Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-082BEGINNIi4G OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED r Vi •_T- VI ..1( M,6.0.. VTR •••.* =•-,... slt• ''..,;;.,,,'''):,..'":' .t,V,7:, 12 ,rei.....V.,-__t-,: r..., t2'}'j.P7.44'' '",:74`.'2-0c--1 I i;'1: 11-lit' L- '-1- '' .... /i --- : ' •• . 1 a •4: .; a_ 0. • C.,.....1 .,'. ',en:.' i, j•••7.-.,,,,_.4. _ 4 --____ r,;___. 6• s.14, -;i:_;_i_l '••• -.;,.'-'''''''':"'4.'... ':'• 1. ______. 1 e -------:F6?--_tv' s"'...'""'" .1 . 0._--.. 2.., _..t•, el.,,i f;=-1 -',1.1%.. t- ... , ..,......1.4" -I•-'''' s' .-.....7,-C..,, ,L-.-- •--: 77-.."- i.._.. - v.,.,. -,,,... ._,_i„..if,•,_.• -:-.,--....-...,- RENTON , s .v1 __ _ • , :f•-- 1 4_ .4.,.., - 4,--",4!'.14_43 41 .:.,'1111\• • RT.,.. ' 1 I .1 q_4,, I 1 '4 4 11'4 1• " ' 3,-- --1 '4.4.;- I 4r;;,-;11 it -,11, ,tt;•i.,1,1 •i •V , .,.,..,,...,,_,,L,f I INI Is- .. •...., 4 2-._-_!. 1 . ! ...4,7' Val _ _-2. 1 1 iII a .1, _C-- --...7-71, I, a o....., 5......• I' I Il\' . • .' P 9f ji ''' ''1 tlk I 64? •.•A; / 1-- ,.:......... ---•-- 1 i •''''"''it,g ; i 1.,,1 LI l'i. r...7 1_".” si r . y_ . -, -1 :i 7: t.c.-.'6 `.1, ';' i at,at.CY !I li 1 \ 1. I r fs....; 6Tot,... 1 ,. , - L Irl' t .... • ,...“.r..--e.i.,.....- \,.4 s•wo.••••c.....-.1•••..... i • ;6 7.„„t\ •1...-ThA 1:r.K E,-: j 1,/,.1-',.••• i _1_1 , 4.: / i, / --....• ':.'-• --• I <-,-........,..,.t• _____„„“.„,p.„;,. 71 , 1 2 r. • - q.17,1,..,---- F.dif..,• • . •.1'..,--1, • 0).: .0 i ,k,_ P. . ,... I v-,'• ' -,.“-.-- i -1-g.-1 M.t- -9--.---.'- - \ : 7 1 S L I r.e•N*.el , ,I 1 I ....A.-.......k , ".'.' / I , 11 • l 1 fi_ \ i 11 C'-' 1.6-'‘Y-Yit'-' 1ST --1-1 0'7.1= 1•-1"--;.. a/ ;1. l• r_,i 1 , 7 mig, ,,.. ----•- r TT7 ...•Et ti- 1 .:...--r,---....7-7..---1-4.:,...-_-__,_=_E-_,_-0:-_,-,_- -R,-.-,...._,_ s...••••!..-1,- tTh 7, 2 0 z . 7-si:.... .... -;.o.....• UX PCSLA4I PTION:0-- c,....u.••.....)....., The Went.129.05 4.of Oat port.el Saverne.Lot/In Sect.25 loornship 7,0.s 1.4,05.."...(....) 23 Norte.3,1 last.51.41.In 21•2 LP., eashIng.lyins Pest PI 2.2 5.2.3 rraeLlep 3> 1"..-.... "Pio, 2e.e•d ...Cr gr.)T.". Llent and Peter right of ray and 5..3..4 tut of•line conveyed to tne State of Wash.. pd istdrsteeltr.v...fat•IT by Karr.,P.recorded ta"Ser 21n3 County 2.2.220.5 PI 2.2.•"5"....-.-1y.....selltteel. _ PdcordIng.Ler 6.21163. 66- - M.K-.61.,-...2°.6..e.o.asp•6,p2..ta. L.-1--,-. I • : ,.••• 7 7 7- e;,''" . iri...__ , ,..7, I ' 6,6.4,PPP.P.P•J 1 ffievA-rico - &cc,."A ,„,.,,,„.,. c....-154....,....c.c.4 d7vvr:Z2 1'''.... 1 . 4 7 Ia.kac,......,, a'a.m.., 1 NO -nr-{ EtC--;VA-PC4-1 - tb1.1,6? 4.-.•,,,,.....2.•••••• ih 1 r s... . 1 • 1 .1 - 1 I " 1.• , • • ne kr6iitcs4,01 4,12Vft.*-,7.41..:••1;ar.S bit% • Tar --'..... .o ..1 - 13,2" WE-57"•F-IVATia.1 -a 1 0-1-&-, 1n'; %---• -•' 1 •• . ..I •• • . '' c. f,..,:e.mo,47r.s.Pa-p....r.,.6....1-.06.6saa•Pe..., s.1il 1 sou.A p 6..6...,436 t,...P,Pap 0 Nota-ri-f 61.L-VATici-i - et- t"e5 f.1-ii--1 c:t.6.V. - euz,.13 -1 i.64.P.,twr 1 ' i ••r • 1... L R L F"--.4. -1 .I.-f^,/,Allel•-1 • e)ux. "6• It0.4.164.. Iss,0 10••••Ciss.5 awe.esalaPfP,Attappe6 1.6s,ta....._ 1 i r 11 fit j I y I gL 5 d c i r11,_1 1 L. ,I 1 1 111Iii II( , i II. A. 11II a 1 III 4 Iiu, IIIIlidj'3 III 11 fL„.1.111 ii 1,: i IDiNily 6D ill-tr* kiIfflCDPI:! { if..1),. lel 0 . g 1 g r,11 1D Ell ii')i1 I iiji lir'r;1 oa,r tam.c' w.e e .ti' 0d 1. ri• 6 f 1 u r 1 Y GFFtGZ •W GEU JT ea z EI®r ttar,was.ua c, ,i draw. N architects cis 1 o..• 130 k.kea"ya...sand.waaiu••120••®O 3@O QB03 6,r wa.sr_&__flax CP"ir.4y aaaa moo. wiaon aa . 1 1 V i1 71...A.r-ITits.1 .4G.1-1ErDuLe. x,,....... ,,,,r,......,......,. H...,d .....,,,,,.. F.La.r,C. La.....I. eIt I.A.LAAI0A 0......... 0 I100,0e,00....a.ro.-in.r.0.1 po....a...0.5 .00 04-a; 0... T...00....• C 0 /01........eA.A.A0.....10. N....10.12.,... 0.-1c....-L 0,ro CO ,s'-'4- 1r(?--- 0eir L ID- iMI .000.0.1,04 0•011f0rW..u.1.04 WA cbleulT14, I el tMaj Adm.... 4......0:0•0e0.0 40* ...Caw.. ill 44-2> Si 14 1 C 100i0Ife'A. 11) CX.114.1.-kbr-Ci d • r... c t a-•...-.1 1„,..,. lircre Toes. A4aik 0.., 4.0.-,__.......*, 1 OS LAI-IrDSe........F.E. r-L...,.......1 al 7 T. 1fYA 4 L 1-JarrE. . i,i1rIl 01 A=. m...e.---,z_.— - rP UNLESS OTTIONISE 900,IMO MO.Tr-RETAINING POSITITE COINAGE d t‘li, , . 4#1 MN.OVEN TOP SOIL AREA LOVALTIen r FON ILL MIAS 1.11E IN ILL FLAMM STOS AS VILIFIED a i .t lk,i•:,-.;..,tfr..%, PLATT ALL MSS PLAATIBLS MUSS 010E10011 WED IN 110.021101 SPALIM 1 '.."ill'' N'tlAji- I AIM TRW AnD%CAS AS VW-SEE PLANTING DETAIL i iAlpi..; - .-...;117 e-01( 0 1— — MIA ICU NO FJCVLEE6E OF OWING PLFA Z ay. ALAN Mho POI SITE ALEN A(ULM MAUR I ASSOC. 1 A'''r'''Zre,I.:-.."'' .1 TAADSLAPE RAMA TO IC=ACTED NINELDIAL AV MI MOMS On AntEIMAICI ac4 a 1.,....L. .44.4,,,..;- LIADSCSJI DONTIULT011 TO FAINTAIN MTV MAL WHOM It- 2 i''' --7,1tfts-2-• ,t.O'e'r"" wer,Loam NT TNE TUC OF LATILAJAITS IF<1 CAL.PUTS ImATAILALLE 0..,‘0,0.L. 1200.011rf i VOMIT 10 CITI FOR SUR 0.1iSE ti ).-.1 00.F.. I t MGM 6•••• WPM, li g1 cta1 V.r.tr"" 0 - 5:1 loNAY M..,Vex Nv...00 REA-KR R.RIS ." .' .'. VAC,TREE LANA&tElon.um Mem ro To Anc. La- 00,Ca0.0.0..C.405•R ob• R]01 R.Leam,„ 7.44, 4411 1 .r. t-l-r 1,....1 ••• A...r..-4 •STA....fe-1 1-4 4^ 0 err....II-•• 4. 5 A ill 0 li il .1\0 SECTTON A. 4 14 Iti 5 ,G)=-1:6-.1L- A1 5 k.t d,..... r ft CIT- 1 I SECTiON B. r lance mueller S associate architects eUILCJING DEPARTME_N`P' IOUNICIPAL BUILDING January 26, 1982 0o g q kind_ NUAVE 9 ;' 2'j 1,,r, Mr. Roger .J. 'Blaylock THE CITY OF RENTON Planning Dept. Municipal Building 200 ;Mil1 Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re. INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (Jerry Ivy) SA=082-81 EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY Dear Mr. Blaylock, The topography at the south property is such that it makes emergency access through that property difficult. Therefore, the owner'.has decided to provide''emergency access near the south side of the property (see' attached drawing) . The access would have some type of locked mechanism and would not serve the site except on an emergency basis. This will avoid locating a driveway on the sight-restricted curve of the West Valley Road. In order to satisfy. traffic circulation requirements of the Fire, Department, we have provided a drive south of. Building "A" and "Fire Lane" south of Building "D" . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call : Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS ED LINARDIC . EL:nk cc: Debbie Sadler - Industrial Park Co, 130 lakeside • suite f • seattle, washington 98122 [206] 325-2553 lance mueller aia,csi • associates:robert olschewsky,eileen furney a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects V , Affidavit of Publication c‘;'/e . NOTICE OF • c' PUBLIC HEARING 'STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. RENTON LAND USE, 'COUNTY OF KING HEARW .'fINER , WASHINGTON.:RENTON,WASHINGTON.: A Public Hearing'will.be tinny Rabago held by the Renton Land being first duly sworn on Use Hearing Examiner at his• regular meeting in the coun- sh e chief cl erk di-chambers, City Hall, Re- oath,deposes and says that - is the of nton, Washington, on • 00THEDAILYRECORDCHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a A. M. to considerr i 1 the at follow-week. 9 That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been A.M. to for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, ing petitions: printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper 1, TERRA NORTHWEST published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is HOMES, INC. (COTTAGE now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the LANE) — Application for aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Conditional Use Permit for 7ChroniclehasbeenapprovedasalegalnewspaperbyorderoftheSuperiorduplexuniteinP-1 zone;fileCourtoftheCountyinwhichitispublished, to-wit, King County, CU-072-81;and Variance to Notice of Public Hearing permit variable setback witth- in the required 20'setback,Washington.That the annexed is a file V-073-81; property Io- R6812 sated on the west side of Monroe Avenue N.E. bet- ween Sir .Cedric Con- dominiums and the Seventh as it was published in regular issues(and Day Adventist Church.• not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 2 • M a c G R E G O R, ROBERT—Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as a carpet clean- of consecutive issues,commencing on the ing business with associated storage, file R-079-81;pro-2nd Novemberdayof 19 $ l pe, and ending the 1194SW. ted in the 1891-Street nityof 3. INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd Nov ember 81 COMPANY(JERRY IVy)—. ' Application for site approvaldayof19bothdates to construct four tilt-up con-inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- crete buildings for lease con-.scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee sisting of office and warehouse uses in: M-P charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 2606' which zone, file SA-082-81; pro- has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the party located on the east first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent side of West Valley.Road insertion. approximately 1/4 mile north y -Lof S.W.43rd Street and east of the Green River. r i 4-y—Legal descriptions of theJfilesnotedaboveareonfile Chief .Clerk in the Renton Planning be- partment. ALL INTERESTED PER- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9thSONS TO SAID PETITIONS day of ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- Novenber 81 SENT AT THE PUBLIC' 19 HEARING ON NOVEMBER 17, 1981, AT 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPIN- IONS. • Notary Public in and the State of Washington,David R.•Clemens residing atMIL King County. Acting Planning Director Published In the Daily Re-, cord Chronicle,November2,.• 1981. R61312 ' ' Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7.79' OF R4 THE CITY OF RENTONUt$Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER11Atp- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593O9.1 1) sEPle° December 10, 1981 Mr. Lance Mueller, Architect 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 RE: File No. SA-082-81 ; Industrial Park Company (Jerry Ivy) ;Request for Site Approval . Dear Mr. Mueller: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was . published on November 20, 1981 has not been appealed within the 14-dayperiodestablishedbyordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the Planning Department this dateforfiling. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 20th day of Ibvember 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 70 day of NoNi e-v\nbP C" , 19 gt . QC6q):- .1‘i\ • C9-0-Id Notary Public in and for tlake State of Washington, residing aticp,n Application, Petition or Case: Industrial Park Co. ; SA-082-81 The minutes contain a £L t o4 the paAti s o4 necond. ) I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 21 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS Sea-Port Dozing, Inc. : ECF-587-80/B-236 OLD BUSINESS ECF-092 INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) SA-082-81 Application for site approval to SM-94-81 construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone and associated application for Substantial Development Permit; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River. ECF-087-81 MacGREGOR, ROBERT STAFFORD R-079-81 Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as a carpet cleaning business with associated storage; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street. ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS COUNTY COMMENT ON CITY OF RENTON CONCERNS REGARDING LIBERTY VIEW ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. ECF-094-81 SMITH-RING CENTURY 21 B-267 Request to install one (1 ) 3 'x4 ' double-sided off-premise sign at S.W. corner of Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. November 20, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: Industrial Park Company FILE NO. SA-082-81 Jerry Ivy) LOCATION: East side of West Valley Road approximately one-quarter mile north of S.W. 43rd Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval of four (4) tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses. SUMMARY OF ACTION:Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 11 , 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on November 17, 1981 at 10:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the Planning Department report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments Mr. Blaylock corrected Section L.2, line 9, from (1 space/15000 square feet to (1 space/ 1500 square feet; line 14 from 46000 square feet to 4600 square feet; and line 14, from 2,065 trips to 20.65 trips. He also noted the existence of a conflict between the Fire Department and the Traffic Engineering Division concerning the number of access points into the site, noting the preference of the Traffic Engineering Division to minimize the number to one curb cut for safety reasons related to an existing curve on the West Valley Road in that location, and the preference of the Fire Department for two access entrances for emergency vehicles. Condition No. 4 of the departmental recommendation was deleted by Mr. Blaylock, who advised that application for the Shoreline and Flood Zone Control Permits would occur following publication of the Examiner's decision on the matter. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Representing the applicant was: Lance Mueller, Architect 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 Mr. Mueller objected to Condition No. 5 of the departmental recommendation concerning resolution of the access matter either through provision of two access points or execution of an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the south for emergency access through that property. Following discussion by Mr. Mueller regarding concerns related to Fire Department requirements which are not denoted in the Zoning Code, the Examiner stated his opinion that he would not have the authority to vary a Fire Department requirement, and • suggested that the applicant request modification of requirements by the City Council . While the Zoning Code establishes certain requirements related to land use, he advised that other provisions exist which also must be met. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. Since there was no response, the hearing regarding File No. SA-082-81 was closed by the Examiner at 11 :07 a.m. SA-uo2-81 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant, Industrial Park Company, by Jerry Ivy, filed a request for site plan approval for four tilt-up concrete buildings to be constructed in the M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject site is located on the east side of the West Valley Road about one-quarter mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and just east of the Green River. 7. The subject property is located within 200 feet of the Green River, and therefore a substantial development permit will be required under the provisions of the Shoreline Master Program. A State Flood Zone Control Permit is required and is subject to review by the King County Division of Hydraulics. 8. The site is located along a curve in the West Valley Highway, and the Traffic Engineering Division has recommended that only one driveway be established at the north end of the subject site to avoid potential turning movement conflicts. The Fire Department has indicated that a second fire emergency access will be required to provide access to the south side of the property. The Planning Department has recommended an agreement between the applicant and the abutting southerly property owner permitting access through the southerly property for fire access. 9. Pursuant to Section 4-730.030(2) , a ten-foot landscape strip is required along the property line adjacent to the public right-of-way, the West Valley Road. 10. Resolution No. 1923 requires habitat mitigation landscaping be provided for 2% of the site area, and the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 5% landscaping within parking lots (Section 4-2204(8) (B) (3) ) . 11 . The applicant proposes constructing four tilt-up concrete buildings with square footage ranging from approximately 17,000 square feet to approximately 34,000 square feet. The structures are proposed to serve a mix of uses. One of the structures, the smallest, will be exclusively office space of about 17,000 square feet. The others will contain a combination of office space and warehouse/manufacturing space in the remaining structures. 12. A total of 30,500 square feet of office space will be constructed requiring 152 parking spaces. The applicant proposes following the more restrictive parking requirements of the manufacturing provision for the remaining approximately 75,500 square feet of space. Whereas warehousing would require one stall for each 1 ,500 square feet, the manufacturing standard chosen by the applicant requires one stall for each 1 ,000 square feet. The more restrictive standard would permit the occupants to establish manufacturing operations rather than strictly warehousing or storage. A total of 76 parking stalls are required for the manufacturing component of the proposal . A total of 228 stalls will be required whereas the applicant has proposed 226. 13. Further conversion of warehousing/manufacturing space to office space would demand additional parking and the current site plan may not permit such conversion without a corresponding reduction in building square footage. SA-082-6i Page Three 14. Lighting of the subject site at night raises traffic safety concerns because the site is located on a curving section of the West Valley Road. The Police Department is concerned that incorrect placement of lights could cause temporary blindness of passing motorists. 15. The concrete structures will be predominantly earth tones and accent colors. The landscaping plans are incomplete and indefinite. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The site plan as conditioned below appears to serve the public use and interest. The four concrete structures will be predominantly in earth tones and will be surrounded by landscaping. 2. The applicant has proposed office and warehouse uses but has indicated that parking will serve ,office and manufacturing uses. Therefore, the applicant will have to provide additional parking to meet the code requirements. Any increase in the square footage dedicated to office use will require a corresponding increase in parking for that use at the ratio of one additional stall for each 200 square feet converted. 3. The landscaping requirements are controlled by the provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, the requirements of the M-P zone and Resolution No. 1923. Specific landscaping plans will have to be approved by the city but must comply with the 10-foot setback requirements of Section 4-730.030(2) and other provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 4. The Fire Department has required that the applicant provide a secondary access for emergency vehicles. The applicant may provide a locking gate at the south end of the subject site to serve this purpose. The locked gate would not serve the site except on an emergency basis thereby avoiding locating a driveway on the sight- restricted curve of the West Valley Road. The applicant could also enter into an agreement with the southerly property owner but that agreement would have to include provisions preventing the erection of obstacles between the lots which would impede emergency access from the southerly site. Whichever method the applicant provides will have to be approved by the Fire Department. 5. The Police Department will have to approve the location and impact of any exterior lighting to analyze the effects of such on the traffic using the West Valley Road. DECISION: Exhibit #2 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . Exterior lighting is subject to review and approval of the Police Department. 2. Emergency access via a secondary entrance, but not to include a second continuously operating access to the site, shall be subject to review and approval of the Fire Department. 3. Landscaping which meets at least the minimum requirements of the codes and ordinances shall be subject to review and approval of the city's landscape architect. 4. Parking shall be provided to meet all office, manufacturing and warehousing requirements of the city's code and ordinances. ORDERED THIS 20th day of November, 1981 . Fred J. ufman Land Us earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of November, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Lance Mueller, Architect, 130 Lakeside, Seattle, WA 98122 SA-082-81 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of November, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman and Members, Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 4, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further :action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PJLOl1'u1[j1C71IL.VI A i\+i' i'i'1COR.il TO THE tr/Ar: ING m:H R PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 17 , 1981 APPLICANT: INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. (JERRY IVY) FILE NUMBER: SA-082-81 A. Sui m of m NY & MURPOSE OF 'c 11( IE ST: The applicant seeks site plan approval of four (4) tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses. B. GENERAL INF D,i„i m T]L : 1 . Owner of Record: JERRY IVY for INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. 2. Applicant : INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. JERRY IVY) 3. Location : Vicinity Map Attached) East side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street® 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 6. 36 acres. 6. Access :Via West Valley Road. 7 . Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P; "G" , General Classification. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on November 2, 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City: Ordinance on November 2, 1981 . C. I:]CS17L"WY/I:,nCK(GrOUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14 , 1959. It was rezoned from "G" to M-P by Ordinance 2699 of May 31 , 1974 and Ordinance 2870 of June 31 , 1974 . PRELIMINARY REP TO THE HEARING EXAMINER , INDUSTRIAL PARK L.v. (JERRY IVY) NOVEMBER 17, 1981 PAGE TWO- D. PHYSICAL BAC1 GTAAI ND: 1 . Topography: The site is basically level. 2. Soils: Puyallup fine sandy, loam (Py) . Permeability is moderately rapid., runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for row crops , pasture, and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The only vegetation consists of weeds and brush. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides very little habitat suitable for wildlife. 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (November 2, 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is undeveloped at (this time. E. mrIGH300013 CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are presently in transition from undeveloped pasture land and filled land to commercial and manufacturing park uses. A logging equipment sales . ' and service facility is to the south and on the west, is the West Valley Road and the Green River. To the north is a building materials supply store and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and right-of-way are adjacent to the east. F. ,"IF IrLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main runs north-south along the West Valley Road adjacent to the subject site while an 8" sanitary sewer extends north-south along the easterly boundary. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : METRO Transit Route #155 operates along S.W. 43rd within 1/4 mile to the south of the subject site. 4 . Schools : Not Applicable. 5. Recreation: Not Applicable. G. LIC c,LL SI tC"!P'Y*IgI S OF 7:4ILA Z oIsl nn cam: 1 . Section 4-730 , M-P; Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICANIE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ®'!H R C 7 'ICICAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Green River Comprehensive Plan, June 1976, Objectives, pp. 5-8. I. IMPACT ON '11rHE NATURAL OR M ii M A I I ENVI ; 7C'. 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. i PRELIMINARY REPOI '0 THE HEARING EXAMINER INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. (JERRY IVY) NOVEMBER 17 , 1981 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment : Some increase in employment opportunities may be expected with completion of the proposed structures . This may vary depending upon the ultimate ration of office to warehouse. 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4 . Social: Not Applicable. 5. Traffic : The subject proposal could result in a traffic increase of approximately 999 trips per day (356 - office and 643 - warehousing) on the West Valley Road. This would represent an increase of approximately 5% over the present level on this street. J. E'Ilin 4omr INITA , ASSESSHroVilt(RES%0LD i 1ET'EI•:I'I I ivAT'Ic : Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on October 26, 1981 . The appeal period expired on November 9, 1981 . K. ECIzs/D9. P•A le I 1 uoIin's c*NT 'I'ED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. ,''i DAP'-;it I r r NT ",' !'SIS: 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning which designate the site as Manufacturing Park. 2. The applicant proposes to construct four (4) tilt-up concrete buildings (+106 ,000 square feet) for lease' consisting of office and warehouse uses on a +6. 36 acre site. The office portion will total approximately 30,500 square feet with the remainder comprised of warehousing. Parking indicated for the warehousing use has been provided at the standard for manufacturing 1 space/1000 square feet, Section 4-2208-3A) rather than warehousing and storage (1 space/15000 square feet, Section 4-2208-3B) . This measure provides approximately 23 additional stalls over the 203 required by ordinance. This would allow for possible conversion to future office use for as much as 46000 square feet additional space. At 2, 065 trips per 1000 square feet for Office Park use, this would result in 95 more vehicle trips per day or approximately a 10% increase over the levels projected for the subject proposal. Such future potential should be considered in this site plan review, particularly regarding the circulation pattern. 3 . As submitted, the proposed site plan conforms generally to the setback, parking and landscaping requirements of the M-P zone. A detailed landscape plan will have to be submitted to the Building Department for approval to insure compliance with Resolution 1923 for the 2% requirement for wildlife habitat and the 5% interior landscaping standard for parking lots of Section 4-2204 -8B (3) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. PRELIMINARY REP TO THE HEARING EXAMINER r INDUSTRIAL PARK JERRY' IVY) NOVEMBER 17 , 1981 PAGE FOUR 4 . A pre-construction conference with the Fire Marshall will be required prior to future building construction. 5. A latecomer ' s agreement for water will apply and water and sewer plans must be submitted for appoval. The Utilities Engineering Division also indicates that a water main extension will be necessary. In addition, hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Department and, a fire flow analysis will be required. 6. The Police Department advises that outside lighting be located such that it shines in on the buildings and that burglar alarms be installed on each building. 7. A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is required and the proponent has made application. 8. A State Flood Zone Control Permit will be required for site development. 9. Relative to #4 above, the Fire Department has advised that the single access provided by the applicant does not comply with fire code standards. Therefore, two options are available. a. Revise the site plan to provide two access points . and allow traffic circulation around each building, or b. Submit evidence of a satisfactory agreement with the adjacent property owners to the south Howard Cooper Corporation) for emergency access through that property. M. DER" t mmo TAILmolioN*Amos Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the site plan be approved subject to: 1 . Submittal to and approval by the Building Department of a detailed landscape plan. 2. Satisfaction of the Utilities Engineering Division requirements of L-5. 3. Provision of outside lighting and burglar alarms as per Police Department comment of L-6 . 4 . Approval of the Shoreline and Flood Zone Control Permits of L-7 and L-8. 5. Satisfactory resolution of the access matter of L-9. 1. I ir! 1 if ! I 1 r. r1Y ti. i- + .-. _ ;- F.,R- yE f`ER — —..• . p 1. H - 111+ I`\` r t.r i IrWIi i 4 i I s A/// • 1-' I I I Q rig IF. r N I e i r 1 ai I — 0z + I f I , pr®' I CI a is ., r III,,, suaNcy - , 3 l''-'. T 1 ; ' -"-- I P e) ', .'1 H . 4 1 s4. 4.- . Ap. 2 ": GI; i 4 .. amp i 4 1 i i;' 1; G 1 _ i.111l1.111 III 1. .1'. II' I. . ® \ 1. INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. (JERRY IVY) SA-082-81 APPLICANT INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. (JERRY IVY)TOTAL ' AREA -I- 6. 36 acres t PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via West Valley Road t EXISTING ZONING • M-P; Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Office and warehouse use. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park 1 COMMENTS i 3%. 4J.'. I a, rz.!•P •••••• aa•••••-e• t!s . Tfi''.2. 2;' • -1,'11-rill•1'1 .4:::-,,,LAv 1 t.,.... j,,,,..... 1•,...,......., -.L. .- t,....,,•,-, •• 4.,',1,.,i U1- 11-it77.- =171-1.. 7:;ITUP- - .'....ilqi7:i I. .;,—,.': __.:-_- --.:1-,2-1 4 i'. 41%4. I ••••••''. sir • •KROH R. A.,......•„.1- ,- 1_ -=.---eii., r. -,-.---H.-••:- - .;;•• .' 7:. .--. tty.11:t..'.—A '-q.- ; - •-•z.MI• s,,•,./j,....1._....,. r t• I.el. )•'!" 1 i 'fl.. f,,—-4.- __. . 4 1 , ft,,,•: , ,,, , ,__ ,. ..".. .... .... , _ ___. -.-....., !_____...._L.• a..., ., , c :‘, a •.4-iii! -i p- •p • •rr •..4 1 6 • S.: s. • • ir ._• ;:- . ..","116E17..1 I ' i 1 5.43.0. 3111 1 it fi i°.Ia.2- ,_ u._ ''" 4...4 ,.t ,F: 1 1 / (.-6sx,s., . I .1 1 . iteces.;,,.....b..._ aV c..................:1 ',4 i ICI! iiif..e-ettEiPTI ,e;', 1 I 1 i/A ,.. .,.&"/ . C-......;•wle..4*5.fi_-_-... :::I k- 51.7.7::r;;;..) _.I \ , •••••••., Wr.4/.1: 1 ,7; erws.......1: .-ti, I z,,.. P. 11 ' I . 3 Sant ' ".. ••1": 4 .-C.- . I t i',.' tet-/. : •'-e...!"; ''; .714. 7 ..I -- f....at.. . 1.1. fa,drl. , i i b..". x....,1 L i.....,•. !..; 4 A • .I '. i,1• 15:. /• • \ - ".••• i ...I....•••-,f.44. :r • k CI*.\_.1-,a" ei . "1-27-71"' 1 ,g---J4_ • -- . . - 7i - , /, -_.. 1-L. t:... . e 4 l r'V.:. / r l I k •*. 7' -• - - - ' -i..., . _• _ \ i rs. —.?_ i ••, t; I 3 it. '---___J----‘_ -.7.--.4....--- ----—--1-:..--.1—::_t-fl -&-•••-r---,__.....7.--:...-:.:1--t•z:_-_-.,-,.---.z-_-ra---,. .-'--'-.-4.-_' ,.---.--,-,_-___. I . 1- r ,-1 -- P.-J-;el...• -1.,,,,, ,_•-,__'., t......, lb.-,_,.. ,..k=a... .. 1,4- 4. . 4, 1- 1 A.,. . R.....1•1 C•ee......:,',..C....,T L.K.-re.6.14/... v.a.e..........a.,• .0.1. t.'c.v.321.L5 feet e•but feetlen eeL. ........ e ...--ek „... Newel Lot I l•*Iva,r.Wasekelo 44t,.., 1••••••• /I.... tewas... ) g. .. 0a... 11 wry.,•••••.•teat.e.A.le II,Ce.el/. ly, Flee....... AGA 0 k l ...1 5...... 0.1.......44.101 ere awl me Sattleester.e RUA W. 11•4 pe•I,awn,'la the Stet.ef easeleil,1.e.r.',ewe,'4....i...... 6....ra.pi,'A. VP o.•••••....9 P.,...at,Owe reccresa um.II.(Aram 1 1/,A....:..........we.............,....e.41.Oree.W. rar r Ha. or.....re-=.!7.....-•••....1.r.....-......11., i1 -' ' -- -_._ . s.r...sr• td.,4........"_,_7 p t____Ase.....;esokal•6.1.1•Ora.4......,... 1 I I 145...n'tx.'A ,..-• .--- Cie..L.,‘.....fr.....w........... On........•••••• 1 I LI.''''''.'"• . s -- 1' 4 •;.---`""- t ,........ 4 A- 6:4'--- V . •1 tts• t=L V:..•.., ""--"""_._ 2 o'NOC2TH al.-Va.:TO-I - tbU:76,.A"a... 1. Avoi....... corn 1 I 41. •1- 0 1 4 L...1_2_,.. r.a.-7-.._ t 1 . i ,i at'96 • a•••••-•.-a..,.,. • -.".11-140.-:•.••••• rj.,........... :----- ..„•••• . „•..,..,a am'-I,. "IASI." ' ir4- • %sr • CTICr-ri Ar...tr.`H.- -ssa.e'". , -Vile%••,...'•',..14- •!..... - F.7,--=tr.., _ t 4 ..1,- WET-El.L-vAma..1 - saz7 "e5 914 i 6....-:-•.;"•••:-..7.•-.7-..+.4.76..7.--..1 1 4ida.e i.---,--_- - — r-_._V.-•--m--i-m-.-m."-"o..Wr'ree='e..""l••'Wbru'".' •• •g-fs..ini..-a4l...' 4•... f.., ris-is5o•..:,a-..s.et...-.\IIa 1.1VINK, • 4 • . --_-__- i,t r•,...,...•. R.ao.. l.i..fer...•..•..•..•..•..•a•.. e. m.............r...a... 6. 4r0..l..a.cye,er-.ra..re..... rt 11I NORTH CaLlIATIC34 ' 5.4.12"t; S?".:LPTIA eta/. - i Israraw,e sear.weer*pus.irtsee4 i . •• - rft N. §3 b!,5,--1 f;Latt,-11ef4 • ex.rx, .6 10...,V..Nos OW.ffflOwes”sirse•••1 warm ea.,. 03 AT' 41 S••';$ 43,' V• C ' yL 1 a..cm... G ru:..............s.., R 1e sT--- eG r .I z Za'-- y r.^F sr/ „ S '"• fe .... g': 11111.411111111111111110411r 7 . 2ZL*2". 4—: L iie_. 2t ze :. 1 I.r :.:+may. l Nazrr ter- -co- aWr'C 1 d'It r-++a. : v I r--- n 1.'Ts— -- fi-- 7,44 jair_.._._" 4- p ffl at rrj R E.,-6S-r E s/b.Tk 4 - ii r'-a.'(,,' y'.i h Ya 7-- P ate. Nc m v4-f N - ...b. - I 14rwa.a+a*.w-r.o-err wb..re•.o FA i I 4k` p^S' 1:11H 1 r fti ..e. ' WAX.YYGf on YY.Illarr Z ' as N rF/V MMs IM i'E T 12 a11 18 RjOLL S 11.8.0.03 q 1. i 1 4; ' I L iIw_1_®a ,v,-•'a.r7lrJ 61pIwI 0 m o _. p 1. I 3. i..-1. I`ill 14!ip,..- -' 4 I'-y120 t,1171'dl-S c'--y - ir1i e J q dal iva I.C • o 0064.0.1 iz_ _ i ce Z. ltmo7a-a oa® 4 r. II t li f( s.>o aR a ulv a aaba v ua:ss v..,ri it V,. I, s C -11 oev:,n,m nrusa n essvelm sn an os L ill sasm Ina m vim•1ua n R SW w sl t'7' sifa. 3 e f xt 1 l .J[9l Rinb lIDlnalY LLR 6,i VY y 4i,"•f r w ftJ ua n nU.a,m lsafm. i/ rY" J y,.` 1 ,1 lmtm''' RI s-Qa' LI av sn r' n. c s nu n m RI am tslunv i]TM 4.K a( j; ,. Ii.j pr manna v cv o,w n n a i \\_ t.•#`+!+fi-\ 4IlAOasaTMNvcusmnurnmcu•aa V I.7 10f ULU.SCya•.2 VJ.123•CJ6.3 Rltl tr e6W"•3- SF R 6 7 , r--r_ Ti.. e to--,-, u.. r* _ _._ g/ / 0 i / nG b—t-•r4 G D.-iG inO al 1' lb '`'• 9 l'/ ten O I7 ; 1,..3X- 0- --n a z L Ir t+a-.:r• 4.l is 0` j PTM 2. ill P- er_ y w..•+ev 4+.z...+•a.oe•.o. 0gtC)=TS, t IL P•.•..0 71 G j'L-.ne CA.. .a. .J V. . -i w O l .a..... RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:s.ce7__=_E__--- APp,52®v 4-o .-Q) 71®791--v,pd Cc, 442. ddgS lCY) 710 &ex S Co w,r;s°i t ® p i.ec Location: ',.,®eile li 2.4/lefr,_ cw0-4,4, )' u k see/q d Applicant:A4JOj7 /eL e J C_® „Terry j( 1 Public Works Department Engin ring Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 1e/'egI T fic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:I U sties Eng. Division ire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON Ze/2e/si REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L r Approved 'pproved with Conditions [] Not Approved l/GLz cc 7jd dv r -L' /l-G c.r it " Gc./7i` /`"/G`` i,qf% i/l%rdiU 4 T 3a/6:0/.vG 1sc", /j( s s f'0,e Evef A-4 7- 07-C741 DATE• /d 4/5y Signature of Director o Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; '-" t'`{ Approved proved with Conditions ®Not Approved OL: I DATE: le-7 o( Signature of Direl tor or Auth_orized esen__tative UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 8a 2 LATE COVERS AHREEI'3EI3T • 7tITER jl L4/ / LATE CMS AGREEMENT • SEVER NO SYSTEM DEVELUP!ELIT CHARGE • WATER di COMO. PAC. coev SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEI1EA SPECIAL ASSESSIAEAT AREA CUBE • WATER Aio SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AM CHARGE • SEWER Aio APPROVED WATER PLAIT YES. /'Gt2tt eXf Set 6t,frptee Wl 6647,G APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. yfis FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS Date circul d : ® Cc )nt"s due : 40ENVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTmr_wIlEU SHEET ECF - eI . - APPLICATION No (s ) . S --, E02PP, PROPONENT : Ivtd id'p .,et.1 kirk Terry 2v PROJECT TITLE : (•ile ApproVa Brief Description of Project : O0 w recf .. .i I: , Q LOCATION : Vet Ny • ( d4dl )'Vm,./' ,V• ® e-rc) 9 SITE AREA : c2c. I3UILDING AREA (gross ) A) y ®®®- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE F_ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : ' 1 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Lmpluyment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITL ) : traffic impact :: : 14 ) Public services : xxxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 , Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : Q COMMENTS : This dev. is on the fringe of the City limits so police response time will be longer than normal. Problems can be mitigated by the dev. placement of outside lighting that signs in on the building and also the installation of burg. alarms in each building. (the intial cost to prewir is small , and the person also gets reduced ins. premiums for having an alarm system. ) . Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information` Reviewed by : t: D. rsson title : Date : 10/9/81 FORM! ERC-06 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L/C LNG/../V.66RJ! pproved 0 Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7 0P69fa l z57p 6.1 r • SJ-•!/$ 74 v IV ci i D e t-t a v.yu-sk 2 Isee OAA DATE: / / Signature of Director or:Authorized Repre. enttative r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 3 DApproved VI Approved with Conditions II. Not Approved a_. l DATE:Sig re of Di rector or uthori zed Rep ese itati ve b/r7e REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . DApproved DApproved with Conditions ®Not Approved REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:- f “proved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved El Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved SEE COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET L D ERSSON DATE: 10/9/81 Signature of Dire or or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions ®Not Approved ZCLRATTI*N OP N*N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No s : gra74.42.414 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-092-81 Description of Proposal: Application for site approval to construct four 4) tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone. Proponent: INDUSTRIAL PARR CO. JERRY IVY) Location of Proposal:East side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of Green River. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 10, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard C. Houghton, Roger J. Blayloc, David R. Clemens, Gary Norris, Ronald G. Nelson, Steve Munson, and Richard Geissler. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-092-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: October 13, 1981 2) Applications : SA-082-81 , SM-94-81 3) . Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department, Building Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : 471//, l/ 4)/tqi Rald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens, Actingg Building Director Planning Director Ri and C. Houghton, lic orks Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: October 26, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: . November 9, 1981 revisiun 3/ IioI ®w if/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application,: c7 / E A-pen)I/ L- 454- eR-8 r -i f-/-vp cwt.er421-42_ /dqs ye) T® le•e;s6) co H tr S i o r`e hea.se 4,3Se5 Location: r ,de of /i afleV A2G • Qt /•D'r. /4,w/de /YO G*%.5e0 s. Applicant: ,idtijYi r hi' aerr y rvy Pub]i c Works Department Engine•e'ring Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /404/4; / fic Eng. Division1 SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: I /3/0 U ities Eng. Division ire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department El Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 204/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ®Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved 13a/c:/0//r) Esc, /c am DA,TE• :/6 44/ Signature of Director o Authori ze;d• Represen-tat-i-ye--• rccuzY : ___.___REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION Approved proved with -Condi tionsH -----0 Not Approved . . .. _- • . •, _ I _ v _.-_ DATE. C67' 9,(.).L`0 Signature of Dire tor or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 /4/4'8) RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: /7 fi-PAi 01/AL s/-0 - ) -eo r 7 i f7Luio crnc.r,a'i'l c/gs- Iy) Tp tea s Oki tr STI I o-e 6 'ems P g ead'`e hovsc vs?s . Location:415/de of , ct.11ele 15P4 . a 0"0fr. Yelioil e /Y• O SL(/7 L.) d7 Applicant:7K4,/Uf7ej-%.,.( i ,, 4 .err Ivyyy IC :Public Works Department E i neeri ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /Q,Of/9/ raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: //,3/g`DUtilities Eng. Division Dire Department Parks Department Bui1ding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON Ae/2 e/S/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:OFF/c LNG//I/Erg//U6 pproved Ei Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved l-7'.%,e-Sa, / z2/0/ r5' Sa-7125 74 ,---4 Y,' 1, ,- , ,,V, u.v J G i .. .,.,, I o-( vi,,a-r,c4 I r cd. e' . v yu t d!"-' 3, r. ''.-1,.54-._\ ;,,,t,, :,, o --I C P'1 CG' ''. ' G- - 00/1A) DATE: / e/ Signature ofDirector or Authorized Repr ative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ®Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1 i\ev i iuti J/ I iO l /Weyer/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: TE'•PPoo®VAL (54-O ecR-$i) r '7 if/ via c•rt.cr4 44457 v)lea Comps7li o*e e,firee ehovse 4).5 Location: ,/de eAc f ce.//er AI' Q e-4A ilk sea Applicant: 4 U '®4 3ry vy 1:Public orks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /Q// / J/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: /1/3/8/ Utilities Eng. Division El Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 244/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e...t3 Approved Approved with Conditions [a Not Approved v.earAP"-e r 6,:t;65 diy,,or DATE: /0/Cir7cf/ Signature of Director or Authorized Rep"Ditative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Ei Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: Signature of D irector or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 0eirl RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: cc/TE PpAov (sp-oga-g r /'i*vizi cok_cr4Q Kj/c I y) 7t0 /Pa. ca CDA S i , ©fii.e.e Gr/.0,0ehovsco Location:&.,.5/de f/ (4//er,,0449 -D,1c• /c'M 1//e /Y• oleS‘a f c Applicant:Jihiii i4taiv `e . r r y LQ;Dub' Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /s/49 / Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ///3/ / Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Par Department uiIding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 4/264/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ji :'proved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Sign ce of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions :pot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative nCvIJIUfl 3/ IJ0I ®Q® 30 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: c irE tree eji Cs -oga-s r ®f7L cokr, y) ® gyp70le'tt'sa' eimp¢e ®f ®fees freholJ5e, se-s Location: P,51de of I al/er 4" c pr® c. /4,'u/e 4/.tesevq,349c5w Applicant: is i / h,./.4 err y 20 T_Q;Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /0/459KM Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: NM/Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks partment Qua ding Department Police Department 0 Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved LJ Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved SEE COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET LTA D ERSSON DATE: 10/9/81 Signature of Dire or or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: D Approved DApproved with Conditions D Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative OF R• 11, di THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICI?AL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 milloOEM BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 235- 2550 0, 944'0 SEP-C& Z October 30, 1981 Mr. Jerry Ivy Industrial Park Company 4315 Seventh Avenue So. Seattle, Washington 98108 Re: Application for site approval to construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone, file SA-082-81 ; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River. Dear Mr. Ivy: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 14 , 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 17, 1981 at 9: 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, ciFitl*!!:1/1"4414fi/ Associate Planner NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 17, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . TERRA NORTHWEST HOMES, INC. (COTTAGE LANE) Application for Conditional Use Permit for 7 duplex units in P-1 zone; file CU-072-81 ; and Variance to permit variable setback within the required 20 ' setback, file V-073-81 ; property located on the west side of Monroe Avenue N.E. between Sir Cedric Condominiums and the Seventh Day Adventist Church. 2. MacGREGOR, ROBERT Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as a carpet cleaning business with associated storage, file R-079-81 ; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street. 3. INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) Application for site approval to construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone, file SA-082-81 ; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 17, 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: November 2, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of October , 1981 . SIGNED: yL_ M. ff l ; 7 H r ," 17 t41." _. s' : 3' j ` t.+. •• i I { ; rt 05.• N , +• 7sr' yt f' , i- i * ' i,, r Y, n 1 1 t. ;«.. r A• " i,' S % 5: ' ,, ty s* s, : Ca. 4' sMiC!'+ r' 4 ,. ` I ii r • ; y M. l, +,>+ r may"„' ` _ p.. ls`',*+ s + ys 4:- ri, r„•• riG4i4 f $ ' r-' a t> v y` 1° V Lt 9 "€ s fit? ' ++' 4 ` + rd' 4 1y i" f s Y .. w7• . dr A ti 1 b ii } c,. 1a " 4 tgj::+ rp, f" 4. i."_ t' ' k:• ' 4F t, r A 0 . y t4 .' t3,, ,' t' ti,'` 4 - -* e •}. tlt . w kv' ' n• ", n' i , 0. a ' h" a.• n7M' f t,' ra + s} ' + :_ t t qr J. 3.. ; . 1R t•, fit: y M.+ ' r f ' cif 7. 4j w. 4' f :' g. ek. r . v f,. 1 ems.(.`,` Y 4 1 1 1 yf' r f M, a Y"} 1t. f r ., 4„ a ' Y. , , M t I" , ., 4 4t,. 4 A - 4 r, b` " T t , 4 p- t c, ry r 4• f xr' WS ' # 4 7' s .„ f t y r 4 a•, 9. 1Y r, 5 1 t - s ,{ s ,!.• t a..•.+ r., a? AI , 1 '' ^,'•• 4 1 Wit- ' 1 .. e d 4 4t r,, R 1 1 M k ad_ r o- sty r n A+ l wy. f y i 2 t• r L4 riru "`„' ' ' ^ +- 4,,'.,, r F 7 rR , k lc M rrl' 46 t' r' r> r sFPt . r , ' r . a, a•+ f1 [• POri vt, l: 4 1 ! 4., ejA . r c ik. r. t • r' + di 4* 4t s S" R °' 1o i t ,.' t TM t. ' s t` dy L` 1 { 1. , ! r L + Jr Y c' A y ^ tr'* I "' t • o-r" f i x t 4 rYr' rA f r +. i. c} .. f ' 9K 4, v 1 v e r+,< w. t s . ila# r A ' A 4'. Rt a M, 4. ' Y ... w!• R sus '. 44. i* ' h f, w. 4 t t. ., 7 1 Y• y-0 i' tea' 1( A t i ' i !• ` P. R a " i. vim i q 4 d; io, fK lh 4 V, ly.: : I' r c it,, {{,?!:• v R` r .'- 4 t 4. - qt' w, } C ..,. •" t", t!} t z. y'; * ' ;' t. '.,- '' 4 . .. st . { uM i : t. v, i "^ T,'.• } ' , r f. ' i II.. p• S s ,' f41+ Y 1 yet ]_ i r . it k ,* tt ', r Y r ' rF Y` ` r. t• J IN w 4 , ` A A. • ' , y. t it r 1 _ , 2 FIE19L DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-082-81 , SM-94-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-092-81 Description of Proposal : Application for site approval to construct four 4) tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone. Proponent : INDUSTRIAL PARK CO. JERRY IVY) Location of Proposal:East side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of Green River. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 10, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard C. Houghton, Roger J. Blayloc , David R. Clemens, Gary Norris, Ronald G. Nelson, Steve Munson, and Richard Geissler. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-092-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: October 13, 1981 2) Applications : SA-082-81 , SM-94-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department, Building Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : 4iN;fe71' Z--4:7V Ronald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director Ri hard C. Houghton, lic orks Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: October 26, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: November 9, 1981 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. MacGREGOR, ROBERT (ECF-087-81) Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as a carpet cleaning business with associated storage, file R-079-81; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street. 2. INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) (ECF-092-81) Application for site approval to construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone, file SA-082-81, and associated application for Substantial Development Permit to allow construction within shoreline, file SM-94-81; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River. 3. SMITH-RING, INC. (CENTURY 21) (ECF-094-81) Application to install one 3'x4' double-sided off-premise sign, file B-267; property located at the corner of Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by November 9, 1981. Published: October 26, 1981 J NOTICE DEcLARATI NO ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED ACTION FOUR TILT-UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS FOR LEASE CON IST NG O FOFF o _lion F USES IN M-P 7ONF, FTIF SA-082-81, aNnASSOCIATEDIP'PLLTC N OR SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTWITHINSHORELING, FILE SM 95 81 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1.4 MILE NORTH OF S.W. 43RD STREET AND EAST OF THE GREEN RIVER , POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C. ] HAS DETIVIINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, DOES mgolOES NOt HAVEASIGNIFICANTADVERSEIMPACTONTHEENVIRON— MENT. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, DWILL ILL NOT, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.,NOVEMBER 9, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 223-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Date circulated : ® Comments due : /0-704/ EHUIROiNHEh !AE CHECKLIST REt'II[Et SHEET E C F APPLICATION No (s ) o (5 j -0e02 -(9/ PROPONENT : ptdV PROJECT TITLE: 6/?le Appr®Vex Brief Description of Project : k veSt e- R., cow'?1,011 LOCATION : C. Z7dle tee& (a. [/may Pest mot//,®A / 11,44 e /6f d ni kei9 SITE AREA : ±C,dcieS BUILDING AREA (gross ) /te, ®®dam DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW • NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : J 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses :-^ 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : J 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 61/ 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : v COMMENTS : Recommendation : D• 1 DO More Information fr Reviewed by : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : /o/ 9/ Comments due : /0J/49/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIfEU SHEET ECF - Fib APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : Itdti J, 4 Ear PROJECT TITLE : c7 !'6t 4ppleVo.. / Brief Description of Project : e eSl \Cr /•1 /)4. Do'1+0,,,® 1 Vc1— e011e 'e al.(a 5.fe S Con,__' d e,e 'f L 0 C AT I O N :Side C e al (lam L/ey Ast fie;A. ib i 0'! f e efieSty y.'" SITE AREA : 7t4:, 36,,zefres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW • NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : l_ x 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal lifer 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 1 :)):5\ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings :x 1 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI )>< DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : zP 1 itle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Ap/mgy Comments due : /0-.741/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE7 SHEET ECF - " - APPLICATION No (s ) o OR,2 -P/ PROPoNENT : I dvalleja..l -r rv. 1 V PROJECT TITLE : $, e ArprOVGIL1 Brief Description of Project : net uest‘r- c•%• /64 , oV rdv,/'e' ' 9)Pi/I'LL:06(Once 4. 46(645.- y /fed ce Conszni,-eri ( et a , rAger e ZvSPUs[,'S LOCATION : C. id'e &e /. Vet flay IQI• cy,m A /'v,I1'l/ /t efeSeV.'" SITE AREA : -aere0 BUILDING AREA (gross ) /eV ®DO* DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW • NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : i / 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : I 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : i/ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends CITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : (bN4\ JcDOSMoreInformation Reviewed by : Title Date : c7' • atl /' ) FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Avagy Comments due : //e,0.50 f ENVIRONMENTAL CI9EC LIST REVIEU SHEET E C F - Ilia - .. APPLICATION No (s ) ,, «- -e, 2 -R/ PROPONENT : , ditd6dV/11.11 .1 &r C . j Terry , , PROJECT TITLE : $i• 1. e ApproVOL / Brief Description of Project : gy St e. c•e &.. Pev,' 9).1117L146(01/Crek (61 5-.\Crletcam' cons,, 0( e ,,iGdrek eOfe- LOCATION : C. .fit Ie C e'•&/ Vet (fey P • etoen Jk. / , , e svdtesevq.5,''t SITE AREA : ± ,, , 2c eo BUILDING AREA (gross ) /45 y DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW • NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : l______ r: 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : j 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) , Animal life : 6 ) Noise : I. 7 ) Light & glare : V E • . 8 ) Land Use ; north : bexa-tdn'LlThs^S east : JRkl,.,e. s "•rd6./W south : A 4) 'rd o oer Apr/z. west : 6ree.% RI'veyP,°41,, Vett4y gf ittvay Land use conflicts : k.." View obstruction : s. '" 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : y 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) :get gl)-rp y4 356-0d i ce 6'5i'3-",,ve,,,,,; 7/ traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : j 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : J' 19 ) Recreation :. Y 20 ) Archeology/history : 1 _77 COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI VDOS More Information Reviewed by :_ Ve 4o,s150h 1 itle : SSe.1 .H&Lhrre — Da to : /4//3, j FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : /o/ /9/ Comments due : Q /3 e9 ENVIRONMENTALTAL CHECKLIST REVI.EU SHEET ECF - if APPLICATION No (s) m ,..5-4-0$o2 -g/ PROPONENT : IKdVSTreaI &rl CO2 Ter y 2„Y PROJECT TITLE : 6, 74e 4pprot/a! l Brief Description of Project : /ger urS( '6r- /'Tel°e/orot v o q) .// 11PeOlCA 46(4s Gv /u se CQn5,c/,-.-?1 de 40614c.e "act're4e,reoses, LOCATION : C. 5de c W Vet_ (ley Pal Ct4'I'Dlc. /Vft1i /ftertecS10y9`S, SITE AREA : fig,4.CreS BUILDING AREA (gross ) fd QD® DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW • NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :t7". 3 ) Water & water courses : 1,///--i _. 4 ) Plant life : ' 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare:_ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : I'--- 12 ) Number of Dwellings : e i -e. 5Fa-e-e- 13I /Q.e,i r'- Ps-7 - .r1 {o"t I13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : L.are kJ-cuss 5- - traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1--y- 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : e„..---- 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : G-- 19 ) Recreation :v 20 ) Archeology/history : 1 COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : title : 7a je; s6 ii b-/' Date : O / `e/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated / / / Comments due : //e//:07), ENVJRONNENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET E C F APPLICATION No (s ) m gy PROPONENT : IN.Cic0S7y.aro_J kirk Jerry 2%v PROJECT TITLE : $111-e 74ppr®Vo. / Brief Description of Project : ereSt‘f- ccile1)1.. calore WvAi® el M *UP(Onel'e h idf$• d e Carr LOCATION : . foie OEW 1f& itey Qd• c:Z,rP4A. /Vim dieSe05134-- SITE AREA : elcfer BUILDING AREA (gross ) /4 /® ®®® DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : O 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : a L 19 ) Recreation : V. V 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date : 11' !r// FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : if®Ne Comments due : ///® /}/4/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEI SHEET E C F - -li - APPLICATION No (s ) ._ 54 -6,$,2 —c9/ PROPONENT : KdV PROJECT TITLE : 4I•71e A fpre Veld Brief Description of Project : e es" '6 cc/Tie / 4t6, de eiff)71,.//-14)(One rek 46(45.,‘r (€4 s-e Cairsxdr-vvi e "e.t,gx‘ ezdkre ores". LOCATION : £ Sete ®e lf't. (fe-y ROI 040,6 . /q,vtjve ,{r• d W' ) '1 SITE AREA : ±g ,QCyes• BUILDING AREA (gross ) e 1 ®®® DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : A 8 ) . Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 1 10 ) Risk of upset :. 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : xxxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : This dev. is on the fringe of the City limits so police response time will be longer than normal. Problems can be mitigated by the dev. placement of outside lighting that signs in on the building and also the installation of burg. alarms in each building. (the intial cost to prewire is small, and the person also gets reduced ins. premiums for having an alarm system. ) . Recommendation : DNSI xxxx DOS More Information _ Reviewed by : t`D. rsson Title : Date :10/9/81 FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 14, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A. M. THIRD FLOOR CONFE12ENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : Sea-Port Dozing, Inc. : ECF-587-80/B-236 Boeing Commercial Airplane Company: ECF-065-81/SM-92-81 NEW BUSINESS : ECF-092-81 INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) SA-082-81/SM-94-81 Application for site approval to construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone and associated application for Substantial Develop- ment Permit; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River ECF-087-81 MacGREGOR, ROBERT STAFFORD R-079-81 Application from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as' a carpet cleaning business with associated storage; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street ECF-013-81 HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (THE TERRACE) SA-010-81 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION CONCERNING TRAFFIC MITIGATION (see Wm. Snell letter of October 8, 1981) : Applica- tion for site approval to allow construction of . 280 dwelling unit multiple family complex; property located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE go i r-- OCTOBER 14, 1981 A j c k 4 1 ram~/ di ...1.: P Re AL; ... f P pli --,1 1 M 1 I LAKE J i. . 11'N N% WASHINGTON it ' T f !.`ILA 1 fi inibmoral - ,N r ‘..;0111 . 1 , 11111 - , 1 11.rr S iItc1% 1 I PAIN I l , l ' . I K„ mrr,r,,,,,,,,,„..kir` i I=/ GARNER11111. itrokast J T'Iiuiun HOMECRAFT 1141 ----ljMO i NO glfgati on ill I Iu r1% UjjPf lam V. ft. ! macGREGOR M „ ti.r. a 717Afe. .. ,.., _,,, ____ .4 ; 1161_192: Ok I Al (\ii i j li in am:411.Wilblit.-&-. . it, iri gai.:fort i . Ir INDUSTRIAL PARK Iiii 161/111 4r \ 1 1 1 t.__ 1 1111111 L . i 1 J, i rinic 1 \ I C1 1 _:11,N; I 1 1111111I L: 1 'I LAKE i I YOUNGS I 1 1 I 11 i I4..,,--y •••••' I iC.P.Pisf PI I. r f e.see.. 1 1.. .?" .t-e, t-• . INDUSTRIAL PARK f/.-------' 4---. s.ItLi..._7.=..‘Ik ., i U•Tifil .....i:. : ITIJ4'.'.... "t1•1:-i-'-': - II,j 7 -1 -'i •V‘• T- "f-li." COMPANY (JER12Y IVY) i I 'I:. '----- . ..--— .-.:---- ..-:-'- nr.:•3 .r.: ..-''/_.! ..-'• . .- 1 ••,.- i. Lit.,-_- • m .. ::.-..-----•,,,,;,-. 7,1- ' .:'-'•11.--- -....;.!-..--L_-,..[--_---"_..__......- I 1 00 1-[f MY' . \/.' 'r.--'. ''' i rt. • ..N. r r•••*' • -..,sr i i , •re 7 o.- ,s' • ;, • ' •ciENTON , it1 • lz,-:1- -4-'----,, r.•. r4 .12,• ,. • li--1, 1. • 4W... .... I F" ...' • r v I1.'II :,2" ' .:_•_. At 4-it'''t e• , .4.'„ / , --' I . I 1 100.00.1 , I' I r, k •' - A Imre 0._,. .. ! 2 s I, i•i 770 ,, *3' , 'ir-q! .'i i / 6.c..b.:-A: ..1'"",/ ',1 . - , t*ei.--\-' ‘ • i Tr-- T.-156",..i: i c 2:it'''. 1j1! •I4 ' 1 i' i ''' ------'•-5!i::- --- z...;-,:-. ..13. ----`--- ",:-: \<, /I • t..-zw:',1"-•-ii i 'I n•tii!i;a•I E:.T.5, ,re•-,, _4 g I, /"--''' 67.,'...7.• .-;•-•:4_ ' -_,..,"."`;,.7) -:' \ : P./0 10,0..... I I .•II.to.... 1 11 r .?( (...1. .... i • i ,._ / \1-f.:I:7'' ••• ••• I_i ;Ts, 7 , r•4_._ , .._;,:-_--)_77.,,, J — ..... 1 i ...••• ,..„, :i i I it, 1• ' ../':; r"....r A 17.-: 7 --li i-- „.IL-. ------, -,.. ...... I,- r..... I I \ 11 44-C.±....... • • - -,...,. 7,-;1 it \ 17, I 3 d 1/ b., ....,...?.. ,- . • IT.......r & 'ea....0w '..\`•-••-f.-_ J • -— r I,..... • I P.' • ',.....*, * 1 10ITEalFl-kh4 Devg.i...00.Ye.er Local-W:1J/..i 7.....00 . ,...• Viel_o_osmooloyi. 6,6:"X.% gr......‘,.........4 o••••••••. o-t• .1,6 vo.....• -2....., ....,......0.+0 /II 000rs or.,..4 lost.ca.i.at,Coo•co. er Pa,a• wasntalta•lyIng litnt of h..b..1,011. ft..; 000.0.•,./.....{.6.0,... tloot am row..riot or my am;00.0.•tor.• 00 76 00.6.4r7000/10 RI..............i. 11..acap me....p.a. .........-• a................e.r.--..•-ea..• moo.....,:ia....„.....,..,..i.......n. p..s........•:_f,:..,.....wrs la-...444.• .......-...--.. *-7-'"-'-.1 ' • I..1. 4 ' _- --__.___._. , i • ILL.46.. 1 . s. .. .., L,.....-,,..,..„,-,.....,,..,,..._-,,-,4..,. ._-.m-ral• out. . 4.4.,=. . I 44 G,40.......r.........r. , a, 4•.,* Ni_rco, i-,.,, s; z..-...,.-.-.;..-..„....p.„.•..,.... i....i..., 0•_••,. r...:.,o•-.-••,-i•,,/si-i9•1w.,.•.."CY...riii,,• i„ J•• 1 1 .1 . . I.-1iit 5- 7.,,-•,2r,. ''•r' ra.; wrlvAro -m t 777-7- W.• z..,. 4„...:.,.. I. I. 0•.0. i4— _ 1i1 I'ir.;f71,'1. .--.1'.),,Ittilf*"4i(--40-1.4_kAfg-',:-.4.....TgT:-.ftrit ...---: •-•.-11.1:. -At•---: cricv-i A i WEST•El.-islArria.1 - EL ,cz,"6 e I . I 1=1 4..;:t.Milaill..01*iv;•11 t.' tt.' 7:..,.4i;4;Z:Xri4faighs : 4, .. -- 4.__la 1..., or000m•-•0,,,r...ow.••••11111m. 4,-- 4---- SI 00.0.0•Rer 0000.0 A,I.A...we-•••••••• osp.....,al•-••,..rrarr 1.4.,..•ts. 1,1 111 i 1•-1 • -i arm Fo.le..6.•so...ft•or i .......—..,&Ian CI.IIIIII•J . iLiIgif4 11s"-- l 0 1I—-- -=':::: --r: •- •=1 r------' =i4•;:-.'"' "re':I'411141-illil•MIMIIII atag • •' 412----=,... I ,.: .. .-:...mo ,..,..„--.7 : 0111•11001 I eAsT.ethAild14-1 • .eirr, 'e5- Wore T...a•P• I , trino•V"."rot•••moo. i 1 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No. SA- l'ef.? Filing Date Application Fee $ '`3a. Receipt No . OU/ Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY, JERRY IVY Phone 622-0818 Address 4315 Seventh Ave. So. , Seattle, Washington 98108 2 . Property location East side of West Valley Highway, south of Van Daal Distributors and north of Howard Cooper Machinery. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) The South 329.85 feet of that portion of Government Lot 7 in Section 25 Township 23 North Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington lying West of Puget Sound Traction Light and Power right of way and Southeasterly of a line conveyed to the State of Washington by Warranty Deed recorded under King County Recording Number 6427163. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 277,090 S.F. Present zoning M-P 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Four buildings of office and office/warehouse use per lease. Total floor area of approximately 106,000 S.F. , paved drives and parking for 226 cars approximately. Landscaping as required. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ° B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action -- Remarks Planning Dept . Rev, 1-77.; teceipt # : : r i (i CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME .-1414 .5 I/'r e. l .t z b K' J'I,//)..;' v'cr DATE / s `:r,' , PROJECT & LOCATION ' ! i` f rf l Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist '- C) , Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES < `.1 f/. 1 ' Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. AFFIDAVIT I, JERRY IVY' of INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this g day of ' ti , 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Gz`z`P Name of Not ry Public) S ' glature of Ciwnerdi- Z2 a G-(J 4315 Seventh Ave. So. Titre-ss) .. Address) Seattle, Washington 98108 City) State) 622-0818 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has• been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' Application No. ,s5;47- 4sa--e/ Environmental Checklist No. 4 e/ 07—? 6P/ PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: i II Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , ,Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . 'The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completelylas you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. l The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY, JERRY IVY 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: ; I 4315 Seventh Ave. So. Seattle, Washington 98108 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of ,Renton, Washington 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: N.A. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (lincluding but not limited to its , size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A development of four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease totalling " 104,000 S.F.± in gross area. Uses will range from all office tenants in front building to large warehouse tenants in the rear building. (About 31 ,000 S.F. will be office, 73,000 S.F. of warehouse) . Building height will range from 16 ft. at the front.'building to 30 ft. for the rear building. Generous landscaping emphasized along the street i\i\\ frontage. Parking for about 225 cars is planned. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The property is located on the east side of West Valley Highway, south of Van Daal Distributors, west of the railroad R/W, north of Howard Cooper Machinery. The Green River lies to the west of the property beyond the West Valley Highway. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Summer 1982 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : 11 Renton - Shoreline Permit, site approval , Building Permit, Occupancy Permit, 1 King County - Flood Control Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : NO. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by . your proposal ? If yes , explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: N.A. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? x YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief Xfeatures? YES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES I MAYBE NO 1 e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X._ YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) ,(b) ,(c) - The site has been filled by others in the past. Additional fill will be required, particularly at the east end of the property to achieve a dock high situation. Undlerlying soils will be 1 compacted by the weight of the fill . 1 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? I I X I Y,ES WA-MT NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) , (b) - There will be some dust and equipment exhaust during construction, 'After occupancy there will be normal building exhaust and vehicle emissions. Estimate 400-1 Vehicle trips per day. I 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine, or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow 'of flood waters?, X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any Iwater body? . X I YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?X YES MAYBE N f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flood of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO I g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -X YES MAYBE NO . h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available Xforpublicwatersupplies? YES MATTE NO Explanation: (b) , (e) - Most of site will be impervious after development. Storm water will be retained on site per City standards and eventually discharged into local surface drainage system. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YES WRIT NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Site was previously filled. Existing vegetation is ' indigenous shrubs and field grasses, etc. New landscaping will consist of indigenous plant material including wildlife food source vegetation as required by City of Renton. 1\ 7 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) , Deterioration to existing fish orb wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) , (d) - Existing small fauna will be displaced by con- struction activity. There may be some' re-establishment of habitat areas ' after construction. 1 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: There will be some increase in noise level during construction and' after completion due to tenant vehicular traffic. The area already has a fairly high ambient noise level du'e to West Valley Highway traffic. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or Xglare.' YES MAYBE Explanation: Light from within the buildings will be visible at night. Site lighting will be low-glare type to avoid off-site glare. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural- resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Construction materials 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk, of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances : (including ,i ' but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) . in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter ithe location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the' human population X of an area? YES MAYBE Explanation: 5- 12) .'Housing. Will proposal affect existing hous or XIi' create a demana ror additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Estimated total occupant 'load is about 150. Some businesses ' will probably be existing and local , while others will be new to area and may cause housing demand by some employees. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will theiproposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulatiion or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehic es , bicyclists or pedestrians? I X YES TOTE NO Explanation: (a) , (b) , (f) - Estimate 400± vehicle trips to and from the site per day. Parking for the project will be provided on site. It is assumed increased traffic increase potential hazards to SOME degree. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental' services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X EMERGENCY ONLY YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection?/ X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYbE NO Explanation:c) - See (12) 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ' X YES MAYBE N( Explanation: Office and warehouse project of this size will use relatively small amounts of fuel and power. I 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need ' or new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Alterations as required to connect project utilities to existing utilities in street. No major utility extensions are anticipated-. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding I mental health)? I i X I YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive . site open to public view?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact 'upon the ' quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure,, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upo this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willf 1 lack of full isclosure on my part. Proponent: igned J RRY IVY for INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY name', printed) I I City of Renton Planning .Department 5-76 I 1 NDING 1. OF FILE i FILE TITLE , I. e I 1 P 7; ,4•0.7."'.' 1 P7. • p' ". 1,-......., , A• P s.r.„ e-k • .,,:' 1, I . ''''' i 1 61