Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-061 (3)I did 3/27/83 Sunnyda l e, c, w 04' looking southwest 5/273 - Sunnydale, looking south x 3 lot.a. 1.- -.k. $.:. t -, lif . F• 3-' ARP M r' it a ` K 71r aSri N i t 5/27/03 - Sunnydale, looking southwest r. 6, 644 - t- ki: 5 l r • J •,yam +' 5/27/83 Sunnydale, a.' looking south 1 A 1 i7 -? I 5127/ 3 - Sunnydale, looking west imilll' .. J October 26, 1983 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: UNION AVENUE COMPANY FILE NO. V-061-83 LOCATION: West side of Union Avenue S.E. and adjacent to the southerly boundary of the existing "Leisure Estates" mobile home community'. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks variance from Section 4-2006, Part 1-D, Screening, of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance which requires a solid wall or view obscuring fence or barrier along the entire periphery of Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. Specifically, the request is to apply to the southern and western property lines and the south 210 feet of the eastern property line. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Denial. Hearing Examiner Decision: Denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on October 11, 1983. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on October 18, 1983, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following documents were entered into the record as follows: Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff report and pertinent documents relating to posting and publication. Exhibit #2: Site plan showing the specific variance location along the east, south and west property lines. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He indicated the applicant is seeking a variance from the provisions of the mobile home park ordinance requiring a minimum 5 foot screening, hedge, or solid wall around the perimeter of a mobile home park. The preliminary and final mobile home park plans were approved on August 9, 1983 and the project is presently under construction.. The applicant does intend to fence the area with a cyclone fence for security purposes, but because of the topography, and the potential and existing uses for the adjacent properties, the applicant has asked for the variance from the provision of making the fence sight obscuring. Mr. Blaylock pointed out the surrounding properties are: City of Seattle water pumping facilities which has a cyclone, barbed wire fence and is very heavily lit at night, and the southern edge is for a potential public street, to eventually become a north/south street connecting the Highlands area with Maple Valley. Further, Mr. Blaylock noted the property to the south is much higher than the property of the mobile home park and the City of Seattle's water pump station is located to the east. I UNION AVENUE COMPANY V-061-83 October 25, 1983 Page 2 The Examiner asked Mr. Blaylock what property rights the applicant would be denied by not granting the variance, noting the code requies there must be some deprivation suffered from not granting the variance. Mr. Blaylock indicated there would be no deprivation. The applicant can possibly request a deferral from the Board of Public Works for a period of five years and the Board of Public Works would then have the authority to grant a permanent deferral after that time period. Mr. Blaylock reported the staff recommends denial of the requested variance. The Examiner entered the following into the record by reference only: Exhibit #3 File PMH-045-83 Exhibit #4: File FMH-046-83 The Examiner then called on the applicant or representative for testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Richard F. Loman 9021 N.E. 10th Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Mr. Loman stated the applicant does not need screening at the locations noted by staff. He noted to the west of the subject site is a ravine, totally undevelopable and covered with trees; to the south is dense forest and no access to anything; the 200 foot area adjacent to the Seattle water pumping station is very nice and already open space with landscaping. He stated they do, however, need a cyclone and barbed wire fence, 6 feet high, for protection against vandalism. Mr. Loman indicated they could put up a five foot slat fence that would be difficult to maintain, would not keep anyone out and he does not believe it is in the best interests to do that. Further, he noted that when Leisure Estates was constructed, screening was not a requirement and he feels it is inequitable to create a financial hardship on the applicant for something that will not accomplish anything. The Examiner noted the cyclone fence is not attractive and there is a proposed roadway along the southern edge of this property and a slatted fence would work much better for screening purposes at that location. Mr. Loman stated they would move the fence at the time that roadway is developed. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none. The Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was: Ray Griffin 14306 - 144th S.E. Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Griffin stated he feels his concerns have already been expressed by the Examiner; that when the roadway does go in, there is developable property and he would not want to see this variance granted on a permanent basis because it would be detrimental to those who would buy and develop the property along that side. The Examiner called for further testimony in support, opposition; or any questions regarding ithis application. There was none. The Examiner closed the hearing at 9:30 and indicated his report and decision would be completed within 14 days. UNION AVENUE COMPANY V-061-83 October 25, 1983 Page 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Union Avenue Company, filed a request for approval of a variance from the screening requirements of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended, the subject proposal has been determined to be exempt from the threshold determination by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject site is located on the west side of Union Avenue S.E. just south of the Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. The site is the location of the Oakhurst Sunnydale Mobile Home Community. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City in June of 1977 by Ordinance 3143. The site was reclassified to T (Trailer Park) in November of 1982. A final approval of the mobile home park was issued by the City Council in October of 1983. 7. The applicant has requested a variance from the provisions of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance which requires screening along the periphery of the site, including along the subject site's property lines abutting public streets and abutting property not part of the subject mobile home park. 8. The subject site abuts the City of Seattle's pump station along the southerly 270 feet of the eastern property line. A dedicated public right-of-way abuts the subject site along its south property line, while undeveloped property is located along the western property line. The north property line abuts the Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Leisure Estates did not provide the screening necessary along its southern property line. The applicant will provide the screening along this property line. 8. The applicant contends that a ravine along the west will not be developed because of topography. They further contend that the southerly road will not be impacted by the development nor will the site be impacted by the road because of topography. The applicant proposes a non-screening chain link fence for security reasons surrounding the subject site. 9. Staff and a neighboring property owner testified that the development of the subject site will impact adjacent development and the road would impact the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the ordinance requiring screening will create an undue hardship which would unreasonably interfere with the development of the subject site. 2. There are no unique property characteristics including topography, size or shape which interferes with the development of the subject site. This is undeniably the case as the applicant has not been hampered in development efforts because of physical limitations associated with the subject site. 3. The screening works to protect both the subject site from adjacent development including road noise, as well as protecting the adjacent property from the impacts generated on the subject site. 4. In conclusion, there is no justification to exempt the applicant from the screening provisions of the ordinance except that the applicant disagrees with the requirements. Since reasonable development rights remain even without the variance, the variance is denied. UNION AVENUE COMPANY V-061-83 October 25, 1983 Page 4 DECISION: The variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 26th day of October, 1983. Fred J. Kaufm Land Use HearA. Examine TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1983, to the parties of record: Richard F. Loman 9021 N.E. 10th Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Ray Griffin 14306 - 144th S.E. Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1983 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before November 9, 1983. Any aggrieved perion feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. OF R A. 46 THE. CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o 4:8) BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9. 0 o FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593o9/ TeD SEPl - tO November 14, 1983 Union Avenue Company 110 - 110th Avenue N.E. , Suite 403 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Richard F. Loman RE: File No. V-061-83 Dear Mr. Loman: The Examiner's Report regarding the above referenced application, which was published on October 26, 1983, has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is con- sidered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. ' Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or infor- mation is required. Sincerely, ft6)14,,,./ Iib,.......ve \ Fred J. Cpufman Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:se cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Dept. Parties of Record AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King SUE ELLISTON being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 26th day of October 1983 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn th i s_2 7 day of () r;/747,1 J , 19 gj. dpe6 Nota`iy Public in an for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: UNION AVENUE COMPANY: V-061-83 The minute's contain a Lost o6 the pantLa o6 necond. ) CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 18, 1983 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. UNION AVENUE COMPANY - Application for a variance from Section 4-2006, Part 1-D, Screening of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance which requires a solid wall or view obscuring fence or barrier along the entire periphery of Sunnydale Mobile Home Park, file V-061-83; property located at 375 Union Avenue S.E. BECKMANN HOMES, INC. Application to rezone 0.2 •acres of property from R-1 to L-1 to allow construction- of a 5,000 square foot office,, shop and storage building, file R-060-83; property located at 708 and 712 S.W. 13th Street. VIP'S RESTAURANTS, INC. Application for site approval to allow a 9,206 square foot sit down restaurant ("La Casa Rea'1"), file SA-042-83; property located on the northwest corner of Rainier Avenue South and S.W. Grady Way. 0354Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 18, 1983 APPLICANT: UNION AVENUE COMPANY FILE NUMBER: V-061-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant requests variance from Section 4-2006, Part 1-D, Screening, of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance which requies a solid wall or view obscuring fence or barrier along the entire periphery of Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. Specifically, the request is to apply to the southern and western property lines and the south 210 feet of the eastern property line. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Union Avenue Company 2. Applicant: Union Avenue Company 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) West side, of Union Avenue S.E. and adjacent to the southerly boundary of the existing "Leisure Estates" mobile home community. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 30 acres. 6. Access: Via Union Avenue S.E. 7. Existing Zoning: T". Trailer Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1. "T". R-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Multi-Family, Greenbelt. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on October 7, 1983, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on October 7, 1983. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #3143 of June 13, 1977. The property was later rezoned by Ordinance #3673 of November 5, 1982. Since the rezone, a mobile home park known as "Sunnydale Mobile Home Community" was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 9, 1983, and is currently under construction. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER UNION AVENUE COMPANY: FILES V-061-83 OCTOBER 18, 1983 PAGE 2 D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject site has been graded with finished slope generally from northeast to southwest at grades ranging from 1-20%. The central greenbelt/recreation area is the steepest area with some slopes of approximately 20%. 2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC), 6 to 15% slopes. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The majority of the site has been cleared. Along the eastern, southern and western boundaries are stands of evergreen trees, brush and natural undergrowth. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: Some surface water was observed on the subject site in the temporary storm water retention ponds. 6. Land Use: The subject site is currently being developed as a mobile home park. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are a combination of single family residence, mobile home dwellings, power transmission lines and undeveloped proberties. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water -. A twelve-inch water main extends north-south along the east side of Union Avenue S.E. to the east of the subject site. b. Sewer An; eight-inch sewet line extends along the northern property line of the subject site and along Union Avenue N.E. In addition, there is also a private lift station along the northern property line. c. Storm .Water .Drainage - Drainage is to the west. Plans have been approved for'both retention and discharge. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METFtn Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue. N.E. approximately 3/4 of a mile north of the subject site. 4. Schools: Honeydew Elementary School is located approximately one mile north of the subject site. McKnight Middle School is approximately three miles north and 'west of the subject site and Hazen High School is located approximately tWO miles north and east of the property. 5. Recreation: Ki*anis Park is located approximately one mile north of the subject site while Highlands Park is approximately one mile northwest of the site. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-722(G), Variances. 2. Section 4-714, "T", Trailer Parks. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER UNION AVENUE COMPANY: FILES V-061-83 OCTOBER 18, 1983 PAGE 3 H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1981); Section 4, 4.A.1, p. 8; Section 4.C, 4.C.3, p.9; Section 4.C.10, p. 10. 2. Title 4, Chapter 20 - Mobile Home Parks. I.IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: . Not applicable. 2. Population/Employment: Not applicable. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable. 5. Traffic: .Not applicable. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, RCW 43-21C, the subject variance request _ is exempt from the threshold determination of environmental significance. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning;,Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3.. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant, Union Avenue" Company, is seeking a variance from Section 4-2006, Part 1D, Screening of a Mobile Home Park. This requires a solid wall or sight obscuring fence or barrier along the entire periphery of Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. This specific variance is to cover the southern and western property lines along with the south 210 feet of the eastern property line. 2. The Land Use Hearing Examiner in considering the variance request must address four criteria as delineated under Section 4-722(G). a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to ' subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, and, the strict application of the zoning code is found to deprive the subject property owner of the rights and privledges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The applicant points to the physical nature of the adjacent properties specifically that along the southern western property lines, the area is undeveloped, heavily treed and unoccupied thus making screening unnecessary. In the case of the eastern property, the southern 200 feet is adjacent to the City of Seattle water pump station and the site is adequately screened. In addition, the City of Seattle site has a large cyclone fence surrounding their property. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER UNION AVENUE COMPANY: FILES V-061-83 OCTOBER 18, 1983 PAGE 4 This criteria was established to protect the mobile home dwellers as well as the adjacent property owners. It can be argued that the hardship is time, not necessarily physical limitations of the property. It appears to be untimely to screen the property because it provides no substantive benefit at the present time. However, with development of the properties to the south and west and the construction of a major collector arterial along the southern, property line, screening will become paramount because a fence will not screen the arterial 'which will be much higher than the mobile home park on the south, period. On the other hand, planting landscape 'materials at this time may also be premature in that they may have to be removed with the construction of the street. In.any case, the variance is a permanent release of the obligation of screening. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the zone in which the subject property is situated. The applicants justification is correct in that it will not be injurious to the public welfare or to the adjacent property. This is only because of the time. The property to the south and west is presently uninhabited, but a similar case could be drawn to Leisure Estates which did not have to do the screening along their southern property line and now Sunnydale Mobile Home Park is faced with providing the screening for both themselves and Leisure Estates. c. That the approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with'the limitation upon uses of the other property in the vicinity and the zoning in which the subject is situated._ It can be clearly"seed that Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park to the north was not 'required to place the screening at the time of construction. However, it does not appear logical to establish a policy of transferring the ipurden to the adjacent property owner. In this specific case, any improvements to the roadway would be required to provide the additional landscaping and/or screening. In effect, this could be considered special privilege because it places the responsibility of screening at a future time and upon the municipality or to the general property owners in the area as a result of an LID. d. That the approval as determined by the Examiner or Board of Adjustment is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The desired purpose is only considered in the immediate sense and not considered long term. If we had a permanent physical feature that we knew was not going to be modified or there was potential for future adjacent development it would appear that the request would be a minimum variance, However, as presented, the request appears to be a transfer of development responsibility to the City of Renton or the adjacent property Owner. Because it was done at one time in the past, it is not reasonable to make a similar decision. 3. The variance request has been reviewed by various city departments and all of the comments focus on the fact that the applicant is justified until the adjacent properties develop. However, as stated by the Policy Development Department, a future condition of screening concurrent with road construction would be difficult to monitor and enforce. Therefore denial is appropriate. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER UNION AVENUE COMPANY: FILES V-061-83 OCTOBER 18, 1983 PAGE S 4. The applicant has another means of eliminating the requirement at the present time. The Board of Public Works can grant a deferral for on-site improvements for a maximum period of five (5) years. It would seem more appropriate to use this method instead of granting an outright variance at this point. At the end of the five years it may be appropriate to seek a variance for permanent reduction of the standard. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the variance request by Union Avenue Company. V-061-83, be denied. I.)-- i '•) Ni li I B-1 B-y R-3 a oo HU JL J IL i _ 1 w 1 liiI1 ,r t, II I I l L'I GREEc•.1 NPOD I : r 4 1 1 r 1 R-3 GI-1 C,O I r . J_ 1 4 ems• I I I 1 it R-1,,, R-1 t 1 1 1. if" 1 a• • y I I. G—I I I..'•..'•.' I'' • - J•. . .\•_,.. A.1 r . •u•nr' I i„,..,.. .. ,c ,a ....kii....t.„ . „. .• -.. 1 r i; .,..)......1 -.••• , .. 1 I _ i • f, ' 1 1j tirei1ti.). r :J Imo'. '- i :•• 1 i,, ` 6• o•aP r tto ,,{" 'i ' *-S ' 1w a^. • A. •%• H • , , , I rJ w 4; UNION AVENUE COMPANY V-061-83 APPL I CANT UNION AVENUE COMPANY TOTAL AREA — 30 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS , UNION AVENUE S.E. EXISTING ZONING i T, TRAIILER PARK EXISTING USE MOBILE HOME PARK (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) PROPOSED USE MOBILE HOME PARK COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN LOW DENSITY MULTI—FAMILY/GREENBELT COMMENTS S. L L. L L. L, L, L L : flt N -,,* fitieN45011, ~se. N.\\... ; . ., a R I q/ ns4$ , 1 g , ait WIC r'' f Rosewood LL Drive7•IM1]M.571•n in 45,,,.$ .f) V Of iii rei: 101;„..,... I iD4 yrwy I^'' - . . [ . P . r 6 ti tl P, • g 1. ( t;,;\ Iii . %11,,,.., 1AllII: .1.. ice 11f6SI...t d[it1_- l mean E, m 1 liplitt,• <-lam r' t 4ir tify arc 1111 mean ` ti , y 41,11t4op i stf$V do VS7\ •to U-1-' as I I 1 1L' I, yQ Off,'\ •, 1 s_ I nJ , t t ` ®' r' - mean r- C..,'.. e 0 el;1.i us 1 I-11 i S ,q e SEi >s2k mean. 2/ . :,ar,nr • 11\-inajo i 1 . 2 7. vs - • =nal f•-- - i I r an • , • , r' JUL 2 6 c sce ,,, •. . -....4 : .. -7 E . . . k P- LI.P6°*7 I sue•i, % .\ ® ® on it, II :23 as 1. 7,S 14P * 7 ,s4;10'. ..- ' . • '; -' . 4? 14 s* r.' 6 CMCIM r- 1 . 42 a) Elti,L.-I - ' 0 -air.:11. 1 I I.iiir...... 1"/c7 N ilZ47,e I E i i in CCIM-13-,•-• teat. /N * 7 :49' • c• .- •' . ' '.''' 1,"•/ e--- 1 4/ s* *. t.,. 4....--- m. CLtiming' s's: L..2;111mila. - 1 la=1... r- all= /........ 4.•NNN 07. PIII.ASIE: ,. . ii 41W 4 1 " 1: 11111.- '-*---.1 TJ r-- "_ Jan . f i•tj c les f 3 nf:e147iw_ 11.:'11'1 7. i4‘ 9. 47 i, /' k.., . 4.../ . ,iMonB—169 o. l n --" 1/ 00. \ jv1,/ 4 _r mean : 1.444 /f 0 61> ® 1 ter. T j' e! L I v 7. i r r - _ _ `-come:- i g- ©: , \,o IL'-'-'1111 1._ L 1r i 1.• . fski A0 7/ A'N17 E . de t F. H ' 8 s.iIi1pHAS - Alladroas Drive I 7_, P ,_..„ t ......... •,. ... .,. ........, 1.••••poom, . ....... ii g .-'0" e - 0 1rNE7l T4'' A7.r.Yv 4: 1 ice. -!--.!--. Li-- .1-. ter.. I—... L—. i. ..—. . —.--. L,pVyiiOfGti 2 to .N.,! tWmoJb.st/-e5 r t ie f I I 4.. Lf.ChM...n. NO1L•,"AWL.L/Q...CAWHAG sif60 F.QY`l,L7 70,74L V• .'00 O pi.GtO 4M1'G I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1Dl/ CO 69Y1,44''! JAPPROVED PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS FANOT APPROVED, fis4 geff,/ ke,c10/6 SGdeG 54 4/ ' o/e /1" so / /MJ I CY/ ' 1 a/ bii'4 C,,wei s W 54ohi . As-eee7g Vte. ® _e_& 4 P& G/&e konx. as 4red 6 feat sI'iee a Mi a" 1 ng../ g/ Qo/ OtrgAim/%frAmd&J / act•lip a A c4 DATE: e / f/A SIGNATURE OF DIREOF: ditaPfit42' PRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 GREVIEWINGDEPARTMENT/DIVISION; ELAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED r I 'aas te.4---r DATE: e3 SIG 00rOF DIRECTOR OR aov ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rirU AltiPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE, % 1 O SpNATURE IR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVTgION : APPROVED PPROVED WI H CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED , r Cam_A2- s© 1- (j>f LLB 3L4/h 6,_c,.;..., 1..;, . rE,66 c--- ----Z4 le------- DATE: F/2-5/1 SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE 1 ` REVISION 5/1082 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 6 /rteeriyy El APPROVED 2/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPRIYAL SUBJECT TO I LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER ; 1/0 LATE. COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER s 5-255 O'D.D2-SA(). r. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER yis `3O0•°s awl, igo1i/e`n4.41...u.vf/1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER EsIt 300.ooeac,4 „ 1 i SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CIIARbE • WATER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER //p APPROVED WATER PLAN yrs. ok/ APPROVED SEWER PLAN y,'S -'- APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. yots 0Y- FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS L\ , Q i,_ DATE: 9-. ,2(C3 SIGNATUREIDF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 1p,' ' ENG/iVEt .//LJC•, El APPROVED Fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED 67--- .'s C.c e Goy c c./ r rs 2./,/44 7lc•k.. e9 u 42.S Zci GJ e-e_. k.Ati 141 Such 74> -.t.. 741. ,t- Y4- .5.°4w71/ 4%.--,e/ Id e-5/.41-fr 4;7?// Dc't- Fop -t,E.,s D ,,dp 0 6i5e5. 47:44, t: DATE: p6,//p SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE w.....w.wu .dawww REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI, ,ION : 1/4 0-APPROVED I IAPPRO D WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Q,o OW u1actat, r.. é4'a Zde /ifotoottc.€* 4u Areseis, el >to/id/le"- 4"1:14 r41`4( i. th4 timuk4A. AtAruae-- fioct 0-400.kaaArtjed gar4-1 r# 4, a44, 0‘ ieiezejtet frriogree. IL,._ _ .__4. DATE, 47 SIGNATOor . RED• ' •R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 4,1rig i F OF R IL Tf4:SEPtE r Cit of,- Renton Land Use:.,H:earinn Examiner. . .y 9 L. L wall hold a, C .:' ', . „0 '' ''''' 'L,.:. , k • f ..,,,,. ..._..,2 . .. .. .: .,,. .,..,..,„%,;.;.. L...,... y.,,,: „.,... . , .. ,.,..,,,,,,„, „, ,,,.:,,,,... in' .,.",--::',- -:,::.,,r.,.,,Q, .:-2., . : . ". r' , , k. ' ' r. .'''''r"''?' CI`TY' 'COUNCIL :.CHAMBERS.;...;,-:CITY HALL; Oft OCTOBERi'18 n•1983' •• •' BEGINNING :SAT .. char) A.M.' • „ PP.M. CONC RNING FILE V OG1-83° REZONEFrom SPECIAL .CONDITION;AL US•E PERMIT', SITE•APPROVAL S.' . SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISI N of Loth PLANNED: UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM.,SECTION 4-200G, PART 1-D ' ...' ' . - , • ' ' n GENERAL ' LOCATION :AND/OR_ •ADDRESS:r LOCATED AT,,375.1JNION AVEN1E,S.E, PI r LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE' RENTON,:BUILDING•'.& ZONING' DEPARTMENT,: ', ENVIRONMENT L :DECLARATION : SIGNIFICANT` NON=,SIGNIFICANT. FOR. FIJRT„HER INFORMATION CALL'''.THE-CITY OF.. RENTON - ;• '''..,,. BUILDING&ZONING .DEPARTMENT 235-2550 v,, Vi".s , THIS .NOT I CENOT TO.: REMO1 ED WITHOUT r P PF AUTH RI' TIONn ' • , . , „ „ - ne Oakhurst Development Corporation no 110th Avenue N.E.Suite 403,Bellevue,WA 98004 (206)624-8950 Real Estate Development PRESIDENT October 3, 1983 Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Variance - Chapter 20, Section 4-2006 Dear Mr. Blaylock: With regard to our request for a variance from requirements of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance dated September 16, 1983, we inadvertently left out of the application the southern most section of the existing chain link fence (amounting to approx- imately 210') which is already installed between the Sunnydale southeasterly corner and the Seattle Water Company property, to the east. We want to leave this particular section of in place fence "as is" since there are no adjacent houses or streets from which screening is necessary. The variance requested on September 16 should now read "That we be excused from slating or landscaping or otherwise "view obscuring" the chain link fence that we intend to erect along our southern and westerly boundary lines and the section of existing chain link fence of approximately 210 linear feet separating the southeasterly corner of Sunnydale from the Seattle Water Company property to the east." Thank you. Very truly yours, 4 Richa 'd F. anal RFL/lmn f i ) i Rx 9 3 i-' OCT 3 1983 Member of Seattle Master Builders Association and National Association of Industrial and Office Parks Contractor's License#OAKHUD234MM r REI N BUILDING & ZONING DE ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) DfiVPi0 ouc,r PROPONENT: UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTYLINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO: I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: N/A El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10-4-83 Ei UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : efr/ i,i LI APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS j,.A0T APPROVED siai Ord #a/ ái#c/,m,c xi Sl 44/ 4 M' e'/Ic / s i4e1/ o‘e,fr,r 7/20e; v6 it/Alf/4 lif-p/ate Ati /(/ d - 5eiew I- efeht_te7, 1, n of Gee Gel-5 Aired 6 cif s/4'ee 4 Mie &IV 4-4r 6/C' l/ L'ddJ'JG G /1 Gtl y f%?J;S?/C iit/f c 041 o G rvit76 /1'O/J'06li• liQ°11 0' t/d//S a o 4 A I DATE:E 2? SIGNATURE OF DIR w HER RESENTATIVE I REVISION 5/1982 REI 1N BUILDING & ZONING DE'. itTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) PROPONENT : UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: N/A 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION I:: TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10-4-83 LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 9 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (B- 61)‘- APPROVED LIIJ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 1 ,4i-. -,eeatig‘i° , b) Iitaixst- p2, i ` I, 10,0_,s1 —" 0if SIGNATU" y" utr DATE: 7-44423 OF DIRECTOR OR . ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REI. IN BUILDING & ZONING DE'. `.; r...*ton fire Dept, evontion Durezu DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RE. firSH' ECF - 038 - 83 SEP 2 0 1t3 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) PROPONENT: UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE; N/A 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION I TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10-4-83 flUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ei BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT fiOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ri17.0 N ILPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r,,-;;;271---------------> DATE: `" 13 SI ATURE AUTHORIZEDCTORORAUTHRIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REF IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ;TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) PROPONENT : UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: N/A ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10-4-83 El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WI H CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED c&L f DATE: 7/z3/45-,3 SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REf .N BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) PROPONENT : UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10-4-83 OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2(//l` He'elrht;1JJ OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ENOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL.•SUBJECT TO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER A/p LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER es 5-255 ;70.02.5-AQ.pr• SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER S 300.°•P cac% m&, ,/e,4..e' A.L.ed-vi/z SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER yes It 300.0eQC i 1/ 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER N© APPROVED WATER PLAN yorsov APPROVED SEWER PLAN VAS U4/. APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. JA; G ._ FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS A7® i..44 DATE: r-- ,26 -' SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REI; IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-061-83) PROPONENT: UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE ; SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO: n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A ElENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 10-4-83 El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT flPOLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5;00 P .M, ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 7',9FteiG ENC/iVE ,i,ti El APPROVED br APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED y1.eQ t1.S 7 e GJ' a•c•, b.4-r IL."/ Svcjt 74> 7 oge 410,0 Tp,ci Weil P T> a o/r PATE:423 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE' REPRESENTATIVE QRVICIAN S/10A7 RE!: IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ;TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 038 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (v-061-83) PROPONENT : UNION AVENUE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : SUNNYDALE MOBILE HOME PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-2006 (1)(D) TO WAIVE REQUIREMENT OF A SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE OR HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 375 UNION AVENUE S.E. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: N/A ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 10-4-83 Ei UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EIPOLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5;00 P .M. ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; O./APPROVED APPROV D WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED eto Ae-3,/ eorde•reo• 101.41, 44K tkr:td )0/1-4144(- tz4(.24 ?'4•41( th4 Arddi° toznauck, rya. wee rC/ DATE: 9-.z0--603 SIGNATAfr 7i RE 7: - iR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON .. . A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON OCTOBER 18, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: UNION AVENUE COMPANY Application for a variance from Section 4-2006, Part 1-D, Screening of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance which requires a solid wall or view obscuring fence or barrier along the entire periphery of Sunnydale Mobile Home Park, file V-061-83; property located at 375 Union Avenue S.E. BECKMANN HOMES, INC. Application to rezone 0.2 acres of property from R-1 to L-1 to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot office, shop and storage building, file R-060-83; property located at 708/and 712 S.W. 13th Street. VIP'S RESTAURANTS, INC. Application for site approval to allow a 9,206 square foot sit down restaurant ("La Casa Real"), file SA-042-83; property located on the northwest corner of Rainier Avenue South and S.W. Grady.Way. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 18, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : OCTOBER 7, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the 7th day of October, 1983. J• „A SIGNED: \__Je_A.A.A. FLinc6 Y. (icy O 1'..ITY OF RE T : 4 FILE NO(S): " O 5, fr BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT iill'f a1 r v j L, i AsTE ,ppu Tie N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) I' APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES UNION AVENUE COMPANY ADDRESS L REZONE*(FROM TO 110 110th Avenue N.E. ,- Suite 403 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, Washington 98004 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT 206) 624-8950 No. of Cubic Yards: VARIANCE Chapter 200 j CONTACT PERSON From Section: 4-2006 NAME Justification Required 4 Richard F. Loman ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 110 110th Avenue N.E. , Suite 403 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, Washington 98004 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT 206) 624-8950 WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF COTS: - `_,)t NAME PLAT NAME: UNION AVENUE COMPANY ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 110 110th Avenue N.E., Suite 403 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP FINAL Bellevue, Washington 98004 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 206) 624-8950 Residential ® Industrial aCommercial Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 375 Union Avenue S.E. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Under Development ' Ti ri'` c 2;> ` ' PROPOSED USE I, -PARK NAME: J` Mobile Home-PAr k NUMBER OF SPACES: c., ," Sunnyda l e"ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.•r - " aL FT. ACRES AREA: 1 ,306,800 30 + Acres TOTAL FEES a STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP CEI Oa•• RENTOdtR .APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: r Ill, [1 11:0 ' APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Accepted S EP 1 9 1983 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE RO a'TE 3"(3/-0NIPt(i P 'T, ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 1 -2 0 -e)l• Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: ERR Building Design Eng. ER Fire 0 Parks OP ea Police tal Policy Dev. ti Traffic Eng. MI Utilities REVISION 5/1AR? Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the North 330 feet thereof, TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress, utilities and road purposes over the east 30 feet of the North 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington. AFFIDAVIT Richard F. Loman P being duly sworn, declare that I am 0 authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 16th DAY OF September 19 83 • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Bot_hel1 UNION AVENUE COMPANY Ji( Name of Notary Public) N gnature Owner) Richard F. Loman, General Partner Snohomish County, Washington 110 110th Avenue N.E. , Suite 403 Address) Address) Bellevue, Washington 98004 City) State) (Zip) 206) 624-8950 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." September 16, 1983 1 OTTT u' RF:? T HOC '...- VARIANCE APPLICATION Cont. LJSEP191983 TO LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER BUILDJNG!`_' i• iNE G i_iEr T, BACKGROUND: As 'presently written the Mobile Home Park Ordinance Chapter 20 - Mobile Home Parks) , Section 4-2006, Part 1-D, Screening, provides as follows: A solid wall or view obscuring fence, hedge or equivalent barrier not less than five feet (5 ') in height shall be established and maintained around the entire periphery of the park except for openings for driveway and walkway purposes." In the proposed, pending revision of this Ordinance, the Screening provisions evidently will appear in a new Section 4-2005, Part 1-C, but, reads the same as above) . VARIANCE REQUESTED: That we be excused from slating or landscaping, or otherwise "view obscuring" the chain link fence that we intend to erect along our southern and westerly boundary lines. JUSTIFICATION: a) Because of the location of the subject property, we would suffer undo hardships if the Building and Zoning Code is strictly applied to our southern and westerly boundary lines. The surrounding property at these locations is undeveloped, heavily treed, and unoccupied, making a screen unnecessary. b) The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to the property in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated because the adjoining property is uninhabited. c) The approval shall not constitute a:•grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the Vicinity andrzone •in which the subject property is situated.. (Leisure Estates, directly to the.north, was excused from screening their southern boundary at a time when our property was un- developed) . d) This approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. SUMMARY: In as much as the property to the west and south of Sunnydale is heavily vegetated, undeveloped and uninhabited; and because of the rough terrain is likely to remain so, we feel no screening is necessary at this point and the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the vicinity. DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT UNION AVENUE COMPANY THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW. IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY US PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIRED. DELUXE - FORM NWC-2 V-2 I DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 9/19/83 Fee for Variance Application 150.00 v-a