Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker 5uWect; Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Graffiti Control Ordinance LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-135, ECF Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Chip Vincent Acceptance Date: November 10, 2008 Applicant: Jennifer Henning, City of Renton CED Owner: N/A Contact: Chip Vincent PID Number: a ERC Approval Date: November 10, 2008 ERC Appeal Date: December 1, 2008 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: l By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. Location: Citywide ' Comments: PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 1, 2008 APPROVED -BY CITY COUNCIL Date Graffiti Control Ordinance (November 17; 2008)) The Public Safety Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the adoption of the Graffiti Control Ordinance, by amending Title IV, and adding a . new chapter, Chapter 29. The Graffiti Control Ordinance is intended to help prevent the spread of graffiti vandalism and provide additional enforcement tools, to protect public and private property from acts of graffiti vandalism and defacement. The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. Greg Taylor, air andy Corman, Vice Chair' CSL-- - Don Persson, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Neil watts Jennifer Henning STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on, November 15, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $94.50: , �� . %%% inda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subsc ibed and savor to me this 17th day of November, 2008.�.�*�������►tilr ash Dal = �:o" �XpQf" �Z y Notary Publi or the State of Washington, Resid'm =�� te.Ri- 'V'' in Covington, Washington = o xz o P. D. Number: i' �� tp It,,tt 10-A9�.���']�� - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non - Significance for the Following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Graffiti Control Ordinance LUA08-135, ECF Location: NIA. Description: City of Renton requestsenvironmental review of a proposed ordinance regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would snake unlawful the application of graffiti, & possession of graffiti implements. It would also allow courts to order restitution to victims; & allow For the use of public funds for graffiti rernoval. Appeals of the environmental delenninalion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 I M on December 1, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.R. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-65t0. Published in the Renton Reporter on November 15, 2008. #146795, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Graffiti Control Ordinance PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-f 35. 1LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton requests Environmental ISEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possesslon of graffiti Implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restdution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. ThIs proposed ordinance would assist Police and Code Compliance In reducing the incidences of graffiti and vandalism. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRCN%1ENTAl REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT - Comments regarding the proposal or appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 1, 201 Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805T Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4i Additional inionnatlon regarding the appeal process may be obtained from Vr Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMiNIA I ION IS ,SPP"tLED. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CCNTP,,CT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. 00 NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I, •ACM WI W O'C"V�f , hereby certify that �J copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on I SVM ,qo II+ fIi r, ,IOC G'Lr — �v`�U �1Nik�41•�3 DATE: il� lt#(� SIGNED: �. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before lne, a Notan Pi in and for the State of Washington residing in y - �j@_� NOTARY PUBLIC SIGMA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Graffiti Control Ordinance PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-135, ECF LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. This proposed ordinance would assist Police and Code Compliance in reducing the incidences of graffiti and vandalism. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the proposal or appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 1, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. t � t ' Denis Law, Mayor November 13, 2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination CITY ]F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 10, 2008: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: Graffiti Control Ordinance PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-135, ECF LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. This proposed ordinance would assist Police and Code Compliance in reducing the incidences of graffiti and vandalism. Comments on the proposal or appeals of the environmental determination must be Bled in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 1, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal. Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jennifer Henning, AICP Current Planning Manager Enclosure cc; King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian "Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation RENTON 1055 South Grady Way - Renton. Washington 98057 AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper conta ns 50"._ recycled malenal, 3D%post consumer e CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: ►1Wa4il�I04kI PROJECT NAME: LUA08-135, ECF City of Renton Graffiti Control Ordinance DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would_ Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. This proposed ordinance would assist Police and Code Compliance in reducing the incidences of graffiti and vandalism. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Citywide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Comments regarding the proposal or appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 1, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES; Community Services November 15, 2008 November 10, 2008 e I. David Daniels, Administrator Date Fire & Emergency Services Date Alex Pietsch, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE November 10, 2008 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Monday, November 10, 2008 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Raqle Shorn Plat _ (Timmons) LUA08-042, ECF, SHPL-A, V-A, V-A, V-A (Variances Denied 5128/08) Location: 168XX Block of 106th Avenue. The applicant is requesting Short Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 19,688 square foot parcel into 3 lots for the future construction of 3 single family residences. The applicant applied for three variances to allow for a reduction in lot width for all proposed lots, The variances were denied and the applicant submitted a revised short plat plan with all lots meeting the lot width requirements of the zone. The project site is located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 6,325 square feet in area to 7,028 square feet. Access would be gained via a new 20-foot wide private alley extending from 106th Ave SE. A 2,144 square foot Class 3 wetland is present in the southwest corner of the site. There are no proposed impacts to the wetland, however, the applicant is requesting that the wetland be exempt from critical area regulations as an unregulated wetland. Brookefield 11I Short Plat (Reconsideration) (Wasser) LUA08-080, ECF, SHPL-H, LLA Location: 1055 Lyons Avenue NE, 1059 Nile Avenue NE, and 1062 Ilwaco Place NE. The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment, a Hearing Examiner Review and Approval of a 6-lot Short Plat, and Environmental {SEPA) Review of a 120,540 square foot site. The proposed lots would range in size from 8,395 square feet to 13,940 square feet. The proposed project encompasses a Category 2 Wetland and a Class 4 Stream. The proposed lot line adjustment and short plat are within the Residential - 4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning designation. Access to the proposed project would be via Ilwaco Place NE and Lot 15 of the Brookefield Plat which was reserved for ingresslegress for future development and is zoned Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) and two proposed internal streets. A modification of the City of Renton street standards has been requested to allow 26 foot wide public streets within the proposed project. [Reconsideration]: The original application materials submitted for LUA08-060, LLA, SHPL-H, ECF, and the Brookefield ill Short Plat project indicated that approximately 12,000 cubic yards of fill material would be needed for the project. Prior to the ERC threshold determination for the project, the applicant stated that the amount of fill needed would be 36,000 cubic yards. The current proposal is approximately 15,000 cubic yards. While the proposed amount of fill material has been reduced, staff believes that the Determination of Significance Is still appropriate for this project. Additional analysis via an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and evaluation of a range of alternatives prior to determining appropriate mitigation measures is still recommended. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE November 10, 2008 PAGE 2 Chelan Creek PUD (Timmons) LUA08-067, ECF, PP, PPUD, FPUD - Location: 860 & 928 Chelan Avenue NE. The applicant is requesting approval for a Preliminary Planned Urban Development (PPUD), Final Planned Urban Development (FPUD), Preliminary Plat (PP), and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The proposal is for the subdivision of a 4.49 acre site into 16 lots and 2 access tracts. There are two existing residences and several outbuildings; of which two are proposed for removal. The project site is located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 3,930 square feet in area to 7,658 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension of existing roads, including: Chelan Ave NE, NE 9th Street, and Chelan Place NE. As part of the Planned Urban Development the applicant is requesting modifications from City of Renton street standards and the R-8 development standards. The site contains a Class 4 stream and a Category 2 wetland. The applicant proposes to average the 50-foot required wetland buffer, and in no case is the buffer proposed to be less than 25 feet. The applicant is proposing to provide passive recreational areas and enhancement to the critical area buffers beyond what is required by code. There are 44 protected trees onsite of which 9 are proposed to remain and the applicant is proposing to replant a total of 32 new trees. Graffiti Control Ordinance _ (Henning) LUA08-135, ECF Location: Citywide. The City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. This proposed ordinance would assist Police and Code Compliance in reducing the incidences of graffiti and vandalism. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S, Dale Estey, CED Director 0 D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director 0 F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner C. Duffy, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal 0 J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CED Planning Director L. Warren, City Attorney 0 ERC City of Renton REPORT Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: November 10, 2008 Project Name: Graffiti Control Ordinance Owner: NIA Applicant: City of Renton Contact: Chip Vincent, Planning Director, City of Renton File Number: LUA08-135, ECF Project Manager: Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager, City of Renton Project Summary: City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would: Make unlawful the application of graffiti; make the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia unlawful; allow the court to order violators to make restitution to the victim; and allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal. Project Location: City-wide Exist. Bldg. Area SF: NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): NIA Site Area: NIA Total Building Area GSF: NIA STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). ERC Report Graffiti Ord 08-135.doc City of Denton Department of Comm----ity & Economic Development GRAFFITI CONTROL ORDINA. Report of November 10, 2008 En-'­onmental Review Committee Report LUA08-135, ECF Page 2 of 3 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND The City of Renton requests Environmental (SEPA) Review of a proposed ordinance amending Title IV (Police Regulations), and adding a chapter (Chapter 29) regarding Graffiti Control. The ordinance would make it unlawful to apply graffiti on a natural or manmade surface on public or private property. The Ordinance would establish fines and punishment for offenses. In addition, the ordinance would make unlawful the possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia (with exceptions). The Ordinance would allow a court to order violators to make restitution to victims of graffiti. The Ordinance would also allow for the use of public funds for graffiti removal PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.244, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period with a Concurrent 15-day Comment Period. B. Mitigation Measures None required for this non -project action. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Draft Ordinance D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal is being circulated far review by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. As this proposal is a non -project action, an evaluation of environmental impacts is subject to criteria indicated below. 1. Is the proposal likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No impacts to water or air would occur. No storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances would occur; and, no noise would be generated by this non -project action. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life? No impacts would occur as a result of this non -project action. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No adverse impacts to energy or natural resources would occur as a result of this non -project action. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains or prime farmlands? No environmentally sensitive areas would be affected adversely by this non -project action. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? ERC Report Grajfzti Ord 08-135.doe City of Renton Department of Com city & Economic Development Er ' -onmental Review Committee Report GRAFFITI CONTROL ORDIN.. LUA08-135, ECF Report of November 10, 2008 Page 3 of 12 No impacts to land or shoreline areas would occur as a result of this non -project action. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No impacts would occur as a result of this non -project action. 7. Would the proposal conflict with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment? The proposal would not conflict with other local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal is being circulated to City Departments and Division Reviewers. Several departments have reviewed the draft via a Graffiti and Vandalism Task Force, and no impacts have been identified during their review. Environmental Determination Combined Comment & Appeal Process. Comments regarding the Proposal or Appeals of the environmental determination JRCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-6801 must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1, 2008. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC Report Graffiti Ord 08-135. doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TITLE VI (POLICE REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON," BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 29, TITLED GRAFFITI CONTROL, RELATING TO PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL OF GRAFFITI. WHEREAS, graffiti is a public nuisance and destructive of the rights and values of property owners as well as the entire community; and WHEREAS, unless the City acts to facilitate the removal of graffiti from public and private property, the graffiti tends to remain, which can in turn cause other properties to become the target of graffiti, affecting public safety and quality of life in entire neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, enacting this ordinance is to help prevent the spread of graffiti vandalism and provide additional enforcement tools to protect public and private property from acts of graffiti vandalism and defacement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Title IV (Police Regulations) of ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington, is hereby amended by adding a Chapter 29, titled Graffiti Control, to read as follows: CHAPTER 29 GRAFFITI CONTROL SECTION 6-29-1 Definitions 6-29-2 Unlawful application of graffiti 6-29-3 Unlawful possession of graffiti implements or paraphernalia ---- Exceptions ORDINANCE NO. 6-29-4 Restitution — community service 6-29-5 Use of public funds for graffiti removal 6-29-6 Severability 6-29-7 Third Party Liability 6-29-1 DEFINITIONS: The definitions set forth in this Section apply throughout this chapter. A. "Aerosol paint container" means any aerosol container, regardless of the material from which it is made, which is adapted or made for the purpose of spraying paint, dye, or other substances. B. "Felt tip marker" means any indelible marker or similar implement, with a tip at its broadest width greater than one -eighth inch, containing anything other than a solution which can be removed with water after it dries. C. "Graffiti" means any unauthorized inscription, word, figure, painting, design, label, marking, symbol, or other defacement that is marked, etched, scratched, engraved, drawn, painted, sprayed, or otherwise affixed on any surface of public or private property, either natural or manmade; to the extent that the graffiti was not authorized in advance by the owner or occupant of the property, or, despite advance authorization, is deemed a public nuisance. The owner or occupant cannot authorize a public nuisance. D. "Graffiti stick" or "paint stick" means any device containing a solid form of paint, chalk, wax, epoxy, or other substance capable of being applied to a surface by pressure, and upon application, leaving a mark at least one -sixteenth of an inch in width. 2 ORDINANCE NO. E. "Gum label" means any sheet of paper, fabric, plastic, or other substance with an adhesive backing which, when placed on a surface, is not immediately removable. F. "Graffiti implement or paraphernalia" means any aerosol paint container, felt tip marker, graffiti stick or paint stick, gum label, brush, roller, or etching tool or any other device capable of scarring or marking any surface, including but not limited to glass, metal, concrete, or wood; and any piece, design, or scrapbook or drawings illustrating graffiti marks or signs. G. "Owner" means any entity or entities having a legal or equitable interest in real or personal property. H. "Occupant" means a tenant, lessee or renter. I. "Premises open to the public" means all public spaces, including, but not limited to, streets, alleys, sidewalks, parks, and public open space, as well as private property onto which the public is regularly invited or permitted to enter for any purpose, the doorways and entrances to those buildings or dwellings, and the grounds enclosing them. J. "Property" means any real or personal property which is affixed, incidental or appurtenant to real property, including, but not limited to, any structure, fence, wall, sign, or any separate part thereof, whether permanent or not. K. "Responsible public agency" means a public owner, the United States of America, the state of Washington, or any other state, and all political subdivisions thereof, a federal, state, or local department or agency, the director or administrator of a federal, state, or local department or agency who has authority 3 ORDINANCE NO. over the public property's maintenance or management. There may be more than one responsible public agency for a particular public property. L. "Responsible private party" means a private owner or occupant, an entity, a person acting as an agent for a private owner by agreement, a person or entity who has authority over the private property, or a person or entity responsible for the private property's maintenance or management. Irrespective of any arrangement to the contrary with any other party, each private owner shall always be a responsible private party for the purposes of this chapter. There may be more than one responsible private party for a particular private property. M. "Unauthorized" means without the prior express permission or consent of a responsible public agency or a responsible private party. 6-29-2 UNLAWFUL APPLICATION OF GRAFFITI: A. It is unlawful for any person to paint, spray, chalk, etch, draw, mark, or otherwise apply graffiti on any natural or manmade surface on a public or, without written permission of the owner or occupant, privately owned: buildings, signs, walls, fences, permanent structures, property, or places or other surfaces within the City. B. Any person who violates the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. 6-29-3 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF GRAFFITI IMPLEMENTS OR PARAPHERNALIA — EXCEPTIONS: 4 ORDINANCE NO. A. It is unlawful for any person to have in his or her possession any graffiti implement or paraphernalia, in a manner or under circumstances demonstrating his or her intent to paint, spray, chalk, draw, etch, mark, or otherwise apply graffiti, while: 1. In a public place, or private property without the prior written consent of the responsible private party; or 2. On any school property, grounds, facilities, buildings, or structures, or in areas immediately adjacent to those specific locations upon public property; or 3. While in or upon premises open to the public, or while in or upon any public facility, playground, recreational facility, or other public building or structure owned or operated by the City or while in or within fifty feet of an underpass, bridge, overpass, pedestrian crossing, bridge abutment, storm drain, retaining wall, transit shelter, or similar types of infrastructure unless otherwise authorized by the City or responsible public agency. B. Exceptions. 1. The proscriptions of Subsection A2 of this Section shall not apply to the possession of broad -tipped markers or other implements by a student attending and actively enrolled in a class which formally requires use of such markers or implements, while the student is attending class or traveling to or from the school at which the class is being attended. The burden of proof in any prosecution for violation of Subsection B of this Section shall be upon the student to establish the need to possess a broad -tipped marker or other implement. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2. The proscriptions of Subsection A2 of this Section shall not apply to an authorized school employee, volunteer, contractor, or parent of a student attending class at the school. 3. The proscriptions of Subsection A3 of this Section shall not apply to an authorized City employee of the City of Renton or agents thereof, or its contractors or employees of other government agencies working with the City of Renton. C. Any person who violates the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or by both such fine and imprisonment. 6-29-4 RESTITUTION -- COMMUNITY SERVICE: A. In addition to any punishment specified in this ordinance, the court may order any violator to make restitution to the victim for damages or loss caused by the violator's offense in the amount or manner determined by the court. For purposes of this Section, if the City uses its funds and/or other resources to remove graffiti from city -owned property or, in agreement with the owner, from non -city owned property, the City shall be considered a victim for purposes of restitution. B. In lieu of, or as part of, the penalties specified in this ordinance, a violator may be required to perform community service as described by the court based on the following minimum requirements: 6 ORDINANCE, NO. 1. If the Court wishes to impose community service in lieu of other penalties provided herein, the violator shall be ordered to perform at least 30 hours of community service; and 2. The entire period of community service shall be performed under the supervision of a community service provider approved by the Chief of Police or his designee; and 3. Reasonable effort shall be made to assign the violator to a type of community service that is reasonably expected to have the most rehabilitative effect on the violator, such as community service that involves graffiti removal. 6-29-5 USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL: Whenever the City becomes aware of or is notified and determines that graffiti is located on publicly or privately owned property visible from premises open to the public, the City is authorized to use public funds for the removal of graffiti, or for the painting or repairing of the graffiti, but shall not authorize or undertake to provide for the painting or repair of any more extensive area than that where the graffiti is located, unless it is determined in writing that a more extensive area is required to be repainted or repaired in order to avoid an aesthetic disfigurement to the neighborhood or community, or unless the property owner or responsible party agrees to pay for the costs of repainting or repairing the more extensive area. All aspects of graffiti removal are at the discretion of the City including, but not limited to the method of and material used for repair. 6-29-6 SEVERABILITY: 7 ORDINANCE NO. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Renton hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 6-29-7 THIRD PARTY LIABILITY: It is expressly the purpose of this ordinance to provide for and promote the health, safety and welfare of the general public and not to create or otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the terms of this ordinance. It is the specific intent of this ordinance that no provision nor any term used in this ordinance is intended to impose any duty whatsoever upon the City or any of its officers or employees, for whom the implementation and enforcement of this ordinance shall be discretionary and not mandatory. Nothing contained in this ordinance is intended nor shall be construed to create or form the basis of any liability on the party of the City, or its officers, employees or agents, for any injury or damage resulting from any action or inaction on the part of the City related in any manner to the enforcement of this ordinance by its officers, employees or agents. 8 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12008. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Approved as to farm: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1493:7/18/08:scr 9 Denis Law, Mayor City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: je-14 ✓YI COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: F CITY: /Z J-` ZIP:r TELEPHONE NUMBER-v �7 CONTACT PERSON NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PROJECTIADDRESS(SYLOCATION AND ZIP CODE: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Jl)11�- EXISTING LAND USE(S): IU /� G PROPOSED LAND USE(S): N P EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):Jl/i EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): !f . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVAT� ACCESS EASEMENTS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ter14� H:Torms\Planninglmasterapp.doc - 1 - 08/07 PR— 'ECT INFOF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESID NTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): A /- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable). - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): �! SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): MATION (contir d PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS scf_ ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal descri tion on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION_, TOWNSHIP_, RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1.3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) \" nI' " � 441 , declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the properly involved in this application or ,-�c the authorized repr entative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires:. H:1t=ormslPlanninglmasterapp.doc - 2 - 08./07 W PLANNING DIVISION 04VAR" 0NM*E'N'T'- A L CH-ECKL IS T City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL. SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively, WForms\PRanninglenvchist.doc - 1 - 02108 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Drdipt awc 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared. I l /R � j200� 5. Agency requesting checklist: G ; +LJ a to 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No - 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. r�Do C, 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N1A 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 4f pA i p VA"" M(& AAfO-r" 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. p0viowr, nevi 'nj Wrco gel vwah'iru� (TO/c - V v j ra fi-h avr 4[. T'L+(, a p-d4uc m c w o t'tA a w � t' G aPP t' �a�5t5d"ti °�i'�r pdrarr���ra o r' i p �*.w+ ; a Ilvc•c7 cur 4D o VA vro [�-o , - wt� fie r� ;fn fi') _fV v' ' H:IFormslPlanninglernchlst,doc .f zI to- � f 2- J I l r G �-W 02/0$ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 61'�-1vrdc B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Gl-F� W;dG b_ What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) CIA C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you Know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. N/A d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe_ �J/Ar e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Nla . of g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? f�/At h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NIA HAForrns\Planninglenvchlst.doc - 3 - 02/08 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. rQ /A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. �,f /A 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1} Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. t,J/A 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. �J/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. I'Q/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. �'/A 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A H:TonnsTlanninglenvchlst.doc - 4 02/08 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NIA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: n�/A ►EENEL',.vr&.l a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs W f A grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? �J/A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 'J/A d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A H:1FormsTlanninglenvchlst_doc - 5 - 02108 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: N Ar I fqM— F,i,�j Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/P� C. Is the site part of a migration route? if so, explain N /, d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: r,f/ A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. t,J/A c_ What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NIA 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. VJ/A 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N!h 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 111/h, H_IFormsWlanninglenvchlst.doc - 6 - 02108 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? tji /A 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A 3) Proposed measures Ator reduce or control noise impacts, if any: I'/A 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? nl ova ~ �terg: N/A b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. N/A C. Describe any structures on the site. i�/A d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? fJ /� e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? N /,k f_ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? rJ/A g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. I � f i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A HAFormsT1anninglenvch1st.doo - 7 - 02108 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N /A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I J/4' I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. r u/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income hou ing. NA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N1A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b_ What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: rVe ro y-Cd o rAl'vl a.Kc-e WT bW 6,0,0+—Y'I' �4t l K., ��•o vtd ge�The?r� 1 '�. �a-e - (5 9'I. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? YIJ/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? �J]A- HAFormMPJanninglenvchlst.doc - 8 - 02/08 C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 14/ A 1Z RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. YA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NIA 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL. PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. t` /A b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/)k 14. TRANSPORTATION a_ Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N /A b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? HAForms\P1anning\envch1st.doc - 9 - 02/08 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? / e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/AC f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NI& g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A is. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N/A b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. �/A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. N /Pv b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N /A C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �I Name Printed: \J fM Ih I t-V 'T `—CIA K Date: I i III 10 Y HAForms%Planninglenvchlst.doc - 90- 02/08 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS i� txts sould used or. lnvng �plans haid . ' lira rt �_` IlE out these s ' `... for r 00 t.1 f Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? V,J/A �W -t�'5 V16 M - K1,,6J'-e- Cf- t7-110 P 0 5 a I - Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are_ N/fie 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A I How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? �J/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: tq! A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N 1A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? NI/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: �J /A H:TormslPlanninglenvchlst.doc - 11 - 02108 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? hJ lAr Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: f ' )I.Ar 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/pr SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: `Je-sl Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED W8 HftForms\PlanninglenvchlsLdoc - 12 - 02/08