HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1Matt Flynn
5301 Ripley Lane
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (425) 221-8660
(owner)
PARTIES OF RECORD
Flynn Front & Side Setback Var
LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
tel: (253) 826-9224
(contact)
James & Cindy Huse
5227 Ripley Lane N
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (425) 204-2092
(party of record)
Updated: 06/02/09 (Page 1 of 1)
P.
r
rn
rp
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
110 01A, 46 0118105
Date: June 29, 2010
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy M Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Project Name:
Flynn Setback Variances
LUA (file) Number:
LUA-08-071, SME, V-A, V-A
Cross -References:
AKA's:
Project Manager:
Jerry Wasser OQ
Acceptance Date:
Applicant:
Jim Brandt
Owner:
Matt Flynn
Contact:
Jim Brandt
3 PID Number:
3343302795
ERC Decision Date:
ERC Appeal Date:
Administrative Approval:
June 2, 2009
Appeal Period Ends:
June 16, 2009
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision:
Date:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision:
Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Shoreline Exemption for the the
construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances
from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-2-110A) regulating front and side yard
setbacks In the Residential - 8
dwelling units per acre R-8 zone.
Location:
5301 Ripley Lane N
Comments:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D c�cyof
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.:
PROJECT NAME::
PROJECT MANAGER:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
CONTACT (if other than Owner)
June 2, 2009
Flynn Setback Variances
LUA08-071, SME, V-A, V-A
Gerald C. Wasser
Matt Flynn
5301 Ripley Lane
Renton, WA 98055
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of
Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
for the construction of a carport in association with a single
family residence on a 3,000 square foot site. The applicant
states that the proposed carport would cover an existing
parking pad and would be 17 feet in height. Access to the
proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N. The
proposed project would take place approximately 70-feet
from the existing bulkhead which is the Ordinary High
Water Line (OHWL). Staff has recommended that the
proposed project be reduced in size to accommodate a one
parking space carport. All work would take place on the
landward side of the bulkhead.
PROJECT LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NE QUARTER SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E
SEC-TWN-R: 29 T24N R5E
WATER BODY/WETLAND: Lake Washington
An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted
on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4-9-190.C.7 and/or for the following reason(s):
XX Pursuant to RMC4-9-190.C.7, construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or
contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his
family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade.
Single family residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by
one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous
ownership which are a normal appurtenance. Construction authorized under this
exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark.
The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one):
CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
® ❑ Policies of the Shoreline Management Act.
N/A The guidelines of the Department of Ecology
where no Master Program has been finally
approved or adapted by the Department.
® ❑ The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program.
"" ) �,- Lt-
C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director
Planning Division
Attachments: A. Zoning Map
B. Site Plan
C. East and South Elevations and Upper and Lower Floor Plans
D. North Elevation and Roof Framing Plan
cc: Owner/Applicant
Contact
City of Renton Official File
A4 - 20 T24N R5E W 1/2
A-71-Ac- � ��4ej--4T 9
S Me
CA --
SF 7sln sl
OCR
COR
�F
CA
I �
I
o- KE 440l s!
i6N
j rs�3`p° N
V�
I ig CA
f
NF 43rd St
el CA �.
C4 - 32 T24N R5E W 1/2
VY B4
ONING C.2
+, -+ P TECH ICASI'RVICF„S `�'''� LFeet 29 T24N R5E W 1/2
�r'
I' Or 07/ti1f18
1 '� 5429
I
,Q�zI
^ -(-TAc Nt r
J
g i
19
W
1L
1
� F
2�
'
il
ai
,0-,C2
S L -S2
,6
�I
Z 0
d
s
4
d G
Q
r
Lv
� �
G�VE�Of- A3Fh1T PI_+?�J^1i!-�
CITY ]� qEN` U1
OCT <
5 2u58
RECEIVED
i.
I II
'I k.
�L
U
f:
h
T
�cr
'"
LCI ILLi
r
� �
� �
n trE7 -�
FLU
O� UJ
LU —�
w
City of Renton
REPORT Department of Community & Economic Developn
& ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REPORT
DECISION LAND USE ACTION
DECISION DATE: June 2, 2009
Project Name: Flynn Setback Variances
Owners: Matt Flynn, 5301 JZihley Lane North, Renton, WA 98056
Appllcant/Contact., Jim Brandt, Brandt Dcs'[,gn Services, P.Q. Box 7785, Bonney Lake, WA 98391
File !Number: LUA08-71, SMh, V-A, Project Manager: Gerald Wasser, Associate I'lantiez-
V-A
Project Description: The applicant is rcgtwshnt, approval of a Certificate of Fxemption fro.ni Shoreline
Substantial Development 1'ermit for the construction of a carport in association with a
single farrrily residewLc amd Administrative Variances from the provisions of the
Renton Municipal Code (R\SIC 4-2-110A) regulating front and side yard setbacks ire
the Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. 'Ihe applicant is proposing to
construct a carpoil �l ithin the front and side yard setbacks in association with a single
family residence on a ?.(_'100 square foot (landward area) site.. The protect site is
located at the north lwundm-v of fl e City. The variances would he for: 1) a 2--foot. 6-
inch side yard setback (illon- the south property line) where 54cet is required; and, 2)
a front yard setback �N luck would vary from approximately 3-feet to approximately 9-
feet where 20-feet is recuired. Access to the proposed carport would be front Ripley
Lane N. The property is Ideated on the shoreline of Lake Washington and, therefore,
a Shoreline F,xenihtion is required for development associated with a single family
residence.
Project Location: 5301 Ripley Lane North
{�fn�tnrsrrativrr Valwrnci' Re -pore UJA08-071 SHC, t,"-4. 1 A r1oc' Project Location Map
QREPORT
[x
DECISION
City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REPORT & DECISION
LAND USE ACTION
DECISION DATE: June 2, 2009
Project Name: Flynn Setback Variances
Owners: Matt Flynn, 5301 Ripley L aneNorth, Renton, WA 98056
Applicant/Contact: Jim Brandt, Brandt Design Services, P.O. Box 7785, Bonney Lake. WA 98391
File Number' 1.UA08-71, SMT;, V-A, Project Manager, Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner
V-A
Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a carport in association with a
single family residence. and Administrative Variances from the provisions of the
Renton Municipal Codc (RNIC 4-2-110A) regulating front and side yard setbacks it)
the Residential - 8 dwelling, units per acre (R-8) zone. The applicant is proposing to
construct a carport within the front and side yard setbacks in association with a single
family residence on a 3,000 square foot (landward area) site. The project site is
located at the north boundary of the City. The variances would be for: 1) a 2-foot, 6-
inch side yard setback (along the south property line) where 5-feet is required, and, 2)
a front yard setback whicli would vary from approximately 3-feet to approximately 9-
feet where 20-feet is required. Access to the proposed carport would be from Ripley
Lane N. The property is Ideated on the shoreline of Lake Washington and, therefore,
a Shoreline Exemption is required for development associated with a single family
residence.
Project Location: 5301 Ripley Lane North
Administrative Variance Report LUA08-071 SMC, 1 "-. f, V-1. doc Project Location Map
On: of Rcwon Depajlmefa o. comomwial' c$ Ecwr wnic lki,t /on?c)n Adminisivalivc 1"arionce Report d Dccision
FLY:V:'s` SETBACK VARIANCES L(L-108-071, SMC, t'-:1, V-14
.Irrf�e'. 'i1G9 Ya,�e ? 0/8
A. Type of Land Use Action
Conditional ("se
Site Plan Revieiv
Special Permit for Grade & b ill
X I Administrative Variance
B. Exhibits
Binding Site Plun
.Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Administrative Code Detcrrnination
X Shoreline Permit Exemption
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and
other docunictltation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit 2: Site Plan
Exhibit 3: East and SoLtih l:le% ations and Upper and Lower Floor Plans
Exhibit 4: North Elevation and Roof Framing Plan
Exhibit 5: Zoning hIap
Exhibit 6: Letter from .lames ,& Cindy Huse (dated April 15, 2009)
Exhibit 7: Certificalc of_ I gumption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
C. Project Description / Background:
The project site is approximately 12,960 square fcct in area, but over three-quarters of this are covered by
water. The area located landward of the waterline is 3,000 square feet. The site is currently developed with a
single family residence, attached one -car rind a dock The property slopes down from east to west
(from Ripley Lane North to Lake Washfii ton). The existing house is located on the shore of Lake
Washington behind an existing concrete bulklictld.
The project site includes a concrete parking pact within the front and side yard setbacks which the applicant
currently uses for vehicle parking. The applicant seeks to construct an open sided carport over the existing
parking pad creating two additional coverccl parking spaces. The carport would be 350 square feet in area and
17 feet in height with roof pitches matching, the existing house and garage- This project would require
variances from the front and side yard setback rc(Juircrnents specified in RMC 4-2-110A. A 20-foot front yard
setback and a 5-foot side yard setback are required for attached accessory structures in the R-8 zone, The
applicant is proposing a two car carport addition which would encroach into the front yard setback from
approximately 3-feet to approximately 9-fect and irito the side yard setback along the south property line by 2-
feet, 6-inches.
Lake Washington is it shoreline of statewide significance. The City's Shoreline Master Program designates
this area as an Urban Environment. Construction ofa single family residence or associated structures for use
by the owner or owner's family requires a Shoreline Pennit Exemption.
D. Findings
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following:
I) The subject site is located at 5301 Ripley Lane North.
2) Zoning: The site is located in the Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone.
Administralive Variance Report LUA08-071, SMC V_A, t'-A-doc
011• of Renton Depal' orre w of Corrrrrrrrreity & Economic D, 1, /o,vmcw .4dminisiraihv Variance Rcporl & Decrsiorr
FLYN,NSETRACK VARIANCES LUA08-071, SMC. Y-,4. VIA
J1101e ?. 2004 - -- - —------------ _ — - Prr�y 3 nJ 8
3) Topography: The site slopes downward Crom cast to west.
4) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include-.
North — single family residences in King Cc}Lrnty;
South single family residences (1:-8 rorlimT):
East — former BNSF railroad tracks,
West — Lake Washington.
5) The applicant proposes to build a 350 square foot carport with open sides, 17 feet in height at the front
of the property.
b) Request: The applicant has requested appi-m al for two administrative variances from the required 20-
foot front yard setback and the required 5-foot side yard setback in the R-8 zone (RMC 4-2-110A).
The request is for a front yard setback ranging from approximately 3-feet to approximately 9-feet and
a side yard setback of 2-feet, 6-inches along the south property line.
7) Administrative Variances: The applicant's administrative variance submittal materials comply with the
requirements necessary to process a vari�rncc. The applicant's site plan and other- project drawings are
provided as Exhibits 2 through 4.
8) The setback regulations for the suh.ject site arc covered under RMC 4-2-1 10A. The R-8 zone requires
a 20-foot front yard setback and a 5400t side yard setback for attached accessory structures.
9) The analysis of the proposal according to v�iriance criteria is found in the body of the staff report.
10) The total project site is approximately 12,900 square feet; 3,000 square feet of this site are located
landward of the waterline. The proposed carport (350 square feet) in addition to the existing house
and garage (1,313 square feet) on site %vould amount to 55.4% lot coverage of the landward portion of
the property and approximately 13% ot' the total site. Maximum lot coverage in the R-8 zone on lots
greater than 5,000 square feet is a maximum of 35% or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. The
subject site is 12,960 square feet in sire find, therefore, the proposal is within the lot coverage
requirement.
11) The neighboring property owners to) the south of the subject site have provided a comment letter
(Exhibit 6) and contend that the proposed carport would be too close to their property line at 2-feet 6-
inches, that the 17 foot height of the propo,;cd carport would impact the amount of light entering their
house, and that the existing foundation on w liich the carport would be built is inadequate.
12) Because the project site has an existing one -car garage, the addition of a one -car carport would still
satisfy the requirement (RMC 4-4-0I 01 1 tic) oCtwo on -site parking spaces.
13) Certificate of Exemption from Shorclinc Su1)Stantial Development Permit: The applicant's request
qualifies for a Shoreline Exemption and complies with the requirements of RMC 4-9-19007.
Construction by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or
for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade
level and which meets all requirements of the State agency or local government having jurisdiction.
Single family residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including
those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance.
An appurtenance is necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of a single family residence and is
located landward of the ordinary high water mark_
.4dwinisfrative Variance Report LUA08-071, SINK, 1'-.1, t .L doc
City of Renton Deprmvrrrew of CommmmritY & Economic IXTL'L)y' xW 1f 4d177ini5FrcuiLe VCrriWICe Report cti Decision
FLYNNSETBACK i!ARIAACES LUA08 071, SMC. FA. VA
.lucre ?, 2009 Pq-,e 4 of'S
E. Consistency with Variance Criteria
The applicant is requesting two variances. Onc is it variance for a side yard setback and the other is for a front
yard setback. RN1C 4-9-250135 lists four criteria that the Reviewing Official is asked to consider, along with
all other relevant information, in making rt decision on an Administrative Variance application. The four
criteria are:
a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special
circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to
deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the
vicinity and under identical zone classification:
The applicant contends that special circumstances apply to the subject site which imposes undue
limitations. The subject site is a developed 3.000 square foot parcel which slopes downward from cast
to west from Ripley Lane North to l,iikc 1,';i.-shiiigton. The existing single family residence is located
landward of an existing concrete bulkhead with access to the existing one -car garage and open
concrete parking pad from street level ,fong Ripley Lane North. The applicant believes that because of
the proximity of the site to Lake Wi- ,;Iunt,tou and the narrowness (approximately 35 feet) of the lot,
additional on -site parking in any other location is precluded. The applicant contends that neighboring
properties have similar parking which is accessible from the public right-of-way.
The applicant also contends that the siic and topography of the subject property precludes the location
of a carport addition elsewhere on the site. 0I lrer property owners in the immediate vicinity have two
and three -car garages. The proposed �iddition would allow the applicant to have three covered parking
spaces (one in the existing garage and i o in the proposed carport addition).
1) Side Yard Setback Variance
Staff agrees that the size and topography prevent construction elsewhere on the site. However,
because the subject site has enough room for two covered parking spaces without the necessity of a
side yard variance, staff believes that dic applicant does not suffer an undue hardship. Staff believes
that a reduction in the size of the proposal carport would still provide the applicant with two covered
parking spaces (a minimum of two parking spaces is required per RMC 4-4-080F10e). Staff
recommends that that the proposed carport be reduced in size to accommodate a 9-foot wide parking
space as measured from the south Nvall (it' the existing garage. Such a reduction in the size of the
proposed carport would preclude the ncccssil_y of'a side yard setback variance. Staff believes that such
a one car carport could be designed so that it would not encroach into the required 5-Foot side yard
setback. Therefore staff does not support tic ,ranting of the side yard setback variance.
2) Front Yard Setback Variance
The applicant currently parks vehicles c}ii a lead in the area which is proposed to be covered by a
carport structure. Because of the siic anti topography of the site, staff believes that a variance from
the required 20-foot front yard setback would be necessary in order to construct a carport on the
subject property. Staff recommends that (tie proposed carport structure be reduced in size to
accommodate a single 9-foot wide Markin+, space as measured from the south wall of the existing
garage. Therefore staff believes that the applicant has adequately demonstrated hardship for the front
yard variance.
Adnunistrati ve Variance Report LLA08-07I, SIC, !'-A. I'-, I..r(uc
Ca)' cx/'Rewan Depurmicrit o1'('oti2mw iiY & Economic Dc ivlopuenl
FLY:VrVSETBACK VARI: LACES
'hole 2, 2009
b.
C.
Adaiaiiristraliw Ycarkiucr Rcpori h Decision
Lt1'.408-1)'1. 5;bIC, t`-.l. tl_j
ro,'-e° ? of n
That the granting of the variance NNill not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property
is situated:
The applicant believes that the >ranting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the propcily or improvements in the vicinity and zone in that the
proposed carport would provide additional off-street parking which would be consistent with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Comments from the abutting property ow-rrcrs to the south of the subject property have been received.
Those owners state that they believe that the proposed carport structure would be closer to their
property line than the 24cet, 6-inches indicated on the site plan submitted by the applicant. The
Building Code requires a 3-foot sclximtlon between structures and the side property line. The
applicant indicates the carport support post would be 3-feet from the property line with a 6-inch roof
overhang. This proposal mecls Building Code requirements. The abutting property owners believe
that the proposed 17-foot height of the carport roof would significantly impact the amount of light
entering their home. They further contend that the foundation of the existing concrete pad on which
the proposed carport would be constructed is not adequate.
1) Side Yard Setback Variance
Staff believes that granting of the Sidi; yard setback variance may be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which it is
situated because the height of the proposed carport and its proximity to the southerly property line
would limit natural light from entcrin,,j the residence to the south_ Staff would support the new carport
addition if it is reduced in size to ,icconmiodate one car. A carport which would be constructed to
accornrnodate a Moot wide parking space as measured from the south wall of the existing garage
would preclude the necessity of varia ice from the required 5-foot side yard setback. Therefore staff
does not support granting of the side yard setback variance.
2) Front Yard Setback Variance
Staff believes that the granting of a variance from the 20-font front yard setback requirement would
not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the
vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated, provided the variance approval is
conditioned so that the carport Structure is reduced in size to accommodate a 9-foot wide parking
space as measured from the south wz311 of the existing garage. 'Therefore, based on such conditional
approval, staff is supportive of the front yard setback variance.
That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation
upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated:
The applicant contends that approval of the proposed side yard setback and front yard setback variance
requests would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other
properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Other properties in the
vicinity and zone in which the property is situated have two and three car garages.
1 Side Yard Setback Variance
Staff believes the approval of the \ iriaricc request may be a grant of special privilege. If the proposed
project is reduced to a one -car carport, a variance from the 5-foot side yard setback requirements
would not be necessary. The subject property currently has a orrc-car garage; a one -car carport would
give the applicant an opportunity to Iravc two covered parking spaces with additional storage area
which would be consistent with other 1_rroperty owners in the neighborhood. Therefore staff is not
supportive of the side yard setback variance.
Admiau amlisve Variamn c Report LU,108-071, SMC, f" A. fA.aloc
01Yo.fRervon Department ofCommunity & Economi, lh trinjriii�rrt
FLY,,VIV SFTRAC'K VARIANCES
,hare 2. 2009
2) Front Yard Setback Variance
Admonstratire 1,"arrrmcc Reporr & Decision
L11.108-071, SAIL V-A, V_/1
I'a��r fi of cY
Staff believes that the granting of a tiariance from the 20-foot front yard setback requirement would
not provide the applicant with special prig itc,Tc inconsistent with the limitation on other properties in
the vicinity or zone. Other propertics Hi the vicinity and zone have two and three car garages; the
proposed project if reduced to a one car carport structure would allow the applicant to have two
covered parking spaces with additional storage consistent with other property owners in the
neighborhood. Other carport rcqucsls under similar circumstances would likely be granted_
Therefore, staff is supportive of the front yard setback variance.
d. That the approval as determined bN the Planning Director is a minimum variance that will
accomplish the desired purpose:
The applicant contends that the rcclucst to reduce the side yard and front yard setbacks are the
minimum variance needed in order to prov[dc off-street covered parking.
1) Side Yard Setback Variance
Staff believes that the minimum tiari,111C;e would be a one -car carport which does not encroach into the
side yard setback. The reductions of the carport request to a one -car carport would provide the
applicant with two covered parking spaces and would be consistent with the current character of the
residential neighborhood in which it exists. Therefore staff is not supportive of the side yard setback
variance.
21 Front Yard Setback Variance
Staff supports a reduction in the front ,'ard setback in order to accommodate a one car carport
F. Conclusions
1 _ The requested variances encompass the reduction of the front yard setback from 20-feet to between
approximately 3-feet and approximatcly 94cet and the reduction of the side yard setback along the
south property line from 5--feet to 2-feet, 6-inches for the construction of a carport addition in
association with an existing single family residence as depicted on Exhibits 2 through 4,
2. Reduction of the proposed carport to i one -car carport which would accommodate a 9-foot wide
parking space as measured from the south Vat[ of the existing garage would preclude the necessity of a
variance from the 5-Foot side yard setback requirement.
3. The proposed Side Yard Setback Vririance (Variance I) for a two -car carport does not meet the four
criteria to be considered in makin<_, a decision on a variance request as specified in RMC 4-9-25QB5.
Because the site could accommodate two covered parking spaces without the necessity of a side yard
setback variance: special circumstances do not apply to the subject site which impose undue
limitations on the property; the granting, of the variance may be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject
property is situated; the granting of the variance would constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitation upon use of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the
subject property is situated; and, approval would not be the minimum variance necessary to
accomplish the desired purpose.
4. The proposed Front Yard Setback Variance (Variance 2) for a carport meets the four criteria to be
considered in snaking a decision on a variance request as specified in RMC 4-9-250B5 if the proposed
two car carport is reduced in size to a one car carport. Special circumstances apply to the subject site
which impose undue limitations on the property; the granting of the variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vanity and zone
Adminisurrthve Variance Repon LUA08-071, i'MC, f -A 1-..1-doc
Ciis- of Renlon Department of Community & Ecwwmw lk c-ii�pnww
FL.YNNSCTBACK iARJAN IFS
,erne 2. �009 --
Admim.stratire Farhmce Report c& Decision
U,'.408-071, WC, ILA, V-A
Pare 7 of '8
in which the subject property is situated; the granting of the variance does not constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon use of other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which the subject property is situated; anti. the approval would be the minimum variance necessary
to accomplish the desired purpose.
5. Staff recommends denial of the Side Yard Setback Variance based on the analysis contained in the
staff report because it is not consistent with dic four variance criteria specified in RMC 4-9-250B5.
6. Staff recommends approval of the Front Yard Setback with conditions based on the analysis contained
in the staff report because it is consistent with the tour criteria specified in RMC 4-9-25t7B5.
G. Decision
The Administrative Side Yard Setback Vrtrianee for the Hynn Setback Variances, File iYo. LUA08-071,
S147E, V A, V-A is denied.
The Administrative Front Yard Setback Variance for the Flynn Setback Variances, File 1Vo. LUA08-071,
S,VE,, V-A, V-A is approved subject to the, followin; conditions:
1. The carport addition shall be redesigned to accommodate one 9-foot wide parking space. This
redesigned carport shall not encroach into the side yard setback.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating a one parking space carport which
maintains a minimum 5-foot side yard setback from the southerly property line of the subject
site. This revised site plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division project manager prior to
building permit issuance.
SIGNATURE:
E
C.E Vincent, Planning Director
TRANSWITTFD this 2'"t day- gfJune, 2009 io thc Our�er/Applicunt/Cvr7tcrct:
Matt Flynn Jim Brandt
5301 Ripley Lane North Brandt Design Services
Renton, WA 98056 P.O. Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 99391
TRAiVS,W1TTED this 2"`i dery of June, 2009 to the Parties of Record.
Ju7nes & Cindv Haase
5227 Ripliv Lanc ,'Forth
Renton. PV4 98056
Admirristratire VarianceRepor•t LU.408-071, WC, V-A. V-.I.Joc
- (' (?- /t C' -
Decision Date
Cits-nf Rcrrlotr iJporlencn? rxf C'unrnrrnrifr: X h_carruruic O rrlotmwnt
FL t; "A" SETSACK VARIANCES
Jtme ?, 2009
TIi I!V&VITLED lhis "" daY of June 2009 to the lirfloit-ing:
Larry Mcckling, Building Official
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer I lensing, Current Planning Manager
Kayren Kittrick. Plan Review Supervisor
Fire Marshal
Renton Reporter
,°ldministralive Varirrnct' Rcpon & lkuc wort
LU,408-071, SaIC, V-.d, V-A
Per,=r h uJ��Y
Land Use Action Request for Reconsideration, Appeals & Expiration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within fourteen (14) days
of the effective date of decision,
RECONSIDERATION: Within fourteen (14) days of the effective date of decision, any party may request
that a decision may be reopened by the Administrator (Decision -maker). The Administrator (Decision -maker)
may modify his decision if material evidence nol readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or
if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. Alter review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator
(Decision -maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of
the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal
timcframc.
APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the
Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on June 16, 2009. An appeal of the decision must be filed
within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional infbrnzation regarding the appeal
process may be obtained f:ronI the Renton City Clcrk's office, Renton City Hall — 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510,
Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the r'cLluired S75.00 application fee to: hearing Examiner, City
of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. %VA 9S05 7.
THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex party (private one-on-one)
communications may occur concerning the land use decision. Tlie Doctrine applies not only to the initial
decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing I xaminer as well. All communications after the decision approval
date must be made in writing through the I Icaring Examiner. All communications are public record and this
permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut
the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the
Court.
EXPIRATION: The variance approval will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A variance one -(I)
year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B.17.
Administrative Variance Report LU,408-071, SMC, V-a, V-L.rtuc
EXHIBIT 2
:9
LA
0
r
2
5-9
,q�
.O ; CZ 1 . d
S L S.
c i v i l-i �1`ti n 45
>
1.
A
LL
A 4
d
d
7
o
° Q
J
�
T �
DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF FEWMI
0 C T ; 5 2,33
RECEIVED
h
U:
LJ�
EXHIBIT 3
I
1 r
J �
h
Y
V ]
[ tl
0
[_
L
Lu
uj
Q
EXHIBIT 4
wry
J
0.
,
A4 - 20 T24N R5E W 1/2
EXHIBIT 5 1
s L-re
�w
F CA -
8E 75rh St
COR
OCR(CA
c�
E
C NE 44y, St
N
Yee
b CA
w
a
CQR NE43 St it
CA
C4 - 32 T24N R5E W 1/2
sq
t S 0 200 400
t
ZONING `}
,�. ; MTKIINICALSERVICES IY 'ram J Feet
,, �~ 07f15/08 14.800
B4
29 T24N R5E W 1/2
5429
11
EXHIBIT 6
April 15, 2009
Gerald Wasser
Associate Planner
Department of Community & Economic Development
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: Project Name/Number: Flynn Setback Variances/I.UA0S-071, V-A, V-A, SME
Mr. Wasser,
CITY Or- RENTON
RECEIVED
APR 15 2099
BUILDING DIVISION
We are providing comments in response to the "Notice of Application" submitted by our next door
neighbor Matt Flynn. His project involves building a carport over an existing parking pad which he has
indicated on his application is 2.5 feet from the property line between our properties. He is asking for a
variance because the rule for building structures is that they be 5 feet from the property line.
While the parking structure at the street may be close to 2.5 feet from the property line, the southwest
corner of the structure rests on, or is in very close proximity to, the property line between our homes so
a carport structure would be built partially on the property line; not 23 feet from it. It is for this reason
that we feel responsible to comment that the information he provided in his application for variance is
incorrect and we request action be taken on the part of the City of Renton to deny his application.
It is our understanding that in addition to the "5-foot" rule it is a fire code requirement that 2.5 feet
exist between a building structure and the property line and approval of this request would not meet
that requirement. In addition, we need to protect the value of our property and do what we can to
ensure that our neighbors are not granted exceptions to the rules that will negatively affect the value of
our property. We also question the integrity of the foundation of the existing parking pad in that it is
constructed only of a stack of cinder blocks and a couple metal posts. Allowing him to build a 1.7-foot
high structure that is merely 5 feet from our home would significantly impact the light that currently
enters our home on that side and a potential hazard to our house if it collapsed. We also feel it could
potentially be an issue for the resale of our home in years to come.
As neighbors, we don't feel it should be our responsibility to turn in our neighbor for not providing the
City with accurate information in his application. Rather that should be between the City and the
person requesting the variance; in this case Matt Flynn. When Matt built onto his house a couple years
ago he had a Survey done that clearly marked the property line at the street and at the water's edge. If
you mark the straight line from one point to the other you will clearly see that the southwest corner of
the parking pad is on, or perhaps inches from, the property line, not 2.5 feet from it. As this is not
consistent with the information he provided in his application we are requesting the City of Renton take
one of the following actions:
I. Deny his request for variance as said southwest corner of parking pad is not 2.5 feet from the
property line or,
2. Visit the property and take the measurement to confirm or deny that it meets the requirement
We have asked the contractor/project contact person listed on the Notice of Application, Jim Brandt, to
provide us with a copy of the plans to show us that it is 2.5 feet from the southwest corner to the
property line or a copy of the Survey which he says also shows that measurement. While he indicated
he would provide it, we've received nothing from either the contractor, nor has the owner of the home
made any attempt to communicate with us regarding this project. Unfortunately that puts us in the
position of writing this correspondence in an effort to protect the value of our home.
Please take this into consideration in determining whether to grant his request. We feel it is important
that in situations like ours where our neighbor does not provide accurate data on his application, the
City of Renton require adherence in effort of maintaining everyone's property value and safety.
Because our properties are so close together, we feel the 5 foot rule should apply in this situation, not
2.5, and certainly not inches if there are any. If he were to provide the City of Renton with a new design
that resulted in adherence to the building code allowing 5 feet from his carport to the property line we
would be supportive of his efforts to enhance the value of his property.
We are hopeful that you will agree that constructing a building that partially lies on our property line is
not acceptable. However, if his request to construct a carport is approved, please let us know what
further action we may take with the City of Renton to appeal.
Thank you,
I}r
V
James and Cindy Huse l
5227 Ripley Lane N
Renton, WA 98056
425-204-2092
As noted on the Application Notice we would like to be made a party of record to receive further
information on this proposed project.
EXHIBIT 7
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D ��� � � J�``,l N.
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ((�}�
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
LAND USE ACTION FILE NO
PROJECT NAME::
PROJECT MANAGER:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
CONTACT (if other than Owner):
June 2, 2009
Flynn Setback Variances
LUADS-071, SME, V-A, V-A
Gerald C. Wasser
Matt Flynn
5301 Ripley Lane
Renton, WA 98056
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION. The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of
Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
for the construction of a carport in association with a single
family residence on a 3,000 square foot site. The applicant
states that the proposed carport would cover an existing
parking pad and would be 17 feet in height. Access to the
proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N. The
proposed project would take place approximately 70-feet
from the existing bulkhead which is the Ordinary High
Water Line (OHWL). Staff has recommended that the
proposed project be reduced in size to accommodate a one
parking space carport. All work would take place on the
landward side of the bulkhead.
PROJECT LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NE QUARTER SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E
SEC-TWN-R: 29 T24N R5E
WATER BODY/WETLAND: Lake Washington
An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted
on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4-9-190.C.7 and/or for the following reason(s);
XX Pursuant to RMC4-9-190.C.7, construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or
contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his
family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade.
Single family residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by
one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous
ownership which are a normal appurtenance. Construction authorized under this
exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark.
The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one):
CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
® Policies of the Shoreline Management Act.
N/A ❑ The guidelines of the Department of Ecology
where no Master Program has been finally
approved or adapted by the Department.
® The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program.
[For Exhibit Only — Not For Signature]
C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director
Planning Division
Attachments: A. Zoning Map
B. Site Plan
C. East and South Elevations and Upper and Lower Floor Plans
D. North Elevation and Roof Framing Plan
cc: Owner/Applicant
Contact
City of Renton Official File
A4 - 20 T24N R5E W 1/2
S LT1E
COR
ya.
-'
�...........CA..
�pi
6
SE 761h S[
caR
E
n NE44Ms,
SN
d� v
��g s CA 1
COR NE43MS
AlCA'
C4 - 32 T24N R5E W 1/2
13
+ E� ZONING* _1 n 200 400
h PPI'"TECHNICAL5ERN'ICES Feet
r�'_ ,• 07/15108 �,-0 1AWD
B4
29 T24N R5E W 1/2
5429
I
LA
1j1H0
I
,a?
w
f
Z s m
` 0
r`
a
f
1 �
tA
� tim
d �r
.a- L2 •6 ,� 7QQ L
CLUELOPMEN7
1 CITY OF FJFNTOF i
RECEIVED
N-r
I
c y
LL
cr-
z2,
f'
CLL fV
LL
io
lAILL i
r•
.i°
3
5--
C
Q H UJ
L j E, cr
W
C3
d
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:raff,
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: Jerry Wasser
PROJECT TITLE: Flynn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA
U RK ORDER NO: 77927
PLEASE RETURN TO�ERRY WASSER I"URRENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applic nt is requesting approval a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction a carport in association a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-fee required and a yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. Thep project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would Le from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
water
Plants
_
LandlShoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housirt
Aesthetics
Li ht/Glere
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
ip_Opd Feet
14.000 Feet
n (�
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional informa¢err isrryeeded to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
U
April 15, 2009
Gerald Wasser
Associate Planner
Department of Community & Economic Development
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: Project Name/Number: Flynn Setback Variances/LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
Mr. Wasser,
CITY OF RENTON
RECEIVED
APR 15 2009
BUILDING DIVISION
We are providing comments in response to the "Notice of Application" submitted by our next door
neighbor Matt Flynn. His project involves building a carport over an existing parking pad which he has
indicated on his application is 2.5 feet from the property line between our properties. He is asking for a
variance because the rule for building structures is that they be 5 feet from the property line.
While the parking structure at the street may be close to 2.5 feet from the property line, the southwest
corner of the structure rests on, or is in very close proximity to, the property line between our homes so
a carport structure would be built partially on the property line; not 2.5 feet from it. It is for this reason
that we feel responsible to comment that the information he provided in his application for variance is
incorrect and we request action be taken on the part of the City of Renton to deny his application.
It is our understanding that in addition to the "5-foot" rule it is a fire code requirement that 2.5 feet
exist between a building structure and the property line and approval of this request would not meet
that requirement. In addition, we need to protect the value of our property and do what we canto
ensure that our neighbors are not granted exceptions to the rules that will negatively affect the value of
our property. We also question the integrity of the foundation of the existing parking pad in that it is
constructed only of a stack of cinder blocks and a couple metal posts. Allowing him to build a 17-foot
high structure that is merely 5 feet from our home would significantly impact the light that currently
enters our home on that side and a potential hazard to our house if it collapsed. We also feel it could
potentially be an issue for the resale of our home in years to come.
As neighbors, we don't feel it should be our responsibility to turn in our neighbor for not providing the
City with accurate information in his application. Rather that should be between the City and the
person requesting the variance; in this case Matt Flynn. When Matt built onto his house a couple years
ago he had a Survey done that clearly marked the property line at the street and at the water's edge. If
you mark the straight line from one point to the other you will clearly see that the southwest corner of
the parking pad is on, or perhaps inches from, the property line, not 2.5 feet from it. As this is not
consistent with the information he provided in his application we are requesting the City of Renton take
one of the following actions:
1. Deny his request for variance as said southwest corner of parking pad is not 2.5 feet from the
property fine or,
2. Visit the property and take the measurement to confirm or deny that it meets the requirement
We have asked the contractor/project contact person listed on the Notice of Application, Jim Brandt, to
provide us with a copy of the plans to show us that it is 2.5 feet from the southwest corner to the
property line or a copy of the Survey which he says also shows that measurement. While he indicated
he would provide it, we've received nothing from either the contractor, nor has the owner of the home
made any attempt to communicate with us regarding this project. Unfortunately that puts us in the
position of writing this correspondence in an effort to protect the value of our home.
Please take this into consideration in determining whether to grant his request. We feel it is important
that in situations like ours where our neighbor does not provide accurate data on his application, the
City of Renton require adherence in effort of maintaining everyone's property value and safety.
Because our properties are so close together, we feel the 5 foot rule should apply in this situation, not
2.5, and certainly not inches if there are any. if he were to provide the City of Renton with a new design
that resulted in adherence to the building code allowing 5 feet from his carport to the property line we
would be supportive of his efforts to enhance the value of his property.
We are hopeful that you will agree that constructing a building that partially lies on our property line is
not acceptable. However, if his request to construct a carport is approved, please let us know what
further action we may take with the City of Renton to appeal.
Thank you,
James and Cindy Huse l
5227 Ripley Lane N
Renton, WA 98056
425-204-2092
As noted on the Application Notice we would like to be made a party of record to receive further
information on this proposed project.
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEW#NG DEPARTMENT: L� COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
CITY OF
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009 R E Q E I V F 0
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn PLANNER: Jerry Wasser A n , tk . q;'i C1 it
PROJECT TITLE: Flynn Setback Variances
SITE AREA: 3,000
LOCATION: 5301
re feet
Lane N
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/PUILDIN
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (cross) N/A
WORK ORDER NO. 77927
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport vwouid be from Rip#ey Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e_g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
!tams
Land/Shoreline Use
Animais
Environmental Health
Enercgy1
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
u/
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housin
Aesthctics
Li hl,'Glare
Recreation
utfiities
Transportation
Puuiic Services
Nistmic/Cuitural
Preservation
Airport Fnwronmertt
fo, 000 Feet
14,000 Fcot
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probabie impact or
areas where dditional information is n9yded to properly assess this proposal.
of Director or 4h6rizk Represe
G
Date
City of Renton Departmery of Community & Fconomic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:,
COMMENTS DICE: APRIL 15, 2009
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: Jerry Wasser
PROJECT TITLE: Flynn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA
WORK ORDER NO: 77927
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
Marc
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Fnvironmentat Healtti
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C_ CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Nousirt
Aesthetics
Li htlGlare
Recreation
utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10.000 Fect
14.000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pay-k-
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: Jerry Wasser
PROJECT TITLE Flynn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick O/
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
LXISTING BLDG AREA (gross)7 NIA t/ 9K, 'f
LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NIA
WORK ORDER NO: 7
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline SubV&tial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport it association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
water
Plants
Larid/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy,'
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housin
Aesthetics
Light/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Trans port ation
Public Services
Historicicujturai
Preservation
Airport Enviromrerit
10,006 Feet
14,000 Feet
�
c, et at,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where add' anal information is needed to property assess this proposal
Signature of Director or AuthorizedFRepreserftative Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P164 Rifvov `,
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009 aWOFREi+f�OT�
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: Jerry Wasser
PROJECT TITLE: Flynn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick APR 0 2099
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA BUILDING DIVISION
LOCATION: 5301 Ri le Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA
WORK ORDER NO: 77927
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
--
Earth
—
Air
Water
giants
LaridlShureiirie Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energyl
Natural Resources
k) 0-- �_
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
10 ,,�.
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesfhetics
Li htlGlare
Recreation
Utaities
Transportation
Public Servic&s
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
1 D, OQD Feel
14.00 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas m which we have expertise and have identified areas of probabfe impact or
areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal.
Sig t e of birector or Authorized Representative Date(
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT;-,:..� _. I
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A. SME
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: JerryWasser CITY OFRENTON
PROJECT TITLE FI nn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
APR 0 t 2009
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NIpBUILDING DIVISION
_
WORK ORDER NO: 77927
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would he from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
plants
Land/Shoreiine Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy)
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Nousin
Aesthetics
Li ht/Giare
Recreation
Utilities
Transporlation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10.000 Feet
14, 000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposai.
Director or Authorized Representative
D e
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: _(:)aClri'1 J C L
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 15, 2009
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SMF
BATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1, 2009
APPLICANT: Matt Flynn
PLANNER: Jerry Wasser
PROJECT TITLE: Flynn Setback Variances
PLAN REVIEWER: Ka ren Kittrick
SITE AREA: 3,000 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 5301 Ripley Lane N
PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA
WORK ORDER NO: 77927
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and Administrative Variances for
a 2-foot, 6-inch side yard setback where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which would vary from approximately 3-feet to
approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a 3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would be from Ripley Lane N.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
lmpacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Farih
Air
Wafer
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
11wronrnentai 1-ieafth
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li NIGiare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Servicws
Historir./Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
W.000 Feet
14,OGO Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposai.
Signature of rect or Authorized Representative ❑a4
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepk—'.,ilh Ute Deparintent of Community & Economic Development
ICE DI - Pianni ng Division of the City of Renton. The 4oilawing 1describes the application and the
necessary Public App—ais.
PROJECT NAMEINUMBER' F,.. ,. .,��f ;,t,a, i_ _: LLF.7&071. V- . V :. VJE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: - .. ::,-g a,.prcral of e Cerdicate a` Exem:lunn frrrn Shore'ine
5 hstar;.al pevelopment Pwr+n,I for Iha :-pnjt n a C-I i[h a s r+;lc fancesenre y rdana
nGrn rr slral Ye 'r ar'a-:ces ! r a 2-'001, a'!ere 5 fnel� s quived ani a fo .-1 set b3ct r ..
., ahr:
rid 3 'ro^1 approximately 31ec: to rf:t,.l, '.I fcr:: ,...are 20 fce1 is e', I pro Tl.o pocd p-,—t site is
CGG -;1care foot lot Aim the Residonl �,�f'- acre (R-8) zone ftr:r.ess 'o 'ne PrgP—..1I : rroort :roar
he Grim Ripiev Lard N
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS r. r::::preval and 5"nofahne. Faemphcn per-!
APPLICAHLPROJECT CONTACT PERSCr, .l n. k' .u:.. P: 1 0 1S—,: r-s: Tel +„53: UG-917a
Comments on the above pi mr.,t ho -I-I; tcd 1 writing 10 Gerald Wasser. Associate Planner,
Department of Community & Eco n o to is Do>:�1 -,meht 1055 Sc ulh Grady Way, RetllOn, WA 98057- by 5, P9 PM on
Apnl 15, 2009. p', J I-0- qn 10— 3h..,,f :' "'{�-':::.I h 1.:r he mace 3 pa`ly of re.-nrd :x�d re'ei:v additiana.
rcli`.cal�nn b m.il,ncort-r he Prclec! 1-73Y.1. �,r/ane N. .) ;Uh-CIS :•rr:tler con'1'«r'1= wll
ouioma:-oAlly beccme a Daily nl - -:d a�-: <.. . -':... ....a:ision o'r :his Pra;ec:
PLEASE INCLHDF THE PROJECT NUIVRFR WHLN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: JDIY 1. 2008
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 1. 2009
DATE OF NOTICE OI
..sold y: nea V•rn/'a re. r I, - 7 . ai,n on [h:.s [p"ed a•o =c nm,. .!. 1 s to t:,: �.
ret rr Io C.i:y r.f Rentor Cer:, Plano ad_ -AP on,I ?8Gn,
F IC td,: {-..nn So'bar.+'.,;vi.ir�'_i
raaadf _
tv,.ItInG zDDLRF.SS-
L. -PI IC1'_ NO
CERTIFICATION
T. hereby certify that cop] of the ab ive document
were posted by me to conspICUO is places or nearby t scrib er .�`•����� l�'4
DATE: cC SIGNED
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in s r % r
elf
on the 'DIi day of
` NOTARY PUBLIC. IGNATUR .!t
Ago •'
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 1st day of April, 2009, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Representing
Jim Brandt
Contact
Matt Flynn
OwnerlAppiicant
Surrounding Property Owners — NOA only
See Attached
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for 4t vmes�,�nd
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: 14�i<1D4
Notary Public in and fo a State:..of Washington
Nota Print . ' ;; . rq�'''�?�'-; _
My appointment expires: .; `�i 4c'"'"sstiti,...•.`'
Project Name: Flynn Setback Variances
Project Number: LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
292405900500
SNSF
PO BOX 961089
FORT WORTH TX 76161
334330279509
FLYNN MATTHEW P
5301 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330285001
IOPPOLO JOSEPH A
5201 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330274005
PIANTANIDA GREG+SHERRE
7011 RIPLEY LANR N
RENTON WA 98056
334330283006
DANA DONALD & PATRICIA A
5219 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330270003
GRUNDHAUS MARJORIE K.
7001 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330275002
LANG SUSAN E
7023 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330286009
SMITH SHARON M
5143 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330278006
DYE PATRICK
7029 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330280002
HUSE JAMES D+CYNTHIA A
5227 RIPLEY LN N
RENTON WA 98056
334330272009
MANZ OLAF P
7009 RIPLEY LN
RENTON WA 98055
t �*
t bil
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development
(CED) — Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Flynn Setback Variances i LUA08-071, V-A.. V-A. SMF
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is rcqucsting approval of a Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit for the the construction of a carport in association with a single family residence and
Administrative Variances for a 2 foot, 6-inch side yards sei`lack where 5-feet is required and a front yard set back which
would vary from approximately 3-feet to approximately 9-feet where 20-feet is required. The proposed project site is a
3,000 square foot lot within the Residential - 8 dwellin, units aer acre (R-8) zone. Access to the proposed carport would
be from Ripley Lane N.
PROJECT LOCATION: 5301 Ripley '_a ,e N
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Adrnin s:ratkye 'Variance approval and Shoreline Exemption permit
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: 'ins Brandt. Brandt Design Services: Tel (253) 826-9224
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner,
Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on
April 15, 2009. If you have questions ahout this pr%josal. cr wish to be rrrade a party of record and receive additional
notification by mail, contact the Project Mana<Jer Jt (4251 430-7382. Anyone who submits written comments will
automatically became a party of record and will he ichfied of �:ny decision cn this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: July 1, 2008
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 1, 2009
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: April 1. 2009
If you would like to he made a party of record to receve f_r;her information on this proposed project, complete this form
and return to: City of Renton. CED. Planning Division. 1 i)55 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
File Name I No Flynn Setback Variances r LUA08-071, V-A V-A, SP,1E
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.:
y
,r ^ Denis Law, Mayor
April 1, 2009
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
CIT') JF RENTON
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Subject: Notice of Complete Application
Flynn Setback Variances, LUA08-071, V-A, V-A, SME
Dear Mr. Brandt:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application
is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review.
You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your
application.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
X4 Cam, A�
Gerald C. Wasser
Associate Planner
cc: Matt Flynn / Owner(s)
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057
This paper conta'.ns 50=/ recyCed material, 301 past consumer
RENTON
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
Project Narrative
Matt l{lynn, 5301 Ripley Lane, Renton 98056 (3000 sit lot) . Shmeline
exemption and a variance for the sikleyard and front setbacks to t o m 6gure and
construct a roof over his existing; pat -king part. The entrance to the p7 irking pact
comes off Ripley Lane as it does now, and it creates two additional +.overed
parking spaces.
R-S 7Aning designation for this site .ind adjacent properties.
A single family waterfi-ont residence kvith existing dock and exi wl� = 1-laining wall
at the street.
The property slopes to Lake Washington with no soils clisturbamc p panned .
The total cost of this project is estimated at $20,000 and the fi- iIr + virket value is
estimated at $30,000.
There is no ground work or tree removal involved in this project.
The proposed project is 701t. away From the ordinary high water tir l k of Lake
Washington.
The property has an existing conc-reto bulkhead and concrete relaMing, walls.
The proposed project height is 170. from the average grade level -wd has no
structures behind that would be obstructed from views.
Justification for the variance request
The lots are extremely narrow that allows very little setback from V ilAcy Lane.
The existing footprints are no longer consistant with current setback regulations.
This proposal does not expand the current parking footprint. A varVi,wce allows
this homeowner to gain a covered off street parking. The limitation, of these
properties prevents the up -grading; of these residences and still comp l., with the
current setback regulations. The homeowner is asking, for a reasen,0110 useage
to match those of the existing neighbors,
The proposal as shown on the plans is to add a roof over the exististg parking
deck. The footprint of the structure does not change along Ripley 1:nne. There is
no impact on the shoreline as all work is confined to the opposito s;i,le of the
existing structure 7011 ftom the existing 'bulkhead.
•Ok
�y,9�'
cl\ SAS IF _i
0
Ri
J�
VI
v
r
ii
Y'
1. a
r
pp
jo•
Lhh
41
Q
0
r6
r
J
a v�o
RO "*
OCT
15 2008
RECEIVE
Wilf29l2008) ggrald Wasser - flynn-
ti� O
+
CITY OF RENTON
0
1055 S. GRADY
+ r
RENTON, WA 98055
(425) 43M897
DATE 07/29I2008
FLYNN INVESTMENT
5301 RIPLEY LANE N
RENTON, WA 98056
MAID �HEL KS PAYA6LE 'O THE GT' OF R@IT9N
ACCOUNT Na 3006
STATEMENT
ACCOUNT NO. 3006
0.00
AMOPNT ENCLO5
GATE
f+EF9RiENCE NO.
alP. ". DESCAIPTION
QV4RGES
BALANCE
—NEW CUSTOMER
07/1712008
15820
Miscellaneous
200.00
200.00
07/17/2008
15820
Miscellaneous
15.00
215.00
07/22/2008
082022010043
PAYMENT 15820
-215.00
0.00
PERIOD CLOSING DATE
07P2912006 cr'nRCE;swo cp�msM.ne,wTEa euNcoATswuApPew
ON NEXT STATEMENT
Please Remit to. CITY ORE N70N
1055 S GRADY WAY vao iurE�esrcuances��sc+u=*.rau uaaFP
RENTON. V+A 9£+055 �oHnar w.o-.wn ceMn.ucse n,car,�uT•,. ,.�..n
R.120 DAYS 01-120 DAYS :'6140 DAYS 37 50. i17iY$ CUARENT - - AWiCUNi OLl)"..
0.00 Mo o.ao 0.00 OX a.00
Y
�h penis Law, Mayor
N
August 1, 2008
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
Subject: Flynn Setback Variances
LUA08-071, VA -A, VA -A
Dear Mr. Brandt:
CIT- OF RENTON
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
After reviewing the materials submitted for the Flynn Setback Variances application,
staff has determined that the application is incomplete according to the City's submittal
requirements as outlined in RMC 4-8-120C. The following items are required to
accept the application as complete:
1. The Project Narrative you have submitted does not fully describe your proposed
project. It is not clear how access would be provided to the proposed covered
parking. There is no indication of how many covered parking spaces would be
created. Please submit 12 copies of a revised Project Narrative which
addresses these issues.
2. The Site Plan submitted with the application materials does not indicate how the
new parking space(s) would be oriented nor how it (they) would be accessed.
Please submit 12 copies of a revised Site Plan which shows this information.
Also, please indicate the scale of the Site Plan.
3. The Floor Plans and Elevations submitted with the application materials do not
indicate how access to the proposed new parking space(s) would be provided; it
appears that there is a fence/railing (indicated in your "Front Elevation") which
would block access to the newly proposed carport. Please submit 5 copies of
revised Floor Plans and Elevations which clearly show the proposed new
parking space(s) and back up space which are in compliance with the
dimensions specified in R117C 4-4-080. The revised Elevations should be
labeled with the direction in which they face. A north arrow should be
included with the Floor Plans.
4. Please note that Building Code regulations do not permit openings in walls closer
than 3 feet to a property line. Both the submitted Site Plan and Floor Plans
indicate that the proposed carport would be closer than 3 feet to the southerly
property line. You are advised to discuss this matter with a representative of
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057
0 This paper cormins 50°-� rerycled material, 30% post consumer
RENTON
AHEAD OF THE CURVE -
the Development Services Division before revising the Site Plan, Floor Plans
and Elevations.
The proposed project qualifies as exempt from the Shoreline Permit System.
However, RMC 4-9-190D requires that any person claiming exemption from the
permit requirements of the Shoreline Master Program shall make application for a
no -fee exemption certificate. Enclosed are the Submittal Requirements,
Shoreline Exemption. An application for a Certificate of Exemption from
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be submitted.
Once the above requested information is received, review of your application will begin.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions.
Sinc Y.
erald asser
Associate Planner
Enclosure: Submittal Requirements, Shoreline Exemption
cc: Matt Flynn/Owner. .
Jennifer Henning
.,n
Denis Law, Mayor
July 25, 2008
Jim Brandt
Brandt Design Services
PO Box 7785
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
Subject: Flynn Setback Variances
LUA08-071, VA -A, VA -A
Dear Mr. Brandt:
CITV OF RENTON
lrepartment of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
It has come to our attention that the check submitted to cover the application fee for the
above -captioned project was not accepted for payment by the drawee bank. Therefore,
staff has determined that the Flynn Setback Variances application is incomplete
according to the City's submittal requirements as outlined in RMC 4-8-120C.
Upon receipt of the payment of the appropriate application fees and handling
charges, staff will review all of the submitted application materials to determine
completeness. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions.
Sin y,
erald C. as er
Associate Planner
cc: Matt. Flynn/Owner
Jennifer Henning
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057
® This paper contains 54% recydedrnaterial,301% post consumer -
RENTON
AHEAD 4F T14F CURVE
0
City/ of Renton��
LAND USE PERMITo''J�%.
MASTER APPLICATION z
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME:
ADDRESS:
3C.t M,I LA
CITY: ZIP:
Jia 9 i6 n s
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ZS-ZZ-i -,(�c3
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME:
lit- 0 V T
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
i� o ti3 b X
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER
CONTACT PERSON
NAME:
COMPANY (if applicado .
�TC.A� i►.] ti7 ~p"'. �s. �;�"� i Ca+J S �R.ti! i GE''S
ADDRESS:. y 7� :;.
CITY: ZIP:
Teo NN"
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
-2-s 3- 8 Z 6 - 9 'zt- 4
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)JLOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
5, 10 1 T[, r p M-11 (— Is',-N Zr
IZ,t - o a, W A 9 8 (,) S-)6
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
EXISTING LAND USE(S):
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
5 i" s
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
5 —
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable):
SAt�ks"
EXISTING ZONING; —
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
SITE AREA (in square feet): -3 d n n
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable):
N/A
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): N
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable):
PIA
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
N A
Q:1WEBlPW1DEVSERV1Forms\Planninglmasterapp.doc08/29/03
PRIDECT INFORMA
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
CD&-xV—
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL_
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable):
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N A
TION contin
PROJECT VALUE: -% M Or 0
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (f applicable):
❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA
sq. ft.
❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD
sq. ft.
❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION
sq. ft.
g SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
SWI rLE sq. ft.
❑ WETLANDS
sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information included
SITUATE IN THE NC- QUARTER OF SECTION Z-`3 , TOWNSHIP '?-9, RANGE 5', IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. 'i pv - KVLV v AR.i P aJ u: 3.
mortar rr 4 oA'o V Ar7t. r W-3
2. L c x �U," 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Namels) declare that I am (please check one) current owner of the property
involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein twined and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowled and belief.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that P F6�q ki
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/herltheir free and volu act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
A , milt, I
It
Notary Public in and for the St of Wash ton do u C
i 'P GRIIG
(Signature of Owner/Representative) _ "
.( f�j1:2t N� C � �� ��, t, .
Notary (Print)_ . _ . _ . _ �
My appointment expires: 0---.y— /g
Q:1WEB\P W\DEVSERV\Forms\Planninglmasterapp_doc06l29103
Project Narrative
Matt Flynn, 5301 Ripley Lane, Renton 98056 (3000 sft Iot)
variance for sideyard and front setbacks.
R-8 zoning designation for this site and adjacent properties.
A single family waterfront residence with existing dock and existing retaining wall
at the street.
The property slopes to Lake Washington with no soils disturbance planned for this
second story addition and garage renovation.
The total cost of this project is estimated at $20,000 and the fair market value is
estimated at $30,000.
There is no ground work or tree removal involved in this project.
The proposed project is 251 away from the ordinary high water marls of Lake
Washington.
The property has an existing concrete bulkhead and concrete retaining walls.
The proposed project height is 17ft. from the average grade level and has no
structures behind that would be obstructed born views.
Justification for the variance request
The lots are extremely narrow that allows very little setback from Ripley Lane.
The existing footprints are no longer consistant with current setback regulations.
This proposal does not expand the current parking footprint. A variance allows
this homeowner to gain a covered off street parking. The limitations of these
properties prevents the up -grading of these residences and still comply with the
current setback regulations. The homeowner is asking for a reasonable useage
to match those of the existing neighbors.
T':e proposal as shown on the plans is to add a roof over the existing parking
deelc. The footprint of the struetiue does not change along Ripiev Lane.
i
91(
o �z
4 G + % Z
tzl
I
�
�
N
w
(.
.Q y'(pa9
Zl
M y t-G1
2
00
w
K
tea❑ 9�.�1-Six,
,o , C.Z I ,4-,9
,SL-SF
x
14
r
tio12
N
o
:r
w
2
r 0
t
r
Y1
6A
.�
N
Q
�
0
0
0
Cl
a
ar
r
7
�
s
�
I
t
_I
J
�
r
�
=5
SE 64th
Ln
St,
65Ah Sff
SE
>11
tj
7:0
�SE68th
R-8
NE 50th St.
CA {%
NE48 t. SE 76th�'St.
;
SE �76th PI
SE 77th Pl.
ILA
FC4 43rd�
SE 80th St.
OAR
N
ZONING B4
PMW T%CIMCJ%L.U]IVH=
l%rUVO4 29 T24N R5E E 1/2
5429
ZONING MAP BQC
92 93 , 4455 456 459
461
B-4- i B , 13,_,2 .::..
M:
2OT2+4N R4E 25 U2 N R4E- . 3p T24N R5E �q T24i R5E' �0.�4h RSE: , 27,T24N.R5E.- 28 T24N f25E •,
$ f 94W 4551 v E457 r 458 AfiO� _ti _
" 464 i
1 C2 C C:4 mC j7
::i■ iv+
3$ t24AlR4E 36 724N NE 31 T24N R5E 32 T24N R5E` 35 1Ie4N R5E
6 307 �� 08 309 3 f 8. r Q1
_. ;. ,J
;
D3 'D4 t , 7�_5
C7
�.,� .
3Si'R4E' 1 �1(34E a ' T23N R5E 8 T23NR5E 4 T23n1RSE 3 123N R5 .2 T23iV RSE \
b1-6 $06
319
7
_E4
TXR4B, , .1 �W-a G ` 23ti 425E s.; $T23N RSE ' 3 E29i 1 RSE ( tr 10 Y23N `R> 4 t AFR5E
27 370
3-, '. +1 4k:: 1 B T23N, R5E •. 17 T23N R5E {96 T231;R5E~ 1' ,T23N R5E. E 14 it23N' R51_ -" 1.
` } � ,335 336 337` y: 371 4 `� 6�17
— g'16
s G-7
T23N R$E
24 T23hi R4E r � 19 T231<} RSE, , 5 . ` 2a :r2aN FiS3tV��?-"; ;- - 22 T23N TiSE�-�:`" 23 T23N RSE 2
44 p $ 600 :: 601 662 `� t rf j, 0 t ,. 21
- 1 f6 7
T23N R4E, 25?f23 i R4E 30'T23NR5E" :."29, 23N R5E 2BT23N 05E 2�T23t1:R5E 2fi T2317ft5��.'r 25
50 $51.,E r,.
603 r 6 4 605' 825 826- 8
H5 H
. I—
Ij3 �- .14
38 t23N R4E 31 T23VJ RSE: 32T23N RSE 33 T23N R a 'T23N RSE 35 T23N RSE 36
60,7; _. 608! 609 610 632 833 ■
� -... J -J
J4_J .
N R4E N R4E 1 6 T22N R5E'. " 5 -r 2# R5E 4 i t R5E `3 T22N R5E 2 T22N RSE t T2
MAPEtf£fAL MIAVE) USE B B]pS[�B1AL
aC Resource Conservation [_cv_J Center Village lrr industrial - Heavy
FED Residential 1 du/a- uC-Nt Urban Center - North 1 1X Industrial - Medium
97-4 Residential 4 du/a- Vc-N2 Urban Center - North 2 IL industrial - 1AghL
R-B Residential 9 du/ac h CD Center Downtown-
<P) Publicly owned
RMII Residential llanufa Lured Ramea C Commercial/Office/Residentiak
R-t0 Residential 10 du/ac
CpM1dE1�1Blf ----Renton City Limits
_.� Adjacent City Limits
R-I� Residential 14 du/ac Commercial Arterial.
Commercial Office• �rBaolr Pages Boundary
i RH-r Residential Multi -Family
RM-T Residential Multi -Family Traditional Commemiai Neighborhood HROU,
PAGE
:Rn�u 4emden ti al ){alit -Family Urban Center.
• Mxy include Oaerleq Districts. See .4PPendix
PAGE# INDEX
For vnditicnal regulations in Overlay
�isincc�. �ieaye see 311C 1-3. sec rrrc_mry a
Prr tsu ev Prrt .4 MIN Svcs. Cry of Renton
LIST OF SURROUNDING
PROPERTY OWNERS
WITHIN 300-FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PROJECT NAME: A-r
APPLICATION NO:
The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services
Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development.
NAME ADDRESS
oye
lo"Ll)
04 rij -rA 0-3 % GA
Cl" TO i A
it
0 1) A TVU C-; A
A
A�-
JP SAL-? %A io Pf'o �.10 S -1— 0 1
Q.\WEB\PW\DEVSERVTorms\Planning\owners.docO8/29/03 )
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
--'-0 - -Z. -I S 0
-3 34- 3 3 0 -z- -1 S;- 0
'3'N 4-3 7—*1 40
4- '16 c.)
3, Or 3 0 '- I-
4- C),
3-N 4-71 -'-% 0 - 7-16 Z5
(Attach additional sheets, if necessary)
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
Applicant Certification
11 t—s
_ -_, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property
(Print Name)
owners and their addresses were obtained from:
JV FJI�,
�
Title Company Records
,``���a
•���°e�s;; r
Ile
King County Assessors Records
fA�S ,
D
Signed
Date fo z 08
= `.�
(Applicant)
NOTARY
+1i:l i, r.00%
ATTESTED: bscni,l
and swom before me, a Notary Public, in and f r the State of Washington,
residing at
on the I day of
20Ar
Signed
(Notary Pu lc)
****For City of Renton Use'""`"`
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING
I, , hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to
(City Employee)
each listed property owner on
Signed Date:
NOTARY
Subscribed and swom before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing
on the day of 20
Q:\WEB\PWDEVSERVTomis\Planning\ownas.doc
LandAmerica
Commonwealth rMtT
N,� lyp �'°8 . ,.
7
ADDRESS ENDORSEMENT
ATTACHED TO LOAN POLICY NO. 20266883
ISSUED BY
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
The Company assures the Insured that at date of Policy there is located on the land:
a Single Family Residence
known as:
5301 Ripley Lane N, Renton, WA 98056
The Company hereby insures the Insured against loss which said Insured shall sustain in the event that the
assurance herein shall prove to be incorrect.
This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it
does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any
prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of
Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is
inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement
controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions
of the policy and of any prior endorsements.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
By Z57f J+lr- . —
Authorized sin Lure
WA Form - 116 Address
LandAmerica
Commonwealth
ENDORSEMENT
ATTACHED TO LOAN POLICY NO. 20266883
ISSUED BY
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
The Company insures the Owner of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage against loss or
damage sustained by reason of:
1. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage resulting from the
provisions therein which provide for changes in the rate of interest.
2. Loss of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage as security for the unpaid principal balance
of the loan, together with interest as changed in accordance with the provisions of the insured
mortgage, which loss of priority is caused by the changes in the rate of interest.
"Changes in the rate of interest," as used in this Endorsement, shall mean only those changes in the
rate of interest calculated pursuant to the formula provided in the insured mortgage at Date of Policy.
This Endorsement does not insure against loss or damage based upon (a) usury, or (b) any consumer
credit protection or truth -in -lending law.
This Endorsement is made a part of the Policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof
and of any prior endorsements thereto, except that the insurance afforded by this Endorsement is not
subject to Section 3(d) of the Exclusions From Coverage. Except to the extent expressly stated, it
neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the Policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it
extend the effective date of the Policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face
amount thereof.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
B z7�L74-. 12� —
Authonzed Si n ture
CLTA Form 111.5 - Variable Rate Mortgage (Revised 6/1/87)
Issued by
LandAmerica
Commonwealth
Order No.: 20266883
14450 N.E. 29th PI., #200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 425-646-8591
888-267-2303
Fax: 425-646-8593
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company LOAN POLICy OF TITLE INSURANCE
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE 8 AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS,
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation, herein called the Company, Insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss of
damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated In Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect In or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketabllity of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land;
5. The invalidity or unenfomeability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon the title;
6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage;
7. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material;
(a) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for or commenced prior to Date of Policy; or (b) arising from an improvement or work
related to the land which is contracted for or commenced subsequent to Date of Polity and which is financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by
the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the Insured has advanced or is obligated to advance;
B. Any assessments for street improvements under construction or cernpleted at Date of Policy which now have gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the
insured mortgage;
9. The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment of the insured mortgage, provided the assignment Is shown In Schedule A, or the failure of the assignment Shown in
Schedule A to vest title to the Insured mortgage In the named Insured assignee free and clear of all Liens.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title or the lien of the insured mortgage, as Insured, but only to the extent provided
in the Conditions and Stipulations.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
4*gyp SITlF fRX
"�I� JIL'AY�I�J_�ia[al Attest: By:
= x". i' 1 _ g -
Secretary :_ President
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this po[Ecy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to buiidmg and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restnMng, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the
occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or loratron of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (lit) a separation in ownership or a change in
the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or
governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting) from a violation or alleged violation affecting
the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof
or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded }n the public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exerese thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred
prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters;
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not reminded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured
claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant pnur to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no floss or damage
to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the prbrity of the lien of the insured mortgage over any
statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or
(e) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4. Uoenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the
indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceabllity of the lien or the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any
consumer credit protection or truth -in -lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory Hen for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an
Improvement or work related to the land which Is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness
secured by the insured mortgagee which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which ar3es out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar
a-ednors' rights laws, that is based on:
(I) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of Such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor.
ALTA Loan Policy (Revised 10/17/92)
Valid Only If Schedules A and B are Attached
Order No.: 20266883
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
I.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following terms when used in this policy mean:
(a) "insured": the insured named in Schedule A. The term "insured" also
includes
(1) the owner of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage
and each successor in ownership of the indebtedness except a
successor who Is an obligor under the provisions of Section 12(c) of
these Conditions and Stipulations (reserving, however, all rights
and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have
had against any predecessor insured, unless the successor
acquired the indebtedness as a purchaser for value without
knowledge of the asserted defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse
claim or other matter insured against by this policy as affecting
title to the estate or interest in the land);
(H) any governmental agency or governmental instrumentality which is
an Insurer or guarantor under an Insurance contract or guaranty
insuring or guaranteeing the Indebtedness secured by the insured
mortgage, or any part thereof, whether named as an insured
herein or not;
(iii) the parties designated in Section 2(a) of these Conditions and
Stipulations,
(b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or damage.
(c) "knowledge" or "known": actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge
or notice which may be Imputed to an insured by reason of the public
records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart
constructive notice of matters affecting the land.
(d) 'land'. the land described or referred to In Schedule A, and
improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The
term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area
described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest,
estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes,
ways or waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to
which a right of access to and from the land Is insured by this policy.
(e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security
instrument.
(f) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of
Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating
to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With
respect to Section 1(a)(iv) of the Exclusions From Coverage, "public
records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the
records of the Berk of the United States district court for the district in
which the land is located.
(g) "unmarketability of the title': an alleged or apparent matter affecting
the title to the land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which
would entitle a purchaser of the estate or Interest described in Schedule
A or the Insured mortgage to be released from the obligation to purchase
by virtue of a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable
tide.
2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE
(a) After Acquisition of Title. The coverage of this policy shah continue in
force as of Date of Policy in favor of (1) an insured who acquires all or
any part of the estate or interest In the land by foreclosure, trustee's
sale, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure, or other legal manner which
discharges the lien of the Insured mortgage; (ii) a transferee of the
estate or interest so acquired from an insured corporation, provided the
transferee is the parent or wholly -owned subsidiary of the insured
corporation, and their corporate successors by operation or law and not
by purchase, subject to any rights or defenses the Company may have
against any predecessor insureds; and (Ili) any governmental agency or
governmental instrumentality which acquires all or any part of the estate
or interest pursuant to a contract of Insurance or guaranty insuring or
guaranteeing the Indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage.
(b) After Conveyance of Title. The coverage of this policy shall continue in
force as of Date of Policy in favor of an insured only so long as the
insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness
secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the
Insured, or only so long as the insured shall have hablity by reason of
covenants of warranty made by the Insured in any transfer or
conveyance of the estate or Interest. This policy shall not continue in
force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of either (i) an estate or
interest in the land, or (ii) an indebtedness secured by a purchase money
mortgage given to the Insured.
(c) Amount of Insurance. The amount of insurance after the acquisition or
after the Conveyance shall in neither event exceed the least of:
(€) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A;
(II) the amount of the principal of the indebtedness secured by the
insured mortgage as of Date of Policy, Interest thereon, expenses
of foreclosure, amounts advanced pursuant to the insured
mortgage to assure compliance with laws or to protect the lien of
the insured mortgage prior to the time of acquisition of the estate
or Interest in the land and secured thereby and reasonable
amounts expended to prevent deterioration of Improvements, but
reduced by the amount of all payments made; or
(Ill) the amount paid by any governmental agency or governmental
Instrumentality, if the agency or instrumentality is the insured
claimant, in the acquisition of the estate or interest In satisfaction
of Its Insurance contract or guaranty.
3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT
The Insured shah notify the Company promptly in writing (1) in case of any
litigation as set forth in Section 4(a) below, (ii) In case knowledge shah come to an
insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the
estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage, as insured, and which might
cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy,
or (iii) if title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage, as insured,
is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company,
then as to the insured all lability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the
matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that
failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured
under this policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only
to the extent of the prejudice,
DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED
CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE
(a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options Contained
in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, at its
own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense
of an insured in litigation In which any third party asserts a claim adverse
to the title or interest as Insured, but only as to those stated causes of
action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured
against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select
counsel of Its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for
reasonable cause) to represent the insured as to those stated causes of
action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other
counsel, The Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred
by the insured in the defense of those causes of action which allege
matters not Insured against by this policy.
(b) The Company shall have the right, at Its own cast, to institute and
prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its
opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate
or Interest or the lien of the insured mortgage, as insured, or to prevent
or reduce loss or damage to the insured. The Company may take any
appropriate action under the terns of this policy, whether or not it shall
be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any
provision of this policy_ If the Company shall exercise its rights under this
paragraph, it shall do so diligently.
(c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or Interposed a
defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the
Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of
competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the r€ghtr In its sore
discretion, to appeal From arty adverse judgment or order.
(d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to
prosecute or provide for the defense or any action or proceeding, the
insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide
defense in the action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit
the Company to use, at its option, the name of the insured for this
purpose_ Whenever requested by the Company, the insured, at the
Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (1) in any
action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting
or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (11) In
any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be
necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest or
the lien of the Insured mortgage, as insured. If the Company is
prejudiced by the failure of the insured to fumish the required
cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy
shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute,
or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring
such cooperation.
5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE
In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these
Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or
damage signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shalt be furnished to the
Company within 90 days after the insured claimant shall ascertain the facts giving
rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect In,
or lien or encumbrance on the title, or other matter insured against by this policy
which constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible,
the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is
prejudiced by the failure of the Insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss
or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall
terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any
litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or
damage.
In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably be required to submit to
examination under oath by arty authorized representative of the Company and shall
produce for examination, Inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and
places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all
records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a
date before or after Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage.
Further, If requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the insured
claimant shall grant Its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of
the Company to examine, Inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks,
correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which
reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential
by the Insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not
be disclosed to others unless, In the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is
necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to
submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested Information
or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary Information from third parties as
required In this paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall
terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim_
File No.: 20266883
SCHEDULE B
PART I
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys'
fees or expenses which arise by) reason of:
1. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER
DELINQUENCY:
(1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1)
TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 3343302795
YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE
2006 $8,241.66 $8,241.66 $0,00
2. NOTICE OF TAP OR CONNECTION CHARGES WHICH HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE DUE IN
CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OR RE -DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY
RECORDED INSTRUMENT. INQUIRIES REGARDING THE SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF THE
CHARGES SHOULD BE MADE TO THE CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY.
CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 107
RECORDED: DECEMBER 27, 1989
RECORDING NO.: 8912270592
3. NOTICE OF TAP OR CONNECTION CHARGES WHICH HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE DUE IN
CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OR RE -DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY
RECORDED INSTRUMENT. INQUIRIES REGARDING THE SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF THE
CHARGES SHOULD BE MADE TO THE CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY.
CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY: CITY OF BELLEVUE
RECORDED: DECEMBER 20, 1996
RECORDING NO.: 9612200938
4. AGREEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, APPEARING IN
THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
5. ANY EASEMENTS OR SERVITUDES APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
6. ANY LEASE, GRANT, EXCEPTION OR RESERVATION OF MINERALS OR MINERAL, RIGHTS
APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
7. RIGHT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF THE LAND
HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF LAKE
WASHINGTON.
8. RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS OF THE PUBLIC FOR COMMERCE, NAVIGATION, RECREATION
AND FISHERIES.
9. ANY RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF THE LAND RESULTING FROM THE RIGHTS OF THE
PUBLIC OR RIPARIAN OWNERS TO USE ANY PORTION WHICH IS NOW, OR HAS BEEN,
COVERED BY WATER.
10. ACCESS TO SAID PROPERTY IS ACROSS NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY (NOW
BURLINGTON INC'S) RIGHT-OF-WAY AS GRANTED BY EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING
COUNTY RECORDING NOS, 3013390 AND 5254582 AND BY PERMIT UNDER RECORDING
NO. 5284825. SAID ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY IS REVOCABLE BY SAID RAILWAY COMPANY
AND SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS SET FORTH THEREIN.
ALTA Loan Policy
Page 3
SCHEDULE B - PART I
Continued
11. MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY:
RECORDED: DECEMBER 19, 2005
RECORDING NO.: 20051219900005
ALTA Loan Policy
END OF SCHEDULE B -- PART I
Page 4
File No.: 20266883
File No.: 20266883
SCHEDULE B
PART II
In addition to the matters set forth in Part I of this Schedule, the title to the estate or interest in
the land described or referred to in Schedule A is subject to the following matters, if any be shown,
but the Company insures that such matters are subordinate to the lien or charge of the insured
mortgage upon said estate or interest:
NONE
bid
ALTA Loan Policy
End of Schedule B — Part II
Page 5
14450 N.E. 29" PI., #200
c o mm o nr. Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 425-646-8591
LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND, LLC 888-267-2303
Fax: 425-646-8593
May 16, 2007
Plaza Nome Mortgage, Inc.
5090 Shoreham Place, #206
San Diego, CA 92122
BORROWER: Matthew P. Flynn
YOUR REF: 09610265
OUR NO.: 20266883
Attached is your ALTA 1992 Loan Policy policy of title insurance.
Thank you for allowing us to serve you. We look forward to assisting you in the future.
Randy McCrory
File No.: 20266883
LandAmerica
Commonwealth
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
ISSUED BY
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE A
Amount of Insurance: $999,999.00 Policy/File No.: 20266883
Premium: $1,116.00
Loan Number: 09610265
Date of Policy: November 28, 2006 at 3:3S pm
1. Name of Insured:
Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc., appearing of record as Mortgage Electronic Electric
Registration Systems, Inc.(MERS), solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's
successors and assigns
2. The estate or interest in the land which is encumbered by the insured mortgage is:
a fee simple estate
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in:
Matthew P. Flynn, as his separate estate
4. The insured mortgage and assignments thereof, if any, are described as follows:
DEED OF TRUST:
Grantor:
Matthew P. Flynn, an unmarried man
Trustee
Commonwealth
Beneficiary:
Mortgage Electronic Electric Registration Systems,
Inc.(MERS), solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's
successors and assigns; Lender is: Plaza Home Mortgage,
Inc.
Original Amount:
$999,999.00
Dated:
November 14, 2006
Recorded:
November 28, 2006
Recording No.:
20061127002084
5. The land referred to in this policy is described as set forth in the insured mortgage, is situated
in the County of King, State of Washington, and is identified as more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
By 1140w4- . la�
Authorized sin Lure
ALTA Loan Policy
LandAmerica
Commonwealth
COMPREHENSIVE ENDORSEMENT
ATTACHED TO LOAN POLICY NO. 20266883
ISSUED BY
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
The Company hereby insures against loss which said Insured shall sustain by reason of any of the following matters:
1. Any incorrectness in the assurance with the Company hereby gives:
a. That there are no covenants, conditions, or restrictions under which the lien of the mortgage referred to in
Schedule A can be cut off, subordinated, or otherwise impaired;
b. That, except as shown in Schedule B, there are no present violations on said land of any enforceable
covenants, conditions, or restrictions,
C. That, except as shown in Schedule B, there are no encroachments of buildings, structures, or
improvements located on said land onto adjoining lands, nor any encroachments onto said land of
buildings, structures, or improvements located on adjoining lands.
2. Any future violations on said land of any covenants, conditions or restrictions occurring prior to acquisition of title
to said land by the Insured, provided such violations result in loss or impairment of the lien of the mortgage
referred to in Schedule A, or result in loss or impairment of the title to said land if the Insured shall acquire such
title in satisfaction of the indebtedness secured by such mortgage.
3. Damage to existing improvements which are located or encroach upon that portion of the land subject to any
easement shown in Schedule B, which damage results from the exercise of the right to use or maintain such
easement for the purposes for which the same was granted or reserved.
4. Any final court order or judgment requiring removal from any land adjoining said land of any encroachment shown
in Schedule B.
Wherever in this Endorsement any or all the words "covenants, conditions or restrictions" appear, they shall not be deemed
to refer to or include the terms, covenants and conditions contained in any lease referred to in Schedule A. No coverage is
provided under this Endorsement as to any covenant, condition, restriction or other provision relating to environmental
protection.
This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (1) modify any of the terms and
provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (ill) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of
Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of
this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of
the policy and of any prior endorsements.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
By. �)3� —
Authorized Si n ture
WA Form — 100 Comprehensive (1/1/94)
1 LandAmerica
Commonwealth
ALTA ENDORSEMENT FORM - 8.1
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LIEN
ATTACHED TO LOAN POLICY NO. 20266883
ISSUED BY
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
The insurance afforded by this Endorsement is only effective if the land is used or is to be used primarily for
residential purposes.
The Company insures the Insured against loss or damage sustained by reason of lack of priority of the lien of
the insured mortgage over:
Any environmental protection lien which, at Date of Policy, is recorded in those records established
under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge, or filed in the records of the
clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located, except as set forth
in Schedule B; or
Any environmental protection lien provided for by any state statute in effect at Date of Policy, except
environmental protection liens provided for by the following state statutes:
RCW 70.121.140
This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of
the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or
(iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is
inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this
endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
ey
/7�L-�. . pv:4�
Authorized St n ture
ALTA Form 8.1 - Environmental Protection Lien (Revised 3/27/87)
Printed: 07-01-2008
Payment Made
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUA08-071
07/01 /2008 11:03 AM
Total Payment: 200.00
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Receipt Number
Payee: FLYNN INVESTMENTS
Trans Account Code Description Amount
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 200.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check ##1029 200.00
Account Balances
Trans
Account Code
Description
Balance Due
3021
303.000,00.345.85
Park Mitigation Fee
.00
5006
000.345.81,00.0002
Annexation Fees
.00
5007
000.345.81.00.0003
Appeals/Waivers
.00
5008
000.345.81.00.0004
Binding Site/Short Plat
.00
5009
000.345.81.00.0006
Conditional Use Fees
.00
5010
000,345.81,00.0007
Environmental Review
.00
5011
000.345.81.00.0008
Prelim/Tentative Plat
.00
5012
000.345.81.00.0009
Final Plat
.00
5013
000.345.81.00.0010
PUD
.00
5014
000.245.81.00.0011
Grading & Filling Fees
.00
5015
000.345.81.00.0012
Lot Line Adjustment
.00
5016
000.345.81.00,0013
Mobile Home Parks
.00
5017
000.345.81.00.0014
Rezone
.00
5018
000.345.81.00.0015
Routine Vegetation Mgmt
.00
5019
000.345.81.00.0016
Shoreline Subst Dev
.00
5020
000.345.81.00,0017
Site Plan Approval
.00
5021
000.345.81.00.0018
Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence
.00
5022
000.345.81.00.0019
Variance Fees
.00
5024
000.345.81.00.0024
Conditional Approval Fee
.00
5036
000.345.81.00.0005
Comprehensive Plan Amend
.00
5909
000.341.60.00.0024
Booklets/EIS/Copies
.00
5941
000.341.50.00.0000
Maps (Taxable)
.00
5954
650,237.00.00.0000
DO NOT USE - USE 3954
.00
5955
000.05.519,90.42.1
Postage
.00
5998
000.231.70.00.0000
Tax
.00
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
R0803410
f
�CtS--T lice
1
f
P
g
i
k yy
1
i
7
Ti
{
.�.°
5 y�
r
F
•! �+tA % i
:
A i y� Y £� i X� ■ ..-.
QD
I J
101
10-] €
0
co - V,78
t
APPROVED Y
SCALE: R
� �- � .:.:,� ' DRAWN BY
DATE. (26
PJ
DRAWING NUMBER
77, ~7- 1
kz,
C.T
T>
APPROVED BY0 RAWN Z-)
UATIE;
rL
DPAWING NUMBER
Tz-