Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRezone File No 471-68LO N fi a an u s va g y 10 MA N U S wi yp FA V oN ew r T A oO Vi v 40 AY W Ki t n i di f ZL ie LO 145 HLQs j IS AISe- pe . n | : gS Os STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFULMED. DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. 1QP! STOP STOP STOP’ STOP pS) © i I © ee <a © = SO, HEARING RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD PY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON JULY 15, 1968 AT 8:00 P.M, TO CONSIDER AN DENXKKEDOMXROR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF M. CAYFORD AND A. HUSELAND, APPL. NO. Ry7 1-68; REZONE FROM G AND Ge6000 TO RmZ3 PROPERTY LOCATED ON LAKE WASH. BLVD. BETWEEN S.E. QIST PL. AND S.E. 9IST ST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: lots h, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block lL, C.D. Hillmants Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. I, according to plat thereof recorded [n Volume II of plats, page 6%, records of King County, Washingtono ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID APPEAL ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 15, 1968 AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECT~ ION TO SAME. CITY ,OF RENTON af #0, )’# PE bevel bE al A HELMIE W. NELSON, CITY CLERK BAT EOCDOPUBIE TORTI RK CERT LP fC A TT ON I, Lecnes Moor. Hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above and one ccpy posted at the City Hall, Renton Washington on Juxx I% \oegas prescribed by law. siewsp: A pz fe Th . Supecp bed and sworn to before me this _//% day of Vee bap fy rf 19 gf es 2 ee) J aA DAES wg: ‘Ad de rd a ae ae a, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton, Wash. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK +« RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ¢ ALPINE 5-3464 July 29, 1968 Mr. Bruce Mahler, Land & Tax Agent King County Assessor's Office County Court House, Room 201 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Sir: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance No, 2419 changing the zoning of certain properties within the City of Renton, as passed and approved on this “272 day of July 1968 ‘ Very truly yours, Helmie W. Nelson. City Clerk HWN/h Enclosure (1) : fLewse bpd < C-Yhed cory ORDINANCE NO, 2 fz 17 by AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CIASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) and (G-6000) TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R=2) and (R=3) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV, (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the “Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) and (G-6000); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about May 28, 1968, which petition was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 26, 1968, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and Petitioners having appealed from the decision of said Planning Commission and said matter having come on for hearing before the City Council on or about July 15, 1968, after due notice as provided by law, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, and Petitioners having duly amended said Petition, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS 3 SECTION I: The following described properties in the City of Renton are hereby rezoned to Residential District as hereinbelow specified; the City Engineer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: A, Rezoned to Residential District (R-2): Lot 4, Block 4, C. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1 according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63, records of King County, Washington, B, Rezoned to Residential District (R-3): Lots 5, 6, 7 & 8, Block 4, C. D, Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden "Addition to Seattle No, i, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 65, records of King County, Washington, (property located on Lake Wash, Blvd. between SE Gist Pl. and SE @ist St.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication, He lmié APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 22nd day o Approved as to form: Gerard M, Shellan, eae Attorne Date of Publication: JUL 2 6 190i JUL 2 8 196 l; July 10, 1968 gy Helmie Nelson, City Clezx Rss 104, City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Re: M. Cayford ana A. Huseland, Appi. No. R-471-08; cezone from G und G-6000 to keo; property located on Lx. Vash. Blvd. between SE vist Pl. and SE vist St. Deur Mr. Nelson: I am writing this letter concerning the rezoning applicsationof M. Cayford and A. Huseland to build apartments on property between SE 91st Pl. and SE 9let St. If such epartments were to be built the value of our land wevld be conciderably lowered and cur view completely ovestructed. Because this would also affect the other homes in the surrounding area, the home- cwners sh.re our view points. Thus, we do not approve of such 4 project. Thank You .- 7a) ait if _/ Av hs eLeehens. fir. &@&nd Mrs. G. Bell CB/cb INTER-OFFICE MEMO mate: |9 Soin I19GS TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk FROM: Jack wilson, City Engineer RE: CAstFoETcwW- + 9 a FE I hereby certify that the legal description contained in the attached — a fant F=7 SED . CS Sons | of the _[—h2 S65) a > Se property is correct. City Engineer oa acai Bie SS MOTTCE OF PUB LIC HEAR ING RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY EALL, RENTON, ON JULY 15, 1968 AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER AN PEXKERDOMXERR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF M. CAYFORD AND A. HUSELAND, APPL. NO. Reli7 1-683 REZONE FROM G AND Ge6000 TO R»3 3 PROPERTY LOCATED ON LAKE WASH. BLVD. BETWEEN S.E. 9IST PL. AND S.E. QIST ST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block 1, C.D. Hillmants Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume IIL of plats, page 63, records of King County, Washingtono ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID APPEAL ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 15, 1968 AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECT~ ION TO SAME. CITY, OF RENTON | Ly aie Was bee: x4 Bs esi A we L HELMIE W. NELSON, CITY CLERK BALEOGROPUBELOR EIGN CERTIFICATION Ieuexcmeas Hour. Hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in tree conspicuous places on the property described above and one ccpy posted at the City Hall, Renton Washington on Jor {%, \9@6as prescribed by law. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ve ay of al ta f— 19 yf. , oe L ~ ff 3 Z AL Mea Ks" "en aalt jidtaryw Pub¥ic in and for the State of “Va Sing yt; Gresiding at Renton, Wash. ‘ ele = "79" ° 4° a “7 te Pp cos a July 12, 1968 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington Re: Rezone Denial Appeal M. Cayford and A. Huseland, Appl. No. R-471-68 Rezone from G and G-6000 to R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 9lst Pl. and S.E. 9lst St. (Kennydale area) Gentlemen: The rezone request of M, Cayford and A. Huseland as noted above was considered by the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of June 26, 1968, The property in question has the following gen- eral characteristics: Total Area--29,700 sq. ft. * Existing Zoning--G and G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--Lake Washington Blvd., S.E. 9lst St., S.E. 9ist: Pl. Proposed Use--multi-~family residential Comprehensive Plan--low to medium density multi-family residential on existing Plan; single family residential on revised Plan The area in question has been under study by the Planning Commis- sion on various occasions during the formulation of the revised Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Huseland has also submitted several let- ters to the Commission regarding his proposed use in relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission, in the course of its study of the area, has conducted field trips to review the land in question and to review the area on a comprehensive basis. Considerable discussion also has taken place regarding feasibility of multiple use adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard. Consider- able time has also been given to the matter of sewers in the area and the impact of multiple use on the adjacent single family resi- dential areas. During the course of discussion at the Planning Commission public’ hearing, the feasibility of a lesser multiple zoning was dis- cussed, The applicant, Mr. Huseland, indicated however that any Mayor and City Council July 12, 1968 : Page 2 lesser zoning was not acceptable to him and would not be considered, The Planning Commission upon completion of its discussion with the applicant and the opponents voted to deny the rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The request is not in agreement with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Sewers are not now presently available, 3. Such rezone would have a very definite detrimental effect on adjacent properties, At the Planning Commission Administrative meeting of July 10, 1968 the matter of the Cayford-Huseland rezone denial appeal was dis- cussed in view of communicating to the City Council the basis for ‘the Planning Commission decision. The Commission at this time — voted to recommend to the City Council that the highest and best use for the property in question would be that allowed under the R-2 zone, It was the feeling of the majority of the Commission “members that the R-2 zone would allow the Commission adequate | controls to alleviate some of the problems and the detrimental effects on the adjacent properties. Very truly yours, Gordon Y, Ericksen Planning Director Genvlemens ipaninously veted . in im 4 side en) ny ee oe ee ‘ LOUVOPLGS “Gul t, the duly 1Ota meeting o: me khennydale Community olub, Ss . Ps ot ee land«Cayirs 16 huseld omy att ay nw. A Whean Sep ad On Sha Gali woh sas eit RO SIL Aces Cu ' 3 g a a As ACY a - HawnTr 1 Ouse wick 4 e . : + wD tat TH ele snaay Baye ptrne 4 Le rt) OF oem fi 2iOay Ml lO Chix ad whe PE d ne era faa: ne on ee Oak Fa bimoee UL i Cwe g ‘ LPs fa BAP aTA as ante 1 <oseN ns eg a ai Be a 15) eS 7 x F “7 FAA AN ; ee > ere 3 zonod var 2 ic dale wash, “4 de jon, LY t "3 i ig CGLS West OL ALY iis 58 4 ON S LOLS 5 (only house t ance 4 c = ; ; ) Oo Le ) Cc ae. alls 1 a 2 DU. we CEL S oe ~ tar hs a fe GA l 3 0 2 y = ha ta r k e t r 2. Er 7 B9 S t In e Os he ha a r te d L/ Me e e An FS S ae Fe e ; AT e s L i e r w ha f oa Le c m y t Se le k 7h Ce ag ay ee c e l l - oY ea t e n FP t- LI S ef a e r t y re oo ee e og Z 1 fa t Le , P At l Me SH Ce o AY V4 Ce lh y Pe g t e ? Le l a as Se he s bo f Y ac k i i l e /0 2 ik e py BS IE FA he l e a) 25 ) " q\ | a4 ac w e d l l . . a mn ra ‘ : G se e m Le l e ; $- BE B Bh ee ba l a, De - I) H BS “O Q : N o a we n ma 4 - 4 gp J S o G fy i e e a , { 27 oy an n a we p 3 Pe g a . to o n le Cl t e t ve e Ph » Pi d : EC A aL al l , ¢ go r e t i a f HT K 02 QC . ee He t i l wa r a 7 C2 2 ! PE av t d e Po e " ee e tu EA { CG R e wP l dt he PI L E he | oN | Ne og 7 ee IS eae IAYLE %, \N — ZC TF 4 13 | | S6 6 th Ci r e SE : C7 7 Ai a a “7 p , aS hi g wa d e . a fo r y a A te r t ra a c t u l l a ee C > Wo © ae © f° D Ex e r t i l Cv s , gi e s fe sa th bo w s S, o . fo se l e n y GF E ul e a “>? ae a en a a a ala 3 ie ue Chee ee BQ)? . oy fom as (a oh 17 2? fe ) | Me» Dowace Coster, Moyert Jvw Tite! Cry (as wart - TB ot reed (4 ASA. Re: ee Coy Zeer + i Posexnun, Kerene From © + beta G R-3 an Ad¢Aariz.D Ox Le Gall, EF: to, Bare Siti SA GL . ‘ : io. . S \o) Terr , Pm : iy a Ein tlt yy ot nd — ‘ t_fom_ Diaweride THIS Aerrea 73 Jes. kee YEST Ue, kis GAAD Ze {#2 i BEM &, hy pe CTA _ Me ib Are o A iews, - / mn S, C2 gv VE Ci vl Ce Aid TAL fz ca aibal & Le pr Ale, Ss | Khvisweo ruls Freresae uo Mave _beseorsa jr. ; ws JEL Md, Ay kez CALE , Sori _@f KM of Nese AB CHS fi Ve? Mey 36/2 Have Woeueo ano oven rue hase yeae flav A Hace Ze Gar Sewans Se Ove Osean pio plier a Finnie SvCt@sogo Lal Garde £1 Snase VPEL, aS f Go Geone curt 08, Feb THeesn Tha Cost cope Le 7 | Cow SiD BCAA ws Heke THAW THe 2 Ves dh OL _ke EPS AC Cart GH tar BS (a ririewep Down 8y phe LOH BOE A (e PY OCI MEGS | AS L40ed + ; CH DORIA G I f28 PBT Sevarvis CF One et belts oF _ THEA ty HOH SiGe vO? HOE Ove A (PAI CAATS. —_ oe a , 4 Brent Gq Ov KK2A wo « (i _ f/r_ fs OVA Rim Ceweeed Te _ - — ‘ eo / iy rasa P : serine ; up Fe er _Savirarvod Conarriens Se ee ____ aS ; , a“ © ee 4 _ Hay _ Geico _ Ato. LOVE NTL ALY, _Beive TH [F228 ep re tf ue is (> - . ‘ 4 2 4 een SAT Kegineuree FIRE A, ee x™ eepsyyi a co) ‘ ‘ F i / TPS PI20 PCOSEO - Bux De ad @ CU Mer of Dit COTES 6 j : — , ae i own P Uf JUTE... | Cyl ve 2 ede « Cousin, fais LIF BAT be 19. LL were Duserey Sz HLAO TH 22 Boe rad & S {Te , Jal Fs oar 0n ; 17 Wweven Le rpsan LO VILE TH AY SE 4A - Mca 7 | _e ALGE fier Ae LV Cat As THIS WE Ry To | Ge ke- 2 cere =) Weed fe i Bp Fe2d20 Fo Comsiotr THLE S449 2 Carved aw Vs S Ax Even TU Ae CUTLOEE.. . . : ; a ) THoS? of Of tutes Navt (worKto ~rtnk THE S2 coxa ban Have Fisap To Manriy) ove Jdowiost. flbro2s irae Ha VE ae Z ows Ce, | Fp P kc 10 € pf a G A 2/4 CF _ ay, GA ~ LAU Beet © aris THE A ren has 4A lL 0 92 1A a Os dh & [AAW Or LAKE by ASH IM real ™ Hezne Oe /s al male op aeru Cased, aa Zoe __t GHA LIL Movs 7ALdd S oa #F #8 -— Tol fy OfY tl Oot 4A Des RAB? Pot Sank — dhe ete wd, Momus oO seve p Cen ACNE 7. S22 77 Onl A412 Te fF Jo it, LEC A \ ey | hanes Comper._—te Ge Cousrneerea Near Ry Sombork Lit Oor Of 7Hea hea, fluo fen TRE View Aun a « - P é « Lescrey thn WesieAgn Freeer ef Oven C. CLD ITY 1 rHenerene Sic SI Mi. La Lf Ott BAD @Qearnemen a ; . 7 . “4 G@/ 7H2 Ory i Ub Ge _ y 4% FOcele? SHE Va, (i Ona 71S SO S _ ee. ? Ft? pe a) se Kebey mano ArleW A. MO Kegeer_ _ wae (23 ke 26S cat & “TOP CSAC + oe a _ coe LD AUEE La Kieyida? Sr, peer COCA i f a f* 1 . C ed Ai teal Ayiy 5 fee CECE ~\ HEINEY BAL rae - , fl , + ra be = Soa A ae SR AY AO AE ESSA ke Os Fh A, Saeed aaa Ce A, GC ae oa GONG LEO EHEC. TP OOBH tere oD _ herthimn. Wiehe, (Ka wren , Uths . - SS ee a EF ony rh SO 7 oo Chore snieee No _. . ee ee SH SE Ke rm OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK « RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 » ALPINE 5-3464 Ju ly 9; 1968 Sa RF capita © Rez: M. Cayford and A. Huseland, Appl. Noo R=ly71-68; rezone from G and G-6000 to R=3; property located on Lk, Wash. Blvd. between SE 9ist Pl. and SE QIst St, To Whom it May Concern: You are hereby notified that the Renton City Council has set the date of July 15, 1968 In the City Council Chambers, City Hall at 8:CO p.m, as time and place for Public Hearing on appeal by M, Cayford and A. Huseland abovescaptioned rezone applicaticn. You are invited to attend this meeting and be heard for or against the matter. Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON Helmie We. Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk cc: Planning Department ~hpalie Lb! (O72 Ve C Whe Mithitrgr Peel Z/), ad fi Thy os ‘i Lf eu CE 7 Y Sy) BO id t 0 7. (Lele J be [necked Renton, Wash, June 28, 1968. Honorable Mayor Custer: I wish to make a protest regarding Richard Stredicke's and Dayle E, Garrison's action as members of the Planning Commission at their open meeting on June 26th and also their action at a City Council meeting earlier when the new comprehensive plan was discussed. Mr. Stredicke and Mr. Garrison did everything possible to influence the other members of the Planning Commission with Mr. Stredicke's facts of questionable validity and Mr. Garrison's straying from Robert's Rules of Order to reject the R3 zoning of the Lawrence and Huseland property in Kennydale. Several members of the Planning Commission spoke in favor of the rezoning. Mr. Stredicke made a motion to reject the R3 zoning first on the Huseland, Cayford property and later on the Lawrence property for the following reasons: 1. Not in agreement with the intent o Comprehensive plan . Answer. We are at this time dealing with the present comprehensive plan, which is multi family, medium density or R 3 zoning. 2. Sewers not presently availabe. Answer. They will be availabe shortly on the Huselan/Cayford property and the buyer of the Lawrence property acknowledges that he cannot obtain a building permit until sewers are availdhbée. A covenant to this effect could be attached to the R3 zonine, I am spelling this out even though sewers are not an issue in rezoning. 3. Such zoning would be detrimental to the area. Answer. Thereare businesses and apartments in the direct vicinity of the Huseland Cayford property and across the street from the Lawrence property there is a gas station and on the opposite corner there is business zoned property. There is also a three story avartment building just beyond the gas station. These two business areas in Kennydale should be treated as any other business corner in the city of Renton. A three‘story building would enhance the area and not in ant} way be detrimental. It would upgrade the business area there and provide a buffer between the business and residential area. There were no complaints from the audience regarding the Lawrence property except lack of sewers. The property is bounded by S. E. 9th on the north, 1chth SE. on the east, a fifteen foot alley on the south and a private residence on the west. The purchascr of the Lawrence property agrees to provide for a shrub or fence screening between the Lawrence properhy and the private residence on the weste This too, covld be a, covenant attached to the R3 zoning. The purenen er is interested’ R3 zoning -Floyd and Della Lawrence are'nt getting any younger and if they are to enjoy the proceeds from their ppoverty it must be now when TI have a sale on ite The same is true of the Huselands. After Mr. Stredicke made the motion_to reject the rezoning a Uisedand property, a member of the Blanni tic Commission told M a) a <) edicke’ that two of the reasons he gave were untrue. Mr. Garrison immediately called for a vote. It certainly was'nt clear to me if it passed or not and I have excellent hearing and I was sitting in the front row.The same menber of the Planning Commission asked for a roll call vote but Mr. Garrison told him it was too late to ask for a roll call vote although it was immediately after the vote. Mr. Garrison said that the rezoning’ was rejected anyway as he was going to vote against the rezonirg I believe Mr. Garrison strayed from Roberts Rules of order by not allowing a roll call vote and as Chairman of the Planning Commission he votes if bv ballot but not after the count starts and in all cases where his vote would change the result. The result here was unclear and he should not have voted vnless it was a tie.Mr. Stredicke made the same motion on the Lawrence powperty and it too was rejected for the same reasons. It appeared to me that Mr. Stredicke and Mr. Garrison showed that either they had no knowledge of what was best for the area or the property owrers or they could'nt care less or that they were acting in a prejudicial manner. The decision i believe was capricious, arbitrary, unreasonable and as I will prove discrimitory. On the Holcomb property on Sunset Blv. between 132nd SE and 1388. E. the Planning Commission granted R3 zoning although they covld have rejected it for two of the same reasons and correctly so,that they used on the Huseland Cayford and the “lawrence ppoperty. On the present comprehensive plan it is not multi family, medium densitywhich the Kennydale property is. Also three story buildings could be detrimental to the area. The Holcomb speaker wants R3 zoning although he said he was going to build one and two story buildings. He also said he covld put many more apartments on the property with R3 zoning. He had a picture of a one and two story building. How binding is a picture after he receives the R3 zoning? My next protest regarding Mr. Stredicke and Mr. Garrison was their action at the RentaN City Council meeting recently when the council was discussing the new comprehensive plan. The Chairman called for a vote on the green belt near the Barbee mill in Kennydale. I heard and saw Mr. Stredicke and Mr. Garrison both vote on the issue along with the councilmen. In fact because of this a roll call vote was asked and permission granted as some one in the audience was heard to vote. They were not identified but I am sure they knew who they were. It seemed to me that Mr. Stredicke and Mr. Garrison were behaving in a very immature and irresponsible manner as the council was voting on a legislative matter. Some of the members of the Planning Commission were thoughtful and working in the best interest of the Renton area. Some I thought acted in a high handed manner typical of some of the black cuttain countries. If it was'nt for the Real Estate business, the Investers, and the Builders, Renton would be a ghost town. As Lord Samuel said, and I quote,''Nothing is so dangerous as wrong headed efficiency.''! It is long past due all over the United States that we have fair dealings in zoning and all other matters for all of the people. - Thank you for bearing with me so long but I just could'nt stand idly by and see total disregard for some people and their a lal te Tose PArne Pe TOroek i sores va ws 2 Approved @ Sincerely yours, ; : fe ‘ Pa c ‘ we = ge ee rl % al wehbe” YE bree - 1 £ Xie ye Rn e & he pel , oe ' : 2 SITS Lauvsverce ANeS AugeLanr? , /7 \ VINA. Base lL Any ZONING AP. aL by M, 4, CAYFCORD and 4M 8, HUSZLAND Wi lode Honorable Mayor, oe of Council, Members of Pla nn g Commission, City of Renton Gentlemen: — larérg poly LS GO ¥ Por. — We, the undersigned, wish to appeal the decision of the Renton Planning Commission of June 26, 1968, when said commission rejected the following request: Cayford, M. and Huseland, A: Application No. R 471-66; rezone from G and G-6000 to R33 Property located on Lake Washington Blvd., be- tween S.E. 9lst Pl. and S.E. 9lst St., legally described as Lots 4 555 6, 7 and 8, Block 4, C. D. Hillmans Lake washington Garden of Eden, bivis- on # Ls (9140 Lake Washington Blvd., Renton, wash.) We are making this application under the existing land use as per Renton City Ordinance which permits multiple housing in this area, Applicant owner (Huseland) ef Lots 7 & & would remind you that when this property was in the county, it w as zoned B-l, We were verbally assured by city officials that zoning would not be taken from property own- ers when annexed and on that basis, Huselands actively worked for annex- ation, It was further, later stated by city officials, that heretofore, zoning has not been taken away from those who had it in the county. fThere- fore, we are not asking for special favors, but for a portion of zoning authorized in the county. What the undersigned want, and are asking for (4-3), is the same as has been granted to adjacent property owners to the south, that is The Kennydale Market, the former Kennydale Post Office Property and the appartments south of and ae Je EE the Kennydale Market. There is also another store at the corner of S.H. 91st Pl. and 100th Ave. S.E. and a railroad is across the Blvd., and our request is within keeping of the surrounding area which for years has comprised the "Business Center” in the community known as Kennydale. Also K-3 will serve as a buffer between business and residential areas. Applicant ewner of Lot 4 (Cayford) of the upper east corner, agrees no buildings should be placed on this lot and will gladly accept whatever zoning will permit parking on said lot. (4) Rezoning to R-3, allewing apartments on this preperty will def- initely upgrade the vicinity tremendously, as at present it is underdev eloped and unimproved except for a couple of cabins which would be removed, In the motion (at Planning Commission) to reject this application, a principal objection was, "Sewers are not now available." nasmuch as this property is within the boundary of LID # 258 and the City Council had already awarded to king Construction Company, a contract to install sewers in LID # 258, we do not feel this is a proper objection, it is understood and agreed all construction would be made accord- ing to city codes and building requirements and with principal access and parking to be from &.E. 9lst Pl. and S.E. 9lst Et., by the existing 12! platted alley and Lot 4 on the Hast, thus avoiding traffic problems en Lake washington Bivd. We respectfully request that the Renton Council grant R-3 Zoning on the property herein described. M. in ayford Ly Relea, ee (haat rey, June 28, 1 (amos E,. Huseland, 10410-11léth Ave. S.&, fenton, Washi ington \ : pel ih nted Mnaclanrt lp OM Crenecd rnenLer_o APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. (C-Ut\- &$ Plan. Com. Action eaves lo- 26-64 Receipt No. AADU L205 San? okal Appeal Filed lo -2%-&% Filing Date 5-2% -&¢ City Council Action Hearing Date L.2i-i% Ordinance No. §& Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: mo}, Morris He Cayford ani 16640 N.E. 85th, Redmond, Wash.( TU-5~1997) ani Name 4g Huseland Address 10410-116th Ave. S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone No. RANGHEGHD BA=-6-8689 __ Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Lake Washington Blvd between _¢ 8, olst Pl. (corner) and SE. 91st ae Total square footage in property 14 443,8 (Huseland); 16.070 (Cayfoid) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Y ae are : 7 aR XK SF CKEBAKXRAWHX KD ‘@ ate ae or re SS a ee BO > 5 oF AS Le, OQ C) ror cor > + Lot 6, 5 i an's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Ac to plat thereof recorded in a ll of plats, page 63, records of said-—eounty. Kung Conky, Wash tng ™M Existing Zoning nan A G-&\o000 Zoning Requested Ro3 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Apartment Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on property? Number required gg required by code NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional infor- mation you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific requirements). 1. In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? Xpanding population, especially close —____to Renton Boeings. 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? wis o get near ke Washington Bathin __ Beaches and Lake View, which would be available at this location, 3. What provision will you make to protect adjacent and surrounding properties from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? Ample off street parking planned on Lot 4, This lot will be fenced in ; ar) as ya Renton Planning Dept. 1967 ZONING API L by M. H. CAYFORD and AM BE, iUSfLaND Honorable Mayor, Members of Council, Members of Planning Commission, City of Renton Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, wish to appeal the decision of the Renton Planning Commission of June 26, 1968, when said commission rejected the following request: Gayford, M. and Huseland, A: Application No. R 47168; rezone from G and Ge6000 to R33; Property located on Lake Washington Blvd., be= tween S.5. 9lst Pl. and S.E. 91st St., legally described as Lots 4,5,6, 7 and 8, Block 4, C. D. Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Divise ion # 1. (9140 Lake Washington Blvd., Renten, Wash.) We are making this application under the existing land use as per Renton City Ordinance which permits multiple housing in this area, Applicant owner (Huseland) of Lots 7 & 8 would remind you that when this property was in the county, it w as zoned Bel, We were verbally assured by city officials that zoning would not be taken from property owne ers when annexed and on that basis, Huselands actively worked for annexe ation, It was further, later stated by city officials, that heretofore, zoning has not been taken away from those who had it in the county. There» fore, we are not asking for special favors, but for a portion of zoning authorized in the county. | What the undersigned want, and are asking for (R-3), is the same as has been granted to adjacent property owners to the south, that is; The Kennydale Market, the former Kennydale Post Office Property and the appartments south of and adjoining the Kennydale Market. There is also another store at the corner of S.E, 91st Pl. and lOOth Ave. S.m, and a railroad is across the Blvd., and our request 1s within keeping of the . surrounding area which for years has comprised the "Business Center" in the community known as Kennydale, Also R»3 will serve as a buffer between business and residential areas. Applicant owner of Lot 4% (Cayford) of the upper east corner, agrees no buildings should be placed on this lot and will gladly accept whatever zoning will permit parking on said lot. (4) Rezoning to Re3, allowing apartments on this property will def- initely upgrade the vicinity tremendously, as at present it is underdeve eloped and unimproved except for a couple of cabins which would be removed, In the motion (at Planning Commission) to reject this application, a principal objection was, "Sewers are not now available," Inasmuch as this property is within the boundary of LID # 258 and the City Council had already awarded to King Construction Company, a contract to install sewers in LID # 258, we do not feel this is a proper objection. It is understood and agreed all construction would be made accords ing to city codes and building requirements and with principal access and parking to be from S.E. 91st Pl. and S.E. 91st St., by the existing 12! platted alley and Lot 4 on the East, thus avoiding traffic problems on Lake Washington Blvd, We respectfully request that the Renton Council grant Re3 Zoning on the property herein described. le tice oc Ct AOD CX “(Mo He. Cayford, 16d40/N.&. 85th, Redmond, Washington) 3 ‘4 4 j 966 a —_ Zz / June 28, 1968 / = Netao tt Pod ( T Ato eos mae A 4 (imos E. Huseland, 10%10-116th Ave. S.E. Renton, Washington oN Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26, 1968 Minutes Page 5 Stredicke stated that under R-3 zoning there is nothing legally the Commission can do to enforce screening to protect adjacent single family homes. He asked the applicant if he would consent to R-3 zoning with adequate legal protection for the single family areas to the north as to height of not more than two stories. The appli- cant stated he would post bond to this effect or execute restrictive covenants, whichever the Commission desired. As there were no further comments from Commissioners or the audience, it was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Ross, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY DENZER, THAT THE APPLICATION OF EDWARD A. HOLCOMB FOR REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-3 BE GRANTED AND FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL AS IT AGREES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman declared a brief recess at 9:50 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:00 P.M. All Commission members previously noted were present. ok (e) CAYFORD, M. AND HUSELAND, A., Appl. No. R-471-68; rezone from G and G-6000 to R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 9Ist Pl. and S.E. 91st St. The Chairman described the rezone application and stated that inasmuch as the Commission had visited the property several times and were familiar with it, they would dispense with showing of slides. Comments from the audience were invited. Mrs. Graham Bell, 9827 S.E. 91st Place, asked what the applicants intended to do with the property. She was advised that the zoning requested would permit construction of apartment buildings. She stated she was opposed to the rezone as such construction would block her view of Lake Washington. Mr. Amos Huseland, 10410 - 116th Ave. S.E., one of the applicants, spoke on behalf of the rezone request. He stated he owned two of the lots under consideration; that while in the county these two lots were zoned for business, and such zoning was lost when the property was annexed to Renton. Mr. Huseland stated an apartment development would upgrade the area and be more desirable than the modest rental dwellings now existing on the property. Upon inquiry, Mr. Huseland stated the property was annexed to the City early in 1960, but as sewers were not available, he did not request rezone prior to this time. It is his understanding that sewers will be available soon. Mr. M. Cayford, 16640 N.E. 85th, Redmond, applicant, also spoke on behalf of the rezone request. Mr. Jim Fawcett, 9003 - 100th Ave. S.E. stated he was opposed to the rezone as he did not want a three story apartment house in close proximity to his home. He stated he realized a single family home could be built to a height of 35 feet, just 5 feet less than an R-3 apartment house, but he said a single family home would not block the view like an apartment house could. Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26, 1968 Minutes Page 6 Mr. Huseland stated he would be willing to leave the area above the alley as single family or perhaps utilize this area for parking purposes. Stredicke stated that granting this rezone request would be opening the door for multiple use in this area, and he felt the Commission had already reviewed this area many times and felt it was suitable for single family rather than for multiple use. Ross stated he felt that granting this high a density on the prop- erty would subject the adjacent property owners to the east to possible depreciation of their properties. He stated further that perhaps the applicants would be willing to accept R-2 zoning on the property which would permit the Commission to exercise some control over its development as well as limit the height of buildings which most of the people in the audience seemed to object most to. Mr. Huseland stated he would not amend his application to R-2; that he felt the best use of the property was R-3 inasmuch as he had busi- ness use in the county for many years. As there were no further comments, it was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Ross, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unani- mously. ACTION: MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE REZONE REQUEST OF CAYFORD-HUSELAND FOR R-3 ZONING BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: (1) THE REQUEST IS NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE COMPRE- HENSIVE PLAN; (2) SEWERS ARE NOT NOW PRESENTLY AVAILABLE; AND (3) SUCH REZONE WOULD HAVE A VERY DEFINITE DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON AD- JACENT PROPERTY. Racanello stated he did not agree with the motion; that he felt the property was suitable for R-3 use. Ross stated he felt the Comprehensive Plan indicated low density multiple use for the property, not the medium density applied for; that R-2 would allow the applicant reasonable use of the property, but the applicant had refused to consider R-2. THE PENDING MOTION TO DENY THE REZONE REQUEST CARRIED; DENZER AND RACANELLO DISSENTING. The Chairman advised the applicant of his right to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission in writing to the City Council within ten days. (£) LAWRENCE, F. E., Appl. No. R-472-68; rezone from G-6000 to R-3; property located on SW corner S.E. 94th St. and 104th Ave. S.E. The Chairman described the rezone application. The Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map. Slides of the property were shown. Comments from the audience were invited. Mrs. Josephine Peterson, 1458 Hillcrest Lane, representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of the rezone request. She presented a contract purchase agreement to the Commission which read that the owner would not develop the property for multiple use until sewers were available. Mrs. Peterson described surrounding uses including those presently in the county just to the east of the Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26, 1968 Agenda Page 2 (b) Stollenmayer Addition, Appl. No. PP-473-68; property located north of S.E. 100th St. and westerly of 112th Ave. S.E. Total Area--2.9 ac. = (12 lots) Existing Zoning--G-7200 Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--108th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 100th St. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (c) Tiffany Park No. 2, Division No. 1, Appl. No. FP-470-68; property located north of City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline R/W, south of Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Line Easement, east of Tiffany #1 Plat and west of 128th Ave. S.E. (extended) Total Area--62 + acres (174 lots) Existing Zoning--G-7200 Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--Puget Drive via S.E. 154th St. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential REZONE APPLICATIONS (a) Holcomb, Edward A., Appl. No. R-468-68; rezone from G-7200 to R-3; property located on Sunset Blvd. E. between 132nd and 138th Aves. S.E. Total Area--4.2 ac. z Existing Zoning--G-7200 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--Sunset Blvd. E. Proposed Use--multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential and commercial (e) Cayford, M. and Huseland, A., Appl. No. R-471-68; rezone from G and G-6000 to R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 91st Pl. and S.E. 91st St. Total Area--29,700 sq. ft. z Existing Zoning--G and G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--Lake Washington Blvd., S.E. 9lst St., S.E. 91st Pl. Proposed Use--multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential on existing Plan; = single family residential on revised Plan (f) Lawrence, F.E., Appl. No. R-472-68; rezone from G-6000 to R-3; property located on SW corner S.E. 94th St. and 104th Ave. S.E. Total Area--10,200 sq. ft. Existing Zoning--G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--S.E. 94th St. Proposed Use--multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential on existing Plan; single family residential on revised Plan RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING JUNE 12, 1968 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: James E. Denzer, Wendell L. Forgaard, John Racanello, Norman L. Ross, John C. Sterling, Richard M. Stredicke, Clark Teegarden COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Dayle E. Garrison, Anthone R. Mola CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director; Lyman Houk, Engineering Department; Harriet Hilder, Recording Secretary The Administrative Meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Vice Chairman Teegarden at 8:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Denzer. All members responded present except Garrison, Mola, Sterling and Stredicke. Sterling and Stredicke arrived later in the meeting and were acknowledged. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES As there were no corrections to the Minutes of the meeting of May 22, 1968, the Chairman declared them approved as written. 3. NEW BUSINESS The Planning Director described briefly the following items of new business to come before the Commission at the June Public Hearing Meeting and pointed out each location on the zoning map. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATIONS (a) SCHUMAKER'S ADDITION, Appl. No. PP-469-68; property located NE corner S,£, TOUth St, and IUeth Aye, S.E, (b) STOLLENMAYER ADDITION, Appl. No. PP-473-68; property located north of S.E. 100th St. and westerly of 112th Ave. S.E. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (c) TIFFANY PARK NO. 2, DIV. NO. 1, Appl. No. FP-470-68; property located north of City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline R/W, south of Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Line Easement, east of Tiffany No. 1 Plat and west of 128th Ave. S.E. (extended) REZONE APPLICATIONS (d) HOLCOMB, EDWARD A., Appl. No. R-468-68; rezone from G-7200 to R-3; property Tocated on Sunset Blvd. E. between [32nd and 138th Aves. S.E. (e) CAYFORD, M. AND HUSELAND, A., Appl. No. R-471-68; rezone from G and G-6000 to R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 9Ist PI. and S.E. 91st St. (f) LAWRENCE, F. E., Appl. No. R-472-68; rezone from G-6000 to R-3; property Tocated on SW corner S.E. 94th St. and 104th Ave. S.E. (g) BIGGINS, CHESTER, Appl. No. R-474-68; rezone from R-1 to R-3; property Tocated at 2515 Sunset Blvd. E. Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 12, 1968 Agenda Page 2 * (e) Cayford, M. and Huseland, A., Appl. No. R-471-68; rezone from G and G-6000 to R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 9Ilst Pl. and S.E. 91st St. Total Area--29,700 sq. ft. * Existing Zoning--G and G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--Lake Washington Blvd., S.E. 91st St., Sek. 9ISt Pi. Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential on existing Plan Prone ach Wee-= vs single family residential on revised Plan Lawl (f) Lawrence, F. E., Appl. No. R-472-68; rezone from G-6000 to R-3; property located on SW corner S.E. 94th St. and T04th Ave. S.E. Total Area--10,200 sq. ft. Existing Zoning--G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--S.E. 94th St. Proposed Use--multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential on existing Plan single family residential on revised Plan (g) Biggins, Chester, Appl. No. R-474-68; rezone from R-1 to R-3; property located at 2515 Sunset Blvd. E. Total Area--17,400 sq. ft. = Existing Zoning--R-] Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--Sunset Blvd. E. and 10th Ave. N. Proposed Use--multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--multi-family residential (h) Bakamus, Alec, Appl. No. R-475-68; rezone from R-1 to B-1; property located on K St. between Sunset Blvd. E. and /0th Ave. N. Total Area--6,750 sq. ft. Existing Zoning--R-] Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--K St. Proposed Use--commercial Comprehensive Plan--commercial on existing Plan multi-family residential on revised Plan 4, ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS: (a) Sign Ordinance - proposed changes; review of by Assistant Building Director MEETINGS (b) Seattle Area Industrial Council Housing Conference, Olympic Hotel, Seattle, Monday, June I/7, 1968 (c) 33rd Annual Institute of Government; "Quality Environment - A Shared Responsibility", University of Washington, July 10, 1968 (d) Joint Study Session with City Council. Re: Comprehensive Plan FOR PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS CONTINUED FROM THE MAY 22, 1968 MEETING WILL BE INCLUDED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE JUNE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING IN ADDITION TO THE NEW BUSINESS ABOVE: Final Plat of Interlake No. 2 Rezone Appl. Hutchens-Engeland see to R-4) Rezone Appl. Gunnar Ostlund (G- AFFIDAVIT a i Ze / G als Z sal being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner Seek property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this _2f day of 2,7 _, 1944 a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Lz x) Lh ube Lusoe E Ye “ (Name) Signature of Owner ZA ER he, JLo i Aa Lo¢ 0-1 bM BEE, eee % y (Mailing Address) PENS COA Lae 0 SST ‘ 7 Oy, iooeint2g G13 = L a : BUOY “s (city) ~~ State) =F EA Dre ies al-3b 79 1a = 8 (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been fo e thorough and complete in every particular and to conform tg@th ules “and regulations of the Renton Planning Department gov sige of such application. _ 19 BY: Vito Date received Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 AFFIDAVIT i, ae a vs wisi wl being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of KE “Braperty involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 75 day of 22,. _, 19 44 Notary Public in and for the State Dy of . of Wabhenighany residing at 7 Po, Pai | _ | p= a See Mere A Cy thr : (Name ) ‘. “ “(Signature of se mer) 10H _ . Th yomaget 7 ee /bEYO WE DL rar (Malling Address) A pe ee Gxt Jedruwec tetoad . [parry mS : (City) (State) Tuy fe O awa (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certif me and has been . and to conform s Ss" & regulations of the Renton Planning Department gov do tna itnes! an of such application. ue a } 19 BY: bE ken. Tee m meena, 2 foregoing application has been inspected by , thorough and complete in every particular Date received \\-s Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JUNE 26 » 19.68 , AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS | 1. REZONE FROM G TO R-3; property located on Sunset Blvd. E. between 132nd and 138th Aves. S.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East 394.31' of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 3, Twp 23N, R 5E, W.M., lying northerly of Primary State Highway 2, less the easterly 140' and less all coal and mineral rights — (a yord- lus el and 2. REZONE FROM . AND G-6000 TO R-3; property located on Lake Washington Blvd. between S.E. 9lst Place and S.E. 91st St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 4, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 11 of plats, page 63, records of King County, Washington. 3. REZONE FROM G-6000 TO R-3; property located on SW corner S.E. 94th St. and 104th Ave. S.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 24 and 25, Block 13, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Div. #1, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 11 of plats, page 63, records of King County, Washington. 4, REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3; property located at 2515 Sunset Blvd. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4, Block 6, Renton Highlands, according to plat recorded in volume 46 of plats, pages 34-41, records of King County, Washington. 5. REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-1l; property located on K St. between Sunset Blvd. E. and 10th Ave. N. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East 100' of Lot 17 in Fred Akers Real Estate #1, according to plat recorded in vol. 63 of plats, page 72, records of King County, Washington. 6. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SCHUMAKER'S ADD'N; property located NE corner S.E. 100th St. and 108th Ave. S.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The south 3/4 of Tract 295 of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Div. #4, ac- cording to plat thereof recorded in vol. 11 of plats, page 82, records of King County, Washington, except the north 220° thereor, 7. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STOLLENMAYER ADD'N; property located north of S.E. 100th St. and westerly of 112th Ave. S.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 261 of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Div. #4, as recorded in vol. 11 of plats, page 82, records of King County, Washington; less the west 101.26' of the north 310' of the south 390' thereof. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 26, 1968, AT 8:00 P.M, TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME. JAMES E. DENZER, SECRETARY PUBLISHED JUNE 12, 1968 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION ly Delbert F Moss » HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS AW. BOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW f MIL ATTEST: Subscribed and. sworn SIGNED fre Are /\ MM, 77 to before me, a Notary Public, on the 14thaay of June ; 1968