Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA_Clarification_190621_v1.pdf June 13, 2019 Matt Herrera, AICP City of Renton Community & Economic Development 1055 South Grady Road Renton, WA 98057 Re: Cedar River Apartments: SEPA Clarification The Watershed Company Reference Number: 170314 Dear Matt: This letter relates to the Cedar River Apartments project (PRE17-000246) and accompanies additional information intended to clarify several outstanding SEPA concerns with the project. Specifically, based upon prior correspondence with the City, two primary issues of concern with the project were identified – 1) traffic, and 2) channel migration. As outlined in an April 2, 2019 letter, the City’s Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determined that these two areas of concern were likely to result in the issuance of a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS), requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). As such, the applicant has commissioned additional investigation of both outstanding concerns, a summary of which is included in this letter. Additionally, the prior prepared SEPA Checklist has been revised to account for this information. New documentation, submitted concurrent with this letter includes the following: • Traffic Impact Analysis Supplemental Report for Cedar River Apartments, Renton, Washington, May 28, 2019 (William Popp Associates) • Bulkhead Wall Stability Addendum, Cedar River Apartments, June 10, 2019 (Terracon Consultants, Inc.) • Re: Bulkhead Wall Stability Addendum, June 12, 2019 (DCI Engineers) The revised SEPA Checklist and addition prepared documentation shall constitute a supplement to the previously submitted SEPA Checklist, pursuant to WAC 197-11- 350(4). Cedar River Apartments SEPA Clarification June 13, 2019 Page 2 Traffic ERC Concern: Proposed impacts noted in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) indicate a Level of Service (LOS) reduction following completion of the project that would fall below operational standards of ‘D’ identified for classified arterial streets in Renton Comprehensive Plan Policy T- 48.C.1. Additionally, the TIA states that the identified LOS does not account for I-405 ramp meters for the SR169/Sunset/Bronson/I-405 SB Ramp and SR169/I-405 NB Ramp intersections referred to as Intersections 1 and 2 in the TIA, respectively. This omission is likely to result in a LOS that does not reflect the actual operating conditions of the intersections. The TIA indicates reductions in LOS for both intersections following completion of the project. Applicant Clarification: A supplement to the original TIA has been prepared and is included with this letter. As requested, the supplement (Traffic Impact Analysis Supplemental Report for Cedar River Apartments, May 28, 2019 – William Popp Associates) now factors I-405 ramp meter data into intersection analyses. Additionally, the supplement includes ‘without project’ level of service results for all phases of proposed development. Further, as summarized in the supplement, levels of service for analyzed intersections are expected to be maintained or improved. Thus, no significant adverse traffic impacts will occur. Channel Migration ERC Concern: Based on the Cedar River Channel Migration Study prepared by King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, the subject property is located within a Severe Hazard Area of the Cedar River’s Channel Migration Zone. The study does not account for the existing armoring located along the property’s shoreline, however submitted documents by the applicant to date do not analyze the integrity of the wall and whether it can withstand forces of the river’s flow over the life of the project. Additionally, the applicant’s document “Review of Shoreline Stabilization Alternatives for the Cedar River Apartments Project” prepared by Golder Associates recommends a combination of rigid and flexible works along the property’s river frontage that may be in direct conflict with the City’s Shoreline Master Program Regulations. Renton Municipal Code 4-3-090E.9.d prohibits new structural flood hazard reduction measures within a Channel Migration Zone or floodway for new residential development. Applicant Clarification: The referenced report by Golder Associates did not account for the structural integrity of the existing wall. As such, additional investigation was undertaken. Specifically, Terracon Consultants, Inc. conducted geotechnical explorations within proximity of the existing wall (Bulkhead Wall Stability Addendum, Cedar River Apartments, June 10, 2019). Based upon the results of this work, DCI Engineers then completed a stability review of the wall (Re: Bulkhead Wall Stability Addendum, June 12, 2019). These efforts concluded that the existing wall includes a widespread concrete base, that is of high strength. As such, the wall was found to be stable, with no signs of Cedar River Apartments SEPA Clarification June 13, 2019 Page 3 future failure. Further, no new steps will be necessary to decrease pressures on the wall or structurally reinforce it. Consistent with the assessment work done by King County as part of the 2015 Cedar River Channel Migration Study, the stable wall constitutes an artificial structure that restrains channel migration. Therefore, although mapped as within a channel migration zone, upland areas of the site are effectively protected from channel migration, due to the presence of the stable wall. Thus, no significant adverse impacts will occur related to channel migration. Summary The additional provided information on both of the above topics is intended to supplement prior submitted information and seeks to further clarify these issues of concern. As described herein, the proposed project will maintain or result in an improvement to levels of services at analyzed intersections. Further, the existing wall that protects the site from potential channel migration zone impacts has been deemed stable. As such, neither issue constitutes a significant adverse impact, as defined by WAC 197-11-794. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Kenny Booth, AICP Senior Planner / Principal