HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090911_DQInspector's Daily Report
Project Name Date Shift
Sheet 1 of 3 day
Weather
AM PM
Inspector IDR Report #
No. No.
11
1 Foreman with CDB 8
43
2
2
2
1 650J John Deere Dozer
1
2
1
1
Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File:
Inspector's Shift Hours
From:
To:Inspector's Signature
Reviewed By
Laborer with CTI
September 11, 2009
September 11, 2009
Daniel Quehl
7:00 PM
Acceptable
Date
6:00 AM
Date
EX 450 Hitachi Excavators
Location Structure#/Station
Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note
Flaggers
sunny , hi 86 low 72
Daniel Quehl 20090911 DQ
Operators with CDB
Laborers wih CDB
General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI
Operators with CTI
350P John Deere offroad dump trucks
D6 Cat Dozer
Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller
IDR Sheet
Item Number Material / Item Description
Major Equipment on Project
CDB Number & Classification
EX 270LC Hitachi Excavator
RC40 Komatsu small excavator
Subcontractor Number & Classification
Plan SheetItem Quanity
I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening
and SR515 Interchange Project
sunny , hi 72 low 59
Traffic Control
ReviewedSigns Barricades
2
Inspector's Daily Report
Project Number
Sheet 2 of 3
Inspector IDR Report #
IDR Sheet
Daniel Quehl
I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening
and SR515 Interchange Project
Inspector's Notes
September 11, 2009
Date
20090911 DQ
Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site:
Attended the CDB morning meeting at 6:30am.
Performed observation and soil density testing on common borrow placed over SF-55 and SF-20 Geogrid
reinforcing from stations 11+50 to 15+95.
Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear
density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 117.0 with a 12.1% optimum moisture was
used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor
was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and
locations.
The common borrow being used was located on the north end of the site and had been transported by the
conveyor belt and stockpiled on a previous day.
The conveyor belt was not in operation today but the subcontractor was adding the belt extension that had
arrived today.
While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 11+50 to 15+95 the following was verified:
1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged.
2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs
3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to 2'
spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches.
4. A total of 39 rolls of SF-55 were placed today.
5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift.
6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed.
7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun.
The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 1 lift of fill over the Geogrid Reinforcing from a total of 17 truck loads for
a total of 500 cubic yards finishing to elevation 188.
Performed observation as 84 truck loads for a total of 2,225 cubic yards of unsuitable material was placed along
the 2:1 slope between the ditchline and Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+00 to 15+95 preparing slope for top
soil and hydroseeding. This material was being transported from the stockpile located on the northeast corner of
the site.
Visited by Bob Pyle compliance inspector with WSDOT, Chad Webley Field Eng. with CDB, and
AlexZimmerman with CSI Geosynthetics to see the progress of the project
Observed the 350P offroad dump truck driving over the compacted areas throughout the day with
appearing to have no deflection or yielding.
Today's activities listed for CDB at the Benson Bulb Out:
Performed observation and soil denstiy testing on common borrow being placed southwest of the Benson
Inspector's Daily Report
Project Number
Sheet 3 of 3
Inspector IDR Report #
Inspector's Notes
I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening
and SR515 Interchange Project September 11, 2009
Daniel Quehl
IDR Sheet Date
20090911 DQ
Performed soil density testing at above location per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear
density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 117.0 with a 12.1% optimum moisture was
used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests met the 95% required compaction. The contractor
was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and
locations.
Personal used on the Defoor site:
1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB
2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI
3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI
4.Rich Park -Operator with CTI
5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI
6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI
7.Kim Bowen-Operator with CTI
8.Leo Dunn-Laborer /Operator with CTI
9. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI
10.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI
11.Stoney Kuck-Operator with CDB
12. Bill Smith-Operator/Laborer with CTI
13. Jeremiah Perez-Foreman with CDB
14. Dean-Operator with CDB
15. Tom Kelly-Operator with CDB
16. Jesus-Laborer with CDB
17. Jeff Harrison-Operator with CDB
18. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB
Equipment used on the Defoor site:
1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks
2.Two EX450 Hitachi Excavators
3. EX270LC Hitachi Excavator
4. Two D6 Cat Dozers
5.Dynapac 16 Ton Vibratory Roller
6.650J John Deere Dozer
7.Water Truck
8. RC40 Komatsu small trackhoe
Personal present at the Benson Bulb Out:
1.Foreman with CDB
2.Four operators with CDB
3.Three laborers with CDB
4. Two flaggers
Page of122.9****126.8126.3124.710.3Average12.111711712.1AverageDepth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)9911.51179620Tan silty sand with trace of oversize117MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)9.79.5ASTM D 693812.1Test #11a22a-45'below finishgrde-45'below finishgrdeAt finish grdeAt finish grdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 70' east of ditchline at station 12+80Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 2Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton vibe roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 9.5QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 70' east of ditchline at station 12+80Fill at the Benson Bulb Out 10' west of Benson road at station 31+50Fill at the Benson Bulb Out 10' west of Benson road at station 31+50Project No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T9911Date: 9/11/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTTan silty sand with trace of oversize1a 115.3In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:115.6115.3111.8111.4OMC %12.120225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08
Project #:Date: 9/11/2009
Project :20
Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310
123
11+50 to 15+95 28+00 to 34+06
T-09082-24 T-09082-24
12+80 31+50
N/A N/A
Common Common
-45 Finish Grade
0 degrees 115.6 111.8
90 degrees 115.3 111.4
average 115.5 111.6 #VALUE!
0 degrees 9.7 11.5
90 degrees 9.5 10.3
average 9.6 10.9 #VALUE!
9.49 10.13
0.00 0.00
9.49 10.13 #VALUE!
0.30 0.07
0.00 0.00
0.30 0.07 #VALUE!
3 1 #VALUE!
96.82 99.28 #VALUE!
117.0 117.0
98.7 95.4 #VALUE!
12.1 12.1
12.1 12.1
12.1 12.1 #VALUE!
Test Hole Number
Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615)
Moisture Density Curve #
Test Station
Station to Station
Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99
Reviewed By:
Comments:
Daniel Quehl
WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #:
Average Moisture Content
Reference to Centerline
Moisture Content
Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft.
Gauge Readings
Material Type
Depth of Material
Dry Density lbs/cu.ft.
Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100
(6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained)
Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99
Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100
Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table)
(1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare
(2) Mass of Tare A
T-09082
(7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report)
(8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report)
(5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample
Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2)
(3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare
(4) Mass of Tare B
Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4)
Gradation Determination