HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-097ist:.ih11. CTT1 : • IN!: N NJ c-.
i:ii f ji arJ1. r?.fit
M• 3
FILE TITLE s p a., • 1 '1-
h
ri' n i
it
II!' u AC v
Ax k, W fir.
Fgei1'
i's,is is 1 Y' :
r 15.,.w e e.r. "}i,
f Yart w'r
OF R4,4
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
Z I rnpammoMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
0,
9gTEO SEP,,
10
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 1984
TO: Maxine.Motor, City Clerk
FROM: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Austin Company, Special Permit SP-097-81
The applicant, the Austin Company, has not followed
through with this application fora special permit to fill
the subject site. No action has occurred on the application
since December,. 1981. Therefore, this, application file
is being transmitted.to your-office for placement with
the permanent records.
RJB:JMS/dm
FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s) : SP-097-81
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-104-81
Description of Proposal: Request to fill site
in the amount of
118, 000 cubic yards
to prepare for future
commercial development.
Proponent: Austin Company
Location of Proposal :Southwest corner
of S.W. 19th Street
and East Valley Road.
Lead Agency: Building & Zoning
Department.
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 16, 1981 ,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building
Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David
Clemens, Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, James Hanson, Roger
Blaylock, James Matthew, Steve Munson, Gary Norris.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-104-81 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Steve Munson DATED: December 15 , 1981
2) Applications : SP-097-81
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Department, Traffic
Engineering Division.
Recommendations for a declaration of significance:
Zoning Division, Design Engineering Division, Building
Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does have significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: The
proposal will have a major impact on ( 1 ) topography (2)
water and water courses , (3) plant life, (4) population and
employment, (5) public services, and (6) utilities.
Signatures :
r j.//,,,-, .... ..
p.,,-,
onald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens.
Building Official Policy Development Director
J ,a` /
Richard C. Houghton',
Public Works Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: December 21 , 1981
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: January 4 , 1982
f
Date circulate', ; CommentJs due :
FAVIRMINEXIAL Ce9ECKEIS1 REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 104 _ 81
APPLICATION No (s ) . SP-097-81
PROPONENT : Austin Company
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Request to fill site in the amount of
118 , 000 cubic yards to prepare for future commercial development.
LOCATION : Sni -hwPnt corner of S.W. 19th Street & East Valley Road.
SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :X
2 ) Direct%Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life : X
5 ) Animal lire : X
6 ) Noise : X
7 ) Light & glare : X
w
8 ) Larid Use ; north :
east :
south :
west.
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources; : X
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Po,:ulation/Employment : X
12 ) Number or Due l i i n:;5 :X
13 ) lrip ends ( IHE ) : 4720 @ 25 cubic yards/load
traffic impacts : Major - plus future development
14 ) Public services : I X
15 ) Energy : X
1 ) Utilities : X
17 ) Human health : X
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : X
20 ) Archeolog /history X
COMMENTS :
Flood storage, utilities , current and future traffic
and land use.
Recommendation : DNS1 _ _ DOS X e Inforrat. ur
Reviewed by : litie :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
t• 1
4r i .
y..w Tom`
r
r i'•
4- . L ' '
1- , , - i 'n.
s s; ink
PROPOSED ACTION RFOIIFST Tfl FTLL S TEsIN TALE Q O.I. T F
118,000 CUBIC YARDS TO PRFPARF_FOR FuITURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
SOUTHWEST CORNER QF S .W. 19TH STREET AND EAST VAI I FY ROAD
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTE lik
PEA- SDNS OF A'\ E ' iVIRONIVIENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ,e ' NVIRDNMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. : ''AS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION, ' 1 DOES ODukES NOT HAVE
A SIGNIFICANT ADV RSE IMPACT ON THE ENV,RD %I—
MENT. 1j..
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, )t4 f` ' MLL
WILL T, -_.E REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERIVOONATOON MAY
BE FILED WOTH THE RENTON HEARONG EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M'9 JANUARY 'I, 1982
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARaIWIENT
235-2550
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance for the following projects:
McCARTHY, TERRANCE (ECF-105-81)
Application for conditional use permit to allow use of condominium
unit in R-4 zone for professional office (computer leasing business) ,
file CU-098-81; property located at Unit #204 of Benson Condominiums,
1425 South Puget Drive.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (ECF-106-81)
Application for special permit to fill site in the amount of approxi-
mately 12,000 cubic yards of fill material to build a fire access
roadway, file SP-099-81; property located at 2423 Lind Avenue S.W.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued a final declaration
of significance for the following project:
AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-104-81)
Application for special permit to fill site in the amount of approxi-
mately 118,000 cubic yards of fill material• to prepare for future
commercial development, file SP-097-81; property located at the
southwest corner of S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road.
Further information regarding these actions is available in the Building
and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550.
Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by
January 4, 1982.
Published: December 21, 1981
P
1
WIENVIN.NMEMTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 16 , 1981
G E N D
COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-104-81 AUSTIN COMPANY
SP-097-81 Application for special permit to fill
subject site in the amount of +118 , 000
cubic yards to prepare for future commercial
development; property located at the
southwest corner of S.W. 19th Street
and East Valley Road.
ECF-105-81 McCARTHY, TERRANCE C.
CU-098-81 Application for conditional use premit
to allow use of a condominium unit, located
in a R-4 zone, as a professional office;
property located at 1425 Puget Drive
S.E. , Suite 204 .
ECF-106-81 MOBILE OIL CORPORATION
SP-099-81 Application for special permit to fill
site in the amount of +12 , 000 cubic yards
in building a roadway 'for fire access
and protection; property located in the
vicinity of 2423 Lind Avenue S.W.
ECF-108-81 LINCOLN PROPERTY
R-100-81 Application for rezone from P-1 and "G"
to R-3 for future multiple family development ,
of 186units; property located on the
east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. ,
south of N. 24th Street.
CANDLEWOOD RIDGE
Proposal for a planned unit development
for 406 multiple-family dwellings; property
located north of S.E. Petrovitsky Road
and between 148th Avenue S.E. and 152nd
Avenue S. E. (CF/CHG Associates Number
Three) .
0
A la \
v,A viiii
111Wrirkt, ' 1
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1,
In\
DECEMBER 1 6 , 1 9 8 1 I 1 ...--
la
L
i'\
LAKE . '' AitN- LINCOLN PROPERTY0,,-,
t ,i,.... . ..,,
E\01%1\•%N, \X'ASHINGTON ‘ \
r>"
i
1 4 •EIA,..
i,i i , _Mill/ --MM.-,. 1" , .." • In --i :
i_._
r_.
00C.G
hrl 1.....„....._
T--
d 1 -',., -1 ' 'T 1' '‘ lill11111.fikla '
1 • H I I '
e.• 'rn I
ml
in trik-'-'7 ___ .
1
1---- 'H (V•N ,\ 7,
ek'
s----------,.„ • mill= ,
T___: -'-
t-1-)-717, -,
7_,,,.;_z_,
11' '
4
1-
irj\
4 ---, _ .
i 10.., ..,,, •,....,_____,,___, 2 _.. 1-_:;.:-_-,__ - x--\_,.-- - #• ••• t •
C.
zii i
r. _ ...),
fr_r-I ,,,, AUSTIN COMPANY 41c.,, nii 4., 2) „,..li• - -----mmL--- * fiti -r II 4 McCARTHY ,,L-__.----"---,---,,,,
11A,----z- N----1--- -1-143 - - '-', MOBILE OIL CORPORATION
1I 4. .. . 1ri .
1%
i 1 I
IS';1i
1 i
3 ill
i
1 f \•,_\H!I.j*i
1.-j— 1
i 1
zjlT 11I
1 t 11 1. pr
1
u.
I 1 _1I
CA',
NDLEWOODI
RIDGE
L _
HLi-__.\-_
r 1 r I IF----\"- • 1.__-,
I
r____,1 Hil. .
1 .1H';':, LAKE
I1,-] YOUNGSr-1
4.SW. PIT" vrt o-
r')S)li‘'Th\----
I1
11 7,.
or w G2Jn
E , I
I L_ : .,,,T
DD..:
I
1
11
C
dl
44 F 1(
I
5
11
yt?ii eI.
e
el
3
i.) 1
4J/ l \
is ia
1
Nap
5\V. 2.1'T.e:E..T
e12C!
p)Lect ro
nil pi$.,,r4 dig rd-7V.^,, r re.,"":,
Q - AUSTIN :•••
I'.•o• _._SITE PLAN B FILL SECTIONS
COMPAI lY =i i y Y OFFIG 6 INQSJ jHIL LPAR6-- =C Q.,.o R A
RENTON, VASH.oeawew•ewe.xena•ear ocwa ---- ••°•,
ia. . ,,,a,, .•,•',.
r,..., ;r• v•skP--:-----W"'t--
i10-143:02V--_.v5•10-1.3 -----
r x.,
otee'''.- - 1:Z,„,
e.
i , a
4...47,..v-• -
1""'"3/4'regiais VP.1...ITAN.Pft.: ...4.114 .4o .7.410..000.24427:t ``
1
11
2
tt.--•-•., •...,.•
COI I 'L.' I'11I
I_ - -
1te.t,n,Czts! f j.1 I n I 1
A...TOMO...N.2 • I1IL11
l..e2r;
i iw
i i - -- i l_'-,. • i
rMCT
f i f--
I I f MI of Oloeb 5.C.o.•111•••••torIlnoon GortIone hedleler
to t.1.City oz Marti..01•Ialon No 1,•ccoral,to th•1 II 1 TIst tecoldott In 101,...•1,04 Mote.wog.74 In III,Count
4.
7":..:14:o...,:loc1:
n.
l.,4.„.2.0„.,..
gne.
n,,t..,
n..:
er.
c.zel.
o. .
7
II FCC. 1 ' .
t 0 oat,of ot To 1 to 0.•City or soot.* oLvioion oo 1.0000s0o1 to thn•CO...•••to•vive 1
la
Z 41
0 '* I.21..EVATON 04.11.0•0.40210 00 CITV OF RIZAITCOL 0 Mt C
0.40,1144.4•2•••MIL U2V21_•C.00 FT WOOS,01 42 ItaC001 CC
It.CONT.J0 INTICRVA4_CY1021101, NEW LOFT
w 1 0.C1_2014 21TE OF/0.1-2022•.COUCH AnICKT•04214 01201,111.1CTI31-= I 41 I THAT NUT 0.4114•1P4 PILL 0•214191,0•43.
t CC I 9.•11.4.4.21-1-MI PLAC20 0 COMPACTE0 TO 21-2•••,101•5 St
il1 i
I 4 ,
0.WrOw0SaCiL0 Alt Artria9 wood C00.041./LT.044 OF•41•01•40.
I> ri 2.0 1_1_WORK 110.1•1.1.004.0.1-V VAT.C/TV OF•204TONi
11.190.02.440 2100144•44C2 CHAPTER 25_Fn_t_4.11•T24414,14.4,
OPAVZ NO 440412 Too ohl4 1.0440411•Lo0.41 T.OF 0.401.44.0
1 41 ,,‘
zuoIrriatacffs I.140 5.1.1.-1.N.WE NO NOCIt OM olimn_an van.,
l 0010 ACRE 5
la
140•11210.4.1_WM.••ItAnt1.0.444 00.4CM•t00 0•12•TEtri To•ot i
Lt.IounlILIC ROODUCnVID•0..4.224.1T TO•4•0...00,0•4,0•
Il aCI
01.10•1105.
SW 19 Ih ST TO 0412 SIT.ON•tt...Olt 4.4.404TOIFOLO VI•CL.2.4.4•110 Ct.,.
T MAC 1—II
CFT -s°
I
L1 C111 v
W
6.,;, • ..tt„,I of
Oil 15(101ITT 1142/41101.4 4...-. 140104.11T•caseat
1 mum, . . •' a
Ea2ij _
OW)---Ca..suag carrom
gy-.--140.1 OMR CONICul
1, ,':?3;41*,,'., . I ,
s vs ?le-.T
i
1,1
i 1
t''sl,s,
1.4,01 1102•42)
4
GULFOtt NYCOMPA 11 lk.
004•047, 1 \4v. 1 .t
a
5I4C T1044 1-042
I \
g ,0 --
owns non
tr2ccN ems_roslinancr._ AL__Ial volt VICINITY PLAN 79
OITHE AUSTIN - -•-_
0 _ ........ VAJJ-EY OFFICE_19 C401.13TRIAJ_ PAM ..._C.
COMPANY -,g.A,
1°Onl_ P•
001 .ii is cornout2r ice Alin inc.
Vy
1425 pugot drive s.2. s'_:t r^' r2, i` r•. u ;D5 '599
rncrroo November
Mr. Roger Blaylock
Associate Planner
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Road South
Renton , WA 98055
Dear Roger :
Enclosed are two copies of the completed Application for SpecialPermit , two copies of the Affidavit of Ownership and two copiesoftheEnvironmentalChecklistForm.
We have not encluded a site plan , since all of the building plans.for the Benson Condominium are currently on file at the City ofRenton , and no physical changes are planned.
Our request for a conditional use permit , is under the provisionsoftheCityofRentonzoningordinances (4- 7094 ) wherein premiseszonedforresidentialusemaybeusedforprofessionalofficesparagraphA3 (a) ) .
The professional office will be occupied by Pacific ComputerLeasing , Inc . (PCL) of which I am the President , and sole shareholder.PCL , as the name implies , arranges financing foruY medium and largeIB -: computer systems in the northwest . These financial servicesrequire (1 ) marketing , which is my responsibility and which takesplaceoutsideoftheunit , and (2) administration which is donebytheonlyotheremployeeattheunie .
Our offer to purchase the unit from its previous owner was madesubjecttoMeBensonBoardofDirectrsapprovingasapro:=essiona1 office , which ; given prior to ,-he sale .((letter attached)
The unit appears to meet the commercial code in terms of its fireseparationbarriersandloadingrequirements . The Fire Marshallforseesnoproblemswithourutilization.
Please call if you have any questions .
Ve y tr ly yours ,
T.C .
i ,
McCarthy
President
cc : George Akers
Montgomery , Purdue , Blankinship & Austin
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING '
May 12, 1981
Mr. Terrance C. McCarthy
c/o Mr. Dave Ballard
The Benson Sales Office
1425 S. Puget Dr. , Unit #I401
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Mr. McCarthy:
As a condition of your closing, you have requested permission• from The
Benson Condominium Board of Directors to establish an office within
condominium Unit #1204 in The Benson condominium project. Given the
facts in your case, we therefore grant permission for you to establish
an office within your unit as long as the following conditions are ob-
served:
1. No signage is to be displayed which is, visible from the
outside of the unit.
2. Any walk-in traffic which may be associated with the
office is to be discouraged. Such traffic, if there
is any, shall be restricted to no more than normal
traffic from invited guests and acquaintances.
3. Noise levels associated with the proposed office
shall not create a threat to the quiet enjoyment of
the other residents in the project.
4. Any 'special, electrical or other equipment needed
shall not constitute an immediate or continual
hazard to other residents and shall be inspected
by management prior to operation and from time
to time as requested by the Board of Directors.
5. Such office shall be in compliance with local
zoning ordinances.
Please sign below and return the original to Ralph D. Brinton & Associates,
Inc. , c/o Richard P. Dunn, 460 South Tenth East, Suite 300, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84102.
Signed:
BENSON CONDOMINIUM BOARD OF DIRECTORS
g
Date By:
ire or (In behalf of enson
oar of Directors)
ACKNOWL GED:
i By lli Cd
2 0, lge
6.Z..Y. ltL
CIVIL ENGINEERS ° SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
December 7, 1981
DEI PROJECT NO. 80010
Lincoln' Property Company
11400 S.E. Sixth Street
Suite 220
Bellevue, WA 98004
Attention: Scott Springer
Ref: Lakeside Apartment Project, Renton
Dear Mr. Springer:
At yourrequest we have researched the availability of utilities (water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer) to the referenced site. A complete
discussion of the alternatives available to provide the site with ade-
quate fire flows is contained in the. report. of 20 April 1981 by RH2
Engineering. In essence, the report states that the city' s system can be
upgraded and extended to the site through one of several routes and by
one of two different funding mechanisms. Sufficient water supply is
therefore available to the site.
Sanitary sewers are also available to the site by one of two alternatives.
An existing 8" line deadends at the northwest corner of the property on the
east margin of Lake Washington Blvd. The depth of the line limits the
potential service area to the south. Those portions which cannot be
served by the existing 8" line can be served by a tap into the METRO trunk
which ties on the west side of the Lake Washington Blvd.
There are now several storm sewer culverts under Lake Washington Blvd.
which drain the site and adjoining lands. Studies done for the park show
these structures to be more than ,adequate to carry the anticipated developed
flows. Whether these culverts will qualify as "adequate downstream courses"
so as to eliminate the need for retention on the developed sites will
depend to a certain extent on the development plans, but the possibility is
certainly there.
In conclusion, there would seem to be no insurmountable problem with providing
utilities to this site. Some extension and upgrading of existing facilities
will be necessary, but this is neither unusual , nor are the improvements
required so extensive that they could not be funded and installed by the
developer.
Very/truly yours,
i
Bruce J. Dodd• P.
BJD/jk
1550-130TH AVE.N.E.,BELLE VUE.WA 98005 • 12O6)685-7877 OR 454-3743
vr" ,r F=
a 1774..
April 20, 1981
S1061 .0
RECEIVED
APR 2 3 1981
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC.
515 116th Avenue N.E. Suite 158 DODDS ENGINEER P2C
Bellevue, WA 98004
JOB NO. 8/D )
Attention: Mr. Scott Springer, J.D.
Subject: Water system improvement alternatives
for the proposed Lakeside development
Dear Mr. Springer:
This letter surrnarizes water system improvement alternatives for providing
various levels of water supply capability for fighting a fire (fire flow)
at the proposed Lakeside development in the City of Renton. Fire flow
levels of 2700, 3500 and 4200 gallons per minute (gpm) while maintaining
20 pounds per square inch pressure residual , in accordance with Insurance
Services Office Criteria, have been considered at the highest development
elevation of 100 feet.
The attached map illustrates four alternatives for obtaining the fire flow
levels mentioned. Alternative 1 and 2 each contain approximately 1 ,900
lineal feet of pipe and will require a pressure reducing station. These
two alternatives can provide fire flows of 3500 or 4200 gpm by providing
12 or 16 inch diameter pipe. Alternative 3, a substantially longer length
at 3700 feet, consists of two sections of pipeline improvements and can
provide a maximum of 3500 gpm. Alternative 4, which can provide 2700 gpm,
consists of modifying the pipeline improvements plannned by the City Park
Dept. for Gene Conlon Park. The alignment would be adjusted up to Lake
Washington Boulevard instead of through the park and the diameter increased
to 12 inches from 8 inches . This alternative, although more expensive than
Alternatives 1 and 2, could obtain participation by other property owners
and the City and we anticipate that the participation would make this the
least expensive alternative.
The estimated cost for each alternative is summarized in the following
table:
300 - 120th Avenue N E Suite 219. Bel;evue. Wa. 93005 (206) 451-05E5
e. •„ Lincoln Property Co ny N.C. , Inc.
April 20, 1981
Page 2
Current
Alternative Lsti,:.ated Cost
1 or 2 3500 gpm
1900 lineal feet of 12" diameter
pipe and a pressure reducing station 80,600
1A or 2A 4200 gpm
Same as 1 and 2 except 16" diameter
pipe 95,800
3 3500 gpm
3720 lineal feet of 12" diameter pipe
and a pressure reducing station 132,400
4 2700 gpm
Realignment and size increase to 12" (Cost dependent
pipe for 4250 lineal feet and one upon partici-
crossing pation)
Our recommendation is Alternative 2 or 2A depending on the actual fire flow
required. If the fire flow requirement can be reduced to 2700 gpm, then
Alternative 4 should be considered in more detail prior to making a deci-
sion. (Degree of others ' participation should be established).
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you desire additional
information. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance in your
planning efforts.
Sincerely,
Richard H. Harbert, P.E.
RHH:jw
cc Bruce Dodds, Dodds Engineers
RECEIVED
APR 2 3 1981
DODDS ENGINEERS, INC.
JOB NO.
7.
5 I
iirri'l,Tien.r Fri-i-ri-t-rt-crir !Till r i I"1-1 I:I1 . , -: -,,. '• .,,- - ,. , 1:i ,0.1:LI.1 Li 2..
iilli.4.,I.Pl'-'d 1 I I LI I I [I LI. [ I LLL LLII I 111i..., - • .- - - - - - - - -
40 41 4 a .\ /
cs.„
2-
91,._. _______________1.1.1-1-1-ririr 11 irrirri I 1 ri*N1 mi,..,,...-. -,
i
t „:,,.. co„,-,_ -,
14.4.,[4., t.1 uu tc LI 1117111T( 1 .1-1-1 I I-111
2 r$ ,..t- - - — - pC .
43\ 44 45 II LIIOOL
i
s?'
1•' 51 .
I ;
q; II I 1 I i I I I I Iii
L\ • , \\-'---,- ., :, - - - __i 1 ,
s,'6'\ --
PI i A FY I i,f .:•..„' :".:;:' f-1 Q.,/ /
i::F.::'I ' "!•!--' . ; !. !;•,••' •
1
Z -
zI
3:1i. 4
i?,,,S-----------Q.b\r;37:,--._ Lip) 7.i .1 0 1 c
s.\ , ...., .‘ ,:,,., \/..,,,/••$,
i,...._____, a i ---....:___-
h ' a j- I ,0 j.. ./
i•
IA 5-• q
2' t !3 1 '2
295 20Z ei4
t" I., Z
V\ 'f•\
0 • i i i
i il L
t I
4 Y1\N 137 333 ,
s-'_-,
14 .r.,, i 2'.)4 2b3 2 i3 e,,-e
L . , --' ,....#
1 \&\\ ..,
t 11
4.,,,) z„, 338 \... :..::\ ''1111.',1 ?'°
A3,, : ,-, il
1 :.:,
1
I I .
I i I t._
it:\fk, -•,"! -------:C...
3 `..•:•::
s
I
c,•
1 1 A : •
1.(i ))' ' \\\ t '-f: s I il339. . • 11 I
II I ," /i. .-
Pi '/' \ \ ,A i.
i r I or N i'• 7, :'..'6' '11N/...;'"..41 I-41 '-n•r'''''''';''''"; 1 II I --— '''I
2C.: 'et••1 :' ' 2(...3 ,i I
i 11)i Nit 'e;iftiA:4 7 •
i
0.4rA;Z 1 Pti NV-4.'gi•ttl .,1 --7
V \\ .W.:"..4rttep-40-r% • IIuta,:eAN.04-yttrAtglik
IcS* ---'---------- 1'rd:kt*''''.41461"4.1f4544''114';'-'''
I \q/71__4\ \ ',1' .. ....1.1%1 ‘' ‘'
4-
k i (
Nr.
i
1 • T'iVr":11''';- •
1:..L.1 1 ---
11 1 1 -•_L
t'',1,1-•-,..2P• .344 I,
f'.
6_.'_._
1 ' • 1 i','.I I r '.. \4-; 1,..,-;.--: /
0 \ '--
1
I i .
1 - ....7. i :• '''
1 I•/::•%,t1, \\ -\ '4 sse /
1 I 29 t 223 1/-11., ) 1,1 --s ‘,
13 \A \ i \\___ •K: ,i 5
I. ;
c._?. :, __
I/ 1 fl.
I '' .... • • lC -7. -Ni (
1. -, \
3- L-. i i ---,., • -
k, : .,(
1
eqi zr..c. tr:• `, —
I [
A• ci“;\ 1,,‘
1' .,, 1 ! ' I ' '' -. 5. ,''..: -'
I '
K. .04 /2) i:
Z90 1 , , • .0 $
5 ..., .
1 1 t 3
I 1
2 '' -.:1-- - ; -:- .,. A - •:II. .- i
i ' =-=--...— • '
r • • . • ;!.. '._ i
7 '; -- "." ', - "t , •
i' jl 11171(. 11 ei .
Ali\S/1. •••:. fldr.''''I;I ,1
4
r'•: T1 .
s.,
ti U ----.-1
Richard Carothers Associates
December 4, 1981
REZONE APPLICATION COVER LETTER
APPLICANT: Anna Phinney, Bruce Larson et. all , Estate of M.W. Lotto and Marjorie
L. Lotto
The Owners of the property described in the accompanying documents hereby apply for
a rezone of the property to an R-3 classification. The property is located east of
Lake Washington Boulevard, across the street from the Gene Coulon Park extension
presently under construction. The site is currently in operation as a golf drivingrangeonaleasebasis .
In the comprehensive plan the property is designated as R-4 for high densitymulti-family use. This classification would allow in excess of fifty units per
acre on the site which contains approximately ten acres, thus permitting in the
vicinity of 500 dwelling units at maximum site development. The owners are,
however, applying for R-3 zoning with a stipulation that not more than 186 units
will be constructed on the site. This R• 3 application is being sought, in part, to
expedite the environmental review and rezone process. Previous discussions with
the City of Renton Planning Department have indicated that an R-3 rezone would
likely fall below the threshold otherwise necessitating th? preparation of an
environmental impact statement occasioned by project size.
The rezone to R-3 and subsequent development of multi-family housing on the pro-
perty is appropriate. It is consistent with both the plans and policies of the
City of Renton formulated in the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan foresees this pro-
perty and adjacent sites along Lake Washington as developing into an affordable
multi-family residential community. Such development is particularly important due
to its close proximity to the central city core. Renton is experiencing overall
rapid growth, much of which is in the outlying areas . Providing housing in or near
the city core is recognized as an important priority for the near future, in Renton
as well as many other cities.
Interstate 405 provides the major traffic linkage of Renton to other parts of the
greater Seattle area. As designed currently and for the foreseeable future, access
to the Interstate is substantially easier from the project area than it is for many
areas east of I-405. The rapid growth of residential areas in eastern Renton has
created near saturation of major arterial feeders to the Interstate. Current and
projected lgvels of traffic support the desirability of shifting additional growth
to the west".
The subject property is particularly well suited for development as a residential
project of the type proposed. It is situated on a terrace, well above Lake Wash-
ington, providing excellent views to the west while reducing its physical and
visual impact on the lake and shoreline. The major portion of the site is nestled
below steep slopes screening the development from Interstate 405. These slopes
provide excellent buffering between the proposed development and neighboring uses
Eight Fourteen East Pike Street, Seattle, Washington 98122 Telephone (206) 324-5500OfficesSe'aItIe VVashngir.ri r fi(r,r• Idahr, {I ,,,10: VIrrpruq
Rezone Application
December 4, 1981
Page 2
to the northeast and southeast. These slopes would, additionally, continue to act
as a defacto addition to the greenbelt prevelant in the area.
The site has easy access to nearby recreational facilities and the newly developingGeneCoulonParkandtheLakeWashingtonwaterfrontareas . This amenity is partic-
ularly valuable to residents of multi-family developments who generally have
limited access to outdoor spaces of their own.
The proposed rezone and subsequent development is timely. The City of Renton is
undergoing steady and continued growth as the focal point of the south Lake Wash-
ington area. Rental vacancies are relatively low, particularly when compared with
the neighboring areas of Kent, Auburn and Federal Way.
As previously discussed, traffic patterns would suggest a preference toward
concentrating near term growth in areas of continued good access to downtown Renton
and I-405. With the ever increasing need for sensitivity in the area of energy
conservation, particularly regarding gasoline use, encouraging housing that is
close to major employment and retail areas is a worthwhile priority. The proposed
project suits this end particularly well .
Although in some cases access to utilities is difficult, there is no question that
all the necessary utilities are available to serve the subject property, and that
sufficient reserve capacity exists in order to accommodate a project of the size
proposed.
Copies of a traffic study and soils report are attached to this application.
Neither the traffic study or the soils report indicate any significant develop-
mental problems with respect to the project itself or with respect to its impact
upon Lake Washington Boulevard and the surrounding community. .
1
Roger Blalock, Department. of Planning, City of Renton, Meeting of April 29,1981 .
2
Roger Blalock, Department of Planning, City of Renton, Telephone
communication of May 14, 1981 .
3
Don Monihan, Department of Public Works, City of Renton, Telephone
communication of May 14, 1981 .
Richard Carothers Associates
r
1 `6
01, . r l w q
L . P s
O 1 , 1 I• : Y ! • I4El •, -
a 11, sr
011017,•.. A000000,„rrf:,,./
k"'
4.
ail, ., .t
1 •.
0:151 '''''. . : .• , c,,,,13 :r ,; s:"i•' l'. ett? . •
r ,f•{ / r / : r Ci r•L•y i..• • 4b • • is t a j; - tiJ
00
q . -..• .-..
i*
6:
1.10. ---". ':---i. It % '
1. . .
t i.• n-fit it //`
3 11 ..
r
7}4 r' • ' y r•1 / 1 t K9 y H
aI_
r•_' h r: {:a. ' 'ln/' ..3t4.,r ..
I - '
s.•,! . ottstrov-TII11 Ia<
4t L
4ar = ddd.•—
ye • - • * : - - •d•N ii .{ s •
V
C YG7f/F:li i® a.,
v
i,
O F t 1 P N 3 • 0®L
V
Y :• yam
c
i.30 l' L. R n
Y
0' • I.
ii, 0 z.i•ii 1,-tic • i i j_____,-----------
1 .
i t; i ar7c,„) 1,./ a 4„ , „.: or r i • •
0-, N,„ I rt;..-% ...kt /,CD
z A 1.3- ' CD). A i ld '- ‘:r..l E
6 '. / c,,..3 c., )
ts '' I ‘h' ..\:
I
E
5) "
1 71 f ff.- A
C.14f 1 0
r M ; aAilo7P7lrr7T7r. i'.1 P-7 6L1 .• 1/
o r fU 1
1 AA
p.
r
r .ry•
4-pa. ''•• P. °
W
y
e
M l \ fir• I
1.16
sJ:j
Accl ! 7r ,tJB :;;r0 9No•NV 7YyJ• L I
1 l••••
J O•A•'N' W
11 I+.f. :` ••I KM AJ erl
H4GHWA _ r 88
HWY 1J0 2 A) f\ RENTOAF•TO KEktdYDQLE o I a
FLY SE.0 ST• E
5;,• lN2• 04IG1I AV&. • NeAPPROV[q APRIL IR.1666
7 ..__rr••rr v.y - -
E J , srm.F a oz s yt, •.; ' .1p ie „,l/.py,•e/..«.,,,7f c„
w
a.). sl` ,serhu. •
mry.a
t.
S 1 I ,.Plr.• O I•.a. aI '
dru,...,
1,4,1j1:
j."
i.',,
4
t.,'s.-
r,
1:
i_,A,.. ,..,•
W:
j..
rk:'
li.
2'.,
6I .,4iibi 11 •. ... o"
i:
i.klY
IL ey
OAO /e a4
L1L. l:=-
L l•=44.
1,(
AI(lifi
46 .
l., p OK 0041
i..."(T‘.
i 133 .3 b i 4 — 1
q
4s0 1 1.. k. ci•.- -i 1 o r t• r
OF RP,
THE CITY OF 1RENTON5gre5) °
i era i` - ;` o
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 235-2552
O F MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 980559,
0 co•
P December 11, 19819itEDSEPTE
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
Mr. Ron McConnell, Acting Manager
Building and Land Development Division
450 King County Administration Building
Seattle, Washington 98104
RE: CANDLEWOOD RIDGE - A POD
406 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS
Dear Mr. McConnell:
The City of Renton has just received the "SEPA Register" and noted that a proposeddeclarationofNON-significance has been issued for the above project. Having notreceivedanyotherreferralbyKingCounty, we are very concerned about the implica-tions of this decision.
Due to the short notice, the City's Environmental Review Committee has not had theopportunitytoconsiderthisproposal. However, in light of past actions in thisvicinity (Carriagewood and Shadowood) , this department must strongly recommend anenvironmentalimpactstatementtoconsiderthefollowingpotentiallyadverseeffects :
1. Traffic and associated impacts (noice and air quality)2. Public services, particularly police and fire3. Project scale
4. Impacts upon the site
5. Storm drainage
6. Ut,.lities, particularly sewers and water7. Recreation
We believe that the items above have "more than a moderate" effect upon the environ-ment,
and thus the project requires evaluation and full public disclosure through anEIS.
This matter is set for Environmental Review Committee review on December 16,at which time a formal City position will be formulated.
Very/ Duly you :
6
David R. Clemens
Policy Development Director
DRC:wr
cc: Mayor
Council
Environmental Review Committee
mte
w ef qr gvq4 p nit 9
Page 2 - Week of Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 1981 ea
nvinonm.;..'niCf al A-95•
O'
Date End ef'i)CH f Lead Agency PropIIosalIssuedReview.OS t
t*11 "''
F `
OlgcY s9('. PROPOSED DECLARATIONS o///)--
0 F N 0 N S I C N I F I C A N C E(2)Act I Whatcom County 146-unit renideotial condominium, 2/1/81 12'i7'elY1-•`'ie•`**
directly east and south of intersection
Published weekly in accordance with WAC 197-10-831. Listings for publican.. of Tyee Dr. and APA Rd. (point Roberta
in thin Register should be sent to the Department of Ecology, Ecviron- -ta'. Yacht Basin Realty, Inc.)
Review Section, Mail Stop Pc-11, Olympia, WA 9850.. Phone: (20t) J,,'i_!.i_; 1 Wh.z cons County Expansion of a nonconforming use by 12/1181 2"1?1B:
addition of 24x56 ft. to an existing
building used fur commercial purposes
in an Agricultural zoned area (valleyDoc:•nents Received During Week of Nov. 30-Dec. 4, :981
Pltasbing I Electric)
A-95• Da•e ;;na ;fi,
3 Port of Skagit Co. La Conner Marina Master Plan 11/23'El
uf - Le+e Agenc-, Proposal Iss,',.: R_evi,.: 5 Ring County Two 60t100-ft. warehouse buildings and 11/24!81
fair underground fuel storage tanks,
DRAFT E I Ss 11525..E. Hargioal_.Way S. (Harbor Island
Investments)
5 King County Dry Boat Storage Facility, 7 one-at Fi,-v 1:14/81 1'9/92 5 ng County Candlewood Ridge, a pl..Aned unit 11/25!8: 12 15'a'buildings with a capacity fcr 382 boats,
development for 406 multiple-familyanoffice, caretaker's sccondattor.s, ca
dwellings, north of SE Pstrovitsky Rd.
sboatliftsandparking, Kenmore Commu'tity, and between 148th Ave. SE and 1521,Ave.east of 68th Ave. NE and south of NE SE'(It-both..extended).--(GF¢CHC'Fnaociates175thSt. at 7007 NE 175th S_. (Plyv:.od Nxaeber Three)
Supply Inc.), 5 King County Kingsgrove, a subdivision of 37.07 11/25/81 12116f!1SCityofBellevueEvergreenHighlandsSubareaPlan, 12/1/81 1!5/822 acres into 121 lots, west of Kit Cor-
adoption of a land use and annexation ner Rd. S. between S. 376th St. and S.
plan for t'a Evergreen Highlands Sub- 390th St. (if both extended) (Daon Corp.)eras 5 King County Panther Lake North, • planned unit 11/25/81 lb2,16'e'9 D.S. Army Corps Wynoochee Hydropower/Fish Hatchery, 12/3/8! 1/31/82 development for 77 townhouses and
of Engineers 10.2-megawatt hydropower addition to apartments, north of SE 200th St. on NWWynoocheeDananda396,000-pound side of Panther Lake, 650 ft. east ofhatcheryforanadromnusfish, 35 mi. 10Bth Ave. SE (SR 515) (Charles
north of Montesano in Crays Harbor Henderson Co., Inc.)
County 5 King County Terra Cleo, a subdivision of 14.63 • 11/25/81 12/16/B122PendOreilleCountySullivanCreekE,droelectric Project, 12/1/81 1/4/82 acres into 58 lots, vest side of 124thP.C.D. No. I and construct a new dam near the con- Ave. SE, between SE 203d and 205th Ste.
BA State Dept. of fluent' of Sullivan and Outlet Creeks if both extended) (Benitz Zinc and
Ecology for generation of 18 mg, near Town of Mildred Carmichael)
rietaline Falls 5 King County Construct a 38.5-ft. high dish antenna 12/3/81 12/23'g:
and an equipment building, 1550 ft.FINAL E I sr+
vest of losaquoh Hobart Rd. SE, vest of
the BPA caeevsnt and south of SE Illth5Cato ` Poulabo Liberty Bay Marina, installation of a 17/81 St. (Western Tele-Comxmrnicattons, Inc.)marine complex to include both land-
5 King County Earth Station Antenna System, 37.5-ft. 12/3/91 12123,based and floating structures end
high microwave antenna,
y
activities, 250 ft. NW of junction of R support
3d Ave. with 6th St. (Earl L. Millet) structure and ir.terconnectl g cabling
occupying 400 eq. ft., 1000 ft. east of10ThurstonCountyReplatofCapitolCityEstatesto11/25/81
91st Ave. SW, 500 ft. north of SW 159thcreate7lots, 5 for single-family
St. (Fisher Broadcasting, Iattachedtownhouee-style units and 2 g' Inc.)
for commercial lots, south of Yelm Hwy.
and east of Rainier Rd. (Lyle Anderson/
Associates) 2) Only proposed declarations of nonsignificance for proposal. where the Department24CityofSpokaneNorthRiverbankUrbanDesignPlan,12;2/81 of Ecology is en agency with juriadiction are required to be transmitted to the
guidelines for public and private Department of Ecology. Environmental assessments (CAs) received from a Federal
action and incentives for development agency are also Bated.
1) These dater+ are supplied by the lead agency. Requests for Information or
autaittal of comments should be directed to the lead agency.
The SEPA Guidelines provide for a 35-day review of draft Elsa and a IS-day
review of proposed declarations of nonsignificance. This time period may
be extended by the lead agency.
These cambers refer to the.ouaber of the A-95 Clearinghouse within whose
jurisdiction the project lira.
iCITYOFRENTON
fl rs• d
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PLKnIT i,„,1 13
0
mO\9 30 19B1
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
File No . SP- D9Q-$',1 Date Rec' d.114443D - 8/
111 GApplicationFee $Receipt No .
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO' COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name The Austin Company Phone (206) 226-8800
Address 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055
2. Property location Southwest of S.W. 19th Street midway hetwePn
East Valley Road and Lind Ave. S.W.
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) All of
Blocks 5 and 6 , C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the
City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the Plat recorded
in Volume 17, Page 74 in King County, Washington.
4 . 'Number of acres or square feet 9. 9 Ac Present Zoning G
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? - Preparation for
possible future development.F pc.z2 Cy ft
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)'
E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and
Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in
Section 4-2307.5 in addition to the above.
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION:
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
1-77
fNennrDN
n _ 6 1
1
I :/
we NroN
e J7 ....,
O t co.
co
E
NE
Q pipplIpP" .------------------- cOMR
NOLMEITjTEtSTI*1
1 Peu KQ(S1RTf1Y
I All of Kook A.
b So.
Plllfq•a 4rl lepton Gardens Addition
to N•City of Seattle.DlYlalon .1.according to the
I I YPietaetingtontiod In W1•A•17 of Plata.Ppe en In King County. .I I
I \\\\
I I_ IO
tit::LLea!!.C.O.•1t .a•a tarlingfgv CeaSu•Mditl
d CO-OPERATIVE r.00rdedfl n tblurtl).page lnlRlog Conti fuDingNOPlat
lli
O O I Q N ptan
I.ELEVATION
O- O O
N.A. Z DATUM.eIEANI SEA LEVETUM L.DOO PT,MIMS
ON CITY )ON•K.C.
7 o 4 YAMS CONfOUR MrO1 Y•:Oflfi.lA PT. NEW IOIT.
O 0 = RK4NTI,LL
0 W UCLZ*RSrcf OFALLTREES.SRUSN ANDOTNOI Ofl TRllcnONS
Q Z I J TIMT MAY IMPAIR PTLLOPCRATONS.
O t I J I Q S-FlHYCROSEUD ALL NEb UPON COMPLETION OI GRDN NOWN_
G.ALL WORK ENALLCCMPLY WITN CITY OFRENTONIIIV)GRADING MOREOINANCE.CN
AMOUNTS• MINOR OP ORGANICQSUSSTANCCSANDSHALLNAVENOROCKORSIMILAR IRREDUCIBLE
LONOACRES • W MATERIAL WRN A MAKIMUN DIMENSION GREATER THAN S WCNES.
RACE 1 L--T.ALL PUBLIC ROADWAYS ADJACENT Tb ANO PROVIDING ACCESS
TRACK r W.19M.ST.
1 N
CONDITION.TOWNS SITE SHALL SIC MAINTAINED W A CLEAN ANO CLEAR
LST:t. y
L____I of >;-:-F .<':. •.' of J,;.
f @'Q
I/
CI TT
r,Y>i RI030T
COyDELBENNETTRENTONGIP(;T ;'d; ` .'1, RKIRATT TpDq
VACANT) W 1^-.h
I.'.•+.*`+. Y4 nN...n sees COMMA
i al ,,vv {}yK.ry3 '',-t MN taunt ODOOaI
lor t Y ty `-
I het? F +
SW,21e ST. •
1\\\
IIlCANTI I UNIT)
I GULF
1 K
L
wM{WrIY
TL._O
IMCMITI
A11
If
SECTION LINE
aW OM MKR. t®-uael w osta_eE uvr ` --auk. `
Q THE AUST IN .
t.0 r.zoo' RA _YICINITY_PLAN- _.--79519E
dR.A KWn-* I_ -NNW.VI I FY_OFFICE.&INDUSTRIAL.-PARK____.T..G•I
COMPANY
WV RE='d+ W.
Dswlee•01ofQ10•0i001S •
4.
1
N, Kr.SficeeT 7 v_,
rr
n-pro--
00.0'
TIIII
2T00 --
U0
op) R15Kfor
f
Iwelnan
Lt
El
t.
I I
1
7I W./
11 t 'SOPS ,,. i
r
II
i t aE
I
r
0ZIli
e I•
e
I
4:s
e I
r
er
I
N S Ni
J 1
I 1
I
ap I
r '® 17ZIMP^P{, `, f o)
t. ® an- --
NOVqo
0 0
7 8.1I `"
o., DV 2I'T fKEE-
LOGY 5 f LOGK (v
lp,
e'ej rine: 2 , cm& . . aw 1911 971+C7 in, P,I LI.0 31 -.
EP AP:__C`
w•" CFtO
ll'=4>,•n'I79L£or,.ra-p[tyyr An. k'n'S
Q THE AUSTIN .
cu ..I 40 .. SITE PLAN 6 FILL SECTIONS __ .A•p 79 519 8
a=iI2I =.... VALLEY OFFICE 9 INDUSTRIAL PARK .•... G'2COMPANY
a•RENTON• WASH.hoolonw•owmeon•eutiovxs
sr.
TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
ra
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY '
Application No.' „nP—'097- 71'/
Environmental Checklist No. FGf-ll)y-81
PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date:
0 Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent The Austin Company
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
800 S.W. 16th Street
Renton, Washington 9Rf ;
206) 226-8800
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton. Planning DepartmPn t
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Grading and Fill Permit
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
Fill and grading of a 4. 3 and a 5 . 6 acre site to make the
sites acceptable for future development in accordance
with zoning restrictions.
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
South of Southwest 19th Street midway between East Valley Road
and Lind Avenue Southwest
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
June 1982
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
a. Special Permit for Filling and Grading
b. This site is currently zoned G General. Application will
be made to rezone the site to H-1, Heavy Industrial.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes, explain:
LID 314 include right-a-way acquisition of Hip NorthwaGt
corner of the subject site.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
X
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X
features?
ES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X
unique geologic or physical features?
YES M YBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , X
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
b) and (c) Grading and filling of the site will result in
overlayment of existing soil and change in topography.
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a,) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
X
quality?
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate , either locally or
X
regionally?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of
water movements ,- in -either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
X
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
X
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
X
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through X
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, X
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: (b) Water currently backs up onto this site due to
inadequate drainage along Southwest 19th Street. This will
be remedied by LID 314. (c) Same as (b) .
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES - MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
Xendangeredspeciesofflora?YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
X
species?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
a) Existing grasses will be overcovered with fill.
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
X
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: (d) At the present time a portion of the site is
swampy due to inadequate drainage along 19th Street. There
may be some small mammals inhabiting the• site that will be
displaced by the filling operation.
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?YES MAYBE N0
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including ,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
X
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
X
YEofanarea?T— MIT 0—
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing . _.X
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
X
for new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing, transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
X
YES MAYBE- NO
b) Police protection?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e)_ Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy,. Will the proposal result in :
al_ _Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
YES MAYBE - NO -
b) `Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
X
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
6-
Xd) Sewer or septic tanks?
YES MAYBE 0
e) Storm water drainage? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:_ Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
MMAYES YBE- NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or will-fur of full disclosure on my part.
Proponen :
signe
Paul S. Chiado
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
AFFIDAVIT
NOV 30 1981
I, Paul S. Chiado, an Officer of Valley 1,1 _
Office and Industrial Park, Inc. ,
DrP mz
formerly Metro Industrial District being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and 'sworn before me
this,j c day of Yt-b-e,— 19 d(
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Seattle
I,
P1/11/Wtr-
Name of Not y Public)Signature o Owner)
Donna J. Trulson Paul S. Chiado
800 Southwest 16th Street, Rpntpn, WA VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK
Address) Address)
800 Southwest 16th Street
Renton, Washington
City) State)
226-8800
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular -and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application.
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept.
2-73
i.N.„- ffl ''' - ".k. V'',., ..ii ...=P*''''y..,,,.
i. ... V•• .r,,,. ii,..''.• k 4.,
1.- ,... e ..., ,,, ......4 ..,,... --- .
re; ,,,,, t- 4,, P V.,r, ,t.
N.` ;f•
j:h. .
t•••.• l': -..-. 11:- E. ...
16' • •
i.t
l'..7-P.,...., 21%.-i..,,,:....•
FILE TITLE s p ..cf 9 A7 .....
5...1
i.-;.,•.. 4•
V• 1,
g,• 1••• s4
K•
1,,C
P;
fa
t'•
171'
i 9,•, k
a.
4! p;•::.,...,,,,;,145,0.1.,..;•,,lir
At
ip'...
10:
i.:•.'4-, ." ',Ai. 11.;. 4,•
f.
4--;
Vf- ' '''i, •i •...,..„ R . I8.' w-l-
4.54--
i'A,': 3.''..•
44v
11,-,-,..a.
L.,..4,.. .P. ';i; .17-H,,,.. k t .g..), Y .. .,, •
ft.tAi.
t, . .j.,... -,a1...,.......,. .,,,,. . *,,
T‘,,, .. •
14 A i„.
A.,v..;•
I''-','"•• ''., C ,k; ..stP t '*'• l''',:k
oot*s •)f. P., 1 ','''''4-i.''t " ,,
i.,4it&ii'
t: ',,.,. if,kiakt 47.A.f.:...P. ,.. d":..,:t '!..,4,1.• 414.5‘,L-.
4- 1,s-i:
le •
4;
1