The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20091005_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 7 13 2 1 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Signs Barricades I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project sunny, hi 58 low 41 Traffic Control Reviewed Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator(idle 1/2 day) water truck 312C Cat Excavator(idle) General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle) 350P John Deere offroad dump truck D6 Cat dozer(idle 1/2 day) Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller sunny, hi 64 low 58 Daniel Quehl 20091005 DQ Operator with CDB Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers EX 450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle 1/2 day) Location Structure#/Station (Hoepack not used today) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date 7:00 PM TR (10.6.2009) Laborers with CTI 10/05/009 October 5, 2009 Daniel Quehl Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # 20091005 DQ October 5, 2009 DateIDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning activity meeting. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-55 /Miragrid 3XT Geogrid reinforcing(remainder of used rolls being used in place of SF-20 Secondary Geogrid reinforcing) from stations 10+35 to 15+95, and non reinforcing area from stations 14+00 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 113.0 with a 12.6% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-32. The test met the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. There was 42 Rolls of Miragrid 3XT and remainder of the Miragrid 3XT rolls were used in place of SF-20 for Secondary Geogrid reinforcing were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevation 220 was completed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 with installation and inspection of the Secondary Geogrid reinforcing. At elevation 221 the fill was placed and compacted from station numbers 10+35 to 15+95 ,but the Primary Geogrid reinforcing was placed and inspected only from stations 10+35 to 15+50. At elevation 222 fill was placed and compacted over the Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 221 from same previous station numbers. No Secondary Geogrid reinforcing was placed at elevation 222 today. The non reinforcing area between stations 14+00 to 15+95 fill was placed and compacted to elevation 224. CTI placed a total of 2,425 cubic yards of common borrow transported from 97 truck loads. The common borrow was transported to the site by a conveyor belt from the Rolling Hills south of Thunder Creek with a total of 4,642 cubic yards transported today by 211 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump truck and water truck driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Visited by Chad Webley the Field Eng. with CDB,Roch Player the Eng. with CDB, Allan Brown with CDB, Robert Patcheck with CDB, and Mr.Gary Merlino to see the progress of the project. Ken Viren the materials technician with WSDOT performed a soils density test per T310 and obtained a sample per SOP 615. Bob Pyle the compliance inspector with WSDOT visited the site throughout the day. Performed observation as excavation took place to finish grade elevation for the 1.5:1 slope including the ditchline along stations 15+45 to15+95 and the 2:1 slope including the ditchline from stations 10+00 to 10+35. . Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Date 20091005 DQ Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project October 5, 2009 Daniel Quehl The Holding Point was reached at elevation 221 and Ken Viren the Materials Technician with WSDOT along with myself spoke with Kevin Wicklund the Foreman with CTI that all testing had been obtained and that it was alright to continue. Personal present at the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Bill Smith-Laborer /Operator with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 12.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI 13. Leo Dunn-Laborer with CTI Equipment used on the site: 1.350P John Deere offroad dump truck 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle 1/2 today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator (idle 1/2 a day and hoepack not used today) 4.D6 Cat dozer(idle 1/2 day) 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8.312C Cat Excavator (idle today) 9.TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle today) Page of124.0****124.8124.1124.311312.612.6AverageOMC %12.612.8110.1110.7Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)111.5110*9812.9113*98113MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)11.912.8ASTM D 693812.6Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct Transmission22aTest #11a-11'below finishgrde-11'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 110' east of ditchline at station 13+00Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s1 and 2Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller&Hoepack3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 12.8QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 110' east of ditchline at station 13+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 14+50Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 14+50Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 11Date: 10/05/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionTan silty sand with trace of oversize113AverageProject:Inspector:1a 110In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specifications2020225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 10/5/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-32 T-09082-32 13+00 14+50 N/A N/A Common Common -11 -15 0 degrees 111.5 110.1 90 degrees 110.0 110.7 average 110.8 110.4 0.0 0 degrees 11.9 12.9 90 degrees 12.8 12.8 average 12.4 12.9 0.0 12.44 12.38 0.00 0.00 12.44 12.38 0.00 0.50 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.41 0.00 4 3 #DIV/0! 95.96 96.71 #DIV/0! 113.0 113.0 98.0 97.7 #DIV/0! 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.4 Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: