Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-081 (3)BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MCR0tYIED l 1 3124.Ir 0064 Ott. IYO A-i ria.16 Illy.40-Oratlr. i Iy.17 ltnt flew n.. S $ly.17 L....flow.Ir Ili .,y.11 Illy.Ilu..tlw r — a Uy.,. nw nr LIy.a.tr,rl cr.,u o .11r.ur.(tut U.trtr) s+v a> urwn n :s Illy.Is.u ril I«uwt 10 .Iy.1) Mill Yntrt 1, Illy.It.U.Y,p re rlr 4 of F W[` a - a1dUr,u.rI.ITE BLIONL 19 -- s .d INDEX iii 1 9( IL-4." Y I( „.. 111 mil _- _ -. 1. _ L. .1-1N.t' ... If tanrsna il 1 lr VAI jai M r ASE iA Iii Itutunc is $ -I BMW 17 I4 c '••••1 ri r st 0 le mom - ---- I i- VICINITY MAP 7 2 v•v I 1 '- v-. .- ttru o I v +"-- t! I 1iIrI 1 I POWELL AVE. S.W. --- - y 9 f ' F --1 —15-- -1- SITE PLAN 1'1'r 5 GENERAL NOTES 13 A-1 z TF-E 0 MAEHLI1vI Z GROUP 1. ' c_,,,.Ip 4 ARCHITECT" Z 1 a 9 0 4 i-,,..----7-T lari-cf , Me _,______ lerg_ • Me* 1 ad-e ri-, i . 04 I \ risen • 14/ r 7W i 00 1 r*ef mf-ef ri.4 t.ir__.._.__,_rf___rt._..._._____....,r_ e, fftLr„ .. , 01 l'\• i i§ a 0i _,--,,,,, Tr s 0"-— b• i:e+-:—. A 0 7- 0 1 I 1 1 11 IP 1 I 1 ,q1 • 1- , , , , , ,. .,•-••-•- f1 • I• 1 11 i ; 114- 11 ! ; 1 I- ; ; •: . I111 .101 ; ; ; IHI ; •, : I a•-,. t, ---- . 1 FLOOR PLANT BLDG. 16 A-2 04.9ico TFf_0 0 17.7>./ CD -J"‹ MAEHLUMi--, -....- r---Io GEW1-4C... X) PPn =.7....7.,fin ARCHITECTSz4-; —• ,...:-..--c J-1 0 ,.-..... a 0 z 0 (...) fv, 1 A --- a l leIb1W fI • MO IwrKW+i.y TENANT NAME lIII 11 IIH.IiIuIIIIiuiIII I 1u till1III1 EAST TWA,.come TILT LP -mil 1 yiijLLli 1: [ _ i o1i t SOUTH NORTH I WEST „ BLDG. 16 A-3 ELEVATIONS LA U..: U THEz `_;-,ice R. r <if° I I . .41.. ; MAEHLUM GROUP z _.0v ao ARCHITECTS n a)Z SECTION A-A to w G:r-1 1 E.....j" I• c c›. . TT1 RT _ _._T----- 11 I it II I iI I II 1 u_, k__ n r, 1 71'IN r FIRST FLOOR PLAN BLDG. 17 A-4 7:17rA n TI-Er7 O L T._ 0 MAAEE I-LUM t•, ., . r 7-, GI LJLJ fP G.-:7m u3 C p ARCHITECTS n3 rl 71 p inCMLi HI L1Q Z.QJcea. 1.._- ..— ,_ _..— .. _ a QzOUwN II Ell 112— ill iI a liIII I1! II cz.]__ 1 I 4 II , mi.• Tvid - iI c 1III I 1 II p 1, I 6 I II II E 1. I, 11 it p 11 I J II II II 11 II I II ci II II II II p I I 11 I i I i E 1minnow1HummingIIIIIII 1 illlllll t CITY OF RENTON 1. 1 t R' P M J y , I Ill NOV 14 19E3 i i , 1 I WEST v.. 1 v-- iTiTiii 1 I l ! Hh1 SOUTHI,,, 5 NORTH 2 it ti i r f 111 II J 1 %rt/ EAST v.• 3 'BLDG. 17 A-6 MI..PM ,,,-y, ELEVATIONS r 7. 1 I I 1 ina.T-,..,Cal..OrMs•J Naze. 11.•,MOW' F u THE 11. o U iT MAE jLMx:o IGROP Z I __4-'-- ARCHITECTS a. 0) r=3Z SECTION A—A vs. 4 71 C a 333 I TENANT NAME 1i III EAST 7----f DOW-UAL.•WM.-T.=A18c .w. mawro.wu.'...Ai.w.crnr I 1 1 1 Lii i r NORTH 1.- 7 1n zo c c CO a LO Z WEST „a• BLDG. 18 A-8 Fr TI-f11_ M 1 MAEH_UM nm c r.nesgn m— f—--- N L i r 4 p ARCHITECTS SECTION A-A 118. SOUTH r\ C Q jir 0-t MI 0--- ‘.4 0 i- t O y\. i i M o i Q Plod CITY Or REgNTON ili• NOV 14 i3o3 r Z as. I TT7 I i 1 i. H,././to rd NIP ' AL Tr7"11 . 11 . i : i ' . : i111Hil ! klY I ti. ri- 1 I— L i ; 1 1 la '4Ii' 1 L, lik, _ _ 0,wile t...._._. 4 e....... 14(.........ma) i a. I M1 iLi LAl Mal"(".......-i) 1 \1 ( D Jul1 1? r 1 per\ { 1 { ~ I 11' i.;a.' l a ems: if •a s 't . _ 'F.:- 7:. i.Rz.,,: ,r.... 1 r.- ." rl • Iaa -5 I. SITE PLAN SCALE 1"1 A LA-1 GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST 9 o ep all oysm r ae Y. 15 Ywas mew.Haan. ...ow 1 Y4•.a•W, l A.nia tallKN 15 .a1MW alafNulfa ni,--ni-i W J Ya•-t"rx. rflltt}R W Omlltf IC.LLi QIM'm a •jrizv Z ar vLaDT.maws. Ma 1Qt Rl o1.L1M'i nrodect l au. N•e. N}q w Se1Mta Ra. yI E Y 1• Ay ma. N._...UM .ott.n ..a Js.,_a.t. .THEw"LX as naf ..7...,....: 6.. O -4 .c j0 M Pf m ARCHITECTS CO r. 44 OF R4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTU4$ rLl RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTORZo O 'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-25409, 0 0. A09ltEoSEP1 OP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1986 TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM: C o er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT.. DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short of parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking, lot line adjustments have been approved in which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30. 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to construct Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." HOW I(i c Q kjE k fi'r1 RJB:JSM:ss PP. ``-3( ' ) FLU j 9)I-?5:, 2156Z SA 41--35 '' FP Ico•l I I, S(-1 et)G-2s3l-I h i0t.`z I H ) Au, 3A•SI sh D l g N Uh 3 ULM H Sn ig. Llt u5. 5 \1jii 3P-12‘1.9) C'^Or"REN700 I JAN MAffidavitofPublication61984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Ss. udrey DeJoie zF' Mg mzm i being first duly sworn on w m OwC07p__1wz 1 she cnief clerk z wZ2oro oath,deposes and says that is the of Ir m c O z c) r >mr=mTHEDAILYRECORDCHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a jz o=_ z week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been 0 m m-c m m OT for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, 0 z c z I printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper iC Z 0 m cn m 0 I published four(4)times a week-in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is un m Co z 11 now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record f 8 _ _.i_ O o m'Z s• Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior o 3 3 v n O O N $> m o m m lrt Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,g H m o - v m cAn r z m O y go o m`5ENz1z<•• -nDzOxDOmpONoticeofPublico o- Oc? z m c) Washington.That the annexed is a i a o w v O -- 0 0 OT 21 Emanm * Q =z n *ApNC m earin R8876w o w m m Z = ,i=C- m3 1. a m mc m wto nnmm m o my Z G) m- -1 O cm`n . m>O z z> as it was published in regular issues(and 5' m v m--t z F o T O-1 not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period z y ma 3 r cfosma • 0w .o of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the S' a. m a 2 n<a-8 a y f. g m S =. oOct 3 my go3ii:t1 dayof i eCaTilvar 19 63 ,and ending the j c ? i g'' a 7 i 7 c a 30th December 3 m dayof 19 both dates m =m kg gc m zi of csg>vinclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-CD scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 72 $g C 'm n c)m m m-•pc 4•20 poat amwv r)a-l ocmi > charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which Li.3 3 w$ti m g,- • 6 al t t r y r¢-m has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I- o c o c,_ in m o _. first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent w a g .4 n y v m c $o R insertion. I3 3 + _b r n <i o S2 g z$' xp? o m $ c 76 rn G m.R v(C s. z o.2 g c. N Co t mg° mma 3 v m amo e g g-g EZ m a cc 2--o m a 0 a' -3 m m Cnie Clerk 77a2N1E.Q o..•??43+ Tam O W w ma arm o 3 - <O -a rd. PaTa `r ri>>_^s0172 °) , Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 dayof 33 0 m m m m$ `D oo ud 03 ,..v 3 January 81 m,'; 33m m gm$a*ncm0 19 m. Ng30 m H = m mmb p g -E O 4, 00 •G), aj2Iv< sm F. g. .mm 0e52z- S. wa 0 Notary Public in and for the Si f Washington, r cc resit j i County. 9 9'o U 6 'ca E 2 3 g Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State.y VN e87 Revised 5/82 OF R4,4, 4 4y © ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z p BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 o- o P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -25939 FD SEPTE O February 2, 1984 Mr. Larry Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No.:SA-081-83 Holvick, deRegt, Koering Dear Mr. Davis: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on January 12, 1984 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 0422E 4, SA- og,l;- 83 S-00114110044 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING November 23, 1983 it NOV 2 8 1983,Mr. Roger Blaylock I, Planning Office CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 III RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING #16-19 Dear Mr. Blaylock: Holvick deRegt Koering has asked the Transpo Group to review and comment on our alternative use proposals for Washington Technical Center. They have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and p.m. peak hour trip generation between the final environmental impact statement statistics of building mix to a proposed mixed use of 75% office and 25% manufacturing. The review and comparison is enclosed in the following Transpo Group report. The results of the Transpo Group review indicates that although we are increasingthe office use over the projected office use in the environ- mental impact statement, we are reducing overall trips generated from the site. This reduction is due to the seventeen acres being lost to the City of Renton for the P-1 channel and the reduction of the heavy truck traffic trip generation that was associated with heavy and light warehousing. This report should answer any questions the City has regarding their concern of trips generated from the site and how it may affect the original impacts outlined in the environmental impact statement. If you have any questions, please contact myself or Mr. Dave Markley at The Transpo Group at your earliest convenience. We look forward to hearing from you on when we will be scheduled before the Hearing Ex- aminer on our site plan approval for the above referenced buildings. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING C 13I Loren Davis LD/gb 725 POWELL AVENUE S.W., SUITE A, RENTON, WA 98055 TELEPHONE (206) 226-1222 co py The Transportation Engineering & Planning Consultants TRANSPO Grove Cityr( MOrg&IGM f` i `, • t ypCtq^ November 22, 1983 Mr. Loren Davis NOV. 2HolvickdeRegtKoering 1983' 725 Powell Avenue SW Suite A Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Dear Mr. Davis: Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to review and comment on alterna- tive site plan proposals for the Washington Technical Center. As requested, we have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and PM peak hour trip generation, the generation of heavy truck traffic, and a general estimate of the effect of these traffic volumes on the street network. Development Options The base condition used for comparison is the development proposal outlined in the February 1981 FEIS for the Earlington Park project. The Earlington Park proposal covered 109.31 acres with a building area of1,980,880 square feet. As depicted in Table 1 this proposal contains a mix of warehouse, business park and office uses. The first development option (Option#1) covers 81.28 acres and accounts for a total building area of 1,416,230 square feet. The reduction in building acreage is the result of 17 acres that were set aside for a retention pond for roads that were not accounted for in the initial EIS. The uses under Option #1 are confined to business park and office uses only. Under Option #2, the 81.28 acres is divided into two parcels in accor- dance with ownership of the property including 28.17 acres under the control of Holvick deRegt Koering (HdK) , and 53.11 acres under the control of First City Equities. Under development Option #2, the HdK properties would be developed with business park and office uses only, while the First City Equities properties would maintain a mix of land uses that are proposed to be in approximate proportion to the mix of land uses found in the original Earlington Park proposal . The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 23-148th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 641-3881 II, The TRANS1 Mr. Loren Davis Grov(' November 22, 1983 Page 2 Summary In summary, this analysis finds that the daily trip generation associated with development Options #1 or #2 would decrease by 9 and 11.5 percent, respectively, as compared with the original Earlington Park proposal . The evening peak hour traffic volumes will decrease from 2660 vehicles per hour (vph) by 430 to 470 vph or a 16 to 18 percent decrease as compared with the Earlington Park proposal . Of greater significance is the reduction in the heavy truck volumes that relate to the elimination of heavy warehousing. On a daily basis, heavy truck volumes are anticipated to reduce by 15 to 60 percent. During the peak hour, volumes are estimated to stay the same or be reduced by as much as 40 percent as compared with the Earlington Park proposal . A part of the Washington Technical Center Revised Site Plan, is a connection from the site to Monster Road. As noted in our previous report of September 14, 1982, this is expected to reduce volumes by as much as 15 to 25 percent of the daily and peak hour traffic volumes. As part of the development of the first phase of devlopment two traffic signals were installed. These improvements served to mitigate first and second phase impacts. The Monster Road Connection, the reduction in traffic volumes, the lower number of heavy trucks, and the recent traffic control improvements combine such that there will be a noticeable reduction in the level of impact that is expected to occur due to development of either of these options as compared with the impacts outlined in the FEIS for the original Earlington Park project. Trip Generation I` A comparison of daily and PM peak hour trip generation was made using trip generation rates found in the traffic analysis for the Earlington Park project so the results could be directly compared. The results of this analysis are depicted on Table 1 and show that the daily trip generation associated with Options #1 and #2 are estimated to be 18,060 and 17,750 vehicles per day (vpd) , respectively. This is to be compared with the daily trip generation associated with the original Earlington Park proposal which was forecasted to generate 19,820 vpd. The evening peak hour traffic volumes will also decrease from the 2,660 vph level associated with the Earlington Park proposal to 2,230 and 2,190 vph for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. This The Mr. Loren Davis TRANSINovember22, 1983 Page 3 wow reduction is due to several factors. Primary among them is the reduc- tion of the total building land area from 109.31 acres to 81.28 acres. This has resulted in a reduction in the total building area from 1,980,880 square feet to 1,416,230 square feet and 1,387,260 square feet for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. Further, the proposed site coverage was reduced. These factors offset the increased propor- tion of more intensive uses like business park and office. Truck Traffic As indicated above, the percentage of trucks in the traffic stream is expected to reduce sharply as a result of the decrease in heavy ware- housing activity. Under the Earlington Park proposal , between 2,710 and 6,070 trucks per day were estimated to be generated. Under Option #1, this truck volume reduces to between 1,060 and 5,365 trucks per day, and Under Option #2, the reduction is from 1,575 to 5,145 trucks per day. See Table 2. During the PM peak hour, the Earlington Park proposal would generate between 65 and 170 trucks per hour, while development Option #1 would generated between 70 and 145 trucks per hour. Option #2 contains some light warehousing, and the reduction is therefore somewhat less than Option #1 and ranges between 40 and 150 trucks per hour. On a daily basis, truck traffic could reduce between 15 to 60 percent, while during the evening peak hour volumes could reduce as much as 38 percent. The significant aspect of these reductions is that the traffic impact of each heavy truck is equivalent to between 2 and 4 passenger vehicles. This is because the heavier trucks move more slowly and have operating characteristics that are less responsive than passenger vehicles. Thus, while the actual reduction in heavy truck trips may be 700 to 1,700 trucks per day, it may have an impact equivalent to a reduction of 1,400 to 6,000 passenger vehicle trips. Based on the review of trip generation characteristics outlined above in combination with the improvements that are proposed as well as improve- ments that have already been made to intersection design and signaliza- tion, this analysis indicates that development under Option #1 or Option 2 would have traffic impacts that would be noticeably less severe than those outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Earlington Park development (FEIS, February 1981) . j1 I19 I I 1 The Mr. Loren Davis T RANISP C November 22, 1983 CrOVp Page 4 I trust this letter responds to your questions regarding changes in traffic impacts that result from redefinition of the development profile for the Earlington Park/Washington Technical Center project. If you or the City of Renton have any questions regarding our findings and conclu- sions, I encourage you to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. David D. Markley Principal DDM/lf Attachments Table 1 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Trip Generation Rate Trip Generation Use Building Land Area Site Building Daily PM Peak Daily PM Peak Acres Sq.Ft. Coverage Area Original EIS Heavy Warehousing 774,490 5 9 3,870 700 Light Warehousing 377,340 6 9 2,270 340 Business Park 338,470 10 1.3 3,380 440 Office 490,580 21 2.4 10,300 1,180 Total 109.31 1,980,880 19,820 2,660 Option #1 Business Park 60.96 2,655,420 40% 1,062,170 10 1.3 10,620 1,380 Office 20.32 885,140 40% 354,060 21 2.4 7,440 850 Total 81.28 3,540,560 40% 1,416,230 18,060 2,230 Option #2 HdK Business Park 7.04 306,660 40% 122,660 10 1.3 1,230 160 Office 21.13 920,420 40% 368,170 21 2.4 7,730 880 FCE Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 45% 520,430 6 9 3,120 470 Business Park 13.28 578,480 35%202,460 10 1.3 2,020 260 Office 13.28 578,480 30% 173,540 21 2.4 3,650 420 Total Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 520,430 6 9 3,120 470 Business Park 20.32 885,140 325,120 10 1.3 3,250 420 Office 34.41 1,498,900 541,710 21 2.4 11,380 1,300 Table 2 TRUCK VOLUME SUMMARY Heavy Truck Volumes Use Daily PM Peak He Original EIS Heavy Warehousing 1570 - 2750 35 - 7C Light Warehousing 880 - 1540 15 - 3E Business Park 260 - 1030 15 - 3E Office 0 - 750 0 - 3C Total 2710 - 6070 65 - 17( Option #1 Business Park 1060 - 4250 70 - 14C Office 0 - 1115 0 - E Total 1060 - 5365 70 - 14E Option #2 HdK Business Park 125 - 490 10 - lE Office 0 - 1115 0 - 4E FCE Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 4E Business Park 200 - 810 10 - 2E Office 0 - 545 0 - 2C Total Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 4E Business Park 325 - 1300 20 - 4( Office 0 - 1660 0 - 6E Total 1575 - 5145 40 - 15( AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King SUE E L L I S TO N being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 12th day of January 19 83 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn to me this 12thday of January 1983. Not : Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton therein. Ili 11 Application, Petition or Case : HOLV I C K, deREGT, KOER I NG : SA-081-83 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) January 12, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING FILE NO. SA-081- 83 LOCATION: Approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of three (3) one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1) two-story tilt-up concrete building with a total of 66,000 square feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval, subject to conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on January 3, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 10, 1984, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following were entered into the record by the Examiner: Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff report, and other pertinent documents pertaining to posting and publication. Exhibit #2: Site Plan which also shows some schematic landscaping. The staff report was presented by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He stated the applicant is requesting a site plan approval to allow development of the next + 4.3 acres of building area in Phase 1 of Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed is for 66,000 square feet of building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up building; that this phase is located immediately south of the present buildings which have been approved under site plan approvals SA-094-81 and SA-065-83. Mr. Blaylock further stated the applicant has provided the city with the proper utility easements for the site, and that the surrounding area is developing into a business park setting also. He also noted it is difficult to estimate the number of trips per day this will generate, but it has been estimated at between 263 average trips as proposed, to 1,146 average trips if the site were developed based on maximum parking for office use HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 2 It was pointed out that the site plan complies with the modified approved plat for Washington Technical Center; that this plat was modified under boundary line adjust (LLA-016- 83) to move the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3 on which the project is proposed to be developed; that the utility easements are in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be granted subject to vacation of utility easements by the City Council. Mr. Blaylock stated the staff recommends approval of the request, subject to the release of utility easements by the City Council. The Examiner called on the applicant or representative. Responding was: Loren Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Davis indicated the applicant concurs with the staff report for this phase and they are keeping with the same atmosphere of the previous buildings; that they are seeing a good response to their endeavors in this area. Further, he stated it is the applicant's intention to landscape the next set of buildings similar to the ones already completed, and that they hope the utility easement will come before the Council shortly. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none. The Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the application. There was none. The Examiner closed the hearing at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt, Koering, filed a request for approval of a site plan for four new buildings in an M- P (Manufacturing Park) Zone. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration of Non--Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public. 6. The subject site is located near the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W., and is part of the Washington Technical Center at the site of the old Earlington Golf Course. 7. The site is level and covered with grasses and small shrubs. 8. The applicant proposes erecting four additional buildings as part of its phased development of the Technical Center. Buildings have already been erected north and northeast of the subject site. 9. The buildings will be tilt-up concrete buildings. Three of the structures will be one story (Buildings 16, 18 and 19), while one of the buildings (Building 17) will be a two-story building. The design will be consistent with the existing building in the complex. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 3 10. While the landscaping plans submitted with the application are not consistent with those already in place in the complex, the applicant has expressed willingness to install similar landscaping. 11. The buildings will contain approximately 66,000 sq. ft. of interior floor space. Parking will be provided for 266 vehicles. The parking space limits the mix of office and warehousing which may be contained within the buildings. A ratio of 50,000 sq. ft. of office and 16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing could be achieved under the parking constraints. 12. The applicant will have to meet the requirements of the Fire Department for access to all areas of the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest subject to a modification of the landscaping plans to tie in with the existing landscaping of the already constructed portion of the complex, and further subject to the approval of the city's landscape architect. 2. The applicant is limited to a certain mix of uses under the underlying environmental decisions regarding traffic impacts and is similarly governed in this respect by the parking requirements for office versus warehousing. The proposed 266 parking spaces would allow 50,000 sq. ft. of office space and 16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing. The Building and Zoning Department intends to monitor the mix of uses as development of the site proceeds and as a tenant mix is arrived at by the applicant. 3. Development will expand the opportunities and variety of options available for light industrial and office users and thereby broaden the economic base of the city. New employment opportunities should also be created by the additions to the Technical Center. DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1) modification of the landscaping plan to assure uniformity of design with existing development in the complex and subject to approval of the city's landscape architect; and 2) vacation by the City Council of the utility easements underlying the center of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 12th day of January, 1984. Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing., xaminer TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the parties of record: Larry Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 4 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 26, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1. t !4 4- ,,fi! , 11 - z- •< ' ' ' 'JJlGH' f. 1. S 3r I V A e 0... c kli II-':.' 4/::-777 i t ... 7-+•`- e j t 7-4 - j'; air q• D t . I f=•- Cv- t ' N\\\ wry / I ' . ' f 7 k : ." /• -.• &i•,',Iii• /74; l7 r lik.... . ., jaL, _''I •• . C 0 iJ I : R-2 y . t as• / it ABANOONEO , \ \ 17. R-1 3tT1. I 4- 1") iltr sw. - I N 1‘ 44k4,\\f- L. ,I 1 r ... e.- - • 1 .i I 4 0 M E T R W 1 1 21- . IL D I S P O S A I L I L_ O.c .4.;4a yI 14 I I 1111 .1 Frila4'''i t i Ttnilli, 1 S( in11I14,. ' <, yiI 1...1 \ 8. 1 1flo,...„_.,:. .....___.____........,,.......:____r,____________ Ligokill , _ . :I Tifl 0 IliLilt.,'.' : I." i A .. 1 !, /,..„...., Aistipidds ii-reig; 011.111± 414 0_.: =7-2=ilyE0 -: t Li.....4.: 1„, _.,:P AliAk .....1.00000,010.1,-'"---prillillAillPk HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES I I' PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P,' MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USEli COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK COMMENTS Ii I CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 10, 1984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBRS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. HOLVICI , deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business par:; and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. GEORGE SMITH SHORT PLAT Application to short plat 1.88 acres of property into three (3) lots. One lot of the short plat will be used for an automated car wash with the remaining lots left undeveloped, file SH. PL. -084-83; property located at the southeast corner of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83) Application to rezone 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L-1 for future light industrial development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307 Maple Avenue S.W. and 325 S.W. 13th Street. CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83) Application for preliminary prat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to redesign and replat Cedar Ridge residential park of + 30.7 acres from a multi-family attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes totaling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83; property located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E. 0496Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 10, 1984 APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-081-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of three (3) one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1) two-story tilt-up concrete building with a total of 66,000 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt, Koering 11[' 2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt, Koering 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. II I 5. Size of Property: 4.3 acres 6. Access: Powell Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; I -1, Light Industry; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on December 30, 1983, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on December 30, 1983. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 of April 14, 1959, and rezoned from G, General Use, to M-P, Manufacturing Park by Ordinance #3344 of August 17, 1979. A site plan for the subject site was submitted in 1981 SA-101-81), but never reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject site is relatively flat. 2. Soils: Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo), slopes are less than 2%. Permeability is moderately slow. The available water capacity is high. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops, pasture and urban development. PRELIMINARY REPOR1 10 THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83 JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 2 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by grasses, heather, and scrub trees. 4. Wildlife: The vegetation on the subject property is sufficient to provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: Ponding on areas of the site was observed on December 14, 1983, during a field study to the site. 6. Land Use: The subject site is presently undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Development in the area surrounding the subject property consists of office and warehouse uses to the north; warehousing and an industrial park to the east; and undeveloped property to the south and west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water - A twelve-inch water main extends east--west on S.W. 7th Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W. b. Sewer - A ten-inch sanitary sewer is located on Powell Avenue S.W. c. Storm Water Drainage. •- The subject site drains into Springbrook creek. No on-site storm water retention is required. No compensating flood storage is required. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Route #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way approximately 800 feet south of the subject site. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, p. 31-35. 2. Policies Element, City of Renton Comrprhensive Plan Compendium, Industrial Goals and Objectibes, p. 18-19. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: Construction on the site will remove the vegetation. disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Proper development controls and procedures can mitigate the identified impacts of site development. 2. Population/Employment: Minor. More information is necessary to determine the actual impact of the utilization of the site for business park warehouse uses on employment in the Renton area. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Minor. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83 JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 3 5. Traffic: The traffic impact of the proposed project is difficult to determine without any indication as to precentage of business park use versus warehouse use. The project as proposed is expected to generate 263 average daily trips Traffic Engineering estimate). However, if the site were developed for office use based on maximum parking (worst case), then 1,146 average daily trips would be generated (based on 21 ADT per 1,000 square feet). J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordiriaru:e and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended. RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on December 7, 1983. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt & Koering, is requesting site plan approval to allow development of the next +4.3 acres of building area in Phase 1 of Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed 66,000 square feet of building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up building. The proposal is located immediately south of the present buildings approved under site plan approvals (SA-094-81 and SA-065-83). 2. The proposal, as submitted, complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site and the present M-P, Manufacturing Park zoning. 3.The specific site plan complies with the modified approved plat for Washington Technical Center. This plat was modified under boundary line adjustment (LLA-016-83) to move the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3 on which the project is proposed to be developed. The utility easements are in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be granted subject to vacation of utility easements by the City of Renton City Council. 4. Public services to the site have been provided through the completion of Phase 1 of the plat. Minor modifications will result with the actual development of the site. In 1982, a variance was granted to allow joint use access on the common property lines, File V-014-82. This variance is still valid. The site plan as presented utilizes a joint use access on the northern property line only. 5.The parking as shown complies with the dimensional requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Based upon the 266 parking spaces provided, only 50,000 sq. ft. out of the total 66,000 sq. ft. proposed can be utilized for office space. The remaining 16,000 sq. ft. would be categorized as light warehousing. As tenant improvements occur in the buildings, the Building and Zoning Department will keep track of required parking per use. 6. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance subject to the provision that access roadways from Phase 1 to the north are to be extended through Phase 2 to a minimum standard for design required by the Fire Code. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83 JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 4 7. Based upon the maximum number of parking spaces available on site, a traffic generation estimate was completed using the criteria established in the draft Environmental Impact Statement to determine if the project was still within the scope of the original EIS for Phase 1. Average daily trips ADT) for Phase 1 were estimated in the DEIS to 6,660. Any development that would exceed that number for Phase 1 would require a supplemental evaluation of traffic impacts. The following table shows trip generation as actually developed in Phase 1 at this time and proposed in Phase 1-C SA-081-83). The total to date would account for 1,848 trips which is well within the limits established for Phase 1. TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATED IN D.E.I.S. DAILY AND PM PEAK HOUR Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr 2060 370 2265 340 2335 305 0 0 6600 1015 11 1815 325 0 0 1050 135 5150 590 8015 1050 TOTAL 3875 695 2265 340 3385 440 5150 590 14,675 2065 ACTUAL - Phase One Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Bldg 12 331 38 331 38 Bldg 13 20 2 109 12 129 14 Bldg 14 205 23 205 23 Bldg 3 37 5 37 5 3,677 Occupied) 20 2 37 5 645 73 702 80 PROPOSED - Phase I-C Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Bldg 16 16,000 square feet light warehousing Bldg 17 50,000 square feet office Bldg 18 Bldg 19 96 14 1050 120 1146 134 Total to Date 116 16 37 5 1695 193 1848 214 8. Departmental comments have been attached for the Hearing Examiner's and the public's review. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site approval request, SA-081-83, be approved subject to the release of utility easements by the City Council. ri G~' 4Y S rr 1{ e 7.1S, r , vi-f/.. .4'1, NJ -4.;.1,,,,41w iit ri71- 1 isl' l J I yy_:4.47 ,7'.• 40-0, 0 waft* z:L-st f U l 1'4,5• fT 4;i3-A —56 4 1 `\` \\ 5 re, R-1 P` S 1 i I'I I L.I I tN I i 1 M-1 i M E T R 1 i i' p-1 1 v 1, .. IS PO 5 AIL L.- am, -" D r 11TSTL_I;;;;_ 5;;i t.,,1 II11 r I;i minmill it I j 111 I ( iil(111u MI N` fIT ' i U`, L1 4000001111- 11.------lik .' \ 1 AL- 1 •. ' :• .T1 1 I moA 1 R k., .....ae.---- 11110.4 HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P,- MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK COMMENTS 1 • P.M I.1,14 miaow rata. jt.sZairrai.=......... 4111111k .Mk .."-ii.c.......r J.,......7 Mr .1°. .li1P.1' 777-77 7-777-1 • • ' I ' il17. H i • • 11e0iii 1 ___ ____I I ; I ' 1,1.0114-- diti. i ' - . .i........._, 1,, I 1 p4.3. 1110 I g....,....1,..,...----) 4;1 in -1- 1. •i I 1 / I. 0 --11Z,NI I •,. 1 ._ -- - e I ttilTsai"114rIlan .- e— 1 ' ,..t=1 '' ..4• I i 1GI L• I I I Al\AL 9 1111, . i-.-. —... I I 1 i i 1...... I1 . ' /— i tiani""...'"') a- • , t r-r7-1- 1 • \. (3, -• .€7)-- AIL I c--1111f AO• I 1. NOP' I 1 II .'-! ';'. 4 . ' • 1 r 1 1 s,... "Nr;•isi ...4,:e:,.... iit .1)0(....i... 1mei 'I,'-. 1".•'•1 1!,V.i?. '1,....'L 15riall-,7.4::: ••,,4-_--. 1:1,.,.' 21.:f.11.4- ---'-..r-4...,•-r.,..• 11 _•.'),* ..11.01.•••741 _••-- .•7!...Tra', ... •,,a,;'..• oe..t ililinem...no w••.,••,...MIABIO-70.-.•2... '...4_I....T7,.WIIII-44.0.•! ''IV".,' 1 Al.:. s.'t:7 7:•. e- AT., LiVe.-I in.7',. ;;..-• SITE PLAN I ALA is s 111Q't LA-1 4!..,••• 5,-- .-----1 GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST Uss s•ss ,P 1 szfal1 cm. •&•••.=rim or ...l.OM OP ill. 'arm. alma••••mnss• MON= II N.M.. 6.......-,... . .. 0.1.10. IP PM&e•4:eillhot as 'whir, ,Nollau.• alma/MY••• A Ve•-11.01-.= mMno"‘4"11411A" • r l, NIC.21.1C• 101.01.1M10 I CI, .' .4.. 7. 1 n ina.MIRING Mohll .11:42.7...t MN,1.101.1%.. 1.W!UR. r-410=11 Warw.tau IN 11117•10.3.111 DLL 1,41.10•11 AMU . 7: '::... THE. 0 MAEFEJMr..,. 1-n i---, 3U—...., t.,'..-... -ss-••-rn GRc_xy z ARCHITECTS w• 71 F.1 4.1 Stu Il. Nolo.Yu 4I 111 11 flaw rl. 1-1 ll...I. Si\.lt.ut...I` If Iva Plow Pion i I-. M.II 1st.Mutt..P. T_ —_ _ 4) P.I.,. IL.r..Illy.II.\.4/ ANSI.Kl.6..VI.NM N llq.Y II..Il.11wM1.yllll.a. Sl.) 1Pd { ll...1.1 II \11 WOOS yyyi l r r 4 I-II Sly.Ir bl1 yal.. an u> 1t Ily. l. uuuu .I. . . \ ll. T...............4Y Mul tea.!t 116.7...1 le 1 1 ilfi I I it 11 P d 1 1 f I 1 .- r.,_ 3 ' 1 ILA WING 1• - 1 i I 4 _._.,_ I i will. 1 j ) I7 1 MOM..Litir • 1s Y re . 1 4_.ate.__ .., t • a...a li,—.r_?° f t R i e ' it' ''' . ' . I ar g Lp1N fNA3l 3A f ry R1.0•lG A 1 lAo•1G 17 c` 1 - Z1 st.e A !!LLLi,.__ f .z tr . I r•d l>z. r t' d 1- E .. I -lit M 1 .,.. 64 mom 1 VICINITY MAP jl"..j 2 y 1 u- titti{.*AA 11111.11111111. I \ i I Y.._s-I...r, 1 i ij I I ww...s a w.w-.r.ow..1.1 ,\ WV uwr Y• toll Y In ..,. it— — y POWEII AVE.S.W. 1 7 r_ SITE PLAN'11w 5 GENERAL NOTES 3 A-1 r- TH.77 E MAD-TUNA f GROUP er"1O ARCHITECTS t e:l c 1 Z I l KtV1tW1N6 DEPAKTMENT/DIVISION : ID APPROVED Al . ..OVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED z7777 II i I i DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO'OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : t47L. fry r A/FiAl6-67.0M:5- El APPROVED r-i APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL Suryth,i i l 1 IAT -COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER Wm LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER 110 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER yEc } Q, G4 AT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER S .PT. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CURSE - SEWER n/p YAPPROVEDWATERPLANES 1466 APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS I BY FIRE DEPT. Y'c FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 1 l5C' Ift06 D R T DATE: / - SIGNATURE 0 73 I EC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 KtVItWINU UtrAKIMNI/v1V1JlUIN : tea f f L L -i4 e- t/ OAPPROVED J APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Ih i' r i 6 371 1 ) DATE : /; /S J /SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 fl APPROVED AI OVED WITH CONDITIONS flNOT APPROVED 11,1/5 7 M e eAt r 410,140 r , re7Ui remeitiS r- p j'C to. Use 0-ye‘th` e 7 2i/relnaffittifil# W04044.0"0-1 DATE : I 7 gl SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :SAL— f —.- I'APPROVED r-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED f I DATE: //2 — /- SIGNATU550 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ri APPROVED FlAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS t 1 NOT APPROVED Ff-jx'G c/:-7,4t, !'5 -.OA, C.:.)047-4T/4_U y -4•c. O,e, 5, T -- i4 c /t,1G i%A;E f itrc C 7 u T/7=e7 rev .lam - /li,,(, t1 L 0—A.4.49,24',e) $" a iore e ,ram Tipy fir, e2 C 1 l DATE: 4,— /1f2 SIGNATURE ,QF' 9 RE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 a.1-r .v. I I i‘.i, 1 OL ILLLLCL LR1. UH I G . -- I n ENGINEERING DIVI )N L I TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-1/-84 1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION F-- FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS t ( NOT APPROVED i1‘ A--A. vk s DATE : 4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOROR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0/APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED DATE: l SIGNATUR' OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SA -081-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-071-83 Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing. Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew, David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-071-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 14, 1983. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERG has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and the following requirement shall be complied with: 1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code. SIGNATURES: tl Z1/0 -11A, _16(71/71 Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ri and C. Houghton Public Works Directo PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983 APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 _ 83 APPLICATION No(s ) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE STORY TILT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO STORY TILT up CONC. 131.D . rUN A '1 tT1Y1L ur b6,000 SQ. FT. OF BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WARFEOUSINC. LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Grose ) : 66,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : X 4) Plant Life:X 5) Animal Life: X 6) Noise: X 7) Light & Glare: X 8) Land Use; North: WA MOUSE/OFFICE East :WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK South: UNDEVELOPED West :UNDEVELOPED Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPA'TtD 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X _ 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 TRIP FADS (1.363 100% OFFICE-WOP,ST_CASE) Traffic Impacts : ___WIESECTI ONS OF S.W. 7th & HARDIE AVE. SWI GRADY & POf ALL A\ 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History:X Signatures : 1(7 z(sityz. Ronald G. Nelson bavid A. Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director 1j2„.(144,0(C . PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983 Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE DEC. 26. 1983 Public Works Director 6-83 ERC-06 FORM #7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON BY THERENTON LAND USE HEARINGAPUBLICHEARINGWILLBEHELDR EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83) Application to rezone + 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L- 1 for future light industrial development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307 Maple Avenue S.W. and 32:; S.W. 13th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : December 30, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the 30th day of December, 1983. OF RF cy z 0 0, 9A 01 4-0 SEPS : O City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC i n CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JANUARY 10, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.lv . CONCERNING: FILE SA-081-83 1 REZONE From_ To _ SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To x SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lou PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM i S GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT To BE REMOVED WITHOL FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SA-081-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-071-83 Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing. Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew, David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-071-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 14, 1983. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and the following requirement shall be complied with: 1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code. SIGNATURES: I( R nald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric and C Houghton Public Works Directo PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983 APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983 Y 411111 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 071 _ 83 APPLICATION No(s ) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINI'ON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT3ONE STORY TILTDescriptionofProject :TO T LT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 NO STORY •1'1E1' up C:UNU. 131.113. rU.Ft A '1U1AL Ur' b6,000 SQ. FT. OF I BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WAREHOUSING LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWF T L AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : 66,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : IA IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE• INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/ Indirect Air Quality: X 3 ) Water & Water Courses : X 4 ) Plant Life:X 5) Animal Life : X 6 Noise: X 7) Light & Glare : X 8) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE/OFFICEIOUSE/OFFICE East :WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK South: UNDEVEppEp West :UNDEVELOPED Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources : l X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 • ix IDS (1,363 100% OFFICE-WORST CASE) Traffic Impacts : INI`ESECTI ONS. OF S.W. 7th & HARDIE AVE. SW GRADY & POWW1EL.L A 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History:X Signatures : 7„<„,ityc -c X /X lei Ronald G. Nelson avid . Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director C - PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983 Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE DEC. 26, 1983 Public Works Director 6-83 ERC-06 FORM #7 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 14 ° DATE: i SIGNATURE OF DIRECTORJOR A THORIZED REPR SENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 v---_ I on REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP I•MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : E] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 1--] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 12[POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P,M , ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED IIl' DATE , SIGNATUR OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 r,_ Inn r REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP fMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINUS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : i IPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 12DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 1?DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1R) r REN1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 l ] ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT l ] POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : arkL /1 NarAIEee'Ahc APPROVED 1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS f NOT APPROVED I UTILITY APPROVAL SbbiiLC tit 1 LA1 4GMERS AGREEMENT WATER e I LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER NO ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER YE<-_ )if., ,, G1¢ 21.AT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER Y ; D.At /ss,fr. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER o + p1.b"16 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER A/0 A Pp/tb APPROVED WATER PLAN yk-5 NV M APPROVED SEWER PLAN ES APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. Yt-5 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS YES ___I fr.Ilit DATE: At - V.3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN- I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : I ! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION 15<TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 I ] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : af) E'<< OAPPROVED O APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED tPDATE , S5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEH'REPRESENTATIVE j REVISION 5/1982 i o n REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 071 - 83 NOV 3 0 1983 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 Po,I('„ DEVELOPMFNT nFPT. PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT EAPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Acme 1?tVcLOP,,,e,y7 n APPROVED Rid-D.-PROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 16 fm eSi// ',kir', : 404 e "twor ref u remeids v4) r- !>tieje P Use 0-'4 5 •10,7 JL 0 ARA.#14......, DATE: 147 g I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1 RENI1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPOTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET If ECF 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ELBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ei OTHERS : li COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :j P APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED III Ili DATE : /2 - v SIGNATUR IRECTOR OR AU ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET emu V •iJ ECF 071 - 83 NOV, 3 0 1983 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION i i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION giFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EllPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2 I ] APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED 44=ic'GiG,40//,- SA) C.),4 C./TiL e'/E:02 ,Qe.G 6rG%1--• .c 'A) t"B f ieoTEG%7 , nxvIJGJ 's. viage .r Tv 771-/ct /00277"/ 43E 7f: 1(1,0°,E'o(/6'.' /=',. ,47 c, 44 l .) 1//1n J"TA.te'fa.4/4rJS EQUi? p ay Ty E y// C vz,e- DATE: a\- / 2 SI TURE E TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 I TON BUILDING & ZONING ARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP-074-83) . PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-075-83) PROPONENT :CASCADE PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : REPLAT OF CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD APPROVAL TO REDESIGN AND REPLAT CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK FROM A MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED ENVIRON- MENT TO A NEIGHBORHOOD OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES TOTALING 138 UNITS, LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1800 LAKE YOUNGS WAY S.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-16-83 EIENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON NOVEMBER 15, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l l NOT APPROVED Z) r V a v.ei-e_ O 3) 7,2 atie Ls- -74 ikd J r a •c.!a+S -- Jv- 5 'ft.`i/u a. Ct-; 1/-;1-(_, 7:7 7/e?._ Cr21/ jsiArr- DATE : i(lry f-3 SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 061 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983III ENIVIIRONHEI TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET II 1 it ECF - 071 - 83 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No ( s ) . SA-081-83 NOV 3 0 1983 1I, PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING POLICY jDEVELOPMcNTncpr. PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A j I! Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. 1 BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED I.OR A BUSINESS PARK ]U I-UK Lfb l WHREFTUU-3111ta.I LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. 3 1 SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :i - 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 1/...- 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : Qffteerbudern`. is east : Wa rt Nv, Rare f? is I rk south : /jj evelo 4 west : II Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 40'" 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : 1363 R DT(ASso,K e, loo16 err'lice Vr i eta rS,' ) III traffic impacts : rrj 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : v 18 ) Aesthetics : Y 19 ) Recreation : lj 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : jjs `n O6S-e3 ve off'cvs-p.e.e * Itc,dech neeO5 ec, /dion i r li i o1-till l m1'17tii4v1617 imoSe1jy01 t 'E' o n. s s a rye.` Id/Orr a.04-1632, f3,) Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 5 US0r.. 1 i t 1 e : 16f%f I,K HK r Date : Ice/4/R. FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR tIl f(T WARtvamt1Th. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : J(1 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics: 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI X DOS More Information, Reviewed by :Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED l-OR A BUSINESS PARK / ND IUK LEAJ WARtriUU TTQG. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : i/Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information 1 Reviewed by :o-- X T itle : C Date : 6 FORM: ERC-06 e )O ' Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 EINIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No(s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND 1-UK L111111 OREgOusrMta. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : tf 4) Plant life : 1/ 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : L/ 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1/ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : r/ COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date : L Z S 3 Z FORM: ERC-06 TR RFFit Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIROINIMEINITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED -FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR tllattl WA-n r1. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life :4 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : t 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 6,3 ta( ti A traffic impacts : kf" t`'5 4.a P Erna/ azc u v/afi.e e a• 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : L 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI G DOS More Information Reviewed by : ()//,,. 1 itle : Date : A/6" .f FORM: ERC-06 r a route Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 EINIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 071 - 83 Ij APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 11 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSI-NESS PARK AND FUR WARtnunI1Th. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) ; traffic impacts : k 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : hale : Date : /,? FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIROINIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deRLGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.I { BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK -MU I-IIK LIVNT wxxt Utls1 w. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : vf 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : v/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNS DOS More Information Reviewed by : 1 itle :jL/TANG/tlE/ Date :3 FORM: ERC-06 rI IZ6 Date circulated : NuvEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEM SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR LIbHll W -u-i LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : d 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendatio • DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by . Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTO01 The Environmental Review Committer (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83) Application for preliminary plat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to redesign and replat Cedar Ridge residential park from a multi-family attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes totalling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83; property located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E. SHOEM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-069-83) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of a five story office building having 13,440 square feet of usable office space, file SA-073-83, and variance from Section 4-712A(b) to allow building height to exceed thirty-five (35) feet, file V-079-83; property located at 1420 Maple Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PHASE 2A)(ECF-071-83) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildinos and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. D & D FLOOR COVERING (ECF-074-83) Application for building permit to allow construction of a building having 9,126 square feet to be used for retail/office and warehouse use, file B-302; property located at 345 Union Avenue N.E. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of EF- C action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by December 26, 1983. Published: December 12, 1983 r„, NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL 4 DECLARATION 3 A, APPLICATION NO. FILE SA-081-83 i'' - PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITF PI AN APPROVAI TO Al LOW CONSIRUCTIi N' OF THREE ONE STORY TTLT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND ONE TWO STORY IIlT IP CINrRFTE M.« BUILDING FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ. FT, TO BF USED FOR A BUS. PARK AND I T. WARFHOI I,S I NG, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS I; LOCATED AT APPR XI(IMMATELY THE 800 BLO .K OF POl I AVEN F S W. i -' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. 00. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DDOES 24DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 26, 1':3 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 ice^ -.Xt ' r'..,. f DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I ti( Y o TY OF RENTC FILE NO(S): _5j F -83 E: ® +BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTM` :NT MIME ru MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION i/ NAME P, c/vk-k, ds& X0ef I n FEES ADDRESS Q REZONE*(FROM TO 75 Po ll AvC , S,0, oo SPECIAL PERMIT* CIj ZIP 1 TEMPORARY PERMIT* J^ , 0 / L;A 160 55 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE# V v..l.w 1J SITE PLAN APPROVAL T",3Z5j 2/ ^ /2/.2. GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT GG.L.L.No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE From Section: NAME Justification Required Lo own., 126411S a ADDRESS v j SUBDIVISIONS: 725 /6.0E11 im • S. toD . Q SHORT PLAT C o / i _.& ZI4 E] TENTATIVE PLAT f/',/; ICyLtL' PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE V Q FINAL PLAT CO)I O L 222 0 WAIVER ll Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAM PLAT NAME: floivibk,k.c)._1---in6ADDRESSv ` PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 72 Pc to&l Ave • S.0. a PRELIMINARY CI 1 ZIPa FINAL k W n[ iC 5 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 2cX7) 22Co -/222 0 Residential Q Industrial 0 Commercial ED Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADORES ow^(Jl/ Ave ,SI , ' , Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENTCLZONING 0 PRELIMINARY Vet-C -4 -1);e/d MP J FINAL PROPOSED USE 1 PARK NAME: ci / iakcs c h(Jlldirns NUMBER OF SPACES: W/ paAIk * klthapi5 W ENVIRONMENTAL RE IE.4 COMM.CITI TEE 1 SQ. FT ACRES AREA: /66 j Jr7o 3 i U'.4L FEES 175os AfP USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING f1< 0 DATE a I 0 L U Lt'! 1_!7 'Li)APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: T CAX - i NOVvjY14JAPPLICATIONDETERMINEDTOBE: ElAccepted i ! s NC y,,E 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: V OV• 'O - 1 ED Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Q Building Q Design Eng. EJ Fire Parks Q Police ID Policy Dev. J Traffic Eng. Q Utilities REVISION 5/1QR2 r Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT I, Ct' being duly sworn, declare that I am a orized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS r DAY OF 19_ "<-) . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Name of Notary Public)ig iature of Owner) 1< Address) Address) 90.0S City) State) (Zip) z2G — lz0, Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 a GA 6, N i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY gas R t4T9idENVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTFORML.a t; , t,...4 ., , i:l . a NOV 141983uij FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . I3U:i DAGailiNIN(. JET i. Application No. 5A — 02/-63 Environmental Checklist No. c C i— O 7/-/P 3 t PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance ODeclaration of Significance i 0 Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: i 1 Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be ipreparedforallmajoractionssignificantlyaffectingthequalityoftheenvironment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a I proposal is such a major action. i I Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your 1 explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- E vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. i i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM i I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent JI/C)/1//4:ea41 4':Vt,/-7/ 52. Address and phone number of Proponent: 41 72 encoell 4V2 , S,I0, rte. Joo 3. Date Checklist submitted 4/LICI Anbe ' !995 4. Agency requiring Checklist G c5 /e i 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: tADCGV6i. TeC-AiLiczu ader - Phcz.. 2A 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and na ure) : Coh s-1rvc I ) s rci c . i/rb G 7c a , rccworby- o00 nit A. 4,' c:crt s d IO d. 1 1 ccn s`lrt-{ .D S Gtxp-6 5co.L2ulatiVe.gio_fi 'av a res • s k j' a 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the en"iron- mental setting of the proposal ) : i Ls; r e S g/ASs CaVP1`. 71 1e. C 5 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Svrnrrw - - /984 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : 11cCnd sah7 lt7/-- 41. coo c lit$ EledrI MQ- a.4.;Cid 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Yes . Ad ?k 0J k ((a)o i.. - Wes+r co E, 1. Si 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: Jo 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? TES- MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features?RV ATM' Ai d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? am jXbP - MAYBE e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES X- WATEE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? PEA— MAYBE gL Explanation: n Ire- a t CO 9Anktil 44/- a 0 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE N b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? 1ff MM YBE W6— c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE N d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Yt MAYBE N f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE O g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YEV MAYBE A 1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? A-MAYBE AExplanation: (b)A cD /c-t drzt.i e. ed i u/ be.. cia6Ked . co karma/ b.ryk Q G- Vcy. c U. coif Grcor: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: J a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,,] microflora and aquatic plants)? PIPIT A AU— b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Yrr- MAYBE ;11C- c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?V14- MAYBE W d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? vrr- t- Explanation: (a.) & i . /s r2t9161iES ii/l d nnaied--;as co;11 b ,4roccd. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YT MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES RA-YIT NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? ES MAYBE NO Explanation: iveA.0 etCdi / IL)//1 QCC-or . 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?YK MAYBE T. Explanation: Q on ~ SI f5 A Wit( b / k/. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES WPTIff NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Y M YBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? k E MAYBE W Explanation: N i p r), A tad/ LizQd cJc f. C.o 7rbceg8S riA tx.)/ / c, . 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Y! MAYBE N Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location. distri- bution, density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y MAYBE N Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? VET M O Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES M YBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? VET- 1 M YBE c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? yr MTTWE d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Yam- MAYBE M e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yam— MAYBE go-- f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YET— MAYBE N Explanation: A, . . AP_G • Ar _ 1 . . 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE Nb— b) Police protection?YK MAYBE kb— c) Schools? YES MAYBE 4- d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?41c— MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?i YES WATTE NO c Explanation: LEA // 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? XTMMAYBE b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require Y the development of new sources of energy? f,,, MAYBE F[ Explanation: 00) vif_ `k 71 jEl 4,34 j rz22u irC/, 4- E 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? FaTirr }3- b) Communications systems? Y E3 WATIlt +ice c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? A MAYBE WU— e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste and disposal? VES M Y8E NO Explanation: /Jr,s.L2J 5 !LCC4.. —LpS 40/V T. I 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? VET MAYBE N0' Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? FES MAYBE Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? VS- MAYBE 0 Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Yam- MAYBE Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I I' ase H F CITY O R((ENTON 1 NOV 14 1983 1 C I I I I 1 I I 1 I 100000.. I• 1 r y, 94• I 1 I Kim Lighting, Inc. SUBSIDIARY OF CORPORATION I 1 I I I I I Al '1 ,. , ,I ,, '.,"'"IN<'t I 11111'I 7 T""T.T T.._r-ViiiirirlikirAlriffirritri 40' Scope 38' 36' 34' 32' 30' 28' I•— 26'I,- 24' 22' 20' 18' 16' 14' 12' 10' EKG—Series 200 EKG—Series 100 EKG—Series 300 8' 6' 4' Phase II Phase I Phase III 2' 175 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 1000 Watt Applications Pedestrian ways Collector and local roads Major roads and whiteways Plaza areas Intermediate commercial Large parking lots Parks Medium size parking lots Expressways Residential roads Security lighting Sports areas Small parking lots Residential roads Security lighting Kim Lighting, Inc.Building entrances Highways Automobile dealers Printed in U.S A. s r C./TY Of RENTON L L A - 0/6-83 Y LE6AL 465CR/PTION r LOT / THE NORTH WOO fffT Of LOT 4 AND ALL 0f LOT 3 Of RE/TON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 002-83 AS RECORDED IN KING COUNTY RECORD Of SURVEY VOL. 34, PAGES 254 AND 2.54A UNDER RECORDViV6 MO 8301259002. 2 .: ,.. 4. LOT 2 LOT G Of RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 002-83 AS i}fEC 4'DED /N K/N6 COUNTY RECORD Cr SURVEY VOL. 34 PAGES 254 AND 254 A UNDER RECORDING' NO 8301259002. EXCEPT THE NORTH /d6.00 ffET TH/EREOf. APPROYALS TN/S RECORD Of SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED TO DOCUMENT. A LOT LINE REY/S/ON WITHIN Pt C/I7 L//,1/TS Of RENTON. EX4/1/NED AND APPROVED pm tor Of A.O. /983 ri Q/RECTOR - OffT a'PUBLIC NORA'S EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY Of AD 1983 T. GF 4 EXAt-//NED AND APPROVED T///S LO4Y Cr AD /983 r, ;:; :.:76- = k: Itl' 41 f h'/N6 COUNTY ASSESOR DEPUTY ASSESSOR i 4 1 i t. AD,Q NE*NE4 5EC 24, TefA/, Rd E 14%M A/G COUNTY, '4 //it/G7ON I Dos/5 OF BE4.Q/NG FCITY O/^ RFNTON+ 4- PLAT OF /'V45I////G7O/J Tff.UN/COL 4 ' Li' [1 ;! L5 i. CE,(/TE ' , I' L /ft, , 65 ,e- /Ot. ECOYQOS OF .-/.VG c0 dw..f,v N O V 14 i g83 I--) I/OTt 71//5 ORDw/AJG 5/1014' • LOT ylF wri.pi-. L/,VE REv/5/ON DA/L Y 4.'O 1' liO E45E,4,fEc//5, 7 11 '0 14110/ 44 LOT 4 I__ 1.-1FUTURE ! LOT i ----=:---- i _F I E , T. r- l, 1--i ...‘k... :---- - 1 r- / LOT i 1 L. S.W. SEVENTH ST. rr -------'ti-G-----—71- r. xeirillitnVJ on Industrial park1 C=--- -'-I-jf' 1 by burtington northern in FUTU i., EI ft------1 2 0G T'--;...1:-..i,:77T. ---c-' 1- ii 111 1 il---C Ims:0-, •„ PHASE 2A 1 ka al e • r., -:-3C: z 1 ..--- • ZIN .r.:Agt 1 .,1111 NORTH rTi..---... . -ELL isij SITE AI! ell WILA „, or CE VIOIROTV MAP CITY cf±: RENTON ........ iii 4 kri l,k7. . \'fr IC ii NOV 14 1983 i1. I 1:_____.:____ park entrance BUILDINGiL...;r,i:NG DEFT. 4 0•4 ,-------- FEET millnipaimm 0GIIP' - o 100 200 300 PROIECT wA-.51-11wc,-row erATE. TEC-HNICA.L- 1_1-rEg THE JOB NO. -- e!.1 ...____ MAEHLUM. DATE 11171;g9_, GROUP DETAIL vic-mirry MAP ARCF-IITECTS SCALE 1":-5oo'-o" 51-1._EET r 0E-i 0 Ca.leo Mat/- Tri -„,, 3, 5. !.! )rw ST. 1, ,,o A/BB'!3'GYJ' !f/ I\ . 1-ems.t4'• je-ofivpre" P=r ao i 6' d EX/9T£E54 e g7CDP l17',itIL a EX/ST is 0/J.c//NEQ PI s '/i089 Q00 s 046' NQ6'453'7Y l ‘%.AYE9 V'. LOT ifs . g i i2f/6/NAL LOT LINE wad•4csvr"0 46 I` S, t. rj}4.1 ti fir; gni46 J,P/DO /B051Q• 7.........."., Neff Z01C/NE v to • 8 io f Rs S 4 *-4 4OT. z • b b l04/ CITY OF RENTON • N, IL' tR61 I -' .'ttlr I z'• 1 S DiNOV14 "ij.:3r0 II 1 1 ITY OF RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE APPLICATION FEE APPEALS OF LAND-USE OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS 75 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 450 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW: Environmental Checklist Review/ Threshold Determination 55 if value less than $10, 000 60 plus $1 per $10,000 if value greater than $10, 000 Pre-Draft Consultation Report $100 plus $25 per acre Environmental Impact Statement, Draft and Final (Costs of Coordination and Review) 100 plus equivalent of City cost incurred Environmental sensitive land or lands covered by water 11 times the above listed fees GRADING AND FILLING PERMITS 300 plus $25 per acre LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS 50 MOBILE HOME PARKS: Tentative 150 plus $1 per acre Preliminary 300 plus $5 per lot Final 150 plus $2 . 50 per lot 1111 OPEN SPACE 30 PLATS: Short Plat , Residential/ 300 Commercial/Industrial 75 plus $1 per 1 ,000 square feet (not less than $175) Tentative Plat 150 plus $2 per acre Preliminary 300 plus $8 per lot Preliminary Industrial 600 plus $1 per 1 , 000 square feet of land area Final 225 plus $4 per lot Final Industrial 375 plus $10 per acre P.U. D. : Preliminary Plan 750 plus $20 per acre with 1 , 000 maximum Final Plan 750 plus $20 per acre REZONE 300 plus $10 per acre SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 100 if value is less than $50, 000 1111 150 if value from $50, 000 to 100, 000 200 plus . 01 % of value over 100, 000 IBITE APPROVAL 300 plus $ 5 per acre SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY PERMIT/ CONDITIONAL PERMIT 300 plus $10 per acre VARIANCE 75 if value is less than $2, 500 - 150 if $2, 500 or greater. WAIVER OF IMPROVEMENTS 75 ENDING OF FILE II FILE TITLE 6/ I