Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport and Exhibits_Modification_FINAL_v3.pdf.pdfDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Location Map Report_Modification_FINAL_v3 A. ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REPORT & DECISION DECISION: APPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS DENIED REPORT DATE: August 15, 2018 Project Name: Monaco LLC Urban Modification Request Owner: Monaco LLC; 423 South 3rd Street, Renton, WA 98057 Contact: John Fuchs; 1724 Cole Street, Ste. 10, Enumclaw, WA 98022 Project File Number: PR18-000001 Land Use File Number: LUA18-000448 Project Manager: Jeffrey Taylor, Assistant Planner Zoning Classification: Center Downtown (CD) Summary of Request: Pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D the applicant is requesting one Administrative Modification from RMC 4-3-100 Urban Design Regulations, which encourages that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment. The applicant is requesting a modification to allow the construction of a storage building and associated parking spaces to support the existing office. Project Location: 423 South 3rd Street Site Area: 5280 square feet (0.12 acres) DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Modification Report & Decision MONACO LLC URBAN MODIFICATION REQUEST LUA18-000448, MOD August 15, 2018 Page 2 of 6 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Modification Request Justification Exhibit 2: Site Plan/Landscape Plan C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a modification from the Renton Municipal Code, Site Design and Building Location standards (RMC 4-3-100E.1), which requires that buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk; the front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian-only courtyard, and the primary entrance of each building shall be located on the façade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human-scale elements. Further, multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. The applicant also requests a modification from Building Architectural Design standards (RMC 4-3-100E.5), which requires that all building façades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'), and any façade visible to the public shall be comprised of at least fifty percent (50%) transparent windows and/or doors for at least the portion of the ground floor façade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). The project is located at 423 S. 3rd Street (parcel number 7840800005) and is located within the CD Zone. The applicant is requesting these modifications to allow the construction of a storage building to support the existing office with an entryway facing the existing office, and surface parking along the rear of the lot. D. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: Design District Modification Analysis: The applicant is requesting a modification from RMC 4-3-100 Urban Design Regulations in order to construct a new storage building and associated parking lot. The proposal is compliant with the following modification criteria, pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D and 4-3-100F. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the requested modification. Compliance Modification Criteria and Analysis Compliant if conditions of approval are met a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. Staff Comment: Provided the conditions of approval are met, the modification proposal will be consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and Community Design Element goals, including: Complementing the built environment with landscaping using native, naturalized, and ornamental plantings that are appropriate for the situation and circumstance and provide for respite, recreation, and sun/shade (Policy L-56); Improving the appearance of parking lots through landscaping and screening (Policy L-60); and including human-scale features such as pedestrian pathways, quality landscaping, and public spaces that have discernible edges, entries, and borders to create a distinctive sense of place in neighborhoods, commercial areas, and centers (Policy L-51). The applicant proposes to construct a 10-foot wide, approximately 47-foot long, planter strip constituting 25% of his property width along the public street frontage, to screen the proposed storage structure and parking spaces from public view. The applicant proposes to plant wax myrtle shrubs to serve as a visual barrier, and strawberry bushes DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Modification Report & Decision MONACO LLC URBAN MODIFICATION REQUEST LUA18-000448, MOD August 15, 2018 Page 3 of 6 as ground cover. Staff noted this proposal does not meet the intent of RMC 4-4-070H.1 which requires a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover for the first 10ft. of the street side of the site measured from the property line. Staff recommends that the applicant plant two (2) Japanese flowering cherry trees within the on-site planter strip, at minimum of two-inch (2”) caliper each; additionally, staff recommends that a mixture of shrubs be used. Staff concurs that Wax Myrtles can be utilized, provided they are paired with Oregon Grapes, and further concurs that strawberries may be used as ground cover. As a condition of approval the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan at the time of building permit application reflecting staff recommendations (or another proposal as approved by staff) and complying with RMC 4-4-070. If the conditions of approval are met, staff concurs that the proposed landscape buffer will substantially implement Policy L-56 of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element by offering both respite and shade to the public. The proposed landscaping strip will also serve to implement Policies L-51, and L-60 by screening the parking spaces from the public realm along Morris Ave. S. Further, it will create a more discernable border for the lot and add quality landscaping that enhances the public space. The applicant’s proposed placement of the parking spaces is between his rear lot line (alley) and the proposed structure. This site configuration reduces the prominence of the parking spaces in the pedestrian realm and minimizes visual impact of the new improvements. Staff concurs that this site design would meet the intent of Policy L-60 by improving the appearance of the parking spaces, through the use of both the storage structure, and the planter strip as screening for parked vehicles. Staff concurs that this placement also conforms to Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy L-51 by including human scale elements, including the preservation of open space in the center of the lot. The open space would serve as an open courtyard with a pedestrian pathway connecting the storage structure to the primary structure, creating walkability and interconnection between the two buildings on the site. The applicant also proposes to install decorative solar lights on all façades to accentuate the entryway to the storage structure, and to illuminate the courtyard used by pedestrians to access the office building. Further, the applicant proposes a decorative planter attached to the eastern street facing façade to add articulation, and draw attention to the landscaping and courtyard. Staff concurs that the installation of these lights and wall mounted planter would create a more distinctive sense of place and serve as an additional human scale element, reducing the impact of the parking spaces by drawing attention to the entryway, decorative planter, and pedestrian courtyard.  b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Staff Comment: The applicant contends the proposed storage building reflects the siding, and roof style used on the existing building 1906 converted single family residence, creating a cohesive style and appearance between the primary structure and the new accessory structure. The storage building would also be painted to match the primary structure to ensure continuity. The applicant is proposing decorative solar lighting at the entrance, an overhang above the entryway to accentuate the access point, and a decorative planter box on the street facing façade to maintain a pedestrian scale, and improve the appearance of the building. Staff concurs that the inclusion of these design elements would meet the intent and the guidelines of Urban Design District A regulations. DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Modification Report & Decision MONACO LLC URBAN MODIFICATION REQUEST LUA18-000448, MOD August 15, 2018 Page 4 of 6 The applicant is also proposing parking along the existing alley to minimize visual impact and create a safer pedestrian environment. Vehicles would access the site off of the alley rather than Morris Avenue, eliminating the necessity for a curb cut along the public street. Staff concurs that the combined design features would meet the intended purpose and objective of the code.  c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: The applicant contends that the planter strip will serve as a visual and physical barrier separating the storage building and parking area from the public right- of-way, which would improve the appearance of the property and increase safety of the parking area. Staff concurs that the proposed improvements would visually improve the site as seen from the street, as the site is currently landscaped with grass. It is not anticipated that the proposal will be injurious to the other properties in the vicinity.  d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘a’ and ‘b’.  e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘a’ and ‘b’.  f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘c’. Compliant if condition of approval are met g. The project as a whole meets the intent of the minimum standards and guidelines in subsections E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7 of the design regulations Staff Comment: The applicant proposes the entryway to the storage structure to be oriented north towards the primary structure and away from the street. Per RMC 4-3- 100E.1 standards, the front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian-only courtyard. Due to the appurtenant nature of the structure staff concurs that a northern orientation still meets the intent of RMC 4-3-100E.1, which intends to ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas, and other land uses; and to increase privacy for residential uses. This orientation connects the appurtenant structure with the primary office use of the property which already meets the intent of the code. Staff concurs that when viewed holistically, the site meets the intent of the minimum standards and guidelines, provided conditions of approval are met, as noted above in subsection a. Compliant if conditions of approval are met h. The requested modification meets the intent and guidelines of the applicable design standard Staff Comment: The proposal includes two (2) garage doors on the Eastern façade of the proposed storage structure, and blank walls on the western and southern façade. RMC 4-3-100E.5 calls for any façade visible to the public shall be comprised of at least fifty percent (50%) transparent windows and/or doors for at least the portion of the ground floor façade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). Furthermore, all building façades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). Staff notes that as proposed the storage building would not meet these standards. However, due to subordinate nature of the structure the intent and guidelines of the code could be met through minor alterations to the proposed building as flows: 1) The garage doors be relocated to the southern façade facing the alley; 2) Windows are added on the eastern façade facing Morris Ave S, constituting at least 25% of the building façade; and 3) Articulation be DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Modification Report & Decision MONACO LLC URBAN MODIFICATION REQUEST LUA18-000448, MOD August 15, 2018 Page 5 of 6 added to the western façade, which may include lightning, trellis, planter boxes, or other design elements approved by the Current Planning Project Manager. Treatment pursuant to RMC 4-3-100E.5 may also be utilized in place of articulation for the western façade of the storage structure. In order for the proposed stricter to meet the intent and the guidelines of the applicable design standards, staff recommends as conditions of approval that the preceding design recommendations be reflected in revised building plans at time of building permit application.  i. The modification will not have a detrimental effect on nearby properties and the City as a whole; Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘c’ and h. Compliant if Conditions are Met. j. The deviation manifests high quality design; and Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘h’ and the associated recommended conditions. Compliant if Conditions are Met. k. The modification will enhance the pedestrian environment on the abutting and/or adjacent streets and/or pathways. Staff Comment: See comments under criterion ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘h’ and the associated recommended conditions. E. DECISION: The proposal satisfies 11 of the 11 criteria listed in RMC 4-9-250D and 4-3-100F for approval of modifications, provided all the conditions are met. Therefore, the Monaco LLC Urban Design Mod, File No. LUA18-000448, is approved and is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall amended the design of the proposed garage per the following: a. The garage shall be reoriented to place the garage doors on the southern façade, facing the alley; and Windows shall be installed on the eastern façade of the proposed storage structure, constituting at least 25% of the building façade; and Articulation shall be provided on all building façades which may include lightning, trellis, planter boxes, or other design elements approved by the Current Planning Project Manager; The above building modifications shall be reflected in the revised building permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan at time of building permit application showing: a. Two (2) Japanese flowering cherry trees or another tree approved by the Current Planning Project Manager located in the proposed on-site landscape strip along Morris Avenue South. b. A minimum of two (2) types of shrubs to be approved by the Current Planning Project Manager and sited pursuant to RMC 4-4-070L.3. Staff recommends Wax Myrtles and Oregon Grapes. c. Strawberry bushes used as ground cover, and sited pursuant to RMC 4-4-070L.2. The revised landscape plan shall be approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Date DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD 8/15/2018 | 9:19 AM PDT City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Modification Report & Decision MONACO LLC URBAN MODIFICATION REQUEST LUA18-000448, MOD August 15, 2018 Page 6 of 6 TRANSMITTED this 15 day of August, 2018 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact: Owner: Applicant: Monaco LLC 423 S. 3rd Street Renton, WA 98057 John Fuchs 1724 Cole Street, Ste. 10 Enumclaw, WA 98022 TRANSMITTED this 14th day of August, 2018 to the following: Chip Vincent, CED Administrator Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Amanda Askren, Property and Technical Services Manager Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Project Manager Rick Marshall, Fire Marshal K. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION: The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on August 29th, 2018. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14- day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680), together with the required fee to the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Modification decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-250. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD 423 S 3rd St Renton, WA 98057 Justification for Modification request: Our building on the corner of S 3rd and Morris is an existing office structure that is over 100 years old. The structure was likely a house initially but was converted to an office decades ago. It is apparent that the rear of the lot has likely been used for parking although it does not appear that a garage has ever been present there, unlike the neighboring properties which have them. In an effort to have a simple storage building, supporting our office, built we are asking for some modifications from typical new construction standards for the following reasons: 1. We would like to have a consistent setback with that of our existing "anchor" building. 2. We are beholden to the look of the larger, existing building and therefore trying to tie in some consistency in building design and materials. 3. While this will be a "new" building, it will exist to support the primary building on the property which has remained virtually unchanged for 60+ years, and has Hardy siding and composite roofing. Furthermore, after much discussion, we have made the following concessions in an effort to achieve the City's objectives: 1. We've moved the proposed site of the structure northward, reducing our yard-space in order to add parking along the alley, per City request. 2. We've added a 10 ft (a quarter of our property width) planting strip along the Morris St. sidewalk at the rear of the lot, in an effort to buffer our loading area from the parking strip along Morris. 3. We've added design cues and changed construction material in order to more closely match our primary building, as well as adding trim features, decorative (Solar Powered) light fixtures and additional colors to improve the original design. Hopefully, these compromises, along with the design improvements will be sufficient to justify a the modification. We are in the building maintenance business and have every intention of this being a nice improvement to our neighborhood that is consistent with what we have purchased. Thank you for your consideration! DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD RECEIVED 06/27/2018 jtaylor PLANNING DIVISION DocuSign Envelope ID: D7EEC7B4-D18B-4601-93C8-5DFC0C4AFDAD