Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090922_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 6 13 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today? Yes x No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Laborers with CTI September 22, 2009 September 22, 2009 Daniel Quehl 7:30 PM (TR 9.24.09) Acceptable Date 11:30 AM Date EX 450 Hitachi excavators Location Structure#/Station Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers sunny, hi 85 low 70 Daniel Quehl 20090922 DQ Operator with CDB General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 350P John Deere offroad dump truck(1 idle 1/2 day) D6 Cat dozers Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator with hoepack water truck Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project sunny, hi 70 low 56 Traffic Control ReviewedSigns Barricades Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes September 22, 2009 Date 20090922 DQ Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Relieved Mayes inspector Tim Berstrom to perform observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-20 Geogrid reinforcing and area east of Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 117.0 with a 12.1% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 49 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevations 205 was completed with installation and inspection of the Primary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. Fill was placed to elevation 206 from the same station numbers but no Secondary Geogrid reinforcing was placed at this elevation yet. CTI placed a total of 650 cubic yards from a total of 26 truck loads from my arrival until the end of the work day. There was a total of 4,818 cubic yards of common borrow transported today by the conveyor belt from a total of 219 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump trucks driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Was visited by Chad Webley the Field Engineer with CDB, Dave Zimmerman with CDB, and Roch Player the Engineer with CDB to see the progress of the project. Terra Dynamics had completed the installation of the nonwoven coconut matting along the 2:1 slope from elevations 171 to 191 and stations 10+00 to 15+95 at the time of my arrival. Visited by Rod Blalock compliance inspector with WSDOT throughout the day who was notified about the Holding Point at elevation 206. Was informed by Rod Blalock that Rick Johnson the Materials Technician with WSDOT will be performing soil density test tomorrow. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 22, 2009 Daniel Quehl IDR Sheet Date 20090922 DQ Inspector Bergstrom was on site to obtain a Moisture Density Relationship sample Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 12. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 13.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks(1 idle 1/2 day) 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator(idle today) 4. Two D6 Cat dozers 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck Project #:Date: 9/22/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-24 T-09082-24 T-09082-24 15+20 12+00 14+50 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -31 -27 -30 0 degrees 115.5 113.0 113.0 90 degrees 113.2 115.7 112.8 average 114.4 114.4 112.9 0 degrees 11.1 11.2 10.1 90 degrees 11.8 11.4 9.5 average 11.5 11.3 9.8 11.35 11.33 10.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.35 11.33 10.86 1.11 1.05 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.05 0.78 10 9 7 90.22 90.73 92.87 120.5 120.1 119.4 94.9 95.2 94.6 11.0 11.1 11.3 11.0 11.1 11.3 11.0 11.1 11.3 Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Page of*10.1129.0*****128.3126.6125.6123.511.4Average*11.1*120.1*120.5*11.1113.0Average9.5Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)9511.2*120.1*11.3 112.89520Tan silty sand with trace of oversize*120.5MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)11.111.8ASTM D 6938*11Test #11a23a2a3-31'below finishgrde-31'below finishgrde-27'below finishgrde-27'below finishgrde-30'below finishgrde-30'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 15+20Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 60' east of ditchline at station 14+50Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 11.8QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 15+20Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 90' east of ditchline at station 12+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 90' east of ditchline at station 12+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 60' east of ditchline at station 14+50Direct Transmission124.4*119.4*119.4*11.3Project No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversize11Date: 9/22/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlDirect TransmissionMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversize1a 113.295In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:115.5113.2113.0115.7OMC %*1120225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08