HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppx B 10-04766-065_Wtld-Strm Bffr Mitgtn 150623
DRAFT
WETLAND AND STREAM BUFFER
MITIGATION REPORT
BLACK RIVER PUMP STATION
SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Water and Land Resources Division
WETLAND AND STREAM BUFFER
MITIGATION REPORT
Black River Pump Station
Sediment Removal Project
Prepared for
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Water and Land Resources Division
King Street Center – DNRP
201 South Jackson Street, Room 700
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
by
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100
Seattle, Washington 98121
Telephone: 206-441-9080
June 23, 2015 DRAFT
Prepared by:
George Ritchotte, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
For comments or questions contact:
George Ritchotte, 206-787-8288
Alternate Formats Available
206-296-7380 TTY Relay: 711
i
kg 10-04766-065_wtld-strm bffr mitgtn 150623.docx
CONTENTS
Introduction ................................................................................................. 1
Regulatory Implications ................................................................................... 3
City of Renton Regulations .......................................................................... 3
Mitigation Sequencing ................................................................................ 3
Impacts and Mitigation .................................................................................... 5
Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 5
Impacts ................................................................................................. 5
Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan ............................................. 7
Goals, Objectives, and Performance Standards ........................................... 8
Buffer Revegetation Plan ..................................................................... 8
Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan ................................... 10
References ................................................................................................. 13
APPENDICES
Appendix A Photos
Appendix B Planting Plan
TABLES
Table 1. Stream and Wetland Buffer Impact Areas. ................................................. 7
Table 2. Plant Species Planned for Buffer Restoration. ............................................. 9
FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project,
Renton, Washington. .......................................................................... 2
Figure 2. Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project Stream and Wetland
Buffer Impacts. ................................................................................. 6
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 1
I NTRODUCTION
The King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources
Division (King County) operates the Black River Pump Station (pump station) to provide flood
control in the lower Green River Valley. The pump station is located on the Black River in the
City of Renton, Washington, about 1,700 feet upstream from the confluence of the Black
River and Green River (Figure 1). King County proposes to temporarily divert Black River flow
through a bypass pipe on the north side of the river and dredge approximately 2,900 cubic
yards of sediment that has accumulated behind the pump station. Sediment will be stockpiled
and dewatered on the south side of the Black River before disposal at an offsite facility.
Project construction would entail:
• Staging and site preparation, which will include constructing a sediment stockpiling,
decant and treatment area and crane pad
• Isolating the in-water work area with turbidity curtains, cofferdams, temporary flow
diversion structures, or other best management practices (BMPs)
• Excluding fish from the in-water work area
• Placing sediment removal equipment in the work area using the crane
• Removing and stockpiling sediment adjacent to the river
• Decanting stockpiled sediment and treating the wastewater
• Removing in-water BMPs
• Hauling sediment off site
• Restoring and replanting any cleared areas
A detailed project description can be found in the Biological Evaluation and Habitat Data
Reports prepared for the project (Herrera 2014a, 2014b).
Despite revisions to project design to reduce environmental impacts, and implementation of
minimization and avoidance measures, the project will result in unavoidable impacts to the
Black River, the regulatory buffer of the Black River, and wetland buffers. The staging and
stockpiling area, and an access road extending from the staging area to the streambank, will
be located within the regulatory buffers of both the Black River and wetlands located on the
south side of the river, resulting in combined stream and wetland buffer impacts on the south
side. The bypass pipe will need to cross the buffers of the Black River and a wetland on the
north side of the river. Minor clearing to set the pipe may cause combined wetland and
stream buffer impacts on the north side. All impacts will be temporary, and cleared areas will
be revegetated with native vegetation once construction is complete.
This report documents City of Renton regulatory requirements, avoidance and minimization
measures that were incorporated into project design and construction methods, unavoidable
buffer impacts, and compensatory mitigation for those impacts.
Seattle
Renton
Renton
Tukwila
SeaTac
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
UV900 UV900
UV167
UV181
UV167
P anther CreekBlackRiver
Springbrook CreekGreenR iv e r
DuwamishRiver
K:\Projects\Y2010\10-04766-018\Project\Mitigation_Report\vicinity_map.mxd (6/12/2015)
0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet
Legend
Project area
Stream or river
Road
Highway
Railroad
City limit
^
P A C I F I CO C E A N
BRITISH COLUMBIA
WASHINGTON
Olympia
Bellingham
MountVernon
DarringtonPortAngeles
EverettForks
Index
SeattleBremerton Leavenworth
Shelton Cle ElumOceanShores
Chehalis
Tacoma
USDA, Aerial (2013)
Figure 1. Vicinity Map for the Black RiverPump Station Sediment Removal Project,Renton, Washington.
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 3
R EGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
City of Renton Regulations
Wetlands in the study area are within the Black River shoreline and fall under the jurisdiction
of the City of Renton’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) (Redmond Municipal Code
[RMC] 4-3-090). The SMP requires that wetlands within shoreline jurisdiction be classified
according to the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) rating system (Hruby
2004). Buffers are required around each wetland in order to protect the wetland functions
and values. Wetland B is a Category III wetland with a minimum buffer width of 75 feet.
Wetland C is a Category IV wetland, and has a buffer of 50 feet. Wetland D, also a Category III
wetland, has a buffer of 125 feet.
According to RMC 4-3-090 B.3.a, the jurisdictional area associated with shorelines include
lands within 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark or lands within 200 feet from
floodways, whichever is greater. Per RMC 4-3-090 D.2, shoreline use and development shall be
carried out in a manner that prevents or mitigates adverse impacts to ensure no net loss of
ecological functions and processes of wetlands, including buffers. According to RMC 4-3-090
D.2.d.x, activities that adversely affect wetlands or buffers shall follow mitigation
sequencing, as described below, to ensure that impacts on wetlands and buffers are
minimized to the extent feasible. In addition, RMC 4-3-090 F.3.d.viii(c) states that no dredged
material shall be stockpiled in a shoreland area that would result in the clearing of native
vegetation.
Mitigation Sequencing
This project has made all reasonable efforts to provide sufficient mitigation such that the
project will not result in net loss of buffer functions. The following describes the mitigation
sequencing approach as required by RMC 4-3-090 D. 21 and the corresponding measures taken
by the project to comply with these requirements:
• Avoiding the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an
action, or moving the action.
o The project completely avoided wetland impacts by moving the proposed staging
area from the north side to the south side of the Black River. Completely avoiding
stream and wetland buffer impacts was not feasible due to the amount of space
eneded for the staging and sediment treatment area. Because accumulated
sediments are within the stream channel, completely avoiding stream impacts was
also unavoidable.
1 This mitigation sequence is also outlined in joint Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers, and
US Environmental Protection Agency guidance (Ecology et al. 2006); and State Environmental Policy Act
(Washington Administrative Code Chapter 197-11-768).
June 2015
4 DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
• Minimizing adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology and engineering, or by taking
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce adverse impacts.
o The staging area was sized and located to minimize buffer impacts to the extent
possible. The staging area was sited to avoid the drip line of any large trees.
o Tree clearing has been avoided to the extent possible.
o No native vegetation will be cleared for staging and stockpiling. Staging and
stockpiling will take place on the parking lot and maintained lawn immediately
east of the lot.
o Bypassing and dewatering the excavation area will minimize turbidity.
• Rectifying the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment.
o All areas disturbed by project activities will be revegetated with native plant
species as part of the Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan (see
section below).
• Reducing or eliminating the adverse impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations during the life of the action.
o The project will minimize adverse impacts on buffer areas over time by
revegetating disturbed areas immediately following construction. Lawn that is
currently dominated by nonnative grass will be revegetated with native shrub and
emergent vegetation.
o The Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan (see section below) will
ensure that performance standards for buffer planting areas are achieved and
buffer functions are restored.
• Compensating for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing similar
substitute resources or environments, and monitoring the adverse impact and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
o Cleared areas will be revegetated at a 1:1 ratio. Nonnative vegetation such as
Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), reed canarygrass (Phalaris
arundinacea,) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) will be replaced with
appropriate native species.
Because the project will cause unavoidable temporary buffer impacts, a buffer mitigation and
vegetation management plan is provided in this report.
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 5
I MPACTS AND MITIGATION
Existing Conditions
Project activities will occur on the north and south sides of the Black River, as well as within
the Black River channel. On the south side of the river in the project area a narrow strip of
riparian vegetation approximately 60 feet wide extends along the bank, which rises steeply
from the river to a flat grassy area immediately east of the pump station parking lot. Two
wetlands (wetlands B and C) were delineated on the south side of the river for this project
(Herrera 2014c). Wetlands and streams in the project vicinity are described in the Wetland
and Stream Delineation Report (Herrera 2014c).
The proposed access road will extend from the pump station parking lot to the riverbank
through the vegetated strip (Figure 2). Plant species in this location are primarily willows
(Salix spp.), red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), red alder (Alnus rubra), Douglas-fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii), shore pine (Pinus contorta), and black cottonwood (Populus
balsamifera). Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris
arundinacea) dominate the understory (Appendix A, Photo 1).
The staging and dewatering area will be constructed in the grassy area south of the riparian
strip. Vegetation in this area is almost entirely nonnative Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis).
One large shore pine, which is 15 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) grows in the middle
of the lawn (Appendix A, Photo 2).
The north bank rises steeply from the riverbank to a flat area level with the top of the pump
station where the access road and some pump station infrastructure are located. Two
wetlands (wetlands A and D) were delineated on the north side of the river, north and east of
the proposed bypass pipe alignment. Soils consist largely of imported cobbles and gravel fill.
Reed canarygrass, Himalayan blackberry, tansy (Tanacetum vulgare), and other nonnative
herbaceous vegetation are the dominant plant species in this area. There is very little native
vegetation (Appendix A, Photo 3).
Downstream of the pump station the stream bank is heavily riprapped. Himalayan blackberry
has spread over the rocks (Appendix A, Photo 4). On the upstream side of the station a
concrete wingwall extends along the bank for approximately 30 feet. Yellow flag iris grows
thickly along the shoreline (Appendix A, Photos 5 and 6).
Impacts
The total area needed for the south staging and access road is approximately 13,359 square
feet. However, of that total area, 4,593 square feet of that area is gravel parking lot; thus
there will be 8,766 square feet of vegetation clearing. Most of the cleared area is within the
200-foot regulatory buffer of the Black River, and overlaps with portions of the buffers of
Wetlands B and C (Figure 2; Table 1).
K:\Projects\Y2010\10-04766-065\Project\Mitigation_Report\stream_wetland_buffer_impacts.mxd (6/19/2015)
0 60 12030Feet
Legend
Staging area
Wetland and stream buffer impact
Stream buffer impact
Wetland buffer impact
Wetland buffer
Delineated wetland
Bing, Aerial (2014)
Figure 2. Black River Pump Station SedimentRemoval Project Stream and WetlandBuffer Impacts.
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 7
Table 1. Stream and Wetland Buffer Impact Areas.
Impact Type Impact Area (sq. ft.)
Access Road
Wetland C and stream buffer 528
South Staging Area
Stream buffer only 1,171
Wetland B and stream buffer 3,825
Wetland B buffer only 2,856
Combined wetland B, C, and stream buffer 386
Bypass Pipe Alignment
Stream buffer only 3,738
Wetland D and stream buffer 10,019
The south side staging and stockpiling area covers 8,104 square feet, and covers buffers of
the Black River, Wetland B, and Wetland C. Vegetation is almost entirely maintained lawn
dominated by nonnative Kentucky bluegrass. One 15-inch dbh shore pine in the middle of the
lawn will need to be removed. Except for removal of that tree, no native vegetation will be
cleared for stockpiling.
The access road area is approximately 528 square feet. Several small (2- to 4-inch dbh) red
alders and two small (2-inch dbh) Douglas-firs will be removed to construct the road
(Appendix A, Photos 7 and 8). As much as 13,757 square feet of stream and Wetland D buffer
vegetation will be cleared within the bypass pipe alignment (Table 2). Almost all the
vegetation within this area consists of nonnative weedy species (Appendix A, Photos 9 and
10). No trees, shrubs, or native woody vegetation will be removed.
All buffer impacts will be temporary and will be restored post project per the buffer
mitigation plan described below.
Buffer Mitigation and Vegetation Management Plan
According to RMC 4-3-090 D.2.d.xii, a vegetation management plan is required in order to
maintain effective buffer conditions and function. Supplemental planting may be necessary to
provide adequate cover of native vegetation. In addition, the plan needs to include measures
for controlling invasive weeds and removal of existing invasive species. The plan also needs to
include a monitoring and maintenance plan for a period of at least 5 years. This plan will
ensure that buffer areas are restored to their pre-existing condition or better (such as
reduction of invasive species coverage), resulting in no net loss of ecological functions in
buffer areas. Per RMC, 4-3-090 D.2.d.x(e), the minimum mitigation ratio for buffer impacts is
1:1 (i.e., the area of buffer revegetation must equal the area of buffer impact). The project
will enhance existing buffer by replacing the existing maintained lawn with native buffer
vegetation.
June 2015
8 DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Goals, Objectives, and Performance Standards
The goal of the mitigation plan is to rectify temporary buffer impacts by restoring buffer
function through restoration of buffer vegetation, resulting in no net loss of buffer area or
ecological function. The objective is to establish a diversity of native emergent and shrub
species in buffer restoration areas that will develop into a mature vegetation community with
adequate cover and comprised of native plant species.
The project will accomplish the goal and objective of the mitigation plan by implementing
the following performance standards.
• Year 0: 100 percent of planted species will survive by the end of the first year after
planting. Plants that die will be replaced. All plants will be installed as specified in
the mitigation plan to achieve intended plant community composition and structural
diversity.
• Year 1: By the end of the second year growing season, native vegetation cover will be
at least 20 percent.
• Year 2: By the end of the third year growing season, native vegetation cover will be at
least 40 percent.
• Year 3: By the end of the fourth year growing season, native vegetation cover will be
at least 60 percent.
• Year 4: By the end of the fifth year growing season, native vegetation cover will be at
least 80 percent.
• All years: The percentage of the buffer mitigation areas covered by invasive and
nonnative species will not exceed 15 percent throughout the monitoring period.
Buffer Revegetation Plan
The general construction sequence for construction activities in buffer mitigation areas is as
follows:
• Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures per plans and
specifications
• Site clearing and grubbing per plans and specifications (selective removal of invasive
plant species and retention of native species where possible)
• Site excavation per plans and specifications
• Replacement of topsoil
• Installation of weed-free wood chip mulch in the planting areas
• Installation of native plant material per project plans and specifications
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 9
Planting is scheduled to occur during the dormant, or non-growing, season (October 2015).
Because stream access may be needed for future dredging projects, only shrubs and
herbaceous species are proposed for planting, to minimize removal of woody vegetation in
the future. Shrubs will be planted 4 feet on center, and herbaceous species will be planted
18 inches on center. Plants will be, at minimum, in 1-gallon containers.
Plant material will be inspected by the project biologist, botanist, or horticulturist before
acceptance, and that person will be on site during replacement of topsoil and plant
installation to ensure that topsoil and plants are installed properly.
A variety of native emergent and shrub species will be planted in the buffers (Table 2).
Species adapted to wetter conditions will be planted in the access road area adjacent to the
river. Species more tolerant of drier, sunnier conditions will be planted in the staging area.
Many of these plant species currently occur on site, providing a reference for planting
prescriptions. The selected species are common in western Washington riparian forest
habitat, provide good forage and cover resources for fish and wildlife, and perform well in
restoration sites (Stevens and Vanbianchi 1993). Plants with narrow ecological tolerance
ranges or that are difficult to obtain from local native plant nurseries were not selected. The
mitigation planting plan is included in Appendix B.
Table 2. Plant Species Planned for Buffer Restoration.
Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Wetland Indicator Status
Access Road
Red osier dogwood Cornus sericea Shrub FACW
Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus Shrub FACW
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Shrub FAC
Sitka willow Salix sitchensis Shrub FACW
Woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca Herbaceous FACU
Sword fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous FACU
Fringecup Tellima grandiflora Herbaceous FAC
Piggyback plant Tolmiea menziesii Herbaceous FACU
South Staging Area
Serviceberry Amelianchier alnifolia FACU
Beaked hazelnut Corylus cornuta Shrub FACU
Tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium Shrub FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Shrub FAC
Thimbleberry Rubus parviflorus Shrub FACU
Elderberry Sambucus racemosa Shrub FACU
Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus Shrub FACU
Sword fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous FACU
South Staging Area and Bypass Pipe Alignment
California brome Bromus carinatus Herbaceous Not listed
Blue wild rye Elymus glaucus Herbaceous FACU
Red fescue Festuca rubra Herbaceous FAC
Regreen sterile wheatgrass Triticum aestivum Herbaceous Not listed
June 2015
10 DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
There will be no grubbing on the north side of the river, but there may be some minor
clearing to lay the bypass pipe. No trees, shrubs, or woody vegetation will be cleared. Any
cleared areas will be hydroseeded with a mix of native grasses.
Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan
Per RMC 4-3-090 D.2.d.xii, maintenance and monitoring will be conducted to ensure that
buffer mitigation goals, objectives, and performance standards are achieved. The
maintenance and monitoring program will be conducted for a minimum of 5 years to ensure
plants become established and develop adequate native vegetation cover. If monitoring
activities determine that performance standards are not being met, contingency measures
will be implemented to remedy onsite problems.
Monitoring Plan
King County will arrange for a qualified biologist to perform monitoring of the buffer
enhancement areas to ensure compliance with the performance standards listed above. The
site will be monitored annually for a minimum of 5 years following construction. If monitoring
results determine performance standards are not being achieved, corrective actions will be
taken (see Monitoring, Site Maintenance, and Contingency Plan below).
Year 0 Monitoring
The monitoring visit at the end of the first growing season following construction will be
conducted to establish permanent sampling plots and photograph points (as needed), inspect
the plantings, identify mortality, and specify quantities and locations of plants needing
replacement (see Year 0 performance standard above). In addition, the site will be inspected
for the presence of invasive or exotic plant species (see performance standard for all years,
above).
Years 1, 2, 3, and 4 Monitoring
During the second, third, fourth, and fifth years of monitoring (Year 1 through Year 4),
mitigation areas will be evaluated and photographs will be taken from each of the permanent
photograph points. At the end of the fifth year growing season (Year 4), if performance
standards are not achieved, the monitoring period shall be extended for as many years as
necessary until they are achieved.
All Years
Every year mitigation areas will be monitored for invasive species cover to ensure percentage
of the buffer mitigation areas covered by invasive and nonnative species does not exceed
15 percent.
Site Maintenance and Contingency Plan
Following initial planting, the planting contractor will be responsible for maintaining
100 percent plant survival within the wetland and buffer enhancement areas for a minimum
of 1 year as per the planting contract plans. In accordance with the 1-year plant survival
guarantee, the contractor will replace plants that have died during the first year. Before
plants are replaced, the contractor will consult with the project biologist arranged by King
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 11
County to determine why certain species are not surviving and, if necessary, which native
plant substitutions are appropriate. In addition, throughout the summer of the first year, the
contractor will be responsible for irrigating as frequently as necessary to ensure healthy plant
conditions.
King County will be responsible for managing the establishment of plants from the second
through the fifth year, with the goal of meeting all applicable performance standards listed
above. If percent cover requirements are not met, maintenance activities may include, but
are not limited to, plant replacement, plant supplement, plant substitution, adjustment of
planting layout to reflect specific or changing site conditions, weed control, and installation
and adjustment of plant protection devices.
An integrated pest management (IPM) approach will be adhered to for invasive species
management within buffer mitigation areas (all years performance standard), including
limited use of herbicides per RMC 4-3-090 D.2.d.xi. Invasive plant species will be pulled by
hand to the extent practical. If herbicides are deemed appropriate for use to control invasive
species, only those herbicides approved for use in aquatic ecosystems by Ecology (e.g.,
Rodeo, Aquamaster) will be selected. Herbicides will be applied by a licensed applicator.
June 2015
DRAFT Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project 13
R EFERENCES
Herrera. 2014a. Biological Evaluation for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal
Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County Department of
Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. February 5, 2015.
Herrera. 2014b. Habitat Data Report for the Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal
Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County Department of
Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. March 2, 2015.
Herrera. 2014c. Wetland and Stream Delineation Report. Black River Pump Station Sediment
Removal Project. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. for King County
Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division. May 16, 2014.
Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington — Revised.
Ecology Publication 04-06-025. Washington State Department of Ecology. August 2004.
Stevens, M.L. and R. Vanbianchi. 1993. Restoring Wetlands In Washington: a Guidebook for
Wetland Restoration Planning and Implementation. Washington State Department of Ecology,
Olympia, Washington.
<https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/93017.html>.
Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and US Environmental Protection Agency
Region 10. 2006. Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 1: Agency Policies and
Guidance (Version 1). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-011a.
Olympia, Washington. March 2006.
APPENDIX A
Photos
June 2015
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-1
Photo 1. Riparian vegetation on the south bank of the Black River.
Photo 2. Top of bank along the north edge of lawn where staging and
stockpiling will take place. The large shore pine to be removed is in the
background, far right.
June 2015
A-2 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Photo 3. Road on north side of Black River and typical Wetland D
buffer vegetation in foreground.
Photo 4. Nonnative vegetation on the north bank of the Black River
downstream from the pump station.
June 2015
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-3
Photo 5. Wingwall and stream bank on the north side of the Black River
upstream of the pump station.
Photo 6. Yellow flag iris on the north bank of the Black River upstream
of the pump station.
June 2015
A-4 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
Photos 7 and 8. Buffer vegetation in the proposed south side access road alignment.
June 2015
Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project A-5
Photo 9. Buffer vegetation in the proposed bypass pipe alignment – east
of the pump station.
Photo 10. Buffer vegetation in the proposed bypass pipe alignment –
west of the pump station.
June 2015
A-6 Wetland and Stream Buffer Mitigation Report—Black River Pump Station Sediment Removal Project
APPENDIX B
Planting Plan
Figure 1Black River Pump StationSediment Removal ProjectBuffer Revegetation PlanO:\proj\Y2010\10-04766-065\CAD\Dwg\Mitigation Report\Figure 1 - Planting Areas.dwgScale in Feet02550100LEGENDSEEDING AREABYPASS PIPE ALIGNMENTPLANTING AREASOUTH STAGING AREAACCESS ROAD AREA
Figure 2Black River Pump StationSediment Removal ProjectPlanting Schedule and DetailsO:\proj\Y2010\10-04766-065\CAD\Dwg\Mitigation Report\Figure 2 - Planting Schedule and Details.dwgSTRATUMSCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMEWETLANDINDICATORSTATUSPLANTMATERIAL SIZEON CENTER(O.C.) SPACINGTOTAL PLANTQUANTITIESPLANT ZONE QUANTITIESACCESS ROADAREASOUTH STAGINGAREASHRUBAMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIASERVICEBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBCORNUS SERICEARED OSIER DOGWOODFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBCORYLUS CORNUTABEAKED HAZELNUTFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBMAHONIA AQUIFOLIUMTALL OREGON GRAPEFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBPHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUSPACIFIC NINEBARKFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBROSA NUTKANANOOTKA ROSEFAC1 GALLON4' O.C.91982SHRUBRUBUS PARVIFLORUSTHIMBLEBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBSALIX SITCHENSISSITKA WILLOWFACW1 GALLON4' O.C.99SHRUBSAMBUCUS RACEMOSARED ELDERBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282SHRUBSYMPHORICARPOS ALBUSSNOWBERRYFACU1 GALLON4' O.C.8282GROUNDCOVERFRAGERIA VESCAWOODLAND STRAWBERRYFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.5555GROUNDCOVERPOLYSTICHUM MUNITUMSWORD FERNFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.1789551734GROUNDCOVERTELLIMA GRANDIFLORAFRINGECUPFACU1 GALLON2' O.C.5555GROUNDCOVERTOLMIEA MENZIESIIPIGGYBACK PLANTFAC1 GALLON2' O.C.5555PLANT SCHEDULEEXCAVATE SOIL FOR PLANTING TO DIMENSIONSSHOWN. FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL AND WATERSETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POCKETS. DO NOTDAMAGE ROOTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS24" DIAMETER BARK OR WOODCHIP MULCH RING, KEEP 2"AWAY FROM TRUNK OF PLANTFINISH GRADEREMOVE CONTAINER PRIOR TOPLANTING. DURING PLANTINGOPERATIONS GENTLY LOOSENAND SPREAD ROOTSCOMPRESS SOIL INTO SMALL, FLAT TOPPEDMOUND BENEATH ROOTBALL FOR SUPPORT 6" GREATERTHANROOTBALL ORCONTAINERDEPTHPLANT AT SAMELEVEL AS GROWNIN POTEXCAVATE SOIL FOR PLANTING TO DIMENSIONSSHOWN. FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL AND WATERSETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POCKETS. DO NOTDAMAGE ROOTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS24" DIAMETER BARK OR WOOD CHIPMULCH RING, 4" THICK LAYER, KEEP 2"AWAY FROM TRUNK OF PLANTFINISH GRADEREMOVE CONTAINER PRIOR TO PLANTING.DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS GENTLY LOOSENAND SPREAD ROOTS AT BOTTOM OF ROOTBALLCOMPRESS SOIL INTO SMALL, FLAT TOPPEDMOUND BENEATH ROOTBALL FOR SUPPORTPLANT AT SAMELEVEL AS GROWNIN POTEXISTING GROUNDMAX.ONE GALLON CONTAINER PLANTING DETAILONE GALLON CONTAINERPLANTING ON SLOPE DETAIL 6" GREATERTHANROOTBALL ORCONTAINERDEPTHSTRATUMSCIENTIFIC NAMECOMMON NAMEWETLANDINDICATORSTATUSPERCENT OF MIXBY SEED COUNTPERCENT OF MIXBY SEED WEIGHTPOUNDS PURELIVE SEED (PLS)PER ACREHERBACEOUSBROMUS CARINATUSCALIFORNIA BROMENOT LISTED3021.1815.68HERBACEOUSELYMUS GLAUCUSBLUE WILDRYEFACU3015.7511.66HERBACEOUSFESTUCA RUBRARED FESCUEFAC304.243.14HERBACEOUSTRITICUM AESTIVUMREGREEN STERILE WHEATGRASSNOT LISTED1058.8443.56BYPASS PIPE AREA AND SOUTH STAGING AREA SEED MIXNOTES:1.REMOVE ANY NOXIOUS AND/OR NONNATIVE WEEDS FROM PLANTING ZONES PRIOR TOPLANTING.2.THE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE GRADES PRIOR TO MULCHAPPLICATION AND PLANT INSTALLATION.3.PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PROJECTREPRESENTATIVE.4.PLANTS SHALL BE TAGGED FOR IDENTIFICATION AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECTREPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5.KEEP PLANTS SHADED UNTIL TIME OF PLANTING. DO NOT LET PLANT MATERIAL SIT INSUN OR DRY OUT BEFORE PLANTING.6.PLANT GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUBS IN CLUSTERS OF THREE, FIVE, AND SEVEN. EACHCLUSTER SHALL BE ONE SPECIES. EVENLY SPACE CLUSTERS THROUGHOUT PLANTZONES. INTENT OF PLANTING IS TO APPEAR NATURAL AND INFORMAL.7.THE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE PLANT LAYOUT BEFOREINSTALLATION.8.APPLY SEED MIX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH OCTOBER 1 AND/OR BETWEENMARCH 1 AND MAY 15.9.INSTALL SHRUBS, AND GROUNDCOVER BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND MARCH 1 OF THEFIRST DORMANT SEASON FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION.