Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-091N 87- 54-4I wit„,l \ \ I A a NE zit —1,3-4TI3. 30.54 p1t.As M4y) CO 3 O c o th a a h a W 1 N NO 1 LP r,V q, , I c\ 8 A Z v ZZ O off 4 8 a° b 0 L z m 7 / \ I.IA I: 4 o tu M N d 0a 4 1 pt P JO N 1/ . 7 r' 1 i I i u lr i re. IRV 110 ' cn C) 4126r8 0 .°° r 4.1- /16'. 2510 6.3:: 3.1 il Z v or r i I 1 w C ' ''oo 29 Z Al. J 49 E 37 oAO, f"' a„ Y1 1 ',°ZA 2B f , , e,I D P.Se.5 Zi4DS il 77 21 . frr R a4oz°4pe 08 •, . f 27.2 R i ilia ' L N •1 ( N p SP o fE RY Leg' 1C3 , a 6c A'f ' v L O fon u ,• - N. •if • n I a os ' a / Q iros--"' tdiet 0i y5pA', ti je ,•CI I L59 A " I CII3rA., / e?"41 I_ e/ 4. Y IJ v w 29 i'o 4,1 j 0 11/ z 1\ 1!/ C/ G f /r o N STA 8' w J 4 o ZS 'A85 14A QN4Si /- ' G Z Z\ 1 1 1° S' ` / N'r 09 9 0 3go SP o GFaZ O a iii 27 ` h1 01„....„....„,„„:),„.......,.. "-- --(‘(o a/ ° Z me7 e 1 I i / `r w'r. iTR s gf)3 1 1 I .. s, y4_ 97STA / / / ; 4 Q 1 O 1 352/ e3 • n mosey: 00 5f °: la / 3 j, 0, 2,1 r N° /-E/y7o4 Q o :o YOE, 3 S.R.05 ' 5 1' 05 rO 7e 2 °f `G 5 a •a7* zt ° a 0 I / • , 1 / J. . t9 r" L.^ ; 1 e T G 6 ,4,6 4. / 1 f` +•• 2 9•30 N N 2 ; 9=; s_/ , ov AQ N ti / t T y 5 p '° / 5 f 44 a5 12/, J Roof7 yos o, v TH 0 cr) ` y RRP i DEL' o v Qtl ,<< s. 1D _ S:oo S i'o e`2gl I ao 12 1 3Z89CGE . 3 5EE 5E 4 1 z4-Z3-4 Fo 4 7n Poi a q0 tis, l I , 37 - f N87-34 -33W t • •G 13o ' So I,s•• d s.,, ,. MfA S a SE 2 4 —3 4 nF S w. iG r.v sf o.nl ,y 4- f C. D ZH,« Al.4 S r r r[,,_rJfo Gppyr Lir. Na / 1 51".o WO/ Moody BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE tL' " i(- p9l 81 November 3, 1981 TO: Renton Planning Department RE: Rezone Justification The proponent believes the rezone to be appropriate , timely and in accordance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan . Certain actions have occurred in the general area to support the applicant's request. Please note the following: 1. Ordinance 3053 8/79 2. Ordinance 3270 12/78 3. R 344-79 - Pre Cut International 4. R 080-80 - Lewis/Mirante Ordinance 3482 11/80 5. Rezone of Lot 1 of S.P. 138-80 for Emissions Testing Service The Comprehensive Plan indicates M-P ,zoning. However, due to the small size of the property, the owner is requesting L-I with appropriate restrictive covenants if required. Neighboring properties are presently zoned as follows : North - G South - N/A (Grady Way and I-405) East - G and L-I West - R-3 and L-I SIG2NED Dona d Moody o \BCD 1"'\ Larry Brown Z E' NiA w Q) p1 9 ,. November 3, 1981 TO: Renton Planning Department RE: Rezone Justification The proponent believes the rezone to be appropriate , timely and in accordance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. Certain actions have occurred in the general area to support the applicant's request. Please note the following: 1. Ordinance 305 3 8/79 2. Ordinance 3270 12/78 3. R 344-79 - Pre Cut International 4. R 080-80 - Lewis/Mirante Ordinance 3482 11/80 5. Rezone of. Lot 1 of S.P. 138-80 for Emissions Testing Service The Comprehensive Plan indicates M-P ,zoning. However, due to the small size of the property, the owner is requesting L-I with appropriate restrictive covenants if required. Neighboring properties are presently zoned as follows : North - G South - N/A (Grady Way and I-405) East - G and L-I West - R-3 and L-I SIGNED 1... Do—al . ' ."oo 1y ENTp' Larry M. Brown C4\ g w rsq A r,r111,1 '+ February 12, 1982 Larry :'.. Brown & Donald A. Moody 11715 N.E. 145th Street Kirkland, t,'ashington Subject: Rezone Application R-091-81 Centlemen: In accordance with your instructions that you wish to discontinue the subject rezone application at this tine, we are closing our files. We enclose herewith our check #35S5 in the ar+ount of 110.00 refunding the application fee, paid by you on November 4, 1981, covered by our receipt #20456. The environmental fee paid is non-refundable. Sincerely. Rorer J. Blaylock Zoninu Adr*inistrator RJB rip Encl. February 11, 1982 TO: Finance Department FROM: Building & Zoning Department Rezone application filed by Larry Brown has been withdrawn by him. Therefore please issue a check in the amount of 110.00 refunding that portion of the fee paid by him on Nov. 4, 1981, covered by receipt #20456. OF R4 46 THE CITY OF RENTON U ,$Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o NEIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235— 2550co- 0gTFo sEP E' P February 1, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: Mary FROM: Roger RE: REFUND OF APPLICATION FEES FOR REZONE R-091-81 The applicant has decided to withdraw the application for the rezone based upon the City's position of requiring an Environmental Impact Statement on the project. The environmental fees cannot be refunded, however, the rezone fee since we did not go to publication and public hearing, should be refunded. This amount is $110. Please request that the check be made out to Larry Brown. Finance Department record receipt is #20456. OF 1111 o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A 235- 2550 09gT D SEPSE P February 1, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: FILES FROM: Roger J. Blaylock ( j RE: BROWN/MOODY REZONE, R-091-81 The applicant has decided to discontinue the application process at this time because of the Environmental Review Committee's decision requiring an impact statement. The application is considered closed at this point and the application fees in the amount of 110 have been refunded to the applicant. The environmental fee is non-refundable. Kevision i/ Im ive23/ ® RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:ree.7 i"e, /otip else stool Location: A7. 5, sid'iM 6 sIIige AcAPAS fi•imirtatsP" S`t/.4k_ Applicant: , ,'®Mi14 L1'1rTAftgady14,4,______ IQ:Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 0/8/ u I-1Tr c Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Oc//5I9/ titles Eng.. Division LJ'!i re Department Parks Department 0 Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l> J Approved [Ipproved with Conditions [] Not Approved 1e i— ' r S Dim Ci 7"Y I oS • DATE: / ./.7F / Signature of erector or Autho zed Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:1 "U tE UCP7 Approved Approved with Conditions DNot Approved P CAO C -Q.4 rY It.(-) DATE: l / 0 Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Kevision 3/ 1961 f© Wig/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: laPftiejfit l e3 trice p,,,,, sign* 44 Location: it I S. 1bi efc46 4Sfe#dh &Ja de Applicant: SIVI '1A t 444,407 • t la: Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:/aPM Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Mils* Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department U Parks Department Buil ng Department olice Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved (Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) All off site improvements should be installed prior to any occupancy of the building. Grady Way should be widened along the length of the property including a two way left hand turn lane. 2) If any fill has to be removed or hauled into the site, the work should only be done Mon. thru Fri. & a $3 , 000 cash bond be poste fnr strPPt c1 Panup_ DATE: Signature of Dir r or thorized Representative erson 12/2/81 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 ,0 ,A,„ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Ape.ti leo r•ex• rte fro lt6H la 1.4 Location: • ! S. sih 6c 407141 II101 adIght .,4w. LifirrtiPe , ,Set/. (XL x /, c s) Applicant: Sri/wn Li t•Needy too Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:PP /9/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:/PS/SiUtilitiesEng. Division Fire Department Pa s Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON VW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e Approved Approved with Conditions El Not Approved 7-f/1 G"Citi D eq6P P 41-d-S F c L. Gcl J-t-/1i.c> DATE: // 2/ ( Signature of Dire or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1 vixecib\I• sh a" rft 44.1'as\r• t' s. 9mkk,P1.bz Z. tiriobtailrfilAip ,4.44, ir;itovA i t :tike .4h2,* Vit:4* J .wI • iNImpostna s l 0 • . ` ; WitIR)6 Kevision 3/ I98I Wagiee/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: AW a jgHIe aelef/'D/h "6' '7 14 Location:411 3, ded4/6,4&"•l I/II'1 etaisi.4AVIA ZWIliditrPSSt. Sw. XLit S3 *.shy Applicant: 9avii,, Lr,y V dey '0" Public Works Department En ' eering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:/p7/2/9/ raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:q'Si8/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON 41S/$/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: f Approved d Approved with Conditions Not Approved c cam ioti d cI a-kir p/ 41 use, c- yvdIeZ e,e e f , 7'10'' -fe ex c e ael 6/: 6 4_. his A ou/d zA/3.6/ y 7 /_.a6t71 c v L bATE: //—aX -2/ Signature of Director or Authorized Represe ative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 ff / RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET I, to Application: A - e e Location:1< r, sA414; d<<WV IY 7• a/ice#4y/4 L.Wirte wer Applicant: 49,00v11/ Lryc• /fieod , ,tao Publi orks Department ngi neeri ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:,p?,a/8/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:/ //*/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department U Parks Department Building Department El Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 41s/g/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved [] Approved with Conditions 13-Not Approved pat L_ DATE: ///2-547 Signature of Director or Authori ed Repres nta ive REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions ONot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-091-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-097-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from "G" to L-1 . Proponent: BROWN, Larry & MOODY, Don Location of Proposal: North and south sides of S.W. Grady Way between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. & Longacres Drive S.W. (Tax lots 53 & 54) . Lead Agency: Building Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 2, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson, James Hanson and Gary Norris. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-097-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: December 1 , 1981 2) Applications: R-091-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Traffic Engineering Division and Police Department. Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Design Engineering Division and Building Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS may be required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: Potential flood hazard on site from future development. Signatures : W/4, 7! 5 1/2- 1,,(A° Ronald G. Nelson id Ri.. 12:ed :oting Building Official Planning Director R cgLit-1 e ( - ard C. Hou htoni Public Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: December 7, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: December 21 , 1981 Date circulated . Comments due : EK'VIRONlHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 097_ 81 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-091-81 PROPONENT : BROWN, Larry and MOODY, Don PROJECT TITLE : Rezone Brief Description of Project : Request to rezone site from G" to L-1 . LOCATION : North and south sides of S.W. Grady Way between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. b4 LollydeLes DL . B.W. (Tax Lul. 53 & 54) SITE AREA : ± . 72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) -- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE. ( ) ; -- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : X1 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : Vacant east : Industrial south : Freeway west : Vacant Land use cunflict!; : Minor View obstruction : Minor 9 ) Natural resources :X1 10 ) Risk of upset : X1 11 ) Population/Employment. : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : N/A 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 300 - 500 average daily trips traffic impacts : Major at Grady Way, 14 ) Public services :X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : 1 X COMMENTS : 1 ) Flood hazard from on-site development. Recommendation : D\S1 DOS X Mor . Ihformatf9n 2 Reviewed by : L}- `;.; Title : Date : J/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulat is due :SY Corm Ef VIRO\HE if TAL C1fECKLI. T REL IEU SHEET APPLICATION No (s ) . 4-439/4 $/ PROPONENT : 8/'D4/11 j t 04Ddh M' o V f` PROJECT TITLE : i< Brief Description of Project : AP/dm:Si( A Ae=door! sg•T! LUCA T I ON :Ae. CS•Saib o fiG e st#r' C N A as r e f £.J e., 4" O or33 re I SITE AREA : t :Macy. BUILDING AREA' g uE,$ ) ".s DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEWNONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & Water courses : 4 ) Plant life :C, —" 5) Animal life : 6) ' Noise : 7 ) light & glare : Li 8) • Land Use ; north : east : south : ue,t land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 Risk of upset : 11 Population/Employment : z-_' 12 ) Number of Oval 1 i:uj; : I 13 ) Trip e i d s ( 1 1 C ) : 4- , 3 6 l.3--;p e'--d 44-7,-, c,e v r p traffic impacts : l Si fri. i .eaL & 14 ) Public service,; : L/ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : t„-------/ r 18 ) Aesthetics v 19 ) Recreation : 2O ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Rcpmmendation : DN) I_ 4 _ DOc riore Information___ T Reviewed by : 7.4- / Iic1e : 72t eC,(St Dam . P•V g/.____ R1 : ERC-06 Date circulatec OP2.103/ Comme,,,,,, due : 47/3/9/ ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI`'T REVIEU SHEET ECF - con - 8/ APPLICATION No (s ) . iF-QWng/ PROPONENT : B'a4',49,00V/01/ Ziserrr . 4/ Q yi DOh PROJECT TITLE : 0942Z4wF Brief Description of Project : es 04114104re i'04 iter„m"6-"yi LOCATION :41 f Fs%'s0 _I" ' (/C Ave(' 414444.cS&f'r's ref SITE AREA : tCool 7acacrr: BUILDING AREA ( c yeas .. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE IMPACT REVIEW NONL MINOR MAJOR MORE i _ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 00, 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : IT,/ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : VviIpLr.Ip i east : 3irkdoirerViq south : .2-4# ' vest :__.51041etGIO/Pe Land use conflicts : Viev obstruction : 49 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : f 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Duellings : 13 ) Trip ends OH ) : 7006-S00 traffic impacts : 1=: ) Public' Nervier; : 1 ° ) Eneryv . 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : iliolf0e1346016idCiCe e • S tom/, 4 se/ 11-1/),es a•ddt .c o•1 Ie('„ Recommeada : on : DNS' DOS More Information Reviewed by :f viln(ht5Orl 1 itle : SiSod Ptt K@I^ Data 410 K..___ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulat 0.218E' Com( :s due : 413 ,1 9 EKt IROXHENTAL CFILCKLI'T REVIEU SHEET ECF - 4217 - APPLICATION No (s ) . 47-091/7e/ PROPONENT : 48,0441V0 ,Lr, !' Al004fI Ddh PROJECT TITLE : 0472Q/1/`C Brier Description of Project : Appies,C 7 a. ,e cr. 4 Teree:611.."A 4.•/ LOCATION :At. c s sa o dr/6 '4A 4e e Dlt p .,`/r° IV+ Ids I' .s/y t/a/1/ tf SITE AREA : .7aQCrf BUILDING AREA. " y ; DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : ...... IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : I2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : i/ 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life : v 6) Noise : 1/ 7) Light & glare : J 8) • Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : /.cvelo m..c-a` -svue4 jw " -('ro a c%v-eer Mom.,* ad p-i Glu..,..a / View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 Population/Employment : t/ 12 ) Number of Dwelling:; : 13 Trip ends ( 11F ) : traffic impacts : _~ 1141Publicservices :_ e. 1 1 Energy : I.-' 16 Utilities : 17 Human health : c/ 18 Aesthetics : 19 Recreation : v_ 20i Archeology/history : COMMENTS : doro w,'// Li.aa-c. et„cc.PSS 6r1:1 h/ev..s 7i era..43 tea-/ 59' (i.6e.a- - 02 yo resj ca/e-,-e h •n e..,`— o f 7 O / c a{. 12.41,141 674,,,,....4,1- ^'"Q-e'6'4H/A^ S ri, c,ommendat ion : •-N'; i _. _.__ _ DDOS !\ More Information___ _ ReVieved by 1 i ,.1e C3 , 0. : 4f IV c: Cie-et; Pol C_e_ Date circulat Cumr :Is due . Aai 3V8/ UVIRMHEUTAL CHECKLIFT REVIEU SHEET ECF - or? - St APPLICATION No (s ) . OF-Qlile-Ae PROPONENT : 48,04/401 Zgic r. r 41e414 as h PROJECT TITLE :_e640/1/c- E3rief Description of Project : iN vesf eso•re 4VA, er•i:c LOCATION :At. S,S14I,. ( 5:4116'r Lee Ifti./p4.sjpeCw+'4ssrl f '-JAV. 494. .,, frSITEAREA : f .?aQcrp BUILDING AREA kg uss ) ... DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NON[MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : I 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water d water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) • Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : Viet, obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : _ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( 11[ ) : traffic impacts : 14 ), Publicservir r- 1 ', ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : ficommendation : DNSI (C) DOS More Information Reviewed by : ' title : 1 /, 2/6 F RM: ERC-06 ate circulat 23/8/ Comm Ls due : 47/304/ EKVIRO\HENTAL CIEECKLI`'T REVIEU SHEET ECF - OM - V APPLICATION No (s ) . k-0:99/11e/ PROPONENT : e„,„ 1` &r. sr "404 21 PROJECT TITLE : 04240/1/9- Brief Description of Project : Appots7L A MiQ•fe, 4104P zero ovit 6—"A LOCATION :li e5. ' r'i . / I , /Ie, t 4 ,4v, S&/r. asr•f , .J ff ySITEAREA : it .'?aQcre BUILDING A EAR g oss ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :v// 2 )1 Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 17 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) • Land Use ; north : east : south : vest : Land use conflicts : Viev obstruction : T 9 ) Natural resources :1 10 ) Risk of upset : 1, 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Duel l ings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ILL ) : traffic impacts : 1=J Public services . EV 1 ` ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : J COMMENTS : R.-?commendation : D 'r DOS 4JJnformnlile : Date circulat 23/8/ Cow :s due : 43430,/ EXVIR0XHE?[AL CHECKLI'T REVIEU SHEET ECF - Otn - 8/ APPLICATION Na (s ) ., -Q9.I.S1 PROPONENT : 48/'000"t /,‘Err. t '1QIyy7.. 401241 PROJECT TITLE : N6-2,4-ve- Brief Description of Project : if P/L1esf 7a Ma _,e %c/,4 L()CATION :/'c S•Sidi' deaf/ i'I,d dL.7l4vle Ortl 4 •.at/rewerfJ , M^/,t t SITE AREA : BUILDING-A3 ' y Qerw iTEA „s,, "wi., DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW N[NL MINOR MAJOR MORE INfO 1 ) Topographic changes : I.,/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & Water courses : v D ) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) ' Land Use ; north: east : south : vest : Land use conflicts : Viev obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Nuukber of Dvcl 1 inw 13 ) Trip ends ( Ur ) : traffic i,r;pact :.; : 14 ) Public aervic F_ i ' ) Energy 1/ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Fi c•ammenda . ion :i , DOS More Information ievieved by : if 1 i .1e : LirlutY Lr ,K&2 0 J ,e 1r 6.1_... NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO L-1 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN OAKSDALE AVENUE S.W. & LONGACRES DRIVE S.W. (TAX LOTS 53 & 54) . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE t E.R.C. ) AS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, DOES ®DOES NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIROkiI- MENT. whimJ'M1IY BE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, WILL NOT, SE REQUIRED_, AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 21 , 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CON1 ACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance subject to conditions for the following project: C.A. PARKER (ECF-085-81) Application for approval of preliminary planned unit development comprising 26 buildings, 2-3 stories in height, 344 dwelling units flats and townhouses) , file PPUD-078-81; property located in the 119th block of S.E. Royal Hills Drive. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued final declarations of significance for the following projects: ROBERT SCHUMACHER (ECF-095-81) Application for rezone from R-2 to R-3 to allow future construction of a 9-unit apartment building, file R-086-81; property located in the vicinity of 223 Garden Avenue North. LARRY M. BROWN AND DONALD A. MOODY (ECF-097-81) Application for rezone from G to L-1, file R-091-81; property located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. (Tax Lots 53 and 54) . Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by December 21, 1981. Publ:_shed: December 7, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS Parker, C.A. : ECF-085-81/PPUD-078-81 Schumacher, Robert: ECF-095-81/R-086-81 OLD BUSINESS ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Request for reconsideration of Proposed Declaration of Significance: Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS ECF-097-81 BROWN, LARRY M./MOODY, DONALD A. R-091-81 Application for rezone from G to L-1 ; property located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way between Oaksdale Ave. S.W. and Longacres Dr. S.W. (Tax Lots 53 & 54) HIGHLAND VILLAGE For Review: Responses to Preliminary draft for Highland Village DEIS. k_ i_.11it 1, Environmental Review ILACommittee December 2, 1981 ii 1 17 ' 111 AI- goi41.e i, A., , ,, . k,aim N_____,, hi7":-.-C1:1-- I CI i LAKE i -\ 1_ • WASHINGTON IS 11911.4- g,'..A1102WilAik 1 , i 1 altAtiRilitill Er i 711111.0 i l; i el ell+M. EE& \ I souo , 1 Ili ltratIliata . --:-- I 7 111110, rillerIMEN. \ \ ' I II, softi0111111.16.1 MN irmiel i OM i 16%.111r.. . ..611111211 I \J64a..._ CARNER L 1(A 7117111011111111fIVO_Li II [ i Nu linA — \V- V--- -----1111' 1 111! I r, r —, Brown/Moody, t HIGHLAND VILLAGE t TIf ii 4V41- ite-- , , . , 1 Lir,t _IL, 6 . 9%, 1 - 17,-.1*/ 111 .c glir.--_- . .• no. 1.... ,_,________ 1 iflhictT1TiI EN14nomIIimp......... JiL LAKE s rouncs November 3, 1981 TO: Renton Planning Department RE: Rezone Justification The proponent believes the rezone to be appropriate , timely and in accordance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. Certain actions have occurred in the general area to support the applicant's request. Please note the following: 1. Ordinance 3053 8/79 2. Ordinance 3270 12/78 3. R 344-79 - Pre Cut International 4. R 0 80-80 - Lewis/Mirante Ordinance 3482 11/80 5. Rezone of.Lot 1 of S.P. 138-80 for Emissions Testing Service The Comprehensive Plan indicates M-P ,zoning. However, due to the small size of the property, the owner is requesting L-I with appropriate restrictive covenants if required. Neighboring properties are presently zoned as follows : North - G South - N/A (Grady Way and I-405) East - G and L-I West - R-3 and L-I SIGNE Donal C• Ft t r( l O- Larry M. Brown v 4. zNv INNING DE?‘ CITY OF RENTON RF7OIE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING 1 PPLI CATION NO. l 0 - iP/ EXAMINER 'S ACTION _ PPLICATION FEE// $ //o." APPEAL FILED ECEIPT NO. 7..4/p/ il"„70r/jG CITY COUNCIL ACTION ILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE TEARING DATE iPPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 19 : Name Larry M. Brown/Donald A. Moody Phone 241-1616 Address 11715 N.E. 145th St. Kirkland, WA 98033 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Grady Way between Oakdale Ave. S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. Parcel 1 - 7 ,841 sq. ft. or .18 acres Square footage or acreage of property Parcel 2 - 23 523 sq ft or 54 acres Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Parcel 1-Tax lot 54 situated in the NE 4 of Section 24-23-4 Also known as Tax account #242304-9054-31 Parcel 2 - Tax lots 53 and 54 situated in the NE 4 of Section 24-23-4 Also known as tax account #242 304-9053-32 Existing Zoning (G)? Zoning Requested L-1 3OTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements. ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site No development is planned at present 3. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Conform to all setbacks and landscape covenants as required by City of Renton How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Has not been determined 3. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 vt. ......,,, . ......„ 07--I Ohl O."' i : rif 11 11 ML- 1. _-. 1ME7m11==..," i.;NM-. _Z-1•= ;ME. ..\'' .- 4,'///LP K 1 • r 1 r n o L-. . 11. IACk ON •V C 5 W_ _ ` 1. i s' s s \ ......\\\,\': 1 7/vp---ir— z _ 1 D TV-4-N.,..: (- r LONGACRE3 2ACE ; TRACK 1\ y11r.; 1 :. .. 1' xi 0J, 141,1 pi izl .....A.1ID I:1: 1 1 1 : t in'i i $9 . I cp, I , ojai_4 i,I\ cl` 1. A 1Gl 16 L 1 e 7. Z I,40..ah Z! l 1tT—I t:, ".%\ r ,it 1 s t. , N , , \ii. '7,..- A .•V.,P‘ 4 . t• _ ---... , , `....„, "..;:......„. (- 1,12:,..a. —.7,7,L i I d. III . 1.1 i \ . .. .N 1 fw y v r+7_.,... .. _ ...... 'M„A,tp J:awt,,:' ii,•y6\ '!''F 1,. ---l%ND I'a,: -mow II -- AFFIDAVIT I,Larry M. Brown /Donald A. Moody being duly sworn, declare that fwe am the owner of the property involved- in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscrir and Sworn before me this _I day of Ivrw 194a. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at V/Ar grtf,- 011 .&21 ., 4/ /,Name ©fNotary u l:c)S nature of wner) r 6-v0-S4it _ 11715 N.E. 145th Street CAddre :s) Address) Kirkland WA City) State) 241-1616 ZTelephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept. I-73 Order No. 694746 DESCRIPTION: Portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East , W.M. , in King County , Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of South 153rd Street with the West boundary of C.D. Hillman 's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1 , as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats , on page 74, records of King County; thence running Westerly along the said North margin 350 feet to the true point of beginning of this description ; thence continuing Westerly along said North margin 142 feet ; thence Northerly at right angles to said South 153rd Street 769 feet , more or less , to the Southerly margin of the right of way of the Seattle-Renton Interurban Railway ; thence Northeasterly along said Southerly margin to a line drawn Northerly at right angles to the North margin of said South 153rd Street through the true point of beginning; thence Southerly along said last described line 799 feet , more or less , to the true point of beginning ; BEING KNOWN AS Tracts 11 and 12, Sunset Home Gardens , according to the unrecorded plat thereof) ; EXCEPT portion included within Black River Junction-Renton Road, ALSO KNOWN AS Secondary State Highway No . 1-L; and ALSO EXCEPT portion lying Southerly of the North line of that portion conveyed to State of Washington for Primary State Highway No . 1 by deed recorded under Recording No. 5548715 ; Situate in the County of King , State of Washington. A LA SKA AND WLTA POLICY Form Nn.W&AK 4000.1 (1 PT) SCHEDULE A No. 01-11-694746 Amount ; 15, 000. 00 Date September 30, 1981 at 8 : 30 A.M.Premium $ 102 . 75 1. Insured LARRY M. BROWN and TERRY J . BROWN, husband and wife ,_ and DONALD A. MOODY and NANCY MOODY, husband and wife. 2. Title to the estate, lien or interest insured by this policy is vested in The Named Insured. 3. Estate, lien or interest insured Fee simple estate. 4. Description of the real estate with respect to which this policy is issued See Attached Hereto. TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. Y/ Environmental Checklist No. <. C/ - j 7 7, l PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of- Proponent Larry M. Brown/Donald A. Moody 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 11715 NE 145th Street Kirkland, WA 98033 241-1616 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Rezone 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Rezone of parcel from G to L-1 .72 acre unimproved 2- s - 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical settingof the proposal , as wellPPPYPP as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Property is situated at the southwest end of Grady Way Bridge Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 90 days from date of acceptance List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain : j No 1' . Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None II . E VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YET— MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? YES MAYBE WU— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES RCYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO i f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES FT77 NO Explanation: 4 Small amount of fill required - under 400 cubic yards 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES M YBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or X regionally. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters?YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As related to future development 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , X microflora and aquatic plants)?YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE- NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO X d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Blackberry bush removal . Some cottonwood trees may be removed at a future date. 4- S) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , X insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: as related to future development 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YET— MMAYBE Fir Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: from unimproved to potential commercial or industrial use 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Ilo) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area?Yam- MAYBE 0— Explanation: r „ 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne , rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: as related to future development 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: as related to future development 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclos n part. Proponent: s ed Larry M. Brown Donald name printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 eceipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT f,. LOCATION Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please tale this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. 1 ') a4". 116 24 1:-• 7: 3\ I 7.............„... c A BA iv i515riik0 ..- 1 I i k.............. 1 1‘.' s . I / 1.—.........-.-- . 1 $. W— i lei I I • I G 4:-.• 1.... •....._ t c„ 11) M IR , t..„.._.. v,: v.,.., 1.: M E T R. I- t111 i 1 TA t 4,4 i 1_--_ 4—— — : IIII L— I I D i 5 P 0 5 A I L oci2. 14 - TOL ‘,. .• c- Tgl:;:.::• I .,,"- 1 NOR- Ist- Of‘--- . iteri4P. a., - ......." _,-.':''',---- csr__--------- • . iipple -- 0 1 I R- 3 WA __, ----- L%-;-- v--- . 1 Orli .... .;•. ',_...,: iiill fr° 4 ! N 1 MD I 17.. . , T;,: lituill is oil* .. rilr: I - - l'$: `'•-. 41. 1. 111 .°' ' - 7 • \ \ 7,----- 4- 1,-", , 0 , i . 0. ra . r__________-„. i it 4110_________ P- 4 1 / A>...<''''.::.,. --'--. . miullan..• r : 14, .;,: iii - 7' 7---- i.--- -----.,( 1...-::: WeE4.,.-,—:....-.. .. —,..- 4- 1 4 45 ,,._,.... , F....•_.-•.:______—, 11 6-- r- r-:-. 4..:::•.::.. 10._:-_ :. • R- 4 4 ' . _ . 1\ 44P 1 GE= 6Q00 _ 1 s r -... ... T.,.._-„: 0 .._ --.....- _, . : ..; : . 7- t.:_ 7_ ..:. - ,.-. . _ G.., 4, Gii 1 •\°.,.--,.. 4---, . - - •-:= 1 .±.•-:; . 4--•. 1, • 1 . 1.,\ s- _ A- i • , I_ w I amt ', i, r--- t____, i_ I I 11 i 7 : . 2. S. 1- • I -- ••• 14; 0/ I' - 4' . L : i ;• 1 j ....,,... ' .':' ' ! JR./ HE... PER {.-.----.-- 04.... 114 e•'... 2 , Pli 1.. :. a...... P. A. t o-• dilinimir - — U J I 1: 1 G B- 1 k I 0 I , l 1 5 . 61 '. I1 , II---- i 1 I " I. I LIJLD70 t---:—I L, 1 47)-1 1 E"" 4 NI 1---- H — I m— P EH A N I I G ow i I i I G II I, 1 1 lia...... sunir... eau• redr........- 4 lb I I IN: ENDING OF FILE ff091 8i