The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCED Planning FileI'Ulii·'I\ili Ui'I!SiUN , "~ Gil'fOi: RENTON \lV M• R 2 1 1989, ~COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE ~ " U COMMITTEE REPORT ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!I It. MARCil 20. 1989 ~. BLACK RIVER OUARRY AS KING COUNTY WASTE REDUCTION PROJECT (Referred 4/4/88) The llIack River Quarry site was an issue when King County was considering incineration as a viable solution 10 the solid waste probe 1m. King County has shifted their emphasis to waste reduction and recycling. and the issue has been resolved for the foreseeable future. The Community' Services Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Director to delete this item as it has been resolved via Planning Division negotiations with Tukwila and King County. The Planning Division worked on an interlocal agreement with Tukwila and gave testimony at the 1I0undnry Review Bonrd henrings on the issue. The Boundary Review Board deleted the area east of the railroad right-of -way from the annexation; and in February 1989. the voters approved an annexation of the remaining area to Tukwila. The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Director to delete this item as it is work that has been completed. FEES FOR ANIMAL LICENSES. BUILDING PERMITS. AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Referred 10117/88) Permit fees were reviewed by the committee as part of the 1989 budget process and recommended for approval. The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Director to delete this item from the referral list. March 20. J 989 TransportatIon Committee . Streets: City-Wide Arterial Study Rezone: Oakwood Homes, Inc., and Preliminary Plat, R-091-88, PP-091- 88 Community Services Committee King County: Black River Quarry Waste Reduction Finance: Fees for Animal Licenses, Building Permits, and Environmental Review UtilitIes Committee Garbage: Waste Redu'ction and Recycling Study Utility: Bryn Mawr- Lakeridge Sewer Exchange for Renton Crowne Apartments , 'I \ _--!R:!.!e;anut!.LonIWoC<.!i~tyw.C,l%:yu!!ncl<Jil!.l-"M!!lu' nLl/u""te.,s,-,._ Page 79 Transportation Commiltee Chairman Mathews presented a report recommending Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Works Director to delete the following items since they will be considered as part of the City-Wide Arterial Study: Items #9, legislation to restrict weight limit on City streets; #25, truck routes in North Renton; and #26, Metro traffic in residential areas of North Renton. The Commiltee recommended that Item #24, Victoria Hills revisions, be deleted from the referrals as this malter is beiflg monitored by the Planning and Development Commiltee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMM!TTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Leiter from John Malgarini, 1058 Tacoma Avenue NE, Renton, was entered questioning Council action of 3/13/89 in response to his request for clarification of the scope of appeal on the Oakwood Homes, Inc. rezone and preliminary plat. Council had adopted a motion requiring Mr. Malgarini to file a timely appeal on the malter accompanied by required fee which would be refunded if the appeal was found to be invalid. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR RESPONSE. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report regarding the 4/4/88 referral of the potential addition of Black River Quarry to King County's waste reduction project. The quarry site was an issue when King County was considering incineration as a viable solution to the solid waste problem. King County has shifted their emphasis to waste reduction and recycling and the issue has been resolved for the foreseeable future, The Commiltee' recommended concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete this item as it has been resolved as a result of negotiations with Tukwila and King County. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report regarding the 4/4/88 referral of the proposed Fire District #1 annexation to the City of Tukwila. The Planning Division has worked on an interlocal agreement with Tukwila and gave testimony at the Boundary Review Board hearings on the issue. The Boundary Review Board deleted the area east of the railroad right-of-way from the annexation, and in February, 1989, the voters approved an annexation of the remaining area to Tukwila. Therefore, the Commiltee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete this item since the work has been completed. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report regarding fees for animal licenses, building permits, and envIronmental review referred on 10/17/88. Permit fees were reviewed by the Commillee as part of the 1989 budget process and recommended for approval. The Commiltee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete this item from the referral list. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Commiltee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete the fOllowing items as they were responded to as part of preparing the Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan and the implementation ReQuest for Proposals (RFPs): Item #39, Ethel Tel ban leiter regarding garbage dumpsters; #43, petition from Renton Hill residents regarding garbage container; and #47, letter from Ideal Paper Stock Company regarding garbage contract for recycling. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED .. Utilities Commiltee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report concurring with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to approve the proposed concept of sewage flow transfer between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Water and Sewer District, subject to approval by the City A Itorney. The Committee also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement in concept and that City staff be authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Water and Sewer District for this sewer flow exchange after the engineering plans have been approved. MOVED BY I .j t 'i .J t ·1 , ". " .'" r ' "\ ! . j I " I j i ~~ Earl Clymer, Mayor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ; .• .1 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM March I, 1989 Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Nancy Laswell Morris Tukwila Interlocal Agreement Last year Tukwila initiated an annexation of Fire District # I which encompasses a large area north of the existing Tukwila city boundaries including an area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and north of the City of Renton. (Attachment A) This area, which includes the Black River Quarry property, is within the City of Renton sphere of influence. As a result the City challenged the annexation of this disputed area to Tukwila. Tukwila had wanted to retain the area within the annexation in order to have control because the area was identified by King County as a potential EIRR site. Throughout the early summer of 1988 the City councils of Renton and Tukwila met to discuss the issues. Boundary Review Board invoked jurisdiction because of Renton's concerns as well as other issues. Prior to the Boundary Review Board final determination Gary Van Dusen and Mayor Clymer signed a Memorandum of Understanding on August 23, 1988 which stated among other things that an intertocal agreement for planning would be entered into by Renton and Tukwila for this disputed area. In September the Boundary Review Board deleted the disputed area from the Tukwila annexation. Carrie had been the planner tracking this interlocal. Upon her death the project languished. Tukwila contacted Long Range Planning in December requesting that the interlocal be executed in conformance with the memo of understanding and provided a draft for review. I have reviewed this Interlocal and find it unacceptable in its current form. The draft goes well beyond the terms of the memo of understanding. I have contacted Moira Bradshaw who is the assigned staff from Tukwila and conveyed my concerns. She would like to resolve the differences and get this agreement to her council in the next month. The purpose of this memo is two-fold: (I) to inform you on my concerns and seek policy direction; and (2) to request direction on initiating action on this interlocal by the Council. Attached are my analysis of the issues, a copy of the draft interlocal, and a copy of the memorandum of understanding. 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206)235-2550 1 i , " , ~ I: , ,I , i ! I , i " .. , TUKWILA INTERLQCAL ANALYSIS Qf ISSUES -. 1. Page 2, Section 5, Plan Participation Plall participatiOl' mealls the right to be illvolved ill Plall Development. Fllrtller, with respect to Ihe plalls referellced ill Plall Developmellt, the followillg shall also COllstitute Plan Participation; timely notificatioll of formal sIal! meelillgs, public meetings. alld hearillgs regardillg the plall; Ihe opportullitv to participale ill liraft plall formulatioll: and processes to resolve differellces aI,d/or achieve simultaneous adootion ill agreed UDOII areas. This language goes beyond the level of involvement and agreement which is warranted. The memo of understanding states: ' Establish a cooperative relationship through which RerUOI' alld Tukwila call develop and mailltaill compatible policies regardillg lalld use, service delivery alld arlllexaliollS wilhill Ihe Subject Area. The jurisdiction for this area rests clearly with Renton. Good land use planning would warrant consideration of Tukwila and King County plans for surrounding areas. The plan should also be developed with adequate opportunity for meetings and comments from surrou'nding jurisdictions. I would recommend deletion of the underlined phrases. 2, Page 3, Section H., Staff Consultation Sial! Consultatioll means a commitmellt to give the other jurisdicitioll all opportullity to ask questiolls and make commellts at the stal! level. The reviewillg jurisdicttoll has the opportullity to request a meetillg to get illformatioll alld explal,ation alld to indicate the relative compatibility of the actioll or plall beillg cOllsidered with its OWII plans alld policies, This oDoortullilv ille/illies a commilme,tt bv the initiating jurisdcitioll to include ;" Us pertinelll staff rernrl 'he reviewing" iu,isdictim,'s timelv submiued wr;tlen comments, As with Issue I, the concern with this paragraph is the intent of the underlined phrase. As a matter of policy, City staff already includes all comments in the package of materials which are transmitted to the hearing body. However, this sentence would imply that a section of the Transmittal Report would be devoted to the position of a neighboring jurisdiction. Such an obligation is excessive, Staff recommends deletion of this sentence. 3. Page 4, Section C.d, SEPA Process OpportUllily to participate ill Rellloll's SEPA process as provilied for by lire Slale Envirollmelllal Policy Act Rules (WAC 197-11-942 alld 197-11-944). Givell a timely request by Tukwila, Relltoll shall lIegotiate the lIaiure alld scope of Tukwila's participatioll, which mav ir,elude ioilll lead agellcy slatlls. Rentoll lVill cooperate to illcorporale Tukwila's cOllce"'s cOllsislellt with Rellloll's lIeed to comply with federal, state alld local laws, Relltoll's procedural requiremellls alld admillislrative lIecessity. . , <, , . ; The City of Renton would clearly be lead agency for an project action and/or plan development. Staff recommends deletion of this phrase. 4. Page S, Section IX, Cost of Performing Agreement Renton and Tukwila agree to jointly share the costs of any legal efforts incurred in challenging the possible siting of a King Coullly Energy/Resource Recovery facility ill the Subject Area. The City Council has' not taken a formal position on the possible siting of an E/R R facility at the Black River Quarry. Under Mayor Shinpoch the direction to staff was that the "not in my back yard" position was not responsible. This Section IX of the interlocal would be synonymous with the Council passing a formal resolution opposing siting of a facility in this location. Without a resolution from Council such language should be deleted . y u. . i I I ! 1 i " " 1 '1 j I I 1 '1 j I , 'i .J I .i i .\ 'J , ·1 i .1 ~ e l i I TO i ______ ~JO~E~S~P~AllR~R~BA~S~SL1S~TuAllNuT~p~IBABNBN~ER~ ____________ __ V ' I RENTON POLICY PLANNING I--------~~~~~~~~~~~~---------------------- C lTV OF RENTON 220 5. f1tt:t:=AYEN8E 5. + RENTON, WA. 98055 SUBJECT F R o M MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW MF-BBAGE ATTACHED IS THE PACKAGE I ,SENT IN DECEMBER REGARDING INTERLOCAL. -.-.. , .. ~ .. _' ........ ", " ...... '-: ,," 'J '.1 , II: 11 ( c.. ... I ,. ".~ TRIP ,.' REPLY .'.-=-:..:=-.:::...:....-------------------------:~ (j , .. 'f t.,.:_ --------------------------------~1 ; ". ; . ;' , . . ", .; .' '.' "," " , :. ,', \' . I' , ,.; : ; ... ': . ',\ , ',,,," ~ ., l ... . , '", . SIGNED SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT. PAR' 3 WIU IE RETURNED WITH amy. carbunle •• POLY PAK 150 SETS) .. P .. 72 .". , ,,' ,. , . . '.", .' "', . , city"af Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 (206) 433·1849 December 9, 1988 Mr. Larry Springer Planning Manager C Hy of Renton 220 S. Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: . RENTON· TUKWILA INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Dear Larry: " ' . ~ The 'attached, signed copy of the Memorandum of Understanding between the cities of Renton and Tukwila discusses an interlocal agreement being negotiated. We believe the intent of the Memorandum was that the Interlocal would and should be completed. I have modified the draft copy of the Interlocal that I received from Joe Sparr, to exclude any reference to the Boundary Review 80ard deletion of the subject area, as that has already been accomplished. Otherwise, no changes are proposed by us and we would like to present the Interlocal to our Community Affairs Committee as soon as you are satisfied with the Agreement. Please coordinate any modifications you would like to make and your time frame for processing the Agreement with Rick Beeler at 433·1846. I will be on vacation until the first of the new year. I look forward to completing the Agreement as expeditiously as possible. Thank you. ~~d Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner Attachment MB/jj \ I • .' MEMORAN BetweeD the 10 Regards to Tukwila's Propo ,.. . : .;.' ~f;'~~ -" , ~ I' ,,", , ~~t;;J;';'·8-f.,--~~Je('-,i '>fIr] /" The City of Tukwila has accepted a petit, U kill!; l!'l .L-.'o/I.J.r '0'&( gincgoCuOnUtynty Fire District # I utilizing the election me VI r I it" (t .... Boundary Review Board. A King County Fire District #1 includes a, Q (' -l'ernt' rit-Northern Railroad right-of-way, south of State Rd , lrporate limits in the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewag, ,e Subject Area.) , 'I I • ----. 1 --... -. , ..... -. ... - The Cities of Renton and Tukwila recognize that the Subject Area is within the Planning and Impact Areas of both Cities and, as such, any development in this area may have visual, environmental, transportation, public service and utility impacts on one or both of the Cities. The Renton City Council adopted Resolution 2561, and the Tukwila City Council adopted Resolution 1008, and the Cities of Renton and Tukwila acknowledged in a prior interlocal agreement that they will jointly review any future annexations in the vicinity of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, consistent with the 1987 Renton-Tukwila'Boundary Line Adjustment. The planning staff members from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are currently negotiating an interlocal agreement addressing inter-governmental cooperation, land use, service delivery, and annexation in the Subject Area, The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to: 1. Establish a cooperative relationship through which Renton and Tukwila can develop and maintain compatible policies regarding land use, service delivery and annexations within the Subject Area; and 2. Create a workable system for inter-jurisdictional communication between Renton and Tukwila in the implementation of mutual goals within the Subject Area; and 3. Provide a means whereby Renton and Tukwila will consider each other's plans regulations and policies in land use development decisions within the Subject Area; and 4. Establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting the King County Boundary Review Board to delete the Subject Area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1; and 5. Provide a means by which Renton will support the annexation of all or a pOrlion of the Subject Area to Renton. SIGNED this z,?,vp{ day of h~ , 1988. ~~~-:::..~.c:.p..o£l1~ ___ ....... _ ~! Mayor, City of Tukwila ct:dsk3c:fdl memo I ~ .. ., , I I " I' ,. I I .. PRAFT ATTACHMENT "C" This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this -day of _____ -',1988, by and between the CITY OF RENTON (hereinafter referred to as "Renton") and the CITY OF TUKWILA (hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila") as follows: I PURPOSE The purpose of this agreement is to: A. Establish a cooperative relationship through which Renton and Tukwila can develop and maintain compatible policies regarding land use, service delivery, and annexations within the area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, south of State Route 900, and north of the existing Renton corporate limits In the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewage Treatment Plant (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Area") (see Exhibits A and B); and B. Create a workable system for the inter-jurisdictional communication between Renton and Tukwila in the implementation of mutual goals within the Subject Area; and C Provide a means whereby Renton and Tukwila will consider each other's plans, regulations and policies in land use development deci- sions within the Subject Area; and D. Follow through on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the Mayors of Tukwila and Renton on August 23,1988, and the County Boundary Review Board decision to delete the Subject Area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District No.1; and E. Provide a means by which Renton will support the annexation of aU or portions of the Subject Area to Renton. U DEFINITIONS A. Agency Notice means written notification mailed through regular post or hand delivered from Renton to Tukwila, or vice-versa, which is given in a manner consistent with ensuring timely exchange of infor- mation in the consideration of each other's plans and policies. For the purposes of this agreement, each notice shall: 1. Identify the nature of the action or plan being considered (e.g., plan amendment, preliminary subdivision, etc.); and 2. Indicate the location bf the subject of the notice; and 3. Name the staff person and phone number for obtaining additional information; and 4. State the dates of the effective review and comment period; and 5. State where written comments should be sent; and . I ! j 1 I I j 't :. f I " .. ~. " Page 2 6. Include an environmental checklist and threshold determination as well as a vicinity map and site plan for both "project" o~ "non- project" actions. B .. 'Annexation Proposals means those proposals made to extend the boundaries of a City to encompass presently unincorporated territory as provided for in RCW 35A.14. C. Development Permit Review means the regulatory decision-making process used by a local government for review and approval of pro- posals which require one or more permit, certificate, or other written authorization from that local government, including land use, devel- opment and construction projects. Specifically, Development Permit Review pertains to the following: 1. Zoning reclassifications 2. Preliminary subdivisions 3. Preliminary planned unit developments 4. Conditional use permits 5. Unclassified use permits 6. Shoreline permits 7. Construction of any of the following: i. More than 20 dwelling units ii. Agricultural buildings of 30,000 square feet or more iii. School, office, commercial, industrial, and/or recreational service and storage buildings of 12,000 square feet or more iv. Parking lots for more than 40 automobiles v. Filling, grading or excavating of 500 cubic yards or more D. Interlocal Agreement means an agreement between general purpose local governments, which is adopted pursuant to RCW 39.34 and which pertains to land development, service delivery, and annexations in the Subject Area. . E. Plan Development means the preparation or major amendment of any planning documents which express goals, policies and plans for land use (e.g., Comprehensive Plans, Community Plans, Zoning Code). F. Plan Participation means the right to be involved in Plan Develop- ment. Further, with respect to the plans referenced in Plan Develop- ment, the following shall also constitute Plan Participation; timely notification of formal staff meetings, public meetings, and hearings regarding the plan; the opportunity to participate in draft plan formulation; and processes to resolve differences and/or achieve simultaneous adoption in agreed upon areas. The jurisdiction desiring to participate shall contact the other juris- diction within the effective response period indicated in the notice announcing the initiation of plan development. The full nature and extent of Plan Participation is to be determined by representatives oi the appropriate Renton and Tukwila departments as designated by thl! official charged with overall administrative responsibility in Section Vlll of this agreement. \ ! I I I I I I \ I ~ I j , 'J i ., I 1 1 I 1 i ! Page 3 • G. Review and Comment Opportunity means the provision of pertinent materials for a reasonable amount of time during which a reviewing jurisdiction can review those materials and prepare responsive com- ments. The specific mechanics shall be determined administratively by Renton and Tukwila and shall provide for interagency discussion prior to the formalized procedures and timeframes of local SEP A ordinances. The initiating jurisdiction may grant reasonable extensions where the provision of additional time would not interfere with meeting requirements of state or local laws, procedural requirements, or administrative necessity. Comments submitted in a timely manner shall be considered by the initiating jurisdiction in its deliberation on the plan or action. The times established by this agreement for review and comment shall be within decision deadlines of the initiating jurisdiction, as established by law,court action, or adopted administrative rules or regulations. H. Staff Consultation means a commitment to give the other jurisdiction an opportunity to ask questions and make comments at the staff level. The reviewing jurisdiction has the opportunity to request a meeting to get information and explanation and to indicate the relative compati- bility of the action or plan being considered with its own plans and policies. This opportunity includes a commitment by the initiating jurisdiction to include in its pertinent staff report the reviewing juriS- diction's timely submitted written comments. I. Subject Area means that area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right~ of-way, south of State Route 900, and north of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewage Treatment Plant. This area is legally described in Exhibit B and sho~n on Exhibit A. m RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING LAWS AND STATUTES This agreement in no way modifies nor supersedes existing laws and statutes. In meeting the commitments encompassed in this agreement, both parties will comply with the requirements of the Annexation Statutes, Open Meetings Act, State Environmental Policies Act and other state laws. IV RESPONSIBILITIES/SUBSTANTIVE EFFECT The Subject Area designated in Exhibit A is subject to the provisions of this agreement as specified in this .section. Renton and Tukwila shall cooperate and coordinate land use planning and development controls in the Subject Area as designated in the manner provided in this section. Nothing in this agreement shall restrict Renton and Tukwila from establishing other cooperative agreements addressing particular projects, areas or concerns not subject to this agreement. A. Statement of Ultimate Authority -Notwithstanding the provisions of this agreement, the ultimate authority for land use and development decisions is retained by Renton and Tukwila within their respective jurisdictions. The provisions of this agreement do not allow either jurisdiction to abrogate ultimate decision making responsibility granted them by law. ,. ,. / , , ,:T'~!'\ \, Page 4 B. Delineation of Obligations, Rules and Procedures -Within the Subject Ares, Renton and Tukwila mutually agree and pledge to assume certain obligations, apply certain rules and follow certain procedures which are detailed in Sections V and VI. V ANNEXATIONS AND LAND USE A. Tukwila agrees to support the annexation of all or portions of the Subject Area to Renton. During the SEP A review process of Renton's proposed annexation of all or portions of the Subject Area, Renton shall provide Tukwila with: 1. Agency Notice 2. Review and Comment Opportunity 3. Opportunity for Staff Consultation Upon the City of Renton's annexation of all or portions of the Subject Area, Renton and Tukwila agree that: 1. When it undertakes Development Permit Review, Renton shall provide Tukwila with: a. Agency Notice b. Review and Comment Opportunity c. Opportunity for Staff Consultation d. Opportunity to participate in Renton's SEPA process as provided for by the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (WAC 197-11-942 and 197-11-944). Given a timely request by Tukwila, Renton shall negotiate the nature and scope of Tukwila'S participation, which may include joint lead agency status. Renton will cooperate to incorporate Tukwila'S con- cerns consistent with Renton's need to comply with federal. state and local laws, Renton's procedural requirements, and administrative necessity. 2. When it undertakes plan development, Renton shall provide Tukwila with: . I a. Agency Notice. b. Review and Comment Opportunity c. Opportunity for Staff Consultation d. Opportunity for plan participation e. Opportunity to discuss disputed issues in a good faith attl!mi't to resolve differences before the draft plan is completed. When Tukwila desires this negotiation process it shall m.Jkl· a timely request. i i, I ., , VI UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ,. "\ . , Page 5 A. Due to the physical barrier created by the Burlington Northern Rail- road tracks, Renton and Tukwila recognize that Renton and/or other existing King County special purpose districts are the jurisdictions able to provide utility services to the Subject Area in the most logical and cost-effect! ve manner. ~.-.- ~/ " B. Tukwila agrees to provide-fir~ protection services on a contractual basis ' to the Subject Area. Upon the City of Renton's annexation of any por- tions of the Subject Area, Renton will provide fire protection services in the same manner to those annexed areas as other properties within the Renton corporate limits. VII EFFECTIVE DATE AND FILING Renton and Tukwila acknowledge that, pursuant to RCW 39.34.120, interlocal agreements may not technically become effective until after submission of the completed agreement to the Washington State Office of Community Affairs. Accordingly, upon complete execution of this agree- ment, it shall be filed with the Office of Community Affairs and the agree- ment shall formally become effective sixty (60) days after filing with that office. Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date, the Office of Community Affairs may file written comments with Renton and Tukwila concerning this agreement. Prior to the effective date of this agreement, it shall be filed with the King County Auditor, with the Renton and Tukwila City Clerks, and with the Secretary of State, pursuant to RCW 39.34.040 .. VIII ADMINISTRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The responsibility for administering this agreement shall rest jointly with the Mayors of the Cities of Renton and Tukwila through their respective designees. Within thirty (30) days of its signing, the designees shall inform each other of the names and addresses to be used in correspondence regard- ing this agreement. Each jurisdiction has the responsibility of keeping this contact information current and for directing correspondence consistent with this information. IX COST OF PERFORMING AGREEMENT Renton and Tukwila shall each be responsible for their own costs incurred, pursuant to this agreement, unless some other contractual arrangements are made. " .--"--;--""". """ ----.--..... , ...------ Renton and Tukwila agree to jointly share the costs of any legal efforts ') incurred in challenging the possible siting of a King County Energy / Resource Recovery facility in the Subject Area. X AMENDMENT This agreement may be amended only by express written agreement of both Renton and Tukwila, pursuant to legislative action by each. ! " , i ! I 1 1 j I .1 I I \ I I I I I I I , i .I I ! .1 " 'I I .~ .J " " " I. . ~ " Page 6 XI DURATION AND TERMINATION " This agreement shaH become effective on the date of its mutual adoption by Renton and Tukwila, This agreement will remain in effect until termin- ated in writing by either Renton or Tukwila, pursuant to legislative action after thirty (30) days notice to the other party. CITY OF RENTON Earl Clymer, Mayor ATTEST: Maxine E. Motor Renton City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lawrence J. Warren Renton City Attorney CITY OF TUKWILA Gary L, VanDusen,'Mayor Maxine Anderson Tukwila City Clerk Larry Hard Tukwila City Attorney Ar DATE CO. ~~if6-~t...;;~:.a~,'t;!e~~::::.._ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERST A'" Between the Cities oC Renton and Tukwila In Regards to Tukwila's Proposed Annexation of Kina County Fire District #1 The City of Tukwila has accepted a petition to annex the property encompassed by King County Fire District # I utilizing the election method and has filed that petition with the King County Boundary Review Board. King County Fire District #1 includes an area (Attachment A) east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, south of State Route 900. and north of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewage Treatment Plant (hereafter referred to as the Subject Area.) The Cities of Renton and Tukwila recognize that the Subject Area is within the Planning and Impact Areas of both Cities and. as such, any development in this area may have visual. environmental. transportation, public service and utility impacts on one or both of the Cities. The Renton City Council adopted Resolution 2561. and the Tukwila City Council adopted Resolution 1008. and the Cities of Renton and Tukwila acknowledged in a prior interlocal agreement that they will jointly review any future annexations in the vicinity of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. consistent with the 1987 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment. . The planning staff members from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are currently negotiating an interlocal agreement addressing inter-governmental cooperation. land use. service delivery, and annexation in the Subject Area. The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to: I. Establish a cooperative relationship through which Renton and Tukwila can develop and maintain compatible policies regarding land use. service delivery and annexations within the Subject Area; and 2. Create a workable system for inter-jurisdictional communication between Renton and Tukwila in the implementation of mutual goals within the Subject Area; and 3. Provide a means whereby Renton and Tukwila will consider each other's plans regulations and policies in land use development decisions within the Subject Area; and 4. Establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting the King County Boundary Review Board to delete the Subject Area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District .1; and 5. Provide a means by which Renton will support the annexation of all or a portion of the Subject Area to RentoD. SIGNED this 2-?v"A day of -'T.....,.<=j'F-':..1~---. 1988 . >-. , ., . V n sen Mayor. City of Tukwila Earl Clymer \ Mayor. City of Renton , ">r' .\ ",,", '= ct:dsk3c:f d 1 memo • I I , I 'I . ; 1 , , , MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between the Cities or Renton and Tukwila In Regards to Tukwila's Proposed Annexation or King County Fire District #1 The City of Tukwila has accepted a petition to annex the property encompassed by King County Fire District #1 utilizing the election method and has filed that petition with the King County Boundary Review Board. King County Fire District # I includes an area (Attachment A) east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of -way, south of State Route 900, and north of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewage Treatment Plant (hereafter referred to as the Subject Area.) The Cities of Renton and Tukwila recognize that the Subject Area is within the Planning and Impact Areas of both Cities and, as such, any development in this area may have visual, environmental, transportation, public service and utility impacts on one or both of the Cities. The Renton· City Council adopted Resolution 2561, and the Tukwila City Council adopted Resolution 1008, and the Cities of Renton and Tukwila acknowledged in a prior inter local agreement that they will jointly review any future annexations in the vicinity of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, consistent with the. 1987 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment. The planning staff memben from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are currently negotiating an .m1~r1Qca1.Jl8[ll~ment addressing inter-governmental cooperation, land use, servicedellvery, and annexation in theSiiiijei:TArea.· The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to: I. Establish a cooperative relationship through which Renton and Tukwila can develop and maintain compatible policies regarding land use, service delivery and annexations within the Subject Area; and 2. Create a wnrkable system for inter-jurisdictional communication between Renton and Tukwila in the implementation of mutual goals withio' the Subject Area; and 3. Provide a means whereby Renton and Tukwila will consider each other's plans regulations and policies in land use development decisions within the Subject Area; and 'X 4. Establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting the King County Boundary Review Board to delete the Subject Area from Tukwila'S proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1; and 5. Provide a means by which Renton will support the annexation of all or a portion of the Subject Area to Renton . SIGNED this 'Z-?y~ day of T~ , 1988. ... Earl Clymer . ', Mayor, City of Renton ct:dsk3c:fd I memo '- ~~ CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM September 20, 1988 Mayor Clymer Members of the City Council Mike Parness All Department Heads Maxine Motor Carrie Trimnell King County Fire District #1 Annexation On September 9, 1988, the King County Boundary Review Board issued its decision on the City of Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1. The Board voted to delete the area located east of the Burlington Northern railroad right-of -way, also known as "subarea 3" (please refer to the attached map). The Board's official deletion of this area enables Renton to process the annexation of all or a portion of this subarea. The Planning Division will notify the property owners in subarea 3 as to the Board's decision. Due to several of the property owner's interest in connecting to Renton sewer service, the Planning Division anticipates receiving an annexation petition encompassing the southern portion of the subarea within the next year. If you have any questions, please contact me at x2552. ct:dsk3c:fd I brb6 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2552 TO: FROM: IN RE: "-- Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136111 S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue,WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296-7096 September 9, 19BB !10IRA CARR BRADSHAW, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TUKl'lILA G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION FILE NO. 1450 CITY. OF TUKI'1ILA Annexation (K.C.F.P.0.#1) CITY OF .. ENreN SEP 1 2 1n' RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE The Resoiution and Hearing Decision of the Washington State Boundary tevlew Board in and for King County on the above-referenced file Is enclosed fo. filing as prescribed by RCW 36.93.160(4). In order for the proposed action to be finalized, It Is now necessary that you file with King County a certified copy of your ordinance or resolution accomplishing this action, together with a copy of this letter, with The Office of the Clerk of the Council, 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle, Washington 98104. If we have denied this proposal, you need do nothing further. GBM/pr XC: CLERK OF THE COUNCIL, ATTN: Helene Moclulskl COUNCIL COMMUNITY PLAN <Ii RESOURCES COM. ATTN: . Holly Kean K.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, ATTN: Diane Murdock PARKS, PLANNING <Ii RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ATTN: Mr. James C. Tracy, . . K.C. DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS E 911 PROGRAM, ATTN: Ms. Noreen Allen THE HONORABLE BOARDS OF COMMISSIONERS: K.C.l'l.O.s #20, 25, 125 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL(S): CITIES OF RENTON, SEATTLE SUPERINTENDENTs RENTON S.D. #403; 50. CENTRAL 5 .[).·#406: SEATTLE 5.0.#1 THE HONORABLE BOARDS OF COlI!USSIONERS, K.C.F.P.O.s #1, 11, 1B, 20 THN HONORABLE BOARDS OF COMMISSIONERS, RAINIER VISTA S. D.: SKYWAY S.D.: VAL VUE S.D. Ref. 4.15.87 I ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY IN RE: CITY OF TUKWILA -Proposed ) Annexation (King County Fire OIst. I). ALL IN KING COUNTY. ) WASHINGTON ------------------------) FILE NO. 1450 RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION The Notice of Intention filed in Boundary Review Board File No. 1450 proposed the annexation of certain territory by the City of Tukwila. King County, Washington. After notice dulv fllven, a hearing was held June 16, 1988, before a quorum of the Board at Foster High School. The said hearing was continued on August 9, 1988, at Foster High School. Legal notice was provided prior to the August 9th hearing for the modification :'\' addition of certain Islands and other territory contiguous to the annexation. The hearing was continued on August 24, 1988, In Hearing Room No. 1 of the offices o( the Board In Bellevue, WaShington. On the basis of the testimony, evidence. 'lOd exhibits presented at said Hearing, and the matters on file In said File No. I~SO. It Is the deCision of said Board that the action proposed In said Notice of Intent Ion be, and the same Is, hereby approved as modified In accordance with the "aps and legal description which are attached hereto and Incorporated herein b,· reference. FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPOSAL In reaching thi:, deCision, the Board has considered the many factors prescllbed In RCW 36.93.170. Tne (ollowing have been selected for p,utlcular attention. . First. It should te noted that much of the Information for this decision comes from the Draft EnVironmental Impact Statement prepared by the:::lty. The DEIS divided the annexation area Into four subareas, which will be referred to frequently In this Decision. The reader should refer to file documents if not familiar with these subareas. Annexation History In 1974, the residents of Fire District No. I petitioned the City of Tukwila for a similar annexation. In November of 1974, the Boundary Review Board approved the proposal but deleted the industrialized portion north of the Boeing Access Road, which contained roughlv 80% of the assessed valuation. The City declined to accept. the modified annexation. In 1978, another petition for annexation was received, this time from the Duwamish-Allentown area. It was approved by the Board In 1980 and an appeal was flied by the Fire District. The Board's decision was upheld and the Issue went to a vote of the people In April, 1983. It was rejected. PAGE ONE -TUKWILA/F.D. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 ";: 1 In 1979 the City of Seattle received a petition of registered voters seeking the annexation to the City of an area known as "South Park"; the City filed a Notice of Intention for this annexation in October. 1980. The area included most of Ithe northern. industrialized part· of the subject annexation area. The annexation was denied by the Board. Population and Territory The Notice of Intention described the population as 2.227. The DEIS describes it as follows: SUBAREA NO. I SUBAREA NO.2 SUBAREA NO.3 SUBAREA NO.4 TOTAL: -0- 221 543 1.026 1.900 There Is one single family dwelling In Subarea Nil. I. owned by the Boeing Company. Subarea No.3 Is by this decision deleted. which results In a popula~lon of 1.357. This would be a 280,0 Increase in the Clty's current population of 4.7180. Additionally. there are approximately 20.000 employees working here, most In Subarea No. I (north of the Boeing Access Road.) The proportion of single family dwelllrtgs I In the City would shift. The City's housing Is divided Into 33% single family lind 67% multiple family. Following annexation, this would become 42% and 58%. I respectively, due to the higher percentage of single family dwellings within the annexation. \ As flied, the annexation Is approximately 2.6 square miles. Acreage Information I was not provided by subarea, but It Is estimated that as modified the annexat,lon contains approximately 2.2 square miles. This is due to deletion of Subarea No. -3 which Is approximately .4 square miles. The additions of territory are small except I for the eastern half of tl>e' Duwamlsh River. The amOt1n,~ of that territory has not been calculated. Accordllg to thl,; City, the existing area of the City would I be Increased by approximately 44% by the addition of Alternative n, which Is similar to the area as approved herein .. Comprehensive Plans and Zoning The King County Comprehensive Plan states that the County will provide ur9an services at a feasible level for unincorporated urban areas, but recognizes thati It cannot do so at the levels generally provided by cities. The plan supports loglfal annexation of developed areas. Additionally, It suggests the use of Interlofal Agreements to address planning Issues In potential annexation areas. King Cou~ty has therefore supported the proposed annexation, but has also urged that the bound~ry be expanded In a northerly and westerly direction to include all unincorporated territory In the vicinity of South Park and the 16th Avenue South bridge. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as urban and assumes a mix of uses. The King County Shorelines Master Program designates most of the area al'1ng the Duwamlsh River as Urban Environment. The Tukwila and Renton ComprehensIve Plans also apply in portions of the area. Where they overlap, the plans and policIes of Tukwila do not differ significantly from those of the Co>unty. This Is particularly so regarding land use classifications. Tukwila does handle some land use Issues PAGE TWO -TUKWILA/P.O. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) \ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . i , 23 I I 24 I :1 I 2S i 26 I : '1 27 , i " : 28 I , " , differently. For example, King County manages environmentally sensitive areas with a special ordinance and a series of map folios identifying steep slopes, unstable soils, and other high risk features. 'The City on the other hand relies upon the Uniform Building Code and the State Environmental Policy Act for dealing with these problems. The annexation includes a wide variety of land uses. Subarea No. I (being the portion north of the Boeinl5 Access Road) is completely developed with commercial and Industrial uses. It includes the Boeing Company, Kenworth Truck Company, Rhone Poulenc, Inc., ASSOCIated Grocers, and Jorgensen Steel. It Includes 500 acres of Industrial lands, 165 or which are within the boundaries of the King County International Airport. All of Subarea No. 1 Is zoned Heavy Manufacturing (M-H). Approximately 19,000 people are employed there. Subarea No. 2 lies east of 1-5 and Is otherwise bounded by the City of Seattle. It is characterized by steep slopes and most of It is zoned RS-7200 with small portions of Neighborhood Business (BN) and some Multiple Family (RM-1800). There are two small Light Manufacturing zones in the area. The slopes and landslide and seismic hazard designations in much of this area have kept It sparsely developed. The resulting Irregular street pattern has also discouraged development. Subarea No. 3 is located generally south of South 126th Street and east of the existing Tukwila limits. (A lthough this decision often refers to the deletion of Subarea No.3, it should be noted that the area deleted is only that portion lying east of the east margin of the Burlington-Northern Railroad right-of-way.) Most of this area is industrial In character, but It includes the 250-unit Empire States Apartments and a few single famIly .Jweliings. Much of the area Is In steep slopes. It Includes 166 acres of Industrial land. The Black River Quarry is one of the sites once considered as a possible energy resource recovery site by King County. It Is referred to Informally as the Incinerator site. It is not now apparently under serious consideration. Zoning Is predominantly RM-2400, RU-900 and M-H. Like Subarea No. 2 there are hazard areas due to unstable soils. Most of Subarea No. 3 Is within the interest area of Renton as deSCribed in Its Comprehensive Plan. Most of the population In Subarea No.3 (543 people) is located In the aforementioned apartment complex. Subarea No.4, (tie Allentown-Duwamish-Foster Point Area), Is bounded by the Boeing Access Road on the north, the Duwamish River on the west, Tukwila on the south, and Interstate 5 on the east. The northern portion is predominately commercial and industrial. Metro and Boeing facilities occupy most of the southwest portion. The south half is primarily residential, Including the Allentown, Duwamlsh and Foster Point neighborhoods. Zoning generally reflects land use in this area and includes 190 acres of M-H and M-P (Manufacturing Park) classifications. The neighborhoods are mostly zoned SR-9600. Most of Subarea 4 Is a Class III Seismic Hazard Area. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Includes Allentown and designates it as low-density, single family at 0 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The industrial areas east and west of Allentown are designated Light Industrial by the City. The City's proposed land use designations reflect existing County classifications with very minor exceptions. Most of these exceptions are located In Subarea No. 3. Consequently they are not discussed herein. A majority of the land now In Tukwila is zoned Industrial or Commerclal. Residential areas constitute approximately 407 acres of the City's 2,888 acres.' The annexation as modified would add nearly 800 acres of residential land, most of which is single family. It would also add 700 acres of industrial lands. Most of Tukwila is substantially developed. The annexation would provide some undeveloped PAGB mRBB -TUKWILA/P.O. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 areas, primarily in Subarea No.2, for additional improvements. However, development In that area is limited by the steep slopes. There are opportunities for redevelopmertt in Subarea No. 1. Underdeveloped sites and parking lots could be converted to mote Intense uses. Housing units in Tukwila would increase by 446 (from 2.598 to 3,0441 ). Little population growth is expected as a result of the annexation, other thJn the numbers to be added immediately. A modest upward trend in employme,h following redevelopment in Industrial areas is expected. Services: Community Services Most community services such as Cooperative Extension, Veterans Service~, Youth Work Training, Administration of Block Grant Funds, and Public Health Services, are provided by the State, County, or private agencies. Most of thes'e services would continue unchanged. It Is estimated In the DBIS that contracts f9r human services and health services, etc., would Increase by $9,730 for the City. Services: Library The King County Rural Library District serves unincorporated King County and many of the cities therein. It collects a tax of $0.50 pel' $1,000 of assessed valu~ In the unincorporated portions of the County and In some Incorporated portions of the District. (Bellevue and Bothell have annexed to the District.) Some cities provide their own library services but others, such as Tukwila, obtain service by contractl. Tukwila is charged $0.12 per $1,000 in assessed value not to I!xceed $19.50 per capital,. The effect of this limit is that the Library System will lose revenue between $163,009 and $197,000 per year as a result of annexation with no diminution of service responsibilities. This is a substantial financial impact Which could reduce the Dlstrlcd , ability to provide services. The City Is urged to reconsldl!r Its arrangement with the system and to provide an analysis of the cummulatlve Impact upon the King County Rural Library System due to continued City annexation. Services: Justice System King County provide s municipal-type Judicial Lnd Justice services in the area , at an estimated cost of $9.31 per capita, or approximately $12,600. This is for detention, prosecution, indigent defense, and some misdemeanor adjudiCations.!, Most of the annexation is situated in the Roxbury Municipal Court Dls·;rlct. The, City's attorney and municipal court would take over thest! responsibilities. It Is estimated that misdemeanor case loads would Increase only 5% following annexatlonl of the area as modified. Traffic offense case loads could Increase as much as 100%.\ However, because those cases require little time, the total workload Increase would be modest according to the DEIS. As a result of annexation., the City would expend an additional $32,000 for all Justice services. Services: Parks The annexation contains two parks: the Allentown County Park and the Dtiwamlsh Park, which Is owned by South Central School District. According to the DEIS, the City would acquire at no cost a five acre portion of Allentown Park for development as a neighborhood park. This would be necessary to meet the City's park standards. The City has Indicated It would spend $460,000 In developing that five acres. PAGB FOUR -TUKWILA/F.D. 11 (Apv./Jdod. Add.) :: i I 1\ Services: Fire Protection In April, 1987, King County Fire District No. I contracted with the City for service to the District for a period of ten years. The City hired the District employees and has, according to the contract, the right to use all District property. The 1987 assessed valuation of the District was $339.6 million dollars, resulting in tax revenues at $1.50/$1000 of $599,000. In addition, Metro pays the District $12,000 annuallv in lieu of taxes for service. That payment would end following annexation. In 1987, the District paid the City $606,500, annualized. The Boeing Company maintains its own fire fighting force. Additionally, Boeing and Kenworth (and perhaps other large companies) contract with Seattle for backup fire protection. Tukwila provides basic life support services to the area. The assets of the District consist of fire equipment having a replacement value of $670,964; reserve funds $400,000; and a fire station located at 12026 42nd Ave., South. (The $400,000 was apparently In reserve at the time the DEIS was prepared. It is not known what that balance is today.) According to the DEIS assets of the District approximate $1,000,000. All of these assets are located In Allentown (Subarea No. 4). There are 450 to 600 calls per year in the annexation area, of which an estimated 30 to 60 originate from Subareas No. 2 and No.3. Subarea No.3 (having 62% of the population of the combined Subareas 2 &, 3), Is estimated to generate from 19 to 37 calls per year. It Is further estimated that the two areas generate approximately $35,000 In revenues to the District, so less than that amount Is derived from Subarea No.3. The deletion of Subarea No.3 could create service problems, if only temporarily. Should the annexation election be successful, Subarea No.3 will be the only surviving portion of Fire District No. 1. The City Is expected to take title to all or virtually all of the District's assets. RCW 35A.l4.380 provides In part that a fire district In this situation may, by a vote of the people residing outside the annexed area, require the City to provide service in the balance of the District, and agree to pay the City a reasonable fee for this :lervice. ne problem Is that with a population of only 543 (most of whom are in the apartmelt complex) it is doubtful that there would be sufficient resources for a viable continuation of the District. This includes not oniy money, but It might be difficult to find three qualified people willing to run for election and serve as commissioners. The City of Renton has Indicated It will Initiate annexation proceedings promptly if Subarea No. 3 Is deleted. It Is expected that the period following the Tukwila annexation election until annexation to Renton can be completed will be brief. Services: Police The annexation as modified includes 12.8% of the population of King County's N-2 Patrol District. There are 6,353 police calls annually In the District, and It is assumed that these are substantially attributable on a population basis, Indicating approximately 800 calls per year in the annexation area. The estimated cost to King County In the annexation area Is $110,200 annually on a per call basis, The County provides one and sometimes two patrols In N-2. It Is unlikely that this level' of service couid be reduced following annexation. City response time is 2.5 minutes for Priority One (emergency) calls, and 7 to 8 minutes for non-emergency calls. King County response time is 7.4 to 9.1 minutes for Priority One calls, and 14.1 to 16.4 minutes for Priority Two. The City wouid PAGE FIVE -TUKWILA/P.O. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 .. " likely provide superior pOlice service, but at a cost estimated in the DEIS at $243,000 annually for six patrol officers, plus $40,500 for one crafflc officer, A patrol dr and motorcycle would be needed, and jail and communiciation service COSts would increase. Total cost to the City is estimated at $313,500. Little or no cost savings would be expected to accrue to the County. Services: Water There are five water purveyors in the annexation as proposed. The 'City of I Seattle serves the area north of the alignment of South 112th. Street and west of East Marginal Way, South. Water District No. 25 serves in the Allentown Area, and Water District No. 125 covers the area west of the Duwamish River and th'e small area .on the east side of the Beacon Coal Mine Road. The Creston Water Assot. serves a small area within Subarea No.2. Seattle also provides service along the I west side of Empire Way South and the City of Tukwila serves a home and several I businesses In Subarea No.3. Most of the study area south of the Boeing Access I Road, is within the Skyway Coordinated Water Supply Plan Boundary. The Plan was developed to simplify the varied water purveyor boundaries and resolve the resulting problems. \ These purveyors receive. water from the Seattle system. They serve varying pressure gradients requiring pump stations and pressure reducing valves. There are distribution mains in all deveioped portions of the annexation. \ Subarea No. 3 Is largely undeveloped and unserved. District No. 25, serving in the Allentown portion of Subarea No.2, has faclllties which are outdated and I inadequate. To bring them up to standard, a new 8 inch main and three fire hydrants I would be needed. The Skyway Plan recommends that future service to this area be provided by Seattle. Tukwila states in the PElS that the City would take I responsibility for most of the Districts' service area. (A small part Is served by Water District No. 125.) The City does not Intend to upgrade the system unless there is a health hazard or property owners request an upgrade and, presumably! would be willing to pay for It. \ The Creston Water Association serves 15 homes In ',he northern porI ion o~ Subarea No. 2 using a 2" main parallel to an existing 8" S/.lattle llne. The Skywa~ Plan again recommends service to this area by Seattle, which provides service in I the area surrounding the Association. The remaining existing water systems are, adequate to serve current and planned uses. Most of the Improvements that couid I be required Involve retrofitting existing systems to make appropriate connectlon~ to the Tukwila system, should the City elect to serve all or portions of the annexed I area. Following annexation, Tukwila could proceed under the statutes to take over l these service areas. Subarea No. 3 Is within Renton's Comprehensive Water Plan I and it has been reported that service in that area by Tukwila would be unduly expensive because of the required crossing of the railroad. Services: Sewerage Sewer service In the annexation Is provided by Seattle, Val Vue Sewer District, Skyway Sewer District, and the City of Renton. Some areas are stIlI relying upon septic tanks. Seattle serves most of Subarea No. I and Subarea No.2. and additional areas between Empire Way and the Burllngton-Northern Railroad. Val Vue serves two areas: one west and southwest of the Boeing Access Road and the other lying west of Interurban A venue. South. Skyway serves a small area In Subarea No. 3 as does the City of Renton. Most of Subarea No. 3 is without sewer service. as is PAGE SIX -TUKWILA/P.O. II (Apv./Mod. Add.) fI j'. • , , i I j j , i 1 'I I ~l i ,I " , i , i ) I I :'I ; 1 '1 1 .~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -' , " the Allentown area. The portions of the annexation area which are served are generally receivIng adequate service. Several homes along 49th Ave., So. have access to sewers but have never connected. Connection could be required if a health problem develops. Most of Empire Way, So. is not currently served. Septic tanks are in use in that area and some problems exist. Subarea No. 3 Is generally within Renton's Comprehensive Sewer Plan and it Is expected that Renton will Initiate annexation proceedings In the near future. Sewers would thereby be made available following application and creation of a Local Improvement District by. the property owners. The Allentown area has the most significant sewage disposal problems. The industrial areas In Allentown have sewers provided by Seattle, Tukwila and Val Vue, but the homes rely upon septic svstems and there have been a number of reported overflows. The County will not now aliow septic systems on lots smaller than 12,500 square feet, and many of the lots in the Allentown area are much smaller. It Is In a low-lying area close to the river which has a high water table. Sewers are reportedly needed In the Allentown residential area. Following annexation, a system could be Installed (presumably at property owners' expense) under the City's jurisdiction. The City has indicated It does not plan a system there unless the citizens request it or unless there Is a health hazard identified by the Seattle-King County Health Department. A sewer system In the Allentown area would cost an estimated $1,180,000. Following annexation. Tukwtia could contract with Seattle to continue providing service and simply allow I'al Vue and Skyway to continue to serve in their respective areas. Additionally, TukWila could assume all or part of those areas in accordance with state statutes. Tukwila would have responsibility for sewerage In the areas which are currently not served. Financial Effects: Tukwila The assessed valuation of the entire annexation area would be approximately $469 million. This Includes 5375 million from Subarea No. I, $8 million from Subarea No.2, $70 million from Subarea 4 and $15 million from Subarea No.3. As modified, the annexation inclUdes slightly in excess cf $453 million in assessed vjllue. This Is nearly $334,000 per capita, which Is in thE; range of ten times the County average. Surprisingly, there is not a substantial excess of revenues over required expenditures. The City reports that operation and maintenance for the General Fund and Street Fund would be $1,510.000: annual revenues would range from $1,945,000 to $2,157,000, resulting In net revenues that would range from $434,500 to $647,000 annually. However, the City estimates that approximately $12.920,000 In capital costs will be required In the annexation area, of which $4,760,000 would be Incurred within the first five years. If that $4,760,000 was financed by twenty-year 7.50% municipal bonds, the annual debt service would be $460,000, wiping out the net revenue for the low-end estimate. That provides no funds for the remaining $8,160,000 In required capital costs, nor does it aliow any funding for the 16th Ave. South Bridge. According to the City, ,taxes paid by homeowners for general municipal services (road district, library district, fire district, etc.) would drop from $3.54 per $1,000 assessed valuation to $2.88. This would create a annual savings of $33 on a $50,000 home. The total tax burden for the area annexed would be reduced by approximately $300,000 annually. Hore than half of that reduction would be Incurred by the Library I District. Total 1987 property taxes within the City of Tukwila were $1l.97 per $1,000. The rate within Fire District No. I ranged from $12.39 to $12.63 per $1,000. The PAGB SBVBN -TUKWILA/F.D. 61 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 '.' City's legal capacity for bonded Indebtedness is now $22 million and will be increased to $30 million as a result of the annexation. Plnanclal Effects: King County It is estimated that annual savings accruing to the County as a result of annexation could be approximately $725,000: Revenues Lost Current Expense Revenues Road District Revenues Tota I Revenues Lost: Savings Incurred C. I. P. Annua I Average Debt Service-Bridge (50"'0) Current Expense Fund Sa vlOgs Road District Savings Total Savings Incurred Net Annua I Savings $ 729,500 685,000 567,000 1,450,000 44,000 79,000 ($1,414,500) $2, 140,000 $ 725,500 -Current Expense ::avlOgs would be incurred primarll.y on police staffing for traffic enforcement. ,Ius some in parks maintenance. Debt service on the bridge Is based upon the assumption that replacement would cost $30 million financed ~y 20-year 7.5% bonds and that King County would pay one-half of the annual debt I service. The,$567,OOO IS Cased upon the $3.4 million now budgeted in the Six Year Capital Improvement rro~ram. I If the annexation Joes not take place, cost to the County will be much higher, assuming the full cost or the bridge would be borne by the County: Annual Revem'es Current Expense Reve nue Road District Revenues Tota I Revenues Annual Expenditures CIP Annua I Average Debt Service -Bridge (100%) C. E. Expenditures Road District Expenses Total Expenditures Net Annual (loss) $ 729,500 685,000 567,000 2,900,000 44,000 79,000 $ 1,414,500 $ 3,590,000 ($ 2,175,500) This estimate inc I udes on I y Current Expense and Road District expenditures direct I y attributable to the area. If services such as assessments, planning, and other administrative activities were added the amounts would be higher. 16th Avenue South Bridge The bridge is an unusual bascule-type, constructed so that the leaves retract, while being raised. It is 58 years old and has a cracked footing under one of thel PAGB mGHT -TUKWILA/P.D. #1 (Apv'/Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 piers. The piling supporting one end of the bridge is reportedly inadequate and one pier shifts slightly as a result of earthquakes, such as occurred In 1964. This causes the leaves to become misaligned. Adjustments are necessary, but the maximum extent of such adjustments is ilmited. The bridge could fail due to a substantial earthquake. Because of its age and the requirement that It be manned by a tender, annual cost for maintenance and operation has been estimated to be as high as $500,000. The .cost to replace the bridge has been estimated at $30,000,000 for a similar new operating structure. It Is evident from the maps that the bridge carries traffic which originates In the City of Seattle. Tukwila and unincorporated areas. It is likely that some significant percentage is generated by the Boeing Company and other industrial installations In the annexation area. Both the County and the City acknowledge that the bridge is properly a regional facility and its responsibility should be shared by several agencies, ~erhaps even Including the Port of Seattle due to the apparent need for an operating structure to accommodate the waterway. An attempt was made by King County and Tukwila to negotiate an agreement for sharing responsibilltv for this bridge. It Is not surprising that the attempt was unsuccessful. First. there is insufficient Information to support an agreement. The cost of the bridge cannot be determined because the nature of the structure required is unknown. The Coast Guard determines the height clearance above the waterway. It is posSIble that a fixed bridge could be installed. The cost of a flxedbridge (accord in,! to testimony) would be substantially less than $30 million. If a fixed bridge were permitted, (and assuming that both Its cost and operation would be far less than current costs), It might be wise to replace this bridge prior to failure. The monev now being spent for maintenance and operation, if applied to 20-year, 7.5% munlclpai bonds, would amortize costs of $5,000,000. Furthermore, the indirect costs corn ev commuters and others resulting from unexpected failure of the bridge couid ee extraordinary. In any case, an agreement between the responsible parties Will require considerably more information. Secondly, It Will be necessary. to Involve all of the responsible parties. It Is unfair to expect rhat the County and Tukwila will bear the total cost of the bridge. Much of thl" traClc the bridge carries is clearly to and from the City of Seattle. Seattle now has no motive to share in the cost of the bridge. However, contemplation of the results of failure might change the City's attitude. The advantage to participating in a planned r .. placement rather than an emergency replacement could be great. The debt service on a $30 million replacement structure (at 7.5% over 20-years amortized) would be $2.9 million annually. BOUNDAR Y MODIPICA nONS Boundary modifications herein' enacted are addressed In three categories. First Is the deletion of territory in Subarea No.3 as requested by Renton. The second Is the addition of territory in the vicinity of the 16th A venue South bridge. The' third Is a collection of small additions, deletions and clarifications to correct tax; lot splits, islands, and similar problems which resulted from the use of the Fire District No. I corporate boundary. A number of maps have been attached to this annexation to Illustrate the changes. They are Incorporated herein and made a part hereof by the following references. . PAGB NINB -TUKWILA/P.O. '1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 Subarea No.3 Deletion The Draft Environmental Impact Statement describes alternatives I, IA and II. This decision most closely approximates Alternative II, but includes all lands northeast of the river, while deleting Subarea 3. It differs from Alternative II l'y including the area east of 1-5 in the vicinity of the Boeing Access Road and 49th Ave., South. I According to the DEIS, deletion of Subarea 3 would be consistent with the logical extension of the City of Renton as recognized by the Renron-Tukwila boundary adjustment agreement. The Board has examined that document and concurs. The I common boundary in this area can, and should be, a ,:ontinuation of the east I right-of-way line of the Burlington-Northern railroa~. Statements by Renton indica~e that annexation by that City is probable and deSirable. The Board herein encourages Renton to pursue annexation as quickly as possible due to the fire protection isstie previously described. I I Both cities acknowledge that Renton is the logical provider of sewer service in Subarea 3. Renton currently serves the 250 apt. Empire Efltates Complex on Empit,e Way, So. The Skyway Critical Water Supply Study and the FEIS indicate that water service by Renton would be appropriate. Tukwila has indicated that it can be~t I provide fire protection and will do so by contract if requested by Renton. Utilit,Y service by TukWila in this area would be difficult becaust! of the substantial cos,t incurred for crossing the railroad. Most of Subarea No.3 Is in Renton's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Sewerage Plan. The majority of Subarea Nel. I 3 is physically removed from Tukwila and oriented to Renton due to the physical boundary created by the railroad. Also, steep slopes both physically and visually separate the area from Tukwila. The mayors of the two cities have agreed by memorandum to support an interlocal agreement which WOUld, among other things, establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting deletion o'f Subarea No.3. \ The legal description attached to this deCision deletes that portion of Subarea I No. 3 lying eal t of the right-ot-way line of :he Burlington-Northern Railroad and south of the converging right-of-way lines of Empire Way South and Interstate 5. 16th Avenue South Bridge Addition The annexation as submitted would have created an isolated service island I of unincorporated King County surrounded by Seattle and Tukwila, and divided by the river. This area is generally described as lying north 01' the extension of South I Director Street. Maintenance, operation and poliCing of the abbreviated road system I there would have remained a County responsibility, necessitating access throug~ two cities. Tukwila, In Its FEIS, states that the Duwamlsh River constitutes a natural I boundary for the northern portion of the annexation and, further, that It would not I be logical to extend annexation to the area west of the river. The City lists four options for dealing with the Island created: A. Tukwila could annex only the area east of the Duwamlsh and north to the City limits of Seattle. As proposed by the City, the bridge should be left within one Jurisdiction only. B. The boundaries of the ·annexatlon area could be extended to also include PAGE TEN -TUKWILA/P.O. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 the unincorporated land west of the Duwamish. This option would Ignore the natural boundary provided by the river and would create an awkward division of jurisdiction between Seattle and Tukwila, with Tukwlla having jurisdiction of a small area west of the river and having access only via 16th Avenue South. C. The northwestern boundary could be establlshed just south of 16th A venue South between the river and Seattle's city 11 mlts. This would also leave an Island, but simply a smaller one. Additionally, the bridge would remain entirelv the responslblllty of King County. D. The boundaries could remain essentially unchanged from those provided In the legal description. The boundary as filed would establlsh Tukwlla's corporate llmits generally along the east bank of the Duwamlsh River. The Surface Water Management Division of King County Department of Public Works takes the position that It is essential that the area annexed include the entire riverbank area to provide for proper bank stabillzatlon and maintenance In one jurisdiction. The Division claims that the entire river In the vicinity ot" t he 16th A venue South bridge should be annexed by one jurisdiction In order to provide for adequate maintenance and operation of the bridge. The Board agrees as to the centerline of the river. Furthermore, testimony indicates that state law provides that city jurisdiction Is Interpreted as extending to the centerllne of the river. However, the argument In favor of one entity having jurisdiction over the crldl(e must be balanced with the need for financial equity and other considerations. The Division argues on Page 49 of the FEIS that all flood protection, bank stabili::atlon. and river-related maintenance activities in the affected areas should become the responsibillty of Tukwila. The Board concurs and assumes that establishment of the boundary at the centerllne or thread of the river will accompllsh that objectl\·e. The Board agrees that the annexation boundary should be extended southerly 18 and westerly to the thread of the T)uwamlsh River, and that the annexation should be further modified bv extension northerly to Include all unincorporated lands lying 19 east of the thread of the river and north of the annexation boundaries as presented. This modification will have several effects. First, It wl'l substantially ellminate 20 an Impractical and illogical service area for King County. The Island Is not totally eradicated, leaving a small portion of South Park surrounded by the river and the 21 City of Seattle. In our opinion, this area Is part of the Seattle community and logical service area. Annexation to Tukwila would be Impractical. Although testimony 22 Indicated that annexation of this area by Seattle Is not llkely In the near term, the Board Is hopeful that It will someday be accompllshed. 23 Placing the bridge within two jurisdictions will create some management and 24 operation difficulties which will require the cooperation of the City and the County to resolve. King County has operated this bridge for many years and has the skilled 25 and experienced personnel to continue to do so. It Is strongly recommended that the County continue in this role· and that the City and the County formallze the 26 arrangement and share the operation and maintenance costs on an equal basis. 27 As previously discussed, It Is premature to expect an agreement among all of the appropriate agencies and parties as to the long-term solution to the bridge. 28 As an Interim measure, the Board has two objectives. One Is to avoid, as much as PAGB BLBVBN -TUKWILA/P.D. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 -.r' possible. a serious economic inequity. The other is to maintain or create a situation most conducive to fUture negotiation and agreement. It is the opinion of the Bo'ard that annexing all of the territory except the bridge would place an Inappropri~te burden upon the County. The opposite is also true. Foisting total responsibility upon Tukwila for an acknowledged regional facility would be inequitable. even With the substantial amount of assessed valuation to be obtained by Tukwila. As tan be seen in the fiscal analysis. the City will probably have a negative cash flowl as a result of the annexation even Without the added cost of replacement of the bridge. Should Tukwila be saddled with even as much as one-half of the debt service necessary to pay for a $30 million replacement. the negative fiscal effects on the City wo:uld be substantial and would require contributions well In excess in revenues stemming from the annexation. \ Under the existing situation the only governmental entity which has real motivation to solve the bridge problem Is King County. Following annexation. bbth the County and the City will necessarily be Involved. and it Is hoped that' a multiagencysharing of the responsibility might result. Islands and TaJ: Lot Splits I. Nortb Boeing Building: This large building is situated on the west side of East Marginal Way South. and is already divided by the Seattle corporate limits and the old Fire District Noll , boundary. There is no way to eliminate a tax lot diVision but it is possible to avoid , an additional boundary passing through the property. E:cpansion of the boundary northerly to the Seattle limits (see discussion of 16th Avenue South Bridge Addltl6n. Page Ten) will place approximately ninety percent of th Is building in Tukwila. I It is hoped that Tukwila and Seattle might accomplish a boundary adjustment to dele,te the balance of this property from Seattle and annex It to Tukwila. (See Exhibit B.l n. Associated Grocers: This property Is located along the west side of Martin Luther King Way So. (Empire Way So.) Just north of the Boeing Access Road. It Is partially In the City of Seattle. Again. It Is not possible to avoid a tax lot split but It is hoped that a boundaty , adjustment between the two cities can be accomplished. This decision does not amend the boundary as flIed. (See Exhibit C.) \ m. 51st Avenue Soutb: \ The City of Seattle corporate boundary divides several ·tax lots and follows tbe , centerline of 51st Avenue South In this vicinity. This creates two problems. First, , a state statute prohibits the use of street centerllnes as boundaries and the boundary , used In tbls annexation Is tberefore reduced to the Internal margin of the stree,t. This decision deletes from the Tukwila annexation the balance of the divided lots. , The evidence Indicates that the houses on those lots are within the City of Seattle, , while small, undeveloped portions of the lots are currently unincorporated. Futu~e annexation of these small parcels by the City of Seattle Is encouraged. (See Exhibit D.) I IV. 56th Place South: The Fire District No. I boundary divides approximately five lots. Portions are within I PAGE TWELVE -TUKWILA/F.D. Ut(Apv./Mod.Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ' .. -,/ ., the annexation. and portions would remain unincorporated. Deletion of the area lying east of Martin Luther King Way South (Empire Way South) in this vicinity will avoid the division of tax lots and establlsh a physical. logical boundary. (See Exhibit E.) V. Rainier National Bank: This property is located between East Marginal Way South and Interurban A venue South. The property would be divided by the annexation. According to testlmonv. the bank would prefer to be annexed. The balance of the bank property Is contained In the aforementioned Riverton Annexation. Because that annexation has already been flied, no change Is made by this decision. (See Exhibit F.l VI. Island of Lots 7, 8, 6; 9, Block 22, Hlllman Gardens: This Island Is totally surrounded by the annexation. It Is added to the annexation. (See Exhibit G.) YD. Island at AIrport Way: Railroad right-of-way, Interstate 5 right-of-way and Airport Way South right-of-way would become an Island between Seattle and Tukwila. It Is the decision of the Board that this Island be allowed In preference to creating an Illogical service area, which would result from a small portion of Airport. Way being located In Tukwila with the balance In Seattle. It Is hoped that the City of Seattle will annex the area. (See Exhibit H.) VIII. Island at 9120 East Marginal Way South: This Island Is totally surrounded by the annexation and Is added by this decision. (See Exhibit I.) IX. 42nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South: Small portions of both streets at their Intersection would be left out of the City of TukWila whereas the remaining portions of the street In this vicinity would be within the CIty. This would create an Irregular boundary and illogical service area. Consequel tly, this area Is added to the annexation. (See ExhIbit J.) OBJECTIVES This decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County tends to accomplish the pertinent objectives specified In RCW. 36.93.180. The particularly significant objectIves In this proposal are as follows: 1) Preservation of Natural NeIghborhoods and CommunIties: This approval will permit the voters of the Allentown and Duwamlsh neighborhoods to determine If they wish to Join the City of Tukwila. If they do so they will carry with them sufficient assessed valuation to enable the City to provIde needed services and capital Improvements. A number of municipal services would be Improved or made available, Including pollce protection, parks, and sanitary sewers. ThIs decision therefore tends to accompllsh the objective specified In RCW 36.93.180(1). 2) Use of Physical Boundaries: The annexation makes extensive use of the PAGE TIDRTEEN -TUKWlLA/P.D. Il(Apv./Mod.Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 ./ Duwamlsh River and Martin Luther King Way South (Empire Way South), 51st Avenue South, and other streets. This decision tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(2). \ 3) Creation and Preservation of Logical Service Areas: The annexation a~ modified restores to the City of Renton territory which properly should be served by that City in accordance with previous agreements and comprehensive plansl• Tukwila is capable of providing municlpai services, particularly police protectionl, at appropriate levels in the balance of the area. The City mayor may not opt t9 assume responsibility for utility services where it has an opportunity to do so. Should I the City deCide to pursue that option, the question would In most clrcumstance~ come before the Boundary Review Board. Consequently, It Is not addressed In detail in. this resolution. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the pertinent objective specified In RCW 36.93.180(3). \ 4) Prevention of Abnormally Irregular Boundaries: The Board has attempte~ to balance the need for regular boundaries with the desire to avoid creating uneconomical Islands between Tukwila and Seattle and other boundary Irregularities! Also, the western boundary is amended to follow the thread of the Duwamlsh Rlver.1 While the river Is not regular in all senses of the word, It Is certainly a recognizabl~ boundary. The balance of the western boundary will likely be expanded westward by future annexations which will eliminate any minor irregularities created In thl~ action. The addition of territory In the vicinity of the 16th A venue bridge willi eliminate a boundary Irregularity which would create service difficulties as well l as a fiscal Inequity. The deletion of Subarea No.3 not only Is consistent with previous agreements and adopted comprehensive plans, but will further establish a regular and recognizable boundary between Renton and Tukwila. Under Ideal circumstances, the Boundary Review Board might select to place all territory east of 1-5 in the City of Seattle. However, to delete that area In Its entirety from this annexation would create a major service problem for King County with no assurance that it would be resolved in the future. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified In RCW 36.93.180(4). 5) Ad!ustmrllt of Impractical Boundaries: The Board has implemented a number of adjus :ments to the pro,losed boundary. The use of the corporate limits of King County FIre Protection District No. I, which predated the freeway and other Improvements, created a number of problems. To the extent of Its authority, the Board has modified the boundary to ameliorate these problems. The logic of the adjustments should be self-evident upon examination of the maps and comments contained elsewhere in this decision. The same Is true In the, area of the territorial addition In the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge. This deCision therefore tends to accompllsh the objective specifIed In RCW 36.93.180(5). 6) Annezatlon to CIties of Unincorporated Areas which lire Urban In Character: Established land uses, zoning, governmental infrastructure and all pertinent comprehensive plans Indicate plainly that this area Is urban In character. This deCision therefore tends to accomplish the objectives specified In RCW :16.93.180(8). NOW, THBRBFORB. BB IT RBSOLVBD BY THB WASHINGTON STATB BOUNDARY RBVIBW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY THAT. for the above reasons, the action proposed In the Notice of Intention contained In said Flle No. 1450 be, and the same Is, hereby approved as modified by the addition and deletion of territory PAGB FOURTEBN -TUKWILA/F.D. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 as evidenced by the legal description which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. ADOPTED BY SAID BOARD by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 against this 8th day of September, 1988, and signed by me in authentication of Its said adoption on said date. FILED by me this ,rl-A day of September. 1988 WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY G~lalve Secretary /' PAGE FIFTEEN -TUKWILA/F.D. II (Apv./Mod. Add.) ,.-. , FILB NO. 145~. .KWILA/F.D. #1 BXHIBIT A WI Page SIxteen August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9-7-88«< LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUI:WILA -PROPOSED ANNEXATION (Fire District 11 Revised) BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of·the J. Buckley D.C.#42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 Nortn, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said Nor:n line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89°17'40" E 868.00 feet ~ore or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Soutnerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, wnich is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distanc! of approximately 3,400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88°32'07" E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit Line and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the :5eattle Clty Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No.2 (empire Way south); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South lO7th Street (also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and -1- FILE NO. 1450-TUKWILA/F.D. #1 Page Sevenr Legal Description for City Of Tukwila -Proposed Annexation (Fire District '1 Revised) August 31. 19BB »>REV.9-1-88<<< Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3. Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.M •• with the North line of South 107th Street. as conveyed to King County. Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet. more or less to the North line of said subdivision. also known as the North line cf the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue S.; Thence South along saId margin to the centerline of South 112th Street. being on the North line of Section 10. Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or 1 t!ss. to an i ntersecti on ~ i th the Sout~ line of South 113th Street. sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street and Seattle City Limit Line to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16. C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No.2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, . page B2, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Southerly on the West side of· said lot and Seattle City Limit Line to the North line of South 1l4th Street, sometimes caned August Street, as platted In said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and Its Easterly' extension approxl- q:l.O F~"J"h. 1t.e..-6 ..... -k.u .... + Md.;:"''' "..f ~I'irt. tU~ $oul).. (cst..fe.. 'Ru.&:It.:0i mately 1,100:811 Fee'! 'De \I:B n"'BP1' • Bf 811111 J; %1IR""R 'Ult; U pssipiii in ",lulla 1] of Pla%, , paga 23; Resards sf KinD '0'"t)'1 Tlioot' DuctilE;'] aloH9 said cehLc:' 'ii' of Block a to the Ito. tltRest aorur af Iooa' 14. If nii 811111 3, -2- ,'--" r,.' : Page Eighteer -" " FILE NO. 14SL :UKWlLA/F.D. #1 Legal Descrlptlon for Clty Of Tukwila -Proposed Annexatlon (Fire Dlstrlct '1 Revlsed) August 31, 1988 >>>Rev.9-7-88«< ."". Tl:eliee B 89 281'88" E along tile Itoi til 1111: 0;' said Lot 14 a dlsLuiiCE 01 93.03 Fcct; Tl:c"Ee B 49°17 'fO" I.e to bile SouthWEst,: 1) waigh: of EElL Place 8:; dne. ilaa II FlllI"I' 8[811111111B at tits IAtBPBee'le .. If ihl 11.,11110 l111t af said .. :\Usft'eWA ,',IPII U'I't1t the ullilpl hi af naia Aui 1180 a (,"",pi PI l'iS' ( ): flicase & 10 9 19'38" E ale::! sfltd ceiit,.1 'nIlE! a dlstenos Df &ifivC8 fl.', "ti"t "8" aild the EII8 OF 8ESeIUPfI6It. Tlieliee 3 49 2 11 38 Wa dlsMICC or 108.80 FeeL. "" .. ce Ii lonll!'ilOI' E a d"',allce ef 188,88 Feetl 11 ElitE! 49 9 17'98' 'w to ail l"ter!eet1sft hi, .. 'h8 ilwtht'9Eter'y FaFgip .... t .. iii iea •• Roni III 3, Thence Southeasterly along sal d Southwesterly mr rgl n to its 1 ntersec- t'A.$+ /t1,l..t'O{l.W"1 Ii" ... Q~ 'SR.-S' ..... .1. 11. .. N •• tI. ...... t .... 17 Co.~~ t 1 on wl th the ...... ~ ........... ~,...e .... _ ......... !ei .... ~i""'I'lM""'""""wr-8IC'f'j~+:-e -hu. '0+ 01 g2/)o 0 IQ5", ~o.i~ Ol',,-{-be.. +Mi1.LI" d. • .f.,'~ d.S '1:' "f,P'o." .. .J .. t, 310 f,,:/- Noc'h,. • .{. t\.~ N.rk. Mo."!i,,, S .... +I, 1.24+:" s+.-... t (o.S: m<.uu,.,.J <:.1....., $4';'/ ea..t If lnl liUlill':!'" i:'l If &uillA 11, ia" .. ehl? 119 lie. th; Ra::g: I Esst, \lull:. R,,11J:· • .< w"''1 .1.,,,,,, * SR.-S)i Tti'<n •• U •• i .1.,,! sal! Us: tl: Right ur W5; LIIi! L&dil liilersecLluii "ttl the EastL.1; RIJht of ':IsS tille of !ittte Read iii Thence Southerly along sald Easterly Right-of-Way Llne to an lntersec- tlon wlth the North 11ne of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Townshlp 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence contlnulng along sald Easterly Right-of-Way Llne of State Road 5 to an lntersectlon wlth the Northeasterly Right-of-Way Line of the Burllngton Northern Ral1road Company (Paclflc Coast Ral1road): Thence South~:~Ong sald Northeasterly Rlght-of-Way Llne to an lntersectlon with the North 11ne of the Southeast 1/4 of said Sectlon 14: Thence contlnulng along said Northeasterly Right-of-Way Llne to an lntersectlon with the Easterly productlon of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted ln Hillman's Seattle Garden Trllcts and vacated under Tukwlla Ordlnance No, 101, sald line belng also the el(lst1ng Tulcwlla -3- PILE NO. 14S 0-T'-"'W1LA/P.D. HI j. j Page Twentv '.,,;.' Legal Descr1pt10n for City Of Tukwila -Propos~d Annexation (Fire District .1 Revised) August 31, 19B8 >>>Rev.9-7-88«< , Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 07 Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington: Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said ~outhwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition: Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and T~kwlla City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thenc~ Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Nor':hwesterly along' said City Limit Line of Tukwila to the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; Thence North along the West line of said right-of-way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly exten- Sion of the South l1ne of Tract 22, of Riverside Interurban Tracts: as recorded in Vol. la, page 74 of Plats, Recorcs of King County, Washington; Thence West along said South line and exter.slon to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South l24th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Vol. 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington: Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 7B501B as -5- FILE NO. 1450-TUKWILA?P.D. #1 Page Twentv· Legal Description for City Of Tukwila -Proposed Annexation (Fire District '1 Revised) Augus t 31, 1988 >>>Rev.9-7-88«< recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat: Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; "''':'\''~;I' ':>'3 /,),;1<-, K-.4,?"-if ~+, tL·.,'" ; ~c:,:,cl Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line o~.Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and waterwav, to the North 11 ne of Section 32, Townshl p 2.l, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WP:(ES)P5 -6- > J FILE NO. 1450-TUKWlLA/F.D. HI , ~ Exhibit B \1j0 Page Twentv-Two :-.. CI " c ::s o .a c o / /' // , .- < 9'/ ~ ,.,. / C C .- ~ " ~CIAnD GRDCER5 I 35 A~, m, ... iM =--_ ~- :.; - -U.IDI ('-\\·OR.JH'r'f.ES TAUT 0 V 1t6£c1<ING CO, • , '-l./~ . & HAAPLA' ----- ~ ~ '" -,II I ".;: r, " ~ __ _ ..} I , '. I, ~ :~ .. ,~ I~ , I , , ': ~ I~ i-'. ',. ," It NORFOLK ST. ~.J' ----- [J --- Fire District #1 B \ Gov't. Lot 31.77 Acres ~ ~ / ~ 1/ t I ~~~r'':'' J,J. GABBERT "1 \ .// ' .... -------:.'" ---- 405 AC. EASEMENT TO CITY OF SeA TTL£ _____________ ...J. •.• AURELIO DESIMONE rut PILB NO. 1450-TUKWlLA/P.D. ill Bzhlblt C Page Twenty-Three a 69 70 \"1 FILE NO. 1450-TUKWlLA/P .D. #1 Bxhlblt D Page Twenty-Four ... ... ... , ... ... , , , "' ... "', , '" , " <~ , '"" \ " , \ \ \ , , .-. 2625 23 \~~\M I \ \ \ \ \ 1 ~ \ 30\ ~9 \ ' : . '\ ' < ~8 \ ' I . < ·27 \. : ',2GIzs \ \ : i ;23 \ 22 , FILB NO. 14S0-TUKWU.A/P.D. #1 Bxhlblt B Page Twenty-Five ~ \ i ' \ -J. _____ 't.:= \ \ \ \ ~ \t;1\ \r;:,tt( ----'I~ .... FlL3 NO. 1450-TUKWILA/F.D. /II Bxbibit F Pagll Twenty-Siz , . .. r-~ iii: I I I ·---i-d~-: I • I r 451 I I , , , , 1 • , , , , , 1 1 . . 1 ... 1 .. J ~ • t . -- ,00 - I' LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 -15 ;"UCK "ARTS ; :9 Ac IV£H T L. I -, 8 PILB NO. 1450-TUKWILA/P.D. #1 BXblblt G Page Twenty-Seven \ ,0 \-," \ -----.-.-.-.~, '., \ ' --t",,~ \\ 0, n a I "\ \', \ " \ \ ) /! '------I / I , I I J -,,' / NOLN,""7i~~fic;,~~~~~~~~~~ , , \ , , \ Z:. '" ~ '~ \ -', ..... . " .,., ~ \ 1:- \ \" i ~ I R P ~O ~1 R T \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ PILH NO. 1450-TUKWlLA/P.D. 'I Bxhiblt H Page Twenty-Blgbt '. ! , @ "'" 16.531. --------~~~..:::..:;..:~ ~ ~' T .... 0) o o 'It ..... 2 tACT 4 ~ ,,,.,, f'J.'''' , , COMPANy :, .0IlNG A • I n'fflrD'" 1",.,110 '''liS/ON , ,,... 6UII/lINGl Ce"tJlIII"'tJ ,.' .... y. R.A C '" ~o. 38 ".::> '~I---~=~~~~ N ._-r<>--c;. __ -."u·",f ..... v-./ ~. • 1";11" PILH NO. 1450-TUKWILA/P.O. #1 Hzblblt I Page Twentv-Nlne ~,.! ........ ~~ ,~). " • • • , • , , . ,- \ 0\,1 \ • • . ' .-• ...... -.... ....... : -...... f$ "-':::::. ~v 1.2 ... , > -~ l, , ~. N , , N' <> "'I ,.. ..., ---- !" /U .: I C"I Z 71!"1 :r raz >46- ~--S 6S-Z -------:.-::: --~-- , • , A .' .. 11. •• J...,.--------:-, .N~~"40-1 9E Ii I _ I> ...... . . ' .:: '" .. ~~~~ .... ... -.. : -I , I • • • ."fII) 11-• • • -..; •. ~ 'I' f -''<.; ., . •• • -.. ,-.~ "':' "'t" • I','#, ..J ..... '" J' ... ?~ 0.. '" ... ~ ,~'C.~ ~ .. --- ilt ~. 01, .. ::. '.,.~ • & ... ~. 0, ~. ,. . '" ..... FILE NO. \450-TUKWILA/P.O. ,\ Bzhlblt J Page Thirty • · , · . ... hI : ..... ' ',: . : : I " : · , CITY -JF RENTON >.\1',' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM August 26, 1988 Mayor Clymer Members of the City Council Mike Parness Maxine Motor Carrie Trimnell Tukwila's Proposed Annexation of King County Fire District #1 On August 24, 1988, the King County Boundary Review Board directed its staff to prepare a written decision on the above referenced annexation indicating the Board's deletion of the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right-of-way, also known as "subarea 3" (please refer to the attached map). The Board is scheduled to formally adopt this decision on September 9, 1988. After the Board's decision is finalized, the City of Renton will be legally able to process the annexation of all or a portion of this area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at x2552. ct:dsk3c:fdl brb5 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2552 I p. ~M~a~y~2~3~'LI9~8~8~ ________ __ Renton City Council Minutes Page 166 LID: 330, Grady Way Project Streets: SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Joint Project with Tukwila Community Services Committee Annexation: King County Fire District # I to Tukwila Public Works Department requested segregation of assessment for Parcel 4 owned by Puget Western in LID 330, Grady Way Improvement Project, due to right-of-way acquisition by City for Oakesdale Avenue SW and P-I Channel. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Public Works Department requested review of inter local agreement with City of Tukwila for funding and construction of the SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard roadway, as agreed to at joint meeting between Tukwila and Renton City Councils. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for review and resolution. Community Services Committee recommended that the Policy Development Department continue negotiations with Tukwila to delete the area east of Burlington Northern railroad tracks from Tukwila's proposed annexation of Fire District #1, and that the City of Renton initiate annexation proceedings for the area in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Legal: Topless Dancing Legislation Resolution #2723 Public Works: Assessments for Parcel #4 of LID #330 Resolution #2722 Finance: Banking Services Resolution #2721 Public Works: Rainier A venue South/Airport Way South Improvements and Airport Paving Resolution: #2720 Legal: Topless Dancing Legislation Vouchers ADJOURNMENT OS/23/88 Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: A ordinance was read amending Chapter I, "Business Licenses" of Title V Re Establishment of Regulatory Standards and Licenses for Businesses et al that provide Adult Entertainment in the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of the following resolutions: A resolution was read segregating assessments for Parcel #4 of LID #330. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. A resolution was read designating the demand deposit account depository and authorizing execution of an agreement thereof. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute documents requesting allocation for Federal funds for Rainier A venue South/Airport Way South safety improvements, and airport pavement rehabilitation. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. In response to Councilman Stredicke's request for written response indicating whether or not this item is on the priority list for the six year street program, Mayor Clymer noted matter will be referred to staff for response. A resolution was read adopting findings of fact in support of an ordinance regulating and licensing the businesses, managers, and employees that provide adult entertainment in the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PR};SENTED. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 40775 through 41131 in the amount of $1,343,878.82, having departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 40779, 40784-40786 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 7:46 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 23, 1988 KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION (Referred April 4, 1988) The Community Services Committee discussed the City of Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1 and the recommended interlocal agreement between the two cities. The Community Services Committee recommends that Renton staff be directed to work on the proposed interlocal with Tukwila staff rather than negotiate Council to Council. The Community Services Committee recommends that the proposed interlocal agreement address the deletion of the area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way from Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1. Upon the deletion of the subject area, the Community Ser.vices Committee recommends that the City of Renton initiate annexation proceedings on the property in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry. The Community Services Committee recommends that Renton reaffirm its opposition to the siting of an incinerator at the Black River Quarry given the obvious on-and off-site impacts. The Community Services Committee recommends that Renton reaffirm the ranking of the Oakesdale Avenue extension from State Route 900 to Monster Road as a high priority in the Valley Transportation Improvement Program. The Community Services Committee recommends that Renton reaffirm its position requiring annexation as a condition of sanitary sewer service connection. ~~~~~~ \J4-"~~~.J Toni Nelson, Vice-Chair Thomas Trimm, Member ct:dsk3 b:f d 1-15 • May 16. 1988 PUD: Final, Victoria Hills Phase II, FPUD-042-85 Citizen Comment: Shook -N. 24th Street Encroachments Rezone: Good Shepherd Group Home, R -0 I 5-88 Citizen Comment: Lowe - Sunset Boulevard NE Phase II CONSENT AGENDA Claim: Rieck, CL-26-88 Claim: Scappini, CL-27- 88 Claim: Pitts, CL-28-88 LID: 329, SW 43rd Street Finance: Banking Services Contract Transfer Annexation: Fire District .. #1 to Tukwila Renton City Council Minutes Page 158 Jeff Lukins, 1·113 S. 23rd Street, Renton, presented correspondence regarding status of the Victoria Hills Phase II Final Planned Unit Development. He indicated disagreement with information cited in letter from Building & Zoning Director Ron Nelson to City Council, dated 4/11/88, setting 01/14/89 as the PUD expiration date, and using the phrase "construction moratorium" to refer to 1986 work stoppage. Correspondence from former Mayor Shinpoch and City Attorney Warren were presented which referenced a completion date of 7/14/88 for the project, with option of one-year extension. Referencing the work stoppage, Mr. Lukins felt that it applied only to the time limit constraining substantial construction, not to the deadline for completion of the PUD. Regarding probable request for extension by the developer which residents oppose, Mr. Lukins requested that the City confirm how an extension is requested, and indicate whether the decision to grant an extension by the Hearing Examiner is appealable. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS MA TIER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR INVESTIGATION AND REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Helen Shook, 1405 N. 24th Street, Renton, expressed dissatisfaction with staff decision not to enforce requirement that residents remove all walls, hedges, and fences not complying with regulations from public right-of-way. (See Transportation Committee report.) Judy Nichols, 1118 Olympia Avenue NE, Renton, questioned posting, publishing and notification procedures for public hearing on Good Shepherd rezone on Olympia Avenue NE. Information was provided by City Attorney Warren and Mayor Clymer. It was also noted that no further testimony would be taken nor letters of protest read into the record at City Council meetings on this subject since Council would be the reviewing body for any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the rezone. Paul Lowe, 402 Grandey Way, Renton, suggested that plantings be added along Sunset Boulevard to beautify the street and strengthen recently ins taIled rock waIl. He suggested that an island be instaIled in the wide intersection at Grandey, Sunset and Bronson to relocate bus stop which is now very close to his residence. He offered to work with the City Council to develop plans for these improvements. Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted: by one motion which foIlows the listing. At Council request, Item 7.f., Library Board appointment, was removed for separate consideration. Claim for damages in the amount of $545.36 filed by Clark Rieck, 1210 Pierce Place NE, Renton, for damage to vehicle paint aIlegedly caused by heat from saw used by City crew on concrete slab (05/03/88). Refer to Q1y Attorney and insurance service. Claim for damages in the amount of $72.49 filed by Dennis Scappini, I308 Dayton, Renton, for damage to alignment allegedly caused by hitting potholes in street under construction (05/03/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim for damages in the amount of $3,010.45 filed by Arley Pitts, 2827 Mt. View Drive, Renton, for damage to belongings allegedly caused by failure of City crews to block side sewer before flushing sewer main (03/08/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Finance Department requested ordinance authorizing rollover of $600,000 interim financing for LID 329, SW 43rd Street. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) . Finance Department requested cancellation of existing banking contract with U.S. Bank (formerly Old National Bank) and execution of new agreement with Rainier Bank, second low bidder for services. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. (See later action.) IMayor Clymer submitted notice from King County Boundary Review Board of public hearing to be held on 6/16/88 at 7:30 p.m. at Foster High School Cafeteria to consider proposed annexation of Fire District #1 to City of Tukwila. Refer to Community Services Committee. ,0:' "t'. , CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Diy/Board .. Executive Staff Contect .. Mike Parness SUBJECT: Boundary Review Board notice, proposed annexation of Fire District # 1 EXHIBITS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Community Services Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required .•. Amount Budgeted ....... . SUMMARY OF ACTION: FOR AGENDA OF: May 16, AGENDA STATUS: Consent .•....... Public Hearing .• Correspondence .. Ordinance ....... Resolution ..•... Old Business ..•. New Business .... Study Session ... Other •.......... APPROVALS: Legal Dept •••... Finance Dept. ••• Other .......... . Transfer/Amendment .. Revenue Generated ... X 1988 NOlice of Hearing, Proposed Annexation of Fire District #1. There will be a heari(lg on this subject at 7:30 pm on Thursday, June 16, 1988 at Foster High School (4242 S. 144th, Seattle) for tne purpose of considering the referenced proposed annexation. II · Ref. 4.15.87 TO: FROM: IN RE: Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136tll S.E., Sliite 122 /lel/evlle, Wil 98(X)6 'letc!,i","c (206) 296-7096 April 29. 1988 CITY OF RENTON G. BRICE MARTIN. Executive Secretary NOTiCE OF HEARING FILE NO. 1450 CITY OF TUKWILA Proposed Annexation (K.C.F.P.D.#l) [ "--/; f:7"T;-f\'(;-rl::'~I::':----- \ C o __ ',_" 1._ .• , .... I I .. " .: Ei8i3 I I el,: u· :. .... i ,_ .. "._ ...... ",. __ .... " .i~.q~::l~:·';.I.! .. " .. "__ ~ Enclosed please find a Notice of Hearing to be held by the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County as prescribed in RCW 36.93.160(1). Rule I-D of the Rules of Practice and Procedure for the Board state as follows: "The Chief Clerk shall ascertain which governmental units are required by law to be notified of each hearing, and shall request from each governmental unit so affected a written statement to be submitted within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing of such request as to its position relative to the Notice of Intention." If you wish additional information relative to this proposal, please let me know. GBM/pr Enclosure as Noted CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ref. 4.15.87 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S. E" Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296-7096 NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO .. 1450 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County will hold a public hearing at 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, June 16, 1988, at the Foster High School Cafeteria, 4242 So. 144tb, Seattle, Wasblngton, for the purpose of considering the proposed annexation to the City of Tukwila of an area known as "Fire District No. I", all In King County, Washington, said area being generally described as: The boundaries of King County Fire Protection District No. I. (A copy of the full legal Is available In the office of the Board.) AT SAID TIME AND PLACE, any and all Interested persons may appear and be heard with reference to said proposal. DATED at Bellevue, Washington, this 22nd day of April, 1988. WASHINGTON STAT RY/};):J.BOA.RD FO m~t~ G. BRICE HARTIN, BOUNDARY KING COUNTY :u!h..J- tlve Secretary ,.. May 16. 1988 Public Works: Damaged Sidewalk on S. 3rd Place Streets: Arterial Street Study Streets: Arterial Street Study Appointment: Library Board CORRESPONDENCE Annexation; Fire District # I to Tukwila, Spider Staging Rezone: Good Shepherd Group Home, R-015-88 OLD BUSINESS Transportation Committee Streets: South 192nd Street Cross Valley Arterial Streets: Carr Road Designation (Covenant Church Annexation) Renton City Council Minutes Page 159 Public Works Department relayed citizen complaint that uneven sidewalk at 220 S. 3rd Place is creating safety hazard. Refer to Transportation Committee. Traffic Engineering/Public Works Department requested authorization for execution of Interlocal Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation and agreement with consultant to complete Arterial Street Study. Refer to Transportation Committee. Traffic Engineering/Public Works Department requested funding in the amount of $150,000 to complete Arterial Street Study. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Mayor Clymer reappointed John Simpson, P.O. Box 34, Renton, 98057, to a five year term on the Library Board to expire 6/1/92. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Letter was read from Charles A. Shaw, staff counsel for Spider Staging, 13536 Beacon Coal Mine Road S., Seattle, requesting input from cities of Renton and Tukwila regarding solutions to sanitary sewage disposal problems on the site to enable an informed decision to be made on whether the company supports or opposes proposed annexations. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO COMMUNITY SERViCES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Letters were referred to the official file opposing proposed rezone to G-I in area of Good Shepherd ·Group Home on Olympia Avenue NE from James and Golma Allen, 3406 NE 11th Street, Renton; Russell W. Fulgham, 1018 Olympia Avenue NE, Renton; John and Joyce Locke, 3407 NE 11th Street, Renton; and Mr. and Mrs. Stanley A. Wilcoxen, 4107 NE 24th Street, Renton. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO OFFICIAL FILE, R-015-88. CARRIED. In accordance with previous information provided by City Attorney and Mayor Clymer to Mrs. Nichols (Page 158), additional 13 letters of protest presented at the meeting were also referred to the official file. Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a recommendation on the South 192nd preliminary route location study: I) Council adopt alternative 4 as the preferred alternative subject to the outcome of the environmental analysis. 2) Council authorize staff to negotiate an interlocal agreement with King County to develop an environmental impact study on the project. If these recommendations are adopted, the next step is for King County and the City to conduct the necessary environmental studies, including an Environmental Impact Statement. King County has allocated $50,000 in their 1988 Annual Budget to conduct these studies. The staff will negotiate an interlocal agreement with King County to perform the EIS and report back to the Council periodically. The Committee further recommends that the Administration be authorized to negotiate an interlocal agreement with King County for performance of the necessary environmental studies and that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement once it is negotiated. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report indicating concurrence in the staff recommendation to use the name of South Carr Road as the street name in the newly annexed area east of Valley Medical Center from Talbot Road to Benson Road (Covenant Annexation). Strict adherence with the adopted grid system will cause undue confusion. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. etJ~~tUu~ r-r-Dr;\;:-;-;-:-=-=-£_VSJ-,1.?-~ RECEIVED f"tlanta tv1AY 5 1988 CITY OF kENIUN CITY COUNCIL Baltimore --. Boston Members of the Tuk~/il a City Counsel Hon. Gary Van Dusen Mayor, City of Tuk~/il a Mr. Byron G. Sneva, Director Department of Publ ic ~Iorks City of Tukwil a 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington, 98188 Re: Sanitary Sewer Service May 2, 1988 Members of the Renton City Council Hon. Earl Clymer Mayor, City of Renton Di rector Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill S. Renton, Washington, 98055 K. Cnty. Fire District #1 Annexation Tukwil a Pl anning cases 88-1-CPA, 88-1-R and 88-1-CA Ladies and Gentlemen: Spider Staging Corporation is located near the southern boundary of Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1, kno~tn to Tukwila's Planning Department under the above case numbers. Our manufacturing plant is located at 13536 Beacon Coal Mine Road South, which places us to ·the East of the railroad right-of-way bisecting the annexation area, and near the southern end of the proposed annexation area. The issue of immediate concern to our Company, on which we requested the direction of Tukwila's City Council and administrative officials by my letter of April 4, 1988, has to do \'lith sanitary sewage disposal. At present, our manufacturing facility generates only a small amount of "domestic" effluent (we have some 9S employees at Headquarters), which has been disposed of via an on-site drainfield for many years. However, King County's Department of Health has determined that the drainfield is in a failing condition, and has directed us to find some other method of lawful sewage disposal. We must take action on this matter in the very near futu reo Since annexation by either Renton or Tukwila would probably impact our plant site in a number of ways, we were most interested to find (via the SPIDER STAGING CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters 13536 aaacon Coal Mine Rd. S. SaaUla, Washington 98178 (206) 255-8267 Chicago Cleveland Detroit Houston Los Angeles , New Orleans New York Orlando Philadelphia San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Vancouver, B.C. Washington, D.C. -... ·:.·,; .. .-Jv .. Renton Chronicle article of April 29) that properties in this vicinity are now under discussion by both City Councils as possible areas for annexation. We have also noted a proposal referred to as the "Oaksdale Connector" and have made an inqui ry about it; to date, hoy/ever, v/e've not received a formal reply to either inquiry. We understand that Tukwila is unwilling to directly address the question of sewage disposal for our area at this time, and we know nothing of improvements to roads and utilities that were mentioned in the Chronicle article. Since these sorts of services are the principal justification for an annexation, we are most concerned about the respective positions of the two cities, which at present we do not understand. We believe that a single comprehensive utility system for the entire area, funded by revenue bonds, councilmanic bonds or general obligation bonds, would be far and away the best solution for a problem that plagues not only Spider, but a number of other industrial and residential properties as well. We would like to be informed of the solutions proposed by your, two Governments to the problems facing us, so we may make an informed decision on whether we should oppose the annexations under discussion. As you might imagine, it is critically important that we receive a prompt and concise response to the foregoing; our thanks for your attention. We would appreciate your making this letter a part of the record of the next public hearings held on the matter by both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. cc: Seattle Rendering Works King County Dept. of Health April 18. 1988 Acquisition: Reservoir and Storm Detention Site, NE Sunset Boulevard (Clements) Citizen Comment: Nicoli -Kennydale Water Lines Latecomer Agreement: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, #S-415 Community Serylces Committee Community Event: Renton River Days Annexation: North Soos Creek (Fairwood) Annexation: Black River Quarry and King County Fire District # J Annexation to Tukwila SPECIAL PRESENTATION Annexation: Black River .. Quarry and Fire District # J Annexation to Tukwila Renton City Council Minutes Page 128 Utilities Committee Vice-Chairman Mathews presented a report concurring in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to purchase 9.4 acres of property located at 4901 NE Sunset Boulevard (east of Duvall Avenue NE) from John Clements in the negotiated amount of $225,000 for future water reservoir and regional storm water detention pond site. The Committee also recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said escrow instructions and any other papers necessary for the purchase of said property. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIlTEE REPORT. Chairman Mathews explained future use of the lower one-half of the site for storm drainage detention system and the upper half for water storage area. MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Vice-Chairman Mathews presented a report indicating that based upon an independent water sample analysis performed by Laucks Testing Laboratories, Inc., Seattle, test results have shown no detectable health contaminants were found in Mrs. Nicoli's water. Mrs. Nicoli has been provided with a copy of the analysis; and no further action is required on this matter. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Vice-Chairman Mathews presented a report recommending concurrence in the Public Works Department recommendation to approve sanitary sewer latecomer agreement for Crown Pointe Apartment Project, 3788 NE 4th Street, #S-415. Also recommended was authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIlTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report recommending Council concurrence in the request for waiver of fees for permits during Renton River Days, August 10-17, 1988. The Committee also recommended concurrence in the request to locate the ornamental River Days windsocks on City light poles for approximately one month from July 9 through August 14, 1988. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIlTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report recommending acceptance of the petition from the residents of Lake Desire, Spring Lake and Shady Lake areas opposing the inclusion of these rural areas in the proposed North Soos Creek Annexation, and recommending that the Council delete the area east of 164th Avenue SE from the annexation scope. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIlTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report recommending that the Policy Development Department present the issues of the Black River Quarry and the City of Tukwila'S proposed annexation of King County Fire District # I to the full Renton City Council on Monday, April 18, 1988. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIlTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (Presentation follows.) For the purpose of receiving direction from the City Council prior to joint meeting with Tukwila City Council on 4/28/88, Policy Development Director Larry Springer discussed the possibility of annexing the Black River Quarry area, candidate for proposed King County garbage incinerator site, located in King County between the cities of Renton and Tukwila. He provided background information, noting importance that the proposed site be annexed either to Tukwila or Renton for purposes of land use authority, and reviewed Council alternatives as follows: I) support Tukwila's annexation of all of Fire District #1, including Black River Quarry site; 2) initiate annexation proceedings on all of the properties within Fire District #1 lying east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; 3) initiate annexation proceedings on property east of South 133rd Street (if extended); or 4) initiate annexation proceedings on the properties generally located between Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South and the existing Renton limits. Mr. Springer recommended that Alternative #4 be approved to initiate an annexation of the Black River Quarry area (from 68th Avenue South east to the existing Renton limits) as soon as legally feasible, such decision to be APril 18. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 129 clearly defined in an interlocal agreement with Tukwila to acknowledge deletion of the area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1. Reasons for the recommendation are that annexation would: I) allow Renton to control rezone and site plan decisions and mitigate concerns with environmental impacts; 2) give the City full control of the Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South project north from SW 43rd Street to SR-900 (Empire Way); 3) allow control of land uses in Oakesdale Avenue/Empire Way corridors; 4) protect future development potential of Black River Corporate Park south of the Quarry site; and 5) allow connection of sanitary sewers to uses in that area currently experiencing septic failure. Drawbacks to Alternative #4 are: possible full funding responsibility for improving Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South; and need for new fire station and increased fire protection service to expanded area. Councilman Reed opposed annexation due to financial impact from full construction of Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South, approximately $4 million, and legal fees to oppose incinerator siting. Discussion was held ; regarding possible consequences of annexation, existing zoning in the area, I preference of Tukwila for Renton to annex the area since services and I utilities will not be provided by Tukwila on east side of Burlington Northern tracks, and whether King County Boundary Review Board can invoke ; jurisdiction on the annexation. Following discussion, Council members I expressed reservations with making a final decision at this time, requested I additional time to review information, expressed desire to discuss concerns I further with Tukwila officials on 4/28/88, and requested that if the Black River Quarry is annexed to Renton that Tukwila be asked to participate in costs to oppose incinerator siting. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Ordinance #4150 LID: 330, Grady Way Project Final Assessment Roll Ordinance #4 I 5 I Annexation: Covenant Church Rezone ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Death of Former Mayor A very Garrett Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: An ordinance and summary ordinance were read approving and confirming the assessments and assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 330 in the amount of $584,475.00 for widening the roadway to 56 feet curb to curb, construction and installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, water lines, street lights, traffic control and other necessary appurtenances in the vicinity of SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW west to the Grady Way bridge, Renton, King County, Washington, by doing all work necessary on connection therewith, levying and assessing the amounts therefor against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land and other property as shown on said assessment roll as confirmed by the City Council; and providing for the payment of such assessments into the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 330 of the City of Renton, Washington, as created by Ordinance No. 3890. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4 A YES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, MATHEWS, REED, TRIMM. I NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located along the side of SE Carr Road between Talbot Road South and 104 th Avenue SE (if extended) to R-I, single family residential, classification; Covenant Church Annexation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED. Mayor Clymer advised that over 500 people attended funeral services held this date for former Mayor Avery Garrett, who died on April 13 after suffering from cancer and heart ailments. He acknowledged Senator Garrett's many contributions to the City of Renton as Mayor and Council member as well as State 'legislator, and indicated he will be greatly missed by all who knew him. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT April 18, 1988 PROPOSED NORTH SOOS CREEK ANNEXATION (Referred April 4, 1988) The Community Services Committee recommends that the Renton City Council accept the petition from the residents of the Lake Desire, Spring Lake and Shady Lake areas opposing the inclusion of these rural areas in the proposed North Soos Creek Annexation and that the Council delete the area east of 164th Avenue SE from the annexation proposal. BLACK RIVER OUARRY and KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION (Referred April 4; 1988) The Community Services Committee recommends that the Policy Development Department present the issues of the Black River Quarry and the City of Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District # 1 to the full Renton City Council on Monday, April :18, 1988. L!~ c;(j. '£--<-cL -<;J@{n Reed, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice-Chair Thomas Trimm, Member THE BLACK RIVER QUARRY AREA An Argument for Annexation April 18, 1988 INTRODUCTION The Renton and Tukwila City Councils have scheduled a joint meeting for Thursday, . April 28, 1988 to discuss topics of mutual interest, including the extension of Tukwila's Strander Boulevard east to a connection with SW 27th Street, and an interlocal planning agreement to govern annexation activity in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry. What follows is an outline of the salient points and a recommendation concerning the inter local agreement issue. BACKGROUND • • • • Renton and Tukwila have an interlocal agreement which requires joint review of all future annexations east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, north and west of the existing Renton corporate limits, and south of South 132nd Street. This agreement also establishes the Burlington Northern Railroad right- of -way as the logical common boundary between Renton and Tukwila south of Container Corporation. Tukwila provides fire protection service on a contractual basis to King County Fire District # I (see Figure I) and is processing a petition to annex the District via the election method. The boundaries of the District extend across the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way to the existing Renton corporate limits on the east. Tukwila anticipates that the election on the annexation will be held in November 1988. Renton's former Mayor Shin/1och, current Mayor Clymer and Tukwila's Mayor Van Dusen have, on several occasions, discussed service provision problems in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry and have agreed that the area should be mutually recognized as lying within Renton's municipal service area and potential annexation area. Renton and Tukwila staffs prepared a draft interlocal agreement acknowledging the Black River Quarry area as lying within Renton's potential annexation area, and agreeing to jointly request that the Boundary Review Board delete the subject area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1 (see Figure 2). THE BLACK RIVER QUARRY An Argument for Annexation April 18, 1988 • • • Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South is the northwest entrance to Renton and should present a favorable image to people as they enter the community. Through annexation, Renton could control and potentially "clean up" land uses in the Oakesdale Avenue and Empire Way corridors. The Quarry, as well as potential future heavy manufacturing and industrial uses in the subject site, are examples of these problem land uses which can ultimately affect the City. Black River Corporate Park is in Renton immediately south of the Quarry site. Renton is promoting that development as one of the best office park developments in the City, if not in South County. Incompatible land uses to the north in the Quarry area will significantly decrease the value and future development potential of the office park. Spider Staging, an industrial land use in the Quarry area, has been declared as having a health emergency by King County Health District due to a failing septic tank system. The firm would like to connect to a sanitary sewer system as soon as possible, and since Renton is the preferred service provider in that area, annexation would simplify the process of providing sewer service to that property. The Administration acknowledges that by annexing the Quarry area shown in Figure 4: • • • the City might have to pay the full cost of improving Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South from the existing Renton corporate limits north to State Route 900/Empire Way, and that the cost of this improvement may exceed $4 million; and the City may not be able to provide optimum fire response times to the Quarry area without the construction of a Valley fire station; and the City may have to provide fire protection service on a contractual basis to the area between Interstate 5 and Oakesdale Avenue/68th Avenue South; and the City is the preferred utility service provider in the vicinity of the Spider Staging Sales Office,10cated to the west of the recommended annexation area. It is possible that Spider Staging will request annexation and/or emergency connection to City sewer service. ,.~&,::,., .' . " ~ i'l .\ :j-' " !~ . , ~N?t CO()Nll FIPE-P~"f.lJ~T"'1 ~~e-1 fJEi,CIt IEH FlEACIl Lake I I ifF as THE BLACK RI\-..,;R QUARRY An Argument for Annexation April 18, 1988 ATTACHMENT A Renton and Tukwila have expressed serious concerns regarding the following impacts of siting the incinerator at the Quarry: Air Quality The Quarry site lies in a valley with surrounding hills of approximately 250 to 350 foot in elevation above the valley floor. An incinerator smoke stack height of 150 to 200 feet, coupled with a south wind in the winter months, would concentrate stack gases on the single-family residential community located less than a quarter mile north of the Quarry site. Likewise, north winds in the summer months would concentrate the gases on Longacres Racetrack. Transportation The E/RR facility will generate a significant amount of heavy truck traffic, and will necessitate specific mitigation measures including road widening, intersection improvements and signalization, as well as regular road maintenance and periodic reconstruction. Land Use, Visibility and Community Character A traditional heavy industrial use such as the incinerator is not compatible with the adjacent residential uses to the north and west, and the Black River Corporate Park to the southeast. Completion of this business park will add an extremely visible, high quality business complex to Renton and could set the stage for additional quality corporate development in the Valley and the eastern edge of the City. In addition, Renton has made a financial commitment to extending and upgrading Oakesdale Avenue SW to State Route 900 with the expectation that this corridor will create an identifiable "gateway" to Renton. Equity Renton, Tukwila and the other suburban cities acknowledge the solid waste dilemma which faces the County, and that "noxious facilities," such as the incinerator, have to be located somewhere. Given the location of the Metro Renton Sewage Treatment Plant, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila believe that they have done their part to accommodate noxious facilities. ' ct:dsk3b:fdl-8 .~. RENTON/TUKWILA BORDER ISSUE -Agenda- December 18. 1985 A. Discuss Renton Draft Resolution B. Consider Date for Public Meeting of Involved Property Owners and Devise Framework For C. Review Figures Involved in Exchange I OF ~ ffi ~... <0' 0-9. f<-~ "Ir"ED SEP"\"~"'~ • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 206 235·2569 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 17, 1985 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM larry Springer Richard Houghton West C/l Adjustments CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 G 1985 POLICY n""~I.OPMF.~!T n~PT. As long as proper utility and service agreements are reached I do not have a problem. We must be very careful not to create something which could be a greater problem. Especially near the railroad tracks. Police and Fire must have a clear cut line to go by. In the area of the Nielson Dairy Barn it should be made clear that Renton can serve the area with utilities; however, the actual work and cost to do so is the responsibility of the owner not the City. I still lean toward keeping the area south of Cello Bag. See sketch attached .. RCH:pmp \0-\ )( Q v'~k ~~o~- CJJ""''''t-e-. \ ~ ~ Renton-Tukwila 6 oundary Ad' M Justment ap of Affected A reas City Limi ts '.1 •.• · I i • V Existing City lir.its • I · I • I ~:;... .••. _.,_._ii OF z 0 c> 2! ~ Co' ;0 o~ ~'<' "Ir~o 'SEP1~\I<~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: December 13, 1985 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT It 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FROM: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Dear Larry: We have received from the City of Tukwila the attached report regarding the proposed boundary realignment between our two cities. You noted in your memorandum of December 10, 19B5 that Chapter 35A.16 of the RCW requires an election for reduction of city limits. The Tukwila Planning Department staff refers to RCW 35.10.217 for the procedures required to complete the election and other tasks associated with the adjustment. We would request that you review these procedures and advise our office of any amendments or additions you believe to be appropriate. Very truly yours, ~~ Steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:ss 1525G Enclosure r THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • POLICE DEPARTMENT ALAN L. WALLIS, CHIEF MEMORANDUM 'Decmeber 13. 1985 TO: Policy Development FROM: Police Department SUBJECT: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment CITY OF RENTON DEC 16 1985 The police department has no objection to the boundary adjustment suggested. It will 'actually help us in having a distinct boundary that is clear to all. Alan L. Viallis Chief of Police ALVi:mam l , .\ . OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98057 256-8678 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY December 10, 1985 DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DA VID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF RENTON UEC 1 i 1985 TO: Steve Munson, Policy Development Department POLICY DFV1'!I.Ol'MENT O!;PT. FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Draft Resolution Dear Steve: With respect to the draft resolution, please find enclosed my comments written upon the draft itself. The changes that I have suggested are minor in nature and are largely explanatory. I am not fully familiar with the legal requirements for the City to de-annex certain property. I have reviewed Chapter 35A.16 RCW involving reduction, of city limits and find that an election is required. I am sure there is some more efficient way of transferring this property between municipalities. Perhaps you can tell me if there is some other legal mechanism for this exchange of property. If we have not fully thought out the mechanism, perhaps some research should be done now and perhaps we should also involve the Boundary Review Board. LJW:nd Encl. cc: Mayor " I ISISG CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERT AIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFORE " . ?' ; RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. \"".5 SECTION 11: The City of Renton hereby establishes Intent to realign and simplify Its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. SECTION lll: The City of Renton intends to annex certain areas currently located In the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit" A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) , upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR 181) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the de-anf1exation of the above properties from the City of Renton. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton Intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. ~fI_ .~ 5~ey~ ~ I. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry. the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire District Ill) should be determined. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local share of project costs should be divided equally between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street to the state highway system. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the Intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 8. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ day of January, 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ___ day of January, 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney TO: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter, Boulevard Tukwila Washingt()n 98188 433-1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Edgar Bauch, Chairman,_T ~fr~ity Council FROM: Gary Van Dusen, Mayor _ --/' -. OATE: December 9, 19B5 . SUB.JECT: Status of the Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment . This is a report to keep the Counci 1 appraised of the current status of studies on the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment. To date, the City of Tukwila has: a) Concluded discussions which have established the current positions of the various departments within the cities of Renton and Tukwila; b) Completed an analysis of the 'statutory procedural requirements for the boundary adjustment which has been approved by the City Attorney (Attachment A); c) Received City Council direction to investigate further the possibility of the boundary adjustment; and d) Completed an analysis of costs and benefits for the City of Tukwila (Attachment 6). The Renton City Council has given direction to its Mayor to further investigate the potential for a boundary adjustment. The Renton Policy Development Department has drafted a resolution to initiate the required land exchange (Attachment C) and its staff is currently conducting its own impact studies. . cc: Council Members ( RE NT. TUK8) OB) TO: FROM: DATE: ATTACHMENT A City la 6200 Southcenter, Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Brad Co 11 i ns Vernon Umetsu October 3, 1985 SUB.JECT: Annexation procedures for the Renton/Tukwila boundary alignment Attached are detailed annexation procedures required to be followed by the cities of Renton and Tukwila in order to adjust the eastern boundary pur- suant to RCw 35.10.217. In general, there five steps in the annexation procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: 1. Council adoption of separate resolutions (a) requesting annexation of certain areas by another city, and (b) indicating a willingness to annex certain areas from another city. 2. Receive Boundary Review Board approval. 3. Hold an election for those persons residing within the proposed annexa- tion area to decide if they approve of the annexation. Majority appro- val is mandatory. 4. If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to proper- ties, not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). 5. An annexing ordinance must be enacted. (REI~T .TUK) (4C.2) ANNEXATION PROCEDURES Procedures for an adjustment of corporate boundaries between Renton and Tukwila which involves the annexation and disincorporation of certain lands. Step Une Tukwila passes a resolution calling for the City of ~enton to annex the subject areas. In a separate resolution the City of Tukwila adopts a reso- lution indicating a willingness to annex other areas to be given up by the City of Renton. A mirror of this process shall be completed by the City of Renton City Council for those areas to be ceded from Renton to the City of Tukwila, and accepted by the City of Renton from Tukwila. SEPA must be completed prior to passage of the resolutions. Each resolution should contain: a description of the annexation areas, any changes in private property indebtedness, a call for the County Auditor to hold an election(s) as applicable (see Steps Three and Four) and set elec- tion dates as applicable (ibid.). The resolution must be sent to all affected legislative bodies pursuant to RCW 35.10.220. Step Two Petitions for Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval pursuant to RCW 36.93 must be submitted by each city. BRB approval is required and should be secured prior to proceeding to Step Three. This step wou10 involve completing a BRB ~otice of Intention (To Annex) and responding to requests for additional information at a public hearing. Step Three .-------~--- An election must be held for all qualified electors in the area to· be ceded by the appropriate City. The annexation question shall only be sub- mitted to the electors residing in the territory proposed for transfer; a vote by the entire electorate of either city is not required to decide the annexation issue. If there are no qualified electors in the areas being ceded, then the City Councils shall decide on whether to approve the transfer by a majority vote. (RCW 35.10.217). The election shall be administered by the County Auditor who shall act upon the request of a legislative body pursuant to RCW 35.10.220 and .240. A majority vote by these electors approving the proposed transfer is required. A certified copy of the results of each election shall be sent to each legislative body. Election notice shall be given pursuant to RCW 20.29.080. This notice shall consist of at least one legal notice published in at least one publi- cation of general circulation within the county not more than 10 nor less than 3 days prior to the election by the County Auditor. Notice shall include any questions on assumption of indebtedness to be decided. (RCW 35. 10 . 230) . Renton/Tukwi 1 a Bounda'ry Adjustment Annexation Procedures October 8, 1985 Page 2 Step Four If indebtedness is to be assumed by the-annexing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to properties, not admi- nistrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). -, In the event that a city assumes the indebtedness of another city, an elec- tion shall be held for the entire electorate of the city assuming the indebtedness. A proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside the constitutional and/or statutory limits of the other corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if at least 3/5 of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not origi- nate votes in favor thereof, and the number of persons voting on such pro- position constitutes not less than 40% of the total number of votes cast in such corporations in which indebtedness did not originate at the last pre- ceding general election: provided, however, that if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the City legislative body, a proposition for the assumption of such indebtedness by the other cor- poration in which such indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. (RCW 35.10.240). :itep Five An ordinance annexing the subject areas must be enacted-. -A-public-hearing------- must be held prior to enacting the ordinance. The public hearing may be held at any time before or after passage of the annexation resolution in Step One. (RENT. TUKl) (4C.2) . I NT RuDU Cll UN ATTACHMENT B RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT STUDY Tukwila Planning Department Brad Collins, Planning Director Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner November 25, 1985 It has been long recognized by the administrations of Renton and Tukwila that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency services to those areas of each city cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of-way. With the approval of both city councils, the administrations of each city have been cooperatively exploring the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15, 1985, and again on October 28, 1985, various department directors from both cities met and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the implementation of this proposed boun- dary adjustment. These elements have significant fiscal costs and benefits for the City of Tukwila which are discussed below. FISCAL CuSTS AND BENEFITS The Tukwila-Kenton boundary adjustment will carry some implicit costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are summarized in the table below and then discussed in further detail. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 2 TABLE A Fiscal Costs and Benefits of the Tukwila-Renton Boundary Adjustment Addit ional Cost S.W. 43rd Street Improvement ($3 million @ t of the 20% local share) Frank Zepp Bridge lmprovement Strander-S.W. 27th St. Connector ($7 million @ i of tne 20% local share) Water and Sewer Service Fire and Police Service Proportion of Green River dike improvement costs to be transfered from Renton to Tukwila. TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST Proportion of the P-l Wetland Acquisition Transferred from Tukwila to Renton Additional Annual Tax Revenue $ 300,000 Not Available $ 700,000 Minor transfer costs o Not Available $ 1,000,000 $ 300,000 r Therefore, it will require approximately six years of the additional revenue to equal the additional, known, costs to be incurred «$l,OOO,UOO -$300,OOO)/$126,OUO). This does not include the additional pro- portion of dike improvement costs which Vlould be shifted to Tukwila from Renton which is not now known. Table A summarizes eight subject areas which have a potential for being significantly affected: land area, revenue base, roads, utilities, fire service, police service, breen River Management Plan and implementation, and development of the P-l drainage channel. The positive and negative effects of the proposed boundary adjustment are discussed in greater detail below. Land Area ---- Tukwila would be acqulr1ng 101.65 acres of land, exclusive of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Highway, and giving up 98.73 acres of private land, wholly owned by the Burlington-Northern Railroad. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 3 Approximately 60 percent of the area to be acquired is railroad right-of- way or lands located between railroad rights-of-way. The remaining areas are largely office/commercial/industrial areas along W. Valley Highway. There are a few small, vacant parcels in the office/commercial/industrial areas and infilling through additions may be possible. Revenue Base Tukwila would be acquiring approximately $14;378,100 and giving up $2,694,800. The net gain for the City is $11,683,300, which would yield tax revenues of approximately $126,129.75 annually at the 1985 tax rate of $10;79S73 per $1,000 valuation of land and improvements. Roads .-- The proposed boundary adjustment wn 1 require Tukwi la to become .responsible for the following actions: 1. Southwest 43rd Street rmprovemehts.: -. .. Acquire 1,130 feet of S.W. 43rd Street between West Valley Highway and the eastern edge of the Burlington-Northern Railroad right-of-way. S.W. 43rd Street has recently been improved by the City of Renton using a local improvement district (L.r.D.) •. It is envisioned that Tukwila would assume ownership of this roadway, two railroad signals and other improvements at no cost. Renton would remain responsible for the L.I.D. and its administration. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would strongly recommend that Tukwila make a policy commitment to the eventual improvement of the S.W. 43rd Street railroad crossing which would become the respon- sibility of Tukwila. RPW has already developed engineering plans for a $3 million undercrossing. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs is reasonable. 2. The traffic signal at SR 181 and 180th St. would probably be assigned as the responsibility of Kent by the Department of Transportation. This would be a cost of $2,000 to $3,000 annually for maintenance to that city. 'No cost sharing is anticipated. 3. Frank Zepp Bridge: Acquire one-half of the Frank Zepp bridge, giving Tukwila full ownership of the bridge. The Frank Zepp Bridge wa~ built circa 1970 and will soon have to be improved to provide more capacity for the additional traffic due to the South 188th Connector. With full acquisition of the bridge, Tukwila Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 4 would be required to provide the full local portion of improvement costs instead of sharing it with the City of Renton. Full ownership of the bridge would ease the administration of improve- ments since Tukwila would no longer be subject to Renton's road/bridge improvement priorities. 4. Acquire responsibility for any right-of-way acquisition and improvement involv,ed in the eastward extension of Strander Boulevard to SW 27th St. ' The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would very strongly recommend that Tukwila make a commitment in city policy to continue the acquisi- tion of right-of-way for the eventual connection of Strander and S.W. ' 27th and take no actions which would preclude the development of this connection. A current development proposal for the parcel immediately to the east of the Strander-SR 18tUntersection includes dedication of the required road right-of-way to the Puget Power parcel. This would still leave Tukwila responsible for ~ompleting the road connection across the Puget Power right-of-way and two railroad tracks. StrandeI' Boulevard is currently improved to the Tukwila City limits, where it intersects with We'st Valley Highway. The City of Renton has been responsible for acquiri'ng and improving right-ot-way from this point, across private lands·~nd over the railroad rights-of-way to con- nect with their existing road system~ The City of Renton has been taking actions to develop the subject roadway as they could. These actions have included extending their roadway system to the west as far as possible and denying development proposals for the property described above on the basis that it did not provide for the Strander extension as specified in their Transportation Plan. Both staffs agree that the Strander/S.W. 27th St. connection is impor- tant and should be pursued. This connection would involve an overpass above the railroad tracks which, with the boundary adjustment, would be located within the City of Tukwila and cost an estimated $7 million dollars. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs bet- ween the two cities is reasonable. 5. Grady Way Bridge: This br,idge wi 11 continue to be built with no change in the way local costs are divided between Renton and T~kwila. The majority of future maintainance is anticipated to be Tukwila's responsibility since its jurisdiction would be expanded to include most of the bridge. , , Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 5 Utilities 1. There are no Tukwila water or sewer services provided on the land area to be given to Renton. 2. The RPW has recently completed improving sewer'and water facilitie's in the North Valley Business Park and will remain the provider of these serVlces. Renton would retain ownership of the sewer and water facili- ties. Fees charged to these areas shall be the same as those charged to other areas within th1! City of Renton. Renton will have to amend its ordinance which sets water rates for areas outside the city limits at Ii times the basic city fee in order not to penalize those areas which, through no fault of their own, would be transferred to Tukwila. 3. The area at Strander, east of West Valley Highway wi 11 be acquired by Tukwila. Tukwila already serves this area with water. 4. The dairy farm area, north of 1-405 is currently served with water by a Tukwila six inch line from the south and a Renton 12 inch line from the east. There is no sewer service to this area at present, although Renton has a collector just to the east. Fire Service Tukwila already provides fire protection to the areas to be acquired under an "automatic response" mutual aid agreement. Medical aid is still pro- vided by Renton. ACquisition of the subject areas by Tukwila would not require any addi- tional personnel or equipment, according to the Fire Marshal. Police Service Tukwila does not respond to assistance calls except upon request by the Renton Police Department, nor does it patrol the subject areas at this time. Acquisition of the subject areas would not require additional per- sonnel or equipment, according to the Police Chief. Green River Management Plan and Implementation RPW wi 11. ,recommend that Renton continue to carry its share of the study costs. However, construction costs for improvements should reflect that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that these areas had been assumed by Tukwila and that Renton will benefit from the flood control project. Development ot the p-! Drainage Channel Renton/Tukwila BounOary Adjustment November 25. !985 Page 6 Tukwila is currently contractually committed to assist with acqUlrlng that ·proportion of a wetland which lies within the Tukwila City Limits and is needed to develop the P-1 drainage channel. This commitment is for approximately ten percent of the cost of a 100 acre acquisition of Burlington North~rn Railroad land to the east of the railroad tracks. A rough appraisal·of the acquisition cost is $300 million; making Tukwila's· potential share at $300.000. All of the subject wetland area would fall within Renton's jurisdiction with the boundary adjustment. The RPW will recommend that Renton assume Tukwila's share·of the qcquisition costs since it would be owned by Renton. (REI~T. TUK5.6. 7) . (1I1B) ~ Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas ....-Prc,oo,prl City L imi ts .... ~~ ............ .a isting City Li~its ISISG ATTACHMENT C CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERT AIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the CIty of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFORE RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes Intent to realign and simpllfy its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. SECTION 1lI: The City of Renton intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit" A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the CIty of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR 181) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Renton. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that 'must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton Intends to pursue the resolution of these Issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. \ I. Cocal costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. l . 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry. the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire District III) should be determined. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to Improve traffic safety and capacity. the local share of project costs should be divided equally . between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street(South 180th Street to the state highway system. • RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located In the area to be de-annelCed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. ~The ______ ~ity of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. It is understood that .the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181) should be assumed by the City of Kent. ---------------- 7. An Inter local agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of elCisting utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the . annelCation/de-annelCation area should be terminated after annexation. · . RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 8. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ day of January, 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk \ APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ......;....1, _ day of January, 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney r ._- OFAE MEMO , CITY OF TUKWILA TO: ~M, FROM: ~ ?t. DATE: 12/9 1"/3" SUB.JECT: CITY OF RENTON ute 11 1985 POLICY n""~1.0PM~NT n~PT. . -. OF R/i' ~ 1--,>, t PFie 'i -..aL -i -E 'l'.., roo o~ ~~ ~"l:D SEP1\:.~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 4. 1985 Vernon Umetsu Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 9BI88 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 RE: DRAFT RESOLUTION FOR PROPOSED RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Dear Vernon: Enclosed please find a draft of the proposed resolution containing, the issues our staffs have discussed. Please review this and forward your comments to our office as soon as possible. If you have any questions. please contact our office. Very truly yours, Jt;:z~ Steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:ss 1516G • \ . l5l5G CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERT AIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AND REGlUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERT AIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the . . City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFORE '. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. SECTION lll: The City of Renton intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if . fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR IBI) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and \-405.) upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Renton. .. ' '" RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. I. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry. the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire Oistrict III) should be determined. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local share of project costs should be divided equally between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South IBOth Street to the state highway system. .' . RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. .. ' I. ( .... RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 8. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ day of January. 1986. Maxine E. Motor. City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this __ day of January. 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch. Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney '~.' . . INTRUDUCT IUN ATTACHMENT B RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDAR V ADJUSTMENT STUDY Tukwila Planning Department Brad Collins, Planning Director Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner November 25, 19B5 It has been long recognized by the administrations of Renton and Tukwila that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency services to those areas of each city cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of-way. With the approval of both city councils, the administrations of each city have been cooperatively exploring the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15, 19B5, and again on October 28, 1985, various department directors from both cities met and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the implementation of this proposed boun- dary adjustment. These elements have significant fiscal costs and benefits for the City of Tukwila which are discussed below. FISCAL CuSTS AND BENEFITS Tne Tukwila-Kenton boundary adjustment will carry some implicit costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are summarized in the table below and then discussed in further detail. .~ Renton/Tukwi 1 a Boul,uary Adjus tment November 25, 1985 Page 2 TABLE A Fiscal Costs and Benefits of the Tukwila-Renton Boundary Adjustment S.W. 43rd Street Improvement (S3 million @ , of the 20% local share) Frank Zepp Bridge Jmprovement Strander-S.W. 27th St. Connector (S7 million @ • of the 20~ local share) Water and Sewer Service Fire and Police Service Proportion of Green River dike improvement costs to be transfered from Renton to Tukwila. TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST Proportion of the P-1 Wetland Acquisition Transferred from Tukwila to Renton Additional Annual Tax Revenue Additional Cost S 300,000 Not Available S 700,000 Minor transfer costs o Not Available $ 1,000,000 $ 300,000 Therefore, it will require approximately six years of the additional revenue to equal the additional, known, costs to be incurred «$l,D00,UOO -S300,OOO)/S126,OOO). This does not include the additional pro- portion of dike improvement costs which ~Iould be shifted to Tukwila from Renton which is not now known. Table A summarizes eight subject areas which have a potential for being significantly affected: land area, revenue base, roads, utilities, fire service, police service, breen River Management Plan and implementation, and development of the P-1 drainage channel. The positive and negative effects of the proposed boundary adjustment are discussed in greater detail below. Land Area Tukwila would be acquiring 101.65 acres of land, exclusive of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Highway, and giving up 98.73 acres of private land, wholly owned by the Burlington-Northern Railroad. I I , , i! I'! J Renton/Tukwila Bo~ ,ary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 3 ) Approximately 60 percent of the area to be acquired is railroad right-of- way or lands located between railroad rights-of-way. The remaining areas are largely office/commercial/industrial areas along W. Valley Highway. There are a few small, vacant parcels in the office/commercial/industrial areas and infilling through additions may be possible. Kevenue Base Tukwila would be acqulrlng approximately $14;378,100 and g1vlng up $2,694,800. The net gain for the City is $11,683,300, which would yield tax revenues of approximately $126,129.75 annually at the 1985 tax rate of $10.79~73 per $1,000 valuation of land and improvements • . Roads The proposed boundary adjustment will require Tukwila to become responsible for the following actions: 1. Southwest 43rd Street Improvements: Acquire 1,130 feet of S.W. 43rd Street between West Valley Highway and the eastern edge of the Burlington-Northern Railroad right-of-way. S.W. 43rd Street has recently been improved by the City of Renton using a local improvement district (L.I.D.l. It is envisioned that Tukwila would assume ownership of this roadway, two railroad signals and other improvements at no cost. Renton would remain responsible for the L.I.D. and its administration. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would strongly recommend that Tukwila make a policy commitment to the eventual improvement of the S.W. 43rd Street railroad crossing which would become the respon- sibility of Tukwila. RPW has already developed engineering plans for a $3 million undercrossing. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs is reasonable. 2. The traffic signal at SR 181 and 180th St. would probably be assigned as the responsibility of Kent by the Department of Transportation. This would be a cost of $2,000 to $3,000 annually for maintenance to that city. ~o cost sharing is anticipated. 3. Frank Zepp Bridge: Acquire one-half of the Frank Zepp bridge, giving Tukwila full ownership of the bridge. The Frank Zepp Bridge was. built circa 1970 and will soon have to be improved to provide more capacity for the additional traffic due to the South 188th Connector. With full acquisition of the bridge, Tukwila Renton/Tukwila Boul,uary Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 4 would be required to provide the full local portion of improvement costs instead of sharing it with the City of Renton. Full ownership ot the bridge would ease the administration of improve- ments since Tukwila would no longer be subject to Renton's road/bridge improvement priorities. 4. Acquire responsibility for any right-of-way acquisition and improvement involved in the eastward extension of Strander Boulevard to SW 27th St. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would very strongly recommend that Tukwila make a commitment in city policy to continue the acquisi- tion of right-of-way for the eventual connection of Strander and S.W. 27th and take no actions which would preclude the development of this connection. A current development proposal for the parcel immediately to the east of the Strander-SR 181, intersection includes dedication of the required road right-of-way to the Puget Power parcel. This would still leave Tukwila responsible for completing the road connection across the Puget Power right-of-way and two railroad tracks. Strander Boulevard is currently improved to the Tukwila City limits, where it intersects with West Valley Highway. The City of Renton has been responsible for acquiring and improving right-ot-way from this point, across private lands and over the railroad rights-of-way to con- nect with their existing road system. The City of Renton has been taking actions to develop the subject roadway as they could. These actions have included extending their roadway system to the west as far as possible and denying development proposals for the property described above on the basis that it did not provide for the Strander extension as specified in their Transportation Plan. Both staffs agree that the Strander/S.W. 27th St. connection is impor- tant and should be pursued. This connection would involve an overpass above the railroad tracks which, with the boundary adjustment, would be located within the City of Tukwila and cost an estimated $7 million dollars. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs bet- ween the two cities is reasonable. 5. Grady Way Bridge: This bridge will continue to be built with no change in the way local costs are divided between Renton and Tukwila. The majority of future maintainance is anticipated to be Tukwila's responsibility since its jurisdiction would be expanded to include most of the bridge. .~ Renton/Tukwila BoundQ,y Adjustment November 25, 1985 Page 5 Uti 1 it i es 1. There are no Tukwila water or sewer services provided on the land area to be given to Renton. 2. The RPW has recently completed improving sewer and water facilities in the North Valley Business Park and will remain the provider of these services. Renton would retain ownership of the sewer and water facili- ties. Fees charged to these areas shall be the same as those charged to other areas within th'E! City of Renton. Renton will have to amend its ordinance which sets water rates for areas outside the city limits at It times the basic city fee in order not to penalize those areas which, through no fault of their own, would be transferred to Tukwila. 3. The area at Stiander, east of West Valley Highway will be acquired by Tukwila. Tukwila already serves this area with water. 4. The dairy farm area, north of 1-405 is currently served with water by a Tukwila six inch line from the south and a Renton 12 inch line from the east. There is no sewer service to this area at present, although Renton has a collector just to the east. Fire Service Tukwila already provides fire protection to the areas to be acquired under an "automatic response" mutual aid agreement. Medical aid is still pro- vided by Renton. Acquisition of the subject areas by Tukwila would not require any addi- tional personnel or equipment, according to the Fire Marshal. Pol ice Service Tukwila does not respond to assistance calls except upon request by the Renton Police Department, nor does it patrol the subject areas at this time. Acquisition of the subject areas would not require additional per- sonnel or equipment, according to the Police Chief. Green River Management Plan and Implementation RPW will .. recommend that Renton cont i nue to carry its share of the study costs. However, construction costs for impro.vements should reflect that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that these areas had been assumed by Tukwila and that Renton will benefit from the flood control project. Development of the P-l Drainage Channel ;A'ton/Tul~~i 1 B 'd· 'C' a ouno, j A Justment 25, !985 Tukwila is currently contractually committed to assist with acqulrlng that proportion of a wetland which lies within the Tukwila City Limits and is needed to develop the PAl drainage channel. This commitment is for approximately ten percent of the cost of a 100 acre acquisition of Burlington North~rn Railroad land to the east of the railroad tracks. A rough appraisal of the acquisition cost is $300 million; making Tukwila's potential share at $300,000. All of the subject wetland area would fall within Renton's jurisdiction with the boundary adjustment. The RPW will recommend that Renton assume Tukwila's share of the qcquisition costs since it would be owned by Renton. (REIH.TUK5,6,7) . (#iB) -. ! if,J, IIIz7115'1 •• ~~ f/, r~ fr'" Aet t7< s~ 10 I1tCQ"'JO~/...L. -(11~ IIA: Io-rir ~ ~~ d,'b,! ,4' ~~Ctr'i1$ -Tv Ie tV/ie.. ~ tfr w~ fugA" -I I/~.i Ie fA' ,Jv r/{ r,./h.#' ~'I ~ C1 (-tf.!lJJ,.. 10 ____________________________ ___ Date _________________ Time ____ _ WHILE YOU WERE OUT 01 ______________________________ , Ph one TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH I RETURNED YOUR CALL I I Message Operator .~ WAC 197-11-970 CITY OF RENTON I~OV 8 1985 . v- j( CONDITIONED DETERMIN~TION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE POLICY DEVELOPMENT ns:PT . Description of Proposal Develop a total of 26,000 gross square feet in four buildings on a 76,~41 square foot (1.77 ac.) parcel. Approximately 5,200 sq. ft. of building area will be in retail use while 20,800 Sq. ft. would be developed as warehousing. Proponent First Western Development of Washington. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any N.W. 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23N, Range 4E; on the east side of W. Valley Hwy. Buildings addressed as 16600, 16550, 16490, and 16460 W. Valley HWy. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-85-288 CN 85-184 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. D IXI There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by November 19. 1985 • The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This DNS is issued subject to the conditions listed in Attachment A. Respons i b le Offi ci al-=B:.:.r.:::a.:::.d...!C~o~l.!.ll!.!· n:.::s~ __________________ _ Position/Title. ___ ....;P:...l:,;:a:.:,:n""n.:.,;in"'g"'.-=D..:..ir:..,:e""c::.;t:.::o.:...r ____________ .Phone 433-1845 Address _______ ....;6~2~0-=0....;S::.:o~u~t""hc~e~n~t-=e.:...r....;B::.:o~u~1_=ev::.:a~r-=d~,_T:..,:u~k~w..:..i.:.,;la~,~W~A~9:.::8~1-=88~ ______ _ Date:..-.---,'...:...( ---.::.G._-..:.g~5" _____ S i gnature. __ ~!..«...___=::;.!....;~:...::._-'--·='---____ _ You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS ATTACHMENT A Conditions to the Determination of Non-Significance for "Tukwila II" 1. Left turning movements from the northern access point shall be prohibited using "Right Turn Only" signs at the exit and installing 18 inch striping with turtle backs along West Valley Highway. Striping and turtle backs may be substituted with other turning control measures with approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT), the Tukwila Police Department, and the Tukwila Public Works Department. 2. Road Paving to DOT standards shall be installed to the property line with curb and gutters installed along the property line, outside of the right- of-way. Curb and gutters shall be to a standard approved by the Tukwila Public Works Department. . 3. A storm water detention and disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the TuKwila Public Works Department by November 20, 1985. At a minimum, the above system shall be characterized by the following: a) All run-off to pass through on-site oil-water separaters to be main- tained by the landowner. b) Detention system to accommodate the 10-year storm event. (TUKII.DNS) (1B) (11/85) ( c Control No. Ep' '11e No. ----.,...:--~ Fee Sl00.00 Receipt No. 9tf;:7 1--c I i __ '~~VI NMENTAL CHECKLIST I .\ ... \ A. BACKGROUND ,_., ," .. ~ :')!i=:.r '--_ . •... , __ ----J 1. Nllfte of proposed project, if IPplicable:_..JNI:iI./'''A ...... ____________ _ 2. Name of IPpllcant: Firat Western Development or Washington 3. Address and phone nunmer of applicant and contact person: _________ _ Scott Shanks. 1f230-198th Street S.W. Lynnwood. WA 98036 4. Date checklist prepared:_~ .... ~~_s_t -=-2.'--'9_8-'-5 _________________ _ 5. Agency requ es tin g Check 1 is t : _____ -"C""i ~t y'--"o""f_T:..:;u"'k.;;.w.,:..t1:..:;a=--________ _ 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): Project will be constructed in a single phase beginning the Bummer 0' 19l1le!l'1!jr:-.------ 7. Do you have any plans for future add it ions. expans ion. or further act tv tty related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ________ _ No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will 9. be prepared, directly related to this proposa1. ______________ _ Npne that we are awere of. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? of other If yes, explain._-r~~~~~~~~~~------------------------------None that we are aware of. -2· ( ( ( 10. 11. 12. List Iny !lovernment Ipprov a 1 S Building Permit or permits t~at will be needed for your proposal. I OCcul1enc~ Permit Shopet!"8 "i.ster u.. Pef!-m:iOt -_ . .;, -:-: ~ -.-. ? ...-1--_ (. ,: // ~-' i '.-'/'"'/-'-/. Sive brief, co""lete description of your proposal, including t~e proposed ~ses and t~e size of t~e project and site. T~ere are several questions liter in i~is c~ecklist t~at 15k you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You dolnot need to repeat t~ose answers on this page. Section E requires a co""lete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be sunrnarfzed here. I . See at tachment Location of the proposal. Sive sufficient Information fol" a person to unders~and the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address,l if any, and section, towns~ip, and range, if known. If I Pl'oposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the slte(s). Provide a l~,gal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are ~ot required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted ~ith any permit apPlil\ca. tions related to this c~ecklist. Project site is located on the east side or West Valley Road and South or the Strander Boulevard intersection. Site area is 76.9'41 sguare reet. See boundary and topographic I survey included with this checklist ror legal description. . I I 13. Does the proposal lie \Iithin an area deSignated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? . I No -3- ( I ( B. ENVIRONM£NTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General descrfptfon of the sfte (cfrcle one): rolling, hflly, steep slopes, mountainous, ~ ~ b. ~hat is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent s 10pe)1 5" Ilgge on north end. . i c. What general types of soi 15 are found on the sHe (for example, clay, sand, grayel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ____ _ See Attached. d. Are there surface indications or history of. unstable sol1s in the illlnediate vicinity? If so, describe. Except for the artificial .fill placed on the site. the native soils are typical to those found on other sites neer the Green River. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fi 11. Building looting trenches will be over- excavated and baCkfilled WitH structural fill to De iffi- ported from e quarry. 3' to q' of hll 101,11 be placed UHdEr tHe ndrtHerly mOSt bulldlhg_ Otfier gFBdhi9 will be limited to footing excavations. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so aenerallv descrihe. Yes. an epproved temporary erOlsiol'o contra ""system wnr be deSigNed gild hiscalled. This will b'!S COliSC. deLeid witr. drainage swales runninR into a si Itetion erea. The outfall will be run through a filter fabric prior to leeving the site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with imperviOUS surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 85% of the site w .... iTTII ... b:-:e,...c=co=:v~e::r~e."d-:w-:"!':t"'h-- impervious surface. -.. Evaluat ian for Agency Use On ly ( ( h. 2. Air Proposed llleasul to reduce or contro 1 eros lon, 01" other impacts to the earth, if any: Onjgn and jnstall an on-sita temporar-y-e~r~o~sl~·o~n~c~o~n~t~ro~lr-- .Vltam " d,.eribed in (n a. W~at types of emisstons to the air would result from the proposal (t.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Evaluat Ion for. Agency Use Only C02 emissions from hea",! equipment will be created during construction activity. Depending upon the time of year the 'project is constructed. dust from radin operations ma be present. b. his will be minimized and should not be significant. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.-:-:-________________ _ No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: If grading occurs during dry weather. a dust abatament program w,iI be lO,foated. C02 emis- sions 'rom hea",! \!qu,pment wouid be a temporary Impaet and should not Se Significant as the site grading will be liMtted. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the im~ediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saHwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state >lhat stream or river it f.lows into. I. .f Yes. the Green River lays aCi css .. est velley Highway to the West. -~- ( ( ( 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes •. Dlease des~r:ibe,. and attach available Dlans. Te~. tne [3reen IIItIr leI. ecrOSi'tn. Wilt villey HigHwly iHd Ii wltlilil 200 reet or project lite. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge .aterial that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and ind icate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. _________ _ None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water wi thdrawals or divers ions? Give general descr ipt ion, purpose, and approx imate quan- tities, if known. ____________ _ No. 5) Does the floodplain? proposal lie within a IOO-year If so, note location on the site plan· __ ftM _______ ....,..... _____ _ NQ. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and antiCipated volume of discharge. ___________ _ No. -E- Evaluat Ion for Agency Use On 1 y <. ( ( b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground· water? Give general description, purDos, ... and h~Droximate auap; tities, if known. J). portIon or t e norm waUr rono will be .llIowed to drain onto the edjacent property as the underground storm water system located in the West Valley Highway is too high to access. This storm water will be cc,l- lected in catch basins and dilcharged through an oi Ilwater separator. 2) Oescribe waste ~aterials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals .•• ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected .to serve. ____ _ No waste matertals will be dIscharged. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so describe.T he topography on the northerly site will not allow accass to the UnOergrOUnd stormwsEer uti iity Ideated In Wist valley Mlgl'way_ Tills pOrtion Of the glte will drain td the I!!!ast UtiLO tlie adjacElit Puget Sound Power end Light Co. easement area. The southerly portion will ba collected and dralnedTrito the - storm water pipe located in West Valley Road. ------------------------------------- ·7· Evaluat 10n for Agency Use Only' ( ( '. ( 2) Could waS\ ... ahrills enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally descrlbe. ____ _ No. d. Proposed ~asures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water Impacts, If any: ____ _ ihBed" an site Std, Iii waLdl cellael,a" ey.' •• ---------------------------------- 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the 5 ite: deciduous tree: ___ evergreen tree: shrubs ~ grass pasture ::: crop or grain alder, maple, aspen, other fir, cedar, pine, other wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,' ---skunk cabbage, other ___ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ___ other types of vegetation Evaluat Ion for Agency Use On ly b. What kind and amount of vegetation wi 11 be removed . or altered? The on site IIIIgetation consists of· scrub grasses and and low laying ground cOllllr. c. L 1st threatened or endangered species knolm to be on or near the site . ______ . __________ _ None. -c- ( ( ( d. Proposed landsdfltng, use of native plants, or _ .ner .elSures to preserve or enhance vegetlt Ion on the site, If any: New lardlceping will be installed .'ong West Valley Road and In tne parking and Sfioe iriSS as Illustr.ted on tne lite pian. CindicepiHO will eUils,s, 61 tre.s. lad end snrubi. Ali landsEaped Ifill BRill have ali automatic Irrlgiilon iy§tiffl. 5. Anl.a1s I. Circle any observed on or nelr the birds Ind anlmlls which have been or near the site or Ire known to be on site: birds: hawk, heron, elgle~Ongblrds~other: Robins mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Field Mice fish: blSS, Silmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or end angered spec I.es known to be on or near the site. ____________ _ None. c. Is the s; te part of II mi grat ion rou te? If so, explaln. __________ ~---------------_--------- No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildl ife, if any: Introduction af new landscaped areas will provide a habitat for urban tolerant species of wildlife. ---- ',41uHl0n tor Age:1cy Use Only ( ( ( 6. Energy and .atural tltources a.' What kinds of energy (electrtc, natural gas, on, wood stove, solor) will be used to ~et the cOllPleted prOject's energy needs? Describe Whether it will be used for heatino manufacturina. I!tc. Building will be fiiiated and cooleo'by electriC fired'ftlaf pomp.iHd ,urhical. l!as fit ad fOi ced ali rOi ii.cas 11,8, be used in warehouse ere as. b. Would yOur project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. __________________________________ __ No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included ln the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy illpacts, 1f any: Bu i Id ings wi" be ':::Ia=es::"li':g=ne=d:rr:, n~ac:::c:::o::r::ra::::an:::c::e:-w~, t"'n't.,;n::e"'lwD"8111§nonm.n'"gwt~O'n State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental heal th huards, including exposure to toxlc chemicals, rlsk of flre and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a rllSu 1 ~ of th.i 5 groDos II 17 If .50 describe. SherWin/Williams Fl'alnt C mpany wdl loca e In dne of the proposed bUlidliig. Tlils.facility will be FOI wkulesf!lh: and retail sales of paint and paint products. Some mixINg Of paint will occur as IS tYPlca' In paint stores. 1) Describe special emergency .services. that .. !T1iaht be requ ired. Standard police. : medic and f Ire pro- tection. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental .hea.lth hazar:ds_ if any·. . . Malntsln clean ar'fCl effll:'lent opl!,.dllllA IA j:l9IFU SCIaFa-. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. ( Noise 1) What types of nohe exist In the area which lIay affect your project (for example: traffic, .qulplllent, operation, other)? __ --,: _____ , Np ,.,iving ngiM wi II ."ect the project or proposf!d 11"'2 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- tena or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from construction equipment and construction-relat@d activities will 6e shOft term. r Rere ir! no risidEntlai uses Within the Immediate VICinity tniC will 6@ affected. There "",til be no proJect-relitld 16nB tertii holSE LIiBC Is significant. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, If any:~lqmb~lftle~.------------------- ( e. L and and Shore 11 ne Use a. current use of the Site and adjacent b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. __________ ~~---------~------------No. c. Describe any structur:es on the site .. ~,...--____ _ No structures on Btle. ( -1 i - Evaluation for' Agency Use On ly ( ( ( d. W111 any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Light industry (M-1l f. What is the current comorehe~s tve p Ian des 1 gnat ion of the site? Commerciar g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?_U ...... rb ... a""'n _____ _ h. Has any part of the site been classified as an -environmentally sensitive-area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 20 to 30 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project d tsp lIce?_-n=:--___________ _ None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: ______________ _ NJA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patjble with exist17!1 and projected land u~es and p.l ans. if any: Ibw only those uses allowed In the M-l Zone. ---------------------.~------------- -12 - Evalurt Ion for Agency Use Only 9. Housing ( a. Approximately how .any units would be provided, if ( ( anyl Indicate whether hi gh, midd 1 e, or low-income hous 1ngl--::":":""-:-______________ _ None. b. Approximately how many units, if Iny, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, lIiddle, or low-income hous lng. _______________ _ None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing Impacts, if any: _____________ _ N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is 'the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not Including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? I S'-20' H,gh b. What views in the immediate viCinity would be altered or obstructed? ____________ _ views obstructed due to b"ilding constr"ction are not cgo§jdered 5jgnjfiCRI'll--______ _ c. Propos ed measures to reduce or contro 1 aes theti c impacts, if any: Design building with compatible CXUISL- and scale to adjacent and nearby buildinos. Evaluat ion for Agency Use Only' ( ( ( 11. Light Ind Gllre I. What type of light or gllre will the proposal 'a~V~:1ot a'1,'Wuif~' 1~II~t!'nV wm'b~djnl~onW's occur? DlW 'PUTCH. These levels at the ground ieveis shell be ipp?"llxi- mptely .75 foot candles. All fixtures iocated elong property line shell be cut-orr type 'Ixture to r.mlt IIgRt 16n1108. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be I safety hazard or interfere with views? _____ _ No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposa17 __ No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or contro I Ii ght and glare impacts, if any: __________ '--_ 'UB cutoff type fixturesBiOng property lines. Limit light level to epproximetely .75 foot cendles et ground surface. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the inml'diate vicfnity? _____ _ Jogging trail along the Green River. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ______ _ No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or appl icant, if any: __ _ None. ------------------------- , . -, .. - Evaluation for Agency Use On ly ( ( ( 13. Historic Ind Cultur PreserVltlon I. Are there Iny places or objects listed on, or pro·, posed for, .. tlonll, state, or 10cil preservatfon registers known to be on or next to the 5 fte? If so, generilly descrfbe.--,.,..... _________ _ No. b. 6enerally descrfbe any landmarks or evfdence of hfstorfc, archaeologfcal, sctentfffc, or cultural fmportance known to be on or next to the s fte. __ _ None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control fmpacts, if any: -------------------N~/A~------------------- 14. Transportatfon a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans ff any. ') Site is eccessed from Stata Road 1 B I aka West valley ~bBd, The propose site eve opmen p a In [2] access pOints one f uil movement the btHer Iliftl ted co right-in and right aut. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?~nr------------------------------------No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? HO'N many wou ld the oroJect III iminatl!?~ __ _ Approximately 630n site pbrKi'I'lg ataTls are Dl!rn§- provldeCl. ''<10 pal kllig stalls would be ellrtilii&Ced. , , tvalu4tlon fOl Agency Use On l.r ( ( ( d. Will the pro!> •• al require any new roads or streets, or improvements to ex is t ing roads or streets. not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether publ1c or private). _____ _ No. e. .,111 the project use (or occur in the iamedfate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportati9n7 If so, generally describe. ___________ _ No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak vDlumes would .oc.cur:. Approximately 300 trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts. if an1,: Limit curb cuts to two (<!J ........ L,..,m..,l,.,..t~t,."Olrri ... m"'O"'v.,."mem--~· . onto SR I B I to one (IJ curb cut. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If SO, gen er a 11 y d esc rib e .:--.,.....~=-.",.,.. __ ,..--..,.,.-.....,. __ increase in need tor standard polica. :fire and medic units. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Construct buildings to current fire code~!I1J·"'Fd1!lSr.. --- Maintain clean and effICIent operation. ~----------------- Evaluation for Agency Use On ly ( ( ( 16. Utilities b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or In the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. Natural Gas -WASHINGTON NA TURAL GAS Telephgne -PACIF'C NORTHwEST BE' I Eilectrjcity-pIlGEr SOIINO POWER ANn liGHT Wltle G Sewer Oily QF TUKWILA plJBllC WORKS c. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency Is relying on then to '?-~ Its ~e",s~n. Signature: ~ Date Submi tted: -.;, I - Evaluation for Agency Use On ly .' . CD~ INC, C ~~ I~ "-"C " ( ;1 Vi, I i ~ : 0( I J-. ~")-", 'f' "-LJr-..... ~' ~SSuC I,L.. TES 4230 198th ST S W Attachmant to City or Tukwila Enviranmantal Impact Statement Checklist Tukwila Twa August 2. I 985 BACKGROUND 11. Total project consists of four [4J single-story buildings. The two mast northarly buildings as illustrated on the site development plan fall within the' 200' shoreline limit and therefore are subject to the Shoreline Master User Permit process. The southerly two buildings are outside the 200' line and are not subject to the Shoreline Master Use Permit process. The site area is approximately 76.941 sq. ft. total. Building area is approximately 26.700 sq. ft. Approximately 63 on-site parking stalls are provided. Proposed uses include bulk retail such as paint sales. hardware. etc .. and office. werehouse. I. Earth c. A substantial quantity of presumably uncontrolled artificial fill covers all but the northernmost 50 feet [approximateJ of the property. The site surface has baen elevated by fi lIing to about the lavel of the West Vallay Highway. with the fill depth ranging between 4 to B feet. The filling has created a steep bankline along portions of tha eastern property margin. The native underlying soils are products of flood plain and normal channel deposition within the Green River Valley. which consists of grey-brown to grey. very fine sandy silts. silty fine to very fine sands. and occasional clayey si Its. ~ ,. -. , , .. • . • • • ! , , LANDSCAPE SCHEOI.l.E SYMI ~ DESCRIPTION SIZE CIl coo.oea ,,'~~ r· ------,,,,'fA. 1:; h(?*7;(??z,6zf=i~1 c-~ .-~Wf'-''''''''''' .--.. -..... . ~ . .. ---.. -,~ ,.:-J.---~. .'~.~ .... ,,'c.o-b_~ = :.:. .. ~~ " ........... II:. ... ~ ---.-~ , ....... .,., .'~ ~~rIeo ~~"'I::I -- NOTE,. , ::' .':::::"" ... :::: • .::-::.:: .... ~." ...... __ .... 11 _._ ..... _ I .• " , __ ._ ... 11 ........ _01. , ... "' ..... _ . '-r, __ :~..,., " ,-----. .,..I.u,...e.I~ "---------..,~T ~ " ""---==-=::-'~~ '---------..... I. " ............ ". __ ......... ___ .... _.11 .. . ... 11 ....... _ ." ... _ ...... o. ...... _. ,_,,_. t, III • __ ,,_ ... n _,_ .. __ . I . .,00 •• _ ._," ..... ",_ II ...................... _"., fRONTAGEAREA A fBQtIIAGE AREA B l!::~;;r.~1:I~~d:mm:~. :::-:.~'f.:~ ::..,:.-=~:M.::'. ._------ WEST -------------------------------------------------_._--.• ------- PUGET , , ." \ .~. - VALLEy ROAD .. .. .. SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. Ro.W ! _ ..... ===-'=~=r~-:;=----==-'----,-::-... . ... -.. ~~.:.~~~ ~-:"":;''''.---~ -.. --~ ~=--'--- -0-'. -~ .:::"..::::= ~~. _. ~l -,",-" ~ __ . '""_ ~~~ ./ 1".;:." . !. I. , I ~ .. , . -._. // \' I. . '~.-...~-.. --.--- / I ",-.-J .. _." "'. • ..... .. ~ --- --)~~~:~:~~---~~~ ,," ,. --I' .. "'-",' .' -I~"" ~ I" .7 ·-4; ~ Il.--.. -.--;--";.' , .. g.o ~:~_~:~_. ___ ;_ ~'.~ ... ; -._-....... ; •. ~ ~~~'.~'I· ... . -' '~~:::;'-' {:;::..' _ ",."' __ , _. - v ---"'-... ~-~, ~ {'-; /.;; -, ~ ::..:; :~f'2>T:Y£~~":--:;.-~'a--,·_~t~·~·.;;.o'.=:;:'"'j= --I.' ." S.R IIlII -----------.-------. .---------... -. ... -S"=-=:':~ ~~o·PLAN $ Ammendments to the parking layout have been submitted and reviewed in this checklist. Buildings have been slightly reduced in size. -' \ 1~~l~~GWm@ \ \:j_~~-=2. iCj~~ t CITY OF TUKWiLA L PLANNIi~G DEPT. ,,, .... i 1 : : .::':" / ,.. .. RUTHE RIDDER KING COUNTY ASSESSOR t: Mr. Steve Munson Policy Development Dept. Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Munson: October 31, 1985 S. T. Schreiner, Manager Accountino Division CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 1985 POLICY DEVF.LOPMENT OF.PT. The data below is offered in response to your telephone request of October 30, 1985 Sec 24 Twp 23 R4 tax lots 63 and 64, and Sec 36 Twp 23 R4 tax lots 2, 3, 71, 11, 57 and 62 are all in tax code' area 2110. Sec 25 Twp 23 R4 tax lots 46, 55, 52, 19, 4, 41 and 42 are in code area 2340, while tax lots 2, 3 and 62 are in this section, township and range, are tax code 2110. Following are breakdowns of the 1985 levy rates for the two code areas involved. Taxing Districts State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Ser. City of Renton City of Tukwila School Dist. No. 403 Hospital Dist. No. 1 Total Rates Code 2110 $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 2.24799 .27673 $11.24534 Code 2340 $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 $10.79573 If you have questions regarding the above, please call the undersigned at 344-3967. DVW: ss Very Truly Yours, RUTHE RIDDER King County Assessor ~ D. V. Wirth, Assmts. Tech. Services Officer 709/! King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle ,Washington 98104-2384 206-344-3968 ) PAGE 3 1911/18/85 Exec. 7 9/9/85 Exec. 9 6/10/85 Exec. 20 12/9/85 Exec. 11 3/4/85 Exec. 13 4/15/85 Exec. 4 6/3/85 Pol. Dev. 152 12116/85 COMMunity Fest.val Task force has been forMed & is organizing festival to take place 8/86. Task Force will report to COMMunity Servo when appropriate. Rec. DROP. Truck Pol.cy Report provided to COMMittee by Assist. City Attny. No further action required. Rec. DROP. M.I. Boat Noise Request for inforMation frOM M.I. not received. Rec. DROP. K.C. News Bureau COMMittee has forMal request & application for funds. AdMin .• 5 prepared to Meet at Council convenience. Rec.HOLO. Ranier Crest Legal The issue has been resolved with Description Error Housing Preserv. Request Long TerM Phased Oevlpt. & P.U.O. the issuance of a quit claiM deed. No further action required. Rec. DROP. AdMin. acknowledged request current policies seeM adequate. No action needed Ree. DROP. A MoratoriUM has been adopted to allow tiMe to revise a new P.U.D. ord. Staff will ask for COMMittee referral when appropriate. Rec. DROP. 2 1/28/85 Pol. Dev. Concurrent Annex. 2 & 15 have been resolved with adoption of Council policy.#21 was a request for annex./re2orle that was subsequently processed separately. Rec. DROP. 15 1/28/85 & reoone policy. 21 7/22185 14 12/16/85 Pol. Oev. Annex. Polley This issue i5 recognized as an adMin. priority & has been included in the '86 work plan. Council May wish to delete frOM C.O.W. & refer a standing COM~. when approprIate. Rec. OROP~ ,26 _9/,9/fl5~_-1'~1 ~1.Le_,::: ._~iJ e_ ~1,ev~ ~'~~-tie;"5-~r:~~cu-r;~;,tl /b;;Tn[i~L 03 10128/85 Ren-Tui.. Boundav p,,"oces5ed & wilT b-e c,pre5cnt'ed for i 34 1114/85 -" 86 f'lan. CoMi'i15S. 0"n,."w-soon, 'R~flDiJ2 " .. :7 J Work PrograM --.,-,-,,--.~ .' Renton City Co~ncil 10/28/85 Page three Consent Agenda continued Bartell Drugs Utility Bill Collect ion Fee Appeal of First Cit'y Developments Corporation FPUD-042-85 (Victoria Hills PUD -Pha se I I) Renton/Kent Rental Rehab Program , -.. -0 i \:!roposed Rento)1-' T,ukwila Boundary (Adju'stment r Final Approval - West Hill Reservoir CAG 067-84 Final Approval - 1985 CBD Sewer Trunk CAG 048-85 Ra i 1 road Crossing Signs CORRESPONDENCE Valla Appeal (City of Renton Jones Park) SA-061-85 OLD BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Curb Painting Complaint - No i se from Jocko's Tavern Finance Department submitted request from Bartell Drugs for increase ,in utility bill collection fees from 30c to 35c per item. Refer to Budget Committee. ADDeal filed by First City Developments Corporation on Hearing Examiner recommendation for final planned unit development, File No. FPUD-042-85, for Phase II of Victoria Hills PUD consisting of 196 multifamily units on 16.48 acres of property located south of S. Puget Drive, west of Benson Road S. and north of S. 26th Street. Refer to P I ann i ng and Deve I opment Committee. Parks/Housing and Community Development Department requested additional $45,000 appropriation of Block Grant funds for Renton/Kent Rental Rehab Program (HCD/c84682) and an additional $130,000 of Rental Rehab Entitlement monies allocated to the program. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Pol icy Development Department requested Council authorization to initiate negotiations with the City of Tukwila regarding proposed boundary line adjustment to straighten borders of both cities; adjustment will readily identify boundaries for citizens and will significantly improve del ivery of publ ic services and facilities. Council concur and refer to Planning and Development Committee for progress reports and regular monitoring. Publ ic Works/Utilities Engineering Department submitted CAG 067-84, West Hill Reservoir; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $54,037.21, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $26,633.61 to contractor, Reliable Steel Fabricators, if all required releases have been received. Counc i 1 concur. Public Works/Engineering Department submitted CAG 048-85, 1985 CBD Sewer Trunk; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate of $104,147.29, commencement of 30-day I ien period, and release of retained amount of $21,146.57 to contractor, Tri-State Construction Company, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested adoption of RCW provIsions identifying and I imiting installation of signs adjacent to railroad crossings. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Letters were read from H. Hayden, 532 Cedar Avenue South, regarding the Valla appeal of Hearing Examiner's approval of playground equipment at Jones Park. Letters cited recent news articles regarding new City Park In Bellevue and Town 'Square Park in Enumclaw, and urged retention of passive nature of Jones Park, particularly in view of children's play equipment available at Liberty Park within one block. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Publ ic Safety Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending that the Board of Publ ic Works establ ish guidel ines regarding painting of house numbers on curbs. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Clymer asked that a complaint he received last weekend regarding noise emanating from Jocko's Tavern be referred to the Administration for review and report back. The complainant, who lives in an adjacent apartment complex on NE 4th Street, west of Union Avenue NE, has contacted the Police Department, but they report that the noise does not exceed the limit specified in the City's noise ordinance. Renton City Council 10/28/85 Page four , Old Business continued Planning and Development Commi ttee Arlene Roberts Rezone Appeal R-032-85 Truck Traffic in NE 4th/NE 3rd Street Corridor (Cemetery Road) ValleyComm Center Dedication Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report regarding the Arlene Roberts appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation to rezone property located al: 209 SW 13th Street from R-l to L-l to use an existing building as a day care center. The appeal was based on the Examiner's condition that an existin£ non-conforming garage be removed from the .site. I The Committee found that issuance of a variance from Section 4-716 of the City Code may be appropriate in this case since the appellant suffers undue hardship caused by construction of the 1-405 freeway after the garage was construc··:ed. The location of the freeway created the non-conformity in the setback for the garage. Because the appl icant will be inconvenienced by any requirement to make a variance appl ication, the Committee recommends the Council waive all fees incident to the appl ication. The Committee recommended that the City Council approve the reclassification of the subject site from R··l to L-l subject to the conditions set forth in the Hearing Examiner's report, dated July 26, 1985, and his letter, dated August 15, 1985, and further impose the condition that the appl icant be issued a variance from the provisions of Section 4"716 of City Code for the existing garage on the property. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the City Council request that the annual fill and grade 1 icenses for all operations 'Jtilizing the NE 4th/ NE 3rd (Cemetery Road) access corridor be reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee to determine the maximum truck trips allowed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke indicated that the City of Renton had better representation at the ValleyComm dedication ceremony last week than any other Valley city. Besides himself, Mayor ShinpocH, Councilman Trimm and Councilwoman Mathews were in attendance. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Commi ttee Ordinance #3952 May Creek Associates Rezone R-051-85 Amendment to Conditional Use Language Board of Appeals of Uniform Fire Code Animal Ordinance Added to Industrial Ordinances Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinance for second & final reading: An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located at 4904 Lake Washington Boulevard from Residence District (R-2) to Business District (B-1) for May Creek Associates, File No. R-051-85. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer pr"sented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-748 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code as it relates to conditional use permits to allow a less ,-estricted use in a more restrictive district if the use will be no more objectionable than the uses permitted in such district. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending a portion of Chapter 9, Title II (Fire Regulations) relating to Boal-d of Appeals under the Uniform Fire Code. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending a portion of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code permitting hobby kennels and kennels in Manufacturing Park Zone, Office Park Zone, Light Industry Zone and Heavy Industry Zone_ MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDI~ANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. \ .~ . • For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I. # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ===================================-===============-========================================= SUBMITTING Dept. /Di v. /Bd. /Comm. Policv Development Staff Contact' __ ~i~~lun~s~o~n~.~s~'t~e~v~e~ ____ ~ __ ~ (Name) SUBJECT: Proposed Renton-TUkwila Boundary Adjustment Exhibits: (Legal Oeser., Maps, Etc.)Attach A. Letter B. Memorandum C. _________ --="--_ COUNC I L ACT I ON RECOMMENDED : ____ --'-"'--_ See below. FISCAL IMPACT: -0-(At this time) Expenditure Required $ Amount Budgeted $ Fo r Agenda Of __ (.;":-:::l:T0-=-/=-28~/:;-,e:..;:5,::-<-___ _ (Meet i ng Date) Agenda Status: Consent Public Hearing ______________ _ Correspondence ______________ _ Ordi nance/Reso I ut i on _____ _ Old Business ________________ _ New Business, ________________ _ Study Session ._------ Other ___________ _ Approva I: Legal Dept. Yes Finance Dept. Yes Other Clearance No No. N/A N/A --------- Appropriation- Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) At the staff level, Renton and TUkwila have been discuesing the potential for straightening the boundary H~ne 'bet~een 'the' two cities:' The proposal being "" .... ~, ... " .. -" ... ~-~ .... -..... ~. ., considered is to use the eas1; ..• E!q.gE!. 0; t;l}1!. ;ailro."~ . right:o~-~ay . as the new common city limits. This bo~~4~.~~~ adj~s~ent wil~ ~ot.only make the city limits more readily identifi~lE!fQ;.th~.P.ublic bu~.will.also si~ificantly improve the delivery of public services and facilities. particularly public safety and emergency se~ice;:'··At·thistime. the'Administration is asking -...... .... ... -.. Council to 1) authorize the initiation of serious negotiations with TUkwila concerning the boundary line =~~j':'~~~nt ';';4: 2 i that: the It.'8tter be referred to the Planning and Developm~t C9~ittE!E! fo; pro.grE)ss reports and regular monitoring. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENSTO BE CONTACTED: THIS COPY TO BE SUBMITTED ON TUESDAY AT DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING. , • • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washilgton 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor October 18, 1985 Barbara Shinpoch, Mayor City of Renton Renton City Hall 200 Mill Street South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Letter of Understanding regarding the proposed Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Dear Mayor Shinpoch: This is to confirm our understanding that on or about October 28, 1985, the administrations of the cities of Renton and Tukwila will be presenting a propo- sal for realigning their common city limits to their respective city councils. The presentations will generally consist of the following: A proposed new common boundary along the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; The effects of the new boundary on assessed valuation and land area in each city; and . The disposition of roads, and water and sewer lines in the transferred areas. Please send me a letter with any suggested changes or your concurrance by October 23, 1985. I concur subject to the changes indicated above. Barbara Shinpoch Mayor, City of Renton /ks (SHINPOCH) (IB) \ . • TO: ~ROM: OATil: . City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard 1tkNiIa VYashilgton 98188 433-1800 Gary L VanDusen. Mayor MEMORANDUM Renton Boundary Adjustment File Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner October 15, 1985 BU&lIlCT: Renton~Tukwila Staff Meeting of 10/10/85 Information Items: 1. Attending the meeting were the following persons from Tukwila and Renton: Tukwi I a Phil Fraser, Public Works Ross Earnst, Public Works Hubert Crawley, Fire Cnief Don Pierce, ,Police Chief Brad Collins, Planning Director Vernon Umetsu, Planning Renton Steve Munson, Planning larry Springer, Planning Director Dick Houghton, Public Works Director lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Claude Evans, Police 2. Both Renton and Tukwila staffs were unanimous in their support of the ~oundary adjustment and having all railroad right-of-way in one city or the other. , ' 3. Although putting the railroad rights-of-way in either'C'ity is 'accep- table, from a service standpoint, the preferred boundary line would be the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way due to shorter police and fire response times. • • . . Renton Boundary Adju,unent File October is, 1985 Page 2 4. Sewer sery i ce in the North Vall ey Bus i ness Park is envi s i oned to be proyi ded by Renton under an i nterl oca 1 agreement. Water sery i ce in this business park area may be provided by Tukwila. Detailed utility agreements would be negotiated prior to a formal annexation proposal being presented to each City Council. S. The City boundary adjustment is ant i ci pated to be presented to each Council in late October. (RENT.TUK) (I1B) • p. ([NTCN -(U/C c.,...)fc .. 4 ~ I P c..O~e-/ CI '( (' r;!OUN"DA-vf:-'y ~ UJe.s.+ g'k? L I .. ~ ~e ~ . "'" G;eJ. -'~ ?OW~ -. __ .------' ._-----~ ----------_. -------'-_ .. _-.' ----.-- 92,j ~, .,~ . ~\30 ~' . . . .. IJ'iV __ . ------. .. [)J !b:6 ~ 8c!e,{ -ri~S -_ .. _ .. _._.-... -- OF R~ ~4. ~,>. .... 0 C,) Z Z ~ ~ >l! 'll... ... 0-9. f<.~ "'''EO SEP11:.~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 4. 1985 10 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM TO: Alan L. Wallis. Police Chief FROM: Steve Munson. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Border Issue On October 10. 1985. at 8:30 a.m. staff from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila will convene In the Planning Department conference room of the Tukwila City Hall to discuss proposed alteration of the common boundary line between the two cities. To be included are Planning staff from Tukwila. Policy Development personnel from Renton. and Public Works. Fire. and Police representatives of both commununities. A previous session on September 27. 1985. with postal representatives from Renton and Seattle identified the following tasks to be completed before any firm recommendations can be issued: I) Examination of existing land uses along the north frontage of S.W. 43rd Street (5. 180th Street) and an existing dairy farm on Monster Road to determine whether or not the status of these uses can be legally altered to avoid the requirement for an annexation election. 2) Establishment of a timetable of all events involved in the process to see what legal and procedural requirements must be met to complete the proposal. These tasks and perhaps additional ones (depending upon potential issues raised by the Public Works and Ufe Safety representatives) wlll be developed in greater detail and responsibility for completion determined following this session. This will enable staff of both cities to negotiate and develop a firm recommendation to be presented to the City Councils of both communities for evaluation and decision. SM: 14 34G:wr OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 1, ~ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 ~ .,. ~~ r,,'?- '1l'ea SEP"E.\I'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM October 4. 19B5 TO: A. Lee Wheeler. Fire Chief FROM: Steve Munson. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Border Issue On October 10. 1985. at B:30 a.m .. staff from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila will convene In the Planning Department conference room of the Tukwila City Hall to discuss proposed alteration of the common boundary line between the two cities. To be included are Planning staff from Tukwila. Policy Development personnel from Renton. and Public Works. Fire. and Police representatives of both commununities. A previous session on September 27. 19B5. with postal representatives from Renton and Seattle identified the following tasks to be completed before any firm recommendations can be issued: I) Examination of existing land uses along the north frontage of S.W. 43rd Street (5. 180th Street) and an existing dairy farm on Monster Road to determine whether or not the status of these uses can be legally altered to avoid the requirement for an annexation election. 2) Establishment of a timetable of all events involved in the process to see what legal and procedural requirements must be met to complete the proposal. These tasks and perhaps additional ones (depending upon potential issues raised by the Public Works and Life Safety representatives) will be developed in greater detail and responsibility for completion determined following this session. This will enable staff of both cities to negotiate and develop a firm recommendation to be presented to the City Councils of both communities for evaluation and decision. SM:1434G:wr OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 f, ~ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 q, '0' '" ~ 0-9. /?><,; "'l"~o SEP""l~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM October 4. 1985 TO: FROM: Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director Steve Munson. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Border Issue On October 10. 1985. at 8:30 a.m. staff from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila will convene in the Planning Department conferen'ce room of the Tukwila City Hall to discuss proposed alteration of the common boundary line between the two cities. To be included are Planning staff from Tukwila. Policy Development personnel from Renton. and Public Works. Fire. and Police representatives of both commununities. A previous session on September 27. 1985. with postal representatives from Renton and Seattle identified the following tasks to be completed before any firm recommendations can be issued: I) Examination of existing land uses along the north frontage of S.W. 43rd Street (S. 180th Street) and an existing dairy farm on Monster Road to determine whether or not the status of these uses can be legally altered to avoid the requirement for an annexation election. 2) Establishment of a timetable of all events involved in the process to see what legal and procedural requirements must be met to complete the proposal. These tasks and perhaps additional ones (depending upon potential issues raised by the Public Works and Life Safety representatives) will be developed in greater detail and responsibility for completion determined following this session. This will enable staff of both cities to negotiate and develop a firm recommendation to be presented to the City Councils of both communities for evaluation and decision. SM: l434G:wr OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z '6 E '1'.., "" °02 ~~ "'''EO SEP~\:.~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM October 3. 1985 TO: Larry M. Springer Policy Development Director FROM: Steve Munson. Assistant Planner 6n1 SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Border Issue On October 10. 1985. at 8:30 a.m. staff from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila will convene in the Planning Department conference room of the Tukwila City Hall to discuss proposed alteration of the common boundary line between the two cities. To be included are Planning staff from Tukwila. Policy Development personnel from Renton. and Public Works. Fire. and Police representatives of both commununities. A previous session on September 27. 1985. with postal representatives from Renton and Seattle identified the following tasks to be completed before any firm recommendations can be issued: 1) Examination of existing land uses along the north frontage of S.W. 43rd Street (S. 180th Street) and an existing dairy farm on Monster Road to determine whether or not the status of these uses can be legally altered to avoid the requirement for an annexation election. 2) Establishment of a timetable of all events involved in the process to see what legal and procedural requirements must be met to complete the proposal. These tasks and perhaps additional ones (depending upon potential issues raised by the Public Works and Life Safety representatives) will be developed in greater detail and responsibility for completion determined following this session. This will enable staff of both cities to negotiate and develop a firm recommendation to be presented to the City Councils of both communities for evaluation and decision. SM:1434G:wr , ., TO: "ROM: OATI!: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter 80uIevard Tukwila WasITgton 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Brad Co 11 ins Vernon Umetsu October 3, 1985 9U ..... I!CT: Annexation procedures for the Renton/Tukwila boundary alignment Attached are detailed annexation procedures required to be followed by the cities of Renton and Tukwila in order to adjust the eastern boundary pur- suant to RCW 35:10.217. In general, there six steps in the annexation procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: 1. Council adoption of separate resolutions (a) requesting annexation of certain areas by another city, and (b) indicating a willingness to annex certain areas from another city. 2. Receive Boundary Review Board approval. 3. Hold an election for those persons residing within the proposed annexa- tion area to decide if they approve of the annexation. Majority appro- val is mandatory. 4. Ii indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose· districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to proper- ties, not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). 5. An annexing ordinance must be enacted. 6. An ordinance disincorporating certain areas must be enacted. Annexing and disincorporating ordinances can be enacted immediately after appro- val in the election and would become effective immediately upon passage. (RENT. TUK) (4C. 2) • ANNEXATION PROCEDURES Procedures for an adjustment of corporate boundaries between Renton and Tukwila which involves the annexation and disincorporation of certain 1 ands. Step One Tukwi la passes a resolution call ing for the City of Renton to annex the subject areas. In a separate resolution the City of Tukwila adopts a reso- lution indicating-a willingness to annex other areas to be given up by the City of Renton. A mirror of this process shall be completed by the City of Renton City Council for those areas to be ceded from Renton to the City of Tukwi 1 a, and accepted by the City of Renton from Tukwil a. SEPA mus t be completed prior to passage of the resolutions. - Each resolution should contain: a description of the annexation areas, any changes in private property indebtedness, a call for the County Auditor to hold an election(s) as applicable (see Steps Three and Four) and set elec- tion dates as applicable (ibid.). The resolution must be sent to all affected legislative bodies pursuant to RCW 35.10.220. Step Two Petitions for Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval pursuant to RCW 36.93 must be submitted by each city. BRB approval is required and should be secured prior to proceeding to Step Three. This step would involve completing a BRB Notice of Intention (To Annex) and responding to requests for additional information at a public hearing. Step Three An election must be held for all qualified electors in the area to be ceded by the appropriate City. The annexation question shall only be sub- mitted to the electors residing in the territory proposed for transfer; a vote by the entire electorate of either city is not required to decide ,the annexation issue. If there are no qualified electors in the areas being ceded, then the City Counci 1 s shall decide on whether to approve the transfer by a majority vote. (RCW 35.10.217). The election shall be administered by the County Auditor who shall act upon the request of a legislative body pursuant to RCW 35.10.220 and .240. A majority vote by these electors approving the proposed transfer is required. A certified copy of the results of each election shall be sent to each legislative body. Election notice shall be given pursuant to RCW 20.29.080. This notice shall consist of at least one legal notice published in at least one publi- cation of general circulation within the county not more than 10 nor less than 3 days prior to the election by the County Auditor. Notice shall include any questions on assumption of indebtedness to be decided. (RCW 35.10.230). Renton/Tukwila Bounda.y Adjustment Annexation Procedures October 8, 1985 Page 2 Step Four If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annex i ng city, then a city-wi de election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not. anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to properties, not admi- nistrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). In the event that a city assumes the indebtedness of another city, an elec- tion shall be held for the entire electorate of the city assuming the indebtedness. A proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside the const i tut i onal and/or statutory 1 imits of the other corporat i on in wh i ch the indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if at least 3/5 of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not origi- nate votes in favor thereof, and the number of persons voting on such pro- position constitutes not less than 40% of the total number of votes cast in such corporations in which indebtedness did not originate at the last pre- ceding general election: provided, however, that if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the City legislative body, a propos it i on for the assumpti on of such indebtedness by the other cor- porat ion in whi ch such indebtedness did not ori gi nate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporat i on in wh i ch such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. (RCW 35.10.240). Step Five An ordinance annexing the subject areas must be enacted. A public hearing must be held pri or to enacting the ord i nance. The pub 1 i c heari ng may be he ld at any time before or after passage of the annexat i on reso 1 uti on in Step One~ Step Six An ordinance 'disincorporating the subject areas must be enacted. See Step Five for public hearing procedures. c (RENT. TUK1) (4C.2) Consolidation And Annexation 35.10.140 35.10.117 Other methods for annexatioD of cities and to"ns. Three other methods are available for the annex- ation of all or a part of a city or town to another city or town: (1) A petition for an election to vote upon the annex- ation of all or a part of a city Or town to another city or town signed by qualified electors of the city or town proposed to be annexed equal in number to at least one- fifth of the votes cast at the last municipal general elec- tion held therein may be filed with the legislative body of the city or town to be annexed. Such legislative body. in turn. shall. by resolution. advise the legislative body of the city or town to which annexation is proposed of the receipt of such petition and request the laller legislative body to indicate by resolution whether it will accept the proposed annexation. and if so. on what terms. If such resolution of the annexing city states that its legislatiY y is favorably disposed toward such annexation. the legislative body of the city or town to be annexed shall submit to the electors in 2.\lcIL!e.lTitory proposed taJ>e annexed. the question of whether sucn-territory shall be annexed and such other propositions as are deemed a propria te. (2) The legislative body of a city or town may on its own initiative by resolution indicate its desire to be an- nexed to a city or town either in whole or in part. In case such resolution is passed. such resolution shall be trans- milled to the city or town to which it desires to be an- nexed. and the legislative body of such city or town shall by resolution indicate whether it will accept the pro- posed annexation. and if so. on what terms. (3) In the event there are no qualified electors resid- ing within a part of a city or town which said city or town wishes to have annexed to another contiguous city or town. then the issue of annexation will be decided by the legislative body of the city or town from which the territory is to be withdrawn. This decision. which shall be by majority vote of said legislative body. shall be considered as if it was an election by qualified voters of said territory and handled accordingly under the other applicable sections of this chapter. If the legiSlative body of the city or town to which annexation is proposed indicates a willingness to accept the annexation. then the question of whether such terri- tory shall be annexed to such corporation and become a part thereof and such other propositions as are deemed appropriate shall be submjlled to the electors in the ter- ritory to be anneM~bY the legiSlative body of the city or town or part thereo to be annexed at an election which such legislative body shall cause to be called for that purpose. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § 4.] 35.10.220 Designation of election date---Notice to other corporations affected. The legislative body receiv- ing such petition shall designate a day upon which such special election shall be held in each of the corporations proposed to be consolidated to determine whether such consolidation or creation of a community municipal cor- poration. or both. as the case may be. shall be effected. and shall give wrillen notice thereof to the legislative (198J Ed,I body of each of the corporations proposed to be consoli- dated, or in case the legislative bodies of contiguous municipal corporations by jOint resolution initiate a pro- posal to consolidate such corporations. the day on which such special election is to be held shall be specified in such resolution. Such notice shall designate the sug- gested name or names in alphabetical order of the pro- posed new corporation in aU cases except in the case of the proposed annexation of all or a portion of any city or town to another city or town. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § 5; 1967 c 73 § 15; 1965 c 7 § 35.10.220. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 3; RRS § 8909-3. Formerly RCW 35.10.020. part. and 35.1O.040.J Times (or holding elections: Chapter 29.13 RCW. 35.10.130 Duty to gin notice of election-Notice requirements. Upon the giving and/or receiving of such notice, it shall be the duty of the legislative body of each of the corporations proposed to be consolidated or con- solidated with provision for creation of a community municipal corporation. or in case of a proposed annex- ation of all or a portion of a city or town to another city • or town the legislative body of the city or town proposed to be annexed. to cause the election notice required by RCW 29.27.080 to be given of each special election. Such notice shall distinctly state the propositions to be submitted. the names of the corporations proposed to be consolidated. the name or names in alphabetical order of the proposed new corporation. and the class to which such proposed new corporation will belong. and the question of assumption of indebtedness by the other cor- porations in which the indebtedness did not originate, and shall invite the electors to vote upon such proposi- tion by placing a cross "X" upon their ballots after the words "For consolidation" or "Against consolidation." and. if appropriate, the words "For creation of commu- nity municipal corporation" and "Against creation of community municipal corporation" or words equivalent thereto or "For consolidation and creation of community municipal corpOration" or "Against consolidation and creation of community municipal corporation" and. in case the question of the form of government of the pro- posed new corporation is submilled. to place a cross "X" upon their ballots after the words describing the forms being submitted. for example "For commission form of government" or "For councilmanic form of government" or "For council-manager form of government": Pro- vided. however. That in the event of such anriexation no proposition in regard to the name Or form of government is to be submilled to the voters. [1969 eu. c 89 § 6; 1967 c 73 § 16; 1965 c 7 § 35.10.230. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 4; RRS § 8909-4. Formerly RCW 35.10.050. 35.10.060. and 35.11.Q20. part.] 35.10.140 Can.ass of .oles Joint con.entlon- Statemenl of .oles Conlents, filing. In all cases of consolidation or annexation. the county canvassing board or boards shall canvass the votes cast thereat. In an election on the question of consolidation the votes cast in each of such corporations shall be can· vassed separately. and a statement shall be prepared [TI.1e 35 RCW-t> 131 ,. I .. , " I. .. J j · . 35,\0.240 'Ie 35 RCW: Cilies and Towns showing Ihe whole number of votes cast. the number of votes casl for consolidation and the number of votes cast against consolidation. the number of votes cast for cre· ation of a community municipal corporation and the number of votes cast against creation of a community municipal corporation. or both, as the case may be. in each of such corporations. In case the question of the form of government of the new corporation shall have been submitted at such election. the votes thereon and on the name of the new corporation shall be canvassed. and the result of such canvass shall be included in the statement, showing the total number of votes cast in all of the corporations for each form of government submit· ted. A certified copy of such statement shall be filed with the legislative body of each of the corporations affected. If it shall appear upon such statement of canvass that a majority of the votes cast in each of such corporations were in favor of consolidation or consolidation and cre· at ion of a community municipal corporation, the legisla· tive bodies of each of such corporations shall meet in joinl c~qvention at the usual place of meeting of the legislative body of that one of the corporations having the largesl population as shown by the last determina· tion of the office of financial management on or before the second Monday next succeeding the receipt of the statement of canvass to prepare a statement of votes cast and declaring the consolidation adopted or consolidation adopted and a community municipal corporation cre· ated, and if such issue were submitted, declaring the form of government to be that form for which a majority of all the votes on that issue were cast and the name of the consolidated city to be that name for which the greatest number of votes were cast. . ,/ In an election on the question of the annexation of all ; or a part of a city or town to another city or town, the .21. ,votes cast in the city or town or portion thereof to be e ~ . annexed shall be canvassed, and if a majority of the votes cast be in favor of annexation, the results shall be included in a statement indicating the total number of ~tes cast. I Both with respect to consolidation and annexation. a proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside I the constitutional and/or statutory limits by the other , corporation(s) in which the indebtedness did not origi· nate shall be deemed approved if a majority of at least three-fifths of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof, and the number of persons voting on such proposition "_I constitutes not less than forty percent of the total num· /. I ber of votes cast in such corporations in which indebted· I ness did not originate at the last preceding general I election: Provided, however, That if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the city legislative body, a proposition for the assumption of such indebtedness by the other corporation(s) in which such indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. [Title 35 RCW-p 141 "'2 • A duly certified copy of such statement of either a consolidation or annexation election shall be filed with the legislative body of each of the corporations affected and recorded upon its minutes, and it shall be the duty of the clerk, or other officer performing the duties of clerk. of each of such legislative bodies. to transmit 10 the secretary of state and the office of financial man· agement a duly certified copy of the rccord of such statemenl. (1981 c 157 § 1: 1973 1st ex.s. c 195 § 12; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 7; 1967 c 73 § 17; 1965 c 7 § 35.10· .240. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 5; RRS § 8909-5. Formerly RCW 35.10.070.1 S.,trability-Effecti.e dltn-----CoRSlruclion--197J 1,( u.s. c: 19!: Sec notes following RCW 84.52.043. Canvassin, returns. generally: Chapler 29.62 RCW. Conducl of elections-Canvass: RCW 29.lJ.040. 35.10.245 W.rds--Eleclion of councilmen. The legislative body of the consolidated or the annexing city or town may, in its discretion. divide the city by ordi· nance. into a convenient number of wards of substan· tially equal population and fix the boundaries thereof. and change the same from time to time. Whenever such city is so divided into wards, the city council shall desig· nate by ordinance the number of councilmen to be elected from each ward, apportioning the same in pro· portion to the population of the wards. Thereafter the councilmen so designated shall be elected by the quali· fied electors resident in such ward, or by general vote of the whole city as may be designated in such ordinance. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § 8.] 35.10.250 Consolidation-Election of officers of new corporation. Immediately after the filing of the statement of a consolidation election, the mayor of the city or town having the largest popUlation. as shown by the last determination of the office of financial manage· ment, shall call a meeting of the legislative authorities of the cities and/or towns to be consolidated. Such legisla· tive authorities shall cause to be called a special election, to be held in such new corporation. for the election of the officers required by law to be elected in corporations of the class and form of government to which such new corporation belongs. which election shall be held within six months thereafter: Provided, That if the next regular general election of officers in cities of the class and form of government of such new corporation will be held within one year and not less than two months from the date of such consolidation election, then the officers of such new corporation shall be elected at the said next regular election. Such regular or special election shall be called and conducted and canvassed in all respects in the manner prescribed, or that may be hereafter prescribed, by law for municipal elections in corporations of the class of such new corporation. and the results transmit· ted by the canvassing authority to the legislative body, who shall immediately declare the result thereof and cause the same to be entered upon its journal. and file certified copies of such result with the legislative body of each of the other corporations affected, who in like manner shall cause the same to be entered upon its (1983 Ed.) \ , . Consolidalion And Annexalion 35.10.320 journal and a copy thereof shall be med with the secre· tary of state. [1981 c 157 § 2; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 9; 1965 c 7 § 35.10.250. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 6; RRS § 8909-6. Formerly RCW 35.10.080.] 35.10.260 Effective dale of consolidalion, crealion of communlly municipal corporalion--Terms of office. From and after the date of such entry such corporations shail be deemed to be consolidated into one corporation under Ihe name and style of "The City. (or town as the case may be) of __________ " (naming it). wilh the powers conferred. or that may hereafter be conferred. by law. upon municipal corporations of the class 10 which the same shail belong. and the officers elected at such election. upon qualifying as provided by law. shall be entitled 10 enter immediately upon the duties of their respective offices. and shail hold such offices respectively until the next municipal general election to be held in such city or town. and until their successors are elected and qualified. The consolidation shail become effective on the date on which the persons elected at such election have qualified and assumed office .and in any event such date shall not extend beyond the third Tuesday following such election. If the proposition also provided for the creation of a community municipal corporation. such corporation shail be deemed organized with the powers granted to such corporation by "this 1967 amendatory act. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § 11; 1967 c 73 § 18; 1965 c 7 § 35.10.260. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 7; RRS § 8909-7. Form- erly RCW 35.10.090:] -RetiJer'. note: The language "this 1967 amendatory act" first ap- peared in the amendment to this section by section 18, chapter 73, Laws of 1967. For the codification of chapter 73. Laws of 196', see note (ollowing RCW 3l.14.01O. Times (or holding elections: Chapter 29. J J RCW. 35.10.265 Annexalion--Wben effecthe---Ordi- nance. Immediately after the ming of the statement of an annexation election. the legislative body of the an- nexing city may. if it deems it wise or expedient. adopt an ordinance providing for the annexation. Upon the date fixed in the ordinance of annexation. the area an- nexed shail become a part of the annexing city or town. The clerk of the annexing city shail transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the secretary of state and the office of financial management. [1981 c 157 § 3; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 10.] 35.10.300 Disposition of property and assets. Upon the consolidation of two or more corporations. or the annexation of any city. or town to another city or town. as provided in this chapter. the title to all property and assets owned by. or held in trust for. such former corpo- ration. or city or town. shall vest in such consolidated corporation. or annexing city or town. as the case may be: Provided. That if any such former corporation. or city or town. shall be indebted. the proceeds of the sale of any such property and assets not required for the use of such consolidated corporation. or annexing city. shall be applied to the payment of such indebtedness. if any exist at the time of such sale .. [ 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 12; 1965 (1983 Ed.1 c 7 § 35.10.300. Prior: 1929 c 64 § II; RRS § 8909-11. Formerly RCW 35.10.100 and 35.1 1.080. part.] 35.10.310 Assels and liabi1ilies of componenl cil- ies--Taxslion 10 pay claims. Such consolidation. or annexation. shall in no wise affect or impair the validity of claim or chose in action existing in favor of or against. any such former corporation or city or town so consolidated or annexed. or any proceeding pending in relation thereto. but such consolidated corporation. or annexing city or town. shall collect such claims in favor of such former corporation. or cities or towns. and shall apply the proceeds to the payment of any just claims against them respectively. and shall when necessary levy and collect taxes against the taxable property within any such former corporation. or city or town. sufficient to pay all just claims against it. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § 13; 1965 c 7 § 35.10.310. Prior: 1929 c 64 § 12; RRS § 8909-12. Formerly RCW 35.10.110. 35.10.130. part. and 35.11- .080. part.] 35.10.315 Adoplion of final budgel and levy of prop- erty taxes. Upon the consolidation of two or more cor- porations. or the annexation of any city or town after March 1st and prior to the date of-adopting the final budget and levying the property tax dollar rate on the first Monday in October for the next calendar year. the legislative body of the consolidated city or the annexing city is authorized to adopt the final budget and to levy the property tax dollar rate for the consolidated cities or towns and any city or town annexed. [1973 1st ex.s. c 195 § 13; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 14.] Se,enbllity-Effecth'e dates---Construction--l973 ht ex ... C 195: See notes following RCW 84.52.043. 35.10.317 Receipl of state funds. Upon the consoli- dation of two or more corporations. or the annexation of any city or town. the consolidated or annexing city shall receive all state funds to which the component cities or towns would have been entitled to receive during the year when such consolidation or annexation became ef- fective. [1969 ex.s. c 89 § IS.] 35.10.320 Conlinuation of ordinances. All ordinances in force within any such former corporation. at the time of consolidation or annexation. not in conflict with the laws governing the consolidated corporation. or with the ordinances of the former corporation having the largest population. as shown by the last determination of the office of financial management shall remain in full force and effect until superseded or repealed by the legislative body of the consolidated corporation. or annexing city or town. and shall be enforced by such corporation or city or town. but all ordinances of such former corporations. in conflict with such laws. charters or ordinances shall be deemed repealed by. and from and after. such con- solidation or annexation. but nothing in this section shall be construed to discharge any person from any liability. civil or criminal. for any violation of any ordinance of such former corporation incurred prior to such consoli- dation or annexation. [1981 c 157 § 4; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § [Title 35 RCW-p 151 CITY OF RE.NlON. WASHINGlON RESOLUTION NO. 2617 WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Renton is considering adopting new zoning Ordinances for Manufacturing Park (M-P). Office Park (O-P). Light Industry (L-l). and Heavy Industry (H-l) Districts. and WHEREAS the City Council wishes to state the findings of fact that have been made and the process utilized in arriving at these Ordinances establishing Zoning Oistricts. now therefore the City Council of the City of Renton do resolve as follows: SECTION I: The above is found to be true and correct. SECTION II: Findings of Fact: 1. That review of these zoning revisions was undertaken as part of a comprehensive update of the City's Zoning Code (Titie IV. Chapter 7); 2. That the Pianning Commission and City Council have thoroughly considered the draft proposals. public testimony. staff reports. and other pertinent information: 3. That the City Council did refer the topic of these zoning revisions to the Council's Planning and Development Committee and such Committee met on May 23. July 25, August I and August 8. 1985. and adopted a report dated August 19, 1985. At the regular meeting of August 26. 1985. the full Council considered the comments received to date, the City staff reports dated February 8 and July 18. 1985, and the Council Committee's recommendation. The City Council concurs In the report of the Planning and Development Committee and incorporates the same herein as if it had been fully set forth; 4. That the proposed zoning revisions have been reviewed by City officials in . accordance with the Renton Environmental Ordinance (Title IV. Chapter 28) and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and have been determined to have no significant adverse environmental impacts; / RESOLUTION NO. _.:.;26",,1..:..7_ 9. That adoption of the zones, as revised, will provide functional Zoning Districts that promote commerce, industry and economic development, while mitigating the potential on-site and off-site impacts of such uses; 10. That the revised ordinances will provide one Zoning District (H-I) appropriate for heavy industrial activities that are not compatible with more sensitive land use zones; another Zoning District (L-l) for medium to small scale industrial activities with limited development standards; an M-P zone Intended for e range of Industrial, office, and commercial activities with development standards to ensure a quality environment; and a Zoning District (O-P) with high development standards Intended to create a park-like setting that allows office park uses along with high quallty Industrial and other uses; and II. That retail and service uses can be made compatible with the M-P and O-P zones by applying certain conditions that control strip commercial Impacts and ensure park-like settings. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of September, 1985. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _.<,;9t .... h'--_ day of September, 1985. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City -Attorney Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor -3 - j I . I I .. -'~orJ"-c-,ms~\ 0 ~~. f~? .. ·1 ~~ 11-':S;w:'w/-t. /~he/s;I;'!:0 .... j ~e.... U:J .. f. ~W/-tA!~.CM!~S ~ . . ..... ... ~\'" ~<L-l -/.~'~:::,,* c,,~ t: -"" . .... !St! ·k J •. -.. ~-.... ' ;i,~U,;..~~~:.\\-,~~-k-{'-~~ ..•. . "-' \ ~Ilr~{'.\.. «>.J;;" ;, les''6''ei j .~~&.Ji' -. -~ ----. -_.. -~ -~ -. ---_. -------- , y -~-- ~ .r,~" -' - , \ , • ~, ~ --' ·r· \ '-.. -, \ i , , _C' '. '0 .~. I' , - " -. , , \, ~! \ .: ;-.:-. r, :~ .' . ,.~-' , I " l I I I i I + ' " • '+- f --,,.- ~: \ ~'. -'.'-",.' .. ~ " , . '. • '/ .! ;. " '-, _. .J i. " I-.-•••• , t " \ , ' . . ). ;-~ , \ ; -' ~ I ,.,. '-' . . \'. '\ .. ! ,,' .. ' '. ~ .. J I I II! t I : \ ,'-:!" , , ) I. " ~\ : , .' .. . ' .. ,.' .-.," .. ', ,;~ :" " ~'v . ',- , ' t· .. i •• -- -~,-' . . , i"':;" 1', ....';l' --~ ." .::. t- I . '. I ' -_. ....... -----. '. ---' -. . . .._( ~.: . ..... .~.. ... . .... -----.... -.....- I , ----,.. --~.--_. -'.---... ---. -. _. ~--. -. -. ~.------... -... ----~ -. ----.. -~----. --_. - .'. .- , ' " • --" -.----I, . ----------.------------'--============= -_. -------------_._--- --_._-----------------.-.. ==.=--= ==-----===----------._--_._-_._ ...... . - TO: FROM: DATE: .~ City Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen. Mayor MEMORANDUM Steve Munson Vernon Umetsu, Planning Department August 30, 1985 CITY OF RENTON ~EP 31985 POLIC'! OEV~.LOP~."f:~H r':'FPT. SUB.JECT: Map of Tukwila City Limits. Per your request, I am transmitting to you a map of Tukwila's city limits. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any further assistance. \ OF z '6 ~ ~ co' "'0-'9. ~~ "'''''0 SEP1\:.~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 17. 1985 TO: Mayor Shinpoch FROM: ~Larry Springer THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT OEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Boundary Line between Tukwila and Renton We have scheduled a meeting with the Seattle Postmaster and the Planning Director for the City of Tukwila for 10:00 a.m. on Friday. September 27th. to discuss these issues. I will keep you posted on whatever outcome there Is. It might be advisable for us to do a personal briefing for you on the land exchange proposal prior to the 27th. LMS:wr ~----------. , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA y, SHINPOCH. MAYOR 235-2580 MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON ;;iE P 1 'I 1985 DATE: September 17, 1985 POLICY nF.V~LOPME!'IT n~PT. TO: Larry Springer FROM: Mayor Shinpoch Dear Larry: Even though I announced no sense of urgency regarding the line between Tukwila and Renton, the Seattle Postmaster is most anxious to get the zip codes rearranged. He does not care that annexations or other considerations interfere with a simple postal change. Are we close to an accommodation with Tukwila? My fear .is that if we agree to the zip code problem, which is dear to Mayor Van Dusen's heart, we may undo the adjustment by a land swap. Please advise. Ba!i~~hinpoch' Mayor BYS:hh laoo ''-.-.. 1 ... :4. ..... U OF z ("l E ~ .,. "'0-9. rc-~ "'"£0 SEP"'(~""~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 7. 1985 TO: THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM Mayor Shinpoch Larry Springer -4r; JvU Cf! ~l(. ~t PROM: SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Boundary and Zip Code Problems As per your August 1st memo. we are researching the number of properties that would be affected by a change In the zip code if we establish the railroad tracks as the boundary line between Renton and Tukwila. I would expect that we can have some response up to you In the next two weeks. if that will be soon enough. At first blush. it would seem to be a very reasonable proposal. I have also scheduled a meeting with Brad Collins. the Tukwila Planning Director. for August 26th to consider the potential for modifying the respective city limits and using the west railroad track as a more practical border. Brad concurs that the idea has considerable merit and mentions that it has been pursuShe past with enthusiasim but has encountered some significant legal problems. whic have made it impractical. We will proceed with our review of the new State law and e potential for this city limit adjustment and keep you posted as we go along. LMS:0230s:wr - • .. ". ' .... DATE: August 1, 1985 TO: Larry Springer FROM: MayorShinpoch Dear Larry: THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR MEMORANDUM 235-2580 CITY OF RENTON MuG 1 1985 POLICY OEV~LOPME'IT OFPT. Mayor Gary Van Dusen of Tukwila called to explain a problem having to do with zip codes in the area where our two cities meet. Tukwila residents and businesses are saddled with the Renton code 055 and vie~1 this as an inconvenience at best. The Post Master offered a possible remedy --using the railroad track as a dividing line with those west designated 98188 (Seattle/Tukwila) and those east assigned 98055. This would extend south to l80th and would require our concurrence. I told Gary I would need to determine specifically \~hich properties ~Iere affected because if there are Renton businesses in the proposed exchange area, we may not want to cause them to have obsolete stationery or advertising. Can you advise me if we're talking vacant or developed land? A peripheral issue: the boundary between our two cities is a ragged, jagged, peculiar line and could be straightened l'lith cooperation and a new (state) law which makes' the change easy to accomplish. Again, my concern is fiscal: would we be trading some nice productive enterprise such as Andy's Diner for a piece of swamp? So far the matter has been informally discussed between Councilmembers and between Gary and me. It's time to ask you to coordinate with your counterpart in Tukwila and provide me with a recommendation: this is advantageous for both entities to pursue or leave well enough alone. Your schedule is full, I realize, and this matter. is not a top priority but could use your attention as soon as it is convenient. ~~~. Shinpoch, /1ayor cc: Mayor Van Dusen .! 'f, , .. ,: .) ->; '; ,,;~ '~ t.1 ~ 1 :J ~ ~ ~ :~ i Cd 'i! ~ '-" n / ' DATE: August 1, 1985 TO: Larry Spri nger FROM: Mayor Shinpoch Dear Larry: THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR 235-2580 MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON I-\UG 1 1985 POLICY OEv~LOPMENT DEPT. Mayor Gary Van Dusen of Tukwila called to explain a problem having to do with zip codes in the area where our two cities meet. Tukwila residents and businesses are saddled with the Renton code 055 and view this as an inconvenience at best. 1 ~The Post Master offered a possible remedy --using the railroad track as a dividing ij-__ //-l.ine with those west designated 98188 (Seattle/Tukwila) and those east assigned ~ 98055. This would extend south to 180th and would require our concurrence. :'it ij i ~ 'J ~ ~ '~ ) '~ ~; I told Gary I would need to determine specifically which properties were affected ~ because if there are Renton businesses in the proposed exchange area, we may not ~ want to cause them to have obsolete stationery or advertising. Can you advise me if we're.talking vacant or developed land? A peripheral issue: the boundary between our two cities is a ragged, jag ed, ~9 peculiar line and could be straightened with cooperation and a new (state aw? ~ which makes the change easy to accomplish. Again, my concern is lsca: wou d we be trading some nice productive enterprise such as Andy's Diner for a piece of swamp? So far the matter has been informally discussed between Councilmembers and between Gary and me. It's time to ask you to coordinate with your counterpart in Tukwila and provide me with a recommendation: this is advantageous for both entities to pursue or leave well enough alone. Your schedule is full, I realize, and this matter is not a top priority but could use your attention as soon as it is convenient. ~~t Shfnpoch, Mayor cc: Mayor Van Dusen ... h [() 02 J-"3-t.; > VEd#-b/,sl-'SfU~~rM "==='J> ~ :ftJl-} i) j)e k"",w< .£ Yi sir; 4JW<'5 /L-,....;...-__ ..... ~0,cvre OtuYt er ShW (rnc /ok d55~5S4..-/v~,{"n < j) DATE: August 1,1985 TO: Larry Springer FROM: Mayor Shinpoch Dear Larry: THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 235-2580 MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON /-lUG 1 1985 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Mayor Gary Van Dusen of Tukwila called to explain a problem having to do with zip codes in the area where our two cities meet. Tukwila residents and businesses are saddled with the Renton code 055 and view this as an inconvenience at best. The Post Master offered a possible remedy --using the railroad track as a dividing line with those west designated 98188 (Seattle/Tukwila) and those east assigned 98055. This would extend south to l80th and would require our concurrence. I told Gary I would need to determine specifically which properties were affected because if there are Renton businesses in the proposed exchange area, we may not want to cause them to have obsolete stationery or advertising. Can you advise me if we're talking vacant or developed land? A peripheral issue: the boundary between our two cities is a ragged, jagged, peculiar line and could be straightened with cooperation and a new (state) law which makes the change easy to accomplish. Again, my concern is fiscal: would we be trading some nice productive enterprise such as Andy's Diner for a piece of swamp? So far the matter has been informally discussed between Counci1members and between Gary and me. It's time to ask you to coordinate with your counterpart in Tukwila and provide me with a recommendation: this is advantageous for both entities to pursue or leave well enough alone. Your schedule is full, I realize, and this matter is not a top priority but could use your attention as soon as it is convenient. ~~t Shinpoch, Mayor cc: Mayor Van Dusen CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ____ _ WHEREAS the City Councils of the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are proposing amendments to the common border between the two communities; staff of both cities have identified the following to be the ~issues involved. I. On the grade crossing of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks at Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street, consideration is being given to moving the tracks closer together to reduce the costs of an under/overcrossing. The critical items here are the timing and costs. The total estimated cost is $7,000,000. Staff of both cities recommend at 50/50 share of the local cost of construction. It is advised that Tukwila and Renton reach an agreement to' word as follows: H As development warrants, the two jurisdictions will acknowledge that the route is needed and that both will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed." 2. King County Fire District III provides service to the Black River Quarry (along 68th Avenue South) even though a portion east of the existing railroad' tracks is within the corporate limits of the City of Tukwila. Staff raised the question as to whether or not this area should also be included in the boundary adjustment proposal. 3. A tunnel has been proposed at S.W. 43rd Street (South 180th Street) and West Valley Road (SR 181) due to such traffic concerns as safety and capacity at this location. Trains tie up the east/west flow of traffic on S.W. 43rd Street. This proposal is approximately a $3 million project of which the local share would be approximately $600,000. As with the Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street project, a SO/SO share of expenses for Renton and Tukwila is recommended. Staff has also raised the possibility that South 180th Street be added to the State of Washington system. RESOLUTION NO. _____ _ 4. It is recommended that the City of Renton assume the costs of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel located on the Burlington Northern property. This liability is assumed to be in excess of $300,000. 5. The Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Regarding dike maintenance, Renton's present share of cost is 22% or $31,200. Perhaps some adjustment in this obligation is warranted. 6. The City of Tukwila shall assume maintenance costs (and potential widening costs) for the Green River bridge at S.W. 43rd Street (South 180th Street) and West Valley Road (SR 181). Responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signal at this intersection shall be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement regarding utilities must be concluded. Renton shall retain ownership of those utilities north of S.W. 43rd Street and will be responsible for operation and maintenance. If the owner (Jacob Nielsen) of the dairy barns west of the railroad tracks requires water and sewer service, the City of Renton can provide these utilities (existing 12" water and 12" sewer mains are located east of the railroad tracks) as part of the interlocal agreement. Such an agreement would also tidy up the utility situation at Andy's Diner where Renton presently pays Tukwila for service. In addition, those utility users presently assessed a surcharge for service will no longer be charged such fees as a result of deannexation. 8. A city-state agreement will be required between the City of Renton and the State of Washington regarding transfer of costs to be assumed by the State for striping and associated improvements to SR 181 between S.W. 43rd Street (South 180th Street) and 1-405. This cost is presently estimated to be approximately $6,000. ._-.---::;-----;;--;,,----------------- I ----11-----------_._-----_._--_._---------_._--_._._._--.-.---- I .-------f--·-----·------·-·-·--·---------·-·-·-----·------------.--.---------------1. . .. . ... . ___ .... _. .---.---,---.---1----------.--------------------,---------------------------------- II II _______ . ____ I .. _ .. _._. ___ . __ . __ . ___ . ______ . ___ . ____ . ________ . _________ . ___ ._. ___ . ______ . ______ _ 'I 'V' 17 / // I Ii - ----~/q~~~~----------~--~~-~--------~------7 'lit I'~AO tP' /ll\A ~ _-l.~ /ht; . ~ .r?.... ,,1, . ,t:l-<' _____ "_-_--lI-~(b)Iii.:L7iL-~i2Q~""''':J/'LlL~S__'_? __ "'_'t'''_!i~t1-t2LUI,-tL1'&~e.,illh~=6=H&Jrw!...=~~ _______ f/ ___ ~_ . 7f. FTF 7. 2, At uf.. .J <? ~&ae£ A ~+t<r~ 11Z1'-7jJ 7;);' ~ cp Nt"", '(;.!r ? e~'J,.tj . , ____ T_ ..... -11I-=:!IG~'lti~'A~-.p-;;~~J~/l,~ .J) •• k~Q~_~...L[ 1~~I()~·fl'~.f~~~~'-~~I~' ~ ...... ~ I~~. "J------ -----4I=-I---",;~~ l.. R-s. -----~'l-~ ~~&-. ~. -#~ SR I ~/ -&~_.s~~jfll4.l~, \ _____ -I!Ir;;:~;';f7B.-'-. _ . . _____ . ___ _ ------~--~------------------------------------. L ______ ~-----------.----.----------------_. __________________ _ i I 1 1 ~ -!...,---#------------------.~ 2BB 25B 'l..' -- ~~~~ " ~ ,,/ I~ 8 'M.?i-==;~;/ ~~.:~. ~~~'t%Anr •• J s~p.c" -~~ -" ~ iN~ Lol.t 1) \ >l -f-Jt-O CHICAGO MILWAUKEE & ~jl -. -.---. - --. _. - . !1!§:!~ • ....:.JI..' __ _ ATLAS OF SEATTLE KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC .. SEATTLE SCALE: 200 FT=l IN. COPYRIGHT K, 114. CO., INC. -- I/:-\ ~f:J REPRODUCTION IN ~ OR FMT FOR PERSONAL U~ RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY , / I 'I ~e. f1Z)W 1'2 1, I I ,I . ~ \V ("-lv-., \ I I { \J / 0 u / ~ . . I - ...,.1 .... --------~ffl~~·~~·#~'S~--------------------------------------~_,4# • _/)(/ ... /,. _J .• ~_ -, ,-, --_. __ ._----+--_._----_._----_._._----_._----------------------_. __ ._---_.-._ .. _-_._._._._---_._._--_._--- - -------1t-c.--------------------------.------------------------.-.--.--.-------.. --.-.. ---.---~ -----.-.------\t----.-.-.-------------------------.--------... ----------.-.-------.------------.---.-.-----.------ -------T---~-------------------------------------~ -_.--------"-------------------_.---------....... -------------- I' .~ . '", .~~ ~~ ~~~ /f'33-/tf5i ", I .~ T E R 0 F FIe E M E ~, ~ TO: Files DATE: August 4, 1987 FROM: City Clerk SUBJECT: Annexation and De-Annexation Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment (A-002-86) Certificates. Per telephone message with Carrie Trimnell, Policy Development on August 4th -The Office of Financial Management combined the two certificates into one. We have only one original with the information combined from both certifcates on the one fully executed certificate. .. ' :.;:~ .. -!...~-...... " ~ _.) .... "~~ ---~." ,.,. u.; ..... Ca.U. ' ...... ,It"" .. "Po Not StpaAAte ... .;1 ." 11\i3 form nust be Cilk'C! out in tripl101lte~ all 8~-·'· WHI'rn -Oeria! of .·in.."U\C'ial K1n.lqeftl!nt plt'1l'cntdry doc:urI!nts IImt be in tripLicato with the C'JINAKt -D.::p.art:1rcnt of flictw.:ays C!~tiCJ'l of the Special PopUlatiat Census ~. PlNK .. To be ~tumcd to City or 'lbwn after "RImval . , ~.- ...... '. Revised 11/82 , .j . "" ,: -.' ... , :i; '. INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date April 28, 1987 TO; Policy Development FROM; Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk SUBJECT; Annexat~on-Renton/Tukwi1a Boundary Adjustment-(A-002-S6) -Annexation and De-Annexation Certificates D D MEM;j1~ gn cc; We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above- captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official public records. Copies should be forwarded to and the other for your file. Pursuant to your memo of we return herewith document's), as above-captioned, which have been signed by City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution by State of Washington We return herewith recorded document(s), as above-captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official public records. Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained as necessary for your files. Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office for our permanent records when received. Thank you. Enclosures (2) • "- 1M. lunn n be 1I1Ic'<l uut Ln lr1Vll""Le .. ..I .11 .",. phwrcntdry aji:uretts pust be in tdpllCclto with the r.~tiQ"l of IC cinl lIOpUlaucn Census Schadulea. \ttwm -utU!.ll of .'ll\\Hcial JoL.luoll#!ftUlll CNwrt -ccpart.ncnt of IUCjtwaya PlNK -To be rotumod to City or Totm of tar IppIOYal. ANNEXATION CERTIFICATE STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Policy Analysis &: ForE\casting Division Insurance Building, M.S. AQ-44 Olympia, W A 98504-0201 READ CARf:fULLV TilE EXI'l.l\UATORY NOTE BEFORE FJLI.ING OUT TillS CI;RTIFICATE YJI'EI '11le follo."ling infonratioo is neoe~ary Nod n1.\St be enclOSt'ld hc,.·tOl'U the MIf'l(:x.:llion can be piooosscd (1Ol 35.13.260), 4. 1ho tiLllle oopiea of the \lfV\CXAtioo oul"'tificatc amuld be fitled out an"cl ~i.9j:cd. b. Tllltte. copies of the relevant ORlII'tDlU ooot..unin<] the 11..'4,1 d:'>scription of UK' annexed territory. c. Th'ler' MAlJS of the anru:::)C(j area. 'n1C 11\lf'O should o.:Ilfoon tJ) il<,.'ceptablt' mgiJloodng stanolards, inclulinq directional arnw, scue, prcp:.!rly dcsignilted streets, highways, railro.'lro, dYers, lJlocl~!:;. olI'ld other physical characteriauas relevant to the territory and bol.lldariea of tho:! AnnC);L'(j Area as well a."I (nusti'l9 municipal limits with tho area ~ outllnod in red. 'Ihc r..ap s.hall be on an af)" X ll" GIK:ct or folded to tr.dl Ilhe. d. One CXVI ot the Special Population ~UJ Sdlcdules used to unll"r.rate t.J.x:, popu.lat..i.on of the onnexccl &wa. I. Name of citv or town .... l.\!;lntQ!l............................... . .................... ,. . .................................................................................. . 2. Was a Bour.dary Review Board or Annexation Review Board hearing held?.No ........... Date ................ . 3, Ordinance Number? ............. 4Q!I'O .......................... . 4. According to what statute(s) was this annexation accomplished?BCW ... J.::iI.\ .•. U .•. 3.Q ....... RCW .... l5 .•. 1Q .•. 2.n ... 5. When was this ordinance passed ? ........... !.~~~.~!:¥. .... ~~.~ .... ~.~.~.? ............ .. 6. When was this ordinance published? ...... ~":~':!.~,,¥. .... ?.~.1. ... ~.~.!l.7. .................................................................................................................. . 7. How many days after publication did this ordinance become effective? .............. !.2. ............................................... . 8. On what date did this annexation become part of the municipality? .... ~~I:>"':!.a.,,y. ... ~.! .... ~.~~?. ........ _ ........... .. 9. Area of this annexation in acres? ... .*). .. 4 .•. Q:I. ........................................ . 10. How many housing units, including vacant units were existent in the annexed area on the date . '. b t f th ., I·t? 0 thiS territory ecame a par 0 e mumclpa I y ................................................................. .. 1 \. How many housing units in the annexed area were occupied on the date this territory became a f h ., l't? 0 . part 0 t e mumclpa 1 y .......................................................... .. 12. Population of annexed area on the date this territory became a part of the municipality? (Number of residents determined by actual count) ................. !? .................................... .. DefinitiO'lS and procedures in aensus taKing, as set forth by the Office of Financial Managenent, must be foll<>oled. Special Populaticn Census Schedules and EnwneJl4to4'. llanWll4 are available cr& request. I hereby certify that, to effect the above unllcxation, all legal requirements have been satisfi.ed. and that the data set forth in this certificate, including the attached documents, are true and correct, ,'.. . ~' (Signed)BW~~Y,)t, .. ¥.\ .. (\{l1t<.Jd. ..... . :"'M41101' IS.AL] Date .. :~:I.-::cd2:::::?..7.... Attest:~·C'm~ CIIV (Town) CI.,.Jc Date?! ..,.a?7=J.:;z: ........ Revised 11/82 OFFICE RECORD year .................... .. File NumbeI: .................................................... .. Date received Certificate Approved by: ·_·········· ... ,;·C.;:t,-iji .... O·;,"i.1Ai·······H • H •• Date ................................................................ . Remarks ....................... . Form 170.1 .-SPEC ttL POPULATION CE~S SUMMARY SHEET STATE 0' WASHINGTON *TOTAL POPULATION 0 ( Li nes A + 1-8 + """2 -"""'8,--+....,C ... )-- CITY OR TOWN -=.R=e:.:.nt:.:o:.:.n:....-_____ _ UNITS PER STRUCTURE III III CII co, CII . C.' C1I EXCLUDE TOTAL VACANT OCCUPIED POP-AV. POP. !oCCUPANCY VACANCY HOUS ING HOUS I NG HOUS NG ULATION PER H.U. RAH RATE MOBILE ~OMES/TRAILERS UNITS UNITS UNITS COli-lll:CII CII ;e1l:C" CZhCII:C" I-A I IINIT STRUCTURES 2-A 7 UNIT STRUCTURES )-A 1 UNIT STRUCTURES C.-A " UNIT STRUCTURES ~ ·A S OR MORE UNITS A. TOTALS * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III CII III co, CI' ,~~,!~~ .. ~v ".~:~,~v H8~r VACANT IO~~~H~~ AV. POP. SECTI ON 8 III i{~G HOUS ING POP-PER H.U. ;~;II:~:' I ,.··~f.~~~' UNITS ULATION M08ILE HOMES/ 1* 1-B TRAILERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-8 SPECIAL"* n 0 1* 0 n i ··Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit (e.g .• boats, boxcars. tents. etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting -resident N criteria. S~ec1fy type of housing. GROUP QUARTERS I l NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOMES 2,( COLLEGE DORMITORIES 3 t MENTAL & PENAL INSTITUTIONS 4-r. MILITARY INSTALLATIONS ,-f OTHER: C.TOTAL GIOU' OUAUI!U COMMENTS OFFICE LOCATION OF CITV/TOWN CLERK OR CENSUS ADMINISTRATOR: Municipal Bldg. 200 Mill Aye, S., Renton WA 98055 OAVS/HOURS OF OPERATION: 8-5, M-F (Revised 2/86) Of" P-120.Z NUMBER OF 0 . SIGNEO: builiWuu (MAYOR) POPULAT ION .. 0 , .tt;. ~\u.{\.p Cl J-...., (DATE) ATTEST:~0z~ft1-1-t'7 ! (DATE CENSUS ADMINISTRATOR I ( ( EilUMERATION DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET POPULATION BY UNIT TYPE HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE "VACANT UNITS BY TYPE <C I '" UNITS '" UNITS '" '<C W UNITS ... ... ... w '" ~---' ---' -a> :r <z IN <z IN <z ~ ~ IN ... ~ Q~ ... :::> Q~ ... :::> Q --' Z <> z< <> z< 0 zo( z ... '" ~b STRUCTURE .... '" ~b STRUCTURE ... '" "" ... '" STRUCTURE '" a> '" "'0 0 u ::>0 co ... :::>0 co ... :::>0 co .... <> '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ 5PECi GQ ..; ~ 1 2 3 4 5+ fIIi/T SPEC GQ 1 2 3 4 5+ MHIT SPEC GQ 1 2 3 4 5+ 1O<{1 '" 26 1 0 0 0 *;-:-' 0 0 :::::::: . ::" 0 ~~ :::!:::! : 1~:: :::::::: . ~ :::::::: 0'. ::::~:: :::::::: ::: .. :) ::::~:~ :::::::: J::{~ I :::::::: ], . :.-.. '::!:::: ::: . '.:. ::::::: I ' .. ~::., ::::::: !: ~j: '::::::: :: " , .::~: :::::::: "' ::::. If. :::::::: :::::::: :::::~~ :::!:::! :::::::: ::~:::":: .:::::: :::::::: "::m :.: . .-: I :::::::: It ,0-• ::::::: : .... ~ ::::::: ~-: ::::~~ :::::;: ::~:~: '::~!:: ::::::: :::::~::; ::~."" :::::::: lW :';/:: " !::::::: } .. ,,! " " I :::::::: I :::::::: ~ "' :::::::: ::W3 :::~~: :::::::: :!:=::*' :~:~: :::::::: :~:~~ ::~::: :::::::: .::::::?~ :!:!:.," .' :~:~::: ::::::::~ §: .. ::::::: ~::::::~ W :~\~\~\~ .~:~:~~~ i f{' !OoI •• : ;~:~ (Revised 2/86) ~rw c_Izo.3 ., HH UNIT TYPE # 1 2 3 4 5+ ... -f- POPULATION TOTAL . *PAGE HOUSING UNIT TOTAL TOTAL VACANCY TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL . *BLOCK HOUSING UNIT TOTAL TOTAL VACANCY TOTAL . BLOCK SUMMARY SHEET TABULATION OF POPULATION BY STRUCTURE TYPE HH Mli/T SPEC. GO # 1 · · . . . . 0 . . 0 · . · 0 . . 0 · · . · . 0 . · . · 0 * Use Block Total If Block Needs More Than One Page 2 3 City / Co u n ty ~R;:::;en,-,-,t""on,,-=-__ E.O. 262 Block ...:1~_ Page 1 Of _...:1 __ UNIT TYPE 4 .21-. MH/T SPEC. GO .. IIlltl~ill - (Revised 2/86) OFH P-120.4 SPECI~' POPULATION CENSUf SCHEDULE "":' Y •• r __ B_7 __ _ E.D./Tract No. 262 CitylTown Renton vFFICE . OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICY ANALYSIS & FORECASTING DIVISION STATE OF WASHINGTON Block Nu. ___ 1.--__ Palle No. 1 LINE NO. -.L -'- -L ...!.. -2.. J... ~ --B.. ~ -.lQ. .Jl .J1. .Jl. .J.! J2 -1Ji. --1L ..J.§.. -1l 20 -=-:- ~1 ~ ...ll. ~ .1! ~5 0 .. E"-tAU Onlu Enumerator CT .~ 2.. 1 • S • . 7 • SIREn APT .• HOUSING NUM!![R or ~BILE -KAHE or EACH PERION WI~IE UIUAL PLACE or ABODE ON IHE OR HOUSE AODRESI UNIT UNITI IN NO. HOME/ SPEC. " ROAD SEQ. NO. IIAUCIURE RAILER ""IT Spec. HHIT Spec. MHiT Spec. MHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. MH/T Spec. MHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. ""IT Spec. MHIT Spec . HHIT Spec. MHIT Spec . MH/T Spec. MH/T Spec. HHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. MHiT Spec. MHIT Spec. MHiT Spec. HHiT Spec. MIIIT Spec. ""IT Spec. MH/T Spec. • Each housing unit in structures having only one house address. but more than one unit. should be separately Identified by the letter or number appearing on the mail box and lor door. •• Specfal Housing: Unusual living quarters not generallv considered a housing unit (e.!) .. boats. boxcars. tents. etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting "resident" criteria. Specify type of housing. DAI[ or EliONER'IIN. WAI IN IHII HDUI~HOlO (r"teA. llUt NMll ~wtl PAGE TOTALS persons __ O ____ _ Total Housing Un1t6 __ 0_ Vacant Units 0 Occupied Units 0 -(Revised 2/B6) OFM P-120.1 LINE NO. 1 2 1 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 i No Co.IIo ... V""CA ~ .. d'" • Po Not Stp<WL« Fo ... (i l' .~-d out. in triplicate and all 8'4-" . ta lUSt 00 in tripUCcltll with the Spe 61 lIOpUlabQl Centn ... ScilQdulea. "II'll: -OC(iw of t'in.lI\cial H.lr~t CItW« • ll:\"U'tI1IlIlt of ILigl"""Y1 PlNK .. To be rotumod to City or Town 6ft':Gr eppmval ANNEXATION CERTIFICATE STATE OF WASHINGTON tti FFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT D. ~. ANNEVA-.r"I Policy Analysis &: PorE\casting Division '/"r"\ I I . Insurance Building, M.S. AQ-44 Olympia, WA 9.8504-0201 RE:AD CARP.FULLY 'rUE EXl'1.l\IlATOHY NOTE BEFORE FILI.INC; OUT TillS CI:RTIFICATE NJn!:. 'lhe tolw-.Jing infofIMtiQ) .is neoel:>8ary arA Itn~t 00 enclosod tll.-[Ol'U the AmCX<ltion can be prc:a:sacd. (fOl lS.13.260) I ill. 1ho tJlllfe. oopies of the ~t.iCl) Q.:rtificatc amulet he fi lled out and ~ igJ:cd. b. Tllllu oopies of tho relevant ORDIN.'lU CXlI'It.."Unin'J Ule lcg.ll d:'scripticn of U\(." olMe>eed territory. c. Thlau 'HAIlS of the annela:! area. 'n1C"1I."lpG should o.JI1foDTI t.o ilC.."Ce~t.ablt' mglnocrinq stand.uds, including direct.icnlll arro.I. scale, prcplrly dcsign.lted street.<i, hi1]llWays, 1";\llro:Id~, rivers. IJtocl~c.. 3Ild other physical characterlsUca relevant to the territory and bollldilricn. of ~ ~);t.>d area as wal.l a. ... c~stiHq municipal li.mits with the area GIV\eMld outlined in red. 1hc r:lap SMll be on an 8'1" X 11" ch:.'ct or fo1:1('£1 to tl'.dl.: r:;ize. d. Ont <XVI of the S!lucial Population QmsI.U Schedules ~~d to CfllFf.·rate tht~ populaLion of the GMeXDCS a.rea. I. Name of city or town... . ... I\~n.1:.'.'n........................ ...... . . ...... ..... .... . ................................................................................ . 2. Was a Bour.dary Review Board or Annexation RC\'iew Board hearing held? .... Na ........ Date ............. . 3. Ordinance Number? ............ 404,Q...................... ......... RCW 35A.14.300 4. According 10 what statute(s) was this annexation accomplished? .. !l:Ci.'! .. J.:?. ... lQ .•. ~.l.:z. ................................ . 5. When was this ordinance passed? ....... ,J..~!.l),!.il.J;:Y_ .. 19. ..... _19B7. ........... _ ................................................................................................... . 6. When was this ordinance published ? .... .:r.anuax::t .... 23., .... 19.B7 .................... . 7. How many days after publication did this ordinance become effective? ............... l~ .... : .......................................... . 8. On what date did this annexation become part of the municipality? ... Ji:~.l,>ElJ":EY. .... ~ ... _ .. ~.~~.? ....................... . 9. Area of this annexation in acres? .... lQ.l. •. 6..5............................. .... 10. How many housing units, including vacant units were existent in the annexed area on the date this territory became a part of the municipality? ............. 2 ........................................ . 11. How many housing units in the annexed area were occupied on the date this territory became a part of the municipality? .............. ~..................................... . 12. Population of annexed area on the date this territory became a part of the municipality? (Number of residents determined by actual count) .............. J ....................................... .. tefinitiQlS and procedures in census taJ<ing. as set forth l:rt the Office of Financial Manaqenent. must be followed. Special PopulatiCJ\ Census Schedules and EnwneJUl.to4' 6 llanua.t.\ axe available CJ\ xequest. I hereby certify that, to effect the above tlnllcxation. all legal requirements have been satisfied. and that the data set forth in this certificate, including the attached documents, aTe true and correct. .~ . . . . (Signed).~~~Y.:~~~~~ ISEALI Date ..... :::1 .. ~ .. i?:..2~.f...7 ...... . Attesl~.J:p~ CilU (Town) CleTk Date .. ~~d.2 .... ff'..z.. ..... .. Revised 11/82 OFFICE RECORD year .......................... File Number .................................................... .. Date received ................................................................................... . Certificate Approved by: ·-······-···j .. ,.c.r\r;;i-;i·o'it~,&i···-·-··· Date .............................................................. .. Remarks ..................... . For .. 170.1 I .. SPEC"L POPULATION CE~' 15 SUMMARY SHEET STATE O' WASHINGTON *TOTAL POPULATION 3 ( Line s A + 1-B + -='2 -~B"'::"'+ ~C"')--C lTV OR TOWN __ R_e_n_t_on _______ _ UNITS PER STRUCTURE III II' m co, CI, c., TOTAL VACANT OCCUPIED AV. POP. ~CCUPAHCY EXCLUDE HOUS'NG HOUS'NG HOUS NG POP-. PER H.U. RAH MOBILE ~OMES/TRAILERS UNITS UNITS UNITS ULATION CO'~II"CI' lllill"'" I-A I liN IT STRUCTURE S ~ o . ~ , 1. 33 1 2-A 1 UNIT STRUCTURES 3-A 1 UNIT STRUCTURES "-A I, UNIT STRUCTURES S-A .S OR HORE UNITS A. TOULS * 2 0 2 3 1.33 1 III II' IOCC~fl~e Co, AV. "t;P-. ~C~~~NCY SECTION B TOTAL VACANT POP-HOUS ING HOUSING H~~~TS ULATION PER H.U. UNITS UNITS (II ;111'''' MOBILE HOMES/ 1* 1-B TRAILERS 0 0 0 0 0 12-B SPECIAL** " n 1* 0 0 ··Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit (e,g .• boats. boxcars, tents, etc.). Only counted ~hen occupied by person meetin9 "resident" criteria. S~ec1fy type of housing. . m VACANCY RATE CZ'~C"'C7I 0 0 ( 7' VACANCY RATE I CZHU,C7I 0 GROU P QUARTERS NUMBER OF POPULA T ION I ( NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOMES 2,( COLLEGE DORMITORIES l l MENTAL t PENAL INSTITUTIONS 4-r. MILITARY INSTALLATIONS ,·f OTHER: C. TOTAL GROUI' QUAIUIS COMMENTS -' OFFICE LOCATION OF CITY/TOWN CLERK OR CENSUS ADMINISTRATOR: Municipal Bldg. 200 Mjll Aye. S .• Renton. WA 98055 DAYS/HOURS OF OPERATION: 8-5, M-F (Revised.ZI86) OfH P-120.Z * 0 0 ( ( EilUMERATION DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET POPULATION BY UNIT TYPE HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE 'VACANT UNITS BY TYPE « I ~ ~ ~ I « w UNITS .... UNITS .... UNITS w '" -'--'-.... '" '" -'-I <20 "20 <20 !i => IN I .... => 0-, IN .... => 0-' IN .... => i 0-' 20 0 20" 0 20< 0 z< z .... ~ :lib .... ~ :lib .... ~ I ...... '" STRUCTURE '" STRUCTURE '" STRUCTURE '" 'OiIT SPEC! GQ I "'0 c ~ =>0 '" .... =>0 '" .... =>0 "' .... 0 ~~ ~~ ..; -' 2 3 4 5+ ""IT SPEC GQ 1 2 3 4 5+ "'IT SPEC GQ 1 2 3 4 5+ V>~ '" 26 1 3 3 3 2 2 I: 2 0 0 ::::=::: ,:,-oJ 0 ... ~ ;:;:::;: : m~ :::::::: .'X s:;:;:: :::::::: " ::~?: :::::::: :.. I :.:-. '0 ~:;:::: :-...... :::::::: ::?!:~i .... 'fi.. .:-: ••.. ::::;:;: i$l .~.: '::::::: •••• ..... 1 .:.. I ':~ ;:::::; ::;>. I :: ::::::: Ii .... 0,.::;) '::::::: :: ,0' 1::::::::: :::::::: :?:f1. :::::::: :::::::: :::::~? ~::~:: :;:;:;:; .... ); ... ::::'-:-:1 i ~: :::::::: ::::*1 (RevlSI!(! 2/86) M'" 0-111'),3 - • HH UNIT TYPE # 1 2 3 4 5+ 2 2. . -f--· - ' .. - POPULATION TOTAL . *PAGE HOUSING UNIT TOTAL TOTAL VACANCY TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL . *BLOCK HOUSING UNIT TOTAL TOTAL VACANCY TOTAL . BLOCK SUMMARY SHEET TABULATION OF POPULAT ION BY STRUCTURE TYPE HH MH/T SPEC. GO # 1 . · 3 · · . · 2 · · . · . . 0 . · · 3 . · . · 2 · · · . 0 * Use Block Total If Block Needs More Than One Page City/County Renton E . D. 262 Block --=1,,--_ Page -1-Of ~1 __ _ UNIT TYPE 2 3 4 5+ MH/T SPEC. GO , .' . ;j. (Revised 2/86) OFH P-120.4 - · . SPEC'" POPULATION CENSUt SCHEDULE , •• ,_-'8:.7'--__ OFFICE, OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POI.ICY ANALYSIS & FORECASTING DIVISION 262 E.D./Tract No,-::-__ Clty/Town,_~R",e",n"-t,,,o=n ___ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON Block NO. __ --i1;-__ Page No. 1 LINE NO. ...L .L -1... ...i.. .2.. ....6... ....L ...JL i -1Q. .ll .J1. ....!l ..li -.Ji .JJi. ..ll .Jll. -1i 20 -=-=- .1l E .1l. .li ,5 One. EtttlllJ Only Enumerator CT I 2 l -"-S 6 " 1 B SlR££I APT ,-HOUSING NUHBER Of MOBILE ' NAIIE or EACH PERSON .'IOSE USUAL PLACE or ABODE ON lHE LINE OR !lOUSE ADDRESS NO. U~IT UNITS IN HOMEI SPEC .• OAT( or ClnJM(RAT INI WAS IH THIS HOUSEHOlD NO. RDAO SEQ. NO. SlRUClURE RAILER If rttCA. bu t IWuII ~w(J 7210 1 '1 HH/T Spec. Weitzel, Randall 1 71r;o 2 1 HHIT Spec. Clevenger, James 2 HHIT Spec. Clevenger, Mrs. James 3 HHIT Spec. 4 HH/T Spec. S HHIT Spec. 6 ->< nl HH/T Spec. 7 3: >< - 'Cl HHIT Spec. 8 nl .. l!l HHIT Spec. .<; 9 ., :> HHIT Spec. 10 0 Ul MHIT Spec. 11 HHIT Spec. 12 HH/T Spec . 13 HHIT Spec. 14 HHIT Spec. 15 MHIT Spec • .16 HHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. HHIT Spec. MHIT Spec. * Each hous1n9 unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit. should be separately identified by the letter or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. ** Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit (e.g .• boats. boxcars. tents. etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting "resident" criteria. Specify type of housing. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PAGE TOTALS Persons 3 Total Housing Units--,2,,-_ Vacant UnitS ___ -"O'-_ Occupied Units ___ 2 __ {Revised 2/86} OFM P~120.1 April 20. ! 987 ParkS: Community Event Mobile Stage Donation by Renton Rotary Club CAG: 86-073, Renton Municipal Airpolt Utilities Item 6.f. Appointment Human Rights and Affairs Commission CORRESPONDENCE Garbage: Metro/YMCA Hazardous Waste Disposal Program OLD BUSINESS Citizen Comment Valla - Loop Renton Cjty Council Minutes Page 134 Parks Department requested review of Renton Rotary Club donation in the amount of $20,000 for community event mobile stage with accompanying request that the City of Renton contribute to the total cost. Refer to Community Services Committee. Public Works/Utility Engineering Department submitted CAG-073-86, Renton Municipal Airport Utilities; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $20,316.72, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $27,789.02 if all required releases have been received. Council concur. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch reappointed the fonowing persons to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for two-year terms effective to April 25, 1989: Marilyn Bingaman, 310 Williams Avenue S., Renton (first appointed in '1978); Sally Carlson, 12655 SE 169th Place, Renton (first appointed in 1985); Barbara Lansing, 7271 S. 129th Street, Seattle (first appointed in 1977); and Rose Raihala. 442 Burnett Avenue N., Renton (first appointed in 1985). MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND AFFAIRS COMMISSION. CARRIED. Letter from Mayor Shinpoch was'read reporting that Metro and the YMCA are sponsoring a hazardous waste disposal program and have designated several collection points in the county where cities and/or private citizens may dispose of hazardous household waste such as old paint, medicines, and insecticides. She urged Council to approve a resolution permitting Renton to participate in the program by informing the public, contributing manpower to the closest site in Kent, and by contributing to the cost. Metro will pay 35% of the total $141,000 cost, with the remainder being shared by cities at seven cents per person. Renton's share of $2,382 can be secured from the utility account. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REQUEST AND REFER THE MATTER TO WA YS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Letter was read from Robert Valla, P.E., P.O. Box 448, Renton, supporting Anti-Cruising Ordinance adopted by Council on 4/13/87, but reporting personal hardship due to location of his private engineering practice in loop area. To alleviate the inconvenience to business people and residents who must use downtown streets during restricted hours, Mr. Valla suggested that passes be issued to Qualified persons on a need basis. Mayor Shinpoch advised that such a practice would be illegal, and it is the City's intent to enforce the ordinance without discrimination. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Ordinance _4058 Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Ordinance _4059 PUD Ordinance: Signage Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: An ordinance was read rezoning properties annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila as result of boundary adjustment: Parcel I, located north of Grady Way and east of Monster Road to L-I, Light Industry, and Parcel 2, located south of Longacres and west of Oakesdale Avenue SW (if extended) to M-P, Manufacturing Park, zones. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-2711 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code concerning on-site signs notifying the public of a Planned Unit Development, and establishing requirements prior to issuance of building permit for Planned Unit Development. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 A YES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, KEOLKER, HUGHES, CLYMER. I NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Mr. Stredicke indicated his opposition to the entire PUD ordinance. · . ORDINANCES WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRI L 20, 1987 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and. final reading: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Rezone (Parcell located north of Grady Way and East of Monster Road; Parcel 2 located South of Longacres and West of Oakesdale Avenue SW) Amending PUD Ordinance concerning Public Notification Signage Interest Rate Charges on Unpaid Balances on Latecomers Agreements APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 21694 through No. 22015 in the amount of $682,096.22 and Vouchers No. 22019 through No. 22021 in the amount of $68,854.47. Ear C ymer A", ~c.t;;~ , '~"'j' - I"' I, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJa; e ,being first duly sworn on oath states that helshe is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week, That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington, Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News JournaL-, Daily Record Chronicle-X-, Daily Globe News __ , (and _ not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period, The annexed notice a OFEliaefle e 1:0. q 0:58 was published on ~ppil 24, 1957 TI2212 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 73.80 Subscribed and sworn to before VN #87 Revised 10184 Oth dayof April!9~, ry Public for the State fWashington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington, ORDINANCE NO, 4058 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REN· TON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING A ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES FORMERLY ZONED IN TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT REZONE LU/GEN -4) WHEREAS Ihe properly hereinbelow described has until recently annexed to the CIIy of Renlon been in Tukwila, King Coun. Iy, Washington; and WHEREAS two public hearings to estab- lish zoning for this annexed property hav. Ing been held thereon on or about Fabruary 9, 1987 and March 23, 1987, and said matter having been duly considered by the City Council and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehen- slvB Plan, as amended. and the City Caun. ell having duly considered all matters rele. vant thereto, and all parties having been " heard appearing In, support thereof or in , opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;SECTION I: The following , described property in tha City of Ranton is , hereby rezoned to Light Industry (L-l) and Manufacturing (M·P) as herainbelow spaci· I fied; the 'Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinl:!once, as amended. to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Sse Exhibit "A': attached hereto and made a part hereof 'as if fully set forth herein. (Parcel 1 being localed north of Grady Way and East of Monster Road; Parcel 2 being located South of Longacres and West of Oakesdale Avenue S,W, (if extend· ed),SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of April, 1987, Maxine E, Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of April, 1987 Barbara y, Shinpoch, Mayor, Approved as to form: ~wrence J. Warren, City AHomey ORDINANCE NO, 4058 EXHIBIT "A" LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") PARCEL ONE (1) Zoned L·' Light Industry FOSTER GOLF COURSE , TO BLACK RIVER PARCEL A parc~1 of land currently In the City of , , -Tukwila lying within a portion of the south· , west V. of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W,M, , and In the southeast V4 of Section 14,' T23N, R4E, W.M" also within that portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Volume 12 of Plats, page 75, records of King Coun· Iy, Washington and described more partic· ularly as follows: Beginning at the Intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacif- ic Railway right-of-way as recorded respec- tively in Volume 921, page 263, Volume i 825, page 545, Volume 930, pege 305 of Deeds, records of King County. and the easterly extension to the northeasterly mar-t gin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right·of·way and the TRUE POINT OF ' BEGINNING: thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less ' to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as j shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence southeasterly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to the centerline of ! 69th Avenue South (Also known as Sleel Hill Road, County Rd, No, 8, and Monster I Road); thence southeasterly along said centerline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the Black River; thence westerly along said thread to the northeasterly mar-r gin of the old Chicago. Milwaukee, and S1. , Paul Railroad right-o'-way margin; thence i northwesterly along said northeasterly mar- gin 500 feet mo~e or less to its intersection I with the southwesterly margin of the Bur- lington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad): thence along a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a dis- tance of 100 feet to the northeasterly mar- gin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (for· merly Pacific Coast Railroad): thence northwesterly along said northeasterly mar- gin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, J Published in the Valley Daily News April 24, 1987 R2212 I ., CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4058 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING A ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES FORMERLY ZONED IN TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT REZONE LU/GEN -4) WHEREAS the property hereinbelow described has until recently annexed to the City of Renton been in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS two public hearings to establish zoning for this annexed property having been held thereon on or about February 9, 1987 and March 23, 1987, and said matter having been duly considered by the City Council and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industry (L-l) and Manufacturing (M- P) as hereinbelow specified; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit ftA" attached her~to and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. 1 · ... ORDINANCE NO. 4058 (Parcel 1 being located north of Grady Way and East of Monster Road 1 Parcel 2 being located South of Longacres and West of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. (if extended». SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of April, 1987. ~g~ MaXlne E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of April, 1987. ~~*. $il\'n.Q~'-~ Barbara 1\ Shinpocb, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrc£g:"J,":'Wfr~ M'l'orney Date of Publication: April 24, 1987 CITY1:3/27/76 .. 2 ." ORDINANCE NO. 4058 EXHIBIT "A" LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") PARCEL ONE (1) Zoned L-1 Light Industry FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACK RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.11., als'o within that portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Vol~'me f'2 of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more par~icularly as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 821, page 263, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (Also known as S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easte~IY along said e::tension to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence southeo>.sterly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to the centerlin~ of 68th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road, c.ounty f':d.No. S, and ~Ionster Road); thence so~'thee.sterly along said centerline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the Black River; thence we5terly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad right-oi-way margin; thence northwesterly along said north- eAsterly margin 5~) feet more or less to its intersection with the southwesterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence along.a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeAsterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly Pacific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF 8EGINNING. ORDINANCE NO. 4058 EXHIBIT nAil LANDS TO RENTON ("SOUTHERN") PARCEL TWO (2) ZONED M-P Manufacturing 'Park BU'RLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL VACATION That portion of Section 25, T23N, R4E, W.M., de&cribed a&, -I'ollow&: Commencing at the intersection of the easterly'margin 0-1' West Valley Highway (Formerly known 01& Secondary State Highway No. 5-~1) and the north 1 i ne 0-1' the &outh 991) feet 0-1' the north- wa&t 1/4'of said Section :5, thence easterly along said north 1ine,660 feet more or less to the easterl'y margin 0-1' the Northern F'acific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence con- tin~ling along said north 1 ine 510 fe'et more or less to the ea&t line of said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres 0-1' the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section :5, 1320 -I'eet more or less to the east line of &aid subdivision; thence southerly along satd east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 0-1' the southeast 1/4 of said Section :5, ::60 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/~ of Section :5; thence westerly along the south line 0-1' said north- west 1/4 0-1' the southeast 1/4 of said Section 2~, and along the south line 0-1' the north 1/2 0-1' the southwest 1/4 0-1' said Section 25, 542.81 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad; ,thence northerl·,. along said easterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • , i i' ! ' ),,' .. :, ... B _ .. , ,~ . , (I) "' i. '-, .. ~"" : .. .. ~., ,,-) r"' , .1 " .. <,,,. j • / .:' .. ) • _'j" I' April 13. 1987 Ordinance #4057 Loop: Anti-Cruising Ordinance RECESS Ways and Means Committee(cont.) Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment PUD Ordinance: Signage Finance: Latecomer Agreements, Interest Rates on Unpaid Balance Resolution #2674 Loop: Anti-Cruising Ordinance Geographical Areas Resolution #2675 Finance: Authorizing Municipal Court Banking Signatures Covenant Development Corporation Purchase/Sale Agreement Renton Cjty Council Minutes Page 127 An ordinance was read amending Chapter I of Title X (Traffic) of City Code by adding a new section defining cruising, prohibiting cruising during declared times of congested traffic, and declaring a cruising violation a misdemeanor subject to a $250 fine. The ordinance would restrict any motor vehicle from passing a traffic control point two times within a two hour period in a posted no-cruising area. Chairman Keolker indicated that the Police Department has provided a draft implementation plan, and a companion resolution defining geographical areas subject to the cruising law has been prepared (see later). MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Upon inquiry, it was clarified that enforcement of the ordinance would apply to all violators, and no distinction would be made between young people and adults. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED. - MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:58 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:07 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: An ordinance was read rezoning properties annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila as result of boundary adjustment: Parcel I, located north of Grady Way and east of Monster Road to L-I, Light Industry, and Parcel 2, located south of Longacres and west of Oakesdale Avenue SW (if extended) to M-P, Manufacturing Park, zones. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-27 I I of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code concerning on-site signs notifying the public of a Planned Unit Development, and establishing requirements prior to issuance of building permit for Planned Unit Development. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Chairman Keolker reported the recommendation of the City A ttorney to require PUD signage by ordinance rather than policy as was Council's original intent. Upon Council inquiry, assurance was given that the codified Zoning Code, available to the public, will be updated to include this PUD ordinance amendment. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending portions of Section 8-7 I 7 of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) and Section 3-241 of Title III (Departments) of City Code concerning interest rate charges on unpaid balances on latecomers agreements. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: A resolution was read establishing geographical areas subject to enforcement of cruising ordinance: South 3rd from Rainier Avenue to Mill Avenue South; South 2nd Street from Mill Avenue to Rainier Avenue South; Rainier Avenue South from Grady Way to NW 3rd; and SW 7th Street from Rainier to Lind Avenue SW. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. A resolution was read authorizing signatures for the Municipal Court and Municipal Court Witness Fee Revolving Fund Account at Old National Bank, the City'S financial institution. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending approval of the Covenant Development Corporation purchase/sale agreement for a portion of right-of-way on 103rd Place SE lying south of Carr Road, and authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. It was noted that an annexation of the subject site, which contains the water tower, is underway; 10% petition was approved by Council on 12/15/86. ORDINANCES WAYS AND MEAtJS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 13, 1987 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Plaid Pantry Markets, Inc. Street Vacation (VAC-005-86) -Portion of Sunset Blvd. NE and NE 10th Street Ridgeview Annexation (A-OOl-86) -16 acres at SE 100th Place and NE 24th Street Fence and Hedge Ordinance Cruising Ordinance The Ways and Means Connnittee recommends the fo11 owi ng ordi nances for fi rst reading: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Rezone (Parcell located north of Grady Way and East of Monster Road; Parcel 2 located South of Longacres and West of Oakesdale Avenue SW) Correspondence on PUD Ordinance Signage from Zoning Administrator Interest Rate Charges on Unpaid Balances on Latecomers Agreements RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the· following resolutions for reading and adoption: Establishing Areas Subject to the Cruising Ordinance Amending Signatures Authorized on l~unicipa1 Court Checking Accounts COVENANT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PURCHASE/SALE AGREH1ENT (Referred 4/6/87) The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of said agreement with Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Earl Clymer -,- ~tdua~rc~h~2~3~.~19~8~7~ ________________ ~R~ean~town~CditDy~C~oyun~c~iLI~td~iwnwu~te~s~ ________________ ~~PAge 102 PUBLIC HEARING Rezone: Ridgeview Annexation Property Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment AUDIENCE COMMENT Advancement to Transportation Committee Report OLD BUSINESS Transportation Committee Lake Washington Boulevard Traffic This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to consider imposition of zoning on property contained within the scope of the Ridgeview Annexation, 16.2S acres located along both sides of SE IOOth Place at the intersection of NE 24th Street. Referring to a vicinity map of the area, Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the existing single family residential area (Brier's Terrace) for which R-I zoning is recommended. G-I, General, zoning is recommended for the remaining undeveloped portion due to uncertainty of development plans. He noted that the G-I zone is used either as a holding zone or for residential development of one dwelling unit on 3S,OOO square foot lots. Councilman Stredicke recalled that during consideration of the annexation, property owners were opposed to any zoning other than R-I, single family residential, classification. Eugene Hoffman, 16922 143rd SE, Renton, annexation petitioner, clarified that his intent has always been to rezone the property to an R-I designation. Betty Davis, 13638 SE IOOth Place, Renton, confirmed that property owners were assured that the annexing property would be zoned R-I. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL INSTRUCT CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO READVERTISE THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 27 TO REFLECT CONSIDERATION OF ONLY R-I, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONING FOR THE TOTAL PROPERTY. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the second public hearing to consider the matter of zoning for two parcels of property annexed to Renton as a result of the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment, approved on 2/4/87. On 2/9/87, the City Council held the first of two required public hearings to consider imposition of L-I, Light Industry, zoning on the northerly parcel (IS acres) containing the Black River Quarry, which is currently used for a rock crushing operation and associated equipment storage and repair; and M-P, Manufacturing Park, zoning on the southerly parcel (98 acres). Referring to a vicinity map of the area, Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the subject site and described prior Council determination that assignment of the L-l zone will allow continuation of the rock crushing operation on the northerly parcel as a legal, non-conforming use, as was its status in Tukwila. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT AREA "A" (NORTH) AS L-l (LIGHT INDUSTRY) ZONE AND AREA "B"(SOUTH) AS M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) ZONE. CARRIED. Patricia Lavery, HOO North 38th Street, Renton, representing Kennydale Community Club, requested advancement to the Transportation Committee report regarding Lake Washington Boulevard traffic. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Committee Chairman Reed presented a report regarding Lake Washington Boulevard traffic. The Committee met with City staff and the residents of the Kennydale area to first discuss the recommendations of the Administration and then hear the citizens' response and further concerns regarding traffic on the Boulevard. The Committee heard testimony from the citizens of the area that the volume of traffic during peak traffic hours is such that traffic entering on Lake Washington Boulevard from side streets must wait a substantial period of time to gain access. This will encourage entering traffic to take unnecessary risks. Additionally, crosswalks exist to assist pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard to gain access to both Kennydale Beach and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Parks. Because of the volume and speed of the traffic, unsafe conditions are created at those crosswalks. Previous efforts by the City to create a safe condition have not been satisfactory and more intense control is necessary. ...... .. (- ZONING SUMMARY RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT Public Hearing -March 23, 1987 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 2~4/87 Ordinance 4040 became effective, annexing certain territory to the City of Renton as per the Renton/Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA). 2/9/87 The first of the two required public hearings was held to consider the imposition of zoning on the two parcels of property transferred from the City of Tukwila as a result of the BLA. L-l Light Industrial zoning was recommended for the northerly parcel composed primarily of the Black River Quarry, which presently contains a rock crushing operation and associated equipment storage and repair (see the attached map). The site was zoned M-I Light Industrial in Tukwila. Council expressed the concern that L-I zoning might not be in the City's long-term best interest and that G-I General Use zoning might be more appropriate. M-P Manufacturing Park zoning was recommended for the southerly parcel which is in conformance with the area-wide Green River Valley rezone and Comprehensive Plan (see the attached map). The matter was tabled in order to allow staff to contact the owners of the northern property. 2116/87 Council was informed that the rock crushing use currently in existence on the Quarry site was a legal non-conforming use under Tukwila's M-I zone, and unless the Renton City Council imposes H-I Heavy Industrial zoning, the Quarry will continue to be a legal non-conforming use in Renton, with either L-I or G-l zoning. Mr. Jim Hawk, a representative of the Black River Quarry requested that H-I zoning be imposed in order to allow the Quarry as a permitted use and to allow any further expansion. Council voted to table the matter for one week. 2123/87 Council removed the matter of the Renton/Tukwila BLA zoning from the table. Council also voted to accept L -I zoning on the northerly portion and M-P zoning on the southerly portion, and to set a date for the second of the two required public hearings. 3123/87 The second of the two required public hearings is held on the zoning of the properties annexed by the BLA. CT:2510G Attachment .' I ~n\~ I re'a1m~ · -~ r I , I , ~--------\~,\;..J AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six . months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Journal-, Daily Record Chronicle....x...-, Daily Globe News __ , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on March 6, 1987 R2120 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21. 52 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 t h day of Ma r 19~. VN #87 Aevl8ed 10184 Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. Public Notice CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the , Renton City Council has fixed the 23rd day of March, 1987, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council : Chambers of the Renton Municipal Build- ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Zoning classifications for properties in- cluded in the Aentonffukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. The northern por- tion includes an existing rock crusher , operation and L-1 Light Industry zoning is \ recommended. The second portion 10- , cated southerly of Longacres is recom- \ mended M-P Manufacturing Park zone I which is consistent with recent areawide , Green River Valley rezone. This ;s the ) second of two required public hearings. . Any and all interested persons are . invited to be present to voice approval, l disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk Published in the Valley 'Daily News March 6,1987. R2120 .. CITY OF RENTON NOT! CE OF PUBLI C HEARl NG BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 23rd day of _____ M~ar~c~h~ ___________ " 19~, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Zoning classifications for properties included in the Renton/ Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. The northern portion includes an existing rock crusher operation and L-1 Light Industry zoning is recommended. The second portion located southerly of Longacres is recommended M-P Manufacturing Park zone which is consistent with recent areawide Green River Valley rezone. This is the second of two required public hearings: Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. DATE OF PUBLICATION: 3/6/87 CITY OF RENTON Max i ne E. Motor Ci ty Clerk I, , 1 .. , \ , \ .. ..,-.. " TIC , " RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON HARCH 23, 1987 -----'AT 8:00 P.M. ,RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS . " 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN THE RENTON/TuKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT ANNEXA TI ON. THE NORTHERN PORT! ON I NCLUDES AN EXISTING ROCK CRUSHER OPERATION AND L-l LIGHT INDUSTRY ZONING IS RECOMMENDED. THE SECOND PORTION LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF LONGACRES IS RECOMMENDED H-R MANUFACTURING PARt ZONE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH RECENT AREAWIDE GREEN RIVER VALLEY REZONE. THIS IS . THE SECOND OF TWO REQUIRED PUBLIC ,. HEARl NGS • ANY AND ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT TO VOICE APP/WYAL 1 ,:' DISAPPROVAL OR OPI N IONS ON. SAME, I " .. Complete legal description (;-further iriformatio71 available in the City Clerk's Office -235-2501 W • I The removal, mutilation, destruction' , , a r n In . or concealment of this notice is ~ mis'; , ' , ;.' ,:;' , , .,', • dlemelano~. ptunls,hable by fine, ,~n~ , " . , ' ': ." mp-: son men • . \./ .' , .. . ,_ .... ---,---":;;:""0-""' ___ ..:.-=-..-..~_ ~.---==------=-_~.~~':..._~ -~,--' -- CERT I F I CATI ON STATE OF WASHI NGTON) , 55. COUNTY OF KING ) I Les/J'e L. PhilllDS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 10 COPIES OF THE ABOVE NOTICE WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE OR11iJRE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED' AND TWO COPIES WERE POSTED AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVENUE S., RENTON, WA ON DATE OF March ~ !?Ill '. . TO B.E~ ME ~~'-. 19 a.,t....j-f--- . : J '. 0lil 0" z (///7 C~JJ/hc~~f-?5 ~/ //~j I-?C/~/~..r4:~ ~-'7kr,?Q,r-W(~:~,;",,; /3QJ./~~7'A'tIj UJ////~//I /J~4r:.,rp~(l'-?, ~//'/n~/?/,i,-(7d . ..%Qc/wp.:tA7a":..;~.C;:Li."":W; P',,{/y/;'p> ,/,?p'dt' c/UJ~/'r;/~;?;// /' L-/ L.iP~;lfi?ksfty .ze'~/P-fJA}c~;";?/f"('~e,\ ~C' J-e-CP4t1 kb;// L(J'c~,t/.r/'l?u;rh~ t7'/ £prQ'~~J.. :ZJ,&c,,#,?~;,«,e,,;~L?;;~i /J7!;/1v!~(Jh"r.lj/'/l'ztr,~. ,. " .. ,,' ... ;1 .. ··i;"'; ·';-';"'.'.:;:: .. 'iii . ~ . 1 . . . , ~ ~' ' I'" I , .; I' " • \~. .Jt 'j , , ,~, .. I .". < ',1 ,. I , ._~,', '... '" '" 1" ,j~, " .. ~~. ",~ ~l,i1liJ'1J.i! ...... ....t':l' .... .Jl.;''''''l~ g ~t/. Vcdj~j #j);UJr/j ,rrl//?J tJ/ p'J(; "7'2 @ til, Y''')~y IlifhuN), /S'ot'JQuthOP ~/7tJ'(/Cl Qw. Vrj/j"y !l/jI!;tvvy F/'cw/ (// ". /10'c.t7 \ . ',. I' . ' t ... ' ~ .. ,~_ .. " .... "; .. iII.I~:.:.1.:.h..:..~~i ~ lU. Y()/Jry J/~Jtl/~y /7f.c I .5(/u7'/ V) ..t/"'6"a:7 @ W V(I/itY}/it/j/.IJClj ?rcwl tll zt, /~t7t7 @W, )h/A,y ~hWPf Fr(l41 (lJ.#:-/67'90 ",,'.':'::,_ .. ',;,'.:.~', _~·)'~,,;~~::iJ.;;l~ tJw. Ya//t.y &j);/(,Io/ /(I(Jr"J.;tdl vI UhP4ckl',(fJyC/ . " '.' .. .." ,;,,', ®f)1"I;(JA, Rei SUJ. 27.5r'SoL/1i (/1 E4/,Q//ce fi M/rtl 7?eO'b("I//./%/?;t.,;;_.~,w:~ f) /11;//.;5),/ A'cJ SUJ IJ/ /!',WI/{(//0e § ~~(7 7/e~iwf'4/ //fo#7 . (g~#sAvh'd sm. 17S.t '/}/;I'/;f til k!/l;Iat! % 4/b~7/e.4kt'dX'A?4A~:,L'~;,;".,.i1j ,." .- ", ' . ' ... ,-l~'-/" > . . " ,;"~' '" ." '. " I' . I . , " . i ~:..~-'-..:._,~_-' .. :J:=::: .. :~. _. '-'... < ;-,--V'"_--C.:"-",O .. :,:_._'_"'_' '_"~.," ~~:. _'" -'-'--___ '_ •.• ="_" "c--'~-"-,----,-..;;;:..:::...-=:.o.,,,,-,=""-'-"-,"",,",,' "-="'.'''''''' ,= ... ..:..' _rr_ .... I i .'. March 2. 1987 Citizen Comment: Igelmond -Lake Washington Boulevard Traffic Citizen Comment: Beckley -Mother-in-Law Apartment Streets: Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance Advancement to Ways and Means Committee RECESS Ways and Means Committee Ordinance #4046 Streets: Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance CONSENT AGENDA Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Ad justment Claim: Hayes, CL-09-87 Rezone: Container Corporation, R-021-86 Renton City Council Minutes Page 76 Darrel Igelmond, 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, presented data regarding Lake Washington Boulevard to demonstrate existence of safety hazards to pedestrians and bicyclists by high speed traffic. He indicated that new apartment development and popularity of two beach parks has contributed to increased traffic volume along that roadway; and a bicycle trail which originates from Bellevue ends north of the 44th Street 1-405 interchange and resumes south of Coulon Beach Park. It was pointed out that the boulevard is impacted by peak hour traffic five hours per day and speeds often exceed 40 mph. Since speed is difficult to control on that section of roadway, Mr. Igelmond felt that stop signs would be one effective deterrent to speeders which could be enforced by the City. He concluded by urging support of safety measures for Lake Washington Boulevard. Edwin Beckley, 3517 NE Sunset Boulevard, Renton, inquired regarding proposed legislation which would allow construction of mother-in-law apartment on existing single family lot without subdividing the lot. Mayor Shinpoch asked Mr. Beckley to discuss the matter with Building Director Ron Nelson. Dan Potoshnik, 3424 NE Sunset Boulevard, Renton, objected to proposed Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance and offered to work with the Committee to address concerns of truckers regarding parking restrictions and penalties. He referenced a letter he submitted on 2/23/87 from neighbors indicating they have no objection to him parking his truck in the neighborhood. It was noted by Council members and Administrative Assistant Parness that Council had spent over a year carefully reviewing the proposed ordinance in a Council working committee in response to citizen complaints, and penalties referenced in the ordinance are the standard maximum limit which can be imposed. City Attorney Warren also advised that trucks may be pulled onto private property such as a parking lot instead of parking on public right-of-way. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:50 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:57 p.m.; roll was called; all members present except Reed, previously excused. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3, Title X (Traffic) of City Code by adding a section regulating the parking of commercial vehicles and vehicles over 12,000 pounds gross vehicle weight, authorizing towing, and declaring criminal penalties. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Discussion was held regarding content of the ordinance, and whether the proposed ordinance regarding excess right-of-way use (see later action on page 78) would be affected by the Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance. It was determined that conflicts will be resolved when the proposed right-of-way policy is put to the test. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. MOTION CARRIED. Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Item 7.c, Planning Commission appointment, was removed at Council request. ICity Clerk requested public hearing be set on 3/23/87 to consider the zoning of the Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment properties (second of two . required hearings). Council concur. Claim for damages in the amount of $1,681.41 filed by Steven Hayes, 16414 104th Avenue NE, Bothell, for repairs to his vehicle resulting from an accident allegedly caused by City vehicle (1/28/87). Refer to City Attornev and insurance service. Hearing Examiner recommended approval of rezone of approximately 42 acres of property located on the west side of Monster Road SWat the 600- 1100 block to M-P, Manufacturing Park, for Container Corporation of America, File No. R-021-86. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. , February 23. 1987 Community Services Committee Streets: Excess Right-of- Way Use Policy Transportation Carom ittee Streets: South 26th Street C-Curb Sign Code A WC: Net, Computerized Information System Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Renton City Council Minute. Page 68 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. Responding to objection by Councilman Stredicke to proposed position upgrade, Councilwoman Mathews explained that a Personnel Department audit of the position performed after the Storm Drainage Utility was approved at budget time indicated need for upgrade. MOTION CARRIED. Community Services Chairman Mathews presented a report recommending Council concur in the draft Excess Right-of-Way Use Policy as amended and corresponding ordinance with minor revisions as recommended by the Administration with referral to the Ways and Means Committee to prepare the proper legislation. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Chairman Mathews explained that the excess right-of -way has previously been available for organizations, businesses and private residences to lease from the City. However, in response to State law, the City must charge the value of the property. The new policy encourages vacation of land no longer needed by the City; requires City Council approval of bus shelters in the downtown area; establishes fees; provides for waiver of fees when the public is directly served; incorporates a leasehold excise tax; and provides for appeals of decisions to the Hearing Examiner. Administrative Assistant Parness added that the purpose of the ,policy, which is actually less restrictive than the existing ordinance, is to allow the Board of Public Works flexibility to reward property owners who are providing public benefit through use of public right-of-way. MOTION CARRIED. Transportation Committee Chairman Reed presented a report regarding the request to close South 26th Street at Benson Road to discourage traffic through the Victoria Hills Subdivision. The Committee met with the Victoria Hills Homeowners Association to review the operation and effectiveness of traffic diverters installed on South 26th Street between Benson Road South and SR-SIS. It was agreed that while the diverters had helped to slow traffic, they had not reduced the number of vehicles using South 26th Street as a shortcut. Therefore, the Committee concurred with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to install a C-curb on Benson Road South at South 26th Street to prohibit left turns onto South 26th Street. Upon development of the second phase of the Victoria Hills PUD, the developer would be required to install additional traffic controls, channelization and widening to provide for left turn movements out of South 26th Street to the north. Finally, the diverters will be removed after the C-curb is installed and tested for effectiveness. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke cited possible Sign Code violations at NE 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard NE in the Highlands, and requested enforcement action by the City. Responding to inquiry by Councilwoman Keolker, Administrative Assistant Parness reported that the A WC-Net (State Legislature information system) will be implemented in one week. Council will be notified when it is available for use. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REMOVE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT ZONING FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY , CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEPT L-I ZONING FOR THE BLACK RIVER QUARRY (northerly parcel). For the record, City Attorney Warren advised that because this is a joint annexation and rezone, there will be another public hearing on the rezone issue. Council discussion was held regarding appropriate zoning for the northerly parcel, either L-l, Light Industry, or G-l, General, a holding zone. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: MATHEWS, KEOLKER, HUGHES, CLYMER. 3 NAYS: TRIMM, REED, STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Ways and Means Committee Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: February 16. 1987 Vacation: VAC-007-85, Park/Garden A venue N., Brown/Wong Claim: Universal Land Construction Company, CL-07-87 Police Department: Dance Hall Ordinance OLD BUSINESS Rezone: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Utilities Committee Release of Easement: Henderson Homes, Summer wind Division I, RE-05-86 \~ Renton City Council Minutes , Page 61 City Clerk requested acceptance of appraisal payment in the amount of $14,868.\0 for Brown/Wong Alley Vacation, VAC-007-85, located at Park Avenue N., Garden Avenue N., N. 6th Street and N. 7th Street (vacated). Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Claim for damages in the amount of $1,191.49 filed by Universal Land Construction Company, P.O. Box 329, Woodinville, WA 98072, for repair of conduit allegedly damaged by Water Department staff installing water services at Marina Landing Apartments (08/04/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Police Department requested ordinance regulating public dances and public dance halls. Refer to Public Safety Committee. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REMOVE THE MATTER OF RENTON-TUKWILA ANNEXATION ZONING FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. (Matter tabled on 2/9/87 to allow staff to contact owner of northerly property.) Mayor Shinpoch explained that Policy Development Director Larry Springer had contacted the property owner who expressed preference for H-I, Heavy Industry, zoning; however, Mr. Springer's recommendation was either L-I, Light Industry, or G-I, General, classification, for the property. The tabled motion was repeated: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Reed, Council accept the proposed rezone with the exception that the northerly parcel be designated G-I, General, and the subject matter be referred back to the Policy Development Department to set second public hearing. Roll call: 3 Ayes: Trimm, Reed, Stredicke. 3 Nays: Keolker, Hughes, Clymer. Motion failed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL TABLE THIS SUBJECT MATTER FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report regarding the Summerwind Division I easement release request (referred 11/17/86). The subject easement was constructed and given to the City by a private developer upon extension of a watermain from Duvall Avenue NE. The property containing the easement was purchased and platted by Henderson Homes for the Summerwind Division I residential plat, and during construction, the easement was relocated within the plat at the developer's expense. Since City funds have not been expended to either move or maintain the easement, the Utilities Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Board of Public Works to approve the easement release and classify it as Class B, requiring no compensation other than payment of the filing fee. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: No report NEW BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Meeting Schedule Streets: Union Avenue NE Parking PSCOG: Regional Airport System Plan ADJOURNMENT Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 2/16/87 Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke requested that the Administration develop a Committee schedule to review pending referrals, including meeting with the Planning Commission. Councilman Stredicke asked the Administration to investigate whether on- street parking should be prohibited on Union Avenue NE between NE 10th and NE 11th Street, in view of numerous accidents involving parked cars. Councilwoman Keolker announced that the first of four public hearings on the Regional Airport System Plan will be held by PSCOG on Tuesday, February 17 in the Renton Council Chambers. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:14 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk /. .' OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z () ~ q, ~ b" o «-'9..,~ fO«; /;0 SEP'<',.r< BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: TO: FROM: ~ SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM February 16, I 9B7 Barbara Shinpoch. Mayor Renton City Council Members Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Zoning of the Black River Quarry RECEIVED FEB 1 6 1987 CITY OF REI'i ION CIT'! COUNCIL· The northern parcel of land acquired by the City of Renton in the boundary line adjustment (see the attached map) is primarily owned by the Black River Quarry of Seattle. The area is currently in use as a rock crushing operation. Upon the annexation of this parcel, the Policy Development Department recommended that L-I, Light Industrial, zoning be imposed to correspond with its prior zoning in Tukwila of M-I, Light Industrial. At the February 9, 19B7, City Council meeting, the Council expressed the concern that L-I zoning might not be in the City's long-term best interest and that G-I zoning might be more appropriate. Since the Council meeting, the Policy Development staff has contacted the Tukwila Planning Department to varify the permitted uses in their M-l zone. M-I uses can be summarized as "non-nuisance" activities in terms of air, and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare and odor. Uses such as 'rotkcrushing, asphalt or concrete batching or mixing, as are conducted at Black River Quarry, are not permitted in Tukwila's M-I zone, but are allowed outright in their M-2 Heavy'Industrial zone. Therefore, the use currently in existence on' the Quarry site was a legal non-conforming use under Tukwila's M-I zone, and unless the RePlton City Council imposes H-I Heavy Industrial zoning, the Quarry will continue to be a legal non-conforming use in Renton, with either L-I or G-I zoning. When the question of zoning arose at previous public meetings on the . .boundary line adjustment, the answer was that each City Council, would determine the appropriate zoning category to be imposed""on the parcels acquired in the adjustment. Therefore, if the Council "would rather advertise G-l as opposed to L-l zoning for the second public hearing, they are able to do so. Barbara Shinpoct. ,ayor Renton City Council Members February 13. 1987 Page 2 However. Mr. Jim Hawk. a representative of the Black River Quarry. has been notified of this zoning issue. and he is very concerned as to the Quarry's ability to expand operations should it continue as a legal non-conforming use. Mr. Hawk has indicated that. while the excavation operations at the Black River site may be nearing completion. it is the Quarry's intention to expand its operation in the future to include other related heavy industrial activities. He has requested that H-I zoning be imposed in order to allow the Quarry as a permitted use and to allow any future expansion. LMS:CT:24S0G Attachment "'-,r-e, ____________ _ ,-- \ I --------_.1_ I '( II, -(1/ 1/' t / .. ' /;/ I \ -----i I \' \ \ \ ~\-----";:::------H,,---- \ ~-----, '---I ---------r ---'\ \ \ \ MET R f \\ J +? ---------------\C ISPOS L \ \ ! ".J. , I ; ! ! I ! I i I 5P1D[R STAGING ~.I\I· 13 I!O AI.. n.'. T.l JS TECHNltl\l R£<;,EAR(.H (.0, 27 / PT." DC. Tot. I -0 , , -, --, " ' 8 \ II IV f\c.. 7 • I I , s: 0 1 f.t ~, ::1i i , I u I 'J I ) / CllllA(,( Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Howard A. Strong Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Puget Power Building Bellevue, W A 98009 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Mr. Strong: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 ~Fie Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Tukwila City Council 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Council Members: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiIed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Hank O'Claire Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau 200 I Western A venue Seattle, WA 98104 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Mr. O'Claire: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Pacific Northwest Bell General Accountant Tax & Regulatory Matters 1600 7th Avenue, Room 2307 Seattle, W A 98191 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Sir: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 ~Fie Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Marjorie Wickham Area Manager, Community Affairs & Service Pacific Northwest Bell 300 SW 7th, Room 145 Renton, W A 98055 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Ms. Wickham: Enclosed is a cOpy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 John KlaselJ Washington State Department of Transportation 6431 Corson Avenue South Seattle, W A 98198 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Mr. KlaselJ: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was reCiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 ~~ Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor February 12, 1987 Lon Hurd 3-H Management & Consultants 4517 California SW Seattle, WA 98116 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 (Revised), Renton Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Mr. Hurd: Enclosed is a copy of the referenced ordinance, which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number denoted on the front of the document. This ordinance was refiled due to correction in the legal description. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2501 , " ..... February 9. 1987 Bezope· Rentop-Tukwila cBOl,Jodary Ad i!!Hrnent Renton City Council Minutes Page 50 that signatures on the petition constitute 75.67% of the assessed valuation, and indicated the purpose of the annexation to allow connection of properties currently experiencing sePtic tank failure to City sewer service. Mr. Springer advised that the original scope of the annexation was reduced in order to gather the required number of signatures in areas supporting the proposal. He also noted the possibility that areas to the north would desire annexation in the future. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Springer confirmed that only one-half of the right-of -way of 106th Street is included in the annexation; and in accordance with Council policy, connection to sewers will not be allowed unless properties first annex to the City. Audience comment was invited. Carol Halvorson, 12803 SE 102nd Street, Renton, and Mike Anderson, 10318 129th Avenue SE, supported approval of the annexation. At Council request, Mr. Springer designated the location of the property owned by the Stilwill family (13052 SE 102nd) which was not included in the annexation since owners of adjacent property were opposed to the proposal. Mr. and Mrs. Stilwill had requested sewer connection on 7!7 /86, due to septic failure and were awaiting circulation of an annexation petition. In response to Council suggestion that properties on the south side of 102nd be included in the current annexation instead of waiting until septic problems occur, Mr. Springer cautioned that increasing the scope of the annexation may result in inability to achieve required 75% participation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE ANNEXATION, IMPOSE THE STIPULATIONS OF ZONING, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION, AND PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; AND REFER THIS MA ITER TO POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. Noting that some of the residents in the annexation formerly participated in a community council, Councilman Stredicke questioned authority of such councils. City Attorney Warren indicated that while community councils have no legal authority, they can effectively galvanize individual property owners towards a common goal. , This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the first of two required public hearings to consider the imposition of zoning on two parcels of property transferred from the City of Tukwila as a result of the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment annexation, effective on 2/4/87. Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the two parcels on a vicinity map of the area. He advised that Light industrial, L-I, classification is recommended for the northerly parcel composed principally of the Black River Quarry (Area A), which presently contains a rock crusher operation and associated equipment storage and repair. That site is presently zoned M-I or Light Industrial in the City of Tukwila. Manufacturing Park, M-P, classification is recommended for the second parcel located south of Longacres Race Track (Area B), in conformance with the area-wide Green River Valley Rezone and the Comprehensive Plan. At Council request, Mr. Springer agreed to investigate the life expectancy of the rock quarry use to determine whether L-I zoning is appropriate in the future. He noted that alternative zoning such as Office Park Or Manufacturing Park would be much more restrictive on the site. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Discussion was held regarding the appropriateness of imposing G-I zoning on the northerly parcel and requiring the property owner to apply for a rezone to a higher density. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE PROPOSED REZONE WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE NORTHERLY PARCEL BE DESIGNATED G-I, GENERAL, AND THE SUBJECT MA ITER BE REFERRED BACK TO THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO SET SECOND PUBLIC HEARING.· Speaking against the motion, Councilman Clymer questioned zoning change since property owners may have been led to believe that existing zoning would be retained February 9. 1987 AUDIENCE COMMENT Citizen Comment: Larson -Police Patrol of Philip Arnold Park Citizen Comment: Larson -Library Services Citizen Comment: Peterson -Lake Washington Boulvard Traffic CONSENT AGENDA Dangerous Building: Shepp. Case #D-143 Claim: Gebinini. CL-05-87 Loop: Anti-Cruising Ordinance Loop: Curfew Ordinance Airport: Bird Population CAG: 052-86. Renton Hill AJlei Sewer Replacement and S. 5th Street Paving (S-402) CORRESPONDENCE Latecomer Agreement: Shohen Limited Partnership for Sewer. Storm Drain. Roadway Improvements Renton City Council Minutes Page 51 ~pon annexation to the City. *MOVED BY MATHEWS. SECONDED BY CLYMER. COUNCIL TABLE THE MOTION FOR ONE WEEK TO ALLOW OPPORTUNITY TO CONTACT PROPERTY OWNERS INVOLVED. CARRIED. . Ruth Larson. 714 High Avenue South. Renton. President of Renton Hill Community Association. requested improved police response to calls reporting disturbances at Philip Arnold Park by teens on weekend nights. and Questioned whether the park could be secured during those times. MOVED BY STREDICKE. SECONDED BY KEOLKER. THAT THE ADMINISTRATION BE CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEE WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT MRS. LARSON'S IDENTIFIED PROBLEM. CARRIED. On another matter. Mrs. Larson reported that Renton students have been deprived of valuable services offered by the Renton Library for half of a school year while the facility has been remodeled. Mayor Shinpoch explained delays have resulted from inclement weather and unanticipated need to remove asbestos material. but the Library should reopen sometime between March 3 and April 3, the date scheduled for the opening ceremony. Norm Peterson, 4402 Park A venue North. Renton, inquired about the Lake Washington Boulevard traffic complaint. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that the matter would be discussed at the Transportation Committee meeting on February 17th. Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Building & Zoning Department requested appropriation in the amount of 52,594.00 to demolish dangerous building per Hearing Examiner order of 10/10/87 (Case #D-143); building owned by Barbara Shepp is located at 223 Garden Avenue North. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim for damages in the amount of 5480.85 filed by Louie Gebinini. 676 Sunset Boulevard NE. Renton. for damage to vehicle allegedly caused by hitting hole on Shattuck Avenue at Burnett Avenue S. (11/3/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Police Department requested review of anti-cruising ordinance to alleviate cruising problems in the downtown Loop area. Refer to Pub!jc Safety Committee. Police Department requested review of curfew ordinance to assist in controlling Loop and loitering problems on weekends in the downtown area. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Public Works/Airport Department requested review of mitigation measures to reduce bird population in the vicinity of Renton Municipal Airport and Seaplane Base; contributing factor is siltation delta area at mouth of Cedar River. Refer to Transportation (Avjation) Committee. Public Works/Utility Engineering Department submitted CAG-052-86 (S-402). Renton Hill Alley Sewer Replacement and S. 5th Street Paving; and requested approval of the project. authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of 51,702.65, commencement of 30-day lien period. and release of retained amount of 52.673.79 to contractor, Samish Construction. Inc .• if all required releases are received. Council concur. MOVED BY TRIMM. SECONDED BY CLYMER. COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Letter was read from Rich Henderson. General Partner of Shohen Limited Partnership. 1420 Maple Avenue SW. Suite 201. Renton. requesting latecomer agreement so that adjacent properties will be required to share in costs of sanitary sewer. storm drainage system, curbs. gutters. and sidewalks, street lighting, and asphalt paving installed to serve the Shohen Limited Partnership development located at 1420 Maple Avenue SW. Renton. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE. COUNCIL REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. " THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOR, February 10, 1987 Office of the Clerk of the Council Room 403, King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton -Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Dear Sirs: Enclosed are seven certified copies of Ordinance Number 4040 which was refiled with King County Records and Elections under the receiving numbers shown on the documents. Boundary Review Board letter attached. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/gn Enclosures OffiCE ~F 11lE CRY ClFRK RUHUlI MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 1«llL m. so. REII10H, WA _ 87/'02/10 REeD F Ct=lSHSL ).4, DO ***1·'l.00 CI TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON :';J, tc' -;;' c-;; -<. Cl ORDINANCE NO. . 4040 f~~~~~ .= AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTOt:.j:;:·~~· 0 ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENtON 'c. ., WASHINGTON (RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUST':1EN'J;.('~~~ :::-: ." "; (-.' WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35.10. 217 a~}:j-;\ RCW 35A.14.300, the legislative body, by majority.:vote, elected to annex certain territory outside its City Limit's as hereinbelow more particularly described, ·for muriicipal purposes; and WHEREAS the City Council fixed January 5, 1987 as. a time and place for a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington; and WHEREAS pursuant to said Notice, a public hearing has been held at the time and place specified in the aforesaid notice and the Council having duly considered all matters and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable have been duly complied with; and WHEREAS a proper "Notice of Intention" . having been filed with the King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and deemed approved as per their letters. of. November 11 and November 18, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The aforesaid findings, recitals and ,n determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects; all requirements of the law in regard to the annexation as per RCW 35A.14.300 have been fully complied with. -1- ORDINANCE NO. 4040 It is further determined that the below described property is being annexed into the City of Renton for municipal purposes and such annexation to be effective after the approval, passage and publication of this Ordinance and on 12:01 A.M. on February 4, 1987 and on and after said date said property shall be and constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; said property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and publication and on 12:01 A.M. on February 4, 1987. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. SECTION III: The above described annexed property contiguous to Precinct Nos. 11-95 of the City of Renton shall be and APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Barbara Y. hinpoch; Mayor ·Lawrence J. Warr Attorney Date of Publication: January 23, 1987 -2- v EXHIBIT A ~~QINANCE NO. 4040 LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FROM RENTON The'lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown In Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 2B 3.B5 7 MOe 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 3B 1.B4 0.91 B MOe (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.B4 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 Moe 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.0l 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 B.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.B3 43 0.10 37 0.17 3B 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 . 0.19 59 0.15 B 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 5.54 36 3.09 TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown In Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2:5, Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2:5, Rge. 4 4 2:5.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2:5, Rge. 4 42 16.0:5 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2:5, Rge. 4· 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 2:5, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11. 79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0:520 . .28 0))0 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 EXHIBIT I ORDINANCE NO. 4040 Renton-Tukwifa Boundlry Adjustment Map of Affected Artas Lands to Renton ...... ',' ~ to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila H o 3000' Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton P"vlew . ORDINANCE NO. 4040 ')11 Future Annexation Petltlol . EXHIBIT A .,., . - I, ---" . " \. 1/ .... '7'--- / .. . r, •• r\......,1 IIW''''''' I ( LANDS TO TUKWILA ("S0UTHERh I That portion or Section 25 Ind 36, Township 2' North, Ringe' Elst, W.N., King County, Washington more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the Plat of BurlIngton , I, Northern Industrial Park Renton 11 as recorded in Volume III of Plats, pages 42- 44, Records of. King County, Washington and the South line of Government Lot 6 situate in the Southwest 1/4 or Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 Eastj Thence West along said South line, said line also being the existing limits of the City or Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1764 (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) to the westerly bank of the Green River (White River)j Thence Southerly along said westerly benk and exist1ng sa1d City limits to the North line of the Northwest 1/4 or Section '6j Thence continuing Southerly along said westerly bank and said city limits to the westerly extent10n of the North boundary 11ne of the Henry Adams Donation Claim ~o. 43j Thence East along ~aid North boundary line and its westerly extension and said city limits to the centerline of Secondary State Highway Number 5Hj Thence South along said centerline and said city limits to the Westerly extension ot a line lying parallel with and )0.0 teet Southerly ot the centerline of S.W. 4Jrd Street (South l80th·)j Thence East along said Southerly 11ne and its westerly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the southerly extention of the Easterly Right-ot-way Line of the Burlington Northern Rallraod (former Northern Pacific RailwaY)j Thence North along said Easterly line and its southerly extension to·an intersection with the South line of the southwesfl/4 of Section 25j Thence continuing North along said East line to its intersection with the South line of Government Lot 6 and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 T.F.9-2 fj5' ~ I;;; ,-'" r: \'.n ;;> If)) ! Ki lb .Y.; L~ /! 1'./ !i: 10 J u ~ ~ ~p I? 1985 .::.'.1 CITY OF TUKWILA Pro!>. Soundary Adjust/Renton . ~ .•• -!~ .• -~ ... ; That portion of Section follows: T23N, R4E, W.M., described as Commencing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Valley Highway (Formerly known as Secondary State Highway No.5-M) and the'north line of the south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4'of said Section 25; thence easterly along said north line,660 feet more or less to the easter~y margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing along said north line 510 feet more or less to the east line of said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the n6rtheast 1/4 of said Section 25, 1320 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along satd east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said north- west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 25, 542.81 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad; ,thence northerly along said easterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING • . , " . '.' ' SUGGESTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (From City of Renton to City 01' Tukwi.la -North Part) All that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance 1J0. 1764 lyin9 Ilesterly of the east margin of BURR Company (N.P. f\y') main track right of way all being located in ti,e Si of thE! 111011 of Section 24, To,mshi~ 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together ~/ith all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BIIRR Company (II.P. f\y') main track right of way all being located in the S,Ii of Section 24, TOllnship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. . Together with all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BURR Company (II.P. Ry) Inain track right of Itay all being located in the NW! of Section 25, To~mship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.H. King County, Washington 9/16/86:JRB I , , .... .,_ ... ~, " " ( LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") G FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACI( RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M., als~ within that. portion of JLlnction Addition to Seattle in Volume l~ of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more par~icularly as follows: " .' 8eginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 821, page 263, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly ,extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (Also known as S. 139thStreet) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said extension to the northeasterly margin of the 8urlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less to the centerline of 8eacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence southeasterly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to the centerlin~ of 69th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road, County Rd.No. 8, and Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said centerline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the 8lack River; thence westerly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad right-of-way margin; thence northwesterly along said north- easterly margin 500 feet more or less to its intersection with the southwesterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence along,a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly Pacific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. , , ( TO: cc: I ~ T E R 0 F F ICE . M E M 0 Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Mayor Shinpobh Larry Springer, Policy Development Richard Houghton, Public Works DATE: 2/10/87 FROM: Maxine MO~~ SUBJECT: Ordinanbe No. 4040 Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment In accordance with your memo of February 6, The Boundary Review Board advised they would accept the City's annexation ordinance with the legal attached as previously approved by them. Dick Houghton furnished verified legal description and the ordinance was re-recorded with King County Auditor this morning. Certified copies were re-delivered to King County Council, Boundary Review Board and will be distributed to all regular recipients. , ,/ .. ~.,--- /--( I ~tlDS TO TUKWILA ("SOUTHERh J That portion Dr Section 25 Ind )6, Township 2) North, Ringe. East, •• M., King County, washington more particularly described as rollows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the Plat of Burlington /1 I Northern Industrial Park Renton II as recorded in Volume III of Plats, pages 42- 44, Records of King County, Washington and the South line of Covernment Lot 6 situate in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, T~wnship 2) North, Range 4 East; Thence west along said South line, said 11ne al~o being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1764 (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) to the Westerly bank of the Creen River (White River); Thence Southerly along said Westerly bank and existing said City limits to the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section )6; Thence continuing Southerly along said Westerly bank and said city limits to the Westerly extention of the North boundary line Dr the Henry Adams Oonation Claim ~o. 4)i Thence East along said North boundary line and its westerly extension and said city limits to the centerline of Secondary State Highway Number 5M; Thence South along said centerline and said city limits to the westerly extension,of a line lying parallel with and )0.0 feet Southerly of the centerline of S.W. 4)rd street (South IBOthli Thence East along said Southerly line and its westerly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the southerly extention of the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Burlington Northern Railraod (former Northern Pacific RaUway); Thence North along said Easterly line and its southerly extension to'an intersection with the South line of the southwesfl/4 of Section 25; Thence continuing North along said East line to its intersection with the South line of Government Lot 6 and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 T.F.9-2 CITY OF TUKl-1ILA Prop. Boundary Adjust/Renton . ~ ... ,: .... '. That portion of Section follows: T23N, R4E, W.M., described as Commencing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Valley Highway (Formerly known as Secondary State Highway No.5-M) and the north line of the south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4'of said Section 25; thence easterly along said north line,660 feet more or less to the easter~y margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing along said north line 510 feet more or less to the east line of said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section :5, 1321) feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along satd east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said north- west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 25, 542.91 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific ~:ai I road; . thence norther 1 'f along sai d easterl y marg into the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. , I I @ fE ~ r;. H.7 r;; rr::-.r I i\ ( {G t l li:_, ",-,---,-I II __ SUGGESTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (From City of Renton to City of Tuhli.1a -North Part) All that portion of the City of Renton as annexed Ily City Ordinance 110. 1764 1yill9 \lester1y of the east margin of BIIRR Company (N.P. R,t) main track right of way all being located in tI,e S! of the IJWi of Section 24, To.mshi~ 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together ~Iith all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying \;esterly of the east margin of BIJRR Company (IJ.P. R,t) main track right of way all being located in the S~H of Section 24, TOllnship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together with all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BIIRR Company (f1.P. R,t) main track right of \;ay all being located in the NW! of Section 25, To~mship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.H. King County, Washington 9/16/86:JRB I , ( L )S TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACK RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M., als~ within that portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Volume 1""2 of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more particularly as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 821, page 263, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (Also known as S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said eHtension to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less G to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence sOLlthe<>.sterly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to tl"",e centerlin~ of 68th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road, County Rd.No. 8, and Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said centerline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the Black River; thence westerly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaulcee, and St. Paul Railroad right-ai-way margin; thence northwesterly along said north- easterly margin 500 feet mare or less to its intersection with the sOLlthwester 1 y margi n of the BLlrl i ngto'n Northern ~:ai 1 rO<'.d (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence along.a line at right angles ta said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly Pacific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. r? IT\' "." \ \ '\ \.. . -I. I' . I , , · .. \, CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys February 6, 1987 TO: Maxine E_ Motor, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Boundary Line Adjustment with Tukwila Dear Maxine: You forwarded me a copy of a letter from Rex Knight, King County Department of Public Works to Gerald A. Peterson, probably of the Boundary Review Board. The letter indicates that Renton's legal description is inappropriate. I note that on the second page of the letter it indicates that four legal descriptions have.beenapproved but are not part of the Ordinance. I would suggest that Public Works obtain those four legal descriptions and utilize them so as to remove any future conflict. It would appear to me that the legal descriptions were attached to the information that you forwarded to me. Public Works should attach the appropriate legal descriptions to the Ordinance. Someone should call the Boundary Review Board and see if it .is necessary for the Council to reaffirm the Ordinance with the appropriate legal. descriptions. We could make the City Council's action effective back to the original date of annexation. It will be necessary to refile the amended Ordinance. LJW:nd cc: Mayor Post Office Box 626 -100 S 2nd Street -Renton, Washington 98057 -(206) 255-8678 OF BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON -DIRECTOR ~ ~ ~ '0' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 '<> 0-9. ~'<- "I7'ED SEP1~~<O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 9, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Due to the change of boundary lines between Tukwila and Renton, the following address is now in the Renton city limits and has been changed to: OLD NEW 6808 S. 140th Street This is the address of Black River Quarry. Sincerely, ?)?tr//~ c-4~~~ ~~mes C. Hanson .~/"Assistant Building Director JCH:p1p 540 Monster Road S.W. • , , ~ • .:J. . ,~ CITY OF RENTON NOT I CE OF PUBLI C HEARl NG BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton Ci ty Council has fixed the 9th day of __ ~F=eb~r~u=a=r~y~ __________ • 19~. at 8:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Zoning classifications for properties included in the Renton/Tukwila . . Boundary Adjustment Annexation. The northern portion includes an existing rock crusher operation and L-l Light Industry zoning is recommended. The second portion located southerly of Longacres is recommended M-P Manufacturing Park zone which is consistent with recent areawide Green River Valley rezone. " Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval. disapproval or opinions on same. DATE OF PUBLICATION: 1/25/87 CITY OF RENTON ~t?m~ Maxine E. Motor City Clerk ' .. .; , ;. ,'. . 'I' ." ' ., RENTON CITY COUNCIL :': '.1'1" ,I ';: • '" j I ~--.~. ~'i : . , , ! : ,I I, PUBLIC HEARIN I I: i . !:i '1::1 f: :!':::ii<::il, i ON __ F_~.,...I B_R_U_A_R_Y_' ",,~_, _1_9_8_7__ A r -8: ~O P, Mi ' Ii :,:,[1-1;11' I :; ';r· : ~l ; ,,!,:~'\::~'f!:i:,,:'::~:1'! r iii" I, ':. ";;":! 1: . "r RENTON MUNI~IPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMB~RSj I " 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • :' ".;, J STATE OF WASH;! NGTON) SiS. COUNTY OF KI NG ) , 1 .J,I, '::"1 r: );', ',I: i :1' ~ . . i ' 'j " ,,01;. ",! ) I r J ' : " I ' ,:':! . i.: :!::I' ~~'ii J :1) ZoNING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR: PROPERTIES. INcLWDEp'!il I ~ THE RENTON!fUKW I LA BOUN~ARY ADJUiqMENTii·/ f',ill A~NEXATI ON, THE NORTHERN ~ORTI ON I NCLUDEF iAN,:;1 . iiii: EflSTING ROCK CRUSHER OPERATION AND. L-1 L}GHT, i',,:!!,! I INDUSTRY ZONING IS. RECOM~ENDED, THE SECOND':'I'!I, , PORTI ON LOCATED S?UTHE~L Y OF LOt'IGACRE~; IS,: ';;:::"~ i r RECOMMENDED M-P JVIANU~ACTUR I NG, PARK tONE ; <:;;:';;'1:'1: LONGACRES WHICH IS CON~fSTENT WITH REC~NLA~.fAWI:D~il>i!i:"; GREEN RIVE~i 'ALL~YREZONE,! ,,:;1.' 11):::"! .. :: " '~'L:;. \::!';·<!:"~:>.'!I1' I I , 1 ',. \ 'I' I,,! I " ; I 1,(',' !,! " ANY AND ALL I NTERESTED~~~SbN$:i -flRf!,"lli! INVITED TO BE ~RESENT TO~OIC~i,AP~:R,q.YA~UII DISAPPROVAL OR OPINIONS ;ONStME:, ,1,'::11, '; ': " :;, :i:.:] !~',1 ';',;;,<:,',;/.;1~,::1,lj' , , . ; d' J 1 1 , I' "I'" '1,,:.1" , .' I I' ' J. ; ; ." I! .:: '; ~; I I ' OJ,) , '1 1', ': ,.,1:: :;\!: ," I ;,: . "",.,: :'i!.i I' , :1: : ": : ,,' ,:'l.; (::'; :}:i') :.~., .. " .. _~ __ ;_._ .. _'-::. ....... , .. _. :.' .iL: __ ~ ~ ;._l~~~ii,.~~~~jU:!j . , , , f CERTI F I CATI ON I L e.sl i e. L Ph'lll ~S HEREBY CERTI FY THAT /0 COP I ES OF THE ABOVE NOTI CE WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE OR MiRE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND TWO COPIES E POSTE THE RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING. 200 MILL AVENUE S •• RENTON, WA ON DATE 0 ~. SIGN~~~?£ , ~ .. - • ,--. ' ... Public. Hea.ring ,:"",,:, Fe. b r UQ r 'd q. J987, '"~,.F,,, _",;"" ,,_, I; "_""""' _"::.;~: .. .::.t"':;l Z oni"J C J0551-f jc a. l-/on.5 For Pr(1pet~j e,s ..Inc.Juded R-enron/ , , ' Ivrwi)Q. /h:JJJJ~+ment AnI'Je}(or,,(,#. Nor7h f6rlian..IncI4lde,J"p~ ~.orTli"" 'I<(/c)( CnNJrl' Of'er,I/;'d~ L../ t.;,-I/.7~~tJ'7~)'7J"#?';'I'..7J~~C(7~~ rht Se.CdHr7 ~d'()~.T.r J"/.I?/h,~ t:7/ /-"-p~c"'~J".k A'~c"-"?~~~:~~.: ... ,,:, , ,.,y.,P "%"tlIvC~(/I'/r ~I'; ~tit?~. ,<,., " ' .;. '; "'i '," ':, \' ,', "', ' 'J'. '<:>:._.!-:_~~;.:<. ~r.LL-=-:"L,~.,_~:;.~,:~~1~~j~L~..JS]h L tJ(;Qtp~ ,/ hJ;t;/p'J.t/tvA" -P;'~(I~ 2.~/l't?" ",' . 'i ' ': ,'. _, ••• , • '.;.:, J ~:'-'.~~~ • ~. (.., ';'. ,: ~~_ \~,:~ ":'~:i"~"·:~·t~~~~Jr;..w~_~~i; (j) W. ValIer ffiiv~y Fr<!~/ 171 ~ 3' P'c ~ ()).YQ)}e)'lhl.UJy FroHf 01 :tI::J~OO i , ~ '. .~ !. -1. ~ W. VoJ}~, MWAly /6t1r' So: t7/~ /7daJ f}ttJ. ~/k)'#;iu<?y rl'ddll//--/?av ~w. VQ 110/ J/jIu7y /?5:t'..h. 1// d /~~t70 @ttI. P'Q&" #$'7' no//,1 d'/ #' /6' ~t7 fjll/. YQlHy #tIVIIY /V'I?l'" JP. 17/ Jfr~~r lilvd'. ' , ~ MOM}':! Rd..s.w. 2Zt' So.dt En"lrrMee;b t'l\e-t/"O Treatment PI4rrT"." ,,;,!_~< .. ~ , fr/4dJftl /?P JW. IN fnf!tJ/}(;~ ]Q Metro Treatf7l~nt planT ~ MOI)Jn, RJ.S.w.' /7~l N. 01 Enff'OJ?t:,e'}q Metro .Tl'eatmenT,P)Q"t'"i .• ~" ;: : ..... ', ." ~ . ,,' " ". }" . . '. ' . , " , ! " .. , ~,.,,: ·,t .. ;. Ii"'",' .',(,.'. ~ ;,:,",: ':".i ,.,\~",,~,"<>·\,,:.,,'lj"":~"'_M~ ",id ,','.<., , .. ' ,' . .L"~"-~;< . I i , , .. ,;,,~',~ '" '". .:., '" . , .. '. . . .' , '" P •• ,,; ',_" .,~,."';''''''''~''''\,:",,"~,,,'' ,,"'; , , ' ,-, •• , ,.,' '.' ....... ,1 . ",.. , ,. , . . . '. .,' I ' ,:. ~",' ~, ',;,~t,' ,'L;k,~:.~ \!,;";;4~~ I' I' ,."".1.: ..... , ,~.r,-.I~ ... ;".,,~""'._,;; ... · .• d!, l\TTACHME~ F LANDS TO TUKWILA ("NORTHERN") That portion of Sections 24 and 25, Township 2' North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Westerly Right-of-Way Line of Monster Road S.W. (Steele Hili Road -Survey 24-2'-4-1, Estabiished 5-25-31, County Road No.8) said Right-of-Way being 60 feet in width ('0 feet each sid of centerline) with the Northerly RIght-of-Way LIne of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line in Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24; Thence Northwesterly along said railroad Ri9ht-of-way LIne, saId line also beIng the existIng lImIts of the City of Renton as a~nexed by Ordinance No. 1764 (amended by OrdInance NO. 1928) a dIstance of 280 feet more or less to a poInt whIch Is perpendIcular to and Easterly of the existIng Northeasterly line of the Tukwila CIty Limits as annexed under Ordinance NO~ 252; Thence Southwesterly along said perpendicular line and said Renton City limits line to t~e Southwesterly Right-of-Way Line of the former Northern PacIfic RaIlway and the True Point of BegInnIng; Thence Southeasterly along said southwesterly raIlroad right-of-way line and said city limits line to an intersection with the easterly extension of that portion of the trrread of the Green River, which bears generally westerly and which point is also 1900 feet more or less south and 850 feet more or less < east of the northwest corner of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence westerly along said extension 100 feet more or less to the thread of said Green River; Thence Southeasterly along said existing limits of the CIty of Renton to the Southwesterly Right-of-Way Line of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; Page 1 of J '.?.H.6 7/29/86 \ ~ I ....... Thence Southerly along said westerly Right-of-Way Line to the North Right- of-Way Line of Nelson Pl. (Charles Honster Road NO.2); Thence Westerly and Southerly along said city limits line and the northerly and westerly right of way line of Nelson Place produced south to the south right-of-way line of South 153rd Street; Thence Easterly along said Southerly Right-of-Way Line and existing limits of the City of Renton to an intersection with the Northerly Right of Way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR 405) Thence Northeastarly along said right of way line and said City limits line to tha Westerly Right-of-Way Line of the former Northern Pacific Railroad (SNI, Puget Sound Shore RR) e distance of 525 feet more or less; Thence Southerly along said Westerly Right-of-Wey Line and said city limits line to its intersection with the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25; Thence continuing Southerly along said westerly line and said city limits line to a point on a line 410 feet more or less North of the South line of the Henry Header Donation Claim; Thence west elong' said line and said city limits line to an intersection with the Easterly Right-of-way Line of Stat;"Road 181 (West Valley Highway, S.S.H. 5H); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right-or-Way Line and said city limits line to an intersection with the North line of the South 990 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 25; Thence East along said North line and said city limits line to an intersection with the East line of the former' Northern Pacific Railroad Right of Way; Page 2 of J L2.H.6 7/29/86 " . -" ":~ Thence North along said line to its intersection with the South line OF the Southwest 1/4 or Section 24; Thence continuing North and Northwesterly along said Easterly Right-oF-Way Line to an intersection with South line of the Northwest 1/4 of Sectlon 24; Thence continuing Northwesterly along said Easterly Right of Way line to an intersection with a line which is perpendicular to and easterly of the existing easterly City Limits Line of Tukwila as annexed under Ordinance NO. 252; Thence Southwesterly along said perpendicular line to the Southwesterly Right-of-Way Line of the Former Northern Pacific Railway and the True Point of Beginning. . ." Page 3 of J L2.H.6 7/29/86 L .', .~,., . i .. ,.""l;"',, ...... ,&4.41X£ 4~j;:;;;;CMt."¥.C,o.I_i_,ifg'" ATIACHMENT LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACK RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a po~tion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T:3N~ R4E, W.M. and irl tile southeast 1/4 of Section 14, 123N, R4E, W.M., dlso within that portion of Junction Additiorl to Seattle in Vol LlnlS 12 0+ Plats, page 75, record~ of King County, Washington and described more par-ticularly as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the sDuthwesterly mar·gir1 o·f the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 821, page 263, VclLlme 825, page 545, Volume 83()~ page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward AvenLle (Also known as S. 139tll Street) as platted in .~illman·s Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said extension to the northeasterly margin of the 8urlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence cOlltinuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less to the centerline of Beacon. Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shawn an said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence sDuthE.\.:,st~\.rly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to::. the centerline of 68th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road. County Rd.No. 8, ~nd Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said cerlterline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the 81dc~( River; t~lenc2 westerly along said thread to the northeasterly ma.rqin of thi::1 old ChicdqO, r''lilwaukee~ dnd St. F'aul Railro.3d right--c)'f-way mar'gin; thence northwesterly along said north- f=<::i.;:;·j.:erly m~3rgin :300 ·feet mDr(2 (Jf-less to it·:; interse·=tion with thd southwesterly mar'gin of the Burlingtorl Northern Railr'oad (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence al~ng a line at right angles to said souttlwesterly margin a distancE of 100 feet to the G !-":Jrthe", .. "t.",-ly margin of the 8urlington Northern Pailroad 1 __ _ (fornlsrly Pacific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly 210ng said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF 8EGINNING. • -------.., .... ,--,..,.--~-..,...,.,...A"" ... ,. .. .,. .... :;W., ...... ii"' ...... "'.,Z ...... ,- ATTACHMENT LANDS TO TUKWILA ("SOUTHERN") That portion of Section 25 and '6, Township 2' North, Range bEast, W.M., King County, Washington more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as recorded in volume III of Plats, pages 42- bb, Records of King County, Washington and the South line of Government Lot 6 situate in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 2' North, Range 4 East; Thence west along said South line, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1764 (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) to the westerly bank of the Green River (White River); Thence Southerly along said Westerly bank and existing said City limits to the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section '6; Thence continuing Southerly along said Westerly bank and said city limits to the Westerly extention of the North boundary line of the Henry Adams Donation Claim No.4'; Thence East along said North boundary line and its westerly extension and extension of a line lying parallel with and '0.0 feet Southerly of the centerline of S.W. 4'rd Street (South 180th"); Thence East along said Southerly line and its westerly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the Southerly extention of the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Burlington Northern Rallraod (former Northern Pacific Railway) ; Thence North along said Easterly line and its southerly extension to an intersection with the South line of the southwest" lIb of Section 25; Thence continuing North along said East line to its intersection with the I South line of Government Lot 6 and the True Point of Beginning. Pagelorl F ! ATTACHMENT LANDS TO RENTON ("SOUTHERN") BURLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL VACATION That portion of Section follows: T23N, R4E, W.M., described 2S Conlnlerlcing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Vall(-=y Highway (Formerly known as SeCQnd,3ry St,3,tt? Highwa:-/ No.5-M) and the north lir1e of ttle south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4 of said Section 25; thel1ce easterly along said north 1 ine,660 feet more or less to the easterl'Y margin of th~.: Nor-'tl-",er'r\ Pacific Rail~oad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing along said r'lorth lir'le 510 feet more or less to t~je east line o'f said norttlwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 1320 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along said east lif18 and alol1g the east line o·f the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the souttle~st corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said north- west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 o·f said Section 25, 542.81 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad; .thence no~therly along said easterly ma~gin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. G !.N T E R OF FIe E lot E lot 0 TO: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney DATE: 2/4/87 FROM: Maxine' Motor, City Clerk SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4040 Renton/Tukwila Boundry Adjustulent Annexation Dick Houghton is going over the legal, descriptions attached to the Boundary Review Board note which forwards King County Publ~c Works Dept. rejection of both Renton and Tukwila legal descriptions on annexation ordinances (our Ordinance No. 4040 is attached). How should this be handled? cc: Mayor Shinpoch' Larry Springer February 2. 1987 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Metro: Council Structure Annexation: Renton- Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Food Bank Donations Executive Session ADJOURNMENT Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 2/2/87 Renton City Council Minutes Page 44 Legislative House and Senate Bills have been proposed to change the structure of the Metro Council and reduce membership from the present 40 members to 19 representatives comprised of King County Council persons, King County Executive, and nine members of the public elected at large. The City of Renton will join other suburban cities in presenting resolutions constructed by the Mayor of Redmond opposing the bills, and the Association of Washington Cities has taken a stand against the change. IMayors of Renton and Tukwila will attend a ceremony tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. on the Grady Way Bridge to signify the completion of the boundary ,adjustment between the two cities. Initial results on the proposal for City employees to vOluntarily adopt the local food bank have surpassed all expectations. Employees are authorizing a payroll deduction for as little as $1.00 per pay period to permit the food bank to use cash in taking advantage of food sales and planning food distribution to the needy for the entire year. A more comprehensive report will be provided to Council by March I. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING LEGISLATION. CARRIED. Time: 9:11 p.m. Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:30 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk • TO 1117 om ,:1-~ TIME /~.' ~7 WHILE YOU WERE OUT M~ • or k.(!.01~~ ~ PHONE ~ ~t/i-731>1 THEPHONEIl..O ___ ~PlEASE PHONE __ ~ CAll'EO TO SEE you_D ..... ILl CALL AGA1N __ O WANTS TO S[E YOU_ 0 .u'" ____ O , . ® King County (ffi~mdl~Wl um ~ SJIIJI3 Am llQj . -' <- LaSt £ 83.:1 ~~~ Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director 900 King County Administration Bldg.'-----------' 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-2517 February 2, 1987 Gerald A. Peterson Council Administrator C 0 U R THO USE Attention: Helene Mociulski 402;Si! Courthouse 'c'1 p' ... ' : .: ';.",:' -3 /,',j 8 r'? ,-, ~. r'l '" , ... 1<:i:<3 CCCi;(/'COUIiCIi RE: Proposed Boundary Adjustment between CITY OF RENTON and CITY OF TUKWILA Dear Mr. Peterson: The enclosed action concerns property totally within the existing corporate limits of Renton and Tukwila. It is the understanding of this office that the two cities wish to exchange lands along their common boundary. While no County lands are involved in this action, this office finds itself in more than an advisory role inasmuch as we maintain numerous records and mapping systems that will reflect the results of its .finalization. For these reasons we find the description provided in Renton Ordinance Number 4040 unsatisfactory. Please be advised that Exhibit A of the enclosed Renton Ordinance Number 4040 .cannot be considered a legal description. Exhibit A fails the definition of a legal description for the following reasons: o Parcel identification (tax lot numbers) is not a fixed factor. As land subdivision occurs the identity of these lots will be lost. New lots will be created coinciding with the reduction in acreage of the original lot s. o Parcel identification does not address rights of way and river areas as these are not assi9ned tax lot numbers. While the use of Exhibit A may possibly transfer the stipulated lots from one city to the other, it is our opinion that the rights of way and river areas would not be transferred. o The "parcel" listing in Exhibit A does not appear to be complete. A cur- sory review of the listing for the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East finds lots 7, 17 and 36 missing. There may be more. o The "section-township-range" listing in Exhibit A does not appear to be complete. A portion of the proposed area to be transferred to Renton " I Gerald Peterson Februsry 2, 1987 Page Two (north parcel) lies i~ the SW 1/4, Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. Section 13 is not listed. Our office reviewed this proposed land exchange previously for the Boundary Review Board and approved four legal descriptions to accomplish this task. These approved legal descriptions do not appear in the enclosed ordinance. We are at a loss to explain why. ;//;;r'~ R" R K"i~.E. Manager Engineering Services RHK/JRB:kw Enclosure: File cc: Brice Martin, Boundary Review Board J. R. Bergsma . . , King County Department of Public \Vorks Donald J. laBelle, Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seallle. Washington 98104 (206) 344-2517 September 18, 1986 Mr. G. Brice Martin Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board W-378 Courthouse • _ }-\ :~. l , REC "'!' ! C""'" 1 c_! ' ",;' CLEn), KIIiG Cou~nY COUNCil. RE: Proposed Boundary Adjustment betlveen CITY OF RENTO:, and CITY OF TUKWILA (Northern Portion) Temporary File No. 9-1 Dear Mr. Martin: We have checked the legal descriptions of the attached proposed boundary adjustment and find the one labeled "Attachment G" (Lands to Renton - Northern) sa ti s factory .. The other legal description, labeled "Attachment F" (Lands to Tukwila - Northern) has been the subject of much discussion betvleen this office and the tliO cities. Our office and the Department of Assessments has studied the numerous legal descriptions of historical annexations by both cities in this area. These historical documents are full of ambiguities and errors making it virtually impossible to ~Irite a meets and bounds description that would stand without challenge. Our office has contacted Rebecca Fox of the City of Tukwila and Bob Bergstrom of the City of Renton concerning the problems with this area. They have both agreed verbally to have this office write the legal de,scription for this por. tion of the boundary adjustment. Please find attached this revision iden- tified as "Revised Attachment F." The a'cceptance of this revision should resolve any question of the area being transferred from Renton to Tukwila. The related Assessor's map appears to 'be for the same area as described in the legal description. ex H Knigh Manager Engineering Services RHK/JRB:kll Enclosure: Enti re Fill. H 1 ' 1 .. 2 }LIi .. 7 37 ~ cc: e ene MOC1U iKl ~TT 402~ Courthouse ... ",-' , . LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACk RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M., also within that. portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Volume 12 of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more particularly as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 82(, page 263, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (Also known as S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said extension to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence southeasterly along road centerline 250 feet more or less to the centerlin~ of 68th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road, County Rd.No. 8, and Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said centerline 1476 feet more or less to the thread of the Black River; th~nce westerly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad right-of-way margin; thence northwesterly along said north- ea5terly margin 500 f~et more or less to its intersection with the southwesterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence along.a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly Pacific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ca' • SUGGESTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (From City of Renton to City of Tuk"i.la -liorth Part) Al.l that portion of tile City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance tlo. 1764 lyill9 westerly of the east margin of BilRR Company (N.P. Ry) main track right of ~Iay all being located in ti,e st of the IIWa of Section 24, Tovmslli~ 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together with all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying I;esterly of the east margin of BIIRR Company (lI-P. Ry) main track right of way all being located in the SW~ of Section 24,-TOl/nship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M .. Together with all that portion of tile City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BNRR Company (N.P. P,y) main track right of way all being located in tile NWi of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.I·1. King County, Washington 9/16/86:JRB King County Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344·2517 September 18, 1986 Mr. G. Brice Martin Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board W-378 Courthouse ? Eel:: \\.: :.~ : : i, ..) ,-,.' ,,' CLUii; 1,IIIG COUHTY COUHCII. RE: Proposed Boundary Adjustment Between CITY OF RENTON and CITY OF TUKWILA (Southern Portion) Temporary Fil e No. 9-2 Dear Mr. Martin: We ha ve checked the 1 ega 1 descri pti ons of the attached proposedbounda ry adjustment and find them satisfactory. The related Assessor's map appears to be for the same area as described in the legal description. VU~'0>.-0 r '~ ~ ~night, .E. t~anager Engineering Services RHK/JRB: kit Enclosure: Entire File cc: Helene Mociulskt V:;'/ -73 '7,J 4024 Courthouse i 1\ I • "'''"'-I' OYII.-'" I ( _"NDS TO TUKWILA ("SOUTHERt-i That portion of Section 25 and 36, Township 23 North, Range. East, W.M., King County, Washington more particularly described as-follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the Plat of Burlington /1/ Northern Industrial Park Renton II as recorded in Volume III of Plats, pages 42- ~~, Records of King County, Washington and the South line of Government Lot 6 situate in the Southwest l/~ of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range ~ East; Thence West along said South line, said line al$o being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 176~ (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) to the westerly bank of the Green River (white River); Thence Southerly along said westerly bank and existing said City limits to the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36; Thence continuing Southerly along said Westerly bank and said city limits to the westerly extention of the North boundary line of the Henry Adams Oon~tion Claim ~o. ~3; Thence East along-~aid North boundary line and its westerly extension and said city limits to the centerline of Secondary State Highway Number SM; Thence South along said centerline and said city limits to the westerly extension of a line lying parallel with and '0.0 feet Southerly of the centerline of S.W. ~'rd Street (South 180th); Thence East along said Southerly line and its westerly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the Southerly extention of the Easterly Right-of-way Line or the Burlington Northern Railraod (former Northern Pacific Railway); Thence North along said Easterly line and its southerly extension to an intersection with the South line of the Southwes~l/~ of Section 25; Thence continuing North along said East line to its intersection with the South 11ne of Government Lot 6 and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 T.F.9-2 H-~ MOC-ltJLSf:;./ CITY OF TUKWILA Prop. Boundary Adjust/Renton (Southern PortioN) .' , n I I nVI IIVICI'! I ( LANDS TO RENTON ("SOUTHERN") BURLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL VACATION That portion of Section 25, T23N, R4E, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Valley Highway (Formerly known as Secondary State Highway No.5-MI and the north line of the south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4 of said Section·25; thence easterly along said north line,660 feet more or less to the easter}y margin of the Northern F'acific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing along said north line 510 feet more or less to the east line of said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 1320 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along said east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said north- west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 25, 542.81 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad; .thence northerl',.. along said easterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. T.F.9-2 CITY OF TUKWILA Prop. Boundary Adjust/Renton (Southern Portion) THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOR, January 27. 1987 Mr. Howard A. Strong Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Puget BuUding Bellevue. WA 98009 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25~ I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Mr. Strong: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a,m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Max.ine E. Motor. CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUI LOING 200 MI LL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MQTOR. January 27, 1987 John Klassell Washington State·Department of Transportation 6431 Corson Avenue South Seattle. WA 98198 CITV CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. , 'Dear Mr. Klassell: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E.Motor. CMC City Clerk HEM/nn Enclosure \ THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MilL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98056' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOR, January 27, 1987 Tukwila City Council 6200'Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2&0 I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Council Members: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON -. Maxin~ E. Motor, CMC City Clerk HEM/nn Enclosure cc: Barbara Y. Shinpoch. Mayor Thomas Trinun, Council President Lawrence Springer. Policy Development Director \ THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOA. • Jan,uary 27. 1987 Pacific Northwest Bell ATTENTION: Marjorie J •. Wickham. Area Manager Community Affairs & Services 300 S.W. Seventh, Room 145 Renton. WA 98055 CITV CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Ms. Wickham: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving num~er 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor. CMC , City' Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98056 BARBARA y, SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR. January 27. 1987 Mr. Lon Hurd 3-H Management & Consultants 4517 California S.W. Seattle, WA 98116 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: 'City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Mr. Hurd: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987, at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely, CITY O.F RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOR, . January 27. 1987 Pacific Northwest Bell General Accountant Tax ~ Regulatory Matters 1600 Seventh Avenue. Room 2307 Seattle. WA 98191 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Sir: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1967. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor. CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure OF f .. :~ ..... CJ · ... ,.,.'''.--... -~----.~------,.-.. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, January 27. 1987 • Mr. Hank O'Claire Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau 2001 Western Seattle. WA 98104' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary· Adjustment Annexation. . Dear Mr. O'Claire: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving number 8701261241. This·ordinance will be in effect on February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Maxin~ E. Motor. CMC City Clerk HEM/nn Enclol1ure il ! .. '. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4040 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON (RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT) WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35.10.217 and RCW 35A.14.300, the legislative body, by majority vote, elected to annex certain territory outside its city Limits as hereinbelow more particularly described, for municipal purposesl and WHEREAS the City Council fixed January 5, 1987 as a time and place for a public hearing in the City Couricil Chambers, City. Hall, Renton, Washington 1 and WHEREAS pursuant to said Notice, a public hearing has been held at the time and place specified in the aforesaid notice and the Council having duly considered all matters and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable have been duly complied withl and WHEREAS a proper "Notice of Intention" . having been filed with the King County Boundary.Review Board as required by .law, and deemed approved as per their letters of November 11 and November 18, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The aforesaid findings, recitals and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respectsl all requirements of the law in regard to the annexation as per RCW 35A.14.300 have been fully complied with. -1- '. ORDINANCE NO. 4040 It is further determined that the below described property is being annexed into the City of Renton for municipal purposes and such annexation to be effective after the approval, passage and publication of this Ordinance and on 12:01 A.M. on February 4, 1987 and on and after said date said property shall be and constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; said property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the, Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and publication and on 12:01 A.M. on February 4, 1987. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. SECTION III: The above described annexed property contiguous to Precinct Nos. 11-95 of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a part of Precinct Nos. 11-95 of said City. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19thday of January, 1987. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of January, 1987. d as to form: Lawrence Attorney Date of Publication: January 23, 1987 -2- EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 LANDS TO dE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FROM N::NTON The lands proposed to be annelCed to the City of Tukwlla from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOe 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOe (p) T.9l 1.14 9 MOe (p) 3.05 43 2.15 SO 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOe 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 . 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 5.54 36 3.09 TOTAL 45 percels 101.65 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 LANDS TA ANNEXED TO RENTON FRDM l ... .<WJLA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are llated below and shown In Figure 1. SECTIoN-TOWNSHIP-RANGE . PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4's of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE and NW 1/4's of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sac. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 ol6o (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 ol5o 1.49 0320 .28 0"0 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 1 • EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 Renton-Tuk_ Boundl"1 AdjuSmlftt KIp ~~ Affected Arels .' '" . .• Unds to Renton lC~RES ~ ~·L .. mnl to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila t. 1000' o • Aree p $ubject to Joint Tukwila·Rento~view 1,,11 Future Annexation Petiti~ EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 ... \. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJoie ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News JournaL-, Daily Record Chronicle1L-, Daily Globe News __ , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on January 25. 1987 R2057 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sumof$ 18.45 Subscrii?ed.and s:orn to before me this 28 th day of Jan 19~ . ~ . • . >.. VN #87 Revised 10184 . C/ ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 9th day of February, 1987. at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the lime and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Zoning classifications for properties in- cluded in the Rentonrrukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. The northern por. tion includes an existing rock crusher operation and L-t light Industry zoning is recommended. The second portion lo- cated southerly of Longacres is recom. mended MoP Manufacturing Park zone which is consistent with recent areawide Green River Valley rezone. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk Published in the Valley Daily News Jan. 25, 1987. R2057 L y ,\ .... ; ~J AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey De Joie ,being first duly sworn on oath states that heishe is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order ofthe Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News JournaL-, Daily Record Chronicle--.!.., Daily Globe News __ , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly. distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Ordinance No. 4040 was published on January 23. 1987 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 55.35 Subscribed and swo~n to before me this 28th day of Jan 19---.8.1-. VN #87 Revlaed HW8<l y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. / -::::=-- Public Notice ublic hearing has been held at the time and place specified in the aforesaid notice and the Council having duly considered all maners and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable have been duly complied with; and WHEREAS a proper "Notice 01 Inten- tion" having been filed with the King County Boundary Review Board as re- quired by law. and deemed approved as per their letters of November 11 and November 18, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY COUN- C I L 0 F TH E CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS ___ -,--,-_·-'-'FOLLOWS: . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON SECTION I: The .Ioresald' Ilndlngs, ORDINANCE NO, 4040' recitals and determinations are hereby' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF found to be true and correct in all respects; RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING all requirements of the law in regard to the CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF annexa,lon as per RCW 3SA.14.300 have RENTON, WASHINGTON (RENTON-been luily compiled wilh. TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT) II Is further determined that the below WHEREAS under the provisions of described property is being annexed into RCW35, 10,217 and RCW35A, 14.300, the the City of Renton for municipal purposes legislative body, by majority vote, elected and such annexation to be effective after to annex certain territory outside its 'City the approval, passage and publication of Limta 8S hereinbelow more particularly this Ordinance and on 12:01 A.M. on described, tor municipal purposes; and PbiJruary 4, 1987 and on and after said WHEREAS the City Council fixed date said property shall be and constitute a January 5, 1987 as a time and place for a part of the City of Renton and shall be . PU9lic Notice :'.: subject to aU Its ll\wS and ordinances th.~n . and thereafter in torce a~d effect; sa{d property being de!lcribed as follows: ',',. See Exhibit "A" on file in City Clerk's office. ~ , (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S. W. and the Blir-" lingta" Northern Railroad tracks anlJ. south of Longacres racetrack) ~.' SECTION II: This Ordinance shall):t' effe~tive upon its. passage, approval anA publication and or"! 12:01 A,M. on Febru,~ryl 4, 19S,. . . A certified copy of this Ordinance sha~1 be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, ard as otherwise provid8~d . by law. ' : ! .. SECTION III:' The above described annexed prope~ contiguous to Precinct Nos. 11 ~95 of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a part of Precinct Nos. 11-as of saia City. i ~ • PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19th day of January, 1987. .:. Maxine E. Motor, City Clq.rk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR Ihis 19th day of January, 1987. . Barbara Y. Shinpoch. Mayor Approved as to form: ". Lawrence J. Warren. City Anorney . Published in the' Valley Daily News, t January 23. 1987. R2053' .• ( public hearing in the City Council Chamb- ers, City Hall, Renton, Washington; and ----------------.~-----'--"'-.""- WHEREAS pursuant to said Notice, a , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MDTOR. January ,23 • 1987 Office of the Clerk of the Council Room 403. King County Courthouse Seattle. WA 98104 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: City of Renton -Ordinance No. 4040 -Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation. Dear Sir: Enclosed are seven certified copies of Ordinance Number 4040 which was filed with King County Records and Elections under the receiving numbers shown on the documents. Boundary Review Board letter attached. This ordinance will be in effect February 4. 1987. at 12:01 a.m. Sincerely. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E; Motor. CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosures (7) January 19. 1987 OLD BUSINESS Committee of the Whole ParkS: Community Center Legislature: A WC Recommendations Final PUD: Sunpointe Phase II, Polygon Corporation, FPUD-087- 86 Rentop City Council Minutes Page 24 Council President Trimm presented a Committee of the Whole report advising that a meeting had been held with the Park Department and architectural consultants to discuss progress to date on the Community Center project. The Committee of the Whole recommended referral of the matter to the Community Services Committee for monitoring and reporting to the whole Council as necessary. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Council President Trimm presented a report recommending that the Administration rely on the AWC recommendations on 1987 legislative issues presented throughout the L~gislative Session. Staff is further directed to present issues to Council of particular interest to the City of Renton for review and recommendation; and brief Council periodically on the status of key issues as necessary. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. It was clarified that only issues not previously discussed by Council would be presented for separate review and recommendation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS BEING ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION REGARDING THE STREET VACATION BILL WHICH HAS TO DO WITH WATERFRONT PROPERTY; AND SECONDLY, THAT THE CITY OPPOSE THE WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT BILL WHICH GIVES THE COUNTY ALL OF THE AUTHORITY. CARRIED. City Clerk Motor was directed to forward all correspondence regarding Sunpointe Phase II Final PUD to Planning & Development Committee Chair and members. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Ordinance #4039 PUD Ordinance and Summary Annexation: Renton- Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Final Plat: Sale of Lots, Hearing Examiner Letter Fire: Emergency Services Organization Ordinance Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending the fOllowing ordinances for second and final reading: An ordinance and summary ordinance were read amending Chapter 27 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code by deleting the existing Chapter 27 in its entirety and substituting in its place a new Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Stredicke recalled 90-signature petition opposing the ordinance. ROLL CALL: 5 A YES: TRIMM, HUGHES, KEOLKER, REED, MATHEWS. 2 NA YS: CLYMER, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Chairman Keolker pointed out that changes requested by Council are on pages I I and 22 of the ordinance. It was also pointed out that the effective date of the ordinance is 30 days after publication. (See Resr,lution #2669 extending PUD moratorium.) An ordinance was mad annexing certain territory to the City of Renton, for Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 A YES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, KEOLKER, REED, MATHEWS. ONE NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. (Ordinance will be in effect on 2/4/87.) Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the fOllowing ordinances for first reading: An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 9-1110 of Title IX (Public Ways and Property) of City Code relating to penalties for violation of the Subdivision Ordinance. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. An ordinance was read repealing Chapter 3 of Title II (Commissions and Boards) of City Code relating to Civil Defense. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways. and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following resolutions for reading and adoption: -.' \ i ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTION WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 19, 1987 " The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances and summary ordinance for second and final reading: PUD Ordinance and Summary Ordinance . Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment -Annexing Certain Territory to the City of Renton The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: I . Amending Portions of Section 9-1110 Relating to Penalties for Violation of the Subdivision Ordinance . , Repealing Civil Defense Chapter The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading .and adoption: Author;izing Borrowing of Funds -Non-interest bearing interfund loan from the General Fund (000) to General Government Miscellaneous Debt Service Fund (215) Resolution Extending PUD Moratorium , Ear lYmer ~ " =- , January 19. 1987 Olympic Pipeline Leak Maplewood Golf Course Citizen Comment: Post - Driveway Requirements CONSENT AGENDA Finance: Debt Service Payment Annexation: Sierra Heights 75% Petition Rezone: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Ad justment Prope.rty Streets: King County Joint Overlay Project, Duvall Avenue NE/Edmonds Avenue NE Item 6.b.: Appointment: Board of Ethics Added Item: Appointment: Municipal Court Judge Pro Tem Renton City Council Mjnutes Page 23 Secondly, Mr. Hagadorn Questioned whether the City would be willing to assist residents of the Maplewood Heights area by underwriting a class action suit against Olympic Pipeline Company for damages caused by the recent natural gas leak. City Attorney Warren assumed that because the lawsuit would be for the personal benefit of the homeowners in that area, it would be violation of State constitution for the City to lend its credit. For the City to assist, the lawsuit would have to be of City-wide concern and benefit the general public. Upon further Council inquiry, Mr. Warren advised that although he has not had the opportunity to research the matter, if there was in fact a regulatory-type suit brought against the pipeline or other action by the City for the lJublic safety, health or welfare, that may be within the province of the City dependent upon several overriding issues. Mayor Shinpoch also clarified that Council made the difficult decision to purchase the golf course for two reasons: to protect the City's water supply and preserve open space proposed for immediate development of condominiums. She advised that the golf course is currently generating revenue and will eventually pay for itself as reflected in a long-range development plan prepared by ParkS Director John Webley and available for public review. Additionally, the City owns and maintains 27 parks for the enjoyment and benefit of the general pUblic. Administrative Assistant Parness pointed out that that upon transfer of an additional 95 acres by King County at no cost to the City, one of the stipulations was that a portion be developed within the next five years for public recreational uses not associated with the golf course. George Post, 1122S. 27th Place, Renton, referenced his previous inquiry to Council regarding number of driveways allowed by City Code in a residential area. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to send Mr. Post all material submitted by City departments on the matter. Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Upon Council request, item 6.b. was removed for separate consideration. Finance Department requested adoption of resolution to authorize non- interest bearing interfund loan from General Fund (000) to General Government Miscellaneous Debt Service Fund (215), amount not to exceed 581,000.00. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set on February 9, 1987, to consider the 75% Sierra Heights Annexation Petition, for 33 acres located on the west side of Union Avenue NE westerly to 128th Avenue SE and from SE 102nd Street southerly to south of SE 106th Street. Council concur. I Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set on . February 9, 1987, to consider imposing zoning on properties transferred to Renton as result of Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment. Council concur. Public Works Department requested review of interlocal agreement with King County for joint installation of street overlay on Duvall Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE which straddle City/County boundaries. Refer to Transportation Committee.- MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch reappoints Mary Mattson to the Board of Ethics, 7273 South 128th Street, Seattle, to a four-year term effective to December 31, 1990; Ms. Mattson has served since 1977 and has been recommended for continued service by the League of Women Voters of King County South. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MA YOR'S REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch appointed the following persons to serve as Municipal Court judges Pro Tem effective to 12/31/87: King County District Court Judge Charles Delaurenti, 3407 NE 2nd Street, Renton; and King County District Court Judge Robert McBeth, 3407 NE 2nd Street, Renton. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS. CARRIED. • For.Use.By City Clerk's Office Only A.1. # b .d. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCil MEETING ===================================_=============== =_-============a ••• ==============aa====== SUBMITTING DePt./Div./Bd./Comm.~_P~o_l~i~c~y __ D_e_v_e_l_o~p_m_e_n_t __ Staff Contact __ -,~~S~tre~v~e~M~un==so~n~ ________ __ (Name) SUBJECT: Zoning of the Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Properties Exhibits: (legal Oeser., Maps, Etc.)Attach· A Letter .----------------------------- B. __ ~M~a~p~ __________ ~ ______ ~ __ __ C. ____________ _ COUNCil· ACTION RECOMMENDED: Set a public hearing for F I SCAl IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount Budgeted $ Fo r Ag e n da 0 f __ =J_a_n,..u:-ar __ y--;:-1..,9_,...-1_9_B_7 ____ __ (Meeting Date) Agenda Status: Consent ____________________ _ Public Hearing. ______________ _ Cor respondence. ________ ~------ Ordinance/Resolution .------- Old Business ________________ _ New Business ________________ _ Study Session. ______________ __ Other ______________________ __ Approva I: lega I Dept. Yes Finance Dept. Yes No No. N/A N/A Other Clearance __________________ __ Appropriation- Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementat.ion). (Attach additional pages if necessary.) On January 5, 19B7, the Renton City Council adopted Resolution No. 2667 establishing the 30-day protest period for property owners of the area to be annexed in the Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment. The TukwilaCity Council adopted a similar resolution on the same date. The protest period will expire February 4, 19B7, at 12:01 a.m. The Policy Develop- ment Department is now requesting that Council set a public hearing date of February 9, 19B7, to consider imposing zoning on the properties transferred to Renton (see attached letter). PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 Z _a? '6 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. so. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ~.() '0. 0"i! ((,.~ "'''~o SEP1~"'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 19, 19B7 The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council Renton, Washington 9B055 RE: Zoning of Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Properties Dear Mayor and Council Members: Pursuant to passage of Resolution No. 2667 approving the Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment, the Policy Development Department is now prepared to recommend zoning for the involved properties. It is, therefore, advised that the City Council set a public hearing date of February 9, 1987, to consider imposition of zoning. These sites are grouped into Area "A" and Area "B" for ease of reference (see attached map). Area "A" is composed principally of the Black River Quarry. This site contains an existing rock crusher operation and associated equipment storage and repair. It is presently zoned M-I or Light Industrial in the City of Tukwila. We would, therefore, advise that the City of Renton's L-l or Light Industrial zoning be applied to the site. For Area "B" we would advise consideration of the following: I) The City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan for the area indicates a land use designation of Manufacturing Park. In recent deliberations, the Planning Commission recommended Manufacturing Park zoning for existing city properties in this area, and the City Council adopted the category as part of the areawide Green River Valley rezone. The policy issues would seem clear, and it is advised that Council also impose Manufacturing Park zoning for these newly annexed territories. · .. ...,. ~ The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council January 19, 1987 Page 2 2) Alternatively, if Council feels there are other issues, then the zoning matter can be referred to the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing and make recommendations to Council. LMS:SM:2375G:wr Attachment • I 1-+- .. i -.. ~ .. Renton-Tu~~ila Boundary Adjustment ~Ii jf Affected Areas .' Lands to Renton(AR~ "A~ _~ . , . .... , ,,' -. _ . .. . .~ . ... . ~ .,' LONGACRES Lands to Tukwila " .. Lands to Renton (M'Ef\"\8~ to Tukwila· , . o /lll/Se. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. vanDusen, Mayor .January 13, 1987 City of Renton City Counci 1 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1029, ANNEXING CERTAIN PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA Dear Council Members: The Tukwila City Council, at its Regular Meeting of January 5, 1987, adopted Resolution No. 1029. This Resolution completes the boundary line adjustment between our Cities. The annexation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on February 4, 1987 after a 30-day appeals period. In accordance with the requirements of the Resolution, I am filing a cer- tified copy with you. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Maxi ne Anderson City Clerk /cs \ , I, Maxine Anderson, City Clerk of the City of T ila, do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the ori gi nill on fil e with the City. DATED this 13th day of January, 1987. ~~ /Z dAX!?-e+1 ~y~ CITY OF TUKWILA, ' 0042.010.009 JEH/ko 12/01/86 01/06/87 WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 1 02 9 .A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL·OF THE ,CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUKW[LA FROM THE CITY OF RENTON: . WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2651 of the City of Renton requested that the City of Tukwila annex certain real property located in the City of Renton as part of a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries, and WHEREAS, Resolution 1008 of the City of Tukwila declared the City of Tukwila's willingness to accept such annexation upon certa'in conditions and requested that the City of Renton annex certain property located within the City of Tukwila as a reciprocal measure designed to simplify the common boundary, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila entered into an inter local agreement providing· for shared responsibilities with respect to the areas to be annexed by both cities, and. WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board has reviewed the proposed annexations and boundary change and has approved the ·same, and WHEREAS, pursuant toRCW 35.10.217 and upon proper notice, a public hearing was held on the proposed annexation before the City Council of the City of Tukwila on January 5, 1987, at which all persons who were interested in the annexation were allowed to participate, and WHEREAS, after such public hearing, the City Council of the City of Tukwil~ has determined to annex the area, no~, therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation of Area from Renton. Pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, the real property previously located in the City of Renton and legally described on Exhibi tA attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila. Section 2. Duties of City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Renton City Council and the King County Council. Section 3 Effective Date. This resolution, and the annexation accomplished hereby, shall take effect and be in full force at 12:01 a.m. on February 4, 1987: thirty (30) days after adoption, unless the owners of property in the area annexed by this resolution, equal in value to 60% or more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area, file a written protest with the Tukwila City Council of the City of Tukwila prior to the effective "date. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 5th day of January, 1987. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: C1T¥'CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON FILED WITH TH PASSED BY T E RESOLUTION N APPROVED: ~Af O~c ~ ~,(. . iI. DUFFIE &UNCIL PRESIDENT ;.. I EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of . Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rae. 4 27 (oortion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84. 51' 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 2.16 22 (oortion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 , 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 I 5.54 36 3.09 I TOTAL 45 parcels 101. 65 ... ~q 'i": 'I G ;~.':\ 9', ~~3 : _" ... ' ,I r,ltlG cos®I~Y 0042.010.009 JEH/ko I, Maxi-'Anderson, City Clerk of the City of kwila, do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the ori gi na 1 on fil e \~ith the City. DATED this,13th day of January, 1987. , ~~~ OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON '12/01/86 01/06/87 RESOLUTION NO. _---11JJ.O .... 2""9 __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FROM THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2651 of the City of Renton requested that the City of Tukwila annex certain real property located in the City of 'Renton as part of a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries, and WHEREAS, Resolution 1008 of the City of Tukwila declared the City of Tukwila's willingness to accept such annexation upon certain conditions and requested that the City of Renton annex certain property located within the City of Tukwila as a reciprocal measure designed to simplify the common boundary, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila entered into an interlocal agreement providing for shared responsibilities with respect to the areas to be annexed by both cities, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board has reviewed the proposed annexations and boundary change and has approved the same, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.10.217 and upon proper notice, a public hearing was held on the proposed annexation before the City council of the City of Tukwila on January 5, 1987, at which all persons who were interested in the annexation were allowed to participate, and WHEREAS, after such public hearing, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has determined to annex the area, now, therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation 'of Area from Renton. Pursuant to RCW 35,.10.217, the real property previously located in the City of Renton and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila. Section 2. Duties of City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Renton City Council and the King County Council. Section 3 Effective Date. This resolution, and the annexation accomplished hereby, shall take effect and be in full force at 12:01 a.m. on February 4, 1987; thirty (30) days after adoption, unless the owners of property in the area annexed by this resolution, equal in value to 60% or more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area, file a written protest with the Tukwila City Council of the City of Tukwila prior to the effective date. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 5th day of January, 1987. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY i CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY TORNEY ~Y ~ FILED WITH TH PASSED BY T E RESOLUTION N APPROVED: PRESIDENT EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24 Twn. 23 Rge. 4 27 (portion) I~. 79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 2.16 22 ~ortion} 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) . 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 . 61 0.17 I· 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 I 34 I 5.54 36 3.09 I TOTAL 45 parcels 101. 65 I . .. .'. -. ••• ",_-,. • ....1 ·G ~; ( LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACI, RIVER F'ARCEL A par~el of land ~urrently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T:3N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T:3N, R4E, W.N., als6 within that. portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Vol~lIne r: of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more particularly as follows: . . I 8eginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pa~ific Railway right-of~way as recorded respe~t ively in Volume S:1, page :b3, Volume 8:5, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King C6unty, and the easterly ex tensi on of the centerl i ne of Edward Aven~le (Also known as S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said extension to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad rig~t-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less ·to the cente·rl i ne of Beacon Coal Mi ne Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; then~e southei',st",rly along road centerline :50 feet more or less to the centerlin~ of bSth Avenue South (Al~o known as Steel Hill Road, CO'.lnty ~:d.No. S, and ~lonster Road); thence sO~ltheasterly ... lor.g said centerline 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the 81ack River; th&nce we5terly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad right-oi-way margin; then~e northwesterly along said north- eaaterly margin 500 feet more or less to its interse~tion with the southwesterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacifi~ Coast Railroad); thence along,a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly PaCific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF &EGINNING. r;:; \f\' ":a ~ ~ ~ \;\ I' :: SUGGESTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (From City of Renton to City ot' Tukwi.1a -North Part) A 11 that porti on of the Ci ty of Renton as annexed by City Ordi nance 110. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BURR Company (N.P. Ri) main track right of way all being located in tile Si of the Ilwi of Section Z4, TOrlnshi;J 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together ~Iith all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordi nance No. 1764 1yi ng westerly of the east margi n of BIIRR Company (II. P. Ri) main track right of riay all being located in the SWi of Section 24, TOlmship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Together with all that portion of the City of Renton as annexed by City Ordinance No. 1764 lying westerly of the east margin of BIIRR Company (II.P. Ri) main track right of way all being located in the NW! of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.I~. King County, Washington 9/16/86:JRB / f •• ~ J. __ ....... ~....:_ .. _ ......• ~_i.-;.,~:,:':.:':::..":"'_ .;...., ......... __ .,.; .. :. ______ ~ _ .... .:.::~ ......... __ t._· ____ ~~~--'......:_ •. -"' •• n\J.IIY.C.'4 • ~r ( :: (" , . //-lANDS TO 'EHTON ("SOUTHERN") BURLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL VACATION That portion of Section follows: T:3N, R4E, W.M., described as Commencing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Valley Highway (Formerly known as Secondary State Highway No.5-M) and the north line of the south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4'of said Section :5; thence easterly along said north line,660 feet more or less to the easter~y margin of the Northern F'acific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence con- tinuing along said north line 510 feet more or less to the east line of said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section :5, 13=0 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along sard east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section :5, ::60 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section :5; thence westerly along the south line of said north~ west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section :5, and along the south line of the north 1,: of the southwest 1/4 of said Section :5, 54:.91 feet to the easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad; ,thence northerl'!, along said easterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. , I I , . ~;"~.~_ ,!..~ ...... ...:a.":.~ .. .l ......... ;;~.-.,.:c....i~.~::."';.;;...: L.'';',. "'~''',",c __ ........ ~ ... _____ e ........ :t_~ _________ :....._ ,/''', /-- n •• r'...., •• , ....... , II ( LANDS TO TUKWILA ("SOUTHERh I ,I, I Thst portion or Section 2S snd ", Township 2' North, Ranga • East, W.M.J 1 King County, .ashington eora particularly described as rQllowsl I Beginning at tha intersection ot the weat line or the Plat at Burlington I 'I' I Northern Industrial Park Renton 11 as recorded in Voluea III at Plats, pagas 42-, I ", Records at King County, Washington and tha South lin. or Covern.ent Lot 'I situate in tha Southwest 1" or Section 25, Township 2' North, Range. East; Thence weat along aald South line, aaid 11na al.o being the exiating limita ot the City ot Renton aa annexed by Ordinanca No. 17" (a.ended by Ordinance NO. 1'28) to the .aaterly bank at tha Craen River (White River); Thence Southerly along aaid .esterly bank end exiatlng said City limita to the North line ot the Northweat 1,. at Section "I I Thenca continuing Southerly along .aid .eaterly bank and aald city limit, to the .eaterly extentlon ot the North boundary line of the Henry Adam. Donation Claim ~o. "1 I Thence Ea.t along .ald North boundary line and It •• eater1y extension an. said city 11mlta to the centerline at Secondary State Hlghw.y Number SM; Tnence South .long said centerline and said city limits to the Westerly extension ot a line lying parallel with and 30.0 teet Southerly at the centerline or S.W •• 3rd Street (South 18Dthl; Thence East along said Southerly line and It. westarly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the Southerly extentlon ot the Easterly I i I I Rlght-or-.ay Line or the Burlington Northern Rallraod (rormer Northern Pacltlc I Ra'U .. y); Thence North along .ald Ealterly line and Its southerly extension to an I Intersection with the South line or the South.esi· 1/. of Section 25; Thence continuing North along said Ealt lin. to Ita lnterlectlon with the ! South line at Covernment Lot' and the True Point at Beginning. Page 1 or 1 ,! T.F.9-2 CITY OF TUKWILA Prop. Boundary Adjust/Renton -... : -,-, Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Rento" Qevlew ,f ~11 Future Annexation Petftf EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 " \ I , • . • EXHIBIT. ORDINANCE NO. Renton-rukwflt 8ounOiry AdJultienc "'p of Aff.C~ Art .. to Renton .... .... .... ~ Lands to Tukwila . I· 4040 , I Lands to Renton I Lands to Tukwila N o 1000' EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4040 LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown In Figure I. SECTIDN-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 2S. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 41 l'.OS NE and NW 1/4's of Sec. 2S. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4, 4 2'.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 2S. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 42 16.0' SE' 1/4 of Sec. 2S. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 U 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.7' 014S .2' Ol5S (portion) 1.2' 01S0 1.4' 0'20 .28 0"0 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 percels 114.01 / EXHIBIT A INANe! NO. 4040 LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FRCJ\4 RENTON The lands propoaad to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are Hated below and shown In Figure I. SECTIDN-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 '.62 27 (portion) l2T9 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 li3 2.'5 '2 0.27 2a '.a5 7 IoIlC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 ,a 1.84 0.91 a IoIlC (p) 2.91 ...!..:J! 9 IoIlC (p) '.05 4' 2.15 so 0.84 51 0.72 2' 2.16 6 6.70 24 (portion) -L!! 411.10 21 MOe 2.45 22 (portion) -L!! 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 21 1.61 S9 0.'7 20 2.14 " '.69 17 5." 2' (portion) ..1..Q! 10.43 -24 (portion) 5.411 44.10 22 '.01 - NW 114 of Sec. 36. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 97 '.00 57 a.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.a, 4' 0.10 . '7 0.17 ,a 0.14 . " 0.14 5' 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.'2 10 0.14 9 0.19 S9 0.15 a 0.17 1.7 0.12 3S 2.84 '4 5.S4 3li '.09 TOTAL 4S parcels 101.6S ORDINANCE NO. 4040 It is further determined that the below described property is being annexed into the City of Renton for municipal purposes and· such annexation to be effective after the approval, passage and publication of this Ordinance and on 12:01 A.M. on February 4, 1987 and on and after said date said property shall be and constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; said property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and publication and on 12:01 A.M~ on February 4, 1987. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. SECTION III: The above described annexed property contiguous to Precinct Nos. ' 11-95 of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a part of Precinct Nos. 11-95 of said City. PASSED BY THE CITY1:0UNCIL this 19thdayof January, 1987. ??;;?e<e z<' )£ ~ ... Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED'BY THE MAYOR this 19th day of January, 1987. Barbara Y. hinP3C:MaYQr as to form: Lawrence J. Warr Attorney Date of Publication: January 23, 1987 -2- . I I , om~£ ~F 111£ CIIY CU1X aw mlilolUMICIPAI, BlDG. 200 Miil A'il so. WliOJl,WA9a5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4040 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON (RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT) WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35.10.217 and RCW 35A.14.300, the legislative body, by majority vote, elected to annex certain territory outside its City Limits as hereinbelow more particularly described, for municipal purposes1 and WHEREAS the City Council fixed January 5, 1987 as a time and place for a public hearing in the City Couricil Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington 1 and WHEREAS pursuant to said Notice, a public hearing has been held at the time and place specified in the aforesaid notice and -o '0 I lJ' 'R ! () the Council having duly considered all matters and further determined! that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable have been duly complied with1 and WHEREAS a proper "Notice of Intention" having been filed with the King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and deemed approved as per their letters of_November 11 and November 18, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The aforesaid findings, recitals and • determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respect~; - I all requirements of the law in regard to the annexa-tion as per RCW 35A.14.300 have been fully complied with. CERTIFICATE I. the underslaned, Maxine E. Motor Clerk of the City of Renton, Weshlnaton, certify that this Is a true and correct copyof __ O.:.r:;,:d:.i:;,:.n~a;:,!n.::.ce::....:N;.;o:.:,-::.4~04::.:·O,,--__ _ Subscribed and seal~:: ;aYe?~ r.itv C1srk -1-,-, L ) c' ~:) , -, r, ---"1 r .. '::-J ---n ::: .-.J --) -, , - J C!'l'Y or TUK\·:ILA Prop. BO'.ll'ld..!ry M.~just/Renton ..• -. __ .. _---- ,. -... --- ., Renton-T.koti 11 60"no"y Adjustment Map of Affecteo Ar •• s LanOs to Renton :..; Lands to Tukwila Lanas to Renton Lands to Tukwi h o 10 •• ' • -' I l,,1 , ,- ANN E XA T ION TO ?enton-l'ukwila land exchange COUNCIL DISTRICT ___ 8 ______ _ KING COUNTY ORD. NO. CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO. !\enton Ord 4040 effective ooa Jan 28, 1987 , February 24, 1987 Records Section King County Council Gary Grant. Chair Gerald Peterson, Council Administrator Room 402, King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-2500 311 King County Adminfstration Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: CITY OF RENTON (Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment) Ordinance No. 4040 BRB Ffl eNos, 1402 and 1403 North and South Boundaries All necessary documents and required reports are now a matter of record on the above subject, therefore, the processing of this proposal is finalized. Accordingly, we are forwarding copies of the necessa~ documents to the various interested county departments and other agencies. Gerald A. Peterson Council Administrator by: r...-y" ./~ .. ''1 ,,",, '-"la "A-. l/ ~. -.......... ;'.-(;(1 ;J7 _~ 3270A/hdm .' cc: Department of Assessments Boundary Review Board Building & Land Development Division Fi nance Offi ce General Services Division METRO Planning Division + Planning & Graphics Department of Public Safety Department of Public Works Elections Division Environmental Health Services Washington State Department of Ecology Kroll Maps thomas Brothers Maps Chicago Title Insurance Company Commonwealth Land Title Insurance First American Title Company of Washington Ticor Title Insurance Safeco Title Insurance Company Transmerica Title Insurance Company Washington Natural Gas Company K. C. 911 Program -Attn: Barbara Grothe City of Renton Ci ty of Tukwi 1 a AUDRIY ORUOIR LOIS NORTH PAULBAADEN District 1 District .. District 7 CYNTHIA SULLIVAN RON SIMS BOBORIIVI District 2' " District 5 District 8 BILL REAMS BRUCmLAINO OAAYOAANT District 3 District 8 District 9 I I .' , '-:n-1 -, • :-!jHI~jg,,'tIOI\l -"\ y.LL( "k~q(t... . . • City o.kwila, do Certif;tti'f;\Clty Clerk oltha t,,".O and correct co' a t .'S IS a on file with, !he Cit PY o( \he original DATE~.g¥. ~d. ~~. Of~ p~ --. 7<4'AAn-<:_ ~iL.£..,_ Glty CI~rk _ ' . . . "- CITY OF TUKWILA 0042.010.009 JEH/ko 12/01/86 01/06/87 WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO, __ 1uO ... 2 .... 9<-__ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FROM THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2651 of the City of Renton requested that the City of Tukwila annex certain real property located in the City of Renton as part of a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries, and WHEREAS, Resolution 1008 of the City of Tukwila declared the City of Tukwila's willingness to accept such annexation upon certain conditions and requested that the City of Renton annex certain property located within the City of Tukwila as a reciprocal measure designed to simplify the common boundary, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila entered into an interlocal agreement providing for shared responsibilities with respect to the areas to be annexed by both cities, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board has reviewed the proposed annexations and boundary change and has approved the same, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.10.217 and upon proper notice, a public hearing was held on the proposed annexation before the City Council of the City of Tukwila on January 5, 1987; at which all persons who were interested in the annexation were allowed to participate, and WHEREA~, after such public hearing, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has determined to annex the area, now, therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation of Area from Renton. Pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, the real property previously located in the Ci ty of Renton and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if "set' forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila. Section 2 . Duties of City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy, of this resoiution with the -, _0 • Renton City Counc 1 and the King County Council. " Section 3 Effective Date. This resolution, and the annexation accomplished hereby, shall take effect and be in full force at 12:01 a.m. on February 4, 1987; thirty (30) days after adoption, unless the owners of property in the area annexed by this resolution, equal in value to 60% or more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area, file a written protest with the Tukwila City Council of the City of Tukwila prior to, the effective date. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 5th day of January, 1987. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: MAXINE ANDERSON FILED WITH TH PASSED BY T E RESOLUTION N CITY A TORNEY APPROVED: PRESIDENT - -, City.of TukVllil~ 6200 Southcenter BoiJlevara' Tukwila Washington 98188 ATTN: CITY CLERK If/i:1:1T _ ~~...... -.. ___ ~ ,......:::::::::__ _ _.~ ._.:_~_ ~-"1LI:' ~\ L __ '~~"~ __ cc ___ ,~_ tq'9-. ~', :t~!fJ~1;'"~:~::-Z~ ~ ~.~:>~:f:; .::-,,_ (I) • PM ("."'). (' .-.o":'~J . .'fl::., uvlkj~J.-,;:,,, ... ~ •• --.,.,. -( j '," -. -..-, , ,..:,: '" -:..'" FEB~-SZ:~· -. I?'_~ -~,.. I '5 rrg ,1 • .r,-~ .::; r/'! . r-~. ? < _" L" .~ /_'" __ ' , ... ;. ,;~.~~~,.;.; --:;~."f .. ,:",,;: • ~,,!.?>.a2,-... ~ tV4~\~;/ ': --;~~-::1~ _ ~ CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton. WA 98055 11,1"1,, 1,11,",1,1, ,1,1,"11, I . - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County . 906 Smith Thwer Seattle, Washington 98104 Thlephone (206) 344-4196 January 12, 1987 TO: STEVE MUNSON, Asst. Planner Renton's Policy Dev. Division FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary IN RE: CLOSING LETTER vfILE NO 1402 -CITIES OF TUKWILA AND RENTON: . '---Proposed Boundary Adjustments (Northern Portion) l,;i'l ,. ut' RENTON JAN 13 1987 POLICY DEVElOPMI"NT nFP'T' You have been advised that the above file was formally filed effective as of 9-19-86 The Board has received no request for review and has not itself chosen to Invoke jurisdiction. Therefore, the 60-day filing period having now elapsed, this notice Is hereby deemed approved as of November 18. 1986 The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are changes by the Council, the Board may be required to review the action at that time. When the proposal Is ready for finalization, It wi11 be necessary that you file one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with the Office of the Clerk of the· Council, Room 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle, Washington 98104, together with a copy of this letter. GBM/pr CC: Ref. 9.30 Office of the Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Moc!ulsk! K.C. Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock K.C. Dept. of Planning & Community Development, ATTN: Mr. Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections I I I I I I I I i I ~ ,j I !J Washington State Boundrry Review Board , For King County '. 906 Smith 7bwer Seattle, Washington 98104 Thiepi10ne (206) 344-4196 January 12. 1987 TO: STEVE ~{UNSON. Asst. Planner. Policy Development t,;,., I Ufo' RENTON JAN 13 1987 Division. City of Renton FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN. Executive' Secretary IN RE: CLOSING LETTER POlley DEVElOPMem n" .... vP ILE NO. 1!Ql. -CITY OF TUKWILA <& RENTON -proposed Boundary Adjustment (Southern Portion) You have been advised that the above file was formally flied effective as of September 12. 1986 The Board has received no request for review and has not itself chosen to Invoke jurisdiction. Therefore. the 60-day filing period having now elapsed. this notice is hereby deemed approved as of November 14,'1986 The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are changes by the Council. the Board may be required to review the action at that time. When the proposal Is ready for finalization. It will be necessary that you file one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with the Office of the Clerk of the Council. Room 402 King County Courthouse. Seattle. Washington 98104. together with a copy of this letter. GBM/pr CC: Ref. 9.30 Office of the Clerk of the CounCil. ATTN: Helene Moclulskl K.C. Dept. of Public Works. ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. Dept. of Assessments. ATTN: Diane Murdock K.C. Dept. of Planning &'z Community Development. ATTN: Mr. Tim Krause. SEPA Coordinator K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections TO: FROM: IN RE: - Washington State BoundarY Review Board For King County 906 Smith Thwer Seattle, Washington 98104 ThZephone (206) 344-4196 January 12. 1987 STEVE MUNSON. Asst. Planner Renton's Policy Dev. Division' G. BRICE MARTIN. Executive Secretary CLOSING LETTER FILE NO. 1402 -CITIES OF TUKWILA AND RENTON: Proposed Boundary Adjustments (Northern Portion) l,;i"l f Ur RENTON JAN 13 1987 POLICY OEVElOPM~NT nFpT You have been advised' that the above file was formally filed effective as of 9-19-86 The Board has received no request for review and has not Itself chosen to Invoke jurisdiction. Therefore. the 60-day filing period having now elapsed. this notice is hereby deemed approved as of Noyember 18. 1986 The proposal could be subject to approval by the' County Council. If there are changes by the Council. the Board may be required to review the action at that time. When the proposal is ready for finalization. it will be necessary that you file one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with the Office of the Clerk of the' Council. Room 402 King County Courthouse. Seattle. Washington 98104. together with a copy of this letter. GBM/pr CC: Ref. 9.30 Office of the Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Moclulskl K.C. Dept. of Public Works. ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. Dept. of Assessments. ATTN: Diane Murdock K.C. Dept. of Planning ~ Community Development, ATTN: Mr. Tim Krause. SEPA Coordinator K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections p January 12. 1987 Annexation: Renton- Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Appointment: Municipal Arts Commission Appointment: Police/Fire Civil Service Commission Vouchers ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Parks: Renton Area Youth Symphony Garbage: Cedar Hills Agreement, King County & Suburban Cities Martin Luther King Jr. Parks: Community Center Renton City CounciI Minutes Page 16 Councilwoman Mathews requested that reference to Fire and Building Codes be added to Section 4.C. on page 11-12, Spacing Between BuiIdings. Mayor Shinpoch concurred in the request. Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry regarding CounciI's authority in determining phasing of PUD development, City Attorney Warren explained that upon review of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the entire phased development, CounciI has the authority to change the order of phasing if it serves the public benefit. Also, each phase must stand on its own, and a prominent sign describing proposed development would be required on site. Mr. Warren also indicated that development of an incompatible use adjacent to an approved PUD would not warrant changing the Council's position on a previously approved PUD unless the PUD had been abandoned. Responding to inquiry regarding density bonuses allowed for open space, storm drainage, etc., Mr. Springer cited Section 4-2709, page 8, which states that in no case shall the number of dwelling units permitted on a site exceed the maximum permitted density of the underlying zoning of the site. -MOTION CARRIED. An ordinance was read annexing certain territory to the City of Renton, for Renton-TukwiIa Boundary Adjustment. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. City Attorney Warren clarified that the ordinance will take effect 30 days after adoption of Resolution #2667 (adopted 1/5/87) if no appeals are filed. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Sharon Newbury, 16902 -1615t Avenue SE, (Fairwood) Renton, to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term from 01/01/87 throu8h 12/31/80. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Darrell Igelmund, 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard N., Renton, for a six-year term from 01/01/87 through 12/31/92. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 19519 through 19841 in the amount of $1,207,371.76, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 19523-19526 machine voided. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. One hundred and seventy-five people attended the first of three Renton Area Youth Symphonies at Carco Theater on Sunday, January I lth, sponsored by Parks Department and Citizens Advisory Committee. King County Councilwoman Lois North, chair of King Subregional Committee on Solid Waste, (committee of PSCOG) has appointed CounciIwoman Kathy Keolker to chair a subcommittee to develop a model agreement between cities and the County concerning the use of Cedar Hills. The subcommittee will consist of technical people and elected officials; and each city will contribute technical staff. Renton's contribution will be legal review of the draft agreement by the City Attorney upon completion. Political and civic leaders have been invited to a ceremony on January 18, 1987, to honor Martin Luther King Jr. The ceremony, sponsored by private citizens appointed by Governor Booth Gardner, will be held at St. Anthony's. Church next Sunday evening at 6:00 p.m. There will be a Park Board meeting on January 13, 1987, at 4:30 p.m. at Carco Theater to accept public input on the Community Center. · , ~ .... ORDINANCES WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 12, 1987 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance Regulating Parking of Commercial Vehicles The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: PUD Ordinance and Summary Ordinance Renton~Tukwila Boundary Adjustment -Annexing Certain Territory to the Ci ty of Renton APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION (Referred 1/5/87) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Sharon Newbury, 16902 -161st Ave. SE, Renton 98058, to the Municipal ',( Arts Commission for a three-year term from 1-1-87 through 12-31-89. Jr~~ APPOINTMENT TO POLICE/CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (Referred 1/5/87) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Darrell Igelmund, 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard N., Renton, for a six-year term from 1-1-87 through 12-31-92. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 19519 through No. 19841 in the amount of $1,207,371.76. Chair J THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • RENTON, WASH. 98056 MAXINE E. MOTOR, CITY CLERK • Ce06) 235-250 I January 8, 1987 Office of the Clerk of the Council Room 403, King County Courthouse Seattle, WA 98104 Re: City of Renton Resolution No. 2667 Annexing Property from City of Tukwila Dear Sir: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of January 5, 1987, adopted Resolution' No: 2667 establishing the 30 day protest period for property owners of the area to be annexed in a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries. The protest period will expire February 4, 1987, 12:01 a.m. A certified copy of the resolution is filed with ,you in accordance with legal requirements. Please do 'not hesitate to contact this office if you have any further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Original signed by Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk, cc: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Thom~s Trimm, CCH,mcil President· Lawrence Springer, policy Development Director THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • RENTON. WASH. 98055 MAXINE E. MOTOR. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I January B, 19B7 Tukwila City Council 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 9BlBB Subject: City of Renton Resolution No. 2667 Annexation of Area from city of Tukwila Dear Council Members: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of January 5, 19B7, adopted Resolution No. 2667 establishing the 30-day protest period for property owners within the area to be' annexed in a common effo'rt by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries. The ' protest period will expire February 4, 1987, 12:01 a,m. A certified copy of the resolution is filed with you in accordance, with , legal requirements. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any' further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor' Thomas Trimm, Council President Lawrence Springer, Policy Development Director January S. 1987 Monday. 8:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE PRESS APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES PUBLIC HEARING Annexation: Resolution #2667 Annexation: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment AUDIENCE COMMENT Advancement to Ways and Means Committee Report Ways and Means Committee Streets: Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting MINUTES Municipal Building Council Chambers Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. THOMAS W. TRIMM. Council President; EARL CLYMER. ROBERT J. HUGHES. KATHY A. KEOLKER, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN. City Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS. Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR. City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER. Policy Development Director; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON. Police Department . Tony Davis. Valley Daily News Correction noted on page 179. paragraph eight, line two, Committee on Committees assignments: change Mathews to Trimm. MOVED BY MATHEWS. SECONDED BY CLYMER. COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF DECEMBER 22. 1986, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published. and mailed in accordance with State and local laws. Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to consider the Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment and reciprocal annexation in accordance with RCW 35.10.217. Referring to a vicinity map, Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated areas proposed for inclusion in each jurisdiction in order to straighten the boundary lines of both cities. He noted that Resolution 2651, adopted by the City Council on July 7. 1986. established intent to annex certain areas from the City of Tukwila and requested Tukwila to annex certain areas currently within the City limits of Renton. The King County Boundary Review Board approved the annexations on November II and 18. 1986. by not invoking jurisdiction; and, unless 60% of the owners of property in the area to be exchanged protest the proposal within 30 days of adoption of legislation by both cities this date. a final annexation ordinance will be adopted by the Renton City Council on February 16, 1987. Mr. Springer noted that the City of Tukwila is holding a concurrent public hearing on the same matter this date. Since there was no audience or Council comment. it was MOVED BY MA THEWS. SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. A resolution was read annexing certain real property to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila as part of a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundaries, such resolution to take effect upon adoPtion of an ordinance by the City of Renton unless 60% of the affected property owners file a written appeal within 30 days after adoption of the resolution. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE; MATTER REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Edwin Gillespie, 609 Jefferson NE, Renton, requested advancement to Ways and Means Committee report regarding Commercial Vehicle Parking Ordinance. MOVED BY HUGHES. SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3, Title X (Traffic) of City Code by adding a section regulating the parking of commercial vehicles and vehicles over 12,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. Speaking in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Mr. Gillespie objected to restriction of recreational vehicle parking on City streets. City Attorney CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2667 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF RENTON FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1008 of the City of Tukwila requested that the City of Renton annex certain real property located in the City of Tukwila as part of a common effort by Renton and Tukwila to simplify their common boundariesl and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2651 of the City of Renton declared the City of Renton's willingness to accept such annexation upon certain conditions and requested that the City of Tukwila annex certain property located within the City of Renton as a reciprocal measure designed to simplify the common boundary I and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila entered into an interlocal agreement providing for shared responsibilities with respect to the areas to be annexed by both citiesl and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board has reviewed the proposed annexations and boundary change and has approved the same; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.10.217 and upon proper notice, a public hearing was held on the proposed annexation before the City Council of the City of Renton on __ ~J=an~u=a=ry~~5~. ________ , 198~, at which all persons who were interested in the annexation were allowed to participate I and WHEREAS, after such public hearing, the City Council of the City of Renton has determined to annex the area, NOW, THEREFORE -1- .- RESOLUTION NO. 2667 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Annexation of Area from Tukwila. Pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, the real property previously located in the City of Tukwila and legally described on Exhibits A and B attached hereto and incorporated hereby by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby are annexed to and made a part of the City of Renton. SECTION II: Duties of City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby , directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Tukwila City council and the King County Council. SECTION III: Effective Date: This Resolution, and the annexation accomplished hereby, shall take effect and be in full force upon adoption by the City Council of the City of Renton of an annexation ordinance, unless the owners of property in the area annexed by this Resolution, equal in value to 60% or more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area, file a written protest with the City Council of the City of Renton, within 30 days after adoption of this Resolution. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of January , 1981- Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of January , 1982.... Barbara Y. Sh1npoch, Mayor -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2667 EXHIBIT B LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown In F;lgure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE N,W and NE 1/4' 5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE1I4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 OJJO .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 " RESOLUTION NO. 2667 EXHIBIT A LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FRDM RENTON The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown In Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE '.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 6' 2.'5 '2 0.27 28 '.85 , 7 MOe 4.55 NW' 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 '8 1.84 ..J!....ll 8 MOe (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) T.Os 4' 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 2' 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 ~ 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.'7 20 2.14 " '.69 17 5.9' '.01 2' (portion) 10.4' 24 (portion) ~ 44.10 22 '.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. '6. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 97 '.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.8' 4' 0.10 '7 0.17 .. '8 0.14 '9 0.14 5' 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.'2 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 , 1.7 0.12 '5 2.84 '4 5.54 '6 '.09 TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 ------:--:-----:-:---:-:--:-;----:-------------RESOLUTION NO. 2667 • ·sure 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila , N o &000' "~ ... "I , TIC • I . . 'ON _J_AN.,-,UA...,..RY_~,...,..: 1_98_7_. __ I AT ...... :'-_~:i , :' . " ~ I \,: .1 . ::,:)~ .j RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS! . I , ;",' , ~ 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH , I i. ! • CONSIDERATION OF THERENTON~TUKWILA BOUNDARY .ADJUSTMENT . I I .. , .. TO STRAI GHTEN 1 EXI STI NG IRREGULAR BOUNDARI ES BETWEEN THE 1. I T~O CITIES. I MAPS A~D LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS CAN BE OBTAINED.: I • I~ THE OFFIC~ OF THE CITY CLERK •. , ! " 'Ii , · ! i i , · I , i , ! · I i · : · i I STATE OF WASHINGTON) 55. COUNTY OF KING ) CERTIFICATION , , I , I ! I ! I , .' ; , I .' I , .; .. i :1. I I : I : I,,' . : I. .' i I,. .,.!. i' . :1, , .·1 • "r "I . , ~I . '" i'l ", '. t· H 1 'j! :1 I • '; :.[ .'" . , .. ~il' . . . .~, , . " ; .: .' I. ·1' .:' . ,1\ "1 . ! ]; 1 L e.sl/e L. -PhIJ(j:u HEREBY CERTI FY THAT )2 cOP I ES OF THE ABOVE NOT I CE WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE 6R:MORE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND TWO COPIES WERE POSTED AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVENUE S., RENTON, WA ON DATE OF December 22 J9ML , NOI4IrJ Publit In ~:~Ie of Waehill""a. ftlldinll' .t ; "-I , . J 1 I . , : ' . , L ~ I . I . , , I , , i I I . 1 j , ! .. I . i;' i I , I I I" , . , , I' , .. " ,. I : I I il , :. I .\ i·,· I i I. ' . j I I ,i r I , 'I ,., I· .! [. I" .. 1 \ II \ I! .,1 I J . I ., .. i' .' "' I " I ,:: 'I ,-' Iii . i . : .. i J . :·1 '! i· I i I:. i +i·' : "] 1 !. !.I·:· I'! .., . I . . I, "j Ii; . ! • ~ ~'. I • -,' 1 .. ,,:·1 I ' ! J . . i " . ... ., -' r '1-1 , I : j ! ! If· ,~ 'r'" -, .• I' :-........ -. Ai-i' i~ .\ '. -....• ! i-': :., .. ; .. r. ';-'1' I··~: . I , \! I " Ii' I ". ,. ,'" .. , ..... , .. T "I ........ ·1 "1''':--' .--.+ , . , .. ; .. ·1 .1 . J ::.. " .. : .. j.! II i! , .' , ! I ' I , . : • ! ! I ,: I ~ I I '. .. j'" ';'~-i' r "--1'" '1 , "-. .. .. , , I"." 1 .•.. -"""1 ' .~ " "I ""~'('" T . ~ .. ,-! i '~.: ·1·: "'jl ... ," --J ; ...... " , " "I .. ; :i .... · .. , .... r ,. '. . II ,\.; .. . , ! i I I I , , ., . i i r _ j. . " _ !... ,. .J. i ; J . I . , ' , , • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJoie ,being first duly sworn on oath states that helshe is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News JournaL-, Daily Record Chroniclel, Daily Globe News __ , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on December 21, 1986 R1997 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sumof$23.75 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of Dec 19~. '. ~ ...... Public Notice N two cities. House Bill 1386 of the 1986 y Public for the State of Washington, Washington Legislature provides that the proposed adlustment will become law In residing at Federal Way, both cities, unless the owners of property in VN #87 Revised 10184 King County, Washington. the area to be exchanged equal In value to I ==!.!Ij-~~-_______ J sixty (60) percent or more of the assessed CITY OF RENTON valuation of the property In the area protest NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING the proposal In writing to the legislative BY body (City Council) within thirty (30) days of RENTON CITY COUNCIL the adoption of the ordinance accepting the I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the exchange. Maps and legal descriptions Renton City Council has fixed the 5th day g',:~~ obtained in the Office of the City of January, 1987, at 8:00 p.m. In the A , Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal . ny and all interested persons Bre II Building. 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. InVited tq be present to voice approval Washington, BS the time and place for a disapproval or opinions on SOme. ' I public hearing to consider the following: CITY OF RENTON I Renton .. TukWila Boundary Adjustment Maxine E. Motor for the J;>urpose of straightening irregular P bf City Clerk .' boundanes presentfu existing belWeen the U Ished In the Valley Dally News , December 21, 1986 A1997. I CITY OF RENTON NOT! CE OF PUBLI C HEAR I NG BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Counci I has fixed the 5th day of __ J:::;a:::;n:::;u:::;a.:.r:..y _______ " 19 U: --- at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustme~t for the purpose of straightening irregular boundaries presently existing between the two cities. House Bill 1386 of the 1986 Washington Legislature provides that' the proposed adjustment will,become law in both cities, unless the owners of property in the area to be exchanged equal in value to sixty (60) percent or .. more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area protest the -proposal in writing to the legislative body (City Council) within thirty (30) days of the adoption of the ordinance accepting the exchange. Maps and legal descriptions may be obtained in the Office of the City Clerk .. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. DATE OF PUBLiCATION: 12/21/86 , CITY OF RENTON ~~/7l~ Maxine E. Motor City Clerk ·:.-' . \ CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys December 15, 1986 TO: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner FROM: Daniel Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney RE: Renton-Tukwila Reciprocal Annexation 'r have your Memorandum of December 5, 1986 for reply. We have reviewed the interaction of Chapter 253, Laws of 1986 (HB 1386) and RCW 35A.14.l40. We are of the opinion that the provisions for a reciprocal annexation as contained in RCW 35.10.217 are in some measure inconsistent with the provisions for annexation by a municipal code city such as the City of Renton. It is clear that the legislature intended for a reciprocal annexation to become effective upon the adoption of the second resolution. RCW 35.10.217. However, the provisions for annexation by a code city clearly require that the petition be approved by ordinance. RCW 3SA.14.l40. In an attempt to construe these sections together so as to cover both procedures, we would propose that the City of Renton proceed in the following manner: January 5, 1987 Both cities to adopt the second resolution approving the reciprocal annexation and commencing the 30 day protest period. February 4, 1987 The 30 day protest period expires. February 9, 1987 City of Renton to consider on first reading the annexation ordinance. February 16,1987 City of Renton to enact on second reading the annexation ordinance providing for an effective date of 12:01 A.M. on April 1, 1987, which is more than 30 days after the enactment of the ordinance. April 1, 1987 Annexation becomes effective at 12:01 A.M • . Post Office Box 626 -100 S 2nd Street -Renton. Washin2ton 98057 -(206) 255-8678 Steve Munson Page 2 December 15, 1986 We have enclosed for your information and review our dr.afts of the Resolution concurring in the annexation. This Resolution is patterned after the Tukwila counterpart. We anticipate this Resolution would be adopted by the Council on January 5, 1987. We have also enclosed to you a draft of the annexation ordinance which would be considered by the Council on February 9, 1987 and adopted on February 16, 1987. Copies of these documents as well as this Memorandum have also been forwarded to James Haney for his review and comment on behalf of the ,City of Tukwila. Please call if you have any. questions. DK:nd Encl. cc: Mayor Larry Springer Maxine E. Motor Council President James Haney" ..:"" .~ . " '" ," " , ,"' ?(r ',\ r ::,. " .. Daniel Kellogg • ( .'.~ . pecember 15. 1986 Anl'p.xation: Container Cor:)oc,,,tion of America I 0% Annexation &. Rezone CONSENT AGENDA Claim: Peck, CL-67-86 CAG: 080-86, Puget/Talbot/SR-515 Widening, Signalization &. Channelization Boundary Ad justment: Tukwila/Renton Repton City Council Minute~ Page 167 Following discussion, it was MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 10% PETITION AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 75% PETITION. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO CONCUR IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL INSTRUCT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO INCLUDE THE STRIP OF PROPERTY AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE TO ENABLE STRAIGHTENING OF THE CITY BOUNDARY. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public meeting to consider the Container Corporation of America 10% Annexation Petition and Rezone. The proposal, consisting of 45.08 acres located along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000 block, includes a concurrent rezone to M-P, manufacturing park, zone to allow installation of sanitary sewer service to the subject site for future development. The rezone application will be reviewed initially by the Hearing Examiner since the applicant is requesting a more intensive zoning classification than R-I or G-I. Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the subject site, reviewed staff recommendations, and suggested that a public hearing to consider the 75% Annexation Petition and Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the rezone be set on February 9, 1986. He recommended that Council accept the 10% annexation petition, require simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the property, and require the property to assume its proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness. Upon inquiry, Mr. Springer described location and ownership of buildings and other amenities on the subject site, and designated location of proposed boundary betweern cities of Renton and Tukwila following completion of annexation procedures by both cities. He also noted that King County zoning is heavy manufacturing for the entire site, and property to the east is part of the Oakesdale Avenue Local Improvement District. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AND ACCEPT THE 10% ANNEXATION PETITION, REQUIRE SIMULTANEOUS ADOPTION OF ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY, REQUIRE THE PROPERTY TO ASSUME ITS PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 75% ANNEXATION PETITION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE 75% ANNEXATION PETITION AND REZONE ON FEBRUARY 9,1986. CARRIED. Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, items 6.c. and 6.d. were removed for separate consideration. Claim for damages in the amount of $691.84 filed by Mary C. Peck, 4106 NE 24th, Renton, for plumbing expenses allegedly incurred due to plugged City water line (11/25/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. City Clerk reported bid opening 12/3/86 for South Puget Drive/Talbot Road South/SR-515 Widening, Signalization and Channelization project; two bids received; Engineer's estimate: $100,803.92. Refer to Transportation Committee. Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set to consider the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment. Council concur and set hearing for January 5, 1987. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. ", . ! For.Use·By City Clerk's Office Only A. I. # ,. e-. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comrn. __ ~P~o~l~i~c~y~D~e~v~e~l~o~p=me~n~t~ For Agenda Of __ -r.::D~e~c~e:;:mb=e;:;r::-=1,.:5";',...::1.:.9.::8.::6 ___ _ (Meeting Datel Staff Contact __ -r~~rSt_e_v_e __ M~u_n_s_o_n ________ __ (Name) SUBJECT: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Exhibits: (Legal Descr., Maps, Etc.)Attach A. ____ Ma~P_s ______________________ __ B. ____________ _ C. ____________ ---.. COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Set a public hearing date for January 5, 1986. FISCAL IMPACT: -0- Expenditure Required $ Amount Budgeted $ Agenda Status: Consent ___________________ _ Publ ic Hearing __________ _ Correspondence ______________ __ Ord i nance/Res'o I ut i on. _______ __ Old Buslness __________ _ New Buslness, ________________ __ Study Sesslon, _________ __ Other ________________ ~ __ __ Approva I: Lega I Dept. Yes No Finance Dept. Yes ___ No. N/A_ N/A __ . __ Other Clearance __________________ __ Approprlatlon- Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background Information. prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages If necessary.) The requested action is to set a public hearing date of January 5, 1987, to adopt the annexing resolutions (by ordinance) previously passed by the Cities of Renton and Tukwila which straighten the irregular boundaries presently existing between the two communities. House Bill 1386 of the 1986 Washington legislative session provides for this public hearing and the proposed adjustment will become law in both cities, unless the owners of property in the area to be exch.anged equal in value to sixty (60) percent or more of the assessed valuation of the property in the area protest the proposal in writing to the legislative body (City Council) within thirty (30) days of the adoption of the ordinance accepting the exchange •. The City of Tukwila will be conducting a similar public hearing on the same date. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COpy TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. , "', . ~TON·iV~W..Jr -fb)~ ~N .... ADJ~SNT ~MAP' l' N4qf~1 --...~ ,- "'", ; " J:; ;! -. ',: ~ ! ;j -, ~ " .'; ') , " '~ ~ ~ ~ !! " ,.~ i ~,' f~ ~1 'f .. ~;~ i.:). L~ ~ ' .. ' <, :,(i ,> ." l"; ;;; ~ ~t [~ d! ',}: c{i 1.;" "1. ~.;.; it; !~: 11" F" ~-;, '(. V·: ~Jl -,' " ~" ,,' ;-:., ,~:~ " :;~. "" . 11 ·f ry;-I' I VI....,· IV F\W It '/\ ., f!t)UNDi,,'f:' UNE.. .. Lands to Renton ADJL>5~T lONGACRES Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton -1--==:::::=== :+: N o 2000· 1/1.1/8(. "NORTHERN" PORTION • r Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwi 1 a o 11J.118~ . TO: FROM: IN RE: Washington State Bounda1ry Review Board For King County King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344-4196 November 26, 1986 . . REBECCA FOX . CITY OF ·TUKWILA G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary CLOSING LETTER FILE NO. 140l. & 140i . CITY OF TUKWILA ... Proposed Boundary.Adjustment 'with Renton (Northern & Southern portions) You have been advised .that the above file was formally filed effective as of Sept. 19 & Sept 12, ·1986 The Board has received no request for review and has not itself chosen to invoke jurisdiction. Therefore, the 60-day filing period having now elapsed, this notice Is hereby deemed approved as of Nov. 18 & Nov.ll, 1986 The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are changes by the Council, the Board may be required to review the action at that time. When the proposal Is ready for finalization, it will be necessary that you file one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle, . Washington 98104, together with a copy of this letter. GBM/pr CC: Office of the Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski K.C. Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock K.C. Dept. of Planning a Community Development, ATTN: Mr. Keith Artz, SEPA Coordinator K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections E-911 Program, ATTN: Mark Peterson 1--:-=-----1 CITV OIF tclEN701\1j :UAIC 8' 198t " ~c:~~~~n~:;~W --~.~ - . . . , . CAG 046-86 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL ANNEXATIONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, herei nafter referred to as "Tukwi 1 a ", and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 ,which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit 8 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and . WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. ~ ,which calls for certain property currently located wi~enton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit B to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. 3. S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So lSOth Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an SO% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P-l Channel. The P-l Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/So lSOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-lSl),·formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Ut i1 it i es. Both part i es understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within .the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. S. SR-lSl. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-lS1 between S. W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. . • I Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DATED this //~ day of a.u.i1-«.t~, 1986. CITY OF RENTON A L. AD, A R t>ax1 &><~. ~'RL~~c~ BARBARA Y OSHlPOCH, MAOR ~tff.~ MAXINE E. MOTOR, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTO ~::::~>:::IA I .' I EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24 Twn. 23 RQe. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 .. 0.91 8 MOC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 S.W 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 . 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 l3 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 I 5.54 36 3.09 I TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 • 1--:=:.:::::== Figure 1 Renton-Tukwil-qoundary Adjustment Map ot .fetted Areas Lands to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila \. aooo' o .. J ." EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 , \ -- Figure 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map ( Jfected Areas Lands to Renton :;.; Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila N o aooo' EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions . " " ... \ ~.' ;~:..' ........ ':~': .. : .. . . ~, .. I .' ! ----.. • OF R~<'V ~.:.. ,» iJ ,(f~ ~ z -1, C'l -~ ~ -.,. '" 0-2 f<,~ "Il"ED SEP~\:.~'O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 7, 1986 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055. TO: Renton City Council Ways and Means Committee FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Financial Consequences of RentonlTukwila Boundary Adjustment At a recent Council meeting, Councilman Earl Clymer expressed concern about the financial consequences of loss of sales tax revenue of the proposed Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment. The Pollcy Development Department was requested to research the matter, and we have compiled a data sheet summarizing the revenues and costs involved in the exchange. The table lists the various categories of revenues and individual costs involved and compares the existing situation with the results of an approved boundary change on an immediate basis and five years in the future. A footnote section follows explaining the sheet and how the figures were compiled. The 114.0 I acres transferring from Renton to Tukwila have been examined for development potential and consequences. In so doing, the analysis has concentrated on the undeveloped 98. n acres of Burlington Northern land located east of the Green River and north of S.W. 43rd Street (see attached map). For comparison purposes, it is assumed that (based upon Renton's Comprehensive Plan and future zoning) the properties will develop in a similar office use fashion as those of the Austin Company holdings located at the southwest corner of the East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street and the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. The following comparisons describe the current and proposed activity at the East Valley/S.W. 16th site and the development potential of the Burlington Northern property: A. Austin Company (Under Construction, Under Review) I) Building Permit Valuation (one 4-story office building on 7.4 acres) of $7,802,775 under construction. 2) An identical structure to (I) of 140,000 square feet and four stories on 7 acres under review (foundation permit issued). 3) Two structures similar to (I) and (2) adjacent to the south are planned. (Building & Zoning Department, March 1986). Renton City Council -Wa~ ,d Means Committee July 7, 1986 Page 2 B. Burlington Northern (Potential Based Upon" A" Comparison I) Available Land: 98,.73 acres 2) Land Designated Greenbelt: 36.87 acres 3) Developable Land: 61.86 acres This property is designated Commercial and Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option (Industry) on the Comprehensive Plan. 4) Using a development scenario similar to "A" and with similar valuation (approximately $7.8 million/building) a total of 9 buildings could realistically be constructed. This would result in a potential building permit valuation of $70,200,000. By collecting a I % sales tax on this amount, revenues totalling $702,000 could be realized. Additional revenues from retail sales (amounts depend upon specific future uses) will also be realized from, associated and spin-off uses constructed to service employees of these offices. COST/BENEFIT SUMMARY -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment - Present Post B.L.A. 5th Year REVENUES Property Taxes Sales Taxes Utility Taxes Real Estate Excise Tax Business Licenses Intangible -Impact Mitigation Subtotal COSTS W 27th Stl al Strander Blvd. .... .Q SW 43rd Stl .... 0-Overcrossing ~ Eo! -I Channel Construction, al o and M .... .Q .... 0-{police ~ Fire .j.J .:: H Subtotal $ 44,454 112,062 20,OOO(f) 0 3,893 Future $ 180,409 $1,400,000 700,000 0 Increasing Increasing $2,100,000 ($1,919,591) $ 8,903(a) $ 243,861(g) 0 702,OOO(b) 0 I 57,437(c) 0 200,OOO(d) 0 4,995(e) Future Future $ 8,903 $1,308,293 $ 700,000 o 350,000 o 300,000 3,000 (O&M) Lower Lower Lower Lower $1,350,000 + $ 3,000 + Police, Fire Police, Fire ($1,341,097) $1,305,293 Renton City Council -Wa\ nd Means Committee July 7,1986 Page :5 FOOTNOTES (a) Assumes a levy rate of :5.09176/$1000. (b) This figure represents the total sales tax revenue on future construction. This is based upon construction of approximately 9 office buildings similar to existing structures located at the southwest corner of S.W. 16th Street and East Valley Road. This figure represents I % of the building permit valuation ($70,200,000) projected for the 9 buildings based upon the· similar projects of Austin Company and is a one-time collection only. (c) Utility tax is 5% of the amount paid per year for electricity only. This amount was then doubled for other utilities (gas, cable television, telephone, telegraph). The figure obtained from doubling was then increased 5% per year to determine the fifth year amount. A bill was compiled for a hypothetical structure similar to (b) with information supplied by Puget Sound Power and Light and the tax computation procedure supplied by the City of Renton Finance Director. (d) This value is based upon 1/4 of I % of the value of the sale of the property. The Finance Director suggests this is a conservative estimate. (e) This total is based upon the $565 yearly cost of a City business license (1986) paid by the Austin Company for their office at 800 S. W. 16th Street and construction of similar buildings as noted in (b) above. (f) Estimated by the Finance Director. (g) Revenues are based upon the following assumptions: I. The land will develop similar to Austin Company buildings located at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. 2. The total assessed valuation of the properties as developed will closely parallel that of (I) above ($18.:54 per square foot of property). :5. Based upon I and 2, this yields annual property tax revenues of $24:5,861. 4. A levy of :5.09176 is used. This analysis is supplied for the Council's review and discussion. If additional explanation is desired on the methodology used or further documentation, the staff of the Policy Development and Finance Departments are prepared to respond. We trust that this effort will aid and assist members in evaluating the issue and rendering their decision. SM:wr 1754G \ --I , \ .-.~:~ I I I I /' I I I _~I I G-1 o-p G-I " I " • : . 1IIIi9~-d o. y===" III I ° • , J ~~+ JIW·flIwr ----< ( -! p.! WAll(" ': HO; , • .0 M-P 8 --'-- THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 ~ E MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 'l1 .,. o '?-'91 ,. ",e<cJ 1:0 SEP1~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 28, 1986 TO; Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor MEMORANDUM FROM: Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director RE: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment The Mayors of both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila have expressed interest in conducting a signing ceremony to conclude the agreement adjusting the irregular boundary lines existing between the two cities. Staff from both communities have been negotiating a time and place and tentative agreement has been reached with the manager of Andy's Tukwila Station to conduct the signing at the restaurant on Thursday, August 7, 1986, at 10:00 a.m. Andy's manager, Dennis Sakuma, has requested that an approximate number of those attending be provided to him in order to accom- modate those interested. LMS:SM:wr cc; Department Heads THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR. Margie Wickham Pacific Northwest Bell 300 S.W. Seventh, Room 145 Renton, Washington 98055 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: Annexat ion -Tukwi laiC i ty of Renton Boundary Adjustment The Renton City Counc.it at its regular meeting of July 7, 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establishes the Intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f I na I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any quest ions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEMlnn Enclosure , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E. MOTOR, July 17. 1986 John Klasell Washington State Department of Transportation 6431 Corson Avenue South Seattle. WA 98198 CITY CLERK • (206) 235--250 I Re: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7. 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. Vou will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f ina I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any quest ions. Yours truly. C lTV OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor. CMC Ci ty Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure )<. OF ~' f.,~ , ...... ..... u THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 980~5 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MDTOR. J u I y 1 7, I 986 King County Records & Elections Room 311 King County Administrative Building Seattle, WA 98104 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7, 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establ ishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f ina I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office If you have· any questions. Yours truly,' CITY Of RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Ju I y 17. 1986 Mr. Hank O'Claire Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau 2001 Western Seattle. WA 98104 Re: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. O'Claire: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7. 1986 passed Resolution 2651, This Resolution establ ishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f ina I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions. Yours truly. C lTY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor. CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure '. I OF ~4. , ....... THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, July 17. 1986 Pacific Northwest Bell General Accountant Tax & Regulatory Matters 1600 -7th Avenue. Room 2307 Sea ttl e. WA 98191 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment Dear Sir: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7. 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f ina I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have, any questions. Yours truly. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor. CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, July 17, 1986 Mr. Lon Hurd 3-H Man~gement & Consultants 4517 Cal ifornia SW Seattle, WA 98116 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I Re: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. Hurd: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7, 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are final ized. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any quest ions. Yours truly, C lTY OF RENTON Maxine E, Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure I • , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR. July 17, 1986 Mr. Howard A. Strong Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Puget Building Bellevue. WA 98009 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I He: Annexation -Tukwila/City of Renton Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. Strong: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 7. 1986 passed Resolution 2651. This Resolution establ ishes the intent to annex certain properties and straighten the boundaries between the Cities of Tukwila and Renton. You will be forwarded the Ordinance covering this matter when the procedures are f ina I i zed. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any quest ions. Yours truly. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/nn Enclosure ... 6) CITY OF TUKWI LA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. /00 II A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THE CITY OF RENTON TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, SPECIFYING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH RENTON ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1002 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary I imits the abil ity of .ne respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and' logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, an~ WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would ~larify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff'members of the respective Cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, ,acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA", a Determi nat ion of Non-Significance for a proposed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: -1- " ' , ' .> ' ' I Section 1. Tlje above rec i tals are found to be true and correct. Section 2. The City of Tukwila hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Renton according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW 35.10.217. Section 3. The City of Tukwila is willing ,to and intends to annex certain areas currently lO,cated in the City of Renton and described as follows, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof , ' as if fully set forth. upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Rento~. Section 4. The City of Tukwila formally requests that the City of Renton annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Tukwila and described as follows, "to wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the ceding of such "territory to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwila." Section 5. The City of Tukwila recognizes that there ar,e certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the Ci"ty of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Tukwila intepds to pursue the resolution of these issues by entering into an agreement with the City of Renton containing the following terms and conditions: 1. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both' Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal ~unding ( for this road improvement project. ~ Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain" Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that 'an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely withiri Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If: ' ' federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will '; " negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each" City's sh~re of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. - 2 - .2. S. W. 43rd Street/S. lBOth Street Improvements. l;f a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traff ic safety and capacity, . the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So lBOth Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority' item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that. each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. ' 3. P-l Channel. The P-l Channel is a storm drainage" improvement to' be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel., 4. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton' s share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan'was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed,and that therefore Renton should have no , obligation for dike main'tenance or rehabilitation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/So lBOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwil~. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the' traffic' signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-lBl), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. ' 6. Utili ties. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union, Pacific' Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all. costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service, to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly ~nnexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-lBl. The City of Renton should enter into"an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-lBl between S. W. 43rd Street and 1-405 .. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 8. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. - 3 - • r. " Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entitled "Inter10ca1 Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations" containing the terms and conditions outlined in Section 5 above. Section 7. Resolution No. 1002 of the City of Tukwila, passed by the City Council on April 21, 1986 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this ~~ day of ~ 1986 • . 0 APPROVED: ~~, f&~CIL PRESIDENT ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ~ttrK~~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE F THE CITY ATTO C. FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:' RESOLUTION NO. /~Of? -4- I ' .. i I, , -:. : ~, , ' " , " , , I' ./ i , .\ ! .; ,/ , .. EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1.' ' SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 23 Rae. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 . I I TOTAL PARCEL 27 (oortion) 63 32 ,28 7 MOC 38 ~ MOC (p) 9 MOC (p) 43 50 51 23 6 24 (portion) 21 MOC 22 (oortion) 21 59 20 33 17 23 (portion) 24 (portion) 22 97 57 62 61 11. 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 45 parcels I I ACREAGE 3.62 12.79 2.35 0.27 3.85 4.55 1.84 0.91 2.91 1.14 3.05 2.15 0.B4 0.72 2.16 6.70 2.16 44;10 2.45 2.16 10.47 1.61 0.37 2.14 3.69 5.93 3.01 10.43 5.44 44.10 ' 3.01 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 ' 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 , 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 I 3.09 I I 101.65 I " ' ' , , ,I J , i' , ; "" . , , , ".' ' , , 'j , i ' .. ~ . ! , , " , ",) , 0' ,I II.' i .. " ; I,. " I , " . , "j : . " ,; ; ,," ",1 ! I '. • , , , . ) I,' \', :; , " , , , ' , , " ., 'I .' . , ,', '\. ' .. " ;.1 '. ~,; . , " . , " ;':; i , , . , .• 'I ! 1 .'t; 1· , " EXHIB IT B Lands·to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in· Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHiP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE' SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 42 ' 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11. 79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 , 0330 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 , " ,1., . ',\ ; , . , , , ' : .1 I' .••. , .' rj; ; " ., . '. " , .1 : I: , , '. ;' 1 1~ , , ' , ", '. : , '. , '.~ , "', . 0. 1,"( j .. " ' ,,' , (j; j-! ,f ',' I !; I ; .; : f • . " " ': 1 I, ' '. ,I ' 'r; \ , I ',': . ,', " '.' I ; (, ! t., I ,d [_'I • '. ~I ~ I ,I • J. . , , .. " j , 'l '. ,I': , i ' , " ., , ~ ~ p . ,! , \ ' . ,I I ~ ,', ; , ", I " \ ,.' , I'· , .' " " '" ',I • -I ., , ,I., :~. i· 1-. ,.. re 1 Renton-Tuk. • Boundary Adjustment Map of Affecte4 Ar~as Lands to Renton , . 'I !: . . ; .~ " : , , , , 1 '. t • . I' .i' I, , . ~ LO~R£S =-:. ,,' Lands ~o Tukwila " .: \ '. , ' 1,_ i .. . ~' ' '. , , , • I I ,. .. Lands to Renton I ~'; , .." ·f' .. ,.,," Lands to T~~wil~ N o , ., '1 ; I , , · (I' , I , · " , ! " I , , . ; . . < .. '; . ( • J' t ~, , >', . . ~~oo·. , , '> ," " : I 1,' : , i' l,i' '. " ; j , 1 ;: , , :; t' , , " • /' ,I • '.' I' EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review 'I of all Future Annexation Petitions 'I " .. ! " "" '. I " , " ,( II 1, ., .I .'.]' I' , " i I i 1', " I E T R ,I , l' , , i,i, " , / ;.' :' i "1: : , " i. , , , 'J , .j I , I, I , " . : • I,. I· , I, !. " , 1", , , ! 1 , I , ': . '1 , CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _2_6_51 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON. AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. SPECIFYING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT- WITH TUKWILA ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS. the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the current boundary is difficult for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas. including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail. and WHEREAS. the City of Renton. acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA. a Determination of Non-Significance for a proposed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW 35.1 0.2i7. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW 35.10.217. SECTION III: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. _2_6_51 __ See Exhibit MAM attached hereto and made iI part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the west Valley Highway (sR-i81) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 4:5rd Street and 1-405.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Renton. SECTION IV: The City of Renton is willing to and intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit MBM attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwila. SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these issues by entering into an agreement with the City of Tukwila containing the following terms and conditions: I. strander Boulevard/s.W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by strander Boulevard/s. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement. both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of strander Boulevard/s.W. 27th Street. as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan. and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each City's share of the local costs of the Improvement shall be 50%. 2. S.W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of s. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks Is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S.W. 4:5rd Street/So 180th Street Improvement· In the same manner as the strander Boulevard/s. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support. it Is meant that both Cities will deSignate this road improvement as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding Is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road Improvement shall be 50%. Because the Improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located In said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-I Channel. -2- " , I RESOLUTION NO. 2651 ---- II. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22'111 prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 113rd StreeVS. IBOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the Intersection of S.W. 113fd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBI). formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent. should be assumed In total by the City of Kent. 6. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S.W. 113rd Street, West Valley Highway. the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way .. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall Impose a surcharge upon utili ty users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-IBI. The City of Renton should enter Into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for Improvements to SR-I BI between S.W. 113rd Street and I-liDS. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. B. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference as If set forth In full. SECTION VI: The Mayor Is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entltlted "Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations" containing the terms and conditions outlined In Section 5 above. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. this _.!.7.!::.!th!.-_ day of --,J~u!.:!:l.z.Y _____ ' 19B6. ~~~ Maxine E. Motor. City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of July 19B6. Approved as to form: ~a.-~~~~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney -3- RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT A LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FROM RENTON The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 TOTAL PARCEL 27 (portion) 63 32 28 7 MOe 38 8 MOe (p) 9 MOC (p) 43 50 51 23 6 24 (portion) 21 MOC 22 (portion) 21 59 20 JJ 17 23 (portion) 24 (portion) 22 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 45 parcels ACREAGE 3.62 12.79 2.35 0.27 3.85 4.55 1.84 0.91 2.91 1.14 3.0S 2.15 0.84 0.72 2.16 6.70 2.16 44.10 2.45 2.16 10.47 1.61 0.37 2.14 3.69 5.93 3.01 10.43 5.44 44.10 3.01 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 101.65 . '. RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT B LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be anne)(ed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure I. . SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 1!1.05 NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 1!1 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11. 7!1 0145 .2!1 0155 (portion) 1.2!1 0150 1.4!1 0320 . .28 0330 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 • RESOLUTION NO •. 2651 EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of ~ll Future Annexation Petitions ',., . I .. E T R f ------! .. ::" .. \ I I I oM L '",,,;,;; ~ ........ ~: .' - ... \. , ~ure 1 RESOLUTION NO. ~ Renton-Tuk" " a Boun44ry AdjuS tII!Int Map of Affected Areas to Renton ..... * to Tukwi la Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila N o 1000' ·.". . \ ,,; Julv 7. 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Page 6 Earlington Avenue SW Street vacation. VAC-001-S6 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Earlington Avenue SW and portion of adjacent alleyway as petitioned !Jy Ticor Title Insurance Company. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CASRRIED. Fire Hydrant Ordinance An ordinance was read amending a portion of Chapter 35 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code for the purpose of clarification and reorganization of Fire Hydrant Ordinance. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Site Plan Review Ordinance Amendments An ordimince was read amending portions of Section 4-738 and Section 4-2303 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Code relating to the Site Plan Review Ordinance. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Councilwoman Keolker asked members of Planning and Development Committee to make sure amendments meet original intent of recently adopted Site Plan Ordinance. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption: # -R n w' n .A resolution was read establishingiiiienf to-annexcerfiiin areas-from the City of Tukwila, Washington, and requesting the City of Tukwila to annex certain areas currently within the corporate limits of the City of Renton, specifying the terms and conditions of such annexations authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with Tukwila according to such terms and conditions. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Finance Director Dan Clements reviewed financial consequences of loss of sales tax revenue as a result of boundary adjustment: current revenues of $ISO,409 are projected to be $S,903 immediately after the \. adjustment and $1,308,293 in the fifth year. Costs associated with future roadway improvement projects and emergency services, currently at $2,100,000 are projected to be $1,350,000+ immediately after the adjutment and $3,000+ in the fifth year. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Clements advised that sales tax estimates were based upon anticipated development similar to Austin Company. While no dollar figure was placed on future retail use since specific use is unknown, it is anticipated that some funds will be received from retail or tlie use part of sales and use tax. Responding to Councilman Clymer's previous inquiry regarding whether a 200-foot setback is required from the proposed P-l Channel, Mayor Shinpoch indicated that according to the State Department of Ecology, a Shoreline permit is not necessary, but she was unable to say how close construction would be permitted to the Channel. Councilman Clymer felt this information should be considered prior to approving the boundary adjustment since large setbacks would affect the amount of property available for development. Mr. Clements responded that projections were based upon a 65% development ratio, with 35% deducted for greenbelt. In addition, development standards required by Code would be imposed for any new construction. Councilman Stredicke's comment went unchallenged that trading areas to Tukwila which are currently served by City of Renton utilities would violate established Council policy. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested that his "no" vote be recorded. ReSOlution #2652 -Nelson Place Street vacation, YAC-002-S6 A resolution was read setting a public hearing date on 8/11/86 to consider the vacation of Nelson Place located between the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of -way near S. 153rd and Grady Way petitioned by heirs of Joseph Nielson (Nielson Dairy). MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolutjon #2653 -Federal Fund Allocation for South Grady Way Project A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute documents requesting allocation of Federal Aid Urban Systems funds for South Grady Way -Rainier Avenue South to Lind Avenue South Improvement Project. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS 1-405 "S" Curve Project Environmental Impact Statement Following announcement by Council President Mathews of Committee of the Whole meeting on 7/17/86 to discuss the WSDOT 1-405 ·S· Curve Project, Councilman Stredicke requested the record reflect the date the draft EIS for the 1-405 project was received by the City from the Washington State Department of Transportation. Mayor Shinpoch advised that two copies were received on July 2, 1986, with promises from WSDOT that additional copies will be sent this week to allow review by staff prior to July 24, 1986, WSDOT meeting at the Senior Center (7:30 p.m.). Councilman Stredicke regretted that he will be unable to attend either meeting, and noted his long-standing interest in this matter and concern for residents on Renton Hill who may be displaced by freeway revisions. Responding to - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUly 7. 1986 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Earlington Addition Alley Vacation -Ticor Title Insurance Co. (VAC 001-86) . Fire Hydrant Ordinance Revisions Amending Site Plan Review Ordinance Language The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adopti on: . :,,1 ..--First City Development FPUD 042-85 -Victoria Hills . ("I' Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Resolution and Interlocal Agreement (Mayor and City Clerk Authorized to Sign Agreement) Nelson Place Street Vacation (VAC 002-86) Located between NP Railroad right-of-way on the North and East to the intersection of W Grady Way on the South and West -Sets Publ ic Hearing for August n. 1986. Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute Documents Requesting Allocation of Federal Funds .. ' OF R.~ ~~ 1-.» .... ~.' 0 ~ ~i,+' : <6 -, , - ~ .,' "'0'2 r,,'l- "IrEo SEP~I:."'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 7. 1986 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO, RENTON. WASH. 98055, TO: Renton City Council Ways and Means Committee FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Financial Consequences of Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment At a recent Council meeting. Councilman tarl Clymer expressed concern about the financial consequences of loss of sales tax revenue of the proposed Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment. The Policy Development Department was requested to research the matter. and we have compiled a data sheet summarizing the revenues and costs involved in the exchange. The table lists the various categories of revenues and individual costs involved and compares the "existing situation with the results of an approved boundary change on an immediate basis and five years in the future. A footnote section follows explaining the sheet and how the figures were compiled. The 114.0 I acres transferring from Renton to Tukwila have been examined for development potential and consequences. In so doing. the analysis has concentrated on the undeveloped 98.73 acres of Burlington Northern land located east of the Green River and north of S.W. 43rd Street (see attached map). For comparison purposes. it is assumed that (based upon Renton's Comprehensive Plan and future zoning) the properties will develop in a similar office use fashion as those of the Austin Company holdings located at the southwest corner of the East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street and the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. The following comparisons describe the current ,and proposed activity at the East Valley/S.W. 16th site and the development potential of the Burlington Northern property: A. Austin Company (Under Construction. Under Review) I) Building Permit Valuation (one 4-story office building on 7.4 acres) of $7.802.775 under construction. 2) An identical structure to (1) of 140.000 square feet and four stories on 7 acres under review (foundation permit issued). 3) Two structures similar to (1) and (2) adjacent to the south are planned. (Building & Zoning Department. March 1986). ·, Renton City Council -Way' d Means Committee July 1, 1986 Page 2 B. Burlington Northern (Potential Based Upon" A" Comparison I) Available Land: 98,.73 acres 2) Land Designated Greenbelt: 36.81 acres 3) Developable Land: 61.86 acres This property is designated Commercial and Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option (Industry) on the Comprehensive Plan. 4) Using a development scenario similar to "A" and with similar valuation (approximately $1.8 milllon/building) a total of 9 buildings could realistically be constructed. This would result in a potential building permit valuation of $10,200,000. By collecting a I % sales tax on this amount, revenues totalling $102,000 could be realized. Additional revenues from retail sales (amounts depend upon specific future uses) will also be realized from· associated and spin-off uses constructed to service employees of these offices. COST/BENEFIT SUMMARV . -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment - Present Post B.L.A. 5th Vear REVENUES ., .... .Q .... I Property Taxes Sales Taxes Utility Taxes Real Estate Excise Tax Business Licenses " Intangible -Impact Mitigation Subtotal COSTS W 27th Stl ., Strander Blvd. .... ~ SW 43rd Stl 01 Overcrossing ~ Eo< -I Channel Construction, ., OandM .... ~ {pOlice 0\ ~ Fire ... <:: H Subtotal $ 44,454 112,062 20,OOO(f) 0 3,893 Future $ 180,409 $1,400,000 100,000 0 Increasing Increasing $2,100,000 ($1,919,591) $ 8,903(a) $ 243,861(g) 0 102,OOO(b) 0 I 57,431(c) 0 200,OOO(d) 0 4,995(e) Future Future $ 8,903 $1,308.293 $ 700,000 o 350,000 o 300,000 3,000 (O&M) Lower Lower Lower Lower $1,350,000 + $ 3,000 + Police, Fire Police, Fire ($1,341,097) $1,305,293 Renton City Council -Ways I Means Committee July 7. 1986 Page :5 FOOTNOTES (a) Assumes a levy rate of '.09176/$1000. (b) This figure represents the total sales tax revenue on future construction. This is based upon construction of approximately 9 office buildings similar to existing structures located at the southwest corner of S.W. 16th Street and East Valley Road. This figure represents 1 % of the building permit valuation ($70.200.000) projected for the 9 buildings based upon the similar projects of Austin Company and is a one-time collection only. (c) utility tax is 5% of the amount paid per year for electricity only. This amount was then doubled for other utilities (gas. cable television. telephone. telegraph). The figure obtained from doubling was then increased 5 % per year to determine the fifth year amount. A bill was compiled for a hypothetical structure similar to (b) with information supplied by Puget Sound Power and Light and the tax computation procedure supplied by the City of Renton Finance Director. (d) This value Is based upon 1/4 of 1 % of the value of the sale of the property. The Finance Director suggests this is a conservative estimate. (e) This total Is based upon the $565 yearly cost of a City business license (1986) paid by the Austin Company for their office at 800 S.W. 16th Street and construction of similar buildings as noted in (b) above . . , (f) Estimated by the Finance Director. (g) Revenues are based upon the following assumptions: I. The land will develop similar to Austin Company buildings located at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. 2. The total assessed valuation of the properties as developed will closely parallel that of (I) above ($18.'4 per square foot of property). ,. Based upon I and 2. this yields annual property tax revenues of $243.861. 4. A levy of 3.09176 is used. This analysis is supplied for the Council's review and discussion. If additional explanation is desired on the methodology used or further documentation. the staff of the Policy Development and Finance Departments are prepared to respond. We trust that this effort wlll aid and assist members in evaiuating the issue and rendering their decision. SM:wr 1754G I 1 1 I 1 1 .1 l ~O:-.. : .. 1 I I 1 1 I I I / 1 I I I I _I I 1 ~~ (j)- , I I , I i M-P o-p , : , ' , ' . , ~~~ to- G-1 11 7 s 6 I OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 \~ .,~ '" 0'2 f<-~ "I"~D SEP11:.\J>'O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 1. 1986 TO: Renton City Council Ways and Means Committee FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Financial Consequences of RentonlTukwila Boundary Adjustment At a recent Council meeting. Councilman Earl Clymer expressed 'concern about the financial consequences of loss of sales tax revenue of the proposed Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment. The Policy Development Department was requested to research the matter. and we have compiled a data sheet summarizing the revenues and costs involved in the exchange. The table lists the various categories of revenues and individual costs involved and compares the "existing situation with the results of an approved boundary change on an immediate basis and five years in the future. A footnote section follows explaining the sheet and how the figures were compiled, . The 114.01 acres transferring from Renton to Tukwila have been examined for development potential and consequences. In so doing. the analysis has concentrated on the undeveloped 98.13 acres of Burlington Northern land located east of the Green River and north of S.W. 43rd Street (see attached map). For comparison purposes. it is assumed that (based upon Renton's Comprehensive plan and future zoning) the properties will develop in a similar office use fashion as those of the Austin Company holdings located at the southwest corner of the East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street and the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. The following comparisons describe the current and proposed activity at the East Valley/S.W. 16th site and the development potential of the Burlington Northern property: A. Austin Company (Under Construction. Under Review) I) Building Permit Valuation (one 4-story office building on 1.4 acres) of $1.802.175 under construction. 2) An identical structure to (1) of 140.000 square feet and four stories on 1 acres under review (foundation permit issued). 3) Two structures similar to (1) and (2) adjacent to the south are planned. (Building & Zoning Department. March 19B6). Renton City Council -Way~ j Means Committee July 7. 1986 Page 2 B. Burlington Northern (Potential Based Upon" A" Comparison I) Available Land: 98 •. 7l acres 2) Land Designated Greenbelt: 36.87 acres l) Developable Land: 61.86 acres This property is designated Commercial and Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option (Industry) on the Comprehensive Plan. 4) Using a development scenario similar to "A" and with similar valuation (approximately $7.8 million/building) a total of 9 buildings could realistically be constructed. This would result in a potential building permit valuation of $70.200.000. By collecting a 1 % sales tax on this amount. revenues totalling $702.000 could be realized. Additional revenues from retail sales (amounts depend upon specific future uses) will also be realized from· associated and spin-off uses constructed to service employees of these offices. COST/BENEFIT SUMMARY -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment - Present Post B.L.A. 5th Year REVENUES Property Taxes Sales Taxes Utility Taxes Real Estate Excise Tax Business Licenses " Intangible-Impact Mitigation Subtotal COSTS W 27th Stl Q) Strander Blvd. ... .Q SW 43rd Stl .... 0-Overcrossing ~ 0< -I Channel Construction. Q) o and M ... .Q .... 0-{pOlice ~ Fire ... <! H Subtotal $ 44.454 112.062 20.000(f) 0 3.89l Future $ 180.409 $1.400.000 700.000 0 Increasing Increasing $2.100.000 ($1.919.591) $ 8.90l(a) $ 24l.861(g) 0 702.000(b) 0 157.4l7(c) 0 200.000(d) 0 4.995(e) Future Future $ 8.903 $1.308.293 $ 700.000 o . 350.000 o lOO.OOO 3.000 (O&M) Lower Lower Lower Lower $1.350.000 + $ 3.000 + Police. Fire Police. Fire ($1.341.097) $1.305,293 Renton City Council -Way~ .d Means Committee July 7. 1986 Page 3 FOOTNOTES (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Assumes a levy rate of 3.09176/$1000. This figure represents the total sales tax revenue on future construction. This' is based upon construction of approximately 9 office buildings similar to existing structures located at the southwest corner of S.W. 16th Street and East Valley Road. This figure represents I % of the building permit valuation ($70.200.000) projected for the 9 buildings based upon the similar projects of Austin Company and is a one-time collection only. utility tax Is 5% of the amount paid per year for electricity only. This amount was then doubled for other utilities (gas. cable television. telephone. telegraph). The figure obtained from doubling was then increased 5% per year to determine the fifth year amount. A bill was compiled for a hypothetical structure similar to (b) with information supplied by Puget Sound Power and Light and the tax computation procedure supplied by the City of Renton Finance Director. This value Is based upon 1/4 of I % of the value of the sale of the property. The Finance Director suggests this is a conservative estimate. This total is based upon the $565 yearly cost of a City business license (1986) paid by the Austin Company for their office at 800 S.W. 16th Street and construction of similar buildings as noted In (b) above. (f) Estimated by the Finance Director. (g) Revenues are based upon the following assumptions: I. The land will develop similar to Austin Company buildings located at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. 2. The total assessed valuation of the properties as developed will closely parallel that of (I) above ($18.34 per square foot of property). 3. Based upon I and 2. this yields annual property tax revenues of $243.861. 4. A levy of 3.09176 is used. This analysis is supplied for the Council's review and discussion. If additional explanation is desired on the methodology used or further documentation. the staff of the Policy Development and Finance Departments are prepared to respond. We trust that this effort will aid and assist members in evaluating the issue and rendering their decision . . SM:wr 1754G 2 () w r:I 1 I 1 1 I ! I I 1 ~~ CfJ' ~~~ tP· O-p / 1 1 1 _I ~~~---~-,.-.;:.-----;In-r-T-:==",$~I ~B-1 .J. I G-I " I " II :, · . • I , • : I · : • , ._-. 1 .... ___ 111 + M-P G-1 --,' .; \ p.; \'ALur J HO'~ " I ., OF R!;' 4,). __ 0 Z THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 % 0 " f!.> MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 q, ",. 1, ~ '9", ~ ».'0<'; £;0 SEP~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM June 2}. 1986 TO: Mayor Shinpoch Members. Renton City Council FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: _ Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment -Existing Renton Businesses Transferring to Tukwila As requested at the June 16. 1986. City Council meeting. the Policy Development Department researched the 'above matter and the following list indicates those companies who are retall. retail/wholesale. and wholesale/distributors. The distinctions were applied after examining the list of City business licenses and contacting each by telephone and inquiring of the type of sales conducted. A. RETAIL Leber Ink Co .• Inc. -17200 W. Valley Highway Howard Cooper Corporation -4000 W. Valley Road Ryder Truck Rental -4nO W. Valley Road Fell & Co .• Inc. -4100 W. Valley Road Brass Bell Furniture Clearance Ctr. -4100 W. Valley Road Faygem -4100 W. Valley Road Jantzen Fabric Outlet -4104 W. Valley Road Flower Box Florist -2120 S.W. 43rd St. Andy's Tukwila Station -240B W. Valley Road B. RETAIL/WHOLESALE Northwest Electronics. Inc. -3800 W. Valley Road A America. Inc. -3800 W. Valley Road • ", ·, Mayor Shin posh Members. Renton City Council June 23. 1986 Page 2 C. WHOLESALE/DISTRIBUTORS United Tile -3642 W. Valley Road. Alaskan Cooper & Brass Co. -3650 W. Valley Road Van Oaal Distributors -3700 W. Valley Road Amfac Drug Supply -3800 W. Valley Road. Suite K Washington Amerpet. Inc. -3800 W. Valley Road Carlyle Technical Sales -3800 W. Valley Road. t/B Star Marchinery -4202 W. Valley Road The Andover Company -2120 S.W. 43rd Street Wimer. Harpold. & Associates. PS -2120 S.W. 43rd Street A Y Company -2408 W. Valley Road Riverview Farms -1602 Monster Road S.W. SM: I 74 IG:wr 1531G RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNOARV REVISION INVOLVED LANDOWNERS Landowner/Address Jacob Neilsen 1602 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98055 F. L. Branson. Prop. Dev. Spec. Burlington Northern RR 2100 F i1'9t Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. WA 98104-1105 Union Pacific Corp. P. O. Bo)( 2500 B~oomfield. CO 80020 Manufactu!'e1'9 Mineral Co. 1215 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98005 Puget Sound Power and Light Puget Power Building Bellevue. WA 98004 Jerry and Marlene Ivy 4315 7th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98108 Alaskan Copper Co •• Inc. 17300 West Valley Highway Renton. WA 98005 Relco Investment Co. P. O. Bo)( 88700 Tukwila Br. Seattle. WA 98188 Oregon-Washington RR clo Union Pacific RR P. o. Bo)( 2500 Broomfield. CO 80020 West Valley Assoc. 1313 East Prospect Seattle. WA 98112 David Goodwin P. O. Bo)( 497 Wrangell. AK 99929 Parcel(s) 242:504-27. 63 242304-28 252304-4.6.42.43.22 362304-36 MDC -7 MPC -21 142304-0160 (por). Lot 112. 0145 242304-32 242304-106 252304-50. 51. 23 362304-35 MDC -8 252304-17 252304-20 252304-21. 59 252304-24 362304-34 MDC -9 252304-33 362304-7.8 /.''''.:'--.. , ~'; .' - 2 - Landownerl Address Randall Weitzel 1908 S.W. 4~rd Street Renton. WA 98055 Nancy Gladsjo 21416 S.E. 265th Kent. WA 98031 Leigh Rabel Star Machinery Co. 4202 West Valley Road Renton. WA 98055 Gerard M. Shellan 11 Lummi Key Bellevue. WA 98006 Chi-Tai Chu 44~1 N.E. 2}rd Ct. Renton. WA 98055 Ernest Patty 2120 S.W. 43rd Renton. WA 98055 Wm. E. Roberts 806 S.W. Broadway Portland. OR 97206 Allen and Joan Cullen 3613 61st S.W. Seattle. WA 98116 CG3 905 S.W. 16th Portland. OR 97205 A. Nagy 2963 4th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98134 Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. 1416 Dodge Street Omaha. NB 68179 Black River Quarry 6808 South 140th Seattle. WA 98178 Parcel(s) 362304-9 362304-10. 14. 29 362304-11.61 362304-13 362304-37.43 362304-38. 39. 53 362304-57.97 362304-59 362304-62 MOC -38 142304-0155 (par). 0330 142304-0150.0320 (par) Renton-TI '1 a Boundary Adjustment ~laJ.> -of Affected Areas Lands to Renton • LONGACRES Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton -+- Lands, to Tukwi 1 a o 2.000' .~,", .. , OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 828-tOO S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 88057 256-8818 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY June 20, 1986 TO: Maxine E. Motor, City.Clerk DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FROM: Daniel Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney . RE: Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Resolution and Agreement Dear Maxine: I have reviewed the above captioned Resolution and Interlocal Agreement regarding the reciprocal annexations between the Cities of Renton and Tukwila .. They are approved as to legal form. We are informed by the Public Works Director that the provisions of paragraph 7 of Section V of the Ordinance and paragraph 8 of the Interlocal Agreement will require the City to contribute to the construction of SR-18l, the remaining sum of only $5,000.00. However, since this is a street that is to be entirely within the City of Tukwila, we want the City Council to be aware of this minor financial impact of the agreement as negotiated. There are other portions. of the Agreement. which I find to be ambiguous. However, in view of the difficulty of the negotiations which have brought us to this point, I am not inclined to insist that the City go back to the bargaining table. If the foregoing raises any questions, please feel free to contact me. DK:nd cc: Larry Springer Dick Houghton Mayor Mike Parness v~ . Danie~ logg CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON. AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. SPECIFYING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH TUKWILA ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS. the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the current boundary is difficult for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current Irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective Jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual Interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas. including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail. and WHEREAS. the City of Renton. acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA. a Determination of Non-Significance for a proposed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW 35.10.2 I 7. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW 35.10.217. SECTION III: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR-18J) and the Burlington Northern railroad track!: and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Renton. SECTION IV: The City of Renton is willing to and intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwila. SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these Issues by entering into an agreement with the City of Tukwila containing the following terms and conditions: I. Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement. both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned Improvement of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street. as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan. and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both Jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each City's share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50 %. 2. S.W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the s. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support. it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each cities' share of t.he local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will bE'l located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-J Channel. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocai annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon compietion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 6. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S.W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 8. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. SECTION VI: The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entitlted "Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations" containing the terms and conditions outlined in Section 5 above. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ____ day of 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to forfn: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney -~ f" ",.-. EXHIBIT A LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FROM RENTON The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 TOTAL PARCEL 27 (portion) 63 32 28 7 MOC 38 8 MOC (p) 9 MOC (p) 43 50 51 23 6 24 (portion) 21 MOC 22 (portion) 21 59 20 33 17 23 (portion) 24 (portion) 22 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 45 parcels ACREAGE 3.62 12.79 2.35 0.27 3.85 4.55 1.84 0.91 2.91 1.14 3.05 2.15 0.84 0.72 2.16 6.70 2.16 44.10 2.45 2.16 10.47 1.61 0.37 2.14 3.69 5.93 3.01 10.43 5.44 44.10 3.01 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 101.65 .-~ " 'I, , +. , " ~--......... ~.,.-.. -.~-.,-, ... ,.,-"" -,.:::.,,~ .... -.. -_ ... , Figure 1 Renton-Tu~ "a Boundary Adjustment Ha~ j Affected Areas . ' Lands to Renton =-:. Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila N o aooo' EXHIBIT B LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11. 79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot /12 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 '. i I ... ---_ .. _-----...... -.. --... --...... Figure 1 Renton-Tuk a Boundary Adjustment Map of. Affected Areas Renton *' to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila N o 1000' EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of pll Future Annexation Petitions I MET R P :,",;:.)[f _______ -l_:~ I I I ,;-'------ .. ' \. 0,., . ,W "t";':; "'-~;':.:.. . - I' , ~ 1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL ANNEXA nONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila." and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton." WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter S9.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. , which caHs for certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on E)(hibit A to be anne)(ed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept anne)(ation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on E)(hibit B to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. • which caHs for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on E)(hibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fuHy set forth, to be anne)(ed to Renton and indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept anne)(ation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on E)(hibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fuHy set forth, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutuaHy resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERA nON OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as foHows: I. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the Intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal anne)(ations. This Agreement shaH become effective and shaH bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the anne)(ation of the property described on E)(hibit A to Renton and anne)(ation of the property described on E)(hibit B to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced anne)(ations are not completed, then this Agreement shaH be nuH and void. 2. Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street e)(tension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development, and as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the anne)(ation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shaH be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each City's share of the local costs of the improvement shaH be 50%. 3. S.W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two'Cities shaH support the S.W. 4Srd Street/So 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities wiH designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each City's share of the local costs of said road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the anne)(ation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shaH be left to the discretion of Tukwila. Interlocal Agreement Reg! ng Reciprocal AnneKations • Page 2 4. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage Improvement to be located within that property described on EKhibit A which will be anneKed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at s. W. 43rd Street/So IBOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBJ), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utillties serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S.W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utillties and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utillty users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR-IBJ. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responslbllity for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DA TED this ____ day of _________ , 1986. CITV OF TUKWILA CITV OF RENTON Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor Barbara V. Shinpoch, Mayor Maxine Anderson, City Clerk Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITV A HORNEV CITV A HORNEV James E. Haney Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MI.LL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 z CO & ~"b ~.,. '9"''' ..,.'?:>'<> Ii:O SEP11> BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM June 17. 1~86 TO: Dan Clements. Finance Director FROM: Steve Munson. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: List of E)(isting Businesses -Transferring to Tukwila Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment - A. SW 25-2:5-4 Leber Ink Co. Inc. -17200 W. Valley Highway "Northwest Electronics. Inc. -3800 W. Valley Road "A America. Inc. -:5800 W. Valley Road. Suite A B. NW :56-2:5-4 Howard Cooper Corp. -4000 W. Valley Road Ryder Truck Rental -4130 W. Valley Road Fell & Co .• Inc. -4100 W. Valley Road Brass Bell Furniture Clearance Ctr. -4100 W. Valley Road Faygem -4100 W. Valley Road . Jantzen Fabric outlet -4104 W. Valley Road Flower Bo)( Florist -2120 S.W. 43rd St. C. NW 25-23-4 Andy's Tukwila Station -2408 W. Valley Road , "Both retail and wholesale. SM:1753G:wr June 16. 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Page 4 Renton Majn Library Additions and Renovation Bid Award City Clerk reported bid opening 6/10/86 for Library Renovation Project; 7 bids; Engineer's estimate: $740;000.00 base bid (without sales tax). Refer to Library Board. Library Board recommended award of contract to Parks Construction, Inc. of Seattle with addition of . Alternates No. I ($4,500.00) and No.2 ($1,900.00) and with deletion of Alternates No.5 ($7,700), No. 6 ($4,500.00) and No.7 ($9,600.00) for a total amount of $923,7 I 5.00. Library Director Clark Peterson explained addition of Alternate No. I for low-emissibility glass to the structure for insulating purposes, and Alternate No.2 for signage on the down-river side of the Library. He reported that Alternates 3 and 4 were not selected (book drop and sign), and Alternates 5 (public address system), 6 (sprinkler system over river) and 7 (carpet pad) were deleted due to high costs. Upon Council inquiry, Mr Peterson advised that with the contingency, budgeted funds for the project will be sufficient. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE LIBRARY BOARD. CARRIED. Pan Abode Cedar Homes Reguest for Vacation Waiver Letter was read from John L. Hubbard, Pan Abode Cedar Homes, 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, requesting waiver of vacation procedure by use of quit claim deed and waiver of fees due to claimed improper dedication by State of section of Lake Washington Boulevard and bridge over 1-405. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ANP CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. victoria Hjlls FPUP-042-85 Letters were entered into the record urging the Council to reject Final Planned Unit Development for Victoda Hills Phase II from Steve Ferrell, George Post, Richard & Cheryl Didrickson, Martin Hokanson, Leo Zipp, Daniel J. Kent, Bruce & Debra Haninnen, Marita Kent, Beth Crittenden, and Mary Bard. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THESE LETTERS TO WAYS ANP MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. LIP 327 Restructuring Reauest Added letter was read from Richard D. Roodman, Administrator of Valley Medical Center, requesting that Local Improvement District 327, improvement to S. 43rd Street, be restructured to include only Valley Medical Center property since the other property owner originally included in the LID cannot I meet financial obligations. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER I • THIS MATTER TO WAYS ANP MEANS COMMITTEE. Council members Stredicke and Clymer objected to lending the City's credit to a single property owner to fund roadway improvements. MOTION CARRIED. Fourth of July Softball Game Added correspondence was read from the Senior Sluggers challenging City officials and their spouses to the annual softball game. Interested players should contact the Park Department. Parker PUP Letters were entered from Jim and Barbi Owens requesting a complete environmental impact statement for the Parker PUD; and from Rosemary Quesenberry requesting a traffic impact analysis at the intersection of 116th and Puget Drive for the Parker PUD. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THIS <::ORRESPONDENCE BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS PLANNING AND PEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE n wil d 'n . PlannlDg an eve opment ommlttee aITman eolker presented a report indicating that the Committee has monitored the progress of the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment, finds the current draft of the resolution and interlocal agreement to be acceptable, and recommends approval of both documents by Council and referral to Ways and Means Committee, followed by submission to King County Boundary Review Board. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.-Upon inquiry by Councilman Clym~r regarding advantages to the proposal, Policy Development Director Springer pointed out location of properties on a vicinity map which would be annexed to each city. He advised that if the proposal is approved, the City of Renton will relinquish 101.65 acres in 45 parcels with an assessed valuation of $14,378,100. In return, the City will annex 114.01 acres in four parcels with an assessed valuation of $2,879.745. However, the majority of the property Renton would acquire in this process is undeveloped Burlington Northern land which, when fully developed, should have an assessed valuation of $8.00 per square foot or $34,000,000. Straightening the boundary would also result in both cities sharing costs of two expensive capital improvements projects: extension of Strander Boulevard and 27th, and upgrading the railroad crossing on SW 43rd Street. Councilman Clymer questioned whether consideration had been given to tax revenues gained or lost through the adjustment. Although Mr. Springer was uncertain of proposed use of the Burlington Northern property, he did not preclude the possibility of retail activity on the site. For the record, Councilman Stredicke noted that although he did not sign the Committee report, he would neither vote nor speak against the motion. Councilman Hughes requested that a report responding to issues raised by Councilman Clymer be provided to Ways and Means Committee. ROLL CALL: 5 A YES: MATHEWS, HUGHES, KEOLKER, STREDlCKE,. . REED. 2 NAYS: .TRIMM, CLYMER. CARRIED. . ~. , . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT June 16. 1986 The Planning and Development Committee has monitored the progress of the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment. finds the current draft of the Resolution and Interlocal Agreement to be acceptable. and recommends that the Council approve both documents for submission to the Boundary Review Board. (See attachment.) Clllct re -(" ,--ti--l 'I t t' /Yl"'-fc kh')::; d rn ~ S CD yn n'I ; tie e . Richard M. Stredicke. Member "9'Ohn Reed '\ ·J , I " .. Renb,n City Counc i 1 4/14/86 Page six Consent Agenda continued Tri-Delt 75% Annexat ion continued Honey Creek Associates 75% Annexation, Rezone, PPUD Hearing R-014-85 PPUD-015-84 Honey Creek' Interceptor Connection Fee CORRESPONDENCE Rankin Request for Sewe r Connec t i on/ Annexation . Ant i-Abort ion' Pickets } Playt ime Court Case Gene Coulon Park OLD BUSINESS Committee of the Whole Rentoq/Tukwj la 8Q''Pda ry Adjustment (Referred 3/10/86) SE Renton~lssaquah Road, 600 feet east of Sunset Boulevard NE and Duvall Avenue NE; also.recommended in accordance with RCW 35A.14.340 is consideration of departmental recommendation for G-I zoning. on the site .. Council concur. Pol icy Development Department .requested Council ·set a publ ic hearing on 5/12/86, to consider the Honey Creek Associates 75% Annexation Petition and associated Rezone, File No. R-014-84, and Planned Unit Development, File No; PPUD-015-84, located southeast of NE 27th Street and east of Kirkland Avenue NE in the area known as "Devil's Elbow." Council concur. Public Works/UtIlIties Department requested CIty-held latecomers agreement fee be established for sewer connections to Honey Creek Interceptor. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA As PRESENTED. CARRIED. Letter was .read from J. L. Rankin, Rankin Construction, requesting temporary sewer connection and annexation for property located at 10404 SE 166th, Renton, due to septic system failure (owner, John Young); neighbor Monty Farrell has agreed to provide easement. MOVED 'BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED . Letter was read from Baird M. Bardarson, M.D., Cedar River Clinic, 4300 Talbot 'Road South, requestIng pol ice response 'to anti-abortion picketers trespassing and harrassing patients at the cl inlc. Response from Mayor· Shinpoch indicated that a distinction must be made between outright trespassing and First Amendment guarantees; parking lots, even on private property, have a quasl-publ ic status; and police are instructed to observe, ascertain that demonstrators are not impeding traffic, creating a safety problem, physically denying ingresi/access or otherwise breaking the law. Demonstrators will be cited if they engage in unlawful behav i or. Card from Velma Evans expressed appreciation to the City for pursuing the Playtime court case jnd providing citizens with useable, lovely Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park as well as other park programs. Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole report recommending that the Policy Development Department proceed with negotiations with the City of Tukwila to adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary I ine and adopt the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. Reasons for the change are: I) .Irregular line creates Identity confusion for businesses; 2) Lack of control of development approval process may impact adjacent land use compatibility; 3) Difficulty in providing utilities and public services to area bisected by the railroad. Under the proposal, Tukwila would gain 45 parcels (101 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $14 million. Renton would gain II parcels (114 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $3 million. While Renton would initially lose $36,000 per year in 1986 tax dollars, projected development of the Burlington Northern site south of 27th Street West should accrue a tax benefit 'to Renton In the'near future. The cost of two railroad crossing projects, one.with the extension of 27th Street West (Strander Boulevard), and the other on SW 43rd, would be shared equally by the two Jurisdictions. .' l I I .\~ Ren t'bn City Counc i I 4/14/86 Page seven Old Business con t i nued Committee of the Whole Renton/Tukwi la Boundary Adjustment con t I nued Proposed Counc i Iman ic Bond Issues Renton would assume full costs for the P-I Channel and Tukwila would assume costs of Green River dike construction and maintenance. Newly constructed utility lines in the area north of 43rd Street between the tracks and the Green River would remain under Renton ownership and properties would continue to be assessed the monthly service charges by Renton. The Committee recommended that the Policy Development Department proceed with negotiations with Tukwila and, prepare proper annexation legislation. Further, the Committee recommended that this Item be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for regular monitoring and progress reports. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. Councilmen Stredicke and Trimm spoke against the motion due to concerns related to annexing property served by Renton utilities to another city. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: MATHEWS, HUGHES, KEOLKER, REED. 3 NAYS: TRIMM, CLYMER, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole report ,regarding proposed Councilmanic Bond Issues. The ,report stated that due to current low Interest 'rates, pending adverse tax changes, and cost reduction when combining issues, Finance Director Clements had recommended that Council consider bonding certain projects: 1) limited General Obi igatlQn BQnd Refunding 2) GQlf CQurse Financing 3) Library RemQdel & Equipment Rental 4) Purchase of Panther Creek Wetlands and Street Sweeper 5) Phase I Qf GQlf CQurse CIP $2,140,000 3,965,000 1,600,000 180,000 821,000 Items I and 2 are cu~rently funded by CQuncilmanlc Bonds. Thus Qnly items 3, 4 and 5 would increase the bQnded indebtedness by $2.6 million. The Administration prQvided a further listing of capital projects which may require funding by 1990. The project receiving the most interest and Council discussion was the Community Center. It has a projected cos,t of $5 million, with approximately half that amount to be recovered from the sale of Mother's Park. The Comm I t tee, recommended that Counc i I approve the Counc II man ie, bond issues as suggested by staff, with the additional ~ale of $2.5 mill ion for the Community Center. It was further recommended that the Administration be authorized to open formal negotiations on the sale of Mother's Park; and ,that the' matter of Councilmanic Bonds be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT.* For the record, Mayor Shlnpoch reported that Finance Director Clements had provided Council members with a complete fiscal report at the Committee of, the Whole meeting on 4/10/86 outlining the Impact of the bond issue with the addition of the Community Center. Council has reviewed the report, the, matter was discussed at length, and it appears Council Is satisfied that sufficient funds exist to pro~eed. A consensus was reached that bonds should be issued rather" than placing the matter on an election bal16t. Council members are fully aware that an expenditure of this magnitude will preclude some'other capital items. Regarding Project No.4, street sweeper, Councilman Clymer felt that consideration should have been given to contracting , street sweeping services with a private company rather than purchasing the equipment. Regarding the decision to finance ,a community center with Councilmanic Bonds,he supported the , COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 14, 1986 , RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (Referred 3/10/86) Policy Development Director, Larry Springer, presented an issues and procedures proposal to Council which would adopt the eastern 'edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. Rationale for the change include: 1. Irregular line creates identity confusion for businesses. 2. Lack of control of development approval process may impact adjacent land use compatibility. 3. Difficulty in providing utilities and public services to area bisected by the railroad. Under the proposal, Tukwila would gain 45 parcels (101 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $14 million. Renton would gain 11 parcels (114 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $3 million. While Renton would initially lose $36,000 per year in 1986 tax dollars, projected development of the Burlington,Northern site south of 27th St. W. should accrue a tax benefit to Renton in the near future. , The cost of two railroad crossing projects, one with the extension of 27th St. W. (Strander Bl vd. ), and the other on SW 43rd, woul d be shared equally by the two jurisdictions. Renton would assume full costs for the P-l Channel and Tukwila would assume costs of Green River dike construction and maintenance. Newly constructed utility lines in the area north of 43rd Street between the tracks and the Green River would remain under Renton ownership and properties would continue to be assessed the monthly service charges by Renton. ACTION -Motion by Hughes, second by Reed, to direct Policy Development to proceed with negotiations with Tukwila and prepare proper annexation legislation. The Committee of the Whole further recommends this item be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for regular monitoring and progress reports. Nancy Mathews. Council President j c:; Glacier Park Company REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. April' 7, 1986 , Mr. Larry Springer City of Renton Policy Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Orillia Industrial Park Dear La rry: (;n( ut-K~NTON APR q 1986 As I indicated to you in our last conversation, Glacier Park Company fully anticipates that development in and around the Orillia Industrial Park will continue in keeping with the office/hi-tech type of project we presently have underway for Boeing Electronics Company. This 'type of development will en- hance the area and should result in increased property value also. I'm sure you will want to point this out when presenting the boundary adjust- ment issue for consideration. I believe you will find that.~ny discrepancy in property values between T n at this time will be offset in the r erm. ,--=--:';:'~. On another related subject, I am continuing to pursue alternatives to the rail issue we'd~scussed. ' f my progress. ! I \. R. ~" l''\Z.s>\? <f:'2..."'""'1 t=-<.,,-~.,,,Q...~ '>'<:\{~~",rn,,--~-r Sincerely,' 'I;" /.' ~ J,./H/cL R.V.Hiulli' Senior Director Portfglio Development jmc 6.05.67 \:'<>-y,:;-(.. \S" \ t..'V~ '--\i: C: \ .., v.l.. """ C::""'\ ~ r>-....v..5. ~ " I\-"-l.l' r,{, J c:: '-~0 k.. v}-O 'z., Go \1',' " . l-v il:r ? G~,c" '" R," I ? COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMmTTEE REPORT APRIL 14, 1986 RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (Referred 3/10/86) Cllv Ut-HENTON nPR 14 1986 POLlC'I nl=\lI=.LOPMFNT ~er;~ Policy Development Director, Larry Springer, presented an issues and procedures proposal to Council which would adopt the eastern 'edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. Rationale for the change include: 1. Irregular line creates identity confusion for businesses. 2. Lack of control of development approval process may impact adjacent land use compatibility. 3. Difficulty in providing utilities and public services to area bisected by the ra il road. Under the proposal, Tukwila would gain 45 parcels (101 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $14 million. Renton would gain 11 parcels (114 acres) with an assessed'value of approximately $3 million. While Renton would initially lose $36,000 per year in 1986 tax dollars, projected development of the Burlington Northern site south of 27th St. W. should accrue a tax benefit to Renton in the near, future. The cost of two railroad crossing projects, one with the extension of 27th St. W. (Strander Blvd.), and the other on SW 43rd, would be shared equally by the two jurisdictions. Renton would assume full costs for the P-l Channel and Tukwila would assume costs of Green River construction and dike maintenance. Newly constructed utility lines in the area north of 43rd Street between the tracks and the Green River would remain under Renton ownership and properties would continue to be assessed the monthly service charges by Renton. ACTION -Motion by Hughes, second by Reed, to direct Policy Development to proceed with negotiations with Tukwila and prepare proper annexation legislation. The Committee of the Whole further recommends this item be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for regular monitoring and progress reports. Nancy Mathews, Council President ATTACHMENT #3 COMPARATIVE ASSESSED VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwlla Boundary Issue - I. KOhL BUSINESS PARK (City of Renton) Property Area (Square Footage) 65,205 sq. ft. (Developed) 60,851 sq. ft. (Developed) 48,169 sq. ft. (Developed) Assessed Valuation Lot {11 Lot. {12 Lot 03 Lot 04 .Lot {15 Lot {16 Lot 07 Lot {18 59,417 sq. ft. (Under Construction) 258,888 sq. ft. (Developed) $ 516,000 (Ufrid &. Improvements) $ 182,500 (Land Only) $1,206,000 (Land &. Improvements) $ 163,300 (Land Only) . $3,085,000 (band &. Improvements) $1,593,900 (Land &. Imptovements) $ 500,100 (Land Only) 139,818 sq. ft. (Developed) 200,075 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) 122,628 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) . $ 481,500 (Land Only) TOTAL 1,075,051 sq. ft. $7,728,300 Assessed Valuation/ Sq; ft. = $7.19. II. ACQUISITIONS FROM PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE Property Areg (Acres) Tax Lot 04 Tax Lot (119 Tax Lot (IU Tax Lot (142 23.44 40.21 19 •. 05 ~ Assessed Valuation $ 510,500 (Land Only) $1,751,500 (Land Only, Developed, however) $ 414,900 (Land Only) S 216.400' (Land Only) TOTAL 98.73 actes/4,300,679 sq. ft. $2,893,300 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $0.67 PROJgCTgO TOTAL ASSgSSEO VAbUATlON (a) $ 2.00/sq. ft. " $ 8,601,358 (b) $ 4.00/sq. ft. = $17,202,716 (e) $ 6.00/sq. ft. = $25,804,074 (d) $ 8.00/sq. ft. " $34,405,432 (e) $lO.OO/sq. ft.,,, $43,006,790 RENTON/TUKWILA BORDER EXCHANGE ATTACHMENT fa -Assessed Valuation and Acreage Analysis - TO TUKWILA TO RENTON MAP NO. PARCEL VALUE AC PARCEL VALUE AC ~,6~ 13 27 (portion) $ 157,700 12.79 TOTALS 1 parcel $ 157,700 3.62 o parcels 18 63 $ 255,000 2.35 32 200 0.27 . 28 167,600 3.85 7 MOe 198,300 4.55 TOTALS 4 parcels $ 621,100 11.02 o parcels 21 38 MOC $1,052,500 1.84 41 $ 216,400 19.05 ..Q..2! 8 MOe (p) 39,600 2.91 4 510,500 23.44 1.14 9 MOC (p) 49,600 3.05 43 115,700 2.15 50 54,700 0.84 51 33,000 0.72 23 73,700 2.16 6 222,000 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 34,500 44.10 21 MOC 81,500 2.45 2.16 22 (portion 141,600 10.47 TOTALS 11 parcels $1,898,400 23.23 . 2 parcels $ 726,900 42.49 25 21· $ 544,500 1.61 42 $ 216,400 16.03 59 40,400 0.37 20 1,075,000 2.14 33 1,479,400 3.69 17 645,700 5.93 3.01 . ) 23 (portion) 102,700 10.43 5.44 24 (portion) 87,000 44.10 22 197,300 3.01 TOTALS 8 parcels $4,172,000 25.20 1 parcel $ 216,400 16.03 , 3/86 AUSTIN COMPANY ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue- A. EXISTING -NORTHWEST CORNER LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 16th STREET Lot /II Lot 112 Lot 113 Lot /14 TOTAL Property Area (Square Footage) IOB,900 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.5 acres) 230,432 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (5.29 acres) 100, IBB sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.3 acres) (15 acres) 653.400 sq. ft. (DevelOped) 1,092,920 sq. ft. (25.09 acres) Assessed Valuation $ 272,200 (Land Only) 576,000 (Land Only) 200,300 (Land Only) (Land & 19,000,000 Improvements) $20,046,500 A.V./sq. ft. = $18.34 Raw Land A.V./sq. ft. = $ 2.39 B. UNDER CONSTRUCTION. UNDER REVIEW -NORntIIEST CQRNER EAST VALLEY ROAD AND S.W. 16th STREET (I) Under Construction -140,000 sq. ft. four-story offlco building on 7.4 acres with building permit valuation to date of $7,802,775. (2) Under Review -140,000 sq. ft. four-story office building on 7 acres. (3) Future -Two additional structures similar to (I) and (2) adjacent on the south. Total Site = 27.94 acres 1720G Lot /II = 7.19 acres Lot 112 = 7.24 acres Lot tI3 = 7.23 acres Lot /14 = 6.2B acres Raw Land $ 380,575 380,575 380,575 380.575 $1,522,300 A.V./sq. ft. = $1.25 Dev. Land (As of '186) A.V./sq. ft. = $7.66 '\ , "86 AUSTI N COMPANY ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue - A. EXISTING -NORTHWEST CORNER LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 16th STREET Lot 'I Lot 1/2 Lot 1/3 Lot /14 TOTAL Property Area (Sguare Footage) 108,900 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.5 acres) 230,432 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (5.29 acres) 100,188 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.3 acres) (15 acres) 653,400 sg. ft. (Developed) 1,092,920 sq. ft. (25.09 acres) Assessed Valuation $ 272,200 (Land Only) 576,000 (Land Only) 200,300 (Land Only) (Land & 19,000,000 Improvements) $20,048,500 A.V./sq. ft. = $18.34 Raw Land A.V./sq. ft. = $ 2.39 B. UNDER CONSTRUCTION, UNDER REVIEW -NORTHWEST CORNER EAST VALLEY ROAD AND S.W. 16th STREET (I) Under Construction -140,000 sq. ft. four-story office building on 7.4 acres with building permit valuation to date of $7,802,775. (2) Under Review -140,000 sq. ft. four-story offlca building on 7 acres. (3) Future -Two additional structures similar to (I) and (2) adjacent on the south. Total Site = 27.94 acres I720S Lot 'I = 7.19 acres Lot '2 = 7.24 acres Lot '3 = 7.23 acres Lot 1/4 = 6.28 acres Raw Land $ 380,575 380,575 380,575 380,575 $1,522,300 A.V./sq. ft. = $1.25 Dev. Land (As of 3/86) A.V./sq. ft. = $7.66 ",' -\ _0 :::::.::::==::::=: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Hap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton L ONGACRES Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila :+: '/ o 2000· ,/1t!Rf'_ MAP NO. PARCEL 26 TOTALS o parcels 29 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 TOTALS 21 parcels . TOTALS TO TUKWILA TO RENTON TO TUKWILA VALUE $ 326,700 2,223,700 2,235,100 18,500 1,496,600 10,800 25,100 21,300 350,700 21,300 17,500 35,600 49,100 20,800 32.500 22,800 18,200 18,200 167,200 254,900 162,300 $7,528''100 45 parcels 11 parcels -2 - -" ---- AC PARCEL 19 1 parcel 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 ··6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 O.lS 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 3.8.58 o parcels 0160(Portion) 0145 0155(Portion) 0150 0320 0330 Lot 112 7 parcels $14,376,100 $ 2,679,745 TO RENTON VAWE $1,751,500 $1,751,500 $ $ 59,508 9,500 42,902 71,800 676 37 522 184,945 101.65 acres 114.01 acres AC 40.21 40.21 ... 11.79 .29 1.29 1.49 .28 .02 .12 15.28 f ... :~ ..... CJ OF TO: FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 265-8678 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY May 23, 1986 Larry Springer, Policy Development Steve Munson Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY '. 5 iTY OF HENTON Director~ MAY 2,; 1986 RE: Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Dear Larry and Steve: I have reviewed the Interlocal Agreement and believe it to be in general acceptable legal form. I have several minor suggestions cir questions. In the second.and third "Whereas" statements, I would suggest that the words "and described on Exhibit attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference-a8 if fully set forth" be moved right behind the Resolution number. This would cause the words "which calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila" and the words "to be annexed to Renton" to be placed together. This would eliminate a split in the flow of these paragraphs and make them easier to read. In the second "Whereas" paragraph the words "to Tukwila" ending the section should be moved up behind the word "annexation" in the start of the fourth line from the bottom. In paragraphs 2 and 3 regarding the funding of street improvements at S.W. 27th andS.W. 43rd, Renton's share is referred to as not less than 50%. Although these sites are to be within Tukwila, the City of Renton is still agreeing to fund not less than 50%. That would imply to me that the City may pay more than 50%. Is that the intention of this agreement, or is the intention that the City of Renton's share shall be 50% (not less than 50%, but not more than 50%)? With respect to the P-l Channel. in paragraph 4, the City of Renton agrees to assume all costs of construction and maintenance but allows Tukwila the right .to connect to and use the P-l Channel. Is there any substantial likelihood that the City of Tukwila will generate substantial waters that go into the P-l Channel such that the capacity may be overloaded or substantial maintenance costs created? Can Tukwila change its drainage flow so that the impact on the P-l Channel would be substantial? Larry Springer Steve Munson Page 2 May 23, 1986 On paragraph 6 entitled "Frank Zepp Bridge" there is also a discussion about traffic signals. I would suggest that a new paragraph be created'to discuss the traffic signals. As you can see, my comments are mostly procedural in nature or reflect a lack of knowledge concerning the details of this exchange. It may be that no changes to the agreement are necessary. (although I would like to see the "Whereas" paragraphs changed to read a little easier). ct:~. Warre" LJW:nd cc: Mayor OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON. WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON. WASHINGTON &8067 266-8678 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY AnORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY AnORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY AnORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT Clry AnORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY AnORNEY May 22, 1986 MARTHA A. RiWR'CHUosdilUHiOO AnORNEY MAY 2 U 1986 TO: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk POLICY n~"S;tJ)9MF.NT f\Cr-o:T FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Resolution Authorizing an Interlocal Planning Agreement with King County Dear Maxine: I have reviewed the above captioned Resolution and it is approved as to legal form. /:' d.~warr.n LJW:nd cc: Mayor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 9B1BB (2061433·1800 Gary L. vanDusen, Mayor Mr. Steve Munson Assistant Planner Renton Policy Dev. Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 May 20, 1986 RE: Environmental Checklist for Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. Munson: I hereby reaff~rm my staff's determination (1) that only one checklist for the entire boundary adjustment action is necessary and (2) that it is appropriate for your office to have lead agency status as provided for in WAC 197-11-926. I would also recommend the following modifications in the proposed checklist: Pg. 2. A.12. Recommend attaching a map of the affected areas showing whi ch areas would go to each City. Pg. 7. B.8.f. Modify to read as follows: There are a number of Comprehensive Plan land use designations in the subject area for each community. Primary designations are for commer- cial and industrial uses. Pg. 7. B.8.g. Modify to read as follows: Areas within 200 feet of the Green River's mean high water mark are des i gnated "Urban" in the Tukwi 1 a and Renton shore 1 i ne management programs. Sincerely, ~ , .~ Bradley J. 0 lins Responsible Official TO: FROM: RE: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 828 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY May 19, 1986 MARTHA A. FRENCH,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY Larry Springer Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Annexation Statutes CiTY OF RENTON MAY 19 1986 POLICY f:\""I;LOPMENT !1CJ>r. Dear Larry: Just in case you did not get a copy of the newest legislation on annexations, please find enclosed a copy of Chapter 253 of' the 1986 Session Laws for the Regular Session. The law is not effective until June 11, 1986. I have not taken the time to determine whether or not this change in the legislation Ivill effect the boundary line readjustment between Renton and Tukwila. Perhaps you can review the change in legislation and the timing and see if anything need by done because of this legislation. My initial review of the legislation would seem to indicate that this makes the boundary line adjustment easier to handle rather than more difficult. LJW/jw Encl. cc: Mayor Shinpoch La~ Warren "----. J) 5/19 2) Prior to 6/1 3) 7/10 4) 8/11 or 8125 5) 9/1 I or 9125 1658G RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT -Projected Task Timellne - Resolutions Renton could schedule to be heard by City Council on this date. Tukwila has already adopted the first resolution. Tukwila staff advises that this would be repealed. however. and the latest draft tentatively agreed upon by staff would be adopted some time in May. No specific date was identified by Tukwila. However. it would probably be May 19th. Legal Descriptions. Interlocals. SEPA These items would all have to be completed prior to the first of June. the deadline for submitting material to be considered by the King County Boundary Review Board during the month of July and the beginning of the 60-day review period. King County Boundary Review Board Meeting The Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment is considered on this date. Public Hearings Renton and Tukwila. Tukwila conducts public hearings on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. Should we conduct them on the same night? Property Owner Protest If owners of less than 60% of the assessed valuation within the annexation area protest the proposal within 30 days of passage by the respective City Councils. then the proposal becomes law. (House Bill 1386 -1986 Washington Legislature). ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVI ,HEE. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: ___ 5.:../_12....:/_8_6 _______ COMMENTS DUE: 5/19/86 ECF _~ _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s) . __ ..:::N.:.,:/A::..... ____________________ _ PROPONENT: City of Renton/City of Tukwila PROJECT TITLE: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This is a proposed adjustment of the common boundary line between Renton and Tukwila in order to more logically provide services to the citizens of both communities. LOCATION: The proposal is located in the southwest quadrant of the City of Renton generally following the easterly right-of-way line of the BN railroad tracks. (See map) SITE AREA: ______ ±_2_l_5~a~c~re~s~ ______ ___ IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1) Ear th 2) Air 3) Wat er 4) P1a nts 5) Ani mals 6) Ene rgy and Natural Resources 7) Env ironmental Health 8) Lan d and Shoreline Use 9) Hou sing 10) Aes thetics 11) Lig ht and Glare 12) Rec reation BUILDING AREA (gross): ________ _ MINOR IMPACT MAJOR IMPACT , MORE INFORMATION 13) His toric and Cultural Preservation 14) Tra 15) Pub 16) Uti COMMENTS: nsportation lic Services lities RECOMMENDATION: o DNS D MITIGATED DNS o EIS REVIEWED By: ______________ TITLE: _______________ _ DATE: FORM 1114 REVISED 9/10/85 I d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N.A. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of ve etation found on the site: D deciduous tree: alder ap e, aspen, other D evergreen tree: Ir, e a pine, other D~ D~ . D crop or grain D Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other D water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other D other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N.A. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No species are known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N.A. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: <8aw~heron, eagle,QongbirOSyother ________ _ Mammals: eer, bear elk, beaver, other -:---,~Sm~a~l!:.;l"-____ _ Fish: bass, ~€~ug herring, shellfish, other _________ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the si teo None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is within the Pacific flyway. -5- d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N.A. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N.A. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N.A. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N.A. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, includinq exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None as a result of this proposal. I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N·.A. b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N.A. -6- 2) What types and leva Is of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N.A. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N.A. B. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current uses of the subject properties include residential office, storage and warehousing, sewage treatment facilities, a rock quarry, meat rendering plant, and some light industrial activities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Some properties were used in the past for agricultural purposes but none are currently. c. Describe any structures on the si teo Structures include·housing units, offices, warehouses, and utilities. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N.A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. g. h. Both cities have several zoning categories in the subject area. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? There are a number of Comprehensive Plan land use designations in the subject area for each community. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Some portions along the Green River (near S.W. 43rd Street and north of Longacres at 1-405) are designated "Urban" in the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program (1983). Has any part of the site been classified as an Menvironmentally sensitive M area? If so, specify. Several strips on both sides of the proposed boundary line south of 1-405 and north of S.W. 43rd Street in Renton are designated "Green- belt.1I This includes some limitations on development. N.A. i.Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N.A. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N.A. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N.A. -7- I. Proposed measurlo. to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing The review and consideration of the staffs and legislative bodies of both cities has taken into account all existing and projected land uses and plans. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N.A. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N.A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N.A. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N.A. II. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N.A. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N.A. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N.A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N.A. -8- 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are some facilities provided by private enterprises for their employees and some public exercise facilities. Fort Dent Park (a King County facility) is located near the north central portion of this study area as is the Foster Golf Course. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N.A. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N.A. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The major public highways servicing the subject area include 1-405, 1-5, and SR 181. Some arterials of both communities are also located here. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit has a number of , routes traversing the area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Nt.A. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 1) Both communities will either assume or share responsibility for the following public improvements: a) Future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks. b) Grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks (if undertaken). c) Maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. 2) The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Wash- ington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR 181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. -9- e. Will the project _ (or occur in the immediate vicim., of) water. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. N.A. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. N.A. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation irnpacts. if any: See #14(d) above. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. No. Responsibilities for specific services will just be exchanged between the two cities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. See below. 16. Utilities a. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. See #15(b) above. c. SIGNA TURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner 15.b. Those services most directly affected will be utilities. The City of Renton (through an inter local agreement) should retain ownership of i existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the ! railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the i dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should I be terminated after annexation. I -10- , #176 :11-8-84 . ', .. . , O . SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTlOI ... (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies. plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions. be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How' would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production. storage. or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? This depends upon the specific proposals for individual properties in the communities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N.A. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants. animals. fish. or marine life? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals. fish. or rTJarine life are: N.A. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and' natural resources are: N.A. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks. wilderness. wild and scenic rivers. threatened or endangered species habitat. historic or cultural sites. wetlands. floodplains. or prime farmlands? It may. serve to indirectly improve the water quality of the Green River and give some integrity to the Greenbelt designations of those areas straddling the proposed boundary line. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Several interlocal agreements regarding utilities and road improvements may help reduce some otherwise adverse impacts. -II - 5. How would the propos". ..e likely to affect land and ShOI ~.,ne use. including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? It should serve to discourage or disallow such incompatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The inter local agreements mentioned in 4 (above) will likely reduce these impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N.A. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N.A. 7. Identify. if possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Based upon the efforts put together so far, no such conflicts are foreseen. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson -12- , - OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, C'TY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASS'STANT C'TY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASS'STANT C'TY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASS'STANT C'TY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASS'STANT C'TY AHORNEY May:9; 1986 MARTHA A. FRENCH,ASS'STANT C'TY ATTORNEY TO: Steve Murison, Assistant Planner CITY OF RENTON MAY 121986 FROM: Lawrence, J. Warren, City 'Attorney, POLICY nF\'~LOPMEIIIT "cp.,- RE: Proposed Renton-Tukwila Bouridary Adjustment Dear Steve: The packEit of information you forwarded to me appears to me in appropriate form. However, on the Resolution establishing intent to annex on page'3, paragraph 2, second full paragraph, first line is contained the words "this road". Similarly, the first line on pi'ige 3 contains a similar designation. In reading the Resolution I was somewhat confused as to the reference to this road. Apparently in the first instance a~ the top of page 3, this road refers to Strander Boulevard. Apparently in the second instance this road refers to S.W. 43rd or S. l80th. I think it would be better form if we specifically referred to the road by a numerical or name identification so as to avoid the indefinite adjective. J. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 MAYOR MEMORANDUM May 8, 1986 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FROM: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner RE: PROPOSED RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Dear Larry: We are transmitting to you the draft resolution, procedures, and tentative schedule for the proposed Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment. Also included is the interloca1 agreement regarding utilities that was discussed yesterday (May 7th) with Larry Springer and'Dick Houghton. We would request that you review these documents and advise our office of any amendments or additions you believe to be appropriate. Steve Munson • Enclosure · ® ' llAP REFERENCE NUI~Br 5/1/85 CD T U K W I LAC I T Y LIM ITS UNOFFICIAL REVISED BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Boundary limits of the City of Tukwila, in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of Sections 10, II, 13, 14, IS, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35, and 36 all in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. described as follows: Beginning at a concrete monument at the northwest corner of Section 36, T 23 N, R 4 E, W.M.: thence South 0001'3S" West, 1320.01 feet along the west line of said Section 36 to the centerline of South lS0th Street: thence North Sg056'20· East, S66.76 feet more or less along the centerline of South lS0th Street to the centerline of West Valley Highway (also known as SR lSI) and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence southerly along the centerline of said West Valley Highway to a point on the centerline which is North 11°46" East, 1115.77 feet from the southwest corner of said Section 36: ~ thence on an angle to the right of 79°47' westerly 1950 feet more or less ~ to the thread of the Green River (formerly known as the White River): thence westerly along the thread of said river to the north-south cen- terline of Section 35, T 23 N, R 4 E, W.M.: thence continuing along the thread of the Green River-to its intersection with the easterly production of the north line of Government Lot 7 of said Section 35: thence continuing southerly along the middle of the river 460 feet more or less to the intersection of a line which is perpendicular to the thread of the Green River and connecting a Point A on the west bank of the Green River described as follows: Beginning on the easterly margin of 57th Avenue South in Government Lot 7, in said Section 35 at a Point B being south 89°03'20" East 1656.75 feet and North 0°56'40" East 104S.79 feet North of the southwest corner of the south- west 1/4 of said Section 35: said point also being a point on the present Tukwil a City Boundary: thence South S013' 05" EajJ _ 36.70 feet: thence South 19°59'25" West 520.10 feet: thence South 73°05'W East 233.32 feet: thence North 16°29'55" East 474.00 feet; thence South 64°17'20" East 232.26 feet more or less to said Point A on the river bank; thence cont i nu i n9 from Poi nt B southerly along the easterly margi n of 57th Avenue South (Anna Mess Co. Rd.) 360 feet more or less to an intersection with the south line of the north 490 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the south- west 1/4 of said Section 35; thence westerly along said south line 110 feet more or less to the east line of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; ® thence South 4°04'20" West 2S9.11 feet to the westerly margin of 57th Avenue South (Mess Bros. Co. Rd. No. 76); thence South 28°10'OS" West 191.48 feet along said road margin; thence continuing along said margin along a curve to the left having a radius of 306.4S feet to a survey monument on the south line of the north l,OS9.31 feet of the said southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 35; thence continuing along said curve through a central angle of 2°52'12" an arc distance of 15.35 feet: -1- ® ® ® thence South 01°53'23" East along said westerly margin of 57th Avenue. South. 216.74 feet; thence North 87°59'06" West; 438.99 feet along the south line of said southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; thence North 16°56'40· East. 262.12 feet; thence north 47°11"37" West 453.79· feet; thence northerly a distance of 282 feet more or less to the south line of the north 490 feet of said subdivision to a point which is South 87°57'17" East 495 feet frOID the westerly line of said subdivision; thence North 87°57'17" West along said south line 495 feet to the west line of said Section 35; thence northerly along said west line of said Section 35. 550 feet more or less to the southeasterly margin of Orillia Road Extension North; thence northerly along said southeasterly margin 2150 feet more or less to the west 1 ine of the east 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of said Section 35; thence northerly along said west line 1575 feet more or less to the northerly margin of South 178th Street (Also known as P. J. Musiel Co. Rd.) thence northwesterly along said north margin to the easterly margin of Primary State Highway No.1. as condemned in King County Superior Court Case No. 596587; thence northerly along said east margin to an intersection with the south line of the north 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4. south- west 1/4 of Section 26. T 23 N. R 4 E W.M •• which point is also known as the southeast corner of Tract 41 of the unrecorded plat of Sunrise. View Addition; thence westerly along said south line of the north 1/2. north 1/2. south- west 1/4. southwest 1/4 of said Section 26. 921.82 + feet to the east line of the west 395.88 feet in width of the southwest 1/4-of said Section 26; which point is also known as the southwest corner of Tract 23 of Sunrise View Addition; thence northerly along said east line 466.66 feet to the northwest corner of said tract 23; thence easterly. parallel to the north line of said south- west 1/4 of said Section 26. 466.00 feet to an intersection with the cen- terline of 53rd Avenue South as established in Deeds of Conveyance. Auditor's File No. 3136424; thence northerly along said centerline 760 feet more or less to the northerly margin of South 170th Street; thence North 89°21' 31" West. 230 feet along sai d north margi n of South 170th Street; thence north 00°48' 39" West, 191.08 feet; thence North 89°21'31", 231 feet; thence North 00°48'38" West 191.09 feet to the southerly margin of South 168th Street; thence South 89°21'31" East along said southerly margin 276 feet more or less to an intersection with the southerly extension of the west line of Valley View Homes as recorded in Volume 56 of plats. page 81. Records of King County; thence northerly along said west line 830 feet more or less to the north line of the south 800 feet of the northwest 1/4 of said Section 26; thence westerly along said north line and said north line extended westerly' 694 feet more or less to the westerly margin of 51st Avenue South; thence northerly along said westerly margin 600 feet more or less to the southerly margin of South 164th Street; thence North 89°59'10" West along said southerly margin 2580 feet more or less to the southerly extension of the east right-of-way margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence northerly along said east margin to the southerly right-of-way margin of State Highway 518. as condemned -2- @ in King County Superior Court Case No. 713594. Thence east along said southerly margin to the centerline of 51st Avenue South; thence northerly along said centerline to the westerly extension of the northerly margin of South 151st Street; thence easterly along said extension and said margin 660 feet more or less to the southerly extension of the cen- terline of 53rd Avenue South (formerly Graham Avenue); thence northerly along said centerline of 53rd Avenue South 2310 feet more or less to the centerline of South 144th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said South 144th Street, 100 feet more or less to the cen- terline of 53rd Avenue South (formerly known as Graham Avenue, as platted in Richards 1st Addition to Sterling as recorded in Volume IS, Page 26, Records of King County); thence northerly along said centerline of 53rd Avenue South, 1750 feet more or less to an intersection with the centerline of an unnamed street along the north line of Colegrove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11 of plats, Page 85, Records of King County, (now known as South 139th Street); .J 7'::; --',.1., thence easterly along said centerline and the ~tei 1y extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th Street), as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as recorded in Volume 11 of plats, Page 24, Records of King County, 512.8 feet to a point that is 1069.80 feet east of the west line of Section 14, Township 23, Range 4, W.M.; thence North 45°49' West, 39.53 feet; thence North 45.00° West 323.74 feet; thence west, 276.08 feet to the westerly mar9in of 53rd Avenue South; thence South 00° 31'18" East along sai d westerly margi n to the northerly margin of So. 139th Street (formerly known as Orchard Ave.); thence South 89'41'18" West 515 feet more or less to the easterly margin of 51st Avenue South (formerly known as Charles Avenue); thence northerly along said easterly margin 315 feet more or less to the southerly margin of South 138th Avenue Street; thence North 71°53' East 144.5 feet along said southerly margin; thence North 47°35' East, 70.30 feet; thence North 34°10' East to the southerly margin of South 137th Street; thence easterly along said southerly margin to an intersection with the southwesterly margin of 56th Avenue South; thence northeasterly along the southerly margin of a strip of land described in deed recorded October 3, 1955, under Auditor's File No. 4622227, Records of King County, and known as the south line of the Manington Tract (also known as South 137th Street) 330 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue (formerlY Secondary State Highway No. 5-M); thence northwesterly along said southwesterly margin 530 feet more or less to a point being 186.79 feet southeasterly from the southerly margin of 52nd Avenue South (formerly known as Foster Street) and its intersection with the southwesterly 1 ine of the Renton-Ouwamish Junction Road (now known as Interurban Avenue); thence along a line South 40°36' West, 82.07 feet, said line being the southeasterly line of tract of land deeded to Robert W. Eddy by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 3333356, Records of King County; thence North 49°24' 00" West 82.09 feet; thence South 40°36' West, 70.00 feet; thence North 49°24'00" West 127.5 feet more or less to the centerline of 52nd Avenue South -3- .. ® @ @ ..,....... ..tJtr (Foster Street); thence SOIIttI 29°30'00. IH!S't along said centerltne 20 feet more or less; thence North 60°30'00. West, 107 feet more or less; thence North 35°45'30" Eas~ 197.83 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly margin 198.16 + feet; thence South 32°06'41" West,131.87 feet; thence North 48°14'19" West 127.90 feet; thence South 41°45'41" West, 88.13 feet; thence north 48°14'19" west, 96 feet; thence North 41°45'41" East 220 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue; thence northwesterly along sa1d southwesterly marg1n 1030 feet more or less to the southeasterly marg1n of 47th Avenue South (Adams Street) as shown on Subd1v1sion of Lots 7, 8, & 9 of the Fostorta Garden tracts, as recorded 1n Volume 11 of plats, Page 76, Records of K1ng County; thence. southwesterly along said southeasterly marg1n extended south- westerly 785 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of South 134th Street (Valley Street) as shown on Fostorta Garden tracts as recorded in Volume 9 of plats, Page 95, Records of K1ng County, Wash1ngton; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly margin 150 + feet; thence South 40°17' West, 119.11 feet; thence North 49°43' West, 10" feet; thence South 40°17' West, 132.89 feet; thence North 49°43' West 91.43 feet to the northerly 11ne of the southeasterly 1.86 acres of Tract 14, 1n sa1d Fostoria Garden Tracts; thence South 40°17' West 20.12 feet; thence North 49°43' West, 90.94 feet; thence South 40°17' West, 222.4 feet to the northerly marg1n of South 135th Streeti thence along the sa1d northerly margin westerly and northerly to the $'9ytf\West corner of Tract 17 in said Fostor1a Garden Tr:-acts; thence North 41°44'57" East, 521 feet to the southerly margin of South 133rd Street; thence westerly along said southerly margin and said margin extended westerly 522 feet more or less to the southerly extension of the westerly marg1n of 42nd Avenue South; thence northwesterly along sa1d extension and along said westerly margin, respectively, to the northerly margin of So. 133rd Street; thence westerly along said northerly margin of South 133rd Street and continuing northwesterly along the easterly margin of So. 131st Place to the north line of Tract 58 in Riverside Interurban Tracts, recorded in Volume 10 of plats, Page 74, Records of King County, Washington; thence easterly along said north line to the westerly margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence northerly along said westerly margin 1150 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue; thence southwesterly along said southwesterly margin, 60 feet more or less to an intersection with the southerly·extension of the easterly margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence north- westerly along said extension and said margin, respectively, 460 feet more or less to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread, 2150 feet more or less to an intersec- tion with the southwesterly extension of the northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, Allentown Addition, as recorded in Volume 12 of plats, Page 100, Records of King County; thence northeasterly along said extension and said northwesterly 1 ine of Lot 32, respectively, 330 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of Richard Street (now known as 50th Pl. So.) as platted in said Addition; -4- . ..; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly margin and said margin extended southeasterly; 1050 feet more or less to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence along said thread in a general southeasterly direction 4300 feet more or less to the intersection of the southeasterly production of the south- westerly margin of South 133rd Street. with the centerline of the Green River. Thence northwesterly along said production and said southwesterly margin of street to its intersection with the southeasterly margin of 56th Avenue South. Thence northeasterly along said Avenue to the most northerly corner of Tract 51. East Riverton Garden Tracts. according to plat recorded in Volume 12 of plats. Page 79 in King County. Washington; thence southeasterly along northeasterly margin of said Tract 51 and production thereof 255 feet to the southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; thence northeaserly along the southeasterly margi n of 57th Avenue South to the most northerly corner of Tract 74 of sa1d plat; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly margin of said Tract 74 and the production thereof to the centerline of the Green River; thence southeasterly along said centerline of the Green River to the west line of the northeast 1/4 of. Section 14 in T 23 N. R 4 E. W.N.; .thence northerly along said west 1 ine 120 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way. as recorded respectively in Volume 821. Page 263. Volume 825. Page 545. Volume 830. Page 305 of Deeds. Records of King County; thence southeasterly along said margin 2400 feet more or less to an intersection with the easterly extension of the centerline of said Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th). as platted in said Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts; thence easterly along said extension. 700 feet more or less to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road. County Road No.8 and Monster Road). as s.hown on·the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat. Volume 12 of plats. Page 75. Records o.f King County; thence south-easterly along said road centerline. 250 feet more or less to the cen- terline of 68th Avenue South (also known as County Road No.8 •. Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said centerline. 1470 feet more or less to the thread of the Black River; thence westerly along said thread. 480 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way as recorded, respectively,in Volume 88, Page 504, Volume 348. Page 634, Volume 352, Page 520, Volume 378, Page 211, and Volume 1499. Page 631 of DeedS, Records of King County; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly margin, 2300 feet more or less to an intersection with the easterly extension of that portion of the thread of the Green River, which bears generally westerly and which point is also 1900 feet more or less south and 850 feet more or less east of the north- west corner of Section 24 of Said T 23 N, R 4 E, W.M.; thence westerly along said extension 100 feet more or less to the thread of said Green River; . thence southeasterly along said thread, 1100 feet more or less to an angle point therein, at which point the thread of the Green River makes an angl e of 90 degrees more or 1 ess to the ri ght and bears generally south- westerly; thence northeasterly along the easterly extension of said south- westerly. bearing of said thread, 60 feet more or less to the southwesterly margin of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad right-of-way as recorded. respectively in Volume 550, Page 452, Volume 583, Page 169 of Deeds, Records of said King County; -5- · ;. ® , thence southeasterly along said southwesterly margin, 150 feet more or less to the northerly margin of Nelson Place; thence southwesterly along said northerly margin and said margin extended southerly 550 feet more or less to the southerly margin of South 153rd Street; thence easterly along said southerly. margin. 200 feet more or less to the northerly margin of Secondary State. Highw.., No. 1-L (also known as Renton Junction Way); thence easterly along safd northerly margin, 470 feet more' or less to the westerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respectively in Volume 23, page 583, Volume 24, Page 411, Volume 1030, Page 594 of Deeds, Records of said King County; thence southerly along said westerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway, 2450 feet more or less to the north line of the Bow Lake Pipeline right-of-way as deeded to the City of Seattle and recorded under Auditor's File No. 4131067, Records of King County; thence westerly along said north 11ne 880 feet more or less to the easterly margin of Secondary State Highway·No. 5-M (also known as West Valley Road); thence southerly along said margin, 1350 feet more less to the north line of the south 990 feet of the northwest 1/4 of Section 25, T 23 N, R 4 E, W.M.; thence easterly along said north line and extension thereof, 1200 feet more or 1 ess to the east li ne of sai d northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along the north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 1320 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along said east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 25, 2630 feet more or less to the left or westerly bank of the Green River (also known as the White River); thence southerly a long said 1 eft bank, 2800 feet more or 1 ess to the centerl i ne of South 180th Street; thence easterly along said centerline 200 feet more or less to the centerline of Secondary State Highway No. 5-M to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT the following described tract of land: Beginning at a stone monument in the centerline of Permanent Highway No. 30 (also known as Interurban Avenue, Secondary State Highway No. 1-L), said monument being at a point of curve designated as Station 136 + 44.32 in Survey No. 1143G, and bei ng located North 8°52 '10" West, 462.32 feet more or 1 ess, and North 34°46'00'" West, 166.7 feet from the intersection of the centerline of said Permanent Highway with the south line of said Government Lot 10 (the meridian used being that of said survey) in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East W.M.; . thence North 60°40' West, 207.56 feet and South 28°05'00" .West 30 feet more or less to the southerly margin of said Highway and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINtdNG of the tract herein described; thence continuing South 28°05'00", 500 feet more or less to the west bank of the Green River (White River); thence westerly and northerly along said bank to an intersection with the northeasterly extension of the centerline of James Clark Road No. 622 (now known as the Renton Three Tree Point Road); thence northeasterly along said centerline extended to an intersection with the thread of said river; thence northerly along the thread of said river to an intersection with the south- westerly margin of Interurban Avenue; thence southeasterly along said margin, 450 feet more or less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. -6- TO: City of Tukwila 6200 SOuthcenter Boulevard Tukwila washington 98188 (208) 415-1800 Ciary L vanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM FROM: Tukwila City cou~.~ . Mayor Van DU~~I' April 17, 1986 DATE: SUBJECT: Council Request for Annexation and Deannexation Procedure I am forwarding the relevant annexation and deannexation procedure for the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment pursuant to the City Council's request. These procedures reflect the new boundary adjustment option granted to cities in the last State legislative session and steps three through five cannot be carried out until after the effective date on June 11, 1986. This is not anticipated to be a constraint, given the time required for finalizing ne90tiations and Boundary Review approval. The attached procedures have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Please contact Vernon Umetsu (433-1858) if you have any questions. ... -.... ..... Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation-Deannexation Procedures April 17, 1986 1. The Renton City Council and the Tukwila City Council adopt resolutions indicating a desire for certain areas of each City to be annexed by the other. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 2. Receive Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval. The BRB may hold its own independent public hearing. 3. A public hearing on the proposed annexation must be held by the annexing City Council. Thus, both Renton and Tukwila must hold a pub 1 i c heari ng on the proposed annexat i on act ions for the property owners in their respective annexation areas. Notice of a public hearing at which an annexing resolution is to be adopted shall be mailed to the owners of the property within the area proposed to be annexed in the same manner that notices of hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by a City as provided in RCW 35.43: Notice of the hearing upon a resolution declaring the intention of the legislative authority of a city or town to order an annexation shall be given by mail at least fifteen days before the day fixed for hearing to the owners or reputed owners of all lots, tracts, and parcels of 1 and or other property to be i ncl uded in the annexation, as shown on the rolls of the county assessor, directed to the address thereon shown. Adoption of an annexing resolution will start a thirty day protest period. If the owners of property in the annexation area equal in value toJ.~ percent or more of the total property value in the annexation area protest the annexation in writing to the annexing City Council within this thirty day period; then the annexation shall be restrained. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 5. If no or insufficient protest is received from property owners in the annexation area; then the annexation shall automatically become effec- tive at the end of the thirty day period. (RCW 35.10.217(2» Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner 4/17 /86 " RENTON CITY COUNCIL I l \ I ~ \ I April 111, 1986 City i.~ Clerk's offil ~ ~{' REFERRALS CITY ATTORNEY & INSURANCE SERVICE Gentry Claim for Damages Stevens Claim for Damages r: PLANNING COMMISSION Review ofp-I Designation on Compr.ehen'sive Plan J PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE' Monitor Progress on Renton ITukwila Boundary Adjustment Hearing Examiner Authority on Appeals, Section 11-3011 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Proceed with Negotiations for RentonlTukwila Boundary Adjustment,. UTILITIES COMMITTEE Rankin Request for Sewer ConnectionlAnnexation Honey Creek Interceptor Connection Fee WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE New Position for Building & Zoning Department Proposed Councilmanic Bond Issues Parking and Loading Ordinance;: Blencoe Rezone (1st reading 11/111/86) Unlimited Tax GO Refunding Bonds, 1986 (1st reading 11/111/86) Limited Tax GO Bonds. 1986 (1st reading 11/111/86) , ;1 '" n ',. " 'I i I I i ~ j , \ \ V ~ I' ,i' i Ii l i , PUBLIC HEARINGS I M 11/21/86 -Repeal of R-II zone and down zone of R-lizoned properties to R-3 11/21/86 -Transfer of cable television franchise from Group W Cable to T:CI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. i 11/28/86 -LID 326 Final Assessment Roll (continued from 11/7186) -NE 11th Street between Monroe and Union Avenue NE (", ' 5/12/86 -Honey Creek 75% Annexation. Rezone. and PPUD Hearing -NE' 27th Street (Devil's.,Elbow) " , '5/19/86 -Tri-Delt 75% Annexation -:East of Sunset Boulevard NE and Duvall .. Avenue NE Renton C lty Counc i1 4/14/86 Page six Consent Agenda continued 1"..-..,. ,~. " Trl-De It 75% AnnexatJon contInued I, ' .. ;..... .,/. I ,~ .l HoneY,:.~r.eek : Assoi: I a-I.es '75%. :-, .(: .. Anf'!~'x~ l,"on .... \R~iorie. " PPUD'Hear't'n' " .l' •• '." "I' ... -9 '\ R~OI4-85 (PPUD-015-84 , ·1 :'\ Honey f;eek In tercUltor Connect'ion Fee r CORRESPONDENCE Rankin Request for SeW-:r Connec to lion/ Annexat-.. on 1,1 JII \ rdi Ant i-Al('rt Ion PiCket\t ~ ;''1\ , , I \ I,' :1', .. 1 (('\ ( ./ ,,~ ..... . •• -.",1\ PI ayt line"Court Case'" ~;."'" Gene Coulon Park OLD BUS 'I NESS Commltt~e of the Whole Renton/Tukwi 1 a Bou;'da ~y' . I. Adjustment '(Referred 3/10/86) I· .-""- ) ) , . , 1 SE Renton~lssaquah Road, 600 feet east of Sunset Boulevard NE and Duvall Avenue NE; also recommended In accordance with RCW 35A.14.340 is consideration of departmental recommendation for G-l zoning on the site, Council concur. Policy Development Department requested Council set a publ ic hearing on 5/12186, to consider'the Honey Creek Associates 75% Annexation Petition and associated Rezone, File No. R-014-84, and Planned Unit Development, File No. PPUD-015-84, located southeast of NE 27th Street and east of Kirkland Avenue NE in the area known as "Devll1s Elbow." Council concur. Public Works/Utilities Department requested City-held latecomers agreement fee be established for sewer connections to Honey Creek Interceptor. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Letter was read from J. L. Rankin, Rankin Construction, requesting temporary sewer connection and annexation for property located at 10404 SE 166th, Renton, due to septic system failure (owner, John Young); neighbor Monty Farrell has agreed to provide easement. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Letter was read from Baird M. Bardarson, M.D., Cedar River CI inic, 4300 Talbot Road South, requesting pol ice response to anti-abortion picketers trespassing and harrassing patients at the clinic. Response from Mayor Shinpoch indicated that a distinction must be made between outright trespassing and First Amendment guarantees; parking lots, even on private property, have a quasi-publ ic status; and police are instructed to observe, ascertain that demonstrators are not impeding traffic, creating a safety problem, physically denying ingress/access or otherwise breaking the law. Demonstrators will be cited if they engage in unlawful behav i or. Card from Velma Evans expressed appreciation to the City for pursuing the Playtime court case and providing citizens with. useable, lovely Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park as well as other park programs. Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole report recommending that the Policy Development Department proceed with negotiations with the City of Tukwila to adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary line and adopt the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. Reasons for the change are: 1) Irregular line creates identity confusion for businesses; 2) Lack of control of development approval process may impact adjacent land use compatibility; 3) Difficulty in providing util ities and publ ic services to area bisected by the railroad. Under the proposa.!. Tukwila would gain 45 parcels (101 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $14 million. Renton would gain 11 parcels (114 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $3 million. While Renton would initially lose $36,000 per year in 1986 tax dollars, projected development of the Burlington Northern site south of 27th Street West should accrue a tax benefit to Renton in the near future. The cost of two railroad crossing ptojects. one with the extension of 27th Street West (Strander Boulevard). and the other on SW 43rd, would be shared equally by the two jurisdictions . \ Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page seven Old Business continued Commi ttee of the Whole Renton/Tukwi I a Boundary Adjustment continued Proposed Councilmanic Bond Issues Renton would assume full costs for the P-I Channel and Tukwila would assume costs of Green River dike construction and maintenance. Newly constructed utility lines in the area north of 43rd Street between the tracks and the Green River would remain under Renton ownership and propert ies would coni: inue"to" be assessed the monthly service charges by Renton. The' Committee recommended that the Policy Development Department proceed with negotiations with Tukwila and prepare proper annexation legislation. Further, the Committee recommended that this item be referred to the Planning and Development Committee, for regular monitoring and progress reports. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. Councilmen Stredicke and Trimm spoke against the motion due to concerns related to annexing property served by Renton utilities to another city. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: MATHEWS, HUGHES, KEOLKER, REED. 3 NAYS: TRIMM, CLYMER, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole report regarding proposed Councilmanic Bond issues. The report stated that due to current low interest rates, pending adverse tax changes, and cost reduction when combining issues, Finance Director Clements had recommended that Council consider bonding certain projects: 1 ) 2) 3) 4) 5) Limited General Obligation Bond Refunding Golf Course Financing Library ,Remodel & Equipment Rental Purchase of Panther Creek Wetlands and Street Sweeper Phase I of Golf Course CIP $2,140,000 3,965,000 1,600,000 180,000 821,000 Items I and 2 are currently funded by Councilmanic Bonds. Thus only items 3, 4 and 5 would increase the bonded indebtedness by $2.6 million. The Administration provided a further listing of capital projects which may require funding by 1990. The project receiving the most interest and Council discussion was the Community Center. It has a projected cost of $5 mill ion, with approximately half that amount to be recovered from the sale of Mother's Park. The Committee recommended that Council approve the Councilmanic bond issues as suggested by staff, with the additional sale of $2.5 million for the Community Center. It was further recommended that the Administration be authorized to open formal negotiations on the sale of Mother's Park; and that the matter of Councilmanic Bonds be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT.* For the record, Mayor Shinpoch reported that Finance Director Clements had provided Council members with a complete fiscal report at the Committee of the Whole meeting on 4/10/86 outlining the impact of the bond issue with the addition of the Community Center. Council has reviewed the report, the matter was discussed at length, and it appears Counc iii s satisfied that sufficient funds exist to proceed. A consensus was reached that bonds should be issued rather than placing the matter on an election ballot. Council members are fully aware that an expenditure of this magnitude will preclude some other capital items. Regarding Project No.4, street sweeper, Councilman Clymer felt that consideration should have been given to contracting street sweeping services with a private company rather than purchasing the equipment. Regarding the decision to finance a community center with Councilmanic Bonds, he supported the Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page eight Old Business continued Proposed Counci lmanic Bond Issues cont inued Recess concept of a community center, but indic;ated his opinion that the proposal should be placed on the ballot for approval by t'he public. If approved, funding could be provided from G.O. Borids rather than Counci lmanic Bonds. Other c:apital improvements that he felt have a higher priority at this time were court I ~d :.,il space, which are essential to operation of the CitY'1 "oun·.llman Clymer stated that an abundance of park facilities' has alreadY been provided in this city, and, in view of recerit economic upturn, passage of a bond issue by the voters would I be 1 ike 1 y. ~ I Council President Mathews noted that If Mother's Park is sold, those funds must be used for recreational facilities, and thel Counci 1 prefers that they be used to fund a community :enter.1 She questioned disposition of those funds if a ballot Issue to fund a community center failed to gain approval of the I voters. City Attorney Warren reviewed disposition of the fun'ds , either to commence construction of the center or be deposited to await use at a later date. Councilwoman Keolker agreed with Counci'lman Clymer's concerns'l. , While she was not opposed to a community center, she questioned timing and method of funding by Councilmanic Bonds since it I would increase the bonded indebtedness of the City by $2.5 million, therebY reducing the remaining bonding capacity for 1986 to $325,000. Although that capacity would be increased after January, 1987 to $1.78 mill ion and to $3.8 mill ion in I January, 1988, funding for other capital improvements would I not realistically be available until 19~1O. Mrs. Keolker noted that considerable funding has been expended recently for parkl- type facilities: golf course, Cedar River trail, Senior Cente'r, and improvements to neighborhood parks. She felt that before' giving up every other CIP in the City between now and 1990, I , evaluation of other needs should occur. These projects were I 1 isted as: Cedar River Corridor-Revital ization Program, space! studies at City Hall for Police Department, jail and Municipall Court, parking lot space, Fire Master Plan, Oakesdale-Grady I street connection, staffing increases to accommodate buildingl activity and loop enforcement, and pol ice/fire training I facility. In addition, she noted, the City is faced with ' reduced federal funding in the amount of $700,000 this year. I Councilwoman Keolker urged that the matter of a community i center be reviewed in the proper format by accepting publici comment on the Capital Improvement Program through the budget! process. I I Counci 1 President Mathews indicated that informat ion previouslly compiled for the community center ballot: issue in 1984 is current with minor exceptions. She reviewed alternatives ' for relieving City Hall space problems by relocating Park Department staff from the annex and liberty Park community building activities to the new community center, releasing those facilities for other uses such as a children's 1 ibrary.1 I Councilman Hughes recalled that previous Councils had approve~ the Senior Center, trail system, and Fire Station despite ! defeat of those issues at the polls by voters. He felt that I Council would be doing the City a service by providing a I commun i ty cen te r for res i dent s. Al t hou~lh Counc i 1 woman Keo 1 ke r agreed, she felt that funding from sources other than Councilmanic Bonds should be sought. Upon Council inquiry, Finance Director Clements explained pending tax law changes which may have a negative impact on the abil ity of cities to issue certain types of tax exempt , bonds, resulting in reduced market for tax exempt securities.i, Vote on the met Ion to concur in the Comneittee of the Whole report was taken: *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 10:58 p.m. TO: of Tukwila 6200 South center Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 455-1800 Gary L. vanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Tukwila City Council FROM: Mayor Gary Van Dusen DATE: April 14, 1986 SUBJECT: Current Status of Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment The Renton City Council, Committee of the Whole, has reviewed the proposed boundary adjustment and forwarded an initiating resolution to a regular Council meeting with positive recommendation on April 10, 1986. The vote recommending passage was 4-3. A Tukwila version of the initiating resolu- tion has been attached (see Attachment A). The following steps summarize the actions necessary to proceed \,ith the boundary adjustment: 1. Adopt the annexing/de-annexing resolution (see Attachment A). 2. Hold a public hearing on the annexation ordinance. 3". Receive Boundary Review Board approval. 4. Enact annexing ordinance. ATTACHMENT A ~~~, ~ ~ . . . 190&' CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ___ --'-__ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF RENTON TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary be- tween the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying .the common boundary would be in the mutual interest 'of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning respon- sibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. Section 2: The' City of Tukwila hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Renton. Section 3: The City of Tukwila intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Renton and described as follows, to-wit: Renton. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Section 4: The City of Tukwila formally requests that the City of Renton annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Tukwila and described as follows, to wit: Tukwi lao See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof' as if fully set forth. upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Section 5: The City of Tukwila recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Tukwila intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However, the actual agreements between the two cities wi 11 be determined in future nego- tiations. 1. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the rai lroad tracks should be shared equitably be- tween the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. In pursuit of this guideline, both cities agree to designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each city's Transportat i on Improvement Plan, and each prov i de one-ha 1 f of the local funds needed to match an BO percent, federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry, the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire District #1) should be determined. In addition, the processing plant/crusher on the west side on Monster Road S.W. should transfer from Tukwila to Renton. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capa- city, the local share of project costs should be divided equitably between Renton and Tukwi lao The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South 1BOth Street to the state highway system and support this road improvement in the same manner as the Strander/S.W. 43rd Street railroad crossing. 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South IBOth Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-I81) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and and City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing util ities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operations and maintenance. The City of Tukwila should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located on the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. B. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improve- ments to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd and,I-405. 9. Construction and maintenance of the Green River dikes should reflect that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that they would still significantly benefit from this flood control program. · . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this ____ day of __________ , 1986. Joe H. Duffie, Council President APPR0VED AS TO FORM Attest/Authenticated Office of the City Attorney By: -------------------Maxine Anderson, City Clerk PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: RESOLUTION NO. _______ _ I " .' ' ·OUt. en no.-.. ___ _ ATTACHMENT A WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO, ______ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF RENTON TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary be- tween the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and· WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning respon- sibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. Sect i on 2: The City of Tukwil a hereby es tab 1 i shes intent to real i gn and simplify its common boundary with the City of Renton. Section 3: The City of Tukwila intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Renton and described as follows, to-wit: Renton. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the.City of Sect ion 4: The City of Tukwi]a formally requests that the City of Renton annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Tukwila and described as follows, to wit: Tukwila. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof' as if fully set forth. upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of " .' i .j / I I f . :) _= IW I Section 5: The City of Tukwila recognizes that there are certain issues of concer~ to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Tukwila intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However, the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future nego- tiations. 1. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equitably be- tween the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila 5A8ijlE1 agree to monitor development and, as d~velopment warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. In pursuit of this guideline both cities agree to deSignate this roail improvement as a high priority item on each city's Trans ortat i on 1m rovement Plan, and each rov' e one-h~ 1ff 'the oca nds e 0 ma car ent f deral f this ~~ifii=m~p~r~0:ve5m~e~nitil~r:o~ectt['jj:e:WI f~f]eId~e:r]aiIl :f~U n din i sun avail ab 1 e then "" . 1 n n as necessary • . Black River Quarry, the appropriate urisdiction services (currently provided by ,.~,-,,-~t.rict #1) oposed grade separated cross i ng Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capa- city, the local share of project costs should be divided equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South IBOth Street to the state highway system and SUKpgrt this rOad improvement in the same manner as the Strander/S.W. 3rd Street railroad crossing. 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel which wi 11 be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. (III, .... +- 5. The Cit nton's share of dike n River p s ou d be a Juste ecause the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South IBOth Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and and City 'of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operations and maintenance. The City of Tukwila should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of r-40jrWhen S~h serv.i~ is needed. surcha~ gf~mWrofjlWh~;::'~~ a .... 'S'Du. 9 aQPQxat 1 9p area s h' on. B. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improve- ments to SR-IBI between S.W. 43rd and 1-405. :i )" . ., .,1 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a I> ! regular meeting thereof this ____ day of __________ , 1986. Joe H. Duffie, Council President APPR0VED AS TO FORM Attest/Authenticated Office of the City Attorney By: -------------------Maxine Anderson, City Clerk PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: FILED WITH TH£ CITY CLERK: RESOLUTION NO. ____ _ . , EXHIBIT A (Legal description of lands to be received from Renton.) '~' ., " EXHIBIT B (Legal description of lands to be given to Renton.) \ . :' ", .... ':~ ..... ' ~ " , c .... ? . : "~I: .: •• :','" • . '.! ~:£ .. ' .'.","r,: •..•.. _ ~ _, ' ....• cort,rilittee ofWhola wants'planners" to straighten' border with TUkwila .. . . ' '.'; '. " : " .'. " ,. 'By RANDY BLACK . .correspondent Renton and Tukwila took another ... step toward straightening a zig·zag· ·.border between them Thursday ·'night. The Renton Committee of" the 'Whole voted 4·2 to authorize the .. Planning Department staff to negotiate a plan that would reset the · .. line to the east grading of the · Burlington Northern tracks' that , paraUel the Green River. I 'fWe're basically gotng to:convert · a sawtooth line to a straight line,". · Renton Policy Development Direc· .. tor Larry.Springer told the commit- tee. The border currently;crosses the tracks in six locations~ making for confused zoning, and difficult" utility connections and 'police and · fire response, city officials say; The , proposed' new line would move two pieces of land on the east side, totaling 101 acres, to Tukwila, and two chunks on the west side, totaling 114 acres, to Renton. ' -j . . The major problems with the current border involve community identity, zoning and accessibility, Springer said. UBusinesses on the · west side of the Green River natur-. aUy identify with Tukwila because ·of that city's proximity, yet many of them are in the city of Renton," he .-said. Both cities are also concerned · about keeping land use compatible. · A l~rg.e piece of the disputed proper- ty IS In Renton's Valley Industrial , Area, yet it is inside the Tukwila city limits and subject to Tukwila's zon- · ing. "Tukwila is concerned abOut development of the West Valley Highway,n Springer said, "which is a very high-visibility area for. the city. They don't want Renton to · make land-use decisions that would, : adversely impact that community." The difficulties of providing utilities across the railroad is still another prime concern, especially ,with a piece of Burlington Northern :. property east of the proposed bor- .' der between the paths of Strander .' . - '~' . -, .' .. :', t .: "\, ... and Minkler Boulevards, . Spring", said· '. .' .' The property is in the midst of th, VaUey Industrial Area, yet insid, the borders of Tukwila. Difficultie . in extending sewer and water line .. 'e. ",.,-1: ; ',,, .".", ... across the tracKs have. k~~ .. __ ';~;'''';';';';;;;''';'';;'~'''-·I property largely u'!.developed: Re • nton utilities are available in th • street adjacent to the property; bu city policy does not allow them to b, extended into Tukwila. It also is , difficult area for fire and polic, crews' to reach,' since the neares railroad crossings are at 43rd an. 16th streets, Springer said. . 'RENTON"" .' . . The plan to'straightim the borde, still has several steps to go througl before it becomes final. The first is, . similar Committee of the ~~ meeting in Tukwila Monday night. Tukwila agrees ""ith the pro~>-. the planning staffs of the two citle, will negotiate an ordinance to change the border. . . .' il The new border would then go to the Boundary Review' Board for hearings and approval. Ten house- holds in the affected area wou J have to vote on the change. . Finally, both cities. would have' .. approve· annexation and "de-annexa· 'tion'resolutions for the properties. The plan still has a few problem, that have to be worked out by the planning department staffs. Rento! . . .' has pl~ced a high priority on rail 'road' crossings at Strand'e, .-Bouleyard, connecting with.3iU . ' . A venue, and at 43rd.A venue. • neil Z .. .. priority and costs of the crossing c which would have been exclusivel , North. ;'R'enton's responsibility with the eu ~ . planners want Tukwila to Shareth~ .5 ~ rect borders. "C P d bo Renton would take over' sole con· i '_WOI ropose undary . struction of the pol drainage cansl I _ ••• ExIsting boundary which currently runs through bQii 1 ' '. • cities. Renton would also maintain I their utility coilliection's for an al· \ .. \ 111",,_ ·ready-developed section just nonb ------------of 43rdAvenue between the Green .1 " . . KENT' . River and the Burlington Northern , .• ', . . tracks. Springer said that TukwUI, M h . ' planners had agreed· to all four I ap SOWS present, propOSBd border between Renton, Tukwila: proposals, . , 'J,.' ': 1 • : 1 ,! .)., . · . RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT STUDY INTRODUCTION It has been long recognized by the administrations of Renton and Tukwila that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency services to those areas of each city cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of-way. with the approval of both city councils. the administrations of each city have been cooperatively exploring the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15. 1985. and again on October 28. 1985. various department directors from both cities met and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the implementation of this proposed boundary adjustment. Both cities also conducted a meeting with affected residents and property owners on January 30. 1986 to explain the effects of the proposal. Prior to the meeting. Renton and Tukwila staff put together a package of information detailing the proposal in order that those affected would be able to come to the meeting prepared for discussion. At the meeting the purpose for proposing the adjustment was explained and some additional background material reviewed. The procedure involved was then detailed and the meeting was opened for questions. Of the five people in attendance. all were property owners. The chief concern of these people was the effects on their existing land uses should the adjustment be approved. Other questions involved the costs of improvements in the area. The fiscal costs and benefits to the City of Renton for this proposal are discussed below. FISCAL COSTS AND BENEFITS The Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment will carry some implicit costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are summarized in the table below and then discussed in further detail. - 4 -( " , TABLE A Fiscal Costs and Benefits of the Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustme1t JI~ Y\~ S.W. 43rd Street Improvement ($3 million ® 112 of the 20% local share) Frank Zepp Bridge Improvement Strander-S.W. 27th Street Connector ($7 million ® 112 of the 20% local share) Water and Sewer Service Fire and Police Service Proportion of Green River dike improvement costs to be transferred from Renton to Tukwila TOT AL ADDlTlONAL COST Proportion of the P-l Wetland Acquisition Transferred from Tukwila to Renton Additional Annual Tax Revenue Gditional cob $ 300.000 Not Available $ 700.000 Minor Transfer Costs o Not Available $1.000.000 $ 300.000 $ 347.727 Table A summarizes eight subject areas which have a potential for being significantly affected: land area. revenue base. roads. utilities. fire service. police service. Green River Management plan and implementation. and development of the P-I drainage channel. The positive and negative effects of the proposed boundary adjustment are discussed in greater detail below. Land Area ~ Approximately 60 percent of the area to be given up is railroad right-of-way or lands located between railroad rights-of-way. The remaining/ itrelIS are largely Renton would be acquiring 114.01 acres of land~giving up 101.65 acres of land. exclusive of S.W. 43rd Street and the West Valley Highway.' office/commercial/industrial ~ along the West Valley Highway. There are a few ~ ~ small. vacant parcels \ in the Office/commerCial/industri~1 reas and) infilling through 'l\ additions may be possible. i" fl-.i\s;.~, <rwe)' / rt )/tM' ,,"" "I Revenue Base C." :!~~ ~~ ~ \c"~f ~\::~ ~ t;~Je-)~1J Renton would be acquiring approximately $2.879.745 and giving up $14.378.100. Although ~ the immediate result would be a net loss for the city. the potential assessed valuation for the bulk of the acquired property (98.73 acres) amounts to $30.921.882 if developed to a similar scale as the comparable Koll Business Park to the east. This would yield tax revenues of approximately $347.727.08 annually at the 1985 tax rate of $11.24534 per ~. ~~ ',$1.000 valuation of land and improvements. '----'iVjm ) "~I; -5-e::r~ • Roads The proposed boundary adjustment will require Tukwila to become responsible for the following actions: I. / • 2. 3. S.W. 43rd Street Improvements: Acquire 1,130 feet of S.W. 43rd Street between West Valley Highway and the -ea·stern edge orille Burlington':'Northern Railroad right-of-way. S.W. 43rd Street has recently been improved by the City of Renton using a local improvement district (L.I.D.). It is envisioned that Tukwila would assume ownership of this roadway, two railroad signals and other Improvements a~t. Renton would remain responsible for the L.I.D. and its administration. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) strongly recommends that Tukwila make a policy commitment to the eventual improvement of the S.W. 43rd Street railroad crossing which would become the responsibility of Tukwila. RPW has already developed engineering plans for a $3 million undercrossing. Both staffs . .J I agree that a 50-50 division of local costs is reasonable. --:;:: ~ :~~ dklJ _ The traffic signal at SR-181 and 180th Street ~ probably ~ssigned~s the responsibility of Kent by the Department of Transportation. '-h~uld be a cost of $2,000 to $3,000 annually for maintenance to that city. No cost sharing is anticipated. _ I Frank Zepp Bridge: ~ -,,,, ~G <;, Acquire one half of the Frank Zepp Bridge, giving Tukwila full ownership of the bridge. The Frank Zepp Bridge was built circa 1970 and will soon have to be improved to provide more capacity for the additional traffic due to the South 188th Connector. With full acquisition of the bridge, Tukwila would be required to provide the full local portion of improvement costs instead of sharing It with the City of Renton. Full ownership of the bridge would ease the administration of improvements since Tukwila would no longer be subject to Renton's road/bridge improvement priorities. 4. Acquire responsibility for any right-of-way acquisition and improvement involved in the eastward extension of Strander Boulevard to S.W. 27th Street. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) strongly recommends that Tukwila make a commitment in city policy to continue the acquisition of right-of-way for the eventual connection of Strander and S.W. 27th and take no actions which would preclude the development of this connection. A current development proposal for the parcel immediately to the east of the Strander/SR-181 intersection includes dedication of the required road right-of-way to the Puget Power parcel. This would still leave Tukwila responsible for completing the road connection across the Puget Power right-of-way and two railroad tracks. -6 - • Strander Boulevard is currently improved to the Tukwila City limits. where it intersects with West Valley Highway. The City of Renton has been responsible for acquiring and improving right-of-way from this point. across private lands and over the railroad rights-of-way to connect with its existing road system. The City of Renton has been taking actions to develop the subject roadway in the most feasible manner. These actions have included extending the roadway system to the west as far as possible and denying development proposals for the property described above on the basis that it did not provide for the Strander extension as specified in the Streets and Arterials Plan. ' Both staffs agree that the StranderIS.W. 21th Street connection is important and should be pursued. This connection would involve an overpass above the railroad tracks which. with the boundary adjustment. would be located within the City of Tukwila and cost an estimated $1 million. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs between the two cities is reasonable. 5. Grady Way Bridge This bridge will continue to be built with no change in the way local costs are divided between Renton and Tukwila. The majority of future maintenance is anticlpated to be Tukwila's responsibility since its jurisdiction would be expanded to include most of the bridge. Utilities 1. There are no Tukwila water or sewer services provided on the land area to be given to Renton. 2. The RPW has recently completed improving sewer and water facilities in the North Vailey Business Park and will remain the provider of these services. Renton would retain ownership of the sewer and water facilities. Fees charged to these areas shall be the same as those charged to other areas within the City of Renton. Renton will have to amend Title III. Chapter 2 (Water Department), of the Renton City Code which sets water rates for areas outside the city limits at 1-112 times the basic city fee in order not to penalize those areas which. through no fault of their own, would be transferred to Tukwila. 3. The area at Strander east of West Valley Highway will be acquired by Tukwila. Tukwila already serves this area with water. The dairy farm area north of 1-405 is currently served with water by a Tukwila six inch line from the south and a Renton 12 inch line from the east. There is no sewer service to this area at present. although Renton has a collector just to the east. Fire Service "/ I' Tukwila already provides fire protection to the areas to be acquired under an "automatic response" mutual aid agreement. Medical aid is still provided by Renton. Acquisition of the subject areas by Tukwila would not require any additional personnel or equipment, according to the Fire Marshal. -7 - Police Service Renton does not respond to assistance calls e)(cept upon request by the Tukwila Police Department, nor does it patrol the subject areas at this time. Acquisition of the subject areas would not require additional personnel or equipment, according to the Police Chief. Green River Management Plan and Implementation The Renton Public Works Department recommends that Renton continue to carry its share of the study costs. However, construction costs for improvements should reflect that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that these areas had been assumed by Tukwila and that Renton wlll benefit from the flood control project. Development of the P-I Drainage Channel Tukwila Is currently contractuaily committed to assist with acquiring that proportion of a wetland which lies within the Tukwila City limits and is needed to develop the P-I drainage channel. This commitment is for appro)(lmately 10 percent of the cost of a 100 acre acquisition of Burlington Northern Railroad land to the east of the railroad tracks. A rough appraisal of the acquisition cost is $3 million: making Tukwila's potential share at $300,000. All of the subject wetland area would fall within Renton's jurisdiction with the boundary adjustment. The Renton Public Works Department will recommend that Renton assume Tukwila's share of the acquisition costs since it would be owned by Renton. -8- • .. IMPACTS The major perceived impacts of the proposed boundary change to property owners would be in the area of property taxes. Listed in the table below are the individual levies of the various taxing districts located in the affected code areas of the two cities: Taxing Districts State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Services City of Renton City of Tukwila School District No. 403 Hospital District No. 1 TOTAL RATES Code 2110 (Renton) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 2.24799 .27673 $11.24534 (per $1,000) Source: King County Department of Assessments Code 2340 (Tukwila) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 $10.79573 (per $1,000) The levies for each city are identical with the exception of the individual city tax levy figures. The result is that an average tax bill would cost the property owner approximately $.40 more per $1,000 in Renton than it would in Tukwila. Other taxes levied by the City of Renton include: 1. Sales tax 8.1 %. 2. Utility tax 5%. Other tax levied by the City of Tukwila includes: 1. Sales tax 7.9%. The City of Renton also charges an annual fee for a business license. This license costs $40 a year or more depending upon the number of employees in the particular business. Tukwila also charges an annual fee for business licenses ranging from $50 a year and up depending upon the number of employees. ., ,;r -~ ... INTRODUCTION RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT STUDY Tukwila Planning Department Brad Collins, Planning Director Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner April 10, 1986 It has been long recognized by the administrations of Renton and Tukwila that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency services to those areas of each city cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of-way. With the approval of both city councils, the administrations of each city have been cooperatively exploring the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15, 1985, and again on October 28, 1985, various department directors from both cities met and reached a general understanding of ~hat each city considered important in the implementation of this proposed boun- dary adjustment. These elements have significant fiscal costs and benefits for the City of Tukwila which are discussed below. FISCAL COSTS AND BENEFITS --- The Tukwila-Renton boundary adjustment will carry some implicit costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are summarized in the table below and then discussed in further detail. I Renton/Tukwila Boun~ "/ Adjustment Apri 1 10, 1986 Page 2 TABLE A Fiscal Costs and Benefits of the Tukwila-Renton Boundary Adjustment Additional Cost S.W. 43rd Street Improvement ($3 million @ t of the 20% local share) Frank Zepp Bridge Improvement Strander-S.W. 27th St. Connector ($7 million @ t of the 20% local share) Water and Sewer Service Fire and Police Service Proportion of Green River dike improvement costs to be transfered from Renton to Tukwil a. TOTAL ADO IT roNAL COST Proportion of the P-l Wetland Acquisition Transferred from Tukwila to Renton Additional Annual Tax Revenue $ 300,000 Not Available $ 700,000 Minor transfer costs o Not Available $ 1,000,000 $ 300,000 $ 124,000 Therefore, it will require approximately six years of the additional revenue to equal the additional, known, costs to be incurred «$1,000,000 -$300,000)/$126,000). This does not include the additional pro- portion of dike improvement costs which would be shifted to Tukwi la from Renton which is not now known. Table A summarizes eight subject areas which have a potential for being significantly affected: land area, revenue base, roads, utilities, fire service, police service, Green River Management Plan and implementation, and development of the P-l drainage channel. The positive and negative effects of the proposed boundary adjustment are discussed in greater detail below. Land Area ---- Tukwila would be acqulrlng 101.65 acres of land, exclusive of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Highway, and giving up 114.01 acres of private land. , • Renton/Tukwila Boun,' y Adjustment April 10, 1986 Page 3 Approximately 60 percent of the area to be acquired is railroad right-of- way or lands located between railroad rights-of-way. The remaining areas are largely office/commercial/industrial areas along w. Valley Highway. There are a few small, vacant parcels in the office/commercial/industrial areas and infilling through additions may be possible. Approximately 99 acres of the 114 acres to be given up are in a very deve- lopable site, under Burlington-Northern Railroad ownership. This area is zoned M-l (Light Industry) and represents approximately 43 percent of all vacant usable lands in the City's commercial and industrial zones (total vacant usable ares is 232 acres). Revenue Base Tukwila would be acquiring approximately $14,378,100 and glvlng up $2,879,745. The net gain for the City is $11,498,355, which would yield tax revenues of approximately $124,133.14 annually at the 1985 tax rate of $10.79573 per $1,000 valuation of land and improvements. Roads The proposed boundary adjustment will require Tukwila to become responsible for the following actions: 1. Southwest 43rd Street Improvements: Acquire 1,130 feet of S.W. 43rd Street between West Valley Highway and the eastern edge of the Burl ington-Northern Rai lroad right-of-way. S.W. 43rd Street has recently been improved by the City of Renton using a local improvement district (L.I.D.). It is envisioned that Tukwila would assume ownership of this roadway, two railroad signals and other improvements at no cost. Renton would remain responsible for the L.I.D. and its administration. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would strongly recommend that Tukwila make a policy commitment to the eventual improvement of the S.W. 43rd Street railroad crossing which would become the respon- sibilityof Tukwila. RPW has already developed engineering plans for a $3 million undercrossing. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs is reasonable. 2. The traffic signal at SR 181 and 180th St. would probably be assigned as the respons i bil ity of Kent by the Department of Transportat ion. This would be a cost of $2,000 to $3,000 annually for maintenance to, that city. No cost sharing is anticipated. Renton/Tukwil a Bounc' I Adj us tment Apri 1 10, 1986 Page 4 3. Frank Zepp Bridge: Acquire one-half of the Frank Zepp bridge, giving Tukwila full ownership of the bridge. The Frank Zepp Bridge was bui 1t circa 1970 and will soon have to be improved to provide more capacity for the additional traffic due to the South 188th Connector. With full acquisition of the bridge, Tukwi la would be required to provide the full local portion of improvement costs instead of sharing it with the City of Renton. Full ownership of the bridge would ease the administration of improve- ments since Tukwila would no longer be subject to Renton's road/bridge improvement priorities. 4. Acquire responsibility for any right-of-way acquisition and improvement i nvo 1 ved in the eastward extens i on of Strander Bou 1 evard to SW 27th St. The Renton Public Works Department (RPW) would very strongly recommend that Tukwila make a commitment in city policy to continue the acquisi- tion of right-of-way for the eventual connection of Strander and S.W. 27th and take no actions which would preclude the development of this connection. A current development proposal for the parcel immediately to the east of the Strander-SR 181 intersection includes dedication of the required road right-of-way to the Puget Power parcel. This would sti 11 leave Tukwila responsible for completing the road connection across the Puget Power right-of-way and two railroad tracks. Strander Boulevard is currently improved to the Tukwila City limits, where it intersects .with West Valley Highway. The City of Renton has been responsible for acquiring and improving right-of-way from this point, across private lands and over the railroad rights-of-way to con- nect with their existing road system. The City of Renton has been taking actions to develop the subject roadway as they could. These actions have included extending their roadway system to the west as far as possible and denying development proposals for the property described above on the basis that it did not provide for the Strander extension as specified in their Transportation Plan. Both staffs agree that the Strander/S.W. 27th St. connection is impor- tant and should be pursued. This connection would involve an overpass above the railroad tracks which, with the boundary adjustment, would be located within the City of Tukwila and cost an estimated $7 million dollars. Both staffs agree that a 50-50 division of local costs bet- ween the two cities is reasonable. Renton/Tukwila Bounr v Adjustment April 10, 1986 Page 5 5. Grady Way Bridge: This bridge will continue to be built with no change in the way local costs are divided between Renton and Tukwila. The majority of future maintainance is anticipated to be Tukwila's responsibility since its jurisdiction would be expanded to include most of the bridge. Utilities 1. There are no Tukwila water or sewer services provided on the land area to be given to Renton. 2. The RPW has recently completed improving sewer and water facilities in the North Valley Business Park and will remain the provider of these services. Renton would retain ownership of the sewer and water facili- ties. Fees charged to these areas shall be the same as those charged to other areas within the.City of Renton. Renton will have to amend its ordinance which sets water rates for areas outside the city limits at 1i times the basic city fee in order not to penalize those areas which, through no fault of their own, would be transferred to Tukwila. 3. The area at Strander, east of West Valley Highway will be acquired by Tukwila. Tukwila already serves this area with water. 4. The dairy farm area, north of 1-405 is currently served with water by a Tukwila six inch line from the south and a Renton 12 inch line from the east. There is no sewer service to this area at present, although Renton has a collector just to the east. Fire Service Tukwila already provides fire protection to the an "automatic response" mutual aid agreement. vided by Renton. areas to be acquired under Medical aid is still pro- Acqui s it i on of the subj ect areas by Tukwi 1 a woul d not requ i re any add i- tional personnel or equipment, according to the Fire Marshal. Police Service Tukwila does not respond to assistance calls except upon request by the Renton Police Department, nor does it patrol the subject areas at this time. Acquisition of the subject areas would not require additional per- sonnel or equipment, according to the Police Chief. o • . Renton/Tukwila Bounr y Adjustment Apri 1 10, 1986 Page 6 Green River Management Plan and Implementation RPW wi 11 recommend that Renton continue to carry its share of the study costs. However, construction costs for improvements should reflect that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that these areas had been assumed by Tukwi 1 a and that Renton wi 11 benefi t from the flood control project. Development of the P-1 Drainage Channel Tukwila is currently contractually committed to assist with acqulrlng that proportion of a wetland which lies within the Tukwila City Limits and is needed to develop the P-1 drainage channel. This commitment is for approximately ten percent of the cost of a 100 acre acquisition of Burlington Northern Railroad land to the east of the railroad tracks. A rough appraisal of the acquisition cost is $3 million; making Tukwila's potential share at $300,000. All of the subject wetland area would fall within Renton's jurisdiction with the boundary adjustment. The RPW will recommend that Renton assume a fair share of Tukwila's current estimated acquisition costs since it would be owned by Renton. (RENT. TUK5,6) (#lB) • -1 -- Renton-Tl .1 a Boundary Adjustment ~lap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton LONGACRES Lands to Tukwil a Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila :+: o 2000' C; Glacier Park Company REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. April 9, 1986 Mr. Larry Springer Policy Development Director Policy Development Department The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Your Letter to W.W. Francis of April 2, 1986 Dear Larry: CITY Or RENTON APR 1 I!: 1986 I bel ieve it will be more expedient for you and me to address the track re- location issue directly without drawing the Railroad into the process at this time. I have in the past advised them of this and that is the reason you did not receive a reply to your original communication. I apologize for the misunderstanding. As I advised in my previous letter, I will continue to pursue a method by which we can each accomplish our desired goals. R. V. Mi u 11 i Senior Director Portfolio Development jmc6.05.71 cc: D. A. Cowles J. D. 0' Dell further assistance. 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 • Seattle, Washington 98104 • 206625-6300 c:; Glacier Park Company REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. April 7, 1986 Mr. Larry Springer City of Renton Policy Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Orillia Industrial Park Dear Larry: CITY OF RENTON APR q 1986 POLICY f'''''''LOPMF.NT n°F'". As I indicated to you in our last conversation, Glacier Park Company fully anticipates that development in and around the Orillia Industrial Park will continue in keeping with the office/hi-tech type of project we presently have underway for Boeing Electronics Company. This type of development will en- hance the area and should result in increased property value also. I'm sure you will want to point this out when presenting the boundary adjust- ment issue for consideration. I believe you will find that any discrepancy in property values between Tukwila and Renton at this time will be offset in the near term. On another related subject, I am continuing to pursue alternatives to the rail issue w;7scussed. I will advise you of my progress. , I . / • Sin~~i:ely. / rJjl/ /I I, ~ // 1/ R: V. Miulli Senior Direct r Portfolio Development jmc 6.05.67 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 • Seattle, Washington 98104 • 206625-6300 I -.. ;. 'i . ., i: OF lIASRINcT6N.·' • follows, ,;'.-''''. of th1a chapter. f : , ";" , .. .. l ... } or being acqui ! O[ lessor or -"', ling. ne .. ~ASHING'1'ON. to chapter by Rat1"'" .,.peeiflecl ··the. ,condi Hona ',of "ita '-._-~. ' ~ -.' . "ti,lPlI'~0II~,,~D"~!lIh'.<o'!411.an'0&.·.' , .. ,. cOunty, d ty. or town may be i!iIIil",ecI":q~'ly",f'n.,tb'.':~CC)8t:.; , D.f' .iJllproveaent8 ,that benetit· ,that 'o'~;~"e. ,PI'bl1c,:,wbo' .. ri.ll.,.-uae'· the devC!loPftlents ·"Hllin til" "a_,nt-,s~eilllbur"!",ent, ,::area '.' establisMd pursuant to RCW O(~"~':?,,·tIo;i!~.nty, "city; or tOWft cents f\Jr improvt'm~nts that " .. reimbursed. CITIES AND TOWNS-ANNEXATION , CHAPl'ER253 HOU1;E BILL NO. 1386 f'CT ~latb? to •. the., ann,!xatton o~ all or pIlrt of • c1ty Or , another Clty' Or town •. and &ll!ending RCW 35.10.217 • . ~. .. •.. '.~ ~ .. ~ -:' : .... ~. . ... :'.":'.~ .. :. ,-' " .~ ~~.' 1., Section 4, chapter a9, ; '", ;t· . " .. Lavs of 1969 ex. ses •• .os ~mended , 15. ,chapter Z81, La"s of >' : ' 1985. and RCW 35.10.217 are' eaCh read as follows • . 'I 'to ,..' ,," following metllods are avallable ~or the anne.ation of .11 or :, ;"t . ~ • '. Ch~ 253 REGULAR SESSION .a,--be--filed--with», which proposed annexation 1. approved by the legislative body of the clty ((to-be-aftftexedT--Saeh-le, •• lati.e-bod,. t.ft-t."rftr .. sha~l7-.b,--re8ei-1It~eftT--a"yt-ae») or town from which' the territory will be taken, may be submitted to the legislatlve bOdy 01 ~he city or town to which annexation is proposed j(cf-the-peeetpe--of aDeh--p~ttttoft-aftd-re~aest-the-~atter-i-e9*s%att¥e-bedy-to-indicate-b, resoltl t ton "whether-it-wii!-aeeept-the-propesed -s "".ex a t ie rt, -It""" t f -SOr en-what-terlfts,,:,--ff-stlch-resollltion-of'-the-sftftextft,-etty--ststes--that its--ie,tsiattye--bedr--is-fayorabiy-dispesed-tcward-sden-annexatton" the-le, •• lnti.e-body-of-the-eit,-te-be-aftftexed-.heli--.ab.'t--to~-the .~ters-"ift--saeh--territory--propesed--to-be-aftftexed,-the-qaest'on-of wh.ther-•• eh-territo.,-.hail-be-aftftexed-eftd-s.eh--other--pr~pos't*e". ft~--af'e-.. deelfted--appf'opf'i-aee),) • An annexation 'under this (mbs~c:tlon ah~ll otherwise conform with the requirements for and proe~dur~. of a petitlon and election method of annexing unlncorpor~ted t~rrltor~ u"d~r ~h~pter 35.13 RCN, except for the requlrem.nt tor th@ 4pprov~1 of th~ ~nnexation by the city or town from which th~ t~rrltory would be taken. (2) The legislative body ot / a city or town may on its own initiative by 'resolution indicate its desire to be annexed to a . city or town either in whole or In part, or the legislative body of a city or town proposing to annex all or part of another· city or town may initiate the annexation by adopting a resolution indicating that desire. In case such resolution is passed, such resol~t.ion ~h~il be transmitted to the o'ther· ~ffec·ted· clty ((~· .. -whieh':H--de"reo~-;;o--b. annexed7--and--~he--ie9*s~at*.e-eody-o!-saeh~e*ty-sh~~i-by-resoi~tioft " ' • , .' .,' ,',. .' • -• • t : \ i. iftdieate-whetlle·r-tt'-w*~l-aeeept-the-propesed-anne.ationi-and--*!--aoT on--what.:.-terms),) or tow~." The ann~xation'18 effectr;s' "if' th'e 'other c'ity: or' Addltio".J:In.text~ .• r8~indicated by' uDcledine; detetJona liy .UikM''''~· • ~ J ~:'the' annexation. <.i.iO"lutlon 18 adopt I ;~':tdtbill~. the area' ... ,Tm'tices of • hearinl .2 regul red to be mai~ . ROI •. An annexatior ::: ,:~·~r:'.u&1ect to review been approved by ,~~'~;'~(Il) ·((fft-the-e.e aaeh--oth~. --p'''pO'oH luch .' " .... Ch., 253 '.::' (3) ((fn-the-eY~ .. t--the.e--a.e-~ .. o-~q ... HHed--ehctora--resid ... g -'thi .. --.--p.rt-.of--.-cit,-which-aa.d-cit,-wiahea-to-h •• e-.""e.ed-to .t,> . ~th.-ie9bhthe-bod7-of-the~cH7-from-;'h*ch-the-terdtor:r-ia-to-be ~hdraWftT--'hia-~ee*sioft7-whieh-sha%%-be-b1-.a;er*~7--yete--of--sai~ , .~fied-.ot.,.-o'-a.*d-te.r*to.,-."d-ha"dled-aeco.d*"gl,-.. "de.--the '~e.-.ppt*eabl.-.eet*o"a-of-th'a-chapte.T . . ?' ,f--the--le"alati.e--bod:r--o'--the--cit,--to-whieh-a" .. e •• tio,,-ia · ...... ad-hdte.tea-.-.UI."9"e.a-to-.eeept-the-.""e •• t.o"7--th.ft--the .... tioft--of-.hether-... eh-t.r.itor:r-.hall-bo-.ftfte.ed-to-... eh-e't,-.ftd , , "eoae-.-pO.t-the.eof-."d--... eh--othe,--p.opOe't'ofte--ae--ere--deemed ..,..op"ate-ehaU-be-e .. baHt.d-to-the-eteeto.e-ill-the-ter"to.,-to-be eaaexed--b:r--the--l.,ielat'.e--bod:r-of-the-e't,-o.-pe.t-the.eof-to-be aafte.ed-at~all-el~etioll-.hieh-a .. eh-le9*eleti.e-bod,-ehall-eaaae-to--be called-for-that-p ... ""ae» The owners of proportx located in a city or 19vn may potition for ennexation to another city or town. An ~Qnexation under this subsection ahall conform with the requirements Addition. in text are indicated. by undedine; deletions by .tJ-iIt ...... 239 Ch. 253 CITIES AND TOWNS-CONSOLIDATION AND AN!NEJI(A1rI01~ FIRE PROTECTION AGENCIES CHAPTER 254 HOUSE BILL NO. 1388 AN ACT Relating to' fire.protection agencies annexation actions; adding new sections to chapter 35.10 RCW~ new sections to chapter 35.13 RCW; adding'new sections 52.04 RCW, adding new section~ to chapter 52.06 RCW; effective date: and declaring an emergency. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: . , .! NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to Rew to read as follows: -. . Upon the consolidation of two or more cities or cod~ ~. , employee of the fire department of the former city or cities vas at the time of consolidation employed exclusively or , '., .... in ;>erf:>rming pcwe:'s.-':u~!,es • .and fur.c't ions which .. . C"pe~E:lrmed by the fire depac,::ne:-.t :.f the -. :J consollda.ted .... ~r· , ··ci"ey, as the case :rlay ··~e, (2) _ill;' as a direct lot-A ~nsoiid.ation, ( •• ";':';'t!.t:,t:·, • ·c"fty~··-~r toWn, " , -.• -.e" e"p'_"~Y 0"_ ·.he··-~o-·r'm·:e'r·· ~;"lfYi'" be sepa:oa':'!,j ::;~ _ 10, and (j) Cltn ~~::f\:)r:n the duties :.frid ~:e~t , AddItiOna in text ant indicated by uMet1i ..... deletion. ,by .&pi'.n ·240 .' OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 % 'b ~'" ". o~ ~~ 'i1"t;o SEP~~~I!> BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 2. 19B6 W. W. Francis. Vice President Burlington Northern Railroad 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. Washington 98104-1105 RE: FEBRUARY 7th. 1986 CORRESPONDENCE Dear Mr. Francis: On February 7th I sent you the attached letter concerning a proposal to relocate the Burlington Northern tracks in the border area between Renton and Tukwila. Since that time. we have had a meeting with Mr. Robert Miulli of the Glacier Park Company to discuss some of their issues and concerns. Unfortunately. we have yet to hear from Burlington Northern. Senior staff at the City of Renton still believe that the relocation of the Burlington Northern tracks Is an Idea that has merit for both the City and Burlington Northern. However. given the rate at which development is occurring in the Green River Valley. we fear that the potential for serious consideration of this option is rapidly being eroded. Consequently. we would very much like to discuss this concept with either you or someone from yo r staff in the very near future. Attachment cc: Fred L. Branson Robert V. Miulli Dick Houghton Ron Nelson ;:.. • \ I OF RIi' ..\, 1--.?> f.... ...... ~ 0 u tJ·. + z THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 !DOE . f, dI. ~ o -11 '0. "b-2 &,~ "rEo SEP~f."'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 7. 1986 W. W. Francis. Vice President Burlington Northern Railroad 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. Washington 98104-1105 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 RE: BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN RENTON AND TUKWILA Dear Mr. Francis: Over the past several months. the Cities of Renton and Tukwila have been involved in serious negotiations to straighten out the irregular boundary line which currently exists between the two communities. The existing irregular city limits make it difficult and impractical to provide public utilities and emergencies services to private property in the area. much of which is owned by either Burlington Northem Railroad or Glacier Park Company. Moreover. large property owners. such as B.N .• with holdings on both sides of the boundary line. are required to comply with the regulations and approvai processes of two jurisdictions in order to develop their property. For these and other reasons. the Cities are pursuing a boundary line adjustment .. At this point. the proposal is to use the eastern edge of the B.N. RalJroad right-of-way as the new Renton-Tukwila city limits as per the attached map. This proposed adjustment wiil still leave substantial acreage owned by B.N. in the CIty of Tukwila. The acreage in question is located between the B.N. right-of-way and the Union PacifiC right-of-way to the west. These parcels are landlocked by the tracks. making access for users and emergency service vehicles difficult and sewer and water service expensive to provide. In addition. Renton would eventually like to extend S.W. 27th Street west to Strander Boulevard and to complete that vital east-west arterial. The separation between the Union Pacific and B.N. tracks makes an above or below grade crossing at 27th street an extraordinarily expensi ve project. v. , -. W. W. Francis Vice-president. Burlington Northern Railroad February 7. 1986 Page 2 In considering this problem. we thought about the possibility of relocating the B.N. tracks westward so that they are closer to and parallel with the Union Pacific tracks. This relocation would place all of the B.N. holdings in the City of Renton. improve traffic access to the property. and facilitate utillty services. It would also make the 27th Street railroad crosslnll more reasonable. Would Burllngton Northern be at all Interested In such a relocation? I have no Idea how much It would cost to relocate the tracks. but It might be that the Increased usability and added value of the currently landlocked property would offset the cost of the relocation. The Idea has merit from our perspective; and. if It is. of any interest to B.N .• we would very much like to sit down and discuss this issue with you or your staff. If you have questions or would like additional information. please call me at 235-2552. LMS:ss 15BlG Attachment cc: F. L. Branson. Prop. Dav. Spec .. B.N. D. A. Bell. Dir .• Engineering. B.N. R. V. Miulli. Sr. Dir .. Portfolio Dev .• Glacier Park .' " \ • , 1 ' G-1 L- H-1 11 7 B M-P TO: FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY March 20, 1986 Larry Springer Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98067 255-8878 DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZANETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF RENTON MAR 211986 POLICY m:"r::IJ'Pfl,.~t:.~T ncr,l, Dear Larry: The Inter-City Annexation Bill, HB 1386, has been passed and is on the Governor's desk. If the Governor signs it, then the bill can be used in the Renton-Tukwila annexation. ruly yours, LJWhw La~. Warren cc: Mayor Shinpoch i ~ '. Renton City Council 3/10/86 Page four Consent Agenda continued Bid Opening - Neighborhood Center Improves. Mother's Park Appraisal 'King County Drug Enforcement Fund Agreement LID 326 Final Assessment Roll CORRESPONDENCE Metro Transit Center OLD BUSINESS Suburban Cities Planning and Development _ CommJ.t,tee:--:-:\ LRenton::.lukwi I a.--:] ';::Ilounda ry Iss ue ' (Referred 10/28/85) Site Plan Review Ordinance Pub I ic Safety Comm it tee Merl ino Spec ial Permit/Review of Truck Traffic on N'E 3rd/4th SP-048-85 City Clerk reported bid opening 2/28/86 for Neighborhood Center Improvements; five bids; Engineer's estimate: $302,000.00. Refer to Community Services Committee. Finance Department requested appropriation in the amount of $2,500 for appraisal of Mother's Park property. Refer to Community Services Committee. Pol ice Department requested approval of an agreement to establ ish a King County Drug Enforcement Fund from fines collected from defendants convicted of drug violations. These funds would be I imited to activities aimed at facil itating enforcement of state statutes and county or municipal ordinances relating to controlled substances. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Publ ic Works/Design Engineering Department requested hearing date be set for 4/7/86 to review final assessments on Local Improvement District 326, roadway project on NE 4th Street between Monroe Avenue NE and Union Avenue NE. Council concur. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, CORRESPONDENCE FROM MICHAEL FLEMING, 11212-137TH SE, RENTON, OBJECTING TO LOCATION OF METRO TRANSIT CENTER NEAR ST. ANTHONY'S SCHOOL, BE REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. A status report regarding Suburban Cities meeting on 3/5/86 at which King County Executive Tim Hill was guest speaker was presented by Council President Mathews. Mayor Shinpoch has been reappointed to the Regional Issues Advisory Committee, and Suburban Cities has 'appointed a delegation to meet with both, Mayor Charles Royer and Executive Tim Hill. Volunteers are requested to serve on the King County Disabil ity Retirement Board, King County Sewage Disposal Board, and the Jail Advisory Committee. Speaker for the next Suburban Cities meeting in Bellevue will be State Representative Rod Chandler. Planning and Develoment Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report indicating that the matter of proposed boundary adjustment between Renton and Tukwila has been reviewed by the Committee. A number of issues, i.e. tax revenue, assessed valuation, util ity service and improvements to SW 27th Street and SW 43rd Street, must be examined further by Council. Therefore, the Committee recommended referral of this matter to the Committee of the Whole for review by the entire Council. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Chairman Keolker also advised that the Planning and Development Committee report regarding Site Plan Review Ordinance will be held one week until all Council members are in attendance. Publ ic Safety Committee Vice-Chairman Trimm presented a report regarding the Merlino Construction Company Special Permit for fill and grade and associated truck traffic review (File No. SP-048-85). A study conducted by the Traffic Engineering Department analyzing truck traffic on the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street corridor indicated that the Merl ino site generates only 1.9% of the total truck and bus traffic volume of 3,100 vehicles per day. The majority of the truck and bus traffic is being generated by activity in King County. Since measures to reduce truck impacts on that corridor must address all truck traffic, the Publ ic Safety Committee recommended that the City Council determine that truck traffic can no longer be regulated by placing a I imit on the number of truck trips per day as a condition of special permit approval; and the City Council direct the Building and Zoning Department to release the annual grading I icense to Merl ino Construction Company if the only remaining issue is truck traffic. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 10, 1986 RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ISSUE (10128/85) The Committee has reviewed an issue paper and background information prepared by the staff concerning a proposed boundary adjustment between Renton and Tukwila. There are a number of issues --such as tax revenue, assessed valuation, utility service, and improvements to S.W. 27th Street and S.W. 43rd Street --which must be examined further by the Council. Therefore, we recommend that this issue be referred to the Committee-of-the-Whole for review by the entire City Council. ~".Z<!!~""--""., Richard Stredicke John Reed . cre""vf~~~ '. /....-4. ..... () z C> g, OF RI; ~"" 0 Z ~ fa" 0-9. ~'l- "11"1;0 SEP"~~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 5, 1986 TO: Mayor Shinpoch THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM City Council Members FROM: Larry M. Springer Policy Development Director SUBJECT: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Status Report and Issue Paper For the past several months, the Planning Department staff from both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila have been investigating the possibility of straightening the common boundary between the two jurisdictions. At present, the city limits are highly irregular as is shown on the attached map. The proposal, as described in detail in Attachment Ill. is to adopt the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. The adjusted corporate limits wlll substantially improve or resolve the several problems which result from the existing irregular border line. Problem Statement Straightening the boundary line between Renton and Tukwila is an idea which has been discussed for more than a decade. Interest in this process stems from several difficult problems. First of all, the existing irregular line makes it very difficult for the citizens and property owners to identify with the city of which they are legally a part. Businesses on the west side of the Green River naturally identify with Tukwila because of that city's proximity, yet many of them are actually in the City of Renton. Andy's Tukwila Station restaurant is the best example of this concern. The reverse situation will exist when the Burlington Northern property develops in the midst of Renton's Valley Industrial Area but with a Tukwila address. A second and related problem concerns land use and the development approval process. Renton has taken several significant steps to control the quality of the development which is being proposed for the Valley Industrial Area. Unfortunately. one of the major property holdings in the Valley is currently in the City of Tukwila and is subject to that City's zoning code and land use approval process. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan for the area is Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 2 based on a rather different concept, which is not necessarily compatible with the concept adopted by the Renton City Council for the Valley. Likewise, Tukwila is very concerned about the type and style of development which is occurring along West Valley Highway. This is a high visibility corridor for Tukwila, and development which is not compatible with their Land Use Plan could result in significant adverse impacts for that community. Third, several of the large private property owners have to contend with the codes and land use approval process in both cities because the irregular city limits cut across their holdings. In most cases, this situation would yield a fragmented and poorly designed project. The fourth issue concerns the ability of the two jurisdictions to provide necessary utjlities and public services. The railroad tracks, for example, represent a substantial barrier for the extension of sewer and water lines. This may be one of the major reasons that the Burlington Northern property in the Valley Industrial Area has not yet been developed. Renton utilities are in the street adjacent to the property: but, because the property is in Tukwila, the services are not available. Furthermore, the response time for emergency service vehicles is severely reduced because there are only two railroad crossing points, one at 43rd Street and the other at 16th Street. Given the location of railroad crossings and the irregular boundary, the emergency response time from Renton to locations such as Andy's Tukwila Station is unacceptable. The boundary line adjustment would resolve this problem and significantly improve the availability and cost of providing emergency services for citizens in both jurisdictions. The Process The annexation and de-annexation process that will be required to adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary is described in detail in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 35.10). Basically, there are four steps in the process. The first is to have both City Councils adopt separate resolutions which mirror one another. Renton's resolution would indicate a willingness to annex specific property in Tukwila and request that Tukwila be willing to annex specific properties in Renton. The second step is for both cities to request Boundary Review Board approval. Third, the proposed boundary line adjustment has to be approved by a majority vote of the registered voters in the affected area. There are less than ten households involved in the Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment area. The final step is to conduct an annexation ordinance public hearing and at a later date enact the ordinance if that is the desire of the respective city councils. These procedures are spelled out in detail in Attachment 112. The Planning Directors from both cities have met on several occasions to discuss potential problems associated with this proposal. In addition, there were meetings between staff from the respective Mayor's Offices, the Police and Fire Chiefs, the Public Works Directors, and a citizens' meeting to which residents and property owners in the affected area were invited to attend. Based on those discussions, the following issues have been identified as important to Renton including recommendations for appropriate commitments to resolve. If the adjustment is approved, the City of Renton will relinquish 101.65 ac~ 45 parcels with an assessed valuation of $14,378,loo.~~~rn, the City will annex acres in..rt 1/ parceis with an assessed valuation of $2, : . Concern has been expressed that the City of Renton will be realizing a net loss in assessed valuation of $1 I ,6a3:;:J8S, which is 'f"f'83SS" ) " 't Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 3 3S,SS-O.IS REVISION the equivalent of $3(~ in property taxes at the 1986 levy rate of 3.09176 per $1,000. However, one could argue that the losf valuation is temporary. The majority of the property Renton would acquire in this process is undeveloped Burlington Northern land. These holdings are currently being assessed at approximately $1.00 per square foot but they have great development potential. When these parcels are developed as manufacturing and office park uses, similar to the land uses on adjacent properties, then the City should expect a significant increase in the assessed valuation and resulting property tax revenue. Neighboring fully developed properties are assessed at approximately $7.00 per square foot. If even a portion of the Burlington Northern property is developed. the City will more than offset the assessed valuation lost by the boundary line adjustment (see attachment 113): The second issue that surfaced concerns an area Renton would be relinquishing to Tukwila just north of 43rd Street between the Green River and the BN railroad tracks. Renton installed the sewer and water utilities. which have allowed this area to develop as warehousing and low intensity office uses. The Renton Public Works Director would like to retain ownership of those utilities and continue to operate and maintain them for the benefit of existing property owners and businesses. Rather than undermine the intent of the boundary line adjustment. staff from both cities recommend that Tukwila proceed to annex the subject area and that Renton continue to own the utilities and provide service through an interlocal services agreement with the City of Tukwila. The assumption is that the utility surcharge normally imposed on out-of-city subscribers would not be imposed in this unique instance. The third issue involves two road improvements that are perceived to be critical by the City of Renton. Dne project is the extension of 27th Street west to the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. At present, the entire corridor for the 27th Street extension is within Renton. and we are responsible for the total cost of construction and the land use approval process which will likely trigger the project. If this corridor is annexed by Tukwila. Renton loses control of this vitally necessary street linkage with potentially serious consequences for the circulation system in the Valley Industrial Area. To avoid this problem, the staffs from both cities recommend that the 27th Street extension project be assigned top priority in the Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) of both jurisdictions. This project currently has top priority in Renton but has only moderate priority in Tukwila. In addition. staff recommends that the cost of right-of-way acquisition and road construction be shared by the two jurisdictions on an equal basis, since the completed street linkage will improve traffic circulation for both cities. Preliminary cost estimates for this project are $7 million with 20% of that amount locally funded. This means that the two cities would each fund $700.000. The other road improvement project is to construct a grade separated railroad crossing along 43rd Street near the existing Renton/Tukwila boundary. The situation is similar to the 27th Street extension. If Tukwila is allowed to annex the subject section of 43rd Street, Renton will lose control of.9 road improvement project that is high priority. Staff is therefore recommending a similar resolution of the issue, which is to assign top priority to this project in the TIP's in both cities and agree to share the cost of the improvements equally. The 20% local share of this $3 million improvement would be about $300.000 each. " " Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 4 The fourth issue which was identified involves the proposed P-I drainage canal. Currently, a section of the necessary P-I right-of-way is in the City of Tukwila. If the boundary line is adjusted, the entire P-I corridor will be within Renton. For this reason, staff recommends that Renton agree to assume the full cost of acquiring and constructing the complete canal. This is reasonable since the benefitting property owners are almost exclusively within Renton. Likewise, Tukwila would assume the complete cost of the Green River dike maintenance. At present, approximately 22% of the Green River frontage is in Renton and consequently 22% of the cost is absorbed by Renton. However, Renton would still be part of the Green River Management Agreement because the City receives some flood control benefit from that agreement. To ensure that these Issues. are resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both jurisdicf.ions, the attached resolution (attachment 114) describes the commitments each city is making to the other. LMS:0215s:wr Attachments -+- Renton-Tu' ~lal- 'a Boundary Adjustment ... Affected Areas Lands to Renton LONGACRES lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton lands to Tukwila o 1/1.1/8(. " :ON/TUKWlLA BORDER EXCHANGE ATTACHMENT #1 -Assessed Valuation and Acreage Analysis - TO TUKWILA TO RENTON MAP NO. PARCEL VALUE AC PARCEL VALUE AC 3.62 13 27 (portion) $ 157,700 12.79 TOTALS 1 parcel $ 157,700 3.62 o parcels 18 63 $ 255,000 2.35 32 200 0.27 . 28 167,600 3.85 7 MDC 198,300 4.55 TOTALS 4 parcels $ 621,100 11.02 o parcels 21 38 MOe $1,052,500 1.84 41 $ 216,400 19.05 0.91 8 MDC (p) 39,600 2.91 4 510,500 23.44 1.14 9 MOC (p) 49,600 3.05 43 115,700 2.15 50 54,700 0.84 51 33,000 0.72 23 73,700 2.16 6 222,000 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 34,500 44.10 21 MDC 81,500 2.45 2.16 22 (portion 141,600 10.47 TOTALS 11 parcels $1,898,400 23.23 2 parcels $ 726,900 42.49 25 21 $ 544,500 1.61 42 $ 216,400 16.03 59 40,400 0.37 20 1,075,000 2.14 33 1,479,400 3.69 17 645,700 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 102,700 10.43 5.44 24 (portion) 87,000 44.10 22 197,300 3.01 TOTALS 8 parcels $4,172,000 25.20 1 parcel $ 216,400 16.03 MAP NO. PARCEL 26 TOTALS o parcels 29 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 TOTALS 21 parcels TOTALS TO TUKWILA TO RENTON TO TUKWILA VALUE $ 326,700 2,223,700 2,235,100 18,500 1,496,600 10,800 25,100 21,300 350,700 21,300 17,500 35,600 49,100 20,800 32,500 22,800 18,200 18,200 167,200 254,900 162,300 $7,528,900 45 parcels 11 parcels -2 - AC PARCEL 19 1 parcel 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84. 5.54 3.09 38.58 o parcels 0160(Portion) 0145 0155(Portion) 0150 ono 0330 Lot #2 7 parcels . $14,378,100 $ 2,879,745 TO RENTON VALUE $1,751,500 $1,751,500 $ $ 59,508 9,500 42,902 71,800 676 37 522 184,945 101.65 acres 114.01 acres AC 40.21 40.21 . 11.79 .29 1.29 1.49 .28 .02 .12 15.28 1531G RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY REVISION Landowner! Address Jacob Neilsen 1602 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98055 F. L. Branson. Prop. Dev. Spec. Burlington Northern RR 2100 First Interstate center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. WA 98104-1105 Union Pacific Corp. P. O. Bo)( 2500 Broomfield. CO B0020 Manufacturers Mineral Co. 1215 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98005 Puget Sound Power and Light Puget Power Building Bellevue. WA 98004 Jerry and Marlene Ivy 4315 7th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98108 Alaskan Copper Co •• Inc. 17300 West Valley Highway Renton. WA 98005 Relco Investment Co. P. O. Bo)( 88700 Tukwila Br. Seattle. WA 98188 Oregon-Washington RR clo Union Pacific RR P. O. Bo)( 2500 Broomfield. CO 80020 West Valley Assoc. 1313 East Prospect Seattle. WA 98112 David Goodwin P. O. Bo)( 497 Wrangell. AK 99929 INVOLVED LANDOWNERS Parcel(s) 242304-27.63 242304-28 252304-4. 6. 42. 43. 22 362304-36 MDC -7 MPC -21 142304-0160 (par). Lot 112. 0145 242304-32 242304-106 252304-50. 51. 23 362304-35 MDC -8 252304-17 252304-20 252304-21. 59 252304-24 362304-34 MDC -9 252304-33 362304-7.8 Landownerl Address Randall Weitzel 1908 S.W. 43rd Street Renton. WA 96055 Nancy GladsJo 21416 S.E. 265th Kent. WA 96031 Leigh Rabel Star Machinery Co. 4202 West Valley Road Renton. WA 98055 Gerard M. Shellan II Lummi Key Bellevue. WA 96006 Chi-Tai Chu 4431 N.E. 23rd Ct. Renton. WA 96055 Ernest Patty 2120 S.W. 43rd Renton. WA 96055 Wm. E. Roberts 606 S.W. Broadway Portland. OR 97206 Allen and Joan Cullen 3613 61st S.W. Seattle. WA 96116 CG3 905 S.W. 16th Portland. OR 97205 A. Nagy 2963 4th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98134 - 2 - Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. 1416 Dodge Street Omaha. NB 66179 Black River Quarry 6608 South 140th Seattle. WA 98178 Parcells) 362304-9 36n04-10. 14. 29 362304-11.61 362304-13 362304-37. 43 362304-36. 39. 53 362304-57.97 362304-59 362304-62 MDe -38 142304-0155 (por). 0330 142304-0150.0320 (por) IHTACHMENT #2 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES Procedures for an adjustment of corporate boundaries between Renton and Tukwila which involves the annexation and disincorporation of certain lands. Step Une Tukwila passes a resolution calling for the City of Renton to annex the subject areas. In a separate resolution the City of Tukwila adopts a reso- lution indicating a willingness to annex other areas to be given up by the City of Renton. A mi rror of thi s process sha 11 be completed by the CitY.pf Renton City Council for those areas to be ceded from Renton to the City of Tukwila, and accepted by the City of Renton from Tukwila. SEPA must be completed prior to passage of the resolutions. Each resolution should contain: a description of the annexation areas, any changes in private property indebtedness, a call for the County Auditor to hold an election(s) as applicable (see Steps Three and Four) and set elec- tion dates as applicable (ibid.). The resolution must be sent to all affected legislative bodies pursuant to RCW 35.10.220. Step Two Petitions for Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval pursuant to RCW 35.93 must be submitted by each city. BRB approval is required and ,should be secured, prior to proceeding to Step Three. This step woula involve completing a BRB ~otice of lntention (To Annex) and responding to requests for additional information at a public hearing. Step Three An election must be held for all qualified electors in the area to be ceded by the appropriate City. The annexation question shall only be sub- mitted to the electors residing in the territory proposed for transfer; a vote by the entire electorate of either city is not required 'to decide the annexation issue. If there are no qualified electors in the areas being ceded, then the City Councils shall decide on whether to approve the transfer by a majority vote. (RCW 35.10.217). The election shall be administered by the County Auditor who shall act upon the request of a legislative body pursuant to RCW 35.10.220 and .240. A majority vote by these electors approving the proposed transfer is required. A certified copy of the results of each election shall be sent to each legislative body. Election notice shall be given pursuant to RCW 20.29.0BO. This notice shall consist of at least one legal notice published in at least one publi- cation of general circulation within the county not more than 10 nor less than 3 days prior to the election by the County Auditcr. Notice shall include any questions on assumption of indebtedness to be decided. (RCW 35. 10.230) • '. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Procedures October 8, 1985 Page 2 Step Four If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually aSSigned to properties, not admi-.~ nistrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor.' s Office). In the event that a city assumes the indebtedness of another city, an elec- tion shall be held for the entire electorate of the city assuming the indebtedness. A proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside the constitutional and/or statutory limits of the other corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if at least 3/5 of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not origi- nate votes in favor thereof, and the number of persons voting on such pro- position constitutes not less than'40% of the total number of votes cast in such corporations in which indebtedness did not originate at the last pre- ceding general election: provided, however, that if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the City legislative body, a proposition for the assumption of such indebtedness by the other cor- poration ·in which such indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. (RCW 35.10.240). !itep Five An ordinance annexing the subject areas must be enacted. A public hearing must be held prior to enacting the ordinance. The public hearing may be held at any time before or after passage of the annexation resolution in Step One. (RENT. TUKl) (4C.2 ) 1464G ATTACHMENT #3 COMPARATIVE ASSESSED VAlUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue - I. KOLL BUSINESS PARK (City of Renton) Property Area (Square Footage) Assessed Valuation Lot {11 65,205 sq. ft. (Developed) $ 516,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot {/2 60,851 sq. ft. (Developed) $ 182,500 (Land Only) Lot {13 48,169 sq. ft. (Developed) $1,206,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot {/4. 59,417 sq. ft. (Under Construction) $ 163,300 (Land Only) Lot {15 258,888 sq. ft. (Developed) $3,085,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot {16 139,818 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $1,593,900 (Land & Improvements) Lot II? 200,075 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) $ 500,100 (Land Only) Lot {18 192,628 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) $ 481,500 (Land Only) TOTAL 1,075,051 sq. ft. $7,728,300 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $7.19 II. ACQUISITIONS FROM PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE Property Area (Acres) Tax Lot {/4 Tax Lot (119 Tax Lot {/41 Tax Lot {/42 23.44 40.21 19.05 16.03 Assessed Valuation $ 510,500 (Land Only) $1,751,500 (Land Only, Developed, however) $ 414,900 (Land Only) $ 216,400 (Land Only) TOTAL 98.73 acres/4,300,679 sq. ft. $2,893,300 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $0.67 PROJECTED TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION (a) $ 2,00/sq. ft. = $ 8,601,358 (b) $ 4.00/sq. ft. = $17,202,716 Cc) $ 6.00/sq. ft. = $25,804,074 Cd) $ 8.00/sq. ft. = $34,405,432 Ce) $10.00/sq. ft. = $43,006,790 lSlSG CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 'WASHINGTON. AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ATTACHMENT #4 WHEREAS. the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila Is Irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the current boundary Is difficult for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current Irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas. Including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail. NOW THEREFORE " ' ". RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. SECTION III: The City of Renton intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR 18 I) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Renton. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwlla that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution· of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. 1. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both Jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry. the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire District It!) should be determined. In addition. the processing plant/crusher on the west side of Monster Road S.W. should transfer from Tukwila to Renton. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local share of project costs should be divided equally between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South IBOth Street to the state highway system. · , RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green Ri ver (which is currently 22 percent) shouid be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Vailey Road (SR-IBl) shouid be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utIllty users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. .... , .~ RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 8. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. 9. The City of Tukwila and the City of Renton should mutually agree to a policy providing that future annexations by either city should continue to respect the easterly railroad right-of -way south of the Green River crossing of 1-5. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ day of February, 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MA VOR this __ day of February, 1986. Barbara V, Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney '.,. .~ OF THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 z '6 ~ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 'l?o co' 0-2 ~t:?- "I7'EO SEPi<'Il''O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM March 5. 1 986 TO: i?E Vl S ION1I3 '{Q"'~ MaYOrShinpoch' CA~\ -D~~\3~l2b~~~ City Council Members FROM: Larry M. Springer Policy Development Director SUBJECT: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Status Report and Issue Paper " :~ .', For the past several months. the Planning Department staff from both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila have been investigating the possibility of, straightening the common boundary between the two jurisdictions. At present. the city limits are highly irregular ,as is shown on the attached map. The proposal .. .a8 Elesczibed iii detail-4n A~p1ent ~ is to adopt the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. The adjusted corporate limits will substantially improve or resolve the several problems which result from the existing irregular border Une. Problem Statement Straightening the boundary line between Renton and Tukwila is an idea which has been discussed for more than a decade. Interest in this process stems from several difficult problems. First of all. the existing irregular line makes It very difficult for the citizens and property owners to identify with the city of which they are legally a part. Businesses on the west side of the Green River naturally identify with Tukwila because of that city's proximity. yet many of them are actually in the City of Renton. Andy's Tukwila Station restaurant is the best example of this concern. The reverse situation will exist when the Burlington Northern property develops in the midst of Renton's Valley Industrial Area but with a Tukwila address. A second and related problem concerns land use and the development approval process. Renton has taken several significant steps to control the quality of the development which is being proposed for the Valley Industrial Area. Unfortunately. one of the major property holdings in the Valley is currently in the City of Tukwila and is subject to that City's zoning code and land use approval process. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan for the area Is ( / y Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5. 1986 Page 2 based on a rather different concept. which is not necessarily compatible with the concept adopted by the Renton City Council for the VaHey. Likewise. Tukwila Is very concerned about the type and style of development which is occurring along West VaHey Highway. This is a high visibility corridor for Tukwila. and development which is not compatible with their Land Use Plan could result in significant adverse impacts for that community. Third. several of the large private property owners have to contend with the codes and land use approval process in both cities because the irregular city limits cut across their holdings. In most cases. this situation would yield a fragmented and poorly designed project. The fourth issue concerns the ability of the two jurisdictions to provide necessary utllities and public services. The railroad tracks. for example. represent a substantial barrier for the extension of sewer and water lines. This may be one of the major reasons that the Burlington Northern property in the VaHey Industrial Area has not yet been developed. Renton utilities are in the street adjacent to the property: but. because the property is in Tukwila. the services are not available. Furthermore. the response time for emergency service vehicles is severely reduced because there are only two railroad crossing points. one at 43rd Street and the other at 16th Street. Given the location of railroad crossings and the irregular boundary. the emergency response time from Renton to locations such as Andy's Tukwila Station is unacceptable. The boundary line adjustment would resolve this problem and significantly improve the availability and cost of providing emergency services for citizens in both jurisdictions. The Process The annexation and de-annexation process that wiH be required to adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary is described in detail in the Revised Code of Washington CRCW 35.10). Basically. there are four steps in the process. The first is to have both City Councils adopt separate resolutions which mirror one another. Renton's resolution would indicate a willingness to annex specific property in Tukwila and request that Tukwila be willing to annex specific properties in Ren The second step is for both cities to request Boundary Review Board approval. . n e 'Fhei firlai=clep is=:to cQnt;il:lsb-an-aonexatloo ord io9Rc8 pt;lslie Ae8fif\~ SAd at_&" tsrer-ctate .... -enaet-the-ordinance-if-thaUs_the_desire-of-the-respecUve-Git,y..cauoclls. =1"1.999 Pi ocaddl es are-spelled alIt in detail il' AttacliillGJlb ~~ The Planning Directors from both cities have met on several occasions to discuss potential problems associated with this proposal. In addition. there were meetings between staff from the respective Mayor'S Offices. the Police and Fire Chiefs. the Public Works Directors. and a citizens' meeting to which residents and property owners in the affected area were invited to attend. Based on those discussions. the following issues have been identified as important to Renton including recommendations for appropriate commitments to resolve. If the adjustment is approved. the .""J? with an assessed Illj.o I ,.....~.,,-'g)'f( 7'tS , . .. t ...... ::'-'~" ::,011 u .... ,.. '..,. -""1 1 rtt.:. , Memo to Mayor and Council Members March S. 1986 ~ ; <?l ;; Page l -= ""-_, -3~J;S"~,IS- it<, 'ill tu. 3.09/7{' the equivalent of $HI,JB2.68 in property taxes at the 1986 levy rate of 1::I.Zl~S-}4 per $1.000. However. one could argue that the lost valuation is temporary. The majority of the property Renton would acquire in this process is undeveloped Burlington Northern land, These holdings are currently being assessed at approximately $1.00 per square foot but they have great development potential. When these parcels are developed as manufacturing and office park uses. similar to the land uses on adjacent properties. then the City should expect a significant increase in the assessed valuation and resulting property tax revenue. Neighboring fully developed properties are assessed at approximately $7.00 per square foot. If even a portion of the Burlington Northern property is developed. the City will more than offset the assessed valuation lost by the boundary line adjustme~t (0 ettaehfl:eRt t.'l). " The second issue that surfaced concerns an area Renton would be relinquishing to Tukwila just north of 4lrd Street between the Green River and the BN railroad tracks. Renton installed the sewer and water utilities. which have allowed this area to develop as warehousing and low intensity office uses. The Renton Public Works Director would like to retain ownership of those utilities and continue to operate and maintain them for the benefit of existing property owners and businesses. Rather than undermine the intent of the boundary line adjustment. staff from both cities recommend that Tukwila proceed to annex the subject area and that Renton continue to own the utilities and provide service through an interlocal services agreement with the City of Tukwila. The assumption is that the utility surcharge normally imposed on out-of-city subscribers would not be imposed in this unique instance. A3 The third issue involves two road improvements that are perceived to'be critical by the CSJ City of Renton. One project is the extension of 27th Street west to the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. At present. the entire corridor for the 27th Street extension is withIn Renton. and we are responsible for the total cost of construction and the land use approval process which will likely trigger the project. If this corridor is annexed by Tukwila. Renton loses control of this vitally necessary street linkage with potentially serious consequences for the circulation system in the Valley Industrial Area. To avoid this problem. the staffs from both cities recommend that the 27th Street extension project be aSSigned top priority in the Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) of both jurisdictions. This project currently has top priority in Renton but has only moderate priority in Tukwila. In addition. staff recommends that the cost of right-of-way acquisition and road construction be shared by the two jurisdictions on an equal basis. since the completed street linkage will improve traffic circulation for both cities. Preliminary cost estimates for this project are $7 million with 20% of that amount locally funded. This means that the two cities would each fund $700.000. The other road improvement project is to construct a grade separated railroad crossing along 4lrd Street near the existing Renton/Tukwila boundary. The situation is similar to the 27th Street extension. If Tukwila is allowed to annex the subject section of 4lrd Street. Renton will lose control of a road improvement project that is high priority. Staff is therefore recommending a similar resolution of the issue. which is to assign top priority to this project in the TIP's in both cities and agree to share the cost of the improvements equally. The 20% local share of this $3 million improvement would be about $300.000 each. Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5. 1986 Page 4 @) The fourth issue which was identified involves the proposed P-I drainage canal. Currently. a section of the necessary P-I right-of-way is in the City of Tukwila. If the ~ boundary line is adjusted. the entire P-I corridor will be within Renton. For this reason. staff recommends that Renton agree to assume the full cost of acquiring and constructing the complete canal. This is reasonable since the benefitting property owners are almost exclusively within Renton. Likewise. Tukwila would assume the complete cost of the Green River dike maintenance. At present. approximately 22% of the Green River frontage is in Renton and consequently 22% of the cost is absorbed by Renton. However. Renton would still be part of the Green River Management Agreement because the City receives some flood control benefit from that agreement. ." To ensure that these issues are resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both jurisdictions. the attached resolution {attachll,eFlt lIlt} describes the commitments each city is making to the other. LMS:0275s:wr ,AHe. hrrtelilAr • -1 -- Renton-Tukwil~ doundary Adjustment ~lap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton LONGACRES Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila o 2000· ... , . / ,.of" RENTON/TUKWILA BORDER EXCHANGE ATTACHMENT #1 -Assessed Valuation and Acreage Analysis - TO TUKWILA TO RENTON MAP NO. PARCEL VALUE AC PARCEL VALUE AC 3.62 13 27 (portion) $ 157,700 12.79 TOTALS 1 parcel $ 157,700 3.62 o parcels 18 63 $ 255,000 2.35 32 200 0.27 28 167,600 3.85 7 MOe 198,300 4.55 TOTALS 4 parcels $ 621,100 11.02 o parcels 21 38 MOe $1,052,500 1.84 41 $ 216,400 19.05 0.91 ~SID,SOO 8 MOe (p) 39,600 2.91 4 ~500 23.44 1.14 9 MOC (p) 49,600 3.05 43 115,700 2.15 50 54,700 0.84 51 33,000 0.72 23 73,700 2.16 6 222,000 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 34,500 44.10 21 MOC 81,500 2.45 2.16 22 (portion 141,600 10.47 TOTALS 11 parcels $1,898,400 23.23 2 parcels $ 726,900 42.49 25 21 $ 544,500 1.61 42 $ 216,400 16.03 59 40,400 0.37 20 1,075,000 2.14 33 1,479,400 3.69 17 645,700 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 102,700 10.43 5.44 24 (portion) 87,000 44.10 22 197,300 3.01 TOTALS 8 parcels $4,172,000 25.20 1 parcel $ 216,400 16.03 Ml'P NO. PARCEL 26 TOTALS o parcels 29 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 TOTALS 21 parcels TOTALS TO TUKWILA TO RENTON TO TUKWILA VAWE $ 326,700 2,223,700 2,235,100 18,500 1,496,600 10,800 25,100 21,300 350,700 21,300 17,500 '5,600 49,100 20,800 32,500 22,800 18,200 16,200 167,200 254,900 162,300 $7,528,900 45 parcels 11 parcels -2 - AC PARCEL 19 1 parcel 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 o.n 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.64 5.54 3.09 38.56 o parcels 0160(Porlion) 0145 OU5(Porlion) 0150 0320 0330 Lot #2 7 parcels $14,378,100 $ 2,879,745 TO RENTON VAWE $1,751,500 $1,751,500 $ $ 59,508 9,500 42,902 71,800 676 37 522 184,945 101.65 acres 114.01 acres AC 40.21 40.21 11.79 .29 1.29 1.49 .28 .02 .12 15.28 ·, 15~IG RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNOARY REVISION INVOLVED LANODWNERS Landowner! Address Jacob Neilsen 1602 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98055 F. L. Branson. Prop. Oev. Spec. Burlington Northern RR 2100 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. WA 98104-1105 Union Pacific Corp. P. O. Box 2500 B~oomfield. CO 80020 Manufacturers Mineral Co. 1215 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98005 Puget Sound Power and Light Puget Power Building Bellevue. WA 98004 Jerry and Marlene Ivy 4315 7th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98108 Alaskan Copper Co •• Inc. 17300 West Valley Highway Renton. WA 98005 Relco Investment Co. P. O. Box 88700 Tukwila Br. Seattle. WA 98188 Oregon-Washington RR clo Union Pacific RR P. O. Box 2500 Broomfield. CO 80020 West Valley Assoc. 1313 East Prospect Seattle. WA 98112 David Goodwin P. O. Box 497 Wrangell. AK 99929 Parcel(s) 242}04-27. 6~ 242}04-28 25n04-4. 6. 42. 4}. 22 ~62}04-~6 MDC -7 MPC -21 l42}04-0160 (por). Lot 112. 0145 242}04-~2 242}04-106 252~04-50. 51. 2} 362304-35 MDC -8 252}04-17 252304-20 252304-21. 59 252304-24 362304-34 MDC -9 . 252304-}3 362304-7.8 " Landowner/Address Randall Weitzel 1908 S.W. 4:5rd Street Renton. WA 98055 Nancy Gladsjo 21416 S.E. 265th Kent. WA 980:51 Leigh Rabel Star Machinery Co. 4202 West Valley Road Renton. WA 98055 Gerard M. Shellan 11 Lummi Key Bellevue. WA 98006 Chi-Tal Chu 44:51 N.E. 2:5rd Ct. Renton. WA 98055 Ernest Patty 2120 S.W. 4:5rd Renton. WA 98055 Wm. E. Roberts 806 S.W. Broadway Portland. OR 97206 Allen and Joan Cullen :561:5 61st S.W. Seattle. WA 98116 CG:5 905 S.W. 16th Portland. OR 97205 A. Nagy 296:5 4th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98 1:54 -2- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. 1416 Dodge Street Omaha. NB 68119 Black River Quarry 6808 South 140th Seattie. WA 98118 Parcells) :562:504-9 :562:504-10. 14. 29 :562:504-11.61 :562:504-n :562304-:57.43 :562:504-:58. 39. 5:5 :562:504-57.97 :562:504-59 :562:504-62 MOC -38 142:504-0155 (par). 0:5:50 142:504-0150. 0:520 (par) ATTACHMENT #2 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES Procedures for an adjustment of corporate boundaries between Renton and Tukwila which involves the annexation and disincorporation of certain lands. Step Une Tukwila passes a resolution calling for the City of Renton to annex the subject areas. In a separate resolution the City of Tukwila adopts a reso- lution indicating a willingness to annex other areas to be given up by the City of Renton. A mirror of this process shall be completed by the City ~f Renton City Council for those areas to be ceded from Renton to the City cif Tukwila, and accepted by the City of Renton from Tukwila. SEPA must be completed prior to passage of the resolutions. Each resolution should contain: a description of the annexation areas, any changes in private property indebtedness, a call for the County Auditor to hold an e1ection(s) as applicable (see Steps Three and Four) and set elec- tion dates as applicable (ibid.). The resolution must be sent to all affected legislative bodies pursuant to RCW 35.10.220. Step Two Petitions for Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval pursuant to RCW 35.93 must be submitted by each city. BRB approval is required and -should be secured-prior to proceeding to Step Three. This step woula involve completing a BRB ~otice of Intention (To Annex) and responding to requests for additional information at a public hearing. Step Three An election must be held for all qualified electors in the area to be ceded by the appropriate City. The annexation question shall only be sub- mitted to the electors residing in the territory proposed for transfer; a vote by the entire electorate of either city is not required-to decide the annexation issue. If there are no qualified electors in the areas being ceded, then the City Councils shall decide on whether to approve the transfer by a majority vote. (RCW 35.10.217). The election shall be administered by the County Auditor who shall act upon the request of a legislative body pursuant to RCW 35.10.220 and .240. A majority vote by these electors approving the proposed transfer is required. A certified copy of the results of each election shall be sent to each legislative body. Election notice shall be given pursuant to RCW 20.29.0BO. This notice shall consist of at least one legal notice published in at least one publi- cation of general circulation within the county not more than 10 nor less than 3 days prior to the election by the County Auditor. Notice shall include any questions on assumption of indebtedness to be decided. (RCW 35.1U.230). Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation Procedures October 8, 1985 Page 2 Step Four If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to properties, not admi-. nistrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor-'s Office). In the event that a city assumes the indebtedness of another city, an elec- tion shall be held for the entire electorate of the city assuming the . indebtedness. A proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside the constitutional and/or statutory limits of the other corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if at least 3/5 of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not origi- nate votes in favor thereof, and the number of persons voting on such pro- position constitutes not less than40~ of the total number of votes cast in such corporations in which indebtedness did not originate at the last pre- ceding general election: provided, however, that if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the City legislative body, a proposition for the assumption of such indebtedness by the other cor- porationin which such indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. (RCW 35.10.240). ~tep Five An ordinance annexing the subject areas must be enacted. A public hearing must be held prior to enacting the ordinance. The public hearing may be held at any time before or after passage of the annexation resolution in Step One. (RENT. TiJKl) (4C.2) 1464G ATTACHMENT #3 COMPARATIVE ASSESSED VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue - I. KOLL BUSINESS PARK (City of Renton) Pr02ert~ Area (Sguare Footage} Assessed Valuation " Lot III 65,205 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $ 516,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot 112 60,851 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $ 182,500 (Land Only) Lot {fj 48,169 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $1,206,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot 114 59,417 sq. ft. (Under Construction) $ 16},}00 (Land Only) Lot {IS 258,888 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $},085,OOO (Land & Improvements) Lot 116 D9,8l8 sq. ft. (Oeveloped) $1,59},900 (Land & Improvements) Lot 117 200,075 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) $ 500,100 (Land Only) Lot {l8, 192,628 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) ~ 481,500 (Land Only) 'rOTAL 1,075,051 sq. ft. $7,728,}00 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $7.19 II. ACQUISITIONS FROM PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE Property Area (Acres} Assessed Valuation Tax Lot 114 Tax Lot 1119 Tax Lot {/41 Tax Lot {/42 TOTAL 2}.44 $ 510,500 (Land Only) 40.21 $l,7~~~~QQ (Land Only, Oeveloped, 19.05 $ ~ (Land Only) 16.0} $ 216,400 (Land Only) Q1j.i3 :/ifC) {;"fi.f, ~DO 98.i; acres/\;lQQj8~' sq. ft. $~.8~"gOO 11'\ et ~\1'(/3n" ,. . {); ~'ut~ t.J 300 (",., Assessed Valuatlon}sq. ft. = $0 .~. ~ 'I I ~ "T' for • .!J • b3 j4- PROJECTED TOTAL ASSESSEO VALUATION '8, ('01,3 58 t7,()Od,l/(,. <3-5, ~DLf, D''1 3'1,'ioS/f3d-" ~31 Oo{,,} fqO however) l5l5G CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO, __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA, 'WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF 'TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORA TE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ATTACHMENT #4 .- WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila Is irregular and does not follow an easily Identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary Is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current Irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, reallgning and Simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical malllng addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFORE RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. 00 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true end correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to reallgn and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. of Renton areas currently 1I-L." ...... _...- located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if j fully set forth. tJ {"·b (Property located genera!Jy between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. ,~O ~t.~ ~ 'ilnd the Surllngton Northern railroad tracks and south of ~~~ongacres racetrack.) . . upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: e City of Renton formally requests that the City 0 Tukwlla annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: J See Exhibit "S" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if "'\ t" fully set forth. \,u . i...,4(!.C'\ \~(Property located generally between the West Valley Highway \1'-\, '\ 0; (SR 181) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and '\~~~ between S.W. 43rd Street end 1-405.) . upon the de-annexation of the ebove ,*operties from the ity of Renton. ~. e,. ..(OT~'~II.sf .. s~-J .. i-,~~ ~_e. {.,~ 1-. t"t-vt.. Cf.., ot'~\o-ot-L II ~s-e ~ c!.ser,. ;",SfF'C.fi~.s. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must 'be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these Issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. , I. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Biack River Quarry, the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currentiy provided by Fire District Ill) should be determined. In addition, the processing plant/crusher on the west side of Monster Road S.W. should transfer from Tukwila to Renton. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local share of project costs shouid be divided equally between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should aiso pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South IBDth Street to the state highway system. .' RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4' '. 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which Is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South l80th Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 7. An Interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when ~ .t~c~. s:v~ !.=d~:i~~ f~~;~t~~ers located In the alii bE to ufd R' 1 a lIIeif' bs . ; 'ert aftero ail; lio " ... . ~ RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ B. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for Improvements to SR-1B1 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. the .Green River crossing of 1-5. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ day of February. 1986. Maxine E. Motor. City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this __ day of February. 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney OF z '6 E ~.() ",. 0-2 ((,<?- "'I7"£:0 SEP"\~~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 5, 19B6 TO: Mayor Shinpoch THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM REVISION NO.3 • City Council Members FROM: Larry M. Springer Policy Development Director SUBJECT: Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Status Report and Issue Paper For the past several months, the Planning Department staff from both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila have been investigating the possibility of straightening the common boundary between the two jurisdictions. At present, the city limits are highly irregular as is shown on the attached map; The proposal is to adopt the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the new boundary line between the two cities. The adjusted corporate limits will substantially improve or resolve the several problems which result from the existing irregular border line. Problem Statement Straightening the boundary line between Renton and Tukwila is an idea which has been discussed for more than a decade. Interest in this process stems from several difficult problems. First of all, the existing irregular line makes it very difficult for the citizens and property owners to identify with the city of which they are legally a part. Businesses on the west side of the Green River naturally identify with Tukwila because of that city's proximity, yet many of them are actually in the City of Renton. Andy's Tukwila Station restaurant is the best example of this concern. The reverse situation will exist when the Burlington Northern property develops in the midst of Renton's Valley Industrial Area but with a Tukwila address. A second and related problem concerns land use and the development approval process. Renton has taken several significant steps to control the quality of the development which is being proposed for the Valley Industrial Area. Unfortunately, one of the major property holdings in the Valley is currently in the City of Tukwila and is subject to that City's zoning code and land use approval process. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan for the area is Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 2 REVISION No.3 based on a rather different concept, which is not necessarily compatible with the concept adopted by the Renton City Council for the Valley. Likewise, Tukwila is very concerned about the type and style of development which is occurring along Wost Valley Highway. This is a high visibility corridor for Tukwila, and development which is not compatible with their Land Use Plan could result in significant adverse impacts for that community. Third, several of the large private property owners have to contend with the codes and land use approval process in both cities because the irregular city limits cut across their holdings. In most cases, this situation would yield a fragmented and poorly designed project. The fourth issue concerns the ability of the two jurisdictions to provide necessary utilities and public services. The railroad tracks, for example, represent a substantial barrier for the extension of sewer and water lines. This may be one of the major reasons that the Burlington Northern property in the Valley Industrial Area has not yet been developed. Renton utilities are in the street adjacent to the property: but, because the property is in Tukwila, the services are not available. Furthermore, the response time for emergency service vehicles is severely reduced because there are only two railroad crossing points, one at 43rd Street and the other at 16th Street. Given the location of railroad crossings and the irregular boundary, the emergency response time from Renton to locations such as Andy's Tukwila Station is unacceptable. The boundary line adjustment would resolve this problem and significantly improve the availability and cost of providing emergency services for citizens in both Jurisdictions. The Process The annexation and de-annexation process that will be required to adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary is described in detail in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 35.10). Basically, there are four steps in the process. The first is to have both City Councils adopt separate resolutions which mirror one another. Renton's resolution would indicate a willingness to annex specific property in Tukwila and request that Tukwila be willing to annex specific properties in Renton. The second step i>l for both cities to request Boundary Review Board approval. Third, a public hearing on the proposed annexation must be held by the annexing City Council. Thus, both Renton and Tukwila must hold a public hearing on the proposed actions for the property owners in their respective annexation areas. (There are less than ten households involved in the RentonlTukwila boundary adjustment area.) Fourth, adoption of an annexing resolution will start a thirty (30) day protest period. If owners of less than sixty (60) percent of the total property value in the annexation area protest the annexation in writing to the annexing City Council within this thirty (30) day period, then the annexation shall automatically become effective at the end of the thirty day period [RCW 35.10.217(2)]. The Planning Directors from both cities have met on several occasions to discuss potential problems associated with this proposal. In addition, there were meotings between staff from the respective Mayor's Offices, the Police and Fire Chief!!, the Public Works Directors, and a citizens' meeting to which residents and property owners in the affected area were invited to attend. Based on those discussions, the following issues have been identified as important to Renton including recommendations for appropriate commitments to resolve. Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 3 REVISION No.3 If the adjustment is approved, the City of Renton will relinquish !O 1.65 acres in 45 parcels with an assessed valuation of $14,378,100~ In return, the City will anne)( 114.01 acres in .. 11 parcels with an assessed valuation of ~i~'7i~~' Concern has been e~g that the City of !,enton will ~ ~bl~n~ a net I ~~ i ssessed valuation of $11, , which is the eqUIvalent of $ • .,. In property ta)(es at the 1986 levy rate of 3.09176 per $1,000. However, one could argue that the lost valuation is temporary. The majority of the property Renton would acquire In this process is undeveloped Burlington Northern land. These holdings are currently bein~ assessed at appro)(imately $1.00 per square foot but they have great development potential. When these parcels are developed as manufacturing and office park uses, similar to the. land uses on adjacent propertie9, then the City should e)(pect a significant increase in the assessed valuation and resulting property ta)( revenue. Neighboring fully developed properties are assessed at appro)(imately $7.00 per square foot. If even a portion of the Burlington Northern property is developed, the City will more than offset the assessed valuation lost by the boundary line adjustment. The second issue that surfaced concerns an area Renton would be relinquishing to Tukwila just north of 43rd Street between the Green River and the BN railroad tracks. Renton Installed the sewer and water utilities, which have allowed this area to' develop as warehousing and low intensity office uses. The Renton Public Works Director would like to retain ownership of those utilities and continue to operate and maintain them for the benefit of e)(isting property owners and businesses. Rather than undermine the intent of the boundary line adjustment, staff from both cities recommend that Tukwila proceed to anne)( the subject area and that Renton continue to own the utilities and provide service through an inter local services agreement with the City of Tukwila. The assumption Is that the utility surcharge normally imposed on out-of-city subscribers would not be imposed in this unique instance. The third issue involves two road improvements that are perceived to be critical by the City of Renton. Dne project Is the e)(tension of 27th Street west to the intersection of StrandeI' Boulevard and West Valley Highway. At present, the entire corridor for the 27th Street e)(tension is within Renton, and we are responsible for the total' cost of construction and the land use approval process which will likely trigger the project. If this corridor is anne)(ed by Tukwila, Renton loses control of this vitally necessary street linkage with potentially serious consequences for the circulation system in the Valley Industrial Area. To avoid this problem, the staffs from both cities recommend that the 27th Street e)(tension project be assigned top priority in the Transportation ' Improvement Programs (TIP) of both jurisdictions. This project currently has top priority in Renton but has only moderate priority In Tukwila. In addition, staff recommends that the cost of right-of-way acquisition and road construction be shared by the two jurisdictions on an equal basis, since the completed street linkage will improve traffic circulation for both cities. Preliminary cost estimates for this project are $7 million with 20% of that amount locally funded. This means that the two cities would each fund $700,000. The other road improvement project is to construct a grade separated railroad crossing along 43rd Street near the e)(isting Renton/Tukwila boundary. The situation is similar to the 27th Street e)(tension. If Tukwila is allowed to anne)( the subject section of 43rd Street, Renton will lose control of a road improvement project that is high priority. Staff Memo to Mayor and Council Members March 5, 1986 Page 4 REVISION NO.3 is therefore recommending a similar resolution of the issue, which is t'J assign top priority to this project in the TIP's in both cities and agree to share the cost of the improvements equally. The 20% local share of this $3 million improvement would be about $300,000 each. The fourth issue which was identified Involves the proposed P·-I drainage canal. Currently, a section of the necessary P-I right-of-way is in the City of Tukwila. If the boundary line is adjusted, the entire P-I corridor will be within Renton. For this reason, staff recommends that Renton agree to assume the full cost of acquiring and constructing the complete canal. This is reasonable since the benefitting propert~' owners are almost e)(clusively within Renton. Likewise, Tukwila would assume the complete cost of the Green River dike maintenance. At present, appro)(imately 22% of the Green River frontage Is in Renton and consequently 22 % of the cost is absorbed by Renton. However, Renton would still be part of the Green River Management Agreement because the City receives some flood control benefit from that agreement. To ensure that these issues are resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both jurisdictions, the attached resolution describes the commitments each city is making to the other. LMS:0275s:wr , ( 3/86 AUSTIN ctlV'ANY ASSESSED VALUATIDNS AND BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue- ........... A. EXISTING -NORTHWEST CORNER LIND AVENUE S.M. AND S.M. 16th STREET Lot '1 Lot 112 Lot 113 Lot 114 TOTAL Property Area (Square Footage) 108,900 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.5 acres) 230,432 sq. ft. (Undevoloped) (5.29 acres) 100,188 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) (2.3 acres) (15 acres) 653,400 sq. ft. (Developed) 1,092,920 sq. ft. (25.09 acres) Assessed Valuation $ 272,200 (Land Only) 576,000 (Land Only) 200,300 (Land Only) (Land & 19,000,000 Improvements) $20,048,500 A.V./sq. ft. = $18.34 Raw Land A.V./sq. ft. = $ 2.39 B. UNDER CONSTRUCTION,'UNDER REVIOI -NO~T CORNER EAST VAlLEY ROAD AND S.M. 161"h STREET (I) Under Construction -140,000 sq. ft. four-story office building on 7.4 acres with building permit valuation to date of $7,802,775. (2) Under Review -140,000 sq. f1". four-story office building on 7 acres. (3) Fu1'ure -Two additional structures similar 1"0 (I) end (2) adjacent on the south. Total Site = 27.94 acres 17200 Lot III = 7.19 acres Lo1" 112 = 7.24 acres Lot '3 = 7.23 ecres Lot 114 = 6.28 acres Raw Land $ 380,575 380,575 380,575 380,575 $1,522,300 A.V./sq. ft. = $1.25 Dev. Land (As of '/86) A.V./sq. ft. = $7.66 , I : , . I -'u I I I I I I .1 : I I I I L-Q~~~;LCC~~:;A~\~I -"'·-0--L r::::::::~::::~~~~~~~~~~ ---I ....... , ' I -:~-:: . .:: ...... :;. • -:.. ---:.. :. -:.:: -=:: -- NO I \ ~I: I ~I ~_lJ 1 I 1 \ __ 1 __ _ I G-I )----~ , , , , , , , ' , ' , ' \; ., , , ; , , , , , , , , , , , ' , , ; Il " H r 7 B .- ----~------, : ,0 .. I'l .-:..1i-- _.11.-. ' ._-"-._...!!.--__ ..ll _ __ .H ... .::.=*.-~ --'-- l ;;;-.--- !- ., OF z ;; '6 I!! ':1>.<) co' o '?-'9",,/~ ~'O~ t:o SEP"<: BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: February 18, I 986 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 . .MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 MEMORANDUM TO: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Members, Renton City Council FROM: SUBJECT: Policy Development Department ANNEXATION PROCEDURES FOR THE RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Attached are detailed annexation procedures required to be followed by the cities of Renton and Tukwila in order to adjust the eastern boundary pursuant to RCW 35.10.217. In general, there are five steps in the annexation procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: I. Council adoption of separate resolutions (a) requesting annexation of certain areas by another city, and (b) indicating a willingness to annex certain areas from another city .. 2. Receive Boundary Review Board approval. 3. Hold an election for those persons residing within the proposed annexation area to decide if they approve of the annexation. Majority approval is mandatory. 4. If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city and it exceeds the constitutional limit established by state statute, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to properties, not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). 5. An annexing ordinance must be enacted. .. , .. .. :, . ANNEXA TION PROCEDURES Procedures for an adjustment of corporate boundaries between Renton and Tukwila which involves the annexation and disincorporation of certain lands. Step One Renton passes a resolution calling for the City of Tukwila to annex the subject areas. In a separate resolution the City of Renton adopts a resolution indicating a willingness to annex other areas to be given up by the City of Tukwila. A mirror of this process shall be completed by the City of Tukwila City Council for those areas to be ceded from Tukwila to the City of Renton, and accepted by the City of Tukwila from Renton. SEPA must be completed prior to passage of the resolutions. Each resolution should contain: a description of the annexation areas, any changes in private property indebtedness, a call for the County Auditors to hold an election(s) as applicable (see Steps Three and Four) and set the election dates as applicable. The resolution must be sent to all affected legislative bodies pursuant to RCW 35.10.220. Step Two Petitions for Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval pursuant to RCW 36.93 must be submitted by each clty. BRB approval is required and should be secured prior to proceeding to Step Three. This step would involve completing a BRB Notice of Intention (To Annex) and responding to requests for additional information at a public hearing. Step Three An election must be held for all qualified electors in the area to be ceded by the appropriate city. The annexation question shall only be submitted to the electors residing in the territory proposed for transfer: a vote by the entire electorate of either city is not required to decide the annexation issue. If there are no qualified electors in the areas being ceded, then the city councils shall decide on whether to approve the transfer by a majority vote. (RCW 35.10.217) The election shall be administered by the County Auditor who shall act upon the request of a legislative body pursuant to RCW 35.10.220 and .240. A majority vote by these electors approving the proposed transfer is required. A certified copy of the results of each election shall be sent to each legislative body. Election notice shall be given pursuant to RCW 20.29.080. This notice shall consist of at least one legal notice published in at least one publication of general clrculation within the county not more than 10 nor less than 3 days prior to the election by the County Auditor. Notice shall include any questions on assumption of indebtedness to be decided. (RCW 35.10.230) -2 - Step Four If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city and it exceeds the constitutional limit established by state statute. then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually assigned to properties. not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). In the event that a city assumes the indebtedness of another city and it' exceeds the constitutional limit established by state statute. an election shall be held for the entire electorate of the city assuming the indebtedness. A proposition for the assumption of indebtedness outside the constitutional and/or statutory limits of the other corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if at least 3/5 of the electors of the corporation in which the indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. and the number of persons voting on such proposition constitutes not less than 40 percent of the total number of votes cast in such corporations in which indebtedness did not originate at the last preceding general election: provided. however, that if general obligation bond indebtedness was incurred by action by the city legislative body. a proposition for the assumption of such indebtedness by the other corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate shall be deemed approved if a majority of the electors of the corporation in which such indebtedness did not originate votes in favor thereof. (RCW 35.10.240) Step Five An ordinance annexing the subject areas must be enacted. A public hearing must be held prior to enacting the ordinance. The public hearing may be held at any time before or after passage of the annexation resolution in Step One. -3 - RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNOARY AOJUSTMENT STUDY INTRODUCTION It has been long recognized by the administrations of Renton and Tukwila that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency serl/lces to those areas of each city cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of -way. With the approval of both city councils. the administrations of each city have been cooperatively exploring the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15. 1985. and again on October 28. 1985. various department directors from both cities met and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the implementation of this proposed boundary adjustment. Both cities also conducted a meeting with affected residents and property owners on January 30. 1986 to explain the effects of the proposal. SA Jatluazy )lB. t'9B6 staff fpQ~ tRe ailies of Ref\tef\ 8F1Ei T\!I\(v:Ua aeREilieteg an iRfsPMatiaAal ~f'iefiA~ ef tAe ReAlien Tu'<'''i' a boundar)' 2aj~.WMe"t at Tl:Jkuuila Sit) I lell. fep 818S 1 esidBnts and prOpSI Ly O'dRQri Prior to the meeting. Renton and Tukwila staff put together a package of information detailing the proposal In order that those affected would be able to come to the meeting prepared for discussion. At the meeting the purpose for proposing the adjustment was explained and some additional background material reviewed. The procedure involved was then detailed and the meeting was opened for questions. Of the five people In attendance. ali were property owners. The chief concern of these people was the effects on their existing land uses should the adjustment be approved. Other questions involved the costs of improvements in the area. The fiscal costs' and benefits to the City of Renton for this proposal are discussed below. FISCAL COSTS AND BENEFITS The Renton/Tukwila boundary adjustment will carry some implicit costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are summarized in the table belOW and then discussed in further detail. - 4 - OF ~e1- ~4, ,? iJ ~Fe ~ THE CITY OF·RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 -... - \ -<o~ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 "-9.. «,~ "Ir-"o SEP1:f."'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: TO: FROM: Feb,-"""",, .ilaAl:lel) 38. 1986 Barbara V. Shlnpoch. Mayor Members. Renton City Council Policy Development Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washilgton 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen. Mayor SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROCEDURES FOR THE RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Attached are detailed annexation procedures required to be followed by the cities of Renton and Tukwlla in order to adjust the eastern boundary pursuant to RCW 35.10.217. In general. there are five steps in the annexation procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: I. Council adoption of separate resolutions (a) requesting annexation of certain areas by another city. and (b) indicating a willingness to annex certain areas from another city. 2. Receive Boundary Review Board approval. 3. Hold an election for those persons residing within the proposed annexation area to decide if they approve of the annexation. Majority approval is mandatory. 4. If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city and it exceeds the constitutional limit established by state statute. then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts and general obligation bonds is usually· assigned to properties. not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). 5. An annexing ordinance must be enacted. OF R~ 4,. <t-~ ~ ..... ~ •. 0 CJ~J .. ~ 'Z % ooIL ~ '6 -~ ~. ~"il «,.~ "r"Eo SEP11:."'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 7. 1986 W. W. Francis. Vice President Burlington Northern Railroad 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. Washington 9B104-1105 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 RE: BOUNDARY AOJUSTMENT BETWEEN RENTON AND TUKWILA Dear Mr. Francis: Over the past several months. the Cities of Renton and Tukwila have been involved in serious negotiations to straighten out the irregular boundary line which currently exists between the two communities. The existing irregular city limits make it difficult and impractical to provide public utilities and emergencies services to private property in the area. much of which Is owned by either Burlington Northern Railroad or Glacier Park Company. Moreover. large property owners. such as B.N .• with holdings on both sides of the boundary line. are required to comply with the regulations and approval processes of two Jurisdictions in order to develop their property. For these and other reasons. the Cities are pursuing a boundary line adjustment. At this point. the proposal is to use the eastern edge of the B.N. Railroad right-of-way as the new Renton-Tukwila city limits as per the attached map. This proposed adjustment will stiil leave substantial acreage owned by B.N. in the City of Tukwila. The acreage in question is located between the B.N. right-of-way and the Union Pacific right-of-way to the west. These parcels are landlocked by the tracks. making access for users and emergency service vehicles difficult and sewer and water service expensive to provide. In addition. Renton would eventually like to extend S.W. 27th Street west to Strander Boulevard and to complete that vital east-west arterial. The separation between the Union Pacific and B.N. tracks makes an above or below grade crossing at 27th Street an extraordinarily expensive project. • - W. W. Francis Vice-president. Burlington Northern Railroad February 7. J 986 Page 2 In considering this problem. we thought about the possibility of relocating the B.N. tracks westward so that they are closer to and parallel with the Union Pacific tracks. This relocation would place all of the B.N. holdings In the City of Renton. Improve traffic access to the property. and facilitate utillty services. It would also make the 27th Street railroad crossing more reasonable. Would Burllngton Northern be at all Interested In such a relocation? I have no Idea how much It would cost to relocate the tracks. but It might be that the Increased usabillty and added value of the currently landlocked property would offset the cost of the relocation. The Idea has merit from our perspective: and. If it Is of any interest to B.N .• we would very much like to sit down and discuss this issue with you or your staff. If you have questions or would like additional information. please call me at 235-2552. LMS:ss 1581G Attachment cc: F. L. Branson, Prop_ Dav. Spec .• B.N. O. A. Bell. Olr .. Engineering. B.N. R. V. Mlulli. Sr. Olr .. Portfollo Oev .• Glacier Park ------_._- () B-1 " f' ------_. -------------_. ---.----- ! .... _.,; : " : .~ : • Ir----, '-~p . ,) r- Ie.; : ,.,. jet ., , : G-I : : H-1 1 11 1 , , 1 M-P 8 1515G CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON. ANO REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTL Y WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON WHEREAS. the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the current boundary is difficult for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas. including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential -----areas-offiscal-and administrative concern in detail. NOW THEREFORE RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. SECTION 1II: The City of Renton intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if . fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . . (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR 181) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Renton. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. !. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equally between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila should agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. 2. In the area of Black River Quarry. the appropriate jurisdiction for fire protection services (currently provided by Fire District Ill) should be determined. 3. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the local share of project costs should be divided equally between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South l80th Street to the state highway system. , . RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 4. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 5. The City of Renton's share of dike maintenance for the Green River (which is currently 22 percent) should be adjusted because the Green River will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. 6. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South I BOth Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBI) should be assumed by the City of Kent •. 7. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 8. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ____ day of January. 1986. Maxine E. Motor. City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this __ day of January. 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch. Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney I) 5/19 2) Prior to 611 3) 7/10 4) 8111 or 8125 5) 9/11 or 9125 1658G RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT -Projected Task Timeline - Resolutions Renton could schedule to be heard by City Council on this date. Tukwila has already adopted the first resolution. Tukwila staff advises that this would be repealed. however. and the latest draft tentatively agreed upon by staff would be adopted some time in May. No specific date was identified by Tukwila. However. it would probably be May 19th. Legal Descriptions. Interlocals. SEPA These items would all have to be completed prior to the first of June. the deadline for submitting material to be considered by the King County Boundary Review Board during the month of July and the beginning of the 60-day review period. King County Boundary Review Board Meeting The Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment is considered on this date. Public Hearings Renton and Tukwila. Tukwila conducts public hearings on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. Should we conduct them on the same night? Property Owner Protest If owners of less than 60% of the assessed valuation within the annexetion area protest the proposal within 30 days of passage by the respective City Councils. then the proposal becomes law. (House Bill 1386 -1986 Washington Legislature). Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation-Deannexation Procedures I. The Renton City Council and the Tukwila City Council adopt resolutions indicating a desire for certain areas of each City to be annexed by the other. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 2. Receive Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval. The BRB may hold its own independent public hearing. 3. A public hearing on the proposed annexation must be held by the annexing City Council. Thus, both Renton and Tukwila must hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation actions for the property owners in their respective anne)(ation areas. Notice of a public hearing at which an anne)(ing resolution is to be adopted shall be mailed to the owners of the property within the area proposed to be anne)(ed in the same manner that notices of hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by a City as provided in RCW 35.43: Notice of the hearing upon a resolution declaring the intention of the legislative authority of a city or town to order an anne)(ation shall be given by mail at least fifteen days before the 'day fi)(ed for hearing to the owners or reputed owners of all lots, tracts, and parcels of land or other property to be included in the anne)(ation, as shown on the rolls of the County Assessor, directed to the address thereon shown. 4. Adoption of an anne)(ing resolution will start a thirty day protest period. If the owners of property in the anne)(ation area equal in value to si)(ty percent or more of the total property value in the annexation area protest the anne)(ation in writing to the anne)(ing City Council within this thirty day period, then the anne)(ation shall be restrained. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 5. If no or insufficient protest is received from property owners in the anne)(ation area: then the anne)(ation shall automatically become effective at the end of the thirty day period. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 1661G CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be In the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential .areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, 00 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify Its common boundary with the City of Tukwila. ,....'-... --, ..... RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ SECTION 1II: The City of Renton supports the annexation of certain areas currently located in the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue s.w. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the de-annexation of the above described areas from the City of Tukwila. SECTION IV: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: ~ See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set:.. forth. (Property located generally between the west Valley Highway (SR-I 8 I) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the de-annexation of the above properties from the City of Renton. This formal request is conditioned upon the actual annexation to the City of' Renton of all those lands described in Section 3. SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton intends to pursue the resolution of these issues along the lines of the following recommendations. However. the actual agreements between the two cities will be determined in future negotiations. I. Local costs of the future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks should be shared equitably between the two cities. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to ensure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. -2- RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ In pursuit of this guideline, both cities agree to designate Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street improvement as a high priority item on each city's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80 percent, federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. 2. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two cities should also pursue the possibility of adding S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street to the state highway system and support S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander/S.W. 27th Street railroad crossing. In pursuit of this guideline, both cities agree to designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each city's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80 percent, federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. 3. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in the area to be de-annexed by the City of Tukwila. 4. The City of Renton's share of the cost of the dike maintenance plan was 22 percent. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River dikes should reflect the fact that Renton would no longer have any Green River frontage and that, therefore, Renton would have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. -3 - 19B6. 19B6. RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ 5. The City of Tukwila should assume maintenance and future widening costs for the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/South 1 BOth Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBJ) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 6. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operations and maintenance. The City of Tukwila should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in a deanne xed area shall not be imposed. 7. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-IBI between S.W. 43rd and 1-405. B. The City of Renton and the City of Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions consistent with the boundary line shown by Exhibit 'A'. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ____ day of ______ _ Ma)(ine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney - 4 - "" ,.~ '" , . CITY OF RENTON CITY OF TUKWILA INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ON UTILITIES WHEREAS. the cities of Renton and Tukwila are straightening the existing irregular boundary line between the two communities. and WHEREAS. the City of Renton has invested funds to provide upgraded utilities to the area north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the West Valley Road. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED THA T SECTION I: The City of Renton will retain ownership of the sewer and water utility systems in the area bounded by S.W. 43rd Street on the south; westerly to the existing city limits boundary with Tukwila on the Green River; northerly to the logical easterly extension of Minckler Bouievard; and easterly to the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. SECTION II: The City of Renton agrees to maintain and operate those sewer and water activities for the benefit of those property owners in the area as if they were residents of the City of Renton. SECTION III: Any developing or redeveloping property in the area will be permitted to connect to .ei~h8l' the sewer and/or water systerrl$\ as if they were residents of the City of Renton. ·' i I J CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERT AIN AREAS FROM THE CITV OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANO REQUESTING THE CITV OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLV WITHIN THE CORPORA TE LlM~.s.J;.JHE CITV OF I f\l .... " ...... ~h""~ -vHW •• 't"'-'\ Il--fY-.I} (('~C(~+o RENTON ~C'. 41', • ...,4 ~{z ...s ,'/'''''$ /) f:c. "f"LY eK,d!euk ...... ':..;~wi ,'(4. a..i~,""'Ylos".", WHEREA~"m~ trn4~6~dh'~fiilIM corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is Irregular and does not follow an easily identi fied natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary Is difficult for residents. businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and • Wt-IEREAS, staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential. #- areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, NOW THEREFOR~""~~~"''\'t' THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION 1\: The City of Renton he~ establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the' City of TUkWi~U~(1-f,; f1.o v-e. c .. p~ ~11Jl.~.,..,.. 41e.~~Gw*-i f\ .«,c,1AJ "3~,IO, J-17 ,'<,,-SOLUTION NO. · SEC TlON III: The City of Ren 4n ~;~!!:l~4~::,:!; ~; ~:a;~t areas currently loc ted In th Cit of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: " ee Exhibit""'" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if ully set forth. ~' Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) J f ~a...f.".,. I>.. ~ (..1., 0 (TfJ fcw.-l ceJI' D~.&u.h ie"",'ll) 0 C 10 V: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tu WI a annel( ertain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. I'A" See Exhibit. attached hereto and made a part hereof as if ~ly~t~. ~ (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway ~" .....::::O'--iL·(SR-IBI) and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and.I-405.) ..u. _ r.l. ;-(.::rVk-~"A b., f{..Cc·~()fR~ b cel.""""! D"f.sIlc.~",.r,-for'f1-"~'-·T'(D ~. xr-._0 ds dlm\?Ratloll 61 llie bee. e pa opal ~lCS frOm tRB GltY4tf RSiilOAt fflFFRal reqlai 9 st is 6'sQditjooe d WfJ8A tile aclual 6iilidxaLlsn ·0 the City Of PeAteR of aU those laRge described in Secti9~_ SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must b~ mutually b., eo. fsw-'\.-oot. i II. .J.o resolved. Th~ City of Re~~on i,pt.end~ to f:lur~LJe the resolutiQn of these issue aJ~ tr ~.q N»~IN"~ """ C''1brl!(e 'f<I.<7~"",,("-.. -.""" ..... ; ff'O foil .... ; 'oM£~ia..& .. "' __ ,,: ~~~~~~~'~~~~~t w t J. S connection is designed constructed. -. 2 - , iU:.:;QLUTlON NO. ____ _ C In pursuit of this guideline. both ~ agree to designate Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street improvement as a high priority item on each fit(s Transportation Improvement Plan. and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80 e,arcent federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. 2. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity. the .. local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The C LL_' fI;""i~ C-T--lcc..J:k J--:Ik two ,Sitjes. ~uld also purs'!Je~the possibil'i1 y 'cf adding S.W. 43rd Street/South I80th Street to the state highway system an,support S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the StranderIS.W. 27th Street railroad crossing. In pursuit of this guideline. both cities agree to designate this road -, C improvement as a high priority item on each city's Transportation - Improvement Plan. and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80 percent, federal funding for this road improvement project. If - federal funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will n'aotia~ an _ equitable funding option as necessary. (.p)..P,J. rcz-o~~r I~.-J 3. The City of Renton should assume the cost of construction for that p~rtion of the P-I Channel which will be located in the area to be de-anne)(ed by the City of Tukwila. 4. The City of Renton's share of the cost of the dike maintenance plan 'was 22 percent. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River ,r f ~ -/~O , .... ~kes should reflect the fact that Renton would no longe~ have any Green Tuh":/,,,J,.,(t River frontage and that. therefore. Renton ~ have no obligation ;;;-----5iL<r s".sA.oi,p Ire'h '% lewl/'" / J'jt f.f dike maintenance or rehabilitation. -3- 19B6. ·1:._ .JLUTlON NO. The City of Tukwila ~sume maintenance and future widening costs for the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 1 BOth Street. It is understood that the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals .at the intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBl) should be assumed by the City of Kent. 6. An interlocal agreement for utilities should be reached between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila. The City of Renton should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of . a./fco,rfs, the railroad tracks and should be responsible for op'itrations and maintenance. The City of Tukwila should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in a deannexed area shall not be imposed. 7. The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the state for improvements to SR-IBI between S.W. 43rd and 1-405. B. The City of Renton and the City of Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions consistent with the boundary line shown by Exhibit' A'. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ___ _ day of _______ _ Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney -4 - j: I· I i I i ! f' i i: I " I I i I ! ! i i n.rL~i R~I • CITY OF RENTON CITY OF TUKWILA INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ON UTILITIES WHEREAS, the cities of Renton and Tukwila are straightening the existing irregular boundary line between the two communities, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has Invested funds to provide upgraded utilities to the area north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the West Valley Road, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED THA T SECTION I: The City of Renton will retain ownership of the sewer and water utility systems In the area bounded by S.W. 43rd Street on the south: westerly to the existing city limits boundary with Tukwila on the Green River: northerly to the logical easterly extension of Minckler Boulevard: and easterly to the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. SECTION II: The City of Renton agrees to maintain and operate those sewer and water activities for the benefit of those property owners in the area as if they were residents of the City of Renton. SECTION Ill: Any developing or redeveloping property in the area will be permitted to connect to .eiH181 the sewer and/or water systen1$) as if they were residents of the City of Renton. OF R~ .1,. 'V,» f-.. 0 ~ 4tPe ~ (") --~. <c. 1:>-2< r$" "'1""0 SEP"(~~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 3D, 19B6 Area Residents and Property Owners: THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MI LL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 . City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter 80uIevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor SUBJECT: ~ PROPOSED RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT The cities of Renton and Tukwila have been considering the possiblllty of exchanging several parcels of property for the purpose of establishing a more reasonable and functional common boundary between the two communities. Staff from both cities have reviewed and collected a substantial amount of information on this topic and will be presenting the results to both residents and property owners In the next few weeks at an informal information meeting on January 3D, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Council Chambers. This letter is being sent to you as a resident or property owner in the affected areas. Included below is a brief discussion of the purpose of this proposal, the steps required to complete the process, and a summary of some impacts (notably taxes) of such a change. I. PURPOSE This boundary adjustment has been proposed for the following reasons: I. The Green River and several railroad tracks make access to a number of properties very difficult for emergency (police and fire) vehicles. Realignment of the boundaries will result in better service by both cities and also reduce response times. 2. Some businesses are located In one clty but identified by zip code or name in the other city. The most obvious example is Andy's Tukwila Station presently in Renton. Approval of the proposed adjustment will place the diner in Tukwila. 3. A number of property owners with large landholdings (such as Burlington Northern) will have their future development plans greatly simplified by having to deal with only one jurisdiction rather than two. 4. Utility (water and sewer) service and maintenance will be improved because the lines and mains will be accessed more easily by the responsible city. Area Residents January 30, 1986 Page 2 II. PROCEDURE In general there are five (5) steps In the procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: 1. Each City Council will adopt separate resolutions (a) requesting annexation of certain areas by another city and (b) indicating a willingness to annex certain areas from another city. 2. The proposal must receive King County Boundary Review Board approval. 3. Each city must conduct an election for those persons residing within the proposed annexation area to decide if they approve of the annexation. Majority approval Is necessary. 4. If indebtedness is to be assumed by the annexing city and the amount exceeds the constitutional llmit established by state statute, then a city-wide election must be held to receive 3/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since Indebtedness by special purpose districts (roads, sewer, water) and general obllgation bonds (Gene Coulon Park) is usually assigned to properties, not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). . 5. An annexing ordinance must be enacted at a formal public hearing. Ill. IMPACTS The major perceived impacts of the proposed boundary change to property owners would be in the area of property taxes. Listed in the tabie below are the individual levies of the various taxing districts located in the affected code areas of the two cities: . Taxing Districts State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Services City of Renton City of Tukwila School District No. 403 Hospital District No. 1 TOTAL RATES Code 2110 (Renton) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 2.24799 .27673 $11.24534 (per $1,000) Source: King County Department of Assessments Code 2340 (Tukwila) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 $10.79573 (per $1,000) The levies for each city are identical with the exception of the individual city tax levy figures. The result is that an average tax bill would cost the property owner approximately $.40 more per $1,000 in Renton than it would in Tukwila. Area Residents January 30. 19B6 Page 3 other ta)(es levied by the City of Renton include: 1. Sales ta)( B.I%. 2. Utility ta)( 5 %. Other ta)( levied by the City of Tukwila includes: 1.. Sales ta)( 7.9%. The City of Renton aiso charges an annual fee for a business license. This license costs $40 a year or more depending upon the number of employees in the particular business. Tukwila also charges an annual fee for business licenses ranging from $50 a year and up depending upon the number of employees. We hope this information wlll help you to understand what is being proposed but we anticipate that you wlll have some questions. Therefore. we will be presenting an informational meeting on January 30th at 7 p.m. at Tukwila City Hall to answer your questions and discuss the proposed boundary line adjustment with you. In the meantime. if you wish additional information. please contact our offices at the following: 1. Tukwila Planning Department -433-1858. 2. Renton Polley Development Department -235-2552. Sincerely. Larry M. Springer Polley Development Director City of Renton LMS:SM:ss 1558G Brad Collins Planning Director City of Tukwila 1464G I. COMPARATIVE ASSESSED VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue - KOLL BUSINESS PARK (City of Renton) Lot III Lot (12 Lot (13 Lot (14 Lot (15 Lot (16 Lot 117 Lot 118 TOTAL Property Area (Square Footage) Assessed Valuation 65,205 sQ. ft. 60,851 SQ. ft. 48,169 sQ. ft. 59,417 sQ. ft. 258,888 sQ. ft. 139,818 sQ. ft. 200,075 sQ. ft. 192.628 sQ. ft. 1,075,051 sQ. ft. (Developed) (Developed) (Developed) (Under construction) (Developed) (Developed) (Undeveloped) (Undeveloped) $ 516,000 (Land & Improvements) $ 182,500 (Land Only) $1,206,000 (Land & Improvements) $ 163,300 (Land Only) $3,085,000 (Land & Improvements) $1,593,900 (Land & Improvements) $ 500,100 (Land Only) $ 481.500 (Land Only) $7,728,300 Assessed Valuation/sQ. ft. = $7.19 II. ACQUISITIONS FRDM PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE Property Area (Acres) Tax Lot 114 Tax Lot (119 Tax Lot (141 Tax Lot 1142 23.44 40.21 19.05 16.03 Assessed Valuation $ 510,500 (Land Only) $1,751,500 (Land Only, Developed, however) $ 414,900 (Land Only) $ 216,400 (Land Only) TOTAL 98.73 acres/4,300,679 sQ. ft. $2,893,300 Assessed Valuation/SQ. ft. = $0.67 PROJECTED TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION (a) $ 2.00/sQ. ft. = $ 8,601,358 (b) $ 4.00/sQ. ft. = $17,202,716 (c) $ 6.00/sQ. ft. = $25,804,074 (d) $ 8.00/sQ. ft. = $34,405,432 (e) $10.00/sQ. ft. = $43,006,790 RENTON/TUKWILA BORDER EXC~_ -Assessed Valuation and Acreage Analysis - TO TUKWILA TO RENTON MAP NO. PARCEL VALUE AC PARCEL VALUE AC 3.62 13 27 (portion) $ 157,700 12.79 TOTALS 1 parcel $ 157,700 3.62 o parcels 18 63 $ 255,000 2.35 32 200 0.27 28 167,600 3.85 7 MOC 198,300 4.55 TOTALS 4 parcels $ 621,100 11.02 o parcels 21 38 MOC $1,052,500 1.84 41 $ 216,400 19.05 0.91 8 MOC (p) 39,600 2.91 4 510,500 23.44 1.14 9 MOC (p) 49,600 3.05 43 115,700 2.15 50 54,700 0.84 51 33,000 0.72 23 73,700 2.16 6 222,000 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 34,500 44.10 21 MOC 81,500 2.45 2.16 22 (portion 141,600 10.47 TOTALS 11 parcels $1,898,400 23.23 2 parcels $ 726,900 42.49 25 21 $ 544,500 1.61 42 $ 216,400 16.03 59 40,400 0.37 20 1,075,000 2.14 33 1,479,400 3.69 17 645,700 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 102,700 10.43 5.44 24 (portion) 87,000 44.10 22 197,300 3.01 TOTALS 8 parcels $4,172,000 25.20 1 parcel $ 216,400 16.03 MAP NO. PARCEL 26 TOTALS o parcels 29 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 TOTALS 21 parcels TOTALS TO TUKWILA TO RENTON TO TUKWILA VALUE $ 326,700 2,223,700 2,235,100 18,500 1,496,600 10,800 25,100 21,300 350,700 21,300 17,500 35,600 49,100 20,800 32,500 22,800 18,200 18,200 167,200 254,900 162,300 $7,528,900 45 parcels 11 parcels - 2 - AC PARCEL 19 1 parcel 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 38.58 o parcels 0l60(Portion) 0145 0155(Portion) 0150 0320 0330 Lot 112 7 parcels $14,378,100 $ 2,879,745 TO RENTON VALUE $1,751,500 $1,751,500 $ $ 59,508 9,500 42,902 71,800 676 37 522 184,945 101.65 acres 114.01 acres AC 40.21 40.21 11. 79 .29 1.29 1.49 .28 .02 .12 15.28 1531G RENTON-TUKWILA BOUNDARY REVISION INVOLVED LANDOWNERS Landownerl Address Jacob Neilsen 1602 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98055 F. L. Branson. Prop. Dev. Spec. Burlington Northern RR 2100 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle. WA 98104-1105 Union Pacific Corp. P. o. Bo)( 2500 Broomfield. CO 80020 Manufacturers Mineral Co. 1215 Monster Road S.W. Renton. WA 98005 Puget Sound Power and Light Puget Power Building Bellevue. WA 98004 Jerry and Marlene Ivy 4315 7th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98108 Alaskan Copper Co .• Inc. 17300 West Valley Highway Renton. WA 98005 Relco Investment Co. P. o. Bo)( 88700 Tukwila Br. Seattle. WA 98188 Oregon-Washington RR cia Union Pacific RR P. o. Bo)( 2500 Broomfield. CO 80020 West Valley Assoc. 1313 East Prospect Seattle. WA 98112 David Goodwin P. o. Bo)( 497 Wrangell. AK 99929 Parcel(s) 242304-27. 63 242304-28 252304-4. 6. 42. 43. 22 362304-36 MDC -7 MPC -21 142304-0160 (por). Lot 112. 0145 242304-32 242304-106 252304-50.51.23 362304-35 MDC -8 252304-17 252304-20 252304-21. 59 252304-24 . 362304-34 MDC -9 252304-33 362304-7.8 , . Landownerl Address Randall Weitzel 1908 S.W. 43rd Street Renton. WA 98055 Nancy Gladsjo 21416 S.E. 265th Kent. WA 98O:S1 Leigh Rabel Star Machinery Co. 4202 West Valley Road Renton. WA 98055 Gerard M. Shellan II Lummi Key Bellevue. WA 98006 Chi-Tai Chu 4431 N.E. 23rd Ct. Renton. WA 98055 Ernest Patty 2120 S.W. 43rd Renton. WA 98055 Wm. E. Roberts 806 S.W. Broadway Portland. OR 97206 Allen and Joan Cullen 3613 61st S.W. Seattle. WA 98116 CG3 905 S.W. 16th Portland. OR 97205 A. Nagy 2963 4th Avenue South Seattle. WA 98134 - 2 - Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. 14i6 Dodge Street Omaha. NB 68179 Biack River Quarry 6808 South 140th Seattle. WA 98178 Parcel(s) 362304-9 362304-10. 14.29 362304-11.61 362304-13 362304-37. 43 362304-38. 39. 53 362304-57.97 362304-59 362304-62 MDC -38 142304-0155 (por). 0330 142304-0150. O:S20 (par) Rento Ikwila Boundary Adjustment _ ,ap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton • LONGACRES Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton -+-- Lands to Tukwila t, o 2.000' 112.1/8'- , ------~--------------------------------------------- ------1---------------------------------------'----------'--------- - ----~-------------------------------------- ---~~----------------------------------- ------1--------------------------------------- ------11------------------------------------------ ----Il---------~-----_______________________ _ -----1-'---------------'-----------~-------------- -----11----------------------------'------------------------- ------11----------------------------------------------------- -----11--------'------------------------------------------------------- --------1----------------------------------------______ ---------_____ _ ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- " -------41----------------------------------- -----Jl.------------------------------------- -----~f-------------------------'-' ------------ ------Jl------------------------------------- ------11---------------------__ ----------- -----li-II ---------------__ ---------_______ _ J - J~~ r,~~~~,~~~~ _______ . ___________ ~ ________ _ a ..a u .. /J. -.4. , , I T • . ~ rj-' -------+------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -------+--------------------------~~------------------ ------11----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ---------IC--------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------~---- .. ...... _._ .. __ =~_ ~._ ~~=ti\'_'f\~.d._ .. ___ d .. ___ ... . ___. ___ ...... . • -. _. --------_.-----._---.--~-----.----.---_. -~ '" ~, '. " • _ -4_ , , " " .L , \ , " ~ -- " I \ .. - . \ :--:..' ~J' ,~ .. , f), -4-___ "-_'_ " --'""':------ ,;, ----- -.' " , - " \ .'" I . -.' __ 00.-. ___ ....:. ___ L . -L--.' ______ ,_, , .:...,t __ ~_ r " , .I.. __ _ .--- . ~ .... ," . --. ..:.; -' , , . ----;.. • ----,-- 'I ! ,,' '. --!-. v' -v- .'.-- ----------~-...-----, ....,·l~· ~-', .~ '''-'- -.... -"--.. --- , \ .0;. ' . -. r--~-~ ~J--;-1- -1--- 1 I -" I --j , r 1 ---~=--I '. ,WAC 197-11-970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CITY OF RENTON JAN 29 1986 Descr i pt i on of Propos a l __ T_u k_w_i_l_a_A_n_n_e_x_a t_i_o_n_Po_l_i_c,,-Y_P_l_a_n_-----'-p_r_o_v 1_' d_i_n,:.g_g:.-u_i_d_e...:.l, 1_' n_e_s __ for elected officials. staff and concerned citizens regarding consideration and review of annexation proposals and their possible impacts Proponent, ___ C_it~y_o_f_T_u_k_w_il_a _________ ~ _____________ __ Location of Proposal. including street address. if any ____________ _ Unincorporated King County areas contiguous to Tukwila which may desire annexation to Tukwil a Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-30a 86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined'that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. o [] There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by February 12. 1986 • The 1 ead agency will not act on th i s proposal for 15 days from the date below. Respons i b 1 e Offi ci a 1 __ , '_Br""ac...d_l..:ceY"--J",,,.'--,-C.;..o l_l-'i_n..:..s _________________ _ Pos i t i onlT it 1 e, ___ -'P_'l.::.a!!:nn~i:.!.!n.ll.g_'D::.;i..:..r=:ec:::.;t:.!:o~r __________ ___'Phone 433-1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila. WA 98188 D ate,_-",J a""n""u"'a.:....ryL..:;.2""82. • ...:1~9~8::..6 ____ ' Sign ature, __ -l1.,;(.2~'v.-=<_'_'-C.h.\.::>._(:::.~~::::,.k:....=..'~_'.:....::.::..-_____ _ You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila. WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available,with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS I' : on t. '" I No. ...J,~w",-,1l?I~,--__ _ E pic File No. ....f1:H"""'--'. c.","~ ___ _ Fee SlOO.OO Receipt No. __ _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Tukwila Annexation Policy Plan 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of Rebecca Fox 433~1848 applicant and contact person:· 4. Date checklist prepared: January 21, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No specific plans. Policies may be reviewed, ammended pen"·o::ld"Tic::Ca""l""Tl77y-. ---- 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. _____ _ None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? explain. "McLees" annexation application currenH:t in process. Fire bistrict #1 annexatlon on hold penolng resolutlon of Seattle/South Park annexatlon. ~2- of other If yes, 10. List any government approvals or permi ts that wi 11 be needed for your proposal.; Passage of Tykwjla resolutj~n and ordinance adopting policies SEPA approval. -------------- -------- 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that aSK you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. _Polic~ui~inlL-annexations to Tukwila. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, townShip, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur ov~r a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a leg~l description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonabl'y avai 1 ab 1 e. Wh i 1 e you shou 1 d submit any plans requ i red by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this Checklist. 13. Potential annexation areas include various unincorporated King Coun~J!!eas _._ --contiguous to Tukwila. _._---_._------------------ Does the proposal lie within an area deSignated on Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? ~11!.~~reas de5iri~nn~xatioJLto Tuj<wilLmay be __ .::s.enstti'{.~_areas . ____ _ -3- the City's Comprehensive Land -, TO BE COMPLETED BY LIt.. "t T 6. ENV lRuNMtNTAL ELEMEIHS 1. Earth a. General description of-the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, varied . Flat, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) 1 ___ -.:,:N!.,;/A:.;,.-__________ _ c. What genera I types of so il s are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ____ _ -N/A- d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the ilTlnediate vicinity1 If so, describe. -N/A- e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fi 11. _________________ _ -N/A- f. Could erosion occur construction, or use1 -N/A- as a result of clearing, If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? ________ _ -N/A- -4- Evaluat ion for Agency Use unly h. Proposed measures to reduce or control eros ion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ______________ _ -N/A- 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal ( i. e. , dust, automobi1e odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Policies may eventually result in annexation of hlghly developed areas wlth potentlal alr emlSSlon problems. ~----------------------- Are there any off-site sources of that may affect your proposal? emissions or odor If so, generally describe.:;-_____ _ ___ -. ..:.N ..... /!..!.A-____________ _ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: __ --.-.- Adherence to appropriate air pollution requirements 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Green River, Anql e Lake, ~Bo-Ji--;-L-<!.7""~ ___ _ ------------------- -5- -valuation for .,gency Use Only , . · . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. An ne xa t i on c:-:o"'u"""'d""'o""c:-::c"u:-::r""'lr.· n:-;:st;"h o~r;;;e=li ne zone. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wet I ands and i nd icate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ____________ _ -N/A- ------- 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. -N/A- 5) Does the proposal 1 ie within. a lOO-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Ann-ex-a~t'i-o-ns~c~o-uT'd~o~c~c~ur~1~n~10mO~-~y~e~ar~'f~l~o~od"'p~l-'a~ln 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ______ . __ _ -N/A-- -6- Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Gi~e general description, purpose, and approx imate quan· tities, if known. _____________ _ ·N/A· 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour· ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be ser~ed (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. ·N/A· --------------------- c. Water ~unoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ________ . _____ _ -N/A- ------------------- -7- ~~aluation for Agency Use Only · . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, genera11y describe. ___ _ -N/A- -------------._------------- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: _____ __ -N/A-____ _ ------------- 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: -N/A- dec iduous tree: evergreen tree: -shrubs grass -pasture alder, maple, aspen. other fir, cedar, pine, other -crop or grain -wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bu11rush; skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass. milfoil. other === other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetat ion wi 11 be removed or altered? -N/ A-____ _ ----------- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. _____ _ -N/A-__ _ ------------------------------- -8- Evaluat ion for Agency Use un ly d. Proposed measures site, if landscaping, use of native plants, or other to preserve or enhance vegetat ion on the any: -N/A..------- ----------_._------------ -------------------- 5. Animals a. Circle any birds observed on or near or near the site: and animals which have been the site or are known to be on birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: -N/A- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ________________ __ --------- c. Is the site part of a migration route? explain. -N/A-. _____________________ __ If so, ._-------------_._---- d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -N/ A- -----------------------------.------------- -9- valuation for I\ge~cy Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. -N/A- -------- b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe._-,.:,N:..I./""'A'--______________ _ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: _______________ _ -N/A- ----------------------------- 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ______ ~/A- 1) Describe special emergency services that might be requ ired. _____________ _ ·-N/A- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or contro 1 env i ron- mental health hazards, if any: ______ __ -N/A- -10- Eval'Jat ion for Agency Use 0n 1 y b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, otherl1 _________ _ __ -N/A-__ _ __ _ ._-------- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or as soc iated with the project on a short- term or a long-term bas is (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. __ _ -N/A- 3) Proposed measures to reduce or contro 1 no ise impacts, if any: ___ _ -N/A- 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? -N~- b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. -N/A- c. Describe any structures on the site. ______ _ -N/A- -11- valuation for Agency Use On 1 y d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, ~Ihat? -N/A-______________ . ___ • __ _ -----------------------_.- e. What is the current zon ing c I ass if icat ion of the site? Various King County zone designations. f. What is the current comprehens ive p I an des i gnat ion of the site? Various Comprehensive plan desisDations. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? _______ _ -N/A- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. -N/A- i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ___ -.;..:N'-'./ A.:..-. ______ ==--===----------= j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? . __ -,-N:L./. A---------=-_-_-_-=~_-_~== k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: -N/A-----~---_-------.-- I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: _________ _ -N/A- -12- Eva luat ion for Agency Use Only 9. Hous ing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any1 Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing1 -N/A- b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated1 Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.r-_______ _ -N/A- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ___ _ -N/A- 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materia1(s) proposed? -N/A-____ ~_ ---------------------------------- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be c. altered or obstructed? ___ _ -N/A- Proposed impacts, measures to reduce or control aesthetic if any: ________________ __ -N/A- -----------_._---------- -13- ·valuat ion for "gency Use On ly 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? -N/A- b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ___ . ___ _ -N/A-\ --- c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your ~NJ~?Sal1--- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control 1 ight and glare impacts.1 if any: -N/A-------------- ._--------- 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? _____ _ -N/A- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ____ _ -N/A- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on ' recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: -N/A-. ---------"-'------------------ -14- Eva I uat ion for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ____________________ _ -N/A- b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the s ite. ____ _ -N/A- c. Proposed measures to reduce or contro 1 impacts, if any: -~N~/llA-~ __________________ _ 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ______ __ -N/A- b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? -N/A- c. How many parking spaces would the completed proj ect have? How many wou ld the project e I imi nate? ___ _ -N/A- -15- valuation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). -N/A----- e. W ill the project use (or occur in the ilTlT1ed i ate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. -lYA- f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ____ . -N/A- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: -N/A------------- 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools. other)? If so, generally describe. Annexation would proba~b~l-y-r=equrre ln~reas~JruDlrr.: services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or contro I d irec t Evaluation for Agency Use On ly impacts on public services, if any. Policies stipulate the following ~rl1,es for service provision: 1) majntain existl~acl1lTIes; 2) J!Pjrade existin facilities and services tOi'UT<WiTii""stanaards; 3 provide new Jaci1TIlesand services to supfiCiY't planned growth. -16- 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service. telephone, sanitary sewer. septic system. other. -N/A- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the util i'ty providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the inmediate vicinity which might be needed. Tukwila cM services as appropriate. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowl edge. I understand that the 1 ead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submi tted: -17- ~valuation for ..;gency Use On ly TO BE COMPLETED BY "'LI~ . T D. SuPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The annexation eolicy plan mi~ht indirectly result in an increase in dlscharge or emlSSlons, etc., to Evaluat ion for Agency Use Only the extend that it results in increased annexations to Tukwila. bependin a on the actual land use, the annexation may result in increase noise, emissions, etc., in Tukwila. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Adherence to: 1 Tukwila Zonin Code' 2 Com rehensive Plan; 3 Buildin Code' 4 Permittin re uirements' 5 Building ins ections; 6 ulrements; lre pecial or 1 nances passe ci ty Council. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? ________________________ __ Unknown. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals. fish, or marine life are: Adherence to: 1) SEPA . review' 2 Plannin Commission and Board of Architectural Review consideration of deve opment. -18- valuation for Mgency Use \Jnly 3. How would the proposal be I ikely to deplete energy or natural resources? To the extent that Tukwila's Annexation Policies resulted in increased annexation activity in Tukwila, energy or natural resources might be used more intensively. conserve energy and 2 Permittin 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Unknown Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:~ __ ~~~ __ ~~~ __ ~ ______ ~ Adherence to: 1) SEPA guidelines; 2) Shoreline reguirements. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Policies state thatl)'Land use proposed fol' an area to be annexed should be consistent with Tukwila's adopted Comprehensive Plan Policies and other land use requirements." and, 2) In newly annexed areas, buildings and facilities which do not comply with Tukwila's zoning and other code requirements shall be considered non-conform- i nq uses." The po Ii ci es encourage observance of existing Tukwil a pI ans. -19- , '. · .' ~roposed measures to avoid or reduce shorel ine and land use imp ac ts ar ea :"T"",.-..",...,--,.,.....---.,..,...,----;-;----:-:---:::-:-~ All areas annexed to Tukwila would be subject to Tukwila's Zoning Code. Shoreline Master Plan. and Comprehensive Plan which would rovide uidance for reducin or avoidin sore ine an and use impacts. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shorel ine Mas ter Plan? . Any a rea a n':"ne~x:::e=-=d;-::"to:--:;T;:-u7:k:-:w7'ilr:a~w=-ou:":'lr:d;--;:"b=-e -:r:::e=-=g:::u'i r:::e=-=d;-::"t=-o -c=-=o"'n""'f=o r'm with Tukwila's Shoreline Master Plan. Evaluation for. Agency Use Only 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Areas annexed to Tukwila as a result of TukwilaT's:-;A~n:-:n=-ex~a'tion Policies would require transportation (i.e. road) services. public services and ytilities as appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Policies provide guidelines to respond to public service demands resulting from annexation by specifying that the City "should maintain service levels for Tukwila's existing citizens when new areas are considered for annexation." Further, the Pol ides state that facilities and services will be provided to newly annexed areas according to h f llowi r'ori i s: 1 maintain existin facilities; 2) upgrade existin facilities and services' and 3 rovide new facilities and services to support planned growth. 7. Identify. if possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal would not conflict wi7t~h~l;-:0-c~a·l-.-:s~t~a~te-o-r-- federal reguirements for protection of the environment. -20- 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Pol icy Plan? If so, '~hat pol i- c i es of the Plan1 _______________ _ No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -N/A- -21- 'valuation for ,-\gency Use On ly TO BE COMPLETED BY , ·'.11 •..• T E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal1::-:=r-__ Goals of proposal are to provide guidance and direction to Tukwila elected officials, staff and those considering annexation to Tukwila regarding annexatlon and its liKely effects. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? ____________ ~----- None ' . 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: ___________ _ -N/A- -22- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what pol i-cies of the Plan? _______________ _ No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the confl ict(s) are: -N/A- -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLICIES 1.0 GENERAL STATEMENTS ON ANNEXATION 1.1 The City of Tukwila strongly encourages annexations within ,its planning area and contiguous to the City boundaries. COMMEI~TS: For purposes of planned growth and f i sca I respons i b iIi ties, Tukwila should, for the immediate future, consider annexations within the planning area and adjacent special use districts. 1.2 The City of Tukwila will freely make available to persons/areas interested in annexation any information related to its taxes or services. Each annexation process should emphasize public information and clear com- munication among the Tukwila community, City government and the area under consideration. COMMENTS: Upon request, City Council members, the Mayor, and other appropriate persons as designated by the Mayor will be available to attend meetings, provide information and explain the City's annexation policy. , 1.3 Tukwila and King County should work together through interlocal agreements to implement coordinated local policy which will provide municipal ser- vices. COMMENTS: Specific annexation proposals have a greater chance of success if they are coordi nated with I oca I po Ii cy and recei ve support from other jurisdictions. 1.4 lin annexation report sha11 be presented to the City Counci I for all annexations. Major annexati~ns should include a thorough study/assessment of the area under consideration, a financial report analysiS, and a plan for meeting the area's service needs. CuMME,~TS: This policy wi11 ensure that Tukwila has an appropriate assessment of the annexation area. This wi11 include the potential costs and benefits to the community, consideration of any existing Capital Improvement Plans and, when necessary, a plan for providing municipal services to the area. This approach is intended to make the annex at i on process smoother and more predictable. 2.0 METHOO OF ANNEXATION The most appropriate means to accomplish annexations may be either an election or a petition, depending upon the size of the area and the number of property owners involved. COMMENTS: With few property owners involved, the petition method is genera lly eas i er. With many property owners i nvo I ved, the election method may be the easier. TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLICIES Page 2 3.0 SILE uF ANNEXATION A~EAS 3.1 The City allows and encourages annexation regardless of the size of the area. COMMENTS: The City has an open arms policy toward annexation. 3.2 Tukwila encourages annexations of a sufficiently large size for efficient processing and provision of municipal services. COMMENTS: Annexations of all sizes will help Tukwila grow and reach its planning area boundaries. Larger annexations are generally a more efficient means to bring territory into Tukwila's jurisdiction. 4.0 ANNEXATION COSTS 4.1 Tukwila will pay the basic costs of the annexation process incl~ding admi- nistration, environmental threshold determination, and filing fees. If an annexation requires an Environmental Impact Statement (US), TUKwila will consider assuming the costs on a case-by-case basis. CuMMENTS: Tukwila hopes to encourage annexations by taking on the routine costs of annexation. EIS work can be very costly and Tukwila will consider each case individually. 4.2 Assuming Tukwila's bonded indebtedness shall be considered on a case-by- case basis. COMMENTS: The general purpose facilities developed for any bond issue provide services for all Tukwila and any area joining Tukwila through annexation. Different tax rates which foster different service expectations among citizen groups should be avoided. ** NOTE ** The Committee recommends that indebtedness be refinanced as general obligation thereby eliminating the bonded indebtedness issue from annexation consideration. 5.0 BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY The boundaries of the City are a result of petitioners' actions and what- ever form they take is of little significance. CuMMENTS: The City will need to develop its plans on how to best service an area regardless of the City's boundaries. TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLIC. Page 3 6.0 SERVICE 6.1 The City should maintain service levels for Tukwila's existing citizens when new areas are considered for annexation. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that the present service levels to residents and businesses will not be diminished because of annexation. 6.2 The City should provide for facilities and services for newly annexed areas according to the following guidelines: 1. First, to maintain existing facilities and services; 2. Second, to upgrade existing facilities and services to Tukwila stan- dards; 3. Third, to provide new facilities and services to support planned· growth. C0MMENrS: This policy will provide a consistent basis for identifying needs and setting priorities to furnish facilities and services in a newly annexed area. 6.3 Tukwil a shou 1 d determi ne whether or not to assume management of fi re, ' sewer, or water districts in annexation areas on a case-by-case basis sub- ject to the requirements of RCW 35.13A. CuMMENTS: Tukwila's planning areas include portions of several special purpose districts providing water, sewer, and fire services. In light of the individual factors pertaining to the operation of each, the decision to assume administration should be made on a case-by-case basis. City Council members, the Mayor, and other appropriate persons as designated by the Mayor should contact the affected special purpose districts. 7.0 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS (EMPLOYEES) The City will retain the employees of special purpose districts when it assumes the ownership and administration of the district. COMMENTS: There is presently state law requiring this. The State RCW reads as follows: 35.13.A.090 Employment rights of district employees. Whenever a city acquires all of the facilities of a water district or sewer district, pursuant to this chapter, such a City shall offer to employ every full time employee of the district who is engaged in the operation of such a district's facilities on the date on which such city acquires the district facilities. when a city acquires any portion of the facilities of such a district, such a city shall offer to employ full time employees of the district as of the date of the acquisition of , TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLICIES Page 4 7.0 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS (EMPLOYEES) -Continued the facilities of the district who are no longer needed by the dis tri ct. Whenever a city e~loys a person who has e~loyed immediately prior thereto by the district, arrangements shall be made: (1) For the retention of service credits under the pension plan of the district pursuant to KCW 41.04.070 through 41.04.110; (2) F or the retent i on of all sick 1 eave stand i ng to the emp 1 oyee' s credit in the plan of such district; (3) For a vacation with pay during the first year of employment equivalent to that to which he would have been entitled if he had remained in the employment of the district. (1971 1st ex.s. c 9~ § 9.) 8.0 PLANNING AND ZuNING S.! The land use proposed for an area to be annexed should be consistent with Tukwila's adopted Comprehensive Plan Policies and other land use require- ments. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that zoning for annexation areas shall be determi ned both accord i ng to Tukwi 1 a's Comprehens i ve Plan and in consideration of existing uses in the area. 8.2 Tukwila should consider simultaneous zoning for annexations on a case-by- case basis. COMMENTS: Simultaneously adopting the zoning designation for the annexa- tion area and the annexation itself will provide predictability for the City of Tukwila, property owners, and residents involved in an annexation action. 8.3 In newly annexed areas, buildings and facilities which do not comply with Tukwi la's zoning and other code requirements shall be considered non- conforming uses. COMMENTS: Designating-non-conforming uses in newly annexed areas wi 11 ensure that they are treated the same as existing non- conforming uses in Tukwila. CAC.l-.4 OF R.~ ~ tV,>. f... ~ ~~~ '6 -~ 'lI.., <0' 0-9. ~~ "17'£;0 SEP1I:.\I'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 23, 1986 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 -------- City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433·1800 Gary L VanDusen. Mayor Area Residents and Property Owners: SUBJECT: PROPOSED RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT The cities of Renton and Tukwila have been considering the possibility of e)(changing several parcels of property for the purpose of establishing a more reasonable and functional common boundary between the two communities. Staff from both cities have reviewed and collected a substantial amount of information on this topic and will be presenting the results to both residents and property owners in the ne)(t few weeks at an Informal Information meeting on January 30, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Council Chambers. This letter is being sent to you as a resident or property owner in the affected areas. Included below Is a brief discussion of the purpose of this proposal, the steps required to complete the process, and a summary of some impacts (notably ta)(es) of such a change. I. PURPOSE This boundary adjustment has been proposed for the following reasons: I. The Green River and several railroad tracks make access to a number of properties very difficult for emergency (police and fire) vehicles. Realignment of the boundaries w\ll result in better servIce by both cities and also reduce response times. 2. Some businesses are located In one city but identified by zip code or name in the other city. The most obvious e)(ample is Andy's Tukwila Station presently in Renton. Approval of the proposed adjustment will place the diner in Tukwila. 3. A number of property owners with large landholdings (such as Burlington Northern) will have their future development plans greatly simplified by having to deal with only one Jurisdiction rather than two. 4. Utility (water and sewer) service and maintenance will be improved because the lines and mains will be accessed more easily by the responsible city. , Area Residents January n, 1986 Page 2 II. PROCEDURE In general there are five (5) steps in the procedure for the Renton/Tukwila boundary line adjustment: 1. Each City Council will adopt separate resolutions (a) requesting anne>eation of certain areas by another city and (b) indicating a willingness to anne>e certain areas from another city. 2. The proposal must receive King County Boundary Review Board approval. ~. Each city must conduct an eiection for those persons residing within the proposed anne>eation area to decide if they approve of the anne>eation. Majority approval is necessary. 4. If indebtedness is to be assumed by the anne>eing city, then a city-wide election must be held to receive ~/5 voter approval. This step is not anticipated to be required since indebtedness by special purpose districts (roads, sewer, water) and general obligation bonds (Gene Coulon Park) is usually assigned to properties, not administrative jurisdictions (per County Auditor's Office). 5. An anne>elng ordinance must be enacted at a formal public hearing. lll. IMPACTS The major perceived impacts of the proposed boundary change to property owners would be in the area of property ta>ees. Listed in the table below are the individual levies of the various ta>eing districts located In the affected code areas of the two cities: Ta>eing Districts State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Services City of Renton City of Tukwila School District No. 403 Hospital District No. 1 TOTAL RATES Code 2110 (Renton) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 2.24799 .27673 $11.24534 (per $1,000) Source: King County Department of Assessments Code 2340 (Tukwila) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 $10.79573 (per $1,000) The levies for each city are identical with the e>eception of the individual city ta>e levy figures. The result is that an average ta>e bill would cost the property owner appro>Cimately $.40 more per $1,000 in Renton than It would in Tukwila. Area Residents January 23, 1986 Page 3 Other taxes levied by the City of Renton include: 1. Sales tax 8.1 %. 2. Utility tax 5%. other tax levied by the City of Tukwila includes: 1. Sales tax 7.9%. The City of Renton also charges an annual fee for a business license. This license costs $40 a year or more depending upon the number of employees In the particular business. Tukwila also charges an annual fee for business licenses ranging from $50 a year and up depending upon the number of employees. We hope this information will help you to understand what is being proposed but we anticipate that you will have some questions. Therefore, we will be presenting an informational meeting on January 30th at 7 p.m. at Tukwila City Hall to answer your questions and discuss the proposed boundary line adjustment with you. In the meantime, If you wish additional information, please contact our offices at the following: I. Tukwila Planning Department -433-1858. 2. Renton Policy Development Department -235-2552. ringe Policy Development Director City of Renton LMS:SM:ss 1558G Brad Collins Planning Director City of Tukwila 1464G COMPARATIVE ASSESSED 'VALUATIONS -Renton/Tukwila Boundary Issue - 1. KOLLBUSINESS PARK (City of Renton) Property Area (Square Footage) Assessed Valuation Lot III 65,205 sq. ft. (Developed) $ 516,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot 112 60,851 sq. ft. (Developed) $ 182,500 (Land Only) Lot 113 48,169 sq. ft. (Developed) $1,206,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot 114 59,417 sq. ft. (Under Construction) $ 163,300 (Land Only) Lot 115 258,888 sq. ft. (Developed) $3,085,000 (Land & Improvements) Lot 116 139,818 sq. ft. (Developed) $1,593,900 (Land & Improvements) Lot 117 200,075 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) $ 500,100 (Land Only) Lot 118 192.628 sq. ft. (Undeveloped) $ 481.500 (Land Only) TOTAL 1,075,051 sq. ft. $7,728,300 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $7.19 II. ACQUISITIONS FROM PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE Property Area (Acres) Tax Lot 114 Tax Lot 1119 Tax Lot 1141 Tax Lot 1142 23.44 40.21 19.05 16.03 Assessed Valuation $ 510,500 (Land Only) $1,751,500 (Land Only, Developed, however) $ 414,900 (Land Only) $ 216.400 (Land Only) TOTAL 98.73 acres/4,300,679 sq. ft. $2,893,300 Assessed Valuation/sq. ft. = $0.67 PROJECTED TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION (a) $ 2.00/sq. ft. = $ 8,601,358 (b) $ 4.00/sq. ft. = $17,202,716 (c) $ 6.00/sq. ft. = $25,804,074 (d) $ 8.00/sq. ft. = $34,405,432 (e) $10.00/sq. ft. = $43,006,790 RENTON/TUKWILA BORDER EXCHANGE -Assessed Valuation and Acreage Analysis - TO TUKWILA TO RENTON MAP NO. PARCEL VALUE AC PARCEL VALUE AC 3.62 13 27 (portion) $ 157,700 12.79 TOTALS 1 parcel $ 157,700 3.62 o parcels 18 63 $ 255,000 2.35 32 200 0.27 28 167,600 3.85 7 MOC 198,300 4.55 TOTALS 4 parcels $ 621,100 11.02 o parcels 21 38 MOC $1,052,500 1.84 41 $ 216,400 19.05 0.91 8 MOC (p) 39,600 2.91 4 510,500 23.44 1.14 9 MOC (p) 49,600 3.05 43 115,700 2.15 50 54,700 0.84 51 33,000 0.72 23 73,700 2.16 6 222,000 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 34,500 44.10 21 MOC 81,500 2.45 2.16 22 (portion 141,600 10.47 TOTALS 11 parcels $1,898,400 23.23 2 parcels $ 726,900 42.49 25 21 $ 544,500 1.61 42 $ 216,400 16.03 59 40,400 0.37 20 1,075,000 2.14 33 1,479,400 3.69 , 17 645,700 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 102,700 10.43 5.44 24 (portion) 87,000 44.10 22 197,300 3.01 TOTALS 8 parcels $4,172,000 25.20 1 parcel $ 216,400 16.03 MAP NO. PARCEL 26 TOTALS o parcels 29 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 TOTALS 21 parcels TOTALS TO TUKWILA TO RENTON TO TUKWILA VALUE $ 326,700 2,223,700 2,235,100 18,500 1,496,600 10,800 25,100 21,300 350,700 21,300 17,500 35,600 49,100 20,800 32,500 22,800 18,200 18,200 167,200 254,900 162,300 $7,528,900 45 parcels 4 parcels -2 - AC PARCEL 19 1 parcel 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 38.58 o parcels $14,378,100 $ 2,694,800 TO RENTON VALUE $1,751,500 $1,751,500 101.65 acres 98.73 acres AC 40.21 40.21 OF ",4. t; \'-'Fe ~.... -~ -~ ~ '1>' "b~ «,~ 1"£:0 SEP"{E."'~ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH . MAYOR January 16, 1986 Fred Branson Burlington Northern 2100 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-4080 Dear Mr. Brenson: THE CITY OF·RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055. ) As I discussed with you over the telephone this week, there is some question about the ownership of Tax Lot #41 in Section 25-2)-4 of the Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment. The King County Assessor's files indicate a 1986 owner of Bro.adacr~ Inc. (Longacres) and the 1985 sheets list Meridian Land and Mineral Company of Billings, Montana, as the owner. It has been our understanding since the negotiations began in August, 1985, that your firm owned this parcel. As you know, the County's records are not always current regarding present ownerships. It sometimes takes several years to reflect· such changes. We have enclosed for your reference a map indicating the parcels we have record&#for your ownership and the property (Tax Lot (~1) in question. We would appreciate hearing from you as soon as possible as to whether or not your firm owns this parcel; and if not, who you may have sold it to. If you have indeed sold it, we would like to have you send our office some documentation so noting. The ownership must be clear in order for the City of Renton to properly notify all owners of the public hearing for zoning of the properties scheduled for. February 9,1987. I hope this request is clear. Should you have any questions, please call me or write this office. Very truly yours, steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:cb:2)90G OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON, WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 828 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8878 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY . January 2, 1986 TO: steve Munson, Assistant Planner DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZAN ETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Proposed Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Dear Steve: By memo dated December 13, 1985, you asked me to comment upon the City of Tukwila's analysis of the procedures necessary to adjust the city boundaries between Renton and .Tukwila. . Basically, the procedures outlined by the Tukwila memorandum are no different than those referred to in my prior memo under RCW 35A.16. The City of Tukwila relies on RCW 35.10.217. Both statutory sections permit the change in boundaries by (1) a resolution by the City concerning deannexation, (2) an election by the qualified electors in the district, (3) a method of. handling liability for indebtedness and for Boundary Review Board approval. This last requirement is presumed necessary because of the basic jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board. If you have any other questions, please let me know. LJW:nd cc: Mayor ~ J. Warren CITY OF RENTON 'AN 3 1986 POLICY nFV~I.OPME~T n~PT. HOUSE BILL NO. 1386 State of Washington 49th Legislature 1986 Regular Session by Representatives Hine, Jacobsen and Isaacson Prefiled with Chief Cler~6~ Read first ti ~-nd . referred to Committee on~~ernment. ~ AN ACT Relating to the annexation of all or part of a city or 2 town by another city 'or town: and amending Rew 35.10.217. 3 BE IT ENACTED BY TIlE LEGISLAruRE OF TIlE STATE OF WASHINGTON: 4 Sec. 1. Section •• chapter 89, Laws of 1969 ex. sess. as amended 5 by section IS. Chapter 281. Laws of 1985 and RCW 35.10.217 are each 6 amended to read as follows: 7 The following methods are available for the annexation of all or 8 • part of a city ~ to another city ~: 9 (I) A petition for an election to vote upon the annexation «ef 10 .11·er·.·,art-ef-a-E'ty-te·aRether-EitY.8ilft~·~y-~¥alifie4·veteFs-ef 11 t~e-e'ty·,repese4-te-~e-aftftexe4-e~¥al-ift·ftHa~eF·te·at·least·eRe·fifth 12 ef-the-yetes·east·at·the·last·~ftiEi,al·lefteFal·eleetieft·heI4-theFeiR 13 .. y·~·file4·wlth). which proposed annexation is approved by the 14 legislative body of the city «te-hE-aRfteXe~.··SHeh-legislative·he8Yl 15 i.-·tHrftl-·8h.lll··hy--re8eIHtieft,--a~Yi8e)) or town from which the 16 territory wili be taken. may be submitted to the legislative body of 17 the city or town to whicb annexation is proposed «ef-the·reeei,t-ef 18 .Heh-pet i t ieft·aa4 -r~.est -_ ~he-Iatter-lei's" t iye-hetty-te-ift4ieate· -hr 19 rue'littell-whether· it-wi Il-aeee,t -the-,repese4·aftRexat. ieft, -a.4· if· se, 2Q ell' • ..... t··. tenls.· ·If -stleh· rese~.tlt ieR~ef -the-a .. RexiRI-ei ty-states -that 21 tt.·lellsl~tlye-~y.is-fayerahly-4i~pese~--tewaF4--slleh--aRRexa~ieR, 22 th,· -.Iea.s'at lye· -ltMy--af -the~e I ty-t~·.~e:a,u.ue~~~ha I ~. sll_i t· ~e-the 23 .etere-hi· stleh· terri tery-,r~,ese"· teo -he-.... ~exell, --. the~.-41¥est leR--ef 24 -'ether--sveh··territary-shall-he-aRfteze4-aR_-saeh·ether-,re,.sit'e~s 25 •• -are-4e~-a"reprla~e)). An annezation. under this. subsection 28 sball otherwise ,conform witb.the reqUirements for and procedures of a 27 petition and election method of annezina unincorporated territory 28 under chapter 35_13 RCW. ezcept for. the. requirement for the approval 29 of the annexation by the city or town from which the territory would -I -HB 1386 ; \ • Sec. I be taken. 2 (2) The legislative body of a city or town mayan its own 3 initiative by resolution indicate its desire to be annexed to a city 4 ~ either in whole or in part, or the legislative body of a city 5 or town proposing to annex all or part of another city or town may 6 initiate the annexation by adopt ins a resolution indicating that 7 desire. In case such resolution is passed, such resolution shall be 8 transmitted to the other affected city «te-whieh-it-4esires-te-~ 9 aftftexee;-."4-the-Ieaislatiye-he4y-ef-s~~h-eity--shall--hy--resel~tieR 10 iftdie.te--whether--it-will-ae~e,t-the-'Fe,esed-.RRe.atieRj-aa4-if-se, 11 eft-what-terms») or town. The annexation is effective if the other 12 city or town adopts a resolution concurring in the annexation, unless 13 the owners of property in the area proposed to be annexed, equal in 14 value to sixty percent or more of the assessed valuation of the 15 property in the area, protest the proposed annexation in writing to 16 the legislative body of the city or town proposins to annex the area, 17 within thirty days of the adoption of the second resolution accepting 18 tbe annexation. Notices of the public hearing at which tbe second 19 resolution is adopted shall be mailed to the owners of the property 20 within the area proposed to be annexed in the same manner that 21 notices of a hearing on a proposed local improvement district are 22 required to be mailed by a city or town as provided in chapter 35.43 23 ReW. An annexation under this subsection shall be potentially 24 subject to review by a boundary review board or other annexation 25 review board after the adoption of the initial resolution, and the 26 second resolution may not be adopted until the proposed annexation 27 has been approved by the board. 28 (3) «lft--the--eveftt--theFe--aFe--fte-~yalifie8-eleeteFs-FesidiRI 29 withia-a-,art-ef-a-eity-whieh-said-eity-wishes--te--have--aRRexed--ts 30 aftether-~efttilyeys-~itYi-theft-the-issye-sf-aftftexatieR-will-~e-deeieed 31 hy-the-legislative-hedy-ef-the-eity-fra.-whieh-the-territSFy-is-te-he 32 with4FaWft;---This--ee~isieRi--whi~h-Shall-he-hy-.. jeFity-vate-ef-said 33 leaislative-hedYi-shall-he-eeRsieeree-as-if-it--was--aft--eleetieft--hy 34 ~~lified--veteFs-ef-sai~-territery-afte-haR~led-aeesr~iftIIY-Hft~eF-the 35 ether-.ppli~ahle-se~tiefts-ef-this-eha'ter1 36 If-the-lelislative-hedy--ef--the--eity--te--whieh--aRftexatieft--is H8 1386 -2- Sec. 1 prepesed--iR~i~ates--a-willift&Ress-te-ae~ept-the-aftfte.atieftl-thea-the • 2 ~yestieft-ef-whether-sY~h-territery-shall-he-.ftaexe~-ts-syeh-eity--a •• 3 he~eee--a--part--theFeef--a.e--sY~h--ether-,repesitie.s-as-are-.e~e 4 a"re,riate-shall-he-sH~ittee-te-the-ele~ter8-i.-the-territery-te-he 5 aRfteaed-hy-the-lelislative-~y-ef-the-eity-er--,.rt--theree'--te--he 6 aftftexed--at-aft-eleetieft-whieh-sHeh-lelislative-he4y-shall-eaHs8-te-he 7 ~alled-fer-that-pyr,ese») Tbe owners of property located in a city or 8 town may petition for annexation to another city or town. An 9 annexation under this subsection shall confo~ with the require.ents 10 for and procedures of a direct petition aethod of annexing II unincorporated territory, except that the legislative body of tbe 12 city or town from which tbe territory would be taken .uS! approve tbe 13 annexation before it may proceed. .4 (4) All annexations under this section are SUbject to potential 15 review by the local boundary review board or annexation review board. -3-HB 1386 'Appropr iation: Revenue: Fiscal Note: FINAL BILL REPORT HB 1386 BY Representatives Hine, Jacobsen and Isaacson OO~@~UW~fID APR 111986 CITV OF TUKWII.A PLANNING DEPT. Modifying provisions relating to annexation by petition or election of all or part of one city or town by another city or town. House Committee on Local Government Senate Committee on Governmental Operations BACKGROUND: Existing law permits all or part of a city or town to annex all or part of another city or town. Approval of the voters residing in the area proposed to be annexed is required, unless no qualified electors reside there, in which case the governing body of the city or town from which the area is taken may authorize the annexation. Such an annexation may be initiated by petition of voters of the city from which the territory would be taken, or by resolution of governing bodies of both cities or towns. SUMMARY: The laws relating to the annexation of all or part of one city or town to another city or town are clarified. Under all methods, the governing body of both cities or towns must concur in the annexation. A petition of resident electors of the' area may initiate such an annexation, that is subject to voter approval at an election. A resolution of both governing bodies may initiate the annexation, which occurs unless the owners of sixty percent or more of the acreage in the area file protests against the annexation. A petition by the owners of a majority of the area can initiate an annexation, with no election. All annexations are potentially subject to boundary review board review and approval or rejection. VOTES ON FINAL PASSAGE: House 96 0 Senate 44' 1 Senate 34 10 (Senate amended) (Senate receded) BILL NO. HB 1386 PAGE 1 of ·' '. ...... .,., .! ". .-.~., .... i. ....... ' ,eo .. :. ,,' ~.l .' ..•. . ~::.' .. ' " , 'I.'t. . ... 1 HB 1386 5 Comm Amd AM08S 2 By Commi ttee on Governmental HB "::' . 3 operations, -1386' ........ / 4 Adopted on 2/28/86 voice ;1 S Vote 5 .; 6 On page 2. line 14, after "to" strike 2/28; .. ' 7 "s ixt:i" and insert "fort:z:" 1 :". . ...•. ~~ ,,' " ., .•... , " · City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (2061 433-1800 Gary l. vanDusen, Mayor Brice Martin, Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board Room W378, King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Notice of Intention "Northern" Portion Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. Martin: September 11, 1986 As required by the prOV1Slons of RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby given by the Cities of Tukwila and Renton to adjust their irregular mutual boundary and to exchange approximately· 53 acres of land lying generally between the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and 68th Avenue South and Treck Drive (Tukwila)/S.W. 29th Street (Renton). As the enclosed materials indicate,. the Notice of Intention refers to the northern portion of a 216-acre boundary adjustment between Renton and Tukwil a. The boundary adjustment/annexation action is bei ng sought under the authority of RCW 35.10.217. Thank you for forwarding this request for Boundary Review Board consideration. RF/sjn enclosure Sincerely, .lekC&z ~ Rebecca Fox Tukwila Planning Department ~ l\ RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION "Northern Portion" NOTICE OF INTENTION As required by RCW 36.43. a Notice of Intention is hereby given to the King County Boundary Review Board by the Cities of Renton and Tukwila. 1 •. Background Information The Cities of Renton and Tukwila ~ropos. to str~ghten the highly irregular common boundary between the two jurisdictions by adopting the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern right-of-way as the new boundary between the two cities. The adjusted corporate limits will resolve or substantially improve several problems which now exist due to the existing irregular border. The primary problems include the following. A. The Green River and several railroad tracks make access to a n·umber of properties very difficult for emergency (police· and. fire) vehicles. Rea 1 i gnment of the boundari es wi 11 result in better servi ce by both cities and also reduce response times. B. Utility (water and sewer) service and maintenance will be improved because the lines and mains· will be accessed more easily by the respon- sible city. . Chronology: The administrations of Renton and Tukwila have long recognized that the current joi nt boundary between the two ci ties is not necessari 1 y the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency servi ces to those areas of each city whi ch are cut off from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of- way. With the approval of both city council s. the admi ni strat ions of each city cooperatively explored the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15 and October 28. 1985. key staff from both cities met and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the imple- mentat i on of the proposed boundary adjustment. Both cit i es held a joi nt public meeting on January 30. 1986 for· area residents and property owners. On June 16. 1986. the City of Tukwila passed Resolution #1008 authorizing the simultaneous annexation/de-annexation actions by the Tukwila and Renton City Councils. Renton passed Resolution #2651 on July 7. 1986 which simi- 1 arly authori zes certai n property currently located withi n Renton to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property curre·nt 1 y l.ocated in Tukwil a. On August 11. 1986 repre- sentat i ves of both cit i es signed an i hterl oca 1 agreement regardi ng the annexations. . Structure of Application: The entire boundary adjustment affects a total of 215.66 acres in 56 parcels with a total assessed valuation of $17.257.845. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Northern Portion" Page 2 Since the area to be annexed/exchanged is large, it has been divided into two portions ("South" and "North") for purposes of Boundary Review Board consideration. Two separate applications ("South" and "North") are being submitted for review. Each application discusses land from Renton to be exchanged for land from Tukwila and land from Tukwila to be exchanged for 1 and from Renton. Thi s app 1 i cat i on ("Northern") addresses the territory located generally between the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and 68th Avenue South and Treck Drive (Tukwila)/S.W. 29th Street (Renton). It com- pri ses a total of 53 acres in 23 parce 1 s with an Cissessed val uat i on of $2,862,145. 15.28 acres will be ceded to Renton, while 37.87 acres will go to Tukwi 1 a. 2. Copies of Tukwila and Renton's respective resolutions accepting the-boundary adjustment proposals and the interlocal agreement between Renton and Tukwila are included as Attachments A through C. 3. A copy of the SEPA checklist with the Declaration of Non-significance at- tached is included as Attachment D. 4. The Cities of Tukwila and Renton are seeking annexation and de-annexation of the area subject to RCW 35.10.217 as amended during the 1986 regular session of the Washington State Legislature (HB 1386 -Inter-City Annexations). A copy of the appropriate chapter of the Code is included as Attachment E. 5. The 1 ega 1 de"scri pt i on of the area proposed to be annexed to Tukwil a is shown as Attachment F, and the 1 ega 1 descri pt i on of the area to be annexed to Tukwila is shown as Attachment G. 6. A map showing complete corporate entities and the annexation area is includ- ed as Attachment H. 7. A vicinity map is included as Attachment I. 8. Please refer to Attachment H above. 9. A. The annexation area population is very small, containing fewer than five single-family residences. The area of Tukwila to be given to Renton is zoned M-l for "light manufacturing". The Renton area to go to Tukwila is zoned B-1 for "Business Use", with a small portion zoned G-l for "General -Single Family". B. Existing land uses include commercial, agricultural (nursery), quarry, vacant, and a small amount of residential. It is expected that the commercial uses will remain in commercial use and that the residential uses will eventually convert to commercial or industrial use. 9. C. (1) The area 1 ies withi n the City of Tukwil a Comprehensi ve Land Use Policy Plan (adopted 09/19/77), and the City of Renton Comprehen- s i ve Pl an Compendi um (adopted 03/03/86). The Tukwi 1 a Comprehen- sive Plan shows lands to be received from Renton as "commercial" and "light industrial". Land to be given to Renton is shown as Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Northern Portion" Page 3 "light industrial". Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the area to be given to Tukwila as commercial and light industrial. The area to be received from Tukwila is not designated by Renton's comprehensive plan map. . (2) Neither Tukwila nor Renton has a franchise for the area. None is currently anticipated. ' (3) N/A. (4) N/A. (5) N/A. (6) The area currently in Tukwila is covered by Tukwila's Water Com- prehensive Plan (1982) and Tukwila's Sewer Comprehensive Plan (1982). The area currently is in Renton's Comprehensive Sewer Plan (1983) and Renton's Comprehensive Water Plan (1983). D. The topographi of the ent ire annexat i on area is generally fl at and follows the Green River Valley. E. The projected population is likely to be small or negative as the area deve lops for commerci aland/or manufacturi ng use. The proposal 1 i es within Census Tracts #262 and #259 which respectively had populations of 3,505 and 242 in the 1980 census. The estimated 1985 projections are 3,628 and 222 respectively (PSCOG). Future projections are not available. , The entire City of Tukwila had a 1980 population of 3,505, ·with a 1986 population estimate of 4,780. Total Tukwila employment was 20,930 in 1980 with a 1990 projection of 29,508 (PSCOG). The entire City of Renton had a 1980 population of 31,031 with a 1986 population estimate of 34,460. Total Renton employment was 39,935 in 1980 with a 1990 projection of 45,513 (Renton). F. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila would be responsible for the area's police and fire protection. Police protection would come from the Tukwila Pol i ce Department at 6200 South center Boulevard. Fire protection would be based in the Tukwila Fire Department at Fire Sta- tion #52 at 5900 South 147th with backup from the Tukwila Fire Station at 444 Andover Park East. Tukwi 1 a wou 1 d also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. Maintenance service would be provided from the City Shops at 600 Minkler Boulevard. No problems are anticipated in serving the area. . Upon annexation to Renton, Renton will be responsible for the annexed area's pol i ce and fi re protect i on. Pol i ce protect i on woul d come from the Renton Police Department at City Hall, 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Northern Portion" Page 4 Fire protection would be 211 Mill Avenue South Harri ngton. provided by Renton Fire Station #12 located at with backup from Station #11 at 9th and Renton would also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. Maintenance would be provided from Renton's maintenance complex at N.E. 2nd Street and Monroe N.E. Tukwila will continue to operate water service to the area. The north- ern portion of the annexation has fewer than 5 meters and could be picked up by Renton at a later date. The northern portion is not cur- rently served by sanitary sewer. G. The current location 'of Tukwila's community facilities include: 1) the Tukwi 1 a City Hall and Pol i ce Stat i on located approximately i mi le to the southwest; 2) the fire station located approximately 1 mile to the northeast; 3) the Tukwila Library located approximately 11 miles to the west; 4) the Tukwila Community Center located approximately i mile to the west. Various parks, including the Foster Golf Links are * to 3 mi les away. H. Renton's community facilities would serve the areas newly-annexed to Renton. These include Renton City Hall, Police Station and Library, each located approximately four miles from the annexation area. Fire Station #12 is located approximately three miles away with backup from Fire Sfation #11,21 miles away. King County's Fort Dent Park is with- in 1 mile of the annexation area. Other Renton parklands, schools and recreation facilities are located within i mile. 1. Municipal services are presently provided to the area by both Renton and Tukwila. Tukwila and Renton provide water and sewer to the area along West Valley Highway. Tukwila provides water and sewer to the small area just north of 1-405. Tukwila currently provides water service to the handful of meters off the Beacon Coal Mine Road. There is currently no sanitary sewer service to the area. Renton and Tukwil a provi de fi re, po 1 i ce and emergency protection to areas within their respective current boundaries. At the' time of annexation, fire police and emergency services would be assumed by the annexing jurisdiction. Tukwila will con- tinue to provide water service to the area annexing to Renton until such time as Renton develops its own capacity. Renton would assume responsibility for developing sewer service to the area. 2. The current and proposed development is consistent with the "urban" designation in King County's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Present costs of City of Tukwila and City of Renton services are descri bed below. The major percei ved impacts of the proposed boundary change to property owners would be in the area of prop- erty taxes. Listed in the table below are the individual levies of the various taxing,districts located i.n the affected code areas of the two cities. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application a. Property Taxes "Northern Portion" Page 5 .:..;TAc:.:X.:.:I-"NG=-.:Dc:.I;:..ST:..:;Rc:.I;:..CTo.:S'-___ CODE 2110 (Renton) CODE 2340 (Tukwil a) State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Services City of Renton City of Tukwil a School District No. 403 Hospital District No.1 TOTAL RATES (per $1,000) $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 2.24799 .27673 $11. 24534 $ 3.540]6 1.56652 .37785 .14372 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 $10.79573 Source: King County Department of Assessments The levies for each city are identical with the exception of the individual city tax levy figures. The result is that an average tax bill would cost the property owner approximately $0.40 more per $1,000 in Renton than it would in Tukwila. b. Water Rates City of Tukwila: Meter Size 3/4" 1" . 1 1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" Minimum Charge $ 6.80 10.80 15.30 19.80 37.80 50.80 92.80 140.80 The minimum .charge is for 500 cubic feet or less. For each 100 cubic feet in excess of the 500 cubic feet allowed for the mlO1mum charge, the rate shall be fifty cents per 100 cubic feet. · Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application City of Renton: Basic Service Charge: Meter Minimum Size Charge 3/4" $ 3;40 1" 4.70 1-1/2" 7.40 2" 12.20 3" 24.70 4" 42.65 6" 92.15 8" 162.70 10" 252.65 12" 362.10 Commodity Rates: o -2,500 2,500 -35,000 over 35,000 c. Sewer Rates City of Tukwila: "Northern Portion"· Page 6 $0.08 per 100 ft 3 0.82 per 100 ft 3 0.71 per 100 ft 3 (1) Residential Service: A flat rate of $5.20. per month for each single-family residence shall be charged. (2) Multiple and Industrial: The rate of $5.20 per month ·for the first dwelling unit and $4.70 for each addi- tional unit shall be charged. (3) Commercial and Industrial: A flat rate of $5.20·per 900 cubic feet or less of water usage shall be charged. The rate of sewage service on premises using more than 900 cubi c feet of water per month sha 11 be .52 cents per additional 100 cubic feet. (4) Penalty Charge:. .50 cents per month on sewer accounts more than 30 days in arrears. City· of Renton: Renton Ci ty Sewer. 1. Single family residence 2. All other users -$3.85 -$3.85 per 900 ft 3 H20 used .. " Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application '''Northern Port ion" Page 7 Metro Sewer 1. Single-family residence 2. All other. users -$8.50 -$8.50 per 900 ft3 H20 used The charges for sewer without City water shall be $12.35 per single-family residence which includes $8.50 Metro charge. The rates for' metered water service suppl ied to premi ses' outs i de the Renton City Limi ts shall be an' amount equal to one and five-tenths (1.5) times .. the rate fixed for water 'service supplied to users within the City. d. Metro Rates: The City/Metro charges as required by the Agreement for Sewage Di sposa 1 between the Muni ci pa 1 i ty of Metropolitan Seattle and the City'of Tukwila and the City of Renton is set at the sum of $8.50 per residential customer,' The Metro charge for other residential, customers is $8.50 for , each 900 cubic feet of water used. (1986 rates for METRO) e. Standby Char~es -Tukwila: The rate for fire protection lines (build,ng sprinkler systems) shall be deemed service charges and shall be, for anyone month or fractional part thereof, as follows: Size Service Charge 2" $ 6.00 3" 9,.00 etc, , .. f. Electricity: No change in rates would result from annexation since electrical energy is supplied to Rentbn and Tukwila by g. Puget Power at the same rate: . Utility Tax: Tukwila has no utility tax. Renton levies a 5% utility tax. 4. .No other currently const i tuted muni ci pa 1 entity is capab 1 e of providing subject services to the area. 5,. An' i nterl oca 1 agreement between Renton and, Tukwil a dated Aug- ust II, 1986 spells out areas of mutual concern and responsibility regarding future improvements and infrastructure responsibilities. (See Attachment C.) It also stipulates that Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the part ies cons i stent with the new boundary 1 i nes. Annexat i on itself is likely to have little or no impact on the area's devel- opment and its subsequent need for services. Annexation wi 11 improve the availability and cost of providing emergency services for citizens in both jurisdictions. , •• (t. '" Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application ~INorthern Port ion" Page 8 6. The proposal may increase the level of service for the new annex- ation areas due to the increased proximity of service facilities. 7. The annexation will have little, if any, impact on jurisdictions other than Renton and Tukwil a. I. If the adjustment is approved, Renton will cede to Tukwila 37.87 acres in 16 parcels' for a total assessed valuation of $2,677,200. Tukwila will cede to Renton 15.28 acres in 7 parcels for a total assessed valu- ation of $184,945. Renton will realize at . .least a temporary net loss of $2,492,255. Notwithstanding the net loss of assessed valuation to Renton, the annexations will have an overall positive impact on Renton and Tukwila. There will be little, if any, impact on other government, economic or social interests. J. The proposal supports the stated object i ves of the Boundary Revi ew Board in the following ways: RCW 36.93 .180( 3): The proposal extends 1 ogi ca 1 servi ces areas based on proximity to basic municipal services. RCW 36.93.180(4): The proposal extends logical service areas based on prevent i on of .abnorma lly i rregul ar boundari es. RCW 36.93.180(7): The proposal helps adjust an impractical boundary. ~ "', ) .', ',-"i,' .' . " ' " :'j '. ,:,;t Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Annexation-Oeannexation Procedures Apri I 17, 1986 1. The Renton City Council and the Tukwila City Council adopt resolutions indicating a desire for certain areas of each City to be annexed by the other. (RCW 35.10.217(2» 2. Receive Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval. The BRB may hold its own independent public hearing. 3. A. public hearing on the proposed annexation must be held by the annexing City Council. Thus, both Renton and Tukwila must hold a pub Ii c heari ng on the proposed annex at i on act ions f or the property owners in their respective annexation areas. Notice of a publ ic hearing at which an annexing resolution is to be adopted shall be mailed to the owners of the property within the area proposed to be annexed in the same manner that notices of hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by a City as provided in RCW 35.43: Notice of the hearing upon a resolution declaring the intention of the legislative authority of a city or town to order an annexation shall be given by mail at least fifteen days before the day fixed for hearing to the owners or reputed owners of all lots, tracts, and parcels of I and or other property to be inc I uded in the annexation, as shown on the rolls of the county assessor, directed to the address thereon shown. ___ . 4. Adoption of an annexing resolution will start a thirty day protest period. If the owners of property in the annexation area equal in value toA~ percent or more of the total property value in the annexation area protest the annexation in writing to the annexing City Council within this thirty day period; then the annexation shall be /~ 1. ____ -- restrained. (RCW 35.10.217(2» . 5. If no or insufficient protest is received from property owners in the annexation area; then the annexation shall automatically become effec- tive at the end of the thirty day period. (RCW 35.10.217(2» Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner 4/17 /86 i , '. ATTACHMENT 6) CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 100 .? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THE CITY' OF RENTON TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, SPECIFYING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH RENTON ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1002 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current bcundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of ene respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHERE~S, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective Cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detail, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPAl a Determination of Non-Significance for a prooosed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON HEREBY RESULVE AS FOLLOWS: -1- A , \ Section 1. The above recitals are found to be true and correct. Section 2. The City of Tukwila hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Renton according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW 35.10.217. Section 3. The City of Tukwila is willing to and intends to annex certain areas currently located in the City of Renton and described as follows, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Renton. Section 4. The City of Tukwila formally requests that the City of Renton annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Tukwila and described as follows, to wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the ceding of such territory to the City. of Renton by the City of Tukwila .• Section 5. The City of Tukwila recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Tukwila intends to pursue the resolution of these issues by entering into an agreement wi'th the City of Renton containing the following terms and conditions: 1. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shar·ed egui tably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% f~deral funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwi la agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each City's share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. - 2 - 2. S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority i tern on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be ~ocated entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the 'annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. p-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibi t B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-I Channel which will .be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-I Channel. 4. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley ROad (SR-181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 6. Utili ties. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the.area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas. solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -405. The Ci ty of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 8 . review of consistent hereto and in full. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate future annexation petitions received by the parties with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth - 3 - , , Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entitled "Inter10ca1 Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations" containing the terms and conditions outlined in Section 5 above. Section 7. Resolution No. 1002 of' the City of Tukwila, passed by the City Council on April 21, 1986 is hereby repealed. PASSEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this i6ttr day of ~ 3' , 1986. APPROVED: ~U,l~'~ClL PRESIDENT ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ~r'~~duc~ L~-rr ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OfFICE F THE CITY ATTO C. FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. I~Of? -4- , \ EXHI BIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23 Rae. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 I TOTAL PARCEL 27 (portion) 63 32 28 7 MOC 38 8 MOC (p) 9 MOC (p) 43 50 51 23 6 24 (portion) 21 MOC 22 (oortion) 21 59 20 33 17 23 (portion) 24 (portion) 22 97 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 39 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 45 parcels ACREAGE 3.62 12.79 2.35 0.27 3.85 4.55 1.84 0.91 2.91 1.14 3.05 2.15 0.84 0.72 2.16 6.70 2.16 44.10 2.45 2.16 10.47 1.61 .0.37 2.14 3.69 5.93 3.01 10.43 5.44 44.10 3.01 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 I 5.54 3.09 101. 65 , \ EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 4 23.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11. 79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot #2 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 1-. F re 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Hap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton =--:. Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila " 1000' , , EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions 1 I. ----~ - . , \, i -, •• ATT ACHMENT B CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _2_65_1 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. -ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON. ANO REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. SPECIFYING THE TERMS ANO CONOITIONS~' -,' i.¥.-• OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING TI::tE MAYOR . ANO CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT .. WITH TUKWILA ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS ANO CONOITIONS . .,,,,,,. WHEREAS. the current location of the common corporati"boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila Is Irregular and does not follow an easily Identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the current boundary 18 difficult for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current Irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective Jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be In the mutual Interest of Renton and Tukwila. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas. ~!.: including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern In detail. and WHEREAS. the City of Renton. acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA. a Determination of Non-Significance for a proposed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW lS.1 0.217. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth In RCW l5.IO.217. SECTlO~J 1II: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: , '. RESOLUTION· NO. _2_6_5_1 __ See E)(hlblt • A· attached hereto and made a part hereof as If fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR-l81) and the Burllngton Northern railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwlla by the City of Renton. SECTION IV: The City of Renton Is wllling to and Intends to anne)( certain areas currently located In the City of Tukwila and described as follows, to-wit: See E)(hlblt -B-attached hereto and made a part hereof as If fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burllngton Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwlla. SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain Issues of concem to both ttie City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually .resolved. The City of Renton Intends to pursue the resolution of these Issues by entering Into an agreement with the City of Tukwlla containing the following terms and condltlons: I. Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander BoulevardlS.W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement,. both SlUes agree to deSignate the aforementioned Improvement of Strander BoulevardlS,W •. 27fh Street. as a high priority Item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80'" federal funding; for this road Improvement project. . Bacause the timing of this street e)(tension Is uncertain, Renton and Tukwlla agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both Jurisdictions wlll cooperate to Insure that 'an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing wlll be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the anne)(ation, the final decision as to the time for Improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwlla. If federal funding Is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each City's share of the local costs of the Improvement shall be so"'. 2. s.w. 43rd StreeVS. 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd and the railroad tracks Is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two CIties shall support the S.W. 43rd StreeVS. l80th Street Improvement In the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street rallroad crossing. By support, it Is meant that both Cities will designate this road Improvement as a high priority Item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road Improvement project. If federal funding Is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwlla will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road Improvement shall be sa'll>. Because the Improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel Is a storm drainage Improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-I Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel. -2-. , ' , " \ l , RESOLUTION NO. 2651 ----- 4. Green River Olke Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Olke Maintenance Plan was 22'" prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Olkes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton wlll not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehab1l1tation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. 43rd StreeVS. 180th Street wlll be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responslb1l1ty for maintenance and operation of the traffic Signals at the Intersection of S.W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-18I), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed In total by the City of Kent. 6. Ut1l1t1es. Both parties understand that Renton has existing ut1l1ties serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S.W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing ut1l1ties and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for provldlng sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall Impose a surcharge upon ut1l1ty users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-181. The City of Renton should enter Into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for Improvements to SR-181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responslb1l1ty for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 8. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila wlll coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary llne shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference as If set forth In full. SECTION VI: The Mayor Is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entitited -Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations-containing the terms and conditions outllned In Section 5 above. PASSED BV THE CITY COUNCIL this _",-7",th,,--_ day of -->J~u:=.lyZ-. ___ _ 1986. ~e«9J~~~ Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BV THE MAVOR this 7th day of July 1986. ~~~'~Pc.~ Barbara V. Shlnpch;MaYOr Approved as to form: ~aA~".wI~~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney -3- , , \ RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT A LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FRDM RENTON The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown In Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOe 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOe (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOe (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MDt 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 5.54 36 3.09 TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 , , , i, i RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT B LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are .listed below and shown In Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE - NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 '41 --(1~.05 \~ NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 ~ 2'.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 (@ \ 16.0) ) SE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 ~ '40-;2~ SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 . 0160 (portion) /l.~ 0145 .2~ 0155 (portion) 1.2~ 0150 1.4~ 0'20 I .28 } 0"0 .02 . Lot 112 1\ .12 y l0,28 TOTAL 11 parcels "U4-:1ll · . ; RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of ~ll Future Annexation P,titions -- .,., . - .. ' \, .gure 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2651 Renton-Tukwll. Boundtry AdJuStlent Mtp Of Affected Artu to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila N o 1000' , I A & C P'.E # a f,-6S-~ DATE ¢ / 14 ATTACHMENT C INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING ~CIP~A~X~ THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila", and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and ' WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 ,which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. ~,~/ ,which calls for certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit B to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement Shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. 3. S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So IBOth Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an BO% federal funding for this road improvement project. , If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time.for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P-l Channel. The P-l Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd.Street/S. IBOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and· future widening for the bridge •.. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBll, formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. B. SR-IBl. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-IBl between S. W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. , , ) Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 10. Entire Agreement. Thi s Agreement constitutes the ent ire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. OATEO thi s //~day of Ot{!'C' at, 1986. CITY OF RENTON ~lo/.c~~4;oc~~(Ju APPROVED AS TO FORM: 5lY ATTORNEY d\:;;:-~~I~~ ~ LAW N J. WI( N, A RN Y , , EXHI BIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23 Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.'§ SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOC .' 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.4' SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (port i on) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 , 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 I 34 5.54 36 3.09 I TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 \ -. F' 're 1 Renton-Tukwil .. Boundary Adjustment Hap of Affected Areas Lands to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila t, 1000' Q • I .' EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 42 16.03 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 -.02 Lot #2 .12 TOTAL 11 Darcel s 114.01 \ -, F' Ire 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas to Renton * to Tukwfla Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila " .. ! EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions I I .. 1I1-·-~If-----:.-------.,:, 'i;a'5'EP.E:~4. .,. r •• '. . . :~:'''dn ... ;:~:.: " - .. . ,; , ATT ACHMENT 0 1147N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINA TlON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF -038-86 APPLICA TlON NO(s).: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: PROPONENT: LOCA TlON OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Application for a proposed adjustment of the common boundary line between Renton and Tukwila In order to more logically provide services to the citizens of both communities. City of Renton Polley Department/City of Tukwila Development Property located In the southwest quadrant of the City generally following the easterly rIQht-of-way line of the BN railroad tracks. City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that It does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under" RCW 43.2IC.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other Information on file with the lead agency. This Information Is available to the public on request. T here Is no comment period for this DNS. Resporislble Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than June 16. 1986. . . You should be prepared to make specific factual obJections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: MaY·28. 1986 PUBLICA nON DATE: June 2. 1986 A~d. t/"~ R aid G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director , " reF: I0.38-A& City of Renton LU: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) must be--prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist Is to provide Information to help you and the agency Identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid Impacts from the proposal. If It can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise Information known. or give the best description you can. . You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most .cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or If a question does not apply to your proposal. write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline. and landmark designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems. the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even If you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any ,additional information that will help describe your proposal' or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining If there may be significant adverse Impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions Involving decisions on policies. plans and programs). the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. A. l. 2. 3. BACKGROUNO Name of proposed project. If applicable: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Name of applicant: _ Ci ty of Tukwila City of Renton Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Policy Development Department (206) 235-2552 200 Mill Ave. S. Steve Munson Renton, WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton -Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing. if applicable): The projected completion date of this proposal is 10/1/86. ~, · " 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. However, future annexations and development proposals in the area will eventually be reviewed by staff of both communities. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ECF-108-85 (Checklist prepared for areawide rezoning of Green River Valley) ECF~004-84 (Checklist prepared for Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan update of 1984) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending forgovemmental approvais of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. The City of Renton is presently considering an areawide rezone application of the Green River Valley. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1) Adoption of Resolutions -Renton and Tukwila 2) Proposal Approval -King County Boundary Review Board 3) Public Hearing on annexing resolution -Renton and Tukwila i1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The City of Renton and the City of Tukwila are considering adjusting the common boundary line between the two communities. Renton would gain ±114 acres in 11 parcels from Tukwila while Tukwila would receive ±10l acres in 45 parcels from Renton. This measure is proposed in order to: 1) Provide more logical service areas including emergency response areas. 2) Clarify land use planning responsibilities. 3) Provide more logical mailing addresses. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject proposal is located generally in the southwest quadrant of the City of Renton. The proposed r'ealignment would follow the easterly right- of-way line of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks from S.W. 43rd Street (5. l80th Street) on the south to the Green River crossing of Interstate 5 on the north. B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS I. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): I'f'ia't:\ rolllng, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . ':.:::;;I b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 15\-20\ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay, muck, peat d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Some evidence of instability in the past is present on some proper- ties. However, significant amounts of fill in recent years have substantially reduced this instability. -2- • 't' . " e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of ·any .filllng or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N.A. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. . N.A. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N.A. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, If any: N.A. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e .. dust, automobile, odors, Industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If any, generally describe and give approx~mate quantities If known. N.A. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. 1) N.A. Surface: Is there any surface water body on or In the Immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams. saltwater. lakes, ponds. wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows Into. Yes. 1) Green River 2) Springbrook Creek -flows into Green River 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None in this application. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N.A. -3- , ~" . '. 4) Wlll the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities If known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a IOO-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Several portions of the subject proposal lie within the lOO-year floodplain, particularly along the Green River. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities If known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .: agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N.A. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, If any (include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow? Wlll this water flow Into other waters? If so, describe. N.A. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N.A. -4- • . .. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground. and runOff water impacts. If any: N.A. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of ve etation found on the site: o deciduous tree' alder ap e. aspen. other o evergreen tree: • e a pine. other o~ o~ o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup. bullrush. skunk cabbage. other o water plants: water lily. eel grass. milfoil. other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N.A. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No species are known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping. use of nat! ve plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: N.A. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: <8aw~heron. eagle.@ngbl~ other --::--7':'"------ Mammals: eer. be€oeg. beaver. other -:--,:::S::::ma:::;l:.:l~ ____ _ Fish: bass. ~ ut. herring. shellfish. other ________ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. The site is within the Pacific flyway. -5- , " , " L d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, If any: N.A. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether It will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N.A. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N.A. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N.A. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None as a result of this proposal. I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any: N.A. b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N.A. -6- .. ' • '1 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N.A. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: N.A. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What Is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current uses of the subject properties include residential office, storage and warehousing, sewage treatment facilities, a rock quarry, meat rendering plant, and some light industrial activities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Some properties were used in the past for agricultural purposes but none are currently. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures include housing units, offices, warehouses, and utilities. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N.A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. g. h. Both cities have several zoning categories in the subject area. What Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? There are a number of Comprehensive Plan land use designations in the subject area for each communit¥. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Some portions 'along the Green River (near S.W. 43rd Street and north of Longacres at I-405) are designated "Urban" in the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program (1983). Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Several strips on both sides of the proposed boundary line south of I-405 and north of S.W. 43rd Street in Renton are designated "Green- belt." This includes some limitations on development. N.A. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N.A. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N.A. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: N.A. -7- , " I, Prop0ged measures to ensure the proposal 19 compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: 9. Housing The review and consideration of the staffs and legislative bodies of both cities has taken into account all existing and projected land uses and plans. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, If any? Indicate whether high, middle. or low-income housing. N.A. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-Income housing. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: N.A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not Including antennas: what Is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N.A. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: N.A. I I. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would It mainly occur? N.A. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N.A. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N.A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N.A. -8- .. ' .' . , I 12, Recreation a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are In the Immediate vicinity? There are some facilities provided by private enterprises for their employees and some public exercise facilities. Fort Dent Park (a King County facility) is located near the north central portion of this study area as is the Foster Golf Course. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N.A. I :5. HIstoric and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N.A. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The major public highways servicing the subject area include 1-405, 1-5, and SR 181. Some arterials of both communities are also located here. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit has a number of routes traversing the area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N.A. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 1) Both communities will either assume or share responsibility for the following public improvements: a) Future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks. b) Grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the railroad tracks (if undertaken). c) Maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. 2) The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Wash- ington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR 181 between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. -9- . " . .. • , e. WUl the project use (or occur in the Immediate vicinity of) w!lter. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. N.A. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. N.A. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: See #l4(d) above. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. No. Responsibilities for specific services will just be exchanged between the two cities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. If any. See below. 16. Utilities a. 9a9 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. See #lS(b) above. C. SIGNA TURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any wUlful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner lS.b. Those services most directly affected will be utilities. The City of Renton (through an inter local agreement) should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-40S when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. -10- #176 11-8-84 ," " , . . D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FDR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions Involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general. It may be helpful to read them In conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions. be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the Item at a greater Intensity or at a faster rate than If the proposal were not Implemented. Respond briefly and In general terms. I. How' would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water: emissions to air: production, storage. or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances: or production of noise? This depends upon the specific proposals for individual properties in the conununities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such Increases are: N.A. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants. animals. fish. or marine life? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals. fish. or marine life are: N.A. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N.A. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection: such as parks. wilderness. wild and scenic rivers. threatened or endangered species habitat. historic or cultural sites. wetlands. floodplains. or prime farmlands? It may serve to indirectly improve the water quality of the Green River and give some integrity to the Greenbelt designations of those areas straddling the proposed boundary line. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce Impacts are: Several inter local agreements regarding utilities and road improvements may'help reduce some otherwise adverse 'impacts. -II - t, ,. . " 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shorellne use. Including whether It would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? It should serve to discourage or disallow such incompatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use Impacts are: The inter local agreements mentioned in 4 (above) will likely reduce these impacts. . 6. How would the proposal be likely to Increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N.A. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N.A. 7. Identify. If possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the Elnvlronment. Based upon the efforts put together so far, no such conflicts are foreseen. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information Is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might Issue in rellance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson -12- '~I~ .. ----------------------------~ ' .•.. ,. A TT ACHMENT E COIISOlidadoD And Annexation 35.10.360 Chapter 35.04 INCORPORATION OF INTERCOUNTY AREAS Sections )l.04.010 )l.04·ISO )l.04·I60 )l.04·170 )5.04 .180 )5.04 .190 .hrough 35.04.100 Repealed. Recodified as RCW 35.02.230. Recodified as RCW 35.02.200. Recodified as RCW 35.02.250. Repealed. Decodified. 35.04.010 througb 35.04.140 Repealed. See Supple. mentary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. 35.04.150 Recodified as RCW 35.01.130. See Sup- plement~ry Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec· tions. thIS volume. 35.04.160 Recodified as RCW 35.01.140. See Sup- plement~ry Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec· tions, thiS volume. 35.04.170 Recodified as RCW 35.01.150. See Sup- plementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec· tions. this volume. 35.04.180 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. 35.04.190 Decodlfied. See Suppjementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. Chapter 35.10 CONSOLIDATION AND ANNEXATION OF CITIES AND TOWNS Seclions H.l0.217 IllOI60 11.10165 lUO.l70 l!.\O.lIO '110l20 :~ 10.5)0 Methods for annexation. Anneulian-Tran.fer of fire department employees. Annexation-Transfer of fire department employ· ees.-RiShts and benefits. Annexation-Transfer of firc department employ- e .. -Notice-Time limitation. Consolidation-Transfer of firc department employ- .... (Errective July I. 1987.) Consolidation-Transfer of nrc department employ- .es-Rilhts and benefits. (Effective July 1. 1981.) Consolidation-Transfer of fire department employ· ... -Notice-Time limitation. (Effective July 1. 1987.) ]5.10.217 Methods' for annexation. The following ,<thods are available for the annexation of all or a part .>1, city or town to another city or town: .111 A petition for an election to vote upon the annex· ilIOn. which proposed annexation is approved by the ·.'IISI.tive body of the city or town from which the terri· .ory Will be taken. may be submitted to the legislative lady or the city or town to which annexation is pro- :>J\cd. An annexation under this subsection shall other· '; .. conrorm with the requirements for and procedures ~ , petition and election method of annexing unincor· r,ted territory under chapter 35.13 RCW. except for the requirement for the approval of the annexation by the city or town from which the territory would be taken. (2) The legislative body of a city or town may on its own initiative by resolution indicate its desire to be an· nexed to a city or town either in whole or in part. or the legislative body of a city or town proposing to annex all or part of another city or town may initiate the annex· ation by adopting a resolution indicating that desire. In case such resolution· is passed. such resolution shall be transmitted to the other affected city or town. The an· nexation is effective if the other city or town adopts a resolution concurring in the annexation. unless the own· ers of property in the area. proposed to be annexed. equal in value to sixty percent or more of the assessed valua· tion of the property in the area. protest the proposed an· nexation in writing to the legislative body of the city or town proposing to annex the area. within thirty days of the adoption of the second resolution accepting the an· nexation. Notices of the public hearing at which the second resolution is adopted shall be mailed to the own· ers of the property within the area proposed to be an· nexed in the same manner that notices of a hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by a city or town as provided in chapter 35.43 RCW. An annexation under this subsection shall be po. tentially subject to review by a boundary review board or other annexation review board after the adoption of the initial resolution. and the second resolution may not be adopted until the proposed annexation has been ap- proved by the board. (3) The owners of property located in a city or town may petition for annexation to another city or town. An annexation under this subsection shall conform with the requirements for and procedures of a direct petition method of annexing unincorporated territory. except that the legislative body of the city or town from which the territory would be taken must approve the annexaiion before it may proceed. . (4) All annexations under this section-'s;:' subject to potential review by the local boundary review board or annexation review board. [1986 c 253 § I; 1985 c 281 § 15; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 4.] 35.10.360 Annexatlon--Transfer of fire depart- ment employees. Upon the annexation of two or more cities or code cities. any employee of the lire department of the former city or cities who (I) was at the time of annexation employed exclusively or principally in per· forming the powers. duties. and functions which are to be performed by the lire department of the annexed city or code city. as the case may be. (2) will. as a direct consequence of annexation. be separated from the em· ploy of the former city. code city or town. and (3) can perform the duties and meet the minimum requirements of the position to be Ii lied. then such employee may transfer employment to the lire department of the an· nexin8 city. as provided in this section and RCW 35.10.365 and 35.10.370. (1986 RCW Sa_ .. 1511 t , , I 1 J r • I. · . ~ ATTACHMENT F LANDS TO TUKWILA ("NORTHERN") That portion or Sections 24 and 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Westerly Right-of-way Line of Monster Road S.W. (Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1, Established 5-25-31, -County Road No.8) said Right-of-Way being 60 feet in width (30 feet each side of centerline) with the Northerly Right-or-Way Line of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line in Southwest 114 of the Northwest ·114 of Section 24; Thence Northwesterly along said railroad Right-or-Way Line, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as aanexed by Ordinance NO. 1764 (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) a distance or 280 reet more or less to a point which is perpendicular to and Easterly or the existing Northeasterly line /" of the Tukwila City Limits as annexed under Ordinance N~ 252; Thence Southwesterly along said perpendicular line and said Renton City limits line to t~e Southwesterly Right-of-Way Line of the former Northern Pacific Railway and the True Point of Beginning; Thence Southeasterly along said southwesterly railroad right-of-way line and said city limits line to an intersection with the easterly extension of that portion of the trrread of the Green River, which bears generally westerly and which point is also 1900 feet more or less south and 850 feet more or less ~ east of the northwest corner of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M. ; Thence westerly along said extension 100 feet more or less to the thread of said Green River; Thence Southeasterly along said existing limits of the City of Renton to the Southwesterly Right-or-Way Line of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; Page 1 of J 1.7..H.6 7/29/86 • • L Thence Southerly along said Westerly Right-of-Way Line to the North Right- of-Way Line of Nelson Pl. (Charles Monster Road No.2); Thence westerly and Southerly along said city limits line and the northerly and westerly right of way line of Nelson Place produced south to the south right-of-way line of South 153rd Street; Thence Easterly along said Southerly Right-of-Way Line and existing limits of the City of Renton to an intersection with the Northerly Right of Way line of Primary state Highway No. 1 (SR 405) Thence Northeasterly along said right of way line and said city limits line to the Westerly Right-of-way Line of the former Northern Pacific Railroad (SNI, Puget Sound Shore RR) a distance of 525 feet more or less; Thence Southerly along said Westerly Right-of-Way Line and said city limits line to its intersection with the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25; : Thence continuing Southerly along said Westerly line and said city limits line to a point on a line 410 feet more or less North of the South line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim; Thence West along" said line and said city limits line to an intersection with the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of State Road 181 (West Valley Highway, S.S.H. SM); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line and said city limits line to an intersection with the North line of the South 990 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 25; Thence East along said North line and said c~ty limits line to an intersection with the Eest line of the former' Northern Pacific Railroad Right of Way; Page 2 of 3 L2.H.6 7/29/86 • • -, t· Thence North along said line to its intersection with the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24; Thence continuing North and Northwesterly along said Easterly Right-or-Way Line to an intersection with South line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24; Thence continuing Northwesterly along said Easterly Right of Way line to an intersection with a line which is perpendicular to and easterly pr the existing easterly City Limits Line of Tukwila as annexed under Ordinance No. 252; Thence Southwesterly along said perpendicular line to the Southwesterly Right-of-Way Line of the former Northern Pacific Railway and the True Point of Beginning. Page ) of J L2.H.6 7/29/86 .1 • , , ATTACHMENT LANDS TO RENTON ("NORTHERN") FOSTER GOLF COURSE TO BLACK RIVER PARCEL A parcel of land currently in the City of Tukwila lying within a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, T23N, R4E, W.M. and in the southeast 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M., dlsc within that portion of Junction Addition to Seattle in Volume 12 of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington and described more particularly as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way as recorded respect- ively in Volume 821, page 263, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 830, page 305 of Deeds, records of King County, and the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (Also known as S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman"s Seattle Garden Tracts vacated under Tukwila Ordinance 101; thence easterly along said extension to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing easterly along said extension 500 feet more or less to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Also known as Steel Hill Road) as shown on said Junction Addition to Seattle; thence sOLlthe~-I.st~r 1 y along road center-l i ne 250 feet mOl""e or 1 ess to the centerline of 68th Avenue South (Also known as Steel Hill Road, County Rd.No. 8, and Monster Road); thence southeasterly along said cent~rline 1470 feet mare or less to the thread of the Black River; thence westerly along said thread to the northeasterly margin of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad right--of-way margin; thence northwesterly alorlg said north- ea5terly margin 500 feet more or less to its intersection with the southwesterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad); thence along a line at right angles to said southwesterly margin a distance of 100 feet to the northeasterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly F'acific Coast Railroad); thence northwesterly along said northeasterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. G -1-: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas A1T ACHMENT I to Rerrton "NORTHERN" PORTION :;.:. Lands to TUKwil a Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila o 2000· ATT ACHMENT A ED CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. /00 g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THE CITY OF RENTON TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, SPECIFYING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH RENTON ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1002 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the current location of the common corporate boundary between the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila is irregular and does not follow an easily identified natural feature, and WHEREAS, the current boundary is difficult for residents, businesses, and public officials to recognize and use, and WHEREAS, the current irregular boundary limits the ability of . • ne respective jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas, and WHEREAS, realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be in the mutual interest of Renton and Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a realigned boundary would provide more logical service areas, including emergency service response areas, and WHERE~S, a realigned boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical mailing addresses, and WHEREAS, staff members of the respective Cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern in detai I, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA, a Determination of Non-Significance for a pro Dosed realignment of boundaries between the two Cities to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW 35.10.217, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: -1- '-~~ , Section 1. The above recitals are found to be true and correct. Section 2. The City of Tukwila hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Renton according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW 35.10.217. Section 3. The City of Tukwila is willing to and intends to annex certain areas currently located in the Ci ty of Renton and described as follows, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the cedin~-df iuch territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Renton. Section 4. The City of Tukwila formally requests that the City of Renton annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Tukwila and described as follows, to wit: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. upon the cectir't"g of such terri tory to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwila. Section 5. The City of Tukwila recognizes that there are certain issues of concern to both the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The. Ci ty of Tukwila intends to pursue the resolution of these issues by entering into an agreement with the City of Renton containing the following terms and conditions: 1. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwi la agree to moni tor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each City's share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. - 2 - I l, a'!. ' 2. S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street improvement in the same manner as' the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to ~atch an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. . If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement wi~l-be~ located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the' "annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-I Channel which will ,be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-I Channel. 4. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 5. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 6. Utili ties. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the,area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -4 0 5. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 8. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. - 3 - "s' Section 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain agreement entitled "Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations" containing the terms and conditions outlined in Section 5 above. Section 7. Resolution No. 1002 of' the City of Tukwila, passed by the City Council on April 21, 1986 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this d/IJ day of ~ , 1986. C/ APPROVED: ~~,l~'~ClL PRESIDENT ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ~~ __ ~h~ L Ri, Xtr ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OfFICE F THE CITY ATTO l. FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITOy COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. /00£ -4- ,,£ ' ,', . EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24 Twn. 23-'c Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 PARCEL 27 (portion) 63 32 2B 7 MOC 38 8 MOC (p) 9 MOC (p) 43 50 51 23 6 24 (portion) 21 MOC 22 (portion) 21 59 20 33 17 23 (portion) 24 (portion) 22 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 I TOTAL 57 62 61 11 43 37 38 Q, 39 , 53 14 13 29 10 9 59 8 1.7 35 34 36 45 parcels ACREAGE 3.62 12.79 2.35 0.27 3.85 4.55 1.84 0.91 2.91 1.14 3.05 2.15 0.84 0.72 2.16 6.70 2.16 44.10 2.45 2.16 10.47 1.61 0.37 2.14 3.69 5.93 3.01 10.43 5.44 44.10 3.01 3.00 8.69 6.40 0.17 6.83 0.10 0.17 . 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.14 0.19 . 0.15 0.17 0.12 2.84 5.54 3.09 101.65 ",~ . ,', . EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 4 23.44 . SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 42 16.03 SE 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 23. Rge. 4 0160 (port i on) 11. 79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot #2 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 1-. F re 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton * Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila ,', . EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions A TT ACHMENT B CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _26_5_1 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON. AND REQUESTING THE CITY OF TUKWILA TO ANNEX CERTAIN AREAS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON. SPECIFYING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS" OF SUCH ANNEXATIONS AUTHORIZING ,THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH TUKWILA ACCORDING TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS - WHEREAS. the currant location of the common corPOrat~"boundary bet~en the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila Is Irregular and does not follow an easily Identified natural feature. and WHEREAS. the currant boundary Is difflcuit for residents. businesses. and public officials to recognize and use. and WHEREAS. the current Irregular boundary limits the ability of the respective Jurisdictions to plan for future land use and logical service areas. and WHEREAS. realigning and simplifying the common boundary would be In the mutual Interest of Renton and Tukwila. and .. ,.- WHEREAS. a realigned boundary would provide "'more logical service areas • . , ~ . Including emergency service response areas. and WHEREAS. a realigned .. boundary would clarify land use planning responsibilities and provide more logical malling addresses. and WHEREAS. staff members of the respective cities have explored the potential areas of fiscal and administrative concern In detail. and WHEREAS. the City of Renton. acting as lead agency for purposes of SEPA. a Determination of Non-Significance for a proposed realignment of boundaries between the two CIties to be accomplished by reciprocal annexations pursuant to RCW :55.10.217. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON. DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The City of Renton hereby establishes intent to realign and simplify its common boundary with the City of Tukwila according to the reciprocal annexation method set forth in RCW :55.10.217. SECTION 11/: The City of Renton formally requests that the City of Tukwila annex certain areas currently within the limits of the City of Renton and described as follows. to-wit: "! . RESOLUTION· NO. _2_6_51 __ See Exhibit -A-attached hereto and made a part hereof as If fully set forth. (Property located generally between the West Valley Highway (SR-181) and the Burlington Northem railroad tracks and between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405.) . upon the ceding of such territory to the City of Tukwila by the City of Renton. SECTION IV: The City of Renton Is willing to and Intends to .annex certain areas currently located In the City of Tukwila and described as follows. to-wit: See Exhibit -B-attached hereto and made a part hereof as If fully set forth. (Property located generally between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and south of Longacres racetrack.) upon the ceding of such territorY to the City of Renton by the City of Tukwila. SECTION V: The City of Renton recognizes that there are certain Issues of concem to both ttie City of Renton and the City of Tukwila that must be mutually resolved. The City of Renton Intends to pursue the resolution of these Issues by entering Into an agreement with the City of Tukwila containing the following terms and condltlons: I. Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future croSSing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street shOuld be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreeme~t.both Gltles agree to deSignate the aforementloned"dmprovement of Strander BoulevardlS,W.27.th Street. as a high priority item on each Clty's Transportation Improvement Plan. and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80... federal funding .. for this road Improvement project. ;, ' Because the timing of this street extension Is uncertain. Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and. as development warrants. to acknowledge that the route Is needed and that both Jurisdictions wlll cooperate to Insure that an appropriate connection Is designed and constructed. Because the crossing wlll be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for Improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding Is unavallable. then Renton and Tukwlla will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each Clty's share of the local costs of the Improvement shall be SO .... 2. S.W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated croSSing of S.W. 43rd and the railroad tracks. Is undertaken to Improve traffic safety and capacity. the local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S.W. 43rd Street/So l80th Street. Improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street rallroad crossing. By support. it is meant that both CIties will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Clty's Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half . of the local funds needed to match an 80... federal funding for this road Improvement project. If fcder::l funding is unavailable. then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary. such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be SO.... Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation. the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 3. P-I Channel. The P-I Channel is a storm drainage Improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-I Channel. -2- ", . • 'l • RESOLUTION NO. 2651 ---- 4. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22'" prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. S. Frank Zepp Brld!j8. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations. the Frank Zepp Bridge at S.W. IIlrd StreeVS. IBOth Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila alliees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila. the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the Intersection of S.W. 4lrd Street and West Valley Road (SR-IBI). formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent. should be assumed In total by the City of Kent. 6. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S.W. 4lrd Street. West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City llmlts and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said eXisting utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall Impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 7. SR-IBI. The City of Renton should enter Into an aoreement with the State of Washington regar'dlng the transfer of costs to the State for Improvements to SR-IBI between S.W. 4lrd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. B. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary llne shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference as If set forth In full. SECTION VI: The Mayor Is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to that certain aoreement entltlted -Interlacal Aoreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations-containing the terms and conditions outllned In Section 5 above. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _..:..7t::.!h!..-_ day of --,J~u:.:l,,"y _____ , 19B6. ~e-."JGf:~ Maxine E. Motor. City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of July 19B6. Approved as to form: ~~"'v.d' 8:U!,.4 pt4v- Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney -3- " . .', . RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT A LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO TUKWILA FROM RENTON The lands proposed to be annelCed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown In FIOure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOe 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOe (p) T.9I 1.14 9 MOe (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 2' 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOe 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2', Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.'7 20 2.14 " '.69 17 5.9' '.01 2' (portion) 10.4' 24 (portion) 5.44 44.10 22 '.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. '6, Twn. 2', Rge. 4 97 '.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 4' 0.10 '7 0.17 '8 0.14 '9 0.14 5' 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 '5 2.84 '4 5.54 '6 3.09 TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 \ ', .. RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT B LANDS TO BE ANNEXED TO RENTON FROM TUKWILA The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwlla are listed below and shown in Figure I. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW and NE 1/4'5 of Sec. 25, Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 41 19.05 NE and NW 1/4'5 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 4 2'.44 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 42 16.0' SE 1/4. of Sec. 25. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14. Twn. 2'. Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0'20 .28 0"0 .02 Lot 4/2 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels. 114.01 ,'p • " . RESOLUTION NO. 2651 EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of )11 Future Annexation P,titions ---- 'f.' . .. . . ,wi',''';;; .. _:."': .. - . , \. · gu re 1 RESOLUTION NO. ...llil Renton-Tukwila 8oun6lry AdJus~nt Map of Affected ArelS LandS to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila 1000' , .. ,',. A & C F".E # ~b-6~ D.m ,(Ie / .:f.b A TT ACHMENT C INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING ~CIP~A~X~ THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, herei nafter referred to as "Tukwil a", and the Ci ty of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 ,which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. ~'~I ,which calls for certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit B to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual· benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. 3. S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to . improve traffic safety and capacity, the . ' . ,'I . Inter10ca1 Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street/So 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard/S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50%. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P-l Channel. The P-l Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P-l Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P-l Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should .have no obligation for di~e maintenance or rehabilitation. ,,,----. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of .the rec;iprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street/So 18Dth Street wi 11 be located ent i re 1y withi n the City of Jukwil a. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance: anQ.O· future wi deni ng for the bri dge. Both part i es understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR-181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR-181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR-181 between S. W. 43rd Street and 1-405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements. oral or otherwise. shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DATED this /I Efdayof ~ .. at. 1986. APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATT / ? CITY OF RENTON ~niRk?~~J~oc~~CJu APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY c(::;-:~.: : LAW • w~. A RN Y ,' .. ,'," EXHI BIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24 Twn. 23, RQe. 4 27 ~ort ion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MOC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MOC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MOC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 44.10 21 MOC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.4' SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 D.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (port i on) 5.44 44.10 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 l3 0.12 29 0.32 , 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15. 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 I 34 5.54 I 36 3.09 I I TOTAL I 45 parcels 101. 65 \ -' F' 're 1 Renton-Tukwil .. Boundary AdjuS tment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton ~ Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila o 1000' ,'. . , .' .. EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 -- SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot 112 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 F' Ire 1 Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton ~ to Tukwila Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila " 2,000' .... , " " EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila-Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions . . . ;~L·~",,::~,.:., , ~I" I .' I I - . , • -, City of Tukwila 6200 South center Boulevard Tukwila washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary l. vanDusen, Mayor Brice Martin, Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board Room W378, King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Notice of Intention "Southern" Portion Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Dear Mr. Martin: September 11, 1986 As required by the provisions of RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby given by the Cities of Tukwila and Renton to adjust their irregular mutual boundary and to exchange approximately 163 acres of land lying generally between South"180th Street (Tukwila)/S.W. 43rd Street (Renton) and Treck Drive (Tukwila)/S.W. 29th Street (Renton). As the enclosed materials indicate, the Notice of Intention refers to the southern portion of a 216-acre boundary adjustment between Renton and Tukwila. The boundary adjustment/annexation action is being sought under the authority of RCW 35.10.217. Thank you for forwardi ng thi s request for Boundary Review Board consideration. RF /sjn enclosure ~c (J'H€A. '" PC/Q.TI ON Sincerely, ~/~ C-L-tt-7v X Rebecca Fox Tukwila Planning Department RENTON/TUKWILA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION "Southern Portion" NOTICE OF INTENTION As required by RCW 36.43, a Notice of Intention is hereby given to the King County BoundarY'Review Board by the Cities of Renton and Tukwila. 1. Background Information The Cities of Renton and Tukwila propose to straighten the highly irregular common boundary between the two jurisdictions by adopting the eastern edge of the Burlington Northern right-of-way as the new boundary between the two cities. The adjusted corporate limits will resolve or substantially improve several problems which now exist due to the existing irregular border. The primary problems include the following: A. The Green River and several railroad tracks make access to a number of properties very difficult for emergency (police and fire) vehicles. Rea 1 i gnment of the boundari es wi 11 resu 1 tin better servi ce by both cities and also reduce response times. B. Utili ty (water and sewer) servi ce and maintenance will be improved because the lines and mains will be accessed more easily by the respon- si ble c.ity. C. Some businesses are located in one city but identified by zip code or name in the other city. The most obvious example is Andy's Tukwil a Station, presently in Renton. Approval of the propose9 adjustment will place the diner in Tukwila. D. A number of property owners with large landholdings (such as Burlington Northern) will have their future development plans greatly simplified by having to deal with only one jur.isdiction rather than two. Chronology: The administrations of Renton and Tukwila have long recognized that the current joint boundary between the two cities is not necessarily . the most satisfactory for the efficient provision of public utilities and emergency servi ces to those areas of each city whi ch are cut of,f from the main body by the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific Railroad rights-of- way. With the approval of both ci ty council s, the admi ni strat ions of each ci ty c'ooperatively explored the feasibility and desirability of a boundary adjustment to increase the efficiency of public service delivery. On October 15 and October 28, 1985, key staff from both cities met. and reached a general understanding of what each city considered important in the imple- mentation of the proposed boundary adjustment. Both cities held a joint public meeting on January 30, 1986 for area residents and property owners. On June 16, 1986, the City of Tukwila passed Resolution #1008 authorizing the simultaneous annexation/de-annexation actions by the Tukwila and Renton Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion" Page 2 City Councils. Renton passed Resolution #2651 on July 7, 1986 which Slml- 1 ar1y authori zes certai n property currently located withi n Renton to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of'certain property currently located in Tukwila. On August II, 1986 repre- sentatives of both cities signed an inter10ca1 agreement regarding the annexations. Structure of Application: The entire boundary adjustment affects a total of 215.66 acres in 56 parcels with a total assessed valuation of $17,257,845. Si nce the area to be annexed/exchanged is 1 arge, it has been di vi ded into· two portions ("South" and "North") for purpose-s of Boundary Review Board consideration. Two separate applications ("South" and "North") are being submitted for review. Each app1 ication discusses 1 and from Renton to be exchanged for land from Tukwila and land from Tukwila to be exchanged for 1 and from Renton. Thi s app1 i cati on ("Southern") addresses the terri tory 1 ocated generally between South 180th Street (Tukwi 1 a)/S.W. 43rd Street (Renton) and Treck Dri ve (Tukwil a)/S.W. 29th Street (Renton). It i nc1 udes a total of 162.71 acres in 33 parcels with an assessed valuation of $14,395,700. 98.93 acres will be ceded to Renton, while 63.78 acres will go to Renton. 2. Copies of Tukwila and Renton's respective resolutions accepting the boundary adjustment proposals and the inter10ca1 agreement between Renton and Tukwila are included as Attachments A through C. 3. A copy of the SEPA check 1 i st wi th the Dec1 arat i on of Non-s i gni fi cance at- tached is included as Attachment D. 4. The Cities of Tukwila and Renton are seeking annexation and de-annexation of the area subject to RCW 35.10.217 as amended during the 1986 regular session of the Washington State Legislature (HB 1386 -Inter-City Annexations). A copy of the appropriate chapter of the Code is included as Attachment E. 5. The legal description of the area proposed to be annexed to Tukwila is shown as Attachment F, and the legal description of the area to be annexed to Tukwila is shown as Attachment G. 6. A map showing complete corporate entities and the annexation area is includ- ed as Attachment H. 7. A vicinity map is included as Attachment I. 8. Please refer to Attachment H above. 9. A. The annexation area population is very small, containing fewer than five single-family reside·nces. The area of Tukwila to be given to Renton is zoned M-l for "1 i ght manufacturing". The Renton area to go to Tukwila is zoned M-P for "Manufacturing Park". B. The existing land uses include primarily retail, wholesale and manu- facturing. They also include vacant land and very small amount of Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion" Page 3' residential. It is expected that the vacant land will be developed for industrial park-type use. Residential uses will eventually redevelop for commercial use, and commercial/manufacturing will remain. C. (1) The area lies within the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan (adopted 09/19/77), and the City of Renton Comprehen- sive Plan Compendium (adopted 03/03/86). Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan designates both the land to be given to Renton and the area to be recei ved from Renton as "1 i ght i ndustri a1". Renton's Com- prehens i ve P1 an des i gnates the area to be gi ven to Tukwil a as "manufacturing park/multiple option -industry". A small portion of this property is also designated "greenbelt". (2) Neither Tukwila nor Renton has a franchise for the area. A fran- chise may eventually be sought for Renton to continue to provide water and sewer service to the area that it is ceding to Tukwila. (3) N/A. (4) N/A. (5) N/A. (6) The area currently in Tukwil a is covered, by Tukwil a's Water Com- pr,ehens i ve P1 an (1982) and Tukwi 1 a's ?ewer Comprehens i ve P1 an (1982). The area currently is in Renton's Comprehensive Sewer Plan (1983) and Renton's Comprehensive ,Water Plan (1983). D. The topography of the ent ire annexat i on area is generally f1 at and follows the Green River Valley. E. The projected population is likely to be small or negative as the area develops for commercial and/or manufacturing use. The proposal lies within Census Tracts #262 and #259 which respectively had populations of 3,505 and 242 in the 1980 census. The estimated 1985 projections are 3,628 and 222 respectively (PSCOG). Future projections are not available. The entire City of Tukwila had a 1980 population of 3,505, with a 1986 population estimate of 4,780. Total Tukwila employment was 20,930 in 1980 with a 1990 projection of 29,508 (PSCOG). The entire City of Renton had a 1980 population of 31,031 with a 1986 population estimate of 34,460. Total Renton employment was 39,935 in 1980 with a 1990 projection of 45,513 (PSCOG). F. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila would be responsible for the area's police and fire protection. Police protection would come from the Tukwil a Pol ice Department at 6200 South center Bou 1 evard. Fi re protection would be based in the Tukwila Fire Department at 444 Andover Park East with backup from the Fire Station #56, 5900 South 147th. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion" Page 4 Tukwila would also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. tenance servi ce wou1 d be provi ded from the City Shops at 600 Boulevard. No problems are anticipated in serving the area. Main- Minkler Upon annexation to Renton, Renton will be responsible for the annexed area's pol i ce and fire protect i on. Pol ice protecti on wou 1 d come from the Renton Police Department at City Hall, 200 Mill Avenue South. Fire protection would be provided by Renton Fire Station. #13 at 17040 S.E. 108th with backup from Fire,Station #12 located at 211 Mill Avenue South. A new station is proposed for the Valley Industrial area. Upon its completion, that station would assume primary responsibility for the annexation area. Renton would also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. Maintenance would be provided from Renton's maintenance complex at N.E. 2nd Street and Monroe N.E. Renton would continue to own and operate sewer and water service to the area just north of 43rd Street (South 180th Street) between the Green River and the BN railroad tracks through ihter10ca1 agreements. The utility surcharge normally imposed on out-of-city subscribers would not be imposed in this unique circumstance. A franchise might be sought'at a later date. G. The cur"rent location of Tukwila's community facilities include: 1) the Tukwila City Hall and Police Station located approximately Ii miles to the northwest; 2) the fi're station located approximately 1-i mile to the west; 3) the Tukwila Library located approximately two miles to the northwest; 4) the Tukwila Community Center located approximately three miles to the northwest. Various parks, including the Fos~er Golf Links are 1 to three miles away. Renton's communi ty f acil i ties wou1 d serve the areas newly-annexed to Renton. These include Renton City Hall, Police Station and Library, each located approximately four miles from the annexation area. Fire station #13 is located approximately one mile from the annexation area with backup from Fire Station #12 approximately four miles away. City- owned wetlands are approximately * mil e from the annexat i on area. Other park 1 ands, recreat i on and pub 1 i c schoo 1 f acil it i es are ,located within i mile. ' H. 1. Municipal services are presently' provided to the area by both Renton and Tukwila. Renton provides water and sewer to the areas currently in Tukwila and in Renton. Renton and Tukwila provide fire, police and emergency protection to areas within their re- 'spective current boundaries. At the time of annexation, fire po 1 i ce and emergency servi ces wou 1 d be assumed by the annexi ng jurisdiction. Since Renton developed the lines, it would continue to provide service to both the newly annexed areas in both Tukwila and Renton. A franchise' is anticipated. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion" Page 5 2. The current and proposed development is consistent with the "urban" designation in King County's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Present costs of City of Tukwila and City of Renton services are described below. The major perceived impacts of the proposed boundary change to property owners ,would be in the area of prop- erty taxes. Listed in the table below are the individual levies of the various taxing districts located in the affected code areas of the two cities. a. Property Taxes .:..;TAc.;:X.:..::I.:.:.NG=--=D..:.I::.;STc.::Rc:.I=-CT:...:S'--___ CODE 2110 (Renton) CODE 2340 (Tukwil a) State of Washington King County $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37786 .14372 3.09176 $ 3.54076 1.56652 .37785 .14372 Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Services City of Renton City of Tukwi 1 a 2.64215 2.24799 .27673 School District No. 403 Hospital District No.1 2.24799 .27673 b. TOTAL RATES (per $1,000) $11.24534 $10.79573 Source: King County Department of Assessments The levies for each city are identical with the exception of the individual city tax' levy figures. The result is that an average tax bill would cost the property owner approximately $0.40 more per $1,000 in Renton than it would in Tukwila. Water Rates City of Tukwila: Meter Minimum Size Charge 3/4" $ 6.80 1" 10.80 1 1/2" 15.30 2" 19.80 3" 37.80 4" 50.80 6" 92.80 8" 140.80 The mlnlmum charge is for 500 cubic feet or less. For each 100 cubic feet in excess of the 500 cubic feet allowed. for the mlnlmUm charge, the rate shall be fifty.cents per 100 cubic feet. Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application City of Renton: Basic Service Charge: Meter Minimum Size --Charge 3/4" . $ 3.40 1" 4.70 1-1/2" 7.40 2" 12.20 3" 24.70 4" 42.65 6" 92.15 8" 162.70 10" 252.65 12" 362.10 Commodity Rates: o -2,500 2,500 -35,000 over 35,000 c. Sewer Rates City of Tukwila: "Southern Portion" Page 6 $0.08 per 100 ft 3 0.82 per 100 ft 3 0.71 per 100 ft 3 (1) Residential Service: A flitt rate of $5.20 per month for each single-family residence shall be charged. (2) Multiple and Industrial: The rate of $5.20 per month for the first dwelling unit and $4.70 for each addi- tional unit shall be charged. (3) Commercial and Industrial: A flat rate of $5.20 per 900 cubic feet or less of water usage shall be charged. The rate of . sewage service on premises using more than 900 cubi c feet of water per month shall be .52 cents per additional 100 cubic feet. (4) Penalty Charge: .50 cents per month on sewer accounts more than 30 days in arrears. City of Renton: Renton City Sewer 1. Single family residence 2. All other users -$3.85 -$3.85 per 900 ft 3 H20 used -, . . - Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion" Page 7 Metro Sewer 1. Single-familY residence 2. All other users -$8.50 -$8.50 per 900 ft3 H20 used The charges for sewer without City water shall be $12.35 per single-family residence which includes $8.50 Metro charge. The rates for metered water service suppl ied to premi ses outside the Renton City Limits shall be an amount equal to one and five-tenths (1.5) times the rate fixed for water service supplied to users within the City. d. Metro Rates: The City/Metro charges as required by the Agreement for Sewage Oi sposa 1 between the Muni ci pa 1 i ty of Metropolitan Seattle and the City of Tukwila and the City of Renton is set at the sum of $8.50 per residential customer. The Metro charge for other residential customers is $8.50 for each 900 cubic feet of water used. (1986 rates for METRO) e. Standby· Charges -Tukwil a: The rate for fi re protect i on lines (building sprinkler systems) shall be deemed service charges and shall be, .for anyone month or fractional part thereof, as follows: Size Service Charge 2" $ 6.00 3 11 9.00 etc .... f. Electricity: No change in rates would result from annexation since electrical energy is supplied to Renton and Tukwila by Puget Power at the same rate. g. Utility Tax: Tukwila has no utility tax. Renton levies a 5% utility tax. 4. No other currently constituted municipal entity is capable of providing subject services to the area. 5. An interlocal agreement between Renton and Tukwila dated Aug- ust II, 1986 spells out areas of mutual concern and responsibility regarding future improvements and infrastructure responsibilities. (See Attachment C.) . It also stipulates that Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the new boundary lines. Annexation of the 1 arge Burl i ngton Norttiern property to Renton may f aci 1 itate development of this area by consolidating the property into one jurisdiction, and improving the availability and lowering the cost of emergency services and utilities. I ~ Renton/Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Application "Southern Portion'" Page 8 6. The proposal may increase the level of service for the new annex- ation areas due to the increased proximity of service facilities. 7. The annexation will have little, if any, impact on jurisdictions other than Renton and Tukwila. I. If the adjustment is approved, Renton will cede to Tukwila 63.78 acres in 20 parcels for a total assessed valuation of $11,700,900. Tukwila will cede to Renton 98.73 acres in 4 parcels for a total assessed valu- ation of $2,694,800. Renton will realize at,. least a temporary net loss of $9,006,100 in assessed valuation. Notwithstanding the net loss of assessed valuation to Renton, the annexations will have an overall positive impact on Renton and Tukwila. There will be little, if any, impact on other government, economic or social interests. J. The proposal supports the stated object i ves of the Boundary Revi ew Board in the following ways: ' RCW 36.93 .180( 3): The proposal extends 1 ogi ca 1 servi ces areas based on proximity to basic municipal services. RCW 36~93.180(4): The proposal extends logical service areas based on prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. RCW 36.93.180(7): The proposal help's adjust an impractical boundary. ATTACHMENT 0 1147N CITV OF RENTON DETERMINA TlON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF -038-86 APPLICA TlON NO(s).: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: PROPONENT: LOCA TION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCV: Application for a proposed adjustment of the common boundary line between Renton and Tukw\la In order to more logically provide services to the citizens of both communities. City of Renton Policy Department/City of Tukwila Development property located In the southwest quadrant of the City generally following the easterly rl~t-of-way line of the BN railroad tracks. City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determIned that It does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment. An envIronmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under" RCW 43.2IC.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other Information on flle with the lead agency. This Information Is ava\lable to the public on request. There Is no co'mment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than June 16. 1986. . You should be prepared to make specifiC factual objections. Contact City of Renton. BuildIng and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DA TE OF DECISION: MaY,28. 1986 PUBLICATION DA TE:June 2. 1986 '4 Raid G. Nel~so~nZl~:::::===-- Building and Zoning Director City of Renton ECF: lU: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental Impact statement (ElS) must be-'prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency Identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise Information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal' or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project, If applicable: Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Policy Development Department (206) 235-2552 200 Mill Ave. S. Steve Munson Renton, WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton -Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): The projected completion date of this proposal is 10/1/86. " ,',' 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further actlillty related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. However, future annexations and development proposals in the area will eventually be reviewed by staff of both communities. 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ECF-I08-85 (Checklist prepared for areawide rezoning of Green River Valley) ECF-004-84 (Checklist prepared for Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan update of 1984) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. The City of Renton is presently considering an areawide rezone application of the Green River Valley. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1) Adoption of Resolutions -Renton and Tukwila 2) Proposal Approval -King County Boundary Review Board 3) Public Hearing on annexing resolution -Renton and Tukwila II. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, Including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The City of Renton and the City of Tukwila are considering adjusting the common boundary line between the two communities. Renton would gain ±114 acres in 11 parcels from Tukwila while Tukwila would receive tlOl acres in 45 parcels from Renton. This measure is proposed in order to: 1) Provide more logical service areas including emergency response areas. 2) Clarify land use planning responsibilities. 3) Provide more logical mailing addresses. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient Information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, Including a street address, if any: and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, viCinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject proposal is located generally in the southwest quadrant of the City of Renton. The proposed r'ealignment would follow the easterly right- of-way line of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks from S.W. 43rd Street (5. 180th Street) on the south to the Green River crossing of Interstate 5 on the north. B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS I. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): ® rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 15%-20% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay, muck, peat d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Some evidence of instability in the past is present on some proper- ties. However, significant amounts of fill in recent years have substantially reduced this instability. -2- ", , , " e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of ·any .fllllng or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N.A. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. . N.A. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? N.A. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other Impacts to the earth, if any: N.A. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (l.e., dust, automoblle, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is compieted? If any, generally describe and give approxi,mate quantities if known. N.A. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: 3. WATER a. I) N.A. Surface: Is there any surface water body on or in the Immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. 1) Green River 2) Springbrook Creek -flows into Green River 2) Will the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plans. None in this application. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed In or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N.A. -3- · . . ' 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities If known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I DO-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Several portions of the subject proposal lie within the IOO-year floodplain, particularly along the Green River. 6) Does the proposal Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoxlmately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .: agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system{s) are expected to serve. N.A. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, If any (Include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow Into other waters? If so, describe. N.A. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N.A. -4- " .. " d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground. and runoff water impacts. If any: N.A. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types f ve etation found on the site: C deciduous tree.".':' ialp:d~ez:r5.;;if.~ c evergreen tree:'-';';:;.lI';:':'::::J c~ c~ , c crop or grain c Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup. bullrush. skunk cabbage. other c water plants: water Illy. eel grass, mil foil. other c other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N.A. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No species are known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping. use of native plants. or other measures to preserve .or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: N.A. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: c8aw~heron. eagle.<!ongbira;,other __ ..,."... _____ _ Mammals: eer. bear elk. beaver. other Small Fish: bass. ~€ou9 herring. shellfis"'h-.-o""th~e:::'r;:;';:;"----~ b, List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is within the Pacific flyway. -5- " .. . ' d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, If any: N.A. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N.A. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N.A. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N.A. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N.A. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for exampie: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N.A. -6- ", ;. ' 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a' short-term or a long-term besls (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N.A. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, If any: N.A. B. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current uses of the subject proper,ties include residential office, storage and warehousing, sewage treatment facilities, a rock quarry, meat rendering plant, and some light industrial activities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Some properties were used in the past for agricultural purposes but none are currently. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures include housing units, offices, warehouses, and utilities. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N.A. e. What Is the current zoning classification of the site? f. g. h. Both cities have several zoning categories in the subject area. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? There are a number of Comprehensive Plan land use designations in the subject area for each community. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Some portions along the Green River (near S. W. 43rd Street and north of Longacres at I-405) are designated "Urban" in the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program (1983). Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Several strips on both sides of the proposed boundary line south of I-405 and north of S.W. 43rd Street in Renton are designated "Green- belt.1I This includes some limitations on development. N.A. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N.A. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N.A. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N.A. -7- ,.' I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal Is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If an)': 9. HouslnQ The review and consideration of the staffs and legislative bodies of both cities has taken into account all existing and projected land uses and plans. a. Appro)(imatel), how man)' units would be provided, if an),? Indicate whether high, middle. or low-income housing. N.A. b. Appro)(imatel), how man), units. if an),. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle. or low-income housing. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if an)': N.A. 10. Aesthetics a. What Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not Including antennas: what Is the principal e)(terlor bullding material(s) proposed. N.A. b. What views In the immediate viclnit)' would be altered or obstructed? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: N.A. Ii. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N.A. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N.A. c. What e)(lsting off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N.A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. If any: N.A. -8- I"~ ,- , . " 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the Immediate vicinity? there are some facilities provided by private enterprises for their employees and some public exercise facilities. Fort Dent Park (a King County facility) is located near the north central portion of this study area as is the Foster Golf Course. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: N.A. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for. national. state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological. scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: N.A. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. The major public highways servicing the subject area include 1-405, 1-5, and SR 181. Some arterials of both communities are also located here. b. Is site currently served by publlc transit? If not. what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit has a number of routes traversing the area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N.A. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? -If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 1) Both communities will either assume or share responsibility for the following public improvements: a) Future crossing of Strander Boulevard/S.W. 27th Street and the railroad tracks. b) Grade separated crossing of S.W. 43rd Street and the_railroad tracks (if undertaken). c) Maintenance and future widening costs for the Green River Bridge at S.W. 43rd Street/South 180th Street. 2) The City of Renton should enter an agreement with the State of Wash- ington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR 181 -between S.W. 43rd Street and 1-405. --9- .. I .,1 , e. Wlll the project use (or occur In the Immediate vicinity of) w~ter. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. N.A. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. Indicate when peak volumes would occur. N.A. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation Impacts. if any: See #l4(d) above. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result In an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. No. Responsibilities for specific services will just be exchanged between the two cities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services. if any. See below. 16. Utilities a. 9U:) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the Project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ' See #lS(b) above. C. SIGNA TURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the'lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might Issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner lS.b. Those services most directly affected will be utilities. The City of Renton (through an inter local agreement) should retain ownership of existing utilities located north of S.W. 43rd Street and west of the railroad tracks and should be responsible for operation and maintenance. The City of Renton should provide sewer and water service to the dairy barn area north of 1-405 when such service is needed. Surcharges for utility users located in the annexation/de-annexation area should be terminated after annexation. -10- #176 11-8-84 ,-, " ,.1 ., .. , O. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FDR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the llst of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions. be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities llkely to result from the proposal. would affect the Item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not Implemented. Respond briefly and In general terms. I. How' would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water: emissions to air: production. storage. or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances: or production of noise? This depends upon the specific proposals for individual properties in the communities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N.A. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish. or marine llfe? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals. fish. or marine llfe are: N.A. 3. How would the proposal be llkely to deplete energy or natural resources? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N.A. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection: such as parks. wilderness. wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat. historic or cultural sites. wetlands, floodplains. or prime farmlands? It may serve to indirectly improve the water quality of the Green River and give some integrity to the Greenbelt designations of those areas straddling the proposed boundary line. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Several inter local agreements regarding utilities and road improvements may'help reduce some otherwise adverse impacts. -il - , .. 5. How would the proposal be llkely to affect land and shorellne use. including whether it would allow or encourage land or shorellne uses incompatible with existing plans? It should serve to discourage or disallow such incompatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The inter local agreements mentioned in 4 (above) will likely reduce these impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N.A. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N.A. 7. Identify. If possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Based upon the efforts put together so far, no such conflicts are foreseen. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Munson -12- I" ..... ,. ATTACHMENT E Consolldadon And Annexation 35.10.360 Chapter 35,04 INCORPORATION OF INTERCOUNTY AREAS SeCtions )l.04.010 )l.O4.llO )l.04.16O )l.04.170 )l.04.180 )l.04.19O throu8h H.04.14O Repealed. Recodified a5 RCW 3l.02.230. Recodified as RCW 31.02.240. Recodified as RCW 31.02.210. Repealed. Decodified. 35.04.010 through 35.04.140 Repealed. See Supple- mentary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. 3s.o4.150 Recodified as Rew 35.01.130. See Sup- plement~ry Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec- tions. thts volume. 35.04.160 Recodified as Rew 35.01.140. See Sup- plementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec- tions. thts volume. 35.04.170 Recodlned as Rew 35.01.150. See Sup- ~ementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sec- tions. this volume. 35.04.180 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. 35.04.190 Decodlfled. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections. this volume. Chapter 35.10 CONSOLIDATION AND ANNEXATION OF CITIES AND TOWNS Sections !l.l0.217 1l.l0.360 11.10.365 H.lOJ70 ;110.110 ~\ 10.520 ~! 10.530 Methods for annexation. • Annexation-Transfer of nrc department employees. Annexation-Transfer of nrc department employ- e .. -Ri8hts and benefits. Anneution-Transfcr of fire department employ- e .. -Notice-Time limitation. Consolidation-Transfer of fire department employ- .... (Effective July I. 1987.) Consolidation-Transfer of fire department employ- e .. -RiShts and benefits. (Effective July I. 1987.) Consolidation-Transfer of nrc department employ· e .. -Notice-Time limitation. (Effective July I. 1987.) 35.10.117 Methods ror annexation. The following methods are available for the ann .. ation of all or a part .,[ a cily or town to another city or town: II) A petition for an election to vote upon the annex- ilIOn. which proposed annexation is approved by the .'llSlat.ive body of the city or town from which the terri- cory Will be taken. may be submitted to the legislative >ldy of the city or town to which annexation is pro- ~. An annexation under this subsection shall other- ';" conform with the requirements for and procedures ~ a petition and election method of annexing unincor- rated territory under chapter 35.13 RCW. except for the requirement for the approval of the annexation by the city or town from which the territory would be taken. (2) The legislative body of a city or town may on its own initiative by resolution indicate its desire to be an- nexed to a city or town either in whole or in part. or the legislative body of a city or town proposing to annex all or part of another city or town may initiate the annex- ation by adopting a resolution indicating that desire. In case such resolution' is passed. such resolution shall be transmitted to the other affected city or town. The an- nexation is effective if the other city or town adopts a resolution concurring in the annexation. unless the own- ers of property in the area· proposed to be annexed. equal in value to sixty percent or more of the assessed valua- tion of the property in the area. protest the proposed an- nexation in writing to the legislative body of the city or town proposing to annex the area. within thirty days of the adoption of the second resolution accepting the an- nexation. Notices of the public hearing at which the second resolution is adopted shall be mailed to the own- ers of the property within the area proposed to be an- nexed in the same manner that notices of a hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by a city or town as provided in chapter 35.43 RCW. An annexation under this subsection shall be p0- tentially subject to review by a boundary review board or other annexation review board after the adoption of the initial resolution. and the second resolution may not be adopted until the proposed annexation has been ap- proved by the board. (3) The owners of property located in a city or town may petition for annexation to another city or town. An annexation under this subsection shall conform with the requirements for and procedures of a direct petition method of annexing unincorporated territory. except that the legislative body of the city or town from which the territory would be taken must approve the annexation before it may proceed. (4) All annexations under this section arc subject to potential review by the local boundary review board or annexation review board. [1986 c 253 § I; 1985 c 281 § 15; 1969 ex.s. c 89 § 4.J 35.10.360 Annexation--Transrer or fire depart- ment employees. Upon the annexation of two or more cities or code cities. any employee of the fire department of the former city or cities who (I) was at the time of annexation employed exclusively or principally in per- forming the powers. duties. and functions which are to be performed by the fire department of the annexed city or code city. as the case may be. (2) will. as a direct consequence of annexation. be separated from the em- ploy of the former city, code city or town, and (3) can perform the duties and meet the minimum requirements of the position to be filled. then such employee may transfer employment to the fire department of the an- nexing city, as provided in this section and RCW 35.10.365 and 35.10.370. (t986 RCW Sa~'I. 1511 ATTACHMENT F LANDS TO TUKWILA ("SOUTHERN") That portion of Section 25 and )6, Township 2) North, Range 4 East, •• M., King County, Washington more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as recorded in Volume III of Plats, pages 42- 44, Records of King County, Washington and the South line of Government Lot 6 situate in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 2) North, Range 4 East; Thence west along said South line, said line a!so being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1764 (amended by Ordinance No. 1928) to the Westerly bank of the Green River (White River); Thence Southerly along said Westerly bank and existing said City limits to the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section )6; Thence continuing Southerly along said Westerly bank and said city limits to the Westerly extention of the North boundary line of the Henry Adams Donation Claim NO.4); Thence East along said North boundary line and its westerly extension and said city limits to the centerline of Secondary State Highway Number 5M; -, '-.. Thence South along said centerline and said city limits to the Westerly ..~ extension of a line lying parallel with and 30.0 feet Southerly of the centerline of S.W. 4Jrd street (South l80th); Thence East along said Southerly line and its westerly extension and said city limits to an intersection with the Southerly extention of the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of the Burlington Northern Railraod (former Northern Pacific Railway) ; Thence North along said Easterly line and its southerly extension to an intersection with the South line of the southwesi· 1/4 of Section 25; Thence continuing North along said East line to its intersection with the South line of Government Lot 6 and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 0 f 1 r ATTACHMENT LANDS TO RENTON ("SOUTHERN") BURLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL VACATION That portion of Sec:tion 25, T23N, R4E, W.M., described as follows: Conlnlencing at the intersection of the easterly margin of West Valley Highway (Formerly known as Secondary State Highway No.5-M) and the north line of the south 990 feet of the north- west 1/4 of said Section 25; thence easterly along said north line,660 feet more or less to the easter~y margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing along said north line 510 feet more or less to the east line o·f said northwest 1/4; thence continuing easterly along said north line of the south 30 acres of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 1320 feet more or less to the east line of said subdivision; thence southerly along said east line and along the east line of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, 2260 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 25~ thence westerly along the south line of said north- west 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said Section 25, and along the south line of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 25, 542.81 feet to the easterly margin of the Nofthern Pacific Railr'oad; .thence northerly along said easterly margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. , G , Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton ATTACHMENT I "SOUTHERN" PORTION LONGACRES :;.; Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton 2000· :kc-(vJ.~ ~ t~ r+'-j kh~~-\ '\~ . f(;yl(~ ~I ---------- -....: ;)' ~t;.lu;1? ,' .. ~~ ®~\ --.---.. -. . ------- . "'v-v.»'\~ \'PV-"'D~~ \, , \1(\"/01)-.-'>'\ {\l &" ,po 0 uC . '~\~e.l '? , Co~\v ~e cJ./<f L_f \'0 \ .1 I..,.... ~~. -. =----------~--