Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1 2 of 2I L-9 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TrY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov FILE NO.: L07SO079 REVIEW PLANNER: FERESHTEH DEHKORDI REVIEW ENGINEER: MARK FOLLMER APPLICATION FILED: December 11, 2007 Related Files: 407/0/Ll Iq J� SHORT PLAT TYPE 2 FILE CONTENTS 1 LOG -IN SHEET PROJECT / FILE NAME:CEPOV-SHORT PLAT OWNER(S): Freilin er Nina AGENT(S): Alfredson, Dennis/Plat & Site Civil Design COMPLETE APPLICATION DATE: O 49 aS ACTIONS 0 `0 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DATE: 'tea i9%ag _ APPEALED. ❑ YES ❑ NO 2. 3. ❑ REVISION: ❑ RECORDING NO.: B. HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTIONS 0C 0 U 1. ❑ PREHEARING CONF. NOTICE date(s): 2. ❑ HEARING NOTICE date(s): 3 ❑ PREHEARING ORDER date(s): 4 ❑ CONTINUATION date(s): 5. ❑ EXAMINER'S REPORT date(s): 6 ❑ RECONSIDERATION date(s): T ❑ APPEAL SUMMARY date(s): DDES STAFF ACTIONS V Y!L PRELIMINARY REPORT / CONDITIONS date mailed: 2. ❑ CONTINUATION NOTICE date mailed: 3. ❑ ADDENDUM REPORT date mailed: 4. ❑ NOTICE OF APPEAL date received: 5. ❑ APPEAL ARGUMENTS date received: 6. ❑ TRANSMITTAL TO EXAMINER (POR'sIDOCSISTUDIES) date sent: (APPEALS ONLY) SEPA REQUIREMENTS 1. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: 2. DATE 500' RADIUSIAGENCIESIPORSISTAFF SENT: 3, APPEAL FILED: ❑ YES ❑ NO DATE ISSUED: a. APPELLANTS: Date Received: Date Received: b. APPEAL ARGUMENTS: Date Received: NOTICE REQUIREMENTS NOTIC OF APPLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING/POSTING PACKAGE SENT ! yr 0 � REC'D JLoglee b. LEGAL ADS: SEATTLE TIMES Date Published: c 73 09 LOCAL ()U n-al'1 Cp w Yk,� _ } Date Published: a 3 OC. 500' RADIUSIAGENCIESIPOR's/STAFF date(s) sent: V 2 '5F NOTICE OF DECISION Z)4-4�f �q �, 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: L07SO079 F. APPLICATION Date received: December 11, 2007 1. ❑ INTAKE CHECKLIST 2. ❑ APPLICATION FEE 3. APPLICANT DESIGNATION FORM 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5. ASSESSOR'S MAPS: A,,;6 39-23 -OS 6. CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY 7. CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY 8. PRELIMINARY HEALTH APPROVAL 9. ❑ CERTIFICATE OF FUTURE CONNECTION 10. FIRE DISTRICT RECEIPT 11, SITE PLAN/PLAT MAP 12. LEGAL LOT PROOF 13. AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE 14. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST— T 1Z 15. TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 16. LEVEL ONE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 17. 1 OTHER, 1&A &'V - L��c.�.[.V Z., 18. WAIVER(S)CJU � G. ADDITIONAL PLANS/MAPS DATES RECEIVED: 1. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN 2. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN 3_ REVISION NO. 1 4_ REVISION NO. 2 5. REVISION NO. 3 6. REVISION NO. 4 7. OTHER MAPS a) b) C) d) e) H. SPECIAL STUDIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. WETLAND/STREAM REPORT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TRAFFIC STUDY WILDLIFE STUDY OTHER (document title) DATES RECEIVED Page 2 of 3 41 L07SO079 I. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. a7. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. �� RTZMA` IW ME OJ - • L�.I < < 21. f /vim L.), a 1701 22. m A700,4 -7�0 �D. edsvy- 7 a 23. Lnc g dl97i 4 LO L,' 24. d :� dS � 25. 1 G�DC- f a 1a Off' 26. Uc.Q-�A' * At-€. 27. D g4. /Zpcvzf 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Page 3 of 3 L19 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Penton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov February 19, 2009 Jennifer Hennings Planning Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Preliminary Approval for Short_ Subdivision No.L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat Dear Ms. Hennings: The King County Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed its review of the above -noted short subdivision application. LUSD staff have determined the proposed short plat can comply with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), the Zoning Code (Title 21A), and other applicable codes referenced in KCC 19A.08.060. Pursuant to the provisions of the interlocal agreement between the City and our department for the review of pending applications in the Benson Heights annexation area, LUSD recommends this short subdivision be granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Enclosed you will find the following relevant documents: Draft Notice of Decision * Recommended Report and Decision * • Labels for Parties of Record and 500 foot radius list • Customer Information Bulletin #25 (You may wish to forward this document to the applicant with the decision to grant preliminary approval to the application.) If you have any questions or need additional documents from the file, please contact either Lanny Henoch Senior Project Manager, at 206-296-6632 or by e-mail at lanny.henoch[alkingcounty.gov or Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, at 206-296-7106 or by e-mail at curt. foster(a-36m cg ounty.gov. Following the completion of your review, please forward a copy of the City's decision to Mr. Henoch. The preliminary approval will be valid for the period of 60-months from the date of the decision. In addition, following the close of the appeal period, please send confirmation as to whether any appeals of the City's decision were filed, and a copy of any subsequent appeal decision issued by the City. ,3incerei teve Bo eirmrL Supervisor Moll . hn on PE Development Engine Current p4anning Section Supervisor, 'necring Review Section Land Use Services Division Land Use Services Division enclosures * An electronic copy of these documents will also be forwarded to the City. V L19 King County DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 F-11 C. Lenom REPORT AND DECISION SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L07SO079 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: This is a short subdivision of a 0.97-acre parcel into 6 lots for single family dwellings in the R-6 zone. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 5,000 to 7,000 square feet. Please see attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Applicant: Lenora Apartments, LLC Attn: Max Lissak 11121 NE 53rd Street Kirkland, WA 98033 Engineer: Dennis Alfredson Plat & Site Civil Design 37702 280th Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 STR: NW 33-23-05 Location: East side of 116th Avenue SE, 600 square feet south of SE Petrovitsky Road . Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: R-6 0.97 acre 6 6 du/acre Ranges from Approx Residential 5000 to 7000 sq. ft. Sewage Disposal: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Water Supply: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Fire District: King County Fire District 40 School District: Renton School District Application Vesting Date: December 11, 2007 HISTORY and BACKGROUND On November 6, 2007, the voters of Renton's Potential Annexation Area known as the "Benson Hill Communities Potential Annexation Area" approved a proposition to annex to the City of Renton. Effective March 1, 2008, the City approved an ordinance to accept the annexation area and all local governmental land use authority and Page , of a snort Plat jurisdiction with respect to the Annexation Area transferred from the County to the City upon the effective date. The City and the County approved execution of an Interlocal Agreement relating to the Annexation Area for the purpose of, in part, establishing the process and authority for discretionary decisions with respect to land use and permitting after the effective date of the annexation. Therefore, under the provisions of Section 2.3 of the agreement, the County has prepared this report and recommendation to the City's designated decision -maker for a final decision. The City is responsible for scheduling, providing notice, conducting any appeal hearings and making any final decision for this application. County staff will attend an appeal hearing to testify with respect to analysis set forth in the County's report and recommendation, if the application is appealed. The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on -site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant presented the Subdivision Technical Committee with a revised site plan on December 29, 2008. The modifications include: 1) elimination of the drainage facility and the provision of larger lots instead, 2) limiting the amount of impervious surface for each lot as provided by the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and 3) rearrangement of the lot lines. Originally, the applicant proposed to collect all drainage runoff from the development in the drainage facility to be constructed on the east side of the proposed plat within a separate drainage tract. The drainage pond was required to include a water quality facility for Sphagnum bog protection (see Section D.3 below). Because this option was not feasible, the applicant revised the project to instead, as provided by KCSWDM, limit the impervious improvements on each lot and provide drainage systems within each lot, using Best Management Practices (BMP). D. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The property is nearly flat with a slight downward gradient towards the northeast. 2. Soils: One soil type is found on this site per the1973 King County Soil Survey. The entire site is classified AgB. The following are AgB soil characteristics: 6_qB - Alderwood graveiy, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Hydrography: No Hydrographic features exist on the site. Two wetland reconnaissance reports were prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC dated September 2, 2008 and September 3, 2008. The first report evaluated the site for the presence of any hydrographic features, while the 2nd report determined if runoff from this development will reach the nearby wetland identified as the Soos Creek 2 Wetland, approximately one mile southeast of the site. Since this downstream wetland includes a bog component, the staff needed to determine if this proposal will be subject to 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for sphagnum bog protection. 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in pasture grasses. A few shrubs and trees are found on the edges of the site. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals may inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the property. Lenora Short Plat 4 L07SO079 6. Mapped Critical Areas: The Critical Areas Inventory identifies the inventoried Soos Creek Wetland 2 approximately one mile southeast and downstream of the site. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The site is located in a rapidly urbanizing area of the Soos Creek plateau in south King County. The site and the neighboring properties to the south, east and north are zoned Residential with a density of 6 dwelling units per acre (R-6). The residential density of the properties to the west across 116t Avenue is 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). The neighboring properties are developed with single-family residences, some with the potential for in -fill subdivisions. The site is currently vacant. F. DESIGN FEATURES Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed density and lot pattern meet the density requirements of the R-6 zone and are consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Code. The site and its surrounding properties are within the "urban" area, as designated by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. 2. Access/Roadway Section: The site is located along the east side of 116th Avenue Southeast, a minor arterial. The existing road frontage is a rural -type shoulder section that will be improved to current urban standards, including curb and sidewalk. The proposed six lots will be served by a Private Access Tract and a Joint Use Driveway Tract. A road variance for reduced intersection spacing along 116th Avenue Southeast, recommended for approval by King County (L08V0016), was approved by the City of Renton. 3. Drainage. The site is generally flat with a slight down slope towards the northeast. Existing stormwater runoff sheet flows to the north and northeast. Most of the runoff leaves the site near the northeast corner of the site. The drainage then flows north toward the Petrovitsky Road storm drainage system. Flows eventually discharge into Soos Creek, which flows past a sphagnum bog within Soos Creek 2 Wetland. The applicant proposes to restrict building and driveway footprints on each lot in order to limit the new impervious surface areas below the 10,000 square foot threshold, as set by KCSWDM for Small Project Drainage Review. This eliminates the need for construction of one drainage facility for the entire project. Storm drainage will be provided by Small Project Best Management Practices (SPBMP's). The Level 1 Downstream Analysis did not identify any flooding or drainage problems downstream from the site. 4. Other Design Features: The proposal includes a 2,351 square foot recreation tract. This meets the required recreation space for this project. The applicant will be required to improve the tract with play equipment and landscaping. See Section G.5 below. G. PUBLIC SERVICES Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated November 14, 2007, indicates this sewer district's capability to serve the proposed development. 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated November 14, 2007, indicates this water district's capability to serve the proposed development. 3. School facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by Benson Hill Lenora Short Plat L07SO079 Elementary, Nelson Junior High, and Lindberg Senior High Schools, all located within the Renton School District. 4. School Access: The District has indicated that future students from this subdivision will walk to the elementary school. The students from this development will be bussed to both the junior and senior high schools. The school bus pick-up location is at the intersection of 116th Avenue SE and SE 178th Place. There are paved shoulders separated by markings from the travel lane along both sides of 116th Avenue SE. Additionally, there is a crosswalk in front of the elementary school. 5. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is Soos Creek Park and Trail, located about a mile east of the site. KCC 21A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on -site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The applicant is proposing a 2,351 square foot tract for recreation space. KCC 21A.14.190 requires subdivisions to provide tot/children play areas within the recreation space on -site. The proposed recreation tract dimension along the access road is less than 30 feet in width. This needs to be revised to comply with KCC21A.14.180C. As proposed, the area within the panhandle section of the recreation tract cannot be counted towards the required area. The recreation tract must be revised to either leave a 30-foot wide frontage with the road or add additional area to the tract. The recreation tract must be improved and landscaped, see Condition 9 below. H. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This short subdivision application is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (i.e. 2007 King County Road Standards, 2005 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approval. J. DECISION: The proposed short plat revised and received December 29, 2008 (Attachment 1) is granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: KCC Title 19A — This short plat shall comply with all of the Land Segregation provisions of KCC Title 19A: A. The final short subdivision recording documents must be prepared by a professional land surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington. These documents shall comply with the conditions of approval listed in this letter. B. The final review process must be completed prior to the recording of the short subdivision or the sale of any lots contained within. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) strongly recommends that the Final Short Plat review package be submitted to the department at least one year prior to the expiration date of the relimina approval letter. C. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. Lenora Short Plat 4 L07SO079 D. All utilities within proposed rights -of -way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording. E. Prior to recording, KCC 19A.08.160 requires that the following site work is completed: 1) Erosion control measures are consistent with K.C.C. 9.04.0901 2) Water mains and hydrants (if required) are installed and fire flow is available; 3) Specific required site improvements are completed prior to the recording and all safety hazards are removed. 2. 2007 Kin; County Road Design & Construction Standards Roadway improvements are required to address access requirements and impacts to existing roads and right-of-way. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the 2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 15753, as amended (KCRDCS). The proposed short subdivision shall comply with the KCRDCS including the following requirements, unless otherwise approved by DDES. The extent of improvements as outlined below, requires submittal of engineering plan and profiles and appropriate review fees. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington and contain the applicable elements outlined in KCRDCS and/or the 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (see Section 2.2.2). Please note that the applicant should submit the plans a minimum of one year prior to the preliminary approval expiration date. A. A road variance application regarding intersection spacing was recommended for approval by King County on May 12, 2008 (File No. L08V0016). The City of Renton agreed with the county recommendation on May 21, 2008. The final engineering plans for the short plat shall be consistent with the road variance decision, see Attachment 2). B. 116th Avenue SE is classified as a minor arterial street (KCRDCS, Section 2.03(A)). Urban frontage improvements including curb and sidewalk shall be constructed along the frontage of this road, consistent with a 3 lane ultimate road design with bike lane. C. A full width street overlay is required for pavement widening unless otherwise approved by the City of Renton (KCRDCS 4.03). D. Tract A shall be designed as a Private Access Tract (PAT). All lots shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for its maintenance. Per KCRDCS 2.09(B), the PAT shall have a minimum width of 20-feet and a maximum length of 150 feet. Pavement width shal be a minimum of 18-feet including curb (rolled, extruded or thickened edge) and gutter. The PAT shall meet geometric design criteria for minor access streets including 25-foot property line radii. NOTE: A driveway drop shall be used in lieu of a curb return. E. Direct access to 116th Avenue SE is prohibited to and from abutting Lots 1 and 6 (KCRDCS 2.03(A)). Access shall be by means of the PAT. A note to this effect shall appear on the recorded short plat. The existing driveway shall be removed and the area restored. F. Tract B shall be designed as a Joint Use Driveway Tract (JUDT) with a private joint use driveway serving proposed lots 3 and 4 only. These lots shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for its maintenance. As specified in KCRDCS 3.01(C), the tract width shall be a 1_ rar cartPlat L07SO0 7 9 minimum of 20-feet and shall contain an 18-foot wide paved driving surface with cross slope in one direction and curb or thickened edge on one side. Please refer to DDES application packets at: http://www.kingcounty.gov/property/perm_its/ ubIications/forms.aspx for detailed information on driveway connections. G. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated along the116th Avenue Southeast property frontage to provide 42 feet from the centerline of the road, per KCRDCS 2.03(A). H. The intersection of the site access road with 116th Avenue Southeast shall be designed consistent with KCRDCS Section 2.10 with minimum stopping sight distance (Sec. 2.12 KCRDCS). Minimum entering sight distance shall be provided and verified (Sec. 2.13 KCRDCS). Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRDCS Sec.5.05. J. Power poles located along the road frontage appear to fall within the minimum clear zone for safety (KCRDCS Section 5.10). Field verification prior to final plat approval is required to confirm compliance with the above spacing requirement. Utility poles which do not comply with KCRDCS 5.10 shall be relocated unless a variance is granted to maintain the existing location. Please be advised that per KCRDCS Section 8.01 C, only the utility company (pole owner) is permitted to submit the variance application. K. Driveway connections shall be constructed according to KCRDCS, Section 3.01 and as shown on drawing 3-004. Please refer to DDES application packets at http://www.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/publications/forms.aspx for detailed information on driveway connections. L. The PAT and JUDT improvements shall be constructed prior to final plat approval in order to verify total impervious surface coverage. M. Impervious surface shall be limited on each lot. The total amount of building and driveway footprint allowed on all lots combined shall be no greater than 21,166 square feet minus the area of the PAT access, JUD and offsite improvements. The amount allocated to each lot for building and driveway shall be clearly stated on the face of the final recorded short plat. N. Modifications to the above road improvement conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRDCS, Section 1.12. Any request for a road variance shall be submitted to DDES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. Other engineering details that may be shown on the preliminary site plan with the exception of the above may not have been reviewed for compliance with KCRDCS. If differences exist, the final design shall be modified to meet KCRDCS. 3. Surface Water Management and Control (Title 9 KCC), 2005 King Count Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM): The extent of the proposed and conditioned improvements for this short plat qualify for Small Project drainage review, as outlined in the KCSWDM Section 1.1.2.1. A. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are required for the new impervious surface (frontage improvements, driveways and new houses) created with this project, unless otherwise approved by DDES. The review shall be included with the final platting submittal package (Title 19A). Alternatively, the lot improvements may be submitted and reviewed separately at the building permit stage. Lenora Short Plat 6 L07SO079 B. Per the Small Project drainage review this project may create no more than 10,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces. The final recorded map page shall include the maximum new impervious surface allowed on each lot. Failure to comply with the requirements for Small Project drainage review will require a short plat revision and Full Drainage review, to include formal flow control and water quality facilities in accordance with Conservation Flow Control and Sphagnum Bog Protection standards. C. To implement the required BMPs for treatment of storm water, the final plans and technical information report (TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. As described in Chapter 5 of the drainage manual, a subdivision project may implement the required BMPs or defer the lot BMP requirements until future review of building permits. In either case, the final plans shall clearly indicate the applicable BMP standards and requirements for implementation on the recorded plat. D. If the subdivision applicant chooses to defer implementation of lot BMPs to the building permit process, the following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Permit applications for buildings or other improvements constructed on lots created by this subdivision must be reviewed by King County for compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other applicable drainage standards as specified in the KCSWDM. As determined by King County, the permit applicant for each lot must prepare a drainage site plan with procedures for design and maintenance details, and record a declaration of covenant and grant of easement for implementation of the BMPs. " E. Consistent with authority and procedures outlined in Chapter 1.4 of the KCSWDM, drainage adjustments to any of the above requirements may be considered. Adjustments shall be submitted to DDES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. 4. Site Improvement Inspections, Fees & Financial Guarantees ( Title 19 & 27 This short plat is conditioned to construct road access and right-of-way improvements. Approved engineering plans, inspection fee and applicable financial guarantees are required prior to either starting construction or recording this short plat. At the time of engineering plan approval, the applicant will be notified of the fee amount that will be required to inspect construction. That amount shall be deposited with DDES, as well as the financial guarantee amount(s). These amounts shall be deposited with DDES prior to scheduling of the pre -construction meeting. Please note that the pre -construction meeting is mandatory prior to the start of any work (including site clearing) or the recording of the short plat. 5. Health KCC 13) - This project is exempt from further King County Health Department review. However, if improvements are required by the sewer and/or water purveyor to serve the lots in this short plat, then written documentation shall be provided from said purveyor(s) to verify that the required improvements have been bonded and/or installed, and all necessary easements have been provided, prior to final recording of the short plat. 6. Building and Construction Standards Title 16) - The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC Chapter 16.82, including KCC 16.82.156 concerning the preservation of "significant trees" on short subdivisions located in the King County "Urban" designated area. A detailed tree retention plan, which complies with KCC 16.82.156B2 and other applicable requirements of this Code section, shall be submitted to DDES for review and approval prior to engineering plan approval (if required), or prior to final short plat approval where engineering Lenora Shari Flat L07S0079 plans are not required. Bonding may be required by DDES to assure implementation of the tree retention/replacement plan. No clearing or grading adin_g of the site shall occur until DDES approves the detailed tree retention plan and engineering plans where required). 7. Fire Code KCC 17 -Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code - Any future residence constructed on lots 2 through 5 within this short plat shall be sprinkled (NFPA 13D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Section 503 of the International Fire Code (IFC) requires all portions of the exterior walls of buildings (at grade) to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the structure) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved access is a minimum 20-foot wide unobstructed driving surface that is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end. Parked vehicles are an obstruction. See Attachment 3. 8. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 9. Recreation Tract KCC 21A.14.180 At a minimum, a 2,340 square -foot recreation tract shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180. The proposed recreation tract shall be revised to either allow for a 30-foot wide frontage with the private access tract or add additional area to the recreation tract. The improvements shall be consistent with KCC 21A.14.190 and KCC 21A.16 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, landscaping, etc.). The following shall be provided: A. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscaping in accordance with 21A.16, equipment specs, fencing, etc.) with appropriate fees shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. The recreation plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and finished grade. B. A 4-foot tall split rail (see through) fence shall be provided between the lots and the recreation tract to distinguish the public areas from the private lots. A solid fence may be provided along the north boundary of the tract. C. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. D. A homeowner's association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DDES to provide for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation tract and the Private Access Tract. 10. Street Trees KCC 21A.16) - Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): A. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. Lenora Short Plat 8 L07SO079 C. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. D. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. E. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit -bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. F. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. G. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if 116th Avenue SE is on a bus route. If it is on a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. H. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within two years of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for two years. After two years, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 11. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." Or B. Pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit, an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances. B. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. Lenora Shoe! Flat 9 L07SO079 Parties and Persons of interest: ALFREDSON DENNIS PLAT & SITE CIVIL DES LLC 37702 280TH PL SE ENUMCLAW WA 98022 BOTTHEIM STEVE SUPERVISOR CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 BUCKMEIER LLOYD M 16547 121ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 COSORUS JOSEPH PO BOX 59593 RENTON WA 98058 DEHKORDI FERESHTEH PROD MANAGER CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 FGMU FOSTER CURT SR ENGR ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 HENOCH LANNY PPMIII CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 JOHNSON MOLLY MANAGING ENGR ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 LISSAK MAX LENORA APARTMENTS LLC 11121 NE 53RD ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 MORROW PAUL DMP INC 726 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN WA 96002 TOWNSEND STEVE SUPERVISOR LUIS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 WHITING KELLY KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 Lenora Short Plat 1() L07SO079 RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20,24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on ( to be determined by the City). Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre -hearing conference. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre -hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Lenora Short Plat I I L07SO079 �3' COxC�r D m = � f= o -r! m Z G) m NW 114. S 33, T 23 N, R 05 E. W.M., bnrW ARE x0 H[ Y4-if4 ANd I COM OF 99ffXAVT = PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ACREAGE: 0.97 NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED; B 00STWG ZONE: R-6 PROPOSED USE:SNGLE FAMILY RESDENTiAL SEWER DISTRICT: SODS CREEK WATER L: SEWER WATER DISTRICT: SODS CREEK WATER & SEWER SCHOOL DISTRICT: RENTON #403 FIRE DISTRICT. WO CO. FIRE PROTECTION GIST. 40 TELEPHONE SERVICES: OWEST POWER SOURCE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY WATER QUALITY TREATMENT STANDARD: BASC FLOW CONTROL STANDARD: CONSERVATION BUILDING SETBACKS: SIDE: 5' REAR: e FRONT: 10' GARAGE: 20' T3CeT����fY�T�t�.1 LOT 5 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1948040137M397. NOTES: FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED IN HOUSES ON LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, CONTOURS SHOWN ARE BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY. 'a MIL i R • d i L J H IL o Q L W G a f Q } Z Jul ik E .00 U J Q E� LL W Ta a Z W J 3kordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision -----Original Message ----- From. Kayren Kittrick [mailto:Kkittrick@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May21, 2008 2:42 PM To: Sanders, Jim Subject: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision Dear Mr. Sanders: Regarding Lenora Short Subdivision (L07S0079 and L48V4415) The City of Renton agrees with the recommendations from staff and approves the variance as written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely., Kayren K. Kittrick Development Eng. Supervisor Permits & Inspections Development Services Division (425) 430-7299 1 ATTACHMENT 2— t -OF 3 PAGE PAGE King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-•7217 www.kingoounty.gov May 12, 2008 Jennifer Toth Henning, AICP Planning Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Road Variance Recommendation to the City of Renton Lenora Short Subdivision (Files L07SO079 and LOSVO1016) Dear Ms. Henning: King County is currently reviewing the Lenora preliminary short plat application pursuant to terms of the interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County. The project site is located in an area recently annexed by the City of Renton. During our review of the subdivision, the applicant submitted the enclosed road variance application regarding intersection spacing along 116 h Ave SE. To continue our review of the preliminary short plat, a decision by the City of Renton is required for the road variance application. The following summary provides a description of the site issues and a recommendation for the road variance. Findinlas: 1. The proposed short plat is located on the east side of 116 h Ave SE which is classified by King County as an urban minor arterial street. As outlined in the 2007 King County Road Standards, this arterial classification requires 500 feet of spacing between intersections. 2. Road access for the subdivision is proposed as a private tract serving 6 lots. The new private road entrance is located on the east side of 116"' Ave SE and is approximately 197 feet north of the existing intersection at 178t' Place SE. Driveway access to the lots will be restricted to. Road A without having direct driveway access to the arterial street. The private road entrance will be designed with a driveway cut along the curb rather than using curb radius. This type of entrance design will better define the roadway entry as private and reduce the number of public road intersections along 116t' Ave SE. 3. The Lenora short plat has adequate vehicular sight distance along 116d' Ave SE and the road frontage for the short plat will be improved to the urban arterial standards. 4. Evaluation of the site access has not identified any specific traffic hazards and the new road entrance is not expected to create problems with vehicular turning movements. ATTACHMENT 2 I- OF -3 PAGE PAGE Jennifer Toth Henning May 12, 2008 Page 2 I Recommendation: King County recommends approval of the variance application for reduced intersection spacing. The proposed road entrance provides 197 feet_ of spacing from the nearest intersection at 178 h Place SE. Traffic safety issues have not been identified during our review of the short plat. The enclosed variance application includes a site plan and parcel mapping prepared by the applicant. The applicant did not provide a specific traffic analysis or evaluation of site .access for the project. If the City of Renton determines the road designs are consistent with Renton regulations and/or design policies, the County recommends approval of the road variance. If you have questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 296- 7178 or via email at jim.sanders0kingcounty gov. i nc y, H. Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Enclosure: Road Variance File L08V0016 cc: Peter Dye Fereshteh Dehkordi ATTACHMENT � 3 OF 3 PAGE PAGE LENORA 6 - LOT SHORT PLAT Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Numbers: L07SO079 02/05/08 Fire Engineering approval may be granted with the following conditions: AA01 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineering. Telephone: (206) 296-6785 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted with the following condition: **** SPRINKLERS REQUIRED **** Any future residence constructed on lots 2 through 5 within this short plat shall be sprinkled (NFPA 13D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Section 503 of the International Fire Code (IFC) requires all portions of the exterior walls of buildings (at grade) to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the structure) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved access is a minimum 20-foot wide unobstructed driving surface that is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end. Parked vehicles are an obstruction. To remove the sprinkler requirement it will be necessary to provide a minimum 20- foot wide unobstructed driving surface on Road A and the private driveway access tract. To accomplish this the curb -to -curb width of Road A and the driveway tract will have to be increased to 36 feet if parking is allowed on both sides or 28 feet if one side of the roadway is designated as a fire lane by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Fire System Review Approval Conditions Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT � PAGE. PAGE L19 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 266-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov January 11, 2008 Max Lissak Lenora Apartments, LLC 11121 NE 43rd Street Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Notice of Complete Application for Time Periods Lenora Short Plat Application No. L07SO079 Date Filed: December 11, 2007 Dear Mr. Lissak: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on January 9, 2008 the Land Use Services Division determined that the above -referenced application is complete under current requirements for a complete application. This initial determination is intended only for the purpose of applying the time periods for permit processing specified in Ordinance 12196. Supplemental information may be requested by the Division, as necessary, for the continued review of your application. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review your project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. The timeline can also be impacted by one or more of the following: • any request made by the Division for additional information • changes or revisions requested by the applicant • mutually -agreed -upon requests to stop the time clock • preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement • failure to post the property * resolution of land use decisions appeals If you have any questions about your application or the posting requirements, please contact me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, / Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Site Plan Review Section Enclosures cc: Paul Morrow, PMP, Inc. Applicant's Consulting Engineer King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat DDES Project Number AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, , hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application ❑ Other on the day of , 2008, in accordance with the Department of Development and E ironmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 2) 3) hereby affirm t* ffie above is a true and correct statement. Sign This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Package Notice of Application Posting package mailed 01/11/08 to Max LissakiLenora Apartments L07SO079 11121 NE 43rd Street, Kirkland, WA 98033 In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you will find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. The sign must be up and notices posted 14 days from the date of the complete application letter. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope (containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. The sign must not obstruct the view of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. Immediatelv upon completion of the above instructions, complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Division Current Planning Section, at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting requirements may be cause for a delav in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements -Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LUSD return envelope n King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-8212 L07SO079 Lenora Short Prat DDES Project Number (print name) X Notice of Permit Application ❑ Other AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING hereby affirm that I have posted the following: on the day of , 2008, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) 2) 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. Standards for Locating and Installing Notice Board The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: ONE ( 1 ) Notice board shall be located: On the west side of the property facing 116t' Avenue SE, and: • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility. • At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade. • So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians and does not obstruct the view of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION jTo Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Short Subdivision Proposal: Subdivide .97 acre parcel into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone File No.: L07SO079 NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 pg 2 0 (i) King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington98057-5212 NOTICE BOARD REQUIREMENTS - NOTICE OF APPLICATION Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8%" x 14' laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT O NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 Moe, Judi From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:14 AM To: Moe, Judi Subject: L07SO079 Attachments: L07S0079NOA.doc Judi: Please mail this NOA on Friday January 11 th and request that the applicant place a sign on the west side of his property facing 116th Avenue SE Thanks Fereshteh L07S0079NOA.dm (57 KB) it REPRESENTING THE $-t'atltPoo nteffigencE'x Re Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad # 759337000 Ad TEXT:KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (ODES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057.5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat Fila: L07S0079 Applicant: Max Lissak Location: 17802 -116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide .97 acres Into 6 residential lots Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will Issue a decision on this application following a 21- day comment period ending on February 19, 2008. Written com ments and additional informs lion can be obtained by contact Ing the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 23rd day of January, 2008 MAIN FILE COPY REPRESENTING THE $mUlt$lost nttftiqc_ncer PO Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111 K C /DEV & ENVIRON ATTN CAROL WOOD 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 Re: Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad #: 759337000 Affidavit of Publication 3857889 / 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish The undersigned, on oath states that he/she is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distributed to its subscribers during all of the said period. Agent Manly. PeredO Signature _PL �111III Subscribed and sworn to before me on S10 (DATE) � f U � '�o7a,�� (NOTARY SIGNATURE) Notary Public in and for the State of WashirrotgA,�esidinpLq,Sea#tte aP WWk\''G Illk\�� STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION _ KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC NOTICE & ENVIRONMENTAL ES) SERVICES (DDLinda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA Advertising Representative of the 98057-5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST SHORT Plat File: L07S0079 Renton Reporter Applicant: Max Lissak Location: 17802 — 116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide .97 acres into 6 a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of residential lot; Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months 206-296-7173 prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in COMMENT PROCEDURES:DDES will issue a decisionononon tthis application the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King following a 21-day comment period ending County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as on February 19, 2008. Written comments a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone Washington for King County. number listed above. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues Published in the Renton Reporter on January 23, 2008.440305 of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on January 23, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $142.88. `.\,\\\\%\%Iti l l Il+l��rr Fxn/4 ',,y� rr'r Inda M. Mills = r ; O Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter o z Subscribed and sworn to me this 25th day of January, 2008. g 01 a athy Dals rotary Public Yr the State of Washington, Residing in Covingt n, Washington P. Q. Number: Legal Ad Request Pagel of 2 Moe, Judi From: Legals [legals@seattletimes.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:01 PM To: Moe, Judi Subject: RE: Legal Ad Request Hi Judi, Your legal notice for L07SO079 is scheduled to run on Wednesday 1/23 in the SEattle Times on.AD# 3857889 costing $51.60. Thank you, Kathy Baldwin Legals Account Executive Seattle Times representing The Post Intelligencer Phone: 206-652-6018 Fax: 206-515-5595 Email: legals@seattletimes.com From: Moe, Judi[maiIto:]udi.Moe@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:18 AM To: Legals; legals@kc}n.com Subject: Legal Ad Request Linda, please publish in the Renton Reporter. Thank you, Judi Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on January 23, 2008, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to DDES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98067-3212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat File: L07SO079 Applicant: Max Lissak 1• 01/11/2008 Legal Ad Request Page 2 of 2 Location: 17802 — 116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide .97 acres into 6 residential lots Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on February 19,2008. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 23rd day of January, 2008 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ DDES Application File: L07SO079 S.Times Acct.No.: 078871004 01 / 11 /2008 Page 1 of 2 Moe, Judi From: Linda Mills [Imiils@reporternewspapers.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:26 AM To: Moe, Judi Subject: Re: Legal Ad Request Good Morning, I have received your notice (re: file # L07S0079) to be published in the Renton Reporter on Wednesday, January 23, 2008. Thank you, Linda Early Deadlines MLK Holiday: Reporters Jan 23rd - deadlines 10am 01-17 Mercer Island Jan 23rd - deadlines 10am 01-16 Snoqualmie Valley Jan 23rd - deadlines 2 pm 01-16 Linda Mills Legal Advertising/Obituary Representative Reporter Newspapers - Sound Publishing 19426 68th Ave. So Ste A Kent, Wa 98032 253-234-3506 legals@reporternewspapers.com or paidobits@reporternewspapers.com From: Moe, Judi[malito:Judi.Moe@kingcounty.gov] To: legals@seattletimes.com, legals@kcjn.com Sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:18:23 -0800 Subject: Legal Ad Request Linda, please publish in the Renton Reporter. Thank you, Judi Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on January 23, 2008, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to DDES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat File: L07SO079 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2 Applicant: Max Lissak Location: 17802 —116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide .97 acres into 6 residential lots Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on FebruaN 19,_2008. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 23rd day of January, 2008 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ DDES Application File: L07SO079 S.Times Acct.No.: 078871004 01 /10/2008 Page 1 of l �,� Cities in a ZIP Code may be referred to by more than one name or spelling. These results indicate the actual city name. ("Not Acceptable" city names are listed for your reference only --- do not use.) Actual City name in 98058 RENTON, WA Not Acceptable CASCADE, WA FAIRWOOD, WA Related Links Calculate Postage Calculate postage for your letter or package online! Rake Calculator Print Shipping Labels Print shipping labels from your desktop and pay online Click-N-ShipO Other Postage Business or Residence Lookup Yellow_Page_s Find a business nationwide. White Pages Find a residence nationwide. 6Etemap Contact us Form4 Gov't Services ,lobs Privacy FQH Tams of Use Netionaf & PrernierAccaunts Page I of 2 LQ King County DDES Parcel Information Report -Charge Report - This report was generated: 12/15/2007 4:26:03 PM Print Fi:epart Parcel Number: 6196600100 -Change Report Parcels- (1) o Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600100 Tax Payer: BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Pending) ]urisdiction: King County Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 Postal City a Reference Info Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 5 Plat Block: 1 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 42,447 SgFt. (0.97 Acres) a Planning Info The information included in this report has been compiled by King Cou staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. K County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such informati King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained in I report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report is prohibi except by written permission of King County. DIV NO. 01 Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: urn Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2005 - $84,000, 2006 - $140,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 - $147,000, 2006 - $109,000 i3 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council. N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS Zone. 342 ($3,765) Roads Transportation Conculrrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System. WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Page 2 of 2 Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A e Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Meins s Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: N/A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None GIs Mapping Operations (GISMO) Version 1.2 Saturday, Dec 15, 2047 03:31 PM User: GOLLS Computer: DE235346 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 Kin County department of I]evelo anent and Environmental Services t-and Use Services Division 900 Oakesdaie Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Applicant: Max Lissak Lenora Apartments 11121 NE 43rd Street Kirkland, WA 98033 Engineer: PMP, Inc Paul Morrow 726 Auburn Way N Auburn, WA 98002 Notice of Application (Type 2) File No: L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat DDES Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi Telephone No.: (206) 296-7173 Email: fereshteh.dehkordi@kingcounty.gov Date Application Filed: December 11, 2007 Date Determined Complete: January 9, 2008 Project Location: 17802 - 116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton #A Project Description: Subdivision of a .97-acre parcel into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone. Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above address: NIA Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A.19A, KCC 21A. KCSWDM and KCRS Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and Critical Areas Codes. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on February 19, 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DDES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DDES decision. However, the DDES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision_ Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing: January 25, 2008 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No.: L07SO079 .Please print) ame, Address Telephone No.: King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal Type2 NOA 1 � 0 NWIAS33.T23N,R06E,W.M., { II f ,�Ws � 1 .�I`I wsnuc wsr ,a �vr L•nrs .w, , cm.a aF srcx�c+xr aa. ss-11�4 RECREATION IL — — ' — L- — "— --- f I _ TRACT W I — — — - — I I — — � ! I _-�- PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE: 4.97 NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED- 6 E)OSTING ZONE: R-6 `- PROPOSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL m ROAD A l \ Z 1 SEWER DfSTRICT: WOO CREEK WATER & SERER pQ \ ` J �0 WATER DISTRICT: SODS CREEK WATER & SEWER g PRNATE ACCESS TRACT {7 Sc'HOQL 015TRICI: RENTON #403 1 L7 FIRE DISTRICL: RING CO- FIR£ PROTECnON DIST. 40 recN'owo AccEss iELERNOiJE SERNCES: OWEST W ei�sr. E ci.isr I C) F PDWER SOURCE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY-------------_'------ — 'NATER OUALfFY TREATMENT STANDARp: ,9ASICFLOW CONTROL 37ANDAPD: CONSERVATION 0`.� � 't ©UILDING 5ET9ACK5 ` 5 I 4 ' SIDE: 5' -1 5- REAR: s' ? Fl t I I I I FRONT: 10' C�,11 m GARAGE: 20' F� ca i LEGAL DESCRIPTION Qu I�J7 a LOT 5 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS a Q PAS;0N 1, RECCRDED UNDER RECORDING NUMOEA 194SD4013788397, 3P r•w.` 1 4 H IL g � F- N o Q a � � z a:;; D n g DEC 112007 d It a 0. If K.C. D.D.E.S. Lo"7 5oo7 9 SNEET I eK 2 V) Ndtice (i) King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 of Application (Type 2) Applicant: Max Lissak File No: L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat Lenora Apartments 11121 NE 43rd Street DDES Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone No.: (206) 296-7173 Email: fereshteh.dehkordi@kingcounty.gov Engineer: PMP, Inc Paul Morrow Date Application Filed: December 11, 2007 726 Auburn Way N Date Determined Complete: January 9, 2008 Auburn, WA 98002 Project Location: 17802 - 116th Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Project Description: Subdivision of a .97-acre parcel into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone. Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above address: NIA Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A.19A, KCC 21A. KCSWDM and KCRS Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and Critical Areas Codes. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on February, 19, 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DDES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DDES decision. However, the DDES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY), Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing: January 26, 2008 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No.: L07SO079 Please print) Name: Address: Telephone No.: King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal Type2 NOA ea NW 114. S 33, T 23 N. R 65 E. W.M., � I 1 I I � r I � [xiSlkG MY i0 NK WHFS Nb � cYnu: a S'��C_'�M! 5�2C f ui a B I� 1I [% 1 I I I I 2 ! ` - I _ 3 I Ecr�anor ` —- — -- — — --- — . _] L TAAcT II ROAD A - PIMATE ACCESS TRACT Q FrC"ACCESS l i I 4 I L._— — —— -r •N . 4I I w g PROJECT JESCRiPTIVN: _ - ACREAGE: 0.97 NUMBER GF LOTS PROPOSEC' S EXISTING ZONE: R-E 1; PRCPGSED USE -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SEWER DISTRICT_ SCOS CREEK WATER h SEWER m WATER DISTRICT, SOCS CREEK WATER & SEWER - SCHOOL DISTRICT, RENTON #4U3 FIRE D151RICT- KING f:0. FIRF PROiEC110N E•IS1 4J TELEPHONE SERNCES: OWES° I POWER SOURCE: PUGET SUM) LNERGY -� -j WATER QUALITY TREATMENT STANDARD- PA51('. 0 I' FLOW CONTROL STANDARD :OKSERUATION rn DJILDING SETBAC1<7, w 0 SIDE: 5' -2 `� J REAR: 5' > ' FROHP. lC' Uw GARAGE- 7O' F Chas 3 q � LEGAL DESCRIPTION z It oW LOT 5 OF NORTHWESTERN :ARHN TRACI`S 11 ° DIVISION 1. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 194804013786397 F I J d a 8 � HN o d a� a DEC 11 2007 a W 'U w � � d K.C. D.D. E.S. �n1ri z L_o-7 S oo 7 9 SMELT I OF 1 .s 5061 � K)-h cy— l; N) p 5648600040[L07S0079 AU KWOK KWAN+PUI CHUN 17624 114TIl PL SF RENTON WA 98055 5648600120/1-07S0079 BROWN NATALIA L+FREDRICK 17724 114TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 3223059071JL07S0079 CAMPBELL CYNTHIA L 1 ] 525 SE 176TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RN/L07S0079 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 3223059354/L07S0079 DAYTON ANDREW J 15704 121 ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600480/L07S0079 EDWARDS JAMES+LISA 17812 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6196600440/L07S0079 GOUGH THOMAS+SHIRLEY 17644 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 3223059261/1,07S0079 HEEB LEON A 11509 SE 178TH PL RENTON WA 98055 5648600170/L07S0079 HOANG LANG AN 11411 SE 178TH PL RENTON WA 98055 6196600100/1-07S0079 BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE 16721 SE NEWPORT WAY ISSAQUAH WA 98027 6196600120/1,07S0079 BUCKMEIER LLOYD M+MARLENE J 16547 121ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600060/L07S0079 CARLSON SHEILA H 17702 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600022/L07S0079 COSORUSJOSEPH PO BOX 59593 RENTON WA 98058 6196600285/L07S0079 DIAS W ILLIAM R & JUDY K 17809 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600521/L07S0079 FLORENCE GORDON J 17852 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 564860018011,07S0079 HAGOS LECHOM 17818 114TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 5648600020/L07S0079 HICKS RICHARD 1 ] 408 SE 177TH PL RENTON WA 98055 6196600219/1,07S0079 HOLMGREN CHRIS S+CYNTHIA L ] 7845 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 3223059258[L07S0079 BROWN MARIE KURKA- 17811 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 322305929111,07S0079 13UF.,NBRAZO ROLANDO SR+BETTY 17721 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600260/1.07S0079 CHIDESTER JEFFRRY PARKER CHIDESTER VICI 18450 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600062/L07S0079 CURRAN BONNIE B 22300 SE 198TI-I PL MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 5648600130/1,07S0079 EAM VANNDY+DENISE 17802 114TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 6196600180IL07S0079 GILL JAGDEV S+SUKHWANT K 1 ] 620 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 619660002011,07S0079 14ARKLESS DAVE 17610 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 3223059351/1,07S0079 HO DUNG & NGUYEN QUYEN 17911 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6196600465/L07S0079 HOLT TIMOTHY & KERRY 17806 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 5648600140/L07S0079 3223059276IL07S0079 6196600061/L07S0079 HUYNH DANH N IDDINGS CATHLEEN M JOHNSON JEFFERY M 11410 SE 179TH PL 11510 SE 178TH PL 17624 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 3223059108/1-07S0079 5648600100/1.07S0079 6196600421/L07S0079 ]ONES CYNTHIA F KONG JOHN MAU CHO MANIPON JEFFREY+RANIE 11504 SL 178TH PL 17720 114TH PL SE 17632 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 5648600110IL07SO079 3223059180/1-07S0079 6196600481IL07SO079 MARTIN NORMA+TERRY MATHESON STACEE L MCGOUGH JEFFRY A & CYNTHIA 17728 114TH PL SE 17905 116TH AVE SE 17832 118TH AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 5648600090/1,07S0079 6196600080/L07S0079 6196600280/L07S0079 MELNICHUK ALEXANDR MELVILLE WESLEY A JR MITCHELL H W 17722 114TH PL SE 17718 116TH AVE SE 17803 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 5648600160/1.079079 5648600050/L07S0079 6196600420/L07S0079 MORALES FIL B+VICKY B MORALES JOEL B MORGAN MAE L 17812 114TH PL SE 17704 114TH PL SE 17638 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 3223059109/L07S0079 3223059253IL07SO079 3223059255IL07SO079 MOTA WILLIAM ROLANDO NAUDITT PATRICIA K NEWSCHWANDER BARRY J 1503 SE 178TH PL 11515 SE 178TH PL 2641 36TH AVE W RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98199 6196600221/1,07S0079 3223059353/L07S0079 5648600060IL07SO079 O'KEEFE ROGER G PETERSEN KEVIN A+ALYSSA B PHAM ANH H+HOANG DUC TH1 17853 118TH AVE SE 17907 116TH AVE SE 11409 SE 177TH PL RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SDI 3/LA7S0079 5648600070/L07S0079 3223059112/1-07S0079 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 PHAM LIEM THANH+HONG THI LE PURVIANCE SCOTT E+MYERS JEA R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 17710 114TH PL SE 17803 116TH AVE SE 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 6196600361/1,07S0079 3223059179/1-07S0079 3223059110/1,07S0079 RETTINGER MICHA M RIVAS VICTORIA ROLAND MARY JEAN 17611 118TH AVE SE 17917 116TH AVE SE 17913 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 6196600240IL07SO079 61966000211L07S0079 6196600023IL07SO079 ROYER WILSON MILLER SALDANA NICOLAS SANCHEZ-GALVEZ RENE 17831 118TH AVE SE 11603 SE PETROVITSKY RD 11625 SE PETROVITSKY RD RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 6196600460/L07S0079 5648600080/1,07S0079 3223059211IL07SO079 SCHULZ RICHARD L+DEBRA D SIU YIN MAY SMITH KARL D 17902 118TH AVE SE 17714 114TH PL SE PO BOX 39 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 FREELAND WA 98249 . . ' t 3223059181/L07S0079 3223059352IL07SO079 SPISAK RUBY L STREIFEL MARION O+JOHN J 17931 116TH AVE SE 17909 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 6196600520/L07S0079 6196600300/L07S0079 TRAN BRENDA N VENABLE HAROLD L+HELEN 12055 SE 178TH ST 17645 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 6196600320/L07S0079 6196600325/L07S0079 VERMA SUNIL K VERMA SUNIL K 17633 118TH AVE SE 17633 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 5648600190/L07S0079 6196600165/L07S0079 VU GARY WEBSTER GARRY+KIRSTEN 15832 SE 133RD PL 17906 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98058 3223059303/L07S0079 3223059223/L07S0079 WELLS RUDY L+ALICE R WILKEN STEPHEN & VIRGINIA 17709 116TH AVE SE 17827 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 6196600360IL07SO079 TORBENSON W D PO BOX 59984 RENTON WA 99058 6196600040/L07S0079 VERMA NARINDF,R KUMAR 48317 AVALON HEIGHTS TER FREMONT CA 94539 6196600340/L07S0079 VERMA SUNIL KUMAR 48317 AVALON HEIGHTS TER FREMONT CA 94539 6196600160/L07S0079 WEISBERG NANCY M+TAMARA B 17914 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600201/1-07S0079 WILLIAMS CLARK A 17861 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 L19 Icing County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 Notice of Land Use Decision (Type 2) File No.: L07SO079 Department Decision: Approve with conditions SEPA Threshold Determination: NIA Applicant. Max Lissak 111211 NE 53rd Street Kirkland WA 98033 Date of Recommended Decision and Determination: February 19, 2009 Project Location: 17802 - 116th Avenue SE, Renton Project Description: Subdivision of a .79-acre parcel into 6 residential single family together with construction of a private road and driveway.. Permit Requested: Short Plat County Permit Contact Fereshteh Dehkordi (206) 296-7173 fereshte.dhkordi a kin count . ov Zoning. R-6 Drainage Basin: Soos Creek Section/Township/Range: NW 33-23-05 Comment and Appeal Procedure: Comments on this proposal are welcome. You also have the right to appeal this decision and/or determination in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. In order to appeal, a party must file: 1. A notice of appeal and a $250.00 non-refundable filing fee (payable to the King County Office of Finance) must be received in our office by ,. The notice of appeal must include the decision and/or determination being appealed. 2. A statement of appeal must be received in our offices by , which includes: A. The errors contained in that decision and/or determination; B. Specific reasons why the decision and/or determination should be reversed or modified. C. The harm suffered or anticipated by the party; and D. The relief sought. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: DDES — Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The Hearing Examiner does not have the authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified date, in which event delivery prior to 4:30 p.m. on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. Date of Mailing: If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Project Manager at the phone number or e-mail listed above. NOTE: To request this information in an alternative format for people with disabilities, call 206-296-6600 or TTY Relay: 711. King County has made a decision on an application for a development proposal on property at the address listed above. You are receiving notice of this decision because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. S:TUSMCURRENT PLANNINGISupport Stanudi1Short P1atsTrocessing Short Plats\Short Plat NODT07SO079 NOD.doc V C Q s Icing County Department of Development and t=rwlronmentat Services goo oakesdate Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 48057-52.�2 206-296-6"0 I- Y 206-296-7217 Appi Web dale: 011114NO07 LAND USE PERM11 A,PPLICATiON FOR16f For altemate formats, call 206-296-6600. r lMse Only » on riot write7 7 .. ❑ DEC 112007 ._.. �~ y �_S- Date Received (stamp) I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): i—i Binding site plan. ❑ l'1 .�iiC ayAnwy do i:iility exGc{3tir}n ❑ Boundary line adjustment ❑ Reasonable use exception ❑ Building permit ❑ Reuse of public schools ❑ Conditional use permit ❑ Right -of -Way use permit ❑ Cfrlcal areas alteration exception ❑ Road variance ❑ Linear ❑ Nonlinear ❑ Shoreline conditional use pwrnit ❑ Drainage variance Or adjusts-mnt ❑ Shoreline exemption ❑ Period review for mining sites ❑ Shoreline redesignation Mat alteration ❑ Shoreline substarOal development © Plat vacation permit ❑ P-suffix amendment ❑ Shoreline variance Sita development perm.!* ❑ Site -specific comprehensivsplan amendment ❑ Special district overlay removal ❑ Special use permit ❑ Subdivision — Formal Subdivision — Short ❑ Temporary use permit ❑ Urban planned developme,it ❑ Zone redassification ❑ Zoning variance being duly swom, state that I am the owner or of5mr ofthe corpo rpn owning property describV$ in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and tW all statements, answers and information submitted With this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of " knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it tray be necessary for DDES staff to mn a ne or more site visits- Ey signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it i at property, the owner hereby agrees to notify terrants of possible site visits. Printed Name yL.fs_ Signature C4rnpanY 4i_0�-_ Phone -2(f7+�- �. 7 E-maiVsc�% Mailing Address srrt r JF0 MY of If applicable, state below the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the CertificaWn and Transfer of Application Status form fined with this.appl'rcaWn- Name Phone - Mailing Address AppForL2ndtlsePerm4s50RM.d0t E-mail 1c-app- L1p par aanaM07 zip DPage i of 2 JAN ? 1 cuu8 K.C. D.D.E.S. Send.the posting package forth notice board for this application to: the ownertapplicant [] the consuitantlagent (engineer, architect, etc-) Send letters, including those requesting additional information for this application, to: [D the owner/applicant Q the consultantlageni Note: Application forrns For Forma! Subdivisions NAME OF SUBaNIS �I&Tr= RED LANE) ADDRE$S CITY subrn ttai requirements are subject to revision without notice - ENGINEER (COMPANY) 7 7,0.2 ,7 p rev pL STREETADDRESS CRY STATE zip DEVELOPER (COMPANY) ^- — STRE 7 ADDRESS - 1-1114'r NAME (INWDUAL) ,206 Te7,EpmoNE E-MAIL NAME (INpNIDUAL) CITY -- STATE SIP if -MAIL Land Surveyor's Certfflcation I hereby certiry that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and .regulations of the plaiting resolution and Stan 'or King L o nty, Washington. f Check out the ,pDES Web sine at w,w_w.kIngccorri1f _q+nwlp2rmits AppForLandUsaPannl $FORM.doc Ic-app-luper.pdf 0&14/2047 Pale 2 of?. it Web date: 0811412007 LAND USE PERMIT L41 K,�,94,rity APPLICATION FORM Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-296-6600 M 206-296-7217 Staff Use Only - Do not write in this lox Application o7 S o o 7 DEC 11 Z007 �J K." 0.1).E-S' Date Received (stamp) DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS DIVIDER T I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): ❑ Binding site plan ❑ Public agency & utility exception ❑ Site development permit ❑ Boundary line adjustment ❑ Reasonable use exception ❑ Site -specific comprehensive plan ❑ Building permit ❑ Reuse of public schools amendment ❑ Conditional use permit ❑ Right -of -Way use permit ❑ Special district overlay removal ❑ Critical areas alteration exception ❑ Road variance ❑ Special use permit ❑ Linear ❑ Non -linear ❑ Shoreline conditional use permit ❑ Subdivision - Formal ❑ Drainage variance or adjustment ❑ Shoreline exemption P Subdivision - Short ❑ Period review for mining sites ❑ Shoreline redesignation ❑ Temporary use permit ❑ Plat alteration ❑ Shoreline substantial development ❑ Urban planned development ❑ Flat vacation permit ❑ Zone reclassification ❑ P-suffix amendment ❑ Shoreline variance ❑ Zoning variance I, �f�.� r being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that ail statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for ODES staff to make one or more site visits. By signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it is rental property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. Printed Name <4 / Signature Company L G c_ Phone '2v& - "7-e - 6 G "Z E-mail en / p Mailing Address // 7'/ fir/, r o3r STREET CITY ST ZIP If applicable, state below the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application. Name Phone - - E-mail Mailing Address STREET CITY ST Zip AppForLandUsePerrnits€ORM.doc le-app-luper.pdf 081 E4I2007 Page 1 of 2 WN FILE COPY Send the posting package for the notice board for this application to: the ownerlapplicant ❑ the consultantlagent (engineer, architect, etc.) Send letters, including those requesting additional information for this application, to: ❑ the owner/applicant �3 the consultantlagent Note: Application forms and submittal requirements are subject to revision without notice. For Formal Subdivisions only: NAME OF SUBDIVISION `1 �P�. EGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR ( OMPANY) STREtT ADDRESS wk CITY STAIrE Zip ENGINEER (COMPANY) STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE zip DEVELOPER (COMPANY) STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE Zip Land Surveyor's Certification I hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and regulations of the platting resolution and stand i�for King Copnty, Washington. SIGNdD DATE NARAE (INDIVIDUAL) .> T!X&E)PHONE NAME (INDIVIDUAL) TELEPHONE E-MAIL NAME (INDIVIDUAL) TELEPHONE E-MAiL Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinncounN.goy/permits AppForLandUsePermitsFORM.doc lc-app-luper.pdf aar14r2007 Page 2 of 2 v I � � -- KC fi , 2007 LNi - r King County Department of Development and Environmental Service: 900 Oakesdaie Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 06/28/2007 CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT STATUS For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: Activity Number: LOI 60719 Permit Name;_ FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, �/� �s �sCK (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on the farm provided by DDES. Signature of Applicant -OR- FOR CORPORATIONSIBUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: Date Signed (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of I-G C a corporation or other business association authorized to do busi ess in the State of Washington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: I further certify that the aovgy named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financialiv ref le for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall rem "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on the form - ed by DDES. Ignature of Applicant's Agent Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, 1 certify under penalty of perjury under the law!Fof t a Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. • . , s' GertApplicant$;i lEdCOP4 lc-cer-apstat.pdf 06)28l2007 �� 1�c. ��`' d i e_ m e ap„�P'"'Ige.c AX T''11.�^ �1� tic �r [ - 0C Cs_Vv �oev' 2-( j wA S)' (yam ,W NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultants) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: e clfa v`- Check out the DDES Web site at www.kingcounty.,,goy Rermits certApplicanlStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstatpdf 06/2812007 Page 2 of 2 TH 44 619660 'o NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DiV XCSP L975ON2 09WQ200)DDQ3 LOT 2 �4 "rk , iT ija 6, mn 4 NO. I Monday, Dec 10, 2007 01:44 PM Windows NT Version'. 5.1 User; t6pletts Computer. DE235375 05: �4 .......... 7 41 NORTHIA a. e�A Lu �Tz LL: Ak �;bfAft 7 77F -V_ - ? va .4 Monday, Dec 10, 2007 01:42 PM User: tfipletts Computer: DE235375 0s: Windows NT Version: 5.1 This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 4243 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision : Applicant's Name: Dennis Aifredson Proposed Use: 6 Single Family Residences Location: Lot: Block: Development: Parcel: 619660 0100 Address: 17662 116TH AVE SE, RENTON Information: WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a I.— Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing Null inch water main, Null feet from the site. And / Other b k Water service will require an improverruit to the water system of: Water service to the proposed plat will require the installation of onsite and offsite water main. The existing 6-inch AC water main may require removal and replacement due to the projects required frontage improvements. Final water layout and requireemtns will be determined based on final site development plans and Fire Marshal requirements. All plans must be approved by King county Fire Marshal and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2. a 4 The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. b i The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. b L. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a [_1 Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 1,000 gpm b ` Water systems is not capable of providing fire flow. Duration: 2 hours Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. ULU 11 2007DD K.� D.D.E,S. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. it is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Dare Mattioda 11/14/20" I Agency Name Signatory Dame Date Development Coordinator 1 TitleFILE COPY� Signa C Date 5uus Creek Water & Sewer District "rptAvailSinglePwcelAddWater" 216796 L07SC)&� � P t v �. a..... -.✓� -.—"I!0.v-tdl �` 3 s �r 351 o�iEZ 6 lco J � f o -e .,�L__ — -- - — �� — _ � o _ II � I � ^�� s oy$ � a H p,w y •` 1a.9-,osl H�. � m��' g � �i o ,Y e _ � . _ . _ — — _ _�—'�'B-�B1T �--—�--C•i-i':Ci I: i,S � "p. �.oD'sal � u r 1 _ � _ � --� V :, � (�,1 IV e ' �•m R � ry `� p '- � � p° .arar R .�`°� ` or �V'd � a � 7� IAtl •�"� � � � �,; �bi� � x` 'Ys I"3g a ,Ig o "a� �1" Kg i I ent alToi ..•r'�'esl° elP .oi Lcl 'L c 3—r°-IrtY�4a zil.re�rl loje m I l l ai O e E Cb ar „es 4s I + 1 � � � � � _ tl � f _ — �_ — ri52rL 0! °iPl I• IIII 1- �� rs�: �i% � % ,I 3 ¢ b � r•-o.-a � uau a g I �? SSG .2 rI I Y o f/f G6 sr m yc7 � R E S I y I � K' I .190 n! ,\ °I°1gs•IvrPamg ti I ,,7 jy I^a I �] j rb .nl o yy r I o 0I3��� m$�rz 1 ry a l\" me - oP^ mLOA 1 9�g V QaP 4 SSS ILI I .r°i G al OL NI NN I Im ��� �! 3 � �- Y _ 1 _le • ' w _ _ — _ _ -„Y"--.7 _ _ "-" F 7L�1 V.k �Y .9 I _ _ _ llroeL _ I is-B laaax 'pe�" ,. 35 '3AV H194b AHVON j�? K �• � � M � I W O v� � n� l'i 0r '3 y I { I h I_ ! roL I alms + .uvYl I .roe I ` !n a •°�r4 Orr +`b IiI r 2s� , 1.b ` "i, 41 �\ y 'f ., O �••.rs ��. Y� mF,, a �, � 9,l u,. � I .a: sl cr f E y ..al, •1° _ 'n .snL i .rw .c[ Ir) _B Y^iti.Qi RyQ 9-aIL — � • _R R — _ — I�w�l r '3Y`.4 _ _ _ _ w- - d�_il'QH S�1317f13 LL�, � � 9£Z-Z£ 3N � N A pr, y This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 5033 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision Applicant's Name: Dennis Alfredson Proposed Use: 6 Single Family Residences Location: Lot: Block: Development: Parcel: 619660 0100 Address: 17662 116TH AVE SE, RENTON Information: ( Attach map & Legal description if necessary ) SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing sewer main Null feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. b ' Other (describe): Sewer service to the proposed plat will require the installation of onfite and offsite sanitary sewer main. Final sewer layout will be determined based on final site development plans, building locations and outlet elevations. All plans must be approved by KCWTD and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2. a V, The sewer system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. b The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary a Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. b Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a d; Connection Charge: Yes b VJ; Easement (s). Onfite and Offsite easements required c W Other: Right of Way and Grading permit. 1 ?001 - Service is subject to the applicants agreement to corapiy and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility oCthc, appi Want io macs; a—iy s --clu:,-ed c..Lensicn oL fw :'itic:7, .o serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOO_S CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 1� c��y Darci Mattioda 11I14/2 [cu] Agency Name 1 Signatory Name Date Development Coordinator� _.. -- -- Title Si)tu,ry Da Soos CreekWater & Sewer Nstrici " rptAvai1SingleParce1A&iSewer" 2,6'96 Lo7Soo /� - rIQ }/ ZIP I .Sl�M1 � ri-[@-,S Y� c .IG•tt „ N .Sy :� �, M'+ + 15 RZ �SYtF. `° { 'rS. 3S jx�% i OP'90i „ 4• c� 1 0 m N `�� A �•tt V' P,�, r ys ��O�p W 9 8 �'i b $�` 1 1 LU i m o 50 m I , t I N�tiL4� ep.31' 4 I f I l P sl I I � I m ,R s`°[ !exr. dz r@z i—'_crveil'7T�-ate d _ 3�6Sq _ ° �Qa VII 'b fll as� I rbr 11 ✓ � + I } I. 8 O �� yr: —T� •x er s $ I a tt S IF I � a akV's'eG a 3 1II Y OS � .di hUi q.y a A h V Al [II .r F ro III a o. 1`s .sai % m9 £ ^' h- C g ❑ � R �.nan � ..cal say .voi ! S-�P P a x 35 '3AV Hlg�4 - R - ear.'g O Na @ fts ♦ p re. � �,, a NA fn aI }- o la �.`°" • ea ozi "LU 6 az @ lPp� I 1 .e � _ v _I I _ � •s�o� I olm� it_wi_ dl,K m _ co 4b ro[ I I ''F 31R o l p 06, o .R Y } � .sn[ o .s•z AN Department of Development and Environmental services Fire District Receipt 900 oakesdale Avenue KingCounty Renton, WA 9B055-1219 Fire District # q 0 Name of Project / Proposal L�NA . SHUO-T� r _. Location of Project / Proposal (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)* *One of these required for processing of application PA-100, tp- (X l q U00 0100 SEC TWN RNG_ Comer KROLL PAGE Name of Applicant A pA eTk prou l r,- VQ, fl-Address of Applicant t � e p6 U Telephone Number (P_S 3-41 e- Description: Type of Project 1 Proposal Check appropriate box(es) Ll Apartment / Multifamily ❑ Commercial / Industrial ❑ Retail ❑ Residential: Single Family Residence ❑ Other (describe) V6torz couplings required on Fire Hydrants U Duplex ❑ Subdivision 314 ort Subdivision / Short Plat ❑ Rezone 03 -5 ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Unconditional Use ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ School / Classroom Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project / proposal. This receipt shall be valid for 30 days from date of signature. P -- Agency Name Title Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Prinked Name (Isignawre Date Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue 1 U Renton, WA 98055-1219 DEC 1 1 7007 Note Applicant: at the time of application Ay ii .t1.D,E. copy Attn: Fire Engineering a to DDES the white copy must be present.,,. with project / proposal submittal. 07 78 (Rev. 111021 \�V1 NW 114, IS 33, T 23 N, R D5 E. W.M., FbSRHG AI+E �0 WAE Mai CS N1 � G£OAR 4� 9DYff�GA'1r 92f. I a. - .: f 2 I-_. _...... . 3 I REC."T.N-1 i '. ------ TRACT ROAD A - - - F"VATE ACCEsS TRACT RECIrgm,'Accf-% r--- --- - -- - - - r---- I -------� r- -------- ---- 6 I 5 I I 1 1 L--- -- - L------------- - I� il-' DEC , I L i 1 2007 L_.. K.c. n.D.F.s. La-7soo79 -R1 on Ur 7- Q PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE: 0.97 N�MHER OF LOTS PROPOSED. E EXISTING ZONE: R-6 PROPOSED USE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SEWER DISTRICT: S00S CREEK WATER & SEWER WATER DISTRICT' 5OOS CREEK WATER & SEWER SCHOCL DISTRICT: RENTON #4C3 FIRE D15TRICT: K'NG CC. FIRE PR07ECTICN DIST. 40 TELEP1104E SERVICES- QWEST POWER SOURCE: PUGET 50',;ND :NERDY WATER OUAL17Y TREATMENT �-ANPARD. BASIC FLOW CCNTROL S74NDARD- CONSERVATION BUILDING SE76ACK5 SIDE,5' REAR, 5' FRONT 10' GARAGE: 20' 1.'.CAi. DESCRIPTION LOT 5 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DVISION 1, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 194804CI3798397. J F~ IL Q S a F- L o 0¢ < L Q 7- u a CL a z W SHEET I OF 2 TO: Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC 37702 280th Place Southeast Enumclaw, WA 98022 Attn: Dennis A.lfreson Ref.# Bogoyubov PACJFICNoR77 wes7TrrLL 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 PNWT. -order.-Number: -6-61045-- _ OWNER: Rotstein/Bogolyvbov/Lissak The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • A Full Update of the Short Plat Certificate from September 19, 2007 through November 28, 2007 at 8:00 a.m. has disclosed the following: • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: X • Paragraph 6 of the commitment is/are out, 2007 taxes are paid in full. • There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since September 19, 2007, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of December 4, 2007 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Curtis Goodman Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1327 V DD .TMB t n -, .� DEC 1 1 2007 WAA'FILE COp'y C.C. D.D.E.S, t,67S66-79 (��' PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Title Officer, Curtis Goodman (curtisgoodman@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Rob Chelton(robchelton@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Charlie Bell (charliebell@pnwt.com) Unit No. 12 FAX No. (206)343-1330 Telephone Number (206)343-1327 Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC Title Order No. 661045 37702 280`" Place Southeast CERTIFICATE FOR Enumclaw, Washington 98022 FILING PROPOSED PLAT Attention: Dennis Alfreson Your Ref.: Bogoyubov SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A GENTLEMEN: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. IS VESTED IN: EDWARD ROTSTEIN, KONSTANTIN BOGOLYVBOV, MAXSIM LISSAK, each as their respective separate estate SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: $250.00 TAX: $ 22.25 TOTAL CHARGE: $272.25 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: September 19, 2007 at 8.00 a.m. FIC NORTHWEST TLE COMPANY OF INGTON INC_ Curtis Goodman Title Officer Unit No. 12 Order No. 661045 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: Tract 5, Block 1, Northwestern Carden Tracts, Division No_ 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, page 47, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Schedule B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: Order No. 661045 I. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water_ 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. B. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. Order No. 661045 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1_ EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Owners of premises located easterly of said property PURPOSE: Ingress and egress AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises RECORDED: April 2, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5564282 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PURPOSE: Electric line AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises RECORDED: September 4, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5633012 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PURPOSE: Electric transmission and or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: West 10 feet and the northwesterly portion of said premises RECORDED: September 27, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8509271029 (continued) Order No. 661045 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 4_ RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT AS FOLLOWS: No lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold, or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on this plat, namely 35,000 square feet,for S-1 Suburban Use, with a minumum lot or tract width of 135 feet. Water to be secured from local improvement district. Sewage disposal to be by use of septic tanks and dispersal fields or approved design. 5. Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roads, as dedicated in the plat. 6. GENERAL, AND SPECIAL TAKES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2007 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 619660-0100-07 LEVY CODE: 4250 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $145,000.00 Improvements: $123,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED $3,053.15 $133.10 $100.43 $10.57 $1.59 $9.96 TOTAL BILLED: $3,308.82 PAID: $1,654.41 TOTAL DUB: $1,654.41 END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Jeff Olsen Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. JHC/20061109002801/20061109002798/20061109002799/20061109002800 Northwestern Garden Tracts Division #1 45/47 _ I &F pMoV1TSKY ROAD o.rl Ac rof. ve.si S E 178TH 6T R ---------------- =-!_❑ ea1-Islas-1 s.s.- -- --- I .1 to sl I 30 50 i~ •� �A�s/' N Sl �, � 115/51 01372 II73i1 7 � 35I111 `'•i�la1 03M �� 9- 1 1 I. fs ?Sf S w e e 17 Z 2 IIaO+ ]I 11 175771 0M i M17) �I� ..f Si r W7, "I? Tfl A$b.o 49.14 ] _7P�ttlti_ISY7, -- ./ a �- j KC SR 87a71B8 Io" � ow 2z3046 B41703 - ^ - - - 0 4. 2220887 LOT 2 _ ` OF LOT.?`y` 16 3 LOT 4fH1 1]N1 rl I17111 SO I I 4 61 Bfio 4 I?e, NORTHWESTERN r�p' GARDEN TRACTS �11. NO. 1 VOI.H-i7 i14711 4I1771 L KCSPL9780042 19990820900003 '{ f L yeti ed � = 4 a1 f 3 6 14 8 Is�sll Ilii71 1i1/11 797131 om �J am 7R,A f - - --11CLLA SM015 RIM RETURN ADDRESS: Max Lissak 11121 NE 43rd St Kirkland, WA 98033 RELEASE OF EASEMENT Reference No. of Related Documents: 5564282 Grantor. William R. Dias, Judy K. Dias Grantee: Lenora Apartment LLC Short Legal_ Tract 5, Black 1, Div.1 Northwestern Garden Tracts Assessor's Tax Parcel: 619660 0100 WHEREAS, an easement was created by document dated April 1, 1963, and recorded in the office of the County of King under recording number 5564282, across a parcel of land legally described as Tract 5, Block 1, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of plats, page 47, in King County, Washington, and; WHEREAS, said easement was for the benefit of the owners and successors in title of Northwestern Garden Tracts Division 1 Lot 2 ("Lot 2"), and; WHEREAS, said casement is of no further need or use by the current owners or successors in title of said Lot 2; NOW THEREEEIRE, William Dias and Judy Dias ("Grantors" as current owners of said Lot 2, do hereby abandon and release all rights acquired under said easement for all intents and purposes, to be effective on the date hereof. Dated at Washington, on the Sr day of /(lotvAY 0' 200_� —* fl signature of William R. Dias, owner of tax parcel 619660-0285 ("Grantor") signature oSludy K. Dias, owner of tax parcel619660-0285 ("Grantor") State of Washington ) County of King ) On this day personally appeared before me iI Ij0M K. Liras to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, on oath stated that (s)he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Dated this 5' day of Afovfw& , 20047 7 `+%'�����itllyr�� may.: NOTARYJOBUC for the State of Washington Residing at Raj Tic-1 NOTAW CA PL"n D r. My Commission Expires: r state of Was County of Yin'�ii� On this day personally appeared before me iot5 to rue known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, on oath stated that (s)he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Dated this 6 day of 200T NOTARY—PUBNOTARY-PUBUC for the State of Washington Residing at dIJ My Commission Expires: 101101200N _ 1 ' DEC I I COW ��IR hljWE,57TT'i°T If�AR10L'N TRAC T.S 4� T� rrN- vo. L YIN IN 7"14F /IL W L - N. W4 SE rz3N, R5E. W/V SCALE i-w 62EMYE7YUce--- Ld/YO.S[1RVNYDR- USE. 5-I IWAZ A7TC _ � --- ti 1 "- —R Maa ��ls`M 61R 74-- I i6 !N-ii- 3Z !F j� 1 {Q RIIIIypR Je aer ar 7 j Ic F •d oL •� far. r� 3°a-!l Jca. wi 13 ,ao n lOSTI -- 7 18 Jrasr A—S9 B If Son 1I Ora.! w—s'- 9 n f a = t • M DEDICATION Jaw u — ! � N KI✓OW AlL MENBY THESE l7RESEN7"S THAT aYF Ti4L u"Ve Rj'1GNe0 2 b � ryiFLIPM W GOROON a/✓a GL.a4Y.i t G04'001� X/.f w FE, o1vvEFS /NFFF J/KYLE dF TXr� LCNR XFREAY PLaTT6O, XEiEEY 04C/�RF nrisvcATDNnnEo/rAr�Tbrw�uJEosTiVFpua/JCFoeEreeelL e Sl.f S r JT.[2EYi ALLEYS aNL) EVPNUL s ..TNO/aW N#P#AN6 jX4 U.s•E . � T.t+#SCOF FtlL dlL pU9L1C NUePQS#f NpT 1NCDNs/'TSIVT N+/T/./ iJ.9e•11S#TJ FOL PVILIIC N GVIi ' IIVL�JFS, P[Ja ALL .I.?fOF Pw�& L44J!/yENTs oft APfEJ9f.0 ~~Are P-AWW'rY aR ,a ea s T+/ETl/v&.•SF10-0V aN Ti rclxsTPDt JJVf PU,eaci.fE fJc4tfwN//r9oKaJ`fp• N n I res.fa � A[SO1/1Pt+PFiIT7bNv.CFILf JfpfY.S sb4C T1 QE Fi6LS i1PpN TjJL' LeTX (SLaCLS T.PdCTJ OR R/FC6L S OFLO�yO f1/DiYp aN � 1 OLJ]- /N JbE L]R/p1ry{rL .PEASONAtlL{ Gv~VJ&A- AiA�r•u# ALLEYS nNii rrac�r • syD.Yry 1JEPFCK. INIV/7ESS�V/%F�EXA✓c1'1RELJHTD JYTOUEYVHDJ ` AO /949. S .� �Wl LLIAU W. GOR-¢01V-._ _- Z sa/-r! i 6LADYE F. GORDON T I : S a . wl "'—'ft ACKNOWLAW6ENENT 7 Q Y -V7W'tOfDY4Sl/IN(1TOIy ti t6.rl C C"O!lNTYFKIA+G - }35 O d Z /7l1J 1J ra 4£.E'17FY171.170N T1J/S-��. QAY OF r,� �� j ! iay. ss AD 1906 BfrdRS AOF, YW-O UNDE,P.T dYr,9 .4 NO7A.PY f-VWZIC - ' P£X,,�SGONAZJ Y APAEAR,r,9 JV/LL/A/Y WGOQDOWAA/O GLAOYSF TD ,", TPMfK/VOINXTOt1E T.VE PERSCws ♦rHd EXE tW - 'TOW, c D. is FO.PEGO/1Y60EOJCdT/L&VdNO W�VO AC.CN4WLEOGE'O fO.YC Ti[+eT t¢Np„{-EALEO TSVE .S4ME AS T,Vfi.P F�PFF ANO 'I. r-/ao rV Sr. ,S• #e OD-E rsao. ea ✓atuvla.pY AFr W. OICD FO.P TiJE USES AND AUIPPoSES r • I F/E'Pfi/V 1WW7IONEO. S;a;ALS7'77LU � �'.Y•}D�iF17 :%f'J.N�.2 W�TNES,f MYIJANpdiV4 DfFI(/AL JfdL THE 0,4Yd/YO VEEP QE5Ge/P)r/" 6A.POEN j nF Tl/E � 3j; REST/?ICTIONS 11'O L OTORPaeriON OFALOT Gf.'7/iJPL4T, SI/e[ f dE 301D ORrPEJOL la OR OAaYE.Pf y1P-V4Nl,-ReA0 O.FCl/d/ 711L'OWNERSI!/P 4FA/yYPOPT/ON Of T11Jl PLdTSIJ.aLL 6 LOTO.P TRACTW OW OF aye PfRNiT EXctrr<r JS A 1 rlfAF, aw-%/V B/NLA+ 4- oNSNO 1YNA ASs/GA:s- f/.2s1 A60✓F 14•.P1rTEN. - -- RE.S/DING AT r-ia— crr. afu - C.FJRLO - NOTARY 3F ME TPUE - PUBLIC " 3siJ Lew '-Crl/:ilGSdA' ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE 1WIArl,fy(EFT/TrTl/ 7 ATPLATGF AVPTMdL'57thW 64PDEN/RAC7r V1V1S7aVlVD/ /1B41lp ON4NAlIU/L J&AVEYLYO J1ffPAf1JOdOF ViLiFp,giy0 -1•EC.33,T.2J+4!PSf t.rCP/'7f/AT TiJEp/lTJlN£ErCOYI+PSF-.f, dMOdN(,LEI -U NNEREBY AFP J1JDMI+MTW"P0N CUPPECTL Y,IV47 lNEMONUNENTJ Il4VF.W�rN �ES.s N .SE T,4N0 JOTAND 81DCt CO.PNERj 3 T/7.CEp CVoeeFrt 77 Y ON Tiff YYE1rPA TUTEJANF 7J/6Rle l'Y/N6 PrI& LA7/6Ns•OYiJ/GNJ OF i11/r11A' 'VE e.'&-v EET T r VVZW.5PERS4L (/CE NSE NO-,Zi3L- RENEW O. L-Ae 1/948) ANY POA?7/ON zveREaoc BYPNYSuc+IF!-YsoN, /TLF AOOVF LANO/-A'U rJ PLANNING CONNISSION L JlfeFBY CC,?77FY TllA T TuF yV1TLl1N PL.9T OF IYORTJlWEJ T.`2 GA4'11 N MACT.S, U/Y- ACT! I,Y flUl. r APPROWL? BY PIE ' "�G CnbIYTY PL,d/J.ViA COAAyIJJ/ON alr Tiff _ Jr nr aF I _�±iAf�CdC —Al1 face i L ' f A/E rnf-r' EXE['fr: n'E 0JF10ErC' D A n Tau_ p.4ro1� w"�e... CLf.PK-BOA n Cnuf1��'rlONN/Ssld W—r CtlJ•Fl14+V. 4pp,9 CCYNTYChNNIl 7s SEAL' EN6INEERT APPROVAL FXAMLNEtl ANpAl19RDVE0 17/IJOAYOF A ADl945. A�7114f4. C011N ry ROA .fN6/NC@,P FILING FORM 3788397 F/L fn i'p.p RECaRU AT RJf REQLaes T of rI[E ICING COUNF7 rGYdNNJA$i'CpMMlffrONoN.rris�_a4rdF apAer—,.,_eol0sp dT_LZ Al/N�fTl:s' /+drr 3 7. M, ArrU kE cn.QpEn /N YOLllAh dT �ls7.7-r FAQ' -41—Rl CDRVJ Di' KING COUNTY.wm4rrllvorellv..� Pe ," c OUN7YAVV lee CO(/NTl' AUOI row MAIN FILE COPS L19 King Courrky Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 06/28/2007 AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. F �' „ r� Ln STATE OF WASHINGTON } i�DI r I',,.��. �'� ti�'' �`-4 SS � �� !_ COUNTY OF KING DEC 4 1 ��07 `),t .E S' File Number: Lo-7soo-79 Application Name: G Project Location: / % v -2— '4v �e s6, The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the affiant`s knowledge the critical areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of critical areas regulations far y property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such v191!Os have been/are being resolved to the satisfaction of King County. Date and Place (City and State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. 1l' CO` ry � � 410\�\1� U1 IIF. C.�YYL�)2 Y) Zl7C � VA CN tyl uy �C1,S r r `/ S%0 Check out the DDES Web site at www.kin coup ov/ erm V - : ~ AfridavitCdticalAreasComplianceFORM.doc Ic-aff sacomp.pdf 06128/2007 �� �y� 2 rof I PRELIMINARY TARGETED TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Lenora 116th Ave SE Short Plat for Lenora Apartments, LLC King County File #A07PM1976 Parcel Number 619660 0100 17800116`h Ave SE Prepared by: z PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN} LLC Dennis Aedson, P.E. 3 7702 280'h PI SE Enumclaw, WA 98022-6828 December 6, 2007 Supplemented Offske Analysis 12-24-07 Revised 12-22-08 PRELIMINARY TARGETED TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Lenora I I e Ave SE Short Plat RF NEfor Lenora Apartments, LLC CEC L ;, 'ZOGB L07 SO07? K.G. IDES- King County File # '' FP A9'< LAND USE SERVICES parcel Number 619660 0100 DIVISION 17800116`h Ave SE Prepared by: PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN} LLC ' Dennis Alfredson, P.E. 37702 28e P1 SE Enumclaw, WA 98022-6828 December 6, 2007 Supplemented Offsite Analysis 12-24-07 Revised 12-22-08 Lenora Short Plat TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: PROJECT OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................5 Project Description & SUMMARY..............................................................................................................5 DesignStandards................................................................................................................................................. S flow chart from 2005 swdm page 1-11......................................................................................................0 ExistingConditions....................................................................................................................................7 CurrentDevelopment....................................................................................................................................... Natural Drainage System Functions.................................................................................................................... 7 Wetlands and other SensitiveAreas..................................................................................................................... 7 Soils...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1977 Aerial Photo................................................................................................................................................ 8 Back of Aerial Photo Showing Date.................................................................................................................... 9 Confirmationof Asphalt Driveway..................................................................................................................... 10 TIRWorksheet ............................................................................................................... Figure1: Vicinity Map .............. ................................................. __........................................... ....................... 13 Figure2: Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................._ 14 SECTION I1; CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY....................................................................... 15 ROADVARIANCE_ ................................................................................................................................. 15 2005 Surface water Design Manual Core Requirements........................................................................17 2005 Surface water Design Manual Special Requirements....................................................................19 SECTION III: OFF SITE ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................20 TASK 1: Define and map study area...................................................................................................-..20 task 2: review all available information....................................................................................................22 Task 3: fieLd inspect the study area.......................................................................---.............................24 task 4: described the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems...................................24 Figure3: Petrovitsky As-built........................................................................................................................... 27 SECTION IV: FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS & DESIGN....................33 PART A: Existing Site Hydrology ........ .....................................................................................................33 PART B: Developed Site Hydrology........................................................................................................33 Calculations of Existing/New Impervious Areas................................................................................................ 33 Existing/New P.G.I.S. Drawing.......................................................................................................................... 37 Existing/New Total Impervious Areas Drawing................................................................................................. 38 parts c & d: performance standards & flow control system.....................................................................39 RunoffControl ....................................................................................................................... ------------------ 39 ProposedFlow Control BMPs........................................................................................................................... 39 SECTION V: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN...................................................................40 On -Site Conveyance................................................................................................................................40 SECTION VI: SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES..........................................................................................41 list of special reports & studies ........................................ .............................................................. .......... 41 SECTIONVII: OTHER PERMITS.......................................................................................................................42 Permitsrequired.....................................................................................................................................42 Permitsnot required................................................................................................................................42 SECTION VHI: ESC ANALYSIS & DESIGN....................................................................................................44 requiredtest measures...........................................................................................................................44 SECTION IX: BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, & DECLARATION OF COVENANT... 45 12/2312MCARai & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsI77R Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 2 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION X: MAINT.ENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL..........................................................................46 APPENDIXA: BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET............................................................................................47 12/23/2MC. Plat & Site Civil ►aes►gniLenom aptslnR Lenora 08-42-22.doc Page 3 of 48 Lenora Short Plat NOTE: This amended report reflects a different approach to this project than was originally submitted. Originally, the areas of impervious and pollution - generating -impervious were assumed "by inspection" to be over the limits of qualification for treatment as a Small Project subject to Appendix C. However, it has come to light that the existing condition held such an area of pollution -generating -impervious ("PGIS") that the proposed area of PGIS would not meet the threshold of requirement for water quality treatment; i.e., the proposed PGIS area did not increase the existing PGIS area by more than 5,000 s.f. The evidence of that consists of: 1) an affidavit from the demolition contractor attesting to the existence of an asphalt driveway; 2) an aerial photo dated 1977 showing that the driveway existed then. This concept has now been taken a step further to assess whether the total area of new impervious can be held to 10,000 s.f. or less, and therefore the project as a whole can quality for treatment under Appendix C. It has been found that this limit can be held with the proviso that a recorded covenant limiting the area of impervious surface for each house -and -sidewalk (not counting driveways) is limited to 2,393 s.f , AND the area of house -sidewalk - driveway is limited to 2,793 s.f. See Section IV for Calculation of Existing/New Impervious Areas The developer accepts this limit on impervious area. Consequently, that is what is now proposed. This report has been rewritten in the format of a Targeted TIR for Preliminary Plat purposes. It has been revised where necessary to address the new direction. 42a3f2008CAPiat d Site CM1 DesignlLenora AptsITIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 4 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION I: PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SUMMARY • 6 single-family lots on 0.97 acres. • Zoned R-6 • 2.5% average slope to the northeast. • Single drainage basin. • Total new impervious is limited to 10,000 s.f., including roofs, driveways, and access roads. Project is therefore subject to Appendix C. Total new pollution generating impervious is 497 s.f. (therefore < 5,000 s.f. threshold for water quality treatment.) Drains to a wide swale that runs northerly across the properties to the north, then northeast to the storm sewer in Petrovitsky. • Location is on the east side of I I e Ave SE, a few hundred feet south of Petrovitsky. The property to be platted consists of a single tax parcel. "Existing condition" is of three houses and associated accesses, now having been demolished under separate permit. • No streams or wetlands exist on site. a Soils are described by the SCS as Alderwood. A soils report has not been prepared. a Water is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. • Sewer is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. See the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. See the Site Plan in Figure 2. Desrgn Standards • Design standards are taken from the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual Appendix C. M212008C_1P/at & Site civil DesignlLenora aptsmR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 5 of 48 Lenora Short Plat FLOW CHART FROM 2005 SWDM PAGE 1-11 1.1.2 DRAINAGE REVIEW TWES AND REQUIRL-MJ.N'I:-. Y F IGURE 1.1.2.A F1 OW CHART FOR DETERMINING TYPE OF DRAINAGE REVIEW REQUIRFU 1 Is the project a single family residerrtial or ag►iculturaf project that results in �2,000 sf of new impervious surface and meets o following criteria? • The project r in 510,000 of total Impervious •' surface added sin 15 9.000 sf of new pervious surface, or for sites zoned as RA, F, or A, new pervious surface 570,000 st or 35% of the site. Yes whichever is greater, OR • The project results in s4% total impervious surface and 515% new pervious surface on a single parcel site zoned as RA or F, or a singlelmultlple parcel site zoned as A, and all impervious area on the site, except 10,000 sf of it. will t)e set back from its natural location of discharge from the site at least 100 ft for every 10,000 sf of total impervious surface? No Does the project result in z2,000 sf of new impervious surface or >3S,000 sf of new pervious surface, OR is the project a redevelopment project on a parcel or combination of parcels in which No new plus replaced impervious surface totals z5,000 sf and whose valuation of proposed improvements (excluding required mitigation and frontage improvements) is >50% of the assessed value of existing improvements? Yes SMALL PROJECT DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.1 Note: The project may niso be subject to Targeted Drainage Review as determined below. Does the project have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories of projects (see the more detailed threshold language on p• 1-14)? 1. Projects containing or adjacent to a flood, erosion, or steep slope hazard area; projects within a Critical Drainage Area or Landslide Hazard Drainage Area; or projects that propose x7,000 sf (3 ac if the project is in Small Project Drainage Review) of land disturbing activity. 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12- or larger or receives runoff from a 12" ­xLarger drainage pipeldltch. 3. Redevelopment projects proposing >3100,006 in`�i Improvements to an existing high use site. Reassess whether drainage review is required per Section 1.1.1 (p. 1-9)_ Is the project an Urban Planned Development (UPD), 6R does it result in ?50 acres of new impervious surface withnh a subbasin or multiple sugba m that are hydraulically connected. OR does it have a project site 2W acres within a critical aquHar recharge area? Yes No C j Yes `- TARGETED DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.2 FULL DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.3 LARGE PROJECT DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.12.4 2005 Surtacce Water Design Manual 1/2412005 l-ll 12/2 MNC:1Pfat B silie Civil Desigraenore ApfslnR Lenora o8-12-22.doc Page 6 of 46 Lenora Short Plat EXISTING CONDITIONS Current Development The parcel was formerly the site of three single-family homes, which have been demolished under separate permit_ An affidavit has been provided from the demolition contract stating that the dhvewayslaccesses were of asphalt. The site is now cleared, with weeds. Natural Drainage System Functions One distinct "Threshold Drainage Area" exists. No channels are apparent on -site. The flow lines off the parcel are uniformly perpendicular to the northeast. To the east of this property is a lot with a single-family house, then another lot with house, then 118t' Ave SE. The ground to the east falls away. There is no area tributary to this parcel. Wetlands and other Sensitive Areas No Sensitive Areas have been found on site. Sails The Soil Conservation Service map shows soil type classified as Alderwood AgB, a till soil. 72/ =008C:V�iat & Site Civic DesignV-enora Apts1T1R Lenora 08-12-22.doc page 7 of 48 Lenora Short Plat 1977Ae,tial Photo IM T .."r.. . . _ • '' f�,_ . � .rye y. � - ML :n .. L } tJ4 , MOW i � Syr* E� '•� a. .. � _ � - 1 .T Sp:: + �s 12/23WOSCIPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora Apts1TIR Lenora 08-12-22-doc Page 8 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Back ofAc al Photo Showing Date tap: 2I N In CY E d r N IZ23 OWC:VVet d site Civil DesignlLenom AptslTtl7 Lenora 00-12-22.doc Page 9 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Confnination ofAsphaltDriveway ISUISFReeW4ss1WabJ* f Pbm.435-VI-5417 M",4A MM Fax:0,617-R999 Fseii: ILr$!enlretnlLusteet �h17f.�1�RWfLlYl11!&L!!! November 24, 2008 Dennis Aifivdsan Plat-n-She Civil Design IIC Fax: 206-260.8947 1tE_ Demic for Damara I .M—l7802116th Ave SE in Renton Washington To whom it May Concern, For your iaformakion, we completed the demolition work at 178021 l6da Ave SE in Renton Washington, We removed t coke asphalt brom the roadway, the roadway was approxmately 20' wide at the en asxe to the property and wider in other areas. The mad was shsped lilm a hammer head. If you leave any fiu'ther quesOons, please give me a can. Sincerely, 4-7 Mee rerry Brke Excavating dt UndmVotmd Utilities LLC 206-349-4778 12123/2MOC:1Plat & Sete Civil DeslgnlLenora Apts177R Lenora M12-22.doc Page 10 of 48 TIR WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project owner: Lenora Apartments Address 11121 NE 43rd Kirkland 98033 Phone 206 22M602 Project Engineer: Dennis Alfredson P. E. Company Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC Address 37702 2800' PI SE Enumclaw 98022-6828 Phone: (253) 334-69W PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION SUBDIVISION X SHORT SUBDIVISION GRADING COMMERCIAL OTHER Lenora Short Plat PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name: Lenora 116m Ave SE Preliminary Short Plat Township 23N Range 5E Section 33 Project Size: 0.97 acres Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 Acres PART 4 OTHER PERMITS DORlG HPA SHORELINE MNGT COE 404 ROCKERY DOE DAM SAFETY STRUCTURAL VAULTS FEMA FLOODPLAIN OTHER COE WETLANDS HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN COMMUNITY: Soos Creek DRAINAGE BASIN: Soos Creek PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS RIVER FLOODPLAIN STREAM WETLANDS CRITICAL STREAM REACH SEEPS/SPRINGS DEPRESSIONSlSWALES HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE LAKE I GROUNDWATER RECHARGE STEEP SLOPES JOTHER LAKESIDE/EROSION HAZARD PART 7 SOILS SOIL TYPE SLOPES EROSION POTENTIAL EROSIVE VELOCITIES Alderwood 2.5% Slight to Moderate ADDITIONAL SHEETS ATTACHED SEE FIGURE 4 12/2&=8CAP1at & Site Civil DesignULenora Apts1TIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 11 of 48 Lenora Short Plat TIR WORKSHEET PARTS DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS Page 2 of 2 REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT None [ ] Additional Sheets Attached PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Gradinp Restrictions X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities X I Cover Practices I Flag Limits of NGPES X Construction Sequence Other Other Grass Lined Channel Tank Infiltration Method of Analysis KCRTS X Pi e S stem Vault Depression Open Channel Energy Dissipator Flow Dispersal Dry Pond Wetland Waiver Wet Pond I t Stream Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Collect runoff in storm sewer system. Convey to detention pond, then large sand filter. Roof dcrwnsp2uts to be connected to the conveyance system. Facility Related Site Limitations [ ] Additional Sheets Attached Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYN5 F'AK ii iz tAJt_Ml=N i 51l KAL; l 5 (Mav renuire snecial structural review) Cast in Place Vault Retaining Wall Rockery > 4' High Structural on Steep Slo Other Stream buffer Easement, across lots adjoining stream Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract, stormwater ponds Stream tract PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual sftgl condpons as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the infony(Ation grovided here is accurate. 1Z23WWC:VNat & Site civil DeslgniLenors Aptsl77R Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 12 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Figure l Vicinity Map n Se L681n 5t " Se 168M k • Vk i @a, � X' y56 Se 1591hx O xs7aMx3 f7 Se Oft st x Se st t VIe� se 171st to Se Ills! pi 5 112 d R sell!>sc5w Se 112M 4V Se 172nd U x Se 112nd i[ Se 1131d sr r Se 115th St SC Se Cart Rd .. Se 17wh St Se pOMAsky Ad " a g s S R Oman Wit Se ] l8dr PI ]e f 7sdi Ps —_ St k �e Se IBM Sy 181i1 St 181sr st 4 5, mw St •^ a' 5e 182nd k 5e 1B3td 'ASe LOW St ,SCE Se I87rd w �` g -. SC SbVM SC ^ Se IMM to is 184d1 PI Se 186M x htrm wd Se 185Ui Pi Se lanr Hrk $ zftu L86M PI s4 SC Se 18&h N °i se I"Th St s .� Se 189rh 5[ SC 189eB t[ r$ ,t iyt4i Se t5�h w 7y,. ♦� 12/23/ MCAPIat & Site Civil DesignlLenom AptsITIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 13 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Ftgure 2.• Site Plata 1=31"MC:lMat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 14 of 48 Lenora Short Flat SECTION II: CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY ROAD VARIANCE Ktrt�A.owrry Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-2W6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www, kingcounty.gov May 12, 2008 Jennifer Toth Henning, AICP Planning Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Rand Variance Recommendation to the City of Renton Lenora Short Subdivision (Files L07SO079 and L08VO016) Dear Ms_ Henning-. King County is currently reviewing the Lenora preliminary short plat application pursuant to terms of the interiocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County. The project site is located in an area recently annexed by the City of Renton. During our review of the subdivision, the applicant submitted the enclosed road variance application regarding intersection spacing along 116'h Ave SE. To continue our review of the preliminary short plat, a decision by the City of Renton is required for the road variance application. The following summary provides a description of the site issues and a recommendation for the road variance. Findings: 1. The proposed short plat is located on the east side of 116'h Ave SE which is classified by King County as an urban minor artcnat street. As outlined in the 2007 King County Road Standards, this arterial classification requires 500 feet of spacing between intersections. 2. Road access for the subdivision is proposed as a private tract serving 6 lots. The new private road entrance is located on the east side of l l6 h Ave SE and is approximately 197 feet north of the existing intersection at 178`h Place SE. Driveway access to the lots will be restricted to Road A without having direct driveway access to the arterial street. The private toad entrance will be designed with a driveway cut along the curb rather than using curb radius. This type of entrance design will better define the roadway entry as private and reduce the number of public road intersections along 116`h Ave SE. 3_ The Lenora short plat has adequate vehicular sight distance along 1I6`h Ave SE and the road frontage for the short plat will be improved to the urban arterial standards. 4. Evaluation of the site access has not identified any specific traffic hazards and the new road entrance is not expected to create problems with vehicular turning movements. m2W008C.0 lat $ Site Civil DesfgnlLenora AptslTW Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 15 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Jennifer Toth Henning May 12, 2008 Page 2 Recommendation: King County recommends approval of the variance application for reduced intersection spacing. The proposed road entrance provides 197 feet of spacing from the nearest intersection at 1781h Place SE. Traffic safety issues have not been identified during our review of the short plat. The enclosed variance application includes a site plan and parcel mapping prepared by the applicant. The applicant did not provide a specific traffic analysis or evaluation of site access for the project. If the City of Renton determines the road designs are consistent with Renton regulations and/or design policies, the County recommends approval of the road variance. If you have questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 246- 7178 or via email at hm.sande in coup ov. mcc es H. 5anders, Development Engineer Enclosure: Road Variance File L08V0016 cc: Peter Dye Fereshteh Dehkordi 42/234"SC:1Piat $ Site Civil DesfgnlLenore Rpts177R Lenora 08-12-22.cloc Page 16 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision -----Original message ----- From.; Kayren Kittrick[mailto:Kkitcrick*ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:42 PM To: Sanders, Jim Subject: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision Dear Mr. Sanders: Regarding Lenora Short Subdivision (L07SO079 and L08V0016) The City of Renton agrees with the recommendations from staff and approves the variance as written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. - $4ncerely, Kayren K. Kittrick Development Eng. Supervisor Permits k Inspections Development Services Division (425) 430-7299 2005 SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL CORE REQUIREMENTS 1. Discharge at the Natural Location (1.2.1): Stormwater currently runs off along the northeast side. To the east lie lots. The fronting street lies on the west. Consequently, in order to meet this requirement, the street will not have catch basins, but rather will disperse runoff directly over the surface. Roof runoff is to be directed to splash blocks. 2. Offsite Analysis (1.2.2): See SECTION III. 4. Conveyance System (1.2.4): See SECTION V. 12I23a008CAPIat & Site Civil DesigntLenora AptsITIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 17 of 48 Lenora Short Plat 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control (1.2.5): See SECTION VIII. 6. Maintenance and Operation (1.2.6): See SECTION X. 7. Financial Guarantees and Liability (1.2.7): See SECTION IX. lv23aMc.tRat $ Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsITIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc page 18 of 48 Lenora Short Plat 2005 SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Source Control (1.3.4): The Project does not require a commercial building permit or commercial site development permit. IZ73*MCARet B Site Civil DesignlLenora AplsmR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 19 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION III: OFF SITE ANALYSIS SUMMARY NOTE: The nearby 18-lot plat of Woodberry (originally known as Petro Vista, on the corner of 118t�' Awe SE & Petrovitsky), which was recorded in March of this year, drains to this same downstream course, and has a considerably larger potential impact than this subject short plat. The owners of the subject short plat, Lenora Apartments, LLC offer to examine and potentially proportionally share in any mitigation costs that were defined and have been agreed upon by the developers of Woodberry as a result of specific problems that are identified in its downstream analysis, if any. TASK 1: DEFINE AND MAP STUDY AREA CuLg Goutty � . . tiaso�.a _ _ ,: ��4` l ♦It �i"-' "_.'t.'.+ .� i � _ o1' a /.Y kV d. pEYgOvrf lGb ffl I ,��£ililJ�f,AC7E=G PLAINT - 1 « I = _ maa 'a 4 downstream path showing contours rl Pv"atpI 5-01 pe ti�.I Parcellr.ar6vlahels Lt . I Parxl add ess Irbe s _ I Urb n Cxonrh Area Lr I Pp�naal Annexah7n Area I '';e�tltrds {1496 S�r�ey; 11 I IX rear Fio�, L.J Roo"ys LIIJ eh-r`l�ab- Hazard AlO Largs and Large R;4as C 5trea+ls I Km Cour[y Dr -age e� Ki g Caurh''Wer I_J Re ce lmr tl y Area +fj Street, Zp codes iO YCXWated Area Yxn w.led Area sa6els + I Sd O Lit F a w "ftft I Shaded ReW `. i1p�Msf I : Cwta 5cmft light) 12/23/2008C:Plat B Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 20 of 48 Lenora Short Plat ti ! R-12 R 6 R'12 R-18 E n R-6 R-6 R-4 N. kl¢e 1 p 8IL i r '11�71 7 IA+. R-6 R-8 a R-6 downstream path showing imagery 1212312008CAPlat 8 Site Civii DesignlLenora AptslTlR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 21 of 48 Lenora Short Plat downstream for one mile. TASK 2: REVIEW ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION • Adopted basin plan from DDES: A basin plan has been adopted for the Soos Creek Basin, and is included in the Level 1 Downstream Analysis that was prepared for Petro Vista (separate document). • Drainage studies from DNRP Water and Land Resources Division: Numerous drainage studies have been prepared since 1972. Several summaries were examined on the internet. Refer to DNRP to ascertain whether there were any findings relevant to this short plat. • Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports from DDES: KCR 1735 is available but was not examined. • Critical Drainage Area Maps: This parcel is not within a Critical Drainage Area. • FEMA maps: The Districts Report indicates that a 100-year floodplain has not been mapped on this parcel. Further, the MA layer Toodplains" does not indicate floodplains exist on this parcel. Floodplains do exist downstream in the Soos Creek basin. • Other offsite analysis reports: An offsite analysis for Petro Vista was prepared, and is attached as a separate document.. • Sensitive Areas Folio: The Sensitive Areas Folio shows no sensitive areas on this site. 12123/2008C:1Fiat & Site Civil DesignlLenora Apfs4Tll? Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 22 of 48 Lenora Short Plat • Drainage Complaints to DNRP_ According to the iMAP layer "drainage complaints" one drainage complaint has been registered along the downstream route approximately 2,200 feet downstream. This complaint is in regards to flooding of Soos Creek_ It is not reproduced here. According to findings in the Petro Vista Level 7 document, one complaint was registered of water overtopping Petrovitsky that was found to be caused by a plugged culvert. • Road Drainage Problems from KCDOT Roads Maintenance: Not examined. • USDA Soils Survey: Soil type is cited in the Project Summary • Wetlands Inventory: No wetlands are mapped on this site or downstream from this site until it reaches the Soos Creek basin. See map below. • Migrating Rivers studies from DDES: Not examined. F- .:. lnlemet Eapkaeer r'im4p nd­ Wm et f.nkrrer . hnp .--,:. mnrc+,.Ul. OLP-.ier,et.Mm?magsel=any kg King Cowty TeaN+.i�ar IF Mh 01I -' sro m wsl R,r T Lama %yLkir u � aa� A Mayen Lepafrd _ � - Mp/itp1lig R SJ Swn q� ,r Prop& LNM Y i.aTl� � xe' wtrvrra�v wa ',.7 x nnEp raal6 A �=rx'Mhess aah, LTAM -�`', r Ur raa rer r�ooggmr �f/ � � _ � r _•�mrxi ffQaom ��� L 6 '•dlbCrYN4 ± , bL5 afd �sGL RwE9 `.� r cr,c courh as+aR rip C.-t, w.a . r kesaam lmrelrar � ' r Svees 4 � r I�rPaa4d Yce Y ta�a�e kca 4 aan urn^. �,j 116BS Es4Ra1 �fad� r -, fiLgClon P44 t Y .....Rehesh MSP. V � .' !uveieef'edr r�ssse �=«arxe _ Parcelfound searchagtavl Parcels is n— &w Acdre Layer cwr.af w°. Ga PER oca, -�-5electad�lfcienl hlap Sc: ��� -d _.: _3a:.. iMAP showing the Soos Creek basin as a wetland and flood plain W k4vn I Notbtttd mcdc Off "100% - fj 4eamee I Nan . Mode Ofr :306k 1212312008CAPlat 8 Site Civil Aesign4Lenora AptslTlR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 23 of 48 Lenora Short Plat TASK 3: FIELD INSPECT THE STUDY AREA The downstream inspection was performed on November 26 and again on December 22, this time during a moderately heavy rainfall. TASK 4: DESCRIBED THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, AND ITS EXISTING AND PREDICTED PROBLEMS Runoff from the site was not apparent to the naked eye on the day of inspection despite the moderate rainfall. 1 _ "DEPRESSION": The drainage path runs off the site in unconcentrated sheet flow at the northeast comer. The "parcel to the east" has a berm pushed up close to its west property line. It might be speculated that the berm's purpose is to impede the flow of runoff across its lawn from the plat -parcel. Runoff is in fact directed to the northeast comer of the plat -parcel by the natural contours. This berm would serve to further concentrate runoff at the northeast corner of the plat -parcel; i.e, the northwest comer of the "parcel to the east". The berm does not act as a dam, as there is ample room for runoff to escape at the north end. Once clear of the berm, the grade contours show slope to a depression on the lawn of the parcel to the north of the "parcel to the east". Again, there was no runoff apparent on this rainy day. There is no evidence that standing water has been a problem. 2. "SWALE": The grade contours indicated slope leaving the depression and flowing northerly through a broad swath of blackberries and deciduous trees that extend along the back property lines of the three lots to the north. There is no defined drainage course and no standing water. ASIDE: This route is apparent only when actually visited on -site. The NAP contours are ambiguous here, and indicate that the route might be directly east to 118t' Ave SE along the north property line of the "parcel to the east". But on -site it is clear that this is not the case. There is also no defined drainage course along the north property line of the "parcel to the east". ASIDE: There is a well defined drainage course on the south side of the "parcel to he east" that does run directly east, across 118t' Ave SE, and east again to connect to a Soos Creek tributary approximately in the BPA right-of-way. This drainage course existed before the streets were installed and the lots regraded, and still carries water. However, the contours of the plat -parcel indicate that its runoff does not flow to this drainage course. 3. "SWALE": When the downstream contours reach the south property lines of the lots fronting Petrovitsky, a concrete block wall is encountered. The grade drop is fairly dramatic immediately 1262312MCAPrat & Site Civil DesignV_enora AptsUIR Lenora 08-12 22.doc Page 24 of 48 Lenora Short Plat before reaching this block wall. Runoff would in theory be deflected by this wall until overtopping in a shallow swale formed by the earth. Again, there was no runoff apparent on this day. There is no evidence that runoff has ever overtopped this wall. 4. "SHEET". The grade contours then continue northeast down a driveway to Petrovitsky. 5. "GUTTER": Runoff flows in the street gutter and underlying storm sewer in Petrovitsky. That street is sloped down to the east for 640 feet until it reaches the bottom of a valley roughly 350 feet across. The storm sewer then outfalis to Soos Creek. Note: On the day of inspection, the grate of the catch basin at the bottom of the valley was beginning to clog with debris. It is easy to see that this would be a continual maintenance issue. 6. "STREAM': The upper reaches of Soos Creek lie in this valley as does a BPA right-of-way. Consequently the valley is undeveloped and will remain so. The stream flows south then east, across four large single-family home sites that maintain the stream in wooded buffers, then enters Soos Creek Park. The stream path through the park is heavily buffered by woods. The stream then leaves the park and crosses two more large, heavily wooded private lots. Soos Creek has been the subject of intensive and expensive study over the years, and I would not profess to offer any new insight as to its condition or capacity. The analysis ends still in Soos Creek at one mile. 12/29/2MC:1F1at d Site Civil DeslgnUAnora AptsUIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 25 of 48 OFF -SITE ANALYSIS IiR.AiIVAGE SYi3TE1Vl TAiii.lj St]RF.4CF. WATER i osm-N 1%4ANu,%x,, C4IZE RF.QuyRF.MF.'K-r 02 Basin: - �.-ten: C_✓�r'�-..,,,--_ Subbasin Nam¢: -- C.- -- Suk�basin Number: C" Symhol Drainage component Type, Names and Size Drainage Componant [?esorl tlon Slope Distance from site tllscF:ar a Existing Potential Prohlems Rrobinma Obsarvatlone of flaltl Inspector, resource reviewer or resident aae mBR ype: a Bb[ OW. 6Wale. otroerr.. M1Hn nHI, pipe, ppn0; Size: diHmeter, 6l1riHC0 arP4 dralnape baH n, va -talon, cov r, depth, type of aanaltiva area, vo4uma 'K •l� m - 1,320 OOna1rIOHOnH. under CHpa43iy, pen np, Ytoppira, flpOdinp, hgblSpt or orp Hnfam de6lrUGilOn, 6G4UrInO bank alosq M1lnp, edlmanSa,lnn InOkeion other wraalon Sr butary HYaa, I 6 fR0 O prb Iem, ov HNl— pathwsya, po—Hel l�}'SpggtA r / -� .v .S' �C.. �-r /-•c rf' fie-,-v �:� /. � �/ .3 .3. s•4_.• ram- . •..� r'--mortis r--_ � .�� �, .. t c G �'r-�'@'sl Srf«• t% Cr::Nf[ }LU -n /e•..r_�-�.r' Y!� Lenora Short Plat F,!;?ure 3.• Pctrm*sAyAs-budt 'wrz 27' AS, 21 5"d ? 6' -W 172 75 OV 0, A— 2 3 N, R. 5EWM - ---------- R J, .1c%, :Iz �5srs5:" E.-Y 3.9,50� ' . T 576D-153 /I 17 7,a53 C11 n7 J.�A 4 % % en ROADMAY EXC4VATION —I—E.-1- 4-spav —cul y� 1Wf?!� WAY &XCAVAYYON AMANKMENr /77 CU. V2EMBANKMENT .9V s2 12(23/2008C:WVat & Site Civil DesigniLenora Aptsl'nR Lenora 08-12-22-doc Page 27 of 48 fir kN " I _ R. y rm'14 ? "mow .�� -`, ,-��.�•.,. st• � , 41s, L _'} 17 S� T � i ♦� ' y S. - 2 it w �'_.Y' lY� I.' a I,� $.ia Lenora Short Plat S. The stream that crosses Petrovitsky (Soos Creek), to which runoff from the street is directed. BPA towers in the background. 12/2312008C:lPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora ApWTIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 32 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION IV: FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS & DESIGN PART A. EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY The site is largely cleared, with weeds. Slopes are 2.5%. Soils are a till type. Drainage is southwest -to -northeast, into an offsite depression, then a swale flowing northerly across the parcels to the north. There is no area tributary to the site. PART B: DEVELOPED SITE HYDROLOGY The developed site will consist of six houses and associated access. In accordance with the provisions of Appendix C, a detention pond is not proposed. Calculations ofExrsting/New Impervious Areas Lenora Short Plat Area Measurements and Calculations EXISTING PROPOSED PGIS 6,311 SF NON-PGIS 4,855 SF TOTAL 11,166 SF PGIS 6,808 SF, including driveways NON-PGIS CALC total existing (from above) 11,166 SF minus proposed pgis -6,808 SF left over existing 4,358 SF proposed addition 10,000 SF TOTAL PROPOSED NON-PGIS 14,358 SF RESTATED: available area per house 2,393 SF, not including driveways or 2,793 SF, including driveways EXISTING P.G.I.S. 6,311 SF PROPOSED P.G.I.S. 6,808 SF DIFFERENCE - NEW 497 SF 42/23/2008C:IPlat & Site civil DesignlLenora Apts1T1R Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 33 of 48 Lenora Short Plat 497 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS TOTAL 1i,166 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS TOTAL 21,166 TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS 10,000 <5000 S.F., NO WATER QUALITY TREATMENT REQUIRED SF SF (proposed PGIS + proposed non-PGIS) SF SMALL PROJECT SUBJECT TO APPENDIX C BMP REDUCED IMPERVIOUS AREA MITIGATION CALCS. LOT Lot size Percent required to be mitigated "= area req'd mitigatedicredited Zoning Max. allowable % impervious Max. allowable area impery by zoning Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use Actual area of impervious Area to be credited under C.2.9 actual area - allowable = No additional mitigation required. dispersal through vegetation required. LOT 2 Lot size Percent required to be mitigated "= area req'd mitigated/credited Zoning Max_ allowable % impervious Max. allowable area impery by zoning Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use Actual area of impervious Area to be credited under C.2.9 actual area - allowable = No additional mitigation required. 4,939 sf 10 % of lot area 494 sf R-6 70 %, KCC 21 A.12, 030 3,457 sf 3,457 sf allowable (C.2.9.2.1) 2,393 sf 1,064 sf 1,064 sf > 5,075 sf 10 % of lot area 508 sf R-6 70 %, KCC 21A.12.030 3,553 sf 3,553 sf allowable (C.2.9.2.1) 2,393 sf 1,160 sf 1,160 sf> 494 sf OKAY 508 sf OKAY 12l2=W8C.VVat & Site Civil DesignU enora Apts1TIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 34 of 48 Lenora Short Flat dispersal through vegetation required. LOT 3 Lot size 5,984 sf Percent required to be mitigated 10 % of lot area "= area req'd mitigatedicredited 598 sf Zoning R-6 Max. allowable % impervious 70 %, KCC 2IA. 12.030 Max. allowable area impery by zoning 4,189 sf Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use 4,189 sf allowable (C. 2.9.2.1) Actual area of impervious Z393 sf Area to be credited under C.2.9 actual area - allowable = 1,796 sf 1,796 sf > 598 sf OKAY No additional mitigation required. dispersal through vegetation required. LOT 4 Lot size 6,567 sf Percent required to be mitigated 10 % of lot area "= area req'd mitigated/credited 657 sf Zoning R-6 Max. allowable % impervious 70 %, KCC 21A.12,030 Max. allowable area impery by zoning 4,597 sf Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use 4,597 sf allowable (C.2.9.2.1) Actual area of impervious Z393 sf Area to be credited under C.2.9 actual area - allowable = 2,204 sf 2,204 sf > 657 sf OKAY No additional mitigation required. dispersal through vegetation required. LOT 5 Lot size 7,051 sf Percent required to be mitigated 10 % of lot area "= area req'd mitigated/credited 705 sf Zoning R-6 Max. allowable % impervious 70 %, KCC 21A.12.030 Max_ allowable area impery by zoning 4,936 sf Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use 4,936 sf allowable (C.2.9.2.1) Actual area of impervious 2,393 sf Area to be credited under C_2.9 actual area - allowable = 2,543 sf 2,543 sf > 705 sf OKAY No additional mitigation required. dispersal through vegetation required. 12/2312008c:~ & Site Civil DesignV-enora Ap&177R Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 35 of 48 Lenora Short Plat LOT 6 Lot size Percent required to be mitigated "= area req'd mitigated/credited Zoning Max. allowable % impervious Max. allowable area impery by zoning Use smaller of 4, 000 or max, > use Actual area of impervious Area to be credited under C.2.9 actual area - allowable = No additional mitigation required. dispersal through vegetation required. 5,797 sf 10 % of lot area 580 sf R-6 70 %, KCC 21 A.12.030 4,058 sf 4,058 sf allowable (C.2.9.2.1) 2, 393 sf 1,665 sf 1,665 sf > 580 sf OKAY 12/23l200MUNat & site Civil gesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 06-12-22.doc Page 36 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Exisdng/New P. G.LS. Draw-hW IREA pF EXISIIWG PG!& 6.371 $F AWA L ICI: M' P.G.L.^ - UAW SF. 12/23J MC.-UnDt & Site Civil DesignlLenora Aptsl77R L Page o12 of 48 Lenora Short Plat Existmg/Neu' Total impe ;4ous Areas Drawing 1640 SF 1665 SF 1550 SF AREA of EXISrnvC P61S.- 6,311 s.r. 4855�-6311-11,166 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREAS r----------� r----__------ I I I I �---_----- I L------- I I I I V-11 L.----------- � I AREA OF NEW P.G..I.S - 5-Wa SF I I I I I zaz €r� I zce+�u: f rwff I I I I I zawsr. I L.--_---- I I I I 6,8oe + 612,393 - 21,f66 S.F. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS Z2/23WMC:IPIat 8 Site Civil DesignlLenora Apt$jTlR Len � �8 Of 48 Lenora Short Plat PARTS C & D: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM Runoff Control The Project is subject to Appendix C. Proposed Flow Control BMPs The BMP chosen is Reduced Impervious Area Credit, C.2.9. 12/2 IMMCAPIat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 39 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION V: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN ON -SITE CONVEYANCE In order to comply with the requirement for discharge at the natural location, it is proposed to direct storm runoff from the street to the west to offsite via surface flow; i.e., no underground storm conveyance system for the street is proposed. Roof runoff will be directed to splash blocks. 12a3 2008C:1Plat d Sine Civil DesignlLenora Apts1T1R Lenora W 12-22.doc Page 40 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION VI: SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES LIST OF SPECIAL REPORTS & STUDIES No special reports or studies have been prepared to date. 12/2=008C.1121at 3 Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsITIR Lenora 86-12-22.doc Page 41 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION VII: OTHER PERMITS PERMITS REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY USE The Right -of -Way use permit will be necessary to connect to the existing water system and to construct the new driveway drop access. PERMITS NOT REQUIRED The threshold triggering a requirement for each of the following permits has not been met. NPDES PERMIT FOREST PRACTICES PERMIT, Department of Natural Resources Project does not meet the threshold of 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber that triggers the requirement for a Forest Practices Permit_ SECTION 10, 401 and 404 PERMIT, Army Corps of Engineers No discharge of dredge material or fill into waters of the U.S., including wetlands, is contemplated. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (401), Department of Ecology The need for a 401 permit is automatically triggered by application for Federal license or permits, such as Section 404. It is certification by the State that the permitted activity complies with: • the stormwater discharge requirements of federal law • the aquatic protection requirements of State law. Application for Federal license or permit is not required. HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, Department of Fish and Wildlife (For work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of State waters. The Department is also responsible for implementing State guidelines for wetland protection.) 1Z2312008C:Wfat & Site Civil DesignlLenora Apts1TIR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 42 of 48 Lenora Short Plat An HPA permit is not required_ TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA, DOE (For activities in or near water that will temporarily cause violation of state water quality standards; in particular, the standard for turbidity) A permit for temporary modification of water quality will not be required. SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The project is not within a shoreline. FLOOD PLAIN REGULATORY PERMIT The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has not determined that floodplains exist within the Project site. 1Z23/2008C:1p1at & Site Civil DesigniLenora AptsllnR Lenora 08-12-22.doc page 43 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION VIII: ESC ANALYSIS & DESIGN REQUIRED TESL MEASURES These erosion control measures will be specified and discussed on the engineering drawings: 1) Clearing Limits: The site is to be cleared, and the perimeter fenced. Consequently, the "clearing limits" need to be flagged _ 2) Cover Measures: During the dry season, disturbed ground which is to remain unworked for a period of seven days will be directed to be covered. During the wet season, disturbed ground which is to remain unworked for a period of two days will be directed to be covered. 3) Perimeter Protection: Silt fence will be directed to be installed down -slope of all disturbed areas. 4) Traffic Area Stabilization: A rock construction entrance will be constructed in accordance with the drawings. 5) Sediment Retention: It is judged that the site is too small to usefully construct a sediment pond or cutoff trenches. These facilities would no sooner be constructed than they would be in the way and require relocation. 6) Surface Water Control: See above. 7) Dust Control: Dust control measures, consisting of spraying with a water truck, will be implemented if deemed necessary by the superintendent or the inspector. 8) Wet Season Construction: No wet season restrictions apply to this site to my knowledge. 9) Construction Within Sensitive Areas and Buffers: There will be no construction within a Sensitive Area. 1213/2008CAPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora /iptslTYR Lenora 08-12-22.doc Page 44 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION IX: BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, & DECLARATION OF COVENANT The Bond Quantity Worksheet will be included in the future TIR as an APPENDIX. A Declaration of Covenant is not warranted as the County will be maintaining the stormwater facilities. 12I23MWC:1Plat B site Civil aesignlLerrom apfslnR Lenora 08-42-2Zdoc Page 45 of 48 Lenora Short Plat SECTION X: MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL A Maintenance and Operations Manual is not warranted as no facilities are proposed. 12/ =008CAPtat & Site Civil DesigniLenora Apts%77R Lenora 08-42-22.doc Page 46 of 48 Lenora Short Plat APPENDIX A: BOND QUANTITY WORIKSHEET To be included in future "Technical Information Report" 12/-VM8C:IP1a1 & Sft Civil DWgnV-enora Apfs177R Lenora 08-92-22.doc Page 47 of 48 r- t � L-21 '� DEC 1 1 Z007 L b-1 56079 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Lenora 116th Ave SE Short Plat for Lenora Apartments, .LLC King County File #A07PM1976 Parcel Number 619660 0100 17800116" Ave SE Prepared by. anPLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN, LLC Dennis Alf edson, P.E. 3 7702 28e P1 SE Enumclaw, WA 98022-6828 December 6, 2007 104" FILE COPY S PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Lenora I I6th Ave SE Short Plat for Lenora Apartments, LLC King County File #A07PM1976 Parcel Number 619660 0100 17800116`h Ave SE Prepared by: .` PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGNf LLC V A Dennis Alfredson, .P E. vv�Ij 3 7702 280i" PI SE Enumclaw, WA 98022-6828 ON , - December 6, 2007 EXPIRES: _ � /' Lenora Short Plat TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION LPROJECT OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................................4 ProjectDescription & SUMMARY.............................................................................................................4 DesignStandards................................................................................................................................................. 4 ExistingConditions....................................................................................................................................4 CurrentDevelopment........................................................................................................................................... 4 Natural Drainage System Functions.................................................................................................................... 5 Wetlands and other Sensitive Areas............................................................. ........................................................ 5 Soils........................................................................................................................................................ ............ 5 TIRWorksheet..........................................................................................................................................6 Figure1: Vicinity Map......................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure2: Site Plan...................................................................................................................................... ...... 9 SECTION H: CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY.......................................................................10 2005 Surface water Design Manual Core Requirements... ... ......................... ....................................... 10 2005 Surface water Design Manual Special Requirements....................................................................11 SECTION III: OFF SITE ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................12 narrative........................................ .............. ........................................................................ ..................... 12 drainagesystem table.............................................................................................................................12 Figure 3: Downstream Flowpath Showing Contours....................................................................................... 13 Figure 4: Downstream Flowpath Showing Imagery.........................................................................................14 Figure5: Petrovitsky As-built........................................................................................................................... 15 SECTION IV: FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS & DESIGN....................16 PART A: Existing Site Hydrology ............................................................................................................16 PART 8: Developed Site Hydrology........................................................................................................16 ThresholdDischarge Area................................................................................................................................. 16 parts c & d: performance standards & flow control system.....................................................................16 HydrologicAnalysis........................................................................................................................................... 16 RunoffControl.................................•-•---•-----•--............................................................................------.................. 16 ProposedFlow Control BMPs........................................................................................................................... 17 WaterQuality Treatment.................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 6: Detention Pond & Wetpond Sue Calculation.................................................................................... 18 SECTION V: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN...................................................................19 On -Site Conveyance..................................................................................................................... .........19 Figure 7: On -Site Conveyance System............................................................................................................... 20 Figure 8: Backwater Conveyance System Check............................................................................................... 21 Figure 9: Tributary Areas to Catch Basins ....... ...... ...------------ •.......................................................................... 22 SECTION VI: SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES..........................................................................................23 list of special reports & studies..,. .................................................................................................. ......... 23 SECTIONVII: OTHER PERMITS.......................................................................................................................24 Permitsrequired.....................................................................................................................................24 Permitsnot required...... ...... _ ...................... ...........................................................................................24 SECTION VIII: ESC ANALYSIS & DESIGN....................................................................................................26 requiredtesc measures...........................................................................................................................26 SECTION IX: BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, & DECLARATION OF COVENANT ... 27 121612007LN21at & Site Civil UesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 2 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION X: MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL..........................................................................28 APPENDIX A: BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET............................................................................................29 12M2007L:lRtat d Site Civil Design%Lenors AptsITIR Lenora 07-12-05.doe Page 3 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION is PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SUMMARY • 6 single-family lots on 0.97 acres. • Zoned R-6 e 2.5% average slope to the northeast. • Single drainage basin. • Stormwater runoff rate and duration is managed with a Level 2 detention pond. • Stormwater treatment will be accomplished with a wetpond, combined with the detention pond. • Design calculation of total area of impervious: 0.62 acres Area of pervious = all area not impervious = 0.35 acres in "till grass". • Drains to a wide Swale that runs northerly across the properties to the north, then northeast to the storm sewer in Petrovitsky. • Location is on the east side of 11 a Ave SE, a few hundred feet south of Petrovitsky. • The property to be platted consists .of a single tax parcel. The houses that once stood on it have been demolished under separate permit. • No streams or wetlands exist on site. • Soils are described by the SCS as Alderwood. A soils report has not been prepared. • Water is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. • Sewer is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District_ See the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. See the Site Plan in Figure 2. Des4w Standards • Design standards are taken from the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. • The Site is in a Level 2 (Conservation) Flow Control area, which requires matching stormwater flow durations for storms ranging from Y2 the 2-year up to the 50-year, as well as matching 2-year and 10-year peak flows. • Water quality treatment is required pursuant to Core Requirement #8. The site is within the Basic Water Quality Treatment Area. EXISTING CONDITIONS Current Development The parcel was formerly the site of two single-family homes, which have been demolished under separate permit. The site is cleared, with weeds. 1M2007L:"t & Site Civil CesignV-enors AptsITIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 4 of 29 Lenora Whorl Plat Natura/Dtamage System Functions One distinct "Threshold Drainage Area" exists. No channels are apparent on -site. The flow lines off the parcel are uniformly perpendicular to the northeast. To the east of this property is a lot with a single-family house, then another lot with house, then 118"' Ave SE_ The ground to the east falls away. There is no area tributary to this parcel. Wedands and other Sensitive Areas No Sensitive Areas have been found on site_ Soils • The Soil Conservation Service map shows soil type classified as Alderwood AgB, a till soil. 12/6/2007LAPlat & Site Civil DesigntLenora Apts1T1R Lenora 07-12-05,doc Page 5 of 29 Lenora Short Plat TIR WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner: Lenora Apartments Address 11121 NE 43rd Kirkland 98033 Phone 208 229-6602 Project Engineer: Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Company Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC Address 37702 2801h PI SE Enumclaw 98022-6828 Phone: (253) 334-6990 PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION SUBDIVISION X SHORT SUBDIVISION GRADING COMMERCIAL OTHER PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name: Lenora 118 Ave SE Preliminary Short Plat Township 23N Range 5E Section 33 Project Size: 0.97 acres Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 Acres PART 4 OTHER PERMITS DORIG HPA SHORELINE MNGT COE 404 ROCKERY DOE DAM SAFETY STRUCTURAL VAULTS FEMA FLOODPLAIN OTHER COE WETLANDS HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN COMMUNITY: Soos Creek DRAINAGE BASIN: Soos Creek PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS RIVER FLOODPLAIN STREAM WETLANDS CRITICAL STREAM REACH SEEPSISPRINGS DEPRESSIONSISWALES HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE LAKE GROUNDWATER RECHARGE STEEP SLOPES OTHER LAKESIDE/EROSION HAZARD PART 7 SOILS SOIL TYPE SLOPES EROSION POTENTIAL EROSIVE VELOCITIES Alderwood 2.5% Slight to Moderate ADDITIONAL SHEETS ATTACHED SEE FIGURE 4 12l$M2007L:tPlat & Site Civil DesignU-enora Apts1T1R Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 6 of 29 Lenora Short Plat TIR WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS Page 2 of 2 REFERENCE LIMITATIONISITE CONSTRAINT None [ ] Additional Sheets Attached PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grading Restrictions X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities X Cover Practices Flag Limits of NGPES X Construction Sequence Other Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Grass Lined Channel Tank Infiltration Method of Analysis KCRTS X Pipe System Vault Depression Open Channel Energy Dissipator Flow Dispersal X D Pond Wetland Waiver X Wet Pond Stream Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation, Collect runoff in storm sewer system. Convey to detention pond, then large sand filter. Roof downspouts to be connected to the conveyance sstem. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility [ ] Additional Sheets Attached Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS (Mav reouire special structural review) Cast in Place Vault X1 Retaining Wall X Rocke > 4' Hi h Structural on Steep Slope Other PART 12 EASEMENTS1TRACTS Stream buffer Easement, across lots adjoining stream Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement X1 Tra t, stormwater ponds S am tract PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual sfteAonditiorjA as obsqw6d were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the inform ion pro ded hW§rjs accurate. U /'—a 92/6/2007L:tPiat & Site Civil DesignIenora AptsMl? Lenora 07-12-05.doe Page 7 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 1.- Vicinity Map 3 fir• = S ■ � 25 Se t71;1h A � � -• i Se 113ia 5[ Fy r r N Ss• 171M a Se ON RA Se 168th St ., Se. 1691h SL 'f u Ff R ae grist St 5e LILA th �yati� Sc 1lLst Yl Se 112W 5t a ti x a Sc 02ntl Ln t7;� � �j J J �•Y •y .. K i J J. Sa lath St .• 5e 176th St Se Petltrldslt9 N g m nq 8enswt Ftilt Se 1591h St St: 1lt11h 5[ .S se 17isl l» a Se 112nd St q 4 M Se 119M Fh x 1 T9lli PL 1l se 18uth St w S¢ 1tl6W St i d Se t615t St `.>P. 1B1c1 Sty -i v Sr 181t1 1tl2rw S[ K Se 182nd V 5e 1630 SL Se 161rd St m q' •• < c - H'3'6 L t Sc 1631d VI SC - -E iF - Sc le'" St ;e 891h Ln Se 184th R Se 1961h Sl MW.wfd `'y Se 165[h f+l d.` MA Se t [ No % Sc 166th pi 3 T c st 18B1h 51 " se 18A7f•. St S Se 189th 5t Sc L890 Q 5 189th In = 5 se But F1 121612007LAPiat & Site Civil DeslgnlLenora AptstTIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 8 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 2.• Site Platy _ — 3E'3AW HLD c 1216(W07L:;Plat B Site Civil DeslgnlLenora Apts1TIR Lenora 07-12-05.doe Page 9 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION II: CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2005 SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL CORE REQUIREMENTS 1. Discharge at the Natural Location (1.2.1): Stormwater currently runs off along the northeast side. Discharge from the pond will be routed to a dispersal trench built along the northeast side_ It is anticipated that an attempt will be made to obtain easements from the neighbors to the east in order to tightline to the ditch on 118"' Ave SE so that it is not necessary to discharge via a dispersal trench. 2. Offsite Analysis (1.2.2): See SECTION Ill. 3. Flow Control (1.2.3): See SECTION IV. 4. Conveyance System (1.2.4): See SECTION V. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control (1.2.5): See SECTION VIII_ B_ Maintenance and Operation (1.2.6): See SECTION X. 7. Financial Guarantees and Liability (1.2.7); See SECTION IX. 8. Water Quality (1.2. 8) See SECTION IV. 12f&2007L:1P1af & Site Civil DesignlLenora Apts1T1R Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 10 of 29 Lenora Short Plat 2005 SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements (1.3.1.): To my knowledge, no extraordinary area -specific drainage requirements have been established. • Basin Plan: Not applicable. • Lake Management Plans_ Not applicable. 2. Flood Hazard Delineation (1.3.2) The site is not within or adjacent to a lake, wetland, closed depression, floodway or fioodplain. 3. Flood Protection Facilities (1.3.3): The project does not propose to rely on an existing flood protection facility or modify one. 4. Source Control (1.3.4): The Project does not require a commercial building permit or commercial site development permit. 5. Oil Control (1.3.5) The project does not propose development or redevelopment of a "high use" site. 12WO07L.lPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora Apts1TIR Lenora 07-12-05.doe Page 11 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION III: OFF SITE ANALYSIS NARRATIVE Stormwater runs off the site in unconcentrated sheet flow at the northeast comer. The property to the east has a berm pushed up close to its west property line. It might be speculated that the berm's purpose is to impede the flow of runoff from this parcel, but whether or not it was intended to serve this function, that is in fact what it does. Runoff enters a depression on the southwest side of the parcel to the north and east. There is no evidence that standing water has been a problem. Runoff leaves the depression and flows northerly along the property lines through a fairly large swath of trees. Approximately 100 feet south of Petrovitsky, the contours turn a form a broad swale draining to the northeast_ The swale runs between a house and its garage. Runoff then hits Petrovitsky, where it is picked up in the storm sewer running east. East of 118"' Ave SE is the % mile point. This point happens to coincide with an apparent wetland on the south side of Petrovitsky. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE The Drainage System Table will be prepared after design is complete and will be included in the "Technical Information Report" that will be submitted with the engineering drawings. 421&2007L:lplat $ Site Civil DesignlLenora Aptsl?W Lenora 07-42-05.doc page 12 of 29 Lenora ,Short Plat Figute 3: Downstream Flonpath Showing Contours DRAINAGE PATH 12/6/2007LIPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 13 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 4- Downstream Flowpath Showing Imagery �.: tt y gmem '�'La • 't area_ i;_' ar.es '£''lam - ,.� R,4 - - ` -, .. R qqyy I r k-� - - ti ..� 6A.. � _ �.•' '��1! Aim }i ..� Wr -CT ..- 17 y R$ R-6 f R,6 -. 4 i R-8 DRAINAGE PATH 12/6J2007LAPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptslTIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 14 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 5., Petrm*skyAs-built T 7 7 ri- (3) PI �i 6-A 24, OF "j. cz,., APOA .0 WA Y SEC2-,'OiV 4 m,p, c, ws, Oc,4AICIIV ow, CV. "frAY EXCAVATION IDWAy FXcAV,4.VOA' 14 sp; CU. Y104, 6ANKMEA'r 177 W. YN Z, 27 m 54 17 12WM7L:IP(at & Site Civil DesignILenora AptsIT7R Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 15 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION IV: FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS & DESIGN PART A. EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY The site is largely cleared, with weeds. Slopes are 2.5%. Soils are a till type. Drainage is southwest -to -northeast, into an offsite depression, then a Swale flowing northerly across the parcels to the north. There is no area tributary to the site. PART B: DEVELOPED SITE HYDROLOGY Threshold Discharge Area The project site will be developed as residential housing. A storm conveyance system will be designed to collect runoff from all roofs, streets, and driveways. The conveyance system will outfall at a detention pond sized to Level 2 criteria. PARTS C & D: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM Hydrologic Analysis For Preliminary Short Plat purposes, the volume required for detention, as would be more precisely determined by KCRTS, is estimated using a method outlined on the King County DOES web page ftp:/ldnr_metrokc.qov/wlrldss/kcrts/pondvolxls The area within the building setbacks is less than 3,000 s.f. Therefore, the area per lot used in calculating the total impervious was set at 3,000 sT (as opposed to the 4,000 s.f. cited in the Manual). If it is required by King County, the Final Plat can include a provision limiting the impervious area per lot to 3,000 s.f. average. All developed area other than impervious was assigned as till -grass. Postdeveloped - Till grass 0.62 A Impervious 0.35 A Runoff Control The Project site is within a Level 2 Flow Control Area. 121&2007L:W1at & Site Civil AesignlLenora Apts171R Lenora 07-42-05.doc Page 16 of 29 Lenora Short Plat The soils will not infiltrate sufficiently to use an infiltration pond, the preferred method. Consequently, a detention pond has been sized and its outline roughly designed. Proposed Flow Control BMPs The possible use of flow control B.M.P.s was examined in accordance with Section 1.2.3.3 and Section 5,2 of the SWDM. As noted in Section 5.2, the emphasis on use of B.M.P.s is primarily focused on single -lot developments, as opposed to subdivisions. Section 1.2.3.3 refers to Table 1.2.3.0 (page 1-41) for facility sizing credits if one or more of the various listed flow control B.M.P.s are utilized. It is the judgment of this engineer that none of the listed B_M.P.s are practical for use as a citation to justify a facility sizing credit. Water Quality Treatmetatt The Project site is within a Basic Water Quality Treatment Area. As such, the designer may choose from the options given under the Basic Water Quality Menu in Section 6.1.1. One of those options is "Wetpond.n The area and depth required for the wetpond is calculated on the following page, and has been set aside in the Preliminary Plat layout. 12W2007L:1Ptat d Site Civil DesigalLenors AptslTlR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 17 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 4 - Detention Pond & Wetpond Size Calculation PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN, LLC LENORA 116TH AVE SE SHORT PLAT King County pond size estimator Sea-Tac Level 2 Till Forest factor converted to impervious - streetisidewalk 3600 sf = 0.08 A 4.87 1461 c.f. converted to impervious - access tracts 3420 sf = 0.08 A 4.87 1388 c.f. converted to impervious - 116th frontage 2115 sf = 0.05 A 4.87 858 c.f. converted to impervious - houses 18000 sf = 0.41 A 4.87 7305 c.f. total impervious 27135 converted to pervious grass 16118 sf = 0.35 A 1 A0 1764 c.f. TOTALS 69388 sf = 1.59 A 12,776 c.f. Wetpond Design Design by method of'05 KC5WDM pages 6-70 through 6-72 1 Identity required wetpool volume factor (0 f = 3 given 2 Determine rainfall 0 for the mean annual storm R = 0.039 ft, from chart page 6-69 3 Calculate runoff from the mean annuai storm (Vr) for the developed site Volume of runoff Vr = (0.9*Ai + 0.25`Atg + 0.10*Atf + 0.01*Ao) * R Ai = 27,135 sf Atg - 15,118 sf Atf = 0 sf Ao = 0 sf Vr 1,100 cf 4 Calculate wetpood volume Vb required Vb required = f * Vr = 3 1100 3,300 cf 121612007L:1Plaf & Site Civil DesigniLenom AptslTIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 18 of 29 0 Lenora Short Plal SECTION V: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN ON -SITE CONVEYANCE Conveyance will be via a pipe system pursuant to Section 1.2.4.1 designed to convey 25-year flow. Areas of impervious/pervious that are tributary to each catch basin, including the future houses and driveways, will be measured. The calculations of required conveyance pipes sizes and slopes as determined by Manning's equation will be included in the "Technical Information Report" that accompanies the engineering drawings. 12W2007L:%P1at & Site Civil DesignlLenorn Apts1TIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 19 of 29 Lenora Short flat Figure 7.• On -Site Conveyance System To be included in future TIR 121512007L:IPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptslTlR Lenora 07-12-05.dx Page 20 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 8.• Backwater Conveyance System Check To be included in future TIR 12/6J2007L:lPlat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsITIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 21 of 29 Lenora Short Plat Figure 9.• TtibutaryAreas to Catch Basins To be included in future T}R. Note: All area on the east side of street centerline is tributary to CB 1. All area west of centerline is tributary to CB 2. The length of street tributary to these catch basins is less than 200 feet_ 12/&2007L:1Plat & Site MY DeslgniLenora Apts;TlR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 22 of 29 Lenora S'horl Plat SECTION VI: SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES LIST OF SPECIAL REPORTS & STUDIES No special reports or studies have been prepared to date_ ?2/6/2007L:1Piat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 07-12-03.doc Page 23 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION VII: OTHER PERMITS PERMITS REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY USE The Right -of -Way use permit will be necessary to connect to the existing water system. NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT An NPDES permit from the State DOE is required. PERMITS NOT REQUIRED The threshold triggering a requirement for each of the following permits has not been met. FOREST PRACTICES PERMIT, Department of Natural Resources Project does not meet the threshold of 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber that triggers the requirement for a Forest Practices Permit. SECTION 10, 401 and 404 PERMIT, Army Corps of Engineers No discharge of dredge material or fill into waters of the U.S., including wetlands, is contemplated. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (401), Department of Ecology The need for a 401 permit is automatically triggered by application for Federal license or permits, such as Section 404. It is certification by the State that the permitted activity complies with: • the stormwater discharge requirements of federal law • the aquatic protection requirements of State law. Application for Federal license or permit is not required. HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, Department of Fish and Wildlife (For work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of State waters. The Department is also responsible for implementing State guidelines for wetland protection.) 42(& M7LARaf & Site civil AesignlLenora AptsITIR Lenora 07-42-05.doc Page 24 of 29 Lenora Short Plat An HPA permit is not required. TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA, DOE (For activities in or near water that will temporarily cause violation of state water quality standards; in particular, the standard for turbidity) A permit for temporary modification of water quality will not be required. SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The project is not within a shoreline. FLOOD PLAIN REGULATORY PERMIT The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has not determined that floodplains exist within the Project site. 1202007LARat & Site Civil DesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 25 of 29 Lenora Short flat SECTION VIII: ESC ANALYSIS & DESIGN REQUIRED TESC MEASURES These erosion control measures will be specified and discussed on the engineering drawings: 1) Clearing Limits: The site is to be cleared, and the perimeter fenced. Consequently, the "clearing limits' need to be flagged . 2) Cover Measures: During the dry season, disturbed ground which is to remain unworked for a period of seven days will be directed to be covered. During the wet season, disturbed ground which is to remain unworked for a period of two days will be directed to be covered. 3) Perimeter Protection: Silt fence will be directed to be installed down -slope of all disturbed areas. 4) Traffic Area Stabilization: A rock construction entrance will be constructed in accordance with the drawings. 5) Sediment Retention: It is judged that the site is too small to usefully construct a sediment pond or cutoff trenches. These facilities would no sooner be constructed than they would be in the way and require relocation. 6) Surface Water Control: See above. 7) Dust Control: Dust control measures, consisting of spraying with a water truck, will be implemented if deemed necessary by the superintendent or the inspector. 8) Wet Season Construction: No wet season restrictions apply to this site to my knowledge. 9) Construction Within Sensitive Areas and Buffers: There will be no construction within a Sensitive Area. 121&2007L:1Plat & Site Civil Design%Lenora AptsITIR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 26 of 29 Lenora Short Play SECTION IX: BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, & DECLARATION OF COVENANT The Bond Quantity Worltsheet will be included in the future TIR as an APPENDIX. A Declaration of Covenant is not warranted as the County will be maintaining the stormwater facilities. 1216/2007L:1Plat & site Civil 8esignlLenora Aptsir/R Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 27 of 29 Lenora Short Plat SECTION X: MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL A Maintenance and Operations Manual is not warranted as the County will be maintaining the stormwater facilities. 12/&2007L:1Piat & Site Civil aesignlLenora AptsMR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 28 of 29 r Lenora Short Plat APPENDIX A: BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET To be included in future "Technical Information Report" 121612007LAPlat & Site Civil AesignlLenora AptslTlR Lenora 07-12-05.doc Page 29 of 29 itr King County Road uaervicea Division Department of Transportation 261 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 TYPE OF CERTIFICATE September 28, 2007 ® ORIGINAL Certificate # 04061 ❑ CONDITIONAL File Number: 07-09-13-01 Expires: September 28, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY ❑ Specific conditions are described on the reverse side of this certificate. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied. IWORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a development permit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. 1. Applicant Name and Address: Dennis Alfredson 37702 280th PI. SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 Property Location: a. Property Address: 17804116th Ave. SE b. Development Name: c. Parcel Number: 6196600100 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Short Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Fancily Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 798 Community Planning Area: Soos Creek i. Commercial Project -Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Multi -family - Number of Units: 0 iii. Single family - Number of Units: 6 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: September 28, 2008 unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. if this requirement is not met the King County Department of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a development permit with King County's Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part of the development application package. if you have any questions, please call (206) 2634759. Department of Transportation King County, Washington �. t ,, DEC 11 zuu I L07SO075 0XV4 1� King county Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 11 /28/2007 SUBDIVISION DENSITY & DIMENSION CALCULATIONS For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. y DEC 11 ?007 K.C, D.D.E.S �07SOO-77 File Number (To be filled in by DDES) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed subdivision or short subdivision meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worksheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre -application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call 206-296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre -application conference. Worksheet Prepared BY: � Date: � ((Print Name) Subdivision Name: _ -� %/ +✓"" '_ ._����_� Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Zoning: Ji If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THE APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THIS FORM I. Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.1172) also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.080): Site area (in square feet) is the TOTAL horizontal area of the project site. SubdivOensityDimensionCakcFORM.doc lc -cal subden.pdf 111=007 Page 1 of 6 CJo Calculation: r l-- Gross horizontal area of the project site Site area in square feet - {— NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 -� Site area in acres NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply_ Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. Example: If the site area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed_ (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) IL Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 - .040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. , r du/acre III. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding (K.C.C. 21A.12.070): The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 - _040 tables). (�?. !77 site area in acres (see Section 1.) X base density (see Section 11) (a allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up, and B. Fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. MOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2.75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E).) IV. Required On -site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.180): This section must be completed only if the proposal is a residential development if more than four dwelling units in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any mixed use development if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C_C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X proposed number of studio and one bedroom units 170 square feet X proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement SubdivDens4DimensionCaleFDRM.doe local-subden_pdf W2812007 Page 2 of 6 Required On -site Recreation Space Continued Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows; 390 square feet X� proposed number of units Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X _ _ _ proposed number of units V. Net Buildable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.797): This section is used for computing minimums density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section 1) less the following areas: areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights -of -way in excess of sixty (60') of width + critical areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped + ' areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, retentionldetention ponds, biofitration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on -site recreation areas. Deduct area within stormwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as allowed by K.C.0 21A.14.180 (see Section iV) + regional utility corridors, and + other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped ' Total reductions Calculation: � site area in square feet (see Sectionl) 14) j Total reductions �{ Net buildable area in square feet NOTE_ convert site area is square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 [J Net buildable area in acres VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.Q60): The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11) by the net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.G. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements maybe phased or waived by King County in certain cases. (See K.C_C. 21A.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fail City. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(13)12.) Calculation: base density in dulac (sce Section tl) X L -7 Net buildable area in acre:. (see Section V) X minimum density % set forth in K.C.C_ 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VIl - S� minimum dwelling units required SubdWDensdyDimensionCaicrOHM. doc IL-cal-subden.pdf 1112BJ2007 Page 3 of 6 It Vll. Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.087): Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.G.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5°% median slope value = + T sq, ft 5-10°% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value = + _ _ sq_ ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value = + sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value = + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5°% median slope value + sq. ft 30-35°% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value - sq_ ft 3540°% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value = Total square feet in net buildable area Calculation: + + Total square feet adjusted for slope total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area - weighted average slope of net buildable area °% (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -- round up to nearest whole percent) U�;c3 thy: wblc below to dlAurrniru; the rnirrirrrurn dcn*ity factor. This density is substituted for tho Minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section Vi of this worksheet. EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENT S f Ok MODLF;A1 E SLOPES: sq- ft 0-5°% slope increment X 2.5% median slope valve - + 10,000 sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5°% median slope value + 20,000 , sq, ft 10-15°% slope increment X 12.5°% median slope value + sq. (t 15--20°% slope increment X 17.5°% median slope value + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value + sq_ ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value = + sq. ft 30-35°% slope increment X 32,5°% nicdian slope value: + sq- ft. 35-40°% slope increment X 37.5 °% median slope value = _ 30,000 Total square feet in not buildable area 750 + 2,500 + + 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area _ .108333 Weighted average slope of net buildable area 11°% (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent--- roundup to nearest vvhole percent) Using the table above, an 11 % weighted average slope of net buildable area fails within the 5°% -- less than 15°% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11°% is 6"% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. SubdivDensityoirnensionCalcFORM.doe lc-cat-subden.pdi 1112812fi97 *age 4 of 6 Vill. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 - .040): This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (KC-C. 21A_34) or transfer of density rights (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section III of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section 11) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density rights is 150 percent of the base density (see Section tl) of the underlying zoning of the development. base density in dwelling units per acre see (Section 11) X 150% = maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C_C_ 21A.34) maximum density base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11) X 200% = maximum density maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11) X 150% = maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A_37) Calculation: base allowable dwelling units calculated in Section III bonus units authorized by K.C.C_ 21A.34 transfer units authorized by K.C.C_ 21A.37 total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) DC. Minimum Lot Area For Construction (K.C.C. 21A.12.100): Except as provided for nonconformances in K.C.C. 21A.32: maximum density A. In the UR and R zones, no construction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2,500 square feet or that does not comply with the applicable minimum lot width, except for townhouse developments, zero -lot -line subdivisions, or lots created prior to February 2, 1995, in a recorded subdivision or short subdivision which complied with applicable laws, and; B. In the A, F, or RA Zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. Construction shalt be limited to one dwelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but less than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12.100) SubdivDensityDimensionCalcFORM.doc ie-cal subden.pdf 112=007 Page 5 of 6 L_-�So079 Web date: 10111/2007 WAIVER REQUEST FOR SHORT SUBDIVISION King County Department of Development �� DEC I PRE -APPLICATION PROCESS and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 ii.G. D.D.E,S. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Short Subdivision Pre -Application Waiver Request There are three required pre -application meetings an applicant and his/her agent must attend, prior to filing a short subdivision (often called a "short plat") application. Waivers are not -generally approved. If you feel unusual circumstances exist to justify approval of a waiver, please fill out this form and submit it for consideration. The Director or designee may waive the requirement to attend one or more of the following meetings, if it is determined to be unnecessary for the review of a short plat application_ PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Identify the meeting for which a waiver is being requested: ❑ Informational Meeting ® Pre -application Feasibility Meeting ❑ Application Review Meeting (Step 1) (Step 2) (Step 3) Date November 26, 2007 Project Name Lissak Short Plat Site Address 17804 1161h Ave SE Parcel Number(s) 619660 0100 Applicant's Name Max Lissak Applicant's Phone (206) 229-6602 E-mail mlissak@gmail.com Applicant's Mailing Address 11121 NE 43rd St, Kirkland 98033 Agent's Name Dennis Alfredson Agent's Phone (253) 334-6990 E-mail dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com Agent's Mailing Address 37702 28& PI SE, Enumclaw 98022 Applicant/Agent's rationale for waiver: A pre -application meeting has been held, but due to delays in obtaining water and sewer availability certificates, the six-month deadline could not be met. Based on the rationale noted above, I agree ❑ do not agree to waive the required pre - application meeting(s) identified above. le t )�2Jw,al ~DES'Director or Director's Designee# tom' ! Date Check out the DDES Web sit at www.kingcounty.gov/permits ShortPlatPreAppWaiverRegFORM.doc Ic-wai-shplatpreap. pdf 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 1{/� King County Department of Qevelopment and Environmental Services Land Use Services flivision 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Applicant: Max Lissak LenoraiApar#ments 11121, NE 4:3ra Street. Kirkland, WA 98033 Engineer• PMP, inc Paul Morrow 726 Auburn 'l a.y:N Auburbi Wi4 98602 Notice of Application (Type 2) File No: L07-S0079 Lenora Short:Plat 'DES Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkord'i Telephone Na., ;(206) 296-7173 Email: fareshteh.dehkordi§kingcounty.gov Date Application Filed:. December.11, 2007 Date Determined Complete: January 9, 2008 Protect Location: 17802 110 Avenue SE, Postal City Renton Project Description: Subdivision of a .97-acre. parcell into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone. Permits requested in this application`:'Shaft Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above address: NIA Other permits no# included In this application, known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on February 19, 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DDES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DDES decision. However, the DDES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailine: January 252008 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No.: L07SO079 ( Please print) Name: Address: Telephone No.: King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal Type2 NOA f � N VV 414, S 33, T 25 N, R 05 E, WA a - f � f I ENS!NG NK 10 NIK YARET MN 1 �pAR P' Wf}'JYI! AS. { l ~ 2 L \ I I I TRACT�--� I r16cREAT10fi - ---- .---� i z ROAD A- ....... PFWATI: ACCESS TRACE PEGMO"CCE59 mr—.------.---- !_ a d: ..:. - - - - - - __1 --- -- I I 6 I I 5 I I q I DEC 112007 K.C. D.D.E.. Lo-7 Soo? 9 oil PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ACREAGE: 0.97 NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED', R. EIRSTINC TONE: R-15 PROPOSED USE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL � SEWER DISTRICT: 5O0S CREEK WATER I SEWER WATER DISTRICT.. SODS CREEK WATER & SEWER SCHOOL DISTRICT: RLNTOH 0403 FIRE 0I5TRICT: RING CD. FIRE PROTECTION DIST. 40 TELEPHONE SERVICES: OWEST POWER SOURCE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY -, Z 8 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT STANDARD: 945IC C0 FLOW CONTROL STANDARD, C(ASERVATION [ry BUILDING SETBACKS.- SIDE' S' W f] REAR: 5 FRONT: 10' GARAGE: 20'�a m LEGAL DESCRIPTION Q D— f LOT 5 DF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1, RECORDED UNDER RECOPOINC, NUMBER 194804013788397 4 � J a � Q g a. F-m c a 04� z Lh Q r J w �l CF IL a 0 Z w J Department of L-9 Development and Environmental 9ekvic`e_� -.-J OAK-DE-0100 King County 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 V Max Lissak Lenora Apts. LLC 11121 NE 43rd St Kirkland WA 98033 149 suc!i t#umiacR UNAB r- '7O F-ORWARD ��`•`--0�='•�='����'�-"��i� l�slsslss�sl�s;s��r�slsrs�s�sl�ss�:�sssl�ss�alf�lrs}�;s;ssi��� Department of LQ Deve#apment and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 King County 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 6196600320r1,07S0079 VERMA SUN1L K 17633 1 18TF1 AVE SE RE,NTON WA 9805R t4I X T Z 9.so PeTUAIN TO SENOtR NOT DEL.IVMRABL.E AS ADDRESSED UMAC)LE TO FORWARD BC: 900S7S.S1999 C�O:2F3 QOSD -2 - 3'3 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above - File No.: L07SO079 ( Please print) Name: .rI rf®d?y7* L.�J / „aRtls Address:_�x „!�9 ITfQ Telephone No-: M4E King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal Type2 NDA JOSEPH COSORUS PO BOX 59593 1 A DENTON, WA 98058 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST RENTON, WA 98055-1219 111JI 1;111f ill I fl] I it fill fillki 1 '11111 JA King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kinacounty.aov February 3, 2009 Max Lissak 11121 Northeast 53"' Street Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Revised Fee Estimate: L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Dear Mr. Lissak: K C. D.D.E,S The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has determined that additional review fees are required based on: ® The applicant failed to provide accurate, complete or timely information. ® The applicant failed to disclose a site or development issue that creates the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ® The applicant changed the scope or design of the proposal, creating the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ❑ The applicant fails to complete the construction of the project in a timely manner, creating the need for additional review, unanticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ❑ The applicant files an appeal and the Fee Estimate did not anticipate an applicant appeal. ❑ The applicant makes a request to separate the review of the project into distinct phases. ❑ There has been unauthorized construction on the property, including, but not limited to, clearing or grading, or an associated code enforcement case is opened. ❑ The King County Council modified permit fees. ❑ The project is modified, such that there is a change in the building valuation and the resulting building valuation fees. ti� King County Land Use Services Division Revised Fee Estimate AcknowIedgement Form Permit Number: L07SO079 Date: February 3, 2009 Permit Title: Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Permit Subtype: The additional fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, project -related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Original Fee Estimate: Hourly Fees: (122 Hours x $140.00) $17,080.00 Fixed, Base Fees $422.62 Original Fee Estimate Total: $17,502.62 Additional Fees Required: Hourly Fees: (90 Hours x $140.00) $12,600.00 Fixed, Base Fees $25.00 Total Additional Fees: $12,625.00 Total Revised Fee Estimate: $30,127.62 Amount Previously Paid: $17,527.62 TOTAL DUE NOW: F $12,600.00 Note: The revised estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total original estimated number of hours plus the additional estimated hours, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the original estimate was completed. The total revised estimated hours reflect work performed by some, or all, of the various disciplines listed on the enclosed Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet. The applicant is required to submit a signed copy of this form, acknowledging the revised estimated cost of this permit, within 17 days of the date of this letter. Failure to do so will result in the loss of your right to dispute and appeal the re -estimate and may result in the cancellation of the application. Accept t eti Estimate Appl i t/07 N (print) Applicant/ r Name (signature) ❑ Dispute the Fee Estimate [See attached procedure] ate For further questions on this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact the Project Manager,J.9;yiny Henoch, at (206) 296-6632. Fanny Hepbch, Project & Program Manager III Land Use Services Division cc: File No. PM FeeRevision_Apro8.doc King County INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS, BILLING/PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT PLANS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, APPEALS AND FINANCE CHARGES Your application is being reviewed under the Project Management program, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Checks may be made out to King County Finance. Typically 100% of the estimate is due prior to assigning your permit for review. Failure to do this may result in cancellation of your application. The Department may remove your project from the Project Management program under the following conditions: • During project review, the applicant changes the proposal to such an extent that the project is below the Project Management threshold. • To accommodate State and Federal procurement regulations. • In accordance with other contractual agreements between the Department and the applicant, including but not limited to Financial Guarantees. • The applicant requests and the Department concurs, if the Department determines that no value will be added to the overall project or it creates a redundancy in the Project Management process. • Projects in default as defined by K.C.C. 27A.20.020. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: You will receive a monthly statement showing any used hours against the estimate. The statement also lists all fees and any past due amount, installment due or budget adjustments that must be paid by the first of the following month. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND APPEALS: By checking the Accept the fee estimate box, the applicantlowner accepts the fee estimate provided in this letter and waives the right to dispute the estimate. By checking the Dispute the fee estimate box, the applicant contests the fee estimate and requests a Director review and appeal of the fee estimate. The applicant must return the acknowledgement form accompanied by a statement of facts supporting the dispute to DDES within 17 days of the date of this fee estimate letter. DDES will issue a decision within 14 days of receipt of the applicant dispute. DDES' pp'' t files with DDES a conibineu Nctice and Statement of Appeal decision; is final ur�i�s the a �IC,iiil �i�e5 Vila together with the $50 appeal fee within 17 days after DDES mails the decision. The applicant may only appeal an adverse decision, in which DDES denied all or a portion of the dispute. The appeal is heard by the Hearing Examiner, who will conduct a closed record hearing on the fee estimate appeal. The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the fee estimate is unreasonable. If the Hearing Examiner determines that DDES' fee estimate was unreasonable, the Hearing Examiner may modify the fee estimate or provide other relief the Hearing Examiner determines is reasonably necessary. If the applicant is the substantial prevailing party on the appeal, the $50 appeal fee is refunded. The Hearing Examiner's decision is final. Acknowledgement and the required application materials are mandatory prior to the review of the permit application. In addition, you are still required to pay the deposit, current balance and any future installments. Failure to do so will result in finance charges. PMPeeRevision Apro$_doc 'i m LIM King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kincicounty.aov February 3, 2009 Max Lissak 11121 Northeast 53rd Street Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Revised Fee Estimate: L07SO079 Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Dear Mr. Lissak: The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has determined that additional review fees are required based on: ® The applicant failed to provide accurate, complete or timely information. ® The applicant failed to disclose a site or development issue that creates the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ® The applicant changed the scope or design of the proposal, creating the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ❑ The applicant fails to complete the construction of the project in a timely manner, creating the need for additional review, unanticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. ❑ The applicant files an appeal and the Fee Estimate did not anticipate an applicant appeal. ❑ The applicant makes a request to separate the review of the project into distinct phases. ❑ There has been unauthorized construction on the property, including, but not limited to, clearing or grading, or an associated code enforcement case is opened. ❑ The King County Council modified permit fees. ❑ The project is modified, such that there is a change in the building valuation and the resulting building valuation fees. LQ King County Land Use Services Division Revised Fee Estimate Acknowledgement Form Permit Number: L07SO079 Date: February 3, 2009 Permit Title: Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Permit Subtype: The additional fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, project -related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the proj ect's environmental review. Original Fee Estimate: Hourly Fees: (122 Hours x $140.00) $17,080.00 Fixed, Base Fees $422.62 Original Fee Estimate Total: $17,502.62 Additional Fees Required: Hourly Fees: (90 Hours x $140.00) $12,600.00 Fixed, Base Fees $25.00 Total Additional Fees: $12,625.00 Total Revised Fee Estimate: $30,127.62 Amount Previously Paid: $17,527.62 TOTAL DUE NOW: r $12,600.00 Note: The revised estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total original estimated number of hours plus the additional estimated hours, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the original estimate was completed. The total revised estimated hours reflect work performed by some, or all, of the various disciplines listed on the enclosed Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet. The applicant is required to submit a signed copy of this form, acknowledging the revised estimated cost of this permit, within 17 days of the date of this letter. Failure to do so will result in the loss of your right to dispute and appeal the re -estimate and may result in the cancellation of the application. ❑ Accept the Fee Estimate ❑ Dispute the Fee Estimate [See attached procedure] Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date Applicant/Owner Name (signature) For further questions on this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact the Project Manager►ny Henoch, at (206) 296-6632. Eanny Hep6ch, Project & Program Manager III Land Use Services Division cc: File No. PM FeeRevision_Apro8.doc LQ King County INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS, BILLINGIPAYMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT PLANS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, APPEALS AND FINANCE CHARGES Your application is being reviewed under the Project Management program, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Checks may be made out to King County Finance. Typically 100% of the estimate is due prior to assigning your permit for review. Failure to do this may result in cancellation of your application. The Department may remove your project from the Project Management program under the following conditions: • During project review, the applicant changes the proposal to such an extent that the project is below the Project Management threshold. • To accommodate State and Federal procurement regulations. • In accordance with other contractual agreements between the Department and the applicant, including but not limited to Financial Guarantees. • The applicant requests and the Department concurs, if the Department determines that no value will be added to the overall project or it creates a redundancy in the Project Management process. • Projects in default as defined by K.C.C. 27A.20.020. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: You will receive a monthly statement showing any used hours against the estimate. The statement also lists all fees and any past due amount, installment due or budget adjustments that must be paid by the first of the following month. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND APPEALS: By checking the Accept the fee estimate box, the applicantlowner accepts the fee estimate provided in this letter and waives the right to dispute the estimate. By checking the Dispute the fee estimate box, the applicant contests the fee estimate and requests a Director review and appeal of the fee estimate. The applicant must return the acknowledgement form accompanied by a statement of facts supporting the dispute to DDES within 17 days of the date of this fee estimate letter. DDES will issue a decision within 14 days of receipt of the applicant dispute. DDES' decision is final unless the applicant files with DDES a combined Notice and Statement of Appeal together with the $50 appeal fee within 17 days after DDES mails the decision. The applicant may only appeal an adverse decision, in which DDES denied all or a portion of the dispute. The appeal is heard by the Hearing Examiner, who will conduct a closed record hearing on the fee estimate appeal. The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the fee estimate is unreasonable. If the Hearing Examiner determines that DDES' fee estimate was unreasonable, the Hearing Examiner may modify the fee estimate or provide other relief the Hearing Examiner determines is reasonably necessary. if the applicant is the substantial prevailing party on the appeal, the $50 appeal fee is refunded. The Hearing Examiner's decision is final. Acknowledgement and the required application materials are mandatory prior to the review of the permit application. In addition, you are still required to pay the deposit, current balance and any future installments. Failure to do so will result in finance charges. PM FeeRevision_Apr08.doc PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN, LLC December 22, 2008 Fereshteh Dehkordi King County DDES, Land Use Services Div. 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 RE: Lenora Short Plat, KC File No. L07SO079 6-lot short plat Parcel # 619660 0100 Dear Fereshteh: DECEcmwso 2 s Zoua K.C. DDES. LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION In response to your December 16 letter, attached are six copies of the revised Preliminary Plat, Drainage Plan, and associated exhibit drawing of existing/new PGIS areas, as well as two copies of a revised Targeted TIR. A major change in concept has occurred since the last submittal. History: In a meeting regarding the position of King County to require water quality treatment using the Sphagnum Bog treatment menu, it was pointed out to me by Curt Crawford that the existing condition might have been of an area of pollution generating impervious surface such that the newly proposed area of PGIS would not trigger a requirement to treat water at all. This frankly had not occurred to me. Whether or not the necessary criterion was met hinged on two factors: 1) whether the existing driveway was asphalt (impervious) or gravel (pervious, perversely); 2) whether the amount of area difference was sufficiently small (<5,000 s.f.) between driveway placed before 1979 and the proposed new. Consequently, the contractor who removed the driveways was contacted. He provided an affidavit stating that the driveways were in fact asphalt. Then, an aerial photograph was obtained from AeroMetric (formerly Walker & Assoc) from 1977. The photo shows that the driveways existed at that time. The photo was converted to AutoCAD, the driveways outlined, and then measured. Then it became apparent that the total new impervious area might possibly be kept at or under the 10,000 s.f. threshold for treatment of the project in accordance with Appendix C, and therefore detention would also not be required. And in fact, the new impervious area added since 2001 can be kept at or under 10,000 s.£ assuming a covenant is recorded restricting the new impervious area of each house -sidewalk to 2,393 s.f. and house- 37702 280 PI SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 Tel (253) 334-6990 Fax (206)242-4209 email Bennis@platandsitecivildesign.com sidewalk -driveway to 2,793 s.f. Recording such a restrictive covenant is a common means of complying with Appendix C 2.9 Reduced Impervious Surface Credit. Therefore, the detention pond has been eliminated and the lots expanded somewhat. Fire Department Restriction A restriction on construction of houses on lots 3 and 4 is that the distance from the furthest point that a fire truck can be expected to travel (150 ft from centerline of cross street) to the rear of the houses cannot be more than 150 feet. This restriction can be accommodated. Conveyance System The storm conveyance system has been revised to eliminate underground piping in order to comply with the requirement to drain to natural location. PLAT. 8F7i`I- CIVIL DESIGN LLC. I/ J �J P.E. LN King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov December 16, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC 37702 280th Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies KC File L07SO079 Date of Complete Application: January 15, 2008 Lenora Short Plat We have reviewed the revised site plan received September 29, 2008 together with additional drainage information you provided and have the following comment: Drainage — 2005 Surface Water Design Manual The affidavit from Mike Terry of Brike Excavating & Underground Utilities LLC does not provide any information as to when the asphalt was placed on the site, nor does it specify how much asphalt was removed. The 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM), Chapter 1 - Key Terms and Definitions defines existing site conditions as: "...those that existed prior to May 1979 (when King County first required flow control facilities) as determined from aerial photographs and, if necessary, knowledge of individuals familiar with the area, unless a drainage plan for alteration to land cover has been approved by the County since May 1979 as part of a development permit approval. If so, existing site conditions are those created by the site improvements and drainage facilities constructed per the approved drainage plan." Please provide photographic evidence (aerial or other site photos) of the asphalt driveway, prior to 1979. It is also critical that you provide an estimate of the square footage of asphalt material (the demolition contractor may be able to add this information to his affidavit). An affidavit regarding the driveway surface and the date of construction from a previous owner or neighbor may be useful. If the driveway was paved after May of 1979, and without some kind of development permit, it cannot be considered an existing condition and thus cannot be credited toward an exemption from Core Requirement #8 (SWDM Section 1.2.8) Short of the supporting documents described above, your short plat will be subject to the KCSWDM Section 6.1.4 Sphagnum Bog Protection Menu water quality requirements. Roads — 2007 King County Road Design & Construction Standards (KCRDCS KCRDCS Section 2.09B allows access to a maximum of 6 lots via a Private Access Tract, (PAT). The PAT shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and not more than 150 feet long measured from centerline of intersecting street. The PAT will be owned and maintained by all property owners within the short plat. Please label this tract as Private Access Tract, Tract A on the revised site plan. Per King County Development Engineer memo dated April 2007 "Intersection Design Alternative for Private Access Tracts and Minor Access Streets", as an alternative to concrete curb radius on private access tracts or private streets, designers and property owners are encouraged to use a standard driveway drop at the intersection to a county road. Since the driveway connection does not preclude the ability to install a standard intersection with curb radii, no variance is required. Note that a driveway drop intersection design must still include all other aspects of an intersection (e.g. alignment, property line radii and sight distance requirements). We suggest replacing the proposed curb radius with a standard residential driveway approach (KCRDCS Fig. 3-004). KCRDCS Section 3.01C allows a joint use driveway to access not more than two lots. You may revise the site plan to show lot 2 as a pan -handle -lot with a direct access to the PAT. Lots 3 and 4 will be accessed by a 20-foot wide Joint Use Driveway Tract (JUDT) extending east from the PAT. The JUDT will be owned and maintained by Lots 3 and 4. Please label this tract as Joint -Use Drive -way Tract, Tract B an the revised site plan. - For any questions regarding the road or drainage requirements, Please contact Brian Norton at (206) 296-7118, at brian.norton@kingcounty.gov If you have any questions regarding the short plat process or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Please submit the following by January 30, 2009: A revised site plan addressing the lot and road design issues discussed above. Please provide 6 copies Six copies of a revised drainage plan matching the revised site plan Supporting documents clarifying type and age of the driveway which was removed. The supporting documents could be an affidavit signed by person($) knowledgeable about the site and its previous history and or information derived from aerial photos. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Max Lissak, Applicant Lanny Henoch, Senior Planner, Current Planning Section Brian Norton Engineer II, Engineering Review Section Application File SOC Page 1 of 4 , fyljr� Henoch, Lanny Z-0;7549z�79 From: Foley, Steve Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 8:58 AM To: 'Dennis Alfredson' Cc: Crawford, Curt; Max Lissak; Rhoads, Kate; Henoch, Lanny; Casey, Laura; Gillen, Nick; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter An alternative to filling would be to use a pump system, which is not an ideal solution either. I will discuss your project with the other reviewers and we will get back to you. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson [mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:45 AM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Crawford, Curt; Max Lissak Subject: FW: Lenora short plat letter Steve, One other contention would be this. In order to construct a sand filter, the entire parcel would have to be raised by four feet or so. I would contend that the environmental damage from the process of excavating the 10,000 or so tons of fill material, the 500 truck trips to the site, and the grader work on site, would be several orders of magnitude larger, and would be certain. I have been reluctant to make this contention earlier because it does not get to the core question. Dennis -----Original Message ----- From: Dennis Alfredson [mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:51 PM To: 'Foley, Steve' Cc: Max Lissak (mlissak@gmail.com); Curt Crawford (Curt.Crawford@kingcounty.gov); Kate Rhoads (Kate. Rhoads@kingcou nty.gov); Lanny Henoch (Ian ny.henoch@kingcounty.gov); Laura Casey (Laura.Casey@metrokc.gov); Nick Gillen (Nick.Gillen@Kingcounty.gov); Claire Jonson (Claire.Jonson@kingcounty.gov) Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Steve, 1. Several of the quoted sources declare that bogs receive moisture solely from precipitation, so the point could be argued. Nevertheless, I will not argue it just now. A situation where King County might argue that the bog treatment menu applies would be similar to a lakefront house, where the lake is not a lake but a bog. Runoff from the lawn would go directly into the bog - and not a lot of it at that. Not 360 acres. 2. What you are extrapolating to is that, even in a 100-year storm, a small portion of runoff is treated by virtue of going through a sand filter. I would rebut that the volume of stormwater from a low-frequency/high-intensity storm is clean, or certainly relatively clean. That is to say, for example, the runoff from a common winter rain, which travels across paved roadways, may have, let's say, 10 ppm of pollutants. The runoff from a 2-year storm (i.e., stronger than the design water quality storm) would have, say, 0.5 ppm of pollutants. 09/22/2008 YVI 3 SOC Page 2 of 4 � . To restate your contention, then, even if only flows from the high intensity storms inundate the bog, the bog would benefit by the sand filter treatment, even if the difference made in pollutant levels was miniscule. I would rebut that the aerobic, non -acidic nature of the stormwater would do far more harm to bog vegetation. And it is this contradiction that leads to the conclusion that the bog is not affected by this stormwater runoff. It is absolutely likely that the period during which the streamflow receives a lower level of treatment would coincide with the period of bog inundation. (I guess I'm not quite sure what you mean here.) Also, as an aside, since there must be an elevation difference between the north and south sides of the bog, it would be expected that precipitation falling on the bog would find its way to the south end, where it would pool if it could not escape due to the presence of streamflow at that elevation. You still have not addressed any of the points or definitions in the letter, or the attached documents. How, just for one example, can you square your position with the declaration by the UW person, whoever that was, that " bottom line - sphagnum bogs are isolated from the influences of groundwater and/or surface wafer runoff in some way"? Dennis -----Original Message ----- From: Foley, Steve[maiito:Steve. Foley@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 2:27 PM To: Dennis Alfredson Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Casey, Laura; Gillen, Nick; ]onson, Claire; Rhoads, Kate Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Dennis, responses to your points. 1. Not true, there are other bogs in KC that do receive surface runoff. If bogs didn't ever receive surface runoff, why do you suppose we have the bog treatment requirement in the manual? 2. The bog treatment requirement in the SWDM does not consider the frequency.of inundation, therefore your argument is irrelevant. Neither is your argument sound. The treatment threshold you refer to could result in reduced treatment for a certain portion of the flow from large runoff events. All flow from the event that occurs at a lower rate than the "design rate" would be treated, and a portion of the flow during the time that the rate was exceeded would be treated. A high flow bypass does not bypass all the flow, only that exceeding the design rate. It is unlikely that the period during which the flow from the site is receiving a somewhat lower level of treatment would coincide with the period that the bog is inundated. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson[mailto:dennis@platandsitedvildesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:59 AM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Casey, Laura; Gillen, Nick; ]onson, Claire; Rhoads, Kate Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Steve, You have not directly addressed any of the points and assertions raised in my fetter. To address yours: 1. The project cannot be draining "to" the bog, by the very definition. It may drain to points around the bog, near the bog, adjacent to the bog, but it cannot be draining "to" the bog. If it were, there would be no bog. 2. If indeed a portion of the bog was flooded, it could be, and l would assert must be, as a result of runoff 09/22/2008 Page 3 of 4 of higher -than -water -quality -design flow, and is therefore irrelevant. 3. See #1. Attached is an excerpt from a Power Point presentation made by the University of Washington. My impression is the County is using simultaneous fundamentally contradictory language and thought process. My suspicion is that another factor is that, because this requirement was made of another, downstream, plat a few years ago, the County has a reluctance to reverse now (if it was felt that was the proper course of action). I would appreciate knowing how much this is a factor - for real. I am also distressed that it seems no one at the County is willing to step up and acknowledge that we have a point - several points - here. Dennis -----Original Message ----- From: Foley, Steve [mailto:Steve.Foley@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:35 AM To: Dennis Alfredson Cc: Max Lissak, Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Gillen, Nick; Rhoads, Kate; Casey, Laura; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Sorry, I meant to include this document. From: Foley, Steve Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:34 AM To: 'Dennis Alfredson' Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Gillen, Nick; Rhoads, Kate; Casey, Laura; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Dennis, I have read the materials you sent and discussed this situation extensively with other KC staff. Here are the relevant facts: 1. if your project drains to a bog, the SWDM requires water quality treatment meeting the bog menu requirements, 2. the 1997 King County Bog Inventory documents a site visit on 10/30/97 where the wetland specialist saw "the southern portion of the bog was inundated with sheet flow, and. 3. your project drains to the stream leading to the bog. Therefore, the bog treatment standard is required. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson [mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:42 PM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak, Crawford, Curt Subject: Lenora short plat letter Steve, Please see attached letter. 09/22/2008 SOC Page 4 of 4 Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http:/Iwww.avg.corn Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1672 - Release Date: 9/17/2008 9:33 AM No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.2111676 - Release Date: 9/17/2008 9:33 AM 09/22/2008 SOC Page 1 of 1 Henoch, Lanny From: Foley, Steve Sent; Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:34 AM To: 'Dennis Alfredson' Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Gillen, Nick; Rhoads, Kate; Casey, Laura; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Dennis, I have read the materials you sent and discussed this situation extensively with other KC staff. Here are the relevant facts: 1. if your project drains to a bog, the SWDM requires water quality treatment meeting the bog menu requirements, 2. the 1997 King County Bog Inventory documents a site visit on 10/30/97 where the wetland specialist saw "the southern portion of the bog was inundated with sheet flow, and. 3. your project drains to the stream leading to the bog. Therefore, the bog treatment standard is required. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson[mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:42 PM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt Subject: Lenora short plat letter Steve, Please see attached letter. Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 09/22/2008 SOC Page 1 of 1 Henoch, Lanny From: Foley, Steve Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:35 AM To: 'Dennis Alfredson' Cc: 'Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Gillen, Nick; Rhoads, Kate; Casey, Laura; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Attachments: BogSC2001.pdf Sorry, l meant to include this document. From: Foley, Steve Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:34 AM To: 'Dennis Alfredson' Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt; Henoch, Lanny; Gillen, Nick; Rhoads, Kate; Casey, Laura; Jonson, Claire Subject: RE: Lenora short plat letter Dennis, I have read the materials you sent and discussed this situation extensively with other KC staff. Here are the relevant facts: 1. if your project drains to a bog, the SWDM requires water quality treatment meeting the bog menu requirements, 2. the 1997 King County Bog Inventory documents a site visit on 10/30/97 where the wetland specialist saw "the southern portion of the bog was inundated with sheet flow, and. 3. your project drains to the stream leading to the bog. Therefore, the bog treatment standard is required. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson[mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:42 PM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak; Crawford, Curt Subject: Lenora short plat letter Steve, Please see attached letter. Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 09/22/2008 �/dk���� \ ■ It WETLAND: Soos Creek 2 DOMINANT VEGETATION ADJACENT TO SPHAGNUM MAT: Trees: PSME, TSHE, PISI Shrubs: SPDO, SAsp, RHPU, RUPR Emergents: MAT: largely continuous with hummocks and hollows. GENERAL CONDITION OF SPHAGNUM; areas are lush,thick,healthy some areas only OIL. WATER TABLE. high, sphagnurrt watery or hollows between hummocks felled with water to the south, and low to the north, with hollows between hummocks; fairly dry without standing water. Water tea -stained. pH: 4.0 in hollows between hummocks 4.0 in sphagnum OBSERVED VEGETATION ON SPHAGNUM MAT: Trees: TSHE, PISI Shrubs: RHGR, SPDO, VAUL Herbs: Sedges/Rushes/Grasses/Ferns: CARO Mosses: SPsp GENERAL NOTES_ The labrador tea is very talland densely -growing. At the time of the site visit, the southern portion of the bog was inundated with sheet flow while the northern portion was above the flood water elevation. There is a little -used trail leading into the central area of the bog and associated small amounts of litter along it. • • SOC Henoch, Lanny Page 1 ofC�%/ Z--o7saa7� From: Foley, Steve Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:23 AM To: Henoch, Lanny; Rhoads, Kate; Jonson, Claire; Gillen, Nick Subject: FW: Lenora short plat letter Attachments: Lenora short plat bog letter.pdf; bog first batch.pdf; bog second batch.pdf; bog third batch.pdf FYI, more of the same. I will send him a brief reply and cc you. -- Steve From: Dennis Alfredson[mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com} Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:42 PM To: Foley, Steve Cc: Max Ussak; Crawford, Curt Subject: Lenora short plat letter Steve, Please see attached letter. Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 09/22/2008 =PLAT & SITE CIVIL DESIGN, LLC September 16,2008 Steve Foley King County Water and Land Resources Division steve.Fole,y@kingeounty.gov RE: Lenora Short Plat 6-lot short plat Parcel # 619660 0100 Dear Steve: I understand that, as it stands currently, King County will recommend to the City of Renton that the short plat application be denied, based on the lack of a sphagnum bog water treatment facility. I am told that if you can be persuaded of the lack of need for such a facility, the County would recommend approval. Consequently, I would ask you to consider: The very definition found in the Manual says, " ... bogs are isolated from surface water, being supplied almost solely by rainwater. " It is clearly inconsistentto suppose that the bog is being regularly overwhelmed by stormwater runoff from the upstream drainage basin, especially of this size (approximately 360 acres). An internet source of definition is more precise, "Bog is the common name for peat systems having the sphagnum association described, but this term applies strictly only to systems that receive water income from precipitation exclusively. " ■ Another internet source, "wetlands with a high cover of sphagnum, such as bogs, are by definition, elevated above the normal high water marls " Sphagnum bogs are characterized by acidic, anoxic (no oxygen), low nutrient waters. Quoting a King County source found on the internet, "In addition to a distinctive plant community, the water chemistry of sphagnum bogs is also unique. It is characterized by acidic waters (pH3 to S. S), low nutrient content, low alkalinity, and a buffering system composedpredominantlyof organic acids." Sphagnum moss is specially adapted for life in such waters. Stormwater runoff does not carry any of these characteristics. ■ The water quality design flow is either 60% of the 2-year peak flow rate (in the case of facilities preceding detention) or the full 2-year peak flow rate (facilities following detention). Restated, every single rainfall event, every drizzle, every shower, every 37702 28I1 SE Enumciaw,WA 98022 Tel (263) 334-6990 Fax (206)242-4209 empil dennisftistandsitecivildesign.com sprinkle, is to be treated, up to the water quality design flow rate. Which implies that it is expected that every single rainfall event (up the design flow rate) is expected to affect the bog. This simply cannot be the case, because if it were, the sphagnum bog vegetation would not be sphagnum bog vegetation. It would be common wetland vegetation. " It is inconsistent to expect that bog vegetation will be negatively affected by what pollutants a sand filter can remove, but not be negatively affected by the non -acidic, highly oxygenated, nutrient laden nature of the stormwater runoff. ■ Quoting another internet source, "It is typical of bogs that they have no significant inflows or outflows." Another internet source, "Stormwater runoff should not be diverted to sphagnum bogs." Stormwater runoff is not currently being diverted to the sphagnum bog, because if it were, the sphagnum bog would not exist. ■ Another source, the WSDOE Manual, classifies sphagnum moss as "Exotic plants that should not be introduced to existing, created, or constructed Puget Sound freshwater basins " Again, the contention is that this bog is not part of the freshwater basin — otherwise, it would not be a bog. Another source, "Most typical wetlandplants cannot survive in the nutrient poor, acidic environment, but a few species, such as .... sphagnum moss are especially adapted for life the bog. " • This site constitutes one acre of the 360 acres tributary to Soos Creek from upstream near the bog location. The volume of runoff from 360 acres is substantial. One of the Treatment Goals of the KCSWDM is to "maintain pH below 6." This is a goal unique to sphagnum bog treatment and is inconsistent with a treatment goal intended to promote the vitality of the other, more common, wetland plants, which of course constitute the bulk of the plant community. The implication is that the sphagnum bog menu is meant to apply to situation of another type than the situation here. ■ The WSDOE Stormwater Management Manual contains no comparable sphagnum bog treatment menu or requirements. We have never contended either that there is no bog, or that the bog may be flooded during high-intensityllow-frequency storms. The reason is, both questions are irrelevant. If there is a bog, so what? Runoff from this site, 3,000 feet away, cannot be affecting it by definition. If the bog is rarely, but occasionally, flooded, so what? The water quality design flow does not demand such flows be treated, and rightfully so. It seems that, 10 or so years ago, a King County biologist eyed the bog, eyed the nearby streamflow, and made a judgment that the bog could be inundated by the stream. Whether or not it could be inundated at all is debatable, but I would contend that it certainly cannot be inundated regularly (i.e., more often than 60% of the 2-year) by virtue of the evidence and definitions found above. This made judgment, on which this whole issue rests, should now be discarded in light of the arguments above. My hope is that you will find these points reasonable and compelling, and save us from the task of making our case to the City of Renton. ESIGN uric Cc: Curt Crawford attachments Estimatingthe Normal Nigh Water Mark Using the Northwestern Ontario Wetland Ecosystem Classification Table 1 (page 4) describes classes of wetlands and suggests their suitabil- ity for buffering aquatic habitats from the effects of forest management activities. It also relates those wetland classes to the ecological factors impor- tant for considering their value for buffering aquatic habitats. Other important considerations include: • repetitive flooding influences the wetland vegetation, making wetland plant communities a good indicator of normal high water activity; • water bodies bordered by open wetlands do not receive the shading benefits of trees further inshore than 20 to 30 metres; • wetlands with a high cover of sphagnum, such as bogs, are by definition, elevated above the normal high water mark,. organic material (peat) that provide both a buffering and filtration role; and, • many wetland types that have value for buffering waterbodies are readily interpreted from aerial photography. Determining the high water mark through the use of wetland ecosystem indicators is an objective way of assessing seasonally fluctuating hydrologi- cal conditions. Wetland plant communities and ecosystems often occur as part of a heterogeneous wetland complex including many community types. However, these complexes often occur in a predictable and ordered sequence from open water to "drier" wetland types. Determining the point at which the wetland complex provides adequate buffering potential from timber manage- ment activities will require training in the use of the wetland ecosystem classification, and skills in wetland plant identification. Discussion Riparian timber reserves Fulfil many roles. They provide shade and assist in regulating water temperature. They also contribute to the deposition of litter, insects, pollen and other organic material which become part of the food chain. Overland sediment and nutrient transport are primarily accomplished through the presence of undisturbed, permeable forest soils, a function that should also be provided by undisturbed shrub or heath ground cover, particu- larly since these are usually on very low slopes. Riparian reserves have more value than just protecting fish habitat and water quality (Pike and Racey 1989). Treed reserves are often rationalized on the basis of the fish habitat guidelines but are intended to provide habitat for other species and protection of aesthetic values, especially around tourism lakes. Wetlands are also important riparian habitats for both fish and terres- trial wildlife. Forest management planning must address wildlife habitat as part of a broad ecosystem based approach to management. NVVST TN-M9 Wildlife & Heritage Service - Coastal Plain Bogs in Maryland Page 1 of 7 Maaryylaannd Department of Notyroi_Resources: WWI ad Coastal Plain Bogs in Maryland When most people think of bogs, they think of huge quaking mats of sphagnum moss surrounded by evergreens in the far North ... or of the vast wet moors of northern Europe. Few Marylanders realize that we have a number of small bogs right here on our Coastal Plain. These unusual wetlands are important and threatened in our state. Bogs are open, acidic, nutrient-poorwetlandswith sphagnum moss, heath shrubs, wildflowers, and often with insect -eating plants. Bogs form when a mat of vegetation, especially sphagnum moss and sedges, develops on the edge of a pond, lake, wetlands, or slow -moving stream, and eventually grows over the surface of the water. As time passes, the dead, decaying plants form a dense, fibrous layer known as "peat." Living moss, sedges, and shrubs take root in the developing peat, holding it together and becoming part of it when they die. Lam- e'vaiop, thiy-115icome highly stressful environmentsfor most plants. The still or slow -moving water is very acidic and contains a lim' supply of nutrients, such as nitrogen, that are needed for plant growth. The partly decayed vegetation adds organic acids to the bog, slowing further decay and limiting the release of nutrients. If the peat layer is thick, it keeps water and nutrients from circulating freely. Most typical wetland plants cannot survive in the nutrient -poor, acidic environme , a few p i-fif pecies, 6— as cram emes, sunciews, and sperm moss, daily adapted for life in the bog. Most of Maryland's original Coastal Blain bogs are believed to have formed when fires removed woody vegetation and humus from certain swamps during periods of drought. When the water table returned to normal, the lack of woody vegetation allowed bog species to invade the wetland edges, where wet, sandy soils provided the appropriate conditions. Coastal Plain bogs may also have developed in some "oxbow" lakes (the section of a meandering stream cut off when the stream changed course) and in old beaver ponds. More than three centuriesof human activity, includingfire suppression, forest clearing, and the draining and filling of wetlandsfor agriculture and development, have radically altered the landscape of Maryland's Coastal Plain. These changes have destroyed many of Maryland's original Coastal Plain bogs and have confined most new bog formation to a few artificial sites that mimic the natural soil and water conditions required for bog formation. Maryland's few remaining Coastal Plain bogs harbor many species that are rare or endangered in the state, and these important habitats deserve our protection. A Walk Through a Coastal Plain Bog http://www.dnr.state.md.us/wildlife/bogs.htrnl 9I12/2408 5191 Hatch's Click Beetle Eanus hatchi Range: Lowland sphagnum bogs of northwest Washington (Johnson 1979). Washington Distribution: Historically known from Snohomish County and King County. Currently confirmed only in King County(Johnson 1984). Habitat Requirements: Hatch's click beetles inhabit eutrophic sphagnum bogs in or near lakes below 1,000m (3280'). They have been collected in very low, floating mats of vegetation in pure sphagnum bogs (Lane 1938). Larvae have been found near the bog margins, above the waterline (Lane 1971). Adults probably feed on honeydew, pollen, nectar, and small soft insects. Larvae probably are plant and small insect predators (Johnson, pers. comm.). Limiting Factors: Unknown. Managements Recommendations: Prevent all activities that might alter the condition of sphagnum bogs where Hatch's click beetles occur. These include peat mining, filling, draining, construction within the bogs, and other activities. Changing the natural water level or flow rate within the bogs should also be prevented. Insecticides, and herbicides that could damage wetland vegetation, should not be applied in sphagnum bogs. Persons wanting to apply chemicals to adjoining lands should rmota na ifsto nd drift will ca the chemicals into the b . Stormwater runoff should not be diverted into sphagnum og . Decisions a emF a sis and should consider type of chemical used, season, topography and other relevant features. Exotic fish could potentially prey upon beetle larvae and should not be introduced into wetlands occupied by Hatch's click beetles. References: Comstock, J.H. 1960. An introduction to entomology. Comstock Publishing Ass., New York, NY. Lane, M.C. 1971. In: M.H. Hatch, The beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. of Washington Publications in Biology 16:28-29. Ribes species (currants) Sphagnum species (sphagnum mosses) Rho&,den ro groen u r tea) Vaccinium oxycoccos (hog cranberry) %almia microphylla, ssp. occidentalis (bog laurel) tic plants that should Hedera helix (English ivy) ce, lip Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) constructed Puget Sound Basin freshwater Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) wetlands Iris pseudacorus (yellow iris) llex aqufolia (holly) Impatiens glandul ifera (policeman's helmet) Lotus corniculatus (birdsfoot trefoil) Lysimachiathyrs#lora(tufted loosestrife) Wiophyllum species (water milfoil, parrot's feather) Polygonum cuspMWtum (Japanese knotweed) Polygonum sachalineme (giant knotweed) Rtebus discolor (Himalayan blackberry) Tanacetum vulgare (common tansy) Native plants that A Wd Potentilla palusOls (Pacific silverweed) not be introduced to existing, created, or Solarum dulcimara (bittersweetnightshade) constructed Puget sound Basin freshwater Jz mcus effiaw (soft rush) wetlands Comummaculaim (poison hemlock) Ramo ulus repens (creeping buttercup) February2005 Volume 1— Minimum Technical Requirements D-29 Pretreatment The removal of material such as solids, grit, grease, and scum froin flows prior to physical, biological, or physical treatment processes to improve treatability. Pretreatment may include screening, grit removal, settling, oiUwater separation, or application of a Basic Treatment BW prior to infiltration. Priority peat systems Unique, irreplaceable fens that can exhibit water pH in a wide range from highly acidic to alkaline, including fens typified by Sphagnum species, Ledurn groenlandiown (Labrador tea), Drosera rotundifolia (sundew), and Vg2OW:MM oxvcoccos (bog cranberry); marl fens; estuarine peat deposits; and other moss peat systems with relatively diverse beci flora and £anna� Bob g e common name for peat systems having the Sphagnum association described, but this to applies strictly oat to s stems that reeeive water income from Professional civil A peeper glistered with the state of Washington as a professional. engineer engineer in civil engineering. Project Any proposed action to alter or develop a site. The proposed action of a permit application or an approval, which requires drainage review. Project site That portion of a property, properties, or right of way subject to land disturbing activities, new impervious surfaces, or replaced impervious surfaces. Properly Functioning Equivalent to engineered soil/landscape system. This can also be a Soil System (PFSS) natural system that has not been disturbed or modified. Puget Sound basin Puget Sound south of Admiralty Inlet (including Hood Canal and Saratoga Passage); the waters north to the Canadian border, including portions of the Strait of Georgia; the Strait of Juan de Fuca south of the Canadian border; and all the lands draining into these waters as mapped in Water Resources inventory Areas numbers 1 through 19, set forth in WAC 173-500-040. RID See Retention/detention facility. Rare, threatened, or Plant or animal species that are regional relatively uncommon, are endangered species nearing endangered status, or whose existence is in immediate jeopardy and is usually restricted to highly specific habitats. Threatened and endangered species are officially listed by federal and state authorities, whereas rare species are unofficial species of concernthat fit the above definitions. Rational method A means of computing storm drainage flow rates (Q) by use of the formula Q = CIA, where C is a coefficient describing the physical drainage area, I is the rainfall intensity and A is the area. This method is no longer used in the technical manual. February2005 Volume 1— Minimum Technical Requirements GlossaW7 Bog Bogs Peat Sphagnum Moss Cent Fuel Ireland Plants England ECONOMIC Index -A BCD EFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY2. I-LoMe a Bog A bog ;s a �",!Ip i tyr}e.that atpS would be proper to Call tll4 sphXMlt bogs if the peat is comprised mostly of al component of peat in the f4 north. It is typical of bogs that they stave nn significant reason bog waters are aicidl Page 1 of 1 About Us Contact Us Terms Privacy Search: 6ns Business Industries Finance Tax First Prev [ 1 21 Next Last is:not entirely redundant, afthocu b it inu spp_.j. l_,Khons are a principal Ided by precipitatim and for this Bogs are Mdety distributed in cold. temperate dirnates, inos ir', the northem hemisphere ( BoMal , The wodd% largest wetlands :are we bogs of #* Wastem Sipprian Lowiands in RU" which cover more than 8Q0,000.,jW_t .kI)W.QtrV% Sphagnum togs were widespread In northern Europe. tykiwct was more than 15 percent bog: AchllUstand off Irelarta is 87 percent bog. There are extensive bogs In CgWjl (called mus egs). Scotland and 00 and. There are also bogs in the Falkland Islands. Thereexist other terns for what are bogs or peal wetlands similar to bogs The tern moor refers to a flat, boggy area YAh patches of heath and peat moss (that is, a bog) An example of this wetland type is this vast expanse of moorland in southwest FngIoN, partrnopr 1 Bog habitats Bogs are chatienging environments for plant life because they are low In nutrients and very acidic. Ca [yprQusj*Ats have adapted to these conditions by using insggs as a nutrient source. The high acidity of togs and the absorption of water by sphagnum moss reduce the amount ofwater available for plants Some bog plants, such as Leathedeaf, have waxy leaves to help retain moisture. Bogs also offer a unique environment for animals. For instance. English bogs give a tome to the boghopper beetle and a yellow fly tatted the hairy canary. Some bogs have preserved ancient oats logs useful in Qandrochronology and they have yielded extremely well-preserved bl&Dodleg, with organs, skin and hair Intact, such as Tollund Man and Lindow man, buried there thousands of years ago after apparent Celtic human sacrifice. politics Business Finance s� Topics. Bog Bogs Peat Sphagnum Moss Cent Fuel Ireland Plants England... Bogle Boggart Boggle Bogosort la Bogue.Kansas Bogalusa, Louisiana Bogus BrookTownshlp. Minnesota Bogard, Missouri Bogota, New Jersey Bogue. North Carolina Boger City. North Carolina Boggs Township, Armstrong County. Pennsylvania Boggs Township, Centre County, Pennsylvania a Bookmark i Set As Homepage a Print ?Top Fri Sep 12 03:12:22 2008 EconomicExpert-m This article is Gom "pedia licensed.,*-r the Gt!r1.4Frea DQtprtwMirtiPn tries .V_ It uses mataial Prom the W ikipodia lr 1i51e„",I jv' 13ie listofall authors ss availableimder this link. The article can be eMted hm. hnp://www.economieexpert.com/a/Bog-htm 9/12/2008 k�g King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 STY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov September 17, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC 37702 — 280'h Place Southeast Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Ayplication for the Lenora Short Plla File No. L07SO079 Dear Mr. Alfredson: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your September 16, 2008 e-mail correspondence, requesting an extension of the deadline for the submittal of additional information required to process the above -noted application. When supplemental information is required, King County Code 20.20.100A1a allows the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) to set a reasonable deadline for the submittal of such information. Failure to meet this deadline may be cause for the application to be canceled. The request for additional information stops all processing of the short plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements in the short plat application process. Our February 13, 2008 letter provided a deadline of April 14, 2008 for the submittal of the required information. Subsequently, in response to your requests, we granted extensions to this deadline to July 31, 2008, and then to September 17, 2008. While submittals have been made to address some of the issues identified in our February 13t' letter, not all of the items have been addressed. Per your September 161h e-mail, we are now granting an additional two week extension as you have requested. Please provide your response and the requested information by September 30, 2008, to address the following subjects indicated in the attachment to our February 13, 2008 letter: Wetland, Recreation Tract, 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and KCC 19A, Site Plan. If you have any questions re ding this matter, please contact me at (206) 296-6632. Sincerely,/ '1011 Lanny Knoch, PPM III Current Planning Section, LUSD cc: Fereshteh Dehkordi, PPM II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist, Critical Areas Review Section, LUSD Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD SOC Page 1 of 1 Henoch, Lanny From: Dennis Alfredson(dennis@piatandsitecivildesign.com) Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:43 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Cc: Max Lissak Subject: Lenora Short Plat L07S0079 Lanny, We hereby request an extension of the deadline to resubmit from September 17 to September 30. 1 am writing to Steve Foley to ask him to reconsider the County's position on the sphagnum bog treatment issue, and he probably needs time to respond. Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 09/17/2008 l soc Page 1 of 1 Henoch, Lanny From: Dennis Alfredson [dennis@platandsitecivildesign,com] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:10 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: FW: Sorry, wrong letter ... Attachments: AOA 3753 bog letter.pdf -----Original Message ----- From: Gillen, Nick[mailto:Nick.Giilen@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:00 AM To: Dennis Alfredson; Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak; Henoch, Lanny Subject: RE: Sorry, wrong letter ... Dennis, As an FYI to ensure submittals get to the main plat file all submittals, at some point, should go to the planner (Lanny Henoch). Lanny will need several copies so check with him before you submit any thing. thanks N .... ........ From: Dennis Alfredson [mailto:dennis@platandsitecivildesign.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 2:29 PM To: Gillen, Nick; Foley, Steve Cc: Max Lissak Subject: Sorry, wrong letter ... Dennis Alfredson, P.E. Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC (253) 334-6990 09/09/2008 �AOAAltmann Oliver Associates, LL( l' 11111�{{lillll'I!'s.'i ➢E 44 September 3, 2008 AOA-3753 Dennis Alfredson Plat & Site Civil Design LLC 37702 280th PI. SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 SUBJECT: Lenora Short Plat, King County File No. L07S0079 Dear Dennis: As you know, King County is requiring that the subject project utilize the sphagnum bog protection standards of the 2005 KCSWDM since stormwater from the project will eventually enter Soos Creek 2, a large downstream wetland with a mapped bog component_ As outlined in a July 23, 2008 e-mail from Kate Rhoads, the bog standards would not apply if "a qualified wetland biologist identifies that either 9 ) stream flows through the wetland are in a confined channel and would not come into contact with the bog portion of the wetland or 2) there is no bog, and DDES confirms their findings". On August 29, 2008 1 conducted a reconnaissance of the Soos Creek 2 wetland located downstream of the subject property to review the requirements outlined by Kate Rhoads. During the reconnaissance, the wetland was traversed from west to east through the mapped bog portion of the wetland. The bog component was positively identified and the mapped boundaries of the bog appeared to reasonably match the field conditions. The eastern edge of the bog was fairly well defined and there was a clear break between the bog vegetation (primarily Labrador tea and bracken fern) and the mostly willow swamp located further to the east. After leaving the bog component, the elevation dropped what appeared to be several feet before shallow ponding was encountered within the willow swamp_ Based on this field observation, the bog component is perched above the main body of the wetland. The main body of the wetland was then walked to the power line corridor located in the northeastern portion of the wetland. Although shallow ponding was observed Dennis Alfredson September 3, 2008 Page 2 throughout this portion of the wetland, no confined channel or noticeably flowing water was encountered. Based on the reconnaissance, it appears that runoff entering the wetland disperses throughout the willow -dominated plant community. Due to the perched condition of the bog component it appears likely that any potential surface overflow into the bog would only occur during high -flow precipitation events. Since it is my understanding that low-frequency/high volume flows are not treated as part of the bog protection standards, it appears that application of the bog protection standards for the subject project would provide little or no benefit to the bog component. If you have any questions regarding the reconnaissance, please give me a call. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC L Djrl__� John Altmann Ecologist Altmann Oliver Associates, LLG 11A0A N)I;cry5'iR <':IIIG1IJ'!eI,iiV,\ ,ZrjII (Wi(.: i 42'-> '-°i:3-1:�:;'� 1-:..\tI-:;;i:;+•I,'s+i!5 I EliVlE'oI1 nelltal Mannino: & �.411tC�54„�.113(.' September 2, 2008 AOA-3752 Max Lissak Lenora Apartments 11121 N E 43" Street Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Wetland Reconnaissance for Lenora Short Plat 17802 — 116t" Ave. SE, King County File No. L07SO079 Dear Max: On August 12, 2008 1 conducted a wetland reconnaissance on the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. As apparent through historical aerial photos, nearly the entire site has been previously developed for residential use. However, at the time of the field investigation the site was undeveloped and consisted of a relatively flat weedy field. Although no wetlands were identified on the site during the reconnaissance, a potential wetland was observed off -site to the northeast. On August 21, 2008 a site meeting was conducted with Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist with the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES). The primary purpose of the site meeting was to confirm the lack of wetlands on the highly disturbed property, as well as to review the potential for wetlands located off -site to the northeast. On -site Review Vegetation on the site at the time of the field investigations was generally indicative of highly disturbed environments and included a mix of reed canarygrass (Phalarrs arundinacea), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare), tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), common plantain (Plantago major), red clover (Trifolium pretense), hedge bindweed (Convolvulus sepium), birds -foot trefoil (Lotus comieulatus), and Himalayan blackberry (Rebus discolor). No definitive hydrophytic plant communities were observed. Borings taken throughout the site revealed dry, high chroma, non-hydric, highly disturbed soil profiles that were often compacted. Based on the site meeting with Nick Gillen, it is my understanding that the County concurs with the "no wetland" determination for the property. Max Lissak September 2, 2008 Page 2 Off -site Review During the initial wetland reconnaissance and subsequent County site meeting, a small swale was observed within the pasture along the north property line. Although dry at the time of the field investigations, this swale appears to periodically convey runoff from the development to the northwest toward an undeveloped area located off -site to the northeast. Photo -documentation from a DDES field technician taken in January of 2008 revealed shallow ponding in a portion of the Swale as well as additional ponding adjacent a residence located further off -site to the northeast. However, four soil test pits dug through the swale and along the edge of the property boundary (Attachment A and Figure 1) revealed non-hydric soils. Furthermore, vegetation within the pasture contained a mix of hydrophytic and more mesic plant species that are generally typical of disturbed pastures and are often found in both uplands and wetlands. Therefore, based on the observations made during the August 2008 field investigations and the limited off -site access, it appears that any standing water in the swale does not persist long enough into the growing season for the formation of hydric soils to occur and the swale area was not delineated as a wetland. The ponding located further off -site to the northeast that was documented by the DDES technician in January of 2008 likely meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland. Although the off -site area was not fully accessed due to trespass concerns, the likely wetland was estimated at about 75 feet from the property line. Due to the likely relatively small size and disturbed condition of the presumed wetland, it is anticipated that the wetland would not be rated any higher than a Category III. Since Category III wetlands within the urban growth area require a standard 75-foot buffer, based on the assumptions made the buffer would not encroach into the subject property. If you have any questions regarding the reconnaissance, please give me a call. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment I 4 t0 V J ti ti.. r+r 7Z 11 ui ATTACHMENT A DATA SHEETS _ DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATiON MECHCd1 Field Investigator(s): P` vq- _ bate: Proi8CvSila:-L 6iz ,:t°i F, County: 1G i W Appocant/Owner. S Plant Community #/Narne: Hole: la more datailed site description is necassary, use the bads of data form or a rald nolabook.. -- -- - F. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - `- -- - - - - - - - --- - ---•� r. -...-- --� Oo norfnal anvimnmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes 7C No (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, sails, and/or hydrology been significantly -disturbed? Yes No_� (If yes, explain on back) - --,-------_---------------------------------------- ---- - - VEGETATION . Indicalcr Indicator Dominant Plant Speclas Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Sialus Stratum I. fko W 11. 3. 13. ' ,fs �C r w� o— _ _�_ 14. . • 8. t t3. Aercant of dominant spedas that ate OEL.FACW, and/or FAC mud' Is the hydrdphytic vegetatlan crledon mail Yes No tc Rationale: _ 5n°7 6k C - SOILS ti 5eriasJphasa: Subgroup:2.. _ - 'Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ' Na Undatarminad Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No ;X HWic epipedon present? Yes No x is the soli: Mottled? Yes No X Glayed? Yes No k Matrix Color: I Gy& 313 _ - Motile Colors: Other hydric soil Indicators: Is iha hydrk: sal criterion mat? Yes Nq. X _ Rationale: HtaK ctkrww-A HYDROLOGY Is the grotirid surface f6undated? Yes No X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: Ust other. field evfdance of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the welland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X Ratlonale: ble ov- f4ty-,,460 tAfs oiL Soy So-si,, liud JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a w4iland? Yes. 'No F;alionala fortrisdiciional decision: t Ole data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procadura. Classificatlon according to -Soil Taxonomy.* D-2 _ DATA FARM [ ! 4�2 ROUTINE: ON5ITE DETERMINAT ON METHOD Field Investigator{s} �.+-Lh�a Dais: _$_ �Z� 'c$ Project/S+ta:...�—�r'A4 A -r _ Caunty: I&%jJLq Appficant/Owner: t_i SSA Plant Community g/Nams: Mole: lira more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data farm or a bald nolabook. r.- -- - T -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Oo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes. "C No (If no, explain on bads) Has the vagalatlon, sculs, andlor hydrology been signifiranlly dtslurbed? Yes MoC (If yes, explain an bads) r�r►iu�bK vC(, wrA t u� to O��7 T`���� tics �y--------------------------------------------------- VEGETAT10N . Indicaldr Indkaator DominaAt Plant Species Slatus Stratum Dominant Plant Species Slatus Stratum 1. "�cr',s'�r..►;�,r.tctc _ � l.� 11. 1 l.r • 3. ,%V- v u s S t 1 `1 13. 15. B. is, 7. -17. — 9. 18. 9. 19.- 1fl_ 20. _ Percent of dominant spades that are of I_, FACW, andfor FAG 1 5 o Is the hydrdphytic vegetation cri'larion met? Yes �c No Rationale: " SOILS ' ` Sarieslph as e : Subgroup,? -Is the ;all on the hydric sails list? Yes ' No Undetarrriined is the soil a Histasol? Yes No .A Kistic epipadon present? Yes No x Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No 7e Glayed? Yes No A )4atrfx Color. Mottle calars. Other hydric sail Ind€calors: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Rationale, C vvf"L�—& &r- Z W I T ska�!T U`i yrTl 5 HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface ihundaled? Yes No Surface water depth; . Is the soil saturaloil? Yes No c Depth to free-standing water In pit/soil probe We: List othat. lield ev€dance of surface inundalian or sail saturation. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No 7C. Fiatlonala No 06,rl:t-.A"r"4r= 69- 6vt1P1:r<<t:. 41F- %)AdL6f46Eb S61L. S,4TUAPOT1,43 n!L JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIpNALF Is lha plant community a wetland? Yes Na Y 13atf6na1e for'jurisdictional decision: ESLt.-S C.4,t'C61LwA1 P,ej-r tin r 101s data form canbe used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and tha Plant Community Assessment Procedure. 2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.' B -� _ DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOW /=told lnvastsgator(s}; �'�"t �� Date: Pro ect/Sila: '�,.so h_ ► TI -S - -- "A 1 51a1e:,—.�— County, le-rJ G I1can[/Owrsar: t-t 5 f A k APP -- — Plant Community #/Name; Nofg: Hra more delailed site description is necessary, use the back of data farm or a field notebook. _ r r — Do normal em ironmenlai conditions exist at the plant community? — — _ — _ _ ^ + _ ' .. Yes, X 146 (if no, explain an back) Has tha vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been si nlficantly disturbed? Yes „ C - No (If yes, explain on back) •t{j p,^tc- G aA�1 iri Co -- r� ��1`:-0 4ti~��.r7t< <k� ; VEGETATION Indicator indicator ' Dominant P'fanl Species Status Siralum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 13, a�• Co r w� s� r..w, NL- VI— •14. Y� 7_ 17. 20. Percent of dominant species that ate OEt_. FAGW, and/or FAG t Is the hydrdphytic vagetatlon criterion mail Yes No _mac Rallanale- SOILS Saries/phass: _ Subgroup;.2 As the soil an the hydric soils fist? Yes ' ` Na Undateriiiined Is the soil a Hislosol? Yes _ No : X Histic epipedon pros. ant? Yes No X Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No k Gteyed? Yes NoIc _ Taub Color, I o`r 0- 3 Motile Colors: Other hydric soil Indtcalars: fs the hydric soil critarion met? Yes Na,..� I�atfonafe: _ ' HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth: Is the soli saturated? Yes No )C iDepth to free-standing water In pit/soll probe hole: List other. field evidence of surface tnurndattan or soil saturation. Is the waliand hydrology criterion mat? Ye-s Na X - Aallonaia: No o SFL,,A T* aa- v'--%j G. f aF uui-46Sb k Scs4l, 5A�i1ft ► i ►urJ JURISDICTiONAl. DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE [sibs plant community a wetland? Yes. 'No X. F3atfonale for'Jurisdicilonal dacision: le _M� �rl�l�4f'LJr N^SLi _ I-"h!s data form can be used for the Hydric Sol Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procedure. 2 Classification according to "Solt Taxonomy,* B -2 DATA FORM -' ROUTINE ONSITE DETEFtMINAT]ON METHODI P 1 - Field Investigaiar(s): AL7T A,4,3• Date: - 1t-oV projecusaa: �- ��' 4T Slate: County: Y-19 V ,4ppGcantlC?wnar: �-{ s AA Plant Community #/Narna: _ Note: ff,a more detailed site dascnpilon is necessary, use the back of data farm or a field notebook- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- Qo norfrtaf environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes- K Na (If no, explain on back) Has the vegeladon, soils, and/or hydrology bean significantly disturbed? Yes No k (If yes, explain on back) VEGETATION . Indicator lndica[or Dominant Plant Species Status _ Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1. 1 r►.� 5 i PAC 2- R��u di5r61or F CU S 12. 3. 13. 44. 14. 1s. fi. 16. 7. - - - _ __ 17. ' t3. 1 t3 • . - --� 1q. $o. _ Percent of dominant species that ate OEL. FACW, andfor F'AC 90.910 Is the hydrephytic vegalation criterion m,et7 Yes No X Rationale: SOILS .-Subgroup;2 - - 'Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ' No Undetermined Is the soil a Hisiosal? Yes No : X Nlstic epipadon present? Yes No X Is the soil: Mauled? Yes Na X Gleyad? Yes N ❑ — Matroc Cofer. 7 s7W - Matila Colors: Other hydric soil Indicators:Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Nq,. , Aatlonale C b fi? u m HYDROLOGY is the grourid surfaca iriundated7 Yes No X Surface water depth; Is the soil saturated? Yes No_x_ Depth to free-standing water In pit/sail probe hole:--- Llst other. Ile Id evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the wetland hydrok4y criterion met? Yes No c _ Aatfonafe; gt- 4tr,S*vPT1-t nfi- EQIDee&C!- Sp.i-jR-A-ILtrrl JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINAT1CN AND RA710NALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes 'No Fjalionala for'jurlsdictional decision: t Thls data form can be used for the Hydric Sor? Assessment Procedure and the plant Community Assessment Proc.adure. 2 Class$Ication according to "Soil Taxonomy.' E -2 Dehkordi, Fereshteh From: Gillen, Nick Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:46 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: L07SO079 Fereshteh, I met on -site today with the applicant's biologist (John Altman). He will be completing a special study. It appears from our walk through that the ponded areas observed on site in January by Beth are not wetland areas, however the report will confirm the site walk. There is a potential wetland off site to the north. It appeared to be 80 plus feet from the site, again this will be confirmed in the report. Nick a King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov July 17, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil Design, LLC 37702 280`r' Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Application for the Preliminary Lissak Short Plat DDES File No. L07SO079 Dear Mr. Alfredson: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process your client's preliminary short plat application. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The May 8, 2008 letter provided a deadline of July 31, 2008 for the submittal of the requested information. We are granting a final extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division of DDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by September 17, 2008, your application may be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, - �--- I I,- � - �\ 4%Q A - - - r- Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager. Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Extension Itr Page 1 of 1 413/2007 1 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TfY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov May 22, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil design, LLC 37702 280`h Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies KC Fite L07SO079 Date of Complete Application: January 15, 2008 Lenora Short Plat Dear Mr. Alfredson: Attached, please find a copy of the approved road variance for Lenora short plat. A copy of confirmation of this variance from the City of Renton is also attached. Please address the remaining issues listed in our February 13, 2008 letter. Please submit the additional information by July 22, 2008. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Attachments Cc: Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review w/enc Main File Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision -----Original message ----- From: Kayren Kittrick(mailto:Kkittrick@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:42 PM To: Sanders, Jim Subject: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision Dear Mr. Sanders: Regarding Lenora Short Subdivision (L07SO079 and L08V0016) The City of Renton agrees with the recommendations from staff and approves the variance as written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kayren K. Kittrick Development Eng. Supervisor Permits & Inspections Development Services Division (425) 430-7299 1 a King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov May 12, 2008 Jennifer Toth Henning, AiCP Planning Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Road Variance Recommendation to the City of Renton Lenora Short Subdivision (Files L07SO079 and L08V0016) Dear Ms. Henning: King County is currently reviewing the Lenora preliminary short plat application pursuant to terms of the interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County. The project site is located in an area recently annexed by the City of Renton. During our review of the subdivision, the applicant submitted the enclosed road variance application regarding intersection spacing along 116d' Ave SE. To continue our review of the preliminary short plat, a decision by the City of Renton is required for the road variance application. The following summary provides a description of the site issues and a recommendation for the road variance. Findinf?s: 1. The proposed short plat is located on the east side of 116'h Ave SE which is classified by King County as an urban minor arterial street. As outlined in the 2007 King County Road Standards, this arterial classification requires 500 feet of spacing between intersections. 2. Road access for the subdivision is proposed as a private tract serving 6 lots. The new private road entrance is located on the east side of 116`h Ave SE and is approximately 197 feet north of the existing intersection at 178"' Place SE. Driveway access to the lots will be restricted to. Road A without having direct driveway access to the arterial street: The private road entrance will be designed with a driveway cut along the curb rather than using curb radius. This type of entrance design will better define the roadway entry as private and reduce the number of public road intersections along 1160i Ave SE. 3. The Lenora short plat has adequate vehicular sight distance along I I6 h Ave SE and the road frontage for the short plat will be improved to the urban arterial standards. 4. Evaluation of the site access has not identified any specific traffic hazards and the new road entrance is not expected to create problems with vehicular turning movements. Jennifer Toth Henning May 12, 2008 Page 2 Recommendation: King County recommends approval of the variance application for reduced intersection spacing. The proposed road entrance provides 197 feet of spacing from the nearest intersection at 178`" Place SE. Traffic safety issues have not been identified during our review of the short plat. The enclosed variance application includes a site plan and parcel mapping prepared by the applicant. The applicant did not provide a specific traffic analysis or evaluation of site access for the project. If the City of Renton determines the road designs are consistent with Renton regulations and/or design policies, the County recommends approval of the road variance. If you have questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 296- 7178 or via email at jim.sanders(a)kinacounty.gov. incer y, es H. Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Enclosure: Road Variance File L08VO016 cc: Peter Dye Fereshteh Dehkordi Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision -----Original Message----- From: Kayren Kittrick[mailto:Kkittrick@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:42 PM To: Sanders, Jim Subject: Road Variance Recommendation - Lenora Short Subdivision Dear Mr. Sanders: Regarding Lenora Short Subdivision (L07SO079 and L08V0016) The City of Renton agrees with the recommendations from staff and approves the variance as written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kayren K. Kittrick Development Eng. Supervisor Permits & Inspections Development Services Division (425) 430-7299 Xk -F is t/ L19 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 4akesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov May 12, 2008 Jennifer Toth Henning, AICP Planning Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Road Variance Recommendation to the City of Renton Lenora Short Subdivision (Files L07SO079 and L08V0016) Dear Ms. Henning: King County is currently reviewing the Lenora preliminary short plat application pursuant to terms of the interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County. The project site is located in an area recently annexed by the City of Renton. During our review of the subdivision, the applicant submitted the enclosed road variance application regarding intersection spacing along 116th Ave SE. To continue our review of the preliminary short plat, a decision by the City of Renton is required for the road variance application. The following summary provides a description of the site issues and a recommendation for the road variance. Findings: I. The proposed short plat is located on the east side of 116t' Ave SE which is classified by King County as an urban minor arterial street. As outlined in the 2007 King County Road Standards, this arterial classification requires 500 feet of spacing between intersections. 2. Road access for the subdivision is proposed as a private tract serving 6 lots. The new private road entrance is located on the east side of 116`h Ave SE and is approximately 197 feet north of the existing intersection at 178a` Place SE. Driveway access to the lots will be restricted to Road A without having direct driveway access to the arterial street. The private road entrance will be designed with a driveway cut along the curb rather than using curb radius. This type of entrance design will better define the roadway entry as private and reduce the number of public road intersections along 116t' Ave SE. 3. The Lenora short plat has adequate vehicular sight distance along 116 h Ave SE and the road frontage for the short plat will be improved to the urban arterial standards. 4. Evaluation of the site access has not identified any specific traffic hazards and the new road entrance is not expected to create problems with vehicular turning movements. Jennifer Toth Henning May 12, 2008 Page 2 Recommendation: King County recommends approval of the variance application for reduced intersection spacing. The proposed road entrance provides 197 feet of spacing from the nearest intersection at 178' Place SE. Traffic safety issues have not been identified during our review of the short plat. The enclosed variance application includes a site plan and parcel mapping prepared by the applicant. The applicant did not provide a specific traffic analysis or evaluation of site access for the project. If the City of Renton determines the road designs are consistent with Renton regulations and/or design policies, the County recommends approval of the road variance. If you have questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 296- 7178 or via email at jim.sanders(aftin county.gov. incer y, es H. Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Enclosure: Road Variance File L08VO016 cc: Peter Dye Fereshteh Dehkordi a King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov May 8, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil design, LLC 37702 280t" Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Application for the Preliminary Lenora Short Plat DDES File No. L07SO079 Dear Mr. Alfredson: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process the preliminary short plat application referenced above. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The road variance request associated with this short plat KC File L08V0016 is under review by the King County Department of Transportation. For any questions regarding the road variance application, please contact Craig Comfort at 206 263-6109, If you wish the remaining items on our letter dated February 13, 2008 can be submitted once a decision on the road variance is made. Therefore I am extending the deadline for submittal of the additional information to July 3.1, 2008. If the Land Use Services Division of DDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by this date, your application may be canceled or denied. You may request an extension of this deadline in writing. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division L07SO079 Page 1 of 1 May 8, 2008 a King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdafe Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov May 1, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil design, LLC 37702 280`h Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies KC File L07SO079 Date of Complete Application: January 15, 2008 Lenora Short Plat Dear Mr. Alfredson: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that we have not received the additional information we requested in our February 23, 2008 letter. This letter gave you a deadline of April 14, 2008. If you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may request an extension by May 9, 2008. Failure to respond shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division CC. Max Lissak, Applicant Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist, Critical Area Review Application File LIM King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Qakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov February 13, 2008 Dennis Alfredson Plat and Site Civil design, LLC 37702 280`h Place SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies, KC File L07S0079 Date Filed: November 5, 2007 Lenora Short Plat Date of Complete Application: January 15, 2008 Dear Mr. Mr. Alfredson: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to Ordinance 12196 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your client's project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter which lists how each item was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit it at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application, The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is April 14, 2008. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Enclosures cc: Max Lissak, Applicant w/enc Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w/enc Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist, Critical Area Review, w/enc Application File -i„ort Plat Screening Transmitta, King County LUSD File No. L07SO079 Date of Information Request: February 13, 2007 King County Department of Development Deadline for Submittal of Information: April 14, 2008 and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Wetland A portion of the site along its north boundary appears to have wetland characteristics. Please have this area of the site evaluated by a certified wetland biologist for presence of wetland or stream. If wetland and or stream is present on the site, then the area must be classified per King County Code 21A.24 and delineated with an appropriate setback as a Critical Area Tract (CAT) on the site plan. The critical area boundaries must be flagged on the site. A Critical Area Report must also be prepared and submitted for review by DDES. For any questions regarding the Critical Area standards, please contact Nick Gillen at (206) 296-7141. Recreation Tract King County Code (KCC 21A. 14.190) requires that 390 square feet of recreation space per lot be provided in a subdivision of more than four lots. The proposed recreation tract meets the size requirements of the code however it must also meet the following standards, where emphasis is added in bold: + Be of a grade and surface suitable for recreation improvements with a maximum grade of five percent; + Be on the site of the proposed development; + Be located in an area where the topography, soil, hydrology and other physical characteristics are of such quality as to create a flat, dry, obstacle -free space in a configuration which allows for passive and active recreation; • Be centrally located with good visibility of the site from roads and sidewalks; • Have no dimensions less than thirty feet, (except trail segments); • Be located in one designated area, unless the director determines that residents of large subdivisions, townhomes and apartment developments would be better served by multiple areas developed with recreation or play facilities; • Have a street roadway or parking area frontage along ten percent or more of the recreation space perimeter, except trail segments, if the required outdoor recreation space exceeds five thousand square feet and is located in a single detached or townhouse subdivision; • Be accessible and convenient to all residents within the development; and • Be located adjacent to and be accessible by trail or walkway to any existing or planned municipal, county, or regional park, public open space or trail system, which may be located on adjoining property The proposed recreation tract does not meet the required size and configuration requirements of the code. Please revise the site plan to show a suitable recreation tract in accordance with the above mentioned criteria. Additionally, a conceptual recreation tract plan shall be submitted to show the finished grade, landscaped area and other improvements. In reconfiguring the recreation tract all above criteria must be considered. .scr LF/P1atSCR.Sub 2/24/98 cic 2007 King County Road Standards (KCRS} 1161h Avenue SE is designated as a Minor Arterial. KCRS, Section 2.10.13 requires 500 feet of intersection spacing for a Minor Arterial road. The spacing between the proposed road and the intersection of SE 178"' Street appears to be less than 500 feet. The proposal must be revised to comply with the code requirement or a road variance request must be approved. Please revise the site plan to show this. 2. The right-of-way line and curb radii are not shown at the intersection of the proposed road A with 116th Avenue SE. KCRS Section 2.10 requires a 35' minimum curb radius and a 25' minimum right-of-way line radius. 2005 Kine County Surface Water Design Manual SWDM 1. The conceptual drainage plan must be prepared, stamped and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington. Please revise the conceptual drainage plan to comply with this requirement. 2. Our field observation for this proposal and other projects in the area indicates that Soos Creek flows through a sphagnum bog less than a mile east of the site. The bog is also identified on the King County Critical Area map inventory. The downstream analysis for the approved plat of Petro Vista at the corner of Petrovitsky Road and 118th Avenue. SE (KC File L02P0012) has confirmed that the downstream flow enters the sphagnum bog wetland downstream of the site. The proposed short plat appears to share the same downstream corridor. The conceptual drainage plan must comply with the sphagnum bog criteria per the KCSWDM, Sections 1.2.8.1.0 and 6.1.4. Otherwise, it must be demonstrated that the downstream drainage path from the proposed development does not flow into the sphagnum bog area. The sphagnum bog treatment train must be shown on the conceptual drainage plan. If you have any questions regarding the road or drainage standards, please contact Mark Follmer at (206) 296- 7039. International Fire Code The following are the Fire Engineering comments and conditions regarding the proposed project. A. Any future residences constructed on lots 2 through 5 within this short plat shall be sprinkled (NFPA 13D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Section 503 of the International Fire Code (IFC) requires all portions of the exterior walls of buildings (at grade) to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the structure) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved access is a minimum 20-foot wide unobstructed driving surface that is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end. Parked vehicles are an obstruction. B. To remove the sprinkler requirement it will be necessary to provide a minimum 20-foot wide unobstructed driving surface on Road A and the private driveway access tract. To accomplish this, the curb -to -curb width of Road A and the driveway tract will have to be increased to 36 feet if parking is allowed on both sides or 28 feet if one side of the roadway is designated as a fire lane by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. For any questions regarding the Fire Engineering conditions, please contact Bill Mudd at (206) 296-6785. .acr LF/P1atSCR.Sub 2/24/98 cic KCC 19A, Site Plan A. The location of at least two monuments must be shown on the site plan per KCC 19A.08.130. B. B. The contours must be based on afield survey per KCC 19A.08.150.B.2 For any question regarding the platting requirements of KCC 19A, please contact Pat Simmons at (206) 296- 6636. Please provide the following by April 14, 2008: 1. Six copies of a revised site plan addressing the issues discussed above 2. Six copies of a conceptual road and drainage plan addressing all the issues discussed above 3. Four copies of a revised Drainage report 4. Four copies of a wetland/strearn report 5. A road variance request with appropriate fees, if desired _scr LF/P1atSCR.Sub 2/24/98 C1C Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 11/27/2007 ROAD OR DRAINAGE VARIANCE APPLICATIONS: SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. In order to process your request, three (3) copies of each of the applicable information from the following list shall be submitted with each road and/or drainage variance application. Your application will be screened following submittal, and if any of the items are missing, the application will be considered incomplete. DDES application forms and applicable submittal requirement information referenced below are online via the DDES Web site at www.kingcountygov/permits/ or by calling DDES customer service at 206-296-6600. Variances from road or drainage standards may be granted provided that granting the variance will produce a compensating or comparable result which is in the public interest, and meet the objectives of safety, function, fire protection, and maintainability based upon sound engineering judgment. Granting any variance that would be in conflict with the requirements of any other King County Code will require a separate review and approval process. Items 1 through 4 apply to all road and drainage variance applications: ❑ 1. 1 Completed Variance Application Form Fill out top of appropriate form and provide 3 copies A. Description B. List applicable sections of standards, and C. Justification must provide descriptive reports, analysis, and calculations as necessary. Submittal of photographs is optional but can be helpful and will often expedite the review. ❑ 2. Current Fee Refer to the Fee Schedule online via DDES' Web site at www.kingr-ounty.gov/permits or call DDES at 206-296-6600 for more information. ❑ 3. 1 Site Plan 3 copies Include drawings that show the lots, road layout, site improvements, and a vicinity map. Applicable engineering drawings should also be included. For road variances on short plat applications and right-of-way use permits, submit a current assessor's map with property highlighted in color. ❑ 4. 1 Related Documents 3 copies A. Provide a list of all related applications, including the associated permit number. B. A copy of the ordinance or DDES letter granting preliminary approval. C. A copy of the conditions of approval for related permits. D. A signed copy of either the Certificate of Applicant Status form OR Certificate and Transfer of Applicant Status form. Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinacounfy._gov/permits Road DrainVarAppsSubmillnstructFORMAOC le-ins-rddrvar.pdf 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 1 I rti ) 'v CITY *F RENTON -� Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Denis Law, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator February 8, 2008 Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi King County Department of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-1219 SUBJECT: Notice of Application L07S0079/Lenora Short Plat Dear Ms. Dehkordi: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Application regarding L07S0079/Lenora Short Plat. The City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department would like to comment as follows: • The proposed development is located within the City of Renton's Benson Hills annexation area which will become part of Renton March 1, 2008. Therefore we request that street improvements (roadway pavement widening and thickness, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, etc.) on 116th Avenue SE abutting the development site, and the new internal access road be constructed to City of Renton standards. If you have any questions relating to either of these conditions, please contact Bob Mahn, Civil Engineer, at (425) 430-7322_ Sincerely, Gregg Zimrhe/ma Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator — Transportation Leslie Betiach, Parks Director Dave Pargas Assistant Fire Marshal Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager Bob Mahn, Civil F'ngineer H:Wile Sys1ADM - PBPW AdminstrationlAdmin Sec lU0081SFPAW20808 Notice of Application Lenora ShortRENTON L0750079.doc1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 50%recycled material, 30^/o past Consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVL. CITY OF RENTON �+ Planning / Building / Public Works 1055 South Grady Way - Renton WA 98057 Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi King County Department of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-1219 This paper contains 50% recycled paper, 30 post -consumer 0 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 206-296-6601 www.kingcounty.cLov January 24, 2008 Max Lissak 11121 NE 43TI Street Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Permit Fee Estimate: L07S0079, Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Dear Mr. Lissak: The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has implemented a program for managing certain types of permit applications to provide customers with an enhanced level of customer service. The Project Management Program seeks to provide customers with increased predictability for the permit process and better accountability from County review staff. For permit applications under Project Management, a project manager is assigned to the permit to facilitate communication with the applicant and provide a fee estimate to cover the anticipated scope of review. The project manager will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process to ensure review schedules remain in line with performance standards and the overall work hours are within the range of estimated fees for the project. Your application was received by our office on December 11, 2007, and will be processed by a Project Manager, The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines associated with the preliminary review phase and fee estimate revisions which may affect the permit fees. Please return the signed Acknowledgment Form, page 2 of the enclosure, to my attention at the address specified in the letter head. Failure to return the Acknowledgement Form and pay the deposit within 14 days of the date of this letter may result in the suspension or cancellation of the application. If you have any questions regarding the permit fees, the requirements of the project management program or any other aspects of the review process, please contact me via e-mail at lanny.henoch@kingcounty.gov or by telephone at 206-296-6632. f Lanny Hp6ch, Project Manager Land Use Services Division (LUSD) Enclosure cc: Lisa Dinsmore, Supervisor, Current Planning Section, LUSD, DDES King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Permit Number: L07SO079 I Date: January 24, 2008 Permit Title: Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat I Permit Subtype: Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project -related mitigation fees or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies, or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Bldg Fire Flow Review $138.86 Counter Service Fee for Application Intake $283.76 Total Fixed Fees: $422.62 Estimate for Hourly Fees: (122 Hours x $140.00) $17,080.00 Total Permit Fee Estimate: S17,502.62 Amount Due at Application (100% fixed fees plus 50% of hourly fee $8,962.62 estimate is due.) Less Amount Paid $6,091.31 Amount Due at Application Balance (due immediately) $8,962.62 Permit Fee Estimate Balance to be paid via installments $8,540,00 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours for your project, not to exceed 122 hours and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is performed. The total estimated hours reflect work performed by some, or all, of the following disciplines: Engineering, Land Survey, Engineering Technical Support, Site Development, Critical Areas, Traffic, Project Management and Planning. Please see attached Fee Estimate Worksheet for specific fees. Based upon the attached fee estimate revisions, the number of hours required may be modified. Your permit will be billed using the installment plan you select, not to exceed six equal monthly payments. Your first Project Management Statement will reflect the installment schedule to be paid for your permit. You may choose to pay the balance in full or make monthly payments. To avoid finance charges, please submit the minimum payment each month. If you have questions about the billing statement, please call Elaine Gregory, Finance Manager, at 206-296-7139 or the Billing Hotline at 206-296-6659. King County Land Use Services Division Fee Estimate Acknowledgment Form and Revision Policy Permit Number: L07S0079 Date: January 24, 2008 Permit Title: Lenora Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Estimated Maximum Hours: 122 Applicant: Max Lissak Total Fee: $17,502.62 The applicant is_rgquired to submit a signed copy of this form, acknowledging the estimated cost of this permit and that s/he has read the DDES policy relevant to fee estimate revisions stated below, with their completed application. Failure to do so may result in the cancellation of the application. Fee Estimate Revision Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DDES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fees charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate if, 1. The applicant fails to provide accurate, complete, or timely information. 2. The applicant fails to disclose a site or development issue that creates the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 3. The applicant changes the scope or design of the proposal, creating the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 4. The applicant fails to complete the construction of the project in'a timely manner, creating the need for additional review, unanticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 5. The applicant files an appeal and the Fee Estimate did not anticipate an applicant appeal. 6. The applicant makes a request to separate the review of the project into distinct phases. 7. There has been unauthorized construction on the property, including, but not limited to, clearing or grading, or an associated code enforcement case is opened. 8. The King County Council modifies permit fees. 9. The project is modified, such that there is a change in the building valuation and the resulting building valuation fees. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. ❑ Acknowledged the above ❑ Acknowledged but wish to appeal Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date Applicant/Owner Name (signature) File Number L07S0079 Return to: Planner —LannyHenoch 2 King County INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS, BILLING/PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT PLANS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, APPEALS AND FINANCE CHARGES. Your application is being reviewed under the Project Management program, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Checks may be made out to King County Finance, The Department may remove your project from the Project Management program under the following conditions: • During project review, the applicant changes the proposal to such an extent that the project is below the Project Management threshold. • To accommodate State and Federal procurement regulations. • In accordance with other contractual agreements between the Department and the applicant, including but not limited to Financial Guarantees. • The applicant requests and the Department concurs, if the Department determines that no value will be added to the overall project or it creates a redundancy in the Project Management process. • Projects in default as defined by K.C.C. 27A.20.020. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: You will receive a monthly statement showing any used hours against the estimate. The statement also lists all fees and any past due amount, installment due or budget adjustments that must be paid by the first of the following month. PAYMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Your permit submittal may qualify for participation in a DDES Finance Section policies installment plan. Under the plan, you must pay an initial amount, typically 50% of the fee estimate plus 100% of the fixed fees. The remaining balance will be billed in monthly installments. Each monthly statement will include any past due amounts, current fees, or budget adjustments, and any installments due by the first of the following month. You will be required to pay the'Total Amount Due' as reflected on the "Remittance Advice" page for your Project Management Statement. Any remaining balance will be billed in equal monthly installments on subsequent Project Management Statements. You may make full payment of the 'Total Balance' reflected on the first page of the Project Management Statement at any time; however you must make the amount due on the remittance advice in order to avoid finance (late) charges. If the project is approved before all of the installment payments are billed, all outstanding balances will be billed on the subsequent statement. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND APPEALS: An appeal process to project management fee estimates is in legislation. The authority and details of the procedures have not yet been finalized. By checking the Acknowledged the above, the applicant/owner consents to the information provided in this letter. However, if you check the Acknowledge but wish to appeal box, the applicant/owner is contesting the estimated cost of the permit and requesting an appeal on said costs. The applicant/owner will be notified of the stipulations and requirements to complete an appeal. Acknowledgement and the required application materials are mandatory prior to the review of the pen -nit application. In addition, you are still required to pay the deposit, current balance and any future installments. Failure to do so will result in finance charges. L9 King County Land Use Services Division Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet Permit Type: Pnllminaryr SW" Plat PermittPreApp No: L07S0078 Prepared For: -- - ' - -- T Permit Type: PRE-SP A. Counter Service Intake 27.06.030 Intake Group 3 284.00 $ 283.76 e Fire Protection Plan Review 27.10.040 Type of Permit E Short Subdivisions $ 136.86 35 35 Mrs. $ 4,900,00 SEPA Threshold: 0 Mrs. erd Fees PAIL 20 20 Hrs. $ 2,800.00 8 Mrs. $ 1,120.00 lEngilneeirina Review. 40 40 Mrs, $ 5,600,00 Final Su Review FR 6 Mrs. $ 840.00 ex -row}, ,7 , . '. 0 His. I J GO 22 WL 13 35 13 Mrs. 8 1 820.00 K. Exceptions and Variances 27.10.140 Estimate: Mrs. Current Pfapning Section 01/24/2008 Subtype: PRE-SP Total Fixed Fees: $422.82 $ 422.62 Hourly Fee: $ 17,081100 Total Estimated Review Hours: 122 Total Fee Esffine e: $17,502.62 Fee Payment to Date: $6,091.31 Balance. $11,411.31 update versian 061107 Number of InsmOwnents: 6 Web date: 00114=7 LAND USE PERMIT KingCourrty ,APPLICATION FORT Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 dak%dare Avenue Southweqf. Renton, WA 98057-57.tz For alternate formats, cah 206-296-.13500. 206-Z96-66Mi TTY 206-296-7217 51sT Use Ord Do not vwtike in t 7,Date C; Application DEC 112007 Lo - 00", Tl1� a " Received (star rip) >na Iv Y&9W 1 I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s). 11 Binding site plan © Public agency & utility exception [] Site development permit ❑ Boundary firm adjustment ❑ Reasonable use exception ❑ Site -specific comprehchsive plan ❑ Building permit ❑ Reuse of public schools amendment l Conditional use permit ❑ flight -of -Way use permit ❑ special dirt overlay removal ❑ Critical areas alteration exception ❑ Road variance ❑ special use permit ❑ Linear ❑ Non41near ❑ Shoreline conditional use permit Subdivision — Formal ll Drainage variance or adjustment ❑ Shoreline exemption Subdivision -4 . i', _ . . ❑ Period review for mining sites El Shoreline redezignation El 'Temporary user perrmrt ❑ Plat alteration ❑ Shoreline substantial development ❑ Urban planned development ❑ Plat vacation permit ❑ gone reclassification ❑ P-suffix amendment ❑ Shoreline variance ❑ Zoning variance 1, ,A j t .�S �e , being duly swam, state that I am the owner OF affi er of the corpo Ton owning propedy described in the legal description filed with this application and that I hmm reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and irnvironmental Services (ODES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best oy" (Knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for 13M staff to m e no or more site visits- By signing this application farm, you are giving permission far these visits. if it i I Properly, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. Printed Name ':!�tcy 4zXSd_T signature —� company Phone '2rr!6 - 7,7 —[5 2. E-mail � f1. c'_s / z' Mailing Address S9RFE 11121 rve .3-Bfp S Sz Zip If applicable, state below the name, address and telephone number of the authorizad applicant for this application as shown on the Certi€cation and Transfer of Application $taws form tiled with this. application. Name Phone - E-mail Mailing Address P AppForLandtlsePwmit0F0RM.d6 SI-R�� lc-app-luper.pdf OW14120V I Page 1 1012 D JAN 1 LlJUB K.C. D.D.E.S. �033 Send -the pasting package for the notice board for this application to: the owner/applicant the consultanVagent (engineer, architect, etc-) Send letters, including those reouesting additional information for this applicaton, to: C{ the owner/applicant P the consuitantlagent Note: Application forms and subMittal requirements are subject to revision without notice_ For Formal Subdivisions OF EGIV5RED Pl ate/f�� G[C ENGIIVI=-ER'(COMPANY1 . STREET ADgRESS d�� ���� CITY - STATE ZIA 10EVELOPER (COMPANY) CITY — STATE Zip Land surveyor's CertiFication I hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and regulatlons of the plettit3g ratolution and Stan for King Ca nty, Washington. DATA -� A y NA64E INDIVIDUAL) - .y.. TI✓ LWHQNE T E-MAIL NAME (INDIVIbuAI-) —^ TEi.EPHONE F_ MAIL Check out the DDES Web Side at WkW ki a+orcdurrt j_tymits AppF0rLandUseParM4$FQRM.doc li -a-aW1liper.pdf QW14 2007 Palo 2 of 2 L19 King Counter Department of Development and Environmental Services 90D oakesdale Avenue Southwest kenton, WA 98057-5212. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www. metrokC.goV FAX OVER SHEET w PHONE NO.: 0492 w !vV 2— Total number of pages including this cover sheet: 3 Date: IZI Y 0 Z? - Time: 10 : a6 4.. From: d Phone: 00� �717 Sender's Name Sender's Phone Permit Narne/Nurnber: _ L 07'50071 Comments: rLtw 2 �-e 5�o r . c1 r S�t . talb Z�� r Jul{7-�r 1 er►�1inw'er f 6 (.t4,e, -r 71, q r a" ------------- If you wish to receive a copy of the DD—" report and decision of this application, - mplete and return this {portion of the, -notice to the Land Use: ices Division at the address listed abo File No.: L07SO079 Please print) f Address: �j °7 Telephone No.: t'/ ~_ 4/ King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal TyDe2 NOA 4 � a I • f: N Tn N. A.°. k cvN o AA S k o aT e/AT_ 44oK.'Y�5 AT TA,'S O1ZeL,'w,,'NAA7 A V ,,f A G TO LC1 � f� 1' r` � To �a� T a 7/4 To T� p ��►7"`•°ate paNd X"i- S jHc C,(z-ouNc� �1 N► ry �'-` ci u w �` 7' h 5 c� �L c w 1-4 T C !� NWTl4.S33,T23N,RD5E,WJ& Q6NIL K M Nr �M$ :MO i QII1R 69�I�Wf y�, �r --- -- -`----- - - - - - ,•ro \ ,� W=CRr # 1 2 I I S I L — — — I I I TRACT a - - - - - - _ J i.- _ _ - I ! PROJECT DESCRIPTION_ 8E L ACREAGE: 0.97 - I I NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED: 6 a e ❑ EIVSTINC ZONE. R-S 2 PROPOSED VSE:SNGLE FAMRY RESDENTIAL ROAD A ` _ _ J O SEWER DISTRICT: SDOS CREEK WATER k SEWER WATER DISTRICT: SODS CREEK WATER Jc SEWER S PRIVATE ACt*W TRACT SCHOOL DISTRICT. ROTON #40 REcRan�,ccE5e '. v- I PIRE MTRICT: IONG CA. FIRE PROTECTION (XE L 40 TELEPHONE SERIACES: OWEST POWER SOURCE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY J I I 3 WATER OUALITY TREATMENT STANDARD: BASIC C7 �� --------------� - --- r FLOW CONTROL STANDARD: CONSERVATION vy � 5 -- � �---__.___._--- I BUILDING SETBACKS: A� 4 r SIDE: 5' REAR: 5' S L- ---_-- ! I __ '` FRONT: I0' U r -U L--� -- `-J L-------------J GARAGE: 20' IJ S S 775 LEGAL DESCRIPTION .`Ii-g� i F LOT 5 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS 06 tip. / DIVISION 1, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 194804013798397, a I a J 8 D EIE vE oa a o z DEC 112007 D r � K.C. D.D. E.S. stn °z ,J - L. o-7 5 00 7 9 SHC£T � U 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 26, 2007 TO: Kim Claussen, Project/Planner Manager III, Current Planning Section FM: Pat Simmons, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section Via: Ray Florent, Engineer III,Engineering Review Section Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi RE: Proposed Short Plat for Lenora LUSD File No. L07SO079 Comments of the above project 1. The location of at least two monuments must be show on the map (KCC 19A.08.130(B)). We cannot verify the location is as shown on the map. 2. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC 19A.08.150(B)(2). A statement to this effect must be shown on the preliminary map. 3. This is a legal lot per the approved March 1948 Plat. 4. The area of density calculation is 42,441 square feet. �Q� King County Department of Development and Environmental Services for", a Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-29�-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Drop -Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division IMPORTANT*************************** 4 Date Received by LUSn PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR FOR ALL DROP-OFFS a Project NaProjectName FROMC" it �'!?vl � S Company Na e I Contact Pcison DEC 2 NG 7 Telephone No: Z3�J 3 / C* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat i Plats Please specify item(_) drooped -off. Lot Line Adjustment Permit 'Ieasz� s eCfV s) d1 -1-1;ed-crf_ Right of Way Permit -'lease s{�er_;ify ifern(si dreui=�::-off Clea rint i Gradinq PerlTEjt —Additional Irtormat�on reqtested. Other: PLEASE NOTE: ' ll !!:,!� _: { �n+'_ ,,Ili I� � i�_tCle : Irt,�, ;an,'tl!i1 ] - ,=U I;1�311.III I i I I I illJ'll'i:l' j; linrl, lz Check oflt the DDES Wets site ai _Ni; 0 REQUEST FOR King County Dept. of Development andEnvirenmental SCHOOL INFORMATION Services Land Use Services Division PRELIMINARY PATS 900 oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 DATE: a 17 TO: Renton School District #403 FM: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager RE: Proposed Lenora Short Plat LUSD File No. L07SO079 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a short subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the short plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on December 11, 2007. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students liv Elementary Jr. High/Middle Sr. High in this subdivision would attend? Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? I I l"' Elementary Jr. High/Middle Sr. High If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops w+ll be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary_ Jr. High/Middle . _.".._ F ��G%_ Sr. High Other Comments: Please complete this form and return it by December 28, 2007 to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call Fereshteh Dehkordi at 206-296-7173. Thank you. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 LUSD/FORMS/CPSFORMS/P,EQSCHOL.INFC / Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 King County 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMFN-rAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdaie Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 i f I i F I I I F I I I I I I I k I F I f i I I I I 1 1 1! I ii i l I F I J i j i 11 I i I j F k l I i F k k l i k II Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov December 21, 2007 Max Lissak Lenora Apartments, LLC 11121 NE 43rd Street Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application, Lerona A artme s Application No. L07S0079, Filed on December 11, 2007 Dear Mr. Lissak: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on December 20, 2007 the Land Use Services Division determined that the above -referenced application is incomplete under the current requirements for a complete application as specified in Ordinance No.12196. This initial determination is intended is used only for the purposes of applying the time period established in this Ordinance. The following information is needed for this application to be considered complete. � Drainage Information: • List each drainage system component of the downstream drainage course on the Drainage System Table and label each component on the map, such as culverts, ditches, and overland flow, with its corresponding symbol from the Drainage System Table. • The drainage map should use the best available topography map, including streets and property lines. • Show the drainage complaints on the same leap as the downstream drainage system. • Provide a copy of any relevant drainage complaint from DNRP Water and Land Resources Division. • Provide a detailed summary of the physical inspection for on- and off -site drainage systems. • The study area shall extend downstream one mile. The downstream path from this project may pass through a sphagnum bog drainage area. • Each drainage system component and problem shall be addressed in the offsite analysis report in three places: on a map (Task 1), in the narrative (Task 4), and in the Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table (See Reference Section 8-B). Land Use Services Division will keep your application "on hold" pending receipt of the above information, during which time no further review will take place. Pursuant to King County Ordinance 11296, Section 12.E., if all this requested information is not received within 90 days from the date of this letter, your application will be canceled. No time extensions will be granted. Should the application be canceled, you will be required to submit a new application. If you have any questions about the information requested, please contact Mark Follmer at (206) 296-7039. For questions regarding your permit application process, please contact me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager P Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Dennis Alfredson, Plat & Site Civil Design, LLC Kim Claussen, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Application file REQUEST FOR King County . Dept. of Development and Env:mnrler a SCHOOL INFORMATION' Services [ Land Use Services Division P R L+MONi i'iit i PLATS 90D oakesdale Avenue Soi.itha,est Renton, WA 98057-5212 DATE: j a 117 � O TO: Renton School District #403 FM: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager RE: Proposed Lenora Short Plat LUSD File No. L07SO079 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD; has received an applicatiorj for a short subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the short plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on December 1 1 , 2007. In order for us to adequately evaluate thi: proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District hetter, please provide us with the following information: Which schoois do you anticipate the stuc:erJs living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary ---- Jr. High/Middle Sr. HighWill the students walk or be busses to these schools Elementary _...-------- Jr. High/Middle Sr. If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops tvIII be located? if that information is not available at this time; currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary Jr. High/Middle _— — ----_ Sr. High Other Comments: Please complete this €orm and return it by December 28, 2007 to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call Fereshten Dehkordi at 206-296-7 1 .., 3. Thank you. King County Departmen, of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Divisicr- ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi.. Project Manager 900 Oakesdale Avenu, Southwest Renton, WA 98057-52 12 1AAIN 'FILE COPY LUSD/FORMS/CPSF9RMS/REQSCJ;C? PRINCI MIN I r AL_ R A07PM 196 ARTERIALS /V Streets W2W Bodies Parcels Cites Plot date: Jun 18. 2007: %Wdos001W11@Wav dav%"9d9U)aso2-W K I N G C D U N T Y 411i!..`71Tid:--I, w rw M1l!=IiIW4 N,'- AWJIM klo", I7, pw K I N G C 0 U N T Y IN NOE 4M N Lima M . ........... A07PM196 gull". HYDRO/GEO �A FFA 4 4 j 2 r p.'+ y �./ ME M Topo t2M5 5 /V 10 3.Jd Eagie Nests (WOFM Wildlife NMworlk A/ 0 2P �, YV 3 U "S SAO Watland (INS) SAO Landslide w SAO Coa� Mine SAO Seisrriic 'AT.P%d SAO i Willi 'Woo, L VVabwBod[as i. M, M WLRD Dmnago Cornplants T. Bald ■IS@& Nwt and Roost Buffers MDFW) -7 I loss K's V 40• 0 Foot Ny 11 Foat or Shoreline V 1320 Foot 80 mks... W.41111 - - — 11 M I FEPAA Cross Sectioris L ftsrjdml• -, FEMA Floodway am "x FEMA 100-yr, Fioodplalri Ditiss fro Ma TMENA •'-"FY,W1- I■ Mill ti sa 104 ii . • _REN ��s ■ems k; ■I�i�It■■'r�■ F �'• � 1�. ' CIF � - 'ITi��. ■��■ t��_ _ - �I r % The IMormatwn S"Udad on Tt4 map h= been ..Plied by Kirig Coumy staff tram a variety Is m of sours wnd waled C4wgo WftL t WtG . woo Carnty maims w 7 rePX to lcm w waTan , emren -;.piled, as to tfr — accuracy, comPleterross. tir_ i—, w rights,o the u_ of such infom3edan, Nino Canty shell ml ba ;ride for any general. Spavd. irltllreGf, lr ddental. a conseauandal .\ damaee lndudkg. bttt not Iknited m, lost revenues a lost 4 f profits resutting tom the use w misuse of the IMormalion -.faired an tNs Mp, Any sale M Na map a Infwma4on ors this map Is prGNbft8d ewropt by written pemJsslwi of lCr9 �N. Plot date: Jun 18, 2007;15ddespplUaPllglslav deV4projectela9sa2.apr K I N G C O U N T Y 1 i OOF F l iYk ih 01 LILL, Now - rim. ■ 11 ► Is i♦ !f I I.(1 1 fl♦ �' l 1' E, i. /I 1 t "p,-I W-1,1-91 C� T I I—/Y\I /r T 1 ;• t t! 0 1/�i I j) Alv/!�/!♦1 I { i —1 / 1 t\I I %I \1 1 ,1 ♦ _.r 1♦ 1 l \ ! 1 I, I �•A l i i I t \ PL A07PM196 CAO /V Water Course (WLR) Streets Water Bodies 1 I / CrMcal Area Cesignadon _ \ y< Wildlife Habitat Conssrvatton Areas (2004) Q Area of Potential Wetland Influence (2004) E=] Parcels Aquatic Areas Buffer (2004) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas (2004) Y i♦ I/ 1 f �2 —� 3 \wf 1 ,4 r I t Basin CondMon (2004) _ '\ High \ Medium I L� Low .♦ .. { o Cities r \Z;I—I tl f �1 1♦[ l 1 1{ E f 1 V LT L I ♦ © Feet �\ yl V= 500 feet •» Ig KkVC-.ty 1 f♦F-1 I Nl♦ � i ♦ The Infmllauan Induded do tns map hue been comgled by ♦ , \ — IOrg Canty *tar from a vadaty or wuroae and Is sugen m change wttW nodca. King County malars no [ I I I \ u 1 l i 1 repre Uldom or warrantee. eVor impl led, - t. th. am.V, cmnpt.rerless, ttnellneee, a dghw to m. use of Y ♦ such uRormatm. K4g COInh dh fl rwt be Bade far any general. We W Intllrect incidental. or—mquarlJd 1 —I` — I I 7a' '1 damages kul+drg. buI not limited to, Ioel revenue& a Icet Mflo revA g frmrr the aea or ml— of the Infonnethn { ♦ �, _ Dram t" map ie pr Uted umplt t? w-Mm pwrrYwb of Kft SII ,♦ r ./f Gounty, Plot date: Jun 18, 2007;14ddas0071z0ilgistav_dav�mjec%%ase2.apf owe,. �r. 1 r1lut dale: Jun I a. 2007; %Wdas001bffi11pis%av dev4projects46asa2.apr h f� V. • 1 t - 2005 PHOTO r i Iz- Ir 4- 7 zs `lir`r,li,r J • --i r' .�F 5_ II, 'I. Township Lines QSLINES 1, A. I x f w•�` 'y 4 '"' SEGLINES /- �"'�I�i TWPLINES r Y Water Bodies y ♦ r �T�,'r_ i' \'"*_ �.,,'. }} j E-1 Parcels s I Cities Ilk �•' i - 1- .. _ 1" -� :. ter— .1 _ �f 1 `4E 1 1 ttr r k — t e11 _ 1"'f—•AFC - r I F I - .rt. - i . qr - y Y �} �r •ww - a 1'�. :�.., war. ' ` � ._. l � - —. �•w I ram- 1 r ` 1 �..- i.-_., r•q ;ir- t�, ��'�_t..i- _ ., : o 400 Feat 1"=500 feet 1'" �.- + f ' • i a0' i fi"„ - 1Te InfO-atldn II m tl I, map has been —pled by r \ r ♦ 1 + • yGkq Canty era% fmrn s venw.ry d sources arm ie arbJeq to rT cNuge withou AO pN caunro 6BirB60n1BLOn6NwBllarthes eWraea pr m➢I;eC. Be b th. '- - _ L-1 ' t i - �- - -• 1 _ *` 6 Iitom,etarw K. �Cau�nty-all lot be au fx er,/ ♦ -I IL`[•'_Y J r "'r 9e^eral. 6Pedel. uldireG. iI or canee9eandel - _ _ i - -- DrOMS r wi IA ft .. but not Ilmloatl to, loaf re'ronuoc a lost - . - - _ prellta resultlry from tNa use or mfauce of Me wnlolrrwlttlon -x tamed on W 6 map Arty sale d tnia Imp or Informason �- � ���+a off ihla map Is proNbited except by w.ftten panhlaslon of iGrg Plat date: Jun 18, 2007.%Wdas0011x9'tigislav-GeYipro)ects%base2.apr L9 King County The information Included in this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, DDES Parcel Information Report as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such This report was generated: 6/18/2007 1:06:08 PM Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indlrect, incidenW, or consequential damages including, but not limited Parcel Number: 6196600100 to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting From the use or misuse of the information contained in this report. Any sa3e of this report or information on this report Is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600100 Tax Payer: BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Property Name: N/A Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 Postal City Reference Info Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat Recording Bate: N/A Plat Lot: 5 Plat Block: 1 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 42,447 SgFt. (0.97 Acres) 7y Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2005 - $84,000, 2006 - $140,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 - $147,000, 2006 - $109,000 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 (403) Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads NIPS Zone: 342 ($3,765) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Sewer System: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police 3urisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Page 1 of 2 Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A ) Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tenzing Thinley -F Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: Conservation Flow Water Quality: Basic Water Quality Treatment Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None Page 2of2 Lei King County DDE5 Permit Information Report This report was generated: 6/18/2007 1:07:39 PM Parcel Number: 6196600100 The information Included in this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and ks subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, time less, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained in this report. Any sale of fts report or information on this report is prohibited except by written permission of King County. E9400232 ENFORCE CLOSED ACCUMULATION OF JUNK VEHICLES 6196600100 FREILINGER NINA 212211994 E0600531 ENFORCE CLOSED 6196600100 6/612006 B0710012 INSPDEMO ISSUED DEMO INSPECTION 6195600100 LISSAK MAX 1/17/2007 A07PM196 PREAPP-M PENDING LISSAK PRE -AP 6196600100 LISSAK MAX 6/4/2007 Page 1of1 Page 1 of 4 LQ King County By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Taxpayer BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Tax Year 2007 Tax Status TAXABLE Appraised Land Value Appraised Improvement Value Account Number 619660010007 Levy Code 4250 Taxable Value Reason NONE OR UNKNOWN $145,000 Taxable Land Value $145,000 $123,00.0 Taxable Improvement Value $123000 Taxpayer BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Account Numb er 619660010007 Tax Year 2008 Levy Code 4250 Tax Status TAXABLE Taxable Value Reason NONE OR UNKNOWN Appraised Land Value $159,000 Taxable Land Value $159,000 AppraisedImprovement $135A00 Taxabie:lmprovement Value $135,000,; Value Tip: Use the Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report to see more sales records details Sale Date 11/9/2006 Sale Price $Q Seller Name BAKHCHINYAN KARINA Buyer Name LISSAK MAXIM Sale Date 11/9/2006 Sale Price.: $495,000 Seller Name FREILINGER NINA Buyer Name BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Sale Date 11/9/2006 Sale.Price .$0 Seller Name BOGOLYUBOV ROZANNA Buyer Name BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTIN Sale Date 11/9/2006 Sale Price. $0 Seller Name ROTSTEIN OLGA Buyer Name ROTSTEIN EDWARD •Parcel Records: District Name KING COUNTY Property Name TypePropertyRESIDENTIAL_ ...... . ..... Page 2 of 4 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN Present Single Family Plat Name TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Use (Res UselZone) Plat Block 1 Water WATER System DISTRICT Plat Lot 5 Sewer. PRIVATE System , Lot Area 42,447 SgFt (0.97 acres) Access PUBLIC Section/Township/Range NW 33 23 5 Street Surface. PAVED Account Number 619660010007 Legal Description 51 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV # 1 Assessor ResidentialRecords: Address 17804 116TH AVE SE 98058 Building Grade Fair Condition Average Bedrooms' 2 Year Built 1925 Baths 1 Year Renovated 0 112 Baths 0 Total Living SgFt 840 3/4Baths 0 1st Floor SgFt 840 Stories 1 Half Floor SgFt 0 Single Story Fireplace 0 , 2nd Floor SgFt 0 Multi Story Fireplace 0 Upper Floor SgFt 0 Free Standing 0 Fireplace . Total Basement SgFt 0 Basement Garage SgFt 0 Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage SgFt 0 SgFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR UNKNOWN Open Porch SgFt,:. 80 Daylight Basement Enclosed Porch SgFt 40 Heat System Elec 1313 Deck SgFt 0 Heat Source Electricity Percent Brick Stone 0 Address Building Grade Low Condition Fair Bedrooms 3' Year Built 1949 a.t.h.s 1 Year Renovated 0 11Z Baths 0 Total Living SgFt 1010 314 Baths 0 1st Floor SgFt 1010 Stories .' 1 Half Floor SgFt 0 Single Story Fireplace; 0:. 2nd Floor SgFt 0 Multi Story Fireplace 0 Page 3 of 4 Upper Floor SgFt 0 Free Standing Fireplace : 0 Total Basement SgFt 0 Basement 'Garage SgFt 0 Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage SgFt .. 0 SgFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR UNKNOWN Open Porch SgFt .... 0 Daylight Basement Enclosed PorchSgFt 120 Heat System Elec BB Deck SgFt 0 Heat Source Electricity and Solar percent Brick Stone 0 Address 17802 116TH AVE SE 98058 Building Grade Fair Condition Fair 'Bedrooms': 2 Year Built 1925 Baths, { . Year Renovated 0 112 Baths 0 Total Living SgFt 1490 314'.Baths 0 1st Floor SgFt 940 Stories 1 Half Floor SgFt 550 Single StoryF!replace 0 2nd Floor SgFt 0 Multi Story:.Fireplace. Upper Floor SgFt 0 Free Standing Fireplace - . 0 Total Basement SgFt 0 Basement Garage 0t' 0 Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage'.SgFt 0 Sg Ft Finished Basement Grade NONE OR UNKNOWN Open Porch SgFt 0 Daylight Basement Enclosed Porch SgFt 0 Heat System Elec BB Deck SgFt: 0 Heat Source Electricity Percent Brick Stone 0 This report was generated: 6118/2007 1:08:13 PM Related on-line reports: King C.ounty_GI_S: Property information FAQ King County Assessor: Submit a request to -correct this information DDES: Permit Applications Report King County:. Districts and Development Conditions Report King Counter Assessor;._eRea.l Property Repoort (PDF format requires Acrobat] King County_ Assessor: Quarter Section Map Report PDF format requires Acrob� King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report Recorders Office: Scanned -lima es of plats, surveys, and other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT D1 ASSESSMENTS 4 NO-.-ITERN GARDEN TAACTS sP NO. 2 4' L A .6 1 NW 33-23-05 r ., 3ttI.5Z (Pi Y,I0SJ;Bo�4 ?g 9006 I 9 I tI '; a 9063 904 8 902ti 6le 4 5 S.E. PETROVITSKY ROAD + --- '.. a s c. se aJlaE-9 n!. 9:a-3fi S.E. 176TH ST. T7.41 -- 5.. 84.2-0719`,9 - 3 j 'il ---:!p1.87 96 -v0.6i „01.81 D ]d ,4 ndi? � 1 � =(0021 — .. ~ 81Jfij 125€sj L as 'S2�6� o ` ;1S U420 � 97 9J.E1 a. 0361 9a71 4; .. 7 5Q1 67 103 , 92.82 N i9-1C f 2 1£ 114 REV- 67 e 4152.1 �1 —Ili 101-45-- 42s2 36 I IfiLIA Tf�. A HNB--A9 S06:j +,4u 7513C.74 ---- LOT. KC.SP. 677188 �- g 4j� KC SR 1283045 8407030842 S5 40i2605 3.62 Ac 1 ]0 __ n 88-31-I4 wow.— ^i I 1 92t 1 � 1 912y SI� �-Hf U4-H` I16 �Ii1 m 148,ec �I L A 72 85.92 a I U� LJ O.ZI AC 41J 4C Z 9255 9258 +~o i23/5;4 I. PL. I 114 0082 - 7�712220667IL'36 o 2 LC- 2'Q448 1t2ta� _0060 _ , _ ls0061 0320 619660 4 4 NORTHWESTERN ,1C3L. RW-,T 42�F1� 3a }}r I� 4 4 24471 5 ow 't- MITIN i� GARDEN TRACTS PIV 4247?t i KCSP L97S0042 19990920900003 - 181461 ;dFE3� q, 0280' I 0285 r A �694J J0G.9S I 41411r 0260 I 7 :41WI3� �Wee—jlw zle�rz r ram• � �� �' (i) King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Land Use Pre -application Meeting Request Form To be completed by DDES Staff Pre -application No. �o �Oiyl/9/ Please print Date Received (Stamp) R_DI L vf, nnF ❑ I am interested in receiving FREE information and design assistance regarding compliance with Green Building and/or Low Impact Development. King County will contact the applicant. Applicant Name 44rY I Date-/8-2Ck97 Address 1112/ �1 SS3'�Ds�" �-►�f f�1� g � 3 Phone21 Fax,296-o?ta9- 4PXy E-mail AA(�S,54C^W11,, C-0172 Project Description ,S`6i,,� p/Aql" Aff /i c.,ha-, Permits being requested Project Address/Location Q Ave SE Parcel No(s) 1 fvf QG Please indicate if pre -application is: ❑ Land Use Feasibility Mandatory ❑ Consolidated heck the box(es) regarding issues you wish to discuss: Land Use Permit Issues: Subdivision / CUP / Variances / Reasonable Use / PAUE ❑ Site Issues: Zoning / Setbacks / Density / Subdivision Design / Landscaping ❑ Site Issues: Traffic 1 Road Access / Road Improvement / Road Variances / Parking Layout ❑ Site Issues: Drainage / Site Development / SWDM Variances & Adjustments ❑ Shoreline Issues: Substantial Development Permit / Permitted Uses / Shoreline Setbacks ❑ SEPA Issues: SEPA Checklist I Off -Site Im �ents / Mitigation ❑ Wetland/Stream Iss,4g ;Bins ! g� / Flood Plains / Mitigation ❑ Geotechnical lssu&.:: t4ep t pe 'd d / Seismic / Coal Mine / Erosion ❑ Clearing/Grading Wsue�:t"Sflle bevelopment / Clearing Restrictions / Site Restoration ❑ Building Issues: Building / Mechanical: HVAC/Energy/ Barrier -Free Standards ❑ Fire Issues: UFC / Fireflow / Access I Sprinklers / Alarms / Hazardous Materials ❑ Health Issues: Sewer / Septic / Water! Groundwater/Noise Impacts ❑ Other (Specify): LandUsePreapMeetingslnfoAndRegPORMAOC Ic-infreq-preap.pdf 09128/2006 Page 3 of 4 Revised for Web: 08112/2005 Please indicate the numbers and types of representatives that will be at the pre -application meeting from your design team: Will Not Will Will Not Will ttend 'Attend Applicant Attend ❑ Attend ❑ Geotechnical Consultant Attend ❑ ❑ Architect ❑ ❑ Landscape Architect ❑ ❑ ❑ Civil Engineer ❑ ❑ Legal Consultant ❑ ❑ ❑ Developer rgf--- ❑ Property Owner Total Number Attending Will Not Attend ❑ Structural Engineer ❑ Wetlands Consultant ❑ Others: I certify that I am the applicant for this pre -application meeting request and I understand that DDES will assess hourly review fees for each DDES staff member involved in pre -application research, meetings and post -meeting follow-up work, and that I assume financial responsibility for all fees associated with this requeo I signature Note: An advance deposit of $392.44 is required to schedule a pre -application meeting. Make checks payable to King County Office of Finance. If you have any questions about your pre -application meeting, please contact DDES at 206-296-6600, Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Land UsePreapMeetingslnfaAndRegFdRM.doc Ic-infreq-preap.pdf 09/28/2006 Page 4 of 100.00 100.00 101,13 Lot I Lot 2 Lot 3 Ln 5RI. .... . ........ ..... .. ............ 'i IL `�U -H Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 4 .9o71NI e? / (cp Ol 2007 K.C. D.D,E.S, Z�SS�A SE TILE WA B1 29 i,iA Y , ;J(:) 7 F11%,I a r x . Department of Development and Environmental Services Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 :.� :�W - USA Fi+sC-G�ass 3;=.3ifif!ii!sI H .- i.i, f.; J ...Hid ir.. : :r. 3.: rF:r3 King County Department of Transportation - Certificate of Transportation Concurrency Page 1 of 1 Road Services Divsion Department of Transportation King Street Center 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-0245 Certificate #: 100120 Date Issued: 06/21/07 Expiration Date: 06/20/08 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PERMITS AND URBAN SHORT PLAT PERMITS Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a development permit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation may be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. 1. Property Location a. Property Address: 17802 116th Avenue SE b. Parcel Number: 619660010007 c. Urban or Rural: U 2. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: USP 3. Single family - Number of Units: 6 4. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. Linda Daugherty, Director, Road Services Division Department of Transportation King County, Washington http://dot.metrokc.gov/roads/planning/concurrency/certificate.cfm 06/21/2007 01 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdnle Avenue Soul !]west r ]Iton,WA98055-1?19 I n-- V - ZIA S a.p MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator B E kESaLER TO: Engineer MARK EQLL O EQ (EDEH) RE: Field Check Observations Date I ' 22-- 8 FEE-0 I- 1-1 • S I. P'ROJI:CT NUMBER / NAME Address / Location z Related Project # I Name A 0- P E1..9 u� Thomas Map Page (new) (a B(O _ Thomas Guide Page (old) iL I.I L] 2. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL q V BQ! �/ ! D D 9 7 ACRES QE_ 2— G _.N� (c) LDS . LLS s O .- , Y ,. a L R DA-I S 0 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION Parcel #(s) [ /fit 9 l0 p Do 100 S-T-R 3-1'23' d Kroll Mai S Acres / Feet2 Ol 71 A Current Zoning, - -to Community Plan-OQIS_�E� _ Comprehensive Plan Limited Text Entry PAGE ! 4. SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE# 5ITECONTAINS YES NO SM ABUTS YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands 111 ❑ 9 ❑ S ►TE HAS REX�LY aEgi a CLoee7CD Wetland # Wetland Class Drainage Basin Sub Basin Critical Basin? 0 • Streams _❑ [Q ❑ Z Stream Class Stream Name • 100-year Floodplain _.❑ E� ___❑ [f • Erosion Hazard ❑ W .__.❑ 2 • Landslide Hazard __❑ Q, ❑ Z • Seismic Hazard ❑ V_—❑ [+1 • Coal Mine Hazard ___❑ I ❑ V • Other known SA's —❑ ❑ __❑ ❑ Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site? YES Dos ce FEMA FIRM number In FEMA Floodplain? 0 Soils Mapped �t Map # Best available Topographical Map 1 i S. SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION? its # _ ► �♦ rr • L ME �Mv_ E WA011"11 MEMO ■ EI C) �� • Q13 C %��_ • .�' . pis G'' •.IkX, a_ b. EXISTING SITE FEATURES Unmapped Sensitive Areas: CW5 1 -0�7 _Tp SC T- Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: Ground Cover: -M Qf7 lDEE,�P—i5 11J M'yit.} Dl'� 1 � tiV_1WFL, 10000 HA-VLLAZVA�'� c 4cal L)s Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan? Wildlife and habitats: Water Wells: Work started on site? _.CL P VIA 'AD7 Z-COI ; _ - Closed depression >5000 feet? ❑tr Steep slopes? M .� 7. DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records SEE Al-Mr-d-M ELI S Proposal will add >5000ft' of new impervious surface? If H Approximate Area Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft2? © 9 Approximate Area Upland ! onto pVp OF 1-H r ■ = '� �� ' % J • !! it On -site Drainage- •�. a12 Downstream ! . "• r ■ P y ,M► r LL- "C ctJ d F -a s t 0 1*-12�- Dr7aiinaage Description Matches T.I.R.? SetsU •�1J�S. _ime—A- ` ZV_'r NCj: PAGE 3 8. EXISTING ROAD NETWORK On' site Roads Adjacent Roads I 0 1J t' ST S QO Closest Transit Stop 8. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT IMPACTS ON SOIL AND WATER 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PAGE 4 10 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN 500 FEET AND ADJACENT USE I 1 NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN PAGE 5 ROJECT. LO'9b679 Location: 11780411GTHAVE SE Status: IPENDING APPLICANT: ILENORAAPARTMENTS LLC-WNM LISSAK Date: 12/1172617 `p. op YI�] 9;wrg-�` Applicant ]LEN, RIX .TM NT$ LLG-WIN!`LiSSAK...,:, Per: FD E: H Rev. En r.: MFOL Occupancy]� Amwr-A Pam: .12."E W62 Balance Oue: Deve op m .......... . E Decision: l 1 Expires: ,_ Z:: Recorded _1 1 Complete: ,_, l_1 Last Status Change: '.� Entered by lffl—IPLETTS . [date E rere.. Tuesday, Jan 22, 2008 02:08 PM Applicant ]LEN, RIX .TM NT$ LLG-WIN!`LiSSAK...,:, Per: FD E: H Rev. En r.: MFOL Occupancy]� Amwr-A Pam: .12."E W62 Balance Oue: Deve op m .......... . E Decision: l 1 Expires: ,_ Z:: Recorded _1 1 Complete: ,_, l_1 Last Status Change: '.� Entered by lffl—IPLETTS . [date E rere.. Tuesday, Jan 22, 2008 02:08 PM LN King County DDES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 6/18/2007 1:06:08 W Parcel Number: 6196600100 ,mod Base Into Parcel dumber: 6196600100 Tax Payer: BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Property Name: N/A Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 Pstal City -: Reference Info The information included in this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to chango without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, tlmellness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained in this report. Any sale of this report or information on this report is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO, 01 Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 5 Plat Bloch: 1 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 42,447 SgFt, (0.97 Acres) -: Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land 'Value: 2005 - $84r000, 2006 - $140,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 - $147,000, 2006 - $109,000 -1 Administrative District Info Cornmur ity Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 (403) Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS zone: 342 ($3,765) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Sewer System: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowici Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Page 1 of 2 Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tenzing Thinley -t sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas_ Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Said Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: Conservation Flow Water Quality: Basic Water Quality Treatment Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None Page 2 of 2 KingCounty DDES Permit Information Report This report was generated: 6/18/2007 1:07,39 PM Parcel Number: 6196600100 The Information included in this report has been compiled by King County Staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, time`aess, or rights to the use or such information. King County shaft not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained in this report. Any sale of this report or information on this report is prohibited except by written permission of King County. E9400232 ENFORCE CLOSED ACCUMULATION OF JUNK VEHICLES 61966CO100 FREILINGER NINA 2/22/1994 E0000531 ENFORCE CLOSED 6196600100 6/6/2006 ES0710012 INSPDEMO ISSUED DEMO INSPECTION A07PM196 PREAPP-M PENDING LISSAK PRE -AP 6196600100 LISSAK MAX 1/17/2007 6196600100 LISSAK MAX 6/4/20D7 Page Iof1 Page 1 of 4 kg KingCounty By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Tip: Use the Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report to see more sales records details Sale Date 11/9/2006 Sale Ptice $0 Seller Name BAKHCHINYAN KARINA Buyer Name LISSAK MAXIM Sale Date 11/9/2006 Seller Name FREILINGER NINA Buyer Name BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE Sale Date 11/9/2006 Seller Name BOGOLYUBOV ROZANNA Buyer Name BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTIN Sale Date 11/9/2006 Seller Name ROTSTEIN OLGA Buyer Name ROTSTEIN EDWARD Sale Price $495,000 sale Price;:$0 Sale Tice:50 Assessor Parcel Records. District Name KING COUNTY Property Name Propel RESIDENTIAL Page 2 of 4 Plat Name NORTHWESTERN GARDEN Present Single Family (Res TRACTS DIV NO.01 Use Use/Zone) V�Vater VV�T1�R Plat Block 1 D1STF€ICT Sy NOR Plat Lot 5�f <. 4TIA System Lot Area 42,447 SgFt (0.97 acres) ,r'es Pi`l0,L10, SectionFrownship/Range NW 33 23 5 Meet i� t Account Number 619660010007 Legal Description 5 1 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV # 1 Assessor Residential Building Records: Address Building Grade Condition Year Built Year Renovated Total Living SgFt 1 st Floor SgFt Half Floor SgFt 2nd Floor SgFt Upper Floor SgFt Total Basement SgFt Total Finished Basement SgFt Finished Basement Grade Daylight Basement Heat System Heat Source Address Building Grade Condition Year Built Year Renovated ........... Total Living SgFt 1st Floor SgFt Half Floor SgFt 2nd Floor SgFt 17804 116TH AVE SE 98058 Fair Average Bcdoems 2 . 1925 at: �I 0 1I2 Batfi�s 840 a14 Baths; 0 840 Sanes 1 0 Single 'Storyreplace ti 0 Multi St+.ry Fireplace 0 0 Free Standing 0 Fireplace 0 Basement Garage.8gFt 0 0 Attached Garage SgFt 0 NONE OR Open Porch SgFt 80 UNKNOWN Enclosed P6reh Bs�Ft 4Q Elec BB DeckgFfi 0 Electricity Percent Brrck Stone 0 Low - �; Fair B'droorris 3 1949 EshS 1 0 1� Bathsl `' 0 1010 3f4 Batts 0 . 1010 hones 1 0 Single SFary Fireplace i._ 0 0 Multi Story Frr lace 0 Page 3 of 4 Upper Floor SgFt 0 Total Basement SgFt 0 Total Finished Basement 0 SgFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR UNKNOWN ........................................ . Daylight Basement Heat System Elec BB Electricity and Solar Heat Source Address Building Grade Condition Year Built Year Renovated Total Living SgFt 1 st Floor Sq Ft Half Floor SgFt 2nd Floor SgFt Upper Floor SgFt 17802 116TH AVE SE 98058 Fair Fair ....... ... 1926 ..... ...x:,:u 0 '[ 1490/ 9401 Total Basement SgFt Total Finished Basement Sq Ft 550 Sini 0 Allul 0 1=re Fire 0 BaE 0 Finished Basement Grade NONE OR Q UNKNOWN Daylight Basement E Heat System Elec BB G Heat Source Electricity P This report was generated: 6/1812007 1:08:13 PM .��. atory Or 1461b.. ,' 0 Stan tngr 0 merit ��r�gtK �q{=t Q hedGage SgFi 0 Porch StlFt .. '. .0 �sed'Porch SgFt 0 Sq 0 ant Bnckc Stone 0 Related on-line reports: Kink County GI& Property information FAQ King County Assessor. Submit a request to correct this information DDES: Permit Applications Repori King County: Districts and Development Conditions Report King County Assessor; eReal Pro erty_Report (PDF format requires Acrobat King County Assessor: Quarter Section Map Report P( DF format. requires Acrobat) King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report Recorders Office: Scanned images of plats, surveys an other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: III KING COUNTY DEPAPTIVIENT of ASSESSMENTS A- DI W NO 2 ------------- NW 33-23-05 —27 0 9 c� ----- S.C.-$ ---- 8 - N 6d.e: sE I iSb7i cf 9�71 H 8b-39-:C w 114 REV- 0 70 5F 09Le ��J 1 135 �4� S.E. PETROVITSKY ROAD M � S.E.76THr .7,dT _s.c.ba crss-y va'. 9;aa6 ST. 21 - JOI.B. 90 90.57 - 1�1.63 ;G I 17 �ilSG `0024 I� IGI I M1 �o 27sa1 ;52d6 ��6156{ 125&Si � j�� ` ' li5 007.0 L, 99 0= ow...9..�.i7 03W � Ib} a.. I !ry II 2 f 1 67 i�s2�f 36 'I;!.i TR. A Uh.^ iAi 57, '!le I.S0.' I KC.SP.877188 f=of- 12 — 14 0062 KC Sf? 1283045 8407030842 7712220667 _ t �I 1896f{ SSE3� f� ?I;c9i 21219,E I ;b 51 1„ _ ;o Ite owl 1565 0325 s 4012e175i: 5-67 aC L,}C �_ W3Ci.310:20� 361 3i 9303 a AC NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS 00g4-17 030Q 9211 i KCSP L97SO042 19390920900003 9ji5 Sf _ _ ?-HE 114 INC 1,19112 E W f 14 I{g,BS I,Lh 4,447f f 15U6f h� 010q �—�� Q285 NE W / m � - w a , 9255 9258 4 17'1 — -- i 0120 02$0 PL, doc.77 iac l 7.�5 IQc a f- Preliminary Site Plan Revised 9-21.1999 EL -- 106.0, EL — 106.0' Drainfield Area Allowed sq fit �, Legal Descri tion U1 Lot 2 of King County Short L97SO042 - Recording nun 19990920900003 Maximum B Hight �I Allowed Ref: K.C.C.21 A.12.030 Spa 6'x7' approx. Set on sunken railroad lies 10 ft.'r 48 ft. Garage wl 2nd a' x 4� ; story -- - - - - , 1"Inp I I Septic O I Tank & pn.p.,.d Park" Am Z � —49 ft. 58 ft. °, t IPumpmotor I ______________ L- - - - - - I k] j 15 x T pampa doa ------------------ -------..................... - ----------------- - Driveway w I" I �`°°°`°d"`�`�" i Roof Drainage Infiltration 1 B' wide � tea,. a x x, hs EnVyasy dock a alsh 47 x +s-,Na:i asaranca W 'r I Area I I I :.------ ---------------------------------------- -- --•-----...----............... 141 ft. L — 104.0' 11 Sth Ave SE (203 feet to centerline) Joint Use Driveway Tract -20 ft.-->• Site was cleared an undeterminable number of years ago (204) Elevation of lowest floor level -- 105.0' Impervious Surface House Garage Driveway Decks A/C Unit Spa Lot 1 of Ki 43 x 50 = 2150 32 x 25 = B00 35 x 18 = 630 9 x 16 144 3 x 4 12 3 x 3 9 5 x 7 35 ; u1 ELM10 i ATTENTION MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK g County Short Plat 97S0EET * I INTERIOR f *MEASUREMENT ALONG CENTER LIME OF DRIVEWAY TO FACE OF GARAGI CARPORT OR OTHER F D PARK10C AREA I t I REFER TO K.C.C.21A.12.170 FOR Ai.LOWABLP PROJECTIONS iNT T q %faldlflED S1ETBAdKS Total. 3780 0 Dias 17809118th Avenue SE Renton WA 98058 Site plans I" . 1000 gallon pump tank - - - Water Line Scale: 1 • - 2a p p 1000 gallon septic tank -++ i l 4" PVC Tightline . . . . . ��. ) j . ,r,. -- SJ<. E6 t..�� % C / • ITT S pdFV cszraH ra . - E r hio vR�� cr _.. _sMEer Mn. WWSN 5-0897 /iJ �/8 a � L....�___ D. .SW=SiYd � I ''�� SE�S6(/� ° 1A Ta�; tI G/yuFi N. s{rda I Ebyrrza. r erbwn Jcn d G tiara n ' I A. T"un,(• fa'c. r. P. NG,+rarr I � /,. • . � - a ; � � -c ' l&�' >�b'i rAriLr:5J7 Na. rd � lNc: � 0 l� /.S /F� /.$ J'i4F // { G R r7 11�J i qlr a k N 169,413 P �_ a :� -- - -- -- - ---- - - - - - - - -- - ------ - - - -- -- - - -- - _ ... - �LL 0 ' 32 j w >'axrf Gkn W.A7ria2w I I 1 irJof,., „yam kov' 1 la-HJ<frrinr GYnyl ` ! II I J 2 3 s � AlE MeY _:r �, It ADOPTED BY THE &OARD OF XIWO COUNTY COMMIS$10NER1 5TA r9» 98 av r:. T sen'rr�e. wn9 _...... ..._..... s r -d!' Or°.12' L[et/L- PlPf : ! 8/SfX TYPE �A • 7 : � : .. :!' ' • !r - - STA 21rr5 oN 576 2r; G5 0,V r2r. 3-•oF 12' Conk Pr• z + 5ME9.30 OV LT. I�ENH4'^,-E.- !✓yYdlV�S!� .. .. :- 14 D P ETA 25f75 ON RT 1`OF- /7ca-vC. G'OF !2 rLisK' S re. ,3rp.f65 70 sTd- 3SY50,VV R,.. l �a•a' �- OIs' RT OF 24' cz., T f ff R�-I'VF l J2, GBnC. yo -PF y` Cdrrc. L'tFLY. F'rcE'. - 57A, JOlw3 a1v LT 2fi"nP' 2s7'C.�ASS � RrRrMF.. S:O. 3L='AA3`/;t'; - � 5>.C.1far53 D.✓ RT cailT GULN. P/PE i$' OF 24"!cASS Rtr�F. 52' 6>= /ZR GOh� LXfI'Y F`/f E. caNc.ru�r �/vim, 57e 2. r Td 77 o cM Rr. . sra. ast8 tT. h F ' d. C! /.5`TPA'%�I� d 1 c, / J'5. $'aFrB'rCfA957t rQcrvx` 'f ve. cMil P/P& r SS F lXF - KING COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1MA,ETER F. WOMRS, COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER P4'TROWTSKY ROAD 108 m'.AVE• 5f: 70 /56 i4ilE.5 �. ' SURVEY Ro_.�57-�.,�-.:sfL__. COUNTY ROhO FROdkCT Ro�_..,_ SHEET., S.-or-/S- SH£E75 6 htE.� WINrr ��1 -All Hox �wcx=}R��S YE ,ANC H.-:ot,. yiT Sk �S,•'JY C4A0.ME$$10 NER.'S DiS 7R[L7 Nd. �. - _ �7 -yam -�r�--• a �w ' �M .SE. C ei Prsch L3Al. S ..fr iF O c/r p ,s ie - GL k".41P'!Nd t` ` 6R1%881NG. ,G U.IafP SUR9 , RDAL7�WA Y SECT/ON A Q l■T 3FAPPA.' 41: - '.,gip-:APPR 4r .. .. ,PM A'PX�LT A6WY..F.G"'�Y 3'f�CUr'YU.3, rR CR SURF, rY9P L'4dLpf'vFPY7 SliRF. rAl� GDU,Q,SE T fays CA, p/"!.' T4f ct;rr>F'3E lli ... ,s.Gtr EA9fL4lL'.klYE,V 15Cll Ytu : ��a- ,QORDWRY t"WCA +f 'z LT _ 1 ASPiN.'LT- CA4'C.PE7EtYH IDTon/5 AR�R GR.SU,PFTOP1COlIRSE STOATS : .F17..4 L. (-4SURFTOP ritl,2sFI S?OH t0.5 4T P. RP Wj P' AFPR. 7 r - -"� c'.4 SY/Rf; roP LY RTF TtWS- CR._fYIEF. raP Ca<'1.PS,E'srmM1`s a C.s: su, F res> CGYI.f'S`E STnNS .QO.aPP.4.. ,L C. SURF' TOP G?nIlRSE 5ri4Y8 L:B SGlRF. TOP CGVlc'SE. sic1Y1 ,E'O eA'SJFF 7VP LY+!/.P9Es MS +1p: "..: - .e.-�.-,. �... \. h 4r R,A'AoOR. GY. L.P. 3"URF TOP t0U!c:iE 5T4NS �. `'.. $ Lr •PG .4pPh! Lr•. Rliaa'awv fGtN:, fn6Yl.YA3 :PP AT�i'P LX CC. SU,PF TDA ['tl(i,ESE STgrKS �� � Y '^-~.,``!���- `_ h: iiF CR.SY/.PF ria' Fs7b'Ar .. .(� u �. ., G'FSU,PF l�v crXr, SE Si7hMS $:.CP.SrrRF mr, s'& STONS . .6'RA;AY1" L.T. Cr 4RONA SIF5 YNSeg 2fTG caSeIR' roJ o. pfo rY "%W. �i h Q se s nz s '1 � _ i - foo �r �+`f14� .. \ .'...� � -...- ...� � � .._- .. ` �U 95 - � ... ����_- --- •tea\\ EAlB. •j"CG'NDS -R'a � � ' '�� y�o � � � ` � N r� . .eg APPN jjj RT C!/Yos .. s5 t� •_,� nP.sf�t•'JmP.,teS,E ,dYG�s• ,P1r.,Rarr, cr, � =/NSANK.d/ENr 24ClrYOs. A �. .... � N � e P 4 .. ` `: P Try ¢ . roP CoUzesT S rOA/5 R 6 j=�^ _. -'. fr! �.J!: c'.0 SViPFTtEA .5E 5'TOXS _ :. ... M •�} 1 .x � Ll APAM 4F Q "r�i -�a CVUPS .. ..... JCJ ,� ,C'OdBWRY E`X[a nr. �!r TGUYAS. - - 0 q °j trl � `a GR: �70.°['pe'RS¢.SSpvS m q e'e F /q r'Z C 'uP�'M � )-OAQr pF CR srieF, iOPL[iF 5TOu5 !': - � 4 AS,6lVALT CrruCRETE. GL.614 TONS- AA., 4%, - .,. II .57lRF.T1'1P17A'fRSE STONS �c - GF_SV.r7F. TCPCOriRS,E5Tc7y$ -06c .Aare 3,a NO% - ,pp. APPR. L{. a GUlOE POSTS TYPE`. Ro-APPH Rr RAO ® FZfV �/VA6 .. .. ,tm. APPN.-I rar c e. srlai lvr cw1sE s rotes -Fi99 -G ONLY ON LEFT '� En1B.�WX+t�ENT .S LY/YOs, ONOW47`,5V ARE .4�` �UJ1T ' ToW 7■� CR. swm.. TOP C011ReE STr34S a .. e F1D.4PPR. Rr, W - rPP. APAP RT � ... .... ....:.. cr25U,2F. '-oe;oSE f?vhl$ Y - GP.SURF, IYWLYXr�r+e STtM`S �•MEAXXrVi--NT- S'.cY! rb,S:F ,rss. s� rR Selo,, rd" GOURS--: J7 M4'S _ � .. _ _ _ E ,rf E FO.SY,S YYPIBM - sT..BPA,F: .PvdOi9AY EX2'rt✓.. � lSaryLi3. ... '..: .. _ __. .. •a ON Y dli! '�JGfrT L '•. - CR SURF.TORCn1JRSPlS ASPli94L7,. GUhL'AETf CL, d. IP.TOrVs - CRSrfr�� rev Cau:Qsf s7,6w$ f/AUL see S:fiEE•T /O C74 r7dt� 7-4f Cdl YG.. BC7 e8C3if/ i/ 3 CW- V'9.51. Bd L�RpIY AF 04 yv$? ' � CAOW.tY-Xc41454710N - /-4Esc9 cu YES ROADWAY �XCAil�17'rON .. !/SS CU. Yes. �l4oADty4Y �:1`CAVi47ION - /40.7 G , �i' S. EA9£3lFi/YfiAd NT /77 Cu. YL?5 ZXBAAIYA45NT -._._.-__ 124.9 Gel. YD-5 E'/»BANA-M--Nr .9G2 cel Y475. O'f, L! d� 23 rP4 2s Z6 37 - 26 .. drro 33 .3r 3S 3F ,37 38 33 4',4 42. Soil Map —King County Area, Washington N Meters 0 20 40 AO 124 Fee[ 6 so 100 200 300 USIM Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 11171200E Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 J A07PM196 ARTERIALS /�/ 5lraets PRINCI ?? water aoa es APWI AM M IF Parcels r" 0 Cibes I I I ilk Eel Plot date: Jun 1& 2007:llddes001)Alk iaWy dev\ptojedslbase2.apr IC i N G C O U N T Y ois '—.01 W"srI: 0' T r g, T WE I I k* ..... ... . ....... ... . .......... .... ........... lik 4kig�jp. NO: Iz w "All vul" 4 MA S I K I N G C 0 U N T Y A07PM1 96 WYDR*I/GFIGI 6- m M I� LAA�- A07PM 19 1_ ZONING % l- ❑ NAL _ slSchoal Facilities 7j Yee s _o► ¢ _�, � -� - , 1- ;-r /V Urban Growth Arm Line streets -"i Alf w J Water Bodies .LIL �p •,� / f I Road Rights -of -Way Parcels Parks C arIIT�H ST = J_ j l 1 J Zoning ` - ,agricultural, one DU per 10 acres A-35 - Agncullue U r 35 acres J _,�. _l l i I l _ - _ SE PETRQY - + i f . RAr2 Forest Rural Arm, one DU 5 acres - -- - j 1 r-... _..� - - P� R.A-rS -Rural Area, one DU per 5 acres RA-10 - Rural Area, one DU per 10 apes UR - Urban Reserve, orre DU per 5 acres �- R-1 -Residential, one DU per acre R-4 - Residential, 4 DU per a/re R-6 - Residential, ti DU per acre RA- Resident. 8 DU per acre R-12 - Residential, 1 2 DU per ape R-18 - Residential, 18 DU per acre L i R,24 - Residential, 24 DU per acre -- - - `M R-48- Residential, 48 DU per acre NB - Neighborhood Business CB -Community Business -: ROBRegional Businoss r --� ._. offica I - lndustlial KIM z 4 0 500 1000 Feet r i"= 1000 feel 1 King County ;' me �rmorma,ion ir�cd.d «� wa mre ne. been �mdied by King County ataH frarn a varMly of sowras ap Is aubjecl m change w.ttnrII rotloa. qna Carry meYas rn representahum or wenantkw mpl d, m m7+e racy. -nV Wt nma, tr e6 eas. or EOM to me use or such intonnahm. K. Courrly Wh r t be Marla ror arty ganerd. speGel, in&w. inddental, e, anrsepua w damages Indud ng, bl rat - IxaP,ts resuYJng from the uselmortmseua. eaotf w Ioont -� --shed On thla map. My sale ul this map or Int.—a - on fts map Is pratiibded e.capt by wrmen pwrrgm an of QQ Yr \fit,✓ county. Plot date: Jun la, 2007; iiddes0014x01}glslaY dev4projeCtsYbase2.alx '\�� 1 Fi I 005 SWDM Streets BASII Water Bodies Parcels I Landslide Hazard Dranagge Areas (2004) II Landslide Hazard Drainage Landslide Hazard Area Flow Control (2004} -� -- f�' a/ Basis Flow Conservation Flow FloodJ = C[ties 105 Problem Flow Plis 0 400 Feel l"= 500 foot IgK1119 County V�,on The irAormalion included this map has been oosnplied py King Co.imy start from a —y of smuws araf Is s� to ct—gs wtef rrobw. loreoun Cty makes rro reprasent'dt — or wam b". express or impl''ed, as tothe atwrery, mmpieleness, timeliness, or rights to Ca uce of eclal, such inronnatlon- King CoinN shall rot be r�ewe firany jar", epindirect, iW Liana, Or C4neequenbal damages Induding, but rwt limited to, lost ra�enues or 1-1 proths rasutlirrg from the use or mIs— of tdormetion he Ir cwrcained on IN. W. Any sale of this map or infoimabon on UNs map Is praNGhed except byw fti permission of King Ca-tty. Plot dale: Jun 18, 2007; Uddes001141%gis%v_deA"jectstbase2.apr -` , - .- ` -` L % u 1♦4- 1,-1♦1 }1 1— F- I I It r '♦t T I i t l 1 —111ti 1 r �, 1 1' I �f`I I� I� I I � ♦ _d 1 11' i I �t \ ` I I I,1 Awl i I I, / ♦ f PL A07PM 196 CAO .�*- �1 1 * • Water Course (W LR) Sheets -:: Water Bodies 1 1 1 \ Critical Area Resignation ` yl� Wildlife Habitat Canservabw Areas (20M) Area of Potential Wetland Influence (2004) 1 Parcwls - : Aquatic Areas Buffer (2004) CAGcaI Aquifer Recharge Areas (2004) 1• 1 2 / — 3 1 4 i L Basin Gandhian (2004) -- •M High \ \ Medium LOW P► � V-,♦ I 1 ,I � *,t•— I � i 1 T *I 1-) 41 r I L 1"1 1 4 V L L i ♦ \ \ a 400 Feet y / I 1'= 500 feet kg "CO. tty w I i\I� i h++l♦ y / • The mrtotrnatlon included m thts map nos naen oompled by • / — — / * / \ — cii County a rr a variety of source- and Ia subf act !a gs without rotlne m- qN C—ry mama ro I I l 11 ` lI 1 E I I pr-.tau.m or wat tkmi. eV— or imp Md. as to the a wavy, mmpe cress. uma lnasa, o-hgnts iathe use of inrnmoadon- Kng County he Ratio for ♦ ; such shoo ro. any general, -pedal, Ind,red, —dental, m cm equa W 'a—a,nvt,dng, bm rot W d m, 1-t —ra,ea °deal —1• — I lk I r 1 ' profit mauiire Smm the w w ml— al the infamteRan ` / \; conGirwd onihia ntap, Ferry -ale al the map err inrom b- . ,.. _ �„ an this map is wahibd d except by written pemoeeton of K g rnm Plat date: Jun 18, 2007; %kddes0011x01 igistav_devtprojactsibase2.apr J:31f, �,ee- A07PM196 ' 2005 PHOTO Township ilnes • • S-T-R r .�L QSLJNES w '� SECLINES ' \ / TWPLINES W albar Bodies Parcels -- — .... __ .... Ciles r - ts 4 i I W-ti u_ a so 100 Feat 1"= 100 teat King County The irdormabon b Juded on Inis map has been ro plod by Kirg County staff from a variety d sowws and �s subject to chtenge swUwtd ratice. King County mobs. na »prasentalions dr wafantle., e*n— of Implied, m to the accuracy, wrrpleteness, umallnasa. a rlgh" to me u.a d such lnfwmetmn. Kir® Cowrry shall not be Ilebla tw arpr general. special. Indl—t irrida W. or pens —fdal damdgee Inducting. but not limped, I— revenues or lost pro. resiiling from the use w misuse or the Inform dw w —rained on this map. Any cele of tNc map or Information on M map to proNbited ezoept by wrtdett pamlea,oh of KIng r C—ty. Plat data: Jun 18, 2007;%lddesa011xd11gistav_deviprojectslba5a2,apr A07PM 196 2005 PHOTO G 400 Feel 1'= 500feet 71te Ir>f4mWe included m this map has been t' mpiied t y I .S Cmsey is f horn a vatety of b011rC-0a and is eubje& to changs wtt—f mbcs. Nng Caenty makes m U a-warantes, ezpro or Implied, es t, theyes,acmrstZ wmPlelenesa. Ilmeli ssa. or nghta to the ewe a! s.rd, irrfw-matm King County Mail not be liable tar arry generd�, spacial, nsiliM, Irdtlen781, or mruaquenOsn damages intldi ung, bul mt iimtled t%lost re<rr a loll profits maulery b use e or misppe of the informs cane nee on Ws map_ "eels d ma ttp. p a mf—b— on Nis map md is pmttlblaccept by wrltan permission of larg tk I county_ ,plot dato_ Iun l8, 2007; lltltlsS001UN11giS1Sv deJlp[ojedstbase2-apf L07SO079 001.jpg L07SO079 002.jpg L07SO079 003.jpg L07SO079 004.jpg L07SO079 005.jpg mills i L0780079 006.jpg L07SO079 007.jpg L0730079 008.jpg L07SO079 009.jpg L07SO079 010.jpg - i�' M 7 L07SO079 011,jpg L0780079 012,jpg L07SO079 013,jpg L07SO079 014.jpg L07SO079 015.jpg i F L07SO079 016.jpg L07SO079 017 jpg L07SO079 018.jpg L0760079 019 jpg L07SO079 020.jpg kid L07SO079 021,jpg L07SO079 022.jpg L07SO079 023.jpg L07SO079 024.jpg L0780079 025.jpg big i i i L07SO079 026.jpg L07SO079 027.jpg L07SO079 028.jpg L07SO079 029.jpg L07SO079 030 jpg gag L07S0079 031.jpg L07S0079 032.jpg L07SO079 033.jpg L07SO079 034.jpg L07SO079 035.jpg L07SO079 036.jpg L07SO079 041.jpg Af L07SO079 037.jpg L07SO079 042.jpg L07SO079 038.jpg L0750079 043.jpg L0780079 046.jpg L07SO079 047.jpg L07S0079 048.jpg L07SO079 039.1pg n u L07SO079 044.jpg L07SO079 040.jpg L07SO079 045.jpg I W `> � I I FF � ,A y r...`1:7 b r r Zr l .l K � R Y, 11 �F F I 0 -AN . w . ` ��*. _ Y ��.. � � � ��� �' ' �� �'�� �,.. �``�" �„ �,� �. - �' :�� > � . �� �.' �, ._/ .,mq ,. J� � w � �.' �M � IYr� _ � it q ■ y, � c :� �, ��, �� �` ~ F � c .. .,. .c _ I ,,a ,_. ., z .x ;. - h n —.< - ;'. ___. . , •: - -� �! � ...mJ' �+$aka T �_�+iM :. i yam iTnL�.Ts �� py�� ,� F` r, � a `� .. ti `• '� .. � � p.S aA: � � Fj ,�/�y a`/�: a _ ,. �. ...... ,_ r �y i R k a� as a ` � � i '4 !' r i a R �cy � �' a. }�, I jr w /` c '_ ' � .. �@ "'"'- �, � � �� �, ,, �� :a" ,:� � .. � _ — � a y����� �� � 4. ,. ,� i, +17!i. t� ...1;'�ff ...rim � �.� .ryr ,/� s...... .. .. �, I S• ,.. o�. °` .-, � ��: