HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/07/2018 - Minutes Parks,Trails and Cammunity Facilities Initiative
Community Advisory Commiktee
Meeting 5ummary for Meeting#4-March 7,2018
Attendin�:
Advisory Committee Memhers:
AI Dieckman � Jeannie Seil �
Angelina Benedetti � Jeffrey Kelly ,J
Bob Reeder (CAC Vice Chair) Melody Kroeger
Brendan Armstrong � Mij Charbonneau .f
Brian Kaelin � Mitch Shepherd �J
Colin Walker Rocale Timmons �f
Dana Rochex �f Ted Rodriguez �
�evin Malkin Tim Searing (CAC Chair) �
Dr. Linda Smith ,f
City Staff and Others:
Ed Prince � l.eslie Betlach ,f
Caral Ann Witschi Steve Brown ,J
Jay Co�ington � 5tefanie Coleman ,f
Kelly Beymer � Cailin HunsakQr ,f
Jan hlawn � Karen Reed �f
Dana Appel Maryjane Van Cleave �f
Misty Baker � Mayor Law
Meeting Commenced: 4:83pm
1. Welcome
Tim 5earing welcomed everyor�e. Agenda was re�iewed. Today's meeting will be a discussion on
rating criteria far the list of projects.
2. It was mo�ed and seconded to accept and approve the Meeting 3 Summary.
3. The questions that have been accumulated are compiled on thQ QueStions Tracking sheet, with most
of the question5 address. This document is in tonight's f�andout�Oacket. Continue to use the 3x5
cards#o record any questions that come ta mind {include name, wi�l be kept confidential�;there are
a few questions tF�at were submitted, that staff wil! address at Meeting 5.
4. ReviewQd Charter from Meeting 1. Recapped elements. It was moved and seconded to accept and
approve the Charter, reflecting the updated number of inembers, being 17, not 18 as in the original
charter.
5. Kelly ga�� a presentation, Q&A: Geographic Equity--Where are the Gaps?See PowerFoint for
details.
Q: Why daesn't the City want to acquire parkland under 2 acres in size?
A: Neighborhood parks are usually not und�r 2 acres, as it is labor-intensi�e and expensive to
maintain.
-Z-
Q� Are kids' playground represented in Slide 17 and 18?
A: Yes,they are included in current assets (parks, etc).
6. lCaren starteti the discussion on rating criteria. Meetings 4 and 5 will be discussions on the projects,
meetings 6 and 7 will be abo�t funding. In r�viewing the handouts, committee members wi11 rate
each project on up to 3 questions. Much discussion an criteria, weighing of ques#ions, what
questions to rate them on, geographic equity, how to identify legacy and quick wins, and which of all
the projects to actually rate.
a. The project list pro�ides projects identified in the Parksr Recreation and Natural Areas
Plan. It was decided that staff wial include the 6-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
projects into this scoring exercise, The bottom of the list are 'struck thraugh' projects that
were identified as p�ojects not suitable for the initiati�e. "Quick Wins"will only be
Deferred Maintenance projects that stafF will identify, as they will be projects that can be
campleted in two years.
b. Karen re�iewed the handout:Summary of Evaluation Criteria used in t�e 3 Plans" and the
"Praposed Strategic Criteria".
c. The questions identi�ied for the first round of project rating:
i, Will thi$ be a praject that is attractive/exciting to Renton residents?
ii. Will this project likely have support of business community as well as residents?
iii. Will this praject address geograph�c equity or other systemic gaps#hat you belie�e
are important to address?
d. The mat�ix will be mailed ta cammittee members by Monday, March 12th to scare each
project an the three que5tions.The matrix,with a ballot must be returned to city staff
(Roberta Graver, r�raver@rentonwa.�ov� by 4:OOpm Friday, Marchl6th.
7. Next Meetin�A�enda: Meeting#5 will cover further discussian an the criteria and how the rating af
prnjects turned out. Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 21, 4:40pm, 7th Floor
Conferencing Center.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:43pm.
Meeting Summary Appro�ed: _� Date:
-�-