C~LCi) \i . .. \_ ·-.</ ..• -. ... ··-···---········· : -··· -"·-·-·-. ,.. --·~··-· ;~y ': ,.'----~:---.~: ;!-·;:~£~·--...,-· .. · '7\ ~-: ~•·., \Cl; fk;,,,, __ .. j -, I )•' .. ., .. ':\l(; .,.~. :fi~; . J .... ~T·· r..,._.,,iJ.'F;~:-. ,'0··.:· . ',· ~ \\7l· 11~· ,_, ,. ,,--·-·--u t:··-•. , .. --·r?~) y',\ l!~) ;~ (1 ~:2 :~/:.<.·:·}~ .. · .. j ·.\ ·r/:L~-.;j ·:_ __ ~ b )) :t r·.:t:?.l'.mtr(·:·-J ,:,~_~;; :II 7' l ., ""' ~-- ·\ \ ___ ,_\ ..... ...... 1~. ·-·-,.,,.., __ "'·"'·•···· ··-. .. I\) ··- (£) CJ ... ' r ::1 1····. ··'1 () }(<.> ~t ,~., , ... \ !'" ,_: ·/.>'"> 0) o, .;;,:-,t;. -··-- .I>, .J '-I i __ .,., I ;:.i . .::.t- 0, i '·I he ~; .t ':'i~~ : g: r.o 1~; :l.....r~ . >.~ 'it: r,f : ~:n ... -~ ·~ ~ .. ·1 ' ~;JJ l !~E : '2' I "'ii ,~·, Soo' 2 ?: \)., '. C ~ ,,,,)')'> ' "'-',~ l~', Ol [c, ~ c;\; ~~ ;:, ....... ,10{< :·:::::.0 ~ft t~f{ }!1i ;\\~, ; ·.·· ·· · --\ T t· ~i ~""'I--~,, I x•rt ·\... -~ 1>'::<·":'2 ······~····,!'.l4··· )\if'/ ' .,/ ,:}" ,,., ;;.,,,, :·<.----·· S01'20'26"W 296.JO'(CALC'D) I : .. >( ·--.......... =f_0··-::;:· 0--·=··· S01'18'06''W 296.JS'(PLAT) ~~ ', 1,(, -1-1-uo oomz -f -f :51 (/) l>l>=-rrorrl )>-C ::IJ s: (/) m-ul> l> m ::o II ~m co-l> .00 0 II oco, 0(/)0 00 )> 0, (/) ::IJ I\) "llmco II )> (/) f') II ""Jl I\) .i::,.. II 01_~::::::: )> .i::,.. 0, 0 ~)> ' <O (/) f) ,, .!!. g )> f) ,. (,~ ,.-) Designed CMV I ~~ }~\ " .. ':t\ ''-.. 504 {>'·'-\,;;. <;·Y~r -~\ -;~. /'\ ,. ,:,;, ., ., No. Dote I By I Ckd. I Appr. Scale: Title: 0 "' en en 0 0 0 ..... ~ II 0, 0 Revision 0 m < m r 0 iOJ m 0 0 0 z 0 = 9 = 0 z (j) m >< I = OJ = =i ~G HA(J,S, 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH ll)'(' \ KENT. WA 98032 Drnwo DMH I Horizontal DEVELOPED CONDITIONS EXHIBIT ( 425 )251 -6222 ~ "'. (425)251-8782 FAX 0 fi .,. ' "'c;. o,· CIVIL ENGINEERING, LANO PLANNING. ( ~,,_ ~"'"''l-SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES GENG\ Checked HPG Approved HPC I Do\e ~I 1"=50' Vertical N/A For: SHARMILA RATHINAM (425) 369-2198 File: P:\ 11 OOOs\ I _1614\exhibil\ 116 I 4-EX3.dwg Date/Time: 02/23/2005 08:44 Scale: 1 =50 dholstod Xrefs: z11614-s,z 11614-t, I I . n I I I I I I I I CJ I I I I I • I I ) KCRTS Corrunand CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series 11614PRE.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 l11Rl4 Le,ve,I ·z_. -vi ow Cv~ I u~:?,-oif- Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTP60R.rnf Till Pasture 2. 05 acres Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 0.20 acres Total Area 2.25 acres Peak Discharge: 0.344 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:11614PRE.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Corrunand Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Corrunand Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Loading Stage/Discharge curve:11614pre.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:11614pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:11614PRE.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location: Sea-Tac Computing Series 11614DEV.tsf Regional Scale Factor: 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf 1.16 acres Till Grass Impervious Loading-Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC~DATA\STEI60R.rnf 1.09 acres I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I L _) Total Area : 2.25 acres Peak Discharge: 0.760 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:11614DEV.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:11614dev.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:11614dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:11614DEV.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence Loading Time Series File:11614pre.tsf Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:11614TARGET.dur Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Edit Facility Loading Time Series File: 11614dev. tsf Time Series Found in Memory:11614dev.tsf I I I I I I I I I n Io I I I I I I I CJ I \. \ Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:11614pre.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.179 3 2/09/01 15:00 0.098 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.184 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.060 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.105 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.176 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.166 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.344 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks 11614PRE.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.344 1 100.00 0.990 0.184 2 25.00 0.960 0.179 3 10.00 0.900 0.176 4 5.00 0.800 0.166 5 3.00 0.667 0.105 6 2.00 o. 500 0.098 7 1.30 0.231 0.060 8 1.10 0.091 0.291 50.00 0.980 Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I \ I \ (' , l Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:11614dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.367 0.285 0.445 0.293 0.356 0. 389 0.426 0.760 Peak Flow Rates--- Rank Time of Peak 5 8 2 7 6 4 3 1 2/09/01 2:00 1/05/02 16:00 2/27/03 7:00 8/26/04 2:00 10/28/04 16:00 1/18/06 16:00 10/26/06 0:00 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks (J L._) 11614DEV.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.760 1 100.00 0.445 2 25.00 0.426 3 10.00 0.389 4 5.00 0.367 5 3.00 0.356 6 2.00 0. 293 7 1. 30 0.285 .8 1.10 0.655 50.00 Page 1 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 o. 500 0.231 0.091 0.980 I I n 1' I I I I I I •c) I I I I I I Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Pond Side Slope: 2.00 H:lV Pond Bottom Length: 118. 00 ft Pond Bottom Width: 40.00 ft Pond Bottom Area: 4.720. sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 7353. sq. ft 0.169 acres Effective Storage Depth: 2.80 ft Stage O Elevation: 498.20 ft Storage Volume: 15811. cu. ft 0. 363 ac-ft Riser Head: 2.80 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) ( in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1. 25 0 .071 2 1. 90 2.10 0 .113 6.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 498.20 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 498.21 47. 0.001 0.005 0.00 0.03 498.23 142. 0.003 0.007 0.00 0.04 498.24 189. 0.004 0.008 0.00 0.05 498.25 237. 0.005 0.010 0.00 0.07 498.27 332. 0.008 0. 011 0.00 0.08 498.28 380. 0.009 0.012 0.00 0.09 498.29 427. 0.010 0 .013 0.00 0.10 498.30 475. 0. 011 0.014 0.00 0.20 498.40 957. 0.022 0.019 0.00 0.30 498.50 1445. 0.033 0.023 0.00 0.40 498.60 1939. 0.045 0.027 0.00 0.50 498.70 2440. 0.056 0.030 0.00 0.60 498.80 2947. 0.068 0.033 0.00 0.70 498.90 3461. 0.079 0.036 0.00 0.80 499.00 3981. 0. 091 0.038 0.00 0.90 499.10 4508. 0.103 0.040 0.00 1. 00 499.20 5041. 0 .116 0.042 0.00 1.10 499.30 5582. 0.128 0.045 0.00 1. 20 499.40 6128. 0.141 0.047 0.00 1.30 499.50 6682. 0.153 0.048 0.00 1. 40 499.60 7242. 0.166 0.050 0.00 1.50 499.70 7809. 0.179 0.052 0.00 1. 60 499. 80 . 8383. 0 .192 0.054 0.00 1.70 499.90 8963. 0.206 0.055 0.00 . 1. 80 500.00 9551. 0.219 0.057 0.00 1. 90 500.10 10145. 0.233 0.058 0.00 1. 92 500.12 10265. 0.236 0.060 0.00 Surf Area (sq. ft) 4720. 4726. 4739. 4745. 4752. 4764. 4771. 4777. 4783. 4847. 4911. 4975. 5040. 5105. 5170. 5236. 5302. 5368. 5435. 5501. 5569. 5636. 5704. 5772. 5841 . 5909. 5979. 5992. I I 1.94 500.14 10385. 0.238 0.064 0.00 6006. n 1. 97 500.17 10566. 0.243 0.070 0.00 6027. I 1. 99 500.19 10686. 0.245 0.078 0.00 6041. 2.01 500.21 10807. 0.248 0.088 0.00 6055. 2.03 500.23 10928. 0.251 0.100 0.00 6069. 2.05 500.25 11050. 0.254 0.108 0.00 6083. I 2.07 500.27 11172. 0.256 0 .111 0.00 6097. 2.10 500.30 11355. 0.261 0 .114 0.00 6118. 2. 20 500.40 11970. 0.275 0.128 0.00 6188. I 2. 30 500.50 12593. 0.289 0.140 0.00 6258. 2.40 500.60 13222. 0.304 0.150 0.00 6329. 2.50 500.70 13858. 0.318 0.159 0.00 6400. 2.60 500.80 14502. 0.333 0.168 0.00 6471. I 2.70 500.90 15153. 0.348 0 .176 0.00 6543. 2.80 501.00 15811. 0. 363 0.184 0.00 6615. 2.90 501.10 16476. 0.378 0.500 0.00 6687. I 3.00 501.20 17148. 0.394 1.070 0.00 6760. 3.10 501.30 17828. 0.409 1. 810 0.00 6833. 3.20 501.40 18515. 0.425 2.600 0.00 6906. 3.30 501.50 19209. 0.441 2.890 0.00 6980. I 3.40 501. 60 19911. 0.457 3.150 0.00 7054. 3.50 501.70 20620. 0.473 3.390 0.00 7128. 3.60 501.80 21336. 0.490 3.620 0.00 7203. 3.70 501.90 22060. 0.506 3.830 0.00 7277. I 3.80 502.00 22792. 0.523 4.030 0.00 7353. 3.90 502.10 23531. 0.540 4.220 0.00 7428. 4.00 502.20 24277. 0.557 4.400 0.00 7504. IC) 4.10 502.30 25032. 0.575 4.580 0.00 7580. 4 .20 502.40 25793. 0 .592 4.740 0.00 7657. 4 .30 502.50 26563. 0.610 4 .910 0.00 7733. 4.40 502.60 27340. 0.628 5.060 0.00 7811. I 4.50 502.70 28125. 0.646 5.210 0.00 7888. 4.60 502.80 .28918. 0.664 5.360 0.00 7966. 4.70 502.90 29718. 0.682 5.510 0.00 8044. I 4.80 503.00 30526. 0.701 5.650 0.00 8122. Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Cale Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) I 1 0.76 ******* 0.50 2.90 501.10 16476. 0.378 2 0.37 0.18 0;18 2.70 500.90 15122. 0.347 3 0.37 ******* 0.15 2.45 500.65 13555. 0 .311 4 0. 39 ******* 0.14 2.29 500.49 12532. 0.288 I 5 0.44 ******* 0.14 2.28 500.48 12498. 0.287 6 0.23 ******* 0.06 1. 79 499.99 9521. 0.219 7 0.29 ******* 0.05 1.29 499.49 6601. 0.152 I 8 0.29 ******* 0.04 0.85 499.05 4237. 0.097 ---------------------------------- I Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:11614dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File: 11614RDOUT I Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.760 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.500 CFS. at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 , ) Peak Reservoir Stage: 2.90 Ft I',_, Peak Reservoir Elev: 501.10 Ft I I I Peak Reservoir Storage: 16476. Cu-Ft ,c) 0.378 Ac-Ft Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:11614rdout.tsf I Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks --Rank Return Prob I (CFS) (CFS) (ft) Period 0.176 2 2/09/01 20:00 0.500 2.90 1 100.00 0.990 0.048 7 12/28/01 17:00 0.176 2.69 2 25.00 0.960 0.138 5 2/28/03 7:00 0.155 2.45 3 10.00 0.900 I 0.039 8 8/26/04 6:00 0.139 2.29 4 5.00 0.800 0.057 6 1/05/05 15:00 0.138 2.28 5 3.00 0.667 0.139 4 1/18/06 22:00 0.057 1. 79 6 2.00 0.500 I 0.155 3 11/24/06 7:00 0.048 1. 28 7 1.30 0.231 0.500 1 1/09/08 10:00 0.039 0.85 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0 .392 2.87 50.00 0.980 I Flow Duration from Time Series File:11614rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 41923 68.368 68.368 31.632 0.316E+OO I 0.007 4459 7.272 75.639 24.361 0.244E+OO 0.012 3357 5.475 81.114 18.886 0.189E+OO 0.017 3308 5.395 86.508 13.492 0.135E+OO lo 0.022 2653 4.326 90.835 9.165 0. 917E-01 0.027 1670 2.723 93.558 6.442 0.644E-01 0.032 1303 2.125 95.683 4.317 0.432E-01 0.037 873 1.424 97.107 2.893 0.289E-01 I 0.042 682 1.112 98.219 1. 781 0.178E-01 0.047 . 303 0.494 98. 713 1. 287 0.129E-01 0.052 315 0.514 99.227 0.773 0.773E-02 I 0.057 261 0.426 99.653 0.347 0.347E-02 0.062 78 0.127 99.780 0.220 0.220E-02 0.066 14 0.023 99.803 0.197 0.197E-02 0. 071 8 0.013 99.816 0.184 0.184E-02 I 0.076 7 0.011 99.827 0.173 0.173E-02 0.081 1 0.002 99.829 0.171 0 .171E-02 0.086 6 0.010 99.839 0.161 0.161E-02 I 0.091 4 0.007 99.845 0.155 0.155E-02 0.096 3 0.005 99.850 0.150 0.150E-02 0.101 2 0.003 99.853 0.147 0.147E-02 0.106 3 0.005 99.858 0.142 0.142E-02 I 0 .111 10 0.016 99.874 0.126 0.126E-02 0 .116 15 0.024 99.899 0.101 O.lOlE-02 0.121 8 0.013 99.912 0.088 0.881E-03 I 0.125 5 0.008 99. 920 0.080 0.799E-03 0.130 5 0.008 99. 928 0.072 0.718E-03 0 .135 11 0.018 99.946 0.054 0.538E-03 0.140 7 0. 011 99.958 0.042 0.424E-03 I 0.145 3 0.005 99.962 0.038 0.375E-03 0.150 4 0.007 99.969 0.031 0.310E-03 0.155 8 0.013 99.982 0.018 0.179E-03 I( .. ) 0.160 1 0.002 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.165 2 0.003 99.987 0 .013 0 .130E-03 I I I I I I I lo I I I I I I 0.170 3 0.005 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.175 3 0.005 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: 11614pre. tsf New File: 11614rdout. tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.053 0.70E-02 0.69E-02 -1. 9 I 0.70E-02 0.063 0.52E-02 0.21E-02 -58.5 I 0.52E-02 0.073 0.38E-02 0.18E-02 -52.8 I 0.38E-02 0.083 0.27E-02 0.17E-02 -38.7 I 0.27E-02 0.093 0.18E-02 0.15E-02 -12.8 I 0.18E-02 0.103 0.14E-02 0.14E-02 4.8 I 0.14E-02 0 .113 O.lOE-02 0. llE-02 6.5 I O.lOE-02 0.123 0.77E-03 0.80E-03 4.3 I 0. 77E-03 0.134 0.60E-03 0.60E-03 0.0 I 0.60E-03 0.144 0.39E-03 0.38E-03 -4.2 I 0.39E-03 0.154 0.23E-03 0.23E-03 0.0 I 0.23E-03 0.164 0 .13E-03 0 .13E-03 0.0 I 0 .13E-03 0.174 0.98E-04 0.33E-04 -66.7 I 0.98E-04 Maximum positive excursion; 0.006 cfs I 6.0%) occurring at 0.105 cfs on the Base Data:11614pre.tsf and at 0.111 cfs on the New Data:11614rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion; 0.028 cfs (-32.3%) occurring at O. 086 cf.s on the Base Data: 11614pre. tsf and at 0.058 cfs on the New Data:11614rdout.tsf Base New %Change 0.053 0.053 -0.6 0.063 0.054 -13. 7 0.073 0.056 -23.6 0.083 0.058 -30.8 0.093 0.076 -18.6 0.103 0.108 4.6 0 .113 0 .115 1. 9 0.123 0.126 2.2 0.134 0.134 0.5 0.144 0.143 -0.2 0.154 0.154 0.0 0.164 0.167 1.9 0.174 0.169 -2.7 I •n I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I . ( ) ·'-· I Wetpond Sizing Worksheet Summary of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Requirements Project Name: Rathinam Short Plat Project Number: 11614 Step 1) Determine volume factor f. Basic size ............................................ . f= 3 Large size ............................................ . Step 2) Determine rainfall R for mean annual Storm Detemine rainfall R for mean annual storm Rainfall ............................................... .. Step 3) Calculate runoff from mean annual storm V, = (0.9A1 + 0.25A,0 + 0.1 OAtt + 0.01 Ao.,) X R. A, = tributary area of impervious surface A10 = tributary area of till grass Att = tributary area of till forest Aao = tributary area of outwash grass R = rainfall from mean annual storm V, = Volume of runoff from mean annual storm Step 4) Calculate wetpool Volume V0 =.f V, f = Volume Factor V0 = Volume runoff, mean annual atorm V, = Volume of the wetpool Step 5) Determine wetpool dimensions a) Determine geometry of first cell Volume in first cell Depth h 1st cell (minus sed. Storage) Determine horizontal xs area at mid-depth using A mid= Vol. 1st cell/ h Mid-width Mid-length Determine xs area at surface Z = Side slope length ( _H:1 V) 2(h/2 x 2) = Dimensions of top of pond adjusted for geometrics Top width -----f= 4.5 ----- __ o_.o_39 __ (feet) 47,480 (sf) 50,530 (sf) 0 (sf) 0 (sf) 0.039 (feet) 2,159 (cf) 3 2,159 (cf) 6,478 !(cf) 1,943 (cf) 4 (feet) 486 (sf) 22 (feet) 22 (feet) 2 3:1 recommended 8 (feet) 30 (feet) I In I I I I I I I 10 I I • I I 1, I i ) i ' -I I Top length Area of Top b) Determine geometry of second cell Volume in second cell Depth h 2nd cell Determine xs area at mid-depth using A mid = Vol. 2nd cell I h Mid-width Mid-length Determine horizontal xs area at surface Z = Side slope length ( _H: 1 V) 2(h/2 X Z) = Dimensions of top of pond adjusted for geometrics Top width Top length Area of Top Adjustment to cells (If necessary) Geometry check: Overall pond L:W at mid-depth= 3:1 Pond width (mid-depth) Cell 1 length (mid-depth) Cell 2 length (mid-depth) Pond Length (mid-depth) = Cell 1 + Cell 2 Lmid:Wmid= Total Wetpond Surface area required= Total Wetpond Bottom area required= ----"3"'"0 __ (feet) --"'"90_2 __ (feet) 4,534 (cf) 4 (feet) 1,134 (sf) 22 (feet) 51 (feet) 2 3:1 recommended 8 (feet) 30 (feet) 59 (feet) 1785 (feet) 22 22 51 73 3.33 2,688 807 I I() • I D I I I I I() I I I I I I I ! ' . ./ I 'I ' 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN I m '·.) I D I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I 'I '._J I 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Runoff from the project will be collected in a series of catch basins and tightlined to the proposed stormwater facility. The conveyance system is designed in accordance with the 1998 KCWSWDM. Specifically, the system is sized to adequately convey the 25-year post-development event conveyance calculations can be found within this section of the Technical Information Report. 11614.004.doc I I I I I I I lo I I I I I I I BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES Pipe data from file:11614bwl00.bwp Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions Tailwater Elevation:501. feet Discharge Range:2.37 to 3.37 Step of 0.1 [cfs] Overflow Elevation:505.79 feet Weir:NONE Channel Width:2. feet vc."'J -to cB s PIPE NO. 1: 34 LF -12"CP @ 13.26% OUTLET: 496.00 INLET: 500.51 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 503.72 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 2.0 Q-RATIO: 0.37 Q (CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 2.37 1. 02 501. 53 * 0.012 0.66 0.28 5.00 5.00 0.66 ***** 1. 02 2.47 1. 05 501.56 * 0.012 0.68 0.29 5.00 5.00 0.68 ***** 1. 05 2.57 1. 09 501.60 * 0.012 0.69 0. 29 5.00 5.00 0.69 ***** 1.09 2,67 1.12 501.63 * 0.012 0. 71 0. 30 5.00 5.00 0. 71 ***** 1.12 2.77 1.16 501.67 * 0.012 0.72 0.31 5.00 5.00 0. 72 ***** 1.16 2.87 1. 20 501. 71 * 0.012 0.73 0. 31 5.00 5.00 0.73 ***** 1. 20 2.97 1.24 501. 75 * 0.012 0.74 0.32 5.00 5.00 0.74 ***** 1.24 3.07 1.28 501. 79 * 0.012 0.76 0.32 5.00 5.00 0. 76 ***** 1. 28 3.17 1. 33 501. 84 * 0.012 0.77 0.33 5.00 5.00 0.77 ***** 1. 33 3.27 1. 38 501.89 * 0.012 0.78 0.33 5.00 5.00 0. 78 ***** 1. 38 3.37 1.43 501. 94 * 0.012 0.79 0.34 5.00 5.00 0.79 ***** 1. 43 3.37 1.43 501.94 * 0.012 0.79 0.34 5.00 5.00 0.79 ***** 1. 43 CB 3 -h, c...B 2- PIPE NO. 2: 168 LF -12 11 CP ,@ 1. 23% OUTLET: 500.51 INLET: 502.57 INTYP: 5. JUNC NO. 2: OVERFLOW-EL: 505.79 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 2.0 Q-RATIO: 0.60 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 1. 73 0.81 503.38 * 0.012 0.56 0.45 1.02 1. 02 0.56 ***** 0.81 1. 80 0.83 503.40 * 0.012 0.58 0.46 1. 05 1. 05 0.58 ***** 0.83 1. 88 0.85 503.42 * 0.012 0.59 0.47 1.09 1. 09 0.59 ***** 0.85 1. 95 0.88 503.45 * 0.012 0.60 0.48 1.12 1.12 0.60 ***** 0.88 2.02 0.90 503.47 * 0.012 0.61 0. 49 1.16 l.i6 0.61 ***** 0.90 2.09 0. 92 503. 49 · * 0.012 0. 62 0.50 1. 20 · 1.20 0.62 ***** 0. 92 2.17 0.94 503.51 * 0.012 O'. 63 0.51 1.24. 1.24 0.63 ***** 0.94 2.24 0. 96 503.53 * 0.012 0.65 0.52 1. 28 1. 28 0.65 ***** 0.96 2.31 0.98 503.55 * 0.012 0.66 0.53 1. 33 1.33 0.66 ***** 0.98 2.39 1. 00 503.57 * 0.012 0.67 0.54 1. 38 1.38 0.67 ***** 1. 00 2.46 1. 03 503.60 * 0.012 0.68 0.55 1. 43 1.43 0.68 ***** 1. 03 2.46 1. 03 503.60 * 0.012 0.68 0.55 1. 43 1. 43 0.68 ***** 1. 03 ~ 2. +c, Ll!:. I PIPE NO. 3: 21 LF -12"CP @ 1.05% OUTLET: 502.57 INLET: 502.79 INTYP: 5 Q(CFS) HW.(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 1.08 0.69 503.48 ·* 0.012 0.44 0.36 0.81 0.81 0.58 0.69 0.61 1.13 0.72 503.51 * 0 :012 0.45 0.37 0.83 0.83 0.61 0.72 0.62 1.17 0.74 503.53 * 0.012 0.46 0.38 0.85 0.85 0.63 0.74 0.64 I I I • I I I I I I I I 1.22 0.76 1.26 0.78 1.31 0.80 1. 35 0.83 1. 40 0.85 1.45 0.87 1.49 0.90 1. 54 0.93 1. 54 0.93 503.55 • 0.012 503.57 • 0.012 503.59 • 0.012 503.62 • 0.012 503.64 • 0.012 503.66 • 0.012 503.69 • 0.012 503. 72 • 0.012 503.72 • 0.012 0.47 0. 39 0.88 0.88 0.65 0.76 0.65 0.48 0.39 0.90 0.90 0.68 0.78 0.67 0.49 0.40 0. 92 0.92 0.70 0.80 0.68 0.50 0.41 0.94 0.94 0.72 0.83 0.70 0.51 0.42 0.96 0. 96 0.75 0.85 0. 71 0.51 0.42 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.87 0.73 0.52 0.43 1. 00 1. 00 0.80 0.90 0.74 0.53 0.44 1. 03 1. 03 0.83 0.93 0.76 0.53 0.44 1. 03 1. 03 0.83 0.93 0.76 I I I D I I IC) I I I I I I I 1'-J I BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES Pipe data from file:11614bwlateral.bwp Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions Tailwater Elevation:501.94 feet Discharge Range:0.18 to 1.18 Step of 0.1 [cfs] Overflow Elevation:503.72 feet Weir:NONE Channel Width:2. feet (.,5 "2;, +t, a3tf PIPE NO. 1: 21 LF -12"CP @ 1. 00% OUTLET: 500.51 INLET: 500.72 INTYP: 5 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 0.18 1. 23 501.95 * 0.012 0.18 0.15 1.43 1.43 1. 23 1. 23 0.23 0.28 1.22 501.94 * 0.012 0.22 0.19 1.43 1.43 1.22 1. 22 0.29 0.38 1. 23 501.95 * 0.012 0.26 0.22 1.43 1.43 1.22 1. 23 0.34 0.48 1. 23 501.95 * 0.012 0.29 0.24 1. 43 1.43 1. 22 1. 23 0.39 0.58 1.24 501. 96 * 0.012 0.32 0.27 1. 43 1.43 1.22 1.24 0.43 0.68 1.24 501.96 * 0.012 0.35 0.29 1. 43 1.43 1. 23 1.24 0.47 0.78 1.25 501.97 * 0.012 0.37 0.31 1. 43 1.43 1.23 1.25 0.51 0.88 1. 26 501.98 * 0.012 0.40 0.33 1.43 1.43 1. 23 1.26 0.55 0.98 1. 27 501.99 * 0.012 0.42 0.35 1.43 1.43 1.23 1. 27 0.58 1. 08 1.28 502.00 * 0.012 0.44 0.37 1.43 1.43 1.24 1. 28 0.61 1.18 1.29 502.01 * 0.012 0.46 0.38 1. 43 1.43 1. 24 1. 29 0.65 --a!! -··~ JOB NAME: nam Short Plot JOB#: 11614 R€V1SED: A· Contributing Meo (Ac) C• Runoff Coeftlciel'lt TC• Hme of Concentration (min) la Intensity at Tc (11/hl') da Diameter of Pipe (In) La Length of PIPe (ff) 0-Water DePth at Qd (11"1) FROM TO A !!II! !!!!!I -111!!1 l!!!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!!!!!I -0 ldngco-100.Kls BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS -PIPE FLOW CAlCULATOR USU"lQ the Rcflonol Method & tv1omlnQ Foonula KING COUN1Y DESIGN FOR 100 YEAR STORM NOTE: ENTER DEFAULTS AND STORM DATA BEFORE BEGINNING DEFAULTS I C.. 0.91 n= 0.013 cl= 12 TC• 6.3 - Qd. Design Flow (Cfs) COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIQNAL METHOD V-EQUATION Qf,. Full CopocifY Flow (Cfs) Vd• Veloclty at Design Flew (fps) Vt .. Velocity ct Full Flow (fps) s,. Slope of pipe(%) nz Manning Roughness Coefflelent Tt. Travel Time at Vd (min) d Tc n C S!O,M A, 2VR LS8 ICJl'R 2.44 25Yll 2,1,6 50l'R 2.75 IOCJl'R 2.61 SUMA I A"C ISUMA"C " 0.58 0,1,, PREC!P .. 3.41 0,65 A,. 2.611 0.65 ,,_ 0.631 0,63 Qd Qt Qd/QI --- 0/d D Vf Vd Tl -~·;;· ·;~;· ··;;··1·;; .. -:;·· ·;~;;· ·;,;-......... -~~;-i-;-;··· -,~;;· ....... .......... =: .. -• ....... = ................. ==== :===== CBl CB2 0.401 0.83 504 11166 0.272 3.27 6.42 4.73 O.Q7 CB2 CB3 0.75 1.32 167 12 6.4 0.013 0.608 1.151 0.46 0.76 2.76 WI ,m 0.510 QSO, 6.07 5.21 5.26 0.53 CBJ POND 0.8.5 16.87 79 12 6.9 0.013 0.618 2.001 0.53 1.28 2.63 3.37 14.63 0.230 0.324 389 18.64 15.10 om CB4 CB3 0.77 2.00 21 12 6.3 0.013 0.5.? 0.77 0.42 0.42 2.78 1.18 5.04 0.23< 0.327 3.93 6.42 5.22 Q.07 POQ81 --~:)-- 1 v'ld ll::IOHS l"f\fNIHl 'v'l::I l::10::1 311::IOl::ld QNV NVld 30\INl\fl::IO V'll::101$ ON\I ONIO\fl::10 -\-··· .... ~-m;- 861Z-69C (SZ17) sioss \IM 'HSIV'l\lVW'l\1$ ·1s Hlm 3S 90017Z V'l\lNll-ll \fl:! \llll"ll::I\IHS \ ' .f , \ (1't1dH£'!1Bi! M..90,BJ,IOS ,01Y.JJ,on1~ A1.l)i!,Ot",1os ' ·.: .... _\. •· • ... ........ ,., . ~--.. --· ···- . ' ,. ' ' 1.'.· ~ •. !! !.· .... _: ___ :_ :_._ . .i. :_._: .. :.: ... _:.:.:_._: _____ ._:_: ___ ) • 'e§ ,,; •• ~-------..---.... ---.-....... -· ... --···------- ~I\OC S3~3S l'l'1N3~NOtlWl3 ':lN~S ~ T'vo .~~.1 '~NINN'l'1d ONV1 '~Nltl33Nl~N3 11/11:l . . iO>!l'°il "'!idR'""POAOJdOf i ~ xv.:1 Z8LB-rsz(,;;zr) • 0 )Ol4S -clclA'" ··~004:, . . Ul9-l\.l{r,;zi,) ~ J,,/IJ '°'"o,,,~>< ,ffitf""" "~"'U ?:(086 VM 'lN]>I 1719U ~p,.,01000 Hln0S 311N3AV ONZL 9 l Z8 l ,s-'>l>'H'D~ •,oos '""'"Noor w " ~ J ~ ;, i 1 i u • ~ ~ § § ~ ?• : ....... ······"··················"·········· . :·:·: .. ..g~: .. ::::.: ... :.: .. :.;.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:· .. · .. :· .. ·.,·. ,,·.,. ' i 1)!!11 :i ii : / .. ://. I ..... :t•······ • .t; :i-/' ., . '/I ... • ' • i ' ' • ... .., ... ; .. JL:i1'······· 1~ ii, •• : . s./,. I BARGHAUSEN DATE: Z. -B-o 5' PAGE_/_OF_(_ CONSULTING ENGINEER: CV I !ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT#:_-_,_-/=I {JI=/=(/.============= IQ) '-...'.._'.PR_::O:_:JE:_:C:_::Ti:_:::S.:::..:UB::_J::_:EC::..:_T:._:: ="-=' :::::'.:~:::\A)::::::::; ::::"'d::::::o:::::::=S::::. ::· ":a......:::'.:~=::::::::::=:·h~4::::N=:::• :::lh=n'.:'.::d=:=~:::::::/r':::f====~ I F:-y' ~-::-~-.~1~tL1 ~:~~---::, -. t lt~ ~t.1,-:~~-~ttr-1 ~ 1 1 1 · w_:__J _ _:____~ I : 1 1 I Ii I I I _J Ii 1 I p.,.__._ \~ __I__S b% <L Ji,,.,,_,, ... .., .. Jbj ''~ .! I I I i I I ·'f t ! i I i i I t--------------········· -------~f4z,t:+:tt -----------+------------1·-f-!----+---- i --------i ~---------~,------1---t-"-i--,- I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ! I 1()1 I ! I I H--t-t--+-+--t---+--+---t--t-1 -+--l;--+--l-+--+--1--t--t--t--+l -+--;-I -j--I I H- I I r , 11+-'-----+I--J-1 -- I I I I I 11-t--t-------~-~I +-I -t-t---t--i-1---~-! -------____ J+-,[---t-, -•--+--+1+ ---~ --e--I I •+--t-+--+--1-,-,--1--1--t-+-,l-+-_,_-+--+-+--+--t-+-<-+l __ l>--i ! I I I I I I I I I 1t--t--+--+-,-+-_ _ I ' _ _ I I _,__ --------------___ , __ '1-1 -t---1---' --------------,--l--f-1-------' __ L_ -1·-t--------- :=--,----------!-·-···· __ -----==----,=1-1---~:··· -·· ----!·· --=--lf:i_:~_J_- 1 r---t-----··· -'1 Lt= --~ -1--~-J--- 1-11--+--t--,--,__ ----I I --,--Ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1(:1 1 I I I I I I i I I I I I I i I I I : I l : I I ' I ! 1 ' I Ir, I I I I I I I 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES I(' ,) I I I I I I I \ ' I .. I I I I I I I I I I 05/20/2005 11:25 4257460860 @ '~~~~~~~~:~~1.t~.~=~~~~ O".onstr,."1lon ·n"$1il\$l I. !CPO i W/\RO lnsrX'd,nn ~lc:rs . . . . May 20, 2005 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 -72"d Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Subject: Dear Mr. Grubb: Mr. Hal Grubb, PE Pavement Design Rathinam Short Plat Southeast 192"" Street near 116"' Avenue Southeast King County, Washington EARTH CONSULTANTS PAGE 02/05 EstahliS\)<'.<1 197S E-11853 As requested, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) is providing a pavement design for the widening of Southeast 192"' Street near 116"' Avenue Southeast. In preparing this design, we visited the site to collect a representative sample of the pavement subgrade materials and conducted a California Bearing Ratio test on the soils. Project Description ECI understands that as part of the site development the north shoulder of Southeast 19 2"' Street will be widened. The widening operation will consist of sawcutting the existing pavement edge and extending the paved area another one to two feet. 1805 1361h Place N.E .. Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643·3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670 Other Locations Fite I • I I I le) I I I I I I 4257460860 . ' Barghausen Consulting.Engineers, Inc. May 20, 2005 Design Values EARTH CONSULTANTS PAGE 03/G5 E-11853 Page 2 Our pavement design is based on a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 4.2 for the soils based our laboratory testing. Traffic design values were obtained from Table 11.3 of the AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1986). For our design, the _street was classified as an urban minor arterial with a corresponding ESAL of 700,000 for a 20-year design life. Pavement Design Widening The AASHTOWARE DARWin Pavement Design and Analysis System program was used to calculate t_he pavement section for the widened section. Input and output parameters are attached. ECl's design indicates the following pavement section can be used for the pavement widening: 0 4.5 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 6 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material over 8.5 inches of gravel base. The gravel base and the CRB should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557, Modified Proctor. The crushed rock base should consist of 1 .5 inches of crushed surfacing top course (CSTC) underlain by crushed surfacing base course (CSBC) to achieve the depth specified above. CSTC and CSBC should conform to the gradation standards in Section 9-03.9(3) of the WSDOT standards. The native materials or structural fill placed for pavement subgrade should be moisture conditioned, graded and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-698 (Standard Proctor) to subgrade elevations below the gravel base material. Additional Services A representative of EC! should be on site to observe the subgrade in the widened section and test the compaction of the existing subgrade, gravel base, and CRB. I I .() I I I • I I le) I I I I I I I Ii ) I 05/20/2005 11:25 4257460860 . . Barghausen Consulting Engineers, tnc. May 20, 2005 EARTH CONSULTANTS EC\ trusts this letter meets your needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULT ANTS, INC. -6/zn/os- . ~c_~,xp=::~::!:! :::S~Q2~.._~..,,,,7--.) Kristina M. Weller, PE Associate Principal Scott b1nkelman Scott D. Dinkelman, LEG Principal KMW/SDO/lap Attachments: DARWin Pavement Design Printouts Plate 1, California Bearing Ratio Test Results co: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Attention: Mr. Hal Grubb, PE PAGE 04/05 E-11853 Page 2 I 1· I I I I lo I I I 1' I I I .1 ) I ... ~ 4257460860 EARTH CONSULTANTS 1993 AASHTO Pavement Design DARWin Pavement Design and Analysis System A Proprietary AASHTOWare Computer Software Product Earth Consultants, Inc, I 805 • 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 BeUcvue, Washington USA Flexible Structural Design Module 18-l<ip llSALs Over Tflitial Perfonnam:e Peiiod Initial ~ility Terminal Serviceability Reliability Level Overall Stand.an! Deviation Roadbed Soll Resilient Modulus Stage Cons1nlciion Calculated Design Structural Number Thickness precision Layer Material ~riP!ion I asphalt concrete 2 crushed rock base 3 gn,vel hose Total Struct Cocf. ~ 0.44 0.13 0.1 l Southeast 192nd Street Flexible Structural Desigim 700,000 4.2 2.7 85% 0.5 6,104psi I 3.56 in Layered Thickness Design Nean:st 0.5 in Drain Spec Min Elastic Coef. Thickness Thiclmcss Modulu, !Mil Olli{iJl.} (DiJ{in} U!ru 1 2 400,000 0.95 6 28,00.0 0.95 8 20,000 Page I Calculated Width Thiclmess {ID lli!} 4.50 6.00 8.50 19.00 PAGE 05/05 Calculat,:d SN fin} 1.98 0.74 0.89 3.61 I I \,·-1 I I I I I I I I (J I I I I I I I . ( ) I I 7.0 OTHER PERMITS I In 7.0 OTHER PERMITS I • Postmaster/ Mailbox Location Approval • Fire Hydrant Locations Approval I • Street Name Approval I • King County Metro Approval I I I I I () I I I I I I I I .I 11614.004.doc I I I I I I I I I ,• I I I I I I I I I -~' ,-) t.~ I ~ Bil 525 53) 515 51) 505 500 "'95 1'-30' ,0 .. "'-•\. k, v/ .Ull' PCllll [UY .... 503.91· • LD'III P!ltlJ'STA • 10Hi5 -NI ffi· ,.-10i«I -··· : w.-El&!.; 50is1: '-'Ji,:.; MJD. R,• ::~ ~ ----,-•-~r ._. , . ., __ -·,·::: "ii t g~~r Jjf -~ t : .:.ij u:,2:. "'SU o·o.m: J; •§ "'"' .ffl'E 1-.. . . ' . . . . . _ W'}.IIQ.J..fII \WEU::RATE. Sl1c-1~~u- t IC-:i00.7'2(E) ... ,,. "i" ;lj\ l .... ROAD 'A' PROFILE ,-.30... t"-$V [ctu. BEFORE YOU OIO I ~ OC>--424--5555 llD -DY COlffl.&J NOffi c,ura, "" ~ ""' "" ~ ""' "" ;1 C()lflll,JCTta StW1. IE RA.LY IEiPOldl£ RIA OBTINIG P£JIIITS fllCJII TH[ -.sl-Nm'IN STATE DEJWmlDIT IF IWUW. R£SO.RlES FlJR IIDIO,IN; #I> RE1ViCNC Ml. SUl'4't IIONlMJmlD( THoV w.T IE .lfftc1UI Bf CON5TltUCTOI AClMIY, PURSL.WIT TO 'Ille J.J:!-120. M'f'IJCATIONS WST BE <DF\CltD Bf A REQS1ERD) 1.NCI ~ ~ F1Jfl PEAlffl 1t1 IIDIM IKllU£KIS IMT BE 08TMIED AQil Tl£ WII.Sltf,l;TON STAl£ l)[PNffil[NT (lf" Ml1IM.. RESOUIUS, OR Bf CONTAC'!IC DD omCE: Bf lEl!PIOI[ IJ (20&) eo:z-1100. 'USMNlrn:Jlli S11il[ DEPMnEff IF IMJIRIII. Jit5ClR;[S PUBl£ I.NI) SLIMY omcE 1111~'5TllllTS.L P.O. BOX 47DIO tl.YWM. '&IISHICltJI !lll!l504-7'Dl!ICI l,f'(J,I CCIFIDOI OF cacmu::tJ0N. .IU. IIIOIUEftS D9'UIC()). ADOWm, OIi DESIRIMll SHIU BE REPtJrall 81' ~ ll[QfflJIED l#ll SUMTOlt. IJ ll£ (XIST NG ~T M Dll£CnCIN ~ 1HE CON11W:Ct1!. l'URSUfff 10 1l£SE ~ M N'PflCPIIIIIJE fCllllG Fllfl IE'UCElEfl Of" SJ&I MONMXWDI 5tW.L IClO EiC TM[ RESPOIC!B.Jl'f' or n£ a»ITRICfCIR. :.1' !ii ..... . : f ---, -~= . '. , __ -__ :_ i:f. . -::~{ ·! RATHINAM SHORT PLAT GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN LOCAlED IN lHE S.W. 1/4 OF lHE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST tf:_"' 0 i ;1' fQll":'P 4"x ,. ,..pe;c ¥QH .,,, TOP BEVrfli ,. LGT 7 /~"'c&.5.k/-c,, CALCO ~~p \\ J.,,,-"' ffl'C.IWIRICQ . \\) ~ OEDII. TIIS StED ffii(( r . c_9·_;_ s . ......., \ i ~~ ~=;;vc~P ~ 1.71.:e:p~_ CCR.~-r '506-> ~ o_, '--~· ~/ .,.,,. / .fa:50t. N Of P'/f)F, COit " ,<'' &-0.45' ;/i" IRON PrPf q.;r w • \ OF CA.lC O CC~N!R _ 'v,t'\ ; 6-----::f!'t; g ' " ( ocoi.:ND \ LOT 7 .... ,;,- I /5 (m~r-\ ~\ / 6 \ I # 'b / '\ .,_lf(}'?"',-- ,•."> ,,,c.:,{t.;t;ff/X'' 525-<';'.''i;t'.ttf}:{i' 53) lOT 8 .~ '515 PAR[NT PARCEL ARO: 98,00B± SO. f"T. ) 51) (2.25~ ~CRfS) NOTE: r~~ : 505 Ai.L D</S,!NG STR'.JC11JRl~ TO 8£ R(MQl,£0. ,_, ,500 ~ ' , \ ,.i ,ar ,_,_,__"' " \ • ~ ";'.,"L·~~___'i I I I • T-47 ~ I .3 I i ',! ROU£D ewe kt, c:untR PER OCJ11!1S HD ~..t-01;;-,~ .. n, Raay~~ 00 , 1,.,.,, \ ~'--+-,;-"' 7\ \ \_ 1 \ I \ , 1 / --1--..f / r--n ,.._. B( ~ • \ _I f ··1;; \ \ ~ y~~ 9 ' • • .q, I I ~. iii ii ,,, .. 0 I') (& ..... wr g ~- 'So;, .. ... j (lfaY' ,.~ .. ~ J) 6 {t v{'l 'i" r,); IA """"""'"'""" LOCATION AND El£'ATIOHS """ ,. """""""' 495 l~.~ l!EJICM: EX. CB IE,.:Hll7.0D ~ CATCH BASIN T ABt.E, ~~~-TE sfA: 12+.ll.53, 111.50' LT _,,,.,. IEo.5112.711 (E) gi[2;~ 12.50' RT _..,_,. IE-502.57 (W.S) C8fl. TrPE I STk 1o+l5..DD. 12.50' RT _,.,_n l[-«111.51 (N,W') !t-. "'" R0U£D IIN€D Gl¥<TE 1D+M.Oi'.I. 10.50" lJ -=n IE-500.72 (E) gr.,11miia. 21.DO' lT -= IE""502.ll7 (t.W'J -""' srk 13-+11..3$. 21.00' LT Rlll-501..89 IE•4Sl5.ID (N.E.W) gif7·1~.i\t. 21.DO' LT IQla501.71 l[-7.W (N,E.W) ~~ 1 D. SO PIPE SfA. 13+52.9'. 22.l!T LT -· IE•4Sl7.n :!.l,TrPEl-!1,,1" ....,.,,,. 13-+21.Q2,. 51.81' tT ........, . . ....,. :r-,TrPEl-48" -1.3-+11.112, 1:2.111' LT _,,,,.,,, ...... .,,, "' "'"""' ~-cs,· . _____ \. _____ _ =~·~---ffDLF'EX.t2"SD 515 ·,·; 515 51) ~~~'f""4=,~ isoo !51> !505 505 : :sr...:. ~i;~,- .toU:n".so: ~~·.·=_'."_ :·=--= .. '. -,' :: : . . : . . . . . ., 500, . ~:12;:ij::: ., ~~"mm =''"f"'' :,l;;;.:!'Db~ •·.···~~~ + ~ + . ,1 + + ' + - iz1.llff. LT .. "'" »= '"" """ KING COUNTY 0.0 .. E.S. Rme-. Eng;---.w.tES H. SANDERS, p L ""'"""""' '"""""' Cornm«rtll: Completloro Oot. Com-- ~-Om j I ~ • ~ 1~~ ~ ~ le ~ IE i iif ,~~ ~~ • I ti I ~~~, ; 18 iii C? !ii; 0) ~ J I! n ~·~~~ I I I i 1 I Ji w ~ ~ ~ ~~ i~::lt.! ,~ 0:i:Nr--:ii; ~°''f'f ~ "iijta ;· IO .,..._ .. 1e~~ • ~~~~ 6 OJ~~·· .. , ..... :J . . & q' ~ ~ ·_ ' : 0 ,, g."'e t eof-"".$' { \,, ; 0 ~ ' ' "' ~' t .,,. ,. 0 i .7 l~ ii !~ ~-~l !2 • 0 5 )i ~ 0 ~ 0 i~ ~ 0 ~ 11) I ~ • >= I "~ i __ ~ 1 5 < wl ~ :$_ UI I Ir) I I I I I I I 8.0 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN I C.) I I I I I I I I I \ I In I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I ( I I ' \. 8.0 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) analysis and design complies with the KCSWDM. The TESC elements are addressed as follows: Clearing Limits: The clearing limits are on the engineering plans and will be flagged in the field. Cover Measures: Cover measures are added in the TESC notes on the engineering plans. Perimeter Protection: (silt fencing). Perimeter protection is shown on the engineering plans Traffic Area Stabilization: A stabilized gravel construction entrance is shown on the engineering plans. Sediment Retention: A temporary sediment pond is proposed on site at the low point in the topography. Surface Water Control: Interceptor ditches with checked dams are shown on the engineering plans and will be implemented during construction if needed. Dust Control: Dust control by sprinklering will be utilized if needed. Wet Season Construction: Construction will be conducted according to the King County's standards during the wet season. Construction Within Sensitive Areas and Buffers: No construction is proposed within sensitive areas or buffers. Maintenance: Maintenance requirements are detailed in the TESC notes on the engineering plans. Final Stabilization: Upon completion of the project, all disturbed areas will be stabilized and Best Management Practices removed if appropriate. 11614.004.doc I I I I I I I I I .() I () I I I I I I I I I KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Project Location : Production of Runoff Time Series Sea-Tac Computing Series Regional Scale Factor : 11614TESC.tsf 1. 00 Data Type : Reduced Creating 15-minute Time Series File Till Grass Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTGlSR.rnf 1.16 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI15R.rnf 1.09 acres Total Area 2. 25 acres Peak Discharge: 1.87 CFS at 6:30 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:11614TESC.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:11614tesc.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:11614tesc.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:11614TESC.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command exit KCRTS Program I In I I I Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:11614tesc.tsf · Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Peak ·Fl ow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0. 519 6 8/27/01 18:00 0.395 8 1/05/02 15:00 1.24 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.418 7 8/23/04 14:30 0.808 3 11/17/04 5:00 0.657 5 10/27/05 10:45 0.742 4 10/25/06 22:45 1.87 1 1/09/08 6: 30 11614TESC.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.87 1 100.00 0.990 1.24 2 25 .00 0.960 0.808 3 10.00 0.900 0. 742 4 5 .00 0.800 J;~ib 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0. 500 0.418 7 1. 30 0.231 0.395 8 1.10 0.091 I Computed Peaks 1.66 50.00 0.980 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' \ .. ) l-. ) .SA; 2..otoos+ ~ Q-ts 11-\.-rtS\,\) SA,. (2.o<oo )(. Sl 'l) .: 1014. 5Lc.-8. Page 1 --------------------. Site Improvement Borrd Quantity Worksheet -· {® King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Rathinam Short Plat Location: 11634 SE 192nd Street Renton1 WA 98075 Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? ~~~~~~~ yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 X no For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: . Project No,: Activity No.: 11/11/2004 L04S0003 Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database.· 116148ond Quantity Worksheet.xis Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 • Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 -------------------.·-"' ,_ Site Improvement Bohd Quantity Worksheet leROSIONISEDIMENJl}!CONTROi.Hi!f i (Backfill & compaction-embankment_ f Excavation-bulk- (Fence, silt iNGPE) Mulch,bv hand, straw, 3" deeo aed Water truck, dust control WRttslW,i;rEtvtStMtj Page 2 of 9 11614Bond Ouanttty Worksheet.xis ESC-1 ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03. 9(3) ESC-4 ESC-5 ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 ESC-7 ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 ESC-10 SWDM 5.4.2.1 ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 ESC-12 ESC-13 ESC-14 ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 ESC-16 WSDOT 9-13.112\ ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 ESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 ESC-25 $ 67.51 Each I 1 I $ 85.45 CY $ 8.08 CY I 201 $ 1.50 CY $ 1.38 LF I 4501 s 1.38 LF $ 0.59 SY I 4aoor $ 1.45 SY $ 2.01 SY $ 0.53 SY s 10.70 LF s 16.10 LF s 20.70 LF $ 2.30 SY $ 39.08 CY $ 1,464.34 Each I 1 I $ 2,928.68 Each $ 1,949.38 Each $ 17.91 LF I 301 s 68.54 LF $ 0.51 SY $ 6.03 SY $ 7.45 SY $ 74.75 HR I 61 Each ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ~~ _ _, 11 68 11 162 11 621 1 I 2832 1 I 1464 -------- 1 I 537 1 I 449 s 6,914.25 $_ 2,074.28 $ 8,988.53 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 --------------Site Improvement Bo,,:::.:,-\ Quantity Worksheet \_,I ·. GI· 2 $ 8.53 GI· 3 $ 0.36 Tree Removal I GI· 4 $ 8,876.16 I Excavation· bulk GI· 5 $ 1.50 GI· 6 s 4.06 GI· 7 $ 18.55 6' hlQH GI· 8 $ 13.44 GI· 9 S 1,271.81 GI· 11 s 12.12 GI· 11 $ 22.57 GI· 12 $ 25.48 GI· 11 $ 37.85 s 54.31 G1·151 $ 74.85 $ 132.48 $ 2.02 $ 0.95 GI· 1' s 135.13 GI· 20 $ 2.88 GI· 21 $ 7.46 GI -2 $ 788.26 GI· 23 $ 1,556.64 1ers 1 GI· 24 $ 85.18 s 7.59 Trail 4" crushed cinder GI· 26 $ 8.33 Trail, 4" ton course GI· 27 $ 8.19 Wall, retainina, concrete GI· 28 $ 44.16 Wall, rockerv GI· 29 $ 9.49 Page 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL -Kee 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614Bond Quantity Worksheet.xis CY SY Acre T 1 I 2.251 CY I I I 400J 600.00 CY LF LF I 1 1 350T 4,704.ool Eachl l 2 2,543.621 LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY 1 l T 30001 2,850.001 Each I I I 1 I 135.1~ Each SY Dav 2 1,576.52 Acre 2.2sf HR 8 681.44 16 1,362.88 ------- SY SY SY SF SF ___ __!,~43.44 16,582.\!;_ Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes -----i -;_,, 11 !llla11iRllllll:111 19,971.36: 3,502.44 23,473.80 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - --11!!1 -----------Site Improvement Bor-1 Quantity Worksheet \_.., - $ 1.38 $ 41.14 RI -5 $ 30.03 Barricade, nme Ill f Permanent \ RI· 6 $ 45.05 Curb & Gutter, rolled RI -7 $ 13.27 Curb & Gutter, vertical RI· 8 $ 9.69 Curb and Gutter, demolition and di!:lno ... IRI -9 $ 13.58 Curb, extruded asohalt RI· 10 $ 2.44 RI -11 s 2.56 RI· 12 s 1.85 RI· 13 s 1.69 RI· 14 $ 0.99 Shoulder AC, l see AC road unit orice RI -15 s Shoulder, aravel, 4" thick RI -16 $ 7.53 Sidewalk, 4" thick RI -17 $ 30.52 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and disno RI· 18 $ 27.73 Sidewalk, 5" thick RI· 19 $ 34.94 $ 34.65 $ 85.28 s 5.82 for crosswalk,I RI • 23 $ 2.38 RI· 24 $ 0.25 Page 4 of 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 11614Bond Quantity Worksheet.xis I 11001 6,325.00 SY SY LF LF 11 45.osl LF -2001 2,654.ool LF 280 2,713.20 - LF LF LF LF I 3601 666.00 LF LF I 3501 356.40 SY SY SY I 2501 7,630.00 SY SY I I L 1001 3,494.00 SY Each Each SF LF I 35of 90.ool 17,780.60 6,193.05 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ----:) Unit prices updated: 02112102 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - --------------Site Improvement Bo(::; Quantity Worksheet For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) ad AC Overlav, 1.5" AC RS ·2 $ 7.39 AC Overtav, 2" AC RS ·3 s 8.75 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS· 4 $ 17.24 AC Road, 2·. 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500SY RS· 5 $ 13.36 RS· 6 s 19.69 AC Road, 3" 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500 S'r RS-7 $ 15.81 AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY RS-8 $ 14.57 AC Road, 5" Qtv. Over 2500 SY RS -9 s 13.94 S · 1 $ 16.76 as. 1 $ 16.12 '\S • 1 $ 9.21 '\S • 1 $ 11.41 lGravel Road, 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500 5,Jc5 -1 s 7.53 as. 1 s 21.51 IPCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY !Rs -1 $ 21.87 Thickened Edqe IRS -1 $ 6.89 Page 5 of 9 SUBTOTAL "'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 116148ond Quantity Worksheet.xis SY I 1000\ 7,390.00 SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY LF 1 1 1 3001 2,067.ool 7,390.00 2,067.00 Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes -----., '-) Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - --------------Site Improvement Bq::_j Quantity Worksheet ;~~B~~i@i;~iiC®~:~~'.mJlli~afai@iits:E~' o-1 $ 16.74 SY I I I 1201 2,008.8c[ 0 -2 S 240.74 Each ===-------'--"0-·-=3-'-"-S 452.34 Each I J J__ 3J 1,357,02 " lCBs include frame and lid\ CB Tune I O • 4 $ 1,257.64Each J 4J 5,030"§§l___ 41 5,030.56 CB T""e IL O • 5 $ 1,433.59 Each CB Type II, 48' diameter 0-6 $ 2,033.57 Each I I I 1 I 2,033.57! 0-7 $ 436.52 FT 0-8 $2,192.54 Each I J __ L __ JJ 2,192.54 0 -9 $ 486.53 FT 0-10 $ 2,351.52 Each 0 -11 $ 536.54 FT 0 -12 S 3,212.64 Each 0-13 $ 692.21 FT Throunh-curb Inlet Framework lAdd\ D -14 S 366.09 Each Cleanout, PVC, 4• D-15 S 130.55 Each Cleanout, PVC, 6' 0-16 $ 174.90 Each Cleanout, PVC, 8" D • 17 $ 224.19 Each Culvert,PVC,4' 0-18 $ 8.64 LF Culvert. PVC, 6" 0 -19 $ 12.60 LF Culvert, PVC, 8" 0-20 S 13.33 LF Culvert, PVC, 12" 0-21 $ 21.77 LF Culvert, CMP. 8" 0 • 22 S 17.25 LF Culvert, CMP, 12' 0 -23 $ 26.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 15" 0 -24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert, CMP, 18" 0 -25 S 37.74 LF Culvert, CMP, 24" 0 -26 S 53.33 LF Culvert, CMP, 30" 0 -27 S 71.45 LF Culvert CMP, 36' 0 -28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert, CMP, 48' 0 • 29 $ 140.83 LF Culvert, CMP, 60" 0 -30 $ 235.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 72" 0 -31 $ 302.58 LF Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL 5,030.56 12,622.49 "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 116148ond Quantity Worksheet.xis Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 6 ----~ ,J 1p49.40 1,049.40 Unit prices updated: 02112102 Version: 4/22102 · Report Date: 4/1212005 - --------------Site Improvement Bo(j Quantity Worksheet ~ Culvert. Concrete, a· D· 32 $ 21.02 Culvert, Concrete, 12· D-33 $ 30.05 Culvert, Concrete, 15" D· 34 s 37.34 Culvert, Concrete, 18' D-35 $ 44.51 Culvert, Concrete, 24" D-36 s 61.07 Culvert, Concrete, 30" D· 37 $ 104.18 Culvert Concrete 36" D-38 $ 137.63 Culvert Concrete, 42' D • 39 $ 158.42 Culvert, Concrete, 48' D • 40 s 175.94 Culvert, CPP, 6' D • 41 $ 10.70 Culvert CPP, s· D· 42 $ 16.10 Culvert, CPP, 12' D· 43 $ 20.70 Culvert, CPP 15" D-44 s 23.00 Culvert, CPP, 18' D • 45 $ 27.60 Culvert CPP, 24' D· 46 $ 36,80 Culvert, CPP, 30" D· 47 $ 48.30 D· 48 $ 55.20 D· 49 $ 8.08 D • 50 s 25.99 D-51 $ 22.60 ID· 52 s 2.40 I Infiltration oond testinn D· 53 $ 74.75 D-54 $ 1,605.40 D • 55 $ 14.01 IRestrictor/Oil Seoarator, 12" D-56 $ 1,045.19 LRestrictor/Oil Separ~(O!, 15' D· 57 $ 1,095.56 D· 58 S 1,146.16 D • 59 $ 39.08 Tank End Reducer 135• diameter) D· 60 $ 1,000.50 Trash Rack, 12" D · 61 $ 211.97 Trash Rack, 15" D· 62 s 237.27 Trash Rack, 18" D-63 $ 268.89 Trash Rack, 21' D· 64 s 306.84 Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 116148ond Quantity Worksheet.xis LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF I 3651 7555.51 313\ 6479.1 LF LF LF LF LF CY LF LF SY HR Each SY Each f I I 1 I 1045.19 Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each 7555.5 7524.29 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ----~ .; -._,' Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - -------11!!1 ---· ... --Site Improvement Bo=--1 Quantity Worksheet \_,,' . li2. 2" AC, 2" ton course rock & 4" borrow PL-1 $ 15.84 SY 2'AC 1.5" ton course & 2.5" base cou PL-2 $ 17.24 SY 14" select borrow PL-3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" top course rock & 2.5" base course PL-4 $_ 11.41 SY WI-1 Each Wl-2 SY Wl-3 CY Wl-4 LF ~ FT ~ Wl-7 Wl-8 Wl-9 Wl-10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 8 of 9 39,000.10 44,988.98 11,700.03 13,496.69 50,700.13 58,485.67 B C ·KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 116148ond Quantity Worksheet.xis Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes ---·--·.._; 24,523.20 7,356.96 31,880.16 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - --------·--------·-·-.... -Site Improvement Bo~ Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: -., ._, Name: Hal P. Grubb Date: 2/10/2005 PE Registration Number: 23975 Tel.#: (425) 251-6222 Firm Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South Project No: L04S00p3 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) (A) PERFORMANCE BOND' AMOUNT $ 8,988.5 Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (8) $ 50,700.1 Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities (C) $ 58,485.7 Private Improvements (D) $ 31,880.2 Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond'/" (First $7,500 of bond' shall be cash.) Performance Bond' Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL Reduced Performance Bond• Total••• Maintenance/Defect Bond· Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND' REDUCTION: (A+B) $ 59,688.7 (T) $ 150,054.5 M1nrmum bond: amount is $1000. BOND' AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY••• (E) $ TX 0.30 $ 45,016.3 OR (T-E) $ 150,054.5 Use larger of Tx30% or (f-E) Date: * NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. ** NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND' (B+C) x 0.25 = $ 27,296.5 The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed In this quantity. *** NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised b major design changes. SURETY BOND AIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum addltional pertormance bond shall be $ 90,365.8 (C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND' AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of 9 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 11614Bond Quantity Worksheet.xis Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 4/12/2005 - .. I I () I I I I I I I I. () I I I I I I I I I 9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATIONS OF COVENANT I I .-. l ) I I I I I I I I .-:J I I : I I I I I I I 10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL I • {) I I I I I I I I j _) I I I I I I I I , I 10.0 ) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL The drainage facilities on this project will be public facilities owned and maintained by King County. Therefore, no Operations and Maintenance manual is required. 11614.004.doc r tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296· 7217 www.metrokc.gov Inspector's Daily Report Project No.:. ______________ Activity No.: ____________ _ Project Name: ______________________________ _ Location: __________________ Developer/Contractor: _____________ _ Date Signed > S\Forms\Currcnt Fom1s\lns-Dait.Frn -09-14-06 REPORT Note: Each entry must be dated and signed ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TrY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Design Plan Change 11tott NOT TO BE USED FOR EARLY START To Be Completed by Land Use Inspection Section This plan change is for Landscape/Recreation/Street Tree: D D within the City of: --------- /.,JA "1 8 (or Plan Change No. / Plan Change Activity No. ....,L....o..0=-.,.'1_._f_C,,_/_)._/ __ Upon completion of the review of the revisions, the reviewer shall notify the design engineer: En ineer & License No.: /3c,.,,r-~ b Address: ). Project Name: Pc. ft,; -r-j...,y.f-{w{-Project No. /... 0 ..t-f s; 00-0 3 Site Address· I ( 6 .3 )f 5,' E t q ::i ~ ~ r Inspect Activity No. {;..0; ~I I :;l g On l O / i ~ 7' , the following plan change to the approved plan was: (recommended by DES) (required by DDES) (requested by applicant) I f. x f ~ · d0v ,JJ,... I w,...h rco v-,/1.... ,,., /:.H d.4 h, ft...Q. e.-bo .,...... ....., /fl, 1eu: ie. ~ vi,, If ?r ( ~ E-. p~ µe,w !<Ow -,Q ®'. ~ ~ j(_ eov bo 1"D ~ ~~ ~/~ ~ , . ,. (}:> fO!Y'rk ~~ kf'~i;;z ~="'4,l 5Tfr 13-r\0 (tMJ~,. Reason for Change/Code Citation: ( f{~ rdt,;,w + ~ i,,,,. I/ }-1,. f I f G J... 'til. 1\ iwf r ~ tJ.,,.e. 1i, ffwr ;i . r.lof /;~ J.f1._ f113 [(.C,f(r; This Plan Change involves: ~dway Plan & Profile D Drainage OT~c [3'Piatting D Materials Lab D Planner D Site Development Services (Grading) D Other The proposed change requires revised engineering drawings that must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services for approval: Afr-P~ea:{e:c:iiitcio6j,296:;71.3.7,w!J..li1.i:!iidy io~s,ubipJ1,,.:/I Design changes must be made by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Washington. Payment of fees and deposits are due as of the date ofthis plan change, late penalties (KCC 27.02.030) are applicable. Each submittal shall include three (3) sets of revised plans highlighted in green with a revision block and a symbol by each revision. The revision block must be dated and initialed by the professional engineer making the revision. A copy of this form will be mailed directly to the design engineer indicated above and shall be included with each submittal. date initials/date S:Cui:rent Fann. Design Pan Change.doc 09-12-06 ,.. / 1f /(,. s /6-r >"' f ------------· riM \1EW ft> ' l..-1 -V<'.<l /&I,._ ·---- M (Qj]~ I I { 6· ~ I ()-5 _1· -:) • /ct I 16'' <:c-1/-5" I I ~l }-s-~I --------- • ... 0 (r)_ (/fl I,; 'E ,~/ tZ f) v' --------·- •, I"' • I Thinley, Tenzing From: Sent: To: Subject: fyi From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tenzing, Pray, Jeff Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:01 PM Thinley, Tenzing FW: Rathanam SP/ Jesse Glen Plat Sidewalk Issue Townsend, Steve Friday, September 21, 2007 7:48 AM Thinley, Tenzing Pray, Jeff FW: Rathanam SP/ Jesse Glen Plat Sidewalk Issue Please write up a design plan change to extend the sidewalk in Jesse Glen to the center of the curve and add the ramps per Jim's email. Thanks Steve From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Steve: Sanders, Jim Monday, September 17, 2007 3:00 PM Townsend, Steve Florent, Ray Rathanam SP / Jesse Glen Plat Sidewalk Issue Ray and I have met and discussed the offset sidewalk issue on these adjoining development sites. Based on recommendations from DOT's staff, the following changes are necessary to the approved plans for one or both of these projects. The mid-block crossing ramps, currently shown on the approved plans, shall be completed. In addition, the sidewalk on the westerly side of the Rathanam SP. Shall be extended northerly into Jesse Glen to the center of the curve (e.g to Tract C), where a ramped crossing shall be constructed radially on both sides of the road (see attached sketch). ~ JessieGlenCrosswal ks.pdf (67 K ... Please call Ray or myself if you have questions on this. Thanks, Jim 1 ~111 '--A --\ ~ ~ ,_s_· 20' . -.... 3: 't... ~, ,~ N 1,JdD-'TIIH"I';;.. .... . 33 ~I~ ·N_5428SFf ·-· 8 • '° CJ) • 1.1aa-o,n .... :;::;w... > .. ~ I CD r,.. ~ ·"' -,ix, .... 50' Jl9.' ':? ~-v)~l,.\?,,,. r-----... -·----·-·------~~··•--• -··· 1t II (,I -+ (I) :-..a ell "'° = !,_ o_ ~ .... 0 - "\· :e14689 SF 4()' OF RIGHT OF WAY ~\ ~ \,~ .· ~< 'bo~ o" .s::f z 0 q ev;,'e._ &:~ 2'><26.5' PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT ~ z q = 0 ~ o,-0 ... -. . ..., C) • o,-41 d~ ~ 42~,~ zl z ~-·o- 43 ~ ::; 44 d,~ o· :el :el :el :el . :e SF 4682 SF 4679 SF 4677 SF 467 4 SF · I 46' 40' ~ •o· t 40· J.. _40' N89"50'55WE -96_0 .... 5-~ ~o ors (:{ !o~ ..,o:, . J,wve'1l-5 ~ ~ ~h ~ ""I 0 fo1. · LINE LINE . I LENGTI L1 98 .~ ---..,. I +1i. j I '-' • i"'ss ~ s '-'-"v. --\; 1.5.• 3: '!... !"I ,u.,. 20· ri . .,a .......... .,..... I . 33 ~Ii .. I · N 5428 SF , w~ , CO. CJ> -f ._,a-·uu-,a#... .>« • -O> I OJ ,-N ,,.... -,ix, ..,. 50' .99.' Cl S )t:x.vJJ.4l,.\?--. 1/ II (>I ... + O> ;,J al =·= 40' OF RIGHT OF WAY )~\ ""\ v\ ~ . ' ----h.,:< (b() ;;:) c" S[ z 0 q e,v;,'e__ G'~ 38' RIGHT OF WAY + -t----+-2'><26.5' PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT z ~ - o,-0 "": ::j C) • ! 0, ... 41 ~~ 0, ... 42~~ :El :El :El :El . :E 468f SF 4682 SF 4679 SF 4677 SF 4674 SF I 46' o· 40' = 40• I 40· J.. .JO_. ---- NBS-50'55 .. E 960.5~ ~o c'?3 (S ~l)i .._OJ (o ~5~~~h~ q/'r"l/o"[. . LINE LINE . T LENGTI L1 98 . ·, ® l<ing County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Drop-Off over Sheet for LUSD ONLY 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS ProjectNo.: LotfSOOO;? Project Namr:Ja-H,11 .. e.u. Shod -p\c,_--1- FROM: Cktc.v:tiv Hc ...... ,1, ::I;.c,,/Bol. ~f'>o,c.) Company Name !Contact Person Telephone No: ...:?olo -'{'1[, ..27/1 Date Received by LUSD ('' 'l::,1Clij'11~ t ll l . : ; i 9 i'.007 y 1;, lt(t l:).D.tt.S •. TO: M1Ka. Me'M.S r:......, ______ """""ii',il ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY i;::; :, P ~ltrase print) Short Plat / Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: 3· Co?ie~ ,J ?4°0" Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit -Additional information requested. Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other: ------------------------------------ PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Drop-Off Cover Sheet-LUSD Only lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 11-03-2004 Page 1 of 1 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakcsd:ile Ave SW Renton. Washington 98055-1219 Monday, October 29, 2007 [°Activity Number: I : Project Number: I Description L07PC 121 L04S0003 l 1. FEE RECEIPT Applicant: THOMPSON ROBERT E 2705 SST SE AUBURN WA 98002 Checklog Check # Payee Date Entered ------------·---------~ ---------Amount -$1,40CfoO ----$205~28 Deposit Ba~c( ?~-}~-~~ J·I_~~ ~it_c_!:1_~_cct _C~u_n!er y~__: -------------------------·-------·-·· ·----· --- SUBTOTAL: Description _______ .5.!1~k~o_g __ <:~!:ck # Check 4884 ----------·------------------------ S!JB TOTAL: CIIANGE GIVEN: BA LANO: DUE: -· ---·-------------------- Pay!e_ _ THOMPSON ROBERT E ------ Date Entered J0!29i2007 $1,605.28 Amount ($1.605.28) ($1,605.28) . $0.00 $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. DOES permit fees were restructured effective March 4th, 1999. Many fees previously assessed a flat fee, now are assessed as hourly charges. Because of this change, and to ensure that our customers secure permits as quickly as possible, permits may be issued prior to all hourly charges being recorded into our billing system. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. Printed on: Monday. October 29, 2007 at 8:37:00 AM Page I of I Tenzing Thinley King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Inspection Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055-1219 CIVIL ENGINEERING, lAND PlANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES October 26, 2007 HAND DELIVERY RE: Submittal of Design Plan Change for Rathinam Short Plat Project King County Plan Change Activity No. L07PCl2l King County Project No. L04S0003 Our Job No. 11614 Dear Tenzing: At your request, we have prepared a design plan change addressing Plan Change No. 1 with the above activity number. We are enclosing three copies of Sheet C4 of 8, which has been revised to address this plan change. The revisions are as follows: 1. We have shown the extension of the sidewalk and curbs north within I 17th Place S.E. matching into the adjacent plat to the north called Jesse Glen. We have obtained AutoCAD files from ESM Consulting Engineers and imported them, which show the alignment of the rights-of-way and the roadway. The curbs and gutters, as well as the sidewalks, align exactly. We have also removed the temporary cul-de-sac that was originally shown on the construction plans. 2. We have included a driveway detail for the access to the detention pond facility off of S.E 192nd Street. The driveway was built; however, a detail of the driveway was not included on the original plans. As requested, we have included this detail, as well as the detail of the concrete walk transition to the driveway. This should cover the requirements for this design plan change. Should you have questions or comments, please contact Cara M. Visintainer or me at this office. Thank you. Respectfully, 7fiJ // ~Ca_, Hal P. Grubb, P.E. Director of Engineering Services HPG/ath/ca l l 614c.022.doc enc: As Noted cc: Bob Thompson, Charter Homes Cara M. Visintainer, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES + OLYMPIA, WA + TACOMA. WA + SACRAMENTO. CA + TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98057-5212 October 16, 2007 Page 1 of 1 TlIIs Is Nor DETFTJ•~-FlNA.LFEE --.vll1V,41JON Summary of Charges and Payments ~--·--------------'---- Applicant: CHARTER HOMES, INC. 601 UNION ST, #5100 SEATTLE, WA 98101 206 322 4393 ~-,.,;., :S,:14i~@IMIJ11t1r111a: I Description DepositBased,on;EstHrs. Site Inspect Counter Fee SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check # SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid Payee Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Date Entered L07PCl21 L04S0003 CHANGE PENDING Amount $1,400.00 $205.28 $1,605.28 Amount $0.00 $1,605.28 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -- ·' ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Drop-Off for LUSD ONLY ·: Cover Sheet 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division ***********************IMPORTANT*********************** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: Project Name: FROM: TO: L04SR077 Rathinam Short Plat Hal P. Grubb, P.E. , Barghausen Engineers Company Name / Contact Person Telephone No. (425) 251-6222 Tenzing Thinley Date Received by LUSD ~~~c::~,~\QJ K.C. o.o.E.S, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: 1 copy revised Significant Tree Retention Plan / 1 copy revised Landscape BQW Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped off: bANQ YS~ INSPEC!ION SFCIIOM g(C O Iii 2006 RECEIVED Other: ___________________________________ _ PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the .Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002Page 1 of 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Bruce Engell King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 5, 2006 COURIER DELIVERY RE: Submittal of Revised Significant Tree Retention and Replacement Planting Plan Rathinam Short Plat King County Project No. L04SR077 Our Job No. 11614 Dear Bruce: Enclosed for your use is a slightly revised Significant Tree Retention Plan for the Rathinam short plat located on the north side of S.E. 192nd Street. It is my understanding that our client, Charter Homes, Inc., has discussed the issue with you regarding the necessary removal of one tree that was originally proposed to be saved. Specifically, this tree is located near the southwest comer of the subject property in line with a sewer main designed by Soos Creek Water & Sewer District. Therefore, this plan addresses the removal of this tree and the installation of two additional 3-inch caliper trees in accordance with your e-mail dated November 13, 2006, addressed to Jim Hutson of Charter Homes, Inc. We have added these two additional trees adjacent to the north side of the stormwater control pond facility. Sheet LI, the Street Tree Plan, is also enclosed for your use showing these same two trees in reference. The calculations on the plan have also been revised and noted in the revision block. The following documents are enclosed for your review approval: 1. Four (4) copies of the revised Significant Tree Retention Plan 2. Two (2) copies of the Landscape Bond Quantity Worksheet that has been revised to account for the two additional trees We are also delivering a copy to the Land Use Services Inspector, Tenzing Thinley, as requested, for his use in construction. Please contact me as soon as possible if you should have any questions or comments. Respectfully, ~y ~ LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION OEC O 8 2006 Hal P. Grubb, P.E. VE D Director of Engineering Services REC E I HPG/tep (l 1614c.Ol 9.doc] enc: As Noted cc: Jim Hutson, Charter Homes, Inc. (w/enc) Tenzing Thinley, King County DOES (w/enc) 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES + OLYMPIA, WA + TACOMA, WA + SACRAMENTO, CA + TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com , ® Kii:ig Countvr Development ancl Environmental S01Vices 900 Oakesclale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-nH For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. PROJECT NAME: Rathinam Short Plat -Significant Trees and Street Trees, Form 1 of 2 LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION DDES PROJECT NO: ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: L04SR077 11634 192nd Street, Renton, Washington BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. H. BRUCE MCCRORY, RLA NO. 504 DEC 08 2006 RECEIVED PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance Inspection deposit is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2· year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. FT.) $0.0( HYDROSEEDING (FRONTAGE R.0.W.) $50.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. FT.) 7 $350.0( SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0( B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0 C. PEAT MOSS (2 INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) $0.0 D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING) $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) $0.0( E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) $0.0( PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75~2" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST& LABOR 17 $4,250.0( PERIMETER AND PARKING AREAS 1.50-1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST&LABOR $0.0( INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED LANDSCAPING B. EVERGREEN TREES (SIGNIFICANT TREE REPLACEMENT) FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST&LABOR 38 $5,700.0( C. SHRUBS (POND) $35.00 EACH COST&LABOR 25 $875.0( D. GROUNDCOVER $4.00 EACH COST & LABOR $0.0( MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH PER ST AKE & LABOR 70 $186.0 vneck out ,,,e uut::, vveo s1te at www.meuoKc.gov es Page 1 of 2 12-17-2003 11614.008.xJs L_/__J ~· ~.:_;~;:;,Jll!~m,·st'"''""'"''"'"'"'!ilil Yf1'·~(''''"'"''''""'"'"'I'~,,;,\}'~ <>l,;1/>•,C,, ,.,, ... ii,)" ,; ·,,;\\ ''•'''"""''',''' . ;, '" : .. rb., UNIT:iP.RICE·\'fti 1tri'li1 )J\ fi,J-_is;UNITf:'fY~E, 'fff-,1".l( .. -:: :f\~QUANTITY(*, 1:·11, •. -·{PRICE:t. r:1 <,' ':.-:f'~."'':<~>Sr:'I.: i• '$:·•:.._--:•,,,'i'fii;!f.:1<··J'\'. :::l_ ,;, :::;.f ~r-•.':.'/$:':"•;:_.~~'. '! J\.l•\11•°:"}'·!_11f ,§:.1,:t:.-,• • ,'1S,l'-,;,'!J. -,.-:...;r,,;~· ~ •,_. F " • ..,,_r,.,.,.._. :· ,; <_ • ,_'h FENCING (FENCE AT POND IS PART OF CIVIL SITE BOND) SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT (INCLUDES LABOR) $0.0( BERMING $17.50 LINEAR FOOT $0.0( (INCLUDES LABOR) IRRIGATION $0.80 SQUARE FOOT $0.0 RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36-INCH BALL $260.00 EACH $0.0( 60-INCH BALL $920.00 EACH $0.0( RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12-INCH BALL $26.00 EACH $0.0( 24-JNCH BALL $33.00 EACH $0.0( ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ON SITE RECREATION F ACILIT!ES See park quantity calculations, Fonn 2 of2 $0.01 $0.0( $0.0( $0.0( $0.0( $0.0C $0.0( $0.0( SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT $11,361.0( Add 30% of the Bond Sub~ Total for Contingency in Accordance $3,408.3( with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOTAL BOND PRICE $14,769.3( Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 12-17-2003 Page 2 of 2 11614.008.xls L_/___J ., .• ® Ki~g Countyr Development and Environmental services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 206-296-{;600 TTY 206-296-7217 PROJECT NAME: Rathinam Short Plat -Si nificant Trees DDES PROJECT NO: L04SR077 ADDRESS: I 1634 192nd Street, Renton, Washington LAN0SCAPe60ND QUANTJtTY . . W.ORl<$H~eT FORM ..... . te formats, call 206-296-6600. es Form I of2 PREPARED BY: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. H. BRUCE MCCRORY, RLA NO. 504 PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced .to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be heldfur a two year period. Upon re-Inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance Inspection deposit Is required prior to permit Issuance to cover the costs of the 2· year maintenance Inspection. Landscape Inspections are billed at the current hourly rate onca tho lnltlal deposit Is oxhausted. If the · project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficlences are corrected. SOD LAWN AREAS HYDROSEEDJNG (FRONTAGE R.O. W.) SOIL PREPARATION' A. TOPSOfL (6 fNCHES DEEP) B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) C. PEAT MOSS (2 fNCHES DEEP) D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING) E. FER'nLIZER PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES l.7S-2" CALIPER (minimum height 10') PERIMETER AND PARKJNG AREAS l.50*1. 7.S" CAUPER INTERIOR LANDSCAPING Ok OTHER REQU!REiD I.ANDSCAPINO $500.00 $50,00 $25.00 $4.00 $2.30 $26.00 $6.67 $250.00 EACH $225.00 EACH B. EVERGREEN TREES (SIGNIFICANT TREE REPLACEMENT) FIVE (5) FEET QR ABOVE $150.00 EACH C. SHRUBS (POND) $35.00 EACH D. GROUNDCOVER $4.00 EACH MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH MSF (1,000 SQ. FT.) MS!' (1,000 SQ. FT.) CY(CUBICYARD) CY (CUBIC YARD) SY (SQUARE YARD) SY (SQUARE YARD) CY (CUBIC YARD) COST&LABOR COST&LABOR COST&LABOR COST&LABOR COST&LABOR PER STAKE & LABOR vnecK out me uuc<> neD 8tte at www.merroKc.gov 88 12-17-2003 7 17 38 25 70 $0.0( $350.0( $0.0( $0.0( $0.0( $0.0( $0.0( $4,250.0( $0.0( $5,700.0( $875.0( $0.0( $186.00 Pago 1 of 2 11614.008.xls LL.J .. ' I \ . '' • :i{~tttAi(~:.f)J?~;t~~1~?i:t~{{tZiif.!i~~t·1~:0~~ f~t.~!1-~:~Tf~ lfil~iif 11~:~~itrlt~ifii{~i~i ~~Mi~i!N.~J il~flWS.~i\frili FENCING (FENCE AT POND IS PART OF CIVIL SITE BOND) !SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 IBERMING $17.50 ;IRIUGATION $0.80 !RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36-INCH BALL $260.00 60-INCH BALL $920.00 1RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12-INCH BALL $26.00 24-INCII DALL $33.00 !ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ,ONSITE RECREATION FACILITIES See park quantity calculations, Form 2 of2 I LINEAR FOOT I I (INCLUDES LABOR) I LINEAR FOOT I I (INCLUDES LABOR) I SQUARE FOOT I I RACH EACH EACH EACH SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT Add 30% of the Bond Sub~Total for Contingency in Accordancel with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOT AL BOND PRICE $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.0C $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.0I $0.01 $0.01 $0.0I $0.01 $0.1)( $0.01 $11,361.01 $3,408.31 $14,769.31 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 12-17-2003 Page2of2 11614.008.xls L_/_J soc Page .J of I Meins, Mike From: Engel!, Bruce Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:33 AM To: Bob Thompson Cc: Meins, Mike Subject: RE: Rathanam Short Plat (L04S0003) The bond should have been posted before any site work started. We are requesting a bond now to ensure the existing retained trees survive until the street trees are linalcd. Also, posting the bond allows you to record. · From: Bob Thompson [mailto:bthompson@charterhomesinc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:21 AM To: Engel!, Bruce Cc: Meins, Mike Subject: Rathanam Short Plat (L0450003) Good morning Bruce, I had my Land Development Superintendent go by the site this morning and check the significant tree plan against the trees actually saved, and find that one tree that was noted to be save (T47) which has a note concerning fire damage to it was taken out. This particular tree would have been located on the new lot 2. I wonder why a tree damaged by fire would have been considered a save tree in the first place, maybe you can let me know. This being the case, why would we need a bond for the significant trees now that construction is completed? The only items left would be the final lift, installation of street trees, recreation space landscaping and toys and the two street lights located on the north side of 192°d. None of these activities would involve being around any of the significant save trees. Please let me know your thoughts on this as I am trying to get this recorded tomorrow. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Charter Homes, Inc. 206-491 •2719 05/12/2008 Pra , Jeff From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mike: Engell, Bruce Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:43 AM Meins, Mike Pray, Jeff Rathinam Short Plat# L04SR077 As we discussed replacement trees proposed to be planted in the Retention/Detention Facility Tract (tree growth easement?) on the above referenced plat are not required to be planted and should be removed from the approved Significant Tree Retention Plan before recording. These tree's will not need to be planted elsewhere on the plat as more trees are already being retained than KCC 16.82.156 requires. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. 1 CPH CONSULTANTS l ;, ... ~/ -=. --.i \.'". {l c:,:, ,, 0 Prepared for: Mr. Alex Cugini c/o CenturyPacific, LP 1201 Third Ave, #1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Prepared by: CPI H Consultants Jamie B. Schroeder, PE 733 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1 00 Kirkland, WA 98033 CPH Project No. 0005-07-01 3 February 4, 2009 CPH CONSULTANTS CPH CONSUL TAN TS PRELIMINARY-STORM-DRAINAGE-REPORT ______ _ FOR SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 -PROJECT OVERVIEW •.••.•.............••.•...........•.••••••.......•.......•.................•••••••............•...•••............ FIGURE 1 -VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 -TIR WORKSHEET SECTION 2 -CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY ........•.••....................•••••••..........••.•...................•...... 3 SECTION 3 -OFF-SITE ANALYSIS .•••........•......•...............••••.•...................•••••..........••••.•.......•••.••••.•••...........••. 4 FIGURE 3 -SITE SOILS CONDITIONS SECTION 4 -FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ............•.......•...•.......................••••... 8 SECTION 5 -CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ................••••......................•••.•..................••.......... 9 SECTION 6 -SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES ........••.•••••...............•...•.....•...•.•........•••••..................•..•••........... 1 0 SECTION 7 -OTHER PERMITS ..•.••••..........••....•.................................•.......................•.•••.........•••.............•.... 11 SECTION 8 -CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ................•••••.•......................••••.•...........•••........•..........•...•.... 1 2 SECTION 9-BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT .........•••.............•.... J 3 SECTION 10 -OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL ....•.........•.....•.....•..•........•.•••...........••..••...............•. 1 4 FIGURES- FIGURE 4 -EXISTING CONDITIONS FIGURE 5 -DEVELOPED CONDITIONS FIGURE 6 -STORM DRAINAGE PLAN APPENDICES - APPENDIX A-DRAINAGE ANALYSIS APPENDIX B -RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY CALCULATIONS Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management Land Developmenl (onsulling ) • • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 1 -PROJECT OVERVIEW This Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) describes the storm water conditions and proposed drainage improvements for the Benson Heights project site. It summarizes the analysis criteria of the proposed storm drain collection and conveyance systems as well as the adequacy of existing storm water detention and water quality facilities for the project. The TIR also documents the basis of design of temporary erosion control and sediment retention facilities to be implemented during construction. Figure 2 provides the completed TIR Worksheet for this project. The proposed project site is located along Benson Drive (SR515) between SE 172•d Street and Benson Road South in Renton, Washington. More generally, the site is located in the SE 1/, of the SW 'I• of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, in King County, Washington and consists of a total of approximately 3.8 acres. Figure 1 provides a vicinity map highlighting the regional location of the project. The project proposes the design and construction of two new buildings; one multi-family residential and one commercial. The new 4-story, multi-family residential building will contain 97 dwelling units, underground parking, and associated surface parking. A 3-story commercial building will be located along the southern border of the property line, fronting Benson Drive and 1 08th Avenue SE. The commercial building will include approximately 8,900 SF of retail space and 17,800 SF of general office space, parking garage, and associated surface parking . NOTTO SCALf CPH Proiect No.0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS Figure 1 -Vicinity Map February 4, 2009 Page l Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report · Planned Urban Development Existing Drainage Features An unnamed seasonal stream runs east to west through the middle of the site, bisecting the property into two sub-drainage basins (basins A and B). Basin A, generally located north of the unnamed stream, is comprised of approximately 1.92 acres of second growth conifer and deciduous trees. Basin B encompasses the southern 1.86 acres of the project site. Existing ground cover consists of dense trees and undergrowth. The topography of the entire site generally drains towards the stream at grades of 5 to 20 percent, except the northwest corner of the lot, which collects along the western frontage and is directed south via a rock-li_ned ditch before merging into the stream. Proposed Drainage Features Storm water flow control for the project is proposed by means of two on-site, below grade vault facilities. Each basin (A and B) will contain separate storm water collection, conveyance, and treatment facilities. Runoff generated by portions of landscaped areas and new impervious area will sheet flow to paved parking areas, where it will be collected by a series of catch basins. A sequence of underground pipe that connect the catch basins will convey the runoff westerly to one of two on-site combined detention and water quality vaults. Storm water exiting the vaults will discharge at its natural location into an existing conveyance system along Benson Drive (SR5 l 5). CPH Project No. 0005-07 -0 1 3 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 2 CPH CONSUL TAN TS FIGURE 2 TIR WORKSHEET Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management land Development Consulting • ) ) • KING COUNTY WASHINGTON SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Engineer: Phone: (425) 285-2390 /·Rart73r> ,,1T,¥RE,01;/'flERM lifiAR.RllilCATION1, "r•:;,,J ;'C ,,-; · ,. ,. , , .. , , ,,.-,, t"· ·cri·" '/l!J,L.--,,." ,11,Fij,/' ''"ir!f,UI-,h«rf/ir 'i-"'l'''lF· ·"wi'!1h,,,/, ,"111,1;/, ii,~,!~:~b~~~~:n~~f~~~,~:::if:~~:~'"t!;tj~ Cl Building Services M/F / Commerical SFR 0 Clearing and Grading 0 Right-of-Way Use 0 Other ____________ _ Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) Date of Approval:------------- 2005 Surface Water Design Manual i~R,~rfJ2.li1jPr~!':!J,EqT,!,iQfAif!O~,~ND1;,fi,;,f ' 1!.DESCRJF,(lilQNhl\,;!._,'i,_i/,.:1,p1t,:l.:i,_,,: .. /1:.:· .,, •• ," : 'f':(·· Project Name: Springbrook Ridge DDES Permit#: Location: Township: 23 Range: 5 Section: 29 Site Address: SE 172"' St. between Benson Dr. South and 108~ Way SE in Renton, WA '.'.Raiti4, ''OTHERiREVIEWS''·ANOrPERMlifS ,; ' "'/',", ~~<>'.:J~~i1_11/r·l:••~;f.::,,;/11,;~{ J. '19;1',n;1'f,?j:tlf'( i:;;,,, , 1, ,', I J ~:·,)'.'. ,;:41,, f :· , " .. Cl DFW HPA D Shoreline D COE 404 Management D DOE Dam Safety Cl Structural 0 FEMA Floodplain RockeryNault/ __ 0 COE Wetlands O ESA Section 7 0 Other ____________ _ Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: 1/1/05 0 • • C I) • • KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 11,~~itj1,,i,/,~9r,!i!li~,it4;~:,~1;~!;l/Rl=.~,~,~l~• ', ··" " ., 1m1'" 1 ''"~li!.Jd{n, ;'h, w,.1 ';1,1',.<t· i'~~~, .. t· ll"-'' "-' '""-~ Monitoring Required: Yes / No Describe: Start Date: Completion Date: Drainage Basin: --"-B--'la:.:ccc.k.:._R.:._iv--=e.:..r ___ ~~---------------------------, Stormwater Requirements: __:::C:.:oc..n"'s"'e'-'rv,.,a:..:t:.:ioc..nc:Fc:l:::o.c:w'------------------------------j El River/Stream Unnamed seasonal D Steep Slope D Lake D Erosion Hazard D Wetlands D Landslide Hazard D Closed Depression El Coal Mine Hazard D Floodplain D Seismic Hazard D Other D Habitat Protection Soil Type AgC Slopes 5%-20% Yes D High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) D Other _______ _ D Sole Source Aquifer D Seeps/Springs D Additional Sheets Attached 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 2 1/1/05 C C • • KING COUNTY WASHINGTON SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET "Par'f1.f RAIN'.6:GE!DES1GN 11:!IMITATIONS 1in1/i//11Qrii1J~m11»', · · · · · • · ~ ,--Ji·· n;;,1-i&1m;, .. 11f1t11tiir,·1-'i:1'.'/:1'i!i11111. ·1i,1;~-.·· W I "°" , • .!J)l. ·I{/ (· · ~ .. , 'l ''• REFERENCE D Core 2 -Offsite Analysis D Sensitive/Critical Areas D SEPA D Other D D Additional Sheets Attached Core Requirements (all 8 applvl Discharoe at Natural Location Offsite Analysis Number of Natural Discharne Locations: 1 Level: 1 / 2 I 3 Dated: ____ _ Flow Control Level: 1 / ~ / 3 or Exemption Number ___ _ (include a facility summary sheet) Conveyance Svstem Erosion and Sediment Control Maintenance and Operation Financial Guarantees and Liabilitv Water Quality (include facility summary sheet) Small Site BMP's: Soil! containment located at: CB prior to vault ESC Site Supervisor: N/A Contact Phone: After Hours Phone: Responsibility: Private / Public If Private, Maintenance Loo Reauired: Yes / No Provided: Yes / No Type: Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basic / Bog or Exemption No. ---------- Landscape Management Plan: Yes / No Special Requirements (as aoolicablel Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA I SDO / MOP / BP / LMP / Shared Fae / None Reouirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / None Flood Protection Facilities Source Control (comm./industrial landuse) Oil Control Other Drainaqe Structures Describe: 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): ------- Datum: Description: 2 combined detention water quality vaults Describe landuse: Commercial Business Describe anv structural controls: High-use Site: Yes / No Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom?: 3 1/1/05 • ) ) • • • • KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET \P~it;'1.~;/:.;r:,,o_SIPN.Y~~,1:rs~_DJ,1'vl~E1"1<;Q~rJ!,RtD~;;~1;9u11:tF.M~.~~-~}" '.jiJ·,:1,~-.r:h!' I)\;;''. "i(.'\ '1r;:i. .. ·1.J, ·;,,·;1fit:iJfj:_ .. ,I' . 'fo ·:~ t' 1: d•,} :- ·,1 <19:: :.'.~ .' 1\!ii:L '.h1dl111;1ff1"/l::i~:;;rl;jllf' ;if,/1 11,':1l-(f~iUJ111~;a.t11flli;J, 1~·J1:e,r1/11w1i:iif:f!·'i!J;;fi1li',"jS;,, ;;ij{1 '!·1:J1i1J;;:,• -1'!;;'i,y.,,·J~>ffi(;,i/.r'1J/! ·.c;~'!f{,itd1'· 1:J1:;;..:Tr:: : .HJ,. '.'.,'_ii,, .. ,{(' ";1;.i .}:~~ .. ·t, ., ' i ~;, • l:- M IN I MUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION Cl Clearing Limits Ill Stabilize Exposed Surfaces D Cover Measures El Remove and Restore Temporary ESC D Perimeter Protection Facilities D Traffic Area Stabilization I!] Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Cl Sediment Retention Operation of Permanent Facilities D Surface Water Control Cl Flag Limits of SAO and open space D Dust Control preservation areas El Construction Sequence D Other f F;!a,~f!,t1,;·..,,1),:s.~9fl~~.~~ty,~1f:~f-'t:~,~:;r;,~-~:~~'~·~·'-~'~)~:i~:jt~,;!thiJ,i~f:.~~~ilM~1i~~n1rn~~!-'.~0 {s.~t!~nf:';rt ~1" ··. , · ·.:-'. ~: .. ·::~:·. _., ~~~1G1, .. Ji;,.;i£n!Js.L~td..·t:..,.,,;~iiL.;;.ti; .• :,L11!.:ui~u •• ;,:::,,;.;}i .. · . ~ ,"·_ •i'., ·'· .':,. '". ',,:·, 11• ·_) :<, · .·· ,,"' .,, ' ,·'. '" :~' Flow Control Tvne/Descriotion Water Qualitv Tvne/Descriotion [I Detention \I"'" I+ D Infiltration D Regional Facility D Shared Facility D Small Site BMP's D Other 1cPart .15<1 ;EASEMEN'TS I TRACTS . ,}: .' 1 ·: -,i,; ;tr i~· tt,i ,Pff'."11;-, . ." '·""··:t!1\/'.,e".'.f-''.';WH1Pi:: .• ,d;.;;·, ·1l''Ff1:;{/1;m,1hlif:kmfu.J!iijJJ;~~.iti!i!~1 ' o Drainage Easement D Access Easement [] Native Growth Protection Covenant D Tract D Other D a D D D D D Biofiltration Wetpool \/ 11 u. I+ Media Filtration Oil Control Spill Control Small Site BMP's Other ',Piirfi1 Ii" ':STRl!ICTl!IRAl!!''ANAL:YSIS'"ri ·'•;;;; 1.;' .·ur.:.,{::,'.·i'.1'.f#i::1, a<; ','./1;'.!,,:f/','i,'~.ri','."i;: fx· ... ::.,.,:,::;:r" ··ii1}•/:1J','iiSn1,;ii. 1:'.' :.,q(· i:1J;_ ~ ,1. i;i Cast in Place Vault i,i1 Retaining Wall D Rockery> 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope D Other ~;ea·rf;f 7. j;. ,SIGNATURE' QJ;-:F,?R'C>FESSIONAL'<'ENGI _ EER),i,l',iE(/;/(#.:YH:';viij:11 '1/Yt,,,.~,,~Hl!;;iJ 4'/iiiJi/ ;1.1:,,,/H;Jr; tt<:!.'i-'' ···);,1} '.1~_"/KJil/1~r"W'.j/;. '/!jr" 1;•"1iJ:.1:1:;jJr J/f'il( '.111/ 111)//'i•· ;:y J:'f" y1;/! .... di! I' -Al/1.i. 'IJ'> 'Ji,P''i/llia( '/.,,,:jJJ[ 'I.\,. ( •fo., <-· ·lt:i1 {,, 'l 1· •h\, • ' '.'t,, ,;:f•.'.1,;,i'l1.:'.;:{,:1f~1,,,;).::·.},,11, ·,,:1.•._:fr,":., . .-,,, ·1, .. :.-'.,,;(;·· ,:, ' •. ' . .._i ·,'.''-'1" C".,:,:.·•:t!.'~, '<if1lit, .1_._':1.../~_·\c",, __ ' JJ,;;.",T.,t·· ,. :,·'! (,.,;\ ji, h· I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. I I Date 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 4 1/1/05 • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 2 -CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Compliance with Project Drainage Requirements The proposed storm water collection, conveyance, and water quality systems supporting this project will be in accordance with the provisions set forth by City of Renton Municipal Code and the King County Surface Water Management Design Manual (KCSWDM), 2005 edition, as adopted by the City of Renton. The project is required to adhere ta the following core and special requirements as specified in Section l .2 of the KCSWDM. KCSWDM Core Requirements 1. Discharge at Natural Location, The project will maintain natural surface water runoff patterns within the Black River drainage basin. 2. Off-site Analysis, Summarized in Section 3 -Off-Site Analysis. 3. Flow Control, The flow control measures were taken into account when designing the proposed on-site drainage vaults. Calculations are in Appendix B. More information will be provided later in Section 4 -Flow Control and Wafer Qualify Analysis and Design. 4. Conveyance System, The conveyance system is closed conduit piping to an on-site storm drainage vault that will discharge to the downstream systems. More information will be provided later in Section 5 -Conveyance System Analysis and Design. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control, There will be erosion and sediment control which will be provided later in detail in Section 8 -CSWPPP Analysis and Design. KCSWDM Special Requirements 1. Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements, Amendments to the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton are applicable to the project. 2. Flood Hazard Area Delineation, The project is not within a flood hazard area. 3. Flood Protection Facilities, Not Applicable. 4. Source Control, A flop tee spill control structure will be provided prior to discharge to storm drainage detention and water quality facilities. 5. Oil Control, Additional oil control measures are not required for the project. CPH Project No. 0005·07 -0 1 3 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 3 Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 3 -OFF-SITE ANALYSIS TASK 1 -STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS The proposed project site is located along Benson Drive (SR515) between SE 172°d Street and Benson Rood South in Renton, Washington. More generally, the site is located in the SE V, of the SW 1/, of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, in King County, Washington (see Figure 1 -Vicinity Map). The site is located in the Duwomish-Green River Watershed, Black River Drainage Basin, and has a total area of 3.78 acres. Existing Site Conditions The total project site consists of two separate parcels (King County parcel No., 2923059009 and 2923059148). The project site is currently undeveloped with a ground cover of moderately dense forest and brush. A class 4 stream (as classified in the Wetland and Stream Delineation Study, prepared by The Watershed Company, doted January 25, 2008) bisects the site into two sub- drainage basins. A 35-ft buffer either side of the stream is required. Both sub-drainage basins drain toward the stream at grades of 1 to 15%. The soil on the site is characterized as Alderwood gravelly sandy loom (AgC) per the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for King County (see Figure 3 -Site Soils Conditions). CPH Pro;ect No. 0005-07 -0 1 3 CPIH CONSULTANTS Figure 3 -Site Soils Conditions February 41 2009 Page 4 • • • • Springbrook Ridge ~reliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development Developed Site Conditions The project proposes the design and construction of two new buildings, parking lots, associated storm drainage facilities and utilities (see figure 5 -Developed Conditions), A residential building will be positioned along the northern property line fronting SE 172°d Street. The structure will contain approximately 97 multi-family dwelling units, underground parking, and surface parking areas. A commercial building comprised of retail stores on the first floor and office space on the second and third floors will be located on the south-west end of the property. Surface parking will encompass most of the remaining developable area. The storm water runoff generated by new impervious surfaces will be collected by a series of underground pipes that will convey the water to one of two on-site combined detention and water quality vaults. The natural discharge location and rate will be maintained with the developed conditions in accordance with conservation flow control requirements. Basic water quality treatment will be provided by a wetpool within the vault. TASK 2-RESOURCE REVIEW An unnamed seasonal stream categorized class 4 per City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC) runs east to west across the project site. Streams are regulated under the Critical Areas Regulations of the RMC. A Wetland and Stream Delineation Study was performed by The Watershed Company on January 25, 2008. A supplemental Stream Study was also prepared in January 2009. The southern half of the site is identified as a Coal Mine Sensitive Area Ordinance according to a Coal Mine Hazard Assessment prepared by Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. (dated March 22, 2004). Further study by Icicle Creek in their January 26, 2009 report states that the area is suitable for the development of structures and paved roads/ access assuming that a plug is constructed at the mine shaft entrance located at the southwest corner of the site. There was no drainage complaints directly related to the proposed site. However, several complaints refer to the surrounding properties. None of these complaints are within the past 10 years or affect the downstream drainage path. No other on-site sensitive areas ore identified by available resources. Mitigation of existing and potential problems is discussed in Task 5 of this section. TASK 3 -FIELD INSPECTION A field inspection was performed on Monday, October 27, 2008, on a clear sunny day with a temperature of approximately 50 degrees F. Below are the descriptions of the onsite, downstream and upstream drainage· basins. Onsite Drainage Basins An unnamed seasonal stream runs east to west through the middle of the site, bisecting the property . into two sub-drainage basins (basins A and B). Basin A, located north of the unnamed stream, is comprised of approximately 2.65 acres of second growth conifer and deciduous trees. Basin B encompasses the southern 1.1 2 acres of the project site. Existing ground cover consists of dense trees and undergrowth. The topography of the entire site generally drains towards the stream at grades of CPH Prniect No.0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTAl'ITS February 4, 2009 Page 5 • • • • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development 5 to 20 percent, except the northwest corner of the lot, which collects along the western frontage and is directed south via a rock-lined ditch before merging into the stream • Upstream Drainage Basin Single and multi-family residences exist to the north and east of the property. The properties directly south of the project site are currently occupied by commercial warehouses. Runoff from SE 172"' Street north and easterly of the site discharges via culverts to a drainage ditch on the northern portion of the site. This ditch heads southwesterly to a catch basin along the western boundary of SR 515. The storm water runoff systems for the surrounding developments appear to be in place and functioning properly. As such, runoff contributions to the site from upstream properties are limited due to the existing topography of the property and the drainage system along Benson Drive. Downstream Drainage Basin Storm water runoff and the class 4 stream exits the site at a single point along the western property line. The stream is collected by a catch basin located along the frontage of Benson Drive (SR 515). An underground pipe system conveys the storm water northwesterly along B"enson Drive approximately 235 feet before crossing underneath Benson Drive (SR515) into an area that is thickly vegetated with trees and brush. A tapered concrete culvert terminates the pipe system and runoff continues west approximately 403 feet within a ditch or channel located between two apartment complexes. Storm water then passes through an energy-dissipating, collection sump before accumulating in an underground vault located along S 36•h Street. The vault discharges into an underground pipe system, which conveys the storm water approximately 1,200 feet westerly through the Cedar Avenue and Sunnybrook developments. The runoff is then discharged to a wetland complex. Please refer to the Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table located in Appendix A for clarification. TASK 4 -DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS The proposed storm water collection, conveyance, and water quality systems supporting this project will be in accordance with the provisions set forth by City of Renton Municipal Code. The project is required to adhere to conservation flow control standards and basic water quality standards. An unnamed seasonal stream bisects the property into two sub-drainage basins (basins A and B). Basins A and B contain separate storm water collection, conveyance, and treatmen_t facilities. Runoff generated by portions of landscaped areas and new impervious area will be collected by a series of catch basins. A sequence of underground pipe that connect the catch basins will convey the runoff westerly to one of two on-site combined detention and water quality vaults. Storm water exiting the vaults will discharge at its natural location into an existing conveyance system along Benson Drive (SR515). The proposed on-site detention and water quality vaults were sized using the King County Runoff Time Series program (KCRTS). Historic site (i.e. fully forested) conditions were considered in the analysis of the pre-developed conditions. Table 4.1. summarizes the basin areas and KCRTS input parameters for the existing (i.e. pre-developed) conditions. CPH P,oiect No.0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 6 • 8 0 • • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Reporf Planned Urban Development Table 4. 1 -Existing Drainage Area Summary Basin ID Total Area Land Cover (acres) (acres) Impervious Till Grass Till Forest A 1.92 0.00 o.oo 1.92 B 1.86 0.00 0.00 1.86 Fully developed conditions were modeled using proposed site conditions. Table 4.2 summarizes the basin areas and KCRTS input parameters for the developed site conditions. Table 4.2 -Developed Drainage Area Summary Basin ID Total Area Land Cover (acres) (acres) Impervious Till Grass Till Forest A 1.92 1.04 0.45 0.43 B 1.86 0.95 0.19 0.72 The preliminary .calculations for the storm drainage facilities are provided in Appendix B. The storm water vault has also been sized for water quality treatment with a wetpool within the vault. The storm water conveyance facilities are shown on the conceptual Grading and Drainage Plans. TASK 5 ;_ MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS The Off-site Analysis Table provided in Appendix A lists the components of the downstream drainage system and conditions of each individual reach. Development of the proposed site will be in accordance with current City of Renton Standards which incorporates the King County Surface Water Design Manual Standards. The proposed storm water collection, conveyance, and water quality systems will provide adequate measures to collect, convey, detain and treat increased surface water runoff and mitigate potential downstream systems. Severe erosion problems .will be avoided with the conveyance system design. This system is designed to contain runoff rates generated by a 100-year storm event. Potential erosion or other impacts to the on- site sensitive areas will be further protected with the conveyance of runoff generated by roofs and portions of on-site landscape areas to the new parking lot structurns. Since the storm water will be conveyed underground, detained and released from the on-site vaults at a controlled rate, potential erosion or damage to the on-site sensitive areas will be mitigated. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) measures will be installed during the construction phase to further mitigate any erosion problems. These measures will be continually monitored and maintained in accordance to City of Renton Standards. Multiple drainage complaints are listed for the properties surrounding the subiect parcel. None of these complaints appear to result from or affect the on-site and downstream drainage features. These complaints have not occurred within the last ten years and are noi included in this report. CPH Pmiect No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 7 Springbrook Ridge _ Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 4 -FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section will be provided with final engineering review. Preliminary calculations for detention and wetpool vault sizing are provided in Appendix B. CPH Project No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 8 ) • • • • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 5 -CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section will be provided with final engineering review. CPH Proiect No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 9 Springbrook Ridge Planned Urban Development SECTION 6 -SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES This section will be provided with final engineering review. CPH P,oject No. 0005-07-013 CPjH CONSULTAITTS Preliminary Drainage Report February 4, 2009 Page 10 Springbrook Ridge Planned Urban Development SECTION 7 -OTHER PERMITS This section will be provided with final engineering review. CPH Projecf No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS Preliminary Drainage Report February 4, 2009 Page 11 • • • • • • • Springbrook Ridge Planned Urban Development SECTION 8 -CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section will be provided with final engineering review • CPH Project No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS Preliminary Drainage Report February 4, 2009 Page 12 Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 9 -BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT This section will be provided with final engineering review. CPH Project No. 0005-07-013 CPIH CONSULTANTS February 4, 2009 Page 13 ) ) ) I) • • • • • • • • Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Drainage Report Planned Urban Development SECTION 10 -OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL This section will be provided with final engineering review. CPH Project No. 0005.07-013 CPIH CONSULTAl'ITS February 4, 2009 Page 14 CPH CONSUL TAN TS FIGURES lite Planning Civil Engineering Project Management Land Development Consulting ) CPH CONSUL TAN TS FIGURE 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management Land Developmenl (on suiting S9( S8/ ,~wl'l11ns and N01N3l:I ~o IJ.l:l NOISlr\JH 31\iO "ON , "" I ·,""'' l .. •• " : ~ ---------~·1' ~ .l! ; \I\,, '\~/t~ ~-=~ ~-------n s: ----1-- 1 I I I I I I I . • s / •••••••••• u • ~ a " " • o.'.~ ~~ ~. ~-.. '" ~a.,::-~i~ ~~e '1 • •, as i• ., •• ;o •• •S ·- / / 0 ''d~ ;, ~ ... ~ !~~~ !:1:3·---;.., ~J~t!i -.,Al/I ~!i<Oo> udd NOlONlHSIIM N01N3l:I ~O AllJ SN0/1/GNOO 9N/1S/X3 1N3l/1Jd013J\30 Nilmln 03NN\lld 3801cl )100cl88NlcldS "J'S '3A It H180T ·""" / / • a ~ ~ "i"~~ ~"' f -!f .... ~~ -~II hlll Zu•n:o,_,-a~~"'~:i=i af'i:cei~ ... 1:i;:~g~~ ~ :::11 t·,~ ...J ~ .;-u ~ .• :11~ <ffi.-1.:'5 ,::~ "~"l'· ::: J 0 ~ (JOOS¥. J.>-i;,z-,.,roN) JSl.lUON "I st ~ w c:: • ~I ;;;;, "I (.!) I l1 rr: • I • 0 ~ : l ••• I ·-i ' •• .. , j ~es l u ! ~ ! I • I / / / / I I I ) CPH CONSULTANTS FIGURE 5 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Site Planning Civil Engineering Proiecl Management Land Development Consulting • • • • • e • • • n u Q_ • 0 . -~ • 2_ ~ • ~ (1) Q • 2 • CL .~ • N .n (Jl .8 N . ;:;-. ;:;-. -::, • 0 >- 0 _J CY' " u cri w Q'. ::, C) c;: / (/) w Q'. ::, C) LL =~ f- / _,".! ~ 0 Q. (1) Q'. / n -0 rs.. 0 / en 0 0 0 ,:; u .!!/, 0 ~ Q_ / CL - '-. ', i ,,/ ,/ ' ~ ~ ~ ,, ;/ y /• /// ~ ', /I ~ •, I ·~ / ' ' ' ~ ··,. ·--.._ ··--., ' -T-, ------I ~ --I ' -I ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ~ ' ' ---------1 ' ~ ' ' ' ~ ' ' I I ~ ' swy4 TWP 23N RSE, W.M. I SEC29 I fi ! j :~B~~: ,CC:,:.;7 ~~~."" ,~~ -----~ ~ ~ i, "~F" i" · ---------c,-~,:..--o · ss•."--ss---ss--s~ ,=:=1f;- -: -------;-----·---------;·'.·· ---! I l i ' ~ ' ' I ~ ' . ' LANDSCAPE AREA (TYP.)J' ~ ' ' ~ i ', ~ ' ' "" i I I . l l L_I_ \ . 1 /i ___ r I I " / ' I -1·l· -·-. I I 1 11-i I I I , i I I I // ! I ' I / ; /!/ ~ ' ~ BASIN 8 (1.86 AC 0.75 AC PARKING 0.20 AC ROOF /i 0.19 AC TILL GRASS 0. 72 AC FOREST $<A: .11.?~t!;O! f;HC. r:J uf,'F?J t·of>1°D I ) .. ! iLli Iv; /~ i-=t !;r; 'j.;; 1~ i .... !.-. ·-i '~ I :i ,, i I"* ! ~i 1~r ~ CALL BEFORE! YOU DIG 1-800-424-5515 ....... lOOOCl'H-W: ........ - 51! ~1m EXPIRE.~ ll~S/ UJ f- (.9 15 0~ _a. 0::D _J ~~ ow 00 c::~ co~ (.9 ::, zo _w c::z c..z en~ cuoo ~ >= ~ 8 ~ 0 ~ lJJ Q ALEX CUGINI i I I 0 " " C/0 CENTURYPACIFIC, LP 1201 TttlRD AVE #1680, SEATIL£, WA 98101 Ptlone: (206) 757-8890 FAX.: [206) 757-7890 CPIH CONSULTANTS ....... 11,1i..,.... ,... ................. (..e:11 tal'II-. .. UO ------~----PROJECT NO fXIOO<!T.C,., '"'"'"' FIGURE 5 ,..m_1_0,_1_ '-' CPH CONSULTANTS FIGURE 6 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management Land Developmenl Consulting • • • • • • • n () CL 0 eg • 2 .: <lJ <lJ Q. 2 [l_ u) n 0) 0 0 N "-n "-N :::, ~ 0 _J CJ> 3 D <D w O:'. ::::, C) LL / {/) w O:'. ::::, C) LL / O:'. e= / U) ~ ~ 0 CL <lJ O:'. / n 0 " 0 / u) 0 0 0 / .~ () .!l!._ 0 ~ CL / [l_ I ··--~. --.. -.. -- =•on IE 24 CONC NE • J•6.1' ' "' ' CUL\/E:f!T IE 18 CONC S • jJH.8 ' ' CONCl't[T£ 801 LYERT tlEV ~ ll:l26 IE 18 ONC W F :l.59.J' ' 'SDl.11-l f7658 -j I i I IE 18 CSE:~ 357.7' "*-364.21 I[ 18" C NW; 357.7' ' ' "' ' ' L . ' ' "' -l I ! I tTA a»IBINED D£1[N nOH AND ll£TPOCI. VAUl T FG El£Y.=J84± MAX w.i £I.£v.•JB0.S 11,Q n£V.=J72.0 sor;ro,,, ElEV.•J67.o ' ' '~·, "' ' ' 1" I ' ' IE12' ' "' ' ' " I I I I I I \ I \ i . ' jf~""' .s,, . -ss '" ~~t~ if: 1 --1-J --·05··---_---, ca 17:iiil ____ l [ ---~ fl /j I/ ' / I.' ( RLI.I • ,l9:l.97 u I[ 24" P,,P E ] IE 12" CONC N i; WATER IN srnucruRE 1· ELEV OJ WATER UVEL • J91.J I 1··, I ' . \ \ \l ___ __J / / CB f7074 Rlt,I • J84.J4' / / / .;! / I[ 12" CONC SE•J7B..I' ' I[ 12" CONC SW-J7flo' ,y/ // {I / / .:,/ ./ < ./ ' \ \\ ~ ' "" STA, JJ2+!l.:;C3 C:.LC. (SP,. ">B~.oc, ll'SOCm ~JS Ll!i[ P.G.1. 0+00 • ' ' \ \ \ \ / Ji I i I CB M7J12 / . . . ·,~l ··~i '1 ~' I • \ \ ca 111~ RII,! F J96.60 I[ 12" CONC SE•J92.2' IE 12" CONC N•J92.1' N_ EN QJLV[RT NOT FOUNq (BURIED UNDER DEBRIU Rll,I " 396.99 IE 12" CONC 192.•' IE 12" CONC N •J924' TBM-A TIJP Of' THRU ATE ELEV • J97.02' J I I.Li u; §! "( i!: I I~ - ~· h~ NW :,•..,. ~p [ ' ~- I I I I I I L 0 HORIZ. NOTB: I, ALL PROPOSED STC:RM CCW\£YliNCf" PIP£ MTHIN TH£ RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL 8£ 12• DMMETER, UNl£S5 NOTED 0THERIWS£ 2. PROPOSED ON-SITE STORM CCW\£YANCE PfPE SHALL B£ A MINJMUM OF 8" DIAMETER. UNLESS NOTED OTH£R1WSE. J. S1R£A&I CROSSING lU.\.£RTS SHALL B£ CORRUGATED MfTN.. ~ PIP£ @ " ., IN FEET ~ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-80M2 .. 5555 .,_..,. ..... --.... ··-- 61~ ~I~ ~ I ~ Ii Ii EXPIRE511ml wi- (!) r5 o::;;; -g; z: 0:: -' ~ ~~ 0~ LU (!) Oz ~ 0:: <{ CJ~ <( a: (!) ::, Cl z8 ~ -z a: O::z ~ c.. ::i Cf) a. Cf) cuoo ALEX CUGINI z ~ 0 z • ~ z ~ ~ 0 5 C/0 CENTURYPACIFIC, LP 1201 THIRD AVE. #1680, SEAmE, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 757--8890 FAX: (206) 757-7890 CPIH CONSULTANTS •P-.·1111.,,.... _..,...i. .......... m1111-. .. wo ----------PROJECT NO. CJOOS07.(JJ3 """"' FIGURE 6 sem_1_~_1_ I I •••••••••••••••~@~•••••~~•@•~••••••••~••••••I CPH CONSULTANTS APPENDICES Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management Land Development Consulting CPH CONSULTANTS APPENDIX A DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Site Planning Civil Engineering Proiect Management Land Development Consulting • OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURF ACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQIBREMENT #2 Basin; l,}lack River Drainage Basin Subbasin Name; Springbrook Ridge Suhbasin Number; 1 -:~Y")~OI: ; --~~f ~~tt~i:e~;-~~~~t;~~~V.et[tF~!~: ;!~~::; ~i~~:::e_~ ~~~~~i~~~t~~~ ~-;~~~:~~:~ ~~f:!:.~~~i~;.;:s~~: ~~-- ·--"~TYpe;;:sheetf1,0w,~~wa1e;~: ~~dr3if!~9e)5a_sin,_~X'~9~~tiOri;, ~ f;:-Jt,"~~,;i~9ti_~n~;"l!!1d~(GaP.pt:j1)::_· P,_?~-~LOg;\J? -i: ~trib __ l,!~fY,?~~~~ !-i~E:lth?"~ of pi"obl~m;·,.,_:; ," --~str8asp, c_~?lnnel~j)ipe;·-.,: .-;::~covef,:d_epttJ,:lype _of;sens_itive'-; ~-" _ , ~iovert_oppirfQ;Jlooding;'ha~j~t or_orgailiSm:'.":;'. '{,ZQ_V_erfl9_W_pa,µ,wa}'s~.~potential impac_ts ·· !:- ·]~n:t~~~-~~~=~t~r:;:f_:--~--)~;-· ~r~i: Vo,.i,~nl~~~t-:~:::,: ~:~;,1t:titti~~;~~~ir~~;;:t~0~~1~~~;~_-:: ~'-;~~,--l~:7/J::~;, -~~ -~-;7:: ;-~~!. Seasonal stream, Moderately dense forest 1-5% 0-8 None Erosion Collects in catch basin approx 5 ft width and underbrush adjacent to SR 515 2 I 18" concrete pipe flowl Existing storm drainage I 3-5% I 8-151 I None I Sedimentation I None system 3 I 18" concrete culvert Existing storm drainage 1-2% 151-311 None Backwatering, -l Erosion at pipe outfall crossmg system Clogging 4 I Swale/ditch Second growth and native 1-5% 311-726 Erosion Erosion Erosion of tree roots, trash in ground cover channel 5 I RocksJined sump w/ Sump to collect channel -726 None Overtopping, Recently constructed facility vault into roadway pipe system trash to address previous flooding 6 I 18" HOPE pipe Existing storm drainage 1-10% 726-1868 None Backwatering, Constructed recently w/ Cedar system Clogging A venue development 7 I Wetland I Wet pool and native -1868 None Flooding None vegetation 8 - 9 10 t Iii Iii ~ 3S :11\Y 14.tlOI ~ ~ t) l: ~ ~ ... bJ 81 ' r ;t -~ 'IS '!AV HJ 'olO. 3S 31\'1''4.!IOI ec:-.s'O"' o~ s<; B . 0 a: ~ a: tlfl -( ""' ~ ~ A,,..(, 0 1111 fri UI "' ~( r:I> In Iii I eli Iii t ~14,t.Sf If' l ~ .! 3S 31\Y '4J.IOI J:f ,;f ~+ tn '~ ~, ·-ii,, tn >. -hi, cu 3S 31\Y '4.lSl)I C Iii n!I c( Q 6J ~ C E bl s C 1j!t l cu !IS 31\Y '4JIOI S31\YW<B:> ., ! ~ .., h~i tn C V) l!f \ ~ Ujl 1 3 ~a~ "' 0 C 'it1 I S 31\Y '1Yn S31\'l'STQM ~,11 j i :r: I IL Iii lo i j i " Ill WW.SAVES ID n -i I ; "' .., Ill fa\( J S .1:> J.131NVl"III ~iU I ,t ~ I liil I 0 I-u & !+ % ) 5 IM a "' ;;. ~ 1 ~ S:t,IY~ ) ' ~ l ) ) \ ) '1 ) Downstream Analysis legend ,--• Courey Bouneiary ;Y streams A·1 Alsdettllll.~•OU --X Mounta n Peak! D Triba Lands R-4 Rosdtntlll, .a DU -atJ'II Hid"iways Parcel!! R-t Asde'lt.tll. ~ DU '"" .... - 1" FDf'!!tt Producti~ D Partn A-a Al,sde,i.1111. a OU <>a aoe District &.Junda-y Unln<:orpora~d K•: C A-1~ • Rmidon1-1~ 0 J - Zor1ing - /./ Agricul:ural ProdttC:ion D A·U · Rasxlon1ult 1f DJ '4W Cl•trii.t &)unff-y - A-1( · Aa''lrlllllni C11M1 OU • • !!' · R.asxlontllll 2" 0 J pa ,, lkban GnMthArM Uie ,._ • !! · Resod•_. « DJ f'O' D A-!!· .lQ,cel•• -ou - ;V ln1.-,nonlted Mi "-rm NB · Ntlgh~ BIIIII'-• F . F'OftSI . streets D M -Mir..t • CB ·COCTW'P11nly3- lhgtMr AA -2.! • l:u.11U.1a. &Cit OU ,a • RB · R-v-o-' luutan Mo,as SIICIIIC • O ·Offai D :.:-Rural,.__,)U-! LOGIC I • lmhm.11111 • AA -16 Aur~u ..... -oJi-er D ui!le1 antJ Large ~i ·,en u--~ r-UR · UitMn ·-19.ono l)U- fc~I lnck.ided on this mep ha been oomplled by King County iiilfl' from• vartatyohowCN and ls lllbled lo change wlifioilt notice. King Cciiity makel no r11p1Ne1allol• or __...,~or lmplad, •lo~.~~. or riglD lo lhe 1a1 al IUCh hlbm111ion. thit doc:ument la not ll'lllnded for iae • • swwy product. King Col.rlly lhllll not be llable for -, ~. spKia. lndlrect. ·1nc:idafal, or ~ dlimllgN Including, but not llmitlild lo, loll _.. or loll proffls ~ ftom the iae or ml.-al the k,b 11lllliol, conllllned on !NI ,rap. /4rr'y ule atthla fflllP or h1Ju 111111io1, on 1111a mep la prohlJllld umpt by wrltllirl pennlalon af Klng Cou,ty. DIiie: 11/25l2008 Source: King Col.rlly IMAP • Property lnfomlllllon (http://www.mecrolcc.gov,'GISIIMAP) UI King County iMAP SEIMTHST S27n4ST \ s1"~c-t t \ t "' 9,#C,~ q $ .,,.~ P\. ~ \JI 6~c,' SE ltlfHST SE28'01 ST S'1STST S31STCT I:» ·· -~ SUl'OiPI. I SE J•SI S1 S321N0Pl $DIDST I'" / pg tQ King County Eblf ;121Cl1Cl11911Ulllll1Tpvd ;IL)oh!OpvowjHBQ.ITlPI" xblf •ll 1111,'etu/n I• ~.IQNIIQ' ) iMAP Legend I Highlighted Feature # Incorporated Area " Selected Parcels Streets The Buffer tf19tlway ,., County Boundary AJtm,1111 X Mountain Peaks L.oc:at .. Drainage Studies Parcels • Neighborhood Drainage ,, Urban Growth Area Line ,---Projects D Lakes and Large Rivers • Regional Stormwater Facilities ;./ Streams • Residential Stormwater m Drainage Complaints Facilities • Commercial Stormwater Facilities Highways lQ King County ,,_...,_ /- ../ ) iMAP -Sensitive Areas Ill i t :a I -I - IJ/ i tll ! % i i sc1nNOST ~~------.., 'S3-1, (>. --·:-.i::::1>.s rt+ + I I I I L-:1:-±..i.. --~-- \ ,: ~ ......... .,..:----.....--~\ tJI _ _______./' •, •.. '-uw ,c • • t. B :· ·.. ~ i ew ;1211111111et1111111t!Tpvd ;tLJohtDpyowJN Ba.!Tf otjy,t 11101 ,~ ,aq;lk xxfn 1 ~ ~QNea :I) 0 ~ SIE Xl1l4 Pt. z 0 :I) z j SI:. l'SI S I JJ :I) ~ < SE 1 JIIJTH ST :i: .. ' GI en % (JI <i 0 ,, (JI en Si:. 'M IH SI SC Ul!l'Ttl PL tit « I ~ 3 % ~ PO UI King County jNBQ Legend 111 Highlighted Feature lh9hwy j'/ Streams -, County Boundary Al'IBT111s ffl SAO Coal Mine '-X Mountain Peaks I.Dal SAO Erosion CAO Shor-eline Condition Parcels ~ thun SAO Stream ~ Medium ': Clint ~ Low C tns 2 Ptnnn 111 Highways # C Ins 2 Salmon II ;V Incorporated Area j'/ Class 3 Streets .. Undanlal (cont~ D Lakes and Large Rivers U1 King County Ebel ;121Cl1Cl1191111111111Tpvd ;IL)ohlOpYOllljNIIQ.ITI otjy,t IIWbC 1)1 ~u/n 11411 ~QNBC1 CPH CONSULTANTS APPENDIX B RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY CALCULATIONS Site Planning Civil Engineering Project Management land Development Consulting Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Orifice# 1 2 Height (ft) 0.00 5.00 Top Notch Weir: Length: Weir Height: Outflow Rating Curve: Stage Elevation Detention Vault 50.00 52.00 2600. 8.50 0.00 22100. 8.50 18.00 2 Diameter (in) 0.60 1. 25 Rectangular 1. 00 8.00 None Storage ft ft sq. ft ft ft cu. ft ft inches Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.028 0.079 in ft Pipe Diameter (in) 4.0 Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 26. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.02 0.02 52. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.03 0.03 78. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.04 0.04 104. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.05 0.05 130. 0.003 0.002 0.00 0.22 0.22 572. 0.013 0.005 0.00 0.38 0.38 988. 0.023 0.006 0.00 0.55 0.55 1430. 0.033 0.007 0.00 0.72 0. 72 1872. 0.043 0.008 0.00 0.88 0.88 2288. 0.053 0.009 0.00 1. 05 1. 05 2730. 0.063 0.010 0.00 1.22 1. 22 3172. 0.073 0.011 0.00 1. 38 1. 38 3588. 0.082 0.011 0.00 1. 55 1. 55 4030. 0.093 0.012 0.00 1. 72 1. 72 4472. 0 .103 0. 013 0.00 1. 88 1. 88 4888. 0 .112 0. 013 0.00 2.05 2.05 5330. 0.122 0.014 0.00 2.22 2.22 5772. 0 .133 0.015 0.00 2.38 2.38 6188. 0.142 0.015 0.00 2.55 2.55 6630. 0.152 0.016 0.00 2.72 2.72 7072. 0.162 0.016 0.00 2.88 2.88 7488. 0.172 0.017 0.00 3.05 3.05 7930. 0.182 0.017 0.00 3.22 3.22 8372. 0.192 0.018 0.00 3.38 3.38 8788. 0.202 0.018 0.00 3.55 3.55 9230. 0.212 0.018 0.00 3.72 3. 72 9672. 0.222 0.019 0.00 3.88 3.88 10088. 0.232 0.019 0.00 4.05 4.05 10530. 0.242 0.020 0.00 13a..sin A Aro-V-+ t'\d ~'~ . 4.22 4.22 10972. 0.252 0.020 0.00 4.38 4.38 11388. 0.261 0.020 0.00 4.55 4.55 11830. 0.272 0.021 0.00 4.72 4. 72 12272. 0.282 0.021 0.00 4.88 4.88 12688. 0.291 0.022 0.00 5.00 5.00 13000. 0.298 0.022 0.00 5.01 5.01 13026. 0.299 0.022 0.00 5.03 5.03 13078. 0.300 0.023 0.00 5.04 5. 04 13104. 0.301 0.025 0.00 5.05 5.05 13130. 0.301 0.027 0.00 5.07 5.07 13182. 0.303 0.030 0.00 5.08 5.08 13208. 0.303 0.034 0.00 5.09 5.09 13234. 0.304 0.035 0.00 5.10 5 .10 13260. 0.304 0.036 0.00 5.27 5.27 13702. 0.315 0.044 0.00 5.44 5.44 14144. 0.325 0.051 0.00 5.60 5.60 14560. 0.334 0.056 0.00 5.77 5. 77 15002. 0.344 0.061 0.00 5.94 5. 94 15444. 0.355 0.065 0.00 6.10 6.10 15860. 0.364 0.069 0.00 6.27 6.27 16302. 0.374 0.072 0.00 6.44 6.44 16744. 0.384 0.076 0.00 6.60 6.60 17160. 0.394 0.079 0.00 6.77 6.77 17602. 0.404 0.082 0.00 6.94 6. 94 18044. 0.414 0.085 0.00 7.10 7 .10 18460. 0.424 0.088 0.00 7.27 7.27 18902. 0.434 0.090 0.00 7.44 7.44 19344. 0.444 0.093 0.00 7.60 7.60 19760. 0.454 0.095 0.00 7.77 7.77 20202. 0.464 0.098 0.00 7.94 7.94 20644. 0.474 0.100 0.00 8.00 8.00 20800. 0.478 0.101 0.00 8.06 8.06 20956. 0.481 0.106 0.00 8.13 8 .13 21138. 0.485 0 .111 0.00 8.19 8.19 21294. 0.489 0 .117 0.00 8.25 8.25 21450. 0.492 0.125 0.00 8.31 8.31 21606. 0 .496 0 .134 0.00 8.38 8.38 21788. 0.500 0.144 0.00 8.44 8.44 21944. 0.504 0.155 0.00 8.50 8.50 22100. 0.507 0.166 0.00 8.60 8.60 22360. 0.513 0.629 0.00 8.70 8.70 22620. 0.519 1. 480 0.00 8.80 8.80 22880. 0.525 2.570 0.00 8.90 8.90 23140. 0.531 3.870 0.00 9.00 9.00 23400. 0.537 5.340 0.00 9.10 9.10 23660. 0.543 6.760 0.00 9.20 9.20 23920. 0 .549 7.290 o.oo 9.30 9.30 24180. 0.555 7.790 0.00 9.40 9.40 24440. o .. 561 8.250 0.00 9.50 9.50 24700. 0.567 8.690 0.00 9.60 9.60 24960. 0.573 9.100 0.00 9.70 9.70 25220. 0.579 9.500 0.00 9.80 9.80 25480. 0.585 9.880 0.00 9.90 9.90 25740. 0.591 10.250 0.00 10.00 10.00 26000. 0.597 10.610 0.00 10.10 10.10 26260. 0.603 10.950 0.00 10.20 10.20 26520. 0.609 11.280 0.00 10.30 10.40 10.30 10.40 26780. 27040. 0.615 11.600 0.621 11.920 0.00 0.00 Inflow Outflow Storage Hyd 1 2 Target Cale Peak Stage 8.51 8.19 6.99 Elev 8.51 8.19 6.99 6.74 5.64 5 .18 4.92 3.05 (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.62 0.16 0.22 0.31 ******* 0.12 0.37 ******* 0.09 0.39 ******* 0.33 ******* 0.32 ******* 0.25 ******* 0.27 ******* 0.08 6.74 0.06 5.64 0.04 5.18 0.02 4.92 0.02 3.05 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:basina_post.tsf Outflow Time Series File:vaultA_out 22128. 21302. 18167. 17529. 14667. 13457. 12791. 7918. Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: 0.618 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 0.216 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 8.51 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 8.51 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 22128. Cu-Ft 0.508 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:vaulta_out.tsf 0.508 0.489 0. 417 0.402 0.337 0.309 0.294 0.182 9 in Year 8 9 in Year 8 Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 0.005 0.008 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.021 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.035 0.038 0. 041 0.044 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.061 0.064 0.067 0. 071 0.074 0.077 0.080 0.084 29411 8260 8767 6203 3396 2854 1654 363 24 13 7 40 42 30 25 27 21 26 11 23 19 10 14 12 12 11 47.963 13.470 14.297 10 .116 5.538 4.654 2.697 0.592 0.039 0.021 0. 011 0.065 0.068 0. 04.9 0. 041 0.044 0.034 0.042 0.018 0.038 0.031 0.016 0.023 0.020 0.020 0.018 4 7. 963 61.433 75.731 85.846 91.385 96. 039 98.736 99.328 99.367 99.388 99.400 99.465 99.534 99.583 99.623 99.667 99.702 99.744 99.762 99.799 99.830 99.847 99.870 99.889 99.909 99.927 52.037 38.567 24.269 14.154 8.615 3.961 1. 264 0 .672 0.633 0.612 0.600 0.535 0.466 0. 417 0.377 0.333 0.298 0.256 0.238 0.201 0.170 0.153 0.130 0 .111 0.091 0.073 0.520E+OO 0.386E+OO 0.243E+OO 0.142E+OO 0.862E-01 0.396E-01 0.126E-01 0. 672E-02 0.633E-02 0.612E-02 0.600E-02 0.535E-02 0.466E-02 0.417E-02 0.377E-02 0.333E-02 0.298E-02 0.256E-02 0.238E-02 0.201E-02 0.170E-02 0.153E-02 0.130E-02 0. lllE-02 0.913E-03 0.734E-03 0.087 10 0.016 99.943 0.057 0. 571E-03 0.090 12 0.020 99.962 0.038 0.375E-03 0.093 6 0.010 99.972 0.028 0.277E-03 0.097 4 0.007 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.100 5 0.008 99.987 0. 013 0 .130E-03 0.103 3 0.005 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.107 0 0.000 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.110 1 0.002 99.993 0.007 0.652E-04 0 .113 2 0.003 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 0 .116 1 0.002 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 Dutation Comparison Anaylsis Base File: basina_pre.tsf New File: vaulta out.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability Base 0.026 0.95E-02 0.64E-02 -32.6 I 0.95E-02 0.026 0.034 0.63E-02 0.61E-02 -3.9 I 0.63E-02 0.034 0. 041 0.49E-02 0.47E-02 -4.6 I 0.49E-02 0. 041 0.048 0.37E-02 0.37E-02 -1. 3 I 0.37E-02 0.048 0.056 0.29E-02 0.28E-02 -2.8 I 0.29E-02 0.056 0.063 0.22E-02 0.21E-02 -5.2 I 0.22E-02 0.063 0.070 0.15E-02 0.15E-02 5.6 I 0.15E-02 0.070 0.077 0.99E-03 O.llE-02 9.8 I 0.99E-03 0.077 0.085 0.62E-03 0.65E-03 5.3 I 0.62E-03 0.085 0. 092 0.34E-03 0.31E-03 -9.5 I 0.34E-03 0.092 0.099 0.21E-03 0.15E-03 -30.8 I 0.21E-03 0.099 0.107 0.16E-03 0.82E-04 -50.0 I 0.16E-03 0.107 0.114 0.98E-04 0.33E-04 -66.7 I 0.98E-04 0 .114 0.121 0.16E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.16E-04 0.121 Maximum positive excursion= 0.002 cfs ( 2.7%) occurring at 0.079 cfs on the Base Data:basina_pr~.tsf and at 0.081 cfs on the New Data:vaulta_out.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.009 cfs (-28.4%) occurring at 0.031 cfs on the Base Data:basina_pre.tsf and at 0.022 cfs on the New Data:vaulta out.tsf New %Change 0.022 -16.9 0.028 -16.2 0.040 -3.6 0.048 -0.8 0.055 -1. 2 0.062 -1. 4 0. 071 1. 6 0.079 1. 9 0.085 0.8 0.091 -1. 4 0.097 -2.1 0.099 -7.3 0.103 -9.8 0 .117 -3.2 Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Detention Vault 45.00 ft 45.00 ft 2025. sq. 9.00 ft 0.00 ft 18225. cu. 9.00 ft ft ft 18.00 inches 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice# Height (ft) 0.00 5.00 Diameter Discharge Diameter 1 2 Top Notch Weir: Length: Weir Height: Outflow Rating Curve: Stage Elevation (in) 0.60 1. 20 Rectangular 1. 00 8.50 None Storage (CFS) (in) a. 029 0.078 4.0 in ft Discharge (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 a. 0.000 0.000 0.01 0.01 20. 0.000 0.001 0.02 0.02 41. 0.001 0.001 0.03 0.03 61. 0.001 0.002 0.04 0.04 81. 0.002 0.002 a.as 0.05 101. 0.002 0.002 0.23 0.23 466. a. 011 0.005 0.40 0.40 810. 0.019 0.006 0.58 0.58 1175. 0.027 0.007 0.76 0.76 1539. 0.035 0.009· 0.93 0.93 1883. 0.043 0.009 1.11 1.11 2248. 0.052 0.010 1. 29 1. 29 2612. 0.060 0.011 1. 46 1.46 2957. 0.068 0.012 1. 64 1. 64 3321. 0.076 0.012 1. Bl 1. 81 3665. 0.084 0.013 1.99 1. 99 4030. 0.093 0.014 2.17 2.17 4394. 0.101 0.014 2.34 2.34 4739. 0.109 0.015 2.52 2.52 5103. a .111 0.016 2.70 2.70 5468. 0.126 0.016 2.87 2.87 5812. 0.133 0.017 3.05 3.05 6176. 0.142 0.017 3.23 3.23 6541. 0.150 0.018 3.40 3.40 6885. 0.158 0.018 3.58 3.58 7250. 0.166 0.018 3.76 3.76 7614. 0:175 0.019 3.93 3.93 7958. 0.183 0.019 4.11 4.11 8323. 0.191 0.020 4.29 4.29 8687. 0.199 0.020 Percolation (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.46 4.46 9032. 0.207 0.021 0.00 4.64 4.64 9396. 0.216 0.021 0.00 4.81 4.81 9740. 0.224 0. 021 0.00 4.99 4.99 10105. 0.232 0.022 0.00 5.00 5.00 10125. 0.232 0.022 0.00 5.01 5.01 10145. 0.233 0.022 0.00 5.02 5.02 10166. 0.233 0.023 0.00 5.04 5.04 10206. 0.234 0.025 0.00 5.05 5.05 10226. 0.235 0.027 0.00 5.06 5.06 10247. 0.235 0. 029 0.00 5.07 5.07 10267. 0.236 0.033 0.00 5.09 5.09 10307. 0.237 0.034 0.00 5.10 5.10 10328. 0.237 0.034 0.00 5 .11 5.11 10348. 0.238 0.035 0.00 5.29 5.29 10712. 0.246 0.043 0.00 5.47 5.47 11077. 0.254 0. 049 0.00 5.64 5.64 11421. 0.262 0.054 0.00 5.82 5.82 11786. 0 .271 0.059 0.00 5.99 5.99 12130. 0.278 0.063 0.00 6.17 6.17 12494. 0.287 0.067 0.00 6.35 6.35 12859. 0.295 0.070 0.00 6.52 6.52 13203. 0.303 0.073 0.00 6.70 6.70 13568. 0 .311 0.076 0.00 6.88 6.88 13932. 0.320 0.079 0.00 7.05 7.05 14276. 0.328 0.082 0.00 7.23 7.23 14641. 0.336 0.085 0.00 7.41 7.41 15005. 0.344 0.087 0.00 7.58 7.58 15350. 0.352 0.090 0.00 7.76 7.76 15714. 0.361 0.092 0.00 7.94 7.94 16079. 0.369 0.094 0.00 8.11 8.11 16423. 0.377 0.097 0.00 8.29 8. 29 16787. 0.385 0.099 0.00 8.47 8.47 17152. 0.394 0.101 0.00 8.50 8.50 17213. 0.395 0.102 0.00 8.56 8.56 17334. 0. 398 0.106 0.00 8.63 8.63 17476. 0.401 0 .111 0.00 8.69 8.69 17597. 0.404 0.117 0.00 8.75 8.75 17719. 0.407 0.125 0.00 8.81 8.81 17840. 0.410 0 .134 0.00 8.88 8.88 17982. 0 .413 0.144 0.00 8.94 8.94 18104. 0.416 0.154 0.00 9.00 9.00 18225. 0. 418 0.166 0.00 9.10 9 .10 18428. 0.423 0.629 0.00 9.20 9.20 18630. 0.428 1.470 0.00 9.30 9.30 18833. 0.432 2.570 0.00 9.40 9.40 19035. 0.437 3.870 0.00 9.50 9.50 19238. 0.442 5.340 0.00 9.60 9.60 19440. 0.446 6.760 0.00 9.70 9.70 19643. 0.451 7.290 0.00 9.80 9.80 19845. 0.456 7.790 0.00 9.90 9.90 20048. 0.460 8.250 0.00 10.00 10.00 20250, 0.465 8.690 0.00 10.10 10.10 20453. 0.470 9.100 0.00 10.20 10.20 20655. 0.474 9.500 0.00 10.30 10.30 20858. 0.479 9.880 0.00 10.40 10.40 21060. 0.483 10.250 0.00 10.50 10.50 21263. 0.488 10.600 0.00 Hyd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10.60 10.70 10.80 10.90 10.60 10.70 10.80 10.90 Inflow Outflow Target Cale 0.54 0.15 0.34 0.28 ******* 0.11 0.32 ******* 0.08 0.35 ******* 0.30 ******* 0.29 ******* 0.22 ******* 0.24 ******* 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.02 21465. 21668. 21870. 22073. Peak Stage 9.04 8.65 7.12 7.14 6.17 5.19 4.69 3.31 0.493 10.950 0.497 11.280 0.502 11.600 0. 507 11. 910 Storage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elev 9.04 8.65 7.12 7.14 6.17 5.19 4.69 3.31 (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 18302. 0.420 17517. 0.402 14416. 14452. 12500. 10515. 9501. 6706. 0.331 0.332 0.287 0. 241 0.218 0.154 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:basinb_post.tsf Outflow Time Series File:vaultB out Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir Elev: Peak Reservoir Storage: 0.541 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 0.342 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 9. 04 Ft 9. 04 Ft 18302. Cu-Ft 0.420 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:vaultb out.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 0.005 0.008 0.011 0. 014 0.017 0.021 0.024 0.027 0.030 0.033 0.036 0.040 0.043 0.046 0.049 0.052 0.055 0.058 0.062 0.065 0.068 o. 071 0.074 31955 52.112 7713 12.578 8386 13. 676 4898 7. 988 3877 6. 323 1813 2.957 1535 2. 503 698 1.138 42 0.068 18 0.029 12 0.020 51 0.083 48 0.078 19 0.031 26 0.042 22 0.036 16 0.026 18 0.029 13 0.021 12 0.020 16 0.026 24 0.039 27 0.044 10 0.016 52 .112 64.690 78.366 86.354 92. 676 95.633 98 .136 99.274 99.343 99.372 99.392 99.475 99.553 99.584 99.627 99.662 99.689 99.718 99.739 99.759 99.785 99.824 99.868 99.884 47.888 35.310 21.634 13.646 7.324 4.367 1. 864 0. 726 0.657 0.628 0.608 0.525 0.447 0. 416 0.373 0.338 0. 311 0.282 0.261 0.241 0.215 0.176 0.132 0 .116 0.479E+OO 0.353E+OO 0.216E+OO 0.136E+OO 0.732E-01 0.437E-01 0.186E-01 0.726E-02 0.657E-02 0.628E-02 0.608E-02 0.525E-02 0.447E-02 0.416E-02 0.373E-02 0.338E-02 0.311E-02 0.282E-02 0.261E-02 0.241E-02 0.215E-02 0.176E-02 0.132E-02 0 .116E-02 0.077 9 0.015 99.899 0.101 O.lOlE-02 0.081 10 0.016 99. 915 0.085 0.848E-03 0.084 16 0.026 99.941 0.059 0.587E-03 0.087 8 0.013 99.954 0.046 0.457E-03 0.090 8 0.013 99.967 0.033 0.326E-03 0.093 4 0.007 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.096 3 0.005 99.979 0.021 0. 212E-03 0.099 5 0.008 99.987 0.013 0.130E-03 0.103 3 0.005 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.106 1 0.002 99.993 0.007 0.652E-04 0.109 2 0.003 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 0 .112 1 0.002 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: basinb_pre.tsf New File: vaultb out.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Cutoff Base New %Change Probability Base 0.026 0.94E-02 0.68E-02 -28.5 I 0.94E-02 0.026 0.033 0.63E-02 0.61E-02 -2.8 I 0.63E-02 0.033 0.040 0.49E-02 0.44E-02 -10.3 I 0.49E-02 0.040 0.047 0.37E-02 0.36E-02 -3.1 I 0.37E-02 0.047 0.054 0.29E-02 0.30E-02 3.4 I 0.29E-02 0.054 0.061 0.22E-02 0.25E-02 11. 0 I 0.22E-02 0.061 0.068 0.15E-02 0.18E-02 18.7 I 0.15E-02 0.068 0.075 O.lOE-02 0. llE-02 9.7 I 0.lOE-02 0.075 0.082 0.62E-03 0.75E-03 21.1 I 0.62E-03 0.082 0.089 0.34E-03 0.36E-03 4.8 I 0.34E-03 0.089 0.096 0.23E-03 0.21E-03 -7.1 I 0.23E-03 0. 096 0.103 0.16E-03 0.82E-04 -50.0 I 0.16E-03 0.103 0.110 O.llE-03 0.33E-04 -71.4 I O.llE-03 0.110 0.117 0.16E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.16E-04 0 .117 Maximum positive excursion= 0.003 cfs { 5.8%) occurring at 0.059 cfs on the Base Data:basinb_pre.tsf and at 0.062 cfs on the New Data:vaultb out.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.006 cfs (-22.4%) occurring at 0.028 cfs on the Base Data:basinb_pre.tsf and at 0.022 cfs on the New Data:vaultb out.tsf Tolerance------- New %Change 0.022 -16.0 0.030 -9.8 0.037 -6.5 0.046 -1.4 0.055 1. 6 0.064 4.7 0.070 2.4 0.077 3.2 0.083 1. 6 0.090 1. 0 0.095 -0.7 0.099 -4.3 0.100 -8.8 0.113 -3.4 I ·1 I •••• I I I I I I I ••• I I I I !I ,I I • a . Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA·· .Transportation Impact Study . ' ' Febn1ary 1 O, 2009. . : Prepared f~r: . . . CP~ Consultants 733 -7th Avenue, Suite 1 o.o Kirkland, WA 9.8033 Prepared by: . ' ~·· Transportation Engin~ering NorthWesi; LLC Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact ·studies + · Transportatlori Planning + Demand:Forecasdng ' ' ' . ·, . Seattle Office: PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 + OfHceif.,; (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (BBB) 220-7333 · · · Eastside Office: 816 · 6ih Stree.t S • Kirkland, WA 98033 I I ., I I I· I I I I· I I I ·1· 1· .I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Table of Contents Transportation Impact Study FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 5 Roadway and Intersection Conditions ................................................................................................ 5 Existing Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................................... 6 Intersection Level of Service .............................................................................................................. 6 Collision History ............................................................................................................................... 11 Public Transportation Services ......................................................................... : ............................... 12 Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities ............................................................................................ 12 Planned Roadway Improvements .................................................................................................... 13 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 13 Non-Project Traffic Forecasts ........................................................................................................... 13 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................ 13 Trip Distribution and Assignment ..................................................................................................... 14 Traffic Volume lmpacts ..................................................................................................................... 14 Future Levels of Service ........................................................... : ....................................................... 14 Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues ..................................................................................... 20 Parking Impacts ............................................................................................................................... 22 Public Transportation lmpacts .......................................................................................................... 23 Nonmotorized Transportation Impacts ............................................................................................. 23 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................................................. 24 Appendix A • Traffic Counts Appendix B • Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections Appendix C • Future Traffic Volume Forecasts ~ Transportation Engineering NonhWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·I I I Sprtngbrook Ridge Renton, WA List of Figures Transportation Impact Study Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................................. .4 Figure 3: Existing Intersection Channelization and Traffic Control. ......................................................... 7 Figure 4: 2008 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................ 8 Figure 5: 2008 Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 9 Figure 6: Project Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................... 15 Figure 7: Daily.Project Trip Assignment... ............................................................................................. 16 Figure 8: P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment .............................................................................. 17 Figure 9: 2010 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts ..................... : .................................................................. 18 Figure 10: 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume lmpacts ..................................................................... 19 List of Tables Table 1: Level of Service Criteria at Intersections ................................................................................. 10 Table 2: 2008 Existing P.M. Peak Intersection Levels of Service ......................................................... 11 Table 3: Historical Collision Rates (Most Recent 3-year Period) .......................................................... 12 Table 4: Net Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 14 Table 5: 2010 P.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service lmpacts ........................................................... 20 Table 6: Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements of Proposed Action ............................................. 22 Table 7: Parking Generation ................................................................................................................. 23 ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page II I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I i I ,I I . i I Sprtngbrook Ridge Renton, WA flND~NGS AND CONCILUSDONS Transportatlon Impact Study Project Proposal. The proposed Springbrook Ridge development would consist of up to 97 apartments in a 4-story building, 17,800 square feet of general office space, and 8,900 square feet of retail space at the northwest comer of the SR 515 / Benson Road S intersection in Renton, Washington. Vehicular access would be provided via six site driveways with three full access driveways onto SE 172"d Street (including two driveways accessing the underground parking garage), one full access north project site driveway onto Benson Road S / 108'h Avenue SE at its intersection with 108"' Way SE, one recommended restricted right-tum in/out only south project site driveway onto Benson Road S, and one restricted right-tum in/ out only driveway onto SR 515. Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2010. Trip Generation. The proposed action would generate an estimated net total of approximately 1,090 daily, 63 a.m. peak hour (37 entering and 26 exiting), and 87 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (38 entering and 49 exiting) at full build-out. Off-Site Study Area Impacts. Intersections #5 -SR 515 at SE 176"' Street would operate at LOS E under 2008 existing and 2010 p.m. peak hour conditions with or without the project. All other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOS D/C or better during the p.m. peak hour with and without the proposed development in 2010. · Site Access Impacts. Entering and exiting movements at all project site driveway intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better with 95"' percentile queue lengths estimated at 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less during the p.m. peak hour in 2010 with the proposed development. Site Access -Sight Distance Impacts. The project developer may need to obtain view easements from two neighbors located to the north of the project site on 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S to improve sight distance at the north project site driveway at its intersection with 108"' Avenue SE/ Benson Road S / 108"' Way S. The first potential view easement would be obtained from the Family Circle Leaming Center. By removing trees/vegetation on their property, sight distance would increase to a minimum of 420 feet. Sight distance should be re- verified after tree/vegetation removal to detertnine if the minimum 445 feet of sight distance standard is met. If required, additional sight distance could be accommodated by obtaining a view easement from the nearest residential neighbor north of SE 172nd Street and removing vegetation on their property. Another potential approach would be to detertnine if the trees/vegetation are located within City of Renton/King County right-of-way and have the appropriate agency maintenance department clear the trees/vegetation. After all necessary vegetation has been removed, there is the potential to obtain a sight distance variance by conducting a speed study to detertnine if a lower 85"' percentile speed can be used as the basis for sight distance requirements. Parking/Transit/Nonmotorized Impacts. The proposed development would be required to provide a minimum of 186 and maximum of 295 off-street parking stalls. There are no anticipated impacts to public transportation services or nonmotorized transportation facilities. Mitigation Payment System. The Springbrook Ridge development will be required to pay $75 per daily vehicle trip (1,090 daily project trips) as part of the City of Renton's Mitigation Payment System ($81,750) towards system improvements that are needed in the site vicinity. ~ Transportadon Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 1 I ,. I ;I ·1 I •• I I I I I I I I I i I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA llNTRODlUICTllON Transportation Impact Study This study summarizes transportation impacts associated with Springbrook Ridge, a proposed mixed-use residential/ commercial development in Renton, WA. This study documents transportation impacts associated with this proposed action, including: ~ Assessment of existing transportation conditions and operations through data collection efforts and field reconnaissance. ~ Estimation of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak vehicular project trip generation. ~ Assignment of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak hour project trips onto the existing roadway network. ~ Evaluation of level of service (LOS) impacts during the p.m. peak hour at eight (8) off- site study intersections and 6 site access intersections. ~ Evaluation of site access, safety, and circulation issues. ~ Assessment of parking, public transportation services and non-motorized facility impacts. ~ Identification of mitigation measures to maintain acceptable levels of mobility and safety based upon City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD01) standards and guidelines. Project Description The proposed Springbrook Ridge development would consist of up to up to 97 apartments in a 4- story building, 17,800 square feet of general office space, and 8,900 square feet of shopping center space at the northwest comer of the SR 515 / Benson Road S intersection in Renton, Washington. A site vicinity map is provided in Figure 1. Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2010. Vehicular access would be provided via six site driveways with three full access driveways onto SE 172"d Street (including two driveways accessing the underground parking garage), one full access north project site driveway onto Benson Road S / 108"' Avenue SE at its intersection with 108'' Way SE, one recommended restricted right-tum in/ out only south project site driveway onto Benson Road S, and one restricted right-tum in/out only driveway onto SR 515. Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2010. A proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 2 I I I I I· I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA SW 7th St ~ 3 V, V > <( "' C ::; SW 41st St S 180th St ~.to. ._,to :,.'$- "' "" "' "" ~ ~ > "' I. ; I/. f',G<>~ ,p ~ ii'c-o_, 4:;, S" '405.i, V S 15th St ..,~ ';; ..... <j« < ,,8.15 ~< i S st St ,.~ \ j :'3rd St ~SE 162ndSt u SE 164th St '; :S ~s,, "<:l. --~\'_~ .... "' V, V .,, = < ~ i -5 M -~ ' -17 nd St ,,..! "' Project I~ ~ "O "' Site • ~ SE 176th St r,..167 0 .,, 7. /;,..3rd t SE Carr R" r~n SE 182nd St V, ,-V > <( SE 186th St V, "' -5 :ii V, co i 0 0 £l "' ' ~ C "' Transportation Impact Study Roya/ H111 'Dr SE ~ ,,. ~ USE:~St ~ Po ,;_ ~ 'fi,. 1 "' "' "' V, V V SE 168th St > < <( ~SEli -5 nd~ co N - ~ ~ "' "' V < -5 "' 0 "' i - -5 "' --0 . -SE 192nd St ,_ 167 I SE 196th St S 198th St ~15 V, S 200th St ~ <( £ S 204th St co I ~ T ransport.:ition Figure 1 Engineering NorthWest, LLC Project Site Vicinity ~ Transponadon Engineering·NorthWert, LLC "' V, ~ <( -5 ... "' -g . . (Not to Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study February 10, 2009 Page J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA / Trans rtadon Impact Study / ~ Source; CPH Consultants, fnc., ]anwry 2009. (Not to ~1~) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ~ T ransPortadon Engineering North West, LLC Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study February 10, 2009 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA IEXHSll"llNG COND11l"ll0NS Transportation Impact Study This section describes existing transportation system conditions in the study area. It includes an inventory of existing roadway conditions, traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, collision history, public transportation services, non-motorized transportation facilities, and planned roadway improvements. Roadway and Intersection Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing arterial roadways that would be used as major routes for site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits and shoulder types and widths. SR 167 is classified by WSDOT as an urban principal arterial. In the vicinity of S 43"' Street, SR 167 consists of 4 general-purpose lanes and 2 high-occupancy vehicle lanes. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. The speed limit is posted at 60 mph. SR 515 is classified by WSDOT as an urban minor arterial. The roadway consists of 4 travel lanes. South of SE 176"' Street, a two-way center left-turn lane is provided. Travel lanes are generally 12 feet with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 45mph. 108"' Avenue SE (Benson Road S) is a two-lane minor arterial with 12-foot travel lanes. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and 6-foot paved shoulders are provided on the south and east side of the street. On the west side and north side of the street, 6-foot paved shoulders are provided north of SE 172nd Street, and curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are located in the vicinity of SR 515. A raised curb with a separated 2-foot paved pathway is located on the north and west side of the street south of SE 172"d Street to 108"' Way SE. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph. SE 172"d Street is a two-lane unchannelized roadway adjacent to the project site. The total pavement width is 34 feet and the speed limit is posted at 25 mph. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are provided on the south side of SE 172"• Street west of 108"' Avenue SE (Benson Road S) and east of the project site. SE 176"' Street in the vicinity of SR 515 is a 4-lane principal arterial with a two-way, center left- turn lane. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. SE 192"d Street is a minor arterial east of SR 515 and collector arterial west of SR 515 two-lane roadway, consisting of 12-foot travel lanes with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along various parts of the roadway. Paved shoulders approximately 4 to 8 feet are provided where there are no curbs/sidewalks. The posted speed limit is 25 mph west of SR 515 and 40 mph east of SR 515. SW Grady Way is a four-lane, east-west principal arterial with a two-way, center left-tum lane. An additional lane in the eastbound direction is generally provided between Lind Avenue SW and Talbot Road S. Travel lanes average 11 feet in width. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are also provided. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page 5 I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Figure 3 summarizes existing channelization and traffic control at the following 8 off-site study intersections and 1 site access intersection: 1. SR515 / S Grady Way 2. SR 515 / S 15"' Street/ S Puget Drive 3. SR 515 / S 21" Street 4. SR 515 / Benson Road S 5. SR 515 / SE 176"' Street 6. SR 515 / SE 192nd Street 7. 108"' Avenue SE / SE 172nd Street 8. SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43"' Street 9. Benson Road S / 108"' Avenue SE/ 108"' Way SE/ North Project Site Driveway-This intersection is currently a T-intersection without the proposed site driveway. !Existing Traffic Volumes Figures 4 and 5 highlight existing year 2008 daily traffic volumes and p.m. peak period turning movements at study roadways and intersections. Average daily traffic volumes (AD1) represent the number of vehicles traveling a roadway segment over a 24-hour period on an average weekday. Peak hour traffic volumes represent the highest hourly volume of vehicles passing through an intersection during a typical 4-6 p.m. peak period. Daily traffic volumes were provided by the City of Renton and WSDOT. All Traffic Data Services, Inc. conducted p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at the 5 study intersections of #1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 in November 2008. All Traffic Data Gathering, Inc. conducted p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at study intersections #5 and #7 in February 2007 (turning movement counts are provided in Appendix A). The City of Renton/WSDOT provided p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at Intersection #3 via a Synchro file. Historical traffic volumes provided by the City of Renton indicate an average growth rate of 1 percent per year between 1996 and 2006 and 2000 to 2006 in the project site vicinity. To estimate a worst case scenario and based on recent traffic studies conducted in the site vicinity, all traffic counts not counted in the year 2008 were factored by 3 percent per year to estimate year 2008 existing conditions. llntersection level of Service Level of service (LOS) serves as an indicator of the quality of traffic flow at an intersection or road segment. The LOS grading ranges from A to F, such that LOS A is assigned when minimal delays are present and low volumes are experienced. LOS F indicates long delays and/ or forced flow. Table 1 summarizes the delay range for each level of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. The methods used to calculate the levels of service are described in the updated 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board). The measure of effectiveness for signalized intersections is average control delay, defined as the total time vehicles are stopped at an intersection approach during a specified time period divided by the number of vehicles departing from the approach in the same time period. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA Transportation Impact Study SW 7th St I/ -f ~ ~ I, I < I J £ S21s!St , '\ _,,,ttr ~r M ---.._ · ~ < I ~fl~~~t ::::;::::::2::~· ·~-J_ __ ]!!,-_J~ J i Pr~ject~· ~ \ ~67 ,g S1te :r.s.._. ~«:t··:::'7~"'.-.·~~~1~~~~~_:_)== _,,,,=.., SW4lstSt .JI ;5/ ~ , ... , SR515/B,osooRdS ~ S 180th St -~J/-ll!'IJ /111 , /, SE Carr R . I I I "- ~~.rd t . tt~ r ~ // Ir~ t,;.J BensonRcJS .--.~-_,.~µ,·//!c,...-1.IL(J/ ~'IS ~1 SR515/SE 176thSt SE 182 © S 43rd St/ ~ v, t ,t.,r ,_ SR 167NBR.amn< ~ ~ r· l 0 !:: ~ 4 l \.. \.. ._ ~ SE 18< ~ ,_ 1>:1 :g J'sE 176111 St ~ ~ +-...... _A O ~ - _,, ' s": ! -~,, tr -~ -li~ r ~ ~ = -+ ~ , • SE 192nd St SRS 15_/ SE 192od St I ~ ,_, ~ _@ {(}! S 198th St 4 ~ ! .c 0: a, .. v' SE 196th St ! i \.. ~ t---t--su 1-s -=-'-=~'.:..-+----1-~! SE 192nd St t . ' -f , t y S 204th St 1-=-=-:""-"'"-J:l-~--1 ' \ Legend ):{ Traffic Signal .a.. Stop Sign ~ (Notto Seate) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 3 Springbrook Ridge Existing Channelization and Traffic Control Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Rldge Renton WA SW 7th St ,I 1/ {su~~ I 34,9001 =-~ j 39 0001 -II 405! 1 =a,:::;=~===i S 15th St' 1 V, ~ [sis ; s 1-1fst ";t ~sl3rd St \ · Transportation Impact Study R . oya/ Hills Dr SE ~SE 162nd St r ~ ~ r::--"-:c:-c;:7 ~ r'~--r,'S~Eil~64~rn~Spt-i---~------,,-t--, 19,4001 ,a. ,, \ ~ ~OIJ, ~ ~ ... _,.... ""'~ ~ SE 168th St ~ ~ ,J> ;~~J___L_~._;f--f-~~c=-:.=-=-'::........,~i\w -f 1 ~--:@j~ w V, w V, > ,., 1~18-,9-o~ol ~ ~ = "' "' 172inct,f-4 19 ,300 1 SE172ndS - V, j 3s,sool ~7 ~ Project V '<iwr I $ ite ~-==~• 1 sL,; SS~EJl !,J7 6~th~S!lat =1-=='i""'====""',p""""' 'lc::i--==l 21,6001 \I ~ ~ SW 41st St \ . ;," I\ SE Carr Rd ~5~1!80~t~h~Sti,~h~/,~~'s~\!3~i:<l~tdF"==""""', . ·'~"" I 33,oool ;,;.-fl Pl ~ ] 51,2001 ~ s,,.:O ,-~ SE 182nd St ~~ ~ ~ £ ~ VI ~ SE 186th St w 167 ,-S 198th St V, ! £ CX) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC . ! \ .-'---,:;::?'_; ~ 34,2001 SE 192nd St SE I 96rn St / 515 ___ _::S.::2c;:.DD::.:rn:.:.c::;St __ .1--;1--- S 204th St -t---'~~~r-----··1 Figure 4 2008 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC ; (Not to Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study February IO, 2009 Page 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton .WA Transportation Impact Study SW 7th St I/ SR 515 / SGradyWy / , c,iao,i~~ •. j.-"fl II i ~ "-.. 43 '~,.....=J.~~Jt.;'.:===--J T 'l ~ -;~; IXH' I ---~i--:"-1sc,Gra[2f•~!:.!"!l:,' ills Dr Sf ' Q»I SRSIS/ '405•• ,-J J'~c,o[jl__jS_ll~St~h S~t~/ S~Pu&"'l!.et!JD1!.r-f::=::=r~"' 58 ~ ~ t (' '--/ t ~ ~ 2Js S 1 Sthst. 6 71 -+-J6o Jo1 263 ~ 551,247 341 Bj .,_ 5 622~ ""-""" ) t \.. r'~---""~,;,-,w,. ~ '"''SI••-" " ts ; .,.-< {SIS~ ~ (ll l108thA,0SE/S::::dSt J s-+ 1 s62 J 1s -gs,fst;c \ ill "--s ' "' I ./ ~ SE 161,tHSt 3~ 61 :h~st 16 334 9 .t .......,, 1_ , I ) t \..~ 9 St -~--~--~", ~/ "•-SI~ ~, SR515/521n5t i-5Y '/; ~ 32 J( ~ t (' 1;; "'-Q 1 I J -+-41 JQ4 8 t---t___J 229 1,18303; -<lf-0 -;) ) t \.. r o "'" SI ~ l'-r-.'-·-.d!ll'"n"r--,-1= •"'" 291 _,, ~ t {' ~7/ ~ 0-+-28 434 0 "t\.\ -I'--t.- le'I Benson Rd S/108th Av, SE V 108th W~ SE ill l69 8 ! "-ll ~ t \..i r' e--'1~""'~·-=·"fl t {' 322 S 76 '< "' S I A:~ St _1--- Proje~ I~ Site l7 :·, SRS15/Bemo,Rd5 ~ "-.. 27 SE Carr Rd 1,030 55 II SW 41st St t.,... r,,..167 ~5=1=8=0t=h=S=t ===;,;,A=;}" ~rd >t , t \., Jr 347 I I -" Benson Rd S / I'~ 4-~I SR515/SE176thSt SE 182 t (' "-' I S 43rd St/ _ DI "-.. "' 1,U~l._l__filSRLJ1~6f-7NliJB!JRa!l.m!!!lnDl!.''-ICJl-l. 134 Q,/ ..-, 401 272 -i,;. 52 1,075 405 ,.._ 570 ~ "' I "-..401 ) t \.. 175 .S SE 186 ~ (5 -+-1,063 VI JI: SE 176th st CO a., ~ ~ 0 < S43roSJ _.& 145_)( "" t (' .--£-'+---4-- J38-1f I'\ t (' ~ 1,156 ..... a192 164 196 ~ 2,032-+ ~ 302 1 3141--+':=:::::;: 9~~"rs::::iiir:===J=':.~J---lSE~l 9?'.!2~;~d~St!.__+---r--- ~ ~---'------o.,I ~~...;.. ~ ,-A. -~,. SR515/SE192ndSt ~ SE l96thSt ~ <~ 1-'<l:...L.--~~"---.-, --L, £ s 198th St SJ 825 2103s -+-48 ~ ) t \., 137 515 Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Jr"" SE192mtSt t 35_;( ~ t {' 258 -+ 28 528 81 S 204th St 1,--,.., I Figure 5 2008 Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes g (Not lo Seate) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study ~ Transportation Engineering NortbWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA Transportation Impact Study Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made of up a number of factors that relate to traffic control, geometries, traffic demand, and incidents. Total control delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions (i.e., the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, or as a result other vehicles). LOS F at signalized intersections is often considered unacceptable to most drivers, but does not automatically imply that the intersection is over capacity. Jammed conditions could occur on one or all approaches, with periods of long delays and drivers waiting for multiple signal cycles to progress through the intersection. For unsignalized intersections, a level of service and estimate of average control delay is determined for each minor or controlled movement based upon a sequential analysis of gaps in the major traffic streams and conflicting traffic movements. In addition, given that unsignalized intersections create different driver expectations and congestion levels than signalized intersections, their delay criteria are lower. Control delay at unsignalized intersections include deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay in waiting for an adequate gap in flows through the intersection, and final acceleration delay. Intersection level of service were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Highwqy Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (TRB), using the Synchm6 and HCS2000 software programs. The level of service standard in the City of Renton is LOS D. LOS standards for regionally significant state highways (non-HSS) in the Central Puget Sound region (ie., SR-515) were adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) on October 30, 2003. For urban areas the adopted LOS standard ranges from LOS E/mitigated (p.m. peak hour LOS is below the traditional LOS E) to the traditional LOS D. LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) (i.e., SR 167) have been adopted in 1998 by the WSDOT. For urban areas the adopted LOS standard is equivalent to the traditional LOS D. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria at Intersections Signalized Intersect/on Unslgnalized Intersection Level of Service Delav Range (sec) Delay Range (sec) A <10 :5 10 B > 10tos20 > lOtos 15 C > 20 to< 35 > 15 to,; 25 D > 35 to :5 55 > 25 to< 35 E > 55 to,; 80 > 35 to,; 50 F "80 "50 .. .. Source: Highway Capacity Manual , Special Report 209, 1ransportAl:10n Research Board, 2000, Update . Existing p.m. peak hour levels of service at study intersections are summarized in Table 2. Intersection #5 -SR 515 at SE 176th Street currently operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. All other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized . intersections operate at LOS D / C or better under existing conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Table 2: 2008 Existing P.M. Peak Intersection Levels of Service Control Level of Shmallzed Intersections Type Service #1 -SR 515 / S GradyWy Signal D #2 -SR 51 5 / S 1 5th St I S Puget Dr Signal C #3 -SR 515 / S 21" St Signal C #4 -SR 51 5 / Benson Rd S Signal A #5-SR 515 / SE 176th St Signal E #6 -SR 515 / SE 19 2"' St Signal D #7 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43"' St Signal D Control Level of Unslgnalized Intersections Type Service #8 -I 08th Ave SE/ SE 172'' St EB C WB C NB Left A SB Left A #9 -Benson Rd S / 108th Ave SE/ WB B 108th Way SE SB Left A Transportation Impact Stud)'. Average Delay 37 28 21 9 68 37 41 Average Delay 16 16 8 8 11 8 Note: Analysis based on Synchro 6, Tm.Ifie Signal Coordinatzon Software and HCS2000 results us111g HCM 2000 control delays (seconds) and LOS. Collision History The frequency and severity of collisions are commonly weighted against the speed, volwne, and functional classification of a roadway segment or intersection. These variables are considered in determining if a certain location has an unusually high collision rate or unsafe condition. The average annual collision rate is calculated by swnming the total nwnber of collisions that occurred at a specified intersection or roadway segment during the past three years, and dividing the total by three. At intersections, collision rates are also ~easured per million entering vehicles (mev), which reflects the nwnber of vehicles traveling through an intersection, providing a different indication of design-related versus volwne-related incidences. In general, intersections with less than 5 collisions per year m a collision rate less than 2.0 mev are not considered high collision locations. Historical collision data was provided by King for the most recent 3-year period between October 1, 2005 and September 30, 2008 and by WSDOT for the most recent 3-year period between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007. As shown in Table 3, Intersections #1 -SR 515 / S Grady Way, #5 -SR 515 / S 176"' Street, and #7 -SR 167 Northbound Ramps / S 43"' Street reported average annual collision rates ranging between 7 to 12 collisions per year. A majority of collisions at these intersections were due to rear-end accidents, which may be attributed to the high traffic volumes traveling through the intersections, negligent driving, drivers failing to yield, and drivers following too closely. All study intersections experienced less than 1.00 per mev. Therefore, with the high number of vehicles traveling through the intersections, they are not considered high collision locations. ~ Transpcrtatlon Engineering NonhWest, LLC February t 0, 2009 Pagett I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA Table 3: Historical Collision Rates (Most Recent 3-year Period) Intersections Fatalities Injuries PDO 111 -SR 515 / S GradyWy1 0 18 21 1/2 -SR 515 / S 15\h St/ S Puget Dr 1 0 13 13 113 -SR 515 / S 21 • St 1 0 3 2 114-SR 515 / Benson Rd 51 0 4 12 115 -SR 515 I SE 176\h St 1 0 24 34 116 -SR 515 / SE 192" St 1 0 13 13 117 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43'' St' 0 12 24 118 -108" Ave SE / SE 1 72"' St' 0 2 1 1/9 -Benson Rd S / I 08th Ave SE/ I 08\h Wav SE' 0 0 0 Transportation Impact Study Average Colllslon Total Annual Rate per Colllslons Collision Rate MEY. 39 7.00 0.51 26 4.33 0.46 5 0.67 0.08 16 4.00 0.51 58 11.33 0.67 26 4.33 0.50 36 8.00 0.49 3 0.33 0.11 0 0 0 .. 1 -WSDOT Collision Records Standard Accident Hzstory Detatl R.eport., 3-year pcnod between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007, Data Collected November 2008. 2-King County Records Co!lirion S11111mary, 3-year period between October 1, 2005 and September 30, 2008, Data Collected January 2009. 3 -MEV -11i.l.lion entering vehicles. · !Public Transportation Services King County-Metro transit routes 155, 161 and 169 stop at the intersection of SR 515 and SE 176ili Street. The transit stops are located within 1,000 feet of the proposed site. King County- Metro offers dial-a-ride, rideshare, and ridematch services. Accessible transit services are also offered to citizens with disabilities. Bicycle racks are provided on the front of most King County-Metro buses. Route 155 provides service Monday to Saturday between Southcenter and Renton. Weekday service is provided from 5:35 a.m. until 6:35 p.m. Saturday service runs between 8:35 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Transit service stops average every hour. Route 161 provides peak morning and peak afternoon/ evening service on weekdays between Downtown Seattle, Tukwila, Kent and Renton. Weekday service to Downtown Seattle is provided from 5:50 a.m. until 8:05 a.m. every half hour. Weekday service from Downtown Seattle arrives at the transit stop on S 43"' Street/S Carr Road between 4:25 p.m. and 6:35 p.m. every half hour. Route 169 provides daily service every half hour between Renton and Kent. Weekday service is provided from 5:00 a.m. until 11 :40 p.m. Saturday service runs between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :40 p.m. Sunday service is provided from 7 :00 a.m. until 11 :30 p.m. Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities Raised sidewalks are located on SR 515, SE 176"' Street, on the south and east side of _108ili Avenue SE (Benson Road S), and on the south side of SE 172"d Street west of 108ili Avenue SE (Benson Road S) and east of the project site. A raised curb with a separated 2-foot paved pathway is located on the no1th and west side of 108ili Avenue SE (Benson Road S) south of SE 172•d Street to 108ili Way SE. Paved shoulders are also provided on 108ili Avenue SE (Benson Road S). ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA Planned Roadway Improvements Transportation Impact Study A review of planned transportation improvements in the City of Renton's 2009-2014 Transportation Improve111ent Progra111 (TIP) and WSDOT's Highway, Ferry and Rail Construction and Improvement Projects list was conducted in the project vicinity. No transportation improvement projects were identified that would be impacted by the proposed development. 1f'IRANSIPOIRTATION IMIPACT ANAlYSRS The following section describes transportation impacts the proposed Springbrook Ridge development would have on the surrounding arterial network and critical intersections in the site vicinity. The discussion includes non-project related traffic forecasts, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, impacts on roadways, levels of service at nearby significant intersections, site access, circulation, and safety issues, parking, public transportation services, and non-motorized facilities. Non-Project Traffic forecasts For the purpose of this traffic analysis, year 2010 was selected as the build-out year based upon anticipated completion of the Springbrook Ridge development. As previously identified, an average growth rate of 3 percent per year was used to factor existing traffic volumes to estimate year 2010 baseline conditions without the proposed development. In addition to the 3 percent annual background growth rate, the following pipeline projects were added to existing conditions to determine 2010 traffic volumes without the project: 1. Valley Center Medical Building expansion on the northwest comer of the S 43'd Street and Talbot Road S intersection. 2. Valley Center development would construct up to 218,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities (day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.) at the southeast comer of the S 43n1 Street and Davis Avenue S intersection in Renton, Washington. An existing 6,500 square foot general office building would be removed as part of the development. Trip Generation The Springbrook Ridge development would consist of a total site build-out of up to 97 apartments in a 4-story building, 17,800 square feet of general office space, and 8,900 square feet of shopping center space. Trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 8"' Edition, 2008, were used to estimate trips generated by the proposed project. Average trip rates were used to estimate net new trips generated by the proposed development during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour for Mid-Rise Apartment (ITE land use code 223) and daily trips for Apartment (ITE land use code 223), and daily, a.m. and p.m. peak trips for General Office (ITE land use code 710) and Shopping Center (ITE land use code 820), as summarized in Table 4. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study A net total of approximately 1,090 daily, 63 a.m. peak hour (3 7 entering and 26 exiting), and 87 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (38 entering and 49 exiting) would be generated. at full build-out. Table 4: Net Project Trip Generation A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Dally Trlp ITE Land Trlp Generation Trlp Generation Generation Land Use Use Code Size' Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Mid-Rise Apartment 223 97 DU 9 20 29 22 16 48 .. Apartment 220 .. .. .. . . .. . . 645 General Office 710 17.8 25 3 28 5 22 27 195 GFA Shopping Center 820 8.9 GLA 5 4 9 16 17 43 380 Net Total Trip Generation 39 27 66 43 55 98 1,220 Less Shopping Center Pass-by Trips (3496) -2 ·1 -3 -5 -6 -11 -130 Net Total Trlp Generation 37 26 63 38 49 87 1,090 -. Source: ITE Trrp Genera/ton Manlltl!, gm Editmn, 2008. 1 -DU is Dwelling Unit, GF A is 1,000 square feet per gross floor area, and GLA is 1,000 square feet per gross leasable area. Trip Distribution and Assignment Based upon historical traffic volumes and patterns and the regional housing and employment distribution within the area, peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed action would be distributed as follows: )> 45 percent northerly via SR 167, I-405, SR 515, S Grady Way, and 108"' Avenue SE (Benson Road S). )> 20 percent southerly via SR 167 and SR 515. )> 15 percent westerly via S 180"' Street. )> 20 percent easterly via SE 176"' Street and SE 192nd Street. Project trip distribution is shown in Figure 6 and project trip assignment is illustrated m Figure 7 for daily traffic volumes and Figure 8 for p.m. peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Volume Impacts Figure 9 summarizes daily traffic impacts on roadways in the project site vicinity. Daily traffic volumes would increase by approximately 500 vehicles on SE 176"' Street/Carr Road S/S 43'd Street (approximate 1 percent increase) between SR 167 and SR 515. Daily traffic volumes on all other roadway locations identified in Figure 9 would increase by less than 100 to 200 vehicles per day. Future traffic volume calculations are provided in Appendix C. Intersection level of Service Impacts Figure 10 shows p.m. peak hour traffic volumes with and witliout the proposed Springbrook Ridge development. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B, and traffic volume calculations worksheets are provided in Appendix C. ~ T ransportadon Engineering North West, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA SW 7th St SW41stSt V> " "' ~ ~ ,... "' V> !i <( " C "' 0 S 200th St S 204th St Figure 6 SE 162nd St SE 164th St SE 182nd St SE 186th St "' !!! <( :z SE 192nd St SE 196th St Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Project Trip Distribution ~ Transportation Enstneering North West, LLC Transportadon Impact Study "' "' V> V> SE 168th St ~ ~ I SE 17 nd S "' V> " > <( .c c5 "' Q (Notto Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study February 10, 2009 Page 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA SW 7th St Transportation Impact Study // t/ f'sG<>~ . ~ ... ,# JTool : '405, ' ,., ...,.., [ ~i!P""' S 15th St "' ~ \1 ~""' ~ ,(s1P\ ;-, I ·~ ~ s ? ,fst St \--...._.....:l)i & <:) LJ "-.: r.... S / \ ~ SE 16,it~St 61 :,~3rd St 3: SE 162nd St "' ., < 200 .., C .., :::; "' ~ .. > '" 200 "' 200 I,~ Jt N 167 ~ ' ~ _:,S,::W_4!..'.1.:c,stc:S"-t l-~1---1:~ ,Z /. SE Carr R• S 1 80th St L A S 3·' t Projectv =~,;'.;~ Site .~ sE 176th st 500 SE I 82nd St "' ., > <( SE 186th St '" '5 0) ., 0 > <( \ '5 '() -- "' '" ~ "' i 1 .., C ,_ N SE 192nd 0 -- 167 -S198thSt I S 200th St SE 196th St S 204th St l Figure 7 St Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Daily Project Trip Assignment ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC '" '" "' "' SE 168th St 1 1 ~ SEt!nd~ ~ '" "' 1 '5 0 N ~ {Notto Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportadon Impact Study February 10, 2009 Page 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sprtngbrook Ridge Renton, WA SW 7th St '.11:.·~~,·L lu:a!!!!SR[l.SL!~S~/ifil.J2L-l====:i~4~0?'" '\ ~ S 15thSt/SPu=tDr 'f \ ' ~ S I SthSt. 8 ~ 1} i' ~7 -1• ksn.1511>.-,;St;___---j~_..§.S~ •-et°'".(~-;;;;•,-:~~;~ J ;)' ~ t ~ s st s n ~\ 10 !::$ ~~ St c=-r_......,_ _ _,ll'-,11 /?O' ~ I SRS!S/S2lstSt ~ 0: I SR SIS/ S Gwly Wy 2 t @" 1108th Ave SE/SE 172nd St lJ! t ~ I-- St SE 172nd St i-- Transportation Impact Study t.'I Benson Rd S/I081h Ave SE '1,,-I 08th W~y SEIN Pro]ect Site Or lJ! t ~ i ~ ~ t "a 29 J ~ ~ 2l 2 2 29 ~ ) + ' "'IT'l ~J, ., ~t ~"~'''""'"°'~ g. I ~ 2-A 1~:l:!St = . . 5 "' t S21s1S1 10Blh WavSE :i "i t J 6 2J t to r-c----,--, I - ,==.- ProiectV ¥ Site =""-~~:::~~ "41~...:s'.::•:.:s~1 s~'~"''.:"'°~"'.'.":::• ~s _! ~ . "-2 SW 41st St SE Carr R S180thSt ; ·~.rd t 1 , / j 11. .§j SR5!5/SE!76thS< ~~, 1--~S-4~3,>.,d~S</',----'-~ ~~i!11f=-'----,----v, 'fl I SR 167 NB Ramns =-Pl 22 7 7 L 6 ~ SE 182 r" BensooRdS t (' 11 8 21 t-- J "-to .,, ) + \._ 8 ..-12 ~ SE 18< ~ SE176/h&1 ~n----•----,c-"~--...,--~ 0 ~ !l> _g t (' ~ £ 00 S43rd.<:t t 6 13..+-~ 4 " . SE 192nd St - !l> -~i,'· ~-SR515/SE192ndSt 167 ,-·-·~-~----,., ~ S198thSt s 2 lli t \.. SE 196th St "--2 SE 192/ldSI t 515 t 4 S 204th St I Figure 8 Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment ~ Transportation Engineering NonhWest, LLC UJ V, ! ~ N -; (Not to Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study February I 0, 2009 Page 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA Transportation Impact Study SW 7th St ,I !/ r S G<•~~.>-:l ~ 3 izoor--,..,...,.. .--4-1-60-0~! -/3/,40o1L.!~~ ~ /41:aoo11 S 15th St \ ' "' :\1 ~ fs1s)\~ <:i'.:;, N gs ,fstStr' ~ fl,... U , l ,f:ird St \ l__ ----.1 SE 161 ~ St "-., SE 162nd St I . 20,600 1 1;;:--fTS"°Eil 6,,_4,.,._,th'iS"t-,_ __ _)._ __ ,,..+--, r20,aooJ ~.,, I , \ a '-!!~JJ .. ~ ~ ~ .-.-"-l(S ~ .----ill L}-'--'---i~~-+-....;S~E..!_16£!8~th11__:S~t__:~~t-...3J~ (20,JOO)i-.._ -4 -~ \ ~ 20,100 @~ ~ ~ -5 -5 \C~~~~~S ~1~7~n~dm,::::1ctzo~?m SE 172nd sl l1ii:l88JI ,-i i Pr~jectl/ "'-r,_-120:a88J I - 1"161 J · Site _lj' sE 116th st _,,S-"W_4,.,_1 "-st_:,:St'+-\\\--....Jrl ~ ,'.2 / _;,,~~J..,~~l~~~,/SE=C=ar~r R~d~-d,'., -",-,,::::jl 29,300 I -s 180th St ~ , s 3rd t ..,, I (29,500)1 1---1-~ u v;4~/-j 3 5,700 I SE 182nd St c:Slf n 56,000 (36,200) 1.,,u---=.:.=-=""--='.!.._-I . (56,500) ~ "' "' I -5 a) 0 SE 186th St "' "' ~ < -___ _.,.__ __ ~,-~ '-+--+-·-Jt----'S:.::E..!1_:.;92a!.n~d~St'---1---..---- I ..J :, 36,600 '::t"° -167 S 198th St Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC I (36,700) SE 196th St S 200th St 5~ S 204th St Figure 9 2010 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts I ~ Transportation Engineering NonthWest, LLC g (Not to Scale) Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Imp.Jct Study February 10, 2009 Page 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sprlngbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study SW 7th St I /_ J In, SRSIS/SGcadyWy / \Nj a "'--46 <46) ,., < G<•~L " ,,. ~-J /39) /629) /55) ~ ;1 ~-IT J9 627 55 .,_ 489 (489) "'r.: .. ;;-.J.~~~~~,---) t I,. rm 1m1 ~It, l"j...i( 1 SR 515 / S 15th St/ S Puget Dr fv"V'\ SGraoyWy 11s Dr SE • _J 405r _;I 'ff -._ _ _,,, "-249 <249) ,,.,,. (62! 62 '\ t I - (SB)(l,335)(362) .,_5/5) S 15th St.. (l/2)712_.. 382 328 280 58 1.327 362 _,., ,£ (387) (JJI} (282) I~ ) ,i. i,. ,, 20 1201 "' ~ ~ '"41 "o--,,. b=c---+---"''"""=.::°'{~.;·~ .,;I ;:;;;:;=:;:==;'.;:~~~;::; ,., S 15111 SI "-t 1f ~ 51 5 1:11 108th Ave SE / SE 1 72nd St ',--.;'..-~ rs1J s1 _;Jf I I -. u , ~ .,., 3 606 37 ~ S st !l>l ~ s (SJ I'-;;_ rs,s~ :;;(JJ lj~i> <:w! .._, (I) sE 16it~ st 11> (JJ J~ 55 ~ I '-~ Qt\ t \...-,r-10(10) @·t nln~~.sonRd /J08thAvc;,~llr ;t;: g \.\ SE 172nd SI u, ~ '~" SR515/521stSt ~ "'-o (OJ (2il) (1,261) (0) B; __,_ O /0) 241 1,255 0 - "'it /34)34...,, ,, t ,, -/2/ ~ ~ 33 /JJ) I ' ,. 0 '1$V <gi ! 1--0(0) (2) 2....... 43 333 8 i;, ':), (66) (JJS) (BJ I I I S:! y-s (SJ ~ (65) 36~ Jt f ~ 108/hWySE .'1\.---~ ].-;:-',--~ /-L~--' f=-=,,,.--+----"--j ) t I,_ ,,-0101 S 21st SI v· .c;1t* ,''~-'---o£cf---t--lNProJ9CIS:;t~_:A "''i t (' @. M (OJ a---.. ~ 0 352 5 /319) 319...A ~ t (' (D) 0-+-30 460 0 (30) (470) (0) (Bl) Bl~ ,------,~ ~ ~ Project/ 1 .-~ St = -(5) 0~ J (6J (J7SJ (SJ . ~.,,-=========r-~~1---f SE 176th St ~~ ;~ Site --'S~W::,__~4~1 s~t_,S:'.-t 1----!kllt\ ~ ~ ~ SE Carr Rd/ I ~.,.~-4}~:·H~-,",~,-,.,., '~,-,,-=-,--,-,d,-5:----, A . ~~rd!iS~t ~~~~,_j/ ~ /0~ J, 4 t·"'lij"--l__::SR::.5:.;1.:.ST,/S~E'-'1;_;76ccthc.;S.c.t---j 7/:I S 43rd St/ SR 167 NB Ramps .::'p L 142 (148) V'I S 180th St SE 182 i L 474 /4BiJ -' (~~J ru~i '!ff} +-616 (6161 ! s -+-1,196(1,208) ) t \.. r186(186) £lt----1 ~ • SE17&hS1 ~ SE 18c f-----t----~'~"'9"& (/Bl/,.,...,, ~ t (' ,1s911s9J I") t ( u.2ss1,.2ss_...., 20" 492 20s {1,093) 1,093 t <) -- (66) ~29(3/J 58 r 312110.,, \. &lnsonRdS t ('I m 299oi ~ {4J3) 2) ~ ' (2,204)2,191-+ g:: 320 I 404 (IOJ) IOJ~ ~/lOi)(i9B}(lOB) :!5(320) (/) /40B/I-J.,.=="7"'_:,:::.,----,-.Yt'.1il·---=..:.:=.=,=-'----,;---..,,---- '---,,---"-~"-Tr--~ r:a-f--:::c-::-c::-:'.;:;:-:'::::'.:;-;:--'1/-'l O = SE 192nd St ,- A 'e"\I SR515/SE 192nd5t ! <~ ~ "'-103 11051 SE 196th St - S 198th St 'i:J <gig> 'ii{19; .-54 (HJ ! J I I 515 -Jt. • 3i.. r14sr14sJ SE192nr1St r ' '"' ,7-" ~ t (' Legend 1283 ) 283 -+ 1j~J 1J~~) 1:~J rS_t.'---111----1 xx --. Volumes Without Prolect 11011101 ~ ' (xx)--. Volumes With Project g (Not to Scale) . Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 10 Springbrook Ridge 2010 P .M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts Renton, WA Transpc>rtation Impact Study ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Intersection levels of service impacts during the p.m. peak hour were evaluated at study intersections assuming full completion of the Springbrook Ridge development in 2010 and are summarized in Table 5. During the p.m. peak hour, Intersection #5 -SR 515 at SE 176"' Street would continue to operate at LOSE in the future with and without the proposed development in 2010. All other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOS D/C or better during the p.m. peak hour with and without the proposed development in 2010. As such, no significant adverse traffic impacts would occur as a result of the project. Table 5· 2010 PM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts . . . Without Without With With Control Project Project Project Project Signalized Intersections Tyne LOS Delay LOS Delay # 1 -SR 51 5 / S Grady Wy Signal D 39 D 39 #2 -SR 515 I S 15th St/ S Puget Dr Signal C 30 C 30 #3 -SR 515 / S 21 n St Signal C 26 C 26 #4 -SR 515 / Benson Rd S Signal A 10 B 11 #5 -SR 515 / SE 176"' St Signal E 73 E 75 #6 -SR 51 5 / SE 19 2"' St Signal D 41 D 41 #7 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43"' St Signal D 53 D 55 Without Without With With Control Project Project Project Project Unsignalized Intersections Tvpe LOS Delay LOS Delay #8 -108,. Ave SE/ SE 172"' St EB C 17 C 17 WB C 18 C 20 NB~ft A 8 A 8 SB ~ft A 8 A 8 #9 -Benson Rd S / 108th Ave SE / EB ---· B 14 108 .. Way SE/North Project Site Dr WB B 12 B 12 NB~ft ----A 8 SB ~ft A 8 A 8 Note: AnalySis based on Synchro 6, Traffic Szgnal Coortiina11on Seftwart and HCT2000_results ustng HCM 2000 control delays (seconds) and LOS. Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues Vehicular access would be provided via six site driveways with three full access driveways onto SE 172"d Street (including two driveways accessing the underground parking garage), one full access north project site driveway onto Benson Road S / 108"' Avenue SE at its intersection with 108'h Way SE, one recommended restricted right-turn in/out only south project site driveway onto Benson Road S, and one restricted right-turn in/out only driveway onto SR 515. The proposed south project site driveway onto Benson Road S should be restricted to right- in/right-out only to minimize potential safety issues at the this driveway location and queuing impacts to the SR 515 / Benson Road S intersection. ~ Transportadon Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sprtngbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Internal circulation remains adequate with proper two-way circulation within the site, providing adequate access for both private and emergency vehicles. Additionally, the applicant would be required to fully fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto SR 515, SE 172"d Street, 108"' Avenue SE, and Benson Road S. WSDOT Access Management Guidelines Access management standards identified in the Washington Administrative Code ~ AC) Chapter 468-52-040-2 -Highway Access Management -Access Control Classification System and Standard were evaluated in relation to the proposed action. SR 515 is a Class 3 Managed Access highway. The minimum distance to another public/private connection shall be 330 feet between centerlines per WSDOT Design Manual 1435.05(3) and 100' minimum corner clearance per WSDOT Design Manual 1435-1. The proposed restricted right-in/right-out only driveway onto SR 515 is located 330 feet from the centerline of Benson Road S, therefore, meeting minimum WSDOT access management standards. Driveway Operations A level of service analysis was conducted at all site driveway intersections onto SR 515, SE 172"d Street, 108"' Avenue SE, and Benson Road S. Entering and exiting movements at all project site driveway intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better with 95"' percentile queue lengths estimated at 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less during the p.m. peak hour in 2010 with the proposed development. Therefore, the site access intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service with minimal queuing impacts. Sight Distance The American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) was used to determine sight distance requirements at the project site driveways onto 108"' Avenue SE, Benson Road S, and SE 172"d Street. AASHTO requires 305 feet of stopping sight distance and 445 feet of entering sight distance for a 40 mph design speed (5 mph over 35 mph posted speed limit) onto 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S. Field-measured sight distances at the north project site driveway are approximately 250 feet to the north and greater than 455 feet to the soutJ;i of SR 515 (the roadway is a T-intersection and stops approximately 455 feet to the south). Field-measured sight distances at the south project site driveway are approximately 500 feet to the north. Therefore, sight distance at the south project site driveway onto Benson Road S would exceed AASHTO requirements. However, sight distance at the north project site driveway onto 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S would not meet AASHTO standards to the north. The project developer may need to obtain view easements from two neighbors located to the north of the project site on 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S to improve sight distance at the north project site driveway at its intersection with 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S / 108"' Way S. The first potential view easement would be obtained from the Family Circle Learning Center. By removing trees/vegetation on their property, sight distance would increase to a minimum of 420 feet. Sight distance should be re-verified after tree/vegetation removal to determine if the minimum 445 feet of sight distance standard is met. If required, additional sight distance could be accommodated by obtaining a view easement from the nearest residential neighbor north of SE 172"d Street and removing vegetation on their property. Another potential ~ T ransportatlon Engineering NonhWest, LLC February Io, 2009 Page 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study approach would be to determine if the trees/vegetation are located within City of Renton/King County right-of-way and have the appropriate agency maintenance department clear the trees/vegetation. After all necessary vegetation has been removed, there is the potential to obtain a sight distance variance by conducting a speed study to determine if a lower 85"' percentile speed can be used as the basis for sight distance requirements. AASHTO requires 250 feet of stopping sight distance and 335 feet of entering sight distance for a 30 mph design speed (5 mph over 25 mph posted speed limit) onto SE 172nd Street. Field- measured sight distances at all project site driveways onto SE 172nd Street are a minimum of 450 feet to the west and 400 feet to the east. Therefore, sight distance at all project site driveways onto SE 172nd Street would exceed AASHTO requirements. Based upon WSDOT design requirements for a 55 mph design speed (10 mph over posted speed limit of 45 mph) onto SR 515, a minimum of 770 feet is required for entering sight distance (WSDOT Design Manual, January 2005, Figure 910-17a Sight Distance at Intersections) and 560 feet for design stopping sight distance (WSDOT De.rignManual,June 1999, Figure 650-2 Design Stopping Sight Distance). Field-measured sight distances are estimated to be greater 950 feet to the south of the project site driveway onto SR 515. Therefore, entering sight distance at the proposed site access connection onto SR 515 exceeds WSDOT sight distance requirements. Parking Impacts The proposed development is estimated to construct up to 97 apartments, 17,800 square feet of general office space, and 8,900 square feet of shopping center space. Based upon City off-street parking standards (City of Renton Ordinance No. 5437, Subsection 4-4-080F.10.e: Residential Uses Outside of the Center Downtown Zone, Effective 12/18/2008), the proposed development would be required to provide a minimum of 186 and maximum of 295 off-street parking stalls (see Table 6). Table 6: Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements of Proposed Action Minimum Off-Street Parking Minimum Off-Street Parking Component Requirements 1 Size' Parking Sunnly Attached dwellings I per dwelling unit and a maximum of 97 DU 97Mlnlmum within all other zones 1. 7 5 per dwelling unit. 170 Maximum Offices, General 3 stalls per 1,000 square feet of net 17,800 sf 53 Minimum floor area and a maximum of 4.5 GFA SO Maximum parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. Shopping Center A minimum of 0.4 per 100 square 8,900 sf 36 Minimum feet of net floor area and a maximum GLA 45 Maximum of 0. 5 per 100 square feet of net floor area. Total Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirement 186 Minimum 295 Maximum 1 -Per City of Renton Ordinance No. 5437, Subsection 4---4--0SOF.10.e: ReS1dentlal Uses Outside of the Center Downtown Zone, Effectwe 12/18/2008. 2 -DU is Dwelling Unit, GF A is square feet of Gross Floor Area, and GLA is square feet of Gross Lea.sable Area. ~ Transportadon Engineering NorthWest, LLC February 10, 2009 Page 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study As shown in Table 7, parking generation rates compiled by the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 3"' Edition, were used to estimate parking supply and demand of the proposed Mid-Rise Apartments (ITE land use code 223), General Office (ITE land use code 710), and Shopping Center (ITE land use code 820). As shown below, the parking generation is estimated at 191 parking stalls. Therefore, the estimated peak ITE parking generation rate is approximately 25 percent less than what is required for the City of Renton Municipal Code off-street parking requirements, and no additional off-street parking would be required. Table 7: Parking Generation ITE Land Land Use Use Code Size' Parking Rate 2 Mid-Rlse Apartment 223 97 DU 1 .2 stalls per dwelling unit General Office 710 17,800 GFA 2.84 stalls per 1,000 square feet of GFA Shopping Center 820 8,900 GLA 2.65 stalls per 1,000 square feet of G LA Total Parking Generation 1 -ODU 1s Occupied Dwelling Urut, GFA ts gross floor area, and GLA Cl gross leasable area. 2 Based upon the ITE Parking Generation MmzHa/, 3n:1 Edition. Public Transportation Impacts Parking Generatlon 2 116 51 24 191 The nearest transit stop is located within 1,000 feet of the project site to the south at the intersection of SR 515 and SE 176th Street serving King County-Metro transit routes 155, 161, and 169 with service to downtown Seattle, Kent, Southcenter, and Tukwila. Transit users would be able to find accessible routes for their transit needs via transit routes serving the SR 515 and SE 176th Street intersection. No additional transit improvements are anticipated as part of this project. Nonmotorized Transportation Impacts The proposed development would construct/ re-construct curbs, gutters and sidewalks on all property frontages of SR 515, 108th Avenue SE, Benson Road S, and SE 172nd Street. Raised sidewalks are also located on SR 515 and SE 176th Street for access to transit routes at this intersection. No additional non-motorized transportation improvements are expected as part of the project. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Springbrook Ridge Renton WA IPRO]IECT MHTHGATION MIEASIUIRIES Transportation Impact Study A review of impacts to roadways, intersection levels of service, site access, safety, and circulation issues, parking, public transportation services, and nonmotorized transportation facilities, was conducted in association with the proposed development. The following paragraphs outline recommended mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate project impacts as a result of the proposed Springbrook Ridge development. >" The proposed south project site driveway onto Benson Road S should be restricted to right-in/ right-out to minimize potential safety issues at this new driveway location and queuing impacts to the SR 515 / Benson Road S intersection. >" The applicant would be required to fully fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto SR 515, SE 172nd Street, and 108"' Avenue SE, and Benson Road S. >" The project developer may need to obtain view easements from two neighbors located to the north of the project site on 108'h Avenue SE / Benson Road S to improve sight distance at the north project site driveway at its intersection with 108"' Avenue SE / Benson Road S / 108"' Way S. The first potential view easement would be obtained from the Family Circle Learning Center. By removing trees/vegetation on their property, sight distance would increase to a minimum of 420 feet. Sight distance should be re-verified after tree/vegetation removal to determine if the minimum 445 feet of sight distance standard is met. If required, additional sight distance could be accommodated by obtaining a view easement from the nearest residential neighbor north of SE 172"d Street and removing vegetation on their property. Another potential approach would be to determine if the trees/vegetation are located within City of Renton/King County right-of-way and have the appropriate agency maintenance department clear the trees/vegetation. After all necessary vegetation has been removed, there is the potential to obtain a sight distance variance by conducting a speed study to determine if a lower 85"' percentile speed can be used as the basis for sight distance requirements. >" The proposed development would be required to provide a minimum of 186 and maximum of 29 5 off-street parking stalls. · >" The applicant will be subject to City of Renton's Mitigation Payment System, which will be reasonably related to the development's proportionate share of the cost of transportation improvement projects in the area. This fee is established at $75 per daily vehicle trip, totaling $81,750 per a net total of 1,090 daily project trips. A development may qualify for reduction of the $75 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits for development incentives, construction of needed transportation improvements (arterial, HOV, transit), through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management programs. ~ Transportation Engineering NonhWest, LLC February I 0, 2009 Page 24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix A Traffic Counts ~ T ransportadon Engineering NonhWest, LLC I I I .1 •• I I I I I I I I I I I Peak Hour Summary ·- i .. -'; -----.----- Maril Skaggs (206) 251-0300 SGradvWav EJ ~· 113511 ~ ~ Approach PHF HV% EB 0.91 2.0% WB 0.98 3.0% NB 0.89 1.5% SB 0.92 1.3% Intersection 0.95 2.0% SR 515 (Talbot) & S Grady Way 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Thursday, November 06, 2008 "" 0 :9 ~ It) B I 402 I .. It) ti: "' I I s•• I I 37 52 ~ .e, ~ N .... £ s ~ ... 1J 13solJ01!2s3! "" 115131 19241 0 :9 ~ It) .. It) ti: "' Volume 1,351 807 924 677 3,759 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ·~ ~ 461 I •01 I ~ 303 19861 SGradyWay I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Vehicle Summary SR 515 (Talbot) & S Grady Way Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM lnteNal Northbound .... SR 515 fTaJDOt Time L T R 4:00PM 85 85 74 4:15 PM 95 63 61 4:30PM 101 " 63 4:45 PM 79 59 65 5:00PM 69 42 65 5:15PM 76 53 47 5:30 PM 70 71 57 5:45 PM 61 51 46 Total Survey 638 518 '78 Peak Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM By Northbound SR 515 fTalbotl Approach lo I Out I Total ! Volume 824 1 513 2 437 %HV 1.5% PHF 0.89 By Northbound SR 515 <Talbot ""'""'"' L I T R Volume 390 301 283 PHF 0.89 I 0.79 0.89 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound St•• SR 515 (Talbot Tlmo L T R 4:00PM 360 301 263 4:15PM 344 258 254 4:30 PM 327 248 240 4:45 PM 296 224 234 5:00PM 278 217 215 HV 4 2 3 5 • 1 3 0 22 HV 14 T°"" '" 0.69 HV 14 14 13 13 8 Southbound SR 515 fTalbot L T R 11 161 11 14 127 12 10 162 7 17 139 7 12 151 9 16 141 7 17 167 1 15 127 0 112 1,174 54 Southbound SR 515 (Talbot) In I Out l Total I 677 402 110791 1.3'!1, 0.92 Southbound SR 515Cfal""' L I T R 52 569 37 0.76 I 0.91 0.77 Southbound SR 515 rral L T R 52 "' 37 53 578 35 55 592 30 82 597 " 60 569 17 HV 4 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 12 HV ' Total 6u 0.92 HV ' 5 8 4 3 ~~ lo Oet 677 402 ~ ci le ~ 37 566 52 C .J ,&. '-i> HV 3.0% PHF 0.98 t_., Out 858 In 1,351 <I}-461 Eastbound SGm """' L T R HV 15 136 139 7 12 165 144 • 16 163 169 5 15 165 171 11 14 141 125 7 7 106 135 2 10 134 164 5 11 172 175 6 100 1,224 1,221 47 Eastbound S GradvWav lo IOutlTotall HV 1,351 I 858 I 2,209 I 27 2.0% 0.91 Eastbound SGra..tuw..u L I T I R !Total 58 I 671 I 622 11,351 0.91 I 0.91 I 0.91 10.91 Eastbound SG- .. _ L T R HV 59 671 622 27 57 874 608 27 52 595 599 25 46 566 595 25 42 553 599 20 +303 HV 2.0% PHF 0.81 +t t ,. 360 301 263 Out In ~~ 1,513 924 D.. Peak Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Westbound S Gradvwav ll"llerVal L T R HV Totm 79 107 12 6 917 69 103 11 2 915 73 125 7 4 990 63 126 13 12 937 66 103 6 5 823 52 117 15 11 774 65 85 7 5 846 46 108 7 4 821 554 874 78 49 7,025 Westbound S GradvWav Total tn I Out I Total I HV 807 I 986 I 1,7931 24 3,759 3.0% 2.0% 0.98 0.95 Wa1tbound SGn>a,,w., Tobi L I T I R iTOtal 303 I 461 I 43 1807 3,750 0.66 I 0.81 I 0.83 10.98 0.95 Wostbound SGra tvwav Interval L T R HV Total 303 481 43 24 3,759 310 457 37 23 3665 274 471 41 32 3,524 266 431 41 33 3392 251 413 35 25 3,2"0 807 In "' Cul :I I I I I .I I I I. I I I I I Peak Hour Summary (~!I>) S 15th St Mark Skaggs (206) 251-0300 G @· G ~ ~ "' .. "' a:: "' I SR 515 & S Puget Dr 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Thursday, November 06, 2008 116431 18451 55 112471341 1 It ,!!, ~ N W*E s ~ ',I 11 I 3 15621 35 112691 B Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.78 3.6% 56 WB 0.86 1.9% 259 NB 0.94 1.7% 600 SB 0.94 1.0% 1,643 Intersection 0.94 1.3% 2,558 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ·~ ~ 5 B It 19 8 S Puget Dr I "' .. "' a:: "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Vehicle Summary I~ -~~ MalkSkagg5 (206) 251-0300 SR 515 & S Puget Dr Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15~Mlnute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound .... SR515 nm, L T R 4:00 PM 0 150 7 4:15PM 1 120 7 4:30PM 2 151 7 4:45 PM 0 141 14 5:00 PM 1 147 11 5:15PM 1 136 ' 5:30 PM 0 140 15 5:45PM 0 121 6 Total Surve~ 5 1,106 76 Peak Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM By Northbound SR 515 Approach '" I Out I Total I Volume eoo 11259118691 %HV 1.7% PHF 0.94 By Northbound Movement SR515 L I T R HV 4 2 1 3 6 'O 1 1 18 HV 10 T~• L 89 83 91 78 61 64 70 71 627 '" 1,643 L Southbound SR 515 T R "' 12 332 16 333 15 263 12 306 16 316 12 267 14 223 10 2,379 107 Southbound SR 515 I Out I Total I 645 2468 1.0% 0.94 Southbound SR515 ' T R Volume 3 I 582 I 35 i6CXl 341 I 1247 55 PHF 036 0.93 0.63 Rolllng Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound """ SR515 nm, L T R 4:00PM 3 562 35 ,USPM 4 559 39 4:30PM 4 575 41 4:45PM 2 564 " 5:00PM 2 544 41 0.94 0.94 I 0.94 I 0.86 Southbound SR515 HV L T R 10 341 1247 55 12 313 1254 59 10 314 1,238 55 10 293 1,192 54 6 286 1132 52 HV 4 6 4 3 6 6 6 1 40 HV 17 Total 1,643 0.94 HV 17 21 23 25 23 ~1 '" ''"' 1,643 845 ,..; d >• 55 1,247 341 ,, ~ "' I.., " HV 1.9% PHF 0.86 .. J rn t. 235 Out 63 259 In '" 56 5-i) 381 Out '"). 41 t r> ~ ~ 3 562 35 ,..; ci O<rt '" ~~ 1,269 600 " Peak Hour Summary 4:00PM to 5:00PM Eastbound Westbound S 15th St s---u:)I· Interval L T R HV L T R HV Total 15 0 0 0 5 2 68 2 847 15 2 1 0 3 1 48 1 629 6 0 0 0 6 2 66 1 679 12 3 2 2 5 0 53 1 603 13 2 1 0 2 1 39 0 600 6 0 1 0 4 0 55 0 626 11 1 1 0 5 2 61 1 627 9 1 4 0 3 2 49 0 "' 69 ' 10 2 33 10 459 6 4,910 Eutbound Westbound 515th $1 SP,.,,etDr Total '" IOutlTotaJIHV '" I Out I Total I HV 56 63 I 119 I 2 259 361 640 5 2,558 3.6% 1.9% 1.3% 0.78 066 0.94 Eastbound W.•tbound S 15th St S ~ -et Or Total L T R Total L I T R -!Total 48 5 3 ,~ 19 ' 5 235 259 2,558 0.60 0.42 0.38 0.78 0.79 I 0.83 ·1 0.88 I0.86 0.94 Eastbound Westbound S 15th St SP,, et Dr Interval L T R HV L T R HV Total 48 5 3 2 19 5 235 5 2,558 46 7 4 2 16 4 206 3 2 511 39 5 4 2 17 3 213 2 2 506 44 6 5 2 16 3 228 2 2456 41 4 7 0 14 5 224 1 2352 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) 251-0300 .... .. .... 3i SR 515 & Benson Rd S 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Thursday, November 06, 2008 I 10s5I 8 110301 55 I Ii!, ll N "'*" s .;. 1l 140112121 . 113771 EJ Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.00 0.0% 0 WB 0.90 1.3% 374 NB 0.95 1.2% 673 SB 0.91 0.3% 1,085 Intersection 0.93 0.8% 2,132 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ~G B ~B B BensonRdS .... ... .... II: "' I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Vehicle Summary Mani:. Skaggs (206) 251-0300 SR 515 & Benson Rd S Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15·Mlnute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM lntltrval Northbound Start SR 515 Time T R HV 4:00PM 100 70 4:15PM (03 65 4:30PM 103 75 4:45PM !05 70 5:00 PM 90 62 5:15 PM 109 67 5:30 PM 99 70 5:45 PM 96 58 Total Surve 605 537 Peak Hour Summary 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM By Northbound SR515 4 3 1 1 3 0 0 2 14 Southbound SR 516 L T to 269 11 242 10 268 13 "' 21 264 19 194 15 256 11 204 110 1,953 Southbound SR515 HV 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 1 ' ,_.,ch '" I Out I Total I HV In I Out I Total I HV Volume 673 1,3n 2,050 I ' %HV 1.2% PHF 0.95 By Northbound SR 515 Movoment I T I R ITOlal Volume 401 272 6,3 PHF I 0.95 I 0.91 10.95 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Start SR 515 Tl-T R HV 4:00 PM 411 260 9 4:15 PM 401 272 6 4:30 PM 407 274 5 4:45 PM 403 269 4 5:00 PM 394 257 5 1,085 I 428 1513 3 0.3% 0.91 Southbound SR515 L I T I ITOtal 55 1,030 I 11,085 0.65 l 0.89 I 10.91 Southbound SR515 L T HV 44 1 035 3 55 1030 3 63 9B2 2 68 950 4 66 916 5 '" 0 ~stbound Benson Rd S Eastbound Benson RdS Out 0 '" 0 !OutlTotall 0 0 0.0% 0.00 Eastbound Benson Rd$ I I !Total I I ID I I l0.00 Eastbound Benson RdS it;;;; '" 0,1 1,085 '28 c:i ci >• 1,030 55 ~ Ii ~ i ~ HV 1.3% HV 0.0% PHF 0.00 ..J -I> "\ [±J .... t,... 401 272 Out '" 1,377 673 PHF 0.90 t.21 <I-+ 347 Peak Hour Summary 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Westbound Benson Rd S Interval L R HV Total " ' 0 537 66 3 0 512 89 ' 1 573 72 10 3 506 98 ' 1 541 79 5 1 473 65 4 0 509 85 7 3 461 658 49 ' 4,112 Westbound Benson Rd S Tot,! '" I Out I Total I HV 374 327 70, 5 2132 1.3% 0.8% 0.90 0.93 Westbound Benson Rd S Total L I I R !Total 347 I I 27 1374 2,132 0.89 I I 0.88 0.90 O.B3 Westbound Benson Rd S Interval L R HV Total 331 27 4 2128 347 27 5 2 "' 338 29 ' 2 093 314 25 5 2,029 327 22 5 1964 374 In 327 Out I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I u TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:30 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45PM ( "' ~ "I I a: <I) SE 176th Street I 789 I --<[ --,__ ... -N 142 --I I 1,358 1122 94 "' INTERSECTION ~ PEAK HOUR VOLUME <I) IN 4,524 OUT 4,524 COUNTED BY: ~J~H/~R_H ___ _ REDUCED BY: ~C~N ____ _ DATE: Tue. 2/20/07 I 2,209 I I I 11,4871 ~ 50 110441 393 ' J ,...... ' \ / ----~ _..... "--.. I \ l " 1861 450 I 190 11,3081 ~ I 2,134 I SR-615 @SE 176th Street Renton, WA TO 130 553 170 - 5:45 PM SE 176th Street I 853 I - "' "' "' N §] -- HV PHF SB 1% 0.95 NB 2% 0.87 WB 3% 0.94 EB 1% 0.93 INTRS. 2% 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2120/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:30 • 6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING lfilj TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET .=SccR,_,-5'-'1"'5-"@"--"SE=----'-17,._,6,,th=St,,ra,,,e,,t _________ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~""=·~2~12=0/~07~ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R~e"nt~o~nLW=A ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~4=:3~0--=6:~00~P~M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR-515 SR-515 SE 176th Street SE 176th Street AT HV Left Thru Riqht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 3 05:00 PM 6 05:15 PM 6 05:30 PM 2 05:45 PM 3 06:00 PM 1 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 17 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV a Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor · REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 263 73 288 88 242 100 276 132 238 58 226 393 1044 1487 1% 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 34 105 30 6 3 39 105 40 13 2 40 103 40 15 6 48 108 66 16 2 59 134 44 15 5 43 110 64 50 13 186 450 190 826 2% 0.87 4:30 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 139 15 4 30 255 11 4 35 137 32 4 30 286 20 5 40 128 30 5 31 270 21 12 49 146 26 2 42 266 26 5 46 140 42 5 39 300 27 4 50 105 38 1 26 231 26 26 170 553 130 16 142 1122 94 853 1358 3% 1% 0.94 0.93 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: JH/RH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 1091 1046 1170 1217 992 INTERSECTION 4524 2% 0.93 2/2012007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peak Hour Summary !~-·) ---.:'.~----=---~-,~ Mani Ska1XJS {206) 251-0300 SE 192ndSt EJ B ~· ~ ~ ., .. ., 0:: c,, I SR 515 & SE 192nd St 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Thursday, November 06, 2008 !10861 EJ 51 i 82s i 210 I tt ,& ~ N W*E s r;t ~ 11 I 28 i s28 i 81 E~ 8 Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.84 0.5% 371 we 0.86 1.8% 282 NB 0.93 1.4% 637 SB 0.90 0.6% 1,086 Intersection 0.93 1.0% 2,376 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM -~ 4-48 B tt 137 B SE 192ndSt I ., .. ., 0:: c,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Vehicle Summary ---------. ~:» • • • _.,->' Maril Skaggs (206) 251-0300 SR 515 & SE 192nd St Thursday,Noven,ber06,2008 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15·Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound .... SR515 llma L T R HV 4:00PM 6 153 12 4:15 PM ' 132 24 4:30PM 7 123 " 4:45PM 9 120 19 5:00 PM 10 132 32 5:15PM 4 137 16 5:30PM 5 129 24 5:45 PM 8 113 22 Total Survei 55 1,039 175 Peak Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM " Northbound SR515 Approach tnlOut/Tolall Volume 637 I 1 040 I 1,677 I %HV 1.4% PHF 0.93 6y Northbound SR515 4 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 " HV 9 Movement L I T I R IT"" L 44 61 47 56 .. 64 43 3S 416 to 1 0661 L I Southbound SR 515 T R HV 244 13 1 197 13 1 215 " 3 169 11 2 205 17 1 170 13 7 209 14 2 177 13 3 1,586 106 20 Southbound SR 515 Q,t Total HV 000 117461 7 0.6% 0.90 Southbound SR 515 T I R IT<rtai Volume 2815281 " 1837 210 I 825 I 51 11.086 PHF 0.78 I 0.86 I 0.78 10.93 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound .... SR 515 llma L T R 4:00PM 26 526 61 4:15PM 32 507 101 4:30PM 30 512 93 4:45PM 28 516 91 5:00PM 27 511 94 HV 9 6 7 7 7 0.86 I 0.65 I 0.91 10.90 Southbound SR515 L T R HV 210 825 51 7 232 "' 55 7 235 759 55 13 231 753 55 12 208 761 57 13 L 9 12 7 7 • 10 6 9 66 lo Eastbound SE 192nd St T R 56 20 53 22 65 17 64 19 51 27 66 17 74 21 44 17 513 180 Eastbound SE 192nd St Out 127 1n 371 HV 0.5% PHF 0.84 lo 1,086 0,1 660 51 825 210 41 t ~ 28 528 81 Out In 1,040 &37 HV 1.8% PHF 0.86 'l.,1 4-48 r"' 282 In 549 Out Peak Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Westbound SE 192nd St Interval HV L T R HV Total 1 " 14 27 2 639 1 27 13 25 1 565 0 37 13 20 2 591 0 32 8 25 0 561 0 43 13 25 4 825 1 43 6 17 0 585 0 25 11 20 1 563 0 29 10 22 2 499 3 277 90 161 12 4,868 Westbound SE 192nd st Total Out Total • HV lo Out Total HV 371 1 127 I 498 I 2 282 I 549 I 831 I 5 2,376 0.5% 1.8% 1.0% 0.64 0.86 0.93 Eastbound westbound SE 192nd St SE 192nd St To1'l L I T R ]Total L I T I R To"' 35 I 258 I 78 1371 137 I 48 I 97 1282 2,376 0.73 o.n 0.69 0.64 0.84 I 0.86 I 0.90 10.86 0.93 Eastbound westbound SE 192nd St SE 192nd St Interval L T R HV L T R HV Tout 35 256 76 2 137 46 97 5 2 376 30 253 65 1 139 47 " 7 2362 26 266 80 1 155 42 67 6 2 362 29 295 64 1 143 40 67 5 2 354 31 255 62 1 140 42 64 7 2292 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I M TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM TO 5:45PM a. E .. "' ,: 0 a, z ,_ CD ~ Cl'. "' SE 43rd Street I 1,325 I -~ CD N CD "' 328 --~ 1973 ' 0 a. E .. "' = INTERSECTION 0 a, PEAK HOUR VOLUME z ,_ CD IN 4,379 ~ er. "' OUT 4,379 I 718 I I I 0 ~ o I o I o , v . '\ / --......._ ~ ~ ,,.. ,...____ I .\ J. ' ' 2931 1 I 363 0 E] I 657 I ' 389 1032 0 SE 43rd Street ~ -~ ,_ "' ,_ "' ~ '-- HV PHF SB #NIA #N/A NB 3% 0.81 WB 2% 0.92 EB 2% 0.93 INTRS. 2% 0.94 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor SR-167 NB Ramps @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA COUNTED BY: .ocJc..:H/"-K'-'H'---- REDUCED BY: --=C~N'----- DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING M TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET _,,S"R-'-1"'67'-"N=B-'-R'-"a"m"p"s_,,@~S:cE=--c43~r_,,d-"S"'tr"ee~t~----DATE OF COUNT: -'-T"hu~.-"2'-'/1"'5'-"/0~7 ___ COUNTED BY: ~R"en~t"o~n~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: -'-4"':0~0--6~:0~0~P-'-M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR-167 NB On-Ramp SR-167 NB Off-Ramp SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street AT HV Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Riqht HV Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Riaht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 0 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 0 05:30 PM 0 05:45 PM 0 06:00 PM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 0 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #NIA #N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 72 0 73 20 0 246 99 3 63 439 0 0 9 68 0 70 6 0 215 85 9 97 415 0 0 10 84 0 77 7 0 277 107 3 63 404 0 0 6 99 0 103 7 0 242 82 10 76 512 0 0 2 68 1 76 7 0 260 88 9 92 471 0 0 5 80 0 97 6 0 248 115 10 88 532 0 0 5 46 0 87 9 0 282 104 10 72 458 0 0 5 61 0 78 12 0 264 95 10 61 432 0 0 18 293 1 363 29 0 1032 389 39 328 1973 0 657 1421 2301 3% 2% 2% 0.81 0.92 0.93 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: .__4cc.:4'-'5-'P-'M"--'T-'0-"'5:-'45.cc..PM=-....., pATE OF REDUCTION: JH/KH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 992 950 1012 1114 1056 1160 1049 991 INTERSECTION 4379 2% 0.94 2/16/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Peak Hour Summary ~~) Merk.Skaggs {206) 251--0300 SE 172ndSt G ~-G ~ ~ Approach PHF HV'lo EB 0.65 0.0% WB 0.63 0.0% NB 0.93 0.3% SB 0.90 1.1% Intersection 0.93 0.6% (I) ,:, II: t: 0 ~ QI QI Benson Rd S & SE 172nd St I 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Thursday, November 06, 2008 B B 16 i aa• I 9 I ft ,a. ~ N w.£ s l;t ... ~ I 41 I ao• I B I B j 3531 Volume 68 15 353 359 795 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM "ffi ~ 1 G ~ 9 G SE 172ndSt (I) ,:, II: t: 0 .. t: QI QI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Vehicle Summary Mal\\ Skaggs (206} 251·0300 Benson Rd S & SE 172nd St Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound St.a Bel'ISOn Rd S Time L T R HV 4:00 PM 7 59 1 4:15PM 13 91 2 4:30 PM 14 •• 0 4:45PM 9 91 5 5:00 PM 10 63 1 5:15PM 13 81 1 5:30PM 10 79 1 5:45PM 5 81 1 Total SuNe) 80 58' 12 Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM By Northbound Benson RdS Approach lo I Out I Total I Volume 353 I sn11so1 %HV 0.3% PHF 0.93 By Northbound Benson RdS Movement T R L I 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 HV 1 Total Southbound Benson RdS L T R 1 87 2 0 00 7 2 87 • 3 96 1 1 72 • 0 90 5 5 76 • 1 84 5 13 692 38 Southbc11md Benson RdS In I Out I Total 359 I 341 I 700 I 1.1% 0.90 Southbound Benson Rd S L T R HV 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 • HV 4 Total Volume 41 I 304 I 8 1353 8 I 334 I 16 13~9 PHF 0.78 0.94 0.40 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Sta< Benson RdS Tlmo L T R 4:00 PM 42 290 8 4:15PM 45 29< 8 4:30PM 45 294 7 4:45PM 41 304 • 5:00PM 38 304 4 0.93 0.45 0.87 0.67 0.00 Southbound Benson Rd S HV L T R HV 2 8 370 18 3 2 6 345 18 3 1 • 345 18 4 1 9 334 18 4 0 7 322 20 3 !~ '" 0"1 359 341 r -o >• 16 334 9 ,, ~ ,!,. I+ " HV 0.0% PHF 0.63 32...f [±] 't.s Out 58 15 In 2~ +.1 In 68 19 Out .. ""l, . . .("' +.a t ~ ~ s 41 304 9 d d 0'4 '" >• '' m 353 " Peak Hour Summary 4:45PM to 5:45PM Eastbound Westbound SE 172ndSt SE 172nd St lntarval L T R HV L T R HV Total 3 1 13 0 0 0 1 0 195 • 0 9 1 1 0 0 0 207 9 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 193 3 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 201 7 1 5 0 3 0 1 0 169 6 1 10 0 4 1 1 0 213 16 0 10 0 1 0 3 0 207 3 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 191 so ., 73 1 10 1 7 0 1,571 Eastbound Westbound SE 172nd St SE 172nd St Total '" IQutlTotall HV '" I CM Tatel 1 HV 69 I 58 I 126 I 0 15 I 19 I 3-4 I 0 795 O."' 0.0% 0.8% 065 0.63 0.93 Eastbound Wn:tbound SE 172nd St SE 172nd St Total L T ' R !Total L T I R 1Total 32 I 2134168 • I 1 I 5 !15 795 0.50 0.50 I 0.85 !0.65 0.56 0.25 0.42 0.63 0.93 Eastbound Westbound SE 172nd St SE 172nd St Interval L T R HV L T R HV Total 18 1 31 1 2 0 2 0 792 22 1 29 1 ' 0 2 0 775 24 2 30 0 8 1 3 0 761 32 2 .. 0 9 1 5 0 795 32 2 36 0 8 1 5 0 778 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix B Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections ~ T ransportatlon Engineering North West, LLC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Grady Wy & SR 515 -1/23/2009 t MoV:ement :2;·~·;.'. ,,~.'.!::" ~.· ,E.B~EB'i:"'."\'.;r-1:sR~WBl!["wat~V))B~NBCf'i'NBT"'i"'.tNB~~fjT,~9R ~a~e C?nfig,':'r~tions .. · _ ..... '\'t_ .. ti'" .J1,, ...... "'i't ..... ti. ___ --·-· _>,"'i, __ tf.,, .......... ,,,. . "i .. ttf., --·-- ldeal'flow(vphpl)· , '' : ·•,1900, ,,1900 ,i1900 ..... 1900 ,, '.1900]''':1900 <'1900:, .. , 1900•, ·. 1900, ,, t900 .,, 1900.'' 19.00 Total Losttime (s) . . 3.0 , 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 ~, 3.0 " 3.o·-"3:0--------3.0 __ . :3'.o···----· E'a/f!l·l:ltii'"Fact§i-,,. , ;;: 1,90 .::::.o,95'.,: foo:_: :0.9t;;:,O,!!§:\:'.\i:::,'o.97, :.·o:951_'~,;,too.· '(l,.9,t' •. :::::~".':J Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 Eltf>r6tected,r7 ".":''.) ;'.".<,,·:o~95,'.C~,1·pQ;,,{ yoo,.z·•,0,95 .·. ·~1.00 ,: i, ,: .;,: \ ':Mis' ,z.1.00, >.<:T< '>.:0.~5 ,, ,•,1,oo,0, .. , ,;: Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 3400 3460 3433 3291 1787 5090 Fltfermittea: ,;; . ": .. <~ o:9s· ,1.00 , -,t.oo , · o.s5. :, 1.00., _ : ... :;; 025"; ·1.00:. ::· ,,··o.9L'.,1.oo .. ''. ... 1 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 3400 3460 3433 3291 1787 5090 Volufne (vpli) :·~?/",; · ./, ,§8 ,:)~11; :, 622, ::;:,:303: i;;46t ' '.43, '.,::360 <' _30_1, '.;')63\/: 52,, .. · ·i?,88' .. ; '37, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adi!Flow(vphy"::,<' ····"•64, ,737 'i684 .. i''.30s".'::.470 {,44,,404,:,,338::', .. :295,.p 57!, 639. '40 RTOR R~duction.(vph) "o -· ""·o--198 -·-o-" 6 . o" '"·o···--12s" ... 0 ..... 0 ·---6 ,. --0 Lane'.Groupflow_(vph) __ : ;s~l,', .. 7,37. ,,~86. \;3C>9 , '5()8 ... di :,;404,, 5~,.· ,"'\p,;·;_,57 ,';.673.2:~ ..... o Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% (t\frn,,ype .,;·::,~~:·:;:· , .. :~0 ··:.:;:; '·, .. ~,.:, 'Pfot_ ~_,;7:· ~::,,:::~ .. Per,m_i" ~~ -Pr,Qt~ Y· !'".:·_):"," ;~-~-:>: ··., .,''' '" ··:,· · Pi'6t1 _'" ·., .;, ·~:7 ";·~ ··'.. '';:~:·'. ~ ,.:J>~Pt ~.~:. ,.,1 ·~ :;/"< ~ .. --·.l .. a··_;-~ Protected Phases 2 6 5 1 3 8 7 4 Per'mltted _f>haSe)': ·· ... ·: ... ' ,-.. ::~,.:,;. ·w:,'-, --~-iJ .·( ·:·-•. ~., ... ·'· _.' .• _.5;· ,,: .. : '., /, ':,:~'..·') . .._T:::·•! ':·· .: ' -~·':",, 4/ ·,::\.: .. ; _''\'· ... ~.,' , .. ."<-' :_.·-:·_ .~ ~·~· ,;_ .. "':!.: ;_ -."" ,, .. _.; ,, ,,j,;·: ... _:f···,:::. ;;~"-.' ' ·'-:; Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 44.6 44.6 15.8 49.8 17.7 34.6 8.0 22.9 Efiective'Green;]cs> 7:; ·,, 1·r:a:· · <1s:tr:'::as's' ';, '1 t .s':.J51:.aC'C'. ., .. ~ ,;: 1 !ft: : 35:£i:::·~·:::· ,-::;·p;,r o·i .. -2,f 9. · :'T ~ Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.38 0.38 . 0.15" 0.43 ' 0.16 ~ 0.30 ~"o.08"' 0.21 ' ., . Clearance,'fime (s) ',,,,.:)~'.15,0:,. ,:,4',0~:;·:;.Jo•,,,: p.0:,. __ 5,0 >,:,,,),:.:.,,.· 5:0.,',',;':4:o;•,:;:;~~··."} •4:0··.· ,'1 5.00 ·· ... · • J Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest ,,·,~· -~ ~ ·~ . .,._ --~ -• ·r ' • ._ .. ' ,L ,. -~ ·~ •. ,-,~~•· .,,. .. 1 ... _ •• - , ,_. ·-. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: S 15th St & SR 515 -1/23/2009 <l- Moyem~ril~,.~~~·-~ ,'/':":.EBIE':•,'EB'F· .,;EBR• ·~·WBU.,, WBj~~N:Bbr'\NBNliii;f~C.f: Sl3T;"'.·SBR Lane C?nfigurations .,. , . __ l>j , • . f.., .... ···,-··· _ ·. . .4' .. · Pl' ... _"I ... +t+. . ......... 'l .... <tl>~ .. .. Ideal Flow. (vphpJL,· ... .,.1900 ., .. '.J 9op:·,;::1,900,s;J900.\ .. :190,q;:· 1900 .. :·:-19_oo..,._: 1900;:., 1000 .. 190QL feoo 1,19~0 Grade(%) 0% -5% 7% -7% frOtat ~Ost. tim£ (s): '--~r..~~, ···,~4 :o LZ. A. O_~ ~ ;.J;(,.'._'.; .',:;.~:,'··-.~;·;;;:··:_:~'.~< 4-0; 'f '7~~t 0<;1·:G" 4~~0.1 .... ,; .. , ·-4·; o.'.'.'·' ,. ..... ::~,;:,:;· .-,o-,.: ·:.:4.0_,/ .j'.J{Q. ~· ·.;.;~_;} Lane Util. Factor . 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 F.rt ;~~r,~·\:~,. :~_ ~ ''-') > ·,:,· :'".·It: __ ' ::,~:: .. p ' •. 1 ·,. Oo '\·:, ... ~-b)J4~--•,_'. -:~,,,:; ' ~~-\~ ·. ·•! ~. ', ,;,;~~ ,;Jt'. oo_·,~:·:.-.. 0: 8§ ·_:. ,~> f 00 :· ;/~'. 0. 9_9 ,. _ .. , -~,,i,c. ·1>. :/ "',· 1': 00: ' _i· . 0 --~9 :-~~ -~;. !~~.;n Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 satci"l=Jow(i>ro1>T",:,:-::~.:11f6 :::111't~:-·, :-;;:?:~,.;:~;1a31,·:c·28s!ir) 10s· 33as·: ;,:· ,-:-: "isa3""::"3521 . Fli Permitted··" ··· -~-· 0.95 ... 1.00 · _ .. ____ .......... 0.77 .. 1·.00 .. 'o.95 .. 1.00 ..... , ........ 0.95··--·1.oo"·- .. es--.;_,··-"m"" · .,., ,• ·•-••,, if'', •' ·-· -•-,• -------• "' -~---••-·····~·••"~··••-"•··., ... ~ .. ··.,•··~~--,····-.,.,.~"'-*' ......... , ""''·"·" .~ .. -· .. -, 'T,.--.,..,,•-.n;; • ··-,. ---. --·•--••-···-· "• -Satd. F:low'(perm); I: • · · 1736· · ·1717,"'. ·:·"'. . ... · , , . 1'162,,-2856,i 1708: , 33135 " .. :CS:·,.:;. :1683. _,., 352'1 ·.·.' , • l Volume (vph) 48 5 3 19 5 235 3 562 35 341 1247 55 Peak':1jourfact6r; PH~{ 0.78)>/b:78 .. ·;o:78~:· 0,86; •; 0.136 'J:·0.86 ,,)·0_94:-:_ b,94, .. '.0)4;C:. 0.94;.,_0;94~" • 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 62 6 4 22 6 273 3 598 37 363 1327 59 13:tol'fReidiicliciii(vi>tiY;-::"'":'.;:a,:·::;•:i~-: .. ~0·7··,7::·:cF; .C:'··.·o:•·.· 3i2'-; , .. o~ ::-··:·:·~c · '.:·:;o;:r" ... ::~o·:··:;;):;, ' .. :-~o Lane Group Flow (vph) 62 7 0 0 28 181 3 631 0 363 1384 0 Heavy Vehfi:ies· (%):::.::.,;::.; ::;<1"/o,;:; ... ;4%:~·:·'4"/~:,:: :T2%·,;:,c:•:2"lo •,r·,2°;,.•;:;,,--2% ·;: .~ 26/0: ;~::~%" ···::·1%·.;:,;:,, :1°1.:·~·:· .;·1% Turn Type Prot Perm pm+ov Split Split eJot~·c~ea;ehBSes\--:,;~ ·-~-.. ·i,-".'.:,~: ~4~::;: ~~:.~-.a··:.,-,·~,~~·-1/, ·2::.~·-·;·-~,~·;;~ ~.::··.~~·:::'"'3~; .. ~:·~·~:~,:~C1:~·,.-,: ::'{f~·.,~ .~'..~~1~'.··~~'..,;· :·~?-; :~-.... :·:i:; ~;~.~2;.,:··. -·· ~j Permitted Phases 3 3 A"ctua!'e9.;Gree~;,<fls)-::-:•r "if{,, ·.15~ , .... _ : .. . ,.·;.·";;-4, 7 ·5s'2::_;•:·~o:1:i'3]f~~·:. ":,;; :: ·eo:s·::-·-e·o)' 7 ''} I EffectiveGreen,g(s) 6.4 15.1 4.7 66.2 31.4 31.4 61.5 61.5 Aci'ufafecfg'1c·Ratio ·'..;::;.70:os> "0~137 ;,;,0 •.. ::: .. ,. ":~-~'7:~·;·o:a.or:;'1n,s;;i;: 0;2ll.J;~;·tr26_:·, ,:.:;: ·: {"c>'.s)~:'··-o:fi.1r:-: '' ·, ·;1 Clearance nme (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s('. .. : '3.0 ;" . 3.0 \ · :: ' ·~'·• " '· · ,",,3.0,•• ·' ,,.•·4,0 < 5.0 ,,., .'5,0: ·.: . •. .. '•)(b; : .:4,0 .. : ::'" ' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 93 216 57 1576 447 886 863 1805 W~ -~}[~ ~,tr£>: : . ;::~ ''.q,6;_ti{,'.:o:oo;: .. ~ .. ;: .··I .. '. ::·::'.~!;~·d'.ai::.s:.~;~g::..~.gq: §.Q:1 t~::i: ~~ : tf?~; 'cj).f0:;::::-.. ·:: : . ~t.<:.J~)!ii:i'.·-~:.~. ::·~: -•-· :".:!J.6.1,·_;:0)>3~:: ... r::;_«"t~:_ :'I9~"ii:·:·.9I:t'·~g:C?t ... Q,1_1::L _, ""°''1?; :_0:11_ ;_:::. Uniform Delay, d1 55.8 46.0 56.5 12.9 32.8 40.2 18.2 23.5 !':'t.og{~!i's1§d):ll.<:.!s>L :': : : i~Qb ~ J.oo' . · .····: , : ·· ~;:·::Ufa :c)1>.6.:•:_;:t91i:·2: 1.-9.9. ~::::: ::::::.: t~t .:::.:0!.9~-:_:-~,;:'.'.c Incremental Delay, d2 16.6 0.1 6.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 1.1 2.3 tiel~v:<sf ""c:t.:.x '·. . 72,3 ·;, 45.1,.;" .. :';;:,..::::.:· ·:::o):o ·.:~1i.9I.::32:s :; 43;6 :" .. 7.···;17,T ";24.}~-:-~;.~·; Level of Service E D E B C D B C Appro~~tf·q~1~y :@ .. ~"0.·: •. : __ :.: ••.•• ~il:J.. . ,i·:-·· .-:~_::}:St§: 0: :;:_·; .. ~ .. :·;-:__·~·-"~~~~ :;::,:_, :: : .. :,.:'.: .. tt13_; ~_-_ .J Approach LOS E B D C Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 21 St. &SR 515 1/23/2009 ,Frt,j''.;;f'f. ·_ '.-~~-;'.'. ~·:t:' ... ~:.,':.;-)'i:'.°S~j· '.<'J: 60~~:{'(f 8!H,:~irC~'.~,~i,"J,· .::, ~· /:,:".~.;~~:.i.i.~j·;~~~ .~·'' ;; .. -,,>~ ,~1~ 06'.~' 5:1:o~c~-r;'.-/'.:'·~ ;~ ....... _:a''. t'::·:~ .. }-~ -~: ~p.97_-"·.~,,," .:~·<J Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 ,1,11tdfF1ow(pJ-ot>}':". :;;; e11,1b: ).§~3-· ; ; ;; :,, .. :·" · :::: :· .:~>-~-"':.:17sg,•·, 3592< · r:, :.. ·,. ·• 3393"': _:,::,, Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. i=low•(pe/m):s t· 'U•TZO:C .1583'." ,;,-,. ·a"', . , ',,,·", :, '·','.!:' ,;-,,,,tf1796' , 3592(, ,;,,~, f: (i;~ ;3393:·~ .. I Volume (vph) 291 0 76 0 0 0 28 434 0 0 1183 229 Peak'h§u~Jactor;,f:HFC --Q.9Q~.' · 1.00:-': o.75~/,1•.oo:· /j.90 •·;1:0o".~·;tf5t1', .JL_!!_O •. ;:;Too;,, 1_.00 , o.92 · .:-0:82 Adj. Flow (vph) 323 0 101 0 0 0 52 482 O O 1286 279 Rtoi{Rec:JiiclionJvplif.' : :'.a·::::·'.:: 1s···-;;-o' =-I/a~-.-.~ a ~--·;·.,a,: :~;···er·•~-• :-0-_;3_::o .····:;ro::~:;:,12-'··:: ·o Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 26 0 0 0 0 52 482 0 0 1553 0 IJ"Lfrri··Ty~e-. '; 'Y~f":~r-;. ·;-:~.,L .. ··.£' SJ)lit·~1":;L!>;i{i' .. ,. -,: ''.'" f'' .... P·e·r:m':. ~. ·;:·.·::~ ';: :··. ~ ;_~ ,.,~:;:;;;: .·f~rOt .... ', •' ,: . ~!·1~· ,;··L.: t/.,'.:' ~·.-~ Rfot~ .. '.'. ~:.:"· >'.·~·\,,_:··~. ~-1 Protected Phases 4 4 3 1 6 5 2 ~ermwteg·:·1~Ha·ser:·:r:2:··,:.·:::·;~i:;:r~ ... -f;y-~~. 1T'.Z ;~ .:.~;.~i .. -:: ,2T""":f''"'"~T:1r·~.·:~~7'\V;'·:~;,:·~~t~~. · ~:·~·~~~;'.~~·:·:;'.·:::;s:;·~~;~:~': .. •,::-i':,~:·~:;:~~;::-: '~. -~;,;,:., l Actuated Green, G (s) 21.4 21.4 8.0 48.8 45.3 ~ffeEttve· Green;'. 9"( $). ~~~:, ·:·. 22 ~'4 ;, :(·22.4 ·\:_;.:_:'!·;,: "· .. ~· '.' ·-~~~ •. ,, ~ :~~~J,,1://··:·~ / ':: : ' ·,),, '.1 j'··:~·,:,/:·· ~;o:~; .. ,. SQ:,a ... ~.:>~·; · .. ':"· :""-,,.~, ~:°.'.~<<-.,. . ;·: 4 7 ;~;~.: .. ~ .. ' ·,.~,; Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.58 0.54 9Je1ian_c~,~:nrru~ -(s) • .';~ ~: ,.;_,;;;~£,(4; () i <•· ~~-~ o:::· >" '< ·; , .: ;.!J).'~: 0 ' 1.' -~-~~,,,,':,:~~/~';:~., "~ :., '~;~~,.,t~' f !~J;~7';.4: o.:;·:m:r ; s: Q '.~ •;•_);~ ; I\: ,;;; ,;·; z·i'·,,., f, : '·-~, '..:..;:;-5: o~-'.' ,,-•,~/,~l j;: :~1 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 im8rsection1Surnrnaryi,;f.~~.:,'. ~-~t'.tZ .i·; ,:;j~·~~;.: ::> ~ i 1: . .,~~> · •1 ~-;.-• ·:1• .:_ 11-... ,,, · .Y-: -\ ~: '.~ ""'1 :::· -~-... : .>£~'!5.:~ .. ~1:~·,~ i. ·~ ,.h:~'.'i' :: ;-; ~"="~'?.:,;._ ,,.· "1 !;l~M Aiierage C6.!)tro1Delay_ ,_ .. , ... : , .2+;a:.'. · .. · . H_c~~L~~IJ?f,§!lrv[c!! .. ·::· :~-· :_ · _.g~ ·_ , , "'.: :..... , · :.· HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0. 75 t5c1uaiec(cyc1e.Leng1ti'<sC·, .. • .. · ~--. •· ;; :.:F a1i:t' ::· ··'.:· :;sum oflost tfriieJs> "·· ;;r ;-:.-·: · · e :a",:.· _ .. .. ·,,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B ~fl~lyiiiP~r/Cl~}rn,irj(,.~,,'':.·: .... :2·:~:''JE:: •:.·.:.···=:::·.cc··,.,,, .. , ... c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 108th Ave SE (Benson Rd S) & SR 515 1/23/2009 HCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service A HC_ty,, vo1urr1e ~to-.capaaw~,rat10-··:: ,,;: --~'!;, -~,-~·-::~6~}'1~,.·_, ~ ·::,--~-fi ·?,:::. _~!, i.: .. ~;-~_:·::.;.:· :~··;'.·_-T:'.: .. ~(:··: -~::,,~:~,, .. -~~-;,;' ·:. ~:-<:~·i~-_:,-, !.~:;~:\:,_ ~ ;"·· c.,:s:. ,, Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.7 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0 intefae_rifio"6:¢~i5.~i;itV!:!iilii~tiif :i :· · : ~~-?'.'§ :··:,:·,:;!~l,J .c!3Y.~(cit ~~i'Yi!,8. ~·::~: ~-,~·,~-I c ·.T: ~; : :;~ ·:;: ::~'.': : :: ; Analysis Period (min) 15 c·:, c,,uca1;ca~e~Grodp:,~::. :-:.,·-·...: _·· .· . Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak · Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SE 176th St & SR 515 t 1/23/2009 Movem¢nt~:~:,~-;;:~:;:IT:si::.,,EBt;t' EBFF"''IWB~WB1Vf:WEfR:"::iiJBL~r~I:lf:<NB~i:"2SBfE::'slffi Lane C?nfiguratio~s-. __ "l. tl> __ ·: .. -'t __ tt. _ --·_ ... "J 1t. ,tl> ... r'l''j. __ tlo .... Ideal Flow;(yphpl);,_;;'._,',. -·19op :.C:1900·"",J900•· ,j9oo: . __ 1900 · :1900(1.190,0 ;i1._900. _ _,1900;___,1900 ... __ 1900 ·: 190Q Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lanf!'),til, f§ctor::L :,:: n.J:oo,::.o•,95 · ,J. ~'.'c'. ,1.00 :; ,0.95; . :.,,> -Jo,97 ·, ·01is r' . ·;,;.)::o.97';_-0,95,'i. .·', : Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Ei}_Protectea , } ', :,.> ::.· 0:95:r_Joo : ;: ''; -_ '.-0.95:·:::: 1:00 ,; -· · ';.·. ,\: 0195; ·. ·.1.00,.;::_;.: • \,:, 0'.$5'.<,1'.oq. :, ., . :j Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3533 1752 3404 3433 3382 3467 3549 Fjf Pei'riiitted::··-·-: .. , ·:::·a:s~: 01:00:·-_----~-' c ·o~95;•,, roo· _:c ..•. -~--,·.:·o'.95~ · 1.oti::-·: ·:::: ·:-:-ci;-9s··:1.ooc-·,• -, Said. Flow (perm) 1787 3533 1752 3404 3433 3382 3467 3549 lntersectlorl[sUmmary ";~t;:,.~·~ .,:·:: ·.~::,· (' ::~ ,.~·~:~'P!!:.t.~. { : i1;~'~;·~·.1, .:.:~4,p .,,:~. ' .• ,_ ~-~;·-~.~ ~~; '~. ~-,;· i ~~:~_ ·~':'.' 1-".: '!1;,~· ·-~' ( 1·:_,. ,. . " " f. './/r,,·;. ,,. , ... t. ' ·d fi9N!:~V.E!(!lgE!C::o~trqLD~ll!Y., "'' ::" f,_7,7... '•',,1-iqiyi Ley~! ~f,§,~[ViCE! : ;,,, .s ·-.. : .. ' . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 AcfuateifCycle Leingitj (sj .,, ' ,.· · 0 ies:o · ·_ · ,. Sum of los!time (sF , . , :io6:9 _, 'C -- iniersection Capacity Utilization . 94.9°i " •. lctT Level oi Service" F Analysis Peiiod·(min) · · ·; --· -· 15 · -· · --· c -Critical Lane Group . Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Pages I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 192nd St & SR 515 <l- 1/23/2009 \. Movement:· .. lt·•n,~:;";a,!sl:'":;•,··EBT'J:.. ·EBR".':WEii!:;W&t,.rWsR~l3fililfBl'~Bl{?'"SBL::7;'SB:f~ Lane_C~~figurations_ .... ---··--4 _J., ........... 4' __ fl ...... 't.tf> ___ ... 'l. _tf..,.. .. . ldealJ;lciw (vphRIJ: ·;: .. ':/'1900. ,. · 190!)· ',.1.900 · .. 1900:, :;1900:,-·,1~00 ;,_1900 ;_ 1900: .... 1.900: ·. 1900' :.190CL_ 1900 Grade(%) 0% 8% 1% -1% TotaL:t:9St!!meJ§)i.it:,:/.-; /:'\·, \: .:·~:: ·.~'3:0:: ·_:, ._9~0'.~,. ~.-~.-r .. ·~,.<3:o· .~.'·:~.,J:"O".'.'t': .. _:··,}~P~~:, .'3.o. ,-.-~-~-<:}.:'. ~--,,_~;o:~_:'·'-";p:o ,.<'· ·_-;· __ .,.~ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 E•t::X:·:·~-;r .,: ,er:··. , :.~ · . ·.· ·· · ·: ·;1 .. 01i,, .. a.as·: .... _'T':';.,1.00 'it o.as;: .. ·~ .. 1 .o.or:,.,o .. sa·/· • . '.·.: 1.00 ·. _0'99;:' ,;. :~i Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~~t~~~!;~~iolj ··;~ ·· .:· · :·:: · · . · 1:-~~-,: .· \sg~-~-::~r-: ~;: ·· \ s~g-· :1d.~~ ·. ·31~~-.-.·· .. .. · · V.~~--~-~s~~/ : ::·-~ sa1c1··i=1iiw"<permVT, ·.:.-::' , ·, :1a11r:~:·1 sils"'··" .. · .;:, · '1 tZ!f · 1 s20···.11111:,34ss· · • "'"~: :·1 rss:c • ·3ss1::·• • ,·, Volume (vph) . . . 35 258 . 78 137 . 48 ... 97 ... 28 . 528 81 210 . 825 . 51 Peak,hour factor,'PHF ,,0"'84 , 0.841, 0.84 ·:·• .0.86 .. , . 0,86 .:.,;o:86: ; 0:93 .. '0.93 :' .0,93 ·: 0,90 .. · 0.9o·:o.9o Adj. Flow (vph) · · 42 307 93 159 56., 113 30 568 87. 233 917 si Rto~.J~educi,(>n'iviilii .. : ;';::o,·:· ,:·Jc,··,4s·: _o:~:·;~·o:;~;ti' ·::7-:0;:: 1 r· ·:'o:''".'' :o.: -,·1:-::· a Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 349 47 0 215 41 30 644 O 233 970 O Heavy.veliicies ·(%/';::· · ;c.1% ·:.:· ·,1%: .-1%:'··· ·2°i.::·:.··.:2°i;·.· , 2"/o·:·:'.i .. 1.%: ;_, ·1%'·· ;,1ofo· :···:·1°,,.;-:·, '1% ··,,· 1°1J Turn Type Split pm+ov Split pm+ov Prot Prot ~~~~~=~ ~~::::;=: ·, .... : ;Jz•;-;.:01 ~~:.·;:· ~: ;'.:'&".;:' c;:a;· :·,-;r:=~;·s. '''." 2·· ...... ·r ;· :·:·.·1 :'. : 6'-~.;.'·3 Acfil'ated.G~een:·:cnsF;: :·:: .... ·:2 :2s~1-.:·:io.EF! ~s:I\~,Ei; :·36:a":;;s·:·tc '2!l.o · :..::.:·:''~Ko::"2i1:s: "" ·') Effective Green, g (s) 26.7 33.7 20.5 40.0 7.0 31.3 19.5 43.8 Asf ii~l~~ii,c:: ~J@2.': :'.:'. ;, ;~:-~'.:.:.Ji~l· .:JJI::;,:t:••··.· ,\a,·1~:'~ o,~_tf:Ci:2~2: if 2a??::;2•.• :,:;_o)§·.•·'_ ~Q'.1Q~:1• ._·:::c Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 vefiic1e>i:,x1Eirision (sf ·.: ,-::::·; :·: <i~o ·: 3·,s. · · · ·: ·,;· 3,5. :.: :rs·:::" 3'.!i ~ ·. ·,ro··· :,~,· : ',. 2.s -,·:4:0 ·· ' •.1 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 454 490 321 594 113 992 318 1418 t;f~{ll~:,~t; . ':.::: ~ ~-·1,· ;~:cP,1}l_;:lgf :•::_· ,··;_~cij_2,:; ~:il•;,·: §'02;,_ .o:t~:::':.; :i·-i:Q)3 .• ',c;O:?z :·~ c: .. ·. vicRatio·. ;· . '" '' . "o'.1i Ji.09.,-· :·0 0:st ·0.01.· 6~21_ Q.,6~:.. .tJ.:1:i'if~87 ~-'' (jnfform oe'iay,"ci1 ,• .· .. ' ........ 38 8 '' 273· .. , ,. , ' ........ 41 6 _·· 2Z:a ' 49. 1 34.5 42.8 27.4 pf§gfe_ssio~Fjc\~r_:•. :::fc59:~:(o_o_ _ _ J_.99···.J.o_q;:·1.09,·_roo.'?. · · ·1.00' 1.00 . __ :•: Incremental Delay, d2 8.1 0.1 5.4 0.0 1.5 3.3 8.0 2.7 e~tr~~[f~;6~;::~ :;:: ,;·;:_·_:' ·;1.~~~::~r2z 2_ ., .... :: , .,j?;g::_ ·=2_?~_,, .. s.0..6_ .·._ 37g.·-·-~ ::: ".-:· 50'.~ , -30,6, .. __ ; ..•. ~~~f~:~tr~~y(sY : ' ,;· '.1 ':it2.~: .:· · . :; _,;_:3J\r:: .. ·, : : --:3~~ci :· ~····-:·" . ,::;34_6 · : .. HCM Average Control Delay 37.2 8~11!1\@yrnft~ ~a'kacify}aij~ ;,,:.:._,,..,;:tt.J·.· .... , Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 lj,t~r~ect[gn ~a·J)~~iti Qtfliiation : ~' " 6t!!o/~ ..•. , Analysis Period (min) 15 ·",; " .... -,,-~'J;i'ili~L,fne·<:3!Ql!P; •· '·:; :.::·;_ , ..• _ ..... _: =~-' ... . _, ... ,. ·•~ .•.. · ' ..... , .. ;_ ... -, -~·., .... -~.-.... -·-·· Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW 43rd ST. & SR 167 NB on ramp 1/23/2009 ftiFPfOt{ct~O£~:~*~t1::r~~:·,,~::oT9·s·,r~?.,Y·oo·rr-~;~o,rT·;~;:,,;7~:1;;;r~r1.;·oo:~~~~:pgo·;}~:~·.crg_sJ;:~;;·o~ss·r:1~1·:ptf;,~_:§J~~:~1~\t·;~~·:.:f:~:_y:/i~;J:f~t1i1 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 3539 . 3539 1583 1665 1669 1568 i=iii5ermitted-~·::a:··-· ·· ·· o:ss '1 oo· ·.::-· ·· C'c~' 1 :oo"7foo -·o:gs-'"ci:§s·::-r·oo ·· .. ·· ·.· "' ·· ··· · ~-~ ·: Said. Flow (perm)· " 1770 3539 · 3539 · 1583 1665 1669 · 1568 · · · -· N',_61ume:cvptj) ~1;sE2e&~7:;:·' -~ ff~['.'.,'Ji~3-8:\.~ :·2032,::We:¥:~ft'.::O' ~-.f'f~Itii9:,.~:JI:1oe?:2~t49..1'/;:;!t~302f"s{(S1" .. -... ~:··1F~i+~:37£;',:}:l:]1:p_·iy.~:··( ... ~.o ~; _:::e~/i':~t) Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj.'Flow{vph};L··c .. 363._ 2185 · O · .:o _1155_.A36 __ ,373 ,_ .. 1 _ 462 .. · o ~-·· o ·,··. q RTOR Reduction (vph} 0 0 0 0 0 206 0 0 7 O O O _Lan~eJG?Oi:ipJ~·io~rcvphj~-1;~.:i:3·E?~:~21_·as::~:1~i11~.-.-_o :···:~·:.; ,X£{f~:~·-1Ts-$~~;:6~-30::':~~.~: nft;rn,~:,~::.1·s·7:.:~1::~1r:,4·ss1.~~~-.•. ~)·;\nm·;;:;.:r:;::0}1~{:f.;"d Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% '.fl:irl1T}'pe ..... -.: ... }'.0:';; ,~ ~ :· .. ·':'rqt-·_ ·· __ . ,·. --_ ., -" . ___ .. -._· ·---.. ___ J>erm.,.. Pem:t ___ ....... _2perm-. ·,:·-.,,_ -~" _ . __ .... ~.::·· _· _; Protected Phases 5 2 6 4 "··-··---· --·:·, HCM Average Control Delay.'. ... ·. , · 41.3 .• , _HCr.1_L~'£!ll_qf~~rvice. D . -· i-ifM volume to capacityrat1o ·-.. .. o.95 ~ci~~1@:.~YE.li.L~~gtr,'.(~)!},,1,:. :.·:,: •. ,:J:~?.Cl· ·~ ,; :i:§i_u!Ji.§t!§~l'.l!r:n.i{(~l:7:.-:: ~;:;:·. ~·-... · ·:I~.6., cj.: .-.,, ' Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.0% ICU Level of Service E Aiia1ysisPeriod(min) · -, ' -• '· · · 15 · · · ·· -·, ,. · · c-criticai.Lane Group . • • . . .. . -. Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2008 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest --· -:.·. --.. Synchro 6 Report Page? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency /Co. : Date Performed: JGT TENW 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #8 -SE 172nd St/lOBth Ave SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Existing Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: 108th Ave SE (Benson Rd S) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period {hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement Volume 41 0.93 44 1 304 0.93 326 Undivided 0 1 LTR Yes Westbound 7 L 9 o. 93 9 0 8 T 1 0.93 1 0 0 0 8 0.93 8 9 R 5 0.93 5 0 I Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%} Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0 Lanes 1 No I 0 Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config LTR V (vph) 44 C(m) (vph) 1188 vie 0.04 95% queue length 0.12 Control Delay 8.1 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue SB 4 LTR 9 1231 0.01 0.02 7.9 A LTR Length, and Level of Westbound 7 8 9 LTR 15 340 0.04 0.14 16.1 C 16.1 C 9 334 16 0.93 0.93 0.93 9 359 17 1 0 1 0 LTR No Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 32 2 34 0.93 0.93 0.93 34 2 36 0 0 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR Service Eastbound 10 11 LTR 72 405 0.18 0.64 15.8 C 15.8 C I 12 I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4. lf TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: TENW Date Performed: 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #9-108th Ave SE&l08th Way SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: u. s. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Existing Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: 108th Way SE/Project Site Dr North/South Street: 108th Ave SE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments Northbound --=~.,--,-,--~-,---~~~~~~-Southbound Movement 1 2 3 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement Volume~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) L T 322 0.90 357 Undivided 1 Yes 0 TR Westbound R 5 0. 90 5 7 8 9 L T R 5 0.90 5 2 0 31 0.90 34 2 Flared Approach: Lanes Configuration Exists?/Storage 0 No 0 LR 4 5 6 L T R 8 369 0.90 0.90 8 410 2 I 0 1 LT No Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 I I Delay, Queue Length, and Level·of Service~~~~~~~~~~ Eastbound Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR V (vph) 8 39 C(m) (vph) 1197 613 v/c 0.01 0.06 95% queue length 0. 02 0.20 Control Delay 8.0 11.3 LOS A B Approach Delay 11. 3 Approach LOS B 1, I I t J I- I I I I I I, I I ' I I ·I' I ,1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Grady Wy & SR 515 1/23/2009 Volume (vph) \ ,r ... '. ;. ·,, :x 62 :,' 712, > 660'. ·322 ' ''489:· ':,' 46 '. •:"'.382' ,, 328''. ;. 280'' .'•,Y55 ',, '627'(''"' 39 ,,.,_. _.,....,_,,~,;. .> ,.q -...,_,. ·L, .. .,f~_J;/,.,.~,,.,t.,..,._,..~,\-0 -w~"·'''· ,e "'"~""~' ,no«., :~.-,,.w,, ... .,.,_).q' ••~""'" ·· -··-· ,,~~.,,,., ... L,_,.., ~_.,.,. .. -~~ .. -....,.-,' ~,~~---·•~-·•--••· ~, -·M-. _ '-~-·-- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ajlj.JJpw,".(yi)fi);;;·,7,::;; .• ··i;·;:;"§8''.t:"rsz· :·:·12s::. 3~9 ;;~499~ '·'' 4j'·~·~"i2!F""3s[i' '311rt;:•·-.rso ,,-,,:.6,fl2 i'"',)4? RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 196 0 6 0 0 123 0 0 6 O ~ar\e,.GrOUP,f!o.,.,;;(vph)'. ;;')l!f'Z ,182' ~' 529: '. 329 ;''5402''' O"'.' '.429 ·.'"',561'~. ''.'; 0 ,;,.'·'.•60•,,!! 718·,' ~,, ,ci Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% [utr.11JY~:~;~:-'·t~1~-;{:. :.,_'.,;_ . /~-:·;:P,~()(; , . ., .·,r,-·· ).-~~~1:errr{·' :,,PJ'O[;'" ·"::/·"': ~, .. ~ ·-~·,y:.,:,,.,; _· .. p Ptcit· ·~·1t',.\_,l \. ~'·i'f.·.,. ,::,Aiffi··,,1~~·: :PrO_t ,.,4;,\o.".· ·~'~/ ",{r~,:,· ,;:~·~·~'·.:~ Protected Phases 2 6 5 1 3 8 7 4 P87mitH3~·~P,fi8Je~s··~:~!i .,.'..~~~·~w;:-:::,·-~ .. .,·:·'.··~-~-.. :~;0::·'."::·? :-ff??~;;5:f::"·~f·'~''"t·1s:~'." .~,i~-.' ::r .. ·~·1~::-~_:y:.:~·. ~77.: 1··1'.'·t:?·~-:;~~t-i:i;·:~:;:~'-,F ~)~ ~.:.; ,;;,.~--:':1 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 43.5 43.5 16.5 49.4 17.8 34.8 8.2 23.2 Effective'Green,'(hs)'\'0'£,1L6''44.5''''':44:5 · ,18!5 , .... 51:4 /'• 'c, ,;:"";19.8 '.·~35,8·, i···· •:.,,.\,.,9,g;., .• 2s.2,,,. · ... , ] Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.15 0.43 0.17 0.30 0.08 0.21 ~18j:1'r8ri~-Jir!)![( s );'.· ~:,.·liQ;}",5.0',;;: ;,, ,,,;:4'.0··': ,:),:. ·•10 4.Q?''I.'.< 5~0 ·~t:l~11:•l5;0;-"i~:,,.;0~·1.'.,:, ... _.'.t ?'~ O}~ .. :' ,_-4, C),.' f'. v•J'. 'w.~;,,:-,, ··:1 4,.0 IJ:~~-1,' 'j ~c[,._J·.: ... :[3 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 1 I I ·I I I II I I I i HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: S 15th St & SR 515 1/23/2009 -t r.novernemr .. ',;,:'·~::"'1'~Esl'"~:i,:I,stJF,Es~Wst!'{~iSWVEf~NsL"'""·NBT.•MNsR~ <sst ·.il'~SBR Lane Configurations .... ___ 'l ..... ~--... · _ _ ...... __ 4' ... Jlf ____ .'L ... tt> ............ 'i+tt> __ .. .. ld~l.f ~~(yp.t)plh__;Ji:,J~.QQ ;,J~,O_O ~\:c 1~.QW.-~~fl.9 _,_<l.§!Q.Q __ .,1.~_QO, ,:l~.Qfl_'.,,J!?.Q.Q 0,,1.9QQ;,,,_1~9Q .. ,,1_9.Q9,,1;.1 __ ~flA Grade (%) 0% -5% 7% -7% ;t~t~'ij .. Os(ti·meJS)! ... ,:~· ·· <::_;.fd., ·: ,,_.4.Q·:: ____ 1 ··_:,'., .. : ____ :t-:: ... ·\.:·: 4.o \. -f-O:·"L::4J) Y"'·''":_4-.o~.: .. :.:~·-· ... ·_:"1 .... •:: 4:iL. ·'_;.··~~o ·"·.; __ , .-:fl:· ; Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 f rt·: .-'."'':''i}J.t::.: ''.ii;{:'::,,~.-·1'.'(l:1: ,· '.c"~:· .. ,· ,i'·:-1.'.: 00 1~-~1,·-1 Oi94:(, ;_,-.. 1°-; ~,/,;i;_· ·,">·:···-. I.':~: 'Y;tf._oo ·., ± OJ35Y -~~ .1_:bo };:_;" 1;0:99~ ...... ·.~\. :·''.ci ;, ;•'.~·.op .. ,. '.i.,'.9:~9 --~1-t, ... ;,_.; :! Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 safu:_ ~io~(proi)u·.· ;; __ ::1t3s:·:)7:1··c .. ···-·:;; . _ ;, _-j 836; :2ass--·11oa· ,3386"'"""_-,,··-fss3"''js2T. ': '. '] Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Sati:f Flow':(peFm)"' 't' -T1736'"T· 1111"•··""';'':'Y ·,; -:,"':'•::14ss ~ :-2sss ;c:11osT: 3386;;-·:/ :,· :,;-:,T683: , ~352 i • .. :, .. ::.:: Volume (vph) 51 5 3 20 5 249 3 606 37 362 1327 58 r,ea1<=Hoi:ii,;taciof~PH~ .;_;;:;o~78 :T: o. ~Ji7 ;: o. 1iF, io:aa~, -;:o:a1f:,;, o~E(:. , o~s( ·a:crQ-( .. _ · 0.94 .·;· o--: $'ii:-::-o.94,::: o:.s~ Adj. Flow (vph) 65 6 4 23 6 290 3 645 39 385 1412 62 RTORReduciion:CVi5ti(':·::·:~ o;··:, j';··--_1r_·.··•·-_ ·o ,·,_:·o·;----ai' : ,, .. ·o···,··4·-· 7·. ·o·· ·:c:1"0:''"~ •·,2-·,:;·o Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 7 O O 29 208 3 680 o 385 1472 o Heavv vefiic1es'<%Y.> . ,.;:,,;11%:--.·,:4%'· ;;.,4%" .. ,;;;,2%:,.,;c .-2% :.7:· 2%:· .:-.,~2'1o~: ~ 2% , --~ 2%· ,, .. 1.% :: .. 1°1,·• .. 1 °1~ Tum Type ___ . .. Prot _ _ _ Perm _ _ _ _ pm+ov _. Split SpHt ~l'oiected·~hases;·_;,;,;·-_ ;;·4; ... ···8:·~.--····_· · -~ -·-,:• · ..... ·3·: ,·;· :r:·:··· __ .h ..... ·,"i':'··---:-2 :·:,, Permitted Phases 3 3 ~~i.Q~\e.~:c..;f~.[n::cn~,·0r:·]"4·E :_'L?f ., t ·_·r.•:.:~:.z· ,,~·-:.1:1. ·,,:~ ?':{=~1.1"0 :.'~ff . , =1~11)]i:§~J.::. ·,;:~: Effective Green, g (s) 6.4 15.1 4.7 65.2 32.4 32.4 60.5 60.5 Actuaiecfglc;R"alio·;~;,.:":,:-o: 05;; .§ j :i'[~;i;,::~ ··;,: : .. ~.. :;;_ \.6, 04 ·;~: o,s4·r,:··ci:2f'· 0:27;; : .. :: ~-',o}g~,..,-o:so··· -,-: Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Veiilc1e·Extei\s1oii'(iij""1· ·;3·:o·:" ' ·3·:o .. _ ..... ,,, .... ·s.'': "'"'.'' . 3~0 r: ... ,fo ... ';'s.cf,i ; 5:0.•, '··"'' ,: ·:·:,·:-4;0: ,. :· 4,0 ·. ,'' intefseciiO"rZ.SO'mmary'Hj., .·. ·~'J, ·,1·:'Jl '. -'·~;. &', ··~;~i: · it.iJ.:1·.S~·' "t,: , · ,.~~·.·:·3i~ .;s.~~'.,,-,.f f11. ,!.~ ~11~11{. ·• ~ ~;,h-·,,·J .,~·. :1~·;/."·:·,(-;,,, ./ .. ," •. :.,1:.,:;·,~.·,i; .1.: ,;t;_,;,1 <~t ·.~ .-lf . ./,J ~J HCM Average Control Delay 29.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM \/01umeio~capacify iauci" •. ~ . . o.78 · ·· · -----· ·· --·;:: : .. " :~ :·: ... --.. · ... · Actuaiect cycie't.:ength 'isi" ,, ' . ,, 120:0 ·"-'su;:;; o'flosttii'ne (s) ~-. 16.0 ...... . intersection Capacity'Utiliiation '. . 74.3% .:.-· .. -r ICQ'Le"!el'of Sifvice , D AnalysisPeriod{min) -. 15 c.·.J,: Grm·s~f g-~h~~9.r.9.liR-..:.:~ ii,t{~ ..... :,!_~._. .,.~ .. ~--,-··-,_--;~, ·. :,.~:1.,~:i:,~. -"·,11, •.•. ,:.,. -,. ,.,u--<.,_., __ ~J'a N.,~,,i,. __ .,,,, .. _ -, •. ,,_,,,,," .... _, .. ,,.,,._: .. , ,,.;1-,, ..• j, .... _._ -~· __ • :. -.,i; _ -... ,·, -~ .. "-·· • Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 201 O Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page2 I I I I .I I I 'I I 1· I .I I I ·I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 21 St. & SR 515 -I> 1/23/2009 t Moveinent,1 ~J f&JI, ,;,, ~,.;,EamB~sff,::ws~ws~v,7!fR'F;lila~~NBf~lfR""C::"'ssi:':""sllt1::"S°"BR ~~Confi,g,urali~s ,,...., __ !i~--'to _____ ---------· ,t,.~---___ . __ 1; ___ i'f.. ___________ "i ___ tf. ____ .. Ideal Flow' (vphj:ll) ".-;, ;'''•''1900 •''1900·'"'' 1900· '."•1.900 ',, 1900 «:»,,1900.t "1900';-'· 1900,, C.1900,. ,,1900; , 1900, ··;,,190·0 Grade (%) 0% 0% ·--3% ... -----· "·-----i%·--·--·- [OMf~O_stJ~irfl~{S}'7_. ::-r·~,~~>-_:tcf~.~. · <:~:3. o_:~_ ·, ~! t · :i' ~'<'.' ·i :~1 .. ~. 1 ~ , ... ,:·: ry,_"·1'r··· :,. ::,.';,.~:· .·~· '·'·3:0~~-, ,,:~. <3~ o.,._-... ~>.~-1-' , -.-(: . ::, ~i:::7~·;::::.~:?--;b ~,:,.-I:/:J Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fri--... -~i--7JX,:,k.·-~,-·ii·,.· 1:i-;~. ·1 <,>~C-66, .~:,'.O.e~-<~ .::,\., ~~-·:. -~ ... ;~-:~~=-:~·:· :,.:~,. ',{· ·" ":·, ·(., ~,._ "/'··. ;~roo ~<;· ·1~00 · :-;~> --~~:,,.··-:.% · ·:: r .... ~·-·?· o~ ~z.1~ '~'.!~~ :~;? Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 §_atd);lo~(prot)y.,i~ .. 1,77;0,,i:15133,, ' .. ,,,?~ c'el•,:l~, .. '.,."': ·s,-,,d~ ,1]96.,,)59.2,' .. ,·:·. ···-· ',;'' ;'' ~9.2 :· ... , .• Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 saidfflow-(perm) .. · .,,,:,1:710,·.,,,f5a3,<,,,,., .. ,;:, .... ,,.,· .;.,,,,,,,:_.,.,,,, .. ,,,,. :::-r;.,,1.796; .. :'3592 ,:·,. ·: .. ·,-'. ~'3392·.7, . ·: Volume (vph) 319 0 81 0 0 0 30 460 O O 1255 247 Pea1Enour,1ac10F,:F>HF''Y'o 'go''~ Too''"" o:is'"';1 :oo'' ,;;-1 ·,oci-, ,·il ,oo·;"o7s,r · ro:so:,;:.-17: oo, ;::1',cio ,r Jfs2 'i. craz '"'~",.,.,,· ·~~,.,-,,.,,.,,,~ .. , -'"•bwS..,..,,~,.~~-~·-,~,.,.-.,-""·"•-·-•..o', _,,. ~--••H~ • w-.. ·~•·-· .. ,.,_. -·•-• •---~ -~ . -~ 'i.-· -C· ---· ' --.-. .• _.._ l' ·• • ' -. ·--~----~ -""-···-•-" Adj. Flow (vph) 354 0 108 0 0 0 56 511 O O 1364 301 ~tbR);~eductio'i((vpHJ:i~'>J:G ;;;~s:,;,: : ~: o·.: :::;;,~:q'"''::',:,·o;·:::c~·. cf,' ''T O' .. ·' ' " a'', ·•,:_:o-,-;: '"''6:• ''". 1'fT·, '''Q Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 29 0 0 0 0 56 511 0 O 1653 O fl\.lfh';Type,,~1·/,: ·'·f' i ;. ·rf'•· '}" ,;. '', SpJitil;y l I": .i~\-_~:.· ~-1· ...• :. :.<)-Perm\:~. t,·i, ·<~ ··'it , .. ,., , , ·, .. , .,;;;_~~'.::,,~p-rot .. i::. ... ,:-<,;::· ~: <·:~-,,. -~ '" ... S,,;J~iOt ~ ~;,:; ~-:.-: ;>_··_,'"!; ~--~ .. ; Protected Phases 4 4 3 1 6 5 2 P0rmltt8d.'Pti'8"S8~f': u,,;_. 0 ->~·,,,.,.~.1 -s ...... ,, ·, · .. \-" ,, .-... 1•· ·« .. -:~ ., ··_. -..... ·-:;:;:. 3 ,· ~,, \\i.· .. ' :/ ,., :·. 5. ~ "_! ·'.'·1~.~. ,,_., 1:-~·-·, ·-:~" ... ·"::·~,'Ji:._,( .'<:·· .. ·:.:_, > -:·.;.0,·· \.:,,-,J .. ;j; Actuated Green, G(s) • 232' 23.2°'' ·. "'. ' ' 8.2 49.0 45.3 Effei:fixe';l3re~n;·1nsf' r:21':2''" .·21:.2';'.'l''''''':'•7'',,'''; crw' ,; ',.:, -. 7: '.B.2 ? 51 :o :,7 -,;,:.;;, ·;·7:c::::r4f3:, ):·, : Actuated g/C Ratio_ 0.27 0.27 0. 10 0.57 0.53 ~leai~ncffi! . .Jiflle[(S).~ ;.~:;. -v~·::;;-4,_ o"_-_" -_,..-.•. '41.0,~: '.,,,>~.: .. \.· .",.:_ ''(, :1 .... \' .·: ~·~· ~ ··':.i'.., •. ~-.. ·.· ''.'·.'.~'":-~to .. ·.~~·'i··,:, S·:Q·:.\ · '.?., _'·"_ "iy .·"5·,:'.! .. ,.< ··j.>·,:r s.·qt_t--·~ .. ~.r,~. ·1-'.i Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 · 3.0 5.0 5.0 taneGrp Cap(vpb)' _',:478,_~427',:. ·, ,. ,., ,., .·· ,,_. ,,,_ ..... ;, · __ ';,, ,184 ,;;.204t,, .. >-._ .. · a; 1789 '.·. : vis Ratio Prot c0.20 0.02 c0.03 0.14 c0.49 !;iCM Average Control l;}elay O ,,,' ,, ··. 26.0 .,.· ·,, , . ,;f:!Qt,II _Le_yel.9_f SE!l'V)SEl; '· '' __ .::; ~L ,.C.:, HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 ~il~tl11~:g:fistrti~1i11~~r · -r~llt: : ~ ·.; ~t~Jtlr:1tftrJI( -.-:_;: :.,: >J,g·; ~,,:, .... ·~··, -~··)",,.~"'·' --. e.r.jiilyji!ifii@:J'.(ni@ "'7_ :2 15 -·--' " > - c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page3 I I I i l I I I .I 'l I I, I I t ·I I ·I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 108th Ave SE (Benson Rd S) & SR 515 1/23/2009 Mcivelne~WS~·:WS~NBt~NEfR~SB~SBT,.t 1_','1?#~9;:j_~··!·rfJL4·" ;1'~--~~-:1;;,":111~~"*-:~;,~t·r.-.~ .. !,~}ir~-~ Lane Configurations If r' tf. 'i tt lde0ao::·,2~<YRhfii) ~1ts' ::~.--.. ~(J 9QO~~~ii19QO, .. ·: '_:1, 900·:1' 1.a·oo._s_ 1'90o: ~.!~1990''~ '·t· '{{I, ~-~,-:, ~ ··:_<'·', .;.',::,_-· ~~-.-·:~~"'•,,,._,:·i;: '-~:-;>~~·:-if~,---~' •\, (<1 ; 7 •, -'~('~ Grade(%) -3% -3% 3% [O!~EL])SfJini~X~nr:.;,:.:t::~~;:a]f:,I:'~~Q;:·i:·:r}'.0::-~·:::.::·:~:;~:·",":!';;:~~~9"''~'.'.~.,:3~0·.·:··~:i~tri::?]:~\::~~l.P,,j:y!:,?:'.i·T,;~'-ilr'..~_;-t~Y:_?;'7::!if/'.;[f7.~:_::i;:-l·:1 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 --·-·------·-···-- .. -,;] " -"' . r ~,, .. · .. ,_,,,,,., '!""' . -~-·.-.. • .,•,.,.,• m,', -,>0 ••• h-,, ;, •-~~ M ·,.~,.i 0° ,..: " ·-~-~· HCM Average Control Delay ... ·.. . . . . 9.8 ... · .· .. HCM Level of Service A BtM Yii@i)f1§:f~e~~iy"'.f.~u.s-~·:,,-~--:,' -o.'?.4.:: .~ ·;/::_ ::s = :'" :7;}, :'. ':: Actuated Cycle Length (s) 54.7 Sum of lost time (s) frifej's~c~i,~:t#iki3~ty L!!ilit~tio_b'i" :: '}l8)i% . '_!Ct,) Levefof S~rvice• -.. Analysis Period (min) 15 r:.t@.~r,~i'i.fgJ§!llE :,-;;_ -:'.:,:: ::· ::::':·. .. . c "" -.I., Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 201 O Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest · · ·a.a ·-c --,--' . __ • ---, .... "C,' Synchro 6 Report Page4 I .1 1· I I I I I I I ·I I I ·t· 11 1. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SE 176th St & SR 515 -I> 1/23/2009 t II/ICl:V.eirienti,;;;~01:·;,i.,;,W.,;E~BT~R1W5M:3IF:i1JivB:t~\JilaR"'i\iiZ~Ns"l1~NB"R~FsB~B'i;~WsBR ~ane_Co~Ag;!fations __ .,,., .... ""i,,..tl+ ..... ___ ........ "!,-····tr. ____ ----··-"!"! ... tl>. _ -----~-.,--fl> _____ _ .Ideal Flow (vphpl)':', . • 1900''::·.1900 · ,1900:'::1900"''1.900•.'' 1900 /'1900'' 1900 1900 1;;1900 1900?,.1900 Total Losttime (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' . ·-· 3.0· 3.0 ....... -. -3.cf-3.0 ·---_, Carie_ Otff' Fa.?§r .. ·. ,-. _ 1 op;,: 0:95 __ , _/,'le J.bo .. · 0,95:,J... _ 0.97/;,._:·0.95 ... ·. _ ' o· 0.97_;;_ O.ff~. ::J Frt 1.00 0.99 . 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 ror~~f.§1~_9.!~i!IK~Yt~f{~''..;~}'.~'.:91.~§i;Sf:§g~i~rr~~iZ£:~1It~§.fff;iif.9~QJt'.j!,;:E~]LQI~~~;t}i;1J:fQEjJ};:1~~3;~fJlQI~§;]~CLS1QZft.ffid Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3533 1752 3406 3433 3381 3467 3548 l=ltPermitted'',·''· · ···o.952 ,{oo•···~.,./\'o.95 ··;1.00.,·' ·."·0~95,, 1:00··.,-,·-,o.95-· 1.oov ·1 Said. Flow (peioi) 1787 3533 1752 3406 3433, 3381 . 3467 3548 Volume(vph)•''.'·, :· . · ·1s5_: .,1255 ,-'.103· 186 .,.6Hf',c.142 · -204 ·· ~92 208• ., 430 '1140·, .·. :.59 , ~-~ ___ ~,. ~ ~-~· ,,.,_,_.~ .-, .•. -·~-·-·• '.;..:;;:_ · .... -L..-'""'-'"" '• ~ ••··-··"··-.•. , '>• --~··;...;...i-,""'-0.--~-r••"·--"· 4,.., .•. _..,.,-~~ .-.~,~. ,,,,.~43 ~-~·-...., __ , -~~-"'··-.I ,. ~~ _ ~ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 AOjf.:FiOW?(Vpt5);7::~;'.:::,::.~~.:i;;~~1F:i~1:1;:m!ff\~1-~39?;;~~:f!:::1·€fW2)5b :·;~1S6'6£?if\?:~.·1·5~3~;~E~T9~!L1{~.-52·9.~~:~~r2~~~:1?:46~2}71'·226r~;~;'.;(;::a~ RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 34 0 0 3 0 Lane Group.Flow (vphj 177. 1456 • .. 0 200 .. 801c' 0 219,\ 719 , . O'.' -462 .. 1286 ·, 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) ~ 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% · · 1% 1% 1% Juin J:yJ)e.:J~l;ttfi:: ·. ·, .· .... ' .. Li,. PiQr·:j·· .. ···::.,, .... ~ .. ·:~'.\'!;"":: --'fo-;::·., ,~ ~ PrOt .:; · _,.--.~ ~.:;1~~~2;;;• > .-.t ... : ·-··.:;~Pr_6f~ ~/ :;.'.·'. ··., _ ·~-·~-_ ... <:,·." _ PrOt < -: ~ ,: ;. -~ ··:;-~;:;.,;, ·;_,. · j Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 P8f'irHtl8CFPha'Se§:·'.~·x,~·1,;i::: ~1;~~~;t:·~~r;·'::· .. ~~-.-~:-~!;r\·:f:lliff~'.T".'1'.'·1.~·'.' ... ,,~.1~~:,·~:,_~::·1:'.&ii,~:_;~·~:·7··::~:·::',::~9S'.WJ{·'.:r:t;:r;:,,-·".~;,:~·-.. :1:;:~~~:·,:;-r,; :::1··~::::·~-~~'.~'.};ftC".;1 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 51.0 12.0 44.9 6.7 32.1 19.3 44.7 EffectiveG/eeh;g(s) .. 20.1·. 53:0 . ·.-.. '14.0 46.9 ". ' · 9.0 34.4 . '· ·-21.6. 47.0.-· . , 1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.39 . 0.10 0.35_ .. 0.07 0.25 . 0.16 0.35 . Cle'arari'c_e ;,T..irffe.:,~{ s) .:. ·. ''~· .... :,::1i)5: Qi;,£ ::;:~ 5. 0:.-.. Y.:·_ ·.>: .. ;,,?~~">'.'. ,p·. Q· .. 15~:. ,5;0.,,~:;N;.::. ~'~-'. .. :· i'_~.: .. ·:i·:5_;~_,:<-~_.:;:;r§:~: ·;, .· .. ·: ·\~i~3n' / ·:s. 3,.,;,.. ,:._ 5:3;\f<'''.' .. '·.: Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 [ifr-A_Av1_!r~91_!,Cpi:it~91Det~:{; __ • _7},7.. _ __ HG_~ ~e111_!l,<>fSeN._ic .. e _ .. _ __ §. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 1c,iu~~J:t,<:;yij1~:~1,jigt!l,(sf~.:·,2~ :: ~ ·: -.. ')3§Ji;: · . ~.u,!1\§fFi~( tiir)_e .<~t:;;;i: ::/.-. :: ·1t q~·· ··_ ·: _ . . ... · :• •··: :. · Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service G 8n.·ij1ysif Pe~oJ:tJniinf'"... _ .i -: _,,,,;1_§ ___ c· ., .... : ... ,.. ·' ~0:i:•::':._: ~;~ :'.~:7'':· c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest · Synchro 6 Report Page 5 I I I I ,, ., I I I ' I ·1 I I I I t I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 192nd St & SR 515 112312009 -<I-t Movemel'.lb:i,;i,l\'.:~:,, :. ~ 1,EBL, .. EBT;.:: •EBRi'•'.WBL c:WBT': · WB~NBL~t-·, ·.NBRc·' ' .. SBL-. •,,SBT ,' SBR L~ne_C?nfigur~tio~~ ••...•.. ,, .. 4 -~--~---·-«·· .+f ......... (_ ..... 1' ..... tf., ............ "i .. t-f+ ...... . )deal,l;low (vRbi>I) ' ,:: ·· ./1.900 ·1900,. 1900-:,1900, 1900 i-1900: ''.1900 ·i1900?, 19002'' 1900• ;,f900 .· 1900 Grade(%) ~ • 0% · ~ 8% -1%. ·-·----1% ·•• - :t9.~~K2!t:~l1)£<~}.;:,,~:~.~::,j~~~'.!ii:L.,·, .. ;~.,}:9;~ .. ~~.~-t.9.:~it).Z: .. ;: ·:. -. ;_/~:-~]1.::~:: .. i&)::~'.;;;~~~ .• 9;sJ1.,:~!.9_:.i.~"· .._, . .-.Q~~~,-~.:.9.0;:.,~..:_9 __ ,._·; .. ~:~,.:;1 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ~rt ·;t, ::._ '7'!;'.f':, ·.· ·§:":;:! ·•1~00· 6.a~i,>•.· '',tQb· · 6.B9•,:t1 do\"'.0.98 ' ·;-/, _1,ob• '0.99 . · ':•J Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.J;low (pJOt)Z,:, .• -· :'ff: .. _1870,;, 1599 ·;···· ,, , ' .. 17z5 __ )520 :;:"t7?8 . '3<186. · .. , .. · _i/1796 : 3!j61 •.... /'.I Flt Permitted · 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 saiff;'.i'1D,ii1eermP:··:.· :::;::• .. ,,, ::·•1ato:·: issiF•:;-:·-:· ·•:c:r112s•7'1 s2ci1,:,;;-;11a':"'34stf;· · .. ":'·:·••1·tga)~3sa 1--•·· ,,·i Volume (vph) 37 283 101 145 54 103 36 560 86 223 875 54 Peak''nout. factgr;~,Bi·if·.r,Q:84 1.I0:84:, .' 0.84)('~0.86 .,,0.82, '0.86;JIJ-0.93; J;,0.93--.-0,93/'.'0.90 •'',0.90: .. ,0,9(! Adj. Flow (vph) 44 337 120 169 63 120 39 602 92 248 972 60 RToR ReduciioW<viliir·7,70 ·:·, ~:a :-· s3·• ; ':" a· ·:-;:a.,, ·,rirz,,,··o·"\;;;1r ... : 'er:_···· o -,,··4 · --,a Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 381 67 0 232 42 39 683 0 248 1028 0 HeaW,5leRic1es·(oJ.f "\_ ,·_;;j,::1% ·. · ~ 1w~:i .. ;1 °1o:·::~.:2oJ. ,:.2°id,:.:· 2"il' ·_:,:,1?Jo·::-;c:1 oJo ~-._·. :10Jo~:1·<;1%"Y£F:1%'.,,:: :1% Turn Type Split pm+ov Split pm+ov Prot Prot :~~~~=~ :~:::: ... _ 4 ·_ '. 4 . • _'~S. __ 8 " . 8 __ ·. ~--:_ 5_. · :2 •.. : f;. 1_, . 6 . j Acf@leci;~fe~rW G -(s>::.:r,:s ,:,. ~ )e~z::"; ~2_:i;;:;:;; ' Ii!if~:: ~~s~3~~9:5'7~9;i :;:: :,'<c . .t-Zf5:9:.;:)1f.6:·;. ;,:;;4"; Effective Green, g (s) 27.8 35.8 21.3 38.7 8.0 31.5 17.4 40.9 Actuated g/C Ratio ' _-1~,' · J):2~ . 0.33 °.;' · '. 0:-19 • 0.35~1'.0.07' .·o:29 ., > .:: . 0.16J.37. · / Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 veliicle'Exiensio·n·(s). ~--_'1F' .: · ... :· :,:Eo-:::----:fs,1-.,.:r. ·, ·;;·: ::n>'.;:·. 2:s'f,c:.:,. :.3.si :•?•ro··: ··· -.~::·-• :-2:5c"n1:o ~.,.,." \ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 473 520 334 576 129 998 284 1324 vis Ratio'Proc:,:_ ··_ · ~-... · cci',20· · o~of _ ... · • · "ccf1:f ·o.ch"7b.oi -~ 0::10·· · · ·",:: co: 14:, co.20 vis Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02 ~!P}$1i.~.9~~',;i:;;,\:;i;;:r_.:~'.;.:\:~:·,.Jdit~:L.:::~·;,£t~f:r~::;:9Lt~:· :~.1&:::.~'.:::'~~~:]L~.~,,;;·~Q"J.Q'ti~~q~:-~·-g:~.:~s.Q;§I;~::: :~:;J:~\:.:~~:.Q:iz·:::~·9.;z~-~-:· -·-1 Uniform Delay, d1 38.6 26.1 41.3 23.7 48.4 34.8 45.2 30.5 Progiessi6n-Fa·ao'r_ .. _ .... ·' ·-.... njci .. Tcib --, .. . . -~f,cici ·_ ·1.olF'1 .'oo"''i~OC> ... ·: ':"'-1.ob' 'fotf -. · __ Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 0.1 6.4 0.0 1.6 3.8 24.1 4.5 .P,~1~V)ij)~'.,~rz:;;~;t~~;;; .. :.~;f;:~·/~_;tci1:ti1~;;~:::.;;r.1:@ .. ~z~.r:L?§;.?~\';~~{~it1::t:~·::.t._.:1itt:'.~-~?~~.1:~:;~1.~~$.:.:·~:I~~,.t:1;_ ... :~;:·,·:::.~n:;.r~;.:~.-§~::1;:;;,~.tf::.:~::;:.J;?;:;1 Level of Service D C D C D D E D Apliroacli'Delay(s) 43'3.. .. .. .. ·:--39~5 .. ,. ;--·.' 39.3 •. .. -. . -~41.7 Approach LO-s. -_, .. -~ ·o ..... -·--< ···~--o ·-· .... ... ··---·o ... ------·· .~ ·--·--o~ ,. ·~ ..... / Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/2212009 2010 Wrthout Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page6 I I ., I I I ' I I ·a 'I I I . I ., I I I 11 ' I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW 43rd ST. & SR 167 NB on ramp -I> 1/23/2009 <>- Movemenl',~'tJiii;,,,,}Wk1,~1'!EB~EBT~EEf~WBL~Waf.l".:'WBR"'"'NElC"~'ll"F,l"B'f"""NBR:·~sBiP~s'rr.ssR LaneCo~~gura!io~s ..• , .••.. 'l ... Jt . .. . ... . . ·-· tt . __ .ff. _ 1'L ...... <f ___ ."f'. · _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ __. ldealFlcivv(VRhf)I) .. "' ._ ,. 1900i 1900. 1900 1900 •1900. 1900i 1900i 1900 ;.19_00 '"1900 "fgoo·,, 1900 Total Lost iime (sr _, 3.0 . 3.0 -·-----, . •. -3.0 -• 3.0 ..• 3.0 .• --·3.0·· ,.,_3_0 ,., ............ _. ........... . . Qrri_e}J.!it!tF.ti£la9.[: , ~-• ;;;,,, :.,1-QQ.c:~ •• f ~? ,.,..... ii',,,;. , .,, ,'..c,,2'Q~~-),,g_o_;;;.Q,~? '.ic,fi,g_~,. _;;;;..t 92.. ' ~}:· . ;;;,::.E~:I Fr! 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 ~1~ prote_ctedrg:.-'·:/,~;;1/~ ..,,-r,¥,:,!.."· .•· 0;95:;~·'.·:.,1~0Qi~~,··. :_~ ~~~'1t_i!Jf,4:~-/,,,,._~·. ·:·· /.~}I ·.OO't;b:.1.QO"f?:1-:\ 0: 951'-~-. bl$~'·,~~,'._ 1,~00· ,, ~,:· . --~ "f,_.w :·f:,!fl_,;II,_' .. ,;~_,,._\' -·~:--,-.• 1 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 3539 3539 1583 1665 1669 1568 Flt Permitted•.:,:·-·-:·":-''0_95': '1.00' --,,~,. ' -.-·' ·'. 1,00 '. 1.00 .. 0,95 .• 0,95 ···1.00. •· . · ... -·< " '! Said. Flow (perm) · 1770 3539 " 3539 1583 1665 ~ 1669 1568 · · · · · -·- )/gl_uri)eJvph);:,, .~;;,, · .. ;·~·~,:35a.'.; 219\,; ;,• },0 _:,",,1,;0 .),19§i, ,;;~74;.,,.320 Y°dc. .. ft) •. -H .. 40,1,.'; ;.o_s ,_;· ;O•;( J:,0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~clf(i;low7(vf?h),.:.:;}C,117~,3-86ic235S';";" ;-;;,o·,,,;;:::;o ;;:1300 ;;::rsfs· ···-~395:;i;·_:fr,.~, 499 _ .. , .. ' -o,;,r,r•: · 01:•• ··,r o RTOR Reduction(;ph) , 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 . -0--.• 5 ·--0 ---0 . 0 Eaiieu"roi.iiil=1ow'(viilii' · ·3ail,;2:isil:Z ·····o· ;:: "-b~1:ioo--:: '2§4'''T91f·: · 1ilif' ··4s,r · ' · a~· : o · ·· _ ·o Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2%~ 2% 2% [ufri,.Type·-.,-~j .· __ .... ,,,;: .. ,' ',"~ ..... ·--~rot,,_,,.,.,. .. ~ . .-... -· .... :.,~·t\ .. ,,~;:.:~. · .. --~--'. .. (1.1<.-: .. , .. A,::)~ern1s: P8f.!O .. 1~~->.:~1/ _,., .. ,-~erlll ":;.}i:.' ,1.'};.. ~·,1.' /,,,>C.:;1,' ~ Protected Phases 5 2 6 4 P.8rmittedil?has8S; ....... i·J,1~.1i?;/;,.1 .• Ji-··:,-··-:;;r1><:1:· · .. , ·;>:;Ji;·,.-.·r:1, % :·<,,"1,·~_;,j.;,, ·. ,,< :_:6:::. <-'.t4 ·-'h:~~',·''ii{ .. :-,:,.;/" ... ."4.·I'.:\;·-. .,· ___ · -· .,. ; ~ Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 86.0 54.0 54.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 _Effecfive·GFeefi":"if'(sj''f ::zifo".''iaa:o;;,r ·•sKo'li·',sil:o,"""41~0,r, 4'1''b'"'",n:o'··y··-", .. _ ·--··-,· -,--• · Actuated g/C Ratio _ 0.21 0.65 _ _ 0_41 _ 0.41 0.30 ~ 0.30 0.30 _ _ _ -.. --- g1earanceTimeJs) .·:,: _'-5,0 1 _ 5.o.·. ·;' _ .... : .. • ·, 5.0 .... 5,6 ... _.5.0_,~ .5.0_/ S.O. · ...... )-,;_'. , ... ; ..... , Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan~,£,rpCap{vph) __ ,;: , ... 380, _2307--.· .0 ,.;:, ,•v. , ~i, .• 1~8, .·, }'?.5.?i :'· _5CJ6, .. !;0? • ,.47~ .. {. •·-< ,.,, y.... l vis Ratio Pro! 0.22 c0.67 0.37 ~/s~atio.}'erm·•;; TZ:: :zr:''?tti, :., ·. -·~· .. ·· ···'L:'o'.19S :o._12 'l"'d:12 ··:co:·32' v/c Ratio 1.02 1.02 · -6."il9 "6~45 · Cl.39 · 0.39 · '"f:04 i PB~ormo~l~y::ajt '. :·s:;i:9?·~:f5 i :·. _· ··315:_s : _2a4:~,~-7,1 ?~tJ. ~: 4't:o· , ..• ~::.:. ·----. -: -·, Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 · 1.00 fnciementaJ beiay~d2 ·.-}0.2::.-2{3·. ;,: . .. ... §·.2__ _2.;2:, .. : _o.1.: .• <Lz. · ~.1Ai ....... :·'---_ Delay (s) 103.2 47.8 44.7 30.6 37.8 37.8 98.5 ~,~Y:~L~!::~if"Y.l~_._:{£/l;_;_,jfj;;:.~:~~f:fii'.'.1.'.),::~f];'_::r __ .. ;-,:,, ~-'.'"~·i.7:~ .:;:. :.:~~,{.:~;x~'.l?~i~:-··!~ :···GJ{ ., :·.10:·:Q:::/;~ ·;LP . .:.· {'.J:.:::,·r. -.-~ ~ ;_::;::·~'~·:_~= ··. --~ir··; Approach Delay (s) 55.6 40.7 71.6 0.0 Ai?P~oacti.C.9.$.Z"'"' :.:::····, E''. ...... ::·?~-~-·o::·_ .. ,:-··::::·, .. : ::.1:·:,·· ·-,-··: · .·.:··p;_~ 1mersectiOOSumm'a7:Y:1i1vfFif~~~?~1·.~~c~F,.r_ .. : -~·~~p~:~:-;;~~::;:-~"'-7~: :: ~'11_ ~:~,;~·771 t:'flln, t,y~r\19!.' .. c.9.on.tro!;Cle[ay .: , .. < _ ,5_3} __ .·.'HC.r.t1 LeyE!lpf ~E!rv_ic:e\: · :< .. " ,. D , -_ :°£,. '( i !. · _ ., _ . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Acfualeci.cyc1e·t:eri 9lfi'.isl' : .. ,,.-, .. 1:is:o '"'' "4 Sum 011asi'tfme'(sl.-·,·-· .... ·1s:o· ··· ,., ,-" ·, .. ,.---'' Intersection c·apacity Utilization. • -92.2% .. . --ICU Level oi Service .. . . .... -i= ----------· Analysis F>~ii<il/_ <i!iinJ ·: · · • 15 . : ~-•--· -_ . . -~ .. _ , _ . _ __ . c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 201 O Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I V I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency /Co. : TENW Date Performed: 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #8 -SE 172nd St/108th Ave SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Without Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: 108th Ave SE (Benson Rd S) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~V.ehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Volume Approach Movement L 43 0.93 46 1 T 333 0.93 358 Undivided 0 1 LTR Yes Westbound 7 L 10 0.93 10 0 8 T 1 0. 93 1 0 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0 Lanes 1 Configuration LTR 0 0 R 8 0.93 8 9 R 5 0.93 5 0 No 4 5 6 L T R 10 358 17 0.93 0.93 0.93 10 384 18 1 I 0 1 0 LTR No Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 34 2 36 0.93 0.93 0. 93 36 2 38 0 0 0 0 I No I 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Approach NB Queue SB Length, and Level of Westbound Service~~~~~~~~~~ Eastbound Movement 1 Lane Config LTR V (vph) 46 C(m) (vph) 1162 vie 0.04 95% queue length 0.12 Control Delay 8.2 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS 4 LTR 10 1198 0.01 0.03 8.0 A 7 8 9 LTR 16 303 0.05 0.17 17.5 C 17.5 C 10 11 LTR 76 373 0.20 0.75 17.1 C 17.1 C 12 I I I I I I I I I I ' I ,, I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency /Co. : Date Performed: TENW 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #9-108th Ave SE&108th Way SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Without Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: 108th Way SE/Project Site Dr North/South Street: 108th Ave SE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments~~~~~~~~~~~~~­ Northbound Movement 1 2 3 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage }:T Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? L T 352 0.90 391 Undivided 1 0 TR Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound Volume 7 L 5 0.90 5 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0 Lanes Configuration 8 T 0 0 LR R 5 0.90 5 9 R 33 0.90 36 2 No Southbound 4 5 6 L T R 8 395 0.90 0.90 8 438 2 I 0 1 LT No Eastbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 I I ~~~~~~~~~-Delay, Approach NB Queue SB 4 LT Length, and Level of Westbound Service =E_a_s_t~b_o_u_n_d~----- Movement 1 Lane Config V (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 8 1163 0.01 0.02 8.1 A 7 8 9 LR 41 585 0.07 0.23 11. 6 B 11. 6 B 10 11 12 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Grady Wy & SR 515 1/23/2009 vo1ume.(v)lhJc,,,1r,·.,~,,, e'i ,/'.62, .. ,;,1,12., ,,.664;,,,;, 324'. ,,,489;. ', 46 .;.,: 387. · 33J ,· 282·. " s5 ·,· s29 >. · 39 ~-~-... --.,,..._., ~· •.•• ,, .... , ... ~ ..... --,!, ·"". , .•• ~i:.:.-; ••• ~-·, ... =-···· .... ;.,-,; ~"" ·"~~ ... mt:.~, ... ~·-··-··''"'"··t-~-,,~~,..;,ii;:,,.-,;i,.;,.,. __ ,,,,, .. ~.,~-~~--,~-~,,-1,,,, .. ~~ .............. "~~---·~---~~------~-.~-~-,·--~ ... ,~.,-.--~--~----"~' Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 A:af J=foW:(vi)fi5'.7·,·,·:"'.7'',?'.lllf"'."~1~2'"~Ct30 ~:':)$T'.:?Jst"·r,'4t·,;;;.,43s",,'"3t2,···:,,;311~~ ?:':''BtFF ~:l"'ss'i 17'' 742 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 196 0 6 0 O 121 O O 6 O lane'Group:Flow (il!}h}),,;:68i•,~·i:782 ';>534 ·.,, .,331/'•,;.540:"'.L ,0·,,4,,435 \y,5613},. :o.LO'. ';i.,PP .i&t ,720 ;.,,,,/, 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% [~lh.!Y~&~:&.\1;;1/l~:~~'~;:· . .;,,,.t~ .• ;t~r.Qh ... LL .... ;;);;,, .. ,,:e~tfif."~.~; .. ,~~r.9h:.j,.,t: .. :.L;_·:~"~(,: .!,: .. ~::·. ~tQJit~~:~~.}~.~ .. ::~:.:~L.·.~:f.rQ(~::~.t::j~,,_.:;~:_:·J Protected Phases 2 6 5 1 3 8 7 4 Pe'rffiitte'd:PtjaS8s: ;:. :/· .. '.''.~'!'', ;_• '. '{··· ~ ~:;"I!'~~ ' "'"··:· :a{~I; '·~t;::·" i,.,:.,:'',H°>7'.,:-'lf~ ,.,j.<1 ",):;,t j,.'l;~' ,;~·./,!1~~1.:~'l"i·'i· ~:'~' .r~11,-·~cp,;::-,.,;,,,1%i!'.:1, ,,,,' + 1: ~•'.'.(!,_,;,z£~r, I':'t~:· '.i·~:;.··!~y.~,;·, ?r,,· :•J Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 43.4 43.4 16.5 . 49.3 . 17.8 34.9 . . . . 8.2 23.3 Effjctivei'."Green;i,g~(s)·.;, .J,1 ,6·; .~44,;4,,,'dl4':1J,,, 18,,~-i/ ,,51 ·~d ,: :¥ ,,,\,,19,8 i;.: 35.9:C:..,< ·,,··· ..... ,·,., 9.2,,,:;~2§.3 .. · ·,. ""' j Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.15 0.43 0.17 0.30 0.08 0.21 P.1earance.·T~rrie ·cs);· .. _ ., ~ ,:~::·f _5.o,,: "{'·· ~'."tf::~·,itt 4'.d,·,', 1.s:ct~ .. "':, "'S:o:·1 ~ \. ·: .. __ r_··, !."~'·W~rs:o. '·_/:·---·~·41 • tjf ·::' 1_··· ;,-'~-,, _·· -~•t:~~{jyJ-::,·: 5~0;f ".3'!;·., '_'1 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 i:ane'"~ip'Cap"(vptif" ·. • •1,·'~1,;p; · 1309\:,;,· 'Ji86,;:::'vs24,6i1.1419 . :? :::·'·""• 5§6 1,·· .• ,986":;,,l.;, '·'"'·. ,.,131, ,,,,.1 on· .... ,,.:. ,,··.! vis Ratio Prot 0.04 0.22 c0.10 0.16 c0.13 0.17 0.03 c0.14 rmersecHoosummary:~T!·. ' {\ .. /T.~~~-~,~r:;ir:-~~~~~·~·1 ... ·::~· ;· *' .. ~'· .. "\-~~:1-·-iP.:~*f ';·,!' .. ,··:}]~_~·µ), 1. ·¥;·,;'··N ):lc;:"'1,:'~~ilr,age <;:p6ttq!Jl_e)~Y. ·:~· ,, : : -~9.~ ··~· ~·~ ,,, r1c;r,Lt_eVE1IAf i:lervj~e· ·,, .' L .·· ~ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0. 78 Acfuaie<(c%1e,Cen9111:(s), 7: ;r. :,;. ~' 120:0,· :,: ·;:~umo1JosttiinE1 (~>.· ·: .. ·:·· >·.-... ·.1.2 .. ,1f : .. ,, ... ,., .... · .. · •..• -.. ::,:L.~; Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysfsi?iiiiod(min( ='.: -: .... · -··· 'Ts' -" . ,. '"' , _ ... c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: S 15th St & SR 515 --1/23/2009 t Movement;;"'i'J7""",;r-.: :'. ·E-Ef~·1:0t;,nl:§R7'WBi.';::'""Wl3f"f:WSR...,.~NB[c'l"NBi'~EIR~ss~sf~sSR Lan,ecorlAgurati~s ___ "i ___ f. ·--·------<f __ flf ____ "j ____ tt> .. _. ______ ''i. . .fto~- ideal F.Jpw (yp!:jpl)i,·.,.,j;,,,J900,H19,PQ1, \900«i19,00/,,;1900,,.-, 1900,;tJ 900.£1900,, ;1900 ,:1900, ~.19.0Q, ,190,(! Grade(%) 0% -5% 7% -7% trOfa'i .... tCrSftlrnf(Sf:~~-;~:.::~:"" 11-~::,ifc['?~·{Cfs1::·.:;.f:·-:1?2::71/~:-nr~~~l::f14':'(~ff .·.r::'7~flf1~;\·74--: o:sp~4w;::::;p .. ·~~ ',i-.,'.;%~~:c,~:;J(3Jf.~;3;7'·-:::;11 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 Frt;;,. ,,}-,,~~,;,__ ~ ,, ~;,· '" ,foo..i:.'.. o.9_4 . .:/ .•. ' .. : ~ , f'oo' . 0.85:;~~~1.ob :"'o'.99 1'. ,.1.. · ·· .. ·'-1,00"':o.99 · .. ;~· ':j Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ,SO:.td. flowJpJOt)1A~~s1\.t?~6,, ,.,:1~1J,,, .,,,, .:: ;·_. , ,,,, .. ,/;,,.,1!!,36:-,.,2856),:J?:08,:)'.338,~ --~ -•:• ;-;1683~;;:;352~----i;,,':,) Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 sat8: Flow1perm)'.""···" "173sc:·111.7'·"·'.;-', " ---'.·• '.' .'.i,71458':·"·2e5s>:;' 1708'.:_,3387:·",,, ',,•· ··-:_1683~ : 3521.·, ,;;:,. {I Volume (vph) 51 5 3 20 5 249 3 616 37 362 1335 58 R.e.§.1~~-~}l!J.faf~g!pr.,·,.Bt-JF~,;,, .Q,,z@; ,: .9I§" ;,Q,l\S~C.c9;~§L; Q,?lt~;,._ojl6,;'J;.~g,!!4,,""g'~t!."i1::9,~ ,.:~fL~.'.1~.~·,g,~'.::::.Q,~1 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 6 4 23 6 290 3 655 39 385 1420 62 RTOF(Reauctioh'Fi'ifif . ,·;r:"::,r,· ,,,;:.•3,,. ··q;'.':o~··.: :,,,,·o;ro,,;g:·o·::··;;5scff';'' ,'~o;-C:,:;fj,;_;c ,i,iO,.'T' "''O ' :;;;.: f2<:i};,:;:,,o Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 7 O O 29 21 O 3 690 o 385 1480 O Heavy \iehicl'es'·(o/oj-;·: ·:·4%·.·;,,:<i•i.: .·.'..4o/o··•· '2%" ··2°i~; ·: -2%·:·· ·.2o/og•·•·2%· :: 2%·.,, 1o;.;c-;·:·1w·•7'1%1 Tum Type Pro! Perm . pm+ov Split Split Pr'Ot8cied· Phasest:~·1 ·,, ·;···£~ii!. ·1:.~·\ 11 ,·· :'~;1::~i::,;_, ··,)B,'.'_. -··.<1f°::1.1._ .~\~ J~;\_<-.. ,:S::!.·· 1t~!:,_ ·-3~'·:·,...! ~:· ·•2,.tt,~_?:\'.~''.i-1,t::':( r at~·:.1-·f; .-_1',i·'·fi::·: ·· ::, ;.~ · .,~2,,~ ... 1+ -.'. ~~:2 ~,·~,;,~: . .a.iJ Permitted Phases 3 3 Aiiiuaiea·c;,eei{ c;·cs>,'"' ·:"-6'4:'' ·11 s: 1"''"':' .,. :·::· "''.' ·'" ·: ·,··x4. 1" •· '64'.1' ''"3'1'.it'' 3't:·s·,·, · ::-:;· .• ,,,"' 59'4' ·i••s9'<E'tff . Effective Green, g (s) 's.4 15.1' 4.7 .. 65.1 32.5-32.5,. · · ·-·60::i' 60 . .r·-· ActuafecfliLc;Ratig,.;,;;:_:~rcr®:.:.;o:) i-~, .. ; ,,/;:,;;: .·.· ~ .. -a1.04,;:.;:p,54x':J1:-21.; t·o:2.1-:··•. ~:· ::;;·o:so-·:""o:scc:: ··· :: Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle'Exferision (s)'( 1:,t· 3.0 ,,,,,,,3:d .. , .. ,•'::., , ",J 11, .. ,·:·;1-><3.0;/ ',·74'0;1,,,,\i, 5;0,,;:;,;,,-,5_0; .,,,,,,;: /,,; ., ·4:0>::''•:. 4':0 ,, .. :, :.,, , Lane Grp Cap (vph) 93 216 57 1549 463 917 847 1772 yrs·R<!!io:i:fri?tF .. :~ -., .•. ~_-co:0<1 ;_:q:oo ::.~: .... .... . · ... 1•· '':, •• 0,07( ·o"o,o' c<f:io ~,., .. "' .,, clc':i3":'co:<f:i"' ._,.. ·:n vis Ratio Perm c0.02 0.01 ~!§ R}@cl~:'2:?'._{,_ : .co:15:;-:\0:03 _;. · ,_-:_;.~9~5.'fa,::~g~t'\1::0;01,~;~Q,I?:;:,. ,::;· ": 6--'il? ~'.:2~~1:r.:.,;:;;:; l\niform Delay, d1 55.9 46.0 56.5 13.6 32.0 40. 1 19.2 25.5 Pia9ressioff~aaor·,;·. ··roo·· Joo . .,,,:'''"'.'." ,. ·: ,-_·1.00 1' .. '1~00;_ ''1:oar·"r.00'··'' "" · ,,,. (ills ;0'0:i''"-vi Incremental Delay, d2 20.5 0.1 7.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 1.2 3.3 belay,;@;:,,,:, ,:~,,:;,.,,,~:;:''. /· .7a:3c_:,:46~f. ::c.:,:;., .. , :;,·_, : ''.63~5~ :J3.6i';,, 3,?.6,: .. 44::J;,.,·······:. -:-:::,1 a.o:-:2a~9:,-·'-:::.; Level of Service E D E B C D B C A1iiiroacnoe1ay (s)"•-r '~ ,,,· · "12;3 · ,;,,; :;o-·· '•1K1;; , ·-·' :;i~:,,~J:i-i:·, ,Z,J ,. : ~0-2_5J:,J .. _.:,;.: fi.pproacti'Los ---.. ··· · ... E--s D c HCM Average Control Delay 30.0 HCM Level of Service C tj~rVEY~gf!ljD§~~!JJi~91~Y}~~!~'.·~:'\ ·'.~~~'!,\'5::~~~.q·~ t~~·~:·~ .... •::·.~ ·,:~·, ~~~'. ''.·;:·:1 ' • · 1Jt_1~i:·~i':~ ~\·:i:~~T··;j:~·:· .... ~:·~ .. ·~~~~:~: .. :~~·:·'-.. / _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 iniersecticin,§apacity'li~ilizatioi, ,. -·. 74~8% -· .. ·: ICU Level'df Servi90,,·' . . • ... · '. ·o--:·· :,, .... ' Analysis Period (min) 15 ;r·cr11ica1t:aneGroupc:,'.,. ,,,,... ·· ·,:: .. -,· "'·'······ .. ,,,, .. L,.,,.,." Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 201 O With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 21 St. & SR 515 -1/23/2009 Md)lemeht};,:.-J,:, .,;:,, :':'.'"l,;EB!l,,.: EST.::;,: EBR' ;,WBl:,;, WBT ·.1WBR;i;lii§['7""JrBJ\~NBR,.' :SBL :'!1.SBT:"'sllR La,ne Co!1.~g~_ratio~~. ""'' . "i . _ k ..... _ _ ... .. . 4>~-. . ,J .. 11. .i:lo .. ;-. ., ..... 'l~ .. if. ..... _ Ld~!J1.':12¥J.1.<YP.llP.!l.1~,c,,11iI1,rn!l.Q:,,;::!.~.9.9.J,.,W_QQ;u .. l9.!!.9.m;,..!gQ.Q,JJ).9QQ,;,&1 gQQ,,.,Jll,QQ1;;,t1~.QQ;'";Jgg_~~J.9,9Q,,,:W..Q9. Grade(%) 0% 0% -3% 3% [9!iLgO.JJ.~!im~~;(§},f1.1·!-:,~~~'~~1~~1..~~T.g7;t;'.'.i~9.l~t:·~:·~~1t:::;:'Z::~·~·.''..'.~~2~\~~·.'~'.!!2?i:ti::;1iJ'.~Q;:;!:.ilQ;:ll,:.~:,,,~:~'.'.:.;~.d;~}:i:.;:i:t1~;~ t~Qj:~ .... ~;;.R'.JJ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 l=rt,:~f.~·,·~~¥;~¢:./£:1{:~ .. <~,1.~··. ~ii-::§{·f~po:·::.,:o.85it~,; ,· ·,. :1~,:: .. j!'~1/Jl •·/Jt·:-'.~1"11:··~·Jl:.,1:~ ,i.6f~~·-_,,,;,0~2FJ!:;oo~. ·;1~1·1:00·,;fll<:.,.·>~f::-· ~}Aif!_.,~· :k~~~ OA7·~ ·.-.,_:;~:t .1.'.",1 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 .~:>'atdr!:JoV~,'.{(p'rOt).' . ·1!'1· ,: .. JLi\ 17-70;"·'.'. j}83·1,·.!t'··: :· '}-~c.;'.·; ::J,~(.t ' .•. · ·.'~ .~ ,·,:<:' ·::·~ -~''.,::· ;:1}·~1t:: '17:>1796 -'1) ¥3592·:-.;~,1~ •'' -::":,iX·,'· ·:4:?i.:•: ~>, @:' 3392 '-··~-~1;"!~' i .. ~ Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 SitOrFioW""(J)8i'infir:~'"r?tl'fitd''::··:\:f58J"i:t;,;'.: 1:·::"'.)t.;·;::r,1~F1W·~f.':'.;rr~-~;~r;_;:··:~':fr/':·· .. 1~7;t':~~::a·~:~(~1'1.7§6~;·:~:·3592~;01···::·~11~;~~"?·:7:z~,~~¥?r3392~s); ·t:i;~'.~?~.:1 Volume (vph) 319 0 81 0 0 0 30 470 O o 1263 247 Peak:liouFtacior,'PHF;,,;·o·etf'''.}~6·0,~"o:i5···::To6'.T'1'.61:i:'':Ta·o,·w··o:s4':·,·:'o~lio:'1''''f':oo'·,,roo:?~7 o'.'g;F?:Cj'.a2 Adj. Flow(vph) . , 354 . 0 108 .. 0 .. 0 . 0~ 56 .. 522 . 0 0 1373 301 RTOR Reduction'(vph) '?'o ··.79·; ·· .. 0 ,. 'a O ' ".O. :' Q'.·'.• '"O .. ' '· 0 ' · ·o· '-" 0° '. 12 ,·, 'ci Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 29 o· 0 0 0 56 522 O O 1662 . O [umTy~ .. : ... i ....... ··.'. /_Split.;0 .,': •. ' .... Perm: ......... · ... :;:·Prot·<_,_.:::,_:, ... 'Prot'··.··-:c ... ' . .J Protected Phases 4 4 3 1 6 5 2 P~r(nitted;~hases_":: .... _ ~~-~~· L:' .· ... --·') .· ..... -:/·,"' " .. -. :.~ , ·_.;.,< .. 3:..----. , a.= "~--~-·,-., > .. ~-.:~.; -· -; _ _ .~~. ·--·· ·-·-· · ... : .. ~."-~~-~.~---/~·-~ .' . ! Actuated Green, G (s) 23.2 23.2 8.2 49.0 45.3 ~~~~:~d~;6"~;o<sLn.~~~~ ·~i~· .... {. '. ..... · .. ·· .. ~'. ·· ... · .. · . ·0 91~··, ;~~.: · .. < .. ' .. _;,_ 6'.s; .. ·-: .. .J p1earprl@:l:_irrle( s)"7··_ ... 1 • .,;,\i:-",~to~. ;<i }-A~Qt,,:'.,,~. : .. :;:-:· _. ·::_ ·\,, ... -: ,···L .:.!, ·1 ·> ~: .,.;, .. --~ ·,). :~Z ~, .. -~Jo.;,.,.-);,. 5.:.0 ·:~ .... , ~.~X. : . ..: .... iu/: ·· .. _,..·.,.:s~. 5~0 ·~ ._.,:': . ._ _ _J Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 ..... ~~'..:y;,:p:;,,~iF".7F::i:70~'.:·~~-~·,~f/1bJ11::;W:.:,l :fA-~4".:"\':-~-.::~~~---:< ·,,;_:~;., -~:··_ ~:QJ:·,-2 :-§~rt-;,~~,;;~:: ·:,c'.; 0.0 12.7 29.0 "'\'A_'. -~t~'. ·.:··~~t' '.'",""ii'~:~;;·.' .. r:;-c·· .. :' -__ _ Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 108th Ave SE (Benson Rd S) & SR 515 t ,, . ..,, .. ,,, Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest _.. . -. ' ' I • • • 1/23/2009 ;;,::::i Synchro 6 Report Page4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SE 176th St & SR 515 -1/23/2009 t Movernent.,,S,;· ,;~,; , ,;:c;'.;.'EE!Gi:1itJi:1:BR°"JiivB1!. · wst:: WB~~l'IB'~~B~~BR Lane Configurations .· . "i •· tl>. . . .... "i . tl> ... ··. "i"i tl> . . . . "i"i . tt> Ideal Flo'iYJvphpl);L, ','"" ·,, 190Q',·11C11900 ei1,0 9001 ,,190.Q.y,;1,9001i ·' 1900 ,;::1. 9001; ~qQ;;;:1,900;~ 1.fil).Q.•,)::£190Q.,t,,1.90q Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _[ai,0/'DHe··J=aaorr'·'.''f.''::P' -~_''fOb~}~·.-·oJjs·~i:;•"'1''•:rr":~~·,::TrcfD'~'.'~~]l9'!,~-i/"';·1:?~1t:::·\r~?'l':~tf97~go·:95;'i'{':'.·~Tz~r:-· 'Q';g7 pp~·95·~r'.i,;:;,: '~ Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 flt P!:_otected;." /;<. ,. -.q~95, .1.00;_ ,;;_ • ' 6.95. s1.oo , , . "', · o.95_:_.;' 1.00,. ' . ,~ cf95·', _ 1'00-;F '': Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3533 1752 3403 3433 3383 3467 3539 l;'lt P,ermitted;,),:u,.· •. :,. ,} •. 0:95"._xoo,};,. :,v , ::,,0:~5_,:,:;1,00;, .Lc,,,~i;L 0,95 , :"·1.00.,, .. ·.'. , 0,95' .1.00 ', ' .... , I Said, Flow (perm) 1787 3533 1752 3403 3433 3383 3467 3539 ~ume(vJ>hJ;'', ... ," .. '' -•. ":.·.· '\! 82<'1255,, ··,.103 ··::,,, 186"'-'f61e ,,; -':148"1'± -204;-&498 .,,:, 208, · J,37,.;2 1147 ::.,;:, ·-8~ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 J\dLFlow(vpti)_ : _' ,·-,196_ 1~49, · 111·_ 1 200 }662" ''159} 219 _ ·''53~ ,:_'224"_1···410;•:~1233·,1" 87, RTOR Reduction (vph) O 4 0 0 15 O O 34 O O 4 O Laiie, Gro,up/iow)vptiL ;;1iley ,: f-<1s,5~ : ... , :;-o :/: 2oq:.~,:1{01,;-·~·,·o· ~ :·z-19·7·12s :·· · o· · ·,ito;:~ ):l'ief'" _ ~6 HeavyVehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% ;f l,frri''tTYP~·:;,.~1;:, :~·~V·~f;;'l\· i,(kt; :>,1i.·Rr0t•i':i~·{\i,<,'·· ~if'!i, <:-'.,<':"/\'. /.'•~%L 1r~ot:,.,.:,_;;0·;1,,:'/.,,:, ·:.: ... '_'/;' ''',.,{.,-,;,.~P,r,pt-: .• , :-._· ',1,,.,;.f0,;t~-~;-. ~--,:~~:~,?I-ii:"''. ~rot-;.;,,L~-,j~-, ,.' ii/ .. ~.,>.. ~1.· ... _: Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 p_ej~-i~~-fb~.!~~-~-: :'·"~. "' ,~, .. ~ :1~:· : .. ··_·· :~>-, ~-~·-__ ~~'-_ <\~<, ;:·~~' ."' '~-,:·~,--_ ~;}·: -~·1 ··L~: _ .. ;'':-.-,, ,._i;nr;s:. ,, _·":}._ ,.:-_)• --~::1, .•· , .'<'.';~_, .. -;;': ··:·.:' ...• ·i:~:i~: : . ~:~~:-.. ;:~2\~ Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 51.0 ..... 12.0 44.0 .. . .. 6.7 32.1 ... ·.·· .. 19.3 . 44.7 Effective'Gieen,'9-<sr· .. -· 2fo~··-s3:a·:.·-··:··· ·,··1<1:o·.·~4s:o· ,--·-··,,···,g:o;:···s,f'4·,·,· · · -2rs ·;··4t:o~'';i : Actuated g/C Ratio . 0.16 0.39 . .. . 0.10 0.34 . . 0.07 0.25 . . . 0.16 0.35 9earanc~;TJme,,(s), ,,, ,'.,:,,.5.o; .. 1,0.,5.0"";,,,.;_,,, ';,,5,0 .. ,,, 5.Q', .. , __ ,;._'; .... ,5.3) .,5.3 _, . > . ____ -,5.3: ... _·5,3 :_... ' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 fnteriecUOn!Sum'ma~~~~~~~·~~:T~, .t<:'t;,J,~.,,;{;:,. ~/ iitn' ")/li»i ;'_}ifi:::if:,'f;~:::~ ,.,. ":.~,;_,~"~' ,.''J:~:,._;•,:;[,td'' ~w.r1 ~ •.. i'.s,':3J f:IC::.~ AY,Elr~ge, f<:>_n~(QI DEl~<JYL ,,i'', .. 75.2 :. ·· ... , +l~l',/IJE!,VEl!,~f.l'l~!:"]CEal,,,,:, ·'· ,.'. E., .. : , , •. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 '.h:cfuated'c:ycie'.C:en9tfr<sf''·::, ·. :·.7:·?, c:· 1:is:a:: :.', ,lsunfot 1osf time·(si' .... 12;0 :, '?::;;:,.::-· inieiseciicin capacity utilization·· · 101 :,,,;t,., · · --· ·rco Levet"oi serv1ce· G A-·r··· p""· cf(.,.)'-·-· .. ,. . -· ···f5' .. , .. ,,,,·,.r· ·-,·,,·,,o,•,,·:·''"""··""'·.,c:-"•, ,,,, .. ,,.,,., .. , ,r.1~ ys1s . 9.np__ .: m1~ _ __, •. , . ... .. ... . .. . _ _ _ , c Critical Lane Group Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest . Synchro 6 Report Page 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 192nd St & SR 515 1/23/2009 -I> \. tiiiovemer:ik'~i''''''" ::•·r, ··&"EBG,, :1:B~i:aRniiVBb-:q},Vaf:JWBR~JNa"C'~]i'fBmNBR'"':J'SBE:-i'"~af"f:sBR Lane Conf.!gu~~!!on,~., , ......... """'.4· , ... J', ........ r<t . __ f __ }"j_ __ +t+ ····-... ___ "i __ -?'t+._. __ _ ldem.flo~,(vp)jpl):,.,1 .. '. 'f'1,9!)0,,i19J)O" '1990. '190Cl>)909'l Hl00'''''1900}'•1900 •·1900 ,','1900'r•19QQ:c' 190..Q.. Grade(%) 0% 8% 1% -1% [q!c;11;,:~2.:3.t!~~! .. <~t.~.~ .. ~,>,l·t,~\);_::~;:,.~·:t.:_;1~_:.2i!~ .,i.~::.g~~Q;.,;:· .. ~~i:~~:~~1;.:,.~~~ ...... ~.JtI .. '.~1~~9.:~::-~:.~~,P-: .. k ~~-'.:~[ qz:,:.:~· ~,~-~~~):Qj;_:..·· ~:3~ t1 ... ~!:.:c:1 Lane UtiL Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frf· ,~·,: ij \SCiJJ·;~'li'f :ft i~i?. "" :.· ,., 1::-,' ~ ':·;~~;,<;j,i; -~; ,.,_,;1,; oo:::> '!]~5 ~ 2~,._-_; ':\.,,_,~·A.,• g~\-' .,~o. 85 ;;;0 :r1.:. Oot'~-'~o.s.s·, .. ~~;'t.,,~ ... 1:· .. >. f ooi,, <,_· ''0'.9_9 J, .. ;,,·,2: Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~ .,,_ ••. ' ... ~-.,,. .c.·, ., .. ,,-"_ -·· •""-;•, ..... -·~~--:· ." .. , ·-···--" . ·•· .. -· --• '·_: . .-_ -, ~ ' .. -.·-----.. ---·-..... • . .-.... .-----------._-· '·: ·•. -·. ', ·--· ---·-·-· .. •· ~· ... ,.. -.-.. -~ '"1 S.§!Jd', F,l9w(prot)"'''.' ·. '. __ ··:~ '·-.1870' '·1.599 ; , :,,,: ;1725·:;; _1520,;•-1778,.,,,Ml36;,·,. ,., ; ':,, ;.179~,,.A3561.,.ci'.<tr. 1 Flt Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd°'.:F;low (pei'rm) ,'.: ). ' ·•r,'i.: ,~' 1870 J 599 ,': . ' . '..' ·,:1725'.; 152o11t, 1 '778 ·''•3486• ";•' , .,, ·.,,; 1796 ,,.:, 3561· ,, ,,, ,,,.1 Volume (vph) . 37 283 101 .. 145 54 . 105 . 36 . 564 . 86. 225 880 54 Peak-hour faclor7PHF -·~ ,o:84,·::•• 0,84'·.J!O:~ ,. ;4 0.8J3i,.0,8!>,E'_p,e~:~o_93:,, ·:o;93,.,;.0cll~ ~~ .o'.9oc:''' Q.~o :,' 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 44 337 120 169 63 122 39 606 92 250 978 60 Rto~J~educitoffJvii,bi:'·1;.~o· ~•_o, ;_ :53' r 'i_.ci •\ : ·o-.i:.-~·7g.,;,2 ·ci; .··;: .. ff~, ; .·a · ., ·o;~:·-·:.i;::;;.,, .:a Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 381 67 0 432 43 39 687 0 250 1034 0 .... , • .,,. __ •>• • -•.,.,··~·· .,.~,~, ' ·•-'" • -,~,_., .. '"'" _.,_.,.,' •• '·• ·~•'•" ,;:;-• •-•'!'"'-"'" ''r,.'" . '"' • • :-• /~ ., . "'''ii'·-~/ . ·• ,, ,.,_ ,,..,, • -••,-•-"Jr' a• "' ':' ·-,,•·-·• •-m ,--·--· • • w -·' --• e,-•• ,t·• ----,-e • -·-• Heavy:Vehicl"'s:(%) ;· .. · .·:t%:.' 1% .. ''·· ·1%' ''2%'·• .;,•2%·:·.:···2%''" ·•,''1%":"' ·11% '" ''·1%('· ·• .. 1°/,,,., .. ,r,1%,,, ,-,,1o/o Turn Type Split pm+ov Split pm+ov Prot Pro! ·Protected· Phclses ·';: ,}·' ,rt' lt,d:A 1;· _',1-. ·:·; A::,::.,. ,,,,y. J5 .. ;, .. 2-)h·:,-•% .• -+ 8 -~::: '·;j~; ':·~--~ .: .. s:. ,-~,_ : ··~ .. 2·: .. l.,~· ·:;~ .. ~=Y:2c. ~-,~1-1···:-'·d·f''~~·~?---::_' ' '-.; Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuatei£Greer:if G'<sf''.Jt·;,;•.~.; 2e.2 :;;,J2:·r,, -· -. ;,;.~s:4;;::~3s::f ... ~i~§:s . :;· 29:2.• ;·· :-;'·~:Ts~s,";3s"':e~:··~'T-J Effective Green, g (s) 27.8 35.8 21.3 38.7 8.0 31.5 17.4 40.9 t,cJuate"if9!~; l;iaiio ,·, "''';:'.:''"'', ·.';"''o.2s" 1. 0;33,-, ·•: ,·,,_;:,;., 'o,j g'. ;;o,s5;;;:Ji: o:o'?(::<~o:i0'? ,:·.'~ .... :.::-016·2-:-o:s12 ,',ZJ Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 Vehicle.Extension.(s).,; •. : .:'. , .. ·.·A.a', ... '.:3.5./ ,,.,, .·· ' :' 3.5-" '2'.5 ,., "_3:5· (;· ·4:5,, ·n. -.' .,,-p-.. ,2:5,, ,,e· 4:0•,,::c•. ,. ,.,, Lane Grp Cap (vph) .. . . . 473 520 , 334 . 576 . 129 998 . . 284 1324 .v!~ ~.a!i§:!:r:9fc:·>: :2 :::.· '·:?2 ,) :cg;20", . o, qJ,,i -,,; 191.1 ~ t:{gJfE:;:g;Q?. :c:{J2g:-:;-·;: :§q) i!E:§lt?.JZ I:;.·:;; v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02 v/c)~alio','. ~'-' .,. ... . ''.. ~0:'.~f :'.9''f3,' :: :·?·::o~e9,2xo:ot,:)~cf39_-:J1-'~~\~~~.~·~.~PJffi~.;9Jr·i: ;:~:; Uniform Delay, d1 38.6 26.1 41.3 23.7 48.4 34.9 45.3 30.6 RrOQf'8iiS1C)r{F8ctOr;; . ···:·. J/:· ::·r-::,:·. ~ ';ro·o~~~,~J ~oo:~· ::::: . : ,·--~·:,·;f-,tjo"··::··: ,~1~·00 .... ·.,;,:'.~ 1< Oo~ :.;~i:,1~00· ':; '/~I,".;-. ~1 :000: _ ;:1 fQO_; .. -.,~ ·; -'_ .. ~,· Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 0.1 6.4 0.0 1.6 3.9 25.4 4.6 Delai(s);.'C;} -;;;,·.,,,",cei-;:;;: .~~:,:,, :;,::Mi:7~.r.26;2·:;,,:: ;<,;::.-)ft:;::· .··23.!i':·:·1?:~::'·3a'a.::·.' , ;,, ' "1,o:tt:35:2" ,:,~"'_li Level of Service D C D C D D E D i]~f~!~fftitt<~t. :' E•: ~. f.~3.g; · :t'i :;·:: -}',)ft 4'.i,~::.,i ,;'.i)e;6,·::::::.,":·::,: .. :,4~J.:'. .. :EJ HCM Average Control Delay 41.3 HCM Level of Service D ijcMS1ofQ'irilft9·ca~acify:rafiii2' ,,:· ,,~' zo:tif ; > ,.:,, ;,,, ,, ,·, ,,::-,;;;;; 1,:. ' ·:.· ~-: , , . . ~· :.-: · " Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 [nt_e:rji~citi9n ~ap~<;ily").itili~a:ttoi). :.::;_ .. 71.9%:" ;· ·1g,\_.l\~vefpf s~&i9i:· .. ~:-: -': _ :.c : . · ~ __ .. .., ~-,; ' ·;· ,, ~," ': •" I Analysis Period (min) 15 ·~~:J~fii!9?1.-4JJ1.e.-~fqGJ)~i;-_: .' ~::.~ ···-,..~.:~:. ~::.!.··-,:~.:.~1:· "·:~i:. ,.,J,,~-~~-,"~:::.,~:1,:,. ·.:.:··~M,::. ,;·:· .,, . ., .. ,, .......... ,., .... ,, ........ .-.. , .. ., ........ . Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW 43rd ST. & SR 167 NB on ramp 1/23/2009 ~oli'.iriili'(vpB)5!;2;~_ •:":--(zi@59j ·220,i~~C<' < . .o :··,:,•c;,·o·.:·1208_~ ''~8{ ·-1 320',~::··1,;.'1··-.:-_Aoa>1;7,' -__ o -,--,; 0.2'" "' Ci Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj.FloW(vph):;r7 __ .·i;',.3~6_,2370:::-:-0. _ ._o·._.1313 ':'526· . .._:395.;::, 1 . 504R O ---O°' . Q RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 5 0 0 0 hij'fi~:~~~~'i:?E6J.9~JYP.fi):'.,~:J;~tt§5::I~~~t9Yf.fr;.~\'..-.. ~Q::,~::;;.;_1bfifQ;\i:·'I~f~ :;,1?Icf?£~:~G.jj!i!:tt~lt@:?~I:·itl~~~J1iij]E;~tT£~Q:E11'.rl:.:~Q. Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% J>1rriTyper;. · -,: ,;{~rot .... : j: _ _-. ____ . J:erm,_~erm -''.:'. ____ P~m,(_; _, ><~:> J Protected Phases 5 2 6 4 ~8,r'i8~1~rp;;_c~eJVP~>1::t-~:~{~V(11 ·3so-~v-'l:23Qfa:;£f;~;.~?S,:>t·i;;;_1::·kP::~:'.:({i:: ·1;468~;:~:iz,:~5~/'.t~<50SJ~;;!507: ~)~.~:::· 4 7.6 .. i;:':~:"it'.'._.f~~;t~·~: .. ,:~:'i,\:·,:0:\~~2.:1~1-:5.~ vis Ratio Pro! 0.22 c0.67 0.37 vtsRalioPemi''·.:··· ·., _· -3i.~-----· .... -T ··_ ~-~o,19~-0.121 o.r2:--e:tt32';·~--c_ ·;::-~ • ~ v/c Ratio 1.02 1.03 0.89 0.46 0.39 0.39 1.05 J:f6i!i5iiii"J'.1i!~i:~c1j 2. , ':;)J11I!f -. -?Ifif,•: ~ . , ... i3.1?.:t:'.I?1l].·,.:::~rt'-.,'J3.t[LI3Lb.f\{};::l:: '~-_ 1,,,. ,-.. · _:;;: Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inciementai!bela'y; d2J;,:3,: so":?-~ ' 26)' ._,. ' :-. :,; ' 5 "'-'. "'"8) < ::2':~ -, ... a· t :'.';): t '. ·;:s.\~6';'.'.1:· ·:· . ' .. , Delay (s) 103.2 49.6 45.5 30.9 37.8 37.8 101.6 Level,of.Sfil'Jice __ .. _ .:'}, .. _.-,F_. ___ : D~---· _ · --.' -·-. D_.·: '-,C ' __ -D _fr ~D.,'. _ .F'if _ _; .· '•:Jvr. --·-1 Approach Delay (s) 57.1 41.3 73.5 a.a ;P.R[~~'§~];Q§L:'.;f:: .. , '. Lc,•:;'£'JS.';]{" '.'' lriterSeC:tion su·mmary;'·.:?:.; __ , .. ,, · · >: :..'i:·,._:_·' ~ .. :~~~.:-·. · '· • r·, , :.~,,,,_, ·· Springbrook Ridge 5:00 pm 1/22/2009 2010 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest -Synchro 6 Report Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency /Co. : TENW Date Performed: 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #8 -SE 172nd St/108th Ave SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: u. s. Customary Analysis Year: . 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: 108th Ave SE {Benson Rd S) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 66 335 8 10 360 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 360 8 10 387 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound· Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 10 1 5 34 2 65 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1 5 36 2 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No I No I Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR LTR LTR V (vph) 70 10 16 107 C(m) (vph) 1159 1196 260 400 v/c 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.27 95% queue length 0.19 0.03 0.20 1. 06 Control Delay 8.3 8.0 19.8 17.3 LOS A A C C Approach Delay 19. 8 17. 3 Approach LOS C C I I I u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: TENW Date Performed: 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: *9-lOBth Ave SE&lOBth Way SE Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: 108.th Way SE/Project Site Dr North/South Street: 108th Ave SE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Northbound 2 Movement 1 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? L T 6 375 0.90 0.90 6 416 2 Undivided o 1 LTR Yes Westbound 0 3 R 5 0.90 5 Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 8 9 Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade {%) L T R 5 0.90 5 2 o 0.90 0 2 0 33 0.90 36 2 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes Configuration 0 1 0 LTR I I 4 L Southbound 5 8 0.90 8 2 o T 424 0.90 471 1 LTR No Eastbound o 6 R 2 0.90 2 10 11 12 L T R 2 0.90 2 2 o 0 0.90 o 2 0 1 0 LTR 5 0.90 5 2 No Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 Lane Config LTR LTR LTR LTR V (vph) 6 8 41 7 C(m) (vph) 1089 1138 532 407 vie 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.05 Control Delay 8.3 8.2 12.3 14.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.3 14.0 Approach LOS B B I 12 I I I u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency/ Co. : Date Performed: TENW 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #10 -SR 515/Project Site Dr Jurisdiction: WSOOT/City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 With Project Project IO: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: Project Site Dr North/South Street: SR 515 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume 451 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 501 Percent Heavy Vehicles M~dian Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Movement Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 8 L T Percent Grade {%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 1 R Adjustments 3 R 13 0.90 14 9 R 13 0.90 14 2 4 L I 10 L I Southbound 5 T 1159 0.90 1287 2 T No Eastbound 11 T 0 0.25 6 R 12 R I __________ Delay, Approach Movement Lane Config NB Queue SB Length, and Level of Westbound Service __ ~--~----~ Eastbound V (vph) C(m) (vph) vie 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 1 4 7 8 9 10.0- A R 14 741 0.02 0.06 10.0- A 10 11 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency /Co. : Date Performed: TENW 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #11-108th Ave SE/S _Proj Site D Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: u. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: s Project Site Dr North/South Street: 108th Ave SE Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Northbound Movement 1 2 3 L T R Volume 386 0.90 428 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 2 T No Westbound Southbound 4 5 6 L T R 435 0 0.90 0.90 483 0 I 2 0 T TR No Eastbound Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles L T R ~ 0.90 5 0 L Percent Grade (%) O Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 I Configuration __________ Delay, Approach Movement Lane Config V (vph) C(m) (vph) vie 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS NB 1 Queue SB 4 R Length, and Level of Westbound 7 8 9 9.5 A R 5 797 0.01 0.02 9.5 A T R o· I Service~~~~~~~~~~ Eastbound 10 11 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: TENW 1/22/2009 Analys.is Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: #12-SE 172nd St/W Proj Site Dr Jurisdiction: City of Renton Uni ts: u. S. c.ustomary Analysi~ Year: 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: West Project Site Dr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~-c-~~~~~~~~~~Vehicle Major Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) L T 72 0.90 80 Undivided 1 No 0 TR Northbound R 0 0.90 0 7 8 9 L T R 0 0.90 0 2 0 10 0.90 11 2 Flared Approach: Lanes Configuration Exists?/Storage 0 No 0 LR 4 5 6 L T R 8 62 0.90 0.90 8 68 2 I 0 1 LT No Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 I I Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service~~~~~~~~~~ Southbound Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR V (vph) 8 11 C (ml (vph) 1518 980 v/c 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.03 Control Delay 7.4 8.7 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.7 Approach LOS A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: TENW 1/22/2009 PM Peak #13-SE 172nd St/C Proj Site Dr Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: Center Project Site Dr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 L T R L T Volume 82 0 B 70 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 91 0 8 77 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided I RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 L T R L T Volume 0 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No I Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR 0.25 6 R 12 R I Delay, Queue Approach EB WB Length, and Level of Northbound Service.,...~.,...,--~.,-~~~~ Southbound Movement 1 4 7 B 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR V (vph) B 11 C(m) (vph) 1504 967 vie 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.03 Control Delay 7.4 8.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.8 Approach LOS A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lf Analyst: Agency /Co. : Date Performed: TENW 1/22/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersect.ion: #14-SE 172nd St/E Proj Site Dr Jurisdiction: City of Renton Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 With Project Project ID: Springbrook Ridge East/West Street: SE 172nd St North/South Street: East Project Site Dr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.25 Major Street: Approach Eastbound -cc---c-,~~~~~~~~~~-Westbound Movement 1 2 3 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? L T 91 0.90 101 Undivided 1 0 TR No Minor Street: Approach Movement Northbound Volume 7 L 0 0.90 0 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0 Lanes Configuration 8 T 0 0 LR R 0 0.90 0 9 R 10 0.90 11 2 No 4 5 6 L T • R 8 77 0.90 0.90 8 85 2 I 0 1 LT No Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 I I Service ---~------Delay, Queue WB 4 LT Length, and Level of Northbound ----------Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config V (vph) C(m) (vph) vie 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 8 1491 0.01 0.02 7.4 A 7 8 9 LR 11 954 0.01 0.03 8.8 A 8.8 A 10 Southbound 11 12 I I I I I R I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix C 2010 Future Traffic Volume Forecasts ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC ------------!!II!!! ------ Springbrook Ridge 2010 Future Daily Traffic Volume Forecasts Existing Baseline Roadway Location GR 2008 2010 S 180th St/SW 43rd St w/o E Valley Rd 3% 35,500 37,700 S 180th St/SW 43rd St e/oSR167 3% 51.200 54,300 Carr Rd SISE 176th St w/o SR 515 3% 33,000 35,000 Benson Rd S ( 108th Ave SE) n/o SE 176th St 3% 19,300 20,500 SR 515 n/o 1-405 3% 34.900 37.000 SR 515 s/o 1-405 3% 39,000 41,400 SR 515 s/o S 21st St 3% 19.400 20,600 SR 515 n/o 108th Ave SE 3% 18,900 20,100 SR 515 s/o SE 176th St 3% 27,600 29,300 SR 515 s/o SE 192nd St 3% 34,200 36,300 ' Pipeline Baseline Vols 2010 700 38,400 1,700 56.000 700 35,700 200 20,700 200 37.200 200 41,600 0 20.600 0 20,100 0 29.300 300 36,600 Proj . 1,090 ~,. -· •-'·''"' '"·"• 2010 Trip Dist Proj Vols With Project % increase 15% 45% 45% 5% 20% 20% 20% 20% 15% 10% 200 38,600 1 o/o 500 56,500 1 o/o 500 36,200 1% 100 20,800 0% 200 37,400 1% 200 41,800 0% 200 20,800 1 o/o 200 20,300 1% 200 29.500 1% 100 36,700 0% Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Date Printed: 2/10/2009 Page 1 of 1 ----- Springbrook Ridge 2010 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts 20~8 Existing SR11a,-so.-, • ij " ;;_ • ,, SR51J/81ffl1SUIII "'"-• • " ,. ~'-;f---~-~-+~ § --SR51S/8:tfsl~ N ;;_ ~ '36] I "' j I I I u ~ • 8R51S/llaneonRCI-S ~ • TOTAL PIPELINE IR5111SGrad' 80710 n n "' "' "' '" "' • ,. -IIIRIU/81811181/8 ··~ • • SRa1s1121111S1..i • 10 u u 0 SR511/s.,t..,.,Rdl o I v I I I I " l • --- Growth Rate = Existing Year= Future Year= 3.0% 2008 2010 2010 Without Project IIU1JISG, ;; ~ "" g ii 857 1,0H 'Mo Increase= 6.5% 8R815181Sllllll/8 .• to, ~- .. 59 I J I I ;,ru I • • "' ... 'llo lno;:reaae = 6.6% SR 5141 fl !UI -• ~ o I 2n '" ,400 t 11, I I u ' ' ~ • 'Ki Increase " 6. 7% SA 5111 e.-Rd S ! • " "' '" "'Increase= 6.11% IB!I -----iiiiil -I!!!! l!!l!I - Project Distribution _, ,R-mlaG·' '- ~ ' ~ ~ IRl15181ffll8118 .._ ~ ~ SR511/U1st- ~ ' .. '---11-~-c-~-+-~ ~ ~ SR 5111 B9Mofl Rd S ~ ~ ~ .. '""' "" " " Project Trips SIU1f1S0ral• Entar Exll ' ' Pass-By s,i. I 4 4 .: • 5R5UIS16thstfs ~ ·e; ", ,-~· -., ' SR518 IS 15111 5118 Pup«DI'' • • -SRl111Sl11t---SRS11/BZ1MSI..« • • 0 • .. 8R51$IIIMloonR11S -BRS1118onlonRdS • 00 " " " 0 29 0 o -,,. a • 0 2010 With Project ' -: SRl1flli ~ § "' 1.049 Pn,ject~• 0.4% "i', _,-,---·1 J~)-?,<f, 8R51SIS1Slh8H8 1t1Dr __ ,, . • ~ "' s9 1 JI 120 i!l l!l "' .... Projlc!SNn• 0.6% -~-~ ;<.-~ ~SAl1'1S21flllbMI ~-.. I_ • Pn,jaa:$~• _ O-!% .} ·aR-S1i1S..nso,,.-R.i8. ~ o v qw § ii' -/, ':''•","' "" "' Pn,j,,ctst..~ 3.2"' Transportation ~ineenl,g Northwest, LLC Oate Prtnted: 211Dl2009 Page1 of4 --------- Springbrook Ridge 2010 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts I Growth Rate= 3.0% Existing Year= 2008 Future Year= 2010 I 2008 Existing TOTAL PIPELINE 2010 Without Project ' ' ' ' BR au, SE 171th SI lR611/IE17UISI SR11515et7'11,St !;1 i! . • ;; i!! il "' " " '" "' 1,757 " ,, 1,523 '·"' ~-• 0 0 ~ • 'Ill Increase= '"' '-BR6111SE1ffn<l8t •. ' ' SR &1B rSE 112nd st SIU111SE1Und81 ~ "' '" ' 3 '" = "" "' ,., " ' '" "' "" • • . ~ • " lncreaae = 7.6% ~ surd at1sR 1'7NII Flom i.Un:IIUSR11J7NB C:lld$t/SR1'7NB1tam '-0 • 0 " ~ " m 1,670 " " "" fi I 0 ' 0 " 'Iii Increase"' ''"' ~ 1o11111AvesersE1lh:IS1 . . -• 1DllhAV.SE18E17tnd$t ,· ·101111AwSE /SE 172nd st • ii . • • " " ' ' " " " " ' ' " ,0 ii • . • ~ • %Increase: , ... -cm!! ---iiiiiiill -l!!!!!!!I -- Enter Exit " 49 Project Distribution Project Trips sR115,se17lthS1: ! ~ ' ' ~ ' ' • " .-1' - SIU1l/SE1'21o:!st 8i:t611/SE19Zn<18t ~ ' .. ' 2 " ' 2 ~ t . . 14Jn:18t/lllR1'7NB 'S4Jrdstf8R 117 NB- t ~ 0 • ::~ I I oo~ '" " ... ~ t ! 0 . • 01d1Av.8EISE11Zffl1SI -· 109th Ave SE/ SE 172nd It l * N N :d IN I 6: .. " '"' ~ i ~ ~ L a " I Enter Exit 5 ' Pass..Sy 2010 With Project ' ' sR&msE11w.~i" .•. ,,, ' "' i ,. -,_ ,_._. ' -~"' 1Rf15/SE171111St 'i.. 0 0 • ' "" '"' '·'°' " ~ ~ Pn,jodsti.r.~ 1.J'II, ' ,-C -!c;' -0 6, -N'U! 51~m ,n,;.; si ,.• 111:au 1$E ,12,,.. &1 ' '" 30< ' '" "' ~ 0 0 ~ * ,' Prqa<:1$1aoe~ 0.5% 8.Urdsc1811.11J111B,Ra11 ':': ,; i;: .. _,; ~ S4'rtl 1h1SR1l7"1Bit.m "" ?"j :; · 0 0 0 • :~ I I 6 '·"' ' 2,612 0 0 0 i, Pn:ijeclsi-~ O.B'II, • • ~ ,,_" 'f.J 10lthAYSSEIIE 172nd St' ' H, -~09f!IA..:SEISE·17fnci"81 "-" /_'::_.'.·' 0 • • " :d I I 6: 64 f 3:_J __ ~4 --i-I1 " ' 101 65 " O· 0 I , ~ Project Share" 6.2'!1, Tranapartat1C11 Eng!neenng Ncrthwesl, u.c Date Plinted: 2/10/2009 Page 2of 4 I ,, • 0 l; .'..',. -0 ,, ~ R " i • ,..; ,• a . /., p. 1, ~ f r • j or I ~ • , 0 ·e-·• 1· rs l I· i '" "' ! "' ... "' '" ; " .. • l ! ,0 •• . l ,,,;; ',,Ill 1i ff I 0 '! "' '" /;; 6!.L'L 65>'1 . ' '" "' ' .~ 0 .:; ,,.~ .. N 'i ;; ,• • w ,< i I • ,; = !:!" " ~ D '1-' 0 ! ,.. ,,i • ''"O ,:: • ! iii • I I ;; "! . . ~ . '.I w . 'i ! I:. • • >~ • • -~ • ·, ... I • ·-: I :1 • • ·-• • I • • "• 0 • • ! • a. "~ 'C " " 5 " " " " I " I-• ~ *g I '. I li ~r l ,; • •• I • . " " ; • " " 'f ii J l I • = • I ,. l ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ l C ! • • 0 ! " • ,I , • " "' .,, . 5 "" "" .,, .,, .. I E ! /!l . I ~ • ! "" "'" • "" ''" 1 "'" ""' • i ! ... "e' • I .. I •• I I ~ ~ • t l a l ~ " t t • 0 f ! 0 ~ " " t • • • I l " . " m o ·! I ) • I • i ~go • ! .i • MN N I .. a "' "' • • "' "' • '" "' • ' • ' ' ' • 0 u . I ~ " " i I -.. ;; ~:~ • "" "' : LSL'L l "' "' • , .. ! 0 ;; i I ~ .5 , 0 • :ii s N • " .... J I w • a • " " • J!l i • • w 5 I 0 z • • • • u :; ;; " " I ' " " ! w ,! 0 .. I ... ii: . i ~ ~ . ii . • • • I ~ ii i ~ ~ !:! ' I "' • • "' I C 0 a I e , •• • 0 • • I- 3 • 0 i G> :c "' • ! ! "' ... C: • "' "' • "" "" a, "' ' "ti : ti • I ix .. • I • i _..:,; w ;; 0 .. m . • e e 0 . '-" "' i 580'[ 580'L ; '" '" ~ -g,~ !ii ii • d •• • I C: ... 'Co I c.-= ,, • • ., !ii ------------11!1111!1 ------ Springbrook Ridge 2010 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts I Growth Rate= 3.0% Existing Year= 2008 Future Year= 2010 I Enter Exit Enl:af EJclt 30 -49 5 6 2008 Existing TOTAL PIPELINE 2010 Without Project Project Distribution Project Trips Pass.Sy 2010 With Project ·~te,n,,,1sue_.,-tc:t11bDr 13 1S1r:nc1a11c1111erP MoDr _, eE11zn11m1c.a, sn.Or 13 senwac1'ca., sa.0r 13 ,-;E1izncrst1c.nt.t u.0r _,a~:.·ae1~'11u6~';' ~}~.=se11-S11c.n1e,P ect611eDr 0 o O O O lg ~II~ gl I~ =~ -r = : : : : = ;7 . ~ i: :~ . ~: = : I I O O O O O ~ i CO~ % lr.crean,. 6.3% 20.6% ,. ,. . 1,4 1• --U _- ShO, SE17Znclstleut SlleO. Se1TlndiMIEist haDr , -8E172"dst/East 6 .. 0r IE112ftdl11En1 1c1&11s0r 11111r0r ,,.,;, ~ l ~ 11 ~ ~ 11 ~ 58 --··sao 062 62 so,i,1s 230 on es -~ .. r.. .. . -.7 . : .. , ~.. . I I 0 O O O ~ ~ 00 S!' 0 0 <O ~ "-l~" 6.3%_ ~-~ 28.0% Transportatjon Engineering Nortflwest. LLC oat,, Printed: 211CY2009 Page 4 of ,4 I I . I I · .. I .. I .. I . . I . ' ' I '.·. '.'' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I . I': '' ·.· ' ' . ' . . '. '. I · ... , ' . ·I .... . ' I . . I I . ; ., I ' .. ' ' ' ' -; . ' '1 ,,1·1·-1'" - I ,.,, WATERSHED ( .. ~, r·· • f I) 0 . I ' ' \.,.d,v, 1'1\N 'i January 25, 2008 CPH Consultants Attn: Jamie Schroeder 733 -7th Avenue, Suite I 00 Kirkland, WA 98033 SCIENCE & DESIGN Re: Cugini Propertv wetland and stream delineation studv. TWC Ref# 080109 Dear Jamie, Mike Foster, Ecologist, and Greg Johnston, Senior Fisheries Biologist, made. a visit to the Cugini property on January 11, 2008 to investigate onsite drainages, determine if they reached the threshold of regulated streams according to City of Renton Code, and, if so, determine. their classification(s)., We also screened the. property for jurisdictional wetlands. The Cugini property is located northward of the intersection of Benson Drive (SR 515) and 108th Way SE and has been recently annexed into the City of Renton from King County (Figure I -site plan). This letter summarizes the findings of this siudy and details applicable federal, state, and local wetland and stream regulations. The following attachments are included: • Field Delineation Sketch • Wetland Determination Data Forms • Figure I -CPH Site Plan with Watershed Company markups • August I 0, 2000 letter from Stephen C. Conroy, Ph.D. of King County ODES, Reference AOOP0228 . . . . Methods The subject property was evaluated for wetlands using methodology from the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Manual) (Washington Department of Ecology [Ecology] 1997). Soil, vegetation, and hydrologic data were sampled at several locations on the property to document our determination. We recorded data at five locations on-site. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of a stream identified on the subject property was determined based on the definition provided by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and WAC 220-110-020(57). Areas meeting this definition were determined to be the OHWM edge. The OHWM is located by examining the bed and bank physical characteristics and vegetation to ascertain an approximation of the water elevation for mean annual floods. 750 Si><th Street South i Kirkland, WA 98033 p 42S.822.5242 , f 425.827.8136 I watershedco.com Schroeder, J. January 25, 2008 Page 2 of 5 One stream was flagged on site. The OHWM of Drainage "A" was field-flagged beginning at Benson Drive (SR 515) and extending to the north property line along I08th Way SE. Flags were nmn-bered OHW IL through OHW 53L along the left bank facing downstream (the south or east side), and OHW IR thro.ugh OHW 43R along the right bank facing downstream (the north or west side). The stream was classified using guidelines in section 4-3-050(L) of the Renton Municiple Code (RMC). We used on-site and off-site field observations to classify the subject stream Findings The subject property is located east of Panther Creek in the Duwamish/Green Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) #9. The site slopes generally from its high point at the nord1east corner to its boundary with Benson Drive South in the west. Black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa, FAC), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum, FACU) and red alder (A/nus rubra, FAC) dominate the forested canopy of the subject site, with some Oregon ash (Fraxinus iarifolia, FACW) and young western red cedar (Thuja p/icata, FAC) present. Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+), osoberry (Oemleria ceraciformis, FACU) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, FACU) dominate the understory, with some sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU) and dewberry (Rubus 11rsi1111s, FACU) present. Some Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii, FACW) borders a stream channel on site. No jurisdictional wetlands are located on-site. However, two drainages were identified on-site and are shown on the accompanying site plan as Drainages "A" and "B". Drainage "A" (Stream "A") emerges from a piped drainage system along the northwest side of I08fu Way SE, upstream of the site. Flow is ditched along l08'h Way SE before turning to cross the central portion of the site in a westerly direction. Drainage "A" flows within a defined channel across the site, flowing through a red alder, big leaf maple, and black cottonwood forest with a salmonberry, sword fem, ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor, FACU), and Himalayan blackberry understory. Flow enters a piped system upon reaching the northea.st side of Benson · Drive (SR 515) (see Figure I). . · Drainage ;'B" enters the site from a 12-inch storm water outfall at the north property boundary near the west property corner. The drainage crosses the western tip of the site in a southwesterly direction as unconfined surface sheet flow through a red alder, black cottonwood, big leaf maple, and Oregon ash forest. Himalayan blackberry dominates the understory, though sword fern, osoberry, and other shrub and groundcover vegetation is also present. Flow from this drainage also enters a piped system upon reaching Benson Drive, and it appears that the flows from the two on-site drainages combine within the roadway to emerge on the southwest side of the road into an open channel, behind some apartments, extending down slope to the west. Our findings regarding these drainages are consistent with those reported by Stephen Conroy, PhD., Senior Ecologist with King County's Department of Development and Environmental Services in his letter to Phil Davidson of Claremont Development Company, dated August IO, 2000 (attached). l. Schroeder, J. January 25, 2008 Page 3 of 5 In that letter, Dr. Conroy concluded that Drainage "A" (referenced as flowing through Lots 9 and 148) was "a drainage feature that meets the definition of a King County class 3 stream." He indicated that the stream was dry throughout most of the site during his August 8, 2000 site visit and that it was highly unlikely that salmonids migrate to this stream reach during the winter due to steep gradients down slope and lack of suitable habitat on-site. He noted that the stream channel was well defined in places, but not in others. The King County class 3 stream definition in force at the time of Dr. Conroy's letter indicates that he considered this to be a seasonal stream without salmonid fish use. We concur with Dr. Conroy's findings. The corresponding classification of this stream under current City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4-3- . 050(L)(I)(a)(iv), is class 4. · Dr. Conroy also concluded that Drainage "B" (referenced as flowing through Lot 174 in his letter) wa.s "a drainage feature which appears to convey only storm water" and that it was not a stream and would not be regulated as a stream according to then-applicable King County code sections. He indicated that the drainage pathway was very poorly defined and likely only evident . in response to storm events, and that local topography upslope did not indicate that a channel was historically present. At the time of our site visit, Drainage "B" carried a fair amount of flow, perhaps in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 cubic foot per second (cfs), though this was following a several-week period of appreciably higher than average rainfall during the wettest time of year. The drainage is fed by a roadside ditch extending along the east side of 106th Avenue SE, which collects and concentrates water for a distance of nearly 2,000 feet. Historically, this runoff would have been considerably less due to forested conditions with higher infiltration capabilities, and would not have been collected in the ditch running along 106 1h Avenue to be discharged at its present location. Rather, it would have either infiltrated or proceeded more directly down slope along a number of pathways and would not likely have been concentrated enough to form a stream channel at any one location. Furthermore, in spite of the fairly high-observed flows, a defined channel has failed to form through the leaf litter and forest duff along the drainage pathway on- site. Hence, we concur with Dr. Conroy's August 2000 conclusion that Drainage "B" does not meet the threshold of a jurisdictional stream feature. Upstream of the site, in the ditch along the east side of 106th A venue SE, this drainage may be considered to be a class 5 water according to RMC Section 4-3-0SO(L)(l)(a)(v). However such class 5 waters are not regulatory features as defined by the 2006 City of Renton Municipal Code and, as such, do not carry or have regulatory buffers or materially constrain site development. Class 5 waters must be non-salmonid-bearing and either a) flow "within an artificially constructed channel where no naturally defined channel previously existed," (as is the case here) and/or b) be "a surficially isolated water body less than one-half (0.5) acre (e.g., pond) not meeting the criteria for a wetland." On-site, Drainage "B" would not even qualify as a class 5 water under this definition because it does not flow through a defined channel, artificially constructed or otherwise. Drainage "B" was not flagged because it was not determined to be a regulated stream feature and hence does not have a defined ordinary high water mark. < ' Schroeder, J, January 25, 2008 Page 4 of 5 We also assessed the area flooded by Drainage "B" for wetland characteristics. The soil at 10 inches depth within the flooded area (see Field Sketch, DP-l) was a brown (l OYR 4/3) sandy loam with no redoximorphic features. Black cottonwood, Himalayan blackberry and sword fern dominate the area surrounding the sample point. Though the area around the sample plot was inundated by one-half inch of sheet-flowing water from Drainage "B", the area was determined to not contain jurisdictional wetland. The non-hydrophytic plant assemblage and non-hydric soil suggests the presence of inundation and saturated soils does not extend into the growing season, a criteria for jurisdictional wetlands. The site also contains other areas that were saturated or had surface seepage at the time of our visit. Soils in these areas range from a brown (l OYR 4/3) sandy loam to a very dark grayish brown ( I OYR 3/2) sandy loam, with no redoximorphic features (see Field Sketch, DPs 2 through 5). Osoberry, sword fern and dewberry dominate the areas around these data points. Soils and vegetation do not meet wetland parameters in any of the areas sampled. The presence of hydrology likewise appears. to be short-lived and likely does not extend into the growing season. We presume these areas would not exhibit saturation within the top IO inches of the soil for a sufficient duration during the growing season to be considered jurisdictional wetland. Local Regulations Streams are regulated under the Critical Areas Regulations section of the RMC. According to RMC 4-3-050(L)(5)(a)(i), Drainage "A", a class 4 stream within the City of Renton requires a 35-foot buffer. Additionally, "the Reviewing Official may require a building or activity setback from a critical area or buffer to ensure adequate protection of the critical area/buffer during construction and ongoing maintenance of the activity. A requirement for a setback shall be based on the findings of a critical area repott or a peer review required for the activity. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)" (RMC 4-3-050(E)(5)). The RMC requires that an applicant adjust proposed site plans to avoid and/or minimize impacts to critical areas and their respective buffers. If avoidance is not reasonably possible, the standard buffer width of Stream "A" may be modified using one of two provisions in-the City code - RMC 4-3-050(L)(5)(c) or (d). The minimum buffer width allowed for a class 4 stream is 25 feet under either of these options. Buffer reduction with enhancement may be approved if the applicant demonstrates that buffer functions will be maintained, the action will not degrade riparian habitat, and no direct or indirect, short-term or long-term, adverse impacts to Stream A will result from a regulated activity. The site has high potential for enhancement, including Himalayan blackbetTy and trash removal, and dense planting with native riparian vegetation. Buffer averaging may be approved if the applicant demonstrates. that the reduction in the standard buffer will result in no net loss of function, the buffer is contiguous and the total buffer area is not reduced. The additional building setback may not be modified. · The City of Renton may allow the on-site crossing of Stream "A" per RMC 4-3-050(L)(8)(a)(i). The proposed route must be shown to have the least impact on the stream and buffer area, minimize interruption of downstream movement of wood and gravel, and should be perpendicular to the flow of Stream "A" where it crosses the stream and buffer. The City requires that such a crossing must be designed "according to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Passage Design at Road Culverts, 1999, and the National Marine Fisheries .,. )', Schroeder, J. January 25, 2008 Page 5 of 5 Service Guidelines for Salmonid Passage at Stream Crossings, 2000, or equivalent manuals as determined by the Responsible Official." Impacts associated with the crossing must be mitigated following guidelines in RMC 4-3- 050(L)(3)(c)(ii). "Mitigation to compensate alterations to [Stream "A") and associated buffers shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic and hydrologic functions and shall include mitigation for adverse impacts upstream or downstream of the development proposal site. No net loss of riparian habitat or water body function shall be demonstrated." The on-site potential to restore riparian habitat and buffer function through invasive weed removal and dense native plantings is high throughout the Stream "A" buffer. State and Federal Regulations Wetlands and streams are also regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any filling of Waters of the United States would likely require notification and permits from the Corps. Federally permitted actions that could affect endangered species (i.e. salmon or bull trout) may also require a biological assessment study and consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Application for Corps permits may also require an individual 401 Water Quality Certific_ation and Coastal Zone Management Consistency determination from Ecology. Please note that the findings of this letter, including stream classification and resulting buffer width predictions, are subject to the verification and agreement of local, state and/or federal regulatory authorities. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. · Sincerely, 1hJL~ Mike Foster Ecologist Enclosures: Field Delineation Sketch Wetland Determination Data Forms Figure I -CHP Site Plan with Watershed Company markups August 10, 2000 letter from Stephen C. Conroy, Ph.D. of King County DOES, Reference AOOP0228 P?-~" SW l/-1 5£{.; 2V rv,•,"l 2:-:JfJ /15E, W.M. CUGINI PROPERTY BENSON.ROAD KING COUNlY WASHJ)IGTOrl ,.( .. ~-· ··--~:··; ,~;-,.,, . -~ .. -.~.:--,~~:l~-~1', ~--~~:,.c:_-: ' -,, . ~ :,, ... : ,:_c.;'~-' ::~~/~:;;·:~::: ;.~~;,-" ,,:>-;:::' :--i,., , ,i .-I_ •h,, .. · °i,f •, /5... . ~-,,:-··--•}" .. 1 ""' .. • . -.,. ---· ---.. -·· -•• -> ,~,.,f. i,;,-.-------· '.~ ·: • :,:.. • ... ¥7 ··-.-5*.:--"';_ .. -"-""'"' -;";:t·f· ... ·-,11a1r-ro·w · J------------, .\ \ . ..-. ---~·._, .. _:,,cc,. -....!:-~~,,.~..:::· '· •· .,_ .• ·-• • " S..1701'• I •,•., · \ • :-, • ,.'-~~ ~ • 0 ,J.·'· ... •:,, .. •' , \ ' I ;$~ ... -~.. . ,_.:. ·-~-•"":"-":!!I-\~~\ .. / ' '· -l ' : ~?tF:/' . .""•,.,·-~;..-\. r~)~4.!l .• . --.,P.-, I 'i .·.,,.., . ;,:~ "~~.... ·• "": :·,~ .;:~·::: ;, ... :;7u):t. iti~':'!°'7 _'-.:..f J ·-r. .~.'-•.. ,-• .:-: ._ .. _ ... ~~-~: •• -• -. ,... ___ ... ~ -w a) . . " ,, ,,. . "'. "--·--\ :· ~> ,,..,-,;,c;;:.;,~ ·. _.. ~ Drainage B I · ·, · ,-,,,..,; . ' .,,,.,. n:, .. ~ • C / • ' •t i'.;:">,O: ,.<~ I>/' °'<' •' ·'··~ ~·· ' ' .. ,• . -·-··· ,. ... _.. ·~ if, ·~~ . , ' , '--__......L='"-=":-----1 ,.:,.; /~ -r,.. • • •• e~,..... .., ... . -, ~, ' . , ~----.___ ... '"" ___.-. • ?lu.,'"""'A} Trr'i.•f'..._ o, .. ~. : I l . ______ ... -.. -"'-~~...., '"i: \• ~'>!,.--;":!"'"'----# i , 1a'",'11 rt•J4.li:' .1 ·-.:'ho~ _, --------, .... ---_-..;;;., --· ,). .·, 4::: / ::~ · l J ~ -<:: "~ -' } ,:, :\J--M-,-:J:-·, Drainage "A" (Stream A) ~.,,i;_'.'t·.. i, l ,:"_/ ·_ · ·) i,,;\/ ... -., . .., " i-., ., ... ~ ' .. , 1-··"•' '\ -·-·-f';·-' •, ',.,I ;'-"• """''"" ~ ~· . "'l< .• . • : . ' . • • --·" ··, .. -~ .,,,_ / ' ,' Y,~ •. •·,· :S-o.,_ ~--. . ·1{~~ . _,.--~---·--· · --:::---::.:. · -·· , .. · ,}j ,.. _ / .. ,.,,,..,,, • ., ·ya J..~·-•• ~ --. . . -· .-. .• --= 'A ~· .:, •• :<It.-' -I • •,, •.._ . / _' ;, '• ~ "' ' • ,, ,. • ::,,,. • • 1....-, • . . . '. . ' -· ff ,.__.,,.·". · .... , s-·, '"-----"''·1<'->4 / ;'(, .. ,,..,,,,,,,, ·- JN.z,Dt:r,, v,-...,cJ'· ~x · ... _"' . .. --· --~ /.."'~· .... i : ..... "" ....... ~,-3.!l!..!!I'.'. Flow contained in tight-line ~JM 88 ''. -./:".ir~ .h· <' ' >!'lt m'! ..._ ii. ·,,;,: (·'' ·-· 1ff~1' ~-;!.~tz~.-'", • ·~.;.. . . . /'. T,,,-F, .• ' • '-"dP°J-•. l ,/ . . '· -~ / m.t-~J.21 '~ ii : \.. P"»-,!:;i.', '!•:! ,....,. [-~·'' ' "~' ,_ f~ '.lii..J.'J.3.e.""' ./ , .. ';, • ... ··. . ·, / ' ~:·~(-.; . · .. '.;;,--~": ./ ~~ ·~-·-. ;•' ;:,..."' _/'. . ; ~ ... :.. ;~·-' -,,,.· · .. ,B./ ~ .. ' ./"". ·~-· . -,' ... , ""·' ~ ~-. ~ . ' . . . ·;, '. ,· _ .. •" .,.··,,_:J(.7;.<t,· -. . ._ MIJ. A!!'ftL..~ . .. : ;·r~: ': . . --~? / Mi'f"}l,U: ' ~--~,·~:.) ... / ~-~ . :r,)x_'"'°,(~,.. ccr:C!PTL!.41. !i!TF ;::v."4 a;.,=-.c -tt\"" ..--:::-;.'.';-:!"."::1~~-~•""! .,_ .. :. = __ ... _;;.--;:~:;;~:.~:"·' .-.;~ 4-J,:D:'· • d·" CP!H (4~.; ' w «:!_~'.!!" I ~~ . ~ . ~-===- , ·-J ~--~ ~ ':-:j.: ~-:-:: .. _;,:-~·: ....... ~ .. .., ...... .. i::::: -· ,~· • = ,,.,_ t-" ..i..ir.::a ~ ... ~~"•~• ! .:>'1':l~ -~-. -·f Figure 1 -CPH Site Plan with Watershed markups. .. :' ,- ' .. :~ .. :ODES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-121.9 August 10, 2000 . Phil Davidson Claremont Development Co. 515 116"' Ave, Suite 108 Bellevue WA 98004 Reference:· AOOP0228 Dear Mr. Davidson: .• I performed a site visit on August 8, 2000, to the lots near SR5I5 and Benson Road \Vhich were the·. subject of discussion in the above noted pre-application meeting. · The purpose of the site visit was · to examine drainage features and to determine if the drainage features were regulated streams as defined in KCC 2IA.06.!240. Lots 9 and 1 ~8 contain a drainage f~ature that meets the definition of a Class 3 stream, not a Class 2 stream as indicated on the site plans supplied for my review. The stream was dry throughout most of the site, with a few residual pools that still contained water. It is highly unlikely that salmonids migrate to this stream reach during winter due to the high sustained gradients downslope and the lack of suitable habitat· within the site. The channel was approximately I to 1.5 feet wide with silt/sand as the predominate substrate. There were a few reaches with gravel substrate. . In some areas, the channel was ill-define~ and probably consists ofsmall braids. Riparian vegetation included a relatively dense understoi:y with a mature deciduous overstoi:y. KCC 2 lA.24.360 currently requires that a minimum buffer of 25 feet be established around Class 3 streams. A 15 foot building setback is also required in addition to the buffer requirements. KCC 2 lA.24.370.H.2 permits relocation of a Class 3 · stream only for the purposes of enhancing the stream. It is· unlikely that approval to move the stream closer to existing structures or impervious surfaces would be granted since this would not be consistent with enhancing the stream. · · · . . . . . Lot 174 contained a drainage feature ;hich appears to convey only stormwater. Water is · directed onto the site via an 18 inch diameter concrete culvert. l11e channel downstream of the site is vei:y poorly defined and likely is only evident during storm events. Upslope, loc_al topography does not indicate that a channel was present historically at this site. Furthermore, a topographical break is present about I 00 feet east of the site. Therefore the contributing basin area is extremely small and is unlikely to collect sufficient water to create a natural • o Page2 · August10,2000 channel. Therefore the drainage feature on this lot is not a stream as defined in KCC 21A.24.1240 and would not be regulated as a stream. Please contact me at 206 296 7138 if! can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Stephen C. Conroy, Ph.D. Senior Ecologist .. • I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP :ti m 0 m < m C ffi ):( ::!: l=I 00 l=I =l w "Tl m co (") ., c:: 0 C'l " -0 z " i -'"d ~ :,ti 0 ,.., '"d "' t'l'l ~ ~ I I •'' -,. P«'1( c~~, (', '-' ... , .. I I I \ \ I l '" g E 1:- I ' ' s ~ ~ I ' ~~ I § § ~ ! ' i 2 .:'J ~ " §~ .• ' €~ 'i).: e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I §•o ' i ! • g ' . ' '. a ' . I ~ ~ ' ' ' " I f, ~ 0 e \ / I I 106TH AVE. S.E. VI "' " ·"' VI " " "' VI N w ~ N (A z "' u, '" ;, a:: ~ ~ 0 n ~ > " r 0 ".' z 0 ., ~ • • ~ " • • ; • zro oo~ -j -j I -< I r:: O I z., I ci I :,, ~ I oz I '--< I Co I U1 z -j s: Cl z -j / ',. ,I i ! ~) -' ilil i; i, 111 mi I 'I in ''''I iii l , I f 'I l1T I ' 11w1 I ii ml m;1 ii l I j1 p ' 1; ~ 7-! ll l l !i,. !! l! i i ' . ! .. I l! !i Ii . !. II . !h II I! I' ! . .I ! .. ·;11 ;! !I ii I !1 , 11 /il -;-s 11:: I!!~! I 11 i':I 111 u !! ii , ' . "ii'fl ! ,1 .. 11 I' 'I < 6 .. 1 mu I Hif iii !.,iii' i•ji• i !d,I, '!!!! I I .. . I• ~ "! !! I ' jl • • •• ' l IJ QfD 2l r . . ii '1 !l ,. I ~!;, ,! ~! !! ! ! i iji .,l•j! ! ;• Tl .,, :;!O "' ,. i I i I 11 j! I! 1mi , ·u;; ;I! 1!'11 'II ! 1,·· "!•i1l! ITI .,, § Ji li :") co OJ: u~~· i 11!!! Ii" -r,m ~ ., i Iii~ Iii~ l " I , ! 11 'Ii . I • -"' :?I~ ; '"Ii ' I I ! !~i l ,::: ~.,, :a: ,, "' = o> . ::, = u:, z2 ~ l If !I j!l''II z )> ~ PRELIMINARY PLANNED "I I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE i11 II· i~i • I'·· 1' Cl 0 rlli URBAN DEVELOPMENT ljl i . ill 0 i 11 .J RENTON WASHINGTON riri. w • 11 m ::c m n m < m 0 M .. ~ ..... ·----·-·-·-------....... --·- ITTll lJ ''!!i 'ljh l11•t d1 i i / / 9 :xi :;;m :; m " -wz ~< q ' :-:.. :.:::.::. m z 6 ~ -0 i; z ·-T , .• -: __ ; . . . . z " i r Q Q '\ OK RIDGE SPRJNGBRO y PLAN TREE INVLIESN,._~~~ITECTS C/0 BAY AND BENSON ROAD SR SIS (BENSONR~:~~. WA XJ m n m < m 0 ,, 1'11 co -,._,, ,..., = = LD / / / / / I I ' I ' / ,' '~ ------·· - ' ' r··-- I ' SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN I ' . --,, -~. I / I ' ' I / __ ,,,,. .. ::0 .,, m rr, n a, m --...... c::. I /'i"I ...... = 0 = U) ... / / I" l I • r'\l 1'1'W'lj' ' 0 ' ,,·,' 1 r Ul @ Ii f / / ,.,,,,_,.._ ;.,.,.,.,.,=,· I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE CONffiOL PLAN ·::,';?: I y': . . ffi ):( ~ l=I I» l=I =I I-" 0 D m n ~ m C "Tl ITl .co / ,- I I , / , I // ~--"-/ , I , , / I I I I , / I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN ' .. ·--!, - I I ' """""' . ......,.,.. ""'°'""'°"""'"'"""''" ~!~I rf~ 1 ~ ·~i IH!! ··11 ll 11 lijil 11·! ,H; ! ~ i I I II ii Ill! 1 j! ! ~~Hi ·Hi f!ii oj' < 1 ... , fnp ' { ~ ~ ~n~ 1,111,: ~1l'l!i ! 1llli g ' ! ~ "' C ~ C I m rn i ~ z HI! 0 ~ lT I I I !jilliiilli z ~ ,1l1•i,, 111 lilt "' 1'! ! i ! 111 1111111 l 11,, :il < 0 Qm -~ 'Tl :;15 I hj f Ui n rr, -., ' •I ! • ') co O:!: I· n --nm l -if~ I , o,f ! ... ....., .. n ....., ~~ ~lo iii dli = ' = Oz ii • j ji' CD zz o " ,I -,., "' . ·• I :;'! w ~PPl _. {_.; ~M _,, ---- l~hilfiYl111!'i!! 111111 ! Iii ill p lll! q !iii! ' ! ' l ' · ! 1 I ! iilj'P'll'!i ! ; II j! . 'II' II I ' -. . -. ---. : -11nnniP1~i ! if Hi .il I I • 1;,,a;;,1,,,., i Ii! iii 11 ill ii 0 "Tl ,.._, ! ; ·-..... !!PP! 1 , l ! 1J, I !; . p(J ,,, I ! !!!IP II S' i!nn l l il JI Hiiii u il " ii .. II II II so..•Hrruu,lE\'IS>ONS °"""""""'"' --· ? z -< ,; I 8 C :;; 0 " ~ § " > z 0 G I i .. t' I ir -i ,U,i!U l"il1i"!, ,1 I .. , 11h11di1 .·· !.iM,,h . -! ) ii! .~ ·s . ,\ ·· 1 .· I! ,· .... • ,-~ /<< ffflj .p{,°' ,f~" SPRINGBROOK RIDGE LANDSCAPE PLAN CJO BAYLIS ARCHITECTS SR SIS (BENSON DRJVE) AND BENSON ROAD RENTON.WA I g~ I ii I( ~I I (/) "O ;:o -ZI G) Cil ;:o 0 0 ;i::; ;:o -0 G) 111 > z 0 (/) () > "O 111 "O > z t<li 8!:i! '-< ~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ 1 0,1 ~ 1! ~' ' ~2 n~ > S,C\C\ > i" i, z ~,,..,.. g "~ ~ "°' ,. SC !~~ ~ f8 oQ ~ .,, s, ~> z i s, ~g " 0 ! ~~ ,., .. ;ii ~$ C z ' o• !!1~ ~!:~ ••• 0 . " ::::l ' ' QS ~-~~~ o, ~~ Ir ~ ,, ~ z ~~ ~5. ~ 'i1 ;;':: ... ~ ~~ i~ § H!i;i ~ ; Cl n ~~ii ~ .. CQ 2-!! ;E ~~~~ g .,, " ~ > "'! ~ , Ills !IIPI i i z ' ""I •• ,z ' ;;;~ ;' "' Ii ~~-I:, 1!9 z ~aE~ 0 ~Q!:i ~~;.. 0 ~ ~! -n ii• , , E "' ii! i,i , ~ ! · .. / / .. , . ' '·.-:~. ' • ~ I I ' 11 !!II w lPPl ~~ .... -~-= ..... ' ; I · . .._·· ..... ·--.,>,~. klll'OTI.U•"l"IIIOM ...... .._,~.., ----~ ..... .....,,._,..,._ = ~ • ·-·· . ,, 111 !111!11! 11m1111m111m ! s; ,z 1~ ~i ·,J~~~ ~~i =~a~i iif~~ I ::! ' !j 1.,1!),1•,iljl!'!1im !I•• I • ll~ i ~~~c11~ I nH~o ~, ! ti I I t~•sii~g·E~!~ 5~u:s op l z I i !lj,ij1i!l11111'11,i1 !sj,i 0 , ,'.11,,ir I ii ii, ,1,11 ---l m 1 11111m:11 1111 iii! !i'i V> , ,! ·"1' 1!!1-' j'I !i l 0 i i 1h !,ii !Ii! 1h! 1111 " ' l ! ,, !1th•', i1, '! I r , 1 1 il ih 1j'1li •l!1 •II I " 1 I l ,, ,•·l !•II iji ! I -:::; . 11 Iii• I !i h!! Ii ! ' 1 I I I! if 1! 1 j' 11 i 0 ' SPRINGBROOK RIDGE LANDSCAPE PLAN --- C/0 BAYLIS ARCHITECTS SR 51 S (BENSON DRIVE) AND BENSON ROAD RENTON, WA :, ..,, , rr, ) a, , • N • • N 1 c:::> , c:::> c.o lil < .,, s: n z l i! ::::! l! z Cl V, .,, m Q .,, 8 0 z V, QC> 0 ~ [:;; 'o Qi!) . ~~ f m~·1 1EB 0:'l: ' /'!• ' @:s -nm I I 'l /,:; ill~ f '1 ~,, ' ~ 111· oS: ri Ii,,! !111 zZ Wj~f ·11~~ z o .. o ~ ~~ 7. "T1 "' .. • ~ u w l::>Pi\ . '"~ -- !! 'I h ,1 i l ! ! l ' -------------·-- SPRINGBROOK RIDGE LANDSCAPE PLAN C/0 BAYLIS ARCHITECTS SR515 (BENSON DRNE)AND BENSON ROAD RENTON, WA " V, 9 -I ~ :;u " ~ " Q 3: " OJ C ~'~ ' ", ''·.-. 11i1111i1ji6 a§ a n 1/---t 11lp'1!1!i[Jl 111 1!11 Ii ~ r11h 11 !E;ffi ! Ii 1 1 m 'II!::! l I · !n1a .q I>( ~ 11, ! !~11181 i I :0 ,, §~ ! m l'T1 n CD 03: I . .m -,,m ! ~ i°"I :Jl ~ ', i -rn~ ~ j:;: i ii1 ,!1 < N ! m N ~S: 0'3 I j·, ' Q 0 $ l/ ~ C Q .,, <- <.O zi w ~PPi ~ z ·---·-u I 1 i i [ ! 11 ' 3111,!~ 0 oi'• ~ ·1!1lig ' ' St.e'1TT...UI- ,.,, ... -~ti, '"""' ==• i l • Ii il SPRINGBROOK RIDGE < ~ STREAM BUFFER AVERAGING & ENHANCEMENT PLAN-~-! ~ ~ QO BAYLIS ARCHITECTS ~. , H SR 515 (BENSON ORNE) A RENTON. lf D 3 ~~ I! ' CJ) 1J ;:o -z G) CD ::0 0 0 ~ ::0 -0 G) fTI CD C ,, ,, fTI ;:a ~ fTI ::0 > G) -z G) R> fTI z :I > z () fTI s: fTI z -I 1J > z fi'i X ~ l=I 00 l=I =I .... U'I :0 "Tl m m 0 CD m < ,,.., m "' C ~ • :r ~ =i ; C) ~~ " -0 z "'C > z :::! z C) "'C > z ' 111111111 h,,,I, ! ' I ! [] "' ! ~~ C ~~ -n -n ,! m I! ;,, z (! -n I i ! ;= ~ Cl r 11 11111 l' l '-0 ' ! l l i;: ! u ,, p n i~ I ,~ I (l OI !1!!!111 !! i lm io l11j'i! ! iC " l ,r 1 im 1 ' ' iUUiU u ; :: :: :: :: ; :;; c; c; ~ :; j m >< :i:: 1-1 "' l=I --1 .... en ~ < 0 .,, Qpl n l'T1 :;!~ ') co 03:: n -"Tlm -...., iil~ .. .. ~,, ri ...., c::, oS:: ' c::, (,0 z~ 7 L; 3: =i Cl ~ 0 z --cJ s;: z z 0 ----j m y, --cJ s;: z ::! z C) V1 ' --cJ '' -., "1~~,1-~~~-'- m Q l ' -n n ~ 0 z ·"' !1<' 0 m ~ ,- V1 (o) '" 'c h I rn a " ~ ~ ~ r iifu· ! :1 I , f \ , ,111~ I ~' ii !; i • ~h; '''! 111! O' -. ii "TI SI " ~ ~ w ~pp~ , __ , _____ SPRINGBROOK RIDGE STREAM BUFFER AVERAGING & ENHANCEMENT PLAN C/0 BAYLIS ARCHrrECTS SR 515 (BENSON DRJVE}AND BENSON ROAD RENTON, WA a Ii :1:@- ! • i~ i I I I·' ' '1 j I. I ' ' PRELIMINARY-NOfFOR CONSTRUCl/ON ! I ! I \.) t i !' !l!!i jl ~ SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PlANNEO URBAN DEVELOPMENT STREAM CROSSING CULVERT EXHIBIT :lJ rn n m -< rn 0 Q m < 3: Q[.D > ~~ :::0 o;;;: N Tim :u~ _,,_ m N ~"U = 0~ c~ to zZ z ;i!' G) =• d Ci) Ci) 9 • • 0 m < XJ ,, §5 n m "" ") a:, Ol:: n -"Tim ::: "" iR~ ._ ~"" n "' = oli: :::, = u, zZ z 7. ~) ~ 0 !I! ,----"' i'' ------ ' '~-~ -----:. ---_ _;-----~ liifi I:,, '11 PRELIMINARY PtANNEO URBAN DEVELOPMENT I 'Ill 1·11 -' l j I I -' --j 1,m,o--1 1,~t-tt __:i-11-----l SPRINGBROOK RIDGE RENTON WASHINGTON I'-, It '"j i ~ C: ~: ~ y m ):( © l :!: -. l=I 00 1-1 ' =l I IY ' 0 I ~ l - I 1 i ' I ~ ; ' ~ 2i: ;;"' ~ "" \ :0 ,, ~ © m m 0 a, 0 m -,, • -....., :n < rn m ....., ~~ c::, 5 C c::, u:, zZ 0 ~ > • i a rlf' "b ',, )'.J ~ ! 11 I : p11 PRELIMINARY PLANNED l 11 URBAN DEVELOPMENT : I • h'l'! SPRINGBROOK RIDGE !!Jlljl .,,1 , 1 . 11111 1 ;1 1. ! Jill' i I ,, Ii RENTON WASHINGTON ---------·--·-,-·-·--· ... • ~ ~ ~· ~' ~~· <-<. :J:J 12m <S • ..,, r ""' m :;!O D. IT1 -. Q n co ~*i I m --...., ill~ rii N ~--c::, o> ii 0 ~ zZ ~)> p i PRELIMINARY PtANNED ~ .... i'I' URBAN DEVELOPMENT ,,,, 0 I jl w • 11p " I I • i,J -r- 1 I +------' I : ! I > I I I I I 1--- I . ' . l l l ; • i ! I , SPRINGBROOK RIDGE RENTON WASHINGTON 11~! ~ .. 1 r I r!:i!!J ~ CJ §5 'Tl n rr, .,, ") CD o;:: ,im n -ill~ .. N ,.. ... g ~.,, n o> ::, <D zZ z ~ l•l -----------·-·-- " " i ' i I I I i )> H ~ ~ 5~ PRELIMINARY PLANNED 0. URBAN DEVELOPMENT .I>, . .. n11 i l.J . q (,; rn IF~! SPRINGBROOK RIDGE I II RENTON WASHINGTON ~ < :IJ Qm m .,, ~~ rr, n a, 03: m -,im -"' ~~ c:: m ,..._, ~ ... = or;; 0 = u:, z2 ;i: LJ -----·~------~·-·---~--... / > ' I ~ ~ I c' ~ --. ~ ~ -! ; ~ ~ ~ 0 • 0 V, r·:>· ~ -~~6 ~,E!, ~ ---,i., w, e,,lr l I I • ,;,:; I f{! ( I ' • ' .. •.-: . ' I ,',,' i I iJ.;. I ,, '------ ' • I L i i 1' 4-'--,- ~ , -. PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT __ /··'-"v· -', ·_·,,, ,<>. "'· ' I I I I I I I I I I " 1 ' ' l ~. ii!! "11 -. ... ?_._.,/" --- I I I H-H-11 Ir~ lll1l j!tltil SPRINGBROOK RIDGE ;111 II • • llhli! I: !ii' I i • I RENTON WASHINGTON ,, I Ii i ' ' p I " ' fi'I )( ::!:: l=I CiJ 1-=4 -I N ~ i . [I: r. -. @ -. "' pj ;,: ;,,, ~ c' 6 :0 .,, Q ~ m IT1 ~~8 0 a, 03: ~ m --nm ~ "" ill~ g "' ~-,, ~ Q Os;; C fa ;n;~ zZ 8~::: z ,zm z )> ,og L> -i•o 0 ~z ~ V, r----------• ~I ,, ~ ~ ii -e i Iii[! p ,1 -11 I I ; ( ·1· It ' ' ' L_ r-----, r-----, ~-~~1ffrmH:: .. 111 -,--,->-- '"""''°"""""""'"" ·--, ' ' ' ' ' ' !,!i ll : ! n : ,---, e l a --" : ..... ,, ...... = ---........ ' ..... ,---sr-_j ! -. ~· Ii~ ' C r ' ' ' L_ PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT jl! """': ',,..,' !ill 1'11 i I • i,,.i --, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' __ J ' ' SPRINGBROOK RIDGE RENTON WAf.HINGTON ~ ;,; I -:s ~ Q ~ --i ,,g -< 8 ~ ~ ' ' ,-1; T r· -" -. - L _1 ® nlDil II:,~ ' ' -. _.) .----__ i! ___ --:: _____ :: ----·---~-- ::~ ' ' ' ' ' ··1.----, : ' DO DD ' ' r:: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I~.: ... 1 ("" ''-.j : OD OD 0 0-"', '1111 ---., ' ' ' ' ,. •I i' ' ' ' ' 1"' ' ' ' ' ' ' --~------n------y·· l FR ~ O~;'-=-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___J 2 ''"'j l 'Ill l!Jl'II Zz 58r,~ !,II rill ~ ~ • PRELIMINARY PLANNED SPRINGBROOK RIDGE '1'1!11,;1 I· i ~)> ~ ~ j 1m1 URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1\1 ~ II 0 Q ! 1'! l RENTON WASHINGTON Ii g 0\ I ;,. ~ il lil lJ ;:; 'Tl o,.,.. ,TI IT1 ~~ :") to Oil: 11 'T1m -...., illl ==: T1 ...., asi: :, § <D zl r i i I -------·-"-""'-·-·---·- 1· I I I I I I I I I I I L ~ I c' ~ i ,~ )> ... 0 --1 . , I --- ' z 0 i} I , i~ gc • ') ~~ ~ s:' ji 1 ' ; ~ ,1 r"i , ;I . " ' [ m i . , . ,; ( , r~ r r--, .r ~ ' I PRELIMINARY PLANNED UR.RAN DEVELOPMENT • .! I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE RENTON WASHINGTON ....,._,.__.. ___ .......... ._.....,..._._._ --.. I q I ~ I PREUMIN.AAY PLANNED I 11 t I UMAN DEVELOPMENT I 1 • ..1 SPRINGBROOK RIDGE l~lt ~ RENTON WASHINGTON I I ~ . q . Q PRELIMINARY PLANNED I 11 1 t URBAN DEVELOPMENT r , 1.J 1 111 -·· SPRINGBROOK RIDGE I{ I~ RENTON WASHINGTON I ~ r-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I -:--: ~ ~ ll > ~ 0 ...., z ~ m s < .. ~ s; 2· i i'fl .,,, ! ti I I • q PREUMINAAY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT I II It II I . , • ..I SPRINGBROOK RIDGE RENTON WASHINGTON