Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-047
BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE ff.. 3 1 ,6 dtedtt 0 e r3 1111111111111111111 Return Address:20010817002700 City Clerk's Office CITY OF RENTON R 8.00 Cityof Renton PAGE 001 OF 001 08/17/2001 17:25 1055 South Grady Way KING COUNTY, WA Renton WA 98055 RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 639180-0010 and 639180-0125 Project File#: R-047-81 Street Intersection: Davis Ave S. between S. 43rd St. and S. 45th Pl. Reference Number(s)of Documents released: 8107310439. Grantor: Grantees: 1. City of Renton 1. Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County and 2. The United Way of King County n LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ems. N Lots 10, 11 and 12, One Valley Place, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 125 of Plats, Pages 40 and 41, o in King County, Washington; 0 Except that portion of Lot 12, described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Lot 12; thence south 00° 55'36" west along the east line of said Lot 12, a distance of 171.15 feet; thence north 76° 09'03" west a distance of 52.28 feet to the easterly margin of Davis Avenue South; thence northeasterly along the easterly margin of Davis CO 0 Avenue South on a curve to the left with a radius of 275 feet, an arc length of 170.10 feet to the point of beginning; A portion of said premises is also known as Lot 2, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment LLA-023-91, recorded under recording number 9108069008, in King County Washington). e=:11(- N./ All situate in the Northeast Quarter of Section 31,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., King County, Washington. Whereas the Grantees, as named above, are subject to a restrictive covenant required by the above named Grantor recorded under Recording Number 8107310439 of King County, State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1981; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenant applied to the then current zoning; and, WHEREAS,the zoning of this site has subsequently changed; and, WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenant on July 9,2001; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenant described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City has caused this instrument to be executed this day of 20 0 / . 1Wt CityflfltOfl IOF RFe"Nsc s4 " 1" C7404i.4064".00/ SEAL * Jes anner, Mayor co- toN 74011l;1111IHNIINO Marilyn ter!,, City Clerk July 9,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Electronic mail was read from Cindy Williams, 3129 SE 5th St.,Renton, Citizen Comment: Williams— 98058,requesting that the use of fireworks be banned in the City of Renton. Fireworks Ban Ms. Williams questions the benefit the City derives from allowing fireworks and wonders why fireworks are still legal. Mayor Tanner commented that the use of fireworks on July 4th did not result in any significant fires,so the cost to the City this year was minimal. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning&Development report regarding the preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Committee Committee discussed with the Renton Historical Society available resources for the Community Services: Lande relocation and preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Historic Society Feed Building Preservation was unable to identify any additional funding sources or options for the preservation of the building. Therefore,the Committee recommended no further action be taken on this matter. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: One Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Valley Place Rezone,Removal report regarding the removal of restrictive covenants for Valley Medical of Restrictive Covenants TR- Center; covenant required for approval of One Valley Place Rezone(R-81- 81-047)047). The Committee recommended concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants required as a condition of rezone of the subject property to P-1 (Public Use)in 1981. The covenants required that development of the site be limited to a Planned Unit Development subject to the Planned Unit Development regulations. The covenants are no longer relevant to present conditions surrounding the subject site and unduly encumber the property. Therefore,the Committee recommended allowing the applicants to proceed with removing the restrictive covenants from the land title. The Committee further recommended that the Council authorize the Administration to prepare any necessary documents for executing removal of the covenants. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMI"1"1'LE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Request for Zoning Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Text Amend re Boat& report regarding recreational vehicle(RV)and boat storage. The Committee Recreational Vehicle Storage met on June 7th,25th,and July 9th,to review a property owner's request to add RV and boat storage to the list of uses allowed in the Commercial Arterial(CA) zone. The Committee recommended that RV and boat storage be included in a revised definition of"Vehicle Storage"replacing the definition of"Storage Lot" in Title IV, Section 4-11-190,Definitions"S", as: "A specially designed,paved, and enclosed or partially enclosed area for parking or holding of operable motor vehicles, boats or wheeled equipment for more than seventy-two hours." APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date 7- q•- ol PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JULY 9, 2001 Removal of Restrictive Covenants for Valley Medical Center Covenant Required for Approval of One Valley Place Rezone (R-047-81) Referred June 18, 2001) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence with staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants required as a condition of rezone of the subject property to P-1 (Public Use) in 1981. The covenants require that development of the site be limited to a Planned Unit Development subject to the Planned Unit Development regulations. The covenants are no longer relevant to present conditions surrounding the subject site and unduly encumber the property. Therefore, the Committee recommends allowing the applicants to proceed with removing the restrictive covenants from the land title. The Committee further recommends that the Council authorize the Administration to prepare any necessary documents for executing removal of the covenants. 1 — Kathy olker-Wheeler, Chair Terri Briere, V ce Chair 11 44.,,----- ndy Corman, Member cc: Jennifer Henning Laureen Nicolay June 18,2001 Renton City Council Minutes 416 Page 192 Citizen Comment: Bean—St. Paula Bean, 334 Morris Ave. S.,Renton, 98055, questioned the age of the Anthony Church Vacation,traffic study she was sent related to the proposed St. Anthony Church vacation, Whitworth Ave S between S and suggested that a new study be conducted. Ms. Bean also expressed her 4th St&Parallel Alley(VAC- desire for the church to create a site plan prior to vacating Whitworth Ave. S. 00-003) CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of June 11, Approval of Council minutes of June 11,2001. Council concur. 2001 Appointment: Planning Mayor Tanner reappointed Natalie Dohrn, 3815 Monterey Pl.NE,Renton, Commission 98056; Eugene Ledbury, 511 Stevens Ct.NW,Renton, 98055; and Rosemary Quesenberry, 3609 SE 18th Ct.,Renton, 98059; to the Planning Commission for three-year terms expiring on 6/30/2004. Council concur. CAG: 01-066,2001 Street City Clerk reported bid opening on 6/11/2001 for CAG-01-066, 2001 Street Overlay, ICON Materials Overlay; six bids;project estimate$691,826.56; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,ICON Materials,Inc., in the amount of$628,300.92. Council concur. Development Services: One Development Services Division recommended removal of the restrictive Valley Place Rezone, Removal covenants associated with the 1981 One Valley Place Properties Rezone (R-81- of Restrictive Covenants(R- 047)which state that future development of the site be subject to the Planned 81-047) Unit Development(PUD)process. Refer to Planning&Development Committee. Executive: Sister City Executive Department requested authorization to establish a sister city Establishment with Cuautla, relationship with Cuautla,Jalisco,Mexico in order to improve understanding Jalisco, Mexico through cultural, educational and business exchanges with Cuautla residents. Refer to Community Services Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. COUNCIL CONCUR.1 OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance Committee Claim Vouchers 193584 - 194002 and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers 2,935,208.82; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 32004- 32020 totaling 11,142.33. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee report on the Heritage Renton Hill preliminary plat appeal (PP-00-053 &AAD- Appea : Heritage Renton Hill, 00-149). The record is quite voluminous for this appeal,with numerous Renton Hill Community audiotapes and an extensive written record. The Planning and Development Association(PP-00-053 & Committee has narrowed its inquiry to traffic safety issues and plans to author a AAD-00-149) letter to the Transportation Division concerning applicable City Codes which can be or were applied to the staff transportation analysis of this project and its impacts on the Renton Hill community. Specifically,the Committee is concerned about the safety of the intersection of S. 7th St. and Renton Ave. S., increased traffic on what amounts to one-way streets on the hill because of the need for on street parking,and the entrance to this plat. The Committee recommended these issues be addressed now because the platting statute requires the City Council to make a finding that the plat makes appropriate provisions for public safety and streets. CITY 'F RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of:6/18/01 Dept/Div/Board Development Services Staff Contact Laureen Nicolay Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing Removal of Restrictive Covenants associated with 1981 One Valley Place Properties Correspondence Rezone,City File yR-047-81 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Restrictive Covenant Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning &Development Committee. Legal Dept x Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Summary of Action: In 1981,the Council approved a rezone of the One Valley Place property from General-Single Family(CG1)to Public Use District(P-1)Zoning, subject to the applicant's filing of a restrictive covenant. The covenant required that: 1. Development of the site be limited to a Planned Unit Development subject to the City's Planned Unit Development Regulations. The property has since been rezoned into Commercial Office(CO)as part of the 1993 citywide zoning update.The current property owner,Valley Medical Center,has requested removal of the covenant pursuant to City Policy No.400-13 which establishes a formal process allowing the original decision-making body to evaluate relevance restrictive covenants and,if no low relevant,to remove or mod ifythe covenants.The current Planned Unit Development(PUD) regulations do no permit commercially-zoned PUD projects. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve the request to remove the restrictive covenant agendabill.doc 111, CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 5, 2001 TO: Dan Clawson, President City Council Members VIA:Mayor Tanner _ FROM: Gregg Zimmerm , Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Request to Remove Restrictive Covenants-Valley Medical Center/One Valley Place ISSUE: The applicant/property owner,Valley Medical Center, requests that the City Council authorize the removal of restrictive covenants imposed on the subjectsite per Rezone File No.R- 047-81. The property was rezoned in 1981 from General-Single Family(G-1)to Public Use District(P-1)subject to recording of a restrictive covenant The restrictive covenant had only one requirement that future development of the site be subject to the Planned Unit Development PUD) Review Process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council approve the request to remove the restrictive covenant BACKGROUND: Both the Comprehensive Plan Designation and the Zoning for the subjectsite have been substantially changed since the covenant was originally required. Additionally,underthe current Planned Unit Development(PUD)regulations,this process is only available for residentially- zoned sites. Since the subject site is now zoned commercial(CO), if the covenants are not removed, the site would be unable to develop without substantial changes to the PUD regulations. CONCLUSION: The removal of the restrictive covenantswould allowthe subject property to develop underthe same requirements imposed on any other development in the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. The covenant is no longer relevant to present conditions surrounding the subject site and the current Planned Unit Development process is not permissible for commercial development. U:Issuepaper-covenants fir, .. .. 0-- yaj iir M.. 4-O.7-e1 4 t` t• , One Valle, Place Properties I` VI l 33 II t S01A33' • Main " NW DECLARATION IN RCSTRICTIYE COVENANiS SS! AVG SKI G ar f WHEREAS, Rleha. M. Lomas, a single man, Dean M. Rocks . and his • ife Frances A. Rockey, Daryl R. Connell and his. wife Michele M. Connell, and Harvey W. Williams and zc%eit his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams are the owners of the following teal eroprrty in the City of Renton, Cottty of King. State of Washington, described as follows: r P. r The West half of the NEI of the SW/ of the NEl, less roads; and the East 1ems: 1 half of the NWZ of the SW/ of the NE! less roads; and that portion of the yr., • O` North 3 of the South 1 of the South 3 of the Northeast 1 of Section 31.r. _ ": tTownship 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; tying West of County Road No. 80, 1.1 1-: O known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the South 133.00 fret of the East 7. 327.50 feet; AND EXCEPT the. North 133.00 feet of the Cast 310 feet thereof; v •;., AND EXCEPT that portion condemned for Primary State Highway No. 5, South ati [`. O 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456;CO y: kW SUBJECT TO Condemnation by the Stat^ of Washington of right of access to State Highway and of light, view and air, by decree entered in King County r:•Superior Court Cause No. 573456. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property,"t desire to impose the following_restrictive covenants running with the land as to t 5•' az: use, present and future, of the property: lea NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose g`'G 1` restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land AT hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, 1 t' ?< heirs and assigns, as follows: t iTi•.;• DEVELOPMENT A Development on the subject site shall be limited to a Planned Unit Development through regulations established in the PUD Ordinance. City of Renton. P :: DURATION 1 : : j These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any Ok %. time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the t Hi. Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further i • 1 , 's' documentation, j i ' fq ; • Proper legal procedures in The Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining tub,ject property who j are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. ,l ik y Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne j t t by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a 1 t.1 judgment in such action. t i i 4 f Cs-r"•s-sue! 4J c i/ r v Richard Is'. Lomas Dean M. Rocket' •i A f f Cl • !1 A ".t ", . o- ";- Daryl ; Conne t Frances A. Rocker t s•• Michele M. Connell I 1 t i.. t: Y'' 4.• .• i • j • rid j s t : y-ir,i.`}t.`i',.ri,: i 0 : 4s II is i l+ Z rJ r. F 1' v A STATE Of WASHINGTON) o ..:1„ COUNi1 OF AIHG ) r: ii r 1 i w.. 0n chit Z day Of (.4.....A...14. I9(.•(r . t•t(i•re r•r prrsonoII 1 aty.eared Richard M. E,•rjs, Dean Mt R•,c el and his wile FrAnces A. R.,(krv, ai 1'yOa f .".';:: Connell and his wife Michele M. Connell. the persons who executed the within and 1".` foregoing instrument. and acknowledged said instrument to he the free and voluntary yt ict and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal t? the day and year first above written. e' •(It+,•.0 a.A--{ if f.._.lam-1- f.t f`•Tf 1Y/L i i s, - Notary Public in and for the ;fate ti art ^ of Washington. residing in izaa„.,tis.i T'h t ., l:•, //. flier..( r r r ,Harvey W. Williams- Mary rrilr DorothyIliams n1 o:L P., STATE OF WASHINGTON) 3 a)+ COUNTY OF KING ) I ra; sue. r On this 1dj11 day of July 19 Nl, before me personally 1 appared Harvey W. Williams and his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams, the Persons-', iw who executed the within and foregoing instrument to be the free and voluntary act i and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. O:IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offic:21 1 t, seal the day and year first above written. r Y't i ACifF:,_•t !:. ,r,`•.)(.1. .. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton 4 1 1F1 fy l n FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF i OF'ItS OF THE CITY ClflL Ei-iht if@KIClPU IEOC. t ;a KM III se IF:: !ICU tl VMS t r.,ye T...• •. Tw•, 14 r'. I t I,. lt Life' . 400 South 43rd Street I I tAJ Renton. WA 98055 0 206.228.3450 Valley Medical Centelropvi February 25, 1988 h 4.: j Mr. Dick 10 Public Works Houghton LDirector J: `Zi A,1.,.1f, r' pCityofRenton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: LID 329 Dear Dick: This is to confirm our conversation of Wednesday, February 24, 1988 in which we discussed the original intent of the assessment of LID 329 against the property known as One Valley Place, located off c 43rd St. in the City of Renton. We agreed that in assessing the LID against the Hospital and One Valley Place the C `,`_y took into consideration the fact that these properties and specifically the development of One Valley Place would be traffic generators. Now that the Hospital is the owner of One Valley Place and the Hospital is picking up 100% of the LID assessment, the Hospital is going to be paying approximately $500,000 to reduce the traffic impact in the area. The Hospital 's agreement to pick up its original share of the LID arose out ;iii ,.. 1 of a mitigating condition with respect to the building of the Oncology Unit. ; !' f'-' i Hcwever, this Unit sees only about 30 patients per day, therefore, the /' -; Hcspital 's obligation with respect to the LID far exceeds the normal traffic! /;./,,./sue mitigation requirements. Irasmuch as the Hospital anticipates developing One Valley Place within the /4': . next year or two, we discussed the possibility of the City assessing additional traffic fees. We agreed that such mitigation factors would not be appropriate because of the Hospital 's participation in the LID. Therefore, as we discussed, Valley Medical Center would expect the City not to assess any traffic fees in the development of One "alley Place whether through the ERC Committee or the Traffic Engineering Department, because of the Hospital 's participation in LID 329. Obviously, this does not preclude the inclusion of One Valley Place in future area wide LID' s. I would appreciate a written response from you after you have had a chance to talk to the Directors of the other City Departments. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call . S; cerely, is John Scott Assistant Administrator c :: Mike Parness Ron Nelson Don Erickson Gary Norris Eric Thoman Applicant ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES File No.R-047-81 Project Name SAME Property Location South of Valley General Hospital and southwest of the intersection of Talbot Rd . S. & SW 43rd Street HEARING EXAMINER: Date 6-30-81 Recommendation Approval with restrictive covenants Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date Ordinance i„ Date c //7 / Mylar to County for Recording Mylar Recording # Remarks: 1' OF R4' 0 THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT rp 0 5A Co' 235- 2550 94TFD SEPTE MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 3, 1981 TO: FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: ( 3/ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BEST REZONE, BOWSER REZONE, AND ONE VALLEY PLACE The Environmental Review Committee considered a substantial amount of information related to the impacts from the proposed developments. Total impacts from these three projects were considered together and the resulting information was of such a volume that it is more reasonable to submit it to you under separate memorandum instead of in each of the files. The mitigating measures placed on the proposal can be appealed until Monday, June 8, 1981 . 7• ICJ geed.4.8AvA- chrikopher IItri brown 9688 rainier avenue 8. tel:Y234567v in;.!118 Or RF fy Ccn r "e' ONE VALLEY PLACE b I G' ))1NAYI- 1.:nl, e Li,NG DFF PF TRAFFIC STUDY MAY 15 , 1981 A r ONE VALLEY PLACE TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction The proposed "One Valley Place " consists of both commercial and residential developments situated on properties located in the south portions of the City of Renton, generally south of S.W. 43rd Street between Talbot Road South and SR-167. For the most part, the commercial sector is located on the north side of the property, directly abutting S.W. 43rd. The residential sector is on the south portions of the site . Access to the commercial facility is generally from "Talbot Place", a proposed collector road extending from S.W. 43rd Street southerly thru the site. In the neighborhood of the residential sector, Talbot Place swings to the east and connects with Talbot Road South. Generally, the residential sector is proposed as the first unit of construction along with a portion of the commercial area. In subsequent years, the commercial area will be completed in annual increments with a scheduled completion during the 1985-86 biennium. Traffic Demands 1981 Average Weekday Traffic volume (AWDT) and P.M. Peak Hour volumes are described on Figures 1 and 2 respectively. Figure 2 , in addition, contains a supplemental count obtained during the second week of May, 1981. The supplemental count has a slightly higher northbound off-ramp volume and, conversely, a substantially reduced northbound on-ramp demand. The eastbound left-turn movement to the northbound on-ramp is much less in the May 13, 1981 count as noted in the figure. The westbound right-turn movement to the north- bound on-ramp is, similarly, slightly less. In terms of traffic operations, the January, 1981 data described on Figure 2 presents a "worst case" . This case is used in subsequent estimates of "Horizon Year" demands in concert with site generated traffic. Trip generation for the residential sector is in accordance with ITE Land Use Code 221 , Low-Rise Apartments. The probable trip generation rates will conform to the following table. 1110_ Th chrlstopher Brown pt 9688 rainier avenue attle washingten td:7234567 9811 ti I V. S . R. 167 I v S 6CDD O v: r-, w 0 U rc ro w m b a° jf/bD o 4) wPI° 1:)A l 9 o 232D E, d 26'l-157%. S . W. 43rd St. i.9 W you yl)1 ADD p 6 S D J/gf SITE 0it yli6°D Source: City of Renton and Consultant field studies FIGURE 1 christopher brown p 1981 Average Weekday Traffic 9688 rainier avenue . tel:72 4356ashln`t 1n18j Commercial Area The proposed commercial sector will consist of 140 ,000 g.s. f. 140 k.s. f. ) leasable area. The anticipated construction schedule is: TABLE I Commercial Sector Schedule 1982 20 k.s.f. 1983 40 k.s.f. 1984 40 k.s.f. 1985 40 k. s.f. Anticipated trip generation, based on Institute of Transportation Enigneers (ITE) Land Use Code 710 is defined in Table II for both the 20 ,000 g.s.f. and 40 ,000 g.s.f. phased components. TABLE II Commercial Sector Trip Rates Time ITE Rate 20 k.s.f. 40 k.s . f. AWDT 12. 30 246 492 A.M. , IN 1.86 37 74 A.r;. , OUT 0 .37 7 14 P.M. , IN 0 .27 5 11 P.M. , OUT 1.36 27 54 For the cumulative totals associated with the occupancy of each of these phased commercial facilities, expected traffic generation will be as noted in Table III. TABLE III Cumulative Trip Generation Time 0 1 0 1 + 2 0 1 + 2 + 3 Q 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 AWDT 246 738 1,230 1,722 A.M. , IN 37 111 185 259 A.M. , OUT 7 21 35 49 P.M. , IN 5 16 27 38 P.M. , OUT 27 81 135 189 Phase noted by O. 1!! chri opher brown 9688 rainier avenue s attle washingen le:7234%7 S118 Residential Sector The proposed residential development is associated with the first phase (20,000 g.s. f. ) commercial sector. The resi- dential sector will consist of 325 dwelling units in a garden apartment" configuration. The location of the residential sector is to the south of the property. Because the residential development is expected to dominate the adjacent housing market, no other "off-site" residential development is expected on Talbot Road until about 1985 . Overall arterial growth is expected to increase at an annual rate of 3 percent per year while the project is being built. Trip generation for the residential sector is in accordance with ITE Land Use Code 221, Low-Rise Apartments. The probable trip generation rates will conform to the following table. TABLE IV Trip Generation - Apartment Sector Time Rate AWDT 1,755 A.M. , IN 33 A.M. , OUT 130 P.M. , IN 130 P.M. , OUT 65 AWDT, in this context, is Average Weekday Traffic Demand. The afternoon p.m. peak hour is the "Design Hour" which also conforms with the maximum hourly demands associated with the commercial sector. Off-Site Residential Development Off-Site residential ucvelopment, on the. basis of potential market demands is defined below in Table V. TABLE V Off-Site Residential Development 1985 55 dwelling units 1986 160 dwelling units 1987 155 dwelling units christopher Brown pc. 9688 rainier avenue L attle washingQt_on te1:7234567 98118 Horizon Year" Forecast The following figures, Figure 3 thru Figure 11 describe the anticipated Average Weekday Traffic demand and associated peak hour demands. Figure 3 is the 1982-83 Average Weekday Demand and incorp- orates an overall 3 percent per year annual arterial growth rate in concert with traffic generated by the proposed development. The proposed development, in this case, in- cludes the complete residential sector and the first phase of the commercial sector. Figure 4 is the associated peak hour demand. On completion of this phase , adequate traffic conditions will prevail given minor modifications to S.W . 43rd Street between SR-167 and Talbot Place. (See capacity calculations) The Washington State Department of Transportation has indi- cated that a traffic signal is scheduled for installation at the northbound off-ramp intersection of S.W. 43rd . An appropriate mitigating measure to accommodate peak hour demands expected in the 1982-83 biennium includes the construction of an additional westbound lane on the north side of S.W. 43rd Street between Talbot Place and the SR-167 northbound on-ramp. Minor signal revisions can be instituted at the traffic signal situated on S .W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road South. Generally, signal revisions would only include modest changes in timing. In concert with signal timing changes at the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street, the City of Renton should consider removing the "raised channelization" in order to allow longer queues to form on the west leg, left-turn pocket. Figures 5 and 6 describe the 1983-84 Average Weekday Traffic and Directional Design Hourly volumes, respectively. The data of Figures 5 and 6 assumes the completion of the resi- dential sector and the first two phases of the commercial area . The commercial sector, in this time frame, will amount to a total of 60,000 g.s.f. For design purposes, peak hour outbound/inbound left-turns to Talbot Place from S.W. 43rd Street are prohibited . Accordingly, demands associated with these movements are transferred to the collector road, Talbot Place and to Talbot Road South. chrikopher brown 9688 rainier avenue . scatUe wabhin ton tel:7234567 6118 _,} 4 S . R. 167 O • 2- 13 ro o o 1 l52 f y H 113a 41-(-Q S . W. 43rd St. y0a5 F24120 Y2575- 7 96" 7/yoyB fZ/D SITE Data described projected AWDT on completion of the residential sector and first phase (20, 000gsf) of the commercial sector. FIGURE 3 christopher brown p 1982-83 A.W.D.T. 9688 rainier avenue s. scattle washin ton Le1:7234567 g98118 ra H 1- 3CCoaaCu N LJ 11 O a C) ttr o- I D a) a 0 0 w T w w w 17 r{ y ow Wa0H• a x 0hid0. n '0 (aD H, a I-. PI H rtH cn a n K H O H• (D O () C rt C• D N N N cn o n a 0 C y a t w• a0o (n D H cn N rn G rt 0 q07 hil 0 11( n CD 13 1 !k j2 3 o l 1k2,?.?H. zgI o ft 11 lee) A .9y9, S . W. 43rd St 2 Yr2 2 6.,} ! gZ S"7 I F7/ l2, i 7 ef,e,.70` 15r 2 6/ 3._ t 8r/g7I 51 / zSs C)p ) g o Y si Commercial Area zS- 27o f,, !' 6 EA $g_ Ry LLD SITE--- 1 5% 24' J c Residential rea x d// rD I 1 S. R. 167 Co7R° i 1 ro ro 1 0 a a)v: r-1 v U U ro a o Cu B b W AQ 0 6l Y7° S . W. 43rd St. im 16700 I 2Y770 Z2 d Z z 1 YS-a 0° 14I. C 112‘2- SITE 900 4,G gp Data describes projected AWDT on completion of the residential sector and the first 2 phases 60, 000gsf) commercial facilities. FIGURE 5 1983-84 A.W.D.T. chrkopher Brown pe. 9688 rainier avenue . attle Wabhin en Lela 7234567 811 i 1 t ‘CIA b M n i 4 jc hkClel qt, 0.1 Talbot Road S. I ter o 0 C(s1" 41'N\ ( 11 Is( Ct. CI N R,1 irct; 0 N. c„ 4 Kr; c, r•14, Q Talbot P1 . t: O e- c .,__, u p ro a Data describes design ro o h hour volumes on completion r,go m of the residential sector and first two phases of kt coy commercial facilities. Data includes annual overall growth. 4 IN. 0 Copn r a 4401 it mig------ S. R. 167 N_.o. W likfl JL 14*5- E. Valley Rd. T C ..,cio ram N 41 y` FIGURE 6 Christopher Brown pe. 1983-84 Directional Design v 9688 rainier avenue a Hourly Volumes 4`'scatile washinQion tel:7234567 98118 On completion of this development, Talbot Road South traffic operations will need, modification. Typically, such modifi- cations would be the re-stiping of both the south leg northbound) and the north leg (southbound) to provide for separate left-turn lanes. Traffic operations at S.W. 43rd Street and the northbound off-ramp, even with signalization, will be deficient. Such deficiency is based on the relatively large left-turn demand . However, as noted earlier in this report, the left-turn demand onto the northbound on-ramp from S.W.43rd Street may be reduced by this time frame. Figures 7 thru 11 are the principal concern with respect to the re-zone request. Accordingly, individual components are presented separately in order to document the various elements and their contributions to the traffic stream. Figure 7 is the 1985-86 Average Weekday Traffic volume based on an overall 3 percent per year compound growth rate and excludes the proposed development and adjacent developments. In other words, Figure 7 is the expected growth on the arterial and highway facilities in the absence of either the proposed project or nearby developments. Figure 8 describes the three principal components associated with the immediate area. These are : 1 . Proposed development, residential sector 2 . Proposed development, commercial sector 3. Adjacent residential developments. For planning purposes, the adjacent residential developments are assumed to lie to the south of the site and interface directly with Talbot Road South. Figure 8 is, accordingly, a schematic representation of the three separate components. Figure 9 presents the hourly demands associated with the three components discussed above , described in terms of their total daily demand as noted in the preceeding figure, Figure 8 . Figure 9 is, essentially, the hourly "contribution" from both the proposed development and the adjacent residential development. Again, left-turn prohibitions are assumed to be in force at S.W. 43rd Street and Talbot Place. Thus , heavy left-turn demands are portrayed on Talbot Road South northbound) at its intersection with S.W. 43rd. Christopher brown p e. 8 rainier avenue L . attle washin8ton tel:7234567234567 S . R. 167 b ro 0 v v v ro U o a tf W o o 3aa I6 lc Yip S . W. 43rd St. Y26.2 36'/0 Y-98/0 qs 3d 1-t32 p 58ga G SITE 1: C6° FIGURE 7 chrikopher brown 1985-86 A.W.D.T. 88 rainier avenue 6. Without Developments wattle wabhin•ton te1:7234567 118 t . S. R. 167 b 0 x 1 w v; 0 ro b b W 310 0 e1 0 (/ 29) f o 2r7. A A [6 9] ro 377I 1- E H r3V2 S . W. 43rd St. 17 .) 160 830 12'/0 70 1-4 66 074) 1 oc1) Y77) 6/) 9] 1.5'191 i nl7 r 2CJ giv) jai t) id)37] i3,27 C SITE 085- W7 pc) 3S 3,'. Daily Demand, by Components Elr373, rii40 j XXX On-site, residential xxx) On-site, commercial xXxJ Adjacent, residential L23] FIGURE 8 Chri opher frown pc. On-site & Adjacent Developments 9688 rainier avenue . ; Daily Generated Traffic creattle Wa hitic t etl 1e1:7234567 II 1 t'A, c-k cc' 2) I a N CI Z Talbot Road S. fT T- 9. I lorczON ci N hN as rd a) O fa 4i Talbot P1. r. m O ro a Data describes site and o w off-site facilities d 1 v H hourly demand that will m N m be added to the peak 0 hour traffic stream. 3 U Total site is completed: residential and 140 ksf u; commercial. Off-site l; includes 215 dwelling T'i) units. oil p 0 \ r mig--- --_— S. R. 16 7 cr- D 13— ) li‘ ‘.. E. Valley Rd. T T 0Op r... 0 FIGURE 9 ig- chi opher blown p Site & Adjacent Developments 968 rainier avenue . Design Hourly Demands attic wa hinQQLon Itel:7234567 g811 I Figures 10 and 11 respectively portray the 1985-86 daily and peak hour demands. In order to accommodate the expected growth along S.W. 43rd Street and the proposed development and adjacent developments, freeway ramp capacity has been enhanced by the implementation of a "loop ramp" . The purpose of the loop ramp is to remove eastbound left-turning vehicles from the traffic stream on S.W. 43rd Street at the SR-167 northbound on-ramp. By removing these vehicles (left-turning) from the traffic stream, the ramp intersection at S.W. 43rd Street has a substantially enhanced capacity. The principal mitigating measure associated with this time frame (1985-86) is the construction of the "loop ramp". The intersection of Talbot Road South at S.W. 43rd Street can function (see capacity analysis) given modification to signal phasing and, in addition, modifications to pavement markings on Talbot Road South. Because left-turns are prohibited at Talbot Place and S.W. 43rd Street, the City of Renton may wish to consider alter- native traffic operations. Such alternative operations would include, naturally, the implementation of left-turn movements at Talbot Place through appropriate signalization. By allowing left-turn movements at Talbot Place, improved traffic operations can be expected at Talbot Road South at S.W. 43rd Street. With respect to internal circulation, the continuity of Talbot Place from S.W. 43rd Street thru the site and easterly to Talbot Road South is assumed. This, allows traffic to divert from the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street at Talbot Road South, thru the project site , and thence to Talbot Road South thereby passing the potential bottleneck at Talbot Raod South and S.W. 43rd Street. Other mitigating measures that can be incorporated with the project are those associated with reduced traffic demand - typically by converting a portion of the commercial space to hotel/motel uses -- and the implementation of signalization at Talbot Place and S.W. 43rd Street in order to provide full access , namely left-turn movements. The signalization at Talbot Place and S.W. 43rd Street is also proposed in order to allow pedestrian operations across S.W. 43rd Street between the commercial office space in the proposed development and the Valley General Hospital . This particular element is considered appropriate since the commercial sector may be associated with the Valley General Christopher brown 88 rainier avenue y, sallle wabhinon ter 7234567 81 l8_ S . R. 167 C Nro 0 a a)v: 1 a) ro ro b p a c. w p° 337o A -,7gi° ro ra El p b ix, 2y070 S . W. 43rd St. t 1 y U 3S74/ ) 7g9 gb5° g81'9 SITE I g4" 60 FIGURE 10 C chriktopher rovc'n p. .` 1985-86 A.W. D.T. 9688 rainier ',tunic ,. 4vith Site & Adjacent j altle Wabh(n 'oil Sevelopments Completed Lel7234567 8118 1. Q V O I jc'' r N.,,D 1>,..,p t4. 6.....,., tcco ivk Talbot Road S. I_ Q C" N r c c c 1 h.,0 nU ro a, a) CA. IN 1 Talbot Pl. c: a i:te U) M i 0 W 0 S-+ E 4 HDataassumestheentirers.,, O\ op a) site is completed along with M m`E adjacent residential v developments and an overall average arterial traffic v growth at 3%/year. s\ 4, Co f.4"2..! cc--r----- s. ‘ 1,-,.< 4---- 0 Ni ti, „„•..., ____.,, 9 % It°t1 ) S. R. 167___.h_.ely c-J 6 E. Valley Rd. Kiv:" 2 c kin FIGURE 11 Christopher brown Eli 1985-86 Design Hourly Demands 9688 rainier avenue All Facilities Completed h I tel: attle waahln8ton 7234567 0811 0 Hospital professional staff and, in turn, allows for ready, direct pedestrian access . Alternative pedestrian routes between the two sites are not considered feasible since pedestrians have historically used the "shortest route" . Summary The proposed development will increase traffic volumes on Talbot Road South, S.W. 43rd Street, and SR-167. By the anticipated completion date of 1985-86 , a series of miti- gating measures should be in place. These include : Widening at S.W. 43rd from Talbot Place to SR-167 - westbound right-turn lane. Signalization at Talbot Place and S.W. 43rd Street. Modified channelization on S.W. 43rd Street at Talbot Road South. Modified pavement marking on Talbot Road South at S.W. 43rd Street. Implementation of an eastbound-northbound (E-N) loop ramp" . Signalization at the SR-167 northobund off-ramp at S.W. 43rd Street. Given these improvements, adequate Levels of Service can he maintained on S.W. 43rd Street even assuming the continuation of a 3 percent per year compound growth rate on the arterial facilities in concert with the developments described within this document. christopher brown p 9688 rainier avenue s. scattle washinton to:7234567 6118 NALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS P/b y PROJECT ` a'/nc(/ D/rFfr`(o/f !7G('r///4/ / q 22. NTERSECTION 4/94/0 ! b -7 N•T5. KA-pi,y2," BASIC CONDITIONS 411... r2)r 9 METRO POPULATION /C -rlD 471."PMF --_ J N,It AREA: CBD FRINGE BD eE RESID RURAL ICn(I. One I C • SIGNAL CYCLE • F/ & SEC. A/C - /.-/!.C,V D. 0.a, PHASE I PHASE PHASE PHASE J F-' te---) r, r W W W W co a:. 7 u A A a a a a a 4 G/C • aro(/ G/C • Q. 2C G/C • 0.72- G/C • G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC. G • SEC st , APPROACH T.T• 0 % R • % L % BUS STOP .. WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'O USE D CD CD REMARKS• kv—elk , l 4' as`p O.Cy 217/2D 29/15 , 2Y77 sro://ore,eY- lrioet-ti,-.,„/ APPROACH F T. 6 % R • % L• % BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV s MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'O USED CD Cprlf REMARKS w f2 Q•2( o.V rSID G.CO r_g7-- f'- ' /2 P/Y 4>• ?7 a•57 'Y' f"e° yOPf APPROACH f T• C x R. % L. % BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV' MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REDO USED CD Cp REMARKS f—I II. i19 0.0/ 0./1. /!0 F jf f-0 Iz c 41 0•1y ;0...Ye yd 5-2• 2rf APPROACH _ . T= ti R. . L S BUS STOP . _ WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV MOVEMENT REMARKS• FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD Cp ULSILNATE EACH APPROACH KY LETTER; I-W UR 2-W (1- OR 1-NAY); PKI:., N.Y. (NU PKG.); ENTER DWI, BY t MARA A.M., OR COMP. (CO1IPUSIII. PEAK.) CHECKED TURN LANE LENGTHS -- D2, D3; T'RULES -- 12, T2; WIDENED APPRUAC;I LENGTHS -- Db. Db. ETC. NALIZED INTERSECTION r ZgS CAPACITY A/NAL aSIIS. f/' 7'_ 1 j7D I _ PROJECT CUnnC!/- ?/'./ PCt- Ob D'//1/ zsy ley A i 4TERSECTION `r w 4I," P l0l f 2Et et-- ,z( N y,n74 7ro j ocf Y e`4r/' 11 16/ E— so/ BASIC CONDITIONS IIYI1 fry/7 METRO POPULATION ,M/V4,10~ PHh_ 6n aoTt 17 DEL UN IAREACODFRINGEObD RESIO RURAL Circle One JJ// fll C • SIGNAL CYCLE -/2 sEC. A/C- ///!'lamn /0 0 PHASE I PHASE PHASE PHASE 4 .1 L> Jrcc cc s W W W L., co cc CDm m 3 3 2 2 A t t u G/C . G/C . G/C . G/C . G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC. G • SEC I APPROACH W T• p x R -/` x L•.,../x YUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHVMOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CP REMARKSW W- Al r2 8 S°0 /S" 6•/ _r° 7/o:. li 44 ._ '- 7y ._ 6.9? Q J/C) /576 /V", APPROACH E.T. R.R• % L•.....--""-% BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CD REMARKS S-2 4 D.D` 0./, /,rb 73 Le-,/ R 2y . y D./7 0- / _jY/ /576 517 APPROACH 4/ T. 0 x R 25 . L % eus sroP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV9 MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REOO USED Cu C REMARK_. D d 2 if-. 3 o.lC.0 s o _ y 0.73 26 Spa _ 70/ ....Z/° APPROACH S T. 0 x k. x L V. BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY. DHV E CMOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED Cp D REMARKS f= k/ O z ar A f_F Io - i I UES1l.NATE EACH AYI'RUACN NY LETrLK; 1-W OR 2-W (1- OW 2-NAY); Mc.. N.P. (NU PKC.); ENTER DHV'• BY t MARA A.M., OR COME. (CIAIPUSIIF. PEAK.) CHECKED TURN LANE LENGTHS -- U2, U3; TRULKS -- 12, Tv; WIDENED APPKUACN LLM;HIS -- Oa, Db, ETC. LA,jte4o) PO ile: 1'7/eye J' /4r,c. .rc-c-7//•11 )R./ . T if. ENR March 16, 1981 re), F Mr. Daryl Connell The Daryl Connell Company e4 c/o Careage Corporation 411 1iV'G P. 0. Box 580 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Commercial and Residential Campus S.W. 43rd - Talbot Road Vicinity Interim Traffic Dear Mr. Connell : In early February we transmitted a draft traffic study on the referenced project. In addition to current traffic and accident characteristics, trip generation and assignment, and Horizon Year traffic c imates you will recall that several significant or key pa ,ters were defined . These included: Commercial Space 180,000 g.s.f. Residential Sector 350 DU Traffic Assignment City of Seattle OPP Matrix Annual Growth 1.15 percent/year Further, we assumed that the entire project would also be served by a north-south interior access drive (Talbot Place) interfacing with a re-aligned Valley General Hospital Drive on S.W. 43rd. In order to enhance access opportunities to VGH and site traffic, we assumed that a traffic signal would be instituted at this new intersection. On February 24 , 1981 we met with Messrs. David Clemens acting director of planning, Gary Norris, the traffic engineer and Paul Lumbert, traffic staff assistant, City of Renton, to discuss the output measures of the proposal including the mitigating measures. Primarily, interest was expressed with respect to : 1 . Annual average growth factor 2 . Adjacent potential development 3. Talbot Place at S.W. 43rd - Signalization and/or movements. The latter element generally pertains to possible flow restraints by virtue of yet one more signal on this arterial . ch rktopher brown p 9688 rainier avenue . attle wa8hin Lon tel:7234567 8118 Mr. Daryl Connell March 16, 1981 page two In addition, recognizing that there were financial constraints in the "market place", discussions also involved the likely period of time for "building out" the project. Similarly, it will be recognized that more refined architectural plans suggested that the following densities would likely prevail : Commercial 160 ,000 g.s.f. Residential 325 DU. Of the 160,000 g.s .f. commercial space, data delimitation exists in that 20,000 g. s.f. is scheduled to be a "nursing home" , a facility whose peak trip characteristics are not associated with either the morning or evening peak hour and therefore are effectively removed from considerations with respect to the Directional Design Hourly Volume (DDHV) . In order to test the feasibility of both the residential and commercial development without Talbot Place, a reasonable approximation if outbound left turns are restricted at S.W. 43rd, the following parameters were assumed: Annual growth rate 3%/year, compound Horizon Year 1987 Access w/o Talbot Place Off-site residential 370 D.U. On-site residential 325 D.U. On-site commercial 140 ,000 g.s.f . * 140 ,000 g. s.f. excludes 20,000 g. s.f. nursing home . In the above, expansion at Valley General Hospital has not been included as a separate consideration; rather, it is contained within the 3 percent compound annual growth rate since, by 1987, total employment at the hospital is expected to increase from 1,000 to 1,250 which is precisely the same rate. Essentially, in terms of traffic, between 1981 and 1987 volumes are expected to grow by some 19.41 percent without considering the proposed project or adjacent residential construction. In other words , for the revised study, we are increasing demand by 19 .41 percent AND adding your project PLUS the local residential component to produce very liberal estimates. First, without considering adjacent development, or your project, anticipated 1987 AWDT was derived. This is dis- played in Figure 1-A. chricitopher brown pe 9688 rainier avenue . attle way,hin Lon Lei 7234567 98118 Mr. Daryl Connell March 16 , 1981 page three Second, considering the Connell proposal along with adjacent developments including the 370 "adjacent" dwelling units with access directly to Talbot Road S . , the following planning considerations were assumed . These represent a slight departure from that defined in our original report and, consequently, should be considered even more restrictive. The 1990 population density and employment forecasts were obtained from PSCOG. The area of influence was assumed to be the same as previously defined within the original report; namely, south to the King County-Pierce County line and north to a line including West Seattle, Michigan Street, Othello Street to Lake Washington, south of Mercer Island, and east parallel to Interstate 90 . In other words, everything north of the CBD of Seattle and everything north of the south city limits of Bellevue were excluded from the area of considera- tion. This was because of matters relating to intervening opportunities . Next , two different distributions were derived, expressed as a percent of the total, for both the 1980-90 employment and population forecasts. These are depicted on Figures 2-A and 3-A. Along with the two distributions, 1980-90 Employment and 1980-90 Population, two additional modifiers were considered . These take into account the two, separate components involved on the site - commercial and residential . For the commercial sector, it was assumed that 70 percent of the site' s attrac- tion would he predicated on area population distribution and 30 percent on employment distribution. In other words, for the commercial sector we are saying that 70 percent of the customers drawn to the site will have their "home" as the starting point or end point of the trip. Conversely, 30 percent of the customers will have the trip from some other site not related to their residence or dwelling unit. With respect to the residential sector, we are assuming that all trips generated are split into two components - employment based and non-employment based . The latter you will recognize as social-recreation-shopping trips . Respectively, the percentage allocations are employment at 18 .5 percent and non-employment at 81 .5 percent. Accordingly, the proposed development has trips apportioned by virtue of the commercial- residential mix with the respective distributions apportioned by virtue of population or employment density within the service area. chrktopherbrOW11 9688 rainier avenue cc,. aWe waAingl.on id 72.34567 9811 8 Mr. Daryl Connell March 16 , 1981 page four Figure 4-A portrays the 1987 residential trips (peak hour) distributed in accordance with both population and employment forecasts . Note that Figure 4-A also includes the peak hour demands of adjacent residential developments which, for simplicity, are portrayed as lying south of the project site and to the east of Talbot Road. Figure 5-A shows the com- mercial trip distribution. As with the above, trips are distributed in accordance with both population and employment forecasts. Recognizing that a major concern is the influence of the proposed Talbot Place on S.W. 43rd and, in particular, whether or not the development can function with turn prohibitions in place , the 1987 p.m. peak hour forecast, Figure 6-A, was developed for the intersection of S.W. 43rd and Talbot Roads . When reviewing this figure it should be borne in mind that the 3 percent annual , compound growth rate has been applied to all turning movements except those associated with the south leg of Talbot Road . The south leg of Talbot Road was excused from this consideration since growth associated with this linkage has already been included by virtue of the Connell development and the additional 370 dwelling unit off-site) concepts south and east of the Connell development. Capacity computations were performed on the basis of the above. The conclusions are that the intersection of S.W. 43rd and Talbot Road in 1987 with full development cannot function with its present geometry. It can be made to function if Talbot Road, south leg, is expanded to provide for a 3-lane approach. The 3-lane approach must have signal capabilities sufficient to allow 2-left turn lanes. (Essentially this geometry would h ave an individual left-turn lane , an optional thru and left-turn lane, and a thru and right-turn lane. ) Recognizing that 1987 represents an interval when alternative traffic scenarios must be implemented in order to accommodate the subject development, potential adjacent developments and the 3 percent compound annual growth rate it was decided to implement the project in distinct phases with the residential sector "free standing" and accessing only to Talbot Road So. comprising Phase 1. In addition, recognizing that residential unit demand would therefore be saturated in the immediate vicinity by this particular project, adjacent residential development is assumed to be retarded until after 1984 . Accordingly, the following phases are suggested with respect to traffic planning. christo her brown e 4-ato) 9688 rainier avenues. attle washington Id:7234567 98118 Mr. Daryl Connell March 16 , 1981 page five Phase 1 1982-83 325 dwelling units , complete and occupied. 20 k.s .f. commercial , commence construction. Phase 2 1984 20 k.s.f. commercial , complete 60 k.s.f. commercial , under construction Off-site , 55 D.U. under construction Phase 3 1985 60 k.s .f. commercial, complete 60 k. s.f. commercial , under construction Off-site 160 D.U. Phase 4 1986 On-site final 60 k.s.f. commercial under construction Off-site final 155 D.U. under construction Phase 5 1987 Horizon Year" projects complete Considering the first phase with a completion date in the 1982-83 biennium, 1983 AWDT and Directional Design Hourly Demands (DDHV) will probably be in conformance with Figures 7-A (1982-83 AWDT) and 8-A (1982-83 DDHV) . Capacity compu- tations are in accordance with Figure 8-A. With a 4-phase signal in operation at S.W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road S. , adequate traffic operations (within Level of Service C) can be achieved given the completion of Phase 1 and the assumed, attendant compound annual traffic increases. No changes in roadway geometry were utilized, as indicated in the phase diagrams of the attached capacity analysis. However, traffic operations are "borderline " suggesting that additional traffic volume increases at this intersection will necessitate refined timing programs and/or revised geometry to maintain Level of Service C . christopher brown p.e. 9688 rainier avenue s 8,att1e waahingLon8tel723567 Mr. Daryl Connell March 16, 1981 page six At the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and SR-167 (northbound on-ramp) capacity computations assumed the implementation of a new, Right Turn Only lane on the east approach (westbound) in order to enhance capacity on the east leg. In addition, capacity computations assumed appropriate on-ramp geometric modifications so that "dual " left-turn movements can be implemented on the west leg for ramp traffic. More correctly, the signal strategy provides for an exclusive left-turn lane with optional left-turn movements from lane 2 . Given these geometric improvements, along with signalization adequate capacity will exist. Indeed, there will be slight surplus capacity in the order of about 12 percent. In conclusion, and recognizing that this letter deals with Phase 1 which is the construction and occupancy of 325 dwelling units in the 1982-83 biennium, adequate capacity exists on S.W. 43rd subject to the following : 1 . Signal modification, S.W. 43rd at Talbot Road. 2 . Signal installation, S.W. 43rd at SR-167 north- bound-on-ramp. 3 . Construction of westbound Right Turn Only lane (RTO) . Under separate letter, we will continue with Phase 2 thru Phase 5. If you have any questions with respect to the attached, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, 4i511:E°r1Ge.%, C. V. Brown, P .E. CVB/ap Encl : Figures 1-A thru 8-A Capacity Computations, 43rd/Talbot 43rd/SR-167 NB-On 43rd/Talbot - 1987 christopher brown pe. 9688 rainier avenue a scaWe washingQton tel:7234567 98118 1 N ro b 0 Ts a a b 0 1 m a),-- 1 4\ 4., o C A td EI co W Ell'iPv . Valley General Hospital ox.L 60 1 S.W. 43rd St. 66 9D 258'70 7/c) 6 s7/) rl) Ni t< l):`;\ 0 C\I 1 SITE 07oa) Off-Site Units 6-325b XX 1987 Average Weekday Traffi OK) Development Traffic to be added to AWDT FIGURE 1-A 1987 A.w.D.T. christopher brown pe. 9688 rainier avenue s. cattle washinQton id:7234567 98118 N Lc Ti H 1 a o x m a m a a0 t' x 40M0o ro it 4: CD H u)mi w c.D a.0 3•° 2 S .W. 43rd 2.t).2 - 0 10. 7Z. 6 I' If 0 0 I 2c/. b Distribution is expressed in terms of percent of all trips for the category. FIGURE 2-A Distribution by 1980-90 chribtr pher iSrown p Employment 9688 rainier avenue 8.e att.le wahin(3ton Lei:7234567 98118 „) r- AbCS 0 U 4 x tr o m to a o x r,m x rts37 eI x 0co o,- Q aa) 6)al r fil Cd w a) El SB a)6 1 A b e S.W. 43rd or ep-- co m\ fir 49 0 6 Y Distribution is expressed in terms of percent of all trips for the category FIGURE 3-A Christopher brown Distribution by 1980-90 I 9688 rainier avenue . Population 7141P ' att1e washington 1e1:7234567 98111___,) 0 i T t a° 1 M1 1.4 x lJ 0 0 In Q En/ 9 C W .. L H M T 91 C\1 1 L i P' iz c, 41 t 20 B a2 4'9 2S Y 2 0/ 2 8 N 2_ it kli P4a 1 L 4()) Sil `` 11. 4') , tkk,,, fair"rl r I 11/ Distribution By Population 81. 5 % By Employment 18. 5 % FIGURE 4-A 1987 Peak Hour - Residential Trips (- 77 1-christophcr brown pc. 9688 rainier avenue s. attle washinQton tel:7234567 98118 t) v.) 1 r\tl '1, L t 82 Mi 2% q 8 0 1 lko8 11 1) 0 SITE 94,) 7.71. ,k Distribution By Population 70 % By Employment 30 % FIGURE 5-A 1987 Commercial Trips - Peak Hour Christopher brown peellt) 9688 rainier avenue s. wattle wa hington to 7234567 98118 1 ti Ni_ qo r Orlib S 12 S.W. 43rd 9n z 9q 417 97 S2/ Assumes project and i311 adjacent developments to completed. FIGURE 6-A 1987 D. D.H.V. a ti X N. 80 2z2130 27Y26- S.W. 43rd St Phase 1, complete 0 and occupied. Phase 2 1Q -4under construction. , 1 111 46/ 3D Coro a fe FIGURE 7-A 1982-83 A.W.D.T. K chrkopher brown pc. f ) 9688 rainier avenue: w:attle washinst.on le 7234567 98118 ___} 1 0 P2- l' 12-17- 97-la 0) 43 p 1gi at, 6b II/ i°ego 26.j s- C. N6 151,) 6) SW 28 yi\ rp 2377 62 5"i7V 23 r() /; y jo 2/2 So 09 p9 36 I l' 162 Ilk269' 69 r,a, Slr C) 2 `'\ FIGURE 8-A CD-- g' 1982 D.D.H.V. Jo) co WAG° Data includes 3% compound growth, 0 Phase 1 Complete e aas-p no off-site developments, all 5.- Phase 2 Under Construction a, .O site related residential units a-_.-1I complete and occupied. a1 O?< O O = a nT NALIZED INTERSECTION PACITY ANALYSIS 76 :2 ' _27 PROJECT 79 )1111/7!// q INTERSECTION J i1 '/ r46/C- 2./4 / a/ '1` 8 ___-` 2/y --3 <__l 7 1-4 BASIC CONDITIONS METRO POPULATION. Yam__ PHF J .C./ / 4g, . NOTE AREA: COD FRINGE 9) eELor, OB r RESID RURAL Circle One C • SIGNAL CYCLE • SEC. A/C•. ..../ c . PHASE I PHASE PHASE PHASE 1<) 1 \\._ i\•,,i) .. 4 % r s C, upWco cc wco 2 cc Wco 1 W Q 4 4 Q G/C • 0. /171 G/C • D.SO G/C = d•/9 G/C • O•/,? G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC. G = SEC. SEC. G • SEC SEC APPROACH N T•2i x R = x L • x BUS STOP _ WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHVMOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD Cp REMARKS QK Lof G LPPROACH -• ' T• 3..... x R• % L. % BUS STOP WA CHART G/C I CAPACITY DHV N a MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CP REMARKS J-7w/rf ram' sy5- ‘70 1 4‘s1-9S=s s9 a-k A&s tl/wr.•. APPROACH _ 14 T• 2 x R• x L• x BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV' m MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REOD USED Cp CP REMARKS 1v-,q--rs 2 y o. 5^4/ 0.1'1:3' /4i70 /7 6 7 7. Jso_ v-A/fNJ P/C o•// , /ems-2/e) P-S--- /5)f c.c LDZ de. c,3 APPROACH T=2 x R. x L. x BUS STOP - WA HT G/C CAPACITY DHV' MOVEMENT REMARKS FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD Cp f -r R o. by 0./ ' /- - - 2/0 s7 s-4o- 27 = s92 1f,/ ' 2 ' 4 6./P o..r° /Y70 /7(y 5‘° 4' DESIGNATE EACH APPROACH HY LLTILR; I-W UR 2-W (I- CH 2-WAY); PKII., N.P. (NO PKG.); ENTER DH v', BY /2/ t MARK A.M., OR COMP. (CO?IPOSI IE PEAK.) CHECKED TURN LANE LENGTHS -- U2, U3; TRUCKS -- T2, T3; WIDENED APPROACH LENGTHS -- U , Db, ETC. RNr\ 4 ' i(/e 4i.0, `r: Qn 0" M..4/ .' ./ !T/-rl e ns, A3:4- 72V/-f /.r 0,P, Z7" /?,,Or?' f-P/ 4. . iNALIZED INTERSECTION 1PACITY ANALYSIS I 1 (/,72-s,_?)06 --)J- 2 6/JPROJECT ` 'hi7c// W D2 I / _ 7INTERSECTION P7('rWG -1 G'/ •T1/'Cti h 9J/7 I BASIC CONDITIONS' Q S fa UA 2J 6 70 METRO POPULATION VV _ PHF woT[ AREA• CBI) FRINGE 0 B 0 sELc.w RESID RURAL Circle One C • SIGNAL CYCLE •LSEC. A/C ma /t20 G•/O PHASE I PHASE PHASE PHASE 1",_ L., m m W gr m m 10 CD a a e MI a G/C • a'l(- G/C = . 97 G/C • 1 ./Z G/C •0/C G = SEC. SEC G • SEC SEC. G • SEC. SEC. G • SEC SLC APPROACH f T• % R • / L• % BUS STOP MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV' FEET REFERENCE REQ•D USED Co CP REMARKS 1 r'- /w 24/ r 012. o•/ll • ' /o y/I) , ? "o r k k APPROACH T• % L= % BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY f MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO•D USED Co CP DHV REMARKS° i/ ..ri!i/ 2 Y y O•/C 0•/' /4 6° S'° 6O2—if/:4 -/ APPROACH T• x R• ,c L• % BUS STOP . WA CHART G/C CAPACITY MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED Cp Cp DHV REMARKS ° it,2- l$ k D/ o'/ - /6 0 2/0 60 I !e • a., >/.f t 4 w,fff 2y o-V o•y7 /.I° /6e0 Y/ f • i r, YIGL'9jw APPROACH .... T• % R• n. L• % BUS STOP Q V MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV' REMARKS°FEET REFERENCE REQ'D USED Co Cp 1 /2 s 2 6j' p.o( , o/f /6 62/6 sv 6• /tfF- NA1 29 4/ a•/6 B• a° yPs DESIGNATE EACH APPROACH BY LETTER; I-W OR 2-W (1- OR 2-WAY); PKi..., N.P. (NO PKG.); ENTER OH"e BY t MARK A.M., OR COMP. (COMPOSIIE PLAK.) TURN LANE LENGTHS -- 02, D3; TRUCKS -- T2, T3; WIDENED APPROACH LENGTHS -- U•, Db, ETC. CHECKED Z:J r j 74 j 4f, J Z. u/ on,f,/frl /Dh •1 GNALIZED INTERSECTION APACITY ANALYSIS r, Il " PROJECT Corint// c I (/l?2 -O 5) ZZ INTERSECTION PA/ y,9-•'e -PAW? /v '- O,V BASIC CONDITIONS I lv Z METRO POPULAT ION PHr. _. IC wolt AREA COO FRINGE OND AELy• RESID RURAL Curl• One My C • SIGNAL CYCLE •I DSEC. A/C• .9./I`M D•`' a PHASE I • PHASE 2. PHASE PHASE a a a 1./W yl la 2 (n 2 CO tr, a 4 a 4 1 G/C • 6.S° 9 G/C O .'20 G/C • D./7 9 G/C • G • SEC', / SEC G • SEC SEC G • SEC SEC. G • SEC SLC APPROACH ..1'T• •.1. R. % L. % euS STOP MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV T FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CO Cp REMARKS I,/1t/Z /!' D ‘yj" 'q o/o ,/op-Nr.a?,- w /2 it0.3 —/7 2090 13!? 3/ 37`7,43ts5/An S.APPROACH J T. % R . i L % Bus STOP MOVEMENT WA CHAR'; G/C CAPACITY DHV T REMARKS FEET REFERENCE REO•D USED Co Cp j 1'-E 2. 'SoT' 6.20 0.24 20 Tyo 2s-oe- a L .1- lev.•' /2. iP7P a.Di o•z o Vir yo 75 APPROACH ... T• % R• , LL. % BUS STOP WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHVT 0MOVEMENT FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED Co Cp REMARKS F_ —b(/2— /Pf Q•.Zo -_ 'o 'q°4/ o #v6-2‘°-/? <'2z 6 2 '7 ti/ 0./) 0'/7 rzf ' Y6 S22 ev_ f—,t/ i'- /ii 6.17 2'?0 2 9' 7° G:E. / • . APPROACH h' T. i R. i L• % BUS STOP MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY OHM' REMARKS FEET REFERENCE REO•D USED CD Cp A"-f_ y o•/1 9/0 to I) ea,, e2 Jl.-.03/0 t/7r 4 CyJ sz‘PC ULSIGNATE EACH APPROACH KY i.LIILK, I-W UK L-W (1- UK .1-WA)); 1'Kc.., N.P. (NO PKG.); ENTER UHY'• BY t MARK A.M., OR CUMP. (COIIPUS1lL PEAK.) CHECKEDTURNLANELENGTHS -- D2, UT; TRUCKS -- 1. TT; WEUENEU APPROACH I.ELK;TIIS -- UA, Db, ETC. E/ T February 27, 1981 Q Mr. Roger J. Blaylock f— \ Associate Planner crT wPlanningDepartment 200 Mill Avenue SouthRentonWA98055A, Dear Roger: Please find enclosed the additional information requested by the Environmental Committee per your letter of January 23, 1981 . In order of appearance, the enclosures are as follows : I Impacts to Adjacent Land Uses II Recreation III Traffic and Access - See Note 1 IV Drainage Plan Also attached are three copies of the site plan for both sites as prepared by Mithum & Associates. We are seeking a contract rezone for the two sites with concurrent approval . If you need any additional information, please contact me. Sincerely urs, THE CAREAG CORPORATION Daryl n ell cms Attachments IMPACT ON ADJACENT LAND USES A. EXISTING CONDITIONS This project is located in the "Hospital Area" , which is generally considered to be the area bounded by the north-south oriented steep ridge to the east; State Rout 167 Freeway to the west; South 36th Street on the north; and South 55th Street to the south. The total area is approximately 300 acres, of which approximately 80 acres is within the jurisdiction of King County. Current land use in this area is a mixture of single family housing on widely differing lot sizes) , medical/general office uses, the hospital , undeveloped land, and greenbelt areas. The zoning map attached gives a better indication of present uses and their locations. 1 . The Valley General Hospital site of approximately 25 acres is the focal point of the area. The current full -time employment of the hospital is over 1100 employees and is expected to increase consider- ably following completion of their current expansion project. The present site is adequate for future growth but it will experience more intense usage in the future. 2. Single family housing accounts for the major land use in this area. There is a wide divergence of lot sizes with approximately 90 acres of lots exceeding 1 acre and about 25 acres devoted to lots of less than 1 acre. The acreages are mainly located south of Valley General Hospital and the smaller lots in subdivisions located immediately east and north of the hospital . No new subdivisions have been constructed in this area for the last 15 years but some of the acreages have been split into smaller lots for special or custom homes recently. 3. Medical/general office usage basically surrounds the hospital site. This usage occupies approximately 25 acres with a combined square footage of over 140,000 square feet. The average size structure is approximately 1 . 10,000 square feet with on-grade parking. The majority of structures are modern in design, however, some of the single family houses immediately east of the hospital are being converted for medical office space. 4. There is approximately 70 acres of undeveloped land in this area. The land suitable for development is relatively flat, well- drained and easily accessible. The land south of Valley General Hospital , between Talbot Road and S.R. 167, is the largest portion 30 acres) of the undeveloped land. The other portion is centered around the State of Washington gravel pits, located southeast of the hospital . 5. The balance of the land in the study area is approximately 65 acres of greenbelt. Included as greenbelt is the entire north- south oriented ridge forming the eastern border of the hospital area. The other major greenbelt area is the segment of trees and wet area paralleling S.R. 167 from South 43rd to South 55th Street. IL ZONING 1. The proposed development site (+ 17 acres) is presently zoned G, as it was recently a portion of the Allenback Annexation to the City in 1978. The Renton Comprehensive Plan designated this site for a combination of R-3 Medium Density Housing and R-2 Low Density Housing. The + 12 acres immediately north of this site is designated P/QP and a re-zoning application for commercial office usage will be filed for this site shortly. The balance of the land south of this site calls for R-1 usage by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Land east of Talbot Road is principally designated as R-1 and greenbelt. 3. King County's zoning for the portion in their jurisdiction 2. immediately east of the hospital is a combination of professional office, single family residential , and acricultural . See Zoning Map) UTILITIES 1. One major impediment to growth in this area has been the inadequacy of waterpressure. Without the recent letting of bids to construct a pump station on South 43rd, this development would not have been possible. Adequate water pressure is going to in- fluence residential and commercial construction which has not been feasible in the past. 2. Likewise, sanitary sewers have not been available to those properties west of Talbot Road. The extension of the 8" sewer south across Valley General Hospital to this site will also in- fluence development south of this site. In conclusion, the improvement in the Utility systems in this area may cause growth irrespective of the impact of the proposal . D. IMPACT OF THIS PROPOSAL ON ADJACENT LAND USES This proposal is the result of a recognized need to infill certain areas in the City of Renton with a greater density and variety of housing as long as the impact to the particular area can be success- fully mitigated. The traffic impact of this proposal was common to all of the following uses. No less important was the need to design the project in such a way as to preserve the rural character of the southern portions of the hospital area. 1. Hospital The major negative impact from this proposal on the hospital was the increased traffic during peak traffic times. The traffic con- sultant has recommended four mitigating measures : 3. a. Move the hospital ' s south entrance east 60 feet to line up with Valley Place (the new road serving the office park and multiple unit site) ; b. Provide a signal at this new intersection; c. Widen South 43rd Street by 12 feet westward from this new new intersection to the on-ramp to S.R. 167. d. Provide a signal at the on and off ramp intersection with South 43rd Street. These recommendations are presently under study by City Staff and are not finalized. Valley General Hospital has indicated interest in the above recommend- - ations as it would preserve left-turning movements by ambulances . In addition, it would provide a third lane for access to the on-ramp of S.R. 167 during peak traffic hours. A positive impact from this proposal on the hospital will be the increased availability of housing for their staff. Over 80% of the respondents to a questionaire distributed to hospital staff indicated interest in living closer to their work. (See study attached) . This proposal is not considered to have an impact on future hospital growth. Valley General Hospital has both plans and sufficient site capacity to expand irregardless of nearby growth patterns. 2. Single Family Residential The mitigating measures taken to preserve the rural quality of the surrounding residential are principally good site planning and good traffic planning. a. The major aspect of this site plan is to keep all structures small in scale with their principal orientation inward or westward to take advantage of the view. Due to the westward slope of the site and the height of the structures, no views from adjacent properties will be obstructed. Again, due to the existing slope, height of structures, and landscaped berms, only four buildings in the entire 4. project may be seen by pedestrian or vehicular traffic along Talbot Road. This site plan also reflects the 100 foot setback requirements from R-1 zones. No spaces within 100 feet of the R-1 uses adjacent to our property lines are greater than 4,000 square feet in size. The intent here is to buffer the size of structures adjacent to R-1 areas. The site plan also preserves the western greenbelt area. It is of utmost importance that this greenbelt be preserved intact, not only across this site, but all the way from 43rd to 55th Street in its existing condition. A very important aspect of this site plan is a proper exterior appearance. The rural aspect of this area is best preserved by a generous use of wood. All roofs will be wood and all siding will be wood with color accents to vary the scale and appearance of the structures. Another feature of this site plan is the separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic internally as well as with the existing Talbot Road. Greenbelt areas between buildings provide a safe pedestrian access to the recreation center as well as to the hospital and to the metropolitan bus services. Talbot Road will not provide the pedestrian access system into or out of the development. We believe that the surrounding area will not only be preserved, but that it will be definitely upgraded when this project is completed. In fact, this is the type of project that can best enhance the neighborhood. Certainly the last few individual homes constructed along Talbot Road have not been of superior quality or design and could lower surrounding property values. On the other hand, this project has economies of scale, that result in a level of quality and design that will , in general , increase all local property values, in particular, the acreages east of our site 5. across Talbot Road will especially increase in value if further developments such as this are approved by the City of Renton. 3. Medical Office Usage This proposal will not have a primary adverse effect on existing or future office space as long as the road improvements listed above are completed. The development of multiple housing will increase the traffic volumes in the peak morning and evening hours but will not noticeably affect traffic patterns during the normal business hours of medical buildings. Inhabitants of these units will leave for work before patients come for office visits and likewise, the inhabitants will return home after most patients have finished their office visits. Due to the ready availability of undeveloped land, there will a sustained expansion of medical and general office space in the hospital area for the next ten years. Valley General Hospital is expanding its quantity and quality of services which will increase the need for additional physicians as well as more specialized physicians. The areas surrounding this proposal that will ultimately become office space are primarily in three distinct areas. a) The undeveloped land north of this proposal will be a primary source of new medical offices. A proposal for + 12 acres will be submitted this month. The one acre parcel presently owned by Mr. Longville should ultimately be used for medical space. b) The area fronting on Carr Road and surrounding the Valley Professional Center (SE corner of 43rd and Talbot) will be another source of medical space. c) The single family subdivision along 98th Street may have a number of houses converted to office space in the future. 4. Undeveloped Land This residential project will have little affect on the undeveloped commercial land in this area as stated earlier. The majority of 6. of undeveloped land is zoned commercial and growth at the hospital will be the major factor in its development. On the other hand, this residential project will increase pressure to develop the un- developed land that is intended for residential uses. The area across Talbot Road and adjacent to the Nursing Home, designated as R-2 Low Density in the Comprehensive Plan, could develop next. The plan calls for + 70 units in this area. The other area desig- nated as residential undeveloped land extends from the south border of our site down to South 55th. About 50% of this area should remain as greenbelt but the balance could develop under a single family P.U.D. proposal . This would total + 300 units. We do not see the full development of the above sites in less than five years. Even though the area is ideal for multi-residential growth, market constraints will tend to slow the development process to a more orderly pattern. 5. Greenbelt Areas There will be no negative impact to the greenbelt areas from this proposal . The greenbelt area along our west property line is vital to the success of the development and will be left intact. In our opinion, the maintenance of all wet lands and greenbelt areas will probably be the key to the preservation of the entire area as develop- ment occurs over the next ten year period. Greenbelt areas buffer various levels of development and will always be areas for future bikeways and trails. 6. Other Areas Although not an integral part of the "hospital area" , two distinct areas will feel some impact from this development. a) Benson/Carr Retail Area - This area will experience in- creased business activity. Even though studies show that most people shop to and from their work locations, the convenience of this area for shopping on weekends and off=peak traffic periods is bound to have an influence. We believe this project should have a positive influence on this retail center and it could help to improve their quality and quantity of services in the future. 7. b. Industrial/Commercial Areas of Renton Valley and Tukwila This area will be a major work center for many of the residents in this project. In addition, the South Center Shopping Mall will be a major shopping location for many of these residents. Due to the size and diversity of services rendered by this area, the influence of this project will be minimal . It is hopeful to think that there will be continued progress in placing living areas closer to work and shopping areas in these years of inflation and energy shortages. 8. RECREATION he on-site recreational needs of the residents of this project should be met with the facilities as indicated on the site plan. These faci- ities center around the recreational center conveniently located amidst he housing units. The recreation center contains multi-purpose room, weight rooms, indoor/outdoor area , showers and offices. The multi-purpose Tom will have cooking facilities, reading area , pool tables, and a fire- place area. The outdoor facilities include a tennis court, paddleball court, and a basket-ball practice area. Around this area will be ample open space for other group activities. The greenbelt area will be left intact and is open to the public. he off-site recreational needs of these residents will be provided through he Renton Parks Department. At present, the closest park is the Talbot sill Community Park located three miles north on Talbot Road. This faci- lity of 10 acres has an athletic field, basket-ball court, tennis courts, multi-purpose court, playground, and recreational building. In additon, there are two other open space neighborhood parks of minimal size in the ame vicinity. Talbot Hill Elementary also has open space and playgrounds nor recreational use. The Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan for Renton now has, as its Fifth priority, the acquisition and development of a neighborhood park f up to 10 acres for this area plan. A ten acre neighborhood park is identified as necessary for an average-size neighborhood of 3,400 population. Such a park would provide approximately 5.0 acres of active usage such as softball , playgrounds, water oriented activities, paved game courts, etc. Secondly, about 4.0 acres of passive usage such as trails, picnic areas, etc. Even though the existing population of Planning Area 4 is still closer to 1,000, we believe, that acquisition of land should commence within the next three to four years. Based on similar projects in Renton, this project sill have a population of up to 650 people. If the other undeveloped land is developed according to the Comprehensive Plan, an additional 370 units 1. could be built with an approximate residency of 750 people. The total ncrease could then be approximately 1,400 people by the year 1986. f Renton extends its boundaries into King County during that period, he population could possibly reach the necessary level of 3,000 to 000 people for this park. We support the City of Renton' s effort to adopt a Systems Development harge that includes funding for park acquisitions such as these. ven though our rezone process may be complete before the resolution is adopted, we will contribute whatever the charge per unit will be or parks usage. In the event that this resolution is not adopted, ge will contribute $150.00 for each bedroom in this project to he Parks Department. It is hopeful that most of these funds will be devoted to the acquisition f land in our area. There is at present ideal land available at easonable prices. 2. III TRAFFIC AND ACCESS The preliminary traffic study by Chris Brown, P.E. , has been distributed for comment. Based on our meeting with Dave Clements and Gary Norris on February 24, 1981 , we are revising our mitigating impacts and growth projections. IV DRAINAGE The drainage study by Leonard Schroeder, P.E. , has been delivered to the Public Works Department and is attached hereto except for the accompanying map. 1. d Tic v:Y4 SA i . l-4_4.,;• W A 4$1 , 4 0 k e o%. 7-... K i',Jecr4*. .•,,,i CAM Nrr ' tv, ICt 1 3 0 l'W.4119t. Valley ' F. \ I.e 11Tr el iatla_1,4 C R R R D.\ S 4 3 r- 6/143e° - i- i I k---- ' "/' i,,"..',/, f,„._'.-:,:4Y....:.:::...i:.:i:::g':.::/ W:11:.....:. t:.•'**.e,; 44:"•.cPei•- 11 TNyr f AVf . a OliM.- 1 i. 7 a I 4 , -2 e I •••••,„.... N 1--. gt,;_,...ve,i:i:iic::..:-::::;: ::,.:::.:-:.::::::=..........7.... iip, ,ok 1':i:::AMi:-..:014ini:::. ii:::.i.i.iiiiipoi .:::::.::.*:: ::: Air. ,t a r.t.;..* 7..,___i. 6_ ;1,ucta 1, iikil • 7 ttfiriy.If1-!... !:- i 441 I tote ' AcANNI ,› - r 4. f ,i12:12t-'4R,g-' I714:: n......:.--..„ .- „..._. 4,...,......... Lz.• '''-''' , • tir -::. s 5.5: tt4- : IP, . i •AT- . 7 94 0 4. ii*:4° •' 5.5ni. e. ilik 4%1,ri 3 m.'" nl..• e •-- Er, A• eil 117,4' 44 210,ft,ii 4 - . 4.‘ A • LHOSPITA AREA : c) 1 i I IrvelG1NMI i‘iii AP December 12, 1980 To Whom It May Concern: On December 5, 1980, the attached questionnaire was distributed to all employees of Valley General Hospital by inserting the questionnaire in the pay envelopes. We had 60 responses out of approximately 1100 which is quite good for the method employed for this sampling. The results of this questionnaire are as follows: 1) 82% preferred numerous smaller structures for living units versus a few larger structures. 2) 69'b, preferred ownership versus renting 3) 62% could afford to pay less than $60,000. per unit. 4) 76% could afford a. rent of $400./mos. 5) 63% thought a bank would be beneficial. 6) 84% thought a motel and restaurant would be beneficial. 7) 82% thought a pedestrian overpass would be beneficial. . 8) In rating the amenities they thought very important, security and a day-care center were most preferable. DARYL CONNELL D /mc ember 1, 1980 QUESTIONNAIRE Plans are being made to develop some commercial and multiple residential land within two blocks south of Valley General Hospital. We have been given this opportunity to make this inquiry by the Administration of the Hospital, so as to do a better job of constructing what is most desirable in this area. Would you please fill out this questionnaire and return it to the suggestion boxes located outside the cafeteria or located outside the communication center at yourearliestconvenience. Thank you, Daryl Connell 1. Would .you prefer the living units to be in: Numerous smaller structures with private walk-up -entry and attached parking .for each unit, or: A few larger structures with internal hallways, elevator and underground parking? 2, Would you prefer to: Own Rent 3, If you owned a unit, could you afford to pay: 50,000 - $60,000 per unit 60,000 - $70,000 per unit 70,000 or more per unit 4. If you rented a unit, could you afford to pay: 400-per month 500 per month 500 or more per month 5. Do you think that a bank in this area would be beneficial? Yes No Maybe 6. Do you think a Motel and Restaurant in this area would be beneficial? Yes No Maybe 7. Do you think that a pedestrian overpass to avoid traffic on 43rd would be beneficial in this area? Yes No Maybe 8. Please rate the following amenities as you value them: • 1) Very important (2) Important (3) Not necessary Security Open-Space w/extra Landscaping t ) Enclosed Parking Recreation Building with Pool Fireplaces Day-Care Center Smaller units of 800 sq.ft. Larger units of 1,000 sq.ft. 3: Please give us your comments: Gins UCEN,SED AND CIVIL ENGINEER LAND SURVEYOR LEONARD I . SCHROETER P.O.BOX 813 SEAHURST,WASHINGTON 98062 Telephone: 242.6621 February 12, 1981 Mr. Richard Houghton City Engineer City Hall Renton, Wash. 98055 Dear Mr. Houghton: We have been requested to define for you the anticipated storm water runoff system for a development which proposes to place 11.6 acres in office buildings and 17.2 acres in residential buildings between Talbot Road and SR 167, just south of Valley General Hospital . On the theory that "a picture is worth a thousand words" , we have enclosed copies of topographic maps of Sections 31-23-5 and 36-23-4, picturing the tite to be served and the path of outflow to the nearest main body of water, Springbrook Creek. Because the drainage from subject site all flows to the west, it was obvious that our surface water would somewhere have to enter the drainage system in SR 167. We walked the ground with personnel from the State Highway Dept. , Utilities Section, described our general needs, and found them in agreement that their existing pipe network would be adequate for handling the runoff from our site. They located the 30" pipe near our southwest property corner that appears to be our best means to get to the west side of the Highway. It is our understanding that the City of Renton uses the same method of storm drain analysis that King County does, so we have used their "Guidelines" in making the following computations . Design Storm 10 year Proposed development 17.2 acres in residential development (325 DU) 11.6 acres in commercial development 28.8 acres Present runoff coeff. (sparse trees & ground cover @ < 5% grade) 0. 10 Future runoff coeff. (apartment dwelling areas) D.80 10 year intensity @ maximum runoff = 1.4 in./hr. 1 Page 2 Existing Q10 = 0. 10 X 1.4 X 28.8 = 4.03 cfs Q0 = 4.03 = 0. 17 0.8 X 28.8 T = -25 + 1762 = 77 0. 17 Vs = 2820 X 77 - 40 X 0. 17 X 77 = 1605 102 VT = 1605 X 0.80 X 28.8 = 37,000 cub. ft. storage required in detention pond. A detention pond of this size could be placed at the top of the slope, over- looking the Highway, but for the time being we will assume that it would be more feasible to place it in the plateau just east of SR 167. The metered discharge from this location would almost immediately enter the 30" pipe under the Highway from which it would flow into an open ditch existing along the north edge of property presently being developed by the Harold W. Hill Const. Co. After crossing under East Valley Highway through another 30" conduit, the dis- charge would turn north and move in an open ditch past Pacific Intermountain Express to a 48" conduit under S. W. 43rd St. Leaving this , it would turn west again in a ditch parallel with and just north of 43rd St. to Valley Parkway on the west side of the new Benaroya Complex. Here it would enter another 48" conduit and flow north 1000 feet more or less to enter Springbrook Creek. If you have any questions on this, we hope you will 'call us at 242-6621. Sincerely, A. THE CITY OF RENTON0aMUNICIPALBUILDING200MILLAVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oM BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pco-o January 23 , 1981 235- 2550 rFO sEP E e Mr. Daryl Connell P.O.Box 580 Bellevue, Washington 98009 RE : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 ) DAVID BEST REZONE R-125-80 2) FRED BOWSER REZONE R-135-80 Dear Mr. Connell: The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the additional information that was submitted and has found it insufficient to make a final environmental determination. Their primary areas of concern are (1 ) impacts to adjacent uses, (2) recreation, 3) traffic, (4 ) access, and (5) drainage. .- The traffic analysis being prepared by Chris Brown should address both the access question and traffic impacts from the proposals. The City is concerned about recreational impacts including integration into on-site design and more specific methods of mitigating those impacts which should-, be submitted by the applicants. In addition, the Public Works Director has raised the question of adequate downstream drainage capacities. An engineering analysis addressing this drainage question is necessary prior to the final en- vironmental determination. Since the rezoning of the subject parcels is the first step to construction, issuing a Declaration of Non-Significance could suggest to the applicants that the proposed densities would also be acceptable from an environmental impact point of view. Therefore, the Committee wants their points of concern adequately addressed. Disclosure of this information will determine the ultimate positions of each of the Cities departments. The Committee is in a borderline position between requiring an Environmental Impact Statement or issuing, a Declaration of Non-Significance. The responses to the points of concern are critical. They must include specific methods of mitigation. Preliminary responses should be submitted within 3.0.,o.ay.,3,,., Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock, CAREAGL , Associate Planner BELLEVUE, Wt-i 1,4e vac uoNap,41 I DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS R7,.. 11 01 40611 C' ONE VALLEY PLACE Y st-° THIS DECLARATION is made this dayof C., Z 198%7 , by Dean M. Rockey, Frances Rockey, Richard Lomas, Daryl Connell and Michele Connell (collectively referred to herein as "One Valley Place" ) . ARTICLE I. RECITALS ri 1 . 01 OWNERSHIP. ONE VALLEY PLACE is the owner of the GD real property in King County, Washington, described in Exhibit A" hereto ("Property" ) .ri C;,D 1 . 02 PURPOSE. In order to establish and carry out a rl Master Plan for improvement and develop of the Property as a Wbusiness park, ONE VALLEY PLACE desires to impose mutual and beneficial Protective Conditions , Covenants and Restrictions CC & R' s") for the benefit of ONE VALLEY PLACE and the future owners of the Property. The key principle of ONE VALLEY PLACE' S business park development as embodied in the Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and these CC & R' s is the preservation of long-term property values by the creation and maintenance of an efficient high quality business environment having high development and maintenance standards in a campus or park-like setting. These CC & R' s are intended to maintain the integrity of the business park ' s Master Plan and to preserve those associated tangible qualities of property value. It is the intent of these CC & R' s that the Property be developed in accordance with the Master Plan as an office community to accommodate professional and general activities such as branch banks, restaurants , and related retail uses. ARTICLE II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 . 01 ESTABLISHMENT OF CC & R' S . ONE VALLEY PLACE hereby declares that the Property is now held and shall be transferred, sold, encumbered, rented, leased, conveyed, used, and occupied subject to these CC & R' s which shall run with the land and shall be maintained and pass with each and every parcel of the Property to the direct, mutual, and reciprocal benefit and in favor of each and every other part and parcel of the Property, binding any party having any interest in the Property. 2 . 02 RESERVATION. For so long as it owns any interest in any parcel of the Property, ONE VALLEY PLACE reserves the right to ONE VALLEY PLACE and to ONE VALLEY PLACE' s Successor to: a) Delineate , plat, subdivide , grant, establish, create , relocate , convey, or reserve within the Property, then owned by it such public or private streets, sidewalks , ways and easements for drainage, utilities and access , as it from time to time may deem necessary or appropriate for the development and maintenance of the business park, any of which may be dedicated to public use or conveyed to any appropriate governmental agency or authority free and clear of these CC & R' s; and b) With respect to any Parcel which it no longer runs , each and every owner thereof hereby irrevocably appoints ONE VALLEY PLACE as its agent and attorney-in-fact to do and effect any and all of the acts described under Section 2.02 (a) above , so long as such act does not reduce the buildable area of any such Parcel or have any other material adverse effect on the value of the Property. DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS - 1 - 2.03 DEFINITIONS. As used herein , the following mean: a) Approval Authority. i ) ONE VALLEY PLACE, for so long as it owns any re:ord interest in any part of the Property; or thereafter ii ) Any corporation, association, partnership, or trust controlled by ONE VALLEY PLACE or with which ONE VALLEY PLACE has been merged or consolidated or by which ONE VALLEY PLACE has been acquired (ONE VALLEY PLACE ' s Successor ) all as certified of record by ONE VALLEY PLACE, for so long as it owns of record any interest in any Parcel of the Property, or thereafter ri Ca iii ) Any association , whether or not incorpora- O ted , organized by the record owners of a majority of the Propertyrifo: the purpose, among others , of implementing or enforcing these 4-4 CC & R' s , provided ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' s Suc- rl ce,;sor has granted to it of record such authority. b) Cityof Renton Land Use Code "Code"Code" ) . Ordinances of the City of Renton, applicable to land use in the Office Park; c)Developed Areas.Sites improved with building structures , parking lots , and landscaping; d) Parcel . Any fee title land ownership part of or interest in any site within the Property, excluding land or im- provements dedicated to ownership by a public body, utility dis- tr:.ct, or other public or semi-public entity; e) Setback . Distance from the front, back or side property line as required for building structures; f) Site. Legal lot , or a collection of adjoining legal lots under a single ownership; g ) Street. A dedicated public right of way or private thoroughfare serving any Parcel of the Property in common with otter Parcels, or adjoining the business park , but excluding on-site driveways. ARTICLE III . PERMITTED USES 3 .01 GENERAL. Property within the office park shall be used on] y for the purposes described under Section 1.02 above , subject to the provisions of the Code and qualifications and restrictions stzted in this Article III . 3.02 VISIBILITY.All business uses conducted in the business park are to be contained entirely within completely enclosed buildings. 3 .03 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES . Other than temporary construc- tion trailers and shacks described in Section 6 .03 below, on-site tenporary office trailers or structures are not permitted. ARTICLE IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. 4 . 01 BUILDING HEIGHTS . The following criteria shall apply to the Property: a) Structures on Lots 1 through 9 may not exceed forty 4C ) feet in height, but excluding penthouse for storage, equip- mer t and access; b) Structures on Lots 10 , 11 , and 12 may not exceed one hundred twenty (120 ) feet in height but excluding penthouse for storage, equipment and access . DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 2- 4 . 02 BUILDING SETBACKS. All lots in the Property will besubjecttothefollowingsetbackrestrictions : a) Lots 1 through 8 1 ) Front Yard : 60 ' 2 ) Side Yard : 5 ' 3 ) Rear Yard : 10 ' b) Lot 9 1 ) Front Yard : 20 ' 2 ) Side Yard : 5 ' 3 ) Rear Yard : 10 ' H ri c) Lots 10 through 12 - Same as Lots 1 through 8 ifQDthelotsarebuiltonasseparatelots . If combined , for a high- ti rise structure, then: O ri gel 1 ) Front Yard : 60 ' 2 ) Side Yard : 20 ' CID 3 ) Rear Yard : 40 ' Maspnry or concrete planters not exceeding four ( 4 ) feet tall maybe :onstructed within setback distances. a) No trees exceeding a six ( 6 ) inch diameter measuredfour (4 ) feet above the ground may be cut down or cleared unless necessary for parking or building areas ( outside of landscapedsections) , for disease control , for thinning to enhance growth ofadjacenttreesandunderstory, or to accommodate site grading .Any tree clearing , grading , or thinning shall first be approved bytheApprovalAuthorityinsitelandscapingandgradingplans. b) Landscaping of building Sites shall be completedwithinninety ( 90 ) days of substantial building completion, withsuchtimeextendedbytheApprovalAuthorityforadverseweatherorseasonalconditions. Areas cleared or graded which are toremainopenorundevelopedforaperiodofsix (6 ) months or morefol] owing completion of clearing 'or grading shall be planted intheappropriateseasonbyseedingwithgrassesandwildflowers ,and be maintained in an attractive, well groomed and trimmedphysicalconditionwithhealthyvegetationuntilactualon-sitebuildingandsitedevelopmentoccurs. c) Utility corridors cleared of vegetation duringconstructionaretohavenaturalvegetationreplaced , or alterna-tively, landscape upgrading or seeding with grasses and wild-flowers following construction of utilities. Further , any steepslopeseitherexistingorcreatedduringconstructionaretohavenaturalvegetationeitherretainedorreplacedandupgradedaccor-ding to approved individual site landscaping plans. d ) Interior Property Lines Along Storage Areas. AnyoutsidestorageshouldbesetbacktoapointbehindthebuildingfrontwallSetback , and a minimum of sixty (60 ) feet from Streetswithscreeningfullheightbyapermanentmaterialsolidwallor non- :orrosive chain link fence having solid redwood or cedar slats as will as landscape screening . 4 . 03 PARKING. The following parking requirements shallappl'r for all lots in the Property: a ) Except for Lot 9 , the first fifty-six ( 56 ) feetbackfromeachfrontpropertylineshallbeusedexclusivelyforninel:y ( 90 ) degree parking with two-way circulation. All parkingspaceslocatedinanyportionofanylotmaybeusedforparkingbyowners , users , customers , and invitees of any other Parcel inthe :)roperty. It is intended that there be open parking on alllots. No Parcel owner may restrict in any way or otherwise DECLIRATION OF CONDITIONS 3- inhibit any other such Parcel owner , user , customer , or inviteefrmsousingsaidparkingspaces. b) All parking stalls shall be nine (9) feet wide byeilihteen (18) feet in length, except that twenty-five percent2'i% ) of all required parking may be compact parking spaces with alengthofsixteen ( 16 ) feet. c) All parking layouts shall be ninety ( 90 ) degreesparkingwithtwenty-two ( 22) foot aisle widths for either one-wayortwo-way circulation. d) The number of required parking stalls shall be tenrlpercent ( 10%) less than:rl GD Cy i) For each two hundred (200) square feet of gross1.4 flcor area for medical-dental office space; H ii) One for each two hundred (200) square feet ofC. net rentable area for medical-dental office space on lots 1Q 11 ,OD and 12 ; and iii) Renton Code requirements for all other uses . e) No on-street parking shall be permitted by officepart: employees or guests on public streets. f) The uses of mass transportation ( bus, car pooling ,or other means) is encouraged , as well as flexible working hoursor :staggered shifts to minimize peak period traffic loads and toconservefuel . In 'determining actual minimum on-site parkingrequirements, the Approval Authority shall take into account eachapplicantsspecialtransportationplanandcommitmenttomeettrarsitneedsandparkingrequirementsforitsemployees. 4 .04 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING. The following parking lotlandscapingshallapplyforalllotsintheProperty: a) A minimum of five percent ( 5% ) of automobile park-ing lot areas ( including driveways in these areas) is to be land-scaped; b) One tree shall be required along each 60 feet ofrequiredlandscapedarea. Each required tree shall be identicalins ,ze and type as the tree planted in the public street abuttingeachlot. Ground cover in landscaped areas shall match the groundcove: in the public right-of-way; c) No walls or fences may. be constructed along prop-erty lines and a minimum of two ( 2) feet of landscaping shall berequiredfromthepropertylinetothebackofthewheelstops. d ) All sprinkler systems for parking lot landscapingshallbeinstalledaccordingtoCityCode. 4 . 05 EQUIPMENT SCREENING . Rooftop mounted , mechanicalequipmentshallbescreened. This screening may be accomplishedeitherbyuseofaperimeterparapetwalladdedtothebuildingstructureandnotexceedingsix (6 ) feet in height, by individ-ually screening bulk equipment as approved by the Approval Author-ity cr a combination. Equipment mounted on the ground surfaceshallbescreenedinthesamefashionasoutsidestorage. Anysignificantlynoise-generating equipment (either roof mounted orgrouniimounted ) shall be noise screened from surrounding residen-tial areas , using a full height sound absorbent solid screenbarrierwallontheside( s) facing toward residential areas. 4 .06 WASTE RECEPTACLE SCREENING. Waste receptacles visiblefrompublicstreetsshallbescreenedfromviewinthesamefashionasoutsidestorage. DECLAIATION OF CONDITIONS 4- 4 .07 INTERNAL STREETS. All internal streets for public de9ication shall be constructed to City standards and requirements except as provided herein. Private streets shall be constructed to City structure and material standards , but not necessarily to dinension standards. 4 .08 SIGNS. a) Permanent signs and directories shall be mounted ei :her on building walls or freestanding in landscaped areas, in:luding upon any berms. Signs shall contain no advertisingmaterialotherthananidentifyinglogoortrademark. All signs ry within the office park shall be constructed of a permanent mater- ial , with size and shape harmonious with the surrounding land- scaping and building environment, and may be illuminated in- H diectly. No signs are permitted to be a source of light or have O fleshing , blinking , or moving lights or sign motion. Signs may ri r no': extend to a point taller than the adjoining building wall he .ght. All permanent signs within the office park shall conform OD to further requirements of the Renton Sign Code. b) Temporary signs are permitted for leasing , sales, and marketing purposes if consistent with the standard design for the business park . Text content of these signs may vary as ap- proved , according to the individuals marketing and product being marketed . One on-site construction sign of a maximum thirty-two- square-foot size, single face, is permitted on each site during construction. Marketing and construction signs may not be spec- ia] ly illuminated , and all temporary signs within the business park shall conform t6 further requirements and limitations of the Coc e. c) No sign may be painted directly on building walls . Wall mounted signs shall consist of raised lettering in colors harmonious to the building structure, and of no more than one inch in height for each foot of wall height, with a maximum height of foLr feet tall and a maximum length of ten percent ( 10% ) of the building wall length. Multiple tenant buildings having over four 4 ) occupants shall have a standard approved building sign graphic lettering style and color system, although for these buildings, aggregate sign length may be twenty-five percent ( 25% ) of the building wall length on which the signs are mounted. Unless special permission is granted, only one sign shall be permitted for each building occupant. The Approval Authority reserves the sole right to approve , disapprove, or reduce permitted sign size and design, according to the building scale, appearance, and number of building occupants. One occupant identification sign is permitted for each occupant, whether wall mounted, or freestand- ing . Freestanding permanent signs mounted in landscaped areas may not exceed the size permitted for wall mounted signs, are to be set back at least ten ( 10 ) feet from the front curb line with a maximum height of four ( 4 ) feet above the ground surface, and are limited to one sign per building. d) Exterior building occupant directories shall be limited to one directory for each building having at least four 4 ) occupant companies. Directories shall conform to the maximum size, location, and approval standards for other permanent signs, with the available space for each occupant reduced accordingly. 4 . 09 MATERIALS AND COLORS. Building wall materials shall be of a permanent low maintenance type as approved by the Approval Authority, including concrete, masonry, glass , and other materials app:-oved in each specific instance. Plain concrete block walls , asbostos board, panelized wood siding, sheet metal, plastics or sim:_lar materials are prohibited. Concrete, brick, or fibre rein- forced concrete panels are encouraged for Lots 1, 2 , and 3. DECrARATION OF CONDITIONS 5- and will be required for a high-rise structure on Lots 10 , 11, and Except for specially textured concrete or masonry walls ar.d glass , exterior surfaces are to be painted , stained, or fac- tcry finished with long-lasting , low-maintenance materials and in natural surroundings and environment. The use of reflective glass will be evaluated and approved or dis-approved by the Approval Authority in its sole judgment on a case-by-case basis , consider- irg factors of location and adjacency to other buildings or poten- tial buildings , and considering potentially adverse or beneficial effects on surrounding properties. ri r Roof materials shall be non-reflective and earth color- ed . Where pitched roofs are allowed for structures of decorative 4 trim, roofing materials and design are subject to approval or p dis-approval in its sole judgment in each instance by the Approval rl Authority. OD 4 . 10 UTILITY SERVICES. All utility services , including telephone and electrical shall be located underground with power transformers , electrical and gas meters located , painted and screened as approved in each instance by the Approval Authority. Fire -sprinkler water risers are to be located inside buildings or underground. 4. 11 GROUND SURFACE. On developed sites, ground surfaces are to be dust-free with seeding , landscaping , or pavement. Parking areas are to be hard surfaced with approved paving mater-ials and section, normally asphalt or concrete. 4 . 12 SITE GRADING AND EXCAVATION. Without supporting data frDm a professional soils engineer or geologist as to the ground stability, cut slopes are limited to 2 : 1 (horizontal to vertical ) in areas of weathered till or loose sand and gravel, and slopes in filled or more stable areas are not to exceed 3 : 2. 4 .13 FENCES. Fences (except for screening of outdoor stor- ag ?. or equipment) are prohibited , and fences may not be closer to frimt or side streets than actual building setbacks. ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE AND ENFORCEMENT 5.01 SITE MAINTENANCE. Maintenance of pavement surfaces, st -uctures , landscaping , storm drainage systems, and the like (on ea(:h site) shall be the individual responsibility of each Property owner and their tenant( s) . Maintenance shall include (but is not limited to) repainting or staining exterior surfaces at least each four (4 ) to six (6 ) years to approved colors and design, keeping equipment and material screens attractive and in good repair , with continued regular landscape maintenance ( including mowing , ferti- li::ing , trimming , and weeding ) under continuing contract with a commercial contractor approved by the Approval Authority, prompt and regular trash and rubbish removal , sweeping, pavement sealing and resurfacing as needed with prompt repair of cracks and pot- ho:.es, and regular cleaning of on-site storm water catch basins. 5. 02 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE. Areas and improvements for the use or benefit of occupants in the business park, which are not main- tailed by public entities, will be maintained and repaired by the Approval Authority or its designeee, including, but not limited to , the maintenance and repair of streets , sidewalks, trails, landscaping, storm drainage and other utilities and signs , with all direct costs pro -rated to property owners (including ONE VALLEY PLACE) on a pro- rata per square foot ownership basis, billed and paid annually, and suci amounts , with late payment interest charged at twelve percent 126) per annum, and all costs and expenses of collection, including attorney ' s fees , shall be a lien against the interest of any such own(:r of any Parcel of the Property. DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 6- 5.03 CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE. Construction materials must be stored on-site in a neat and orderly fashion. Sites and con- struction areas are to be maintained free and clear of rubbish and scrap accumulation, with any debris storage screened from public streets or nearby residential areas. On-site temporary construc- tion trailers and shacks are permitted on the construction site so long as they are well maintained in good repair , finish, neat and orderly. Temporary storm water control measures required by the City of Renton are to be maintained by the construction contractor under the site owner ' s authority, and are subject to enforcement by the Approval Authority. 5.04 ENFORCEMENT. ri ri a) If the owner of any Parcel of the Property fails to O maintain its site and improvements as required by these CC & R' s, or otherwise fails to comply with these CC & R' s, for a period of twenty (20) days (or 60 days in the instance of repainting or ri repaving ) following written notice from the Approval Authority OD detailing such failure, the Approval Authority or its designee may enter upon the premises without liability, and cure such failure on a single or continuing basis and such owner shall be liable for al.. amounts expended in that regard, with interest thereon at the rai.e of eighteen percent (18%) per annum, and all costs and expenses of collection, including attorney ' s fees , and all such amounts shzll be a lien against the interest of any such owner in the Property. The Approval Authority may, but need not record notice of such lien or the one created under 5.02 with the King County Office of Records and Elections. The lien created by this section and by 5.02 shall be subordinate only to the liens of general real es'.ate taxes and assessments, and the liens of bona fide first mortgages or trust deeds given for value and held by institutional in"estors , and may be foreclosed in a like manner as a real estate mortgage is foreclosed in Washington, but without redemption. b) All of the provisions of these CC & R's shall run with the Property and each Parcel thereof shall be enforceable in equity. So long as there is an Approval Authority, it shall have tho exclusive right to enforce the provisions of these CC & R' s , without liability for failure to do so, except that each record owner of any Parcel of the Property shall have the right to en- force provisions hereof to the extent then applicable to its Property if the Approval Authority shall fail to do so within thirty ( 30 ) days after written request from any such owner . If after there ceases to be an Approval Authority, each record owner of any Parcel of the Property or an association formed by the record owners of a majority of the Property (a new "Approval Authority" ) , shall have the right to enforce these CC & R's then applicable to such owner ' s Property without liability for failure to do so. In connection with any suit brought by the Approval Authority, or any owner , to enforce any of these CC & R' s the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney' s fees together with all related expenses and costs. 5.05 APPOINTMENT. Upon taking title to any Parcel within the office park , each owner irrevocably appoints the Approval Authority as its attorney-in-fact for the purpose of enforcing these CC & R' s. ARTICLE VI. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION APPROVAL 6 .01 PLAN SUBMITTAL. Prior to the submittal of plans and specifications to the City of Renton or other permit authority for approval , each owner or tenant shall submit three ( 3) sets of those plans to the Approval Authority for its preliminary approv- al. Preliminary plans and specifications are to include a site rough grading plan and a landscaping plan ( indicating building locations, pavement and parking areas, landscaping, any sidewalks or trails, approximate locations and size of any trees removed from the site, the location and screening for trash containers , DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 7- utility transformers and meters, sign locations , any exterior storage , parking lot striping, dimensions, area and site coverage calculations, and materials) and building elevations also showing dimensions, material finishes and textures , and the paint or color scheme. Follow- ing preliminary plan approval , but prior to submittal of construction working drawings for City permit or approval, each owner or tenant shall submit final working drawings and specifications for the Approval Authority ' s approval, including all final site civil and landscaping plans as well as building construction plans, and including any fire sprinkler systems , as well as samples of materials, finishes, and colors. All submittals are to be made in at least three (3) sets, one to be retained by the Approval Authority. ri r'1 6 . 02 DESIGN REVIEW FEE. A fee of One Hundred Fifty DollarsGD O ($150 . 00) shall accompany submittal of plans for the Ap proval rl Authority' s approval. O 6 .03 APPROVAL SCHEDULE. Any plans or specifications submit-M tied for the Approval Authority' s approvalGOPPy and not specifically approved , conditionally approved , changed , modified or disapproved by the Approval Authority within thirty ( 30 ) days of the appli- cant' s submittal shall be deemed approved . The Approval Authority may afford waivers or variances of any of these CC & R' s in con- nection with the approval of any plans , so long as such waivers or variances will not be significantly detrimental to the overall ervironment of the business park, or to any particular owner within the office park. 6 .04 LIABILITY. Neither ONE VALLEY PLACE nor ONE VALLEY PLACES ' Successor , assigns , employees or agents shall be liable in damages to anyone submitting preliminary or operational plans and specifications for approval , or to any lessee or owner of any land affected by this Declaration or otherwise , by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence or nonfeasance arising out of or in con- nection with the approval or disapproval or failure to approve any sLch plans and specifications , or enforcement of these CC & R' s. In acquiring title or interest to Property in the office park , every owner or lessee agrees that ONE VALLEY PLACE, ONE VALLEY PLACES' Successor , assigns, employees , or agents shall not suffer any liability or obligation for any damages whatsoever related to approval or disapproval of plans and specifications, and that they will not bring any action or suit to recover such damages. ARTICLE VII. MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS. 7.01 Every owner of a Parcel in the Property shall be a member of an unincorporated Association of all Parcel owners. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of any Parcel in the Property. 7 .02 The owner of each Parcel shall have one vote in all Association matters. The Association shall be governed by a committee of three ( 3) members, who shall be elected by the vote of the owners of Parcels in the Property. Such committee shall prepare budgets for assessing Parcel owners in order to establish a reserve fund for common maintenance matters, including the maintenance of the storm retention pond, landscaping , management of the Properties and other matters. The committee shall make recommendations to the Parcel owners at meetings called upon ten 10 ) days written notice to all Parcel owners. Any action which is approved by a majority vote of the Parcel owners at such meet- ing shall become binding upon all Parcel owners and shall be collected and paid in accordance with Article VIII below. 7 . 03 The committee members shall be elected annually at an annual meeting called for that purpose. DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 8- ARTICLE VIII. COVENANT FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS . 8. 01 CREATION OF THE LIEN AND PERSONAL OBLIGATION FOR ASSESSMENTS. Each Parcel owner within the Properties hereby covenants and agrees to pay to the Association: (1) annual assess- ments or charges , and (2) special assessments for capital improve- ments , such assessments to be established and collected as herein- after provided. The annual and special assessments , together with irterest, costs , and reasonable attorney' s fees, shall be a charge or. the Parcel and shall be a continuing lien upon the Parcelti 1.4 against which such assessment is made. Each such assessment, to- GO gether with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney' s fees shall ri also be the personal obligation of the person who is the Owner of the p Parcel at the time when the assessment fell due. rl 8. 02 PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENTS. The assessments levied by the pup Association shall be used exclusively for the improvement and maintenance of the common areas of the Property including, but not limited to, the establishment of a fund for the maintenance of the access road and storm sewer, storm retention pond, off-site and on- site landscaping, street lighting, decorative sign lighting, manage- ment of the common areas and other related matters . 8.03 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. The Association may levy on an annual basis , or more often if the Association deems desirable, assessments for the purpose of defray- irg the cost of maintaining the common areas, including the storm retention pond, landscaping, management, and other expenses related tc the maintenance of such common areas ; provided that any expendi- ttre greater than $ef-TD shall require the majority approval of the Parcel owners at a meeting of the Association. 8 . 04 UNIFORM RATE OF ASSESSMENT. All annual or special assessments must be fixed at a uniform rate for all lots. 8 . 05 EFFECT OF NONPAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS : REMEDIES OF THE ASSOCIATION. Any assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. The Association may bring an action at law against the Parcel owner personally obligated to pay the same , or foreclose the lien against the Property. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability from the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the common area or abandonment of his Parcel. 8 .06 SUBORDINATION OF THE LIEN TO MORTGAGES . The lien of the assessments provided for herein shall be subordinate to the lien of any first. mortgage. Sale or transfer of any Parcel shall not affect the assessment lien. However , the sale or transfer of any Parcel pursuant to mortgage foreclosure or any preceding in lieu thereof, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became due prior to such sale or transfer . No sale or transfer shall relieve such Parcel from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. ARTICLE IX. PURCHASE PRIORITY 9.01 ONE VALLEY PLACE 'S PRIORITY. No lot or Property within the office park which does not contain a finished building struc- ture (with a certificate of occupancy issued-therefor ) may be sold or resold to any third party without the owner having first pro- vided written notice to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE'S Successor in each instance, offering to sell the Property to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor , as the case may be, upon such terms and conditions as the owner is willing to accept, and ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor waiving in writing its right to purchase such Property upon said terms and conditions. DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 9- 9.02 TIME LIMITATION. Notice of intent to sell such Prop- e:•ty and the acceptable terms shall be delivered to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE'S Successor , with a twenty ( 20) dayresponseperiod.Failure by ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE 'S Successor to respond with acceptance, or its written denial during the twenty ( 20 ) day period shall permit the then- owner to sell the same Property to any third party, on substan- t: ally the same basic terms and conditions. 9 .03 EXEMPTIONS. ONE VALLEY PLACE'S purchase priority shall r1 not apply to any institutional investor , either acquiring or r-1 disposing of a lot in which it holds a mortgage interest, or to auy duly advertised public sale having open bidding as provided by rl lzw. ONE VALLEY PLACE ' S purchase priority shall not apply to any p Property containing finished building structures for which an 1 occupancy permit has been issued. All decisions of the Approval Authority shall be final , and none shall be subject to judicial or pp other review. ARTICLE X. MISCELLANEOUS 10 .01 TERM. These CC & R' s and every provision hereof, stall continue in full force and effect for a period of fifty ( 50) years from the date hereof, and shall be renewed automatically for successive five ( 5) year periods thereafter unless and until terminated as provided below. 10 .02 MODIFICATION. These CC & R's or any provision thereof may be extended, modified of amended as to the whole or any partoftheProperty, as follows : The Approval Authority shall send written notice which notice shall be deemed received three ( 3) days after deposit in the United States mails (certified, return receipt requested ) to all owners of any interest in any Parcel of the Property (as evidenced by the names and addresses then showing on the real estate tax rolls; unless such owner has given the Approval Authority written notice of a different identity or address) specifying the precise changes to be effected to these CC & R' s. Unless within thirty30 ) days of such notice, owners of over fifty percent ( 50% ) of the total acreage of the office park (excluding land dedicated to the public) have objected in writing to Approval Authority,Approval Authority may record notice of such extension, modifica- tion , or amendment, which notice shall include a certificate to the effect that compliance has been had with this Section 10.02 an9 that it has not received objections from owners of more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the total acreage of the office park, which record notice shall be conclusive evidence of such facts and that these CC & R' s have been so extended , modified or amended. 10 .03 SEVERABILITY. All of the CC & R's hereunder shall be construed together , but if it is at any time held that any part or provision is invalid or unenforceable, no other provision of the CC & R' s shall be thereby affected or impaired. 10.04 OWNER'S LIABILITY. Upon sale of a particular Parcel or Property, the selling owner shall have no continuing liabilityforobligationsaccruingsubsequenttothedateofconveyance, but such sale shall not relieve the new owner of the obligation to correct any continuing deficiencies or violations of these CC & R' s. I DATED this 27 day of OC(AP 198 -. By: 671'ONE VALLEY PLACE G L 2} zti BY:Agi=2 By r@tiJ Ge Cvc; v DE'.LARAT ON OF CO DITI" S 10- STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King On this 27e4 day of 6( C 19 (53 , before me thi, undersigned , a notary public in and for the State of HWashington , duly commissioned and sworn e s,0na .1 ppeared J4-1-f` DARYL CONNELL;"e 'akrYare'dged the C..) sa:.d instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said r-I PARTNERSHIP for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on p oal.h stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, land that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corpora— tion. pp In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 1; Notz(ry Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at: STATE OF Washington King 88. County of. On this 2 7th day of_October A. D. 198 3 , before me,the undersigned, a NotaryPublicinandfortheStateofWashingtondulycommissionedandswornpersonallyappearedLynnO. Hurst to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument as attorney in fact ofDeanM. Rockey and Frances A. Rockey, husband and wife, therein de:cribed, and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the said instrument as such attorney in factforsaidprncipal, freely and voluntarily, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the powerofattorneyauthorizingtheexecutionofthisinstrumenthasnotbeenrevokedandthatthesaid JDean M. Rockey and Frances A. Rockey are ifs now living. WIT1s1 SSmy hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and ye r in this certificate firs above written. L6Jyl1`L ash" gtonNocarPubeinandthe $ta/je residing at / Acknowledgment by Attorney in Fact. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co. Form L 30) DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS 11— STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King On this jay of 19'3 , before me personally appeared to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and fore- going instrument , and acknowledged that he/ she/ they signed the same as his/ her/ their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ri CIn Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my pf•fic.ial seal the day and year first above written. tt Notary Public i and or ry' the State Wa ington, i`' 'ti ' • residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King On this day of 19 before me personally appeared to me— nnown to be the individual (s) described in and who executed the within and fore- going instrument , and acknowledged that he/ she/ they signed the same as his/ her/ their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at: 1 4 at EXHIBIT 4 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A The west 4 acres of the east half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; r,+ EXCEPT the south 10 feet of the north 30 feet thereof, vi conveyed to King County for road by deed recorded under ORecording Number 1146648; and C„+ LESS that portion deeded to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 5 by deed recorded under Recording v-4 Number 5310544. 1 GD PARCEL B The east half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 4 acres thereof; ALSO BEGINNING at a point on the south boundary of the west half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is 184 feet east from the southwest corner thereof; thence westerly 184 feet; thence northerly along the west boundary thereof to the north line of said subdivision; thence easterly 84 feet along said north line; thence southeasterly to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to the State of Washington for South 180th Street and for Primary State Highway No. 5 recorded under Recording Number 5296778. PARCEL C The west half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, w.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of a straight line extended from a point on the north line thereof 84 feet east of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south line thereof 184 feet east of the southwest corner therof; and EXCEPT that portion lying within county road. PARCEL D That portion of the north half of the south half of the south half of the northeast quarter of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying west of Coupty Road No. 80, known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the south 133 .00 feet of the east 327.50 feet; and EXCEPT the north 133 .00 feet of the east 310.00 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion portion condemned for Primary State rti Highway No. 5, South 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State ofUD Washington in King County Superior Court Cause Number 9-1 573456. ri CD CO RECORDED IISDRY c;';; 1 ti i 23 M ,83 n-its ON ofS r:{`U &•G COUNT 1 ITT" I9T'4o UCJ t .1t T'1NtJM k rY34 Pit 0oa.:1vA.J1Mout c '..'E' F'd/ 1101"r:.1J1 mod VJ a 0 (L. 0...2 Valle General Hospital 4'Y pi sr to 400 SOUTH 43RD STREET RENTON.WA 98055 206-228-3450 Commissioners. EEO POWERS.rrvdenr /MORTON T.HARDWICK. rite-rwwde„t CHARLOTTE KURTH COOPER.RN,MN, se.trtan /JACK B. KECK/JOHN R.SHIELDS..Non Administrator:WM.E.MURRAY August 13, 1981 OF R r 71\ Ck C to 14 1981 c; CC'`o``ti z I ca Q ,c1/4° The Renton City Council 41w t, Municipal Building eq IC200MillStreetSouthQP Renton, Wa 98055 LNG DE Gentlemen: The Hospital has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner regarding the zoning request by One Valley Place Properties . Our abiding concern regards the traffic control between the on/off ramps from Highway 167 east to the intersection of Springbrook Road and 43rd Street. Development of the property will result in additional traffic to and from that project, plus our current hospital expansion will be generating more visits to our facility. The recommendation of the applicant to position a traffic light between Highway 167 overpass and the intersection at Springbrook Road and 43rd Street, at such a location as to serve the entrance to both properties, is supported by the Hospital . Such a signal device will permit safe access to our Emergency Room entrance. Also, we support the renovating of the traffic signal at the intersec- tion of Springbrook Road and 43rd Street to include a quick response left turn signal when traffic volumes permit. This will facilitate speedy access to the Hospital 's Emergency Room for physicians and personnel who are responding to urgent situations. Sinc rely, E . Murray Administrator VVV WEM/mt cc: Richard Lomas, MD Mr. Daryl Connell 1 or KING COUNTY rd • V:Zel-x..---,t-e--- 7,t1-4'1- Valley General Hospital 400 SOUTH 43RD STREET , RENTON.WA 98011 206-228-3450 Commissioners LEO POWERS. ' lent 1 MORTON T HARDWICK t,<, r„.,,,,,, CHARLOTTE KURTH COOPER.RN MN, s,.,eo, i JACK B KECK / JOHN R. SHIELDS MI Administrator 11's1 E n1URRA1 August 13, 1981 o R'//, Oq_a Tr, C.I' 7,-.. IAA.,:,_ , z._ I'U 1981 \ C: P r 1 AUG 14 f E e\ Sod The Renton City Council c;. / r,,, ' L1' Municipal Building s yi p sp.,200 Mill Street South 4,/, QP''' FZ l Renton, Wa 98055 E -•- Gentlemen: The Hospital has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner regarding the zoning request by One Valley Place Properties . Our abiding concern regards the traffic control between the on/off ramps from Highway 167 east to the intersection of Springbrook Road and 43rd Street. Development of the property will result in additional traffic to and from that project, plus our current hospital expansion will be generating more visits to our facility. The recommendation of the applicant to position a traffic light between Highway 167 overpass and the intersection at Springbrook Road and 43rd Street, at such a location as to serve the entrance to both properties, is supported by the Hospital . Such a signal device will permit safe access to our Emergency Room entrance. Also, we support the renovating of the traffic signal at the intersec- tion of Springbrook Road and 43rd Street to include a quick response left turn signal when traffic volumes permit. This will facilitate speedy access to the Hospital 's Emergency Room for physicians and personnel who are responding to urgent situations. Sin rely, fl / c.c lit 4-EE. Murray Administrator WEM/mt cc: Richard Lomas, MD Mr. Daryl Connell WI.Ei.3y/7tDf Y1Rlci =i c)I KIM,MINI) OF R" V O THE CITY OF RENTON U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 amok BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 am. 235- 2550 o9 T6O SEP1v_O MEMORANDUM August 13 , 1981 TO : Del Mead, City Clerk FROM : Planning Department RE : ONE VALLEY PLACE REZONE, R-047-81 The proposed ordinance for the subject rezone has been reviewed for content and found to be accurate . Attached is a site map to be included. We are assuming the legal description will be forthcoming from the Public Works Department . wr Attachment RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Aucust 3 , 1981 Council Chambers Morday , 8 : 00 P . M . Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COINCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE (arrived at 8:05 P.M. ) JOHN REED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; DEL IN ATTENDANCE MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; FIRE MARSHALL James Matthews ; M. MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk and Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JULY 27, 1981 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL Mayor Shinpoch presented for viewing, gifts to the City from PRESENTATION Renton ' s Sister City, Nishiwaki , Japan. The gifts consisted of two Japanese dolls hand made by special techniques and delivered by young visitor from Nishiwaki ' s Mayor. Mayor Shinpoch explained she would be sending Indian art objects to Japan. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: For-Hire Letter from O. K. Cab Co. President Leslie Funderburg requested License changes in the for-hire license of new cab drivers to dispense with the physical examination as done by Seattle and King County. The letter also requested reduction in fees, noting Seattle and King County are $16 per year. Refer to Public Safety Committee. One Valley Place Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended approval with restrictive Rezone covenants for One Valley Place Properties Rezone R-046-81 , G to P-1 to allow office and commercial space; located southwest of the Talbot Rd. S and SW 43rd St. intersection. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Corsent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke made inquiry re notification of LID #313 citizens involved in July 20, 1981 letter/petition before Council Talbot Road S from Talbot Rd. S residents requesting review and revision of Street LID #313. Council President Stredicke requested petitioners Improvements be notified of City Attorney and Public Works Dept. findings. Mayor Shinpoch reported advice that LID #313 not be reopened. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADMINISTRATION NOTIFY PEOPLE FILING PETITION,DATED 7/16/81, OF THE CITY ATTORNEY OPINION REGARD- ING LID #313 AND THE PURPOSE OF LID #313 AND ANY CHANGES WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE AT PUBLIC HEARING, THAT COUNCIL HAS NOT CHOSEN TO RE- HOLD PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Tiffany Park Council President Stredicke asked for update of plans for Tiffany WalKway Park Walkway improvement re costs, etc. , noting letters have been Improvement received from Boy Scout Troups attempting to establish Eagle Scout project. Comrunity Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Comnittee report which explained for informational purposes, their meeting Location of with Renton Housing Authority Executive Director, A. J. Ladner, and Family Housing Planning Department representatives for review of proposal to Proposal construct 30 units of family housing for low income families. The report recalled first site choice of NE 16th and Kirkland NE was rejected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development 1 Renton City Council 8(3/81 Page 2 Old Business Continued - Community Services Committee - Continued Family Housing by because of its close proximity to other publicly assisted units. Housing Authority The report explained the site selection is a two-acre area east of at NE 3rd Street Vantage Point Condominiums between NE 3rd St. and NE 4th St, with access off NE 4th St. and is the second choice of the Housing Authority. Following discussion, Acting Planning Director Clemens noted HUC has not given final approval of the site, that assisted housing does exist within the census tract. Council noted concern for adequate bus transportation. Parking Tickets Councilman Shane asked that parking tickets be cancelled that were issued in the downtown area on Saturday during Western Days due to streets being cleared. Mayor Shinpoch and Police Representative Persson noted no complaints have been received. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report recommended concurrence in the Committee adoption of the proposed policy statement for reimbursement of Cl— isrman: Clymer travel and per diem expenses for candidates competing for Recruitment of selected positions in the City. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, Department Heads - ADOPT THE REPORT AND REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION AS POLICY STATE- Reimbursement MENT. CARRIED. Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report recommended the City enter Committee into an agreement with the City of Normandy Park for the housing Chairman: Hughes of their prisoners and the Council authorize the Mayor and City Normandy Park Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, Prisoners CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Automatic Response The Public Safety Committee recommended the City and neighboring Mutual Aid cities and Fire Districts (such as Bellevue, Kent, Tukwila, King County #20, #25, #40) enter into mutual aid and automatic response agreements. The report stated rendering of assistance under this agreement would be of mutual benefit to all jurisdic- tions for emergency medical aid and fire supression situations and requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper form. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee report noted review of appeal Development by Dominic Colasurdo of Hearing Examiner 's decision for denial Committee of a Special Permit for filling and grading of a site located Chrm: Rockhill at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of NE 4th and Appeal Union Ave. SE. The Committee concluded that the Examiner was in Dominic Colasurdo error and the committee found that the drainage feature crossing Special Permit the subject property is not a "stream" requiring preservation SP-024-81 pursuant to Section 4-2313-4 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. The Committee recommended the Examiner' s decision regarding SP-024-81 be reversed and the permit be granted subject to compliance with the City's Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. Councilman Stredicke inquired re defini- tion of stream and was advised by Councilman Rockhill that stream had permanent source of water; that committee felt this was drain- age situation subject to rain. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR WITH FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances Committee for second and final readings: (First readings 7/27/81 ) Chairman: Clymer An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from GS-1 to R-1 ; property located on west side of Olympia Ave. NE Ordinance #3564 between NE 10th St. and NE 10th Place; known as the Kampe Construc- Kampe Construction tion Co. Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN THE Rezone R-046-81 RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, SHANE, REED; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3565 An ordinance was read for appropriation of $82,000 and transfer Appropriation and of $117,522 unto Parker property/Cedar River Trail for acquisition Transfer of property; total purchase price $225,000. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND Parker Property ROCKHILL, CONCUR AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Attorney noted donation of 53 acres rather than 25. For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING c a a==_ a SUBMITTIN3 Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 3, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-047-81 ; One Valley Place Consent X Public Hearing Properties Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution x Old Business Exhibits; (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Report , 6-30-81 Other B. Approval : C. Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A X Other Clearance restrictive covenants FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Appropriation- Expenditire Required $ Budgeted $ Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period for the Examiner's Recommendation regarding the attached rezone request has expired and restrictive covenants have been signed by all property owners. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members for referral to Ways and Means Committee and subsequent adoption of an ordinance. clg_\\Itt 1( 3' JUL 30 1981 I PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: ee page 6 of the attached report i i N G DEQP', SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. oY / -I Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. I;iOhO16 Roe being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the Chief Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a..Qrdin nce...SW...3569 R6697 as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of I consecutive issues,commencing on the day of August 19 81. ,and ending the day of 19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $36•b 3 which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. p_ (//p, Chief Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25 day of August , 19....01 Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at Toot King County. Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 Public Notice Public NoticeRoadSouthandS.W. 43rd the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4,lessStreet, Renton, King Coun- roads; and the East half ofty,Washington,from Gener- the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 lessalClassificationDistrict (G) roads;and that portion of thetoPublicUseDistrict (P-1) North 1/2 of the South Y/2 ofwhichpropertyislegallyde- the South 1/2 of the Northeastscribedasfollow: 1/4 of Section 31, TownshipSeeExhibit"A"attached 23 North, Range 5 East,hereto and made a part W.M.; lying West of CountyhereofasiffullysetforthRoadNo. 80, known as theherein. Kent-Renton Road; EX- And subject further to that CEPT the South 133.00 feetCITYOFRENTON, certain Declaration of Re- of the East 327.50 feet;ANDWASHINGTONstrictiveCovenantsex- EXCEPT the North 133.00ORDINANCENO. 3569 ecuted by Petitioner-Own- of the East 310 feet thereof;AN ORDINANCE OF ersonoraboutJuly24,1981 AND EXCEPT that portionTHECITYOFRENTON, and recorded in the office of condemned for PrimaryWASHINGTONtheDirectorofRecordsandStateHighwayNo.5, SouthCHANGINGTHEZON- Election Receiving No. 228th Street in Kent-RentonINGCLASSIFICATION8107310439andwhichsaidbyStateofWashingtoninOFCERTAINPROPER- Covenants are hereby incor- King County Superior CourtTIESWITHINTHECITYporatedandmadeapartCauseNo. 573456;O F RENTON FROM hereof as if fully set forth. SUBJECT TO Condemna-GENERAL CLASS IFI- Section 2:This Ordinance tion by the State of Washing-CATIONS(G)TO PUBL- was adopted on August 17, ton of right of access to StateICUSEDISTRICT(P-1) 1981. A full text of this Highway and of light, viewR-047-81 —ONE VAL- Ordinance will be mailed and air,by decree entered inLEYPLACEPROPER- without charge upon request King County Superior CourtTIES) to the City Clerk. Cause No. 573456.Section 1: An Ordinance EXHIBIT"A" changing certain property Legal Description Published in The DailylocatedsouthofValleyGen- Re-zone R-047-81 One Val- Record Chronicle AugusteralHospitalandSouthwestleyPlaceProperties21, 1981. R6697. of the intersection of Talbot The West half of the NE 1/4 of Renton City Council 8/10/81 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutuunb - Continued First Reading An ordinance was read (including summary) changing the zoning One Valley Pl . classification from G General to P-1 Public Use District for Rezone property located south of Valley General Hospital and SW of the intersection of Talbot Rd. S and SW 43rd St; known as the One Valley Place Rezone R-047-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE k WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported Brian, son of Building Director Ron Nelson, REPORT will be in Japan for a baseball tournament and has volunteered to deliver a gift from Mayor Shinpoch to the Mayor of Nishiwaki , Renton's Sister City. Brian is with Spokane Centennials, semi-pro tCom. AUDIENCE COMMENT Councilman Rockhill introduced Riccardo Bergamo, visitor from Rotaxy Exchange Italy, interested in seeing American government at work. Student EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL MOVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS, LAND ACQUISITION AND PERSONNEL MATTER. CARRIED. Council met in Executive Session at 8:39 p.m. and returned to Regular Session with all Council Members present as previously shown. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ADJOURNMENT CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 9: 14 p.m. Zt/jAl L/_/` Delores A. M ad, C. City Clerk X'111 35 CITY OF RENTON 1111 DATE 8/10/A1 WARRANT DISTRIBJTION FUND TOTAL WARRANTS MACHINE VOIDS: *35093 - #35097 CURRENT 95, 433 • 01 PARKS 326, 258 . 38 STREETS 14, 738 . 23 LIBRARY S14, 329 , 26 G COULON BCH PK CQNSTR 32, 751 . 69 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES 3, Q28i75 WATERWORKS UTILITY 78, 592 . 40 AIRPORT 15, 248 . 94 1975 W S S CONSTRUCTION 6145, 986 . 57 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5, 909 . 67 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP . 4, 563 . 81 LID CONTROL 641 . 10 TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS 437, 486. 81 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RELE1vED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NU. 3oQ98 THROUGH NO. 35275 IN THE AMOUNT OF 437, 486. 81 THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 1981 • yi)s 4VN4 gr'MEMBER • w !MI IN COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN r efr MEMBER , • • • • • • L.I.D. #322, REVENUE WARRANT No. #R-6 $641.10 ram : RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 3 , 1981 Council Chambers Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COLNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE (arrived at 8:05 P.M. ) JOHN REED. CI1Y OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; DEL IN ATTENDANCE MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; FIRE MARSHALL James Matthews; M. MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk and Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MIPUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JULY 27, 1981 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL Mayor Shinpoch presented for viewing, gifts to the City from PRESENTATION Renton' s Sister City, Nishiwaki , Japan. The gifts consisted of two Japanese dolls hand made by special techniques and delivered by young visitor from Nishiwaki ' s Mayor. Mayor Shinpoch explained she would be sending Indian art objects to Japan. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Fo -Hire Letter from O. K. Cab Co. President Leslie Funderburg requested Lip:ense changes in the for-hire license of new cab drivers to dispense with the physical examination as done by Seattle and King County. The letter also requested reduction in fees, noting Seattle and King County are $16 per year. Refer to Public Safety Committee. One Valley Place Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended approval with restrictive Re:°one covenants for One Valley Place Properties Rezone R-046-81 , G to P-1 to allow office and commercial space; located southwest of the Talbot Rd. S and SW 43rd St. intersection. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke made inquiry re notification of LID #313 citizens involved in July 20, 1981 letter/petition before Council Talbot Road S from Talbot Rd. S residents requesting review and revision of St -eet LID #313. Council President Stredicke requested petitioners Im)rovements be notified of City Attorney and Public Works Dept. findings. Mayor Shinpoch reported advice that LID #/313 not be reopened. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADMINISTRATION NOTIFY PEOPLE FILING PETITION,DATED 7/16/81, OF THE CITY ATTORNEY OPINION REGARD- ING LID #313 AND THE PURPOSE OF LID #313 AND ANY CHANGES WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE AT PUBLIC HEARING, THAT COUNCIL HAS NOT CHOSEN TO BE- HOLD PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Tiffany Park Council President Stredicke asked for update of plans for Tiffany Walkway Park Walkway improvement re costs, etc. , noting letters have been Improvement received from Boy Scout Troups attempting to establish Eagle Scout project. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Conmittee report which explained for informational purposes, their meeting Location of with Renton Housing Authority Executive Director, A. J. Ladner, and Family Housing Planning Department representatives for review of proposal to Proposal construct 30 units of family housing for low income families. The report recalled first site choice of NE 16th and Kirkland NE was rejected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development Renton City Council 8/3/81 Page 2 Old Business Continued - Community Services Committee - Continued Family Housing by because of its close proximity to other publicly assisted units. Housing Authority The report explained the site selection is a two-acre area east of at NE 3rd Street Vantage Point Condominiums between NE 3rd St. and NE 4th St, with access off NE 4th St. and is the second choice of the Housing Authority. Following discussion, Acting Planning Director Clemens noted HUD has not given final approval of the site, that assisted housing does exist within the census tract. Council noted concern for adequate bus transportation. Parking Tickets Councilman Shane asked that parking tickets be cancelled that were issued in the downtown area on Saturday during Western Days due to streets being cleared. Mayor Shinpoch and Police Representative Persson noted no complaints have been received. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report recommended concurrence in the Committee adoption of the proposed policy statement for reimbursement of Chairman: Clymer travel and per diem expenses for candidates competing for Recruitment of selected positions in the City. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, Department Heads - ADOPT THE REPORT AND REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION AS POLICY STATE- Reimbursement MENT. CARRIED. Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report recommended the City enter Committee into an agreement with the City of Normandy Park for the housing Chairman: Hughes of their prisoners and the Council authorize the Mayor and City Normandy Park Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, Prisoners CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Automatic Response The Public Safety Committee recommended the City and neighboring Mutual Aid cities and Fire Districts (such as Bellevue, Kent , Tukwila, King County #20, #25, #40) enter into mutual aid and automatic response agreements. The report stated rendering of assistance under this agreement would be of mutual benefit to all jurisdic- tions for emergency medical aid and fire supression situations and requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper form. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee report noted review of appeal Development by Dominic Colasurdo of Hearing Examiner' s decision for denial Committee of a Special Permit for filling and grading of a site located Chrm: Rockhill at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of NE 4th and Appeal Union Ave. SE. The Committee concluded that the Examiner was in Dominic Colasurdo error and the committee found that the drainage feature crossing Special Permit the subject property is not a "stream" requiring preservation SP-024-81 pursuant to Section 4-2313-4 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. The Committee recommended the Examiner' s decision regarding SP-024-81 be reversed and the permit be granted subject to compliance with the City' s Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. Councilman Stredicke inquired re defini- tion of stream and was advised by Councilman Rockhill that stream had permanent source of water; that committee felt this was drain- age situation subject to rain. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR WITH FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances Committee for second and final readings: (First readings 7/27/81 ) Chairman: Clymer An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from GS-1 to R-1 ; property located on west side of Olympia Ave. NE Ordinance #3564 between NE 10th St. and NE 10th Place; known as the Kampe Construc- Kampe Construction tion Co. Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN THE Rezone R-046-81 RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, SHANE, REED; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3565 An ordinance was read for appropriation of $82,000 and transfer Appropriation and of $117,522 unto Parker property/Cedar River Trail for acquisition Transfer of property; total purchase price $225,000. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND Parker Property ROCKHILL, CONCUR AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Attorney noted donation of 53 acres rather than 25. 0177 OF R4, 40 Z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09,0 co- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 47-60 SEP1— P August 21, 1981 One Valley Place Properties 2691 168th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98009 ATTN: Mr. Daryl Connell RE: Recorded Document(s) Resttictive Covenants R-047-81 Gentlemen, Enclosed herewith are copies of the document(s) that have been recorded with King Co. The original document(s) are on file in the City Clerk's Office. If you have any further questions, please, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON acgdevz, a. 77i.ZQ.ct- Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:db ENC: I I Renton City Council 8/17/81 Page 2 Consent Agenda continued Transfer of Director of Finance authorized to borrow sum of $500,000.00 from Funds from Street Forward Thrust Fund, 15% interest per annum, and allocate Forward Thrust 300,000.00 to Park Fund and $200,000.00 to Street Fund, with to Park and repayment no later than 12/21/81 . Refer to Ways and Means Street Fund Committee for resolution. Transfer of Finance and Park Departments requested resolution transferring Funds Re: 3,689.00 from Contingency Fund unto Current Fund/General Services Historical Division for painting the Historical Museum Building. Refer to Museum Ways and Means Committee for resolution. i Used Ca- Dealers State Legislature passed a law providing Cities can no longer tax License or regulate used car dealers, although provides for business tax which is levied on other businesses. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance regulating used car dealer's license and operation of used car businesses. IT WAS MOVED BY STEDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Maplewood Heights Letter from Maplewood Heights Maintenance Company concerning three Maintenance Co. storm water disposal methods currently approved by the City of Renton as follows: 1 ) storm drain located in Heather Downs Division No. 2; 2) culvert to be covered on the land of Dominic Colasurdo, SP-024-81 ; 3) road over the creek washed away, three threes uprooted along water course allegedly attributed to Fernwood East. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATION FOR RESPONSE AND COPY OF RESPONSE BE PROVIDED FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE POLICY OF NOTIFICATION OF VACATION OF STREETS BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER NOTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS IN AREA BY LETTER ALONG WITH THE CURRENT METHODS. CARRIED. Shane requested to be excused at this time. Granted. 9:22 p.m. Community Community Services Committee reviewed a study by the Housing and Sergi es Community Development staff on the need and feasibility of a Committee multi-service center for Renton area, in anticipation of a Multi-Service Joint Block Grant application. Recommendation will be forthcoming Center to Council later on the project. Public Safety Public Safety Committee report recommended no changes be made Committee to lessen the qualifications and requirements for approving For-HT T- for-hire driver's licenses. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND License HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. The Public Safety Committee recommended adoption of Adoptioi of Section 9A.08.020, Section 9A.08.030, and Chapter 106, Laws of State Law 1981 , Senate Bill No. 3306 of RCW to our city ordinances. They relate to being an accomplice in wrongdoing and probable cause arrests thus allowing prosecution in Renton Municipal Court instead of Renton District Court. IT WAS MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinance Committee for second and final reading: (First reading 8/10/81) Ordinan :e #3569 An ordinance was read (including summary) changing the zoning One Val ey classification from G General to P-1 ,Public Use District for Place Ri:zone property located south of Valley General Hospital and S.W. of R-047-8 the intersection of Talbot Rd. S and S.W. 43rd Street; known as the One Valley Place Rezone R-047-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL August 17, 1981 Regular Meeting Council Chambers Monday, 8:00 P.M. Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COUNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS TRIMM, CHARLES SHANE AND JOHN REED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; DANIEL KELLOGG, Asst. City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE DELORES MEAD, City Clerk, LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; ROGER BLAYLOCK, Associate Planner; and GLADYS HARDING, Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 10, 1981 , AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 N.E. 11th Place, Renton, expressed concern regarding proposed apartment complex nearby. After presenting his questions of setback requirements for side and back lots, landscaping, and zoning, and after concern of setback requirements versus church setback requirements, IT WAS MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, THE ADMINISTRATION DIRECT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO ANSWER MR. EVAN'S QUESTIONS. CARRIED. CF/CHG ASSOCIATES Randy Potter, CHG, 200 South 333rd, Federal Way, asked to advance to PPUD-049-81 the Planning and Development Committee report. IT WAS MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, TO SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee considered the appeal of Hearing Examiner decision of CF/CHG Associates, PPUD-049-81 , and recommended modification as follows: 1 ) strike Condition #1 requiring restrictive covenants limiting the square footage permitted; 2) modify Condition #6 to delete minimum caliper size requirement; 3) strike last sentence of Conclusion #4 to clarify that access roads may be permitted over archaeological site; and 4) add to Conclusion #10 that proposed uses within development may be amended as provided by City Code. IT WAS MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. After discussion, IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THAT THE MOTION BE TABLED MOMENTARILY TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL COMMENT FROM COUNCIL. CARRIED. Rudy Zaputil , 420 Lind Avenue S.W. , expressed concern of egress/ ingress throughout proposed development site. IT WAS MOVED AND SECONDED TO REMOVE THE SUBJECT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, ON PPUD-049-81 , FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. IT WAS MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CF/CHG ASSOCIATES The Planning and Development Committee considered the appeal of PPUD-050-81 Hearing Examiner decision of CF/CHG, PPUD-050-81 , and recommended modification as follows: 1) strike Condition #2 and add approval conditioned upon construction of Maple Avenue S. from Sunset Blvd. S.W. to S.W. 5th Street; and 2) modify Condition #4 to provide that landscape plans be reviewed and approved for final PUD Plat. IT WAS MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. After further discussion, Roger Blaylock demonstrated egress/ingress to Sunset Boulevard on exhibit maps as condition of PUD approval . CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Liberty Park Bids for renovations and additions to the Liberty Park Community Community Center Center opened on August 12, 1981 , with five bids received. Refer Bid Opening to the Park Board for recommendation. Anacortes Ave. Public Works Department recommended approval for use of Anacortes Block Party Avenue S.E. between S.E. 4th Street and S.E. 4th Place for "block party" requested by Mr. and Mrs. Frank T. Ruggiero, 407 Anacortes S.E. , August 22, 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Council concur. Renton City Council 8/10/81 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued First Reading An ordinance was read (including summary) changing the zoning One Valley Pl . classification from G General to P-1 Public Use District for Rezone property located south of Valley General Hospital and SW of the intersection of Talbot Rd. S and SW 43rd St; known as the One Valley Place Rezone R-047-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported Brian, son of Building Director Ron Nelson, REPORT will be in Japan for a baseball tournament and has volunteered to deliver a gift from Mayor Shinpoch to the Mayor of Nishiwaki , Renton 's Sister City. Brian is with Spokane Centennials, semi-pro t com. AUDIENCE COMMENT Councilman Rockhill introduced Riccardo Bergamo, visitor from Rotary Exchange Italy, interested in seeing American government at work. StuJent EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL MOVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS, LAND ACQUISITION AND PERSONNEL MATTER. CARRIED. Council met in Executive Session at 8:39 p.m. and returned to Regular Session with all Council Members present as previously shown. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ADJOURNMENT CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 9: 14 p.m. Delores A. Mead , CMt,C. City Clerk 1 EXPIll 35 CITY OF RENTON DATE 8/10)/81 wARRANT DISTRIBUTIO' TOTAL WARRANTS FUND MACHINE VOInS : #35093 — #35097 CURRENT 95, 433001 PARKS 26 258. 38 STREETS 514, 738 . 23 LIBRA°Y 514, 329 . 26 G COULON BCH PK CQNSTR S32, 751 . 69 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES 3, Q28. 75 WATERWORKS UTILITY 78, 592 • 40 AIRPORT 15, 248 . 94 1975 W b, S CONSTRUCTION S145, 986• 57 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 50909 , 67 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP , 4, 563 • 81 LID CONTROL 641010 TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS 437, 486, 81 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RELE1VtL DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NU. 35098 THROUGH NO. 35275 IN THE AMOUNT OF S437, 486 . 81 THIS10TM DAY OF AUGUST 19810 MEMBER w ! COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN s— L Y ` t( 7 MEMBER , R • • • - L.I.D. #322, REVENUE WARRANT No. #R-6 $641.10 File No. R-047-81 4 - 00 9t4i)i One Valley Place Prope 1 IG 1:1g 13 Y S0 0338 f:CISlAIG 18. Nlt£ 8 11 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ati 0308003N WHEREAS , RicharI M. Lomas, a single man , Dean M. Rockey and his wife Frances A. Rockey, Daryl R. Connell and his wife Michele M. Connell , and Harvey W. Williams and 1 his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams are the owners of the following real property in th- City of Renton., County of King, State of Washington , described as follows: The West half of the NE4 of the SW4 of the NE4, less roads; and the East half of the NW4 of the SW4 of the NE4 less roads; and that portion of the ON North 3 of the South 3- of the South 3- of the Northeast 4 of Section 31 ,Cl Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. ; lying West of County Road No. 80, O known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the South 133..00 feet of the East 327.50 feet ; AND EXCEPT the North 133.00 feet of the East 310 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion condemned for Primary State Highway No. 5, South O 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456;OD SUBJECT TO Condemnation by the State of Washington of right of access to State Highway and of light , view and air, by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE , the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose res; rictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land herEinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns , as follows: DEVELOPMENT Development on the subject site shall be limited to a Planned Unit Development through regulations established in the PUD Ordinance, City of Renton. DURATION Thes? covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reascnable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. 11:,,r,,y1 LC' A6r-/L‹..\ Rii cha -d W. Lomas Dean M. Rockey iv 177 Th)A-:4_ t (C9 reCEA-L7 Daryl 1 Connell Frances A. Rockey Michele M. Connell 1-"0 ,7.1 047.c1 F'EC[.i F 4. 00 AS HSL-4*:4:4 22 Page One of Two r - 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this 7-4 day of l 9 g/ , before me personal lc"---, appeared Richard M. Lomas, Dean Ms./Rock and his wife Frances A. Rockey, and Daryl''R. Connell and his wife Michele M. Connell , the persons who executed the within and forecoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. r qt 2.< _(,(. 4, Notary Public in and for the tate of Washington, residing in l e J jia /j C 6/ CS i, r1 Gu c=Q r,c/ Hary W. Williams Mar rte Dorothylliams STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this 28th day of July 19 81, before me personally. appared Harvey W. Williams and his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams , the" "e.r. bns .._ who executed the within and foregoing instrument to be the free and voluntary `act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offic;3l seal the day and year first above written. a/--& k:) r/1. 4z Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, residing in Renton FILED F OR RECORD AT REQUEST OF OF:If,c, OF THE CITY CLERK 3Eii101 M.'lWIPAL BLDG. L00 NU 1YE. SO. RE Nl OK WA 99095 Page Two of Two I OF RA, U y © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09 43 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 09gTED sEPSE' OP August 20, 1981 One Valley Place Properties 2691 168th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98009 ATTN: Mr. Daryl Connell RE: City of Renton - Rezone 047-81 Dear Mr. Connell: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 17, 1981, has adopted Ordinance No. 3569 to rezone your property from General Classification (G) to Public Use District (P-1) . A copy of the above-referenced Ordinance is enclosed. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON f /e LG ON Y-/,.4Lc4L.-a("L Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. DAM:db ENC: 1 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDA TO : Planning Dept. kid% 0* J DATE : I. 8/10/81 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk p,UG 1 1981 RE : Ordinances and Resolution \` One Valley Place Rezone 047-81 9,yNIN PDQ We attach Resolution (s ) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. Exhibit A 0 of OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 Z r rn 0 — LAWRENCE 7.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY AO99T, go-August 10 , 1981 SUSAN R. IRWIN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY SEPS- TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney RE: Rezone Ordinance - R-047-81 - One Valley Place Properties Dear Del : Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as above captioned. Lawrence J, Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee Mayor Council President Planning Dept. v CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION (G) TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT (P-1) / R-047781 - ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES) Section 1 : An Ordinance changing certain property located south of Valley General Hospital and Southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S .W. 43rd Street, Renton, King County , Washington, from General Classification District (G) to Public Use District (P-1) which property is legally described as follows : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Section 2: This Ordinance was adopted on August 1981 . A full text of this Ordinance will be mailed without charge upon request to the City Clerk. Date of Publication: CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANG- ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION G ) TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT (P-1 ) . (R-047-81 - ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the Cit , of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification (G ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of ;aid property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 29 , 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 9, 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FDLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Public Use District (P-1 ) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 30, 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . X Said property being located South of Valley General Hospital and Southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street . ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about July 24 , 1981 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . F/ O 73/ Deana which said Covenants are hereby incor- pornted and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its pas: age , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of August , 1981 . Delores A . Mead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of August , 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J. Warren , City Attorney Date of Publication : f y CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. _ 3569 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANG- ING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION G ) TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT (P-1 ) . .. (R-047-81 - ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification (G ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 29, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 9, 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Public Use District (P-1 ) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 30, 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. S'' 3 Said property being located South of Valley General Hospital and Southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street . ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on .or about July 24 , 1981 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . 8107310439 and which said Covenants are hereby incorq porated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of August , 1981 . 1// ! (/-- Delores A. Mead, City, Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of August , 1981 . 6A1.).C{St0 S Barbara Y. Stlinpoch , Mipyor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J. Warren , City Attorney Date of Publication : August 21, 1981 (Summary Form) ORDINANCE NO. 3569 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Re-zone R-047-81 One Valley Place Properties The West half of the NEI of the SWI of the NEi:, less roads; and the East half of the NWk of the SWI of the NEk less roads; and that portion of the North } of the South } of the South } of the Northeast k of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. ; lying West of County Road No. 80, known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the South 133.00 feet of the East 327.50 feet ; AND EXCEPT the North 133.00 feet of the East 310 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion condemned for Primary State Highway No. 5, South 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456; SUBJECT TO Condemnation by the State of Washington of right of access to State Highway and of light , view and air, by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456. itt•. I ij ti, I Ili i I- 6ill/ SR-1 1 P J21 L it II10 1, 17 11 A i kri —4, P-I ' / .. ';:''''re .,,„ " I:71 1 SS i---- r-per I 61 NI s 10 sk Z01 NIN r P-1 I CITY L.r MIT-i I 1 ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES REZONE REQUEST G" GENERAL USE CLASSIFICATION TO P-1, PUBLIC USE R-047-81 PRELIMINARY COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPUD-032-81 PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-044-81 APPL I CANT ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA 11.7 acres PR I NC 1 PAL ACCESS S.W. 43rd Street & Talbot Road South EXISTING ZONING G" General Use Classification EXISTING USE Vacant/Single Family Residence PROPOSED USE Office/Commercial Park CCMPREHENS I VE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public COMMENTS I 4 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date 8-19-81 TO: City Clerk FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: Re-zone R-047-81 One Valley Properties - Ord. No. 3569 Attached plese find the legal description for the ordinance of said subject re-zone R-047-81 . Very Truly Yours, Abdoul Gafour r e EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Re-zone R-047-81 One Valley Place Properties The West half of the NEk of the SWk of the NEk, less roads; and the East half of the NWk of the SWk of the NEJ less roads; and that portion of the North } of the South 4 of the South # of the Northeast * of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; lying West of County Road No. 80, known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the South 133.00 feet of the East 327.50 feet; AND EXCEPT the North 133.00 feet of the East 310 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion condemned for Primary State Highway No. 5, South 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456; SUBJECT TO Condemnation by the State of Washington of right of access to State Highway and of light, view and air, by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456. I I For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Di''./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 3, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-047-81 ; One Valley Place Consent X Properties Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution x Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A•_ Examiner' s Report , 6-30-81 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X restrictive covenants Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period for the Examiner's Recommendation regarding the attached rezone request has expired and restrictive covenants have been signed by all property owners. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council nembers for referral to Ways and Means Committee and subsequent adoption cf an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: ee page 6 of the attached report N ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY N00 For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING z=. az:sa z SUBMITTIN; Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 3, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-047-81 ; One Valley Place Consent X Public Hearing Properties Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Repnrt , 6-30-81 Other B. Approval : C. Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance restrictive covenants FISCAL MPACT: Appropriation- Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY ;Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Tlie appeal period for the Examiner's Recommendation regarding the attached rezone request has expired and restrictive covenants have been signed by a property owners. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council m:mbers for referral to Ways and Means Committee and subsequent adoption o` an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 6 of the attached report SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. File No. R-047-81 One Valley Place Propert DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 03 WHEREAS, Richard M. Lomas, a single man, Dean M. Rockey and his wife Frances A. Rockey, Daryl R. Connell and his wife Michele M. Connell , and Harvey W. Williams and his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: The West half of the NE* of the SW* of the NE*, less roads; and the East half of the NW* of the SW* of the NE* less roads; and that portion of the North 1 of the South of the South 1 of the Northeast 4 of Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; lying West of County Road No. 80, known as the Kent-Renton Road; EXCEPT the South 133.00 feet of the East 327.50 feet ; AND EXCEPT the North 133.00 feet of the East 310 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion condemned for Primary State Highway No. 5, South 228th Street in Kent-Renton by State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456; SUBJECT TO Condemnation by the State of Washington of right of access to State Highway and of light , view and air, by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 573456. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE , the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: DEVELOPMENT Development on the subject site shall be limited to a Planned Unit Development through regulations established in the PUD Ordinance, City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Jt--r41)--1il 0-- Richard W. Lomas Dean M. Rockey iv J47-41L(t Cl C1'',(7DarylAConnelllFrancesA. Rockey 619 Michele M. Connell Page One of Two STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this Z q day of 19'/ , before me personally appeared Richard M. Lomas, Dean M.-'Rocke{ and his wife Frances A. Rockey, and Daryl R. Connell and his wife Michele M. Connell , the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the tate of Washington, residing in v L e / 7 /.1 e -<l( ) Hary W. Williams Marerite Dorothy Williams STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this 28th day of July 19 81, before me personally appared Harvey W. Williams and his wife Marguerite Dorothy Williams, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offic?31 seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, residing in Renton Page Two of Two I INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date July 20th, 1981 TO: Planning Department FROM:Engineering Department SUBJECT: Legal description of Preliminary plat of One Valley Place P.U.D. Based on our available maps and records, the legal description as shown on the preliminary plat of One Valley Place P.U.D. is satisfactory. Don Monaghan Office Engineer RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUL 2 1981 AM PM 718,9,10,11112,1,2,3,4,5,6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING Statc of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 30th day of June 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this '30 day of J 3 e) 19 gl 1}(<.6.U-La Notary Public in and for ths State of Washington, residing at Application, Petition or Case: One Valley Place Properties; R-047-81 The minute's contain a tint 06 ,the pan.tLea o5 necond. ) June 30, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: One Valley Place Properties FILE NO. R-047-81 LOCATION: South of Valley General Hospital and southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to P-1 to allow development of office and commercial space. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on June 4, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 9, 1981 at 1 :20 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Mr. Blaylock advised that a portion of the property owned by Mr. & Mrs. Williams is under purchase option, and a supplementary affidavit of ownership of that parcel will be provided to the Examiner. He also noted that the water system facility is half constructed at this point and will be operational within three to four months. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Daryl Connell 2691 168th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98008 Mr. Connell indicated that the site is ideally suited for the type of proposal designated on the city' s Comprehensive Plan, and meets the needs of the area for medical and dental office useage. He noted that the current market is such that more specialists would be coming in the area if sufficient space existed. Additionally, he stated that an expansion project planned by Valley General Hospital will result in provision of the largest such facility in the south King County area. Mr. Connell reviewed plans for provision of a convalescent retirement center, restaurant and bank to serve the area. Mr. Connell discussed installation and extension of utility facilities to serve the proposal , and reviewed phasing of the project over a six year period with 20,000 to 30,000 square feet of office space constructed each year. He noted that orderly growth will be dependent upon the needs of the community and financing, and development will be constrainer by conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC & R' s) to ensure compliance with project plans. The document was entered into the record by the Examiner as follows: Exhibit #3: Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the first properties to be developed and the timing of construction, Mr. Connell advised that Lots 1 and 2 would be constructed with 20,000 square feet of office space, hopefully, by spring of 1982, depending upon availability of financing. The Examiner observed that the policy element of the R-047-81 Page Two 4 Comprehensive Plan recommends avoidance of speculative rezoning of property and changing the character of an area prior to actual development. Mr. Connell responded that the Examiner's point is well taken, but a need currently exists for a convalescent retirement center which would be dependent upon state funding for reimbursement. The Examiner inquired regarding the ownership and use of the property south of the pipestem road extending to Talbot Road which is not included in the proposal . Mr. Connell advised that a single family residence is located on the parcel which is owned by Mr. Longwell . He stated that a 100-foot setback will be required on Lot 9 of the proposal to buffer the privately owned lot. Mr. Connell concluded his testimony by stating that there is nothing speculative regarding the proposed rezone, the project will provide a well-planned roadway and utility system, and control the end product for the City of Renton; however, many factors will affect the timing of development and completion. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There was no response. He then invited testimony in opposition or general comments. Responding was: Mike Cvitkovic Valley General Hospital 400 S. 43rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Cvitkovic, Projects Coordinator representing the hospital , indicated that although hospital representatives neither support nor oppose the application, they would like to go on record as voicing a continuing concern regarding traffic conditions on S.W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road. He noted that the emergency entrance to the facility is located on S.W. 43rd Street which is an area of high congestion in a location where U-turns occur. He stated that the proposal would be acceptable if traffic conditions are improved on both of those roadways. The Examiner requested further comments in opposition. Responding was: Grover Shegrud 4518 Talbot Road S. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Shegrud indicated concern regarding traffic generated by the proposal from a complex containing 140,000 square feet of office space which he concluded would generate approximately 5,000 vehicle trips per day past his driveway, advising that his residence is located directly opposite the Talbot Road pipestem. He emphasized the importance of providing a more acceptable means of routing traffic in and out of the residential and commercial portion of the project since the area remains residential in character. Responding to Mr. Shegrud 's comments was: Christopher Brown Traffic Engineer 9688 Rainier Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98118 Mr. Brown referenced a traffic study submitted for the proposal on May 15, 1981 in which is contained projections for traffic generation, and stated his belief that Talbot Place should be signalized in order to inhibit traffic problems. He noted that the signal is feasible, workable and warranted, and has a number of positive attributes in the functioning of Talbot Road because it will divert the traffic from that street. Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding the effect of a signal at the access onto Talbot Road itself, Mr. Brown stated that traffic signals can only be installed if five sets of warrants exist which could be researched by the developer. However, he indicated that although a signal may be warranted during peak hour traffic, it would not be necessary during the major portion of the day. The Examiner discussed the possibility that if the intersection of S.W. 43rd and Talbot Place is signalized, it may cause motorists to avoid that signal and exit onto Talbot Road. Mr. Brown disagreed, stating that since afternoon traffic would be traveling eastbound, motorists would avoid the signal at Talbot Road and 43rd by driving through the development through Talbot Place and on to 43rd. Responding to Mr. Shegrud' s request for clarification of signal warrants, Mr. Brown explained that five accidents, correctable by signalization, would warrant installation of a signal at an intersection. He also noted that trip generation rates have been documented in several publications including one from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The Examiner requested final comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock referenced earlier comments pertaining to uses allowed in the P-1 zone, and stated that not all of the proposed uses would be allowed outright, but would be allowed through the conditional use process; however, the reason that alternative was not included in R-047-81 Page Three the Planning Department report is due to the fact that the final PUD would have such stringent review that it would function as both site plan and conditional use permit in one. The Examiner requested additional time of 21 days in which to publish a report in the matter due to the length of the hearings. Since there was no objection, the hearing regarding File No. R-047-81 was closed by the Examiner at 2: 10 p.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 11 .7 acres from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to P-1 Public/Quasi-Public) for the purposes of developing a planned unit development (PUD) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located south of S.W. 43rd and west of Talbot Road South. The property has frontage along S.W. 43rd Street and is separated from Talbot Road S. by the Deak Clinic. 7. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 3031 in May of 1976, and the current G zoning was applied at that time. 8. The Valley General Hospital is located north of the subject site and various clinics and related medical and dental facilities are located along both Talbot Road S. and S.W. 43rd Street in this vicinity. 9. The Andrew Deak Rezone was approved by the City Council within the last two years File No. R-286-79) . The hospital is undergoing a major expansion at the current time. The clinics in the area have been established within the last five to ten years. 10. The recent amendment to the Renton Comprehensive Plan for the southeast area designated the subject property as suitable for the development of public and quasi- public uses. 11 . The zoning in the area consists of a mixture of P-1 zoning, the category requested by the applicant , and G zoning, the current classification of the site and located south and east of the site. R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) zoned property located east of the site is generally developed with medically related facilities. The King County zoning in the area consists of a public type zone, single family zoning and agricultural zoning. 12. The applicant proposed developing a planned unit development on the subject site and the environmental review was predicated upon such development. The applicant has simultaneously proposed developing a residential PUD immediately south of the subject site. The PUDs, with the exception of access, are independent of each other, and the analysis of the P-1 reclassification request is independent of the residential requests insofar as whether the P-1 classification is appropriate for the subject site (See below for traffic analysis) . 13. As a result of the environmental review, a traffic analysis was prepared for the various proposals. The analysis proceeded to analyze the traffic impacts of potential P-1 uses on the roads in the area. In addition, the analysis was compiled in conjunction with concurrent medium and low density development of the southerly adjoining property. The traffic analysis of the potential development of the subject site is based on a forecast amount of 12.3 vehicles generated by each 1 ,000 gross square feet of R-047-81 Page Four developed property. Maximum potential development on the subject site would produce approximately 140,000 square feet, and therefore generate approximately 1 ,722 average weekday traffic trips. The potential peak hour traffic would potentially be about 259 vehicles in the a.m. and 189 in the p.m. The applicant proposes to phase development. Development of about 20,000 gross square feet would occur in the first year (1982) and about 40,000 gross square feet would be developed per year in each of the next three years. 14. The traffic projections were considered adequate for purposes of analysis by the city Traffic Engineer, with the exception of the historical growth, that is, the growth which is not attributed to a specific project. The difference amounts to about 3% per year or about 150 vehicle trips per day. 15. The environmental determination was based on the imposition of a mitigation fee for traffic improvements in the vicinity of the subject site. Based on the analysis of traffic related impact of the development of the subject site and the proposed multi- family development south of the site, the city Traffic Engineer indicated that mitigation would not alleviate adverse and deteriorating traffic conditions. The beneficial effects of the implementation of mitigating measures will not necessarily maintain the current level of service upon development of the subject site under the proposed zoning classification together with the proposed development of the southerly properties as a mix of medium density multifamily housing and along with the expected other growth south of the subject site in King County. 16. In addition, not all of the proposed mitigating measures are within the control of the City of Renton, as certain improvements to ramps and traffic control devices at the S.W. 43rd Street/SR-167 intersection are within the control of the state. Other measures proposed by the applicant were questioned by the city Traffic Engineer and Police Departments. These measures included restrictions on turning movements at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and Talbot Place; three lane turning areas at S.M. 43rd Street and Talbot Road; and relocation of the Valley General Hospital ' s 43rd Street entrance. Additional state improvements include loop ramping to avoid the left turns onto and off of the Valley Freeway (SR-167) at S.W. 43rd Street as well as additional traffic control devices. 17. The probable effects of state inaction would result in ever worsening traffic conditions in this area. The current level of service is adverse today at LOS of D or E. By 1985, the LOS will reach F if the state improvements are not implemented. Even with such improvements the capacity of roads in the area is severely limited by other constraints such as width and prior improvements. 18. Immediately east of the subject site and abutting the proposed access road for the subject site is a parcel zoned G and containing a single family house. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan ; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the facts overcome the burden and the proposed reclassification should be approved. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses. This area is found to be especially suited to the development of support type services for the Valley General Hospital located just north of the subject site across S.W. 43rd Street. Adjoining zoning located immediately east of the subject site is P-1 . Valley General is also located on land classified P-1 . 3. Many acres of land in this area are developed with clinics to afford nearby clinic/ office space for the various doctors associated with the hospital , and the subject R-047-v1 Page Five site is similarly suited. 4. The traffic generated, especially by development of the subject site with about 140,000 square feet of office facilities and other uses compatible with the P-1 zoning, can generally be handled without adversely impacting the current LOS of D/E now occurring during peak hours. The further phasing of development would presumably time development with the proposed potential improvements to traffic control methods in the area. The conclusions drawn by the applicant and city Traffic Engineer vary about the impacts on traffic with concurrent development of the multiple residential development of up to the 325 units proposed for the two properties immediately north, which two properties are the subject of separate reclassification requests. The subject proposal standing alone and phased should not adversely affect the existing LOS. 5. In -order to assure that traffic, the most pressing concern affecting proposed development in this area, is not adversely affected, the timing of development and the nature of development should be carefully controlled. The applicant should be required to file covenants restricting development to the PUD format originally proposed by the applicant. Such processing will assure coordinated access and could control the potential mix of uses and thereby control the maximum level of traffic generated by the proposal . 6. In addition, the phasing of development as anticipated by the traffic analysis prepared for the subject site should be required. That is, no more than about 20,000 square feet should be constructed in the first year following reclassification, and no more than about 40,000 square feet should be constructed during each subsequent year. Development should also be limited to no more than the 140,000 square feet originally proposed. These figures should be generally taken as an upper limit on development in any one year, but to provide reasonable flexibility, an upward variation of not more than 10% should be permitted in any one year. 7. The location of an existing single family home immediately east of the site and abutting a major access road from the subject site requires low intensity uses and buffering to meet the goal or either locating compatible uses adjacent to each other or effectively screening incompatible uses. Therefore, the applicant should provide at least 25 feet of dense landscaping immediately adjacent to that single family home and the access road should be also heavily landscaped with not less than 25 feet of landscaping located adjacent to the single family home. Such limitation and landscapinc should be required as long as that property is used for single family purposes. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification to P-1 of the subject site subject to the following conditions: 1 . The site be developed as a PUD subject to covenants not unlike those submitted as Exhibit #3. 2. Development be phased so that not more than 22,000 gross square feet is developed during the first year of construction, and not more than 44,000 gross square feet is developed in any subsequent year; and further limited to not more than a total of 140,000 gross square feet to be constructed on the subject site. 3. The installation of a 25-foot dense landscape buffer along all property lines adjacent to the single family home located on Talbot Road S. prior to the start of construction on the subject site. This requirement may be modified if the single family use is abandoned and the zoning is changed to other than the current or other single family classifications. Other provisions of the codes and regulations of the City of Renton remain in effect as far as landscaping and setback. 4. Development of the subject site shall be subject to review of the city and no use may be established prior to a review and approval of that specific use after an analysis of its effects on traffic have been thoroughly determined. ORDERED THIS 30th day of June, 1981 . 6"4"4"--• Fred J. Kau an Land Use Hearing Examiner R-047-81 Page Six TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of June, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Don Lochner, 3540 128th Ave. S.E. , Bellevue, WA 98006 Daryl Connell , 2691 168th Avenue S.E. , Bellevue, WA 98008 Thomas Emrich, Mithun Associates, Architects, 2000 112th N.E. , Bellevue, WA 98004 Doravin Wilson, 720 S. 55th Street , Renton, WA 98055 Nancy Purcell , M.D. , 10006 S.E. 192nd, Renton, WA 98055 Grover Shegrud, 4518 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Christopher Brown, Traffic Engineer, 9688 Rainier Ave. S. , Seattle, WA 98118 Douglas L. Morell , D.M.D. , 1015 Houser Way S. , Renton, WA 98055 Vincent Ferrese, Mithun Associates, Architects, 2000 112th N.E. , Bellevue, WA 98004 Robert Page, 4907 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Roy Fournier, 4700 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer, City of Renton Lt. Don Persson, Renton Police Department Ronda Johnson, 17818 98th S. , Renton, WA 98055 Mike Cvitkovic, Valley General Hospital , 400 S. 43rd St. , Renton WA TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of June, 1981 to the following: 98055 Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 14, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment , or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. i . s I 1. t i V. SR-I M an P' rt-- A; I r 29)_)' )t_-)7 -\ pp L /. ....,:,:;„ 1..:\, • 72 4. es : 2, : 7,. I II,. 2 -•23 ,- - N ,Y 2^ 22 •• ._4 i•-VJ Li)1 VC I L. k...3 S tI , ZON1 NG I C CITY LO-MM"IT-S ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES REZONE REQUEST G" GENERAL USE CLASSIFICATION TO P-1, PUBLIC USE R-047-81 PRELIMINARY COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPUD-032-81 PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-044-81 APPL I CANT ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA 11.7 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 43rd Street & Talbot Road South EXISTING ZONING G" General Use Classification EXISTING USE Vacant/Single Family Residence PROPOSED USE Office/Commercial Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public COMMENTS Is"----..- r.--___..- _ --- - -- 7- - - 1-• N' s '%' N• s--'' '''•• i NN, N, N.'"1 1--r-i-.:-... 1 P.'••••.- kj• 4 . N. N''' i ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES I N N PRELIMINARY COMMERCIAL PLANNED r. L,, , _1 1 i , ..,1_,...._-.....t N UNIT DEVELOPMENT, •- , L, 1,...., ,......1-1 ', - - ,:; •PPUD-032-81i' El F.:,-::•H-:-.71L, --' ;',...;•••'-ii,L./ 1-- ` L.:-:7.1 D. P • ,•/. 0-':• Ne'N N s . •i cs 4 i' 4) \/1 i' '•."-N 4,Ft. z_.......___(,-.2y-:-.) :_7--.Ni .Z —...- - 5- 7 N N,? 1'.'7. 45,.....,::. r\s.1 r.:Z•••// i:• 1/ .,-4...- 1 4 ......., ....„) i a) e'..se.. — F.:-,-..-4-A4,> .;.'1.4,---,. ._-__,,,,,.....:-:::....-'-'•',.7'.. 4,,, • • ...:...t./ --- . 4-." ' ii N';' ''. S----- -- ---D•"- •:-s _l.-. 1- -QQ-=...,.-'.",=,•'--;`--,.• ..'-')-- L'... • • .-/' 1. 1 I,'.. N. -- N , 1 1.11;ifamly 4...', B • 4, P. N 1 /,.//%., .. N 'c..leni.al i N / • • l•--7----... i,„:"...'5.,.. _•;.,-,..,,i^:•• \;:,..1,,c,', ..N 1,_:), 1.-"tn. .ir._. ..-_ . r•.... 1, ,- 4-7= 1•.' " r. r i I..i .. . '• 1- ' '-1 12 4-'--I 1.':.,.7-.-.:( . 1 i, . 4224'5'...} - ?;,.„,_,.yr,,„ ! ,_--,.. ---,,,_ \ N-'-- ' ,--t--,,,.-1,-. (--.! .,,..,J ----- _. ‘:•'''.%-i:k:-')_j--';'` f': „ . s• J.! fr: ) .... , y. " 1‘ /-----;—,: — - .__ 4.:„/ r ' I '1.1:1 r ,. . .14 I I i i ("":-.$41.e...% 1, . 4,-- N.,. /./ l, 1"-Z,/. 1-. I k• x.,...-.: x..4 /1-'1* 5:::,---,:,v.,, ,/: i:'•-.. ' 11..,,, ....I ,N A%-li•i• s- 1••,' • •k ,. , ,A i ,_ „.....:4•1;4 , t., , 9 11, I I !. I ' •if;I ; T-%•;• i (\,iir-,. 1 f:,-_- 7, /:-V.;_ ).,.;',C.7)?•:„..„,!..4‘p-:-.. /,•:".;•• i\ s""i •.a/. l',• I r!..!,_ ,..->_;..../ -...A.._,‘-,-•.L.,\.._1 //' %. ./. 31 O --4- 4 , 4. 4./ • ..,...,,, 1•. .s.,-44..1,.k......- ... ..,,........p,I ___w_ . •.•4 , A"' Cr..1...Z."Ni/.''..._4C W--7.:,..'.. ',,,.,'"•*je,, •"---6F'!.,I 1‘ i/17-- 4. 6..2-:? i. t,. ,...F.. 1 .1T7)'.1' 1111:i71: t": 1:-- 72-7\---t.;:'''-'-').\---'11:..:*- -1- .H.‘!.. .'ik...'':;.).- -- Zi"./ .....-'<• L';‘'...4.':. 4 1 7.,1"•;.`,......• A1 '.' _.''',..: ' ',I:..12.il;•1,: f; ' 1! 4- - _ :•• .....„-.7.i. ,:::,•1 i;,,,,•••••- ...: •'.''‘ -/1,...,,( 4--. •',„ -)I4,, •• •., ••••-•• . .,:. 0....,.:i..•--, i •••----, ) i I 4 t .I.. I.....C.-'...•".2/, 7, 11 ' [ I 1 ,•••"e. P.'''.4.• • •II I (.1..; 1 i 1 1 L:r G ti;14':(4i : ::t')• Z4 '. ..)./".'" tI 4% • /` '.....‘,, ''.; .`,...X, • A,. , Cf::'7:3 ... : . (7) i I i • 1 c- •• • 1I,t 1 i 1 1'1'f4; •....--t' 1; ,••,..., ... .' . 51 ‘' "i", „.•KI . 1 k!iii. *.).. ,,,,, i t. !-, ii. .; ;, ,,....rz ,,,•ss .,,... ----; . •,., i , Ns, .. . l• 1 P i I-••-,r...L......_, ,...‘ `.„?..- 1 ' i --, •••• . J'. , e s, ...-4.e. -44+. . ..1, , • - .1! r - I! f" t 1'.• .• .....:. i'-'''..'s '- 7/.:...) ''..,.>`-••• •!,;. ..4-rs) -, • . . i .I .;) . ;‘1.11,4...--„,,....—,,..,,,...„, . ! h i • . ri i 1:.------.' )1"-177-u, . IfCrill:. i:. ..1 ..t t I,I I -* r.'''. ) t. f • N. I•I 1 , r„e:-:..••?.; 1....'4-'•:, e .... s` ''''-‘• •""•••''' •....." .../ ; 1'I. .:, I s 1.•. -t•..-...1C '----er - Fr'-.. i, y,• il! I • I], ..„ ._.. - .. ..,1 . t- i 1.:4---.. ---.,.,•.,--s. - y; . k-_..) - I"".- 1 is r. , s.,. . ., — - 1 I • 11 1I - 1 I i . I 1:, l'• ,li, • Vt.! r 1'!..:k t'l ;r r•. 1k. 1' 1 !•1'. 11Al60CFIOADI 'I 'i• I III I OF R iv A.0 THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 235— 2550 0' 1tE.D SEP E, 04P MEMORANDUM DATE:JUNE 17, 1981 PO: FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FROM:ROGER J. BLAYLOCK ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: ONE VALLEY PLACE REZONE/AFFIDAVIT OF UNDERLYING OWNERSHIP Mrs. Marguerite D. Williams is owner of slightly more than one acre of the proposed One-Valley Place Rezone Application, File Number R-047-81, has signed the attached affidavit recognizing the rezone request. Doctors Rockey and Lomas are purchasing the property through option and thought they had authority to request the rezone. Mr. Daryl Connell has been representing all of the parties involved in the application process. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 1 71981 AM PM 71819110111112111213s4,516 AFFIDAVIT I, being duly sworn, declare that I am the o• ner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this_ day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Public) Sigature of Owner) Address) Address) ity) J 1State) Telep one) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This ::s to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rulas and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Pla;ping Dept . 2-73 DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ONE VALLEY PLACE This Declaration is made this day of 19 by ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES, a Washington Partnership ("OVP" ) . ARTICLE I. RECITALS 1. 01 OWNERSHIP. ONE VALLEY PLACE is the owner of the real property in King County, Washington, described in Exhibit "A" hereto ("Property" ) . 1. 02 PURPOSE. In order to establish and carry out a Master Plan for improvement and development of the Property as a business park, ONE VALLEY PLACE desires to impose mutual and beneficial Protective Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions CC&R' s" ) for the benefit of ONE VALLEY PLACE and the future owners of the Property. The key principle of ONE VALLEY PLACE' S business park development as embodied in the Master Plan (Exhibit "B" ) and these CC&R' s is the preservation of long-term property values by the creation and maintenance of an efficient high quality business environment having high development and maintenance standards in a campus or park-like setting. These CC&R' s are intended to maintain the integrity of the business park' s Master Plan and to preserve those associated tangible qualities of property value. It is the intent of these CC&R' s that the Property be developed in accordance with the Master Plan as an office community to accommodate professional and general office uses , hospital and convalescent care uses, and support activities such as branch banks , restaurants, and minor related retail uses. ARTICLE II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 . 01 ESTABLISHMENT OF CC&R' s. ONE VALLEY PLACE hereby declares that the Property is now held and shall be transferred, sold, encumbered, rented, leased, conveyed, used and occupied subject to these CC&R' s which shall run with the land and shall be maintained and pass with each and every parcel of the property to the direct, mutual , and reciprocal benefit and in favor of each and every other part and parcel of the Property, binding any party having any interest in the Property. 6/1/81 1- RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EX A.Mi`ER 3 AM ITEM ac/? —ff/C d p..:. - 2. 02 RESERVATION. For so long as it owns any interest in any parcel of the Property, ONE VALLEY PLACE reserves the right to ONE VALLEY PLACE and to ONE VALLEY PLACE' s Successor to: a) Delineate, plat, subdivide, grant, establish, create, relocate, convey or reserve within the Property, then owned by it such public or private streets, sidewalks, ways and easements for drainage, utilities and access , as it from time to time may deem necessary or appropriate for the development and maintenance of the business park, any of which may be dedicated to public use or conveyed to any appropriate governmental agency or authority free and clear of these CC&R' s; and b) With respect to any Parcel which it no longer owns, each and every owner thereof hereby irrevocably appoints ONE VALLEY PLACE as its agent and attorney-in-fact to do and effect any and all of the acts described under Section 2 . 02 a) above, so long as such act does not reduce the buildable area of any such Parcel or have any other material adverse effect on the value of the Property. 2 . 03 DEFINITIONS . As used herein, the. following mean: a) Approval Authority. i) ONE VALLEY PLACE, for so long as it owns any record interest in any part of the Property; or thereafter ii) Any corporation, association, partnership or trust controlled by ONE VALLEY PLACE or with which ONE VALLEY PLACE has been merged or consolidated or by which ONE VALLEY PLACE has been acquired (ONE VALLEY PLACE' s Successor) all as certified of record by ONE VALLEY PLACE, for so long as it owns of record any interest in any Parcel of the Property, or thereafter iii) Any association, whether or not incorp- orated, organized by the record owners of a majority of the Property for the purpose, among others, of implementing or enforcing these CC&R' s, provided ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE ' s Successor has granted to it of record such authority. b) City of Renton Land Use Code ("Code" ) . Ordinances of the City of Renton, applicable to land use in the Office Park; c) Developed Areas. Sites improved with building structures, parking lots, and landscaping; d) Parcel. Any fee title land ownership part of or interest inany site within the Property, excluding land or improvements dedicated to ownership by a public body, utility district, or other public or semi-public entity; e) Setback. Distance from the front, back or side property line as required for building structures; • 6/1/81 2- f) Site. Legal lot, or a collection of adjoining legal lots under a single ownership; g) Street. A dedicated public right of way or private thoroughfare serving any Parcel of the Property in common with other Parcels, or adjoining the business park, but excluding on-site driveways . ARTICLE III. PERAMITTED USES 3. 01 GENERAL. Property within the office park shall be used only for the purposes described under Section 1. 02 above, subject to the provisions of the Code and qual- ifications and restrictions stated in this Article III. 3. 02 VISIBILITY. All business uses conducted in the business park are to be contained entirely within completely enclosed buildings. 3. 03 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES. Other than temporary construction trailers and shacks described in Section 6. 03 below, on-site temporary office trailers or structures are not permitted. ARTICLE IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. 4 . 01 BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following criteria shall apply to the Property: a) Structures on Lots 1 through 9 may not exceed forty (40) feet in height, but excluding penthouse for storage, equipment and access; b) Structures on Lots 10, 11, 12 may not exceed one hundred ten (110) feet in height but excluding penthouse for storage, equipment and access. 4 . 02 BUILDING SETBACKS. All lots in the Property will be subject to the following setback restrictions : a) Lots 1 through 8 1) Front Yard: 60 ' 2) Side Yard: 5 ' 3) Rear Yard: 10 ' b) Lot 9 1) Front Yard: 20 ' 2) Side Yard: 5 ' 3) Rear Yard: 10 ' c) Lots 10 through 12 - Same as Lots 1 through 8 if the lots are built on as separate lots. If combined, for a high-rise structure, then: 6/1/81 3- 1 1) Front Yard: 60 ' 2) Side Yard: 20 ' 3) Rear Yard: 40 ' Masonry or concrete planters not exceeding four (4) feet tall may be constructed within setback distances. a) No trees exceeding a six (6) inch diameter measured four (4 ) feet above the ground may be cut down or cleared unless necessary for parking or building areas outside of landscaped sections) , for disease control, for thinning to enhance growth2of adjacent trees and under- story, or to accommodate site grading. Any tree clearing, grading, or thinning shall first be approved by the Approval Authority in site landscaping and grading plans. b) Landscaping of building Sites shall be completed within ninety (90) days of substantial building completion, with such time extended by the Approval Authority for adverse weather or seasonal conditions. Areas cleared or graded which are to remain open or undeveloped for a period of six (6) months or more following completion of clearing or grading shall be planted in the appropriate season by seeding with grasses and wildflowers1.. and be maintained in an attractive, well groomed and trimmed physical condition with healthy vegetation until actual on-site building and site development occurs. c) Utility corridors cleared of vegetation during construction are to have natural vegetation replaced, or alternatively, landscape upgrading or seeding with grasses and wildflowers following construction of utilities. Further, any steep slopes either existing or created during construction are to have natural vegetation either retained or replaced and upgraded according to approved individual site landscaping plans. d) Interior Property Lines Along Storage Areas. Any outside storage should be set back to a point behind the building front wall Setback, and a minimum of sixty (60) feet from Streets wich screening full height by a permanent material solid wall or non-corrosive chain link fence having solid redwood or cedar slats as well as landscape screening. 4 . 03 PARKING. The following parking requirements shall apply for all lots in the Property: a) Except for Lot 9 the first fifty-six (56) feet back from each front property line shall be used ex- clusively for 90 degree parking with two-way circulation. All parking in this area shall be open to each adjoining lot. b) All parking stalls shall be eight (8) feet wide by eighteen (18) feet in length except that 25% of all required parking may be compact parking spaces with a length of sixteen (16) feet. Wheel stops are required for all parking stalls and shall be placed two (2) feet in front of each stall. Landscaping behind a six (6) inch high curb may be used to replace the required wheelstop. 6/1/81 4- c) All parking layouts shall be 90 degree parking with twenty (20) foot aisle widths for either one-way or two-way circulation. d) Required parking for all office space, all lots shall be one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. Required parking for Lots 10, 11, and 12 if a high-rise structure is constructed thereon shall be one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of net rentable area. Required parking for all other uses in the Property shall be as specifically stated in the Renton Code. e) No on-street parking shall be permitted by office park employees or guests on internal public streets. f) The use of mass transportation (bus, car pooling or other means) is encouraged, as well as flexible working hours or staggered shifts to minimize peak period traffic loads and to conserve fuel. In determining actual minimum on-site parking requirements, the Approval Authority shall take into account each applicants special transportation plan and commitment to meet transit needs and parking requiee- ments for its employees. 4 . 04 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING. The following parking lot landscaping shall apply for all lots in the Property: a) A minimum of five percent (5%) of automobile parking lot areas (including driveways in these areas) is to be landscaped; b) One tree shall be required along each 60 feet of required landscaped area. Each required tree shall be identical in size and type as the tree planted in the public street abutting each lot. Ground cover in landscaped areas shall match the ground cover in the public right-of-way; c) No walls or fences may be constructed along property lines and a minimum of three (3) feet of landscaping shall be required from the property line to the back of the wheel stops. d) All sprinkler systems for parking lot land- scaping shall be installed according to City Code. 4 . 05 EQUIPMENT SCREENING. Rooftop mounted, mechanical equipment shall be screened. This screening may be accomplished either by use of a perimeter parapet wall added to the building structure and not exceeding four (4) feet in height, by in- dividually screening bulk equipment as approved by the Approval Authority or a combination. Equipment mounted on the ground surface shall be screened in the same fashion as outside storage. Any significantly noise-generating equipment either roof mounted or ground mounted) shall be noise screened from surrounding residential areas, using a full height sound absorbant solid screen barrier wall on the side (s) facing toward residential areas. 6/1/81 5- 4 . 06 WASTE RECEPTACLE SCREENING. Waste re- ceptacles visible from public streets shall be screened from view in the same fashion as outside storage. 4 . 07 INTERNAL STREETS. All internal Streets for public dedication shall be constructed to City standards and requirements. Private Streets shall be constructed to City structure and material standards , but not necessarily to dimension standards. 4 . 08 SIGNS. a) Permanent signs and directories shall be mounted either on building walls or freestanding in land- scaped areas. Signs shall contain no advertising material other than an identifying logo or trademark. All signs within the office park shall be constructed of a permanent material, with size and shape harmonious with the surrounding landscaping and building environment, and may be illuminated indirectly. No signs are permitted to be a source of light or have flashing, blinking, or moving lights or sign motion. Signs may not extend to a point taller than the adjoining building wall height. All permanent signs within the office park shall conform to further requirements of the Renton Sign Code. b) Temporary signs are permitted for leasing, sales, and marketing purposes if consistent with the standard design for the business park. Text content of these signs may vary as approved, according to the individuals marketing and product being marketed. One on-site construction sign of a maximum twenty-square-foot size, single face, is permitted on each site during construction. Marketing and construction signs may not be specially illuminated, and all temporary signs within the business park shall conform to further re- quirements and limitations of the Code. c) No sign may be painted directly on building walls. Wall mounted signs shall consist of raised lettering in colors harmonious to the building structure, and of no more than one inch in height for each foot of wall height, with a maximum height of four feet tall and a maximum length of ten percent (10%) of the building wall length. Multiple tenant buildings having over four (4) occupants shall have a standard approved building sign graphic lettering style and color system, although for these buildings, aggregate sign length may be twenty-five percent (25%) of the building wall length on which the signs are mounted. Unless special permission is granted, only one sign shall be permitted for each building occupant. The Approval Authority reserves the sole right to approve, disapprove, or reduce permitted sign size and design, according to the building scale, appearance, and number of building occupants . One occupant identification sign is permitted for each occupant, whether wall mounted, or freestanding. Freestanding permanent signs mounted in landscaped areas may not exceed the size permitted for wall mounted signs, are to be set back at least ten (10) feet from 6/1/81 6- the front curb line with a maximum height of four (4) feet above the ground surface, and are limited to one sign per building. d) Exterior building occupant directories shall be limited to one directory for each building having at least four (4 ) occupant companies. Directories shall conform to the maximum size, location, and approval standards for other permanent signs, with the available space for each occupant reduced accordingly. 4 . 09 MATERIALS AND COLORS. Building wall materials shall be of a permanent low maintenance type as approved by the Approval Authority, including concrete, masonry, glass , tongue and grove lap siding, and other materials approved in each specific instance. All wood, lap siding must be stained to a natural appearance and paint will be allowed only for trim. Plain concrete block walls , asbestos board, panelized wood siding, sheet metal, :plastics or similar. materials are prohibited. Concrete, brick or fibre reinforced panels are encouraged for Lots l and 2 _ and will be required for a high-rise structure on Lots 10 , 11 and 12. Except for specially textured concrete or masonry walls and glass, exterior surfaces are to be painted, stained, or factory finished with long-lasting, low-maintenance materials and in natural earth colors and design harmonious with the natural surroundings and environment. The use of reflective glass will be evaluated and approved or dis-approved by the Approval Authority in its sole judgment on a case-by- case basis, considering factors of location and adjacency to other buildings or potential buildings, and considering potentially adverse or beneficial effects on surrounding properties. Roof materials shall be non-reflective and earth colored. Where pitched roofs are allowed for structures of decorative trim, roofing materials and design are subject to approval or dis-approval in its sole judgment in each instance by the Approval Authority. 4 . 10 UTILITY SERVICES. All utility services, including telephone and electrical shall be located underground with power transformers , electrical and gas meters located, painted and screened as approved in each instance by the Approval Authority. Fire sprinkler water risers are to be located inside buildings. 4 . 11 GROUND SURFACE. On developed sites , ground surfaces sare to be dust-free with seeding, landscaping, or pavement. Parking areas are to be hard surfaced with approved paving materials and section, normally asphalt or concrete. 4 . 12 SITE GRADING AND EXCAVATION. Without supporting data from a professional soils engineer or geologist as to the ground stability, cut slopes are limited to 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) in areas of weathered till or loose sand and gravel, and slopes in filled or more stable areas are not to exceed 2. 1 : 1 or 3 : 1. 6/1/81 7- 4 . 13 Fences (except for screening of outdoor storage or equipment) are prohibited, and fences may not be closer to front or side Streets than actual building setbacks. ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE AND ENFORCEMENT 5. 01 SITE MAINTENANCE. Maintenance of pavement surfaces, structures, landscaping, storm drainage systems, and the like (on each site) shall be the individual re- sponsibility of each property owner and their tenant (s) . Maintenance shall include (but is not limited to) repainting or staining exterior surfaces at least each four (4 ) to six 6) years to approved colors and design, keeping equipment and material screens attractive and in good repair, with continued regular landscape maintenance (including mowing, fertilizing, trimming, and weeding) under continuing contract with a commercial contractor approved by the Approval Authority, prompt and regular trash and rubbish removal, sweeping, pavement sealing and resurfacing as needed with prompt repair of cracks and potholes, and regular cleaning of on-site storm water catch basins and on-site- detention ponds (if any) . p 5. 02 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE. Areas and improvements for the use or benefit of occupants in the business park which are not maintained by public entities may be maintained and repaired by the Approval Authority or its designee, including but not limited to the maintenance and repair of streets, sidewalks, trails, landscaping, storm drainage and other utilities and signs, with all direct costs pro-rated to property owners (including ONE VALLEY PLACE) on a pro-rata per acre ownership basis, billed and paid monthly;, and such amounts, with late payment interest charged at twelve percent 12%) per annum, and all costs and expenses of collection, including attorney ' s fees, shall be a lien against the interest of any such owner of any parcel of the Property. 5. 03 CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE. Construction materials may be stored on-site in a neat and orderly fashion. Sites and construction areas are to be maintained free and clear of rubbish and scrap accumulation, with any debris storage screened from public streets or nearby residential areas. On-site temporary construction trailers and shacks are permitted on the construction site so long as they are well maintained in good repair, finish, neat and orderly. Temporary storm water control measures required by the City of Renton are to be maintained by the construction contractor under the Site owner ' s authority, and are subject to enforcement by the Approval Authority. 6/1/81 8- 5. 04 ENFORCEMENT. a) If the owner of any parcel of the Property fails to maintain its site and improvements as required by these CC&R' s, or otherwise fails to comply with these CC&R' s, for a period of twenty (20) days (or 60 days in the instance of repainting or repaving) following written notice from the Approval Authority detailing such failure, the Approval Authority or its designee may enter upon the premises without liability, and cure such failure on a single or continuing basis and such owner shall be liable for all amounts expended in that regard, with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, and all costs and expenses of collection, including attorney' s fees, and all such amounts shall be a lien against the interest of any such owner in the Property. The Approval Authority may, but need not record notice of such lien or the one created under 5. 02 with the King County Office of Records and Elections. The lien created by this section and by 5. 02 shall be subordinate only to the liens of general real estate taxes and assessments, and the liens of bona fide first mortgages or trust deeds given for value and held by institutional investors , and may be foreclosed in a like manner as a real estate mortgage is foreclosed in Washington, but without redemption. b) All of the provisions of these CC&R' s shall run with the Property and each parcel thereof shall be enforceable in equity. So long as there is an Approval Authority, it shall have the exclusive right to enforce the provisions of these CC&R' s, without liability for failure to do so, except that each record owner of any parcel of the Property shall have the right to enforce provisions hereof to the extent then applicable to its property if the Approval Authority shall fail to do so within thirty (30) days after written request from any such owner. If an after there ceases to be an Approval Authority, each record owner of any parcel of the Property or an association formed by the record owners of a majority of the Property (a new Approval Authority" ) , shall have the right to enforce these CC&R' s then applicable to such owner ' s property without liability for failure to do so. In connection with any suit brought by the Approval Authority, or any owner, to enforce any of these CC&R' s the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney' s fees together with all related expenses and costs. 5. 05 APPOINTMENT. Upon taking title to any parcel within the office park, each owner irrevocably appoints the Approval Authority as its attorney-in-fact for the purpose of enforcing these CC&R' s. ARTICLE VI. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION APPROVAL 6. 01 PLAN SUBMITTAL. Prior to the submittal of plans and specifications to the City of Renton or other permit authority for approval, each owner or tenant shall 6/1/81 9- three (3) sets of those plans to the Approval Authority for its preliminary approval. Preliminary plans and specifications are to include a Site rough grading plan and a landscaping plan (indicating building locations, pavement and parking areas, landscaping, any sidewalks or trails, approximate locations and size of any trees removed from the site, the location and screening for trash containers, utility transformers and meters, any exterior storage, parking lot stripping, dimensions, area and Site coverage calculations, and materials) and building elevations also showing dimensions, material finishes and textures, and the paint or color scheme. Following preliminary plan approval but prior to submittal of construction working drawings for City permit or approval, each owner or tenant shall submit final working drawings and specifications for the Approval Authority' s approval, including all final Site civil and landscaping plans as well as building con- struction plans, and including any fire sprinkler systems, as well as samples of materials, finishes and colors. All submittals are to be made in at least three (3) sets, one to be retained by the Approval Authority. 6. 02 DESIGN REVIEW FEE. A fee of $20. 00 per blueprint shall accompany submittal of plans for-`the Approval Authority' s approval (for up to five plans) , and $10. 00 per blueprint sheet thereafter. 6. 03 APPROVAL SCHEDULE. Any plans or specifications submitted for the Approval Authority' s approval and not specifically approved, conditionally approved, changed, modified or disapproved by the Approval Authority within thirty (30) days of the applicant' s submittal shall be deemed approved. The Approval Authority may afford waivers or variances of any of these CC&R' s in connection with the approval of any plans, so long as such waivers or -variances will not be significantly detrimental to the overall environ- ment of the business park, or to any particular owner within the office park. 6. 04 LIABILITY. Neither ONE VALLEY PLACE nor ONE VALLEY PLACES' Successor, assigns, employees or agents shall be liable in damages to anyone submitting preliminary or operational plans and specifications for approval, or to any lessee or owner of any land affected by this Declaration or otherwise, by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the approval or disapproval or failure to approve any such plans and specifications, or enforcement of these CC&R' s. In acquiring title or interest to property in the office park, every owner or lessee agrees that ONE VALLEY PLACE, ONE VALLEY PLACES ' Successor, assigns, employees, or agents shall not suffer any liability or obligation for any damages whatsoever related to approval or disapproval of plans and specifications, and that they will not bring any action or suit to recover such damages. 6/1/81 10- ARTICLE VII. PURCHASE PRIORITY 7. 01 ONE VALLEY PLACE' S PRIORITY. No lot or property within the office park which does not contain a finished building structure (with a certificate of occupancy issued therefor) may be sold or resold to any third party without the owner having first provided written notice to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor in each instance, offering to sell the Property to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor, as the case may be, upon such terms and conditions as the owner is willing to accept, and ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor waiving in writing its right to purchase such property upon said terms and conditions. 7. 02 TIME LIMITATION. Notice of intent to sell such property and the acceptable terms shall be delivered to ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor, with a twenty (20) day response period. Failure by ONE VALLEY PLACE or ONE VALLEY PLACE' S Successor to respond with acceptance, or its written denial during the twenty (20) day period shall permit the then-owner to sell the same Property to any third party, on substantially the same basic terms and conditions. 7. 03 EXEMPTIONS. ONE VALLEY PLACE' S purchase priority shall not apply to any institutional investor, either acquiring or disposing of a lot in which it holds a mortgage interest, or to any duly advertised public sale having open bidding as provided by law. ONE VALLEY PLACE' S purchase priority shall not apply to any Property containing finished building structures for which an occupancy permit has been issued. All decisions of the Approval Authority shall be final, and none shall be subject to judicial or other review. ARTICLE VIII . MISCELLANEOUS 8. 01 TERM. These CC&R' s and every provision hereof, shall continue in full force and effect for a period of fifty 50) years from the date hereof, and shall be renewed automatically for successive five (5) year periods thereafter unless and until terminated as provided below. 8. 02 MODIFICATION. These CC&R' s or any provision thereof may be extended, modified or amended as to the whole or any part of the Property, as follows : The Approval Authority shall send written notice which notice shall be deemed received three (3) days after deposit in the United States mails (certified, return receipt requested) to all owners of any interest in any parcel of the Property (as evidenced by the names and addresses then showing on the real estate tax rolls; unless such owner has given the Approval Authority written notice of a different identity or address) specifying the precise changes to be effected to these CC&R' s. Unless within thirty (30) days of 6/1/81 11- such notice, owners of over fifty percent (50%) of the total acreage of the office park (excluding land dedicated to the public) have objected in writing to Approval Authority, Approval Authority may record notice of such extension, modification, or amendment, which notice shall include a certificate to the effect that compliance has been had with this Section 8. 02 and that it has not received objections from owners of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total acreage of the office park, which record notice shall be conclusive evidence of such facts and that these CC&R' s have been so extended, modified or amended. 8. 03 SEVERABILITY. i All of the CC&R' s hereunder shall be construed together, but if it is at any time held that any part or provision is invalid or unenforceable, no other provision of the CC&R' s shall be thereby affected or impaired. 8. 04 OWNER' S LIABILITY. Upon sale of a particular parcel or Property, the selling owner shall have no con- tinuing liability for obligations accruing subsequent to the date of conveyance, but such sale shall not relieve the new owner of the obligation to correct any continuing deficiencies or violations of these CC&R' s. DATED THIS DAY OF 19 ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES By: By: By: 6/1/81 12- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of 19 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared RICHARD LOMAS, DEAN ROCKEY, DARYL CONNELL, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said PARTNERSHIP for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at: 6/1/81 13- OF RFC THE CITY OF RENTON 0Ago' ' MUNICIPAL E3UILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9q 235- 2550P 94, 0 SE PI MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 3 , 1981 TO: FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: l ENVIRONMENTALF:./ INFORMATION/RESTST REZONE, BOWSER REZONE, AND ONE VALLEY PLACE The Environmental Review Committee considered a substantial amount of information related to the impacts from the proposed developments. Total impacts from these three projects were considered together and the resulting information was of such a volume that it is more reasonable to submit it to you under separate memorandum instead of in each of the files. The mitigating measures placed on the proposal can be appealed until Monday , June 8, 1981 . S/9i 1F 4' 7-z-e- G l t !mot".,--• 2<c .r. - / ..?4 7/d / e rL OF ! A. I THE CITY OF RENTON4$ 0. z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 Z sea BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTo 9. 0 235- 2550 94, D SEPlEs3 P May 28, 1981 Mr. Daryl Connell One Valley Place Properties 2691 168th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98009 Re: Application for rezone from G to P-1 , Public Use of approximately 11 .7 acres, File No. R-047-81 ; Application for a preliminary commercial planned unit development to allow the construction of approximately 140,000 square feet of office and commercial complex on same 11 . 7 acre site, File No. PPUD-032-81 ; Application for a preliminary plat to accompany the proposed rezone and commercial planned unit development of the 11 . 7 acres into 12 lots, File No. PP-044-81 ; property located south of Valley General Hospital, southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street. Dear Mr. Connell: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 31 , 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for June 9, 1981 , at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, , ( Y Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB:gh Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Michele Roe being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the Chief Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Hearing R65.57 as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the 25 day of jMay 19 81 , and ending the day of 19 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $29v97 which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. 1 Chief Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 day of XNay , 19 81 Notary Public in and for the Sta of Washington, residing at I p1t rKi g County. Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955, Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 Public Notice Public NoticeresidentialofapproximatelysouthofValleyGeneralHos-8.7 acres, file number R- pital, southwest of the in-125-80;property located on tersection of Talbot RoadthewestsideofTalbotRoadSouthandS.W.43rd Street.South approximately 1,000 5. ONE VALLEY PLACEfeetsouthofS.W. 43rd PROPERTIESStreet. BOWSER Application for a preliminary2. ApFlicatio for rezone from plat to accompany the pro- Public Notice G to R-2, low density multi- caSeplanned and develo r- ALL INTERESTEDSAIDPETITIONS PER pie family residential of ap- ment of 11.7 acres into 12 ARE INVITEDONS SAID TOBEPE-proximately 8.5 acres, file Tots,file number Pp-044-81; SENTE THE BE PUBLICnumberR-135-80; property property located south of ON JUN 9, AT PUBLIClocatedonthewestsideofValleyGeneralHospital, 1iEA811R1NGAT 9:00 A.M. TOTalbotRoadSouthapproxi- southwest of the intersection EXPRESS THEIR OPIN-mately 1/4 mile south of S.W. of Talbot Road South and IONS.43rd Street. S.W. 43rd Street.3. ONE VALLEY PLACE Legal descriptions of the DAVID R. CLEMENSPROPERTIESfilesnotedaboveareonfile Acting Planning Dailyi Re-Application for rezone from in the Renten PlanningDo- Published inthe 25,G to P-1, Public Use of partment. cord9 Chronicle May 25,NOTICE OF approximately 11.7 acres, 1981. R6557 PUBLIC HEARING file number R-047-81; pro-ENTON LAND USE perty located south of ValleyFARINGEXAMINERGeneralHospital,southwestRENTON, WASHINGTON of the intersection of TalbotAPUBLICHEARING .Road South and S.W.43rdWILLBEHELDBYTHEStreet. RENTON LAND USE 4. ONE VALLEY PLACEHEARINGEXAMINERATPROPERTIESHISREGULARMEETINGApplicationforapreliminaryINTHECOUNCILCHAMB- commercial planned unit de-ERS, CITY HALL, RE- velopment to allow the con-NTQN,WASHINGTON,ON struction of approximatelyJUNE9,1981,AT 9:00 A.M. 140,000 square feet of officeTOCONSIDER'THE FOL- and commercial complex asLOWINGPETITIONS:support activities for Valley1. DAVE BEST General Hospital on a 11.7Applicationforrez.:no from acre site,file number PPUD-G to R-3, multiple family 032-81; .property located a i op-4_ 0•6.0.--k rtz)L0.4.4... 7-4\ 4 f1.71. :-.., 4-.-.4r-79il i \\ ,/ i i \ ',.. /d 1P I-I ri 1-1 (7).")ThA I"-1'' it"...;`• 17714 rs-1 .rn i ; I 1 I i‘ ‘.2- 1 i it F. ; ,41 :-.. .-„-. ., 1 1 , . , 1 , i 1 , . , - ,-, I :,-,-1 f.,. k 1./ ...-i -- . 11 LI L.! Li Li ,,'q 1 1 Li LI Li ''L. i Li .1 \,„.;..i ir't., , .. GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDEESS: PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL, SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND S.W. 43RD STREET. i 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPF.RTY OWNERS OF , i, i; ,074nkiuElLuk,PI i PnZi f rr.\- tl ,, Pk Itr 71 . .I.:30' I.: 17:',..1 1 t TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNiCPAL BUILDING ON JUNE 9, J.981 BEGINNING AT _,......9.,Q0 ' A.M. , CONCERNING ITEM iZi REZONE FROM 'G' TO P-1, PUBLIC USE OF APPROXIMELY 11,7 ALRES:- FILE #R-047-81) 7A:k1 *. ..7s7i PRELIMINARY COMERC'tt PLANED UNIT DEVELOPillf; ',CONSTRUCTION OF OFFICE AND4!.kt,t• 44 i 4 44/4 ' ' '' , i.,... ''' 1). :•'.40- 'N''N,ZZZO,1•41k,I, NI;i:w_mac tat. CO LEX) (FILE ifiTUD-0327-81) PP , 6416t, AL.] ,,, ,,, ITE A_ 4,. , . 41: yl'it4. 41 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TO ACCOMANY TIE REZOiE AND PRI) •tti, oeiv Alf tl,,,o4r,)w,'.4 '•APPLICATIONS; 11.7 ACRES IN70 12 LOTS; (FILE #PP-044-81)t..11..L.....;.... t. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HAS ISSUED A FINAL DECLARATION OF, NOt-SIGNIFIcANCE WITH CONDITIONS, ANY APPEALS SHOULD BE DIRECUID TO THE HEARING EXAMINER BY : :00 PM.; JUNE 8, 1981 -f. 1. ,, 3FORFLIFITHEHINFORMATIONCALL2382550 1 : . '* M tEMOVED WITHOUT PR PER AUTHORIZATION1414',NOTICE ,INOT TO BE ; ti PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ,:;v REARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 9, 1981 APPLICANT: •ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES FILE NUMBER: R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , and PP-044-81 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to P-1 together with a preliminary planned unit development to permit the construction of approximately 140, 000 square feet of office and commercial space. Also sought is approval of a 12-lot preliminary plat on the subject site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: DEAN M. ROCKEY DARYL CONNELL RICHARD LOMAS 2. Applicant : ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) South of Valley General hospital and southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 11 . 7 acres 6. Access :Via Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street 7. Existing Zoning: G, General Classifica,- tion District, minimum lot size 35, 000 square feet. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G, R-3, P-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-public, Greenbelt 10. Notification: The applicant was " notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on May 25, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 28, 1981 . C. T ISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 3031 of May 17, 1976, at which time the present zoning classification was applied. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , PP-044-81 JUNE 9, 1981 PAGE TWO D. Pl, SICK :ACKGROUI D: 1 . Topography: The subject site rises from west to east at slopes ranging from 2-10%. 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) . Perme- ability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, row crops , and for urban devel- opment. 3 . Vegetation: Numerous alder and some Douglas Fir are found on the subject site with the ground cover composed principally of scrub brush. 4 . Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site ( May 28, 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is presently undeveloped. Valley General Hospital is north of the property with a United Way agency and several clinics to the east and south. The East Valley Freeway (SR-167) lies to the west. E. o I,ty n::* OOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are a mixture of clinic and other medical related uses along with some scattered single family housing. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : A 16" water main extends east-west on S.W. 43rd Street adjacent to the subject site while an 8" sanitary sewer runs north-south on Talbot Road South. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route 145 operates along S.W. 43rd Street adjacent to the subject site. 4 . Schools : Not applicable. 5. Recreation : The subject site is approximately 12 miles south of Talbot Hill Park. In addition, the grounds of Valley General Hospital may provide some recreational opportunities. G. APPLIC'^• e,LE SECTIONS OF THE SING CODE: 1 . Section 4-710, Public Use District H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CONIlP I:NCI E NSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, 1965, Com- mercial, page 11 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , PP-044-81 JUNE 9 , 1981 PAGE THREE 2 . Subdivision Ordinance, Sec. 9-1106-2, Preliminary Plat Requirements 3. Building Regulations, Chapter 27, PUD Ordinance I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils , and increase storm water runoff and traffic and noise levels in the area. Specific measures to mitigate these impacts have been developed by the Environmental Review Committee. 2. Population/Employment : Increased opportunities for employment will result in development and com- pletion of the proposed facilities. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4 . Social: Opportunities for social interaction will increase with construction and operation of the proposed complex. 5. Traffic : See file for Brown' s field studies. J. ENVIPioNMENTAL AS ESS T/TRRES1:OLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee on May 25, 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. 6. City of Renton Parks Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: The proposed rezone, commercial planned unit development and the subdivision are intertied in concepts and practical applications . However, the analysis breaks the discussion down into the three separate components. REZONE: (ANALYSIS) 1 . The rezone request from G, General Use Classification, to P-1 , Public use, is consistent with the Comprehen- sive Plan designation of Public/Quasi-Public for the subject site, thus complying with Section 4-3014 (C) (1 ) (b) . 2 . The subject site has not been specifically considered for rezoning, since it was annexed into the City in May of 1976. The Comprehensive Plan was amended in 1980 to reflect the current Public/Quasi-Public land use classification. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , PP-044-81 JUNE 9 , 1981 PAGE FOUR 3. During the last ten years, major public improvements to Valley General Hospital and S.W. 43rd Street have resulted in stimulating office development for medical support facilities in the general vicinity. The City of Renton has taken into account the fact that Valley General Hospital is a major regional hospital for the south end of King County. These improvements along with the private developments , mainly in King County to the east of the subject site, suggest that criteria number three applies . Section 4-3014 (C) ( 1 ) (c) ) . 4 . The environmental impacts associated with the proposed rezone were evaluated in light of the accompanying planned unit development and subdivision. Therefore, it would appear that the rezone should be limited specifically to the design limits of the P.U.D. However, the actual mitigating measures , which affect primarily traffic, were constructed to slide with the intensity of the development. A known present traffic figure was compared to the traffic estimate of the Comprehensive Plan environmental impact statement for 1990. This, in turn, was analyzed in relationship to the known improvements under the state of the art for specific intersections and prorated over the anticipated traffic volumes. Thus, it is unnecessary to tie the rezone to the P.U.D. for environmental purposes. The P-1 Zone requires that site plan approval be complied with for any private developments within this zone. REZONE: RECOMMENDATION) It is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council that the rezone request, File No. R-047-81 , of One Valley Place Properties be approved. PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ANALYSIS) 1 . The proposed commercial planned unit development generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Public/Quasi-Public Use. The P.U. D. application is intended to meet the following design goals : a) Variety of professional and accessory retail uses consistent with the hospital facility. b) Campus-style circulation (vehicular and pedestrian) providing for an informal but functional scope. c) Common design theme, including architectural landscaping and street-scape. d) Common access to parking to encourage pedestrian rather than vehicular movements within the development. e) Maximization of view corridors and minimization of view blockage from adjacent uses. f) Provision for a variety of structure heights consistent with the overall project. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , PP-044-81 JUNE 9 , 1981 PAGE FIVE 2. Not all of the anticipated uses are specifically allowed outright in the proposed P-1 , Public Use Zone. However, the general office, restaurant, and banking uses are allowed in the B-1 , Business Use Zone, and these can be conditionally approved in the P-1 Zone. This review would be a duplication of the use and site review required as a part of the Final P.U.D. Therefore, the uses as proposed by the developer should be allowed upon approval of a Final P.U.D. Plan, and not be required to comply with any conditional use review procedures. The P.U.D. Ordinance, Section 4-2706, allows the final approval of a Planned Unit Development to superimpose the requirements of the specifically approved Planned Unit Development on the underlying zone regulations. 3 . Most of the staff concerns have been addressed in the review by the Environmental Review Committee. However, detailed engineering plans will have to be submitted and approved for all on and off-site improvements. Their comments are attached for your review. 4 . The proposed design focuses on internal streets and a point of access to S.W. 43rd Street. The applicant is proposing a 40-foot right-of-way and roadway section for Valley Place, except at the entrance, where it would be 50 feet. This allows adequate room for public services and traffic gen- erated from both the residential and commercial developments. That portion of Valley Place running east and west is designed at 60 feet of right-of-way with a boulevard approach. The Engineering and Traffic Engineering Divisions have determined that this is adequate to serve the project. The access to S.W. 43rd Street is directly opposite the entrance to Valley General Hospital. Placement of another traffic signal so close to S.W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road South is not advisable; and, therefore, traffic movements should be limited by the installation of a traffic triangle to allow right turns only, 5 . The P-1 Zone limits the height of a building to four stories or 40 feet. The applicant proposes an office structure of six stories as a design alternative allowed under the P.U. D. process, where adequate setbacks and buffers have been proposed to blend the scale of the building into the total development. 6. Another objective of the P.U.D. is to allow the creation of common parking areas for design flexi- bility. However, it should be pointed out that as each phase of the Final P.U. D. is approved, the parking required for that specific phase must be met in such a manner that the total P.U.D. achieves the minimum required parking. 7. The proposal complies with all other standards of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES R-047-81 , PPUD-032-81 , PP-044-81 JUNE 9, 1981 PAGE SIX 8 . Although an architectural theme has not been set, each phase of the P.U. D. should be so designed as to provide continuity of materials , colors, textures and landscaping treatment. PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: RECOMMENDATION) It is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council that the preliminary commercial planned unit development, File No. PPUD-032-81 , be approved subject to the condition that each phase of the Final Planned Unit Development: 1 . Will comply with all appropriate City standards, primarily the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 2. Common access to parking through the P.U.D. is assured by covenant or other legal document. 3 . That maintenance of common access, utilities, open space or other facilities is assured. 4 . Shall achieve a common architectural theme. PRELIMINARY PLAT: ANALYSIS) 1 . The preliminary plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Public/Quasi-Public for the subject site and the proposed zoning reclassification to P-1 , Public Use, and the Preliminary Commercial Planned Unit Development. 2. The preliminary plat follows the Schematic Site Plan and allows for common parking, circulation, and landscaping areas through the covenants. The right-of-way proposed for Valley Place is 40 feet in the interior and 50 feet at the intersections following the provision of Sec. 4-2709-1-C. However, there is the possibility that the subdivision could be filed prior to the approval of the Final P.U. D. on the first phase. It is important that the Final P.U.D. on the first phase be filed first, because it will then set the architectural, parking, land- scaping, circulation, and general land use theme of the Planned Unit Development. PRELIMINARY PLAT: RECOMMENDATION) It is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat, File No. PP-044-81 , subject to approval of Final Planned Unit Development plans for phase one of the development. i[, 1\ 1\' t. ,e•e.I•., , III ICI:. l III r SR-1 as - )9 to !. • )a •• ). a. ,,z i' a, 55 , j .. . .e l .f .• . X. ex a so . , - . . , . . - ., .. . .. 7 T. j i v I i 19 30 N St S, \ D J71 9 iPf1° t .tS I S.Cu a 2e.ra,\ f} 1.0 .-_- I-- _ -_ 1 1.1. N 19 tC a till'1.:I I I i re 4•.••••., 11• 1 P16, 3 t ZONING f P-i CITY LIMITS ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES REZONE REQUEST G" GENERAL USE CLASSIFICATION TO P-1, PUBLIC USE R-047-81 PRELIMINARY COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPUD-032-81 PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-044-81 APPLICANT ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA 11.7 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 43rd Street & Talbot Road South EXISTING ZONING G" General Use Classification EXISTING USE Vacant/Single Family Residence PROPOSED USE Office/Commercial Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public COMMENTS I K PREL/M/NARY PLAT OF ONE VALLEY PLACE. w jam; `- -"` SEC• 9/, TWP 29N,R5fWM SCALP'doN0I lt> P tcto• w \"'A++• - PRIM.STATE HWY,NOS - I ti 1 KFl, YALLEY 'RN)!wraccr• " Pp„y 24', _ - _ - T.p - "ea a/O/M/NG Cw.veR SNIPS Rf, y II de rrN.f•eedJ 0 •q ew a .` r• r': _ rr' `a"n:.. I...s.,..i 17"---Dsrepssod f- •T. G. r cwiirnt -s-y' rr.. o`„'. _ w/9.etteloo Y '_ { J4 V; ilt , 1 •w n Q="- -- 1 \ / o \ '1r\ 1 E___ 1 i. , JO,KV• rA-411,=,-.1." r.11----------- t • N. w n \ . E r i I /Mrgw/ s COMPOSITE LEGAL DESCR/Pi JD N O \1 I O ..i-- J ) i 1-7 T. --I 7/se ode 0//oy/ne NC*el Mr sw ea,olfre-NEYe/nsruds,•wne S I ,, IfdMs ^ dIIoO II 't 1 Ad dsIAt//o//tx NW*o/bx J)VG dine NE Y,/r•:J rwws,•aaf tom• W K \f, • ®\ yl O 7 - / - / O '-1 lne/portion e!/he Nci/R,7r of/he.:ou/h//0//ht$cv///Y}of/e i ten I / // ar sss A*J/rees/eo1Sec/a,J/, Ted,s//p YINO,/pApve$Fes »'M; rs.I=o' 1'aq We/s/Cb.rn/ylfkuO Na M.tnowrl na//.t A,i.Rrl/M,RYO: I ` r:' Q; 1. fxCEPT/ne Sov/h/Si.A7 jar/e!/ne a-••t'Z t0/er/:AND I• rr 7:7? iy: I Q) CxCE'PT/ne Nedi,/1t 00 tee/oldie tn_y lio l.-e///Arc o/;A60 e fr XCfPT nailPor//on coreeenncd/or©,,,roil 5/e/e Ad,, eei; I sae/n EII S/recl rn A'iu/•,Crn!.n by5/s/e ay vr iir 9•an rn• . \ NI 1 I ;'4 j A'v g Lbvn/y Superrcr Lour/Course Na S73J56; 1 r,o•0 s \ , I ' xi O vrR•!iC/lf/Cana/tows/me?Dy/ne S/7,a o/lessiungior,e! M\.--•- • rgnJ o/occrts/e S/s/e N,yiw•ey ono'o//Db/,v ew end sir, of \ J/ 'ae-' A•decrse erlleiW In King Lbvnyr.5irrxi Cvr/Ca'r cAh D IISf. 1 "` n NI I De Nlertey'W.Gen-•©Lamas„tr., DINNERS Nrrlc e.'e.I Y:9,v-A..Sr PI,N1e r„PPP, ti,iv ?r 'w f q ,y O '4' \r . N. •`'.t, -\ b,\ti I I: iaa•»/ TOTAL AREA IN PLAT • //JO Acres 7t!s,, I ,II PdRCENT OF LAND//! STREETS • /J. I ZONING 0• /'roPosed Pf 1I .I LAND USE-- - -Prefer/Ay cb u..r/aped 1 I II 1 I e I I t II I I mat ...o. I. • IW1 i ram_ '--' l Tf. CIVIL LII IYLL*4 LJMD VYtf LTOI Ca.o/y,ftw N.*') TALBOT - ROAD r"FT.,. i W. t-._. is ' 1 Revision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: peoD. 032- st ovE vAf.L.P. Y ras a. - po. a44.. _ n C PQb L C± .A•a.Q, , - [4•e, I1. (,c gp,oc n Location: 4.4. ' €—l4 :Q ad,o.t To-.Qa a cam„ _ Applicant:cpa--oyf Loosoe-t1 7-"Vic- r— Awar r Couve(L Cole Ourr TO:public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 1/'s 8 1 Tr c Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division e4,0 Fire 'Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. Ot 1- Ate(' I I4,6 031, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: =/-'//C74= Approved 'pproved with Conditions ® Not Approved 7o /4f-E'T /rr._ Cvtvii'77'O N S 4-s Na- 2 3 °iv SG6l C i c Si CZ: pi_i hV, Fiat[: f9 ? -7-frir%t'A (° G//7 led t1) DATE: // /7A, Signature of Director, or Au -hor ed Representative a REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: tiTiC '7-( Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved GZic r ,cL. C© Divoloc i- S l)o-p Dx Sc1418 Nric Sc cpbq to 1 tpeK.'- it v c. (or L 1.7 y 5 -n ` i , 4 ,,, L-----_.DATE: 4/z 1/ ) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative G rREVIEWINGDEPARTMENT/D. SION: i9G,c NEG 2/NG 11. % , Approved f/%t Approved with Conditions No_ t Appro evd i ' / f /:!-t f s> /%<-; 1/' i. cr2n4r4S . celuiree/ `b F Conf' Ee/4 %or) . C/ M4 I/i 6 h/ihe efri'7e eds 4 -gsef,,4/ Trck« eji°iYes.f ai. a 4l4-I, Sll ' Le vr& /i jeer' a S,SSeScme-nf cast 6C h-7 Q e l 7 e` e 1 a Nc 2A•y4zigd,ld1.,S/ M474 ne. eN 7+) !G Stt/e•-€1- he A'rG wC . 9iL// pre mot,/ . et--, cs]y- g'---'cat DATE: 7j.7 /,,/ Signature of Director or Authorized Rep sentative RE'lIL:i1NG D :PAR'Tri .r:r,•DIVIS10N: 0App C c with Conditi 4i1rovi ,i, ,P i i: %r ons Plot Approved'• '. ryeIst, .) a:; ,1.t, ' t.A.. ,, 1 .' 1 ' 1,`!'i.:A'','' ,-u^ M.•tfw y' ' 'f.° i.!`'a? Y i,,,,,tad tom;. 4 / , r,' 4. e r i i t. 3trr S? i ' e l 2. w / ! tl:7 tes//1 diet/1., :' t ry;Y ci .-w ,, 4,. ,.. r if.- .,//i 'Gfi...r .c1 l{lI 6r',l r.e,a,,y`.. „ iJ,rt,s itt'p.e;;d c1411.,A'A.*rt, ,&c.,'r:,s.t., .".0 ,.,,/',„ z.) +rf ^• e. .y;»d;; S:''>! 4r„ x%J,,df ,4e... Id l fl.••+,d., ai. f.,I/ 9 ..., , . ! , 7 f t . 1, r.. VIdCtm.C„ 1 R f•',,.r.d 1`..)644 . +N ,7'. d1-•--1 c,„e,i 1::. 1_'t4.fit/r: .f I•. lti ,bj.a *° a Y, 1 : SiK;na ture'of ec zo ze UATE ` ' Dtr n n 1 ticr zed FZepresen'ytative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \-7«..r `s ig Approved [I Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved C A. 1- 7 T -:- -re,.vim 4:.---....f ,..c) •1 i -.,2._` ,z,.. 'e°.t"`"_ e4 Qom...-t-e - y o y_ yam— t- -- - ... ,+-a-- , QAr'- tI1._eA / --,,,--`-a_-1 W f// iQ•-'\E !^"'"/' t4-O_ ' Jam-. ---'-'C---'_'G- !_'''-- c 14.La_ Lli a ....fit - ——. 0-Q L `---<_t Z .5. (2_1L ti k-r _ e..».1.- ..-t-.t-_,,._..._-..-e (3o- 6-2 A--.- c S'.C.., -a-- c. e:- :1'4: 7- 2.....,cs,....4.. '.,...........kii -IL_ -1=S—L-....- c.,_-,.-12.c..... , f -/21DATE: 7 Si nature of Direct-or, r Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions No t] Approved fi1,L e. ` - - - !/`,tr ( d- ac''tc/ bl-a--c-f• f ---/;4 ---e-e.-e'ee-ems=•-- , f l J Xi—zr-'' DATE: ` r Signature df Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI )N: Police 12 Approved (Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved See attached memo Lt.(- , ssn—DATE: 4-6;81_Signature of Director or Authorized Representative MEMORANDUM To : Planning Dept. From: Lt. D.R. Persson Re; One Valley Place In reviewing the proposed development of One Valley Place I find that the development will have a significant impact on police servicesintwoareas. The first area is repponse to crimes in progress and/orcrimesthathaveoccuredprior, the second area is in the responsetocallsfortrafficcongestionand/or accidents. The two areas canbemitigatedtolessentheneedforpoliceservicesinseveralways. The ways are: 1) Police services: A) install security locks on all doors. 13) install security windows on all window openings. C) properly placed lighting in the parking lots ( all lighting to be placed on the exterior of the parking area so it shines in on the buildings. ) I)) large address numbers on all Luildiny::. E) all units/business' s have intrusion alarms pre-wired.F) additional police officer 2) Traffic problems: A) traffic signal be installed at S.W. 43rd & Hwy #167 off ramps prior to occupancy of any buildings. L) traffic signal at S.W. 43rd & Talbot Rd. be updated tc opperate more efficently. C) no left turn be allowed from Valley Place onto S.W.43 channelization be installed to prevent this turning movement & allow ambulance access to Valley Gen. Hosp.D) both sides of Talbot Rd. be improved along the entire width of the development. E) the need for a pedestrian overpass to Valley General Hosp. be assessed, and if needed developer should install. If the above conditions are met I believe that this will be a benefit to the area, and actually help solve some of the problems in the area. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-047-81 PPtJD-032-81 PP-044-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-033-81 Description of* Proposal: Request for a rezone of 11 . 7 acres from G" to P-1 , Public Use along with a commercial planned unit development and 12-lot subdivision to allow the construction of approximately 140,000 square feet of office and commercial complex. Proponent: One Valley Place Properties/Daryl Connell: Location of Proposal:South of Valley General Hospital, southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street. Lead Agency: Renton Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee , on the following dates : April 15, 1981 May 6, 1981 May 13, 1981 May 20, 1981 Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-033-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: April 14 , 1981 2) Applications : Rezone R-047-81 Preliminary P.U.D. PPUD-032-81 Preliminary Plat PP-044-81 3) Correspondence: Dated To From May 15, 1981 Daryl Connell Christopher Brown, PE May 20, 1981 Files Environmental Review ' Committee 4) Recommendations: A declaration of non-significance was recommended by the Engineering and Utilities Divisions and the Park, Police and Planning Departments. A declaration of significance was recommended by the Fire Department. k-047-8i PPUD-032-81 PP-044-81 ECF-033-81 This De 'laration of Non-Significance is provisioned on the following mitigating measures : 1 1 ) The mitigation of off-site traffic impacts specifically at ,the intersections of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street and S.W. 43rd Street and SR 167 as outlined in the memorandum of May 20, 1981 . Mitigation is to be payment of ' $15 per vehicle trip generation at time of building permit application. (If the cost of improvements ha increased, the mitigation fee will be recomputed at the time of building construction. ) i Signatues : nald . Nelson vid R. lemeis, Acting Buildin Director Planning Director ht_._P/ 4 fil cl/r._ Ri and C. Houghton,,jActing Public orks Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: May 25, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: June 7 , 1981 i co is Piet c4 " C4 ~4 F4X1, co co 04 so lo 10 yz zp MA 77, 14 rz tt. Kevision 3/1981 372 7/8/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Applicati on:IVEihnideMieY Pair II y kavv's) O Ia. cbMM fr O l ids Location: S. art U4 ey_414. H4l- s 3SLt/l! I Wie 1/Siref 0/1 s a(6 erf Ro*d So v'fJt tff 9. =4 t Applicant: R. Le v,tts 1 D. Rei tty_,Dt_CipAile#r TO : Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: a 141goUtilitiesEng. Division OFire Department Parks Department Buil ' Department olice Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 6/248/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved D Approved with Conditions Not Approved LT. D.R. PE l'.‘ ?"/ON DATE: 6/1/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 3/z7/81 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: fPRE ammo y P T t esovv-c0 n -C Ce*x rite re;aL Ibeis Location: S• p A_11,efeeAlrA t We-FAt jj6Ate,weileevi s Tay C Rea41 e s 54 Applicant: p, Lamdg a D f i TO :Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: a ict) 1UtilitiesEng. Division Fi re D artn,ent arks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 124 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ce-K- S Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 0 . DATE: W31SignreofDirectororAutrizedRepresentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 9, 1981 , AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . DAVE BEST Appliction for rezone from G to R-3, multiple family residential of approximately 8. 7 acres , file number R-125-80; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street . 2. FRED BOWSER Application for rezone from G to R-2, low density multiple family residential of approximately 8. 5 acres, file number R-135-80; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1/4 mile south of S.W. 43rd Street . 3 . ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES Application for rezone from G to P-1 , Public Use of approximately 11 . 7 acres, file number R-047-81 ; property located south of Valley General Hospital , southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street . 4. ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES Application for a preliminary commercial planned unit development to allow the construction of approximately 140,000 square feet of office and commercial complex as support activities for Valley General Hospital on a 11 . 7 acre site, file number PPUD-032-81; property located south of Valley General Hospital , southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street . 5. ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES Application for a preliminary plat to accompany the proposed rezone and commercial planned unit development of 11 .7 acres into 12 lots , file number PP-044-81 ; property located south of Valley General Hospital , southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street . Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 9, 1981 , AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: May 25, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the Stale of Washington residing in King County, on the 15th day of May. 1981 . SIGNED: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : DURWOOD BLOOD (ECF-601-80 and ECF-001-81) Application for a rezone from R-1 to R-2 along with a special permit to construct ten townhouse condo- minium units; property lying west of Edmonds Avenue N , E . between N . E . 13th Street and N. E . 14th Street , The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects : PIETRO ' S GOLD COAST PIZZA PARLOR (ECF-048-81) PIETRO ' S CORPORATION) Application for building permit to construct an approxi- mate 4300 sq. ft . wood frame, single story building to house a family restaurant; property located on the south side of N . E . Sunset Boulevard, east of Whitman Court N . E . DAVE. BEST (ECF-634-80) Application for rezone from G to R-3 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approxi- mately 1 , 000 feet south of S . W. 43rd Street . FRED BOWSER (ECF-033-81) Application for rezone from 'G to R-2 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approxi- mately 1/4 mile south of S . W. 43rd Street . ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES (ECF-033-81) Applications for rezone from G to P-i to allow development of office complex and preliminary plat approval for 12-lot commercial plat; property located south of Valley General Hospital, southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S .W. 43rd Street . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Depart- ment, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 234-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by June 8, 1981 Published: May 25, 1981 OF J o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 9q'eO SEPS E P May 21 , 1981 MEMORANDUM TO : Files FROM: Environmental Review Committee RE : ERC POLICY STATEMENT/TRAFFIC IMPACTS RESULTING FROM GENERAL GROWTH AROUND VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL During the next ten-year period, the land in the vicinity of Valley General Hospital will undergo substantial development . At the present time , water and sewer services are under expan- sion to service this anticipated growth . However , specific traffic impacts can only be estimated through a comparison of projected traffic volumes suggested in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Southeast Renton Comprehensive Plan and recent field work done by Christopher Brown , P .E . The specific traffic improvements considered necessary include (1) signal and lane modifications at S .W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road, estimated at 50 , 000 ; (2) new signal installation at S .W. 43rd Street and SR 167 , estimated at $110 , 000; and ( 3) widening of S .W. 43rd Street adjacent to the hospital , estimated at $40 , 000 . Total anticipated traffic improvements would cost approximately 200 , 000 . In determining an equitable pro rata cost for new development to make these necessary improvements , the difference in anti- cipated daily traffic volumes and the present traffic volumes were considered on the segment of S .W. 43rd Street between Talbot Road and SR 167 . The field studies of Mr . Brown showed a present volume of 30 , 040 on an average week day , while the Comprehensive Plan E . I . S . anticipated a volume of 38, 825 trips in 1990 . The increase is therefore anticipated at 8 , 785 trips per day over this segment . A cost figure of $22 . 77 per vehicle trip is generated, when the estimated cost of $200 , 000 is divided by the anticipated increase in traffic volume of 8, 785 trips . However , this fee is not realistic , when we consider that the intersections are impacted by growth outside of the City of Renton ' s control . Therefore , the Environmental Review Committee has determined not to burden the developer within the City of Renton with the total cost of traffic improvements . It has taken the Memorandum to l es May 21 , 1981 Page Two official position that on these specific improvements that the cost should be $15 . 00 per vehicle trip, shared by this sub-area, and the remaining one-third from other developments contributing traffic to this intersection . 7/ 0(6, 1' David R. Clemens, chard Houghton, Acting Planning Director Acting Public Works erector 4i4N/5/414,17. „// Ronald Nelson Building Director Files : List, then add to as necessary. 1 . Best Rezone 2 . Bowser Rezone 3 . One Valley Place Rezone 4 . Ive Clinic FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-U47-81 PPUD-032-81 PP-044-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-033-81 Description of Proposal: Request for a rezone of 11 . 7 acres from G" to P-1 , Public Use along with a commercial planned unit development and 12-lot subdivision to allow the construction of approximately 140, 000 square feet of office and commercial complex. Proponent: One Valley Place Properties/Daryl Connell Location of Proposal:South of Valley General Hospital, southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street. Lead Agency: Renton Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on the following dates : April 15, 1981 May 6 , 1981 May 13, 1981 May 20, 1981 Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-033-8'i are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: April 14 , 1981 2) Applications : Rezone R-047-81 Preliminary P.U.D. PPUD-032-81 Preliminary Plat PP-044-81 3) Correspondence: Dated To From May 15, 1981 Daryl Connell Christopher Brown, PE May 20, 1981 Files Environmental Review Committee 4) Recommendations : A declaration of non-significance was recommended by the Engineering and Utilities Divisions and the Park, Police and Planning Departments. A declaration of significance was recommended by the Fire Department. s,_K-047-8 i PP1JD-032-81 PP-044-81 ECF-033-81 This Declaration of Non-Significance is provisioned on the following mitigating measures : 1 ) The mitigation of off-site traffic impacts specifically at the intersections of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street and S.W. 43rd Street and SR 167 as outlined in the memorandum of May 20, 1981 . Mitigation is to be payment of $15 per vehicle trip generation at time of building permit application. (If the cost of improvements has increased, the mitigation fee will be recomputed at the time of building construction. ) Signatures : d.-1017 nald G. Nelson id R. leme , Acting Building Director Planning Director cc-r/L-Li - --4-/ Riiiard C. Houghton, Acting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: May 25, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: June 7, 1981 OF RED o THE CITY OF RENTON 4 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 co• 235- 2550 09gTFo SEPT' P May 21 , 1981 MEMORANDUM TO : Files FROM: Environmental Review Committee RE : ERC POLICY STATEMENT/TRAFFIC IMPACTS RESULTING FROM GENERAL GROWTH AROUND VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL During the next ten-year period, the land in the vicinity of Valley General Hospital will undergo substantial development . At the present time , water and sewer services are under expan- sion to service this anticipated growth. However , specific traffic impacts can only be estimated through a comparison of projected traffic volumes suggested in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Southeast Renton Comprehensive Plan and recent field work done by Christopher Brown , P. E . The specific traffic improvements considered necessary include ( 1) signal and lane modifications at S .W. 43rd Street and Talbot Road, estimated at 50 , 000; (2 ) new signal installation at S .W. 43rd Street and SR 167 , estimated at $110 , 000; and ( 3) widening of S .W. 43rd Street adjacent to the hospital , estimated at $40 , 000 . Total anticipated traffic improvements would cost approximately 200 , 000 . In determining an equitable pro rata cost for new development to make these necessary improvements , the difference in anti- cipated daily traffic volumes and the present traffic volumes were considered on the segment of S .W. 43rd Street between Talbot Road and SR 167 . The field studies of Mr . Brown showed a present volume of 30, 040 on an average week day , while the Comprehensive Plan E . Z . S . anticipated a volume of 38, 825 trips in 1990 . The increase is therefore anticipated at 8, 785 trips per day over this segment. A cost figure of $22 . 77 per vehicle trip is generated, when the estimated cost of $200 , 000 is divided by the anticipated increase in traffic volume of 8 , 785 trips . However , this fee is not realistic , when we consider that the intersections are impacted by growth outside of the City of Renton ' s control . Therefore , the Environmental Review Committee has determined not to burden the developer within the City of Renton with the total cost of traffic improvements . It has taken the Memorandum to L __es May 21 , 1981 Page Two official position that on these specific improvements that the cost should be $15 . 00 per vehicle trip, shared by this sub-area, and the remaining one-third from other developments contributing traffic to this intersection . 7i David R . Clemens, chard Houghton , Acting Planning Director Acting Public Works erector W1402,e......" i Ronald Nelson Building Director Files : List, then add to as necessary. 1 . Best Rezone 2 . Bowser Rezone 3 . One Valley Place Rezone 4 . Ive Clinic ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 6 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM OLD BUSINESS: ECF-033-81 ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES PP-044-81 R. Lomas, D. Rockey, D. Connell) R-047•-81 Applications for rezone from G to P-1 to allow development of office complex and preliminary plat approval for 12-lot commercial plat ; property located south of Valley General Hospital , southwest of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S.W. 43rd Street The rezone and plat have not been considered with the PUD. ) PRELIMINARY DRAFT ERADCO PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF FINAL ERADCO FEIS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Review of preliminary draft of ERADCO FEIS regarding ERADCO Planned Unit Development proposal; property located north of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) , south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery, and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way NEW BUSINESS: ECF-044-81 J. ANTHONY IVE B-251 Application for building permit to allow construction of orthodontic clinic for Dr. Brain and Dr. Dunnington; property located at 3817 Talbot Road South Environmental REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Review Procedures Proposed response to Mayor concerning Hearing Examiner 's suggestions regarding use of environmental checklist review sheets while reviewing environmental documents i Si I I A) ' I . 45 p I A I iv . f_______i LAI , I" 1 rim. \e. s\OR L __‘ I----4, t No. ,.bh.-„L....,....._,.. _____, NEI , t _ 16--ItYi 7 \\ LAKE tri 1 ,..• WASHINGTON ff 44%%Arill1iitlmisi, r' i ratioplilpirWINno :IR inn i; - w 1i... • lis Estigkliaglit* inU :1114. I V43412111:klik 06,411rdXrdki ti it MI:1-i,- itsAk Nf' MViI. l, IM. su, F,,,,,,it,,i,,. I w illik i" a• t„.,- 4.Ar.- M", 1 1_, 1 MIK j t atn i ERADCO L 1 1.1\t--a, I.. 1v_ stn, l'."•--rs,: i,,m,--i- c1 N, l, i. l., i,..,1.„.j.., e.....g.:4i)1i4i0m.u4p„.m0dm lt,,,- M 6•• i l.... i a.._.. o,... i.-__ l,_;.-.,!, i. i. h 4,,:•-,\-.i../_1f., 11. I0. 7,,- i.-, t ,, r iles m s p a `-+ 1,..i 11iki1jJ1 i. \' '; fir 1 i- r r 11! J$ I 1 7 i-- s 11III'" 4* 7 J. ANTHONY IVE ; Pa r p 1 .., P L"-- ONE VALLEY PLACE L 2- 1--/- 73 1 f l 1 N r w I V I i LAKE M k.-- -- • c.-riz -- /"=-400 ' c_. 1 • I :7..-----",-„ e4 ...._ 4,•-.47,,,,,... z,„. , 1 .1 -.el.,.— 70 -"");--•,,,,,,, r 0.* .,... 1 4 t 4.., Iii - A • t I . 7. I. " g.• .• . i 1. i 1 J r ' f I i••r - . i1r".•.. t• . • . N----_____ .... 7.... 4' 7I a Ii f' I . I• I i 1 I !i •t 1 : i t , Ii II S A I i I t , \ V. ; I1 iI • 1 1II 1. IiS-,/.. I I1 t' 11I 05/1/.antuummommali... Ii /1 1 eItII. . Toexisitogsewer I11i17/7eo72g9//evOef7 ,/1 11 A ; ill ) finip/7C-7/ Cr'frelf7/01-S- 1 _-_-) /11"--- ! ---r .1 '=' .- iZ: " r t1C0/1*-'1iti_ D ' - !— i . 1ssi i AFFIDAVIT I, /77:a c 2 Lam being duly sworn, declare that I am the o ner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Public) S i ature of Owner) 5e,/ 44121---- t---- Address) Address) 4t:: - T City) State) 5sJ5co Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept. 2-73 CITY OF RENTON Fy\tip •' ti. .011E APPLICATION FOR OFFICE LSE ONLY R. 1 LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. 117 0141" EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO.CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE .1/..11/f/ ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE YEARING DATE APPLICANT Tr COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 :Z, LowA5„p gbcs {, D•eoN SE- l I iL . Na"e lam- Vd L C. Pze, rp) JZ Tl es Phone ei-5'—4o 0)0 Address Z/ I 11HE 5• =• ff r--- 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 4?vc . 4 14 iD7 between_ and 4 . Square footage or acreage of property lc 0-CS • 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Ce-t 6/ 417Z-/CIA-0 C.51 4/2u64/. f f 6 . Existinc Zoning Zoning Requested i NOTE TO APPIICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements. ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposec use of site r) Fri 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. j3,1 V i lzo N Yn en T" - (2 cv.0 S r 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? x MrJ•I PE-S ,4-F E. -ot e -r'r: -sT 1' of- tip ST fzbcr p c* P)N1 0 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required . Planning Dept. 1-77 S 0 AFFIDAVIT I , b4-4 ep •A A S)Pe A M,ge being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property invo ved 'in this application and th atPypptht the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this 27 day of 19 g/ , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at A2,-'''Z...,...IC--"r.,'L--e---e.A.-le, Name c f Notary Public) nature N er) f Ale.---6e...c.-cr-g-tx./ 1 4„,/)g Lcot.t...W240 CAddre_ s) Addr s Z&Oi teveic,(. 4_ si-ei fi( ty) tate) 8 4s5 - 9O Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : N//lG DEpP' Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 711111/111 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM F FGR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. -- LO -- d32 4/ Environmental Checklist No. C D PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EI5 be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even tnough completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent ONF VAIIFY PLACE PROPERTIFS 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 2691 168th Aven. S. F. Bellevue, WA 98009 Phone 455-4990 3. Date Checklist submitted 2/27/81 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: ONE VALLEY PLACF 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The proposal includes medical and general office buildings, a ni,rcing nr retirement home, bank and restaurant. Approsimately 140,000 s.f. of office spac( 2 stories to 8 stories. Greenbelt areas will be preserved and public roads fully landscaped. On-grade parking for all structures. Building designs and on-site 1anrlccapinn regulated _bv an_ !architectural Re eCommits __ _..tf_._c__d y Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions filed by Deeds to the filed plat. 1116 4102- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-mental setting of the prop sal ) : The proposal is situated on ± 11 .7 acres located at S. 43rd & S.R.167. The land is relatively flat with greenbelt on its southwest corner. At present he balance of the property. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 1987 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone and Major plat approvals required by City of Renton 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activityrelatedtoorconnectedwiththisproposal? If yes , axplain: NQ 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered byyourproposal ? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futuredate, describe the nature of such application form: Narrative description of proposal !rich outlines mitigation of environmental impacts. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic , substructures?XX YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or _oVer covering of the soil? XX YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? XX YES }MAYBE ` d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? XX YES MAYBE N — e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? XX YES MAYBE NO f) changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Buildings and parking areas will require removal of topsoil and replacement with structural fill . 4 3- El 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES RATITE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBEX c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES RATITE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?x_ YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MMYB'• f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Xgroundwaters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YET- TOTE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YET- MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposal will decrease absorption rates and therefore increase surface water run-off. Detention systems will maintain the existing rate of run-off to the downstream drainage system. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction cf the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YET- MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 116 q_ 41110 5 ) Fauna. will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?Yam- MAYBE N Explanation: Building lights and car lights will increase the light now emanating from the sit( 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YYS— MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: k) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X V ES— MAYBE NU— Explanation: This will be a new location for working people M 5410 12 ) housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?X _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation : Working people do tend to live closer to a new lob location and the area will need additional housing. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne , rail or air traffic? X YES FUTE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Additional traffic will be generated on and around this site. Adequate parking has been provided and improvements to the road system will be made to mitigate the traffic impact. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? rS MAYBE N Explanation: _ 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm w, ter drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: An 8" city sewer has been approved for an extension to this site. A storm drainage and retention system 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding Xmentalhealth)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? AlESMAYBEN Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? YES MATTE"- NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. r ^:mil_Proponent: •/ f'-,. Z—! signed) d'f 7)-ull2 7.(//7; ame princes n City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ENDINGS OF FILE Fig TITLE