Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Title IV Development Regs - Revision Process (6/24/2002)
a r\ k i, c; (Q... Z X nL c - m _ m :F15 _• L .. .ac 0 (0.L.. C C l0 > C) Taao > aci3 � � vm �'� 3LLW""cq sw� g' - 112 rn- m a� m. o U O c m or_ O `� m m=Q no,n�, coa U N mCNc VN _ pOrcS E—L $ N m «-6 CAOM CA 7N:r� E� - m. E C C C'a V' CV a V a1 a L t _0. ro L p c L m c NL c11��,, C c V N fffffQQQQQQW�����11i11i fl.l0 0 a -.c O V N pyV- -2-- ct 5Cr Q2ali o cv U y V V ,...0 -• O fd i cE y O N V 0 O m C es OOpt °Y m c o�O= m o ro n m• as 2Z mL a o >• Q =c m aaa 2 cLE cUc •CNTO-Cco 20 aB-- mo . aia)° oa = m 3,c oa m..:EmU 2 c0 \ c__ �/o c c o \ ` I 4 rn c o CD o v C ftS -0 '°. A% c O c s a) :° 3 N -� -E Ce t _c 2 o c m o m- O c 75 a0i ` _ m -ma as 45 (.0 .0. 0 13 N 0 00 a) O O :d z"; U cs Tani me a) v . c o • m '.- � -0Y O c ) 0 � U) 0 Z J M a°)) ° c0 O (Oj 3 o U) ' y _c Q O m o : c M E N . Y ,-� °\00 , a o E rn O - O N U Q N . O fl +L. 0 0 C y a) t U O �j 7 L J C O 3 >,O CC 3XC cmmo0- � � c0 112 � � z (0 ti 4. m m ;t) 'o .n a) a a cnw C � � .0 a; wot v) K. Y 0) wc° m a. o 0 LL 0 H °' a) csw o co m w q 3 c ~ O 3 � rn I . -C N (0 r 'p T N •C / N ru Q a) O O O O t a w 0. / ��^^�� Q U O E °) 0_ OV v .c c0 O :.. ma) t O N y t• w E E —.cO. Ca O. E o ,o a) C LL Q >, 3 0) 0cy03 -- TS c m o(13 o E C 'n 3 us -O O o 4- X L 'O Lfie ogaa U a) c 0 0 0 3 0 U O 4 _l k O tmL- m X F- a) "I Yc � oc c = �ow o (o s O a oi 43 mot caw c -c O ov g. c) co " :% 0 >, oca) YmOa) F- J c .., cfl cp Z. CD 0 CD m ai ao °)a31- CI nC o c cEoCo E 0 sio��y • Q ®°.,'• Is= >,O c c -a W 7 Z cO0) Z vCOi °000°.0 � /iB111111�1���� J -C a) 7 a) C) O a ~ Cl) C U .0 a) O 0 CO o) O. 0 ) 0 N ♦- (0 F- < F- J Cl) Of_ f_. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 7 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTERS 4-8 AND 4-9 OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO IMPLEMENT RCW 36.70A.470 GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENT CYCLES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-8-080.G of Chapter 8, Permits—General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment "A." SECTION II. Type X—Land Use Permits, of Section 4-8-080.H of Chapter 8, Permits—General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment "B." SECTION III. A new Section, 4-9-025, of Chapter 9,Permits— Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby added, to read as follows: 4-9-025 TITLE 4 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVISION PROCESS A. PURPOSE In accordance with RCW 36.70A.470, a summary containing written comments on suggested development regulation amendments shall be coordinated by the Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning (EDNSP). The text revision 1 ' 1 err' ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 7 5 process is the means either to suggest a change or to identify a deficiency, or both, in the development regulations. For the purposes of this section, "deficiency" refers to the absence of required or potentially desirable contents of the development regulations. A deficiency does not refer to whether a development regulation addresses a project's probable specific adverse environmental impacts that could be mitigated in the project review process. B. APPLICABILITY Title 4 development regulation amendment proposals will be processed in accordance with this section, unless specifically exempted below. Any interested party, including applicants, citizens, and government agencies, may submit items to the Title 4 Development Regulation amendment process. Comprehensive Plan amendments and Rezones are treated through separate processes. C. EXEMPTION Imperative Title 4 amendments designated by the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission, or City management staff may be given a higher priority and processed outside of the annual Title 4 amendment process outlined in this section. D. AUTHORITY The Planning Manager of EDNSP shall coordinate the annual Title 4 development regulation amendment process. E. PROCESS 1. All proposed amendments relating to Title 4 development regulations shall be reviewed by EDNSP and considered for an amendment to Title 4 development regulations. 2. The deadline for submitting proposed amendments is December 15 for consideration in the amendment process for the following year. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 7 5 3. By the first business day of May, the EDNSP Department shall issue a staff report response to all proposed amendments. Responses shall include a recommendation indicating whether or not the proposed amendment(s) are to be included in that year's recommended Title 4 development regulation update. If the proposed changes will not be included in the next transmittal to Council, EDNSP shall indicate the reason(s) why, and shall inform the proponent that they may petition the Council during the review process. 4. By the first business day of May, EDNSP shall forward to the Council a report including all proposed amendments and comments with a staff response. 5. Upon receipt of the Title 4 development regulation amendment report,the City Clerk's Office shall mail written notice to all proponents of amendment requests containing the Council review process for the current year, and informing proponents that they may petition the Council to consider amendment proposals that were not recommended. This notice shall include the schedule of dates for public hearings, committee meetings, and any other opportunities for public testimony on the current year's Title 4 development regulations update. 6. Comments relating to Title 4 development regulations shall be reviewed by the appropriate City departments. Those that also require a Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be forwarded to EDNSP and considered for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RMC 4-9-020. 7. Title 4 amendment proposals that are rejected by the City shall not be reconsidered, unless a compelling case for changed circumstances can be made, for a period of two years. Proponents of Title 4 amendment proposals shall be notified in writing, once the status of the proposal is resolved. 3 . NW *if ORDINANCE NO. 4975 F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A City of Renton Submittal Form shall be submitted for a Title 4 development regulation amendment in order to be formally considered. G. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD See RMC 4-8-080.H, and RMC 4-8-090. The timeline for notifying the public of proposed Development Regulation amendments shall be as described in the Type X—Land Use Permits table of RMC 4-8-080.H, unless Planning Commission review is deemed to be unnecessary. In that case,the timeline for the proposed Development Regulation amendment will be governed by Type IX permits. SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of July , 2002. 0-h 144-J. W& Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1st day of July , 2002. c7:044,,e.4"...0". Jes anner, Mayor Ap ed as to form: 67g Cwu-r.o tn.t_P Lawrence J. Warr , City Attorney Date of Publication: 7/5/2002 (summary) ORD.997:6/13/02:ma 4 ORDINANCE NO. 4975 ATTACHMENT "A" �-► G. LAND USE PERMIT PROCEDURES: LL z O O G -1 Q O w vz o 2 a a V ZO w U" -- z 0 Q LL,UU 2 rez EtQ Luz U aO sea- wQm w < a. O LAND USE PERMITS TYPE I Building and Grading Permits' No No No Staff HE CC SC Business Licenses for Home No No No Staff HE CC SC Occupations (no customer visits/deliveries) Deferrals No No No Staff HE CC SC Lot Line Adjustments No No No Staff HE CC SC Minor Modification to Previously No No No Staff HE CC SC Approved Site Plan (<10%) Modifications, Deviations, Alternates of No No No Staff HE CC SC Various Code Standards2 Public Art Exemption Certificate No No No Staff HE CC SC Routine Vegetation Management Permits No No No Staff HE CC SC (SEPA exempt) Shoreline Exemptions No No No Staff HE CC SC Special Fence Permits No No No Staff HE CC SC Waivers2 No No No Staff HE CC SC TYPE II Business Licenses for Home Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Occupations (with customer visits/deliveries) Conditional Approval Permit Yes No No Staff HE CC SC (nonconforming structures) Short Plats—4 Lots or Less (SEPA Yes No No Staff HE CC SC exempt) Site Plan Review (administrative) for Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Secondary Uses (SEPA exempt) 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4975 ATTACHMENT "A" *40800 Temporary Use Permits (SEPA exempt) Yes3 No No Staff CC CC SC Temporary Emergency Wetland Permit Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Variances, Administrative Yes No No Staff HE CC SC TYPE III" Binding Site Plans Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Conditional Use Permit (administrative) Yes No No Staff HE CC SC with Environmental Review Development Permit (special flood Yes No No Staff HE CC SC hazard) Environmental Reviews Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Site Plan Review (administrative) with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review Shoreline Permit Yes No No Staff DOE CC SC Short Plats—4 Lots or Less, with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review Temporary Use Permits (subject to Yes No No Staff HE CC SC SEPA) Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes No No Staff HE CC SC with any of the above TYPE IV" Variances, Board of Adjustment (and Yes NA BOA BOA SC building permits submitted in conjunction with above) TYPE V Conditional Approval Permit Yes Staff HE HE CC SC (nonconforming uses) Request for Extension of Amortization Yes NA HE HE NA CC SC Period of Adult Use (Amd. Ord. 4827, 1-24-2000) TYPE VI' Bulk Storage Special Permit Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Conditional Use Permit (Hearing Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Examiner) Fill and Grade Permit, Special Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Master Site Plan Approval (overall plan) Yes Staff HE HE CC SC 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4975 ATTACHMENT "A" Mobile Home Parks, Preliminary and Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Final Shoreline Conditional Use Permit6 Yes Staff HE DOE, SHB HE Shoreline Variances Yes Staff HE DOE, SHB HE Short Plats— 5 to 9 Lots Yes Staff HE HE CC Site Plan Review (Hearing Examiner) Yes Staff HE HE CC with Environmental Review Special Permits Yes Staff HE HE CC Variances (associated with Hearing Yes Staff HE HE CC Examiner land use review) Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes Staff HE HE CC with any of the above Environmental Review Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Site Plan Review (administrative) with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review TYPE VII4 Preliminary Plats— 10 Lots or More Yes Staff, HE CC SC HE Planned Unit Developments (preliminary Yes Staff, HE CC SC and final) HE Rezones (site-specific, not associated Yes Staff, HE CC SC with a Comprehensive Plan amendment) HE Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes Staff, HE CC SC SC with any of the above HE TYPE VIII4 Final Plats No Staff NA CC SC Street Vacations Yes Staff CC CC SC TYPE IX4 Development Regulation Text Yes Staff CC CC SC Amendments— Except Those Referred to Planning Commission 3 ORDINANCE NO. 4975 ATTACHMENT "A" TYPE X4 Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Yes Staff, PC, CC SC Amendments PC CC Rezones with Associated Yes Staff, PC, CC SC Comprehensive Plan Map or Text PC CC Amendments Development Regulation Text Yes Staff, PC, CC SC Amendments Referred to Planning PC CC Commission TYPE XI Reserved for Annexations 4 O 4-•i U •O V) Q a W U U V) GL) aci -° CJ — x la. .o 4.+ U • oo dar U Q Pm U v x •• G) x •° z •i—i 04.° 0 C� s E ^� far p O el 0 a4 CI) on.o no o en . 5 •~ � ' — a ;1•+ U 4) °' 2 61 cii E J E•I N LA U p , a) a) a • z ' . 2 w po z "0 E •; Qxz 3 =a. o 0 z rd U CI .14 z W �, C • o za •MI y o '" •0 0 a o H E-+ 1 .� v� U . a F ,I. E = .-Et •5 �e a) pi Vs � � WFQ v •E. ii©� a) — Pe N v) V . 'O a x y ENO bil a) UIH x c -d ed o m o - a Q a.) eth+i .7a) ca a c v - a s O + •O g i t . a. N a., cc: O O c . a) Q. c� V) is U F" a °' x cs 'O O 0 Ca .o N F.' ?) oD N c o E O cd V .r.n EHWU �' I iIIIiI N Q. , =U 0L5 ¢ ¢F ry • • • — N M 'r July 1,2002 *r Renton City Council Minutes `""` Page 264 SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that pictures of the art be displayed at the July 8th Council meeting. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3577 A resolution was read approving the McTighe(also known as Honeybrooke) Plat: McTighe(Honeybrooke), Final Plat consisting of approximately 4.67 acres located in the vicinity of NE NE 4th PI &Ilwaco Ave NE 4th Pl. and Ilwaco Ave. NE(FP-02-016). MOVED BY KEOLKER- (FP-02-016) WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3578 A resolution was read updating the City's Six-Year Transportation Transportation: Six-Year TIP Improvement Program(TIP), 2003—2008. MOVED BY PERSSON, (2003-2008) SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3579 A resolution was read rescinding a development agreement dated January 4, Development Services: Boeing 2001, between The Boeing Company and the City of Renton, and authorizing Longacres Office Park the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an updated development agreement with Development Agreement The Boeing Company for future development of Longacres Office Park. Yk1/4 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. • The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4975 An ordinance was read amending Chapters 4-8 and 4-9 of Title IV Planning: Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code to implement RCW (Revised Code of Development Regulation Washington) 36.70A.470 governing development regulation amendment cycles. Revision Process MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4976 An ordinance was read relating to the waterworks utility of the City, including Finance: Bond Issuance,Water the sewerage system as a part thereof; providing for the issuance of &Sewer Projects $11,980,000 aggregate principal amount of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 2002, of the City for the purpose of obtaining the funds with which to pay the costs of carrying out certain capital improvements of the waterworks utility; fixing the date,form,denominations, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; providing for bond insurance; and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to D.A. Davidson&Co., Seattle, Washington. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Budget: 2002 Amendment, COUNCIL INSTRUCT ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE AN Additional Police&Fire ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING AT THE JULY 8, 2002, COUNCIL Department Positions MEETING ADDING TWO STAFF POSITIONS: AN EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND A SECRETARY 1 TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.* Councilman Parker expressed his preference for adding the evidence technician and crime analyst positions as those positions are part of the long-range forecast '+► `ati June 24,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 247 with all valid local laws, franchise requirements and agreements consistent with applicable Federal and State law; and that the Franchise Authority's consent to the transactions shall not be construed to constitute a waiver or release of any rights the Franchise Authority has under the franchise, whether those rights arise before or after the change in control to AT&T Comcast. The Committee recommended that the City Council authorize adoption of the resolution. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3575 A resolution was read consenting to a change of control of TCI Cablevision of City Clerk: AT&T Broadband Washington, Inc., also known as AT&T Broadband, from AT&T Corporation &Comcast Corporation Cable to AT&T Comcast Corporation. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY TV Franchise Merger CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3576 A resolution was read authorizing the temporary closure of SW 7th St., Lind Streets: Temporary Closures Ave. SW at SW 40th St., Mill Ave. S. at Houser Way S., and Bronson Way N. for Railroad Grade Crossing at Houser Way S., for a period of seven days (consecutive or non-consecutive) Reconstruction between July 10 and September 30, 2002, for Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) to replace six existing railroad crossings with concrete. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 7/1/2002 for second and final reading: Planning: Title IV An ordinance was read amending Chapters 4-8 and 4-9 of Title IV Development Regulation (Development Regulations) of City Code to implement RCW (Revised Code of Revision Process Washington) 36.70A.470 governing development regulation amendment cycles. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 7/1/2002. CARRIED. Finance: Bond Issuance, Water An ordinance was read relating to the waterworks utility of the City, including & Sewer Projects the sewerage system as a part thereof; providing for the issuance of $12,150,000 aggregate principal amount of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 2002, of the City for the purpose of obtaining funds with which to pay the costs of carrying out certain capital improvements of the waterworks utility; fixing the date, form, denominations, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; providing for bond insurance; and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to D.A. Davidson & Co., of Seattle, Washington. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RaER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 7/1/2002. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance #4974 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 8, Permits and Decisions, of Title IV Development Services: Permit (Development Regulations) of City Code by providing for a 120-day time goal Review Process, 120-Day Goal to process permits after the date of the letter of completeness, except for Exemptions appeals, which may take more time. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Jurte 24,2002 Nu." Renton City Council Minutes Page 240 Ms. Nishihira reported that the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) requires developmentagreements to undergo environmental review; therefore, the City's Environmental Review Committee(EIS) issued an addendum to the 1995 EIS on May 14,2002. In conclusion, she stated that staff recommends approval of the proposed development agreement and adoption of the enacting resolution. Audience comment was invited, there being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See below for Planning&Development Committee report regarding this matter.) Advancement to Planning & MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL Development Committee SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING& Report DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee report recommending concurrence with the recommendation of the Development Services: Boeing administration to approve the Boeing Longacres Office Park(LOP) Longacres Office Park Development Agreement II in order to establish applicable development Development Agreement regulations including a vesting framework and other restrictions, for future development of the Boeing LOP. The Committee recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the development agreement. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Title IV This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Development Regulation accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Revision Process to consider the proposed amendment to City Code Title IV Development Regulations by adding an annual Development Regulation Revision Process. Gil Cerise, Senior Planner,explained that the revision process is required by State law under the Growth Management Act. The statute requires cities and counties to include within their development regulations a procedure for any interested person to suggest development regulation amendments. Cities are also required to place suggested amendments on prioritized lists for annual consideration. Mr. Cerise stated that the annual process proposed by staff, which is modeled on the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, adds a new City Code Section to Chapter 9,Title IV and allows for an exemption process for high priority Code amendments. Continuing,Mr. Cerise reviewed the proposed timeline for the revision process, noting that the deadline to submit amendment proposals is December 15. The following May, staff reports to Council on the proposals and Council may refer the items to the Planning Commission or to the Planning&Development Committee. He explained that the submittal requirements are simple and there is no fee required. Mr. Cerise stated that if an amendment proposal is rejected, the proponent shall be informed in writing, and the rejected proposal may not be re-submitted for a period of two years unless a compelling case for changed circumstances can be made. He also pointed out that the process allows for exemptions for high priority Code amendments. In conclusion, Mr. Cerise stated that staff recommends that Council adopt the Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process. June 24,2002 Renton City Council Minutes ,""i Page 241 Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry, Mr. Cerise explained that the proposed revision process follows the same deadlines as the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked that the proposed ordinance be revised on page 3, no. 5, to indicate that the City Clerk shall mail written notice to all proponents of amendment requests, instead of the Council. Audience comment was invited, there being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 247 for ordinance.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2002 and beyond. Items noted included: * A daytime picnic and an evening fireworks display will set the stage for the City's 4th of July Celebration. A picnic,complete with food,fun, and entertainment, will be held from 11:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and the fireworks display will begin at 10:15 p.m. * The Kidd Valley Summer Concert series will provide free entertainment at Coulon Beach Memorial Park starting at 7:00 p.m. every Wednesday through August 14th. * The City's free summer lunch program, which provides children ages one to eighteen with one well-balanced meal each weekday, started today at three Renton sites. For more information, call 425-430-6650. Sound Transit: HOV Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman gave a Improvement Projects, briefing on the negotiations with Sound Transit regarding a perpetual easement Perpetual Easement for BNSF that has been requested for a portion of property owned by the City of Renton Railroad on the east side of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)railroad tracks. He reviewed Sound Move's proposed improvements for the Renton area, which have changed significantly from 1996 to now. The original proposed improvements included two HOV direct access interchanges at an estimated cost of$85 million (one at the north side, in the vicinity of Park Ave. N., and one at the south side, in the vicinity of Talbot Rd. S.), and four express bus routes. Mr. Zimmerman reported on the current situation which now includes three of the four bus routes,no south-side interchange, and the north-side interchange has continued to increase in cost to an estimated $160 million. Indicating that Sound Transit would like to incorporate the north-side interchange into the I- 405 Corridor Program, he noted that funding for the I-405 Corridor is questionable. Mr. Zimmerman stated that the tax revenue programmed for Renton projects should be used in Renton even if the interchange cannot be built; therefore, the City suggested a contingency plan be developed that lists projects eligible for funding by Sound Move. Continuing,Mr. Zimmerman said that the City has sought a commitment for a contingency plan, but so far, Sound Transit has not complied. In the meantime, Sound Transit wants the City to grant a perpetual easement on City property to BNSF for improvements which will assist in the operation of the Tukwila Community Rail Station, and enable Sound Transit to introduce a third commuter rail train. The introduction of the third train is contingent upon Proposed Title 4 Revision Process City Council Public Hearing Presentation June 24,2002 State Law Mandate • Applies to cities and counties planning under Growth Management. • Include within development regulations a procedure for any interested person to suggest development regulation amendments. • Place suggested amendments on prioritized list and considered at least annually. Annual Process Established with Exemptions Allowed • Add new code section to Chapter 9 • Similar to Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process • Exemption Process is available for high priority code amendments Proposed Title 4 Revisions to Zoning Interpretation, Use Table, Use Notes, and Related Code Amendments 1 *ow wiso Timeline • December 15-Deadline to submit amendment proposals • May-Staff Report to Council on Title 4 amendment proposals • Council may refer to Planning Commission or directly to Planning&Development Committee Submittal Requirements • Simple submittal requirements No fee -Submittal form with contact information, • Standardized form to forward submittal copies to Mayor,Council,and management staff Reconsideration • Proponents of amendment proposals that arc rejected shall be informed in writing. • A rejected proposal may not be re- submitted for a period of 2 years unless a compelling case for changed circumstances can be made: Proposed Title 4 Revisions to Zoning Interpretation, Use Table, Use Notes, and Related Code Amendments 2 ler Strriiiiia 7� Proposed Process • Meets State Law Requirements • Allows Public Participation input in Development Regulation Amendments • Standardizes Annual Process for Title 4 Updates -Ensures minor code amendments arc completed in timely manner • Allows for Exemption for High Priority Code Amendments • Proposed Title 4 Revisions to Zoning Interpretation, Use Table, Use Notes, and Related Code Amendments 3 wry •e `SY O PUBLIC HEARING HANDOUT June 24,2002, City Council Chambers,7:30 PM APPLICATION NAME: TITLE IV DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVISION PROCESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City proposes to amend Title IV Development Regulations by adding an annual Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process to Chapter 9. This process is modeled on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process that currently exists in Chapter 9 of the City Code. The proposed process is designed to: • Allow flexibility in administration, including an exemption process for high priority code amendments; • Create an annual process for managing work load and updating the development regulation code; • Allow public input into the annual development regulation process; and • Meet state law requirements. There are two options for review process: 1. Planning Commission review followed by City Council. 2. City Council review without Planning Commission input. The attached Title 4 Submittal Handout is an illustration of the type of standardized format in which code amendments will be solicited. RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process, as presented. r.► ATTACHMENT 6 CZ* Jt Submittal Form City of Renton Title 4 Development Regulation Amendments DATE OF SUBMITTAL NAME ADDRESS PHONE(including area code) CODE SECTION(S) DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE: Proponent Signature: ATTACHMENT ALL COMPLETED FORMS RECEIVED BY THE CITY WILL BE SENT TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SEE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND MAILING ADDRESS. For Department Use only: Issue No. City-Initiated Applications Only Manager's Signature Authorizing EDNSP to Process Submittal Form: City of Renton Title 4 Development Regulation Amendment Information RCW 36.70A.470 [abbreviated] Docketing means compiling and maintaining a list of suggested changes to the comprehensive plan or development regulations in a manner that will ensure such suggested changes will be considered by the city and will be available for review by the public. The City's development regulations shall include a procedure for any interested person to suggest plan or development regulation amendments. The suggested amendments shall be considered on at least an annual basis. Deficiency in a comprehensive plan or development regulation refers to the absence of required or potentially desirable contents of a comprehensive plan or development regulation. City of Renton Municipal Code contains a section on the Title 4 Development Regulation Amendment process. Please refer to RMC 4-9-025 for specific language. Forms must be mailed or submitted to: City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning Renton City Hall—6"'Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 wftwe "rim CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 24th day of June, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to be held in the seventh floor Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, to consider the following: Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process. All interested parties are invited to attend the hearing and present written or oral comments regarding the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and interpretive services for the hearing impaired will be provided upon prior notice. For information, call 425-430-6510. �• WO- Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published South County Journal June 14, 2002 Account No. 50640 June 10,2002 vase Renton City Council Minutes " Page 219 Councilman Persson explained that in order to obtain the necessary permits to complete the Oakesdale Ave. SW extension project, the City must agree to monitor and maintain the Oakesdale Phase 1 wetland. *MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Duvall Ave Transportation(Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report NE Improvements (SR-900 to regarding the Duvall Ave. NE improvements. Staff proposes to widen Duvall City Limits),TM Grant Ave. NE from two lanes to five lanes. This may include four through-lanes,a two-way left-turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lighting, landscaping,bike lanes and channelization from SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) to the northern City limit. These improvements are expected to reduce congestion and the high number of accidents. They will raise Levels of Services (LOS) towards the service standards adopted by the City in 1995 to achieve compliance with the Growth Management Act(GMA). The City of Renton has received a grant from the Transportation Improvement Board (TM) in the amount of$3,095,640, of which$684,000 is authorized for design. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the TM to accept grant funding for design, and that Council approve the resolution and all consecutive phases and subsequent elements up to and including construction of roadway. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. MOTION CARRIED. (See page 224 for resolution.) Planning &Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee report regarding the Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process. The Planning: Title IV Committee reviewed the Title IV revision process on March 1, 2002, and June Development Regulation 6, 2002. Committee members directed staff to develop an annual amendment Revision Process process that complies with State law yet allows Council the flexibility to deal with imperative issues that need immediate attention. The Committee 111 recommended that the Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process be referred to the City Attorney's office for preparation of an ordinance and that a public hearing be scheduled for June 24, 2002. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Harrington Square, Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Highlands Redevelopment, report regarding the Highlands study area implementation residential Residential Overlay District demonstration overlay within the Village Center Designation. The Committee met on June 6th to review the Harrington Square Conceptual Plan and determined that the proposed Harrington Square multi-family development is the kind of project envisioned for the Highlands redevelopment area. This project meets adopted business plan goals and the Highlands study area goals. The Committee finds that Title IV (Development Regulations) amendments will be necessary to implement projects of this type in the Highlands study area. The Committee recommended that a Title IV work program be referred to the Planning Commission for review of zoning within this designation for the following topics: • Density • Parking Standards (specifically a bedroom-based standard for multi- family housing) APPROVED BY 1 CITY COUNCIL Date 6-/0-01,00a PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 10,2002 Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process (Referred January 14, 2002) The Planning and Development Committee reviewed the Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process March 21st, 2002 and June 6th, 2002. Committee members directed staff to develop an annual amendment process that complies with state law yet allows Council the flexibility to deal with imperative issues that need immediate attention. It is recommended that the Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process be referred to the City Attorney's Office for preparation of an ordinance and that a public hearing be scheduled for June 24, 2002. thy eolker-Wheeler, Chair , ` . .w .i.WA-� . / ern '.ri 1":ce Chai --sue" ' mg Parker,Member cc: Sue Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Alex Pietsch,EDNSP Director Neil Watts,Development Services Director Docket.rpt\ Rev 01/02 bh NOW 'ormr0 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON JUN 0 3 2002 MEMORANDUM RENTON GITYCOUNGIL DATE: May 29, 2002 TO: Planning&Development Committee FROM: Gil Cerise, Senior Planne SUBJECT: Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process Background State law(RCW 36.70A.470)requires that each county and city planning under the Growth Management Act include in its development regulations a procedure for any interested person, including applicants, citizens,hearing examiners, and staff of other agencies,to suggest development regulation amendments. The suggested amendments shall be placed on a prioritized list and considered on at least an annual basis. The amendment process outlined below satisfies the state law requirements. The attached proposed code amendment entitled"4-9-025 Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process" is intended to be an outline of the process to be followed in the annual Title 4 amendment process. However,there is a great deal of flexibility allowed through the exemption process and the ability to use the Planning Commission in the review process, or go directly to the City Council with staff recommendations. Only two specific dates are laid out for applications to be submitted and for staff recommendations going to City Council. These dates are included to ensure that work programs progress,but allows flexibility in developing work programs for individual issues. Annual Process Established with Exemptions Allowed. This proposal adds a new section of code outlining an annual development regulation revision process to Chapter 9 of Title 4. The new code section allows flexibility in revising the development regulations through an exemption process(RMC 4-9-025C on attachment) which allows the City to amend Title 4 whenever there are high priority code amendments needed. Timely Notification of New Issues Planning and Development Committee previously requested a quarterly reporting of newly requested code amendments. Staff suggests that this be satisfied via an administrative procedure that requires all newly requested code amendments be copied to both the City Council and Mayor. If the Mayor or Council feels a new issue is too important to wait for the annual amendment process, then they can inform management of this fact and have the issue resolved outside of the annual amendment per the exemption process stated in RMC 4-9-025C. Timeline Outlined for Annual Amendment Process. The annual process is coordinated by the Planning Manager of EDNSP, and it is set up to coincide with the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. This will reduce workload and allow staff to develop a coordinated work program for the entire year. Example submittal forms and summary recommendation reports are included as attachments to this packet. Submittal forms will be due on December 15th of each calendar year,the same as with Comprehensive Plan \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\FINANCE\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone Amends\TITLE IV Rewrite\Docket Process\P&D Committee memo.doc\cor amendments. The draft code goes further by establishing the first of May as the latest date at which staff will forward Council a report of the proposed amendments with staff recommendations. Council shall notify parties of record and/or amendment proponents of the anticipated schedule for Council review and decision on the amendments. The annual process allows for proposed amendments to be reviewed by all appropriate city departments. If the proposed amendment requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment, it will be referred to that process with Title 4 code amendments to be developed as a result of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Rejection of Proposed Amendment. Proponents of a Title 4 development regulation amendment that is not approved shall be notified of this result. Proponents cannot resubmit for the same Title 4 amendment for a period of 2 years unless a compelling case for changed circumstances can be made. Role of the Planning Commission and City Council in Review. Currently,the Planning Commission reviews all development regulation amendments that have policy substance. Those which are considered to be procedural or minor in policy content skip the Planning Commission and go directly to the Council. The proposed code is silent about Planning Commission involvement except to say that proposed Title 4 code amendments are treated as Type X or Type IX dependent upon whether or not Planning Commission review is necessary. If the Planning Commission is involved, then the revision is treated as a Type X land use permit, to be reviewed by Planning Commission prior to the City Council. If the Planning Commission is not involved,then the revision is treated as a Type IX land use permit to be reviewed only by the City Council. cc: Sue Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Alex Pietsch,EDNSP Director Rebecca Lind,Planning Manager \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\FINANCE\EDNSP\Title IV\Multiple Zone Amends\TITLE IV Rewrite\Docket Process\P&D Committee memo.doc\cor NOW .4100. 4-9-025 TITLE 4 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVISION PROCESS A. PURPOSE In accordance with RCW 36.70A.470, a summary containing written comments on suggested development regulation amendments shall be coordinated by the Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning(EDNSP). The text revision process is the means either to suggest a change or to identify a deficiency, or both, in the development regulations. For the purposes of this section, "deficiency"refers to the absence of required or potentially desirable contents of the development regulations. A deficiency does not refer to whether a development regulation addresses a project's probable specific adverse environmental impacts that could be mitigated in the project review process. B. APPLICABILITY Title 4 development regulation amendment proposals will be processed in accordance with this section,unless specifically exempted below. Any interested party, including applicants, citizens, and government agencies,may submit items to the Title 4 Development Regulation amendment process. Comprehensive Plan amendments and Rezones are treated through separate processes. C. EXEMPTION Imperative Title 4 amendments designated by the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission, or City management staff may be given a higher priority and processed outside of the annual Title 4 amendment process outlined in this section. D. AUTHORITY The Planning Manager of EDNSP shall coordinate the annual Title 4 development regulation amendment process. E. PROCESS 1. All proposed amendments relating to Title 4 development regulations shall be reviewed by EDNSP and considered for an amendment to Title 4 development regulations. 2. The deadline for submitting proposed amendments is December 15 for consideration in the amendment process for the following year. 3. By the first business day of May, the EDNSP Department shall issue a staff report response to all proposed amendments. Responses shall include a recommendation indicating whether or not the proposed amendment(s) are to be included in that year's recommended Title 4 development regulation update. If the proposed changes will not be included in the next transmittal to Council, EDNSP shall indicate the reason(s)why, and shall inform the proponent that they may petition the Council during the review process. 4. By the first business day of May, EDNSP shall forward to the Council a report including all proposed amendments and comments with a staff response. 5. Upon receipt of the Title 4 development regulation amendment report, the Council shall mail written notice to all proponents of amendment requests containing the council review process for the current year, and informing proponents that they may petition the Council to consider amendment proposals that were not recommended. This 1 05129/2002 notice shall include the schedule of dates for public hearings, committee meetings, and any other opportunities for public testimony on the current year's Title 4 development regulations update. 6. Comments relating to Title 4 development regulations shall be reviewed by the appropriate city departments. Those that also require a Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be forwarded to EDNSP and considered for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RMC 4-9-020. 7. Title 4 amendment proposals that are rejected by the City shall not be reconsidered,unless a compelling case for changed circumstances can be made, for a period of two years. Proponents of Title 4 amendment proposals shall be notified in writing, once the status of the proposal is resolved. F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A City of Renton Submittal Form shall be submitted for a Title 4 development regulation amendment in order to be formally considered. G. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD See RMC 4-8-080H, and RMC 4-8-090. Typically Type X Land Use Permits,but may be Type IX if Planning Commission review is not necessary, as determined by the EDNSP Administrator. 2 05/29/2002 G. LAND USE PERMIT PROCEDURES: z o w I- ❑ 0 E w O V Z ❑ UO CI__ F z O O w z < 2 w O zo w � O UU 2 Q _z Op a z � W — ma OU w < (1/2UO wa pek p LAND USE PERMITS a ad O i o � Oad v = TYPE I Building and Grading Permitsi No No No Staff HE CC SC Business Licenses for Home No No No Staff HE CC SC Occupations (no customer visits/deliveries) Deferrals No No No Staff HE CC SC Lot Line Adjustments No No No Staff HE CC SC Minor Modification to Previously No No No Staff HE CC SC Approved Site Plan (<10%) Modifications, Deviations, Alternates of No No No Staff HE CC SC Various Code Standards2 Public Art Exemption Certificate No No No Staff HE CC SC Routine Vegetation Management Permits No No No Staff HE CC SC (SEPA exempt) Shoreline Exemptions No No No Staff HE CC SC Special Fence Permits No No No Staff HE CC SC Waivers2 No No No Staff HE CC SC TYPE II Business Licenses for Home Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Occupations (with customer visits/deliveries) Conditional Approval Permit Yes No No 'Staff HE CC SC (nonconforming structures) Short Plats —4 Lots or Less (SEPA Yes No No Staff HE CC SC exempt) Site Plan Review (administrative)for Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Secondary Uses (SEPA exempt) ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 Temporary Use Permits (SEPA exempt) Yes3 No No Staff CC CC SC Temporary Emergency Wetland Permit Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Variances, Administrative Yes No No Staff HE CC SC TYPE 1114 Binding Site Plans Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Conditional Use Permit (administrative) Yes No No Staff HE CC SC with Environmental Review Development Permit (special flood Yes No No Staff HE CC SC hazard) Environmental Review9 Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Site Plan Review (administrative) with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review Shoreline Permit Yes No No Staff DOE CC SC Short Plats —4 Lots or Less, with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review Temporary Use Permits (subject to Yes No No Staff HE CC SC SEPA) Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes No No Staff HE CC SC with any of the above TYPE IV4 Variances, Board of Adjustments (and Yes NA BOA BOA SC building permits submitted in conjunction with above) TYPE V Conditional Approval Permit Yes Staff HE HE CC SC (nonconforming uses) Request for Extension of Amortization Period Yes NA HE HE NA CC SC of Adult Use (Amd. Ord. 4827, 1-24-2000) TYPE VI4 Bulk Storage Special Permit Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Conditional Use Permit (Hearing Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Examiner) Fill and Grade Permit, Special Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Master Site Plan Approval (overall plan) Yes Staff HE HE CC SC ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 2 Mobile Home Parks, Preliminary and Yes Staff HE HE CC SC Final Shoreline Conditional Use Permit6 Yes Staff HE DOE, SHB HE Shoreline Variances (es Staff HE DOE, SHB HE Short Plats —5 to 9 Lots Yes Staff HE HE CC Site Plan Review (Hearing Examiner) Yes Staff HE HE CC with Environmental Review Special Permits Yes Staff HE HE CC Variances (associated with Hearing Yes Staff HE HE CC Examiner land use review) Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes Staff HE HE CC with any of the above Environmental Review Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Site Plan Review (administrative) with Yes No No Staff HE CC SC Environmental Review TYPE VII4 - Preliminary Plats — 10 Lots or More Yes Staff,HE CC SC HE Planned Unit Developments (preliminary Yes Staff,HE CC SC and final) HE Rezones (site-specific, not associated Yes Staff,HE CC SC with a Comprehensive Plan amendment) HE Building Permits submitted in conjunction Yes Staff,HE CC SC SC with any of the above HE TYPE VIII4 Final Plats No Staff NA CC SC Street Vacationss Yes Staff CC CC SC TYPE IX4 Development Regulation Text Yes Staff CC CC SC Amendments— Except those referred to Planning Commission ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 TYPE X4 Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Yes Staff,PC, CC SC Amendments PC CC Rezones with Associated Yes Staff,PC, CC SC Comprehensive Plan Map or Text PC CC Amendments Zoniag-CedeDevelopment Regulation 'Yes Staff,PC, CC SC Text Amendments Referred to Planning PC CC Commission TYPE XI Reserved for Annexations @1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 4 o T"O �. v a v o Ua a.) - o a co') dar Uq V) .. � oCie 11, O - ' `) � dw U U Q • • • PO OD OP ,--4 U • CI w y • .r••, 5 •.d it 8 .72, ,a, ..., . . o wp_i aw 6, Oa v ae r. O N W U O G o N z Z o O a Q a� W TS ct •0-1 W \ U 0. O U co) c, O a' 0 g vo con T K o •v el w CI) o > . 3 5 b � g01) � r ` 41 Q y '- 0 & y � .c `e aai v, U d w °�' G -d c 0 0, 20N •= o *° v .- Cl) y ow (� p ' p Lt, a'� Ct .� a 3 • X r�i d - ; — o ¢ a.' E QI 1 = p ^ P. d yam : V) � o — y N t" y N U 1. g am+ C. °' `. • o g,~ _ o E • EQ= Y a � CD aU b , = v ✓ ^" o' a" p U .� a'-1 y •1 W • v - „ Tiw = ' \ c> w � Q .r E 0_ . v ¢.� iY a' p o c`cl @X .< VI o a) r > a aU w w ¢ ¢t- - • • • -- N M V .,a Submittal Form City of Renton Title 4 Development Regulation Amendments DATE OF SUBMITTAL NAME ADDRESS PHONE(including area code) CODE SECTION(S) DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE: Proponent Signature: ALL COMPLETED FORMS RECEIVED BY THE CITY WILL BE SENT TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,NEIGHBORHOODS, & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SEE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND MAILING ADDRESS. 1 For Department Use only: Issue No. City-Initiated Applications Only Manager's Signature Authorizing EDNSP to Process Submittal Form: City of Renton Title 4 Development Regulation Amendment Information RCW 36.70A.470 [abbreviated] Docketing means compiling and maintaining a list of suggested changes to the comprehensive plan or development regulations in a manner that will ensure such suggested changes will be considered by the city and will be available for review by the public. The City's development regulations shall include a procedure for any interested person to suggest plan or development regulation amendments. The suggested amendments shall be considered on at least an annual basis. Deficiency in a comprehensive plan or development regulation refers to the absence of required or potentially desirable contents of a comprehensive plan or development regulation. City of Renton Municipal Code contains a section on the Title 4 Development Regulation Amendment process. Please refer to RMC 4-9-025 for specific language. Forms must be mailed or submitted to: City of Renton Economic Development,Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning Renton City Hall—6`h Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 2 err' s. Y 0 0.4 ♦ City of Renton 2002 Summary of Title 4 Development Regulation Amendment Proposals Hover cursor over yellow help keys for tips [Helpl] PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 6, 2002[Help2] Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process (Referred January 14, 2002)[Help3] The Planning and Development Committee reviewed the Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process March 21st, 2002 and June 6th, 2002. Committee members directed staff to develop an annual amendment process that complies with state law, yet allows Council the flexibility to deal with imperative issues that need immediate attention. It is recommended that the Title 4 Development Regulation Revision Process be referred to the City Attorney's Office for preparation of an ordinance and that a public hearing be scheduled for June 17, 2002. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Chair Tern Briere,Vice Chair King Parker,Member cc: Sue Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Alex Pietsch,EDNSP Director Neil Watts,Development Services Director P&D Committee Report on Docket.doc\ Rev 01/02 bh