HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-056 (2)BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE MiCROFILMED
Affidavit of Publication
l
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
Cindy StruppPP being first duly sworn on
O C T 1 2 1983
oath,deposes and says that Sheisthe chief clerk
of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a
week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,
L 1 wzQJ1 W 22 i0 UQS]ILandUseHearinga)g aPamwoy z T8
Washington.That the annexed is a U
03 o
S,c o
F—w J a o F- •v 0 o Q
6-, CC
c m cFwmawrn 0 5 ca'aDin
O > o ,m °'cn°-0wco~gcn -0m'c,
Z m Q o
c'
w 0°=z w c N T
a o ww¢w~OW¢ o E co
V roF-OF O rn0 ,,cc .c o Q
as it was published in regular issues(and o m o, z az
o w O L U m
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period o
c t.
o
z w z a N z a rn
o a,a) o¢0¢wwCrOa o
cn+» eN U)<COMwF-O 0oi
of
onea
consecutive issues,commencing on the o-'
c o' to$ 6 cc N a_c
C 6 Vj CZ Q .o c O D C c0 o_cd Q,
a., a cm'- m F- cr axw VS
9th September 83 2_cc
g3 c0r ; a000,a8
day of P 19 and ending the 0 ari> z m o a>LL
z} 7) cC a c.9
Z Q 4)th
oo0c m U¢cLso03) 2w
day of 19 both dates Eax 5cc0 445 a~ci a 3coQO o c m mQ
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-m LL o o w y_0 a_U >,- o a Z 2 t E o,.,
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 0- Ti")
LL 3 2 Q
03
U a o ' m N m 0 a 9 ° 0 3 LE
27 . 00whichchar
has been paid in full attedfortheotheratebofat
per folio of one hundred words for the w w of 3 _
w O c0 O 05
g 2
o
d1.o
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent a)
LL
8.Z D z Z Z¢Z o U F-Z a
w--w c n -
insec.......:-..
ion.
O w w
Z
X op Q S w U,F-w w
Z
Ch d U o > n rn
Z
F-UZW<W
F_Zm¢OoOC7O b
V OmozzJQ=C[zi_JZWO5.Q'4 mw r
Chief Clerk a aWwZmioZUJ m~=. .
aCzwoawZgw-QQwgO°a nd0
Cam-a.Ux•3F-du.2 a V-- `c
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
9th day of
September, 1983
l
C/7 *f
Notary Public in for the State of Washington,
residing at Xlri€?King County.
Feclrl- Way
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
9th, 1955.
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
U
VN#87 Revised 5/82
1
OF R
t$ Q ° THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
1aLL
IMMO f BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9
0
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 - 2593
gTFD SEP1 -
s-
October 13, 1983
Mr. Bruce Rowe
1313 E. Prospect Street
Seattle, WA 98112
RE: BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO. (Van Daal, Inc.)
SA-056-83
Dear Mr. Rowe:
The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on
September 27, 1983, has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by
ordinance. Therefore, this matter,is considered final and is being transmitted to the City
Clerk this date for filing.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required.
Sincerely,
Fred J. Kau?nan
Land Use Hearing Examiner
F J K:se
0286E
cc: City Clerk -
Building & Zoning Department
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
SUE ELLISTON being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes and states:
That on the 27th dayof September 19 83 affiant
it
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
elSubscribedandswornthis day of () c 19$3 .
c._ _ Se_eA-
Nota Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Renton 1
Application, Petition or Case: BEVAART CONSTRUCTION (Daal ) SA-056-83
The minute's contain a U t 06 the pahti.ez 06 necond. )
September 27, 198
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION.
APPLICANT: BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
FILE NO. SA-056--83
LOCATION: 3700 West Valley Highway
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval to allow a 40' x 120'
column supported roof addition over an existing asphalt
work area/truck load area.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department
Recommendation: Approval, subject to modification of
building plans.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Denial.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on September 14, 1983.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning
Department Report, examining available
information on file with the application and
field checking the property and surrounding
area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing
on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on September 20, 1983, at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following documents were entered into the record as exhibits:
Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, star
report and other pertinent documents
relating to posting and publication.
Exhibit #2: Site plan showing the existing structure and
the proposed addition.
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He stated the applicant is
applying for his client, Van Daal, Inc., who owns the building and wants to cover their work area
of 4,800 sq. ft., to be located on the north side of the existing building.
Mr. Blaylock further noted the request does not specifically meet the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan of providing a park-like setting for manufacturing operations. This would
be located close to the street without being screened. The Policy Development Department has
recommended that the western and northern sides of this addition be enclosed to minimize
adverse appearance from storage of materials and supplies; and that the Fire Department is
requiring sprinklers be installed in the addition.
Mr. Blaylock reported the staff recommends approval of the request, subject to the
modification of the building to require solid walls on the west side and a solid wall or loading
doors on the north side.
The Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or representative. Responding was:
Bruce Rowe
1313 E. Prospect Street
Seattle, WA 98112
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056-83
September 27, 1983
Page 2
Mr. Rowe stated he was Chairman of the Board of Van Daal, Inc.; that he started the company
in 1960; that he was appearing on behalf of the President of the company; and that he was
owner of record of the building in question. He noted he made reference to this because he
wanted the Examiner to note his interest in the property and in the business. Mr. Rowe further
indicated that the building is highly visible from the highway and annual maintenance is already
performed on the building and the landscaping to maintain an attractive site. He presented the
Examiner with 13 photographs showing pictures of the Van Daal building and other surrounding
businesses.
The Examiner entered the photographs into the record as follows:
Exhibit #3: Thirteen (13) photographs of the Van Daal,
Inc. building and surrounding businesses.
Mr. Rowe stated this is to be a temporary structure and must be removed when Van Daal's lease
expires on the property; that this is not a manufacturing operation, merely cutting the length of
the reinforced steel by machine rather than by hand; they are already marketing the steel.
The Examiner expressed concern whether this activity is permitted on the outside of an
enclosed building and inquired if there was a way this structure could be enclosed.
Mr. Rowe indicated it was a small operation and if they expand any larger, they will have to
move from the present site.
The Examiner indicated he would take under consideration whether they have already outgrown
this facility and this site.
Mr. Rowe pointed out that the operation was not noisy; that he had to approve any
modifications to the building and there is a possibility of moving this operation within the next
two years because of the volume growth for the business.
Discussion was held with respect to installation of sprinklers within the building and whether
this would be required in this instance.
Mr. Rowe suggested Van Daal be required to post a bond for the removal of the structure at the
end of a 2-year period. The Examiner stated he would need some clarification before making
that decision. Mr. Rowe indicated he is willing to cooperate with the City to show their good
intentions.
Mr. Blaylock suggested the area immediately west of the building be landscaped and that a
partial wall be installed to eliminate any visual impact and reduce noise, and the installation of
loading doors on the north side.
The Examiner called for further testimony. There being none offered, the hearing was closed at
10:10 a.m. The Examiner reported he would issue his decision within 14 days.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicants, Bevaart Construction Co., filed a request for approval of a site plan
for a shed addition to a manufacturing building.
2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act
SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other
pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration
of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental
Review Committee (ERC), responsible official.
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056- 83
September 27, 1983
Page 3
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. The subject site is located at 3700 West Valley Highway. The site is on the east side
of the roadway between the roadway and the railroad right-of-way.
6. The subject property consisting of an approximately 3.4 acre lot is relatively level.
7. A manufacturing plant engaged in construction activities including rebar cutting
exists on the subject site.
8. The subject site was annexed into the city in April of 1959 by Ordinance 1745, at
which time it was automatically zoned G (General; Single Family Residential). The
site was reclassified to M-P (Manufacturing Park) in December of 1967 by
Ordinance 2380.
9. The Comprehensive Plan designates the general area in which the subject site is
located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park uses.
10. The applicant, a lessee of the property, has erected an addition to the existing
structure which consists of a column supported roof which save for its connection on
the south side is without walls.
11. The addition is approximately 28 feet tall by 120 long and 40 feet deep. Seven
columns support the long (100) foot length at intervals of 20 feet, while the corner
columns and the north wall of the existing building support the roof structure along
the 40 foot dimension.
12. The addition is intended to protect a large cutting machine from the elements. The
machine's functions are to convey large reinforcing steel rods to a cutting blade
where they are cut to specified dimensions and further conveyed to a location where
a fork lift loads them for transport or storage.
The rods are loaded at one end, cut somewhere near the center of the apparatus, and
removed at the other end. The areas where loading and unloading occur must be
open to provide access for fork lift maneuvers.
13. The lease for the property requires that the structure be removed once the lease
terminates.
14. Staff originally recommended that the structure be enclosed. Additional
recommendations by the Fire Department and the Public Works Department indicate
that the true nature of the applicant's structure was not understood. The
Environmental Checklist submitted indicated that the proposal consisted of a roof to
be placed over an existing asphalted work area/truck load area. The blueprints
submitted with the application identify the proposed structure as a "LOADING
AREA ROOF."
15. The M-P zone requires that outside storage be screened from public view. Further
the intent of the zone as referenced by staff was to create a park like environment
in which certain manufacturing and warehousing operations would take place.
16. The applicant proposed screening the shed along the periphery of the site with
additional plantings and fencing.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The addition does not appear to conform to the goals and policies of the Green River
Valley Comprehensive Plan nor the general Comprehensive Plan. While the
shed-like addition may be an integral part of the applicant's manufacturing
operation the use does not appear to be one allowed unenclosed in the M-P zone.
The outside operation of industrial machinery other than loading equipment would
appear detrimental to the purposes, goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
and to the city's desire to promote and provide aesthitic high quality development in
the Valley which in turn provides a high quality working environment and enhances
the image of the city.
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056-83
September 27, 1983
Page 4
2. Outdoor storage while permitted must be screened from public view (Section
4-730.030 (5)), that is along public roads and sidewalks, and screened from
neighboring properties. This requirement was enacted to insure that manufacturing
uses would provide both a place of employment and an environmentally sound
addition to the city.
Certainly if storage must take place behind screening the primary operation must be
screened from public view to provide a reasonable approximation of a business
park-like atmosphere.
3. While the applicant has already constructed the addition prior to receiving the
necessary approval, the plans seem to have inadvertently misled staff as to the
nature of the addition. The Fire Department indicated that the structure should
contain sprinkler fire protection, the Public Works Department required storm water
retention, and the Building and Zoning Department recommended enclosures.
The labeling of the plans as a "roof for a work area/truck load area" apparently had
the wrong connotation. Staff review treated the area as a covered storage area,
whereas the site contains actual manufacturing processes albeit cutting. This
operation should take place indoors to conform with the policies and goals of the
city, as should any other operation in an M--P zone.
3 If the subject application were approved the city would set a precedent permitting
any ragtag manufacturing operation to take place out of doors, in plain view and in
complete disharmony with the principles, policies and goals of the Comprehensive
Plan regarling manufacturing parks.
Approval of this request would return the city to the past when any type of
manufacturing operation could take place anywhere, in any manner and in any type
of building, shed or assemblage of thrown together structures.
4. The language of this decision should not be read to necessarily criticize the
applicant's addition, although as with most manufacturing equipment it is not very
aesthetic on a relative scale, but as an attempt to avoid a precedent which would
eventually allow all manner of unsightly additions to otherwise well designed
manufacturing plants.
The use the applicant has proposed should be confined within a building in order to
accomplish the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Unfortunately, if the
applicant has outgrown the current structure, a reasonable addition could be
designed which would allow the proposed operation to be accomplished indoors. The
current addition does look as though it were an afterthought and not part of a well
designed manufacturing park building.
DECISION:
The request for site plan approval is denied.
ORDERED THIS 27th day of September, 1983.
Fred J. Kaufma
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of September, 1983 to the parties of record:
Bruce Rowe
1313 E. Prospect Street
Seattle, WA 98112
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056-83
September 27, 1983
Page 5
TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of September, 1983 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)
communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use
decision may not communicate in private with any decision- maker concerning the proposal.
Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the
City Council
All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly
rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for
Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council.
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed
in writing on or before October 11, 1983. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may
make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of
the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such
appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems
proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such
appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other
specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the
Finance Department, first floor of City Hall.
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
RECEIVED
PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON
NEARING EXAMINER
SEPT EMBER 20, 1983 S E P 141983
AM s' PM
Z8t9,I,11d2,1,213,4,516
APPLICANT: BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
FILE NUMBER: SA-056-83
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Applicant seeks site plan approval to allow a 40' x 120' column supported roof
addition over an existing asphalt work area/truck load area.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: VAN DAAL_, INC.
2. Applicant: Bevaart Construction Company
3. Location:3700 West Valley Highway.
Vicinity Map Attached)
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning Department.
5. Size of Property: 4,800 sq. ft. for project within lot
consisting of 3.4 acres.
6.Access: West Valley Highway
7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park
8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park; G-1,
General Use.
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Manufacturing Park.
10. Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on September 9,
1983, and posted in 5 places on or
near the site as required by City
Ordinance on September 9, 1983..
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance 1745 dated April 14, 1959.
Upon annexation into the city, the property was zoned G. The zoning designation
was changed from G to M-P by Ordinance 2380 on December 21, 1967. The site
was filled to its present elevation prior to the establishment of the city's mining,
grading and excavation ordinance.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
I. lopography: The site is relatively level.
2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur).
3. Vegetation: The site contains some scrub grass and shrubs regenerated after
filling of the subject site.
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT TO EXAMINER
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056-83
September 20, 1983
4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site provides some habitat for birds and
small mammals.
5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site.
6. Land Use: The site consists of an existing office/warehouse facility.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The subject site is surrounded by industrial uses.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Water and Sewer: There is an existing 12-inch water main situated along the
Puget Sound Electric right-of-way, along the easterly boundary of the
subject site. An existing 8-inch sewer main is located along Puget Sound
Electric right-of-way. Storm sewer lines are not available; however there is
a drainage ditch east of the subject site.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance
requirements.
3. Transit: Metro Transit Routes No. 154, 158, and 159 operate along West
Valley Highway adjacent to the subject site.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Parks: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District.
2. Chapter 22, Parking and Loading.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENT:
1. Valley Comprehensive Plan.
2. Policies Element, Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, Industrial Goal
and Objectives, p. 18-19.
I.IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1. Natural Systems: Development of the proposed project will not adversely
affect the natural system.
2. Population/Employment: Minor.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social: None.
5. Traffic: None.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of
non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on August
31, 1983. The appeal period expires September 19, 1983.
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT TO EXAMINER
BEVAART CONSTRUCT ION CO.
SA-056-83
September 20, 1983
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
6. City of Renton Policy Development Department.
7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS;
1.The applicant is seeking site plan approval to allow construction of a 40' x
120' column supported roof addition over an existing asphalt work area and
truck loading area. This 4,800 sq. ft. expansion represents an 8.4% increase
in the present building size (56,900 sq. ft.).
The proposal calls for only a covered roof structure and no substantive walls
on either the east, west and north sides.
2. Proposed use specifically complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation
of Manufacturing Park and the current M-P, Manufacturing Park Zoning, of
the subject site. However, the proposal does not specifically meet the intent
of providing a park-like setting for manufacturing operations. The Policy
Development Department has stated its specific concern in relationship to
aesthetics and the placement of a manufacturing operation in a very visible
location without appropriate screening from public rights-of-way and other
properties. They have specifically recommended that the west and northern
walls should be enclosed to minimize adverse appearance from the storage of
materials and supplies. In most situations, manufacturing areas, or storage
areas, have been enclosed and provided with large access doors for operation.
3. Modification of the original site plan resulted in relocation of several parking
places and a need for an additional five spaces based upon the manufacturing
use of the expansion. The following table represents a breakdown of required
parking:
Use Square Feet Parking Required
Offices 6,500 30
Warehouse 35,400 24
Manufacturing
Metal Working/
Door Plant) 15,000 15
Additon 4.800 S
Total 61,700 74
The site plan shows a total of 76 parking spaces provided. No modifications
will be necessary to landscaping along adjacent public rights-of-way or along
perimeter areas.
4. The Fire Department advises that the new addition will be required to be
sprinklered to comply with the sprinkler requirement for the entire building.
5. The Public Works Department advises that drain lines for the area that will
be converted from parking to building will have to be relocated and revised.
In addition, it appears that since there will be an expansion of the sprinkler
system in the development, that the systems development charge may apply.
The applicant should contact Mr. Ron Olson in the Utilities Division.)
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT TO EXAMINER
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
SA-056-83
September 20, 1983
6. The proposed addition does not create an overcrowding of the subject site for
either parking or maneuvering space.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site approval request. File No.
SA-056-83, by Bevaart Construction Company, be approved subject to the modification of
the building to require solid walls on the west side and a solid wall or loading doors on the
north side.
n 1 / (. 1I
JV__ NG{_.` Gi yENR r-\E •rER 0JN/u T,UN c,.1,, NO J j
1
M—P
I
I
Jam- \\ \
G—
O\N a ---* .\'\- I -- —- --— --
II
1 jYTI 1
I.
I
1
1
I 7 j II 1
111
1 1
1 1 ry I
1^
1 S w JS,Si Sff
I
iI 4 1 J
I 1
3pItlQsS. !'Rp Si
Q
a I o
Iz
V
v
W
I
S. W.
M_p
34
0
ii I<
I a
a ii .
1 IEI l
1 i11
Q I
J
i
I W y 6 eaeti 1
1 .Z1c.+s 1
g
1
JiYT/ e,, I 1Fi
0. ,
k
H-1
g4
I 2 o G-1 S W 41SZ
T___r___
I.
I V
11A-p
1
m ---- _ __ I1, ,;‘.._.11,- .1_____?.1--''
o. M-P
i . I I 1 L-1i
VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
SA-056-83
APPLICANT BEVARRT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TOTAL AREA - 3.4 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY
EXISTING ZONING M-P, 'MANUFACTURING PARK
EXISTING USE OFFICE/STORAGE
PROPOSED USE A COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION TO SHEAR BUILDING
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK
COMMENTS
s
I. 1 1TJiIf4
1 f
cr sueE -- 'y' QooF ws t LaPoN 4iceP.voF P..r1EL 51p I
Ii _ --_.._------ ---- Pu P l r4..L-
t_ M..,...-
iiiJ
I L D u'+G1if 5LojS •
1 1ry -. , wzI ><¢4 F g1.,; 1 -I
GI2, NC K+Jt-av/I`‘( !3 /1 s Mgdi1 8 --
GK12145 aJ1sIwAY 5 T'0WL_ Ith.1 j_..G 1-E—;--} ERS.- - -- ------ -- —
1 rs
lx i. N t 2rT l o
w DEAD -t-. l-1 E oyo l.'t - N8 3j_ l
f1 DEaD C21.4E _ ww wF Live Cs-owS
It
L--_ i;' - ---• - - - C-Pact I S t-1 DT To 55 0 4 2 W 1?1-) .J o`^t I-G A D 'p*-? rJ i-, •
i os, SI r! or+ C"°bNE Sjp.71t.1c 'rH15IJ1EMTI
1 i i - Z.: 5?oµa 4E PeNTt•_,I 1
1 w:N EL.-_LOAD - _ 2?? :l 1-aGrl1 DES S j u.1 P 1•
via, _ SE.- . 52 - _.
r.W.-$r4 S15x4Z.9 _ _
a
1.41J. 51vE CLEP•P eE_:J
1'!: Ex15T' a oraG =
a=lst'4 AsFia.p•l.T
e
l I1 r
7--,...7,
A#
O.,-\4W0,"..
p fA• THO
f.i t,..._.,,....,.
1.4e 1.._..A n 1r OP " .r 1 a I . 1:::._.... f I'I
4 C4 ol FTH. _r.StP,.
1 u
DEPARTMENT/DIV ON : 14( jl 0/0( TI
n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CO ITIONS
I INOT APPROVED
go/ te't(7,/ 476 / Y d
i/a/R/ge. g (-W71675( (yr6g/ iiec - 11(
eq-/ M-1:1 Ale-c/ //7, "Wr2
4,c7 / Vtle/5 (y
g1/12
l'A
ATE * 4 %3
S 0 DIRECTOR O1RAl2RIZED REPRESENTATIVD
REVISION 5/1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ./
r /
A-E
EAPPROVED JJ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
Lc24.9/xJC /-7/'G:.4 //'r'7.s : > Gv'/L L i 4'6-
22 I Sib..J Sv 1/ c 4 ( 7 (if'!/ ,
A) /2/7. i 7. .v •
DATE : ,Y-,4'- ;
SIGNATURE O, IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
KAPPROVED l JAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE :
SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
scvc n, c /eC7
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVT"TON : L I - _ . rR
OAPPROVED JAIAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
D Clitic -- Se.At-ce-4- 41) elf gl. 6
P--t...A.. 6-.. e3
firat-det. L..)(2;L i-•• eirr-3 .--,
DATE :9 31 5';y?-3
SIGNATURE OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; U- cries
OAPPROVED 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBItCI iii I
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER Kw
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER u°
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER Yes IG kl"'c'`- 4 t.ca niL
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER 116-5
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER isio
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER r,,;;
APPROVED WATER PLAN
APPROVED SEWER PLAN to
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS No
BY FIRE DEPT.
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS µ`'
04--__ DATE: 61 -83
SIGNATURE OF DIROFii OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L
i1`< .// C '/Ai:
PflAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
l'/-
DATE: //i'/l e /
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION A/1Qa1_..
rEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
ig4e_c_...
APPROVED DROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED
E
I
ATE : ,-''8 :5SIGNAREOF9e(AdA"L--
1)
ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
1
REVISION 5/1982
I
i
i
I
I
i
1
i
1
1
f
t
r
1
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): SA-056- 83
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-048-83
Description of Proposal:Application for site approval to
allow a 40' x 120' column
supported roof addition over an
existing asphalt work area/truck
load area. 1
Proponent: Bevaart Construction Company
Location of Proposal: Located at 3700 W. Valley Road.
Lead Agency:City of Renton Building & Zoning
Department.
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 31, 1983, following a presentation by
Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Roger Blaylock, David Clemens, Jerry
Lind, Robert Bergstrom, and Gary Norris.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-048-83 are the following:
1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Mike Currie, DATED August 22,
1983.
2.Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-056-83).
3.Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Utility Engineering
f
Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, Fire
Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, and Building & Zoning
Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An BIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subject site approval application will not adversely impact the environment or
adjacent properties.
SIGNATURES:1
7 //I(
7.!ed 63 ----7 AK 64(e:4--
onald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
L (/ ( di...4.,( a
Ri hard C. Houghton /
Public Works Director
PUBLISHED: September 5, 1983.
APPEAL DATE: September 19, 1983.
1111
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
APPLICATION No(s) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT: BEVAARI' CONSTEUCTION OOMPANY
PROJECT TITLE: VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT. X 120 FT. COLUMN SUPPORTED RC50F ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALT WORK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA: 3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : -
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X
3) Water & Water Courses : X
4) Plant Life:X
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: X
7) Light & Glare: X
8) Land Use; North: INDUSTRIAL
East : INDUSTRIAL
South: INDUSTRIAL
West : INDUSTRIAL
Land Use Conflicts: MINOR
View Obstruction:MINOR
9) Natural Resources : X
10) Risk of Upset : X
11) Population/Employment : X
12) Number of Dwellings : X
13) Trip Ends ( I TE) : NO CHANGE EXPECTFD
Traffic Impacts : INSIGNIFICANT
14 ) Public Services: X
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities: X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation:X
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures :
1/: 1(
i ((e
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
VII2r41r/ '` C-2 Z PUBLISHED: SEPT. 5, 1983
Ri and C. Houghton APPEAL DATE:SEPT. 19, 1983
Public Works Director
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
RENTON, WASHINGTON ON SEPTEMBER 20, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE
FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
M & H ASSOCIATES
Application for final PUD approval to develop 265 units as a two-phase project
called "Earlington Woods Retirement Apartments", File FPUD-057-83; located
west of Hardie Avenue S.W. and south of S.W. 5th Place.
ROBERT A. & NORMA J. CLAYTON
Application for conditional use permit to allow a day care center out of a
single-family residence in a G-1 zoned district, File CU-055-83; located at 4907
Talbot Road South.
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Application for site plan approval to allow a 40' x 120' column supported roof
addition over an existing asphalt work area/truck load area, File SA-056-83;
located at 3700 West Valley Road.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning
Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 20, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR
OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED : SEPTEMBER 9, 1983. Ronald G. Nelson
Building and Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS
WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in the King County, on the 9th day of
September, 1983. },
i 7G 0- SIGNED:
OF R4,
6
J
Z rycl -ricEalL
9A
1 2-6'p SE PS ;
6
City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
puBtle HEARING ,
in
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL
ON SEPTE R_20,198 ______._____ BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M
CONCERNING: FILE SA-056-83
r I REZONE From_. To
r SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
To
x SITE APPROVAL
L I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
VARIANCE FROM _
55kT
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
El SIGNIFICANT NON—SIGNIFICANT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
frn, Wienigsw`tirT PIE C/EVVII IVED WITHOUT
REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI :WENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF
OF RENTON
048 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
AUG Z4 lye
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
ROM/
DEVELOPMPNT r)Fpr
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 F
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
El ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Ei BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
111 POLICE DEPARTMENT
NI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
El OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 :00 P .M. ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : G if/ £ 7L/L/
APPROVED VI APPROVED WITH CO ITIONS illNOT APPROVED
e,o/ etaLl ,i6/71,CA`/ dz/c-7/ d4ici/
dp.e1R/ G 6yp ,QHC 44I
5/701f Xa &-fr((1-Altd 5//) e-/i,
0/ 41-15 ne_ (0)#_ z zezz-4/
01/
j
DATE : PSARE0IRECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REP N BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 FT
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
n ENGINEERING DIVISION
111 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
KFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;
n APPROVED 12 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
A GJ Lo, A%1/20G oea
2,ev s1/f'T 4-4 To Cor/e2
t/C(A.) /10..a!"i io AI •
DATE : F cyV—S ?,
SIGNATURE OF E OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
r aimn•AM c i4non.
REt N BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 FT
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
VIENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C
n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
s(72
07^e" g (.
61,1/4‘2,1'--
0 oo,be,
4
DATE :14,),_,
SIGNATURE OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
RFVISION 5/1982
REP BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 Fi
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
n ENGINEERING DIVISION
1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
ISLUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Fi OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : iioI,L
n APPROVED rizAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
UTILITY APPROVAL SUb kCI
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER Kto
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER u0
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER No - IF- AYeol-AKI D FoI-
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE SEWER Y6'S
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ARE CHARGE • WATER ND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER KD
APPROVED WATER PLAN go
APPROVED SEWER PLAN No
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS No
BY FIRE DEPT.
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 1.t0
1 1 DATE : g3
SIGNATURE OF DIR R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REP IN BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 FT
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
E] ENGINEERING DIVISION
XTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ri OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 4,,1-,=/:_-/c £AS6/Ai6-6se/Afc
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
1
t. WQi61--
1
DATE : 1/4,1*/7('
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESEfJTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
i
RE1 N BUILDING & ZONING DE iTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 - 83
I
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 FT
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
I ] ENGINEERING DIVISION
l ] TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
17,gPOLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
JJ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE : 9'4'133
SIGNA RE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
nr1.l101A1.7 r./l Qn
REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI :TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 043 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40 FT X 120 FT
COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-31-83
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
TIBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
l ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 30, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
X1APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
AbDATE :
SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
111
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): SA-056-83
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-048-83
Description of Proposal:Application for site approval to
allow a 40' x 120' column
supported roof addition over an
existing asphalt work area/truck
load area.
Proponent: Bevaart Construction Company
Location of Proposal: Located at 3700 W. Valley Road.
Lead Agency:City of Renton Building & Zoning
Department.
f
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 31, 1983, following a presentation by
Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Roger Blaylock, David Clemens, Jerry
Lind, Robert Bergstrom, and Gary Norris.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-048-83 are the following:
1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Mike Currie, DATED August 22,
1983.
2.Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-056-83).
3.Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Utility Engineering
Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, Fire
Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, and Building & Zoning
Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subject site approval application will not adversely impact the environment or
adjacent properties.
SIGNATURES:
7
16ezt_ z/
onald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
R hard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
PUBLISHED: September 5, 1983.
APPEAL DATE: September 19, 1983.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 _ 83
APPLICATION No(s ) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT: BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE: VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO Aunty A
40 FT. X 120 FT. COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALT WORK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA: 3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (t) : -
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X
3 ) Water & Water Courses : X
4 ) Plant Life :X
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: X
7) Light & Glare : X
8 ) Land Use; North: INDUSTRIAL
East : INDUSTRIAL
South: INDUSTRIAL
West : INDUSTRIAL
Land Use Conflicts : MINOR
View Obstruction:MINOR
9 ) Natural Resources : X
10) Risk of Upset : X
11) Population/Employment : X
12) Number of Dwellings : X
13 ) Trip Ends ( I T E) : NO CHANGE EXPECTED
Traffic Impacts : INSIGNIFICANT
14 ) Public Services : X
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities : X
17) Human Health: X
18 ) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation: _ X
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures :
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
21
c2- PUBLISHED:SPPT. 5, 1983
Richard C. Houghta APPEAL DATE:SEPT. 19, 1983
Public Works Director
s •
VtLO1(j
ZONI OCI
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENIIVIRONMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 048 _ 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED RUUF AMNION UVEK AN EXI-SIINb ASNHALI WUKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA : 3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
1
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
L
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
I
16 ) Utilities : X
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : X
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : SI Y DOS More Information
Reviewed by : C Title :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
FI ram.
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET J
048ECF 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AUG 2 4 _ 0
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION rein
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED RUUt AUVIIIUN OVER AN LXi511NU /- HALI WUKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA :3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
r
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation . DNSI I DOS More Information
Reviewed by • lit' : v`yl
Date :o ,r5
FORM: ERC-06
at%X))I M JJ
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENV/IROXIPIEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 048 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF AUUIIIUN UVLK AN LA'S' MG ASPHAL1 WOKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA : 3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : t/
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life : i/
5 ) Animal life : L
6 ) Noise : L,'
7 ) Light & glare : z.
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
r
J
10 ) Risk of upset : f
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings : J
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :L//
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : J
18 ) Aesthetics : ti'"
19 ) Recreation : t/'
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Dot- ; . A , _ 8i06 s G,...Q, /2-e s 4,,,_—
0 YYWA2 1-1 kE- LA- —r1l` C.t.Lcs 4 c...e G
t l/(7Le
d
Recommendation : DNSI X DOS More
InformationC : :Reviewed b y : 3.'1 •n .t -i /-.----- 1 e
Date : 8/z6/P__3
L.
FORM: ERC-06
U-T%Lrf .
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENVIIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 048 _ 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED ROUE AUDI IUN OVER AN tAISIINU AJPHALI WUKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA :3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
V _
COMMENTS :
Recommendation,: DOS More Information
4,Reviewed by : 1 itle : 6w/Ai2
Date : g 31-83
FORM: ERC-06
IFFIc
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENIVIIRONMENTAL CIHECIKLIST REVIIEW SHEET
E C F - 048 _ 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT ; BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF AUU111UN OVER AN LX1JIING ASPHALI WUKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA :3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE 06) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life : c--
6 ) Noise : li
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :L/
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : V Cti F E ms .
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :c --
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI // DOS , More Information
Reviewed b title :
Date : 5``: KS74 jj -
FORM: ERC-06
OLI C (
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
ENVIROINIMEMNTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 048 _ 83 CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83) AUG 241983
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY POLICY
DEVCLOPM6I^IT P PT.
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED RUUf AUUIIIUN OVER AN tXISI !NU ASF'HALI WORK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA :3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
BB!
I/
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : D
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life : K
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise : K
7 ) Light & glare : K
8 ) Land Use ; north : 5,7 'if/
east : ii
south : v
west : t
Land use conflicts : klL
View obstruction : t/
9 ) Natural resources : V
10 ) Risk of upset : k
11 ) Population/Employment : X-
K12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends CITE ) : Jjjl`f//7/- /
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : V
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DN'SI ` DOS More
474InformationReviewedby • 1it1e :14,00
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
FOL.'C .
Date circulated : AUGUST 24, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 30, 1983
E\VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 048 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-056-83)
PROPONENT : BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PROJECT TITLE : VAN DAAL SHEAR BUILDING ADDITION
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A
40 FT X 120 FT COLUMN SUPPORTED ROUE AUUILIUN UVEK AN LAISIINU ASFHALI WOKK
AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA.
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED 3700 WEST VALLEY ROAD.
SITE AREA : 3.4 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 56,900 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : Alok
14 ) Public services : AhMRL
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
6ry cT Ro,"
COMMENTS : tC Bulk_ & e,regt f'
1. 1 L,
S E P 6 1983
Recommendation : NSI DOS More Information -
w
Reviewed by : litle :
zr_Date : av
1 FORM: ERC-06
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT TEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
1 he Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a FINAL declaration of
NON-significance for the following projects:
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (ECF-048-83),
Application for site plan approval to allow a 40' x 120' column supported roof
addition over an existing asphalt work area/truck load area, File SA-056-83;
located at 3700 West Valley Road.
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY (ECF-049-83)
Application for shoreline management exemption to stabilize eroded areas of
an embankment underlying concrete apron with riprap, File SME-003-83;
located north of Boeing's buildings 4-01, 4-81, and 4-82 on Lake Washington.
Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning
Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC
action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by September 19, 1983.
Published: September 5, 1983.
9 0:1,'' ;,:: •',.' :;' ,' ,' , : , :,,•;:q'f4,:.p• ".;,,',
r•-.,!,:,,V'W,;',;':,', •: ..•: :•••,;::::'',i.ki,',4,g,,',1 1c ,:fIlIctl:-0,; :,•,' - ',2';,-, ..'',,,'4,4'cti.,,,,,n:
V;e4'':,',1 .: 1; .. • •:'I •.[:-.141'',;:s1.1,,VW
ENVIRONMENTAL i -,.ii!,;r. ,
c
APPUCATION NO.ECF-048-83, SA-056-83 1:1
PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A 40' X 1 0'
CD! UlvitSUPPORTED ROOF ADDITION OWR AN EXISTING ASPHAI T VCRK AREA/TRUCK I 1411 ARFA.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
LOCATED AT 3700 VEST VALLEY ROAD
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ) "HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
E3DOES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
DWILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED. .,,,, . ,,?,':3;;,,,.„,:sto ,,,,div,,40#4444,, ,x, ,' ',,,,:4, "!,,i44100,tr,-:,r,•,,.:,. . ,, ,,,,. ,
R.,, ,,,,c:,,--,::.:,1.•• i:,-..4-'0, .nr,e::,o ' . J. '-stu..;,.1; .4-,i. ;,......
1,,:.,
1 •','4:,:,:::•-',‘:Ie,:•,,••.,,1:t,.,,,,444,•:.."14,,i7-',,,,!•,',`,,''' ' ' '1`, •1* klfriki4',4, ,:'''''A':!' " •'' '
4
4`r ' 1. , ',.•••, : , •,: ,..„, ••„•:::, :'','''°'9•1i,l'''''''''''''itH.';10,t'' '''grtiO('•01 ''''M' A q q'l q i,'' ',1"I'•Jio4,14:4;i4iL,AIL, "",," :!1• •• '•..• : '''. ..'•:.;;.,,,:l:'
i.:' ..i,!..i,::„..•
s. . .;,Af0:•,. .,,,•.0.0",i,,,,Yq".:4':',.:;4":','," fiy 7','''',$,v::.nr.••,,!'•/7,s,,i,,,4441:4,444,010040C•4R"'',-''I' ''•' • .•' • r.:',
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY : ::
L.:'
L,k.,i
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., SEPTEITER 19. 1983
t t
41.P0.0... 0 \'t , ,,,'14,fiVil•&1.. .0;"•;',i6lf,f,444),•d,kaitik. tA:',W1i0110/,!,'',,i*ifrAii;,• ••' ,.;,.''•• i: ,N,i,, ,44,I
A
A.•,-;i!,• :,-., i:-.3
q,','J,' o4,,,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
r',',•:
q,',,'I, ;,•,;VCONTACTTHECITYOFRENTDN
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
235-2550 L.,,,,,;,, ..,•;.„,:,? : .. :
ft.,;,•,,
4,40:iiiert ,..:4*,,P,-. ,',,', .,•
I
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
ENVIRUNMEN I AL REVIEW COMMIT 1 EL
AGENDA
AUGUST 31, 1983
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM:
COMMENCING AT i0:00 A.M.
PENDING BUSINESS:
ECF-018-83 AUSTIN COMPANY
SP-029-83
ECF-333-83 EVERGREEN WEST PROPERTIES
CU-037-83
V-038-83
ECF-041-83 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PROPERTIES, INC.
SP-048-83
OLD BUSINESS:
ECF-034-83 VIP'S RESTAURANTS, INC.
SA-042-83 Application for site approval to allow a 9,206 square foot sit-down
restaurant ("La Casa Real"); located on the northwest corner of Rainier
Avenue S. and S. W. Grady Way.
ECF-042-83 M-V PROPERTIES
R-051--83 Application to rezone approximately 6 acres of property from G-1 to R-3
for the construction of a 150 unit multi-family complex; located
approximately 400 feet east of Talbot Road S. and south of S. E. Carr Road.
NEW BUSINESS:
ECF-047-83 ROBERT A. & NORMA 3. CLAYTON
CU-055-83 Application for conditional use permit to allow a day care center out of a
single-family residence in a G-1 zoned district; located at 4907 Talbot
Road S.
F CF-048-83 BEVAART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
SA-056-83 Application for site plan approval to allow a 40' x 120' column supported
roof addition over an existing asphalt work area/truck load area; located at
3700 West Valley Road.
ECF-027-83 M & H ASSOCIATES
FPUD-057-83 Application for final PUD approval to develop 265 units as a two phase
project called "Earlington Woods Retirement Apartments"; located west of
Hardie Avenue S.W. and south of S.W. 5th Place (will need memorandum of
concurrence).
INFORMATION:
ECF-095-81 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES
R-090-81 Application to rezone 12.5 acres of property from T to R-3 for a medium
density housing development of 11 to 18 units per acre; property located
east of Lake Washington Blvd. between the Renton Golf Range and Griffin
Home and east of Gene Coulon Beach Park. (This application is now
planned to be scheduled for public hearing.)
METRO
For Renton's information is a summary and full copy of Metro's recently
completed sludge management plan.
sY 0 TY OF RENT( FILE NO(S) : >A-C.Sc;-K3 ;
C)04.BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ci'O`fg K3
el MASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME FEES
BEVAART CONSTRUCTION CO.
Q REZONE*(FROM TO
ADDRESS
RT. 2 BOX 1052
SPECIAL PERMIT*
CITY ZIP
TEMPORARY PERMIT*
BUCKLEY WA . 98321
1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE
1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 30 0
n GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
8 2 9—0 5 8 0 No. of Cubic Yards:
VARIANCE
CONTACT PERSON From Section:
Justification Required
NAME
MIKE CURRIE
ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS:
15 SO. GRADY WAY 0 SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT
RENTON ,WA . 98055 E] PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT
2 3 5-12 3 0 0 WAIVER
Justification Required)
O`A'(
i N E R NO. OF LOTS:
NAME l PLAT NAME:
VAN DAAL_ INC. i
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOrMENT:
3700 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY Q PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP ED FINAL
RENTON ,WA . 98055
P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
P Residential ED Industrial
ED Commercial Q Mixed
LOCATION
M06ILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS
3700 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY
TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING
O PRELIMINARY
ED FINAL
MFG. FACILITY MEG. PARK
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
SAME NUMBER OF SPACES:
0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIE:V !:JMMITTEE cbzt
SQ. FT. I ACRES
TOY AL `FE 3C{
L 4 8.0 0 1 34 PtiP,6
t• 1' STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE STAMP ) ?c! .
APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: cR q!JQ I
i` J,U C22 1983 }
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
El Accepted
Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
w —
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
L Q Accepted
QIncomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
ROUTED TO:
Sii Building Et Design Eng.
TA
Fire ED Parks
1.1 Police tg Policy Dev. C4 Traffic Eng. En Utilities
REVISION 5/1 082
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
NORTH 271 .25 ' OF THE SOUTH 601 .10 ' OF THAT PORTION OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 7, SECTION 25 ;TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH ,RANGE 4 EAST ,
W. M. , IN KING COUNTY ,WASHINGTON , LYING WEST OF THE PUGET SOUND
P&L COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY AND EAST OF WEST VALLEY ROAD,ACCORDING TO
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS ; PAGE 76, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY ,WASHINGTON.
AFFIDAVIT
tx
Y P&IQ. -714)E. 11E being duly sworn, declare that I am
authorized representative to act for the property owner. [owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
n I.?` DAY OF V 6("v 1
19`33 .
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT
14,140-x-2
Name of Notary Public Signature of Owner)
A
l0FivT
A(' OAAl
7,5 / . 03 (—)E >--r V A(,(S Y
Ac;d:a s) Address)
G Ar-ro,.; tAi tq
c S0c7
City) State) (Zip)
2o ) 23 fz62
Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
1 '
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Auu
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No.s — OS Lo — 83
Environmental Checklist No. (.C)C- U11?-61-...-
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
ElDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent VAN DAAL , INC.
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
3700 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY
RENTON ,WA. 98055
762-0800
3. Date Checklist submitted
4:7" 2Z-$ 3
4. Agency requiring Checklist BUILDING & ZONING DEPT.
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
VAN DAAL SHEAR BLDG. ADDITION
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
ADD 40 ' x 120 ' COLUMN SUPPORTED ROOF OVER AN EXISTING
ASPHALTED WORK AREA/TRUCK LOAD AREA; WITH 5-TON CAPACITY
OVERHEAD BRIDGE CRANE.
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
ROOF TO BE PLACED OVER AN EXISTING ASPHALTED WORK AREA
THERE WILL BE NO IMPACT TO THE ENVIORNMENT.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
4 ) FOUR WEEKS AFTER PERMIT IS GRANTED
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
BUILDING PERMIT
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain :
NO
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
NONE
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
Pam— MAYBE NO--
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? X
Y rs- MAYBE A
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YT MAYBE N(U-
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
YET- MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES MAYBE FM--
Explanation:
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
YES AAYBE WO--
b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
Yr MAYBE WV
c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature ,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? X
YET— MAYBE NB
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in :
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
Yr- MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
YES MAYBE N5—
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBENB
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
X
body?
YES M ABE NU—
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?X
YES MAYBE N1S
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
X
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct_additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate ,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
Xorothersubstancesintothegroundwaters?
YET— MAYBE NB
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
X
for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE MO-
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass, crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YEc MAYBE WU—
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or
endangered species of flora? X
YES MAYBE WO—
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X
species?
YES MAYBE AU'
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
X
YET MAY BB N
Explanation:
111
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
X
YES MAYBE N
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? X
Y MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
X
FEB MAYBE NU
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?
X
YES MAYBE WO--
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
X
YES MAYBE WU—
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
X
present or planned land use of an area?
YES RATITE WO--
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES MAYBE WO--
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including ,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
YES MAYBE
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? X
SYE MAYBE AU--
Explanation:
S S
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
VEf- M B NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES Mir NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
VET M YBE HT
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
V!f- war g
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?. X
VT MAYBE WU—
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
YE— MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? X
YES MAYBE 0—
b) Police protection?
X
YTE- M A8 W
c) Schools?X
YES MATTE N-
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services? X
YES MM H-6—
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YET MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YET— RAYTE
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
X
Yam— RATITE WO—
b) Communications systems?
Yrf- M A B N
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
0
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBE N6—
e) Storm water drainage?
Trr MMA BE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal ? X
YES M YBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Yam' MAYBE
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
YES MAYBE WU—
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the-proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X
YET— MAYB
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE
Explanation:
III . SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
ned)
MIKE 6)RR,IE
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
LND1NG
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
01
7
056
pi Il
i
1
li