Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-058
• BEGINNING °F FOCFOFILMEO • FILE TITLE 111AAnit20) P � 53dso OF R��r ,s AA THE CITY OF RENTON U 440 1,, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o • BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR a LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gT�D SEP�cA4P • • • . j® R4 • September 8 , 1981 !�� c�(_(` 1,!L. (0 • � C.? SEP 8 1991 Mr. Jack B. Curran 1 . --............ -e Henry Bacon Building Materials, Inc. P.O. Box 6669 • Bellevue, Washington 98007 RE: File Number SP-058-81 Dear Mr. Curran: I have reviewed your letter concerning the above entitled matter and my response follows : The term "perimeter" was meant to denote those portions of the subject site abutting and adjacent to public rights-of-way. If this office can be of further assistance in these matters , you may call. • Sincerely, Fred J. Maufman Hearing Examiner ./ cc: Planning Department V • • FJK:cl " .� ENRY n H j rtia building materials inc. s e- WIIIACON ' "Ss. s� yh ''�a .S+`,�, NIWg x.� `s� .1 .Alfge 's,:v..`s �'S'9 ' 3'.`.° .f.�Yr# �..'0 Y ;. o general offices & bellevue store: 2350 - 140th n.e. 98005 •(206) 641-8000 tyvagoo, seattle store : 411 elliott avenue w. 98119 •(206) 284-7844 direct all correspondence to: p.o. box 6669 • bellevue 98007 EC'ENED • 1 �� l'.j;. &ETY OF RENTON HEAnINd EXAMINER September 2, 1981 e� 0\I�a� C`4. SEP 3 1981 • ir 1381 I'71849116111112111213141516 o Mr. Fred Kaufman �P ,W Hearing Examiner \ 200 Mill Avenue South ' <`4 Renton, WA 98055 ' �!1`r, Dear Sir: On August 25th, I received your decision on file number SP058-81 . I appreciate the consideration that has gone into this from your department. This is our 3rd project of building a new lumber yard, building material, home center facility and in this case, I decided to get involved in all the preparation up to the point of having the architect draw up the final drawings for construction purposes that involved the short plat of the property and the special permits required for my type of use, it has been quite an experience. I started June 1st and stayed with it continuously, until now it looks like we are ready to go ahead with the final plans and construction. In going in today to the planning department to clarify a couple of items, it was pointed out to me, by Roger Blaelock, that I should ask you to clarify under decision, the item number 2 , on the back page, the word perimeter. It is our plan to landscape along the street right away that borders the property on the west, as per approval , and to landscape in the parking lot area as the plans show. This covers the Westerly side of the building site and the Southerly side. On the Easterly side, the existing building is built on the property line and it runs alomst the length of the Easterly side. On the Northerly side, we but up against the railroad right away and the tracks sit 20 to 30 feet above the property. This boundry line will be fenced, of course, for security and is not in the view of the public. This will be one of the main areas that we will be stacking our lumber. If this is your thinking also on the landscaping requirements, this is the same as we had planned. . Mr. Fred Kaufman Page 2 September 2 , 1981 Please clarify your thoughts on the word perimeter. It could mean the complete encirclement of the property, which is not possible. Regards, . HENRY BACON BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. Ja k B. Curran President JBC:km OF RA,A ., w O THE CITY OF RENTON U �� �3v MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 NAL 0ammo }` BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gT�D SEP� ,40 September 14, 1981 • Mr. Jack B. Curran Henry Bacon Building Materials, Inc. P.O. Box 6669 Bellevue, WA 98007 RE:1 Fi le_t�bl:_ S:P;05,8-8,1 -Ja.ck.. Gu;rran S.Pecial Permi t: il Dear Mr. Curran: This is to notify you that the Examiner's decision regarding the referenced matter has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the Planning Department this date for permanent filing. If you require further information or assistance, please call this office. Sincerely, ,‘:1C0•44 Fred J. Kau man Hearing Examiner/ cc: ✓Planning Department 1 emu/ (3 ss? ��1 111 n]C /J r `� THE CITY OF RENTON - j � '� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ..o �' BARBARA. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 94T6b SEP1E°�� September 14, 1981 Mr. Jack B. Curran Henry Bacon Building Materials, Inc. P.O. Box 6669 Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: File No. SP-058-81 ; Jack Curran Special Permit. Dear Mr. Curran: This is to notify you that the Examiner's decision regarding the referenced matter has not keen appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the Planning Department this date for permanent filing. If you require further information or assistance, please call this office. Sincerely, A-10`'''St Fred J. Kau man Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department OF R4, t THE CITY OF RENTON qt : "'tom MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n PAL o N BARBARA. Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O9�TF0 SEP�E���P • September 8, 1981 Mr. Jack B. Curran Henry Bacon Building Materials, Inc. P.O. Box 6669 Bellevue, Washington 98007 RE: File Number SP-058-81 Dear Mr. Curran : I have reviewed your letter concerning the above entitled matter and my response follows : The term "perimeter" was meant to denote those portions of the subject site abutting and adjacent to public rights-of-way. If this office can be of further assistance in these matters , you may call. • Sincerely, Fred J. aufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department FJK:cl 4limmmi'' EN RY Y bu ilding in9 mater ials s inc. . i , ACON K. :::...::....:..:: general offices & bellevue store: 2350 - 140th n.e. 98005 •(206) 641-80 seattle store : 411 elliott avenue w. 98119 •(206) 284-78 direct all correspondence to: p.o. box 6669 • bellevue 980 rm e'"E,N tO OITY OF RENTON HEARINd g.(AMINER September 2 , 1981 SEP 31981 AM PM 71849i10111112111213141516 Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir: On August 25th, I received your decision on file number SP058-81. I appreciate the consideration that has gone into this from your department. This is our 3rd project of building a new lumber yard, building material, home center facility and in this case, I decided to get involved in all the preparation up to the point of having the architect draw up the final drawings for construction purposes that involved the short plat of the property and the special permits required for my type of use, it has been quite an experience. I started June 1st and stayed with it continuously, until now it looks like we are ready to go ahead with the final plans and construction. In going in today to the planning department to clarify a couple of items, it was pointed out to me, by Roger Blaelock, that I should ask you to clarify under decision, the item number-2, on the back page, the word perimeter. It is our plan to landscape along the street right away that borders the property on the west, as per approval, and to landscape in the parking lot area as the plans show. This covers the Westerly side of the building site and the Southerly side. On the Easterly side, the existing building is built on the property line and it runs alomst the length of the Easterly side. On the Northerly side, we but up against the railroad right away and the tracks sit. 20 to 30 feet above the property. This boundry line will be fenced, of course, for security and is not in the view of the public. This will be one of the main areas that we will be stacking our lumber. If this is your thinking also on the landscaping requirements, this is the same as we had planned. -,% Mr. Fred Kaufman Page 2 September 2 , 1981 Please clarify your thoughts on the word perimeter. It could mean the complete encirclement of the property, which is not possible. Regards, HENRY BACON BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. 41-cek- n J k B. Curran C K- President JBC:km AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of August , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. a23V- et Subscribed and sworn this day of kvvsk— , 19 $1 kaad Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at R.evttotti Application, Petition or Case: Jack Curran: SP-058-81 (The minutes corztacin a .gust of the paltia 06 necond. ) August 25, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Jack Curran FILE NO. SP-058-81 LOCATION: Vicinity of 50 S.W. 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a special permit for an addition to an existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on August 6, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the •subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 11 , 1981 at 9:45 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Map with staff comments Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, corrected Sections M.3, M.4, and M.5, which reference Sections L.4, L.5, and L.6, respectively, to reference Sections L.5, L.6, and L.7, respectively. He also advised that although the outside storage yard is greater in size than one acre, it constitutes less than 40% of the total square footage; therefore, provisions of the bulk storage ordinance would not apply. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Jack Curran P.O. Box 6669 Bellevue, WA 98007 Referencing Police Department recommendations' contained in Section L.7 of the Planning Department report regarding installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. , Mr. Curran advised the Examiner that upon dedication of Hardie Avenue several months ago, included in the written agreement signed by the Mayor and the Engineering Division was a provision which stated that the applicant would not be required to participate in the cost of the signal since construction on the subject site would not have any bearing on the installation. Mr. Curran requested clarification of an Engineering Division staff comment which recommends dedication of additional right-of-way along S.W. 7th Street for future installation of sidewalks, noting that the northern lot is proposed for development at this time, not the southerly lot abutting S.W. 7th Street. The Examiner agreed that conditions may be imposed on the southerly lot upon development at a later date, but should not be required at this time. Mr. Curran discussed requirements for a screening fence and indicated his intent to provide an eight foot high slatted, diffused fence with provision of landscaping on the exterior; however, he questioned the recommendation to provide landscaping on the inside of the fence, particularly since it would be adjacent to an operational area. He also noted the provision of sidewalks and a retaining wall in addition to the landscaping and fencing. Mr. Blaylock discussed the Planning Department's concern that the lumber could be stacked to a height of SP- -81 Page Two 20 feet, 12 feet above the top of the fence, and to ensure. a screening effect, additional landscaping located inside the fence had been recommended. Mr. Curran clarified the maximum height of stacked lumber in the yard, three slings high, noting that that is the maximum height which fork lift equipment can accommodate. He also clarified that required turning radius will be provided on site to expedite traffic flow and avoid congestion. The Examiner confirmed that all vehicle maneuvering must take place on site in accordance with provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Responding for the city was: Gary Norris Traffic Engineer Mr. Norris expressed concern with proposed access widths to accommodate large trucks traveling to the back portion of the property. He stated that a 30-foot width is proposed on the northern access, and the driveway to the south is proposed at 40 feet in width. He suggested that it might be preferable to provide the wider driveway on the northern access and the 30-foot width on the south. He also stated that although the applicant had discussed an agreement with the city which holds him harmless from any cost of providing the signal at S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue, funds have not yet been identified for installation of that facility, and because of the high percentage of accidents at that intersection, it remains a concern of the city. Also, the agreement does not state that development would be allowed prior to the signal installation. The Examiner inquired if it was Mr. Norris' opinion that without the signal , this project should not be constructed. Mr. Norris confirmed the statement. The Examiner then reported that he would hold the hearing record open until a copy of the written agreement is received for purposes of clarification. Mr. Curran stated that he has been coordinating the project with city staff for several months, that the agreement had conditioned the dedication of Hardie Avenue on releasing the applicant from participation in the cost of signalization at the aforementioned intersection, that the street remains open at this time, and the proposed project will only generate a maximum of 300 trips per day. I . Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding turnaround provisions, Mr. Curran stated that the required radius would be provided on site, and the secondary structure to the west will function as a drive-through lumber loading facility consisting of a roof supported by posts to allow customers to load supplies•• in an area out of the rain. The Examiner stated that the record would remain open to allow receipt of the referenced agreement, and the report would be issued within fourteen days following that submission. Since there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. SP-058-81 was closed by the Examiner at 10:05 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to allow the establishment of a lumber yard and hardware store in a B-1 (Business/Commercial) zone. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . I _ 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located in the vicinity of 50 S.W. 7th Street. The site is essentially level and limited amounts of vegetation exist on the cleared site. 7. The applicant proposes constructing a lumber yard and hardware store on the subject site. Pursuant to Section 4-711 (A) (7) , lumber yards may be permitted in a B-1 zone subject to the approval of a special permit and provided further that the yard is screened by an eight (8) foot fence and is locatedmore than 100 feet from a residential district. 8. The site has an existing building of about 20,000 square feet to which the applicant proposes an addition of 14,440 square feet. The proposal will also contain about SP-058-ei Page Three 1 10,320 feet of covered outdoor storage and about 46,400 square feet of uncovered storage. The applicant proposes. providing 78 parking stalls whereas only 72 parking stalls are required. 9. The applicant proposes complying with the requirements to provide a screening fence on the subject site. The Planning Department recommended that landscaping be placed interior to the fence for screening purposes since lumber may be stacked up to twenty feet high. 10. All maneuvering must occur on site and the Traffic Engineer recommended that the northerly proposed driveway be widened and that a specific turnaround be employed for the use of large delivery vehicles. The applicant proposed a 30-foot driveway at the northern access. The Traffic.Engineer indicated that a 40-foot wide driveway would be better in this location. The proposed southern driveway is 40 feet wide. 11 . The current sewer line must be relocated to conform to the revised location of Hardie/ Edwards Avenue. Storm drainage plans must be provided and approved by the Public Works Department. 12. The Fire Department required consultation about stacking height, access for emergency vehicles and information about the type of storage and the configuration of the yard. 13. The Police Department indicated that an intrusion alarm is required because the screening fence blocks the view into the interior of the storage area. 14. Both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer indicate that the project should ' not be permitted until a traffic signal is installed at the intersection of Hardie/ Edwards Avenue and S.W. 7th Street. No traffic analysis was submitted to substantiate the need for the signal . Hardie/Edwards Avenue was dedicated as a public right-of-way by the applicant at some economic cost though the department indicated that a traffic signal must be installed at the above location, but did not recommend a method for financing same. The developer of the Ea,rlington Woods PUD has agreed to partial participation in the cost of the signal . 15. The site, with the exception of the existing structure, is undeveloped. The Burlington Northern right-of-way is located just north of the site. The Sears Shopping Center is located north of the railroad. A variety of commercial and light industrial uses are situated south and west of the subject site. 16. The predominant zoning category in the area is B-1 , the subject site's classification. Some light industrial zoning (L-1) is located east of the site and manufacturing park (MP) zoning is located west of the site. 17. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for commercial uses. CONCLUSIONS: + 1 . The special permit to allow the establishment of a combination lumber yard/hardware store in the B-1 zone adjacent to the Sears Shopping Center appears to serve the public use and interest although certain modification of the plans is required so that the impact of the proposal will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. 2. The access to the site is via Hardie/Edwards Avenue, and while the extreme curves in the road have been removed, the site is still located on a curving portion of the roadway and just south of the railroad overpass. Visibility in this location is not the best, and therefore wider driveways which can expedite turning movements are in order. A 40-foot driveway should be installed at all access points for the subject property. 3. The lack of a traffic signal at the intersection of the site's access roadway (Hardie/ Edwards Avenue) and S.W. 7th Street presents an issue of overriding public safety with similar concerns raised by both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer. • While part of the costs of the signal will be borne by the developer of Earlington Woods, the remainder of the costs is unassigned. The applicant has dedicated the right-of-way at considerable economic cost. The proposed business is not the sole generator of traffic in the area, and therefore the signal costs should not be placed upon the applicant. While the departments with expertise indicated that the signal light should be operating prior to the operation of the proposed use, the applicant should not bear the cost of installing same. SP-058-81 Page Four 4. The issue is one .of .the safety of those using the roadway with increased frequency as the rear access to the Sears Shopping Center from the developing commercial and industrial areas west and south of the intersection, but as indicated above, the subject proposal will not place an undue burden on the existing intersection by its mere operation, and the operation of the business should not be held up until such signal is in place. 5. The fence should be set back from the property line and landscaping should be installed between the fence and property line to soften the effects of the fence on city right-of-way (Comprehensive Plan, Policy 3.C. 1 . and 4) . 6. The lumber yard will not unduly harm neighboring properties, and as conditioned will not prove detrimental to the public welfare. Neighboring properties are a mix of commercial and industrial uses and will not be impaired by the establishment of the lumber yard in this location. DECISION: The special permit is approved subject to the, following: I . All access driveways be not less than 40 feet wide. 2. The perimeter of the site should be landscaped and such landscaping approved by the appropriate city agency. ORDERED THIS 25th day of August, 1981 . Fred J. Ka an Land Use He ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of August, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Jack Curran, P.O. Box 6669, Bellevue, WA 98007 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of August, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before September 8, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • I , AUG �O �,` Affidavit of Publication R � � o 41s Z -v 81 STATE OF WASHINGTON r �•...,_.� COUNTY OF KING ss. 9 s<cryi bDEP A> Michele..Roe being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that.Sx7 P.is the ...C i ef....Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the NOTICE OF aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record ENVIRONMENTAL Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior DETERMINATION Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Washington.That the annexed is a Notice R6659 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Re- view Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the fol- lowing projects: as it was published in regular issues(and 1• CURRAN, JACK (ECF- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 064-81) Application for special permit approval for addition to existing building to be of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store,file SP-058- �7 day of July ,19 81 ,and ending the 81; property located at the northeast corner of S.W.7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. day of ,19 both dates 2.CITY OF RENTON PLAN- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- N I N G DEPARTMENT scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee (ECF-068-81) Application for environ- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..2.3..31,vhich mental review of proposed has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the revisions to following sec- first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent tions of the City of Renton insertion. Zoning Ordinance: 7/1 Section 4-704 SR-1 Sub- urban Residence No. 1 Section 4-705 SR-2 Sub- urban Residence No, 2 Chief Clerk Section 4-706 R-1 Resi- dence Single Family Section 4-707 S-1 Sub- 0 urban Residence District Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 day of Sectin 4-708 R-2 Resi- dence District •_.•J F•• YYi •.9.81 Section 4-729 "G" Gen- e Classification District Further information re- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, garding these actions is av- residing at I4lIR,-King County. ailable in the Planning De- Auburn partment, Municipal Build- ' - ing, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of — Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June ERC action must be filed 9th, 1955. with the Hearing Examiner —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, by Augustt the 81 Daily shed in Daily Re- adopted by the newspapers of the State. • ,,,,,,••_ • ---___ cord Chronicle July 27, 1981. R6659 V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 111 ENRY "Ili\ vw i : •: ACON be�ld�nJmaterials �nc r _� .a . __ general offices & bellevue store: 2350 - 140th n.e. 98005 •(206) 641-8000 seattle store : 411 elliott avenue w. 98119 •(206) 284-7844 direct all correspondence to: p.o. box 6669 • bellevue 98007 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON August 12, 1981 HEARING EXAMINER RV]. `v 1981 AM PM Fred. Kaufnan 7181911001112111213141516 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 it Dear Sir, After attending the hearing on August 8, 1981 covering special permit #SP058-81, I. thaught it best to express the following details in writing. td you... I tried to speak personally on the matter at the hearing but felt that part of what I tried to say may or may not have been fully understood or absorbed by the hearing ccomittee. This letter should clarify my thoughts. 1. The building department, according to the papers I received, has approved the special permit signed by Mr. Hansen. 2. The engineering division has approved subject to 3 conditions. I can't read the signature, these 3 conditions are all being met. The work is under way according to the city approved plans. 3. The traffic division has been approved by Gary Norris subject to the following conditions. A. The road way alienment was designed by the city engineering, it was found to be substandard for safety, this has been realiened and is being constructed under approved city plan. B. Regarding the maneuvering of trucks on public right away. We have no intention of building our facility so that this would be required. All truck maneuvering will be on our own property. C. Verbally at the meeting, if I understood him right,-Mr. Norris of the traffic division, suggested that the permit for construction be held up'regarding development of the proposed property until funds were found to pay for installation of a proposed stop light at the 7th and Edwards St. Before'.this property was purchased for development and before the Edwards St. property was given to the city, I entered into an agreement with the city, Mr. Edwards, CHG. Co. and myself that the light would be installed at the cost of others than myself and it would not create a delay in our Fred Kaufnan Page 2 August 12, 1981 construction plans. This was a combination of a verbal and a written agreement during April, May and June. This should satisfy this proposed problem. 4. The engineering department approved subject to 4 conditions. A. We will correct if we build over the sewer line. B. City is asking for a 5 foot easment, I just found out today what they are referring to. They have run part of this new sewer on my property rather than city property, this is the main sewer line, that I understood would be out in the street as normal. I would plan on getting together with the city and taking care of this. The city will have to provide the paper work and filing necessary to achieve this. C. The 5 foot right of way that the city wants of my property on 7th doesn't effect this project. I would plan on handling the same as above if we can get this all worked out. D. On-sight storm water retention system will be revised to meet city requirements when plans go through for building the apartments. 5. The fire department has approved with the conditions. I have met with the fire people and understand these requirements will be met. 6. Utility department. A. This has been covered previously it will be taken care of. 7. Police department. A. We use the Alarmex system for burglary in all our facilities. This should cover all there concerns. 8. Police department. A. The 10 foot drive way that the police department object to, is actually 40 foot. Placement of these 2 driveways, one 40 foot and one 30 foot are not completely decided upon. The 10 foot was a mis print on the plan. B. The traffic signal was covered previously in this letter. Probably the key thing that has not been fully decided upon at this time is the request that along the Westerly side of the storage area we put a planting 5 foot wide inside the fence area. I talked today with Roger Blaelock at the planning department regarding this request by them. The Fred Kaufnan Page 3 August 12, 1981 new road that we are putting in will have a 7 foot wide strip infront of the fence and a 5 foot wide side walk running along side the fence. This area will have to be planted and will make the whole area very attractive. Next to the sidewalk there will be a wall roughly 4 to 5 feet high on top of that wall an 8 foot screen fence. This should give all the screening that any one should feel necessary and it would moot the code requirements. Inside the yard area we will provide protection bumpers for the fende in order to help keep a continual good looking fence screen exposure. Another planting inside this fence would create an unrealistic expense and would create a hardship in working in the area. I would request that this condition be dropped. For what I can find on the paperwork I have this last condition planting area was a verbal suggestion entered into the meeting and was not a written request by the planning department. After explaining my feelings to Mr. Blaelock I believe he felt it was probably not a necessary condition. Thank you for your considerations in this matter. Regards, HENRY BACON BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. Cl- 0)(-0\- -CtIV Jack urran v.zi Rm. President 7c/Pim C/C Dick Carson OF I %0 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 2. nil o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9,0 �• 0gTE.D SEP1'- August 12, 1581 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director SUBJECT: Jack Curran Short Plat As a result of the hearing on Tuesday and the reference to the traffic signal at SW 7th and Hardie, may I submit the following: 1 . We do not have what he referred to as an agreement. All we have is a memo of understanding between Mr. Edwards, owner of the Renton Shopping Center; Mr. Curran, purchaser of the property lying east of Hardie SW and south of the railroad tracks north of S. 7th; C.H.G. , the developer; and myself. Basically what it says is that if Mr. Curran and Mr. Edwards would donate the right-of-way for Hardie Ave. SW from SW 7th to the railroad tracks once and for all (after twenty years of some very unfriendly negotiations) solve the problem of the right-of-way, we would not require any additional participation from them on the signal at SW 7th and Hardie. Their participation would be the donation of the right-of-way, some very expensive property I might add. 2. We have initiated a program to find the finances for the signal at 7th and Hardie in-house. It appears that we may be able to do this; how- ever, as you know we have no absolute funding other than a commitment of 25% from CHG. There are others who have been requested to participate but they are not signed, sealed and delivered. 3. I do not believe that there is enough additional traffic that would be generated from Mr. Curran' s operation that would make a severe impact on the intersection at this time; therefore I do not believe we should stop him from continuing with his project. The most severe problem is going to come from the completion of CHG' s project. I hope this will help you make a decision. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON j HEARING EXAMINER �ffi�J AUG1 3 1981 RCH:pmp AM PM 71819110111112111213141516 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 11 , 1981 APPLICANT: CURRAN, JACK FILE NUMBER: SP-058-81 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF '4 *UEST: The applicant requests approval of a Special Permit for an addition to an existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store. B. GENERAL I!FO.'0 1,m'T'ION: 1 . Owner of Record: JACK B. CURRAN 2. Applicant: JACK B. CURRAN 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Vicinity of 50 S.W. 7th Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: +3. 19 acres 6. Access : Via Edwards Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1 ; L-1 , Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on July 21 , 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on July 27, 1981 . C. ISTTORY/ KG D : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14, 1959, and zoned B-1 by Ordinance 1884 of May 2, 1961 . The Hearing Examiner approved a 3-lot short plat for the subject site on July 16, 1981 . D. PHYSICAL B GROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is essentially level. 2. Soils: Urban land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers and additions PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEAING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: JACK CURRAN, SP-058-81 AUGUST 11 , 1981 PAGE THREE 5. Traffic: The proposed +14 ,440 sq. ft. addition will add approximately 740 vehicle trips/day to the area ' s streets. This represents a 10% increase over present levels (7. 029 trips/day) . J. ENVIArmill PloTALASSE»SSfluol''T/TffiESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the Environmental Review Committee issued a declaration of non-significance for the subject proposal on July 27, 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Department 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The applicant proposes to construct a 14 ,440 square foot addition to an existing building (20, 000 square feet) to be used for retail and wholesale sales of lumber and hardware products. Also to be constructed is an outdoor storage portion (covered) of 10, 320 square feet to supplement existing outdoor storage of 46, 388 square feet. These storage areas are to be screened by a fence and landscaping. 2. Parking required and parking provided for the subject proposal can be summarized as follows : REQUIRED PROVIDED Existing Warehouse (20,000 sq.ft.) 13 stalls New Building-Sales (14,440 sq.ft.) 29 stalls New Covered Storage (10,320 sq.ft.) 7 stalls - Outside Storage (46,388 sq.ft.) 23 stalls - 72 stalls 78 stalls As the table indicates, the existing facility and proposed improvements meet the standards of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Chapter 22) . This is true only if the proposed building is utilized as a hardware store and not reserved to strict retail or expanded. Either of these would require additional parking and a revised site plan. 3. The conceptual landscape scheme would appear to satisfy the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. A detailed plan must be submitted to the Building Department for approval by the City' s landscape architect, however. In addition, Section 4-711A(7) of the Zoning Code requires an 8 foot solid wall or site-obscuring fence screening unhoused storage areas from public view. The site plan as submitted indicates only a 6 foot wall and fence. ------t_ ,��y!. ►�•''� ,as .... .-- , : _--� . -:-,, ,.....71. ,; :.4.-., ... ::. , p Ids .,,,....4-:- , .„ , -T_H'.1 ) .it ' 0 \ ' � •• am-- I nr. . : F; • • • .., , ,..,_ ..________.,r, .. ,., .4 • • • • `-' - - -' .1 ____ . • 4S rI•1ti Imo ( 5rADiNMJ 1 , \ -T-15 -4-7-^-"•‘-••---- - -_, ,v10...../MMi ' I F-1-. T1 4 -7-1 c.4c 1z) .' ' P- , ,.. 1,,.. ., / ... E.,...;414-...:....,,..4 .1. ..„.„,iirIP ..,0,,_-___, ( • • 0 moo• 1 . q 1'i,-, �� .\� _I •s-',', ja.▪ .. 4. 4% • i . '� }i p /-� !l -ram c p t .\, 4 _��r,tom} to ►s. v. `� • • , ... ._, . ,...L. . -„, . ._,___ .. . ..,. ._______„,..„____. ,....,\ , ..„.. .‘ ,• ,.... ,_,_.„ _ .,,,,_,,, , ... 44,tt.' a Ei a N.. • ,.. • • . , . , T, \ �. -. ►'hai1.t• �T 4.:c w_I �',t .t• I. r �,vj r .'f I i • 12 I 4o t I I. *1\ ` ��/ - r� t te 1 P'��-,- ^-• }1 - •�'�'\ }�'G` � �*T-'"- v� .;\ �wi- '`.ITT! �•r,�W�.y,I•r,.I, - r �-�r _T T r 1 25 got• , . . _�cl QE cT t (•- A F 1 > ' -- -..'+ '►ice lA 1 - . . 13-1 0.1 j / i i/ ,//).� • r .. ' 1m' R-2!Vlit ''''', - $41-. .-----; P .7111' Ma ' : . ' -. E-;., -'if , ..... '--:•'V r ,:;--• .t --•-•----.5 /7 r-r ,...,,_ ,„, .:li„ ,, . , , . , )4 , .; I 4-,.440. -*, -1. 7. ;,..___...._., , : ,t.i*„,. .14. 7.7_„_ ..1. :„.27.,,, 0.,;,, . ,., 1 �p �.*,d ''^:+• 7M� $ 17*• r n-`- ' 'A; `� ~ 9-- - vi i T r 9 I •�I� '. A' •o• To.T,t • • JO \\ *ti +•ate •,.` frR'3'- L / ' : n J ul�` $ w P' SU, v`1 + "q4 A ' i I \ \4l. p • N•v G ••jr... aP--—I14'.:. i-> o. 'V3f T B�✓D .' \ OQP7 0 _•,---- 4 ..*,4. -"94'1.-./-,._9 ., -_'a. R .., . _ ,,, 2 N 4 - -... ;y /.,- `?' �• S-I air' Ei s l•__,=1tt'A ,. u c G s•0 •,/ s l _,. '\ L:-1 't -. - -i ..ii,;.;:4 „,., , „...,,,, " . - ___,----t___. \, .).., ___ , . ,„ , . ,, . ...., ........i , .„... .• , , i . ,- , . t, - _ if--1 LJ j r, " '' 1. -4i — i ----- { ter--- S. W -- 7TH — _ --- --- ..0 .- Q. c CURRAN, JACK - SP-058-81 SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT JACK CURRAN TOTAL AREA +3. 19 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Edwards Avenue S.W. EXISTING ZONING B-1 , Business Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped An addition to an existing building to be used PROPOSED USE as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS R sion 3/1981 1• 7• �� • RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: ii , . L ., II _ : , .t• r- . 1 ■ . 4 ! . ititrAtike • Location: Reis iter d7eSGv7 ^'S v.t 7 rdi.r du '. se Applicant: CurwtN ?Qtk I( : Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: -08/2/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks partment uilding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON -7f719/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L._.0 C. Q Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 7 'c .� . DATE: 7- -YI Signatur o irector or Auth rized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: El Approved Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved • DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • evision 3/1981 I/AM RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: SPEC ! ! aitos8-11) egjai TO sr it_egibtosit bizLTJi /• 4. e$ds Sia re Valli• svleirtwi �IM�irot4;A*rJww.4 � Location: eiirpt� �r� SG , 7 Si r 'got aw. dam, s Applicant: Cvrr,iN' 741-c k LQ; ❑Public Works Department ❑En ' ering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: lafin raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 7/.8/2/ ❑Utilities Eng. Division ❑Fire Department ❑Parks Department ❑ Building Department ❑ Police Department ['Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON 7f7/ 9I . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: //yya f-iee 64y/y , v-- . 17 ['Approved 0 Approved with Conditions lot Approved `o I- c_ '`�.s1/L�J� , ��/ ` / GAG---7 '4 '74-e- 7 Y el-- ` :7 _''--) 0114<ATE: , e Signature of Director or Authorized Representa REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ['Approved ['Approved with Conditions [Dot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1 n 7/so/g/ .evision 3/1981 t'� isl 'IP RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: 3jc/ftt / 1Th1tT ISA- os8-8) Location: so 514 7 t 5- Applicant: CurraN rac . %01' �`' �. 4i1 la: ❑Public W)‘-ks Department t7) Lam`< t, ering Division AUG 3 1981 SC EDUCED ERC DATE: r-1 -affic Eng. Division .4 _/ -- l SCHFPYIJED HEARING DATE: 9/,,fgi ]Utilities Eng. Division ' -14 \ DPP OFire Department -Y Darks Department RE Pa ` ' ❑Building Department 811 Police Department ❑Others: 9/3/1/ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITNG. - PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 6 19/ • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ❑Approved DrApproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved p- / , D u J€- _ dam- lv ' ' ,. ' so w ' 44. 3 "4 4 'J 7 aSI` c < — DATE: 7l3 �-/� Signature of Director or Author zed epresenta ive REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ❑Approved ❑Approved with Conditions EDNot Approved !I) 0 &- r=i- --: Se--- s•-1-- `-'57--- g7'j ------ ‘-*-11--e-e DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative .. . . Corowte4/4 ; / / trait �/3AS' 1 1 ' nr &cap) 7 ,7 Ofi /21 • 6 - On Sr fe- cir-c. Apit-erei A Z �e pdvl�C �r- rU,c-erifQ ere. �/41,0 ri or- X V e tt> Cons puc/iv 4 , (� �1r-e lanes t'e u,rPf Qat- ce es5 Z /. �o \ rdaA d /cvc/ Af // ,, eV Aut/ in C)- Ale au e 7;rl h I-4 rallbc Jr' c r Nit e ale /, e f t Merl- I-1 if i1` 67 n act e ss FOQof'�t>a! 5 urn aroq re a,�� yI:FA 4,,,cf-ess oc' /661 / dOtAiS i1e S B rcz C !O Ze, �e c, - JOS /U /O G4/'a s� , m e/41 4 .4,rrea j; 1 PN rel.,'are/ /m e r 54ra e. • ( d r c-lt.A--C ar1114(4l Pe V;e14) 6 /Ve e/ LrG�/C� i9,4 a / ;n�o r/yta ?L or Pe ul i'ee cr c 1)4-c 1. di I SEP :vision 3/1981 7/3c/g/' . ik. tiltg4 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW ISHEET Application: 5/(f't fITh1 t /SP"• d +$) Location: So SW 7 SIC Applicant: CVrrav teL 111: ElPublic Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: °Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: eititigi ❑Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Rb TOAAI 0BuildjAg Department R� olice Department V Others: 9/3/1/ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITNG. ' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON • • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE DEPT. 0 Approved 7/ Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved 1) The driveway on the South is labeled as 10 ' , this should be a 40 foot driveway due to the design of the parking lot. 2) This development should not be allowed until there is a traffic signal at the i' 'tersection of S.W. 7th & Hardie S.W. (r-- " ' //-if...f_.--_- --____---Lt. D.R. Persson DATE: 8/4/81 " Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: []Approved []Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Y FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-058-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-064-81 Description of Proposal: Request for Special Permit approval for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and whole- sale lumber yard and hardware store. Proponent : Curran, Jack Location of Proposal: Northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 22, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David Clemens James Matthew Richard Houghton Steve Munson Roger Blaylock Gary Norris James Hanson Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-064-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: July 15, 1981 2) Applications : SP-058-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Engineering Department, Building Department and Police. Recommendations for a declaration of significance; Traffice Engineering Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. This Declaration of Non-Significance is provisioned on compliance with the following requirements : Subject to revision of plans to comply with City standards for the street configuration on Edwards Avenue S.W. C-;000&-te4-77s 5A0 c / 8,041 0/g.- ' ",1 a• W e tAi f r I /1 6 - On 51. 1e- cirf_. yclerei Gr- C' Ur,`ecf e r c. Vobt.) (ri or Mu} Cork twit)h , /aneS /�e u/ref Qo,- CC e5s Z /SD o rdaAat i€ / a f a ( f rt i5 0 /�ur/ i/? - MIua � /l�-r �r l-a g'' o r i�e r�e !, ef nt 1 hleri� gl rt O_Ce G 1-S5 0,40 lei u /J y 5 / rn arot-t re u�i'c� ! Mi. bud/ r h e4c c e5s o c' /60 Outside 7tq e i Aci-44 as /D hca/1 .7 Me§01 Qftiv erretsitmeo re of /�,rber S/DraQc d r- Yz.4 C de aritneti/ l✓ r e e, al/`I i� i e, / /h co i-met `'a t� �a r hC ktii•ef Crc Wok), Date circulated : 7 f g j Comments due : ?f?l8f ENVI ONNENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - OLY - RI APPLICATION No(s) . Se- oss •P/ PROPONENT : C.gir Zack PROJECT TITLE : $4f /4 ei J/r Brief Description of Project : RelvedArSPA#Iirguddleva dida•TGh �QQ * t • al• 7Ue v �r s e� .fir :/4.441 .344 %Wier j di' Il4r�www 1 vim. � � �®, , L0CA ION : aeiikei de A braI+ree.ra; 71.5V / rI.eAP.S�SJ SITE AREA: * 3./gQe,s BUILDING AREA (gross) '`trira yce COL C .lerw� DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : 4Ap, 347e DtAtos,- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : • 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources: 10 ) Risk of upset: G------ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends (ITE ) : / &) 7eoQ'7 traffic impacts :P Pro 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: Recommendation : DNSI DOS v More Information Reviewed by : 4.‘,1-7,21�� � Title : ��--� c .5/-3 , zl �iJ Date : 7/2/0/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 717/21 Comments due : 7/7/8f ENVI OI\HEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - OLY - Si APPLICATION No(s) . Se- Q,s`g .s/ PROPONENT : CVrps,K l ek PROJECT TITLE : soFehoz ,j,4f/7 Brief Description of Project : Retted 4-SPAMPobal geop. t •Ti**h ito eltt f y ri/gam •Ae V et s Q ,e/./�C 'Adleseli' /vlr1 1�1e�t• LO • kitrCATION : ' '• ! , e a• 17 de/trebrator a 9 ) 7&'sV , ArueA,r'.S( SITE AREA: * aicarerers BUILDING AREA (gross) it/. yoe g#leitadthij DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : �`/oj 3ZQ 0 Adeloor- 4$410,11, IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE C INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : �--? _ 9) Natural resources : T >( 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : • 14) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : , 19) Recreation: 20 ) Archeology/history : 1, •COMMENTS: Recommendation : 0 SI DOS More Information Reviewed by : ,/, / ,,,,/, Title : (i4d 1) Date : / --g— . FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 7 �Igl Comments due : 7 f 718I ENVI ONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - QLY - it APPLICATION No(s) . se_ ,sg PROPONENT : CPtr4.n}3ittk PROJECT TITLE : SAL'e/AL Ace Apr Brief Description of Project : Rered4r$Awavuothiedir. t • A ekf f i:A'ty d;/L' It v�cr c a 'A i 4.4.40/rsa/r 4,orier ,.,�t �tr► we►w •w. LOCA ION : /eia.•, ArrebrAvr rI, s4V ..S4j SITE AREA: ../y agteres BUILDING AREA (gross) ±/y yoe cObeitairm DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : /0/ .00 *QtAyr - thioray IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE C INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources: 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : xxx 14) Public services: 1 xxxx 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: see notes on Dev. Application sheet, without those areas being solved the police dept. cannot handle the additional police responsibilities that this business will add. **if above comments are applied to the complex Recommendation : DNSI xxx** DOS More Information Reviewed by : e .D.R. Persson Title : Date : 7/6/81 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 17/491 Comments due : "7/? I ENVONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - OLY - RI APPLICATION No(s) . St y OS r94-P/ PROPONENT : Cyrr j J*ck PROJECT TITLE : speatiot Brief Description of Project : RervedAr..CPAMArguditetp. dada kept extS;,t, L;/diyIt v a s et die/./t o/�rjs�� /�i vh'r •pilotstt+r#w�►r* r� L O C A I ON : ' m.', A?., SW 74e`..S rhea fo.S4) SITE AREA : * 3./9QGrts BUILDING AREA (gross) f/y� yoe 4.4 �lehs DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (0 : *A7 Izo *e '/i.r- P ray le IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : v//' 6) Noise : 1/ 7) Light & glare : ✓ 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources: 10) Risk of upset : ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : t� 16) Utilities: t/ 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: izG 'W/V/ n'e'e I be_ r1.2. v ;s Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : /LldV FORM: ERC-06 ` I Date circulated : '1 7Id1 Comments due : .7f 718f EWVI OI1P1ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - OLY - RI APPLICATION No (s) . St OS g •�� PROPONENT: Curplii.rtj Zack PROJECT TITLE : $4f 4 ,Fi441/r Brief Description of Project : 11eyvei`t4eSPPafti,.o,..bteor. gitjobGA ( vita s a ♦e l4**Ad mb /v w04i- �t• • L O C A T ION: "` ;mot• EI Atrebritoor dee Slit 7.1m.s4 •! the Ave.Skj 0 SITE AREA: * 3./9atros BUILDING AREA (gross) it/. fled ' C Affeei DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ..t" .04 41144414•f - IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : t� 5) Animal life : 6) Noise: 7) Light & glare : • 8) Land Use ; north: gilt east : i'ords.rS I J4rlys south: B. 11 P,j a* ftrii1►+— wes t : friArevi,06. Land use conflicts : View obstruction : v r 9) Natural resources: 10) Risk of upset: 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : (� _ 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 3tOrerSigidt7 traffic impacts: 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities: 17 ) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : �r 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: tt (y.ui ,e s INN w e is to a(o! Pe S: /11 •taaa 1. P J Recommendation: DNSI Ir DOS More Information Reviewed by : Sieve Munson Title : AsSis40.11 ��N,...,... Date : 7/isMi FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 7/70/ Comments due : 7/7/81 EWVONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - SI APPLICATION No (s) . Se" o,y'19 ' P/ PROPONENT : Cu i'.l�Lj Jick PROJECT TITLE : $4f /14t ,Ce4f/7 Brief Description of Project : R red4F-S arsuwbleQip. tda•Ah Ar vsevi al a ,e4; e:cot"wetside 4,ffileropiorp-if° keelsoe►w rw �/�- LOCAION: ' iwe d'�/rroritord ICL7M rdieeAre.S) SITE AREA: ' 3./9gtertet, BUILDING AREA (gross) it ',e ¢(494adi rt DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : -Ioj .00 lb ON jar otiPrail tr!. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE _ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: ✓ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : f 3) Water & water courses: 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : V/ 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources: i/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : � 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: � f 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: ✓ 18 ) Aesthetics : r 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : V COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ✓ DOS More Information Reviewed by : 6/..,:),067XJ 70 Title : 1j(JS( Date : /7/8/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 7 749/ Comments due : 7/ ENIV ��I W HENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 40 - S/ APPLICATION No (s) . 44f' CO `;' 1- ,# PROPONENT : '°�, ��l�'te11.�1� e� PROJECT TITLE : evre..04 gior is' , Brief Description of Project : RereS14r.SAwrrjAbeerr 11:. "/Q eitf vigil t3 r/ .a 7Ae t�Ia ff a ,se' c.4,A / eof /#,w�e®r r4,• Altar w�w� �ar //� 0 e LOCA1ION : t.„ /. . F , 4 ...., .p . ,,e° -i B ' -- 'I' SITE AREA: ` 'flr7ate're!g BUILDING AREA (gross) liVele f16,6 4/( ®tetttr DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (0) ,Ion 3Zo •®¢i .... tetivriAr IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE C INFO 1 ) Topographic changes:: Y 2 ) Direct/'Indirect air quality : ✓ 3) Water & water courses:., V 4) Plant life : , . 5 ) Animal life : ), 6) Noise: tr 7) Light & glare : l 8) Land Us'e ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources: 10 ) Risk of upset : '✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : , ✓ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends (ITE ) : traffic impacts: 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : '✓ 16) Utilities: I/ 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : ✓ 19) Recreation: V 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: Recommendation : ANSI DOS More Information 72)1 Reviewed by : 4 -II Title : LEAD ogNa/,cJ Xlejiv6- C s'G. Date : 7- 7- V FOR11: ERC-06 I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I 7- 9- '/ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER /10 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER No • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER . Na SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEVIER NO SPECIAL ASSESS"'.zNT AAk4 CHARGE • WATER A/0 SPECIAL ASSESSRAENI AREA CHARGE • SEWER A/O APPROVED 1ATEIf PLAN ytrs APPROVED SEWER PLAN No APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. y4ES FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS }/,E'S -1c CO M 1UNY(ry FAC. CHA IM O , Z5G l S4 FT D F .S4Ag•• •,r FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-058-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-064-81 Description of Proposal: Reguest for Special Permit approval for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and whole- sale lumber yard and hardware store. Proponent : Curran, Jack Location of Proposal: Northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. Lead Agent: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 22, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David Clemens James Matthew Richard Houghton Steve Munson Roger Blaylock Gary Norris James Hanson Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-064-81 are the following: , 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: , Steve Munson DATED: July 15, 1981 2) Applications : SP-058-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Engineering Department, Building Department and Police. Recommendations for a declaration of significance; Traffice Engineering Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under`RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties„ This Declaration of Non-Significance is provisioned on compliance • with the following requirements : Subject to revision of plans to comply with City standards for the street configuration on Edwards Avenue S.W. 1 Signatures : i ii/', ,Water. - ' nald G. Nelson 'd R. Clemens, Acting uilding Director Planning Director _- /c - - t R' hard C. Ho ghton, Act 'rr Public Works Director LJ DATE OF PUBLICATION: July 27, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 10, 1981 OF R4, v t$ © - THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 omi OMB , ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 co. 235— 2550 0,9�T�O ScP� �O(P July 27, 1981 Jack Curran P.O. Box 6669 Bellevue, WA 98008 Re: Application for special permit approval for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store, file SP-058-81 ; property located at the northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. Dear Mr. Curran: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 15, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for August 11 , 1981 , at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, RogerJ. Bla loci g Y Associate Planner RJB:wr cc: David Kehle 1932 1st Ave. , Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98101 _ " .1 ..,. ',41,,,,,'•,„04,14V,,if I I t,z,i;.4,,,,t • z; ,i' '-, "'Y:'•, %; :' ' •'4"'' i 1 ' '''.' .k.:r 1/4,,t ,....,,., :.%) .. r. : r t.4": .., .4.1..,A•,8, 1 ,, r`,.e:. -tzt, ....k.• P, , i 114.,y..'.'•!''" Ir..' 3.g,,, ''.*4.ek:/,,,, 1",... . '`..e I I 1 , i ( NiVitj 44*}'; .1,,,j :V,iL "' ",;;:r. t,t,,4..1/4, Y,::4, , ., ::%I •:t .1,!-: ..,4:', ,4, t , ,. , Ar.; f'1'1' ''::.' . '' ',. , • , A .' ..!.",,,.... :,..;,:,. ..,;,. . ,, . 7.,": ' N , ii,*..',! 4..',l'.4-: ..'''' '''s4 ..f. 1. ,4, A;.(...- Y.,: `k•••;,. ,tiff..1,-:, 1.;,±,, .,, , ,, 5,,,„;!•.,,.. • .,:* 4, i ., '‘,' /to- ,- *, .:;`,,, ,''t , , flt:4.6 I li GENBIAL Ls,: ATION: A .',,a•g $ih' ADDRESS.. NORTHEAST CORNER OF S. W. 7TH STREET AND HARDIE -AVENUE S.W. , i, 1' • LZGAL DESCRIPTION:., LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN. THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,) 11 , 11, , 1 , • i 8 POSTED TO NOTIFY P*OPERTY OWNERS OF . , ., , ,. ' .';`', 1 4 c--,, .„. ,; ,,;,. ...kis, in 41.,t. ' k t'll'''. .1 ,.1* , f, , ,,i,P.: A,,,,.. ,,, ,, ,1,,,-2ig ,t,A.;: A.- , . )0. ‘," A L g' ' ' ' ' a. 410,1 14. At' ': -Ltive...1'. •1,,;,-,,,,,,A' zsi—',s1,7 ',1 --,x'P --,:!, .' th ' )., , 4• ,7, .,111ri, .. . . II 0 ',.!,'E HELD 1 , C 'ITY COUNCIL CHAM1 Et So MUNICIPAL BUILDING ., ., ON AUGUST 11 !,i 1981 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 A•M• 1 1 11 1 1 11 P.M. ii a . • i''..#.! t'•••• ''; 1 ' 2 i v 1 A , , ; '+.1'w,:oi, i TE,•.,..-„, Eit .... • ' •alt , ..., v, .4,0., gli, VI.V., t.I '',... i,'„, , i - ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING PA,'"ovek • , ,10),, ,' ,i• t ''.* ':; te . 1-..,.'.... ' h ,, ,'' rt, ,-•".: , ,. FOR RETAIL/WHOLESALE LUMBER YA , , .,,,,,,,II ' ,... . ," 7 1". , 4 iiii, CI .11 Stio,..,.., 44' ' 4 i' i 1 . , HARDWARE STORE p 4.); , , , 4,..„ J,F . , , 4., ,...„,,,. . ,,,.t., f,,,,*-. ,,,, „ , ii '7..;t:I lAl, rillk GE 4...1''' ! FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE BY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 414i COMMITTEE - DIRECT ANY APPEAL TO HEARING EXAMINER BY AUGUST 10, 198 , 4,61 Ifill F.....- FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2530 A _ This NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATt , , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON August 11 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . CURRAN, JACK SPECIAL PERMIT ' Application for special permit approval for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store, File No. SP-058-81 ; property located at the northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. 2. KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Proposal is a special permit for filling and grading for development of flood control facilities for SCS Green River East Side Project, Phase 1 : Proposal to develop flood control facilities to include holding pond and portion of P-1 channel, File No. SP-060-81 ; property bounded by Black River Channel, Springbrook Creek, FAI-405, Metro dike, and Monster Road. ' 3. DESJARDINS SHORT PLAT Application for two-lot residential plat approval, File No. Short Plat 062-81 , variance from the Sub- division Ordinance regarding creation of pipestem lot, File No. V-063-81 , and waiver of off-site improvements, File No. W064-81 ; property located in the vicinity of 1317 North 34th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON August 11 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 27, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Steve Munson, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 24th day of July, 1981 . SIGNED: _ 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . CURRAN, JACK (ECF-064-81) Application for special permit approval for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store , file SP-058-81 ; property located at the northeast corner of S .W. 7th Street and' Hardie Avenue S .W. 2 . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECF-068-81) Application for environmental review of proposed revisions to following sections of the City of Renton Zoning Ordinance : Section 4-704 SR-1 Suburban Residence No . 1 Section 4-705 SR-2 Suburban Residence No . 2 Section 4-706 R-i Residence Single Family Section 4-707 S-i Suburban Residence District Section 4-708 R-2 Residence District Section 4-729 "G" General Classification District Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington , 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by August 10 , 1981 . Published : July 27 , 1981 I - I ' -- • • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JULY 15, 1981 - 5. i AGENDA = = I 4I COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : - ' F• I ..THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : HIGHLAND VILLAGE, LINCOLN PROPERTIES; (ECF-053-81) RaMAC, INCORPORATED; (ECF-061-81) STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD. : (ECF-062-81) ; -1 NEW BUSINESS : ECF-064-81 JACK CURRAN - SP-058-81 Application for special permit approval .! for addition to existing building to be used as a retail and wholesale lumber yard and hardware store; property located at the northeast corner of S .W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. ECF-067-81 CITY OF RENTON (PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT) Application for approval of aerial treat- ment of Panther Creek Wetlands with Dursban 2G for the purpose of mosquito abatement; +65 acres of wetlands located east of SR-167 between .I-405 and S.W. 43rd ' jt r r i..-r _ I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE q, int."... I I I MEETING - JULY 15, 1981 I9- r a� :__ --_ , . , .-, . _. - //iii 1 A' ' " 4 i . A. I 1. , _ ///4). • filli \ - = .\,' li ' tall' 1: ` - >`.. ' 1/4----1 . .', PIM "..."-LISI hb �• ‘"d LAKE t :; &N , WASHINGTON ',, ,■' 1t, ' '' F NM ARMARTIO . 1141 r1►, 4111141.121115' t. tirei-E1 III1A i I "A INIAlto ug igsgal _t 0�®1 11- . r ��IIIIII-. - a�J H., 1 vlstimmr ' 10,. ‘16.--„,4&„,.....mmo -0 velure/ 41P7 .,:,:::7 ii -- J - RI In . Le.‘ -s- '1.\‘.c, .:,':::... I 1 - s m1�:a.®�lliivom1 1r 10-.ti%..h.h_-1 i„ 12. . .i,i 1 V. 1 II - ,, 11110.11111-40::::;;;.:1::: ::::::;- '-fi. -/.71.0-4-..,...r - -..... , ,..,,,,,,, - ,,,......re.,,,i-,,,,.. iiit.......:...,:i. - . Ar... .1 Ng / - I ' , 11,141iVb\,____Jittill lam•ice: t f• .liall' -. "r ''_�1: ` - qirigi-ir: ---- . Plf m -4-„moming .., .---•....._ A .......: ------______...... CITY OF RENTON illifilrlijillitErelliig , ( 1 - ' El Ill , I_ , bill'. �. 111,, . 1 iniyi. - 1. 'N.,. P',..... ' ((r--( 1 :L.' .1 . Air i I I . 17 it C -6 _13 '•' - �,i LAKE 1.). III YOUNGS CITY OF , ft Nk\ �, J� APPLICATION FOR',SPEC�&AL�gE IT .d'n 7/ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY �� QQ' File No . SP-. 658 -21 a• �lVlNG a. / 026 -V Application Fee $ J30°° Receipt No . lePon Environmental Review Fee $ GO4/S/.5'e2 REF: ceF-06</- / _ APPLICANT TO COMP TF ITEM 1 THROUGH 6 : :,. . Name %--- �"�l Phone Wrl - Address 0 CA t t-. Ai.. ls 1�Ji 1 Cl� 2. P-operty location �" 6/0Z,IdelZ ( 'W 1 r 64412 glikUP.12 J. !mil - CXNet.a ►,lr1 kloreqsrl.,1 sr fr 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) v- 6 . i . IZh 1xi 1. �, e : 1 r• LA - b vs a- ci e 6- e i i I M. 14- a tL 1; 1.`!'lAtke tT s D l' ��1-r°c, �cato O . Cl11 7�x, ' di d Llw,lls.21 . Ia -te- a1"Cr 141411.KA• 4 . Number of acres or square feett.I9 6G Present Zoning, 5 . What do you propose to develop on this propertylhill0 b d fM1- /,1�6.F 4 ice/ A -1. �.1. , , 1.��� 1.16 �..�( . '. r .4 %C..l' Ill1 d ` . P Owl i u+ G 74 el 1Z.V. Pr1Zeie 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale • existing structures , -easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above . - 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dent AFFIDAV `��' .�\� �I T t \�4�s ��� yids✓ � {' 07 d�sa ,�•c• r—c�.u�_ , being duly u;;a \1de a that I am the owner of the property invo ved in this applicatio-n ,� at the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and 'sworn before me - • this 2 day of ; Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing art-Kols(10 N P Of Nofi 3?' Public)c) ignature o Owner ' otv4 10 S gdz (Address) (Address) 4>C2A— (City) (State) I 14.3 7 6(0eDoo (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received , 19 By: • Renton Planning Dept. 2-73 4- ' TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS fWJA4LU *, 4 , FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' Application No. .3P- O5'-S'1 ,yam Environmental Checklist No. E'CF-Q(o4-5/ PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance ED Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to 'the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies, involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. , The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND - -------- ---- -- -1. Name- of-Proponent •...,1604 11126.� 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: - •- - • -- - Po.- 'tv(� -! - P L,ey sae.\ vvi-Ei,4c tal tot4-f:e f) 3. Date Checklist submitted 621249 al - 4. Agency requiring Checklist 1141114 96r17 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : - - 6.169 6 Jornckl 'l'a ‘61,1 676 1 _ .mil or L r1 n 4=aPe " ,4go e, , . 1146 %�1' eliCie beet* 011. I Glic 4LeeePiUt2 Lb417 idg.4117 126a.,t %5l -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting, of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental-impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : ' IIu mccr Fie 9akiiitity wii44riTtele. '114t=z tttiout l ,Lrxiq..:1)(2 ilcve2 6Covbp M getwitt. -triay 1 . 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : /912rAtL Rztetrr. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions-, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: .01.1442 . fiCe -tb1,2N 1 iiS-k jl b U 611145 - lti-r . .Lb itj kirrE 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your. proposal ? If yes , explain: lib, lie Oktcr to .r s .1447 Ozott44 -iicki W cat. 1145 aft 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes, in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE N (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over.- 'X __ • covering of .the soil? YES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MATE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any . unique geologic or physical features? YES MATTE NO (e) Any increase in -wind-or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MITE NO _.Explanation: _ ... u. hr►e 6 1.1 1-4�y ., C 1r L;p el r012. ,tt�Jc.t x ..,i -3- (2) • Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14f (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? _ YE'S MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? )C YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO. (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? % YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Ex s l •na.ti on: L v %I N Itg 1021016 JZ 4171104. (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing x species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 05%11,614trargt2 011,14M1111111.111MrYES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 1>IZIgVv, -4- r,. . r (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: e (a)• Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of ' any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? - , YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? {{�� YES MAYBE NO . -Exp.l_anati on: �® an _ (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? I YES MAYBE Ex lanat.ion• 4 I L K . 111 _ _ _ _...._. . Koirtxr Pbc, Lka Mtiktiriebirr 1\b* QtskieacrrovA. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or f glare? _ 11,,,E' , I I ,, Liattruc4, `tv `YYE.S ..MAYOBE1 CNN OOExplan.a.t•i on: ,�i1 t�l� 1C11 �}�Ll. I LC�/ �`►��.i1ie, (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the p_resent or planned land use of an area? �{,.� YES �MAYBE/ BE��N O xp.lanation: 1:1162 ��V� {.�'�t�^'4 (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: -- _. (a) Lncrease in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO ..__ .(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural -resource? i YES MAYBE 0 - ---- ____ - ._ Explanation: ti' e ! JI rI 1 j . . . (10) Risk of 'Ups'et. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE 0 -- - --- -- - - NA Stpolgit., b b pry. /bl.8. Explanation: _.. -- t Its .. trD A l �A (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- buti;on,,,density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? - ``, • YMAYBE M ---- - - -- _E l.anat.i on: s;C�p. .,� (tR f it _ Y` ILL .- _ __ - Wwct fit• , ,., -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? - YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing -transportation systems? )11' YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE 0 (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES'1�. MAYBE rN�OO Explanation: 1.4 reg. "1n . Qi F. i.CJ-•`ILC.l rer) i2 mod- i 170 Fir2St12.16N1 Fil4111trictj . (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need 'for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYbE NO Explanation: Wo Rice-A:49a4 Wilves itl • * , (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ��'(��,� YES MAYBE _ Explanation: �► Wiu..tge, It IA 1 . 1, -it LUterrr 1rt 1. (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? YES MAY E NO -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? 1� YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? ]� YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? II.F11.. ' YES MAY E NO Explanation: N(( Il v =� U"rl51L1111.0 ". �l ..t uJ Hb J ryi c 1 6544Erz RAN/milker-Me • OP (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: u • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive -site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11: _, i.� �� .!►, $ I t1(id OP Jar (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the . quality_or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ll YES MAYBE 0 --,---E.xplana,tion: �.1L� - (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE TS. Explanation: W1 • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that "the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack ,f full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 01 'signed (n ame(name printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • ,. �� david kepis, iitect -C�U�[ F VEi n, �]S�01i zr IL 10640 1932 first ave. s--- 302 ,) seattle, Washington 98101 {'' '"ft+" 6 [2061 624-9495 DATE / - I I l!bi JOB NO ‘dt! ::::" ATTENTION TO � RE: %A6C.,16. et.ir2.)24 1 GENTLEMEN: — WE ARE SENDING YOU If4,. Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings rsPrints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples D Specifications X Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I te)GINhL t1ecfple op i I iI + 'Z Call Cr i a 4 l : -1- & 021901 i .1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return _corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS - •, -,, '" \\\ rJ J �•+ 1r I Gj . i COPY TO . SIGNE t FORM 240-2 Available from u ee/Inc.,Groton,Mass.01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. eceipt # _ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME f‘ • ' DATE PROJECT & LOCATION /4]...7-•-•91'31 f',AY 0 4 + e Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total r" t /r(1 , yl_(% Environmental Checklist 6 0 4,c41' ‘33 nvironmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee 4,7 Qs, `7 TOTAL FEES ; PiT Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. cdU1Nitai OF FILE Fig TITLE A4i1 / 6, Ifel 92 2/,te) R "510 (5I