The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1_ plortmg voles: I c I. Seed mix to be nydrxeeded aver cll wetland ^rd wetland hult'•r nraas tc he dctsr`d ay mil.galien aelWtles IncrA m9 plartlnq cod Irs:olll of roolwads. 2 Hootweds shot t cnchored prior to planting. 3 ,ill- species :o be plur ted ❑s 63 dolma o �" cult�ngs. j `� u` 4. Dagwap7 species lc be plonlea Iran 1-gelWn size ' cantomcrs. Black Lollonwaod shoal he minimum 6' in heghi, r multi-hrancIll. wits s,ngle, dcmlran; :ender. W m � II � tL : � m r i II' '� ❑ sroP� wwx r,rca arvx s a muxx rxx x.wpu �� — ` a 9G�ws rP[E 1 I rxr, Ar+.4. ^fittESFNR nE 'OPCGbAK rLVVP!5 .<. 1r f i Prcjec: Name: SJrr 34th Street -jiver-. F'eplcce rent Fr3jec: Pi-;rpn5y Eo replace fair, siCe—by—sMe %7 -nch mdverl5 wiln one, 3'D—'eolt �y 'l -loot 4 si�ad bcx rulNert rohlrr. N D27 Lecol Desc, pl n T2,1. RSE, NW I /a. 'S,J; a` Section 32, and NE VA, SE V4 ai Section 2S, 1`23N, R4E In_ city of Reid _ At: and SIN 3491 St Coll Stole, VVA 7F � wa rL]i [cn vv arr scrcx wvarr-r a vn:Jxr ffxrn ate.. au �� un,rr Pre *rx 3K„r 04 »tYe xirC ca*c rnixcJ.rzo �rtru a.�c e'T aswP. wcn v*tc WC r0.'"Jwt [HLQ�[ aX. sv � aor 9� S�OANtx Yt[R urrJtIXf -- -- rCi C jx[ UrL'FM'+6Jx0 0.l.ieC - -.-_ —_ VC[RL4vJMO SIKN h:ER Shuty7 of 4+ao Prepared: December Y pT F� Jones & Stokes o� w a � Wa QWm� S� Nw¢Z �qQy �4t�r r�¢LL� �lsd y� S V I I � I I I} I I I Ij7 I I C 71 I , 1 iI1 III I � " � 1 a n {V - '•. ... a.. SW s11N SIRECI 3f 1 y v I � g Ji J Al � - ► qXG CNiIT I , 1. O�WIMSf pSffbC� `';. IRWI a I I L3an'Jl LL LL-SS-ddd ��'� �51a1 �i##1C� WK 6 IOmI-IRIPIIV Alp lggl RIlW1AP4li - �� - �rl u�aua �W -* CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC NOTICE Washington State Department of Ecology NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project The City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA, is seeking coverage under the Washington Department of Ecology's NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities. The proposed 1.45-acre project, known as the SW 34[� Street Culvert Replacement Project is located at SW 34th Street and Springbrook Creek in the City of Renton. Approximately 1.45 acres will be disturbed for construction of a box culvert to replace 4 undersized CMP culverts. Construction activities include installation of bypass pipe for stream diversion, dewatering, excavation of roadway berth for installation of foundation material and box culvert, relocation of power, gas, communication, sewer and roadway restoration. Stormwater originating from the excavated area will be discharged from a settling tank prior to discharge to the north into a stream bypass pipe for approximately 200 feet to Springbrook Creek. Offsite stormwater runoff originating from the undisturbed roadway will be diverted to the existing storm system in SW 34th Street. Any persons desiring to present their views to the Department of Ecology concerning this application may notify Ecology in writing within 30 days from the last date of publication of this notice. Comments may be submitted to: Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Program Stormwater Unit - Construction PO Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 �zc-c- �• LCJ4 ��pr� Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk Published: King County Journal January 12 & 19, 2007 Account No. 50640 C:'%DOCLIM—118waltanlLOC'ALS--1`;l'emp\CityClerkmenio.dm CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORDS MEMORANDUM Date: August 7, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: 34th Street Culvert Replacement LUA (file) Number: LUA-06-032, SME, ECF Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Valerie Kinast Acceptance Date: April 18, 2006 Applicant: Allen Quynn, City of Renton - Utilities Owner: City of Renton Y Contact: Alien Quynn, City of Renton - Utilities ti PID Number: N/A ERC Approval Date: May 9, 2006 ERC Appeal Date: May 29, 2006 tl Administrative Approval: May 5, 2006 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Myiar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot rt area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. Location: At the intersection of SW 34t" Street & Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th Street Comments: PARTIES OF RECORD 34TH ST CULVERT REPLACEMENT LUA06-032, SME, ECF Allen Quynn Karen Walter City of Renton Renton Partners LLC Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1055 S Grady Way 11911 NE 1st Street ste: #B-101 Fisheries Dept, Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98005 39015 172nd Avenue SE tel: 425-4307247 (party of record) Auburn, WA 98092 eml: aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us (party of record) (owner / applicant / contact) Updated: 05/05/06 (Page 1 of 1) lker, Mayor CITX 3F RENTON ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department �■ 1 Kathy KeoGregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator June 16, 2006 Allen Quynn City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: 34"' Street Culvert Replacement LUA06-032, SME, ECF Dear Mr. Quynn: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended on May 29, 2006, for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERG) Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated for the above - referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination, this decision is final, and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed_ The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Staff Report dated May 9, 2006. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Oa�r�e Valerie Kinast Associate Planner cc: Renton Partners LLC / Party of Record Karen Walter — Mukleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. / Party of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 MThis paper mrvhfns5G%recvcledmaterial,30%postconsumer RENTQN AHEAD OF THE CURVE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DETiE flI1NATION EM'IRONNIENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE PUBLIC NOTICE RENTON, WAS111NGTON The Environmental Review Com- Jody Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising mittee has issued a Determination of Re resentative of the Non -Significance -Mitigated for the fol- p lowing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SW 34th Street Culvert King County Journal Replacement Project LUA06-032, SME, CAR, EC1' Location: At the intersection of a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general SA 34th St and Springbrook circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date Creel:, just east of 800 SW 34th St. The City of Renton Surface of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language Water Utility is requesting continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King Environmental fSEPAI Review, a County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Devel- Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. opment Permit, and a Critical The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly diameter culverts with one 80-ft, distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high notice, a concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St, An existing fl- inch sewer line would be rerouted Public Notice and gas, power and communi- cations utilities would be relo- cated. The stream would be was published May 15, 2006. diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft- area containing the stream, associated The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum wetlands and bufi'er area. of $130.20. Appeals of the environmental f, determination must be filed in writing '�i� 7 L on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. C Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 ,. J B 1 y �J application fee with: Bearing Exam- aPlWn mm_ ��l r c I I n: iner, City of Renton, 1055 South legal Advertising Representative, King County JournAl ' t " % Grady Way, Renton, WA 98455. Subscribed and sworn to me this 15 day of May, 20D6. .`� c ; Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- p c ' ' tion 4-8-110.8. Additional information G i� '# vrosY;o,•G �� • ' regarding the appeal process may be /�,.} Y� �! �` obtained from the Renton City Clerk's B D Cantelon QPubli425) 4 -6510. , Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent, Wd N� ington lb, 2006 Published in the King County Journal PO Number: May 1.5, 2006. #860504 City _ _ _enton Department of Planning / Building / P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 8, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: V lerie Kinast 1 PROJECT TITLE: SW 340 Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dots n SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: Springbrook_ Creek & 5W 34`h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Spdngbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx_ 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclGultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. y s� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 Wastewater Treatment Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks King Street Center 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 May 9, 2006 Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 MAY 1 ¢ 26006 RE: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement (File No. LUA06-032, SME, ECF) The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated, dated April 18, 2006, for the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project. King County is requesting that the City of Renton submit sewer extension plans and modifications for the project to the Design, Construction and Asset Management Program, Civil/Architectural Section for local public agency review. Drawings should be submitted for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please send the drawings to: Eric Davison, DCAM, Civil/Architectural Section King County Wastewater Treatment Division 201 South Jackson Street, KSC-NR-0508 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Tel. (206) 684- t 707 erIG.CEayi�G371«ri ietr[ii<U. ` vie Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, i Barbara Questad Environmental Planner cc: Eric Davison, DCAM, Civil/ArchltCCtLtral Section &-461JOIMM CLEAN WATER- A SOUND INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTFRESTE➢ PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SW 34" Street Culvert Replacement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08.032, SME, CAR. ECF LOCATION: At the inters ectlon of SW 34th St. and Spill Creek, just east of 800 SW 341h St. DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility In requesting Environmental ISEPAI Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Sobstanlial Development Parini and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace Four t10 ft. long, 72-'inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30.1t. wide and 10 N. high concrete box culvert et the intersection of Sprirrgbrock Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 04rich sewer line would be uted reroand gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be dive rted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 55- by J25-N. area containing the stream, associated weUands and buffer area. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE {ERG} HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:D0 PM on May 29. Wall. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sactian 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 1425, 43"510, IF Ti ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION iS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMAT]ON, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ❑iVISION AT {425) 43D-720D. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMSER when calling for proper file identifi.tion. CERTIFICATION NN hereby certify that :Si copies of the above do zYi,, . e �10Irl t.fi were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described grope "IapTAlp � DATE: 5 I3, 06 SIGNED: '' . �f�fiA�a0�ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing iJ ? i -iW A 1 W i CHIC i�ic on the 1 ��h day of NOTARY PUBLIC SIGTURE: CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 111h day of May, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Allen Quynn - City of Renton Utilities Owner/Applicant Renton Partners LLC POR Karen Walter - Muckleshoot Fisheries Dept. POR (Signature of Send STATE OF WASHINGTON ) — ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �YNN fir` .�att14i1i4 Dated: _ c t, �- , I _ 1 ! — Notary P blic in ant for the Sate of Notary(Print): My appointment expires: 61 - kL, I�11; 01ky1NIpS ; ti��rr%\ Project Name: SW 34" Street Culvert Replacement Project Project Number: LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW - Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160'r' Ave SE 39015 — 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region ` Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers ` KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"� Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template - affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SW 34'h Street Culvert Replacement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF LOCATION: At the intersection of SW 34th St. and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th St. DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-8510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please.indud the P *act NUMBER when calliltg.for proper flIb identification.;: Y "'R 41 Kathy Keollrer, Mayor May 11, 2006 Allen Quynn City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SW 34 h Street Culvert Replacement Project LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF Dear Mr. Quynn: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non - Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Section C for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, �/", L r r Valerie Kinast Associate Planner cc: Renton Partners LLC, Karen Walter / Party(ies) of Record Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 0 This paper contains SC iecyde i material, 30°/ post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF T14E CURVE Kathy Keolker, Mayor May 11, 2006 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 9, 2006: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: SW 34 h Street Culvert Replacement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF LOCATION: At the intersection of SW 34th St. and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th St. DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30- ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. Appeals must be fled in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Valerie Kinast Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Mucldeshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation F-nrinci,rn R E N T O N lOSS South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 AHLAD OF THE CURVE ihis paper contains 5[}'.'� recycled material. 3Q % oos1 consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton — Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the intersection of SW 34th St. and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th St. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C,030(2)(c), Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B, Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: May 15, 2006 DATE OF DECISION: May 9, 2006 SIGNATURES: '44 edof ZOOaZO:�2 Gregg Zimm r n, dmHnistrat r Date Larry Rude, Interim Fire Chief D e Planning/Building/Public Works Fire Department Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Alex Pietsch, Administrator Date Community Services EDNSP CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton — Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: At the intersection of SW 34th St, and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th St. The City of Renton Department of Plan ningBuilding/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall follow the submitted Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan. 2. The applicant shall implement conservation measures as recommended by the consultants in the Biological Assessment ERC Mitigation Measures Page t of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton — Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the intersection of SW 34th St. and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 34th St. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant. - The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. Some of the mitigation application documents. as proposed, and that starting work. measures included in this report are proposed by the applicant in the project It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all mitigation is implemented any additional information requiring review is submitted and approved prior to 2. The project requires exemptions from shoreline and wetlands regulations and must meet the conditions of approval of the Exemption from a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and the Exemption from Wetlands Critical Areas Regulations granted for the project. Fire 1. Maintain emergency access at all times. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2006 'Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda fisted below. THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SW 34"' Street Culvert Reolacement Proiect (Kinast) LUA06-032, SME, CAR, ECF The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer B. Wolters, EDNSP Director 0 J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, PIB/PW Development Services Director O F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, PIB/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney STAFF RFPORT A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name: Owner/Applicant Contact: File Number: City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE May 9, 2006 SW 34'h Street Culvert Replacement Project City of Renton — Surface Water Utility Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utilities LUA-06-032, SME, CAR, ECF Project Manager: Valerie Kinast Project Description: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St_ An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. (Please see the next page for a more lengthy description.) Project Location: At the intersection of SW 34�h St. and Springbrook Creek, just east of 800 SW 341h St. Site Area: Approx_ 20,800 sq. ft. Area of disturbance Approx. 18,650 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee Issue a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). Project Location Map N T ERC Report City of Renton P/B/PW Department E nmental Review Committee Staff Report SW 34Tx STREET CULVERT REPL.,,,EMENT LUA-06-032, SME, CAR, ECF REPORT OF MA Y 9, 2006 Page 2 of 6 Project description: The applicant is proposing to replace four 110-ft. long, 72-inch diameter culvert pipes under SW 34th St. with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10-ft. high concrete box culvert. The culverts provide a crossing for Springbrook Creek under SW 34`h St.. Replacement of the culverts is part of the East Side Green River Watershed Plan, would aid in alleviating flooding in the Renton Valley area, and improve conditions for fish. Springbrook Creek in the vicinity of S 34th St. is a modified straight channel. Vegetation along the stream is primarily reed canary grass, with several small willows growing just to the north of S 34th St.. The streambed here is made up of a mixture of gravel and sand with some finer sediment. In places, reed canary grass has invaded the active channel. There is very little woody debris or other habitat supporting structures in the site area or vicinity. Animals present near the site include salmon, trout, heron and beaver. The project would include removal of the existing culverts. Temporary coffer dams would be placed in the stream bed at both ends of the site and the water would be removed from an approximately 325-ft. long section of the stream. Two 48-inch diameter temporary diversion pipes would be installed along the west bank of the stream to carry the water across the site while the culverts are being replaced. Dewatering would be undertaken to keep the area of work dry. The new culvert would be installed in the same location as the existing pipe culverts. it would be a 30-ft. wide, by 80-ft. long, by 10 ft_ high concrete four-sided box culvert. It would be placed approximately two feet below the grade of the stream and infilled with cobble and gravel. It would raise the surface of the street above by 2.3 ft. An existing 8-inch diameter sewer line would be relocated and routed approximately 900 ft. east to Lind Ave. SW. An existing water supply line would be routed along the downstream face of the culvert in a carrier pipe. This water line would be housed inside of a protective 22-inch diameter pipe. Existing gas, electric, and communications lines would be routedunder the culvert. The street will either be removed in part or completely for the duration of the project. Temporary removal of the full width of the street would prohibit all traffic to pass, but would expedite the project. The culvert replacement project would require disturbance of approximately 18,650 sq. ft. of stream, wetland and buffer area. 5,041 sq. ft. of this area is below the ordinary high water mark. Springbrook Creek is designated a Class 1 waterway, a Shoreline of the State, and is regulated by the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Regulations. As such, the project requires either a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit or an exemption there from. The applicant has applied for an exemption for normal maintenance and repair per RMC 4-9-190C3_ Because of the presence of Category 2 wetlands on the site, a Critical Areas Exemption, per RMC 4-3-05005g, is also required. The site is zoned Light Industrial (IL) and designated Employment Area Valley (EAV) in the Comprehensive Plan. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF XX DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall follow the submitted Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan. 2. The applicant shall implement conservation measures as recommended by the consultants in the Biological Assessment ERC Report City of Renton PIBIPW Department L nmental Review Committee Staff Report SW 34r" STREET CULVERT REPL_EMENT LUA-06-03Z SME, CAR, EC1= REPORT OF MAY 9, 2006 Page 3 of 6 Advisory Notes to Applicant. The following notes are supplemental information determination. Because these notes are provided as process for environmental determinations. provided in conjunction with the environmental information only, they are not subject to the appeal Planning 1. Some of the mitigation measures included in this report are proposed by the applicant in the project application documents. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all mitigation is implemented as proposed, and that any additional information requiring review is submitted and approved prior to starting work. 2. The project requires exemptions from shoreline and wetlands regulations and must meet the conditions of approval of the Exemption from a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and the Exemption from Wetlands Critical Areas Regulations granted for the project. Fire 1. Maintain emergency access at all times. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The area of work consists of a flat riverbed, embankments with slopes of up to 30%, and flat areas along SW 34t St. The soil consists of approximately 4.5 feet of fill underlain by soft organic silt/peat over alluvium composed of unconsolidated sand, silt, and clay. Very soft estuarine deposits were noted below the alluvium to the full depth of the exploration borings (61.5 feet). Liquifiable layers of soil ranging in thickness from 6 feet to 24 feet were found in the site area. These soils are unstable, and have very low strength. They are compressible under the placement of fill or heavy structures. In a seismic event, 1 inch to 10 inches of settlement of the soils could be expected. This could lead to damage of the new culvert and stream bed, and disturb the flow of the stream. The possible impacts due to placement of the culvert onto unstable soils is mitigated by the design of the project. A cement box culvert, as opposed to pilings, would disperse the weight of the structure over more area and minimize the potential amount of differential settlement. Crushed rock or a controlled density fill mat would be used for foundation support thus protecting the structure from damage and sufficiently mitigating any impacts to the streambed or water flow. The project would require the trenching and excavation of 5,947 cy of soil and the subsequent placement of 3,268 cy of fill in order to remove the existing culverts and install the new culvert and replace the roadway. The 3,268 cy of fill would include on -site excavated material, imported material, and subgrade crushed rock, additional fill to grade, and 277 cy of streambed gravels. Risk of erosion would arise because of the clearing and excavation of the site to temporarily divert the stream and install the culvert. Isolating the segment of the creek where the work would take place, is a measure that would mitigate erosion impacts to the stream. To further minimize the impacts, the Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan proposes clearly demarcating the area of work from the no -work areas on and around the site. The submitted plans did not clearly indicate the area -of -work, but staff consulted with the applicant and added to the existing plans the delineation of the area -of -work. A Construction Mitigation Plan was submitted by the applicant that outlines how impacts would be minimized during the project construction phase. The applicant states that the project would implement best management practices and also the recommendations in the Wet Weather Earthwork section of the submitted geotechnical report. An Erosion Control Plan and Spill Prevention, Control, and Containment Plan would also be implemented for the project. As a condition of granting the Shoreline Exemption for the project, the applicant is required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume Ii of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. ERC Report City of Renton P/B/PW Department E nmental Review Committee Staff Report SW 34T" STREET CULVERT REPL�MENT LUA-06-032, SME, CAR, ECF REPORT OF MAY 9, 2006 Page 4 of 6 After the culvert is replaced the applicant proposes in the Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan to replant the disturbed areas with native herbaceous, shrub, and tree species in the wetland and stream buffer areas. Disturbed areas in the roadway vicinity would be hydroseeded. These measures would provide stability of the slopes. A condition of approval of the Wetlands Critical Areas Exemption requires the applicant to submit a revised planting plan showing more vegetation. A Monitoring and Maintenance Plan is also required. This will assure that adequate vegetation is replaced and avoid long term impacts to soils at the site. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended_ Policy Nexus: NIA 2. Air Impacts: During construction, dust and exhaust from construction equipment would occur. Trucks needed to haul fill would cause dust and emit exhaust. After construction no impacts to the air would be expected. Short-term noise from construction equipment would occur during the duration of construction of the culvert replacement project, and be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. The equipment and construction of this project would be required to meet federal, state, and local emissions and noise regulations; therefore no further mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: NIA 3. Water impacts: Temporary impacts to Springbrook Creek and the two wetlands on site would be substantial, with an approximately 325 feet length of the stream being laid dry while the culvert is being replaced. These impacts would be mitigated though if the applicant follows the Wetlands Mitigation Report submitted to the City and the conditions of approval of the Shoreline Exemption and Wetlands Critical Areas Exemption. The applicant's consultants estimate the area under the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) that would be disturbed to be 5,331 sq. ft., with another 290 sq, ft. of wetland above the OHWM being disturbed by the project. Staff estimates the total area of work to be 18,650 sq. ft., which is made up of stream, wetland and buffer areas. Springbrook Creek would be diverted through two 48-inch pipes that would runt along the stream bank, which would allow the stream to flow at full capacity, while isolating that part of the site where the culvert is being replaced. The diversion would be limited to a time period of up to 14 weeks, depending on whether SW 34�h St. is completely closed, or part of the street remains open to traffic. Water that would be pumped from the construction area while the stream is diverted, would be treated before being released into Springbrook Creek, or be discharged into the sanitary sewer system, if it does not meet State water quality standards. Permanent impacts to water would be expected to be positive. The replacement culvert would offer more capacity for water flow. Replacing four cylindrical pipes with one box culvert that rests within the streambed and has airspace above the water would offer conditions that more closely emulate natural stream conditions. The new culvert would increase the slope of SW 34`h St., so the applicant has proposed necessary new storm drains, so that surface water runoff is adequately contained and does not enter the Springbrook Creek system. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the submitted Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan, The applicant shall implement conservation measures as recommended by the consultants in the Biological Assessment. Policy Nexus: NIA 4. Plants Impacts: An area of approximately 14,000 sq. ft. would be cleared for the project. The submitted Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan proposes removal of invasive species and replanting with native herbaceous, shrub, and tree species. The plan proposes widening the stream channel to form alcove pools on the west bank in two places, one to the south and one to the north of SW 34'h St.. Root wads would be installed and willow, dogwood and black cottonwood would be planted to enhance the area as fish habitat. The Planting Plan submitted with the application only depicts plantings at the two new pools, with the remaining disturbed wetland and stream buffer area being seeded with a mix of grass and sedges. As a condition of the Critical Areas Exemption granted for the project, the applicant is required to provide the City with a revised planting plan depicting more extensive vegetation. The applicant is required to ERC Report City of Renton P/B/PW Department E nmental Review Committee Staff Report SW 34TN STREET CULVERT REPL.,,.,-_MENT LUA-06-032, SME, CAR, ECF REPORT OF MAY 9, 2006 Page 5 of 6 increase the number of willows and add additional trees in the buffer areas. A Monitoring and Maintenance Plan is also required. With the additional vegetation, the impacts to plants by the project would be sufficiently mitigated. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: NIA S. Animals Impacts: Diverting Springbrook Creek and replacing the culvert could have a negative impact on fish for a limited period of time. A Biological Assessment conducted by Jones & Stokes for R.W. Beck Associates lists an increase of sediment transport and deposition downstream as a possible negative effect of the temporary diversion, grading, dewatering and excavation at the site. They note that the relocation of fish may cause stress to the fish. The consultants recommend limiting work to a period between June 15th and September 301h because it would limit the number of fish in the stream at the time of diversion. Use of approved fish removal methods would decrease the likelihood of injuring fish. Isolation of the in -channel work area, use of a Baker Tank for treating dewatering discharge and adhering to erosion and sediment control measures would also avoid impacts to fish, according to the report. The applicant is working with the local Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) representative on minimizing impacts to animals during the culvert replacement project. He has also submitted a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application. In addition to the measures addressed above, the applicant is proposing mitigating for possible impacts to fish by creating two permanent alcove pools along the shoreline, one north and one south of SW 34th St.. Root wads would be placed in the alcoves and vegetation would be planted to provide habitat for fish. Both the WDFW representative and a representative of the Muckleshoot tribe have indicated that replanting a larger stretch of the disturbed stream area in a way similar to the planned vegetation around the alcoves would be advisable to mitigate the impacts of the project. As conditions of approval of the Critical Areas Exemption from the wetlands regulations, a planting plan showing an increased number of plants in the wetland and buffer areas, and a Monitoring and Maintenance Plan are required. Positive impacts of the culvert replacement would be the decrease of water velocity as it passes under SW 34th St. during high -flow events in the future. The submitted Biological Assessment furthermore predicts that by replacing the existing four pipes with a wide concrete box culvert could also be beneficial to animals in and around Springbrook Creek because it would reduce roadway overtopping events upstream, which would reduce pollutant exposure to stream water and the potential for fish stranding. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the submitted Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan. The applicant shall implement conservation measures as recommended by the consultants in the Biological Assessment. Policy Nexus: SEPA 6. Recreation Impacts: The culvert replacement project, as presented in the submitted application, would not impact the public trail along Springbrook Creek. Work at all phases of the project would be limited to the west bank of the stream and the area directly along the shoreline on the east side of the stream. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: NIA 7. Transportation Impacts: The culvert replacement project would require partial or complete closure of SW 341h St. directly at the site location. The impact to traffic in the vicinity would be mitigated with rerouting or phased construction. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: NIA ERC Report City of Renton P/B/PW Department E nmentat Review Committee Staff Report SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPL- -MENT LUA-06-032, SME, CAR, ECF REPORT OF MAY S, 2006 Page 6 of 6 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. There were no comments by City Reviewers. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 29, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Attachments: Reductions of Project Plans Shoreline Exemption and Critical Areas Exemption ERC Report \ I I •AA _ _ - NS W •{oPc�op �nx yoroua � 70 TV'q.q [� ATE. V �i at JY 6 I � m C>I 1 U� I � 1 I I 1 fI 1 I � gffli WaNz a 1 I 1 I M pNG COVMfY wmw SGW asRCT 1 {I 1 J I 1 I I — LL AMADII Project Nome: SW 34th Streel Culvert P,eP:ocemenl Protect Purpose To replcee tour• side—by—srde 72—;nj, CjIverts with one, 30—Fo t by 1p—r:;❑t. 4—sided box culvert Lulurrr, NA027 Lego, Description: T23N, R5E, N'N 1/4, S%V li3 0° Section M. and NE 1/4, H 1%4 or Section 25. 723N, ft4E P n in No I Seed mix to he hydroseeded Over dl wetland and wetland Cufler areas to he d'st",W hg mit,galian ocGvitles includirl plantlna and installation of rootwads. 2 Root*ads shoe he an:h ared prior to pJanhng- 3, )h'illow species to he planted ai 60" dormant Cuttings- 4, pogwaadpecies sto to planted Iron 1 -gallon mu containers. .n.-hrun hed. r thdsi gle• dorninant feader;n he;ght, ii s _ sw O U ;j at m ac ` — I WPM Q 9 2 2 d 9 1Yle1d� N a5F _11 1 Il L— '•. � I� � iI I z � y' Il V � g II 0 ma water w�rsrHrs n< maorRwe yes .s r�-r • � � � � I ,� v. zoos. o A o eercn cx sez r5 � In'. City ❑f Rent.in At'. Irterseclan o` SF,r�ntr,�ok track and S'N 34th St County of-{,Irg Stote: VA OF Application aY' RF11TON n swriwr rceu nrrn 7u', �, un,n eau ww YrN� o r�r eac J� MRR n,IpNi ocw ¢awrrern ka, yyN 9]xY Oewi YYMai ssw swran srrp ...cs aoru war s-+,n `>`iil•= wz�nYc ---- rexcr u� Q mw swri �._ varmww,m si r - "aniomm ast. uw�zxauuxa DER Sheet 7 of Map jrepored: December 2C15 Jones & Stokes ,«_gym, go+qL VIE OA3 � s a % _.e _ _.13 _.a w # m 2 ODOFL @ ■ 2 / 2 | i§ ■ � m,� _.e * . A • m � 4K K (| § ODK .e § §§ 1 s .s w K ■ o«11 _.e w VI _ , k _,m _ _ IDI_ _.n "I., AS w iLLi-SS- a G3 - 19 T23N RM W 1/2 IL IH 7th St 27th St RC SW 23rd St. R -1 IL w CA 1671 r R-8 COT) 13 . 31 T23N ME W 1/2 ° H3 ,ZONING Rene ....� �..�..'�.� "" an Liltj Lkmllb 1:4BO0 { + 'C"' =Inc= 30 T23N ME W 1/2 5330 ZN,NING MAP BOO,. RL Resource Conservation R-t Residential I du/ac R-+ Residential 4 du/ec R-B Residential B du/ac RMH Residential Manufactured Homes R-LO Residentila] 10 du/ac a-1+ Residential 14 du/ac RH-F Residential Multi -Family kN-r Residential Multi -Family Traditional RM-0 Residential Multi -Family Urban Center* Cv Center Village 'J6-NL urban Center - North 1 U i Urban Center - North 2 LCOJ Center Downtown' COR Commercial/Office/Realdentiat CgvvrllrrtaE. Ca I Commercial Arterial• c❑ Commercial Office' [H Industrial - Heavy IM industrial - Medium EL Industrial - Light (P) Publicly owned ---..�.. Renton City Limits ..,-.. Adjacent City Limits �s Hook Pages Boundary EJ Commercial Neighborhood NROLt PAGE • May include Overlay ❑latrlcte_ See Appendix PAGE# INDEX tgaps. par additional regulations In Overlay Districts. please see RMC 4-3. sEctnvnnwwce Printed by Pnnt 81.4eil Svcs, City of Renton t -a CITY OF RENTON EXEMPTI0N FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS DATE: May 5, 2006 LAND USE FILE NO.: LUA-06-032, SME, ECF PROJECT NAME: SW 34"' Street Culvert Replacement OWNER: City of Renton Applicant: Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility, City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast, Assoicate Planner PROJECT LOCATION: Springbrook Creek where it intersects SW 34th Street PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. CRITICAL AREA: Two Springbrook Creek wetlands (category 2) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC 4-3-05005g Maintenance and Construction — Existing Uses and Facilities of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X i. Remodeling, Replacing, Removing Existing Structures, Facilities, and Improvements: Remodeling, restoring, replacing or removing structures, facilities and other improvements in existence on the date this section becomes effective and that do not meet the setback or buffer requirements of this section provided the work complies with the criteria in RMC 4-10-090. FINDINGS: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5: The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state or federal law or regulation; 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, H:IDivision.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.inglPROJECTS106-032.Valerie%Critical Area Exemption.doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF RENTON EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS DATE: May 5, 2006 LAND USE FILE NO.: LUA-06-032, SME, ECF PROJECT NAME: SW 34" Street Culvert Replacement OWNER: City of Renton Applicant: Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility, City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast, Assoicate Planner PROJECT LOCATION: Springbrook Creek where it intersects SW 341h Street PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Surface Water Utility is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and a Critical Areas Exemption for a proposal to replace four 110 ft. long, 72-inch diameter culverts with one 80-ft. long, 30-ft. wide and 10 ft. high concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8-inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 65- by 325-ft. area containing the stream, associated wetlands and buffer area. CRITICAL AREA: Two Springbrook Creek wetlands (category 2) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC 4-3-05005g Maintenance and Construction — Existing Uses and Facilities of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X i. Remodeling, Replacing, Removing Existing Structures, Facilities, and Improvements: Remodeling, restoring, replacing or removing structures, facilities and other improvements in existence on the date this section becomes effective and that do not meet the setback or buffer requirements of this section provided the work complies with the criteria in RMC 4-10-090. FINDINGS: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C,5: The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state or federal law or regulation; 2_ The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, H:\Division.slDevelop.serlDev&plan.inglPROJECTSI06-032.Valerie\Critical Area Exemption.doc Page 1 of 2 3. Impacts will be minimized and disturbed areas will be immediately restored, if submitted plans are followed and the conditions of approval of this exemption are met. 4. Where water body or buffer disturbance occurs during construction or other activities in accordance with this exemption, the site will be revegetated with native vegetation as proposed in the submitted Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Planting Plan and the revised Planting Plan, that is required as a condition of approval for this exemption. DECISION: An exemption from the wetlands critical areas regulations is approved for the SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement subject to the following condition: The applicant shall provide the City with a revised planting plan depicting more extensive vegetation of the disturbed areas. The applicant is required to increase the number of willows and add additional trees. The plan must be submitted prior to or with the application for construction permit review and is subject to the approval of the Development Services project manager. 2. The applicant shall provide the City with a detailed Monitoring and Maintanance Plan. The Monitoring and Maintanance Plan shall be submitted prior to or with the application for contruction permits. It is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services project manager. SIGNATURE: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department EXPIRATION: Five (5) years from the date of approval (signature date). H:IDivision.slDevelop.ser\Dev&plan.ingTROJECTSM-D32.Valei ie\Critica! Area Exemption.doc Page 2 of 2 date CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERM DATE: EXEMPTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: May 5, 2006 LUA-06-032, SME, ECF SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement OWNER: City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 APPLICANT I Contact: Allen Quynn City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 CONCIJ8 Env E�, ou�r� NAM I rrll UDATE -44 i` % X, PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10-ft. by 30-ft., 80-ft. long concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8- inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85-ft. by 140-ft. area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption, critical areas exemption and SEPA environmental review. PROJECT LOCATION: Springbrook Creek where it intersects SW 341h St. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: NA SEC-TWN-R: NE & SE'/4 25-23-4, and NW & SW '/4 30-23-5 WATER BODY/WETLAND: Springbrook Creek An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): XX 3. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DATE: May 5, 2006 EXEMPTION FILE NO.: LUA-06-032, SME, ECF PROJECT NAME: SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement OWNER: City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 APPLICANT / Contact: Allen Quynn City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10-ft. by 30-ft., 80-ft. long concrete box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing fl- inch sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85-ft. by 140-ft. area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption, critical areas exemption and SEPA environmental review. PROJECT LOCATION: Springbrook Creek where it intersects SW 341h St. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: NA SEC-TWN-R: NE & SE'/ 25-23-4, and NW & SW'/4 30-23-5 WATER BODY/WETLAND: Springbrook Creek An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): Xx 3. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition, b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. c. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT )OC Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. N/A The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. XK The Master Program. Subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. f/J Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division Attachments: Culvert Improvement Project Temporary Diversion Plan cc: Owner Applicant File Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc /�Y O PLANNING/BUILDING-/ I f: ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 2, 2006 TO: Valerie Kinast ;;.t`, FROM: Mike Dotson jlj, SUBJECT: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement; LUA06-032, SME, ECF The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -The site contains a 12-inch City of Renton watermain. SEWER - There is an existing sewer line adjacent to the proposed project. STORM - This site is within the Valley drainage basin; sub -basin of the Black River drainage basin. STREET -There is currently a paved public right-of-way, SW 34"' Street, at this location. The existing roadway improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. The drainage plan and report shall comply with the King County 2005 Surface Water design Manual. 3. On -site and off -site material haul routes will be required to be shown. A plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan may be required prior to the construction. I Iaul hours are restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. L%Plan Review%Plan Review 20WSW 34th street (T.doc City �nton Department of Planning/Building / Pi Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L 1 i �� COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement l,ll Y Vr' rt it'll VI PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson R E C E � V E D SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Springbrook Creek & SW 34`h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with oneI309t36fy-Toot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shorehne Use Animals Environrnenfal Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Giare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional}cCrpn is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Date City i nton Department of Planning / Building / Pu Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: );L.4' COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 R F t g 1` APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement APR PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A BUILDING DIVISION LOCATION: Springbrook Creek & SW 34" Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77566 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiongtin Tation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Directbf orAuthorized Representative Date City Anton Department of Planning / Building / Pi Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: v� YCtVl ��t.{ (lE_ COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 R E C E I V E D APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: SW 34t' Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A G C?IVi51QN LOCATION: Springbrook Creek & SW 34�" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants LandlShoretine Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreation Utilities Transkortatforr Public Services HistonclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this plicatkn with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi at in rmation is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City enton Department of Planning / Building / P_ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Sprinobrook Creek &_SW 34th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e_g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShorefine Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS ,. i'.�4 , C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City ..enton Department of Planning / Building /P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � 'f LC {� ,/t COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast " PROJECT TITLE: SW 34"' Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A APR 7a LOCATION: Springbrook Creek & SW 340 Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77566 BUILDINGG D)yigi�,n, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SERA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS M'A((E Elementofthe Environment Probable Mirror Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGfare Recreation Utilities Trans tion Public Services l istorklCutturat Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is needed to properly assess this proposai. ... r Signature of Directo or Authorized Representative Date City 'enton Department of Planning / Building / P . Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson APR 2 4 211:..: SITE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Springbrook Creek & SW 34th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 UTILITY SYSTEMS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th 5t. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histortcicultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet T400 Feet rt�u Guy112111, C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or — z7ll��. . Date City Mon Department of Planning / Building / Pt, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: - ' C COMMENTS DUI`: MAC--2, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-032, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie inast PROJECT TITLE: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SiTE AREA: 20,800 square feet BUILDING AREA(gross),NIA LOCATION. Springbrook Creek & SW 34f' Street WORK ORDER NO: 77566 ' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-1566t; 80=f6ot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS �A Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Maor Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet i400 Feet C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS f ' lt' Ci . TI We have reViewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whey additional inf lion is needed properly assess this proposal. Sian rekf Director or Authoriz eoresentative Date �ti�Y O ��ti K0� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: April 18, 20M LAND USE NUMBER: LLA06-032. SME, ECF PROJECT NAME: SW 34r, Street Culvert Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION; The applicant proposes replacemerd of four 72-inch diameter culverts whir are 10. by 30-fool, BC -foot long box culvert at the intersection of Spiingbrook Creek and SW 34th St, An existing g' sever:rne would be rerouled and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream world be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. I by 140-foot area conanding the stream, wetlands and butter area Re project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. PROJECT LOCATION: Spnngbrook Creek and SW 34e Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFfCANCE, MTfIGATED IONS -I As the Lead Agency. tFe C:f &Renton has dahermined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore. as Permitted under the RCW 43 2IC.I 10. the City of Renton is using the OPLonal ❑NS-M process to give notice that a I M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the protect and the proposed ONS-M are integrated into a sirgle aril period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Sig�irtcance- Mritgated iONS-My. A 14Say appeal period will follow the Issuance of the ONS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 23,200 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 18, 2006 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Allan Quynn, City o1 Remind; Tel'. (4251 430-7247; III aquynnactranton.wa.ua PermfteRavlaw Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Exam Peni Other Permits which may be required: Construction Perri Raquested Studies: Stream and Wetlands Study, Habitat Data Report, Geotechnical Report, Drainage Control Plan, Wetland Mitigatlon Plan Loothi where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC NEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZoningiLand Use; Envimnmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulalions Used For Proled Mitigation. Planningit ulldingiPul Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1065 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 N!A The subject site is designated Empleymenl Area Valley (i on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Light li-,c dal (It on the City s Zoning Map. Environmental Si Checklist Proposed Mitigation Maasurae: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitgatlon Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as eked above. The applicant shalt Comply with the submitted wetlands mi igadan pren. • The applicant shelf provide a Temporary Erosion and Sadlmenfal Confrot Plan ITESCPJ designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecafsion vgy's Eroand Sediment Control Requirements, ouf i in Volume 11 of the 2001 Sterrunil Management Manual. Comments on the above application must Ila submitted in writing to Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 43055, by S:CC PM on May 2, 2006, If you have questions about this proposal. or wish to be made a party of record and receive Additional no56cation by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this prcjecl. CONTACT PERSON: Valerie Kinaal, Associate Planner; (426) 430.727D PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION The project will be subs to the City SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9-05C and other .. applicable codes and regulations as aPPropriate. If you would like 10 be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete 'his form and return to. City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton. WA 90055. Nam in ile No SW 34th Street Culvert ReplacemenVLUAU6-Oa2. Si ECF NAME MAILING ADDRESS. TELEPHONE NO, CERTIFICATION I �f P e 124 `? 1 ,hereby ceirtify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on SIGNED: % !' �'` e4t—o �` L-YNN Ili DATE: rs7�'r �c: 3�iy �jlf4 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and For the State of Washington residing in � � , + on the —day of AIp'FARY P BLIC SIG i11,10 ``WAS O CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 181" day of April, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Memo, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners - NOA only See Attached Allen Quynn, City of Renton - Acceptance Memo Owner/Applicant (Signature of Sender}_ STATE OF WASHINGTON } } SS COUNTY OF KING } Juc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:r.- No ary Publi • in and for t Sate of Wa +: q NotaryPrint -° ( ?� My appointment expires: i `t J Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement ►wtz�� Project Number: LUA06-032, SME, ECF template - affidavil of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW - Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept, Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 1601h Ave SE 39015 — 172°d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Trlbal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn- Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Sox C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev, & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev, Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Llason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template - affidavit of service by mailing 125381027007 125381001002 125381002000 ADVENTURE 95 LIMITED PTNRSH ARENSBERG DOUGLAS BEDFORD PROPERTY INVESTORS 299 SW 27TH ST 4430 193RD AV SE ATTN BEVERLY NILSON RENTON WA 98055 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 270 LAFAYETTE CIR LAFAYETTE CA 94549 630850007000 CALSMART LLC 6759 SIERRA CT SUITE E DUBLIN CA 94568 125381008106 RENTON PARTNERS LLC+NORTHWE 9164 SE 54TH PL MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 125381026009 GK SERVICES CO ATTN: TAX DEPT 5995 OPUS PKWY #500 MINNETONKA MN 55343 125381011001 LIND AVENUE INVESTORS LLC 3215 LIND AV SW RENTON WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: April 18, 2006 LAND USE NUMBER% LUA06-032, SME, ECF PROJECT NAME: SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes replacement of four 72-inch diameter culverts with one 10- by 30-foot, 80-foot long box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and SW 34th St. An existing 8" sewer line would be rerouted and gas, power and communications utilities would be relocated. The stream would be diverted temporarily, disturbing an approx. 85- by 140-foot area containing the stream, wetlands and buffer area. The project requires a shoreline exemption and SEPA environmental review. PROJECT LOCATION: Springbrook Creek and SW 34'h Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-Mj: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110. the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 23 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 18, 2006 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Allen Quynn, City of Renton; Tel: (425) 430-7247; Eml: aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Exemption Permit Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits Requested Studies: Stream and Wetlands Study, Habitat Data Report, Geotechnlcal Report, Drainage Control Plan, Wetland Mitigation Plan Location where application may be reviewed: Plan ninglBu1IdinglPubllc Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Fioor Renton City Hall, 1065 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning;Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area Valley (EAV) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Light Industrial (IL) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation, The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-3-050 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. ■ The applicant shall comply with the submitted wetlands mitigation plan. ■ The applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 2, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON; Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner; (426) 430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Name/File No.: SW 34th Street Culvert Replace mentiLUA06-032, SME, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: April 18, 2006 To: Allen Quynn, Utilities From: Valerie Kinast, Development Planning Subject: SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement LUA06-032, SME, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 9, 2006. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 430-7270 if you have any questions. Acceptance Memo 06-032 Act, — 0-42— City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: City or Renton ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON NAME: Allen Quynn COMPANY (if applicable): City of Renton ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 'fv" c 37 006 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425-430-7247, aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: SW 34'r' Street Culvert Replacement Project PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: SW 34'h Street right-of-way crossing of Springbrook Creek KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): SW 34'" Street right-of-way and King County Drainage District No. 1 right-of-way EXISTING LAND USE(S): The project site consists of a culvert crossing (4-72" CMP pipes) at SW 34'r Street. SW 34'h Street is a four -lane road that supports car and truck traffic in an urban and light industrial setting. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): No change proposed EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area - Valley PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): No change proposed EXISTING ZONING: Light Industrial (IL) PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): No change proposed SITE AREA (in square feet): 20,800 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): NIA I:l17ile Svs\I-MI - Surface Water ProjectslSW11-27 - Surface Water IIio'Icdti WIP1',27-;223 SW 34th St Culvert Rep Iawnew Projcc01 00 SEPA',Jwislcrapp_docAAQtp 021111 06 F )JECT INFORMATION (con ued PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: $1,000,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE O AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO A FLOOD HAZARD AREA N 1A sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. (9 HABITAT CONSERVATION wiA -sq. ft. SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. j LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I II (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) The project is located at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and the SW 34th Street right-of-way in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, in: NE Y4 and SE % of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East and NW'/ and SW % of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range rJ East; Willamette Meridian TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review 1000 3. 2. Shoreline Exemption (N/C) 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ HAFile Sys1SWP -Surface Water ProjectslSWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CrP)\27-3223 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement Project11300 SEPAlmasterapp.doclAQtp 02/10/06 MJECT IN FORMATION (contin AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 1, (Print Namels) 1111lev, C - declare that I am (please check one) Zhe current owner of the property involved in this application or the authoriz d representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in ail respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that(A �_ (L] �N, S,AK\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/R res ative) �r (Signature of Owner/Representative) t 191 Notary Public in and for the Mate of Washington PUBI_%G61 2 Notary (Print) _ — �1 if 'xa OF WAS\-'t*C� Ally appointment expires: I 1 a 1 t:lFilc Svs,.SWP- Surface Water Projec1slSWP-27 - Suri'acc Water Prujcci, (( IP) 17-3223 SW 14[h S1 Uulecrt kcpiaccment Prnjectll_ 00 SI:P,1',.mas'ternph.dnc'..1(ltP 021011U 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4,,Dpvelppmel t Planning Section OF ON�Vry� AfAR 2 3 2666 .�EIVED z PROJECT NAME: q 1 u ?q19 tq DATE: 107, 'L 00 Y Q:IWEB%PWID EVS ER V\Forms\Plann inglwaiver.xls 07/29/2005 _EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS I nis requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS PROJECT NAME: 'VW q fL%' 9 T CIA 1 V ft/� P— ("-eW*e DATE: 4 dvI I , Z a 0 0:IWE81PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planninglwaiver.xls 07/29/2005 o& 4 R p�Hiy� Project Narrative ICA �8 The City's SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project proposes to replace four side -by - side and undersized 72-inch-diameter culverts with one 30- by 10-foot four-sided box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and the SW 34th Street crossing in the Renton valley. The project will include removal of existing culverts, dewatering and diversion of water, and installation of a new culvert below the existing streambed, rerouting an existing 8" sewer and relocation of gas, power and communications utilities and reconstruction of SW 34". Required permits include Environmental Review and Shoreline Exemption. The project is located in the City designated land use area of Employment -Valley with a zoning designation of Industrial -Light. The estimated project construction cost is one million dollars. Temporary diversion of creek flow will be required during construction. It is anticipated that two 48-inch-diameter pipes would be sufficient to carry the flow. The Project will require the excavation of 5,947 CY of soil and the subsequent placement of 3,268 CY of fill in order to remove the existing culverts and install the new culvert and replace the roadway. The 3,268 of fill includes on -site excavated material, imported material, subgrade crushed rock, additional fill to subgrade and 277 CY of streambed gravel. The excavation of the four existing 72-inch-diameter culverts will temporarily impact up to 5,331 square feet (0.12 acre) of wetland and associated streambed and 6,387 square feet (0.15 acre) of wetland and stream buffer. Construction equipment will include the following: excavator, dump truck, flatbed truck, mobile crane, dewatering pumps, generator, vibratory sheet pile installation equipment, vibratory compactor, and paver. All access will be via SW 34`h Street_ No off -road access will be required. SW 34th Street or other impervious surfaces will be used as a staging area. Because this project falls under normal maintenance or repair of an existing structure and will improvement fish passage and habitat, it is requested that a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption be issued. oEVELO M o� 14,c oNNING MAR WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. 2 3 2006 ENVIRONWNTAL CHECKLIST i?1ECE, ED Purpose gfchecklist:• T✓ The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C: RC:W, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the t(3overnmcntal agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to deLermining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals. - Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SI tEET FOR NONl'It[].II:C"I ACTIONS (part D), For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A, RACK6ROUND I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: SW 10 Street Culvert Replacement Prgject 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton, Planning/Building/Public Works Department 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: City of Renton Public Works Department 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Allen Quynn; 425-430-7247 4. Date checklist prepared: January 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing, or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The target date for construction is summer 2007. All in -water construction would occur during in -water work window designated by Washington State Department of Fidi and Wildlife (WDFW) in the project Hydraulic. Project Approval (HPA), 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This project is proposed as part of the East Side (ireen River Watershed Plan (ESGRWP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (R,W. Beck, 1997) area -wide pl<mni111_'-level study that identified a number of projects that would help alleviate flooding in the Renton Vallev area, ryenerally bounded by 1-405 to the north, Talbot Road South to the east, SW 431`1 Street to the south, and the Renton city limits to the west. Several flood improvement projects have been implemented including the SW 27t1' Street Culvert Replacement Project (1999), with this project currently a priority. S. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental investigations and documentation include • City of Renton 1997 F,SGRWP and F1S, prepared by R.W. Beck (1997): • City of Renton - 34`1' Street Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Mernorandum, prepared by Jones & Stokes (2005); • Alternatives Analysis, prepared by R.W. Beck (2005); • Surveys and mapping, prepared by Duane I lartman and Associates; • Geotechnical field investilTations, prepared by I IWA GeoSciences, file. (2005)1 ■ Biological Assessment, prepared by Jones & Stokes (2005); and ■ Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application, prepared by ,tones & Stokes (2005). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for-overnmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal" If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed Ior your proposal, if known. • 404 Permit (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) • 401 Water Quality Certification (and temporary Water Quality Modification Permit) (Ecology) • I lydraulic Project Approval (I IPA) (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife) • Shoreline Exemption (City of Renton) ■ Sensitive Areas Ordinance compliance (City of Renton) • Grading permit (City of Renton) A Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (.IARPA) has been prepared by .]ones & Stokes (2005) for this project. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal_ including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this i10rnr to include additional specific information on project description.) The City of Renton's (City's) SW 34"' Street Culvert Replacement Project (Project) proposes to replace four side -by - side 72-inch-diameter culverts with one 30- by 10-tool four-sided box culvert at the intersection of Springbrook Creek and the SW 34"' Street crossing in Renton, W'ashin"ton. The Project is part of a flood protection improvement program identified in the Renton ESGRWP and F.IS (prepared by R.W. Beck [19971). In -water work requiring aquatic permits includes removal of existing culverts, dewaterin- and diversion of water, and installation of a new culvert below the existing streambed. Temporary diversion of creek flow will be required during construction. Construction equipment will include the following: excavator, dump truck, flatbed truck, mobile crane, dcwaterin« pumps, �trenerator, vibratory sheet pile installation equipment, vibratory compactor. and paver. All access will be via SW 34`h Street. No off -road access will be required. SW 34"' Street will be used for project staging, Habitat enhancements, designed in consultation with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, are proposed as part of the culvert replacement project. In -stream enhancements include placement of gravel in the culvert and installation of root wads in alcove pools upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Streamside enhancements include root wads and native plantings associated with the wc.A bank of Springbrook Creek, upstream and downstream of the newly installed culvert. A set of figures showing the Project location_ proposed Project components, and wctlandistrcam resources is included with this submittal and follows the SEPA checklist. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section. township. and ranee, if known. If a proposal would occur over a ranee of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide n legal description, site plan, vicinity neap, and topo4�raphic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist, The project is located at the intersection of Springy,brook Creek and the SW 34'h Street right-of-way in King County, Renton, Washington, in: NE Ya and SE %, of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 Fast NW 'A and SW ''A of Section 30, Township 23 North. Range 5 East; Willamette 'Meridian This segment of SW 34"' Street connects Oaksdale ,Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW, just west of the East Valley Highway. TO BE COMPI.FTF.D BY APPLICANT t VALUATION VOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolliiiL_ hill%, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The Project site is located in a generally flat area (valley bottomland [Renton Valley]). SW 34"' Street is a four -lane arterial (asphalt) with concrete curbs. nutters. and sidewalks on each side. Springbrook Creek flows in a linear channel under SW 34"' Street via four side-h\-side 72-inch-diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culverts. The area immediately adjacent to Springbrook Creek and the culverts is undeveloped palustrine emerbent wetland (vegetation composed of grasses. `needs, with some shrubs adjacent to the outlet end of the crossing). b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The Project site is in a flat area. with the steepest slope being the embankment adjacent to the creek, at approximately 30% slope. c. What general types of soils are lound on the site (fir example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. NRCS Soil Survey (King County) shows Snohomish Loam at the proposed Project site. A ,Coteclinica[ investigation (HWA 2005) indicated approximately 4.5 icet of'fill is underlain by soft organic siltlpeat (lacustrine peat deposits) over alluvium composed of unconsolidated sand, silt, and clay. Very soft estuarine deposits were noted below the alluvium to the full depth of the exploration borings (G 1.5 beet). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no surface indication or history of unstable soils. However, geotechnical investigation (HWA 2005) found liquefiable layers of soil ranging from a total of 6 Ieet thick to 24 feet thick. Unstable soils were identified by subsurface investigations of two exploratory borings to depths of 61.5 feet. Soils are considered to have very low strength and be compressible under placement of fill or heavy struchrr'es. It is estimated that from l to 10 inches of settlement is possible during a seismic event. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The Project will require the trenc.hincy and excavation of 5,947 cubic yards (cy) of soil (see I c, above) and the subsequent placement of 3,265 cy of fill in order to remove the existing culverts and install the new culvert and replace the roadway. The 3,268 cy of fill includes on -.site excavated material, imported material, subgrade crushed rock, additional fill to grade, and 277 cy of streambed c=ravels (clean, rounded gravel with a medium diameter of less than or equal to 2 inches) and improvements. f, Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use'? If so, generally describe. As with any ground clearing and excavation. the erosion hazard will be increased. Excavation erosion may occur when Springbrook Creek flow is diverted around the Project site and again when flows are returned to the channel to flow though the new box culvert. Temporary diversion and culvert installation increase the risk of erosion. The temporary diversion culvert may also increase the risk of.streambed erosion at the culvert. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)'' No change. SW 34111 Street will be reconstructed within its existing footprint. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Cofferdams installed to isolate the Project From 5pringbrook Creek will prevent sediment disturbed during culvert installation from affecting Springbrook Creek. Measures to reduce or control erosion include implementation of construction best management practices (13MPs) (e.`g.. careful grading practices, isolating 4vork area from streamflow, silt fences and/straw bales, storrn drain sediment filters) and implementation of the recommendations in the Wet Weather Earthwork section of the HWA geotechnical report. f3MPs specific to in -water work will be used to minimise erosion and sediments that could potentially- cause harm to fish. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Spill Prevention, Control, and Containment (SPCC) Plan «il I be prepared for the project. The roadway will be used for Project staging. Excavated soil may be temporarily stockpiled on the roadway or at an upland site away from the construction area during_= culvert installation. All soil stockpiles and vehicle fueling and equipment staging areas will be located at least 150 feet From surface waters. a. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Potential emissions include dust associated �%ith movinc= soil on the site during the earthwork phase (e.g., land clearing, excavation), The extent of dust emitted to the air at any given time is dependent on level of activity. soil content and moisture, wind speed, and type of equipment. Emissions also include equipment exhaust and short-term odors associated with some construction activities (e.g., asphalt paving) in close proximity to the site. b, Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that maN affect your proposal`? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Possible BMPs to reduce or control emissions include: ' cover, wet, or lower freeboard on materials transported by truck; • clear roadways of mud and particulate matter (street sweeping); ■ route and schedule construction truck activity to avoid traffic delays and congestion to abate concentrations of exhaust emissions; and ■ revegetate exposed soils as quickly as possible aller grading activities; • stabilized construction entrance with wheel w ashiri 1 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the inmmediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater. lakes. ponds. wetlands)? if yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Wetlands and other waters of the U.S. have been delineated on the Project site by Jones & Stokes (2005). Springbrook Creek flows through the Project site and is designated a Shoreline of the State. As such, Springbrook Creek is a Class l stream by Renton code. having a I00-foot buffer. Two narrow, riverine, flow -through wetlands exist along Springbrook Creek at the site. Both wetlands are classified as palustrine emergent (Cowardin ct al 1979) and meet Washington State Department of Ecology's (Fcology's) definition of a Category 3 wetland and the City of Renton's definition of a Category 2 wetland (Renton Code 4-3-050). Renton Code assigns a 5046ut buffer to Category 2 wetlands in the City of Renton. These wetlands are hydrologically supported by the hit}Ir groundwater table and high flows associated with the creek. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (%%ithin 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the majority of work will occur over and within Springbrook Creek and its associated wetlands at the intersection with SW 34''' Street. A total of 5.331 square feet (0. 12 acre) of wetland area (5,041 below the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) and 290 above the OHWM) would be temporarily affected. A total of 6,387 square feet (0.15 acre) of wetland and stream buffer would be temporarily affected. All in -stream work will be completed within the approved in -water construction window. Prior to beginning any in - stream work, National Marine Fisheries Service (NC)AA Fisheries) fish exclusion protocols will be implemented to remove and exclude fish from the work area. 1=ollowino fish removal and exclusion, cofferdams will be installed to isolate the construction area. Springbrook Creek will be diverted around the existing and future culvert location through two 48-inch-diameter CMPs. The construction area will need to be dewatered prior- to culvert replacement. The dewatering discharge will be treated in a Baker Tank prior to discharge back to Springbrook Creek. if necessary, to meet state water quality standards. If dewatering water exceeds state water quality standards, the discharge will be relocated to an authorized discharge location for water quality treatment (e.g., sanitary sewer). 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of'thc site that would be affected. Indicate the source of till material. The project will require the trenching and excavation of S,947 cy of soil (see l c. above) and the subsequent placement of 3,268 cy of fill in order to remove the existing culxer'ts and install the new culvert and replace the roadway. Of this, 100 cy will be excavated from Wetland 1, and 160 cv will be excavated from Wetland 2. No till will be placed in either Wetland 1 or in Wetland 2. Fill includes 277 cv of streambed gravels and improvements. Fill material will be on -site excavated materials. imported backfill, subgrade crushed rock backfill, and streambed gravel (clean, rounded gravel with a medium diameter of less than or equal to 2 inches) and improvements. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities ii'knm%ii. Stream diversion and dewatering will be required. See response to 3.a.2 above. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year Iloodplain? I f'so, note location on the site. plan. Yes. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge, The Project will not discharge any waste materials to surface waters. As noted above in B.1.h, all vehicle fueling, soil stockpiling, and equipment staging areas will be located at least 150 feet from surface waters. b. Ground: 1} Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Groundwater will be withdrawn for excavation dewatcrim,. See 3.a.2 above. Water withdrawn to dewater the Project site %will be discharged to Springbrook Creek downstream of the construction area, The turbidity of the dewatering discharge N01 be checked periodically. It' turbidity would cause a water quality violation, the discharge will be routed to a Bakes- "Tank for filtration or disposal through the sanitary sewer system. In the event that dewatering causes undesirable ground subsidence, dewatering discharge may be reinjected into groundwater at selected locations in the Project vicinity to prevem excessive settling. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the around from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chernicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the f_,eneral size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NIA c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm �i ater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if kno4%,O, Where will this water flow'! Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The Project will not expand the existing roadway : however, the changes in topography created by culvert installation will require installation of four new storm drains. Runoff from the roadway will be collected at the new storm drains to be located at the low points in the new roadway. Storm drains will be connected to the existing stormwater system, draining to Springhrook Creek, 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? 1 f so, generally describe. During construction, there is the potential tier- waste material to enter the surface water system, primarily petroleum hydrocarbons from construction equipment. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, gromid, and runoff water impacts, if any: The contractor will be required to isolate the work area from strearntlow during construction and provide a Spill Prevention, Control, and Containment (SPCC) Plan. flte plan would include specific notification procedures, cleanup and disposal instructions for different products, and quick -response control, containment, and cleanup measures that will be available on -site prior to the start of construction. As noted above in B.1.It, all vehicle fueling and equipment staging areas will be located at least 150 feet from surface waxers: erosion and sediment control BMPs would be used to reduce and control sediment impacts. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, othcr_(whitQ poplar evergreen tree: fir, cedar,. pine, other X shrubs (white poplar and Himalayan black hcrr�j X grass (reed canarygrass covers the majority of the :ite) pasture crop orgrain X_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other (reedcaitaryzg,rass, stinging, nettle, bitter ni-dhtshade_ poison hemlock) water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or :filtered? Primarily herbaceous .gasses (e_g_, reed canary r<i s), weeds, and shrubby white poplar will be removed. No mature or conifer trees will be removed. Plants have been identified in the Wetland Delineation Report prepared lip• this Project. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Stream enhancement will include root wads and plantings of native shrubs and trees. Other bare soil areas will be hydroseedcd. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, , other: {birds common to rurban areas je_s__ crows]) mammals: deer, bear, elk, heaver, other: (likely mall mammals .inch as rodents) fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (chinook salmon, cohn salmon, cutthroat_ stcdhead} b. List any threatened or endangered species knot,%n to be on or near the site. There is the potential for chinook salmon (threatened) and bald eagles (threatened) (closest nest is 2 miles away) to be in the Project vicinity. Although no bull trout have been documented in the Springbrook Creek subbasin, they have been recorded occasionally in the Green/Duwamish River and could, therefore, enter Springbrook Creek. A biological assessment has been prepared for this Project. E il'cct determinations include a "may affect but is not likely to adversely affect'' chinook salmon or designated Critical 1 labitat. a "no effect" on Coastaf",Puget Sound bull trout, and "no ell'ect" on bald eagles, c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes_ The project resides within the Puget Sound region, which is within the Pacific Flyway for migrating birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if,,nv: The new culvert would provide improved passa{-c for fish by reducing high flow velocity. Substrate conditions would be enhanced with placement of streambed gravel and improvements within the culvert. Streamside habitat enhancements would include two root wads in oft channel pool areas with overhanging native plantings. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, scalar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturin4-, etc. NIA b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal" List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including cspusurc to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Ifso, describe. A 4-inch natural gas pipeline will be relocated from its current location above the existing culvert to a new location below the culvert. This line will be shut off and cleared prior to relocation to prevent risk of explosion. Likewise, a section of 8-inch sanitary sewer over the existing culvert will be flushed and drained prior to removal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Instructions on how to deal with contamination. if encountered, and how to properly handle, segregate, and dispose of any contaminated soil and groundwater will be provided in a construction contingency plan prepared for the Project. The plan will also address dewatering discharge. if necessary. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Worker and public safety issues will be addressed in the construction contingency plan prepared for the Project. Minimum personnel certification requirements, physical and chemical hazards of known or potential contaminants possibly encountered during the Project, means to minimize exposure, personnel monitoring requirements, and emergency procedures to be implemented, if required. N,%,ill be included. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. The Project site resides within an area of li-ht industry. Noise levels include vehicular and semi -truck traffic routed by or through the Project area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: troll ic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Increased short-term noise levels would occur from heavy construction equipment (e.g., excavator, dump trucks, drilling rig, dewatering pumps, generator, vibratory compactor, paver) during working hours throughout the construction period. Construction hours would occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday (Ordinance 4703, 2-2-1998). 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. ifany: None. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently a 4-lane arterial, with gutters ;ind sidewalks on both sides, crossing over Springbrook Creek. light industrial/commercial business occurs at adjacent properties. b. I1as the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Although the site is not currently used for agricultus e. historically, the majority of the valley has been [armed. c. Describe any structures on the site. The only structure on -site is the SW 34'1' Street arterial crossing, which is an earthen berm with four culverts. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the roadway and culverts will be demolished prior to replacement. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site" Industrial - light, f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of'thc site'' Employment Area - Valley t�. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master pro_r deli,nation of the site'? Springbrook Creek is designated a Shoreline of the State. As such, the creek is rated a Class I with a I00-foot buffer by the City of Renton. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes.. Springbrook Creek and its associated 100-N,crir Iloodplain, along with 5,331 square feet (0.12 acre) of Category 3 (Ecology) flow -through riverine wetlands (classified as palustrine emergent wetlands [Cowardin et al. 1979]) associated with Springbrook Creek. The wetlands are classified Category 2 by the City of Renton. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. Use of the property would include vehicular and pedestrian traffic over the SW 34"' Street arterial crossincr and pedestrian use along the Springbrook Creek Trail. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. il'any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible vrith existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The Project would replace the existing culvert and road%vay with new culvert and roadway: therefore, land use of the site would not be altered. The Project is included in the Cit 's ESGRWP. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provide(]. if aim_ ? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if an\: NIA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(.$), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The SW 34'1' Street roadway may be reconstructed to a height 23 feet higher than what currently exists. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the immediate vicinity would not he altered or obstructed by implementation of the culvert replacement. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: New features of the replacement culvert and road%ray `%ill be similar to those that currently exist. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or .Aare will the proposal produce`' What time of day Would it mainly occur! None. Concrete and painted surfaces would not he hi,,hi\ reflective. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a sal�t� hazard or interfere with views? No. c, What existing off -site sources of light or Aare may Lilted VOur proposal? 10 None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: N/A. The Project would use materials common to roadway stream crossings and would meet City code. 12. Recreation a. What desi-nated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity" Recreational opportunities include the Sprin,rbrook Creek Trail (e.g., walking, bicycling, bird watching) and Springbrook Creek (e.g., fishing). b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses:' If so, describe. No. c, Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed lor.. national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, (,enerally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, il'anv: NIA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The Project will occur on a segment of SW 34"' Street between Oaksdale Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop`? There are no transit stops within the Project limits of culvert and roadway replacement. The nearest transit stop is located at SW 34"' Street and Lind Avenue SW (Route 153), This intersection is approximately 800 feet from the limits of paving. Construction associated with relocation oftlhe sanitary sewer would extend to Lind Avenue SW. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have'.' How many would the project climinate" N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)_ No new roads or streets are proposed with the Project. The existing SW 34`h Street arterial will be reconstructed after the new culvert is installed. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ol) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. IIM f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NIA. Vehicular trips would be comparable to existing conditions. Peak volumes would likely be during commuting hours. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA. Impacts to traffic during the construction period controlled through rerouting or phased construction. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so. generally describe. No- b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse serv- ice, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utilities include sanitary sewer (City of Renton), water (City of Renton), natural gas (Puget Sound Energy), buried electric (Puget Sound Energy), and communication (Qwest). b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities are proposed. The existing sewer line would be relocated away from the Project site_ The water main would be placed in a protective pipe located on the north (downstream) face of the culvert structure. The other utilities would be relocated beneath the new culvert. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying onthemto make its d ision. Signature: ........ (r 1.. ... ... 7,v7 ...................................................................................................................... DateSubmitted: ...... 3I r. , . �� ...................................................................................................................... 12 C-4UPMENT OF r?EiWb�j Construction Mitigation Description MAR 2 3 2006 � EI VLZIi Project Construction Dates The SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project is scheduled for construction in the summer of 2006. Project construction will most likely begin in June with project completion in September. However, the conditions specified in the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA permit will restrict the in -stream construction work between June 15 and September 30. Hours of Operation It is anticipated that the contractor will work from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through Friday. If the Contractor requests to work outside of these hours, the Contractor will need to obtain written approval from the City. Propose Hauling/Transportation Routes Since the project is located on SW 341h Street, truck traffic to and from the site will be routed to either Lind Ave. SW or Oakesdale Ave. SW for access to 1-405 or SR-167. Based on the City's haul route map, there are no route restrictions for trucks traveling sorthbound. For northbound travel, trucks will be required to use Grady Way when accessing from Lind Ave. SW or Oakesdale Ave. SW. Construction Mitigation Measures Dust: To minimize dust, the following best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented: 1. Cover, wet or lower freeboard of materials transported by truck. 2. Conduct street sweeping at the end of the workday. 3. InstalI and utilize stabilized construction entrance with wheel wash -down for trucks exiting the site. 4. Re -vegetate exposed soils as quickly as possible after grading activities. Traffic: Prior to construction, the Contractor will be required to submit a traffic control plan to the City for review and approval. The traffic control plan may require the Contractor to haul during hours when traffic flow is minimized, such as during off-peak hours. Road Closure: In order to reduce the number of working days and thus the construction costs and impacts to businesses, one option that is being considered is to close off SW 34`h Street to through traffic at the culvert crossing. Traffic would still have access to SW 34a` Street from Oakesdale Ave. SW and Lind Ave. SW but would not have eastbound or westbound access across Springbrook Creek within the project construction limits. The Contractor will need to maintain local access to businesses along SW 34`h Street at all times during construction. Any road closure; however, will require approval from the City Council and the Fire Marshall. Construction Mitigation March 14, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Erosion: To minimize the amount of erosion during construction, the Contractor will be required to isolate the work area from the stream and install erosion and sediment control BMPs, such as silt fence and temporary catch basin inserts, to prevent silt and turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek. Toxic Chemicals: The Contractor will prepare a Spill Prevention Control Plan (SPCC), which must be approved by the City prior to beginning construction. The SPCC must explain how the Contractor will prevent, control and contain an accidental spill of hazardous material. The SPCC must include the following elements: 1. All hazardous materials will be stored on land in containers clearly labeled with the contents and appropriate for the specific material. Containers will be stored in areas with appropriate safeguards (under cover, on an impervious surface). 2. No fueling or maintenance of construction equipment shall occur within 150 feet of surface waters. 3. Personnel who transfer, or otherwise handle hazardous materials, will be trained in the safe handling of the materials. They will have knowledge of the SPCC Plan as well as the procedures and equipment necessary to initiate control and containment of a spill. 4. There will be daily inspections of equipment and hazardous materials storage areas. 5. If an accidental spill occurs, on -site personnel will immediately initiate measures to control the source of the spill and contain the spilled material. 6. Materials necessary for the control and containment of a spill of hazardous materials will include, but may not be limited to, oil -absorbent booms, oil -absorbent rags, and other appropriate absorbent materials. 7. All materials necessary for the control and containment of hazardous materials will be kept within the Project corridor, and personnel will be knowledgeable of their locations and their manner of use. 8. If an accidental spill of hazardous materials occurs, the appropriate agencies will be notified. 9. Control and containment efforts will take precedence over all other Project -related work. Work will not resume until a spill has been contained and cleaned up; the cause of the spill identified, and measures are taken to rectify the problem. 10. Materials used in control and containment efforts will be collected and disposed of at an approved facility designed for the safe handling of hazardous materials. Noise: Increased short-term noise levels will occur from construction equipment such as dump trucks, dewatering pumps, generators, vibratory compactor, and excavator. The project is located in a light industrial area where background noise levels are expected to be of similar anticipated levels from construction equipment. Since the use of trucks and other equipment will be restricted to working hours, noise mitigation measures are not proposed at this time. If noise becomes a problem during construction, the Contractor may be required to use dump trucks with lined beds, or backup lights in lieu of backup beepers to reduce excessive noise. H.-Tile SysISWP - Surface Water ProjectslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3223 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement ProjecA1300 SEPAlconstruction mitigation.doc DEVELC)pMENT pLMMJjj'G CITY OF IPENT6�1 MAR Z 3 2006 REcIiIVED Technical Memorandum City of Renton - 34th Street Culvert Replacement Weiland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Prepared for: R.W. Beck 10014th Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98154-1004 Prepared by: Jones & stakes 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 May 24, 2005 1 City of Renton - 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum Prepared for: R.W. Beck 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98154-1004 Contact: Michael Giseburt Prepared by: 4S Jones & Stokes 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Contact: Andy Wones 425/822-1077 May 24, 2005 This document should be cited as: Jones & Stokes. 2005, 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum. May 24. (AS 06287.05.) Renton, WA. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction..........................................................1 Chapter2. Methods................................................................1 2.1. Waters and Wetlands.............................................................1 Chapter3. Results.................................................................. 2 11. Wetland 1...............................................................................2 3.1.1. Vegetation.................................................................3 Hydrology.......................................................................... 3 Soils-- ............................................................................ 3 Upland Conditions............................................................3 3.2. Wetland 2...............................................................................3 3.2.1. Vegetation.................................................................4 Hydrology............................ -...........................................4 Soils.................................................................................. 4 Upland Conditions............................................................4 3.3. Stream Reconnaissance........................................................4 Chapter 4. Regulatory Issues ................................................ 5 Chapter 5. References............................................................ 6 May 24, 2005 List "Ut of Figures Following Page Figure 1- Regional Vicinity Map nfProject Area ............................................... ....................... 3 Figure2.Site Drawing -----............................................................................................... ^~^~ List f ��.�"U�� ces Appendix A. Corps Data Forms Appendix B. Ecology Wetland Rating Forms City of Renton —ED Chapter 1. Introduction This technical memorandum describes a wetland delineation conducted for the City of Renton, along Springbrook Creek where it crosses 34th Street. The project area is located in Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E; and Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E (Figure 1). The purpose of this work is to provide baseline information for environmental permits required for replacement of the culverts at 34th Street. Two wetlands were identified and delineated along each side of Springbrook Creek, upstream and downstream of 34th Street_ Springbrook Creek was straightened in this area, and the wetlands run along both sides of the stream. Both wetlands meet the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) definition of a Category III wetland, for which the City Code (4-3-050) requires 50-foot buffers. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) was delineated along the banks of Springbrook Creek 100 feet upstream and downstream of 34th Street. The delineation methods and both wetlands are described in detail below. Chapter 2. Methods 2.1. Waters and Wetlands On April 19, 2005, Jones & Stokes biologists conducted a wetland delineation along Springbrook Creek, 100 feet upstream and downstream of 34th Street. The biologists used delineation methods from the Corps' Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington Department of Ecology 1997). Both manuals require the presence of wetland indicators for vegetation, hydrology, and soils before an area is considered a wetland. Orange flagging was hung to indicate the edge of the wetland area. Red and white striped flagging was hung to indicate the location of sample plots. Flags were numbered in sequence on each side of the stream, May 24, 2005 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum Wetland habitat types are based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979), which categorizes wetlands according to plant community types and hydrologic regime. This system is commonly used by local jurisdictions to help determine wetland functions and values. Wetlands ratings were based on Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Rating System — Western Washington (Ecology 2004) and the City of Renton's wetland classification system (Renton Code 4-3-050). The OHWM along Springbrook Creek was delineated based on evidence of frequent inundation, including: scour, water -stained vegetation, water staining of culverts, and deposition of drifting vegetative debris. The regulatory definition of ordinary high water, is found in RMC 4-11-150: "On lakes and streams, that mark found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland..." Chapter 3. Results Jones & Stokes biologist identified and delineated two wetlands within the project area. Both wetlands are narrow, straight riparian wetlands along Springbrook Creek. The biological and physical features associated with both wetlands are described below. OHWM followed very closely to the wetland boundaries. Wetlands and OHWM are shown graphically in Figure 2. 3.1. Wetland 'I Wetland 1 is a narrow riparian wetland that runs along both sides of Springbrook Creek upstream of 34th. Wetlands on both sides of a narrow stream (less than 50 feet) can be considered one unit, with the creek a characteristic of the wetland (Hruby 2004). In the project area, the wetland is dominated by palustrine emergent (PEM) habitat. Wetland hydrology is supported by high flows of Springbrook Creek and groundwater. Wetland 1 meets Ecology's definition of a Category III wetland and the City of Renton's definition of a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2200 square feet and is not isolated (associated with Springbrook Creek). Wetland 1 is not City of Renton 1 Jones & Stokes Figure I - Regional Vicinity Map of Project Area SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project 1 �' WM1E9ElE vH WETLJWD BUFFER (50 FTFQ - ` 6., �•"" �•eFN �4•oWN I�aFL WETLAND 1 -- 16�^�' -^` ---- -\ IWITLF 5WN'ACE i �,DO FEET , ] 1r -k - --•H ,•.,ter _ -�E� -- AAI! a sur!ru� I! cl rErr ST1e�ODl( CT+mf 3� Ir A.'. a` Ate' r�VL I�OVNC NEW AND CUP 6'GF 6'R1 FR LC �� plr EL Is WETLMD BUFFER (50 F" CONON7TT' S[ALF EOEa�rc scAlE 4 4' tm IE 9.97 E g M t5 47 OWIB:E7 IN 166.9K. 6 9 q N 1$5,510.50 0 E I,29 k 11.90 clvA7!ew leso rEE1M 1a01 2. -1 C11' N -1171 i1C19N I C of WF AT If,{ CEMYR 0i AMSECTON WITH SW 311 SIRrr M'0 WSI. E Ay: Sw. SWvEY i '0,U1 MIA 35 PW zie,29. Kti ,$,7a ELEVA'i 19_50! us SAgyLY fEF I. T 1 E2 a SSAYI aw ,9za E E 13.Si I: W 13!6 iI cFANWL:2o xw- AR CG4REIE W/+T. WAY 188.987.OE25 i95,S55_FdOZ_ � xA1K g ASPW l ctc a 1a67 COLT EL T5.84 �I g5g i qT y 75 1 r1 sn4v v�lvEal �: L'IAr' 310.au C!H v�FI 1 Ne 1 N 7.6E R 15 SA BICT II SI 1 eRF 2gL.1.Y]5 is AT Fx +Ey Fr]n f[Aa fw" . N 1E8,9686C52 ,6C52 E 1.295,541,6269 1 E1 WHQN 16.57 FEET ASwu17 a a THE NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST AND THE NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTHWEST OF SECION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON c vx C9 ttFE 4oA 19.Sa R AE x 1.a6 wxK R 11.6a BOT 15 87 AS�wr J {�✓�/y WE W" BUFFER (50 ff-M e'OPII �`] 4PIf ECC Fw s9.A5 R I11.2 3a! 1.25 �.1 tx gl 14000" cmmc .... -.is •'M- IC9) RL -'+ram Ar 2P0 F.N_ CN OA/Iailpu -E•12 7� �"• -6.9 5 a9R-r0 1a 5 ce imE i Mom` ;P Po91 17.4 IC S 1141 �•�� w. T2I +� stw aar "11 IAA Ta-16 AWMA11 TRAk s e 74 M_ :O.I6 SEl 67,1PX S35 801 8.I4 10_n .295.U.79{] � C ! 9$,545 5P59 o =EMATO UV Ten 8 7�-1 We • ��. •WEFWM BUFFER (50 FEET) N 1464YSr.E2✓E w 14 5 CIOAMU 2_M1 .CLT-UP Er4T-LV9lF Wozos'snl; U-NO AVENUE SW INlE%a aA�xx -� A'UryS•4at 2594.%6 IN=CNftlElE 70WT1 1017 IO' O M10 TACT( IN !FM N CaN[PCIE �"� 0.5' k CASE IIfAlICfIL 00W11 0.7' N CASE EdINO TACK k IFA In- NfR�CE7TIE 80A'M� MOF PEHfaN WANLW i 160. T5E1 a.6, P7 CASL a7 u rimm N)!•11 1LMTlcw i0 00 FEEE' 40, 1551 E1MMN 2t.72 raj NQ TES HMZOffTAL �LYID MOM Al MAN 6ANM W/01. 161D NORM W35W EAST M EEN MONJILEIIIS Al THE MfERMCIIOM OF LIM AYFME SW AM Syr MM ST(NOT OPEN) AND LAND AFTIUE SM AAD 5W 2= ST(MM MEN)_ WRIH A GrM t'r.RTM OT M S& HELD CM OF RE71M FENIAEJIr NO. I861 AT TIE MfUMCRONS OF LMD AYFMIE SK AM SW 3OTH ST(NOr OPFM ELVOM 20,00 FEET AM YONLYENT NO. IMI AT LID AMC SM' AND SW 23FD Sr(NOT OPEN) F1MION 21-V FEET. VW R11j1: 7OP NORTIIMEST RASE 90LT OF L16HT SWMM t126 FEET FAST OF THE CDffERLK OF SPRINGBIRDOK QM ON NMM SEE OF 34TH STREET SOLMNEM ELLAA710N 1e102 FEET 01M Mk 3ASM SOWS AT 5QUNEIST MRN R CQNWW TRAMSFORAER• 1175 FEET WEST OF 711I4RROON CREEK DFMEItl.1E AHD 12.0 FEET NORTH OF GXX OF MAFIF ON NORM SEE SDVMWEsr 34TH STREET. FIEIMTIOM 21.10 FEET 7 E FMP SHOM'N NOUN IS THE REM OF A TMOCf IPHK SPAY AY MAINE HM" a ASSOCMTES" NC. Pik) COII LM ON VM 21. 2005. AL DMMO UTUM %MN HUM MERE FIETD TED AS A RESULT OF A UMM Wiff- UT fMNG 1TE COURSE OF THE FELD WW D1EME 1NHTMN A ASSOCIATES, NQ. (OEM) AMMES NO LM M FOR TFE M. AWY OF THE MM NW-" M MAIM NO FM<i M. BE1 O SO CATF FOR ANY FURIE SUPFAM FEISMFE M WKAlM OR IAH15TMMM ACIMHES RKT IMY 0006R NTIFIM OR AWOMM THE PERMETER OF THIS SURVEY. CORTAM OHM (425%463-M) FOR SM LNUTS ATD VEWICJOIOTS. --. -'•- ROAD CIEKTUMHE 6 MONUMENT N CASE RMD WO-W-WAY 4b- PROJECT BmHWARK RXA) 1G x PK NAL (CDfTIR(x) FENCE LW 4 FEW AID CAP T..-•`-- ""�' "•••,-- DOWDIM 1NTERYAL (2 FEET) i CULVERT WHIM MM (10 FEET} 13 5'IDRY WIN CAM 9ASN •- - - - - - WEIIANO B MIpA1TT R STORY Mm CiEmm r • • ME11MO 0.FFER (50 FEET) ST m OM-M W mm om BULDI0 COMFER TREE CLF OWN L Mr FEKE OECOUDIUS TREE CONO CON EM 'm SAAF OIIP ODRRLWJITM PETAL PPE Pawl ELC EYTMIDED CONCRETE am sAMTAIiL' sE1 WIMjpEE SCALE ORN O*V"AL yt _0 t C""�` MM POLE VM MW clip ORDROM HM WATER 1101E POLE PYC F4LYdit CFLOREE PK A NATFR NFORI01r SP SOL FILM M SM ME SO1M STDTit1 am MANGLE & M CROMii F" SSW SANTTM SBER MWME P K-11 ND FUC 0i4i.W ��d:.��v� 0�1♦ T CITY OF RENTON 34TH ST. i RENTON CULVERT PFar�IL�PUbW. Works � REPLACEMENT PROJECT DWG- ATE I Figure 2. Site Drawing 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum severely disturbed (Category 3 wetland), and does not possess the high quality attributes of a Category 1 wetland. The City of Renton requires that Type 2 wetlands are given a 50-foot buffer. 3.1.1. Vegetation The wetland is completely dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) with occasional stinging nettles (Urtica dioica). In two field sample plots, over 50% of the dominant vegetation had a wetland indicator status of "FAC" or wetter. This field indicator meets the Corps requirements for evidence of wetland hydrophytic vegetation. Hydrology The hydrology of Wetland I is associated with a high groundwater table and high flows of Springbrook Creek. One sample plot was saturated to the surface while another was saturated to the surface with standing water 8 inches below the surface. Standing water and saturation in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile meet the Corps requirements for evidence of wetland hydrology. Solis Two soil samples were taken along the wetland delineation boundary. One sample had a low chroma value of I in the upper 10 inches of the soil horizon. The other sample had a chroma value of 1 in the top 10 inches with mottles. Chroma values of I with or without mottling in the upper 10 inches meet the Corps requirement for hydric soils. Upland Conditions Upland conditions around Wetland I begin with a change in vegetation that coincides with the topographic break at the toe of the hiilslope that runs the entire length of Springbrook Creek. Upland habitat is dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) on the west side, and various invasive herbs and shrubs on the east side. Vegetation observed includes Himalayan blackberry, stinging nettle, reed canarygrass, catchweed (Galium aparine), bitter nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), poison -hemlock (Conium maculatum), and silver cottonwood (Populus alba). 3.2. Wetland 2 Wetland 2, similar to Wetland 1, is a narrow, riverine, flowthrough wetland that runs along both sides of Springbrook Creek downstream of 34s' Street. Like Wetland 1, Wetland 2 is considered one unit. In the project area, the wetland is dominated by palustrine emergent (PEM) habitat. Wetland hydrology is supported by high flows of Springbrook Creek and groundwater. s - May 24, 2005 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum Wetland 2 meets Ecology's definition of a Category III wetland and the City of Renton's definition of a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2200 square feet, is not isolated (associated with Springbrook Creek), is not severely disturbed (Category 3 wetland), and does not possess the high quality attributes of a Category 1 wetland. Type 2 wetlands in the City of Renton are given a 50-foot buffer. 3.2.1. Vegetation Wetland 2 is completely dominated by reed canarygrass. Therefore, in the two field sample plots, over 50% of the dominant vegetation had a wetland indicator status of "FAC" or wetter. This field indicator meets the Corps requirements for evidence of wetland hydrophytic vegetation. Hydrology The hydrology of Wetland 2 is associated with a high groundwater table and high flows of Springbrook Creek. One sample plot was saturated to the surface while another was saturated to the surface with standing water 4 inches below the surface. Standing water and saturation in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile meet the Corps requirements for evidence of wetland hydrology. Soils Two soil samples were taken along the wetland delineation boundary. One sample i had a Iow chroma value of I in the upper 10 inches of the soil horizon. The other sample had a chroma value of 2 in the top 10 inches with mottles. Chroma values of 1 and chroma values of 2 with mottling in the upper 10 inches meet the Corps requirement for hydric soils. Upland Conditions Upland conditions around Wetland 2 begin with a change in vegetation that coincides with the topographic break at the toe of the hillslope that runs the entire length of Springbrook Creek. Upland habitat is dominated by Himalayan blackberry on the west side, and mostly mowed/bare ground on the east side. Vegetation observed includes Himalayan blackberry and reed canarygrass. 3.3. Stream Reconnaissance Washington State has designated Springbrook Creek a Shoreline of the State (WAC 173-18-210). As a Shoreline of the State, Renton classifies Springbrook Creek as a Class I stream with a standard buffer width of 100 feet. In the vicinity of 34"' Street, Springbrook Creek is a modified straight, trapezoidal, channel. Riparian vegetation is limited, dominated by reed canarygrass. Several small (1- to 5-inch diameter) willows grow to the north of 341h Street, between 30 Street and the outlet of the City of Renton `4 --—� 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum existing Sprinbrook Creek culverts. Stream gradient is low, and habitat is essentially one long glide. In places, reed canarygrass has invaded the active channel. Stream substrate is primarily a mixture of gravel and sand with some finer sediment. The existing culverts at 34'h Street are low gradient and do not appear to impair fish passage under normal flows. Salmon and trout are known to spawn upstream of the site. Kerwin & Nelson (2000) report chinook salmon, coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and steelhead trout all use Springbrook Creek and its tributary Mill Creek, located well upstream of 34th Street. Although velocity through the existing 34th Street culverts would be highest during peak flows, it is likely that even at peak flows, the culverts do not prevent fish passage. However, no velocity measurements have been taken to confirm this supposition. As is typical of modified urban streams, Springbrook Creek contains little woody debris or other habitat forming structure. No large woody debris was found in the stream or along its banks for at least 200 feet upstream or downstream of 34`h Street, on April 19, 2005. Chapter 4. Regulatory Issues Several federal, state, and local regulations affect activities in wetland areas and their buffers. Agencies that have jurisdiction over activities in wetlands include, but may not be limited to: • Corps ■ Ecology; and • City of Renton. The Corps administers Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which regulates the discharge of dredged or fill materials into Waters of the United States, including wetlands. For projects requiring Section 404 Permits, the Corps makes the final determination as to whether the area meets the definition of a jurisdictional wetland. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires applicants for Section 404 permits to obtain 401 water quality certification from the appropriate certifying agency. In Washington, that agency is the Ecology. Section 401 certification ensures that projects discharging to Waters of the United States, including wetlands, fall within specific water quality standards. Conditions of the 401 Certification become May 24, 2005 Im 34th Street Culvert Replacement Wetland Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum conditions of the Corps 404 Permit. Project information should be submitted to Ecology for approval. Applicable City of Renton regulations include RMC Title IV - Development Regulations: Chapter 3 (Environmental Regulations) and Chapter 4 (Property Development Standards). Section 404 and 401 Permits require the submittal of a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) to the above -mentioned agencies for approval before initiating any activities within the wetland identified on -site. Depending on the proposed activity that occurs in the wetland, a wetland report and wetland mitigation plan are typically requested by the Corps, Ecology, and the local jurisdiction, as part of the JARPA submittal. Chapter 5. References Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. (FWS/OBS-79/31.) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. (Technical Report 4-87-1.) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State wetland rating system for western Washington — Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #04-06-025. Kerwin, John and Nelson, Tom S. (Eds.). December 2000. "Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assessment Report, Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watersheds (WRIA 9 and Vashon Island)." Washington Conservation Commission and the King County Department of Natural Resources. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: northwest (Region 9). St. Petersburg, FL. Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetland inventory, Washington, DC. Renton, City of. Municipal Code Chapter 4-3-050 — Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts. Washington Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington state wetlands identification and delineation manual. (Publication No. 96 94.) March. Olympia, WA. City of Renton..-- Appendix A Corps Data Forms DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Projed/Site: _5f�l��G i(� f t �C� Date: _ _ 1/ 40_5 ~ Applicant/Owner. '!C t°.y[ Counly I!I CT Invest' at s .Slate:. Do normal circumstances exist on site? Yes No Community 1D: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes ANo Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? If needed, explain on reverse. Yes Plot in, VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. arm rkd#'mcea9 G s. 2.UtfrCct y iG 3. 11. 4. 12. - 5. 13- 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. • Dorrrnanr Spectres................................................................................_................... ._...--...._. �................ _....-........-....-.._.. / Percerd of dominant species that are OHL, FACW or FAC fexcluding FAC- . �• f l d / y' Remarks:+QGt' 14Yr RDI OGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other _Z4o Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soll: Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _ Water )darts Drill Lines _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Secondary indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches Water -Stained Leaves (in.) __� Local Soll Survey Data �_ FAC-Neutral Test f (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks_, f�a !�'ds�f� �t%� /l /� r'��'vf�� l /" � rjrrege,< ►r� C � SOILS Map Unit Name `' ( #dy �, Lkxo(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: 41!4 Field Observations Matrix Color Mottle colors Mottle Hydric Soil Indicators: Hlstosot HWk Epipedon Sulrldic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION etc. Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer In Sandy Soils Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils Ust Listed on National Hydric Ws Lid Other (lain In Remarks) Hydrophybc Vegetation Present? No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydrae Sills Presort? AY.- No Is this samplins Remarks: k%/ v,�A I khp � ✓ /� Gtr r sCr' a �lP �Nl vat +J it Pu Ye (Clnale) nt within a wetland? Yes No Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 GOE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: �% 5 f r Date: I�A—f 0. 5� A 0icant/Owner: C R f K 1 County: 1< AJ67 Invest aior(s)_ J CrVV State: - Do normal circumstances exist on site? Yes No Community ID: up _ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical sduation)7 Yes Transect ID: n Is the area a potential problem area? if needed, explain on reverse. Yes No Plat ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 30 di"Pi CA _ ac s. 14. 4.CTAjjUfA abarr+119 7-a H FACO12. - s .�2aItrd'. a__Ir4a" P N t . S. cy6tuM M tr—`,t4& _ 14. 7. &AUI/45 cif l a0 1�I 041 i 15. bOr►MrtBnt Specie -------------------------- _.. .�................... of ai�/ �.......................... ...................... ............................ .................... Percent of dominant species that are 013L, FACW or FAC(excluding FAG I_ Remarks: p"'k, fvE a 7fi�� d}+� r k V bra; vl _5� e f-/ f HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): _ Stream, take, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs _ Other " 14o Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water. Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soll: Welland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): (in.) _ Oxidized Rod Channels in Upper 12 Inches _ Water -Stained Leaves (in.) Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test (in,) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No � td/e"�l r y1If�-� yam)' 0 SOILS Map Unit Name f i (Series and Phase): I �� - S E ?' 7azoriamy (SutirouQ): Praf�t Qe�,,crivtions: Depth Matra Color Horizon Munsell Moist �" ' I r Jam ' -- Motile Colors Mansell Moist ' � A , _ Drainage Class: IJPQ& I Field Observations Confirm Ma�sped Ty�e7 Yes No Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture Concretions Stn tture etc. 0�6 [) 3 C�ralrrl %aM Hyddc Soil lndicators. Histosai Concretions HWjc Eplpedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor organic Strealdng in Sandy Sails Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils list Reducing Conditions Listed on Nations! Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: /t)I �i�G�,� i C S P,-/ r xGF'r C4 7"1 v S, WETLAND DETERMINATION HydrVhyW Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) f (CErde) Welland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Sans Present? ' Yes o Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes No Remarks: / 7�1 ILe41t i5t Z,%V,0 lr9 rG is q rq 0"+ %wt�f .57 /r �r,q Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrgectlSite: _51A) T - '�.j� 1 YC a ce olf e Date: }� 0- ApplicanVOvmer- !« County:— �rnestl�ator(s,)... Do normal circurnstances exist on site? Yes No Community to: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes 1 Plot Transect ID: /� �7 Is the area a potential proWern area? (If needed, explain on reverse.) Yes f No ID; I r_S VEGETATION Dominant Plant species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator I. 0f1Ala C9- 2. 10. 3. 11. 4. 12- 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. Is. 8. t 6. ' t]omiO9nf ........... Percent of dominant species that are OBL FACW or FAC(excluding FAC- / Q O Remarks: F,,tr a rc6r HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Z_ Other t4' Recorded Data Available Fleld Observations; Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soll: Wetland Hydrology indicators Primary Indicators: _ Inundated *Saturated in sipper 12 Inches _ Water clams _ Drift Lines _ Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): (in.) Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches p ` Water -Stained Leaves G (in.) Local Sod Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test ScM C (in-) Other (F)plain in Remarks) Remarks: A f C ,� SO(LS Map Unit Name r^ fi f l J (Series and Phase): c _,�� (!�� ;. { �� - Drainage Crass: Field Obserratlons Profile �riations: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle finches] Horizon (Munsell Moist). (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast TITf 16 j� 3�1jaA ,'s S I fi r Hydric &A Indicators: Hlstosat Histic €plpedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Molsture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 1.lsted on local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Main in Rernarks) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Clrcie) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this sampling point within a wetland? ay" No Remarks' & v;eA i PiC �%� j ! , / A va 'vP Approved by HOUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ZZPro)ectJSite:4C Date:. AppticantfOwner: 61 , f � ¢� County. k1/ L%v nvestigators_ ny G State: --I Do normal circumstances exist on site? �Y) No Community ID. is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes Nu Transect ID: Is the area a ential KWem area? if needed, explain on reverse. Yes a Plot I0: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator //Species UGTCofd►r 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14- 7. 15- t3. 16, • L?orrananr s �iqs .i' d i ° ail._' �. � ................................................--.....— ---•---•----. .............................. i',r.:' _----- ....-...----........f.. .... Pereerd of dominant species that are OBL FACW or FAC(excluding FAC- . d Remarks: 011'"I HYDROI .[)CY T Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs —Other t4o Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit. (in.) Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Remarks: p ,/ , 7 �. e C Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift Unes Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more requi(ed); _ Oxidized Root Channels to Upper 12 Inches _ Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test —other (lain In Remarks) SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): )p 01,;v 110,140 i f H Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors finches) Horizon (Mansell M?i �s j( (Munse11 Moist) Drainage Class: Poo� ah(A10 Field Observations Mapped Confirm MappYes .. . ................. ...... :Tv-q e ............. . No ............... Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concreflons, Structure etc- ZeyA4 ...................... .............................. . .... . .......... ......................... Hydric SoR indicators: ...... . ...... HistoW Concreflons Hiis& Epipedon - High Organic Content In Surface Layer In Sandy Soils Suffidic Odor Organic Strealdrig In Sandy Soh Aquic Moisture Regime - Usted on Local Hydric Soils W Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils W Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Ex0ain in Remarks) Remaft: L===� WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Na(circle) (Circle) Welland Hydrology Presert7 Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes Nv Is this sampling point wtthin a wetland? Yes No Remarics: 7 L) We Y144(4�1 A ;s-le I I r 1--elt 1; ex Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETL-AND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Sde:...71n ) _t_�1 Applicant/Owner: JLL Dater County: Do normal circumstances exist on site? (Yeses No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situatian)7 Yes N Transecl ID. Is the area a ential problern areal if needed, explain on reverse. Yes Plot 1D: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ies Stratum Indicator 1. &/q"/S Q tf � 9. rrf�X f 2. 10. 3. I t - 4. 12. 5. 13. 6, 14. 7. 1 S. S. 16- _ ` !)orryrlarrt Species -----------._ Percent of dominant species that are 013E FACW or FAC(excluding FAC- R emarks: o r.� tr o f 'yo v! 1/-. HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other Into Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Depth to Saturated Salt: 2C (in.) Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated aturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks _ Drift Lines _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches Water -Stained Leaves Local Solt Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test Other (E)qplain in Remarks) I_ SOILS Map Unit Name f f 1 (Series and Phase): i/ 31 f?f r �d �lf I/e %" 1 act ►•r - Drainage Ctass: G'r a fJLA Field Observations Depth Matrix Color Mottle Cols mottle Horizon Hydric Sall Indicators: HWosol HWk Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime /Reducing Conditions yam" Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Remarks; WETLAND DETERMINATION etc. Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Solis List Usled on National Hydric Sails list Other (Explain In Remarks) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle) Weiland Hydrology present? No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes No Remarks- II, { ! fL(' G1/�J�/��S `�G �Z Gila 1..�.. iy��Le4� , Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: �khl I �T. /yC.R �CeA4 Date: -5- J �/�rrp/_ App icant/Ownef: County. C� %f "!rl ErwestiQa€or(s�_ t, i ..State: ...Sta ate:.. Do normat circumstances exist on site? Y No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area jj5otential Lwoblem areal If needed, explain on reverse. Yes Plot ID. VEGETATION Dominant Plant S ies Stratum Indicator '22fua Dominant Plant S les Stratum Indicator r U SCa �d r, 3. 11, 4, 12. 5. 13. 6. 14_ 7. 15. t3, 16. r Dor4nanf Spaacies _ 3/a�+ i>1 `'u l t/ a`^� �OP +' f; `.�..... �--� ° "f Percent of dominant species that are OBL FACW or FAC (excludingFAC- . / Remarks: yY Gf� I?`} �i rrria�ell ? f lQ e5 El" HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs J Inundated _ Dther Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks trio Recorded Data Available _ Drift Lines _ _ Sediment Deposks Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Fletd Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: (in.} _ Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches _ Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks eF SOILS f' Map Unit Name Lit (Series and Phase): �I ,1 Drainage Class: 4o f dkf?�ta Field Observations Tax°nnrt?Y..�SubBr°uP�: .Cor.firrn NaP rYPe?._._._�`�.. No ... Profile Des;riDiionts: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle inches Horizon Munsell Moist unsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture Concretions Structure etc. 1 Q/� a •�I Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Eplpedon High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulrid-ic Odor Organic Strealdng.In Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local HydricSoils last Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils i.ist Gleyed or Low-Chrorna Colors Other (F,,,IAWn In Remarks) Remarks; l / WETLAND DETERMINATION HydrophyW Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Solis Present? Yes Is this sampling point within a wettand? Yes Remarks: it S r C r �I14,E "9-/ Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 e DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION r r�� (19,.8�7^�COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Pro)ecVS$e: w /� Q C } • Date:VVI Applicant/Owner: t�I -llVl tb CountyInvestigators; ..Stale._.� Do normal circumstances exist on site? Y No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes o Transect ID: f Is the area a notentiat nrabfem area? (if needed. explain on reversc.l Yes No Aid 1M VEGETATION Dominant Plant SpecAes Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator 2. 10. 3. it_ 4. 12, S. 13. 6. 14, 7. Is. 8. 16. QanrnBof Specie-5 Percent of dominants ies that are OBL FACW or FAC excludi FAC- . p� ' Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs _ Inundated Other -.-Saturated in Lipper 12 Inches Water Marks No Recorded Data Available Drift Lines _ _ Y Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Fleld Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: (in_) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local SO Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated So?): (in) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name !1 (Series and Phase): Illd 1_ fOIIYiq - - --- - -- Drainage Class: �— Field Observations Tazarwmv (Subaroaa): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Nn Prom Descriotlons: Depth inches Mat16t Calor Horizon AMunsell Moist Monte Colors MunsJ Moist Woe AtwndancelContrast Texture Comm ions Structure etc. _.........------- ---------- ..._........_._...... Hydric Sail Indicators: .................... ........ ......... ....... ...... ....... ... ... .� _ r. . Htstosot Concretions Mistic Epipedon High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfedic Odor Organic Streaidng In Sandy Solls Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on !Local Hydit Soils List Reducing Conditions listed on National Hydric Sok List Gkyect or Low-Chroma Colors Other (E*ain in Remarks) Remarks: /R u-RW", r WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) {Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydric Solis Present? Yes No is this sampling point within a wetland-? Yes No Remarks: rr�• V�ir iYl � LttC. �i��G� S�d�� d � r.✓� �� i ia.q !s-t.ba�� G?�-{ ��.1 L Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 5I. 2 -� b."Iy'e, '— r ' 1 d C �r^J. � Date: Y ApplicanVOwner: { County Invest aator(s�. G State: U(1 Do normal circumstances exist on site? No Community Ii7: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Yes NOTransect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? (If needed. explain on reverse,) Yes / Ncy Plot ID: S P— F VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Specie-- Stratum Indicator r 10. 3, i t . 4 12. 5. 13. $. 14. .7. is. a.1 1 s- Dominant Species Percent of dominant species that are OSL FACW or FAC(excluding FAG-). / S Remarks:V . �. r! ? l' l r'� _ _ �. iV i",-p .v: (l .a i t ' / �7 • ,i�i �d / Jf� _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aadak Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in,) Depth to Saturated Soll: (in.) Remarks: No Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks _ Drift Lines Sediment Depostts Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) SOILS 4 Map Unit Name f,/ (Series and Phase): dO�fTti 6I!L rI/ �� Drainage Class: ,wp Field Observatw s ............... I ......... ...... Profile Descriptions: Depth Matra Color Mottle Colors Mottle Cinches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Wunsefl Moist) Abundance/Contrast Hydric Soil Indicators: Histocol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Suf5ft Odor OrganIc Streaking In Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed an Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Condbons Listed on National Hydric Soils list Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors CMw (Esplaln In Remarks) Remarks: r WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? ' Yes Nv is this sampling point within a wettand'i Yes No Rerr;artcs_ /� -fa a wale r Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Appendix B Ecdogy Wetland Rating Forms WETLAND RATING FORM - WESTERN WASHINGTON Name of wetland (if known); ` "' ' r' ' ` v Location: SEC342 TWNSHP: RNGE: � (attach map with outline of wetland to rating form) Person(s) Rating Wetland: —Affiliation: Date of site DRAFT SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland 29 I II HI-K IV Category I =Score >70 Score for Water Quality Functions Category II = Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions Category ill = Score 30-50 Score for Habitat Functions Cattemory TV T Score < 30 TOTAL score for functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I H Does not Apply Final Catecro'J (choose the "highest" category from above) b a a Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated. YR aMEN Estuarine Depress onal Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake -fringe Mature Forest Slo e Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal f nterdunal None of the above Wetland Rating Form— western Washington l August 2004 Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. SP 1. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species?i' For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the a roriate state database. SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, Ll the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part o the data sheet you will need to determine the H dro geomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Glass of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland hating Form -- western Washington 2 August 2004 Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington Wetland Name: Date: L Alethe. water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO go to 2 YES -- the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES — Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO — Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and H estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. Is a topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. NO go to 3 YES — The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (S ha) are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NQ� go to 4 YES — The wetland class is Lake -fringe (Laeustrine Fringe) 4. Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), _ .The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NQ� go to 5 YES — The wetland class is Slope 5. Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average, to answer "yes. " The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO - go to 6 YES 71 The wetland class is Riveriue Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 3 August 2004 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, fpresent, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO —go to 7 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the wetland located in, a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO —go to 8 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 101/o or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10% classify the wetland using the first class. Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slone + Lake -fringe Lake-frinee I Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary I Depressional _ Denressional + Lake -fringe Denressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to you' _W- etland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as,Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 4 August 2004 • R 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 52) • R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event: Depressions cover >3/4 area of wetland points = 8 Depressions cover > 1/2 area of wetland points = 4 Depressions present but cover < 1 /2 area of wetland points = 2 ; No depressions present Dints 10 R R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: Forest or shrub > 2/3 the area of the wetland points = 8 Forest or shrub > 1/3 area of the wetland points -= 6 Ungrazed, emergent plants > 2/3 area of wetland points =q Ungrazed emergent plants > 1/3 area of wetland points = 3 Forest, shrub, and Mgyrazqd emergent < 1/3 area of wetland_points = 0 R Add the points in the boxes above R R 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water Quality? (seep. 53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. -- Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -- Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland - - A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging IZResidential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -- The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels of sediment, toxic compounds or nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality multiplier — Other 2- E5 multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 3 R j TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R 1 by R 2 Add score to table on p. I Comments Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 7 August 2004 R R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: mm Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel (distance between hanks). Calculate the ratio: (width of wetland)f(width of stream). If the ratio is more than 20 y points = 9 If the ratio is between 10 -- 20 points = 6 If the ratio is 5- <10 points = 4 If the ratio is I- <5 points = 2,,, If the ratio is < 1 points = 1 R R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris as `forest or shrub ". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. r Forest or shrub for > 1/3 area OR Emergent plants > 2/3 area points Forest or shrub for > 1/10 area OR Emergent plants > 1/3 area points = 4 Vegetation does not meet above criteria points = 0 R Add the points in the boxes above R R 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 57) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. — There are human structures and activities downstream (roads, buildings, bridges, farms) that can be damaged by flooding. — There are natural resources downstream (e.g. salmon redds) that can be multiplier damaged by flooding ---- Other (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike) Y'ES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 R TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4 Add score to table on p. Comments Wetland Rating Form -- westem Washington $ August 2004 Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 13 August 2004 H 1.4. In of habitats (seep. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between types of vegetation (described in H 1.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. i "AF None. oints Low = I point Moderate 2 points 19" '1 0 High = 3 points w Y 4:. d >-+ [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types and open water the ratina is always "high". H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or ovedmaging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream for at least 33 ft (10m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present At least'/4 acre of thin -stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 2 5 % of the wetland area in each stratum of plants H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat /� I Add the scores in the column above Comments Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 14 August 2004 H 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? MEN H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text far definition of "undisturbed. " -- 100 m (33Oft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no -grazing) Points = 5 — 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 --- 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference,. Points = 3 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points =1 --- Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points =1 H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES =4points (go toH2.3) peo gotoH2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undistund unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake -fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H2.3) O H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 is the wetland: within 5 mi (Skm) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi ofe greater than 20 acres? ft S 1 point NO = 0 points Wetland hating Form — western Washington. 15 August 2004 H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other 13rionty habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland? (s text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats) Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres). Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 fL Old -growth forests: (Old -growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (S treeslacre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 - 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. EstuarylEs#uary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi -enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low -energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean -derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat =1 point No habitats = 0points Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 16 August 2004 H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within %2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, Melds, or other development. points = 5 The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake - fringe wetlands within f/2 mile points = 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within V2 mile, BUT the connections between are disturbed points ty The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake - fringe wetland within V2 mile points = 3 There is at least 1 wetland within V2 mile. points = 2 There are no wetlands within V2 male. points = 0 H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat I Add the scores in the column above Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on ; Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 17 August 2004 K I EX SDMH RIM 18.16 ! IE 8.74 44 I_ 3� y f J" IE 14.68 SEE N4jE 3 / V I ft r' EX SSMH RIM 1914 IE N 14.64 (EX) IE S 14.62 (EX) IL W 14.59 (EX) EXIST 60" CONC STORM 300 LF 8• IS S=0.409 r ~ NEW SSMH IE 13.35 J NOTES: 1. HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83/91 VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 2. BASED ON AS -BUILT MWINGS PRRIOLVIIDDED KVEBY�THEE CITY OF RENTON. 1TIVEUS WILL BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO 30% DESIGN, PE AS 3. REMOVE REOUIKD To WALL NG SANITARY SEWER R WALL NEW C M3 TCROSSING. PLUG END OF REMAINING PIPE WITH CONCRETE. 4. NEW SEWER PIPE TO PASS THROUGH NEW STORM DRAIN MANHOLE WITHIN DUCTILE IRON PIPE. EX SDIAH w RIM 19.04 IE 2.44 CONNECT TO EX 8' Is LLJ EX SDMH IF 9,26 o NEW SSNH 32 LF B" SS IE 12.15 5=0.44R Q a O _ NEW SSMH 3oO LF 8' SS S=0.401 165 LF 8' SS S=0.40% if 11.37 A CURs AND GUTTER S.W. 34TH STREET NEW SS SEE 4 sT� R.O.W. ABANDON EX SS EX SDMH RIM 20.40 IE 9.51 — PLA� N SCALE: 1'-41Y �CITY OF REN TON Planning/6uilding/Puhfc Work' Dept. EX SSMH IE 10.86 EX SSMH E 10.15 NEW SWH CONNECT TO EXISTING IE 10.75 40 0 40 80 Feet eet SW 34TH STREET-15-ob CULVERT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT .� FIGURE 6 SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION NO. REVISION HY 1 OATS 1 APPR 4' ' � f IB fERAND �QUNOARY f f 50' WETLAND BUFFER NW WINGWALL i LIMIT OF ROAD RECONSTRUCTION I I SW WINGWALI I I N Y 5a' WETLAND f BUFFER I � WETLAND BOUNDARY' = rrrl■I■�p SPRINGBROOK CREEK TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION LIMIT OF ROAD RECONSTRUCTION W r c� W a } I r I• W cc 0 7. e � Le WETLAND BUFFER 1' g� i E SU O PLAN SCALE: 1'e20' 3 0 50' WETLAND .� _ BUFFER V DIA TEMPORARY // �.=WE�ftAND48' DIVERSION PIPES NOTES. 1. THIS FIGURE SHOWS A SCHEMATIC PLAN TO TEMPORARILY DNERT FLOWS IN SPRINCBROOK CREEK. FINAL PLAN WILL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR. :... E7y, :'<l �q F, ° " �, , �� . m �•_10• �� CITY OF SW 34TH STREET a-ts-as CULVERT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RENTQN oATuu FIGURE Planning/Building/Public Waa"2 Dept. TEMPORARY DIVERSION PLAN NO. REYGON BY DATE APPR - '0"'""''0"""' Planting NDI:cs; g r— 50' WETLAND i. Seed m:x to he hydroseeded over all wetland and BUFFER '' wetland buffer areas to be disturbed by mit�gotion 1� V ern n a re o r creek ss } . activities :Deluding planting and installation of rootwnds � i and plac, e t and mov I of temporary c e k hypo pipes WETLAND I f 2 Rootwads shall be anchored prior to planting. f ' BOUNDARY —� 3 Willow species to be planted as 6C" dormant i cuttings. 4 Dogwood species to be planted from 1 -gallon size � - containers. 5. Black Cottonwooa snoll be minimum 6' in height, I i ea e .mutI— ra the , with slngle daminant I SPRINGOCREEK TRAIL r RECONSTRUCTION - NE WINGWA.LL LEGEND i� ► xroNUTAfNr rR CA5E ,I I: EXIST 60 STORM DRAIN, �IN�a 1r FLUSH wRLBR AND cA�iPERr -._._ ....,- __ .... _.. r R . ..... - SArn rAR SEA MAA*01E C..IArr Oi, NEW CATCH BASINS L�ru^ .oce wrry cwnr POA' CATCH E1sIIJS �,i JJ ,L ROAD Low Lc,,; POLL SEED mix SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME2 COVER QUANTITY FESTUCA RUBRA VAR. RUERA REO FESCUE 30x 15 L85 ACRE CARER STIPATA SAWBEAK SEDGE 40% 12 LBS ACRE CARER OFWFYANA DEWCY S�_OGE Sox 12 LOs ACRE 1 e N S �a+r wend AT FULL iGcE IF NOr ONE rkCh 5CACC ACCGROWIY ,WETLAND - BOUNDARY )1) kl Jones &r Stokes WETLAND —SD 'N!NGWALL uNDERCROunD cAs BOUNDARY -- - ur,DFeceouNDttcnzK WETLAND uM7fRGRO ND sAnuTARr . KING COUNTY8 UFEEP __ - 00ERGRO0,D STORY DRAINAGE DISTRICT POW uNDERCROuun relrRrwAE — SPRINGBROOK CREEK TRAIL UNDIRGROLUfi WATER NoTFS IS a 15 30 THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS THE Tc7P4!,RAYNIC FEA1l1RE5 AS 1HEY EXISTED ON SITE AS OF APR14 2;. 2005. `raie Feet - - ` - - NE./4,SE 1/4. S M, TWP 23 N, R 4 E.&N4 1/4, SW 1/4, S 30, TWP 23 N, R5E, WX so, - "" CI TY 0I` SW 34TH STREET iz-ta-as REN TON CULVERT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 1 — _ �� Phoning/B�IId��9/Rubllc words Devt. PLANTING PLAN NG. REVISION dY DATE APPR INTERFUND TRANSFErc or �, P. fq �' 0�''Ivo ?, ?048 Transfer Number: Date: Department To Be Charged (Transfer Out - From V-� V w C� ( Description Account Number WO/Function Amount `%0 , 005 65" 7 r sz] C ZQ\3 Department Authorization: Department To Be Credited (Transfer In - To) TG� Description I Account Number WO/Function I Amount 6 1 r'i Distribution: White: Finance Department Yellow: Department to be Charged Pink: Department to be Credited Printed: 03-23-2006 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-032 Payment Made: 03/23/2006 02:55 PM Total Payment: 1,000.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: 0JZVJ�t0 »Y � ttA 4AR 2 3 2006 6C 1V& IL;u Receipt Number: R0601473 Payee: INTERFUND TRANSFER Trans Account Code Description Amount ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 5010 000.345.81,00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment IdT ALLEN QU 1,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ 3021 ------------------- 303.000.00.345.85 ------------------------------ Park Mitigation Fee ------------_---- .00 5006 000.345,81,00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00,0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00,0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Tine Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.D0.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst bev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees DO 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604,237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00