Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1d_ EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT Df o� ; DATE: April 8, 2011 TO: Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist - CED FROM: Cindy Moya, Records Management Specialist SUBJECT: Returned Recorded Documents: Bill of Sale - #20110124000048 (Puget Colony SP 1 & 2 — Classic Concepts V, LLC) The attached document has been recorded with King County and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest. The original will be retained by the City Clerk's Office. Thank you. Attachment cc: LUA-06-146 LUA-06-147 hAcityclerl\recor& specialisticorrespondence & memos - cindyVecorded documentslbill of sale - olson.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 111111111111111111111111 20110124000048 CITY OF RENTON BS 63.00 PAGE-001 OF 002 01/24/2011 09:13 KING COUNTY, WA BILL OF SALE I Proj Name: Puget Colony SP 1 &2 Property T.at Parcel Number: In dedicated ROW Project File #: _5'_5 4-1 0 Street Intersection: In SE 2 Place from Address: Hoquiam Ave. west 619 feet. In SE 2'd Street from Hoquiam 224 feet west. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Classic concepts V LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor, as named above, for, and in consideration of mutual benefits, hereby grants, bargains, sells and delivers to the Grantee, as named above, the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. of DI Water Main L.F. of Water Main L.F. of Water Main each of Gate Valves each of Gate Valves each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Tyke L.F. of DI Sewer Main 843 L.F. of 8 " PVC Sewer Main L.F. of " PVC Sewer Main 3 each of 48 Diameter Manholes each of Diameter Manholes each of Lift Stations STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Tyne 163 L.F. of 12 DI Storm Main 331 L.F. of 12 CPE Storm Main L.F. of Storm Main 1 each of Type 1 Storm Inlet/Outlet 4 each of Type 1 Storm Catch Basin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Including Curb -Gutter, Sidewalk, Asphalt Pavement) Curb -Gutter, Sidewalk 408 L.F. c�,o)l By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to ciaim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever. C:1Wayne'slconner platslPugetlPuget Colony bill of sale.doclw7 Page 1 IN WITNESS WM OF, sai Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this! day of 20Lf. w"�b%1 &-fA4y �.�•.44E�► INDIVIDUAL FORM OF A CKNO WLEDGMENT Notary Sea] must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING } I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that W-, �t trukw'- •' n v,e S -7� C _ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument 6A CA Notary Public in and for the Siate of Washington Notary (Print) - l k -A — My appointment expires: a1�:QL .- 1,1q_ Dated: a r, st p Q. o -% REPRESENTATCVE FOAM OF AC%NOWI.EDGMENT Notary Sea] must be within box STATE OF WASH NGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: - CORPORATE FORM OFACK.NOW.I EAGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHIN[iTON } SS COUNTY OF ICING } On this day of, 20_, before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 0:IFor=TBPW\BIMISALE2.DOC1bh Page 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ity0f AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT D 6 6QJS� ' M E M a R A N Q U M DATE: January 19, 2011 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk's Office FROM: Carrie K. Olson, Plan Review x7235 SUBJECT: PUGET COLONY I SHORT PLATLUA06-147-SHPL Attached please find two sets of the above -referenced original mylars and three paper copies of the mylar for recording with King County. The recording instructions in order are as follows: 1. Record the short plat mylars. 2. Request King County to return one of the executed mylars to us for our records. Please have the Courier take these documents via 8-hour service. A check in the amount of $15.81 made out to Champion Couriers is attached. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000000.007.559.60.49.003. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Cc: Kayren Kittrick (Notice of Recording) Jan Conklin Yellow File iaplanrevieMcolsonlshortplats 20111puget colony i shpl 09m clerkrccord new format.doc COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC ° ����� DEVELOPMENT 8 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 18, 2011 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Department FROM: Carrie Olson, Development Services, Plan Review SUBJECT: PUGET COLONY I SHORT PLAT- LUA06-147-SHPL The Department of Community and Economic Development has reviewed and recommended approval of the Puget Colony I Short Plat. Requirements and conditions have been fulfilled and fees paid. Two original Mylar drawings are attached and are submitted for your review and signature. Please return mylars to me for recording. Thank you. cc: Yellow File 11I:\PtanRevicw\COLSOMShortplats 20101Puget Colony I SHPL 07m ZimSign New Format.doc COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC C DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 11, 2011 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review 0.0 SUBJECT: Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06--147-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: + Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. Status Of: Accepted_ Related Project #s Comments NA V V As-Builts d Cost Data Inventory V Bill of Sale d_ Easements (water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) d Reed of Dedication Square Footage: _d Restrictive Covenants Arneta, Please change note under LUA06-147 in Permits Plus regarding F e-in-Lieu f� Site lmprovementsi Maintenance Bond y Release Permit Bond Af Commentt: —T Date• ✓ �l Arneta Benninger Cc: Yellow File i:lplanreviewlcolsonlshonplats 20101puget colony i shpl 07m pr reviewstart newformat.doc Ity of COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 2010 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony I Short Plat, LU-06--147-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. Status Of: Accepted Related Proiect #s Comments NA V d As-Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) Deed of Dedication Square Footage: V Restrictive Covenants Arneta, Please change note under LUA06-147 in Permits Plus regard Fee -In -Lieu of Off - Site Improvements.•L�� Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments: Approval: _ Date: Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File i:lpianreviewlcolson\shortplats 20101puget colony i shpl Corn pr-ts reviewstart newformat.doc COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC Q � �C." k DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 2, 2010 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT, Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06--147-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: • Revised Short Plat Certificate + Lot Closures • Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. 5ta Accepted Y Related Proiect #s Comments NA V As-Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Casements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) V Deed of Dedication Square Footage: 1J Restrictive Covenants Sidewal M Fe in lieu of has not been collecte e h s calculated correctly under l- Q 47 H e the fees increased? Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments: ' .a �' ` Approval:Date: Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File iAplanreview\colsonlshortplats 20101puget colony i shpi 01m pr-ts reviewstart newfo at.do COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC d as t }°£ milli 11111DEVELOPMENT 9.4 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 2, 2010 TO: Bob Mac Onie, Technical Servic FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-SHPL and Legal Review Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Revised Short Plat Certificate • Lot Closures • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return, your comments as needed. Thanks. J Approval;�r l`�' _`�, --- , Date: t "2-L 1 �, Robert T N&ac Onie, Jr. Cc: Yellow File iaplanreviewlcolsonlshortplats 20101puget colony i shpl 0lm pr-ts reviewstart newformat.doc COMMUNITY P d � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Planning FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Reviewo SUBJECT: Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage of recording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Mitigation fees of $3,617.25 will be paid prior to recording. Fee -in -lieu of street improvements will be recalculated by Arneta Henninger upon her review. • SAD and SDC fees have been paid. • Demo Permit not required. • There are no critical areas onsite. • The latest short plat drawing is attached for your review. • The latest landscape drawing is attached for your approval. • PMT's will be provided with signed mylars. y Approval: f2� '- Date: c;7,a�1 Jerry Wasser, Planning 1APIanReview\C0LS0MShortglats 2010\Puget Colony l SHPL 05m PlanningReview.doc City of DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY 170601— ��� AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 28, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Gerald C. WassE�,%�/L! SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 1, LUA06-147 I conducted a landscape inspection in the field on the above -captioned project today. The planting materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan dated December 27, 2010. h:lcedlplanninglcurrent planninglgwlfinal plat memoslpuget colony shpl 1 landscape inspection.doe DATE: COMMUNITY & ECONOMICp ^�-�� DEVELOPMENT �� l M E M O R A N D U M December 27, 2010 TO: Jan Conklin, Development Services FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-SHPL A copy of the above mentioned short plat is attached for your information. if you have comments or changes in addressing, please let me know. e�0 iaplanreviewlcolsonlshortplats 20101pugct colony i shpl 04m jan c. reviews= newformat.doc Printed: 01-18-2011 .-ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-147 Payment Made: 01/18/2011 01:44 PM Receipt Number: R1100174 Total Payment: 3,617.25 Payee: CLASSIC CONCEPT V, LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR 1,464.00 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee 2,153.25 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Payment Check 9491 Account Balances Amount --------------------------- 3, 617.25 Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3025 305.000000.016.344 Sidewalk Mitigation Fee 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Sate/Short Plat 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Hgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobhyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE - USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Printed: 01-18-2011 Payment Made: ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Utility Services Permit RECEIPT Permit#: U070104 01/11/2008 03:57 PM Total Payment: 19,210.84 HOMES Current Payment Made to the Fallowing Items: Trans Account Code 4033 407.000000.018.343 4040 426.000000.018.388 4042 406,000000,018.343 4045 426.000000.018.388 4069 427.000000.018.368 Payments made for this receipt Description Receipt Number: R0800191 Payee: PUGET COLONY 1 & 21 CONNOR Stormwater Insp Approval Spec Util Connect Sewer Sewer Inspection Approvl Spec Assmt Dist, Sewer Spec Util Connect Stormw Amount ---------------- Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check 60820 19,210.84 Account Balances Trans Account Code 4028 000.000000.007.343 4033 407.000000.018.343 4040 426.000000.018.388 4042 406.000000.018.343 4044 406.000000.018.322 4045 426.000000.018,388 4050 000.000000.007.322 4056 425.000000.018.388 4057 405.000000.018.343 4059 405.000000.018.388 4061 407.000000.018,322 4069 427.000000.018.386 4074 000.000000.007.341 5025 000.000000.007.322 331.20 8,136.00 2,137.24 2,534.40 6,072.00 Description Balance Due Public Works Inspection .00 Stormwater Insp Approval .00 Spec Util Connect Sewer .00 Sewer Inspection Approvl .00 Sewer Permit .00 Spec Assmt Dist, Sewer .00 Right-of-way Constructn .00 Spec Util Connect Water .00 Water Inspection Approvl .00 Misc. Water Installation .00 Storm Water Permits .00 Spec Util Connect Stormw .00 Latecommer Admin Fees .00 Street Lighting Fee .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Printed: 01-18-2011 Payment Made: TY OF ]RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Utility Services Permit RECEIPT Permit#: U070104 07/12/2007 03:11 PM Total Payment: 2,468.48 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: Payee: CONNER HOMES CO Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ 4033 ------------------ 407.000000.018.343 ------------------------------ Stormwater Insp Approval ---------------- 331.20 4042 406.000000.018.343 Sewer Inspection Approvl 2,137.28 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check #58970 2,468.48 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 4028 000.000000.007.343 Public Works Inspection 4033 407.000000.018.343 Stormwater Insp Approval 4040 426.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Sewer 4042 406.000000.018.343 Sewer Inspection Approvl 4044 406.000000.018,322 Sewer Permit 4045 426.000000.018.388 Spec Assmt Dist, Sewer 4050 000,000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructs 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water 4057 405.000000.018.343 Water Inspection Approvl 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. Water Installation 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw 4074 000.000000.007.341 Latecommer Admin Fees 5025 000.000000.007.322 Street Lighting Fee Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 _00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0703555 Denis Law --- y Citof Mayor `I (ri", °t, iAft s A J o0 Department of Community and Economic Development January 14, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Wayne Jones Classic Concept V, LLC P.O. Box 146 Renton WA 98057 SUBJECT: Pacific Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-5HPL Dear Mr. Jones: The review submittal on the above -mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) 1. Provide a set of PMT's of.the final drawings. 2. Pay the. Transportation, Park and Fire Mitigation Fees in the amount of $3,617.25 for 3 lots under LUA06-147 made payable to the City of Renton. These fees may be paid at the Customer Services Counter on the 6th floor of Renton City Hall. When the above item is completed, you may submit the signed and notarized short plat rnylars (one original Mylar and one copy (on Mylar) of each sheet) along.with a check in the amount of $15.81(current courier fee) made out to Champion Couriers. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, new Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review E-mailed To: kiv@coredesip,ninc.com rhs coredesi ninc.com Cc: City Clerk's File (LUA06-147-SHPL) IAPlankeview\C0LS0MShortplats 201 ilPuget Colony I 5HPL 08L RcquestMytarStop.doc Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov of 4 Department of Community and Economic Development December 15, 2010 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Wayne Jones Classic Concept V, LLC P,O. Box 146 Renton WA 98057 SUBJECT: Pacific Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-SHPL. Dear Mr. Jones: The review submittal on the above -mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once changes have been completed please resubmit three copies of the short plat drawings and three copies of any other related documents. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) 1. The submitted landscape plan is conceptual in that it does not identify specific species of trees and other planting materials. In addition to the required landscaping, 3 replacement trees (that is replacement trees for those significant trees removed) must also be shown. The applicant must submit a final landscape plan for review and approval prior to recording the short plat. 2. The City of Renton Administrator of the Public Works Department (note the department name change) is city official who signs this short plat; update the City of Renton signature block. 3. Rename the "DEDICATION/CERTIFICATION" block title to "OWNER'S CERIFICATION." 4. It is my understanding that Stephen J. Scheri, PLS is no longer in the employ of Core Design and therefore will not be the stamping and signing surveyor. The Surveyor's Certificate, signature line and stamp need to be changed to that of the actual stamping surveyor. 5. On sheet 2 of 2 the quarter corner common to Sections 15 & 16 is incorrectly noted as "Renton Control Point No. 76" when it is actual "No. 476." 6. The new lot addresses can be found on the attached; note said addresses on the short plat drawing. 7. The. latest short plat certificate submitted, Oct 13, 2010, indicates the property is vested in Classic Concepts V, LLC. Please update the owner's name on Page 1 of 2. I T1anRevieYAC0IS01d1Shottplats 20 1 OTuget Coiony i SHPL 03L Change RequestStop.doc Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Page 2 December 16, 2010 The attached memo from Arneta Henninger, dated December 2, 2010, indicates additional documentation to be provided to complete this project. . Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact meat (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review E-mailed To: kjv@coredesigninc.com Cc: Yellow File (LUA06-147-SHPL) NT 10EZ- 3 r '-"-•`.•' � Q4"lE 1==tVOT LDORTECI '41'22"'."� ------ -- � N8s 1'os"w 4 ? -..r✓, to L=198.48 5 .00 !� -..3o�! ELECTRIC - A EASEMENT TO PUGET 5 1 f Iti 4 AND LIGHT REC. NO. 640423 .,.. r l IN r r r TAK J ..1 12 IE C 83 47 r i J 1 I j l i j + i OUTFALL 30' r r 1 ! 1 12"IE W=383.29 I! i r I r 1 4 ` 1p92t &F. ci ! I J I x• y 53 1 I r 54. cf x•�� f_. J r r r I � I I � " f (163,79 10' DRAINAGE I i li EASEMENT 4 a COMMUNITY & cityor ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: December 7, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Planning FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT, Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA-06-147-SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage of recording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Mitigation fees of $3,617.25 will be paid prior to recording. Fee -in -lieu of street improvements will be recalculated by Arneta Henninger upon her review. • SAD and SDC fees have been paid. • Demo Permit not required. • There are no critical areas onsite_ • The latest landscape drawing is attached for your approval. PMT's will be provided with signed mylars. Approval: Date: Jerry Wasser, Planning Cc: Yellow File :T1anReview\C0LS0N\Shortpla1s 2010\Puget Colony I SI IPL 02ni PlanninpReview.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City �S AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Gerald C. Wasser SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 1, LUA06-147 reviewed the submittal for recording Puget Colony Short Plat 1. The submitted landscape plan is conceptual in that it does not identify specific species of trees and other planting materials. In addition to the required landscaping, 3 replacement trees (that is replacement trees for those significant trees removed) must also be shown. The applicant must submit a final landscape plan for review and approval prior to recording the short plat. hAcedlplanninglcurrent planninglgwUmal plat memos' aget colony shpl 1 commcnts.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 6, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Bob Mac Onie x-7369 1 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 1, LUA-06-147-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The City of Renton Administrator of the Public Works Department (note the department name change) is city official who signs this short plat; update the City of Renton signature block. Rename the "DEDICATION / CERTIFICATION" block title to "OWNER'S CERIFICATION." It is my understanding that Stephen J. Scheri, PLS is no longer in the employ of Core Design and therefore will not be the stamping and signing surveyor. The Surveyor's Certificate, .signature line and stamp need to be changed to that of the actual stamping surveyor. On sheet 2 of 2 the quarter corner common to Sections 15 & 16 is incorrectly noted as "Renton Control Point No. 7W when it is actual "No. 47$" The new lot addresses can be found on the attached; note said addresses on the short plat drawing. op K-To`-�Zo c" hafile sysllnd -land subdivision & surveying records�Ind-20 -short plats1047 101206.doc R , / S',yJei Ai T. DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets" Private access easements* Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,564 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density square feet square feet square feet 2. square feet 3. Z d,l3 square feet 4. . � _77 6 acres 5. 3 units/lots 6. 6. Z E3 = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 3 ,i J R:1PWIDEVSERV1FormslP]anningldensiry.doc LasLUpdu: I110004 HEcovEb I iL- _..TO TITLE INSURANCE CONIPM, 3400 COLMMIA CENTER, 701 STR AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat SECOND CERTIFICATE OrderNo.: '!1225600 In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of1the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that th� title to the following descn-bed land situate in said KING County, to -wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: CLASSIC CONCEPTS V, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $2 0 0.0 0 TAX $ 17.60 Records examined to OcCober 13, 2010 at 8:00 A.M. CjtY of Renton CMCAGO'rrrLEiNStA�CECONFANY Harming Division a u Wes' NOV 2 3 2010 eyv MIKE HARRIS Title Off f7(Erf (206) 628 628-5623 �71L� i sz�zAan/tzs9o/�c O TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN f OrderNo.: 1225600 SHORT Pi AT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ PARCEL A: THE WEST 37 FEET OF LOT 61, AND LOT 62 EXCEPT THE WEST 19 FEET THEREOF,] PUGET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OP KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 88121025, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8904060602_) PARCEL B: THE WEST 19 FEET OF LOT 62, AND LOT 63, PUGET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 8812025, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 89040606C2_) PARCEL C: LOT 64, PUGET COLONY }TOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED INIVOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ' CIRCAG0 TTTLE INSURANCE COMPANY � CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1122,5600 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. ; B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed �y an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Amy lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compen' ation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter punished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electri Fly or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, prjeceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including casements or equitable servitudes. I_ Water rights, claims, or title to water. K THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THF' LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). �� SMgi M/a31694/w¢ CHICAGO TT£I_E INSURANCE CONTANY A _ .. GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN Order N4: 1225600 SHORT FLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) i EXCEPTIONS A 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONSr EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICA`I;IONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF PUGET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. s 2. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRxCTIONS, EASEMENTS;, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE $OUNDARY/7;T LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8905150268. c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: r-T n z GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: 5 FEET PARALLEL AND ADJACENT'TO THE ROAD FRONTAGE RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 10, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6404210 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY PURPOSE: UTILITY SYSTEMS FOR GAS AND ELECTRICITY AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: OCTOBER 1, 2010 RECORDING NUMBER: 20101001000059 5. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO. THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE-GROUND.AS PAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUdH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 79509 6. CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JUNE 21, 1996 CMCACrO Tii'F F. INSiIRANCE COWANS?' O TITLE INSLTRANCE COWAN Order No!: 1225600 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) i EXCEPTION RECORDING NUMBER: 9GO6210966 REGARDING: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR S.A4liARY SEWER SERVICE 7. G TERAL AND SPECIAL 'TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER I OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: PARCEL A 2010 692800-0620-06- 2146 $ 25,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 290.71 PAID: $ 290.71 UNPAID: $ 0.00 c 8. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID OF NOVEMBER I OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B 2010 692800-0630-04 2146 $ 25,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 290.71 PAID: $ 290.71 UNPAID: $ 0.00 a 9_ GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, D ILYINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAX 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID U� NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2010 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 692800-0640-02 LEVY CODE: 2146 SWLAT�3/IZ-1 90/� CMCAGO TBIE INSURANCE COMPANY O TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN OrderNo.t 1225600 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCEED ULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL C $ 25,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 290.71 PAID: $ 290.71 UNPAID: $ 0.00 Ac 10. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR CLASSIC CONCEPTS V, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. a 11. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS CERTIFICATE IS BASED ON INFO PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINE HEREIN. THE PARTIES MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. as NOTE 2: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION PST THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCK 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PTNS'OF LOTS 61-64, VOL 8G OF PLATS, PG 59. END OF SCHEDULE B i STKA Tn 3/12-n,90/EK CHiCAGO iAMF,INSURANCE COMPANY PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 1 CORE PROJECT NO. 06124 Plat Map Checks 08/20/07 SJS Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29"' Place, #101 Bellevue, WA 98007 425-885-7877 City of Renton Planning Division NOV. 2 3 'ahU RECOVER LOT BLK 1 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 3000 178491.85 1314627.91 N 00018'51" E 161.93 502 178653.78 1314628.80 N 89041'09" W 50.00 503 178654.05 1314578.80 RADIUS: 1700.00 LENGTH: 198.48 CHORD: 198.37 DELTA: 06041'22" CHORD BRG: N 86020'28" W PC-R: N 00018'51" E PT-R: N 07000'13" E RADIUS POINT: 517 180354.03,1314588.12 TANGENT: 99.35 3001 178666.31 1314380.84 S 07000'13" W 30.00 510 178636.93 1314377.18 S 07000'13" W 139.05 509 178498.92 1314360.22 S B8029'12" E 163.77 51.2 178494.59 1314523.94 S 88029'12" E 74.00 518 178492.64 1314597.91 S 88029'12" E 30.01 3000 178491.85 1314627.91 Closure Error Distance> 0.0030 Error Searing> S 82°53122" E Closure Precision> 1 in 280776.2 Total Distance> 847.25 LOT AREA: 41941 SQ FT OR 0.9628 ACRES BLOCK 1 TOTAL AREA: 62753 SQ FT OR 1.4406 ACRES i Lot Report 8/17/2007 10:19 Lot File: P:\2006106124\Carlson\Lot Files1SP l.lot CRD File> P:\2006106124\Carlson106124.crd LOT BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING FASTING 510 178636,93 1314377.18 S 07000'13" W 139.05 509 178498.92 1314360.22 S 88029112" E 163.77 512 178494.59 1314523.94 N 00018151" E 130.60 511 178625.19 1314524.66 RADIUS: 1730.00 LENGTH: 147.99 CHORD: 147.94 DELTA: 04054105" CHORD BRG: N 85026149" W PC-R: N 02°06'08" E PT-R: N 07°00'13" E RADIUS POINT: 517 180354.03,1314588.12 TANGENT: 74.04 510 178636.93 1314377.18 Closure Error Distance> 0.0044 Error Bearing> S 15°54'21" W Closure Precisions 1 in 130984.9 Total Distance> 581.42 LOT AREA: 20813 SQ FT OR 0.4778 ACRES BLOCK 1 TOTAL AREA: 20813 SQ FT OR 0.4776 ACRES + Lot Report 8/17/2007 08:57 Lot File: P:\2006\06124\Carlson\Lot Files\SP l.lot CRD File> P:\2006\06124\Carlson\06124.crd LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 3004 178497.48 1314414.80 N 88029112" W 54.59 509 178498.92 1314360.22 N 07000'13" E 139.05 510 178636.93 1314377.18 RADIUS: 1730.00 LENGTH: 49.33 CHORD: 49.33 DELTA: 01°38'02" CHORD BRG: S 83048'48" E PC-R: N 07°00'13" E PT-R: N 05022111" E RADIUS POINT: 517 180354.03,1314588.12 TANGENT: 24.67 3005 178631.62 1314426.22 S 04052T0011 W 134.63 3004 178497.48 1314414.80 Closure Error Distance> 0.0082 Error Bearing> N 35°25'52" W Closure Precision> 1 in 46215.7 Total Distance> 377.60 LOT AREA: 7092 SQ FT OR 0.1628 ACRES Lot Report 8/17/2007 10:08 Lot File: P:\2006\06124\Carlson\Lot Files\SP 1.lot CRD File> P:\2006\06124\Carlson\06124.crd LOT 2 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# SEARING DISTANCE NORTHING FASTING 3002 178496.03 1314469.37 N 88029'12" W 54.59 3004 178497.48 1314414.80 N 04052'00" E 134.63 3005 178631.62 1314426.22 RADIUS: 1730.00 LENGTH: 49.33 CHORD: 49.33 DELTA: 01038'01" CHORD BRG: S 85026'49" E PC-R: N 05022'11" E PT-R: N 03°44'10" E RADIUS POINT: 517 180334.03,1314588.12 TANGENT: 24.67 3003 178627.70 1314475.39 S 02037'08" W 131.81 3002 178496.03 1314469.37 Closure Error Distance> 0.0030 Error Bearing> N 50008'36" W Closure Precision> 1 in 123439.8 Total Distance> 370.35 LOT AREA: 6912 SQ FT OR 0.1587 ACRES LOT 3 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 512 178494.59 1314523.94 N 88029'12" W 54.59 3002 178496.03 1314469.37 N 02037'08" E 131.81 3003 178627.70 1314475.39 RADIUS: 1730.00 LENGTH: 49.33 CHORD: 49.33 DELTA: 01038'02" CHORD BRG: S 87004'51" E PC-R: N 03044110" E PT-R: N 02006'08" E RADIUS POINT: 517 180354.03,1314588.12 TANGENT: 24.67 511 178625.19 1314524.66 S 00018'51" W 130.60 512 178494.59 1314523.94 Closure Error Distance> 0.0041 Error Bearing> S 23°21128" W Closure Precision> 1 in 89342.1 Total Distance> 366.32 LOT AREA: 6809 SQ FT OR 0.1563 ACRES dftk Denis Law City y N� rJ .' !. N May 6, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator - Jennifer M. Wolf Steiner DOUGLAS 100 W Main Street #7 Tustin, CA 92780 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Puget Colony Short Plat 1 / City of Renton file LUA067147, SHPL-A Dear Ms. Wolf: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Under Ordinance No. 5452 (RMC 4-1-080F) authorization. has been given to the Planning Director to approve an additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after April 1, 200.9. We understand that you are still working to complete this project and will require additional time. Therefore, your request for the two-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452 is hereby granted. You now have until May 14, 2011 to record this project. You should be aware this is a one-time only extension and the project is not recorded by the new expiration date it will become null and void and you will need to resubmit all application materials. I hope this extension meets your needs and that your project can.be completed. You may call Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, , C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Chris Willis - Bank of America / Owner(s) City of Renton File No. LUA06-147 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Kayren Kittrick, Plan Reviewer Renton City Hall 9 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa_gov Steiner April 27, 2010 D 0 U G L A S City �f Renton Planning Division Chip Vincent MAY - 3 2010 Planning Director City of Renton REC 1055 South Grady Way ����� Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1, LUA06-147, SHPL-A — Request for Extension Dear Mr. Vincent, On December 16, 2009, Bank of America took ownership of the approved preliminary short plat, Puget Colony Short Plat 1 through the recordation of a Trustee's Deed (20091216000879). Additionally, on January 15, 2010, the Bank quit claimed (201000115000378) the property to Quality Properties Asset Management Company (QPAMC), a branch of Bank of America. Finally, Steiner DOUGLAS was hired as the asset manager for Bank of America and QPAMC. The purpose of this letter is to formally request a two (2) year extension to the approved preliminary short plat, Puget Colony Short Plat 1, per Ordinance No. 5452 and your letter dated June 17, 2009. The Bank is currently working with a local real estate broker to market and sell the asset to a qualified developer who will then take over the entitlements for Puget Colony Short Plat 1. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 949.981.4534 or Ewolf(a7steinerdouglas. com. Sincerely, O't� PiWolf nt Manager cc: Chris Willis, VP Asset Manager, OREO Real Estate Sales, Bank of America 100 West Main Street, Suite 7 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone (714) 231-0704 Fax (714) 368-5998 From: Willis, Chris[mailto:chris.willis@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:41 PM To. DSteiner@Steinerpouglas.com Subject: Authorization Letter To Whom it Concerns: Steiner Douglas has been hired by Bank of America to review property information pertaining to properties commonly known as — Conner— Laurelhurst, Conner Puget Colony. Thank you, Chris Willis Vice President/ Asset Manager Bank of America, N.A. OREO Real Estate Sales 600 Anton, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714.327.4557 Email: chris.willis@bankofamerica.com Property List: www.bankofamerica.reo.com Denis Law uit p, Mayor June 8, 2009 John 5kochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE ste: #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Expiration period for Puget Colony Short Plat 1 City of Renton File LUA06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Skochdopole: ty (0,-- 2�y 'cm pt The City of Renton Council approved the above referenced application on May 14, 2007. This approval is ordinarily good for two (2) year(s). Pursuant to RMC 4-7-050M of the Renton Municipal Code, you may upon written request, prior to the expiration of the project, receive a single one (1)- year extension from the Planning Division. In addition to the above one (1)-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452 (enclosed), has granted an extension of the period of validity on land use and subdivision approvals. Therefore, certain land use and/or subdivision approvals expiring after April 1, 2009, upon written request and prior to the expiration of the project, may receive an additional one-time two (2)-year extension beyond the standard expiration date listed in RMC 4-8 and RMC 4-9. Because your project was initially approved on May 14, 2007, and was valid as of April 1, 2009, you may submit a written request for the standard extension the project would normally receive under RMC 4-7, RMC 4-8, and RMC 4-9, as well as request the additional two (2)-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452. Please be aware that this extension does not apply to temporary use permits, building permits, or public works permits. Also, this provision shall automatically expire on December 31, 2010, and shall be removed from the code at that time unless another ordinance is passed extending this date. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294. Sincerely, C. E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director Enclosure: Copy of Ordinance #5452 cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-147, SHPL-H Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Neil Watts, Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way * Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov r,. City Renton z,,�� C D N N E R seuravF.-a June 16, 2009 C.E. Vincent Planning Director City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 R: Request for Extensions Dear Mr. Vincent, Conner Homes, LLC submits this request for a one year standard extension and the additional two year extension for our Puget Colony Short Plat 1, Renton file LUA06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony Short Plat 2, Renton file LUA06-146, SHPL-H . Thank you for your notice regarding this matter. uonner Homes, LLU 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 425 455 9280 wwwconnerhomes.com Denis Ma oraw Y 4 Cl O ,Cy d � June 17, 2009 Department of Community& Economic Development Gary Upper Conner Homes, LLC 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Puget Colony Short Plat 1 & 2 / City of Renton File LUA06-147 & LUA06-146 Dear Mr. Upper: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Section 4-7-070M of the Renton Municipal Code, relating to short plats, authorizes the City to approve a single one-year extension of the standard two-year expiration. Our records indicate that these projects expired on May 14, 2009, but we understand that you are still working to complete the projects and will require additional time. Therefore, your request for the standard one-year extension is hereby granted for LUA06-146 and LUA06.147. You now have until May 14, 2010 to complete and record these two projects. As stated in my previous correspondence, in addition to the above one-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452 has provided an opportunity for an additional two-year extension. If you still wish to request the additional two-year extension you are required to submit a written request prior to May 14, 2010. I hope this extension meets your needs and that your project can be completed. You may call Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, !F C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-147 & LUA06-146 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Renton City Hall * 1055 South Grady Way + Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov .March 3, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 68 Budget: 2008 Amendment, Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval to amend Benson Hill Communities the 2008 Budget in the amount of $1,189,368 to provide for additional costs Annexation related to serving the Benson Hill Communities Annexation area. Council concur. (See page 69 for ordinance.) Finance: Carry Forward Finance and Information Services Department requested approval of the carry Ordinance forward ordinance in the amount of $31,097,336, which increases the 2008 Budget by carrying forward funds from 2007 for projects that were not completed in 2007. Council concur. (See page 70 for ordinance.) Legal: Parking Sign Legal Division recommended approval to clarify language in City Code Section Regulations 1040-6, Signs And/Or Markings Required, to require parking signs on City streets only for those regulations that are unique to a particular street. Council concur. (See page 70 for ordinance.) Airport: T-Hangar Unit & Tie- Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the following at the Down Space Waiting List Fees airport: a $100 City T-Hangar unit and hangar waiting list fee, and a $25 City tie -down space waiting list fee. Council concur. (See page 69 for resolution.) CAG: 07-044, Phase 11 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an amendment to CAG-07- Municipal Stormwater Permit 044, Phase lI Municipal Stormwater Permit appeal agreement with a coalition Appeal, Interlocal Agreement of government entities to fund legal services, which increases the City's share of the legal services by up to $25,000. Council concur. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Zwicker presented a report Plannine & Development regarding the City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) docket. The Committee Committee recommended that the public hearing set for 3/10/2008 on the Planning: Development proposed helipad and commercial office residential zoning text amendments be Regulations (Title IV) Docket cancelled. The hearing on the helipad amendments will be re -set at a later date Review following completion of an appeal on the issue. The hearing on the commercial office residential amendments will be re -set in combination with other Title IV docket items at a later date. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Latecomer Agreement: Conner Homes, Puget Colony Development, LA-07-002 Utilities Committee Chair Zwicker presented a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to grant preliminary approval of the request for a latecomer agreement from Conner Homes Company, for a period of two years. The application for a latecomer agreement was submitted to recover the $164,905.79 estimated cost for a sewer main extension along SE 2nd PL and SE 2nd St. to serve the proposed Puget Colony Short Plats I and 2 (SHP-06-146 and SHP-06-147). The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the preliminary assessment roll to be forwarded to the City Clerk, who will notify the affected property owners. If no protests are received, after construction of the facilities and approval of the final costs, staff shall present the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council and authorize preparation of the final assessment roll and latecomer agreement. In the event there is a protest for valid cause, a public hearing will be held to resolve any issues prior to proceeding with this matter. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 0`17 COUNCIL Date 3-ydDB . UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 3,-2008 The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in,the staff recommendation to grant preliminary approval of the request for a latecomer agreement from: Conner. Homes Company for a period of two (2) years. Tlie. application for a latecomer's agreement was submitted to recover the $164,905.79 estimated cost for a sewer main extension along SE 2nd Place and SE 2nd Street to serve the proposed Puget Colony Short Plats 1 and 2 (LUA-06-146 and LUA=06- 147). The Committee further recommends that Council authorize the.preliminary assessment roll to be forwarded to the City Clerk, who will notify the affected property owners. If no protests are received, after construction of the facilities and mproval of the final costs, staff shall present the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council and authorize preparation of the final assessment roll and latecomer agreement.In the' event. there Is a. protest for valid cause, a public hearing will be held to.resolve any issues. prior to proceeding with this matter. J Rich Zwick.er, air Greg or, Vice Chair . , Member cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Karen McFarland, Utility System§ Engineering Specialist Michael Dotson, Development Services Engineering Specialist STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L_ Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on April 7, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $67.20. Aarton al Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 9"' day of April, 2007. �tyAtl'�€fdf�f _ CJ • / ,r1ttiSS101V S D Cantelon _ m • _ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Qfg4 kVaslBY P. O. Number: + per'; tIC s z z WA SON rriill101 NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of'Renton City Ball, 105b South Grady Way Renton, NVashington, on April 17, 2007 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: Puget Colony 1 Short Plat Appeal LUA06-147, SHPL-A Location, 5000 Elockof'NE 2nd Street, Description: An appeal of an administrative short plat approval has been filed with the Renton City Clerk. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425430-6515. Published in the Renton Reporter April 7, 2007. #8631"16 Kathy Keolker, Mayor September 12, 2007 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Subject: CITY . Y �V_. Planning/Bui .:ing/Pub11cWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator CITY CLERK CITY OF RENMN SEP 13 2007 CITY CtEERFC S &FICE Please see attached new plats that have just been addressed. PIease add these addresses to your City directories and maps. Amanda Court Short Plat Blakey Townbomes Short Plat Chen Short Plat Garden of Eden LLA Honey Brooke West/Sageerest Plat Langley Ridge Plat Ng Short Plat Rainier Station LLA ncerely, Jan Conklin Energy Plans Examiner Development Services Division Telephone: 425430-7276 #1 :platadd Barbee Mill Plat Bretzke Rogers Lotline adjustment Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 Highlands Park Plat Houvener Short Plat Brewis/Meadow Ave Short Plat Puget Colony I Short Plat Renton Prop Short Plat 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 _ ____ __ \ 2N 1 �r b 4 '34'4 0 ' -------- CD L=�98.48 �� 5000 —_�-- 5''<UNDE.RCRCi461) ELECTRIC `' r EASEMENT TO PUGET SOUND RMEft- -;$ AND LIGHT REC. NO. 6404210 '_ 4 I f Ns Y a9 _ ti L - - i.47 8 9 A K -r r I I I I o oc c r f 'T,O92 z SF. I i �v f r r I I r � �._j I — — — — -- ,s-�, p — _• — — — — I I 55 _ _ --- N88'29'4Z"i�J 183.77 CHIC. (�6,79 PLAT) 74.00 I ai30:t / c 10' D1WNAC' I j� EASEMENT tP4 v q(F5_;'r p CITY 7F RENTON G � * ♦ City Clerk Kathy Keolker, Mayor Bonnie I. Walton May 21, 2007 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NE 1 st Court Renton, WA 98059 . Re: Your.. appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 1/18/20.07, on the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat; File: LUA-067146; and appeal of Administrative Report and Decision dated 1/25/2007, on the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File: LUA-06-147. Dear Appellants: At the regular Council meeting of May 14, 2007, the Renton City Council took action on the referenced appeal by adopting the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee; affirming the decision of the Hearing Examiner- regarding the above referenced matter.. Enclosed is copy of the Planning and Development Committee report as adopted. Unless an appeal of the decision of the City Council is filed with King County Superior Court as indicated in Renton Municipal Code, the decision of the City Council is final. If I can provide further information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �� mil. l�a�.td-,•� Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Enclosure cc: Mayor Kathy Ke.olker Council President Toni Nelson Larry Warren, City Attorney Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Parties of Record (15) 055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 430-6510 / FAX (425) 430-6516 R E 1 V T O N AHEAD 4F THE CURVE. 0 This paper contains 50;b recycled material, 3014 post consumer - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 14, 2007 Ark& 0U'un sy C-77 00UNCIL Date .5--lV 0071 Appeal of PUGET COLONY HOMES I & II File Nos. LUA 06-146 SHPL-H & LUA 06-147 SHPL-A Referred February 26, 2007 & May 7, 2007 Applicant John Skochdopole/Conner Domes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony Homes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the future construction of single family homes. Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A was submitted to the City of Renton's Department of PBPW as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on January 18, 2007. PBPW Administrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on January 25, 2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Planning and Development Committee ("Committee") heard both matters on May 10, 2007. The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2" d Place in Renton, WA. This area was annexed into the City of Renton in December, 2005, with an R8 zoning. In December, 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to an R4. Prior to the R4 zoning taking effect, Applicant Conner Homes vested their plat appliication to the R8 zoning, At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner on January 9, 2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Examiner. The City Staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and therefore, the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus, lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-11OF(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Appeal and the Submissions by the Parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City Staff and argument by attorney for Appellants and attorney for Applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Planning and Development Committee hereby finds and recommends as follows: Appellant's attorney conceded that the Applicant had vested to the R8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. r � Planning and Development C ittee Report Page 2 Therefore, the Committee recommends that the City Council find that the Hearing Examiner did not make any substantial error in fact or law in approving both plat applications. And, the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. Terri Briere, Chair .J r Dan Clawson, Vice Chair areie Palmer, Member cc: Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Lawrence J. Warren R 'Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Lola Archer 4904 NE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke 4914 NE 1" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE 1$` Street Renton, WA 98059 Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Hones 846-108`k' Avenue NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Ann S. Nielsen, Assist City Atty Office of'the City P.O. Box 626 Renton, WA 98058 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75"' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Corey Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-199"' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 J. Scott Ralston Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Can Point Kirkland, WA 98033 Brian Westerbeek P.O. Box 1767 Renton, WA 98057 Dave Jordan 4902 2"d SE Renton, WA 98059 , ichele Fjetland Bob Johns Kayren Kittrick 016 SE 2"d Street 1 b01 114"' S E# 1 l 0 Development Services 1055 S Grad Wa .enton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98004 Y Y Renton, WA 98055 May 14, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 168 SPECIAL PRESENTATION Parks Director Betlach and Transportation Planning and Programming Community Services: Trails Supervisor Seitz reported on the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, a joint and Bicycle Master Plan effort of the Transportation Systems Division and the Parks Division. Mr. Seitz explained that in 2005, State law was amended to include requirements for local governments to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian planning into each comprehensive plan. He noted that Renton is the hub of three major trails: Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop, and Interurban Trail, and that the Transportation Systems Division was awarded a $100,000 federal grant to create a bicycle route map. APPEAL Planning & Development Committee Appeal: Puget Colony Homes 1 & 2 Short Plats, Cook, SHP- 06-146 & SHP-06-147 Ms. Betlach reviewed the goals of the master plan, which include interconnecting neighborhoods and local destinations, creating a safe and convenient network that provides local and regional connectivity, encouraging healthy lifestyles, and encouraging alternate modes of transportation. Mr. Seitz listed the master plan objectives, including identifying local and regional destinations in a trail and bicycle network, inventorying and evaluating existing trails and bicycle routes, identifying connections to major destinations, identifying preferred network of routes, identifying safety issues, developing methodology to prioritize improvements, and ensuring accommodation of a wide variety of users and trip purposes. Continuing, Mr. Seitz and Ms. Betlach reviewed the master plan outcomes and Ms. Betlach reviewed the public outreach plan, which includes public open houses, Council briefings, and meetings with the Renton Non -Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee and the Park Board. Ms. Betlach noted that the final presentation to Council and the adoption of the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is proposed for January 2008. Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report regarding the appeal of the Puget Colony Homes 1 and 2 short plats. Applicant John Skochdopole of Conner Homes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony I Ionics. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, SHP-06-146, was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the future construction of single-family homes. Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, SHP- 06-147, was submitted to City of Renton's Department of Planning./Building/Public. Works as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on 1/18/2007. Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Zimmennan also approved the smaller plat application in his report on 1/25/2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Committee heard both matters on 5/10/2007. The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2nd PI. in Renton. This area was annexed into the City in December 2005, with R-8 zoning. In December 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to R-4. Prior to the R-4 zoning taking effect, applicant Conner Homes vested their plat application to the R-8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner on 1/9/2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Hearing Examiner. City staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and therefore the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The I learing Examiner thus lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. May 14, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 169 Pursuant to City Code 4-8-11017(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and the submissions by the parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City staff and argument by attorney for the appellants and attorney for the applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Committee hereby found and recommended as follows: appellant's attorney conceded that the applicant had vested to the R-8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council find that the Hearing Examiner did not make any substantial error in fact or law in approving both plat applications. The Committee further recommended that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED, ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2007 and beyond. Items noted included: Everyone is invited to a community forum on emergency preparedness presented by the City of Renton on May 22 at the Renton Community Center. Two free natural yard care workshops are going to be held at the Renton Senior Activity Center. The first, "The Good, the Bad, and the Bugly" is on May 17, and the second, "Are Noxious Weeds Growing in Your Backyard" is scheduled for May 24. AUDIENCE COMMENT SandeI DeMastus, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, noted that the political Citizen Comment: DeMastus - campaign season has begun, and she wished all candidates well. She expressed Political Campaigning her hope that candidates will not take each others campaign signs and destroy them. Citizen Comment: Radford - Dean Radford, Editor of the Renton Reporter, 600 Washington Ave. S., Kent, Official Newspaper 98032, spoke on the consent agenda item concerning designation of The Seattle Times as the City's official newspaper. He requested that the matter be referred to the Finance Committee for further review. Mr. Radford noted the commitment the Renton Reporter's news staff has for covering the City and its residents, saying that the coverage is not matched by any other newspaper. He further noted that the newspaper is looking for office space in Renton, and that the Renton Reporter reaches nearly 30,000 households in Renton. Citizen Comment: McOmber - Howard McOmber, 475 Olympia Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, expressed his hope Highlands Area that the ordinances concerning the Highlands area listed on the council meeting Redevelopment, Trails and agenda move forward without any changes, such as to the conforming uses and Bicycle Master Plan not having to demolish anything as long as it is within the standards. He also voiced concern regarding the safety of the trails in the Highlands area, saying he is looking forward to providing input on the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Mr. McOmber recommended the elimination of dark, dangerous trail areas, and the establishment of wheel chair -friendly and mobility scooter -friendly trails. Citizen Comment: Doyle - Charles Doyle, 411 5th Ave. S., Renton, 98057, introduced himself as the Political Campaigning director of the Highlands Community Association's candidate search committee. Mr. Doyle indicated that he has talked to a number of people who are interested PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 14, 2007 Arb'^P.®!l1-:0 BY CCTV COUNCIL Appeal of PUGET COLONY HOMES & II File Nos. LUA 06-146 SHPL-H & LUA 06- SHPL-A Referred February 26, 2007 & May 7, 2007 Applicant John Skochdopole/Conner Domes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony Homes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the future construction of single family homes. Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A was submitted to the City of Renton's Department of PBPW as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his dm ecision on January 18, 2007. PBPWAdministrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on January 25, 20i17. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involvedIidentical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The'Planning and Development Committee ("Committee") heard both matters on May 10, 2007. The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area. in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place in Renton, WA. This area was annexed into the City of Renton in December, 2005, with an R8 zoning. In December, 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area'to an R4. Prior to the R4 zoning taking effect, Applicant Conner Homes vested their plat appli'eation to the R8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner or,January 9, 2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Examiner. The City Staff' investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public='covenant. There.was no. evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and theref6re, the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus, lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-110F(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Appeal and the Submissions by the Parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City Staff and argument by attorney for Appellants and attorney for Applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Planning and Development Committee hereby finds and recommends as follows: Appellant's attorney conceded that the Applicant had vested to the R8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that. the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. May 7, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes _ Page 158 Earthworks, Inc., in the amount of $1,181,670 (budgeted amount $1,150,000). Refer to Utilities Committee for discussion of funding. Vacation: Field Ave NE, ESM City Clerk reported receipt of $6,850 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Consulting Engineers, VAC- Council on 3/ 12/2007, and recommended adoption of the ordinance to finalize 06-004 the ESM Consulting Engineers vacation of a portion of Field Ave. NE, north of NE 2nd St. Council concur. (See page 160 for ordinance.) Appeal: Puget Colony I Short Plat, SHP-06-147 Plat: Kristen Woods, Benson Dr S, FP-06-142 City Clerk reported Hearing Examiner's Stipulation and Order regarding the Puget Colony I and 2 short plats, and reported all parties agreement to the stipulation and order to consolidate the hearings of the appeal of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, SHP-06-146, previously referred to Planning and Development Committee on 2/26/2007, and the appeal of the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat (SHP-06-147). Refer the appeal of the Puget Colony I Short Plat to Planning and Development Committee. Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the Kristen Woods Final Plat; 20 single-family lots on 3.81 acres located at the 3200 block of Benson Dr. S. Council concur. (See page 159 for resolution.) Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Thomas Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way at the corner of Park Ave. N. and N. 34th Dedication, Park Ave N St. to fulfill a requirement of the Thomas Short Plat (SHP-06-089). Council concur. Airport. Northwest Seaplanes Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the Lease, LAG-91-005 airport lease LAG-91-005 with Northwest Seaplanes, Inc. to increase the ground rate from $30,026.95 to $33,633.84 annually, which will remain in effect through 12/31 /201 1 _ Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Plannine & Development regarding the Highlands Subarea zoning and land use changes. The Committee Committee recommended concurrence with the report and recommendations of the Planning: Highlands Area Highlands Zoning Task Force, which propose a series of zoning and land use Redevelopment, Study Area changes in the Highlands Study Area. The Committee further concurred with Zoning & Land Use Changes the two staff recommended changes to the task force's proposal: To keep the task force recommended RM-F (Residential Multi -Family) zoning 1n the Harrington "tail" between NE 7th St. and NE 9th St., but to change the underlying land use designation to CV (Center Village), in compliance with the land use designation policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • To add a note restricting office and conference uses in the CV -zoned property on Edmonds Ave. NE. The Committee further recommended that the ordinances implementing these proposed changes be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED_ (See page 160 for ordinances.) Community Services Community Services Committee Vice Chair Palmer presented a report Committee regarding the Maplewood Golf Course golf cart lease -purchase agreement. The Community Services: Golf Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve a Cart Lease -Purchase formal 48 month lease -purchase agreement with Northwest Yamaha Golf Carts Agreement, Yamaha for 50 gasoline powered golf carts. Fifty carts from the current fleet will be W C. ' OF RENTON COUNCIL AGEND.. LL _%7 A� #: , Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 5/7/2007 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Stipulation and Order Correspondence.. dated 5/1/2007 regarding the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, Ordinance ............. approximately .48 acre, located at 902 Union Ave. NE Resolution............ (File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A) Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: A. Hearing Examiner's Stipulation & Order (5/1/2007) Study Sessions...... B. Hearing Examiner Decision-LUA-06-146 (1 / 18/2007) Information......... C. Administrative Decision-LUA-06-147 (1/26,12007) Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Refer to Planning and Development Committee Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: On February 26, 2007, Council referred to the Planning and Development Committee an appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision for the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, a .79-acre parcel to be subdivided into five lots for single-family homes located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place (SHP-06-146). On January 25, 2007, an Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision was issued for the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, 2 parcels totaling approximately .48-acre, to be subdivided into 3 lots for single-family homes located at 902 Union Ave. NE. (SHP-06-147). On January 26, 2007, Appellants Frank and Karen Cook filed an appeal of both Puget Colony 2 and Puget Colony 1, to the City Council and Hearing Examiner, respectively. On May 1, 2007, the Hearing Examiner held the scheduled hearing on the appeal of Puget Colony 1, the Administrative Decision. The City Attorneys Office and Appellants' Attorney submitted a Stipulation and Order to the Hearing Examiner. No one else appeared for this hearing. The Hearing Examiner reviewed the Stipulation and signed the Order finding that the Puget Colony 1 and 2 Short Plats involve the same applicant, the same appellants and identical factual and legal issues. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner affirmed the Administrative Decision of Puget Colony 1. The Parties stipulated to this appeal hearing in order to consolidate and eliminate the need for redundancy, which would occur if hearings were to be held separately for each Short Plat on essentially the same matter. With Council's approval to Refer to Planning and Development Committee as hereby presented, both matters can be heard and reviewed simultaneously without delay. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A r � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 q . OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A STIPULATION AND ORDER 13 i! THIS MATTER came before Fred J. Kaufrnan, Hearing Examiner, City of 14 Renton, on May 1, 2007. Appellants Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook appeared by 15 and through J. Scott Ralston of the Law Firm Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC, and the City of Renton appeared by and through Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney. 17 Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the following findings 18 of fact and law are hereby entered and it is ORDERED: 19 1. On January 9, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner heard the 20 application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H. At the time of the 21 January 9, 2007 hearing, the undersigned Hearing Examiner fiilly considered all 22 Exhibits entered into the record, the staff report and recommendations, the testimony 23 and arguments of the applicant, and the testimony and arguments of concerned 24 citizens, including Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook; 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER Page l of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425)803-9500 1 11 2. On January 18, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner rendered a 2 jj decision in the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL. H, 3 1 which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference; 4 1 On January- 25, 2007, Gregg A. Zimmerman, the City of Renton 5 11 Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrator, entered an 6 11 Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06- 11 147, SHPL-A.t A copy of said Short PIat Report & Decision is attached hereto as $ 11 Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference; 9 4. On May 1, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner was presented 10 11 with this stipulation regarding the appeal by Appellants Frank and Karen Cook of the 11 „Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06- 12 11147, SHPL-A. The undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered the 13 11 Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision dated January 25, 2007, and all Exhibits 14 11 entered into the record, and the errors raised on appeal by Frank Jay Cook and Karen 15 11 Cook- 16 5. The undersigned Hearing Examiner finds that Puget Colony I Short 17 Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 18 19 2 O The plats are adjacent to each other. [loth plat applications involve the same parties and issues. The plats differ in size. "therefore, under the Renton Municipal Code 4-8-070(H)(l)(m) [5 to 9 lots] Puget Colony 2 Short Plat was presented to the Hearing Examiner, whereas Puget Colony 1 Short Plat determination is made by the City's 21 Administrator per RMC 4-5-070(C)(18) [under 5 lots]. 22 Appellants have appealed both plat applications. Since Puget Colony 2 was heard before the Hearing Examiner, the appeal of this decision is to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-11O(E)(8). Puget Colony 1, the Administrators Decision is appealed to the Hearing Examiner RMC 4-8-110(E)(1 )(a). Given the identical features 23 and issues of both plats, Appellants anticipate that the Hearing Examiner will reach the same result for Puget Colony 1. Appellants would then appeal this result to the City Council. 'Therefore, in an effort to consolidate and 24 eliminate the need for redundancy by having multiple hearings on essentially the same matter, the parties have agreed to this stipulation. This process would now allow the City Council to review both matters, Puget Colony 1 and 2 simultaneously without delay. 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 2 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kir[dand, WA 99033 (425) 903-9500 I involve the same applicant, John Skochdolpole, P.E. on behalf of Conner Homes Co., 2 the same Appellants, Frank and Karen Cook, and identical factual and legal issues. 3 6- Based on this stipulation and review of all the records referenced 4 herein, the undersigned Hearing Examiner concludes that its decision and findings set 5 forth in the January 1 S, 2007, decision regarding Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 46- 6 1146, SHPL-H are similarly applicable to this matter. Therefore, the Findings and 7 Conclusions set forth in Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H attached $ hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. 9 11 7. The Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 10 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A attached hereto as Exhibit 2 approving Puget I I I Colony Short Plat 1 is therefore hereby affirmed. 12 , Fred J. Kauf n ' 14 Hearing Examiner 15 11 City of Renton 16 11 Presented by: 17 is 19 20 Approved for Entry: 21 22 23 24 25 STIML,ATION AND ORDER coiRalst�on,SBANo. 37 4 BRISLAWN LOFTON GREGOREK,PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Attorney for Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook Nielsen, WSBA No. 31425 Assistant City Attorney Office of the City PO Box 626 Renton, WA 95057-0626 Page 3 of 3 Bdrthwn Lofton (keparek, PL.L.0 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425)803-9500 EXHIBIT 1 January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, RE. Conner Homes 846-108ei Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 —198'h Ave SE S'ammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 —75 h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2nd Place , Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded- on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner, The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. I: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat Pile No.: LUA-06-146, SH _.-H January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit NoL, 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Map Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photograph ~� T T Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11: Exhibit No. 13: County Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. I2: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health Department Exhibit No. 15: Title Report for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton_ There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2nd Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new Iots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residential4, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family_ The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The Iots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, Iot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2°d PIace. There are plans by the City to improve NE tad Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2'd Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Pees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdo ole, Conner Homes, 846-108"' Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE 151 Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R-4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R4 zoning designation. Lola Are her, 4904 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Al Dembowski, 4906 NE I" Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Higgins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr_ Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the follm ing conditions be applied: 1. Compliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to tandard conditions of preliminjt_tipproval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS-9600 lot size of plats located in the S-R areas - j,. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 1401h Avenue SE from those lots which a u i . `"ffierre-arrly three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a Ietter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John Skochdo ale stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms�Hi gins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot 1 is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R-4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no less water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m.- FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMF,NDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I . The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a rccluest for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPI.-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #L The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. 11. A tree survey showed 21 significant trees. Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots_ The lots, Proposed Lots I to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted_ 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District_ The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis_ Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed_ The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. The development will increase the demands on the City's-parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. 5. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat, A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division, A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 181` day of January 2007 FRED J. Kk UF HEARING R TRANSMITTED THIS 18d' day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE I $' Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108`4 Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NE 1 s` Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE I" Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE I5f Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198'h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-751h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 18'h day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Larry Rude, Fire Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Transportation Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Utilities Division Jennifer Henning, Development Services Neil Watts, Development Services Stacy `Tucker, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Project Location_ 4900 block of SE 2n0 Place N ti a i WNW �..•.-„-«�„" r ��� 14'7dIHOiIS�(�l�V1WlT3tJd --'- Its H es t! bt P Jac A, la 91 tit s< it e - . a Ila 1fit t _ . gg a Y !I's: -3-N IV lC WOH K'fail 7L,fA�'+ _ I ' a.rw[a7e+ ' moa f , � r , _ ____-r i _ _ ___-1 , r I + I f s I � f --J ------, i i r L--------- R, -----------J --------------- r r I ___________- i { -------7 I r f I i , ! I Lto i�g FBg � > Fn H� 1-3 f f _ { Y = f _ k S I i f f I f s DYKl`PIATT m.aa.. �� .� EXHIBIT 2 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works & DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST. Report Date: January 25, 2007 Project Name Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat Owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846 —1Oe Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact, John Skochdolpole, P. E.; Conner Homes Co.; 425-455-9280 File Number LUA-M-147, SHPL-A Project Manager. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 s€ in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (134), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Conhhued next page Proect Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 � 21tl Project Location Map A*m sne Po-RSOM01.1e7(SP, 3*. R-M.doc City of Renton P/81PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUAD6-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ('yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting I Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7. Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 8: Aerial Photograph Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (dated 12/16/06) C. GENERAL INFORMA 770N: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Conner Homes Company; W —10e Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, INA 98004 2. zoning Designation: Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4- Existing Site Use: Undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East: Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6 Access: The access for the newly formed lots would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE 2nd Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet / 0.48 acre D. H►STORICAUIBACKGROUND. Action land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation NIA 5171 12/05/2005 Comprehensive Plan NIA 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning NIA 5171 12/05I2005 A&nk? Shrt Plt Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8). doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PEAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED 3ANUARY 25, 2007 Page 3 of 11 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1, Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. A King County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stormwater: This site lies within the Maplewood Creek basin. There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets -- General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single-family 2. Community Design Element Admin SW Plf Repod 06-147 (SFR 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton P1WPW De ►tmenf Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUG£T COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT _— — - _ — — _ �LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.__. Project Description/Background Page 4 of 11 The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously farmed, but undeveloped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. in 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (dula). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning_ Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zane. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineatlons. The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and fir trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant." These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platanus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection. An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2"0 Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 sf and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size (sf) Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,912 Lot 3 6.809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2n' Street by private driveways. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Com fiance with ERG Conditions WA AdminShrtPRReport06-7d7(SP.3du R-8).dac „} City of Renton P/81PW De rtment Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA05-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5 of 11 Represenlatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project would provide an additional residentfallot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.28 dwelling units per net acre, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-8 zone. Policy LU-148. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new lots in "established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. The proposed project would develop property that is currently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist_ Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Adm a Sint PJt Report 06-147 (SP, 3du f?-8}.dac City of Renton PJ131PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 6 of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-12. lnfill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal. Policy CD-13. Infll development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements, lnfill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of.entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria., a. Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping., Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a condition of plat approval. Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, all pervious areas, except rear yards, are required to be landscaped and additional trees, both replacement trees and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD,53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights -of -way, storm water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all lots, would be landscaped. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality lnfill development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. Admin Shrt P!t Report 06-147 (SP, 3du,-R-8). diX City of Renton PIWPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CORNER PUGET COLONY I SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Net density is calculated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements. In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (3 / 0,48 = 6.28 du/ac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require all 5 foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage if it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 foot rear yard setback. The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or "protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per tot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2nd Street and of all pervious areas of the residential lots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070). This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved. Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. cJ Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2`4 Street. The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the CiVs street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2.153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blDcks. Lot Standards: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Ali lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The lots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements Into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would meet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Admin Shvl Pit Repod 0& 14 7 (SP, 3du, R-P,doc �. City of Renton P/sIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUAo6-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Page 8 of 11 Access: All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All lots would continue to front on SE 2nd Street. Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately t percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on all sides of the site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2006. Lots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9,940 sf). Lots abutting to the west and adjacent across SE 2n4 Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (10,080 to 10,800 sf). The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The new density of this area would be 4.88 dula, The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 dufa. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cul-de-sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the entire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 55 feet wide at the rear property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots. Lot dimensions can be met by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot width. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street. The houses are set forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards)_ For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are, however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This will have a visual impact on the neighborhood, although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project would meet Comprehensive Plan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods." e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (rimeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to fumish services to the proposed development. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. if the building square footage of the house, including the garage, exceeds 3,600 sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January W, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0,44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based an the student generation factor, the proposed short plat could result in a single now student (0,44 X 3 lots = 1.32) to the local schools. Renton School District has indicated It can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with calculations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordance with the 1990 Bing County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water improvements including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage Improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. The Surface Water System Development Charge Is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. Admin Shrf Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R $),doc • �i City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-14-r, SHPL A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 9 of 11 Water: The King County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1,000 gpm flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat, The Sewer System Development Charge Is $1,017 per new single-family residence- This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.801per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval' for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicants short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning. Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4, the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residential-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential 8 zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R-4); East: Vacant land (zoned R-4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R-4); and West. Residential single family (zoned R-4). T. Setbacks: The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits. 9. Public Utilitifesllmprovements: improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2'a Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. 1. Conclusions: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided alf advisory notes and conditions are complied with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). Admen Shd PR Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).`Joc ;s Ci of Renton PISIPW Department Administrative land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY t SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 10 of 11 3. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state taw provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. 4. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, Fite No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions.- 1 . A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and type of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees). Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2,153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3, A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the finial plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION. - SIGNATURES, Gregg A. ZftilWrmaWIPBI WAdminisrrator TRANSMITTED this 2e day of January, 2007, to the Owner/AppticantlContact: John Skochdolpole, P.E. Conner Homes Company 646 — ioe Ave NE, #202 Bellevue WA 9WO4 TRANSM17 TED this 2e day of January, 2007 to the Parties of Record. Michele Fletland Karen & F-Jay Cook Shannon & Doug Luedtke 5016 SE 2nd Street 4910 NE 1s' Court 4914 SE 2nd Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 TP.4NSMTTED ibis 2e day of January, 2007, to the following: Larry Mteckfing, Building Official tarry Rude, Fxe Marshal NOR Wads, Development Services Director Jennft Henning, Planning Manager Kayren Kittick, Development Engineering supervisor Jan Conklin, Devekoprnent Services Carrie Olson, Devekipment Services Adnriri Sink Prt Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).,d6c " ."i,; i Decision date Brian Westerbeck P.O. Box 1767 Renton WA 98057 City of Renton PfB1PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNEFt PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA46.147, $14PL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 11 of 11 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will became final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision ff material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal fimeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 8, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510_ Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE. The Short flat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M_ ADWSORYNOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are suppfemental information provided in conjunc9on with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. 1. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9.00 a.m. and 8-00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays_ Fire 1. All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. ft., the minimum fire how increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. r-fi7F1 F%rZVMYY — JkVl f1 LIJV11 CR,.- if 0=1 I- A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per sngk,--famly lot is payable prior to final plat recording. Mail r[GYIGW — Ju circa 1. Ali new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. 2. Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. Plan P"%iL uu — _4'rawar This site is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). These fees are $316.80 per new connection. These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,017.00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the final plat. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%_ Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new building foundations_ This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer main. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. n PAvicsw — C.,annrni 1. All required utility, drainage and street Improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs: 4% of anything over $100.000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 3. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. Adnrin Shrt Pll Report 06-147 (SP, 3du. R-8} &=f ,.t'; if- o, IS.E. 131ST ST) S.P_ 88J05 (2) .) col rot AV {31 0 �\ SA 4600 N lm I W 3oa� ' ! 250 0.67 A CO " 250 J ' w LaB A C. a _ So 1� T ' a S. f 4 60LTS 1 696.27] 25 "' a m r N _s 28 r F 1 1 1 r f (591.4 � A A 29 •. n M ¢ 32 r aim a i lall xrYkC ' .i. ddi ? MMA Hof-. + I f I � � I �} ��'w 4`1 �q am oe •a� aPA�� x r • W N � �� mod' aor�x aoravr�awrFrars . , '(`eCJI[C ,._......_.., ...gym [r ....w. y A.a.A wm T! JOW f"IMUNWO • raANMJMY• JV"*Vfreta Wm rloFas1F- HOWAM A► — A.E. Lu S B la q Y �� qR 3FfifiY i i lift t It Sep, 6 r a { rsrrarrrprar QANIIMPUErkTGO[QW5AIGYPlJPL4T1 � - — . V/ES � f q A®Ira szoa PE M NM �f11I J"AW oJ�r 1N07Nft tino - IIAf1MfM6 - svuvs IN6 pp ie �kVi ■ ■ X Y CaE eparrrralMa- E&AAA/NO- srl rtrlw S 0 1 ; 77g00 — -- HOOUtAM ME WE � • § � !| �#■ � § - ,�'���',...� LA k ! 9 | |-hip E | f ! j 2 | ■ oil || 2 | _ � � a�■■ �■ §� � ■ �� � ! I P COiE_ � O Wes_ |�.� �--®.--®.®_ HOQUTAY AVE. N.E. M-rs . i R 11, �q . =41 ti Renton Renton City Limfts Parcels L- SCALE 1 - 1,162 100 0 100 200 FEET htWllren Wm)et-org/MapGuidelmws/Parcel-mwf 300 EXHIBIT 8 Tuesday jabuW23�,200710:45AM a cA =NE CA CA' R--10 E6 • 10 B 1I T23N RMF; 4. 2 R lE1 r,-a R R - Ale NK. 28St. 1._ St T` — -i._. w ' � _ J..a R 4- . SE 22nd PI 447 f CIO =Strm4 st Ikt. i. w ko co SE d w 46 - 22 T23N IM E V2 7ANIN� - - - - *a maw SE 145th P1. SE §31 EXHIBIT L 9 13 T23N ME_ L CIT' OF RENTON #TR♦ kvie Kathy Keolker, Mayor May 3, 2007 Frank and Karen Cook 4910 NE is' Court Renton, WA 98059 Re: Puget Colony Short Plat I Appeal, Stipulation and Order LUA 06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. & Mrs. Cook: Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman Enclosed please find a copy of the Stipulation and Order for the above referenced matter, that was signed by the Hearing Examiner. If this office can provide any further assistance, please address those comments in writing. Sincerely, Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton FKJnt cc: Ann Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Higgins, Development Services Mr. and Mrs. F. J. Cook, Appellants All Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 This papercnntains50% recycledmaterial.30%oosloonsumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A STIPULATION AND ORDER THIS MATTER came before Fred J. Kauffman, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, on May 1, 2007. Appellants Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook appeared by and through J. Scott Ralston of the Law Firm Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC, and the City of Renton appeared by and through Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the following findings of fact and law are hereby entered and it is ORDERED: 1. On January 9, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner heard the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H. At the time of the January 9, 2007 hearing, the undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered all Exhibits entered into the record, the staff report and recommendations, the testimony and arguments of the applicant, and the testimony and arguments of concerned citizens, including Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook; STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 1 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425)803-9500 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. On January 18, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner rendered a decision in the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference; 3. On January 25, 2007, Gregg A. Zimmerman, the City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrator, entered an Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A.1 A copy of said Short Plat Report & Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference; 4. On May 1, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner was presented with this stipulation regarding the appeal by Appellants Frank and Karen Cook of the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A. The undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision dated January 25, 2007, and all Exhibits entered into the record, and the errors raised on appeal by Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook. . 5. The undersigned Hearing Examiner finds that Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H ` The plats are adjacent to each other. Both plat applications involve the same parties and issues. The plats differ in size. Therefore, under the Renton Municipal Code 4-8-070(H)(1)(m) [5 to 9 lots] Puget Colony 2 Short Plat was presented to the Hearing Examiner, whereas Puget Colony 1 Short Plat determination is made by the City's Administrator per RMC 4-8-070(CX19) [under 5 lots]. Appellants have appealed both plat applications. Since Puget Colony 2 was heard before the Hearing Examiner, the appeal of this decision is to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E)(S). Puget Colony 1, the Administrator's Decision is appealed to the Hearing F,xaminer RMC 4-8-110(E)(lxa). Given the identical features and issues of both plats, Appellants anticipate that the Hearing Examiner will reach the same result for Puget Colony 1. Appellants would then appeal this result to the City Council. Therefore, in an effort to consolidate and eliminate the need for redundancy by having multiple hearings on essentially the same matter, the parties have agreed to this stipulation. This process would now allow the City Council to review both matters, Puget Colony 1 and 2 simultaneously without delay. STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 2 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Cregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 803-9500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1s 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I involve the same applicant, John Skochdolpole, P.E. on behalf of Conner Homes Co., the same Appellants, Frank and Karen Cook, and identical factual and legal issues. 6. Based on this stipulation and review of all the records referenced herein, the undersigned Hearing Examiner concludes that its decision and findings set forth in the January 18, 2007, decision regarding Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06- 146, SHPL-H are similarly applicable to this matter. Therefore, the Findings and Conclusions set forth in Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H attached hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. 7. The Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL A attached hereto as Exhibit 2 approving Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is therefore hereby affirmed. Fred J. Kaufin Hearing Examiner City of Renton Presented by: Doff Ralston, WSBA Na. 3 4 BRISLAWN LOFTON GREGOREK, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Attorney for prank Jay Cook and Karen Cook Approved for Entry: rlkl�x . Nielsen, WSBA No. 31425 Assistant City Attorney Office of the City PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057-W26 MPULATlOH AND ORDER BnAiawn LO&M . PLL'C 3450 Cuilllon Point Keiland, WA 98033 (425)SD3-95W Page 3 of 3 0 EXHIBIT 1 January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-1080' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 --198 h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 -75"' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2"d Place , Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded -on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record; Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-14 January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Prelimin y Grading and Utili PIan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Ma Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photo a h Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report_ Exhibit No. 11: Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No. 1.2: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: County Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County De artment of Public Health Department Exhibit No. 15: Title Report for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2°d Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The tots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residential4, however, the Iots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The lots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2' d Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE 2nd Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2n° Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No_: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, 846-108"' Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R-4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R4 zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE 1" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. it seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. A] Dembowski, 4906 NE 1" Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE I` Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Higgins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr. Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January I8, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the follo4ng conditions be applied: 1..0 pliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to tandard conditions of preliminary pproval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the R- lot size o Sf lats located in the S-R areas. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 140'h Avenue SE from those lots which a u i . three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John Skochdo ole stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's_ Ms. Hens defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot 1 is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no less water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m: FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC'), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. IL A tree survey showed 21 significant trees. Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots. The lots, Proposed Lots 1 to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted. 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would-be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: 1. This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed Iots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. I The development will increase the demands on the City's-parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January I8, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 186 day of January 2007 FIZED J. KAUF HEARING E R TRANSMITTED THIS 18" day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE Is' Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108`h Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 ONE 1" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE 15` Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE I` Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198a` Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75'h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 18d` day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writine on or before 5:00 .m. February 1 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An apyeal crust be filed in writing on or before 5:00 .m. February 1 2007. H the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior_to_a_pproval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the Communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. PrejW Loon. 4900 blook of SE 2w Place I Y+�i.a At 9Mert.s/i1 - 9kr•J/ff/'O NJ ��� ........... � r. t t 7al ~ � m fill o§ k s 0 E — 37i '3ilY� ftiYlPlb9�1 T _ _ _ sylcl ifS.ha111 —+a-� - , 1 1 f 1 r --7 , r 1 1 1 f t S 1 • � ' 1 -_--_-.--_-___J ' 1 L--------- , 2 Lq r--------------------- ; nZ rn � 1 1 1 1 / 1 --------` ' 1 1 ; 1 ' 1 1 , 1 1 1 ______ -^J 1 ----------------- ' { 1 f 1 e r 1 , ------------------------- ' ________________- 1 , t------------------------^ --------------�---'-------- 1 — r' 1 -3"5 "3AY HLOiI 1.➢�ff is..:cn,>.. EXHIBIT 2 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works 8c DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SNORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Report Date: January 25, 2007 Prot Name Conner Puget Colony t Shod Plat owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846 — 1080' Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact: John Skochdolpole, P.E.: Conner Homes Co.; 425-455-9280 Fife Number: LUA-06A47, SHPL-A Project Manager. I Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Desc6p0on: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Flat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Continued next page Project Locations: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 Prafect Location Asap AOWO W PW RMat 0644T rsF 3. R-.doc City of Renton P181PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUAW147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Prellminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting f Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7: Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Aerial Photograph Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (dated 12MV06) C. GENERAL INFORMA TYON. 1. Owner(s) of Record: Conner Homes Company, 846 —10e Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 2 Zoning Designation: Residential -- 8 du/ac (R-8) 3. CornpMensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East: Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6. Access: The access for the newly formed lots would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE 2"d Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet 10.48 acre D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Arbon Land Use Fib Ordinance No. Date Annexation NIA 5171 12105f2005 Comprehensive Plan NIA 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning NIA 5171 12MW005 Admin Shd Ptf Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8),doc City of Renton P/WPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECt5rON DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 3 of 11 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. A King County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stormwater: This site lies within the Maplewood Creek basin- There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE; 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020. Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110. Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 44-130. 'free Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets -- General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170. Residential Lots -- General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter S Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element -- Residential Single-family 2. Community Design Element Admiln Shd Pit Report 06-147 (SP, J*, R-8j-doc City of Renton P1"W Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT L.UA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2407 Page 4 of 11 H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Pro ect Description/Background The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously formed, but undeveloped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the jurisdiction of Icing County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended For the future construction of single family residences. In 2005, the property was annexed Into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). In 2006, the City of Renton Initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described In the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and ftr trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant." These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger In diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platanus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection. An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2nd Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 s€ and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size (SO Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,912 _- Lot 3 6,809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2n6 Street by private driveways. 2. - . Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Com liance with ERC Conditions NIA A&Ab Shrt Pit Report 06-147 fSP, 3du,: R-8J• doc • City of Renton P/B/PW De rtment Admints"Ove Land Use Ration CANNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA05-147, SHPL.A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5at11 Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consllstenqy with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Desigrnadon Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, Infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in Quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project wouid provide an additional raesidentiallot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU447, Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.28 dwelling units per net acne, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-6 zone. Policy LU-145. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new lots in "established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutif€zed parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. The proposed project would develop property that is cuurently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist. Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. A&7m Shd Pit Repo►! 06-147 (SP 30u , R-8).doc 44::. City of Renton PIDA11W Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND oECISiON DATED JANUARY 25, 2407 Page 6 of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal. Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and for responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of.entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping: Objective CD-K. Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a condition of plat approvaL Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, aft pervious areas, except rear yarns, are required to be landscaped and additional trees, both replacement trues and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD-53. landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways. street rights -of -way, storm -water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all lots, would be landscaped. h) Compliance with the underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential -- 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone Is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality infll development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. A*nM Shrr Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3&t;-S).doo City of Menton PMPw 2= tonent Admint tMilve Lanai Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT t_UA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Net density is cafeulated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements. In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (3 / 0.48 = 6.28 du/ac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require al 5 foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage if it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 foot rear yard setback. The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or `protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per lot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2"d Street and of all pervious areas of the residential tots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070). This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved. Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 0 Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, induding curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2rd Street. The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. Ali new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the Clty's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2.153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blocks. Lot Standards: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 Zone. The minimum lot size permitted In the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. AN lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The tots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and tot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would meet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Adman Shrf Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R4.doc City of Renton PISIPW Department Adminisftfive Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25. 2Uo7 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries LUAUS-147, SHPL-A Page a of 11 Access. All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All tots would continue to front on BE 2n0 Street Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately 1 percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on all sides of the site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2W6. tots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9,940 sQ. Lots abutting to the west and adjacent across SE 2"4 Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (110,080 to 10,800 sf). The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The now density of this area would be 4.88 dula. The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 dula. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cut -de -sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the entire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 55 feet wide at the rear property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots. Lot dimensiorm can be met by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot wicth. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street The houses are set forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards). For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are. however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This will have a visual impact on the neighborhood. although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project would meet Comprehensive Plan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods." e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage of the house, iricluditg the garage, exceeds 3,600 sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants wtil be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire M %adon Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992). the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling, Based on the student generation factor. Me proposed short plat could result in a single new student (0.44 X 3 lots = 1.32) to the local schools. Renton School District has indicated It can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School. McKnWd Middle School, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with calculations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordanoe with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water Improvements including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway =ssings and any frontage Improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. The Surface Water System Development Charge Is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee Is due with the construction permit Adnrin Shrf PH Report 06-147 (Sf? Jdu, R-4doc ai. City of Renton Pl81Pw Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY i SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL,4 REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2D07 Page 9 of 11 Water: The King County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1,000 gpm flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. The Sewer System Development Charge Is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.80fper unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. !. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4, the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residential-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential 8 zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R-4); East: Vacant land (zoned R-4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R-4); and West: Residential single family (zoned R-4). T. Setbacks. The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits. 9. Public UdiftfesRmproveements: Improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2"d Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be Fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. 1. Conclusions: 1- The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and compiles with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). Adman Slur P$ Report 0& 147 (SP. Mo, R-8y&c =� C df Renton PIWPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUOET COLONY f SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 200T Page io of 14 3. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. The proposed 3 lot short plat Complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and We of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees). Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2,153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3, A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: Gregg A. ilra , P/BrPWIktmkds&vtor TR41VSMITTED this 25' day of Jiarwary, 2007, to the Owner/AmkcanYGontact; John Skochdotpole, P.E. Conner Homes Company 846 —1086' Ave NE, 4202 Bellevue WA 98M TRANSMa7ED this 2e day of January, 2007, to the Parties of Rem d. Michels F)Wand Karen & 1F-.lay Cook Shartnon & Doug Luedtke 5016 SE 2nm Street 4910 NE 1" Court 4914 SE 2"d Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Rerun WA 98d59 773i41VSwnm this 2e slay of January, 2o07, to the foFl4owfng. Lang Mae". Building CGIcial Larry Rude, Fre Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Draebor Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager tCWm Deve"wient Engineering Supervisor Jan CorirNn. Deveioprrrent Services Carrie Qison, Development Services Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8). .y'� . r Dedslon date Brian Westerbeck P.O. Box 1767 Renton WA 98057 City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25. 2007 Page 11 of 11 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fad. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a tomml appeal within the kgowbp appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM an February 8, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110, Additionai information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerks office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short flat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-ON.M. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The fallowing notes are supplernental lnformaWn provided in conjunrton with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal princess for the land use actions. 1. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonrestial construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a-m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shaA be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a_fn_ and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 11- All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. it., the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Dian RPviPw — Rfnrm/Ro jrfnr-a Wnfimr 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per single-family lot is payable prior to firiai plat recording. 1 r( lI r%CV10YV —.?u tMtQ 1. Ail new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. 2. Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. Plan Review -- Sewer 1. This site is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). These fees are $316.80 per new connection. These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,017.00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the final plat. 3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2°%. Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new twtiding foundations. 4_ This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer main. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). 5. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. plan Pavipw — f;anarAl 1. All required utility, drainage and street Improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100.000 of the estimated Construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3°% of anything over $200 000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 3. All plans shall be tied to a minlmum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. Adrm Shrt FW Report 06-147 (SF, 3du, R-8).daft 467A r .� [ � E:. 13 IST ST.) m 0 S-R WOW f1) f2) f�a (a) Q !3 a 30 s.e aeso38 1.38 Ac.MN gilt col M ----- - - 9 9 $ � ESM+L � • o r�l. � f 1 E 3 F 4 5 6 i 8 25 _ rf E La e 1 15 14 i3 tt 11—L t0 9 . ❑ 16 W S 1 Q 9 rt Ar C.r JE) r trr3r� 1 Im IB q 20; 21 22 E3 24 „ t„ �,� 26 t o 31 30 ES 20 27 ffi F 32 � t�Nl• � IJt T ST 1 -so----- �- t 3� 36 37 30 m 29 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 Q w Wjw. . Sri i � � I 30 51 52 53 3"� r: i = 64 63 51 60 a 50 Sr V V me r33M aW Ac. loop @ o i. E rr +x� z a"s 7F" CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 1 FOR C~R MMES - - - -- - - - -- ------ - 1 L+�LMdp 10 7NC 4 --- I •TIO 41b1T II(C. M6 M¢44 I 1 I -, r--------- , { I I I I I ! I 1 4 I I I JN 1 f I 1 1 I I 11 11 II j 11 I lawl Y. I I 1/V1 M 1 f ! I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 ------------------------------ --...--^-_-�_- ---_A ._.._-.---`-----------'� l th el IV f&"PLI, fa.4G ; F-3P'.,At 1C 1* OE —i E��ElIEgT nER Olil 1 1 I l I I I I 1 I I I 1 I $ 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 ------------- w------------- -...-..--------- -------------------- --_ 1 SCAM, V — 20 flJ�TtlS � yl/wller. rrw rr w 1Pw Ai�INF:LMMNLIs+ _ _ -- ���it a�er irinrr�i Im+lr w1061 Qftd w A:l um bT Tf Tv:6 rlaa+eell4 ww awlr eMle r nnM parr lI��1�wr 011awp'lMll��iY�Lr W.tlF W1r >I •YrVY�IR �� wrM i1R wllw.ranrr� "� �1w41wp NNW. MrWA ?gywp Orin. N{41M� wwlwe� I,.Ilr.r om*.' /r..owltro 1 I MISM r�T11ti+RMM1 � r�jp�'NTwI/rM-V[n!1 ♦ r�OyHyr 11l NfwwO.rIM10 *..+11 O PIM,MI� VII/OMOf M t T s #� F1RkP h aq eZ ea iiPIP+T rMATI LQT� w»r,rlr.rMs .+,.,�+..... Oil ` Ima'"9�of$* . f14mome- iYIY�lIM. i 7- r.�:... .. r- .__.......� _ ram 9im;!#�1 Mall I 2 7Qtl. yk :� M ME M. a i C tTl F--1 q� _ r � N �a A Mom F..� ,auwaw,r,�r�rne z9CI,r! zMorM�zz�MO • reaxwn.e • azerlrrrli �f 1 � � / 1 1 ! r 1 ! i 1 r f 1 1 1 1 ! 1 / 1 1 1 1 t i 1 1 r 1 1 , ij1Jlf7 � 1 r , I I ,-,OWM Av- WL •cWolr "�` u..�. .i.lwaril�• .wnr Renton Rwflcm City Lknfts Parcels SCALE 1: 1,162 NOR 100 0 100 300 FEET hWheoAooaeLoroUapGukWmaps/Parcel.mwf N EXHIBIT 8 Tuesday.4964MV23,,2W710:45AM E6 - 10 TZ3N _115EE In GA 10 R-8 R 4 -1 Lt:4— cle R-8 CIS O= U..-4 t _. KR-4 4: cA p 4 R L 4 R-� R-10 CA -G, R; R� R-8 R 4Ar R `- `" R 0 -1 R-4 SE 211d P) T e__ CQ I -SE 139th P � INA Ss Z" SE 142nd St. -4 -04 ai pal I G6 7.2 TZSK RU R 1n SIAM d" UNAW • PAWW TomomAL "avow ow" SE 145th P1. SE EXHIBIT A kmsQiEmm= 1"Em L- 0 T23N ME 19 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 11 2 3i 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A STIPULATION AND ORDER THIS MATTER came before Fred J. Kaufinan, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, on May 1, 2007. Appellants Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook appeared by and through J. Scott Ralston of the Law Firm Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC, and the City of Renton appeared by and through Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the following findings of fact and law are hereby entered and it is ORDERED: 1. On January 9, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner heard the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H. At the time of the January 9, 2007 hearing, the undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered all Exhibits entered into the record, the staff report and recommendations, the testimony and arguments of the applicant, and the testimony and arguments of concerned citizens, including Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook; STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 1 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 903-9500 N. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. On January 18, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner rendered a decision in the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference; 3. On January 25, 2007, Gregg A. Zimmerman, the City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrator, entered an Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A.1 A copy of said Short Plat Report & Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference; 4. On May 1, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner was presented with this stipulation regarding the appeal by Appellants Frank and Karen Cook of the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A. The undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision dated January 25, 2007, and all Exhibits entered into the record, and the errors raised on appeal by Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook. 5. The undersigned Hearing Examiner finds that Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 1 The plats are adjacent to each other. Both plat applications involve the same parties and issues. The plats differ in size. Therefore, under the Renton Municipal Code 4-8-070(H)(1)(m) [5 to 9 lots] Puget Colony 2 Short Plat was presented to the Hearing Examiner, whereas Puget Colony 1 Short Plat determination is made by the City's Administrator per RMC 4-8-070(C)(18) [under 5 lots]. Appellants have appealed both plat applications. Since Puget Colony 2 was heard before the Hearing Examiner, the appeal of this decision is to the Renton City Council_ RMC 4-8-110(E)(8). Puget Colony 1, the Administrator's Decision is appealed to the Hearing Examiner RMC 4-8-110(E)(1)(a). Given the identical features and issues of both plats, Appellants anticipate that the Hearing Examiner will reach the same result for Puget Colony 1. Appellants would then appeal this result to the City Council_ Therefore, in an effort to consolidate and eliminate the need for redundancy by having multiple hearings on essentially the same matter, the parties have agreed to this stipulation. This process would now allow the City Council to review both matters, Puget Colony 1 and 2 simultaneously without delay. STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 2 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 803-9500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 involve the same applicant, Jahn Skochdolpole, P.E. on behalf of Conner Homcs Co., the same Appellants, Frank and Karen Cook, and identical factual and legal issues. 6. Based on this stipulation and review of all the records referenced herein, the undersigned Hearing Examiner concludes that its decision and findings set forth in the .lanuwy 18, 2007, decision regarding Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06- 146, SHPL-H are similarly applicable to this matter. Therefore, the Findings and Conclusions set forth in Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H attached hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. 7. The Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A attached hereto as Exhibit 2 approving Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is therefore hereby affirmed. Fred L Kaufin Hearing Examiner City of Renton Presented by:� cart Ralston, WSBA No. 331 4 BRISLAWN LOFTON GREGOREK,PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Attorney for Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook Approved for Entry: Nielsen, W SBA No. 31425 Assistant City Attorney Office of the City PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057-0626 STIPULATION AND ORDER Rnsb" Lofton Gregorck PLLC 3450 Ca Don Point KirkW4 WA 98033 (425)801-95M Page 3 of 3 ,t EXHIBIT 1 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, P.E_ Conner Homes 846-108`h Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 -198t' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van GeysteI 25507 -75t' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2"4 Place s January 18, 2007 I -fearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded, on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. I- Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminaa Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clcaring Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Ma Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Ma Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photograph Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11. Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No. 12: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: Coun Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No.14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health Department Exhibit No. 15: Title Report for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Hi 'ns, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2"d Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residential4, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function_ The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The lots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2°d Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE 2ad Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2"d Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdo ole, Conner Homes, 846-108"' Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE I' Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R-4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R-4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the RA zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Ai Dembowski, 4906 NE I" Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE I` Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Higgins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr. Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned_ The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the following conditions be applied: 1..0 pliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to tandard conditions of preliminary �proval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS- lot size of plats located in the S-R areas. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 140'h Avenue SE from those lots whit a u i . three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John Skochdopole stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms. Hi gins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot i is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R-4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no less water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m: FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, John Skochdopole, fled a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No- LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #L The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned R4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. 11. A tree survey showed 21 significant trees, Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots. The lots, Proposed Lots 1 to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted_ 15_ The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would-be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. I7. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: 1. This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that snatched the R-8 Zoning, 3. The development will increase the demands on the City's-parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shalt therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. 5. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 18`h day of January 2007 FREE, J. KAUF HEARING EXANVkER TRANSMITTED THIS 18d' day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE I` Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108"' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE 15` Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE 1S` Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198'' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75"' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 18`h day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 104Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be fried in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) cornmunieations may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the Communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. PMiecf Locaffon: 4900 block of SE 24 Place --.--_ annaaarnr-�w.�Mr�a ow.raiKroNa ar.fxn® mr3ra -.. ir9rr lrer sra p.rrww.v.sn.r.n SaMNAIY �••••u� -�ZOiS"� s, rC 4 R a W z U M fit 3'N '31Y' 111vwom rr�� � _ awn kuwmrr _ 'El r b ' ayuw r - 3 r------------------------- ' r r , , , r r, r r 4 L r L--`---�- ------J i r------------------------ rat $ r .. r r L------ -- ---' 2 r---------- W------------, _ vi M ' r r rL_-- _________________J r r , , [Ss' ' L---------- ------------- � r �S ------------ r a �uh i i i i r- '3AY' RIO*L 2 F � n Fq e 9 O W F--f y 3m lM Gi1i!l IING � !lAMMIMO - 1VlYl TIMi EXHIBIT 2 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works �r DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Report Date: January 25, 2007 Project !Name Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat Owner(s): Canner Homes Company; 846--108"' Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact- John Skochdolpole, P.E.; Conner Homes Co_; 425-465-9280 Fr;►e Number- LUA-06-147, SHPL-A J Project Manager. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zane (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Conhinued next page Project Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton. WA 98059 21tl Project Location Map Admvs SW PC Repot Od-147 (SP. 3W. R-BJ cbc City of Renton P18dPW Department Administrative Land Use Anion CONNER PUGET COLONY i SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL,A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit I.- Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting I Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7: Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit S: Aerial Photograph Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (dated 12/16106) C. GENERAL INFORMATION: !. Owner(s) of Record. Conner Homes Company; 846 -108"' Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 2. Zoning Designation: Residential - 8 dulac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics. North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East: Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivislon), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6. Access: The access for the newly formed ions would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE 2nd Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet /0.48 acre D. NISTORICALBACKGROUND: Ac o Land U§Q File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation WA 5171 12105I2005 Comprehensive Plan NIA 5099 11101=04 Zoning WA 5171 12101W005 MY*) Shrf Ph Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-$)•doc City of Renton PISM Department Admlr►istralive Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, 5HPL•A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: Page 3 of 11 1. Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Denton water service area. Water District g0 supplies water service in this area. A King County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stormwater: This site lies within the Maplewood Creek basin. There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070. Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 44-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050' General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120. Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7- Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single-family 2. Community Design Element Admhr Shrf PH Report 06-147 (SR 3du, R-8).doc 2V of Renton PJ&PW Department Administrative Land Use Actlon GONNER PUGET COLONY i SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 4 of i 1 N. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Pro ect Descri Lion/Back round The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously formed, but undeveloped tots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the Jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. In 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (dula). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the properly. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described in the Washington State Wetlands identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The Wetland and Stream Analysis Indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and fir trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant." These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger In diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platenus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection_ An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2nd Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 sf and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size (sf) Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,9112 Lot 3 6,809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2nd Street by private driveways. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions WA Adrnfn Shrl Pit Report 06-147(SP, 3du, R-8).dOc .4'. City of Renton PIBIPW De rtment Administrative Land Use Action CONNt:R PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5 of 11 Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. S. Consistoncy with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, Infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1 j Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project would provide an additional residential lot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.28 dwelling units per net acre, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-8 zone. Policy LU-145. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new lots in -established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values_ The proposed project would develop property that is currently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist. Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Admin Sint PI! Report 06-147(SP, 3Guz44-8).doc ; :. City of Renton P/WPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06447, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 23, 2007 Pages of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal. Policy CD-13. infdl development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and for responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of.entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant WN be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. The following objectives and pollcles from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping: Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a condition of plat approval. Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, all pervious areas, except rear yards, are required to be landscaped and additional trees, both replacement trees and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD-53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights -of -way, storm -water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all tots, would be landscaped. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site Is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality infill development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. Adman Shtt PR Repot 06-147 (SP. 3du;-K-8).dos City of Renton PlBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Net density is calculated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements. In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (310.48 = 6.28 dulac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require a15 foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage if it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 foot rear yard setback. The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or "protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per lot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2i0 Street and of all pervious areas of the residential lots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070)_ This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved_ Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. C) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2`d Street_ The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat most be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system_ In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9,57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blocks. Lot Standards: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. AN lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The lots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would meet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Admit? Sh,f Plf Rqport 06-147 (SP, 3du, Ft�i•doc 4_ . City of Raman PJBfPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONFER PUGET COLONY t SHORT PLAT LUADS-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Pape 8 of 11 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All lots would continue to front on SE 2n° Street. Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately 1 percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on afl sides of Me site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2006. Lots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9,940 so. Lots abutting to the west and adjacent across 5E 20 Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (10,080 to 10,800 so. The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The new density of this area would be 4.88 dula. The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 dula. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cukkd -Sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the entire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 56 Feet wide at the rear property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots. Lot dimensions can be rtmt by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot width. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street The houses are set Forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards). For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are, however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This will have a visual impact on the neighborhood, although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project word meet Comprehensive Plan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock. and new vitality to neighborhoods." e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. Afire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage of the house, including the garage, exceeds 3,600 sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16,1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat could result th a single new student (0.44 X 3 lots = 1.32) to the local schools. Renton School District has indicated it can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle Schad, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with calculations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water improvements Including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage Improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards_ The Surface Water System Development Charge Is $759 per new dwelling uniL This fee is due with the construction permit Adnun Shd Pft Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, f2 Bj:doc . I q�a City of Renton PISIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 9 of 11 Water: The icing County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1.000 gpm Flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.801per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. 1. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request. The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. Z Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4. the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residential-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential a zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval, 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. B Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R-4); East: Vacant land (zoned R4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R-4); and West: Residential single family (zoned R4). 7. Setbacks. The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits, 9. Public U611ties4mprovements: Improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2rd Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. 1. Conclusions: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 ©welling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). AdMh SM P* Report 06-147 (SP, 3db, R-ay*c "-3 RV of Renton PfBfPW De rtment Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY t SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 10 of 11 3. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. 4. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval oontained herein. J. DECISION. The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditlons, 1. A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and type of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees). Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be Indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2.153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: Gregg A.Zfrn rm ,;/B WAdmfMsfrator TRANSMTTED this 2e day of January, 2007, to the Owner/AppkwnVContact: John Skochdolpole, P.E. Canner Homes Company 846—1€18' Ave NE, #202 Bellawe WA 98004 TRANSM MED this 250 day of Jarwary, 2007, to the Parties of Record: Michele Fjetland Karen & F-Jay Cook Stn & Doug Luedlke 5016 SE a Street 4910 NE 1" Court 4914 SE 2°d Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 9809 TRANSARMD this 250 day of January, 2007, to the WxWng. Larry ille(*Mg, auildfrg Otfdal Lary Rude, Fire hUrshal Nei Watts, Development Services Drecior Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Kaymn Mfick, Dwelopment Engineering Supervisor Jan OxMn, Development Services Came Olson, Development Servioes Adman SWI M Report 06-147 (sP, 3du, R-8),&e ' r Decision date Brian Westerbeck P.O. Box 1767 Renton WA M57 City of Renton PIB1PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY f SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25. 2007 Page 11 of 11 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be Fled within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3),, WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fart. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the followiV appeal tirneframe. APPEAL This administrative land use decision will become final If not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 8, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appear process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510, Appeals must be Fled in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunctlan with the adrn€n€strative land use action. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. 1. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Worts on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m_ and 8-00 p.m_ No work shall be permitted on Sundays_ 1. All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. ft., the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Plan Review — StorrnfSurface Water 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per single-family lot is payable prior to final plat recording. Plan Review — Streets 1. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat_ 2_ Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. i- IGI I 1\GYIGW '- a7GYYG1 1. This site is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). These fees are $316.80 per new connection. These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,017.00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the finai plat. 3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new binding foundations. 4. This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer retain. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). 5. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Rion Rpviaw — r,anarml 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100.000 of the estimated construction costs. 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit Is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 3. Ali plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. Admen Shrt Pre Report 06-147(SP, 3du, R-49jdQ%f s. •` ri11 Y JTrO- - , iLiT 3=7 1313T ST.} i3} -: 0.6714cm r R` r�s ar � SP. 88l05 2 (I) (2) (3) (8) S.P. 488038 1.38 Ac N at _ 0 S s iswT.� �u $.1 sicvi I law r6DRT5 6lb2i) t 3 t 4 ZA 25 A 15 14 !3 r2 +a 4. 0 16 AS P -- a dl 0 wav— e 2Q ; 2E 22 P3 24 30 a 2a 27 m t 4 2 ,p 10 34 as 37 30 '1* 40 AIL A*� 29 " i; 47 46 45 49 43 4 41 00 46 *'SE 2 48 w ST" i 50 51 a _ 32 - 6� 62 �� 60 d4 58 Sl a Elm f '�J EXMIT W P a . � to �3 ��► Jun 7-1 11 i 1 f I � 1 1 i 1 f 1 r ' 1 1 1 , 1 1 '-------- r ---------_- 1 , , 1 -- - - - - --, I N _ F-J ip 1 ' i ^? 1 eZ 1 y i y ' e_------------ ' 1 Ici 1 L `-------J 1 la { , Is 1 r 1 1 I r 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 i 1 � ; r ------------------------------�- -fi------------------- , 3M4 ,spa HOOUTAM AWE WE i l pi = j 7q q Is ,Pmr Nrffwrl - ewawre�uo • , w N 191 i a YIr!•11�i4YW �YMwh1YYIw� poll s ..._.. .,g, ISO "I'• MOOIIIAiI AVE NE i �l f--t i0�}OYOw � 011rlL�gti� 11IOI0!lfrMO /ll11KWO - Jtl►Y!1'rMl i HOOIAAM AW- NZ ills s2it! � pit �lw�. IiAMMMI•� /W HNXI# �� --- Rcnton C4 Limits 3 SCALE 1 : 1.162 Renton 100 0 100 200 �300 FEET htt�:,(I arcel.mwF N EXHIBIT f 8 _w TuesdayJanuW 23wM7 10:45 AM E6 - 10 T23N R5E E 1/2 _... _ cA ;'NE CA i R - 8 C N` .- { G A R- 0 i _ 1 W SE d Pl �7 ! T e-- . dco SSE 139th P w w m co S 141st SE 142nd St. F LTI� o C\2 c ti w v� G6 - 22 T23N RM R V2 ZONMG or r"Mm4r OWN" R-4 R-4 R-a :R NR Of tn R _ 4- SE SE SE 145th PI. EXHIBIT 9 15 T23N ME, E 1/2__ /�Y o CITY F RENTON ♦ ♦ Hearing Examiner k: V Kathy Keolker, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman April 12, 2007 J. Scott Ralston Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 Re: Puget Colony Short Plat I Appeal LUA 06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Ralston: We are in receipt of your request for a continuance on the above referenced matter. The appeal hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 1, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. The hearing will take place in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. The address is 1055 S Grady Way in Renton. If this office can provide any further assistance, please address those comments in writing. Sincerely, r Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton FKlnt cc: Ann Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Elizabeth Higgins, Development Services Mr. and Mrs. F. J. Cook, Appellants Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 0 This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30%post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Attorneys & Counselors at Lax April 11, 2007 Fred Kaufinan Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal LUA 06-147, SHPL-A Dear Hearing Examiner Kaufman: Please be advised that his law firm has been retained to represent Frank "Jay" Cook and Karen Cook in reference to the above captioned matter. A hearing on the Cook's appeal is currently scheduled for Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. I am requesting an approximate 2 week continuance, or until as soon thereafter as this matter can be calendared for a continued hearing. I have spoke with Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney, and she does not object to my request for a continuance. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J. Scott Ralston cc : Clients Ann S. Nielsen (via fax (425) 255-5474) 3450 On] �,:l _'�,ii . I,.! klaud. Washington 98033 prli):xi 425 i ()3 9500 I_' 7154 E:MAII. 01ficeCNblgwealtillaw.cum �aw i� pp c y) Kathy Keolker, Mayor 29, 2007 Frank J. Cook 4910 NE ls' Court Renton, WA 98059 Re: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal LUA 06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Cook: CITY JF RENTON Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman The appeal hearing in the above matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. The hearing will take place in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. The address is 1055 S Grady Way in Renton. If this office can provide any further assistance, please address those comments in writing. Sincerely, Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton FK/nt cc: Larry Warren, City Attorney Ann Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Development Services Elizabeth Higgins, Development Services Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper conlains 50 % recycled material, 30% post consumer .IgluamvLj Z% 206 `7 B.4-c(-6,f lP.u� to&z4) ' 4a7C OF RENTON JAN 2 6 2007 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Yl4¢46tJL ad AC;� .Aam-&� nJpt* p imol r, L� ..� .m Olt 9 . Pg , , Boy e (,Ua }� n Cq C I C- U ?`a.,( Coo vcz DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE City of Renton City Treasurer Reg# #/Rcpt#: 001-00060712 [ NJB ] Accounting Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2007 Date/Time: Fri, Jan 26, 2007 12:57 PM 8000/APPEAL FEE LUA-06-147 REF#: FEE AMOUNT: $75.00 ---------------------- Receipt Total = $75.00 Payment Data: Pmt# :1 Payer: F J COOK Method: CC Amount - $75. Receipt Summary Total Tendered = $7 Receipt Total = $7 -------------- Change Due = $ THANK YOU!! DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLIC4. >'. . r• r Ci Renton Department of Planning / Building / 'c Works ENVIRONMENTAL b DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECE APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: lizab th Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike D SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA ross : N/A LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2n0 Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77681 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.28 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts Mare Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoraline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources f� -IV\ , '� "Q C-4- B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housr Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utirrties Transportation Public Services Hrstoric/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inkmai * is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or c— Date CITY OF RENTON February 16, 2007 FEB 19 2007 Renton City Council CITY RECEIV CLER S OFFICE City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 7t' Floor Renton, WA 98055 C 0 N N E R RE: Frank Jay Cook Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision of 1/18/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. (Renton File No. LUA06-146, SHPL-H), and of the Administrative decision on 1/25/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Street. LUA06-147, Dear Distinguished Members of Council, Please consider this correspondence the permitted letter in support of our position, provided for in RMC Section 4-8-110F, on the subject of the referenced filed appeals. Our position is that the decision of the Hearing Examiner should be upheld on LUA06- 146, and that the Administrative decision be upheld on LUA06-147, and the appeal for the reversal of the decision be denied in both cases. The same position applies to both cases. We.want to elaborate on the restriction that Mr. Cook broaches, and that was, in our opinion, not considered in the proper light by the Examiner at the hearing, though handled correctly in the decision. Mr. Cook cites a title report for his property in the same subdivision from baclOn the early 1970's in which a "covenant" was listed as a title exception for Puget Colony properties. This covenant did not and does not exist. His title company was in error, as is supported by the updated title report filed with our short plat application package.. His title company misprinted the wording originally included on the face of the final plat document, and also mislabeied the wording as a covenant instead of a plat restriction. The hearing examiner's report includes the pertinent language. On page 3, paragraph 7, the testimony of Elizabeth Higgins states the entirety of what Mr. Cook's erroneous title report offered, namely (paraphrased here) that" ...no lot... in this plat Shall be divided... whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be.less ` than the area required for the use district stated oh,the plat." And the next paragraph on page 3 then provides the correct wording taken directly o Is N s From the face of the original plat. Namely, (paraphrased), "—no'lot... in this plat shall be divided —whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98044 425 455 9280 www.connerhomes.com The plat restriction, being all that applies, is a standard note widely used in King County in that time period. The restriction simply means that there can be no lot line adjustments or further subdivisions of lots that create ANY parcels smaller than the CURRENT zoning code allows, not the original zoning. This is appreciably different than the non-existent language created by Mr. Cook's title company. As established, the zoning in effect of the time of our application and vesting was R-8, making us consistent with that plat restriction. It is actually a redundant stipulation, in that that premise is anywhere that there is zoning jurisdiction. Be that as it may, it is still there and that is all that it means. Staff took it upon themselves to further investigate the circumstances behind this particular plat note for this particular property and found nothing unique in the County's preliminary plat file for Puget Colony. Ms. H iggi ns' testimony at the Hearing so stated that as well. The examiner mentioned that it is not the City's business to enforce private covenants. That is not the nature of the subject plat restriction. It is not private, but as we have outlined above it is not that the restriction should not apply in this case, it is that it is not a private covenant. It is a plat restriction, a condition for the consummation of the underlying subdivision, and we are in compliance. We broached this subject with Staff prior to making our application and were told the restriction was not prohibiting us from subdivision, given the current zoning. Unfortunately we do not have that communication exchange in writing. The second issue that Mr. Cook raises is easily addressed by a review of the land use file record. It shows that there was a complete application filed in a timely manner so as to vest the application to the R-8 zoning in effect for the property for a period following annexation. Mr. Cook believes that the filing should have included additional studies and materials, but the application did indeed comply with City requirements for completeness. Staff and the Hearing Examiner both also acknowledged and stated that fact. Thank you for your attention. We look forward to the City's decisions on the appeals. Respectfully Submitted, Jo R., Skochdopole, P.E. kNNER HOMES COMPANY Project Manager APPLICANT Y { CIT' OF RENTON Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 12, 2007 John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 LUA06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Skochdopole: PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is sent in response to your email of February 2"d, in which you asked about condition #2 of short plat approval for the Puget Colony Short Plat 1. You are correct, the condition was incorrectly written. It should read, "A Transportation Impact Fee of $75 per average weekday trip attributable to each lot shall be paid prior to recording the Final Plat." The number of trips anticipated from this 3-Iot short plat is 28.71 (9.57 average weekday trips for each lot). The total fee for the short plat would be $2,153.25. 1 apologize for any inconvenience you encountered due to this error. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have further questions. Sincerely, ' ` Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 MThis paper contains 50 % recycled material, 3131! post consumer RENTaN AHEAD OF THE CURVE Y + "R ,7 Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 5, 2007 John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE ste: #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 CITN ]F RENTON If Planning/Buiiding/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator RE: City of Renton's Property Services Comments Puget Colony Short Plat l LUA06-147, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Skochdopole: Please find enclosed comments from the City's Property Services Department. These comments will guide you in the preparation of the short plat when you get to the recording stage. 1f you have any questions feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins Senior Planner cc: Michele Fjetland, Shannon & Doug Luedtke, Brian Westerbeck, Karen & F-Jay Cook / Parties of Record Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 Arm_... RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Art A CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 24, 2007 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Sonja J. Fes ser R SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat I, LUA-06-147-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant rel;ardin(_� the preliminary short submittal: The indexing information (top center of all drawing sheets) is incorrect. Revise and correct as needed - Chicago Title Insurance Company A.L.T.A. Commitment, Order No. 1218798, dated September 26, 2006, notes that Thomas A. Needham and Janis M. Needham, are the vested owners of the subject short plat properties. If Connor Homes Company has since purchased said properties, then a new (or amended) title report is needed. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-06-147-SHPL and LND-20-0476, respectively, on the drawing, preferably in the upper right-hand corner. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (include the city's monument numbers). The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. Note the dates the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. \H AFile Sys\LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Rerurd ALN D-20 - Short Ntats\WMRv070126.doc January 31, 2007 Page 2 Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing, if any. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Note the bearings for all the interior boundary lines of the proposed lots. Note the plat name (can be noted as dashed or other) of the properties to the east, south and west of the subject parcel. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to utilities facilities, topog lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval_ Remove the building setback lines noted on the short plat lots and the setback dimensions noted in the "SITE STATISTICS" block. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove all references to zoning and density from the final short plat submittal. Remove the "OWNER/APPLICANT" and "PLANNER/ENGIlVEER/SURVEYOR" blocks from the final submittal. Change the city street name to HOQUTAM AVE SE. Said street is currently noted as "HOQUI .M AVE NE". The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. Include a declaration block on the drawing. Note that if there are easements, restrictive, covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat will be recorded first (by King County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. HAFile Sys\LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Recordsll.ND-20 - Short Plats10476TV070126.dockor January 31, 2007 Page 3 Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. HAFile Sys1LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying RecurdslLND-20 - Short P1ats104761RV070126.docicor PROPERTY (ICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDMSIO APPLICANT:. cgnLi.l,s )Ft -+4e---,1L4EEr= C_nr-nnr- r JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: PRELIMINARY REVIEW OJP SUBDM ON BY L NG PL T, SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC, FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# G9 ZSW -Q 5,�a a54D 1o. 2006 - RECEIVED FROM (date) !•r WO# l ,T� LND # Pn-a47a NEED MO INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID #'s VICINITY MAP " SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER FRONT FOOTAGE NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developerlowner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construcdon permit is issued to install the on -site and off -site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existanee of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC foes if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The faliowino auoted fees do NOT include insnection fees_ side sewer permits. r/w Dermit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DISTRICT NO. PARCEL NO. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT UNITS ASSESSMENT OR FEE Latecomer Agreement vt) WATER Latecomer Agreement vt WASTEWATER LatecomerAgreement ftLvjt OTHER Assessment District/WATER •g7" itl1 t Special Assessment District[WASTEWATER avo2.-f3lC..80x ULI3 0 Joint Use A Bement O Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Estimated ` Pd Prev. " Partiall Pd_(Ltd Exemption) Never Pd # OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG. SDC FEE S" a family residential $1 956/unit x ~- r Mobile home dwelling unit $I 956/unit *_park Apartment, Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x -=3I • qO Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WASTEWATER " Estimated " Pd Prev. " Par lly Pd Ltd Exemption) - Never Pd IiRge family residential $1,017/unit x 3 3 1.Od Mobile home dwelling unit $I 0171unit x Apartment, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/industrial $0.142/s . ft. of property x(not less than $1,017.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SURFACEWATER - Estimated " Pd Prev. " Partially Pd td Exemption) " Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x zarrloo All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $759.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $7$.Q *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to cbange. Current City SDC fee charges apply to EFFECTIVE January S, 2006 City , tenton Department of Planning / Building / P_ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tro '?f w, COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 200E APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins.- - PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2"d Street WORK ORDER NO: 77681 - SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling .20,613 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.28 dula. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants LandlShoreflne Use Animals Environmental Neagh Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housi Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utdities Transportation Public Services Nistodc/Culturat Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionai information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REPORT City of Renton J Nr Department of Planning / Building / Public Works„ DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Report Date: January 25, 2007 Project Name Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat Owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846 —108tn Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact: John Skochdolpole, P.E.; Conner Homes Co.; 425-455-9280 File Number: LUA-06-147, SHPL-A Project Manager: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner I Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development. The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Continued next page Project Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 bJ Project Location Map Admin SArtPttRepon 06147(SP, 3du, R-8).Wc REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works & DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST.• Report Date: January 25, 2007 Project Name Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846 —108'" Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact: John Skochdolpole, P.E.; Conner Homes Co.; 425-455-9280 File Number: LUA-06-147, SHPL-A Project Manager. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description. The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development. The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Continued next page Project Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 Project Location Map Admin Shrt Prr Report 06-147 (SP, 3du. R-8) dx City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting I Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7: Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 8: Aerial Photograph Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (dated 12/16106) C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Conner Homes Company; 846 —108`h Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East: Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West. Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6. Access: The access for the newly formed lots would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE 2"d Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet / 0.48 acre D. HIS TORICA UBA CKGRO UND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation N/A 5171 12/05/2005 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning NIA 5171 12/05/2005 Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton P1B1PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: Page 3 of 11 1. Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. A King County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stormwater: This site lies within the Maplewood Creek basin. There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single-family 2. Community Design Element Admin Shrt P!t Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Pro ect Description/Background Page 4 of 11 The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously formed, but undeveloped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. In 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (dula). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and fir trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant." These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platanus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection. An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2"d Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 sf and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size (sf) Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,912 Lot 3 6,809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2" d Street by private driveways. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a), 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions NIA Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP 3du, R-8). doc City of Renton PIS/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5of11 Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project would provide an additional residential lot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.28 dwelling units per net acre, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-8 zone. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new lots in "established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. The proposed project would develop property that is currently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist. Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-6).doc City of Renton P1B1PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 6 of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-12. lnfill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal. Policy CD-13. lnfill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. lnfill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Where there are differences in height (e_g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping: Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a condition of plat approval. Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, all pervious areas, except rear yards, are required to be landscaped and additional trees, both replacement trees and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD-53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights -of -way, storm -water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all lots, would be landscaped. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality infill development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton P181PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY i SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Net density is calculated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements. In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (3 / 0.48 = 6.28 du/ac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require al foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage if it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 foot rear yard setback. The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or "protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per lot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2"d Street and of all pervious areas of the residential lots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070). This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved. Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2nd Street. The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. Ail new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blocks. Lot Standards: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. All lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The lots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would meet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Admin Shrt P!t Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Page 8 of 11 Access: All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All lots would continue to front on SE 2"d Street. Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately 1 percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on all sides of the site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2006. Lots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9,940 sf). Lots abutting to the west and adjacent across SE 2Id Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (10,080 to 10,800 sf). The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The new density of this area would be 4.88 dula. The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 dula. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cul-de-sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the entire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 55 feet wide at the rear property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots. Lot dimensions can be met by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot width. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street. The houses are set forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards). For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are, however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This will have a visual impact on the neighborhood, although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project would meet Comprehensive Plan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods." e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage of the house, including the garage, exceeds 3,600 sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992). the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat could result in a single new student (0.44 X 3 lots = 1,32) to the local schools. Renton School District has indicated it can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with calculations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water improvements including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. The Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PISIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 9 of 11 Water: The King County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1,000 gpm flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.80/per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. I. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: i. Request. The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4, the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residential-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential 8 zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R-4); East: Vacant land (zoned R-4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R-4); and West: Residential single family (zoned R-4). 7. Setbacks: The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. s. System Development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits. 9. Public Utilitieslimprovements: Improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2nd Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. I. Conclusions: The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 10 of 11 3. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. 4. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and type of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees), Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2,153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: Gregg A. Iimin�rmart PIBIP W Administrator TRANSMITTED this 2e day of January, 2007, to the Owner/Applicant/Contact. John Skochdolpole, P.E. Conner Homes Company 846 — 1081" Ave NE, #202 Bellevue WA 98004 TRANSMITTED this 25"' day of January, 2007, to the Parties of Record: Michele Fjetland Karen & F-Jay Cook Shannon & Doug Luedtke 501E SE 2"d Street 4910 NE 15' Court 4914 SE 2"d Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 TRANSMITTED this 2e day of January, 2007, to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie Olson, Development Services Z ' Decision date Brian Westerbeck P.O. Box 1767 Renton WA 98057 Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CANNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 11 of 11 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be fled within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 9, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. The following motes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. 1. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 1. All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. ft., the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. r dII r[CVICW—QtUlfI11QU11i A: MOMI 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per single-family lot is payable prior to final plat recording. Clon Paviaw — Cfrootc 1. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. 2. Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. Plan Review — Sewer 1. This site is located in the East Renton interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). These fees are $316.80 per new connection. These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,017-00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the final plat. 3_ Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new building foundations. 4. This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer main. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). 5. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Plan Review — General 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 3. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network_ Admin Shr! Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8) — — (S. E. 131 ST ST) � 30 is-s5 60 S.P. 88105 (I) (2) (3) (4) 01 ,- a zrs ti8 60 4127 30A7 e� �31 E i� r Ac C7p r el xsa say spas LjN S.P. 488038 1.38 A c_ IFI �: mat _ _ 601 1 is c ESI+fT. 3+0 on : IS 1 o S. CP lb 601.75 0 59&27) � M O 2501 .� o = 28 = F [ssi.4) d on e w 29 in � m O (S89T) n a 52 ei a A 13 os� l=l 6p1. S ib OS • IA iA fAt ON INKY74 - ONFOJIMION7 i� .I, I.*Iwlwl�rlul Oyu/ AOM AC{ aw S3%MOfA3MWIAIO� �?A°y ° t _ JffAAVhVO"JP >c i '##bij bi# .. h E . . yy N # @ ��SB``2y 4S �$ 3� M 44 s tl pop v■■ - -�F " s ma� .-ne6 wry n1 I Sk Y�W4! � 2 Y�wy! jww I — VRIRNN _*n715,8 LOON f6- ZS J� fI-- —---__---_._ _— 11------...____ ------------- -- -� -__--------------------_--__-------------------__- L I I w rr � I Iw ; — � � p 4U �1 ifSAl•�1' ' I' I I I � � + IIlI � '�• ~� • + �r 'emu ' I a I 1 J� �I j I r• I I �� I I N l i m d 1 I I I I - I 1 I If T I 1 I r I ! ! 1 A/Zy + w � 1 i s ��i1hA1[QY I l I ! I I In 1 I I I 1 p I m s4 --- AJAIAI •ONINNYII 7NfaaaNl'J Ma - - Pam MV3 nf90 a>Ew•w+w wxaee ' ZATzaTS IN WY 3d k lA7Wl1' .. N'31"NOM NW INWHmnewn �I A0C/rO C1I I Q I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 Ir I I I 1 i I I I r r 1 I f 1 I I I 1 I CI 3'N '3AV WVU}OOH 3,1S,9 LWM t6-iM T C5'191 _� I �_ I I IR I -----------------_---_____ti---_-_-------- I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 r I I 1 r I 1 I I 1 { f I 1 I I I I f 1 1 I I I rl I 1 r I I a^ I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 L-------- I } I 0 I I 1 I I I I I I I l W LO'U9L R - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - I I 1 I I Ir I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I r I I t I I I i I I I i I I I i I I 1 I I I I I s @lf fl lA!@f -@kINMYi� -'JXI�ii M!'J lfl 1mfG mu9wdw. 2xnm =,Tm '371 AW m �w�v+r cwtwnn N�JfS+=r/�� YMQI gym ` ., b meµ„ Ni 3'N '3nV MVJnOOH SG-141 � IO'09i 1 to I I 1 I f I I I I 1 , I i I r 1 I I 1 1 f I 1 r 1 I i I 1 1 �AOf---- 'MI/l�l./ PYIMY M]� Pkl! PMl ZW}-�EEM'33� awim �MISICIY rlw W��w � �.•... T1Y�1LI�1f15.(Md.__ Ld8OAN4ft� �r RI /��IWIllmsiiWY/ Yi i'3'N -3nv wvinOOH I a Renton Renton City Limits I I Parcels SCALE 1 :1,162 100 0 100 200 300 FEET http://rentortnet.org/MapGuidelmaps/Parcel.mwf EXHIBIT 8 Tuesday, January 23,.2007 10:45 AM sz SE 142nd St. NE 3rd S :., , _ R R-4 �B. :.,f4 _. -R_4 ct Or R 4YR E2aCt =( htT e-- N SE 139th Pco I w L b " 1 r, nz cY'j GG - 22 T23N M E I/2 ZONING - - - - F4nt4M (a TAMI P/wrw agcmgm" =VIC s SE SEI co SE 145th ft EXHIBIT o 9 19 T23N R5E E 1/2 1 z,GL�y LV N a& -I ( for e7& - i ? December 19, 2006 To: The Mayor of Renton Cc: Senior Planner From: Richard Galusha 19689 7`h Ave. N.E. #308 Poulsbo, WA 98370 Subject: Disappointment Folks, I have been trying and working to get sewers on our property on 2" a Ave. (Puget Colony Homes) for over twenty years (20). It is finally going to happen after going to countless meetings and talking with your folks on the phones and numerous emails over that period of time.. (Because we live out of the area going to all the meetings was tough but we made most all of them). When we went into the City the area was zoned R8. Somehow this got changed back to R4, (we could not make that meeting). However, l was very surprised to learn that Connor Homes got some short -plats in and he will get the R8 zoning because there was a period of time that allowed this before it became R4. My disappointment is that as long as I have communicated with the City ,and several of your folks where aware that we wanted very much to short-pIat our property. We where never informed there was a period of time between the R8 and R4 zoning where a person could put in the short -plat. The only notification we received was that the zoning had been changed. This has really hurt us , is there any chance of getting a variance? We will have Connor Home short -plats beside us and behind us. Prior to us not being informed of this period between the R8 and R4 zoning we have had an excellent relationship with the City and look forward to continue that relationship. 360-821-9623 PLANNINGBUILDING/ 10, + + PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �c�.T�O M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 18, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Mike Dotson_/ SUBJECT: Puget ColonyShortPlat 1 and 2, LUA06-146 and 147, SHPL-H The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject projects. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER- The subject site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. SEWER -There are no sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sewer lift station under construction approximately 200-feet to the east of this site. STORM -There exist drainage ditches in this area. The site is within the Maplewood Creek Drainage basin. STREET -There is currently no a paved public right-of-way adjacent to the sites. However there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters or sidewalks. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A certificate of water availability will be required from Water District 90 prior to recording of the short plat. The certificate must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300-feet and 1000 gpm flow). SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. The sewer main must be extended to the extreme boundaries of the plat. Each new lot will require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the short plats 3. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.80/per unit is due at the time a construction permit is issued. H:1Division. slDevelop. ser\Dev&plan.ing\P ROJECTS106-147_ El izabethlpuget colony GF.doc Page 2 of 2 SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. 2. A drainage report was submitted and accepted. In accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water design manual, per code, the report submitted showed that these projects are below the thresholds for both water quality and detention requirements. Therefore these projects are exempt from detention and water quality. All other surface water improvements including, but not limited to: conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. TRANSPORTATION I . The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips (S x 9.57 trips x $75/trip = $5,742.00). This fee is required prior to recording the short plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. 3. Per City of Renton code these projects are required to install curb, gutter, streetlights (for Short Plat 2 only) and sidewalks, along the frontage of the parcels being developed. Note: The design plans submitted with the Land Use review did not include the required frontage improvements. These improvements are a code requirement of the short plat. Or, as an alternative, the applicant may apply to pay a "fee -in -lieu" of installation. CONDITIONS 1, Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. The total for both short plats ($ new single-family lots) is $5,742.00. Cc: Kayren Kittrick h:%division.sldevelop.Berldcv&plan.inglprojccts\06-147.eIizabethlpuget colony gf.doc City _...enton Department of Planning / Building / Pu ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICA Works TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f i ci•,s V r• CeJi'o I i COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes GI I V U1. FiENfQN PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION. 5000 Block of SE 2mi Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77681 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.28 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources 1 � l V" `ram S ifi � %.�-� f B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this areas where additional Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Ugh r4g Recrealion utilities Trans anon Public Services Hislonc/Culturat Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or is r}eeded to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director br-Authorized Representative /2 /fir -o-6 Date s# 7 33 anon 01"N' Project Name: Project Address: ,5'1: �:lF:�- Z _ Contact Person: CONWkyi�v►,._ __ Permit Number: _ WA U -I Project Description: S `. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: Residential ff ITE Trip Generation Manual, 70 Edition ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Non --retail 0 Others -Transportation h [:alcula'ted'by: S# 7 33 Y4iilk hA Project Name: P I Project Address: S T>,wC IL- Contact Person: Co N"v kv [ • Permit Number: - LUP� Okv14-7 Project Description: _. - � y�� S, - u -- — f Land Use Type: Method of Calculation.: 0 Residential Jj- ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7t' Edition ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail ❑ Other : ransportatlon ..Mitlgatlon._Fie:- Cafcuiated by: - — - �.. City , enton Department of Planning / Building /P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r ; r c Tic' vrn f ::. COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO. LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2nd Street WORK ORDER NO: 77681 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The or000sed density would be 6.28 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants Land/Shorefine Use Animals Environmental Heeith Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Ma/or impacts Mona Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics L g ht/Glare Recreation Utrlrtres Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet- 14, 000 Feet L j DEC - 5 2006 L--�� b/' b 41 P4 S 441,6 /Cl' We have reviewed this applicationAith particular attention to those areas in whith we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add' 'onal information! isillneeded to orooerly assess this nrobosal. Signature of Di/ebtor or is tom2 ' Date FIRE DEPARTMENT +� }*� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 6, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat, 5000 Blk SE 142°1 St SE MITIGATION ITEMS: 1. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to a minimum of 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. 3. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i Apugetcolonysperc.doc City . enfon Department of Planning / Building / P _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .71"' '? , V i COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 Off V OF APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson ; DE SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2ntl Street BUILDING DTVFSTW WORK ORDER NO: 77681 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The or000sed densitv would be 6.28 dula. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT fe.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoretrne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy{ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utitrtres Transportation Public Services Histortocultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14, WO Feet We have reviewed s iication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad anal i rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. of Director or Authorized Representative Date City c„ ..enton Department of Planning / Building / Pi ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICA Works TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T"ar (C� COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2"d Street WORK ORDER NO: 77681 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.28 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health €nerWyl Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities TramsjpWalion Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet d", ,, /" 6 le�op B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS 4"_' 6 9)6 C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information ls^eded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e City `enton Department of Planning / Building /P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: [Onsll',1-, 0. ,- ; v sCOMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-147, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED. DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 20,813 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2no Street WORK ORDER NO: 77681 f . 5 20M SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL. The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant pawk�t � d� square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential- The Comprehensive an a designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.28 du/a. w A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Nan -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Elementofthe Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet t4 W0 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whewadditional informati�n is needed to property assess this proposal. of Date tir} O NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Mader Applicallon has been filed and accepted with the Development Samices Divisl in orlhe City of Renton The fallowing til ly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAMEMUMBER: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 f LUAW147. SHPL-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for this land use action has requesled subtlivlsian of two v rl parreta, totaling 20.813 square feel, into three parcels mat would he suitable for development of single family msderriol. The Comprehensive Plan land use designalion 1s Single Family Residential and the ounent zoning is Residential 9. which 210we a dweling units per net acre dula_ The proposed density would be 0.2a 0ura. PROJECT LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2 ° Slreel PUBLIC APPROVALS: AdmInisfi live Short I'll approval APPLICANTlPROJECT CONTACT PERSON John Skn hdopole, Canner Homes; Tel (425) 455-9280 Corntkerds on the above application most be submitted in writing to Elizabeth 1-1199lne, Senior Planner, Development Sarvicea Division, 1065 South Grady Way, Renton, WA fled, by 6:00 PM on December 19. 2004k h you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of fecurd and receive additional notification by mail, caMad the Project Manager at (425) 430-7382 Anyune who submits wnnen cammmrds wll automa "Ily become a party of record and will be notified of any decislen on Ihis piujecl. DATE OF APPLICATION; November 29, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 If you would Skelo be made a party of recwd to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renlon, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA U055. File Name i No.: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 ; LUA06-147, SHPL-A NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I, 5�-7,,yr 6;;Fy,g� _ _, hereby certify that -5 copies of the above doc were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places or nearby the described property. DATE: IZ 4-av SIGNED - ATTEST; Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing -,on the ( P h day o ^ , -A V CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 51h day of December, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing John Skochdopole Applicant/Contact (Signature of Sender)_ STATE OF WASHINGTON } " SS COUNTY OF KING } l certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be histher/their free and voluntary ac�t,f� purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Notary (Print): C L My appointment expires: 7.�<<- C; Project Name: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Project Number:. LUA06-147, SHPL-A -I x '0 , A.9j- �-- lic in arfflor the Stite OfWashingt and . , t w 692800038006 692800041000 CADWELL JESSICA L COUGHLIN MICHAEL J+SHIRLEYA 14111 SE 134TH ST 14126 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 692800052007 692800040002 GALUSHA DICK & ELAINE GLANDON THEODORE F+BEVERLY 1051 SHINE RD 13405 142ND AVE SE PORT LUDLOW WA 98365 RENTON WA 98059 692800060000 692800046009 KAPELKA BENJAMIN LUEDTKE DOUGLAS E+SHANNON M 14100 SE 136TH ST 14018 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 692800055000 692800039004 NEEDHAM THOMAS PELTON THOMAS C 13325 156TH AVE SE 5015 NE 1ST ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 692800043006 692800058004 RANDALL STEVEN A+KELLY L SMITH ELEXA LEE 14112 SE 135TH ST 14105 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 692800037008 692800063004 TRAN TAN VANGEYSTELROBERT+CHERYL 660 SW 132ND ST 25507 75TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98146 VASHON WA 98070 692800042008 FJETLAND WILLIAM K+MICHELLE 14118 SOUTHEAST 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 692800053005 HAUGEN CHRISTOPHER A 14105 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 692800059002 MOREILLON DAN R+JANA 14110 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98058 692800045001 PUHRMANN JAMES D+ALEXANDER JANINE B 14026 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059-4932 692800050001 SPENCER RICHARD+PAMELA 14013 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 692800044004 WELCH JASON S+VICTORIA J 14106 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 1 LUA06-147, SHPL-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of two vacant parcels, totaling 20,813 square feet, into three parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.28 dula. PROJECT LOCATION: 5000 Block of SE 2r° Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Short Plat approval APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: John Skochdopole, Conner Homes; Tel: (425) 455-9280 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on December 19, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7382. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: November 29, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96055. File Name 1 No.: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 1 LUA06-147. SHPL-A MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 5, 2006 John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108Ih Avenue NE #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 LUA06-147, SHPI_-A Dear Mr. Skochdopole: CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/PubficWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper cc:ntains recyced material. 30%post consumer RENTQN AHEAD OF THE CURVE U Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 5, 2006 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 4a' Street .. Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Puget Colony. Short Plat 1 LLIA06-147, SHPL-A CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for a 3-lot single- family subdivision located at 5000 Block of SE 2" d Street. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application., the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by December 19, 2006. Elementary School: Middle School: High School. Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes` No Any Comments: Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP DEC $ Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 RE N T N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer dAn(.-" I (-Il City of Renton LAND USE PERM IT""" ""I 'IS -to MASTER APPLICATIONa6�ENEv PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Conner Homes Company ADDRE55: 846 108`h Ave NE #202 CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-455-9280 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Jahn Skochdolpole, P.E. COMPANY (if applicable): Conner Homes ADDRESS: 846 108'h Ave. NE #202 CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425455-9280 CONTACT PERSON NAME: SAME AS APPLICANT COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 5000 block of SE 2nd Street Renton - 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 6928000540 6928000550 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family Residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NIA EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 20,813 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 6.278 DU/AC NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 3 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 3 Q; weblpw/devserv/fomis/planning/masterapp.doc 1 11115/06 PR ECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approx. 3,000 S.F. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): nla TION contil dd PROJECT VALUE: $750,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE * AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 15 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Short Plat 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) Joky R. S oc-4cAp jo (c— , declare that l am (please check one) ^ the current owner of the property involved in this application or V the authorized represe htative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best orrf-- my knowledge and belief_ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 3ry .Skoc4 ��Ue signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voltftary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Sig t e of OwnerlRep sentative) (Signature of OwnedRepresentative) Q;web/pw/devserv/fomnslplanning/masterapp.doc Notary Public in and for a State of Washington = �� Notary(Print)PLA FNTn My appointment expires: NOV 2 9 2006 2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVErx OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRr-MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by.- 1 . Property Services Section PROJECT NAME:i`h i' _ .s_ ' 7 �- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section ©ATE: ?%12, +�`' � pE� LpPMENT PLANNING 4. Development Planning Section CITY OF RFNTGN Nov 2 9 2006 Q:\VVEBIPWIDEVSERV\Forms%Planninglwaiverofsubmittairegs_8-06.xls 0=6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO. WAIVtr% OF SUBMITTAL REQUInciMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS pm '':�' 'fi -'.}•�'''kC}`yYf• v ::;�r:;,,;:h :o-w:i-::.5ito�yr';•j'',-; ::v. rc'r .3Ati:F v% a.. .a ^•,k '"}Er• '� } x^-` -vK:e � ^-iY^: h`- {R^'.^'.. n �ri } . Y �{y.iM � f �� ,Mk. Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 ly:;.v.:�q�.:q..v}v.:_ v:}} }Y; ........ .- - ..� yqp � _ Y mw.{r.:. : ;v:q }_.y .•�[y Plat Name Reservation 4 `Y�'A}#' ''4W."� 3r�,'• � J:'ri:,M1.'p:.v: - < - . ti:' • �, vYC: ME Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 n. . :. rv• .. .f .. • F : .l' Rehabilitation Plan a Site Plan 2AND 4 ' }.f,n' :..Y.•.?`:`.YS.; :.. v •y:^irk:: ry;txMr:'-:.""::'i;:: ..;..:.: .'-'.: ,-f..fn. '}%1-'. h;•4-RI. ..,rf. x-.�.;f' ,. 'rfN'`'ric.::.rS,.,.:..... '; ::f`. r:ti:::--n--•e`�''5:.nr`. vY ..�, y,:y'�S.�.a,.,rNt s '°at ..r. cH,v'<-'.:;, Sr,,•.. Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental a ON Street Profiles 2 :.. Topography Map 3 ri: ^-".. '1�r" .. S'r'::y:, v::•`� � ...Y... : • .: ..M1 v} f 9 -;:L ^F:""^...:.. v .. .. IN t Y. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 ��...: �.A: }{ ..-J .yid 1�. .. MJSSu•'if �-Rf - irk-vJ;:^YvS'- '• �'C�,'.`%�p-�{i:.. : - - .'-'.}.'.�,.v`:. .. .fi`Rr.'.-':.. .. - .. N:xyY xv:J.:e l'�n-0+ +x�•v-]C:•.:�•..`...- '-0J. .{�4�5:[w� `:}'`.F 'i'9��' Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 }[� �{- 11 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary a .. y. " _ ..- .- , , . .:...:. r :-ti.r-.�'•ai.w:c ' .. i. .....6:.. �. f:. : 'ao-x• Sx:%f;:� rff,wh •.fr }''``kri•;,.,..,. f ,:}w};�„ti?y:,^S�}r:r'-av �h Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND 3 � This requirement may be waived by: 1 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: If' L� L Lu r� S -p-l- T 42L -T'S 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: !' 4. Development Planning Section Q:IWEBV WIDEVSERVIFomis%Planninglwaiverofsubmittalregs_M6.xis 09/06 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. _20,813 square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets"* Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 0 square feet 0 square feet 0 square feet 2. 0 square feet 3. 20,813 square feet 4. .47 acres 5. 3 units/lots 6. 6.38 = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deductedlexcluded. * DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. CITY OF RENTON Nov 2 9 2006 RECEIVED NA20061061240ocs106124 DensityWorksheet _ PugetColonyl .doc 1 Last updated imm"'s CORE DESIGN • Project Name: • Project Size: • Location of Site: • Parcel Numbers: Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E.29thP)ace, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 %~W. coredesigninc. com Project Narrative Puget Colony Short Plat -- Renton, Washington Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 The total site is approximately .47 acres. The project is located along 5000 block of SE 2 d Street. Please see the neighborhood detail map for the specific location. 6929000540 and 6928000550 • Current zoning: R-8 Residential 8 du/ac Surrounding zoning: North: (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac South: (R-4) Unicorporated King County West: (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac East: (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac • Current use: The site currcntly is currently vacant. • Soil type and Drainage: 1,�,-ing Counn- Sails Report the site is entirely underlain by Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. Drainage will be provided by the existing storm drainage casements located at the rear of the 3 lots. • Proposed property use: The proposal is to subdivide the property into 3 single-family detached, fee simple, lots. • .Access: The project is proposed to gain access from SE 2"' Street. • Off -site improvements: None proposed at this time, an in -lieu fee will be paid for frontage improvements. • Est. Construction Costs: $ 1,050,000 • Est. fair market value: $ 1,800,00() • Quantity and type of fill: At this point in the design process, the site is anticipated to be balanced by cutting and filling. If it is discovered that the site will need fill material, the applicant will submit a fill source statement at that tune_ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • Trees to be removed: Efforts will. be made to retain trees in the rear of the lots. CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2006 RECEI � ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVE • Land dedication: N/A Number, size, and density of lots: There arc 3 lots proposed for each short plat. The average lot size is approximately- 6,937 S.F. The net density is approximately 6.38 du/ac. • Proposed job shacks: The site may have a construction trailer during the construction of the development. Modifications: N/A DEVELOPMENT PLANNING pF RFNTON NOV 2 9 zoos Pre -application meeting for the Puget Colony Short Plats Hoquiam Ave SE and SE 2nd St and SE 2nd pl PRE06-127 City of Renton Development Services Division November 9, 2006 Contact information Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP, (425) 430-7382 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Mike Dotson, (425) 430-7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: James Gray (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non -binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED, Y 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT M E M 0 R A N D U M DATE: October 26, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal-� SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat, 5000 Blk S 142nd St. SE Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RFNTON Nov 2 9 2006 RECEIVED i:lpacificcolonysp.doc O PLANNING/BUILDING/ + + PUBLIC WORDS DEPARTMENT �'1vTQ M E M Q R A N D U M To: Elizabeth Higgins From: Mike Dotson Date: November 6, 2006 Subject: PreApglication Review Comments PREAPP No. 06-127 Puget Colony Short Plat NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the information provided in the preliminary application for this proposed short plat. The following comments assume the property is annexed to the City of Renton. WATER 1. The proposed development is within the water service area of Water District 90 (WD 90, phone number 425-255-9600). The applicant will be required to obtain a certificate of water availability from the District and provide it to the City prior to the approval of the short plat. A fire flow analyses will be required to verify that the District's system can provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm of available fire flow. Results of flow analysis shall be submitted to the City along with the certificate of water availability to ensure that adequate flow rate and pressure is available to serve the development. SANITARY SEWER 1. A City of Renton sewer main is permitted to be constructed approximately 200-400 feet to the east of this property. A sewer main extension to connect these properties will be required prior to recording a short plat. 2. This parcel is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD = $224.52 + interest per lot). Fees are collected at the time the utility construction permit is issued. 3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $1,017 per lot. SURFACE WATER The project is required to do a drainage analysis and meet the design criteria in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (unless the analysis shows that detention is required). 2. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is $759 per building&Nt�1�s�l p� PUNNING payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. U1TY O 'ft &TON Nov 2 9 2W6 iaplan revieMplan review 20061puget colony sp pre-app.doc RECEIVED Page 2 of 2 11/09/2006 TRANSPORTATION I. City Code requires street improvements, which include: paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drainage and landscape will be required along the street frontage. 2. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Ordinance. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost of construction estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but Iess than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 3. If you have any questions please call me at 425430-7304. CC: Kayren Kinrick LVELO?MElttr ALANMING ' JTY OF AFNTON NOV z 9 2W6 iaplan reviewlplan review 20061puget colony sp pre-app.doc NECEIVED CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: September 14, 2006 TO: Pre -Application File No. PRE06-104 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425) 430-7382 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plats, iloquiam Ave SE and SE 2"d St and SE 2"d Pl General: We have completed a preliminary review of the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall and are available on the City of Renton website (www.renton.ci.wams). Project Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 4 existing lots into 6 lots suitable for development. The lots are in two discontinuous pairs (see zoning map). The properties are located at the 4000-5000 blocks of SE 2nd Street and SE 2nd Place west of where these roads intersect with Hoquiam Avenue SE. The subdivided lots on SE 2nd St would average 6,937 sf and on SE 2nd P1 would average 8,015 sf. Current Use: The properties are currently undeveloped, but within a previous subdivision that has some single-family development. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: The property is located within the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. There is, however, a redesignation currently being processed by the City of Renton, the area of which includes the proposed subdivisions. The new designation would be Residential Low Density. The redesignation has been approved by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee and Planning and Development Committee and is scheduled to be approved by the City Council on December 51h. Because the redesignation has not been approved as of this date however, development information for both Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density Comprehensive Plan land use designations are included in this report. _ t °V�LOPMi=NT F �+7 Y of RF:N TQn�rnr� NOV 2 9 cos ll:\Division.slDevelop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\ERH\Preappiication mports12006 Preapplicadons\06-127 Puget Colony (R8, two 3-lot SFR).d0c E1VEL) Puget Colony Short Plats PreappliL n Meeting November 9, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Zoning: The property is currently zoned Residential 8 (R-8). The proposed zoning would be Residential 4 (114). Single-family residential is the primary use in both of these zones. Development of one detached, single-family residence on each lot is allowed. Environmental Review: Subdivision of land into nine or fewer lots or tracts is exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review, unless critical areas are known to be on or near the site. There is a possibility both wetlands and moderately steep slopes (up to 25 percent) on one or more of these properties. Due to these factors, a geotechnical report may be required at the time building permits are requested. No environmental review would be required at the time of subdivision however. Density: The density range in the R-8 zone is between a minimum of 4 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) and 8 du/a. The allowed density in the R4 zone is up to 4 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). The density of the SE 2"d Street short plat would be 6.27 du/a and the density of the SE 2"d Place would be 5.43, These densities would be allowed within the R-8 zone, but would be over the allowed density in the R-4 zone. Critical Areas: As stated above, the site may have critical areas present. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether critical areas will impact the proposed development. Development Standards: RMC 4-2-110A, "Development Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" apply to new development on the site. A copy of these standards is being provided at the pre -application meeting. Lot size and dimensions —The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf for parcels less than one acre in size prior to subdivision. Although one application is proposed, the project would actually comprise two short plats, at 0.49 and 0.55 acres each. Therefore, the minimum lot size would be 5,000 sf. All existing lots currently meet the minimum lot size standard for the R-4 zone. The minimum width in the R-8 zone is 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots (there are no corner lots proposed). The SE 2"d St lots would meet this requirement through lot width averaging. The minimum lot depth is 65 feet. All proposed lots would meet this requirement. The lots currently meet the R-4 lot width and depth standards Lot coverage — Both the R-8 and R-4 zones allover a maximum building coverage of 35% or 2,500 sq. ft. on lots 5,000 sq. ft. or greater. Setbacks — Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. Setbacks are different for the front, side, and rear yards. The facades fronting on the access street will be considered the front. In the R-8 zone, the front yard setback is required to be a minimum of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage accessed from the front or side yard street. Side yards in the R-8 zone are 5 feet and the minimum rear yard setback is 20 feet. In the R-4 zone, the minimum front yard setback is 30 feet, the side yard setback is 15 feet "combined" with a minimum of 5 on one side, and the rear setback is 25 feet. OL wtoaMNT p CITY OF � -"N ING Nov 2 g 2o06 P CEIVEt Puget Colony Short Plats Preapptic_..__n Meeting November 9, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Building height - Building height is restricted to 20 feet and 2 stories in both the R-8 and R-4 zones. In the R-4 zone, an additional 5 feet in height would be allowed, if the roof pitch exceeds 3/12. Landscaping The development standards require that all pervious areas of residential lots be landscaped. All landscape areas are to include an underground irrigation system unless drought -tolerant plants are used, A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of application. Access: All Iots would be accessed indirectly from Hoquiam Ave SE by either SE 2nd St or SE 2n' P1. Driveway slopes cannot exceed fifteen percent (15%) without a variance from development standards. Driveways sloped eight percent (8%) or more must have slotted drains at the bottom of the slope. Permit Requirements: Three -lot short plats are reviewed administratively. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the short plats. If the preliminary short plats are approved, the applicant must complete the required improvements and satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plats can be recorded. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat: A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 per new unit (single-family) A park and recreation fee of $530.76, per new unit (single-family) Please see the comments from the Fire Prevention plans reviewer and Public Works plans reviewer for a breakdown of the fees. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is also included with the preapplication package for reference. Expiration: The preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one- year extension. In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application hens for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the applicadonr is complete prior to making all copies. cc: Jennifer Henning CM1V7 f'L4A1NfI+fG REl O- 4 NOV 2 9 2006 King County DDES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certificate vides the Seattle King County Depart.. ,.nt of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. King County Certificate of Water Availability Do not write in this box number name ❑ Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ® Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Rezone or other Applicant's name: Conner domes Company Contact: Steve Johns ph#425-646-4439 k Proposed use: Single Family Residences — 3 Lots Location: SE 135�' Street, Renton, WA 98059 (Parcel # 692800-0540 & 0550) (attach map and legal description if necessary) 1. ❑ a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing _C(size) water main that is frontil2g the site. OR ® b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ® (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ® (3) Other (describe): Devel?Xers Extension required. District will require all related easements prior to construction. Main on 135 will need to be replaced and Hydrants to be installed. 2. ® a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval). 3. © a. The proposed project Is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. IM a. Water is available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 2500 feet from the last lot (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand Duration ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours ® 1000 gpm or more ® 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of gpm ❑ other ❑ calculation of gpm (Note: Commercial building permits which includes multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) OR ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5. ® a. Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims. Comments/conditions: Fees after Installation of main and hydrants, per Lot = WAC @ $125, GFC @ $3,200, 3/4" Meter @ $500 = $3,825.00 FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WMOU PRIOR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor Information is true. This certification shall be valid for lyear from date of signature. ICING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT #90 LESTER PIELE RENEWAL FEES: WI IN-1-YEAR $50,00 Agency name Signato name AFTER 1 YEAR $125.00 11/20/06 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUPERINTENDENT CITY OF RENTON Title (/' Signature Date NOV 2 9 2006 2:IWater Availability Cenificatcs\Water Avai]ability Conner Homes-135th, 3 lots.doc C� D Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. - - 1103 W. Meeker St Phase: 253a59 0515 Kant WA 9BEW-5751 PaDc 253-852-4732 November 22, 2006 Steve Johns Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Wetland and Stream Analvsis -- Parcels #6928000540, #550, #640, #630, & #620, City of Renton, Washington SWC Job#A6-268 Dear Steve, The report describes our findings in regards to jurisdictional wetlands, streams or buffers on Parcels #6928000540, #6928000550, #6928000640, #6928000630, & #6928000620, located in the City of Renton, Washington. Specifically, the site consists of two parcels (#6928000540, #6928000550) located on SE 2nd Street just west of its intersection with Hoquiam Avenue, and three parcels (#6928000640, #6928000630, & #6928000620) located on the north side of SE 2nd Place just west of its intersection with Hoquiam Avenue. The properties are currently undeveloped forested areas. 1.0 METHODOLOGY Ed Sewall of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. investigated the site on October 9 and November 14, 2006, using methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identijlcation Manual (WADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. Soil colors were identified using the 1990 Edited and Revised Edition of the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 1990). The Washington State Wetlands Identgioation and Delineation Manual and the Carps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation. Manual both requires the use of the three -parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be N Formerly k,•�3wrb 12 WeUand Cansufting, Inc Q �A A. Conner Puget Colony, Job#A 6-268 Sewall Welland C'onsulrinrg, Inc. November 22, 2006 Page 2 considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munseil Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%- 12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. 2.0 OBSERVATIONS Prior to visiting the site a review of several inventories was conducted including the King County Soil Survey, National Wetlands Inventory Map, King County iMap website with sensitive areas overlays, and the WDNR Forest Practice Stream Typing Maps. No streams, wetlands or hydric soils are identified on any of the inventory maps for the site. Field Observations Parcels #6928000540, & #6928000550 As previously described, the site is undeveloped forest. These parcels sit approximately 2'-3' higher than SE 2nd Street and contain a broken canopy of immature trees. The overstory includes several Douglas fir, alder and cottonwoods. Understory vegetation includes salmonbeny, sword fern, Himalayan blackberry and bracken fern. Several trails and clearings are located on these parcels. Soil pits excavated on the site revealed a dry gravelly loam with soil 09MS � ��' �No colors of 10YR 3/2-3/4. No indicators of wetland vegetation, hyd hydric soil were observed on these parcels. r Conner Puller C:olony-Joh#A6-268 Sewall Weiland Consulting Inc. November 22, 2006 Page 3 Parcels 06928000640, 06928000630, & #6928000620 These three parcels slope to the southeast and include a gravel road and piles of lawn debris and old fill on the west side. These parcels are also forested primarily with 30-40 year old cottonwoods. A dense thicket of blackberry covers the understory mixed in with sword fern, Indian plum and some facultative hydrophy-tic species such as salmonberry. A small depression was observed near the center of this area and appears to be an old excavation or test pit. Soil pits excavated within this area revealed soils with a color of 10YR 2/2 with no hydric indicators. Even after record rainfalls of the previous week no wetland hydrology was observed in this area or anywhere else on the site. Off -site -site Areas A visual review of the properties abutting the site was conducted. All of the surrounding land is developed or lawn, and no indicators of any wetlands or streams were observed. However, the stream exiting the Shy Creek Property located east of Parcel #6928000550 and separated from this parcel by one other undeveloped parcel and Hoquiam is located 130' from the site. The stream was determined to be a Class 4 stream��p c,� BV-N�n 35' buffer. This buffer does not extend onto the site. Nd� 2 9 VA j;!ECEkXjU f a Conner Puget Colony.Job#Ab-268 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. November 22, 2006 Page 4 Conclusion There are no jurisdictional wetlands, streams or buffers on the site If you have any questions in regards to this report or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at esewall@sewallwc.com. Sincerely, i� ry Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. ' 4 A Ed Sewall Senior Wetlands Ecologist (PWS #212) EVllby f of Rv-N O"h11NG %3V 2 g 2406 ftec IV U Core Design, Inc. CORE14711 N.E. 29th Race, Suite 101 DESIGN Beffevue, Washington98007 425.885.7977 Fax 425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 AND 2 Project Manager: Prepared By: Date: Core No.: RENTON, WASHINGTON prepared for CONNER HOMES Rob Stevens, P.E. Gina R. Brooks, P.E. November, 2006 06124 f� f"i(PIREB t2—fl4— F of N� ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURYEYING PROJECT OVERVIEW: The Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is located on Lots 54 and 55 of the Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat. Lots 54 and 55 are located just west of 142nd Avenue SE on the south side of SE 1356 Street. The Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 is located on the west 37 feet of Lot 61 and Lots 62, 63, and 64 of the Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat. Lots 61, 62, 63, and 64 are located just east of 140a` Avenue SE on the north side of SE 136m Street. See Vicinity Map on the following pages. The Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat was originally platted in 1968. The above referenced lots are currently vacant with forest cover. Drainage from the Short Plats sheet flows southeast ultimately to the northwest corner of 142ad Avenue SE and SE 130 Street. Three lots will be created for Short Plat 1 and five lots will be created for Short Plat 2. No frontage improvements will be constructed as part of the development of these new lots. Drainage design for the subject sites are per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As demonstrated on the following pages, the sites are exempt from providing detention and/or water quality treatment. t)e'J0-� O R 1NG 10 11 24a6 RIECIEINIED .II•� . IT ._ r/ SE ■ W04D . VICINITY MAP N P ■ 25001 DF-vE 1g QF N 1NG C RIECV 4 OFF -SITE ANALYSIS: Upstream Tributary Area The subject Lots receive only minor sheet flow from forested Lots 51, 52, and 53. Upon development of these upstream lots, the upstream area will essentially be eliminated. Downstream Analysis The downstream route for both Short Plats sheetflows east and southeast across existing lots to a concentration point located at the northwest comer of 142nd Avenue SE and SE 13e Street. Per the Boundary/Topographic Survey enclosed within the engineering plans for Shy Creek and the Level 1 Downstream Analysis for Shy Creek, both under separate cover, drainage captured by the existing catch basin is conveyed east in a 12" concrete pipe across 142nd Avenue SE to an outfall located at the northeast corner of the same intersection. Drainage is then captured by an adjacent 48" CMP intake which conveys the drainage south across SE 136`h Street. The outfall for the 48" CW discharges to a creek which is referred to as Maplewood Creek. Per the Level 1 Downstream Analysis for Shy Creek, the Creek meanders south and west until reaching the outfall into Cedar River over 1-mile away. 4:IC�ti Gov DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: Per page 1.2.3-5 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing on -site peak rate runoff control is allowed if the proposed project site developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-hour design storm event is less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions. As shown in the below calculations, the increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for both Short Plats is less than 0.5 cfs. Therefore, detention is not required for either Short Plat. Per page 1.3.5-1 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing water quality treatment is allowed if a proposed project contains less than 1 acre of new impervious surfaces that will be subject to vehicular use. See "C. Water Quality Treatment Exemption" below for how these Short Plats are exempt from providing water quality treatment. A. Hydraulic Analysis Storm water runoff for the site was modeled using WaterWorks hydrology software and the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Methodology. The soil type on the sites is Alderwood (AgC) per the King County Soils Map. The soil type falls under hydrologic group C. The precipitation rates used for this analysis are as follows: •2-year, 24-hour storm --> 2.00 in. •100-year, 24-hour storm —+ 390 in. The existing Lots are currently covered with second growth forest. The amount of new impervious area for the developed sites were derived from Table 3.5.2B of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). CITY 0�- ,Nov 2 9aofi RIECEN F-U u. 10' *nwood i i (REN ON QUADRANGLE) 1 680000 FEE 2007'30" -- . - ---I 470? Y A.0 180 000 FEET 27'3aJ DJE\j GlN QF FN N1NG NOV I g 2DO�o "W45� SOII.S MAP PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO.06124 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2,A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS INKING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP' derwood C C Orcas Peat Orldia D D Arents. Alderwood Waterial Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Eadmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Saw C Everett A /B `Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D ICltsap C Shacw D lGaus C S1 Sit C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Nelton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high Infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well -to -excessively drained sands or gravels. These sots have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Sols having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. and consisting chiefly of moderately tine to moderately coarse te3dures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Sobs having slow irttit[ration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of sobs with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to tine textures. These sots have a slaw rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Sols having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of day sots with a high swelling potential. sobs with a permanent high water table, cols with a hardpan or day layer at or near the surface, and shallow sots over nearly Impervious material. These sots have a very slow rate of water transmission. ' From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition, June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Sol InterpreWlon Record, Form 05. September 198& 001 r ';Ty OF RFi'6r0 3.5.2-2 11192 NOV 19 20 RjE(;E1U cv kR 24HOUR PRECIPITA ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24 DATA■ nr%Of% rrAT1/UYI fV A not To; ` = Vgi 1 ♦ems.. � c iWWII 10! 10 ISOPLUVIALS OF i i24-HOUR TOTAL•INCHES ll r 1 a s• KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3SIB SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type I rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 8t Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: With cover crop 81 88 94 Open spaces. lawns. parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 76% or more of the area 68 80 C86,, 90 fair condition: press cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, eta 98 98 98 i 98 , Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DUJGA � - -- - -- �. �... w_8.5 DU GA 54 7 7. Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1 ). Fora more detailed oescripnon of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering • Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9. August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 NING CITY OF FiE WN NOY 2 9 2006 to �� 0 CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 1 Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 covers a total area of 20,813 square feet or 0.48 acre. Three new lots will be developed over this area creating 3 lots/0.48 acre = 6.25 DU/AC. According to Table 3.5.2B of the 1990 KCSWDM, the percentage of impervious area for the site is 53.0 %. The impervious area is therefore, 53A°/o*20,813 square feet = 11,031 square feet or 0.25 acre. See attached Waterworks printouts on the following pages. CONNER PUGET COLONY Total Area = 0.48 acre SHORT PLAT 1 E2IISTING CONDITIONS GROUND COVER AREA acne CN 2 Growth Forest 0.48 81 Time of concentration See Site Plan exhibit on the 49.30 min. previous pages (See Waterworks printouts for calculation 1 00-ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.12 cfs CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT I DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area = 0.48 acre GROUND COVER AREA acre CN Lawn/LandscapingLawn/Landscaping 0.23 86 Impervious 0.25 98 Time of concentration Assumed 5.00 min. 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.33 cfs DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF 9ENITrON NOV 2 9 2906 RECEIVE s IM=386.46 6=14.34'40" 18"CMP E=383.36 INTAKE ��234.05 � z 24"IE E=NOT LOCATED 1 1 L ` I�SD - -432.53 �I 4-06.41'22" — 89' 1'09"W I{ RIM 10 L=198.48 36=IE j a 5- 36„IE. d 1 /4" PE PI o 2 4" I E OUTFALL ff PAINT 12 CONIC E=384.43 . i,� {-, ' ;: • � 5' UNDERGF'OUND ELTRIC INTAK �FELEPHOf� E TO PUG- SOUND POWER „ 12 IE E=383.47 AN LIGHT E NO'\'64D 1 I POWER F OUTFALL 12"IE W=383.29 I i - `, o I jE I w • Lo 00 I I - I I 1 z :J53 I �, 54 F f 56 JJJ I r � I SDMH ry I I I RIM-- -' I + f 36"I E = I 36"I E .II . I i - - - - - - - - - - ----_____ ____,--_--_ I - - - -------------- - I � REV 3PME PLANNING N882972"W 16.177 CALL - -- �N 8FqRNT 74.00 _..1r._.._ _ rn i (16J79 PLAT) LEVEL_ Win, T2006 RECEIVE( 11/15/06 11:34:_ am Dodds Engineers. —corporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC1EX100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 1 EXIST 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.48 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.48 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN.... : 81.00 0.00 TC.... . 49.30 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 129.00 ns:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0300 PEAK RATE: 0.12 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min pEVCITY OF RFNiON iNG NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED 11/15/06 11:34:_ am Dodds Engineers,—corporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PCID100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 1 DEV 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.48 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.23 Acres 0.25 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN.... : 86.00 98.00 TC.... . 5.00 min 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.33 cfs VOL: 0.12 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENT -ON Nov 2 9 Zoos RECEIVED CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 covers a total area of 33,666 square feet or 0.77 acre. Five new lots will be developed over this area creating 5 lots/0.77 acre = 6.49 DU/AC. According to Table 3.5.2E of the 1990 KCSWDM, the percentage of impervious area for the site is 54.0%. The impervious area is therefore, 54.0%*33,666 square feet = 18,180 square feet or 0.42 acre. See attached Waterworks printouts on the following pages. CONNER PUGET COLONY Total Area = 0.77 acre SHORT PLAT 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS GROUND COVER AREA acre CN Vd Growth Forest 0.77 81 Time of concentration See Site Plan exhibit on the 88.81 min. previous pages (See Waterworks rintouts for calculation 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.15 cfs CONKER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area = 0.77 acre GROUND COVER AREA acre CN Lawn/Landsca in 0.35 86 Impervious 0.42 98 Time of concentration Assumed 5.00 min. 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.54 cfs DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTOW NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT • PER PLAT W1" ,.------------- _ -- ---- �? --- ------ ` ---- ..._._._.--------- N8829'12"W f' f 'f 264.86 4 N71_ r �,, a . 42.01 LL- yam,. •}� `/\ ,L' J _ n-.. ,,1. V 06 r" I � , 1 1 O i spy----__-------------------- - - - -- _------ .--__---__--- -------- - - - - - ---_ o 5'..*NDERGR'OUND ELECTRIC POWER _ . 4 EAEMENT TO PUGET SOUND P O AND LIGHT REC. NO. 6404210 INTAKE { � I 1 12" CONC E=386.fi9 1f _ 307.47 DEVELOPME �c N88'29'12"W 670.47 NTC"-- FOUND 4"X4" CONCRETE NOV 2 9 2006 MONUMENT WITH /2S.E.2 D PL.. RECEIVE 11/16/06 3:24:2 -m Dodds Engineers, I—orporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC2EX100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 2 EXIST 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.77 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.77 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN.... : 81.00 0.00 TC.... . 88.81 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 108.00 ns:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.1500 TcReach - Sheet L: 187.00 ns:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0300 PEAK RATE: 0.15 cfs VOL: 0.13 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN{ CfTY OE RFN'TON Nov z 9 Zook RECEWE 11/16/06 3:23:5_ �,>m Dodds Engineers, ..L.corporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC2D100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 2 DEV 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.77 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres 0.42 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN.... : 86.00 98.00 TC.... . 5.00 min 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.54 cfs VOL: 0.20 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min DEV LOF MINT pLANNfNG OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2906 gEfIr rt B. Detention Exemption Per page 1.2.3-5 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing on -site peak rate runoff control is allowed if the proposed project site developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-hour design storm event is less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions. The increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is 0.33 cfs — 0.12 cfs = 0.21 efs < 0.5 cfs. The increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 is 0.54 cfs — 0.15 efs = 0.39 cfs < 0.5 cfs. Since both Short Plats do not exceed the 0.5 cfs threshold for detention installation, the subject projects will not be required to install detention systems. DEVELOPMENT PLANNfNG' CfTY OF F?,CW i NOV 2 9 2006 RELIVE It C. Water Quality Treatment Exemption Per page 1.3.5-1 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing water quality treatment is allowed if a proposed project contains less than 1 acre of new impervious surfaces that will be subject to vehicular use. Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 will have 0.25 acre of impervious surfaces. Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 will have 0.42 acre of impervious surfaces. Since both Short Plats do not exceed the 1 acre impervious area threshold for water quality treatment installation, the subject projects will not be required to install water quality treatment systems. CEvELOF,M C1Ty OF= � AN INC Nov 2 9 290E REce AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASH I NGTON ) COUNTY OF KING Michael Chen , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 28th day of November 2006, I installed 1 public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at 5000 Block of SE 2nd Street for the following project: Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 9 Project name Conner Homes, Inc. Owner Name 2, 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) waslwere constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. Installer Signature __— S B>M@EP� N to before me this 28th day of November 2006 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 22. 2008 Laurie K. Barnhart NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Carnation, WA My commission expires on 7-22-08 DEVELOPOF R PLANNING CITY RENTDN NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED N:120061061241Do&06124SignAffPugetO1.doe 11i221,06 . _ (S.E. 131ST ST,) �30 Vi M 30zi (31 O.ii�AC r 175 tor. fig r 250 116 " S.P 861053 s (4) r sz� soo.e Lj a $I 8 O !3� (n Yrs S. P. 488U38 �, a 1.38 A C. N W'� 4B r o Yr7 2i9 '� 60 U) 90 13 76 31 2b A _ 60 s $ ESMT. 310 SSX 74 i9 - co 601.75 598.27) i I 2 3 1 4 5 6 9 7 8� in � r°s � j T6, 14 M 114 s xaMh+ 2-590 rye W-4- -MA 666 6 11 15 - P14 = 13 12 II 10 9 M1 roc D w a 16 y�y Y ~ _ 1/7 97, r $ �� l • 7 5 T � O 17 sZ.ls � Tz d' f R 5701 t = IB 19 20 ,r 21 m 22 23 "- 24 W 0 ue 64 n i6.t8 ri32 TT ' 28 27 -T55 2530 (^ -! 29 _ T32 > 72 ST.Qr eti a 33 on 34 g 36 37 38 39 40 �■9 in a 47 46 45 m"44 43 42 p 41 "' e^ Q r aaa6 "' n 7 g 3 SIE h WiTrr 1 4 F 50 51 s 52 53 n P, ri z 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 r! as p _ r _ CEN � TZ _ 4r T SEC.IS .n W sR S Y "�� 4 ti/ 5>1 y� n, p1.76 (5fi8G5? r4u60 4 ..-� SE �� T.23N., R. ■ 327.ee 1€5 165.?7a E i65,77± ' A u543 a ❑q (I ? } �e 90 ; 9 (Jj I ni 0.62 Ac. V w ❑ EP �133 . , i ro0 5 r3§.75— to 80 DEV iLOPMENT PLANNING 13574� r 133'�' DE t (:)CITY OF RFNTON 3 0 r3 zr � NOY 2 9 2006 umUJ lo = - I6 0,1L ui Ik 2 'i RECEIVED W 4 H633 0.43� or' bl `" In l6 7 a (di r Q . - - . .. _ --- r3s.�1 Z {-y .4�H�1 w� ICAGO T COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE TEE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. In Witness Wbffwf, CIUCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed y .-..J nY0. .s.l. i7rlku i70 '.i tire r�sfCai h: _,ji i iltic;:lir signatory. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 3400 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER 701 5TH AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206) 628-5666 DEv CITY OF RF NOV Z S RECEVI` _ CHICAt;O TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Presidenl ATTEST: '2� z - S..ta y Fonn C 9800 (Reprinted 09/00) t CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001218798 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: CONNER HOMES FROM NEEDHAM 1A_-___-.__ --- 846108TH AVENUE NE, SUITE 202 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 ATTN. BOB BEESON 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, -- .. please -contact -us. _. - - - ... _.. -7 7 1 Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNIT10-YOUR COMi'LIMBUILDER/DEVELOPERSERVICECENTER- WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALLYQURT= INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUIS1711ON, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDMSION. MIKE HARRIS TIT1,E OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (&MAIL• MICHAEI HARRIS@CTT.COM) IUI EISENBREY TTI-LE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 , -MAII z ICEXMEISENBREY@CTT.CQM) STEVEIONSELIA CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 (F,NVUL- STEVEXINSELLA@CTECO W BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR T= EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (206) 628 5657 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<« <<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower, Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e-mail addresses have chaDI&AW 3 NiNG CITY OF-t Nov 2 9 2006 !RECEIVED C s,:AGO TITLE INSURANCE COmPANY M1 FIFFH AVENUE, #3400, SEA.TILE, WA 98104 A_L_T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order No.: 1218798 Title Unit: U-10 Customer Number: CONNER HOMES FROM NEEDHAM -� .-..-.hone.- --(206)6U-5623...—. � y �s ...:. _.. CONNER—HOMES.. --COM7 ANY- -...-.. Fax (206)628-5657 Commitment Effective Dater SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $220, 000.00 1992 EXTENDED Premium: $1, 0 74. 0 0 EXTENDED RESIDENTIAL RESALE RATE T $ 94.51 COMBINATION RATE Proposed Insured: CONNER HOMES COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $o _ 00 Premium: Tax Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be, issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $ o . o o Premium: Proposed Insured: Tax 2 . The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3 _ Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: THOMAS A. NEEDHAM AND JANIS M. NEEDHAM, HUSBAND AND WIFE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as Follows: NOV 2 9 2006 SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT RECEIVED COMhfAB05/KirCji i.l.RS CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1218798 C'O1Q3i8K' BOF�S"ZAW�`F88Q81LM - " ---"�- LEGAI< DESCRIPTION EXEIiSIT . - aragrap 4 of Scl}edule A continuation) LOTS 54 AND 55, PUGET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON- DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON CL,A,�,,� s Zoos RECEIVED CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA_ COMMITMENT SC14EDULE B OrderNo.: 1218798 Your No,: Commt 9oms PROD! mmDmx Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company.. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, at for state workers' _ compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents o; in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, inuian tr;oal cedes or regulations; .fudm treaty ur aDmigmm rignln, mctuding easeuaeuts ur e4uitawlei serrituries. H. Water rights, claims, or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Nov 2 9 2006 RECEIVED WITACOM6fRU W-A CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L_TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Your No.: - SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1_ COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF PUGET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM ROAD FRONTAGE RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 10, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6404210 a 3. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE; ITSE: AND THE RTGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 79509 n 4. CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JUNE 21, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9606210966 REGARDING: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE s 5. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. DEVELOPMENT FLANNING ? OF RENTpni Nov 2 g 2906 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) OrderNo.: 121879-8.._.....- Your No.: MN)MR HOMBS FROM RREDMAK T _ SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS — -- _-- THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. - = ENER A Ai�iD- PEeI L AX AND.. CUARGES-i PAYA;BL-E­F-EBRUhk2- —_ -5-T. _ .i�LS-I NQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: LOT 54. 2006 692800-0540-03 4342 (WILL BE 2146 YEAR) $ 30,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 385.17 PAID: $ 192.59 UNPAID: $ 192.58 IN THE 2007 TAX c 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2006 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 692800-0550-00 LEVY CODE: 4342 (WILL BE 2146 IN THE 2007 TAX YEAR) ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 30,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 385.17 O'F PAID: $ 192.59 1Ty OF R ANN1NG N CLrnCM82 9 ? ft CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMNMIAENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Your NO.: course norms mom avaDwx SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS UNPAID: $ 192.58 AFFECTS: LOT 55. a 8_ TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL HE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS E THROUGH H WILL REMAIN IN THE OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT --- --T—r«IzTr--FOL-LAW,._.... ... ..... - . — — - IF THE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE IS LESS THAN 4 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMITMENT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR TITLE OFFICER IMMEDIATELY_ x 9. PRIOR TO ISSUING AN EXTENDED FORM OWNER'S POLICY THIS COMPANY REQUIRES THAT THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION PROVIDE AN ALTA/ACSM CERTIFIED, AS -BUILT SURVEY. a 10. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE �,r,T �-r7 TO 'rSSrUR Tp "aRT]:F9 TO I Et.zz wrm rur om-7-0Trs TT??k'9%^aC°Tlnvx MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOFq NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. x NOTE 1: THE PREMIUM FOR THE EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY -IS ITEMIZED AS FOLLOWS: DESCRIPTION AMOUNT STANDARD COVERAGE: $ 574.00 SALES TAX: $ 50.51 EXTENDED COVERAGE SURCHARGE: $ 500.00 SAFES TAX ON SURCHARGE: $ 44.00 TOTAL PREMIUM, INCLUDING TAX: $ 1,168.51 NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JAN]UARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WI FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENfU � ��p�NN��G CLTACMB2 D .y_ CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A_L.TA. COMMrrMENT SCITEDULE B (Continued) Your No.: comim eoms rxom xasaam - SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.METROKC.GOV/RECELEC/RBCORDS AND SELECT ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE ----�-------.—�-*�3t�J-=31i�H�84US�':-AL50--PrP�-EARL-I-#�3F.��D3t�?F_=TIC:-D�JMF..kTi•.�---_--__---- TOTS 54-55 VOLUME 86 PLATS PG 59_ AS OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2006, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 692800-0540-03 AND 692800-0550-00. END OF SCH$DUILE B f) _ �` 0 Rrp CHICAGO TITLL : i,4 SURANCE COMPANY 17M MVT'H AVENUE, alAfWt OnATTLE, WA 98-4 1 PHONE: 206)628-5623 FAX (206)628-5657 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. ..... _Kul ow 75111 a5�o 51. ss7Tsl ? GfiSO !f I[I 40692$f,7C1 u- rleJ i Ivl nu �02b ,t 20 r • Q276 r Oi7 O t mi0 62W _ .5 0.� - x=1711 4Z20 � � l- 117.SJ �' R-Jd•n r �y'� 36 am 04W -_ -+� 1 � J •�?b wt _ k�j �'i� �y lij 6160 lit" Sr a�a r f _ bau 6 am w.JJ x ,ism aav 0m OS33 Jr aw. [ C540 06CA Mes �I -- Rt LIA l6VOt U G/M SI III[0 9 OpQ YIyL sr �tl P6i0 �0 ASeo O6B0 c�a �...T it 'i1,it Y 7 1/ISIJ[57[ 1[L51 NOV 2 9 2006 ' `ec&V D EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) 4. Any claim, which arises out of triv .ransaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN-P-OLIGV( €ORM-(1g-.17-92)---.-_._ The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change In the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. - - - li -...An ovi3rrirnental ---hce -- y g po ' power not exr:liided by'(a) above; exact Cti} the-e]Cterlt that a notice iiTihe exBl`C�s�ePeaf ---��` or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain uniess notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge- 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an Insure;d tiodpr thN miliny; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of o :::: y 'except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law, 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (1) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or DEVELOPMENT PLANNING -ITY OF (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except wvk E ON the preferential transfer results from the failure: NOV 2 9 2006 (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor RECEWMED w . F.cn:l er IUEi1uF$i OF --'- ..� WHlH ItEGOttI>gO IETUIyt Tp IC'rN+s a�ACE-rpnwa �axsng:�i i REC�iY�tr , � � �• i i fGiiQ LiOUNiY BY :a l E,;fl1f-$tuff'-; _---RM _..__ 6 ImN.��. . &i --' THE GRA.NfTO t P. SALAIDNSEN CONSTRUCTIOR CO., INC., a Washington Oorpoeation 41 farandlneoaeldee *mof $10.00 and *them valuable considerations in hard paid,iarl mandwwmnbin THONAS A. WEE0NAH 3 JANIS N. NEEDHAM, husband and wife *A fdkwi" deam1md real M&W aia wl In it. Caualp of KIM0 ,SUL DeUladrintim. tata.34 and 95, Puget Colony Homes, as per plat recorded in Yolumo 86 of Plats, Page 59, records of King County, tiashington. SUBJECT TO easements. restrictions and reservations now of record. Doted ,fume 10 { v 87 IL ....... - ------- STATE (W NASHMr.'WN �} MINTY fw (In thiq tin- ba+�nnmlilr aP1•I41ed 1ef+•er aea he tar kawax w hr dw iwd6-kk nt dea . wd in and rhw v vgwmfr4 U.e witNa and fnrerraiw imArummt. MW arkrPwfq-.t" thal . . . agrd tiles magtr ■s ("0 •a.d Val.raamly art and 4t4 lk.r the *aces and purer - (tweia memkoed. GIVEN andee my bond mad .Meal !tat Chia day of — - — .. ....._....19,._.._ Nutllry Tlutiie tq cad fw tA! States as Waibr tiTA,B OF l4ASWWGITOH cotn,jTy or Su.__ ish Qfl RIIiy7J flay of I9 6(otR• W •C Ill 6e tar. Ilfr qnd. nMmawd. awf f Ike• of r 1' iw¢tm., dWY R A ,in. m....,r�.lceanrn 4.:r ..per •.a,.cti.{\Ply. lt.e [9 lMa Ii.I 1 �L Ia4 •�._ thr taM inxtrumm" to hr the Irer and �dWl dK4 a4 clad ef� ■Iiwm fFyw+jy:=J1hr aeea and 7rlrPoaRa lbeninr�:r7t�o�111pn'e�d.�MA on wtk tlated Wt � m *W L�.Rpd M 7R! ll ri�r=Ie afYif14 VO/1�.� N and Uwt the At methe do and Ymr "EVIELOPME ». . �t71' OF -9FN p�N'NG ..........__... IeaiiGas at., NOV 292006 - i PUET SOLO N Y HOM S ---- KIIic CoU'1 , Wl4HIMGTOR FREDERIM M_ DRAKE � EN6INEE!!'r. JA► . IS60 r _ - ==r,=• - . � SCALE - I INCH'ka00 FEES_ Xr 'xsYf vl . •• 3 g>; 6' I5 11w Iq•,i--S,•• �• rJ�14I 134 12 II - X iy,, �• c -wry— -,... _ .1 � � •y �NM. ! h.r� 4i ti `i: 16 i9 ; 20 � 21 22 '•23 � 524. f 25 �' ,r _ vim+•"""!.!• �� �� '%` j�a11 ve ~ ��,=efT�~ 4 uric. 4 •4 '442 ~ 4 i i41 S f a + �+ yam• � - f "_ Fri 52 6'}: I 3 g 55 ,, # x NT + �r MAr 54 63 6J 60 �9 5g + ' !4 .f ! 3 ST +f ,1VM :.• :/cRy .,.+tM AfN MN +ten• — : 4w- ww+•a:v!r sIT rs SZOMMU= D$ m WE OrOMXM OR •tl SURVtYEYORS CERTIFICATE v- -~ • rr »~__'--,;:•'-''c:A4i✓6 a/.&aPwa txq�rrarvddr>bxes®ri6+a" a►»Y/ "A, ve�o�sww�i'+iY/dr�w" stage/�4.dds"a.i6rirx lrri�o'�i+dade a�s!/jdl. M.+6d� 'A DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION,t�rf 1j MEDICATION ew/e+er 4rA, AW ,de A#'" r �v5nd�rrdlrieaae 1.dsS�tiAF�w�drx�.Aa.esaef'i�/+mr�1e�,Aood�aa'f>. 111j; rJy iCtc rei li._. IL,Wfw�•fp•fSkv�ril✓.as�pv£p�0o!�cimi':k•+Gwal+sd.��4: wirno:I l'R+nre' .FsrlK�.lS•�•�v.e�"e_�s�.fin.i(' A .6.4v. f O_,- -, • _ - _°qo'on�Ab"a°��.,icvt�•ywar�,veJ�•�ygro++�d�rPT'_'.'�`�1���/•�z�___ ------------- - t `• �iu��'ar le tears .. ii�16v/erR/ivfi{1�6j';✓_��J�—!lllj�nfre.vn".ikmofirriy� d ;pMi{aov eyasa�edrief- evrffJsaidin}"aJdC4 �KYa7,�bf /lyaf! a �, leer-11�ir�i d9/L�i ray= w';Z, d.nr,Fi�nwyi �bLw.6fe x s Y'h„po•+atb+/,.mie rps�d IIF:r�%tiv nrdk•�twi� oGdivrion widacE',..w�/iud y�rvf3dr�b'plf m'r."y»�i�modohv'[f✓ar�rar�/iaii5-.Kr �rrr am! uv .evt/.wn.f'galmY a "A awlfa-i d k —Z, -k / eldsa�`fxd�v Ar'saipw�n+F w" %ae�pv+eti :,�i:LO✓ a/��f p�pll^l�i•lCyt.T- - y, eTnpr 'CERTIFICATE 6340948 r-- miw� psri3•ru�i,..etair'.sra•vhfe.Iifccxr_.f4_dtD�/s .d, �.�r__1� _.-- /�r,drerb d /�e:C Ar'vvke� o�d.L�ir1L+r'.� f .v�c/i"v�' .✓fir fI 1 mrdlvn kma+�f.�w, acv d^roasv .ry w- r�fv r�.ew4�AR ePdhmSws cn: ki+ewl r.'+1fdfraoeid,®teu�x•.rlA.ir�!"i.Z ��/dlY�I✓YJrJd /f tp�r/Cl!! l.ISeTIM �Va aN 0a1�f+�D��.IfY' N4+'441�NY}fP Ib CY! �%rJiVfrli//rh�� �amrmrfir.•rlir Afr m-p�rm� �lslisir .ar�rGm. �cs 2 4 -: -. TFRS II+f4Fa'FCIIRE trade this 6tfi between. PUGET COLONY HOHEs; INC,_ hereinafter called "Grantor", and PUGET SOt1NR POWER 6 urwr camPANY, a Wanhiailan t7orporatlnn, and ~ � •' hereinafter called "Oranree•"_ . - - --- ' - - That is cortsidcratian of One Dollar If I.0o) and other valuable eoatlderadonr:, recut r:f rrblrli in Mrebp aeMnpri ed, dre grantor hereby grants and conveys- to the grantee, its successors and assigns a right of way eatiealwl[ for an M&rarotmd and • _ system..aageWrr, with the right 10 oonestract, teaeaan+lct, Operate, hrtpeet, tralnWri or-rasnovis rWi same, .. cables. manholes: iwdts and'sgttiorfedbtomd�lsirmtcedl1fUe�pads:-pata3� — formers and othe r necessery or conMent facilities aril equipment on said right of way. over, order• upon and serous the toitowting described property located in gl n County, State or Washingtnm Lots 1 through 64 of Puget Colony Hoafas located In Section 15. Township 23 North, Range 5 East, V. H.. as recorded in Yoluaw 86 Of Plats, Pa9a1 — 59 =� Records of King County, Na--hingtart. " t— sdd right of way is do, srrYlrr,l as fnf loa'�: Five (5) Feet parallel and adjacent to the read frontage of above described lots. Graillve y kill have the right of necers arrow the adjacent land of Ou. Grtmlor. ns well as the rig to twiatvcs, eperatt• teal nruintain rise nere,�Yat , vaultti ate! tnaalwlt^t adjoining xaid i'i•iAl of wary. Grantor for himcrfl• his In•ira, eAeCuturs, arianini5lrntors. ruccessors and a*:ij4ms comments that nm atructure will be ereeted or 1wrritiit}I within ;;nkl right of ua%- Mal would .interfere kith or endanger the unrestricted exercise of the rifFhlx and privileges herair, grantirl: mat no tliltgirpt, hrrrrrtling or other form of tatsirricrkorl aclisity will b,r done or permitted within said right of way which will disturb Ihr• rompartian or une-wrih iM• lrnrtia or rquipnr.,rt therroa. or in any other way strove, threaten or endanger the lateral -support to mid rIA111 of way or facifitir!z loedtot thercln. that no blasortit will be permtiaA within 0151 feet of the right of wady, and that nu r•tlncnYt•. tar ur rnit,-r prrntarwrit t-urratrow mi;,n iw intitnitt•41 or permitted ever or eiihin ano root of the sidor. a any vnuh or in, Ic InwUllrrl on a id pnxwriy. . uldh a ay, at•wi may I,hri. ti,:n:h• anl. n-txadr said .- 911.i t,: .s.,; :a.• ��nas wr;.y�.,r to rr..::r.k, be t,a. sasry inr^fiYt: constryctiaa. uporatioa teal nrairnrtmrre• of -'aid r;u•ilitirs. All "intuit -or pahle laid nndvr this grant ;:rYt! be IwriLri to such dtyth ::I to faterfe^- -49!1 the ordinary laridscW4og of said ril;ht of w;ry, r,rvk-irkmI hoati+r,•r, Itlar rA% trkn-• . Mhnihti. ur hushes shall he planied thereon withorii first hgriaf obtained .rrittem upproval franc rht-grantee• 1N tal'rNF_S.q WBIF.REOFF •hi, he irtmlent hmY hewn rtii,•utrd the day nod year first above written - off. Tar- P � 1 l>e rni� da�;r•rv,inatle• utyr,•anvl IYrrorr me 4t m,• I.iarart In I. Ilx• Fialividual descritwd in mt w,tu rae,`ut♦ 1 e eft r orty;Q ug atrumeat. a w t. n l ,'iF,k,t Ilk- rmw a,: ffre ark! exduniary' :rri anal rierd for the Imes and purposes therein meneio^�-t GICF X wv4•r my halal and nlfiriai "cal Hair _d... of Ix rr�idinF. at Mary- Pulpiry inmul fnr the `tarp n i_- t rIwmmn. ^' '7:1T E Ot: 1t .l INI NGTO N ComTyor Pi3rce ` Orr this 6th Ja% of rY,trtt - IA 68 before me. rho ulbdersl8rred. personally apPe U _ and"�i_fir.. a1= rn rrra• kncouv to he the Prrrf�,4t ! Secretary. respectively of ci7i� �dh Au]e# Galore i;� g, igt.�., the rnrporatlar drat txecur YYfI tin• t�nlony uasrrumerei.brk-aCkm��iRnT�c i rnstrumcm Ia a rev- am .owuary act an of said satyoration�1�(o�J die u(li :ukl purpnsri thk-., • n fir:'Mi(1M!al, and err oath d lhoi fhp__e_ ,orborixeJ to execute the said iosiruirrient turd chat'�l uftlt,rk it thr ca,ptrra'.• �'C;ri yi,i anr;boratiutf - 11'i a is la .. t.-at h,arern affiae ti ¢kr dnc and tear first aMire vrirran ' rrSitlinp ll �_ LaCQ163 rrawforRotoiij r i rr m ..M ur t • : isle u as tty:ttin- Reoueaf al Pugai Sartr d I ewer 8 l;ghr Co. rr r: ...,r r- a •^ r r__.-, .. ...ate.,. �AV 7) S e. ar 7,A !,/ sr.• i:•� •tf�" ��" f/sS�r.4K�.C_c.rr. ��y�/�i�.•7 . 14 Los �---- 4E CIPY MEW Or R�N7 pNNIAIG Nov 19 goo 6 WHEN RECOADED RETURN 1'Q ,office of the city L!,,rk R"t" ).junici'.1 6ailding r 200 MM AVCnW South r-f LU 4Z-- 4t,M CERTMTE k 1. the 64TIV Vark of the City Of Pla,110A, WasMogtGn, cer* that this is a true and cmect copy of R-D 4 1, /0- a, Subsobed and Seal r Z CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGMN ORDnLUICE NO. 4612 " onnancE of Tim CITY OF. xswou, ESTABLISM1.0 AM ASSES$MENT D19TRICr FOR SMXTARr SMOM SN"Icz xx A PORT11011 OF THE SOUTH HxGMAMS, DOWS, AND IUMMMD SUB -BASIN S AM ESTA LXXH33ffG THE AxomqT 03r TuE mmr-K upox cowmcTrw To Tax riLcmETrzs. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REMN, WASHINMY, DO ORDAIN 9 AS FOLLOWS. SECTICK la There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special Assessment. District for the area served by. the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Xntercepto.r in the northeast quadrant of the itv izrharz �;rs�:-ata ar�,�-_. =incorporated Xin,3 Collnty, , which area is more particularly described in Vxhlbit 'RAv attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as Exhibit "8.A' The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the City does not require payment until such time as the parcel is connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The property may be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of paymexxt of the charges op associated with this district. C/ry RNj? -3 ON szcTzgx li- Persons connecting to the sanitary sewe pol/ A� facilities in this Special Azseasment District and which propertlu 0 1Wi1VANCF 4612 o- have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the Fast Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall -- -- -p-iz�dditi�s3ei____ _ttiyrctmt .... tYe- Cnriectii" addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A.. Per -_Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224 _a2 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of. $0.069 per square .Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder E are included within the boundary legally described in Fxhibi.t "A" and which boundary is shown on the m p. attached as Exhibit "1113.1 S9CIEA xrx_ In addition to. the aforestated charges, there ut'n� iea v L �,cua . ;i. i i. dci a-11urn ,.iddiad Cc) C.Ile L G'"i: 4J%iS ts, '.- laxC ,;'ci , The . interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. fi=rON IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) dabs after publication. " 1 PASSED BY 'THE.CITY COUNCIL this loth day of 3une 299b, E i i Maril eteisen; City Cleric DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 3 CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2006 RFC,EIVED LJhIlE Ml` CE 4 612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of June Approve as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date. of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96.as. VIl 1996. F f Ifiv�OP E CJ77:O�OJvl�G - NOV 2 24 _ _A Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPMAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON - EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portioris of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 14. 15, 16, 17, 21 and 22. all in Township 23N, Section B, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section S, Township 23N. P nge 5E W.M. ling East of the East right-of-way line of SR 405 and South of the following d line: Beginning at the intersection of the East Brie of said Section 8 with the centerline of NE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its ------___. �Ane ion_w th t «nterline jof Sunsa_SoulevankriE;-- the centerline of Sunset Bodlevard NE to the North line of the Southeast Y o said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the .East right�f-way line of SR 405 and the terminus of said line. Section 9, Township 23K Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying South and East of the following described line: lAa g b1i UU,i;: ceriLea firle +t�i 1'�r.. :tA .r[. .,. a t 1L, �i_:�1�..► as910,.: aV.� � a, i3�.�Y�ar l;_ of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along.the centerline of NE 7th Street to its hitersection with the centerline of h4onroe Aw--,Tae h'E; thence North akkng said centerline to the South line of the Northeast l/ of said Section 9; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE: thence Northerly along said centerline t,o its intersection with the centerline of NE 10th Street; thence East along said center ne to the Fast line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. A1I of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly and Westerly of the following described line:: Beg Bing on the West line of Section 10 at its intersection with the North line of the South e6 of the North 1h of said Section 10; theme East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of the Southeast xl4 of said Section 10; thence East along said North Bite to its intersection %j*k-fhe East line of said Section 10 and the tera�nus of said line. cfg o, rPtANNINr, NOV Z 9 2006 F.'"TAWMM-=o b Legal Description of Ow SDI Assessment District for the Cf Kenton— East Renton Inter for Pu e 2 a 3 Section 11, Township 23N, Flange 5E W.M. All of the Southwest V4 of Section 11, Township 23N, Range 5E W.K. Section 14, Township 23K Range 5E WA - Al of that portion of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest A of said section, together with the Southwest V4 of said section, except the South 1h of the Southeast 1/4 of said Southwest V4 and except the plat of McIntire Homesites and �6 of streets adjacent as recorded In the Book of Plats. Volume 58, Page 82. Records of Sing County, Washba&n, and crept the South 151.55 feet of the East 239,435 feet of Tract 6. Bkock 1 of Cedar F ve r Five Acre 1Yacts as recorded in the Book of Plats, Volume 16, Page 52, girds of ill\1G VVYliV', i4 {ii7lfiL�iYi�,. i4VY / YV Wv fi ML..+iG .i1.LFM i.F+�.+V.4f M �a err v+ 81ock and less Tract 6, Block 2 OC said Cedar River Five Acre Txacts, less of ;p the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and c=ept the South 82.785 feet of O? the East 159 feet ofTract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts and less 'A the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. C� to Section 15 Township 23N Range 5E W.M. t,Q � � g All of that portion of Section 15, Towwhip 23N, Range 5E. W.M., except the ]/ r;� �np7fvb-%T Ct ]&.of �ic1 czer-tior Section 16, Township 23N, Flange 5E W.M. All cif that portion of Section 16, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M., emoept that portion of the Southeast 1l of the Southeast K of the said Section 16 lying East of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39. page 39, P&cords of King County Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast K of the Southeast Y4 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying.Southearly of the Northerly right-of-way line of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway). Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range aE W.M., hing Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR- 1 69 Maple 'Valley 14i6way and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-•405 less that rUon lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson �� cr7Y of F� �NN1nVG NOV 2924 # F"WREMIT Leger Dzscdption of the Special Ass sment District far the Ci o Rentar� — Fast Renton tar page 3 3 between the South lice of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. --- Secdon-2#� T'ownshIp 2 t►1,-Range-SE All that porn of Section 21, Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-ofway line of SR 169 Maple Valley Highway) and West of the _East lane of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23K Range SE WA. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N. W.M. described as All of the Northwest' 4 of the Northeast V4 of said Section 22 Nord=ly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood He%hts as recorded �e Book of Plats, volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County, Washington. ` Together with the North 227' 11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast V4 of the Northeast fe of said Section 22. i tD 0 Op�� n� FAO'VNI1vG N0V 9 2006 1 ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 11-29-2006 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-147 Payment Made: Total Payment: 1,000.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: R0605873 Payee: CONNER HOMES COMPANY Trans Account Code Description 5008 000.345.81.00,0004 Binding Site/Short Plat Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description ------------------ --------------------------- Payment Check 56450 Account Balances Amount ---------------- 1,000.00 Amount --------------- 1,000.00 Trans ------ Account Code ------------------ Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 ------------------------------ Park Mitigation Fee --------------- .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees _00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.61.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 500� 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00,0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81,00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00,0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) O0 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Conner Homes Company 7395 City of Renton W00AMOUNI LL - 11-30-06 111606 830200 App. fees 2000.00 2000.00 vlctodg 0 0 'LS CHE1 CHECK 56450 TOTAL> 2000-00 11-16-06 DATECK NUMBER 7 0 PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS