Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLeft side of file Y o� .r CITY )F RENTON A ha + Hearing Examiner .�j�N�o,� Kathy Keolker,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman March 21, 2006 Howard Seelig Seelig Family Properties PO Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 SUBJECT: Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Seelig: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Hearing Examiner Business Park approval.No appeals were filed.This decision is final and you may proceed. The conditions listed in the City of Renton Hearing Examiner Report & Decision must be satisfied before the final plat can be recorded. If you have any questions regarding the recording process or any other matters, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olsen at(425)430-7235. Sincerely, Nancy Thompson Secretary to Hearing Examiner cc: Jill Ding, Development Services Jennifer Henning,Development Services Bryan Borchers,Architect All Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6515 R E N T O N MThis—n--.tai—Ella/---1.H znoi--.f--- AHEAD OF THE CURVE 4w y CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 7th day of February, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Bryan Borchers Contact Howard Seelig Owner/Applicant June Huston POR W. Elper POR Regina Sparks POR John Atzbach POR Emily Rollins POR David J. Scott POR Susan Irwin POR (Signature of Sender): ZL't�4 J4,6x-W STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 2f Notary Public in and for the State of Wa-01ng o � SII . ys Notary (Print): 0 a k-1 wl�xan cLt/ ' 4 My appointment expires: J Project Name: Kennydale Business Park '' ProjectNumber: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING February 14, 2006 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. A surface parking lot is proposed on the east side of Building A. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. PROJECT NAME: Vuong Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-05-156, SHPL-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 49,105-square foot (1.13-acre) lot into 7 lots in the R-8 (Residential 8 dwelling units per acre) zone. The short plat would result in a density of 7.91 dwelling units per acre. The existing house would remain and the detached garage and shed would be demolished. The proposed lots would range in size from 4,500 square feet to 7,162 square feet. Lot 1 would access from NE 10th Street. Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 would access directly from a new public half-street running perpendicular to NE 10th St. along the east edge of the site. Lots 4 and 5 would be reached via an access easement over Lots 3 and 6 from the new street. Two of six existing trees would be removed. HEX Agenda 2-14-06 ,%me City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST. Public Hearing Date: February 14, 2006 Project Name: Kennydale Business Park Owner: G21 Company Applicant: Howard Seelig P.O. Box 1925 Seelig Family Properties Bellevue, WA 98009 P.O. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 Contact: Bryan Borchers CDA Pirscher Architects, Inc. P.O. Box 55429 Seattle, WA 98155 File Number: LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF Planner: Jill K. Ding, Associate Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. A surface parking lot is proposed on the east side of Building A. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. Project Location: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street(SE 76th Street in City of Newcastle) , SITE 119 City of Renton P/B/PW Department y,,,,,,+ preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14, 2006 Page 2 of 10 B. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Map(dated received September 21, 2005). Exhibit No. 3: Site Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Landscape Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 5: Preliminary Landscape Analysis (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 6: Site Survey(dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 7: Water and Sewer Plan (dated September 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 8: Drainage Plan (dated September 26, 2001). Exhibit No. 9: Existing Tree Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 10: Elevations (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 11: Building B P4 Parking - Floor Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 12: Building B Ground Floor Level—Floor Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 13: Building A P3 Parking Level/Building B 2nd Floor — Floor Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 14: Building A 15t Floor—Floor Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 15: Building A 2nd Floor—Floor Plan (dated August 15, 2005). Exhibit No. 16: ERC Mitigation Measures (dated June 20, 2005) Exhibit No. 17: Zoning Map C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: G21 Company, P.O. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Commercial Corridor(CC) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North: Multi Family Residential—zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) East: Single Family Residential—City of Newcastle South: Multi Family Residential West: Self-storage—zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) 6. Access: NE 48th Street via two internal driveways 7. Site Area: 209,468 sq.ft. (4.8 acres) 8. Project Data: Area comments Existing Building Area: N/A N/A New Building Area: 123,604 sq. ft. N/A HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department `*011Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE.February 14, 2006 Page 3 of 10 Total Building Area: 123,604 sq. ft. N/A D. HISTOR/CAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 5100 11/01/2004 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004 Annexation N/A 4318 06/17/1991 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.A: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-040: Commercial Corridor Business Designations—Automall District 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations—General Section 4-4-070: Landscaping Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Community Design Element 3. Economic Development G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8 acre vacant site zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet and is two-stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structured parking under the south section of the building. The subject site is located on the southern side of NE 48th Street at approximately the 1900 block. The subject site abuts the City of Newcastle on the eastern and southern property lines. The topography of the subject site slopes from east to west at an average slope of 30 percent and contains some localized areas where the slope exceeds 40 percent meeting the definition of a Protected Slope. An Exception through Modification was requested to modify the Protected Slopes based on the HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department �We preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14, 2006 Page 4 of 10 applicant's analysis, which indicated that the slopes were artificially created. The modification was granted, therefore the Protected Slopes may be modified. The landscape plan indicates the perimeter of the site will be landscaped primarily with Red Sunset Maple, Sugar Maple, Austrian Black Pine, Okame Flowering Cherry, and Aristocrat Pear, additional landscaping primarily of various shrub species, lawn, and ground cover will be planted within the parking area and adjacent to the proposed structure. The structures are proposed at a height of approximately 48 feet. The front of the proposed buildings is oriented to the east, towards the P1 parking level and the rear of the buildings face to the west towards the P5 parking area. NE 48th Street runs alonM the north property line of the subject site. Access to the site is proposed via two driveways off of NE 48 Street. A majority of the parking spaces provided are located within the structure in a parking garage. Additional spaces including handicap accessible parking spaces are located along the eastern and western sides of the buildings. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on November 1, 2005 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the project. The DNS-M included nine (9) mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on November 7, 2005 and ended on November 21, 2005. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance— Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 6. This project shall be subject to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 1. 7. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department retiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14, 2006 Page 5 of 10 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, estimated at 1,037 trips. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E, "The Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: (A) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS &POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Commercial Corridor(CC). The intent of Commercial Corridor areas is to evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities, and boulevard treatment. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Commercial Corridor Land Use Element Policy LU-349. Support development plans incorporating the following features: 1) Share access points and fewer curb cuts; 2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels; 3) Shared parking facilities; 4)Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5) Centralized signage; 6) Unified development concepts;and 7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. The proposal would create two curb cuts for access to the property; all of the businesses to be located within the proposed office park would share these access points. No internal circulation is proposed among adjacent parcels as the parcels to the south and west and currently developed with existing structures that would not be conducive to common access points and the eastern portion of the subject site is encumbered by slopes some of which exceed a grade of 40 percent, thereby making access to the eastern parcel very difficult. Structured parking is proposed within Building A and Building B and all parking onsite would be shared parking. The submitted landscape plan indicates that landscaping will be installed along the site's NE 48th Street right-of- way and will soften the visual impacts of the proposed buildings. Signage for the proposed office park will be reviewed at a later date, however it will be required to comply with the City's sign regulations. HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department 1400, `%+Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14,2006 Page 6 of 10 Policy LU-350. New development in Commercial Corridor designated areas should be encouraged to implement uniform site standards, including: 1) Minimum lot depth of 200 feet, 2) Maximum height of ten (10) stories within office zoned designations, 3) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice; 4) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer, 5) Front setback without frontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk;and 6) Common signage and lighting system. The lot depth of the subject site exceeds 200 feet, the proposed structures would not exceed a height of 10 stories, the parking will be provided within the structure and at the side or rear of the buildings, the setback are proposed to be landscaped, no driveways are located between the building and the sidewalk. No signage or lighting information has been submitted, as these items will be reviewed at a latter date. However compliance with the City's lighting and signage regulations will be required. Policy LU-357. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged as part of new development or redevelopment. A grassy area is proposed in front of the building along NE 48th Street that could be utilized by the public and a plaza is proposed on the eastern portion of the building at the main entrance. In addition decks are proposed on the proposed buildings. Policy LU-358. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along roadways, to reduce visual impact. Landscaping is proposed within the surface parking area. Community Design Element: Objective CD-l: New commercial buildings should be architecturally compatible with their surroundings in terms of their bulk and scale, exterior materials, and color when existing development is consistent with the adopted land use vision. The bulk and scale, and exterior materials would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The parcel to the west contains a self-storage development and the parcel to the south is a multi family residential development. The proposed buildings would be 38,934 gross square feet and 84,670 gross square feet which is compatible with the existing buildings in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed building materials include concrete, aluminum, glass and standard building colors associated with the proposed office park. Policy CD-44. Development should provide appropriate landscaping and facade treatment when located along designated City arterials or adjacent to less intense developments in order to mitigate potentially adverse visual or other impacts. Landscaping is proposed along all portions of the site that abut or are adjacent to less intensive residential uses. Policy CD-50. Trees should be planted along residential streets, in parking lots requiring landscaping, and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises. Trees should be retained whenever possible and maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each type. A landscape plan was submitted with the project application and a variety of trees are proposed within the surface parking lot, along the NE 48th Street frontage, and in addition several trees located on the eastern portion of the parcel are proposed to be retained. Policy CD-62: Landscaped parking strips should be considered for use as a safety buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles along arterials and collector streets. The perimeter and interior of the parking areas would be landscaped with a variety of plant materials to create a buffer and screening of the parking stalls. Along NE 48th Street, landscaping and street trees would be installed. Economic Development HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department ' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14,2006 Page 7 of 10 Policy ED-3. Lands with adequate existing infrastructure should be given priority for development. The subject site has adequate infrastructure in place, with some relocation and extension of utilities required to provide for the development. Objective ED-B: Expand the retail and office base within the City. The proposal would generate new retail and employment opportunities with the City. (B) CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The CA zone is established to provide opportunities for a wide range of commercial uses and to set site development standards that transition the commercial area from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment. The CA zone allows retail and office uses as primary permitted uses. Development Standards Lot Dimensions—There are no minimum requirements for lot size, lot width or depth within the CA zone unless located in a special corridor of which this site is not. The subject site is 4.8 acres in area with a lot width of 325 feet and a lot depth of 635 feet. Building Lot Coverage — The maximum lot coverage allowed is 65 percent of the total lot area. The overall total of the building footprints for proposed Building A and B would be 68,088 square feet. This generates a total building coverage of 33.5 percent (68,088 sq. ft. / 209,476 total site sq. ft. = 32.5 percent), which is below the maximum lot coverage permitted. Setbacks / Landscaping — The minimum front yard setback is 10 ft. with no maximum. The minimum side yard along a street is 10 ft. and no rear or interior side yard setbacks unless the property abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone. The site is surrounded by commercially zoned properties on the north and west and residentially zoned properties on the south and east. Therefore the proposed structures shall maintain a side yard setback from the eastern property line of 15 feet and a rear yard setback from the southern property line of 15 feet, no side yard setback is required along the western property line. Proposed Buildings A and B would maintain a front yard setback of 20 feet along the northern property line, a side yard setback of 159 feet from the eastern property line, a side yard setback of 30 feet from the western property line and a rear yard setback of 40 feet from the southern property line. Landscaping would be provided within the required front, rear and eastern side yard. In addition a large vegetated area located on the eastern portion of the property would not be developed. The proposed streets trees along NE 48th Street would include Red Sunset Maple and Sugar Maple along with sod as a ground cover. Other types of vegetation proposed within the parking area, setback areas, and surrounding the building would include a variety of tree species, shrubs, and ground cover. The trees proposed include an Austrian Black Pine, Douglas Fir, Western Hemlock, Okame Flowering Cherry, and Aristocrat Pear tree. The shrubs proposed include Redtwig Dogwood, Fraser's Phonia, Kelseyi Dogwood, Evergreen Huckleberry, Macranthazalea, Sarcococca, "David's Viburnum", and Wood's Rose. The groundcover species proposed include Japanese Spurge, Vancouver Jade Kinnikinnik, and Salal. All landscaping is required to be fully irrigated unless drought tolerant plants are used. The proposed landscaping, plant size, type, and location, is appropriate for the proposed development. The preliminary landscape plan illustrates materials that would enhance the visual character of the proposed Kennydale Business Park. The surface parking areas are required to be landscaped. When there are more than 100 spaces, 35 sq. ft. of landscaping per space is required. With 117 parking spaces, 4,095 sq. ft. is required, the applicant is proposing 12,486 sq. ft. of landscaping within the parking lot. In addition, all parking spaces are required to be located within 50 feet of a landscaped area. Some of the parking stalls located on the western side of the proposed structure are not located within 50 feet of a landscaped area. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan be submitted with the building permit application showing all parking spaces within 50 feet of a landscaped area. HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department *VW Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE.,February 14, 2006 Page 8 of 10 Building Limitations -There is no maximum gross floor area for a single commercial use or for a single office use except for within a special corridor of which this project is not within. Building Height— The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The height of the proposed structures would be 47 feet 11 inches to the top of the roof structure. All structures would be less than the maximum allowed height and thus in compliance with the CA standard. Screening — The submitted site plan indicates that rooftop equipment will be screened appropriately. In addition, the site plan submitted indicates that a refuse and recyclable area will be located near the southeast corner of Building A. A minimum of 2 square feet per 1,000 gross square feet of building area is required for a recyclable area and a minimum of 4 square feet per 1,000 gross square feet of building area is required for a refuse area. Based on a total gross building square footage of 123,604, 247 square feet of recyclable area is required and 494 square feet of refuse area is required. The proposed refuse and recyclable area exceeds the minimum requirements. The refuse and recyclable area is required to maintain a minimum setback of 50 feet from a residential zone. The proposed location complies with the 50-foot setback requirement. The proposed enclosure shall be screened by a 6-foot high wall or fence. Screening details were not submitted with the land use application. Staff recommends as a condition of site plan approval that the applicant be required to submit a screening and enclosure detail for the proposed dumpster that meets City standards prior to building permit issuance. Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations — Parking regulations require a specific number of spaces based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The proposal for two office buildings has a required parking ratio of a minimum of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area and a maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. The applicant indicates that the total square footage for both proposed buildings is 123,604 square feet. Based on the parking ratio allowed for an office use a minimum of 371 parking spaces would be required and a maximum of 556 parking spaces would be permitted. The applicant proposes to provide a total of 414 parking stalls, which is within the range of parking spaces required. The parking spaces are in compliance with the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. Driveways—The proposed site plan shows two driveways accessing the subject site off of NE 48th Street. The internal vehicular circulation pattern shows two way drive aisles, however there are some one way drive aisles into and out of the structured parking areas. (C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE The subject site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning designation and is bordered on the north by multi family residential development, on the east by single family residential development, on the south by multi family residential development and on the west by a motel and a self storage. The proposal is not anticipated to adversely affect the commercial properties abutting the western property line of the subject site. The impacts that the proposed business park may have on the abutting residential properties would be mitigated by the landscaping proposed and retained along the northern, eastern, and southern property lines. In addition, the proposed business park sits at a lower elevation than the existing single family residences located along the eastern property line, thereby reducing its visual impact on those residences. Staff anticipates the project to add value to the site and further enhance the retail opportunities in the area. The additional retail uses would potentially increase the amount of activity in the area. Construction activities would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department 8#AW `preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:February 14, 2006 Page 9 of 10 (D) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The proposed structures would be located on the western portion of the subject site to reduce the impact of the proposed structures on the slopes located on the eastern potion of the subject site. The structures would comply with all of the required front, side, and rear yard setback requirements. In addition, adequate parking will be provided on-site (structured and surface parking)for the patrons of the commercial uses. The landscape plan indicates that sufficient street trees will be planted along the site's NE 48th Street frontage to buffer the proposed structure from the noise and visual impacts of traffic on NE 48th Street. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. (E) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposed retail/commercial development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. The development of the site provides improvements to infrastructure, landscaping and lighting and additional employment opportunities. (F) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was required as part of the project and submitted with the land use application. The TIA was prepared by William Popp Associates, dated June 11, 2004. Two driveways on the south side of NE 48th Street would provide access to the site. The site development proposes a total of 414 parking stalls (117 surface stalls and 297 structured stalls). An internal 24-foot wide two-way driveway is shown on the site plan encircles the buildings, connecting the two driveways. Half street improvements will be required along the frontage of the site. Additionally, the Lake Washington Boulevard/NE 44th/1-405 NB ramps intersection is regulated by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)and is considering an all-way stop control for this intersection. Our transportation division has apprised WSDOT of this project. The ERC placed a mitigation measure on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. (G) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The proposed buildings are designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the buildings and the site. The design of the building will not result in excessive shading of the property. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the building to provide for normal airflow. The City of Renton Development Standards regulates exterior onsite lighting, including security lighting. Compliance with these regulations (RMC 4-4-075) ensures that all building lights are directed onto the building or the ground and cannot trespass beyond the property lines. Staff does not anticipate that exterior lighting would impact the surrounding buildings and the adjacent uses provided code requirements are met. (H) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction HEX RPT05-114 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Nwe °preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA-05-114, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE.February 14,2006 Page 10 of 10 Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with an office development. (1) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE Fire Department, Police and Parks staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) required the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee in the amount of$0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, ERC also required the applicant to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project was required by the City's ERC prior to the issuance of building permits. Water service and other utilities are available and would be extended and or relocated as necessary to the structures as required by City code. (J) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would develop a site that is currently vacant and would not result in neighborhood deterioration and blight. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Kennydale Business Park, Project File No. LUA-05-114, SA-H, ECF subject to the following conditions. 1. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application showing all parking spaces within 50 feet of a landscaped area. 2. A screening and enclosure detail for the proposed dumpster that meets City standards shall be submitted with the building permit application. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two(2)years from the final approval (signature) date. HEX RPT05-114 • _L q�+�filei .+040. t �Pe LOT 2 Z � � ,•//.IJ.A con-am x• - R :o* MiOea-pot117ot4 �tf -` ,---' d "�• r, Q LOT 1 tma 4 ` m s i - Ow I .N of l Nerez•4r ,H•ai It is J i ? 1 y 2 ♦ .1 ;7 Li lop y~/ ° d h � � �lam..w..sy � a+s.a.•r � ri „ n ` J K v lot 2 `* r 3 r t s C °r4 13 r tib i ti ?•`+ 183 +.7�' /,t`. gp 182 167 p'e)'�a,sf2 2 (j- 5 •----._.�..._�._r �€,fit '�� .." rBe-knmr St i/bbQ'��w ti �� 3 c' •a-te`-•'�- h.to - .� f¢9.Y9 �j .✓ `p,' 5 Ait f.►.cf �i .w'ais•wr f to q. L L L'D.JMAi�j �4 R ♦� C F ° 27 z v Loi 1 6$ $Q .aOtt a K' zr *o a .y0hit ldf+ 77MmM47- . r. n..sa Jw*.. 415 ati7•Q%+'swe. { ,slat° t 444 u ' SL.4l1C4�P R t y� t ^ ... +t i. us) I` aN . fal :71xM qty t, 183 !y ' 166 �• 155 I i 4! i, 1x Y LAT 1 :� as ss-i+� LOT 3 11 I[ kt ro +,l.�e LAT 2 Wy •i!� � N REN: SP 011-87 . 8802169005 tO,yG 3'e9L 3 e+�,i iy p ws +' •�° •� , �y e 1A tt a4 r5 �a5 ae.' ''/ r�7• d of N.ZI if .✓e+�Jrrtsrcc �,vvsM.r Alll•Sr .s`:n u.•+ms-Rt"w.s=;), , --w«sca Y > v/r eRs, +e34 / SE. SOT1{ ST Aelrfo,J msn. 427C L ~ bOfi.74 N 68-4G "WI h y - _ l£ e SCALE: N € RESIDENTIAL ZONE LU arrTawrr __- 15'LRARYARD SETBACK 635.1Y ------------- -----_------_----- III 1 I tr----- ————— IS'L7PRJSCAPIIJ�s SETBACK----------__— � I I I I I I q 7 1- _ FI FARKING LEVEL -19vSTALL5 -► "'m 11mv Fil og jtl. \ I +wa Cn gm— I f $ I a c I LU BUILDING A , WING I BUILDING A , WING 2 f Z Ii ROOF SHOWN ROOF SHOWN NI BUILDING B, WING i ROOF SyWN BUILDING B, WING 2 (e ". .m ROOF SHOWN " I — N —1 IIS, F5 PARKING LEVEL - 22 STALLSLLJ z I1"WATER LINE_ ° - _ .rrwx ae Q I a»o, . unarm - mw Z p LL N SITE PLAN 1 11_20i-Ou w,auee.os..us ^ww+o rw.am. mwae »i+nw ro.aas w ttuu rorr i� 11 %p�ip��%iii"ii'iii'ira0i'''O�'i♦i0'i♦i♦'►'i'i0i'i♦i'i'♦'i'Oi'i"'i'•°i°i"♦i♦ii♦y..":ate I'M --P,�A�a°Oi"♦♦♦♦•°♦♦0000"O♦'♦°♦°Oy r�♦�♦�♦• • ♦♦• • 4-14 /.��••�•♦�•♦•.•�• �aO:!i!0•!♦!OildOi!♦!0•!♦lOili!OOy�iy�!•p!•20y?"�pl�"I"�lJi!O�♦:00!�ii♦i♦sp!O♦•y♦•y♦y♦y♦y�p♦yi♦iii0•i♦i0♦y0ii►'iri•'♦�00'�►♦y♦y. i�0♦0FBI •♦•'♦'p0ir���.!,/.. i i"i-Oi"ice°i�«0♦i0i'♦�rDOi♦�°ice ri�OrrOrriiti�"i�♦►i--i°i4��i:'`�'...c, ._,:.o.•_.♦ c�_r 9'.►•!�� r ♦ s�0i��•0_i• ♦!��!.Aiyp�!•♦ 100.0iy ♦ i►•'�iy0ii?►� •"•9,�y; iii♦i'i00i♦i♦i"i"ii'iiyi'Oi'i'♦♦♦♦p'y'y'�iy'y'yp'0y"y'Oi►y0"i'i'M♦1M♦ -iW.-'.� • as ;-y>isliAtiap°i'y9tii"A♦ry°a♦ii♦i♦iti00y 'NO WO �°i♦MO►- ♦i�►�i"-i"rii°r0i•�s:�-+s ,•,�% •'r ��►i♦�0♦O♦♦OOi'OOOOOOy'i°i♦i'OOi'♦i'♦♦i'i'o0i�.�0000000i►00000i'Oi♦yii'iiri'i'i♦i♦i°i'Oi►�0i�♦�♦�r�0♦a"''►♦Oy♦e"0000.M�i�O'i!��0iti�iM�♦�♦y�i''♦�iy1�!��O♦00'!�,p"�♦♦.l.OAFiwyrF��,.,; ♦Oi♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦s♦♦♦ ♦OOi ♦Oyi♦Oi♦i'i♦i'i'i♦i♦i'i0°y0"♦Oy''.♦ioAy♦y"OOpp00"yp°'♦y♦'yp'yoi♦♦�i�♦'►i'i�0♦A���,►Oyu►0♦i�y0�ti� �'�Oyi!♦0:►�i"''%'"' y'ii'iy0i► �ii♦ 'i�►ii�►i0�►i'i= . �i�;%►►i'i♦ii♦i"Oi♦i♦Oi4ii�i'c���iZ:�i�i'iiii'iiii♦i♦i"i'r♦i♦gib'♦iii!i!♦'!i!i!u!i?i2e2i?i2i0i♦i"i!.'�i':�il�•e'+!i':♦i�O�OO'.!�'D�'"'♦�►�►♦�►Oi°yi`Oyy♦�JiO.ye'�2y♦y♦♦y..+�y�M'♦�1►0'i� L�♦'�0♦ f►"i 09'Mis/' ►►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦!•'►♦• ♦y♦p�0 ♦♦.@�t-e-:-v-r�"r'�►i s'�''.a'' �'.:•W'.♦ia:'-ye•��►�•.6'�Ab�•:•�•��0►�•�•:w����♦O'Dy ori•♦ O�i�i-' y '��♦♦� ♦yi0♦y♦R��`�yF '�i'♦'♦'�'�'�O�'►iii♦♦'iii'O♦ii'i♦Oi'iiy♦c♦�i�ii9�'♦�♦'iMi!►%Oii♦�i�M♦�►�y"i►♦yiJ'itii�►r'♦0♦♦yi'iy�i'i"•�'♦risr°o0'�'�°♦• ♦� ♦•ri y My♦y�• •� • ♦�i ♦R►'♦��O i�'=i. �i♦i'i♦ii!i°is���%A�%yii�i30i6wi♦i Man ♦'ii'♦0`'♦i',��ti����ii'i►i►OO�iy�ti«♦ii�'i•�0'♦'♦�i�i�i�+��i♦r�iv� i'OOOOiy�♦ s�►y�v ♦ ♦0♦ '� Oi'�i0 �► �f y1 �;♦♦♦♦i♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦ r0s♦♦♦♦Oi♦�►♦♦�i♦♦ ! ♦♦Oi♦0 • OO�Oy♦yy�dy♦y♦y0�♦�iy�e.►♦iyp°yy'�i�►'►y♦yi►��'i►'♦�♦iRi�� '�00°'�iMi�O�a!yh�'pijM��► '�O "' ♦♦�►i ��.�` ♦•�i�cr�'�"�. -ego♦i♦i♦%i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i�♦i♦i♦i♦i♦ii°isc♦�i0♦.i'S:'00:�.;:3�.;.O�y��y:•.�i►Ary♦i'♦ii♦d•Qiy♦i�00�'•���i��cyy♦♦y♦�♦�'�i'• •♦♦ R►•�iy►�3 �''�r 0 y��•�►`0�♦.♦ OAS,►ate< .��o�.♦.♦....�.♦�`!i!�!i!i!i0♦yi!�•!��!�yi♦!i!ii!�!-�►°�a?��i!i!s♦♦i'r!♦3yipp"♦y4�_0i�'ry!�♦y!♦p0♦O♦A��Ri♦•�y►0♦ic�S'i.� sir�'0.'3'r9♦:Zy►•y0►i�A �.ii►e •+'.♦� ♦'i°�i�♦•�y�♦.♦ii�►o♦ary♦i♦i-t'.� q�. ,� �v,,__�'►-___ �-'!�►.____-� ----_-e����A��!♦�_ ♦0....►_ . __ AO _ ��0♦�yi♦•'10►♦♦♦_♦«_♦. ♦ •♦♦i�a♦��y►yS♦♦�►♦O�rM�i�•♦yy'i yA�.�,rf '- - - - 0''♦ �►,.►�►_ .s0i�♦d• ♦���«!��♦a�OrO+►.�_Ji'�i♦♦!�� ♦♦ _w�a� ,�iw ♦.�0,+/i�_- \a/fir♦j♦yVyc♦l�.'l./ � It ir! � _' ''' - - _ ��i"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' !�d s�l�= �t<1 ' r. _li-_L _L A1 ii1 0• 4. '� �► ,If • .a.��;Im tJ�V T 'r' '� � V �s1'[s1Ai][A-fi" 1*O� �� �'�'�� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PAR"" .r✓ I. A _ �. sV .. ��/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! - ��� - � . _ 1 F LANDSCAPE ANALYSHE TOTAL SITE SF:209,4615 SF FOOTPRINT AREA:68,088 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:0 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:130,128 SF LANDSCAPE AREA(INTERIOR),. 13,III5F-71- Qq- 3yg'2$3-►'15��5' ��.�V LANDSCAPE AREA(PERIMETER):64,031 SF g PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES:33 BUILDING AREA: BUILDING A WING 1 20,469 SF BUILDING A WING 2 21,633 SF BUILDING A WING I(2ND FLR) 21,284 SF BUILDING A WING 2(2ND FLR) 21,284 SF BUILDING B WING I 6,195 SFaF BUILDING B WING 2 12,316 5F BUILDING B WING I(2ND FLR) 1,651 5F BUILDING B WING 2(2ND FLR) 12,400 SF TOTAL SF 123,604 Sr BUILDING A P2 PARKING 60,024 SF BULDING A 1`13 PARKING 60,024 SF TOTAL SF 3 PER 1000 SF 120,048 SF PARKING REQUIRED; OFFICE: MIN:3 PER 1000 SF 103,541 SF/1,000 x 3 = 311 STALLS MAX:45 PER 1,000 SF Q 103,541 5F/1,000 x 45 -466 STALLS N PARKING PROVIDED: PI AT GRADE PARKING-494TAI" 95 sq,t-s (42 COMPACT®8'-6"x 16'-V) (29 STANDARD m V-0"x 20'-0") ` (8 ACCESSIBLE®10'-(o"x 20'-C") W P2 PARKING LEVEL- 130 STANDARD STALLS N 1`13 PARKING LEVEL - 131 STANDARD STALLSp 114 PARKING LEVEL -36 STANDARD STALLS Z �3 P5 AT GRADE PARKING-22 STANDARD STALLS QQ IIl1WCC a TOTAL: 398 STALLS A-0.1 wn\a5a ItIM 6a V25 en a »Ih\s 9111-n ),rr 02 vrr3�jS aryl on A-A \ --\ =-- \ r b i qr 1?: „�I i' \ I I / / / / / I I �� � //'� l �, 'I I1 � III I I�,/fir• �fv v A I« 1 A l l I , //'i I/ V A v Aa\f v A A l V V A V �f \ v A V �.� \� V '-g \ \ 1vA vAv V O g A\1 �v A v T vq v �1v v t V A A v '4P , I 'N I�—, ` 1 I I!1 I II 1 h�1ll IIII i II / vV `�v 0 V 1 i l V A S �A \ V1�� AIA I I I I' I �Illl � jlll �.� II�Y Il� l 1'11 AI I\ `I lit I If TiII I I 1 1 r I 11� 0_ Ir I 1 1 I ! ,j 11 I I_ ; �` 1 li $ 5 I II I I �.I_II I \ I I I I I I I I I 1 � 8 � III I III I I I Ii If-�Ilil ! lit I I I I rl ' 'i1 iil IIII I. °g I / r ,k 10 Jv aIt S. \ g r ire KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK ti ADDRESS y RENTON,WA "€ SITE SURVEY � 98 I ti M 9 I N 0 [1 NOTE: a MIS DEWLDPYENT SHALL BE CMSTRUCIE0 USRIG QTY LY REHM. YEAR 1997,STANDARD sPECMCAnaxs AND oETARs. Y � Q T To --_a NOTE91 p I.HYDRANTS WUST BE IN PLACE AND w Z Q j SERNWA& PRIOR TO COYBUSRBLE CRNSTRUCROK. p z18'IS 10 BE YAWTAWED KnWEN FACE G 1 W I OF WRRS AND W PROTECTION POST Z N - ANRCATR-.S SEE C.0 R.SM.X.11 M2 n J.A 5"STORT ADAPTER IS REWIRED FCR STEAMER PORTS ONµl THPDRAN 0MGBR SI A CR HYDRANT DE CH DW ENGNEER TO W �I PRONDE CxECN vµW ASSENBtr EX").%SFR,FOC CONN CWW. x„ — — _— — -- — — — _ F CDCE PANEL AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY NEL AND ALCES.ERONDE (y _ 109.56 4R d q WNlrWD-W AS REQUIRED BY i S� RIE a,OF PENTON ERrt DEPARMENr WNNECBax(IDc) COWEECRON SHALL BE 4 W'RANEIER MIM(2)1 I/T Wal DMEQH iITRNCS. TPCPRO\TECIONENGINEERD By DRE W OMSK WATER WIRS ME 1 1/2',UNIFSS < 0IHERMISE VA NOIE\Cb ® 9.INMI9LE PHECN VALW ASSEMBLY - 1 IS FRR ALL BUILRNGS TOA _ 10 SEE 9IffTSEET9 C]Q CTJ FDR—ONAL NOTES ,ES SHAND T PLABANDONED BE CUT AND PLUMLD Na W N—TER OF RIE%PE. 11 PIPES DE9RIAIED FOR REMOVAL 914l BE COIIPLETEIr RL10WO RSPOSED DE BY ME CON RED 0 OF M AXORDAHU MIM PSMRE" DKREDKE n — —6'C MOWCASEWN UAN 12' T ————— MRRN COR..0 PPE i0 CENTEREWE 6"f $ 9.J6t I. IJ.SEE LANDSCAPE PUNS 30 LF fOR D-DETAIL$ 6• M 'N 7 — 14.POTHOLE UST 12-AN W/Y AT ENTRANCE ON SE IBM ST m / T —I WTERSECWW PREPARE CONNECDON PLAN.PROFILE. L L I AND DET.LS SECURE MYt // E S \ 1 4 ^� .�.. ��•�• �'•�,• ��'•• APPROVAL C DTY OF REDMONDµ1D PDPY WYER 6 e — DE51(N GRDU, —EASEMENT o STARCH EWARW lY ME HYDRANT(EH) 1-9.8T BAG(= o EIRE DEPT MO0 AHEMCONNECRCN(EDC) 1 ® WATER PETER 8 GATE VALW WATER AND SEWER PLAN SCALE:1'=JO I g A-NNNNAA 00045-C4 � m I � I L Z oY N� Q -- W2 Z ¢baa Zx N 2' 1�zz m3 p $ mZ Q0Q + Ix iar f Z — Z, �Z p 1 W I aNy � MiAItE/2 SEE OEJDH A �_, F _ 9 Et ax m E1 119.5 U /I SEE DEJAM.A N TYPE 2 o ME 2 IE 111.5 /J J07 2 /6 tYPE 1 Wiu(E/1 SEE DEW A REEi GAN M EL 119.5 M EL 101.5 a pppp SIRYCNRE K 105.15 M EE 10J.5 RW El 10?5 SNEEi CAN.El 119W z I` b' I I / fP I1PE 2 f 1I?5 C ta.51 IE IOJ.49 K IO2.SJ M M 2 IE 117M n P + OROT SIRUCIIWE IE IOS91 dg ^ MSiALL n1RU5i BLOCIf$ v ___ _ IE0920 ol s yI ' MI PI PO IERT SL ETE%. I \�A JEELI L I ® h1 2 u 9301 S' 'LSF ROCf LEADER IE 8 9 \OD R L 0 2F ST i0 W 'GPE ROOF t£ 'LSE OOD�EADER '� % ROOF lEAI1ER 2 _/ 0 2;RYE 10 0 2S YDPE N W _ 0 2i YOPE TO<P /12 T 2 ppi YPE RW EL 99.10 Y96.10 a V \ i i / OEYGNAB ANM,AL,ttT5 VA LRY 3 —�� PLUYRWG CWJRACRIR MICAL — x 6'SANITARY T*ERCEN LWE 12' gpY n /,/ I CONNECT AT CEN'k M.12' - 6� n0 .& — i0 CEH1EPoUS�6R 59.361 2 gum a / n RPE 2 a ply L RIM EL?2 '" \ o-�o IEl I. 69.BN eR_ IE .76 6Q 12 LEADER i �Y EL 6,E2 F IE 6131 Li 1 A. IT �tN-R.NE — I �iDnLW EWDnW — — _ �' " •`+B$u >(^ ` r I 0 iE I IN69.82 BAN_ 1I \ Eo D OZ O+W AXEAD GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SLAl1:1 =b' PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A-N N N N A A 00015-C3 r RESIDENTIAL ZONE LU N0'S6'IS'E 635.12' - rr-----�-----————————————— —IVL-6CAM SETBACK —————--——————————————————— —————————_---- l 15'REAR TARO SETBACK I 11 J �____" � •� avi II � I g FZraMW.wrLL - y F1 PAR<ING LEVEL - l9 STALLS -► . � i Z II I I nxr• _ ° I Q �. .�------------------------- w_ �- z Z i ————————————————————————— ° W Z H N0'5618"E 635.24' COMMERCIAL ZONE NOTE: THIS TREE PLAN ONLY ILLUSTRATES THE EXISTING TREES THAT WILL BE AFFECTED 5Y NEW CONSTRUCTION, AND ARE SLATED FOR REMOVAL. -- /1EXISTING TREE PLAN 1 -2V-0 L2 I r I mai ii_n_.ii iif ii II iii I!II!II[IIIII I: 11Gi■�.._ 1■tllr■rl IwIIIIIICGItlI■6 I!!m! FoRIIF!!!Illl!Il!I l!II!II!II�!�R�II�I+ _ �. 19111�II!11i1�!�111111!II!I 1!II!Il�llleeelle��ll�I!II!I ' .1 - AtlNWllll �� tlIINNtlNN • �I • — ..—'..—.." i wi'iaaai'!#11##1"uaai iaaai'iaaai'i#11#11"uan iii 1 1 . ;, sl1n�� HI 1 .If_II-- N---II 11•----II-- N --N .IL{I1 ..• iii iaiii iiGi■ii iiiii■ 11111 iisiii'n■rur 11111 iii ■ ■ Gill ilii iii ■ n.■. ■ r ■_.■s■ r r r r r r ■■■r■■; r r •r• ■ ;i 11,I h---•ll_-__!i1111 it _.i! IL_ __li.__ ii h II II- II--�u_u.i m ■ m__m_�_Im � ml_■_m._ m_�_m n n I__._ i i 111�1���1 111 11l�1 1��11 11111 11111 11111 111 919■■ ii it i 111 11111 1111111,11111.11111,11111 1111 11111 111'I!II!Is N p II II .-�" -- _ --- 1111-„ •1111 •1111 - N dl�1111ko . 1111111111111111111111111111111111I'p111111u111u!�11 1IIN11111111N!11111 �1"11111111114!1�mp1���11111111111!I -- •---. ._ . 1111• ----• ----•ry1111- --- p--- .,........�aww —;: .. nwiiirp iwwwl' 'iw�air.,N iaa+aai.. li_I_II—II—II—II—II—II—II—II�I_i�� I_1e11—II'� — — — — — ——i■■� �� ;a11111� s s d!i!u!���!Ilul�lldlp!���!u!���!Ilm�lnu!���!II!i!h!II!I!!rle�Ill1Illl!!i!�lRi1!Ilmm! _. . .LLLI■LLI■I'I'I PIPII11gp111glnnnql!�!!l1111111111111111!nm!II!ii111111111111!I 1 II IP111111111jjmnnl�!111111!!!!!111111111m1m11!!!!!II!!!1191!I _ .. _.. .. _....�.1�1� w�u�u�e•1..��iai..�...-...-.�i�u..nli�wn�.-,.....�.ar��.�n�n�l.��I�tl:�,.... ■ 1111 1 ■ ■■■1 ■■■1 ■ 111■ u11■1111'll'11 ■■11 ■■■1 ■■■In1MII■or MEMO. ■ mart ural ■on = ■■ ■o1i11urI1ull1 ''''r� 1 1 1■ t1 11111 1■I 11111 11111 11111 11�I1 1111 1 I 1 1111111 1 I I i 1111 11111 11111 11111 11111 I■1 11111 11111 111 1 __.IL__ II II.ILI _ '�►�'ia "ear CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMIT LINE , 1 ——————————————————— �������������� 634750 � I I I Ii 15'LAND5CAPE 5ET54CK Ii I I I I' m ul 1 f be- �- -a _LL1r- �-- r---L�1L__LL1L__0_�L11- �_I ������i1���L���I_L11 -------- I III, -------- 1--I-----�-- I ---------------------------- _ I -ECK �. I I II ------------------------ Ilo I I � 2) jos No o __ I I Lf Z—J L———J r-----i I I I f I i 8411LDMG 5-PI P I U I DdW i(7 P4 I Iem91 8F 36 PAWING BT 8 I ITTF[ I _ I 1 _ .. ___ _ _ `/j 1 '_,- J 9 Q -_—__�\ 1 a --------------------- LU CL - Q ss I I ------- - -------- `--------- _ l' 6!4.70 W I Iii JN3 � N BUILDING B - P4 FAR<NG FET i ,4-2.(o 4 1 CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMIT LINE I I I I I ' 634.150' r r r r r L T r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r —r--r r —r r— II _---- __ ------ -------- -------------- __ __ ______________________.__ III I _________________________- -15'L4ND5C4PE 5E75GCK II 'I II I II n' I z, II � II n I I' I -- a rnn 1 it 1----LL1-_I_`LiL_I_0_LL1-_-LL1i ---------'may---�--- --� I I I = JII I ___________________________ 1 I ---� — i----'r — Wil, 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I - I CORRIDOR CORRIDOR ll -- I ° a 'T .BUILDING B WING I RENBLE SF: 4581 OFFICE CROUND FLOOR ' 651 SF BUILDING B lUINC 2 I ACC SSO Y USIN SS ST E R B E ORACxE 15T FLOOR 12,400 SF RENTABLE SF: 9,253 SF PS PARKING LEVEL - 22 STALLS I 63a i50 w � m S �I 5UILDING B - GROUND FLOOR LEVEL Q �� I v P=20'-O" .EE. i I A-2.5 ti CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMIT LINE I , 634.750' fi------L' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,— I; -------- -- --- --------- -- - - --- -- -- -- -- -- --- - - -- - - - - - - - -- — - -- -� Ii 15'LANDSCAPE 5ETBACK 1 I. 1 1� o; li n' I1 Ilii r I � I' — — — — -- F I r o n r J I 36LL Lova I ► I I m BUILDING A } 1 z F3 PARKING LEVEL - 131 STALLS I oea I _- 58 51 SF BUILDING B SEBUILDING B UJING 2COND FLOOR 6,195 SF/RENTABLE SF: 4,581 6 �u u \I STORAG=E ..� OFFICE � � � w —1 -- SS ; 2ND FLOOR 12,(482 SF/RENTABLE SF: 9,253 SF O Y B _ I ,1 1 Q ---- e N �� __ _ _ _. a ,.. r._ _. L-- LU --i------------ 63G750' ' , 11J Q Q BUILDING A — P3 GARAGE LEVEL/ 0N BUILDINCz B 2ND FLOOR —E. � l A-2.4 ' N W RESIDENTIAL ZONE N0'S7 7E ,3517 - - - * ----------__ ---_----_ -_-_-_ - 15'REAR YARD SETBACK !. 1 I II NN I II II A� I II nn I i Lmira OF coNarrmcnoN m� -. F` PAR<NGS LEVEL 19 STALLS ► w � o - I N I N I Iw 0 I I t BUILDINGS A , WINGS I BUILDINGS A , WINCE 2 �1-3 15T FLOOR - 20,469 SF IST FLOOR - 21, 633 SFLH f Z RENTABLE SF: 11,098 RENTABLE SF: 18,063 — 23!1 a5-0' 7351-0` I I I BUILDING= B, DING I235.m I --- -► BUILDINGS B, IUINGS 2 Q ROO ROOF SNOUJN n ', 735•-0m ' ff EM LLLLJ `SS P4 J —r �► y N m� r LU 3 COMMERCIAL ZONE J cl BUILDING= A - IST FOOLR PLAN N1°=201-0° =EE I A-2.1 N Z € W FREBIDENTIAL ZONE kz V—t _— ——__ _ ___— —_——— _—_—15'RE TBAGK 63512— I II I II �N 1 I II n� II ny [ LmITs OF GONSTRCTION J 36 ec km kn a '- FIPARKINCs LEVEL - l9 STALLS 32 5 — 1 I I � I 1 F- ro] � w Ilw � l — BUILDING A , WING 1 ^ ea BUILDING A ,UJING 2 MP3 I U1 IN 2ND FLOOR - 21,284 SF 2ND FLOOR - 21,284 SF ► } ' z I RENTABLE SF: 18,090 RENTABLE SF: 18,096 I I Q ------ BUILDING B, WING 2 BUILDING B, WING 1 I ROOF SHOUINA 26 a o ROOF SHOWN I 0. LL m ffm Lu O w. f Z u N W V'1l'S6 b c '035 t4 w a a GOI'R'1ERGIAL ZONE in Z Oz "J BUILDINCz A - 2ND FLOOR PLANol"=20'-O" A-2.2 i. CITY OF RENTON N DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Howard Seelig,Seelig Family Properties PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street.According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 6. This project shall be subject to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 1. 7. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, estimated at 1,037 trips. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CID SE 64th St St SE i s s i i i _ . CYD lzy St. _.. ..._..._ i .._.. __...__. �t f � t C',2 : t a C[{ 3 r 5 I 5 �� s r p, a ' 4 {�1 TON r ` ............. z f SE 72nd St. S 1 � R-8 a NE 50th St y i f fjjfjj 131�� lf�f�• £ f s' CA NE 48 4 SE 76thSt f_.. SE 376th Pl.' SE 077th Pl. _._J � �� 77th CA .� __ •.YI/ i SE 80th St. Cg 43rd. IL C4 • 32 T24N ME E 1/2 °OB4ff' ZONING —"'——' Renton City t�td 1:4e00 IMW C"''UR`I 29 T24N ME E 1/2 5429 BONING MAP BOCK 93 455 74 92 ' �� � �� ��� .456 459 ± B9 "B c, ,B 6 - B1 f. _ 26 T24N R4E 25 T2�kl`R4E _3 v'T 4N E " °" 2 9 T2�RI R6 *,T24N R5E ,7,,'T N R5F-,- 26 T24N 1 94W"' , 455W 4157" ! 458 ala 464 C C2 ' C3 _ C4 Cp C6, 7 35 T24N R4�;. 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E 3ZT24N Me 3 N 1� �71R6E. 35 T¢4N R5E ` e �3f�6 �� 307 -RW8 8 4 D 3 4` f- 2`T23NR,4E =1 2hf3A1r ?'�zT23NR5E T23N RSE 4T23N1t¢E �47 T23N R5 2 T23N R5E � 11 319 $06 � x � - 1 , T N Ft4 12 T231��t4E T3 "' 23N RSE $03N R5E r '. 9 T23N RSEg" 10123N Rte11 N R5E < a. 326 . 27 • , ` 37 _ i 4 5 7 1 T23N :� rl, i ;:.,: 3 T2$N 424E 18 T23N Rr�E T23 E 16 T23�J R5E''. 1�,T23N R5E 23N R5E 1- 34 ',\335 ' ` `,\335 336• °337 �. 371 ` 815 G1 Get b,7 Gx _ Gti 3 T23N R4Ea. , .. 14 T23N R4E 19 T23Ff.R5E 20':S23N R5E, ?f T23Nt'v ! '_: 22 T23N�25E;:: 23 T23N R5E 44 821 600 �p1 602 &20 t G H H �¢ T23N R4E 2 23f{1 R4E0 T23N R5 29 N 5E +�&T23N�Z6E 27 T 23N ME 6T21M13 '{ ` 25 50 X51 31' 4 60� t 825 8 12 11i it I 6 f 3 36 T23N R4E'. ' 1 T23{�R5E - 32 Ti641 5E ; 33 T23N R* T23N 25E 35 T23N RSE 36 6Q7 608 60�, f 1 Q 5 <' 833 . .1 � � rexrtann,•ra � . r . J JJ�. . 22N R4E TVN R4F � 8 T22N 5 5 T22N E 7 vo 4 T21 R5E �3 T22N ROE 2 T22N R5E . 1 T2 RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTER INDUSTRIAL RC Resource Conservation cv Center Village tH Industrial - Heavy R-1 Residential I du/ac PEW] Urban Center - North 1 IR Industrial - Medium R-4 Residential 4 du/ac llc Urban Center - North 2 IL Industrial - Light R-B Residential 8 du/ac EI Center Downtown* CP) Publicly owned RRH Residential Manufactured Homes GOR Commercial/Office/Residential R-]0 Residential 10 du/ac COMMERCIAL -----Renton City Limits R-la Residential 14 du/ac eA Commercial Arterial• -'-'--Adjacent City Limits RM-F Residential Multi-Family co Commercial Office• Book Pages Boundary RM-T Residential Multi-Family Traditional eN Commercial Neighborhood KROLL PAGE R -tl Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix PAGE# INDEX maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts, please see RMC 4-3. SECTROWN,RANnE Panted by Print 8 Mail Svcs,City of Renton LONING MAP B0,jK1 92 93 4 a 455 E b �;' 56 459 � 461 , v B4.�� B6 4 26 T24N R4E 25 T2 R4E _. 30 Y24N \ k35E �9 T241V R5 2li 124N R5ET24P1,R56 ' 94W -, 26 T24N F15E , 45W X57, 458 4�®. . 464 j C2 C3 / 4 _ 35 r24NiR46,. 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E 32 T24N'R5E ;a. 4►P R ' 306 I I 307 $ 35 fj24N R5E V i..u;Ew x - \� 1309 D3 kD4 ` � 'r23NR5E 4 T23Nf25E ` t & 3•T23N R5 2 T23N R5E \ r. 81 31 3119 ,fig _8 I �. 2 , .g ` 7 T N R4 f2 TZ3N,1E T23N FIE $!f231d R5E! 9.'.T23N RSEi 1 Jc- 10 123N R� -4.4w N R5E/ 1 i r ' 326 27 `�' $ 370 81( , 8;�'I 4 T23N.R4r :• 3;33fd R4E 18 T231J R E� 1 X T23N R5E 16 T23�7 R5E 1 .T2i f�5f 4 23N ',335 X36 X37 I `s 371 ` 81\5 a \ A T23N R4E NT2A R4E e / 4 / 19 7238 R5E ! 26:T23N 151 2;T T3TvE:J 22 T23N R5E ;;r 23 T23N R5E 2 600!'.''. 6D1 I 602 a 821 r: T23N R4E 2 23�I R4E 30 T23N RASE° t ,29 N RSE 28 723N f5E=• 27 T2311 RSE 26 T^ l R5� 25 51L_` 825 2 3m F �+ $: 8 f 4!p ■/ i .., r�6Y., fl Y'T■ i 3 36 T23N R4E" J. 1 T23N R5E • ,3? 23�J 125E 33 T23N Ri1E ' T23N R5E - 36 6 6081 609 610 632 833 35 T23N 5E l t:: rnansmuxe � I 22N R4E 2N ME € [ 4 `:5E 3 T R 6 T221V F 5E,,- 5 T22N R5E R 22N R5E 2 T22N R5E 1 T2 RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTER INDUSTRIAL RC Resource Conservation cv Center Village Ix Industrial - Heavy R-I Residential 1 du/ac UC-Nt Urban Center - North I IR Industrial - Medium R-4 Residential 4 du/ac UC-WZ Urban Center - North 2 It. Industrial - Light R-e Residential 8 du/ac CD Center Downtorm• RMH Residential Manufactured Homes COR Commercial/Office/Residential (P) Publicly owned B R-10 Residential 10 du/ac COMMERCIAL ----Renton City Limits R-14 Residential 14 du/ac ca Commercial Arterial- ---Adjacent City limits Rn-F Residential Multi-Family CO Commercial Office- -Book Pages Boundary FEET Residential Multi-Family Traditional CN Commercial Neighborhood KROLL PAGE 11-U Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix PAGE# INDEX maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts, please see RMC 4-3. SECnrovrt+IwwcE Printed by Print 8 Mail Svcs,City of Renton William Popp Associates Transportation Engineers/Planners (425)401-1030 FAX(425)401-2125 e-mail: info@wmpoppassoc.com February 1, 2006 To: Jill Ding Associate Planner City of Renton c/o: Howard Seelig Seelig Family Properties From: William Popp, Jr. William Popp Associates Senior Transportation Engineer Subject: Kennydale Business Park Development Re: Site Access Sight Distance Analysis; Supplemental to the Traffic Impact Analysis dated June 11, 2004 In response to the City's request to Carl Pirscher, Pirscher Architects, dated January 28, 2006, this memorandum summarizes the sight distance at the two proposed site access points to NE 48th St. Included herein is a discussion of the existing features of NE 48th St, the proposed site access locations, and the available and minimum required stopping and intersection sight distance at each of the site access locations. Roadway and Site Access Inventory NE 48th St is a two-way east/west residential street that connects from Lake Washington Boulevard NE in the City of Renton to 116th Ave SE in the City of Newcastle. The roadway grade fronting the site is approximately 18% sloping down from the east to the west. The roadway is relatively level east of 113th Ave NE. The posted speed limit is 25 mph, however, in the westbound direction near the 113th Ave NE intersection there is a downhill grade warning sign accommodated with a recommended 20 mph speed sign. We conducted a pilot car speed study in the westbound direction for five vehicles (light traffic) and determined the vehicle speeds ranged between 25 mph and 30 mph. 14-400 Building. Suite 206 . 14400 Bel-Red Road 9 Bellevue, WA 98007 `40W Ifto Jill M. Ding Associate Planner, Citv of Renton Kennydale Business Park Development Sight Distance Evaluation Pa<,e 2 February 1. 2006 Therefore, based on the speed warning sign and the observed speed of traffic in the westbound direction, it is concluded that the an appropriate design speed would be 30 mph. While not measured, it is likely that the traffic speed in the eastbound driection due to the steeep upgrade is considerably less. But for consistency with design practice only a single design speed is used. NE 48`h St varies in geometry along the site frontage. The west site access, which is located approximately 21 feet from the west property line (property line to center of driveway), accesses to a 3-lane 36' wide section that includes a center two-way left turn lane. The east site access, which is located approximately 215 feet from the west property line (property line to center of driveway), accesses to a 2-lane 24' wide section. The driveway locations and roadway features are shown in Attachment 1. Sight Distance Standards A sight distance analysis for both the Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and the Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) was evaluated at each of the project access points. The SSD is the distance needed for a vehicle traveling at design speed on the major road to stop before reaching a stationary 2' high object in its' path(equivalent to the taillight height of a passenger car). This criteria of course applies continuously along the roadway and the measured SSD generally indicates the design speed of the roadway. The minimum acceptable values for stopping sight distance are shown in Table 1. These values are the national standards from "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" 2001, published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). In computing and measuring stopping sight distance, the height of the driver's eye is assumed to be 3.5 ft and the height of the object to be seen by the driver is 2.0 ft. The other sight distance considered is Intersection Sight Distance. ISD is based on an entering vehicle eye height of 3.5 feet, and an approaching vehicle height of 4.25 feet. The setback distance was assumed to be 10 feet back from edge of traveled way. ISD deals with the ability of side street entering, and mainline left-turning, motorists to see oncoming vehicles with sufficient time to make entering, crossing, or exiting maneuvers without significantly impeding the speed of the mainline traffic or creating hazardous conflict conditions. Intersection sight distance thresholds are highest for the condition that allows a vehicle to enter the major street and attain 85 percent of the design speed before being overtaken by an approaching vehicle. As a result, the intersection sight William Popp Associates I*MW Jill M. Ding Associate Planner, City of Renton Kennydale Business Park Development Sight Distance Evaluation Page 3 February 1,2006 distance for this condition relates more to driver comfort and roadway capacity rather than safety. Table 1 Sight Distance Requirements Design Speed SSD(ft)b ISD(ft) (mph) Westbound Eastbound Left Out' Right Out d 20 153 99 221 191 25 216 131 276 239 30 289 167 331 287 Per 2001 AASHTO b Calculated values(not rounded)with adjustments for grade;+18%eastbound.-18%westbound. Calculated values(not rounded)for left tum out,no multi lane adjustment required for crossing single lane westbound traffic. d Calculated values(not rounded)for right turn out(looking west). Assuming a design speed of 30 mph in both directions, the minimum stopping sight distance requirement based on an+18% grade eastbound and—18% grade westbound (both approaching the site access) is 167 feet in the eastbound direction and 289 feet in the westbound direction. For the intersection sight distance, the minimum based on 30 mph design speed is 331 feet for a left turn out and 287 feet for right turn out. Grade on the mainline is not a factor for ISD since both vehicles are traversing the same grade. West Site Driveway Sight Distance The available SSD for a vehicle approaching from the east and viewing an object in the roadway in the vicinity of this site access is estimated to be approximately 520 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade). The SSD is limited by the vertical curve at the 111th Ave NE intersection. The required minimam SSD based on a 30 mph design speed and a grade of—18%is 289 feet thus the available SSD is adequate. The available SSD for a vehicle approaching from the west is approximately 445 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade), is viewed along a sag vertical curve, and is only limited due to the tee-intersection at Lake Washington Boulevard NE. The required minimum SSD based on a 30 mph design speed and a grade of+18% is 167 feet thus the available SSD is adequate The ISD for a vehicle exiting the site looking east is estimated to be approximately 985 feet.. The available sight distance extends to 113th Ave SE, through the vertical curve at William Popp Associates Jill M. Ding Associate Planner, City of Renton Kennydale Business Park Development Sight Distance Evaluation Page 4 February 1, 2006 the 11 lth Ave SE intersection. The required minimum ISD based on a 30 mph design speed is 331 feet thus the available ISD is adequate. It is important to note there is a center two-way left turn lane which would allow vehicles exiting the site to store before entering the westbound thru lane. The ISD for a vehicle exiting the site looking west turning right is approximately 445 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade), is viewed along a sag vertical curve, and is only limited due to the tee-intersection at Lake Washington Boulevard NE. The required minimum ISD based on a 30 mph design speed is 331 feet thus the available ISD is adequate. The SSD and ISD evaluation(to the east) is shown in Attachment 2. East Driveway Access Sight Distance The available SSD for a vehicle approaching from the east and viewing an object in the roadway in the vicinity of this site access is estimated to be approximately 290 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade). The SSD is limited by the vertical curve at the 11 lth Ave NE intersection. The required minimum SSD based on a 30 mph design speed and a grade of—18% is 289 feet thus the available SSD is adequate. The available SSD for a vehicle approaching from the west is approximately 645 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade), is viewed along a sag vertical curve, and is only limited due to the tee-intersection at Lake Washington Boulevard NE. The required minimum SSD based on a 30 mph design speed and a grade of+18% is 167 feet thus the available SSD is adequate The available ISD for a vehicle exiting the site looking east is estimated to be approximately 335 feet. The available sight distance extends to the opposite side of the 11 lth Ave SE intersection. The required minimum ISD based on a 30 mph design speed is 331 feet thus the available ISD is adequate. It should be noted that it is assumed that the driveway design would slope down at a rate of—2% from approximately 2' south of the curb/gutter line back approximately 13 feet(just past the property line)before it steepens into the site parking area. The resultant ISD evaluation assumes the centerline elevation of the driveway at this setback point is between 0.2 and 0.3 feet lower than the centerline of NE 48th St. The available ISD for a vehicle exiting the site looking west turning right is approximately 645 feet (traversed distance accounting for grade), is viewed along a sag William Popp Associates Nme `err Jill M. Ding Associate Planner,City of Renton Kennydale Business Park Development Sight Distance Evaluation Page 5 February 1,2006 vertical curve, and is only limited due to the tee-intersection at Lake Washington Boulevard NE. The required minimum ISD based on a 30 mph design speed is 331 feet thus the available ISD is adequate. The SSD and ISD evaluation (to the east) is shown in Attachment 3. Summary As requested by the City of Renton, an evaluation of sight distance at the site access driveways was conducted. It is concluded that there is more than adequate sight distance (SSD or ISD) at the west site access. At the east site access, there is more than adequate sight distance (SSD or ISD)to the west. The SSD for a vehicle approaching from the east and the ISD for a vehicle turning left viewing to the east is at the minimum thresholds based on the 2001 AASHTO standards. Nevertheless, the sight distance is still classed as meeting standards. Please contact me at(425) 401-2124 or bpoppir@wmpoppassoc.com if you have any questions. Thank you. William Popp Associates Now Jill M. Ding Associate Planner, City of Renton Kennydale Business Park Development Sight Distance Evaluation Page 5 February 1, 2006 vertical curve, and is only limited due to the tee-intersection at Lake Washington Boulevard NE. The required minimum ISD based on a 30 mph design speed is 331 feet thus the available ISD is adequate. The SSD and ISD evaluation (to the east) is shown in Attachment 3. Summary As requested by the City of Renton, an evaluation of sight distance at the site access driveways was conducted. It is concluded that there is generous sight distance (SSD or ISD) at the west site access. At the east site access, there is generous sight distance (SSD or ISD) to the west. The SSD for a vehicle approaching from the east and the ISD for a vehicle turning left looking to the east is at the minimum thresholds based on the 2001 AASHTO standards. Nevertheless, the sight distance is still classed as meeting standards. Please contact me at (425)401-2124 or bpoppjr@wmpoppassoc.com if you have any questions. Thank you. William Popp Associates 1 C UD r 1 Oil U) il 4 1.1;2' �ntering Sight Distance F- - , U) Z d EAST SITE ACCESS - - - cm 2 , N s11 I y (mmI; 1 m 7 C APTS DVWY of SITE IL li O 18, , I '12,'' I 1 III I ' 1 I I III I I h , 9 9 Enterin Sight Distance II I I III � 1N WEST SITE ACCESS I - - 1 II 1 1 I I 1 III I I 1 _ 1 1 m C. GRAPHIC SCALE m 0 25 50 100 1 1 d: IY1�1 0 I n ATTACHMENT 1 s , V ehicle height(4.25'y'center of road ISDN - ---- -- 1 -. avai able to 11th Ave i I I i I I � ; i eye height(1.5')center of road(SSD) 1 ' 17a- 1 , 1 511' j -_170 _- 1 I - Stopping Sight Distance(horizontal distance) 1 I I I __-1_5.x_ j I ! I I I I •'1 1 145 1 526" �• 40 I .�I ,,,,�CI,,,,♦ ' � � I � 13.5 -13.R.-_- 1 Z Z .I ! W.125 1 , Z 4.i O I I : j W W �l! r� r (A1 ' Lu- I I 1 i 95 U) - NE 48th St(centerline profile) 1 I 1 1 �' eye height(3.5')IIon derive a ISD I i I y( ) - object!hei ht 2.0' center bf road SSD 1 —SQ____, 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I _ i I -- 111=20' H N E 48th St �/ i I i I i I I I I j 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 WEST DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE EVALUATION ATTACHMENT 2 • ',,�,, I I I I I I ! I { 90 _ I ! I , 200 , vghicle hei�ht(41,25')cent r of road ISD,-- i I i I I eye Iheig t(3.5')center of ro d(SSD) ! i I `.I 40 170 ' ' 286' I#t I I I I i I � I I I I I I m• c � p I I I I I I I ! I I I , I NI u' ! ' w 60'I 1 eyejheig�t(3.�')on driv�wayl(ISO) z{ j 12 �';t' ; object height(2.0')Icentbr of road 1(SSD) I— a. , i W , ! li W{ , 1 n.4 W' U){ ! , QLul ' I W H -- t E 48 h�t(centerline pro le)vj go 15- 1 { , I ILu I ! ! I ' i326i , , I r I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! 1"=20' H NE 48th St ! ! 1"=5'V � I I I � I I ! I II II ! I I I f ! I I ! I I I I I ! I ! ! I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I 1 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 EAST DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE EVALUATION ATTACHMENT 3 Y o� CITY Gam' RENTON �s ♦ ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator INT January 19, 2006 Carl F. Pirscher, AIA CDA &Pirscher Architects, Inc. 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO Box 55429 Shoreline, WA 98155 SUBJECT: EXCEPTION THROUGH MODIFICATION TO PROTECTED SLOPES FOR KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK, LUA-05-114 Dear Mr. Pirscher: I am in receipt of your letter requesting consideration and approval of modifications to allow development on protected slopes for Kennydale Business Park project located in the 1900 block of NE 48th Street. The proposal is for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. Surface parking and a portion of the drive aisle is proposed in the protected slope area requested for modification. The Renton Municipal Code Section 4-3-050J.5 for Protected Slopes provide for Exceptions through Modification. The applicant maintains the protected slope area in question was created due to a private road installation or widening The Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4-3-050N.2.ii set forth the following procedure to assess the modification request: 1. The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report describing any potential impacts of the proposed regarding and any necessary mitigation measures; 2. All submitted reports shall be independently reviewed by qualified specialists selected by the City at the applicant's expense; 3. The Department Administrator may grant, condition, or deny the request based upon the proposal's compliance with the applicable modification criteria of RMC 4-9-250D; 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AM%, AHFAD OF THF CTTRVF 4. Any slope which remains forty percent (40%) or steeper following site development shall be subject to all applicable geologic hazard regulations for steep slopes and landslide hazards, in this section;and 5. In addition to the criteria of RMC 4-9-250D, Modification Procedures, the following criteria shall apply; The proposed modification is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250 F are followed. The applicant provided a geotechnical report from GEO Group Northwest,Inc. dated November 14, 2005 and supplement information to support the modification request. The report concludes that the slopes located on the subject site were created as a result of resource extraction activities (logging)and the associated road building that occurred on the subject site. Fill and grading activities that resulted in up to 7 feet of fill being placed on some portions of the subject site as the result of the road construction has occurred in the past. Based on staff's analysis, it has been;determined the applicant request for modification of the steep slope, as defined by the parameters of the Renton Municipal.Code is acceptable. Therefore, the proposed modification to after the protected slope (slope with a 40% of greater grade)is approved. This determination will be final unless`a written appeal of`;this administrative determination—accompanied by t116*`o red$75,.00 filing fee:-is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of,this decision. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Jill Ding at(425) 430-7219. Sincerely, is Greg Zimmerm Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Cc: File Jennifer Henning Neil Watts Jill Ding Owner Parties of record 44 a 7 r r � 9 l # J� AM 8'�- Yjj� o".r• '�� �� - •�ur�!�jiocr •u,,.o�y��.� [/�/ I�I I ' 9 �/� - ,. ♦ .'r!� II�gIG:.������yilli, - .. �.... �//////b'IY�Y/i� III �� 4 f6�i i_ � YJ�3r�/I//%i�iy 4/ice •./� �r ` r ' , 1 �.1���6��'ya��z. �rAlflr78T �r/� ��y �I�a ���/���//l_��+y�ii Myr■..:�� ,��,�pp �j�ii" ; I I �I� ,. ,���� ����►".�7•��'-`"■.•`� �r//J�����-.�=:�Y l IliI��IJiI�!11�i1 MR ��\��TWYO �•1�-" i� PGy= �i„w 1'1111 X11 ,dig !" a ��.'>JOQ1� 'a�cc.� r� - �Ii11111J!�I��®IIiII qNO �� - _ _ _ - n . �`��_�� -•• mac' `� _ 1 .;,n11111i1 U!.Iflllll IIU!!; ��=� I CDA 1 � i Uti I o� CITY (,,,F RENTON ♦ ♦ PlanningMuilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 18,2006 Carl F. Pirscher Pirscher Architects PO Box 55429 Shoreline, WA 98155 RE: Kennydale Business Park (Renton File Number LUA05-114) Dear Mr. Pirscher; This letter is a follow up to the voicemail I left you today regarding the status of the Kennydale Business Park. The City has concerns with regards to site distance on NE 48"' Street for the two access driveways entering the proposed office park. Please provide a site distance analysis on NE 48`h Street for the two proposed access driveways prior to Friday, February 3`d, 2006. In addition, the Kennydale Business Park is being taken off hold and is tentatively scheduled to go to the Hearing Examiner on February 14, 2006. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (425)430-7219. Sincerely, y Jill K. Ding Associate Planner cc: owner parties of record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N ®Thisa er contains 50%r AHEAD OF THE CURVE. p p recycled material,30%postconsumer Y o� � CITY CJ RENTON ♦ A ♦ PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 18, 2006 Susan Irwin 7701 111''Place SE Newcastle, WA 98056 RE: Your Comments Regarding the Kennydale Business Park (Renton File No. LUA05-114) Dear Ms. Irwin; Thank you for your comments dated December 1, 2005 regarding the Kennydale Business Park. You have been made a party of record and your comments have been added to the official file. The decision maker will consider your comments when rendering a decision on the project. Your concerns focused primarily on traffic, critical areas, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The following is a response to your comments. Your first concern was with regards to traffic, specifically sight distance on NE 48th Street (SE 76th Street). This City's Transportation Division has reviewed the project application and has requested a sight distance analysis be conducted by the applicant. The results of the sight distance analysis may result in a redesign of the Kennydale Business Park site plan. Your second concern was with regards to the steep slopes located on the subject site. Within the City of Renton slopes with a grade that exceeds 40% for a vertical height of 15 feet are classified as Protected Slopes and development is prohibited on such slopes. An Exception through Modification of such slopes may be granted in some instances where the applicant can demonstrate that the slopes were created as a result of human activities (i.e. road construction and resource extraction) and the slopes may be regarded. The applicant submitted a slope analysis and a Protected Slope was identified on the site plan. The applicant has subsequently requested an Exception through Modification to regrade the Protected Slope areas based on information showing that the slopes has been created as a result of past logging activities. The City is currently reviewing the Exception through Modification request. If granted a 14 day appeal period will follow and you may appeal the Exception through Modification. Your third concern was with regard to the incompatibility of the proposed development with the existing neighborhood. The subject property is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%postconsumer on the City's zoning map, as such the project will be required to comply with the regulations governing development in the CA zone. If you have further questions regarding this application, feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, JRII�K. Ding, Associate anner Project Manager � °rrr► MEMORANDUM ' Lop' 0 O 11 � DATE: December 1, 2005 DEC - r' TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner „th Nancy Weil, Senior Planner FROM: Susan Irwin 41, 7701 111th Place S.E., Newcastle, Washington 98056 RE: Application for Kennydale Business Park, LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize reasons why the above-referenced application should be denied. 1) Public health/safety/welfare concerns; The application indicates that two driveways will provide ingress and egress to SE 76th (also referenced as "NE 48th,,). The proposal also states that 200 employees are expected on the site, with no specification as to the number of potential customers. In the area in question, SE 76th is a two lane road with very limited sight distance. The road design will not safely allow for the proposed traffic increase. Vehicles entering onto SE 76th from 111th Place SE can only see the bottom of the hill (Lake Washington Blvd.) to approximately one-half block east; beyond that visibility is hindered due to the steep nature of the road. Vehicles entering or exiting the proposed development would not be visible from 111th Place. Consequently, if the application were to be approved as proposed, it would result in on-going collisions. Vehicles will turn on to SE 76th into the path of oncoming vehicles because they will be unable to see the approaching vehicles until it is too late to avoid a collision. The City of Renton should be concerned on two grounds a) the proposed application, when considered in terms of existing road design, will endanger the health/safety/welfare of people traveling on SE 76th, and b) if the City approves this application, with prior knowledge of the poor road design/limited sight distance, it is opening itself to a barrage of claims for any collision resulting thereafter. Because of the road design, and its steep grade, this is not a situation that can be resolved with some type of mitigation. 2) Critical Area location— Steep slopes: The site for the proposed development is a critical area; the slopes are very steep and subject to slides and erosion. It should be noted that the City of Newcastle denied an application for development of property just to the north of this site due to the steep slopes and known slide tendency. The `err' records are available from the City of Newcastle for Renton's review and consideration. 3) Incompatibility with adjacent uses: The proposed design does not conform to the existing surroundings. While the property is zoned for commercial use, it is surrounded on three sides by residential property. It should be noted that this is the sole undeveloped tract of commercially zoned property remaining in the area. Accordingly, it is imperative that any development be done in a manner that is consistent with the existing commercial development. Those properties which adjoin the western part of the tract in issue, are all one or two-story buildings whose square footage is nowhere near the size of the building proposed in the application in question(4 stories; 209,468 square feet). Aesthetically, it will not blend in with current development in the area(it would be as an elephant among antelope). Further, the height of the proposed buildings will negatively impact the residential view properties immediately to the east of the development. Also, as mentioned previously, the location of driveways, and expected traffic volume, are incompatible with the roadway design and its current use by existing homeowners in the area. Y o CITY CoF RENTON ♦ ♦ PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department bA KathyKeolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 18, 2006 Emily Rollins 7617 111th Place SE Newcastle, WA 98056 RE: Your Comment Letter Regarding the Kennydale Business Park Renton File No. LUA05-114 Dear Ms. Rollins; Thank you for your comment letter dated October 24, 2005 regarding the Kennydale Business Park. Your comments have been added to the official file and you have been made a party of record. The decision maker will consider your comments when rendering a decision on the project. In your letter you listed 3 concerns regarding traffic on NE 48th Street, the intersection of NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Blvd, and the potential for an increase in noise from the parking garage. The following is a response to:your comments: Your first concern is with regard to traffic safety on NE 48th Street from which the project proposed to take its access. A traffic study was submitted with the project application and the City's Transportation Division has reviewed the study and has concerns with regards to sight distance for vehicles entering and exiting the proposed project site. A sight distance analysis has been requested and may result in a redesign of the proposed site plan. Your second concern is with regards to the safety of the intersection of NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Blvd. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is planning improvements on that intersection. To inquire regarding the timing of those projects, please contact WSDOT at GantsC@wsdot.wa.gov. Your third concern was with regards to the increased traffic noise and view impacts associated with the construction of a two story parking garage. The property is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The CA zone permits a maximum height of 50 feet, with which the project will be required to comply. The noise impacts from the parking garage would be governed by the City's noise ordinance. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RE N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This papercontains 50%receded material,30%postconsumer Feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219 if you have any additional questions or concerns regarding this project: Sincerely, ill K. Ding V Associate Planner a 1 �r w' "gin►�' BITTY OF RENTON ANG October 24, 2005 OCT 2 6 2005 City of Renton ��� ` 164 ATTN: Nancy Weil �` Fax: 425-430-7300 i To Whom It May Concern: We received the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-significance- mitigated (DNS-M) for the Kennydale Business Park project located at 1900 block of NE 48' St., Land Use Number LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF. My husband and I own the home at 7617 111 th PL SE, Lot 3 in Hemmingson Terrace, which is directly east of the proposed project site. We would like to express a few concerns and have listed them in order of importance: 1) Traffic on NE 48th Street, which is also known as SE 76th-As you are aware, this is a narrow two lane road that has an extremely steep hill. It does not appear reasonable that the only entrance and exit to the business park is off that street. Without widening the street and addition of traffic calming devices, such as speed bumps and/or stop signs, it is difficult to envision the current plan as safe. 2) Traffic on the intersection of NE 44th and Lake Washington Blvd—This intersection has been the terror of the neighborhood for years.. In 2000, 1 reviewed plans that were part of the 1-405 improvements, which included alternatives to increase safety for this area. None of the improvements have been made, and I have personally seen the remains of several accidents at that intersection over the last five years. Adding the traffic volume of the proposed business park tenants only increases our concern for our safety and others. 3) Of secondary concern is the increased traffic noise from the creation of a two-story parking garage and the potential impediment to our current Lake Washington view. We hope the building and parking structures will be built as to respect our peace, privacy, and view. We understand that there is a public hearing scheduled for November 22, 2005. Unfortunately, we had previous plans to be out of town for that period and will not be able to attend. We hope that you will take our concerns into consideration. q ley t� Sincerely, Emily Rollins Rollins, Emily (US - Seattle) From: SEAFAX@deloitte.com Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:46 PM To: Rollins, Emily(US -Seattle) Subject: Your fax has been successfully sent to Whom it may concern at 4254307300. Your fax has been successfully sent to Whom it may concern at 4254307300. ------------------------------------------------------------ From: Emily Rollins ------------------------------------------------------------ Time: 10/24/2005 4 :42 :28 PM Sent to 4254307300 with remote ID Result: (0/339;0/0) Successful Send Page record: 1 - 2 Elapsed time: 02 :28 on channel 1 1 LU&5-i10,101 SO, i ... VAfWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Douglas B. MacDonald P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 206-440-4000 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov January 6, 2005 Nancy Weil -1A li City of Renton Planning Department ' 1055 South Grady Way Y "/ Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Kennydale Business Park(136,766 ft' Multi-Use Commercial) LUA 05-144, SA-H, ECF SR 405 MP 7.47 (NE 44th Street NB Ramps junction) Dear Ms. Weil: We thank you for allowing the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) to comment through SEPA for the above referenced development. We have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis sent to our office and we offer the following comments: 1. The I-405 NB Ramps at NE 44th Street intersection is located at MP 7.47 on I-405. This intersection, which includes 1-405 NB ramps to the south and Lake Washington Boulevard SE to the north, currently ranks 18 out of 313 in the WSDOT Signal Priority Array(SPA) and is also part of a 2006 High Accident Corridor(HAC). As the TIA reports, there are high number of accidents involving NB off-ramp and EB traffic recorded for this intersection. This intersection meets Warrant I of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and based on our analysis, a signal is needed for this intersection. We require participation of the developer in a pro-rata share towards a signalization project to reduce the impacts of the development to this intersection. 2. Based on the description of the development, it seems that ITE Trip Generation Land Use Code 750 that would forecast a higher AWT and peak hour is more proper to be applied for this development. Even using Land Use Code 710 would result in a higher than what was report in Table 4. The AWT based on Land Use Code 710 is about 1,455 trips with AM Peak of 205 trips and PM Peak of 204 trips. 3. The PM peak data was selected for the analysis. However, the project trip generation shows a higher volume during AM Peak. We request a copy of the collected AM peak data to verify the use of PM peak in the analysis. *OW *.r0 January 6, 2005 I-405 (Kennydale Business Park Development) Page 2 4. Considering comments 2 and 3, the 9% impact mentioned on Page I I is lower than the actual project impacts that should be considered for a fair share contribution. If you have any questions, or require additional information please contact Felix Palisoc of our Developer Services section by phone at 206-440-4713, or via e-mail at pal iso:f(a;wsdot.wa.,ov. Sincerely, Ramin Pazooki SnoKing Area Planning Manager RP:fsp cc: Day File Project File D. Sims/R.Roberts,MS 120 CAFe1ix_DevSery\SEPA_Responses\sepaRENTON_1405MP7 KennydaleBusi nessPark_TtAcommentsMty.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher,being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 48th Street. According to the DETERMINATION City's Critical Areas map,the site a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW contains Protected Slopes. circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date COMMITTEE&PUBLIC HEARING Appeals of the environmental of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language RENTON,WASHINGTON determination must be filed in writing P P gThe Environmental Review Com- on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King mittee has issued a Determination of 2005.Appeals must be filed in writing County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- together with the required $75.00 lowing project under the authority of application fee with: Hearing Exam- Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. the Renton Municipal Code. iner, City of Renton, 1055 South The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Kennydale Business Park Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, Kin Count Journal and not in supplement form which was regularly LUA05-114,SA-H,ECF Appeals to the Examiner are governed King Y PP ) g Y Location: 1900 Block of NE 48th by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed Street. The applicant is tion 4-8-110.B.Additional information notice,a requesting Environmental regarding the appeal process may be Review (SEPA) and Hearing obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Public Notice Examiner Site Plan review for Office,(425)430-6510. the construction of two office/ A Public Hearing is tentatively retail buildings with associated scheduled by the Renton Hearing was published on November 7,2005. surface/structure parking and Examiner in the Council Chambers, landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. City Hall, on November 22, 2005 at The proposed Building A is 9:00 AM to consider the Site Pian. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum 84,670 gross square feet two Please contact Project Planner,Nancy of$122.00. %till il)r stories over two levels of parking. Weil at(425)430-7270 if you have any 34 uare questions. If the Environmental ,�'�L B,9���/� Building with Bone lis evel of structure Determination is appealed,the appeal will be vis public Qm��' ` "T y~T•����.� outh section. The is to isng zonedr the Commercial hearing.Inter sted parties as part of are invited ."�. `. Arterial.Access to the site would to attend to public hearing. Tom Meagher > EXE be via two private drives from NE Published in the King County Journal Legal Advertising Representative,King County Journal��i 04/28/2009 t Z November 7,2005.#849901 Subscribed and sworn to me this 7`b day of November,2& s•. r e Oi Jodyko arton Notary Public for the State of Washington,Residing in Auburn,Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. 1 5�1 �L fid,-7vc - c�v •�oo.b � 7V 4VV 0) tA pe� (v7V6, J-V?�Av NON R' CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING November 22, 2005 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s)listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Taylor Court Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-082, SHPL-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of 1.68-acre site into nine lots intended for the eventual development of detached single- family homes. An existing single-family residence is to remain on one of the proposed lots. The lots would range in size from 4,550 sq. ft. to 9,541 sq. ft. The site is located within the Residential- 8 (R-8) zoning designation with a proposed net density of 6.52 du/ac. Access is proposed off of Monterey Place NE via a new public street terminating into a cul de sac. The site does not appear to contain any on-site critical areas however a buffer area from an off-site wetland does run along a portion of west property line. PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park—To be continued PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. A surface parking lot is proposed on the east side of Building A. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. HEX Agenda 11-22-05 ;g CITY RENTON .,n PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department K y Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 15, 2005 To: Owner/Applicant All Parties of Record Subject: Kennydale Business Park LUA 05-114,SA-H,ECF The applicant has requested an Exemption through Modification (RMC 4-3-050J.5.b) for an on-site Protected Slope area and for minor modification to the site plan. Therefore, in order to process these requests,the Public Hearing will be continued. No staff report or presentation will be prepared for this meeting. On the scheduled date of November 22, 2005, the Hearing Examiner will open the meeting and will continue the hearing for the subject application to a future date yet to be determined. If you should wish to attend this meeting, you will be given the opportunity to enter comments into the public record. As Parties of Record you will be notified of the rescheduled Public Hearing date approximately ten days prior to the date. If you have any questions,please contact Nancy Weil, Senior Planner at 425-4320-7270. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 REN T O N SThis paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE NOTmVE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 8r,PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05.114,SA-H,ECF LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48'Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site.The proposed Building A Is 84,870 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking.Building B Is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial.Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map,the site contains Protected Slopes. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21,2005. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8.110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clark's Office,(425)430.8510. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON,WASHINGTON, FOR NOVEMBER 22, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. SITE r � � % f' SEI , ry (pIgk,i 9Ist9 fk we FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for Proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, pen,,k 'joroh , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: D S SIGNED: R ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing in 1 �� on the '7 day of IVB; Zoe' Y NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: Ay tir ofad1r v: ii,,`Ali .. Y CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 3rd day of November, 2005, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Nie nt Agencies See Attached Bryan Borchers Contact G 21 Company/Howard Seelig Owner/Applicant June Huston Party of Record W. Elper Party of Record Ragina Sparks Party of Record John Atzbach Party of Record Emily Rollins Party of Record David J. Scott Party of Record (Signature of Sender): rNOTARYPUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS WASHINGTC;�N COUNTY OF KING ) ,j ; ,t.:sr � 4 ". :"RC1 1 P I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: It(7/0 Notary Public in and for Jthe ,Sate of Washington Notary (Print): r/� S (z My appointment expires: 3 lq&,� ProjectName: Kennydale Business Park { Project Num1 :' LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF template-affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology* WDFW-Stewart Reinbold* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 1601h Ave SE 39015—172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Bellevue,WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region* Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle,WA 98106-1514 39015172 nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn,WA 98092-9763 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp.of Engineers* KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Office of Archaeology&Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S.Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle,WA 98124 Seattle,WA 98104-3855 Olympia,WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor* Depart.of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. &Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom,AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS:XRD-01 W Tukwila,WA 98188 Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle,WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an"Optional DNS",the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's,and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template-affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-114,SA-H,ECF LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site.The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial.Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map,the site contains Protected Slopes. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, FOR NOVEMBER 22, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. 9 �r ) SITE lip' Ar s r WINR 4 I ,Cc. ' N 1�f FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. el CITY RENTON .,u PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 3, 2005 Bryan Borchers CDA Pirscher Architects, Inc. PO Box 55429 Seattle, WA 98155 SUBJECT: Kennydale Business Park LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Borchers: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Section C for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing. Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on November 22, 2005 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, O-z�J4 Nancy Weil Senior Planner cc: G21 Company, Howard Seelig/Owner(s)/Applicant June Huston, W. Elper, Ragina Sparks,John Atzbach, Emily Rollins, David J. Scott/ Party(ies)of Record Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE " CITY CF RENTON RPlanning/BuildingftblicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 3, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on November 1, 2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, �G p"'`�` c� Nancy Weil Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp..of Engineers Stephanie Kramer,Office of Archaeology&Historic Preservation 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RE N T O N This paper 50% AHEAD OF THE CURVE p pe recycled material,30%postconsumer ,%m CITY OF RENTON `"o DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Howard Seelig, Seelig Family Properties PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 7, 2005 DATE OF DECISION: November 1, 2005 SIGNATURES: —I6te, I � Gregg Zim r n, A minis rator Date Lee Wheeler, Kre Chief Date Planning/Building/Public Works Fire Department kk Dennis Culp, A ministrator D to Alex Pie sch, Administrator Date Community Services EDNSP Nw CITY OF RENTON ` oli DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Howard Seelig, Seelig Family Properties PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 6. This project shall be subject to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 1. 7. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, estimated at 1,037 trips. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 .r CITY OF RENTON N"W DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Howard Seelig, Seelig Family Properties PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street.According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planninq 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 GPM. One hydrant is required within 150 ft. of the structures and four (4) additional hydrants are required within 300 ft. of the structure 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 ft. of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-ft. width with a turning radius of 45 ft. outside and 25 ft. inside radius. 4. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous material to be used or stored on site. Building 1. The project shall comply with the recommendations of the soils report and provide site monitoring by the geotechnical engineer. Plan Review—Surface Water/Storm Drainage 1. Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of$0.249 x the new impervious surface area. Estimated fees for surface water is $ 32,506.70 based on an estimated 130,549 square feet of new impervious surface area. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. This project drains to Lake Washington. Due to documented downstream flooding in this area, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual - Level I Flow Control for design of both detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces. A preliminary drainage report has been submitted for review. The report addresses the 1998 KCSWM. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 *#W01 1"W 3. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. The first order of business shall be installation of a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. Plan Review—Water 1. Water System Development Charges (SDC) for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of $0.213 x the square footage of the site. Estimated fees for water is $44,616.68 based on 209,468 sq. feet. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 4,500 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Fire flow calculation is 500 gpm more than what is available. Applicant will need to reduce fire flow demand to meet available fire flow. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Extension of a looped 12-inch water main and installation of new hydrants on site around the building is required. 5. Building exceeds thirty feet in height. A backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. 6. A pressure-reducing valve is required to be installed at the domestic meter. 7. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards.For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building; applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 8. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. Applicant shall provide a Sewer Availability Certificate from Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. Plan Review—Street Improvements 1. Half street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs, and streetlights along the frontage in NE 48th Street are required. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 3. This development shall extend the existing two-way left-turn lane on NE 48th Street (SE 76th Street) to the east to the Renton city limits. The City has concerns with potential conflicts between through traffic on NE 48th St and traffic entering and exiting the two proposed driveways serving the site. Extending the two-way left-turn lane would reduce the potential impacts and allow all movements into and out of the site. 4. A traffic study was submitted as part of the application. However, the TIA does not include discussion of available sight distance on NE 48th St at the two access driveways proposed to serve the site. This information shall be submitted to the Plan Review. In Development Services. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 `4W v Plan Review—General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility; drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 4. Separate permits and fees for water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. 5. APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES. 6. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. ERC Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 %W, +s./ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE November 1 , 2005 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2005 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Defoor Preliminary Plat (Dinq) LUA05-093, PP, ECF The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 6.91-acre site zoned Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 21 lots ranging in size from 5,250 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences. The subject site contains a Class 3 stream, 2 Class 4 streams, a Class 3 wetland, steep slopes,and high coal mine hazard areas. Kennydale Business Park (Weil) LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial.Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer B.Wolters,EDNSP Director J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Engler,Fire Prevention J.Medzegian,Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney *400, City of Renton STAFF Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE November 1, 2005 Project Name: Kennydale Business Park Owner: G21 Company Applicant: Howard Seelig P.O. Box 1925 Seelig Family Properties Bellevue, WA 98009 P.O. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 Contact: Bryan Borchers CDA Pirscher Architects, Inc. P.O. Box 55429 Seattle, WA 98155 File Number: LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H Project Manager: Nancy Weil, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two office/retail buildings with associated surface/structure parking and landscaping on a 4.8-acre site. The proposed Building A is 84,670 gross square feet two stories over two levels of parking. Building B is 38,934 gross square feet with one level of structure parking under the south section. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Access to the site would be via two private drives from NE 48th Street. According to the City's Critical Areas map, the site contains Protected Slopes. Continued on next page Project Location: 1900 Block of NE 48th Street(SE 76th Street in City of Newcastle) Exist. Bldg. Area gsf.• N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area: 123,604 sq. ft. Site Area: 209,468 sq. ft. (4.8 acres) Proposed New Garage Area: 136,766 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee Issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M). •,'s� i Project Location Map ERCRPT05-114 City of Renton PIBIPW Department 40, Envirc. ntal Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1,2005 Page 2 of 8 Project description continued. The proposed development would be stepped up the slope of the site thereby reducing the visual impact of the structures. From the east, Building A would have a two story elevation. The site is currently a vacant forested parcel abutting the City of Newcastle, with single-family residential use to the east and south. Within the City of Renton, the adjacent properties to the west and north are also zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and developed with multi-family and a self-storage facility. The proposal is for a mix use of office and retail use. The applicant proposes to retain existing vegetation along the easterly 85 feet of the site providing additional buffer between the existing residential and no impact to areas of protected slope. The subject site is designated on the City's Critical Areas Maps as containing Erosion and Landslide Hazards, Critical and Sensitive Slopes. The site has an upward slope of 30% from west to east with areas of 40% in the eastern portion that qualify as protected slope. A drainage swale has been identified bisecting the northern portion of the site and flowing east to west, entering the site from a 12-inch concrete pipe tight-lined from the residential development. The drainage channel has been determined not to qualify as protected water class by the City's Critical Areas Regulations. Access to the site is proposed from two ingress/egress driveways along the southside of NE 48th Street. The eastern most driveway would be located approximately 105 feet from the east property line. The second drive is located along the west property line. The two accesses would be connected by an internal drive aisle, which is proposed to encircle the buildings. Access into the below grade structured parking would be from the east elevation with the exit at the south end of the structure. Within the structured parking, 297 parking stall are proposed, and 101 surface stalls along the east and west sides of the site. The parking ratio provided has been calculated for office use, which based on the proposed square footage would require a minimum of 324 parking stalls and a maximum of 479. The applicant is providing a total of 398 parking stalls. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Commercial Corridor district is characterized by concentrated pre-existing commercial activity, primarily in a linear form, that provides necessary goods and services for daily living, accessible to nearby neighborhoods, serving a sub-regional market and accommodating large volumes of traffic. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department *,: Environ. ntal Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1,2005 Page 3 of 8 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 6. This project shall be subject to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 1. 7. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, estimated at 1,037 trips. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 24 0, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Geo Group Northwest, Inc, dated August 17, 2004 prepared for the Kennydale Business Park proposed site. The 4.8-acre site a downward average slope of 30 percent to the west. The site does contain areas of 40% slope with 15-foot rise qualifying as protected slope. The areas are located within the easterly 90 feet of the site. The site plan submitted by the applicant does not propose to impact these areas. However, information staff requested regarding analysis of the 40% or greater slope areas was received in a preliminary format just prior to this report. The slope analysis prepared by Hugh Goldsmith indicated a larger area of the site qualifying as protected slope. The area impacted by the proposed development is located near the southeast side of the eastern surface parking lot. The applicant is in the process of having the plans revised regarding the slope. The revised plans may propose a retaining wall and drive aisle in a small portion of the protected slope. If the applicant wishes to pursue impact to the protected slope, a Hearing Examiner Variance would be required. As a condition of Site plan, a Native Growth Protection Area shall be required for the areas of protected slope. The remainder of the site is to be cleared and graded for construction of the structures, access drives and landscaping. In order to level the slope site for the parking and building pads and estimated 18,000 cubic yards of material is proposed to be excavated. Compacted fill is estimated at 9,000 cubic yards. Any material not to be used on site, and is anticipated to be suitable for off-site use will be trucked to development sites along 1-405 corridor. An estimated number of truckloads would be 400 trips. The cuts required for the construction of the below grade parking structure proposed under Building A would be approximately 25 feet in height. A retaining wall may be necessary along the west property line with an average height of 60 feet. On the eastside of the proposed buildings and surface parking, an estimate of 10 feet is anticipated for the retaining wall and cuts. Nine (9) exploratory borings were drilled on the site. The subsurface soils are characterized as consisting of glacially consolidated lacustrine silty clays with some interbedded lenses of dense sand. The Geotechnical Engineering Study concluded the site is not susceptible to liquefaction. ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department *4000 Envira ital Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1, 2005 Page 4 of 8 The estimated impervious surface for the development is 62%. The applicant estimates construction to begin in late spring or early summer of 2006. Due to the slope of the site and the proposed cuts and construction of retaining walls, staff recommends that the applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. In order to reduce the potential for erosion and sedimentation to the site and to adjacent properties, staff recommends additional mitigation including that the project be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Vol. 112001 DOE Stormwater Management Manual 2. Surface Water/Storm Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by Poggemeyer Design Group, dated July 21, 2004 prepared for the Kennydale Business Park proposed site. The proposed storm water flow control is in accordance with Level 1 requirements of the King County Stormwater Design Manuel. Surface water sheet flows across the site and from a culvert drainage pipe from the east. The sheet flow and channel flow would be conveyed to a stormwater detention vault. Water quality is required as the proposal contains more than one acre of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use. Erosion protected swales would convey surface water on the eastside of the buildings to three type 2 catch basin structures discharging to the vault. Roof runoff would be tight line to the detention vault as well. There is an existing storm drainage facility located in NE 48th Street. Drainage along the frontage of the site would be conveyed to existing system in NE 48th The storm water vault would then discharge to the existing system located in an easement to the south into a concrete lined channel then to a 12-inch pipe to the existing stormwater system. A culvert drainage ditch, which enters the site through a 12-inch concrete pipe from the east and bisects the property near the north side, has been determined not to qualify as a regulated water class under the City of Renton Critical Areas Regulations. A report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc and supported by an evaluation of the watercourse by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife concluded the drainage does not support salmonids at any time of the year. The Associated Earth Sciences, Inc report assessed approximately 500 feet upstream and downstream of the site. The drainage for this area is part of the Gypsy Sub basin drainage. This project drains to Lake Washington. Due to documented downstream flooding in this area, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual - Level I Flow ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro,�ntal Review Committee Staff Report Kennydate Business Park LUA-05-114,ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1, 2005 Page 5 of 8 Control for design of both detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces. A preliminary drainage report has been submitted for review. The report addresses the 1998 KCSWM. Mitigation Measures: 1. This project shall be subject to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 1. 2. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 3. Fire Protection Impacts: Fire Prevention staff indicates that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide required improvements and fees. The proposal would add new construction to the City, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. Therefore, the applicant will be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee is estimated at $64,274.08 ($0.52 x 123,604 sq. ft. = $64,274.08) and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of building square footage. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 4. Access/Transportation Impacts: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was required as part of the project and submitted with the land use application. The TIA was prepared by William Popp Associates, dated June 11, 2004. Two driveways on the south side of NE 48th Street would provide access to the site. The analysis reviewed existing conditions, transit facilities in the area, trip generation and peak hour operations at several intersections. NE 48th Street changes names to SE 76th at the Renton/Newcastle city limits just to the east of the site. Down the hill to the west, NE 48th Street intersects with Lake Washington Blvd NE,which is a minor arterial along the intersection with NE 48th Street. The site development proposes 398 parking stalls within surface lots and structured below grade parking, which is within the range for allowed parking. An internal 24-foot wide two-way driveway is shown on the site plan encircles the buildings, connecting the two driveways. Half street improvements will be required along the frontage of the site. Additionally, the applicant shall be responsible for extending the two-way turn lane on NE 48th street to the City limits. Additionally, the Lake Washington Boulevard/NE 44th/1-405 NB ramps intersection is regulated by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and is considering an all-way stop control for this intersection. Our transportation division has apprised WSDOT of this project. The proposed Kennydale Business Park would generate new vehicular trips to the city's street system and, therefore, is required to pay a traffic mitigation fee. Based in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for the Land Use Code 710, General Office Building and pass-by trip reductions associated with the expansion were also estimated. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The development is projected to generate 1,360.88 new daily trips. The fee for this proposal is estimated at $102,066.00 (1,360.88 trips x$75.00 = $102,066.00). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, estimated at 1,360.88 trips. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. 5. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposed buildings range in height from 30 feet to maximum of 50 feet. The building materials proposed consist of concrete, steel and decorative metal work. Decorative parapet structures are shown approximately every 75 ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton P/8/PW Department *Ago, Enviroi ital Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1,2005 Page 6 of 8 feet along both the east and west roof elevations. The height of the proposed structures complies with the Development Standards, however due to the slope of the site, the existing residential properties to the east may experience view impacts due to the development. The building itself is not expected to project high enough to impede views or block light, however, potential roof top equipment and/or wireless communication facilities may. This issue will be evaluated further during site plan review. Mitigation Measures: N/A Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 21, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 GPM. One hydrant is required within 150 ft. of the structures and four (4) additional hydrants are required within 300 ft. of the structure 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 ft. of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-ft.width with a turning radius of 45 ft, outside and 25 ft. inside radius. 4. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous material to be used or stored on site. Buildin 1. The project shall comply with the recommendations of the soils report and provide site monitoring by the geotechnical engineer. Plan Review—Surface Water/Storm Drainage 1. Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC)for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of$0.249 x the new impervious surface area. Estimated fees for surface water is $ 32,506.70 based on an estimated 130,549 square feet of new impervious surface area. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. This project drains to Lake Washington. Due to documented downstream flooding in this area, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual - Level I Flow Control for design of both detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces. A preliminary drainage report has been submitted for review. The report addresses the 1998 KCSWM. 3. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. The first order of business shall be installation of a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on- site improvements as well as building construction. ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro. tal Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114,ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1,2005 Page 7 of 8 Plan Review—Water 1. Water System Development Charges (SDC)for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of$0.213 x the square footage of the site. Estimated fees for water is $44,616.68 based on 209,468 sq. feet. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 4,500 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Fire flow calculation is 500 gpm more than what is available. Applicant will need to reduce fire flow demand to meet available fire flow. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Extension of a looped 12-inch water main and installation of new hydrants on site around the building is required. 5. Building exceeds thirty feet in height. A backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. 6. A pressure-reducing valve is required to be installed at the domestic meter. 7. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards.For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building; applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 8. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. Applicant shall provide a Sewer Availability Certificate from Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. Plan Review—Street Improvements 1. Half street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs, and streetlights along the frontage in NE 48th Street are required. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 3. This development shall extend the existing two-way left-turn lane on NE 48th Street (SE 76th Street) to the east to the Renton city limits. The City has concerns with potential conflicts between through traffic on NE 48th St and traffic entering and exiting the two proposed driveways serving the site. Extending the two-way left-turn lane would reduce the potential impacts and allow all movements into and out of the site. 4. A traffic study was submitted as part of the application. However, the TIA does not include discussion of available sight distance on NE 48th St at the two access driveways proposed to serve the site. This information shall be submitted to the Plan Review. In Development Services. Plan Review—General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility; drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 4. Separate permits and fees for water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 6. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a ERCRPT05-114.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department VAMOIEnviro, ;ntal Review Committee Staff Report Kennydale Business Park LUA-05-114, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF November 1,2005 Page 8 of 8 separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. ERCRPT05-114.doc a� 2 Spy LAT 2 Y r Jr.i,•n t _ a LOT 1 ixf c ` !aria► < O os¢ piNrev a<ta,4za cr, los"A it ,!<)7 N N ,moi r�NV /N•a<fa �, •~ �` i . i mss.<, t 14 vi , ��< ... .a• 4 ^ n Cat 2a� tr y3 t •�13'.<.<I tS I IN 4 = it ,J 12 to QF ue QF a �� 11 It wel-ta./nr• •_ .t a'rjT +. • � •,r ry � 1c <�• J ti to ,ar-p`'�� f !o < •Xl.2! ` .� Aid ay.•a F� u 'a3 I 7 Q Lot 1 ' +,Jim ' ,y¢a r.< . S(IC i^':•<a.<,... � .aa't,a / So 40 1 EMS _jw- ,rr/ar ae, 6`ig9►A I x.611 1 N �.�'• ��,ta I a Iyfwy� '�r1 ' f.ar✓(''� ,. w •ill r f.IfN-��• l Q W N •hi.er �� .. ya .. i 1;184 s 183 AFjrey 1 Z 165 h ='z r LOT I ,./r•f/-ef.• LOT 3 Z •4 M t N O • ;pp s eta � .• . .✓.M•IS•Ofb. ,� a q, .-,.70 tat 2 w� 6 r _ 4 REN: SP 011-87 6802168005 ; as 117r r < ai Trd (gp.tpiLT /Wi aNrtY L1Mr1Y•-Cas.iS „ <.. .01 AEP Cp h7 •v SAW" e r 4" � SE. 60TH SL X70..' .ase. azar 306.74 MOS-AIG 56 Mi NE 32 24� i J 3M!M 3115 AIiH�AY AIMN qlB� . bm'NO1N3cA lil 4S3N(30V 3S3NI3f19 TWO tNN3-A ari a I I IIII jj�llll IIII I I I I / +/f I I 1 � I I Ji Ile 1�L ! ,/s o \ j II 111\! ! \III\ \1 '11 I \' 1 '1111 I , I \ 11 N11I`II Ili 11 it II .I I II} I I I�� I ; I 1!A� I II,I I I ,i II 1 \ I ', I I IIII i I II 1 11 II I�1 I 1 1 11 IIi � \\`. \ 10 Nr III' I I S•\\ \ � � i \, \ \ \� �` \ \ 1ri r. 11 I l r l I f I I r l l IT_l RH'7.1 � I I 1 1 1 � \ i I I I \ 1 \ \ \ \ ` ! // / I i � r 7 , d�6r; l ,/ ,•�i l �I I i"� I ! � I I � I I! v I I I/ ! / �i IV ! $ Il,_ ,C P` \ \ ToFbclRpPl+IG SUEZ """^'°" ' or W'616 SWVA Of 40,4/4 W SSG 29,T14n1 KW W.M. • a WN MM •+%.r/:i!'�/ice:Jiiii%�:�ii.� . .r/ �/ iiJU•r/�//�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii—� /i...."n.l�. r �� _— / /�/ ��lJ r si°I r/%%A/� ���- � PA•r///%%�/%I J�Jii///%I/I%I%%%%%%% /�; Gw.rs (n�� ////iiiii/iiii...�� /,�rii iri✓:• %/� � � vrryliiiiiiii%ii//�/-/./ �/ // //�•s ss�i �/iii �r .v �-��crsra� mss,-�.rr s ��..- -moi i///_ Iii //.(///_/i/// i_li.I-• i,�r���{ . �;, - ,7�-' �,.� •°y-�i•�r�. rJj,�� �r?.i/�...•, =y r/�%// %�ii'1 1 °rI%�'%�J"I%/•��i/v�►�ir� rii•/ii�•_ jai �' Wim='--;.:.� - �_ r.•./ /i �' q � /// i vii ��Am i►TTiiw\ ♦. viii L✓I/ r I, /or" r I:r/''// 4i /// / rim _/��.,/i � �'�Ols��ryl !!� O// � •� -,C �� /.`ii f I�1�� ` �+t -o.►, -- ` • ile ry.1 / �g ..— �•i.,.../.Z ii u. �:_ s•�Vil i�r�< SM SMIR NO °- MAN s. OMMP-P �a'1 ■�. �. `�' Le�lllil111�41idllpilll�41�"tl��� �a�" - __ , Iib - ' �• i cD € Z f RESIDENTIAL ZONE 111 7_ _ o-47TE — — 63572 — — — — — — — — — — — R I ti-----——— -- ———————————————— _--------_ ----------_— ___'------------ UREARYARD 5MACK — II �ui I it I Waoi►.nw � .....aaae. r I t MIR .�.be •. ; I Io �•� : _ PI PARKING LEVEL - -n STALLS rt i .w w .."v —► ► NE r + I Lll q BUILDING A , WING I ""�"` BUILDING A , WING 2 Z I Ei ROOF SHOWNROOF SHOWN 1 I �I BUILDING B, U11NCs 1 -------- ROOF ------ROOF BUILDING B, WING 2 ROOF SHOWN 111 L. 2 _ I r J � x -.I- P5 PARKINCs LEVEL - 22 STALLS y _ w �� 12.WdTF.B_LLNE__ i ,•,•r wewxA .,vnfrw N0'S6'IB`EEb ,w w•wrt _ _—— _ r„v m._.- —._. _. 0 -coF RQ N 3 Q r _ Q. i � tl7 ZZ finrtW�e�, F I �• ...aw.-, ,Kr,aw tl...•onm. - ❑ Mx.4lPlm•4N�OYRMr K V AML„CIYIl. �fTl�-OI�.MI bctYY�KPn,• al•,- IK,CMMA"V.Lm.'- GGICNIkfWt�IL IGlIU YD iCII��'+RY � 11YM M�1l,YWbIwG♦Ygtl� �_ •fMl lll'I••.YN.1LL• . \ {tLM N'o0"A'R tl,UI M - tly- rNl MUM�u.W N.uu N SITE FLAN • .... - �... i' i�riifi Irl��r_ ■r. �� fii,iiil■ ! �---1110111 - MINIMUM-iiilliifilli i I!III��wilijjiiiiijjiiiiijjiinijj!�i-jjiiiiijjiiilliillillil ►N�y,;,�?1 illliilliil..affil..alu._.I11,00511 ina.Ijjl...Ijj'Sall�ll�jlu.g11-111■1111111111•••1111...Ijjl...Ijjl...Ij11...111uu111..aii...IIET ' � i dill' Iilllliiilliiiiilliiunilliiiiilliiiiilliiiiilliuiuilliiiiilliiill�IGlj ��jlillilliiilliiiiillioinilliiiiilliiiiilliiiiilliiu6illiiiiilliiilli11i I 11111■1■111■ lillil jji ijlillli �■�� -!_■_�I�I�II�II�IIlillolilil,IIJ 1IUMII� MIMI �®IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ......,.,..., �►_. .�►_ .�1 -..moi\ �►_. ::�...-...-..,.,..._.� :1�1 ._r...� ,.....- -_...f.....`.�:.......,., X1.1■.:.—.....� ■■..■,�-_.. "`".,. ��� _ —Iliiiii i��."`i�iiiiiN--'—�•1-i- 1 ITilliiiNiiiiipiiliuiliiiii iiiii i�iiiilimniliiiiiYiiiUilli Il�illiiilliiiiij iuilii �'--- ii■■1 iii iii i i ill iii i— i �u■u iii WE ill ilii iiiii•111■ul-iiiiiliiil�l�i i_:_: i:.� l>:'iiilliiiiillul■■�IliiiiiNiiiii iiiii ■■■ iiiiiliii ' :I 1 - - --I---I -:II'I'I I --I-C-;1'----I•---'i:- -I'--:'II'---'I' 1..,,. �*I■II I.■■111■.■111■..■.Rill!.■■1 II■.■1111■.■IILIR■le■III■.■111■■■11.11:11 gs! ��e ee_ ■I■les!lessee!■••1■I eyes:��seee.l_eseel.e�ee_e:..l:eee.les�� 1ue16...ilu..dli..iilli��ill'"""IlniGillailinallm lillil._.:MONEY .. .. ..lil■RE•- ..---�.....—.._..__ �i�xinuil -�� nmmaix Inln lillil�Ili�ii���ollllillil IiII�lI�11i�7i�;iiilliJlillil I�II�II����Illlilil MGI i■■■ - r: : N�IIIIINIIIIIIRI 1■■�; i�D �iiiiiiiiiiliii■r■■r■iiiiiii�i- — �111�il�illllillillil hlhlhlh��lill•�••lir-�-?;=1�='— • r RESIDENTIAL ZONE LLJ (s - _'-�- - - - - _ - - - _ - - _ _ _ _f_�_________L_ 10.571WE 635.12' T! t ----_'------- -------------------a5'L7NDSCAPNU SETBACK'---_---�--___-_-___---__-_-_------__---_ -_- l 1 5'REAR YARD SETBACK .1 I RETAMNG W4LL l L - y PI PARKING LEVEL - 19 STALLS I N I z __.. II •—•fes-------------------------- � _ o amr• srszi o I—Mt --------------------------• W Q W 3 f— �— ham' sort 0 N N0'56'18"E 63514' L Q Y(W COFMEROIAL ZONE IlY{ ip NOTE. THIS TREE PLAN ONLY ILLUSTRATES THE EXISTING TREES THAT WILL BE AFFECTED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION, AND ARE � SLATED FOR REMOVAL. -- /1EXISTING TREE PLAN I v 1"=20'-0" L2 �r'i COCi�Ci«`i CPc C •�`� CCi moi` rR►7 PCO�Oi�i C�`C.'�,i•v%,./..•i!"i►►►►►wii<�4•0�y►wAA••9iO•ii!mrOSi•••iiiOiAiQRa►►iwii•"•0!�rrriOA0•9rAiOi•a°•i••iou«^❖°•!iii0>'.r•il❖:•aiwii`ri:i❖.i°•iairi^�.ii•.i•�••iiw�i°rriiw�o>i�r0iroO�.i❖i•►°•iiwii•a••�r•«�Apw•A•i°pO0wiAce>i0wi••••v.••wiO••csiiri•ii•iii•«iO^•iO•ir•ji••wi•iO'ii«iAii.riA"jiiiiir�•iiiOair'iiOrii>ii•A'i0iiOoi•�iAr•iiiiA�ii•ii•i•!D••iiiAi2°ii«y•iii•�.!itiriii•i••i«ir.w•ie4.Ai•i��1A4ii�sOii_Oir,s`ii;•''A•so.iO"i`i0a'>�::rt�Oii�p�y�diwr�.►•i.'':►wctyAOiAzwAclei_:'rAia;a.L�:iiw•�iO>�•fA••imi•i!iOa•iwirrOO:•iApiAi>iiA••a�•i•ai.�ri.°iA.�."ii«r�iiA"O.A0ai♦ri0a s°•iiiAA•,Ji•.••iOiOwirs°•ie�.0S°ia.iA•o""wr••iis••�iiiOii.«0iOi•riOri•i�i•r•is«•"irA0"ri0w«i0•i•�ai••iOiriO'iAiaire�'.�ip�.9iAwAiiA•«0i•iA.«A0iii❖r0°•Aii0�•iA."00iOi•ia0J•iiip'•rA.Ci•OiAAir•iAwiOr!9y•r•►•°•AiOiO°Oii•is✓OpriiO••ic••CaA°wo•C•!'••i.•ACOA•�•iaiii'�.•aO•wrCAii!0"A•iriAr"`ir•1 iOi ❖ DOAiCOOn Ow'0•irrA0piiOiCA•0°i•Oiii•r�iiArCp.••iAi�'i•i0ii�A•!0rAO�i•r"i0•`iii••riA.-«-Ci0rriWiAO.•iyr0ri«•-'OA.prC.«•!A ii- M MRiA • i0°.O0.Wo' •OiOii•�w�i•!�����:,..���?:!.;,•;��:,-���,j!'��'ii•,i .:.:.,-. .- P►�pAAii•AA rAA•ilii>i44•i r•A�Oi•>9•iiiii'i°.9�e� r�«««d>�'i s'r'�e.a:`.c:tw.�:..:!JrL::o:�:::::•::::.•OAi�iAOrriii•Arg'i'OAi••:irie••OpOp•Orrp•Orrp�r�•o;;,,i:. ►i•"iiir•>•r❖.tir•Air•>0•rw•r•�.ii>yrriiiiiii•Ai••i►ii"AiAiiiiiii0•ii•0•i•Aiiiiiiii•"•iis°cas^ria?i°i•Aiiiii•Aiiiii"ii•Aii0••Orii•A i9•i09•iDAi°i:•i•Ae•"•rea••=i"i,�'a/;ic !i pit►�Oiiiriiiii0•Oririp0•••1000.0ii"JO•ir0•i•Di•i4••O►Oroi•OOrri0•iri•AOwD••Oii•Oir4�ri0•Orrri0°r=i"irr0•r•D•O•i•OA•Or►irrw•rprrrgrr•�•.� ♦ri••iii"iiiiii•.9•ii••iO,�:�t;/,•'i. '� �:1'!P••Osi•��•Oi•ODOOiiyO i❖••. wOrri❖riir►Oi•OOOAOii•OOOOAOOiOOAA00Oe•OO•rr•OAOOO••OO••OOO•p•O••aq'O"oi•OO••AOOOO••Odrbiiiiiiii•OOii•Aii•OiiiiAv4,r f I OOii«OA•.i:•e•>O••2AAO•.i.�iri4ii0•Aiar0�rO••iiip•00.0•r•Orpi>x90.OrOAOr•OAOr•OAOOp•Or•OOr•OOi•••0rp•OoyOrp•Oa,�w•rrw❖rr❖.•.b❖.•.i000OOii•Oii•Ai•Oi•O.O•Or?q�. -./ � ►�Priiiiiiiii•iiid:•O+S"O•iiii❖i•••••riiiitii>iiiiiii•OADOODOOOOOOi!•^OOOA00.•a•AAi•000A00.0•00OOOOAAOOOOAi Dir0•ri0•ODOir.0•i�Or9•i�.•A000AOOOAi�00r•.:„��•/ ', o!O9i•OOAiiii•OAOMI N •AAii• •ii•OAi r•°0.•r••p•OOAi•OOrysAAAAA••ii0i0•ri•DO•pr^•Oprp0•ii4•ii•Oaa e❖,�r•AOi•Oi,'AOi�A••AO.Oi•O.iOAO'ai"i°AiiOPrrr°r°i'+•iiiir°•"iO�L l:/'�b•�••••'•••��•�0"Oii•OOOPAOO�OAii•A•AAi•O"•>!AOAi•Ai•Oi•Ai•OAae•i•A•iii!A�!i!>•i!J iiiQO"•s•i"Oiii• i'Oiiio•0•si°d0i0""vAd.••Ai=i°r°iOPOi•Ai•Oiii•Oi•Ai�Oi•Oii•Oir►siii ii,a,� �.�y��������� i•_�ti������Q�.>w��ci������w��ib•�.:a 1,��is=_s.������r�►��_��*������������r����•�������•��• �.rs•^r">�"i ��.� "r❖.•.rOi►r fi ;I O"i 01 Is $�r ««��•= ALV V�V ■• ■ r ■' ■' V :3sY%il[i1!«]1«_ �«E`t f !I- �li�l���l���������1����' ON 4t «BUILDING-� � ��� I!tIIIIIIIIInIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� l s �/!_ , ®� CM t SE 64th St. , T r'- �s .f CollJf kp yj 1 J/ 68th f 43 cu ........ .._ .... t cu .......... Tori - - - -- z SE 72nd St:__._. i / orq 8 R- NE 50th St. CA CA R48 St. SE 76th St. SE 76th W-� ` O SE L77th Pl. C A � -� .77th t � S _c A - If -- [ d SE 80th St. 1 C4 - 32 T24N RM E 1/2 Lo 0 L ZONING ---- Rmton at,umtto 1:4600 B4 Q P/B✓PW TECHNICAL SERVICES Y >�04 29 TUN R5E E 1/2 9 - M CITY k..rF RENTON ..Il Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 31, 2005 Ramin Pazooki Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-6388 SUBJECT: Kennydale Business Park, LUA 05-144, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki: I received your response letter dated October 24, 2005 and have enclosed a copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA) for the subject project as requested. Once you have had an opportunity to review the TIA, please let me know your evaluation of this project in regards to generating any impacts on the State Highway System. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 425-430-7270 or email at nweil(cTci.renton.wa.us. Respectfully, Nancy Weil Senior Planner Cc: Kayren Kittick i 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N 9 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ern' ®W► Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Douglas B. MacDonald P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 206-440-4000 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov DEVELOPMEW PLANNING CITY OF RENTON October 24, 2005 OCT 2 8 2005 Nancy Weil RECEIVED City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Kennydale Business Park(136,766 ft' Multi-Use Commercial) LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF SR 405 MP 7.20 (R) vicinity Dear Ms. Weil: We thank you for giving WSDOT this opportunity to comment through SEPA on the above referenced development. We would like to review the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)prepared for this project. The review of the TIA will determine if the proposed action will have any impacts on the State Highway System, particularly SR 405. If you have any questions, or require additional information please contact Felix Palisoc of our Developer Services section by phone at 206-440-4713, or via e-mail at palisoEt wsdot.wa.gov. Sinc rely, �� Ramin Pazooki Local Agency and Development Services Manager RP:fsp C:\Feli x_DevSery\SE PA_Responses\sepa RE NTO N_1405 M P7 Ken nydal a Busi n essPa rk.doc City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-11"I ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson OCT 1 1 ZQi: SITE AREA: 209, 468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross):260,370 sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO: 77482 UTILITY SYSTEMS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Impacts Impacts Information Impacts Impacts Information Earth Housing Air Aesthetics water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural Historial Cultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROP'--'-Y SERVICES FEE REVIEW #12005-_✓ ,)Q, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAEVIEW ROUTING SLIP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑ } OTHER APPLICANT t I ° ,V� `1 (!k „ (G �C 4`lC� �% RECEIVED FROM ( k `ita j!-,, f. 't JOB ADDRESS: C WO## -J -7 ` F" (date) f NATURE OF WORK � GREEN#L r45, -- C'( ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION W' SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 11SQUARE FOOTAGE 11VICINITY MAP 11NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID#_� J� �' ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement( vt)WATER Latecomer Agreement ( vt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement ( vt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District ' Traffic Benefit Zones ^$75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPOR'T'ATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE- WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1,525/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo$915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property (not less than$1525.00)x ? n `' 4, 6, - Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) N Never Pd ' Single family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$720/unit x Apartment, Condo$540/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.126/sq. ft, of property (not less than$900.00) x REllEYELOPMENT;CREISIT '.., -- ,,. Does r4 APPLY El Nf ay APPLY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Sin le family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $715/unit x All other properties$0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x gt (not less than$715.00) i 1 �� 32, PRELIMINARY TOTAL $h-C 6 ) J K N w O g Lure of Reviewing Authority DATE to * If subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. m ** If an additional water meter(or hydrant) is being installed for fire protection or an additional water meter is being installed for private <. h landscape irrigation, please advise as above fees may change. s �C 0 EFFECTIVE:January 1,2005 *00RMC 4-1-180 I (2)(d)(iv) Exemptions to System Development Charge - Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped Major Easement(s) When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge, undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the development charge(s). The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this exemption. "Wo, *mot CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 24, 2005 TO: Nancy Well FROM: Jan Illian x7216 SUBJECT: KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LUA 05-114 1900 Block of NE 48"'Street I have reviewed the application for Kennydale Business Park located generally at the 1900 block of NE 48b Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an existing 12-inch main in NE 48"' Street. The proposed project is located in the 320 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. Static pressure in the area is approximately 100 psi. Derated fire flow available in NE 48`"is 4,000 gpm. SEWER Sewer service is available, however sewer service will be provided by Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. Please call 425-235-9200. STORM There are storm drainage facilities in NE 48"'Street. STREETS There is no sidewalk, curb, gutter, or streetlighting fronting the site. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Water System Development Charges (SDC) for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of$0.213 x the square footage of the site. Estimated fees for water is$44,616.68 based on 209,468 sq. feet. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 4,500 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Fire flow calculation is 500 gpm more than what is available. Applicant will need to reduce fire flow demand to meet available fire flow. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Extension of a looped 12-inch water main and installation of new hydrants on site around the building is required. 5. Building exceeds thirty feet in height. A backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. 6. A pressure-reducing valve is required to be installed at the domestic meter. 7. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices Kennydale Business Park October 25,2005 'hal/'' vri installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 8. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed.A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Applicant shall provide a Sewer Availability Certificate from Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) for commercial sites are assessed at a rate of$0.249 x the new impervious surface area. Estimated fees for surface water is $ 32,506.70 based on an estimated 130,549 square feet of new impervious surface area. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Fees are subject to change January 2006. 2. This project drains to Lake Washington. Due to documented downstream flooding in this area, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual - Level I Flow Control for design of both detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces. A preliminary drainage report has been submitted for review. The report addresses the 1998 KCSWM. 3. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. The first order of business shall be installation of a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Half street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs, and streetlights along the frontage in NE 48U'Street are required. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 3. A traffic study has been submitted for review................... MISCELLANEOUS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. 2 Kennydale Business Park October 25,2005 'moi 2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 3. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Traffic mitigation fees are 2. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. cc:Kayren Kittrick 3 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: &n COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: n JAri , SITE AREA:209,468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross):260,370 sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO:77482 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Earth Impacts Impacts Information Impacts Impacts Information Housin Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural Historicl Cultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info tion is nee to roperly assess this proposal. _ Signature of DirectoV�Ithorized Representative Date M'"� `VOW City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fw' Ce COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED:OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike-BeiV2370 SITE AREA: 209,468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross): sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO:77482 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Earth Impacts Impacts Information Impacts Impacts Information Housing Air Aesthetics Water Licht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural Histortcl Cultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in ation is needed properly assess this proposal.ot— �-- Signature of Director uthorized Representative Date S# �� c� ,. NT Project Name: IC�tyNyppt� B�S�NEss �p,2�� Project Address: -Boo 16)OCAL Contact Person: 4pwraet. Sc-eut-4 Permit Number: WA 05- IN Project Description: —Iwo a�v(, 1vW�Tt- SE Give „T k4 123. IPO OF COMM.rrra A O Sty Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential C}--ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition ❑ Retail �Traffic Study WiLA,4AtA ?Opp RsS0,AA 1v& Non-retail ❑ Other Calculation: as.V,0q X ,�.vl = �,3t�0, Sa .�:ps Cr�c� 000 00 Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: j ( Date: io � I-Nzz - T Date of Payment: rrr✓0, City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '' COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike-Betson SITE AREA:209, 468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross):260-#070 sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO:77482 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Earth Im acts Imp-acts Information Impacts Impacts Information Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural HistorldCultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet MF SST '' B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date MS`S O� FIRE DEPARTMENT 's M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 11, 2005 TO: Nancy Weil, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha SUBJECT: Kennydale Business Park, 1900 B1 NE 48" St. MITIGATION ITEMS: 1. A fire mitigation fee of$64,962.04 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the buildings square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4500 GPM, one hydrant is required with 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-foot in width with a turning radius of 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. 4. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous materials to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:Aeresite.doc City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F,rt COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005..._------ 7 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: ?OBER 1d, ©05 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER,'Nan PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike DotsonAPT 4.3' SITE AREA: 209, 468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross):260,37 sq ft t LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO:77482 4 M SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan revew-for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Impacts Impacts Information Impacts Impacts Information Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural HistortclCultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet o tv V0 B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS kv C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 45 a / dC leo th'e have re vi4Ned this applica tidnl with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identifiedar as of probable impact or areas lereldditional informa is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature o irector or Authorized R resentative Date *gnwo' *rr►" City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 209, 468 sq/ft BUILDING AREA(gross):260, 370 sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO: 77482 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Impacts Impacts Information Impacts Impacts Information Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural Historid Cultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information ' need to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorize sentative Date 1%001 'ver City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P"V_6 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2005 APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED:OCTOBER 10,2005 APPLICANT: Howard Seelig/Seelig Family Properties PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Kennydale Business Park PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA:209, 468 sq/ft I BUILDING AREA(gross):260,370 sq/ft LOCATION: 1900 Block of NE 48th ST. WORK ORDER NO:77482 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Necessary Environment Minor Major Necessary Earth Impacts impacts Information Im acts Impacts Information Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Natural HistoriclCultural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS It)x We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whew dditional informatio eeded to proper) assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Autho iz Representative Date ��Y 0 -- -------- Proposed Mitigation Measures: GOA The following mitigation measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.Other mitigation may be required following further review of the project proposal.These recommended mitigation measures address project impacts not v covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed.The silt fence Nrr l be in place before Gearing and shalgrading is initiated,and shall be constructed in conformance with the NOTICE OF specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM).This will be required during APPLICATION the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. ANDPROPOSED DETERMINATION OF 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point.Vegetation growth shall be established in the dkch by seeding or NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (D placing sod Depending on site grades,it may be necessaryto l ne the tlitU We h rock to protect Me ditch from erosion NS-M) and to retluce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented it the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site.This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction.3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimntation control measures e DATE: October 10,2005 at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. LAND USE NUMBER: 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision LUA05-114,SA-H,ECF to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works PROJECT NAME: inspector for me construction of the civil improvements of the plat.Certification of the installation,maintenance and Kennydale Business Park proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. Site PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applipnt is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner 5. Applicant shat Fee:Fee of$p,52 w the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. feet oft commercial space with construction �6 766;quare fast,twostories of park ngr Tiressit.Approximately ntains sensitive,61004 square Fire Mitigation per square foot of new building construction;and two site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to to site would be from NE 48th Street vain two access drives,The 7. Traffic Mitigation Fee:Fee of$75.00 par each new average weekday trip attributable to the proposal PROJECT LOCATION: 1900 block of NE 48th St. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Nancy Weil,Senior Planner,Development Services OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS411):As the Lead Agency,the Cit of Renton Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2005.This matter is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on November 22,2005,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely T result from: proposed project.Therefore,as 1055 South Grady Way,Renton.if are in Permitted under the RC W 43.21 0.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has notbeenreschedulethe d.If commenlease �rannotthe Development be s bmi�tted i�Mces M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated Into a stice t comment writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearingand resent Period.There will be no comment the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this r p your comments rd the proposal before Mitigated(Dre will q o co a period following the issuance f the Threshold Determination of Non•Significance- additional information by mail,please contact the project proposal,or wish Anyone be made i party of record and receive will Y ppeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. automatically become a party of record and will be notified of army rdeiion on this project mitten comments receive PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 21,2005 CONTACT PERSON: Nancy Well, Tel: (425)430-7270 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2005 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Par APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Bryan Borchers,tel:206.368-9668 nits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review f ( _ Other Permits which may be required: Grading License,Construction Permits,Building Permits and ` w� Fire Permit Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Study,Drainage Study,Geotechnical Engineering Study Including Assessment of all Hazard areas,Stream Analysis r = ��a� I•& 5 I ^ Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Buildin = ^^ glPublic Works Department,Development Services Division,Sixth Floor Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 22,2005 before the Renton Hearing 1 T^,-'� Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th I ' floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: !` ) Land Uae2oning: The site Is designated Commercial Corridor(CC)on the City of Renton X r Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's I I Zoning Map.The commercial and retail uses proposed would be permitted. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: 1 Environmental Checklist and associated reports. Development Regulations If you would like to be made a Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code, this form and return to:City of Rentoparty n,Development to encet Piannitheng,Info Salim on Grady proposedRentproject, O55!ete Requirements,State Environmental Count pdu�Water Design Manual Policy Act,Fire Code. File No./Name: LUA05-114,SA-H,ECF/Kennydale Business Park NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I, 10cr&. JOrZg , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in .3 conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: 4 i(7/ d s SIGNED: ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the State of Wasiftton residing in / i —`1 on the G day of d�j��/ 'ZQa L) f' NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: f• r V CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10'h day of October, 2005, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr, NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Nannez .. Re res�nti n GZI Company- Accpt Ltr Owner Howard Seelig, Seelig Family Properties - Accpt. Applicant Ltr Surrounding Property Owners— NOA only See Attached Agencies - NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT's See Attached (Signature of Sender STATE OF WASH IN ON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) - AiASHIfNGiit' SSION I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin _ y signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /. C& � Notary Public in/hand /for the State of Washington Notary (Print): 04_ �Q� l-(��CI�V My appointment expires: Kennydale Business Park Nino= LUA05-114, SA-H, ECF �r AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology* WDFW-Stewart Reinbold* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 1601h Ave SE 39015-172 nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Bellevue,WA 98008 Auburn,WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle,WA 98106-1514 39015172 nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn,WA 98092-9763 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology& Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S.Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle,WA 98124 Seattle,WA 98104-3855 Olympia,WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor* Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. &Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS:XRD-01 W Tukwila,WA 98188 Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle,WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an"Optional DNS",the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template-affidavit of service by mailing 3343300820024330080006 X3900011004 621 COMPANY AIMCO ANDERSON TOD D PO BOX 17387 C/O DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 7702 111TH PL SE FOUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85269 5550 LB] FREEWAYMAILBOX 28 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 DALLAS TX 75240 323900001005 323900002003 334330078000 ATZBACH JOHN WILLIAM BOURGUIGNON JEAN M+JOANNE BROTMAN SUSAN T 11103 SE 76TH ST 7611 111TH PL SE 7917 OVERLAKE DR W NEWCASTLE WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 BELLEVUE WA 98004 334330114003 323900008000 323900004009-Dnsdfic:f6f AAA#ItW DEITCH MICHAEL J EPLER WILLIAM E+SUSANNA W FUNG BILL S K+HELLEN C COjig(05- 4613 LK WASH BL NE 7729 11ITH PL SE 12520 SE 72ND ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 323900007002 334330084206 323900005006 GODDARD RUTH M HUSON JUNE OLIVE+HOOF KATRI IRWIN SUSAN R 7721 111TH PL SE 11030 SE 76TH ST 7701 111TH PL SE NEWCASTLE WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 323900014008 334330110001 334330110506 KARRELS WILLIAM J+SUK CHA KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION CO %R ] KIM KAY YURI+BARO 7610 111TH PL SE 1000 KIEWIT PLAZA 14863 STATE ROUTE 20 RENTON WA 98056 OMAHA NE 68131 MT VERNON WA 98273 334330112007 323900015005 323900003001 KORYO GROUP LLC PARENTE JOHN J & JOYCE E ROLLINS BENJAMIN A 4710 LAKE WASHINGTON BL NE 11129 SE 76TH ST 7617 111TH PL SE RENTON WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 334330074108 323900006004 334330112502 SABOUR-MOHAJER HOSSEIN SCOTT DAVID J SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS 5031 RIPLEY LN N 7711 111TH PL SE SHUR #48046 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 PO BOX 900933 SEATTLE WA 98109 323900013000 323900010006 323900012002 SUERO JAMES A WAITE BURTON E ]R+DURGA D WORTHINGTON FORREST W 7618 111TH PL SE 7714 111TH PL SE 7626 111TH PL SE NEWCASTLE WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 NEWCASTLE WA 98056 323900009008 334330074207 WYATT RICK & LINDA YUEN HENRY N 7728 111TH PL SE 3600 24TH AV S NEWCASTLE WA 98056 SEATTLE WA 98144 y ,*me Y .r� 00 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: October 10,2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA05-114,SA-H,ECF PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Business Park PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan review for the construction of two buildings multi-use commercial site.Approximately 123,604 square feet of commercial space with 136,766 square feet,two stories of parking.The site contains sensitive slopes.The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA).Access to the site would be from NE 48th Street via two access drives. PROJECT LOCATION: 1900 block of NE 48th St. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 21,2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2005 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Bryan Borchers,tel:206-368-9668 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review Other Permits which may be required: Grading License,Construction Permits,Building Permits and Fire Permit Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Study,Drainage Study,Geotechnical Engineering Study including Assessment of all Hazard areas,Stream Analysis Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Department,Development Services Division,Sixth Floor Renton City Hail,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 22,2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: The site is designated Commercial Corridor(CC)on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map.The commercial and retail uses proposed would be permitted. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist and associated reports. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,King County Surface Water Design Manual Requirements,State Environmental Policy Act,Fire Code. Notice.doc Proposed Mitigation Measures: , The following mitigation measures will likeiy"Rre imposed on the proposed project.Other mitigation moe required following further review of the project proposal. These recommended mitigation measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated,and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or. placing sod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation,maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. Applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 6. Fire Mitigation Fee:Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new building construction;and 7. Traffic Mitigation Fee:Fee of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the proposal Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Nancy Weil,Senior Planner,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2005. This matter is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on November 22,2005,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot tie submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Nancy Weil, Tel: (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION _ 7. tSIP i -- --4 x G l , li I = is . I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA05-114,SA-H, ECF/Kennydale Business Park NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Notice.doc 1 A 40, R � CITY F RENTON 111A Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ;a-thy Keoiker-wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 10, 2005 Bryan Borchers CDA & Pircher Architects, Inca PO Box 55429 Seattle, WA 98155 Subject: Kennydale Business Park LUA05-114, SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Borchers: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. Please provide slope analysis plan, identify 40% slope, and reduced copy. Also, PMT sheet A-2.3 was not included with submittal, please provide. The application is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 1, 2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to.continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public.Hearing on November 22, 2005 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s).'of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, W Nancy Weil Senior Planner cc: GZI Company/Owner Howard Seelig, Seelig Family Properties/Applicant 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE LVD iC City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT stp �6',5 `cif MASTER-- APPLICATION"iEc6ivF, PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: G21 C�n� PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ADDRESS: Kenn A(c F_21ASiAeV5 Irl% P•U �oK 2 S PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: Ren�•n , IJ A l$b��G �el'cvue. °�$Gv� TELEPHONE NUMBER: 14 2 S- qS/-$z 0 5 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) 33LI336 o sz o NAME: I I EXISTING LAND USE(S): OOLJAvtp SCCL�G� VAC_/AQT COMPANY(if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): SFrct_\c, FRvni' �ra er�ics oFF�cr ovER A24L��-1 C-. ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: P. o• (qz s EAC CITY: e/'evuc ZIP: 9$405 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER 5q+-IF- EXISTING ZONING: c-A CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): t,3 NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): ?.0j, y(o$ .5F= �jt- �K �orc�ers SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY(if appli(cable): ( ( DEDICATED: , A A GD/�t + rsc her rc h�t�� N G SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: til/A P• 0• QoX 55`IZ1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: � / _ ACRE(if applicable): t-1 S n��it g Sb NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: N A 2 g NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): �n h �cdacirth- lcy-, p Q:web/pw/devsery/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 1 07/28/05 PRO ^T INFORMATION continu NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): FENR LUE: S o 0 0 0 0 C SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): O NTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL OTAGE(if applicable): BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): ��A R PROTECTION AREA ONESQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL R PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): X23,[oU a 5 F ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): tJ/A GEOLOGIC HAZARD-5 �<<� sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if El HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. applicable): 13 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE El WETLANDS NEW PROJECT(if applicable): Zoo sq.ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE S QUARTER OF SECTION Z1, TOWNSHIP—:Z4 , RANGE r' , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. SEPQ - 45-00 3. 2. Sire `LAtiI �eytEH•1 - p,oc7o 4. Ok Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ 2 o AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) AoiJard L- SEEL_IG , declare that I am (please check one) . the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers her in contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) A. tit, ��'`Q�c.�� � "—� —fie •s, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington $ •_cps I� (Signature of Owner/Representative) / �If Notary(Print) Q' My appointment expires: Q:web/pw/devsery/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 2 07/28/05 C)EVE! ;-i-ANNINCr " %we )N PIRSCHER SEP 2 2oj5 C ARCHITECTS A R C H I T E C T S I N T E R 1 0 R S P L A N N E R S August 24, 2005 KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 167 Hillmans LK WN Garden of Eden#3. Situate in the SE quarter of Section 29,Township 24,Range 5 in the city of Renton,King County,Washington. KeP:"ndailc Bus{ncss Parl ,VVP%99043,kegzfl descrintlion'dIoc Carl F Pirscher,AIA principal 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO BOX 55429 Shoreline, Washington 98155 Tel: (206)-368-9668 Fax:(206)-368-9558 Form 1465 swo-J,S. Return of Partnership Income tMIaNv,.i.u5-.'AI For calendar year 2004,or tax year beginning —`.2004,and Jepat+wt a the r eeew I ending ? 2004 0 04 rkrn/I R/rae;e se:rvt° 'See as --. parate Instructions. A Ptin/py busneee"myN/r,e o/prrtv.-1r:q Use the 621 Company 'O Erepoyerl»nllnea;lb" Imucus« Real Estate IRS Seeli Yartir_ A GE14 PTR iabsL Cr Mnc1p4 duct w seanc proe Other- Nwnbeq,street e"o loan fuY nu:nler.x/P.O.bcx ese INWcuon 91-0824645 Rentals wits, P.O. Box 1925 E ombnb-461sunaa C au/irss oboe"umber print or typo. cl�,er Mw 08/01 6 7 531110 _ I B e 11 evsuue z P cose u e F Terri meets(see Teem/) NA 98009-1525 $ 0 Check Applicable boxes: (1) Host am (2) `F'iael rMan (3) I 1Ivan Chsrtyf (4) Address . H Cheat s000un&V method: (1) Cash (2) ! Accrual � 5e (� V Amended rctum (3) `I Other{spaory). . b. . I Number of 9ctwdules K-1.Anchone for each neon x110 Kea a partner at any rime du the tax -------------—`--- Caution:kx*jdo only lrade'orbuslness inwma and a Ypr • . •1. 2 _ xperuss on Kirea 1e.thro h?2 belort:See Ury inaaitiCtJpma fcr nloro tilfaTnaUcr►. 1 a Gross receipts or sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . . . . 1e. b Lep returns and alowanss. 1 b C 2 Coat of goods said(Schedule A,One 8). . . . . . . . O 3 Gross proGl Subtract Ina 2 from am tc . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 E 4 Orcinery Inomw(loss)Ibom other p@Mw*ps,estates,and ULSW 3 (juach acheocrla). I . 5 Nat farm prC(It(loss)(aUWA Sche"re f(form 1040)) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 S � 6 Net gain(loss)from Form 4797.PM Il,Ina 17. . . . . . . . . . . . . - 6 7 Other incorne(loss) I - f tedi rh schedule). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I 7 j +iss$ Tafel In Son" i0ea).Ccmbine Was 3 h 7 . j ) Selarisi and wages(other ti An to partners)(less em ploymern credits) . . . . _ . 10 Guaranteed t payments b partners . . . . . . . . . . --•__--- 11 Repairs and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Y 12 Bad debts . . . . 17 D cIt 12 13 Rant. . . . . . . . . . --- E Y 14 Ta0/es and licenses. . .I 11 D h . . . . . . t4 U K 15 interest. . . . . . . . . . . . T s 168 Depreciation(rfrsgrared,alfach Form 4511 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 1 S 16 a�- 1 u b Leas deproclatbn reported on Schedule A and alEewilen on return 16bI i 16c N e 17 Depletion(Do not deduct oN and pea depiedon.). . . . . . . . . . . S i 119 Retbement plans,rc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ~ 19 Employee benefit programs . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 T 16 A 20 Otherdaductions I (aftso stafemmx) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 20 _a 21 Total deduceons.Add the WTMM shown in the far ht coiurm for Iirtss 9 thr+otrgh 20. . 21 22 Orclinary business Inconw(lose).Subtract Ane,21!rom the tl lh1d,:perykles d 1 dr,...e're thle I tars aanfrxd this retain,i. . . . . . .' 22 I tdisr,ills true.coned,art co"IM. . 0f '69 tirrted�faduies and statements,and to the best of kcorebdge and P (0Q10rthan eneral my Sign. I which p�has Ialewhe 9 e a 0r �N COr PwV merrlberl B based tri er lnb irwor a Here ► SiYnalw/ of d P~w reMdd FebNy osip/er Se`�R! O wic�1 epi 0��/r�Owen « .. Deer ise/tutsrr Pn�rcfs 0/q 17 Y. F egrarw/ Pnpa Ms SSN a PTN Paid Fre/menus I chWrrb-. . �^ ! Preparees racy -elf-Pre ared -_ Use Only ,,.+•« ,«;. ► IMP once BN • BAA For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act ENodc—a,�xwse-psrate instructions. ane f4 PTFA0113 01M,05 Form 1065(2004) i v E Tv d?} P 4� �a -- r'ITY OF RENTON %wol S. Grady Way vol Renton, WA 98055 OF VE- C" Printed: 09-21-2005 Land Use Actions EP� 2005 RECEIPT IIEC& Permit#: LUA05-114 Payment Made: 09/21/2005 04:29 PM Receipt Number: R0505175 Total Payment: 2,500.00 Payee: The Collegian Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ ------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------- 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check 7300 2,500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ ------------------ ------------------------------ --------------- 3021 303 .000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345 .81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345 .81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00. 0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345 .81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00 .00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42 .1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70 .00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 1 S � PRE-APPLICATION COMMENTS PROJECT Kennydale Business Park 1900 Block of NE 48th St PRE 05-096 Previous pre-applications—Pre 01-062 DATE: July 28,2005 @ 2:00 p.m. STAFF COMMENTS: FIRE PREVENTION—Jim Gray PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES—Jan Illian CONSTRUCTION SERVICES—Craig Burnell- PLANNING/ZONING—Nancy Weil SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: ZONING MAP SITE ARIAL WAIVER SHEET (D4e�'n Y � FIRE DEPARTMENT ' ♦ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 11, 2005 TO: Nancy Weil, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Kenn daley Business Park, 1900 Blke48thSt. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4500 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$64,962.04 is required based on$.52 per square foot of the commercial areas. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler, standpipe and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. 5. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. iAcomm.doc CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW TO: 'Nancy Weil FROM: Jan Illian DATE: July 27, 2005 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS PREAPP NO. 05-096 KENNYDALE BUSINESS PARK Lake Wash Blvd&N.E.48`e Street FNOTEPRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: ng comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this ay be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is a 12-inch water main in NE 480'Street. 2. Applicant will be required to extend the 12-inch water main in NE 48`h Street to the easterly property line. 3. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. One primary hydrant must be located within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within the required distance to the nearest corner of the building. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect"Stortz"fitting if not already installed. 4. Available fire flow is 4,000 gpm. The Fire Department has calculated preliminary fire flow for this project to be 4,500 gpm.Applicant will need to reduce fire flow demand to meet available fire flow. Four hydrants and a 12-inch fire loop system will be required. 12-main will be required to make connection to an existing 8-inch main at the southern property line. See City water drawing W-0575. 5. The proposed project is located in the 320-water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. Static pressure in the area exceeds 100 psi.A pressure reducing valve will be required to be installed at the meter. 6. A Water System Development Charge(SDC) of$0.213 per square foot of gross site area will be apply. 7. If the building exceeds 30 feet in height,a backflow device will be required on the domestic water meter. 8. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of all double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System Kennydale Office Bldg %0001 1400" page 2 will be required". DCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location, installation and standard detail of the backflow assembly inside the building. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is available, however sewer service will be provided by Coal Creek Water and Sewer District.Please call 425-235-9200. 2. Applicant shall provide a Sewer Availability Certificate from Coal Creek at time of site application 3. Applicant proposes underground parking garages. The building department will require floor drains and floor drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, if feasible. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. SURFACE WATER 1. There are existing storm drainage facilities NE 48 Street. 2. A storm drainage plan and drainage report is required. This project drains to Lake Washington. Due to documented downstream flooding in this area, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual -Level I Flow Control for design of both detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces 3. Applicant will be required to submit separate structural plans for review and approval under a building permit for proposed detention vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. 4. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by$0.249. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs and streetlights are required if not already in place. There is no existing sidewalk, curb and gutter fronting the property along NE 48 Street. 2. A traffic study will be required for the SEPA review. The study should include intersection analysis for Lake Wash. Blvd. and NE 48"Street and Lake Wash.Blvd. and NE 44h Street.The analysis should include AM and PM peak hours. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 4• The traffic mitigation fee of$75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by from the ITE trip generation manual. Kennydale Office Bldg page 3 GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards, which are attached for reference. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 4. Separate permits are required for landscape irrigation meter, domestic meter, side sewer and backflow device. CC: Kayren Kittrick MEMORANDUM DATE: /05 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Economic Development, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: LOCATION: —A00 �- PREAPP NO. � A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 2=too , Thursday, 2 , in cne of the 6t'floor conference rooms. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thprough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Plan Reviewer assigned is Mid Please submit your written comments to 'y a'Vl (Planner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. e�or- � d-� � New Cdv\ S�(' Jc Lp oy e' i D C- 200 3 H:1Division.sU)evelop.ser\Dev&Plan.ingUemplateTreapp2 Revised 1-05 C-9 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 2005 TO: Pre-Application File No. 05-096 FROM: Nancy Weil, Senior Planner, 425-430-7270 SUBJECT: Kennydale Business Park Revised General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$50, plus tax,from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on-line at www.ci.renton.wa.us. Project Proposal: The subject site is currently vacant and located on the south side of NE 48th Street (SE 76th Street), east of 1-405. The proposal is to construct two buildings connected in the center by a common core housing the lobby area, totaling approximately 104,871 square feet in gross floor area. The multi-use buildings are proposed as a"stair step"design following the site slope with the main entrance of the buildings on the east elevation. Buildings A proposed at 84,815 square feet,two-story structure with two levels of below grade parking. Building B proposed at 20,056 square feet,two-story structure with one level of sub grade parking under the north end.A total of 413 parking stalls are proposed, including surface and sub-grade stalls. Zoning: The subject site is designated Commercial Arterial (CA)on the City's Zoning Map. The proposed multi-use submitted with the pre-application covered numerous uses listed in the CA allowed uses to include office, retail, trade or vocational school, storage, light manufacturing, entertainment and vehicle related activities. Some of the uses proposed on the site are considered a primary permitted use in this zone. However, other uses proposed would require Hearing Examiner Conditional Use. Storage uses are only permitted as accessory uses and only when in conjunction with permitted service and office uses. In addition, accessory uses are only permitted when incidental to a primary permitted use and when not exceeding 33% of the gross floor area for each individual leasing space. Please refer to the allowed use chart for CA zone included in your packet. At the time of the Land Use Application, disclosure of the proposed uses,the net floor areas for each use, and the appropriate parking ratios and count shall be required. Sensitive Areas: A new Critical Areas Ordinance was adopted May of 2005.Any changes to the code regarding sensitive and protected slopes must be complied with for this site. Based on the City's Slope Atlas,25% to 40% slopes are located on the subject site. The area is also designated as "high"on the City's Erosion Hazard and Slide Hazard Sensitive Areas Maps. In addition,the property appears to contain a stream, which bisects the property within the northern third of the site. Sensitive Area Regulations, which would apply to the subject proposal. All sloped areas exceeding 40% are considered "protected slopes." Such areas are prohibited from land clearing or development. Slopes between 25% and 40% are considered"sensitive slopes"and do not preclude development. 05-096 Kennydale Bus.Park(CA,Slope Stream).doc1 Awe However, additional submittal requirements and studies would be necessary for the appropriate review of the proposal. A watercourse is indicated on the site. Stream Study would be required to verify its classification, per Critical Areas Ordinance adopted May of 2005. The applicant provided a letter from the Department of Fish and Wildlife dated December 17, 2001. This information shall be updated as part of the Stream Study. If it is determined that the watercourse is regulated, applicant shall be required to comply with the code based on the water class. Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CA zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: This project would be required to comply with the new Development Standards adopted in November, 2005 (included in your packet) Lot Coverage The CA zone allows building coverage at a maximum of 65% of the lot area for projects not providing structured parking. Maximum lot coverage of 75% is permitted when structured parking is provided. Setbacks—The CA zone requires a minimum landscaped setback of 10 feet from an arterial street frontage. No minimum rear or side yard setback is required unless abutting or adjacent to a residential zone then a 15-feet is required. This site abuts City of Newcastle to the east, south and portion of the north. These areas appear to be residential thus the 15-foot setback would be required. Height—This is within the CA zone's maximum permitted height of 50 feet. Landscaping/Screening—A Conceptual Landscape plan required. Minimum on-site landscape width of 10 feet is required along the street frontage. If adjacent to or abutting residential zone property, a 15-foot wide sight-obscuring landscape strip or landscaped visual barrier is required.treet setbacks must be landscaped. All landscape areas must be a minimum width of 5 feet and must include underground sprinkler systems. At the time of formal application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes, and types of the proposed planting will be required. All landscape areas are to include an underground sprinkling system unless drought tolerant plantings are used. Please refer to RMC 4-4-070 for general and specific landscape requirements. Several of the specific landscape requirements include: the type and location of trees; soils to be used; drainage; plants; and berms (a copy of the code is included in your packet). Parking lots have specific landscape requirements. Surface parking lots require a minimum amount of landscaping according to the number of parking spaces. There are also landscape requirements for lots abutting public right-of-way and planting requirements. As part of the formal land use application, data on the percentage and square footages-of the parking area that is landscaped must be provided. Please refer to RMC 4-4-080.F.7. All landscaped areas must be a minimum width of 5 feet within the parking areas and include an underground irrigation system. The perimeter landscape strip of the parking area must also be 5 feet in width. Outdoor storage areas, if any, must be screened from adjacent or abutting properties and public rights- of-way. Screening must also be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-09007. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details on the proposed methods of screening. Pedestrian Connection—All development in the CA zone is required to provide a direct and clear pedestrian connection from sidewalks to building entrances. The formal application will need to indicate the location, width, and materials for the required pedestrian walkway on the project site plan. .Parking—The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to specific uses. As the applicant has proposed several possible uses, a parking ratio chart has been included in your packet for reference. 05-096 Kennydale Bus.Park(CA,Slope Stream).doc\ The submitted plans provide a parking analysis for the project showing for office and business storage only. If other uses were proposed the parking information would need to be revised. If the amount of parking proposed falls outside of the range of spaces permitted, an administrative parking code modification would be required as part of the approval process. If a parking modification were necessary, a written justification pursuant to RMC section 4-9-250D would need to be included with the application submittal. Please take note that net floor area is the total of all floor area of a building, excluding stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms, loading and all floor below the ground floor, except when used for human habitation or service to the public. As related to these proposed uses, the areas to be deducted from the overall floor area may also include refrigeration rooms, lobbies, corridors/hallways and restrooms and those accessory areas that are used by the occupant(s). The parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9'x 20'and compact dimensions of 8%2'x 16'. Compact spaces are not allowed to exceed 30%of the required spaces and are required to be marked. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for 90 degree parking stalls. Reduced stall lengths may also be permitted pursuant to RMC section 4-4-080F8c. The proposal appears to comply with the required stall sizes, aisle widths, and provision of ADA accessible stalls. Lighting: The applicant will be required to demonstrate how building, parking lot and any site lighting would not"spill"over into adjacent properties surrounding the subject site.A detailed lighting plan may be requested to be submitted at the time of building permits. SEPA Review: The project would require SEPA review due to the square footage (greater than 4,000 sq.ft.and more than 20 parking spaces)of the development. The proposal would be brought to the Environmental Review Committee for review, as it is their charge to make threshold determinations for environmental checklists. Staff would likely recommend a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated to the Environmental Review Committee. Mitigation of impacts is accomplished through fees related to issues such as transportation and fire. Permit Requirements: The project would require. Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review. These permits would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe oflVto 112weeks. The OU 00 application fee for joint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit ( OOo Site Plan at $1,000.00) and half off any subsequent permits: and % of full fee for SEPA Review ,Q (Environmental Checklist) which is dependent on project value: less than $100,000 is $200.00 (1/2 of $400 full fee) and project value over$100,000 is a$500.00 fee (1/2 of$1,000 full fee). C. The application fee would be $500.00 ($ 9�a (L for the Administrative Site Plan review, and $500.00 for Environmental (SE A) Review). Staff would prepare the notification list and labels for 5&ktr properties within 300 ft. of the site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building, and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. It is also located within Automall Commercial Corridor—Area B. It is the intent of City objectives and policies that Commercial Corridor areas evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities, and boulevard treatment. The proposed site plan generally appears to comply with the following objectives and policies: Objective LU-GGG: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Corridor designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban forms into more concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site planning. 05-096 Kennydale Bus.Park(CA,Slope Stream).doc\ 'err►' - `w'" Policy LU-349. Support development plans incorporating the following features: 9) Share access points and fewer curb cuts; 2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels; 3) Shared parking facilities, 4) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5) Centralized signage; 6) Unified development concepts; and 7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. Policy LU-358. Parking areas should be landscaped(including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along roadways, to reduce visual impact. Additional Comments: It appears the applicant had information prepared for a land use applicantion submittal. The applicant would be required to update the required information as necessary to meet our In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application material for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. .cc: Jennifer Henning 05-096 Kennydale Bus.Park(CA,Slope Stream).doe\ .'. —^:�T-02 05 :31 SEELIG 64 09 4051942 P. 01 ® 1215 114"Ave 8E,Bellevue,WA 98004 ,' GOLDSMITH P.O. Box 3565,Bellevue,WA 98009 8c AS S O C: IAT E S i Off lee(425)462-1080 snee 1956 Engincering • Land Use Planning Survcyui9 FAX(425)462-7719 staff®goldsmlthenglneering.eem Seelig Family Properties September 18,2002 1309 114th SE Suite: 107 Bellevue, WA 98004 Artention: Howard Seelig Re: Renton Property Dear Howard, Pursuant to your request to study the slopes of property that you own in Renton, we have performed a limited boundtuy and topographic survey. This property is known as King County Tax Parcel No.334330 0820. This property is a portion of lot 167 of C.U. Hillman's Lake Washington Carden of Eden No. 3, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Pleats, Page 81, Records of King County Washington. At an initial meeting, you provided us a copy of a drawing entitled Kennydale Business Park(Sheet No. A-1.1) Prepared by CDA Architects Inc. dated 6/12/01 which showed a proposed site plan for the subject property. Also provided at that time was a copy of a topographic survey performed in February 1986 by Eastside Consultants Inc. The aforementioned site plan shows the portion of the property to be developed as the westerly 240 feet of the overall property. We have performed an initial subdivision and boundary evaluation and have detem-Lin W, the configuration of the overall property although we have riot established the property confers in the field. in addition we have inspected and analyzed the steeper (eastern) portion of the site In that area we find that there is a generally westerly sloping topography as shown on the above referenced topographic survey and that the vast majority of the slopes in excess of 40% lie east of the proposed development. The irregular nature of the topography caused by an old road that bisected the property in a northwest/southeast direction and the hummocky nature of the ground topography in areas of existing trees results in areas of greater than 40=/o slope interrupted by areas of less than 40% slope. It is the opinion of the undersigned that the intent of protecting contiguous stccp slopes from development per Renton Municipal code would be met provided that all site activity occurs only in the west 240 feet of the property. If you need any additional information regarding the nature of the service; performed to date or should you wish us to meet with City of Renton pensonnel to discuss the inspection/analysis outlined please do not hcsittalc to call. Very truly yours, 9 C . °14ve-. of ,a GOLDSMITH&ASSOCIATES tecni Jerry zlaff,P. .S Vice President,Surveying ;)2b_"_SL'L•'L?l!�-k-L•341 h.c 1.1>r s(' I'agr I ul I 3 " ' I I_ CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMIT LINE 1 — ' ——————————————---— ————————————— - - — — — — — — —F 634.150- — — — — 1 — — — — — — —l--I I � I 1 I- 1--------------------- ------------- ---------------------------- 1 1 1 �5`l ND"SL7,PiFl�S5T9-ZK'- - ---Jf IS'REAR YARD SETBACK i 11 I I I 1 I I I I I i m Di 1 , Dzr II I i A un, 1 1 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION N NI m I 1 �mI I 57 i Wj '- �Ri «......-�.�veREFUSE/ moi , RECYC.Q I PI PARKING LEVEL - 91 STALLS -r i I II I m ' 1 1 SCREENED MECWANICAL SCREENED MECHANICAL Il 1 F - �= EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT I W c II P3 p �o.e• mBUILDING A WING I BUILDING A , WING 2 -► j ,W ROOF SHOWN ROOF SHOWN j II Iu) 'II ' ;q w—a SCREENED MECHANICAL SCREENED MECHAJICAL «'��� R I 1 C� EQUIPMENT X,I I EQUIPMENT , IJ l�vi1 BUILDING B, WING I BUILDING B, WING 2 `-P4; ROOF SHOWN FUSE/ ROOF SHOWNCyr &RE -► I 1 634.150' COMMERCIAL ZONE Nd s C UL-06-2005 10:09 CITY OF RENTON 425 4JJ 'r2.51 H.02 •4e %-..t .AI. JL X11' JL-%�1 1 i%W �J 1 Planr inglVuik /PublicWbrks Depaitnent Gregg Z mmermon P.E.,Administrator lesm Tanner,Mayor ■w ■ ■a■r � �r October 20, 2003 Howard Seelig 621 Company PO Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 96009 Subject: Kennydale Business Park Dear Mr. Seelig: This letter is written in response to the questions generated from your meeting with City staff last week. I understand your proposal is to construct a 276,942 square foot commercial project;which would provide approximately 112,108 square feet of office space along with 20,296 square feet of warehouse space. There appear to be four major issues that need to be addressed as a result of the meeting and previous correspondence. Those issues include: geotechnical concerns (slope stability), drainage course regulations, wetlands evaluation, and permitted uses within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. Based on the information found within the original pre-application file and the information you provided City staff with last week; the following has been determined: 1. The topography analysis provided by Goldsmith & Associated dated September 18, 2002 provides the location of the steep sloped (40%plus) portions of the property. Specifically, the 40%plus slopes are located approximately within the first 90 feet of the eastern property boundary. Regardless of their location, further geotechnical analysis is required to determine the stability of the slope, with respect to the proposed project. This information should come in the form of a geotechnical report prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer from the state of Washington. This information would need to be included with the formal land use submittal application. 2, According to letter dated December 17, 2001,from Larry Fisher with the Washington Department of F=ish &Wildlife, the drainage course that bisects the property running east/west appears to be a regulated stream. In Mr. Fisher's letter, he refers to the water feature as a stream, He also notes that mitigation is required in order to culvert the stream. Pursuant to City of Renton regulations, any work within 25 feet of a regulated stream would require a variance granted by the City's Hearing Examiner, unless the stream is determined not to be regulated, With that said, i would encourage you to hire a qualified biologist to evaluate the drainage course. The analysis would need to be submitted to the City and should indicate whether or not the drainage course should be regulated pursuant to the City's Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC4-4-130). At this time, the City has no other evidence to release the drainage course from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations. 3. Based on the wetland investigation conducted by Celeste Botha, there do not appear to be any wetlands located within the subject site's boundaries. Based on that analysis, no additional wetland studies would be required as a result of this proposal. Please keep in mind that environmental conditions change over time and staff will �+� 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 REN 1 O ly QD Th(e paper ccnulne 607:roayolOd malaryal,30°h pv5l¢onaun+er AHEAD OF 7H8 GVlkVE J UL-Iib-20b5 "lb;by U 1 1 Y Ur NtN I UN 4GJ 4JlJ fGJl conduct another site visit at the time of the formal land use submittal. If at that time, existing conditions have changed, staff may require further wetlands analysis. 4. Office use is an outright permitted use within the CA zone. However, the proposed warehouse use is not an allowed use unless It is accessory to the office use (i.e. storage area only for the on-site office tenants). Self-service storage is allowed only upon approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, but this would require you to justify the need for that type of use within this area of the City (this may be hard to accomplish as there is an existing self-service storage facility in the immediate vicinity of your project site). I trust this clarifies the Issues discussed with staff last week. I understand that you are looking for predictability with respect to this project, but it appears that some additional environmental analysis may be necessary. Please feel free to contact me at(425) 430- 7286 or Jason Jordan at (425) 430-7219 should you have any comments or questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Jennifer Henning Principal Planner C.C. Craig Burnell Kayren Kittrick Neil Watts TOTAL P.03 C)Et:i= P I RSCHER SEP 2 9 t�'j`_' 1 � ARCHITECTS A R C H I T E C T S I N T E R 1 O R S P L A N N E R S July 5, 2005 City of Renton Development Services Division ATTN: Laureen Nicolay 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 PROJECT. Kennydale Business Park CDA# 99043 SUBJECT. Preapplication Conference Dear Laureen: Thank you for meeting with Howard Seelig and me last week to discuss the Kennydale Business Park Project.As you know, this project has had several previous preapplication conferences and a complete site plan review package was almost submitted the summer of 2004.This project has been placed on the back burner by the ownership,pending improvements in the regional and national economy relating to the construction of new office space. The ownership has decided to proceed with the site plan review, believing that this is an appropriate time to resume active consideration in promotion of this project. I have attached for your review drawings and reports that are in excess of that normally required for a preapplication conference, however, my hope is that these materials will allow a more comprehensive review on the part of city staff than a simple site plan. A brief description of the proposal is as follows: PROJECT NAME,SIZE AND LOCATION: The proposed project, Kennydale Business Park, in Renton, WA, is located at a vacant lot (lot 167),on the South side of NE 48`h Street,east of I-405,west of 11`h PL SE. The City of Newcastle borders the site's south and east boundaries. The lot description is "Lot 167 Hillmans LK WN Garden of Eden #3, and the legal is QSTR SE 29 24 05E. This project lies within the City of Renton Corporate Limits. The site is approximately 4.8 acres. The property directly east of this site is Hemmington Terrace. REQUIRED LAND USE PERMITS: Site Plan Review SEPA Determination ZONING DESIGNATION: CA(Commercial Arterial). CURRENT USE OF SITEXXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: :`,JOBS\99043 henntidalc Business Park\Wp\Ltr to Ltuireen Nicoiay 070505.doc Carl F.Pirscher,AIA principal 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO BOX 55429 Shoreline, Washington 98155 Tel: (206)-368-9668 Fax:(206)-368-9558 Site is vacant. SPECIAL SITE FEATURES: The site has a gradual upward slope of 30% from west to east across the entire length of the property, with a slight slope in the north/south direction. The site has various eastern areas that have been mapped at 40%. An existing seasonal drainage course gully was observed on the property. Seasonal water enters the property through a 12 inch concrete pipe tight line from a residential development at the eastern property line. A drainage swale conducts occasional surface water flows across the site generally in an east to westerly direction approximately bisecting the north half of the property. This drainage channel has been determined to be a drainage ditch that does not qualify as a "stream" or "creek" and is not subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations. The flows do not support any fisheries upstream of the outfall into Lake Washington. SOIL TYPE,DRAINAGE CONDITIONS,AND PROPOSED OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS• Please refer to soils analysis prepared by GEO Group Northwest,Inc. included in this submittal. Please refer to SEPA application for all drainage conditions. Please refer to Grading and Drainage Plan included in this submittal. PROPOSED USE AND SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Architectural Context The proposed project consists of the construction of two stepped multi-story multi-use buildings, totaling approximately 123,604 SF of occupied space. The project is divided into two buildings connected in the center by a common core that includes the lobby, elevators, and exit stair components. The buildings were designed to stair step down the slope gradient of the site. Building A, at 84,670 square feet, is located at the uppermost section of build-able area. Building A is a two story structure on two levels of below grade parking. Building B is located down-slope from Building A. Building B consists of two stories at 38,934 SF with one wing located over one level of sub-grade parking. Stepping the structures with the slope of the site will decrease the apparent building volume to properties to the east yet allow for dramatic views from the structures in a westerly direction that will include Lake Washington and Mercer Island. An approximately 85'-7" wide buffer will be maintained along the easterly property line separating the developed area associated with this project from the residential areas located to the east. The buffer will largely retain the existing natural landscape growth it currently enjoys. In addition,the placement of the buildings at a significantly lower elevation than that associated with the residential development to the east will ensure that the roof elevations of the proposed structures are below the natural grade elevations along the easterly property line thus minimizing potential view obstructions for the adjoining residences(please see attached site section drawings). F:UOBS!99043 Kennydaie Business 11ark`AVp4..tr to L.aureen Nicoiay 07050;.doc Carl F.Pirscher,AIA principal 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO BOX 55429 Shoreline, Washington 98155 Tel: (206)-368-9668 Fax:(206)-368-9558 NOW Provisions for convenience and employee parking are ample for the type of occupancies envisioned for this project; however, to minimize the appearance and impacts of large blocks of surface parking, much of the parking developed for this project is located below the occupied building structures. This allows for much greater areas of the site to be retained for buffer and landscaping purposes. A total of 409 parking spaces will be provided with most of them hidden from view. Primary building materials will consist of site cast architectural concrete, steel and glass window wall systems and expressed steel structural components. Materials and finishes will be high quality evocative of the professional commercial and business environment this project wishes to convey to prospective tenants. Building A is an 84,670 SF two-story professional office building with two levels of sub-grade parking. Building B is a 38,934 SF single story professional office building above one level of garage. The proposed offices and parking garages may be constructed of tilt-up concrete and steel framing. All structures will be fully sprinklered. A continuous driveway through the site ties the upper and lower parking areas and provides fire truck access. Please refer to sheet A-0.1 for additional project data. Anticipated Building Occupancies This project will be marketed primarily to business and commercial tenants of small to moderate size that provide services largely to the east Lake Washington areas and larger Puget Sound region. This may include such tenants as engineering and architectural firms, legal and accounting firms and other General Office categories.It will also include Service Office tenants such clinics, dental practices and other health care providers. The buildings have been sited and arranged to also provide for a wide range of Neighborhood Service tenants such as hair solons, drycleaners and tailoring. It is also anticipated that some portion of the project will be devoted to Neighborhood Businesses such as coffee shops, small to moderate size dining establishments, take out food shops, veterinary clinics. School uses including trade or vocational schools could take advantage of the flexible interior spaces and the ample parking. Community and Public Facilities such as religious institutions and services, social organizations, city government facilities and other government office and facilities may take advantage of the easy access as well as the flexible parking. Business accessory and self-service Storage may be included in Building B with its quick access from the parking levels and the lower drive. A variety of general Industrial uses in the light manufacturing and fabrication category would work well in Building B with its concrete construction, high ceiling heights and accessibility. Retail tenants including eating and drinking establishments, retail sales (indoor and outdoor), taverns and horticultural nurseries could work well in the proposed project. Accessory uses including drive-in/drive- through retail may benefit from the efficient vehicle circulation. The proposed project provides opportunities for Entertainment and Recreation. These uses may include gaming and gambling facilities(not for profit)and indoor/outdoor recreation. The effective balance of abundant parking circulation would grant prospects for Vehicle Related Activities such as body shops, car washes, commercial or public parking garages and small vehicle service and repair shops. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerelf, CDA +PIRSCHER ARCHITECTS,INC. F`J(_)B,>%99043 i:ermr:da!e Business 11wk'•.WpA_n-to Luumen Nicoiay 070505.joc Carl F.Pirscher,AIA principal 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO BOX 55419 Shoreline, Washington 98155 Tel: (206)-368-9668 Fax:(206)-368-9558 Carl F.Pirscher A.I.A. President 1:`JOB'YO90,3 Ker,chic?3usines Park\'Vp' -tr to L.aoreen Nicoiay 07,0505.doc Carl F.Pirscher,AIA principal 19500 Ballinger Way NE Suite 200 PO BOX 55429 Shoreline, Washington 98/55 Tel: (206)-368-9668 Fax:(206)-368-9558 SEP ') City Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST z ' Page 1 of 10 A. BACKGROUND �*° 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Kennydale Business Park 2. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant/Owner: 621 Company Contact: Bryan Borchers PO Box 1925, Bellevue,WA 98009 CDA Architects, Inc. (425)451-8203 Seattle,WA 98155 (206)368-9668 3. Date checklist prepared: August 24,2005 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 5. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing), if applicable: Construction will begin as soon as applicable permits and financing are approved. Estimated start of construction is 2006. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain: Only tenant improvements. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,directly related to this proposal. This SEPA Checklist—CDA Architects, Inc.,August 24,2005 Soils Analysis—GEO Group Northwest, Inc.,August 3,2001 Drainage Report for Fisheries Conditions—Poggemeyer Design Group,June 14,2000 Traffic Analysis—William Popp Associates,October,2001 Stream Analysis—Associated Earth Sciences, Inc October 11,2000 Wetlands Report—Celeste Botha- 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. None known 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Mechanical Permit Plumbing Permit Electrical Permit Clearing/Grading Permit R.O.W. Permit 10. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.): The project consists of two multi-story office buildings,with sub-grade parking for 409 stalls. The two buildings are connected in the center by a common core housing the lobby,elevators and exit stairs. Building A is an 84,670 SF two-story professional office building with two levels of sub-grade parking. Building B is a 38,934 SF two-story professional office and accessory business storage building with one level of garage parking below. The office uses total 103,547 SF.Accessory business storage totals 20,057 SF.The site is approximately 4.8 acres and is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 2 of 10 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist: The project is located on the south side of NE 48th Street,east of 1-405,west of 111`h PI SE. The City of Newcastle borders the site's south and east boundaries. The lot description is"Lot 167 Hillmans LK WN Garden of Eden#3", and the legal is QSTR SE 29 24 05E. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH A. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, ham, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Describe location and areas on the site that have different topography. The site has a gradual average upward slope of 30% from west to east across the entire length of the property,with a slight slope in the north/south direction. B. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?Describe location and areas of different topography. According to the City's Slope Atlas there are several small areas of approximately 30-40% slope at the eastern side f the C. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification for agricultural soils,specify them and note any private farmland. Based on the subsurface explorations previously conducted,the site appears to be underlain with lacustrine (lake deposited) silty clays with some interbedded lenses of dense sand. Some surficial fill soils are present in the western portion of the site. D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?if so,describe. Portions of the property are designated as "high"on the City's Erosion Hazard and Slide Hazard Critical Areas Maps. E. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Site grading will be required to create level benches for parking and building pads. Excavated material will be approximately 18,000 cy. Compacted fills will be about 9,000 cy. Surplus material will be about 9,000 cy. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so generally describe. Some erosion may occur during construction,such as surface run-off during a rainstorm. All such erosion will be controlled on site. A temporary erosion sediment control(T.E.S.C.)plan will be a part of the permit and construction drawings. G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 62%. H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: +rrn' City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 3 of 10 We will have a temporary erosion sediment control plan which will meet the city's requirements. 2. AIR A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short-term emissions are expected to consist of truck and construction equipment exhaust and dust generated during construction. Long-term emissions will be generated by customer and employee vehicles. B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. Primary off-site emissions will be from NE 481h St. but this will not affect our proposal. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Vegetation buffers will surround the entire site. This buffer will help minimize off-site impacts of airborne particles. Also, the general contractor will use dust control measures during construction. 3. WATER A. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Provide a sketch if not shown on site plans. An existing gully was observed 4r.the property.-Water enters the property thr�u a 12 inch concrete pipe tightline. This surface water feature, which bisects ,the north end of the site has been determined to be a drainage ditch that does not qualify as a "stream" or "creek" and is not subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations. The flows do not support any fisheries upstream of the outfall into Lake Washington per "Drainage Report for Fisheries Condition" prepared by Poggemeyer Design Group. 2. Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Note approximate distance between surface water and any construction fill,etc. Surface water enters the site as sheet flow and discharges from a concrete culvert. This inflow will be intercepted by an intercept swale along the undeveloped portion of the site. The sheet flow and channel flow will be conveyed via storm sewer system on site and combined with on—site drainage. The storm drainage will be treated for water quality. The on-site component of storm drainage will be attenuated by on-site detention to moderate the discharge rate to a pre-developed discharge rate in accordance with City of Renton (King County Surface Water Design Manual)runoff time series analysis. The surface water will be handled in accordance with Best Management Practices for erosion and sedimentation control during construction. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water orwetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material,if from on site. No standing water exists on the site, nor any wetland. The site has an average 20%slope from east to west. Excavated material may be used in compacted fills on site to create level benches for parking lots and building floor pads. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No dewatering or ground water impacts are expected. The area is primarily compact glacial till with shallow forest litter. The excavations are not expected to impact water supply sources or to increase ground water supply. City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 4 of 10 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,on the location on the site plan. No.The proposed site is not within a 100 year flood plain. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. The site will be serviced to sanitary sewer in accordance with city standards and connected to an existing sanitary sewer collection system. B. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. Yes. We propose that storm water will be collected, conveyed and treated per local standards. Infiltration may be used. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be serviced(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff(including Stormwater): 1. Describe the source(s) of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection, trans port/conveyance and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Preliminary analysis of the upstream and downstream impacts have been determined. The site is within the Gypsy Basin. The upstream limit is approximately 200'east of 116t"Avenue SE. The tributary sheds runoff to the west crossing 116"Avenue SE. Sheet flow, channel flow, and subdivision drainage collection systems convey the runoff primarily due west to the east boundary of the site. The offsite basin contains approximately 25.2 acres. Surface water enters the site as sheet flow, and discharges from a concrete culvert. The inflow will be intercepted by an intercept swale along the undeveloped portion of the site. The sheet flow and channel flow will be conveyed via storm sewer system on site and combined with on-site drainage. The storm drainage will be treated for water quality. The on-site component of storm drainage will be attenuated by on-site detention to moderate the discharge rate to a pre-developed discharge rate in accordance with the City of Renton (King County Surface Water Design Manual) runoff time series analysis. The surface water will handled in accordance with Best Management Practices for erosion and sedimentation control during construction. The site discharge flow control structure will be divided proportional to existing flow conditions and discharged to the two existing intake structures on the east side of the property as follows: 1. Intake from concrete flume at northeast corner of Shurgard Storage site. 2. Intake from concrete flume collecting runoff from subject property and located along the east perimeter of the motel parking lot(abutting property south of Shurgard Storage site.) These site discharge collection points serve the subject property and the systems have been installed as engineered systems with the permitted commercial developments. City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 5 of 10 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There is a potential for waste materials to enter the ground water from within the development;pollutants from automobiles,roadways,driveways and parking areas. The above measure listed in Section C.1 above will help to reduce or eliminate this possibility. Also, we will provide floor drains in the parking garage areas to be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, if feasible. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Sub surface drainage blankets will be installed in conjunction with retaining walls on site to create the level parking areas and building pads. These drains relieve hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining walls. Parking areas will be curbed and sheet flowed to catch basins. The catch basins will be conveyed to water quality treatment facilities in accordance with City Standards. Site runoff will be piped into the existing underground collection systems offsite to eliminate surface flows and the risk of overflowing the concrete flumes that presently collect surface water as sheet/channel flow. 4. PLANTS A. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree:alder, maple,aspen,other X evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants;water lily, eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation (please list) B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Sparse patches of grass,shrubs and trees will be removed from the site during construction, mainly in the new areas of asphalt and buildings. We will try to preserve all trees and vegetation just east of the easterly limits our east parking lot,and any existing trees within new landscaping areas. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. D. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: We will provide landscaping in all areas not covered by the building and adjacent paving.A landscape plan will be submitted as part of the site plan application drawings. 5. ANIMALS A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk heron eagle songbirds other: mammals: deer bear elk beaver other: rodents B. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 6 of 10 C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Do not know. D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The installation of new landscaping in designated areas and the preservation of existing vegetation along the eastern portion of the property. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES A. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Gas for heating, electricity for cooling. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? f so,generally describe. No. C. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The project will meet or exceed the State of Washington's Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police,fire and emergency medical services may be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Sanitary and storm water drainage systems will meet or exceed local requirements. B. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Vehicular traffic from NE 48`h St.and Interstate 405 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise will come from construction activity between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays only. Long-term noise will come from an increase in traffic between approximately 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The proposed heliport would create long-term noise but the duration of the noise would not last long. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Construction noise will be temporary and limited to certain hours. The heliport would be operational only during business hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The adjacent properties to the south and east fall within the City of Newcastle limits and are zoned residential. The properties to the north and west are zoned commercial. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. City of Newcastle ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 7 of 10 C. Describe any structures on the site. None are on site. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Arterial (CA) F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area—Commercial (EAC) G. If applicable,what is the Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? This site is not subject to the City's Shoreline Master Program and does not have a Shoreline designation. H. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. (If unsure,check with the City.) Yes,based on the City's Slope Atlas,there are slopes present on the east side of the subject site,and this area is also designated as"high"on the City's Erosion Hazard and Slide Hazard Critical Areas Maps. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Reside: None Work: Approximately 200 employees J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed development will comply with existing zoning regulations. 9. HOUSING A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None. B. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Height will vary between 30'to 50' but will not exceed 50',which is the maximum allowed height for this zone. Building materials will most likely consist of concrete, steel, and decorative metal work. B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Only territorial views. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed project will meet all local height and set back requirements and will incorporate architectural features and color to present an aesthetically pleasing development. Proposed rrr+ NOW City of Newcastle ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 8 of 10 project will meet the City of Renton's design and landscaping standards. Also,because the Comprehensive Plan of the site(Employment Area)classifies the property as a gateway to the city,the applicant will enhance the western facades of the structures using"creative and sensitive"design features. Retaining a large portion of the existing vegetation and locating the majority of the parking below grade will soften the visual impact of the proposed project. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. Light from the parking lot and vehicular traffic will occur between dusk and dawn. Light from building lighting would occur during business hours in the early to late evening. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Parking lot lighting will be designed to focus only on the proposed site by the use of cut-off diffusers. Also, light levels will be per current energy code allowances. 12. RECREATION A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The only recreational areas are as follows: Gene Coulon Memorial Park is located approximately 2.9 miles from this site. Newcastle Beach Park is located approximately 3 miles from this site. Park&Ride Bus Stop is approximately 2.3 miles from this site. B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. Do not know. B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Do not know. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Do not know. 14. TRANSPORTATION A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plan,if any. Access to the site will be from NE 48th ST which connects to Lake Washington Blvd.NE and SE 76`h St. See attached site plan and vicinity maps. err+ City of Newcastle ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 9 of 10 B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The applicant does not believe that the site is served by bus stops closer than the Park& Ride Bus Stop which is approximately 2.3 miles from this site. C. How any parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will add 398 new stalls. None eliminated. D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No new roads. NE 48`h St.frontage improvements adjacent to the north edge of this property will be provided. Frontage improvements will include 2 new driveways and curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and landscaping. E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. Train tracks run parallel to Lake Washington Blvd. N. No public train station is located near this property. F. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. AM&PM. How many of these trips occur in the AM peak hours? 163 How many of these trips occur in the PM peak hours? 156 There will be approximately 1,155 daily trips (without TDM credits) G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The public will access this site at points approved by the city. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will increase the demand for fire and police protection for the new buildings, customers and employees. B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. All Safety and Code Regulations will be met or exceeded. 16. UTILITIES A. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity natural gas water refuse service telephone sanitary sewer septic system other B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Gas: Washington Natural Gas Telephone QWest Power: Puget Sound Energy Water: Coal Creek Utility District. An existing 12"dia waterline is located in NE 48`h St.and along the western property line. San. &Storm Sewer: San. Sewer will be provided by Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. There is an existing 12" dia. sanitary sewer along the western property line of the proposed project. City of Newcastle ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 10 of 10 17. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Relationship of signer to project: Associate with CDA Architects, Inc. F:\JOBS\99043 Kennydale Business Park\Wp\SEPA\SEPA81001.doc U � L f a ` r—vELOPMENTSERVICES DIVISION .j WAIVER C " SUBMITTAL REQUIREIVNTS SEP,' FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONSniwc� LAND USE PERMtTUBM[TTAL WAIVED MODIFIED► REQUIREME!\tTS B;lf . BY COMMENTS Calculations, Cblored Ivlaps for,DlspIay,, _ '> ' Construction Mitigation Description z AND a Density VCorksheet a `'� Drainage Control Plan z Drainage Report z Elevations, Architectura13AND4 Environmental CfeeklEst a Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)a Exr$tmg Easements(Recorded Cop )a;; ' Flood Hazard Data a Floor Plans Geotechnical Report2MD3 Grading Plan,Canceptuafa Grading Plan, Detailed Habitat Date Report 4 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site a Landscape Plan, COP cep#uala Landscape Plan, Detailed a LegaE Description a List of Surrounding Property Owners a Mailing Labels for Pro a .wnets 4XX p rtY Map of Existing Site Conditions a Master Application Foim a :; Monument Cards (one per monument) , 4eighb6rh66d Detail:Map 4 phis requirement may be waived by: Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: !. Public Works Plan Review Section I. Building Section DATE:* I t Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls m19oi9nnr .. ` t o ` a MO , t a s E logy . Phone : ( 206 ) 328 - 7775 Fax : ( 2 0 6 ) 328 - 7779 Email : cbotha@cablespead . com November 29, 2001 Howard Seelig Seelig Properties P.O. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Wetland Investigation of Property Located East of Lake Washington Blvd. SE,North of NE 44`h Street, City of Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Seelig: At your request,I conducted a wetland investigation on your property in Renton,Washington (Section 29,Township 24 North,Range 5 East)on November 27,2001.The objective of the investigation was to determine whether or not the channel cutting from east to west through the site has any associated wetlands,as defined in the Washington Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(Ecology 1997)(which describes the 1987 Corps ofEngineers wetland identification methodology),as required by the City of Renton Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO). The manual requires the examination of characteristics and indicators ofhydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils,and wetland hydrology. Positive indicators of all three characteristics must normally be present to make a positive wetland determination.The study area of this investigation was confined to the vicinity of the channel. The site is on a hillside sloping down towards the west.The channel is incised and water was flowing briskly on the date of the site visit,during a period of heavy rainfall. The banks of the channel,as well as the balance of the site,is comprised of a deciduous forested plant community dominated in the overstory by red alder(Alnus rubra). Black cottonwood(Populus balsamifera),big-leaf maple(Acer macrophyllum), and choke cherry(Prwms marginate)are also present in the overstory in trace amounts. The understory is nearly monotypic Himalayan blackberry(Rebus procerus),though some salmonberry is also present.The groundlayer,where present mostly along the toe of the slope,is comprised of Pacific blackberry(Rubus ursinus), sword fern(Polystichum munitum),brackenfern(Pteridium aquilinwn),salal(Gaultheria shallon),Oregon grape(Mahonia aquifolia), and English ivy(Hedera helix). This is a non- hydrophytic plant community. i i t 2025 S. Norman Street I Seattle, WA 98144 i z 'd E028- ISb (SZbI s9t4J0d0Jd 911aeS dEb :zO i0 02 Dag Page 2 of 2 November 29,2001 1 Seelig Renton Property Soils on the site are mapped in the Soil Survey of King County Area as Kitsap silt loam 8 to 15% slope and Kitsap sil loam 15 to 30%slopes. The Kitsap series is a very deep,moderately well drained soil on terrace escarpments. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown silt loam about 6 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil is dark brown silt loam about 14 inches thick The lower part is olive brown silty clay loam about 13 inches thick Permeability of the Kitsap soil is slow; available water capacity is high.Effective rooting depth is limited by a seasonal perched wafter table that is at a depth of 18 to 30 inches from December to May. Seep areas or springs are common. The Kitsap series is a non-hydric soil (S.C.S., 1985). Exposed soil along the incised channel matched the soil description. In summary,none of the three wetland criteria,hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,or wetlands hydrology,are met within the study area on the subject site. Thank you for using the services of Celeste Botha Wetlands Ecology on this project. I would be happy to meet with someone from the City of Renton to conduct a site verification visit if necessary. To arrange a meeting time, or with any questions,please call(206)328-7775. Sincerely, Celeste Botha a •d cn�o_ Tc4., r["7L, CO T1 io.J- 9 —=ry 07/05/2005 22:28 4257463980 PAGE 02 #j&TAI� taw State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 OMM: 1601 a M111 Creek Boulevard-MIN Creek,Wsshin&n 99412-(425)775-1311 December 17,2001 Howard Seelig Post Office Box 1925 Bellevue, Washington 98009 Dear lbfn-Scxlig: SUBJECT: Lot 167,H111man's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition No.3, Unnamed Creek, Tributary to Lake Washington,King County, WRIA 08.LKWA The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)has been fortunate to have an* opportunity to work with you regarding the small streams which flows through the above_ referenced property you own in the City of Renton. WDFW has accepted 12 coniferous trees,primarily western red.cedar, with a minimum diameter at breast height of 20 inches as mitigation for placing this stream in a culvert when the property is developed. These trees have already been delivered to a storage area operated by the King County Department of Natural Resources, which intends to use them sometime in 2002 in a fish habitat restoration project in Peterson Creels,tributary to the Cedar River, in Maple Valley. Array Stonkus is the manager of this project and can be reached at 206-296-8385. You or your successor property owner can work with Tony Oppermann of WDFW to obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval when the property is developed. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this mitigation. If you have any questions please contact me at 425-649-7042 or Tony Opperimann at 425-379-2309. Sincerely, Larry Fisher Area Habitat Biologist LF:lf SEELIG.G cc: WDFW, Oppermann KCDNR, Stonkus City of Renton, Nishihim 08/22/2005 17.04 4257463980 PAGE 03 voi ccs �CJClJ in.an v6DM31tStU3 S;LLLIU F'KUt LN I Ab CAU— 01 Associated Earth Sclencex, Inc. October 11, 2000 Howard.Seelig P-0. Sox 1925 Bellevue, Washington 98009 SU'j"t: Fiaheriea value of drainage on proParty—P+"of the Gypsy Subbesin Draimge Propwsed Kemtydale ausinm Park Renton;, Washington Dear Mr. Seelig, I have completed a salmonid suitability and ftwctional habitat Messmcut of a drainage on your undeveloped 4.57-acre property located in the 1800 block of NE 48th Street in Renton,. W.39hington (Figure 1), It is the understanding of Associated Earth Sciences Itc. (AEST) the drainage on the property is proposed to be tightlined for its length on the site as part of the PrON'Od Kenndydale Business Park. Thi, latter roport as bean prepared in response to the City of Renton's request for an indepen'cent consultant to assess the existing condition of, the subject drainage. The objective of the assessment was to evaluate general salmonid habitat suitability on the property, if any, and auy functional value the drainage may provide to the downstream fisheries resource. You indicated Leery Fischer of WDFW assessed the site and determined the drainage does not support salmonids at any time of the, year. My site survey and review of existing literature supports that assessment. As described below, the scream is contained in a series of pipes UPstrem and downstream, of the subject property. In addition, the out nature of the banks and conveyance of flow on the property via a concrete pipe with no evidence of a defined channel uPitmdient suggest the channel is not natm ll. METHODS On September 11, 2000,the subject drainage was walked foar its aPProxinatcly 330-;foot length on the property where vegetation permitted. The drainage also was assessed upstream and downstream of the property for a distance of approximately 500 feet in meta direL_tion. Photographs were takers of features of interest and are on file at Associated Earth Sciences in Kirkland, Washington. Fisheries habitat quality was assessed based on channel type, channel complexity, substrate, channel stability, evidence of flows upsac„am passage barriers, targe woody debris (LWD)or any other features of benefit to salmonids. Any functional valine provided by the subject drainage to the dowamroam, fisheries resource was based on the existing riparian eonditiort on the property; The riparian area was evaluated for bank stability, shade, organic nutrient delivery, course sediment delivery, LW'D, and filtering of pollutants. Published ,xcientific �researeh on riparian functions supporting fish habitat was used in this analysis(Knutson and Naef 1997). COeWM 01k*•411 F Ah Awinw.Sure 100•Kirk4nd-WDA 490"33•Pllerw 425 li7-7701 .Rax 42S 827-5414 West Sewed CAC&, 179 Madrona Lana`forth•Sambre,Islan&NA 99110 4 MWe 106 730.9370•Fax W6 7861k ]I .98/22/2005 17:04 4257463980 PAGE 04 08/22/2005 16:30 4254518243 SEELIG PPOPERTIES PAGE 02 RESULTS Ile ori& f the drama on the property is a 12-inch concrete pipe located along the eastern l teary pipe is perched approximately 12-inches above a channel lined with quarry s*ls• For the first approximately 70 feet, the drrsirtage is contained within a defined channel with an approximately 40 percent gradient. For the reminder of the drainage length On the property, the gradient is gentler at about 3 percent- Riparian vegetation was dominated by HiMalayan blutckbarry (Rebus discolor), iMatature red alder (Alnus rubra) and scattered willow(Salix,spp). During the site visit, flow was about 0.05 cubic feet per second(cfs). Average channel width at the ordinary high water mark(QHWM)was approximately 2.5 feet. Average wetted width was about I foot. The drainage averaged 3 Feet at the bwikfWl width. Average bartltfttll depth Averaged 2 feet with a range between about 0.3 feet and 5 feet- 13 were Mostly silt and generally uAstsble, Erosion was occurring along the batiks for the majority of the approximately 330 foot length of the drainage on the property, The channel bed was dominated by silt. Charnel type was riffle. No pools,gravel suitable for salmonid spawning, Ime woody debris or other features of benefit to salmonids were observed. The drairtatge exits the property at the western property boundary. The flow empties into a smooth concrete flume measuring I foot wide and 0.5 feet deep. This feature nuns north to south on the adjacent property (Shurguard). For its approximately 300 foot length, the concrete flume is mostly covered by teed canary grass. The gradient was estimated to be about 1 Percent. The water then drops into a storrudrain pipe beneath a parking lot (Traveler's Inn). T11e flow then passes through approximately 500 feet of pipe before daylighting in a stormwater quality detention pond. The pond is located along the eat shoulder of Lake W&Shingtou Blvd SE and the access road to Traveler's Inn, Vegetation surrourvEng the pond is dominated by cattail (1}pha lat{folia), willow, and reed canary grass ghalarfs ar undinacea). Water fmm the pond then exits beneath,Lake Washington Boulevard via a 48-inch culvert and Continues under I-405 and railroad tracks eventually emptying into Lake Washington. Drainage studies in this vicinity indicate this drainage is pare of the Gypsy Subbasin drainage (not to be confused with Gypsy Creek which is a nearby tributary to May Creek). The majority of tbt watercourse downstrcum of the subject property is contained within pipes (Entranco 1995). No evidence of a natural drainage was located upstream of the site. Therefore, salmonid use upstream of the drainage is non-existent, It appears the origin of the water is a series of stormwater catchbasins collecting surfaeewatcr runoff from SE 76ei Stmet and 111 dh place SF. A natural spring may also contribute to the flow(poggenmeyer 2000). According to Renton Municipal Code (RMC) (4.11-030), creeks are defined as "those areas where,Turf lce mater flows sufficiently to produeg a defined channel or bed A defined channel or beef is indicated by hydraulically sorted sediments or the removal of vegetative litter or loosely rooted vegetation by the action of moving water. The channel or bed need nor contain water year-round. Afs definition is not meant to Include stormwater OlunofJ'devices or other 2 '08/22/2005 17:04 4257463980 PAGE 05 vu;«;curt , arJ, �u -r�oH�ar`c1.3 SttLll� 1'htJFtht HAUE 0,,9 *ago, "We "tirely arriffclal wwtarcOurs'ts unless they are umd to store a &,,,r convey pass-through ,stream flows naturally occurring prior to Construction of such devices. Therefore, the series of stormdrains above the site would not be clusifiied as a creek. Although the drainage ora the Property is contsined within a defined channel and contains some of the ebamcteris6c5 of a natu'al stream, it is simply the result of a srknmwater pipe release onto the propel+ 51nCt dere 3 no evidence a natwal stream waS punt prior to the construction of the i the drainage on the property mould not be classified as 4 creek according to the RMC. p Pe. Mover, the subject drainage does not offer any direct value to fisheries. salmonids caawx assess the site. salmonid passage from downstream waren is erfremely unlikely given the considerable distance between the stormwater pond and the stream on the subject property. A salmonid could not negotiate the series of Underground pipes, vertical elevation between the underground pipe and storm drain grate, and,a narrow concrete chute to enter the property. In addition, the subject drainage is generally devoid of conditions supportive of salmonids. The habitat type is a homogenous riffle, No pools were observed. No gravels suitable for spawning were observed. No LWD or other features of benefit to salmonids were observed. In cortclusio:k, if the op-site drainage flow was placed in a pipe, it would result in mo direct loss of'fisheries habitat. 71e dminago on the property was assessed for fbactional value in the form of providing bank stability, shade, organic nutrient delivery, course sediment delivery, large woody debris,and filtering of pollutants that could benefit downstream fish habitat In my opinion, Placing the drainage in a pipe would not significantly alter the value of the Gypsy Creek 3ubbasin drainage dtiwnstam. The reasons for that conclusion are provided below. Hank stabfBty In general, the roots from woody vegetation along and near natural streams help stabilize soils and reduce erosion. On this site the riparian vegetation is dominated by Himalayan blackberry with scattered willow and immature red alder and occasional big leaf maple (Acer tnacropyllum). The relatively shallow root systems of the majority of the riparian vegetation does not provide much bank stability. In fact, the existing unstable silt banks found along the majority of the channel on the property contribute fine sediment. In tom, the transportation of suspended sediment may be deleterious for fisheries downstream because fine sediment generally reduces salmonid spawning quality. Tightlining the creek could result in less sediment tzw"rted dowustrea m and slightly improve the general condition of fisheries downstream. However, it should be noted that the majority of this sediment would be trapped in the pond located downstream. 08/22/2005 17:04 4257463980 PAGE 06 U8/12, 2005 16:30 4254518203 SEELIG PROPERTIES PAC5E 04 `wry+" Shade Canopy cover along natural streams a festa water quality by preventing an influx of solar radiation and a resultant increw in water temperature(Beschta tt. al, 1987; Sullivan et. al, 1994). The elimination of shade and subsequem increased tesmperust vft MAY alter salmonid MdUction, metabolism, growth, survival, behavior and habitat utilization. Under she mdsting conditions, Shade of the subject drainage is mostly provided by overhanging Himalayan blackberry. Tightiining the stream is not expected to Significantly alter the water trmperat uc delivered to downstream waters. Organic Nutrient Delivery Vegetation and plant material falling into nabual stream contribute to the aquatic ecosystem food chain. Additionally, tete particulate matter delivered directly or indirectly provides nutrients for organisms which eventually at"Sy pray for fish, T o drainage currently contributes some organic material to the downstream system but it likely is intercepted its the stormdrain and detention pond downstream, Therefore, tightlining the drainage on the property would have no or very little impact to organic nutrient delivery downstream. Large Woody Debris(LWD) Large woody debris in a natural stream system provides charmel structure, helps trap and stabilize coarse gravel deposits, and provides scour which develops pwls. LWD also provides overhead and stream velocity cover for fish and influences stream bank characteristics(Bisson et, al 1987;Bewhta et al. 1987;Bilby aid Ward 1991). The drainage is not of sufficient size or energy to capture trees or move the material downstream. Furthermore, stornuh*rs preclude the transfer of LWD downstream, any woody n=trial would be captured in the pond located downstream of the property, and much of the of Gypsy Subbasin Drsiwge is in pipes(,F�ttUMco 1995). Therefore,no change to LWD from tightlining the stream on the property is expected. Pollutant Filtration Undisturbed riparian buffers in natural strearns intercept sediment and nutrients, and help improve water quality of runoff from the adjacent landscape. Additionally, as surtece flow Percolates through the riparian area,vegetation and soils filter and biodegrade organic debris and environmental pollutants. Tightlining the drainage will eliminate this functional value in the drainage. However, this drainage was created as a conveyance route for street runoff and nearly all water passing through it enters Arom the upstream culvert, not from the site. Therefore no water quality dif rience would result from tightlining the drainage. 4 "08/22/2005 17:04 4257463980 PAGE 07 08/22/2005 .15-313 4254518201 5EELIii PRUPERTIE: PAGE 05 SUMl1�A►RY In sv3n1n 'Y, the drainne on the p wpeny is W=itables for salmonids and no salmonids are axpeated to be found on the paoperq at any time of the year Under&ny flaw condition. No significant direct or indirect impact to fisheriea on site or within the (gypsy Creek Subbasin Iarainage; would result from from tlghd ming this draitutge. This drainage would not be claasiile d as a creek according to City of Renton Code. Please f6el g'ee to contact me with questions or for further uscistanae. SinaGrnlY► ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES INC. Kirkland.Washington Michele McGrady Senior Staff Biologist ,68/22/2005 17: 04 4257463980 PAGE 08 IJ8/Y21201dp Ib: 40 4154b18203 SEEING PRUPERUES PAGE 06 REFERENCES Beachta, RL., Bilby, R.E., grown, G.W., Holtby, L.B., and T.D. Hofer. 1987. Stream ten4wat.'ara and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In Salo,E.O. sxrd T.'4V, Cuondy [eds.] Streanvide Maoagemvnt: Forestry and Fishery Tn'teractions. University of Washington, College of Forest Resources,Seattle, Washington. 471p. Bilby, R.E. and J.W. Ward. 1991. Cb3nWteristies and function of large woody debris in streams draining old growth, cicar-cm, and seed growth forests of southwestern Washington Can,I of Fish.Aquatt. Sci,,48:1-10, Bison, P.A., R.E. Bilby, M.D. )tyrant, C.A. Do11off, Q.B, Grette, R.A. House, M.L. Murphy, K.V. Koski and J.R. Sedell. 1987, p. 87-94. In Salo, E.O. mid T.W. Cundy feds.] Strcamside Mwgernent: Forestry and Fishery Xnteraotions. University of Washington, College of Forest Resources,Scattle, Washington. 471p. Knutson, K.L. and V.L. Naef. 1997, Management recommendations for W Wn's priority habitats: riparian. Washington DepWftent of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA. 181p. Poggenmeyer Design Group. 2000. Drainage for Fisheries Condition Report, Kennydala Business Park,Renton, Washington. June 7,2000. 2 pp. EAtranco. 1995. Gypsy Creek Bubbasin Drainage Improvements Design Memorandum (DRAFT). Prepared for City of Renton. Dcmrnber 15, 1995. 14 pp. 6 (3/1V2005 21:32 4257463980 PAGE 02 e Delineation Mictgadon plannint and monicorinr a o Reconnaissance ervaluatlona Lb-ar Projects(roads,po-e r and 1rae lam)e O Permit aspistarme and arenrcy coot4irotion Emvironmenral complus -d—ing oorucrucc(an e 0 Professional report preparation WETLA D FERMI M ING SERVICES leer review and permit conditioning e o I.n�ce aeulysi.and.equti„c4,g Wetland inventories o M.o..es �(2")� 'S�'7T)9 „P41sp 'm September 10, 2005 Howard Seelig Seelig Properties P.O.Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Wetland and Drainage Determimition ofKennydale property Located East of Lake Washington Blvd. SE,North of NE 44th Street, City of Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Seelig: At your request;I conducted a wetland and stream investigation on your property in Renton, Washington(Section 29, Township 24 North,Range 5 East)on November 27,2001;a follow-up visit occurred on September 8,2005.The site is on a hillside sloping down towards the west.An incised channel begins along the mid-point of the east property line and cuts through the site to the west.Water was flowing briskly on the date of the site visit in 2001,during a period of heavy:rainfall. The objective of the investigation was two fold:to determine the classification of the drainage channel cutting from.east to west through the site as defined in the Renton Municipal Code(RMC);and to determine whether or not this water course has any associated wetlands,as defined in the Washington Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). The study area of this investigation was confined to the vicinity of the channel. Drainage Determination Three documents,all of which have been submitted to the city with the application package,were reviewed to arrive at the determination regarding the classification of the watercourse on the Kennydale site.The primary focus of this synthesis of these documents is to determine whether or not the water that discharges into the channel onto the Seelig property derives from a natural source or is an entirely manmade feature. The reports were: 1. Fisheries value of drainage on property—part of tate Gypsy Subbasin Drainage,Proposed Kennydale Business Park,prepared by Michele McGrady, Senior Staff Biologist,Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., dated October 1 I, 2000. 2. Technical Information Report,Kennydale Business Park, prepared by poggemeyer Design Group, dated July 2004, including a report entitled"Drainage Report for Fisheries Conditions",prepared by Poggemeyer Design Group,dated June 14,2000. sa•ale�' ►� 09/11/2005 21:32 4257463980 PAGE 03 Seelig Kcnnydale Wetland and Stream Determinations September 10,2005 3. Letter from Larry Fisher,Area Habitat Biologist, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlif regarding Lot 167,Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition No. 3,Unnamed Creek, Tributary to Lake Washington, King County, WRIA 0$. LKWA,dated December 17, 2001. Both studies 1 and 2 cited above are consistent in characterizing the channel as artificially created and not derived from a relocated natural channel. The Drainage Report for Fisheries Conditions indicates that the water that is discharged onto me Seelig Kennydale property collects ground water tbrough a series of perforated pipes between 111 Avenue SE and 113"Avenue SE,as well as from catch basins that collect most of the runoff from 113'". The letter prepared by Associated Earth Sciences indicates that"no evidence of a natural drainage was located upstream of the site,.-Therefore,the series of stormdrains above the site would not be classified as a creek."Moreover,the report states,the subject drainage does not offer any direct value to fisheries. The report concludes that,`cif time on-site drainage flow was plead in a pipe,it would result in no direct loss of fisheries habitat." RMC 4-11-190 and RMC 4-3-050 L.l.a.5,define Stream and Lake Classes.The subject drainage, according to the reports cited above,meets the definitional criterion 5 a,i.e.: 5. Class 5: Class 5 waters are nonregulated non-salmonid-bearing waters which meet one or more of the following criteria: , a.Flow within an artificially consfructed channel where no naturally definexl channel had Previously existed.Artificial channels are defined in RMC as:A stream channel that is entirely manmade but does not include relocated natural channels. Thus,by definition,the drainage is not regulated by RMC 43-050. Mr. Seelig coordinated with WDFW in December 2001 regarding the proposal to place the surface waters flowing onto the property into a culvert.As stated in the letter from Mr, Fisher dated December 17,2001, mitigation was provided in the form of participation in a fish habitat restoration project in Patterson Creek in Maple Valley. Thus,any mitigation requirements that may be imposed by the City of Renton pursuant to the proposed culvert have been fully addressed in advance of the current application. Wetland Determination The Washington Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual requires the exarnuiation of three characteristics and indicators of wetlands:hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils,and wetland hydrology. Positive indicators of all three characteristics must normally be present to make a positive wetland determination. The banks of the channel,as well as the balance of the site,are comprised of a deciduous forested plant community dominated in the overstory by red alder(Almon rubra). Black cottonwood(Populus balsamifera),big-leaf maple(Acer macrophyllunr),and choke cherry(Prunus marggi Wa)are also present in the overstory in trace amounts. The understory is Dearly monntypic Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus),though some salmonberry is also present, The groundlayer,where present mostly along the toe of the slope;is comprised of Pacific blackberry(Rubus ursinus),sword fem(Polystichum munitum),bt'ackenfern(Ptendium aquiltnam),sats] (Gaultheria shallon),Oregon grape(Mahonia aqu#blia),and English ivy( odera helix). This is a non-hydrophytie plant community. _09/11/2005 21:32 4257463980 PAGE 04 r .1 of j Seelig Kennydale Wetland and Stream Der -dnatiow,, September 10,2005 ✓ Soils on the site axe mapped in the Soil Survey of King County Area as Kitsap silt loam 8 to 15%slope and Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30%slopes.The Kitsap series is a very deep,moderately well drained soil on terrace escarpments. Typically,the surface layer is dark grayish brown silt loam about 6 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil is dark brown silt loam about 14 inches thick.The lower part is olive brown silty clay loam about 13 inches thick. Permeability of the Kitsap soil is slow,available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is limited by a seasonal perched water table that is at o depth of 18 to 30 inches from December to May. Seep areas or springs are common. The Kitsap series is a non- hydric soil(S.C.S., 1985).Exposed soil along the incised channel matched the soil description. On the Kennydale site,no areas of seeps,springs or saturated soils were observed during either site visit. In summary,none of the three wetland criteria,hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils, or wetlands hydrology,is met within the study area on the subject site. Thank you for using the services of WPS on this project.Please don't hesitate to call with any questions. Sincerely, Celeste Botha i 1Sre b + J SFP401. �r PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASKINOTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 88104-1511 Senior Title Oiticer, Mi.km Sharkey (ndkeshark"pnwt.cvm) Title Officer, Curtin 4o4dman (curtisgoodmanepnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Charlie Bell (char1jebellspnve,0*m) unit, N`Q1 12 FAX NO. (206)343-1330 TelelPhcne Number (206)343--1327 Seelig Family Properties 1309 114rn Avenue SE, #107 Title Order no. 661761 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Mertin Seelig Your Ref. : 621 COMPANY LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCX MULZ A Effective Dace- August 11., 2005 at 8:00 a.m. Liability: $S,9010-yea.. 1 Chorge o fi 330.00 TAX: 29.04 1 I. The estate or interest in the lana deeacribe►d herein and which is covered by this certificate is foo aide. 2. The estate or interest referred to herein, according to the public records, Is at Date of Certificate vested in: 621 COMPANY 3_ The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the state of Washington, and described as follow,e: Tract 167, C.A. Hillman's Lake Washington Gardens of Edon Addition to Seattle, Division too. 3, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17. of Plate, page 81, in King County, Washington. 7S ggvA ;'IT I?—Hn;,rl 9T1-43S £278T.9bgl b SE:11 zQOZIL1/80 ZO 39dd 08669PLSZb ES:EZ 500Z/LT/80 7 1 1� Order No. 6QI761 LIMITSD LIABILITY MTIFICATS SCFM LE B page 1 A. OMMRA,L ,EXCEPTIONS e 1. RJghts or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private t4scments, or claims of easemennt$, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line dimpu.tas, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. i. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hermatzer furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the workman,a Compeneation Art not shown by the public racorda. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands ccmgrising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor linee as established or changed by the united state* Government, 6. (a) Unpatented Mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to welter. 7. Amy service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction chargee for sewer, water, electricity or garbage x�en4val. 8. General taxes not now pe.yable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, namements or equitable servitudes. B. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS; As on schedule B. attached. FA 9311i33d06d g1133S E0z9 T5t9Zc SC-TT SOOZ/L T/80 60 39dd 086690LSZP E9:F7. GAA7.//T/AA order No. 601751 LIMIT= LIABILITY CTRTIPICATA SCKSDULB B Page 2 SPECIA[. EXCFPTIONB I. Thin xepott is restricted to the use of the addressee, and is not to be used to at bovi s for closing any transaction affsct4ng title to said property. The liability of the Company is limited to $5,000.00. 2 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS RSVSXMC= THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: RESERVED 8y: MU90 Victor Johnson, as his separate estate PURPOSX: water pipe AANA AFFECTED: portion of said premiaas DATED: July 12, 1968 RECORDED; September 5, 1958 RECORDING NUMBER: 6601991 3, ZASMGMT AND THE TERMS AND COMITIONS REP'BRBNCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITID To, THE FOLLOWING, GRANTER, King County Water District #10, PURPOSE: Construction, operation, repair and maintenance of an eight-inch di.atnerer se=wer pipe located approximately six Peet below the existing surfeiae of the land ARBA AFFECTED: portion of said premises RXCOADSD: July 13, 1979 RIPCORDING Ni MAXR: 7907130614 4. 03"RAL AND SPECIAL TAXRS AND CHARGES: FIRST MF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: 93COND HALF 08LINQUENT XOVEMBZX 1, IF UNPAID: TZAR* 2045 TAX ACCOVWT yf0111All 334330.0820-02 LEW CODE: 2152 CURRENT AZSESEED VALUE: Land: $523,600.0c Improvementa: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLRD GMERAL TAXESt $6,239.44 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.95 $5,00 TOTAL b:t&BDs $6,244.39 PAIDa $3,123.30 TOTAL DVZt $.3,123.19 (continued) S3Ii83dCbd 9I-13�3S e0Z8T9b5Z,b S£:TT S0©Z,'/_T/80 VO 39dd ARI;F9tb/C.7.b PC:P7 CMI 7/1 T/Glia order No_ aol7ol LIMIT- 30 LIABILITY CERjjFICATE SCHEDULE B Pages 3 5. Texma and conditi.ona of the paxtnership/4oint Venture agreement, and any amendments thereto, for 621 Company, a partnership. A copy of the agreement, and any rip44AdmOntp thOreto, Must be submitted to the Company for its review prier to closing, 6. Matters of record, if any, against she names of the undisclosed partnere/mint vanturera which may affect the interest of the following partnerabip/joint venture: 621 Company, a partnership AND OF SCHMULS B Title to this property was examined by: Myron Suer Any inquiriea should be direCCOO to one of the title officers got forth in Schedule A. rws/care/�$az�.elz�o 90 3.abd a3I1�3dMW r�I�3�S @�8LSb6Zv S£ It ck►0„'tt/89 90 39dd nAPPgb)G7b cc:c7 crara7 iJ T JQb i 7 , w C.D . iii l loran' a Lake Washington Garden of Eden .Addition to Seattle , Div. 3 x.1/81 • • ' A .7�nw wb.qty r—.�.•� .........o-+.+..tlQ�.f+�-•- ....4w +. % ~ r" /F lot to 1 7 Lot t . Ila .46 /Ft'ii/ �6s• I +'►r •M•iM • �� 1•w wn. NORT FM TME M� Jytwr� r AM/r.wM n 1 t Company of Washington,Inc. Order No. 601761 imPORTRNTe "is is not a plat of Survey. It iis furnished an a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streeco and other land. No liability is assumed by reamQu of reliance hereon. 90 IJbd S3M13d0ad 91-133S EGZBIGVGZb GPM 9013VZT/80 90 39dd 086£9b/q7b FC:P7 QRLA7//T/012