Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutShort Plat File No 32-76STOP STOP STOP STOP. OTOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED. DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. 9/1 OP! STOP STOP STOP ' STOP BEGINNING OF FILE Spot (Plot — 0BA-To In the Superior Court of the State of Washington For the County of King STATE OF WASHINGTON {s No. ..E. 229134 County of King Whereas. the last Will of |. 000.000.0000 00000. ROBERT S. LANGDON eee deceased, was on the... 29th day of ... JANUARY... A.D.19.77......., duly exhibited, proven and recorded in our said Superior Court. and whereas, it appears in and by said Will that. ..........0..........2...0.0.. ) eRe wane Oe ae seacaniense SYLVIA JEAN LANGDON. .................... is (¥8Xappointed ExecutRIX.... thereon. and whereas said above named qualified as such on the. ..22th .. day of ..... JANUARY........ 19.77.... and ha .S . . . since the last mentioned date, been the appointed and qualified Execut .RIX. . . of said estate, now, there- fore know all men by these presents that we do hereby authorize the said above named to execute said Will accord- ing to law. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this . 25th ... day of .. JANUARY A.D.19.77....... s BETTY J. MULLEN, Superior Court Clerk 7 4 7 — 3 - By... L se PI oc vax vonsaneavaes DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, “bale of ? Wes len€ S. Ags acto) c lecree tid, CS Sal wie’ 4. /\ ang her’, exe ent)” : J ’ ’ 3 ‘ are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit ‘'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of the above described property, their suc- cessors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining Subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. CL A AA )Q, \N Bay Le if if {i L ; V7 4 U Mahe OF tiple f } PS. Prenge 2 { / STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) On this gs 4“ day of Ma, » 19 fH: before me personally appeared 1, ’ the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ) / Wh nat PN bi, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at (@inwK% <P DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS E; wHereas, — fy Cg fo bf Aisha al 5S. Aangelen ALE te = Lee L. Aasuatlen, olen) J , ( U é 3 3 are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of the above described property, their suc- cessors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities, and Street lighting. These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Pybpee)® ne Azad A Loews Lekdebieg I thre Nbc sP S Abngclo ia } NF STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) On this ol a __ day of Mag ; ae before me personally appeared Aijlind os Aves, Li ’ VA J" G- . 9 bd the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Vice DN) Lew, Notary Public in and for Ahe State of Washington, residing at &@uw cy OE RY ee ge Invoice No. 408 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 CITY CrleR Department or Division Date Please make checks sion payable to ngston Finance Department City of Renton +; Fees for Following Gocument filed with King inty Records & Elections Department: POT | ‘lat (file No. SP-32=B6) ee OH ording No. 7802210501 (copy attached) Fea. 28 99003 7602210501 — 2 ws 7.00 | tate Ni Mecetving Number!” Shor? Plat ~ "Rober S. ah aA “SP-3a-7b Total Due $7.90 % DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, SYLVIA J, LANGDON 3 LLOYD W, SALTER AND NINA J, SALTER CC , ’ bd 7 2 are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit ‘'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of the above described property, their suc- cessors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities, and Street lighting. These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. a? rm ” «Sw o DM ot 6 ‘s $ a . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) On this 25 day of JANUARY , 19 78 , before me personally appeared SyuviaA J. Lancpon _. _Lioyp W, Sater s AND NINA J. SALTER 2) 9 3 the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. of ost ALOE ob / LEA gt fet) ed ae of Washington, residing at 14907 S.E. 143rp Pt. Renton. WA, 98055 ELBA ACS LE ADDS DASE ELBE LS LMM hig ON GE ARE CITY OF RENTON PLAT APPLICATION Yan JX “a ‘ ___ SHORT PLAT FILE NO. \ “A ___MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D 2,2 ce ___ TENTATIVE FEE $307 SNe peor ___ PRELIMINARY RECEIPT NO. -og2s ___ FINAL SM NO. PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: l. Plat Name & Location No Name Located at the Northwest corner of Langston Rd. and Lind Ave 2. No. Lots 2 Total Acreage 0.51 zoning _R-] 3. .Owner R.S. Langdon Phone 255-5317 Address_ 312 Langston Rd, Renton, WA. 98055 4. Engineer Phone Address 5. Underground Utilities: Yes No Not Installed Telephone _ XxX _ Electric _ XxX —_——— Street Lights _ Xe ae Natural Gas xX __ _ TV Cable ) — Xx — 6. Sanitation & Water: /x/ City Water Ly/ Sanitary Sewers /_/ Water District No. /_/ Dry Sewers /_/ Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9. STAPF ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 1:0 « PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED ll. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ; © PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED L2s DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: ¢ ° DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 AFFIDAVIT I, R, S, Langdon , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 2nd day of July , 1976, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Bellevue ° Ga“ 7. HAE: Ela he a of Notary Public) 4h 14627 S.E. Newport Wy. 312 Langston Rd. (Address) (Address) e JOHN T. McCORMICK NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND ee STATE OF WA penton Ha { ate) CH 28, 1979 (Cit —— 94627 Se. NEWPORT wy. 7 GELLEVUE, WA 98006 299-5317 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION e foregoing application has been inspected by me ough and complete in every particular and to gulations of the Renton Planning Department of - inglae duck a plication. , 19 By: This is to certify and has been fou conform to the governing the Date Received Renton Planning Dept. 2=73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY hort Vat Application No. Bhs AL Environmental Checklist No. EC -1€ 5.96 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: [_] vectaration of Significance [_Joectaration of Significance C] Declaration of Non-Significance [] Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM eP BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent RS, Langdon 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 312 Langston Rd. Renton, WA. 98055 Ph. # 255-5317 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: None © 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): To take a residential lot of 0.51 acres which is zoned R-1 and make two lots out of it. S digit ae cnr sale “Maple beta ties ae aes Feparcuanetaaaies 3 eh ae AAR SNR eit Ca Mca yO yal fT OGM ey, del a sebaceous nahin Ae 10. L.14 12 20's | Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal): The Northwest corner of Langston Rd. and Lind Ave. Estimated date for completion of the proposal: Oct. 30, 1976 List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal, state and local--including rezones): Short Plat Approval by City of Renton Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: LE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (1) (Explanations of all "yes" and “maybe" answers are required) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Yes MAYBE rT (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES~ io (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any 4 unique geologic or physical features? x YES MAYBE N (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Xx YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: (b) House to be built on the site (l SS ee ——— ae : aan Maree asc} (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Xx YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE it (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? —— x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Xx YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X ~< Mm wn = > ~< wo mm a o (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Xx YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? D4 YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? 4 ~< m n = > ~< wo m = fe (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? zi YES MAYBE Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ; X, YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? xX YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Xx YES MAYBE NO 2) Explanation: & PR aia ea a ia ‘ i a al J cbbak aw so Aer il alga ee otk eS FAP AEE AE ARE ED _ : . Beare i - 4 we ' ‘ Ye Fai ‘ pa > a re y ! Bi ao (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the .migration or movement of fauna? x {d) Leterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE z fo n } Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: ; ; Xx (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natura) resources? YES MAYBE NO i (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Xx i Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- © a bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Xx YES MAYBE NO Explanation: pee m ae Nee an AT a RN UPR AN i eR ener nro: ~me - t na - ors -. (12) (13) (15) (16) ae @ wis Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ~< m n = ~< ao m za oO Explanation: Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? xX YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking ‘facilities, or demand for new parking? Xx YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 4 YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X m “ = ~ o m = Oo (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? a : Sp e Explanation: Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? Xx YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? Xx YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? Xx YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 4 YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Xx YES MAYBE Explanation: 2 Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? e x YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? xX YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? Xx Sa RD iin cd assets race iol Por brau tYiar tek Sed AR a ocak NOE tn WM or -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? 7 xX YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Yes MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in ‘an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ _X- YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical . site, structure, object or building? ‘ —.4 ae YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a SIGNATURE is true and complete. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there eS nny willful misrepresentation or willful arene Proponent: bre fal sae acer lack of full disclosure on my part. "(otanedl R.S. Langdon (name printed) ° City of Renton Planning Depar 5-76 rail 2 Satan re mth A sae ae aL tment S Fae os &, % Atay rs . ~ Oo THE CITY OF RENTON ce Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ar) CHARLES J. DELAURENT|, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 235-2550 < May 11, 1977 Ms. R. S. Langdon 312 S.W. Langston Road Renton, Washington 98955 RE: R. S. LANGDON SHORT PLAT NO. 32-76 Dear Ms. Langdon: ’ As per the Board of Public Works meeting of May 4, 1977, a deferment of the off-site improvements required by the Subdivision Ordinance was granted for the subject short plat until such time as construction is begun on the sub- ject site, or an LID is formed for the improvements in the general area. Attached is a restrictive covenant to be Signed by the owner(s) and notarized. It will be filed with the plat and run with the land. You may now complete your plat drawing and return it to this office so that it can be signed by the various City department heads and filed with King County. If you have any further questions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Wh eA hel ichael L. Smith Associate Planner GYE:MLS:wr cc: Lloyd Salter Building Division ® ®, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS e RENTON, WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING e 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH * RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 « BA8-3310 0, ‘ *? capita © May 6, 1977 Mr. Lloyd W. Salter 76 Monterey Place NE Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Right-of-Way and Off-site Improvement Requirements for Langdon Subdivision, 312 Langston Road Dear Mr. Salter: As you know, the City conditioned its approval of your subdivision upon the granting of a 10-foot strip of right-of-way pursuant to a recommendation by the Board of Public Works. In response to a request by Sylvia Langdon, the Board of Public Works has reconsidered its previous recommendation. At its regular meeting on May 4, the Board determined that the additional right-of-way is not required for street purposes as the area is already substantially developed and this action would not adversely affect the traffic circulation on that one-block section of roadway. It was noted that the house to the north of the subject property is in close proximity to the existing right-of-way, and it is questionable whether the City would be in a position to obtain the additional right-of-way from that property owner to develop the roadway to its full width. In view of this determination, the Board felt it was appropriate at the same time to consider the matter of off-site improvement requirements for the plat. Subsequently a deferment of the off-site improvements was granted until such time as an LID is formed for street improvements or until construction of the subdivision is completed. If you have any questions concerning the Board's action, please call. Sincerely, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Chairman ee: Ms. Langdon “Planning Department Engineering Division Building Division a” £a Sy O = all MUNICIPAL BUILDING »* 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH * RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 © BA8-33!0 oe os Pp % a 2 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS e RENTON, WASHINGTON F é w So <= ‘0 ‘ * capita © May 6, 1977 Mr. Lloyd W. Salter 76 Monterey Place NE Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Right-of-Way and Off-site Improvement Requirements for Langdon Subdivision, 312 Langston Road Dear Mr. Salter: As you know, the City conditioned its approval of your subdivision upon the granting of a 10-foot strip of right-of-way pursuant to a recommendation by the Board of Public Works. In response to a request by Sylvia Langdon, the Board of Public Works has reconsidered its previous recommendation. At its regular meeting on May 4, the Board determined that the additional right-of-way is not required for street purposes as the area is already substantially developed and this action would not adversely affect the traffic circulation on that one-block section of roadway. It was noted that the house to the north of the subject property is in close proximity to the existing right-of-way, and it is questionable whether the City would be in a position to obtain the additional right-of-way from that property owner to develop the roadway to its full width. In view of this determination, the Board felt it was appropriate at the same time to consider the matter of off-site improvement requirements for the plat. Subsequently a deferment of the off-site improvements was granted until such time as an LID is formed for street improvements or until construction of the subdivision is completed. If you have any questions concerning the Board's action, please call. Sincerely, 4K Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Chairman ec? Ws. Langdon “Planning Department Engineering Division Building Division oY mee . — TPA a $2 3, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ¢ RENTON, WASHINGTON wall, e MUNICIPAL BUILDING * 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH ¢ RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ¢ BA8 3310 So s 97 Caper . April 27, 1977 Ms. Sylvia Langdon 312 SW Langston Road Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Langdon Subdivision Dear Ms. Langdon: The Board of Public Works recently received a copy of a letter from Lawrence J. Warren concerning the Langdon Subdivision, and more particularly, a right-of-way requirement imposed by the City. As you know, the City conditioned its approval of the subdivision upon the granting of a ten-foot right-of-way pursuant to a recommendation by the Board of Public Works. At its April 20 meeting, the Board reconsidered its previous recommendation in view of Mr. Warren's letter and opinion regarding this matter. After due consideration, howcver, the Board of Public Works reaffirmed that the right-of-way requirement for the Langdon Subdivision is appropriate based on increased traffic and utilization of right-of-way which will result from the development of this property. If you would like to discuss this matter further with the Board, you are certainly welcome to attend our next meeting on Wednesday, May 4, at 9:00 a.m. in the fourth {floor conference room, Renton Municipal Building. Please advise me if you would like to meet with the Board. Sincerely, = 7 eT er nc, fn , OF RED Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. \ Public Works Director Ss off tH ry Chairman v cah ~ | cA maneetsennenene — cc: © Planning Department y Engineering Division 4 C7, AS, Lawrence .!. Warren Ve pepht 7 Wr. boride, Zire OF Re, . oO ys 3 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY e RENTON,WASHINGTON o> POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING © RENTON,WASHINGTON 96055 255-9678 © GERARD M.SHELLAN, city aTTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, assIsTANT CITY ATTORNEY April 13, 1977 , © RES Mr. Mike Smith Planning Department Renton City Hall Renton, Washington —_ BK 4, Re: Langdon Subdivision Ling pert Dear Mike: This letter is a follow up to our recent telephone conversation concerning the Langdon Subdivision. The City has conditioned its approval of the subdivision upon the granting of a ten foot right of way along a road, which I understand is a dead end road. As I expressed to you, during our conversation, I do not believe the request for the ten foot right of way has any bearing to the subdivision itself, and therefore, it is probably an unconstitutional taking of property without compensation. Additionally, to tie up the approval of the subdivision on that condition, it is probably an inappropriate use of the City's power. I would strongly suggest that the City ask for right of way only when the proposed action bears some relationship to increased traffic or increased utilization of the right of way. I might note parenthetically, that the City might check with King County, who I understand has dropped their road requirement for short subdivision approvals. Very truly yours, SHELLAN, PAIN & WARREN Ses ( - CALUDMEEE PI Lawrence J. Warren LJW:ad ae “ 3) VES 2 BOARL |." PUBLIC WORKS ¢ RE TON, WASHINGTON Le S2aN @ %, So 0, ‘ * capitar © MUNICIPAL BUILDING e 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH * RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 * BA8-3310 . November 16, 1976 Mr. Lloyd W. Salter 76 Monterey Place NE Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Request to Defer Off-site Improvements on Lind Avenue SW at 312 Langston Road Dear Mr. Salter: The Board of Public Works has received your October 26 request to defer installation of off-site improvements on Lind Avenue SW. At its November 3 meeting, the Board postponed action on this matter pending completion of the configuration and design of the short-plat. At such time, your request will be reconsidered. Sincerely, , Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Chairman cah # cc: ‘ Planning Department Design Division BOARD OF PUBLLU wunno ae Wedne: ip November 3, 1976 @& | Municipal Building 9:00 A. M. 4th Floor Conference Room Present: Warren Gonnason, Chairman Del Bennett, Airport Director Gene Coulon, Parks § Recreation Director Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director Gwen Marshall, Finance Director Cheryl Henry, Secretary Ron Nelson, Developmental Services Supervisor Tom Touma, Design Engineer 1. CALL TO ORDER--The November 3 meeting of the Board of Public Works was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Chairman Warren Gonnason. 2. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES--It was moved by DEL BENNETT, seconded by GENE COULON, that the minutes of October 27 be approved as wrttten. MOTION CARRIED. 3. CORRESPONDENCE: None 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None , 5. REFERRALS FROM DEPARTMENTS: None 6. ITEMS UNDER STUDY a. Lloyd W. Salter Request to Defer Sidewalk Installation, 312 Langston Road--The secretary read a report from Tom Touma dated November Z which recommended that installation of off-site improve- ments on Lind Avenue SE be deferred for a period of one year or until the first house is built, as indicated in Mr. Salter's application. As a condition of the deferment, Mr. Touma recommended the property owner be required to post a performance bond in the amount of $7,500. His report also pointed out the need for the extra ten feet of the proposed Robert S. Langdon short plat to be dedicated for public right-of-way. This would provide the 40-foot right-of-way necessary to construct a minimum 20-foot-wide roadway section. The Planning Director submitted a report from Mike Smith which indicated no objection to granting the request for a one-year period, subject to the posting of a bond or certified check in the amount of 150 percent of the estimated cost of the improvements. Mr. Ericksen noted that the short plat includes two untleveloped | lots, one 82 feet wide and one 60 feet wide. He questioned the reason for the two different-sized lots, indicating that 60 feet is the minimum allowable lot width and normally would not be recommended unless there were no alternatives. It was subsequently moved by GORDON ERICKSEN, seconded by GWEN MARSHALL, that any actton on the request be deferred pendtng completion of the configuration and destgn of the short plat... MOTION CARRIED. | 7 b. Rolling Hills Village Homeowners Association Request to Close SE [8th Street at Jones Drive--The Board reviewed a September 30 request from the Rolling Hills Village Homeowners Association for the closure of SE 18th Street at Jones Drive. The secretary read a report dated November 3 from Toth Touma which reported the status of the subject right-of-way. In his letter Mr. Touma explained that South 18th Street between Grant Street and the Rolling Hills development lies within Tax Lot 82, which is owned by Transamerica Development Company. This portion of South 18th Street has been in existence for several years (prior to the Rolling Hills development) as an extension of Ethier Road South. OF Rg alt Ve Pi “A” N ~~ ’ @& we PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z wll, S DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION @ 235-2631 B, — ae MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA. 98055 i) 2 x) Za) 4 N 7ED sept CHARLES J. DELAURENTI November 2, 1976 MAYOR Mr. Warren Gonnason, Chairman Members ot the Board of Public Works Subject: Off-Site "=provement Deferral - Lloyd W. Salter Gentlemen: We have reviewed the applicant's request for temporary deferral of sidewalks on Lind Ave. S.E. and recommend the following: The installation of off-site improvements can be deferred for a period of one year or until the first nouse is built as indicated within the applicant's appeal for variance. A performance bond in the amount of $7,500.00 must be posted with the City should the request for temporary deferral be granted. he . 2. It is necessary that the easterly 10 feet of the proposed Robert S. Langdon Short Plat be dedicated for public right- of-way. This will provide a 40-foot right-of-way to con- ~struct a minimum roadway section of 20 feet wide. Very truly yours, c 7, : - v oo et a . a op Bee ee Gb EEE oD five Ne Mounir H. Touma, P.E. Design Engineer MHT:sn oF Rey, A> & é THE CITY OF RENTON ie Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Zz is) ° a CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @® PLANNING DEPARTMENT % an 235-2550 2, < "ay w £0 septt November 2, 1976 TO! Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director FROM: Michael L. Smith Associate Planner RE: LLOYD SALTER'S REQUEST TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR DEFERMENT OF SIDEWALK INSTALLATION AT 312 LANGSTON ROAD The subject request is related to a proposed two lot short plat at the corner of S.W. Langston Road and Lind Avenue S.W. Attached is a copy of the proposed plat which is presently being reviewed by the various city departments. I see no serious problems in granting the subject request for a one-year period, subject to the posting of a bond or certified check in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of the improvements. MLS :ms Attachments = Ea we eas 4 Bi EG one Tet: To tes Ee EO de ee a ee Ne tus - iS Loy Pe ano e . sos aye ee « ~ . one aooahe dd i ne i Gis es tyes Biv a P be bo Gan § SSS - AR CY ro ST AK cACMT i db Ua — °° su 2 me rinet TR TUE OS! _ PLES ie Jia iu [HE i & — = UY os HIER 0 or UEFA, TE ' nase = Sao BUA COMMENTS YS miwuns AAVE, bd my LZ #2 727 © =< csi - ns a ye ey e ae ~ TAR - r t yt ‘ Date: 10-29-76 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS REFERRAL MEETING oF 10-37-76 a Department TO8 Design Division Lloyd W. Salter Request to Defer Sidewalk Installation SUBJECT: 312 Langston Road COMMENTS: Referred for review and report at the next BPW meeting. Application attached. cah OetoLer 26, rings Sh as eae Toes DELSS Attn: “prren Genneron Chadimia, [erard of Public “orks Attached is arn appliestion for s Deferral Of Of feat te Trmra Oi Gaw A 18 is Ter a sifevell on Tand Avene ©. 4) Pte some pti mare Pts rortion of a renlat now being rroeecrsde fo4 4 a . . 44 + * Poller present Vine thew ee ue ri@evalkhe on Ute strand pore itl fom traffic on tein slroct, We arn neural as Fe * fas) oar) Nb vy , cy + i - « . * s Fe . 2 Thank srau. fio; your consideration on this annlfention far thes Jot, andot thet time it would sees to he a hetter tine to Va PQ vey eferral, Reanoctfully vour ‘ : LY a F Hef Aa Slee. Lloyd he Enlbler 76 Honleresr Plase iy, henton, Vachidneton : {OF _RE ks atfllto “OS OCT 29 1976 ¥ BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS APPLICATION FOR APPEAL CITY OF RENTON DATE OF FILING _ 19-26-76 \ GRANTED _ DENIED __ DATE OF HEARING APPEALED a : t 2 12 ees # © es 1. NAME OF APPLICANT LLOYD =~ Ce DIE . CPLEASE PRINT) 2. ADDRESS 76 Monterey Pince I. le. “ection, Uechbaetoan Oons ’ ‘ ~ | 3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED 312 Langston Yond, Penton _. a, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: LOT BLOCK PLAT lat: Be PRESENT ZONING Das). | 6. EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED equa 6 jofesent of (opi Mek Wels improve | ' mont of a side well on Lind fre St trom ds Hime ty pal gyre ia, for LS 7 s Ts WHY CAN'T THE PROPERTY BE DEVELOPED WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE ? This nrare stu hac aen ewaants tdad ond ic megen Eber hetne procesced at the Citw Moll. Tt j- an ejde opt thie - fivew al ahte ier. Where fore ag ride les on lite ebreet nec. There ts very Vittle oro nny foot Lraeeia here. 8. WHAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS APPLY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO SUCH PROPERTY AND DO NOT APPLY GENERALLY TO PROPERTY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD Th. is Jerre dt oe haone we 14 ote Fyrp 7A beeps, ett pep cy ers room 4 YO, ed | econ a m sinlare ] sro] i 24 4 ry lee ce yyped tw Die | 9. IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTED THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY? Yes 10. WILL THE GRANTING OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE IN HARMONY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND NOT INJU- RIOUS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE? ves I DECLARE THAT I AM THE OWNER OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE | IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / Kae I Af nape Aik ed CO te | SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department y) Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. " () Traffic Engineering Div. Engineering Div. () Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT: Review of ECF- ; Application No.: #32-7¢ Action Name: RN, L4énNgpon) SMe T flat Please review the attached. Review requested by (date): REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: JiCD CG . “a Sis en ty oak amet Comments nlo Cea Ric AUT pan \ ‘a Tangeare f°) oT a or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: FRI Comments: ahs Sago Lec P et scygensan le 2 Jb. Pele FoSe Srre sy ey rl Se’ Pa ho ef cad C yy j; “oe Bedcrcet Vie D necerca— pfs 7b Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Utilihes Ditsidn Comments: No Tmpact A Lthre Water Main Cx feng sir wll be RequirdS P Lind Ane SW, B The Cu, | Consider a fem porary Seruce Rarcemadl” tO ken installahm ot a late dik. ROE VEG Signature of Director Wr Authorized Representative Date ENDING OF FILE “hota O38 To