Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-015BEGINNINU OF FILE MICROFILMED FILE TITLE I Applicant DR. DAVID WOODCOCK File No. R-015-81 Project Name SAME Property Location 123 Pelly Avenue N. HEARING EXAMINER: Date 4-3-81 Recommendation Approval with conditions Req./Rec. Date Received 4-17-8lDate Response 4-28-81 Appeal - Date Received Conditions modified Council Approval - Date Ordinance/ 3 55 ! Date (/A g i Mylar to rYCountyforRecording Mylar Recording # Remarks: See File No. SP-016-81 for exhibits 3haI-t-1 Nk t r'-' - '. 1. tr:-."......• ... 0 ti-.>, .1 Xf 91'cr i.0. Gym7.6 N. '1 i.)- -' \;:- 0 NI 7.,'"a- s,, ffi v.'," f)t°61'4:: °..C- c / S 6°'el tea. ^ '`' • b0D Qf'Q.: Of 7 a" v r ii. / c / •', 1 / sif 1 64../34 I: ,0 i i.',.. • '. ' 4, k ` 1 ,N %, to ai .._ 4._ ___-... ,r.-_ 61,7 t' --- - 1 evt... .......t/e 0 $-1 - . : b ,.., 91 \< P\ L.! W a 50 zoo At , '• ip, o , i Y •/ n e_ s -6 L L L t I p, n£ 1 : g•4.ov I ,r oa cat'et W. - . . o e.- . y Dr, or '.' Z h\-". . t c lb. Sao 1 9 4 , o = / 9 2. 5, E. Z 5'.,'t" S40: 5.4 Y. z w si i0 sr z 09. s z {`, ' i• t twos SOO F2 , ., ' -• '; r"' .. *.. :, 1,09% . , 's": b-.Y- . sbvt t zi-z---- L aV .• It 9 - GIB 1 iibS' 12 ', 4. 9 y„, s,.;. Ct/? a o. .2 • c J I p2' 4., - t 4 ii.vv i"oz o - . . Z a ' oo•a I !2 ; O i: f si j i , I n-- --- j 1 i , \ S r. - I---- __ .._ -- 1 r t I 1_I. i t o\--:.• , j y dd3a JN4/ I ti, Awl,/xlawo.ao Y 0- 17 _, Mind?pr11cIeG! 9Sr OH gNLL4170 - - 1Yo1r1321 i861 61 83 f Q r 4/a cy a , r ' 1— \, L tO N •9AV A 1-18d fo Sri10 id VV7!'1d Z.No1N321'iZ , i 1. os or os of d s 0 1no gain,M3a N'— v. N 17- 7 Y w9IMo.bFr11WY3?Jo1 - 1' S.t a1o•t 9 v E oi r zlo li dS NIl<I X3 rq rlr" Q `` 2n' f. b gr advxc+nvi 0r z a: Mean uron ddW A1INIVInr 9 r_sSnoH lclxe—r A ii(III III` I d u,b c r - N 3nv rrt ds oZ s• 9 _ 3,„L.,g' i 9 i 2-11'.11v1G 4nIJ. IX_ ,::, re% b X N g 1 17 r4I-AiliD old 03 C 0off Y 9rll l'vd U3SQ 021d Qy J I yfI_---i r" =5'1N1.S bi- grlriadd-bso • I 1 3'8Oo9'E *aao rvtot it71o16 3N0 3ax+on e S9NIQ-11ng 71NI'17 G)N115IX3-- f 4xu f6 It 1 nay,sas.armc katermsro Iwo ewM er revaarrnon lmne $Q11 4 y I I M'TnW'177IA GIN,,Z I 111!•r'C'l h93M L 1 lE O 31+a1G•`/' ,Fioe I•+oa]I•IN71 7piA w dl aevlT.•7O,4 1d C gcivo PaG r1oJNapJ do ek-u rJ,-1arJ9• VPe'bl'1.10F7 d2"1a21R<l . Wel ¢Jdli121C1 V4doyg Te91oo?J 3i`o9v.%.Cd 1 n I'KJzi,L-,,,,wni.„,,,SnMr20 cpII C\\\\NreatoegA\\61\8'rN 3110 lvaren8 )1 Airrry c/H1181X J -c;zrr 0NId'DSdN'd1 as - it 1; se ANpSGAPIHC, 62:1rxiSTWbALLAYrse,UJUCTOITIE NUJ6StTf_1-91 APRuuu9AUTITeALLS•2yq:CJ.1.Jy11R isIa1 tATG'A6oJERAdi01J.I.. 57cR1+D?JJNK FT1Lill crreorRourc..1Ii;4, aocchfr..cow uVia. . Hopp6.ILCOr 90'-30' ...Tow. w 1 d1 BCiMIG61JFLrMtfIM12AERA1UILf119IIi11 t•PLGUTIIJACGAe0141v/1A1WNWNUk"/IR-1SP+7LpA,S. GIII.TINc•si lL F—•Ex13T1NCycLiNlctbUILDINGSaI i 1NoW.G ONGSTORY-TOTALACa9,5009.E 4.PAYiaNb-19STAUS_ 11I F'ROFbSeDVORKINb• 1 nC.Poe@[ISTINC,G1..1NIGI di itini -) .,,_ OISx15T11abSTA V4/ 2 el5 III1 = ToGil1r----' ' 11 + Pats•"Na• N. e, 24' I* 20I ; G c• 9'TyP. oilll!I,, 1- FT.HOURI VICINITYMAPNoeTH warYsaacs 1t ,,/,, r l1W?V^APMify AQCEX1TINlySPRUCE L0T2LOT3A• BlOT4a' IllrTOKpiVINI- I401HIbH awayTf A. POwRtF rf / a-*`-- AIl4Y__ . li. / 1 i NSWciUT.aC ' i O410Zo5040COj i yll%) gA kDIXZt,REPTON i laaMRATus3. PELLYAVE. N. 0 I I cubeQcur.Cbcur iyir i i I 1 I 1 I ReNTON0(ISTINdHouse10)(151114b("UPLINKa OPT0ANTR4CLAW. S 451 OF R 4111 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o mom BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 9, 0 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250C 09gr4D SEP1° 3 June 22, 1981 David G. Woodcock, Jr., DDS 115 Pelly Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 RE: City of Renton - Rezone 015-81 - Ordinance No. 3551 Dear Dr. Woodcock: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of June 8, 1981, has adopted Ordinance No. 3551 to rezone your property from Residence District (R-2) to Residence District (R-3) . A copy of the above-referenced Ordinance is enclosed. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:db ENC: 1 pF R ti y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U `0 © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 omiWIMP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 235- 2550 0, 9l1-E0 SEP1eg' 4' MEMORANDUM June 1 , 1981 TO : Del Mead , City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE : WOODCOCK REZONE ORDINANCE The proposed ordinance for the Woodcock rezone has been reviewed and is considered accurate . Attached is a map of the area to be attached. wr Attachment t INTER-OFFICE MEMORAN RENt L''' TO : Planning Department 1 c 1 DATE : 6/1/81 c 1 lg6 t- FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk VN J, RE : Ordinances G Rezone Ordinance Woodcock R-015-81 4NN1 O% QQQ-NG_ We attach $, .Utt44-,*-4c.)_?w1/,-.c Ordinance (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee . DB OF R4, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON U POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 np LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 90 co' SUSAN R. IRWIN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0g7-4E0 SEPcEktZ May 29, 1981 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Re: Rezone Ordinance - Woodcock R-015-81 Dear Del: Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as above captioned. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee Mayor Council President Planning Dept. CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANG- ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT R-2 ) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT ( R-3 ) . WOODCOCK R-015-81 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District ( R-2 ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about February 19, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 24 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated April 3, 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . Page 1 W • Said property being located at 123 Pelly Avenue North , Renton , Washington . ) SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of June , 1981 . Delores A. Mead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of June , 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J . Warren , City Attorney Date of Publication : Page 2 1 CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 3551 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANG- ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT R-2 ) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT ( R-3 ) . WOODCOCK R-015-81 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV ( Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District ( R-2 ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about February 19, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 24 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COIJNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District ( R-3) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated April ' , 19P1 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : Lot 4 , Block 24, Renton Farm Plat No . 3 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Volume II of plats , page 70 , records of King County , Washington . Said property being located at 123 Pelly Avenue North , Renton , Washington . ) SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 8th day of June , 1981 . 1 L et<y! 4- - Delores A. Mead , tyCi <Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 8th day of June , 1981 . 3(1.4044) Cts Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J . Wa'Fren , City Attorney Date of Publication : June 12, 1981 Page 2 A l' ,;.I tli 1 Val-1E ! 7--- I 1JIJ a IFoVNDRVCO t , 4ele. 4 _._ ,__ _ . i, ik I --_ -- --,, , , . -.: .g -4 irliat_ 1 . , ,..• I R-4 4.•,' R---- 4 - . hQ f0,- - _-:,, ''- 'i ese a•—,: th • .g ks 4\11,' rc a'' !Fr r U \ ---\ 7- 4 • / 8 _1 Mr 41/ s L-` I r.n. t 1 + S . 1 : 2 `Irvlo / , \ AIR.. sia I 1 r.tii a t1F 1:# I• ` - - 1 4,44 _Aid - - ...;.ri Pit La) 7:t i LOP Re_ii __ .: ,...-J- 1 ' t- , , N., ...,/, isiirz _ , 1,. . irV1 I j cie£arrp—ii f' •' '''" B ' V7 R 2,'SfN OR JVN/OR II Ala M _[. 1 . V ... , r IM16MuuCC IIz r 44, 0 a_ -g4 — 04 ' -' 2141'7 11 k---2' N _____ Y\ ' "' pc r f/i 4 RIPIOn ' 1" N' 1. 6 _ 1.,• y> Irul.l,ul. O E tO - ram-- rT•F . a' ; 1 , _ .. ; I, . 11 E - -j4 1 L 41. -''''' t, f"--=',A411t--a'> 1- P d a-4 2,, ..-F.--"_ -. ,-: -!- NN, M_ 4 I i • ' . ,,'. J , i Hi i- .•...•I 2 ji , r• ! ' ., 'YxH ono 1 car p - . _ ! ;, t E7 f z if. - . 4‘;‘ r.-.2_,.. i its p-1AL..- E' T .-I-- - i• ii - . ' 10 - .I .' , 1,•___ _ . r- . 1 J _ ,. .gip .s \ APPLICANT DAVID G . WOODCOCK , JR . TOTAL AREA +5 ,000 sq . ft . PR ' NCIPAL ACCESS Via Telly Avenue North EX STING ZONING R-2, Resdience two family ; min . lot size 7 , 200 sq . ft . EX STING USE Single Family Dwellings PROPOSED USE Rezone to R-3 ; Special Permit for parking lot COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family COMMENTS Renton City Council 6/8/81 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Request for Letter from Nick Kuntz, 301 NW 6th St. , reported recent request Street Sign for caution sign installation at NW 6th St. because of lack of NW 6th St. sidewalks and children/adults must use side of street. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, refer request to the Transportation Committee. Stredicke asked all streets without sidewalks be reviewed. Mayor Shinpoch recalled prior requests and advising Mr. Kuntz that "children at play" sign for the Woody Glenn cul-de- sac area could have more dangerous repercussions rather than pro- tecting the children, as advised by Traffic Engineer Gary Norris. ROLL CALL: 2-AYE: STREDICKE, CLYMER; 4-NO: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, TRIMM AND REED. FAILED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CORRESPONDENCE BE ADDRESSED TO MR. KUNTZ REITERATING PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION. MOTION CARRIED. Appropriation Letter from Parks and Recreation Director John Webley requested Appraisal/Park appropriation of $5,000 from Park Fund excess revenue to profes- sional services for appraisal to determine the value of Maplewood Golf Course and set the stage for potential negotiations. Person present: Larry Vickers, 13419 SE 141st St. , urged King County buy the golf course property, being adjacent to County park, so that maintenance costs could be reduced. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND STREDICKE, AUTHORIZE PARK DIRECTOR TO PROCEED WITH APPRAISAL ON GOLF PROPERTY. CARRIED. Walking Sisters Letter from Paul D. Riggs , 656 Ferndale Court NE, asked recogni- tion of the "Walking Sisters" (Smith) through naming of some civic structure. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appropriation Letter from Public Works Department Utilities requested transfer Water/Sewer within 1975 Water and Sewer Construction Fund to Water Systems Improvements/Hospital Account in amount of $338,586.96 and appropriation of $183,239. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR LEGISLATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President reported 1 :00 P.M. baseball game at Liberty Independence Day Park, 4th of July, Senior Citizen challenge to Council . Challenge Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee report recommending concurrence in appointment by the Mayor of Appointment Mrs. Lillian Poff to the Library Board for five-year term Litrary Board effective to 6/1/86. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. VoLcher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers #34096 through 34376 in amount of $533,407.97; plus LID #314 Revenue Warrant R-7 $15.94; LID 317 Revenue Warrant R-3 $956.50; LID #321 Revenue Warrant R-1 $660; LID #322 Revenue Warrant R-4 $15.93. Vouchers received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, APPROVE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OREINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Was and Means Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the follow- Cor7mittee ing ordinances and summary for second and final readings : Cha3 i rnan: Clymer Ordinance #3551 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from Wocdcock Rezone R-2 to R-3 property located at 123 Pelly Ave. N; known as the Woodcock Rezone R-015-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3552 An ordinance was read authorizing enforcement of restrictions Pal king for on parking for handicapped persons. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND Hardicapped HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. En. orcement CARRIED. Renton City Council 6/8/81 Page 3 Audience Comment - Continued Travel Request Cheryl Bersch asked denial of travel request, that Council con- Continued tinue to honor commitment that official business travel be limited to those states having ratified the Equal Rights Amendment. Ms. Bersch noted the ERA ratification time limit of one additional year (commitment made 4/78) . MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, authorize Fire Marshall to attend conference in Nevada. Discussion ensued. Fire Chief Geissler explained need for attendance. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, REED; 3-NO: STREDICKE, CLYMER, AND TRIMM. CHAIR VOTED NO. MOTION FAILED. Maplewood Heights Ray Griffin, 14306 144th SE, claimed storm drain outfall on Erosion SE 4th P1 . is eroding Maplewood Heights community green belt and asked the outfall be relocated. Griffin requested reply in writing. NE 4th Traffic Griffin also requested limited ingress and egress to NE 4th St. SE 128th) , citing heavy traffic and problems. Councilman Stredicke noted proposed plan for 5th lane (turning lane) . CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Appeal Appeal has been filed regarding Hearing Examiner's recommendation Earlington of First Cities Equities Rezone R-057-80, property lying east Ind. Park Rezone of the proposed P-1 Channel , rezone request from General "G" R-057-80 to M-P Manufacturing Park District classification for future development of industrial park. Examiner recommended denial . Refer to Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. Special Permit Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended approval Stonebrilge Co. with conditions for Special Permit SP-025-81 Stonebridge Company Louis Malesis), located NE 16th St. and Kirkland Ave. NE, 30-unit townhouse apartment complex. Council concur. Cedar Ridge Land Use Hearing Examiner recommends approval with special condi- Final PUD tions for Final Planned Unit Development and Final Plat FPUD-036-81 and Final Plat and FP-037-81 Cedar Ridge Associates. Property is located on the east side of the Seattle-Cedar River Pipeline, adjacent to Philip Arnold Park and north of Royal Hills Drive. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. (See Resolutions #2405 and #2406) Claim for Damages Claim was filed by Gregory M. Fontaine, 903 NW 6th St. , Damages in amount of $350 for damage to bicycle, alleging City car backed over bike in Park Department parking lot. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Court Case Superior Court Summons and Complaint has been filed by Scott A. S.A. Jarvis Jarvis against the City (James Phelan, Hugh Darby and Donald Persson) claiming deprivation of his Constitutional rights. Refer to City Attorney. Subdivision Acting Planning Director Clemens requested amendment to the Sub- Ordinance division ordinance to provide alternatives to public streets in some Short Plat applications and to specify procedures for lot line adjustments. Refer to Planning and Development Committee for report and recommendation. Utility Plant Letter from Ted Bennett, Acting Finance Director, advised Utility Value Plant Value as of 12/31/80 is $23,955,083.63; provided to use for 1982 in lieu of tax payment (service charge) paid by the Utility to the Current Fund. One and 1/2 percent of plant value is the maximum which can be Paid ($359,326) . Refer to the Mayor and Council Budget Committee for budget purposes. Latecomer's Letter from Acting Public Works Director Houghton reported Utilities Agreement Committee approval for request for Latecomer' s Agreement (S-305) McCaslin Joepete McCaslin, sewer line NE 20th St. (Referred 5/11/81 ) . Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreement. Concur. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED. Renton City Council 6/1/81 Page 3 Old Business - Continued . 11 Fence Height Council President Stredicke reported receipt of Board of Adjust- ment report, noting one of items having most Board action during the year was requests for variance relative to fence height. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, MATTER OF VARIANCES FOR FENCE HEIGHT BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Trarsportation Transportation Committee report recommended concurrence with the Comnittee Public Works Department and acceptance of the low bid of M. A. 7E1 Asphalt Segale, Inc. , low bid in amount of $83,280 for the 1981 Asphalt Resurfacing Resurfacing. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE Contract Award REPORT AND AWARD CONTRACT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report noted review of 5/11/81 referral Cornnittee of matter of Hearing Examiner review of Administrative appeals. Chairman: Clymer The report recommended no action be taken, recalling recent review of ordinance by the Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT RE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3549 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final readings Daubert Rezone and adoption of an ordinance rezoning property from General classi- fication G to Business District B-1 located at the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. S and S 7th St. ; known as the Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: STREDICKE, REED, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL; ONE -NO: SHANE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3550 The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and suspension Interim of the rules advancing ordinance to second and final readings. Financing Ordinance was read providing for interim financing of construction LID #321 of LID #321 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Ordinance was read providing for installation of sanitary sewer mains and laterals in the vicining of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE, LID #321 ; financing by Peoples National Bank at 12%. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The committee recommended first reading for the following ordinances : First Readings An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from Wooccock Rezone Residence District R-2 to R-3 located at 123 Pelly Ave. N; known as the Woodcock Rezone R-015-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER THE ORDtNANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Parking for the An ordinance was read providing Police Department enforcement Hancicapped of certain parking restricted to handicapped persons with decal or special license permit. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Cascadia An ordinance was read providing for annexation of certain area to Annexation the City known as the Cascadia Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilman Clymer noted letter received from North Ward, 1115 108th Ave. NE, Bellevue, requesting more time before adoption of ordinance to determine sewer availability. CARRIED. Resclution #2402 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Improvements declaring intent to construct and install curbs, gutters, sidewalks S 3/th St. and storm drainage, street lighting, paving, sanitary sewer, watermain Talbot Rd. and improvements in Talbot Rd. and South 37th St. for LID 324, LID #324 setting Public Hearing 6/22/81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke reported favorable response to neighbor- hood pickup of cuttings, etc. (HUD Program) . Stredicke called attention to July 4th ball game between Council and Senior Citizens at Liberty Park. Renton ,City Council 6/1/8l1 Page 4 New Business - Continued Trains Council President Stredicke inquired re control of train speed to City ordinance, objecting to U.P. 60 mph and suggesting the Valley Cities join together for control purposes. Councilman Shane suggested the City limit length of trains through the City to approximately 40 cars, noting anticipated 100 car trains. Executive MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSION Session FOR DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS. CARRIED. Council commenced Executive Session at 9:45 p.m. and returned to regular Council meeting for roll call (All Council Members present as previously shown) and adjournment. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10: 15 p.m. 4(J ii) 2. 72 a d. Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk BID TAB U L AT ION SHEET PRO J EC T ' NORTH 6th STREET AND LOGAN AVENUE NORTH SIGNALIZATION AND LIGHTING DAT E • May 29, 1981 BIDDER BID Service Electric, Inc. P.O. Box 197 Woodinville, WA 98072 82,685.00 Signal Electric, Inc. 9012 South 208th Kent , WA 98031 71 ,228. 10 Totem Electric of Tacoma, Inc. 2332 Jefferson Ave. Tacoma, WA 98402 70r467.00 Westcoast Electric 18250 68th Ave. South Kent , WA 98031 76,079.25 Engineer's Estimate 65,538.50 Fo se By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTUN CITY COUN''I L MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div /Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of May 18, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Con_act Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ;Consent X Dr David Woodcock; Rezone & Public Hearing Correspondence Special Permit Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. E,ami ner's Report , 4-3-81 Other B. Rdquest for Reconsideration, 4-17-81 A C. E>.aminer's Response, 4-28-81 Approval : Legal Dept . Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ALTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept . Yes No. N/A X with conditions as modified Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The applicant submitted a request for reconsideration during the initial appeal period for the referenced applications to reduce the required landscaping in the area abutting the single family residence. Following review of this alterratide by the city's landscape architect, the Examiner determined that the ccndition should be modified to allow no less than six feet of landscaping in that location. The second appeal period expired on May 12, 1981 , and the matter is now forwarded to the Council for review and subsequent adoption of an ordinance. PARTIES Of RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF R I lb © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oIra rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 9T6.0 SE PI FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -2593 May 14, 1981 Mr. Ned Nelson, AIA 410 Bellevue Way S. E. Bellevue, WA 98004 RE : File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; Dr. David Woodcock Request for Rezone and Special Permit. Dear Mr. Nelson: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of April 3, 1981 , and modified in response to a request for reconsideration, dated April 28, 1981 , have not been further appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, these applications are being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval . You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council . Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department it it III 0"—' tS 0 o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 sia rn BARBARA Y. 5rH'NPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 090 Pam' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 Obit,. SEP10 0 April 28, 1981 Mr. Ned Nelson, AIA 410 Bellevue Way S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; Dr. David Woodcock Request for Rezone and Special Permit; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. Nelson: I have had an opportunity to review your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter, and find that your request is justified in light of the review by Jerry Lind, the city's Landscape Architect . Therefore, the condition which requires ten feet (10' ) of landscaping in the area abutting the single family residence is modified to allow no less than six feet (6' ) of landscaping in that location, and subject to review and approval of the city's Landscape Architect. A new appeal period has now been established for this application to expire on May 12 , 1981 . If further information is required, please contact this office. Sincerely, A- pi .‘( 1)401 Fred J . Kaufman F Hearing Examiner 1r R' y cc: Parties of Record N RECEJ\IrD 0 'V APR 281981 151 1 y NG DE.P P. BUILDING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0gr6) SEP1 . April 23, 1981 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR TO: Fred Kaufman FROM: Jerry Lind RE: File No. R-015-81, SP-016-81; David G. Woodcock; Request for Reconsideration Pursuant to your memorandum of April 20, 1981 regarding the above request for reconsideration, it would seem to be a satisfactory solution to allow a reduction of the landscape buffer from ten to six feet as the applicant has proposed. It is my belief that the intensity of the landscaping proposed within the six foot strip would be sufficient to screen the adjoining single family home and still allow enough space for interior landscaping to abut the clinic. I would further recommend the addition of approximately three trees within this strip as an additional mitigation measure for the screening. These should be canopy type trees such as a maple or oak, and be placed on 30 foot centers. JFL/mp cc: Ron Nelson Dave Clemens RECEIVEDDickHoughton CITY OF RENTON HEAR?NG EXAMINER APR 2 4. 1981 AM Pub! 161%411112a 1213 415r6 A OF R 4, C z THE CITY OF RENTON MUN;C,e AL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z tL o BARBARA' Y. SHINPOGH, MAYOR o LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p Q. co FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9. t4 O SEPZE April 20, 1981 TO: Jerry Lind, Building Department FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; David G. Woodcock; Request for Rec:: nsideration This office has received a request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter in regard to landscape treatment necessary to buffer an adjoining single family home. Would you please review the attached alternative plans and the original recommendation of this office. The applicant wants to landscape the north side of the clinic facility between the parking lot and the clinic. The recommendation concentrated the landscaping next to the single family residence located immediately to the north of the proposed parking lot. Please feel free to make suggestions on carrying out both purposes , if possible, but concentrating on buffering the single family home. Both landscaping and fencing may be utilized for this purpose. There are dimensional constraints, so please consult with the Planning and Building Departments in this matter. Please respond as quickly as possible but not later than Friday as a reconsideration must be published within 10 days of receipt by this office. iT7ri cc: Planning Department Building Department Public Works Department rti'D NELSON • AI2CITEC `" 410 Bellevue Way (Southeast quite 301 Bellevue, Washtn8ton 98004 206) 455-4900 April 17, 1981 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 123 Pelly Avenue North Parking Lot Addition for Existing Clinic Dear Mr. Kaufman: We wish to request reconsideration of the above referenced project in regard specifically to the 10 ' landscape buffer that has been required by your office as part of your approval of our re-zone and special permit . It is my feeling that the 10' landscape buffer on the north side of the parking lot would almost totally eliminate any landscaping next to our building and tend to reduce the quality of the over- all project. I appreciate your concern for the 10' buffer but wonder if we couldn ' t solve it in one of the following three methods: Alternate #1 : Reduce the buffer to 6' and intensify the landscaping both by specie as well as quantity. Alternate #2 : Provide one of the schemes as recommended by the Planning Department. Alternate #3 : Allow us to proceed with our scheme as presented with the addition of an attractively designed site screening cedar, stained fence, approximately 4' high on the property line . We appreciate your time and trouble in reviewing with possible reconsideration of your recommendations . Please call if you have any questio s. Sincer y Ci RECEIVED TY OF RENTON HEARING E:IAMINL1 Ned Ne s n, AIA i1 1 . AM raNN/r' 7r ir9rl0,Url2rl 2r'.s'rr,:>`.i A Member•Amertcan Institute of Architect* AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 3rd day of April 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the II parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this Sti day of ve. 19 F/ . Nota Public in and for the Stat . of Washington, residing a Application, Petition or Case: Dr. David Woodcock; R-015-81 , SP-016-81 The mi.nuteb contain a U5t o6 the paAtied og necond. ) 0,11/ 11r2pL April 3, 1981 Ur RENT a - OP f OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER V 3 1° CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: /A, Dr. David Woodcock FILE NO. R-015-81 , NG SP-016-81 LOCATION: 123 Pelly Avenue N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and approval of a special permit to use the subject site as a parking lot to service an existing clinic. SUMMARY OF ACTION/ Planning Department Recommendation (Rezone) : Approval RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Recommendation (Special Permit) : Approval subject to execution of restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner Recommendation (Rezone and Special Permit) : Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 18, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 24, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Rezone Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Special Permit Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #3: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #4: Site Plan of Parking as submitted Exhibit #5: Alternative Parking Lot Design submitted by Planning Department Mr. Blaylock advised that the modified parking lot design would require pruning of an existing spruce tree located at the northeast corner of the site. Referencing Section M. 1 of the special permit recommendation, the Examiner noted that covenants precluding subsequent sale of Lot No. 4 would not be necessary if the entire property were replatted and the three lots were consolidated into one parcel . He then inquired regarding the total number of required parking spaces. Mr. Blaylock advised that 19 stalls would be required. The Examiner noted that once the building is brought into conformity with required parking, the use would be conforming and parking could not be eliminated through the sale of Lot No. 4. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section M.3 of the Planning Department report, second line, to reference Section L.5, not L.4. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Ned Nelson 410 Bellevue Way S.E. , Suite 301 Bellevue, WA 98004 Mr. Nelson stated that parking space is inadequate in the area and approval of the special permit would be beneficial both to the subject property and the surrounding neighborhood. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 PageiTwo He supported the proposal to consolidate the three lots into one parcel in order to conform to the applicant ' s site plan, Exhibit #4, which he preferred to the alternative site plan submitted by the Planning Department. Mr. Nelson indicated that resale of the property would be difficult if sufficient parking is not provided. He also advised concurrence in retaining the existing spruce tree which will buffer the new parking lot from the adjacent residence. Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding proximity of the residence to the south to the subject site, Mr. Blaylock advised that from 10 to 15 feet separate the two. Mr. Nelson clarified that due to the operating hours of the clinic from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the latest, problems with headlights shining into adjacent residences would be minimal , and if complaints were received in the future, a small fence could be erected as part of the landscaping program. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. Since there was no response, the hearing regarding File No. SP-016-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:45 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 5,000 square feet from R-2 zoning (Duplex Residential) to R-3 zoning (Medium Density Multifamily) together with a special permit to establish an accessory parking lot for a professional clinic. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property is located at 123 Pelly Avenue N. The property is located about midblock on the west side of the street. The site is essentially level . An existing single family home located on the subject site will be removed if the requests are approved. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 156 in 1909. The site was classified R-2 upon adoption of the initial zoning ordinance in 1953. 9. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing. 10. The applicant proposes establishing a parking lot on the subject site to serve as accessory parking for the adjoining clinic operated by the applicant. In order to establish the clinic or its accessory uses on the subject site the applicant has requested that the property be reclassified to R-3. An R-3 zoning designation permits the establishment of clinics and accessory uses after approval of a special permit Section 4-709A(A) (3)) • 11 . The area in which the subject site is located has a variety of uses. The adjacent lot to the north is used for a single family home. Immediately to the south is the clinic operated by the applicant. Similar clinics and a duplex are established on the east side of Pelly Avenue in this vicinity. Other single family uses are located to the rear (west) of the site adjacent to the alley. 12. The subject site is at the extreme southern part of a large multiblock R-2 zone. The clinic to the south is part of a three parcel P-1 zone. Across from the clinic and slightly southeast of the subject site is a two parcel R-3 zone with a duplex residence. 13. The proposed parking lot is intended to serve the adjoining clinic which has R-015-81 , SP-016-81 Page Three insufficient parking both for its needs and for current city requirements. The clinic is now a legal non-conforming use. Ten additional parking spaces are proposed for the subject site for a total of 20 stalls for the clinic. Nineteen stalls are still required (Section 4-2208(2) (A) ) . 14. Since the subject site is a separate legal lot, the driveway serving the proposed parking lot may not be less than five feet from the adjoining property line. Either a variance from Section 4-2208(2) (A) or a replatting of the subject lot and the adjacent clinic property would permit the driveway as proposed. The applicant indicated that replatting the property was a strong possibility. Replatting the property would perpetually tie the parking lot to its principal use in conformance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. CONCLUSIONS: (Rezone) 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The R-3 classification requested by the applicant is compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The area is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing which is permitted by the R-3 zoning requested. 3. The area was zoned R-2 in 1953 upon enactment of the original zoning ordinance. Since that time, there have been no further zoning analyses of the area or of the subject parcel . 4. There was a similar request in 1979 (File No. R-364-79) for R-3 zoning on the other side of Pelly Avenue N. In that case that applicant also wanted to establish a clinic. The City Council in granting an appeal reversed the Hearing Examiner and granted R-3 zoning and the special permit to allow a clinic. 5. While the R-3 zoning is not especially compatible with either the R-2 zoning which predominates in the area nor the P-1 zoning just south of the subject property, the Comprehensive Plan does designate the area for medium density multifamily uses, and therefore the request would not be spot zoning. 6. The property to the north is still used for single family housing and should also be protected from the proposed higher density zoning and uses which may be potentially established on the subject parcel . Unless the single family use is protected by substantial landscaping and fencing, the property value of this adjoining parcel will be impaired in violation of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the appropriate city agency should review and approve all landscape plans for the subject site in order to provide a consistent policy of adequately buffering the single family uses from higher intensity uses similar to the subject site's R-3 zoning. Adequate buffering shall consist of not less than 10 feet of landscape treatment. Special Permit) 7. In order to approve a special permit, the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed use, which is otherwise prohibited in the zone requested, will not adversely affect the general health, safety or welfare and will not adversely affect neighboring properties. While the proposal would impose a parking lot immediately adjacent to a single family use, adequate screening of no less than 10 feet of landscaping may serve to buffer and protect the single family home from the light, noise, glare and odors generated by the proposed parking lot. R-015-81 , 3P-016-81 Page Four 8. The clinic is already an existing non-conforming use as to parking, and the proposal amounts to creating a parking lot for the clinic on the subject site. Parking lots are not only accessory uses to clinics but required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The establishment of the parking lot will enable the applicant 's clinic to attain a legal and conforming status under the Zoning Code. Once such status is established, the applicant may not remove or otherwise separate the parking lot from the clinic. For this reason the applicant should replat the subject lot and the adjoining clinic property into one parcel . This would permanently couple the required parking and the clinic use. This consolidation would also eliminate any need for a variance from the provision of the Parking and Loading Ordinance with reference to driveway/lot line distance. 9. There are additional questions raised as to promotion and protection of the public interest in both preserving property values and preserving the pool of land designated for multifamily residential purposes within the city, especially the urban core. The current application is a further example of the pyramiding permitted by the Zoning Code. Such pyramiding permits usurption of land designated for one purpose by another mutually exclusive use. In this case, land designated for residential purposes is converted to parking for a clinic. The area in which the subject site is located is generally zoned for duplex residential development, but there are a number of clinics in the area. While the Comprehensive Plan indicated that such professional uses may be compatible with multifamily housing Page 11 , Land Use Report) , the purpose of such inclusion is to permit some professional offices in residential neighborhoods but not to permit the conversion of residential neighborhoods to professional parks. Since this pyramiding effect may, in fact, be causing an adverse effect on the available supply of land of certain types within the city, the City Council may wish to study this issue in more detail . 10. While generally the City Council only passes upon the rezone request contained within this report, the second matter is closely associated with the rezone and cannot be approved without approval of the rezone, and, therefore, both matters have been forwarded to the City Council for review. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject property from R-2 to R-3 subject to provision of a 10-foot landscape buffer, the planting treatment subject to review by the appropriate city agency. The special permit to establish an accessory use, a parking lot, for a clinic in an R-3 zone should be approved subject to approval of the above reclassification request and subject to replatting the subject lot and adjacent clinic into one parcel . ORDERED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 . Fred J. Ka an Land Use He ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Ned Nelson, 410 Bellevue Way S.E. , Suite 301 , Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney R-015-81 , SP-016-81 Page Five Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 17, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. I I I i I 1111U• ill ie l..:: O CIs C C/nR \ 1 I H s • e. PO[JNOR, CO 1 SrAO/V44 J / / 3 oN' 41411,1, 1. r_ i•• t,//' t •API X iimiTlitiviL7 4,),.\,,: ii.;::) 1.---4 a__ a .- _ ,•_ ... vi. i i ,i, 11, 9 ilk PV-i i, ,... -A- . „„ rL•iimlte rn rr lle,-r i 4 j . •;' .ism tbkrLIa t\'.1'. 4, 31 7 rw, tri_iit-, z:. dimedibim- rh. , s . ' .t: - 4- N.; 4=alev:46-riz:. / c IiillEntain . 18 05—.1siin ail/. P14RK la,. „;,, N, <4,, 7 y- 1 r R 2 s,Nblt .,[,l t ., I 1 MIYr rlOr `1/ irara T Y Qal meow rirar,. , yj1 iiii 2 ` r Lv., NAM al SOW II dull Win iBaF a, .. Rocceellit.a'. ',..IL .-1--nz -72:dm"' 1"" MI: %.4-7i A 11 q '_',;_`; ,- ' :_<' mares I - - `a ; , L MRQto < " is t ra C ' r r a,.: `:` r!FYI v f i .X'.,.III inr. H-11--. iwt ...,,,- ,,, v1 _,. , 6;2 t -,_ ,,L. - vael, _ 1 ,, . s ,,\ ,11000.• :-.:.- .,.. - .1 ...2.• ct: . l' - ZEri- i,I 41.- - - e_ C'.a s"rs X• E. 1 lir :. a -r: i tow, . - A J[ 1 a MI I- y- raz :==. , 1 / V pi APPLICANT DAVID G . WOODCOCK , JR . TOTAL AREA +5,000 sq . ft . PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Pelly Avenue North EXISTING ZONING R-2, Resdience two family ; min . lot size 7 ,200 sq . ft . EXISTING USE Single Family Dwellings PROPOSED USE Rezone to R-3 ; Special Permit for parking lot COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family COMMENTS 11rA_- k 7irm Nyuso+oldo S ; wand r(i(1t1 95noH 4NLLGI7rD riOlriaf i I rI 6 I 33 rm 1nD9aTJ LT7Qln7 b I N 'DAY /"1-1Ad ti m _tone wba+ No10 'IS 'TIe 4,10-1 JNF IvJ3l R os or oc oZ a % o r„ V V Y V -+'-"-r xrmoe ik rx.•Maac.j M+M1 pis trrav+01 "—=,,iyY ., blo, r • ¢ 0 610,-- i - Z.1m 37f1 S r lJc Ixa P 0 Q of a von 4-0.1. .a orf ddW A11N171A cnoH loss 11 in do III!I9P` 9 I. 1 d oz rz c _ 1 N snv 1 e I r-- -- i I - — C] 3Xn4 c G1 1ISS-T r71L 9t+11s x 7) l 1 k r I1NH yu ic_rwAroriNzled39GZio' I i t SttaS 61 'N d ts ooe'e a ry Tolol- 016 sno n v s9NIQ 1mC 71Ni70 Ni1GExJ—j c 1 i ` 1"MH-w 1• I I r • • sariarmc f mInr+1rrn0 Mur^Nb TJ7n 17h7,d'i J I.,a m zsA aav Z 1 urovid r+n+lae amvbo, J 3 3 rIfwIds +ois•,o,t 1k, 1r SIJiITI'dG r'bu1(!Jo/417 \\\\N roc TK79• vreo-rra9.2laD1nri g. C '' 3'ii I ctitiNs Mb17 1•imVilFvll y r'.92v II-• 11 U N 1lakit-r0;z4-Crrt7wnlne snnn2ld Y r 8 7 f Ali CIO loaranc - AwrTv gNUST7rs--t GJ1`I1d`d75dN`9> p9 f•a: I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 24, 1981 APPLICANT : Dr . David Woodcock FILE NUMBER : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and approval of a special permit to use the subject site as a parking lot to service an existing clinic . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: David G. Woodcock , Jr . 2 . Applicant : David G . Woodcock , Jr . 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 123 Pelly Avenue North 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 5,000 square feet 6. Access :Via Pelly Avenue North 7 . Existing Zonings R-2, Residence two family ; minimum lot size 7, 200 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-2 ; R-3, Residence Multiple Family, Minimum lot size 5,000 square feet ; P-1 , Public Use District 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on March 8, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on March 6, 1981 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TC IE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : March 24, 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE TWO C . HISTORY, :ACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance No . 156 in 1909. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) This is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installa- tions . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 3 . Vegetation : Some lawn and a few shrubs are the principal features on the site. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (March 6, 1981) . 6 . Land Use : An existing single family dwelling is located on the subject site with similar uses to the north and west . A clinic is adjacent to the south with single family dwellings, a duplex , and another clinic to the east . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are a combination of clinics and single family dwellings . F . PU::LIC SERVIICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : A 6" water main runs north-south on Pelly Avenue North along the east side of the street while an 8 inch sanitary sewer also runs north-south along the westerly border of the property . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro transit Routes No . 107 , 155, and 240 operate along Park Avenue North approximately one block to the east of the subject site. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Recreation : Not applicable . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2, Residence Two Family 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 ; Residence Multiple Family 3 . Section 4-722B, Special Permits H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CO1PREHENSIVIE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUl? ENT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives ; Pages 17-18. 2 . Policy Statement, Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan , Page 4 ; Section 4A-2, The Community. PLANNING DEPARTME PRELIMINARY REPOR 0 THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : march 24 , 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT OIL THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Future paving of the site will remove the vegetation and cause an increase in storm water runoff and traffic and noise levels in the area . Proper development controls and procedures should mitigate these impacts, however . 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3. Schools : Not applicable 4. Social : Minor 5 . Traffic : No real increase in vehicle trips can be expected as the proposed improvements will only be accommodating already existing traffic . J . EbNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee on March 4 , 1981 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: REZONE 1 . The rezone request is generally consistent with the high density multiple family designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposed rezone and use is generally consistent with the R-3 parcels and clinic use on the east side of Pelly Avenue and the P-1 zoning and similar clinic use on the property adjacent to the south . 3 . The subject site has retained its R-2 classification since the zoning ordinance was adopted in 1953. This would suggest that the designation has not been specifically considered in a previous area zoning or land use analysis other than the Compre- hensive Plan of 1965 . 4. On November 19, 1979 , a rezone from R-2 to R-3 was approved at 110 Pelly Avenue North for a clinic and associated parking) use to the east of the subject site. (R-364-79 ) 5. Items L-2 through L-4 appear to indicate that the subject site is potentially zoned for the R-3 classi- fication requested (Section 4-3014-C) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T( iE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : Marcri 24 , 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE FOUR SPECIAL PERMIT 1 . The applicant proposes to remove the existing dwelling on 123 Pelly Avenue North and utilize the space for additional parking stalls associated with the clinic use at 115 - 121 Pelly Avenue North . 2 . The existing clinic of +3, 800 square feet requires 19 parking stalls . The site plan as submitted indicates that 20 stalls will be provided. 3 . Section 4-2204-8B( 1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires a minimum five foot landscape buffer between those sides of a parking lot that are adjacent to land used and/or zoned for residen- tial purpose . The property adjacent to the north is so classified and the site plan indicates such a buffer . However , the Engineering Division has advised that the new curb cut for Lot No . 4 must be located 5 feet from the property line. In order to meet this standard, the landscaping requirement, the 24 feet aisle and the 20 feet stall length provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, it will be necessary to reverse the parking stall alignment . Such an adjustment would bring the site plan into compliance with these standards . See exhibit for illustration) In addition , a detailed landscaping plan will have to be submitted to and approved by the Building Department. 4. The parking lot should be considered as an integral part of the medical clinic , since it brings the facility into compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. If the property were covenanted to require that Lots 2 , 3 , and 4 could only be sold together, modification of the parking lot would not be required per Section 4-2204( 2)A which addresses driveway locations . This has the advantage over reversing the parking lot in that it saves a major spruce tree (40 feet high ) at the northeast corner of the site . 5 . Storm drainage installation and improvement of the alley from the subject site to North First Street will be required as per Engineering comment. Also the existing driveways in front of Lots 2 and 3 must be closed. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: REZONE Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the requested rezone be approved . SPECIAL PERMIT Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the requested special permit be approved subject to the following: PLANNING DEPARTM-' - PRELIMINARY REPO TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : March 24, 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE FIVE 1 . Filing of restrictive covenants limiting subsequent sale of Lot No. 4 to be linked to the sale of the clinic located on Lots No . 2 and 3 per analysis point L-4. 2 . Submitted to and approved by the Building Depart- ment, a detailed landscape plan. 3. Satisfaction of the Engineering Division requirements as per L-4. ItU•I ' 1 ILA 1 - PACIFIC CAR. 0 - s r E ----- Ai FOIJNDRV CO j o i`' i an ' i -_- • _ R-4lin I! Ii 7AO/NM I 1/1 1• it ;: I i, / 11, L ii 1 1 s _ z..._ zj„..__\ t''.-„ , it.1..1z2 _,, m , -. , .,...v..iltoi. - 7- "• Minh / 7 4. / N,= gi 14 ir ,Tilt.67, 0 rup.., EA # p- : 1 I IV ' / ' i C i'l I 1'lir -4 a.47. I iii i. : It 11 iirw-- :' ii .:` ' r. lrea i'h' i-i•,ii,ih..ip 4411.41.1a., z, e Mt1f an+ 7 z 1 l . 11;. 1i4i: tL....11011111 UP '..! i ME Imo 11„..., i.,,, 1.1 4,,, ,,,, ,,,,„... !,.,....._ _ I 1k'MI ff. 611111111111E r` Pal 1 Bp.11 iii - JVN,Ot r_ Ai l' i/ t _ r il 1 eer = 7'r s 4• a,:,.. r^ 7t 1r i t, adt , i' aJ..,.t w +. I iii lf i a r esi, a my F o Mr1; ice a M r•Nor, • 7•• non t C ri A S8'f.1.^f ay!n P . Ll it t' '7 1fit- t G it¢' NIA i ppt, . i1lf4,c:111 a c "`\a•. " I H_1rLn i MN EU r1„i_t . i tam ... . 1R._ = K IT, Ill Cal Kr1 IK X 1 $ huI7J ;'I 4 L APPLICANT DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. TOTAL AREA +5,000 sq . ft . PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Pelly Avenue North EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Resdience two family ; min . lot size 7 , 200 sq . ft . EXISTING USE Single Family Dwellings PROPOSED USE Rezone to R-3 ; Special Permit for parking lot COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family COMMENTS I. i3 LANDSCAPING 4 sXISTIHib ALLAY lk 9u5JecT elrig 44016 i tYlfIF1 •TAI..L9` G P2uNue a UTurnILUS 2'2 fA7R i 1? NI a r ` I FATCIAboiERcrrtBru. 9TaRM DRNNK PM wJeeL.2•64LI..,s. 5wL cr+J cfr/or firafJ, d Qba4a Sra w i WG P.-NoG OH 30 34 Moaf,MJToN6 j to y L aREa•3 eery/00J PLA 7TIIIb l i.MEt7 PDX M1ILf+ i I, ,y T 1111j I.PLANT u6cGaep.bte Wf7H earl JJCfeR-/it0YRi7S. a 3Pe-,Fl4.a.T EX15TiNC Cl iNIC IJILDING i B Houstti. ONE gTo2y TOTisL ART 9,soo9f! t I 1 . P -PI -1 s_ J PRoFoSFO PARI'JNb j .s n~ h 4 FOR 0c1TINCLINIG I 1 S X t 111 f j YYY 1 titar7:1- 6 cxrsTi :raLl} a a' PELa y ws. N.• 24' I* 20 y 6 9_-,-- sllIIIICI; i_ :friI 1- T Hain VICINITY MAP Norm+ \ 1111 11JNewwxsak ' LAF J-CAA al 0 4a• ll• LOT 2 LOTS a LOT4 r` 4\V .. TOI TINC YPOLJC.E VANI 40'HIeM j a e 7 4-Po faa frua t' I Nevi CJKO CUT.' o s to an 50 •o so 1 me AL: ii ^' Lot*, EN. 24,RENTON t'safzen PLAT Ns 3. 6 1 PBLLY AV6. N.I. cuge car Calbe f ur OF R, j ti I I/r` ,-s i v' v ICU O a FEB 19 1981 RENTow axfoTNb House 0415111J[0 DUPt t1U t oPTOMeTit1 C1Jdr s I I I Y/9/ Planning 12'-19/9 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation :_kcZ®N IR-6/5-8i) te,sAAfeML Ptegif?(5P-c44-l — a ito AQ- 3) — Location : 1a 3 i/ vie .44 Applicant :v• TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /4F/Y)( Police Department 40114h4k MEETING DATE : Public Works Department GIR.C. zfri L Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities E°igi veering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Approved , Approved with Conditions Not Approved G J'`.t-r• a a 41 2 44e6.1 ,4 N11 - s# e ) ffr— Z/L0 Signature of Director or Authorized ep esentat ' v Da REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 4fJV/g/ Plann 12-19 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : eGZONE tea-his* f,AFe.mL 45006.7ligurii,1144#4,_sermike_tayi e Ls*nj cG•s c - jRI0,Q ) Location : 1a344L4l dye •114 tt eApplicant : Q pd_ A & Aar D w•d TO: Par s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :d Police Department 401400k MEETING DATE : Public Works Department c,R•C• " S1 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE xxx Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved This is a much needed improvement in the area. Lt. D. i7 rsson 3/3/8181 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date V/S/ Planning 1'2-1979 ' RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) REVIEW SHEET Application : G ZO Nk' 1R.ii5-8. (SAF'/AL p iehtiT($P O -9,) EOr 11041.46fid S&rvJcP f.r% ettt Jr*nj Ciffl fie- - tit. a 7102- 3) Location :1a 3 Ally Ave .44 Appl i cant: AfOOdepck Or. Vs'Q1 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :41;44W Police Department A-lt ' .. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department etR.C. << S1 Y Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division tilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:u0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ns Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7 k: LA/17- ex--i 2 A,r/6)/' Signature o Director or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l7,c ri o Pr. Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved L_ 3 L/'/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 717 v/g/ Planninc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : RC2®Nt' IR-o/5-8) C li' L s' far paricitz kit o se'r. rig exis*ni clot t - AR- a )10A- 3) Location : J / 0 3 eillrAit? •44 Appl i cant : Ivoodeacki _Or. At w TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :4/40 Police Department A.14144, MEETING DATE : GPublicWorksDepartment 4.6 1r 1 •13/2 -- Engineering Division Pfic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:u0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :L 2< Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7 2- ----- f-- y Signature of 4ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved , Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date a yig/ Planni 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : 6Pa.ZDA/lt—®/. -•8) CSieFemi, pckl1NTesP-e,/,‘- forparkiAllitg_o_ser vie e a rt c i'S)'%n 1 c ien t'e.- - fit• +Z Ito A- 3) Location : 4/03- //r ,4Ve •4' c J yApplicant : kJordcoc , Dr1 bawd TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :p_421 Police Department MEETING DATE : Public Works Department t.R.C. En Bering Division 1 Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :0u P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-015-81, SP-016-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-019-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from R-2 to R-3 in order to secure approval of a special permit to allow use of site for parking associated with an adjacent clinic Proponent:David G. Woodcock, Jr. Location of Porposal: 123 Polly Avenue North Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 4, 1981, following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-019-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: March 4, 1981 2) Applications: R-015-81, SP-016-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Police Department Utilities Engineering Department Fire Department Engineering Department Traffic Engineering Department Building Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures: 64Yx , 'cal Rbnald G. Nelson, David R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director 12// R. hard Hou hton, Act 'g P blic Works Direct() DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 8, 1981 XPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 22, 1981 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. EDEN ESTATES (MARK HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA) Applications for preliminary plat approval of 11-lot single family subdivision, file PP-079-80, and exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance regarding access to allow a cul-de-sac of 700 feet in length along with a reduced width of 25 feet and the creation of three pipestem lots, files E-021-81, E-022-81, and E-023-81; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 2. Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3, file R-015-81, and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic, file SP-016-81; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: March 8, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of March, 1981. SIGNED: 144-vu4‘rP1 NOTICE THIS p ,,i opERTy GENERAL LOCATION: APO, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 123 PELLY AVENUE NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL llESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MARCH 24, 1981 BEGINNING AT 9:00 q,M, P.M. CONCERNING ITEM EJS REZONE R-015-81 - R-2 TO R-3 Vi SPECIAL PERMIT - SP-016-81 - TOg1A1KING III SITE APPROVAL WAIVER III SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERW yr DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - DIRECT APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 236 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATIO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MARCH 4 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS: NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY (AUSTIN COMPANY) ECF-602-80; SA-092-80) FRED BOWSER (ECF-642-80; R-135-80) DAVE BEST (ECF-631-80; R-125-80) FOR RECONSIDERATION: HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (ECF-013-81; SA-010-81) NEW BUSINESS: ECF-020-81 H. A. AND JANET BLENCOE SA-017-81 Application for site approval to V-019-81 allow expansion of medical/dental facility through second floor addition and application for variance from Parking and Loading Ordinance regarding parking requirements; property located at 138, 200, and 206 South 3rd Place ECF-624-80 CHARLES R. UNGER SM-87-80 Application for Shoreline Manage- ment Substantial Development Permit to allow construction of 20 ' x 20 ' deck; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Boulevard North ECF-017-81 EMILIO AND RICHARD PIEROTTI SP-013-81 Application for special permit to fill 8+ acres with material from PACCAR, which would consist of dirt and iron scrap; property located in the vicinity of 3315 Talbot Road South ECF-019-81 DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. R-015-81 Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3 and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North ENVIRONMENTAL RL.,_,2W COMMITTEE 1 (-- - REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 4, 1981 11= ' • I I F iiiI, g 1 I CITY OF RENTON I "" , t. psi C 4 or• . . - : 4,Z .:17 I a Ific. vi. y UNGER 4ligf 4 4 j 1l 117CECF-624 ' ,1 i MAY CREEK ' . IAl J/ ir1l1 OAK IR--r,;. LAKE NGTON l'\-1,1' Idle I.L---- - ,-----1 4 Z.,...„..,,I r-+r- I-r, _ i:., ..: _'-4--- dit .` s. A L.- i 1411,ire glel ill lY` r '' -'; CEDAR RIVER I :; I I I, 4 OCK CF-019-: r 7 BLACK • I isi) fffUk `46' I RIVER •; T' E (C I 't } s - - ..'1 c SPR I NGBROOK -r J— - i- CREEK ky.. III AUS ; 111\ y VI( N.) (ECF", 60FAO r m 7 ; ,rj t ,,.. ..l,f1), 4k T---7-1---;_f . ,i. T 1 f 1 T.: fil I R IERO fi , c r___i, CF-,F''' Y.r i c r1 J EST (EC -634 8 _-_ L 1 f GREEN BOWSER CFI-6 2-too) RIVER tf 1 l LAKE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 24 , 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. EDEN ESTATES (MARK HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA) Applications for preliminary plat approval of 11-lot single family subdivision, file PP-079-80, and exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance regarding access to allow a cul-de-sac of 700 feet in length along with a reduced width of 25 feet and the creation of three pipestem lots, files E-021-81, E-022-81, and E-023-81; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 2 . DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3, file R-015-81, and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic, file SP-016-81; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 24 , 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED: March 8, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of March, 1981. SIGNED: 47144.444.0471.1 OF I t0y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oma 4 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT co' 235- 2550 09gT D SE PIe46 March 6, 1981 Mr. David G. Woodcock, Jr. 115 Pelly Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 Re: David G. Woodcock, Jr. ; File Nos. R-015-81 and SP-016-81 ; Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3 and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North. Dear Mr. Woodcock: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on February 23, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 24 , 1981 , at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB:gh NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. CHARLES, UNGER (ECF-624-80) Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, file no. SM-87-80, to allow construction of 20 ' x 20 ' deck; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Boulevard North. 2. DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. (ECF-019-81) Application for rezone, file no. R-015-81, from R-2 to R-3 and special permit, file no. SP-016-81, to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a declaration of significance for the following project: 1. EMILIO AND RICHARD PIEROTTI (ECF-017-81) Application for special permit, file no. SP-013-81, to fill 8+ acres with material from PACCAR, which would consist of dirt and iron scrap; property located in the vicinity of 3315 Talbot Road South Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by March 22 , 1981. Published: MARCH 8, 1981 Non E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION PROPOSED ACTION FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW PARKING LOT ADDITION; FILE NO (s) R-015-81 and SP-016-81 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 123 PELLY AVENUE NORTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE f E.R.C. 3 HAS DETE MINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, [DOES GOES NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON- MENT. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, DWILL ILL NOT, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.,MARCH 22, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON P"..ANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-015-81, SP-016-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-019-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from R-2 to R-3 in order to secure approval of a special permit to allow use of site for parking associated with an adjacent clinic Proponent:David G. Woodcock, Jr. Location of Porposal: 123 Pelly Avenue North Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 4, 1981, following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-019-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: March 4 , 1981 2) Applications: R-015-81, SP-016-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Police Department Utilities Engineering Department Fire Department Engineering Department Traffic Engineering Department Building Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : Rbnald G. Nelson, David R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director Riohard Houghton, Act ' g Public Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 8, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 22, 1981 717y/g/ Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : CCZoN' ! 4/3-8 ,.Sme/AL Q“0"T.sP-Ord-80 for pa 4101 lot 14, Serviee ahh et,'sT.n c iitG - fR a 40i 3.) Location : 1a 3 Ave .,/. l) r Appl i cant : woodcock Dr . paved TO: _ Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :4/40 Police Department 4, MEETING DATE : GPublicWorksDepartment R.e. << it .3fVe-- Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other ) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN3 FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved Z 3 N S S'f sg? 9) Pr''7i . a4 s Signature of Director or Authorized epresentativ Da 7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 20V/8/ Pl anni n f 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : PCZON LR-oi51 ) r,SAF`z4L QC MlT(SP-Dlge-tl 0 r pa t ki,e 4* 2 ser omiteb eitedi c 11 a rp/Q- 3) Location : a3 All e .44r Appl i cant : Woe dew/PI Or, faWW'e TO: Par s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATELVACO , Police Department 41R014k MEETING DATE : Public Works Department E.R.c. <<3./VIELI Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 0u P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE xxx Approved Approved with Conditions A Not Approved This is a much needed improvement in the area. Lt. D. i7 rsson 3/3/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 2/ay/g/ Plannin 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : d?&ZONV (-o15-49 t:sikr<//it, Q‘R/11/es-/p-D/gg'Gs?l forliarlbtflot_.#41t_serviLeAket_eit i•sYmA j c&irt - - IR' a 4alQ• ) Location : a3 $ y Avg •6' Applicant :ppdi Day, e/ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :4/04t Police Department 4004 MEETING DATE : jPublicWorksDepartment6,A.C. 14 y •• Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division lities Engineering 1 Fi ti re Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OUP .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved t_.)0-0`" 04,r g/ Signature o Director or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7c,JtY O6Pr, Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 0./P/A--3/z`', Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 2/=y/gi Pl anni n 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App1i cation : PC zo NE- (R.ii5 &) C,SA( 7.41 PP,p tr(Sp-Dl6-e 6r paricift / Alt fe, d&VX e c,•s*:- chs c . fRLoi )- 3) Location : 03A11 Ave .44 Applicant : AlOOercock r bawd/ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE :4/42% Police Department A-1lt . MEETING DATE : jPublicWorksDepartmentE.IQ.C. I y . En ering Division 1 Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. i IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 0U P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : d71' Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 2/j y/S/ Pl anni n 1 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :jec_ZO Ntr (R.ois-8) C , A C/AL PEsehII T's/o-ol - fo r pa rJC s for a scrim a dun eitiS n. &G', . f* o/ 3) Q lLocation : 1a3i G II e .44r1/ Applicant : Iv bed etal , 4r. Dtyt'! TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :4/40 Police Department 4111#0440. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department EIR.e. << 3/Va. Engineering Division Tr is Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :4b Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved e---,- 1.f9b, 2_ - _.r- f f , Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date S REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Date circulated : 47-10 l CommenLs due : 3 IN U VIROMlHE9cTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - eqf - 1 APPLICATION No (s ) . 0?-,0/„54/ r 56 Ql4 8/ PROPONENT :Qodcockr Dr. ,Q4wc1 PROJECT TITLE : g 04/e- -( & L , it Brief Description of Project : Kc0 ,s7tj•v- 1-CZcm..e.ill 2 - llrcia 1pp't•ty#71"0 (Iir Apo r1Cint ee 71olerO'ra 4n elf I`s 1 clin<< LOCATION : /a 3 Pet/y ,l ie• N. SITE AREA : t _.5-04,eigel. BUILDING AREA (gross) ----- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVILI.1 NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use coni'licts : View obstruction : i 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : xxx 1 14 ) Public services : xxxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : I This parking lot would be an improvement to the area and is very much needed. Recommendation : DNSI xxx DOS More Information__ Reviewed by : Lt' Persson t itle : Date :3/3/81 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 4l67-10/ Comments due : 3/Y/P/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - APPLICATION No (s) . i'C-D/ -/SA— Qlb S/ PROPONENT : So c Ck/ 1)r. L.JetV/'l PROJECT TITLE :00z-Ani r Brief Description of Project : /4,es?tjar,.- 1'l2-0xe .+. /0 c7-6 1Q- f X'c[QI7 otervrce4 bl elrst C LOCATION : /a 3 Pe'//y e. /(. SITE AREA : fi ,SaoO' BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .---- IMPACT REVIEW NONL MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare :__'_ 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1 15 ) Energy : K 16 ) Utilities : X , 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : r COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI_) DOS More Information ___ Reviewed by : _ -;i C 2t,?2 L__ l itle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Comments due : 3/7/Pj ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - pl9 - gl APPLICATION No(s ) . ?- /,= g/asp—' 4/4 PROPONENT : Phodcock tfr. ,pit yii/ PROJECT TITLE : gjb e5',//e- -5 1 G pG' r Brief Description of Project : a07,es7tj,,r- /'eso,teCorso Q io4- 5-7x.c(ez eript 'Y r D/7 v.. i r Alpo ge-k le F 740 fer vee e Gt n eK i 5 41 C LOCATION : fa 3 Pe',/y Ave. R. SITE AREA : f ,—470prCie" BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ...— IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : y- 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : L/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : - _ o e traffic impacts : LAHI ii. itii Vc ' ;a a Y feral 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : C= 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : cc . -r _ title : • Date : 15 r I FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 42-W l Comments due : 3/Y1g/ PE VIRO IP1//ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - e/! - __ APPLICATION No (s ) . 1?-40/25- / % 51-- Q/C / PROPONENT : ModeoCh _6(1. AtVic/ PROJECT TITLE : t4:AO4Ye7 -,91 k//1L Brief Description of Project : QJcs,t1a•,r , of e ,.• IQ; tt.t (4°'hr•n.! i'rr .t,1Q ,. :dd` ei 7 lers..•.,o 4n eKis cIiitr`C_ LOCATION : /a 3 /'e//y e. A'. SITE AREA : fi .5'popg BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .--- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : t/ 3) Water & water courses : r 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : c/ 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( IIE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : c/ COMMENTS : 1 Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 5 ( litle : Z 2--rDate : 87 FORM: ERC-06 circulated : Comments due :yl/ 3/7191 E\VIROI HENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - OIL - gi APPLICATION No (s ) . P-D/S - V $ 5j4-- Qg 7 PROPONENT : AaeoCk/lam". At.Wei PROJECT TITLE : gbi e... efZ-- r Brief Description of Project : P6,7,e5f ,,-- r«.1metcra,.., 4 61Q- Cr cX'cc•a QP!'',•V D/7v.. r .c to • 4r+ eKr's 1,c livtr LOCATION : /a 3 Pet7y 4-,.p. N. SITE AREA : f .5-0p0 BUILDING AREA (gross) - -- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : r IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : q) Plant life : il/.; 5 ) Animal life : t( 6) Noise : f 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : J 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : f 4 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health . r 18) Aesthetics: V 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : v / r 1 COMMENTS : Recommendation : 1 DOS More Information Reviewed by : l itle : - //-'f- /tis/'X_7c-r/c_ Date 2 FORM: ERC-06 1 Lou -ry Date circulated : 47-1 Ql Comments due : tW ENVIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - O f - g1 APPLICATION No (s ) . ?-D/-$'- g/ £' 516-- Ql4 egi PROPONENT : 14Oodnock, Or. ,Q,y,i PROJECT TITLE : AlLt. :0,4 )4/46- 4S 0-eyity, pu,' Brief Description of Project : K'fh,cs7f ir- re• rt+' i- T-tra j4.62 1140/0 7V011<r 130t•-k 'Hitt /10lerUleean eKis417CIincc LOCATION : fa 3 Pel/Y Aft,. R. SITE AREA : f „ ey,g9 ; 15' BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .--- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : v/ 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : r 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : v/ 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : ; D SI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 4 title : U `W) CNi:- Sd rC- Date : `A/44 I FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Zp..1 / Comments due : 36//ccl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 017 - g1 APPLICATION No (s ) . P-D/.. - /0/4 8 PROPONENT : "oder>ek/ Dr, DAv ct' PROJECT TITLE : l :'eil/e- .<'s,, 6f,09.4 f z-,69u Brief Description of Project : P ic5'tey- re20,« tcrer•k4 tiLO 4.- i/rtltIPPe4114011/'7gr.a,f i4r A y(4'r, hT /_afervereLt.n ex es a( c(i,t L3CATION : /a3 Pe//y Aye. N. SITE AREA : f ,500011'3' BUILDING AREA (gross ) D :UELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : f 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : r,.-/' 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : _. iAffe .X east : 5i/ k'7ri.III itr !' CZ'of`c- south : 6 4.,11'G. west : -i nib {Fzr r' /fX Land use conflicts : 44,....-0-4-/-- View obstruction : 1/ -' 9 ) Natural resources : y s f 1 ) ) Risk of upset : j/-- 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : t/-- k 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 7/---- traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : v 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : L.---Vi- 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : J61 (e Fa. A ••/ Ce 7. Ito r n M U 5 fir.SC•'v e 4, Y / i 7 /a.r. /,'rc..1`P'c -T1 i5 . R ?commendation : DNSI (/ DOS More Information Reviewed by : tre ildOnSon 1 itle : /t/4 /ST / Ngffre - Date : 3/L161 FORM: ERC-06 Ur CITY OF RENTON 7 rI6' RE7O IE APPLICATION FEB 19 1981 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY r pi LAND USE HEARING - I APPLICATION NO. 91-( / r l EXAMINER 'S ACTION '.4/iA r•?! APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED DEPAR ' RECEIPT NO.CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT To COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name G .G . VrC)c;;c )C ‹rk. Phone 22-.4 3 i`Cz. Address t15 Ft-1-LLN N . RE.NIT UM 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on [2. 3 PE-LL> N between and 4 . Square footage or acreage of property RXD o c., G T 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) L'f p,(Qc,k 2-R eu\A-on 6 . Existing Zoning g 2 Zoning Requested R 3 SocJc..\ NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See .Application : Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this forme in duplicate. 1 7. Proposed use of site Parr-in IJC."ezt... -CO(' +e & Aka-- C(4I(c.-S 1 Fe-k CJ rpe_8 t up 40 tNN7 cc -k Cock ail\c. Lin ada V)-0.2 e>_ CO in re 4 neeAS 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. kavvd c.(-04ZPny Gtro.)J N J2 ri wveAtis C4 cur cc. t,J‘It` tv\cor(xvrcu e d,. 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 3 -- w•c) . 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 0 F RF.i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 77 '‘' PECIIIIEbF1?) FEB 19 1981 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY G DEPP`k,' Application No. =(ii--(')h—S/) Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance QDeclaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers shoulo include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent D 4V ID Or. W 1 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Il5- Pi -L7 GNT #J, WA • py 42.E ' 3. Date Checklist submitted w, I 4. Agency requiring Checklist L KG/V / 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : PAe.IC/I.l(o LpT A09/7Tia) 0/U 'EQ ' x /op' L.n7" 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : e C211 o V t.4Ji-7;4 AEX 7 . 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 40112—IlUe. /'1 t :) 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : But LSD( Pisc-vctC- 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related`` to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Ni, 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: A P 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: CIO $LJ LL.Q1 PLwe../..ACT- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic xsubstructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- coerAv l n rf hePA712e/k ,. Lr5 7 YES MAYBE 0 c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MATTE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , xeitheronoroffthesite? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3- 12) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE 0 b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or I, the rate and amount of surface water runoff? VI/U. G AN1W V,,41— b G 7 Q• rrrob s YES MAYBE NO 1102A( c) Alrattoons to tne 'cou"-rse to vfloodwaters( YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water 4body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE 0 h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE 101 Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic YESMAYBE NO plants)? S. ca'7 [.Ar o,cP/4. ../ cores/L. . jS6 Q Mr /ae/L T /hnlArTr .ER1 N G 1-40. 6• b Reduction f vL t e nu tiers o any urn ue , rare or Xendangeredspeciesofflora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? V YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE N 61 b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population A of an area? 74 Y E — MAYBE NO Explanation: 5- 2) housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand Y for new parking? I_ YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Y. YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: WILL I/y N • 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE 0 b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE N f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE 0 b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE 0 c) Water? YES MAYBE 0 NI , .y 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO• e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE N Explanation : 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowled-ee e ab ve infor dtion is true and complete. It is understood that the lead ag: cy g,, w h, ayl/mny d/cla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in re ia• e pp" s/' he . list hould there be any willful misrepresentation or willfu - k •f u/lV • ,i - •n•..m part. Proponent: s gne' W name printe' a. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 AFFIDAVIT I ,borvkt. (- U cocA( .TIZ being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this _ <) day of ibbymN-k_ 19 ) , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at6L Name of Notary Public) S gnature of Own ) 1 10. J)A)c c-4L t l 1 5 PE i( N Address)f6:3-) Address) RGr-ot s wA City) State) ZZ Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . ki Date Received r T , 19 By: 2 FEB 19 1981 13 9 Renton Planning Dept . A 2-73 I David G. Woodcock , Jr. D. D.S . 115 Pelly N. Renton , Wa. 98055 February 23 , 1981 FN T cP- Land Use Hearing Examiner 31 wra C i :y of Renton Renton , Wa. 98055 eQ Dear Sir , A1 Nlyir!" O The purpose of this letter is to justify a rezone of Lot 4, Block 24, Renton Farm Plat No . 3 C 123 Pelly North ] from its ex .sting R-2 zoning to R-3 , and then to obtain a special permit in order to add a parking area to the dental clinics on 115- 121 Pe._ly North. The R-2 zoning has not been changed since 1953 . Tha parking requirements were minimal when the clinics were con- structed in 1960. Since the construction of these clinics the methods of prac- ticing dentisty and numbers of people that can be treated by a prac- titioner have changed significantly. Dentists are much more effi- cient now than 20 years ago and many more patients come through the dour in a given day. As a result of this , problems with substandard parking in this area have been many. Some of the problems are as follows: 1 . Patient complaints during peak hours from not being able to find street parking and not being able to manuver in the small stalls between the building. 2. Damage to the building and other structures from autos parking and leaving. 3 . 8-10 auto parking accidents per year to staff , patient , and neighbors autos. 4. Poor entry and exit into existing stalls. 5 . Inadequate street parking during the work day. The existing house on 123 Pelly is in failing condition due to its age and not attractive from the street. The rental cash flow situation is poor and remodeling the house is contraindicated. This area is changing. One can see the emergence of new duplexes and four plexes as well as a relatively new dental clinic on 3rd and Pelly. The proposed changes will not only up date our present complex , but will be an attractive plus for neighbors in the area from the standpoint of esthetics and street safety. 1 Page 2 The changes proposed would be in harmony with the designated high density multi-family use. It is apporpriate as it will harmoniously annex with the existing properties on Lots 2 and 3 , and timely, considering the present condition of the existing house and the need for better parking. Thank you for considering this property for rezone. Sincerely, y F rJ , \ David G. Woodcock , Jr. D . D S . DG4/lfh 1 cNDING OF FILE FILE TITLE fi - Dl5 8(