The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1PARTIES OF RECORD PUGET COLONY CPA/PREZONE LUA06-120, R, ECF William Iverson 13819 139th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 tel: (425) 271-0195 (party of record) Updated: 10/12/06 (Page 1 of 1) Impression antibourrage et a s6chage rapide Utilisez le gabarit 51600 F. Jay Cook 14012 SE 133'd S#. Renton, WA 98059 Armando Zorbin 2400 NE 10" PI. Renton, WA 98056 Danny Weng 13508 138' Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Robert Cave 1813 NE 24" St. Renton, WA 98056 Stan Loreen 13605 139th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 ?'r+ C�lo(ly M-S www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVER flwvv-�' AVERY® 51600 2-a Inez Petersen 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. #3 Renton, WA 98056 Richard Redfern 2000 NE 20th 5t. Renton, WA 98056 D. Downing 13807 139 Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 109 � �b Aa3Atl-O9-008-L .(D09LS 31W1dW31 �GaAV asn ® 09LS wo)•AGaAe-mNv n BullulJd aw4 a6pnwS pue wet CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5231 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (PUGET COLONY HOMES) FROM RESIDENTIAL S DU/AC (R S) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC (R-4) ZONING, FILE NO. LUA-06-120 (CPA 2006-M-5). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac (R-8); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing was held thereon on or about September 20, 2006, and the matter has been considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning request is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council has considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties have been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS; SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 4 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Administrator is hereby authorized and 1 ORDINANCE NO. directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to - wit: See Attachments "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Puget Colony Homes) SECTION IL This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 27th day of November , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2 7 t h day of November , 2006. ;eas to f �� Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 12/1/2006 (summary) ORD.1300:11 / 16/06: ma 2 Kathy Keo er, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 5231 ATTACHMENT A PUGET COLONY HOMES, CPA 2006-M-05 REZONE FROM R-S TO R-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads. November 27, 2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 417 area. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3844 A resolution was read approving the Windstone II Final Plat; approximately 3.6 Plat: Windstone II, Mt Baker acres Iocated in the vicinity of NE 17th St. and Mt. Baker Ave. NE. MOVED Ave NE, FP-04-124 BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: Comprehensive Plan: 2006 An ordinance was read adopting the 2006 amendments to the City's 2004 Amendments Comprehensive Plan, maps and data in conjunction therewith. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5228 Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was Comprehensive Plan: 2006 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Amendments ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Rezone: Carr Rd Properties, R- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Carr Rd. 8 & R-10 to R-14 properties from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) and R-10 (Residential - ten dwelling units per acre) to R-14 (Residential - fourteen dwelling units per acre) zoning; LUA-05-163, CPA 2006-M-3. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5229 Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was Rezone: Carr Rd Properties, R- MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT 8 & R-10 to R-14 THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Rezone: Springbrook An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Springbrook Associates, S 37th St, R-10 to Associates property from R-10 (Residential - ten dwelling units per acre) to CO CO (Commercial Office) zoning; LUA-05-158, CPA-2006-M-4. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5230 Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was Rezone: Springbrook MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT Associates, S 37th St, R-10 to THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. CO Rezone: Puget Colony Homes, NE 2nd St, R-8 to R-4 CIAO—ub-12,I) Ordinance #5231 Rezone: Puget Colony Homes, NE 2nd St, R-8 to R-4 Comprehensive Plan: 2006 Amendments, CA Zone for Aqua Barn Property, Maple Valley Hwy An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Puget Colony Homes property from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) to R-4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) zoning; LUA-06-120, CPA 2006-M- 5. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of the former Aqua Barn property within the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area as CA (Commercial Arterial) zoning; CPA 2006-M-7. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL County Journal REVIEW COMMITTEE Or RNNAh lG The Environmental Review Com- a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general mittee has issued a Determination of Non -Significance for the following circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date project under the authority of the of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language Renton Municipal Code. continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King Puget � pfrup R ECFRezone County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Location: South of ItiE end Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. -Street, North of SE 141st Street, The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the East of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE. %Fed King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly n„ property ownor interre9t, the distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed Cite is proposing to rezone this subject rirezL from R-S to R-4 notice, a zoning. Thia will ruquir(! a Cuwprohen vo Plan Amend- ment to change the subject Public Notice property from RS land use designation to RLD land use designation_ was published on October 30, 2006. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 13, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum 2tx16. Appeals must be filed in writing of $107.50. together with the required $75.00 application fee with: hearing Eram- La.c'.'_ finer, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, ' Appeals to the Examiner are, governed by City of Renton Municipal Code J d' rton Section 4 9 114.B. Additional infar Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal - , mation regarding the appeal process _ ` e' may be obtained from the Renton City Subscribed and sworn to me this 30"' day of October, 2004. Clerk's Office, 425) 430-6510_ Published in the King County Journal a October 30, 2006. 4861990 B D Cantelon Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent, Washington PO Number: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duty sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period, The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on December 1, 2006. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of S423.23. ffgal Advertising verotinsing Representative, King County Journal - Subscribed and sworn to me this I' day of December, 2006. B D Cantelon Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent, Washington PO Number, CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ORDINANCES ADOPTED l3Y RENTON CITY COUNCIL Following is summary of ordinances adopted by the Renton City Council on November 27, 20W: ORDINANCE NO.5228 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, adopting the 2006 amendments to the Cityrs 2004 Comprehensive Plan, Maps and Data in cortiuncdon therewith. Effective: 1Z 20N ORDINANCE NO. fi289 An ordinance of the City of Renton. Washington, changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton (Carr Road Pruperties) front Residential 8 DU/AU IR-8} and Re:idemral 10 DU/AC iR- M) zoning to Residential 1.1 DMAC (R-14). File Nu. LUAd15—M3 4CPA 2006-M-31. The legal descriptiun is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request. Eductive: 12MI209M ORDINANCE NO.6230 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Wasbington, changing the zoning classification of certain property within the City of Renton (Springbrook Associates Property) from Residential 10 DU/AC (R-10) zoning to Commercial Office zoning (CO). File No. LUA-05-158 (CPA 2006- M-4). The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon Tequest. Effective: 1202006 ORDINANCE NO.52al An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, changing the zoning classificaLlan of certain properties within the City of Benton (Puget Colony Homes) from Residential 8 DUTAC (R-8) zoning to Residential 4 DISIAC (11-4) zoning_ File No. LUA- 06-120 (CPA 2006-M-5). The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request. Effective: 12MOD6 ORDINANCE NO.5272 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, establishing the zoning claseification of certain property within the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area (Former Aqua Barn Property) as Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. (CPA 2006-M-7). The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request. Effective: 12IM006 ORDINANCE NO.5233 An ordinance of the City of Renton. Wnshiugwn, establishing the zoning rla5kticatiun ut certain property with the City of Renton'. Putential Aunexaliun Area 1Fnrmer Aquz Baru Property) as Residential 14 Dwelling Units per Acre (H-141 zoning. (Cl'A 2.006-M-71. The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request Effective: 121 /2006 ORDINANCE NO.5234 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, changing the caring classification of certain property within the City of Renton (Upper Kennydale Areal from Residential 8 DUTAC (R-8) zoning to Residential 4 DUTAC (R-41 zoning. File No. LUA4)6- 122 (CPA 2006-M-8). The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon rereqquest. Effective:127N2006 ORDINANCE NO-5235 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, amending Chapter 2, Storm and Surface Water drainage; Chapter 4, Water; and Chapter 5, Sewerd: of Title VID (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled `Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" by increasing rates. Effective: 12l31I2006 ORDINANCE NO.5236 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, annexing as of May 1, 2007 approximately 14.63 acres, generally located west, south, and east of the existing City, of Renton Boundaries defined by a peninsula of land immediately east of 108th Ave. SE, and south of SE 168th St. fHudson Annexation; File No. A-05- 005) The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available Upon request. Eflccthw 12I31l2006 ORDINANCE NO ,ail An ordinance of the City of Renton. Washington, establishing the zoning ehasaifs-Aicu of approximately 583 acres, located in two sections; the smallest, some 2.02 acres, on the south side of BE 168th St m the easternmost part of the annexation, and the largest, some 3.81 acres, on the west aide of 108th Ave. SE in the northernmost portion of the annexation site, as R-8 (Residential 8 DUTAC; Eight Dwelling Units per net Acre), (Hudson Annexation; File No. A-05-005) The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request. Effective: 12131IM06 ORDINANCE NO.5235 An ordinance of the CSty of Renton, Washington, establishing the zoning classification of approximately 6.60 acres, located in two sections; the smallest, some 1.9 acres, on the western side of 108th Ave. SE, and the largest, some 4.7 acres, on the east aide of 108th Ave. BE, both south of SE 168th St., if extended, as F-10 (Residential 10 DUTAC; Ten Dwelling Units per net Acmo , (Hudson Annexation; File No. A45-005) The legal description is on file at the City Clerk's office, and is available upon request. Effective: 12J31P2006 ORDINANCE NO.5239 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, amendin$ the 2006 Budget to authorize S36,000 foam increased revenues to offset increas overtime and labor costs due weather related crowd control and th extended socMye season. Effective: 12/6"L006 ORDINANCE NO.5240 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington, amending Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of 'title 1V {Development Regulations) of Ordinanc(+ Nn. 4260 entitled "Code, of General Ordinances of the City of Renton. Washington" by increasing public wurks construction permit fees Effective: 121311206 ORDINANCE NO.5241 An urdinanco of the City of Renton. Washington, amending Chapters 2, 4 and 11, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" by permitting wireless communication facilities within public right-of-way in residential auras and to incorporate three pre-existing administrative deterurinatious that clarify the wireless regulations. Effective: 12I3112006 Complete text of these arrimances is available at Renton City Hall, 105, South Grady Way; and posted at t Renton Public Libraries, 100 Mi Avenue South and 2902 NE 12th Street. Upon request to the City Clerk's office, (425) 430.6510, copies will also he mailed Far a fee Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published in the King County Journal December 1, 2006. k 862311 CITY OF RENTON PLANING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: November 22, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Holly Graber *1� Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City f Iar4'c (Iffira Project Name: Puget Colony CPA & Prezone LUA (fife) Number: LUA-06-120, ECF, R Cross -References AKA's: Project Manager: Erika Conkling Acceptance Date: September 29, 2006 Applicant: City of Renton - Rebecca Lind Owner: City of Renton Contact: City of Renton - Rebecca Lind PID Number: ERC Decision Date: October 23, 2006 ERC Appeal Date: November 13, 2006 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to' HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: A Qeefe,& Date: jUav z-4 Zoo(,, Mylar Recording dumber: Project Description: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land use designation to RLa land use designation. Location: Puget Colony Comments: �.. Kathy Keolker, Mayor +-,,R December 4, 2006 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Rezone LUA-06-120, R, ECE CIT116OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended on November 13, 2006 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non -Significance for the above - referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The decision of the ERC is final. This proposal was reviewed by the City Council at a public hearing on November 13, 2006. The Council took action on this proposal on November 27, 2006 and placed the subject property in Residential Low Density land use designation with Residential — 4 units per net acre (R-4) zoning (within the City limits). If you have any questions, please contact Don Erickson at (425) 430-6581. Sincerely, Erika Conkling Senior Planner cc: William Iverson / Party of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 0 This pgertantains 50% recycled nakwW, 30%post oDrmumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Puget Colony Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-120, R. ECF LOCATION: South of NE 2nd Street, North of SE 141st Street, Eeet of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE DESCRIPTION: Based or property owner Interest, the City Is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to RA zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject properly from RS land use designatim to RLO land use designation. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appaeis of the env iranmerdaI determination must be tiled In writing an or before Sato PM on November 13, 2006. Appeals must be filed In Wriling together with the reguirsd $76.00 appliwtlon fee wAh: Hearing Exambmr, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govsmed by City 01 Rentem Munlalpal Code SeMlon 4-6-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 1426) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BESET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425)430.7200, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION projec7NUMBN r CERTIFICATION , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by mein y' conspicuous places ornearbyAie described proper^NN I+r{ DATE: O ._ SIGNED: 41 p -% ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington resitpng ip _` S r an the _3 LS[ day of NOTARY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Puget Colony Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-120, R, ECF LOCATION: South of NE 2nd Street, North of SE 141st Street, East of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE DESCRIPTION: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land use designation to RLD land use designation. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 13, 2006. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $76.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. Puget Colony Homes CPA 200E-M-05 Proposed Land Use Map 0 i cd�nnlr lknuyrpmtnL iJely�Miilnkxl.x tiirnicFic l>I:in�i'in� 5WdV n .1kv W.d, AtliNM,auuur _ R.Mn Cky Umlle 200 400 � RMidehONd Lnv MneilY i-:':...1 Raaitlenilel5inph Filihrp FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ��Y 2)o CIT�DF RENTON 4, ♦ PlanningBuildingftblicWorks Department "� Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator ,� `� � Kathy Keolker, Mayor October 26, 2006 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Rezone LUA-06-120, R. ECF This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above -referenced project. The Committee, on October 23, 2006, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non - Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6. Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 13, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98056. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cleric's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, e � /9 Erika Conkling Associate Planner cc: William Iverson ! Party of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 500/ recycled material, 30%postconsurrter RENTC7N AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITI DF RENTON Kathy Keolker, Mayor October 26, 2006 1 Washington State , Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 985047703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Planning/Building/PublieWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Transmitted herewith are copies of the Environmental Determinations for the following projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on October 23, 2006: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT.NAME: Chee CPA and Rezone (CPA 2006-M-01) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-151, R, ECF PROJECT NAME: Sprinbrook Office (CPA 2006-M-04) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-158, R, ECF PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Blueberry Farm (CPA 2006-M-02) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05.159, R, ECF PROJECT NAME: Rivera and City Initiated Zoning Map Amendment (CPA 2006-M-03) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-163, R, ECF PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT.NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: Puget Colony Rezone (CPA 2006-M-05) LUA06-120, R, ECF Highlands R-10 Zoning Text Amendments LUA06-121, ECF Upper Kennydale Rezone (CPA 2006-M-08) LUA06-122, R, ECF Transportation CIP CPA (CPA 2006-T-4) LUA06-123, ECF Land Use and Community Design Element CPA (CPA 2006-T-3) LUA06-124, ECF Mobile Home Park Text Amendments (CPA 2006-T-5) LUA06.125, ECF Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 13, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1 tO.B.' Additional information regarding the appeal process may be. obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 _.._._— j� E �T �" O l�T AHEAD OF THE CURVE 1j M Thispapercordains50%recyGedmaNxial,30%post oxteunw CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA06-120, R, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Puget Colony Rezone (CPA 2006-M-05) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land designation to RLD land use designation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South of NE 2"d Street, North of SE 1415` Street, East of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 13, 2006. Appeals must be fled in writing together with the required $75,00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Planni ing/Public Works guc�_ awml Terry Higashiyama, Administrat Community Services October 30, 2006 October 23, 2006 147 Date IP62avid Daniel ire Chief Fire Department Date 3-64 v3 Date le Pietsch, Administrator Da EDNSP STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DATE October 23, 2006 Project Name Puget Colony Rezone (CPA 2006-M-05) Applicant City of Renton File Number LUA06-120, R, ECF Project Manager Don Erickson Project Description Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land use designation to RLD land use designation. Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. South of NE 2nd Street, North of SE 141st Street, East of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf NIA 14.6 acres Total Building Area gsf NIA Project Location Map ERCRepomdoc T. City of Renton EDNSP Department ronmental Review Committee Staff Report Puget Colony Rezone LUA-06-120, R, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 23, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Puget Colony Homes CPA 2006 M-05�� 400 Proposed Land Use Map Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Straiegic Planning Study rA ea G. � + Alcx Rosrih, Admiuixlrrlur — . Del Ro�o —Renton City � Residential Low Density ry co t June 2006 Limits = Residential Single Family ERC Report.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department ironmental Review Committee Staff Report Puget Colony Rezone LUA-06-120, R, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 23, 2006 Page 3 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE X I Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None required for this non -project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non project environmental review addresses only those Impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures andlor Notes to Applicant: X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, November 13, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC Report.doc AMENDMENT M-5 — PUGET COLONY DESCRIPTION: Residents of the recently annexed 18.8-acre Puget Colony Homes subdivision request a change in land use designation from Residential Single Family to Residential Low Density. They are requesting this change because they do not want to see lots greater than 10,000 square feet in area in their neighborhood subdivided into smaller, 5,000 square foot lots. The latter, they believe, would be out of character with the larger 9,000-plus square foot lots that typify this neighborhood. The subject subdivision was annexed into the City in January 2006 as part of the 65-acre Mosier II Annexation. Puget Colony Homes Subdivision consists of three cul-de-sac streets, SE 133rd Street, SE 13e Street, and SE 135`h Street. It also has homes fronting on SE 132nd Street on the north and homes fronting on SE 136 h Street on the south. There are 61 lots in the Puget Colony Homes Subdivision of which 23 are greater than 10,000 square feet in area, and presumably, could be subdivided if existing building layouts were not a constraint. Four lots are greater than 15,000 square feet and presumably could be subdivided into three lots if existing building layouts were not a constraint. ISSUE SUMMARY: 1. Whether the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map should be amended so that the 18.8-acre Puget Colony Homes Subdivision would be designated Residential Low Density? 2. If the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is amended, changing the current land use designation for this area from Residential Single Family to Residential Low Density, should the subject site be rezoned R-4 consistent with this new land use designation? RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: A change in land use designation from RS to RLD with concurrent R-4 zoning would be more in character with this existing subdivision. The current average density for the Puget Colony Homes Subdivision is only about 3.25 dwellings per acre and the plat is 75% built out. The Administration is therefore recommending that the 18.8-acre Puget Colony Homes Subdivision be redesignated Residential Low Density and concurrently be rezoned R-4, four units per net acre. Staff are also recommending that the Planning Commission consider expanding this CPA to include the nine lot Kimberly Lane subdivision to the immediate west on the north side of SE 136th Street, 13508 1380' Avenue SE, a 1.1 acre parcel, west of Kimberly Lane subdivision, and the 31-lot Hideaway Home Sites subdivision on the south side of SE 136 h Street since all of these lots are greater than the R-4 zones 8,000 square feet minimum. If the Commission concurs, a detailed capacity and land use analysis, similar to what follows for the Puget Colony Homes subdivision, will be prepared. HAEDNSM-omp P1an\Amendments1200612006 Map Amendments12006-M-05 Puget Colony\CPA M-5 Puget Colony.doc ANALYSIS: Based upon Figure 1, it appears that out of the 61 lots in the Puget Colony Homes subdivision, 46 lots are currently developed with single-family detached structures. 15 lots are vacant and presumably could support future development. CAPACITY ANALYSIS: This analysis considers land area only and does not consider the feasibility of removing or redeveloping structures. There currently are 61 lots in the Puget Colony Homes subdivision. Of these, 26 lots are 10,000 square feet or larger in size, but less than 15,000 square feet in area, and potentially could be subdivided into two or more 5,000 square foot lots with R-8 zoning based on parcel size without consideration of the location of existing houses. Four of these lots are 15,000 square feet or greater in area, but less than 20,000 square feet, and could accommodate three 5,000 square foot. Thus, with R-8 zoning, 24 new lots could theoretically be developed. With R-8 zoning and 5,000 square foot minimum lot sizes, 83 lots could be created if sewer service is provided. With R-4 zoning and 8,000 square foot minimum lot sizes, four lots would become legal non -conforming because these lots are less than 8,000 square feet in area. Two lots are larger than 16,000 square feet in area, and theoretically could be subdivided into two lots each, for a net increase of two lots, bringing the total number of lots under R-4 zoning to 63 lots. Existing Lots Non- conformin g Lots Potential New Lots TOTAL LOTS Future Net Density R-4 Zone with 8 000 W. 2 63 4.31 du/net sq. 61 4 minimum acre lots R-8 Zone with 5 000 24 85 5.82 du/net sq. tit. 61 0 minimum acre lots COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title IV 4-9-020, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are required to meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan, or 2. The request supports the adopted business pan goals established by the City Council, or 3. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies, or HAEDNSP\Comp PlaMAmendments120W2006 Map Amendments12006-M-05 Puget Colony\CPA M-5 Puget Colony.doc 4. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of the City Council. Amending the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for this area from Residential Single Family to Residential Low Density appears to be consistent with the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan in that it helps ensure that the City has "well established neighborhoods and a growing diversity of housing to match the diversity of the population with its various needs and wants."' Such a Comp Plan Amendment is also generally consistent with Policy LU-134 which states that: "Density should be a maximum of 4- du/net acre (Residential 4) on portions of the Residential Low Density land where [environmental] constraints are not extensive and urban densities are appropriate. In fact, because the area is an existing established neighborhood with an average density of 3.36- du/net acre, at full development (63 lots) under Residential 4 zoning, densities would be approximately 4.3-du/net acre. Designating the 18.8 acres Residential Low Density also appears consistent with Objective LU-EE which states: "Designate Residential 4 du/acre zoning in those portions of the RLD designation appropriate for urban levels of development by providing suitable environments for suburban and/or estate style, single-family residential dwellings." As an existing, already developed, neighborhood that provides suburban style single-family dwellings, R-4 zoning would seem more appropriate for the area than R-8 zoning. Even at full build out a density of only 4.3 would be achieved. With R-8 zoning an anticipated density of 5.68 du/net acre could be achieved, assuming 22 new lots. ZONING CONCURRENCY: Pursuant to Title IV 4-9-190, the following criteria must be met for a change in zoning classification: 1) The proposed amendment meets the review criteria in RMC 4-9-020G; and 2) The property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; and 3) At least one of the following circumstances applies: i) The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or ii) Since the most recent land use analysis or the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development, or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. From the Vision for the City: "Renton: A world -class city where people choose to live, work, and play." H:\EDNSP\Comp PIanlAmendments1200612006 Map Amendmcnts12006-M-05 Puget ColonylCPA M-5 Puget Colony.doc This proposed CPA, as seen above, does meet the criteria in RMC 4-9-020G. Also, it is potentially classified for R-4 zoning in that it is contiguous to an existing RLD land use designation to its east and south and the area to the east across Hoquiam Avenue NE, recently brought into the City, is currently zoned R-4. This specific reclassification was not considered at the time of the last land use analysis and area zoning and, in fact, there are material changes that do affect the subject 18.8-acre site. These include the annexation of the site as well as the surrounding area to the north, east and west into the City as well as the construction of new subdivisions to the west and east of the site. Concurrent R-4 zoning would be consistent with a redesignation of the 18.8-acre site from RS to RLD and better reflects the existing density of 4.18 du/net acre. CONCLUSION: The proposed redesignation of the 18.8-acre Puget Colony Homes subdivision site from Residential Single Family (RS), as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, to Residential Low Density (RLD) appears consistent with the provisions of Title IV, 4-9-020G. Similarly, the proposed concurrent reclassification of this site from the City's R-8 zone to its R-4 zone appears consistent with the provisions of Title IV, 4-9-120, since this site was not considered for this zoning classification during the last area land use analysis and area zoning. Consideration should also be given to amending the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for two existing subdivisions to the southeast of Puget Colony Homes subdivision. HAEDNSPIComp Plan\knendments1200612006 Map Amendments12006-M-05 Puget ColonylCPA M-5 Puget Colony.doc City enton Department of Planning / Building / P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2 APPLICANT: City of Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGE r' Conklin PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren ittrick SITE AREA: 14.6 acres a BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: S of NE 2n° St, N of SE 1418' St, E of Duvall Ave NE, W of Hoquiam Ave NE _ WORK ORDER NO: 77654 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land use designation to RLD land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animats Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics L' ht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistorklCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14, 000 Feet -T-4. 0 a� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informa#pn is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized it)'«-6to Date City or ,enton Department of Planning /Building /Pubai, Norks ENVIRONMENTAL $ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: • ? COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2006 E D E I V E D APPLICANT: City of Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick OCT SITE AREA: 14.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A BdTOINU iVlSlpN LOCATION: S. of NE 2"d St, N of SE 1416' St, E of Duvall Ave WORK ORDER NO: 77654 NE, W of Hoquiam Ave NE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from IRS land use designation to RLD land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land%Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Naalth Energy! Natural Resources 111ZY",ie' S. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS Nc volt C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Q cw-F_: ,Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services NisionclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ii JJ V! Signa r f Director or Auth rized Representative Date City at menton Department of Planning / Building / Pub,l4 Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I rc, COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Cityof Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erik +Cariklin ' PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick SITE AREA: 14.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/ I OCT I LOCATION: S of NE 2nd St, N of SE 141 e1 St, E of Duvall Ave NE, W of Ho uiam Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77654 I L_` SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezoi his sul�'ect,, ri from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from Re S lan�use ct+gnetion-to-Rt-B-1 land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources W B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htAGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistorWCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with fla#icular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi nal information is ne to properly assess this proposal. s' V Signature of Oireqor or Authorized Repre entat Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Pub&„ Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklin PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick SITE AREA: 14.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: S of NE 2"d St, N of SE 141$' St, E of Duvall Ave NE, W of Hoqulam Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77654 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from IRS land use designation to RLD land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Mino► Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services HistoncICultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet '�" , r"np" "!s /�' e'e'-9 B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areps whore additional inthmj4tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. of Director or AutFiorized Representative City o_ _ _en ton Department of Planning / Building / Pub— . !orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 76, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2006 APPLICANT: City of Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklin i E C E I V E PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick OCT 20nR SITE AREA: 14.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: S of NE 2n, St, N of SE 141s' St, E of Duvall Ave NE, W of Hoquiam Ave NE DIVISION WORK ORDER NO: 77654 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from RS land use designation to RLD land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor . Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS l 7 & "C-- C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS f4D IVC' Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Tramortation Public Services HistorWCultural Preservation Airport Environment IQ, 000 Feet 14, O1J0 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas who additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i3 --- Si ature o Director ut orized epresentative Date C1ty o_ _ _ _nton Department of Planning / Building / Pub__ _ ..corks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��f` COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-120, R, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 2, 2006 C IE 3 V p APPLICANT: City of Renton - EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklin PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony CPA & Rezone PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick SITE AREA: 14.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA BUILDING DIVISION LOCATION: S of NE 2nd St, N of SE 141' St, E of Duvall Ave NE, W of Hoquiam Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77654 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from IRS land use designation to RLD land use designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Lar?&Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS oyw C_ CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Om Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major impacts More information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoridlCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact of areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. c� a bv� Sig i t of Director or Authorized Representative Date e NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 2, 2006 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA06-120, R, ECF APPLICATION NAME: Puget Colony Rezone I CPA 2006-M-05 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from i to RA zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property hum R$ lard use designation to RLD lend use designation. PROJECT LOCATION: South of NE 2n0 Street, North of SE 141"Street, East of Duvall Avenue NE. West of Hai Avenue NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCe jDNSj: As the Lead Agency. the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from it* proposed wring, Therefore, as permitted Ender the RGW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optianal DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely la he issued, Commem periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DkSj. A 14-day appeal period will Mi the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: Sepl Trill 21, 200E Per alWReview Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendrrenl. and Rezone Other P/rrrtfta which may be required- NIA Requested Studies: MA Location where spplitiol n may be reviewed: PlanninglBuildingtPublic Works Division, Development Services Department, 1056 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96065 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on this issue was held before the Planning Commission on September 20, 2006. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject she is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation, but is proposed to be changed to the Residential Low Density (RLD) land use desgnatil The proposed change is consistent with this land use designation, as weli as re:evant land use policies adopted in November 2004_ EnvtronmeMal Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist prepared December 15, 2006 Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: This non -project action wili be subject to the City's SEPA Crdinance snd Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse envirormenlai Impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions, However, mitgation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal con the subject site. Comment$ on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson Senior Planner. Ecoremic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 96D55, by 5A0 PM or October 16, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional novifcatwn by mail. conlact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits mitten comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project Naa OB I20 CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430.6691 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Puget Colony Homes CPA 2006-M-05 Proposed Land Use Map 0 200 400 eu<r,,.m;r rx..nyrsa ndeh6v,hd, fi s„M �;,. nm�„�"p sluay.rve>.� l r. I — Renlan GiIY a� ReliOenigt Lo-r panyty Lihmis Rpatlpnuel Sari Famrr If you would like to receive further information an the environmental review of this proposed project, complete this form and return to, City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055_ You muse return Lets tone to receive future information regarding the envfronmentaf determinaffon for this project. File No./Name: LUA06-120, R, ECF PUGET COLONY REZONE 2D06-1111-05 NAME. ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. NOA pylzp CERTIFICATION I, i Q ,hereby certify that . ,.%, ;pc, .,f rho a}tintrn A�niamnnl were plil by me in 3 conspicuous places or nee DATE: Q 12d 1 U) SIGNED: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for it C on the ELM day of. C:i Lam? CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2nd day of October, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance document, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name RagweatIng Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners See Attached (Signature of Sen STATE OF WASHINGTON ) " SS COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker �,r�ti`rrr+� 11. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act for t +++� purposes mentioned in the instrument. -' \.�*�a�ti�uti�4'+ate Dated: Notary Public in and Pfthe Sate of Iasi ngton ,0 _ 0 Notary (Print): 3 yj My appointment expires: ' , ��'t k D Project Name: Puget Colony Rezone Project Number: LUA06-120, R, ECF us , r.,ra =� = to 11V OirW N5% "-% template - affidavit of service by mailing .. AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW - Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160`h Ave SE 39015 — 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region " Duwamish Tribal Office ` Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division ' Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web_ Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template - affidavit of service by mailing ADRIAN NICHOLAS W ARCHER DOROTHY M I ARCHER LOLA L 13319 142ND AVE SE 14117 SE 132ND ST 14004 SE 133RD ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 BADSTUEBNER ALAN E BAMFORD ROBERT E+NANCY J BATSON JUANITA M 13706 139TH AVE SE 14024 SE 133RD 14017 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 BEGALKA BRENT E+KAREN L BEHAN DAVID L BOZEMAN ERNEST O 14023 SE 132ND ST 13522 138TH AVE SE 13808 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 BRANDT CORY RICHARD BREWER AUDREY BULOW JOHNNY DERAY+RIENA M BRANDT CINDY JOY 13710 139TH AVE SE 13915 SE 136TH PL 3038 198TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SAMMAMISH WA 98075 BURNHAM DAVID W CADWELL JESSICA L CLOSE DAVID F 14104 SE 133RD ST 14111 SE 134TH ST 13715 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 COOK FRANK J COUGHLIN MICHAEL J+SHIRLEYA CROSSMAN JOYCE K 14012 SE 133RD 14126 SE 135TH ST 13613 139TH SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 DAVIS JEFFERY W & SHERRI R DAY KENNETH M DE SULER JAMES 13561 139TH PL SE 5012 NE IST CT 13721 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 DEMBOWSKI ALFRED S DOWNING DYER P+SANDRA L FEIDER D F 14010 SE 134TH ST 13807 139TH AVE SE 13627-139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 FJETLAND WILLIAM K+MICHELLE FORD STEVE B FROST PATRICIA L 14118 SOUTHEAST 135TH ST 14723 180TH PL SE 13528 138TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 GALUSHA DICK & ELAINE GLANDON THEODORE F+BEVERLY GLASOW BRYAN 1051 SHINE RD 13405 142ND AVE SE 14019 SE 133RD ST PORT LUDLOW WA 98365 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 GOBLE EDWARD E+MARY ANN HAISLEY RICHARD HAUGEN CHRISTOPHER A 13512 138TH AVE SE 13557 139TH PL SE 14105 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 HIMES BRUCE W+JEANMARIE IVERSON WILLIAM F JAY GERARD 14111 SE 132ND ST 13819 139TH AVE SE 13550 139TH PL SE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 JOHNSON PHILIP RYAN+MORANN JOHNSTON GEORGE E+EMILY S JONES DOUGLAS H+SHARON R 13564 139TH PL SE 13558 139TH PL SE 14011 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 JORDAN DAVID R KAIMAKIS PAUL + SANDRA KAPELKA BENJAMIN 14004 SE 135TH ST 2033 144TH AVE SE 14100 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 BELLEVUE WA 98007 RENTON WA 98059 KORES CHARLOTTE J KREAL APRIL LACHER THOMAS C 13702 139TH AVE SE 13217 142ND AVE SE 13606 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 LAFFAW BRIAN H LAMB ROS B & LINDA M LANE RICHARD/CAROL 14112 SE 133RD ST 10932 NE 49TH ST 13814 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 KIRKLAND WA 98033 RENTON WA 98059 LEA IVYL T LEROY MICHAEL J+KERRI L LINDBLAD DOUGLAS R 7443 NE 123RD PL 13504 138TH AVE SE 13825 139TH AVE SE KIRKLAND WA 98034 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 LOREEN STANLEY L LUEDTKE DOUGLAS E+SHANNON M LUQUETTE ROY L+KATHLEEN M 13605 139TH SE 14018 SE 135TH ST 13714 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 LYTLE RICHARD A & LAURIE J MARSDEN RICHARD L MARSH ROLAND F+PATRICIA 13205 142ND AVE SE 1818 S 310TH ST 13720 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 RENTON WA 98059 MEDZEGIAN PAMELA L MILLER ALAN L MOORE AZALEE 13567 139TH PL SE 13568 139TH PL SE 13906 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 MOREILLON DAN R+JANA NASH MORGAN & DEBRA NEEDHAM THOMAS 14110 SE 136TH ST 14005 SE 135TH ST 13325 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 OLESON KEVIN PELTON THOMAS C PETERSON ALEXA A 13709 139TH AVE SE 5015 NE 15T ST 13554 139TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 PHAM BERNIE PUHRMANN JAMES D+ALEXANDER RANDALL STEVEN A+KELLY L 14113 SE 133RD ST ]ANINE B14026 SE 135TH ST 14112 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059-4932 RIGOR A B RIVERA JOSE A JR SCHUBERT VALENE 4916 NE 1ST CT 5345 E MCLELLAN LOT 20 4923 NE 1ST CT RENTON WA 98059 MESA AZ 85205 RENTON WA 98059 SCOTT F R SEAMAN ROBERT D+ANNETTE B SIRES DONALD H+PAULA A 13621 139TH AVE SE 13802 139TH AVE SE 13801 139TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SMITH DALE H SMITH ELEXA LEE SMITH MATTHEW ] 13909 SE 139TH ST 14105 143RD AVE SE 13913 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SPENCER RICHARD+PAMELA STAUFF RICHARD J STRAUB BRIAN C+TAKAKO 14013 SE 135TH ST 13813 139TH SE 13921 SE 136TH PL RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 TATMAN JAMIE L+MCGINNIS TOBY R THOMPSON BRADLEY K+LISSA C TRAN TAN 14103 SE 132ND ST 13559 139TH PL 5E 660 SW 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98146 TREADWELL RENE+BISHAI LILY TRUDNOWSKI THOMAS & DIANE L VAN GEYSTEL CHERYL 14005 SE 133RD ST 13901 SE 139TH ST 25507 75TH AVE SW RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 VASHON WA 98070 VANGEYSTEL ROBERT+CHERYL WELCH JASON S+VICTORIA J WENG DANNY+LINDA A PHUNG 25507 75TH AVE SW 14106 SE 135TH ST PO BOX 59356 VASHON WA 98070 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98058 WESTCOTf DAYNA WILLITS ROBERT A YURCHENKO IRINAS I+VLADIMIR 13703 139TH AVE SE 13905 SE 136TH PL 14013 SE 133RD ST RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 Petersen Inez Cook F. Jay Cave Robert 3306 Lake Washington Blvd #3 14012 SE 133rd St 1813 NE 24th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98056 Redfern Richard Zorbin Armando Loreen Stan 2000 NE 20th St 2400 NE 10th PI 13605 139th Ave SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Downing D ANDERSON ARNE C+HAGERMAN ANDERSON STEVEN D+KIMBERLY 13807 139th Ave SE DANIELLE C 13656 SE 135TH ST Renton, WA 98059 13521 138TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 BELMONDO JAMES BELTRAN RICARDO Q BERG RUSSELL H 134 DUVALL AVE NE 2108 BLAINE SE 14017 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BLACKWELL JOHN H CHERMACK ROSEMARY CONNER HOMES COMPANY 13920 SE 141ST ST 13904 SE 141ST 846 108TH AVE NE STE 202 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 BELLEVUE WA 98004 CORWIN PERRY DANG PHU VAN+HIEN T+TRAN BE DEVEREAUX GREG L+DEBORAH J 4601 37TH SW 14021 SE 136TH ST 14004 SE 141ST ST SEATTLE WA 98126 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 FUJIMURA YOSHIO GREEN NORMAN W & CYNTHIA A HANDLEY CHARLES T+BRENDA L 13928 SE 141ST 14128 SE 132ND ST 19503 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 HINES JOHN J LANDON CRAIG LEONARD BUILDERS INC 13648 SE 135TH ST 10520 169TH AVE SE 2687 SW 172ND RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98166 MARZI E W MAURICE RICHARD P+DEBORAH L MCCALL PAULYNE 13505 138TH AVE SE 14020 SE 139TH ST 1916 PIKE PL #1234 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98101 MCMAHILL SCOTT A+ROBIN FORS MICHAUD TIMOTHY P+LORA ] MILLER MARY E 14125 SE 136TH ST 13649 140TH PL SE 13624 140TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 NEWCOMB PHILLIP L+MARY E 2112 DUVALL AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 STEWART BARBARA M 13912 SE 141ST ST RENTON WA 98059 NIEMI DIAN B 14020 SE 141ST RENTON WA 98059 STUTH RICHARD 14113 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 SNOW MICHAEL T & JODI E 14114 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 URY KATHERINE Y TRST 14011 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 USHER DAVID R+DENISE A WILLITS ROBERT A YAHN CLYDE 13643 SE 135TH ST 13905 SE 136TH PL 14100 SE 132ND RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 2, 2006 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA06-120, R, ECF APPLICATION NAME: Puget Colony Rezone ! CPA 2006-M-05 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Based on property owner interest, the City is proposing to rezone this subject area from R-8 to R-4 zoning. This will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property from IRS land use designation to RLD land use designation. PROJECT LOCATION: South of NE 2ntl Street, North of SE 141" Street, East of Duvall Avenue NE, West of Hoquiam Avenue NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 21, 2006 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Rezone Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: NIA Location where application may be reviewed: PlanninglBuilding/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98056 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on this issue was held before the Planning Commission on September 20. 2005. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation, but is proposed to be changed to the Residential Low Density (RLD) land use designation. The proposed change is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004, Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist prepared December 15, 2005 Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: This nen-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal on the subject site, Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson Senior Planner, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 16, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project NOA 06-120 CONTACT PERSON: N ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Proposed Land Use Map 0 200 400 Ecotromic Dcniopment, Neighborhoods & Strategic Plannins + a ASax!'iol9cli. AdniWiimkx ^^^^ Study Area c. DO Rosario — Renton City Residential Low Density i June 290 6 Limits = Residential Single Family If you would like to receive further information on the environmental review of this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. You must return this form to receive future Information regarding the environmental determination for this project. File No./Name: LUA06-120, R, ECF PUGET COLONY REZONE 2006-M-05 NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOA 06-120 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 29, 2006 To: File From: Development Planning Subject: Puget Colony Rezone LUA06-1 20, R, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on October 23, 2006. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Pocum ntll City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6588 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Rebecca Lind COMPANY (it applicable): EDNSP Department ADDRESS: 1 055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6588 CONTACT PERSON NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (v R o SEP Z 12006 RECEIVED PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: 2006 City lnitiatd CPAs. rqv i' 1�, i�/J,. f C PROJECTfADDRESS(Sj1LOCATION AND ZIP CODE. City Wide. Amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation is shown on the attached vicinity map. q 8_a5 I KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation- 6928000-010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 270, 280, 290, 300, 310, 320, 330, 340, 350, 370, 380, 390, 400, 410, 420, 430, 440, 450, 460, 470, 480, 490, 500, 510, 520, 530, 540, 550, , 570, 580, PO, 600, 610, 620, 630, 640 Gz EXISTING LAND USE(S):n/a. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation- single family detached housing built at densities of 3-4 units per acre. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): nla. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation- single family detached housing at densities of 3-4 units per acre. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:): n/a. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation (RS) Residential Single Family in Renton's Comprehensive Plan PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): n/a. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation (RLD) Residential Low Density in Renton's Comprehensive Plan EXISTING ZONING: n/a. Foramendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation Renton R-8, 8 units per gross acre (upon annexation- scheduled for January 2006) PROPOSED ZONING (if applicabl : n F- ndment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation Renton R-4, 4 units per net acre. SITE AREA (in square feet): n/a. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignatio- 636,084 ft2 (14.6 acres) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE if applicable): n/a !)kj Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 12/15/05 PR( CT INFOF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): n1a. For amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesi nation Er ht DUI net acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): n1a NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n1a NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): n1a NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n1a NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n1a MA TION contim PROJECT VALUE: n1a IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n1a ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO 1 ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq, ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE NE 114 OF SECTION 15 , TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5E , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (For amendment 1) Puget ColonyRedesignatlon, only) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. RezoneAm. 1 f uget Colony, onW 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2. Environmental Checklist 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Names) Rebecca Lind declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be his/heritheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Rebecca Lind (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devservlf=ndplamirW=sterapp.dm 12115105 Additional PZAs for Puget Colony (expanded 327615025001, 327615025001, 327615020002, 327615007009, 327615015002, 327615010003, 327615004006, 386350002005, 327615013007, 386350009000, 327615003008, 327615011001, 327615005003, 327615007009, 327615010003, 386350002005, 327615013007, 386350009000, 327615003008, 327615011001, 327615005003, 386350003003, 327615001002, 386350001007, 327615021000, 327615029003, 327615027502, 327615015002, 327615004006, 386350003003, 327615001002, 386350001007, 327615021000, 327615029003, 327615027502 327615002000, 386350006006, 327615026009, subdivisions 327615024004, 386350008002, 327615012009, 327615032007, 327615023006, 327615030506, 327615018006, 327615009005, 386350007004, 327615020002, 327615002000, 386350006006, 327615026009, 327615023006, 327615018006, 327615009005, 386350007004, 327615006001, 327615016000, 327615014005, 327615024004, 386350008002, 327615012009, 327615032007, 327615030506, 327615006001, 327615016000, 327615014005, outside PC) 327615028005, 327615008007, 386350005008, 327615019004, 327615022008, 386350004001, 127615017008, 152305902107, 327615028005, 327615008007, 386350005008, 327615019004, 327615022008, 386350004001, 327615017008, 15230590210711 Project Narrative 2006 City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Puget Colony and Vicinity Proposed Map Request From Residential Single Family (R-8 zoning) to Residential Low Density (R-10 zoning) The Puget Colony neighborhood is an existing platted neighborhood currently built out with .25 to .33-acre lots. Mr. Jay Gook, property owner in the area, approached the City with a request to consider R4 zoning for the area as he feels it is more consistent with the existing development pattern. The neighborhood abuts the existing Low Density Single Family designation and the Iower density R-4 zoning could logically be extended to it. W. Cook requested that the City Council initiate a comprehensive plan amendment to evaluate his neighborhood and others with similar conditions in the immediate vicinity. Covenants approved with the plat restricts further subdivision within this area. Upon review of the land use map, staff identified other adjacent subdivisions that are similarly platted and not yet annexed (see Vicinity Map, Attachment 1). The City Council agreed to initiate a review of this area as part of the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments. This expanded review should occur under a City initiated rather than private application because it involves multiple properties and is an area wide zoning action rather than as request for re -designation of a specific private property. C� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can_ If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:IEDNSPIComp PlanlAmendments12006lSEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc12/15/05 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2006 City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Rebecca Lind, staff contact x 6588 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: December 15, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NIA 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NIA 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NIA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NIA 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City Council approval of the Amendments. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. 1) Puget Colony and Vicinity Proposed Map Request From Residential Single Family (R-8 zoning) to Residential Low Density (R-10 zoning) The Puget Colony neighborhood is an existing platted neighborhood currently built out with .25 to .33-acre lots. Mr. Jay Cook, property owner in the area, approached the City with a request to consider R-4 zoning for the area as he feels it is more consistent with the existing development FI:IEDNSPIComp Plan\Amendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 2 pattern. The neighborhood abuts the existing Low Density Single Family designation and the lower density R-4 zoning could logically be extended to it. Mr. Cook requested that the City Council initiate a comprehensive plan amendment to evaluate his neighborhood and others with similar conditions in the immediate vicinity. Covenants approved with the plat restrict further subdivision within this area. Upon review of the land use map, staff identified other adjacent subdivisions that are similarly platted and not yet annexed (see Vicinity Map, Attachment 1). The City Council agreed to initiate a review of this area as part of the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments. This expanded review should occur under a City initiated rather than private application because it involves multiple properties and is an area wide zoning action rather than as request for re -designation of a specific private property. 2) Capital Facilities Element Text Update The Capital Facilities Element will be updated to reflect changes in the capital projects since the last update in 2004, to incorporate adoption of the Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan; and update growth projection and target data as needed 3) Land Use Element and Community Design Element Updates The Land Use Element and Community Design Element will be updated to reflect changes in the Village Center land Use designation needed for consistency with the Highlands Subarea Plan, and to consider housekeeping changes to policy order, organization, and language to improve implementation of the plan by identifying which policies are used for mapping criteria, drafting of zoning and other development standards, project review and other specific purposes to be evaluated in this review. 4) Transportation Element Update The Transportation Element will be updated to reflect changes in the capital projects since the last update in 2004, and to make other housekeeping amendments as needed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range it known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Amendment 1) Puget Colony Redesignation is shown in the attached vicinity map. The rest of the changes are City wide. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 9. EARTH General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) N/A H:IEDNSPIComp PIan\Amendments=06XSEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 3 C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. NIA d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NIA e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NIA f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NIA g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NIA 2. AJR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NIA b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NIA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NIA 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 9) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NIA H:VECNSPVComp PlanVAmendments120OMSEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 4 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. VIKI 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NIA 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NIA b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NIA C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. NIA 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NIA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: H:1EDNSP1Comp PIan\Amendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc NIA. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation NIA b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NIA C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NIA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NIA. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other NIA b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NIA c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain NIA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NIA. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES HAMNSMomp Plan\Amendments120o61SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doe 6 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. WA 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NIA b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? WA 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N/A b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. HAEDNSPXComp PIan\Amendmentsl2 MSEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 7 NIA C. Describe any structures on the site. NIA d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NIA e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? NIA f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? NIA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NIA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NIA. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NIA j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NIA k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NIA 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA HAEDNSMomp PIanVkmendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 8 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NIA 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. NIA b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NIA 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NIA b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NIA C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NIA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NIA 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NIA b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NIA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NIA HAMNSP1Comp PlanlAmendments1200MEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 9 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NIA b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NIA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. NIA b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NIA C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NIA d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NIA e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NIA f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NIA g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA 15. PUBLIC SERVICES H:IEDNSP\Comp P1anVkmendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 10 a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NIA b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NIA 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. NIA b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. nUA C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part_ Proponent: i �64�Iel�7z Name Printed: r` iDt'C(li. 1 J7G Date: 15, HAEDNSIMComp P1an\Amendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 11 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Thee sheets- should only be used for a,vtrts ;ftrrtcislans on01, ' d'd Px,ms: Youo neat need fo;filf dtat.ihesehetsfor pions-)' Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not increase discharge to water, emission to air, toxic substances, or noise. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NIA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal would not affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: NIA I How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal would not be likely to deplete energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NIA 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? There would not be any likely affects on areas designated for governmental protection.. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: NIA 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This proposal is compatible with existing land and shoreline plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: H:IEDNSPIComp PIanL4mendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 12 NIA 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal would likely not affect transportation or public services. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: NIA 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. This proposal is compatible with requirements for the protection of the environment SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 6L 'L`eelz�, Name Printed: F-Y-� CI"a • k)! Date: D1, ec. 154 Z.q<,_ ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 8198 HAEDNSMomp PIaMAmendments120061SEPA Checklist City Initiated CPAs 2006.doc 13 Project Narrative 2006 City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1) Puget Colony and Vicinity Proposed Map Request From Residential Single Family (R-S zoning) to Residential Low Density (R-10 zoning) The Puget Colony neighborhood is an existing platted neighborhood currently built out with .25 to .33-acre 1 s. Mr. Jay Cook, property owner in the area, approacVthhewith a request to considerR-4 z ing for the area as he feels it is more consistent wig development pattern. The neig orhood abuts the existing Low Density Single Fation and the lower density R-4 ing could logically be extended to it. Mr. Cothat the City Council initiate a co hensive plan amendment to evaluate his nand others with similar conditions in the Npediate vicinity. Covenants approved with the pXt restrict further subdivisio thin this area. Upon review of the land use map, staff identifi er adjacent subdivisi s that are similarly platted and not yet annexed (see Vicinity Map, Al ac nt 1). The City C ncil agreed to initiate a review of this area as part of the 2006 Comprehensi Plan amend nts. This expanded review should occur under a City initiated rather than privat plicati ause it involves multiple properties and is an area wide zoning action rather than as ue or re -designation of a specific private property. 2) Capital Facilities Element Text Update The Capital Facilities Element wi/beated\aws hanges in the capital projects since the last update in 2004, to incorporaten ofh School District Capital Facilities Plan; and update growth projectioget a 3) Land Use Element and The Land Use Element Village Center land Use to consider housekeepin implementation of Yew. of zoning and othe evaluated in this re 4) Design Element (_ommunity Design Element will beNR ,ignadon needed for consistency with hanges to policy order, organization, and by identifying which policies are used for anent standards, project review and other Update dated to reflect changes in the Highlands Subarea Plan, and to improve g criteria, drafting purposes to be The Transpogfition Element will be updated to reflect changes in the capital projects since the last update in 2964, and to make other housekeeping amendments as needed.