The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA81-005r N' , 1 I BEGINNING 1 OF FILE TITLE Eig I C RO F ILM EDFlILE e , I 1 I .JP i 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 i\\I, 1 11II 1 VTTI, INC. SA-005--81 V-006-.81 GNUTCO SIGN MUTCO TIP) 9 4% NO. TYPE 9/ZE COCOL REF No, TYPE SIZE COLOR REF 8^' 6' h[ 4''4a 5''Or Sd'%90•• WH/TG R/-/ 8 E^%/S" GREEN[N rt mrtImrtEl`.rtrt I STOP an/REO El" WHITE L' a 7,, LivinI\ O r SO.X30" WN/ RTeQ R5-/ 9 OIPK! C N or/ F,_ , ik 1=- i- Ilaa.m.1rrtrtrt EXISTING GROUN GKt""7 A a'B/-AC/c 1== Tert/rIA ' 4 ON WHITE O RId C le WHH?B I" I 6 m CCj CM M a w•= M/U MIA/ I I- 2"Y9• HRE wV MT-/ uvaaal aWIROYG. BLACK sworn mot.—.tlalA,,'_, i px - 111-III= Iv.r.nanl A wwNnE GREEN NJ as r i: =. m III_IIu 3:/, yA y,t M g m jR Ih IIII=IIII= G%M/NCr M) O 'TRUCKSS 24•A yO• ev c.•K R4-5 Q 3o.X so' aLACK R3-5 l Mexecterre 8 4'M/NU6 GV WHTSE I 13,4• _-:AIXri%.iii QUARRY ROCK SPA//c PANT ON W/wTE ONLY I• LANE 1 mE=sa,. ...1.71 TYPICAL ROCK L/AIED DITCH BACK/9 mOETA/L /Z eaRrtKa r LLON i// g._'g. WHRE oNo I %, z. GLUE II3 /a 1 T P) 7r 111 NOTES: It AN L TER ALTER THE S/GN NUMBER O/V THE'PLANS All INDICATES O/RECDoN. /G QS L /NO/CATE9"TRL/CKG//SE 1 •II EFT LANE-'S/GN. S 11 L G 1VOTE= Z. (A) SILE A9 RE4U/RGO IL'K UJGC1r 3ER/ES r" lNall TRAP/S TO BE MADE G'Lt=TTET/N4 OF 2G6A GAL AN/LED 6) SIZE NB/REpu/RCO Ant UBCI T SER/E5 "C•' I METAL,ALL UO/UTS N Q 4"LETTER/No MIME _ ARE TO BE bE4ME0 Q C) 5/LE A9 REONAREO AOR LETTER SIZES THE SAME 1:1 .P. AA/D SOLDERED. ALL AS SIGN NUMBER B J I ,_ •____ ___ RIVE TB ARE TE bE DI RI / U I D/MEU- U" Y a 11 V. SIGN D/5 THE 1I'_ MN lljP' _ r= UOM/UAL DIAMETER p IJ I I, -"` vtli of OUTLET PIPE. n BEE PLAN- O 2" G^ n 4 STATE MOTOR 3/8"%4OB PREMIUM wry f"' a" ISTYPEGOATRAP 1 d GRADE GLUE CAM/DATED TYPICAL OIL TRAP FOR GREATER THAN 3 VEHICLE EMISSION '4 = t D 8"DIAMETER OUTLET DETAIL_ /s INSPECTION STATION PAVEMENT MARKINGS NT5 DETA/L / e NTS 11 1 n I 9/OEWALKJ J7II 4 SLWOOE9 BO1// BIDES../HEN ELEVATION RAMP,9 A AY rn FURS A 8/a'EI r144--'Rel..SO OPLACEDON TACK Q .• COAT,SEE J'CCs S' J L 9 l PAINT 1 YpJ STR/PE I I 1 c\ 4ExTcN0KAAV=...//07// SECTION v n" G'NEN RAMP/B NEXT Al 1 A TO A 5/Oe Co946. 4a%/ 1ziLFACILITYSIGNANDLEGENDN NOTE. y,.1• FQ O/MEN6/ON9 ANO Y STRoNL OP HAND/CAP DETAIL /5 6 STALL sGE'G1=Tq/L HAND/CAP FICP Ri AAP j N.TS, I l y O F EET DES GOG STATE OF WASHINGTON I/M PROGRAM ET-AILOr G-C-2 CH2M VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) DATE ii HILL CHK.GRF MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS NOD' s14157.81 AM.MRM NO. DATE REVISION BY AID. PREUMINARY VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V-006-81 S'f1; E Ai 7.'\•,,, 3 N ram ` C`\, , CONNECT/ON 7D'EX/ST/M.'SEWER 5Q/ / LINE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE I cJ GWITHLOCALMUNICIPALREGULATIONS. MATCH EX/STING CROWN ELEVATIONS I L——off- — 6% SW TENTH STREET ell --, gp:55-- 55-- y JIO/A FCC!. H ai 9G ss— ---8's— 5.0.005,7 I f97LPING '/; EASE EXST INVT EL O4 63 A CATCH BASIN 1INLET SCHEDULE EASEMENT z c.2,io(rr NUMBER LID EL /NV/N /NV OJT L/OTYPE TYPE n J ' „ i4r0/•E I I N-/ 994 - 9890 GRATE SV-C ——— • - — rod5--,-- ki9•S—' IV____ 99 7 97.83 97.79 GRATE Z-C f' Wi _ 07 m 2 99.4 - 99.00 GRATE Z-C 00 1 ' I. 3 99 3 - 97.00 GRATE Z-C Y / I INI' SS I I,_4 97.7 - 95.70 GRATE Z-C 1 2•O/A PCCP CATCH BASIN TO 367. STORM I 11 s-o aos FT/kT DRA/NCONNECT/ON SCHEDULE / /1 I' NVT EL j / 98 LP ccSTIFLICTLIR GAMY / NV/N /NV DUT 1l Icd+N CBRI ` 97.24 95 24 I J II I CB 2 9788 95 92 I I HHAA DETAIL I CG-3 94 90 94.94 I /! I N I vD/A FCCP 1 EL'LDS` O POS FT/FT CB-4 9555 94 52 1 24 LP I C.2•I fit INLET/Nl? II)) EL 95.G ENO RIP RAP DITCH RECHANNEL d7CH,L/NE NS7bLL CYL SEHfROTOR'S/N ALL C® ..1p1 • 1 R/ 9•MINUS 4UARRY/ CATCH EWS/N5.SEE LIETA/L " I - II ROCK. SEE DETAIL I , ii.._.....s.... .....-. -' 94 I II 1 •lSIIO 94 !_ O if j1011UM 3 /MAX airir OVER EGO I25KV Po ER c 2 , .`—i SW_ nu s 4 Y_ , BO 7-0,9 LINE NEUTRAL-EL. viIIAITIOr. per gypIQ i l li T 2 I M/N S•LWE/ / IX/TLET 1 I , l, J I T' / 00 ~20•GAS/ I C iI2'O/A KCP 1 2-94•0/A CULVERT 2•dA FCC, REMOV E[sr/ P- /S1 EL SEE 3 9/T2 JO S•O 005 FT/PT -PIPE SCHEDULE 5•O 02 FT/ET CULVE T _ CB 7O 34•570RM 0 /0 20 10 IO I 31.5 LP 240 3 EACH,S• 005 5 L, I / CRA/CC I,VECT/CNNSHEET Al SEE DeTA/L/ \ TYP/CAL I420' r 1 p b I I i SIN GRADY WAY llI EOCE CIF PAVEMENT 1, OIL P/PEL/NE CJ l -r EASEMENT m H2s ---0---ro / T PM eLu CH2M LAC. STATE OF ETESTTGTON I'MTECHNOLOGY,PROGRAM SI E 2 10THST.&THSOUTHCO NSER 2•C-3 HILL VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) o..e 05-0 M MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS OF o' I. UTILITY PLAN moo. S14157.131 I/O o.Te evrsio. r Am. PNEL$I ARY 0 -..., VTTI, INC. y SA-005-8i V-006-81 6 r_5 I A 1, I 9EE cURE)MOUNTED SUPPLY FAN HOOD My`y`y 0 yl-. i I1 9KYLITE 6EYDIJD-TYr DEYOUD-TYP l SEEK-AM A4EM 1' /N- I AT I/ DeWALK-7YP DE CENTER J. e E I N i 2x6 mK.•DC. PREFAORICATED T _ PREFADRICATED r WWOTRU55 TEYONO a-) H / I , 2444 G,B'O^(MAXiCONT W/IOd 2xG[14 hYP) T / EATRUSS 2.ad EENCC66(•f%P) o x l2 DOOR1HP)I G 6) .''''''''... .,---''''''''''' f )iti 2=e^-TYP9 o I v I t a A I1 rr 1 - it REFERENCE FLOOR LlNE L-9EE SITE I1'' PLAN FOR1ELEVATION TL 13UILD/NG SECTION( bUILDING SECTION we'.!Le A.AI 3/5E.P-0. A-Al NOTE: FoR TO WALL CONNECTKJ 5 i FACIA F9,RAMIUG OETAILs.GE A sal A 4 1XJUDLE TRUSS.NAIL 2x6 CANTILe EReT RXETHER W4 CHO 16" secT 6 EA PLYHaxo JOINT TOP 4 earrl'l1 CHORD(TYP) A-4 2x4 BLOCKING 2x6®1e' ..C.W/00WMAN 1 FA PLYWC2D.A91UT bJ55 WUIGER EA END h\ i E.Ct iii .' 7iIbT 1e w— i, 11I'I_ I .IRMI @a ICI II IAl;I IllIIIIII 2x4m B'd HYMN El_I AT ENO 2-I(od M - 1I 2. ENDS lik 2x4 ad'w/3 NI 6d EA GA D 2x4 PEA 2x6 CA eAlzgoVER O z.,— I,. i.. ..1Lill7 I SEE ELEV E al DWG I A•7 R DIAIEJJSIOI.15 13UILVING SECTION re-1 SECTION f SECTIONIvH Olin DES.STATE OF WASHINGTON UM PROGRAM BUILDINGS A,B.C ARCHITECTURAL oI A•3CH2MONVEHICLETESTTECHNOLOGY,INC.) iif TILL cxx. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS DATE M AIfO. NO. DATE REVISION BV App. fib'SII177.A1 VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 - - V-0 0-6--81-- - - Cg FLAB HY, P 47Y1f GCYL.nR NL7TE f qX-FTT/N45, B'BaY1T ,e.T SPREAD ROOTS T G1 FdJNC'Y1T.1=T'/CLx_L.NZ OVER COM- FKCTED A 4 HA- - o• GFJ'/ PJC,W3 FLANT/NG 5G/L ' 1) 9 IVE+`prNE'N WTO 7NC MIXTURE. Hrpn RUBBER HOSE RUOBE/r HOSE ANO 6[t7J A N Pr -I f-Pi`' 1 T/ O 6rYT V .I.EYE BOLT'AND 4 L'OGCMPATE{7 BRA.VCL I, II GUY WIRE IN YI 7 C WRAPPING MATER/AL N I= ' Mr . . ,•711Z. .i 0 TREE STAKES R PfOIL J3{; cf I. F/N/5H MULCH MIJLIJ-/ 1 YE GRADE i.T• _ r- MIN r E GA.GUY J. 4K ol3TA1.EL i .. ---o. Z aY W/RE iL i G M!N t- Z'M/N Eor/O per j l\ _ IFJ I IJIL'R I i_L-^-G NW 9'•0'r IZ'6CLF-CEI-TICR/NB JJf 111 I L j 1A g=R -•_`Oil T O "I c AI PLANTING SOIL i.... A{ 1 Al MIXTURE t 1 ti•11 trcWirj UGHTLV COMPACTED p 10 4 B7GCL C>•NTCRIN4 we.099.3 I II 111 I -I TL.-III II M/XTUREPLANTA-VG SO'L i IIIT _ .S..-.III N OUBGRAD- I ANCHOR----"" B'O'.EE'pLnTE= FCYJN04T70'-/'-eCIC I M/N IY ROOT BALL I 5O/L MIXTURG 0 Y 'lyF 4'-O'M/N. V 7C,er, E 6PT COMPACTED I 7D N'KC 5l/BGRAOE STREET TREE PLANT/NG L TLY Oi R aJTP/BQNL LIGNTN/N6 PR7TCG7L%K 9F7KG MIXTURE 70 PLA/NQ M1- ,TO PIf+.TL EVERGREEN TgEE norl PLANT/NG 5-O v MULCH E9•/ Z+G' lee ryY-P CURD y P.S9°CIN&A9 Z' d'-o' n./o QC6wALK tavi0.R80E_C42 z' GROUND I,V41110t. l. 1 MULLN EN!/RE 2ED daPil COVER _ \. y.: kr°- 2z1.. .. I .I E[7 AF7FR PlJ.NT/Nb MULCH 1 %A\//i\\Y//4./,/\\%A\\//\Yid,.I\//C//// 2'M/N j\/ ED5E O EED n'M/N srAKE PI-ANT AT/N7FJTlOV 7AP:/0'L- t tl PLANTING,50E- 1 M/N.277M CALL- • LCriIiXLTFlJ 4'R'/'6TCCL-EDGE SUPYa4+E g'.erL455=D4gT CONIC IV1111113PAOBA/C- X 7 4'METAL STAKE SHRUB PLANTING 7RO LSO ADC 01 AWALK TO THE T/L FINISH DC L1QPE1V C/ .A,K Bccrc=LJNe AB6RECi.A-7J: SPACING OF PLANTS F ,,, E,' i DIVIDER FL,AB ILY 6AEJG,,C.,r AM FLAG Ftx- -PLAN ji, \ LZTAIL ZG DETAIL z NTE YT9 v SPIFFY i '' y G STATE OF WASHINGTON IIM PROGRAM D` DES.LMA BY 1.1.401 ' J r,++• ryDETAILS DATE CHzM EHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) pq,90 yvl MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONSo°'S14157.B1 HILL CNK. AppO. NO. DATE NEVISIONSC.' PRELIMINARY c.s A4ANN1N VT TI, INC: --- - SA-005-81 V-006-81 INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE S SPACE FLOOR BASE&WAINSCOT NORTH WALL EAST WALL SOUTH WALL WEST WALL CEILING. MISCELLANEOUS • REMARKS MINO. NAME SUB FL FNSH COLOR MGT MATL FNSH COLOR WALLS MAIL FNSH COLOR MAIL FNSH COLOR MAIL FNSH COLOR MATL FNSM COLOR HOT MAIL FNSH COLOR REM MATL FNSM COLOR OFFICE COA.0 vAT 4' RES/L 1-71, ALL awes //4 - 6W5 //4 awes //4 aWS _1/4 644' AC.T FC7Y Z CUSTOMER SERVICE CONC VAT 4' RES/L FE/V awe. 1/4 awes //4. GA/8 //4 awe /l4 6 AC.T FC7Y COUMER Waco*Po *SEE DETAILS SW.A- 3 72.A//JIA.G-ROOM OOHC VAT 4° RESIL FC1Y ALL 4/VS 1/4 60V3 //4 aW8 1/4 aW6 114 BVo°AC.T FC7Y 4 CORR/00R GONG VAT 4' RES/L FC7Y ALL 6145 I/O 6W6 //4 51V6 Hs 611,8 1/4 8=61' AC T FC7Y 5 wON/EAS LAv CONC SM/S 6' SMLB — ALL SK/5 115 aAla //5 a/46 115 awes //S a'- 'AC.T FC7Y VAN/7Y0OUN7FJC /OCOA' 1G/ *SEE DETAILSSHA- 6 LUNCH ROOM 6O116 VAT 4' RES/L FL•Il' 1 aJ./6 //4 aWEI /14 6K1B //4 6w6 /14 8LD' AC.T /67Y CASE AVOE/C /V'70Q4 Pp *SEE DETAILS SF/A- 7 MENS LAN/ C0/.0 SM/S 6' SMLS — ALL 6/ve //5 6H/6 //S Bw6 //6 Gw5 1/5 8=O' AC.7- /r7Y VAN/7Y6JUH7ER /4ZJD4 Pp *SEE DE/A/LS SW A- 6 .14/4/70R CONC SML4 /e' SMLS — ALL W/R8W6 ///o W/45JV8//6 /4/481B l/O w/R615 1/4 N-0' AC T FC7V SHELVES A0O0,4/02 *SEE DETAILS sil A-4.4 9 ISME/IS/4 XERI(YJ/LET OVJC SMLS !o' SN/LS — ALL W/R4W5 /16 Ai/gags//O A//R6w8 N!o Jry/R6W8 //6 6'-cF AC.T FC7Y. LKRJITMASH,* A PC7Y *SEE. Si-1 A- A•5,C /0 ME/IS/LCXERS/1S/E7- CO/C SAWS 47' SMLS — ALL F'l/RC/8 /18 K1/R4W6 //G W/R4/5 /16 w/R8/e //6 8=d AC.T FCY L 4SrF' /sS4FC7YR it-FC7Y *SEE SN A- WOMENS TOILET CONC SMIS la"' SMLS — ALL /1l/TOSS /I/o W/45.W8//!o W/,C4W5//v A//Rave //a B1o' AC.T FC7Y 741/LET PINS P LAM FC7Y MENS 70/LET 67NC SMLS 8' SMLS — ALL 1.<1/R6148 ///o H(Q5W5//!o W/R6w6//a i'(RG44/16 a'-d AC.T /Z7Y 70/LE-P7NS P LAM FCN STORAGE 67hC NJN/R CLR 4' RESIL RC7Y ALL MOO /02 MOO /02 MOO /02 MOO /02 • ale GWB //4 4 EOU/PMEJJT 07NC MAW CLR 4' RES/L FC7Y ALL MOO /02 MOO /02 MOO /02 MOO /02 241 awes //4 5 VEHICLE 7ESTAREA CO1.C. 1/Ja1R CLR G/' CO1C ALL MOO /02 MOO /02 MOO /OZ t'Pl3.M /O/ LAME WOOD /02 0 DOOR AND HARDWARE SCHEDULE DOOR TYPES COLOR LIST 0 OPENING FRAME HARDWARE A. STAIN:OLYMPIC N= 721,SEMI-TRANSPARENT al NO. SIZE DOOR DETAILS NOVREV REMARKS 8. TO MATCH C/5 MED BRONZE AE43 m C. PAINT WIDTH HEIGHTTNKNS CONSTR TYPE FINISH COLOR MATL TYPE FINISH COLOR HEAD JAMB SILL DROOP DROOP D. PAINT E. 5L0' 747' /'(yam NM A /07 NM A /07 1 / /2 G AA -2 BL0lF. PLASTIC LAMINATE: 2 sLo' 7Lo' /%4° AIM 6 107 NM A /07 2 3 4 I AA-I G. PLASTIC LAMINATE 1 44 3 7' Vd NMO' / 6 /07 N AAMA /07 2 3 4 / -I I H. STAIN VARNISH 46 6'-0' 740' /%e' NM A. /07 • NM A /07 5 5 G 2 AA-I ?L/'/IR UL RA7ING LASEL J. TOILET PARTITIONS 54 3 7/0' isle NM C /07 NM A 1D7 25 — NAME RATE:WOMEN K. SHOWER STALL- WE /iaE-RE ROLL-UP L. LOCKER SSB37C0' /°yes° NM C /07 NM 4 /07 2 5 — GCJ! 7A 3-0' 7L0' /%B' WM C /07 NM A /07 1 I /2 3 — NAA4EM,47H: MEN 76 9,0' 7,0' /%8' NM C /07 NM 4 /07 2 5 .— A C D_ es' SL0' 7 / 4/B NM C _-/07 NM A /07 2 a, AA-I Zia' 7Ld /"/a' NM C /07 HM A /07 2 4 AA-I AI ale7L0' /?l4' NM C /07 HM A /07 2 5 4 5 AA-I NAMEPLATE:WOMEN 216' 710' /yes' NM C /07 NM A /07 1 /2 4 AA-I FRAME TYPES NOTES 25 3L0' 7,0' /le HM C /07 NM A /07 Z 3 4 5 AA--/ 1...0.`4EPLA7E : MEN 3 4L0' 7'0' /5/4' NM C /07 LIM A /07 7 _7 6 2 AA-I e' r /. NUMBERS /N FINS 1 SPEC/ COLD 4 RE.7O FAINT SYSTEMS/N SPEC/Q 9Ld 7LO' /%B' NM C /07 NM 4 /07 7 7 G. 2 M -I A t 165 3''-d 72.0' /34'_NM C /07 HM 4 /07 G El 4 / M -/ SEC.T/0N 09900. 2' J Z. PAINT/MERIOR N//NOOW LINERS N//77J 156 2-0° /JL0 — MET 0 /07 w0 /02 9 A7 1/ 7 — WALLS OF SU FAGE 5C 2L0' J4Cd — MET O 107 WO 102 9 /O // 7 — ro h !N4'ROw'`iRE6'e0uF5 A4E/N 6PECJF/CA770N v\ SEGT/ON CL97G77. 5p oLN J/o' — MET 0 /07 NO /02 9 /0 // 7 — 7 DOOR FRAME DETAILS ARE ON SN A-5 15E 2id /440' — MET 0 /07 WO /02 9 /0 // 7 1, 15F 2 !OLD' — MET 0 /07 wo /02 9 2 // 7 —J/ v 1 E6 2v ra d — /4EF D o7 wD roz 9 O 7 — 6 + 5 44 taxi /Zo' /40' — MET 0 /07 w0 /O2 9 /0 I/ 7 — 5T 2'0' 14'0' — MET -0 /07 - NO /02 9 /0 // 7 — J LS/ /0' A4, — MET 0 /07 -NO /02 9 /0 // 7 — 1\1 C EK 20' /4/' — MET O /07 WO /02 9 to // 7 — b 1 DES SHEET• STATE OF WA J N IIM PROGR i; UILDINGS A,B,C ARCHITECTURAL OF A B CHzM DR.Y{€RP R VEHICLE T E al/ {iC?a Y HILL MOTOR VEHICLE EMI SIDN E o o FINISH&DOOR SCHEDULES DATE CHK. ARD. NO. DATE REVISION I BY APPD. M S1A157.A1 • VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V-006--81 LUM/NAIRE SCHEDULE HOT L SEE AREA LIGHTING PLAN FOR LOCATION. MF4 LAMPS MWNT/NG LUMIAIAIRE FIXTURE MS SYMBOL TYPE CATALOG OESCRIPT/ON WITH GENERALN AREA REFRACTOR NUMBER FOR AREA LIGHTING, BENJAMIN 3-F-.ET12/ PENDANT FLUOR FV-/l35- VAPoeWITH TIGHTCEMIT, ONE PIEECE AS ETCCOVER MW HO C17 I AND NCON PAP ROVEDIECE PP BALLASTS.COVER L. Al NOLOPHANE 2-F4OTIZCW RECESSED FLUOR SG4R1- 2-LAMP RAPID START FLUOR FIXTURE REFRACTIVE p I I FNB MS ?FOOT X-.FOOT,RECESSED GRID FOR ID) INSTALLATION IN T-BAR CEILINGS,INJECTION MOLDED ACRYLIC LENS,RADIO SUPPRESSOR,/20 JOLT BALLAST O HPS -ZOO-A-50 12 WEATHERPROOFX WITH 120V BALLASTED HOLOPHANE 1-16DW HPS POLE 06'-O° ON 3 SASE COVER SASS F/ COVER DOFFr—t IA?LOPHANE // W I''CHAMFER I HID -.19-I20-PR WALL TMOUNTEDINUNIT PRO ENCLOSED WALL dl A,i F/MFE OA:AOE PIOTIYE/I 1 BALLAST/N WEATHERPROOF DIE-EAST EWe//RACXETT) L_ LUM/NAIL'S 40-1 AL UM/NUM MOUSING WAIN ISOV BALLAST F/RTNESS Ail RI gal.' Vigil! I(11=illl= MOONTE-D qV NCANO WB-19 WAL BALLET UNIT,D/E-CAST ALCM/NVM PREELOL/TE NCO WALL Q CONCRETE FOUNDATION LUM/NN ti, CONSTRUCTION. BLOWN,PoL/SHED f0Ow AAICHOR SOL75 AG REOD 0+ CONSTRUCTION.GLASS aE gT EKE•MA•luFALTUREK 1 OUDU/T G INCAND WA-Co DIECAST ALUMINUM FITTINGS WITH PRESCOLITE (NCAND WALL S ED• AOLI//EDGUART HERMOPAL GLASS POLE LIGHT I/ 'STALL AT/Oki PHOTOCELL SCHEMATIC. DETAIL DIAGRAM MTS S'I6E LG ALWVNTIZEDHERH EAD 4,0"MIN/MUM iLENGTHofCONDUCTOR I I BUILDING ROOF I AClA IIIIIIIIIICOVERSHALLBEGALVANIZEDIIIIIIIIEEIRONWITHANH.2O VEHICLE I 5/IICX 4. LOADING AND CABLED WITH I I' MT TO TRUSSES MEOSSED/ENGRAVED LETTERS. PRECAST CONCRETE IIu-bOX WOOD SCREWS ELECTRIC HANOHOLE//5'OX/B'WXZI'L. 3'R161D GALVANIZED COL/OBITCONDUCTORS THE STEEL CONDUIT LENGTH-SHALLOFLL SE DETERMITNED LONG WAY THROUGH HANONOL FINISHED FLE,Y COVWTT STEM 9N4 LL(3E DETERMINED SURFACE mpuNT METER BASE IA FIELD. 5 O"ABOVE FINISHED GRAD 1' CURREN TRANSFORMER f AND T • /NAL y ENCLOSE RE-NEMA 3A LUMINA/RE FIXTURE IN FINISHED GRA• MINIMUM BURIAL Ape :,•. ::c.ec 2' p OF!¢. 1c'd FMI/SHEO FLOOR RIGID CONDUIT o ORAINAE ED OF 1'M1NL/GS GRAVEL SERVICE.L p t AICG DROP aL /ATIO/VJLTIYE-.G D/1TAIL N.T.5. PE,UD,4A/T FIXTURE INSTALLATION TYPICAL HAIVDHOL QETA'L— THIN INOTLLejloN APPLIES ONLY TO THE SOUTH SETA/L c)---f .J) f S\\ t. Jf 4 JJ a- 1 ,- tC 91EEi G',L `1i\Vt E.5BUILDINGSA,B,C ELECTRICAL 0, qQ i STATE OF WASHINGTON AIM PROGRAM DATE DES. Y"'II (VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) CH2M uR. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS DETAILS s,.,srA, HILL LRa. 3 , AEpp, I/O DATE REVISION BVL PRELIMINARY Opp c,. a0 ifs9t°. VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V OOG 81 24FSO SUMP COMFWITIoNFLADHING RODF DRAIN z4'so-LEAD - -j - Ffr.OF-DRAIN --- _ -_ _ 441PoNG I' I'1i`,\ n FI- HIND. c _- l%) F,K1TE 90nxTZf 9K LITES(4) I:VLj.• —• 1_ - t— DRAIN PIPED AND 5EE DET(-TYP v • Mr, I ,,-.Nor DROWN• A•C! oI ERFLOW LP A1IJ To 3EE MECtNNx v- 30FFT-TYP.9EE DE . IM RIG/O INSUL F41 (T PLYWOOD ROOF DRA/ 7YP oF4. TH DED AIILET - a SHEATHING M THREADED OUTLET SEE DET- LIAIDERDECK __ CLAMP ROOF DRAIN / / \ 20r•O• ' I I 20'-D• U O ROOF DRAIN'IN SUMP 1 mj 1 v 2 LEAD lD APE FAN HAND 11DEW FOR ROOF PLAN OF TYP OF 6 I i ill LMETA DntW bNEN THIS AREA SEE DYAG A•AI I TOPP-SfM FLANGE 2 COMPos lCN El FLA-1IINO 4 Zx REo'D-M/N o" m s OE D/URCf:FING I LARGER THAN PIPE BUILT-UP ROCK oN I PLYWOOD DECK PLYWO SILAATFIG I! r O 2t4 D EA s1DE IN EE MCNANICAL O o c STWN TRUSS CHORD VENT SIZE I I•P P WZ ADOVE ROOF DRAIN INL OR OVERFLOW DRAW.. i d VENT THRU ROOF I J \ I MUCH CURD- 3EE DET T •`- IV2"n Ir_Oi GY1FO PLAN TTPICAL' q.0 DL.OG NORTH I CH: 15 0 N Ar. 5 j I C^ 1 u.y]- y\.VEHICLE t' I Vf(/TEST AREA YY aye - I PH,.I Is I 111 l 0plh • a G, i ii. I—, N.. I I; STORAGE A 1f I to S ,.. C 0 N I -----r—T---TT---TT— —TJI iNN 1 I r dr 4!Or 12 r.OI - !9r-pn 12'•O'4'On 4 A9 IZ-O°4!O I2- p I d SEE DWG A 11 FOR PLAN of I- 791-0° 1- THIS PORT-IOU OF DUILDING FLOOR PLAN-6UILDING "5" 4°=I'-on MUT- ff} DFS - CH2M Da-OI-- STATE OF WASHINGTON IIM PROGRAM VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) BUILDING B: ARCHITECTURAL A•B1_ OSI HILL wa NO DATE REVISION BY AM MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS FLOOR PLAN&ROOF PLAN DATE b b1pa/A1 F.1, r in... I.1„ til ,sr t'To r qg. %.".7 I;i L. II,' i I I I dr i til/ /' c 1a I 1 / o It' m ,.f., U 1p1; 6 7, i,:. v.. .•1' .• iZ so f 1 1 l r..t i 1 H CD 1 r rr 4 ° R- ..r SJ".,'f y S - s— 0. , t1.f{N'pu vi._ T.url h o em ir ,, ct f' tflT ;i4 4 § C-- jitNaffiva :-4. 44 L' . :1-1:1,,,..-,,v,,.,--, f•-•--- -' 7t:. p 71' Ey% :. .-",.,..:..;7. • J.I as';`11111kf; ::a- z- 44:sr WI' .4 - ilaf x . , ,.. 1. .A. r...' 1 i\4F'e- G ,6A00 = f j , -' s I 14. > r-r t 49 l . — may) e...• :awl . - • I $ r ., .. - ,.. 4-:'4'.'',.2-_,-,,z. 7vv•,-.':,:'.':7i - - d 1 i l I W S• I ss -c o. 4 • -,\., te N ...b..4 --- '7 \' 71 -. e .,.. 4.— T7.?----t[ 4::\:. ‘ 1\‘-‘) ' M .7:: '—.1.:4___J 7 ..._4'i..-. I• IIIL j "'la .4; je ,,::i ! E0,.. 15 t NG.D. • 1- TI', INC'.f.. { 5'-005-8I V .006 8.1 , t. ..: n`t•:,Y.wt,x1xi .l..A.•.n/if•:.l A"_ ., ,w.. .r .. .' S,Y. f3: , i Li'xFi: r• ZONE ' ,..: ,.;,4U E'.. :-_ : M'I'N`- LOT > ZONE , - USE MIN LOT SCA E:;:". -_800_ -. R-1 Sine'. Fam. Res. 7200 SR-2 Two Fam. Res. 1000.0' '. SECTION 11 SR-1 Sink. Eam. .Res.' 7500 R-3 Mulit-.Fam. Res. 5000. 1 r G . _ Sin! Fain.: Res:. 35000. R=4 Mufti-Fam. ,Res. 5000~ G=6000 Sin Fare. Res=. 6000' ." P=1':. . PubTic" Use'` 1° Tiii G-7200 Singg. .Fem. Res.. 7200 B-1 Business G-8400 Sing. Fam. Res. 8400 r BP Business Parking PAGE I G-9600 Sin Fam. Res.' 9600 L -1 Light Industry I GS-1 Sin Fam. Res., 35000 H-1 Heavy Industry S-i Si. g Fam: Res , 40000 - y T Trailer Park 9 R-2 T:1o• Film. Res 7200 7 il-P u 1 s Affidavit Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KINIl.'., . f3 3Q .o...fioie being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and sad ys thafilb' ....is the THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and public ed in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Count in which it is published,to-wit,King County, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Washington.That t o annexed is allotice-..® ?... C RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERRENTON,WASHINGTON• R639/ A PUBLIC HEARINGWILLrgBEHELDBYTHE RENTON LAND USE • as it was published in regular issues(and HEARING EXAMINER AT not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period THIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMB- ERS, CITY HALL, •RE- NTON,WASHINGTON,ONof1consecutiveissues,commencing on the MARCH 17, 1981, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE 1....day of.....i .XC$ 19.81....,and ending the F01-LOWING.PET.-. .. : Public Notice 1.JAMES E. BANKER G8-1 to SR-1,file R-011-81;day of 19 both dates Application for special per- property located in thevicini-inclusive, and tha such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- mite to construct two-story • ty of 1718 Talbot Roadscribersduringa1ofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee (65 foot)office condominium South complex which•would ex- 4. JIM TONKIN/IOLAceedthemaximum35footNELSON!charged for the f regoing publication is the sum of S..,(.,,,which standard permitted in theL-1 Application far conditionalhasbeenpaidinf11attherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforthe ,zone, file SP-111-80; pro- use permitto allow construc-first insertion an per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent pertylocatedinthevicini of tion. of storage' shed forinsertion. 405 South_7th.Street -- C.P.A.records and'addition-,f r,2. VEHICLE TEST TECH- al office.,s uqarp. (1'acton,. a 6., NOLOGY, INC. _- ' Inc.), file CU-012=81;:pra-_ •Applications for site approv- perty located at 1911 Maple :i al in IVI-P zone for an approx- Valley Highway. a' a—ea k i; imate 4200 square foot auto- 5. HERMAN..M. ALLEN- mobile emissions testing BACK/BANYAN INVEST' 6 facility and a 15 to 20 foot WENT GROUP'' ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of variance from the required • (ALLENBACH'BUSINESS60footsetbacksonS.W. PARK) . ' '. 1.• : .- 10th Street and S.W.Grady Application for four-lot corn-March 19.8 ;.. Way to permit location of the :,mercial subdivision, Short• facility 40,to 50 feet from the •Plat. file' 014-81; _property_ property lines,files SA-005 located inibe vicinity of 3750 I81andV-006-81; property . East Valley Road. -• rNotaryPublicinandforthetateofWashington, located on the southeast . 'Legal descrl lions of filesresidingat ,_ -, King County.g•,• 'p' corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and • i S.W;10th Street noted above are on file in the Passed by the egislature,1955,known as Senate Bill281,effective June 3. BOBBY A. HALSEN , Banton Planning _Depart- 9th, 1955. Application.for'rezone from,j1 ment.0 1 ' ,INTERESTEDALLPER ': Western Unio Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, SONS TO SAID PETITION$ adopted by th newspapers of the State. ARE INVITED-kJ BE PRE- -., SENT 4T THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 17;,1981', AT 9:00, A.M. TO IEXPRESS 'THEIR OPIN- /IONS. .,-: . 1:;_. Published in'the Daily Re-cord,Chronicle'-Marc 1;V.P.C.Form No.87 R:v.7-79 i..981.,,R63g1. MEMORANDUM March 23 , 1981 TO : FILES IFROM: ROGER J . BLAYLOCK C ASSOCIATE PLANNER RE : VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY : SA-005-81, V-006-81 The app icant has withdrawn the application effective Friday , March 13 , 1981 . The Hearing Examiner will not hear the request based upon the decision to rezone the site to L-1 which would allow he reduced setbacks . II h'I OF I o THE CITY OF RENTON 4$Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 omu BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A 235- 2550 0 P gTED S EF1 MEMORANDUM I Mar h 19 , 1981 TO : Files FROM: Roger J . Blaylock, Associate Planner RE : VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY SITE APPROVAL Thq recent Hearing Examiner ' s decision on the Vehicle Test Technology rezone application removed the need foii site plan approval and variance application . The site approval application is therefore considered moot . RJ: :wr i I i I lir: 11,11 r OF RA o THE CITY OF RENTON U `$ ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z ..LL o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERo 94 O FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2$93 0, 9gr D SEP 00 Ma ch 16, 1981 , i TO:Files FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE:File No. SA-005-81 , V-006-81 ; Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. This office has received a letter withdrawing the above entitled matter from consideration at a public hearing which had been scheduled for March 17,, 1981 . As the item has been withdrawn, the public hearing for this matter will not be heard, and the item is therefore dismissed without prejudice effective March 16, 1981 . Q. F red J. a fman Hearing E miner cc: Planning Department 11/ City Clerk i , J, i 7, II 0I I 7 I l r 1' 1 WI -CH2M HI L engin ers plann rs econ mists scien ists 13 Marc 1981 S14256 . 7 Mr. Fre J. Kaufman Land Us Hearing Examiner Renton unicipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Kaufman: We rece ved your report on Vehicle Test Technology' s rezone pplication (#R-004-81 ) and concur with your recomme dation to ,rezone the property to L-1 . This is to info*m you that we do not intend to appeal and there- fore we withdraw our applications for a variance (#V-006-81 ) and_ s±t approval ' .(.#.SA-005=8:1 ) . i Sincere y—,- — CA12A-) Cheryl ^aback, CH2M HILL for Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. bjd cc: Spencer Clark, VTTI RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING £XAM;NER MA R1 is 1381 AM i Seattle Office 1 1500114t1 Avenue S.E., Belleue,Washington 98004 206/453-5000 PLANNING ®EPARTNENT PRELIHINIARY REPORT TO THE HEA'"YNG Ex.'\?uINIER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 17 , . 1981 APPLICANT : VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. FI LEE UMBER : A-005-81 V-006-81 I A. ' UNNARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: he applicant requests a site approval and a variance or building setback along Southwest 10th Street to • onstruct a 4, 200 square foot building. The building will be utilized for a .vehicle testing facility . The ariance requested is to set the building back 40 feet rom Southwest 10th Street. B. EINERAL INIF®RW,TION: Owner of Record: Delbert B. Anderson Applicant : Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. Location : Vicinity Map Attached) Southeast. corner of intersection of Thomas Avenue S .W. and S.W. .10th Street. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . Size of Property : one acre Access :Via S .W. 10th Street Existing Zoning : G, General Classification District , minimum lot size 35.,000 square feet. Existing Zoning in the Area : G, M-P, Manufacturing Park. C.ompr hensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the' hearing date. ; Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on March 1, 1981, and posted in three places on or near the site as required ,, byrCity Ordinance on March 5, 1981. r i 1 r r C . IN ISTOR1`f'/TWCKGNduUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 on April 15, 1959,' at which time the present zoning classification was applied. It is also part of the Leroy Bowen Short Plat 138-80 (Lot #1) approved by the Hearing Examiner on February 2, 1981. A rezone request from G to MP , Manufacturing Park was heard by the Hearing Examiner on February 24, 1981. DD. PHYSICAL 4 A CKCRB®RDRJD: 1 . Topography :The subject site slopes slightly downward from south to north. 2. Soils : Urban land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick , to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosiob hazard is slight to moderate. 3. Vegetation: Scrub brush and blackberries are the principal features of the site .I 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject `, site (February 6, 1981) . 6. Land Use: The site itself is presently undeveloped . Previously it had been used as railroad tracks. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:ISTICS: The surrounding properties are developing into light 1 commercial and office park uses. The olider residential ' area to the south side of S.W. Grady Waytis in transition to commercial and office uses . F . MAW SERVICES: I I 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12 inch water main runs parallel , to S.W. Grady Way along the southerly border of the subject site while 8 inch sanitary sewers extend north-south. on Thomas Avenue and also along the south side of S .W. Grady Way. i 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transi . : Metro transit Route No. 161 operates along S .W. Grady Way adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools: Not applicable . 5 . Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TIME ZONING CODE: , 1 . Section 4-729, G, General Classification District 2. Section 4-730, M-P , Manufacturing Park District i H . WPPLICk1 LE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAAL CITY DOCUMENT: ' 1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June , 1976, Objectikves , Pages 5 - 7. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR IlUDM!\I J ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor . 2. Population/Employment : Minor . 3 . Schools : Minor . 4. Social : Minor . 5 . Traffic : No Institute of Traffic Engineers data is available for the applicant ' s proposed vehicle emislion testing facility. J . IENVltR®NMIEMTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-210 , a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee on February 22, 1981. K . ' AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department . 4 L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The applicant is proposing constructing of a 4200 square foot building to provide a testing facility for vehicle emissions per state law. The facility must ,open on January 2 , 1982 , to meet the regulations . 2. The site design shows four emission stations with adequate parking for individuals during the con- sultation phases of the testing. In addition, there is 150 feet of queuing space provided on site . 3. The applicant has requested a variance from the 60 foot setback required along Southwest 10th Street. The building proposed for the site is a standard building used in six other applications in the State of Washington for testing facilities. 4. The site itself is limited by a 60 foot power line easement along the southern property line along with a 20 foot oil pipeline easement near the eastern • boundary of the subject site . The applicant ' s justification for granting the rezone is based on the shape of the lot in relationship to two streets and the subsequent imposition of the 60 foot "setback from both streets . The end result is that the building area on site is only 40 feet wide . This is a reduction of approximately 50 percent of the total on-site buildable area when considering similar lots to the east of the subject site along Southwest Grady Way. In both cases the lots were created out of a combination of power line easements and railroad right-of-way. However,, in the sites east of Rainier Avenue South, the access is solely onto Southwest Grady Way and there is no public street on the northern property boundary. Y Therefore, the hardship created is not a result of the applicants own action but a result of location of Southwest 10th Street only 160 feet from Southwest Grady Way . In most Manufacturing Park areas inside the City of Renton, the blocks created are much larger and are not constrained as with the subject site. This unique situation extends only for a length of approximately 4 blocks along Southwest Grady Way. There appears to be no other examples of such constrained property under this specific condition . Therefore , the first criteria is met because of the shape and location of the public streets in relationship to the subject property Section 4-722(3) (a) (4) . The second _ criteria is that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property where improvements in the vicinity and the zone in which the subject property is situated. " The applicant ' s justification shows that the facility will maintain the intent of the Manufacturing Park zone by providing a well- landscaped site with spacious setbacks from the public streets. The Planning Department would agree with the argument presented by the applicant in this case . 5. Criteria No. 3 states "that approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated . The granting will not ' constitute a special privilege because a nearby property to the east of the subject site was granted a variance in 1977 to reduce the setbacks from both Southwest Grady Way and Southwest 10th Street. ; (V-321-77, Dwayne A. Wells-Val Bain) In that specific case , the building ;was a three-story ; building which visually imposed upon the setbacks more than the proposed one-story building on the subject site. 6. Criteria No. 4 states "that the approval as determined by the Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. " The applicant ' s request is based solely upon the internal technical design of the structure., The design is being used in seven locations throughout the State of Washington .to provide this mandated service to the citizens of the State. The equipment design and functioning . of the facility is specifically limited by its ultimate role ; therefore , the request 1 is a minimum that can..be accomplished to meet the desired purpose of locating the testing facility upon this specfic parcel of property . 7. The a pLicant has addressed all facets of bothPP., the architectural and site plan drawings in detail. The building treatment will blend inAvith the typical small manufacturing building in the area. Basically with the ultimate intent that after the program is finiahed, the building can be utilized for. another purpose. The internal circulation and parking 1 pattern is designed specifically for vehicles to enter ..he site , proceed through the testing lanes, ' and then if there is a subsequent problem, to park and address the technician in the offices. Redevelop- ment in the future is covered by the present ordinance which would call for another site plan approval when this operation was finished. 1 8 . The lan-dscaping plans prepared provide for heavy screenings of evergreens and evergreen shrubs along ' Southwest Grady Way and the use of london planes to blend in with the. theme of the Manufacturing Park development along Southwest 10th Street. All of the sizes and spacing appear appropriate except for the Shore Pine along Southwest Grady Way . The trees are anticipated to be four to five feet in height and will not provide a substantial visual barrier since Shore Pines are very slow growing in nature . Therefore , it is recommended that the trees be a minimum of six to eight feet in heighth when planted. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: VARIANCE The Planning Department recommends that the variance e granted based upon the justification presented by Ole applicant with a minimum setback of 40 feet required rom Southwest 10th Street . SITE APPROVAL I The Planning Department recommends based upon the aboveanalysisthatthesiteapprovalbegrantedsubjectto Ole increasing of the size of the Shore Pine trees to be planted to fall into the range of six to eight feet in heighth . I I I I I 1 I I`I I I 122.11 • Plann'`i 1Z-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION] REVIEW SHEET Application : SA .t ''PCI S 1 )®g Clat R'„,141% v Qtetele ergssio fa-refit:few&05v7. r( ts r 0 Location : I ; .:: p .. •- P ®ems® W63mr p mo 61. Applicant: gyp® rine 0 Parks DepartmentDATE :T® SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : : =' Police Department R.C. MEETING DATE : eig4 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Bu ' ing Division v/ e % Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICAT. ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR ING QRI THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE ( 'C) TO BE HELD ON , f AT 9:u0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M., ON WY/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 Approved v/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved 4s //,--/ Signature of recto or Authorized Representative , Date I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO : jTt Li . 6 a-- MAIM MOB 3013 NU 3011 18 Approved V App oved with C +ndi t1 ons ot1c i £.Ap onoditAdv um 3%3S 03AO dd I t'4 03 Aid la/ p 1 j'' ..z lt'' .3333V 1V133dS f'..•fi !. S'l3a903 31.1 ; 23/ e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative -LL: 4i1-.;::;;;;ti-ij, ;; ;,;•, :ate I I I l I I 1 I I I f I I I I I I UTILITY APPROVAL SIIIMECT T LATE COMERS ACRE91f.UT • lt 'c„-~_ S w•4za • ATE COMERS AGREEMENT • S.{;•.t;sirs (/'1 Cv? ,vor.,retearld"cY ANCesst4:42....) YSTEM DEVELOPMENT-CUM. • r4 YSTEM DEVELOPMENT Ciff4i;. • e, _ YcS PECIAI ASSESSI»EHT k11FE Cr, 1.":C...;Nn PECIAL ASSESSMENT IAIIEA NO • APPROVED WATER !'. y [i F pr)0,r,,w 14`49S v2G4as,o D APPROVED SEWERt'ls'il r tlo w+p'^` CWT. - Tc'ciao PPROYED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS y`- DI FIRE DEPT.', IRE FLOW' ANALYSIS ri Approved Approved with ,Conditions:'- Not Approved AL) ro%'y i 7 u i dear-i-r,- Garr& -s I yP S dra /frt. af-e. Ale/LC C ) °10110 T•G+-- 7=ice., .Z-7I-1,red mom»:• cz// 71 . . as¢s/.25 3.)nt..r re / re_cL -,& o/if/A fit) S, -,• 1airrall roaeof fly v rdiaC vet o s' rs G ,r r rv.carrcotTTt Signature of Director- or Authorized Representative Date eM^-^amoDilniaMUM la.P_+.....DM fraki..WT.J.fb....V•4.Q...... e•........,.....,.,..... REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : envy,/NE.t}1 N C:, Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Pr o p o s ecl, p l a k s 5 I-to 1..g-) 3 c,.a s l a, ct° e e,-{-o iigia 07-ditiaG/4-e. 34 ? 3 a/tc,ws cR -. `c Y/ve/ .s "`' z f Qiop r_ .-I '5G.e ( 9-dv a P - 5p2 c s 4- 2"v1Specfio4r ortic Devefo,7 1-4-0 Lid ele. tle)-1)7111 ' .512,Ya SI)ac. e 72 6 r I ki s-, d iGL'e( 3 / ue6 /Gies /S .[JT'y i C./f' 4 f a a C. a() see -td c,-/y. J S t oi` ex. cep d Signature of Director or Authorized Re es ntati ve Date LA_ ea._*r_a.av-a w._mar.D.A-1]t.IA.CA4T-1.[L.La1-1.C..I.11N.. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved XXX Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Grady Way side of the property be improved to its full width(street impt ements on Grady Way)2) Access to the site be provided from Grady Way. 3) It would appear that fill will have to be brought into the site in ordertobuild. If thisi is necessary a cash street cleaning bond should beposted. The route & hours of operation should be approved by bothtrafficeng. & police dept. Signing of the area should be as required bthetrafficeng. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DateHelpintheimprovementofintersection & signals at ('rady & Lind due tothn1argnamntrgrflfi-rnff; h= L„ xx;7 .. t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : K ersson 1/Zi/81 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Ap proved• I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ii irItci1 t S. w— Tn+— , y:w I - , ; B i I.•;I1.. e 21.., i.. I', v•} L : 1 1 1..4iIl. o,-'' c' p, l. l": S Sim I.r•y'-' •, , I 1 t r S J ..+£. 2• y/" t. F I III i v. . 1; Cir'Orw R I. ••0'" x`,./ I, S( ASL` '2 t} F" L• iif •M IFT Ir rye' M I-.`tM! ry-• , 1 ..,_- •----.:•.:,'" I '•( i i \;'. 11 i A.'....lip.. 'gait - „r ' ..Y:. t yr n . ter'+' Q V 2-I t r y y Y t T M 7 ,.r r• 1 ,a j 171 -A,' • 1_974_1 ni. ,,jieh"....- i. :. la . : .. .,1Se ob..' —.I.. 4Yx ..•.. N• tf,- I .y. ., • ,,: - may/, m„...„.,.•-,_. -'+, p ,.'I. I ..-' J.. T J'y 1 :• • "- le,. 410.4r.111 e I jam• 'j t' " 1• '•' - -s k 1 .=•.4 1. +.. rat.:!n._- .wY'•"G'2S4li •.i_*N•RoR4Pq .3ii!tit:14 #'_cr.. _S"',,•.i',^:•cYs e.. -,t .;C•f'... O p I dui44 V.--' - a% ' 1 p , 1II i i• j - - [ - j : t" t t 2 t. , • ... . If.-.IL -1,3. . ciol oar Nam. a 1 '`-• ,'.: . -.l a=':e ' ^•` . p_ 1. . • : 11 `, .: V. : -•.. rt 0A• :.--I Q . .:.t p, . . O .. ., 4 . L ',ma i VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. SA-005-81 II i ' I APPLICANT VEHICLE (TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. TOTAL AREA . +one acre I PRINCIP L ACCESS Via S.W. 10th Street EXISTIN ZONING G, General Classification District I EXISTING USE Vacant I I' PROPOSED USE Automobile Emissions Testing Facility COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park 1 COMMENTS 1 I 1 l• I' I' I I• I CO -i 44, , y.4,• 1, 4 .: 41:72'.171:1-,..,,,.. 44/,(; i,,, ti„,,, vazi- ----,, 0•,,..., LL.,4:1%-r-4, ;• S W24:53766fittsiv ,• ' V;To?.,,,.. 5 rk,' 1/4‘4'''',''''-'1. 3.‘,'•::.^ :L.,P I. A---- '''''."411..;•: -.... i,:.• , ,::'., :" ';‘ '• % ' . ' t vatz:MO'''''' "M"'w,F" ..74-41F=5"...1„,, 1"3itZis1Tact,, ,,,, zrzr,, -V.:4.'1 ', , . '. F.4.• :",,.••;, )1,: .;:1". ",--, - , • ,••••*425 . •- . ' 1 '• -,,k, •;• .' • 'i . 'I"' ' I , -i : II - 1 '..„ I Orlits,.;.:, r'''; .,' i::::fi'`"J''':: :'; • ‘, ' : ',: ;:,•,-1,-i:'. . : • ,.:‘.,, .:p..\.!,41! 1, 6:,:,t,....:,,.. '..,,., '•,..:,-:,„....:: .,:'.. .2:';' : P.2.tNg13 :' .. ":'.''.'''',' "1,''''' 4.-i''1 '.ig-Wer,)4):.-• ''.'.i'., :•k6i,c5, ;:itf;.`::'''..,'.'4.:;'... ...i...:: .';;'''','.:.: : „1" .u,. 1 .1,, ,.,,,. G.(i i(PitcAl i lIt'-, , Jr V•ti,,,,A;(,.1.i..:,:i:t.,-,•..-• t::,,, ,,,,,.; •.. •,, 15,,,,1,.„v-J.k001,ii I '„. .,..,, 4,'''IP, ..!.. 1111'' i.,}1,,'•'",,,/,./ iq,,')''',A fl:k„:,,,'/•.:;.;ES„,;•,:,.,.1,,,:•-...-i• fiel t I.,t,', .•:„..!-,."..- e•i'l, fit,'',..,'''f•••., ,''.i...'••i ptgC4,1.16Z 72: '••••`2,..%',, :m1.,„-T4,...,,,, ,,„ 'i.17,„...7-71 z., au. .........14.,. .,,. r, , iti....WrIIg 1!:;i P:)55.:. ..1. :I:..:', •.: .,.,II '.0...*Pt'0' l' r41"'". _. . t, . I it•.:4,•:1••,,It-0,•1• - ',t. ;.1 . •;" fic:;s•P• •i"'.;`"•';'‘L•• • 1,-6 2.1• Itri.r) .:' 1''''',/...‘•'''''' . '"'' V'., A • ri•"'.'4,'' " • -/.;•';:•2'.' '.....1.4 ji.••J 0 ", ,C,';,,,,,'','•'-p....:41•';. 4 ' ',.,... 1 ' '!":'''';i''.'''. .--'...'-71'it t. r2,,,,,I,,,o...,. ,7 .'9,,ft.tte, -k,;•,•,• .1/4% , i4 i, 1,TIA'1:- 1:1","'‘t'',.'.,,0,ri,l'•••,,. 41i" . a.,`:,_?,,,,,-.-.0 l'44.,,,tti,;!,.11.. 1'.!-.! z.i.S, ......'•;,-; it pktiAS-1.;',i,: _;13i4.1,0 rt - ,,....114), ,,iri .,'„ii,I., .-...;:,k:,,..• •4 1'. 11:',.1 2: „ 11-40.....g.,,,Akt.... 1 ' 1 .• 1,..„,........._ rrir'''1.-,k,.4t"PV‘q''‘. k,,,i:6VriP, Pi-''''':I •eziP i.4.'..'s;"''''. c.r) c.;:•••fr.•:!ft:y-k_„0,,,1••-!.`,,., ',..0,4:,,A. ;I: lotdT,'..,•::;0,••-„•;,•'), -•',•-•..• tP1V.p.0' .. • ....., .,,4. ,..ki-1•.,1 , ., . . ,. ., *f•a',..1,:• 4•':,• • i•-,•,,:f.,.... u .. , .1.35 I . 1;i:!..!,,T... .., . • <4 1 tr)1 ,,r r1.. , ,b .-10' -,....,..---'2. , 4r,,, . ....,1.... ",-,7.••:".,.;...... ...,1i::,.. i,. •,:-.. ..,-....-.....'.f.z.p: a• . 4`ee 4...• -e••' "‘"715,' .--111f' ::1''::'.' '‘\'!'.:"14, "''.V ",. l,-.'',°1.4...! ' .',.‘''' •°,'•,'• :o : ' Z,t441...:411Hkittc,31nr. ' : 41., 12.;,,,,3;•34.145/1113-0 Xit4111 -.lir:: ''.-.1cze. j :,.''' ,: 7.. . ' .. '0' 71• 4,0' • L'H7 i10.•,."()::..•'",'•± ..." . .,.a.' 1 t 'r• r!.:4 7irt:4 2•• :. ,-.:. "'ti, ' 1 i t .,••v••••-e 1, k.••'4411 '''' ‘!"' : 1•‘:'' ,C.V.1::, 1-4' . '''...: Ili ‘.::•' ' - ::.::• ' ARLINIGT( N...._., r1 4:1," ,,,4i, A.44, ..^ A •,, •.',.-„,:-. .' i• 1 1?,.."-V,,,,,,, ',..,,7:;,..N, ''''-',..c. I e.,';•"-f:,,.• '•'.'',.:..\ . '...,. V 1.0• . riii ii 1 ND li I R 1 a:1 1,\'• 1/4470;.f".,•'•'!'-'i 3. 4./ • '. ,,I' .'i 4 • N I i, 1 e•••OX;•.1..',,„:, ,' t 1 ' 1 i 1%.V.:-0,', ' '';.';'';''t tr.:/. .., , . , . 14. :?..•'' .: ...:3:,,,,•.J.,'0..„..1:',;•ilt I <-. - ti t tr,F. . , .....„ RI t , . o,ke„...-.! -,..,„' ,„,_,..„,, .., i,!. i, ''''''{ L. ... 0,1,t-it• ...t.-., - e -„ 1% : ; '1,'',\Y,',' ,,,...•••.-""'''' •,.. Lo. ',7.g• 1 ._-.0erl.t fr, ' 4.r.. .. ;.el..... A • \,,,,.. 0:; ,,c t t t t ev r.i• • - • 4 • i.4:. : . 16L .,,...„.0.• <,, _, 7, .,.... 4 pr, . .men - ?Ai,' • . ., 4•••••• 44°4.,,i'.'>;1} ..;.,.• ''' 44 t\Ni I • .1. V . 4''' 2,-4,,,,,,...,.00..... re- r to 1aiN,1 ..;,,-..- e ir -.• g At.v, S p 1 r 11 ':.--'--------. I -- ti----,1 '--- 1,, .,000:4H- tr .;,,. ,.,,,:. , N.,j ..,, S li:ift4-....:. ,--•-'•t, ' - , - r ( •N, .-•-1--- ..1.---,. CSI:CI". • e47'-.... Li ,-'''''' %.• :.,,, , ; :,..0 I 4.:‘ 7,•= c„..... 3.51:ede, l''' '_ i rir-tc!....r, 54.' .i.w: 1....:Isr , .,. 11 4:...,,-,_,..,- ,.. 1 " ' ' A!. ... ',i'v, .1E:rv-rf'‘-- ---- iL ..r..Qw ...- 717.47:::" vr..,7Th=.'-..„, , 1 i -J!I 4..0.e.r:s' L.,.,, !.. k.... lrx.7.7.rn..,_,• _ 7,....,,,=7.,.....t ;:.17''' ;,.:,cf.;"%'00.s, .,,,i,f-\ 47-t cti 1 t`.4 i :P;i0..f.,---., t,.1%-,11 ...e.,,,,-,‹...A• tct• S?...-'›..'" ........,,s-,z, ...;17,77 ,"". '3.T.-.,ax.:&,-;...2,4--, ..co t r r'', 0,.'".."! .•)'4‘.-4.;.. -4.,4• c..„,p,-,3co+. ..,,,:,••94,7* ...,,,,,4. .; -•• Ir.:: vs. 01:400,0., tr.••''''', ;;V•••' I r 71 1: 7:::;;;T: 04iiii.„ .;i . 4.:,114\ l':?'''. 11%,,ficiff,,riVtit 1.,tt...:•,.. t... 144 f„1.,..„7 , • vr.7.,,mrm,„,-F'i'-';',.'..,. ..:''''.''.;•:r)..,..:';•••••s;‘;;-;',., ' 6T H I- . 7:---- c1.1"v&''''' ''..:' V::,''''., fr6rtrr''''9:'.J'.-1' .?": 2' ''''' r'' A -. 'g'14,4•,,,r1., '.''''•''•••t.• •••'• .\ ''V 4..,. ..,',:.. . 7 t.4.r.'7,..,..• ..„, ,:,..,..,..,,,i,.,,. .,...,,,,,,.,-. .•1,-.I", .,.•,-;,:., r___,_ .0, '.,,4-e.;?': .'.f,2.:I.,,.:.,T,'.;-:.:ti''..: .;;:i',.41:::,'•',. ..,,P,-. 4•.':'..,•':4,c:.;'''.1,', 1;:•;,...-:.,; 1;,. 1- r. k.„:','t r40i:.-.-.'.•:,?1/'1,.. 7:,i,.:'; vi' Z}. 4t.ti..':,:.312.1A.kt':'!Cl.':"...t'::': ..?.i-il:,').'i.::-..,-0., ita i; +.:, 4;•i,•L;•.:1,;.,;.T;,.;,,,..,;;:::•1?,,,_ nii',i.,-..i''',• i'.P';`,1I'lifl,,.f.'''• 1,',.."i•:'r''''•F;1'A ''•i• f..i'.;:i...4 tII• r 1,,-t-3'-';'.- 7,..4.,.?....,,,q.,.A,;.'....171.-!z;t•fl,•.i..1,2,i;;:z;t'';,/;i,;.f.k 1 t;-'1•r,;1-,;•.,"ii-.::.C.,.i:; fgr7777-Ig1147:31,frt::,Z,241,i's'7.:''rie L.'-'. ,•.:.;:•.:kil-.r:1-;1131 41,','';:..p• i••••'.v.! 1 itt;4•••:.0A0.W,••4... ,:f-..P.'- !1•;:.?, 0..4 i'sAt: ., 1,,' t.:',W.,,t+.;,4,,,,1,,t1j;•1` 0,'Al't'. 5,1"1,•.:J ro..e.;:•4‘.i;:i;'Y'..',11.91,Zet'n t•'..ii?..••v$4- I, $•i.3......,•,'';',t'.'',.te.?"6:•.:,f."'..'14.,'4r.V:3.-?•',.i '.:;1'..v,!..'.=•.',•,• ,4:,f4,..,! k-''. z,".$,I,r R,,_ 7.1).,,,,.,. i..,,, x,u,,,:y A tj'i•! .:0(Y);.!4 •:''.!)0•0'''. `i!.,','Og:\ri.,".1Atir4I:A• 4•::;,"''4M 1 0, 414'1 '0 lirkik,. --,, -,t,,..,,.;, 1:• • ',0,0:•it,q,r,11#;:‘,.• ,y i.,,fi,,,q,-.. ,,',..e.?j'It‘ ,.-.F '• . P-:; .0,,i,-,:i-;x it,,t',• ri q A,...?-i-. 1 A..b". /Np.0.• •04,,.v.t„,„1,,,.,6. .•/`••• 1';'',';',1'.•';''•;1`• •;''''.i .'.tt •;•:‘,A .• tqc1', ii`t",:t`.4tq ,htifirAr,; 1 i'\ ktzrA 44-'1,110.i.,t,-24'. ''1).•1:_' 4',1-41:)o,"4'leo•'.2'44!;.'i ,A•11.:.,;..::1::..,:l.).,4'0,,,, „1:.:!i-7.'.7-.'.1z.'J':i',".!,,I;,-.N".,c4.t.'‘A-,,.!-rroi;;J-if4-';',% q(0'1 ''...0177,,!..li)ift,'ITk. 0:CV. .'01&;•,, 0,1.•iv,..1.441.,;.i''^:4:;•-Cli 4 Iii'I' 4'''' '!'V,'.''•'''"1:'0..1t7'01,' /I''0 14', :"1 1,it,''.".1',; ••4.C.k,(4:',1'..I 1 41 ,I.,,"%,;.'s,i C.d..!;,...',/:•-„.‘3.,-..1,)•,-j. t4 4 i....';;;.-iII.,-1,,.:•:lit',A.I,,,Vi';' ,4,4:..ilt.,`,1,-V:-,\ 1 i110,,,,',-i'l`'),',..4:.-14,-w,,, o41.1!e4,..;,.••,,i-.4..:•,,z,,,,.tAfpi,11, -0:..=,'R.,..,,,,,,.,--,,,,,,,4:•;jk' li./, t':'44..1.;%),;fit 4, 44.:-C'''''"1/4;t:i'T t(.1,1-'4 .14' 4-Vg•I'''',.1 ri't'iiti5rtkt;"A I f.,4; ;,..)4.- Itk„ ,•,.;t„..j." tilf7i1'i.,'. n• .:,'.4cP•7t•',,:xtfl!..i'0,.'•;,.9 1,1,41/4?%itbe, -::',,,.:;,,:ff,,t,:,01,,,,t,0 It,., .4.0.0.1)4t.!. 0-711 t5,4t,-,.4:,,,,,st•?4,;0,41,04.,irkkikpr,'mik,..' i • 0-- ip, ;4,- .,. .,v,,,,N4..4.,1,,,•,dri' . i,,i•vp,..g,r, .,,,..,.4. ,•ge,„.K.,iiif, • :A t, ,••'?,.k.,-, !,•-•,-,.1 . •,,yiklper 4.-i .'14,1i,T.3,10km:•'t tte.o',i„Ai', LO. .....*1 ;xt).1.:!:,, t,,,t:l.v.tt i, 4 "A.:.%,;t6';''ktf,O,L,' r .. 1. i93, 5,7,T.;‘,...Rit,,,,:k,4-kia-m4o-x-Aii'tl lik v., I::,L..-41,- .;',1.-..:41q,,;., iz• 4.3,,,* v..4,,,lif.„.,,pp,.. Nqr, • ! t, t,i,st,o;,,,A,t,, `:.311,11.e,.mtloi. 44,, VA; 11,,,; p3,4 A '''t 41 Iiitql.k.-AAN'Intr- lirttl-xie1 JAK)t, 31.0.3.1 pvt..,0 tVI -,/i/ •,,,,q„ti4- liffm.yhtm,iit;:l4,e61:•:-.XfN)iAtZtr.Vey.',-i,•:‘, i tifilick-Nisi 44.ps„.0..",-tro.ve4,14:1ri... -,t-,. 7, ,.,0•41:1:. qitt.,,,k,,,vt,'..*,..., e Itt-:ffeatk.!,.mw11 1/4,' 1.AV.- --tkivt i 1 J ra:Tal•• 1 1 Ex 1 ,,. 1 C _no'c_r- L, p 1.___1 .5, ...E k —AG-RlaAbith I IKPL1Li - Lic74-1-r 5-1KY F-Am, ,,., ,, 1 HI - i---I ..AVY i JPL]YtRY 2- Lowy5K151-ry K/114. 4P- MEE(uM VeN511 ,/ Nilulle( c, - c_DANd Kci,b,,L, 1 P-L_,IG-1--1 251- 1,31 Ne mi„ 1 vi-- --rz,\R}WRE;icAcr,A- op7 , ------, - 1Vr)i,r2- PI IN r /cA c-.1 . Vil iRli i r VTTI, _ INC. -- SA-005-81 V-006-81 COORO/Nf47C5 ir r '•• PT Kt NORTHING PAST/NG /w9noN Qyyy,, i-.., •', 000.00 2000.00 PRO.:COdVER V d f, .` c`:'`..1 1:e' 0000.00 2290.00 PRO?C4G45C O /OCfo.GO-- -2/05.IE BLIX..009NER 105a.00- rib/-/2 Bcc4 caevFR H.N 4 k 9 i 2 1,59./ 2247.2 E0GE ACP l t 5 l/5B2 Z244./ C7RRAoiUS 4 .22 • ya92211/" L- 35 CAP NAJNVN/CNT 1 w Iv /a2s a -2245., --^-- I / t I I ) •,`, 092.0 2239., _ .. T I I 1--- till j `),• I9 /092 0 2223./ __ -__.- -1-- N--^ ---/ < 6h _- l" SW TCTNTH sr., e ,••' 20 /0300 20B0 . .. 666--- may 5'•' 24 O' L/NDERG•PUUNO ETECTR/C E F1:QNE t0440 2094./ .• • ---J'G3l+- e:s. gQ O• Q Ex/5T/..G C[RB Z-G'e 3-•'CM/IX//15 .9./S TSO MCA, 22 //40.9 205/./ •• _„ TO RE----- 01 I 0 BE 5 o'ar CN/STRUCT.W/ 44e=a390ELYaEAfP 1 ----- j1t/ t'1 2 I50 Q -ns• 40.7 2039 0 c7R,.,/us t t--• -=.. ..,•A•-. - . .Nw . atq ' t/ J a' _ -- v.9--45.2 Otte..../ •. ial ra P- g9'R 6ez 4 ,g-L I i + 27 /,4 6 2 2,44.2 ^ ' N//50 FACK,Tr R7Y L/ R I 5GN o NB ! ' / I I ALl._20 //9/.2 Z/74./_ IAi 9 ME 70 THE EGU'E OP ACO UNLESS TanIsEWER I p6 6EEOE I ALL O/MENS/AVS AND RAO/!5 CACLOI/7''• 29 /,9,2-- 2229 2 --•--•-- HP u, H I3 l6/ 6 `IR e F/( e) 073/ERW/SE NOTEO 90 ,/,,s S 2293./ EEL V E35 El e4 t I`J I1 i 2 TO FIND 7HE RAO/US OF THE FACE OP 24 ze Lq /R 200' N THE EXTRUDED CU205,AC OR SUBTRACT 5/ , //42 2 2234.d_--.•--- I l EE,S'-.FE u I FEET AS REQ'O,70 THE RAO)US SZ I /t4'1 5 2,44.t /N-/ IE !e fl L - _ - 'fg •11T SEE FAC 7I/E EGCiE OP ACP 99 /IOS.2 2Z45.0 cB-,wd Plo'C e40 I! .'o`i p' I 1m94 79 5 2233 0<B-2 fa JS 99 M 0• :II gLSG 2TINE eu/LO/NG COOROINATE'S 22295-I/090.5 2/44.4 00-SI I I V V ``, b•re-/ '•1'-.O-_ I/ 0 Ay/ 6 / l' GU/GO/Np TroE'd• I'/.1'1• - I OR REFERENCE IN LAY/NG OIVf THE REST 9u 70.0 20T9./ CG•9 e' LL r O.7a SI7E 37 /032 O 22/B./ CTRRAp/USy e. 7x4, CODRO/NATE 5`l9TEH'S ASSUMED.TRUE NO.0TN 8 l//4.0 2I03./' CTR RAO/uSII QW 9 0 l/ --• }- 51 CGL STD BEARS N/C'.53'24-W FRUM 6/TE NORTH TrTTT...+ryrylMM t59 ///L.O 2/B// eO__CORNIR M N DET! 1 S. FOR NANO/GIPPED STfv'/P/IW SEE OETA/L,n 40 //POD 2/0// ^- ' I I TB d j x,'..'; 0 j_. C LI 6 FOR 5TAN0/120 STAL2_STRIP/N6 SE8 OTA,L 4/ //20.0 22/3./ • . g!. 2, 7 r! 7. PoR STRIP/N6 04/N TS SCJIEOULE SEE CET 9/ L1 n42 /JG20- 22/9 / " • f'---.- /._._/.._.- .-__ • 4! l v2 •.) /d. FAQ 5/6n//N6 V1/F-LYJLE SEE DETAIL AA__,:as,,,,_... I 7 _ 44 /200./ 2045.0 HONOHENT L"-T I'' --i-- Le-• -n--..-.-..^ FOG - T.• I-_- 20 B'-/' Pp,((J -59 9 IERT/CAL 047UM MS50 0V ASSUHEO cL OA ro,A7 7-1 fit7di;I'IfIiDUdv BRASS CAP IV MOVUMENT AT/NTER3ECT/ONOIE¢EAO/25AV fPYER 95 ZO' 9 9'R CF SW TENT,ST.ANO T S AVE SW FWNT 44. BOTTLY,L/NE NEUTRAL-EL an. TO IrI U !T • j5 nPPRb.< USCG:. daTCJN 6L/6.5. Id J F N` le 0 yy I I PRTYj ICLW OTT-P k'rFUTgtI F[K I 1 W I y}I r IC / 520,93 RVO L1PF/NAfi2. I 1I IIQ 50 ill SAVE LINES 1( 8 I A 81 I •171 i i 1 l 7`QQ BY EMS/NEE,e p v I I N d m O p'T20 3nO 40 W v u m m /f / IL 5 1 o3-4.‘1 OVER-.2-AO . ks'E.P L/NE I` 20 I PA02270Love7Y L . I I V I / 1 /'--' - I k 5W GRADY FY EOCG Qa FKVC ENT I01- •y' CSEME/A'E w 0 r a I f'LAA/ 1 W' S--____k • ___--o----_, / 2y DM b Wn 1 U.B CH2M DM LAG STATE OF WASHINGTON I/M PROGRAM ' SITE 2 SOUTHCENTER 2.C•l rvIG SW IOTM ST.&THOMAS ST.) v Illt R( VEHICLE TESTEMISSION INC.) as N1RM MOTON VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS SITE LAYOUT ern ,AO DAM.. HVIaMM It. M90 S141571314, VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V-006-81 N.,m... . 1 I / ° i 1 20'OIL PIPELINEe EASEMENT 40'SETIVCK REQUESTED I cil L__ __/_i_i__________ ,..41 ,--------------- 50-sS--- T 1 oAect.-4-aRremro e,e-crxx.1.,-,twe x• . • --.ft der---,...e0 I Ii•13G.4...69,,,,,,,,,VEL0,- 1I- P'. .7-. -. --:7 7i ,I. M1'.--- -7-P-"--' . - - P11........,....7..-- I I " 1111111111111111M K1*i:A'ii:i:.i:%':::iKiiiii§i':i..i.:;',iiMii:i;i§:'ii!tii,i.?.. ?:i..ti,:0:::i;::41:';':.iigH:,..''':?.:;.:..iRii::.' i.0 I 111.Mill illigniir:I.a41:103 :X..:':!:4°;) ;g: it 5 .I I ,: .i:!i 4 Ai."Kgqi.',.:;.giagintgi? ':N:i4.16 EiNet:i!fillititig:'..1.:. :Paigig bi.i;'4(iih!':;.;::i.;;i:I.:::: g:60,SETBACK10'SETBACK - .. / ..::::!i.atiiI:ii.n.iriig:::Aigtai.lt.D.fi: igii.:lippia.:434VW'k .;4*.X1-„.:••MEti':4iiiMR,:iii:'::'•,'Zili:::!.:':...::Rtii.: ..RQ'D BY ORDINANCE Al'gireigE0:::tateg'!;.'4:.ffii0•!141gii-iIgl.iinglig:Ef!iiiitinigki::'.';. ••'...]:iig': rle.;i:4i:i4.2;4;;z- i.,;.,,;;,::iigi. ...i .-iiii,.. .-,...;ii,,,,.iii..-..-....-v., 6-:, . ...4i,-...:,',; :, t tii.:,,... ]6 i / t.:i:1: ..''.'. I;.;:aiii:4: 1.:,ii:1.1....'....":::.:' s::,. .,..„.. ,...,.,....,..40'BUILDABLE AREAI / Aiii•Oir •• . '° 4....W° ki::•!•i§:- ti.,iit'.i!:!i]: gii • .---/'- '1A.;:;:::!.;' 4 1:;. i.' illigqinit...'4giEiNyijkOFSIMitqa:i.::,..::":'-':::::':':',,:giNP.XA;:i:,:::a.Wi.;WW,:;;:..%iM::ftgi'l'Oi:ni.!.igyinfp.ii:*:s..1:;im::;-:.i.:.: :::... x...,. 60'SETBACK ANDf.r,ga-Zre,,,,,•• ailianaklegigtefflafegil!tTAMEEMNft:W7,4.!5,..•k*E*-:::::m:::.ix.,%•-t::,..w:: ...:..:i:::::,..,:i.;:i.:::,'...::::.•:,.:,':,.:.*,..:i*:-•;,',i;!*,:I POWER LINE EASEMENT1. .i.i]..s• ::ii.m..:.A:....:::::..,:•:,..,,m,a;i:mv.a.r.]:a:igiwai:i.,?•,:m ::,::0,:ou.ii::',....:*ei•3:ni:,..::: ::3,.::',;•!i:•, i;•iw.i..iii: :,''....:.. :.•.::•,•?::,..,::z•-::.:ii:,:ii--z:i:i*•:,i:::-e::- •Qi::'.!I ..'Mid;Ri:%...:**:: ::giNi;ia::iingigg.iVigNOM.141:EM.A.,!A:4::;,. :i!.,:!.'::4:0Vg:.i:•'..;'-,:f.a:-.'.j!':ing''...:iig::ikaft..i , AIK...kt.:Mii.W 1 ,.2. . :i:-:':. :1 . 4 ,,a 42,7::.„-'1`c'Eo,,,I ._.,;i00,1i.i.i,':,!:,:;;R:M.;::;i;::;:1;.::::.:A:..:;:.':i:;..;::.i:;i.,i;.:-;:.:',::.i::iiii',,:::.;::1;f.i::...::;..ei:$mk]:',, i.:::.::*:*.-iE:*':'':;,..?:..;,':I.::1?,1:if'.i:N.i] .::' ::'::' f.';:.'-'...-:,..-:?-P i t / 41iPROPERTYC/A/E V-i 1 k, E$* gi i kt /SW GICADY WAY1I / i EOGE•=. F.14,, sEn.17-14 III 9 / i Cut FTPELIAJE EASE/NEIN- 1..._ 1,L____________________ ,,-, N L.____ TN ———o--——-o / MIT 0 AO 20 30 40 Du SITE 2 SOUTHCENTER l &INAI CH2M .. STATE OF WASHINGTON I/M PROGRAM 2-C.1 enc.SW TOTH ST.a THOMAS ST.) C.HILL ,,,,, TENSILE TEST TECHNOLOGY.INC.) ' SITE LAYOUT OATS P.P..G.SH1157.01 WO. NO DAM REVISION BY MP. PREUMPNIAY EXISTING BUILDING AREA RESTRICTIONS, VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V-006-81 I / M swat MAPS COSMOS WI V T ANUSCONWPTA SNORE RAE S.SAD (-S. PLAT. A....Poos LIAM.ASPS THE WOG. N .' TNWWA P.m.. NB TW PEOCEDNI S.WaNN Sal iN WPMBEM.YESRVQAOSA PAM SASBWEI Y0.c GC lYa-' M. GA L j •.... haO e PNOTNi4 MASEA PNOWU GC • .au P I/ / t VBBTYars aE.COVERS LEOB.TWUS roc GC eauP.TS 4.t /l • 4 V.PPOTSEDArQCAOPIPTYOPTa, uoc 1/ / • f c,::., ..,—1 ,.. 1 j L Y 1V D--( , 9w rCNTN 5TRET3T o•53•--- • 1n.49 3'i. R. 666----- LC.-- O.S-__ I YeER/cOMrN IesA.- fir r, : re E 06 1I1 I 4I t.41 Cad,l NVPG5 A LQNLYIV/ tiP PLANE f /B Ci, q WESTERN 9VaTu'A x, SL: RGIKECN/C n.'1 TIC CUT-5La 65 v Y v'V/Ee 0 yams"VS I w1512'JEN EPP T VIS.lVib11'i 0,75/ E Ge fY.M/r qt OCEnu 1 E( Ne aeon w/T/r ELEl9CA56. e..- r itit R TN49 Lj.u. I OVA L1l/RU9T/NU9 `.', w/ART R m 'E CC ff OPl w e I[{i,21' aYiOER: k r I "da I l tf aE2• sNO/ pV/AGRIWGBTe101CI / 4: 10i ALdIR I / l® 1 J FOT/NA/ ILYEEa/ I1 .1I ---Ej T' 4164) _ .00G $OVE¢sEAD 25KV RAVER1 IlkBDTTGncNENEDTRAL=EC¢5• 1V gr, v I V I LO (w% cwo/N/A Q/VOERTdaRE Rive I441 o s H l 4' {4A" C'• 7Mk ilF",-......Q,,ws.1-,. , ? .wiAPorTASz(. l 7/ 4 _ ! v , 3Q O 2o , . 0aJAL, Z e0 W`PNOT/./ 11, (/ /' yfCRGAYNG pV/DER SNOIG /NE 'v.- EJ'EE PNG OVDER 3 D //0 33 AOI0 I I l i k_ N i y gym• p pl . 5W Gm..O WAY ER,---.,Co.RdL1CMENT n m GYL A'VEL/NE E N 1 I II EE5EMEA/r I L A A/ 4---- K5 ____o—•--Q WEST W DMSEO STATE OF WASHINGTON 1/M PROGRAM SITE t SOUTHCENTER w 2-C4 CH2M .. sco VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY.INC.) HILL p.. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS MC.SW 10TH ST.a PING ST.) 5j LANDSCAPING frASTOW.. IT -.AV D. slusl Bl igSELIMSYAIlY - -- VTTI, INC. SA-005-81 V-006-81- HOREONTAL 4 FLASHING(TY) DINT I 1 I 1111111 11111111 1 1 111111111111111111 1 pli,.4pi 4_._ =;,- i __.l__ #_.-!j_ -- _r0.,,e_.-___—_—SIDING NoltUr [dT YM R ODO 111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111.11111111k11I1111IIIIIII0I111111ll11111lllllllllll'•k ll ' T.._- _3, 57-..'___. - _-- tl PATTERN'O'PS• cOLOR.O Ill f IIf III 1111 IIIIIIIIII SIDING NAl}ING PATTERN•E•SIDING NAILING LOUVER.COLOR< .,SEE(.- PAT MAN E EA CND OP TEST/AY MS SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SIDING NAILING SCHEDULE PATTERN SPACING OF!Od NAILSLVWOODEDGESFIELD AE A• I2. D e I10. 6 USE PATTERNTN I I OTHERWISE NDED ON DRAWINES• PREFORMED METAL I I ROOFING CTYP) COLOR W 111 111 1 i- MGCN!alllrMENT ON ROOF. Ctf PHUT TO ALATCNOO.7Yr/CA(- „til 1................. ............. SIDING NAILING i--'- GRoove PATTERN i 4 a+ ' - 1`g' Si O 110111111A111111111.1.1112111111111111:11.iiii ALr N MNGL.w I l+D• I OOLOII S NRINEieEcowwowsRIDINGNAILINo Pei CO OR L Ye ILO'NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Ye.AG' Q DIRBUID APPLY TOLDINGNORTHSHOWNON l 4 FLOOR PLAN. I rl/,- , 1',, A SHEET STATE OF WASHINGTON UM PROGRAM BUILDING B: ARCHITECTURAL w A•B4 l CNZM ° u GEEC I—-. is 'b -VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY,INC.) 2 5oa. 1 1 r MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING STATIONS ELEVATIONS wR C HILL O S. L: G; Ir.S1HVA1 N.e. IO. WI REVISION N+o 1 C' • 1. r' 7 I M1E11A1M11T s FINAL ' DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : . SA4i.05-81 1 Enviro mental Checklist No: ECF-004-81 Descri tion of Pro osal: Construction of a 4,200. square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one-acre site. Propon, nt: Vehicle Tesf` Technology'e Inc. Location of Proposal: Southeast corner of intersection I of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street Lead Agency: City of Renton This p oposal was reviewed by the ERC on January '28, 1981 ,' Ifollow'ng a presentation by David Clemens of the Planning Depart-rient.The ERC conducted further review on February 1a, 198.1 . i Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on ap pplication ECF-004-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmentak. Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: St ve Munson Assistant Planner DATED: January 22, 1981 I' 1 2) Ap lications.. SA-005-81 3) Co respondence: ; 1 ' a. From CH2M Hill dated February 11 , 1981 b. To CH2M Hill dated February 20, 1981 Acting as the Re ponsibl.e Official, the ERC has determined this d velopment , does not have significant adverse impact : on the environment. : An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) ' c) . his decision! was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on fil with the lead agency. Reasons for decl `ration of environmental non-significance: 1 .. Th project litigates the potential traffic impacts to the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way by providing 'mitigation in the form of cost participation equal to 3. 5' or a maximum of $3,500. i Signatures : i (V/2;14//e1 l't Z '6,', /, i,,,„:,:.,.,_.... Ron N lson, Buil' ing Director vid R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director A. Rio and C. Houghton;, Acing Public Works Directory-' DATE F PUBLICATION': FEBRUARY 22, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: MARCH 8, 1981 1171.1 ;pi Pl anni nc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : Sair APA40VAL (SM-f (r ett 2a ,.:ekutPAI. (E) i mE ssiot " 46•Att.ttaeCiii4 f e (G1--®®v ere Location : i 64 e App l i cantIr T, Aid TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Police Departmentp R, C, MEETING DATE ; ,. 4t :i,• ,A Public rks Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS. OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATjLO,,N SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR ING THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE WC) TO BE HELD ONORPAT9 :OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE' ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROt 'E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; n /24-f Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ekl.' t ro oyy slit j ,iy u/red , i»'`-- e-orre,c74 s D IP z• O ice,.. /' r red/4 ° ma`s rigoa i rr /n c + 4. i 7i° fo e Gi, S. p- G . Signature of1_3 Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 117:14 Plannin 12-1 979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : SOW' P jOVAL ( wt) a.• uekele enatfistfons 4,41 alit!Ogee 14.1 Oil 4111-AttTCee94--eo6-t)efe r- location : g1,60+, 610 Applicant : TO: larks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Pol ice Department R. C. MEETING DATE : S Public Wors Department gir7ering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICAT ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING OR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE ( ''C) TO BE HELD ON e el a/ AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA55 PROVI,DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; A/C/N C Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved PrU Drj d piak 5 LULC, GlYLVC', wCcP5C 11''1 CtQ e, fr d o d, H ,C—tV_. 3 3 a1/ 3 L/ a v/vcl..s=--j-s RR-7 .. }7'; Z a ea s Gvs tiE tom, 1,3 d__Sc/ f-oyr - 3- 5P H 5 p e Yo/ a/-ram -/ n n G .- l 1. r-/J/ J t Yfd rp e. ke71--dp I''v .-s, c5'.7(L/C/ / V e/t c.L cis <`? c ---,27;.`5j c r L G,_ 15a'a.=. 4 f° G, y / / C a / ex. c e./.74c/ Sigrfature of Director or Authorized Re es ntative Date fe1 Ce , 0( CL( REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/FIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature p f Director or Authorized Representative Date I luZLtgj. ; Planning 1 12-11979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET. Aplp1 i cati on : $/7& Apphow L Op-oos.40.,.. ae.tQaoo'ob eAt'1e gym lions ^ sot `fite(1e v UI'i ttfivt f Jv•-006' de isa,0 I +r r' vow, ‘O' 'fb• tee e ufs 11"-P ow•. Wwwwati• (h road' Location : 4Ft: er..e 1,,•Ev,s„l.o,.a .4 siet bracs. Applicant. ti ''Gi ii.6 phve. TO: dpiks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ' .ZI i Police Department R. C. .MEETING DATE : I 28(ai I 1 Public Works Department Engineering Division i Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department; ther) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED F,IN WR ING OR TIDE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE ( C) TO BE HELD ON1jj6YafAT9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA$4 PROUD THE COMM NTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON I I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved XXXX Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Grady Way side of the property be improved to its full width(street improlementsonGradyWay) 2) Access o the sit7 be provided from Grady Way. jI 3) It would appear that fill will have to be brought into the site in order to build. If this is 'necessary a cash street cleaning bond should be posted. The routeJ& hours of operation should be approved by both traffic ng. &=police ;dept. Signing of the area should be as required by the traffic eng. IS ' nature of Director it Authorized Representative Date 4 Help in the improvement of intersection &signals at Grady & Lind due to the ler a amount of n -Eflr this will g nerate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -- j' x erss1on I/L !/31 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : $ f V c , (sel—a® , t ®s tot 664.peAeete 1rsVG iea t .i I t C1/m®® ere /S'P® ' 0- pet W aivPefoso'";• . ' f I' 6 ®ems® F $®-f° Location :t} A l i c a n t EAve.se PP PTO Parks Department: P SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 02 olice Department R. C, MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Bu ' ing Division I Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICAT ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRiTING OR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (:"'C) TO BE HELD ON I/ 1 I AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PRO E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : .TG eil Approved Z Approved with Conditions Not Approved c 1z-L- Cf%' rote Z Signature of erector or Authorized Representative 4 Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO : - S6SAR V MOii 3a13 13a 3 y A Approved .1 App oved with dndi dons e;a03Qy;10t19:rypidie 'lnoc gAdv i'''1013.•3S O3AOy dl 41.16.NMUS 1,.7i$ 1. 3O z 31SAS 0.) J I f"ly r•"; z.c !Ana JA i1r. 23/8s Signature f Di rectojr or Authorized Representative r4 1_ a yti.g' ; ;,, oil ate UTILITY APPROVAL ISIIDIECT T) 1 LATE COMERS AGREEFEIIT y5.5 w 420 • LATE COMERS AGREEMENT S {s VE6 OUPGailt Nor pnerlvdcc.Y SYSTEM...DEVELOPMEINT.CIIARGF. F;;_; ,:__•_-...(. ••4G55 - SYSTE ! DEVELOI?IET. GUri C : Ef IT .yam.. SPECIAL ASSESSMEL3f6 flE.h SPECIAL ASSESSt EI1 AREA C?Vw.Ii s' .s APPROVED. L1ATER r' V4 y ye [' ,o)19,77ews £Si1 vICaide24n Pue5 S&1O APPROVED SEEVs Z @[t s go • Pad i n.L CWT. Oa- rc..,a IJ643G 2 APPROVED FIRE HYQRAE1T LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS Planninc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : AtAficotou, (Sine-66S.° k0.(pb- ea elf a deette e $a$ib1 Re • ® e4gfilo ®® e t® 7- Pepe 9 s p tee s /9','° ' arc'o '"9 ie Location : 6FE V Applicant: 7 as TO. Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE . Police Department y. R. C. MEETING DATE : .734 , •., _ Public Wor s Department Engineering Division Tr is Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICAT ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WR ING OR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE ( C) TO BE HELD ON Pt lit AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PRO ,4DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ap roved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DateSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentative OF ao THE CITY OF RENTONUw p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 0) BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT0- 5)co' 235- 2550 O4).4 P March 3 , 1981 Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. 421 East Cerritos Pvenue Anaheim, California 92805 Re: Applications or site approval in M-P zone for an automobile emissions testing facility and a variance from the required 60 Boot setback on S.W. 10th Street and S.W. Grady-Way; file nos. SA-005-81 and V-006-81 ; property located on the intirsection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 18, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 17 , 1981 , at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you hive any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB:gh cc: Mr. John E. Anthony CH2M Hill I 0_ It,, I,., , .' • ' : 4' ,, '44n.'6,':: 7; r: 2 1. 4 r.,°,tg I r tr, -/ 4 :,,,` . *4 1 A !V 4 ,_ VI I ' 1 , e -' ,,,!'l ,,, ,2,, - ° 4 s ' t ',,e. ' I GENERAL LOC TION° A ji r' ' kr DRESS° I PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF THOMAS AVENUE S.W. ANJ S.W. 10T3 STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION• LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS IF 1 110111:1 . #' A 41, Iry 7 '0 z, 7t,4, r %Mk,e I w .Le ‘ y, i' 4 TO BE 16IELD IN CITY CiOUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL ltUILDING ON MARCH 17, 1981 BEGINNING AT 9 : 00 Alb MO P.M. 8,, ,C il NCER 1, ,11. rt_ 1 ITEM I REZONE i , tt 4 il,Ecl 't . IN M—P ZONE FOR AN APPROX. 4200 SQ. FT. AUTOMOBILE EMISSIONS TESTING FACILITY AND A 15 TO 20 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREE 60 FOOT SETBACKS ON S.W. 10TH STREET iii 1 lbll I , I "t.*, . , 'y t, v- Mt i A PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE i I EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: FEBRUARY 16, 1981n FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO iE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AU *RIZATION I 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINEIR AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 17 , 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TOdCONSIDER HE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. JAMES E. BANKER Applicattion for special permit to construct two-story! 65 fool) office condominium complex which would exceed the maximum 35 foot standard permitted in the L-1 zone, file SP-111-80; property located in the vicinity of 405 South 7th Street 2: -VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. \ . Applications for site approval in M-P zone for an approximate 4200 square foot automobile emissions testing. facility and a 15 to 20 foot variance from the required 60 foot setbacks on S .W. 10th Street and S.W. Grady Way to permit location of the facility 40 to 45 feet from the property lines, files SA-005-81 and V-006-81; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street 3. BOBBY A. HALSEN Application for rezone from GS-1 to SR-1, file R-011-81; property located in the vicinity of 1718 Talbot Road South 4 . JIM TONKIN/IOLA NELSON Application for conditonal use permit to allow construction of storage shed for C.P.A. records and additional office space (Tacton, Inc. ) , file CU-012-81; property located at 1911 Maple Valley Highway 5. HERMAN M. ALLENBACH/BANYAN .INVESTMENT. GROUP. ALLENBACH BUSINESS PARK) Application for four-lot commercial subdivision, Short Plat file 014-81; property located in the vicinity of 3750 East Valley Road Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 17, 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED: March 1, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBIED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTE9 . Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in Kind County, on the 27th day of February, 1981. 7. A ' \I\Ul ,( l..1 SIGNED: _) ' ) H. I I P j 0 4 APPENDIX A GRADY WAY I. BACKGROUND 6. The proposed State vehicle emission test facilityistobeoneofsixlocatedintheSeattlemetro- politan area. These facilities are the direct result of the State of Washington's efforts to meet pollutant standards in nonattainment areas. The Seattle region currently exceeds Federal standards for carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Clark County, in southwest Washington, exceeds standards for hydrocarbons only. The State has contracted with Vehicle Test Technol- ogy, Inc. (VTTI) , to locate, construct, end operate seven testing facilities (six in the Seattle areaandoneinClarkCounty) . The inspection stations will begin operating on January 2, 1982, and continue for a minimum of 5 years. Vehicles in the Puget Sound region must meet the minimum standard for hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. The test includes: hook upandautomaticallycalibratetestequipment; idle test to measure hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide; compare measured values to standards ; and removal of test equipment. The post-test includes the issuance of a Certificate of Complian e or Acceptance, or an inspection report for failed vehicles. Results will be explained to the owner before the vehicle exits the facility. The projec ed total time on site will average 5 minutes. Hours of operation are 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. , Tuesday throughFridayand9a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays. The facility will be closed Sundays, Mondays, and holidays. The proposed project will serve the Southcenter area with four inspection lanes. The inspection facility will be approximately 4 ,200 square feet with a maximum height of 20 feet (to accommodate trucks) . The test station building will contain public restrooms and an information office for vehicle owners who have questions about the inspection process and for those who need to process Certifi-cates of Acceptance. The employee area will consist of locker rooms, restrooms, a manager' s office, and a general purpose room serving as atrainingroom/lunchroom. On-site parking 1411 be provided at the rate of one space per employee and two spaces per inspec-tion bay. Queuing space will be provided at the minamum rate of 150 feet per inspection lane. One of ;the four lanes will be a spare operational baytoprovideforemergenciesandpeakdemand. 7. Location of Proposal The site is situated in southwest Renton in a flat alluvial valley bottom between Grady Way and SW10thStreetjusteastofThomasAvenueSW. The specific location contains abandoned railroad berm paralleled by an electrical transmissionline, both running east-west. These two rights-of- way are bounded on the north and south by east-west running streets that have been built on fill . The electrical transmission line right-of-way is 1, low-lying and wet, with tall grass being the majorformlofvegetation. The railroad berm is characterized by gravelsoils. Blackberry and hawthorn are the predominanttypesofvegetation. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS lb. The railroad berm will be excavated approximately8feetandtheelectricalright-of-:way will befilledapproximately6feettobringthesite to street level . 1c. The depression under the electrical right-of-waywillbefilledwithmaterialfromtherailroadbermItocreatealevelsitewhereapproximately 14feetofreliefpresentlyexist. 2. The purpose of this project is to bring the Seattle and Clark County areas into attainment for pollu-tant standards. While the local effect may be thedeteriorationofambientairqualityduetoidling vehicles, the long-term areawide effect will be the reduction of pollution levels by correctingthosevehicleswhichviolateemissionstandards. 3. Water flowing in an existing ditch will be routedthroughnewpipes. Paving the site will increasetherateofrunoff; however, this increase will not cause any flooding problems. 4. The project landscaping will enhance the visual qualities of the site and appearance of the gener 1area. The design meets the intent and in many cases exceeds the landscape requirements of the manufacturing park zone . 5 . Although some habitat for animals such as rabbits, mice, moles, and snakes will be eliminated, the proposed landscaping will mitigate this loss ofhabitattosomeextent. 7 . Site lighting will be provided but it will be directed away from adjacent streets. 8 . The project site is currently zoned general ("G") , and it is located in an area designated for manufac-turing park • (MP) uses on the City's current compre-hensive plan map. Approval of the proposed rezonfromGeneralzoningtoManufacturingParkzoningwillplacethepropertyincompliancewiththe comprehensive plan and will allow developmentthatisbothconsistentandcompatiblewith adjacent land uses. North of the site between 10th and 7th Streets and Linde and Powell Avenues is a recently constructedindustrialparkconsistingofabout15large warehouses. The proposal site lies in the vacated Northern Pacific right-of-way on the south side of10thStreet. The only other occupied portion of the right-of-way is an office building to the eastattheintersectionof10thandLind . South ofthesiteacrossGradyWayisavacantlot, a boatand (trailer parking lot, and Cummins and BoeingCompanyofficesandwarehousing. Several of the properties in the surrounding area have been rezoned in recent years from "G" to "MP." Southwest10thStreet, located on the northern boundary ofthesite, has recently been improved to serve the manufacturing park uses in the area. 10. "A" size cylinders of HC will be stored and used on site for the calibration of equipment. These cylinders will be chained securely to the wall and handled in accordance with all applicable fire and safety codes. 13. The project site is primarily served by three streets: 10th Street SW, Lind Avenue, and SW Grady Way. Tenth Street, which will provide direct access to the site, is a recently improved local access street with a high percentage ofIltrucktraffic. Lind Avenue, a north-south secondary arterial links Grady Way to 10th Street. Grady Way serves as a primary bypass of I-405 between Interurban Avenue to the west and Rainier Avenue/ East Valley Freeway to the east. The proposed project will serve approximately 105 vehicles during the evening peak hour in the peak month. It is estimated- that 25 percent of these vehicles will already be traveling in the area for other trip purposes and therefore do not represent a net addition to the traffic volume on the overall road system. The traffic generated bytheprojectwouldrepresentnewtrafficon10thAvenuebecauseof. its "local access" status. The projected traffic volume for the test facility, as compared to existing volumes at the intersection of Grady Way and Lind Avenue, amounts to less than 5 percent.Therefore, it is not expected that development of the project will have a significant adverse impact on the level of service of the adjacent overall road system. The project will provide on-site parking for customers and employees, for a total of 8 customer and 14 employee spaces. Nearly 700 feet of queuing space will be provided for the facility. Mitigating Measures 1 The project includes mitigating measures for potential traffic problems: o An operational backup/spare lane will be available in the event of an equipment outage and for peak inspection times. This will ensure a quick and efficient testing procedure at all times. o On-site queuing lanes totaling 695 feet will assure that customer traffic does not back up onto 10th Street SW. The State has the authority to impose a fine on VTTI should queuing traffic become excessive. It is also anticipated that drivers would not attempt to join a queue which is unreasonably long. Mos - people would normally choose to return at another time. o The hours of operation (10 a.m. to 8 p.m. , Tuesday through Friday) are such that there is no contribution of site- generated traffic to the a.m. peak hour. The facility is also to be open on Saturdays to help in the temporal distri- bution of the traffic. 15. The building is designed to meet Washington State Energy codes. I TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing transportation services which may be impacted by the proposed project in' the Grady Way epicenter include primarily three facilities: 10th Street SW, Lind Avenue ane SW Grady Street. Tenth Street SW is a recently improved local access street serving a developing manufacturing park including warehous- ing and office activities. The street currently deadends at Powell Street to the west of the project site. There is no direct connection between 10th Street SW and Grady Way to the south. The street is within a 60- to 70-foot public right- of-way and consists of a 40-foot curb and gutter section. Tenth Street ISW is controlled at Lind Avenue with a stop sign providing preferential treatment on Lind Avenue. Because of the warehouse activity in the area, traffic on this street has a high percentage of trucks as compared to other local access streets. Tenth Street is signed at Lind Avenue for "local traffic only" with additional words of violators will be prosecuted" to discourage nonessential traffic on 10th Street. Tenth Street is well lighted with 40d-watt mercrrury vapor luminaires, including poles, in the immediate proximity of the project site. There are limited segtions along 10th Street with sidewalks; however, no side- walk provisions exist along 10th Street in front of the proj- ect site. Current traffic volumes ( 2-way traffic) on the street are estimated at approximately 500 to 1,000 vehicles per weekday. Major access to the MP area is via 7th Avenue to the north of the project site rather than by 10th Street. It is estimated that truck traffic conservatively accounts for approximately 20 percent of this traffic. Lind Avenue is classified by the City of Renton as a second- ar' (principal) arterial . The street north Of Grady Way is a 4-lane section and is approximately 48 feet wide with gravel shoulders and provides primary access into the industrial park area to the north of the project vicinity. Lind Avenue is also the only overcrossing of I-405 providing direct con- nection to the rapidly developing industrial and commercial areas to the south of I-405. The bridge section itself and southerly approach to Grady Way are estimated to be 24 feet wide. Lind Avenue serves as a primary circulation link be ween SW 7th Street to the north and SW Grady Way. Recent Ci y of Renton counts (1980) show Lind Avenue in the vicinity of SW 10th Street as carrying approximately 9 , 700 cars per we kday. South of I-405 the volume increases slightly to 10, 300. Lind Avenue and 10th Street are both posted for 1 07 25-mph speed limits. Lind Avenue crosses a series of rail- f road tracks between 10th Street and Grady Way. These rail-road tracks have been abandoned; however, the railroad streetcrossingsthemselveshavenotbeenremoved . Southwest Grady Way is classified by the City of Renton as a secondary (principal) arterial . It is included in the PSCOG Regional Transportation Network as an analysis arterial and is shown to serve as a primary bypass of I-405 between Inter-urban Ave to the west and Rainier Ave/East Valley Freeway totheeast. It currently carries approximately 15,000 cars per weekday with a peak-hour two-way traffic volume of 1,100 to 1,200 vehicles per hour. The city has no records as to truck traffiic; however, a spot check indicates the truck traffic to he on the order of 5 to 10 percent of the dailytraffic. This reflects the industrial and manufacturinglandusesintheareawhichitserves. Unlike 10th Street SW and Lind Avenue, Grady Way is planned for improvements. Major bridge rennovation to the east is anticipated to occur in 1981-82, which will result in a 5-lane section. This section can be expected to ultimately extend to Rainier Ave- nue. This section would front the project site. The street to the west of Lind Street currently consists of a basic 2-lane narrow section consisting of two 10-foot lanes with gravel shoulders on both sides. To the east of Lind Avenue, the roadway consists of a 5-lane section. There is ample right-of-way (100 feet) for future improvement. A signal was recently installed approximately 1 block west of the project site, primarily for the purpose of accommodating the Boeing office building parking facility located between GradyWayandI-405. There currently are no pedestrian facilities along Grady Way with the exception of the gravel shoulders and pedestrian signals at Grady Way and Lind Avenue. Little bicycle or pedestrian traffic has been observed in this area. This is reflective of the narrow roadway and high percentage of truck traffic on this facility. Grady Way is posted for35mph. The intersection of 10th Street and Lind Avenue is a "T" configuration and is estimated to operate at level of serv- ice "A" under existing conditions. The critical movement e.g. , left-turns off of 10th Street onto Lind Avenue) cur- rently operates at level of service "C" while all other move- ments operate at level of service "A" . The intersection of Lind Avenue and SW Grady Way is a fully actuated 5-phased signalized intersection that is operated by the City of Renton on its computer controlled traffic system. Loop detection is provided on all approaches. The north leg on Lind Avenue for this intersection consists of two lanes; however, no separate left-turn phase is provided . The approach on the south leg of Lind Avenue is also widened to accommodate two lanes to the northbound approach, again I with no separate left-turn lane. GradyWayitselfIP i provides two through lanes for each approach plus a separate left-turn phase for each approach. The intersection is lighted with 400-watt mercury vapor luminaires. There are also provisions for pedestrian-actuated controls as well as WALK, DONT-WALK signalizationJ Calculations for the 4 to 5 p.m. peak hour indicate that this intersection currently operates at a bor- derline leve' of service "C01 and frequently at level of service "B.00 Pedestrian movements are generally light in all of these areas, indicative of the industrial manufacturing nat re of the area. Both local and express transit serviced five routes) exist along Grady Way. The regional transpor tation plan identifies the future need for a bus-only lane along Grady Way. Accident Patterns The intersection of Lind Avenue and Grady Way has a greater number of accidents than the Lind Avenue and 10th Street intersection. The number of accidents is directly related to the traffic volumes encountered. Accidents primarily consist of right-angle collisions or rear-end accidents, which are normally encountered at signalized intersections . The accidents at Lind and 10th Street are generally right- angle, or side-swiping, indicative of a "T"-intersection operation. Discussions with city staff indicate that no accidents have involved fatalities nor have they involved pedestrians or bicyclists. 1Lelvel of service is defined in capacity techniques contain-d in the January 1980 TRB Circular 212. This is an interim update of the traditional Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) . J FUTURE CONDITIONS The location and layout of the proposed development together with an estimated distribution pattern for project-related traffic are shown in Figure 1. All vehicles will gain access to the inspection center via the westerly driveway along 10th Street SW. This access will require use of the inter- section of Grady Way and Lind Avenue. Because of the heavy traffic volumes along Grady Way, the narrow nature of the roadway section, and in anticipation of future widening of this arterial , no provisions have been made or incorporated into the design for access to Grady Way. However, upon com- pletion of the future improvements, "right-turn in" or "right- turn out" maneuvers may be justifiable and will be investigated at that time as a means to expedite traffic through the test center, as well as to improve accessibility to the project site. Two improvements would serve to better distribute the traffic loads from the project site to the arterial network: 1) the provision of a two-way left-turn (as proposed by the City) along Grady Way; (2 ) signalization on Grady Way that would cause platooning of traffic during peak hours in order to allow left-turn maneuvers from the site. However, based on discussions with city staff and the potential future role of Grady Way as a reliever arterial to Interstate 405, it is concluded that access to Grady Way will be severely restricted in order for it to serve as a primary through facility. Discussions with city staff also indicate the potential exists for extending Powell Street west of Thomas through to Grady Way creating a formal intersection. This improvement is predicated upon the proposed development of the area to the northwest of the project site. This development is not expected to significantly impact 10th Street in the vicinity of the project site. Traffic/Circulation On the basis of detailed analysis and simulations provided by VTTI, it has been estimated that the proposed project will service approximately 105 vehicles during the evening peak hour in the peak month. It is also estimated that at least 25 percent of these vehicles will already be traveling in the area for other trip purposes and therefore do not represent a net addition to the traffic volume on the overall road system. However, since much of the property along 10th Street is undeveloped at this time, the additional traffic on this section of the street system would, in fact, repre- sent new traffic. Figure 1 presents the assumed distribu- tion of theIone-way trip ends onto the surrounding street system using the estimated traffic distribution patterns. Adding the assumed site-generated trip to the traffic that already exits on Grady Way and Lind Avenue is not expected to alter the current level of service "B. " This is supported 4 O o a 0 w o N.0 o z a'fd 2 J 20 (20) w 20% 20 10TH ST.SW I 100% 105 100% 105) J STOP-\ 180%85 80) e 85) II.IIIIIIIII 11 ABANDONEDRRCROSSING I J 43 40% SIGNAL d421 A 40%))7 15,200 42 40%) GRADY WAY 43) XX INGRESS PM PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTION t-XX) EGRESS o a 0 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR N 1410 210 0 FIGURE 1 f AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC 1986 PROJECT TRAFFICr 2 WAY TRAFFIC) by PSC9G studies that show Grady Way, I-405, and SW 180th Street as currently operating at a v/c ratio of 0. 95, at 2 .18 in 1990 ig no improvements were made, and at 0.68 in the 1990 plan. 4 The relatively small amount of traffic at this intersection attributable to the project site is less than 5 percent. This figure can be assumed to be included as part of the future growth of the area, and therefore no separate detailed analysis was done to reflect future con- ditions with or without the project. It is estimated that it will take a 42 percent increase in traffic at this inter- section during the p.m. peak hour for the critical approaches to reach level of service "D. " This would represent appro i- mately an 8 .4 percent increase each year for the next 5 years. The intersection of Lind Avenue and 10th Street would continue to1operate at LOS "A" overall; however, the added project traffic would raise the left-turn movement from 10th Street tol Lind Avenue from LOS "C00 to LOS "D. " The peak period traffic volumes shown in Figure 1 are based on 1986 vehicle poi ulations. They therefore represent a somewhat conservative projection. The determination of intersection capacity estimates utilizes the Critical Movement Analysis procedure as defined in the Transportation Research Circular 212 (Trans- portation Research Board 1980 ) . Level of service "C" or " " is generallyconsidered an acceptable level of service for an urban/suburban area as is characteristic of the project site. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed develo ment wiill not, in and of itself, have a significant adverse impact on the operation of the intersection of Lind Avenue and Grady Way or with Lind Avenue and 10th Street SW. All employee and customer parking will be provided on site. The customer parking will be provided at a rate of two spaces per inspection lane for a total of eight spaces. In addition, ore space for each employee will be provided within the project area for a total of 14 spaces. Employee parking will accom- modate both shifts and will provide for handicapped parking spaces. Accident Patterns The additional daily traffic that is generated by the pro- posed vehicle inspection center (one-way trip ends per daY) represents a relatively insignificant addition to the tot 1 traffic volume that currently travels throughout the area and especially at the intersection of Lind Avenue and 10t and at Lind Avenue and Grady Way. As previously presentee , 2Screenline No. 22 as depicted in 1990 Transportation System Plan for the Central Puget Sound Region (Vol . 3) . Septem- ber 30, 1974. 6 Y the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposalamounttolllessthana5percentincreaseoverexistingvolumesafttheintersectionofGradyWayandLind. Therefore,it is not expected that development f thetestinspectioncenterwillhaveasignificantp adverse him aonthenumberofaccidentsontheadjacentimpactThecounterclockwiseoperationforthetestsstationywas .specifically designed to eliminate the majority of potentialconflictsassociatedwiththedrivewayingressandegresspatternsthatwouldotherwisearise. Curb cuts have beenkepttoaminimumtoreducepotentialpedestriantrafficconflicts. I 7 i, r} r REFERENCES Transportatilon Research Board. "Interim Materials on HighwayCapacity. " Transportation Research Circular 212, January1980. 1 1 1 1 1 8 I AFFIDAVIT i Ler9y Bowen being duly sworn, declare that I aim the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of nhy knowledge and belief. Subscribed an sworn before me this c94 day of 1980 , i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 1 d1)1.,„„)._Aciathyl.....14(„Le.) Name of Notaiy Public) Si na ur Owner i`I3G 4n M. /Jr 3o(//y( eq,. Address) Address) 4 LIJt City) State) F2- - 7`1. - Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certyiforegoing application has been inspected by me and has been fo d Qot bid 1 . . ough and complete in every particular and to conform to to i'4e rrare e q,cc ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the (blin Va chv•plication . JAN Z 3 isai Date Received R t_ , 19 By : Renton Planning Dep . . 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I. vY-c being duly sworn, declare th- t I am the owne of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this s. ' -day pf •L/ iop.,,,lc.e.1 , 19 fv , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of N ta 'y Public) Sig atu a of Owner 6.6,0L7J yc 2-7 Y 2 . 7— uddress) h, Address 4delC)•t_ Ø15 City) State) 025 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and' to conform to the rsftkregulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the i y g ki, h application . REC h so' Date Receive 19 By: JAN 13 11181 did Renton Planning Dept . D / 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I, being duly sworn, declare t at I am the owner of the prop rty involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein ' contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this4L day of/tia 19OPC) , 1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, r siding at1 . [ . 7V-1 _1.7 7-//.//_,Zer-1--J G,-- e..: blame of 'ary Public) Signature o ' Owner 7-/ ft /1Y °It 14/Zd t < 6 ' Address) Address) City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE VISE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to c rtify that the foregoing application has been inspected ..by me b.and has been found to h and complete in every particular an to conform to t je rules ` r tr3r3 i ns of the Renton Planning Departmen governing the filin f 1p pp j tion. Date Received 13 1.- 19 By: IIz. ii 141N/NG D v %/ Renton Planning Dept, 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I, 2Le2i Ag. ( n being duly sworn, declare t at I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of ' m' knowledge a d belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of/apirx4 140 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, r siding at_ t"(j9 L.) - 2 iher_j_i7-1 -17 N'ame of T f6ta y Public) Signature o ' Owner r ey,7.,c-// ////rY.ocz--- re, t,2- .,1z..) 4. .,..e/L: A.-7.,.4" Address) Address) City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected y me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular an to conform to t e rules nid rTg•u4lations of the Renton Planning Departmen governing th - fili 's rcAhf rap` ication . Wk_\IB . Date Receive• 19- By: JAB — ._ . --.;' 1 1 I Renton Planning Dept . AFFIDAVIT L 1, j being duly sworn, declare t at I am the caner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of My knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this la day of 19 8 / , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at I b I Laid4-4-C.44.-•• Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) CZAddress) Address) Ce),0,42,4.,/)A144-u,' City) State) 6V7sO Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found tor11orough and complete in every particular and to conform to tlhe ru ,\pnd reeg 1 ,tions of the Renton Planning Department governing the fileng Caf ',lication . 1-4 Date Received 11/4-1 s .01 , Y9 By : eo 4/ , Cam%f1 1NG Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 Ci E sTarE o STATE OFpo. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ASHINGTONCot1x Mail Stop PV-11 206/753-2800 mN-o , ,.. bixy Lee Ray Olympia,Washington 98504 889 11°' aouernor November 4, 1980 j 77(( 1 Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen 1- i Planning Director Cj City of Renton e 64- -200 Mill Aver* S. 16e ' Renton, Washington 98055 t,4;1/ fJ i _ '. ip Dear Mr. Ericksen: In 1977 the federal government mandated through the Clean Air Act that cert in states, including the State of Washington, undertake a program of vehicle emissio inspection to mitigate unacceptable air pollution conditions within their jurisdi - tion. The 1979 Legislature passed a law to implement this program. Starting January 1, 1982, a valid certificate of compliance or a certificat of acceptance issued at an official motor vehicle emission inspection facility wi 1 be required in the State of Washington before the license of any nonexempt vehicle registered in the designated emission contributing areas will be issued or renewed. Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. (VTTI) , a Washington corporation, has been con- tracted by the State of Washington to establish and operate the official motor vehicle emissions inspection facilities under existing statutes (Chapter 70.120 CW, Motor Vehicle Emission Control) and Washington Administrative Code 173-422. These facilities will be located in the Puget Sound and Clark County emission contribu ing areas as mandated by the Federal Clean Air Act. VTTI is required to provide inspection sites in the greater Seattle and Clark County areas of the state. The sites selected should provide the maximum convenience for the vehicle owners in the testing areas. State specifications require that inspection stations be located so that 80 percent of the registered vehicles are housed within five miles of a station and 100 percent of the registered vehicles are housed within 12 miles of a station. We would like to request any assistance you may be able to provide to VTTI in the siting a d construction of these official state motor vehicle emission inspe tion facilities. Thank you-for your assistance in this matter and please do not hesitate to call me if you ha&e any questions. Sincerely, OFFICE OF AIR PROGRAMS OkT1/41(K. Peter W. Hildebrandt Assistant Director PWH:lml cc: John Gunderson, VTTI John R lymond v 3 t. November 18 , 1980 Order No: .44809 DESCRIPTION : TRACT A : That portion of Burlington Northern Railway Company ' s former 120 ' oot wide right-of-way in Government Lot 2 and the fractional Southwes of the Northwest k of Section 19 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W .M, described as follows : Commencing at the intersection of the West line of Lind Avenue , being40feetWest , measured at right angles , from the centerline thereo' ; and the Northerly line of said right-of-way, which intersection is ' approximately 220 feet Northerly, measured at right angles , from the centerline of Grady Way ; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line 400 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence continuing Southwesterly along said Northerly line approxim tely557 . 5 feet ,\ more or less , to the West line of said Section 19'; thence Sou h along said West line of said Section .19 to the Southe lylineofsaidright-o way; thence Nor heasterly lalong said Southerly line of said right-of-wa approximately 557 . 5 feet , more or less , to the most Southwesterly dornerofthatlandconveyedbydeedrecordedunderRecordingNo . 770728-0551 ; thence Northerly along the West line 'of that land conveyed by saiddeeddatedmy12 , 1977 , to the point of beginning; ALSO That portion of Burlington Northern Railway Company ' s former 100 foot wide right-of-way in the Southeast k of the Northeast of Section 4 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , described _as follows..:. Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 24 , _nd the Northerly line of said right-of-way, which intersection is approximately 210 feet Northerly, measured at right angles , from th: centerline of Grady WaV; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line approximately 230 feet , • more or less , to the East line of Thomas Avenue; thence South along sai0 East line of Thomas Avenue to the Southerlylineof. said right-of-way ; thence North asterly along said Southerly line off said right-of-wayapproximately230feetmoreorless , to the East line of said Section 24 ; thence Northerly along said East line of said Section 24 to the poin of beginning ; TRACT B : That portion of the Puget Sound Power & Light Co . right-of-way as conveyed by deed recorded under Recording No . 2629432 lying EasterlyOftheEastl'ne of Thomas Avenue projected Southerly in the Southeast1/4 of the No theast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North , Range 4 E-st , W.M. , and Wes erly of the following described property : continued SECOND REORT j'- Order No . 6L48O:9 DESCRIPTIQN - continued That portion of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company right-of-way formerly the Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way , Renton Branch) in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 19 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.M. , described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of Southwest Grady IWay with the West margin of Lind' Avenue Southwest ; I thence Southwesterly along the North margin of Southwest Grady Way a distance of 395 feet ; thence Northwesterly at right angles to Southwest Grady Way to the Southerly line of the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad right- of-way ; thence Northeasterly. along the Southerly line of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way to the West margin of Lind Avenue Southwest ; thence Southerly along said West margin to the point of beginning ; ALL situate in the County of King , State of Washington . I a li I • I i I T. I 1. M t " i t at s . as P s, i tYjh r 1. PR C)SED ATI ,',+ I_C N i= T APP i41A{ 1, IN M—P _ZONE TO AtLOUDaNSTRUCTIOILOF A 4200 SO. FT, 11;1__VERL LL_ EMISSIONS TESTING FACILITY —.1E4 ' -81 E 1ERAL L COITION A DR ADD:* ESS SOUTHEAST CORNER OF T1E INTERSECTION OF HO +AS AVE, S AND S,6J e 10TH STREET POST, * TO Niel T IY INTERESTED PERSON OF ENVI I THE OF RENTOi,5 N RDI EMTA . ,L4INIFIEW 1 C'•°MMITTEE E®R.C.3 HAS D ETEln MINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACT1 I ODD ES I i I: HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE I PA T,. T N THE ENVIRON- MENT.I A k: ENVIR NM ENTA IMPACT STATEMENT, DWELL 1 ILA aE RE UIRED. AN ,:•:,,PpEAL 00 THE ABOVE DETERMINATIONATION MAY BE FILE' WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXA IN R Ate' 5:13O RIVIL, MARCH 8) 1981 1 FOR FURTHE} I NFCIRMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF REVITON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5-2 E0 I DO NOT REM'.VE THIS NOTICE ITE-1,$ UT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. JAMES E. BANKER (ECF-623-80) Application for special permit, file SP-111-80, to ' construct two-story (65 ' ) office condominium complex which would exceed the maximum 35 foot standard permitted in the L-1 zone; property located in the vicinity of 405 South 7th Street. 2. EDEN ESTATES; (MARK HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA) (ECF-593-80) Application for preliminary plat approval of 11-lot single family subdivision, file PP-079-80; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th Street between KInnewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 3. \VEHICLE _TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. (ECF 00-4-8i) Application for site approval,` file SA-005-81, in M-P zone to allow construction of a 4 , 200 square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one acre site; property located on the southeast corner of the iritersectiori of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ECR) has further issued a declaration of significance for the following project: 1. HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (ECF-013-81) Application for site approval, file SA-010-81, to allow construction of 280 dwelling unit multiple family complex; property located between N.E. 3rd Street and N1E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Avenue N.E. The areas of environmental impact include scale and size of the project, traffic, storm drainage, off-site recreation, and public services. Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by March 8, 1981. Published: February 22, 1981 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-005-81 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-004-81 Description of Proposal: Construction of a 4 , 200 square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one-acre site. Proponent: Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. Location of Proposal: Southeast corner of intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street Lead Agency: City of Renton This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 28, 1981 , following a presentation by David Clemens of the Planning Department.The ERC conducted further review on February 18 , 1981 . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-004-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner DATED: January 22, 1981 2) Applications: SA-005-81 3) Correspondence: a. From CH2M Hill dated February 11 , 1981 b. To CH2M Hill dated February 20, 1981 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . The project mitigates the potential traffic impacts to the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way by providing mitigation in the form of cost participation equal to 3. 5% or a maximum of $3,500. Signatures : 7(4( ' / i/ C r- ect (4 _ R9lh Nelson, Building Director vid R. Clemens , Acting Planning Director A4di /? XJApu4A. 4e61;4, i and C. Houghton, AingPublicWorksDirector DATE OF PUBLICATION : FEBRUARY 22, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: MARCH 8, 1981 PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-005-81 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-004-81 Description of Proposal: Construction of a 4 , 200 square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one acre site Proponent : Vehicle Test Technology, Inc. Location of Proposal: Southeast corner of intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W and S.W. 10th Street Lead Agency: City of Renton This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 28, 1981 , following a presentation by Dave Clemens of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-004-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: January 22 , 1981 2) Applications : SA-005-81 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: 1 . Project adversely impacts traffic . Measures, if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue" a declaration of non-significance. 1 . Provide 5 percent cost of mitigation of necessary traffic improvements to the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way. Signatures : 17/V7- 1/7/ R Nelson But din Diredtor David R. C emens Acting9g Planning Director Richard C. Houghton', Acting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: February 2, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 16„, 1A81 rle,. , T _ T S. ^' F4 n i,'• 's t wAte+ P KT 1 ' f' w I . y 4 W, : A:. ' '., : :P. :1 . ,.. ', . ,- . ': - is Ik ifi f 3 1, j..1' W° , Ti .., 1, 1 ... ,:, , .,,lk 1. 0 si•?' M I SRO -, 0 I® ACTION PROPOSED DECLARA ION OFSIGNIFICANCE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4200 SQUARE FOOT MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS I I TESTING FACILITY ON 1 .ACRE SITE : FILE NO . SA-005-81 GEINIEERA/ LOCATION A:'°,•D DR ADDRESS SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 'INTERSECTION OF THOMAS AVENUE S .W. AND S .W . 10TH STREET I P IIZTE :• TilipI 4 •rToFY I `, TE¢= E TE I '-wERSOc B OF <I N E ='.ta,VIR® : ;'s=,''ENT.'x L ACTION® THE CITYI OF RENTtN ENVIRONMENTAL ,sEVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 7 ,t-y-.'.' S DETERMINED THAT TD-I PROPOSED , .tom [MIN, trit®} .ES ;...I *TOES iklar117, Hitt E A SIGNIFICA •,.T A VERSE IMF-ACT ON THE E %VIR IN!- MENT. t AN ENVIR®NME,-`•- TAL IMPACT STATEMENT, ; '4 9L WILD N9 ,T ,E • Ev,LIIIRED. 1 AN APPEAL OF , THE ABOVE DETEy-:MI ATION M Y E FILED WITH, ` I-IE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., IF'FRRIIARY 16 , 19R1 i FOR ' FLU RTHE''• INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNFQG DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NO - 'E OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETER_ \TION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY INC. (ECF-004-81) Application for rezone, file R-004-81 , of one acre site from G to M-P to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions ; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. 2 . HENRY DAUBERT (ECF-006-81 ) Application for rezone, file R-009-81 , from G to B-1 to allow for potential use as a remodeled office on an approximate 4 ,800 square foot site; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street. 3 . CITY OF 11ENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECF-009-81 ) Application for revision of the. Planned Unit Developme t Ordinanc l. This revision will modify procedures and regulations implementing the PUD Ordinance in compliance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project : 1 . JAMES E. BANKER (ECF-623-80) Application for special permit, file SP-111-80, to construct 5-story (65 ' ) office and condominium complex which would exceed the maximum standard of 35 feet in the L-1 zone; property located at 405 South 7th Street. 2. "VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. (ECF-004-81 ) 1 Application for site proval, ' file SA-005-81 , j in M-P n ap one to allow construction of a 4 , 200 square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one acre site ; property located on the southe.st corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. 3 . MARRIOTT CORPORATION/BOB' S BIG BOY RESTAURANT (ECF-007-81 ) Application or building permit, ile B-246, to construct 5, 600 square foot restaurant with 70 parking spaces ; property located on the northeast corner of Edwards Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washingt n, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by February 16, 1981 . Published: February 2, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 28, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS: JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) BURLINGTON NORTHERN (ECF-523-80, SP-451-79) OLD BUSINESS: ECF-635-80 HARRINGTON PLACE CONDOMINIUMS B-243 STIRSKEY HOLDINGS LTD. ) For consideration of report from Parks and Recreation Director concerning recreation mitigation: application for building permit to construct three-story building containing 35 one and two bedroom condominium units ; property located on the southwest corner of Harrington Place N.E. and N.E. 12th Street. NEW BUSINESS: ECF-004-81 VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY INC. R-004-81 Application for rezone from G to M-P to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions; property located on the south side of S.W. 10th Street between Thomas Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-004-81 VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. SA-005-81 Applications for site approval in V-006-81 M-P zone for a +4200 sq. ft. automobile emissions testing facility and a 15 ' -20 ' variance from the required 60' setbacks on S.W. 10th St. and S.W. Grady Way to permit location of the facility 40 '-45 ' from the property lines ; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street ECF-007-81 BOB' S BIG BOY RESTAURANT B-246 MARRIOTT CORPORATION) Application for building permit to construct 5600 sq. ft. ranch style building with 120 seats and 70-car parking lot; property located on the northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. ECF-006-81 HENRY DAUBERT R-009-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 for potential use as a remodeled office; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street 1 Date circulated : //) zlg, Comments due :4lz 7l$/ EPIVIRO\MENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - err ,, - (9! APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : Vehiet Arst 7ccAnoloj .I C •f PROJECT TITLE : S/re APPROVAL. Brief Description of Project : 60eds$4 444;4 % 16/weed rt LOCATION : sreOrherCote[rtierSreteo e"f l{0r 1ts Ave.sofS //Q&` T SITE AREA : ittete BUILDING AREA (gross ) -± U00#' DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 1,/ 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : /04•.r•40&srh east : elRee south : ackc..A t, /OR orI 7,12.,/e,- R rb ' Lot" west : 4.10 fV /OA• ttLanduseconflicts : Appr1 rekl mot.+ehtrl .ial4r +'d^^]] /hry`e View obstruction : A11,45./401 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : L 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITL ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : _ 18 ) Aesthetics : - 19 ) Recreation :vi 20 ) Archeology/history : l- COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information _ Reviewed by : s`1eLne MU01,$0h 1itle : ASS s Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 112.14 i Comments due :IN/ ! ! ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEt SHEET ECF - 41 T _ APPLICAT. ON No (s ) . ,, , '-0oi -3( PROPONENT : e Ie? ‘Th' elii.oto y rTptC . PROJECT TITLE : 6 ire ThopAlephe, Brief Description of Project : 84voSai. / veor Spite P4.06,1 ARAffoVe.® P LOCATION : r er.0i-i1t4p 5pcbft®tr d)1 TAO"g5 Alp.S `0 4//® ),Cr4, SITE AREA : 44.cve BUILDING AREA (gross ) 17 ((f:1O(514 DEVELOPM NTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Top graphic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wat r & water courses : 4 ) Pla t life : V 5 ) Animal life : s. 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : t/ r 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Hu an health : v 18 ) Ae thetics : 7 19 ) Re reation : v/- 20 ) Arheology/history : s V COMMENTS : Recomme dation : DO. More Information7 Reviewed by : Title :fl/j 4 Date : //L_ /i, / FORM: ERC-06 J 4//41ry Date circulated : J 114.2.11 Comments due : 11.1 ENIVIG ONMEf TAIL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - eMlif - 0 APPLICATION No (s ) . 0413,5'-- r PROPONENT : (1elcle d'ril ire' c 64.00 PROJECT TITLE : fre APPAW.e, Brief Description of Project : r J,A4mIPS® _e P/ tia. 5r ex. '(fcs°old' ()aide ernes 9a ezeiit 4.cith) P LOCATION : c rneU--oi-ia-kesvelietpi ® (i Kas AIR.s eaye i"y. SITE ARE : t fetcv BUILDING AREA (gross ) . 4.74P.00.4 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : , Li/ 5 ) Animal life : r 6 ) Noi e : 7 ) Lig t & glare: 8 ) Lan Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : I 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aethetics : 19 ) Re reation 20 ) Ar heology/history : COMMENT ' : Recommendation : , 5 DOS More Information_ Reviewed Lby : vet 1 itle : C-64° D • SioVt- Date : 3/2/s FORM: ERG-06 h. LI%/41(7 Date circulated : ' 147.1g i Commen' due : 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE J SHEET ECF - .,;pee _gu , 1 1 APPLICATION No (s ) '' .., ne,i9r®-8/ PROPONENT : jkIiieIe 7 cLtotoq te ¢i,C 1 PROJECT TITLE : Tre AppAe i., Brief Description of Project :flep Ss3/ mr„.SPie Pha41 A eev il./Ear az. ?-gaooff, uebete e tos.3i $ '/e Sivtj at'l 1 LOCATION : c earhe 'eider yeka a A .4' C{/ , SITE AREA : fitcye BUILDING AREA (gross) t eto:to O DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ---. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MOR INF' . 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) W ter & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) A imal life :_ v.,' 6) N ise : 7) L ' ght & glarle : 8 ) L nd Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstri+ion : 9) N tural resources : 10 ) R.sk of ups€t : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : taffic impcts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : ' }; 16 ) U ilities : \ 17 ) Himan health : 18 ) A sthetics : 19 ) R- creation : , 20 ) A cheology/history : COMMEN S : 1 I Recommendation : D S DOS More Information Reviewed —by : 4...-....... litle : Lu-4 6'4' . Sr?ec- Date : 4 2A/ 'I FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 1 f 2.2.1g O Comments due :1121 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE1 SHEET E C F - &et - APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : ktele Tert / 'C C . PROJECT TITLE : 17-e Appismmt. Brief Description of Project : .peiAga / '41ecPS ° N r tela o 0eA,cte a si®o. -1 et a a 4c ie1; LOCATION : e r me i! ('i e9e'V''a6 t 4.e A© a 4 `g G°a ® S SITE AREA : tilleteve BUILDING AREA (gross ) ¢' el .®®14 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Toppgraphic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 1 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : er'" 5 ) Animal life : G-s' 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : v' 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : v 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : e 5 1^-T- D (6213 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : eve%-rs e a i'-/ter_ o<, ova;/ab / traffic impacts w 14 ) Public services : 1 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : "'Lei Date : _ /- '- R/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 1z7.-18I Comments due :IN." igt EIWVIRDHHEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIIE,: SHEET E C F - Oetj - v APPLICATION No (s ) . S1 &os - 9f PROPONENT : ()eIi'c?e i/hrt kEXnp1pJ y /NtC - PROJECT TITLE : Sire A 9I//4L I t Brief Description of Project : fl . . m` ArSPle Pi i•i 400/o/d Ito Eor 0_ -ttaoc ' jdic(e emissions -/etehj 'tciliq- LOCATION : c5Ecorner,o'-irtIrrgedieh DI ?ho/K*5 Ate.-SWc:c4//e ' 71 SITE AREA : f' /etcye BUILDING AREA (gross ) ` !' .00 11 DEUELOPME TAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topo raphic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : J 3 ) Wate & water courses : 4) Plan life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Nois : 7) Ligh & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : 1 east : south : west Land use conflicts : View obstructidn : r I 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Popu_ation/EmpJloyment : 12 ) Numbr of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE )) : traffic impact : xx *** 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Enerty : 16 ) Utilties : 17 ) Humai health : 18) Aestietics : 19 ) Recrration : 20 ) Arch ology/history : COMMENTS : "*"* see comments on Development application review shee Recommend tion :DNSI , DOS More Information xxx Reviewed by /• t1e : T Date : 1,27/80 FORM: ERC- c6 Date circulated : 112-7-egl Comments due : lJ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEI SHEET E C F - atPie - APPLICATION No (s ) o , -®, PROPONENT : iRG1 ' •E' d./L.0/0IY PROJECT TITLE : 6frIF itirIXWOPAY, Brief Description of Project :54 ve r fefa®®* 0eAdc(' et/vris-5, 4A P LOCATION : orier•Chireleer5e 4i4I 4 - t i®A s 9•• "gvea/' Lc33. SITE AREA : tifiteve BUILDING AREA (gross ) ''' eirc)L®oq' DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : e 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : i/ 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Arheology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI )' DOS More Information Reviewed by : Tg,,,, 1 itle : /iFic G yC iv Date : / 0/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 1121-1g s Comments due :1111 i g i EIFi1UIRmNNE[ T1L CHECKLIST REUEU SHEET E C F - otp - gr APPLICATION No (s ) . Oj PROPONENT : e rC ke a c . PROJECT TITLE :fie ipipmW WI Brief Description of Project : ,,aS % IvI0rSile P611 Ap ,0 GP06/ COr la oe:Cct> 0ekke & ea/ndss/00 S ' s'tilvty ta.ci6'1-- LOCATION :corner eye¢vt4por peli®w m't -rite)"i.s Abe•- sae/ ® 74. SITE ARE I : /CCV BUILDING AREA (gross ) ± B O O DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Top graphic changes : I 2 ) DirLt/Indirect air quality : 3) Wat r & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : 7-7 ,,z View obstruction : p----' -, 9 ) Natural resources : x 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : I01_traffic impacts : Cy Yc 1taul 14) Public services : 1 X 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Arheology/history : COMMENTS : r/emsD flp i--i -4,-.4-6_ dzfg FF/L / / 74 CT 0- 1 Z___/rt) / qaAD c7 s L Recommendation : SI_ DOS More Information, Reviewed by : Title :z,y u Date : Z6 -r FORM: ERC-06 i, Date circulated : I/Mtg, r Comments due :air? tat il. ,„ ENVIROIN IElNTAL CHECKLIST REVIEtr SHEET y; E C F - oat - t APPLICATION No (s ) . „ •-®o5'-9r PROPONENT : 1kII'Clc! 7:1,511 kcacaol®je/tc . I PROJECT TITLE : E I Brief Des ription of Project : a 40f-. ' . (2 r/ yo 6or dm_ _?ao ueA1dde ev isse on.s • iete in •2cite'/- LOCATION : t- cororwwei 4pft54P 'T fO h a4-eTAOAts Abe•-s.0 eat,oxd . SITE AREA : t /itCy ! BUILDING AREA (grols) _ DEVELOPME TAL COVER GE (o) : 1 --.. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topo raphic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indireci air quality : 3) WateT & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Anim l life : I/ I 6) Nois : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south: west Land use conflicts : I View obstruction : v/' I 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Emplloyment : 12 ) Numb r of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 1 traf is impacts : 14) Publ ' c services : i{, r 15) Ener y : T • 16 ) Util ' ties: 1/ 4 . 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : . . yr-' 19) Recreation : v 20 ) Archeology/history : 1. 1 COMMENTS : 1 4 Recommendation : 11.3 DO.. More Information_ 1 Reviewed by : at iry .M Title : 14 1/C 1 Date : 2-2 J 1' FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : M.77.fg/ Comments due : //2 7l8/ ENVIIRD (MENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - OOV - V APPLICATION No (s ) . A - QOS-S/ PROPONENT : Vehicle /41"S1-- /-cAnO/0j / 4f1C • PROJECT TITLE : Sire APPROV`flL Brief Description of Project : l oeOs 4+4`T,/ 44, Apieroltal r, t 41?00 4 U eAI-e 1e e 1 u..r s frr11•w'''3 !cic'/y LOCATION : J6-LOrneKof1.N seehoy ec Tictsys note•SW :ego/6' 47.1 SITE AREA : 14'Cpe BUILDING AREA (gross) -± g0'1004 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE i INFO iil1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : v I 4) Plan life : i 5 ) Anim_ 1 life : 6) Nois : 1. ,._. w- 7) Ligh & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : 4/Q4.4plrotoSiemy east : en deseelpe d` south : u4 eels.h / //Re a 47.1„ /eri 4',r./ LOt west : QV P Alp r Land use conflicts : 4pprrjoriVIAL Sl a...luD a/ . EUTAIr,r ' /1i' e View obstructic n : s;t'1 9) Natu al resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Popu ation/Employment : 12 ) Numb r of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traf is impact : 14 ) Publ c services : 15 ) Ener y : v 16 ) Utilities : L/- 17 ) Huma health : 18 ) Aest etics : r 19 ) Recr ation : l/ 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : Sieve 111 U K S 0" Title : AS S f S1o..4,÷'iiuute t••. Date : ! I2Z/gJ FORM: ERC-06 CH2M CHILL engineers planners economists scientists 13 January 1981 S14256.A7 r! o R-.,-.IR JAN..........4 1981 LMr. Dave Clemins 4/ Acting Planning Direlctor 9 City of (Renton fN`G DES Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Dave: Thanks for taking the time to talk with us about the rezone, variance, and site plan review for the State Motor Vehicle Testing Program. Enclosed please find filing fee in the amount of $345.00 and a narrative justification for the requested variance. We will check back with you next Tuesday if we have not heard from you first on the reaction of the Hearing Examiner and planning staff on the appliance. Thanks again and see you Friday on the Quendall project. JSincely, Jo E. Anthony jd Enclosure I I II Seattle Office 1500 114th,,,venue S.E., Bellevue,Washington 98004 206/453-5000 CH2M 11 HILL MEMORANDUM 1,, 0 i. r.. 0 1i 1 TO: City of Renton. I,0+ ? F- 7 FROM John Anthor4g/ S Planner CH2M HILL if,',,-. r.p.,,/ DATE: 12 January 1 1 lease revie the attached applications for a rezone, variance and site plan approval. The proposed project is a State of Washington Vehicle fission Tesk Facility at SW 10th Street and Thomas Avenue. The acility will .be operated by Vehicle Test Technology Incorporated, under contract to the Washington State Department of Ecology. This facility, mandated by the federal government, will test carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions of passenger vehicles in the Southcenter area to help bring the Puget Sound region into attain- ment for federal pollutant levels. The project must be in operation by January 2, 1982; therefore, time is a critical factor in the processing of land use applications. in the interest of expediting our application, we request you reviewtherezone, variance and site plan approval together and that approyal Of the variance be conditioned on the final approval of the rezone by the City Council. We feel the rezone request is appropriate at this time to support the emerging manufacturing park character of the area. The variance is Iliecessary because of the narrow configuration of the site and its frontage betFreen two streets. Required setbacks in the MP zone in this circumstance are 60 feet from each street. This removes 120 feet If the 160 foot lot depth from the site's buildable area. SimilarOf and variances have been granted along this strip of land between Grady Way and SW 10th Street in the recent past. In our design of the facility, we have made every effort through landscaping and selection of building materials to enhance the character of the area. If you have any questions or require more information please call me at 453-5000. I jI CITY, OF RENTON QIF RE./V/ APPLICATION A a C N -1 ° v SITE APPROVAL JAB 13 1981 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 15 -• -""' hw File No . SA- DOS-// Fi1in9-fiitt o Application Fee $ Receipt . Environmental Review Fe $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE IIIEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name vP1„c1e Test Technology, Inc. Phone (714) 956- 450 Address 421 East Cekritos Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805 2 . Property location SE corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue OW and SW 10th Street 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Sea attached to rezone AP . ) I 4. Number of acres or (square feet 1 AC. Present zoning G 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Vehicle Emissin Testing Facil ' ty 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale exis ing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' o 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appel led Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. II s__—_, CITY OF RENTON i °Q/ V APPLICATION 1 SITE APPROVAL U JPN U FOR OFFICE USE ONLY N. E, 6 Filele No. SA- %G -,P/ Filing D Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name vehicle Test Technology, Inc . Phone (714) 956-5450 Address 421 East CeYritos Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805 2 . Property location SE corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue SW and SW 1 IQth Street 3. Legal desdription (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached to rezone AP . ) i Number of acres or square feet 1 AC. Present zoning G 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Vehicle Emissio i Testing Facility 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this applicatio : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking , lands aping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (iinclude land use and zoning on adjacent parlcels) 1" = 200 ' o 800 ' D. Building heights and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Apprdved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. i OF R LI t$ 0 Z VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON o9' Oo ..a Q PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4.0 SEP1 . 206) 235-2550 NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on rJ back of this form Application No. : /- 00 e 4/ carefully before Associated File(s) : preparing your appli- Date cation for VARIANCE. Received: Date Accepted: Approved: Denied: DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Ca prehensive Plan Zoning: h IL 1 In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any Other pertinent information Which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note Variance Application Procedure on the last page) . LName of App icant: Vehicle Test Technology, Inc . 2. Mailing eess: 421 East Cerritos Avenue Anahei , California 92805 Telephone No. : (714) 956-5450 3. APPLICANT II : l Oianer Lessee Ei Contract Purchaser t] Other (Specify) 4. Name and' a l ss of owner, if other than applicant:dre Telephone No.: 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) : SSE Corner of the Intersection of Thomas Avenue SW and SW 10th Street 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : (See Attached) 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: (See Attach ed)-r- 1- f 1 r 8. Why can't the property be . veloped within the requirements or the ordinance? See Attached) AFFIDAVIT I, be sworn, declare that I .amthe owner of the property invol in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature o Owner y,66 - /0 6 (V Address quo City, State, Zip Code Number) Telephone No. 36 Y 5 6 Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 198/, Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, residing at , aee ( ame of Notary Pu is J fie zil (6a6tet_ d4A.,t, Address • J 9f 13- 2- OF R i. 0 ty © °, VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON 0 94o P PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 ED SEP'r 206) 235-2550 NOTE: TO APPFT,ICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on rJ back o this form Application No. : carefully before Associated File(s) : preparing your appli- cation for VARIANCE. Date Received. Date Accepted: Approved: 0 Denied:Q DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Comprehensive Plan Zoning: In addition to t1e information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the app ication (no a Variance Application Procedure on the last page) . 1. Name of Applicant: Vehicle Test Technology, Inc . Mailing Addpeess: 421 East Cerritos Avenue Anaheim, California 92805 l hone No.: (714) 956-5450Anaei, Te ep 1 3. APPLICANT IS: Ei Owner C1 Lessee Li ntract Purchaser in Other (Specify) 74. Name and a l ss of owner, if other than applicant:dre Telephone No.: 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersction) : SE Corner of the Intersection of Thomas Avenue SW and SW 10th Street 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : (See Attached) 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: (See Attached) I 1- 8. ' Why can't the property be 47eloped within the reguirementb of the ordinance? See Attached) AFFIDAVIT I, A7 1 being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knualedge and belief. Signature o Owner Address cd2',.003 City, State, and Zip ('rr3e Number) Telephone No. 2' d ` Subscribed and swo before me this day of 191E2, Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, residing at d77la A%e-64-7-_-) Name of Nota/XPublic S7 /Y aC Addr Zda 2_ 1 F . OF R4, 44 et ty © ° VARIANCE APPLICATION 10.1 0 CITY OF RENTON 0 P o PLANNING DEPARTMENT fp SEP'E 206) 235-2550 r NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on back of this form Application No. : carefully before Associated File(s) : preparing your appli- I cation for VARIANCE. Date Received. i Date Accepted: Approved: Denied:Q DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Camprehensive Plan Zoning: In 'addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and amotherpertinentinformationrichwillassistinthereviewofthisapplication. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note Variance Application Procedure on the last page) . 1. Name of Applicant: Vehicle Test Technology, Inc . 2. Mailing Addreess: 421 East Cerritos Avenue Anaheim, California 92805 Telephone No. : (714) 956-545C 3. APPLICANT IS: Ei owner C1 Lessee fa Contract Purchaser Ll Other (Specify) 4. Name and a' . -ss of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone No. : - 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) : SE Corner of the Intersection of Thomas Avenue SW._ and SW 10th Street I I i I 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : (See Attached) 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: (See" Attached) 1- t 8. Why can't the property be loped within the requirement. .,f the ordinance? See Attached) AFFIDAVIT I,being duly sworn, declare that Iam thr7owner G of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith. submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 67) - Z//-/('-' Signa e 16Wner 7 Addres Ve/tY61X Z6la City, State, and Zip CrAP Number) Telephone No. Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 y. c day of,crilif.197 &, Notary Public in and forlithe State of Washington, residing atge ` are of Notary-Public ' Address, • GUI 70 3 2- i 4-- , -.i i- OF R A A. 40 © z VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON 94 P PLANNING DEPARTMENT04g74•0 sEP-E•' 206) 235-2550 ii- NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on H back of this form Application No. : carefully before Associated File(s) : preparing your appli- cation for VARIANCEl . Date Received: Date Accepted: 1 Approved: Denied:Q DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Comprehensive Plan Zoning: 1+ t In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (no a Variance Application Procedure on the last page) . 1. Name of Applicant: Vehicle Test Technology, Inc . 2. Mailing Addreess: 421 East Cerritos Avenue Anaheim, California 92805 Telephone No.: (714) 956-5450 3. APPLICANT IS: i airier E[ Lessee la Contract Purchaser Other (Specify) 4. Name and a ss of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone No.: 5. General location of proposed project (give street Address if any or nearest street and inter tion) : SE Corner of the Intersection of Thomas Avenue W and S , 10th Street 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : (See Attached) t.S: 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: (See Attached , Reduce front yard setback requirement in MP zone from60 `~fet to 40 feet. Sec, 4-730, 030 (2). of City of Renton Zoning Code. 1- ti 23 8. Why can't the property _. veloped within the requirement.rement. .,f the ordinance? See Attached) AFFIDAVIT I, Leroy IA. Bower being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner oflthe property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signatur of er 301 Lloyd Bldg. Address I Seattle, Washington City, State, and Zip Code Number) Telephone No. 682-1433 1 Subscribed and swornntbefore me this c "7 day of A 'ix^- L, 19,R5, Notary Public in and for, the State of Washington, residing at ';) UQ,,,. J. Name of Notary Pu lic 3V 36, c?oti. ('t (. k'} E- - Address ' • I t ,(0!4›...„J1 i I 2- ATTACHME vi . 8 . Why can 't the property be developed within the requirements of the odinance? a) The rear of the property (Grady Way) is encumbered with a 60 foot power line easement which prohibits any building construction underneath it. b) There is a 20 foot petroleum easement through the easterly porltion of the property which prohibits building con truction over it. c) Further, as result of the widening of 10th Street, the 10 h Street'r'ght-of-way jogs 10 feet south abutting 11 th' s property which makes the property narrower than the adjoining lands to the east {The Wells/Bain property to th east was granted a setback variance in SA-061-77} . Th easements and narrow configuration constrain the property from being developed as intended by the zoning classification. I l JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE A. The v riance is necessary because of the narrow configuration of the site and 'ts frontage between two streets. The required setbacks in the proposed zone in this circumstance are 60 feet from each street. This removes 20 feet of the 160 foot lot depth from the site's buildable area, leaving only a 40 foot wide strip of land which can be used for structures. Other prdperties in the MP zone are generally of a shape that allows the spacious setbacks which are intended in this zone without restricting building size. Property to the east which is similarly constrained between Grady Way and SW 10th Street has been granted a variance to allow construction of an office building. B. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare because: 1. Substantial 40 to 45 foot setbacks will be maintained 2. Large interior and perimeter areas of the site will be landscaped. The building will be low and small. These measures will help achieve the objectives of the required setbacks in less space. 3. Unless the Setbacks are slightly reduced it is extremely difficult to provide a functional design on a site of this depth. 4. The extra landscaping will help assure compatibility with adjacent uses in ad ition to providing open space and wildlife habitat. C. The approval of this variance will be consistent with other variances granted on similar property to the east. D. The building has been designed to optimize its internal functional characteristics and has been placed on the site in a manner to minimize the amount of setback reduction. ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. U 47 - Pi Environmental Checklist No. .L--(?i (-SU-/ =}'/ V- C'! a PROPOSED, date:FINAL. date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is suci a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or wher you believe an explanation mould be helpful to government decision makers , include yo r explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rel - vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answer should include 'the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,) even though combletion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, wi b- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various qpes of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to he next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Vehicle Test Technology, ,.car a &ed 2. Addr?ss and phone number of Proponent: 421 East Cerritos Avenue Anaheim, California 92805 I 714) 956-5450 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size general design elements . and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : SEE APPENDIX A 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the; land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other informatiq'n needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : SEE APPENDIX A 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : The facility will be operational January 2 , 1982 . 9. List of all permits!, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and! local--including rezones) : Rezone, Variances, Building Permit, Site Plan Approval , Clearing and Grading Permit, and other Utility Permits, State of Washington Flood Control Zone Permit, Deferral of Grady Way Improvements 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: NO 11. Do you know of anylplans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If! yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Variance Application Site Approval Application Rezone Application II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the !proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of !the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? j MAYBE NU— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in !siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ;ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES mATETi Explanation: I SEE APPENDIX A 3 2) Air. Will the propolal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE .NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES M NO r • c) Alteration of air movement; moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally pr •. _. . ._ . regxonally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE APPENDIX A 3) Water. till the proposal result in: a) Charges in currehts, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) 'Charges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO - , c) Alt rations to the course or flow of flood waters? X— YES MAYBE NO d) Charge in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any .alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?X YES MAE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the. quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE N.O h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through dire is injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, dete gents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES M NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for lublic water supplies? X YES MAYBE W Explanatin: SEE ,PPENDIX A 4) Flora. W 11 the proposal result in: a) Chan e in the diversity of species, or numbers of any spec es of flora (including trees. shrubs, grass, crops , micr flora and aquatic plants)? X_ Y S M YBE b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to t e normal replenishment of existing species? YES MA—BE NO d) Reduction in acre. ge of any agricultural crop? X YES. MAYBE- NO Explanatio : SEE APPENDIX A ' 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)?X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?I X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MATTE NO Explanation: SEE APPENDIX A 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? T,1-- Whiff 3 Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?X— VET- RATTY NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increasi in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES WIFE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or, the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? PEES MA BE NO Explanation SEE APPENDIX A I 11) Population.! Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?j YES RATICN Explanation: i 4- ; c ~ , 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NI) e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yam- MAYBE 6 f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES NXTETE Explanation: SEE APPENDIX A 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : I a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES M-A-7TE NO c) Schools? X- YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE N ? f) Other governmental services? YES RAMIE N Explanation: I 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YET- MAYBE FIT— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? XI YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? 7E7 MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAY E NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will he proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: I 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YBS MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful ,1 ck ,.of full disclosure, on my part. Proponent:i- ':• , (4 . signed) John Anthony name printed) For Vehicle Test Technology, Inc . City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 y AFFIDAVIT II , Leioy Bowen being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the proiperty involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this (94 day of pa . A ) , 1980 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at( i)-1.-v.J (6 ;tom J Name of Notary Public) Si na ur Owner) Ad 9136, QQt 1 . Or 30(//A : e4 . dress Addres c j .. Gam, City) State) z - lcii Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that t e ffo„.regoing application has been inspected by me and has been' found to tf.ii i-rt h and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules lr e 6111, 'ons of the Renton Planning Department governing the fili 9g of((' z4,a p, ation . V Date Received 13 ,cal , , a By : r-- s......... v 94 C Renton Planning Dept . y 2-73 I .r AFFIDAVIT I, c C{ Ll-(being duly sworn, declare that I am the own of the property involved in this application and that th- foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best o my knowledge and belief Subscribed and sworn before me this P.' day of 0.4-n.,4/ , 19 fe, , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at /, ti -- - ci41 `..lja 0,140-2.) Name of N to y Public) Sig atu a of Owner Q6- 2• 7 7:5-Y /./7d - Address). wtf Address) 9.47(),e City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that .e—fo.regoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to j< to o1'o4 and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules -r>d^r`e uia 'pz of the Renton Planning Department governing the filin o s i-c . pplicktion . a\: Date Received 197e r By: issY n4, 6 Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 AFFIDAVIT Le1/4/ii Ag-a44Aorily_.2 being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that th-i foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best o my knowledge and beliefL Subscribed and sworn before me this V day of 19,&) , Notary Public in and for the State of I Washington, residing at .-Y.:192( . i Y7 Warne of .tary Public) Signature of Owner) 7071/ /x7it,,Q--A, ..,,,c- ..,, - ,gc„,,,o- Address) Address) 2jk/) City) State) Telephone) I FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that -.the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found , o ie ' drough and complete. in every particular and to conform to the ru, es a reg(ts1;a%tions of the Renton Planning Department governing the fil'fing rot s„JrJ2 ap lication . Date Received ,JAN 13 1981 , 19 By: tv f Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 i . AFFIDAVIT L. I being duly sworn, declare that I lam the caner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best o€ my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this i a day of9r.„.A.‘84..n. , 19 8 1 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner 4.36 a) }&atl.P2 c?f4...C¢ G;‘) — /ad a C A/ Address) Address) 6.1&:-(..4147 et)0,<;/ ' I City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify th t One fTRr e;g oing application has been inspected by me and has been found Abe t 'if o1'i 'j and complete in every particular and to conform to the rul s, an mgU6attols of the Renton Planning Department governing the fil 'l g of such applf c tion . JAN 13 1,937 Date Received r -p--------------------, Fly By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 Receipt # i CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME \a)11.17.; t.k.,) A C.):14-ni)i';.° ? ( h i DATE /7„i ..-3/ 1 1 - AA40:t'''' .. PROJECT & LOCATION S;t : C we,-;/...-o -1 1147,:,,,,,,,,,,, 1590(-1, S.ta i/S:,0.), / 21,/:- i L,/e ,c.1'.7,, i-7-f- r ...6cA) 72.-?s,I;tv-,- F.,.if.'.1-,- , r Application Type , Basic Fee Acreage),Fee Total 24. 2.., C ',.:A.,,)C. I or i 1/ (.=-' Tri , difrOV.,4;', Z-1, AF/ 190 0 v. 2 _T .:1) V at:3.1-h-A.T1-7;4..--. ';,s— _0 4* .,:7-1-• 1 Environmental Checklist ' ,,'• ,--' , Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee 1/22 Cp C ) TOTAL FEES k -''''/:; r ' 1 -' .77, I Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. ; raM FILE FILE TITLE s 1' 414. G.. fi rt0