Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conceptual Plan - Subdistrict 1B Boeing Renton Plant Redevelopment (11/7/2005)
November 14,2005 Renton City Council Minutes N.„< Page 398 UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report Committee of the Whole recommending concurrence with the staff recommendation to adopt the Planning: Boeing Subdistrict conceptual plan proposed by The Boeing Company for the potential 1B Conceptual Plan redevelopment of 50.7 acres of Boeing property in the South Lake Washington area known as Subdistrict 1B with the conditions outlined below. The northern 21.2 acres of property is expected to become surplus and brought forward for redevelopment in the immediate future. This property is under a "right of first refusal" agreement with Harvest Partners,the owner and developer of the 46 acres of property formerly owned by Boeing immediately adjacent to this property to the north. Boeing proposes that this initial parcel be developed with as much as 270,000 square feet of retail. The remaining property is expected to be retained by Boeing for five to ten years. However, upon redevelopment,as much as 900,000 square feet of lab and/or office, as well as some additional retail and multi-family housing anticipated to be sold and reoccupied by other companies,could be developed in and around the 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings. To enhance the plan and its consistency with the vision and policies for the Urban Center-North designation adopted in the Comprehensive Plan,the following conditions should be imposed on the conceptual plan: 1)Park Ave. N. be designated as a"pedestrian-oriented street," to ensure an urban form of development and provide pedestrian linkages between the subdistrict and the planned retail/entertainment center expected to be developed to the north,and 2)A transit facility be an allowed use in the immediately available property, if funding for such a facility emerged and it was developed in a way that was supportive of surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s). The envisioned retail and employment center resulting from the redevelopment proposed under the conditioned conceptual plan will have positive economic and social impacts for the City as a whole. As outlined in the 2003 development agreement with Boeing, all subsequent land use applications related to this property will be checked against this document for consistency prior to approval. Pointing out that the committee report pertains only to the conceptual plan, Council President Briere assured that the City will continue to discuss the concerns expressed about the transportation plan for this area. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Councilman Persson announced that the Finance Committee report and Finance: Business License Fee ordinance regarding the business license fee reporting period will be held until Reporting Period November 21st. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 242498-243017 and three wire transfers totaling $3,445,995.68; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 60666-60884, one wire transfer,and 602 direct deposits totaling$2,003,123.98. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. AmPrarrin BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE`" C TY COUN iL COMMITTEE REPORT Date l/-/7{aO.5 November 14, 2005 Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan (Referred October 17, 2005) The Committee of the Whole recommends concurrence with the staff recommendation to adopt the Conceptual Plan proposed by The Boeing Company for the potential redevelopment of 50.7-acres of Boeing property in the South Lake Washington area known as Subdistrict 1 B with the conditions outlined below. The northern 21.2 acres of the property is expected to become surplus and brought forward for redevelopment in the immediate future. This property is under a "right of first refusal" agreement with Harvest Partners, the owner and developer of the 46 acres of property formerly owned by Boeing immediately adjacent to this property to the north. Boeing proposes that this intial parcel be developed with as much as 270,000 square feet of retail. The remaining property is expected to be retained by Boeing for five to 10 years. However, upon redevelopment, as much as 900,000 square feet of lab and/or office, as well as some additional retail and multi-family housing, could be developed in and around the 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings, which are anticipated to be sold and re- occupied by other companies. To enhance the plan and its consistency with the Vision and Policies for the Urban Center North adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, the following conditions should be imposed on the Conceptual Plan: 1) That Park Avenue be designated a "Pedestrian-oriented Street," to ensure an urban form of development and provide pedestrian linkages between the subdistrict and the planned retail/entertainment center expected to be developed to the north, and 2) That a transit facility would be an allowed use in the immediately available property, if funding for such a facility emerged and it could be developed in a way that was supportive of surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s). The envisioned retail and employment center resulting from the redevelopment proposed under the conditioned Conceptual Plan will have positive economic and social impacts for the City as a whole. As outlined in the 2003 Development Agreement with The Boeing Company, all subsequent land use applications related to this property will be checked against this document for consistency prior to approval. f Terri Briere,Ciuncil President cc: Alex Pietsch Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Nancy Weil November 14,2005 vow, Renton City Council Minutes "10' Page 397 museum. Ms. Beckley stressed that the importance of the library to the community should take precedence over any favoritism for the museum. Councilmembers Corman and Clawson assured that the matter will be discussed. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Hassle Free Holiday Bazaar will be held on November 18th and 19th at the Community Center, where a wide variety of handcrafted items will be sold by over 100 vendors. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/7/2005. Council concur. 11/7/2005 EDNSP: 2005 Neighborhood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Grant Program reported submission of grant applications for the 2005 Neighborhood Grant Program(second round) and recommended funding five projects and one newsletter in the total amount of$17,446. Refer to Community Services Committee. Comprehensive Plan: 2006 Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Amendments, Pre- submitted four pre-applications for the 2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applications pre-application review process. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CAG: 04-098,Airport Apron Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-04-098,Airport Apron C C Utilities Conversion, Potelco Utilities Conversion; and requested approval of the project,commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$15,132.89 to Potelco, Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Utility: Renton Village Storm Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a contract in the amount of System Improvement, Gray& $141,039 with Gray&Osborne, Inc. for engineering services for the Renton Osborne Village Storm System Improvement project. Council concur. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Angelina Laulainen, 314 Garden Ave. N., Citizen Comment: Laulainen- Renton, 98055,expressing concern regarding the potential increase in truck North Renton Neighborhood, traffic in the North Renton neighborhood as a result of the development of the Truck Traffic Lakeshore Landing project, and suggesting ways to inform truck drivers of the appropriate truck routes. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY r oe I n 1 PERSSON,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Veeralde14(e /1- l`1 GO.> Reierred io lransptr/cthhn From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk �mm` � To: Angela Laulainen Date: Mon, Nov 7, 2005 8:36 PM Subject: Re: Please read this evening Dear Ms. Laulainen: Thank you for your e-mail to the Renton City Council. Copy has been forwarded to all Councilmembers for review. Since no Council action was taken on this matter at tonight's meeting, and since your email was not entered into the record tonight due to the late receipt and the early meeting, your email correspondence will be placed on the next Council agenda, 11/14. In the meantime, Council has received a copy for their consideration. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Laulainen, Angela" <ALaulainen@Iwsd.org> 11/07/05 3:38 PM >>> I am submitting the email below to be read at the City Council meeting this afternoon. I am unable to attend for the audience comment portion so request that this email be read at tonight's meeting: Dear City Council Members and those persons involved in the Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan and the Lakeshore Landing Development, My name is Angela Laulainen. I reside at 314 Garden Avenue North in the North Renton Neighborhood and I am sending this letter in regards to the development of the Lakeshore Landing. My neighborhood is in a residential area which is surrounded on all sides by commercial activity. Being such,we are a walking community and enjoy our close proximity to the park, the community center, the river, and look forward to being able to walk to Lakeshore Landing when it is completed. As a neighborhood with lots of young families and people who like to walk, we are very aware of traffic issues and any large vehicle traffic that comes through. Most of the streets in the North Renton Neighborhood are actually not truck routes (not for vehicles over 26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight). In order to preserve the residential nature of our neighborhood, we have made great efforts, working with the City of Renton and Officer Goodman of the Renton Police Department, to get information out to current business in our neighborhood regarding which streets are truck routes and which are not. As citizens, we take time to monitor truck traffic, contact businesses, and get out the truck route information to them. We often observe oversize vehicles on N. 3rd Street, N. 4th Street, and on Garden Avenue which are all residential streets and not truck routes. Because of our efforts, over the past year the large vehicle traffic on these streets has been has been greatly reduced. I would like to request that City Council and the Lakeshore Landing Developers take some simple steps to prevent a sudden impact of large vehicle traffic on our North Renton Neighborhood streets due to construction and the new businesses going in at Lakeshore Landing. Here are some specific suggestions: 4 . 1) Distribute the truck route map to all of the construction companies involved in this development. This may sound like it can't be done but the Kenworth Truck Company,for example, has been emailing the truck routes out to all of their distributors in order to help with this problem 2) Put up signage to direct traffic to Lakeshore Landing. This would be especially helpful at Bronson Way to show that traffic can easily get to Lakeshore Landing by taking the"House Way Bypass"rather than going West on 4th . This suggestion actually was brought up at the last meeting regarding truck traffic in the North Renton Neighborhood. 3) Provide new businesses that go in at Lakeshore Landing with the truck route map and have these businesses pass it on to their suppliers/distributors. Without these preventative steps, we will surely see many large vehicles drive through on our neighborhood streets because they are unfamiliar with the area and the proper truck routes. This is a real problem that can be easily avoided. As an example, when the demolition of Boeing Subdistrict 1 B was taking place, the big Rhine demolition trucks drove down N. 3rd Street until they were given the truck route information. It is just a matter of getting the truck route information to the people who drive these large vehicles. Thank you for taking the time to consider my suggestions. Sincerely, Angela Laulainen 314 Garden Avenue North Renton, WA 98055 (425)227-7905 mie From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Angela Laulainen Date: Tue, Nov 15, 2005 8:43 AM Subject: RE: Please read this evening Dear Ms. Laulainen: At the regular Council meeting of 11/14/2005, the Renton City Council referred your email messages to the Transportation Committee for further review. You will be notified when the Committee will meet on this matter. If I can provide further information or assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>>"Laulainen, Angela"<ALaulainen@lwsd.org> 11/13/05 12:56 AM >>> Thank you for forwarding my email to all the City Council Members. Since they have all received a copy, the email doesn't need to be read out at the Council Meeting, but I do have another idea that I would appreciate be forwarded also to the Council. Would it be possible to create some kind of liaison panel for this project in order to keep the North Renton residents up to date on the development of the Lakeshore Landing and Boeing Subdistrict 1 B? There is currently a liaison panel in place for the 1-405 improvements that this could be modeled after. A liaison panel could include citizens from the North Renton Neighborhood who are specifically interested in the development of the area. Input from a liaison panel could be invaluable & could provide insight& ideas from the perspective of those living right next door to the development. We could often offer simple suggestions, such as placement of signage for example, which others unfamiliar with the neighborhood may not think of. We are a very positive group with lots of creative solutions. Gregg Zimmerman has worked with some of the North Renton neighbors over the past year on reducing the overweight truck traffic and this proved to be a very successful cooperative effort. I hope we could help in a similar way with this project. Thank you for considering my ideas and thank you for taking extra time to discuss the changes in Logan Avenue. It is wonderful to have a City Council that really understands and responds to the concerns of their citizens. Sincerely, Angela Laulainen 314 Garden AVE N Renton, WA 98055 (425)227-7905 From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk jmailto:Councilna,ci.renton.wa.usl Sent: Mon 11/7/2005 8:36 PM 4410, To: Laulainen,Angela Subject: Re: Please read this evening Dear Ms. Laulainen: Thank you for your e-mail to the Renton City Council. Copy has been forwarded to all Councilmembers for review. Since no Council action was taken on this matter at tonight's meeting, and since your email was not entered into the record tonight due to the late receipt and the early meeting, your email correspondence will be placed on the next Council agenda, 11/14. In the meantime, Council has received a copy for their consideration. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Laulainen,Angela" <ALaulainenelwsd.orq> 11/07/05 3:38 PM >>> I am submitting the email below to be read at the City Council meeting this afternoon. I am unable to attend for the audience comment portion so request that this email be read at tonight's meeting: Dear City Council Members and those persons involved in the Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan and the Lakeshore Landing Development, My name is Angela Laulainen. I reside at 314 Garden Avenue North in the North Renton Neighborhood and I am sending this letter in regards to the development of the Lakeshore Landing. My neighborhood is in a residential area which is surrounded on all sides by commercial activity. Being such, we are a walking community and enjoy our close proximity to the park, the community center, the river, and look forward to being able to walk to Lakeshore Landing when it is completed. As a neighborhood with lots of young families and people who like to walk, we are very aware of traffic issues and any large vehicle traffic that comes through. Most of the streets in the North Renton Neighborhood are actually not truck routes (not for vehicles over 26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight). In order to preserve the residential nature of our neighborhood, we have made great efforts, working with the City of Renton and Officer Goodman of the Renton Police Department, to get information out to current business in our neighborhood regarding which streets are truck routes and which are not. As citizens,we take time to monitor truck traffic, contact businesses, and get out the truck route information to them. We often observe oversize vehicles on N. 3rd Street, N. 4th Street, and on Garden Avenue which are all residential streets and not truck routes. Because of our efforts, over the past year the large vehicle traffic on these streets has been has been greatly reduced. I would like to request that City Council and the Lakeshore Landing Developers take some simple steps to prevent a sudden impact of large vehicle traffic on our North Renton Neighborhood streets due to construction and the new businesses going in at Lakeshore Landing. Here are some specific suggestions: 1) Distribute the truck route map to all of the construction companies involved in this development. This may sound like it can't be done but the Kenworth Truck Company, for example, has been emailing the truck routes out to all of their distributors in order to help with this problem 2) Put up signage to direct traffic to Lakeshore Landing. This would be especially helpful at Bronson Way to show that traffic can easily get to Lakeshore Landing by taking the"House Way Bypass"rather than going West on 4th . This suggestion actually was brought up at the last meeting regarding truck traffic in the North Renton Neighborhood. 3) Provide new businesses that go in at Lakeshore Landing with the truck route map and have these businesses pass it on to their suppliers/distributors. Without these preventative steps, we will surely see many large vehicles drive through on our neighborhood streets because they are unfamiliar with the area and the proper truck routes. This is a real problem that can be easily avoided. As an example, when the demolition of Boeing Subdistrict 1 B was taking place, the big Rhine demolition trucks drove down N. 3rd Street until they were given the truck route information. It is just a matter of getting the truck route information to the people who drive these large vehicles. Thank you for taking the time to consider my suggestions. Sincerely, Angela Laulainen 314 Garden Avenue North Renton, WA 98055 (425)227-7905 Z�+ 3y'. O ' bA^d 3 . > . • • . t-, E Z w iO C aq' rd b. o .�-- yaov . o > o � tlA � �ycp► Co d d o ow~ i oa�� A• •^G � �,p o . _, za [a `Vof . u m oxu ; U 3. N.oZ q krz6• '"o a) O W g.o C Oo g R co 0. p C� D a) 0. i'"IIflhji1 !H1H ,11 Ec8 $6 ,-i ra q > , „ o 2^O O'a cRs," y " o cd d 2 ,ate•,,U2 , y0 y0y " O'C 0..., C ti U] 0 H'O. C o 0.u Ri.c O.�, p y>.;� frH d'3: mo~OO4..., ,. a)a' ° 0 ..) gO O.ti.p y-' �..' E a) o �o0c.) 0 0 0 big')C, c'r,- u o aRyPaU z e) .,� cc.xUxm Rs .' as",4 7 P.O 0 on ;; a) on a) a) > 'L1 -O v — • O O a) Z ti 0 �y cf. 4. a) ti) w O F� a) O 3 Q ° 6 y` s. O • ° cC E. C s; ... bq O. P. ❑ bA - VI (} a) cd .' ml ml a c a . ❑ ° 4. R Z °G a ❑ a` 4 O. ) Z 0 Uaq b o p ) on V oC a = � oE Ri 0v .r v OO c • a) a) . N 3cO O a) ) yro v � `n > 4Z 3o mi �Vcc, = v 'O irl V. s.. a) UI1 (-NI a) 0 E .�' •. t,l, 3 Rt cc( a) v) c c) a) 1.. .. v) onOW � ) p O 0 .� o O oo a) 'W Zci = E o Ey , ou ° . oR i E Zc 0E a - c = ) . N bq on-0 o a° ) ° U ° -aF-, � c c. o v) Hi -o c 3 E-1 o F-H , v) ,� ZU November 7,2005 %Now Renton City Council Minutes ' Page 379 Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that the annexation area contains three single-family dwellings. The topography of the site is relatively flat where it abuts Hoquiam Ave. NE, and the eastern portion contains steep slopes as a result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that King County's 2005 surface water design standards or greater are recommended at the time of development. The site is served by the following public services: Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer, and the Renton School District. Mr.Erickson stated that existing King County zoning is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre), and the Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. He indicated that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City annexation policies and relevant Boundary Review Board criteria. In regards to the fiscal impact analysis,Mr. Erickson estimated a surplus of$236 at current development, a surplus of$9,278 at full development, and a one-time parks acquisition and development cost of $27,176. Mr. Erickson indicated that the proposed annexation does not present any major impediments to the provision of City services to the area. He concluded that the annexation appears to further Renton business goals and is in the best interests of the City. Public comment was invited. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler referred the request by Virginia Broyles, 11224 142nd Ave. SE, Renton, 98059,for information regarding utility rates and the sewer system to Mr.Erickson. Jim Montcrief, 11216 142nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, stated that an additional house exists in the annexation area,for a total of four dwellings. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ACCEPT THE QUERIN H DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, SUPPORT R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION,AND AUTHORI7F THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. Planning: Boeing Subdistrict This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 1B Conceptual Plan accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider the Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property located south of N. 8th St. and east of Logan Ave. N. Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator,explained that conceptual planning is a requirement of the 2003 development agreement between the City and Boeing, which pertains to the future redevelopment of Boeing Renton Plant site. Conceptual planning provides the City with certainty that its vision will be met,and confidence for its infrastructure commitments. He reported that three subdistricts were created within this site, which bears the Urban Center-North (UC-N) land use designation,and pointed out that a conceptual plan has already been adopted for Subdistrict 1A. November 7,2005 U.► Renton City Council Minutes "` Page 380 Mr. Pietsch reviewed the conceptual plan requirements, which include consistency with the UC-N vision,a description of the development, and an economic benefit analysis. He indicated that the Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan divides the property into two distinct parts. The northern 21 acres is currently under a "right of first offer" agreement with Harvest Partners and likely will be sold in the very near future and be used for retail development. The southern 31 acres, which is not expected to be declared surplus in the near future,contains 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings and remaining land for in-fill development. Continuing,Mr. Pietsch reviewed the economic benefits associated with the development of the two parts of Subdistrict 1B such as job creation and revenues, and he noted that the conceptual plan meets the vision of the UC-N designation. He reported that staff proposes the following two conditions to the plan: 1) Park Ave. N. be designated as a pedestrian-oriented street,and 2) transit facilities be allowed within the northern 21-acre portion should funding opportunities arise and the development of such facilities support the surrounding development and be supported by the property owner(s). Mr. Pietsch stated that staff recommends approval, with conditions,of the Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan. He indicated that the related Committee of the Whole report will be presented to Council for adoption,and if approved,Boeing will then present its Planned Action for Council consideration. Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the potential transit facility and the financing of the infrastructure,Mr. Pietsch stated that Sound Transit's Sound Move 2 plan consists of a parking garage and a bus rapid transit facility. He described future road and trunk utility infrastructure improvements, including the realignment and widening of Park Ave. N., the widening of Logan Ave. N., a new N. 10th St., and the extension of N. 8th St. He explained that as part of the 2003 Boeing development agreement, the City will build main arterial roads and trunk utility lines deemed necessary for the project as long as there is revenue from the development allowing two-thirds of that revenue to support debt service on bonds. The remaining one-third would be for the general fund to support City services. Discussion ensued regarding the number of lanes proposed for Logan Ave.N., the improvements to various area streets such as Park Ave.N. and Garden Ave. N.,the ability of the utility infrastructure to support future expansion of the roads, and the traffic flow in the area. In response to Councilman Corman's comments, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman noted that the City is reevaluating the traffic counts as part of the design process for the area's roadway system, and he described the findings and the adjustments that are being made. Public comment was invited. Ray Giometti, 323 Pelly Ave. N.,Renton, 98055, suggested that the widening of Logan Ave. N. occur sooner than later; otherwise,traffic will be forced onto Park Ave. N., fracturing the North Renton neighborhood. Pointing out that his neighborhood is located across the street from the southern 31-acre portion of Subdistrict 1B,Mr. Giometti expressed opposition to the development of the land for big-box retail use. November 7,2005 'r. Renton City Council Minutes Page 381 Mike O'Donin, 423 Pelly Ave. N.,Renton, 98055, expressed concern that Logan Ave.N. will become a traffic choke point,thereby increasing transit traffic on Park Ave. N. He asked for further review of the Logan Ave. N. expansion. Richard Zwicker,446 Pelly Ave. N.,Renton, 98055,agreed with the previous speakers'comments. He confirmed that the original plan was for Logan Ave. N. to be the main thoroughfare, and for Park Ave. N. to be pedestrian friendly. In response to Council inquiries,Mr. Pietsch confirmed that the street network design was adopted in the 2003 development agreement with Boeing, and the subject conceptual plan is a separate matter. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington pointed out that since Boeing owns the right-of-way on Logan Ave. N.,the City does not have the ability to expand the road beyond three lanes at this time. Councilmembers Corman and Palmer suggested further review of the transportation plan for the subject area. Lee Chicoine,406 Burnett Ave. N., Renton, 98055,expressed concern about the flow and amount of traffic, saying that he wants Logan Ave. N. expanded to five lanes to prevent a choke point. Nora Schultz, 540 Williams Ave. N.,Apt. 12,Renton,98055, stated her desire for consistent traffic flow on Logan Ave. N.,and less traffic on N. 6th St. Ms. Schultz suggested further review of the matter. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN RELATED TO THE BOEING PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR A BRIEFING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: * City Hall Information Desk volunteers were recently presented certificates of appreciation at a dinner hosted by City Clerk Division staff. Since the program's establishment in 1984, the volunteers have given over 51,000 hours of excellent service to the City. * Work is now underway on the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection, Segment 1,construction project, which initially will provide access to the proposed Federal Reserve Bank facility and, ultimately, will result in a new five-lane arterial connecting Renton and Tukwila. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, said she is an Citizen Comment: DeMastus - independent producer with public access cable channel 77,and announced that Firefighter Tribute Program she has completed her firefighter tribute program, which will air on channel 77. She presented a copy of the program to the Council, and suggested that it be cablecast on Renton's government access channel 21 as well. 0\'‘: t12:Pf PUBLIC HEARING BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1B CONCEPTUAL PLAN November 7, 2005 In 2003, the City of Renton and The Boeing Company entered into a Development Agreement whereby changes were made to the City's Comprehensive Plan that allowed rezoning of certain Boeing Company properties. This rezone allowed a wide range of uses under various scenarios that anticipated vibrant, mixed-use development throughout and area designated as Renton's Urban Center-North(UC-N). The UC-N was divided into three Subdistricts. A conceptual plan for Subdistrict 1A(between North 8th Street and Lake Washington Drive)was approved as part of the Development Agreement and amended by the City Council in October 2004. The current Conceptual Plan submitted for approval applies to Subdistrict 1B (see reverse). A conceptual plan must be submitted for each subdistrict prior to subdivision, development, sale, or other alteration of the property not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses. The owner of Subdistrict 1B, The Boeing Company, seeks to subdivide and sell a portion of the property. Therefore, they have submitted a Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict 1B. The Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan should further the Vision of the Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Center—North. Upon review, staff finds that the Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan is consistent with the City's Vision for this area, which anticipates that the southern portion of District 1,between North 6th Street and North 8th Street will be redeveloped into a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use district. A key feature of the proposed Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan is the integration of existing and new structures, interlaced with pedestrian circulation patterns, internal parking areas (both surface and structured), and employment-generating uses. Staff is recommending that Council approve, with conditions, the Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan in accordance with the December 2003 Development Agreement between the City of Renton and The Boeing Company for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plan, known as Subdistrict 1B. r \<\ ' \'_-_ ---'I:,1 .y AP \ l i •\ ,(:) \\ • ,L Sub-District . \ A , ,c. N 8th St. : \ ) :\ NI • CD � Sub-District q. O : B ilia , , 6 s . 4■ LD — i ,1J= ._ = __ N St. A . ■'= —� ■M o — til mil MN m =C ■■ all ii — N 4th St. II :E7-7=7.-- I I I \I W11111W11111r I i ___ 1111: a i!L! IuF _ . f go = 1! I I l_ ■■ �ir � "A it E:IIHui = ' II1JIWi __ 1: "1/4 our. AirportWay = — Abillir MN — i fr" "PA Urban Center North District Sub-areas c ' Districts Subject to Conceptual Plan Approval Note:District boundaries include dedicated R-O-W �-�• Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning •(t� Alex Piasch,Administrator �C G.Del Rosario •N.0• 13 November 2003 ,..,. ,.., a) g, o � o 0 C3 0 Z .(r) k.` C C 0 2 - ia CI. o E '-, A -0 _t iM a) 0 < C IC a) Q a = E Z NC �(1) w CZ U = 0 t) CD co m O + �o co .. ..1 u C ? .... . 1 "4 miC +1 via (1) iiii CfC44 tg 1 I Z, = Ma •VkrO P41‘''' 0 .12 + C1) c u L 7 u� (n O V J Cr) ( l 1 D z a w 01) r [____, C ''' CO ON - ° -�--+ 22 a) N .Co a) -se..-')� (1 O (I) V - U -rn 3 N = -Ea Cl) ♦= } c' Ct. -E-, -1-E• U O .� a) C 1:1) O N 'L 'L O U = (� a� O > N 0 0 cCD E v LoCI)ell � a � � � °' 09E O- >D a) C O 0 �C �> U 0 0 0 J a to LL (� U El 0 or--0,` 0 � JJ , �� , 7 ) ,... .... U) z a) w O 4- Z ° 4-) C (I) 4E° . „fir a) - rT3 U) C o 0 .w c a) a) ., cn >, E _Q ca o c o _ co — � C 4� a) > i ) co 6 _co o ° .. -4-• •_ a5 c_ cuco 0 c al > V a)O 4) U c — . -0 O a)o -Jr. c Li 12 -is.) cn :;--... L2 2 0- a) co a) E -- c 'L c = 2 O C cn o 0 0 0 C AI oc ri) ow ° (I) (75 ° II 00US. ,?' CL . .II S . . . . . . . . . . /0 4' ,2-;ii,-',':'''!":'' ' -ii'-', •g . ' ' ...,:-- ' - -,'.. '. ' '' - ' '''' ''': - ' l'-''''''''':''''''''''' ''''''''' ' L'1 ''''''*9'''''''' '''' , I la c ' - .., '' n , .,„, co a m a : , ...., , ., . , J ,i -, . .... - O .a..„ us 5,. ' ,-, --- - •zt ila ,„ „It4109 r, cirl_ LLJ ,.e 4 5 S c oz -I:14k, , . , ' . ... ,. ''' -,,,,--1 ,...,.:.,':":1;4', .. t,) o L, ) 4 r� _: iw ���■ a �ies '.- .y. o •.cur , { o ■lialur II■��r , N. ! o } ,� \ ■r I � ' �, - • � > Z . Oil Z - Ar' web ' s. mos '�, P i ry i b; -- ' f ...,,,,.,,-,,,A, ...„--- - - -.r. i'7----• - ----4. .,,....... -.1 . I: ...,,_ - 9' . L ' i ''' .1,0;*'._"' 5'.'., '-i.....,. ...4.31".,.„...; rye` .r �,a.1 d1,.,�'.'T` .•�,>' E� t 1-' '5`.4- "..; '''' ' 4.4,11..rf"" . 1.:,,,..ifili ,,-.`,^',- - %.,,,,, ,. . ,„...A '--.Artror4444-t." - ,-,r4 ,,--wa , -�„. `t" Y''#"". r . .---,.4 t . -I_�:.tea t' - , , d { 1 r , ` ,„ re r.'"..t.2 f #�I ,:do- '' 's.: # "`. ";, ;A .,yam'.'-� �.t,,y ,t �' _ - ��, i l ti I , + .,�.,."� " : C' N Cl- fK .4 ♦ M • ^ ,' i �.. G> .p C m •r I, i cp. ,,,,,,zt : ,,. -. .. a) :„.: y„..--..4.-,-.....14...----r *.i`...-':..—'...-- R CV : te '111>.v, t -Ai*�'�+ Lit .. - ... - *. « • • i ,. �y, _ aj7T . xr „r - .., \1 -— '-7.-,-4....cri,,:,,,:.,-.!,':•r:..".1,4:46.:::.,!..,..',,,,,,,,...,, ' ' ...>o . ,,A\„ , I 41.4:, a ^` CO O a) f P E 0 /�\ v •0 W 11. CI) it O .. — � L 40 a. — 0) c) 0 v) }, O a) c c/) •c .— La) c� a) a) iril U a)L 0 c o1 cz a) •c 0 co .. .Q N- CUi: 0._c co O o� ` �o oa o :1 N = CY) m � � �� z . NNW' VVP110 7.--. .....s',.......\ , 0 I I I ....). t..L.1 CD LIJ 0 47 --- N./ i-- ) CE. I) < '...''\ < CO cE 1--Z (3 _I p fi.. ..._._ (.0 (.1) CC ...... X < :7' •1: CI 6:::E X < V-- '..--1.-•-__ €L-0 L 1 --, • .• .__ -.___ Ic).. 7 a ..... > (5 I I 0 I CC 8 L-o L I r: 0 ......I I ....mml. MR NM INN 1111= En me art no me en me um en '--- I r---------, ' '-,.. ----.,_ (V .1. cNi / \ 0 --___.._„., ci.. n- I / I ........ i 7- 0 2 .i i- ..:.. ...., w a. I Cl. 1 1 w 1,0 fJ) I I I I II 0 .7r- ....J 1 ,, ) it -, fir 'ic..' -: f? I 0 I in I-- < I• - s I _ x < .. C•1 0 cn,-..s.,. < a.,rr ';'. -.... \\ Cl... - 0. ro - r- .- •-• ',! ‘; -,.. 1.11 NM NM min me um am ma smr-?- I '-- \ ',....\ ti Ct. 2 1 .. ... . . e-.. - • -.......,...,_ Cl- < Lij -2.111 c') ic) .;:il' --.. 0 ::•. Q. :-'• QC ‘.f.1 / :.;0::1 ----.. 1 bi.:•*. . '''.. ..''.v N,t 7 fey,,..... \ ---,,, -*---. \ .-.. .11 X CID Ir." CO 0 0 -1--0 -I-0 co (I) "C., CD 7:3 0) iy.... I- O (I) 1— ID CO COD 0 E ------ (f) a) 92 Lo as c 0 II. CC C13 ..... C4:::1 _. .... N E ...c CO O ali) LE al 0 0 0 N— 0 co (1) = • 4,7 1*-A •.• • • C\I . • • . • Ct ...0 • • • III • ••?‘ . . Ng.. -vow i r-N.1....,1 . LD Lu 0 ...... ,...T. C\ Ii .c._- .r% — L..) 1-- ......... a. I co .- 1-- < co cc 7 4,3, 0 CO CC 6 x < E LL1 CD 7 •1: a: ,.... '-'--.• -, C['.0 I. ...* 4 • •..,. .. ..- ,....... --- '"i=ID• l ',E.,..1::Ac:c — .._.:..__. a: co 8 L-0 L -, (7 > 5 u) 11- ..... Cri I ,..,-- --I •cr 1 0 n 1 2,,.. ,-,- r_ ., \\,.....j ----... sin aim aii as MI IIIIII OM INN NM Me MN INN OM < D I i I r---- (1.1 I C .... 6_ > _„, ir• I (nirr CD 1-: c, r. ii _ I 1- • , --, <-( 1 < : •---,,,., \\ '' . , - - I XZ < 0 ,.:.,\ - .:-- 0 C) --i "•••, 1,;., 1.1.1 0 ''''' \ IMO MI .1. EMI .1. Mli NM ale OM #- .1•!!• \ . :J. 'LI' --1 r2 I 7 :4"4' " ' III CC T" I OF ara 9 .., „.....,,,, ,..,., , ,_ -J -; 7.4 < - '> rr c, '7 :- . u. _)lil -' );-.- l-r) CC < .7 ".7 c, LL. .- 0 . U-1 Z •"' 42' - a --) 4, 14-4. - I- X rr (71 t 0 41 w q - %.„.,,_, .\\\\ L4- .1*. Lii -.,i I i el :"..! Ct. :::.. a. 'El ... •1110'. i' ,.., .,',v '',:•.•'5.7r---. \ \ .__ ...._. \ , ;... 6 c -0.- 0 CD Cli) -0 u) C CICS >b A—• o sa ...... IC CD = 4 111 IMINIIIIIIIII (1) (1) C13 0 ,• ••O 0 0 &_. p 0 u) an1111111 CD- - . CY) CU 0 CO I IIIIE (I) ........... •N., — 0 CI) 0 co cm E •_ 0, Lo 14-- I c)- + Ato o a) z 0 0 c (0 co " c IN 151 ? Er z te 4 11 CO Ce 111E• III • • • IP • • • III • `,.' w co H H o COI CO a) N W C O co Cl) 0 ' O O 0 co LO ti 0 C cn U 03 c c 0O NNE _E _., c U .r_t � O 0) c7., 0 a)co 4 .i0 O s c Et 0 O C -45 2 ACT, 0 la 2 c c E 0 0 () }i *kb W 2 g 2 0 Z O 3w + 4 ....Y ..✓ 7F-r 0 H .... z . co L.: a) .; f2 c D _C C a) CD 6 : � § =-_, 0 C c Ea co i �--+ o0 o -6 -iiE° = a) Cl) a) co C) .Cii >N ... a) TT, EjoTo > 73 46 a) .V C- O O _c -c-ti E -- ■ ■ CO 0 v mg > A, 2 0 (I) . E CD (1) _ _, = V EC CD_ 0 CD w • CO a)(n co o a) C) TO -.. -* • C "— C (13 bco0 fci% 'E u_ E a) 0_ v 11 o a) —co 0ft vii LL 0 =. z O !7 8 is lirz S S .0 ��� � . . . . (14 w Q C U CO 0 Cv(3 ■ CL �--+ c to I- O 2 c .O C3 o o ._ • 1 o I U) -2 o o Q CI. � o O a)11 < o Ato 11. 'to . 4w . . . . 7C ' Z w -- 0) U ._ 'r_. CO _O a 'in O "0 C C r) 4- a) E o c a' � � to co I N. 4- 411 -a -0 O CO IV U) C C 15 = § CO W -cm E a) a) o E •—O CCU a) O O li. Lwow E co 0- OQa' -1 + a' += cu o o_ o � ' (I) O c c ro Q o O B 0 0• Aio 13) Q 0 U z 1:2 4. • 11 / 0 • fz O w C CO > ■O.17; O U a_ Q 0_ 0 a) co Z a) a c c c 2 •O co 0 (15 TO -(73° Cl- 2LJ00C'3W -•-• :4-z-i E U ill cu c a) CO 0 0 -0 2 r I a) -0 > ci) no ‘.., L.... ._ , D 13) 13) >, o_ u) 0 -a .> a) 0 co " roC'3Olisi c § 0 a) = to ci) 0 .0 ti= .- Emmen' ten X ° (7) 5 5 E '0 O o o -0 ° 4 < cUO " cU < cL . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . 111 9 . . % +1,¢w it I ... c ..... c--..., Cl) 0 0 = c., c;\ Cli 5- r) 3s ram pc) 0* Mt P \i\ V\ Ca al- SIIli tl---- CA .... nw. Pa .\- ---- 3X •• in g C t a 6 in net g a © CD-) eD 4 --1., cr,Q., n m ur 1 eo n 0 o er, lir on ul r w 0 liv.r, lik-...;,.. Iv"0 !,43 0 z 0 H - o -n ---1 - tti rci 11:)) ,—- 41 iTiDz : M -- = --... . _... G. 4, — toZlz __, 7..... I VC.1 M •=. 71 ' .. 0 Wil '..,gli, Pi - : 0 '... • I 4 .... 4 1- 41 FI I 1 ' : T. ! 0 0 , tl Xl. • • i. _ ° i 1 r• k \ ,_, o - w cm A LA ''40011e > LA 0 0 G 0 n 5. 3: c,..... rn c7,3 (/)----- G. Ct ,,.. U) -- -1---- rn Sz,) C'''s% j.\ 3../ `•C C 0 0J\ TT, g C) 111 tit) m 0 m g ft 0 0 P "t C CA eq. r< —I CFQ r•r• r1 ill J M 0 i.,•1 eo n C . rp, 4\3--• 0 Fr, , ,...r, r ... I-1 r1 0 -. --... 0 in a 0 1,3 io .Li' Cc tji .t. 1 0 4' 0 '-- 2 7:1 rli ' !LP,,,. n ..,_ .. x Z H ::--- tO 0 Eli oo > 2, i :1-- (,t) t...‘ •, _ _ --3 * r-i-11 \ •cfs * .,, ZHirl W ‘...,CI. • ra' .. 1,..1 44 '-' M Qn . ,.., 01110 -..-.: _....... Ki .:-...-.. :kt• 7 D i'..1 is.x , ., :=-_- if; .13 Z Om al D 0 M 0 1 0 0 XI 0 in • . ca - v • z in in o i 1 ea :-.7- n3 CI .1- u) —-• II 0 . +.4 - i 0 ". a • ° I 1 1 c., ,... .., • ,,,-,, .9*. I ' O.1..--, 0 (J1 (../1 itiOt C4 0 0 = a 5' (f)x c) *0 m " CI, Ili (I) t-C 7-- ( -) W '• \1 m DJ C•••- 47. ..\. 0 Xi •./1 g (2 11111 m k.f\ 3:l o 0 g et 0 C' P 145 N.A., I— CP rl, As- M K et, 4 w CN IS1 .... .. M 0 r47 imi c0 Cl `cc.0 n 0 ,.. o Fir ti (J1 01 1)1 Ult r 4* t6) d ei• rxt ill ',..1 U IV 0 r,) J‘ Z .-t-i.,1 1'J '-/.._! 0 0 i-§ 71 0 `o".x r--- 7_ c L..,l ,_< l - ,..a. A,,, - ut D + _ 1 , — aig —1 0 r-::XI Zrr '‘,P.4.2 .... - 0 Z Firl to r- D -% po , gre , z ct. o r- - --; -1 r- ... 0 k 71Z ti,i A op • —..,, . z-^;z 0-.31 - ---, us ,....., 0 0 0 ,-, .„,,,, t: u z v coo is o .,... .... i 1 N. 0 0 it****Ai**Tr erl i 40 I o N b ell U a O J+ b 8 W O J Wi 2 O o I ril w rn '' O ti a � TH cn No a N .�' n7 ` G o li `pa ' ;� n v, c--1. 0 5 n tTJ C o O Coo "4 `. m E a -_ o n0�, 4. ry U R z `" �- W D ,r c0 5 41, n' FFP b et,�xj • _ zNOa LAfl 1 eD �-7 -4 W z o a O z n'� ty ro y = *mc' r z o<� �SSF'\ J _ pr = Uzi = -,t• O V, = O .� - L yV..VI 00CI C� ` :,i bb ?7 = O n X p ; G_1 Z b y �. xi rn co z - i.; ° N .ic:.., ow i -- -. ► IIIII o m A r+ El.vl r — t ` 00 C) ._ c7 i -,0 - `rI ' by �tmm --I o .1, ii o '1m END m iv 11,i. . " ° O 0 ti NO f ' ! y_ o 71 — n t� A m A. O 0 RI O N 1`.- O J j Noe o, , if R1 b c. v C T H � � � Tr nr) no wo o. H r1 NI tv 0,_ `" 0.....„ � � i T m 0 , x" o �O , 4 bo C o �, p„v � m nZ J m �' 0 o a 4 y sill! o n ® N � z � x � w e DV z = A a. H Opz� H v, = z 1 - O <;- s s g 1 rD _ _ b U' U f- M� _ ,DZ o n o\r t'.. VD 1in o ; r. 'o . ' L C7 ,' ' "t '0 ?7O0 �� o1 z:) � °_ zO 7m p (� m ^ fl Ii+ Acl ao IN" n cn g o m b I ` o ill ttl taiiii W h 0 ,, O a a te.. .1. " � m n - o O (` � < T I^ a t=1p y u � F ) . y � 0 ' O -a o 0p -, �, - m by a f a "mE , *11co o aZ Ci Ct r'''• v y - y �h b el)A Z , = AoEl A ca.y -IbonA � -im_ c <S uuOmZ4 ' �_ <S - co> m ., % x m - - z D J. -�IP61� �_ h � _�.�. ri O _ n� •c7 it *W _ c, q ] ( I ; i !t � �l O c`, U . m b A. c A.. ti I til bi wo C w ., ;- , m a C) 4. 4a a T V1 N h Otc �� N �g. y nM 00 � CFs 0 ...- t..1 C e g *11 � rn r mm Z Co W— y�b m c ,, � z e' 0 w C!1 y A. lti . = xi1. , N_ O �rn - Ab oTu A Q. cii — a x a oy 'x 3 S,—Z /� �yC eD 5 ._ f ._, ,, ,,,,,, _ ,..„, ..b., 1 :1=". 1 Y.< Z... ..2 .11,4:7( co z • u si co A :Om m i�. I� p A v' Co m ...., I y Z A„ Z "' i I` A O0 0 `.t i ..I� o .n co o p n c�-i a b A. Ar m IR `No woe File No. Conceptual Plan LOCATIONS OF POSTINGS FOR: Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus poroperty at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1 B, 50.7 acres located generally between N. 6th and 8th Streets, and between Logan and Garden Avenues N. 1. 2. 1�00 �(,/C v\ 6 yt/ci N V (, ` 1/)Am 5 7 1/0 3. L -fN _ y ( 5. n/d' b J � /'/4 ion ' No . L. CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I I/ ' Ill - hereby certify that 6copies of the attached notice were posted by me regarding the property desc ' ed above on the O day of a211 , 2005' . '' SIGNED Wit`\ (y J SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME this 7c I-it day of OC f-4e.✓ , 20 ems. ```••"` tttttli► P►. Spry4.►t,o f S Jam` 01^kI-1/4', '% SIGNED: /( 6 �o _o' Printed Name: Jek s c.-v-t /1. 3Y1 °W cb = �' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of iy,�t 1* % ,A, Washington, Residing at /ee--� f-c yip-F�%\�W�5` My Commission Expires: (,F a ,-v 9 7 H:\CITY CLERK\FORMS\Posting confirmation.doc s; ‘NTC) NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 7, 2005, AT 5:00 P.M. RENTON CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1 B, 50.7 acres located generally between N. 6th and 8th Streets, and between Logan and Garden Avenues N. I/ I C, - --- - / ° Nia -; vi Z a ,4\ Sub-District s, ', A - c�`� e� '.a ��_ 9Asue i , [et k';.:,(,, klt.„,4* ii , pole)* 4100011 i11 ► ,t, Sub-District \\ , 6!,, , MEL,,..--4.,‘ I, , ' il iN ii ii-iy I- 1 i ' i%im: lh ' C,,; 11= .1.4_ . , , All interested parties are invited to attend and present written and/or oral comments. Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office-425-430-6510 ' The removal, mutilation, destruction,or \A1a r n i n concealment of this notice is a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. *my •yrI CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 7th day of November, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to be held in the seventh floor Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, to consider the following: Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1B, 50.7 acres located generally between N. 6`h and 8th Streets, and between Logan and Garden Avenues N. All interested parties are invited to attend the hearing and present written or oral comments regarding the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and interpretive services for the hearing impaired will be provided upon prior notice. For information, call 425-430-6502. Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published King County Journal October 21, 2005 Account No. 50640 10/20/2005 - Notice and Public Hearing Handout sent to 111 Parties of Record, per attached labels. cc: Alex Pietsch \ • i • i--z _ ___ , / —,- , . ., . b. . ( \\) Ill OPP r.,Do Sub-District \ , ., ,:, ..,, , . . . ,, ,,,,.„, _,‘,., ., . NI 8th"-St.%: A ' \ ) N.---i • al 000r r , ! ... Sub-District 0 IL ., . , . , I C:3 6 S . r- -D B • • 1 1111 , • , _..., . __ • n _ , . . II _ 1 If Af = N 4th St. _ 6§11..• ---. mi = 7.-= mlimi- Nina MI NI 1 . .... ....1. = .1.. . .1... _ ., -A, wiz _a_. mu __- It—' 111/...... NM MI —„/=_ n•L_,J,IMO. Li) El a) —— zia -4\7_ey ... MI--a— ii..-------- rilin ,- ...1 > —_8:, —1. \ ,_- :I dl.,:i rjall IIII MO 1 I rtc — :-.7 i sif FA , , LE -------- El. — •1• Airport Way =HE= III . ' •s , ■ . - re..I. _.-- Lin , 41 ---------7- Nile ..1. _ MIIIIIIII NM= — 111=NM .1411.1 N MiNI $tl i 1, = 1" ir mil 1 num. I .. 41111 it 4011 A MINE1111111 gin111111-2FIE Urban Center North District Sub-areas Districts Subject to Conceptual Plan Approval Note:District boundaries include dedicated R-O-W •C Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning £• • Alex Pictsch,Administrator T MoelvRemcV2003 `SY O ® ‘e ‘e$1 . }" NT PUBLIC HEARING BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1B CONCEPTUAL PLAN November 7, 2005 In 2003, the City of Renton and The Boeing Company entered into a Development Agreement whereby changes were made to the City's Comprehensive Plan that allowed rezoning of certain Boeing Company properties. This rezone allowed a wide range of uses under various scenarios that anticipated vibrant, mixed-use development throughout and area designated as Renton's Urban Center-North(UC-N). The UC-N was divided into three Subdistricts. A conceptual plan for Subdistrict 1A (between North 8th Street and Lake Washington Drive)was approved as part of the Development Agreement and amended by the City Council in October 2004. The current Conceptual Plan submitted for approval applies to Subdistrict 1B (see reverse). A conceptual plan must be submitted for each subdistrict prior to subdivision, development, sale, or other alteration of the property not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses. The owner of Subdistrict 1B,The Boeing Company, seeks to subdivide and sell a portion of the property. Therefore, they have submitted a Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict 1B. The Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan should further the Vision of the Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Center—North. Upon review, staff finds that the Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan is consistent with the City's Vision for this area, which anticipates that the southern portion of District 1,between North 6th Street and North 8th Street will be redeveloped into a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use district. A key feature of the proposed Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan is the integration of existing and new structures, interlaced with pedestrian circulation patterns, internal parking areas(both surface and structured), and employment-generating uses. Staff is recommending that Council approve,with conditions, the Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan in accordance with the December 2003 Development Agreement between the City of Renton and The Boeing Company for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plan, known as Subdistrict 1B. vane Nei 7225500105 7225500020 7224500355 1995 MANN LIMITED FAMILY PA AJAYI JUDITH C ANGEVINE THERESA+ C/O D MANN 415 WILLIAMS AV N HOOKS DION V 17437 SE 102ND ST RENTON WA 98055 514 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 7224500020 7224500260 0723059001 ARAGON_HECTOR+FRAULEIN+ BARNES CLIFFORD L SR+DENICE BOEING COMPANY THE MACA 505 WILLIAMS AV N 100 N RIVERSIDE M/C 5003-4027 1803 N 185TH ST RENTON WA 98055 CHICAGO IL 60606 SEATTLE WA 98133 7224500275 7225500065 7224500340 BRAINARD IRENE BROSKA BRYAN P+ANN K BROTTEN LANNETTE C 519 WILLIAMS AV N 451 WILLIAMS AV N 524 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7224500235 7224000745 7224000926 BRUSH TRICIA CAO MIN+ZHIDONG WANG CARRILLO JOSE LUIS+ZAYDA N 514 WILLIAMS AV N 702 175TH PL NE 530 PELLY AV N RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98008 RENTON WA 98055 7224000740 7224500035 7224500010 CHENG KAM KEUNG+ANGELA W C CHIEN TE-YU CLANCY HEATHER K+MEGAN M 229 SW 193RD PL C/O PRESTIGE PROP MNGMNT 505 PELLY AV N NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 12505 BEL-RED RD RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98005 7224000780 7224000970 7225500085 COLLINS BRUCE DONALD COLLODI FLORIO CORNELIUS WILLIAM E+JODIE C PO BOX 2996 3709 JONES AV NE 442 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 7225500100 7224500360 0823059217 CRECELIUS LEWIS CUTTING LARRY D DASH 80 LP 428 BURNETT N 16919 150TH AV SE 440 N FIRST ST#200 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 SAN JOSE CA 95112 7224500345 7225500215 7225500235 DEADMAN ROBERT C DENNISON DAYTON P+MARILYNN DETHMAN PAMELA J 520 BURNETT AV N 3717 LK WASH BL N 428 WILLIAMS AV NORTH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 7224000785 0723059053 7224000760 EMERY SAM E FACILITIES&OPERATIONS CTR FAKHARZADEH AMIR 2522 N PROCTOR ST APT 12 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 11226 AUBURN AVE S TACOMA WA 98406 300 SW 7TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 7224500095 7225500220 0723059098 FARBER KENNETH W FASHAW PAUL A FEDERAL RECOVERY OF WA 524 WELLS AV N 436 WILLIAMS AV N PO BOX 1435 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 TACOMA WA 98401 'tore 7224000940 7224500215 7224000950 FISH JOHN T+N.VEANN TAWNEY FIX GRACE FLYNN TERRY 526 PELLY AV N PO BOX 202 516 PELLY AV N RENTON WA 98055 DUVALL WA 98019 RENTON WA 98055 7224500300 7224500075 7224500230 FRANKLIN IRA L+BEVERLY K FRIEND VICKIE D FUNG LAWRENCE H+JUNE C 537 WILLIAMS AV NORTH 540 WELLS AV N 6349 52ND AV S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE wa 98118 7224000730 7224500375 7224000845 GALLUZZO JOHN&LINDA GASSER JOHN K GIETZEN JEFF D+JENNIFER 8519 129TH PL SE 708 N 5TH ST 21701 HWY 99 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 LYNNWOOD WA 98036 7225500115 7224500025 7224000755 GRAHAM JOHN M GREENSTEIN TODD&STACEY GUNDMUNDSON NANCY L PO BOX 2428 517 PELLY AV N 102 LAKE AV S KIRKLAND WA 98083 SEATTLE WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7224500050 7224000955 7225500035 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HART SHIRLEY HOLMAN MICHAEL P+ANNETTE L SEATTLE SOUTH KING COUNTY 512 PELLY AV NO 421 WILLIAMS AV N 13925 INTERURBAN AV S STE A RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98168 7224500190 7225500080 7224500225 HOLMES DENNIS W HOOT CHERYL L HOWE EVELYN J 546 N WILLIAMS 16434 SE 235TH ST 14548 SE 51ST ST RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 98042 BELLEVUE WA 98006 7224000980 7224500315 7224500170 IRVIS KATHLEEN M JEFF'S AUTO REPAIR INC KAERCHER RICK 500 PELLY AV N 21701 HWY 99 PO BOX 8 RENTON WA 98055 LYNNWOOD WA 98036 HOBART WA 98025 7225500225 7225000065 7224000925 KOWALSKI EMIL J KUNOVSKY ALAN M KURASPEDCANI TIM 432 N WILLIAMS ST 8441 SE 68TH ST#221 PO BOX 208 RENTON WA 98055 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 7225000060 7224500220 7225500240 LAWRENCE DAVID T+CHERYL L LEAHY JEFFREY M MARSHALL JOHN R M 13306 SE 196TH ST 524 WILLIAMS AV N 420 WILLIAMS AV N RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 7224000775 7224000860 7225500095 MATHWIG DAVID J MCEVOY AL B+SALLY G MEAD ROBERT C 440 PELLY AV N 18321 SE 147TH PL 432 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 7224500185 7225500230 7224500350 MORELAND DON& BOB MORITZ GARY MUNAGLIA DOMINIC A&TERR M 809 NO 6TH#3 2525 NE 24TH ST 518 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 7225500050 7224500305 7225500015 MUNSON ERIC M MUNSON RONALD W+ELIZABETH A NAICKER KESVAN 433 WILLIAMS AV N 623 CEDAR AV S 8312 132RD ST E RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 UPYALLUP WA 98373 7224500030 7224500280 7224500160 NELSON DAVID+NELSON ALLISON NGUYEN LINH M NICOLI DARIO+CAROL E TRUSTE 525 PELLY AV N 1509 MCDOUGALL AV C/O MARIO J NICOLI RENTON WA 98055 EVERETT WA 98201 529 WELLS AV N RENTON WA 98055 7224500245 7224500015 7224000675 OLSON CARRIE K OLSON JERRY R P&L VENTURES 502 WILLIAMS AV N 13802 SE 141ST ST 17915 NE 19TH PL RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 BELLEVUE WA 98008 7223000010 7224500242 7224500085 PACCAR INC PERAZA EDUARDO+ PETCI-INICK GRATZER& ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING OLGA URQUIETA GUNDERSON PO BOX 1518 508 WILLIAM AV N 534 WELLS AV N BELLEVUE WA 98009 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7225500120 7225500045 7564600106 POZEGA JUSTIN A PRITCHARD JANELLE RAE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 414 BURNETT AV N 431 WILLIAMS AV N 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7225500110 7224000881 7224000865 REUTIMANN LINDA JEAN RIFFLE GARY M RIFFLE GARY+LINDA 7025 116TH AV SE 541 PARK AV N 16846 188TH AV SE NEWCASTLE wa 98056 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 7224000850 7224000975 7224500090 ROGOJIN PETER J+LINDA M RUBIO ANTONIO CASTILLO RUSSO ROBERT A 7634 S LAKERIDGE DR 1006 N 5TH ST 528 WELLS AV NORTH SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7225500210 7224500335 7225500025 SANTOS CRISPIN C+LILIBETH C SCHULTZ NORMAN CORP SHARMA VISHNU DEO 444 WILLIAM AV N 7634 S SUNNYCREST RD 16446 11 ITH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 7224500080 7225500205 7225500040 SIMMS DANIEL+VICKIE FRIEND SIMPSON MICHAEL G+ANDREA L SMITH JOHN F+SHARON L 20901 I34TH PL SE 450 WILLIAMS AV N 12216 164TH AV SE KENT WA 98042 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 7224500265 7224500005 7224500365 SWANKE CRAIG D THOMASON DEBRA L THOMPSON HEATHER 509 WILLIAMS AV N 916 N 5TH ST 702 N 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7224500270 7225500090 7224500285 . TOMICH RONNIE TRAN PHUOC+THI NUOI FANG TU UYSAL MEHMET 30738 229TH PL SE 438 BURNETT AV N 527 WILLIAMS AV N BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7224500290 7224500325 7224500180 UYSAL MEHMET+RAZIYE VIDELL VICTOR E+LANCE M WEBB PAUL+MELINDA L 529 WILLIAMS AV N 536 BURNETT AV N 541 WELLS AV N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7224500045 7225500125 7224500240 WEISS CONNIE J WESSEL JOHN THOMAS+ WHEELER MELANIE 531 PELLY AV N TAMARA CHRISTINE 512 WILLIAMS AV N RENTON WA 98055 410 BURNETT AV N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7564600095 7224500065 0823059127 WIEMEYER CHARLES A II WONG PHILIP J WOODALL WENDELL 1220 N 5TH ST 4067 24TH PL S 329 NW 2ND PL RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98108 RENTON WA 98055 7225500075 7224000770 YAMAMOTO DICK ZWICKER RICHARD D+MARTHA G Boeing Realty 10811 SE LAKE RD 446 PELLY AV NORTH P.O.Box 3707,MC 1F-58 BELLEVUE WA 98004 RENTON WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98124 Shaunta Hyde Rick Ford Jan Fedor P.O. Box 3707, MC 14-49 P.O. Box 3707, MC P.O. Box 3707,MC Seattle, WA 98124 MC 6301 MC 6301 Seattle,WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98124 Debbie Evans - Boeing site address cha' e Page 1 From: Janet Conklin To: ORG ALL Date: 6/20/2005 2:20:31 PM Subject: Boeing site address change As you all know, Boeing has sold off much of the land they once owned. They no longer have any street frontage at 800 Park Ave N. So I have given them a new address that reflects the location of the remaining plant. The new address is...drumroll please... 737 Logan Ave N Please start using this address for permitting and inspection purposes ASAP. Thanks, Jan Conklin City of Renton Development Services Department jconklin@cisenton.wa.us 425-430-7276 Fax 425-430-7231 {Idd(ess Cad /e- -P'or Pud//c Nalrces •\ \q\ce5 NJ6 ,1\[_,_a .„ _ ,a 15 zreptt Ctsho,,,,,,,,a... _ CIV OF RENTON 0 wr? ?,. v JW1� 1 2 LUO3 1�""v RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE wpi 1 t61 -`k 0 , . 1 )O. 13z5- 3 tic, tq Lt 1 Stk1 w� ' 1S1.7-it 0 iTIGK VA, tr Ova- -,ettev- To. Bs 5 D1 tic/ P. 31 Y J t-ii&, rt.c . (v ‘*- b 1 is-LC te 361 1 5e-04-e. > ') 5 u3 h TIlt . N . N , ,. . , �� � v\I- v.02-3 k-6 44_, H 01/40'1\X-iv) 0.1dm, , 111,0,i3A, Mit. - TN_ , 1 Hc k ,e, )-(6k (A)6e> t i i, i Shaunta R.Hyde Manager eC. )2t_ i p_ Local Government Relations G �JLG-Cti 01._ Puget Sound - The Boeing Compan B (S O.Box 3707 MC 1 9_ 9d1 1-111/1-1‘ Seattle,WA 98124-2207 J U N 1- 2 �`1`O 3 Fax 206 544 204 -0182 RECEIVED Cellular 206-856-6444 CITY CLERKS 0 PleEta.r.hyde@boeing.com CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 7th day of November, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to be held in the seventh floor Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, to consider the following: Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1B, 50.7 acres located generally between N. 6th and 8th Streets, and between Logan and Garden Avenues N. All interested parties are invited to attend the hearing and present written or oral comments regarding the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and interpretive services for the hearing impaired will be provided upon prior notice. For information, call 425-430-6502. 4 ? 144.4., j. Lt) J " Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published King County Journal October 21, 2005 Account No. 50640 October 17,2005 so, Renton City Council Minutes _ Page 359 Planning: Boeing Subdistrict Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department 1B Conceptual Plan recommended approval, with conditions, of Boeing's Subdistrict 1B Conceptual V a Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property located south of N. 8th St. and east of Logan Ave. N. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearing on 11/7/2005. Legal: Penalty Provisions Legal Division requested the emergency adoption of an ordinance clarifying Clarification in City Code penalty provisions in Title IV,Title V and Title IX of City Code. Council concur. (See page 361 for ordinance.) CAG: 03-151,Duvall Ave NE Transportation Systems Division requested approval of Supplemental Improvements King County Agreement No. 3 to CAG-03-151, agreement with Berger/Abam Engineers,Inc. Portion,Berger/Abam for design services in the amount of$85,409 for the King County portion of the Engineers Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. (King County will reimburse the City for the additional costs.) Council concur. Public Works: WRIA 9 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the WRIA 9 Salmon Salmon Habitat Plan Habitat Plan entitled "Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, Making our Watershed Fit for a King." Council concur. (See page 360 for resolution.) MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report regarding Committee of the Whole Renton's 2006 legislative priorities. The Committee concurred with the Council: 2006 Legislative recommendation of the Administration to adopt the 2006 legislative priorities Priorities as presented. Topics include municipal finance, transportation funding, economic development and annexation tools, land use, law enforcement, and the Growth Management Act. The Council further authorized the Administration to work with other agencies and the State Legislature regarding these issues and initiatives on its behalf. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Sprint Franchise: Sprint Communications Company L.P. Master Use Agreement, which will generate Communications, Fiber Optic revenue of$3,000 annually over the proposed ten-year term. Sprint Communication Facilities Communications, a telecommunications provider and carrier, requested the master use agreement, and plans to build a lateral fiber route from their backbone system in Tukwila to their switch site located at 1415 Maple Ave. SW in Renton. The build is for Sprint's own corporate use. Conduit and fiber will be installed underground using conventional trenching,horizontal boring, and directional drilling methods. City Code encourages telecommunications services such as this to promote competition and provide advanced services on the widest possible basis to businesses, institutions, and residences of the City for the future. The Committee further recommended that the master use agreement ordinance be presented for reading. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 361 for ordinance.) OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA*.oLL AI#: G • Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP October 17, 2005 Staff Contact Alex Pietsch(x6592) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan Approval Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Proposed Conceptual Plan Information Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center—North Recommended Action: Approvals: • Refer the Conceptual Plan to Committee of Legal Dept X the Whole Finance Dept X • Set a public hearing on November 7, 2005 Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTIONS: The Boeing Company is proposing a Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1B. The 2003 Development Agreement with the Boeing Company requires Council adoption of a Conceptual Plan prior to redevelopment. This Conceptual Plan will serve as the basis for all future land use approvals related to this development. A public hearing to consider the proposed plan should be set on November 7, 2005. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Conceptual Plan with the following conditions: • Park Avenue be designated as a"pedestrian-oriented street;"and • That transit facilities (e.g., transit stops, stations,parking, etc.)be allowed within the"ROFO area"should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s). RentoH:\EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers-Agenda Bills-Ctte Reports\2005\Boeing 1B Conceptual Plan Agenda Bill 10-10-05.doc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, C> eiPet NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC + PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Yam'"0.,� Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor ,, FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator(x 6592) ha SUBJECT: BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1B CONCEPTUAL PLAN ISSUE: The City Council is asked to approve a Conceptual Plan, in accordance with the December 2003 Development Agreement between the City and The Boeing Company, for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plant, known as Subdistrict l B. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed Conceptual Plan with the following conditions: • Park Avenue be designated as a"pedestrian-oriented street;" and • That transit facilities(e.g., transit stops, stations,parking, etc.)be allowed within the"ROFO area" should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s). BACKGROUND SUMMARY: 2003 Boeing Development Agreement and Conceptual Planning In 2003, the City of Renton worked with The Boeing Company to change its land use policies and regulations to bring about the potential surplus and sale of portions of its Renton Plant for redevelopment. In addition to a significant Comprehensive Plan Amendment, creation of two new zoning designations (Urban Center North 1 and Urban Center North 2), and expanded design guidelines, Boeing and the City established a Development Agreement establishing the public and private responsibilities necessary to bring about successful redevelopment. One of the key provisions of the Development Agreement was Conceptual Planning. h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc Boeing Subdistrict 1B ConceptualA, `.r Page 2 of 6 October 10,2005 In order to give the City some assurance and comfort about when and how properties would be made surplus and redeveloped in the future, the Development Agreement requires that Boeing plan and the City Council approve, in a conceptual way, three large "subdistricts"that make up the Renton Plant"at the time at which the Owner wishes to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property within the subdistricts for uses not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses." The Development Agreement included a Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict lA and it was approved by adoption of the Development Agreement. This is the property that was purchased by Harvest Partners. However,while another development group, Center Oak, was considering purchase of the property, it presented and the Council adopted a slight revision to the Subdistrict lA Conceptual Plan in October 2004. Harvest Partners continues to plan its redevelopment of this property consistent with the amended Conceptual Plan. Now, The Boeing Company seeks to subdivide and sell a portion of Subdistrict 1B and has presented the attached Conceptual Plan for the Council's consideration. Requirements of a Conceptual Plan Per the 2003 Development Agreement, a proposed Conceptual Plan will include: • A narrative describing the conceptual redevelopment proposal and its relationship to the Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center— North; • The estimated timing and sequencing of property surplus and sale(if applicable); • A description of the proposed uses, including the general mix of types, estimated square footage of each building and parking for each structure, heights and residential densities; • The general description of use concentrations (i.e.,residential neighborhoods, office or retail cores, etc.); • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation that includes a hierarchy and general location of type, including arterials,pedestrian-oriented streets, other local roads and pedestrian pathways; • General location and size of public open space; and • An economic benefit analysis demonstrating the conceptual development's anticipated economic impact to local,regional and state governments. The Development Agreement states "the Council will base its approval on the proposed Conceptual Plan's fulfillment of the adopted Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center—North. Once adopted,the City will use the Conceptual Plan to evaluate all subsequent development permit applications within the subdistricts based on consistency. Proposed Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan The attached Conceptual Plan proposal outlines Boeing's plans for the redevelopment of the property south of N. 8th St. and east of Logan Ave. N. It divides the property into two distinct parts: the northerly 21.2 acres that is currently under a"right of first offer" h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc Boeing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual lyre ` Page 3 of 6 October 10,2005 (ROFO) agreement with Harvest Partners and will likely be sold in the very near future, and the southern portion of the Subdistrict, which contains 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings with re-use potential and 12.85 acres of remaining land available for in-fill redevelopment. The Conceptual Plan describes redevelopment of the ROFO property as complementary of the urban retail development currently being planned by Harvest Partners to the north. It includes the possibility of as much as 270,000 square feet of retail,with one large- format(big-box) retailer on the eastern side of the property. Small and medium-sized shops would also be developed on either side of Park Avenue. The plan also shows pedestrian connections between the remaining properties to the south, through the retail development and to Park Ave. This plan is consistent with the thoughts Harvest Partners has expressed to date regarding development of this property. And, all indications are that the company will exercise their right of first offer and purchase this property. The economic benefit analysis in the plan suggests that redevelopment of the ROFO property would create 1,061 direct and indirect new jobs,predominately retail-oriented, annual tax revenues to Renton of$856,000 beginning in 2008, and$667,000 in one-time revenue to the City during construction. Boeing indicates that, for the most part, the ROFO area is the only property that is available for redevelopment in the near future. The timing of surplus of the remaining property is longer term—five to 10 years,perhaps. However, this property has significant potential to house high-paying jobs in the future in both the re-used existing buildings and in new office and lab buildings. In fact,the Conceptual Plan describes capacity of the remaining properties of as much as 900,000 square feet of new lab space in addition to the existing 660,000 square feet of office buildings. If the in-fill properties were developed as more traditional offices, the potential square footage reduces to 540,000 square feet. A 4.9-acre property in the southwest corner of the subdistrict may be available for redevelopment more quickly. This property is the site of the 10-71 building, a 144,000- square foot laboratory facility. The City has worked with Boeing and potential users to explore the possible re-use of this facility for life sciences research or,possibly even manufacturing. The Conceptual Plan includes the possibility that this building may be re- used. It also allows multi-family or retail development to occur, if a user for the existing building cannot be found in a timely manner. Additionally,the Plan includes the possibility that the southeast corner of the property, described as DP-3, could be developed as retail to support the emerging job center in the area. If the property was redeveloped to the full potential outlined in the Plan, the economic benefit analysis shows that more than 2,100 direct and indirect new jobs would be created by full redevelopment. One-time revenues to the City would top $6.2 million and new recurring revenues to Renton would nearly reach$2.3 million. h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Page 4 of 6 October 10,2005 The Vision and Policies of the Urban Center—North Renton's Vision for redevelopment of the Urban Center—North, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, is one of dramatic change as existing low-rise industrial and mid- rise office buildings are reconfigured into a dynamic new retail and office neighborhood. This vision would be supported by the proposed plan for the ROFO area. The Vision states, "Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed-use, urban scale office, and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses." The conceptual plan for the ROFO area, in conjunction with Harvest Partners' plan for the area north of N. 8th St.,meets the first part of this vision. The plan for the remaining area to the south meets the second part of the Vision. Also,part of the Vision for the Urban Center-North is "a dense employment center." Although the end users are unknown at the present time, the concept of combining new structures and re-utilizing high-quality existing structures will meet the vision of job growth occurring in"high-quality,well-designed flex-tech development and low- to mid- rise office, lab, and research and development buildings...with ground-related retail." The Purpose Statement for the Urban Center—North envisions redevelopment at a larger scale than found in Downtown Renton with a wider range of uses,taking advantage of the greater size of available land holdings. These uses are anticipated to include some industrial-type uses as ongoing within the larger context of commercial/retail, office, and residential. The building heights proposed by the conceptual plan would be consistent with both the existing buildings to remain and Policy LU-265: "Support more urban intensity of development(e.g. building height, [etc.])than with land uses in the suburban areas of the City..." The combination of large-format retail development with medium-format retailers and smaller, specialty retail shops along Park Avenue meets the intent of Policy LU-301: "Ensure that big-box [large-format] retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban-scale retail developments." The conceptual plan has a pedestrian orientation within the site,with connections to the perimeter along N 6th St. and Park Ave. This concept is consistent with Policy LU-303: "Encourage pedestrian-oriented development..." The eventual proposed parking ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet is consistent with Policy LU-311: "Reduce the suburban character of development,preserve opportunities for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking standards." h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc Boeing Subdistrict 113 Conceptua 44w., -coy Page 5 of 6 October 10,2005 Possible Conditions of Plan Approval While the proposed Conceptual Plan is consistent with the Vision and Policies of the Urban Center—North, staff asks the City Council to consider approving the plan with two conditions. First, given the fact that Boeing proposes pedestrian connections through the property to Park Avenue, making it the main pedestrian access to the retail/entertainment development expected to develop in Subdistrict 1A to the north, and the large number of office/lab workers that will one day be in the area when the existing office buildings are re-occupied and in-fill development occurs, staff believes that Park Avenue should have a strong pedestrian orientation. The Urban Center Design Guidelines provide enhanced streetscape and urban design requirements on streets specifically designated as "pedestrian oriented." Staff proposes that Park Avenue between N. 8th and N. 6th Streets be designated as a"Pedestrian-Oriented Street" in the Conceptual Plan approval. This is consistent with the Vision: "Initial development may be characterized by ... a strong pedestrian-oriented spine along Park Avenue" and Policy LU-300: "Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian-oriented streets to create urban configurations." Additionally, staff proposes preserving the possibility of siting a transit facility in the ROFO area. As the City Council is aware, the City, the State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Sound Transit have been planning a HOV Direct Access Interchange on Interstate 405 at N. 8th Street. Additionally, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is being planned as a high-capacity transit strategy, linking Renton to Bellevue and other locations on the Eastside. Current plans for BRT, have busses exiting the freeway at N. 8th and landing in the redevelopment area, before traveling south along Logan Avenue to the Downtown Transit Center. If the City, State, and Sound Transit can outline a plan and funding for development of a transit facility, that may include passenger load/unload areas, structured parking, etc, that is supportive of redevelopment and supported by the property owners, the Conceptual Plan should allow such a facility to be developed. This is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Objective NN: "Implement Renton's Urban Center consistent with the `Urban Centers criteria of the [King County] Countywide Planning Policies to create an area of concentrated employment and housing with direct service by high capacity transit..." and Policy LU: "Renton's Urban Center should be maintained and redeveloped with supporting land use decisions and projects that... support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on automobiles..." CONCLUSION: The Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict 1B is generally consistent with the Vision and Policies established in the Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Center—North and should be supported with the following conditions: 1) Park Avenue be designated a"Pedestrian-Oriented Street," and c:\documents and settings\mpetersen\local settings\temp\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptualvie Page 6 of 6 October 10,2005 2) Transit facilities would also be an allowed within the"ROFO area," should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s). Approval of this Conceptual Plan will form the basis for all land use approvals going forward, unless the Plan is amended with City Council approval. Attachments: Urban Center—North Vision,Objectives,and Policies Proposed Conceptual Plan cc: Jay Covington—AJLS Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman—PBPW Administrator Neil Watts—Development Services Director Ben Wolters—EDNSP Director Jennifer Henning—Development Services Principal Planner Nancy Weil—Development Services Senior Planner h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc -....., ..... SENECA REAL ESTATE GROUP INC. ANN ,. vr,„4, ..,, , . 'f r, 11 at '' El • 41,.. •11.. .. ;r- ,.. r..... • i •,,, . .• .., . . . . 111 • ..„-...- ' - ....E.,,_ • ---- .,-.,:.. . 0 4, . 411111111ftp a n.7., THE BOEING COMPANY CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUB-DISTRICT 1-B Submitted to the City of Renton October 3, 2005 °r•w CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Sub-District 1-B Renton, Washington Background The Boeing Company has been working with the City of Renton since early 2003 to evaluate potential redevelopment strategies associated with its 737 facility in Renton, Washington(the"Renton Plant Site"). In December 2003, The Boeing Company and The City of Renton entered into a Development Agreement that established certain roles and responsibilities for the potential phased redevelopment of all or a portion of the Renton Plant Site, including: • Renton commitments to fund and construct certain public infrastructure improvements; • Boeing commitments to fund certain private aspects of redevelopment; and • Boeing commitments to complete Conceptual Plans when it elects to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property for uses not related to airplane manufacturing. Per the terms of the Development Agreement, Conceptual Planning was anticipated to occur incrementally, and would be completed for three discrete areas of the Site, known as Sub-Districts 1-A and 1-B, and District 2 (see Exhibit 1). City Council approved Boeing's Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-A in December 2003 and amended it in October 2004. Boeing subsequently sold this portion of the Site to Harvest Partners in December 2004. Harvest Partners is currently refining its development plan for Sub-District 1-A, which is also sometimes referred to as both Lots 1 —4 and Lakeshore Landing. Harvest Partners' preliminary planning anticipates the development of an urban retail center containing approximately 800,000 square feet of retail, with the potential for additional hotel, office space and multifamily residential units. Construction of the retail project is anticipated to begin in 2006. Sub-District 1-B Sub-District 1-B is located immediately to the south of Lakeshore Landing, as illustrated on Exhibit 2, and totals approximately 50.7 acres, net of that portion which has been reserved for the extension of a four-lane 8th Avenue between Logan and Park Avenues. As is outlined within the 2003 Development Agreement, the construction of two new lanes along this segment of 8th is necessary to support the redevelopment of Sub-District 1-B (see Exhibit 3). Page 1 of 9 October 3,2005 The City of Renton is currently completing its design for this segment of 8th Avenue, and expects to begin building at least the two northern-most lanes in March, 2006, simultaneous with the other infrastructure improvements necessary to support the redevelopment of Sub-District 1-A. Ultimately, two additional lanes (to the south) along this same segment of 8th will be required to support the redevelopment of District 2. Harvest Partners has a Right of First Offer to purchase a portion of the Sub-District which totals approximately 21.2 acres (see Exhibit 3). Harvest Partners has indicated their interest in developing this portion,known as the ROFO area, with retail uses that are complementary with the proposed development of Sub-District 1-A as an urban retail center. The development intent of the ROFO area as depicted with this Conceptual Redevelopment Plan is based upon feedback from Harvest Partners as to their proposed project and from The City of Renton as to their goals for redevelopment within the Urban Center North. The remainder of Sub-District 1-B contains approximately 29.5 acres and is described herein as the "Boeing Remainder", as illustrated on Exhibit 2. Portions of the Boeing Remainder are currently improved with office buildings that Boeing owns and will continue to utilize as part of on-going airplane manufacturing plant operations. Interspersed between these existing office buildings are approximately 12.85 acres of the Boeing Remainder that have been identified as potential development parcels("DP 1" through "DP 4") within this Conceptual Plan. Submittal Included within this submittal are a narrative description of Boeing's proposal for Sub- District 1-B, a Conceptual Planning Diagram, and two economic benefit analyses demonstrating a range of potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by: (1) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the ROFO portion of the Sub-District(beginning in 2007); and (2) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the Boeing Remainder (beginning in 2007 for DP 1 and in 2016 for DP 2—DP 4). Boeing seeks the City's approval of this Conceptual Plan so that it can complete a Binding Site Plan creating additional lots, and finalize negotiations with Harvest Partners related to the acquisition of the ROFO portions of the Sub-District. The timing of a land surplus decision by Boeing or redevelopment associated with the majority of the Boeing Remainder(with the exception of DP1) is not currently envisioned to occur sooner than 5 to 10 years in the future. Page 2 of 9 October 3,2005 1 { � ii i. ' , r j8IA i4 � � ' .y - + £13, - Alt". � ��i z -$ i �- .� . T t. 14: 4,44 F ( t F :11_0,44,1:;,...:1:;:iriv.... t_ W4 S �.a L f-- 4474'41,xr a �} a € ,..,t x -.• .ape#' ..: ':§ i. •ii .sue ,tom . .- - r k •ri. 5 ..i 4. - 4 #;. i, q.€ µ,men u/W it---4:44,'' 54.,'-;_-: -"`-----":':;5'-....-fart/-•`.4--- ' - ' " ;'„f .,. 'i„' 1 -_, '-1-. -', ;;„'.---'4,:--i';-,1:.,'*-- '', . ),. 8 •�- a 't -' - F ._t" } 4 c ty j V a -S �I y 3 k" 3 i s j1 r-4* - '45 _ T .3 //y�y ,,,,t.,,„,,,-,--..-•,, ,.:,,,,,,„,;.- - i Nolw,„ r , y i fl',.742„iilt:005,%qc:::":4•1 ;,.,- -401104eL0 -::74'.:---'''-'"--- -, '1: -?'„ ' :14 ' ,fig 8.4, - � F } ' - �- .,� V . 3 , � , , ,174-'4'-`..-'1,--1.'-'4-, ''-rr -,-2A.;::,,i',-4":-1 "', 'A,- -^.. -'"40r :1-I.,' -.,,'.„---; 1,:"'''t'''''--1 --fr'' '''''''''4` % ! t s ' tiJ? ., -; "ice ,� ',i„,,-Ar;.':';;;:-:.'- • ••,"-IT''''14h.110--. - _ •. .,„_,-. Allil R--sr .. .,-. --,..41,--- .'t,,, „.; „.„-- '`-", „„., .‘ ..-.4. -'"L.', #41.77.' --\ .-: ' V ,4 o *41110 September 26,2005 C C E PTUA L PLAN FULLER SEARS peji___Ad!iP'40E,Alia ARCHITECTS SUB-DISTRICT 1 -B u NORTH 8TH STREET — R I ' . R MAX30%LOTCOVERAGE 9 f' , IF 1-STORY RETAIL - I i. P (270,000 SF) R 4 „� ; I r f. EXIST DATA R R \,..,......._....ej HUB ' I I -�,, I > � .. EXISTING W GARAGE } ,.I v 6 GARAGE W I DP-+2 �J . t :� w DP-1 7 _ ma_ _ z ,r k LLI P -3. E r ' i I DP-4 NOT .I �uga 1 D I , a 1 PAR • g� Al i ...____ .- .ems" : _ NORT ? H STREET ,4,r.1.0,---o- -st,-,,,, DP-1 , DP-2 .3P-3 MAX 110=UNITS MAX.TWO MAK.ONE EXISTING PER ACRE 6-STORY 6-STORY MULTI-FAMILY LAB SLOGS. LAB BLDG. A GARAGE RESIDENTIAL (360,000 SF (180,000 SF) x. (535 UNITS) TOTAL) W/SHARED PARKING IN DP-2 a • NOTE: NOTE: GARAGE NOT MAX 30%LOT MAX.ONE DP-4 -- A COVERAGE IF 1-STORY 6-STORY BLDG: NOTE: .MAX.TWO PART AETAIL(65,000 SF) IF OFFICE , MAX,ONE_ (120,000SF) 6-STORY BLDG. 6-STORY IF OFFICE LAB BLDGS. (120.000 SF) (360,000 SF WITH NEW TOTAL) PARKING GARAGE SUPPORTED BY LEGEND: EXIST.PARKING GARAGE R RETAIL NOTE: MAX.TWO L6-STORY SLOGS. LAB IF OFFICE (300,000 SF) WITH NEW 2-3 STORY 0 PARKING GARAGE OFFICE P PARKING GARAGE M F MULTI-FAMILY - — — PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS Conceptual Development Plan The Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B is comprised of two somewhat distinct parts. The ROFO area makes up the northern portion of the property along 8thAvenue, has been identified as surplus by Boeing operations, and is available for near-term redevelopment. The Boeing Remainder makes up the southern portion of the Sub-District, and contains 660,000 square feet of existing office space with re-use potential and approximately 12.85 acres of land with future redevelopment potential. ROFO Area Boeing recognizes that high-quality retail development is essential to the successful transition of the area from its industrial roots to the City's vision for the Urban Center- North. Harvest Partners and the City are both committed to ensuring that the development at Lakeshore Landing is well-designed and initiates redevelopment of a quality and at a scale which is consistent with the City's long-term vision for the area. As planning for Lakeshore Landing has progressed, the land south of 8th has been identified as an important component of the overall project. The area, known as the ROFO portion of Sub-District 1-B, has been illustrated within this Conceptual Plan as an integral part of the retail development planned to the North. The ROFO portion of the Sub-District is envisioned to contain a large format "destination"retailer located along Logan Avenue, with supporting retail shops space concentrated along both sides of Park Avenue. Generally, the large format retail development(users with footprints of 50,000 square feet or larger, and building heights up to 45 feet) is planned to occur along 8th and Logan, facing eastward toward Park Avenue. The supporting retail shops space would include a mixture of medium format retailers (ranging between 10,000 and 50,000 square feet in area, with building heights up to 40 feet) and some component of smaller, specialty retail shops overlooking Park Avenue. The Plan anticipates pedestrian connections to occur internally within the site both east toward Park Avenue, and south toward 6th Avenue. Vehicle access would occur off of Park Avenue, with loading and delivery functions relying upon Garden Avenue and an internal service road running along the southern edge of the ROFO property line. At a maximum lot coverage ratio of 30%, the ROFO site could accommodate up to 270,000 square feet of retail space. Harvest's current planning anticipates a total of 225,000 to 230,000 square feet, comprised of a 135,000— 140,000 square-foot large format retailer located along Logan, and 85,000 to 90,000 square-feet of shops space. Parking is located in well-organized surface parking lots, with primary pedestrian entrances facing inward or directed toward Park Avenue. A small portion of the site, containing a data hub for the Boeing Plant, needs to be retained by Boeing for the foreseeable future. It can be accommodated along the Page 5 of 9 October 3,2005 southern portion of a mid-block parking field without having a negative impact on the surrounding retail uses. Summary Redevelopment of the ROFO parcel as envisioned within this Conceptual Plan meets many of the City's vision and policy statements for the Urban Center-North, which call for"retail integrated into pedestrian-oriented shopping districts." This site is located within District 1, where the City identifies its first objective as follows: "Create a major commercial/retail district developed with uses that add significantly to Renton's retail tax base,provide additional employment opportunities within the City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering place within the community." Boeing Remainder This portion of the plan is significantly influenced by the presence of four, 1980s-vintage office buildings that are located throughout(the 10-13, 10-16, 10-18 and 10-20 buildings). Each structure is 5—6 stories in height, ranging between 160,000 and 170,000 square feet. Parking is accommodated in separate, structured garages and in surrounding surface lots, at an overall ratio of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet. Boeing currently utilizes these four buildings and anticipates no near-term changes that would result in significant rehab or sale of the structures. In addition to the existing office buildings, there is also a 1960s-vintage lab building, known as the 10-71 building, located along Logan Avenue. Although the condition of the building and the planned widening of Logan Avenue may impact its potential re-use, Boeing and the City are interested in exploring viable adaptive re-use opportunities. To illustrate the potential capacity for redevelopment within the Conceptual Plan, the 10-71 building has been assumed to be demolished, creating a 4.9-acre development parcel between Logan Avenue and the 10-20 building(DP 1). However, Boeing would like to retain the flexibility of considering either re-use of the existing structure or redevelopment in the future. We have assumed that the existing office buildings remain,but could be supported in the future by parking at a market-driven ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet, rather than at Boeing's more conservative rate. As a result, surplus parking stalls exist within the three existing parking garages, and three additional development parcels are created: a 3.9-acre site between the 10-18 and 10-20 buildings (DP2); a 1.8-acre site on the west side of Park Avenue north of 6th (DP3); and, a 2.2-acre site on the west side of Garden Avenue north of 6th(DP4). Page 6 of 9 October 3,2005 DP1 This 4.9-acre parcel is located along Logan Avenue, immediately south of the ROFO property. Fronting on 6th Avenue, it is also adjacent to the 10-20 office building and associated parking structure. Given its location and near-term redevelopment potential, the Plan envisions its redevelopment as either a mid-rise, multifamily project or, potentially, a retail development ancillary to that anticipated on the ROFO piece. If, instead, the existing building were re-used,it is envisioned that it would be of interest either as a cost-effective research and development or contract manufacturing facility. With the demolition of the existing structure, the DP-1 site could support a significant multi-family project, either incorporated in one or more stories above ground-floor retailers, or developed at higher densities as a single use project. A five- to six-story residential project, developed at densities of 110 units per acre, would be both consistent with the residential development currently planned at Lakeshore Landing and compatible with the surrounding uses. At this higher density, approximately 535 units could be sited on DP1. Alternately,redevelopment of the DP1 parcel could accommodate up to 65,000 square feet of retail space at a 30% lot coverage ratio, taking the form of additional medium- format and small, specialty shops space backing up against Logan. Although access would most likely occur off of 6thAvenue,the development of DP 1 could be integrated with the larger retail development occurring on the ROFO parcel. DP2 and DP4 These two parcels are both infill opportunities that exist when parking requirements for the existing office buildings are reduced. Currently underutilized and serving for the most part as overflow parking areas for Boeing employees, the Plan envisions their redevelopment with 6-story office or lab buildings, consistent with the current development pattern. In some instances where new lab development is planned, surplus parking within existing garages could fully support new development, and allow for the creation of new,private open spaces or campus greens within the neighborhood. In order to create this surplus parking opportunity, the Plan assumes either that the four existing Boeing office buildings are sold to other users with market-based parking requirements or that Boeing provides new parking areas on the Plant to accommodate its employees. The Conceptual Plan illustrates the potential redevelopment of each of these parcels with laboratory uses, resulting in approximately 720,000 square feet of new space in four separate structures. Both DP2 and DP4 could accommodate two, 6-story structures containing 180,000 square feet each. A new 2- to 3-story parking garage would be constructed between the new buildings on DP2, and the additional parking needs would be provided by ear-marking a portion of the stalls within the 10-20 parking garage. On Page 7 of 9 October 3,2005 toe `1110 DP4, sufficient surplus parking exists within the existing 10-18 parking garage that no new parking would need to be constructed in this location. Alternately, either DP2 or DP4 could also be redeveloped with new office uses. Given the greater parking requirement for office space (3.5/1,000)when compared to lab space (1/1,000), less development is able to be accommodated on the parcels. On DP2, a single, 6-story structure would be developed, containing 120,000 square feet. New structured parking would be developed behind. On DP4, approximately 300,000 square feet could be constructed in two, 6-story buildings, with all parking still provided within the existing 10-18 building garage. DP3 This parcel is located just south of the 10-18 office building, at the corner of 6th and Park Avenues. The Plan envisions the development of this parcel with new lab or office uses, in both cases housed within a single 6-story structure. If developed as lab space,the building could contain approximately 180,000 square feet, supported by dedicated parking stalls within a new,multi-user garage constructed on DP2. If developed as office space, a building of approximately 120,000 square feet could be constructed on site, with parking either provided in a new garage on DP3 or accommodated by providing additional parking levels within a DP2 garage. Alternately, the DP3 parcel could accommodate up to 24,000 square feet of neighborhood retail space, fronting on Park Avenue and offering amenities to the surrounding workers and residents. Although no redevelopment of the land on the other side of Park Avenue is envisioned as part of this Conceptual Plan, redevelopment of DP3 could also lead to other improvements along Park Avenue at key intersections. It is envisioned that, if developed with retail uses, DP3 would begin to meet the increased demands for amenities and services that redevelopment along the 6th Avenue corridor would require. Summary Redevelopment as illustrated within this Conceptual Plan would be consistent with the City's Urban Center-North vision and long-range planning policies, creating a vibrant, mixed-use corridor on the north side of 6th Avenue and along Park, with mid-rise buildings fronting the streets and structured parking behind. If new development took the form of multi-family and laboratory space, the corridor would contain a total 535 new multi-family units and 900,000 square feet of new lab space at full build-out. This new mix of uses would be at a scale consistent with the 660,000 square feet of existing office space already located in the corridor. Page 8 of 9 October 3,2005 3 Economic Benefit Analysis Summary Boeing's Conceptual Redevelopment Plan for Sub-District 1-B seeks to both allow for the near-term redevelopment of Boeing's underutilized assets while advocating for a mix of uses that significantly improves the City's tax and employment base. Two economic benefit analyses (Exhibit 4)have been completed to support this submittal, demonstrating the potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by: (1) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the ROFO portion of the Sub-District(beginning in 2007); and (2) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the Boeing Remainder (beginning in 2007 for DP 1 and in 2016 for DP 2—DP 4). The economic benefits to the City of Renton associated with the redevelopment of the ROFO portion of the site can be summarized as follows: • By 2008 (project stabilization), it is estimated that over 1,061 jobs would be created in the City of Renton alone; of this job total, 859 direct jobs would be located within the development and 202 would be indirect City jobs; • The City is estimated to gain one-time revenues of nearly$667,000 during redevelopment of the parcels; • The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax revenues of nearly$856,000, beginning in 2008. The economic benefits to the City of Renton associated with the redevelopment of the Boeing Remainder portion of the site(DP 1 —4) can be summarized as follows: • By 2013 (project stabilization), it is estimated that over 2,100 jobs would be created in the City of Renton alone if this portion were developed with multifamily and lab uses as illustrated on the Conceptual Plan; of this job total, 1,700 direct jobs would be located within new buildings and 400 would be indirect City jobs; • Under this same set of land use assumptions, the City is estimated to gain one- time revenues of more than $6.2 million during redevelopment of the parcels; • The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax revenues of nearly$2.3 million,beginning in 2013. Page 9 of 9 October 3,2005 . . .. _ l' ; ..- —• • \. . — ....,,-. .. _ . .. .... ._., ... .... _. ._ „.. ..... . oil' _ 1 - III ,,,- - --- , ..„ ._ ... ._ ... .... ._. .. „ .. ... .... .... ... .... ..._ , •_ . . 2 ......---.'.—• -..-. a- „ . . .. _.. ...„• s'.. :"..... ' . ' -- .... _. ... . ..... . , AA. • ., . fe% .0,- viiv ..,...:v,,• Q. . „... . ..... .... . ._-... _ _.. .... ... ... ,.. _ .....__-„,-- .' 1111\. s 1 ,e01- Ill - •' Illigi ( 1 . ) .. .' IP' . ..: " .,,,,,,,:‘,dr,:.:...: ,A .. 1 — ....':(9ir:P1. 71;,-.1-T.!:',II'iq lilt: , ;.. . - - ' .,,,.•0: ii,-:.11414111m irafattfi iol ..,,,,,,,!ir.O.:•'.i.:.•nriii:7:+:"414.zi Nialarilii,':F.,:••-,i',. , •+:. . ',e,...:;ki141.1iIii 4.4::iiKil.i::::W9' •','''''"''''' '' ‘I0 Oc i; •• !?•':4i•aii:''' '.:::Iiir.iP1144..!'!4• -V.iiii,j;;`'Xialq ..•,..r.i.i:i4,-•.H.,r''fi'M'ir'•,!'!' ...‘ iir,..iii:oar:an- .. ; . ... , .41',.1:•J.,,,t02,;:.:41P:.14...N...,'-i..-1W.' ...1,4,..1,.,.,T,.11,,,.vi,k,.•..a.—i;1 , , -g.,. ,:70-1pliL6igL•fir,,i&. ,. .ith,, ztc-r•ibTf..i!ii:'-liiniki. 0 . . • • ..,:,,:41,,111•:!,:illir...;$ALK..:.•ii,:if:Pr.iiliiiet,t, •••...•........: :•:.:::':::.'" ..L 4.:14,41:',i•00.11rAP,ilikt.S....2,1.111,li ,P,::t.i.iiii:Iiif•j5-..'n1.:'''i-V,,. Ir i'.., , ., , , .•.ir!...:,.10.$4.41.k.iimk,14,,,,,s,,I , . .X ..,, r,,, ,.1...ifi '..11. .:, ,-,..,.4.,..il,.. - . .......•i.1-.,.-9.0..1.4,,.4 7, ..., • i:;:.. .m. . ,....,. ,.,t,... , -, . .--..-.veg._ • . „. . Sub-District .. .,......:,2,::„.,,„:.„,„.........:,....„....,,. ,,..., .,.......„....". , ,,i..„,,,,„:„.F:,..„...,,„„L,.,..t_...............• ..:_,-,., :„.0,&„,,,,„.,... . :.,,- .A., . :,,si:pogrpetAlialiwiloltAlei,: id,:ili. ,,vagAgliitn.q..:A A ,.-. . , . . ..,:......„,„„..._,„,,,,,_,,,••,„....„,-,,.. ..„ .. irlipicA.'iiirlirmiiLTV,a.ii1Pq.... h.- • ,TV:i,,,ijitg7410411'Li."...• '1 .'..4;.. ,"451 1 ryieir''.'',411 4 ••:2'41 tri4,47PITC.lititearie. •.., 0.. 14. tn.,1,L :ta•NiStivi 'Y. ' !..,:cmt ir.: i..r• , .. sil..,lik.,_!fl, ..71.;12, kilw-nrEs.:.-vt..;ttvc.e.,,,,,,....,.,,,, ,. •:::41: -'''•,...:.. t. • . .. ]i'!'..i:.ii..,7• ;:':.,ti I!'.:ALT,4.''''..!:''....;iiiir.l",.41'T.:;li'':'•Aieii.:-:RNi.d -.. f. :1';:•I' '' . . ' . ".'':......r.=•k,;: i iFigi A:.:,4.A':7..i',littl .'.'.1:`..,NiF41,!E t •.. -1!,PliftPliqk;"1"111F"i4iittii I • ' .• 4 7::.4;'iit„iE.1,riiirOihi:00ir'!?#Aqi...44 0 :1`.1ir...1 i-- • • ,Lr L.'!1••4'4,1i941,9teiiiNt;:keri:,,,h,.., ''-," '.",!, AiEir.:i.tii:a•. U'41 2•'/ErIZ414:Vrtiit"-•::::.:''`-.!,''. .--"'''''-1Viiiir,,N.'''t i• , ,tr r'y 1..ip,a44-.ffiE!-;:e',i•r:!-1?.'....,7.im•,?;',4,rz.11,,,.... ••'.if-.7.1.9. ... .:Wl`g4irdit::::!-;4;:!A ir,' ,...i7,•:.I r14.4.:. . •:. '.''a r: *, f', .• Sub-District , , _,,,::.. :TiF.!:-F.,:,,!,Kr.:iiiT,N57 n:5..47.3,ti,...PI, A:Alta...,, •... .... .1 - . , ,t,...'.,-,,I,V!'itts•i;g.!Iriti.:...;!.-!!:,1;i:::.!'.7::'!..! i't14A''''! .. -...:•.. .:7:.:,•:',..4!'.)....."-..:2•2:77 '''.'•...,,',F, •••""'-•:!!'4 1 th.,..:,;;ii Ili) ... :. _. .... . '..'-. . . , _'' .,,,• , x -., ..,!. •:m rr.i',,III sw,,..-: • ;.1.51,..mr.t....m...TA NM OM as aws III I.I. rillktill1:: , • . • mei ,1;.',1 el, 1 if z1.- -••• mr.*._,- P.-ai: ,.... .., ,,•I •• um - au->' -- NTs r: Ill!!iiri.i,.!.!..„iii.,,ip•e... . , :4.•:: •• .. \ 12,. • ' -: .. 'V.Ef'.''a'a 11:P r a..-1:.:.,::::Ifttr. '''•',. S t be .., ... , . . . : ......... -.a ... . _ . .,...-:: „.„.: ,, ..-- -r....i, II n , „,.. , ,,„: , „,L... ..,..,.. , . 111.11 nas lals if•-' — mos_-,.. son mill I At/ II „ ..... ....NO 1111111.1111 IM IMO MN MI MIMI NM MI/11 II i . , MIN M INN 1 NU M no am 1111111.1, MIMI Min n' , , MN MI I I 3 I ___"" ___,--- j N Lit.h St. , / if -' I " , , . . ....MI MI MN 1•11 MIN 7_-__ MI NM - le 1,1 \iii11117/ ...H. 1•0 MI IIIM OM MN \ , ins nni LI''.2 ----• a--: Ca rall "nil.. 111111 , • •, Pm me --— ma - ' — MC 4..7 MI 1.1 I= >CU imilillir, Cr.sra — 11/ ..mrt qj all > INN .mime FpA .. .6 =a --c 'Inc rat-2 wail in, - min Z...., 111•14-4 '.., A , . -, ... .. .... —— ----- !ma= mammals/ :17— '' '''' II oni":;11 sisionio. ,....._,rLi im.....:;ssio ..=.710....mm........,mbiew _____7,1,..11, :ims......i..,...,7 gr.ril Fiq 0414 MI -------_. Air-port Way , 0 •\ \ 1 ......., me ..-, .0 .iii... • ila . lir ..... 4 ,iv- ow 41_,41 =TEED I I= = ihL... . IP:ie am Em ii= go m imm • . . • . : slim - Urban Center North District Sub-areas ,. . Districts Subject to Conceptual Plan Approval Note:District boundaries include dedicated R-O-W 1 3,,. . • Economich,DeveA to.pment,Neighborhoods and Strait&Planning IQ G.DCI R08•60 1.4"111) ExtiI • i bit , , ,.., * 13 Kintanbcr 2003