Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutScoring Document Renton Airport Lift Station Replacement Project: ' . �. Consultant Evaluation NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications/Proposal,and evaluate the following elements/sections based upon the scoring system described below: Inadequate= 1,Acceptable=2,Good=3, Excellent=4,Outstanding=5 Multiply points by Weighting Factor(WF)where used (e.g.Good =3 pts x WF of 2=6 Total Pts) Project Approach Item Description Weighting Total Factor Points (WF) 1 Proposed Approach,Scope of Work,and Tasks are compatible with City 1 practices(preparation of scope of work,breakdown of project into tasks and milestones,adequate field and background research,etc.) 2 Proposed tasks appear to meet the needs of project,preliminary scope of 2 work,and the project goals. 3 Preliminary time schedule for the tasks appears to be realistic. 2 Task sequencing is(ogical,appropriate. 4 Time estimates for key member's work on tasks appear to be realistic and 1 appropriate. 5 Is a quality control program included? Do task(eads/senior staff perform 1 quality reviews of products? SUBTOTAL: Project Management Item Description Weighting Total Factor Points (WF) 1 Evaluate firms approach to organize and carry out the work. 1 2 Evaluate organization chart, how team members,sub-consultants will 1 interface with project and project tasks. SUBTOTAL: Project Team Members—Qualification and Expertise as Related to the Requirements of this Project Item Description Weighting Total Factor Points (W F) 1 Experience and technical expertise of proposed Project Manager/task 2 leaders. 2 Experience/expertise of proposed team members in hydrologic(basin) 2 and hydraulic analysis and design. 3 Experience/expertise of proposed team members in environmental 1 analysis and permitting. 4 Time estimates and availability of key team members for the project 1 5 Experience/expertise of proposed sub-consultant(s) in their professional 1 areas and in similar projects. (if no sub-consultants proposed score a 3) 6 Evaluate the similar project examples the firm provided,and how well the 1 firm performed on the similar project examples. 7 How did the firm perform in terms of budget and schedule on the similar 1 projects provided? SUBTOTAL: Overall Evaluation Item Description Weighting Total Factor Points (WF) 1 Quality of work by firm/team members on previous City of Renton 1 projects,and knowledge of Renton standards. (if you know of no previous work for City,score a 2 on this item). 2 Overall evaluation of Proposal and ability of Firm to do the project work. 2 3 Affirmative action,enter a 2 if the firm is a registered MBE,WBE,or DBE 1 firm,and a 0 if not,or if unknown. SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE: