HomeMy WebLinkAboutScoring Document SE 172nd Street and 125th Avenue SE Green I 2019
Stormwater Infrastructure Design Project: Consultant
Evaluation
NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:
NAME OF RATER:
EVALUATION OF WRITTEN PROPOSAL
Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications/Proposal,and evaluate the following elements/sections based
upon the scoring system described below:
Inadequate= 1,Acceptable=2,Good=3, Excellent=4,Outstanding=5
Multiply points by Weighting Factor(WF)where used (e.g.Good =3 pts x WF of 2=6 Total Pts)
Project Approach
Item Description Nominal Weighting Weighted
Score Factor(WF) Score
1 Proposed Approach,Scope of Work,and Tasks are compatible with City 1
practices(preparation of scope of work,breakdown of project into
tasks and milestones,adequate field and background research,etc.)
2 Proposed tasks appear to meet the needs of project,preliminary scope 2
of work,and the project goals.
3 Preliminary time schedule for the tasks appears to be realistic. 2
Task sequencing is logical,appropriate.
4 Time estimates for key members'work on tasks appear to be realistic 1
and appropriate.
5 Key team members have sufficient and realistic availability for project. 1
6 Is a quality control program included? Do task leads/senior staff 1
perform quality reviews of products?
SUBTOTAL:
Project Management
Item Description Nominal Weighting Weighted
Score Factor(WF) Score
1 Evaluate firm's approach to organize and carry out the work. 1
2 Evaluate organization chart and how team members and sub- 1
consultants will interface with project and project tasks.
SUBTOTAL:
Project Team Members—Qualification and Expertise as Related to the Requirements of this Project
Item Description Nominal Weighting Weighted
Score Factor(WF) Score
1 Experience and technical expertise of proposed Project Manager/task 2
leaders.
2 Experience/expertise of proposed engineers in hydrologic(basin) and 2
hydraulic analysis and design.
3 Experience/expertise of proposed team members in environmental 1
analysis and permitting.
4 Experience/expertise of proposed sub-consultant(s) in their 1
professional areas and in similar projects. (if no sub-consultants
proposed score a 3)
5 How similar to this project are the provided project examples? Did key 1
team members on this project have roles within the example projects?
6 How did the firm perform in terms of budget and schedule on the 1
similar projects provided?Did the projects meet the desired
outcomes?
SUBTOTAL:
Overall Evaluation
Item Description Nominal Weighting Weighted
Score Factor(WF) Score
1 Quality of work by firm/team members on previous City of Renton 1
projects,and knowledge of Renton standards.
(if you know of no previous work for City,score a 2 on this item).
2 Overall evaluation of Proposal and ability of Firm to do the project 2
work.
3 Affirmative action,enter a 2 if the firm is a registered MBE,WBE,or 1
DBE firm,and a 0 if not,or if unknown.
SUBTOTAL:
TOTAL SCORE: