The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 4360CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 4360 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR KENT, ISSAQUAH, AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts; and WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts each have requested that the City of Renton adopt their District's current Capital Facilities Plans; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Kent School District have been calculated at $5,397 per single family dwelling unit, and $2,279 per new multi -family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior rates of $5,235 and $2,267, respectively; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Issaquah School District Capital Facilities plan, the school impact fee rates for the Issaquah School District have been calculated at $15,276 per single family dwelling unit, and $4,399 per new multi -family dwelling unit, an increase from the prior rates of $8,762 and $3,461, respectively; and WHEREAS, as established in the current Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan, the school impact fee rates for the Renton School District have been calculated at $6,877 per single family dwelling unit, and $2,455 per new multi -family dwelling unit, a decrease from the prior single family dwelling unit rate of $7,772 and an increase from the prior multi -family dwelling unit rate of $1,570; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4360 WHEREAS, the rate charged on behalf of each District is listed in the City of Renton Fee Schedule; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans, including adopting the school impact fee rates set forth in those Capital Facilities Plans to take effect on January 1, 2019, and which will be listed in an updated City of Renton Fee Schedule: 2018; A. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2019 - 2023-2024, dated April B. The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated May 23, 2018; and C. The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated May 2018. SECTION II. Copies of each Capital Facilities Plan adopted herein by reference will be on file with the City Clerk. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19th day of November, 2018. JasorVA. Seth, Oily Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of November, 2018. Denis Law, Mayor 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4360 Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, Cit ttorney RES:1784:10/2/18:scr 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted May 23, 2018 Resolution No. 1116 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................3 STANDARD OF SERVICE.......................................................................4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION..............................................................5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING...................................................................5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES......................................................................6 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY.............................................................8 TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2009-10 through 2017-18 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2018-19 through 2032-33 ...................9 TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY ............................10 TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI -FAMILY ...........................1 1 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ......................12 SITE LOCATION MAP..........................................................................13 SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN........................................................14 TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS .............14 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS.................................................15 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .........16 APPENDIX A: 2017-18 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES...................17 APPENDIX B: 2017-18 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................18 APPENDIX C: 2017-18 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES...............................19 APPENDIX D: 2017-18 DISTRICT TOTAL CAPACITIES ............................ 20 APPENDIX E: SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN...............................................21 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in May, 2018. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six -Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re -locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by 1-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation that requires the State to fund Full -Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full - Day Kindergarten for the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school cannot be used. The District recently sold this planned site to a third party. The District will need to locate alternative sites inside the UGBL. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. Approved Bond funding provides for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. 4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the re-build/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to five existing elementary schools to meet the needs of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The planned facilities will be funded by a bond passed on April 26, 2016, school impact fees and reserve funds held by the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi -family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. Generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi -family housing is shown on page 10 and page 11. NEED FOR IMPACT FEES Impact fees and state matching funds have not been a reliable source of revenue. Because of this, the Issaquah School District asked its voters on February 7, 2006 to fund the construction of an elementary school, one middle school, expand Maywood Middle School, expand Liberty High School, and rebuild Issaquah High School. District voters also approved on April 17, 2012 a ballot measure that provided funding to expand two elementary schools, rebuild/expand two additional elementary schools, add classrooms to one high school and rebuild/expand one middle school. Due to the high cost of land and the limited availability of a parcel large enough to accommodate a middle school program, the School Board reallocated the moneys designated to build the middle school to expand the capacity of Issaquah and Skyline high schools. On April 26, 2016 voters approved bond funding for the construction of a new high school, a new middle school and two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 17) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 100%) to serve 8288 students at the elementary level. Appendix B, (page 18) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) for 4480 students at the middle school level Appendix C (page 19) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) of 5580 students at the high school level. Current enrollment is identified on page 9. The District elementary projected Oct 2018 FTE is 9658. Adjusting permanent capacity by 95% leaves the District's elementary enrollment over permanent capacity at the elementary level by 1784 students (Appendix A). At the middle school level, the projected Oct 2018 headcount is 5034. This is 778 students over permanent capacity (Appendix B). At the high school level the district is over permanent capacity by 479 students (Appendix C). Based on the District's student generation rates, the District expects that 0.763 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.24 students will be generated from each new multi -family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District's existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2023-24, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 1986 students, at the middle school level by 1117 students, and will be over its permanent capacity by 1382 at the high school level. The District's enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival — historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. 6 To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six -year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Projected Location Additional Expansions Completion Date Capacity New High School 2021 Issaquah 1600 New Middle School 2021 Issaquah 850 Rebuild/Expand Pine Lake Middle 2018 Sammamish 242 New Elementary #16 2020 Issaquah 680 New Elementary #17 2021 Sammamish 680 Expand Cougar Ridge Elementary 2018 Bellevue 120 Expand Discovery Elementary 2019 Sammamish 120 Expand Endeavour Elementary 2019 King County 120 Expand Maple Hills Elementary 2020 King County 120 Expand Sunset Elementary 2018 Bellevue 120 Creekside Elementary Portable 2018 Sammamish 40 Maple Hills Elementary Portable 2018 King County 40 Challenger Elementary Portable 2018 Sammamish 40 Pine Lake Middle School Portable 2018 Sammamish 56 Sunny Hills Elementary Portables 2018 Sammamish 80 Issaquah Middle School Portables 2018 Issaquah 208 Issaquah High School Portable 2018 Issaquah 56 Maywood Middle School Portable 2018 King County 56 Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are necessary to serve students generated by new development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi -family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted further. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 - .100 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., seek to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new dwelling units are converted to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. Enrollment projections for the years 2018-2019 through 2032-2033 are shown in Table One. Student generation factors are shown in Table Two and Table Three. TABLE ONE: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2009-10 through 2017-18 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2018-19 through 2032-33 FTE EnrGUment Yea K 1ST ZVD M SIH 5M 6TH 7TH ETH 9M IM 11IH 12TH TOW K-5 64 9-li Total 2DR9-la 593 1319 1351 12M 1371 12M IM 179 I255 1325 1171 1IT! 1147 MUM 7NIJ 3UO 477 15))07 291D-11 613 LM 1355 1385 1319 1400 IM Md 12PE 1326 1333 RID 1015 Idim 741M 3M 4783 14.➢38 2011-12 6W 1396 1423 1374 1417 1346 14' L311 L146 I34I 1319 I?U 1021 Memo 7545 4C" 4934 16.w 2012-13 651 136I 1467 1496 1440 1448 1,02 1447 1339 1412 1353 IZ25 U46 17 2013-14 654 1499 1414 1536 149E 1477 14w- 1391 1463 L444 14W 12D 111 17A* M59 4316 5091 17,96 2014-15 6W 1494 1552 1478 L%5 1555 1312 1*1 I432 105 13M 3292 1115 16,406 8317 4435 5 ISX6 ZOW16 661 1547 155E MS 1548 1iM I600 I55? IP-0 14T2 1489 11B} 1116 WAS m 46'rl 1254 IRAO, 24i6-19+ 1403 1423 16Y3 1609 1650 IW4 I626 IW-6 iiW 1565 14. MO MR "AN 9376 4907 53.93 19,6D6 2U"B 14r. 1%1 153f 101 1611 163D I627 1655 I692 1E9 1545 1243 116' ZRP" 95>6 49B 5 *aAim 2018-19 13-4' 1611 1617 1590 1716 1678 170 1551 16?7 Iff" 1619 Il37L 111 n;,M a76a 5M 5720 MA72 2019-26 1311 I610 16M 1675 1&4 1753 1711 1733 UEO 171.3 1670 M6 1243 29P6 971D 5i23 60B 2m895 2021-21 1406 I530 1670 1739 1723 160 I7PO 1739 17D Mb 1?W 1474 1306 21XW 971P, r^._E =D ZI" IM 22 1398 15M 1539 l72? 1760 1752 I693 1815 I7S IlV5 1706 1505 1350 21r1%'3 9791 52-2 63a5 21,41E 2922-23 1396 1556 1611 11547 1757 1796 1779 1719 IM 1?9i 1792 15U7 1376 21 n 9773 53M 040 2115M 2623-24 1535 1557 IM 1678 1673 1795 =5 I805 1743 19 r 1'S7 159_' 13. n OR 935E 5m 663E 21AM 2021-25 15.8 1695 1616 JM 17.11 1717 =5 1851 U00 1779 1SE Il594 1464 njM 9954 55W dM9 EZ160 MS-26 IW 17E9 1754 1673 170S 1749 1747 1851 EM 1866 1768 IM7 1467 W71 10131 5474 67P W71 2026 27 1557 I707 1761 1811 1705 1743 rrm 1772 rv6 19II 1$55 1373 22fi84 laM 54 T W9 22,587 2"728 156E 1716 1765 1818 IM 1742 ITT2 1834 I73r7 1911 "M 1660 1445 22,70 1045T_ 5373 d9I5 22,7Aa 202E-29 1550 1729 1775 1922 1850 18SIl ITT? 179S 1129 IM ON 1707 221973 im 533 WE Z"75 7CGG.29-30 1553 1710 1786 W2 1954 1M 1910 I79S 12M IM = 1?06 L5V ZRAU 10623 Ml W., ZJAU 2430,31 1555 I713 1768 1843 18M 184- 1919 I936 I323 IBM IRU 1673 153 232" 106i5 -w- 6916 7szr 2031,32 1536 I715 1771 1825 I875 NM 190-1 19" L961 1953 1.847 IIC69 23,333 106" ms 73333 203223 1556 1716 1773 I= 1837 1913 1931 1947 L90 M 6 184? 16M 1531 TZ1 3 IN" 5S4 , M" 23" M r♦r `7 Era;mEr11 m(If= She 3d1116n Li .'tZE FLMdM F111 COaj MCEWrIlE TABLE TWO: STUDENT FACTORS -SINGLE FAMILY 2017-18 Single Family Single Family Development Belvedere Cavalia Cedarcroft Claremont @ Renton Forest Heights Glencoe, Preswick & Kinlock @ Trossachs Heritage Estates Highcroft @ Sammamish Issaquah Highlands Issaquah Highlands - Ichijo Sun Ridge Lawson Park Liberty Gardens Overlook @ Brookshire Summit Pickering/Inneswood Estates Rivenwood Shorelane Vistas Symphony Ridge (new area) TOTALS SINGLE FAMILY Elementary School Middle School 6 - 8 High School 9 -12 TOTAL STUDENTS # Planned # Sold K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 94 92 42 17 20 79 49 49 21 12 22 55 27 4 0 0 1 1 91 91 18 3 12 33 24 6 0 1 0 1 211 198 80 45 76 201 86 86 57 20 18 95 121 120 48 19 27 94 311 236 42 27 61 130 35 35 11 5 12 28 31 31 20 6 8 34 36 36 3 1 5 9 38 36 7 2 1 10 30 21 10 9 11 30 52 52 20 8 13 41 38 38 8 6 13 27 57 51 19 6 9 34 1331 1182 406 187 309 902 0.343 0.158 0.261 0.763 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years 10 AVERAGE PER UNIT K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 0.457 0.185 0.217 0.859 0.429 0.245 0.449 1.122 0 0 0.25 0-25 0.198 0.033 0.132 0.363 0 0.167 0 0.167 0.404 0.227 0.384 1.015 0.663 0233 0.209 1.105 0.4 0.158 0.225 0.783 0.178 0.114 0.258 0-551 0.314 0.143 0.343 0.8 0.645 0.194 0.258 1.097 0.083 0-028 0.139 0.25 0.194 0.056 0.028 0.278 0.476 0.429 0.524 1.429 0.385 0.154 0.25 0.788 0.211 0158 0.342 0.711 0.373 0-118 0.176 0.667 0.343 0.168 0.261 0.763 TABLE THREE: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI -FAMILY 2017-18 Multi Family STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT Multi Family Development # Planned # Sold K-5 6-8 9-12 Total Avalon Bay 900 7 3 0 1 4 Issaquah Highlands -View Ridge 38 38 10 8 7 25 Issaquah Highlands -The Brownstones 175 175 19 11 15 45 Lake Boren Townhomes 56 56 2 1 1 4 Lakehouse 41 17 4 0 1 5 Overlook @ Brookshire 42 42 2 1 0 3 Talus: Spring Peak 28 28 0 0 1 1 TOTALS 1280 363 40 21 26 87 MULTI FAMILY Elementary School Middle School 6 - 8 High School 9 -12 TOTAL 0.110 0.058 0.072 0.240 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past fire years. K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 0.429 0.000 0.143 0.571 0.263 0.211 0.184 0.658 0.109 0.063 0.086 0.257 0.036 0.018 0.018 0.071 0.235 0.000 0.059 0.294 0.048 0.024 0.000 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.036 0.110 0.058 0.072 0.240 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 17431 students in permanent facilities and 4195 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the 2018- 2019 school year is expected to be 20472 including K-5 FTE which leaves a permanent capacity deficit of 3041. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations gives us a capacity of 21626 with a surplus capacity of 1154 for the K-12 student population. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 1171h Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. SE, Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 16711 Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah -Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah -Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32"d Street, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2"d Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah -Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3200 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish 12 �.1 to �earl�r •Calag� ,� M Asdeje wuguAr��fr�r war 9d w � • Nexa we � ..�uY_ Qy I. coftef [ ; 3v ft" Mayw od ■ Mladle 3w�e+ pentw,wpr.y��R SITE LOCATION MAP ■ SkyHno High School ' � 0lsavery 5inny Hills pine Lake Clwillengen Muddle Babver laic MMdIe 405 ■ Pacific Cascade Uladie maplowills e 6rarod Rklp ■ h9 quab Middf e ■Issaquah High Ater R' S14 ■ Echo 6kn {hiidren{e agend ■ Bcrwtjrj5dmI ■ Middfi fth Stood M Adminss *igflI5uppar smic 5 ON I 13 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table Four is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 20,472 FTE students for the 2018-2019 school year and 21,862 FTE students in the 2023-2024 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth -related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. TABLE FOUR: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS Projected Capacity to House Students Years 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Permanent Capacity 17826 18348 18348 19028 22158 22158 High School 56 1600 Middle School 346 850 Elementary School 120 680 680 Gross Totals 18348 18348 19028 22158 22158 22158 *Subtotal (Sum at 95% Utilization Rate) 17431 17431 18077 21050 210501 21050 Portables @ 95% 4195 4195 4195 4195 4195 4195 Total Capacity 21626 21626 22272 25245 25245 25245 Projected FTE Enrollment" 20472 20896 21199 21418 21571 21862 Permanent Capacity @ 95% (surplus/deficit -3041 -3465 -3122 -368 -521 -812 Permanent Cap w/Portables (surplus/deficit 1154 730 1073 3827 3674 3383 * Permanent Capacity and New Construction calculations are based on the 95% utilization factors (see Appendix D) The number of planned portables may be reduced if permanent capacity is increased by a future bond issue. 14 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT Issaquah SD #411 YEAR 2018 School Site Acquisition Cost: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.00 $1,000,000 680' 0.343' 0.110 $3,536 $1,134 Middle/Jr High 10.00 $1,000,000 850 ' 0.158' 0.058 $1,861 $681 High 30.00 $1,000,000 1,600 ' 0.261 ' 0.072 $4,902 $1,343 TOTAL $10,299 $3,158 School Construction Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Permanent/Total Sq Ft) Student Student %Penn/ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq.Ft. Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 92.37% $30,000,000 680 ' 0.343' 0.110 $13,998 $4,491 Middle/Jr High 92.37% $55,000,000 850 ' 0.158' 0.058 $9,456 $3,458 High 92.37% $95,000,000 1,600' 0.261 ' 0.072 $14,338 $3,928 TOTAL $37,791 $11,876 Temporary Facility Cost: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Temporary/Total Square Feet) Student Student %Temp/ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq.Ft. Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.63% $250,000 80 0.343 0.110 $82 $26 Middle/Jr High 7.63% $250,000 56 0.158 0.058 $54 $20 High 7.63% $250,000 224 0.261 0.072 $22 $6 TOTAL $158 $52 State Matching Credit: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor Student Student Current Area SPI District Factor Factor Cost/ Cosy Cost Allowance Footage Match % SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $225.97 90 8.00% 0.343 0.110 $559 $179 Middle/Jr High $225.97 108 0.00% 0.158 0.058 $0 $0 High School $225.97 130 0.00% 0.261 0.072 $0 $0 TOTAL $559 $179 Tax Payment Credit: SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $780,064 $321,036 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.85% 3.85% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $6,374,447 $2,623,446 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.49 $1.49 Present Value of Revenue Stream $9,498 $3,909 Fee Summary: Single Multi - Family Family Site Acquistion Costs $10,298.78 $3,157.92 Permanent Facility Cost $37,790.93 $11,876.49 Temporary Facility Cost $158.05 $52.08 State Match Credit ($558.85) ($179.28) Tax Payment Credit ($9,497.93) ($3,908.94) FEE (AS CALCULATED) $38,190.99 $10,998.27 Local Share $22,914.59 $6,598.96 FINAL FEE $15,276 $4,399 Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee. For the applicable fee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project. W BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • Elementary Two new sites are planned for purchase • Middle School One new site is planned for purchase • High School One new site is planned for purchase SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • Elementary $30,000,000 is the proportional cost of the project providing additional elementary capacity • Middle School $55,000,000 is the proportional costs of the projects providing additional middle school capacity • High School $95,000,000 is the proportional cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) Temporary Square Footage STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance Percentage of State Match 16 2,634,410 2,459,774 187,572 $225.97 39.54% 1 0 Z W rv/� y`1 'o W roe�/�bdb Q/oSWnWjXb� 1 �d'lcob _ V Q C.�� 1 V bdb, Ibc ko 0 N� 0 O ONg r0e) db'J SS�Sb1N� �'Sb1N0a `U)i NHS/� li Q �B1b��bdb y�A G OV A% y� W rZ0,a W WooN��y 0 & 1 N youb�ObN 64l/fib "bow% O�SS•`S•ybo% �O d/bONb1S-yO * S7ct yoS 'T b 0 o b m �p O n OD N b N O !'� M n N C M co .- to M N a- -a b N a inw W m 1 b m m b m to co 0 N � O n O � � OD w M m m N m m m r m M O M m tb m m O! m G1 R G1 ann C! Cl b M r M m M m M r r m a O m m N r r b to t0 m r N m t0 O b O 00 O N O to t° t° Go m 7 m O m m m m m m O m m N O m O r N b b m m r b m M r r r M m r m r co Co P...b M P. m r to N r a O o o o O o o o o O o o O O o o v m m tb N O O O O O O O O O O O N O b �in W N a o n i °O N m n m n co cm m n O m m P< n n aN m n to M O a a m O m m m m m m 0 m m N O n N OD b m b n b m M n n n M m n m cc CO n ID a n m m m m c0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N tD N Cl) O N 0O N t0 O N N O N Go t0 V 00 to to N r N ao t0 O M O CO O N O V CO N a 0) N g a a m a M a n 00 O m O tom m m m m 0 m co N O o m in b A a b m n b P. b O n n PAb CO O In n n mm W o N Go c0 r w O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t0 0 N O 0N M t0 M M M M M Cl) M Cl) t0 N to R N M t° M CO M M M M O M M t° 'T c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N in t0 t0 W O V N t0 R t° R to < IT V ITtt) W 0 U] 0c0 M V' t0 r O V7 CO r tr (0 N w N M N O N .- M r N I-- N N N N N r- N N W a N b co W).0 N t0 M w o CD it LU y � � w CC�JJ W z S Z Z F pO, w Q cn Q Co 0 0 U 0 U B W 0N 2 cn y A/o ti. ..xs�o J'O'/41 ba'bo N'�y /blo �bN %�y8r01? you, J (g� loll ffww v/ W III N /P loll0. 00 i<III 4 � J oN,s z 0 ( 1N,� a_ 0 -,Q'bb �� g k c ' J yO M- _ o U C "im r N OyJ2i, O ti S %0& .y y0 ( d .Sh' JbdbJ �ySS0 �, c c c � �D s yO N U U U � T � � m E c ��xxpp ym� L ID L 00 Ii 1,1■tlt lollI IIi1�1 1� 610 Os>"se6 4 ��1�j y�0y8 O &0� /pn 0°b, �es y'br� HBO ' . s''�9y1� pa'da� ary 0 J (8�J'�lijb�J Sh'�h,/Xb CO) W C 0%9 1 9 w (8t'J�b b �Ob yo 2 Go N CD byb J S'AbOB0 O& CD N �J/Oti Y O (82j bJ "bO, Sxv, �bbyo i s100 h'J syo/ y N Y Y eN- N rn m rn o m m o to y N N m N O N r- to N V O to N v O R N m v to to N N tt] N t0 N R N r to to tOo O O N N N to O O to 40 In 00 mN N e- N N N N fD m le tD N N N m co N O co 'T w Ln y N N IT O1 O 00 O to v O O N N y coo to CD N N Y N e- W to b N co IT CD m O N N IT m O to N to N to N m O to y N O N O t0 to r, to m m Of to to m W = W Er 0 U) z � y LU m S J C7 2 to F E� cq s��8�02 J MyO �0 N >p �j N U x '�iy dbO�j� CL o (It � 6d N E g W_ use W w 13 m CL U 0,Iby �y V Q 00 o Os� N ~ + 0 Z°y0s dbb Q Z N x c O. aJ ASS@ �dbyd J a J N N bbab O CL cc c0 Ns b W11q , U N v N '�iJ yO C a E ,,, G � c m � m °d is Ole O/0, �Lyp o -f1/Ob r MA a bjCc U d .%0 U kj c ca r m a N U N a 0 0 L D IO N N C L 3 N O C. O L fC 7 Cr IO O .L tlf r Q U w N N '�FE�pp f0 F N N U C r W - W L 300 a� X o 0 C N O � C Z LU = o0E l0 Ol U Cl - y ^�cc I.L N ■� N 3 N C LM 3 N a U 9� a Cl Cl CD U 0.6 p7� G N O C N N f0 L N U > 0 ? a's X N 0 N O w w Q C j . > > ° E Cg o O a Viglammmm C' 4 m w Y ulla�6E0 O 0 U > Tw >. N II •E S V 2 2 C a Q O N U L N V N r N O l0 O C M > a N 0 _ o aa) ca w � 0 L N N L Z ^' " N J 00 O fA N O a 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O p Cn pO O O pO O pO O pO O pO O pO O pO pO pO pO Iff rn m ui I. rn O C', � ai O O � O � O Si °D d9 J d 0 0 p O p O p O oo O p O p p pp p pp p 8p 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y a O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N a O w m N Cl N O o O p Qo O N O o p 0000 p p p pN pCp� p00 p00 p00 pOO O N O O O O m O aO d' � w p l'O N p� p� p Op p p p Op S pOp p6 8 g pOpp 00 pOpp 00 N00 �-+ Oa �O O � EH FA fA d9 po O00 po po O oo O pO O po O pO O pO O ow OO N pS O O pO O pO O O O O O 8 C07 N O O �Op f0 E09 ��Opp E9 fA V? � N fA fA EA fA d9 y pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO pO O p � CEO; O p C O p 00 O o 00 O p 00 O p 00 O p O p C O p C O p C O p C p 00 o p 00 0 w � Z Z Z Z � �� 2 Z Z N co h N m � m m m O O L O N 'X � � Of O 6 N cg � � rn � Q a nx 9 r D � � �nX W �nx W Lb W �ax it W W J O Kent School District Capital Facilities plan 2016-2019 - 2023-2024 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Apri12018 Kent School District SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2019 - 2023-2024 May 2018 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 2561h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 [SENT 4I_I-I0'01.I C11� � F6CC� BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, President Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President Mr. Ross Hardy, Legislative Representative Ms. Karen DeBruler, Director Ms. Denise Daniels, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Fred Long, Executive Director of Facilities Services Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 Ke.ut School District- Sk-Tear Capital Facilities Plan Ta6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six -Year Planning & Construction Plan — Site Map 17 V I Portable Classrooms 20 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 21 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 26 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 33 X Appendixes 35 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 1 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2018 for the 2018-2019 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee - implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (fte basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to temporarily re -open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and early child education classes for both Kent and Neely -O'Brien Elementary Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re -opened in fall 2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 9 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table Z page 8 and map page 37). The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. (see Page 5) King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1, page 7) 8.19% of 25,032 King County live births in 2012 is projected for 2,050 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2017. This is an increase of 402 live births in King County over the previous year. (See rable2,page 8) Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2017-2022 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. (seemappage37) The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .398 Middle School .096 Senior High .185 Total .679 Multi -Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .029 Total .174 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,757 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix D on Page 37 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. In preparing the 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi -family residences. Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi -family housing units. Within the district's boarders there are several low-income and multi -family housing projects coming on-line during 2017-2018. Once developed and occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi -family housing will likely increase for future Capital Facilities Plan updates. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 6 N o N Cl) o I� p M 00 L'A p N M 0 O M O M 0 N p M LO I- �t 00 N It O 00 N r N Ln o0 L7 c c O p v O O O r N r r m O O O 00 00 c•� 2 c o m N N a0 N N N N N N N r N N N r r N p E v J U 7 CO o o Cl) r- Cl) LO LO Cl) N Ln M LO O O CU a y w w N M m I- r (D (D 0) 0) O LO N N CD c9 co LQr t` No m at c p O O r r r r 0) O O r O 00 1- M i 0 m N N N N N N N N r N N N N r- N `m c n LL O U) T - 6 O N L() �.,� o M O O O a0 V O M U.) w N N fV rn p O Ln �t d' V M (0 I` w LO LO I- O O CO V a, -0 c O M O r O O O O - O M r Na Co C N (n m N N N N N N N •-- N r N N N r N _ _ N 2 J Y — 0 L U O' o L j o O Il- O O (0 O M V' 00 N (0 N r CO >@ wpm, N O m IT 0) N_ 0) I- LO r N O 0) N LO O h o CD CD Co c Z c O M O - O O r O .- O V' fb tO c W m N N 00 N N N N r N N N N N N r r N j a r m 'c J LL a) L6 0 c M J o N o 0) (0 Lo N I- 00 0) (fl () (D M 0) N CL a 2 of v 0 N N M O r Lb LO N 00 O I� V N O Nr I- M LO CO r- m 7 c X > C p LO M 'It O 0) O O O O V O 00 V) v, NCO Y p m N N tb N N N N N N N N N N N U c N N OIds (a La CD NCY) Z o o o � T U @ tT O W Ln Cl) I- �- LO O N co O O V 4 (0 N 0) (o O co LO LO N 0) M () (0 v c c "O U c O co co tO O O O O O O v O 0) (fl (0 c� N m O c rn V m N N 00 N N r N N N N N N N N r N a c Z N O 7 r D O 'Y o Cl) w (O Cl) V' It LO Ln N LO Oo U LU M U N N N (D L W 00 00 00 N I- CO O I- h 0) LL) (p Ln Lp 0 OOL 7 ,O O O LOO N N N N N c m N v (� N N N N p c m J N U U .(Na O O N J Q o 00 o o LO (0 N N (0 (O LO LO (M O 00 O V N N W 'N (O rn M V O V O LO m m m to V' M IT O O c') O O CL Ln 0 O 5 O r 00 O O O m O O V N O (O N >" U �7 7 O= m N N r r r N r N N N N N N N N Lc) � N LO w y T C 0 c G7 U T o V o to O r N t0 I� (7 N 1� CO N O O V% LO N O Cl) Cl) O (O (D I- LO O r r t` r V' , ti r U O r) 7 N c O v M O O O 0) O O O �- V N O I� (D LT u N c cV c m N N p r r r r N N N N N N N N r N c U T J Y 0_ O N O W 0 00 o m 00 I- (fl O N N 00 0) 00 0) 00 t Y m Y O N O V r- O N 00 (0 LO O0 N IT r- V LO V Oo O O r li c O �j N t 0') 0) 0) O O O O r LO N O (0 L) c O 0_ N N N N N N N N N N N N - Wm 06 = @ N CL N LL L) U) U) O O C vl N _ L r V- !U (Nu N N o L lT LU N .�.. m E r N ML1J W d > O` m O m m (`6) "O 2 r o J C p O) w o c c U C (U N d O (V (1 m O II w N m a) __ CO E O C _ U m 2 J w m N r N M d' LO m i-- 00 O` 0 m E 0 0 � rr a) 'c � I1J E o c rn a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) w = m � � c0 a o a a s -a -0o 70 70 -a 6 > 2 o w LI O LT a m m m m m (a m m La m m m o — E •� @ LLI :.. Y Y Y C) U U CD U U CD U U` C7 (7 CD ~ >- U ~ _ N m a U L LL R .Q l9 U m Lu } X_ U) U _N O O L O C Y 7 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Dav Kinderaarten at all Elem LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB Est. 2015 LB Est. 2017 LB Est. 2018 ACTUAL P R O J E C T 1 0 N October 2017 1 2018 12019 2020 11 2021 2022 2023 King County Live Births' 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 26,011 26,011 Increase / Decrease 402 -122 438 139 524 0 0 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.14% 8.17% 8.07% 8.01% 7.84% 7.82% 7.80% FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 2037 2,036 2,046 2,042 2,038 2,034 2,030 Grade 1 2056 2,065 2,081 2,077 2,073 2,069 2,065 Grade 2 2077 2,084 2,068 2,107 2,103 2,098 2,094 Grade 3 2143 2,093 2,116 2,092 2,131 2,127 2,122 Grade 4 2218 2,173 2,208 2,135 2,111 2,150 2,146 Grade 5 2189 2,228 2,230 2,223 2,150 2,126 2,165 Grade 6 2119 2,191 2,219 2,239 2,232 2,159 2,135 Grade 7 1922 2,120 2,104 2,210 2,230 2,223 2,151 Grade 8 2043 1,945 1,964 2,125 2,233 2,253 2,246 Grade 9 2006 2,134 2,236 2,150 2,326 2,445 2,467 Grade 10 2080 2,097 1,966 1,985 1,909 2,065 2,171 Grade 11 1823 1,929 1,620 1,704 1,720 1,655 1,790 Grade 12 1810 1,870 1,594 1,420 1,493 1,507 1,450 Total Enrollment Projection 3 26,523 26,965 26,452 26,509 26,749 26,911 27,032 Yearly Increase/Decrease 3 -6 442 -513 57 240 162 121 Yearly Increase/Decrease % 1.67% -1.90% 0.22% 0.91 % 0.61 % 0.45% Total Enrollment Projection 1 26,523 1 26,965 26,452 26,509 26,749 26,911 27,032 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2018 is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. Live births for King County are estimates for years 2022-2023. 2 Kindergarten projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECSE - Early Childhood Special Education preschoolers 3 Headcount Projections for 2019 - 2023 from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments 4 Oct. 2017 P223 Headcount is 26,523 & FTE 26,113.47. Full Headcount with ECE Preschool & Running Start students = 28,192 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six -year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. April 2018 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 8 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, 8 & C) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1, 2 and 3 for schools that qualify for high poverty funding (14 elementary schools for 2017-18) is planned for an average of 17 or fewer students. The state legislature has provided a one year delay in compliance with the requirement to have class sizes of 17 or smaller for grades K- 3. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 9 English Language Learners (E L L) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students -State Program Reading, Math or Science Labs Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program: Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC) School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASCDD) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 — 8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students. Class size for grades 9 — 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -Media & Technology Labs & Programs Technology Academy at Kent -Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 10 Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate ("IB") Program JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE - Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ., etc. Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Health & Human Services — Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education — Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders). Technical & Industry —Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer -aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture. Kent Phoenix Academy- Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success programs Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,103 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1 %. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2015. For the 2015-2016 school year and beyond the state has a mandated lower class size in 14 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class size in grades K-1, 2 and 3 will be 17 students for every teacher. Compliance with this new state class size requirement has been delayed to the 2019-20 school year. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. Maps of existing schools are included on Pages 14-16. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school opened in fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS SCHOOL Year ABR ADDRESS Opened 2017-18 Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191 st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 497 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 12,848 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent -Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 1 27,103 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tablg 3 April 2018 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report N O O D > A O m > 1 z m m y 5 0 x Z D x � � o x -D _2 F N o p> m z r O N O m m K m y y y N M m Cr m M s N x m D N O p O O O O z O O N m m r. m m y z m C. x r y > =m > x � m m o O m z D zN O y C m x O Z 3 y p m M C1 y N m m N = m m y y D A v> O m D m F z M m m a `< = c x f O m x x m O = O m p s O m y D m x x z o y c m m MC; m y y y N C z N N y 9 O O x O m Z y z y m C7 O O CO x N T m — O m O x x m m m N y y April 19, 2017 14 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report J, Z O 3 3 p m 3 3 0 m y m N z o m m g Q N O m G O z 3 ai 3 m 3 V7 CI)O W - 3 y O LI rri m p vn)�f� ........� N E in v.�,u.Vi w •C ^. D �,•,,..q L _ ' •iJ �Z April 19, 2017 - 15 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report rn M M M CA C) z z z z 0 --I -1 E 1 0 > 7z -1 3 M 0 0 0 M M > U) CI) z Cf) .3 P, C) T, 7 CD P Cj ;7, z April 19, 2017 im V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2017, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority will provide for a replacement for Covington Elementary school (with increased capacity due to growth), a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (site to be determined), twenty additional classrooms throughout the district as well as other infrastructure projects. At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2017, the following projects to increase capacity either are in the planning phase or will start in spring 2017. • Planning is complete for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School in first quarter of 2019. The project will start in spring of 2017 with planned completion in fall 2018.The project is funded with a combination of bond funds (bonds issued in February 2017), state assistance and impact fees. • Planning is in progress for an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley in 2020 or beyond. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. • Planning is in progress to add an additional 20 classrooms to elementary schools. The locations will be determined by need. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table a on Page 18 & Site map on Page 19). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 17 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type I Status Map I ELEMENTARY Map Projected Projected % for Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Replacement construction 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary SE 256th Street & 154th Ave SE Elementary in Progress Fall 2018 630 24% Covington Elem - Capacity to be replaced 9/18 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized -478 Elementary New Elementary School Kent Valley Addition Planning 2020-2021 600 100% Elementary 20 Additional Permanent Classrooms Various schools where needed Addition Planning 2019-2022 480 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time & Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity PortablesTBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2018+ 24-31 each 100% # on y OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use I I Land Use Map Designation Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary King County 12 South Central site (Yeh-Wms) SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD King County Notes: ' TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2018 18 � Gil eon � s E§ -RE 0 cr !! k§!§ © & 33� ° R,A ! D �k � � J | 4 � ��_ ` % 2 2 � Rae eDISVI cts #CaptiFac A#P�n q=_mm 2{ ,!SE � j k ) ;_mm 0� Me 19 this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015. The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. V I Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A, a, c ) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class size, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six -year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school -age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 20 interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (see Tables 5 & 5 A-B-C on pages 22-25). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both fte and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2017 was 26,523 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2017 totals 28,192, which include ECSE and college -only Running Start students. In October 2017, there were 1,118 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Five hundred ninety-three of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. (see Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 22-25). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020-21 1 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity27,103 Changes to Permanent Capacity Capacity Increase (F) Replacement school with projected increase in capacity: Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2 To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity New Elementary School in Kent Valley3 Additional Permanent Classrooms 27,103 27,103 27,103 27,323 27,443 630 -478 600 120 120 120 120 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,103 27,103 27,375 27,223 28,043 27,563 Interim Portable Capacity 4 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 28,759 1 28,831 1 28,815 1 28,471 1 28,499 27,899 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION e 26,523 1 26,965 1 26,452 1 26,509 1 26,749 26,911 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY' 2,236 1 1,866 1 2,363 1 1,962 1 1,750 1 988 t Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site. 3 New Elementary School on site in Kent Valley to be determined. 4 2016-17 total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes. 5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 6 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. April 2018 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 `l0: KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 1 2018-19 2 119-20 1 2020-21 1 2021-22 1 2022-23 2023-24 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity' 13,244 Changes to Elementary Capacity Covington Elementary Replacement (U) 3 Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity New Elementary School in Kent Valley Additional Permanent Classrooms4 13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 630 -478 600 120 120 120 120 120 Subtotal 13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 14,596 Portable Capacity Required' 1656 1728 1440 1248 456 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 112 14,900 14,972 14,956 14,884 14,812 14,812 1 14,932 Adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 5 14,910 14,968 14,915 14,838 14,763 14,757 1 14,757 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 -10 4 41 46 49 55 1 175 Number of Portables Required 69 72 60 52 19 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program serving students in Grades 3 - 12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. 3 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site. 4 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2018 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020-21 1 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 lNo Changes to Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 51148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 1 3.986 4.068 4.335 4.463 4.476 4.397 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,162 1,080 813 685 672 751 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program & 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Eni 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in F Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2018 24 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 1 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020-21 1 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 No Changes to High School Capacity Subtotal b,11 1 b,111 t5, 111 b, / "I "I b, / "I "I b, / "I "I Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY' 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 I 7,536 7,416 7,259 7,448 7,672 7,878 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,175 1,295 1,452 1,263 1,039 833 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program & 2 Kent Phoenix Academy opened in Fall 2007 serving grades 9 - 12 with four special programs. 3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2018 25 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2017-2018 through 2022-2023. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan calls for the replacement of Covington Elementary in 2018-19 which will increase the capacity of the current school by approximately 20%. Some impact fees will be utilized as part of the finance plan. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley and the siting will be determined at a later date. The district does have two sites where the school could be placed and a decision has not been made. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 600 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. To address overcrowding at our elementary schools, the plan also includes twenty additional permanent classrooms at the schools of the greatest need. A decision as to the placing of these classrooms has not been made. These classrooms will be at the schools with the most overcrowding. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which will fund the replacement of Covington Elementary as well as other infrastructure projects. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 27-28 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 26 V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009) $26,700,000 Projected cost - Covington Elementary Replacement (Projected to open in 2018) $46,077,470 Projected cost of New Elementary School Kent Valley (Projected to open in 2020) $46,000,000 20 Additional permanent Classrooms $16,829,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 29 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 31 and 32 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.6%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 27 LO It O Z Z J �a U_ Q' I- 0 O O x U U) I— Z w Y O O O O O O o O O o LO LO O o O o r � O O 'cY LO t0 r- to Cli E _ v3 N - LL LL 6% V) (i) to O O a U N a O O O O UJ O O `o E O O O O C: N c d CO CD � m w W It v3 v v3 rn O a m r` CD2 co v_ O m U ^ LO V- m a) m L) n O ri LO O M 69 2 fR J 6q ffi O O O O O O C J Vi O O n N Q r- o o rn oo LO F r O O O O N W LO N t0 EA tf) Ef? fA m cq N O E O H9 7 N U) N m m O LO O N LO O cq O CD N ~O 0 uj N '- N .... C d3 'IT N O EA N y N Q) U O O LO CD a_ o w O Nrl- toN N O N o a)O O N O CD N C, No E U co N ( c cn a w E o E a m CD O LO @ 0 T E N O OO -00 O W O r a O N 'N N O O o m M r CD (n N N 'Cc: w a N Y V M a r 'U „O. O m fi> W M LO m c O a)N b9 LL .0 a C O f0 E 2 T m m 0 0 I- 7 LO N O y O N O � o ",= N C E N c - N W h r O .) O U `p N O N N o V. U CD p •0 CO V a C O• O 7 ER b9 C 2 C N 0 7 U N j LL L N m r LL LL LL c o a o U N O E O j O E N U) " E O 3 N co C w �C N N N EO N 'C... w v O 01 C U) W H N - U O p M a m > N > U a N F J m i m O N m J cn N O N 0 0) C O N J U N cu C .{i m N U U N l] G w U m a Q LL m c U m Q m Q to c m a� N m Q ani Y O .N o Ll o 0_ w (B N a Z O N H Z O ~ II Q N N E O L 0 O 7 QO c cn Q E m m U U a)L, E O N (n Ll _ =p N U N a0 N W m C w U) N @ W Q CO a: C L1 W N C C N E Z. C O a C LL m LI H a)'U N N CD W N _0 N H m FL- LL O LL 3 E Q LL O N V N UZ Z U Z W N z m H fn N cU m LL W Q m U `m } Ln n O O C U Cn C Y 28 Ln T- S O Z 0 s U U F- to 0 0 O ` J UN ri O'Sz Q cr V ( U Q Z a W Y � U a 0 a U d ('') d d m co rn ° OD 00 �' � a m Y � U Y Q O co to N a 64 E 69 a 64 = G N LO w LO rn r` m 0 N O O O 00 Cfl Q .-- M CO M 00 L() U w p_ I-- Cl) N 000 N 0 ~ _O N 69- 69 69 69- O U 01 a co 0 O O O CO CO O O 0 M O L.n CO CO O O N v O Cn CA O 14 00 00 O O y M p. LO � Cl) O Co 't It O O o r• N 00 It U) co 0 d' d' r• U It CA O Cl) 00 00 00 CO M O O U r• 0 ell 6q M M N .- 69 64 63 64 6) m ami U r• 61 a m O O O 0 V) Cl) M r• r• m 0 CV Q W CDcoN r• 0 0 H O CV •- CO m m m 0 N O O O W o w U)U) a a co U) U) o U o L... U)d U) U)c .co C O Z Y 0 O a) co N 0 Co L N 2 c Y c U O m CA U o O m N c o J co Y m > co N w (D co N L N m U N w w c w U) r U) a) Y N m (n O 0 w 10 co 0 N 0 N 't Cl r O (n N 'O a) O O { cn 00 (O N N m 7 N m l0 0) m L O O O O O O °6 2m O O O O O) N N N N N N a m tL o O L tL N O O a L_ C m N O) o y m _ 0 `m co CO U)E r CD m O N '� o c a) IL w yE U)i o(5 co 0 0 oQ m U C m (O _ Q cT U N O .2 Q O L m 0 o E N Y O 0 a .6 m N m W U) C CD Y cu O 00 (D Q U) d `° o m n C > a \ .0 O 0'S �, m � U 0 m N � 'o co - _ C Q a) `a m L m a) CO r (6 N (n L m � 0 t!U N N = w � d c0 3 0 U m m m 0 n Z 'C o E r` _ o 0 c �' D m 0 a) Uj N 0 > O m a) a> N (n N Y Cl) V U) aa) L) o. o Y m m J m _ Y ca CoCn o p m m J J J m Uj Y 3 0 0- E o a N c a`mi p) = En a� c > U 2 m L N N N o N O N a) a) a) a) tL C a C W C a O O C CA Y C 5 _ a o U in C in U) in C U) C Q �t3 m fl o 9 U a) m m m a T� o Z E _ � co O N .n a cu LL :co w Q m U `m a) U) U N O O Cl) Y 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.398 Elementary 0.117 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.096 Middle School 0.028 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.185 Senior High 0.029 Total 0.679 Total 0.174 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 2,516 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $109,967 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $686,883 Senior High $524,564 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary * $46,077,470 Middle School $0 Senior High * $0 " See cost basis on Pg. 26 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 142,980 Middle School 10,736 Senior High 22,192 Total 5.1% 175,908 Permanent Facility Square Footage Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $125,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $0 State Funding Assistance Credit District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96% Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. (Effective July 2016) $213.23 Elementary (Includes KMVA) 1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,110,415 Single Family Residence $328,047 Total 94.9% 3,241,862 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,613,523 Middle School 671,640 Senior High 1,132,607 Total 3,417,770 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $143,332 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.03 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% CPI Inflation Factor 2.60% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 30 April 2018 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $109,967 630 0.398 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.070 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.138 0.606 A Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) $764.19 $0 $0 $764.19 Construction Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio I B 1 (Elementary) $46,077,470 630 0.398 0.903 $26,285.66 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0.096 0.984 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.185 0.998 $0 0.679 B $26,285.66 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $125,000 24 0.398 0.097 $201.07 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.070 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.138 0.02 $0 0.606 C $201.07 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I Assistance % I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $225.97 90 0.5696 0.398 $4,610.48 D 2 (Middle School) $225.97 117 0 0.096 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $225.97 130 0 0.185 $0 D $4,610.48 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $366,437 Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $2,220.95 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $764.19 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $26,285.66 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $201.07 Subtotal $27,250.92 D = State Match Credit per Residence $4,610.48 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,220.95 Subtotal - $6,831.44 Total Unfunded Need $20,419.48 50% Developer Fee Obligation $10,210 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation) (4,813) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,397 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor I Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $109,967 630 0.117 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.028 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.029 0.174 A Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) $224.65 $0 $0 $114.ti5 Construction Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio I B 1 (Elementary) $46,077,470 630 0.117 0.903 $7,727.19 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.028 0.984 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.029 0.998 $0 0.174 B $7,727.19 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $125,000 24 0.117 0.097 $59.11 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.029 0.02 $0 0.174 C $59.11 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft. / Student I Equalization % I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $225.97 90 0.5696 0.117 $1,355.34 D 2 (Middle School) $225.97 117 0 0.022 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $225.97 130 0 0.039 $0 D $1,355.34 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $143,332 Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,156.85 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $224.65 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $7,727.19 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59.11 Subtotal $8,010.95 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $1,355.34 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,156.85 Subtotal $2,512.19 Total Unfunded Need $5,498.76 50% Developer Fee Obligation $2,749 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation) ($412) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi -family $2,279 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 32 April 2018 IX Summary of Changes to June 2018 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the May 2018 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six -year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2018 will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area in. For 2017, the increase was 3.1 %. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $162 to $5,397. The impact fee for multi -family units will increase by $69 to $2,279. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 33 Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM I Grade/Type FROM TO I Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.257 0.398 Single Family (SF) MS 0.070 0.096 SH 0.138 0.185 Total 0.465 0.679 0.214Increase Student Generation Factor Elem 0.111 0.117 Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.022 0.028 SH 0.039 0.029 Total 0.172 0.174 0.002Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State Match") 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $213.23 $225.97 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $307,784 $366.437 Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $123,109 $143,332 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.398 $1.0269 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.27% 3.95% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,235 $5,397 Increase of $162 or 3.1% Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $2,210 $2,279 Increase of $69 or 3.1 % Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 34 CD N W U) J da o w z p F— '- U p O F- J Z pw o> SZ U , N }} F— I— W U Y a a a ci _ > O a c m 00 c o ID N v E � = O O N C r N W IL (D W C N N LL E M O N O C a W 0 _T d U R W o O. R m U N E a O a O N N R (a (a0 c� a E R N O a` 0 n E a ro O n N Q. R U m E w U 0 U d m CL 0 U a U a w L) m U m 0 () T N co N _rn C' Lm = R m v U N � N fa a `o U E O O O y R Z a U m m Q Y J z 0 w = Y w (f W z} z z I } a z} I %' z z 71 >. �. z}> I z i. >. i. I i. %' z z l r } %- z z O M m M N W M W m n to O n N n w O O M O O M m n a a m V m m n w V m N w m O N O m N O m w O V m N n M N m u) O m a N N V N � V ,0 v M N V V V •f U7 N V O N m N t0 w N v V V m M N to— m O O U] O O O O m O O m O O u) O O O O O O w O M O M M O N O m O O O N O o O O m O O N w O N O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O uj m m M w m V m N u7 m w M w m O w w n m _n O m m O A O m n w w O N V m M M m w n m N N m N m 00 t0 M m a a4 N N V N n m V N u] w v M N V V V V m N V w N m w m w w 7 V V W M W m r v V V m N V V w V m w tD w N v V O w N m w w m m V O N N V n N N V' N O N V V O O m V n N a N n v O tr0 v m v O O r r N M r r N r O r N N O O V N M r W 10 N M N O n N It N O O N N MI v N N MI r N r Cl) V O N M VI V N '7 'V'I M r r OI IO N M CO O I Onl a m N O m m m n O w m n n m M m M M m n V N n m v N w n m N N w w n m w I-w n m M m n w n rn n n V N O m m n n m m N F V M V V V V M V v V V M V M V v a V V a a a a V V st 0 M M V M rj < r i O O V O O O O a O O V O O O O V w o of O O v O O o w O O O o O N N N N N V N N w N N N N r w N r m N U i O u) m u) V N N M N a V N I- M O n M W M M W W Ih V r N 10 a s N M N r u C P C V m o o v V m m o a m n n m m m o M m n O O V.- v w n M w I-w N h n o n n n w a w n M m m A V M V V v V M st et V V M v V M V a M V a s a a a V V M M M V M N C U U C 4 m N ON m ON n w m m 2 O a m n oN 0N m c' r r N r r N N r N r N N N N N r r N r � a 2 U> 03: x n. 3 w w w c) Iu >> (n w J o J o �- 3 3 x U m m> Y x J rL Cr cL Z M m a m m N to to w gIc 3 F U c E E E c Cc 6 y al J W T @ u F E E Q tQ O( .0 N F L N T Y R N C w ul 7 'D E w 0 0 '6 'O Y N Z' I N N K 0 N D N T m t' N N R O0 N CO ~ T N U N R 0 N 3 C ? m J ` 00 x :'. C j - 'a V J O ` aa)i OI 3 2 R O O) 02 N O C w > Y C O 'O R C a, m O F- N U U m N E 'O C 'j y N C O y C R O >` � O C 74 N O R O NN d C Cd . C (y UR U U w u_ 0 0 _ Y Y 3 m m �U E z a a a T (n U) (n U) U Y � t.m 35 I- Z w J J O ix Z W F- Z n O U 0 a W C m w F- I]- w U Q.' W O N O E E UO O O N C = w m w c o H u N LL E M O O N C a w Y Cd M U 43 Co m O O N c0 � U m E In O N 0 (D U) t:f m O v a E a` ) (6 IU .0 p) N (D 0 = tf a 0 E w 16 O O N o n N 0- ° M M m r m m m (D M O m N V (D (D M ID M O M N (OO V C::, O "t ON O N (V N m r U-)m O O (D m O O N V ,lVO m (D 0IO c0 (D O O O N � O I co O O O - N O I co N V O 'V O O I O U o It, I'- m co N co N m CO m N w O r N r m m N M N ,D W CO X E -2:� " 0 m m m N j O' v IO co If) (NO Z Q 0 cm o t` N m V m V LLI cn 0- Um d a U E E E Q 4' m N (1 N M I!7 v V' n cn a v 0 LU T N CL w t` m (D IO m )O O m U \ � a w w U co (D co LO LO N co o_ p m T N u O j C)N IT 0) T CO CO cCp m N r LO I- CD (D (D W U U (6 m In O E C) '7 m (D M m CO (n M N N N M M U co U 0 Z 0 U O O O O L _N O L U U 0 LU O L (Li 1 I N U o (j U m a Y U a a N o (D o m 3 z lc U a a):o � U 2 Z 2 (n _ c, C C C r O O p N 7 O E O m O O co r N CO O M m m @ 7 I y m ,UO m V O O m N O t` O) U N IO O N C N •-- '� w 2 w c 0 N 7 O w O (O O N L U O CDff N LL (fl v O co cD 00O - C, a') "O t` M O (� O (`� It (D O N (D O C, r U 7 CO N m M O - - O N O V T U N L j -- (V r Lx (p w N m Z U (If (U C) N m n0 co00 Lo p M M O O Ib LO 1n Ci @ U m E In O cn w In w OD O N (D O W fn f6 D tf O v o_ E m O N c- O N v O a` 7 'OC 0 a r E N w � E N Cl) O O) U (O = 7 O m if m t` N (O w Q h O O 0 CL (O _ n .- .- N N a) (U V Z co U N N d U � U o X o E w .N co m m co 0 0 r O N r- Lr CL Z C D O_ O (0 o N CO V' V W N w (n a U m = 0., (n Q (D 0) € C-4 (D oo o E (D (n CL d N N O (D 00 U o C w W � r- f- co (0 N 00 O a) � � m w m m LO n U m � (U m a J Ncli ce)w r _ (n U T m L m v CDw N o = M (D co M O 1- If) m (' r N O O C) c p_ N 7 V V r (O (0 (D m N N e- - (n CD N U) U @ O E Q CN (n rn (D LO 00 (O (O CD O (O (y3 Z M N m U rn (u l Y Y Y Y C d w _m 2 (7 o rn L rn = J O c _m 1: `o_ o (n I O CO C: m aY ) a w (D U U IU N Y IT 00 m 0 C C C C Y Y Y Y T Q) E N J U < Q c°)i O X L .0 7 Q O 2 L C a O `o c Y w N N r O w E LL U C 0 od m C a C LL Q N o d N C O 4% CL T Q c N Q `m CL 4- V) 0 0 O 0 CL p C M 1 N < 76 (14 cn 3 N (L 1 N U + 7 _ ) o Ca O o c i 1'c ° 1 j O O N A U 7 3 f° LL, o i N LL T �T LL - ( S U C m O O L c6 Q) N 3 U 'C - Z ( O CL C` 3 v E i n U) O1 n U o E i cn w 0 a a) LL m :Q N U c0 } in U m 0 0 O L U T C N Y 36 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report M-191, St Renton Riverton Heights l7q-yi3ly 51e Tukwila-S't; `- x Maplewood >� Elliott m % S _ - f Renton taalc +i. McMickon - - C. Heights fn ldcVan Cedar Nountain 0, y S t f o Orltlfa ' 1eO' � "�%i L•:kt• R:f •F.Arh St Seatac sl -- :^fill: St '� r 167.' e - .• c SE 2080. S_ S z1211t st = O Brien S 22511: St Midway _` r 9 Kent •1 P y 416 Star Lako L' �W, 11. Sl.4e.,w�gi INlI Thom s Meredith 'v •�n _ 2Hti11, 5t _ 3*1"S: >l:•: a •r. - Christopher - 3E 30•1u. St Lea HIII _ - SE 31211, St Sialr. St Auburn y. J 1511• St SVJ tw 1 1J 'r �1pA r �fn :4ay S SC itit Apartment Multi -family attached Single family detached District ApdI 19, 2017 tiF 2560, St a,'• 169• ' In` Cedar Grove G-"'ram f a' SE 22::1+ S: s r SF- 2'9th,51— Meridian r •; Heights c Covington SF 2a2nrl St Maple Vall Wilderness 1 Village W- SE 172::r. St n Barrydale to e t^4+a:nopr: gA O y' Green River SE Grn. v 0 -1 2 3 4 WWONWIMM Miles N r.. Cherokee Bay Park ;Easall, st 37 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Lynn Desmarais, President Gloria Hodge, Vice President Dr. Avanti Berquist Alisa Louie Pam Teal Dr. Damien Pattenaude, Superintendent AAJ May 2018 enton SLH4oL oasYFEIct i#�YICF EXCIELL9711CF I F94JIF7 Approved by the Renton School District Board of Directors on June 6, 2018 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................... 1 II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY .................................. 5 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES ................... 9 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ............................... 13 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS .................... 15 VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN .................................. 17 VII. IMPACT FEES ............................................. 19 VIII. APPENDICES ............................................. 23 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") was prepared by Renton School District (the "District") in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. It is the District's intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton as a sub -element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington's growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land -use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City's Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the District's student population over the next six years; 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those students based on the District's current Standard of Service; 3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities; 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub - element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District is currently engaged in - 1 - 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. Enrollment Projections: Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), as adjusted by Renton School District, indicate a moderate overall increase in K-12 enrollment of 2.9% over the next six years. While there is a 10.8% increase at the high school level over this period of time, the projections show a decrease of 2.2% at grades K- 5, with an increase of 4.5% at the middle schools. The total net increase in student enrollment over the next six years is projected to be 448 students. A 2015 independent study of enrollment trends and projections prepared by Educational Data Solutions for Renton School District, reports less conservative outcomes. Taking into account King County birth rates, population growth and housing starts, K — 12 student enrollment over the next six years is projected to increase by as much as 2,560 on the high end, to as few as 1,203 on the low end, with a recommended projection of 1,851 additional students. For the purposes of this Capital Facilities Plan we used the more conservative projections based on OSPI's cohort survival method. Current Capacity: Student capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,302. Based on current enrollment (October 1, 2017 headcount), the District is showing a permanent facility deficit of 1,244 at the elementary level. While the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School this fall will greatly reduce that number, the remaining deficit will still equal the capacity of one elementary school. With the opening of Risdon Middle School this school year, middle school capacity now exceeds current student enrollment, but only by a margin of 50, while high school capacity continues to exceed enrollment, with an excess of 222. Elementary school capacity is the District's greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the ever-increasing and fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools now accounting for over 23% of the District's total K — 5 facility capacity. Portables are, however, not considered permanent structures and are not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation and housing students on a temporary basis, until permanent facilities can be constructed. They are not considered a long-term solution. Enrollment Projections and Future Capacity: Based on OSPI's conservative projections, K-12 enrollment growth will be slowing down, with an overall increase of 448 students over the next six years. While high school and middle school enrollment show increases of 464 and 166, respectively, elementary enrollment shows a decrease of 166 students over the same period of time. -2- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 The current high school surplus capacity of 222 will be constantly decreasing until the school year 2022-23, when a deficit of 124 is projected. Similarly, the surplus capacity at the middle school level may become a deficit as soon as the 2018-2019 school year. Options on addressing mitigation of secondary facility deficits will need to be considered, but are not addressed in this Plan. Even with the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School, scheduled for the 2018-19 school year, and the decrease in elementary enrollment foreseen by the enrollment projections, a significant deficit exists, and will continue to exist, at elementary schools. The challenge of adequately housing grades K — 5 is further aggravated by the forthcoming reduction in K-3 class size. Without the addition of any new facilities, we are looking at a 2024 deficit of 1,360, the equivalent of two elementary schools. Capital Construction Plan: For the next six years, one of the District's highest priority will be the construction of new school facilities to accommodate past and projected growth, recognizing and acknowledging the major capacity deficit at the elementary school level. This includes: • Completion of Sartori Elementary School, the District's first urban elementary school, funded by the 2016 Capital Levy, a STEM school, drawing students from throughout the District. • Acquisition of land for future development. • Construction of an additional elementary school, and/or expansion of existing elementary school campuses. • Acquisition of additional relocatable classrooms (portables) and/or the redistribution of existing relocatables, as necessary. Other high priority capital improvements will fall into one or more of the following major categories; Safety and Security, Energy Conservation, Site Improvements, and Building Upgrades. Improvements will occur district -wide, affecting nearly all District facilities, achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy, and nurturing learning environments for all students. Not all of these projects are enrollment driven. The District will also be exploring options for future expansion of its high school facilities. As an alternative to constructing a fourth high school, the feasibility of expanding existing facilities at the Lindbergh High School and Renton High School sites will be considered. Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for capital facilities projects over the next six years include remaining funds from the 2012 bond measure and 2016 capital levy; school impact fees currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton; state funding available through the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction; and, future bond initiatives. -3- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects are over the next six years are $92,300,000, of which approximately 32% are secured by the 2012 Bond and 2016 Capital Levy, Impact Fees, and State Construction Assistance Program. The remaining 68% is unsecured. Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A. One factor contributing to the increase in the multi -family fee while reducing of the single-family fee was the change in the overall student generation factors (SGF). While the SFG for single-family homes increased by a healthy 10.11%, the multi- family GFC jumped 66% above the previous year's factor. A comparison of current and last year's fees is shown below. 2017 2018 Change Single -Family $7,772 $6,877 $ 895 Multi -Family $1,570 $2,455 $885 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY STANDARD OF SERVICE The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (or teaching stations) in calculating facility capacity. The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school -year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid -June. Similarly, the District maintains a fairly traditional daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The District and the Renton Education Association recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 20:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, the student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other -5- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018- 2019 school year, all District high schools will change from the current semester system to a trimester system, initiating the following changes: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 82% to 80%, reducing facility capacity Student/teacher ratios referenced above are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs, operating policy and contractual restrictions. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each room in each facility. For every room housing students, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical six -period day, if classrooms are utilized by staff for planning, then capacity is reduced by 17 percent (one - sixth) of theoretical capacity. Since secondary schools offer a variety of elective courses, it is not practical to assume that these classrooms will reach 100 percent of their maximum capacity, without compromising the curriculum. Another factor that has influenced facility capacity at the elementary school level is the transition from half -day to full -day kindergarten. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, all kindergarten classes throughout the District were extended to full -day. This change alone resulted in a decreased elementary school capacity of 692, the equivalent of more than one entire elementary school. This change was mitigated primarily by providing additional temporary, relocatable classrooms throughout the District, and by converting other specialized educational spaces, such as computer labs, into traditional K-5 classrooms. 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 In addition to full -day kindergarten, reduced student/teacher ratios as prescribed by the McCleary Act will significantly impact building capacity for grades K-3. A recent survey conducted as part of the K-3 Classroom Reduction Grant Program, authorized by SSB 6080 and validated under the auspices of OSPI, indicated that Renton School District will require an additional 42 classrooms to meet the required K-3 student/teacher ratio of 17:1. This Plan assumes that, beginning in 2020, the District Standard of Service will include a K -3 student teacher ratio of 17:1. 7- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES Renton School District's capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use or Non -instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 30 permanent and 55 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 15,453 (October 2016 headcount). The District's permanent K-12 facilities include 14 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and 4 high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the District's early childhood, special education and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,518,466 square feet, with 2,240,456 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. The District's relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students, and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 55 relocatable facilities in the District's inventory, 44 are "double portables" containing two classrooms, and 11 are singles. Combined, they provide the District with a total of 99 relocatable classrooms encompassing 88,720 square feet of additional instructional space. Table 1 below summarizes existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in Appendix B. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Type YP Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Total Permanent 6,384 3,408 4,510 14,302 Relocatable 1,943 552 120 2,615 Total 8,327 3,960 4,630 16,917 Table 2 sox 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA (ft2) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116TH Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 67,533 536 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, WA 98178 49,157 358 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 57,072 356 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 59,164 386 J O Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 66161 597 O Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, WA 98056 60,000 567 vUi Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 54,620 324 Kennydale 1700 NE 28th st., Renton, WA 98056 65,169 648 zLakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, WA 98178 52,958 286 2 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, WA 98059 56,220 456 � Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 65,955 536 w Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98058 53,992 478 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Road, Renton, WA 98055 57,844 480 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, WA 98058 58,758 376 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 824,603 6,384 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98178 109,070 884 J J McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, WA 98056 126,706 872 O p O Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 124,234 791 U Risdon 6928 - 116th Ave SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 136,582 861 F� Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,408 � Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 327,395 1,420 p Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 242,662 1,128 NRenton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, WA 98057 278,373 1,524 = Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, WA 98178 70,831 438 = Total Grades 9-12 Capacity 919,261 4,510 Total Grade Levels K-12 2,240,456 14,302 Meadow Crest ECC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98056 68,752 464 HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 7,005 84 J Z Q Q Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 24,837 48 w J Total Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,341,050 14,898 N Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 21,894 LU u Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, WA 98055 57,000 wLindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 13,600 `" H Nutrition Services/Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton, WA 98057 27,466 O Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 37,213 a Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 20,243 Ln Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,518,466 -10- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 INVENTORY AND POTENTIAL CAPACITY OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS NUMBER OF SCHOOL AREA (sq.ft.) STUDENT BLDG.ID LOCATION CLASSROOMS NO(S). CAPACITY 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 48 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 48 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 48 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 48 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 48 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 24 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 24 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 24 62 Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry 1 2 896 29 64 Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 24 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 24 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 48 73 La keri dge El ementa ry 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 48 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 48 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 48 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5 1,792 48 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 24 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 24 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 24 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,800 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,800 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 48 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1792 48 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 La keri dge El ementa ry 2 7/8 1792 58 100 La keri dge El ementa ry 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 1A/1B 1792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1792 58 113 Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry 2 1A/1 B 1792 58 114 Ta I bot Hi I I El ementa ry 2 2A/2 B 1792 58 Total 99 88,720 2,711 - 11 - 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SITE AREA LOCATION ADDRESS RELOCATABLE FACILITY ID (sq. ft.) CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle 98178 88, 89, 109 5,392 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 • 232 Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 110 1,792 58 Honeydew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 69, 80, 90, 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 Maplewood Heights 130Jericho Ave. SE, Renton 98059 84, 103, 104, 105, 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 Talbot Hill 2300Talbot Rd. S, Renton 98055 62, 64, 70, 113, 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way SE, Renton 98058 92,108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total 60,048 1,943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS D i m m i tt 12320 80th Ave. S, Sea ttl e 98078 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 168 McKnight 1200 Edmonds Ave. NE, Renton 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 192 Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 192 Middle School Total 20,608 552 HIGH SCHOOLS Lindbergh 16426 128th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 120 High School Total 4,480 120 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Spring Glen 2706 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 93,94 3,584 96 Special Education Total 3,584 96 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 88,720 2,711 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site 4.18 acres NW corner S Langston Rd. & 761h Ave. S -12- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Renton School District six -year enrollment projections through the 2023-24 school year are based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to forecast student enrollment projections for a six -year period based on actual student headcounts documented for the previous six years. Enrollment reports prepared by the District are submitted to OSPI on a monthly basis. The District's October 1, 2016 Enrollment Report and OSPI Report No. 1049, dated March 12, 2018, are included in Appendix C. Renton School District six -year enrollment projections, found on the following page, reflect adjustments to OSPI's report based on the following: 1. Report structure has been modified to reflect middle school versus junior high school grade level configuration. 2. Headcount includes only K-12 students attending comprehensive instructional facilities and excludes students attending special education facilities or facilities dedicated to alternative learning experiences. As shown in Table 3 below, current projections indicate a modest overall increase in student enrollment of 2.9% over the next six years. This includes a substantial 10.8% increase in enrollment at the high school level, offset by a 2.2% decrease at the elementary grade levels K — 5. Middle school grade levels 6 — 8 should experience a moderate increase of 4.5% over the same period of time. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH OCT.2017 HEADCOUNT 2023-24 PROJECTION ENROLLMENT INCREASE PERCENT INCREASE ELEMENTARY 7,628 7,462 -166 -2.2 MIDDLE 3,358 3,508 150 4.5 HIGH 4,288 4,752 464 10.8 TOTAL 15,274 15,722 448 2.9 Table 3 -13- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL* (KK Linear Projection) --HEADCOUNT-- AVE. % - - - - PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS ---- Oct. 2017 SURVIVAL 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Kindergarten 1,248 1,262 1,256 1,251 1,245 1,239 1,233 Grade 1 1,278 102.19 1,275 1,290 1,284 1,278 1,272 1,266 Grade 2 1,248 98.95 1,265 1,262 1,276 1,270 1,265 1,259 Grade 3 1,330 98.52 1,230 1,246 1,243 1,257 1,251 1,246 Grade 4 1,297 98.44 1,309 1,210 1,226 1,224 1,238 1,232 Grade 5 1,227 99.05 1,285 1,297 1,199 1,215 1,212 1,226 Total K-5 7,628 7,625 7,561 7,479 7,489 7,477 7,462 Grade 6 1,126 96.81 1,188 1,244 1,255 1,161 1,176 1,174 Grade7 1,134 99.92 1,125 1,187 1,243 1,254 1,160 1,175 Grade 8 1,098 100.01 1,134 1,125 1,187 1,243 1,255 1,160 Total 6-8 3,358 3,447 3,556 3,685 3,658 3,590 3,508 Grade 9 1,086 102.35 1,124 1,161 1,152 1,215 1,272 1,284 Grade 10 1,076 99.70 1,083 1,120 1,157 1,148 1,211 1,268 Grade 11 1,015 91.00 979 985 1,020 1,053 1,045 1,102 Grade 12 1,111 105.01 1,066 1,028 1,035 1,071 1,106 1,097 Total 9 - 12 4,288 4,252 4,295 4,363 4,487 4,634 4,752 Total K-12 15,274 15,324 15,411 15,528 15,634 15,702 15,722 CHANGE 50 87 116 107 68 20 %CHANGE 0.3% 0.6916 0.8910 0.7% 0.4916 0.1% * Information adapted from OSPI Enrollment Projects Report No. 1049, January 13, 2017. Headcount and projections do not include enrollment at Special Use facilities. -14- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS Table 4 compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. At the elementary level, the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in October, 2018, will drastically reduce the current deficit of 1,244 to 506. Beginning in 2020, however, with the implementation of the reduced K-3 teacher/student ratio, the deficit will rise again to 1,377. Even with an overall decrease in elementary enrollment projected over the next six years, the permanent capacity deficit in 2023 is still anticipated to be 1,360. Opening of the new Risdon Middle School in 2017 resulted in a permanent capacity surplus of 50 for grade levels 6-8. By the start of the 2018 school year, however, we expect that surplus to become a deficit of 39, and by 2023, that deficit is anticipated to grow to 100. At the high school level, the District shows a decreasing surplus capacity until 2023, when enrollment finally overtakes capacity, resulting in a deficit of 73. In addition to the current and future projected permanent facility deficits, portable classroom capacity at existing elementary and middle school sites is reaching its maximum. PROJECTED STUDENT CAPACITY 2017-2023 2017 2018 2019 2020' 2021 2022 2023 PERMANENT CAPACITY 6,384 7,119 7,119 6,102 6,102 6,102 6,102 ELEM. STUDENT ENROLLMENT 7,628 7,625 7,561 7,479 7,489 7,477 7,462 K-5 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY3 (1,244) (506) (442) (1,377) (1,387) (1,375) (1,360) PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,408 3,408 3,408 1 3,408 3,408 3,408 1 3,408 MIDDLE STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,358 3,447 3,556 3,685 3,658 3,590 3,508 6-8 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 50 (39) (148) (277) (250) (182) (100) PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,510 4,510 4,510 4,510 4,510 4,510 4,510 HIGH STUDENT ENROLLMENT 1 4,288 1 4,252 1 4,295 1 4,363 1 4,487 1 4,634 1 4,752 6-8 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 222 1 258 1 215 1 147 1 23 1 (124) 1 (242) Table 4 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) 2. Reflects implementation of reduced K-3 class size per 3. Includes Sartori Elementary, which opens September 2018 While the projected deficits at the middle and high school levels may not warrant the construction of new facilities, expansion of existing campuses may be a viable alternative. At the elementary level, even ignoring the reduction of K-3 class sizes, a new elementary school seems eminent. Taking reduced class size into account, additional facilities will most likely be required. Renton School District is currently establishing a Citizen Facilities Advisory Committee whose responsibility it will be to develop recommendations for a long-term capital facilities plan. Integral to this plan will be the prioritization of facility needs to be presented to the Board of Directors for inclusion in a 2019 Bond measure. Among the topics to be addressed -15- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 by the Committee will be enrollment driven needs as supported by this document and other data presented by the District and its consultants, the extent to which portables can be expected to accommodate future growth, and the need to acquire real property for future school construction. The bond measure is scheduled to go before the voters in February 2019. -16- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN Capital facilities capacity improvements identified in this Plan will be funded by a 2016 Capital Levy, remaining funds from a 2012 Bond measure, impact fees assessed and collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, and possible future bond initiatives or other unsecured funding. The District may also be eligible for funding through the OSPI School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP). The District's intent in structuring its capital improvement programs is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period in order to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants. Estimated expenditures for capacity improvement projects over the duration of the Plan are indicated in Table 5 below. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN Capacity Improvement Projects PROJECT Estimated Expenditures) ($1,000s) Funding ($1,000s) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2022-23 Total Secured Unsecured Risdon Middle School 2,500 2,500 2,500 Sartori Elementary 19,500 2,500 22,000 22,000 Elementary No. 16 500 14,000 23,000 9,200 46,700 46,700 Relocatable Classrooms 2,540 1,270 1,270 5,080 2,540 2,540 Land Acquisition 2,670 2,670 2,670 2,670 2,670 2,670 16,020 2,900 13,120 Total 27,210 6,940 17,940 25,670 11,870 2,670 92,300 29,940 62,360 Table 5 1. Estimated expenditures based on tota I project cost inc I uding hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2012 bond and 20161evy monies, previously collected school impact fees, and OSPI SCAP funds. 3. Unsecured funds includeOSPI School Construction Assistance, future school impactfees and future bond initiatives. -17- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 MRIM 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 VII. IMPACT FEES The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King County Code 2 1 A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish "Student Generation Factors" that estimates the number of students generated by each new single or multi- family residential unit constructed, and to establish district -specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix G for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. New Facility Cost Models are provided in Appendix G. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Beginning in 2013, the District introduced a Voluntary District Fee Adjustment component into the prescribed impact fee formula in response to the declining, and then slowly recovering, economy. This was discontinued in 2016 given improved economic conditions, especially within the construction industry. Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21 A, impact fees for the plan year 2018 are: Single -Family Units $ 6,877 Multi -Family Units $ 2,455 Single -Family and Multi -Family Fee Calculation spreadsheets follow. -19- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST Al Elementary 8 650,000 600 0.359 $3,111 A2 Middle 0 650,000 850 0.128 $0 A3 High 0 650,000 1250 0.126 $0 A Total 0.613 $3,111 BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST IN 2018 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST B1 Elementary 93.21% 29,640,000 600 0.382 $17,589 B2 Middle 95.88% 46,499,860 850 0.144 $0 B3 High 99.52% 0 1250 0.149 $0 B Total 96.31% 0.675 $17,589 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST C1 Elementary 6.79% 171,600 29 0.382 $153 C2 Middle 4.12% 171,600 26 0.144 $39 C3 High 0.48% 171,600 26 0.149 $0 C Total 3.69% 0.675 $193 STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT D1 225.97 90 0.3822 0.382 ($2,969) D2 225.97 117 0.3822 0.144 $0 D3 225.97 130 0.3822 0.149 $0 D Total 0.675 ($2,969) TAX CREDIT (TC) AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAV) 427,300 INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.85% TERM (t = MAXIMUM 10) 10 TAX RATE (r) 0.00119417 TC Total ($4,169.82) ($4,170) FACILITY CREDIT $0 TOTAL FEE $13,754 50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $6,877 IMPACT FEE $6,877 * TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r 1+it-I where: NPV = i (I + i)t AAV = Average Assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2017 t = Bond Term -20- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST Al Elementary 8 650,000 600 0.132 $1,144 A2 Middle 0 650,000 850 0.052 $0 A3 High 0 650,000 1250 0.065 $0 A Total 0.249 $1,144 BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST IN 2018 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST B1 Elementary 93.21% 29,640,000 600 0.132 $6,078 B2 Middle 94.59% 46,499,860 850 0.052 $0 B3 High 99.52% 0 1250 0.065 $0 B Total 96.75% 0.249 $6,078 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST C1 Elementary 6.79% 171,600 29 0.132 $53 C2 Middle 5.41% 171,600 26 0.052 $19 C3 High 0.48% 171,600 26 0.065 $0 C Total 3.25% 0.249 $72 STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT COST INDEX SPI SO FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT D1 225.97 90 0.3822 0.132 ($1,026) D2 225.97 117 0.3822 0.052 $0 D3 225.97 130 0.3822 0.065 $0 D Total 0.249 ($1,026) TAX CREDIT (TC) AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAS) 139,108 INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.85% TERM (MAXIMUM 10) 10 TAX RATE (r) 0.00119417 TC Total ($1,357.49) ($1,357) FACILITY CREDIT $0 FEE $4,910 50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $2,455 IMPACT FEE $2,455 1+it-1 * TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = i (1 + i)t AAV = Average Assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2017 t = Bond Term -21 - 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 -22- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 XIII. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS ....................................... 25 APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS...............................27 APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS ...........................29 APPENDIX D: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS .......................31 APPENDIX E: SCHOOL COST MODELS ................................ 33 APPENDIX F: CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN .......................37 -23- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 -24- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY Renton Srhoc I Ulstrict Map Legend . Bellevue M Renton 0 Kefit 0Seatac . icing County Tukwila Newcastre - City Limits of Renton KC U Albbreviations EEarmaorary S PrLdK Schools: $e cwiAsry $ lKmAp: BHE Beoxn Hill EleinPOtary Oh1S Ornmilt piddle $drool BME B yo M&,Ai Elemimlwy FIr#$ Haler, High Sqhaal CES Cascade Elementary !H$ Lud6ergh Hgh $chao- QHE Campbell Hill Eleme-nLary MM$ MdKnrghl Midine $chop HIDE Hon63Gew Bensmary NW Nelsen MdGa �r.hpgl I IES Hazlewood Ekemwmry RH$ Rarem 3egh Schw ALE FlghLands ELemeetary AN'$ Risdon lAdpy $Ghngl KOE 1Gerrnydaia Elermemary TH$ Talley HV $Ghrol LRE Lskandge Elerwnlay MEC #&Ma 3wtiLttEarly Learning MHE Mop"aud heyhis V&wwrlary RAS RenlauAndamy RPE Rdnldu Park Ekrnareary SES. Sancti Elmeantary SHE Slftm Heights Elernenlary THE Talhol Hill Elernnmh5ry TPE TPany dark Elen khiy -25- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A -26- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B =1 4 =1►Ti I =1 ki 11 r_1: &*41: I r &*l F"111 L'7 ASSUMPTIONS StudentlTeacher Ratios: \ Grades K - 1 20:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4 - 5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 SCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL CAP TOT K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP TOT K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP BENSON HILL 31 8 4 3 6 3 7 536 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 536 BRYN MAWR 23 8 4 4 0 1 6 358 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 174 532 CAMPBELL HILL 24 7 4 3 0 4 6 356 8 0 0 1 6 0 1 198 554 CASCADE 28 8 4 4 0 3 9 386 6 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 174 560 HAZELWOOD 30 8 5 4 7 2 4 597 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 58 655 HIGHLANDS 30 9 4 4 7 0 6 567 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 567 HONEY DEW 21 8 1 4 2 0 1 2 5 324 8 0 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 1 222 1 546 KENNYDALE 31 9 4 5 8 2 3 648 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 648 LAKERIDGE 24 6 3 3 0 2 10 286 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 174 460 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 26 11 6 2 0 4 3 456 1 12 1 0 0 4 8 0 0 328 784 RENTON PARK 30 8 4 3 6 3 6 536 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 536 SIERRA HEIGHTS 27 8 4 3 4 3 5 478 8 0 0 1 4 0 3 140 618 TALBOT HILL 25 8 3 1 6 4 3 480 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 72 552 TIFFANY PARK 24 7 4 2 2 3 6 376 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 463 TOTAL 374 113 57 43 46 36 79 6,384 64 0 0 11 47 0 6 1627 1 8011 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY 2020 - 2023 ASSUMPTIONS StudentfTeacher Ratios: \ Grades K - 1 17:1 Grade 2 17:1 Grade 3 17:1 Grades 4 - 5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 SCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL CAP TOT K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP TOT K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP BENSON HILL 31 8 4 3 6 3 7 471 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 BRYN MAWR 23 8 4 4 0 1 6 286 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 174 460 CAMPBELL HILL 24 7 4 3 0 4 6 294 8 0 0 1 6 0 1 191 485 CASCADE 28 8 4 4 0 3 9 314 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 174 488 HAZELWOOD 30 8 1 5 4 7 1 2 4 520 2 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 58 578 HIGHLANDS 30 9 4 4 7 0 6 492 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 492 HONEY DEW 21 8 4 2 0 2 5 266 8 0 0 2 6 0 0 208 474 KENNYDALE 31 9 4 5 8 2 3 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 566 LAKERIDGE 24 6 3 3 0 2 10 232 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 174 406 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 26 11 6 2 0 4 3 379 12 0 0 4 8 0 0 300 679 RENTON PARK 30 8 1 4 3 6 1 3 6 471 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 SIERRA HEIGHTS 27 8 4 3 4 3 5 413 8 0 0 1 4 0 3 133 546 TALBOT HILL 25 8 3 1 6 4 3 434 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 51 485 TIFFANY PARK 24 7 4 2 2 3 6 321 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 408 TOTAL 374 113 57 43 46 36 79 5,459 64 0 0 11 47 0 6 1550 7009 -27- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Ratios Core Classes 29:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 PE 35:1 All Other 31:1 SPED 12:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.95 SCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS I CLASSROOMS RELOCATABLES TOTAL TOTAL GEN. SCI PE DRAMA COMP CTE ART MUSIC SPED OTHER CAP. TOTAL SPEC. USE CAP. CAPACITY DIMMITT 43 19 5 3 0 2 2 1 2 5 4 884 7 0 154 1038 WKNIGHT 43 17 7 4 0 2 2 1 3 4 3 872 8 0 176 1048 NELSEN 53 14 6 4 1 3 3 1 2 9 10 791 8 0 176 968 RISDON 49 18 6 3 1 3 2 1 3 3 9 861 0 0 0 861 TOTAL 139 68 24 14 2 10 9 4 10 21 26 3408 23 0 507 3915 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Ratios Core Classes 29 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 PE 40:1 All Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS/CLASSROOMS RELOCATABLES TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL GENERAL SCI PE DRAMA COMP CTE ART MUSIC SPED OTHER LAV. TOTAL SPEC. USE CAP. CAPACITY HAZEN 77 48 6 5 3 6 4 3 2 9 0 1420 0 0 0 1420 LINDBERGH 59 34 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 0 1128 5 0 104 1232 RENTON 78 44 6 5 6 7 5 3 2 5 0 1524 0 0 0 1524 TALLEY 27 19 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 438 0 0 0 438 TOTAL 241 145 17 15 14 19 13 10 7 20 5 4510 5 0 104 4614 SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Student/Teacher Rations General 24:1 Pre K - 3 17:1 Special Ed. 12:1 Program Efficiency 0.95 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS/CLASSROOMS RELOCATABLES TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL I GENERAL SPEC.ED. Pre K-3 CAPACITY TOTAL SPEC. USE CAPACITY CAPACITY SPRING GLEN 9 2 7 0 132 4 2 72 204 MEADOW CREST 21 0 1 20 352 0 0 0 352 TOTAL 30 2 8 20 484 4 0 72 556 im 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C z p z W ac 4 Wb � iY i'J I'Y TY iY IY rY SO N N Y11 Q Ill r-1 1u�"�yy n ,, • + - i { T+ .--i mar .a rl iy N N I''1 rl c Yiwp u'Y %M 44pp Ow W I� iP1 g In � # v JY +4'F 4 44 ri P` YfY A'F O '+I +Y Fl ri Ip r1 � O -r O -r '8k lyb5 8 � WmI1'�+ �V�Op4 r4+ m m C4 od+ O O O O 4 h 1 � � N 4 IL f�M1 fWYS .rt F 4 ti �u"7 j V4 � �Q Rs ifY T iY M G r'i} T-1 !'T ri Q5 N J s r !J i'hY F4 M N � M � M � A rl rl � Q t• G .rt rl �¢ rl rl � F/ rF rl rl QY � �� -I J S i G ++ N w5 ; yI Yo N d m r+ w Jj I � Ili LA U qw p4 y4 q ww 4 #J 4 yV� 5A� fG yn �p O w MOM 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C Q uD W ry il- r4 c4 r4 �Ln m 75 MN ti r+i eN ry O 4 Q Ch eN ,--i 4 tD p rn ,--i 01 .ppad� ni rol C. r-- SO od U5 ry rw n m OS # M rri m 11 a -- O ry fm *r ey rri ry .y o8 rah +Y # .y ra T tp hk ry r-1 Iti O h r �- c ev a6 4 r-1 ry r� rQ N O Q ry Q ►+ 1 -1 Ch �+ h- u3 -C r 4 ra n*. Gs 87 -r n, Ik iw uA ,-I r- UD 00 rti Z rw 05 6 D Lo -1 M O N ,-1 T h W Q #� � Gti , Oti T-4 - R 71 N rA T h ID S G a v sp c co q u-. rl ri av rw �, ri fn V 'I rtf UN u's r-r US m T ry h Q5 w5 m Q I'+ u'S f4 rw ry Iw u3 a¢ ry m oq v, m rw ti Ln ,--i r "i rl 2 C 2 r-1 r-I r-1 W .. 2 z g�qj tO V_ Y C l.3 H H C 2 [C J -30- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide "student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation." The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, "data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county -wide averages must be used." King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of eleven school districts, including Renton School District. Of those eleven districts, seven districts conduct their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on district records and actual development data. The remaining four districts, including Renton, rely on averages of student factors developed by other districts. In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen to use a county -wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student generation factor surveys as well as those that have similarly relied on county -wide data. The Student Generation Factors in the table below represent an average of the student rates calculated by the other ten school districts. STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS ELEMENTARY MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) SINGLE-FAMILY 0.382 0.144 0.149 0.675 MULTI -FAMILY 0.132 0.052 0.065 0.250 TABLE 6 The table on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan's impact fee calculations. -31- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D COUNTY -WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS DISTRICT SI NGLE-FAMI LY MULTI -FAMILY K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL Auburn 0.193 0.077 0.073 0.343 0.103 0.031 0.044 0.178 Enumclaw 0.345 0.130 0.135 0.610 0.083 0.031 0.033 0.147 Federal Way 0.220 0.120 0.143 0.483 0.597 0.237 0.323 1.157 Fife 0.325 0.136 0.137 0.598 0.127 0.057 0.066 0.250 Highline 0.152 0.026 0.065 0.243 0.093 0.047 0.070 0.210 Issaquah 0.354 0.153 0.148 0.655 0.119 0.063 0.075 0.257 Kent 0.398 0.096 0.185 0.679 0.117 0.028 0.029 0.174 Lake Washington 0.424 0.171 0.119 0.714 0.058 0.019 0.019 0.096 Northshore 0.331 0.108 0.081 0.520 0.036 0.013 0.009 0.058 Riverview 0.345 0.130 0.135 0.610 0.083 0.031 0.033 0.147 Snoqualmie Valley 0.389 0.162 0.134 0.685 0.089 0.041 0.047 0.177 Tahoma 0.345 0.130 0.135 0.610 0.083 0.031 0.033 0.147 TOTAL 3.821 1.439 1.490 6.750 1.588 0.629 0.781 2.998 AVERAGE 0.318 0.120 0.124 0.675 0.132 0.052 0.065 0.250 -32- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E FACILITY COST MODELS Facility cost models are a calculation of the cost to construct educational facilities unique to the District. This is accomplished by utilizing both District specific data as well as information available from OSPI. OSPI constants are factors established by OSPI as part of its School Construction Assistance Program. State Funding Assistance Percentages are unique to individual school districts while the Construction Cost Allocation (per square foot of construction) is constant throughout the state. The State Area Allocation (per student) is used solely by OSPI to determine a District's eligibility for state funding. It is not meant to represent or reflect the unique spatial needs of a District necessary to provide its adopted programs and standard of service. The District Area Allocation utilized in the cost models reflects historical data from previously constructed facilities, or facilities currently under construction, adjusted to reflect current programs, anticipated funding and other topical issues. The applied Cost per Square Foot is an average of recently bid school projects of similar grade levels in the Puget Sound Region, as reported by OSPI. Elementary and Middle School Cost Models follow. -33- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COST MODEL FACILITY INFORMATION Building Site Work Student capacity 600 Area (acres) 8 SF per student 116 Cost per acre $600,000 Generic classrooms 30 Right-of-way LF 2,000 Gym and cafeteria Separate Right-of-way cost per LF $440 Building area (SF) 69,600 Utility improvements $350,000 Cost per SF $325 Demolition Site Preparation Area (SF) 50,000 Area (acres) 8 Cost per SF $15 Cost per acre $30,000 CONSTRUCTION COST Demolition $750,000 Site prep $240,000 Building $22,620,000 Site work $4,800,000 Right-of-way improvements $880,000 Off -site utility improvements $350,000 Subtotal $29,640,000 Cost per SF $426 SOFT COSTS Professional fees 10.0% $2,964,000 Sales tax 10.0% $2,964,000 Change Order Contingency 7.0% $1,830,395 Permits 2.0% $522,970 Special inspections 1.0% $261,485 Art 0.0% $0 Work under separate contract 0.5% $130,743 Temporary Facilities/Moving & Storage 0.5% $130,743 Furniture, fixtures & equipment 8.0% $2,091,880 Project management 2.0% $522,970 District administration 1.5% $392,228 Mitigation 2.0% $522,970 Project contingency 7.0% $2,074,800 51.5% Subtotal $14,409,183 CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS 1 $44,049,183 ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount 2019 2.62% $45,203,271 2020 2.79% $46,464,442 2021 2.74% $47,737,568 2022 2.85% $49,098,089 2023 2.86% $50,502,294 2024 2.89% $51,961,810 Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition -34- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E MIDDLE SCHOOL COST MODEL FACILITY INFORMATION Building Site Work Student capacity 850 Area (acres) 15 SF per student 140 Cost per acre $400,000 Generic classrooms 31 Right-of-way LF 1,000 Building area (SF) 119,000 Right-of-way cost per LF $350 Cost per SF $325 Utility improvements $231,000 Demolition/Abatement Site Preparation Area (SF) 52,924 Area (acres) 15 Cost per SF $15 Cost per acre $30,000 CONSTRUCTION COST Demolition $793,860 Site prep $450,000 Building $38,675,000 Site work $6,000,000 Right-of-way improvements $350,000 Off -site utility improvements $231,000 S u btota 1 $46, 499, 860 Cost per SF $391 SOFT COSTS Professional fees 10.0% $4,649,986 Sales tax 10.0% $4,649,986 Change Order Contingency 7.0% $1,830,395 Permits 2.0% $522,970 Special inspections 1.0% $261,485 Art 0.0% $0 Work by separate contract 1.0% $261,485 Temporary Facilities 0.5% $130,743 Moving and Storage 0.5% $130,743 Furniture, fixtures & equip. 10.0% $2,614,850 Project management 1.0% $261,485 District administration 1.5% $392,228 Mitigation 2.0% $522,970 Project contingency 7.0% $3,254,990 53.5% S u btota 1 $19,484, 315 CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS $65,984,175I ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount 2019 2.62% $67, 712, 960 2020 2.79% $69,602,152 2021 2.74% $71,509,251 2022 2.85% $73,547,264 2023 2.86% $75,650,716 2024 2.89% $77,837,022 Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition -35- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E -36- 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX F CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT STUDENT CAPACITY 2017 2018 CHANGE Elementary 6,172 6,384 212 Middle 2,990 3,408 418 High 4,679 4,510 -169 Tota 1 13,841 14,302 461 ACTUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) 2017 2018 CHANGE Elementary 7,622 7,628 6 Middle 3,216 3,358 142 High 4,279 4,288 9 Tota 1 15,117 15,274 157 IMPACT FEES 2017 2018 CHANGE Single -Family 7,772 6,877 (895) Multi -Family 1,570 2,455 885 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2016 2017 CHANGE Single -Family Elementary 0.359 0.382 0.023 Middle 0.128 0.144 0.016 High 0.126 0.149 0.023 Total 0.613 0.675 0.062 Multi -Family Elementary 0.091 0.132 0.041 Middle 0.027 0.052 1 0.025 High 0.032 0.065 0.033 Total 0.150 0.249 0.099 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2016 2017 CHANGE Land Acquisition/Acre 550,000 650,000 100,000 Temp Bldg Acquisition 171,600 177,000 5400 State Match Percentage 0.3822 0.3822 0 Ave. Assessed Value - Single 375,989 427,300 51,311 Ave. Assessed Value - Multi 123,175 1 139,108 1 15,933 Bond Interest Rate 3.95% 3.85% (0.00) Tax Rate / $1000 2.64198 1.19417 (1.44781) 37 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX F