Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-101BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE ' LIIC.ROFILMED 1/ 0/ Of -81 W_ 2 e Ty} Aw c .. i 9 ulrlir OP evrvaTnuenorv- I c y...Yf•, i - g t H ; a s ",-IIf /j Milli II [[ 1` 'gym • I moo OP zvrvlrva < a.`.. . J .... 1. / YI n' , OW7TN J oIr 3 QIm• li , F.' Ts,. J .. : NN\ ( . En Y.- 6 w mot.A2. BITE., c. OMr,';',U,,,,,w :tem, 0 . In su.. s.o,„ `„' linGe NIW0. v: i M1ia '.;9\ yf 1pp yy,, i:i'' e ri.Y. CC lO al® OBNAMIRN 1J - IILCNiRM\M\ J„n - " it 9W c3 5' A on ar:coy o.c..wry.o i.'v tra °•sate m RIYERIR,.m YWAi Y Rx 3 na j\ I. test n p< of rap site welding.2 s U ¢' ti -- ' _\ N II 4 ro , na.nt<o.p..m. ""°"'"". s."'"" Qerr„ s t.: ;;. .rest ..», RI wI. 8:Towage over 8.et in height requires seisnic , I. tihn:.;.- 3 dons under opearate omit fron the Building t. N. Pequirtd draft curtains to be Wet.over aisTes. 8 n. COntraCter to verify all dimensions.Do not scale[..,a An,. O.olta nee earnSITEno, , . .. .n''''' Ea iIIYtesting lab.RTixance Mere recuired.Nit TUKVYIL NaA REN TON P. e,>t..pestationsoar shall>el m< I°a souix n 5. The Co ntractor snall call the structural engineer for tn....et I ffNiEB`z I —;15. le!S..i. ;'`s'cr 1.. .. es< .l em raptmissionsthershallm0 11 c-- X. Contractor shall co-ordinate tile work of all trades to v. iiiifanl.s eta a ptp.e°.Ilelsq we p.ar ie VICINII+''MAP v. neet ra tns e.e a rate .I..net prao,m OW S Fp— nellelectrical ell nec-sera ne<ena post°Drab other pemits except Wilding.m ---- ni SITE PLAN - (sue s"pxs Ax r en,...o slm a°p ..e...e.. "°" e stgp ptpgn. Il ell i a density of.33 WI over 2500 square feet ing No.24 WO Is 1001 will uireaMYWO SCALE! 3vv am' shall be supplied by Mechanical Engineer at tire of Iii i/ g allon O. c demand.for rder mer.a.nrtma,mexs rry b. au,icings yin storage mane Nan 12,0 In height nay require tun V.......-v......---..-k 1 nvlR i GENERAL NOTES One s eP aPerea eJe(see.ar E0PW1..era..Pe t JO?O?O,OTML-ATOJ A n^B"Ja rt 1YM`, Lw'Li an,w 1I wC aM AND.,LPlwKnvn 10,iAN,W.IO3C 00WI+G9 1 I 1ygr PCP.R AVYWAN4 Ma..,Wla IIII 4 MOAN/NINON is coma:.ar....mrao).ev aw d t -- 4' i` r 10 rvE OPMON 0 MatTON L of tic¢. Q 4 1eb.wwwxn CV-0M OP 3003( rise- cawncTO aH4.L a a NA Neal T Y— Ha Or rays M4riw5s,SMowN.asAUHG WTnn. BITH 6x 1,0 401 NA CAA OVER.10,. w x I a.vx lvEE.Al.sows; T , .., c9.00.7.). WNW.'LANtA'PaE xu.rtx P.A...4x.ens Owwe a 4.0 wrEPn4.TeeA W.,0,-.06 0.AV PphW M W.0.M1 RH LxwG NA.I.a. D. eti,_,....„,,T a'e' / i1 r+'- II)I, rw+ar a >m 1 1 _ weer n APA eeeNNeanoa,talAIP u+ervww4vAY e T' / II l uNofif$.411 LYOR TO NorE 60.011.1.0.(W Ne eXn 5- 0 II II bI ANY PLAN W40a.4.,Cae0YB4rttC+RVONA xsa LAs0.nw.1NAINI a y... ._. I aa,. 1 III.- vr4 IN,'artn++Auw a:Taw IN-.4. was m ca e'r I n F I o.n[a°"e., worn 1.z W N x 4ANANt,C I, FI'„ aa W o 115, wa:M. ttza) tIIT4rrm vikoft; W'a m svown 0 M V Y il 0 • '‘....' j r; C .. 1,_ a :. I Y01. I_-_,_ r—cvawr U 9 CI ilF L II IIPI 4 V.. a n s.. a 2 I•i II'li I' , I r 6 0 Ir • 3 P. `M ALOLI6o 1.tx lYP•4- i? a 9 37 s, y.. tw III ) G.s..'5 Wal I • 1 r Ito ! ail it....• LT us "° 4( 0 u; 7 se..• wu 0T-`'e:'t," .. I1104I I Y M. en+c'k•.iw II CEwftY. .Td.1 MP-IL, N. scxse: r.o-v-d I1 EE JfIG DEfNL-T'P 24 u mvm w I. nm °oLANDSCAPEPLAN' - - a,,L1Nv _ n nn PLANT SCHEDULE 0 PO+Y 0+4Tt( cetwr,+-r uz-con o, Hws rxt 1'i*[^M" M'a+- rt P-.w,uu-c- ta•wl+w.w c6 n- x..n E¢Onw6 tT a. of y m yW.vt 6'-e,Yr O iuo Yx1v' 'an+o L ; p SrFa+P^u'wTw - M+RE rc Mz,4','ew+L ea+s, d-a• z w.. WO. I a '. z 901/ ,..-.-5,.*R•..'P^PS''-M'iu"N 1'Pb vN me al-01L CO s 1 CANA,[arvnn. - -*raw,(n+,00-ar xaa+( ¢.rt .- 5 S. i Q O i0. e.4/1060 a074W pw.-Teats - s+i _rqe-_ ® .. .u nwn-(aoFa.uM-v..ew.' - poi,reo+ame G R-n• ' ABil4pc4uu>1uwngeua MT"+Mn1S wryw4 NNW raavxr zu:-1,r.L u.s 0 'M. rvuuw4wn. .0n 1Pmn. 'WV,.'ws rulL,r,J a1-x' ? op, QJ--1. —- - ai' O 1 INNS TMw42K u -3I021410a axe N.A e b Mr. 1 r s Jnw4/0. 'Areas.N.,•,s 1. AtTrwrar 90.,+1 N. eA Ng90. m rat/DMA.,wew,r/,n- DOWNS F L z ur w.'sru.. P`w.M+r w '' e` ° w•r"...*'A.e4w c ae yPmacv. a n 4 .vswiu - -.141,N I.,0ar 0 s a0Mu.npMO-+.0 Pw 4ww. wr+s.wr ae4uvw e . 0..v.<Ma,1.,.. -r."..x 049.4 4111 a+aa s7w,y .3 co 0 _ tt---..1 n6PD 9 ary.Gx Y ,.. 1 f! u49044 0uwu -40041E_0w 04xw-+•n^T 9•rar rd oe.. 00101/ A gd7 1i% Q Q d J n 0•11 L s a p L xE.IN .' ;; CRPREPAREDBYNA' TOM STATE CHAPTFA,AMErOICAN,PD.O140 WORKS i . B2 v u U J V 9 a Ls E r o[n irivliuiaA'IMtc[sYi cx rireiEzeIxcAxo 6q' i TLETE0EANDiTITPO IAL,FOwac!!T AxoaDlaxx"s a fsf6 PL[i[o(wo m T£ Ib O. a Frxllcr ii`E s 44 AREiAPPAor Ix TE e. i a e ce. I DISTURBANCE.: rSrLDDAo,°'so:sro _D SEaa' s@s95o r I ill./ xu Im.2. Iwo•s aU .wx.,.'" cisofTronsOecx Wc AND A uDNF u'L AECBESAR2E• E 14 14 xiox x i rx.JIJ ar P a'.s x ADVANCE o[a wBILITYTONOTIFYTMiLlpaALL I< w Lr 12 cows c itM:Rvo 1 I L<.Lr.s _eay. 5.STORM I 'WALL BE CONCRETE.RUBBER 4 pp}} srw L Ie mRRDCAi MM 2-rx-il D D cA: LUNiru0154?iCE le RBtnt+Pl BE rirx...Terri., §Axws. 6.SANITARY SEDER PIBE3.f'ALL B b I L DASAEi[O asTx TO'4;i. R Pot VVIN[L Cx of[v i""" 7.DEDDINO FOR SiCWORAIN PIPE SMALL BE CLASS if,1P INDLIxE FOR g PEo A6& W 3 wxcvEPe3x[ ER.PArr.Lssv F Y Q BELOW PIPE TO SPRINDLINE.FOR PVC PIPt THE BEDDING SHALL BECARRIEDTO6zm y, ACHES ABOVE R-- D. DIAx[i a A°lo1i:a IOEa. FOfi:eu SANirARr SEWER LINES e 9 D uL Rue Y c r Divo"iiaixDAxuxOExsi ."-D INC. I om 6. xeace8860 ,4:',, CAD PLAN D.APPRAwAo cwreAx rrP OUTLET W CD 12.PIPE FOR WATER MAINS SHALL BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE MON a-r Col PUSH-ON LATEST REVISION.THICKNESS CLASS 52.CEItENT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL COATING SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI 74 OR LATEST BE I" Y PIPE JOINTS J SMALLER OF Q I I rcSla iL 12 CONFIGURATION. DRILLED.ACCORDANCE VI IN ANSI a 16.1 nxD SHALL OE I[s LB. C Vv e 14.ALL WATER MAINS SMALL BE PRESSURE TESTED AND DISINFECTED. LI lc in ACCEPTANCETEMPORARY PRIOR TO FINAL TIE-IN. IFS FOR TESTING AND WRI BD 3 CONNECT/ON TO EXISTING ACCOMPLISHED BY THEOBECONTRACTOOFRENTON.ALL NECESSARY R AND BE ON-SITENAIM PRIOR TOTERIALS CITY ' co FRONTS SHALL BE TIONTLINED TO NEAREST CATCH BASIN VITH A GTORH DRAIN PROFILES c[xr COVER OF ONE FOOT AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF ONE PER m/ CD a in Q. a o 14- O zr e .11. 111.111 , a 14—— 11 0come.um DATA,ON 2 I9/e-INIx,..[e<r.,0 B Jses/ ,. N ez. 0 ir IVTIBUCTIMieu FALL la Le i 11 TYPICAL PAVING SEC11oN -A-A- o i uo ..uu SANITARY ^AEWE.R. PROFILE Q W id n oC N• M mysige,x1 D. 3 2.2.2.2 EMENNIENEIEMI I i\t Cr*, I dIHSITEI i' . St.1 111 .„ew Illi .' n '., ,. •-.".:,.. '.c.,d c 1 II 21 i L01112. il 1 3 2.3. • c:75:-'::-.-:---> 3.. 45::: ... KEY PLAN k6=-1]. - e: •••,- 1 'i. 1 -''e7,.,.....;;s:•,.........4-. i 1.. .::t:...,- • a r il111111 Lo 40.%; 3, -- 1 (- 1 j 1.' r: • lil I '..E.e. E.YIEN-1- c./al-10N pi..c.c.4 r L2 •,4t1 ii-, 0 r. k,n i. 2 t,'.. t1ceii.i; ,,.•.,,. . •.-„„t-,,,rt,,,, •,f' p Ill ii aco..xt•erinep AA. . .............,-0....0..•. ....• _ 41.1c.0•••1 •.--, -A• 4. P ''''' 11M111111111.1 - U: t • ,'" DI y 1 , I-0..4.1 122t.or,.1.I g F.F. 1;17...m.:....,. F.F.--IT. sle-^ 7 i. ,.., T.1 m LLGEND le li 4 1 i N • I 1 Z :n.-.- 2...L.23-1e,k,C.e.ITOLIR. 1". 1 1,pi-- fle01•05.1.FINIZH•YreT.61./. 1 sn S .1.ws,, am.it.•,A+S.mm•a,1 -'.".".7....:".. U.0• 4, r="....- Ml•a-I11.46 22,...ry,e,..12....o 5,;‘..1.,, ,„, n iv _ ,.- c 3 ' , „ .,;,4..,,,,,.!,-4.11 ,.4,• c.e....4 W Ter ra.. 1 meow, Yams 4......,•••NeTt.e 4:). % f,, -IIZ'VC . J."' ,,... .1,- 11,T114.....15 I ''' ••'- '... 40 „4.. lb&COn 1-:r",ro;Peep.4••itl.3 4. 0.• ,p p> ...e. 3 0..F x g1•1`a KIIIIIE.141. . _ , $ tien••••.i t I r WrAWF. i • - - 0 10I.rilip...ardsT 1..r.4The,..Or IV C.v. .1.IALL el 114,.k,.47.7.••• .- pp., 1, .kC.6..1Ce.T.1.110.•.0 Kart IR..4011,11141.La IN-4.1.114 s .- 2. 1 g '0 co..42.4.ioNt. otv 233 I 1, 2. 3 .v..0 C a ,22.31.16.2.2•2 t .3' rutorro•22. 2414‘4" I ttr.o'T.Z.,.. 1 zoIriv..3.3-W0e..r.220 ,32 S. 1,33 3. al 0 22,211 31.i.iIF. C ' . I 3.1,..r421.3.a. .• . Ina Is i t to 4.2....ocia------... - . I Plc..0._I leop32.,61 - 2 0) 4 F.F. 1.1%.CE in = 0....,— telo.racera.•I p 0) 11 a 4 I CI II 4‘.. „Pell I\ ,:' ,pp . ._LU__[1... lc.E.KOATR.161 40 C15 0-'bkNYI.,.c.•.3,33 2, I In.•- 0,,,, J. tr,.,4,,,,,... -$ ,, I i 113.0 cc-., ; I •C•,,,4 4, Li,..c. ..,._A-- .......:24.,...- . , 1,,,k‘.. - if-, I 4e,4,---'''i a 1—j '' ...... 4—., --I 1 1 T::;Zi." roe 13.32 1 1 g3 1 i V I ko za I 8....6 tz.:lwlaCeaS.c.r..2.. W .1 iaila O wv LIP wsk. c.Qty.C e'd: ax'.e• u) KJ NM.0-1 P.v(.eoo Doc J Iqn ,,, r o<oI+o x r eo"^" 7 r I 9.anv seo: a 1 y y e Ix.loi+(s oNt G4.45 fiX.tsvq MIT irnaa nog y"a sD WD ai4nu 8 ei°Si.3'"r 1 u d II Il ( L Gam_—P_ •_-E E A WI;taW— y 1 Mf itw/+ yye R e't iN'D4W d pn1"i- Ri , w _ NW WIy 9 Sfkori c..... - E[p WHRRR 0 • 9 Ia r. m n 5.*co W(s i ....arva U.N.,. uv 7E:""r !" \+' r"c,{)i w+eu or h..w k w.;,+Se,n+wt.I e! von" o-•'"''•i i d! w LoNviruoRJgL 67c.,unoki 1-RALI‘vci24,6 66Griokl _ ti?", 1wmo F a s D m i 44 Tei.D w.nw B>.s kc ume 5LL SWIou AL.w kF4Mu 3 • f• . 0 wnnu.cc a 1 ulwx eu.avN Norma ov s.,n L v,orx 5u Mu J m • LgJGrTh NAL GEu,-rioK1 Tanusvcar SEctiaJ 4 x9DIL*F(.2,3 fio • YG 1,5.1..o •C I i7C 0 ui 0 a co a Zma art NO. a n m °ummmmmm 6m m p i L 1t _ E 4 u ix xi r iY4. R. 1'fPsV iFnN 7,0,.. e M la mYOW. NTa'.t2OPN t_4LN r M M NMul L.mOE, ra Io MP N- IM LeNe e.P i-.,Me•W.NIX o0eurIOn _ Ira' AITat, N rhl y r "r. •µ NaOd .4FNi l N.PJ. e rf:a E av , ..L',-. ,:.- i 444'M., nW. TLVT ION F bA OOYmN,TYPw JOUTN LVT O.I 4" I,e: y..l'o TTrv, l s ! ii,••, t' 3 OLOo 9cvmtwlNNI1•40.- II, i.W. NN TYnS2 .7.., REP LDw-M,NrTYnW- t SKA al`: mvtY A WTN btEtAtONe J Pww anw M1 KEZ T. EA5"f LEVATION4 Not''TH ELEVATION f W l vuA Vi le• 10 __-__j Io.O ,41.0.3-, tA,.1 C • I w4HK , I U ' 4. 0 W CIENAstcwP,eF evY}uCt-LiYD 4P INTO LaW.49 r Dfe ge.,.I,4r-8artE r 5EPev,Cb eYH6 ovHO.•D t14, o R Nw WFEO ' '— rr Ls....a. z ® /+ bN Neav.eJc 'te.w,<— -W = 4 'n R 1ll.0 iTaY/ Q. 45 yy 1 4 m tl m o m1. I-- w.,,..J _.. 1 1_ 1r -) mow.Q m o O6 pr," unwn,wa 0_— —__.—a 0 l. P e.n. — 51 me'^Lam) vy to . w•-s' u•ro'-.• -- -- --- ---- - f = gg a gok FLooR PLAN Mrz k, VI,-i'•o. BLDG. 19 a A5.19 fw ,,Nn.Posi,..t.Pns.— I I" - vim. ns b. ,,. 2. .... y,4F ' a ELriF z , 5. z..: re I, 1tn[PL, a 66V4 ul. a4-e !e ,"y'- ...: .. f'.._'.rENM1 A.N-ILO$P1 io..nJ 1 w,u; Ili Y awo..k vrce r.-*rrc.L- c I mo'IM 14-44r AST I.VATION 1..-11 r. M Li Gu'Na ss ..^w[ . rI NfL eb rrC . if.T6M.TMW . MIo Z41-P MLTv L° H rr c.s _ Nevlemr SW,' 1':,N;',:. rlmm .k. r.-wroc N g J icN.TyP.FNw.Leb[14e.LCT o o d .. r N' cl^ 1 -•` A. LnWe PRaM di'te uvs w.e.T t.TH ar .NL r' 4:•. u1N I VATION ac "2.2.4.L.NP-r-m r °2. r Ne«M' 'm iff.4 bt'fIM9- cEN11nr•-a. Nurse[[-Ma d µL P A Kce[IffM•IT•.bWWt N P'aere :r.' I ( U kf ELgT•KNPY2K d 4.4. wc.T "'(Vrri nNOWpf gp/P(ION) L__I P'INt I t1P.x pacer n, err- E fir, • I II 1 r 1— I y oqt rNie c n 'rvw ur<wNs! L' uao r e S:,,41 ,ga` - 111HB PTadiV s WET ..LEVATIOtiI 4Pw ta:4r 1 3 i- I is E sL:e `-uNas m•I e m nom p o 1Mto'rµ2 tWPr.A 8 A O aF___L ' LP. .6.P[_ 1/ r . I LULL v telt2 50 0 1e'. S., 1u.0 5. zQd 4 eLro¢y..• o a- o 1 m III P 00K f'LAH imp BLDG. 98 m As.12 INIM r-M 9 zr 21 T,;.,:,..,2,1„,,,,ttl,..5.4„4.1.744-4,:. wNea--M — L!RP....- Mf4[49144-1YP1,0,—• reN6z 2!-r6ci 9 for 16ee16 a j' e F-- 6 0, tai. NPla{aorf rd1f i iJ ior,. fir.„".., T? pP of 4t_4 L , 3 0' 61.1 Wu.-ewN Ww'nW 1, gVccEVPN1EDlusuc,u I G r ? A s LYi ` CEASTELEVATIOJr.nu°>Nop. NM MopC{FpNt hY+tEM- NO IZ y LLL V I O I V ew f1`;fr'" PPEFI I+. WT- gag. DRxw INti,. W...-, • 4 y 1 Uw.mNola' tYP.b V+ y 6Y11S 1cF.N(,e4-7l T n PMca Jax((PN) sTh PJti p Pay flflic Nn4T hlbN P6ubNx•• 0 9 j r?i e-PJ u.iYP. IWTbNe C6.Mx i tJ.e: d-o v-o xf>Id-0 x.., to *: J y_ Eq,.rtes I -4c olo. 1jM1 ilt. ki IF, fINxLRN+6LE(:o a 6I licNltF r-- .r s T t.I am- — ` Y_','"J+J+rti C Y;t,_ywa, u IJTI-I ELEVATION o '' II I ,o,,e n6roa.&R6.a,sN6 ems- Qz1•Ns rPG+LO ReeAR+u1sram ,,rlbvlo6 j4Nh tutu-- '611u4•tot fmMsAC T-M6pPN.Wf6f PM'e6M66f FF 0-5 R 3x a .i1 . 1 1 Q F 4d : co ,6J1 m , I t& 1 C mow. % F. pPSN. Y .. Y, aNP J ^' $-- rtez e9 a, z F'' 1111 a6.r a 20'd.m=d x...r. +n.J, 1 L g III FLOOR rLAN M6 n•.r BLDG. 17 $ A3.11 Pncc,:.., -,,.-x•4:,m wattsKnt Nw'fHNiwlore°Its -c•Za edrb I- al RIN,to MEI,carlNo--tt,44...a WMW NN f AIT VV s/rl. X.1"' eN 74,free .'--7 T KT.1N4N1 q>N 441.4r47 i . Ho W.- toP It sl N CkgVN vMwwsc. I 71% I-N/'. r'-, - 1 - _ wm.n 8 Srly .Ce' F-1 L 4e*4 wxrsa,-erwrw.l • f i L`='7 '.•- r,. t mwa,us,w,tf rk«•. T , 9 L/•vrs D sR NooiLEO.WM ctariFKNi . PoGviWG fYfl w• w NAM1 EA f VATION rrsM-+Tn.l• NO-TH LEVATIOI-1 4+WueIFYf. a aJnew TM ;yy-HiM 1.14, 4L.6 i` 4a '. - we.. t_- _ ' h., v 1 r, TI_ — 2-• m v t r_ a'-5' i-r' E we,-..T - LEVATIoN OL'fH ELE.VAT'oN T J:: cast•w a © 291,ff n e-e a_ y as o I fa.o 14•.041-.1 a, wee evwNo 44.44.44 I bw.exn eF.oa G I II 1 O mre-ttr, a 1 t .1: T'T f1ea., HNITKT U teaNesf ,» I:::ZeFIrttiULµf-c of AM[oN T Vag94 t' WRIA Foff-,... 1,6 MT 3I m i 4 9y C RI S R. o s EOreUNO.u e j.•.4, w.o a-. da- io o a.--{- E coi qm . ent III FLOOfz PLAN M lie• .,•..• BLDG. 16 i A3.1t. a J 0 b r' i BITE w: m.,.]: 1 CII A: 17' IL, - 7! 1 i Jam% o KEY PLAN s _ iy: H. II' IrA'-4 al 27. a,• a4•.o _ Y i-•-.t I. • _— e F/•('!. • 1 t i LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11' ry :• Y OrsoxxIxs.eano.ossx,xr I,,.AsxlxGrxx U _ _ J __ L •_ram -, w• y non oow..ai so sr`uAn n r wi°z1 t r' y x a S z m ytCa.mEn.%ii° Asn oprO xx. . ° II Y. E a Qt x:"abTM ixo c'oy xs xonrx, xsscn ixeo As soi,ovs: x Mi I_ m Tax. a esys•aa•e F7 1 axxt").niin . x.sxlxorox. f . y& M 91 . , &I 1 a E / 9 o:Vr x` m YJ u E"111 ri Min. max, - NEST FELTFEETH EAST s.!!ft ; auBUILDINballio A . ri:jc f. eT. d WILDING ry II J m Int7, , t jui.:64.7 C xWxPxA-w,Ix, 9x I - Ie, o., --- al 1 N _F 0 IDPLAII 14 sKi`ne""iau o xse`x max.,-: i 9.w .- V a '.F_: i 3 PERCENT OP SITE maw,. 'DA Y. grlIfO"iuos°wi olAIIEr. 13PARKINGMILSPROVIOECHti;ece%v— n ','1;:ek'IT:1,..-Ta: f Ac.s*ax- ')-. 00F N 0 Cm• ma liAt ,Axx IxGPROMO 29,,: zI 1,, • • i — •IwMe_/_3 3 cn 4IE)ILQING M19 la I- 0. d I11 EC 1. ri::,1a v N as n ICI riI 3 rwe a woA m m Plr w> x ee n«,w 9 1l`j.`` unx ° r i n I i F l — E CE n O II. 9:xL.,.., K- eo wwq t It E L — L i as mm. 9 ® . y co v NexM coA l j i SITE PLAN - PLGY.S 'I Z I'.W. 19 Lo1 12 olloot 2 B„B OF R4N BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT NAL 73 RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 ...MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-25409,0 co• 09ltE0 SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPO H MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: anuary 14, 1986 TO: riles.(All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM: C` 1' o er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short of arking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking, lot line adjust ants have been approved in which 'a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30, 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to construct Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." Y i aiz;dig' E koe'i ng. RJB:JSM:ss PP. re-E.FP'0to t kcL ) A. 91I- 5A 0-11-1 2156Z SR • 44-85 Fa SA CD-Es ' 6 8totogii.1,31 kHal: a Relih Yki-13- M , 91-.145- NUS OF R i ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT toll. g• RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0 P 1 TFD SEP1E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM March 12, 1984 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: ( , oger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Holvick, deRegt, and Koering, Site Plan Approval SA-101-81 The applicant has not followed through with this application and has in fact filed and received approval of a site plan application for this same site in 1983 (SA-081-83) . . Therefore, this application file is being transmitted to your office for placement with the permanent records. RTB:JMS/dm OF R1,4, 4 46 ` w;: ° THE CITY OF RENTON41 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® 235-2552ZsdL p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9. o j co. 09q o February 5 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR David Schuman First City Equities 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4040 Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REZONE APPLICATION ADJACENT TO SPRINGBROOK CREEK Dear Mr. Schuman: Pursuant to our meeting of February 2, 1982, with Mr. Ed Sullivan of Holvick DeRegt and Koering, this letter is to summarize our findings. First, in order to consider the rezone application, the 17 acres required for the P-1 Channel system must be dedicated by separate deed document or by the recording of the proposed final plat currently in our offices. Second, a summary of the findings of your engineering staff regarding the storage capacity within the 17 acres as compared to the required storage from the HDK site should be prepared. Once the dedication of the property has been completed and the summary of the flood storage solution has been provided, this department will be prepared to recommend that the rezoning of the remaining 25 acres within the Washington Technical Center project should be approved. As a practical matter, we would strongly recommend to the Building and Zoning Department that the application be accepted at such time as the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the final plat to the City Council, subject only to the receipt of the flood storage summary. As we also discussed, we can consider your rezone application as an amendment to the prior application so long as we can obtain fresh documentation and application forms so that the'record will be clear and concise. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Very ruly )ours; ? k/(1,' -/2//6ta avid R. Clemens Policy Development Director DRC:cl I cc: Holvilck DeRegt and Koering Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator OF R fr, z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 al= MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 AO' I TFD SEPZE4" January 6, 1982 BARBARA Y. SFINPOCH MAYOR Mike Selman Project Manager Holvick deRegt Koering 1 Oakmead Terrace 1230 Oakniead Park, Suite 210 Sunnyvale, California 94086 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER Dear Mr. Selman: Persuant to our telephone .conversation of Monday January 4, 1981, there appear numerous issues to be resolved prior to the actual filing of the final plat and approval of site plans for the buildings in Washington Technical Center. The firm of Bush, Roed, and Hitchings has been working on the preparation of the final plat, while the firm Lance Mueller Associates has been working on the specific site designs. As a result of unanticipated delays resulting from the issues of bonding and natural flood storage, the submission of the final .plat to the Hearing Examiner by our office has been delayed. Regarding the final plat, two issues remain. First, the fact that the Valley Parkway,if dedicated, would require full improvements or bonding at this time, and secondly, the issue of removing natural flood storage capacities from the subject site. The first issue may be resolved on the face of the final plat. Both the Public Works and Building and Zoning Departments will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the right-of-way adjacent to the Tracks A and B be acquired by easement, for utilities and future roadways. The Land Use Hearing Examiner does not have to concur with our recommendation and may subsequently recommend to the City Council that the right-of-wady be dedicated and bonded. The Public Works Department agrees with the concept of allowing replacement of the natural flood storage eliminated in that area that will be dedicated to the City of Renton for]the P-1 detention basin. However, the applicant needs to submit a specific proposal on how it would accomplish the replacement of this natural flood capacity prior to the City agreeing upon a specific wording to be placed .on the face of the final plat. I King County has already acquired a fill and grade permit to construct the detention basin between the pump station and SW Grady Way. Any construction done by your firm in this area must correspond to those approved plans or your firm must acquire a separate special permit for the excavation that you would be conducting. f MIKE SELMAN JANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE TWO The processing of the final plat and subsequent site plan approvals become complicated in the actual sequence of steps to be taken. The site plans as submitted by LanceMuellerAssociatesdonotspecificallyfollowthefinalplatasproposed. The site plansshowcommoncurbcutsandaccessesalongpropertylines. This is specifically prohibited by Section 4-2204.2A.1 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the CityofRenton. This requires that the curb cut be a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line. A specific variance request would have to be sought by the applicant to allow this.l This is not an issue if the site plan approvals were granted prior to theactualreviewofthefinalplatbytheHearingExaminer. However, if the site plans were approved in this fashion and the final plat was then processed to the HearingExamineritisprobablethattheHearingExaminerwoulddenythefinalplatbecauseitcouldnot 'meet this section requirement. Therefore, we would recommend that the final plat be processed first with the site plan request following along with theappropriatevariancerequesttothissection. In addition, the site plans as proposed suggesting major modification from the original intent of the development under FirstCitiesEquities, the railroad spur, which was anticipated to be focal point of thisdevelopment, is no longer functional because of the location of the buildings. It is not even identified on the site plan and appears to be in direct conflict with the proposed parking scheme for the buildings. The Environmental Review Committee has conducted their preliminary review for the site plan approvals and is very concerned about the limitation of the development in respect to the approved EIS. The original EIS only considered a maximum of thirtypercent (30%) office in the total development. The proposed buildings to the designs suggest that a greater proportion of the buildings could be used as office than originally covered in the EIS. The building design suggests that somewhere between sixty and I seventy percent could be utilized for office space. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee must request a traffic analysis to consider the theoritical maximum of the new building design. If there is a significant deviation from the existing EIS, a supplemental Draft EIS will have to be published, circulated and a Final EIS prepared before any hearing on the site plans. We would recommend that the processing of the final plat be completed prior to the processing of the site plan. This may delay the ultimate date of construction, but it will forestall technical and possible legal difficulties in reaching the final product. If we can be of further assistance please contact me directly at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Adminstrator cc: Bob Roed, Bush Roed and Hitchings Bob Fadden, Lance Mueller Associates a WI I\LI\ 1itiU APPLICATION SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE VSE ONLY File No . h 15-I' i I 1 11 C1 Date Application ',Fee $ Pec•ci pt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1TII}:O1lc;U 6 : 3 . Name HOLVICK deREGT KOERING rh6ne 1-408-736-B533 Address 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Sui to 210, Sunnyvale, Cal i fornia 94086 2 . Property location S.W. 7th and Powell Ave. S.W. , Renton, Washington 3 . Legal description ( attach additional sheet if necessary) See Site Plan CITYC,' F?LpiTUN n NNEIVE U L U 1 1981 • UILD DEPARTMENT 4 . Number of acres c'.r syu.iro test _—See Site Plan Present zoning MP 5 . what do you propose to develop on this pro;:erty ;• BUSINESS PARK i G . The following information shall he submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan ( include se thac :; , existing structures , easements , and other Scale factors limiting development-) . . . . . . . . . . 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1 " = 10 ' C . Vicinity map ( i ncl ulit2 1 lnd use and zoning on adjacent parcel_:) 1 " = 200 ' to 80( D. Building height and irea (e'xi :;tint) and proposed) 7 . LAND f SF HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date A pesl1e•d A p p e a I ,1: d o r' - - -- ___---- Remar:Ss Planning Dap Rev, 1-77 AFFIDAVIT HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING, .a California corporation , declares that it is the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this 9th day of November 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of California, ' County of Santa Clara. 1 1 Name N6tary Public)Signature of Owner) I 1 5 Palo Alto Square ,, Suite 101 maw stmuntoieasrtesseallimaniHe entseenn9um l Address) 1 NARY JO ALDERZON NOTARY PUBLIC—CAUFORNIA• ti. ,,a-'t0PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY California My Commission Expires July 25,1983 Palo Alto, CxJCtileeeeeBaeeH0a3e9HHaHeetO®38HHUleD3H®aoeacaae C l t y) State) 415) 493-0111 Telephone) FOR OFFICE; USE ONLY) i CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by m and has been found to be thor.ugh and complete in every particular and to conform to the ruletna'ra R .* [ ' 'r s of the Renton Planning Department governing the fll lf 1 - . ' • ation . 2119 81 Date Received DEC 19 By: T MENT BUILDING®d, Renton Planning Dept . 2-7,3 i • • ; • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM D CITY•t3F:I1.NTQN FOR' OFFICE' US€ANLY'':`:'' ; DEC,,2,1 1Yb ' , Application No. .' "' ' . BUILDING DEPARTMENT .Environmentai• Checklist No. PROPOSED,' date:FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: i Introduction The State Environmental Policy 'Act of 1 71 , Chapter•:43. ..• re es' ' , ,'9 21C ,.RCW .r'aquires',',:•:. ' all .state and local, governmental agencies to consider environmental.. va,lues.`both'",for tti'elr,, own actions and; when 'licensing private proposals . The Act also requires .'.ttiat'! an':EIS,.,be for all major actions si nificantl affectingthe ualit of•'the,,environment.•'` r'.prepared i " 9 y q y" The purpose of.'.,this. checklist is to help the agencies involved determine;whether'''or,•not a proposal .is su.ch, a' major, action. Please answer::the , following questions as completely as you can with': the'.informat,ion ":)';) - presently available to you.. Where explanations of your answers are required .'-or where: .,.., you believe ,'an .expianation would be helpful to government decision makers ,;',°include your '".' : explanation in ,the space provided, or use additional pages if. necessary ;You' should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and`which are rele- vant to 'the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now 'will' help all ' , . ' agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental :'review with-..', - out unnecessaryl .delay.' , The following 'q;uestions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which :.' you are. currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers' should include the .impacts which will be caused by your proposal when. it is completed,' : -.,. even though completion 'may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all : '' of the agencies' which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with" out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE,: 'This is ,a 'standard form being used by all state and local agenciet.'in the State ' of Washington., for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may,-,not apply to your proposal .' If 'a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the. ' . next question. ' ' l • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUN"0 1'.; -:Name-.of Proponent HOLVICK deREGT R, KfIFRTNG 2. Address :and phone number of Proponent: 123Q:,:OAkmead Parkway ; Suite 21.0 ' u n`'.Va .e;.' a 'a •ornia J4n2A ,: I..n rr•+aaa, Y:'Yin:•'..'Y1;3 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency-requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Spri ngbrook 'Technical Center - Bl dqs. 16 through l' " 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but,not limited to ;.tts. ,, size, general design elements, and other factors that will ,.give 'an accurate,. understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of 4 .one-story tilt-up concrete buildings 'fbr'.'a ':total' square. foota ge of 40,708.. The usage' of the buildings will be, of;;.'a''; busi,nes`s park • of', li.ght. warehousing nature." The buildings are being constructed as empty speculative 'shell;''structures. 1 tiff i Y 1 7. Location of prop.;..al (describe the physical setti „e of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including' any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of, the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The •buildings are located in an existing business park area. ' The present ste .is nearly level . The surface is grass covered. Significant will be retained where possible. 9. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Fal1 , 1982 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals• required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Flood Control - King. County Hydraulics' Building, Zoning, Sewer, Water, Storm Drainage, Electrical , Mechanical ,- • Clity of Renton. Final plat application in progress at City of Renton under tarlington Industrial Park. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or•further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Yes. Additional park development will occur later. See existing draft E. I.S. 11. Do you know of anyplans byothers which may affect the property Covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attch any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposed ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed ' at some future , date, describe the nature of such application form: NfNF II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Y • MAYBE ' b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X Yes` MAYBE d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES ,. MAYBE • NcT e)II Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , 1 '•. ,; : either on or off the site? X = . • YES MAYBE Nif f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YE5 MAYBE : 0— Explanation: c) Some filling will occur to bring building pads to min:floor elevation. d) Site will be graded for drainage. y 3- 2) Air. Will the p.-..rosal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air Plquality? YE MAYBEFru— b) The creation of objectionable odors? X TES MAYBE 0— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in. 1 a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of ilb,i* water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YtS MAYBE W- c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?X • TO— M YB al— d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X 'body? i Y S MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X r SEA MAYBE NT— f); Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X Tim MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through ' interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? I':( X YES MAYBE N( h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE I1 I ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE MS— Explanation: (b) A complete drainage system will be designed. c) Normal building usage of water will occur. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any a species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops . r` microflora and aquatic plants)? T ' MAYBE 1i . :.' b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora?X TEI7 MAYBE 0. . , cl) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or' ,. c,. i,;;;,,'' in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?X ; . 1',TrT7 ;MAYBE Fib d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural; crop?71i MA BE , NO Explanation: (a) Some existing trees will be removed: . °':,.i • c) New landscape materials will be introduced. 74-j.ii a . 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including 1 reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)?X YES • .MAYBE Nam° - :<, j b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or I endangered species of fauna? X YESSm MAYBE .NO•.' . c) ; Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Xoffauna? YES MMAYBE NO d) I Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X TM"Sm FAM WO— Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YET MAYBE' AS Eplanation: New vehicle activity will occur. 1 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE AS Explanation,: On-site lighting will be installed 1 1 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X TES- WET P ti, Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ' ' X • YES . . MAYBE f , • •,: ' b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? P ' ;; , . Y?s ' MAYBE Fie.' 'A-. Explanation:Natural materialswill be_ used _during the building construction process and during building operation. I. to) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including', but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? i X •` if1;1'."Y . Mi(Y BE` A ..,, 0 Explanation . 11) Po'pulation. Will the proposal alter the location. distriy a'`ulf.. " bution, density, or growth rate of the human population',' •; ; of an area? r P,r `..r i: -1MAY BE Explanation: I r(. C , t: '•. 5 1.i. i,,.4{jl.iY.t:Oi;;;J.i 7 (12) Housing..;' Will'proposal affect existing housi or t.• t'+ ...,' • .-': ti '^••?',;;;'.g! create a demand additional housing? X :f'' : `, :' MAYBE ' N0 Explanation: Work force will come from existing population base. 13) ',Yranlsportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYS b) , Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) I Impact upon existing transportation systems? X VET— MAYBEN6— d) .Alterations to present patterns of circulation or q. movement of people and/or goods?X ':' ; YE ,c,' MAYBE RU7 . e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Y MAYBE N0 . f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , Xbicyclistsorpedestrians? YES MAYBE AU— , Explanation: New businesses will generate new traffic movements and al, reguirement for parking, See Draft F. I .S. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : i a) '. Fire protection? X YTT7 . MAYBE b) F Police protection?X r r`'j`MOY BE .',; .'s. ,,,. c)I Schools? . t , ..:.r. •,•,;; i WSJ .,: s,. Y 9 B E' '1 u 't;tj'J. d) Parks or other recreational facilities? i. . .. ,, MAYBE e)I Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? • •' , X : E '., N® f), Other governmental services? VES • MAYBE tr.' . Normal public services will be required. . ' , . .. ' r', i Explanation: 15) Energy,. Will the proposal result in: fta; 0Y'1' to t a)' Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? p,b,i:''•>' ' i! r,,X0 Y ;. MAY BE,..,;,' .r4, b)! Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require ;' ; %:` ,,::,1:+;j. ti. ;ti if, fy r the development of new sources of energy? ' 1f.!,.y,,N YES MAYBE ATT7 b) New powerp 5, Explanation: service to the ark will be required. jr rI. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for++neiv . •s° j. 7; 41 systems, or alterations to the following utilities.'`;o-r •F ,ciT,Aqgl ' p:1,- -.`.:,'j.,„'[r'ryryti' a) Power or naturalgas? t `r;: , yrt} 61117,, i.. . ,,^V'•.. a 1 . -it n lAY-B E..;;T ;1'Y, t't.:l't''1,<?'tha I Cf.rn" j,., al: ;,• `;: i .;!.r' a1' tom ISi41. Ufa'' +• _.: h'B •,'i, ,I. •If"" I , b) Communications systems? l a,,, .-, MAYBE NO c.) Water?4' IX'i,',' r. YES '• :MAYBE N0. H ti r: I. i.,.";;':',..'m„,LI,:'fTgl,t . r,-, ' .• .i• / • „ ,,,: ,,T,..7 ...„.., 2,•-•!-,;! 1;•••4t,i,,,i :K•;;;,....1. , ::. , , . .3:1:, T! ,••• 1,11••,/}•;', ,.•.0 N,,,';:• ' • !.•.'•' 1.',1,r3.••t •'),,,•,,,f,••i, 1,•'..i,;•,,tt '; , A!', i:,,',1, • :.' ., . . i.''7,;.':1::''".', 1.,!"i.'1. ,,;4it,1 d),.4::Sewer or sepi.ii., tanks?X .:;! '• ,. -. . .'.:',,;',!!:,j:,")..ii, YES .'„..MAYBE i.,..•.,: '..-.: ... ' 1'...:,:r;:. .,,! 1,:,0 J,-.,,.,,I,,,,.: H'; , 1. 't: '• ' ! . i ! : . . •• , L.., , . , , •, ,',.,,, ,,,:.:.,-.4,,, e) ::-Storm .water drainage? X' 1;,•••. • • • •:••• •"'•,,,i,•-•'',-- i l• ' ••• 1. . ' 1::•.,.•: • ., ' H, YES ,.4' RiCrir i''''''''; o14f.-1;.,,,.-i. ''','"," •.', :' i' .,, ;'.,„.4,4",,,,,;j44.i.,ilf)A,Solid waste and disposal? X1 . ' :: f,...1., •• ••• • . - .,.. s.f...,;.44c.14.,,E.H.,,,,1•-,.,••%••).'., :" •,."'''ul"'''' ' .'1,.., Trr:,. tV4Y-Tff,.. i,,, ,,rf• : ,... I,, i!. .i..,,,..,;.!;:li.,-,,.., ',,f,::,:totipfi,.-02,Explanation:), Normal buildin hook-ups and 'services will ' bere' uired0440,64:;::K,"ii?'4W.4,' i':•' ,••••i ,,' ' •••,','!')..-,,,, : .. , : , .„..;„•,. „,i..:,,,,t,,,,,.I: : 1:, 1. • ••.:;: 1 : ,-• ! •: .L''' ''!1. ',..1'1', ..• :' • •:";.--• q`••qt!!1'1,iill•-.1::A-•::s ff:',,,•,•4•V,',Y,••r,0,-4;••',..!:),71i•::.•.' I 1 : 2.1,.::: : .'.`I• '',..-".,':'.-.'•':•;.•.' il'''',!!-',i'l , 17) Human: Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of • • any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X I, ' YES - MAYBE WU- Explanation: I 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of . any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically :offensive , , 't-., . • ,•7;-", - .".. - 1 sitolopen to public view? H:•(,,'.),.•: ', • ',:' X : (::'::' .• 2 '''' YES , r,KAY BE F107'.C., .iIp ,•(, A,,14,,,,, ••, , Explanation: i •••••••• ‘:'''':',;,',:•••:•!, - 11 I. :*:'‘• i 1 1 c;. , , • :: ,*,,..1v14;,:.'.,-,19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the '- ',-,,,,:.,•,,', .' : :. .-.',A,.4k.: • . T,,r,:,.: - .•:.quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?H, - z• 1 YES MAYBE MAYBE 'H-tr4:1-''' ''•,, Explanation:Existing golf course will be closed. I. • 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an I :. • .' alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure,' object or building? 1 TErrof..•.41 A Y B E ' • ••,';'... - ' I.A"I'l i •, ' '• •••' , , Explanation: I . , •., i,,4,,,,I.,..:..„...,,i,,,, ,,,..-, . .. i.f.•,,);:' •.,4',.:!,i.. . ••, ,, ••,;•:•I.•if.•• . I ', • r ,.•c .;• ,, ••.1,..f....e.f.o.,./.-4-.:!., ‘:. ‘. .:.....,,,,,,...... .r.v,., .,. c-vp,,,..-.,..,,i. ',,%q!„1,1,•41., ,,,,',c,..,..i,,,..2.,:hi,,q4i,:',,--; 1 .- f - to,,,,o.4,,,,,. . ; ,, ;..-pt.p.z;1,,,,•,..1.,.-„, Jif4t.f. .1. .',', .,:::i ,.,•/.•:- -:, . ,.....',‘ i.,.:,,,i-.e....., ;4.,. ,.,,-,,,,l,fflar-„,,,..t,,..... Iii.,:,..:;,-,• III SIGNATURE. 1;,'''-,..e-';'..- ,`,.tel-',. I'. . ' ' . ' . .•....:'::8n2-'.'.''L '. 1 , i • he undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge 'the'above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw .any decla- -./ ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this :checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 of full . . c osure on .my part. I' Proponent:if,•_(,L, .",/ ... ' ., -4‘, ' '' "''' I s .,,, e. ,. , Or, •••.,.../,.. 1..:.01....,,,'',.'it!..;•,,,!1•:.;:!if•',Itt,i.,,,,,,,"*.,"'le4 i . ' :• . ' '• ' ' ill, , 1 il,, 1,,.'',:,.,.,'..: i' f,4i(:19,,,'I4.,!-- 4. t.,?.,1,!„,,,:w., l'ek!.,;,,,,;f,,,,i1;1/4, 1,;• 1•6v4,4f iilalitA N!?4,,t1e1,11:4l-5-.7tf:14-;:. ' ari v4V.:a i W.,:•.' t.".:,1,r.',Y..,....-1':':;1,1'41. name p r' n ,0:. i,i,,,;•ics, ,ii:,1;,I,Iik'' ,';'i..4.2,..3.•,;;;•,;.•' ••„fi3'•Ack,b,,z,4 ,, Zaiiee P.: :: - er,:, 4*,.clof: :- l.ii:vit,:!..,, --,,,.,.:,•:.„..,. c.,: 1., .". ',, 1,,. ,,,, ,1t,, ,, ,?), .., ,,,,,,„, ,,..,• -, i,)1 k, ,,14,o....,%1`...,:i• s•;-I,l'.'.!,-1,'",' : i 1 ',' ' ': •.: ': 1 II q V:111;tli•.:0 '•,:',, '!,:'01'"iv': •':'•: .-"; i.:IL 0406.;ki:::z. , ii,,:i':; :' City",Of Renton •,',;,.••': l',',",i,,t".:i.r,.. . P1 anning"PoOartment 5-76 i. -, 1,11!•',1,'-.','.' q'...-,',- , :'. ,., ,.:•• .1 w';,i,. ,.. t.,,.• • - ," ..j ,, .'. r,..,!,.„,-: : • , • -:: ' iiii,, .i I 1 • i, . - • Revision 3/1981 klize i RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application P® w '•%; p- CV Location: We . ' z.. r , _ tr,510€1 sato i 5(teeto 7 ittl.N. Applicant K e&i yg a; tea•"- de. 119 LQ ; Public 'i6"erks Department ngineerimg Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: / 61 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1 ' Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department 0 Bui 1 di rig Department Police Department Others: COMMENTSCOMMENTS ORISUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON s > ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ET: Approved Approved with Conditions fl Not Approved Signature or birector or Authorized Reprsentative REVIEWING DEIARTMENT/DT-VI-SION : - _--- I D Approved Apvoved with Conditions n Not Approved or Authorized—--- --- -- — —- -- — --- - - DA I E: Signature- of Di rector t.hori zed Representative i Revision 3/1981 mitzci si RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application; 010®72I fitay vete 710locale 69 Location:-- e,. • }'' a at3 too sft1 51tj APp l t6d J IG: Public Works Department En( ' eering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: fig/See • Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division El Fire Department U Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JLstr REVIEWING D ',PARTMENT/DIVISION: -a iy ee7- ii 1Je Approved pproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 1, a, 717 t—CYs j f s C `-'• e - :///(a'f/cL 1/OLj r l o /f'I•--i J ce 1 fr L! ld/4-r+ /rCS c2 C/O c,..t DLi P-o(-0 Q...// 4).e Sw .7<<_41 ; 1 /'=4_-l F7 e6-e are Cella/fio#-S 7e didf a/ eadi pat-6c ipa iPc fi"i ram DATE: / '2. Si gnature of D ctireor or Authorized Represe ative-l:A''"" ---- I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : D Approved fl Approved wi th Conditions ri Not Approved DATE: Signature of Dli rector or Authorized Representative -- — -- 1 Revision 3/1981 e/1") RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: si,® 0179/ ____15./70767 '' i 6'/Relvetsrf740 he Cv!I 0 - x-.f, _.. lam/easel i rk 8- fia• tea c 'o _Location:Ait/v_sta cs:A) seiu 6_54J 7 S'yt. ----= Applicant : ®erda l HcI ' kdHelvickvkr, i IQ ;ElPublic Works Department Engineng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ifigifsi.x. LITra fic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ^"" t' l i'fies Eng. Division o ire Department Parks Department r,__... ..-. ,t Building Department,: Police Department Others: C'A4TION -SHOULD BE ;PROVIDED;'INCOMMENTSORSUGGESTIONSREGARDING---THIS -APBPLI WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMIENTS_-_T.Q,..T.IIE.-.P-.LANNI-NG -DEPARTMENT,.BY,.•5 : 00: ,-•I? .,M. ON 1/142"ka- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c---7/ 1'e— Approved [ Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved Oil Sile- -t'r e, hyla t 4 ci a c6e-s Gt` r 7iert o .) CD rtruc_ -12 ! DATE: /o? ' 3® ` mil Signature of Direc -or r- Authorized »resentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -_ --- 1.1-6C.17`( OgeY----- j Approved r!-'N,pproved with Conditions Not Approved SE 1334C - ci0 E or S IC-> QL.DATE: IAA! Signature of 'irec or or Authorized Representative UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I d 50-$' LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER D SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WATER At Fie._ cows GemSYSTEMDEVELOPMENTCHARGE - SEWER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CRANE • SEWER AtC APPROVED WATER PLAN yESAPPROVEDSEWERPLANS APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. Yss FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS e l v l l.. e Revision 3/1 981 /42/2474/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: $4•'0/e9/ re"- PFA v,L . "9ves14°7o a 6/.0) f:f t wet w' e CAA• DDcation: s stdo`F rt good'A.ur..7c+fitJdttt.1 SES4.1701,5% Applicant: oe ' Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /16/9.)... Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ""'"' Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Ie'partment uilding Department iPolice Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions [J Not Approved Z0c -1---i®n) 4e- 457 & s cPi-'c,J.J iZ I 34 C/f s'4s 5 4-c'-'0 iO C fizb I .'.iU 6 97(1--oe ?ci 4-1 -S" 6 ' AJ W P REVIEWING DEPAR N DIVISIOONN` G T.S 7Da 4J 'v 7741 Approved Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved j DATE: 4' C. 1 Signature rector or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 0 t1121/g RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application. 6149/ " (51747 e coca 60)___ Location: 4 iauseilyiesErSpasae, 54,0 s Applicant:--_h lc IQ ; Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: M/StA. Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: "®` Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department 0 Parks Department ui1ding Department Police Department Others:- I COMMENTS ORISUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON s/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved fi Approved with Conditions 1g Not Approved See. attached memo on Springbrook Tech. Center in the same area. II DATE: 1/5/8 2 - Signature of rec'i'.or or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I Approved 1-1 Approved with Conditions 9I Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative OF• R4 oy n o THE CITY OF RENTON o „ 4e z r.,.« t4. - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 o n k 54 I . BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR a POLICE DEPARTMENT o9.0 0. HUGH R.DARBY, CHIEF O9gT o SEPlE O Q 1 MEMORANDUM TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson 1 RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers .. was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton 'if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placement of outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, ; and locks. Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. ' At the pr6 sent time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7th and Hardie unthatis believable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore, it is my suggestion that this development not be allowed until : 1) There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. 2) Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady. . : Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued on this project. 1 4:24/274 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: $4 / /iJ SI rlAROVA , k ize.SY Q (.Ca7'! y 0/ 11.64emSdelialSelarligtialAgrAMPAtark 4 elf.••••nW riWa t = • oc a t i o n: jl 5(Ai7 s,wt_KQt_s4_,7 5y Applicant:X pai-Ck4 Public Works Department Engineer'ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:AA OTra • c Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: . """"' S . I t' ies Eng. Division ire Department Parks 'Department EDBuilding Department Police Department Others:----- — --__—_.._ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. OIL REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: jPe I . Approved e<proved with Conditions 0 Not Approved On Si; e- • +'r e h y 04-d St 4 n ce a yes 1fGt'i`n.e- oc cOP2st;- c-t o t I/ th DATE: 107 '30 ` Signature. o U rec- or r Authorized »resentative RE\IEIvING Di:PART IFNT/U]:"-:;Ii N : ----- Approved fl Approved with Conditions . • D Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Au thuri zed Representative Key ision 3/1981 ® dWegjd RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application,i: WHY Sir WAVAL tidocaVab r0Q14 eoeJta Q ® ti f•/'6 pLocation: 4. Q1 S aSA Are 5 54p Applicant :_ iti ;; ,, Reit_--- TO :LJ Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:491C496). Traffic Ena. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire epartment arks Department Building Department D Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 4(41JON4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Apprved [J Approved with Conditions [ Not ApprovedI i DATE: Signature of Di rector or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DL,RARTti1ENT/D]:VI.;IoN : Approved ElApproved with Conditions D Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ci culated : /m4c219 $® Comments due : / 4/5,46 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - lI( - IL APPLICATION No (s ) . 9I PROPONENT : Koeri a t Ala Neck de Rely PROJECT TITLE : SIB A uAL (lAht,ssAjotifieNli'tchniCejG / ) Brief Description of Project : PeeVe 4ic lVoseshra+4®0)®44 5 I dle l l usej ets Q Zevitte Ph (oP for licyAlitila re hoo /n LOCATION : side„-e 'Lieu Ave.Ste 5®a1Aale Stu 721 s SITE AREA : # 3.®e®ece+e% BUILDING AREA (gross) ' i#140ifl®ge, DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : b IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : V 2 ) Di ect/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wa er & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : V/ 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Licht & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : , View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : e/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I V 15 ) Energy : Vf 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : V 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI DOS More Information Reviewe by : CPI0.94-)--title : ,Ira/Ty 0$.1 /fists Date : 1/4- /41 FORM: ERC-06 r- Date circulated : ® /077/$f' Comments due : //5,40 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - All - gy APPLICATION No (s ) . v/®/-9( 9 olvi'c.k de. RePROPONENT : , ®egn'p,d/- PROJECT TITLE :TomSr XMC (Wez x 4 iel1°`t t° eVca1 Co;si Brief Description of Project : REIgie.bleak(Vil,ie SA, seld'c.atgVa.of LOCATION : W.Sideoo ,A Ave Ski 50091 de seu 7t $''t SITE AREA : t 3.06dcvc5 BUILDING AREA (gross ) t V4 7®g4 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 45 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : r/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wa er & water courses : 4 ) P1 nt life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noifse : 7 ) Liijht & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 1 10 ) Risk of upset : rf _ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy\: 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : t/- 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI X DOS More Information Reviewed by : np-,.,( „_ Title : Date : 747// Z-- FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : iw(a lia® Comments due : ®/ 40A, ENVIRONMENTALENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF = 1// - el APPLICATION No (s ) . I-9 . PROPONENT : K-eri HoLveck de Reiti1 PROJECT TITLE : Srpf- ArePReVAL, (tat,sicts 40#(1";c44$44"Ce,./ adltbro) Brief Di scription of Project : ddicedetV Siv ,61efg.1/6-V®p de i i wee? igs a d0eop5,•- ph ear l` r i dl lle r+eAoa hy. LOCATION : Si ®f ell Ve•94S®4 T/945'6.. 7 5t SITE AREA : 3.42160'vC$ BUILDING AREA (gross ) t 1/4,22s 4. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :K' _ 2 ) Diiect/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wa er & water courses : 1 4 ) . Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : o Land use conflicts :2--7 View obstruction : z= 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Nurrber of Dwellings : X. 13 ) Trip ends (ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : X _t COMMENTS : Recommendation : D I DOS, More Information Reviewe• by : Title : 4,,j,t CO( D1 Date : 0 l FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : iMiol9®9, Comments due : //i2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHIECGKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 1/I - 9/ APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : KOepj,h + HO(ggV,Ck de Q g7L PROJECT TITLE Sly' OVAL (Wa.fAin 011;;Chnicam./ G ia" ) Brief Description of Project : Peep 12SE-44ee '(Vapie Skeezies.®0®p pfe lb Ole igej eg'S QisAfinestfeerh Or ir®o-/ !L/21vAC osinq. LOCATION :(4 Sideee AtwellAge•Sk SOSA .5146, 7j 57 SITE AREA : * 3. 06®tveF BUILDING AREA (gross) . 94 2t ge, DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : Ere% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :1S 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wager & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends CITE ) : traffic impacts : 2/ -s'c/ e)7X ' //a7,76 14 ) Public services : 1 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aes'thetics : 19 ) Recireation : 20 ) Arc;heology/history: COMMENTS: Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : g44 Title : /mar e_ate/f Date : fr/6''Z FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Aala7/49 Comments due : // 140A.. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - I/( - APPLICATION N o (s ) . ..9Q,—/O!-9I PROPONENT : Keen . Ho/wick de. Re 1 PROJECT TITLE : $ pPRavA (G1 w J NTcc iCal Goodtd Brief Description of Project : Ref ue hica 10. Str „6ldr•(/6Vo ITC 4b le used QS a o i/t'fS r• or r i /1 rtec r+rl Gin isIs LOCATION :WS/Ao'e &jell Ave.Sid SouW eT set)7ta $7 SITE AREA : # 3.06ac MLS BUILDING AREA (gross) "t S/470gq DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 47 3' % IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : Y 5 ) Animal life : v 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Eney : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 1•//18) Aestietics : 19 ) Recreation : 4// f 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : ® Comments due : //MIS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVVIEW SHEET ECF - !,( - APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : Koeri" , fi 1v'tic de. e1* PROJECT TITLE ° g A tki iseDehim'Cod idbr) Brief Description of Project : Pei(*e locale ei -4o 4/d 099,22 3 Pie lb t aced er Aporeop irk or fop-/,yA isect re Acto_cmv° LOCATION : side of FLA h 5001 Be set 7tti 5 SITE AREA : * 3.Oe4111‘1,ef BUILDING AREA (gross ) t '47ig4 DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) : b IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality: 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plalnt life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : c/ 7 ) Licht & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings :C 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : r/ traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : c/ 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : I' Title : c,,'re__ .Ln5 , Date : /2-3 9/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : ®oc[a17®9i Comments due : 445/49A, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - // - g/ APPLICATION No (s ) . 91 PROPONENT : Kee T_®1vlciC de eV* PROJECT TITLE : cr ouAL (1AltsAin Je ni'ech Aece /G4' ) Brief Description of Project : PeetVl he (Va —sir alty,'6'd®1 5 14e 1 It use) as Q ine rb Or 6 8"1!' A reA 0oswt j LOCATION :WSideoehtwelI4Ye• 5OV,IAe-cS4/7t 57 SITE AR A : t 3. Oatvee BUILDING AREA (gross ) V4 74994 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (°o) : 4 30;16 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Diiect/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Rik of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Nurrtber of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Enrgy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Hurran health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Arheology/history : COMMENTS : L s s u-F 7-L-F' .,.-s- R-j v w• a-' m K T. P e c,—e TI.•z>L c, p SPc Er ra / rn y vv a v c'f ' C .. v"7" y • Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Revieweld by : Title : Date : 1LZ i FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : d a9V78, Comments due : 4/5/49X.. EINWIRO\ 1EINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - /1, - 9/ APPLICATION No (s ) . oi-9I PROPONENT : Koer ,h WVAdC. Rediet' PROJECT TITLE •61.1-Apts) . Brief Description of Project : P!'v/td docadei,t si ,6«'g•a6/t2ah LOCATION :W.Sideof Awe II4 e•Sid 5ouWia(54J7 5? SITE AREA : f 3.06dLeveS BUILDING AREA (gross ) t ` le/lege DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : :? IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : m 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Liht & glare : 8 ) Laud Use ; north : east : south : . west': Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : xxx* 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : See comments attached that were made. on the Springbrook Tech. Center in the dame area. Recommendation : DNSI DOS XX More Tnformation_ Reviewed by :rid! & PerssonTitle : Date : 1/q/R9 FORM: ERC-06 OF: Re h n O THE CITY OF RENTON U 4, ,4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 v BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR o POLICE DEPARTMENT 9A HUGH R.DARBY, CHIEF 04" ZO SEP MQ MEMORANDUM TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers . . : was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placementof outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, ' and locks.; Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. At the present time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7th and Hardie that is unbelievable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore; it is my suggestion that this development not be allowed until : 1) There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued .on this project. HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Date May 17, 1982 To: Mr. Roger Blaylock CITY OF RENTON Attn. : RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER We are transmitting herewith: 1 copy of plat certificate for Washington Technical Center Remarks: Very truly yours , HOLVICK deREGT KOERING By a.... For your approval: n Davis For your records :X . As per your request: Approved as noted: As per instructions: 51818WestlakeNo._#308 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 284_99 1 J PI(' R NATIONAL TITLE INSURANI 719 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 A- 280436 PLAT CERTIFICATE UNIT 18 PROPOSED PLAT OF: Washington Technical Center. Bush, Roed ' and Hitchings 2009 Minor Ave. E. Seattle, Washington 98102 ATTN: Bob Roed REFERENCE IS MADE TO OUR CERTIFICATE FOR PLATTING. UNDER THE ABOVE NUMBER, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT NOTED ABOVE. THIS LETTER IS TO ADVISE THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN RECORD TITLE TO THE PREMISES HEREIN COVERED SINCE THE DATE SHOWN BELOW, BEING THE DATE OUR PREVIOUS CERTIFICATE FOR PLATTING. DATE: November 16 , 1981 at 8 :00 A.M. EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: Legal revised as attached. First Half real property taxes are paid. cc: City of Renton Mr.. Davis THIS CERTI ICATE EXTENDED TO May 14 , 1982 at 8 : 00 A.M. PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE AUTHORIZED SIGNATargs.-----4E2. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SECTION 13, AND OF THE NORTH ONE4ALF OF SECTION 24, BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. , 1 , AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 83 OF PLATS, PAGE 10, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 88°15 '0u" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE NORTH LINE OF EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 88 OF PLATS, PAGE 80, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 854 .43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 1 °14 '28" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 AND ITS SOUTHERLY1EXTENSION, 1711 .42 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY (NOW BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. ) RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 77°27 '30" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 849 .28 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET WESTERLY FROM (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AN EASEMENT FOR PERMANENT DITCH AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AS DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR' S FILE NUMBERS 6587316 AND 7203290496, RE-RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR' S FILE NO. 7301180480; THENCE NORTH 11 °34' 46" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WIAY LINE, 1251 . 15 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID' CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 536 .69 FEET TO A POINT OF . TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 73°04 ' 46" WEST 515.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASEMENT FOR PERMANENT DITCH AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION; THENCE NORTH 89°04'3u" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 187 .52 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 422 .96 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 491 .95 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 22°26 '02" WEST 282 .94 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 627 .46 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFI ; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 305 .25 FEET TO THE NORTWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT 27 , 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL - MAPS RENTON SHORELANDS; THENCE NORTH 41 °16 '07" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT 27 A DISTANCE OF 316 . 18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°56 '01 " EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 27 A DISTANCE OF 130. 08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°54 '02" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 27 A DISTANCE OF 354.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72°3.7 '52" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 458.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°22 '22" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 24, SAID 2ND SUPPLEMENT MAPS RENTON SHORELANDS 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 °17 '25" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 17.1 . 17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°21 '32" WEST ALONG THE BEAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 24 A DISTANCE OF 387 .32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33°07 '25" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 154.51 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH 88°15 '00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 2261 .42 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH 1 °O1 '27" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 610 .05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 pF RA, A. 46 THE CITY OF RENTON z POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 O g;MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055. 9A go. 09gTFD SEP E 6 February 5 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR David Schuman First City Equities 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4040 Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REZONE APPLICATION ADJACENT TO SPRINGBROOK CREEK Dear Mr. Schuman: Pursuant to our meeting of February 2, 1982, with Mr. Ed Sullivan of Holvick DeRegt and Koering, this letter is to summarize our findings. First, in order to consider the rezone application, the 17 acres required for the P-1 Channel system must be dedicated by separate deed document or by the recording of the proposed final plat currently in our offices. Second, a summary of the findings of your engineering staff regarding the storage capacity within the 17 acres as compared to the required storage from the HDK site should be prepared. Once the dedication of the property has been completed and the summary of the flood storage solution has been provided, this department will be prepared to recommend that the rezoning of the remaining 25 acres within the Washington Technical Center project should be approved. As a practical matter, we would strongly recommend to the Building and Zoning Department that the application be accepted at such time as the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the final plat to the City Council, subject only to the receipt of the flood storage summary. As we also discussed, we can consider your rezone application as an amendment to the prior application so long as we can obtain fresh documentation and application forms so that the record will be clear and concise. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Very ruly your. , ka/2 a660. avid R. Clemens Policy Development Director DRC:cl cc: Holvick DeRegt and Koering Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator I r F R c to z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORz 0l, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 99055 235-2540 t1? EO SEi'I January 6, 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mike Selman Project Manager Holvick deRegt Koering 1 Oakmead Terrace 1230 Oakmead Park, Suite 210 Sunnyvale, California 94086 RE: WAShIINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER Dear Mr. Selman: Persuant to our telephone conversation of Monday January 4, 1981, there appear numerous issues to be resolved prior to the actual filing of the final plat and approval of site plans for the buildings in Washington Technical Center. The firm of Bush, Roed, and Hitchings has been working on the preparation of the final plat, while the firm Lance Mueller Associates has been working on the specific site designs. As a result of unanticipated delays resulting from the issues of bonding and natural flood storage, the submission of the final plat to the Hearing Examiner by our office has been delayed. Regarding the final plat, two issues remain. First, the fact that the Valley Parkway, if dedicated, would require full improvements or bonding at this time, and secondly, the issue of removing natural flood storage capacities from the subject site. The first issue may be resolved on the face of the final plat. Both the Public Works and Building and Zoning Departments will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the right-of-way adjacent to the Tracks A and B be acquired by easement, for utilities and future roadways. The Land Use Hearing Examiner does not have to concur with our recommendation and may subsequently recommend to the City Council that the right-of-way, be dedicated and bonded. The Public Works Department agrees with the concept of allowing replacement of the natural flood storage eliminated in that area that will. be dedicated to the City of Renton for the P-1 detention basin. However, the applicant needs to submit a specific proposal on how it would accomplish the replacement of this natural flood capacity prior to the City agreeing upon a specific wording to be placed on the face of the final plat. King County has already acquired a fill and grade permit to construct the detention basin between the pump station and SW Grady Way. Any construction done by your firm' in this area must correspond to those approved plans or your firm must. acquire"a separate special permit for the excavation that you would be conducting. r• MI E SELMAN TANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE TWO The processing of the final plat and subsequent site plan approvals become complicated in the actual sequence of steps to be taken. The site plans as submitted by Lance Mueller Associates do not specifically follow the final plat as proposed. The site plans show common curb cuts and accesses along property lines. This is specifically prohibited by Section 4-2204.2A.1 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the City of Renton. This requires that the \curb cut be a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line. A specific variance request would have to be sought by the applicant to allow this. This is not an issue if the site plan approvals were granted prior to the actual review of the final plat by the Hearing Examiner. However, if the site plans were approved in this fashion and the final plat was then processed to the Hearing Examiner it is probable that the Hearing Examiner would deny the final plat because it could not meet this section requirement. Therefore, we would recommend that the final plat be processed first with the site plan request following along with the appropriate variance request to this section. In addition, the site plans as proposed suggesting major modification from the original intent of the development under First Cities Equities, the railroad spur, which was anticipated to be focal point of this development,' is no longer functional because of the location of the buildings. It is not even identified on the site plan and appears to be in direct conflict with the proposed parking scheme for the buildings. The Environmental Review Committee has conducted their preliminary review for the site plan approvals and is very concerned about the limitation of the development in respect to the approved EIS. The original EIS only considered a maximum Of thirty percent (30%) office in the total development. The proposed buildings to the designs suggest that a greater proportion of the buildings could be used as office than originally covered in the EIS. The building design suggests that somewhere between sixty and seventy percent could be utilized. for office space. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee must request a traffic analysis to consider the theoritical maximum of the new building design. If there is a significant deviation from the existing EIS, a supplemental Draft EIS will have to be published, circulated and a Final EIS prepared before any hearing on the site plans. We would recommend that the processing of the final plat be completed prior to the processing of the site plan. This may delay the ultimate date of construction, but it will forestalls technical and possible legal difficulties in reaching the final product. If we can be'of further assistance please contact me directly at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Adminstrator cc: Bob Roed, Bush Roed and Hitchings Bob Fadden, Lance Mueller Associates Receipt # 5 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE /cc- PROJECT & LOCATION /A 1/11':, 1%:" t.'7 Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total 1 r 171 h 1/4. I + 1? 11' r" 15 9 I Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee 0 ;"Vt TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. LANCE MUELLEpak irAti 1CDF QIRM ATD"P-ASSOCIATES/ARCHI S 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. December 21 , 1981 Roo) 325-2553 ATTENTION RE: TO ,City of Renton SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER Planning Department Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON r) CE 11 II fFC211981 GENTLEMEN:BUILDING DEPARTMENT WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION 8 Buildings 16 through 19 submittal Al - General Site Plan, A2 - Site Plan, A3 - Building Plans & Elevations ( 16 - 19 ) , A4 - Building Sections, Cl - Grades & Storm Drainage, C3 - Profiles & Specs, Ll - Landscape Plan. ame as ove x Super-K ) . Application - Site approval Environmental Checklist Form Attidavit of Ownership THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested El Returned for corrections Return-corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Other copies transmitted today as follows: Set of Prints 81/2 x 11 HDK - attn: Mike Selman 1 2 Koll - attn: Dave Fitch 1 1 Eng. N.W. - attn: Jeff 'lillson 1 1 B.R.&H. - attn: Ron Goldy 1 Earth Ent. - attn: Jim Yamaguchi 1 First City Equities - attn: Loren Davis 1 McCaulay, Nichols & Maitland - attn: : Art Wahl 2 Security Pacific Mortgage Corp. - attn: Herb Cutler 2 Pacific Northwest Bell - attn: Lee Pennock 1 Puget Sound Power & Light - attn: Frank Hyatt 1 Washington Natural Gas - attn: Terry Wolfe 1 COPY TO SIGNED: FORM 240-2-Available from/nE siinc.,Groton,Mass.01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify,u at o ce. / l..l 1 T or ti L. I U11 APPLICATION SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE LSE ONLY File No. ,51y Filing Date ApplicatFilingFee $ Receipt No. Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Phone 1-408-736-8533 Address . 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210, Sunnyvale, California 94086 2 . Propert location S.W. 7th, and Powell Ave. S.W. , Renton, Washington 3. Legal description ( attach additional sheet if necessary) { See Site Plan IT a"•R-'tea a ill BUILDING DEPARTMENT 4 . :Number of acres or square feet See Site Plan Present zoning MP 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? BUSINESS PARK G . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scaleexistingstructures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' II, PalCing , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building - height and area (existing and proposed) 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed" Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dipt Rev, AFFIDAVIT HOLVICK .deREGT & KOERING,. .a. California. corporation, declares that it is the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief . Subscribed; and sworn before me this 9th day of November 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of California;', County of Santa Clara. _ _ h r— Name oil NcYtary Public) Signature o Owner 5 Palo Alto Square, Suite 101 IMgMissest MruuaMMMunMMMM1111M1Mu1MMMMMMMMMMMMnMM Address) MARY JO ALDERSON I r*:- NOTARY PUBLIC—CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN SANTA CLARA COTTNTY My Commission Expires July 25,1983§ Palo Alto, California IIMM DfIMMIBDDD190 MAS111m1isDiYtd®9UMYDDu C 1 t y) State) 415) 493-0111 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by m, and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules c 1 •- ons of the Renton Planning Department vi governing the f . o u Ycation .• Date Received DEC 2119B1 19 By : BUILDING DEPARTMENT Renton Planning Dept . 2-7.3 CITY OF RENTON, 'WASHINGTON ,• • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM l At!7 ' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEC 2 1, 19B1 Application No. Ci''-f Environmental :Checklist No. • ,E? ///1, Uet f PROPOSED,' date:FINAL, date: 7137ARIThA74. 1:'. ' ' . 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS:i Introduction The State"Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires, all .state and' l,ocal governmental agencies to consider environmental values both- for their • own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that. an EIS be prepared. for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of th_e, environment. ' : The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a . , ' proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with'. the informat,ion, presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are' required,.-or where you believe .an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in ,the space provided, or use additional pages if,. necessary. ' You, should include references to any reports or studies ,of which you are aware. and 'which are rele_' : ..- vant to the answers you provide. , Complete answers to these questions now will' help all agencies involved with your proposal• to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary :delay. I The following 'questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are, currently applying or the •proposal for which approval is Sought. : Your' answers' should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, .,. even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will 'allow all of the agencies which will be" involved to complete their environmental review now, with out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This' is a 'standard form being used by. all state and local age'ncies' in the State-•' of Washington for various types of proposals. ' Many of the questions may• not apply to your proposal . , If' a question does not apply, just answer it "noil and continue .on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1: Name-of Proponent HOLVICK deRFGT 8 KOFRTN(; 2. Address,: and phone number of Proponent: , 123Q.:Oa.kmead Parkway Suite 21:0 unnyva .e, a i ornia 6 3: Date Checklist submitted 4. A enc re uirin Checklist9y" q g City of Rentnn 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Springbrook Technical .Center - Bldgs. 16 throb 19 6: Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but' not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that, will give an accurate .. • understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of 4 .one-'story tilt-up concrete buildings for "'a total square footage -of 40;708. The usage of the buildings will be of a business park of light warehousing nature. The buildings are being constructed as empty speculative shell structures. • i, 1 1• '',',t,` I 1,I r,` 1 ;,, 7. Location ,of p. ..0,,s physical he .proposal , 'as wellal (describe the h sical set.: .. `of , t a^'•'' ' ;^r'".: 1 .,;,;;•,+' .,, , • as ;the extent of the land area ' affected by any environmental: impacts , ' inc,luding;,I . ij • _any other information needed to give an of; the 'environ-'•,,LI" " mehtal raccurate-Understanding setting of. the proposal ) ,' r i :'• I' The 'bui l di n s are located i n an 'existingstin businesspark area' '` esent,',r° " 9 9 The' pre a site' is nearly level The, surfacegrass r\'' h i s covered: Si gni f cant 1tre G. ''''' where ossi bl e'.• :. i> • y r;,,,., ,y' zr will be' retained p 1 n. Vi:' + i. r r f`..' ",.. I;I` r .ri`I r,. .., <<iyy+•t';i:);An 1 Ir yf,,: l'.. •'I. r 1 ;,'. r 'i,!r i4.;4,;r ,(y.'' .'a ,'yal il.ti,ti't; r . ,A ,.r}. ''i: I,s. ,I., rl r I,'i'';a;,` 11-'':4, -1tm :S'i..:jiy.}.+.s+:ys"'i.1 r r r q1 . . ,•, i. ;i. e; .!,, ('{-e, I. •.%7 .f%. Estimated• completion of .the proposal . j: .:;' '!8. date for i i Fa1'1:, 1982 9.,. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals, required.,;fpr the proposa federal , state and local -including rezones) Flood Control - King County Hydraulics' Building, Zoning, Sewer, Water, Storm Drainage', 'Electrical ,'.''Mechani'cal City 'of 'Renton. ..• Final ;plat application in progress at' City''of Renton under Earlington industrial Nark: , 10. Do you 'have any lans fo•r, future additions , expansion', br further 'activit related„to or; connected with this ' proposal? If'yes',!:explain: Yes.. Additional park'' development will occur later, I,; See existing draft E.I.S. f 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect 'the proper'ty',.cOvered by,<r.,;, your proposal? If yes, explain. i. 12. Attachany application form that has been i i' i: ' : . '•'':, r ,.',". T r;'yothercomp'l eted 'regardi ng'.'the 'pro•-";; '.N:-' r posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected..t '.be'r,filed'''atsome:`:rfutu,re, - ',rh date, describe the nature of such a lication' fortn: ' `1' 11 NnNF h : II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are:.requi red) '';`; ;;, ! 1) Earth. Will the proposal .result in: .. • I. 1 l a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geollogic t.' , ;,„i:,..;,,',! substructures? I,i'fi:,' r,!`•";, r;,r,,l,,'t'L, +.' X., ;;, r 1,,1r YE' - MAYBE f',:';t,'°"ii„',; :> b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over=' ' '. i ' :. ' ; 4i' j covering of the soil? PI y ! YES + MAYBE NO c) Change in .topography or ground surface relief 1 1( •; .,• i'features? r Y1 I'MAYBE ' A' , d) The 'destruction, covering or modification 'of.any ' '`''', '' ' .*,.' 1 " unique geologic or physical features? ' Xr ': s: r. 1, Or water erosion 0 sO h,;!,:,' rih,' i;;''`. ne) Any increase in wind r.f iHls'r, ',I,,,; t r.,.,;1''";`i:,, •r ;,:,,'.:,1!1; ,r;};.,',;a'.;;,.,. either on or off the 'site?' I li ii, ' '' yj,' l,,': XI:: ,` •;c`,,;,.;'i 0PiES ,, ;,MA BE ; r ' r_ it ,, L'" , ' ,;,,d ,,;ry'i,, "', i!!r,;'" r r f) Changes in deposition or erosiona ;• o I;'/,,+,;: r,'.:of beach sands r+ `'i changes in siltation, deposition or erosion ,whichi' '1' '','Ir'!;I:1•u';;,Tr ;,,'I;;,r..,. ;' •. .',; may modify the channel of a river or stream; or.,'thel ,' I'1''''1 'i3!',;1 1i!: III„t , ir !r,,, I ( r l:4irl?„ bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or 1 ake? I.l 'i'''d >r;,; ;,:f:'°':` X''' k.. 4"', :..rr ,MAYBE -, Explanation. r I' , 1;,:F,i',,.''•r,.' •p. `' l c) Some filling will occur to bring building 'pads. to.min `floor 'elevation. • d) 'Site will be graded for drainage, F .. ': h, .'`'' ` ,•!, ' • 'iP ji;'" C( t4 ' I• r r I, i t:4.,, AI) 2) . Air. Will th_ rroposal result in. 1 a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air Xquality? ST M YB NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X MAYBE 0•.:. . c,)' Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, • , ; , ;,II' or any change in climate , either locally or regionally?X Y SS MAYBE NO' '. , Explanation: li it a.;(' 3) Water. Will the proposal result in. i, S , 1,,;, :,; , , •" ;; .,I'.•'z ;•;' a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction'` of 111i.u`M;', water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X ' i YES ' MAYBE N0• b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X TES— MAYBE .ZO , cl__ Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES : M YMB NO • , Ild) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE ' NO; ' e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? 'X YE MAYBE ' N(T f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . X j YES MAYBE NO _ , g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either" . ; ;i'H'r•{;',:'; ';, through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 1`4'' • ' X YES .': MA BE. . NB' h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, ' , ' phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, Xorothersubstancesintothegroundwaters? TEST TiTCTETE F ' • . i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE 07. Explanation: (b) A complete drainage system will be designed. ' c) Normal building usage of water will occur. ' 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in. a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers' of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass ;' crops , '`' r ; ' '''" j''' microflora and aquatic plants)? i MAYBE irr..'" .'' b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or;' endangered species of flora? ' X' ES, " ,MAYBE i (c) Introduction of new species of flora •into an `area, or !i .1',: 'r ' in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing " '`' '"" species? R MAYBE. FI d) Reduction in acreage of any 'agricultural crop? :';r, •• , 1-1,, ,ili. 4 MAYBE a) Some existing trees will be 'removed.'!'.',1' y'',''"'`' ` •• • Explanation. r,.,;.i;i`r c) New landscape materials will be introduced-.- I''i , 4- 1 . :1, 5) . Fauna. „Will the proposal result 'in: j : '' 'a) Changes in the diversity of 'species , or numbers of 7•';.,:; i any• species of fauna' (birds , land animals including t .l reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , ' insects or mi rof i•,. ':il.' I'• F MAYBE 707:,. 1;::+' .,; b).• Reduction of the ' numbers of any unique, rare or . ,r , . . ' . ,k-1;,.}; endangered species of fauna? X', ! YES "'j1 MABE ;NO '. ::3 ;' p c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, ' J `; :' or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X • ..,''of fauna? . VET' MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X eE M YB 'NNO '. '' Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal 'increase existing noise levels?. .X . DES; • MAYBE NO I I'I' '''i il. Explanation. New vehicle activity will occur. ' I 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X4,. AYBE ABA Explanation: On-site lightingwill be installed, ' 1' ;a j•,, 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X ' I MAYBE i•H Explanation: I • 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in;,,:, :.,.. _ I 'I''H'. a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural' resources?' " ___ %' S;r MAY BE'.r N10` '' i I, ,. il.' {'; ! f. I.7,';.,..('•aid( b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? I'j' 'IX :;:' i;, :';';.;;;i I' YES, MA BE „NU, ,.;;.. ,I Explanation:Natural materials will b used during the hn;ldin . construction process and during building operation; .' ' A,; ` i.. F ,• 1 F n' Ff ' I •' 1 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including' ',: •' but not limited to oil , pesticides , chemicals or;radiatio!) i n the event of an accident or upset conditions?'4,...L• . ,•;,'I X . r:!4;''' C! ,;'r ;',1',I„' 'y:: I Y 1IAY•BE,''Al `°;: 4+I i' 'l. I'ni i1;. ,. ,{'r,'1r1 p'.„}; 1`v.4';jri,;Y;r V~t q,`•"h,: Ex_planation: I''•j ;'1:1 ;`i,1,,.,'C; r•: r , I ' F y;l' it '' ! '.,, •J'1h i I'•,"I!':•il;l'i•'(.,',j. i9i•` ;;,, r(, y,. ,, I nif;r24' I 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the locatio \,, dist°,i=,W,j,'it'!;1''<:•'' '.;".i:. ,` 1 '; Ibution, density, or growth rate of the human population .,' 1,4r.04,, ` X of an area? II. II'i,' ' r" .., fi,.i;f'2.it•,'',';';.•;,,r,'r:.: I, MAY SE Explanation. L 'If ',,' ',i '•'.il,dj,,i,,.,q:,p( ,1'I,, V 1. 1', •;' ':,+! , 1. , '' a"17 u S',S1rt;i;I.. IN':•i1'' l. p ',',1'.'':;!',' 7 • I, r. !' y.i 1;.• L.ir.;. li;t'l f.: .:J I'',;'kr;';'•'l}.,, ,J, ,;:k J}" ry';',;'dj I 'IJ' i'i" '1 i, 1 1,•, p••%1'. y .'81i6p .. 'i k' ary l.l ra,;. l :': u i:+.{; 1'"'r `} i, 1,}' .s ticw -I!` ,,,, 'i Iw :'•.,,:'.1 ._':I' 4 Ili'-I, fa•' 1.,. lot, V r 12 HousTiing Wil i `' ro Deal affect exilstin hou o 1 x' r;,d:;. :.,, , ,1F'` create a'''dema o,r additional 'housing? i i':X i;;x',a'?.'d 1 :i,l J:, 1' ilv14:- ' i', ,',P'i'`:Je,f''.',f,.a,,IAh:,:',, l,, 1';' ,I" •'0. • Explanation Work force will come' from existing. population 'base'; -.'.''''•'"'` '°'''',''' III '1'j„' I:', , , Ir....1 ir,l„ .:.;' i• „ :,,. ,'t.l.i:.r_'-.I.,,:. 1. 1,,,.. 'sly ' , ', ,,!;i•.,-,.,,;-1 s::'7t 13) ':',Transportati on/Circulation' Will the •proposal resu'),,t in ;;'; '11'. ''"'`'' `:' ;I..' '.,:; ` '?` ai) ' Generation of additional vehicular movement? X• i'''.`' '' 1' b:) Effects, YES MAYBE NOA on existing parking facilities , or demand A j for new parking?X YES . MAYBE c,) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X 1 MAYBE N h- 11 i.,r,4I ,„i Y ,'' it ri',.d Alterations to' resent patterns' of ci rcul ation' or...,. )'1',1, ,1,1••.1.!0;,' '. a,';,,,, ,,;,,,,,;,,,•,, .:;';,;;;,.',;:, movement of people and/or goods 1. t X' 'I'':,'+;:;'``;1 °1v', x ,1, K , Ir:,MAYBE '' .';,a•,",',>a;.!;,',',. fir a r.r, e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X'•!';''''' " YES,,'I,II MAYBE NO f) 'Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,. bicyclists or pedestrians? X ; ' ICE ' MAYBE f.. : j• • Explanation New businesses will generate new traffic 'movements and - ":, ',—`` arequirement for parking. See Draft E.Z.S. ' 14 Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or '..,,., result in a need for new or altered governmental . services, ', in any of the following areas .r;''; ' a) Fire protection? i, 'r; i:r1'''''.'X, ; ;: I Yam5 , •MAYBE' N :!,..:'.::'.;, '{ b) Police protection? X ;i'';1: r: r,.ftF'rP.'!:,!t't.,,.;,, i', FI 1' 1 6t;";,` du, „s;,'^'L; x' c) Schools? x;::,: ri1 ,r; , r,rite, ;,I ,r:}li. yr{id',iP r pi,;;,fItiq,'1, h".vj,,. ,.',,,.,,.,r. 'X,.1',`'y.,=•ifnls'):•,.n%< r°i;i'„irGd t1r:, A BE>:' Yl d-i'L;7,4'`il. E;r Yil,i,.i •Its 7.,, 7{a„, .•,;',:;111"'.j 'J g`',.,ii' r'r,: d Parks or other recreational fac•ilities? 1,;; ' ',i..' .'•'''"`" '' i' fffl• " Iit '': g5:1,''';MAYBE' :;NO;;•1'' ',.. ;;,r,'' r.'Fi le) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads7 , , .,.,;,'1X'' ' ' .;. ,.• 'i•;..r;'•s. If) Other governmental services? ; s:; i•E {';'.MAYBE ( ; :;' L! ' 1 Normal publicc tn i'"'- Explanation. i services will be required. r • ; ; i. ..,, t,;.,.;,, ll:.t1 . 'r.' f '1 i .: , • 1 15 Energy. Will the proposal t • 1„,•;,,.rr 1 ;>. ,;'i,i': •, -'::j',:4,. r :',' P posal result .I n 1;'i'i ,,.0f1' '.a{,j"ai,:ri"t,. t: yltl'g-r„-,.,. i.i".1..;'i", p: is • J }(. .li.,,`, i.it:.i i,d,;F 17N j i''p'a'.F Ia) Use of substanti al amounts of fuel or energy?;i l;t'I••• i;;.:'_ ," ::r -. 4, , ` i^ ; ^` ' JI , r:;: tat B ',R; 0; •;:, - 'i. I S' II tf/f1'+c., '4': 4f; o,,tr.pF:i;7,r °{,('iJ, ,{, ,ua,4 y,j( .:1,•,-'``r'{' w•F'I •i d,: 1, d.rj;,l,"'r' •i„, f' ;t ip,,,!ta4., ,;?, -•'ir1'.,1i,i..a':J+.,ty? :•.,;, ;: gib) Demand upon existing sources of energy o requ re'f t ,''.,t. `'" „' '' "'' t r ti i r,.'„ `• i;-, i' ys;Es'•;''•',lv )'p;l:t: .h ica;; iu nt(" t,, the development of new sources. of energy?i; ''' 'L XI;IIb. / ' w's'„ b) Newpower service to the ark will• be'`required.. a,, ¢`Explanation. I ',' 11f'j +',i I n_ 'li, !. ,,,, • t f{,yr tl i`f1,,r,,, 1t.,t 5 ,,1( P ?,7atr al , + I I a <, Jld i,+',:. n' 4 { /! 1 f 1h< i# l/ + J o „a11,0 „ifr,;•.. 1 a ', '7 i, t S r ' r',:" A {Va l°,,,'"I' t, l r, !' f. 1 16) Utilities.;' Will 'the proposal result',in a need for iewf ` y' ,,;p,,KJ, t, l, {, ,''; } ',drr Systems, or alterations' to the followl g utilities 1,k,':i.i 'riv,4i'}Z0 'J`°P`''{"i;'',j` '^ F; "°,•l4+h,i•„r, ' 4 .F7''r' ; W5',}r :tii ;:{ r. ,',';r' ,•l:*vi. a,' ,;u S;^,', r -„ 0,—.... (i;6 ,d' •F;ni ,l1 ':`r-+L- ,„:,,,:'. T,f'.:','r, s,... 4 •;: k,7,It-:,.ra) Power or natural 'gas? ' I;'''.1'-,r, ,,,'•( ,self},,I,I4; t iI'Lr' N,V..,,u U.';.. rw, , :', r::i i,; t I 1 a yl" ;, 1'Y. 1 b'yq' f"fl6it''. t •.':,j,' J. i I{) ,,,'l N-rE'IS. Xy,;<;;, r7..'il,.S.cl4, 1 ,; t,,., ,`',.',( b) Communications systems?r 41,.. I' MA BE • N0i,:,y:,;i'.',er.!3' i("iti?sfjl !37r'iE ti I:'{,L r Y; il'. 1tF.lf'' i''ll;'4'a,°%r:; i , ,., Water? d 3;.X'h1I!,:'.,.•' ...,,i' 'j:: ,;r :;,;'•, YES;.,,,:.'•MAYBE :',,i:, ,,. i `,'i r'I +' 1'i 1 1 j,,',.! 1• ''''',..' i•....1 ‘ . Azie, '' .' 1''' ' ' ' '''' I'',.-..c•z , -3•••,;4. .,:'•':i••.:,. 11,i: .,'•'..,. n'•,-', •,,,,—;.. 1-,..:,1,','''..:',..?'''.•t'; ':::::. ,..,-, ,,:,,,,.,..,-.•,..‘•,..-:.- cr:-,,;•,•'., • c7i-F...:•:,,i;•,.'.,','-/ 6-':'•".:,' 0: F.:::, :•T.:;;,,,i;•-.'14:0 i, • ,l'„..:.:',:cii,-7;;;PlLi...:5•;:-..,2.Y.,„.-•.f 4' ''''' '': ''':.'"','-•:"i.s1":•,•;:::;1:,...;,,i•:',.1:.::;'.,,',;',+,%...:•`,..;:iN,,,...Vr.,,,;4:;•,1•!1,.•1•,,!...,:,•41/.4;;•„1.:,„,,i,/;.,t.r,i,:.,-,!, J,..i:,•.::::-....--:•,: ::i:-.:;,•:..,. •,:::;::::., ,,,,... ,f.:„ :• : . .: : :,I,, : ' „ .- •-,,T.,:•:;,'.. •',',,1,4•1.')A''';',1'•'I 1•,':,I;i•ill;'•',•,,;,„•.'';i'„„•';, .11,,,,:ltil'sr,i+),'",,i7;,•••• p',:ife."'•4 it';;I•i 1•• •' • ' I , • ',I '••:' i ,,••'„ ..,.,;L, 'i•,',,Iri •,',,,,„vi;,,-,t• •.'„•.1• „',',,C//','..'(Alr'''ti'•;;•'' ‘','''±,•; 1 ;'..'•;•''.'•i'',Ii• .i ! •'" +'''•, ' '' • '' t.,'i',,:;;;:;"''' 'i'I .1;,''r, X ‘'j••!;:,''''.':';'•''',';•'. .' ',' ' '•.-:''.0V41'-'')•i;',..,'''';'t'C'kii',.'',.••75,,it (A).1.,1:-,.Sewer• or .:,.p tic tanks?'.. • •• ;, , , ' : t.. ".,. ''..'': • '..;;".... " '..... .. ..::.,...;41..,,,';',':•:..'...,,,'1".:;;;, i. ,..,,,.i.,, ,.,.... t: tr.t '- ...t-...'''- '; ; ' ' 2 •'.:: 1 '.' • . ''''.' • 1,.''.:',.+ ' 1.: -'•: ,; ,;,..Y ES -,-..,y1:.'MAYBE i.NO-q N-,ii17, 1":4,r,r• J'4", • i!'' :',,.'l.- r!:`i'1,',.•;•';1';if.,• 1:••• 1';!•:.:-,;,..::.•- 1;'•' d:.:1 ':'• •. '• 2.. .- '•"2-':• '-''1,;'... ' ' •'. '': •, • • . ..,;::•.•!,•,•i•.•':•-, 1!•••.;i••c•1.,i..,j:•!••,,ti'4,1•1...:,,.• 1-..l• •'"; ;•;:,-..,-.,',!;ig,.;•••-,),...,,,,,:••1.,,:i„r,,,,•:;,:: i: :• ,11,!T!:6''," •••' •::',r ,,V.I•N,".2.,•::;:! :. ' .•,•••t•,. !„tys,?,i1.'...fli,-.-:-x.-.., t"'(e)i."1.Storm water drainage? ' • : .11 ... '' • . i.:„..',!.....,--'' .,....,..,..;A•....:"',"•3•'.:.,' l• '%-:: •••.:••;'.-•'",•,',-f_t•,',:i''''r?'-'i.,...;i''''r r t• '.••........ ....' .r4.-".''..• ' .,. .. ' ••;•10i.<1J.,?..1.7,', '•LY r r;'i.•• . r .'',',:•,,‘'•v Es..,....,;.;.t4A y g E, t;ry 0„....'(.•4••;.:`;: •'$-,',,e,:•,•:),•••••, I•s''';,:'::'.''."';',?..'";"!' ';',•:: . i•,•:, -, ', ••., .,. .;•:-. . r,, :1,.,,.;,,,..1::A., 1 , ,•), ,,?%..-1•.-, ',:,' rr, g,,',"'c'.!'•••‘',,,'::qV•:.1-'•.".,' ..... *:',il''.,1 ;(f)H,Solid waste and disposal? - • ''.. .":,..,., . . • . .....,: . •...,.. •..,-,.•k .,,...07,....,:r. .,,..,.?...,' ,g,./47..,.K1,).1..:,,,,,,,4,g.. i•I' -.:,... t:,..'..:. •,,,,,,..,:,,,... -.'--- ‘, ...,....-, flv,,,ly,f,•:,....‘r.r. ..t.....,.'.1, V ,, .-.',.....,i',. -.; .. .,..,it. . •.;t ...,. ... • .. 1 :4, . . td.,' i',.i.,1,:, ,....;,•,•....',,,YES,,-i',;,;ITATiTt'..',.ti ,,,;i0};13,1iiiii;;r4,(.:ilq'el„,,f.,-jI ,; .. ,.. ,,(0,1`041 ,,, I,O.,1, 4,,00vo'n .4,4,..m1-,0c, ,,,,,,0,,,, Explanation:i.• Normal building hookups and willll.' beKreOui red:?....1,.•,i,.,6„riNA4 i :.:,1, f,',..,•,. ,,-).,,::,',,.,-,i.,,,j ,,I,e,.,Ii,.,• t.,,.-::.•,,,,,,,.,,,",,,,leplf.?e,,,,,p,tc.,,,,,,v,1:I.' ' .:- - "A,' --' , .1••• ,..•• ', .,... r,,• , I :,•- , .,',, • • " • ,.,•,..•:.),, I.,,i." ii •.?,,:•-.. f!..,",,,,-,,,,,v;',',[..--,,--:,L''• ,':,..'1;1,.414iSji li,e,,,C:'i,q,,..f.., 4 '. ' I . • 1' '11-;'' '',"". , ....'.%.' I.-".;.. . 1.'%''i''...','''•-' ‘','''''4\ 1.i-i.' " " ''•'. „!'-.%•".''...;, ....:,,'.:i.:','. ..'''• 4P4'S/•-t.,1qq..a..',.......'' 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of •''',i,', 1,,,,'.;;;;;;;',.. 4::. . ... . ' • •'..., ,.:......',,,....',.;.:'"" ;4:. any health hazard or potential ' health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES 4.! MAYBE TI07 ,-:. Explanation: • t.',' '. . I. . ,. . . ;,. ...;,..,....,,,,...... .',',:,'... t ,. :;,..... 1...,,,.., . t • .."...;,, i.•;'.;....•;,..,....‘..),... i' ., .,.1!•..,. • ' .... . ,' . .:,..:...1.::-..t.,•-•,):18) Aesthetics. Will .the proposal result in the obstruction of .'.':;''.i.t.',.','..'•,t ::•;:.••:.' ,..'-,....,',.,;.':'.t.,.;:,:•,..,,.. .''....., • any scenic vista or view open to the',public, or will 't. the '; ;'• -,..'H.;.-.t..'"..:.;:,C.:.: i. ..';...,',.."'.=';'4:,.f".'•:. ('''''';'.''', f':' 41,:. i•fl,;',•4••‘'''r%' ,'proposal result in the creation. of an aesthetical.lY .Offensive ,‘,,,.,.,..,..tr.i'.....'",. ,- ' '' A.,1-••• site open to public view? ..' , t';.'.... .X..,:ii,.r...:,1),",i'J''','-'f .1b.:.,•.1,• i.,, .... ,. '''Te-77;i....;RATTC ...:,N-0-744,.m,1:-.vi.......,•,,, 1,..,.: ,..,, . •: ..I0„y•-'„if: , -" :',',.:i..--,."'.'1:,,,4‘;‘,.i.,;,,!.,:•cm'.(:', Explanation: I • ;••-• .' • • .: r•,'"!..,",..', 1 ,•:' •., I I ,i"'..,'. •r{..1;,,,V. P•1"''' 1, 1 ll'''', ' I 1,.• r•i ii;„;;J'../-:'• ,. ' ". r(,;',14i,...."'N'e,,A)'s'P••rt%! r,., .., .. •1r;',";,',•;•r11););','.•,''';,' , 1 1. ':'''1'''''. •r •H.,''': 1' I.;!rr..1,:r.•.‘,11.••!,'.".'",•'1:!,:, 1',•::", ,`i''1,.‘.'irit•Or.‘11.'•'.'":':"' ii!",,•':........!'''',c•. 1 1 I:. i ....Yr'''. ' ''' . 4•I).:1:0•,& .r...'•1 s'.-.'''2: •liV61.• .ji. '''.-:;:•••..;19) Recreation. Will the proposal result :in an impact:upon thet.'i . .1..-...'v-ii.,,,,..,:er1.,CPii..:z.....1)Ai'V r.:t'ill'iT C:. •''):'r;','''•':',N.'"-r-',.,•,::';`9:,,.-..,c,A1:•..., quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?,..t..•t.A ,•,-.. !...,-,....,....f).,,,..i.40,: i'tt...,;.;4.:' t '', , " . P.. TE17.7.1111-i."'MAY BE . .-W(57,s4--.`;','.1',.:••.,'.?,4.:-,..'i. I it;,••:•rit.• ';..!..., .d:',- ,;',..'.,;,,;.••,.., '".1.,„,;•:.i....1..,,.......,.(„,,?......,,:.,1.t.(... 1',..,t(*..,;.;'.‘'.1.,i.',.i.."„.,:.".:-.'.....:',: :Y'.0';',4',4 'etv,;Y;'; Explanation Existing. Existing golf course will be closed;',- . ,,,, i..,0.- r 2o) Archeol ogi calfHi stori cal .• ; Will the proposal result in an •,..', H.•, ;,,,,,....,. , ...„, ,,,,..,,,.....F....:,;,•,. ,,,,..:,,,:,..,.,,,,, alteration of a significant archeological or historical ''. .i ' .'".,,:it :;.:A.,,;•;.1. •-;. ,,, :., ;',..i.,,4y,..,....,!,;;;;;',... ..,,r,..,., I site, structure,' object or 'building? .. - : , '..i'.'.. .;-,.:: '' :::,H0 ;'Ic.:''';?.:i.tr. ..,.'".j.- ... ''. ....;.."":" .?.1.,......t.. l'1;!;'..;..1'.'0''.4.''':.:.:.;,..TE5,74,•",,4.11Ay BE .;:... . 0!ii1.,;!,........,..7t;•;•,0. I'' '..';..,'. • '0 -- i.',-,,.1.':',t,,13.6t..... .........., ...,..... ,.,.i.'',...:,, ....,. y.. ' '.."' '','"...,...'4.;;. ,1..':;' .,,r.iii.,.:::...,...,,Expl anati on: '' • i..•...... ',,tt.-;.i...,,; li,..;,..,...1.....,.......,... i . . . , , r.,, ' , , , , , . ,... ..,; , , . , ';, ...,..,..,.ti,,„.,;',.iv,"...10 li....:1',.;il'yz..).4.t, i;01..,• ..„i,.;,.......,?;;,',..:::: 1''-‘'..,'1,i,t,4,.....'..:.1,..":'..• t; •„...: '„ . .. .t.,..,,y<:.'',....i.,:'..'..,...1,;'......,..,;',•,„1.. .,..,v.,t,,,I... ..4q.-..'4'..`"ft.v, ,'•;,..,".t, J.;:'''•.•:'''''' ' :• '',''' '':'' . ' i'''•,1",11'Y•1, 1*.ii:''',. 4,' Ir''.'\'‘:j PI:I.I.''''''';'';/(',;....1,1.•;,.!:.i''','%;"•AY'ilifirr.,1\1.' 11,1;',''';'.Ir'!,'"!.t.r.'7.'''''' '';'. 1.i'!:!in;;:ii:i. r.;''.1.(;4#4::;CI•rfr,f."?';,; 1');;;,.tr::'''::."1 I IMOMIGISMIIIIMIZAINNIMOZ...••0•0• 1V4,...i,ii,,''.,:.1 2,". :',:.:l. .H.,r'.•\'',;Z•44,4'..'"):::•1,'•,•'Y',' ,' 1! ,":''','',••,'', t•ii:4•45,:;!•••••;:4.i:.•';,.1 i,'.'.•• ..•.•::. •;,:c.'{",.,•,•:.;',•••(?..41.::::•,•,,:t:::i ..4-';.-, 41ft,-4,,,,i ..4-,`: :.••%1:.,:,,'.: ,.'.•,.••• ' :::••-•: ':'. :f:'•':.6"'',..:'• ,:.`• ' t;,,,,,,;1;•.?:,•,•.,,',•••-::: r,•• ''''''•'.'''...,of:'..r,•%":.?:', :;•),'",',: ",:',,•••',-;.:',.): p:i1',;,0,11',-,''''',"!'..;'-'17, III. SIGNATURE .. i',.'.',' ,,:,...,..,',. i''',:.':':itl'..';),:';,1,'N'f)f.:.....,'..,'11..... .';',;', ':-..', *.,;..',11'N'f,';',:;;;,":::', /".1 i.,, r.,:;,.,1%.,..,,,..,.r,,....-....,,-.?e•':1 i,•....'.rii...q4,,,,,,,,,I,•,r-,.. . 2 , I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my Icnowledge.'th'e ,abqye'linformation . is true and complete. It is understood that-the lead agency.may ration! of non-significance that it might issue in relianceApon' thistchecklist'should,,yi..7. there be any willful misrepresentation or willful . f.::ful I ., , closire ''on' ...my ,part.' . . , 4, ' . i • .'.;'J,..,:',..•.;! • 't. ' •.-,;,.' • ,....0' ,, t't. v 0,,,..t,:....;.4,..1... ' ' :''. 'l''''''"' ' .. '''"."'' Proponent: K.V.adlIrdeP7 - . .. 'i v.,0 t..;',,... .:,......-ov''',..ttOk.'.,1,;•,,.',,,i,•••',1,,,,,;'•1.4tr,.,.4, ci!;',:e,'',''':,.riseii,...,,...,P. ,..,,, ,, ,r., ,.,)4 „IA, ,t.,41. 1..h ••I . .' . • ' ',,',.• ; • • .. ' ,„ ,,. '•, , i,.. i ',,,, ,,i,.;',:',..!.,.,:".i•-,•„ •".. . .. ,, 0.,,,iiip,,il'.'';',101:.'!i''.,,,N.,1 let.t1/1;:tft,2'' ./•,(••').!i.f', . ,1.01,1411{.1,,,,,c,,,,,,,Wi f':': name P r'..!I 9 1.litt,',vii'l.':''..kV,k '--',V,ii.•-"-i;',,),':;,t1;'.,:f1.1.1,SIAii. Y.'.i.,,,,, ,,.-..,• .•• .. , .•,....,:.„, ,,,).40.•,, :.k, „......,:At.rp.gr.,V:•71:'..,"., r 1:••'',!1•.,•!: • ..', 1 , '.,'..r....6••'.4.',..P,'‘'Pet,P: :5j'e,V;i•f•rk',"P,:,„`'ZS 1..,:h.0', . j,' " v 1.,6,' •il,•1 • ' ' •Jii OC•11:.1A,,3.,-,,••-, r•, Pir,,,.,,..i, ,,, ,t, e,..,, 1/.1;-',e e,,..„-..-...-.,.c- , !..t .r,;,,:,:,„,,•,..,..!..,., ,.•,. I',.;•.•ii, r,.... - l'i.1,::,.;,,./;,.„.p,•Ai,.•.-,.,•,.,,,,,,.....;rriliv..,.::::,......,,,,. 1..'..',...,14-.,•„t' b,:,••••,;,',:i,•11.) '' ••• .'•:,•.•..,"•,•',-) ,;f)..",11:-..1,•}•;;,,,,';.',?•,,,'•,,,i: • • .:,1h'•::,.•,•..:•. .-. • , r, •.‘14 ' : 'l:),•,:,.,'•` ',",,1.'•;:,•,-,•,•,..:":::‘,..,.":'," -.'•• i i''','•••'••,'"••':''"'"‘i•i'',', .Plqr,-1.','1,:,. ..:.:.,:v.,f..:1,1,:1,-.1.:,i,,, 1,• . 1,.:'i;,,,2;•.' ",., ,•;•li',.•,•,"1:fl;,'‘',""-,•0•.; • ,,l','•,•' •,: :::''+ 1&,-)':" ,,:.:.: ,• r1;•."C i ty't'ot ,'Reriton.t!',..'`..;.,. ,...,,..,,i,...,,?...,•,.. ...,,. i Pl anni,ng;.8epart:aent ,,,, .',... ...,,:.,_,: 1 5-76 '.fi: . ''...ri.,11,-:,,i'..,•-',,.L.,,,:.,,,,, . ... •,. ,:. , 0 ,,.: , I. •i••.',,i,...:(,..1 ,. . •" '.'- ' • ', II I sING OF FILE FILE TITLE 11' 4 r f• 3 1.10