HomeMy WebLinkAboutTri-Park Master Plan - 2006 (ORD 5797)LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVER PARK
NARCO SITE
TRl - PARK
MASTED
-PLAN
September 2006
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
t� +
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc.�A�{rL
LI9EKlY I -ARE
CEPAR RIL'I R Pa Rk
NARCO tiI I! _
TRI-PARK
MASTER -
PLAN
i1t'f»RI.,MN
[r]Mw,LrY scwicEs
Tri-Park Master Plan Update
Executive Summary
Background
The Tri-Park Master Plan was initiated to prepare for and address the impacts to park lands and
facilities by the Interstate 405 (I-405) improvements. The proposed highway project will have
profound impacts on both sides of the current alignment, but the most significant impact will
occur along the western flank. As a result, the existing BNSF railroad tracks will need to be
realigned and Houser Way will be eliminated. The City and Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) officials agreed to conduct a design charrette (workshop) which took
place in July, 2005. The charrette team was comprised of each agency's staff members, and two
consultants: a landscape architect/park designer and a hydro -geologist. These consultants were
selected by the Renton staff. A copy of the charrette report is included in the Appendix. The
charrette findings were presented to the Renton City Council and WSDOT officials and were
enthusiastically approved by all parties.
Master Plan Process
In the fall of 2005, the City of Renton selected JGM Landscape Architects, Inc. of Bellevue,
Washington to prepare the Tri-Park Master Plan. JGM had previously worked as the landscape
architect and park planner at the charrette. A process to involve the community in the master
planning process was created. A visioning workshop followed by a planning workshop and two
(2) community open houses invited and involved the public in the planning process. The Park
Board reviewed and commented on the master plan, as it developed, during three of their regular
meetings. The Mayor and the Renton City Council members also reviewed the plan as it
evolved. Presentation materials and a brief synopsis of each of these meetings can be found in
the Appendix.
The Master Plan
The Tri-Park Master Plan unites Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco Site, an
undeveloped tract of land, owned by the city, located on the south side of the Cedar River,
immediately upstream of I-405. This unification was made possible because of the I-405
modifications which created a "barrier free" environment linking Liberty and Cedar River Parks
by trails under the new 1-405 and railroad bridges. The Narco Site will be linked to these parks
by a new pedestrian bridge and a pedestrian/vehicle bridge. Linkages to upstream trails, parks
and the Maplewood Golf Course will be created through the Narco Site, via the Cedar River
Trail.
Facilities
The Tri-Park Master Plan presents a wide range and balance of recreation facilities. The plan is
to transition the active, close -quartered sports fields from Liberty Park to Cedar River Park and
the Narco Site. This will improve safety, better accommodate user needs, reduce maintenance
and improve sustainability. No existing facility will be removed until the suitable replacement
has been constructed. Below is a brief description of each of the park's master plan components:
Liberty Park: The ball fields will be relocated to another area and replaced with a
passive meadow for informal activities. The tennis courts and basketball courts will be
relocated within the existing park. The skate park will be relocated and doubled in size
along Bronson Way to enhance use and monitoring from the street. The Cedar River
Trail will be realigned to eliminate conflicts between park and trail users. A new teen
center will be located in the on -site building that formerly served as park offices. An
additional restroom building is proposed. The total number of parking spaces will be
decreased to 100, with increased parking available in other parts of the park. The Renton
Public Library is also planning a master plan update in the near future.
Cedar River Park: The master plan depicts an expanded Cedar River Park. This
expansion assumes the former Stoneway Concrete Site can be acquired by WSDOT as
mitigation for impacts to Renton's parklands (see Mitigation). As a part of this master
plan expansion, the existing ball field (with overlapping soccer field) will be relocated.
New improvements include: the Aquatic Center doubled in size; an additional
gymnasium within the Community Center; an expanded lobby for the Carco Theatre;
redeveloped outdoor meeting space along the river near the Community Center;
expanded parking; a new access road to SR 169; and three new synthetic turf ball fields
with lighting, nearby restrooms and other support facilities. A new park road and bridge
across the Cedar River to the Narco Site will be integrated into the improvements.
Pedestrian paths will connect all of the existing and new facilities and a new pedestrian
bridge will connect with the Narco Site.
Narco Site: This former brick manufacturing plant site presents a unique park and open
space opportunity. Currently, the Cedar River Trail transverses its flat open meadow.
Steep wooded hillsides define the southern margins of the site. These hillsides are
classified as sensitive areas because of steep gradients, abandoned mine sites, slide
hazards and wetlands. For these reasons, the master plan only proposes recreation
development for the flat, open meadow and some grading on the "spoils" mound of
rejected bricks, currently located between the trail and the river. The proposed
improvements include four multi -purpose, lighted, synthetic turf, athletic fields; parking;
passive meadows; a picnic shelter; picnic sites; restrooms; a play area; realignment of the
existing trail; and new pedestrian and vehicular access bridges.
The Narco Site was purchased with assistance form King County Open Space Funds.
One condition of that funding was that half of the passive, flat, open meadow space
would remain passive. The city has elected to use a substantial percentage of the land for
active purposes. Therefore, the city will enter into negotiations with King County to
purchase the right to develop and use the land for active uses.
Schedule
The Interstate 405 Improvements Project schedule is only partially funded at this time. The
funded portions schedules have been set and the work and associated mitigation is progressing.
Unfortunately, the 1-405 improvements mostly impacting the Tri-Park project are unfunded and
therefore, are only projections. The projected completion date for the I-405 improvements
directly impacting the Cedar River/Tri-Park is 2023... which is dependent on funding.
Mitigation
WSDOT and the City of Renton have worked together to determine ways to maximize the
transportation benefits and minimize park impacts. The 2005 charrette was a part of the process
to find mutually acceptable solutions. The Tri-Park Master Plan recognizes this process is still
"in -motion" but also reflects assumptions that have been agreed upon "in concept" by both
parties. It should be noted that the proposed acquisition of the Stoneway Site is such an
assumption. WSDOT will be responsible for negotiating with Stoneway's owner (s) to acquire
the property. Other mitigation considerations include the new pedestrian and vehicular bridges
over the Cedar River and development costs for relocation and/or replacement of recreation
facilities.
Utilities
The Tri-Park site is located above an aquifer that supplies the City of Renton's water. The
master plan maintains access to and has been prepared in such a manner that it protects this
valuable resource.
Costs
An Opinion of Probable Construction Costs has been prepared. Because the mitigation
discussions are on -going, costs attributed to each agency have not been determined. A copy of
the overall cost opinion is included in the Appendix.
LI9EKlY I -ARE
CEPAR RIL'I R Pa Rk
NARCU tiI I! _
TPUTARK
MASTER -
PLAN
i1t'f»RI.,MN
[r]Mw'LrY scwicEs
Tri-Park Master Plan Meeting Dates - 2006
Initial Meeting with Park Staff
February 2
Visioning Workshop with the Community
February 28
Meeting with Jennifer Hennig
March 2
Park Staff Meeting #1
March 6
Park Board Meeting #1
March 14
Park Staff Meeting #2
March 27
Mayor Briefing #1
March 29
Council Meeting #1
April 10
Community Open House #1
April 18
Parks Staff Meeting #3
May 31
Mayor Briefing #2
June 6
Park Board Meeting #2
June 13
Council Meeting #3
June 19
Community Open House #2
June 28
Mayor Briefing #3
July 19
Council Meeting #4
August 7
Community Open House #3
August 16
Park Board Meeting #3
September 12
Mayor Briefing #4
September 20
Adoption by City Council
September 25
rm-=
A
am
k. lV
r/
Cl 13
Ct!3
13
Do
13
13
U
11
'.
0.
E
�3
al M =1 13
123
... . .......
LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVI R PARK
NARCO Sl rl-,
TRI-PAR-K
MASILP,
PLAN
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
C.uncii Adoptud Sk-ptcmiwr V,, 2006
fWI fields/
CEDAR M,R A —
IV
Narco Site
I
Appendix
LI9EKlY I -ARE
CEPAR RIL'I R Pa Rk
NARCU tiI I! _
TRI-PARK
MASTER -
PLAN
i1t'f»RI.,MN
[r]Mw'LrY scwicEs
Table of Contents
2005 Charrette Report
Initial Meeting - February 2, 2006
Agenda
Meeting Minutes
Visioning Workshop — February 28, 2006
Agenda
Small Group Discussion Guidelines
Ideas for Public Workshop
Presentation
Workshop Photos
Workshop Comment Summary
Meeting Minutes
Minutes from meeting with Jennifer Hennig — March 2, 2006
Park Staff Meeting Minutes — March 6, 2006
Park Board #1 — March 14, 2006
Park Staff Meeting Site Alternatives Presentation — March 27, 2006
Council Briefing #1 — April 10, 2006
Open House # 1 — April 18, 2006
Photos
Open House Comment Summary
Park Staff Meeting — May 31, 2006
Park Board #2 — June 13, 2006
Council Briefing #2 — June 19, 2006
Open House #2 — June 28, 2006
Photos
Open House Comment Summary
Council Briefing #3 — August 7, 2006
Open House #3 — August 16, 2006
Photos
Open House Comment Summary
Park Board #3 — September 12, 2006
Memo to Council — September 20, 2006
Committee Report — September 25, 2006
Cedar River
Vicinity Charrette
Solutions for Parks, Wells &Local Access
Mission: To identify a balanced, mutually supported
design concept for the 1-405 improvements in Renton
that responds to the City of Renton's needs and the
requirements of a regional corridor.
MWashington State =� . City of Renton
Department of Transportation
4" V-11,
rpm
Y
f .4ZF fh
July 11 — 14, 2005
�l
Contents
The 1-405 Corridor Project ........................1
The Charrette...........................................3
The Challenge Defined .............................5
Performance Criteria................................9
Evaluation & Refinement ........................11
The Solutions..........................................16
Appendices
bound separately
• Meeting agendas
• Presentation notes
• Technical review of solutions
View of existing 1-405 corridor through fully
developed urban Renton; Renton City Hall
at/eft.
Participants
Charrette Team
Dave McNeal
Park Planner (JGM)
Russ Prior
Wells and Aquifer (PGG)
Leslie Betlach
Parks Director (Renton)
Lys Hornsby
Water & Utilities Director (Renton)
Mike Stenhouse
Maintenance Service Director
(Renton)
Keith Woolley
Transportation (Renton)
Andrew Laski
Transportation (1-405 Team)
Marcia Wagoner
Facilitator (PRR)
City of Renton Leadership
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Mayor
Terri Briere
City Council President
Marcie Palmer
Councilmember
Don Persson
Councilmember
Jay Covington
Chief Administrative Officer
Dennis Culp
Community Services Department
Administrator
Alex Pietsch
Economic Development
Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman
Department of Public Works
Administrator
City of Renton Staff
Sandra Meyer
Transportation Systems Director
Nick Afzali
Transportation Planning and
Programming Manager
Ted Hickey
Fire Department
Ray Sled
City of Renton Water Services
1-405 Leadership Team
Kim Henry
Chief Engineer
Stacy Trussler
1-5 (Tukwila) to 1-90 Project
Manager
Keith McGowan
Environmental Deliverables
Manager
Steve Quinn
GEC Project Manager
Allison Ray
Environmental Manager
1-405 Staff/Charrette Support
Larry Kyle
QA/QC Manager
Colleen Gants
Public Information
Karl Westby
Traffic Analysis Manager
Brian Wilkinson
Public Information
Ross Fenton
Tukwila to Renton Contract
Manager
Tony Cube
Public Information
John Donatelli
Renton to Bellevue Contract
Manager
Todd Merkens
Public Information
Jim Jordan
Renton to Bellevue NEPA Manager
Scott Guter
Public Information
Matt Klontz
Renton to Bellevue Designer
Amy Olcese
Public Information
Brian Elrod
CSS Team
Laura Smith
Tukwila to Renton Structures
Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
The 1=405 Corridor Project
The I-405 Master Plan, or vision, for the corridor will ultimately add up to two
additional lanes in each direction from I-5 in Tukwila to I-5 in Lynnwood. It
will include major transit system expansion supported by transit access and
operational capital improvements to 1-405. Among the transit improvements
will be the implementation of a Bus Rapid Transit system, major park and ride
expansions, arterial improvements and an aggressive transportation demand
management program.
The Implementation Plan will improve 1-405 continuously from 1-5 in Tukwila to
SR 522 in Bothell. The Implementation Plan's improvements will closely match
the Master Plan from SR 167 in Tukwila to 1-90, which is the narrowest portion
of the corridor with the highest congestion. The section from 1-90 to SR 522
will have one additional lane added each way. The portion of this section from
NE 70th to NE 116th will be constructed to near Master Plan level. Multi -modal
aspects include transit access ramps, park and ride expansion, Bus Rapid Transit
improvements to allow BRT line implementation, and transit expansion.
Roadway Improvements
Freeway: +2 lanes
Freeway: +1 lanes
Arterial Connection
Transit-HOV Improvements
♦ HOV Lane Access Point
OST Funded HOV
Lane Access Point
Q Transit
¢4 Park & Ride Lots
i. Freeway to Freeway
HOV Connection
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
KING COUN Y
G�
Renton to
Bellevue
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access
1-405 with Liberty park and BNSF railroad
trestle over Cedar River
Focus on Renton
Threading highway improvements through a fully developed city is always a
challenge and in Renton that challenge is even greater. The interchange between
I-405 and SR 169 is over a sole -source aquifer that provides the City of Renton's
drinking water. Along with wells on either side of the freeway, Liberty Park, the
city's oldest park, is located on one side of the right of way and Cedar River Park
with its new aquatic center on the other. The Cedar River, with its recreational
trail bridge connection, flows beneath the travel lanes and the BNSF railroad
line parallels them. The Renton Hill neighborhood, separated from the center
of town by I-405 and steep topography, has important general purpose and
emergency access needs that must be met. City -owned property that provides a
current resource for business startups plus sites that offer economic development
opportunities may also be affected by the changes.
Charrette study area
2 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 - 14, 2005
The Charrette
Why a Charrette?
WSDOT and the City of Renton have struggled to develop a solution that
meets the needs of the proposed I-405 improvements while ensuring adequate
access to Renton Hill, minimal affects to the aquifer and wells, and protecting
the integrity of the three parks in the project vicinity. The complexity of the
design problem and the length of time that had been devoted to trying to find
an answer led the 1-405 team and the City of Renton to consider a different
problem solving method. The multiple players from both WSDOT and the
City of Renton, each with different responsibilities and perspectives, had made
resolution difficult. Though the process to date had secured some agreements,
project advancement needed a clear direction quickly in order to meet the
timeframe to secure possible future funding. WSDOT and the City of Renton
identified a charrette, which would gather a team of design professionals to
focus solely on identifying a balanced solution, as an excellent opportunity for
Mission
To identify a balanced, mutually
supported design concept for the 1-405
improvements in Renton that responds
to the City of Renton's needs and the
success. By bringing fresh but informed perspective and being able to devote requirements of a regional corridor.
a week of time to understanding program needs, complex relationships and
possible solutions, the charrette approach offered the opportunity to find what
had been elusive — a mutually supported answer. Guiding Principles
The Cedar River Vicinity Charrette
The Cedar River Vicinity Charrette began with presentations from elected
officials, City of Renton leadership and WSDOT staff and consultants to
provide a full picture of the needs and challenges. A view trip enabled the
charrette team to experience the area first hand while raising questions and
engaging in discussions about their observations. The second day began with
individual observations of the prior day, followed by smaller groups working to
identify the functional requirements for various elements such as the wells and
recreational facilities. With these requirements in place, the team began work
on a parks master plan that responded to the functional requirements for various
kinds of access to the wells, the space for highway widening and interchange
ramps and the relocated railroad. Work continued the following morning with
added focus on the access requirements to Renton Hill. By early afternoon,
the team had completed concepts for the parks master plan and Renton Hill
access that they felt responded to the challenges identified in the opening
presentations on the first day. A presentation to the I-405 and City of Renton
leadership confirmed that the charrette team had indeed identified a promising,
balanced direction. With guidance from the Leadership Team's comments and
• Continue to support 1-405 Renton to
Bellevue improvements as a critical
need within the Corridor.
• Commit to working to solve one
another's issues.
• Jointly work to minimize impacts and
balance benefits for the betterment of
the community.
• Identify a project plan for regional
funding decisions.
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 3
The Charrette
suggestions, supported by technical work from the I-405 team to test concepts
for the ramp and trail clearances beneath the railroad bridge, the charrette team
focused their work on finalizing a proposal and presentation materials. The final
presentations, hosted by the City of Renton, were met with strong support.
Objectives
The I-405 project team engaged local planners and agency directors in a design
charrette from July 11th to July 14th, 2005 to arrive at a solution regarding
proposed I-405 improvements in Renton. The eight charrette team members
were challenged to determine how to lessen or eliminate any effects to the City
of Renton's parks, water and transportation systems due to the future expansion
of I-405. The four day design session provided the opportunity for participants
to identify an agreeable solution that met the needs of the City of Renton, the
planned improvements to I-405, and the local and regional communities while
considering a possible regional funding opportunity in the Renton area.
Charrette Stages
Day 1: The Challenge Defined
Leadership and the project team set the stage and defined the scope of the
challenge. Participants saw the issues on the ground at an afternoon site tour and
began to review the complex details and constraints.
Day 2: Performance Criteria
The charrette team worked to identify functional requirements for the wells and
parks and initiated development of a viable solution set.
Day 3: Evaluation & Refinement
Team members participated in a morning working session and prepared for the
afternoon mid -point presentation of early options with feedback provided by
City of Renton and WSDOT representatives.
Day 4: The Solutions
The team refined their proposed plans for meeting the charrette's objectives.
They highlighted and supported the reasoning for the best solution for each
issue in the final presentation to the Leadership Team.
4 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
The Challenge Defined
Charrette facilitator, Marcia Wagoner, welcomed participants to the charrette
kick-off on July 11, 2005. Participants included the charrette team, the mayor
and executive staff from the City of Renton and I-405 project staff and directors.
In their opening remarks, all participants expressed the importance of finding a
solution that was compatible with both the I-405 project and local needs.
Introduction and Overview
Stacy Trussler, I-405 Project Manager, noted the substantial and difficult work
completed to date and reviewed the challenge before the charrette team. Many
critical resources to the community of Renton lie within the same footprint
affected by planned improvements to the I-405 corridor. The interchange
between SR 169 and I-405 is at the same location as a sole -source aquifer that
provides the majority of the City of Renton's drinking water. The oldest city
park is on the same site, as well as a skate park, various wells, and a new aquatic
park, which provides significant revenue for the city. The Cedar River, a critical
natural resource, flows through this area. Next to the river is Renton Hill, where
important concerns regarding access for general purpose and emergency needs
must be met in this residential area. In addition, numerous utilities lie in the
immediate project vicinity and future development plans may call for converting
the nearby Narco property into a park. Ms. Trussler concluded that the charrette
brought many great minds to the table to address these concerns and discover
the best path forward.
Kim Henry, Chief Engineer for the I-405 project, added his thoughts regarding
the complex issues the charrette participants faced. In the past, every time a new
solution was evaluated, there was always a trade-off. "Despite these challenges,
I am optimistic this team has all the resources to arrive at the right solution,"
Mr. Henry concluded.
The Challenge
Members of the Leadership Team from the City of Renton were invited to
address the group and offer direction. Renton Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
noted that this project is probably the most important project in the careers of
those sitting around the table. She emphasized the work must be accomplished
within the budget, function efficiently and fit well within the community. It is a
complicated matter that warrants a creative approach.
Charrette team members experience the
study area while receiving background
information from the project team on the
Renton Avenue access to Renton Hill
"I am confident everyone
will be proud of the results
achieved by the charrette
team."
— Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Renton Mayor
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access)
The Challenge Defined
1-405 surrounded by Liberty Park, city
wells and the BNSF railroad
"There may not be an easy
answer that solves all of
the concerns."
— Kim Henry
Chief Engineer, 1-405 Project
The Cedar River pedestrian crossing
below 1-405
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer, said effects to places like Renton
Hill must be minimized while improving traffic conditions for the city and the
region. He noted it is critical to city operations to work together to address
wells, parks and access. WSDOT and the City of Renton should be particularly
sensitive to impacted neighborhoods.
Funding Considerations
The I-405 Implementation Plan is $4.7 billion, although that cost may change
as the I-405 Team works with the regional funding group to define a fundable
package. As development of the regional package moves forward, there is concern
about pressure to trim down the scope and costs. To be successful in securing
sufficient funding from the regional package, there must be a clear vision and a
supported plan. If WSDOT and the City of Renton reach agreement on a plan and
act together in support, the opportunity for success in securing regional funding
for a complete project is enhanced.
Discipline Overviews
The City of Renton executive staff and I-405 project staff provided background
regarding the specific elements under consideration.
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator for the City of Renton,
expressed the importance of balancing the needs of the neighborhood with the
need to get traffic through town. Key parcels that are important to the City for
economic development are potentially affected by the I-405 improvements.
There are already development plans for the Stoneway site by its owners,
and the old city hall, the 200 Mill Building, is a city resource that gets young
companies going in the community. It will be important to save this facility as
much as possible, including sufficient parking which is already stretched at this
site. Common sense needs to prevail to arrive at a balanced solution that meets
the time and budget requirements of the project. Mr. Pietsch noted that, "My
goal is to complete the 1-405 improvements because of the benefits they will
provide to the community."
Partnering
Gregg Zimmerman, Department of Public Works Administrator for the City of
Renton, highlighted the agreements agencies had already reached regarding the
mainline, the I-405 and SR 167 interchange, drainage for John's Creek and the
6 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 - 14, 2005
wetland mitigation bank. He noted that even with these accomplishments, there
were still tough challenges for the charrette team to address:
• A second primary access point to Renton Hill to meet community needs.
• Preserving the wells, achieving access, meeting the geological concerns, and
possibly relocating the corrosion control facility.
• The Burlington Northern Railroad.
• Effects to parks.
• The flyover ramp from I-405 to SR 169 and the height of the ramp.
• The location of utilities in Cedar River Park and moving a utilities corridor.
• A plan to obtain regional funding.
Mr. Zimmerman suggested that the only way to evaluate and compromise on
these issues was to utilize a partnering approach.
Parks
The City of Renton Community Services Department Administrator, Dennis
Culp, said that the team should go beyond mitigating effects to parks and
investigate opportunities to create a premier park complex. He reported the
city recently received permission from the county for lighted soccer fields at
the Narco property. Developers relay to city staff that the proximity of parks to
neighborhoods is an important selling point and they should regard the parks as
an asset. He added that access to Cedar River Park needs to remain convenient
for residents and park -goers. At this time the proposed I-405 to SR 169 flyover
is eye -level with the slides at the new aquatic center and could severely affect
the quality of the aquatic park experience.
Environmental Planning Process
Allison Ray, I-405 Environmental Manager, said that the charette will address
important issues that need to be resolved before the environmental process
begins for the Renton Implementation Environmental Assessment (EA). The
EA is currently scheduled to start in January 2006 with a scoping meeting for
agencies and tribes as well as public citizens. The I-405 team will also meet
with the public to discuss the key findings of the discipline reports, as well as
hold a formal public hearing so that agencies, tribes and citizens can provide
comments on the EA. From an environmental perspective, the key aspect
of the charrette is to document all the decisions that are made to support the
project's permitting process. When the I-405 team applies for environmental
permits, the team will need to document all design decisions, both those that
are the preferred designs as well as those that were dismissed from further
consideration. The information gathered from the work during the charrette will
be instrumental in successfully completing the permitting process.
The Challenge Defined
"We need to work as a
team to make sure these
improvements will benefit
the public as much as the
needs of the agencies."
—Terri Briere
Renton Council President
The Cedar River at Cedar River Park
Cedar River as it passes under the BNSF
railroad and 1-405
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 7
The Challenge Defined
1-405 and SR 169 off ramp adjacent to
Cedar River Park and city wells
i
K.
� F
i
Congestion in the area circled lead the
proposal to cul-de-sac Houser Way
Existing pedestrian bridge over the Cedar
River with 1-405 overhead
Project Overview and Issues
Ross Fenton, Tukwila to Renton Contract Manager, addressed the proposed
improvements to I-405 in the study area. Plans include completely rebuilding
the SR 167 interchange and adding lanes to I-405. These improvements will
double the width of I-405 requiring the two existing accesses at Renton Hill to be
removed. This widening limits the options for rebuilding current access points due
to right-of-way and physical constraints which result in excessively steep grades.
Proposed changes to accommodate the highway widening may also affect parks
and other elements. Additional site considerations include emergency access
to Renton Hill. Currently, there are two existing locked south side hill access
points which are opened when weather and emergency situations require them,
but these are otherwise closed to prevent neighborhood cut -through traffic. Also,
south -side access doesn't provide for the required emergency response times.
The SR 169 and Sunset Avenue intersection is frequently congested due to many
left turns to SR 169, a ramp onto I-405, a primary arterial (Houser Way) and
a railroad crossing. It was recommended to turn Houser Way into a cul-de-sac
to eliminate one of three closely spaced intersections. This will improve traffic
operations between Sunset Avenue, SR 169, and Bronson Avenue, which many
residents take to travel through town.
John Donatelli, Renton to Bellevue Contract Manager, discussed improvements to
I-405 between SR 169 and the Cedar River. He described the domino effect that the
proposed I-405 improvements have on the surrounding area. Wells located on the
east and west sides of the freeway are constraints on the I-405 alignment. The future
I-405 mainline alignment drives the relocation of the BNSF railroad approximately
50 feet west, which in turn, requires the relocation of the Houser Way South bridge
over the Cedar River. As the railroad is relocated, Houser Way might have to be
lowered to maintain the current access point into Cedar River Park. However,
lowering Houser Way impacts access to wells 1, 2, and 3 and service vehicles need
access to these wells on a regular basis. On the east side of I-405, in the Cedar River
Park, a ramp alignment that avoids the well heads and water treatment facilities
has been identified. However, this alignment limits access to the current corrosion
control treatment facility.
Prior to adjourning the kick-off meeting, the charrette team was directed by the
City of Renton leadership to look at all the options and present the benefits and
drawbacks of each alternative for their consideration. All those in attendance
were encouraged to attend the check -in presentation on Wednesday and the final
report -out on Thursday.
Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
Performance Criteria
Pump & Wells Considerations
The charrette team identified the following criteria for consideration prior to
developing solutions for wells. In Cedar River Park, clearances are sufficient for
Wells 8 and 9, treatment facilities and the corrosion control facility to function
successfully in their current locations when the new off ramp is constructed.
However, modification will be required for Well 9. There is logic in keeping
them adjacent to I-405 and the off -ramp rather than using additional park
property to accommodate a new location. In addition, there is concern about
getting the same yield if new wells are drilled.
Wells 1, 2 and 3 drive many of the site decisions for Liberty Park and they should
only be relocated as a last resort. Access needs for the trucks, supplies and special
equipment required to maintain function of the wells appears achievable though it
may require reconfiguring the well house structure to compensate for the narrower
adjacent roadway resulting from the I-405 expansion.
w �
Ross Fenton, Russ Prior and Mike
Stenhouse discuss wells concerns
Well & Corrosion Control Facility Access Needs
Wells 1, 2 & 3,8 & 9 Corrosion Control Facility
• Daily maintenance — vans, 1'/2 ton flatbed (20') • Sodium hydroxide — 70' tanker, 2 to 3 times per month
• Chlorine (semi-monthly) & fluoride (monthly) — 2 ton Boom truck/crane — tank replacement
flatbed (40')
• Drill rig — Well maintenance/redevelopment (40')
• Boom truck/crane — pull pump for replacement
Wells & Utilities Needs
Geohydrology Study
• Background/baseline on well yield, water quality
• Evaluate reduced recharge
• Evaluate need for additional monitoring wells
Emergency Response/Spill Control Plan
Environmental Coordinator during
Construction
Design Considerations
Utility Relocation Plan Containment — spills and storm water, roadway and ponds
• Relocate utilities out of 1-405 footprint (curbs, walls, liners)
• Provide casing for those that can't be relocated (Carco Road Spread footings — avoid aquifer penetration, location, no
24-inch?) footings in river
• Alternate location for 24-inch main on Houser Bridge
(Railroad Bridge?)
Groundwater Monitoring Plan
• Borings — no mud rotary, properly seal with >_ 30% solids
bentonite
• Protect 100-foot sanitary control radius
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 9
Performance Criteria
Charrette team at work
Functional Considerations
• The trail bisecting Liberty Park is not a
good connection.
• Access is required on the south side to
Narco Park.
• The aquatic center plans to double in
size in the future.
• A height restriction must be met above
the river and below Renton Avenue.
• Pedestrian bridge creates conflict with
community center and prevents access
between the parks.
• Historical shelter sited on current
meadow site.
• Green belt along the river desired.
• Trail at well house needs to
accommodate vehicles.
• Lengthen railroad to open up trail
connection.
• Marketing high end mixed use to
both Stoneway and South Lake
Washington.
• Some contamination concerns at
Stoneway site.
Parks Considerations
Participants determined functional and design considerations for the parks in
the project vicinity. The three park properties should be integrated into a whole.
Current central parking needs to remain in the scheme with added parking at
the Narco property connected by a trail to Cedar River Park. Bronson Avenue at
Garden Avenue is the best choice for Liberty Park access if Houser Way is closed.
Constructing a new access off of Bronson Avenue at Garden Avenue requires
relocating the impacted ball fields, possibly to the Stoneway property if acquired.
.
it Ts #fi*s
ull fS." L
tiA.-NL p+ 'dr
•
J
AW Ilk
ti
Sketch focusing on pedestrian routes through Liberty
and Cedar River parks and along the Cedar River
10 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 - 14, 2005
Evaluation & Refinement
Key Elements of the Parks Proposal
At the mid -point presentation, the charrette team presented their initial proposal for
the parks for the Leadership Team's consideration and feedback. More information
regarding evaluated elements is included in the appendices.
Parks Proposal Highlights
Evaluate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the future park on the Narco property
collectively.
Consider relocating the Liberty Park ball fields and creating a large playfield in the
center of the park.
Move the skate park next to the new teen center to address the loss of "drive -by"
supervision previously provided by the Houser Bridge.
Relocate the stadium to allow space for the dedicated park entrance on Garden
Avenue and eliminate the need for Houser Way access.
Remove Houser Way to allow for additional parking for the former city hall and space
for an access road or trail.
• Relocate the new pedestrian bridge to create a continuous route for the Cedar River
Trail.
Imp
V,1.
�4 f Ic,.
~a I
Sketch of possible parks layout and pedestrian routes
*� al Imo• m
k Frfs2+
""ems'
'10AW-A
Mar
+' A t� - !s�/�; �{i kJaIr
i ••ram
vLVW
490.0;
�
N0
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 11
Evaluation & Refinement
PP -Alm-
'), tlkh�
Parks proposal presentation of concepts
and evaluation by Dave McNeal
Provide access to the community center in Cedar River Park through the existing
parking lot.
Convert the open space between the aquatic park and exit ramp into an activity
meadow.
• Realign the merge location of SR 169 to move the flyover ramp further away from the
aquatic park.
• Build a new vehicle bridge to provide both bicycle and pedestrian access to the
Narco property from Cedar River Park.
Evaluation of the Park Proposal
Following is the charrette team's comparison of their proposed park solution to
existing conditions.
Cedar River Park with Stoneway Parcel
Plus
• Maintains existing wells
• Provides access for chemical delivery
• Adjusts Maple Valley Highway flyover
ramp, alignment for improved pool and
park access, function, aesthetics
• Reduced off ramp touchdown required
• Improved trail connectivity
• Enhanced aquifer protection/recharge
• Increased revenue generation by
combining programmed ball fields
• Improves greenway along river
• Protects sensitive slopes
• Enhanced Narco property access
• Maintains two access points at same
location
• Stoneway acquisition allows for
potential relocation of ball fields
• Visual connection between Liberty
Park and Cedar River Park
• Community center theater and aquatic
facility remain
• Relocated signalized access from
Maple Valley Highway
• Relocated pedestrian bridge to
enhance regional trail
Neutral
• Modified parking configuration
2 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
Evaluation & Refinement
Liberty Park
Plus
• Increased park area with removal of
Houser Way
• Improved park access from Bronson
Avenue at Garden Avenue
• Improved trail access and connectivity
• Improved picnic and play area
relationship
• Potential to increase tennis capacity
• Large active meadow
• Maintains existing wells and access
• Teen center
• Enhanced greenway along river
Narco Property
Plus
• Library bridge from city -owned
property to Liberty Park maintained
• Enhancement along river at former
bridge location(s)
• New access between Cedar and
Narco properties
Neutral
• One pedestrian bridge
• Relocated skate park
• Relocated tennis, basketball, parking
• Maintains connection to library
Without Stoneway Parcel (Full 13+ Acres)
Negative
• Lost opportunity for three programmed
ball fields
• Reduced aquifer protection/recharge
• Shared entrance
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 13
Evaluation & Refinement
eel
Cif — Scr ►dz�.�: Cp'H- G {
G+ri"SAC, — Fi 1mff
ae e +— cci"4
�i�c�ir-ey-rx�o.drEd��
CiP- mac. "+ "-ap'bn Q x'x�n4o
Emvft wxI-'JeewAdw-F op+w C
Renton Hill access considerations
Evaluation of Parks Proposal on Wells
The concerns and potential risks of moving the wells outweigh any opportunities.
Service access to the wells in Cedar River Park could be provided under the exit
ramp alignment from I-405 northbound to SR 169.
Positive
• Buildings for Well 8 remain
Neutral
• Access for chemical delivery truck
• Access for daily maintenance
• Difficult access to some underground
utilities (water main in Carco Road)
Negative
• Major modification of buildings for Well
9 and wells 1, 2, 3
• Further encroachment into sanitary
control area
Key Elements of the Access Proposal
Several schemes developed by the I-405 team were explored by the charrette
team for access to Renton Hill. Of those schemes, Option C and Option Q2
seemed most promising to the charrette team.
Access Options
• Option C combines two existing routes by providing a crossing of 1-405 at Renton
Avenue with a connection to Main Avenue for primary access.
• Option C requires additional access on the north side of Renton Hill or a new fire
station must be built on the south side.
• Option Q2 provides desired connections and fire and emergency access with a
stacked structure.
• Option Q2 minimizes effects on the Narco property.
14 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
L�
.�: 'A FF
I �
t AT ceonx AVE. j
Option Q1 with Mill Avenue structure shorter than Q-View option
`M -Vrlf
Plan view of Renton Hill access Option C with Option Q-View stacked structure
Direction from Leadership Team
• Investigate moving railroad under I-405 through Liberty Park
• Continue with plans to remove Houser Bridge
• Develop "no acquisition" option (if Stoneway is not available)
• Relocate baseball stadium
• Keep moving forward and continue the outstanding efforts
Evaluation & Refinement
t
i
Development of proposal by charrette team
Charrette mid -point presentation to City of
Renton and WSDOT leadership
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 15
The Solutions
\N'
I/P
40 9P
40'
+06T.
X
1, atA 6
Sketch combining parks, wells and Renton Hill access design as developed by the charrette team
16 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 - 14, 2005
-ANN
416"V
Ilk
AkAw "I
0"
r
I
Amu
1-405
MAPLE VALLEY HIGHwAy TO COAL CREEK PARKWAY EXA3
RENTON HILL ACCESS AZ SHEEF
CEDAR RIVER PARK ACCESS OPTIONS
EXHIBIT I
smFF rs
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 17
The Solutions
Important community resources are located within the vicinity of the planned
Parks Solutions at a Glance
I-405 freeway expansion near the Cedar River in Renton. WSDOT and the City
• Integrate Liberty, Cedar River and
of Renton needed to find a solution in order to move forward with a successful
Narco parks.
plan for the corridor while addressing any effects to parks, wells and local
• Provide primary park entrance at
Garden Avenue and Bronson Avenue.
access, especially Renton Hill access due to 1-405 project developments. The
• Remove existing Houser Bridge.
charrette team was brought together to critically examine these impacts and
• Create a new pedestrian bridge to link
develop a scheme that balanced community benefits and project needs. The
trail and parks.
following are the results developed by the charrette team.
• Remove ball fields and stadium from
Liberty Park and relocate at Stoneway
property.
Parks & Wells Solutions
• Expand Parks Department building to
allow for a new teen center.
• Relocate skate park next to teen
Create strong connections between Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, the
center.
undeveloped Narco site and the Cedar River Trail to produce the feel of one
• Keep theater, community center,
aquatic center and existing parking at
large park complex. The Cedar River Trail and the parks have existed there for
Cedar River Park.
some time as seemingly separate facilities, and the trail appears to disconnect
• Convert soccer fields into a general
under the railroad where it currently crosses the Cedar River. Redeveloping the
purpose meadow to allow for future
expansion of the aquatic park.
parks and the trail will allow the city to integrate them more effectively. The
• Move the flyover ramp to the median
Narco property is a hidden treasure that will become a great resource to the City
to provide distance from water slides
of Renton. The design scheme assumed development of the Narco site with
at the aquatic park.
sports fields and acquisition of the Stoneway property.
• Open up existing berm under the
railroad to visually connect Liberty and
Cedar River parks.
Close off Houser Way and replace it with a signal and pedestrian crossing at
Garden Avenue and Bronson Avenue to present a clear access point to Liberty
Park. Offering access at this point would require removal of the old oak trees
in that location, but given the long-term benefits of improved park access, it
is more important to provide a primary park entrance. Relocating the park
entrance impacts the existing stadium ball park, but creates an opportunity to
develop Liberty Park with recreational features more in alignment with adjacent
neighborhoods. Since Houser Way is out of the picture, the Houser Bridge is
no longer required and is removed in this plan. In addition, the railroad bridge
is relocated to the abandoned Houser Way. With the reconstruction of the
railroad bridge, there is an opportunity to remove the visual barrier created by
the existing railroad bridge, increase the length of the bridge and eliminate the
berm. By removing the railroad berm and replacing it with a bridge structure,
the more open trail would provide a stronger visual connection between the
parks. A new pedestrian bridge connecting the trail and parks is proposed to
replace the existing bridge. Relocating the bridge also provides an opportunity
to keep the Cedar River Trail as continuous as possible. For trail users to be
directed around the community center event lawn, which functionally requires
separation, the trail is realigned to direct pedestrians around the event center
and into Cedar River Park or the Cedar River Trail on the opposite bank. In
Liberty Park, the trail needs to be realigned to separate the picnic and play area
8 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
The Solutions
from the trail traffic. The main pedestrian through traffic will cross the bridge
to the Narco site and proceed onto the Cedar River trail. Cedar River Park users Wells Solutions at a Glance
can continue to the park facilities. As a way of providing a second park access
• All existing well needs are maintained.
point, construct a new vehicular bridge with sidewalks to Narco to link access to
• Add gated service route along BNSF
Renton Hill and Narco property.
right of way to provide access to wells
1,2and 3.
• Provide service route under proposed
The skate park, tennis courts, wells in Liberty Park and Houser Way will all be
exit ramp from northbound 1-405 to
affected by I-405 project activities. Since the facilities at the park are not high
SR 169.
quality and don't allow for tournament play options, it makes sense to turn
• Utilize park paths as emergency
access routes.
Liberty Park into a more passive park. The former ball fields could be converted
. Route trucks with chemicals to enter
into a sports meadow and the tennis courts relocated to the former stadium
facilities from SR 169 (limited access
location. The decision to take active field sports out of this park was not arrived
driveway) and exit empty through
Cedar River Park.
at lightly, but it appears to produce the most beneficial use of park resources.
. Construct major modifications to the
In the future, the facilities lost at Liberty Park could be replaced by converting
building for wells 1, 2 and 3 and well 9.
part of the Stoneway site into three ball fields. If the Stoneway property is not
purchased, then it will mean losing the ball field at this site.
With the closure of Houser Way, the skate park location becomes somewhat
isolated from view. Therefore, the skate park facility is moved closer to an area
where there is supervision to discourage potential illegal activities. The new
location is adjacent to Bronson Avenue next to the teen center in Liberty Park. In
addition, if Houser Street were removed, the existing area west of the river where
Houser Street is located could be incorporated into additional parking for the old
city hall building. The opportunity to expand the parking area could be beneficial
for the community.
In Cedar River Park, the scheme accounts for the existing theater, community
center and aquatic park. To provide for a possible expansion of the aquatic park,
the baseball field and soccer meadow between the aquatic park and exit ramp
is converted into a general purpose meadow. The parking lot at the site remains
in its current formation and maintains access to the community center. The
buffer is 100 feet wide along the river. Removal of Houser Way requires new
secondary access to Cedar River Park, therefore new access from the Narco site
across Cedar River is constructed to replace lost access.
A key advantage of acquiring the Stoneway property is added flexibility in the
touchdown location for the I-405 to SR 169 flyover ramp. It is potentially unsafe
if the end of the flyover ramp occurs at the park and SR 169 intersection, so
the ramp should remain elevated over the intersection. Next to the flyover is a
water slide, pool, backup space, and minimal planting opportunities. The ramp
is about the height of the slide. Different ideas were evaluated. One resulted in
implications from moving the entire structure into the hillside. Second, moving
the flyover into the median to provide greater separation between the ramp and
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 19
The Solutions
park was recommended, especially if eliminating the sidewalk (and routing
pedestrian traffic through the park) on SR 169 is a feasible option. It moves
the taller element of the flyover further back from the slide creating a buffer to
reduce visual and noise distractions.
It is important to avoid any impacts to wells and to evaluate any implications
that would affect service and maintenance access to the wells within the
parks. In Cedar River Park, service vehicles could approach the well house(s)
if a gated service path is maintained along the east side of the 1-405 right of
way. Adjustments to the well house for well 9 is needed to provide access for
pulling pumps. Service vehicles exiting the wells facility would go under the
proposed exit ramp alignment from 1-405 northbound to SR 169. Trucks could
Detail sketch of modified facility for wells 1, 2
and 3
0
r
Sketch of parks layout
20 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
off-load chemicals and then exit through the park via the parking lot and access
road, which also provides service and emergency vehicles access to the back
of the community center. If needed, paths throughout the park could serve as
emergency access routes including access to the fluoridation facility. An access
path next to the realignment of the railroad could provide access for large
maintenance trucks to wells 1, 2 and 3 in Liberty Park. Major modifications of
the well house for 1, 2 and 3 will be required. It will be important to maintain
and protect the two water lines that are currently on Houser Bridge and the area
under Narco Road.
r � � r• �
f
r
The Solutions
Sketch of Cedar River aquatic park and southbound 1-405 to
southbound SR 169 ramp options
Alternative park access if Stone Way property is not acquired
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 21
The Solutions
Access Solutions at a Glance
• Preferred solution is Option Q2 in
combination with Option C.
• Option Q2 utilizes space under the
existing Mill Avenueand lower Mill
Avenue at the 4th Street and Mill
Avenue interchange and ends at the
Narco property.
• Residents on 3rd Street have access
to their homes from the "upper Mill
Avenue."
• "Lower" 3rd Street provides access
to the park and to the existing Mill
Avenue and Houser Way intersection
with the connection under 1-405.
Renton Hill Access Solutions
In order to provide two access points to Renton Hill, Option Q-View (Cedar to
Narco property) and Option C (Renton Avenue to Main Avenue) are proposed
solutions. Option Q-View utilizes the existing Mill Avenue right of way and
provides access from a lowered Mill Avenue on Renton Hill down along the
southeast side of I-405 into Narco property, under 1-405 to the existing Narco
property access road, then to the existing intersection with Houser Way and Mill
Avenue. An "upper" 3rd Street is constructed over the "lower" Mill Avenue to
provide access to Renton Hill homes located off of Mill Avenue and to maintain
local Renton Hill circulation between Renton Avenue and Cedar Avenue on the
north side of the hill. Between "upper" and "lower" Mill Avenues, a 14-foot
vertical clearance is required which will allow emergency response vehicles. At
the 4th Street and Mill Avenue intersection, Option Q-View utilizes space under
the existing Mill Avenue. The new homes that front Mill Avenue would continue
to have access from "upper" Mill Avenue with "lower" Mill Avenue beneath
it providing access to the park and the connection under 1-405. The stacked
structure is open on the side facing 1-405.
Option Q has minor effects on park property and provides long -desired vehicle
access between Renton Hill and city riverside parks. During construction, four
homes on Renton Hill fronting Mill Avenue will have restricted access. Option
Q requires utility relocation. Estimated construction costs are comparable with
other options that were developed. Pedestrians will be provided with a trail on
"upper" Mill Avenue to Narco property and Cedar River Trail since there are no
pedestrian facilities on "lower" Mill Avenue. Overall, this has minor affects to
residential areas and businesses, does not accomodate cut -through traffic, and
allows emergency response times to be met.
Perspective of Renton Hill access Option C with Option Q-View
structure sketched in black
Computer -generated model of access solution as developed by
the charrette team
22 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
The Solutions
1 N13 •low
se Voss
i
Existing typical section at proposed
Renton Hill access
MI
4 it
V A
Photo -simulation showing access solution as developed by the charrette team
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access 23
The Solutions
L.,
Final presentation
"The charrette team has
done a wonderful job
and displayed a lot of
ingenuity."
— Don Persson
Renton City Councilmember
"After the number of years
we have battled these
issues, the final concept
looks amazing and there
are so many positives."
— Marc! Palmer
Renton City Councilmember
Leadership Team Response
The Leadership Team was impressed with the results of the group's efforts
and believed the charrette team solved many difficult issues, while improving
existing conditions for residents and parks. In particular, those attending the
presentation were pleased that the design scheme included siting the SR 169
flyover ramp at the center median, providing two access points to Renton Hill,
and preserving access and making improvements to wells 1, 2 and 3.
As a next step, the charrette team will brief the Renton council, mayor and
residents with the results of the charrette.
24 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette: July 11 — 14, 2005
Appendices
bound separately
• Meeting agendas
• Presentation notes
• Technical review of solutions
JGM
LANDSCA11F_. ARCHITECTS
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Agenda for Initial Meeting with Key City Staff
February 2, 2006 2 p.m.
2:00 1. Introductions
2:10 2. Project Objective: Update of Cedar River Greenway Master Plan with a special focus
on the Tri-Park area.
2:15 3. Constraints and Opportunities/Site Analysis
• I-405 Project Impacts (Charrette)
• Well Protection and Related Access
• Existing Recreation Facilities and Needs (i.e. future expansions)
• Narco Site Access
• Regulatory Environment
• Circulation/Traffic
• Possible Property Acquisitions
2:45 4. Discussion Areas:
• Transportation Issues Related to Park Road
o Park Access vs. Collector
o Speed Limit
o Projected Traffic Volumes
o Road Standards
• Water Systems:
o Facilities
o Maintenance
o Aquifer Protection
• Other Utilities
• Cost and Funding (I-405 Mitigation)
• Regulatory Issues
• Possible Future Property Acquisitions (Stoneway, Riviera sites, other?)
• Emergency Services (Police, Fire, Ambulance)
• Easements/Ownership:
o WSDOT — Under I-405/Narco Trail parcel
o Seattle — Water line near mid-point/left bank
o PSE — Upland power lines and Riverview Park
o BPA — Upland power lines
o BNSF
• Future Annexations ?
3:20 5. Next Steps:
• Community Involvement Process
• Departmental Contacts (For additional information and review comments)
3:30 Adjourn
JGM
LANDSCAPE ARCHII'E rs
MEETING MINUTES
February 2, 2006
From meeting with City of Renton Department Staff
Attendees:
Alex Pietsch, EDNSP
Mark Santor-Joh, EDNSP
Keith Woolley, PBPW
Transportation
Peter Renner, Community Services
Lys Hornsby, PBPW Utility Systems
Jerry Berecich, Recreation
Leslie Betlach, Park
Bill Rasmussen, Parks
David McNeal, JGM
Craig Lewis, JGM
The following materials were distributed:
• Agendas with consultant contact information on back
• Drawing of the I-405/Cedar River Charrette (A)
• Drawing of Park Access (B)
• Aerial photo of existing condition to Renton Hill (C)
• Aerial photo of Proposed Solution to Renton Hill (D)
• Section — Looking downstream of the proposed Cedar River Bridge (E)
In addition to the distributed materials, the consultants presented the 1993 Cedar River Natural
Zone Master Plan, current city ownerships, current WSDOT I-405 proposals, a 1"-200' plan of
the Trip -Park to Riverview portion of the greenway and a larger scale (1"-10') drawing of the
proposed Cedar River Bridge with trail under -crossings.
The discussion that followed is recorded here:
Alex commented that the Cedar River corridor is an important civic gateway to the city and that
development along the river presents an important economic opportunity. He presumed the
Stoneway property would be acquired for park purposes. He suggested similar attention to
downstream acquisition of properties be considered between Bronson Way and the Senior
Center. Question: Could this be included within this study?
Alex mentioned the library board was about to embark on a planning study for their future needs
and asked what role the library has in this plan. JGM responded that the library was to be
considered part of the project context until the firm is advised otherwise.
Alex also commented that he had a conceptual idea for a salmon museum on the Cedar River
that could serve as an educational and cultural facility. He indicated some interest and support
had been expressed by other agencies.
Mark expressed desire to enhance access to the river wherever possible and appropriate. The
Stoneway site, in particular, presents some unique opportunities.
Keith advised that WSDOT funding of the I-405 improvements south of SR169 are currently at
a lower priority ranking. In addition, WSDOT did not intend to install noise walls on I-405 on
the Cedar River Bridge or lands adjacent to the park. He stressed making all possible trail
connections.
Peter stated that there has been an application submitted for development of a new 900-unit
condominium project with some commercial space on the Riviera Apartment site.
Preservation/restoration and public access along the river will be required. He suggested that
where feasible, park concession outlets would be desirable to provide revenue. Peter also noted
the exterior of the old City Hall building (lease space) would be replaced next year.
Lys reminded the groups of the presence of major underground utilities. Maps indicating
locations were requested.
Jerry asked that the city plan to construct new replacement sports fields prior to demolition of
existing fields. The sports leagues are anxious to share their ideas regarding new facilities.
Leslie commented that the team needs to look at field requests in the context of how existing
fields are being utilized. She reminded the group that Renton does not have a teen center and
that the planners are considering the merits of a multi -generational / teen center. She further
commented that the plan needs to address the repair or replacement of the downstream trail.
Bill urged the group and planners to remember that Liberty Park is highly visible from I-405 and
as such, is a gateway to Renton. He suggested the master plan consider inclusion of future
acquisition of the residences along the river immediately upstream of the Cedar River Roadside
Park III.
Other elements specifically discussed were:
Park Road: The general consensus was that traffic calming and alignment should respond to the
park setting. Stop signs and crosswalks should be installed to protect pedestrians.
New Cedar River Bridge: The new bridge will make the Narco site more accessible and much
easier to find for first-time visitors while providing secondary emergency vehicle access. The
end approaches could be designed in a manner to provide trail separation. Care should be taken
to avoid "short -cutting" through the park. It was understood that the new bridge is considered as
mitigation and will be funded by WSDOT.
Annexation: The eastern end of the greenway adjacent to the existing city limits and
unincorporated King County may be affected by pending incorporation proposals.
Emergency Vehicle Access: Two routes of access will be provided to all park facilities within
the Tri-Park area. Trails can be included as a part of the access network providing paving
thickness, alignment and clearance standards are maintained.
Context / Connectivity: The Trip -Park Greenway must be planned in the overall context of the
river and the city. The plan should indicate connectivity with other trails, the downtown area,
Lake Washington and other civic amenities.
Stoneway Parcel: Keith volunteered to check the status of the on -going appraisals for the sale of
this parcel. Alex stated that the owner may submit for a development permit in order to raise his
sale price.
Communication with the Council: Alex urged Parks to keep the City Council appraised of the
planning process, including the presentation of the Community Workshop Agenda and plan
alternatives, prior to meeting with the public.
BPA Right -of -Wad Leslie suggested the BPA Row should also continue to be included in the
master plan.
Expansion of the Scope of Services: Alex suggested the limits of the master plan be extended
downstream to Logan Avenue / Senior Center. Leslie agreed to discuss these ideas with Dennis
Culp. Bill suggested the lease space/former City Hall site be included within the project scope.
-End of Minutes-
LIBERTY PAIL
CEDAR R1VF..R PARK
NARCO SITE
TRI-PARK
MASTER
PLAN
CITY (IF Rf'Hff1N
,MM 1TY SEIWIUE
CEDAR RIVER/TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Community Workshop Agenda
February 28, 2006
7:05 Introductions
7:10 Project Purpose
7:15 Background
• 1980's Era Master Plan
• WSDOT I-405 Charrette
7:30 Site Images
7:40 Site Analysis
7:50 Breakout Discussion Groups:
• Review DRAFT Vision Statement
• Review Planning Principles
• Identify "Hopes and Fears"
8:30 Small Group Reporting
8:50 Synthesis
Next Steps:
• Prepare Preliminary Plan Alternatives
9:00 Adjourn
Next Community Open House will be April 18t" (7-9pm) at Renton Community Center
LIBERTY P.RK
CEDAR Rf Vr..R PARK
NARCO SITE:
TRI-PAR-K
MASTEK
PLAN
'MMI-hITY Sk IUES
CEDAR RIVER/TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Small Group Discussion Guidelines
February 28, 2006
1. Select a Spokesperson to lead the discussion and to present the group's findings.
2. Select a Recorder to write down the group's ideas
3. Topics for discussion:
• Review the Planning Principles and DRAFT Vision Statement for the park(s).
What over-riding theme should reshape the parks' development?
• Create a "wish -list' of park program elements
• What hopes or fears do you have related to the redevelopment and
development of parks on these sites?
• What, if any, condition needs to be explored further?
• Any other items to discuss?
Please give all members of this group time and opportunity to contribute. If consensus or
agreement is not possible, please document and present each point -of -view.
40 minutes have been allotted for this discussion. Each spokesperson should share their group's
findings in a 2-3 minute summary.
LIBERTY P.RK
CEDAR Rf Vr..R PARK
NARCO SITE:
TRI-PAR-K
MASTEK
PLAN
'MMI-hITY Sk IUES
CEDAR RIVER/TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Ideas for Public Workshop
February 28, 2006
Project Purpose:
Re -master plan Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco Site to best meet the City
of Renton's park and recreational needs, protect the City's sole source aquifer and
incorporate future improvements to the I-405 and SR 169 corridors. This new plan will
reflect the dictates of the natural environment; recreational needs of citizens, staff and
elected officials; and park, utility and transportation requirements.
DRAFT Vision Statement:
Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco site to provide compatible park,
recreational and environmental opportunities that compliment a variety of uses which
meet community needs, promotes environmental stewardship and creates a focus of
community pride.
Planning Principles:
• Address Social/Recreation/Utility/Transportation Needs
• Conform with Regulatory Constraints
• Achieve Sustainability
• Promote Environmental Stewardship
• Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare
These principles will serve as evaluation criteria for master plan alternatives throughout
the planning process.
LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVER PARK,
NARCO SITE
TRI-PARK
MASTER
CITY OF RENTO'Nim
COMMUNITY SERVICES
L cs ��
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc. +7R
ff
Presented at the Visioning Workshop — February 28, 2006
Project Purpose:
Re -master plan Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco Site to best
meet the City of Renton's park and recreational needs, protect the City's
sole source aquifer and incorporate future improvements to the I-405 and
SR 169 corridors. This new plan will reflect the dictates of the natural
environment; recreational needs of citizens, staff and elected officials; and
park, utility and transportation requirements.
Background:
Original Cedar River Master Plan (1980s Era)
— —•-- pr
MASTER PLAN
.�"A..d �R TRAIL
City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department
.� ��`��.
�.:�.- .� r LS �.
ran e u r� n rrn ne r� u •• ; .'� � �� r��.
Background:
WSDOT I-405 Charrette — Summer 2005
�sruPr b�till�orsu�
% Rr r I�Atp 5�'
= Ltd
a
New
maw
�1 I „ SCbNi�WAY
ovcl -.
. fan as NAR iO
F' Lid 8Cf'6
3 ��
Access to Renton Hill:
Existing Condition
r,m*
-- f.,
Proposed Access
-4\
Cli � �� •r� .s:
^.t
tv
r,
i#
17
.44;y r
fir•-- _� ' � ` I .w3 •i S 'ry ��i� ��— I � .i ..
,� f
- I .fed .' j f — _
�lrr, .�
�. � �, �r •, �7. ►` ,t •,err � • .
7�-
-
tw . r rgvl -d ll ap7
rite/ RSAf '. f ��� t.• �•� :
P7
� j N
I
F-4
1".
loiftpiswol. #SAL 0. .
;'J�St.�-'�Y� , .mil-a-y„4 .Y• ��1�•� ¢.r + I�y��� � ����e��^ , � . ��. - � y
`�1..- fib w- :� .4f •'��� v _ , � 2, •;
a..r .�y•��. ..� .�."- ,'r��, ram. •�6i• .Y ��'
•T . ,'�►1��..,,. �4i; �4�i 'y' ,�"�i ` . ilk`` ''� �'
+ six
WRONG
WAY T■�� ,� +•- ;J), y
Will
Jo
„•y. � ter_ ���.�.rr• _ r ..�.. � _.
yam= �` :c .; �:'-fs�` • '• ' ° .. _ ..�.r - •
yr u?:��r.�r • r
a.: v
s.f �J Ifi'• � f -.
•.:tr , :.�;'r'v;.: . rn.` • Y gam s
� � _ _ i ::.�oa:%�7:! _ '^..'�`��_•q�' Irv-: V. ,.�
a
7r
V*
Jp
4
NA
AM
yr
Aw
.4 ... ..... .....
4\o
Xlmbm
; ;- - �� - � - �_�- _ !lam
. . . . . . . ...... .....
............. ...............
kk
I
rein
} `ifs;µ '
{�:. .y �.
r
i
i
s;,�
r'
.. ������
�.
- , =y►� ,
�r��
aui '^'i
•tom- • � ::,; , '° :ta, I`<<' :�' � _ `�_;
ANI ror
1%
rr■
rr��
���� .,_ ... a` �' w`.'- -''• A �"' .,..., -•fix y .
ol
•r' c.,. k�..• r•' :. :F' pi�g•y
IN
�.�..<��',� ��� III ► f
..
'7"
r64
74 k4
ONWC a m I u� 9.
s ► � '+�?::lei � ,-=.: �Jr
. �. � .�.• . �� . . �e _��� i'; � ;ll.�: Syr; � •� ;'�
i
FT, ;
;.
-y F ,
_ _
_ � 1 ' 4 � � -
_;. �.
i `-'. w
�Y, },.
-777
c.Vol
law
. . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . .
I Ky
•�..: --.yL.Y++'J 4F „�"�+-�•'1p•xrs-�'-".;7 .:r�� s� !:i'Xr+'q''•`�•sti
41 ; ; ►�
Ao
"`� :'. ems.: •- ..'.ti ' J ; : ;,.:;: _:
�_ :�1+•s�.` '•:;: �_ � .� "'�. ,. .ice Sr�.l {. rr�:;L� _
Wk
6
T
r
i
a
NK
.A' ••ry,•��'3.=."y!1�'. .'•p�" .: Y+ �' . ail• -]-^a'' i.Xi•" AlWy y�y.e• ,O f. .�'� � � ¢`y 1 -�' _'.^i{;jp+•� 'e'- � .ya,i - i. ri.'• �� a.r�,�i�?!�� � r:
"..
.jJ.,la►� y �L;.. � y • ;'� . �rr� 4W
F- +i d��i{.. �_ �• -1. if �•r ;•..;��3f -.• ..
Av
Z. .� %�}f• • J G J � - .r ►'. -- W4L.--a.�r war? � r.•' � - ,
' ICD
N N10' .9•.+Fw
r
'II
❑egret+*.
�HVde�g7r
x. 8M0.°5
6 ,l. P�A RpTy�•R � J
r f��''SS pbp9�CtiE KiIYI�Re ►[�[71�cF1
RKwr Muffm
gFJ.LYe Ho"
LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVER PARK
NARCD SITE
TR.I-PARK
MASTER -
PLAN
MY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PRp..] 6p: IGM t—L—pc AmbiuvA 1&.
SITE
ANALYSIS
�R �•`i K
Elp T. _.'.. .__ 9—+.--�. �._-___ '"'�-.�`�-.y r <. n k�.f/�. ..: � 3 MIFrJR • 760'
', p d `7 ❑ '±. �} Al1.a,vE>a { Y� '�a rL � re � � �.,� ' , l � n�ie� l
pY �I •�ti d a L`•. En ��� � tC . "•r,� T� ;`�p ---• ar.: ��: � i7�PC1CPb WeYn
E ,�" ONi6R"r REaroeHrj�{.
0 CT u p PA�BnE L+suse= moo"
C'4. - L7 r � ;;A „^'�r"Ty',� :� OF• LH1�1_ '[ s.. �.�'•5 f �
f �: � v '. ��� Q V•. i {'f�^ yW.1T RAS-'RiGTIC� :l ..
j []r1
,��
.. J {ilia'
Ifl
DRAFT Vision Statement:
Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco site to provide
compatible park, recreational and environmental opportunities that
compliment a variety of uses which meet community needs, promotes
environmental stewardship and creates a focus of community pride.
Planning Principles:
Address Social/Recreation/Utility/Transportation Needs
Conform with Regulatory Constraints
Achieve Sustainability
Promote Environmental Stewardship
Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare
These principles will serve as evaluation criteria for master plan alternatives
throughout the planning process.
Breakout Discussion:
•Review DRAFT Vision Statement
•Review Planning Principals
•Identify "Hopes" and "Fears" for project
Small Group Reports:
•Summarize your group's discussion
•Did the group have some key comments?
•What are your group's hopes and fears for the project?
Let's review tonight's discussion
Next Step:
Prepare Preliminary Plan Alternatives
Please join us at the Community Open House on April 18th,
7-9pm, at the Renton Community Center.
THANKS FOR COMING!
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Workshop Comment Summary
February 28, 2006
COMMENTS -Group No 1 & 2
• Consolidate each of the field (by sports) to create a new complex -style facilities
lighted Ron Regis -softball, Narco-soccer, Renton Community Center -Youth oriented
activities
• Opportunities for Youth
o Skate Park
o Climbing Wall
o Jump Park -Like Greenlake or Bellingham
o BMX Track
o Off -Leash Park
o Batting Cages
• Bar/Restaurant/Concession at fields
• Connecting walkways between parks
• More picnic shelters -family spaces
• "Story book" kids park -theme based walkway or path
• Bathrooms -well lit and stationary
COMMENTS -Group No 3 & 4
Unfortunately, none of the participants in the small group I participated in last night volunteered
to record the group's ideas. However, here is a summary of the key items I heard from the
community participants in our breakout group. (FYI, there were virtually no comments on the
draft vision statement or the planning principles, mainly just things people want.) more soccer
fields in a common location (separate from the softball fields for safety) with lights and field turf
more softball fields, again in a common location (separate from the soccer fields) with lights and
possibly with an all-weather surface a dirt bike jump park area, BMX bike racing track, and/or
bike park (like the current skate park) safety concerns about the new access road into/through the
Cedar River Park; how to avoid making it a thoroughfare/by-pass street concerns about traffic
flow/congestion from closing Houser Way (e.g., ability to increase traffic on Bronson Way given
limited bridge width/capacity over Cedar River at Mill Avenue intersection) more walking trails,
better connections (e.g., clearly defined path extending from Liberty Park, to Cedar River Park
and to the Cedar River Trail on the NARCO property) need to plan for more growth in sports and
more growth in population (both from in -City development and from annexations) - if City will
double in size potentially, need significantly more park space! lack of adequate fields/parks in
the Highlands/NE 3rd-4th Street corridor larger soccer and softball field complexes (at least four
fields each) to accommodate teams and tournaments support using (Spirit of Washington)
railroad right of way for walking and bike trail, and connect to Cedar River Trail make existing
Cedar River Trail wider where possible and provide a separate bike portion versus pedestrian
portion for improved safetyMatt Caldwell, one of the owners of the new GHY Bikes in Denny's
3rd & Well's building downtown, was in my group. He had numerous constructive suggestions,
but also shared privately that they would like to do more to work with the City or others to hold
BMX events in Renton. He said they already have done a couple events at the Renton
Motorcycle course that attracted over 1,000 people. Could be an opportunity for the Parks
Department to further develop something and/or maybe a Renton River Days activity?
As part of the brainstorming, one party asked if it was possible to secure the PACCAR land in
north Renton (at least on a temporary basis) for additional fields until PACCAR is ready to
sell/develop the land. I don't know what PACCAR's timing is, but it might be an option to
pursue.
Feel free to forward these comments to the facilitators for them to compile with the other
recorded worksheets last night. If you have any questions, please let me know. Mark Santos -
Johnson
COMMENTS -Group No 5& 6
Over -Riding Themes
1. Functionality
Softball/Soccer
• Fields -centralized maintenance
• 1 place for activities
• 1 place fields to hold tournaments
• Consolidate to a complex for tournaments/leagues
• Increase concessions/more revenue
Facilities are too spread out
2. Adequate field maintenance
• Safety on fields
• Safety at pool
• Improvement of Recreation Department -more gyms
• Community Center Youth Sports
3. Fears
• Increased programs with no increase in maintenance and operating budget
• Road too close to pool -safety
• Parking congestion?
4. Would like to see Narco soccer fields for different age groups
5. Consolidate the sports -soccer at one side and softball the other side
6. Crowded Basketball Courts?
7. BMX?
8. Teen Center is a good idea
9. Assoc Tournament's bring in $ for all of Renton
COMMENTS -Group No 7 & 8
Equal development of sports fields (soccer and softball) with limited thru traffic routed through
the parks.
Wishlist: 4-field softball complex & 4-field soccer complex
Vision Statement:
To develop our park system with the effort of maintaining a serene, safe recreation
opportunity — explore possibilities of increasing sports fields.
OTHER COMMENTS
Hello Bill,
I spoke with you last week about incorporating a disc golf course into the Narco property. During that
conversation you invited me to come to the meeting tonight to share my idea. I will not be able to attend
tonight. My sister is in the Army, currently home from Iraq and I have to leave town tomorrow for work.
So I am going to be spending tonight with her. Please do interpret my not showing up as a lack of interest
or desire for a disc golf course to be established on the Narco property. It's just that I see my sister 1-2
times a year right now.
I have included a few notes and thoughts about setting up a course. I collected these from a proposal
made by a club in San Francisco.
Brian Van Houten
There are now more than 600 Disc Golf courses in the United States and Canada, nearly all installed by
city and county parks departments. They have found that there are few recreational activities that offer
the high benefit -to -cost ratio of disc golf. Disc golf has low capital and maintenance costs, is
environmentally sound, is played year-round in all climates and is enjoyed immediately even by
beginners of all ages. Most courses are free to the public.
The cost of one disc can be as little as $10 at a local sporting goods store. A 3-pack starter kit through the
Professional Disc Golf Association (PDGA) is $28.95.
I have collected a few parts of a prior proposal for a course that was put together for the City of San
Francisco. There are also plenty of details on how to put a course together located on the PDGA website
http://www.pdga.com/makecrse.php. I ran down to the Narco property on Sunday and looked around. I
think a 9 hole course could be designed with little change to the property. If there was a desire to work
the hillside into the course a larger course could be designed.
Safety: A disc golf course at would increase foot traffic in the Park at random times during the day and
steadily during evenings and weekends. The influx of purposeful visitors would discourage the presence
of individuals who are only in the park to cause mischief and perhaps engage in crime. Areas that are
infrequently used and considered unsafe would be "opened -up" by the course. The installation of a disc
golf course has led to significant decreases in vandalism and litter as users have a stake in keeping the
course and surrounding area clean and well -kept.
Conservation: Disc golf is environment -friendly sport. Unlike traditional golf, a disc golf course does not
require that trees be cut down, fairways mowed and watered, plants uprooted or non-native species
planted. Rather, the course fits into the existing flora of the park. The impact of a disc golf course on the
surrounding area is minimal. Each hole would have multiple pin placements, ensuring that no one area
gets constant foot traffic (this has the added benefit of providing new challenges to players). In addition,
disc golfers as a group tend to take great pride in where they play, guaranteeing that the area taken up by
the disc golf course would be litter free. In the long-term, a disc golf course would also help in the
preservation of the park by giving young people in the neighborhood a stake in its preservation and
protection.
Economics: A deluxe 18-hole disc golf course with two sets of tees, professional signs and baskets can be
purchased and installed for around $25,000, less than the cost of a single tennis or basketball court. A 27-
hole course can accommodate 108 people at a time, as compared to a tennis court (4 maximum) or
basketball court (10 maximum).
What kind of construction?
The installation of a 18-hole disc golf course at Narco Park would involve the construction of tees and the
installation of signs and baskets.
Tees: Each hole would have two tees, a short one for novice players and a longer one for advanced
players. The novice tees would be made of concrete, the advanced tees would be made of concrete.
Concrete tees 4" thick measuring approximately 4' x10' would be built flush with the ground. A maximum
of 18 tees of this size would be required.
Baskets: Each hole would have a Mach III Disc Pole Hole target with a locking collar which would be set
in a cement hole measuring approximately 8" in diameter and 18-24" deep (technical specifications for
the installation of tees and baskets can be found in Annex IV). In addition, each hole would have 1-2
additional collars so that the basket could be moved to those locations periodically to avoid soil
compacting and erosion. Approximately 54 holes would need to be dug.
Signs: Tee signs are very important to help the first time user find his or her way through the course. Each
hole would have a sign indicating the hole number, length, recommended flight path and par. In addition,
a rules sign and information board near the first hole are strongly recommended. The signs can be
constructed with a variety of materials although we believe it would be preferable to construct signs with
a natural appearance to fit in with the surrounding area.
Partial list of cities with courses:
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Nashville, Tennessee (2)
Austin, Texas (5)
Orlando, Florida (8)
Bakersfield, California
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Berkeley, California
Phoenix -Tempe, Arizona (4)
Birmingham, Alabama
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Dallas-Ft.Worth, Texas (12)
Portland, Oregon (2)
Denver, Colorado
Raleigh -Durham, North Carolina (7)
Des Moines, Iowa (2)
Sacramento, California (7)
Chicago Metropolitan Area (10)
San Diego, California (2)
Cincinnati, Ohio (5)
Seattle, Washington (2)
Columbus, Ohio (3)
St. Louis, Missouri (2)
Houston, Texas (12)
Tulsa, Oklahoma (5)
Indianapolis, Indiana (4)
Tucson, Arizona
Kansas City, Kansas
Washington, DC Metropolitan Area (9)
Las Vegas, Nevada (3)
Wichita, Kansas (3)
Little Rock, Arkansas
Wilmington, Delaware (2)
Los Angeles, California Metropolitan (10)
Miami, Florida
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota (11)
Mobile, Alabama (5)
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Workshop Comment Summary
February 28, 2006
COMMENTS -Group No 1 & 2
• Consolidate each of the field (by sports) to create a new complex -style facilities
lighted Ron Regis -softball, Narco-soccer, Renton Community Center -Youth oriented
activities
• Opportunities for Youth
o Skate Park
o Climbing Wall
o Jump Park -Like Greenlake or Bellingham
o BMX Track
o Off -Leash Park
o Batting Cages
• Bar/Restaurant/Concession at fields
• Connecting walkways between parks
• More picnic shelters -family spaces
• "Story book" kids park -theme based walkway or path
• Bathrooms -well lit and stationary
COMMENTS -Group No 3 & 4
Unfortunately, none of the participants in the small group I participated in last night volunteered
to record the group's ideas. However, here is a summary of the key items I heard from the
community participants in our breakout group. (FYI, there were virtually no comments on the
draft vision statement or the planning principles, mainly just things people want.) more soccer
fields in a common location (separate from the softball fields for safety) with lights and field turf
more softball fields, again in a common location (separate from the soccer fields) with lights and
possibly with an all-weather surface a dirt bike jump park area, BMX bike racing track, and/or
bike park (like the current skate park) safety concerns about the new access road into/through the
Cedar River Park; how to avoid making it a thoroughfare/by-pass street concerns about traffic
flow/congestion from closing Houser Way (e.g., ability to increase traffic on Bronson Way given
limited bridge width/capacity over Cedar River at Mill Avenue intersection) more walking trails,
better connections (e.g., clearly defined path extending from Liberty Park, to Cedar River Park
and to the Cedar River Trail on the NARCO property) need to plan for more growth in sports and
more growth in population (both from in -City development and from annexations) - if City will
double in size potentially, need significantly more park space! lack of adequate fields/parks in
the Highlands/NE 3rd-4th Street corridor larger soccer and softball field complexes (at least four
fields each) to accommodate teams and tournaments support using (Spirit of Washington)
railroad right of way for walking and bike trail, and connect to Cedar River Trail make existing
Cedar River Trail wider where possible and provide a separate bike portion versus pedestrian
portion for improved safetyMatt Caldwell, one of the owners of the new GHY Bikes in Denny's
3rd & Well's building downtown, was in my group. He had numerous constructive suggestions,
but also shared privately that they would like to do more to work with the City or others to hold
BMX events in Renton. He said they already have done a couple events at the Renton
Motorcycle course that attracted over 1,000 people. Could be an opportunity for the Parks
Department to further develop something and/or maybe a Renton River Days activity?
As part of the brainstorming, one party asked if it was possible to secure the PACCAR land in
north Renton (at least on a temporary basis) for additional fields until PACCAR is ready to
sell/develop the land. I don't know what PACCAR's timing is, but it might be an option to
pursue.
Feel free to forward these comments to the facilitators for them to compile with the other
recorded worksheets last night. If you have any questions, please let me know. Mark Santos -
Johnson
COMMENTS -Group No 5& 6
Over -Riding Themes
1. Functionality
Softball/Soccer
• Fields -centralized maintenance
• 1 place for activities
• 1 place fields to hold tournaments
• Consolidate to a complex for tournaments/leagues
• Increase concessions/more revenue
Facilities are too spread out
2. Adequate field maintenance
• Safety on fields
• Safety at pool
• Improvement of Recreation Department -more gyms
• Community Center Youth Sports
3. Fears
• Increased programs with no increase in maintenance and operating budget
• Road too close to pool -safety
• Parking congestion?
4. Would like to see Narco soccer fields for different age groups
5. Consolidate the sports -soccer at one side and softball the other side
6. Crowded Basketball Courts?
7. BMX?
8. Teen Center is a good idea
9. Assoc Tournament's bring in $ for all of Renton
COMMENTS -Group No 7 & 8
Equal development of sports fields (soccer and softball) with limited thru traffic routed through
the parks.
Wishlist: 4-field softball complex & 4-field soccer complex
Vision Statement:
To develop our park system with the effort of maintaining a serene, safe recreation
opportunity — explore possibilities of increasing sports fields.
OTHER COMMENTS
Hello Bill,
I spoke with you last week about incorporating a disc golf course into the Narco property. During that
conversation you invited me to come to the meeting tonight to share my idea. I will not be able to attend
tonight. My sister is in the Army, currently home from Iraq and I have to leave town tomorrow for work.
So I am going to be spending tonight with her. Please do interpret my not showing up as a lack of interest
or desire for a disc golf course to be established on the Narco property. It's just that I see my sister 1-2
times a year right now.
I have included a few notes and thoughts about setting up a course. I collected these from a proposal
made by a club in San Francisco.
Brian Van Houten
There are now more than 600 Disc Golf courses in the United States and Canada, nearly all installed by
city and county parks departments. They have found that there are few recreational activities that offer
the high benefit -to -cost ratio of disc golf. Disc golf has low capital and maintenance costs, is
environmentally sound, is played year-round in all climates and is enjoyed immediately even by
beginners of all ages. Most courses are free to the public.
The cost of one disc can be as little as $10 at a local sporting goods store. A 3-pack starter kit through the
Professional Disc Golf Association (PDGA) is $28.95.
I have collected a few parts of a prior proposal for a course that was put together for the City of San
Francisco. There are also plenty of details on how to put a course together located on the PDGA website
http://www.pdga.com/makecrse.php. I ran down to the Narco property on Sunday and looked around. I
think a 9 hole course could be designed with little change to the property. If there was a desire to work
the hillside into the course a larger course could be designed.
Safety: A disc golf course at would increase foot traffic in the Park at random times during the day and
steadily during evenings and weekends. The influx of purposeful visitors would discourage the presence
of individuals who are only in the park to cause mischief and perhaps engage in crime. Areas that are
infrequently used and considered unsafe would be "opened -up" by the course. The installation of a disc
golf course has led to significant decreases in vandalism and litter as users have a stake in keeping the
course and surrounding area clean and well -kept.
Conservation: Disc golf is environment -friendly sport. Unlike traditional golf, a disc golf course does not
require that trees be cut down, fairways mowed and watered, plants uprooted or non-native species
planted. Rather, the course fits into the existing flora of the park. The impact of a disc golf course on the
surrounding area is minimal. Each hole would have multiple pin placements, ensuring that no one area
gets constant foot traffic (this has the added benefit of providing new challenges to players). In addition,
disc golfers as a group tend to take great pride in where they play, guaranteeing that the area taken up by
the disc golf course would be litter free. In the long-term, a disc golf course would also help in the
preservation of the park by giving young people in the neighborhood a stake in its preservation and
protection.
Economics: A deluxe 18-hole disc golf course with two sets of tees, professional signs and baskets can be
purchased and installed for around $25,000, less than the cost of a single tennis or basketball court. A 27-
hole course can accommodate 108 people at a time, as compared to a tennis court (4 maximum) or
basketball court (10 maximum).
What kind of construction?
The installation of a 18-hole disc golf course at Narco Park would involve the construction of tees and the
installation of signs and baskets.
Tees: Each hole would have two tees, a short one for novice players and a longer one for advanced
players. The novice tees would be made of concrete, the advanced tees would be made of concrete.
Concrete tees 4" thick measuring approximately 4' x10' would be built flush with the ground. A maximum
of 18 tees of this size would be required.
Baskets: Each hole would have a Mach III Disc Pole Hole target with a locking collar which would be set
in a cement hole measuring approximately 8" in diameter and 18-24" deep (technical specifications for
the installation of tees and baskets can be found in Annex IV). In addition, each hole would have 1-2
additional collars so that the basket could be moved to those locations periodically to avoid soil
compacting and erosion. Approximately 54 holes would need to be dug.
Signs: Tee signs are very important to help the first time user find his or her way through the course. Each
hole would have a sign indicating the hole number, length, recommended flight path and par. In addition,
a rules sign and information board near the first hole are strongly recommended. The signs can be
constructed with a variety of materials although we believe it would be preferable to construct signs with
a natural appearance to fit in with the surrounding area.
Partial list of cities with courses:
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Nashville, Tennessee (2)
Austin, Texas (5)
Orlando, Florida (8)
Bakersfield, California
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Berkeley, California
Phoenix -Tempe, Arizona (4)
Birmingham, Alabama
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Dallas-Ft.Worth, Texas (12)
Portland, Oregon (2)
Denver, Colorado
Raleigh -Durham, North Carolina (7)
Des Moines, Iowa (2)
Sacramento, California (7)
Chicago Metropolitan Area (10)
San Diego, California (2)
Cincinnati, Ohio (5)
Seattle, Washington (2)
Columbus, Ohio (3)
St. Louis, Missouri (2)
Houston, Texas (12)
Tulsa, Oklahoma (5)
Indianapolis, Indiana (4)
Tucson, Arizona
Kansas City, Kansas
Washington, DC Metropolitan Area (9)
Las Vegas, Nevada (3)
Wichita, Kansas (3)
Little Rock, Arkansas
Wilmington, Delaware (2)
Los Angeles, California Metropolitan (10)
Miami, Florida
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota (11)
Mobile, Alabama (5)
JGM
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
February 28, 2006
City Staff and Consultant Attendees:
Mark Santos -Johnson, EDNSP
Peter Renner, Community Services
Leslie Betlach, Park
Bill Rasmussen, Parks
David McNeal, JGM
Craig Lewis, JGM
Community Attendees:
See attached sign -in sheet.
The following materials were distributed:
• Community Workshop Agendas
• Small Group Discussion Guidelines
• Comment Recording Materials
The following materials were presented during the Powerpoint slide presentation:
• 1993 Cedar River Natural Zone Master Plan
• Drawing of the I-405/Cedar River Charrette
• Drawing of Park Access
• Aerial photo of existing condition to Renton Hill
• Aerial photo of Proposed Solution to Renton Hill
• Site Analysis Plan
Leslie Betlach introduced the city staff members in attendance and the consultants.
Dave McNeal reviewed the purpose of the workshop including the format of the small group
discussion groups. During the Powerpoint slide presentation Dave reviewed the background
information including the 1993 Master Plan and the WSDOT I-405 Charrette. Several site
images were included in the presentation.
Meeting Minutes (of February 28, 2006)
Page Two
Dave McNeal reviewed the Site Analysis Plan indicating proposed site access points developed
during the WSDOT I-405 Charrette effort. Other identified items indicated on the Site Analysis
Plan included the 100' Class 1 river buffer area, the open space deed restrictions on the Narco
Site, and the existing water well locations.
Small discussion groups were formed to review the DRAFT Vision Statement, Planning
Principles, identify the attendee's hopes and fears, and record their comments. Each group
selected a spokesperson to present the group's findings.
Summery of Group Findings: Several of the groups had similar comments that included
grouping of similar ballfield types to create separate softball and soccer complexes, use synthetic
turf surfacing and add lights, create more opportunities for youth -oriented activities, increase
path and walking trail connections, adding picnic shelters, maintain park -like feel to road system,
prevent traffic bypass route, add bike jump/BMX track area, provide high level of quality
facilities.
Future Meetings: The next Community Open House meeting is scheduled for April 18, 2006
from 7:00 to 9:00 PM at the Renton Community Center.
-End of Minutes-
JGM
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
MEETING MINUTES
March 2, 2006
From meeting with Jennifer Henning
Attendees:
Jennifer Henning, Development/Planning
David McNeal, JGM
Craig Lewis, JGM
The following materials were reviewed:
• Drawing of the I-405/Cedar River Charrette
• Drawing of Park Access
• Aerial photo of Existing Condition to Renton Hill
• Aerial photo of Proposed Solution to Renton Hill
• Hypothetical Sketch Plans of possible park improvements to Narco site
The discussion that followed is recorded here:
Dave briefly reviewed the master planning effort to date and presented the preliminary rough
sketches of possible park improvements to the Narco site. Dave indicated that we were now in
the process of developing alternative plans incorporating the comments received during the first
public workshop. Dave asked Jennifer for her assistance in determining what activities were
allowed, or not allowed, within the required set -back from the Cedar River.
Jennifer noted that the revised code requirements concerning Class 1 waters, which includes the
Cedar River, would be adopted soon. The primary revision in that code is the increase in the set-
back width to 100'. She indicated that this set -back was mainly applied to buildings and
structures. She indicated there are some provisions in the code that would allow for a reduction
in the set -back distance by 1/2, with a minimum 50' "no touch" distance from the river. Jennifer
confirmed that bridge crossing structures and paved trails would be allowed within the 100'
distance with possible mitigation measures required. She thought that a skate park facility
located below the I-405 bridge structures was an interesting idea and noted that there was a
proposed fish brood stock facility in this general area that needed to be addressed.
Jennifer noted the following potential issues with the proposed site improvements:
A. Spill -over light from any proposed sport field lighting is often a concern of the
surrounding community.
B. Archaeological investigations along the river may be required. Be aware that there is
a local individual who is watch -dogging this issue.
C. Biological Assessments will be required for potential impacts to the river.
Jennifer noted that code requirements concerning wetland buffers have provisions to allow soft
surface trails and certain stormwater facilities within the outer'/2 of the buffer.
Craig asked about stormwater runoff and treatment from the proposed parking area. Jennifer
noted that she was not really familiar with specific stormwater issues, but thought that other
projects this close to the river, or the lake, did not require the same level of detention. The usual
requirement was for adequate treatment prior to discharge.
Jennifer noted that there was a pending project to be located near the I-405/Cedar River crossing
that Seattle Public Utilities was requiring that involved placing a fish brood stock facility in a
portion of the river channel. The facility was seasonal with the facility lowering to the river
bottom during winter. Access to the river, trailer parking, public safety and a restroom for staff
were pending issues to be aware of.
Jennifer provided copies of the Pre -application Submittal Requirements for our use. She
welcomed the opportunity to review any alternative plans that are produced during the master
planning effort.
-End of Minutes-
L16E RTY P.h RIB
CF.I)nR RIVI R 3-ARK
ARrn 11TF
TRl-PARK
MASTER -
PLAN
['nvN� tiIRY SENICES
wrwlbl]MMwy.r��Y��
TRI-PARK STAFF MEETING MINUTES
March 6, 2006
Attendees: Dave McNeal
Jennifer Henning
Craig Lewis
Jerry Rerecich
Keith Woolley
Bill Rasmussen
Leslie Betlach
Michael Nolan
Mark Sanders -Johnson
Terry Flatley
Dave Reviewed workshop — comments received
• Cluster fields
• Not many comments of vision statement -go with it.
Bill Renton Riverdays - Future changes
Mark His group's discussion was youth oriented — Highlands — Field needs, Annex —
Increased population
Keith Reviewed I-405 impacts on city roadways in response to Dan Hemmingway's
email and workshop comments. Houser Way will be eliminated to public traffic.
Dan's comments and concerns were refuted as atypical due to roadway
maintenance and/or accident -related congestion. The'/2 interchange at Talbot will
mitigate Houser loss.
Mark River Days can use all three parks as venue — existing foot bridges will be
replaced by WSDOT. Train tracks will be realigned.
Keith WSDOT — fly over ramp in funding — other items 20-30 year master plan.
Dave Stoneway site acquisition by City is being considered/negotiated.
Terry Could the Cedar River Trail be realigned in places?
Dave Narco development/restrictions by King County (KC) grants will limit active
sports to 2 soccer fields
Mark Is there potential leverage to life the development restrictions? Should the City
consider purchasing the restriction (repay) to better serve Renton?
Leslie It would be good to have a ball field complex (4 fields) in the greenway.
Jerry Liberty Park has historic role of providing ball diamonds.
Bill The left field is short for baseball — there is currently no slow pitch scheduled in
Liberty Park.
Terry Could tournaments be accommodated with three diamonds and a forth in a
stadium nearby?
Jerry Ball diamonds: 90% adult softball April -October season. Soccer season is year
round. Field turf surface not good for River Days or other incidental use — fields
should be fenced.
Terry Field turf material has limitations. Should we consider field or 4 — what is the
demand?
Jerry Separate groups that pay.
Mark This master plan anticipates 20-30 year needs. KC restrictions are tying the
City's hands at the Narco Site.
Leslie Boeing property, Paccar, needs new. Leslie does not want to go to council
moving entry or give back money.
Jennifer Buffer should be maintained along the Cedar River in all development scenarios.
Terry Community Center expansion should be considered in master plan. Keep the new
road a park road —traffic calming is a must.
Keep it a park road — traffic calming
Leslie What about tennis courts? Answers were: double the number, relocate
them, there is no additional demand at this time. The basketball court is in almost
constant use.
Leslie The WSDOT Charrette suggested relocating the skate park next to teen center.
Issaquah's example suggests greater public visibility.
Jennifer In the shade of the I-405 bridges, the master plan should consider parking,
sculptural elements and an urban edge
Keith Emergency access and visual link are important to the success of skate parks.
Jerry Described "Teen" centers and various types of programs.
Terry Suggested Senior Center move to Liberty Park and the maintenance facility to the
Senior Center / Multi -age facility. Many responded coolly to this suggestion.
Jennifer Teen Center @ YMCA -partnering possibilities? Location — parking uses
Jerry Summer day camp program is based at Liberty Park.
Mark Downtown pavilion building: Mayor would like library there. Is there an
alternate use for the old library? The Highlands library is not adequate.
Mark Suggested an overall timeline would be helpful at the next workshop. In addition,
a statement of WSDOT, park needs and possible Stoneway site acquisition.
1
C(�Nil()Lllo Inc 4�ow
F, z s K 30 73 IS
1 "Ary
IY1t�n�s�oh�3�•�Q Gi tar��cna�R+.�
-LIz s t t44 u,s.
6127se& J
668- kk0cC ,fen{a",VA. us
&/6/7
C f�
U45m5
cr-AJ6(-6?m-jm&6gM
�44aw
-q--30-6406
M"r Vtn@G-vrhdvn.evKtis
In Attendance:
Members
Michael O'Donin,
Cynthia Burns
Ron Regis
Troy Wigestrand
Absent
Ralph Evans
Marge Richter
Tim Searing
City of Renton
Park Board Minutes
City Hall
1055 South Grady Way
Conferencing Center
March 14, 2006-4:30 p.m.
Staff
Chair Leslie Betlach
Kelly Beymer
Terry Flatley
Sandy Pilat
Jerry Rerecich
Others
Dave McNeal
CALL TO ORDER
Chair, Michael O'Donin, called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
An announcement was made that Ralph Evans resigned from the Board. Also
Ron Regis and Tim Searing's terms had expired. Ron indicated he would like to
renew for another term. Staff will check with Tim and forward information to the
Mayor's office.
PRESENTATION
Dave McNeal of JGM Landscaping introduced himself. He gave an overview of
the Tri-Park Master Plan that was presented at a community workshop two
weeks ago on February 28'". He explained the project purpose was to re -master
plan Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the Narco site to best meet the City of
Renton's park and recreational needs, protect the City's sole source aquifer and
incorporate future improvements to the 1-405 and SR169 corridors. This new
plan will reflect the dictates of the natural environment; recreational needs of
citizens, staff and elected officials; and park, utility and transportation
requirements. Slides were shown illustrating the existing access to Renton Hill
and proposed access. This master plan is being geared to serve the community
for the next 20-30 years. Some property purchased with grant money must be
used specifically per outlined use by grant (passive) opposed to having sports
fields. If we do not comply with grant requirements we would have to purchase
the land back at today's market value. Potential expansion of aquatic center and
phasing out of ballfields at Liberty Park were discussed. Leslie indicated we
would not lose any fields until we had a replacement field to accommodate the
leagues. Vision statement will be the focus of the Master Plan. Leslie indicated
one proposal for Liberty Park was a teen center, but there is a lot of discussion to
occur prior to any decisions being made.
At the Community Open House the attendees broken into groups. Their
comments were distributed. The common ground seemed to be describing
cluster like facilities and making the trail system seamless, Another open house
will be held from 7:00 — 9:00 p.m. at the Renton Community Center on April 18t"
The goal is to get as much public input as possible. Cynthia Burns and Ron
Regis thanked Dave for the presentation.
Leslie Betlach reviewed the consent agenda:
A. WRPA Aquatic Section, Lisa Greenmun, requested to hold the WRPA
Skill Builder for Aquatics, at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center on June
4t" from 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. and waiver of fees for use of the
facility. The fee would be $1,500. WRPA will waive the $20 class
charge for all City staff. Anticipated attendance by City staff would be
approximately 25 lifeguards. Staff recommends approval of this
request.
B. The VFW, Post #1263, has requested to use Teasdale Park on
Saturday, April 15, 2006, from 9:00 a.m. until 12 noon for an Easter
Egg Hunt. Anticipated attendance is 100-150 children. Staff
recommends approval of this request.
C. Betty Newman, Loyal 4H Dog Club, requested use of Riverview Park
and the Cedar River Trail on Saturday, May 13, 2006, from 8:00 a.m.
until 3:00 p.m. for a dog walk. This walk benefits King County Search
and Rescue Dogs and last year raised approximately $5,000. Staff
recommends approval of this $100 fee waiver contingent on supplying
an insurance certificate and completion of paperwork.
D. Margaret Harto, Kiwanis, submitted a request on behalf of Division 32,
to receive a partial refund for use of the Renton Community Center on
February 25, 2006. The group utilized the banquet facilities and three
meeting rooms. They have requested a refund of $450 for the meeting
rooms. Staff does not recommend authorizing a refund.
E. Al Siebert requested permission to stay at the tournament site of the
American Bass Association at Coulon Park on Saturday and Sunday,
July 29t" and 30t", and June 3rd and 4t" in his motor home. Staff
recommends approval; however, fees must be paid at pay box for
appropriate amount of time he is on site. (City cannot guarantee
availability of parking stalls).
F. Bohol Association of Washington State is having a potluck picnic at
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park on Sunday, April 16, 2006, for 100
people. They have requested to use a microphone for announcements
and an amplified sound for a karaoke system. Staff does not
recommend approval.
G. Deanna Isadore, Concessionaire at Liberty Park, requested an
extension of her 3-year contract for the concession stand. Staff
recommends approval of this request. (Concessionaire grossed
$4, 800 in 2005)
Jerry Rerecich, Acting Recreation Director, explained that Ms. Isadore invested a
considerable sum in an espresso maker. When the drive-thru chain, Big Foot
Java, opened across the street it considerably impacted her business. Despite
that, she still wishes a 3-year extension on her current contract. Cynthia Burns
made a motion seconded by Ron Regis to approve the consent agenda as
stated. She also asked Sandy to explain to the Kiwanis Club that in future they
would entertain a request for waiver of fees, but are unable to do that
retroactively. Ron Regis seconded the motion, all were in favor, motion carried.
Troy Wigestrand inquired about the free fishing day.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Cynthia Burns made a motion to approve the February minutes as written. Troy
Wigestrand seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion carried, minutes
approved.
ADJOURNMENTI
Troy Wigestrand made a motion seconded by Ron Regis to adjourn the meeting.
All were in favor, motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 5:46 p.m.
NEXT REGULAR MEETING
April 11, 2005 @ 4:30 pm
Room 511-5t" floor
e- r
,�.._ LIBERTY PARK
x;
CEDAR RIVER PAR w _
_ F ,
r �
NARCO SITE
r
TRI-PARK
MASTER.
PL,�--
CITY OF
COMMUNIT'
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc
1
F
AjML
- v-
r-
low -s-
_ ,.e� �'-M' .lam"R. � - f' C�j/�� �� /, - � �4 �� fir• �3'
��" <<,,n„ _.: I'd �; ,,�'�::�I + �^ :, • � - ; c �{�'? �y
. � . �,�'�:--'.� .'d. �s �;.: _ ,mow-...' - .�- � •�-a'. ��'
.. S �� '��rtiii'�i�. _ •ivies= -S. `.,�' �•' ti i..r _ _ k4-� 1 1. r �•;f .K �l .. J . '_�- -hT - _
..�e,•'.�'fr:J .��l.��J ��, ��J N�y•'r ��5',':l L � �1�:'� - '->zr F... � "5, -._•/
• � r � rJ...lr. ..r � � 'S �� F l•. ll.y M ,:ar�� r_. ':�lsfa'Yy
��� � �.i
�l i�
•.�.i�
�.!
� I
i
a
is
I
MFMlTL • 7R'
FS
1 srm >�
SOLAR.
<I ! '�bLY' P� _ - Grp. A]DB�d.E ■�fRiISE K4G��M
I •"..i � ��' j '4 .-�� �� 'nTOR4 dVCiYC � �__� -__-� `
/ d �- P ,i �h `F�._ � ` , a•GT FQ4' dq, ��O
G3 s ❑ K AU avEn t w
�' ❑ dam' Ck-� - 'rcrn/� t1:�.: �< �°�^ � '• J�'�
i d •Y .i F
F.�.r
'� _'., � e i„f�: 'il� e• � � TROP �xl.
o�reswy Me at.
1 t7 �.v L II y PAWNP- LSE: EA ` IV777
y,�Q
Yq yF ❑ er b.�l #,
+� �reeuro+'rj,.�
Ll
x
L1 I Q � UC"y � .- `PnFK "j�'wr mara- uiHa e"' �+•, v�� ""`i.1_�—....
Community Input
?J,,
• Cluster Sports Fields
• Trail Continuity
• Youth Activities
• Road: Maintain "Park"
Character
q
A Liberty �r
P,ark-
.` cedar
River
Park
41
Sto.
Pam. — _ 5to newsy
Site �-
�� q J man � •-� ��
ass Q
4 El
A CS
Narco Site
� 13 �7
�ntT fl, ��� 4a � •��ti d
Riverview
Park/
Cedar River Park
Narco Site
#1
"" '_"
N� '• � :�. sar.w yw i
4°
Liberty Park \ "�
"° �• — —
t� Park Alternatives
#1.
lA ]--'�E�
e.eu 10 01 UL
I DI J 9 #3 n•
` [Jberty
s..x Park,
aka :
�'
iver
L Park
e eo. A y/ 71 PR at6okstonoway
V JOsite
405
Narao Site
j" ra
"` � El- a IM
❑
Riverview
Park
Ig
Liberty' l
Park .
#R 1 l�VVV
Liberty
Park
#2
;'Cedar
River
Park
Bx _
Sto neway
Site
Narco Site
Liberty
Pk
#3�{ W " $k .
Pak j
Riverview`
Park jj��
i
pi
Liberty,y�
Park D
#2
Stq k
Liberty
Park
#1
cedar
River
.p
Stoneway
Site
Narap Site
Liberty
Park
#3
Riverview
Park
Libert Liberty Liberty
Park
Park Park
#3 #1 #2
An
River
e r da
Parks Y.adun
to
c;
Stonewway
Site
40
Cl
F7
L3
04 LF.
N
r-p
tp u
s
N�a-&o Site
zzRiverview �
405
I LI M
4�
Cedar Rivera
Cedar River
Park
Park
# 1
#2
Total Parking:
425 Spaces
,\FxIstIn% Parking:
240 paces
We
Total Parking:
540 Spaces
Parking!
r""i, 9spacas
240
N,kmq L74/
Narco Site
Riverview
Park �
Liberty Cedar River
Par
Cedar River
CII.bi
Park Park
W
#2 #1
T.f.1 P.rd.aQvan
Tolal Parking:540 Spaces
ExRan.lu, 425 Spaces
Existing Parking: Existing Parking:
240 Spaces T.0 Qn to 240 Spaco5
N
w4doa
d
tack.
_rW od �d. 13)
'1 13)
BFidg.
a
406
L3
'iV'a�r"ip Site
r
Lff
goN
v i e Riverview
1L\ Park
S
—Ce 8-
•si„inr i
r ra o'aae:.7 �.
BwurFrltlP [i7 PH,
On+w.�M1 L_ r
D.g
4Wa• J
y Narco Site
7Liberty
av
1 O� I � ark r � irrr
yJ Park
Cedar
Riveru.l.l,,,, k,
Park
�Narco Site LawdP.
43
R «. Stommay-
�' site
'ty lYai.P y
OIFLeaeS' •+r
dUSEl
q a y aa6ayu.7 . v. uPya� si !Kw !.m
/ v VcI 4T.Ir.•
mill
.� 4 O [7�� a 5ne.•Pwie. p7 R nyi •� Marco Site
'i #Q
NdrCO Site
v a'nd' r 0�7 CJ� Riverview
park
�• bi itr✓.w1.
C �
�� Fl •_,f �Il Nd+4 _ -
P�i r
�dlC7�It@y PP-j E_ #1
'
- — - — -
Liberty l �� ❑
Park
edar
rr,
;. .
t River
J F9M k J�
Narco Site
Site\\ i -
J
luN. y
F Z3
406 G r�rtinq L3 viid. F.a
{ ■r
rf v it
0 -. J r sa..ernrw.:� u•Y.,`jly, ,•
a of ' Marco Site
#4
N 1 as n Narco Site
a ° I #2 -
v a° q k d 40 `� d CJU Ri Park
rviav+r
k--
Narco Site v
Narco Site
2
CedY
Narco Site
Mretlax II
#4
a
NIM._u • ,� Nw.4
jf R...Ilprr.d
V.4W. l%... ,...�....� Tr�<
sue. +
�f
i
Nareo Site f' '°" r
q
Liberty
Park
•� V — � .Velar IS. SP.....
RiverSo[:e�f.�]s iSi N.r f Y
i Park
t�9 ] 14 aP:.:.f Naroo Site �.►.�
f ' 'I
h.l
5[on0way
Site
405 LP
r 4w 0 Ezr.r. 31.IC. l• �.l P.f u� NarCo Site.�f
.g , : b fl.a 1 Pk. y j 81w.r ~ #3
N 1 k°aa n Narco SiteEll
;f'
i\� a
v Riverview =
Park
0
��I
Liberty
Park kil PPfi
P..W- P. 11
M.d- �� �..l �.., I Coedar River
Llbn
Park
P.kl.g
10411 W% (3)
/ginCIO
p"mw
405 C3
DO
tn T..k
i-p
Marco Site M..d-
-4 -
s
0
Riverview
Park
Park Road Design Principles:
• Park Traffic Only
• Traffic Calming Measures:
• Alignment/Design
• Stop Signs
• Traffic Tables ("Raised" Intersections)
• Pedestrians Have Right - of - Way
Trail Design Principles:
• Continuity /Seamless
• Safety
• Emergency /Service Access
• Pedestrians Have Right - of -Way
1�r i
kA
Ir PA
AKM
ILP
TFP+ .e caifA7i�LfezFAF-
•t._
New Park Road Bridge Elevation - Looking Downstream
Tri-Park Master Plan, Renton WA
Schedule
• Tri-Park Master Planning Process
(Completion: Summer 2006)
• 1-405 Modifications
(Completion dependent on funding)
• Tri-Park Master Plan Implementation
(Multiple Phases -dependent on funding)
LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVER PAR
NARCO SITE:
TRI-PARK
y
��
MASTER.
-ow, ■ n, -w-
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES.
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc
Project Purpose:
Re -master plan Liberty Park.. Cedar River Park
and the Narco Site to accomplish the following:
• Best meet the City of Renton's park and recreational
needs
• Protect the City's sole source aquifer
• Incorporate future improvements to the 1-405 and SR
169 Corridors
• Reflect the dictates of the natural environment
• Provide opportunities for community events
• Meet park, utility and transportation requirements.
''II!
IV
MASTER PLAN
CEDAR RIVER TRAIL
-Natural Zone -
City cf Rolon Packs& Recreation Depadment
A$
. • p
kv
LIBERTY
;PARK CEDAR RIVER PARK
QNEWAY SITE _`"' l
MARC
SITE:7 - _-__
�rrr• a�
. -
. i
0
11:1 mlr""4
vz , tdvmrwm>
ftrrt9vw
AM
mr"
Schedule of Completion Dates
-405/I-5 to SR 169 -Nickel/TPA Funding (formerly Renton
Nickel)
-One lane each direction
-Benson Bridge
-SR 167 South Bound
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - January 2007
Est. Construction Completed - October 2009
1-405/SR515 Interchange - Nickel/TPA Funding
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - December 2010
Schedule of Completion Dates - Continued
-405 Renton to Bellevue (SR-169 to I-90) including South
Bound Flyover from I-405 to SR 169
RTID -ROW/Construction (Not funded, potential vote 2007)
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Sept. 2006
Est. Construction Completed - 2016
1-405/1-5 to SR 169 - Implementation Plan including Wells -
Parks -Renton Hill Access
No Funding Source Identified for ROW/Construction
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - 2023
_ q
A. MUSTtNA AeZOM
LtWERTY 13DAFiL
qp
Li • �.,,
errs
W
-Nora----
Ell
Rev
F, qa 0 a° NARGo
0 r-13 �_�
Access to Renton Hill
Existing Condition
Proposed Access
I
MFMlTL • 7R'
FS
1 srm >�
SOLAR.
<I ! '�bLY' P� _ - Grp. A]DB�d.E ■�fRiISE K4G��M
I •"..i � ��' j '4 .-�� �� 'nTOR4 dVCiYC � �__� -__-� `
/ d �- P ,i �h `F�._ � ` , a•GT FQ4' dq, ��O
G3 s ❑ K AU avEn t w
�' ❑ dam' Ck-� - 'rcrn/� t1:�.: �< �°�^ � '• J�'�
i d •Y .i F
F.�.r
'� _'., � e i„f�: 'il� e• � � TROP �xl.
o�reswy Me at.
1 t7 �.v L II y PAWNP- LSE: EA ` IV777
y,�Q
Yq yF ❑ er b.�l #,
+� �reeuro+'rj,.�
Ll
x
L1 I Q � UC"y � .- `PnFK "j�'wr mara- uiHa e"' �+•, v�� ""`i.1_�—....
Vision Statement:
Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the
Narco Site to provide compatible park, recreational
and environmental opportunities that complement
a variety of uses which:
• Meets the community's needs
• Promotes environmental stewardship
• Creates a focus of community pride
Planning Principles
• Address Social/Recreation/Utility/Transportation Needs
• Interdepartmental Coordination
• Conform with Regulatory Constraints
• Achieve Sustainability
• Promote Environmental Stewardship
• Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare
These principles will serve as evaluation criteria for master plan
alternatives throughout the planning process.
MASTER PLAN
N.r tea
Field Number Comparison
Design Considerations:
No net loss of fields by field type
Need by 2007* - 1 baseball and 4 soccer/football fields
Park
Liberty
Cedar River
Narco
Stoneway
Existing
2 lighted ballfields
1 soccer & 1 ballfield
Full Build Out Concept **
4 multi -use fields
(4 soccer, 4 rugby, 4
lacrosse, 3 cricket)
3 lighted ballfields
*As identified in the 2003 Long -Range Park, Recreation and
Open Space Implementation Plan
** 2007 shortfall is 1 ballfield, 1 soccer field
Tee
cem)
ket
n
e
Skate
a ki � �4 s Park
0 ce
Restro ms
Passive
Meado%
Exist Well
0
Shelter &,
Restrooms
0
New
-Pe'est:ria.n �,
Bridge
ell
New
Pedestri,
Bridge
r
I / \
- IINI,
Aquatic Center
Expansion
11.,.
11Ocrr
Bridge
00' Setback
Brood Stock
Collection +� Facility[ _;I
0
Next Steps
Open House - April 18
7pm - 9pm, Renton Community Center
Other
Interdepartmental Meetings
Second Open House in June (Date to be determined)
Park Board Presentations
Council Briefings
Final Draft
Council Approval - Estimated Summer 2006
Tri-Park Open House #1
April 18, 2006
.40a
�.
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I)AR RI%'i • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MASTED
PLAN
C_n Rl lw
C MtNIT, SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SUMMARY OF OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS
April 18, 2006
Revised May 9, 2006
The following attendee comments are recorded here exactly as they were submitted:
LIBERTY PARK:
• Makes more sense -how fields are divided. The skate park and teen center are a bonus.
• Looks good in the concept photo.
• The idea of the Teen Center is a really good idea.
• I like the teen center addition that will help teens become more involved with their community.
• I like the idea of the teen center and an amphitheater in the park is another good idea.
• More kid areas? More picnic areas.
• Teen Center expansion is an awesome idea. A gym and exercise room for teens would be awesome.
• Looks good.
• Have strong wi-fi in picnic areas. Will road next to I-405 be one-way or two-way?
• The tennis courts are a nice feature to keep. The other sites might enjoy it too, if space allowed.
• I like the stadium concept at the present site. Put effort in to high quality fields.
• It looks good to me.
• More Basketball.
• I like the way that the new park is set up. I think the play area should be bigger and with swings.
• Is there something you can put in the meadow?
• I like all the parking. Is the "passive meadow" important? Can't it be a sports field with something?
• More tennis courts. They are almost always full.
• I like the location of the teen center next to the library.
• I like the idea of creating a teen center and adding an open space to it -amphitheater would be awesome.
• I like the idea of having a teen center added for teens in future generations to use.
• Build the tennis courts quick!
• I do not want to see baseball fields replaced by soccer fields -if soccer fields are put in, new softball fields
need to be also.
• I like moving the skate park to a visible area.
• I like it.
• I like how we are keeping the library, adding a huge lawn space, adding three tennis courts and keeping the
skate park.
• Passive meadow ... not a tennis court?
CEDAR RIVER PARK:
• Looks good in the concept photo.
• I like the idea of the expansion of the water park and the RCC expansion.
• I'm very excited about the aquatic center and RCC expansions, which I believe will have a very positive
impact on our community.
• I don't like how the ball fields are close together. I play baseball but that sound leads to injury.
• Lighted tennis?
• I like the two bridges (one pedestrian only) connecting with Narco Site across Cedar River.
• Have movie screening capability at outdoor party room.
• I definitely like how the Narco Site and Cedar River Park are connected by footbridges for teens and city
members for easy travel by foot.
• I like the three softball fields in the Stoneway property.
• I think the water park is being expanded, and I like that the ball fields are going to be replaced.
• There is not a lot of change, but I agree with the expansion of the aquatic center.
• Not much seems to be proposed, but expansion on a growing aquatic center is always a good thing.
• I like the aquatic center and community center expansions.
• The ball fields would be good use of empty space.
• I think expanding the aquatic center is a good idea as well as the baseball fields. A lot of people use the
water park, so make it bigger.
• Make the water park really BIG! Maybe put in a lap pool for year round use.
• Excellent idea to expand Aquatic Center, great for area youth!
• I must protest the double fee for the aquatic center for non -Renton addresses. My address is Seattle, but I
pay Renton school taxes, I work in Renton, I shop in Renton, I go to the dentist in Renton, etc. I don't
mind paying a few dollars more, but double is totally unfair as my family has supported Renton in every
other way. So far, we have boycotted the Aquatic Center and have chosen to go to Wild Waves where all
are equal - and so have many of our friends and neighbors.
• 3 ball fields are nice, but would like to see the fields all down SR 169 at Ron Regis.
• I like it.
• I love how we still have baseball fields, and extension to the Aquatic Center, more parking and connecting
bridge to Narco Site.
NARCO SITE:
• More "passive" space would be nice. Concern: Allowing cars (a lot of them) so close to the trail, and
adding a new bridge over the river for traffic will make it less safe for bikers and walkers.
• Living in south King County, I am pleased to see opportunities for youth. I ride bikes and look forward to
the opportunity to have a bike park. In my experience, these parks represent a safe, fun and healthy
environment.
• I like the options for youth individual sports -skate parkibike park.
• For the passive/active area -I am pleased to see the option for a bike/BMX area. I think there is plenty of
interest in the Renton area to utilize this land well. Many kids are involved in non -team sports and
including a bike area in the park will give them a safe place to ride. I think the bike park should include
jumps and freestyle -related terrain to give riders the riding options they are looking for. Because a skate
park is already included in the Master Plan, I don't believe there would be any additional insurance issues.
Thank you for taking these ideas into account!
• I attended the first meeting and am very glad I did. It is good to see the City planners and officials looking
toward the future of the City of Renton. Having lived here 32 years and buying my first house in Renton
this last year, I am very interested in the places my children will be frequenting for their childhood years. I
would like to see more progressive sports in our city, knowing that younger families are moving in. Dirt
jumping parks, skate parks, climbing walls and other features like this will make Renton a place where
more families will want to move to.
• I really like the multi -purpose fields.
• I like that the trail will still be there and I like the climbing wall.
• I really like the multi -purpose fields.
• I like the idea, but this puts a lot of kids out of sports due to lack of fields at Cedar River Park.
• Trailheads into the woods with maintained soft -surface trails within the Cedar River greenbelt. Trail
connections from Renton Hill, at the bottom of Renton Ave, directly to the Narco Site (near present
trailhead parking lot for Cedar River Trail). In addition to providing park access for Renton Hill, would
also provide downtown and library access once the Renton and Cedar Avenue bridges are reconfigured as
per the full I-405 project.
• More picnic areas. It is good to see the incorporation of non -team sports in the Master Plan. (After
attending the first meeting.)
• Everything seems spread out.
• I like the isolation from noise pollution. A possibility is to separate the parks to suit personalities. Narco
could be the quiet park, due to its traffic isolated location. This would be for people who want somewhere
to read or sit down and do some work on their laptop with wi-fi. This isolated location is perfect for that.
The other parks can concentrate on youth and teens, and one could target adults.
• The ball and soccer fields are pretty spread out but it looks well planned with footbridges to the othcr
venues.
• I would like to see one or two of the fields lined for football use -We could use it for practices and games.
There are two jr. football and cheer programs in Renton that need their own practice facilities with lights
August thru November. Fields should be artificial turf -not grass.
• Multi -use fields are good, but there should be a variety of other activities, because right now, it just seems
like fields.
• I like the new pedestrian bridge.
• I like the idea of multi -use fields and picnic sites.
• I like the climbing wall for potential area options.
• Like the idea of a climbing wall and BMX area. Why is Liberty Park the only place to play tennis?
• Three extra fields is a smart idea.
• Build the soccer fields quick! With turf! Put places to buy food and refreshments in.
• I like very much the usage abilities set up by the 3 softball and four soccer field setup. It is a must to have
the field turf fields available in this area for not only soccer but football and lacrosse as well. As you know,
soccer in the area is growing at a tremendous rate. We've had 15% growth over these past two years and
we expect more this year. The lack of field space is already an issue and it only will be worse in the
coming years. My one major point and suggestion, is while you are working on the Tri-Park plan, please
consider finishing the job at Ron Regis Park. You could quickly add the 2nd soccer and softball fields that
were planned in 1993 and never completed. If Field Turf were added on the soccer fields, with lights, there
would be quite a revenue opportunity to be able to help re -capture some of those initial costs. Please
understand that the need for youth/adult fields, especially for soccer in the Renton area, is desperate. Let's
finish Regis now to help stem the tide of completion of the Tri-Park Plan. Thanks!
• Put four soccer fields here and put four softball fields at Ron Regis along with concession and beer sales.
• I like it.
• I love how we have three soccer fields, more open space, and a place for bike park, climbing wall, etc... I
think all concepts are great. We are offering more options for people and allowing people with all different
passions to enjoy downtown Renton. Although we are moving things around, we are connecting two large
sites together by a road over the river and they will all be located close together which is not an
inconvenience to others.
VERBAL COMMENTS:
• Many are concerned with the possibility of cut -through traffic on the proposed road through Cedar River
Park and the Narco Site.
OTHER:
• As a long time, frequent user of Renton parks, the plans all look good, planning for best use of land,
considering near future growth in Renton's population.
• Please do everything possible to keep the dinner train.
• Overall, very nice planning. I particularly like the Narco Site and Cedar River Park combination.
• Any chance of getting a covered swimming pool?
• I would like to see additional sand volleyball courts added to any of these locations.
• Block off Seattle water service road from Royal Hills to River so that no motorized vehicles can access.
Eliminate stop light at Shary's Restaurant to eliminate congestion.
• I am concerned about the "high -density" possible apartments at the current Riviera Site and the impact on
river for the salmon and heron. Parking -is it enough for all the sports fields?
• Ron Regis is our current best resource. It needs to be developed to help with our immediate needs.
• I do not want any interruptions in the Cedar River Trail system -needs to be continuous for bikers and
runners.
• I jotted a few comments last night on the form but must have gotten sidetracked.
I don't remember turning it in to anybody but didn't bring it home with me. It was probably left lying
around somewhere so hopefully it got picked up. If not, this email re -summarizes (in greater detail) my
comments, and also adds a few more that have come to mind since then.
It would be nice to have a direct pedestrian connection (trail) from the
bottom of Renton Hill, near Renton Avenue at the top of the I-405 bridge,
down to the Tri-Parks area. The preferable location for the bottom end of
the trail would be near the present trailhead parking for the Cedar River
Trail. From this location, one could head east into the Narco site, cross
the river at the pedestrian bridge over to the north bank parks, or head west
along the Narco access road towards downtown. Note there is already somewhat
of a steep trail connecting these two points, along the area recently eroded
by a surcharged catchbasin. A formalized trail with ADA access would have to
veer east and then double -back to follow a more gradual gradient, with a
possible separate connection directly to Narco. A set of stairs could
replace the existing informal trail but of course wouldn't provide ADA
access. See attached file for clarification. In addition to providing
access from the Renton Hill neighborhood to the parks, this would also be an
important pedestrian connection to downtown. The proposed re-routing of the
Renton Avenue bridge over I-405 from its present connection at Mill and
Houser to S. 4th and Main, will eliminate (or at least significantly
lengthen) a direct and well -used pedestrian connection from Renton Hill to
downtown and the Library.
The very first figure posted as you walked into the open house was the
early-90's vintage conceptual plan for the Narco site and tri-parks area.
This figure promotes a network of (presumably) soft -surface trails within the
Cedar River greenbelt. I would like to throw my support behind development
of such a trail system within this area. As you know, there are indeed some
existing trails within this area, which are shown (to the best of my
estimation) on the second attached airphoto graphic. The problem lies
however in the new housing development that went in off of Royal Hill Drive.
As is evident from the airphoto, this development has cutoff and disconnected
the majority of the trails that exist(ed) in the area. As a result, the
trails have become less accessible, and many of the trail segments are
becoming grown over and disappearing due to disuse. The development has
generally not provided any access points to these trails, at the points where
they have been cutoff. The trails just simply end, and I'm not sure many
residents there are even aware of them (they aren't obvious from inside the
development). As a solution, in addition to providing some access points (or
in lieu of), new trail connections could be developed around the perimeter of
the housing development which would reconnect the cutoff trails.
More relevant to Narco and the tri-parks, you can also see from the airphoto
that there is a fairly large expanse of greenbelt further to the west of
these trails and closer to Narco, that does not include any trails. Although
some of this land has steep slopes, there are significant areas here that
could accomodate soft -surface trails. This would provide beneficial
recreational opportunity to the Narco site beyond just ball and sports
fields, and could also provide connections into the existing network of
trails. The only access point from the bottom of the hill (i.e. along the
Cedar River Trail) into the current trail network is at Riverview Park, and
this access point is seasonably wet and difficult to manage.
Consider a soft -surface trail along the south river bank and generally
parallel to the paved Cedar River Trail, providing an alternative to the
Cedar River Trail within the Narco site. Optionally, a similar trail on the
north bank beginning in Cedar River Park and continuing upstream through the
Merlino property (if acquired).
Bridges across the Cedar River to connect Narco to the north bank parks are
important. I like the idea of the new bridge connection, as well as
maintaining (or replacing) the existing pedestrian/bike bridge under I-405.
A playground area for kids (slides, climbing, swings -- the usual) might be
nice near the east end of the tri-parks area, on one side of the river or the
other. This becomes some distance from the existing play area at the west
end in Liberty Park, and could probably be smaller scale than the one there.
MERTY PARK
CPA)AR RIVI R 3-ARK
NAR( MTr
TRl-PARK
MASTER -
PLAN
('nvy� vIRY SF.RYICF-�
TRI-PARK STAFF MEETING MINUTES
May 31, 2006
Attendees: Dave McNeal Terry Higashiyama
Craig Lewis Jerry Rerecich
Keith Woolley Bill Rasmussen
Leslie Betlach Michael Nolan
Mark Santos -Johnson Terry Flatley
Sonja Mejlaender
JGM Presented PowerPoint slideshow of Tri-Park concept plans for comment.
Leslie Indicated that the next presentation to the public was June 28th for the second
scheduled open house.
Keith Reviewed current status and timing of WSDOT projects. Keith indicated he may
be able to provide an electronic version of the latest WSDOT Phasing Plan.
Sidney There was some confusion as to where these parks were located in relationship to
roadways. Sidney noted that good visual access of skate park facilities from
roadways is important.
Mark Suggested that a slide be added to the presentation, or add something to each
concept plan, that helps to clarify the anticipated time line for that phase of park
development.
Mark Regarding the Narco Site and the Renton/ King County purchase agreement.
Mark noted that additional costs associated with a required buyback penalty for
developing four (4) multi -purpose sports fields at the Narco site would be less
than buying additional land elsewhere for the same purpose. He feels that the
Narco Site should be fully developed due to it's location and flat topography.
Other comments received:
Add additional picnic facilities to parks.
Allow for future expansion of Carco Theater lobby and fly loft.
Add existing and proposed parking counts to park concept plans.
Add round -about to park road intersection to slow and calm traffic flow.
Provide open grated sections at bridge ends or add lights for increased security.
-End of Minutes-
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I)AR RI%'i • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MASTED
PLAN
C_n Rl lw
C MtNIT, SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SUMMARY OF OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS
April 18, 2006
Revised May 9, 2006
The following attendee comments are recorded here exactly as they were submitted:
LIBERTY PARK:
• Makes more sense -how fields are divided. The skate park and teen center are a bonus.
• Looks good in the concept photo.
• The idea of the Teen Center is a really good idea.
• I like the teen center addition that will help teens become more involved with their community.
• I like the idea of the teen center and an amphitheater in the park is another good idea.
• More kid areas? More picnic areas.
• Teen Center expansion is an awesome idea. A gym and exercise room for teens would be awesome.
• Looks good.
• Have strong wi-fi in picnic areas. Will road next to I-405 be one-way or two-way?
• The tennis courts are a nice feature to keep. The other sites might enjoy it too, if space allowed.
• I like the stadium concept at the present site. Put effort in to high quality fields.
• It looks good to me.
• More Basketball.
• I like the way that the new park is set up. I think the play area should be bigger and with swings.
• Is there something you can put in the meadow?
• I like all the parking. Is the "passive meadow" important? Can't it be a sports field with something?
• More tennis courts. They are almost always full.
• I like the location of the teen center next to the library.
• I like the idea of creating a teen center and adding an open space to it -amphitheater would be awesome.
• I like the idea of having a teen center added for teens in future generations to use.
• Build the tennis courts quick!
• I do not want to see baseball fields replaced by soccer fields -if soccer fields are put in, new softball fields
need to be also.
• I like moving the skate park to a visible area.
• I like it.
• I like how we are keeping the library, adding a huge lawn space, adding three tennis courts and keeping the
skate park.
• Passive meadow ... not a tennis court?
CEDAR RIVER PARK:
• Looks good in the concept photo.
• I like the idea of the expansion of the water park and the RCC expansion.
• I'm very excited about the aquatic center and RCC expansions, which I believe will have a very positive
impact on our community.
• I don't like how the ball fields are close together. I play baseball but that sound leads to injury.
• Lighted tennis?
• I like the two bridges (one pedestrian only) connecting with Narco Site across Cedar River.
• Have movie screening capability at outdoor party room.
• I definitely like how the Narco Site and Cedar River Park are connected by footbridges for teens and city
members for easy travel by foot.
• I like the three softball fields in the Stoneway property.
• I think the water park is being expanded, and I like that the ball fields are going to be replaced.
• There is not a lot of change, but I agree with the expansion of the aquatic center.
• Not much seems to be proposed, but expansion on a growing aquatic center is always a good thing.
• I like the aquatic center and community center expansions.
• The ball fields would be good use of empty space.
• I think expanding the aquatic center is a good idea as well as the baseball fields. A lot of people use the
water park, so make it bigger.
• Make the water park really BIG! Maybe put in a lap pool for year round use.
• Excellent idea to expand Aquatic Center, great for area youth!
• I must protest the double fee for the aquatic center for non -Renton addresses. My address is Seattle, but I
pay Renton school taxes, I work in Renton, I shop in Renton, I go to the dentist in Renton, etc. I don't
mind paying a few dollars more, but double is totally unfair as my family has supported Renton in every
other way. So far, we have boycotted the Aquatic Center and have chosen to go to Wild Waves where all
are equal - and so have many of our friends and neighbors.
• 3 ball fields are nice, but would like to see the fields all down SR 169 at Ron Regis.
• I like it.
• I love how we still have baseball fields, and extension to the Aquatic Center, more parking and connecting
bridge to Narco Site.
NARCO SITE:
• More "passive" space would be nice. Concern: Allowing cars (a lot of them) so close to the trail, and
adding a new bridge over the river for traffic will make it less safe for bikers and walkers.
• Living in south King County, I am pleased to see opportunities for youth. I ride bikes and look forward to
the opportunity to have a bike park. In my experience, these parks represent a safe, fun and healthy
environment.
• I like the options for youth individual sports -skate parkibike park.
• For the passive/active area -I am pleased to see the option for a bike/BMX area. I think there is plenty of
interest in the Renton area to utilize this land well. Many kids are involved in non -team sports and
including a bike area in the park will give them a safe place to ride. I think the bike park should include
jumps and freestyle -related terrain to give riders the riding options they are looking for. Because a skate
park is already included in the Master Plan, I don't believe there would be any additional insurance issues.
Thank you for taking these ideas into account!
• I attended the first meeting and am very glad I did. It is good to see the City planners and officials looking
toward the future of the City of Renton. Having lived here 32 years and buying my first house in Renton
this last year, I am very interested in the places my children will be frequenting for their childhood years. I
would like to see more progressive sports in our city, knowing that younger families are moving in. Dirt
jumping parks, skate parks, climbing walls and other features like this will make Renton a place where
more families will want to move to.
• I really like the multi -purpose fields.
• I like that the trail will still be there and I like the climbing wall.
• I really like the multi -purpose fields.
• I like the idea, but this puts a lot of kids out of sports due to lack of fields at Cedar River Park.
• Trailheads into the woods with maintained soft -surface trails within the Cedar River greenbelt. Trail
connections from Renton Hill, at the bottom of Renton Ave, directly to the Narco Site (near present
trailhead parking lot for Cedar River Trail). In addition to providing park access for Renton Hill, would
also provide downtown and library access once the Renton and Cedar Avenue bridges are reconfigured as
per the full I-405 project.
• More picnic areas. It is good to see the incorporation of non -team sports in the Master Plan. (After
attending the first meeting.)
• Everything seems spread out.
• I like the isolation from noise pollution. A possibility is to separate the parks to suit personalities. Narco
could be the quiet park, due to its traffic isolated location. This would be for people who want somewhere
to read or sit down and do some work on their laptop with wi-fi. This isolated location is perfect for that.
The other parks can concentrate on youth and teens, and one could target adults.
• The ball and soccer fields are pretty spread out but it looks well planned with footbridges to the othcr
venues.
• I would like to see one or two of the fields lined for football use -We could use it for practices and games.
There are two jr. football and cheer programs in Renton that need their own practice facilities with lights
August thru November. Fields should be artificial turf -not grass.
• Multi -use fields are good, but there should be a variety of other activities, because right now, it just seems
like fields.
• I like the new pedestrian bridge.
• I like the idea of multi -use fields and picnic sites.
• I like the climbing wall for potential area options.
• Like the idea of a climbing wall and BMX area. Why is Liberty Park the only place to play tennis?
• Three extra fields is a smart idea.
• Build the soccer fields quick! With turf! Put places to buy food and refreshments in.
• I like very much the usage abilities set up by the 3 softball and four soccer field setup. It is a must to have
the field turf fields available in this area for not only soccer but football and lacrosse as well. As you know,
soccer in the area is growing at a tremendous rate. We've had 15% growth over these past two years and
we expect more this year. The lack of field space is already an issue and it only will be worse in the
coming years. My one major point and suggestion, is while you are working on the Tri-Park plan, please
consider finishing the job at Ron Regis Park. You could quickly add the 2nd soccer and softball fields that
were planned in 1993 and never completed. If Field Turf were added on the soccer fields, with lights, there
would be quite a revenue opportunity to be able to help re -capture some of those initial costs. Please
understand that the need for youth/adult fields, especially for soccer in the Renton area, is desperate. Let's
finish Regis now to help stem the tide of completion of the Tri-Park Plan. Thanks!
• Put four soccer fields here and put four softball fields at Ron Regis along with concession and beer sales.
• I like it.
• I love how we have three soccer fields, more open space, and a place for bike park, climbing wall, etc... I
think all concepts are great. We are offering more options for people and allowing people with all different
passions to enjoy downtown Renton. Although we are moving things around, we are connecting two large
sites together by a road over the river and they will all be located close together which is not an
inconvenience to others.
VERBAL COMMENTS:
• Many are concerned with the possibility of cut -through traffic on the proposed road through Cedar River
Park and the Narco Site.
OTHER:
• As a long time, frequent user of Renton parks, the plans all look good, planning for best use of land,
considering near future growth in Renton's population.
• Please do everything possible to keep the dinner train.
• Overall, very nice planning. I particularly like the Narco Site and Cedar River Park combination.
• Any chance of getting a covered swimming pool?
• I would like to see additional sand volleyball courts added to any of these locations.
• Block off Seattle water service road from Royal Hills to River so that no motorized vehicles can access.
Eliminate stop light at Shary's Restaurant to eliminate congestion.
• I am concerned about the "high -density" possible apartments at the current Riviera Site and the impact on
river for the salmon and heron. Parking -is it enough for all the sports fields?
• Ron Regis is our current best resource. It needs to be developed to help with our immediate needs.
• I do not want any interruptions in the Cedar River Trail system -needs to be continuous for bikers and
runners.
• I jotted a few comments last night on the form but must have gotten sidetracked.
I don't remember turning it in to anybody but didn't bring it home with me. It was probably left lying
around somewhere so hopefully it got picked up. If not, this email re -summarizes (in greater detail) my
comments, and also adds a few more that have come to mind since then.
It would be nice to have a direct pedestrian connection (trail) from the
bottom of Renton Hill, near Renton Avenue at the top of the I-405 bridge,
down to the Tri-Parks area. The preferable location for the bottom end of
the trail would be near the present trailhead parking for the Cedar River
Trail. From this location, one could head east into the Narco site, cross
the river at the pedestrian bridge over to the north bank parks, or head west
along the Narco access road towards downtown. Note there is already somewhat
of a steep trail connecting these two points, along the area recently eroded
by a surcharged catchbasin. A formalized trail with ADA access would have to
veer east and then double -back to follow a more gradual gradient, with a
possible separate connection directly to Narco. A set of stairs could
replace the existing informal trail but of course wouldn't provide ADA
access. See attached file for clarification. In addition to providing
access from the Renton Hill neighborhood to the parks, this would also be an
important pedestrian connection to downtown. The proposed re-routing of the
Renton Avenue bridge over I-405 from its present connection at Mill and
Houser to S. 4th and Main, will eliminate (or at least significantly
lengthen) a direct and well -used pedestrian connection from Renton Hill to
downtown and the Library.
The very first figure posted as you walked into the open house was the
early-90's vintage conceptual plan for the Narco site and tri-parks area.
This figure promotes a network of (presumably) soft -surface trails within the
Cedar River greenbelt. I would like to throw my support behind development
of such a trail system within this area. As you know, there are indeed some
existing trails within this area, which are shown (to the best of my
estimation) on the second attached airphoto graphic. The problem lies
however in the new housing development that went in off of Royal Hill Drive.
As is evident from the airphoto, this development has cutoff and disconnected
the majority of the trails that exist(ed) in the area. As a result, the
trails have become less accessible, and many of the trail segments are
becoming grown over and disappearing due to disuse. The development has
generally not provided any access points to these trails, at the points where
they have been cutoff. The trails just simply end, and I'm not sure many
residents there are even aware of them (they aren't obvious from inside the
development). As a solution, in addition to providing some access points (or
in lieu of), new trail connections could be developed around the perimeter of
the housing development which would reconnect the cutoff trails.
More relevant to Narco and the tri-parks, you can also see from the airphoto
that there is a fairly large expanse of greenbelt further to the west of
these trails and closer to Narco, that does not include any trails. Although
some of this land has steep slopes, there are significant areas here that
could accomodate soft -surface trails. This would provide beneficial
recreational opportunity to the Narco site beyond just ball and sports
fields, and could also provide connections into the existing network of
trails. The only access point from the bottom of the hill (i.e. along the
Cedar River Trail) into the current trail network is at Riverview Park, and
this access point is seasonably wet and difficult to manage.
Consider a soft -surface trail along the south river bank and generally
parallel to the paved Cedar River Trail, providing an alternative to the
Cedar River Trail within the Narco site. Optionally, a similar trail on the
north bank beginning in Cedar River Park and continuing upstream through the
Merlino property (if acquired).
Bridges across the Cedar River to connect Narco to the north bank parks are
important. I like the idea of the new bridge connection, as well as
maintaining (or replacing) the existing pedestrian/bike bridge under I-405.
A playground area for kids (slides, climbing, swings -- the usual) might be
nice near the east end of the tri-parks area, on one side of the river or the
other. This becomes some distance from the existing play area at the west
end in Liberty Park, and could probably be smaller scale than the one there.
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I-R RIi • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MA5TEK
PLAN
C-n Rl lw
C MtNIT, SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Park Board Meeting #2
The modified conceptual plans were presented to the Board and a favorable discussion followed.
One of the newly updated slides was a parking summary for all three park components. The
parking counts were based on simultaneous facility and area use projections for a typical summer
weekend. One board member asked about accommodating River Days parking demand on site.
Other members quickly countered, expressing their concern that to design for peak parking
demand would destroy the reason people come to the park in the first place. Other board
members concurred with the consultant's approach or basis for sizing the parking facilities.
Comment from Troy Wigestrand:
With all the new parking, and lots of activities going on at the Community Center, pool, Carco Theater and
ball fields, traffic will continue to be a challenge in the parking areas. It's a real bottle neck at times
currently only having two entrances/exits, and I'd like to recommend that we add a couple more car access
and exits points than what's currently being planned for.
Dream request: move the current pool location and switch it with one of the ball fields being planned near
the river. (yeah, I know: pipe dream, but thought I'd throw it out there anyway).
Please add a multi purpose field at Liberty (in part of the area that is being planned for being left as just a
grassy field) that can be used for small family base ball games, or casual soccer games, etc.
END OF REPORT
LIBERTY PARK
CEDAR RIVER PAR
NARCO SITE:
TRI-PARK
y
��
MASTER.
-ow, ■ n, -w-
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES.
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc
Review - Cedar River Greenway Master Plan
• Master Plan for area located between existing Liberty
Park east to Renton's City limits at Orcas Ave.
• First Plan developed and adopted in the mid 80's. Plan
reflected existing City -owned properties and
opportunities for future development, expansion &
acquisition.
• Second Plan publicly reviewed, revised and adopted in
1993.
• 57 Acre Narco property identified as part of plan was
acquired in 1993 utilizing several funding sources.
• The Cedar River Trail was identified as part of this plan.
This major trail is part of a much larger trail network.
Review - Continued
• As part of the proposed 1-405 transportation
improvements, Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the
Narco property will re-evaluated and re -master planned.
• Consultant retained January 2006. Inter -departmental
team formed. Public participation process commenced:
• Community Workshop - 2/28/06
• Park Board - 3/14/06
• Committee of the Whole Briefing - 4/10/06
• Open House #1 - 4/18/06
• Park Board - 6/13/06
• Committee of the Whole - 6/19/06
• Current process is anticipating and planning for
recreational trends up to twenty years in the future.
Vision Statement:
Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the
Narco Site to provide compatible park, recreational
and environmental opportunities that complement
a variety of uses which:
• Meets the community's needs
• Promotes environmental stewardship
• Creates a focus of community pride
Planning Principles
• Address Social/Recreation/Utility/Transportation Needs
• Interdepartmental Coordination
• Conform with Regulatory Constraints
• Achieve Sustainability
• Promote Environmental Stewardship
• Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare
These principles will serve as evaluation criteria for master plan
alternatives throughout the planning process.
"W41WR"T1MWRRWW
Renton Staging
•
Project Title springbrook Mitigation bank
1405. 1-5 to SR 169Widening
1-405, Renton to Bellevue
iformerly the Renton Nickell
Project
Project
Funding E15M "m Nickel
$230M from Nickel+TPA
510 (mostly unfunded
Major Features • Constructs 135 acne (5-sibe)
- Adds laane in both
• Adds 2-1anes in both
wetland and habitat
directions to 1405 between
directions to 14135 between
mitigation bank
I-5 and SR 160
SR 169 and I-00
• Constructs Springbrook trail
- Adds 14— SB to SR 107
• Re 6-LKA� 0 interchanges
sough of SW 23rd
between 1405 and SW 41 st
including
St.
SR 169, N, 3rd, SR 900, NE
- Extends SR 167 SG HOV
30th and NE 441h.
north to 14105
• Al SR 159 -the NB flramp
- R—tructs Benson Road
will liein to the current city
improvements project; and
• Removes existing
the SR 15WN 3rd will be
Springbrook Greek box
reconstructed as a split
culrert at 1405
diamond with a flyohrerramp
from SIB I-405 to SB SR 1f7
I-405. SR515 Interchange Tukwila to Renton
Project Im Provement Project
$11 QM from TPA
Currently unfunded
• Adds helfdremond IC at SR
Adds to 1-5 to SR 109
515 (Taltwt Road] with off-
Wdeni ng project
ramp from 3B 1-405 and on -
ramp to NB 1405
- Adds 1 cane in both
drections plw au, lanes to
4405 between SR 187 and
SR 160
-,Adds 14ane NB between
SW 43rd and 1-405
• Reconstructs I-405YSR 167
IG with half -diamond IC al
Lind, frontage mad couplet
between Lind and Talbot,
GP direct com- ramps
between 1405 and SR 107
(south), and HOV di—t
coon. ramps bet —en 1405
(north) and SR 187 (south)
- Reoonst7ucis Renton Hill
Access
• Addresses wells and trtpark
Gas h e d I i nes = PUE nvi ronm a nta I ..... mitigation
Timeline solid lines=Construction
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
..........................■■ (Funded)
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ (Funded)
•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■•.D,*Not Funded - Need RT10)
(Funded)
dh■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■#{Not Funded)
May 17, 3006 is ==wrn�wrr
Upper/Lower Mill
Existing Condition
Proposed Access
Schedule of Completion Dates
-405/I-5 to SR 169 -Nickel/TPA Funding (formerly Renton
Nickel)
-One lane each direction
-Benson Bridge
-SR 167 South Bound
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - January 2007
Est. Construction Completed - October 2009
1-405/SR515 Interchange - Nickel/TPA Funding
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - December 2010
Schedule of Completion Dates - Continued
-405 Renton to Bellevue (SR-169 to I-90) including South
Bound Flyover from I-405 to SR 169
RTID -ROW/Construction (Not funded, potential vote 2007)
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Sept. 2006
Est. Construction Completed - 2016
1-405/1-5 to SR 169 - Implementation Plan including Wells -
Parks -Renton Hill Access
No Funding Source Identified for ROW/Construction
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - 2023
0
pr M
I
ff
w
E� n j
I ,
I ee Q
Liberty, D Slim. �
'�Q O , � park
Park Liberty, Ds
ion us `e ° Jy
¢,Jra a
C ee 7
, pa to Cedar River
-_-4 ert enl. �
�Pa a Faci t � Parh g
kt.aCw ,� e _ ,Aaua,ta�a�,� Park
lthrary $
Expansion
i
qq I enntt er
y I � r ter & P_erking - YJ.'
a ��tliinfie
Jos
g 'eE
>1d,(3) Possible Mitigation Site
V�r de.rl:va � •� � ��
esVoams
a EjP
ElY
Picnic
re1J Shelter
Multl.11) Fdslda • . a Reanr ` \\
Potently Aat ti' Qc (4) %: C.
Pao P itian \�[s esse(4J ExcavafedAre Rrall
Q \ PY 7
as Bike Parks Cn kel (3f r
iJ Climaing waX
N ,� lars n P A �
r-P°� ° fl a'''
Narco Site*'....
❑ -d.w kM•�aa 1 II I
�' ❑' Concept .,,\ LuufU�fLlf /S
Gant Reimbursement Futures -�� Riverview _
Park
Existing
Proposed Reduced
Restrooms ,ll
New I
Pedestrian
Bridge
•
Existing Parking: 240 Spaces
y Proposed Additional Spaces: 210 Spaces
Total Parking: 450 Spaces
Water "`
Department
Facilities Parking
AquaticCenter
Expansion
Co mu its Possible
enter )g _ Mitigation
- Pa ing ,� /f� Site
pans?ion
n Jf
1001,
Carco C!
T
Rest ours heatre S
IExpansi
v-G YY
Bridge
p0' Setback .
Brood Stock
Collection Environmentall
Facility Natural Resource
-4-)` Opportunity
Parking '
..5pa�es
Existing Parking: U Spaces
Proposed Additional Spaces: 358 Spaces
Total Parking: 358 Spaces
" -- Picnic
es.roorrts Sites
5 - - Plsy **err
Parking Area Picnic ref
(344 Spaces) , Shelter r*� '
t • l
r#� • err*r*
f �'r Multi -Use Fields � +�4r��� Cedar ed
Potential ActiJi>— Soccer (4) a Excavated Area
er
Passive Area L rpsse (4) *i _ * Trajl
a TrdJl
Options: /� b9Y ld) r •
Bike Park. : .
Clrmbing lNa i
Picnic Area #
•
`r+ Passive *00"i
as *� Meadow
Conservation Futures
Grant Reimbursement
E� n j
I ,
I ee Q
Liberty, D Slim. �
'�Q O , � park
Park Liberty, Ds
ion us `e ° Jy
¢,Jra a
C ee 7
, pa to Cedar River
-_-4 ert enl. �
�Pa a Faci t � Parh g
kt.aCw ,� e _ ,Aaua,ta�a�,� Park
lthrary $
Expansion
i
qq I enntt er
y I � r ter & P_erking - YJ.'
a ��tliinfie
Jos
g 'eE
>1d,(3) Possible Mitigation Site
V�r de.rl:va � •� � ��
esVoams
a EjP
ElY
Picnic
re1J Shelter
Multl.11) Fdslda • . a Reanr ` \\
Potently Aat ti' Qc (4) %: C.
Pao P itian \�[s esse(4J ExcavafedAre Rrall
Q \ PY 7
as Bike Parks Cn kel (3f r
iJ Climaing waX
N ,� lars n P A �
r-P°� ° fl a'''
Narco Site*'....
❑ -d.w kM•�aa 1 II I
�' ❑' Concept .,,\ LuufU�fLlf /S
Gant Reimbursement Futures -�� Riverview _
Park
Parking Summary
Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Narco Site
TOTALS
Existing
Spaces
143
240
9
383
Proposed
Total Spaces
+Increase/
- Decrease
100 -43
450 +210
358 +358
+525
Note: Numbers do not include the Main Library and Mill Avenue lots.
Implementation Strategies
• Coordination with WSDOT Mitigation
• Build Replacement Facilities Prior to Demolition of Existing
Facilities.
• No Net Loss of Active Recreation
• Coordination with Library Master Plan and other long range
plans in progress
Open House Comment Summary
Liberty Park
• Concept was well -received and particularly the layout of
amenities
• Addition of teen center utilizing the existing community
building was liked
• Maybe want more tennis courts
• A few questions about having a passive meadow as
compared to more active sports in the same location
Open House Comment Summary
Cedar River Park
• Concept was well -received and particularly the layout of
amenities
• Liked the aquatic facility expansion
• Liked the expansion of the community center
• Liked the better visual and physical connection between all
three facilities
• Several verbal concerns about "pass through" vehicular
traffic through the park - the park being used as a short-cut
route
• Liked grouping of fields
• Discussion about visual connectivity from Community Center
to the river
Open House Comment Summary
Narco Site
• The concept was liked
• Really liked the multi -purpose fields
• Really liked the wide range of recreational opportunities
including biking, climbing, organized sports and locations for
individual sports.
• Liked trail and new pedestrian bridges
• Concern about parking close to the trail
• Some concern about the fields being spread out over several
facilities while others really liked the layout and combination
• Need for a trail connection from Renton Hill to Narco.
Field Number Comparison
Design Considerations:
No net loss of fields by field type
Park
Liberty
Cedar River
Narco
Stoneway
(Potential
Mitigation Site
Existing
2 lighted ballfields
1 soccer & 1 ballfield
Full Build Out Concept
4 multi -use fields
(4 soccer, 4 rugby, 4
lacrosse, 3 cricket)
3 lighted ballfields
n' I fr
�} 41,
LIBERTY f
PARK " f
muni
�. % ` C ter E ERc�
f , }
Car t
Thea � EWAY S T �• \�
CEDAR RIVER
ZI
s PARK ROAD -
405 I TRAFFIC CALMING
MEASURES LEGEND
LI SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
winimumwidth)
_.^'• - I--� F--� ti^' RAF FICTlmrN
Ai_LINAY STOP SIGNS l
�
PEDESTRIAN PATH
f:R!]YSW K
:r] pEEINEATIpN PLAWFING
q Cr rx S
TRAFFIC: $ICiHAL
OTHER MEASURES'
ROADNWY AA10HAlEHT ,,la
- SPEED HUMPS
�� � �� � I Q � •- PAVING RFA TEXT
SCHEDULING PARK FACUILRIETES `
_
1u ?
Vdrd
ftlyaK -
New Park Road Bridge Elevation - Looking Downstream
Tri-Park Master Plan, Renton WA
Paer -
0
Next Steps
• Open House #2
• Council Briefing #3
(Draft Plan)
• Open House #3
(Draft Plan Presentation)
• Park Board #3
June 28, 2006
To be determined
To be determined
To be determined
(Final Plan Presentation/Recommendation)
• Council Presentation Anticipated 9/06
(Final Plan Presentation &Adoption)
Tri-Park Open House #2
June 28, 2006
1
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I)AR RI%'i • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MASTED
PLAN
C_n Rl lw
C MtNIT, SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SUMMARY OF OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS
June 28, 2006
A total of twelve residents exclusive of city staff and consultants attended the Open House. The
following attendee comments are recorded here exactly as they were submitted:
LIBERTY PARK:
• Delete the whole park and make a ghetto like planners are creating up the hill in the annexed areas! I am
not on board with Renton planning. Sorry! I am not convinced this will work.
CEDAR RIVER PARK:
• Too much congestion too close to I405. Renton wants to de-emphasize car travel yet you are adding many
parking spaces.
• We like all three plans and hope they work out soon.
• Monitor pass through traffic.
NARCO SITE:
• Nice to have public use in this area.
• We think the plans look wonderful. We are glad that land will be put to good use.
OTHER:
• I liked all three plans
• We think the plans are great. We really like Renton parks -we frequently walk along the river or at Gene
Coulon.
LIBERTY PARKA -
CEDAR RIVER AR
NARCO SIT
TRI-PARKi�
MASTER
CITY OF RENTONAN
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Prepared by: JGM Landscape Architects, Inc:
inom-unc
Review - Cedar River Greenway Master Plan
• Master Plan for area located between existing Liberty
Park east to Renton's City limits at Orcas Ave.
• First Plan developed and adopted in the mid 80's. Plan
reflected existing City -owned properties and
opportunities for future development, expansion &
acquisition.
• Second Plan publicly reviewed, revised and adopted in
1993.
• 57 Acre Narco property identified as part of plan was
acquired in 1993 utilizing several funding sources.
• The Cedar River Trail was identified as part of this plan.
This major trail is part of a much larger trail network.
Review - Continued
• As part of the proposed 1-405 transportation
improvements, Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the
Narco property will re-evaluated and re -master planned.
• Consultant retained January 2006. Inter -departmental
team formed. Public participation process commenced:
• Community Workshop - 2/28/06
• Park Board #1 - 3/14/06
• Committee of the Whole Briefing #1- 4/10/06
• Open House #1 - 4/18/06
• Park Board #2 - 6/13/06
• Committee of the Whole Briefing #2 - 6/19/06
• Open House #2 - 6/28/-06
• Committee of the Whole Briefing #3 - 8/07/06
• Current process is anticipating and planning for
recreational trends up to twenty years in the future.
Vision Statement:
Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the
Narco Site to provide compatible park, recreational
and environmental opportunities that complement
a variety of uses which:
• Meets the community's needs
• Promotes environmental stewardship
• Creates a focus of community pride
Planning Principles
• Address Social/Recreation/Utility/Transportation Needs
• Interdepartmental Coordination
• Conform with Regulatory Constraints
• Achieve Sustainability
• Promote Environmental Stewardship
• Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare
These principles will serve as evaluation criteria for master plan
alternatives throughout the planning process.
"W41WR"T1MWRRWW
Renton Staging
•
Project Title springbrook Mitigation bank
1405. 1-5 to SR 169Widening
1-405, Renton to Bellevue
iformerly the Renton Nickell
Project
Project
Funding E15M "m Nickel
$230M from Nickel+TPA
510 (mostly unfunded
Major Features • Constructs 135 acne (5-sibe)
- Adds laane in both
• Adds 2-1anes in both
wetland and habitat
directions to 1405 between
directions to 14135 between
mitigation bank
I-5 and SR 160
SR 169 and I-00
• Constructs Springbrook trail
- Adds 14— SB to SR 107
• Re 6-LKA� 0 interchanges
sough of SW 23rd
between 1405 and SW 41 st
including
St.
SR 169, N, 3rd, SR 900, NE
- Extends SR 167 SG HOV
30th and NE 441h.
north to 14105
• Al SR 159 -the NB flramp
- R—tructs Benson Road
will liein to the current city
improvements project; and
• Removes existing
the SR 15WN 3rd will be
Springbrook Greek box
reconstructed as a split
culrert at 1405
diamond with a flyohrerramp
from SIB I-405 to SB SR 1f7
I-405. SR515 Interchange Tukwila to Renton
Project Im Provement Project
$11 QM from TPA
Currently unfunded
• Adds helfdremond IC at SR
Adds to 1-5 to SR 109
515 (Taltwt Road] with off-
Wdeni ng project
ramp from 3B 1-405 and on -
ramp to NB 1405
- Adds 1 cane in both
drections plw au, lanes to
4405 between SR 187 and
SR 160
-,Adds 14ane NB between
SW 43rd and 1-405
• Reconstructs I-405YSR 167
IG with half -diamond IC al
Lind, frontage mad couplet
between Lind and Talbot,
GP direct com- ramps
between 1405 and SR 107
(south), and HOV di—t
coon. ramps bet —en 1405
(north) and SR 187 (south)
- Reoonst7ucis Renton Hill
Access
• Addresses wells and trtpark
Gas h e d I i nes = PUE nvi ronm a nta I ..... mitigation
Timeline solid lines=Construction
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
..........................■■ (Funded)
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ (Funded)
•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■•.D,*Not Funded - Need RT10)
(Funded)
dh■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■#{Not Funded)
May 17, 3006 is ==wrn�wrr
Schedule of Completion Dates
-405/I-5 to SR 169 -Nickel/TPA Funding (formerly Renton
Nickel)
-One lane each direction
-Benson Bridge
-SR 167 South Bound
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - January 2007
Est. Construction Completed - October 2009
1-405/SR515 Interchange - Nickel/TPA Funding
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - December 2010
Schedule of Completion Dates - Continued
-405 Renton to Bellevue (SR-169 to I-90) including South
Bound Flyover from I-405 to SR 169
RTID -ROW/Construction (Not funded, potential vote 2007)
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Sept. 2006
Est. Construction Completed - 2016
1-405/1-5 to SR 169 - Implementation Plan including Wells -
Parks -Renton Hill Access
No Funding Source Identified for ROW/Construction
Schedule:
Preliminary Engineering & Environmental - Nov. 2006
Construction Completed - 2023
Public Open House #2; June 28, 2006
NEW
E� n j
I ,
I ee Q
Liberty, D Slim. �
'�Q O , � park
Park Liberty, Ds
ion us `e ° Jy
¢,Jra a
C ee 7
, pa to Cedar River
-_-4 ert enl. �
�Pa a Faci t � Parh g
kt.aCw ,� e _ ,Aaua,ta�a�,� Park
lthrary $
Expansion
i
qq I enntt er
y I � r ter & P_erking - YJ.'
a ��tliinfie
Jos
g 'eE
>1d,(3) Possible Mitigation Site
V�r de.rl:va � •� � ��
esVoams
a EjP
ElY
Picnic
re1J Shelter
Multl.11) Fdslda • . a Reanr ` \\
Potently Aat ti' Qc (4) %: C.
Pao P itian \�[s esse(4J ExcavafedAre Rrall
Q \ PY 7
as Bike Parks Cn kel (3f r
iJ Climaing waX
N ,� lars n P A �
r-P°� ° fl a'''
Narco Site*'....
❑ -d.w kM•�aa 1 II I
�' ❑' Concept .,,\ LuufU�fLlf /S
Gant Reimbursement Futures -�� Riverview _
Park
Parking Summary
Park
Existing Proposed
Spaces Total Spaces
+Increase/
- Decrease
Liberty
Park
143
100
-43
Cedar
River Park
240
450
+210
Narco Site 0 358 +358
TOTALS
383
+525
Note: Numbers do not include the Main Library and Mill Avenue lots.
Field Number Comparison
Design Considerations:
• No net loss of fields by field type
• Need by 2007*: 1 baseball and 4 soccer/football fields
• 2007 shortfall with Full Build Out Concept: 1 ballfield, 1 soccer field
Park
Liberty
Cedar River
Narco
Stoneway
Existing
2 lighted ballfields
1 soccer & 1 ballfield
Full Build Out Concept **
4 multi -use fields
(4 soccer, 4 rugby, 4
lacrosse, 3 cricket)
3 lighted ballfields
*As identified in the 2003 Long -Range Park, Recreation and Open
Space Implementation Plan
Open House Comment Summary
• Full Build -Out Concept was well -received
• Monitor "pass through" traffic in Cedar River Park
Uln.V
ClUARKMIR
El r3l
OU
Narco Site
3—
DRAFT
LIBERTY
CEDAR RIVI,
NARC;
TKITAR-K
MASTER
PLAN
2006
o am am voo goo
rx
-
A6
I.IIWA,y !ll
DRAFT
! V l ! ■ -J 1
M n E
ar R iver
Potential
WSDOT 1-40S
\� Mitigation Site
{' J aJ� N�11hR4 f � sra,nw. wan-:eu.r.r
Tr
Y CEQAR RIM r,
hiarc❑ Site�'..�
Conservatlbn Futures
Grant Reimbursement'
10.27 Acres
Implementation Strategies
• Coordination with WSDOT Mitigation
• Build Replacement Facilities Prior to Demolition of Existing
Facilities.
• No Net Loss of Active Recreation
• Coordination with Library Master Plan and other long range
plans in progress
Preliminary Estimates (2006 Costs):
Park Element
Liberty Park
II Cedar River Park
COR Costs (A)
3,753,000
8,769,300
WSDOT
Mitigation
Estimates (B)
$ 1,420,400 $
$ 801,700 $
CCR L WSDOT
(A & B)
5,173,400
9,571,000
Cedar River Park -
974,700
3,100,000 *
4,074,700
Potential Mitigation Site
(Stoneway)
Narco Site
$
7,265,500
$
5,926,400 $
13,191,900
Narco Site - King County
4,812,500 **
-
4,812,500 **
Conservation Futures
Subtotals
25,575,000 **
$
11,248,500 *
36,823,500 * **
*Does not include WSDOT property acquisition costs for Potential Mitigation Site.
**Does not include City costs for converting property from passive to active use.
Next Steps
• Community Open House #3
August 16, 2006
• Park Board Meeting #3 September 12, 2006
(Final Plan Presentation/Recommendation)
• City Council Presentation September 25, 2006
(Final Plan Presentation and Adoption)
�N�
o
�
Tri-Park Open House #3
August 16, 2006
IW MOW' ��
L 3
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I-R RIi • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MASTED
PLAN
C_n Rl lw
C MtNIT, SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SUMMARY OF OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS
August 16, 2006
A total of twenty seven people, including city staff and consultants, attended the Open House
conducted at the Renton Community Center. The following comments were recorded exactly as
submitted:
• I like the overall plan. The area that I can comment on as a skateboarder is the new, and existing skatepark. For
the existing park, adding lighting would reduce vandals and keep the park useful in the winter. For the new
park 15 years down the road, please have a well known skatepark design/construction (like DreamLand Co) do
the park. These companies are owned by skaters so they know what works. Also please leave money in their
budget for lights! Thanks, Bill.
• Nice! I like that different fields aren't spread out all over. The Narco site will be a great addition and draw to
Renton. I noticed there is going to be an amphitheater -I would love more info about that as I am a member of
Allied Arts of Renton and would like to share it with my group. The scheduled expansions are needed.
Looking forward to seeing the finished parks.
• Have lights installed at the existing skate park for night use. Have a company that are skaters build the new
park, i.e. Grandline, Dreamland etc... We like the skatepark that is existing, but it is not even close to a world
class park. P.S. been skating since 1963 and have seen a lot of skateparks.
• I question the use of the concrete (Stoneway) property for organized sport fields -the "highest and best" use of
this property may be medium -density housing, where residents are close to downtown services (library,
community center, transit center, shops, restaurants, p.o.) and not organized sports fields, where users
predominantly drive to use facility. A dense urban center (future downtown Renton?) doesn't need sports fields
downtown -put these land -intensive users a little more out of the city center. Land Swap? Don't forget the
history -this is what makes Renton a "place", not another generic city strung along 405 (Redmond, Kirkland,
Bellevue, Tukwila). Incorporate the historic infrastructure into the site. Don't over "program" the site. Our
lives (and our kids lives) are too programmed. Maintain "passive" unstructured areas. Overall, good plan —
good to "cluster" organized sports facilities.
• Skatepark ought to have lights. Skatepark should be bigger (20,000 sf min.)
• I'm favorably impressed with the plan but do have some concerns about the future of the library -I hope there is
available space for expansion as needed. Will any of the future ball fields have sufficient grandstand space? I
have attended a number of games at the present facility -really a nice way to spend a summer evening.
• Please augment the drop-off are near the Aquatic Center to provide for the safety of those waiting and driving to
Com. Center. Consider a concession stand for the ball fields and at least two m/f restrooms for fields. Family
friendly.
• I like the idea of a teen center since I have a 14 yo. Unfortunately, it will probably be too late for my son. The
main thing we miss since moving to Renton 4 yrs ago, is the Boys and Girls Club, YMCA, etc organization for
young folks after school, etc. Especially the tweens and teens. Would the Aquatic Center expansion include an
indoor facility to make year round, not just in the summer? My husband loves bicycle trails so would be
excited about those facilities; not necessarily BMX uses but other commuter, general use trails and facilities.
Thank you. Janice.
L16E RTY P.h RIB
('P..I-R RIi • I-.LRK
�•LRL'tl �iil
TIU-PARK
MASTED
PLAN
C-n Rl lw
C MtNIT'SERVICES
TRI-PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SUMMARY OF PARK BOARD COMMENTS
September 12, 2006
The following Park Board member questions, with staff and consultant responses, are recorded
here:
LIBERTY PARK:
• Is there a traffic light proposed at the new Liberty Park entry to the parking area? Yes, the
entrance and exit to the parking area from Bronson Way will have a traffic signal.
CEDAR RIVER PARK:
• Is there any modification proposed to the river bank in front of the Community Center
amphitheater area? The river bank will be modified to allow better public and visual
access to the river. The channel of the river will remain unchanged.
• Will the existing fishing hole formed by the old concrete diversion structure be affected
by any of the proposed park improvements? No modifications are proposed within the
river channel.
• Is additional parking being proposed for the new ballfields located on the Stoneway
property? Yes, an additional 50 parking stalls per field are proposed directly adjacent
to the edge of the balyelds. Additional parking is also proposed north of the
Community Center and at the NARCO site.
• Where are the proposed concession facilities, bleachers and picnic shelters located? New
concessions, bleachers, restrooms and picnic shelters were identified in several
locations around Cedar River Park and also at the NARCO site.
• Is there going to be easy river access for pedestrians under the I-405 bridge structures?
Yes, safe river access for pedestrians is proposed in the Master Plan.
NARCO SITE:
• Will the fields be lighted and what surfacing material is proposed? Yes, the proposed
fields will be lighted and the proposed field surfacing is artificial grass turf.
OTHER:
• What is the anticipated time frame for construction of the park improvements? The
actual time frame depends upon the beginning of several WSDOT construction
projects, funding sources and community needs.
Page 1
• Please provide another auto access/exit to the Tri-park facility if at all possible. If
another access/exist can be found it will be added. Opportunities are limited due to the
locations of existing streets, I-405structures, wells and the Cedar River.
• Is relocating the railroad trestle really necessary if the line is going to be blocked at
Wilburton tunnel project in Bellevue and the Spirit of Washington Dinner Train will be
relocating in the future? Yes, the line also services Boeing and possible other
businesses north of this location.
END OF COMMENT SUMMARY
Page 2
Y
U s,
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
STAFF CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
PURPOSE:
September 20, 2006
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator X6606
Leslie Betlach, Parks Director X6619
Tri-Park Master Plan
(Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, Narco Property)
To inform the City Council regarding the final Open House conducted on August 16, 2006, for
the Tri-Park Master Plan, summarize the master planning process, and forward the September
12, 2006, Board of Park Commissioner's recommendation to Council.
BACKGROUND:
• With the anticipated improvements to the I-405 corridor and the SR 169 interchange, the
City of Renton reviewed impacts to Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco
Property as part of the Tri-Park Master Plan.
• The I-405 Wells and Parks Task Force was formed and work accomplished through July
2005 was documented in a letter of concurrence.
• Outstanding issues were further addressed during a design charrette conducted in July
2005.
• Decisions, along with solutions, were summarized in the Cedar River Vicinity Charrette,
Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access report.
• The Cedar River Vicinity Charrette report was the starting point of a public process to
develop the Tri-Park Master Plan.
• A consultant, JGM, was hired and a City inter -departmental team was formed in January
2006.
• A series of workshops, public meetings, presentations, and briefings were conducted to
solicit input.
• The entire Master Plan process included:
✓ One (1) Community Workshop
✓ Three (3) Community Open Houses
✓ Three (3) Park Board presentations
✓ Four (4) Mayoral briefings,
✓ Tree (3) Council briefings
✓ One (1) Council presentation.
• The third and final Open House was conducted on August 16, 2006, to present concepts
for the three parks.
q:Awork\beth\triparkplan\appendices\28 sep20 memo to council.doc
Status Report for the Tri-Park Master Plan
September 20, 2006
Page 2 of 2
• Approximately 27 people attended the August 16, 2006, Open House located at the
Renton Community Center. City staff and the consultant were present to discuss and
answer questions relating to the presentation boards.
• Attendees were encouraged to complete comment sheets regarding the concepts.
• Comments from the August 16, 2006, Open House were compiled and a summary
prepared (attached).
• Coordination is occurring with the Library Master Plan and other on -going plans.
• Based upon information received as part of the master planning process, a final Draft
Master Plan was prepared. The Consultant presented the Draft Master Plan and
Preliminary Cost Estimates to the Board of Park Commissioners on September 12, 2006.
• The Board of Park Commissioners voted to approve the Plan as presented and forward a
recommendation to Council to adopt.
SUMMARY:
• The first Greenway Master Plan was developed and adopted in the mid-1980's and
included existing park facilities, and also reflected opportunities for future development,
acquisition, and expansion.
• The Plan was reviewed, updated to reflect current needs and future trends and adopted in
1993.
• The Narco property acquisition was completed as identified in this Plan.
• The Cedar River Trail was identified as part of this Plan. This major trail is part of a
much larger trail network.
• Riverview Park and the first phase of Ron Regis Park were completed as part of this Plan.
• The current Master Plan process anticipated and planned for recreational trends up to
twenty years in the future.
• It is possible this Plan will be reviewed and potentially modified within this twenty year
timeframe as trends change, or as transportation needs and/or impacts to Liberty Park,
Cedar River Park, or the Narco property occur.
• Once the Plan is adopted by Council, the Plan will be presented to WSDOT as part of the
continuing work on the I-405 Project.
• Improvements can be completed in phases and are presently not funded by WSDOT.
• The City will have the opportunity to seek alternative funding sources through granting
agencies, such as the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC), to leverage
City funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board of Park Commissioners recommends that Council adopt the Tri-Park Master Plan as
presented.
Attachments:
Open House Comment Summary (8/18/06)
Power Point Presentation
Cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Leslie Betlach, Parks Director
Bill Rasmussen, Project Coordinator
q:\work\beth\triparkplan\appendices\28 sep20 memo to council.doc
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
COMMITTEE REPORT
September 25, 2006
ci
Date e C