The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090917_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 2 Laborer with CDB 8 23 1 2 2 Flaggers 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Signs Barricades x I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project partly cloudy, hi 60 low 68 Traffic Control x Reviewed Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator water truck General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks D6 Cat dozer Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller partly cloudy, hi 71 low 68 Daniel Quehl 20090917 DQ Operator with CDB Foreman with CDB Surveyors with CDB Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers EX 450 Hitachi excavators Location Structure#/Station Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date 7:00 PM (TR 9.21.09) Laborer with CTI September 17, 2009 September 17, 2009 Daniel Quehl Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # 20090917 DQ September 17, 2009 DateIDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's NotesToday' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the weekly CDB safety meeting at 6:30am. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragird 3XT and SF-20 Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+75 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 114.5 with a 12.9% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-26. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. The conveyor belt transported a total 4598 cubic yards of common borrow today to the site from a total of 209 truck loads. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+75 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 3 1/2 rolls of SF-20 and 45 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. CTI placed a total of 2 lifts of fill over the Geogrid Reinforcing from a total of 171 truck loads for a total of 4275 cubic yards completing elevations 198 and 199. The Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 197 was inspected this morning after installation and elevation 199 had not been placed yet so this inspection will take place tomorrow. Visited by Rod Blalock compliance inspector with WSDOT throughout the day. Rick Johnson the materials technician with WSDOT performed a soil density test per T310 and obtained a sample per SOP 615. CDB placed Layfield LP315 filter fabric and quarry spalls along the ditchline at bottom of 2:1 slope at stations 10+00 and 15+95. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Date 20090917 DQ Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 17, 2009 Daniel Quehl Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Will Fletland -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer /Operator with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Operator with CTI 13. Ken Hashon-Operator with CTI 14. Dave Dover-Foreman with CDB 15. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 16. Jesus-Laborer with CDB 17. Chris Qrena-Laborer with CDB 18. Josh Taylor-Surveyor with CDB 19. Eric Johnson-Surveyor with CDB 20. Allan Osborn-Operator with CDB 21. Two Flaggers Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator 4. Two D6 Cat dozers 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck Page ofAverage****12.9*10.5124.7112.3122.3124.3125.2LaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)-38'below finishgrde-38'below finishgrde114.5Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionBackscatter / Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)*11.7 113.19711.0 *125.5Average9812.4114.5114.5 12.911.720Tan silty sand with trace of oversize114.5MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)10.110.3ASTM D 693812.9Test #11a23a2a34*122.712312.94aFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 85'east of ditchline at station 12+45114.5109.911.3-34'below finishgrde-34'below finishgrde-37'below finishgrde-37'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 85'east of ditchline at station 12+45Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 15+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 14+50Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 4Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 11.7QC Sample:Test No.:Direct Transmission-33below finishgrdeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 15+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 65' east of ditchline at station 12+40Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 65' east of ditchline at station 12+40Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 14+50Direct TransmissionDirect Transmission124.1Direct Transmission12.9*118.2*118.2114.5*11.7Project No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversize21Date: 9/17/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTTan silty sand with trace of oversizeAverage11.6-33below finishgrdeTan silty sand with trace of oversize2a 111.695*110.5In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:111.1112.7111.4111.6OMC %12.920225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Page ofProject:Inspector:OMC %In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT22Date: 9/17/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99*See Attached Density Work Sheets for test #'s 1 thru 4Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton vibe roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density:QC Sample:Test No.:Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments:LocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTest #20MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)AverageASTM D 6938Compaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Depth or Elevation (feet)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)9720225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/17/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+75 to 15+95 10+75 to 15+95 10+75 to 15+95 T-09082-26 T-09082-26 T-09082-26 15+30 12+40 14+50 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -38 -34 -37 0 degrees 111.1 111.4 112.3 90 degrees 112.7 111.6 113.1 average 111.9 111.5 112.7 0 degrees 10.1 12.4 10.5 90 degrees 10.3 11.7 11.0 average 10.2 12.1 10.8 12.18 12.62 11.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.18 12.62 11.71 0.34 0.50 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.50 1.15 3410 97.25 96.02 90.16 114.5 114.5 118.2 97.7 97.4 95.3 12.9 12.9 11.7 12.9 12.9 11.7 12.9 12.9 11.7 Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Reviewed By: Comments: Project #:Date: 9/17/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 4 10+75 to 15+95 T-09082-26 12+45 N/A Common -33 0 degrees 109.9 90 degrees 110.5 average 110.2 0.0 0.0 0 degrees 11.6 90 degrees 11.3 average 11.5 0.0 0.0 11.79 0.00 11.79 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 96.54 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 114.5 96.2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 12.9 12.9 12.9 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Thomas B Robinson Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4)