Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA_MasterApplication_181022_v1.pdfDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor | Renton, WA 98057| 425-430-7200 www.rentonwa.gov LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ADDRESS: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR’S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): COMPANY (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev: 10/2017 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): g SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): g SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): g SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 6,49s NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (¡f applicable): 6,4g5 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): g PROJECT INFORMATION cont¡nu l, (Print Name/s)Tom Bean Washington I am (please check one)the current owner of the p declare under penalty of perjury under the roperty involved in this application or l¡ll laws of the State of the authorized rep act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contai the i herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief flcr I of Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHTNGTON ) )SS couNTY oF K|NG ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that-Tk-ìornqs c. Bean signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. to/r qlzotR ttg Dated Notary Public in and for the State of ington lrDPI D. EtN1\ Notary (Print): My appointment expires 2 PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): tr AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE tr AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO E¡ FLOOD HAZARDAREA tr GEOLOGIC HAZARD E HABITAT CONSERVATION @ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES tr WETLANDS 210,07( sq. ft 281,34( sq. ft. -sq ft. 136,50'sq ft. - sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leqal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 13 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 4 ,IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP o e Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc z f rzlzolq Rev: I0/2OI7 H KingCounty Water and Land Resources Division Gate 1: Project Authorization Objective: Formally authorize the project manager to proceed with a county capital project. Gate I Project Authorization I have reviewed and approved the attached Charter and authorize the project manager to proceed with the project. H í lo lCommittee Chair Manager to- tt- lf Date Supervisor /¿./ê.t* Date utive DÍrector Date This represents the Project Authorization date qndwhen the Project Charter was formally accepted by Water & Land Resources Division Management in accordance with applicable Divis ionJevel procedures. lnclude ìhe otriciat'Project Name" as stated in the budget submnsion. lnclude "subproject Numbef'if apprcpriate. ldenttfy "Prciect Sponsor/Client" as defined by Agency. "Prcject Managef' is a mandatory entry. "Project Team" and "Key Stakeholders" arc optional entnþs if not identified at this point. Project Name Black River Pump Station Facility Improvements Project Number 1129574 (High-Use Engines) and others to follow Project Sponsor/ Client King County Flood Control District Project Manager Tom Bean, Engineering Special Projects Lead Project ldentification Most prcjects will conform lully with the general rcquirements esfaô/isl¡ed underWLRD's Prcject Management Manual. However, some projects (e.9. emergency prcjects or smaller repair prcjects) may be more effectively managed to meetthe prcject goals when exempted frcm poftions of fhe Manual. The Gate Committee t¡as fl¡e authority to waive or modify Manual requirements. lf applicable, authorized modifications to or waiving of Manual rcquirements and gate reyrews are documented he¡e. 1.The project charter initiates multiple phases of work, many of which will have independent project numbers. Gate I approvals will not be required for subsequent phases of Black River Pump Station Facility Improvements. Project Management Manual Scalability Determination Page I of 1 lfl KingCounty Water and Land Resources Division Proiect Gharter Version 01 Proiect Name Black River Pump Station Facility lmprovements Sponsor/Client Kinq Countv Flood Control District Project Number 1129574 (High-Use Engines) and 1129569 (Replace Control Bldg)Date 9t13t2017 Project Manager Tom Bean, Engineering Special Proiects Lead, RFMS CST Email tom. bean@kingcounty. gov Charter Objective: The objective of the charter is to document the information as it is known at the beginning of the project - not to get into the planning itself. A good charter creates a summary of the project. It's a very succinct way of sharing good, concrete information about the project with individuals who have questions about the project later. The project charter is a short, 3-4 page document that allows us to have that initial discussion, before launching into detailed planning. It is also a tool to make sure we've brought everyone together and have them on the same page regarding what the project needs to be. It's a very important step to deal with stakeholder expectations. Project Statement What is the project? Provide a brief sentence or two about what the project is. The Black River Pump Station (BRPS) is a critical component of the Green River flood control system. King County sponsored BRPS design and construction by the Soil Conservation Service. Most of the mechanical and electrical systems remain as designed in 1969 and many are obsolete. The Black River Needs Assessment and Capital Improvement Planning study (Tetra Tech 2015) recommended 7l specific improvements to facilitate reliable and efficient operation of the station. This project includes those 71 improvements, grouped in six phases for sequenced implementation over the next 1 I years. In addition, this project includes seismic analysis of the existing structure and, if necessary, remedial work to address seismic defrciencies. All six phases and the seismic work are being chartered together. Need/ Justification Why is it important to achieve the project scope, to be doing this project now? What is expected to be achieved by executing the project? This is a high level businessjustification. The BRPS holds tidewater and river flooding out of the Springbrook Creek channel, where water levels are kept low by the pumps in the station. Springbrook Creek carries runoff from a24.8 square mile urban watershed. Failure of the pump station would cause creek flows to back up, flooding portions of Renton, Kent and Tukwila. Reliable continuous operation of the station is critically important, and project priorities emphasize reliability improvements in phases 1,2,3,6, andfhe seismic evaluation/remediation. The BRPS was designed and built prior to the Endangered Species Act listing of Puget Sound Chinook and Puget Sound Steelhead, for which the Black River is critical habitat. The pump station is a complete blockage to natural fish migration, as it includes a 40 foot tall concrete dam across the entire Black River channel. Fish passage facilities are included in the original design, as are fish exclusion screens for four ofthe eight flood control pump inlets, but the existing station does not meet modern design standards for fish passage or fish exclusion. This project will bring those important systems up to contemporary standards, in accord with goal #2 of the adopted Flood HazardManagement Plan, which is "to avoid or minimize the environmental impacts of flood hazard management." This is emphasized in phases 4 and 5 of the project. Objectives/ Deliverables What will be the outcome of the project? What does the world look like when the project is done (what does DONE look like)? State the objectives to be SMART (Specific [clear & explicit], Measurable, Attainable, Relevant [what is the benefit gained] and Time-bound [completion date]). l. Assessment of seismic vulnerability and appropriate remedial retrofit 2. New electric motor for small pump P-l 3. New diesel engines with tier 4 emission controls for mid-size pumps P-2 andP-4 4. New control building with new control systems 5. New trash rake system 6. New screen spray system Page 1 of5 7. New fish passage systems 8. New screen bay sediment removal system 9. New fish screens on northern pumps (which have never had fish exclusion screens) 10. New diesel engines for large pumps P-3, P-5, P-6,P-7 and P-8 I I . Remainder of 71 recommendations per Tetra Tech (2015), such as procuring critical spare parts, overhauling pumps not ready for replacement, improving corrosion protection, and sealing the concrete in the utilþ trench 12. Permits and final approval documentation 13. Record Drawings 14. O&M Manual Revisions 15. Training for Operational Staff A st¿keholder is anyone who is involved, impacted, or perceives themselves as being impacted by a project. lVho is the project sponsor? What other stakeholders have already been identified? We can do a more detailed stakeholder analysis later but this lets people beei . Stakeholders Project Client - King County Flood Control District Stakeholders:¡ KC WTD - John Cameron or designee (pump station operations team)¡ KC WTD Subject Matter Experts: Pumps, Engines, Electrical, Controls, HVAC, Safety¡ National Resource Conservation Service (fka Soil Conservation Service, designed and built existing pump station) City of Renton (urisdiction and adjacent landowner) City of Tukwila (protected jurisdiction and sponsor of nearby federal levee) City of Kent (protected jurisdiction) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (manages river flows and levee safety programs) Drainage District I (manages upstream channel improvements) KC Parks (adjacent trail improvements) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe NOAA Fisheries USFWS WzuA 9 Salmon Habitat Recovery Team Herons Forever (wildlife advocates and habitat stewards) Washington State Department of Ecology (Dam Safety and Water Quality) Neighboring landowners Users of Black River Riparian Forest and Lake to Sound Trail (public park and trail adiacent to proiect site) Project Team Role and Responsibilities Who will be on the team? A¡e there some roles/responsibilities that need to be cla¡ified now before the detailed planning begins? Are you clear on your responsibilities as the project manager? L Core Team a. Tom Bean - Project Manager b. Mark Ruebel - Project Supervisor c. Tom Bloxton, RFMS CST Environmental Scientist II d. Mark Beggs, RFMS CST Engineer II e. Stella Torres, RFMS CST PPM II 2. Expanded Team a. Jessy Hardy, RFMS CST Engineer b. Chad Clay, WTD Operations Supervisor - primary point of contact for systems on site c. Tammy Carbaugh - RFMS Contract Specialist Supervisor d. Leslie Brown - RFMS Communications Manager e. Fatin Kara - Green River Basin Supervisor Page 2 of 5 High-Level Schedule List month & year for start and end of overall project and each phase of t}le project. May include key milestone dates if known. The Needs Assessment identified 7l specifrc tasks, each of which was prioritized and recommended for implementation within 2, 5, 10, or 20 years. On a high level, these Needs Assessment recommendations will generally guide the sequence of design and implementation. Following is a rough projection of project timing. Detailed project management planning will follow as part of Phase l: Phase -Construction Ph.l-Use 20182019 2019 Ph.2-Control 2018-2020 2019-2020 Ph.3-2019-2020 I Ph. 4 - Fish 2021-2023 2022-2024 Ph. 5 - Fish Screen Extension 2024-2025 2025-2026 Ph.6-2027 2028 Seismic Evaluation &2017-TBD TBD Initial Assumptions What high-level assumptions have already been made about the project? 1 The project requires subject matter expertise on a broad range of disciplines, some not available among V/LRD staff. Consultant teams should provide this expertise. 2. Design input and review by in-house WTD subject matter experts is desirable but may not be available. WTD subject matter experts should be invited to participate. 3. Critical system upgrades have been identified and prioritized at a planning level (Tetra Tech 2015), but the physical scope of work, schedule and cost estimates will need refinement as design analysis proceeds. 4. Analysis proposed in early project phases will help to inform and refine fish passage concepts. Fish passage expertise will be an important factor in consultant selection. Analysis may prompt revision of fish passage concepts before design and implementation occur. 5. Seismic liquefaction hazards may require remedial work beyond the Tetra Tech recommendations. Any seismic work is assumed to involve retrofits to the existing structure or its foundation materials without massive demolition and reconstruction. This assumption will be examined as an early design issue in order to confirm that remedial measures can reasonably be completed as a retrofit. 6. Flood containment improvements (additional freeboard) may be necessary for compatibility with levee system improvements being considered by the Lower Green River Corridor Plan. Containment improvements were not included in the Tetra Tech recommendations, but this project should include containment improvements to the pump station structure as necessary for consistency with the Corridor Plan. 7. Pump station function is to be maintained at all times during construction so that upstream property is protected from flooding throughout the improvement process. Page 3 of 5 Risks What are main high-level risks that have already been identifìed? This is all about uncertainty. What do you, or other people, think could go wrong on the project? l. The project team may not have timely access to subject matter expertise from WTD. 2. Evaluation of seismic risks and remedies may prompt adjustment of the phasing and implementation sequence for other tasks. 3. Evaluation of fish habitat conditions and uses may prompt adjustment of the concepts, ^1^^^:-^ ^-l ;'.-l^*^-+^+:^- ¡:^- f:^L +^^1,^ ^^Ä *^-, L:^L|:^L¡ ^1.,^-^^P¡lqù¡rró 4rru rrrrPlvrrlvl¡¡ortvrr ùv{uçrrvv ¡vl l l)ll P4ùùqév t4JAù, 4tlu rrral tttËltttËlr[ 4uvçl ùç impacts to fish and wildlife, possibly including harm to ESA-listed species, attributable to status quo facilities and operations at BRPS. 4. Normal operation of the pump station could be compromised by some portions of the improvement work. While construction tasks will be scheduled at the most tävorable times of year, the risk of unexpected high flow during critical phases of construction cannot be eliminated. This could lead to project delays and costs, possibly including liability for off- site damages that the station would otherwise prevent. 5. This project is being led by the Capital Strike Team. In the event of significant flooding, CST priorities may favor flood damage repairs, potentially limiting staff resources available for this project. Constraints/ Boundaries Are there specific items that a¡e NOT within the scope of the project? There's an infinite number of things not in the project, but remembe¡ this document is about clari$ing stakeholder expectations. l. This project will not evaluate or revise the nominal discharge capacity of the pump station (although it does include testing to determine actual performance of the pumps). 2. This project will not evaluate or improve the levee system, except along the pump station outlet channel, because levee system improvement priorities are being considered in the Lower Green River Corridor Plan. 3. This project may generate information helpful for revision of the Pump Operations Procedures Plan (POPP), but POPP revision is not in the project scope. Planning Level Cost Range What is the expected project cost through the life of the project? Include contingencies and allied costs (design, permitting, staff labor) and where appropriate, estimated cash flow for the project. Present the project cost range to correspond with the initial schedule assumptions adjusted as appropriate to recognize the very preliminary nature of this cost estimate. Planning level cost estimates were given by Tetra Tech (2015), including design and construction costs with contingency factors that varied according to the relative uncertainties of individual line items. In addition, this project will include seismic analysis and related remedial work for which no planning study has yet been done; the cost estimate for this item is little more than a placeholder, based upon general budget guidance for school district facilþ managers, without contingencies to cover the large uncertainty. Page 4 of 5 Sustainability Development Programs Discuss how this project will address the County directives related to environmental sustainability, such as: climate change; green building and sustainable development practices for capital projects (e.g., LEED Certification, or cost-effective sustainable practices); energy efficiency; conservation and cost savings; and any other related County directives in this area. This project will integrate cost-effective sustainable practices such as reusing and recycling materials where possible and using locally sourced products and plants. Site disturbance will be minimized and restoration will be done with native vegetation in order to minimize maintenance costs. Alternative construction methods will be considered to reduce constructions costs and impacts to public and private properties. Equity and Social Justice (ESÐ Program Discuss how this project will address the County directives related to Equity and Social Justice (ESJ) Ordinance 16948. The ordinance calls for a focus on both equity in the development and decision processes (process equity) and equity in the distribution ofproject benefits and burdens (distributional equity). htto ://www.kinscountv. sov/exec/eo uitv/vision.¿¡spx This project will follow BDCC advice for utilization of Small Contractor and Supplier (SCS) certified firms and qualified apprentice labor to support equity with living-wage jobs and job training. Project Approval Process Identi$ who evaluates and decides on project continuance at intermediate review milestones, as well as project success, and gives ultimate sign-offofproject completion. Agencies may refer to other standard processes ofproject acceptance ifused within that agency. WLR Division gate approvals will be structured as follows: 1. Project Charter - this charter will serve to initiate all project phases. The FCD may decide to review the charter. One PMP will be developed for all project phases, with a single Gate lB review of the total-project PMP. 2. Alternative Selection - each project phase will include gate approval of preferred alternative. The FCD will determine which, if any, altemative selections it wishes to make. 3. Baseline - each project phase will be baselined at or near 30% design 4. Closeout - each project phase will be presented at closeout. The closeout document for the final phase will also close out the chartered project. The Project Manager will coordinate review of 30o/o, 600/0, 90o/o and 100% design materials. The Project Manager will solicit NRCS (fka SCS) review of design materials in accord with the original Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and give due consideration to any comments received. Decision Making Process What will be the decision making process(es) for the project? Day-to-day decisions will be made by the Project Manager and reported to the Project Supervisor, Technical issues will be brought to project team for discussion. Project team will work to achieve consensus. When team does not have consensus, Project Manager will bring team input to Project Supervisor for consideration. Project Manager and Project Supervisor then make decision and communicate outcome to the team. Success Criteria What will be the criteria for judging the project successful? l. Unintenupted operation ofpump station throughout the term ofthe project. 2. Timely progress that meets scheduled deadlines. 3. Expenses within budget. Signatures /, Optional - List signatories and obtain their signatures memorializing they have read and agree with the Charter. TypicaJly the core project team members sign . The clienlsponsor by signing the Gate I authorization Ñ,fWn#harter as an attachment, ag¡ees to the cha¡ter. ¡I#^f?*'t ffiMffi^ Stella Tores Page 5 of 5