Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD_SEA HOUSER CUP Administrative Report_LUA17000871DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Location Map A. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT & DECISION DECISION: APPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS DENIED REPORT DATE: April 25, 2018 Project Name: SEA Houser Way Verizon Owner: Seattle Opera, 1655 N 4th ST, Renton, WA 98057 Applicant: Mike Cunningham, Verizon Wireless, 3245 158th Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98008 Contact: Becky Todd, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 Project Number: PR17-000669 File Number: LUA17-000871, CU-A Project Manager: Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner Project Summary: Verizon Wireless is requesting an administrative conditional use permit for a proposed wireless communication facility (WCF) on the rooftop of an existing commercial warehouse building located at located at 1655 N 4th ST (Parcel no. 1352301205). The property is 33,020 square feet (0.76 acres), and located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone and Urban Design District D. The parcel has a Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Commercial Mixed Use. The property currently has an existing 21,981 square foot warehouse building, which is proposed to be retained. The applicant proposes to locate the WCF on the rooftop of the warehouse on the west side of the building. All equipment associated with the WCF would be concealed within one enclosure, painted and textured to match the stucco finish of the existing building. The enclosure would rise 15 feet above the existing roof. The applicant has not proposed any new impervious surface, ground disturbance, or alterations to existing landscaping with this project. High seismic hazards and wellhead protection area zone 2 are mapped on the project site. Project Location: 1655 N 4th ST Site Area: 33,020 square feet City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 2 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon B. EXHIBITS: The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Staff Report Project Description and Statement of Compliance Exhibit 3: Site Plan and Elevations Exhibit 4: Structural Analysis and Design Report Exhibit 5: Photo Simulations Exhibit 6: Site Selection Information C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Seattle Opera, 1655 N 4th ST, Renton, WA 98057 2. Zoning Classification: Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) 4. Existing Site Use: Warehouse Building 5. Critical Areas: High Seismic Hazards and Wellhead Protection Area Zone 2 6. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Right-of-Way (N 4th St); High Industrial (IH) Zoning and Employment Area (EA) land use designation. b. East: Warehouse; Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning and Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) land use designation. c. South: Right-of-Way (alley), office building, single family residence, and Pump Station; Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning and Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) land use designation. d. West: Office building; Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning and Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) land use designation. 6. Site Area: 33,020 square feet D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 5758 06/22/2015 Zoning N/A 5758 06/22/2015 Annexation N/A 156 05/23/1909 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 3 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Existing Utilities a. Water: Water service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 6-inch City water main located in N 4th ST. b. Sewer: Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 24-inch gravity wastewater main located in N 4th ST. There is an existing 8-inch gravity wastewater main located in the alley to the south. c. Surface/Storm Water: There is an existing 15-inch stormwater main located in N 4th ST. 2. Streets: The property fronts N 4th ST along the north property line. N 4th ST is a Residential Street with an existing right of way (ROW) width of 60 feet as measured using the King County Assessor’s Map. There is an existing sidewalk along N 4th ST. The property fronts N 4th Alley along the south property line. N 4th Alley is a Residential Street with an existing ROW width of 16 feet as measured using the King County Assessor’s Map. No frontage improvements currently exist along N 4th Alley. 3. Fire Protection: Renton Regional Fire Authority F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts 1. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts 2. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations 1. Section 4-3-050: Critical Area Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards 1. Section 4-4-140: Wireless Communications Facilities 4. Chapter 9 Permits a. Section 4-9-030: Conditional Use Permit 5. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Utilities Element H. FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF): 1. The applicant is requesting an Administrative Conditional Use Permit Review for the installation of a new roof-mounted wireless communication facility (WCF). 2. The applicant submitted the application for review on December 28, 2017. The Planning Division of the City of Renton determined the application incomplete on January 12, 2018, and determined the application complete on March 6th, 2018, following submittal of a complete application. The project complies with the 120-day review period. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 4 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon 3. The project site is located at 1655 N 4th ST (Parcel #1352301205). 4. The property currently has an existing 21,981 square foot Seattle Opera warehouse building, which is proposed to be retained. The majority of the site is impervious surface, including the warehouse building and associated parking. Ornamental trees are located on site along N 4th ST. No change to impervious surface area or vegetation removal is proposed with the instalation of the rooftop WCF. 5. Access to the site is provided via an existing curb cut off of N 4th ST. 6. The site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within the Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) Comprehensive Plan land use designation. 7. Siesmic Hazards are mapped on the project site; however, no excavation is proposed with the project application. Due to the scope of work, City staff have waived the requirement for a geotechnical study. The applicant will need to submit an engineer’s certification that the support structure’s design meets the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision G Standard, at the time of building permit application. 8. The proposal is SEPA exempt, per WAC 197-11-800(25)(a)(ii). 9. No site excavation is proposed with the project application. 10. Staff received no public or agency comments. 11. Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. 12. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: The site is designated Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands in the CMU designation are intended to transform strip commercial development into business districts through the intensification of uses and with cohesive site planning, landscaping, signage, circulation, parking, and the provision of public amenity features. The proposal is compliant with the following Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies if all conditions of approval are met: Compliance Comprehensive Plan Analysis  Policy U‐79. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses.  Policy U‐80. Require wireless communication structures and towers to be designed and site to minimize aesthetic impacts and to be co-located on existing structures and towers wherever possible.  Goal L-BB: Maintain a high quality of life as Renton grows by ensuring that new development is designed to be functional and attractive.  Goal L-FF: Strengthen the visual identity of Renton and its Community Planning Areas and neighborhoods through quality design and development. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 5 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon 13. Zoning Development Standard Compliance: The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone and in the Urban Design District D on the City’s Zoning Map. The purpose of the CA Zone is to evolve from “strip commercial” linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning and pedestrian orientation, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment with greater densities. The CA Zone provides for a wide variety of retail sales, services, and other commercial activities along high- volume traffic corridors. Residential uses may be integrated into the zone through mixed -use buildings. The purpose of the design requirements in Urban Design District D is to implement policies established in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Although the design requirements for structures in Urban Design District D are not applicable to wireless communication facilities, the design and siting of new towers or equipment should be compatible with the goals and overall intent of the design regulations. All new wireless communication facilities are required to meet the standards and requirements in RMC 4-4-140 in lieu of the typical development standards based on zoning designation. Compliance Wireless Communication Facility Standards Analysis Compliant if condition of approval is met a. Equipment Shelters/Cabinets: 1. Location - Equipment shelters and cabinets used to house related equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground, unless it is infeasible. 2. Screening - Equipment shelters and cabinets shall be surrounded by a fifteen foot (15') wide sight obscuring landscape buffer around the outside perimeter of required security fencing with a minimum height that is no less than the height of the compound fence at any point. Existing topography, vegetation and other site characteristics may provide relief from the screening requirement 3. Size - The applicant shall provide documentation that the size of any equipment shelters or cabinets is the minimum necessary to meet the provider’s service needs. 4. Generators - i. Architectural integration is required (if applicable). ii. To the extent feasible, generators shall be enclosed along with the related equipment. Similar to equipment shelters, the screening for the generator shall utilize similar building materials, colors, accents, and textures as the primary building; if no buildings exist on site, ensure that the building is designed to blend in with the environment. iii. A screening wall and/or landscaping material shall be required to mitigate visual impacts. iv. Fences shall be constructed of materials that complement and blend in with the surroundings. v. Anti-graffiti finish shall be applied to all solid fences, walls, and gates. vi. A noise analysis shall be required to demonstrate that the generator will operate within allowed noise limits if the generator is the sole power source. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 6 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon Staff Comment: Verizon is proposing to construct an unmanned telecommunications facility on the rooftop of an existing commercial warehouse building. The antennas are proposed to be installed on the rooftop, behind an opaque RF-Porous (RFP) panel enclosure (See Exhibit 5), which would be located on the west side of the building. The proposed enclosure is 15 feet in height, and it will fully screen the equipment. The cabinets will be installed within the same enclosure and rooftop cabling secured inside of a cable tray. No generator is proposed as part of this project. See analysis for design provided in FOF 13.c, with associated conditions of approval. Provided conditions of approval are met, the proposed enclosure will be designed to be compatible with the existing structure and surrounding neighborhood.  b. Maximum Height: The maximum building height permitted in the CA zone is 50 feet. The maximum height of wireless communication facilities is governed by RMC 4-4-140F. Per RMC 4-4-140F.2, concealed and/or camouflaged WCFs erected on a rooftop may extend up to sixteen feet (16') above the allowed zone height. Allowed heights for specific types of stealth facilities shall be determined through the Conditional Use Permit review process. Staff Comment: The height of the existing warehouse building is thirty-seven feet and two inches (37’2”). The proposed height of the WCF enclosure is fifteen feet (15’), which would extend fifty-two feet and two inches (52’2”) over the grade plane. The proposal exceeds the maximum height permitted in the CA zone (50’); however, rooftop WCFs may extend up to sixteen feet (16’) above the allowed zone height. The proposal complies with the maximum height permitted for rooftop WCFs in the CA Zone. Compliant if condition of approval is met c. Visual Impact: RMC 4-4-140F.3 requires that site location and development preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and landscape to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less adverse visual impact to the surrounding area. Towers, antennas and related equipment shall be uniformly painted a non-reflective neutral color that best matches the colors within the immediately surrounding built and natural landscape in order to reduce the contrast between the WCF and the landscape. Staff Comment: The proposed WCF and enclosure would be located on the roof of an existing warehouse structure. The proposed enclosure would extend over the existing height of the warehouse by 15 feet, and would be located on the west side of the building. The photo simulations of the proposed enclosure on top of the warehouse (Exhibit 5) indicate that the new WCF enclosure will be visible from the north, east, and south. The proposed equipment and antenna enclosure will be textured and painted gray to match the existing stucco finish of the warehouse building. However, the photo simulations show a significant contrast between the scale and clean surface of the proposed enclosure, and the existing warehouse building. The large scale of the warehouse dwarfs the rooftop enclosure, and the dingy, stained exterior contrasts sharply with the new enclosure exterior. Due to City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 7 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon these factors, the proposal does not meet the intent of the code, which is to integrate with the existing architecture, but rather looks odd and disconnected from the existing warehouse. The WCF enclosure would be better served as a visually prominent architectural feature of the building, rather than a box on top of the warehouse. Staff recommends as a condition of approval the elevation plan be resubmitted to include the following elements with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development of Community & Economic Development, Planning Division project manager. The enclosure shall be incorporated as an architectural feature by either relocating to a corner facing the N 4th St, or over the garage entrance on the north façade. The applicant shall either incorporate a sloped roof and faux windows on the enclosure to act as a turret (such as in RMC 4-3-100E.1, Gateways), or disguise the enclosure as a decorative parapet (with trim). Furthermore, the existing warehouse shall be pressure washed to match the proposed new rooftop enclosure.  d. Setbacks: RMC 4-4-140F.4 requires that towers be set back from each property line by a distance equal to the tower height, unless an engineering analysis concludes that a reduced setback is safe for abutting properties and the Administrator determines that a reduced setback is appropriate for the site. Staff Comment: The proposed WCF and enclosure would be located on the roof of an existing warehouse structure, on the west side of the building. As stated in FOF 13.a, staff recommends a condition of approval that the enclosure be relocated to a street-facing corner of the building or over the garage entrance, with design elements that include faux windows and either a sloped roof, or decorative parapet. This condition will change the proposed setbacks for the WCF and enclosure. The proposal does not include a tower, which is subject to the setback requirements noted above; however, staff will review and approve a new location for the rooftop WCF enclosure at the time of building permit review.  e. Maximum Noise Levels: RMC 4-4-140F.5 limits the noise of equipment associated with Wireless Communication Facilities to forty five (45) decibels as measured from the nearest property line on which the facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back-up generator between eight o’clock (8:00) a.m. and nine o’clock (9:00) p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of nine o’clock (9:00) p.m. and eight o’clock (8:00) a.m. Staff Comment: The applicant has stated in their project narrative that they do not anticipate that the equipment will generate excess noise in the environment. No generator is proposed with the project application. If noise levels exceed the maximum decibel limit, the applicant would be required to bring the proposed facility into compliance with code.  f. Fencing: RMC 4-4-040 limits fences within commercial and industrial zoning to a maximum height of 8 feet. In addition, RMC 4-4-140F.6 requires the installation of security fencing coated with a non-reflective neutral fence. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 8 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon Staff Comment: The applicant is proposing a rooftop WCF with a rooftop enclosure that will be textured and painted to integrate into the existing building design. Staff agree that the enclosure, lack of public access, and rooftop location will be adequate to secure the facility.  g. Lighting: RMC 4-4-140F.7 prohibits the artificial lighting of towers or antennas, unless required by the FAA or other authority. Staff Comment: No exterior lighting is proposed with the project application.  h. Advertising Prohibited: RMC 4-4-140F.8 prohibits the placement of advertising on any part of the Wireless Communication Facility or associated equipment. Staff Comment: The applicant has not proposed any type of advertising to be included on the structure.  i. Building Standards: RMC 4-4-140F.9 requires support structures to be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision G Standard. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer’s certification that the support structure’s design meets or exceeds those standards. Staff Comment: A Structural Analysis and Design Report prepared by Infinigy (Exhibit 4; dated November 3rd, 2017) was submitted with the land use application. The report stated that the rooftop structure would be adequate to support the proposed loading. The report evaluated the rooftop mounted equipment and enclosure, as proposed, and evaluated the building’s adequacy to support the structure and equipment when the applied forces are increased. The applicant will be required to submit the engineer’s certification that the support structure’s design meets the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision G Standard, at the time of building permit application.  j. Radio Frequency Standards: RMC 4-4-140F.10 requires the applicant to ensure that the Wireless Communication Facility will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. Staff Comment: The applicant does not anticipate any interference with the reception of the area television or radio broadcasts and would be required to immediately address any interference issues should they be reported. 14. Design Standards: The site is located within Urban Design District D (RMC 4-3-500). As discussed in FOF 13, the proposed design of the rooftop WCF should meet the overall intent of the minimum standards and contribute to achieving the overarching goals of the design regulations, if conditions of approval are met the WCF and associated enclosure would meet the goals of the design regulations. See FOF 13.c for design analyses. 15. Conditional Use Analysis: In lieu of the criteria normally evaluated for Conditional Use Permits, the following criteria (RMC 4-9-030E) will be considered in determining whether to issue a Conditional Use Permit for a wireless communication facility. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 9 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon Compliance Conditional Use Analysis for Wireless Facilities Compliant if condition of approval is met a. Height and Design of the WCF: See height and design analysis in FOF 13.b and FOF 13.c. Provided the conditions of approval are met regarding enclosure design, the proposed height of the WCF will be compatible with the surrounding uses and meet the guidelines of the Urban Design Regulations. Therefore, Staff approves a height of fifty-two feet and two inches (52’2”) over existing grade plane for the proposed WCF. Compliant if condition of approval is met b. Proximity of WCF to Residential Structures And Residential District Boundaries: The proposed rooftop WCF would be installed on a site zoned CA. Surrounding properties to the south, east, and west are also within the CA Zone. Property to the north is within the Heavy Industrial (IH) Zone. The closest residential use to the proposed rooftop WCF location is a nonconforming single family residential use located approximately 65 feet to the south, across the abutting alley. Another nonconforming residential use is located approximately 80 feet to the southwest. The nearest single family residential homes located within the R-8 zone are located approximately 319 feet to the southwest of the proposed rooftop WCF location, on the southwest corner of N Marion St and Factory PL N. Provided the applicant complies with conditions of approval and redesigns the proposed rooftop enclosure as discussed in FOF 13.c, the proposed rooftop enclosure will be adequately designed to minimize the visual impact of the WCF, and will be compatible with surrounding uses. Compliant if condition of approval is met c. Nature of Uses On Adjacent and Nearby Properties: As discussed in FOF 15.b, surrounding properties to the south, east, and west are within the CA Zone and property to the north is within the Heavy Industrial (IH) Zone. Surrounding uses include PACCAR to the north, a warehouse to the east, an office building to the west, and an office building, two nonconforming single family residences, and a pump station to the south. The closest residential use to the proposed rooftop WCF location is a nonconforming single family residential use located approximately 65 feet to the south, across the abutting alley. A rooftop enclosure designed to replicate the look of an architectural feature, as discussed in FOF 13.c, will be appropriate for this area. If the design conditions are met, Staff does not anticipate that the proposed rooftop WCF would have any significant adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and uses.  d. Topography and Vegetation: The proposed WCF and enclosure will be located on the rooftop of an existing warehouse. No excavation, ground disturbance, or vegetation removal is proposed with this application.  e. Ingress/Egress: Vehicular access to the project site will be provided via an existing driveway off of N 4th St. No changes are proposed to the existing vehicular access to the project site.  f. Noise, Light, and Glare: As stated in FOF 14.e and FOF 13.g, no generator or exterior lighting is proposed with the project application. As such, impacts of light and glare are not anticipated to be above what is permitted in the CA Zone. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 10 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon Compliant if condition of approval is met g. Colocation Feasibility: The applicant submitted satisfactory evidence that no existing tower or support structure can accommodate the proposed equipment relocation. The applicant explained that the primary candidate for the new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) was the PACCAR property to the north, which has several large commercial buildings that would be adequate for the proposed WCF; however, the applicant stated that PACCAR was not interested in leasing space for the WCF installation. In addition, the applicant explained that there are no existing monopoles where collocation would be available that could offer equivalent coverage. The applicant submitted a site selection analysis with a map showing the limited service area and proposed location (Exhibit 6) with the project application. Due to steady growth and development near the project site and the ever- increasing demand for cellular data, the need for new or upgraded cellular equipment is likely to grow. In order to provide an opportunity for the future colocation, new wireless enclosures should be designed to allow for the colocation of new equipment in the future. Therefore, Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the proposed rooftop WCF enclosure incorporate space to allow for future colocation efforts or provide sufficient documentation that this cannot be accomplished at this location.  j. Consistency With Plans and Regulations: As previously discussed above under FOF 12 and 13 the proposed installation of the new camouflage WCF is consistent with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and RMC 4-4-140 Wireless Communication Facilities regulations provided the conditions of approval are complied with.  k. Landscaping: The applicant is proposing a rooftop WCF. No modification to existing onsite landscaping is proposed with the project application. As discussed in FOF 15.d, no excavation, ground disturbance, or vegetation removal is proposed with this application. I. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject site is located in the Commercial & Mixed Use (CMU) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation if conditions of approval are met, see FOF 12. 2. The subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 13. 3. The proposed rooftop WCF meets the ten (10) development standards that apply specifically to new Wireless Communication Facilities, provided the applicant meets all conditions of approval, see FOF 13. 4. The proposed rooftop WCF meets the nine (9) special decision criteria considered when making a decision on a conditional use permit request for a Wireless Communications Facility, as specified in RMC 4-9-030E, provided the applicant meets all conditions of approval, see FOF 15. CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentSEAHOUSERWAYVERIZONMarch25,2018AdministrativeReport&DecisionLUA17-000871,CU-APage11of12J.DECISION:TheSEAHouserWayVerizonConditionalUsePermit,FileNo.LUA17-000871,isapprovedandissubjecttothefollowingconditions:1.TheapplicantshallsubmitarevisedelevationplanwiththebuildingpermitapplicationforreviewandapprovalbytheDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopment,PlanningDivisionprojectmanager,toincludethefollowingelements:a.TheequipmentenclosureshallbeincorporatedasanarchitecturalfeaturebyeitherrelocatingtoacornerfacingN4thSt,orrelocatingoverthegarageentranceonthenorthfaçade.b.Theapplicantshalleitherincorporateaslopedroofandfauxwindowsontheenclosuretoactasaturret(suchasinRMC4-3-100E.1,Gateways),ordisguisetheenclosureasadecorativeparapet(withtrim).c.Theexistingwarehouseshallbepressurewashedtomatchtheproposednewrooftopenclosure.Photodocumentationshallbeprovidedpriortobuildingpermitissuance.2.ThedesignoftherooftopWCFenclosureshallallowforadditionalequipmentcolocationinthefutureunlessdeterminedinfeasiblebytheCurrentPlanningProjectManageratthetimeofbuildingpermitapplication.Colocationfeasibilityanalysisshallbeprovidedwiththebuildingpermitapplicationidentifyingeitherthelocationforadditionalequipmentoradeterminationofcolocationinfeasibility.DATEOFDECISIONONLANDUSEACTION:SIGNATURE:JenniferHenning,PlanningDirectTRANSMITTEDthis25thdayofApril,2018totheOwner/Applicant/Contact:April25,2018DateOwner:SeattleOpera1655N4thSTRenton,WA98057Applicant:MikeCunninghamVerizonWireless,3245158thAveSE,Bellevue,WA98008Contact:BeckyTodd97253rdAveNE,Suite410Seattle,WA98115TRANSMITTEDthis25thdayofApril,2018tothefollowing:ChipVincent,CEDAdministratorBrianneBannwarth,DevelopmentEngineeringManagerVanessaDolbee,CurrentPlanningManagerAmandaAskren,PropertyandTechnicalServicesManagerJenniferHenning,PlanningDirectorFireMarshalD_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_WayVerizon City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision SEA HOUSER WAY VERIZON LUA17-000871, CU-A March 25, 2018 Page 12 of 12 D_Administrative_Report_SEA_Houser_Way_Verizon K. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION: The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on May 9th, 2018. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680), together with the required fee to the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Conditional Use Permit decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-030. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 SEA HOUSER WAY – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Project: SEA Houser Way- Verizon Project Location: 1655 N 4th ST Parcel: 1352301205 Zoning: CA-Commercial Arterial Proposal: Verizon is proposing to construct an unmanned telecommunications facility on the rooftop of an existing commercial warehouse building. The antennas will be installed on the rooftop, behind an opaque RF- Porous (RFP) panel enclosure, which will resemble a rooftop mechanical enclosure. There will be one enclosure in total, 15 feet in height, and it will fully screen the equipment. The cabinets will be installed within the same enclosure and rooftop cabling secured inside of a cable tray. The initial antenna configuration will include four sectors with two antennas in each. Each sector will have three remote radio units (RRU’s) and surge protection equipment. Two equipment cabinets will be installed, with space for a third in the event of future upgrades. The project will not create ground disturbance or increased impervious surface, and no alterations to the existing landscaping will be made. Current Use and Adjacent Properties: The subject property is presently used as a warehouse for the Seattle Opera. Directly to the north is the PACCAR warehouse; to the east, another warehouse. To the west, there is an office building, and to the south, the properties contain several small businesses, a pump station, and a small house. Critical Areas: The Renton COR maps indicate the property is within a wellhead projection area. All site construction will be limited to the footprint of the existing building and to existing impervious surface areas should utility upgrades be required. Access: The facility will be accessed via an existing driveway that opens onto N. 4th Ave, and via a roof hatch on the west side of the north corner of the existing building. Both are depicted on A-1 of the plans set. Topography and Terrain: The immediate vicinity where the site is proposed is west of I-405 and is relatively flat; to the east of I- 405, the elevation increases. The subject property is screened to the north by mature street trees that screen the subject building. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 Distance to Residential: The approximate distance from the Rooftop WCF installation to a structure that may contain a residential use is 85 feet; the approximate distance from the Rooftop WCF installation to a Residential zone is 309 feet. Estimate is taken from the approximate location of the Rooftop WCF on the property. To house that may contain residential use: 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 Distance to Residential Zone: 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF RMC 4-4-140 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES: A. – C. The purposes, goals, applicability of provisions, and the authority of the City to review and approve/deny permits under this code are acknowledged by the applicant; the proposed facility has been designed with the intent to comply with the stated design standards and policy goals of this chapter. D. COLLOCATION REQUIRED: Response: Does not apply; no new structure is proposed, there are no existing towers to which to attach in the area, and the proposal is to install a new wireless facility on a rooftop (e xisting structure). E. ALTERATION OF EXISTING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY (WCF) SUPPORT STRUCTURES: Does not apply; there is no existing WCF support structure on-site or in the vicinity that is being modified. F. STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL TYPES OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES: 1. Equipment Shelters/Cabinets: a. Location: Equipment shelters and cabinets used to house related equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground, unless it is infeasible. However, in those c ases where it can be demonstrated by the applicant that the equipment cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be screened to the Administrator’s satisfaction. b. Screening: Equipment shelters and cabinets shall be surrounded by a fifteen-foot (15') wide sight-obscuring landscape buffer along the outside perimeter of required security fencing with a minimum height that is no less than the height of the compound fence at any point; however, existing topography, vegetation and other site characteristics may provide relief from the screening 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 requirement. The required landscaped areas shall include an automated irrigation system, unless the applicant is able to justify an exception to this requirement to the Administrat or’s satisfaction. Related equipment facilities located on the roof of any building need not be landscaped but shall be screened on all sides in a manner that complements and blends with the surroundings so as to be shielded from view. Related equipment facilities shall not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. (Ord. 5798, 4-25-2016) c. Size: The applicant shall provide documentation that the size of any equipment shelters or cabinets is the minimum necessary to meet the provider’s service needs. The are a of the compound may be greater than is necessary in order to accommodate future collocations, but the area reserved for future equipment shelters/cabinets shall be the minimum necessary for the documented WCF capacity. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) Response: The ground equipment will be installed within the rooftop antenna enclosure that will be integrated into the warehouse rooftop. While this is not “in” the existing building as preferred under (a), this additional enclosure will be integrated into the buildin g appearance and avoid construction of a separate ground-level enclosure. As the cabinets will be within the new structure, no further screening is necessary under (b) and no shelter is proposed as under (c). d. Generators: i. Architectural integration is required (if applicable). ii. To the extent feasible, generators shall be enclosed along with the related equipment. Similar to equipment shelters, the screening for the generator shall utilize similar building materials, colors, accents, and textures as the primary building; if no buildings exist on site, ensure that the building is designed to blend in with the environment. iii. A screening wall and/or landscaping material shall be required to mitigate visual impacts. iv. Fences shall be constructed of materials that complement and blend in with the surroundings. v. Anti-graffiti finish shall be applied to all solid fences, walls, and gates. vi. A noise analysis shall be required to demonstrate that the generator will operate within allowed noise limits if the generator is the sole power source. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 Response: no permanent generator is proposed such that permanent screening is required. 2. Maximum Height: All wireless communication facilities shall comply with RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions. In addition, all wireless communication facilities shall comply with the height limitation of the applicable zoning district, except as follows: a. Monopole I: N/A b. Monopole II: N/A c. Stealth Towers: N/A d. Rooftop WCF: Concealed and/or camouflaged WCFs erected on a rooftop may extend up to sixteen feet (16') above the allowed zone height. e. Utility Poles: N/A Response: The proposed antenna enclosures will extend to 52’-2” AGL, which is 15’-0” taller than the top of the existing roof. The CA zone height is 50 feet. 3. Visual Impact: Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and landscape to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less adverse visual impact to the surrounding area. Towers, antennas and related equipment shall be uniformly painted a non-reflective neutral color that best matches the colors within the immediately surrounding built and natural landscape in order to reduce the contrast be tween the WCF and the landscape. Response: The only visual impact created by installation of this facility will be the appearance of a new rooftop enclosure that will look like HVAC or other rooftop mechanical equipment. The antennas and cabinets will be fully contained within the enclosures, which will be painted to match the exterior of the building. No existing vegetation will be removed to accommodate the facility. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 4. Setbacks: Towers shall be set back from each property line by a distance equal to the tower height, unless an engineering analysis concludes that a reduced setback is safe for abutting properties and the Administrator determines that a reduced setback is appropriate for the site. Response: Does not apply; no new tower. 5. Maximum Noise Levels: No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above forty five (45) decibels as measured from the nearest property line on which the wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back- up generator between eight o’clock (8:00) a.m. and nine o’clock (9:00) p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of nine o’clock (9:00) p.m. and eight o’clock (8:00) a.m. Response: The equipment cabinets will be located within a solid enclosure on the roof and will not generate excess noise in the environment. No permanent generator will be installed. 6. Fencing: Security fencing shall be required and shall be painted or coated with a non-reflective neutral color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in RMC 4-4-040, Fences, Hedges, and Retaining Walls. Response: The facility will be installed within a rooftop enclosure; the screening, lack of public access, and rooftop location will be adequate to secure the facility and to screen it. 7. Lighting: Towers or antennas shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the Administrator may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Security lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other on-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the compound. (Or d. 5675, 12-3-2012) Response: No exterior lighting is proposed. 8. Advertising Prohibited: No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any abutting roadway shall be placed on or affixed to any part of a WCF tower, antenna array or antenna, other than as required by FCC regulations regarding tower registration or other applicable law. Antenna arrays designed and approved to be located on or within signs or 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 billboards as a stealth tower, or a concealed or camouflaged WCF, shall not be construed to be in violation of this prohibition. (Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) Response: no commercial signage is proposed. The only signage at the site will be for site identification and emergency contact information, and will be posted at the access points to the facility and not visible to the road. 9. Building Standards: Support structures shall be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision G Standard entitled: “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures” (or equivalent), as it may be updated or amended. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer’s certification that the support structure’s design meets or exceeds those standards. (Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) Response: A structural analysis will be provided at the time of building permit application. 10. Radio Frequency Standards: The applicant shall ensure that the wireless communication facility (WCF) will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If the City finds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interfe rence is not remedied within thirty (30) calendar days, the City may revoke or modify a Building and/or Conditional Use Permit. (Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) Response: Verizon will be operating within their FCC licensed frequencies, which are separate from local television and radio licensed frequencies. No interference is anticipated. G. CONCEALED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY STANDARDS: Additions or modifications to buildings shall complement the existing design, bulk, scale, a nd symmetry of the building, and minimize the addition of bulk and clutter. Concealed WCFs shall adhere to the following standards: 1. Building Addition: All antennas shall be fully concealed within a structure that is architecturally compatible with the existing building. Roof top additions shall be concealed on all sides. Response: the antennas will be located within a screened enclosure designed and painted to match the building. The screens will wrap around the antennas and be located on the rooftop in such a way that none of the antenna installation will be visible from the ground. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 2. Related Equipment: The related equipment shall be completely concealed inside a structure or inside an underground vault. Concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls and prefabricated facilities do not meet the intent of a concealed WCF. Equipment enclosures shall be designed to be compatible with the existing building/structure. Response: Ground equipment will be located inside the proposed rooftop screen, with the antennas. 3. Materials: Fiberglass reinforced plastic or radio frequency transparent materials may be used to screen and integrate a WCF with an existing building. Visible transition lines between the old and new surfaces are prohibited. Response: The screening will be located on the rooftop, and will look contiguous with the building in that it will appear as rooftop mechanical equipment. 4. Architectural Elements: New architectural features such as columns, pilasters, corbels, or other ornamentation that conceal antennas may be used if it complements the architecture of the existing building. Response: No ornamentation is proposed; the existing building façade does not contain these elements. 5. Residential Buildings: Wireless communication facilities shall not be located on residential buildings except for multi-family structures constructed pursuant to the International Building Code as an occupancy group R-2, which may serve as a support structure if the interior wall or ceiling immediately abutting the facility is an unoccupied residential space (e.g., stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms, etc.). Response: The use of the building is warehouse space. H. CAMOUFLAGED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY STANDARDS: Additions or modifications to buildings shall complement the existing design, bulk, scale, and symmetry of the building, and minimize the addition of bulk and clutter. Camouflaged WCFs shall adhere to the following standards: 1. Architectural Integration: Antennas may be mounted to the sides of a building if the antennas do not interrupt the building’s architectural theme. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 a. When feasible, camouflaged WCFs shall employ a symmetrical, balanced design for all facade mounted antennas. The first provider on a structure will dictate the antenna length, width, and placement. All succeeding applications will be required to ensure consistency and symmetry in placing antennas on the structure’s exterior. b. When feasible, interruption of architectural lines or horizontal or vertical reveals is prohibited. Response: The antennas will not be mounted to the façade, but rather contained within a rooftop enclosure. The enclosure will be architecturally compatible with the building and in scale with the structure. The structure is a warehouse building, and the antenna enclosures will extend about 15 feet above the existing parapet. 2. Materials: a. Mounting Hardware: Utilize the smallest mounting brackets necessary in order to provide the smallest offset from the building. b. Concealment: Utilize skirts or shrouds on the sides and bottoms of antennas in order to conceal mounting hardware, create a cleaner appearance, and minimize the visual impact of the antennas. Exposed cabling is prohibited. c. Paint: Paint and texture antennas to match the adjacent building surfaces. Response: The mounting hardware will be concealed within the rooftop antenna enclosure, the base of which will not be visible from the ground level due to being screened behind the existing parapet. The enclosure will be painted to match the building. 3. Antennas: a. Antennas shall be no longer or wider than the facade on which they are proposed. b. When panel antennas are unscreened, they shall be mounted no more than twelve inches (12") from the building facade. c. No exposed mounting apparatus shall remain on a building facade without the associated antennas. Response: the antennas are not façade-mounted; does not apply. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 4. Residential Buildings: Wireless communication facilities shall not be located on residential buildings except for multi-family structures constructed pursuant to the International Building Code as an occupancy group R-2, which may serve as a support structure if the interior wall or ceiling immediately abutting the facility is an unoccupied residential space (e.g., stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms, etc.). Response: Does not apply; the building is a commercial office building. I. STEALTH TOWER STANDARDS: Does not apply; no tower is proposed. J. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: In addition to application materials and information required pursuant to RMC 4-8-120C, Table 4-8-120C – Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements, the following materials are the minimum required to complete a review of any WCF, other than an alteration pursuant to subsection E1 of this Section, Minor Alteration. Additional materials and information may be required. 1. Technical Analysis: a. Site Justification Letter: This report shall justify the need or requirement for the proposed WCF location and design. An analysis of other available sites shall be included as well as determination as to why these sites were not selected. Response: Analysis of the area and search area map are included. b. Justification Map: A map identifying the zoning districts, search area, alternative sites, the selected site, and all existing and approved WCFs within a one-half (1/2) mile radius. Response: the RF documentation includes a map of existing Verizon sites. Below is an inventory of existing WCF towers, view adjusted for ½ mile of the proposed site. 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 c. Coverage Map: Map(s) identifying the proposed target coverage that illustrate the coverage prior to and after the installation. Response: This information is included in the RF documentation. d. Noise Report: For projects proposed adjacent to residential uses when generators, air conditioning units, or other noise-generating devices are utilized. Response: No generator is proposed as part of this project. 2. Photo Simulations: Photo simulations shall be required with each plan set. The photo simulations shall illustrate the proposed WCF from at least four (4) vantage points and show the existing view (without the proposed WCF) and proposed view (with the proposed WCF) from each vantage point. Response: Included in application. 3. Method of Attachment/Cabling: Dimensioned details shall be provided of antennas and mounting hardware used to attach the antennas to the structure. Response: all mounting hardware and attachments will be internal to the antenna enclosure and will not be visible. Details will be included on construction drawings. 4. Visual Mitigation: Any concealment/integration techniques proposed shall be fully explained, illustrated and detailed. Response: See photosims. K. OBSOLESCENCE AND REMOVAL: Any wireless communications facility that is no longer needed or is not operational shall be reported immediately by the service provider to the Administrator. Discontinued facilities or facilities that are in disrepair, as determined by the Administrator, shall be decommissioned and removed by the facility owner within six (6) months of the date it ceases to be operational, and the site shall be restored to its pre-existing condition. The Administrator may approve an extension of an additional six (6) months if good cause is demonstrated by the facility owner. (Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) L. PERMIT LIMITATIONS: 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 1. Maintenance Required: The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City at the time of the granting of a permit. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. 2. Notice to City of Change of Operation of Facility: The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in operation of the facility within sixty (60) calendar days of the change. (Ord. 4666, 6 -2-1997, Amd. Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997; Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012) M. MODIFICATIONS: The Administrator shall have the authority to modify the standards of this Section, subject to the provisions of RMC 4-9-250D, Modification Procedures. N. APPEALS: See RMC 4-8-110, Appeals. (Ord. 4722, 5-11-1998; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5746, 1-12-2015) Response: the above sections K-N are acknowledged by the Applicant as standard conditions. N OVERALL SITE PLAN1 0"20'10'20' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. TJB PD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 90% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS010/12/17 F R O M Z E R O IOT N F I IN G Y A-1 100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS111/06/17 SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS201/30/18 OVERALL SITE PLAN - S-2 INGRESSEGRESSSUBJECT PARCEL APN: 1352301205 ZONING: CA HOUSER WAYPROPERTY LINE  6ƒ ( N 4TH STREET EXISTING PARKING LOT ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301185 ZONING: CA PROPERTY LINE 6ƒ :ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301285 ZONING: CA EXISTING BUILDING NOTES: 1.SITE PLAN SHALL MEET ALL ENGINEERING AND NPDES REQUIREMENTS. ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301295 ZONING: CA ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301300 ZONING: CA ALLEY ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301225 ZONING: CA PROPERTY LINE  1ƒ :PROPERTY LINE 1ƒ (EXISTING SKYLIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TURBINE VENT, TYP. EXISTING VENT PIPE, TYP. EXISTING VENT HOOD, TYP. EXISTING ROOF ACCESS HATCH EXISTING HVAC EXISTING METER PROPOSED VERIZON 200A METER ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 1352301275 ZONING: CA ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 722300000010 ZONING: IH 1 A-2 NOTE: PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND ANTENNA ENCLOSURE TO BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING. THE NEW FRP MATERIAL WILL BE TEXTURED TO MATCH THE EXISTING STUCCO FINISH AND BE PAINTED A GRAY COLOR TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING. 44'-7"28'-9"79'-3"199'-6" 1 20'-0" ACCESS EASEMENT 1 SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. TJB PD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 90% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS010/12/17 F R O M Z E R O IOT N F I IN G Y A-2 100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS111/06/17 SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS201/30/18 ENLARGED PLANS 0" 22"x34" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"8'6'4'8'2' N ENLARGED EQUIPMENT & ANTENNA PLAN2 PROPOSED VERIZON POWER PANEL PROPOSED VERIZON TELCO BOX 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN2'1'2'0" 22"x34" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED VERIZON CONDUIT 2 - 16'-0" PROPOSED LEASE AREA 19'-0"PROPOSED LEASE AREAPROPOSED VERIZON 5'-0" WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT N PROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 6 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINETS 1 A-7 2 A-7 PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA 8 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON SAFETY BOX PROPOSED VERIZON WORK LIGHT, TYP.“ “ “  “ “  PROPERTY LINE  6ƒ ( EXISTING BUILDING PROPERTY LINE  1ƒ :PROPERTY LINE 1ƒ (EXISTING SKYLIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TURBINE VENT, TYP. EXISTING VENT HOOD, TYP. EXISTING SKYLIGHT EXISTING TURBINE VENT, TYP. PROPOSED VERIZON GEN PLUG EXISTING PARKING LOT PROPOSED VERIZON 5'-0" WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED VERIZON CONDUIT PROPOSED VERIZON CONDUIT FUTURE VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINET - S-3 PROPOSED SUPPORT BEAMS - S-4 NOTE: PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND ANTENNA ENCLOSURE TO BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING. THE NEW FRP MATERIAL WILL BE TEXTURED TO MATCH THE EXISTING STUCCO FINISH AND BE PAINTED A GRAY COLOR TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING. 1 SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. TJB PD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 90% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS010/12/17 F R O M Z E R O IOT N F I IN G Y A-3 100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS111/06/17 SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS201/30/18 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS 0"8'8' 22"x34" SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"4'1 NORTH ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION 0"8'8' 22"x34" SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"4' NOTE: PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND ANTENNA ENCLOSURE TO BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING. THE NEW FRP MATERIAL WILL BE TEXTURED TO MATCH THE EXISTING STUCCO FINISH AND BE PAINTED A GRAY COLOR TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING. GRADE ELEV. 0'-0" AGL (38.6' AMSL) (/(9“ $*/ RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS & FRP ENCLOSURES (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF EXISTING ROOF SLOPE (/(9“ $*/ EXISTING ROOF PROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 6 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINETS 1 A-7 2 A-7 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA8 RF-1 GRADE ELEV. 0'-0" AGL (38.6' AMSL) (/(9“ $*/ RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS & FRP ENCLOSURES (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF EXISTING ROOF SLOPE (/(9“ $*/ EXISTING ROOF PROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 6 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINETS1 A-7 2 A-7 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA8 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON GEN PLUG PROPOSED VERIZON METER EXISTING METER EXISTING METER - S-3 - S-3 1 SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. TJB PD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 90% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS010/12/17 F R O M Z E R O IOT N F I IN G Y A-4 100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS111/06/17 SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS201/30/18 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS 0"8'8' 22"x34" SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"4'1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION 0"8'8' 22"x34" SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"4' GRADE ELEV. 0'-0" AGL (38.6' AMSL) (/(9“ $*/ RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS & FRP ENCLOSURES (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF EXISTING ROOF SLOPE (/(9“ $*/ EXISTING ROOF PROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 6 RF-1 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA8 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINETS 1 A-7 2 A-7 PROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 6 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT CABINETS1 A-7 2 A-7 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA8 RF-1 GRADE ELEV. 0'-0" AGL (38.6' AMSL) (/(9“ $*/ RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS & FRP ENCLOSURES (/(9“ $*/ TOP OF EXISTING ROOF SLOPE (/(9“ $*/ EXISTING ROOF PROPOSED VERIZON GEN PLUG PROPOSED VERIZON METER PROPOSED VERIZON GEN PLUG - S-3 - S-3 NOTE: PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND ANTENNA ENCLOSURE TO BE TEXTURED AND PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING. THE NEW FRP MATERIAL WILL BE TEXTURED TO MATCH THE EXISTING STUCCO FINISH AND BE PAINTED A GRAY COLOR TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING. 1 PROPOSED 2-3/8" DIA. GALV. STEEL MOUNTING PIPE PROPOSED 2-3/8" DIA. GALV. STEEL MOUNTING PIPE MOUNTING BRACKET PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER MOUNTING BRACKET PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROPOSED DC SURGE SUPPRESSION UNIT PROPOSED DC SURGE SUPPRESSION UNIT MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP MODEL: RVZDC-6627-PF-48 DIMENSIONS: 29.5"x16.5"x12.6" MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP MODEL: RxxDC-3315-PF-48 BOTTOM FRONT RF CONNECTOR, TYP MECHANICAL DOWNTILT BRACKET RF CONNECTOR, TYP MANUFACTURER: COMMSCOPE MODEL: JAHH-45C-R3B WEIGHT: 106.3 LBS; BRACKET: 17.4 LBS DIMENSIONS: 95.9" X 18.0" X 7.0" FREQUENCY: REFER TO RF DATA SHEET MANUFACTURER: ERICSSON MODEL: RRUS 32 HEIGHT: 26.7 in WIDTH: 12.1 in DEPTH: 6.7 in WEIGHT: 60.0 lbs TOP FRONT SIDE MANUFACTURER: ERICSSON MODEL: RADIO 4449 (BANDS 13, 5) WEIGHT: 85 LBS DIMENSIONS: 28"Hx15"Wx10"D (MAX.) SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. TJB PD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 90% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS010/12/17 F R O M Z E R O IOT N F I IN G Y RF-1 100% CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS111/06/17 SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS201/30/18 ANTENNA PLAN & RF DETAILS 4 OVP SPECIFICATION NOT TO SCALE 3NOT USED GPS ANTENNA SPECIFICATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE6RRU SPECIFICATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 5 ANTENNA SPECIFICATION NOT TO SCALE8NOT TO SCALE 7 PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN21RF INFORMATION 2'1'2'0" 22"x34" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RRU SPECIFICATION GPS ANTENNA 1 1/2" O.D. X 3'-0" MAX. GALV. STEEL MOUNTING PIPE #6 AWG GROUND WIRE TO CADWELD ON POST OR LUG ON GROUND BAR COAX GROUND KIT ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE (OR SIMILAR) PIPE-TO-PIPE CLAMP COAX CABLE ELEVATION 16'-0" PROPOSED LEASE AREA 19'-0"PROPOSED LEASE AREAPROPOSED VERIZON RRU'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (3 PER SECTOR, 12 TOTAL) 5 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON OVP (2 TOTAL)7 RF-1 6 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR, 8 TOTAL)3 RF-1 PROPOSED VERIZON 16'-0"x19'-0"x15'-0" FRP ENCLOSURE PROPOSED VERIZON GPS ANTENNA 8 RF-1 “ “  EXISTING SKYLIGHT EXISTING TURBINE VENT, TYP. - S-3 DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED INFINIGY FROM ZERO IOTNFIINGY the solutions are endless SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: S3 0 3D VIEW SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY 0 11/01/17 FOR REVIEW AEF MVK FRP PANELING COVERS ONLY FOUR PERIMETER WALLS OF THE ENCLOSURE 3D VIEW SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 - - 5x33 EXISTING GLULAM ROOF BEAM (V.I.F.) (TYP.) 11"x11"x1/2" BASE PLATE W/ (4) 3/4" DIA. ALL THREAD RODS (TYP. 6) HSS 6x6x1/2 POST (TYP. 6) HSS 6x6x3/16 FRP BEAM (TYP.) W8X31 BEAM (TYP. 3) W8X31 MAIN BEAM (TYP. 2) HSS 6X6X3/8 FRP COLUMN (TYP.) L4x4x1/4 ANGLE (TYP. 8) HSS 6x6x3/16 FRP DIAGONAL (TYP.) 3/4" DIA. ALL THREAD ROD (TYP.) 2" STD. PIPE (TYP.) HSS 7x7x1/2 BASE (TYP. 9) 11"x11"x1/2" PLATE (TYP.) ALL MEMBERS ARE STEEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GRATING COVERS ENTIRE 16'x19' ENCLOSURE FLOOR NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY 11/02/2017 DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: DATE REVISION DESCRIPTIONREV. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED INFINIGY FROM ZERO IOTNFIINGY the solutions are endless SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER:REV.: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF INFINIGY, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF INFINIGY, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. PROJECT INFORMATION: S5 0 OVERALL VIEWS SEA HOUSER WAY 1655 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 KING COUNTY 0 11/01/17 FOR REVIEW AEF MVKEAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" 4 - - WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" 5 - - NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" 6 - - 5x33 EXISTING ROOF BEAM (V.I.F.) (TYP.) 11"x11"x1/2" BASE PLATE W/ (4) 3/4" DIA. ALL THREAD RODS (TYP.) HSS 6x6x1/2 POST (TYP.) W8X31 BEAM (TYP.) W8X31 MAIN BEAM (TYP.) HSS 6X6X3/8 FRP COLUMN (TYP.) 41'-3" TOP OF BEAM 49'-7" PROPOSED ANTENNAS ℄ HSS 6x6x3/16 FRP DIAGONAL (TYP.) 2" STD. PIPE W/ (2) 1/2" DIA. U-BOLTS (TYP.)4'-1"EQUAL EQUAL EQUAL 16'-0" EQUAL EXISTING ROOF COVER (TYP.) 9'-6" (V.I.F.) FRP PANELING 38'-11" (V.I.F.) TOP OF EXISTING ROOF COVER 19'-0" EQUAL 4'-0"7'-0" 5'-4"8'-3"3'-1"12'-4"18'-9" (V.I.F.) 18'-9" (V.I.F.) EQUAL 19'-0" 37'-6" (V.I.F.) 9'-6" (V.I.F.)15'-5"11/02/2017 RECEIVED 12/29/2017 amorganroth PLANNING DIVISION 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 SITE SELECTION INFORMATION Project: SEA Houser Way- Verizon Project Location: 1655 N 4th ST Parcel: 1352301205 Zoning: CA-Commercial Arterial Search Area: The pink polygon identifies the area where Verizon would like to locate a new facility to improve coverage in the Renton area. The proposed site is to the south of the polygon, marked with a yellow pin, on a warehouse rooftop on Houser Way, adjacent to I-405. RECEIVED 12/29/2017 amorganroth PLANNING DIVISION 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 410, Seattle, WA 98115 Alternative Siting Options Considered: • Several commercial buildings within the pink polygon and the large industrial property to the north of the proposed site location All the parcels within the search area and the industrial properties north of the site location are all owned by PACCAR. They were approached over the possibility of installing wireless communications facilities, but they were not interested in leasing space on any of their properties for WCF installations. There were no existing monopoles where collocation would be available that could offer equivalent coverage.