Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-030 (2)H,„.. I D vG(v' t' I aA L.. 117)e..--- cre..IPTicat.) LILI--- Lots 53 and 54, Block A, I-I-3" I Hillman's Lake Washington vi% I n J r FUEL.— dli.. N Garden of Eden No. 2, and 6)1 -- r i 1 I shorelands adjoining and I Ii westerly five feet of former 49/ N. P. Railway adjoining and i1 i south of railway crossing 57,: -i N in N.P. Railroad permit of sr 9-1-36 to Carl Jorgenson i et al, EXCEPT east 10 feet x tST.1 NSG. t 0 v\i I—Li N.1 03 for road. I . mj IllCITY ry-- 77.17-..)-, ta'-o" 2D E:. r-3, L, i. ., f i',.P R 15 1.q.76 BUILDING DIVISION A. 1;.-1 . 7/ z<- i r5j-L,(31- ---1-='-IJA-1\-1 t 15Gl.LE.L1 Q4-()" ti R. 8 -IA s L au!s-± = -- wc: . ., E'k 370 S L K. WikI L LLD.NC rz.Etirrot i-_wl sR__ _i f 4-CY_d' ti L ,..-_,,„C.- -Fi'••=1 p)k..;LQ,-.7.-_4xrD---- i foocc. q_23 - 76 - PeMoi-:' L. A 44 w bti'A --S'Hi 1 Nu 7"0 1 1 if.. Z G - "1(I - Re M ode! 7 0 -11 b13 ) JOB iiiiC. z- /i/K+7, f7/V( :44G.v• SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY w '1 DATE lO/ZP/74, CHECKED BY DATE J SCALE D,e • h It c/Z447-.,. -,zo_. 1 7o7IA .v I I f04iloeli fLT i I r C, tiY ii CrV. Cot is 711,E /fge.i y ... 14/ dd ocVe.... _... ..._. 2G` A,5.L• 5 iI'l Vx). .L-:,Omod... ii/4 I/. . 0 'Jew 1-2) Y... 1 r4/ ki , . .. , 10Y........ sew : _ T. fi v ile ff tlA s-....BIZ IC K r t)A a Al I j'Z2E AK.E 4 41I I1G-oN III— oc c._ c i.ai IT k.t.._. oT_ io.1J. 11 R. *.. MIZS LoutS _ NDETZSeIJ : iii\ FORM 204 Ayala f EBSJINC.Tow , ass 01470 JOB 114 t /II X.,• nivvvi.:>acv. SHEET NO d/ OF G j CALCULATED BY ! w i J DATE l4/20/7` CHECKED BY DATE SCALE C/o/v • r : p.L... i ems, I l . I j e.4eneir7.. .. s .........._. . M,es........... 6-,),. 1 4e' st i' ' ' a Ei„.u. :.si.,,-,_,.—74,3 . uew , Id-G ill ' :'.1 I 44/404, i 'r D f L5:40,14reel4 .N 0 A a ._........ o'a'1 . f T L.Biz c MILL Doc ram _ : Cy P536 Ni H•_._ NCido_ 4 1 ,... ! ! ! .., : 50 t 1L ! ,4. .r GQ aK.E 4.5k-1lJCA O 4s-9" ELE /. 14`-a AA. 5. p'oc Ae__. 4ix... ;Tr. .....nil _.. _.. 11 T11 aA R.. *.......M TZS L CU I S A Nji)Era s e 1 ( 3 L cUi..) . (---, L..vim, 0 rE L) I 1 CA ..I..S 1---/8 Om aEg.... . FORM 204 Available from l EBSJ r.c Townsend.Mass 01470 JOB VA POS. /7A4V/45.6 d SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE 4111111 SCALE r-- r„,, II 11Prilir[ h. a •s I . le • i. 1 . 1illj..1II NEW II 41° C:Eei:Milr e fi Aase cdo,„4406 etc Oia) eotae444 Star*/1 1 .4.i 1 -.. 1... 1 I i I i- 1 1/.1a\iV a r . • • V i aW t t 1 1 i 4 1 t ' t . 1 1 1 II6 1 I II I In 1IIroarli IiI1it 4 4. Iget) FOCA, 094e#0#1,4. C4P 40.*,,,,,,..•: ,'' . 1 i . Almapezeoviivolie 7-teelAsea1 ":.-- 8,6fr/ A#40,400v 14'64 ,1 wetzvApeo 40,-/tetdre cl,1.) V I 5 L1/4) FORM 204 Avabble from 1/V- SiiNC Townsend,Mass 01470 JOB a' A. p , SHEET NO. o+- CALCULATED BY nxrs CHECKED BY o^rs omLs All. L_- _ 7 L~-' f-- 7 l_- 7 ` i--1--` -- -'--r-- 7' / |- of R4,4 eI THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n 4 - BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERO 09 P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 17O SEPrc ' I July 11, 1983 Mr. Louis L. Andersen 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA 98056 RE: SHORELINE VARIANCE - 030-83 Dear Mr. Andersen: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the above-referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the Building and Zoning Department for submission to the State of Washington for their concurrence. You will receive notification of final approval from the State of Washington. If you have any questions;, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kau an Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:se F cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King SUE ELLISTON being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 10th day of June 19 83, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 10thday of June 19 83 No ry Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: LOUIS L. ANDERSEN: V-030-83 The mLnwte , contain a Litt o6 the panties a5 necond. ) June 10, 1983 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: Louis L. Andersen FILE NO. V-030-83 LOCATION: 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a variance from the Shoreline Master Program to permit the construction of a sundeck addition to a single family residence within the rear yard setback. The structure would be approximately ten (10) feet from the shoreline of Lake Washington. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Modification of the variance to sixteen 16) feet to allow for the construction of stairs and a landing for fire access. Hearing Examiner Recommendation: The shoreline variance should be approved. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on May 24, 1983. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 31, 1983, at 11:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application and other pertinent documents. Exhibit #2: Site plan showing the existing structure, proposed deck and adjacent structures. Exhibit #3: Site plan submitted in 1976 for a building permit, which shows it was 39.4 feet from the shoreline at that time. The staff report was presented by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. Mr. Blaylock noted the application is to allow construction of a sundeck within the 20 foot setback requirement of Lake Washington. The new structure would be approximately 10 feet from Lake Washington. Mr. Blaylock reported that construction on the adjacent property to the south is . presently so imposing it appears to intrude on the subject site and the deck would not be visible from this property. The Examiner called on the applicant for testimony. Testifying was: Louis L. Andersen 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA 98056 Louis L. Andersen V-030-83 June 10, 1983 Page 2 Mr. Andersen indicated the problem with constructing his deck on the ground level is the neighbor's sewer line runs through his property in that location and the area contained the cleanout point for three sewers in the area. Mr. Andersen asked to be allowed at least a five (5) foot deck since his back yard is unusable. He further indicated that the original intent when constructing the home was to build the sundeck in question. The Examiner noted there were no other persons in attendance at this hearing. There being no further testimony in support or opposition, the Examiner closed the hearing at 11:10 a.m. and indicated his recommendation would be made to the State and they would take some type of final action on the request. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Louis L. Andersen, filed a request for approval of a variance from the Shoreline Master Program to permit the construction within the 20-foot setback required along Lake Washington's shoreline. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building & Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit *1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located at 3703 Lake Washington Boulevard N. just south of N. 32nd Street as extended. 6. The subject lot, an approximately 4,130 sq. foot (landward dimensions) lot is occupied by an existing single family dwelling. The lot is 40 feet wide and currently has approximately a 20-foot deep rear yard frontage on Lake Washington. The existing dwelling was remodeled and expanded in 1976, bringing it to within the permitted 20 feet of Lake Washington. 7. The applicant proposes constructing a rear second story deck approximately 29 feet wide and 11 feet deep. The proposed deck would intrude into the required south side yard. 8. The Shoreline Master Program provides that no structure may be built within 20 feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington, whereas the applicant has proposed building within 9 to 10 feet of the shoreline. The applicant has therefore requested a variance from the provision of the Master Program. 9. The proposed deck would also intrude into the required south side yard and no variance has been requested from the side yard requirements. 10. The subject site was annexed into the city in a single family category in December of 1969. The site is currently zoned R-1 (Single family residential; minimum lot size - 7,200 sq. ft.). 11. Variances for rear yard decks along the shorelines of Lake Washington have been approved for a number of properties since the inception of the Shorelines Master Program to provide usable rear yards. (See V-027-77, Steen; V-027-82, Kendrick). 12. The area consists of predominantly single family homes constructed on relatively smaller parcels of land. The lots actually are larger as they consist of not only the upland portions of land, but generally a large complement of submerged property out to the harbor line. Louis L. Andersen V-030-83 June 10, 1983 ; Page 3 CONCLUSIONS: 1. While under a strict analysis of the criteria for approving a variance, a rear deck is not generally necessary to secure a.property owner reasonable use of property. In the instant case, the small landward portion of property deprives the applicant of rear yard space equivalent to that possessed by other owners of single family homes. 2. The criteria for evaluating the request are derived from two sources. The state criteria provides one set of standards and the city provides an additional set, although they overlap in most particulars. 3. They both require that unusual circumstances of size, shape, topography or performance standards preclude reasonable use of the subject site. The lot while containing underwater area has only approximately 4,100 square feet el surface area and this leaves a relatively small rear yard. The proposed deck would d. i sufficient square footage to provide the applicant with an amount equivalent to the other single family homes. 4. Similarly, both require that the permitted improvement will not impair the public welfare or adversely affect other properties in the vicinity of the subject site. The deck is generally designed to blend harmoniously with the existing single fames home. Since the property to the south is separated by a relatively high brick wall, the deck will not intrude or adversely affect that property. The neighbor to the north had ma objection. 5. The city and state standards both indicate that the approval should not grant the applicant a special privilege. Similar permission has been granted along the shoreline (V-027-82; V-027-77) by the city in the past and the creation of reasonable outdoor space will not afford the applicant relief not:enjoyed by others similarly situated. 6. The approval of the variance does not appear to generate any particular adverse affect upon either the public welfare nor neighboring properties, nor does it appear to create =ay special precedent. 7. The applicant will have to comply with the side yard setbacks. RECOMMENDATION: The shoreline variance should be approved. ORDERED THIS 10th day of June, 1983. 47:--011 (ar Fred J. Rauf n Land Use He g Examiner TRANSMITTED;THIS 10th day of June, 1983 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Louis L. Andersen 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of June, 1983 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Louis L. Andersen V-030-83 June 10, 1983 Page 4 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a.land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications .concerning the the proposal must be made in public: This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015. of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 24, 1983. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the' Examiner is based .on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title N, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. _ Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. p d i J 11 78 93 E,vur- it !NE t0n ME* IT1. 4.041' 6d soaLE p. EAC II©IIMBEIii nw K. 14.T L4' F '" i z IiTiiIiiii i iiiiiiii ii"i ii" 1e/lj ft ib!1 O y 1 N. 35.2 4t. 4 1111111111 111111 [till. I r I 4011 11.11111111p Ill 11111W Atha.. IIl ll_11.81NIII1 1E1111 isa51.°9- 21:211111111gli . 1`.; :. :: .' :ill.] . eel i 11. 7 M11 nil ill r r T T7 :, ITTAiP911 _N 1 A 1 ' a' °1 iiiiiiiil 11G111111 11Fi11L111I11 o 4,, J , eee l S 11@I111® ' 111 a. 1 1, Q fl t I 0 ii111! Y 1. _ I I I I 1 I I I I lI 11 I ' z. rVIT1IeeeCaerITTTITILI' llM111111 I _ I 1111111 !1111 :o.'i. 1 4 i. ,:u1N , 4. 10° 1 III 11 1 tiiIIlIIh11IIII11H11h iiNY IIuiifl!UPIIIIIIIH1h'a a i - 111111 Iillrl[ 11 1111111 i ' ',.,\ NIEY AK r110 LOUIS L. & GAIL H. ANDERSEN V-030-83 VARIANCE FROM 20 FOOT SETBACK FROM SHORELINE APPLICANT LOUIS L. & GAIL H. ANDERSEN TOTAL AREA — PRINCIPAL ACCESS VIA LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENCE — SINGLE FAMILY EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED USE ATTACH DECK TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS l BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING May 31, 1983 APPLICANT: Louis L. Andersen FILE NUMBER: V-030-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a variance from the Shoreline Master Program to permit the construction of a sundeck addition to a single family residence within the rear yard setback. The structure would be approximately ten (10) feet from the shoreline of Lake Washington. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. r Owner of Record: Louis L. and Gail H. Andersen 2. Applicant: Louis L. and Gail H. Andersen 3.Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 4,130 square feet. 6. Access: Via Lake Washington Blvd. N. 7. Existing Zoning: R-1, Residence -,Single Family. 8. 'Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residence - Single Family; R-2, Residence.- Two Family; R-3, Residence - Multiple Family. 9.Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family Residential. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on May 20, 1983, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 19, 1983. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 2531 of December 22, 1969, effective December 24, 1969, at which time it was zoned G-7200. The zoning classification G-7200 was changed to R-1 with the adoption of the new zoning map which combined several single family designations into one classification. The Zoning Map was adopted by Ordinance No. 3634 on June 13, 1982. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is essentially level. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSEN: V-030-83 MAY 31, 1983 PAGE 2 2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Loam (AgC), 6-15% slopes. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, business, row crops, and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by urban vegetation consisting of lawn and ornamental plants. 4.Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site. 6. Land Use: An existing single family residence is located on the subject site. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties or principally single family residential in nature. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Water and Sewer: A six-inch water line runs along Lake Washington Blvd. N. near the subject site. An eight-inch sanitary sewer line runs along Lake Washington Blvd. N. near the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METRO Transit Routes #142 and #144 operate along Burnett Avenue N. within 800 feet of the subject site. 4. Schools: Kennydale Elementary School is approximately .6 of a mile east of the subject site. McKnight Middle School is approximately 1-1/2 miles to the southeast and Renton High School is within 2-1/2 miles of the subject site. 5. Recreation: Kennydale Beach Park is approximately 1/2 of a mile to the north and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is slightly more than 1/3 of a mile southeast of the subject site. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-706; R-1, Residence - Single Family. 2. Section 4-722, G; Variance. H. APPLICABLE SEG4+IONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Renton Shoreline Master Program: a. Section 7.14.01B, Residential Development. b. Section 8 , Variances and Conditional Uses. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1.Natural Systems: None. 2.Population/Employment: None. 3. Schools: None. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic: None. FR' + 't Y .i l '"1"i` xorb nK`A wi PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSEN: V-030-83 MAY 31, 1983 PAGE 3 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal on May 4, 1983. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1.City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2.City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3.City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4.City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5.City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6.City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7.City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant is seeking approval of a variance from Section 7.14.01(B) of the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program which requires a twenty (20) foot setback of a structure from the water's edge. The applicant's deck would extend ten (10) feet into the twenty (20) foot setback. 2. The Environmental Review Committee issued a final declaration of non-significance. 3. The Shorelines Management Act of the State of Washington governs development on the shoreline. The Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office approves or denies variance in shoreline areas. The City of Renton makes recommendations to the state. Two sets of variance criteria are used to analyse the application in preparing a recommendation to the state: (1) state criteria established in WAC 173-14-150; and, (2) Section 8, variance and conditional uses of the City of Renton Shorelines Master Program. 4. The state reviews variances for development on the upland portion from the shoreline based on five criteria. The following analysis addresses each of the criteria: a. "That strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards as set forth in the applicable master program precludes a reasonable permitted use of the property." The applicant has not proven that he is deprived of a reasonable use of the property. The deck would make the use more aesthetically comfortable. b. "That the hardship described in WAC 173-14-150(3)(A) above is specifically related to the property, and is a result of unique condition such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the Master Program and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own action." The hardship is a result of the small lot, only +4,100 square feet. Most of the waterfront lots are this size in the vicinity. c. "That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or to the shoreline environment designation." The adjacent property to the south presently intrudes upon the subject site. The proposal will help blend the uses. d. "That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special priviledge not enjoyed by the other property owners in the area and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief." PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSEN: V-030-83 MAY 31, 1983 PAGE 4 Several other variances have been granted for decks in the general area and this would not be considered a special priviledge. However, in those cases, the deck provided level recreational space that had not been available before. In this case, it increases by approximately 30% to 35% the recreational space on the lot above its neighbors. Therefore, it does grant a special priviledge. e. "That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental affect." At the present time the public does not have the right of access to the shoreline in this general area or does it appear that this situation will change. The shoreline is almost completely occupied by single family residences; public use areas are concentrated to the south at Gene Coulon Park. Therefore, the only possible detrimental impact to the public would be visual from the lake. 5. The City of Renton's Shoreline Master Program in Section 8.02, establishes similar criteria for the review of variances. The following analysis addresses each of the five criteria: a. "Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property or to the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity." The only unusual condition that exists is the size of the lot, +4,100 square feet, which precludes normal outdoor recreational activities. b. "The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity." It does not appear that this is true. A special priviledge may be actually granted. c. "The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare of injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity." This is true. In fact, it will help relieve some of the visual damage done by the residence to the south. d. "The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program." The Master Program encourages residential use of the subject property and can be considered in general harmony. e. "The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program." The variance neither harms nor benefits the public welfare and interest. 3. The proposed deck does not comply with the side yard setback requirements of six (6) feet on the south side. This can be modified. 4. The primary issue is increasing the recreational area of the rear yard by building a second level. In the other nearby variance approvals, they were replacing area lost by topography. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSEN: V-030-83 MAY 31, 1983 PAGE 5 5. The issue of assuring that the deck or area under the deck is not enclosed has not been addressed. If the variance is granted, restrictive covenants should limit it to a deck only. 6. The only reasonable purpose for the deck is fire access. This could be accomplished by a four (4) foot wide landing and stairs. A patio could be constructed at ground level to provide the recreational space. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the variance, V-030-83, be modified to sixteen (16) feet instead of the requested ten (10) feet to allow for the construction of stairs and a landing for fire access. i :78 ENHY- n 1 z g ee,, , e, i 11, 4!! .to ! L°'ff li / i'I iiIii .. „ 3&uuln ill, ND wnew& pL.=re. 3555 s r ar ciisi r^ 3 co Q t•` A 1111111 I1II 1n 1:11m1 1 4 55 -i i .-. : •i i 1 ii . %. i .. ' : , N. aa. 21 . 5 . 1 1111141 !It 3 3 fl1IIII . 11 1111 I11 141111 ILin-Mill TT TTT1 I - 5' I f l l 4 1 4.w11 44 1 1 1 L 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l I 3 4.,/ . ,,,,. . - . I,Lh . 'I s 1 11G' 1'11L1 11"I 0111111111WLT1 w „,.Iron OI1111111 = :2r111ro111 11 } YQs Z 1 time 12 Ee!!I,.!! IT TT Iii, v"" ` `N.30/ 4 1W P I-I 111111lI 11 3 L 11 1 1c eee n l i 1111 11.11 I 11.111111 1 •, 1:: , a IlY , 1111111111 1'111.1 I!li t ii ,z, 111.111111O1'1111111.11.411 . i r, f, „.,, 111 L[UII ILU a'''' aii. t• to IP \ ti Ii:::Y;: 1. t.K:Ni ' 1 LOUIS L. & GAIL H. ANDERSEN V-030-83 f VARIANCE FROM 20 FOOT SETBACK FROM SHORELINE APPLICANT LOUIS L. & GAIL H. ANDERSEN TOTAL AREA - PRINCIPAL ACCESS VIA LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENCE - SINGLE FAMILY i EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE t PROPOSED USE ATTACH DECK TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS 1 JOB M2 9 /if/ZS% /7/41/71•52 --te'AL. ' SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY /./.e./44-2-7,,,e• DATE. CHECKED BYBY DATE SCALE. Ooe)g. • LA P.v--. ••• -4- --• Nz.0/4 1 „ . S..e.z.‘7, 724.2 .... .. L... .:. . . ., . . . . : .. ..:. . .1 . . 3707 p. . i 1 ea/ -• L. ? ri • , i ' ,e6, 1 4,....... ..i..!.. • 1 . eicia.4.,/' ! ! i evAoaer. ...... . _I, 04,-..!.0...c` / -1'-ee 7-./ •/4 E. 411P. : ' • : i" 1. . 1 1,404,c,,p,,ur- 74,,,,es 4 404a#• 4 'f4. IA: 4 r., • 1.-E:A11. @ 06.7:-- ! 47D'S 6 W,.•94 25-7 412,47. P. 40 2C.'.A,. .L. • 7,*4,e;1„, z4x,,,r4.1 i\ i„ R4f.). 4)760I _ 1p„, T•-• e.4:-• 4--i- • i• 4..... 0-51.P4fit.• r 0. 1..), [5,,!4 i z-.1 1 i 5#0./ze.re.14 ! N: . ! I';Ili,. i 1101:' A : : i 1 "- - --: —7 ---. -- • 1 •. . Doc i(-- e'. 'A"......14.114.Ay...._._:.! ... ... r_ I.N. . ,.1 -v --i- /ve es/A/44704 , as H--;— : 1. ..._....,•••••.... .. . ,,. :sif...EveROz -E1,3.... f.i • L , : 0„Av.„ ksk-.1 1,.0c,' t..-. ic*N th._ .Nv. : i4 Lic,7 A, 51._.1 at mor miNt 7---7 tta i ! asive : ! 7-7- t..5: 1 .. .L A, 1i_. or III IT] I I ' . 1 ...po..iDErzeit3 . 7.0..' ? t-14-. 0i 1,S . (' L.vr ,.- ,L.14o .. • 7---7era-tr.m L.) c),... .is.. . , .• . : • i 1 . A0 . s.1--.-1,8...±.. . — FORM 204 AvoilabM from fAIESiorC Townsend.Mass 01470 Tr % ' . . .;-2,.,';:44'Z.A .i9fig.tf'fi'1114.*143:iffeMAr• ''''±'‘',''',01kiirt'ob-r42iMAk FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SM-105-83, V-030-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-017-83 Description of Proposal:Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow said deck into the rear yard setback, along Lake Washington. Proponent: Louis L. Anderson Location of Proposal: 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 4, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, James Matthew, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC, on application ECF-017-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Louis L. Anderson, DATED April 12, 1983. 2.Applications: Substantial shoreline development permit (SM-105-83), Variance V-030-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Police Department, Building and Zoning Department and Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. SIGNATURES: 7 tonald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric rd C. Houghton r Public Works Director PUBLISHED: May 9, 1983 APPEAL DATE: May 23, 1983 r— Date circulated :_l ':,,L 26. 1983 Comments ,Je : MAY 3, 1983 EKVIROMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 83 • APPLICATION No (s ) . SM-105-83 (SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) PROPONENT : LOUIS L. ANDERSON PROJECT TITLE : N/A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SUNDECK WITHIN 10 ne1' OF THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON LOCATION : PROPERTY IMAIIDAT 3703 LAKE WASHINGTON BIND. NO. SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (? ) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : ii ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) 'oise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL east : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL south : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL west : LAKE WASHINGI N land use conflict:: : MINTh L View obstruction : POSSIBLE FROM RESIDENCE TO NORTH 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public set vices :X I 15 ) Energy : X r i 16 ) Utilitiest . X . 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X. , 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures : 7 onald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director e Rid and C. Houghton, Public Works Director OF RFC f © z DiTicE Ao9„ D SE,„ City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a puBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MAY 31, 1983 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FILE SM-105-83 AND V-030-83 fl REZONE From To Li SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT fl VARIANCE FROM LJ SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/VARIANCE FOR SETBACKS GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT 3703 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD, NO, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ED SIGNIFICANT NON—SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON May 31, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HARRISON SHORT PLAT Application to short plat 1.78 acres into four (4) lots with two (2) variances, allowing a private street and a reduction of its width, and a waiver application for curbs and sidewalk, File Sh. Pl. 014-83, V-015-83, V-016-83 and W-017-83; located at 1832 N.E. 20th Street. HANCHEROFF SHORT PLAT Application to short plat 305,000 square feet of property into two (2) lots for a proposed doctor's/medical office and a variance from Section 4-1102(8) of the Subdivision Ordinance to allow access to Lot #2• by an established easement, File Sh. Pl. 023-83 and V-024-83; located at 1600 Eagle Ridge Drive. LOUIS ANDERSON Application for a substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow the deck into the rear yard setback within ten (10) feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington, File SM-105-83 and V-030-83; located at 3703 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON May 31, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR.OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : May 20, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the I $ day of May, 1983. QS L1 La 0 at ,ln SIGNED: FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SM-105-83, V-030-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-017-83 Description of Proposal:Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow said deck into the rear yard setback, along Lake Washington. Proponent: Louis L. Anderson Location of Proposal: 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 4, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, James Matthew, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-017-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Louis L. Anderson, DATED April 12, 1983. 2. Applications: Substantial shoreline development permit (SM-105-83), Variance V-030-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Police Department, Building and Zoning Department and Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. SIGNATURES: 2 ge/zaz6.1_,Z/•• Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric rd C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: May 9, 1983 APPEAL DATE: May 23, 1983 r Date circulated : APRIL 26, 1983 Comments due : MAY 3, 1983 ERVIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SM-105-83 (SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) PROPONENT : LOUIS L. ANDERSON PROJECT TITLE : N/A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SUNDECK WITHIN 10 rEIl' OF THE 'SHORELINE OF. LAKE WASHINGTON L O C A T I ON : PROPERTY LOCAT1 D AT 3703. LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NO. SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (? ) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : , X 3 ) Water & water courses : X Li ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : SINNT,F, FAMILY RESIDENTIAL east : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL south : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL west : LAKE WASHINGTON Lard use conflicts : MINIMAL View obstruction : POSSIBLE FROM RESIDENCE TO NORTH 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( 1TE ) : traffic imparts : 14 ) Public services :X I 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health : X 18) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures : 6-iejW . onald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director L• Ri and C. Houghton,g s Public Works Director C , f r APPLICATION NO. . ECF,.017—83 t fir• 1 PROPOSED ACTION APPLI:CATION::FOR SllBSTANTIAL SRORELINE DEVELOPM3sIT PERMIT TO ALLOW A SUNDECK.& APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW DECK' INTO REAR YARD, SETBACK GENERAL LOCATION ' AN DR '`ADDRESS 4;`D PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3703,LAIE WASHINGTON BLVD.: NO:, ' " POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED r PERSONS :OF AN . ENVIRONMENTAL r ACTION. THE r CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW r - COMMITTEE E E.'R.C.L3 -.,HAS `,.DETERMINED THAT THE.-:' ' PROPOSED ACTION" r , ' ODO,ES: DOES- NOT, ' HAVE A SIGNIFICANT,, ADV-ERSE:,'. IMPACT ON - THE - , ENVIRONMENT. r AN. ENVIRONMENTAL .IMPACT, STATEMENT ' DWILL': ILL NOT , BE, REQUIRED., ANI APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED FILED• WITH THE.. REN'TON .NEARING' • EXAMINER . " BY 5:00 P.M.,, MAY 23,., 19 b FOR, FURTHER ,INFORMATION CONTACT : THE CITY .O a;r y,;, BUILDING 'S.'.'ZONING DEPART TENT ap-4625-5(j- ,;;,..- . -:,,:',--,. . ; , :,:. ,:. , ,- :.. „ • ':', -,...-41, -:: i.,,,ts,,'0. r r - DO NOT REMOVE , T O_ TICE c y r WITHOUT PROPER 'A " _ !I NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: RAX SYSTEMS RESTAURANT (ECF-015-83). Application for building permit to construct a 2,800 square foot fast food restaurant, file B-287; property located at 4114 N.E. 4th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of . non-significance for--the following projects: LOUIS L. ANDERSON (ECF-017-83) Application for substantial shorline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence and variance application to allow said deck into rear yard setback, file nos. SM-105-83, V-030-83; property located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 23, 1983. Published: May 9, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA May 4, 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. PENDING BUSINESS: ECF-011-83 SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. PP-020-83 Application for preliminary plat approval for a 15-lot single family development on a 3.42 acre tract; property located on the south side of N.E. 20th Street at Kennewick Avenue N.E. ECF-015-83 RAX SYSTEMS RESTAURANT B-287 Application for building permit to construct a 2,800 square foot fast food restaurant; property located at 4114 N.E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS ECF-017-83 LOUIS L. ANDERSON SM-105-83 Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow V-030-83 a sundeck for a residence and variance application to allow said deck into rear yard setback; located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North. ECF-018-83 AUSTIN COMPANY SP-029083 Application for special permit to allow completion of filling and grading of 29 acre site previously granted under permit No. B-' 6671, file SP-320-79, 100,000 cubic yards proposed; located between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue S.W. and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. INFORMATION: Letter from David R. Clemens to Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch regarding Maple Valley Highway improvement status. City of Tukwila PlanningDepartment For ERC's Review: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Tukwila Bend Office Park. Any comments are due by June 3, 1983. 0. A) C„ EE VI Fli @ I 41OFRA,j APR 2 _ 1983 80 4) z SHORELINE MANAGEMENT--VC' T'.'Of ' 1971 CITY OF R. ENTONo 0, 94 F0 SEP1°° B.NILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 206) 235-2550 APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. : 3NA- I08-K5, -o o-i ECF No: P CIF - (ell-W) SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Sec-Twnp-R t. Y/ h 32- 2 4- - PERMIT Date Received 4 - ;2I- j 'j Date Accepted 4- 2,i- ``? CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved Date Denied ON VARIANCE Publication Date AFF Comprehensive Plan Jit)L.)C1 "Fir(111-4.1 1--1 EXEMPTION Zoning K7, 11 jiMCrItZ rfsinfli`r Water Body L JNe_, l a.)F*c-A-f i t.i Ci 10r4. tiEc rpT I In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The .Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note permit procedure on the last page). APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1. Name of Applicant LC)-i L , A1/4l 1I).G GE n, 2. Mailing Address7)7 0: VA{ ,VA5‘•k . \ L.:..i y \1 9 E co Telephone: 2? 6 - S L 3. Applicant is: Owner Lessee Contract Purchaser Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone' 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) ' 1 0 Yam! Ov 1 U) c--1,C\ 8 0 5 C C .6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : Lo-r . 3 c-v 1-\ L.L.t\A(ki\l,s L1M-<G \NIA Cam.' t e'ct.r\R 44-- ia 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: l Ah.H Rol C `7- Ci N 8. Intended use of property: SPGstM i L-. E=G i \ 9. Generally_ describe the property and existing improvements: \ \'tc SUN EcK o 2°„ NND 1-CI 6 k) k 10. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this applicatipri: I 000 B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested: Begin U L L \ I ci B End vi-1 1 GI, ej-• 11. Does this project require a shoreline location? Explain. i-hC 1NitSHal t CC__ < \ouL'TD 12. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit: N,.C-r=\-A .N' Lye, t'Tot-N) LA.)01.16%. i \ B 3 13. Site and vicinity maps (refer to application instructions): 14. Additional information: 15. VARIANCE CRITERIA If the applicant is seeking a variance, the applicant must include a written justification) narrative addressing the following criteria as specified in Section 173-14-150 of the Washington Administrative Code: A. Development On Land. 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the applicatibn of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other'permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. B. Development either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within marshes, bogs, or swamps: . 1. That -the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example .from:deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute -a' grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 6. That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ssCITYOFRENTON 99 I oiu c S LANDc_z1Z,5ax be n rn cer 'fI,. being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971,. and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. LY-11 Signature Subscribed-and sworn to me this 9 day of42211 Not y Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 4(0 April 15, 1983 oloOe City of Renton F 3 C i ty Hall gg3 Renton, WA 98055 Q ham' P Q Attention: Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator t. --' '` Subject: Variance to shoreline management act of 1971 related to the construction of a wood deck at the residence of Mr. & Mrs. Louis Andersen of 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton, Washington Gentlemen: We wish to state herewith our reasons for requesting a variance as outlined below. Item 8.0202 - Please be advised that the residence next to Mr. Andersen 's house (south side) sets back only (4) feet. This corner of the residence is a solid brick wall . Item 8.02.03 - There will be no detrimental affect to the public welfare because there is no public access to this area. The addition of the Andersen deck will not be injurious to his next door neighbors because the house to the south is only (4) feet from the concrete bulkhead and the residence to the north is set back approximately 45 feet. Thus there would be no blockage of views. Item 8.02.04 - The variance granted would be in harmony with the general appearance of the area. There are many homes along the lake front with wood decks similar to the proposed Andersen deck. Item 8.02.05 - We feel more harm could be done by not granting a variance than by granting one. First the Andersen house would be unsightly, due to the fact that the house was originally designed to have a wood sun deck. Secondly the house is unsafe due to a large sliding glass door opening to the front of the house 12 feet above the ground. Also this exit would become a primary exit from the house in case of fire. Mr. Andersen feels this deck is a reasonable request due to the structure next door being so close to the water. Mr. Andersen's deck does not extend beyond property already closer to the shore line than what he has applied for. In conclusion, Mr. Andersen feels he has improved his property. Lou Louis L. Andersen 3703 Lake Washington B1vd. N Renton, Washington 98056 es/IcA')/-LeL 14 f/ .-& C 9" I CT! 1;s 3OPR211" i. LLA:sg SHORELINE APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that 1,_ . t\N5D -C":"RS E1 has filed an application for a substan- tial development permit for the construction or develognent of located at: -12 -1 O 2 v © - within Section(s) of Township N, Range in .the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Said develop- ment is proposed to be within and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify the Building Zoning Department, 200 Mi11'Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publication of this notice. Publication dates of this notice are and 3-82 1 IArLlVEWt CAAL_ ESG1Z1P_.I.' PAI k .I UCi AREA. 1 Lots 53 and 54, Block A, 10 Hillman's Lake Washington In FUEL. dI ' c Garden of Eden No. 2, and jeps A i K.= l I-- I shorelands adjoining and1}12--a TZOCiLER '" westerly five feet of form( N. P. Railway adjoining anc south of railway crossing in N.P. Railroad permit of 9-1-36 to Carl Jorgenson Na et al, EXCEPT east 10 feet X 1 ST !G-.1 P - . -- i pWFE LA-INCk I GI for road. 18 ---0 5-Et• CilLy OF PI TON F) ! rpri)F2 1BtipAPR211983 s 0 A BUILDiNC, L. ` ',,G ,,,_.P- ri.u1 r' _. :...0 W E LL 1 NCB 4 i 0 I ---2-LOT -"LA 4E_"=.O'er 1 e // ---go--4--—qp. 6‘ S O U I S1K. M LE NEW A Dr I-r1OW m A.M7.E,1 .SE'tJ Sh N I ECI. id 3-70 3..:. L K. WM. 13 LV C I /// // E.tJTO 1J_ W/5 H_ j 2 I j O f0 4-O'-d'. . i I 1ZEVlsED - 1 3178 ONGR.E.TE- RsULY-i iE.t•o----462 f-- r-• 11; r'' r 2 41 11 WI 11.'1 b SHEET NO. OF lff/2 42.5HJOB 9 e "&.?.tj.:;• 14lie. LA LIU APR 2 1 1983 CALCULATED BY . ...,./ ‘644:5Vie: DATE BULDiNG/Z3NiNG DEPT. CHECKED BY DATE SCALE A/49,14e • h v. i 1 120//.44.1 HHi : : •I i•-•• -I- .i • i- •- , - 1. - • - . , Sie-t.47:.../ z-./. 24? 1 1 ., i e., H . ' : 1... . • - ! - " -:" 17: . . . 40-4».. • 7-Ae.,e• ,... ? /Via A./. : .: I 14,,.C/C; 4, 7"' • 4-6.. 10...... 1,1°' 1.g. Ai... . . ., iii/ c.e,7i : E. oi. iges- t -i- --: - :; . i ; E : . I ; /%?/:f /4° e./44. ZeA,/ i rt. 1 ' •Lild 4 codt=-- e.daii. ! 1 eae$7 441/4. I:., • - .. - :: •' 1- - - , kk.,. ..... ......,P. .., .. ., i -44'...A..P'.L--; 44 444(4`. • #'44,f .L•44dG,. 4. 10 , 4:.5 ... ... -1 - - . .i. ...1f/.1 ------ -1••• •—• .... ••••• i•-• /14070.4144 . a•-• i i .! 1 . 7-1-- : , • .5- 1,:/// 4/1 ! i i limi i ! ; • : 11• 63. DECI4 1 i • ! i ' • r5-7/09441 1 • 4/ 1. ! : 1 I ! i i i i : i i • . ' i14 4fA/040441" 7 ,-;-:-.1- -: - -21.----L-.. .i ! . ! ' ; i ; 777.t.- .. ----' 7---7.--7----;—. " -. 1 i 1. Eu.R'OzE-E.1..) am....... AK-.:As, k7k1 OCNT.014-7 L.... ; : - :4-i-to" ' • L. • " '... '! . • -.•1-- ,\ - 141Ho‘ii.7--- ; i 1:-.)(5e.. , , it'll 1:1 1 • T. LQ TH . i-7-1.?"*. t.. ' . Ai\7.-• 4....;. .MIZ$ .. L-00 1 =. t•.)0gW.50 : 7as t .r.r.ED't ..). .(.).... 1,-,... . I TO' whom it may. concern: We the undersigned neighbors of Mrs & Mrs , Louis Andersen1 Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 197] to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face(froni of their home located at .370 , Lake Washington Blvd, North, Renton,Washington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor- hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE 2,/ -1 (: Z49 A) cA/ i6 A/, 4- 9gc s FY/4 iftde feiplek ) te.4( fozs r., ,/r(7) R 04/ /VI:I11/ 111 )/7) 71(,"1(.." )'/C•6,(- >IPL. • c„; $ APR 21 1983 BUiLDING!23NiiNG To whom it may. concern: ' We the undersigned neighbors of Mr , & Mrs , Z,puis Andersen? Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 1971 to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face (front of their home located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. NorthlRenton,Washington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor- hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE 4}t a rf) 3g05 d1.4( D3a. . j . 7 u f n fr.x i To wfiom it may. concern: We . the undersigned neighbors of Mrt & Mrst Louis Andersen, Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 197: to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face(fron. of their home located at .3703 Lake Washington Blvd. NorthlRenton,Washington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor• hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE Ink t.1 1 CITY OF RENTON k____, SHORELINE 1( MANAGEMENT 4"A ACT OF 1 4_k, ____ _L r I1Ti A.1 'PR.ox Loc;.H-. 1 VN AGE.. MAY IN,`og- OwttL_\c-!- S 10. 1 A CREEK Lia7,- iik iini4 16111411 ,..,,-_-_-„__ ____-----1 Pli Mil1 \\_,LAKE LIIIre_. i irR-' VO4 ; WASHINGTON 1K wJ ji IlleRamilitf___ _ rAtli, r 11 r%ai, lI i_ l.li*V-VilEmaid 1 n - IfinliTAIONIVI h r , CEDAR RIVER k• J. e( 6 I . C BLACK i IIII. imp A e/1\ ' R I VER w_i/ •. t111 @ rII. wI\ SPR I NGBROOK I 7r7.2fr I ill r CREEK 11 4 1 III 1/--- 4) ,.... imiNIMINIC'"Atilli NAitilit- ...__-.41% 0 ) i VINkah- 4_. )101.1rislit II 1-_c___ ___ Arla IDu 11 -- ri. 1111PliKerigibfrai14111 IN a eN.0,„, 11I.. ii _pi' IN 1 I 11111 110 ;'--- GREEN C - _ RIVER I L [ k-- I ---— --- - LAKE r 1 ] - ____ _ U 1 vitza1-7: , _. ______ ,____i_ _ _. .• 11 r""- D IIit YOUNGS SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS Any construction of $1,000 value or more (with certain exceptions) or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use require a substantial develop- ment permit in wetlands of shorelines of statewide significance as well as shorelines. Wetlands are defined as those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directions, as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark, and all marshes, bogs, swamps, floodways, river deltas and floodplains associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of the Act. In the CityofRentonthefollowingbodiesofwaterareregulatedbytheAct: CEDAR RIVER, GREEN RIVER; LAKE WASHINGTON; MAY CREEK BETWEEN LAKE WASHINGTON AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE ROAD AND MAY CREEK IN THE S.E. QUARTER OF THE S.E. QUARTER OF SECTION 32-24N-5E; SPRINGBROOK CREEK NORTH FROM GRADY WAY TO THE BLACK RIVER; AND THE BLACK RIVER WESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS. CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON OUTLINE OF PERMIT PROCEDURE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT• 1. The applicant obtains the permit forms , completes and returns to the Planning Department. 2. Applicant puts public notice in newspaper of general circu- lation in Renton once a week for. two weeks . 3. Interested parties may submit comments to Renton Planning Department for thirty (30) days following last public notice. 4. After at least thirty (30) days from last public notice, Renton Planning Department grants or denies permit. 5. Within eight (8) days from the Renton Planning Department action, copies of the action taken and the application form shall be submitted to the State of Washington Department of Ecology, and the office of the State Attorney General. 6. If permit is granted, permittee cannot begin construction until thirty (30) days after date permit is granted. If permittee is informed that a review of the permit is to be held by the Shore- lines Hearings Board then he must further delay construction until the review is completed. 7 . The minimum time required to process a permit is 68 days. 8 . If permit is denied, applicant may appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board, as outlined below. APPEAL PROCEDURE Appeal initiated by Department of Appeal initiated by the applicant Ecology or State Attorney General or by a private party 1. Either the Department of Ecology or 1. Any person, including the applicant, Attorney General may request review aggrieved by the granting or denying of the granting or denying of a permit of a permit may request an appeal. within thirty (30) days of the action The request is sent to the Department of the Renton Planning Department. of Ecology, the Attorney General, and Notice is sent to the Renton Planning the Shorelines Hearings Board. Department and the Shorelines Hearings Board. 2. The Shorelines Hearings Board conducts 2. Either the Department of Ecology or a review as requested and accepts or the Attorney General must certify the overturns the decision of the City of request as valid for the review to Renton. continue. Certification must be given withing thirty (30) days. 3. Any party to the review may appeal the Shorelines Hearings Board decision 3. If the request is certified, the to Superior Court. Shorelines Hearings Board conducts a review and sustains or overturns the decision of the City of Renton. 4. Any party who fails to obtain a certi- fication or any party to a review before the Shorelines Hearings Board may appeal to Superior Court. City of Renton Planning Department Revised May 1976 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM , r;j z1 [.1 V7 APR 211983 EL; .T\(:i/ . t,I'd N , DisiJ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. S/YI - /O.j-J131. V- 03o -43 .... Environmental Checklist No. F - of 7- I',3 PROPOSED. date:FINAL , date: aDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of None-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the -license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. - Name of Proponent 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 0- LK _ t4 o . N I P I S'd015 Co 228 - 8 G 3, Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 1 . c b" 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: NA. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : 1O '"1, Oro , YV c,( Li OC b t*4 vN "OG- K I• B PS FROM 2.t c i't_©ot -. « d G' 40us c t A.'-T- o tV 4- Fi R R 0 M S..t. t Q V o cY2 2- r. • r 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : W oa°D N EC1L AS 1 'SC'(Z.\S C.0 \ t AQrt c.A 1/4— 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : L,] 1 S 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Tau [ tvG PttA ,T ' Sti#c Lrt_tNt= VA2tf., %c 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: 6 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain : Y© 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? TES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? TE5 MAYBE ITS d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features?YES WOW NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? v YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? v Trr MATTE 51 Explanation: J a 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air V quality?Y MATTE NO b) , The creation of objectionable odors? RUNE 0- c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or . regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? 7/ YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES WET NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • YET— MAYBE TO— M Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? JL Y MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through f interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? IZ YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? V YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?YES UTNE WU— Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)?17ET— .RATTE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or v endangered species of flora? YES RTTFE NO c) Introduction of new species .of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S MAYBE TY— d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?r— M— YBE NO Explanation: 4- 5 ) Fauna. dill the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES Maw NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? l/ YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or Wildlife habitat? YES MA B NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? r/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the Gipresentorplannedlanduseofanarea? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 1/ YET- MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 1 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YET—S MAYBENO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? YET-RTTEr WiT Explanation: I 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?fL YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand . J for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? Y M YBE, NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? V YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ESY MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? f YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? v YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? V YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MMAYbE NO Explanation: 15) . Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use .of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? V YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Y MAYBE O Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities:• a) Power or natural gas? I/ YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES— MAYBE NO c) Water? Y YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? IV YET— MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? Y S M YBE f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? ESS— MAYBE IW Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive , site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES M YBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or will ul lack o fulLA isclosure on my part. Proponent:Oh i(signed i name printe City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 r FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SM-105-83, V-030-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-0 17-83 Description of Proposal:Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow said deck into the rear yard setback, along Lake Washington. Proponent: Louis L. Anderson Location of Proposal: 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 4, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, James Matthew, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC, on application ECF-017-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Louis L. Anderson, DATED April 12, 1983. 2. Applications: Substantial shoreline development permit (SM-105-83), Variance V-030-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Police Department, Building and Zoning Department and Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. SIGNATURES: lCl l ri o Itonald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director 0 4 -4 • ems, Ric rd C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: May 9, 1983 APPEAL DATE: May 23, 1983 Date circulated :.J ;,L 26, 1983 Comments- ;Je : MAY 3, 1983 ERVIRONHEPTAL CHECf LIS1 REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 83 APPLICATION N o (s ) . SM-105-83 (SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) PROPONENT : LOUIS L. ANDERSON PROJECT TITLE : N/A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE PERMIT TO MEOW A SUNDECK WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON LOCATION : PROPERTY IX C:A'u'E2 AT 3703 LAKE WASHING'TON BLVD. NO. SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (0 ) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE w INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : , X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air duality : X 3 ) Water & eater courses : Li ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X Y 8 ) Land Use ; north : SINC,T E FAMILY RESIDENTIAL east : SINC,T F FAMILY RESIDENTIAL south : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL west : LAKE WPSHINGTON land use conflicts : MINIMAL V i e u obstruction : POSSIBLE FROM RESIDENCE TO NORTH y f 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Duellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic imparts : 14 ) Public services : . X , I 15 ) Energy : , . X 16 ) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health : X . 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures : onald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director e ,64La,44, - Ri and C. Houghton,9 Public Works Director OF RED s p Z IN c3TicE P09- ED soZE City of Renton Land lUse Hearing Examiner will hold a puBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MAY 31, 1983 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FILE SM-105-83 AND V-030-83 fl REZONE From To Li SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION . of . Lots. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM Ei SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/VARIANCE FOR SETBACKS GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCAILL) AT 3703 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NO, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT JNON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON May 31, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HARRISON SHORT PLAT Application to short plat 1.78 acres into four (4) lots with two (2) variances, allowing a private street and a reduction of its width, and a waiver application for curbs and sidewalk, File Sh. P1. 014-83, V-015-83, V-016-83 and W-017-83; located at 1832 N.E. 20th Street. HANCHEROFF SHORT PLAT Application to short plat 305,000 square feet of property into two (2) lots for a proposed doctor's/medical office and a. variance from Section 4-1102(8) of the Subdivision Ordinance to allow access to Lot #2• by an..established easement, File Sh. Pl. 023-83 and V-024-83; located at 1600 Eagle-Ridge.Drive. LOUIS ANDERSON Application for a substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow the deck into the rear yard setback within ten (10) feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington, File SM-105-83 and V-030-83; located at 3703 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON May 31, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR.OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : May 20, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the I day of May, 1983. n nQSQo FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SM-105-83, V-030-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-017-83 Description of Proposal:Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence with a variance to allow said deck into the rear yard setback, along Lake Washington. Proponent: Louis L. Anderson Location of Proposal: 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 4, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, James Matthew, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-017-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Louis L. Anderson, DATED April 12, 1983. 2. Applications: Substantial shoreline development permit (SM-105-83), Variance V-030-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Police Department, Building and Zoning Department and Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. SIGNATURES: 2 itonald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric b rd C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: May 9, 1983 APPEAL DATE: May 23, 1983 Date circulated : `APRIL 26,. 1983 Comments due : MAY 3, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SM-105-83 (SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) PROPONENT : LOUIS L. ANDERSON PROJECT TITLE : N/A Brief Description of Project :APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE PERMIT MALLOW A SUNDECK WITHIN 10 FEM.' OF THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON LOCATION : PROPERTY Loma)D AT 3703. LAKE LASHING'ION BLVD. NO. SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : Li ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : SINGLE, FAMILY RESIDENTIAL east : SINGT F FAMILY RESIDENTIAL south : SINC;T T FAMILY RESIDENTIAL west : LAKE WASHINGTON land use conflicts : MINIMAL View obstruction : POSSIRTR FROM RESIDENCE TO NORTH 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/E.mployment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic imparts : 14 ) Public services :X I 15 ) Energy : X 16) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health: X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 1 1 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures: onald G. Nelson Lvid R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director and C. Houghton, Public Works Director N. ... 0 TI., .--:, ,..E-.. r , ., -, i.' f 4 ~ , 1 " ( t' Vey L,.ENVIRONMENTAL ti' r.c ,r.. - ,A n: i• '' . r APPLICATION NO. : , ECF 017.-83.,, . r. . ". N., ; , l. . . . .. , PROPOSED- ACTION APPLI CAT ION.GFOR,'SL 'ANTRAL SFORELINE DEVELOP1ENT ' .., PERMIT TO ALLOW A SLACK'.&``APPLICATION FOR:;VARIAlC TO ALLOW DECK- INTO REAR YARD. _,, r SETBACK; . GENERAL LOCATION ANDCO R' ADDRESS - PROPERTY,LOCATED AT 3703 LAKE WAS!-JINGTON.'BLVD.. ' 0.'' POSTED, TO , 'NOTIFY''' INTERESTED: : PERSONS , OF, ,AN-C.""' ENVIRONMENTAL.• ACTION.' .,. : THE ,-,CITY- OF RENTON .,';ENVIRONMENTAL ' •REVIEW ' COMMITTEE t E.R;.C.) "'HAS, ...DETERMINED THAT:,THE: :_ PROPOSED _ACTION, , .. • ,. j ; y I' am , S DOES::: DOES NOT . . s. HAVE A SIGNIFICANT.;;•ADVERSE.IMPACT ' ON THE ENVIRONMENT..-' , F . ` _ . AN- 'ENVIRONMENTAL' .IMPACT ` STATEMENT ram r OWIL ` ' . 1LL NOT BE. REQUIRED. t' AN APPEAL 'OF' '•THE- •ABOVE='; DETERMINATION MAY-, •,,,' B3E ' FILED. WITH-;" THE :'RENTON." HEARINO`.:.EXAMINER ' ;.- , BY: 5;00, R M.,,' MY'93 ',1Q w FOR', FURTHER INFORMATION „ 4 •, CONTACT._THEW•'CITY':OF RENTON., yri BUILDING &':ZONING".D AA, MENT. :: 3,.,. 235-2850 •,.. 4 , In 7 ''.YVnkr ,f V t rJ. 4, •r : 1I tDC7 :N"•OT'' •EMOTE' CST' WITHOUT PROPER A IZ flOIV .,' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: RAX SYSTEMS RESTAURANT (ECF-015-83) Application for building permit to construct a 2,800 square foot fast food restaurant, file B-287; property located at 4114 N.E. 4th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of . non-significance for-the following projects: LOUIS L. ANDERSON (ECF-017-83) Application for substantial shorline development permit to allow a sundeck for a residence and variance application to allow said deck into rear yard setback, file nos. SM-105-83, V-030-83; property located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 23, 1983. Published: May 9, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA May 4, 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. PENDING BUSINESS: ECF-011-83 SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. PP-020-83 Application for preliminary plat approval for a 15-lot single family development on a 3.42 acre tract; property located on the south side of N.E. 20th Street at Kennewick Avenue N.E. ECF-015-83 RAX SYSTEMS RESTAURANT B-287 Application for building permit to construct a 2,800 square foot fast food restaurant; property located at 4114 N.E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS ECF-017-83 LOUIS L. ANDERSON SM-105-83 Application for substantial shoreline development permit to allow V-030-83 a sundeck for a residence and variance application to allow said deck into rear yard setback; located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North. ECF-018-83 AUSTIN COMPANY SP-029083 Application for special permit to allow completion of filling and grading of 29 acre site previously granted under permit No. B-' 6671, file SP-320-79, 100,000 cubic yards proposed; located between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue S.W. and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. INFORMATION: Letter from David R. Clemens to Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch regarding Maple Valley Highway improvement status. City of Tukwila Planning Department For ERC's Review: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Tukwila Bend Office Park. Any comments are due by June 3, 1983. CAT. ar= ci t;,1 a1 tit!";3) Ri P.11 of R4,4, 611 APR 2 1 1983 -) Q z SHORELINE MANAGEMEI .T`-=A=Cf.'O°F '4971 o CITY OF R. ENTON 9.0 40- o9- ED SEPtolk 3IJILDING &- ZONING DEPARTMENT 206) 235-2550 APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. : 3w\•- 1cc5 f2 l -CI''a-n ECF No: "ELGF, - SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Sec-Twnp-R 1,01/9, 3Z- 244' PERMIT Date Received 4- ; - 5m Date Accepted 4- 2,t- E)lo CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved Date Denied ri VARIANCE Publication Date AFF Comprehensive Plan jA)G>d Fl rnii_( EXEMPTION Zoning o 6t G+1 tpimiOr Water Body l._ \iNc, UJ ,i MCA t c ra, hcAmer In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note permit procedure on the last page) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS l THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1. Name of Applicant L o k- S L F—tWDG 2. Mailing Address-- j7 0 9 E c Telephone: 212 e, - s 3. Applicant is: O_Owner El Lessee Contract Purchaser Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) Sty B 0 5 Cs) e, A s 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : .,e„S 3 4 c - A -11 t\A(,N S L/KG V Ll S 1 N. G,'1 C11\ 'e! C f) ft- `a \i N`1/4-(0/-,L 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands:) 8. Intended use of property: t \ 9. Generally_ describe the property and existing improvements: \PP'k cJLN IE.C,i , Vicki IS) D O \ CLU W 10. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: io ® Q z c2 B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested: Begin L U L V-1 e End iLLt- 1 11. Does this project require a shoreline location? Explain. T c h ,NjSH L.5‘N) CC-\< \I0uL7 12. List any other permits for this project from state:, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit: 1 C t= t- ,\C, 1,11 C N 1 L_ =V=1-_ P M C NT ' k 9 13. Site and vicinity maps (refer to application instructions): 14. Additional information: 15. VARIANCE CRITERIA If the applicant is seeking a variance, the applicant must include a written justification) narrative addressing the following criteria as specified in Section 173-14-150 of the Washington Administrative Code: A. Development On Land. 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for. example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. B. Development either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within marshes, bogs, or swamps: 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 6. That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ssCITYOFRENTON I, LQu i S f\ND '2,5&- being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of -1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 4-.1.:.. . LY-1-1, 4-:S,----71-e-- --.2:L=7—' ‘'.4---- ) Signature Subscribed -and sworn to me this 9 ° day of j .422,d at c..i Not y Public in and for the State ] of C/%! Washington, residing at2 4 April 15, 1983 1:;-e.\\ City of Renton Eya` 3 City Hall 3 ga3 Renton, WA 98055 2 1 Attention: Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator e,tp Subject: Variance to shoreline management act of 1971 related to the construction of a wood deck at the residence of Mr. & Mrs. Louis Andersen of 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton, Washington Gentlemen: We wish to state herewith our reasons for requesting a variance as outlined below. Item 8.0202 - Please be advised that the residence next to Mr. Andersen's house (south side) sets back only (4) feet. This corner of the residence is a solid brick wall . Item 8.02.03 - There will, be no detrimental affect to the public welfare because there is no public access to this area. The addition of the Andersen deck will not be injurious to his next door neighbors because the house to the south is only (4) feet from the concrete bulkhead and the residence to the north is set back approximately 45 feet. Thus there would be no blockage of views. Item 8.02.04 - The variance granted would be in harmony with the general appearance of the area. There are many homes along the lake front with wood decks similar to the proposed Andersen deck. Item 8.02.05 - We feel more harm could be done by not granting a variance than by granting one. First the Andersen house would be unsightly, due to the fact that the house was originally designed to have a wood sun deck. Secondly the house is unsafe due to a large sliding glass door opening to the front of the house 12 feet above the ground. Also this exit would become a primary exit from the house in case of fire. Mr. Andersen feels this deck is a reasonable request due to the structure next door being so close to the water. Mr. Andersen's deck does not extend bdyond property already closer to the shore line than what he has applied for. In conclusion, Mr. Andersen feels he has improved his property. NoutS om ---- Louis L. Andersen 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. N Renton, Washington 98056 1? /I, 4.2k- 311 ApF, 21 A983 LLA:sg SHORELINE APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that 1.._cl u i S L . N CR S'EI has filed an application for a substan- tial development permit for the construction or development of 122)L located at: 0 7 u , (y ` -V' 1V 0 WC N 1 AS i-4. . Cl S C) S- within Section(s) of Township N, Range in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Said develop- ment is proposed to be within and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify the Building Zoning Department, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publication of this notice. Publication dates of this notice are and 3-82 r---- 0 cz.N5VAI'1 J AL_ ESC21P_T_I PA2K.t,1C1 1 Atzc.. Lots 53 and 54, Block A, 1 Hillman's Lake Washington al EUEI•. CSiL: Q Garden of Eden No. 2, and=- xAax. r o li I shorelands adjoining and I 7 1ZOCI.E westerlyfive feet of form( N.N. P. Railway adjoining anc 1.- a-n" south of railway crossing in N.P. Railroad permit of 9-1-36 to Carl Jorgenson tl et al, EXCEPT east 10 feet EX 15T.1 KIG . . - Dw.EL.LIt`Iq 6) for road. m IB.r0__ — 5-to• iY RE1170m i 0 ,F- I 1[9 1 , 11 Vi [5.: {i)ill APR 21 1983 0 Bun.I;N :Drin, t riin 0 7 x"1 ST 11.1Gil_2 r— _::.:C5WELLI1•1 .. 4 77 0.T A R. MKS Louis LENEVI! ApQ T1OJ t A.I .R.SE'L) SUN i ECk. O a703.:_ LK. Wlll. i3LVC t.ITOIN-VVAS H. f 7..9'7 P."._ ._. 4O_cr 0 1zEVlSE[-) - 19I78 - c01.lG .TER.E Pauoc-i- ra - 5--- oc K: .... . ---.- ii In rli;2' rtl til vri 3 I t. '''::3 il 1 UL, APR 211983 L JOB SHEET NO. / 74 i ,/ Az5i , /7:,,,,,,,,,;,:-. ..-. OF CALCULATED BY .G7-a1:4 ,,e• DATE Ze9/1277774C7 BUIL.DiNGIZONil3 DEPT. CHECKED BY DATE SCALE A/a.06' • h i : L : gizz!.‘dews. ' /142 1 .1 : i. •;. . i.. ! . ..1. ' .. 37.07 4' I 1‘ .ei ! • • i i . A.EAtrok? . 4,-, ...) ." ._.. __________-- '... • i ; : . 6440,/ .: ' . . .li : . ., , . . I i . . i 1 . . . .: . . : . 4/?‘/C9,vr-.". - rn: . 1. ot :04. ie;e4.*, ik••• , to... .. 1A. .oza. ....:1/.• . .14 . .: • 4.4 -•-•/i •E - , _ •••/),,e.: _ifife - . i 4/A./. 4,,,, ezo0 , iv , - -- 1 ..-. - .: ...- --- •i• -... •...-H• - - - : • •• - - --± -i.-----,.....- •- - ... -...4 " 4- 1-1- ik ' . - - r•1 isA.. ; .... ._.10. ..i... : • A. .L-.; 1 ..... 4:::?*ok..4, 01... . .. . i4/A ...44 44• . . . 14 . 1 N . .. _......i ,.•ifA>. 1 gig,il7Ziti e/144415 - - -! .. • . . -. "'''" - - . - " -- i..... ... 1. ..---.!......i..... ..•. ... ..;..... . •p,k4if. ..i. . . .. ....,...J. .. :1,1e' c.,.)' .Dm. g.. 1 17. 4' . I ''' '' 1 . - 11 -,----- - ; •7---,_ ----,----- , : . , i----:.---! \ , , , 5Wogire.,44 ' ‘. A : : 11.DinC.14- ..... .. 1.. ..... -T.77 ...! 79... 17.‘.)..60-k• .__ 7---- i• , :--------.- • 1 .i..4_, :: . nii,o 6..,,v,z.7,04.5,.. 1 .!. i \ - 7-- i, is..;..L.... AN K, As1-11.00.17.-0 L 4-°. E • .:... .. .E.L_E•NI, .: 1.4 1-=.(:).1.` A. 5.1-,:. . ..! . .. 7-7—....L........!............-...... .i, ,-,-,,.--------_...___ - 1 L_________, 1--->. L._.- r... . t. c..of.*t,.. . i . 1V..\AZ...4.; . M.14,S • L..o.. k 74. t•jOgr.Ze!O . L... i. . -7. o.2 1,(4.:. ),...)o • .R., L,ur-- ,. 1,,) c .. : 7.77... ... .. Taza.t.47TV.*„.. (..)._ NJ.. : . s .. . . :. . I o -Whom it may. concern: We the undersigned neighbors of Mrs $ MIS , Louis Andersen? Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 197: to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face(fron• of their home located at .370 Lake Washington Blvd. NorthlRenton,Washington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor. hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE 4-7' 37 ' 7 LG 49 4. &YI) A/Z1- 72- c/t.i io A/, 42 h 9g g s 25s--- 3 6/ J/ $/ l ` 6 69, 7 0 fel4.41 ) (-14( 04/ yV y 2(J ffeti 7 ,1 /.c.21• 1 4C, d- / c.,71 i2-1(--e7( 0 Z2-1 c) APR 21 1983 BUILD NGiZoiaici To whom it may. concern: We the undersigned neighbors of Mr , & Mrs , Louis Andersen? Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 1971 to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face(front of their home located at 3703 Lake Washington Blvd. NorthlRenton,Was•hington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor- hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE Vr r1L ,1 r f 3805 ci4( A 1 To ,wfiom it may. concern: We • the undersigned neighbors of fir, $ Mrs , Louis AnderSent Petition the Renton Planning commission to grant a variance of the shoreline management act of 197: to allow the construction of a wood deck to be installed on the west face(froni of their home located at .3703 Lake Washington Blvd, NorthlRenton,Washington. We agree that the addition of this deck would improve the general appearance of the said residence and hence improve the general appearance of the neighbor. hood. NAME ADDRESS DATE CITY OF RENTON l :;I 1 a SHORELINE V I pMANAGEMENTt• II ACT- OF 1971 ii T Ji _. __ 4k % 1- I 1 A.i.=Pk20x 1_0c Hr" - A1= itimumI MAY R,\ off OWN6 Ncl S 1'CREEK II P-# 14.. 4 47*l. N ig l- i Rcs ntvcC r,,, N p I LAKE L WASHINGTON 1 i',- a ,4wJ — MI limitr1141010 - • 11 1 I'5. f Mr. .. N-qe= pegm FL _"- 1411• , r I, CEDAR RIVER p e 1 -) - -:L_ s I f . th.1 C BLACK lI' 1 1111 A 11 I RIVER ko: - " Pa 1 I ' wr' I SPRINGBROOK I— -- CREEK 11 y 1 111 W mminsfflift.--- — lizurmiam 1 0' 1 VIII4W— 4- 4\71,- Atlir--. :UKim11 iii,"...„._. ,. rm. isurinv ,,,, a* It1 t arkillill graCtra kaill1 i i 11101181 7.6.• Va; 1 1 <. 1 ,, ..=. sia 1 - MI. E GREEN rlC I RIVER 1 LAKE 1.. 3 1 I i i^I1 1 Ja17.7 .u._._. ____L__ '.___1_. . ._ ...a YOUNGS SHORELIIE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS Any construction of $1,000 value or more (with certain exceptions) or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use require a substantial develop- ment permit in wetlands of shorelines of statewide significance as well as shorelines. Wetlands are defined as those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directions, as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark, and all marshes, bogs, swamps, floodways, river deltas and floodplains associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of the Act. In the CityofRentonthefollowingbodiesofwaterareregulatedbytheAct: CEDAR RIVER, GREEN RIVER; LAKE WASHINGTON; MAY CREEK BETWEEN LAKE WASHINGTON AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE ROAD AND MAY CREEK IN THE S.E. QUARTER OF THE S.E. QUARTER OF SECTION 32-24N-5E; SPRINGBROOK CREEK NORTH FROM GRADY WAY TO THE BLACK RIVER; AND THE BLACK RIVER WESTERLY TO THE CITY LIMITS. CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON OUTLINE OF PERMIT PROCEDURE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT , 1. The applicant obtains the permit forms , completes and returns to the Planning Department. 2. Applicant puts public notice in newspaper of general circu- lation in Renton once a week for two weeks . 3. Interested parties may submit comments to Renton Planning Department for thirty (30) days following last public notice. 4. After at least thirty (30) days from last public notice, Renton Planning Department grants or denies permit. 5. Within eight (8) days from the Renton Planning Department action, copies of the action taken and the application form shall be submitted to the State of Washington Department of Ecology, and the office of the State Attorney General. 6. If permit is granted, permittee cannot begin construction until thirty (30) days after date permit is granted. If permittee is informed that a review of the permit is to be held by the Shore- lines Hearings Board then he must further delay construction until the review is completed. 7 . The minimum time required to process a permit is 68 days. 8 . If permit is denied, applicant may appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board, as outlined below. APPEAL PROCEDURE Appeal initiated by Department of Appeal initiated by the applicant Ecology or State Attorney General or by a private party 1. Either the Department of Ecology or 1. Any person, including the applicant, Attorney General may request review aggrieved by the granting or denying of the granting or denying of a permit of a permit may request an appeal. within thirty (30) days of the action The request is sent to the Department of the Renton Planning Department. of Ecology, the Attorney General, and Notice is sent to the Renton Planning the Shorelines Hearings Board. Department and the Shorelines Hearings Board. 2. The Shorelines Hearings Board conducts 2. Either the Department of Ecology or a review as requested and accepts or the Attorney General must certify the overturns the decision of the City of request as valid for the review to Renton. continue. Certification must be given withing thirty (30) days. 3. Any party to the review may appeal the Shorelines Hearings Board decision 3. If the request is certified, the to Superior Court. Shorelines Hearings Board conducts a review and sustains or overturns the decision of the City of Renton, 4. Any party who fails to obtain a certi- fication or any party to a review before the Shorelines Hearings Board may appeal to Superior Court. City of Renton Planning Department Revised May 1976 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM r• on r, vi IL APR 211983 BL$!LDIN 0 2'IU3 F)EE T. FOR QUICE USE ONLY ' Application No. 5 M - /D5 4,-.3 It,- 030 -(3 Environmental Checklist No. 0/ 7- 1..3 PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date: ElDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance EJ Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. ' Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the -license for which you are currently applying .or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. - Name of -Proponent L.c,u i 5 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: r c- LK -WN _ C2S1._\1 sJ 22 e) 3- Date Checklist submitted B 4. Agency requiring Checklist t"C trt,:i-rdt--% a 1"-" r" 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: A 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : 141". O ')( 2,G'.. O FROM 2. )7 -1..c o1E- d c r'c A t,A L9 R N. 0' i S T- s-r% tom, 2.. 't? S'L—a® s>' eV> N s 2- r 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : o a 1> S V tv T.1 As N QTtGR1._ 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the, proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : u 1 "n 1 N Cl) '" oc L'=C"M % S1-}0 Re t.,3 W 1,.:, V A21 fa N 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your propoosal ? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: CoPcc A-c- - c c II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MMAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? v YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? V TES VTR' TO-- Explanation: 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air V quality? YES RUNE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? V YES MAYBE N- c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? 1/ YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? V YES VW NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES M YBE Nh f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? JL YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? V YES M YBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available vforpublicwatersupplies?YES MAYBE N Explanation:. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES M BE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES Win" NO c) Introduction of new species :of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES FaTtir NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. 4ill the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES M YBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any uhique, rare or endangered species of fauna? V YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? Pi YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or Wildlife habitat? f/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE N5— Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Yam- MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 1/ YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? v YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES RAM- NU- Explanation: J v r 5 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?f YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand . for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE, NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or l movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Z YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? v YES MAYBE NO b) ' Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? v YES MAYBE NO d) - Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance •of public facilities, including roads? V • YES MAYBE NO- f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) . Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) - Use .of substantial amounts 'of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NU— b) ' Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 7E7 RITE 0 Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? V YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? Y S MAYBE NO c) Water? Y YES MAYBE NO 6- e d) Sewer or septic tanks? v YET— MAYBE au- e) Storm water drainage? YET- RATITE N- f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding. mental health)? tr` YES MAYBE Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 1/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES M•TYBE- NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or will ul lack o full_oisclosure on my part. Proponent:Dy signe d • A1L71 2 1=1 name printe City of Renton Planning Department 5-76