HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-04766-065_Wtld-StrmBffrMitgtn_20160322
WETLAND AND STREAM BUFFER
MITIGATION REPORT
BLACK RIVER PUMP STATION
SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Water and Land Resources Division
Note:
Some pages in this document have been purposely skipped or blank pages inserted so that
this document will copy correctly when duplexed.
WETLAND AND STREAM BUFFER
MITIGATION REPORT
Black River Pump Station
Sediment Removal Project
Prepared for
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Water and Land Resources Division
King Street Center – DNRP
201 South Jackson Street, Room 700
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
by
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100
Seattle, Washington 98121
Telephone: 206-441-9080
March 2016
Prepared by:
George Ritchotte, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
For comments or questions contact:
George Ritchotte, 206-787-8288
Alternate Formats Available
206-296-7380 TTY Relay: 711
i
kg 10-04766-065_wtld-strmbffrmitgtn_20160322.docx
CONTENTS
Introduction ................................................................................................. 1
Regulatory Implications ................................................................................... 5
City of Renton Regulations .......................................................................... 5
Mitigation Sequencing ................................................................................ 5
Impacts and Mitigation .................................................................................... 7
Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 7
Impacts ................................................................................................. 7
Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan ............................................. 9
Goals, Objectives, and Performance Standards .......................................... 10
Buffer Revegetation Plan .................................................................... 10
Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan ................................... 12
References ................................................................................................. 15
APPENDICES
Appendix A Photos
Appendix B Planting Plan
TABLES
Table 1. Stream and Wetland Buffer Impact Areas. ................................................. 9
Table 2. Plant Species Planned for Buffer Restoration. ............................................ 11
FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project,
Renton, Washington. .......................................................................... 3
Figure 2. Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project Stream and Wetland
Buffer Impacts. ................................................................................. 8
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 1
I NTRODUCTION
The King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources
Division (County) operates the Black River Pump Station (pump station) to provide flood
control in the lower Green River Valley. The pump station is on the Black River in the City of
Renton, Washington, about 1,700 feet upstream from the confluence of the Black River and
Green River (Figure 1). The County proposes to temporarily divert Black River flow through a
bypass pipe on the north side of the river and dredge approximately 2,900 cubic yards of
sediment that has accumulated behind the pump station. Sediment will be stockpiled and
dewatered on the south side of the Black River before disposal at an offsite facility. Project
construction would entail:
• Staging and site preparation, which will include constructing a sediment stockpiling,
decant and treatment area and crane pad
• Isolating the in-water work area with turbidity curtains, cofferdams, temporary flow
diversion structures, or other best management practices (BMPs)
• Excluding fish from the in-water work area
• Placing sediment removal equipment in the work area using the crane
• Removing and stockpiling sediment adjacent to the river
• Decanting stockpiled sediment and treating the wastewater
• Removing in-water BMPs
• Hauling sediment off site
• Restoring and replanting any cleared areas.
A detailed project description can be found in the Biological Evaluation and Habitat Data
Reports prepared for the project (Herrera 2014a, 2014b).
Despite revisions to project design to reduce environmental impacts, and implementation of
minimization and avoidance measures, the project will result in unavoidable impacts to the
Black River, the regulatory buffer of the Black River, and wetland buffers. The staging and
stockpiling area, and an access road extending from the staging area to the streambank, will
be located within the regulatory buffers of both the Black River and wetlands located on the
south side of the river, resulting in combined stream and wetland buffer impacts on the south
side. The bypass pipe will need to cross the buffers of the Black River and a wetland on the
north side of the river. Minor clearing to set the pipe may cause combined wetland and
stream buffer impacts on the north side. All impacts will be temporary, and cleared areas will
be revegetated with native vegetation once construction is complete.
March 2016
2 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
This report documents City of Renton regulatory requirements, avoidance and minimization
measures that were incorporated into project design and construction methods, unavoidable
buffer impacts, and compensatory mitigation for those impacts.
Seattle
Renton
Renton
Tukwila
SeaTac
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
UV900 UV900
UV167
UV181
UV167
P anther CreekBlackRiver
Springbrook CreekGreenR iv e r
DuwamishRiver
K:\Projects\Y2010\10-04766-018\Project\Mitigation_Report\vicinity_map.mxd (6/12/2015)
0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet
Legend
Project area
Stream or river
Road
Highway
Railroad
City limit
^
P A C I F I CO C E A N
BRITISH COLUMBIA
WASHINGTON
Olympia
Bellingham
MountVernon
DarringtonPortAngeles
EverettForks
Index
SeattleBremerton Leavenworth
Shelton Cle ElumOceanShores
Chehalis
Tacoma
USDA, Aerial (2013)
Figure 1. Vicinity Map for the Black RiverPump Station Sediment Removal Project,Renton, Washington.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 5
R EGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
City of Renton Regulations
Wetlands in the study area are within the Black River shoreline and fall under the jurisdiction
of the City of Renton’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) (RMC 4-3-090). The SMP requires that
wetlands within shoreline jurisdiction be classified according to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology) rating system (Hruby 2004). Buffers are required around
each wetland in order to protect the wetland functions and values. Wetland B is a Category III
wetland with a minimum buffer width of 75 feet. Wetland C is a Category IV wetland, and has
a buffer of 50 feet. Wetland D, also a Category III wetland, has a buffer of 125 feet. Wetland
D has a wider buffer than Wetland B because Wetland D scores higher for habitat functions
(RMC 4-3-090.D.2.d.iv(c)).
According to RMC 4-3-090 B.3.a, the jurisdictional area associated with shorelines include
lands within 200 feet from the OHWM, or lands within 200 feet from floodways, whichever is
greater. Per RMC 4-3-090 D.2, shoreline use and development shall be carried out in a manner
that prevents or mitigates adverse impacts to ensure no net loss of ecological functions and
processes of wetlands, including buffers. According to RMC 4-3-090 D.2.d.x, activities that
adversely affect wetlands or buffers shall follow mitigation sequencing, as described below,
to ensure that impacts on wetlands and buffers are minimized to the extent feasible. In
addition, RMC 4-3-090 F.3.d.viii(c) states that no dredged material shall be stockpiled in a
shoreland area that would result in the clearing of native vegetation.
Mitigation Sequencing
This project has made all reasonable efforts to provide sufficient mitigation such that the
project will not result in net loss of buffer functions. The following describes the mitigation
sequencing approach as required by RMC 4-3-090 D. 21 and the corresponding measures taken
by the project to comply with these requirements:
• Avoiding the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an
action, or moving the action.
o The project completely avoided wetland impacts by moving the proposed staging
area from the north side to the south side of the Black River. Completely avoiding
stream and wetland buffer impacts was not feasible due to the amount of space
needed for the staging and sediment treatment area. Because accumulated
1 This mitigation sequence is also outlined in joint Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers, and
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance (Ecology et al. 2006); and State Environmental
Policy Act (Washington Administrative Code Chapter 197-11-768).
March 2016
6 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
sediments are within the stream channel, completely avoiding stream impacts was
also not possible.
• Minimizing adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology and engineering, or by taking
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce adverse impacts.
o The staging area was sized and located to minimize buffer impacts to the extent
possible. The staging area was sited to avoid the drip line of any large trees.
o Tree clearing has been avoided to the extent possible.
o No native vegetation will be cleared for staging and stockpiling. Staging and
stockpiling will take place on the parking lot and maintained lawn immediately
east of the lot.
o Bypassing and dewatering the excavation area will minimize turbidity.
• Rectifying the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment.
o All areas disturbed by project activities will be revegetated with native plant
species as part of the Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan (see
section below).
• Reducing or eliminating the adverse impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations during the life of the action.
o The project will minimize adverse impacts on buffer areas over time by
revegetating disturbed areas immediately following construction. Lawn that is
currently dominated by nonnative grass will be revegetated with native shrub and
emergent vegetation.
o The Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan (see section below) will
ensure that performance standards for buffer planting areas are achieved and
buffer functions are restored.
• Compensating for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing similar
substitute resources or environments, and monitoring the adverse impact and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
o Cleared areas will be revegetated at a 1:1 ratio. Nonnative vegetation such as
Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), reed canarygrass (Phalaris
arundinacea,) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) will be replaced with
appropriate native species.
Because the project will cause unavoidable temporary buffer impacts, a buffer mitigation and
vegetation management plan is provided in this report.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 7
I MPACTS AND MITIGATION
Existing Conditions
Project activities will occur on the north and south sides of the Black River, as well as within
the Black River channel. On the south side of the river in the project area a narrow strip of
riparian vegetation approximately 60 feet wide extends along the bank, which rises steeply
from the river to a flat grassy area immediately east of the pump station parking lot. Two
wetlands (wetlands B and C) were delineated on the south side of the river for this project
(Herrera 2014c). Wetlands and streams in the project vicinity are described in the Wetland
and Stream Delineation Report (Herrera 2014c).
The proposed access road will extend from the pump station parking lot to the riverbank
through the vegetated strip (Figure 2). Plant species in this location are primarily willows
(Salix spp.), red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), red alder (Alnus rubra), Douglas-fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii), shore pine (Pinus contorta), and black cottonwood (Populus
balsamifera). Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris
arundinacea) dominate the understory (Appendix A, Photo 1).
The staging and dewatering area will be constructed in the grassy area south of the riparian
strip. Vegetation in this area is almost entirely nonnative Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis).
One large (15-inch dbh) shore pine grows in the middle of the lawn (Appendix A, Photo 2).
The north bank rises steeply from the riverbank to a flat area level with the top of the pump
station where the access road and some pump station infrastructure are located. A retaining
wall extends approximately 100 feet along the bank upstream from the pump station. Two
wetlands (wetlands A and D) were delineated on the north side of the river, north and east of
the proposed bypass pipe alignment. Soils consist largely of imported cobbles and gravel fill.
Reed canarygrass, Himalayan blackberry, tansy (Tanacetum vulgare), and other nonnative
herbaceous vegetation are the dominant plant species in this area. There is very little native
vegetation (Appendix A, Photo 3).
Downstream of the pump station the stream bank is heavily riprapped. Himalayan blackberry
has spread over the rocks (Appendix A, Photo 4). On the upstream side of the station a
concrete wingwall extends along the bank for approximately 30 feet. Yellow flag iris grows
thickly along the shoreline (Appendix A, Photos 5 and 6).
Impacts
The total area needed for the south staging and access road is approximately 13,359 square
feet. However, of that total area, 4,727 square feet is gravel parking lot; thus there will be
8,632 square feet of vegetation clearing. Most of the cleared area is within the 200-foot
regulatory buffer of the Black River, and overlaps with portions of the buffers of Wetlands B
and C (Figure 2; Table 1).
K:\Projects\Y2010\10-04766-065\Project\Mitigation_Report\stream_wetland_buffer_impacts.mxd (6/19/2015)
0 60 12030Feet
Legend
Staging area
Wetland and stream buffer impact
Stream buffer impact
Wetland buffer impact
Wetland buffer
Delineated wetland
Bing, Aerial (2014)
Figure 2. Black River Pump Station SedimentRemoval Project Stream and WetlandBuffer Impacts.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 9
Table 1. Stream and Wetland Buffer Impact Areas.
Impact Type Impact Area (sq. ft.)
Access Road
Combined wetland C and stream buffer 528
South Staging Area
Stream buffer only 1,171
Wetland B and stream buffer 3,691
Wetland B buffer only 2,856
Combined wetland B, C, and stream buffer 386
Bypass Pipe Alignment
Stream buffer only 3,738
Combined wetland D and stream buffer 10,019
The south side staging and stockpiling area covers 8,104 square feet, and covers buffers of
the Black River, Wetland B, and Wetland C. Vegetation is almost entirely maintained lawn
dominated by nonnative Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). One 15-inch dbh shore pine in
the middle of the lawn will need to be removed. Except for removal of that tree, no native
vegetation will be cleared for stockpiling.
The access road area is approximately 528 square feet. Several small (2- to 4-inch dbh) red
alders and two small (2-inch dbh) Douglas-firs will be removed to construct the road
(Appendix A, Photos 7 and 8).
As much as 13,757 square feet of stream and Wetland D buffer vegetation will be cleared
within the bypass pipe alignment (Table 2). Almost all the vegetation within this area consists
of nonnative weedy species (Appendix A, Photos 9 and 10). No trees, shrubs, or native woody
vegetation will be removed.
All buffer impacts will be temporary and will be restored post project per the buffer
mitigation plan described below.
Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan
According to RMC 4-3-090 D. 2. d. xii, a vegetation management plan is required in order to
maintain effective buffer conditions and function. Supplemental planting may be necessary to
provide adequate cover of native vegetation. In addition, the plan needs to include measures
for controlling invasive weeds and removal of existing invasive species. The plan also needs to
include a monitoring and maintenance plan for a period of at least 5 years. This plan will
ensure that buffer areas are restored to their pre-existing condition or better (such as
reduction of invasive species coverage), resulting in no net loss of ecological functions in
buffer areas. Per RMC, 4-3-090 D. 2. d. x (e), the minimum mitigation ratio for buffer impacts
is 1:1 (i.e., the area of buffer revegetation must equal the area of buffer impact). The
project will enhance existing buffer by replacing the existing maintained lawn with native
buffer vegetation.
March 2016
10 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Goals, Objectives, and Performance Standards
The goal of the mitigation plan is to rectify temporary buffer impacts by restoring buffer
function through restoration of buffer vegetation, resulting in no net loss of buffer area or
ecological function. The objective is to establish a diversity of native emergent and shrub
species in buffer restoration areas that will develop into a mature vegetation community with
adequate cover and comprised of native plant species. The project will accomplish these
goals and objectives by implementing the following performance standards:
• Year 1: 100 percent of planted species will survive by the end of the first year after
planting. Plants that die will be replaced. All plants will be installed as specified in
the mitigation plan to achieve intended plant community composition and structural
diversity.
• Year 2: By the end of the second year growing season, native vegetation cover will be
at least 20 percent.
• Year 3: By the end of the third year growing season, native vegetation cover will be at
least 40 percent.
• Year 4: By the end of the fourth year growing season, native vegetation cover will be
at least 60 percent.
• Year5: By the end of the fifth year growing season, native vegetation cover will be at
least 80 percent.
• All years: The percentage of the buffer mitigation areas covered by invasive and
nonnative species will not exceed 15 percent throughout the monitoring period.
Buffer Revegetation Plan
The general construction sequence for construction activities in buffer mitigation areas is as
follows:
• Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures per plans and
specifications
• Site clearing and grubbing per plans and specifications (selective removal of invasive
plant species and retention of native species where possible)
• Site excavation per plans and specifications, including decompacting soils compacted
by the decant facility and access road
• Replacement of topsoil
• Installation of weed-free wood chip mulch in the planting areas
• Installation of native plant material per project plans and specifications
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 11
Planting is scheduled to occur during the dormant, or non-growing, season. Trees will be
planted 10 feet on center, shrubs will be planted 4 feet on center, and herbaceous species
will be planted 18 inches on center. Plants will be, at minimum, in 1-gallon containers.
Plant material will be inspected by the project biologist, botanist, or horticulturist before
acceptance, and that person will be on site during replacement of topsoil and plant
installation to ensure that topsoil and plants are installed properly.
A variety of native species will be planted in the buffers (Table 2). Species adapted to wetter
conditions will be planted in the access road area adjacent to the river. Species more tolerant
of drier, sunnier conditions will be planted in the staging area. Many of these plant species
currently occur on site, providing a reference for planting prescriptions. The selected species
are common in western Washington riparian forest habitat, provide good forage and cover
resources for fish and wildlife, and perform well in restoration sites (Stevens and Vanbianchi
1993). Plants with narrow ecological tolerance ranges or that are difficult to obtain from local
native plant nurseries were not selected. The mitigation planting plan is included in
Appendix B.
Table 2. Plant Species Planned for Buffer Restoration.
Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Wetland Indicator Status
Access Road and Bypass Pipe Alignment East of Retaining Wall
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera Tree FAC
Big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Tree FACU
Pacific willow Salix lucida Shrub FACW
Red osier dogwood Cornus sericea Shrub FACW
Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus Shrub FACW
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Shrub FAC
Sword fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous FACU
Fringecup Tellima grandiflora Herbaceous FAC
Piggyback plant Tolmiea menziesii Herbaceous FACU
Woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca Herbaceous FACU
South Staging Area
Beaked hazelnut Corylus cornuta Shrub FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Shrub FAC
Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus Shrub FACU
Oceanspray Holodiscus discolor Shrub FACU
Tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium Shrub FACU
Sword fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous FACU
Blue wild rye Elymus glaucus Herbaceous FACU
Columbia brome Bromus vulgaris Herbaceous FACU
Bypass Pipe Alignment
Blue wild rye Elymus glaucus Herbaceous FACU
Columbia brome Bromus vulgaris Herbaceous FACU
March 2016
12 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
There will be no grubbing on the north side of the river, but there may be some minor
clearing to lay the bypass pipe. No trees, shrubs, or woody vegetation will be cleared. Native
trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species will be planted within any cleared areas in the stream
buffer east of the pump station retaining wall. Other cleared areas north of the river will be
hydroseeded with a mix of native grasses. No trees or shrubs will be planted west of the
retaining wall because this area provides access to pump station infrastructure.
Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan
Per RMC 4-3-090 D.2.d.xii, maintenance and monitoring will be conducted to ensure that
buffer mitigation goals, objectives, and performance standards are achieved. The
maintenance and monitoring program will be conducted for a minimum of 5 years to ensure
plants become established and develop adequate native vegetation cover. If monitoring
activities determine that performance standards are not being met, contingency measures
will be implemented to remedy onsite problems.
Monitoring Plan
The County will arrange for a qualified biologist to perform monitoring of the buffer
enhancement areas to ensure compliance with the performance standards listed above. The
site will be monitored annually for 5 years following construction. If monitoring results
determine performance standards are not being achieved, corrective actions will be taken
(see Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan below).
Year 1 Monitoring
The monitoring visit at the end of the first growing season following construction will be
conducted to establish permanent sampling plots and photograph points (as needed), inspect
the plantings, identify mortality, and specify quantities and locations of plants needing
replacement (see Year 1 Performance Standard above). In addition, the site will be inspected
for the presence of invasive or exotic plant species (see All Years Performance Standard
above).
Years 2, 3, 4, and 5 Monitoring
During the second, third, fourth, and fifth years of monitoring, mitigation areas will be
evaluated and photographs will be taken from each of the permanent photograph points. At
the end of the fifth year growing), if performance standards are not achieved, the monitoring
period shall be extended for as many years as necessary until they are achieved.
All Years
Every year mitigation areas will be monitored for invasive species cover to ensure percentage
of the buffer mitigation areas covered by invasive and nonnative species does not exceed
15 percent.
Site Maintenance and Contingency Plan
Following initial planting, the planting contractor will be responsible for maintaining
100 percent plant survival within the wetland and buffer enhancement areas for a minimum
of 1 year as per the planting contract plans. In accordance with the 1-year plant survival
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 13
guarantee, the contractor will replace plants that have died during the first year. Before
plants are replaced, the contractor will consult with the project biologist arranged by the
County to determine why certain species are not surviving and, if necessary, which native
plant substitutions are appropriate. In addition, throughout the summer of the first year, the
contractor will be responsible for irrigating as frequently as necessary to ensure healthy plant
conditions.
The County will be responsible for managing the establishment of plants from the second
through the fifth year, with the goal of meeting all applicable performance standards listed
above. If percent cover requirements are not met, maintenance activities may include, but
are not limited to, plant replacement, plant supplement, plant substitution, adjustment of
planting layout to reflect specific or changing site conditions, weed control, and installation
and adjustment of plant protection devices.
An integrated pest management (IPM) approach will be adhered to for invasive species
management within buffer mitigation areas (All Years Performance Standard), including
limited use of herbicides per RMC 4-3-090 D. 2. d. xi. Invasive plant species will by hand
pulled to the extent practical. If herbicides are deemed appropriate for use to control
invasive species, only those herbicides approved for use in aquatic ecosystems by Ecology
(e.g., Rodeo, Aquamaster) will be selected. Herbicides will be applied by a licensed
applicator.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 15
R EFERENCES
Herrera. 2014a. Biological Evaluation for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal
Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County Department of
Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. February 5, 2015. 28 pp.
Herrera. 2014b. Habitat Data Report for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal
Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County Department of
Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. March 2, 2015. 44 pp.
Herrera. 2014c. Wetland and Stream Delineation Report. Black River Pump Station Sediment
Removal Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County
Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. May 16, 2014.
130 pp.
Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington — Revised.
Ecology Publication 04-06-025. Washington State Department of Ecology. August 2004.
Stevens, M.L. and R. Vanbianchi. 1993. Restoring Wetlands In Washington: a Guidebook for
Wetland Restoration Planning and Implementation. Washington State Department of Ecology,
Olympia, Washington. Available at:
<https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/93017.html>.
Washington State Department of Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and
US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. March 2006. Wetland Mitigation in Washington
State – Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1). Washington State Department of
Ecology Publication #06-06-011a. Olympia, Washington.
APPENDIX A
Photos
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-1
Photo 1. Riparian vegetation on the south bank of the Black River.
Photo 2. Top of bank along the north edge of lawn where staging and
stockpiling will take place. The shore pine is in the background.
March 2016
A-2 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Photo 3. Road on north side of Black River and typical Wetland D
buffer vegetation in foreground.
Photo 4. Nonnative vegetation on the north bank of the Black River
downstream from the pump station.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-3
Photo 5. Wingwall and stream bank on the north side of the Black River
upstream of the pump station.
Photo 6. Yellow flag iris on the north bank of the Black River upstream
of the pump station.
March 2016
A-4 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Photos 7 and 8. Buffer vegetation in the proposed south side access road alignment.
March 2016
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-5
Photo 9. Buffer vegetation in the proposed bypass pipe alignment – east
of Black River Pump Station.
Photo 10. Buffer vegetation in the proposed bypass pipe alignment –
west of Black River Pump Station.
March 2016
A-6 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
APPENDIX B
Planting Plan
Figure 1Black River Pump StationSediment Removal ProjectBuffer Revegetation PlanO:\proj\Y2010\10-04766-065\CAD\Dwg\Mitigation Report\Figure 1 - Planting Areas.dwgScale in Feet0 25 50100LEGENDSEEDING AREABYPASS PIPE ALIGNMENTPLANTING AREASOUTH STAGING AREAACCESS ROAD AREA
Figure 2Black River Pump StationSediment Removal ProjectPlanting Schedule and DetailsO:\proj\Y2010\10-04766-065\CAD\Dwg\Mitigation Report\Figure 2 - Planting Schedule and Details.dwgSTRATUMSCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMEWETLANDINDICATORSTATUSPLANTMATERIAL SIZEON CENTER(O.C.) SPACINGTOTAL PLANTQUANTITIESPLANT ZONE QUANTITIESACCESS ROADAREASOUTH STAGINGAREATREEACER MACROPHYLLUMBIGLEAF MAPLEFACU1 GALLON10' O.C.33TREEPOPULUS BALSAMIFERABLACK COTTONWOODFAC1 GALLON10' O.C.33SHRUBAMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIASERVICEBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBCORNUS SERICEARED OSIER DOGWOODFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBCORYLUS CORNUTABEAKED HAZELNUTFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBMAHONIA AQUIFOLIUMTALL OREGON GRAPEFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBPHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUSPACIFIC NINEBARKFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBROSA NUTKANANOOTKA ROSEFAC1 GALLON4' O.C.91982SHRUBRUBUS PARVIFLORUSTHIMBLEBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBSALIX SITCHENSISSITKA WILLOWFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBSAMBUCUS RACEMOSARED ELDERBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBSYMPHORICARPOS ALBUSSNOWBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282GROUNDCOVERFRAGERIA VESCAWOODLAND STRAWBERRYFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.5555GROUNDCOVERPOLYSTICHUM MUNITUMSWORD FERNFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.1789551734GROUNDCOVERTELLIMA GRANDIFLORAFRINGECUPFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.5555GROUNDCOVERTOLMIEA MENZIESIIPIGGYBACK PLANTFAC1 GALLON2' O.C.5555PLANT SCHEDULEEXCAVATE SOIL FOR PLANTING TO DIMENSIONSSHOWN. FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL AND WATERSETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POCKETS. DO NOTDAMAGE ROOTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS24" DIAMETER BARK OR WOODCHIP MULCH RING, KEEP 2"AWAY FROM TRUNK OF PLANTFINISH GRADEREMOVE CONTAINER PRIOR TOPLANTING. DURING PLANTINGOPERATIONS GENTLY LOOSENAND SPREAD ROOTSCOMPRESS SOIL INTO SMALL, FLAT TOPPEDMOUND BENEATH ROOTBALL FOR SUPPORT 6" GREATERTHANROOTBALL ORCONTAINERDEPTHPLANT AT SAMELEVEL AS GROWNIN POTEXCAVATE SOIL FOR PLANTING TO DIMENSIONSSHOWN. FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL AND WATERSETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POCKETS. DO NOTDAMAGE ROOTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS24" DIAMETER BARK OR WOOD CHIPMULCH RING, 4" THICK LAYER, KEEP 2"AWAY FROM TRUNK OF PLANTFINISH GRADEREMOVE CONTAINER PRIOR TO PLANTING.DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS GENTLY LOOSENAND SPREAD ROOTS AT BOTTOM OF ROOTBALLCOMPRESS SOIL INTO SMALL, FLAT TOPPEDMOUND BENEATH ROOTBALL FOR SUPPORTPLANT AT SAMELEVEL AS GROWNIN POTEXISTING GROUNDMAX.ONE GALLON CONTAINER PLANTING DETAILONE GALLON CONTAINERPLANTING ON SLOPE DETAIL 6" GREATERTHANROOTBALL ORCONTAINERDEPTHSTRATUMSCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMEWETLANDINDICATORSTATUSPERCENT OF MIXBY SEED COUNTPERCENT OF MIXBY SEED WEIGHTPOUNDS PURELIVE SEED (PLS)PER ACREHERBACEOUSBROMUS CARINATUSCALIFORNIA BROMENOT LISTED3021.1815.68HERBACEOUSELYMUS GLAUCUSBLUE WILDRYEFACU3015.7511.66HERBACEOUSFESTUCA RUBRARED FESCUEFAC304.243.14HERBACEOUSTRITICUM AESTIVUMREGREEN STERILE WHEATGRASSNOT LISTED1058.8443.56BYPASS PIPE AREA AND SOUTH STAGING AREA SEED MIXNOTES:1. REMOVE ANY NOXIOUS AND/OR NONNATIVE WEEDS FROM PLANTING ZONES PRIOR TOPLANTING.2. THE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE GRADES PRIOR TO MULCHAPPLICATION AND PLANT INSTALLATION.3. PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PROJECTREPRESENTATIVE.4. PLANTS SHALL BE TAGGED FOR IDENTIFICATION AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECTREPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5. KEEP PLANTS SHADED UNTIL TIME OF PLANTING. DO NOT LET PLANT MATERIAL SIT INSUN OR DRY OUT BEFORE PLANTING.6. PLANT GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUBS IN CLUSTERS OF THREE, FIVE, AND SEVEN. EACHCLUSTER SHALL BE ONE SPECIES. EVENLY SPACE CLUSTERS THROUGHOUT PLANTZONES. INTENT OF PLANTING IS TO APPEAR NATURAL AND INFORMAL.7. THE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE PLANT LAYOUT BEFOREINSTALLATION.8. APPLY SEED MIX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH OCTOBER 1 AND/OR BETWEENMARCH 1 AND MAY 15.9. INSTALL SHRUBS, AND GROUNDCOVER BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND MARCH 1 OF THEFIRST DORMANT SEASON FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION.