HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File· ,
I
I
I c. __ .
(.HI(A60 MILWAUKEE
._._._._._._._.2!£~L.
CORP.
Of AMERICA
SOUT
I
I " , _________ .......... ___ -',,_,~"c:""
'~, I
" I '~, I
" I ';, ~
'.' " '.' " ,~, .,"
. ~~~
I " . , '~.
I
/j "' . !
!
I 1
:::-::=.:::::':::---::::::-_. =.::--,
\
\ ,
\
PACIFIC,
• I ,
.-.-._\~ .' \ ''i:~:'-'-'
"-
"-IP -.. , ..
" ,
"-
IP '-
"
"-PACIF
"-,
"-"-"--
EARliNGTON GOO
,I
I' ,I
" .-, ......
\ ....... -~ , , , ,
MUN'ti,fA LI
' ....... :
TR
., ... ---
----"'"
SOUTH
AREA
--,--,---
,
;
l
\
\ -. '. -.....
\
~\
.~
GOy't lot I
13.70 Acres
CONrAINER GDRP.
OF AMERICA
CORP,
OF AMERICA
\
\ ,
\
:;-"F'-'-'=,"-"==·=· -.. _. -.~.
\. \~:
TOWER o
EA1?l.INGTO/V
" ,I
,I
" II
" \ .............. , ' , ,
--"
~~
,,---,---' --
.'.
SOUTH
AREA
Gov't lof I
13.70 Acres
AM£R,(.A
--__ i'_···
CORP,
AMERICA;
, .. "" .,. '" 'h"" t"" ,
'\
,,, ",LI. '\
/} ,-I , , ,_ .. _-----.......... -... --.:>..-~ .. ~~ \"--",.,--"'.,,.
,~, I -)
'~" ' " I '~, I '~. '
" " '" ,
\~,' "," '.'''' ., -:..'
I "
I " I '" . ".
I I " . I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
\
\ ,
PACII
\
C· -:-. _. -"-.'iff!f.
"', \ '\.'<' . ...-...... . .. ~
'<-__ ~ _____ " '_ ... _H'-
7:l.lB " &
'-
EARI.INGTON
&t-4TAlr·u:,,, ~rz..P. fJF.
AMEll.lCA ANNE~TION 01,.., c;p l2J:.t-tT"oN . ~JaIT I
CVI2PI=NT C!t1'f L-IMITS
DEUNt=AIl~ ~NEXATION
MET R f
I
I
\
---------t-
'-..... I . '-----i---
•
\
~~p" j _____ L __ ._. _______ ._. _. __ _
'~J.$''f / ~:k>" ,~-.. -,,,, I
I
I
I
I I
..
1--1--___ ~:"=~
I
I I
I I
I I
I ,
I I ~,
I I I °1 I I: ~ I IlL_
,
.J
-,
' .
. ::'" .'
i
i '.:" .. ,;
-:"1
:.'
-.
...• .". . ::
',;"
. .::; ;/;)'; :~: ; :'
.' :.' .: r' .,
'" ,. "
"
,
~
( , ,
,~ I "
()
--,Na~'T1-t '
E~I'STII.,)~ ~CA. o.>Jt-l6"P: ~1.7A:t .', " . -r~b.c::.,. ,A: 15_3A~ ','
" . f-:'_ TRAC.T B: 2.1.7t..."t
.' ~EMAJIJDE'e :,14.7 A±
"
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA PROpe~"'( INvEI.JTo"'_Y ,''''-z.·'.7"J I=~";:'::~ •• , A II iI!I ... , 0' A' C .11 fI cr u i I .. N. ..., ~ II i, II t---~"":";"":";-:"':"':""::':=--':"::"~!"-
..... 11'" , ,"I "''' 0'"0'" 'U/I • INIIICD IIU'''IIIIII Qt:NTo N F 0 l.. D 1 t.J c%i
" ...... ,. ........
. /:'"
/7' ,
. ,
\
..
. /
pr~CPH~TY~
LlI~E' ..
•
" .
..
5.143 rd ~T.
FICE --....r--,
"
'.
, ..
. .
PROPERTY -~
Llt-JE
..
. , , . .' . ~.'. . .. ," . i-
, .
SITE PLAN
, , . ; ~
--....... -.-.-...
I
I
/"
,".'
"
,
I
I
"
.'
....
, '
"\(" ~. .,/;--:';"
." ,0" "
• 0" ,
"( '.~ . ,
/ " ,", , '
.. -/j . :,,~,. ::;!'/t ' . '''''.''j;.'' . ,,~,'rh¥"t·LI·'" .
. .:~', ;:';:~: . "'.
" '
. ,: ;~'" ~ ~ • j ." t .
l. ~ ., ~'I • i'~,':\' :;< /"~,,:.'~'
, "
\',\. \ ,
, ,
\ \ I -\\~~ , V .
\ ' I I . /1.
I I·
I " '
II, "
1/' -,I
1/ '
/'
1/
/'
I' I
if I~
/ \7./~· J I ,t)
,': ~/': .. ' d ;,
I' I
.". I' ,I I
I I, ' ,;
: . ~; .
'f·
" i'.
.~.~ , .. _ .......
,'1 ~:-j .
" . . ',' ' ;I
• ". ~ i;·. " r ' " , , 'I
. ' .• //1. /'
", I . ,:" I
, '
','
, / ~: ' , ,:','. ," !.' ' ;'." /.
" ,. " f"~ ,~b'
, '
I, ':" ; , ' , ,::;/. '; .> .
- -;7,'/1 ,," iC;,:[;7.i'
" ,
EXlIIDIT n
,"
, ".'
: ':
,,0 "
Plof: Plan
25B
SOUTH
AREA
,
/
/
I
/
/
A· /~.,
/,:\
/'OQ
rA·
~~'v , ,
\, V , , , ,
" / ........
'y... "
\
.. ;!. \
•••• :' .. ~ I
, ···· .. /1/"·: / ': ...... , .. , . ,( ..... j ... 0'
j
. /'1 .,-... ..
I • ..... r"
j
.. : .... /".!) l t"
I J... I • ":! " ' .... :
\
\
, .: .. ~ ..
\ e,
\
\
\
\ ,
\
\
... " \. '-\: .. --"...
\,:.-....
T..l.7B
\
\
0.89 AC., ,
TOWER o
-------
\\
\'
.', .
. .,
~.:
• MET Rf .
'" .
-~---..:...-J--,,--. -.~~--"1\\c--;
I 5 PO· 5 AIL . \ 1
'I . t
I
,",",
..•. ,.
'I I'
'ft.
" :
I . . ~?4---L-__ -------
:'\EA~T I
I
----. ----L-----+----'l.I-. ,
. p 0 S· AI IL
I
----1---
I
I
!
I
I
!
i
\
i
(
. ~ , ,
J
t ,
· .
L __________ _
I
---........
'\
. ,
-.,' \ I
....
\ \ :
E T R f \\ :
------t-----~c -:
p 0 5 AI L\k~~~~~
I
Of ...... '. • (." . l' "it4:t.. _ .,..
".... "'--. i I.
t "'-.
ZONING SUMMARY
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA ANNEXATION and REZONE
Second Public Hearing -September 21, 1987
LOCATION
The area encompassed by the Container Corporation of America Annexation and Rezone
consists of 45.08 acres located on the west side the 600 to 11 00 blocks of Monster Road
SW (see Figure 1).
SUMMARY
The proponent of the Container Corp Annexation filed an application for concurrent
rezone of the 42 acres under their ownership to MP -Manufacturing Park. On January
20, 1987, the Renton Hearing Examiner held the first of the two required public
hearings on this rezone request. On January 29, 1987, the Hearing Examiner
recommended approval of the MP rezone. On February 9, 1987, the City Council held
the first of the two required public hearings on the imposition of MP zoning on the
remaining 3.08 acres of property owned by Metro, King County and Burlington
Northern Railroad (see Figure 2). On the same date, Council held the second of the two
required public hearings on the rezone of the 42 acres. Council concurred in both of the
MP recommendations. This zone is consistent with the subject site's Manufacturing Park
-Multiple Option designation on the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan.
The subject site consists of a manufacturing plant for the Container Corporation of
America. This annexation was approved by the King County Boundary Review Board
on July 26, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION
The Policy Development Department advises Council to concur with the recommendation
of the Hearing Examiner and the February 9, 1987 public hearing and impose MP
zoning on the 45.08 acres of property encompassed by the Container Corporation of
America Annexation.
ctdsk3
cca2
·l~~;' ...
~: ,: ..
'.I .
.. , .. : .
:1 .
: ~:
.. , ..
.....
......•
! .
I I·
i.
; :
• >
. '1---~
. I .-.""'~;~
I
• th \ ME T Rr \
. I . , --------+-----
I
P 0 5 AI L I .
I
w u «
III
I
..
I r
CHIlAC.Q MILWAUKF.E &
__ . _. __ ._._ .!1!!!8_ . ..:.Jl!._
CORP,
OF AMERIC.A
SOUTH
AREA
"
\ t:-"'~'-ING
,
\
\ ,
\ 'c'-, .-.-:~.-"', \ \-:: ... ---.. "'" ,,_-'-, ___ ~ ,,··,_ ... _M. __ '>l.
701..'8 " *
"-"-"-" "-"--
rOWEl! o
EARLINGTON
" "
"
"
" " \ .......... , , , , , ,
MUNt-
February 25, 1987
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
BARBARA y, SHINPOCH, MAYOR 235-2580
King County Boundary Review Board
King County Courthouse
Seattle, WA 98104
Re: NOTICE OF INTENTION
CONT AINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA ANNEXATION
Gentlemen:
As required by Chapter 36_93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City of
Renton gives Notice of Intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the
"Container Corporation of America Annexation," The land encompassed by this
annexation is located on the west side of the 600 to 1100 block of Monster Road SW. The
annexation is proposed by the petition method under the applicable provisions of Chapter
35A.14 of the RCW. The petition contains 99.8% of the assessed valuation within the
proposed annexation.
The following exhibits are submitted to assist the Board:
Exhibit No. I
Exhibit No.2
Exhibit No.3
Exhibit No.4
Exhibit No.5
Exhibit No.6
An area map illustrating the current municipal boundaries and the
proposed annexation.
A vicinity map of the proposed annexation indicating the King
County Fire District which services the subject site.
King County Assessor's map showing Renton's corporate limits in
the appropriate viCinity, the proposed annexation. and the number of
acres proposed for annexation (provided separately in this Notice of
Intention package).
A site map indicating the environmentally sensitive areas on the
subject site.
Renton City Council minutes related to this matter.
A legal description of the boundaries of the proposed annexation.
King County Boundary Review Board
Notice of Intention
Container Corporation of America Annexation
February 25, 1987
Page 2
Exhibit No.7
Exhibit No.8
The Final Declaration of Non-significance on the Container
Corporation of America Annexation prepared by the City's
Environmental Review Committee dated January 14, 1987, including
the environmental checklist and review sheets.
A review of municipal services available to the proposed annexation
per RCW 36.93.170.
Description of Proposed Action and Review of Factors Related to RCW 36.93.170:
The Container Corporation of America Annexation comprises approximately 45.08 acres
of land contiguous to existing city boundaries, and has a 1986 assessed valuation of
$4,508,400. The property is located within King County's Green River Valley planning
area and is currently zoned MH -Heavy Manufacturing. This zoning classification
provides for industrial enterprises involving heavy manufacturing, assembling, fabrication
and processing, bulk handling of products, large amounts of storage, warehousing and
heavy trucking. The City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as
Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. This designation is intended primarily for light
industrial uses compatible with com'mercial and office uses located in a park-like setting.
The area encompassed by the proposed annexation is currently in use as a manufacturing
plant for the Container Corporation of America, and as such, no individuals live on the
subject site. This use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation, and it
is not expected to change upon annexation to the City of Renton. If annexed, the subject
site will assume MP -Manufacturing Park zoning as recommended by City staff. . This
classification allows a wide variety of industrial, transportation, service and office
activities which meet high operational, developmental and environmental standards.
Existing land uses in the vicinity of the subject site include the Metro Sewage Treatment
Plant to the east, light industrial uses to the northwest and south, Fort Dent Park in
Tukwila to the west, and undeveloped property to the north which is part of the Black
River Forest and the P-I Channel.
Two areas of environmental sensitivity have been identified on the subject site, using the
criteria set forth in the City of Renton's proposed Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA)
Ordinance. A shallow seasonal wetland is located in the extreme northwestern corner of
the site, and there are slopes of over 40% in grade located in the southeastern portion of
the site adjacent to Monster Road SW. The applicant has indicated the intent to leave
these sensitive areas in their natural, undisturbed state, as is required by the proposed
ESA Ordinance. The site lies within the Black River sub-basin of the Green River
drainage basin.
King County Boundary Review Board
Notice of Intention
Container Corporation of America Annexation
February 25, 1987
Page 3
The annexation proposal is intended to simplify provisions of utilities to the subject site
and to minimize any development conflicts existing between the City of Renton, the City
of Tukwila, and King County. Water and storm water sewer services are presently
provided by the City of Renton. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by Local
Improvement District 332 in which the applicant has agreed to participate. This service
can be provided as a logical extension of existing facilities.
Review of Factors Related to RCW 36.93.180:
This annexation continues the process of simplifying the boundaries of the City of Renton
in the vicinity [(RCW 36.93.180(4) and (7»). The annexation will tend to protect and
enhance the present condition of existing land uses surrounding the subject site. By
protecting and not disturbing current neighborhood areas, the proposed annexation
complies with the required findings of the Boundary Review Board [RCW 36.93.180(1»).
Enclosed is the required $25.00 filing fee as required by RCW 36.93.120. Any questions or
other communications pertaining to the Container Corporation of America Annexation
should be directed to:
Carrie Trimnell, Assistant Planner
City of Renton
Policy Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
and to the following other persons, governmental units, and private service companies:
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
City of Renton
Fire District No. 20
Should Board members desire additional information to assist in the review process, please
contact the Policy Development Department, City of Renton.
Sincerely,
Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Mayor
Enclosures
BS:CT:2470G
~TAIHf,' ~.,. elF-
~EIZ.lC!A ANNE~TION
0'1, &F l2eKioN . t:XHI5IT I
.CVI2PI=NT 0(1,( UMITS
oe:uNt=AIJ~ ~NEXATION
~~~------,
I
I LAKE
WASHINGTON
MET R t
---------t-
I
I
_. __ ~I
I~--L I! :l_:illJ1:~HT~H~ ~. ~F ~~;;::::---r~im~!' ~~ AHNe~'TIDM
, . -<--~ti11 '!-! 1 /lYTV &¥ ~t:N. exJ4I£!>lT 2-I ~~ ._~ ~ •• I
I . \':JR.JXJ)
:"'l~l ~I~ 20 FI~~ DI?~Id-1?
11&--'-"-"',_ .l.~l :~-'-1 =-~'~~, r:'r-::----.---~\e. I" =e.:::ol
I
,
•. d:-~ ----L _. ---_.----'---_.-
'-" I ~~\
L
.····-1
..... 1_--
l~,
''\'"
..
~ u
<!
IY
f--
W u
<! I C>'
I :-~!-. {)
I W
i
, I r:1 I ,
U I I <i , I I ! I , ,0
•
~
Vi. 'IlL WerLAND ~
..... : ~ ~~ CNf.lZ... .qo /,
. ~~ III:f.pO?'
... \) \ .................... , ......
", "T'\ \
... ('oJ "
... ~\
, "',
\ .-(\. \ .. '\ -. \ ... ..:-\ ..
"': \-.... -----'\
---" \
"\ \""
\
\ \
T R ? \~ ----t----.-~;-\ I ' \
P 0 S AI L \~ \
I \'
I ~
fV('Y I 0 I 4:
i \ fY
f ----,.
tDH"A'N~ ~p. &JF ~1!PJeA.~~T1Dt4 . ~-ry of R,E.NTcN . exHIe.lT ?
0l1'( lUVNQ,lL MINLTrE..-S
February 9, 1987
Monday. 8:00 p.rn:
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Annexation: Container
Corporation 75% Petition
and Rezone. R~021-87
Annexation: Sierra
Heights 75% Petition and
Rezone
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
ReBular Meeting
MINUTES
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
Mayor B~rbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
THOMAS W. TRIMM. NANCY L. MATHEWS. JOHN W. REED. RICHARD
M. STREDICKE. KATHY A. KEOLKER. ROBERT J. HUGHES. EARL
CLYMER
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN. City
Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR. City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER. Policy
Developmen.t Director; LT. GARRY ANDERSON. Police Department
Gail Folkins. Valley Daily News
Correction Doted by Keolker: Page 41. paragraph seven, third line, chanle -)2
six-foot" to "six 12-foot." MOVED BY TRIMM. SECONDED BY
STREDICKE. COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF
FE.BR'UARY 2. 1987. AS CORRECTED. CARRIED.
This being the date let and proper noticel having been posted, published and
mailed in accordance with State and local laws. Mayor Shinpoch opened the
public hearing to consider the Container Corporation of America 75%
Annexation Petition and Rezone. The proposal. consisting of 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000 block.
includes a concurrent rezone to M-P. Manufacturing Park. zone to allow
installation of sanitary sewer service to the subject site for future
development. The applicant has applied to the Hearing Examiner for the
intensive M-P zoning classification on the property. and the Hearing
I ",xa,,,u,or,. recommendation for approval will be scheduled on the Council
I :~;,~~:;u~;:s if no appeals are filed (R-021-87). The hearing this date
the second of two required public hearings on the annexation and
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the
I ",uJ', m site. reviewed staff recommendations. and advised that although the
maJor"y of the subject site is owned by Container Corporation, small,
at the northern end are owned by Metro. King County and
Burlill.t"n Northern Railroad Company. Following approval of rhe I ",ne:ut.ion by the King County Boundary Review Board, a second public
l~i~~'.n~1~·:~f,b~:e;t~s:c~:h~e:duled to consider the rezone of the remaining portion to
1M-Po Park.
Upon Council inquiry regarding whether -Hobo Junction-is included in the
of the annexation, Lt. Garry Anderson. Police Department. indicated
his understanding that the area in question is no longer inhabited by
transients. and no problems have been reported .
.... n'v~n BY STREDICKE. SECONDED BY CLYMER. COUNCIL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE.
SECONDED BY REED. COUNCIL ACCEPT THE ANNEXATION.
l i;~~~S~TI~PU~L~A~TI~O~N~S~O~F~Z~O~N~IN~G~' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S
AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE
FOR SUBMISSION TO KING
CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted. published and
m~i1ed in accordance with State the local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the·
public hearing to consider the Sierra Heights 75% annexation petition and
rezone to R-I. single family resjdentjal zone. The proposal contains 33.71
acres and is located on the wesl side of 132nd Avenue SE (Union Avenue
NE) westerly to 128th Avenue SE from SE 102nd Street southerly 10 slightly
south of SE I06th Street.
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of (he
subject site which contains 69 parcels, reviewed stafr recommendations, nOled
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of SectIon 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-or-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-23-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the northerly Right-or-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-or-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the exIstIng City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances ~o. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line
through the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast
Quarter of said Section 23 and through the Southeast Quarter of Section 14 to
the thread of the Black River and the existIng lImIts of the City of Tukwila;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to the
southerly Right-or-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. 153rd
st.), being also the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under ordinances
No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said' southerly Right-or-Way Line
or Monster Road S.W. to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along the west Right-or-Way Line or said Monster Road
S.W. In the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 to the point of beginning.
F1.ll-8 02/09/87
aDH"A1N~ ~. ANNIt~TI"~
orry OF
L-r-C-tAL-
J2p4TON' ~IBI't,~_
~IPTION:
I >,
'i.
i ,
"
,
I ' ( ,:1
I I , I
:~ , ,,,
I,
;~\
, ,
,I
'c .• '
2138N
CITY OF RENTON
OETERMINA TJON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF -103-86
APPLICA T10N NO(s).: . N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to annex 45.08 acres (CCA. Metro.
and King County parcels) to the City of Renton.
PROPONENT: Container Corporation of America
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 7000 South 143rd Street.
Renton. WA 98055.
LEAD AGENCV: City of Renton. Bullding and Zoning Department.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it dOBS not have a probable
siQnificant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43.2IC.030(2){c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead BQency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South. Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 2J5-2550
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no
Jater than February 2. 1987.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton.
Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
DATE OF DECISION: January 14.1987
PUBLICA T10N DATE: January 19. 1987
Ronald G. Nelson
Bullding and Zoning Director
. .:' (. .' .'7, • • /' -' . .. ,L.. /i~'-~1.""·' '~ht>
Richard C. Houghton I'
Public Works Director .
~ctor ry M. I ger
~TAINe.~ ~. ~ ~~I~d A_.
~e)(ATIDN
~1"'( a= 12J=.NTa-4 . ~letT
(" ----.~; ---. --
E:N\lI~ Mt=NTAL-
PE6LAAATION
,"
EeF: I 103 -'ill;,
City of Renton LU: ~
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLlSTc,'"' t:::=::j ., OF RENTON
DEC 12 1988
purpose of Checklist: POuev
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 4l.21C RC~s "m'T
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EI5) must be prepared for ellproposals
with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency Identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
end to help the agency decide whether en EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic informalion about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your propo!.al are significant. requiring preparation of an E15.
Answer the Questions briefly. with the most precise Information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer. or If a Cluestlon does not apply to your proposal. write '"do not know· or '"does
not apply.· Complete answers to the Questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline: and
landmark designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems. the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
informatlon that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining jf there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of. Checklist for Nanpraject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDlTIDN. complete the SUPPLEMENT AL SHEET FOR
NDNPRDJECT AClJDNS (part D).
For nonproject actlons (actions involving decisions on poliCies. plans and programs).
the references In the checklist to the words "project," "applicant." and "property or site"
should be read as ·proposal,-·proposer,· and ·affected geographic area,'" respectively.
A.
I.
2.
l.
BACKGROUND
Name of proposed project. If applicable:
ANNEXATION to City of Renton, WA (King County):
Name of applicant:
45.08 acres (CCA. Metro, King
County Parcels)
Container Corporation of America
Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
H. J. Ramirez. General Manager (206) 235-3325
7000 South 143rd Street, Renton. WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared: Oecember 11, 1986
S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton. WA
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasirig. If applicable):
, ,
Immediate -to be phased with L.I.O.#332'."oaksdale Ave. S.W. with sanitary
sewer extens-ion to ,our property 1ine) anq in conjunction with our Application
to Rezone from K.C. "MH" to City of·~ent~:n "M-Pll. , ~,:.
7. Do you have any pl'ans for future additions. expansior. Jr further activity related
to or connectod with this proposal? if yes, explain.
None other than L.r.D. #332 (City of Renton)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared. directly related to this proposal.
None known
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None, other than our Application for Rezone from King County "MH" to City
of Renton "M-P".
to. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
if known.
None known
I J. Give brief, complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
No change in operational use.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficiont information for, a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and
section. township. and range If known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map. and topography map. if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
Address: 7000 South 143rd Street, Renton, WA (King County) 98055
B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS
I. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle o.ne): flat, rolling, e steep
slopes, mountainous, other_-..,. _____ .
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% -I/o Z
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Clay, sand and gravel
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? lf so, describe.
None known
-2-
(
'---
,;' (",
,
, . . '
1" ,.1
".'
2.
,.
e.
f.
g.
h.
AIR
-;'.
Oesc, .~e the purpose. type. and appro.: te quantities of any mllng or
grading proposed. Indicate sourCe of fill.
N/A
Could erosion occur es a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so,
generally describe.
N/A
About what po",ent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces
after project construction (for e.ample, asphalt or buildings)?
N/A
. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
N/A
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e ••
dust. automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is compieted? If any. generally describe and give
. ~pproximate quantities if known.
N/A
b. Are there any off-site sou",es of emission? No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
N/A
WATER ~I
a. Surface:
I)
2)
Is there any surface water body on or In the 1m mediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams. saltwater. lakes. ponds.
wetlands)? If yes. describe type a~d p~~ide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.' ,
Yes; Green & Black rivers adjacent to' property, but not on
our actual property. We have been advised that the N,W, segment of
our property has been classified as "Wet Lands" by King County. A
'large pond develops on this segment during the Winter and Spring
rain seasons.
Will the project require any work over. In. or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
N/A
') Estimate tho amount of fill and dredge material that would be piaced in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and Indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the sou",e of fill material,
N/A
-3-
(~.--..:
:-,,'
'",//-",-
r ,
'''1 1
'lt ('
\,
I, ,
( ;' , , ,-
,"';
I' ) ~ ....
g-:> . . . ~ ,.
WlII the pl1)J>osal require .urfece water "' .... drewel. or diversion.? Clve
general descr~on, purpose, and approximately quantltle." known.
No
5) Does tt.. proposal lie within a IOO-year flOOdPlain? If '0. note location on
the slle .. Ian.
6)
Ves (Renton -Kent V'alley Flood)
Does the propOsal Involve any discharge. of waste materials to .urface
waters? If so •. descrlbe the type of waste and antiCipated volume of
discharge.
No
.b. Crow ..
I) Will ground water be withdrawn. 'or' will water be discharged to ground
water? Cive general description •. purpose. and appaoxlmately quantities if
known.
2)
c.
No
Descnce waste material that wlll be discharged Into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, If any (for ex'ample: Domestic sewage:
Industr..J, containing the following chemicals • • .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems. the
number of houses to be served (If applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None
Water Runoff (including storm water);
,
/
I) Describe the source of runoff (Including storm water) and method of
coliecUon and disposal. If any (Include qua~t1t1es. If known). Where will
this water fiow? Will this water fiow Into other waters? If so, describe . . ,
Storm collection sewers around 'pe~imeier of plant buildings,
discharging into drain field.
. .
• 2) Could waste materials enter.: g!:ound or surface waters? If so. generally describe. . . _. ,".. ' ••
No, unless there was an.inadvertAht spill.
,-:!
,'.
'" , '
., .
'. d.
.-;-, ,
Propu"ad maasuras to reduce or control _.rlace, ground, and runoff ",ater
Impacts, If any: .
N/A
4. Plants
. . e " ,,, . . 'v ~
Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ® deciduous tree: alder, maple, .spen, other
o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
@ Shrubs
@) grass.
o crop or grain
@ Wet soli plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o ",ater plants: water lily. eel grass. muraU. other .
o other types of vegelation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or allered?
None
c. List threatened or endangered specIes known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping. use of native piants. or other measuras to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site. if any:
N/A
5. . Animals
a.
b.
Circle any birds and anlmais which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron. eagie. songbirds. other None Observed
Mammals: deer. bear. eik, beaver, other None Obseryed
fish: bass. salmon, trout, herring. shellfish. other None Obseryed
'.', '
Li,t Bny threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
. c. I. the site part of a migration route? If ,a, explain.
No
-5-
j
.~ ~--:(,~~ i
c· .
,:\ '
. Proposeo meaa~. to pre~rve or enhance \, .Aile, U any:
None
6, EnaroY and Natural Resources
"
. a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. all. wood stove. colar) will be
used to meet the completed project'. energy needs? Describe whether It
will be used for heaUng. manufacturing. atc.
Electric' -Plant/Office Power requirements
Natural Gas, -Heating Boiler
,
'.
b, Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so. generaUy describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservaUon features are Included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
Impacts. If any:
None
7. Environmental Haalth
a. 'Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic
chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No .. ', '
I) Describe special emergency aervlces that might be required.
Police and Fire Protection
, , .
2), Proposed measures to reduce or, control environmental health hazards. if
any: '. H."."_
N/A .. " ', ..
,'b. Noise
I) What types of noise exist In the area which may' affect your project (for
example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)?
None
-6-
, /-,)
".-r"--:~ ,/
./
/f , ,. ,
'''. ~
~)
\, /
, What t;;;"s and levals of noise would be c, __ .ed by Of associated with the
'project on a short-term or a long-term ba.i, (for exemple: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
N/A
Proposed measures to reduce or control nol.e Impacts, If any:
N/A
B, land and Shoreline Use
a. What Is the current use of the site end adjacent properties?
Manufacture of Paperboard Folding Cartons and Open Lands, Adjacent
to Manufacturing Plant and Office building.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Yes, Harvesting of Hay (last used in 1984).
c. Describe any structures on the slte.
Manufacturing plant and office building, 144.800 sq. ft. total
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e.
f.
g.
h.
No
What Is the current zoning classification of the site?
"M-H" Heavy Manufacturing by King County.
, Whet Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Unknown
If applicable, what Is the current shoreline' ";.ster program designation of
the site? " ' ," ' :-.. Not Known .. ,
Has any part of the site been classified as an -envlronmentaJJy sensitive-
area? If so, specify.
Not Known
I. Approximately how many people would reside Of work In the completed
project?
N/A
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/A
k. Proposed measures to avoId or reduce displacement Impacts. jf en),:
N/A
-7-
. ,
PropOIed moalures to ensure the proposal •• compaUble with existing and
projected land uI,el and plans. If any: ' '
I.
"
N/A
9. Houslng
a. Approxlniately how many units would be provided, If any? Indicate
whether high, middle. or low-Income housing,
None
b. 'Approximately how many unlh, If any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-Income housing.
NIP.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including
antennas: what is the principal exterior building materlal(s) proposed, , '
N/A
b. What views In the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aostheUc Impacts, If any:
N/A
II. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare wUl the proposal produce? What limo of day
, ,WOUld It mainly occur?
None
. "', '
,
/
b. ' Could light or glare from the finished pioJect be a .afety hazard or
, Interfere with views?
No
c., What existing off-site source~ ~f'lIght or glare may affect your proposal?
'. , None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare Impacts. If any:
N/A
"
12. Roc""aUon
8: What deslgnatod and Informal recreational opportunities are In the
Immediate vicinity?
None
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
Not applicable
c. Proposed moasures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any:
Not applicable
I}. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. nalional. stale.
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If SQ,
generally describe.
None
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evIdence of historic. archaeological.
scientific. or cullural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applicable
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to tho existing street system. Show on site plans, jf any.
South 143rd Street and Monster Road
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
No -approximately 1 mile
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eUminate?
Not applicable
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to
exIsting roads or streets, no! including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
None require·d because of Annexation or Rezone. However, City of
Renton.L.I.D. No. 332 will provide improved roads and extension of
sanitary sewer line to our property line.
-9-
e. Will the proJoct uso (or occur In the Immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or
air transportation? If so. gonerally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? '-If known, Indicate when peak volumes would occur.
115 employees - 3 shifts (7AM-3:30 PM)(3:30PM-11 :30PM) (11 :30PM-7AM)
38 employees -8AM-4:45 PM. Trucking approx. 10 per day
g. Proposed measures to reduco Dr control transportation impacts, If any:
None
15. Public Service, .
a. Would the project result In an Increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools. other)?
If so, generally describe.
Fire and Police only
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on 'public services.
If any.
Not applicable
16. Utilities
a. 'Circle utIlities currentl available at the site: ~mat"ura~ gas.~
water re use serv c olephone.)anitary s.wer.~tnffi;;.;"t.:-----
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility
. provIding the servIce, and tho general construction activities on the site or
In the Immediate viCinity which might be needed.
Sanitary sewer to replace septic system (RE: Renton L.I.D. #332)
C. SIGNA JURE
I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above Information is
true and complete. It Is undot'Stood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-sIgnificance that it might issue In reliance upon this 'checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or wUlful lack of full disclosure on
my part. . • .
Proponent:
Name Printed: H. J. Ramirez
-10-
,~ ..
I.
SUPPL£Mt .. ,AL SHEET fOR NONPROJECT A ... .IONS
(This sheet should only be used for actions Involving decisions on policies. plans and
programs. 00 not use this sheet for project actions.)
Becau.e these questions are very general, It may be helpful to read them In
conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment.
When enswerlng these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types
of ectlvltles likely to result from the propos.I, would affect the Item at a greater
Intensity or at a faster rate than If the proposal _re not Implemented. Respond
briefly and In general terms~ .
How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of
noise?
Not at all
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/A
2. How would the proposal be likely to effect plants, animals, fish,.or marine life?
No impact
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish. or marine life are:
N/A
,. . How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not at all
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natura! resources are:
N/A
~, How would the proposal be likely to use or effect environmentally sensitive areas
or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection: such
.. as parks. wildemess. wild and scenIc rIveN. threatened or endangered species
habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
,.', ' ,
Not at all " "
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce Impacts are:
N/A
-11-
---'-.
s. How would ·the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use. Including
whether It would ellow or encourage land or shoreline uses Incompatible with
exIsting plans?
6.
Not.applicable
Proposed moasures to avoid or reduce shorelino and land use impacts are:
Not applicable
How would the proposal be llkoly to Increase demands on transportation or public
services and utiUtics?
Renton Police and Fire protection instead of King County Sheriff Dept.
and Spring G1'en Fire Dept.
Proposed measureS to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:.
Not applicable '.
7. Identify. If possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state'. or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None known
SIGNATURE
. I. the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above Information Is
true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may wIthdraw any
declaration of non-sIgnificance that It might Issue In reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part. ~
Proponent: "lUivYklCL~' t
Name Printed:. H. J. Ramirez c:
~.
-!---
-I') -
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM D I Dill NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 7SiII ANNEXATION PETITION
TO. Buhdl~ ~ Zonl~
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM. Policy Development Department
Parks ~ Recreation
Police
Public Works OtheM, _______ _
SUBJECT. CNl11fINEA C411toAJ111W AMexation
I~';."..:. • ~ ... r~
AI ... I..
Date Circulated jpl,131/84 Date Comments Due IIIJ..I~]
Information:
Areal tlJG:.bfl Acres Street Le~th:t 3/$() Feet
Assessed Value (1984..): $"5~t{#O Estimated Population: -0-
CUrrent Uses: e..C.l:A..A
l"Ol!p ..... iID~
a....J. ~AII. pL...d:o~ t:o..tt&l",~e
Future Use,.$imiLa.-= ~O -N.... kl·.d-;~ LlIAS
Future Homes: -Future ---
/'
Reviewing Department:_=8J-J~_e_t_ .. SL-________ _
1. "Does this annexation represent any unique problems lor your department?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent 8 logical extension of services provided by
your depart ment?
'!~S
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
New f<.U:l,'heJ cu'-I\ 1\e.J. 1. ~e d(."d'fiP,t
4. can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
NO
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? Of an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please Illustrate It on the attached map.)
AI,··\t\G ~a.J(olo'\,. t( ~q,v" ... l'J..
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexaUon:
'A""e>-ot-Hav\. l ) R.ec..o<-."""o~.&J
/}j}J(Jh §""r::::a;r.tu*,,"~~="""-...t....t.-'-_.<o:.~:=:' :::::::::::::::::::_Da.t.e _' 1_.1.1 3_.1 3'_/ __ ....
'. -./
, , (, .-
, e_ --
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM o lOll NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 7511 ANNEXATION PETITION
TO, Buhdillr ole Zonlllr
Finance
Fire
Parks ole Recreation
Pollee
Public Works
Library Otherz _______ _
FROM: Polley Development Department
SUBJECT, aNDtINEA CMlfoAtlllM' Annexation
LOCATION:
__ JiTi> "'6fA. l'Il: .. ad ~ .
~.''''--.,. ,L
Date Circulated Jp!, 131 I 8? Date Comments Due / 1131!?7
General Information:
Area: tlJG.Ofl Acres Street Lellrth:t 3/$l) Feet
Assessed Value (190& ):, $~~'fNJ Estimated Population: -c:>-
Current Uses: li.C.b",A _..J.l,.bX pL..'±b~ Co..m..buu~
Cotpo-il&:l~
Future Use:Similo.r=: ~O -H.t.. ~I·.n;~ LlaJts
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: ---
F /~ Reviewing Departmenll'_.1_'-L_J.~:!:!"" ___________ _
I
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
~ ~ ~,~. S' --.:...,
3. Does this proposed annexation represent 8 logical extension of services provided by
your department? /2.f~
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
~~ ----r.-t...i-~ ~ ..4 -L. r t:; .. 'v .
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
"'f'4' '
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? or an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please lllustrate It on the attached map.)
-.:J~-
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
,
"~ Date / I .l 1/7
§,gnature
.f.,
, ~'
ANNEXATION REVIEW PORM D 10\\1 NOTICE OP INTENT ~ 75\\1 ANNEXATION PETITION
TO. Buildi,. <Ie Zonl~
Pinanc.
Pire
Library
PROM, Policy Development Department
Parka <Ie Recreation
Polic.
Publio Worka Otherl, _______ _
SUBJECT, Cl>NTIf/NEA C/jllf'aAllllW Annexation
~J'~
Date Circulated JP1,1311 fit,
IG',n.,n-ol'lnformatioOl
Oat. Commenta Due 11131 $7
Area, t'ts;oar Acres Peet
Assessed Value (198& ): $ ~~ 1(.-0 Estimated Population. -0-
Current Uses, a,&: .. , ... 4.wl bo .. plo..d'o-'£ Cortt.,;".e
CArp.,..i)on .'
IEstimated Future Homes: -Puture
/'
Reviewing Department: I trl L I TIeS
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your depart ment?
yr;S, <J~ 4'1.G PfUi'.t:'Alft.;i 5E1L,J\o.J(P <AoO f'(lOf61r~1
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
~lrlJ e;x'ISfl~ M"'~S .wo ,4 !1M p(AIAiT'f: €fl~""'(O"-lS {f<, MQiI.i~C 8,/ I&ufl«d-
{)e,J&..oP""fJolT $4,0 Pn () PfHLry
4. can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'i55
5. Do you ravor this annexation? A revised annexation contalnl~ additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not b. approved? (If an altemat. annexation would be
preferred, please Illustrate It on the attached map.)
'Ie"
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation,
lJICJ2 . / I rz 181 -,\:::::;;~ Oat.
~lgnature I
TO.·
ANNEXATION REVIEW PORM D 10" NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75" ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdl'1l '" ZOnl'1l
Finance
Plre
Libra'Y
Parks '" Recreation
Pollee
Public I'!r,rks
Other'€&FEI!::'
FROM. Polley Development Department
. SUBJECT. C/>NTifINEA C/jIlFoAJltIW Annexation
~A .... ~~ ,111 .. 2 Z:;:f!I fJ~ "
." • L.
Date Circulated 0./ 31 / 8?, Date Comments Due / / /3/ '$7
Information: ,
Ares: tlJ.c.~" Acres Street Le'1lth.:t 31GlJ Feet
Assessed Velue (l98L): $~~'t'NI Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses. e.c.bA,1A IIJ,...J. bt.!X pL..rd:o~ l",..d-a: .. ~e
l'orp ....... iio~
Future use:SjmiLa.~ ~6 -H.,. kl'~~ LlI.aS
~ .. ,. ,t,", Future Homes: -Future ft
... -
I
Reviewing Department: __ "'-I-.Ile...,It!\-lF=-s£~.,../..!I( .. -= ______ _
1. . Doesthis annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
M"~: ">1 vl-Yl {",rw--/L. ~"-:;7" c.." r I~"-""~<L t"/!.!? do//av-.! d""",.jI ~.~ 6r~~'''''R STceL l,tL.T'-~ . / 3. Does this proposed a nexati n re resent 8 logical extension f servic provided by
your depart ment?
ye.-:'
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
Alri2...a,. u-)', i \ b'C. ""-.:: • .<.::,~ ... -V}<:..~ b,' Rxl'::; r 5t·.f1
4. Can this 8n~exat~on b.e served by your ,department y.'ithin lour curre~t budget ,resources~
041'T ~ 'f S-'., .. r J...;J-").../1" ,.z,;t. t-P, ..... ,I-/ 0-' (., tt.1~ J_,p-r&>,e 1' ........... ..0.... ~
/"-.pos ;
5. Do you favor thisannexation? A revIsed annexatlon containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
p.rererred, please illustrate It on the atta.hed map.)
Av...v-.,e.:x a+;;,..., IS -I'-aJ,yy"J. .
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexaUom
Re. (,...!;:,\.-t.-t, I-~..., .c.,._ ...... d Co '-I CtA..--N"--~,,............~e ) • .1, +L, "" 'n.. "'<x J ,;"-,
,
~ r. ~;'t" . ~ Date c.. / :s-/BZ
SIgnature
. .
". (
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM D IO~ NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75~ ANNEXATION PETITION
TO. Buhdirqr 6t Zonirqr
Finance
Fire
Parks 6t Recreation
Police
Public Works
Library Other./leS!6N fNtSl/lFfRINS'
FROM. Policy Development Department
SUBJECT. Cf>N71IINEA. C/Jlll'oAtfllW Annexation
rrIL~OI~'vfi ... 1crnu"~;;~;h~~~ nna~
~A'" .......... ft.I .. L
~J
Date Circulated 1;).131 184
IO,en,:rallnformation:
Date Comments Due 11131 $7
Area. 't Ifs:oar Acres Street Lerqrth.:t .!JIGD Feet
Assessed Value (l98~. $'(,5~f(4!O Estimated Population: -0-
CUrrent Uses. a,b .. , ... 4.4 bOt( pJ.. .. +~-€ eo"h,,;,, ....
Corp ..... ilon
Future use.,sjmi f,.. .. -10 -H.a klOCi"J usA s
Future Homes. -Future DM,,'.tlM. -
I
Reviewing Department:, __ 'I:£w:!!il ... S,;;a, .. /:.JC::IIA...!AJ~:..-______ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
3.
2.
4.
5.
ii
91--v
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? y~
How will your department service this annexation area? rJ.J~
can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources? yk=
Do you ravor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (It an altemate annexation would be
preferred, please Illustrate it on the attached map.)
)-~
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMr.tENDATION on this annexation:
6>. tf'-;{
"~,.,,," .'
TO,
, -
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
0109& NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 759& ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdirv «ZOnirv
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks « Recreation
Police
Publio Works Other:, _______ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT, Cf>NTtlINEA ClJllbAHlIIJI{ Annexation
Date Circulated /.;1. / 3/ / fit, Date Comments Due / / /31117
IG,m.rallnformatlon:
Ar.a: t.1f.s:OI' Acres Street Lervth:t .!/GD Feet
Assessed Value (I9SL>: $~5~f(M:J Estimated PopulaUon, -~-
Current Use., a,b .. , ..... .4 bolt plo..a~'E' lc...rt..;".e
Chrp .... i\on ','
Future Use,Sjmi 1.. .. ;'0 -H..,. kl·.d;~ II a,R, S
Future Homes: -Puture D, ",.tI,
Reviewing Department: 2 tOU ,\l' ,.
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems l"or your department?
~)O
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
~-C ,.)"1:::::::7,
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
bUIl.DI (\)(0 peR.\i)ir1S,ZOI\)II\..)G \ U\i\J0 \.,:r;( INYO,
4. Cen this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources!
~E-:?,
S. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? or an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please Illustrate it on the attached map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
R'(LO\YlI11(I\JO I'\llJrLlGjA1101V q J\.I....G P!\OPEP,i(
fJ\2, KC.WIUEO 10 Wf\.)f'C1c..\'Y)Alvc( W iTli rf1(
Clll":? 6or",PK~ \-\'2I\)Sll/c \1.-I:"'I\},
. :m:' =~---_'",~;...1,-,1-E'"",!-'-'\""""'!\"'7/\'(-r-l-' -'--'" \' 'A""-,-V\,,,.d~ __ D.te r..,~ature \\
/ / .2 / [37,
" -"
-.~
,
/ J,
TO:
~ " , -' ,.
ANNBXA110N REVIEW PORIo
010'11 NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75'11 ANNEXATION PETITION
BuhdlOV & Zoning
Pin.nce
Fire
Llbrery
P.rks & Recre.tlon
Pollee
Public Works Othe .. , _______ _
FROM: Polley Development Dep.rtment
SUBJECT: C!>N7IfINEA C/j81'oA1RI4I'I Annex.tlon
Date Clrcul.ted jpl.1311 fl{, D.ta Comments Due I tl31 '37
IOen"rallnformatlon:
Area: t'tS;OI' Acres Street Length,t !JIGtJ Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $~5~'f4tO Estimated Population: -0-
CUrrent Uses. at.l::",A Ad bolt p)..a.,..~ Crud-..... ,..
C ... rp ..... iJo""'
Im.ted Futura -Future -,.
Reviewing Dep.rtment: __ 1?> ..... O&(..""'!!.lI~_~(i,=· ________ _
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department? No
3. Does thls proposed .nnexatlon represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? "-i"EO'S
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation .rea? SA",,<£ .-.0
J'a..o.~A.wC-<:iiii: <OF "-,-"
4. Can thls annexation be served by your depertment within your current budget resources?
<-fe'S
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend th.t this .nnexation not be approved? Of an alternate annexation would be
preferred, ple.se illustrate It on the att.chad map.)
yeS
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on thls annexation:
~"-"---x::::'
'2 ( -, C d. Date L I 2...1 14'
~~ra
V-
., ... ,
"~"'~"li-"'-"'" •
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM o 10 !II NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75!11 ANNEXATION PETITION
Bulidlrv ole Zon/rv
Finance
Fir.
Library
Parks &, ReC!reation
Polle. l;1I T U~ RENTON
PublIc Works Oth.r: _______ ....::JAN, iS37
FROM. PolIcy DeveloRment D.partment POLICY
DfVF.lnPM~NT n~PT
SUBJECT. C(>/llTlfINEA CfjllftoAtllldll Annexation
,v'"',, i1ON!lI _ .. W.. ..."*' '_"'1i6Ad ~
~AA .~"ID ".,-,J.,
Date Circulated p 131 184 Oat. Comm.nts Du. /ll3.I'a.2
Information:
Area: t.1J&:~. Acres Stre.t L.rvth.:t !JISD F •• t
Assess.d Value 098.1.J: $~~f{.", Estimat.d Population: -p-
Current Us.s: ti..c.'=4.,.A. tJ,.....I. ~QW. pl....d:., .. ~ (",..tt..lalte
C<lli~p.-.il .. ~
Futur. us.:Simi la.r! ~O -II.... kl·.ni~I.IIR. s
"""m.''''' Future Hom.s. -Future ---
R.vi.wlng D.partm.nll_-If-l'uNtIJ!A.uMIJCIloo!lli".'L-_______ _
I~
3.
2.
4.
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department? NO ---Does this proposed annexation represent a logiC!sl extension of serviC!es provided by
your d.partm.nt? YES -
How will your depart ment serviC!e this annexation area?
Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'ICS-
Do you favor this ann.Kation? A revis.d anneKation contalnlrv additional prop.rtles? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? Of 8n alternate annexation would be
preferred, please mustrate It on the attach.d map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this ann •• ation,
((pP{LoVtZ
TO:
,!"" --, ,
ANNI!XATION RI!VII!W FORM o ID!I> NOTICI! OF INTENT ~ 75!1> ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdl'lr clc Zonl'lr
Finance
Fire
Library
<;", U~ RENTON
ISS! Parks clc Reereation
Pollee
Publle Works POUCY
Other:, ________ "'pfVElOPMf.NT nFPT
FROM: Polley Development Department
SUBJECT, C4NTtlINEA QIlPoAtflI4d Annexation
Date Clreulaied JPl, 131 1St.. Date Comments Due / {/3 { '$ 7
IO"nerallnformetlon:
Aree: t Its: DI' Aeres Feet
Assessed Value (198& h $ ~5~ ,.,." Estimated Populetiom -c:>-
Current UseSl a,b .. ,. 4..4 box pJ...ao.'£ Co..rt.l".,..
C ... rp .... ilon .
Future -Future -
Reviewing Depertmenh __ e,--"QIO£,;L.!!e.~I ... C .... £ .. · L_ ______ _
1.
3.
2.
4.
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department!
/i/o
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? (.../ 7...P.2-
How will your depart ment service this annexation are~~ ,.., /,-.
a-£'/~-r,c> ~t"Ck!-o
can thiS. annexation be served by your department within your C~~Udget resources!
00 you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
reeommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attaehed map.) (/ ' 1 .--e.-:::Z-
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation, .
~''''''''/
Date /2 { 311 cfC
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
01011> NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 7511> ANNEXATION PETITION
TO. Buhdlng & Zoning
, Finance
Fire
Parks & Recreation
PoHce
PubHc Works
Library Otherl, _______ _
FROM. PoHcy Development Department
SUBJECT. C(>HTlfINEA C48f'toA11llW Annexation
IN,1 r.lll IF'6A. 1tt ...... d :J.J ' ... '
~AA .IAA'" .,. ,L
Date Circulated Jf),13118?, Date Comments Due / llJ./~:Z
Information:
Area: t 1J&'.t:iW Acres SlI'eet Length:! 31GtJ Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $"~f{.", Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: &c.b4.1 4 I/IJ...J. ~blt. pJ....",+ O~ CIllo..m..:B~e
l"1lI rp. eo-ilc:u~~
Future use,Simi/"e 10 -H.... Adl'di~ UI.D.S
~.tlm.t'" Future Homes: -Future P~~ulat I, ---
Reviewing Department: L I Be "'2."
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
Ale?
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
•
f~$
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
W/f/1 ei-lsf';'fI Fa.c-:t'l,es
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
~$
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? Of an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please Illustrate It on the attached map.)
htv!>., Al1he.".4..ftC·~
:!EPARTMENTAL RECOillMENDATION on this annexaUon:
.'.r::::::T.~:=--" "--_,,0_:::;.2-=ei..:.'''''_'kt...:.i-==-' _____ Date <2 I J,{h I 19 S 7
'~Ignature
t Jib'
EXHIBIT NO.8
Review of Municipal Services
GOVERNMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS
Renton has a mayor-council form of government which operates under the
provisions of the Optional Municipal Code. The Council consists of seven
members, elected city-wide, who are responsible for establishing policy,
appropriating funds and other legislative duties. The mayor is the chief
executive and is responsible for the overall administration and enforcement of
policy. The various departments, which are responsible for specific
functional areas, report to and are responsible to the Mayor.
The Mayor and the City Council are responsible to the citizens of the
community in meeting day-to-day problems as well as planning for the future.
The responsiveness of the Mayor and Council is illustrated to some degree in
the proposed annexation.
Citizen participation in local government in the City of Renton is further
illustrated by the list of citizen boards and commissions that residents serve
on as noted below:
Board of Adjustment
Board of Ethics
Fire Civil Service Commission
Housing Authority
Human Rights and Affairs Commission
Library Board
Renton Horizons Committee
Mayor's Youth Guidance Committee
Municipal Arts Commission
Park Board
Planning Commission
Police Civil Service Commission
Senior Citizens Planning Committee
The close proximity of City Hall to the residents also results in more
immediate response from those concerned city departments and city officials.
PUBLIC SAFETY
The proposed annexation is presently serviced by King County Fire District
1140. It will have a negligible effect on the district's financial condition
or fire suppression activity. Upon annexation, the Renton Fire Department
will provide fire service through Station 1111 located at South Second Street
and Mill Avenue South. The City of Renton has been granted the fire
protection class of "5" which provides very reasonable insurance rates.
Exhibit No. 8
Review of Municipal Services
Page 2
The Renton Police Department, located in City Hall at 200 Mill Avenue South,
will assume police service upon annexation. King County Department of Public
Safety presently serves the subject area, together with a much larger region
extending from 1-90 to the Pierce County line. Both city fire and police
departments anticipate being able to serve the annexation area.
The 911 emergency telephone number would be available to the residents of the
annexation for police, fire, and aid car services. The annexation area would
also be regulated by various city safety codes, such as building, fire,
dangerous buildings, etc.
FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS
A comparison of the county and city real estate tax structure as they would
apply before and after annexation are presented below:
COMPARISON OF 1987 MILEAGE RATES
FOR
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA ANNEXATION
Taxing District
state School Fund
King County
Port of Seattle
Emergency Medical Services
Renton School District #403
Hospital District #1
King County Roads
City of Renton
Fire District #40
Rural Library District
Total:
Water
Electricity
Natural Gas
Telephone/Telegraph
Cable TV
City (Code 2110)
3.78389
1.83959
.40813
.25000
2.28851
.23723
3.96567
12.77302
UTILITY TAX RATES
County (Code 4175)
3.78389
1.83959
.40813
.25000
2.28851
.23723
1.58324
1.50000
.50000
12.39059
5% of total monthly bill
5% of total monthly bill
5% of total monthly bill
5% of total monthly bill
5% of total monthly bill
Exhibit No. 8
Review of Municipal Services
Page 3
As noted in the above comparative tables, a slight increase in mileage rates
and subsequent property taxes is anticipated with annexation.
SOURCE:
2471G
King County Department
of Assessments
PREPARED BY:
City of Renton
Policy Development Department
February, 1987
-.~
'-
j
1his f0111\. nust be [il1<...'(1 out in triplicate and all s~
plerrcnt.lry O::lCl.m!llts Ilust be in tripliCiltc with the
exceptioo of tI\C Special PopulatiCll Census SdlCdules.
Wllrn-: -O[fim of f'in.:mcial M.:ln.lqell'l!r\t
CJ\NAKi -D.::part.nl!nt of lli<Jhw.lYS
PlNK -To be returned to City or TQ.m after approval
2.
3. ,
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
t
ANNEXATION CERTIFICATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Policy Analysis & For~casting Division
Insurance Building, M.S. AQ-44
Olympia, W A 9.8504-0201
READ CARF:FULLY 'rUE EXI'LAUATORY NOTE
BEFORE FILLING OUT TillS ClmTIFICAT~
NJI'E:. 'lhe follo. ... inq infonraticn is l"IeC:Ie:!:iSary ar.d n1-1st ~ enclosnd t"x.,fOl'C the annex.:ILion can-be p~sscd (ROI 35.13.260):
a. 'Jhe tl!ltee copies of the ~ticn Ct.'t'tihcatc should Ix! fi llt:!d out and ~ 19l:cd.
b. Tlllt.ee copies of the rP.:levant ORDINr..t'(L ccnt.iUnl.n<J U\e It!q<l.l d. ... scription of UK' anne>ed territory.
c. Th.ou!t "MI'J'S of the anne~ area. The 1lla(JS should runfonn to ac.."Ce!Jtabll:' ffiqinccring standards, including directional
arrcw, sCAle, prcpcrly designated streets, highways, mllrcmd5, ri~rs. LlocJ~~. and other physical dlaracteristics
relevant to the territory and bolZldanes of the anncxc..>d area as well a."l f!xistinq municipal limits with the area
~ outlined in red. The r.,ap shall be on an S"" X 11" ~!l(:ct or folded to tl'.dt; size.
d. One a:py of the ~ial Population 0!ns1,U Schedules used to !.!nl.F'f:'rate t.~ populaLion of the annexed area.
Was a Bour.dary Review Board or Annexation Review Board hearing held? No Date ............. ..
b ? .4 .... 0 ... 8 ... 6 ........•... • ... " .. Ordinance Num er .............. .
According to what statute (s) was this annexation accomplished? ......... R(;W ... J.~.A,.14 .... I .. a.o. ............ .
When was this ordinance passed ? .. : ............ , ....... ;;~.~'!:~.I11Bgr.,~.L,.·J9.a}.' ..
When was this ordinance published? ............. ~~P..~~I11~~.r. .. 2.5.! ... 1.~8!../ ................... .
How many days after publication did this ordinance become effective? ............... ~ ........................... .
On what date did this annexation become part of the municipality?S.~P.~E!!l1.~.~t.~:():, ... J.~?? .. '..
Area of this annexation in acres?: ......... ~ ... ~.~ .. :.2~ .. ~~.r."l~ .......
How many housing units, including vacant units were existent in the annexed area on the date
. . b t f th .. l't? u • thIs terrItory ecame a par 0 e mumclpa I y ......................................... .
11. How many housing units in the annexed area were occupied on the date this territory became a
. f h .. l't? O· part 0 t e mumclpa I y ....................................................... .
12. Population of annexed area on the date this territory became a part of the municipality? (Number
of residents determined by actual count) ................ .0... . .......................... .
cefiniticns and procedures in census taking, as set forth by the Office of Financial Managenent, nnlSt be foll~.
Special Populatioo Census Sdledules and EnwnVlit.tM'. MOlItual.! are available 0'1 request.
I hereby certify that, to effect the above
'Ln1lexation, all legal requirements have been
satisfied, and that the data set forth in this
certificate, including the attached documents, aTe
true and correct. 6 ,,'''''''.'''.\'~ .. \'':\·~.H-•. I'I~(/III •
(Signed ),/·~~.J~~~:'it~~~~S5~,Wc~
. ' " ~ , Mal/cW-!') "0,
r ..... • ,
: "r Bate)0o 7.::.,t..::r.\. ISEALJ
\...;"'>. \~ :~_-~J .e-. ~ ~j .~
Attest(.7), "<:: .. ' .... t.: j..?/~'1? (~
City (·Town.) Clerk::-
Date received .
Certificate
" .. ·Date.(C~.:(c:.~Z .......... -.... Remarks ... .
" ....... : ;: ! ; .. : C~· ~CLtbO" Pdpe." "udtd • 00 Not Se.pa.ut:e FolUIt
"', ,.,'
Revised
OFFICE RECORD
Form 170.1
•
f·'
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON ANNEXIN9_C_ERTAIN_TERRI.T.oRY_TO_~E
CI,T,Y_ .. OF~RENTON~CONTAINER'.: .CqR.I'!ORA.TION .. ~ ~E;RICA .(Adl.o.6...a ~. , .
WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.l20, as amended,
a petition in writing requesting that certain territory
contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City of
Renton on or about February 26, 1986, and
WHEREAS prior to the filing and circulation of said petition
for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners
notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, and as more particularly
specified in RCW 35.13.125 and upon public hearing thereon, it
having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed
to assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of
Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed;
and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it
pertains to the territory including the applicable zoning code
relating thereto, and
WHEREAS the Policy Development Department has examined and
verified the signatures on the petition for annexations and
determined the assessed valuation of all the properties, the same
being in excess of seventy-five percent (75%) of the area to be
annexed in value, as provided by law and the petition also
1
00
'I o
CD
N
V1 o
00
00
0'>
.'
,
I
I ~ ~
i
I "
I
j
I
I
! ,
I
I
i
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
(,,'
\..:
setting forth the legal description of the property according to
government legal subdivision or plat and the Policy Development
Department of the City of Renton having considered and
recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Rentonl
and
WHEREAS the City Council fixed February 9, 1987 at 8:00 P.M.
as the time and place for publ ic hear ing in the City Council
Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and
notice thereof having been given as provided by law, and
WHEREAS pur suan t to said notice a public hear ing has been
held at the time and place specified in the notice and the
Counc i1 having considered all matters in connection with the
petition and further determined that all legal requirements and
procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for
,
annexation as specified in RCW 35.13.130 et seq ha've been
complied with, and
WHEREAS a "Notice of Intention" having been filed with the
King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and the
Boundary Review Board having waived its jurisdiction as per its
letter dated July 30, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The findings, recitals and determinations are
hereby found to be true and correct in all respectsl all
requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35.13.125, 130, 140, 150
and Chapter 189, Session Laws of 1967 have been complied with.
2
()O
'oJ o
I.D
N
U1 o
()O
()O
en
,~
~1P
.'
~
'IF
"
"
;"
" ;., ,
,
1
:1
'"
;
~ of ,
~ 1 1
~ r
• ,is
;
~,
, , ,
"
;): ,
j-/
{
~ ," ~i
,
1\ ~
"
"
"-
:".
( ('
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the
City of Renton of the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit "An attached hereto and made a
part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
and the owners-petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-
existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed
in RCW 35.13.126 as it pertains to the property, and the property
to be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
" . passage, approval and five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the
King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise
provided by law •
SECTION III: The annexed proper ty, con tiguous to Precinct
No. __ 1::..=.1_-::;.9::;5 _____ of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a
part of the Precinct No. ~1~1~-~9~5~ ____ of said City.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of September,
1987.
Maxine E. Motor, Ci~y Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of September,
1987. _
~CA?lbtpr/U ~ • c;Q..I.~~ ~
Barbara Y.hinpocl'l; Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Lawrence J. Warr City Attorney
Date of Publication: September 25, 1987
CITY: 8/31/87/nd
3
00 .....
C>
..0
N
IJ1
C>
00
00
O'l
I I
J
, , .
•
"
\~. \~ ·D'"r ~~ . d
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
E X H I BIT nAn
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Description
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And Of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 2) North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
'Established 5-25-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the northerly Right-of-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the existing City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances ~o. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line and
northeasterly line of Northern Pacific Railway Main Line through the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast Quarter of said Section 23
and through the Southeast Quarter of ,Section 14 to the thread of the Black
River (the former limits of the City of Tukwila) and the existing limits of the
City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4040;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to the
centerline Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. l43rd
st.), also being the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under Ordinance
No. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said existing City of Renton limits
to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along said City limits, said line also being the west
Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 24 to the point of beginning.
,1.11-8 05/15/B7
I ,.
I "
\
!
"
I:
I ' ,
I
I
i
i
i
i ,
I .
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I.
•
WNTA::~e~ a>p.p
, ... ',:. OF A~ra.\dl'
AHt--4~)tAllot--\
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
Y~N'" fv\AP
~~--t-------·--.... ",-
I
I ~~~I~j~~~ \' i ~ _'>,-__ \~ ___ ./{, ___ • __ --"-"-'. .... --11
'---
-----.......
"--------t-
METRf \;;:.
. I \\ --------+~--.~~--
I ...
DIS P 0 5 AI L \ I \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i--
I
-o
1.0
N
Vl o
00
00
0'>
..\'t
..
. t\~ .' ~ ,.
, !:
.-,~
.-,.~ ,.
.}'", .
~;:
t""", \l:.'
,~.;
:",-
~r ..... ,\
~:' .
' ..
:
;
\.
, '"
•
I I • • ..
.,-, ','
I """ , I. .~". • ..
4/G . { z.
4v\'<4 y. ~-L..I-l
(~/? .$Ix
':Jf~'f~:*P4---f -----~ ----
" I
\
4 '\
\
_'c---'.. ~-,-----Hr---___ ,",,",,~', . ....j,_
-----~ --. -...... \
\
\
\
METRt. . ,.\'
. t, ~ -----~ I ---.-:-C
I 5 P 0 5 AI L \ I . '\
I
, .
..,
-,.: i
I ·u « I III I f-
I u I « I 01. I
~'lo_· I
SPEC IAL.OPULATION CENSU
SUMMARY SHEET
STATE OF WASHINGTON
*TOTAL POPULATION 0
( Lines A + 1-B + ""2 _-'B.-'7+....,C'"')--
CITY OR TOWN __ Re_n_t_o_n _____ _
UNITS PER STRUCTURE III III (II I" II' 16' \71
TOTAL VACANT OCCUPIEO AV. POP. "CCUPANCY VACANCY EXCLUDE HOUS ING HOUS I NG HOUS NG POP-PER H.U. RAn RATE MOBILE ~OMES/TRAILERS UNITS UNITS UNITS UUlTION I"~'II'III 111;\11' '61 121 ; I'" 171
I-A I IINIT STRUCTURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2-A ] UNIT STRUCTURES 0
3-A 1 UNIT STRUCTURES 0
4-A I, UNIT STRUCTURES 0
~ -A 5 OR MORE UNITS 0
A.TOTAlS * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
III III Inrr~~l~~ '" AV.'IJop. ~crl~~~ .. rv
,71
TOTAL VACANT POP-VACANCY SECTION B H3~H~G HooS ING IVH~~~TS PER H.U. RAT£ RATE
UNITS UUlTION ",+"",1' 111;\11'161 1121""'171
* MOBILE HOMES/
1-B TRAILERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12-B SPECIAL** 0 0 :* 0 0
··Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a houstng unit
(e.g., boats. boxcars, tents, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meetin9
"resident" criteria. S~ec1fy type of housing. .
GROU P QUARTERS
I l NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOMES
2·r. COLLEGE DORMITORIES
3 l MENTAL & PENAL. INSTITUTIONS
4-r. MIL ITARY I NSTALUIT IONS
SoC OTHER:
C.TOTAL GIOUft QUAnEU
COMMENTS
'_' OFFICE LOCATION OF CITY/TOWN CLERK OR
CENSUS ADMINISTRATOR: 200 Mill Aves.
Renton. WA 98055
OAYS/HOURS OF OPERATION: 8-5, ~l-F
(Revised 2/86) OFM P-IlO.2
NUMBER OF' POPUUlTION
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
*
0 0
ATTEST:~ini g ~ /0 -7-4'7
011 C ) OR (bATE)
CENSUS ADMINISTRATORI
( ("
EilUMERATlON DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET -i
POPULATION BY UNIT TYPE HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE 'VACANT UNITS BY TYPE
'"
I
on V> V> '''' W UNITS ... UNITS I-UNITS I-'w '" ~-~--'-'" :.: «z «z «z
!5 => IN I-=> o~ IN I-=> 0-' IN I-=> C-'
Z 0 z< e z< 0 ~~ Z I-"' ~:; I-"' ~:; I-"' '" STRUCTURE '" STRUCTURE '" STRUCTURE '" ci u =>0 '" I-=>0
MIl/T SPECiGQ
'" I-=>0 '" .... e "'~ GQ
on ~ 2 V> ~
...; -' 1 2 3 4 5+ MIl/T SPEC 1 2 3 4 5+ 1 3 4 5+ MIlIT SPEC GQ
'"
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :::::::: 0
::::::::
.' ::::::::
::::::::
.,:~"!: =:=:=:=:
~] :::::::: : ..
::::::::
~. ::::::::
:::::::
'. ::::::::
::::::::
.~~ ::::::::
::::::::
:::::::: 0°0
~::::::: :::::::: ~
~:§" :::::::: .
, ::::::::
::::::: .......
,'. :::::::
::~~ ::::::: .:.
':::::~ -::::::: ~ .... ::::::::
::::::::
::::::::
::::::::
'" :::::::: .~
'.' :-.':':' :::::::: ~~3"
:~:::: :::::::: :~l.
::~::: :::::::: :~:~::'
I :~:l::: :::~:
::::::: ~::::::
j ~~1~~ ~t.i ........
(Revised 2/86) (\;'101 0_120.3
'~
.;-..... ~
SPECIAL , ..IPULATION CENSUS So IEDULE
Y •• r, __ -,,1,,-98,,-7,--
OFFICE, OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
POUCV ANAL VSIS & FORECASTING DIVISION
City/Town, __ ---'R"'e"'oLLtj.JOI./JOLL __
STATE OF WASHINGTON
E.D./Tract No._=2",5",,9_
Block No ._,.-----
Page No .1.
LINE
NO.
--L
--L
-L
.-!.
-2..
i
...L
.--B...
.....2..
.J.Q.
-1l
.J1.
.J1.
..1!
--li
J.li
JL
..l§.
--li.
20 -=.:..
') 1 ~
R
..ll
~
~5
On. EntJuj Ooiy Enumerator Ca rrl e I r;
I , 3 • 5 6 .. 2 • IlRECT APT .-HOOSING HUMB[R Of MOBILE NAME Of EACH PERSON W'IOSE USUAL PLACE Of ABODE ON THE LINE DR HOUSE ADDRESS NO. UNIT UNITS IN HOME/ SPEC. * OAT[ Of EIIUM£RA11('\fl WAS (N THIS HOUSI:HOlO NO. ROAD SEQ. NO. STRUCTURE IrRAILER (f"tCA L46t NUit ~iUtl
MH/T Spec. 1
MHiT Spec. NO RESIDENCES WITHIN THIS ANNEXATION 2
MH/T Spec. AREA ]
MHiT Spec . 4
MH/T Spec. 5
MH/T . Spec. 6
MHiT Spec. 7
MH/T Spec . 8
MH/T Spec. 9
MH/T Spec . 10
MHiT Spec. 11
MH/T Spec. 12
MH/T Spec . 13
MH/T Spec . 14
MHiT Spec. 15
MH/T Spec. 16
MHiT Spec. 17
MH/T Spec. 18
MH/T Spec. 19
MH/T Spec. 20
MH/T Spec. 21
HH/T Spec. 22
MH/T Spec. 23
MH/T Spec. 24
MH/T Spec. 25
PAGE TOTALS
persons ___ O ___ _ * Each housing unit in structures haYing only one house address,
but more than one unit, should be separately identified by the
letter or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. Total Housing Units_~O_ .
• * Special Housing: Unusual liYing quarters not generally considered
a housing unit (e.g., boats. boxcars. tents. etc.). Only counted
when occupied by person meeting "resident" criteria. Specify
type of housing.
Vacant Units, ___ -!O~-
Occupied units ___ O",-_
(Revised 2/86) OFM P-120.1
mn~l'
-
';-', .....
HH
# 1
o-
*PAGE
TOTAL
*BLOCK
TOTAL
rlLOCK SUMMARY SHEET
TABULATION OF POPULATION
BY STRUCTURE TYPE
NO RESIDENCES WITHIN THIS ANNEXATION AREA.
UN IT TYPE HH
2 3 4 5+ MII/T SPEC. GO # 1
f--
POPULATION TOTAL . · · . · 0 ·
HOUSING UNIT TOTAL · · 0 .
VACANCY TOTAL . . · 0 · · :;
POPULATION TOTAL · . 0 ·
HOUSING UNIT TOTAL . · . · · 0
VACANCY TOTAL . · . 0
* Use Block Total If Block Needs More Than One Page
Ly/County Renton
E .D. ~ Block ,-__
~age ~ Of I
UNIT TYPE
2 3 4 5+ MH/T SPEC. GO
-
..
(Revised 2/86) OFM P-J20.4
J I,
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 4096
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY
OF RENTON FROM_GENERAL-CLASS-I-FICA-TION-(-G-l-)-TO-MANUFACTURING
PARK (M-P) <:JCONTAINER CORP.ORAT-ION---R,,-02l::..8_6J >
~
WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has
heretofore been zoned as General Classification (G-l); and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification
of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning
Department on or about March 7, 1986, which petition was duly
referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and
publ ic hear ing and a publ ic hear ing hav ing been held thereon on
or about January 20, 1987 and subsequent hearings having been
held before the Renton City Council on February 9, 1987, March 2,
1987 and September 21, 1987, and said matter having been duly
considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being
in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and
the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant
thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support
thereof or in oppOSition thereto, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The following described property in the City of
Renton is hereby rezoned to Manufacturing Park (M-P) as
hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and
',.
ORDINANCE NO. 4096
decision of the Hearing Examiner dated January 29, 1987: the
Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to
change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence.
said rezoning, to-wit:
See Exhibit "An attached hereto and made a part hereof
as if fully set forth herein
(Said property being located on the West side of
Monster Road S.W. at the 600-1100 Block)
SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of November,
1987.
~e~
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of November, 1987.
~~~1t i~~;~Pe;y~
Approved as to form:
Lawrece J. arr~ry Aftorney
Date of Publication: November 20, 1987
CITY3:30/9/28/87/nd
-2-
'.
ORDINANCE NO. 4096 (
E X H I BIT "A"
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Oescription
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follriws:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-25-31, or County Rd. NO.8) with the northerly Right-of-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the existing City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line and
northeasterly line of Northern Pacific Railway Main Line through the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast Quarter of said Section 23
and through the Southeast Quarter of ·Section 14 to the thread of the Black
River (the former limits of the City of Tukwila) and the existing limits of the
City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4040;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to the
centerline Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. 143rd
St.), also being the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under Ordinance
No. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said existing City of Renton limits
to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along said City limits, said line also being the West
Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 24 to the point of beginning.
Fl.ll-B 05/15/87
•.
. ,
:'"
.,
•
..
I
I
I
I
:-------H;--------:::,;,--:::._ --l-_
\
, MET R h \ ... r \~
--------L----~'.0--
I . I.
i) I 5 P 0 5 AI L \
I \
I
!i
U
<i
Q1
I-
u
<i
01.
• -.!'.~--.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,--
I
I
I
..
/ " "
',\ November 9. 1987
Rezone: Container
Corporation,R-02.J.-86
Rezone: Leitzke
Architects, R-119-86
Vouchers
NEW BUSINESS
Trimm's Birthday
Equipment Purchase
Oakesdale Field Trip
ADJOURNMENT
Recorder: Pat Briggs
11/9/87
,. =
Renton City Council Minutes Page 373
An ordinance was read Changing the zoning classification for Container
Corporation from G-I, General Classification, to M-P, Manufacturing Park
Classification, for 45.08 acres located on the west side of Monster Road SW
(600-1100 block). MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE
WEEK. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification for Leitzke
Architects from G-I, General Classification, to R-3, Medium Density
Multifamily Residential Classification for property located in the 4300 Block
of N.E. 4th Street. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE
WEEK. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report
recommending approval of Vouchers 36380 through 36686 in the amount of
$1,381,324.05, having received departmental certification that
merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 36388 -
36399 machine voided. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY
CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
Birthday greetings were extended to Council President Trimm.
In response to Councilwoman Keolker's inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch indicated
she has reviewed letter from Craig Taylor Equipment Company concerning
purchase of equipment, and will report back to Council when matter has been
discussed with City Attorney Warren.
Councilman Stredicke commended Public Works Director for Council field
trip to view Oakesdale project and the Valley area.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL
ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:40 p.m.
MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIl,. MEETING OF--'-N"'0-'-'VE.,.M""B-"'ER"--L9 ...... -,1~9.8~7,--______ _
COMMITTEE DATE TIME
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE --
1988 BUDGET HEARINGS Tues. II/1O 7:30 p.m.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PL"'NNING & DEVELOPMENT Thurs. 11/12 4:30 p.m.
PUBLIC SAFETY
TRANSPORTATION
(AVIATION) Tues. 11/10 4:30 p.m.
UTILITIES
WAYS & MEANS Mon. 11/16 7:00 p.m.
OTHER MEETINGS & EVENTS
LEOFF Boa rd Thurs. 11/12 8:00 a.m.
CHAIRMAN
,
TRIMM
I
!
MATHEWS
STREDICKE
!
HUGHES I
REED
!
CLYMER I
I
KEOLKER
i
LOCATION
Council Chambers
Sixth Floor Conference Room
Fourth Floor Conference Room
Sixth Floor Conference Room
Sixth Floor Conference Room
---
AGENDA
See 10/12 Council Minutes
for attached Schedule
E & H Properties Development
Ai rport Budget
'\
I;'
,.
"q.~~""':--
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Date October 6, 1987
TO;
FROM;
Carrie -Policy Development
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
SUBJECT;
D
MEM:"~ gn
cc:
Container Corporation Annexation Certificate fn1 ID ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IU
lYJ' Lg6~ e 180 (f
NOlN3H ~o AlI~
lN3WIllVd30 1.~llt\l)O" '~r '""
We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above-
captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official
public records. Copies should be forwarded to
and the other for your file.
Pursuant to your memo of 9/30/87 we return herewith
document's), as above-captioned, which have been signed by
City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution
by
We return herewith recorded document(s), as above-captioned,
copy of which we have retained for our official public records.
Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained
as necessary for your files.
Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office
for our permanent records when received.
Thank you.
Enclosure (1)
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ~1J!N'b~Pt.fEM>~
Ronald Q:nt\'lol1«!mcDirector
@ SEP 29 1987 Jm
!Ill ~ (C ~ ~ \'U IE l!!J
CONTAINER CORPORATION ANNEXATION
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The following address was changed due to the upcoming
container Corporation of America annexation. The annexation
was passed by city Council on September 21, 1987.
I,· OLD ADDRESS NEW ADDRESS
7000 South 143rd Street 601 Monster Road S.W.
Sincerely,
James C. Hanson
Assistant Building Director
JCH:p1p:p1028
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2540
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON ANNEXING_CERTAIN_TERRI.TORY_TO_THE
CI.T.Y-OF-RENTON~ (CONTAINER CORPORATION ~ ~RI CA (A::.00.6.~.B6·)---'
WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended,
a petition in wr i ting requesting that cer tain territory
contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the Ci ty of Renton, was presented and filed with the Ci ty of
Renton on or about February 26, 1986, and
WHEREAS prior to the filing and circulation of said petition
for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners
notified the City Council of their intention to commenCe such
proceedings as provided by law, and as mo~e particularly
specified in RCW 35.13.125 and upon public hearing thereon, it
having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed
to assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of
Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed;
and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Planas it
pertains to the territory including the. applicable zoning code
relating thereto, and
WHEREAS the Policy Development Department has examined and
verified the signatures on the petition for annexations and
determined the assessed valuation of all the properties, the same
being in excess of seventy-five percent (75%) of the area to be
annexed in value, as provided by law and the petition also
1
00
'I o
<.D
N
IJ1 o
00
00
0'1
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
setting forth the legal description of the property according to
government legal subdivision or plat and the Policy Development
Department of the City of Renton having considered. and
recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton;
and
WHEREAS the City Council fixed February 9, 1987 at 8:00 P.M.
as the time and place for public hear ing in the City Council
Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and
notice thereof having been given as provided by law, and
WHEREAS pur suan t to said notice a publ ic hear ing has been
held at the time and place specified in the notice and the
Council having considered all matters in connection with the
petition and further determined that all legal requirements and
procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for
annexation as specified in RCW 35.13.130 et seq ha·ve been
complied with, and
WHEREAS a "Notice of Intention" having been filed with the
King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and the
Boundary Review Board having waived its jurisdiction as per its
letter dated July 30, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The findings, recitals and determinations are
hereby found to be true and correct in all respects; all
requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35.13.125, 130, 140, 150
and Chapter 189, Session Laws of 1967 have been complied with.
2
00
" a
c.D
N
V1 a
00
00
O'l
'-,
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the
City of Renton of the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a
part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
and the owners-petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-
existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed
in RCW 35.13.126 as it pertains to the property, and the property
to be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval and five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the
King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise
provided by law.
SECTION III: The annexed property, contiguous to Precinct
No. __ ~1~1~-~9~5~ ___ of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a
part of the Precinct No. ~1~1~-~9~5~ ____ of said City.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of September,
1987.
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of September,
1987.
~O>!.b@WJ ~. C;Q..I.~~~
Barbara Y .hinpoc1l; Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Lawrence J. Warr
Date of Publication: September 25, 1987
CITY: 8/3l/87/nd
3
00 ......
Cl
<.D
N
\J1
Cl
00
00 en
r-'
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
E X H I BIT "A"
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Oescription
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-25-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the 'northerly Right-of-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the existing City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line and
northeasterly line of Northern Pacific Railway Main Line through the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast Quarter of said Section 23
and through the Southeast Quarter of ,Section 14 to the thread of the Black
River (the former lImits of the City of Tukwila) and the existing lImIts of the
City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4040;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and saId City lImIts line to the
centerline Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. l43rd
St.), also being the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under OrdInance
NO. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said existIng CIty of Renton lImIts
to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along said City limits, said line also being the West
Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of saId
SectIon 24 to the poInt of beginnIng.
Fl.ll-B 05115/87
00
'-J
C>
lD
N
Ul
C>
00
00
0">
" .-•
' .
'. .
I ----:;:::::::~~ tc?~e.~ dt>rzp , "
J , . . . . DF AMIE-~\dA .: ) ..
AH~e'AA"'OI--\
ORDINANCE NO. 4086
(5/i1 !Joe YIC-jNl1J t¥P
•• •
~Ali""" .-.d~I--t-------.--
I
~~~~~~i~~~ \ .. \
~\-_\-----'If'---. \ '-----X!;:-
I
I
I
I -...-_--L-_
'-. '-----i-
u «
ri
I
00
"'-I
0
~
N
V1
0
00
00 en
...
,
7
~,
" ,
;;f
.-:-
'.
OF R~<v
~ o
'Z %.... -" -~ ~ co' "b-? «,~
.. "11"1:0 SEP"{E~~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
MEMORANDUM
\d~~~)~ a.d.tJ.At.tLA
~
! ,
'~ ,..
September 21. 1987
PUBLIC HEARING
Rezone: Container
Corporation, R-021-86
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Citizen Comment: Jett -
Hearing Examiner
Ordinance
CONSENT AGENDA
Claim: Marschke,
CL-42-87
Release of Easement:
First City Equities,
RE-002-87 (Storm),
RE-003-87 (Waterway),
Washington Technical
Center
Renton City Council Minutes Page 291
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published
in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public
hearing to consider the Container Corporation of America rezone to
Manufacturing Park (M-P) for 45.08 acres located on the west side of the 600
to 1000 blocks of Monster Road SW.
Referring to a vicinity map of the subject area, Policy Development Director
Larry Springer briefly summarized the proposal. He reported that on
1/20/87, the first of two required public hearings was held by the Hearing
Examiner for consideration of a rezone of 42 acres of the subject site. On
1/29/87, the Hearing Examiner issued a report recommending approval of the
rezone to Manufacturing Park. On 2/9/87, the City Council held the first of
two required public hearings to consider imposition of M-P zoning on the
remaining 3.08 acres of property owned by Metro, King County and
Burlington Northern Railroad Company. On the same date, the City Council
held the second of the two required public hearings to rezone the 42-acre
site, and approved M-P zoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designation of Manufacturing Park -Multiple Option, for both of the subject
areas. Mr. Springer recommended that the City Council adopt Manufacturing
Park zoning for the entire 45.08 acre site encompassed by the Container
Corporation of Amenca annexation. (See Ordmances and Resolutions for
later action.)
Audience comment was invited. Mary Anderson, 13618 SE 180th, Renton,
alerted Council to unmarked open mine shafts and severe erosion problems
due to steep slopes and bedrock on the subject site. Mr. Springer indicated
that any future development on Manufacturing Park zoned property would
require site approval and careful environmental review. Further, this
information will be added to the City's study of environmentally sensitive
areas. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM,
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
RECOMMENDA TION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER TO IMPOSE
MANUFACTURING PARK ZONING AND REFER THIS MATTER TO
THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Council members
requested that the record reflect concerns expressed by Ms. Anderson
regarding soil conditions and mine shafts to be presented to the Hearing
Examiner for future consideration of any development on the subject site.
Kathleen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, thanked City Attorney
Warren for timely written response to her questions regarding the Hearing
Examiner Ordinance on 9/14/87; and requested a copy of a memorandum
from the Hearing Examiner referenced in the Attorney's letter regarding
revision of Code Section 4-3011(B)(4). Mayor Shinpoch suggested that Mrs.
Jett contact the office of the Hearing Examiner for a copy of the letter.
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Claim for damages in the amount of $452.39 filed by Leroy Marschke, 24107
250 SE, Maple Valley, for damage incurred to personal vehicle parked at 211
Burnett Avenue N. allegedly struck by City vehicle (08/14/87). Refer to Q1y
Attorney and insurance service.
City Clerk submitted request for release of easements (storm sewer, RE-002-
87, and waterway, RE-003-87) on behalf of First City Equities for Tract B,
Washington Technical Center, located on Oakesdale A venue SW north of SW
Grady Way; petition submitted by Bush, Roed and Hitchings has been
verified by Public Works Department and represents 100% of adjacent and
vested ownership of the easements. Refer to Utilities Committee and Board
of Public Works to determine advisability of proposed easement release and
classification of easments.
September 21, 1987
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL
PRESENTATION
WSDOT: HOV Lane
Construction & Oakesdale
Avenue
Board/Commission:
Municipal Arts
Commission Selection of
Art for Community
Building
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT J.
HUGHES, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, NANCY L. MATHEWS. MOVED
BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT
COUNCIL MEMBERS KATHY A. KEOLKER AND JOHN W. REED.
CARRIED.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E.
MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY M. SPRINGER, Policy Development
Department; LT. DALE E. BAKER, Police Department
Jim McNett, Valley Daily News
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1987, AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
Mayor Shinpoch explained that R. E. Bockstruck, District Engineer for the
Washington State Department of Transportation, had requested permission to
address Council members this date regarding an exclusionary clause in the
contract for the Oakesdale Avenue SW undercrossing. WSDOT had asked that
the City agree to delete the clause which releases the City from the contract
or allows renegotiation of the contract if total actual bid prices exceed the
estimate of costs by more than 15%. Mayor Shinpoch advised that she has
signed the contract, but did not approve deletion of the exclusionary clause.
She indicated that Mr. Bockstruck would be allowed time to address Council
if he arrives later in the meeting.
Ron Ringwood, representing the I % for Art Committee, and Greg Parsons,
Chairman of the Municipal Arts Commission, addressed Council regarding
the proposed art selections for the new Community Building. A jury
consisting of I % for Art Committee members, Park Board/Department
representative, and member of the architectural firm reviewed art work
submitted by 25 candidates from Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Ultimately,
three Oregon artists were selected to do the art displays which will be placed
in three locations in the building. Renderings of the art proposals were
circulated to Mayor and Council members for review and approval. The
submissions by Kay Slusarenko are proposed for placement in the main lobby
and consist of four metal panels depicting the four seasons of change and a
single 9-foot by 9-foot pictorial map entitled "Renton .Changes." The design
by Bonnie Bronson consisting of four three-dimensional geometric shapes of
vitreous enamel material, approximately I I feet by 43 feet in size, will be
incorporated into the exterior wall of the racquetball court. Lastly, nine
metal tile sculptural seating forms crafted by Elizabeth Mapelli will be
located on the veranda facing the river outside the banquet/dance hall area.
Councilwoman Mathews asked that the Municipal Arts Commission work
closely with the Park Department to ensure consideration of safety
precautions for the seating units. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION WITH REGARD TO THE ART AT THE
COMMUNITY CENTER. CARRIED.
September 21. 1987
Court Case: First City
Developments
Corporation
CORRESPONDENCE
LID: 333, North 1st Street
U ndergrounding
Renton City Council Minutes Page 292
Court Case filed by First City Developments Corporation v. City of Renton
and Victoria Hills Homeowners' Association; Writ of Prohibition alleges that
the 9/22/87 administrative appeal hearing sought by the Homeowners'
Association would exceed the jurisdictional authority granted to the Hearing
Examiner, and the Homeowners' Association has attempted to delay
construction, cloud financing efforts and misuse City procedures to bring
construction of Victoria Hills Phase II to a halt. Refer to City Attorney.
Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren reported that the Court has
since determined that there was no clear and inarguable excessive jurisdiction
exercised by the City; and consequently refused the Writ and dismissed the
City as a defendant in the Court Case.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
Letter was read from Wyman Dobson, 821 North 1st, Renton, requesting
Council to proceed with LID 333, utility undergrounding project on N. 1st
Street, as proposed and petitioned for by the majority of the property owners
(LID terminated on 8/24/87, in response to 33% protest). Mr. Dobson
indicated his interpretation of RCW 35.44.080 that once the petition for the
LID is accepted by the City, the Council is obligated to proceed on the LID.
Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren indicated that he has discussed
the matter with Mr. Dobson and expressed his differing legal interpretation
of the law that Council has the discretionary authority to terminate an LID.
Councilwoman Mathews requested that a copy of the Council minutes
containing the City Attorney's comments be forwarded to Mr. Dobson.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means
CommIttee
Ordinance #4084
Finance: Mid-Year
Budget Adjustment
Ordinance #4085
Board/Commissions:
Board of Adjustment
Ordinance
NEW BUSINESS
Streets: Trees at Lake
Youngs Way SE and SE
16th Street
Parks: 1988 H&CD Block
Grant Program
'\
Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading:
An ordinance was read providing for a 1987 Mid-Year Budget Adjustment in
balanced amount of $5,084,966. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman
Stredicke questioned golf course funds and asked whether Council had
authorized expenditure for two television sets and a VCR from cable
communications fund. Mayor Shinpoch explained revenue adjustments and
reflection of anticipated funds from golf course property sale in the General·
Fund despite the fact that the sale has not yet occurred. Administrative
Assistant Parness clarified that the television sets were purchased to
implement government access information channel on cable TV. Upon
further inquiry by Councilwoman Mathews, Mayor Shinpoch reported that
the last of the federal revenue sharing funds was received by the City and
should be reflected in the mid-year adjustment. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES.
CARRIED.
An ordinance was read amending Section 2-902 of Title II (Commissions and
Boards) of City Code changing qualifications for Position No. I of the Board
of Adjustment to require member to be either a practicing architect or
practicing engineer, instead of restricting the position to practicing architect.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read annexing 45.08 acres of property located on the west
side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000 block to the City of Renton.
(Container Corporation of America, A-006-86). MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
Councilwoman Mathews asked that staff investigate a citizen complaint
regarding sight-obscuring trees at the intersection of Lake Youngs Way SE
and SE 16th Street.
Councilman Mathews announced that the public hearing on 9/28/87 regarding
H & CD Block Grant Program funding will include a related request from
Good Shepherd of Washington for block grant funds to develop a group home
for developmentally disabled adults.
September 21. 1987
ADMINISTRATIVE
REPORT
Utility: Mt. Olivet
Cemetery Fountain
Streets: Stop Sign at 10th
and Union
Fire: Public Safety
Facilities Expansion
Master Plan
Bond Issue Committee
Cedar River
AUDIENCE COMMENT
PUD: Final, Victoria Hills
Phase II, FPUD-042-75
Court Case: Encore
Appeal: E & H Properties
Rezone, R-016-87
Executive Session
ADJOURNMENT
Recorder: Marilyn Petersen
9/21/87
Renton City Council Minutes Page 293
In response to Council concern on 9/14/87, Mayor Shinpoch reported that
water spraying from a fountain at the entrance to Mt. Olivet Cemetery is
private water, is located on private property, and is not being wasted since it
is recycled from a pool. Councilman Stredicke expressed concern that the
spray appears to be wasteful to residents attempting to conserve water during
regional shortage.
Responding to Council report on 9/14/87, the stop sign at NE 10th Street and
Union Avenue NE has been restored.
Mayor Shinpoch has appointed Delores Mead, Pat McLendon, Greg
Anderson, and Dixon Long to serve on the citizens Public Safety Bond Issue
Committee to coordinate the campaign prior to placement on the General
Election ballot.
A landslide which occurred in King County on Sunday above Maplewood
Golf Course has clouded the water in the Cedar River. The Department of
Ecology indicates there is no danger to fish at this time; however, the City
will be informed of any change.
Jeff Lukins, 1113 S. 23rd Street, Renton, President of the Victoria Hills
Homeowners' Association, advised that hydroseeding installed by the
developer of the Victoria Hills Phase II project two weeks ago may not have
survived due to lack of irrigation. He also apprised Council that no further
erosion control measures have been provided by the developer to date, nor
has there been any construction activity on the site.
Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren reviewed status of City-initiated
court case against owners of the Encore club in the downtown area. Due to
repeated violations of the Dance Hall Ordinance regarding occupancy load
and employment of security officers, an action filed previously by the City in
King County Superior Court against the establishment has been reactivated.
Upon Council inquiry, Administrative Assistant Parness reported that revised
traffic information has been supplied to Council members by The Blaylock
Company, consultant for E & H Properties, prior to special presentation on
the E & H Rezone scheduled for 9/28/87.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONVENE'
INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY ACQUISITION.
CARRIED. Time: 9:30 p.m.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 10:53 p.m.
MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk
PRESIDING
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH,
MAYOR
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
September 21, 1987
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 21,1987
4. SPECIAL PRESENT A TIONS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
THOMAS W. TRIMM,
COUNCil PRESIDENT
EARL CLYMER
ROBERT I. HUGHES
KATHY KEOlKER
NANCY l. MATHEWS
JOHN W. REED
RICHARD M. STREDICKE
CITY CLERK
MAXINE E. MOTOR
Washington State Department of Transportation, R. E. Bockstruck, District Engineer, re Oakesdale
Avenue SW Contract
Ron Ringwood, Municipal Arts Commission, re I % Art for Community Center
5. PUBLIC HEARING: Rezone of Container Corporation of America 45.08 acres located on the west
side of the 600 to 1100 blocks of Monster Road SW
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT
At this time, any member of the audience may address the City Council to discuss a topic of concern.
Any citizen interested in a pending agenda item or Council committee report may request that the
Council advance to that item of interest. When you are recognized by the presiding officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, spelling your last name. Please
limit your remarks to no more than five minutes. .
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Council members.in advance for·study and review and will be
adopted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a
Council member.
a. Claim for Damages filed by Leroyh Marschke, 24107 250 SE, Maple Valley, in the amount of
$452.39 for damage to his vehicle, allegedly struck by City vehicle while Marschke's vehicle was-
parked (8/14/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
b. City Clerk reports request filed for release of two easements (storm sewer No. RE-002-87 and
waterway RE-Oq.3-87) on behalf of First City Equities. Refer to the Utilities Committee and
Board of Public Works to determine advisability of proposed releases and classification.
c. Superior Court Case No. 87-2-15564-1 filed by First City Developments Corp. vs City of Renton
and Victoria Hills Homeowners' Association. Refer to City Attorney ..
8. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Wyman K. Dobson requests Council to proceed with LID No. 333, undergrounding, North First
Street.
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
II. NEW BUSINESS
12. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
13. AUDIENCE COMMENT
14. ADJOURNMENT
ZONING SUMMARY
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA ANNEXATION and REZONE
Second Public Hearing -September 21, 1987
LOCATION
The area encompassed by the Container Corporation of America Annexation and Rezone
consists of 45.08 acres located on the west side the 600 to 1100 blocks of Monster Road
SW (see Figure I).
SUMMARY
The proponent of the Container Corp Annexation filed an application for concurrent
rezone of the 42 acres under their ownership to MP -Manufacturing Park. On January
20, 1987, the Renton Hearing Examiner held the first of the two required public
hearings on this rezone request. On January 29, 1987, the Hearing Examiner
recommended approval of the MP rezone. On February 9, 1987, the City Council held
the first of the two required public hearings on the imposition of MP zoning on the
remaining 3.08 acres of property owned by Metro, King County and Burlington
Northern Railroad (see Figure 2). On the same date, Council held the second of the two
required public hearings on the rezone of the 42 acres. Council concurred in both of the
MP recommendations. This zone is consistent with the subject site's Manufacturing Park
-Multiple Option designation on the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan.,
The subject site consists of a manufacturing plant for the Container Corporation of
America. This annexation was approved by the King County Boundary Review Board
on July 26, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION
The Policy Development Department advises Council to concur with the recommendation
of the 'Hearing Examiner and the February 9, 1987 public hearing and impose MP
zoning on the 45.08 acres of property encompassed by the Container Corporation of
America Annexation.
ctdsk3
cca2
.: .~
;; .
r
. ~ .. MET R
.. i:'
;:-' .
.....
~; >
..
, .
\ -.~!.--'
I.
~ ·U
~
CJl
I-
w
U
~
III
~
I
I
I
I
~-"", --.1.--_
I
r
I
• I_
I ..
I .
I
I --r:--
I
I
I I
I I I
I I
. :.\t-
...
CHI{.AC.O MllWAUKF.E
SOUTH
AREA
I , ,-----_ •....
,~, f
'~... . " I '~, I
'.:'". '
... , " .'.' ., ',' ., " , -~:-, "
I " I "., --'>' .,. , 1 " . !
!
\
" .....
\
\
~
,
----::=:.:------=--::.
CORP.
OF AMERICA
;
!
!
f
\ ",·ilflt4..ING
\
\ ,
\. ·C·-· ._._.'i!:ff.-
'" \ .'(' , . , ... " ............ ' '<-_~,..-__ ~ " ··_.H __ --
'Lt... " <i
10WER o
"
EARlfNGTON
" " ,I
" , '
I " , , , , , ,
MUN~
September 14. 1987
Community Services
Committee Report;
Social Service Funding
Requests for 1988
Renton City Council Minutes Page 285 "
Councilwoman Mathews Chairman presented a report with recommendations
for 1988 Preliminary Budget as follows:
A.DAWN
1987 Allocation: $9,000/1988 Request: $12,000
It is further recommended that DAWN's new appointed interim director
attend the budget hearings to review actual 1987 City of Renton Services.
Supporting data from the Police Department would prove helpful as well.
B. FRIENDS OF YOUTH
1987 Allocation: $5,000/1988 Request: $10,000
It is recommended Friends of Youth should continue to receive social service
funding from the City of Renton. Data supports an increased allocation.
C. KING COUNTY RAPE RELIEF
1987 Allocation: $9,000/1988 Request: $10,000
It is recommended that Rape Relief continue to receive social service
funding, the program has the highest percentage of requests from Renton out
of II contributing jurisdictions.
D. RENTON AREA YOUTH SERVICES
1987 Allocation: $32,760/1988 Request: $35,700
It is recommended RAYS continue to receive social funding from the City of
Renton. A presentation at the budget hearings to update program expansion
will prove helpful. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means
Committee
Ordinance #4083
Fire: Hazardous Materials
Incident Command
Agency
Finance: Mid-Year
Budget Adjustment
General: Amendment of
Section 2-902 of Title II
(Commissions and Boards)
or Ordinance No. 1628
General: Annexation of
certain territory to City
COf Renton ;;
Resolution #2690
Authorizing Mayor and
City Clerk to execute
documents relating to
request for Washington
State Department of
Transportation Funds
Resolution #2691
Authorizing exchange of
information with State
Department of Revenue
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report
recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading:
Ordinance was read declaring Renton Fire Department as the "Hazardous
Materials Incident Command Agency". Following second and final reading of
the aforementioned ordinance, it was MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED
BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED
An ordinance was read providing for a 1987 Mid-Year Budget Adjustment i'n
balanced amount of $5,084,966. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY
CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS &
MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read amending Section 2-902 of Title II (Commissions and
Boards) of Ordinance No. 1628 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton" relating to qualifications for Position No. I of the Board of
Adjustment. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS & MEANS
COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read annexing_certain,territory to the City of Renton.
(Container COrporation of Americ~CPR-2), MOVED BY KEOLKER,
SECONDED'BY'Cr:YMER-;-COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK
TO WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report
recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption:
A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
documents relating to request for Washington State Department of
Transportation Funds, S.W. Sunset Blvd, SR-900, from West City limits to
Rainier Avenue South. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY
CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
A resolution was read authorizing exchange of information with the State
Department of Revenue. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY
CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ.
In response to inquiry from Councilman Stredicke, City Attorney Warren,
advised Council that there is a specific statute requiring that there be an
agreement, or the Department of Revenue cannot release information.
CARRIED.
September 14. 1987
Board of Adlustment;
Appointment of David M.
Young to Position No.2
CORRESPONDENCE
Senior Citizen's Advisory
Committee
OLD BUSINESS
Utilities Committee
Reoort: Pioneer Federal
Savings Bank; NE 2nd
Place Latecomer
Agreement Sewermain
Improvements, S-435
District Ten Little League
Champions
Mt. Olivet Cemetery
Fountain
Renton City Council Minutes Page 284
A (FOLLOWS), AND ITEM-H (PREVIOUSLY HEARD). CARRIED.
Item-A; Mayor Shinpoch reappoints David M. Young to the Board of
Adjustment. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REAPPOINTMENT OF DAVID M. YOUNG
TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. CARRIED.
Letter from James Denzer, Chairman of Senior Citizens' Advisory Committee,
requested solution to inadequate parking facilities at the Senior Center.
MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER,
CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR. DENZER OF THE SENIOR CITIZEN'S
ADVISORY COMMITTEE BE REFERRED TO THE PARK BOARD FOR
RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THAT
CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR. DENZER OF THE SENIOR CITIZEN'S
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ALSO BE REFERRED TO THE
TRANSPORT A TION COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Letter from Allen and Kathleen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue Northeast,
Renton, Washington, requested prompt written response to the following
questions:
On May 19, 1986, Section 4-3011 (B)(4) of Chapter 30 of the Renton City
Ordinance pertaining to the Hearing Examiner was amended to delete the last
sentence in Subsection (4), which stated as follows:
"To that end, the Examiner shall have all of the powers of the office
from whom the appeal is taken insofar as the decision on the particular
issue is concerned."
Questions posed are who initiated the above-referenced amendment and for
what reason. Was the amendment voted on by Renton City Council, if so,
how did each Council Member vote, if not, who authorized or approved the
amendment. Who now has the enforcement power, who resolves disputes
between the land use policy formulator and the land use policy administrator.
Who now enforces the Hearing Examiner's decisions.
Under Section 4-3002 of Chapter 30 entitled "General Objectives," paragraph
(D) states:
"(D) Separate the land use policy formulation and the land use policy
administration process.
Further question raised, as to how the General Objective (D) achieved since·
the May 19, 1986 amendment of the ordinance and the deletion of the
Hearing Examiner's enforcement power. MOVED BY KEOLKER,
SECONDED BY REED, CORRESPONDENCE FROM ALLEN AND
KATHLEEN JETT BE REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATION FOR
RESPONSE AND COMMENT. CARRIED.
Utilities Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report concurring with the
recommendation of the Public Works Department for approval of the
latecomer agreement with Pioneer Federal Savings Bank for installation of
310 L.F. of 8" PVC sanitary sewer pipe and two manholes, together with
appertenances in N.E. 2nd Place, and recommended that the City Council
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk execute said agreement. MOVED BY
CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Councilwoman Keolker advised Council and Mayor of the importance the
Proclamation presented to District Ten Little League Champions had on team
members.
In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry with regard to Mt. Olivet
Cemetery's ability to maintain a large spray of fountain water with the water
rationing currently taking place in the Northwest, Mayor Shinpoch responded
that Mt. Olivet is private property, but will request City Staff investigation.
August 24. 1987
CONSENT AGENDA
Claim: James, CL-32-87
Claim: Olson, CL-33-87
Claim: Pollard, CL-34-87
Claim: Engle, CL-35-87
Claim: Springbrook Trout
Farm, CL-36-87
Claim: Talley, CL-37-87
Finance: 1986 Auditor's
Report
Finance: 1987 Mid-Year
Budget Adjustment
Finance: Personal Lines
Insurance Broker Bids
Annexation: Container
Corporation
CAG: 86-065, Water
Fluoridation Project, #W-
851
CAG: 86-041, Main
Library Addition and
Renovation Project
Latecomer Agreement:
Fairfield
Development/Hathaway,
#S-429
Renton City Council Minutes Page 269
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Claim for Damages filed by Lenore James, 96 Wells Avenue N., in the
amount of $146.36 for broken driver's window allegedly caused by gravel left
on roadway during construction by the city on North 1st Street. Refer to
.. City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim for Damages filed by Herman Olson, 8246 S. 122nd, Seattle, in the
amount of $153.33 for broken water pressure valve allegedly caused by
increase in water pressure by City Water Department without notification.
Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim for Damages filed by Pauline Pollard, 8246 S. 122nd, Seattle, in the
amount of $687.12 for burst water pipes in basement allegedly caused by
increased water pressure by city without notification. Refer to City Attorney
and insurance service.
Claim for Damages filed by Barbara Engle, 15035 134th Avenue SE, Renton,
for damage to automobile allegedly caused by golf ball from Maplewood Golf
Course. Refer to Cjty Attorney and insurance carrier.
Claim for Damages filed by Springbrook Trout Farm, 19225 Talbot Road, in
amount of $1031.25 for loss of large trout in pond allegedly caused by water
shut off by city without notification. Refer to City Attorney and insurance
service.
Claim for Damages filed by Susan Talley, 13042 144th Avenue SE, Renton,
in the amount of $215.01 for damage to her vehicle allegedly caused by rock
thrown by city mower at airport. Refer to City Attorney and insurance
service.
Finance Department presented State Auditor's Examination of City for 1986.
On file in City Clerk's Office. Information.
Finance·Department presented 1987 mid-year budget adjustment. Refer to
Ways and Means Committee.
Finance Department requested approval of bid call for personal lines
insurance broker to coordinate self-insurance program. Refer to Ways and
Means Committee.
Policy Development Department requested acceptance of Container
Corporation of America annexation, located on the west side of Monster
Road SW in the 600-1000 block, as approved by King County Boundary
Review Board and refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Public
hearing is requested to be scheduled on September 21, 1987 as second
required hearing for imposition of M-P zoning on this site. Council concur.
Public Works/Utility Division requested approval of final pay estimate for
the Water Fluoridation Project W-851, CAG 065-86; and requested approval
of the project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day
lien period, and release of retained amount of $20,552.15 to contractor,
IMCO General Construction, contractor, if all required releases have been
received. Council concur.
Public Works Department requested approval of CAG-041-86, Main Library
Addition and Renovation Project; and requested approval of the project,
authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $19,585.31,
commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$44,763.15 to contractor, William N. Parks Construction Company, if all
required releases have been received. Council concur.
Public Works/Utility Division requested reimbursement in the amount of
$13,239.01 to Fairfield Developments, Inc:, for oversizing of sewer main pipe
from 8" to 12-16" as required by the City to provide service for entire
drainage basin in area of NE 2nd Place to NE 4th Street (East of Union Ave.
NEl. Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
August 24. 1987
Ordinance #4080
Public Safety Facilities
Expansion Master Plan
Bond Issue
AUDIENCE COMMENT
continued
PUD: Final, Polygon,
Sun pointe Condominiums,
FPUD-037-87
Ways and Means
Committee
PUD: Final, Polygon,
Sun pointe Condominiums,
FPUD-037-87
Ordinance #4081
PUD: Final, Polygon,
Sun pointe Condominiums,
FPUD-037-87
Renton City Council Minutes Page 268
expressed in the northeast section of the city for location of a fire station
further east to provide faster response to expanding areas of the city. She
asked if Council could adopt a policy to continue operating an aid car from
the current vicinity of Station 12 if that station were relocated further east.
Fire Chief Lee Wheeler described plans to sell that land if Station 12 is
relocated. Referring to a city map reflecting location of existing and
proposed fire stations and response boundaries, he explained areas which
currently overlap and areas which have inadequate level of service. By
adding stations in the valley area and Kennydale and relocating Station 12,
which currently serves areas overlapped by service from the downtown
station, service to the entire city is improved. Upon further inquiry, Chief
Wheeler advised that if the bond issue passes, four and possibly five aid cars
will serve the city, the fifth dependent upon joint manning agreement with
Fire District #40.
Further discussion was held regarding proposed traffic pattern changes upon
implementation of the plan. *MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR
FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 10:48 p.m. Counil reconvened at 10:58
p.m.; roll was called; all members were present.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented the following
ordinance for second and final reading:
An ordinance was read providing for public safety facilities, including
acquiring, constructing and equipping a police/fire training facility, a
police/court/jail facility and two new fire stations, and providing City Hall
structural improvements and renovations related to the police/court/jail
relocation; declaring the estimated cost thereof as nearly as may be; providing
for the borrowing of a total of $22,200.00 and selling general obligation
bonds to pay the cost thereof, such bonds to be payable by annual property
tax levies to be made in excess of regular property tax levies; and providing
for the submission of the proposition of incurring such indebtedness, issuing
such bonds and levying such indebtedness, issuing such bonds and levying
such excess taxes to the qualified voters of the City at a special election to be
held therein on November 3, 1987, in conjunction with the State general
election to be held on the same date. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED
BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: 6 A YES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, STREDICKE, KEOLKER,
CLYMER. I NAY: HUGHES. CARRIED.
Gary Young, 4020 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201, Kirkland,
Polygon Corporation, requested advancement to Ways and Means Committee
report regarding the Polygon PUD. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED
BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF
BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
REPORT.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report
recommending the following ordinance for first reading and advancement to
second and final reading.
An ordinance was read approving the Final Planned Unit Development, Phase
II, for Polygon Corporation, Sunpointe Condominiums, to allow 256
multifamily units on approximately 13.29 acres of property located at Stevens
Avenue SW and SW 5th Street, File No. FPUD-037-87. MOVED BY
KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES
AND ADVANCE THIS ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL
READING. CARRIED.
Following second and final reading of the aforementioned ordinance, it was
MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke
regarding deadline for completion of the entire project, Chairman Keolker
referenced Conclusion No.7 and Recommendation No.4 of the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation which require submission of Phase III plans
within 12 months of the prior approval or by March, 1988. ROLL CALL:
6 A YES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, KEOLKER, HUGHES, CLYMER.
I NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Chairman Keolker requested that City
Attorney Warren provide a definitive answer on whether this project falls
within the authority of the PUD Ordinance before or after it was revised.
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has
fixed the ~!§~_Q~Y_2f_§§E~§mQ§r_!2§Z, at 8:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill
Avenue South, as the time and place to consider the
imposition of M-P (Manufacturing Park) Zoning on property
included in The Container Corporation Annexation. The
property is located on the west .side of Monster Road SW in
the 600 -1000 block.
Any and all persons are invited to be present and express
their approval, disapproval or opinion on this matter.
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor, CMC
City Clerk
Date of Publication: August 28, 1987
,.
'. -
1-.---
\ ~..
,5-;Z0-~7
,
NOTICE
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
ON __ S---,eD_tE1.:-lbe_r 2_1,-1 ---,19_87 __ AT 8:00 P.M.
RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
For the puroose of considering 14-P (J'bnufacturing Park) Zoning on a 45.08
acre Darcel in the process of annexation to the City of Renton, known as
The Container Corporation of Arerica. PrOPerty is located on the west side
of .I'onster Road SW In the 600-HID block.
f1rrY and all Persons are
invited to be present to
voice approval, disapproval
or opinions on this
IIIJtter.
,'. ,.
Complete legal description &-further iiformation aUatt:aDte
W • I The removal, mutilation, destruction . a r· n·1 n 9 or concealme.nt of this notice Is a mis-
•. ~ demeanor .. punishable by fine .and
. . Imprisonment.. .. ..
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
August 24, 1987
The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch; Mayor
Members of the Renton City Council
. Renton, Washington 98055
CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Subject: Container Corporation of America Annexation and Rezone
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The Policy Development Department requests that the City Council hold the second of
the two required public hearings on imposition of MP -Manufacturing Park zoning on
3.08 acres of property included in the Container Corporation of America Annexation
(please refer to the attached map). The Department requests that this hearing be
scheduled for September 21, 1987.
The proponent of the 45.08 acre Container Corporation of America Annexation filed a
concurrent request to rezone their 42 acres of property to MP -Manufacturing Park in
1986. On January 20, 1987, the City's Hearing Examiner held the first of the two
. required public hearings on the imposition of MP zoning on the property owned by
Container Corp. On February 9, 1987, the Council held the second of the two required
public hearings on the imposition of MP zoning on the 42 acres and the first of the two
required public hearings on the remaining 3.08 acres. Council concurred in the
recommendation of MP zoning at both of these hearings.
The Policy Development .Department also requests that Council authorize the preparation
of an ordinance reflecting the acceptance of this annexation and, if approved by
Council, the imposition of MP zoning on the entire 45.08 acres of property as
recommended by staff.
ctdsk3
ccal
Attachment
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206).235-2552
~~ :~.
l~: ..
., '. ,
~ "". "
".';.~
--;". ~~. ~ .... " .
"
~~ ." .
.... -.
•
-L--<::r=::::{~ ~PNe.~ ~p.p
, . " .. '. OF AM~\(t"
~~~' P-.e~J!..
\ ,
\
I ,
Y~NI-ry fY\AP
"-...... -.-~-t-
MET
IS P 0 5
w u «
III
'I
I
I
I
.c:.;--c;;, -1--_
I
1 I
I I.
Oft
\
CHI(.A(.Q MILWAUKEE 8. R.R.
_. -.--. -. --• --. _. --.. t!ti..!8_ . ...:.1:.'--~=:'::':::':'=:':J
----,,, ... -,-' ---' --
SOUTH
AREA
" , --
• ;
\
\
\ ".
Ct)NTAlNGR
or AMEIIIC"
CORP..
OF AMERICA
'. " \
UJItP.
\ i"f.ft"'NG
\
\ ,
\ C:-'--.. --.--.~.-
.,."'-.. \ \~:",
U." "-,OP
... ~ " r--'-~----_ ... _--
"': .. ::.:::" -= =:::. :::::-:.
TOWER o
"'-.L.-·-":··-
"-
"-,,' '-
EARLINGTON
" " " " ,I
" "-, -. , , , , , ,
MUNb
TO:
FROM:
IN RE:
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County .
906 Smith Thwer Seattle, Washington 98104 71;/ep/wne (206) 344-4196
July 30, 1987
CARRIE TRIMNELL, ASSISTANT PLANNER
CITY OF RENTON
G. BRICE MARTIN,
Executive Secretary
CLOSING LETTER
FILE NO'1438 CITY OF RENTON
Proposed Annexation
7\e~/d.
JUL 31 '87
(Container Corporation of America)
You have been advised that the above file was formally filed effective as of
May 27, 1987
The Board has received no request for review and has not Itself chosen to invoke
jurisdiction. Therefore. the 60-day filing period having now elapsed, this notice
Is hereby deemed approved as of July 26. 1987 •
The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are
changes by the Council. the Board may be required to review the action at that
time.
When the proposal Is ready for finalization. It will be necessary that you file
one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with
the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle,
Washington 98104. together with a copy of this letter.
GBM/pr
CC: Office of the Clerk of the CounCil. ATTN: Helene Moclulskl
K.C. Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight
K.C. Dept. of Assessments. ATTN: Diane Murdock
Parks. Planning 6; Resources Department. ATTN: Mr~ Jim Tracy,
Deputy Director
K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections
Ref. 4.15.87
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
906 Smith 7bwer Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344-4196
June 3, 1987
~
TO: carrie Trimne11, Assistant Planner
city of Renton
FROM: PAULA ANNE RUSSELL. Adm. Asst.
IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
FILE NO. 1438p CITY OF RENTON
Proposed Annexation
... " I vt" HENTON
JUN 4 1987
POUCY D~I_OPMf~!T n~",.
(Container Corporation of America)
The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office Is now acceptable for filing
and has been filed effective May 27. 1987 and assigned
File No. 1438 • You will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action.
As you are aware. a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County Council
by this office. This was under date of February 26, 1987
Any revisions to the legal description subsequent to that date must be Incorporated
In your final ordinance/resolution filed with the King County Council.
PAR
. CC: Clerk of the Council. ATTN: Helene Mociulski
Dept. of Public Works. ATTN: Rex Knight
Dept. of Assessments. ATTN: Diane Murdock
Dept. of' Parks ·Planni~g· & Recreation-
ATTN: . Jim Tracy
Re!.93J
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
May 21, 1987
Ms. Paula Anne Russell, Administrative Assistant
King County Boundary Review Board
906 Smith Tower .
Seattle, Washington 98104
Subject: Container Corp of America Annexation
Dear Paula:
CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attached please find a copy of the revised legal description for the above referenced
annexation.
If I can provide the Board with any additional information, please do not hesitate to give
me a call.
Sincerely,
Carrie Trimnell
Assistant Planner
CT:2611G
Attachment
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2552
SPEED LETTER ~", I..Il"liENTON
MAY 1 U 1987
~~~£(.
TO:' ~Si DATE: '. }7?.'?!::?7 _---'-~~~..:::L..:..~ ___ __,.-PROJECT: ~
SUBJECT:_.kLo~d'::::L--I.· ~~~-'-' _. __ _ ~
'~---.-... --.---.
'I I
. I
I
I
'/ l~ i 0_ --~I f--------,---------'-
(Si~~
E X H I BIT "A"
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Description
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-25-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the northerly Right-of~Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the existing City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line and
northeasterly line of Northern Pacific Railway Main Line through the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast Quarter of said Section 23
and through the Southeast Quarter of ,Section 14 to the thread of the Black
River (the former limits of the City of Tukwila) and the existing limits of the
City of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4040;
Thence northeasterly along said thread 'and said City limits line to the
centerline Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. 143rd
St.), also being the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under Ordinance
No. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said existing City of Renton limits
to the south line of said Section 13;
'Thence southerly along said City limits, said line also being the west
Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 24 to the point of beginning.
Fl.ll-B 05/15/87
z
(') ~ q,
~ 10·
0-9. ~S'
"I7'£:0 SEP'\I:.~'O
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING. 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
MEMORANDUM
OF N/ ..
'1--f .. ::'" .,),
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR
TO:
FROM:
IN RE:
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344-4196
March 11, 1987
CARRIE TRIMNELL, ASSISTANT PLANNER
CITY OF RENTON
PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst.
REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL
FILE NO. 1438p CITY OF RENTON
Proposed Annexation
\,11 I ur Ht:NTON
MAR 1 a 1987
POLICY n""~toPMENT n~_
(Container Corporation of America)
. Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from the County Engineering Staff
regarding the legal description and related Assessor's maps submitted as part
of the above Notice of Intention.
If you are in agreement with these comments, please submit a revised legal
description at your earliest opportunity. We suggest you direct any questions
regarding this matter to Jim Bergsma (Department of Public Works) on
Extension 4134.
PAR
Encls; as noted
ce: Office of Council Clerk, 402 Courthouse
Jim Bergsma, Dept. of Public Works, 900 Administration
King County
Department of Public \Vorks
Donald]. LaBelle, Director
900 King County Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, washington 98104
(206) 344~2517
March 6, 1987
Mr. G. Brice Martin
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
W-378 Courthouse
RE: Proposed Annexation to CITY OF RENTON (Container Corporation of America)
Temporary File No. 1438P
Dear Mr. Martin:
We have checked the legal description of the attached proposed annexation and
find it requiring revision.
The enclosed copy of the legal description is marked with our comments on this
matter.
The related Assessor's map appears to be for the same area as described in the
1 ega 1 descri pt ion.
This annexation does not appear to include a portion of a County park nor
conflict with any other city in the vicinity.
Very truly yours,
€t1 :E.
Manager
Engineering Services
RHK/JRB:kw
Enclosure: Entire File
cc: Helene Mociulski
402-A Courthouse
---. ... All tho: '. ,on of the Southwest Quarter o{ lon 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of Section 111 ;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23,
A~d' of the Horthwest Quarter of Section 2~;
All in Township n North, Range • East, W. H. I in King County, WashIngton
described as fol10llt's:
Beginning at the intersection of the ~esterly Right-of-Way line of
Honster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 2~-23-6-1.
:2.5"
Established ~-~-'l. or County Rd. NO.8)
or the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line
with the northerly Right-of-Way Line
-( c"'O M4uJ (,,1,.)£)
Rlght~of-way~in the Northwest Cuarter
or said Section 24 said point also being the exlsting City Limit of Renton as
annexed by OrdInances No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-or-Way Line IWb ",e~T 41NC. of
NP. Ry MI\l~ 1..>JE. through the Northwest Quarter or said Section 24 and through the Northeast
Quarter of said Section 23 and through the Southeast Quarter" of Section 14 to
f'b R.I<'I at
the thread of .the Black River and(the '" f l' 9 limits of the City of TUkWila) 't1..t..-~"I $T'~" C-ITt .c.IMIT.:s: ~~ RbJrOAJ AS Ji.!..TA8{..J~EJ) By cRoP. 4/6V~ J'
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to'the
14S
So. ~rd
c.1Wre:'" . ';~t~erl) R!g~t of wey line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known 8S
St.), being also the·existing City Limit of Renton 85 annexed under Ordinance"
"'&::::::1:1::6.*==" eI . NO. 192 a ;
TI< ..., c. • 1""1 L.:' IV" r 5 '" ~ R it..,,.,, <.l
Thence easterly and southeasterly along s ii routbe r
]) qi::g:ht 'GfztH8Mf bl"e
of ·"OlisLt: RoW S '. to the south line of said Section IJ;
s ... &t e:1-t I ''''''.~ -.J.
Thence southerly along,l\the. west Right-or .. Way Line of said Monster Road
S.w. in the Northwest Cuarter of said Section 2. to the point of beginning.
FLll-B 02109/87
6oNiA1N~··~.--~--W\~\aA-
.AN N i:. '1ATl oN
--------
0tTy OF
L.r~,AL
I2,ENToN' ~IBlT
re.~IPTION
FILE NO 1438p CITY OF RENTON
Proposed Annexation
(Container Corp of America)
.\.
Boundary Review Board
King COUllty, State of Washington
King County Courthouse Seallle, Washington'9811J4 Telephone (206) 344-4196
March 5, 1987
MEHORAIIDUM
TO: CARRIE TRIMNELL, ASSISTANT PLANNER
CITY OF RENTON
FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary
IN RE: BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FILE NO. 1438p CITY OF RENTON
Proposed Annexation
(Container Corporation of America)
Enclosed is the staff SUIlIr.ary of the referenced Notice of Intention. It is i.ncluded
in the agenda materials sent to the Board for the meeting of· March 12, 1987
GBM/pr
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Temp. File No. l438p Permanent File No. __ _ Received:
Entity: CITY OF RENTON
Action: Annexation
Tentatve F.D.
Date Filed:
Expires:
Jur. Taken:
Title: Container Corporation of America Hearing:
RESPONSE LETTERS
Department of Public Works Util. Coord./Planning Division
Counsel to Board Entity Notified of Filing On
ADDITIONAL ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED
Council Member(s): Greive
Clerk of the Council; K.C. Dept. of Assessments; K.C. Fire
Marshall, DOE; DSHS; PSCOG; King Subregional Council
Cities and Towns: Tukwila
K.C. Fire Districts: 40, 20 Sewer Districts:
School District: Renton #403 Water Districts:
SEPA DECLARATION:
COMMENTS OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:
Location Between Earlington Golf Course and Ft. Dent Park/ Green River,
Approximately one-fourth mile north of 1-405
Land Area
Population
Assessed Valuation
Community Plan Area
Community Plan Designation
County Zoning
City Comprehensive Plan
City Zoning
District Compo Plan
District Franchise
Sewerage General Plan
ON FIRST REVIEW:
45 acres
-0-
$4,508,400
M-H (Heavy Hanufacturing)
H-P (Hanufactur!ng -Park)
LSA
.3-12-87 ON SECOND REVIEW:
2/26/86
2/26/86
4-9-87
SUMHARY. FILE NO. 1438. Cont.
This 45 acre annexation is an unincorporated island located between Renton and
Tukwila. Renton is the clearly establishec! purveyor of services within this vicinity
east of the railroad tracks (see Thomas Bros. Plate 41. The annexation area is '.!letter .
displaved In the north-central portion of the plate. than it is on the vicinity maps.)
This is an established manufacturing area. anc! the City's proposed zoning is very
similar to King County's. The proposal appears to be rational in all respects but
one. That is. the railroad right-of-way along the southwest boundary of the
annexation is not included. That. right-of-way WOUld. remain in King Countv as
an island Il4 feet wide and 2100 f~~t long. It may be that Renton expects Tuk'wlla
to annex the right-of-way. As of this writing we do not know why Renton prepared
the boundary as they did. ·However. the assessor's map prepared by City staff displavs
the remaining island so clearly that one can only conclude that"they were aware
of it. It is recommended a request for review not be executed. at least pending
receipt of an explanation from Renton. **
GBH/pr
3-4-87
**We received an oral report that Renton and TukwiI a! have agreed that the Island
lies within the latter's service area. Renton is sending documentation.
!
CITY OF RENTON
00II. -POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
March 3, 1987
Mr. G. Brice Martin, Executive Secretary
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
906 Smith Tower
Seattle, Washington 98104
Subject: Proposed Container Corporation of America Annexation
Dear Brice:
As per our telephone conversation, please find attached a copy of the letter from
Tukwila's Mayor Gary VanDusen regarding the island created by the proposed Container
Corporation of America Annexation to the City of Renton. I hope this letter is of
assistance to you. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Carrie Trimnell
Assistant Planner
CT:2492G
Attachment
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -(206) 235-2552
I
1
I
cstv of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433·1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
Mr. Larry Springer, Director
Renton Policy Development Department
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
November 24, 1986
1.11 I Ul-Hl:NTON
u,~C 1 1986
RE: Proposed Container Corporation Annexation.
Dear Mr. Springer,
The Tuhlila City Administration has no objection to the City of Renton
annexing the island of unincorporated King County located immediately east
of Fort Dent Park ~lith the following exception: the western boundary of
the City of Renton's annexation should be the eastern edge of the Burling-
ton Northern Railroad right-of-way (see attached map).
Terminating the Renton annexation along the eastern railroad right-of-way
would allow the City of Tukwila to later annex this area and continue the
smooth boundary our cities have just formed along this line to the imme-
diate north and south.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Vernon
Umetsu of my staff at 433-1858.
VU/sjn
attachment
cc: Robert Mui 11 i ,
Glacier Park Company
(Burlington Northern RR)
Joe Nagel,
King County Planning and
Cornmun ity Development Dept.
Brice Martin,
King County Boundary
Review Board
Sincerely,
~.~~.
~n . -------
Mayor
j
I
I
I
I
!
I
,
-j
!
i
" ~
1
i
-,
I
--
/
/
./
/
I
/
./
/
/
/"" ,
/
/
'-
/
/ -.
\
'0
, ' .~
/
.. \
'?
;1"
2138N
CITY OF RENTON
OETERMINA TION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-103-86
APPLICA TION NO{s).: NI A
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to anne)( 45.08 acres (CCA. Metro.
and King County parcels) to the City of Renton.
PROPONENT: Container Corporation of America
LOCA TION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 7000 South 143rd Street.
Renton. WA 98055.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43.2IC.030(2){c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055
Phone: 235-2550
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing E)(aminer no
later than February 2. 1987.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton.
Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
DATE OF DECISION: January 14. 1987
PUBLICATION DATE: January 19.1987
Ronald G. Nelson
Building and Zoning Director
/) ~ ~---.\/ '" } . .-' " 7-:_<---<--K,0".~ ~
Richard C. Houghton ! J
Public Works Director -
24llG
ANNEXATION REVIEW SUMMARY
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
75% ANNEXATION
PUBLIC MEETING -FEBRUARY 9, 1987
A. SUMMARY AND LOCATION
The applicant proposes the annexation of property totalling ± 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road S.W. in the 600-1000 block.
The signature on the petition constitutes 99.8% of the assessed valuation
within the proposed annexing area. This annexation and concurrent rezone
request, file R-021-86, to M-P (Manufacturing Park) is requested in order
that sanitary sewer service may be secured for the property.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION
The city limits in the vicinity of the proposed annexation were created
by the following ordinances:
Ordinance #1745 -4/14/59
Ordinance #1764 -5/27/59
Ordinance #1928 -12/22/61
A deannexation ordinance (111928 of 12/26/61) of property adjacent along
the northwesterly border of the site is also involved. King County
zoning of the subject property is MH (Heavy Manufacturing). In the
County's Environmentally Sensitive Area overlay, the western half of the
subject site is designated as a Class III Seismic Hazard area. In
addition, there is identified a shallow water "Wetland" section in the
extreme northwesterly corner (running southwest-northeast).
The City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as
Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. The existing and projected use of
the site is consistent with this classification. Under Renton's proposed
Environmentally Sensitive Area regulation, two areas of sensitivity have
been identified. The area in the extreme northwesterly corner is
classified as "Very Severe" due to the existence of the wetland. In the
south-center and southeast portion along Monster Road S. W. is a "Very
Severe" designation due to slopes of 40% or greater.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
The City of Renton presently services the site with water and storm
sewer. Sanitary sewer service will be provided along with the Local
Improvement District for the property.
-2-
Fire service is presently provided by King County Fire District #40
located at 14810 Petrovitsky Road. Upon annexation, the City of Renton
Fire station 1111, located at 211 Mill Avenue South, would serve the
property. Police patrol services on Monster Road S. W. pass adjacent to
the proposed annexation area.
D. ANALYSIS:
1. Departments evaluating the subject annexation have not found any
major problems related to their areas of responsibility as a result
of this proposal.
2. Reviewing departments have indicated
represents a logical extension of
departments.
that the proposed annexation
services provided by their
3. All departments indicated that service to this area could be
accommodated within existing facilities, staff, and budget resources.
4. All municipal departments support the proposed annexation.
5. At this public meeting, the City is required by RCW 35A.14.120 to
answer the following questions:
a. Will the City accept the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an
indication of intent to annex? The Policy Development
Department recommends that the Council accept the annexation
petition.
b. Will the City require simultaneous adoption of zoning-
regulations for the property? The Policy Development
Department advises that the City require simultaneous rezoning
of the property and recommends that M-P -zoning be imposed on
the site (see later discussion).
c. Will the City require the property to assume its proportional
share of the City I S bonded indebtedness? The Policy
Development Department recommends that this requirement be
imposed.
6. City Council Resolution No. 2429 establishes policies for the
evaluation of annexation applications. The proposed annexation is
generally consistent with those poliCies favoring extension of
existing public services, falls within the City I s identified sphere
of influence, and is within its general service areas.
Zoning
When this annexation application was originally filed, the proponent
(Container Corporation of America) also filed a concurrent rezone
application. However, the rezone appliation covered only that property
-3-
owned by Container Corporation + 42 acres), as they cannot request zoning
on property not in their ownership. The remaining + 3.08 acres are owned
by King County and the Union Pacific Railroad Company. The Hearing
Examiner considered Container Corporation's request for Manufacturing
Park (M-P) zoning on January 20, 1987. This request is in conformance
with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Manufacturing
Park/Multiple Option and is consistent with the existing and developing
land uses in the vicinity. It would seem reasonable, therefore, to
impose Manufacturing Park zoning on the remaining acreage also.
E. RECOMMENOATION
Based upon the foregoing analysis, the Policy Oevelopment Oepartment
supports the various City departments' recommendations for approval of
the requested annexation and rezone. If Council concurs in these and
those of 0-5 above, the Policy Development Department recommends that
Council approve the petition application and impose Manufacturing Park
zoning on the additional ± 3.08 acres and that the Policy Development
Department be instructed to submit a Notice of Intent package to the King
County Boundary Review Board pursuant to existing policy.
· -
-.' .
,;' ..
CHI(.A(,O MILWAUKEE &
'-. -.-._._.
SOUT
J
~
'-\ ,
Gov't lot I
13.70 Acres
CONt41 MER CORP,
0' AMERICA
I
J
!
............... _ ....
\
\ ,
\
C'"'-.. _._'¥# "', \ . \,,' -._ .
.. \-~~",::-: --~.~. "'::; .... . ,------.... '). I ....
....
..... , "---.... PA'lf .... , ..... ..... ..... .....
EARliNGTON 60U
,I
I' ,I
" .-\ ....... , -\ ..... ~
I , , ,
MUNti,fAlI
-~ .. " ....... :
· \ --_. -----!---...:.-~--
I -;
DIS P 0 S AI L \0-
I \
I
01
oJ}
w
01
~
...
,
I ,
I
"
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila washington 98188
(2061 433-1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
Mr. Larry Springer, Director
Renton Policy Development Department
Muni ci pa 1 Buil di ng
200 Mill Avenue South
Ren~on, Washington 98055
November 24, 1986
1..11 I VI-HI:NTON
ul~C 1. 1986
RE: Proposed Container Corporation Annexation.
Dear Mr. Springer,
The Tukwila City Administration has no objection to the City of Renton
annexing the island of unincorporated King County located immediately east
of Fort Dent Park with the following exception: the western boundary of
the City of Renton's annexation should be the eastern edge of the Burling-
ton Northern Railroad right-of-way (see attached map).
Terminating the Renton annexation along the eastern railroad right-of-way
would allow the City of Tukwila to later annex this area and continue the
smooth boundary our cities have just formed along this line to the imme-
diate north and south.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Vernon
Umetsu of my staff at 433-1858.
VU/sjn
attachment
cc: Robert Muilli,
Glacier Park Company
(Burlington Northern RR)
Joe 'Nage 1,
King County Planning and
Community Development Dept.
Brice Martin,
King County Boundary
Review Board
Sincerely,
~,
Mayor
I
11 ~ /~ ,
.'
/
" "
/
"
Tt.A 1::'. W \ L A
Su ('foa. lED
A.N f\l D<. A ']1 o~
LI"1 I r
,
I
.I
/
i
NG/-'(" I''''~ DEP1' ;JUku: L-j'" t.~ .... -: - .
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
~'(J l~'
//If!
January' 29, 1987
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
BUILDING & ZONING
DEPARTMENT REPORT:
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
File No.: R -021-86
West side of Monster Road SW. at the 600-11 00 Block.
Approval to rezone approximately 42 acres of property to
M-P. Property currently being reviewed for annexation to
the City of Renton.
Building and Zoning Department Recommendation:
Approval
Hearing Examiner Decision: Recommend approval by the
City Council upon annexation into the City.
The Building & Zoning Department Report was received
by the Examiner on January 13, 1987
After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department
Report, examining available information on file with the
application, and field checking the property and
surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing
on the subject as fOllows:
The hearing was opened on January 20, 1987 at 900 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner,
The following exhibits were entered intO.the record:
Exhibit #1 -Yellow File containing application, proof of posting
and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit #2 -Assessors Map
Exhibit #3 -Map showing Metro holdings within Container
Corporation site,
The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior
Planner. In her review she pointed out that the site is bordered by Monster Road which is a major
access, and zoned M-H with King County which is heavy industrial zoning; the Comprehensive Plan
shows the property as M-P mUltiple option; and the northern half of the site is occupied by a
manufacturing plant and office with a wetland in the northeast corner of the property.
Continuing, Mrs. Samek-McKague stated uses surrounding the site show undeveloped property to the
north which is Black River Forest Park, as well as the Metro Treatment Plant and P-I Channel, light
industrial/commercial uses and the City of Tukwila. She stated utilities are available in the area; the
rezone of 42 acres is to be processed simultaneous with an annexation (which incorporates a larger
parcel of property); reviewed city departmental comments noting the Utilities and Fire Departments
each feel the water system will have to be upgraded, with Traffic Engineering commenting that the
roadway adjacent to the property is unsuitable for any major development. The applicant has already
agreed to participate in LID 332 which will bring sewers to the site, and has agreed to participate in
,the Oakesdale Street improvements. Mrs. Samek-McKague reviewed the criteria to be considered when
considering a rezone and stated this property was not included in the recent city-wide rezone; the
request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; utility improvements are avail able to the site
via LID 332; and it is felt this is a timely application as the property is surrounded by Renton City
limits and is a logical extension to the west. Based on information provided to staff, Senior Planner
Samek-McKague asked the Examiner to recommend approval of this request to the City Council.
Calling for testimony in support of this proposal from the applicant or their representative, responding
was Hilario Ramirez. Container Corporation of America. 7000 So. l43rd Avenue. Renton. WaShington
98055. Mr. Ramirez advised the Examiner that .3 acres of their site at the southern tip is owned by
Metro. Metro purchased the land to install their surge line, and said land is still in King County, He
'''''",,' E,h;b;, #3 ,howi". M,,,,', bol"o,' w;lliio ili, CO"mio", Co"o"O," '0""
Container Corporation of America
R-021-86
hnuary 29. 1987 .
Page 2
the utility charges assessed to the applicant. He was advised he would have to work out this matter
with Ron Olson of the Utility Engineering Department. He had no further comments or questions.
The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to
speak. and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:20 A.M.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
I. The applicant, Container Corporation of America, filed a request for approval of a rezone for
approximately 42 acres of property from King County zoning to M-P (Manufacturing Park)
zoning upon annexation of the site by the City of Renton.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a
Declaration· of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter .. '-----_.J
5. The subject site is located on the west side of the 600 to 1100 block of Monster Road. The site
is almost due west of the Metro Sewage Treatment Plant.
6. The subject site is located just outside the City'S western boundary in unincorporated King
County. The site is being reviewed for annexation into the City by the City Council. That
review is independent of this action, although the City Council will review both items together
once a recommendation is made on the rezone request.
7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is
located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but does
not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan.
8. At the Public Hearing it was disclosed that a portion of the legally identified subject site is not
owned by the applicant, but that the portion is owned by Metro. Since Metro did not join in
the application it would be inappropriate to consider a request for the portion of the property
which is owned by Metro. Since the legal description included the entire site, it appears
appropriate to consider the request as it solely affects the applicant's property.
9. As indicated, the Metro Plant is east of the site, undeveloped property zoned M-P (the category
requested) is located north of the site, with light industrial uses located south of the site and
portions of Tukwila and unincorporated King County located west of the site. The site itself is
currently zoned MH, a King County designation permitting heavy manufacturing.
10. An LID to construct Oakesdale Avenue, a proposed major arterial adjacent to the subject site
has been approved by the City Council. Sanitary sewers will be included in the LID and will
bring sewer service to the subject site.
11. The Fire Department and Utilities division of the Public Works Department raised issues related
to the adequacy of the water lines serving the subject site.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it
will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one
of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that:
a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use
analysis; or
b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is
located since the last rezoning of the property or area.
The requested classification is justified and should be approved by the City Council.
•
.,' ~'" ".' . . .. :. ' .. " .. : .'
"---'
Container Corporation of America
R-021-86
January 29, 1987
Page 3
2. The requested zoning, M-P, is a direct implementation of the manufacturing park designation
found in the Comprehensive Plan. It is also obviously compatible with the existing development
on the site and is analogous to the current classification given the site in King County.
3. Obvious changes or planned changes in the area are the LID for Oakesdale Ave, as well as the
proposed development of the Black River Forest property north and northeast of the subject
site.
4. Only one question remains, if water service is currently inadequate should the site be given a
zoning which permits even more intense development? If the usual G (General) Zoning were
automatically attached, additional development would not be of right. Since the Council will
also be tackling the issue as part of the annexation process, if staff still believe water service to
the site is a critical concern, upgrading could be a condition of annexation to the City.
5. In conclusion, it appears reasonable to rezone the subject site to M-P upon annexation, and the
City Council should reclassify the site as requested.
6. Again, this recommendation should be read as removing from consideration the property which
is owned by Metro. While they may not object to such action they were not properly a party to
the proceeding, and this office has no jurisdiction to make any recommendation regarding the
status of the Metro parcel.
DECISION
The City Council should reclassify the subject site to M-P when the site is annexed into the
City.
ORDERED THIS 29th day of January, 1987.
FRED J. KAUFMAN
HEARING EXAMINER
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of January, 1987 to the parties of record:
Hilario Ramirez
Container Corporation
7000 South 143rd Avenue
Renton, Washington 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of January, 1987 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City'S Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in
writing on Or before 5:00 P.M .. February 12. 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of
the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a
written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the
Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and
the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal
be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified
requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance
Department, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications
may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may
Container Corporation of America
R-021-86
January 29, 1987
Page 4
not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the
land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication
permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to
openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as
well as Appeals to the City Council.
•
--de:: __ _ I·
I i" ! • I
: c;;!, ,0
I
I
I r
. ;
" '.
.'
M E
-". _. ___ I ___ '-
S"·p 0
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
R-021-86
I
I
I
APPL I CANT CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA + TOTAL AREA ____ ~4~2~.O~A~C~R~ES~_
PRINCIPALCCESS_~M~O~N~S~T~E~R~R~O~A~D_S~.W~.~ ___________________________ __
EXIST ING . I I NG NA (ZONED IN KING COUNTY MH HEAVY INDUSTRY)
E X 1ST I NG u ~ E MANUFACTURING PLANT AND ASSOCIATED OFFICE BUILDING --~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-------
PROPOSED USE REZONE TO MANUFACTURING PARK (M-P) AS PART OF ANNEXATION/REZONE PR,ocl~s:
COMPREHENSIVE LAND LISE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK -MULTIPLE OPTION
CDt1MENTS ________________________________________________________ __
~-.-.-
D
LAKE
WASHINGTON
LAND USE ELEMENT
Single Family
lLow Density
rJlultl-i=amily
Medium Density
Multi-Family
High Density
Multi-Family
Recreation
Greenbelt
• Commercial
tm Office / Office Parlt
~ ~
Public / Quasi-Public
light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Manufacturing Park
I Multiple Option
I' .. !J;~~~~ .1. _--~
f'
-.' . ' .. --. -'-
. ,
\
, .
JLROAD
/
P{;!CPH~T'( J.
Lll~E .
n n t~_
\J
5.143 rd ::.T.
,. ,
\
• em ....
FICE _"'''-'-1
PLANT ~
"17,tW ~p. ~
t~600S:F.. ", . ~
J ,~,
A-DoI1IOAJ l .'
, ,
· "
, , ,
.r
" '.
, ,
I. : .
, .
PROPERTY -~
· . • •
LINE
, , , . .' ~.' . . . ' . ;.
0"-" ."aCld'C 0
, .
.,
. '.
-
•..• ' 'I! ,I
\If "I>.
'" -~.
,,_ .,o: •• ~ . ~~,_.
'\ . , . ," .
,
\
\
, Q."
.... ,.' ".1
-",0> !
"
\
\
"
..
f'''Rm. JNTE'RaI'fOR emf
------
. .... ,'.,,-< .•.
',,-.. ";','
i
i
••
«
-1 ,
"''';-~ :: . '. ~.
:!"~,;i;;;P0~f,~~~f;~!*,~l~lji(%,~~.~~:t~~1',~1,#~i'i~!!~,.,';,
,i: ':', ~.
"', :"",
February 9, 1987
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
P.UBLIC HEARINGS <:::::A~nexation: Container
':COrporation 75% Petition
ClIiid Rezone, R-021-87
Annexation: Sierra
Heigh ts 75% Peti tion and
Rezone
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
THOMAS W. TRIMM, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, RICHARD
M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER, ROBERT J. HUGHES, EARL
CLYMER
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Policy
Development Director; LT. GARRY ANDERSON, Police Department
Gail Folkins, Valley Daily News
Correction noted by Keolker: Page 41, paragraph seven, third line, change .. I 2
six-foot" to "six 12-foot." MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY
STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF
FEBRUARY 2,1987, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and
mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the
public hearing to consider the Container Corporation of America 75%
Annexation Petition and Rezone. The proposal, consisting of 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-I 000 block,
includes a concurrent rezone to M-P, Manufacturing Park, zone to allow
installation of sanitary sewer service to the subject site for future
development. The applicant has applied to the Hearing Examiner for the
more intensive M-P zoning classification on the property, and the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation for approval will be scheduled on the Council
agenda of 2/23/87 if no appeals are filed (R-021-87). The hearing this date
constitutes the second of two required public hearings on the annexation and
rezone.
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the
subject site, reviewed staff recommendations, and advised that although the
majority of the subject site is owned by Container Corporation, small
portions at the northern end are owned by Metro, King County and
Burlington Northern Railroad Company. Following approval of the
annexation by the King County Boundary Review Board, a second public
hearing will be scheduled to consider the rezone of the remaining portion to
M-P, Manufacturing Park.
Upon Council inquiry regarding whether "Hobo Junction" is included in the
scope of the annexation, Lt. Garry Anderson, Police Department, indicated
his understanding that the area in question is no longer inhabited by
transients, and no problems have been reported.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE ANNEXATION,
REQUIRE STIPULATIONS OF ZONING, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION, AND THE PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; AND REFER THIS MA TIER TO THE
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO KING
COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and
mailed in accordance with State the local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the
public hearing to consider the Sierra Heights 75% annexation petition and
rezone to R-l, single family residential zone. The proposal contains 33.71
acres and is located on the west side of l32nd Avenue SE (Union Avenue
NE) westerly to l28th Avenue SE from SE 102nd Street southerly to slightly
south of SE 106th Street.
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the
subject site which contains 69 parcels, reviewed staff recommendations, noted
February 9. 1987
Rezone: Renton-Tukwila
Boundary Adjustment
Renton City Council Minutes Page 50
that signatures on the petition constitute 75.67% of the assessed valuation, and
indicated the purpose of the annexation to allow connection of properties
currently experiencing septic tank failure to City sewer service. Mr. Springer
advised that the original scope of the annexation was reduced in order to
gather the required number of signatures in areas supporting the proposal.
He also noted the possibility that areas to the north would desire annexation
in the future.
Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Springer confirmed that only one-half of the
right-of-way of 106th Street is included in the annexation; and in accordance
with Council policy, connection to sewers wiII not be allowed unless
properties first annex to the City.
Audience comment was invited. Carol Halvorson, 12803 SE 102nd Street,
Renton, and Mike Anderson, 10318 129th Avenue SE, supported approval of
the annexation.
At Council request, Mr. Springer designated the location of the property
owned by the StilwiII family (13052 SE 102nd) which was not included in the
annexation since owners of adjacent property were opposed to the proposal.
Mr. and Mrs. Stilwill had requested sewer connection on 7!7 /86, due to septic
failure and were awaiting circulation of an annexation petition. In response
to Council suggestion that properties on the south side of 102nd be included
in the current annexation instead of waiting until septic problems occur, Mr.
Springer cautioned that increasing the scope of the annexation may result in
inability to achieve required 75% participation.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEPT· THE ANNEXATION,
IMPOSE THE STIPULATIONS OF ZONING, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION, AND PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS; AND REFER THIS MA TIER TO POLICY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO KING COUNTY
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED.
Noting that some of the residents in the annexation formerly participated in a
community council, Councilman Stredicke questioned authority of such
councils .. City Attorney Warren indicated that while community councils
have no legal authority, they can effectively galvanize individual property
owners towards a common goal.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published
in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the first of
two required public hearings to consider the imposition of zoning on two
parcels of property transferred from the City of Tukwila as a result of the
Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment annexation, effective on 2/4/87.
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the
two parcels on a vicinity map of the area. He advised that Light industrial,
L-I, classification is recommended for the northerly parcel composed
principally of the Black River Quarry (Area A), which presently contains a
rock crusher operation and associated equipment storage and repair. That site
is presently zoned M-I or Light Industrial in the City of Tukwila.
Manufacturing Park, M-P, classification is recommended for the second
parcel located south of Longacres Race Track (Area B), in conformance with
the area-wide Green River Valley Rezone and the Comprehensive Plan.
At Council request, Mr. Springer agreed to investigate the life expectancy of
the rock quarry use to determine whether L-I zoning is appropriate in the
future. He noted that alternative zoning such as Office Park or
Manufacturing Park would be much more restrictive on the site. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE
PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Discussion was held regarding the
appropriateness of imposing G-I zoning on the northerly parcel and requiring
the property owner to apply for a rezone to a higher density. MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
PROPOSED REZONE WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE NORTHERLY
PARCEL BE DESIGNATED G-I, GENERAL, AND THE SUBJECT
MA TIER BE REFERRED BACK TO THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT TO SET SECOND PUBLIC HEARING.-Speaking against
the motion, Councilman Clymer questioned zoning change since property
owners may have been led to believe that existing zoning would be retained
~ -..
TO: ~ <¥rG~
SUBJECT: '-tJd ~
~\
SPEED LETTER
DATE :_-"'?7"i//:----' '1'/',,+/._ 88=---L-7 ____ _
PROJECT :---loC; ..... ~~===~=:::!:~ =~Cv-~..;:.r=--__
~
"' •• I vr-Ht:NfON
~~S t L 1987
peLI~'
Ot'VELOPMF.NT I'I~,"
... • '<.:
E X H I BIT "A"
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Description
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-23-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the northerly Right-of-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 24 said point also being the existing City Limit of Renton as
annexed by Ordinances No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence northwesterly along said northerly railroad Right-of-Way Line
through the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 and through the Northeast
Quarter of said Section 23 and through the Southeast Quarter of Section 14 to
the thread of the Black River and the existing limits of the City of Tukwila;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to the
southerly Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. 153rd
st.), being also the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under Ordinances
No. 1764 and No. 1928;
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said southerly Right-of-Way Line
of Monster Road S.W. to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along the West Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road
S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 to the point of beginning.
Fl.ll-B 02/09/87
,
M E T
----
5 p 0 ( ,
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
I ~
~. ,
[
By MARY SWIFT
Staff Reporter
Dr. James Swick, fi;ed last month
as Issaquah School District superin-
tendent, plans to appeal his dismiss-
aland has asked for an open hearing
on his appeal.
. On the night the board voted
unanimously to fire Swick, Issaquah
School Board President Karen
Taylor Sherman declined uon the.
advice of counsel" to comment on
the reasons Swick was dismissed.
school.
Kauzlarich, now a grandmother, was a wide·
. eyed third grader when the school opened in
1927, a smaller version of the since~xpanded
·brick structure on Shattuck Avenue South
behind the K-Mart Store in downtown Renton.
The school is celebrating its 60th birthday, and
Kaulzarich was on hand for some of the special
festivities. .
er, was a favorite.
"She was just the sweetest thing, you know,"
Kauzlarich recalled. "Just wonderful. Of
course, ~ was a,goodie·goodie."
Kauzlarich's fondness for Sister Frances
Mariie, now dead, endured over the years. "She
even had some of my children,'" Kauzlarich,
who sent her own 11 youngsters to SI. An-
thony'S, said of the nun.
Students still wear uniforms. In tile early
days, it was navy blue skirts with sweaters and
white blouses. Stiff white cuffs and collars
were the order of the day.
nuns' dining room.
"I was practicing piano at the convent and the
sisters asked me if I'd like to have a piece of
strawberry shortcake. So they took me into
their dining room and gave it to me -on a
beautiful white tablecloth. And it was wonder-
ful! What did I do? I spilled iton the tablecloth. I
. was devastated, you know. To tell you the truth,
I put my plate over it-"
Monday, Sherman said she thinks'
an open hearing on Swick's appeal
"was in our (the board's) best inter-
As a child, Kauzlarich lived just down the
street, on Smithers, a short hop and a couple of
skips away from the newly.opened Catholic
school.
"I went to St. Edwards in Hillman City until ,
St. Anthony's opened and then. we moved to
. Renton and I went to St. Anthony's," she said.
"I made my own," Kauzlarich recalled,
laughing.
The rules were strict: No talking after recess
or lunch.
Kauzlarich chuckles at the memories now.,
Like a host of others .who got their educational
starts beneath the stern -but Kauzlarich says
gentle -gaze of the school's sisters, this week
has special meaning. .
The school observed its birthday as part of
National Catholic Schools week. ests." . .
Swick, 'who was fired in the wake
of an investigation into budget de-
ficit problems in the. district,
-·notified the board last Friday that he
would appeal. The move means
Swick will remain on the district
payroll at least· until a hearing
officer mutually agreed upon by
both sides renders a decision on the
appeal. .
. Following Swick's notice that he
would appeal, the board made public
for the first time details of· the
allegations against Swick.
In a letter dated Jan. 29 notifying
Swick of the board action, the board
identified seven reasons as probable
cause for discharge and termination
of Swick's contract.
Those included:
II Failure to properly manage and
monitor the financial condition of
the dist,rictj
II Failure to properly supervise
-personnel responsible for prepara-
, tion of the district's budget, finan-
" cial reports and budget extension;
• Failure to promptly notify the
board of an erroneous enrollment
count at Liberty High School in the
1985-86 school year and other pro-.
jected errors and the negative im·
pact those errors might have on the
district's finanCial condition; a Failure to properly resolve the
district's precarious financial can·
Horror stories about knuckle· rapping nuns
are lost on Kauzlarich, who nevertheless heard
tales from other children and,-Iater, from her
own youngsters, about the severity of Catholic
discipline.
~·We·had to line up and be still. We couldn't
say a word," she said. . The celebration kicked off Sunday, Feb. I,
with a special Mass' that included liturgical
dancing by ·11 of the school's sixth and seventh
graders, a form of worship that would have
been unheard of in Kauzlarich's day. But her childhood memories are laced only
.But the rigid expectations of the classroom
relaxed on the playground when the sisters,
clad in .their bulky black habits, occasionally
jOined the youngsters for hopscotch or other
James Swick. , ., ..
Council beefs up Renton boundaries dition'of the 1985-86 fiscal year or to
notify the board of the ongoing
discussions among distri,:t ~ta~f a lause from the 30 members of over concerns about the distrIct s By GAIL FOlKINS fiP d'
financial condition: Correspondent t ~~~ :~~: .. motivation for. this
B Presenting unrealistically posi· '. The Renton City Co~ncil .took a move, according City Policy De-
tive figures to the board in s!lpport . f~rst step toward fatteOlng cltr te~. velopment Director Larry Spring.er,
of a budget extension resolutIOn for rtto~ by 78 acres at Monday mght s .is for residents in the area to receive
the 198,5.86 fiscal year; meetlOg. Renton sewer service. Some of the
• Failure to promptly notify the The council approved two annexa-neighbors say the curre~t service
board that state school officials had tions at the meeting, both of which from a septic tank system is faulty.
refused to recognize .for filing the now are subject to approval by the "Their situation is at least a bar.
1985-86 budget extension and h~d Boundary Review Board. derline emergency case," Springer
expressed concern about the dls-Of three public hearings, covering said. He added that a departmental
triet's general 'financial condition; the two annexations and one rezone, \. review showed the city can extend
• Overspending the 1985·86 most interest was focused at the services without 'adverse impact to
budget without a properly filed Sierra Heights annexation petition. the city. .
budget extension. Council members passed the peti· Councilman Thomas Trimm ask·
Swick, reached at his Issaquah tion which would beef up the city ed if some residents along Southeast
home Monday night, declined to limiis by 33.8 acres from the Sierra I02nd Street could join the annexa-
Comment on the board's allegations. Heights neighborhood and' gaining tion at a later date, as the boundary
The Issaquah School District, 10-. ,
divided the street into one part in~An-annexation...,petiti.on for the
Renton and one part unincorpo-.l..9>ntainer Corporation on the west
rated. sfdeof-MOtiSterRoaC:l was also
Councilman Richard Stredicke passed by the council.
agreed, and said the south side of
Southeast I02nd Street should be
included in the annexed portion,
Springer said the danger in doing
this is that including more house·
holds might lower the percentage of
citizens who favor the annexation.
Seventy·five percent approval is
needed for the petition to come
before the council.
Trimm said all Sierra Heights
neighbors should realize that if their
household isn't included in the anne·
xation, they won't receive the sewer
connection.
The petition added 45 acres to the
city's northwest corner. Springer
said the company, which has a
manufacturing plant on the proper-
ty, wants annexation so it can get
sewer service.
Council members considered
whether to keep the IS acre-Black
River Quarry property at its origin-
al light industrial classification, or
change it to general use zone.
Mayor Barbara Shinpoch tabled
the issue for a week so that property
owners could be notified.
cated east of Renton, has been
steeped in turmoil since early De-
cember when school officials began
unveiling details of a 1985-86 fiscal
year budget deficit.
Classmates send giant get-well card to injured girl
Elementary School.
Two men killed in wrecks
While her second-grade class-
mates labored with pencils and
crayons on a giant "get·well" card,
8-year-old Heidi Meredith of Au-
burn remained hospitalized in seri·
ous but stable condition Monday.
undergoing trea.tment Monday for
the head injury.
In her second·grade class at
Washington Elementary School in
Auburn, Heidi's classmates Monday
were adding their individual
touches to a banner reading, "Get
Well Heidi We Miss You" in large,
First thing Monday morning, Les·
lie Weiner, Heidi's teacher, talked
with the class about the accident.
She read a Valley Daily News article
about the accident. and showed
them a picture of Auburn firefigh·
ters using mountaineering equip.
ment !o lo~er t~e injure~ ,f!,.ir.l.in a
Joyce Landes, Kyle's mother, said
parents had driven the children over
to visit another boy from Washing·
ton Elementary, whose family had
just moved to a new home on the
West Hill.
Two men died Sunday morning in
separate crashes, one involving a
stolen car.
Ronald Eugene Wickstrom, 21. of
In a second accident about 9:30
a.m., Loran J. Moesch, 27, of Bel-
levue, died after the car he was
driving struck a second vehicle in
Heidi was struck on the head by a
rolling rock Sunday morning while
she and other children were walking or".,." fpl.~" ... " 1 ...... .,. .. 0
~he c.h.i,ld~.e:n ".wereju.st.Ol~t .ta~i~g
2411G
ANNEXATION REVIEW SUMMARY
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
75% ANNEXATION
PUBLIC MEETING -FEBRUARY 2, 1987
A. SUMMARY AND LOCATION
The applicant proposes the annexation of property totalling ± 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road S.W. in the 600-1000 block.
The signature on the petition constitutes 99.8% of the assessed valuation
within the proposed annexing area. This annexation and concurrent rezone
request, file R-021-86, to M-P (Manufacturing Park) is requested in order
that sanitary sewer service may be secured for the property.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION
The city limits in the vicinity of the proposed annexation were created
by the following ordinances:
Ordinance #1745 -4/14/59
Ordinance #1764 -5/27/59
Ordinance #1928 -12/22/61
A deannexation ordinance (f11928 of 12/26/61) of property adjacent along
the northwesterly border of the site is also involved. King County
zoning of the subject property is MH (Heavy Manufacturing). In the
County's Environmentally Sensitive Area overlay, the western half of the
subject site is designated as a Class III Seismic Hazard area. In
addition, there is identified a shallow water "Wetland" section in the
extreme northwesterly corner (running southwest-northeast).
The City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as
Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. The existing and projected use of
the site is consistent with this classification. Under Renton's proposed
Environmentally Sensitive Area regulation, two areas of sensitivity have
been identified. The area in the extreme northwesterly corner is
classified as "Very Severe" due to the existence of the wetland. In the
south-center and southeast portion along Monster Road S. W. is a "Very
Severe" designation due to slopes of 40% or greater.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
The City of Renton presently services the site with water and storm
sewer. Sanitary sewer service will be provided along with the Local
Improvement ~istrict for the property.
c
-2-
Fire service is presently provided by King County Fire District #40
located at 14810 Petrovitsky Road. Upon annexation, the City of Renton
Fire station fill, located at 211 Mill Avenue South, would serve the
property. Police patrol services on Monster Road S.W. pass adjacent to
the proposed annexation area.
D. ANALYSIS:
1. Departments evaluating the subject annexation have not found any
major problems related to their areas of responsibility as a result
of this proposal.
2. Reviewing departments have indicated that the proposed annexation
represents a logical extension of services provided by their
departments.
3. All departments indicated that service to this area could be
accommodated within existing facilities, staff, and budget resources.
4. All municipal departments support the proposed annexation.
5. At this public meeting, the City is required by RCW 35A.14.120 to
answer the following questions:
a. Will the City accept the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an
indication of intent to annex? The Policy Development
Department recommends that the Council accept the annexation
petition.
b. Will the City require simultaneous
regulations for the property? The
Department advises that the City require
of the property and recommends that M-P
the site (see later discussion).
adoption of zoning
Policy Development
simultaneous rezoning
zoning be imposed on
c. Will the City require the property to assume its proportional
share of the City's bonded indebtedness? The Policy
Development Department recommends that this requirement be
imposed.
6. City Council Resolution No. 2429 establishes policies for the
evaluation of annexation applications. The proposed annexation is
generally consistent with those poliCies favoring extension of
existing public services, falls within the City's identified sphere
of influence, and is within its general service areas.
E. ISSUE
Zoning
When this annexation application was originally filed, the proponent
(Container Corporation of America) also filed a concurrent rezone
application. However, the rezone appliation covered only that property
-3-
owned by Container Corporation ± 42 acres), as they cannot request zoning
on property not in their ownership. The remaining + 3.08 acres are owned
by King County and the Union Pacific Railroad Company. The Hearing
Examiner considered Container Corporation's request for Manufacturing
Park (M-P) zoning on January 20, 1987. This request is in conformance
with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Manufacturing
Park/Multiple Option and is consistent with the existing and developing
land uses in the vicinity. It would seem reasonable, therefore, to
impose Manufacturing Park zoning on the remaining acreage also.
E. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the foregoing analysis, the Policy Development Department
supports the various City departments' recommendations for approval of
the requested annexation and rezone. If Council concurs in these and
those of D-5 above, the Policy Development Department recommends that
Council approve the petition application and impose Manufacturing Park
zoning on the additional ± 3.08 acres and that the Policy Development
Department be instructed to submit a Notice of Intent package to the King
County Boundary Review Board pursuant to existing policy.
)"
CHI('AC.O MI LWAUKE€
_._. _.-. _._._ .!!!!!L ...... ::_ ;:. :.'=' ==Fc~=-'
SOUT
AREA
I 1
",-
~--,---,--
j
\
\
\
'-"-\
\
~
CORP,
OF ... Mr:RltA
--...... _...-
I
I
!
J
I
If
\ nOS4<. \
\ Tot.1
\
\
\
.............. ~ .' ,.'
\-
PACIFIC. (.Oil.
\
\
"-"-"-, ..... .... ....
EARI.INGTDN
PAClf
--
" '.
&y----. -----t----.-+--=-~"..
I
AI L
I
I
...
~ u
<l:
0/
f-
w u
<l:
0/ ..
()
w
0/ u
CITY OF RENTON
NOT! CE OF PUBLI C HEAR I1~G
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 9th
day of __ ~F~e~b~r~u~a~r~y ____________ " 19J[L, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington,
as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following:
The 75% petition to annex property to the City filed by the Container
Corporation of America. Property consists of 45.08 acres located
along the west side of Monster Road S.W. in the 600-1000 block; known
as the Container Corporation of America Annexation. Simultaneous zoning
is recommended for the property as M-P zoning (Manufacturing Park).
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval,
disapproval or opinions on same.
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 1/18/87
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
, ,
I
~ ',I
, ,',
, :
... ':::: •. ':' .... ~~~::::~'~.:':"!:~~;~:~:.":':.:~:-~':~.-'.:"'~.', ~ •. :~.:~.; ... "'~:~~.~ •... : •. ':~-' ';!o"'; '''':'>1'.'<'' '~~'~:1 i:'~' ii, :~ .• '·T ," .. f,:' ••. : .. :.. ....... ~~~-' '.~ .• ~~:~ ..... ~~--:-, -~-j ", 0' ! I.
',' , . I"',, II I· "I'!,I 1'1 ," : . i 1,··,··,1'1:,;.,.d111"~·: ~ '., . • " . r' "',1":,, , .• "l'·.j.·~.l~,.,'" .. ',
I' ',"'" " ',' -"I
1
NOTICE
;-1
, ' , : RENTON CITY COUNCIL'
. ,! ' j i". . !.j'
." I) I I .' , ; ..
. :,' .
"
" '
. '
, I'
1'1" . ~,
, '
, I
MY AND ALL INTERESTED' /' ' . J. I r-, :-.
PERSONS ARE INVITED TO~~ "
l . : I: .,
PRESENT TO~VOICE:IAPPROVALJ ! I . . 'I"
, . . ~ I 'I
DISAPPROVAL OR oPINIONS: i
ON SlV1E.
, ,
'; '.
I: t .. , :
i.~
{ . ..~ I'
, .
i; ~:
I,: I'
Ii, ' i ' I! !'
, ,,' J I,: "
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR,
January 14. 1987
Mr. John Gardner
Container Corporation of America
7000 S. 143rd Street
Renton. WA 98055
CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 I
Subject:. Public Hearing Container Corporation of America Annexation
Dear Mr. Gardner:
The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of December 15. 1986.
set the date of February 9. 1987. 8:00 p.m .• Second Floor Council
Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building as the time and place for
consideration of the 75% Intent to Annex petition filed by your firm.
Please plan to be present in the event the City Council has any
questions concerning this matter.
I
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any further
questions.
Yours truly.
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor. CMC
City Clerk
· -..,
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR.
January 14, 1987
Mr. Robert Nichols
Regional Manager,.
Property Management
Burlington Northern Railroad Company
999 Third Avenue
Seattle, \~A 98104
CITY CLERK • (20S) 235-250 I
Subject: Public Hearing for Container Corporation of Amercia Annexation
Dear Mr. Nichols:
The attached Public Hearing Notice is forwarded to you for your
information.
Please contact this office if you have any questions.
Yours truly,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor, CMC
City Clerk
Ene.
DATE __ J_an_u_a_ry;;.....7_,_1_98_7 ____ _
The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Members of the City Council
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We, the undersigned owners of not less than 75 percent in value, according to assessed
valuation for general taxation, of the property herein described and as per plat or map
attached thereto .. and by this reference made a part hereof, respectfully petition the
City of Renton that the following described property be annexed to the City of
Renton, under provision of RCW 35A.14.120 through 35A.140.150, as amended, and;
We the undersigned, further agree to the assumption of the pro-rata share of the
pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City, the acceptance ·of provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code as pertains to the area to be annexed, all as
more particularly set forth in the regular minutes of the City Council of the City of
Renton dated Dec""vn.).,....... [~/Cf'f?b , to wit:
ON MOTION BY COUNCILMAN C I ¥ me r-, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN Sred icb:c: , THE 10 PERCENT PETITION WAS
ACCEPTED AND CIRCULATION OF THE ATTACHED 75 PERCENT PETITION WAS
AUTHORIZED.
Proponent:
Conta1ner Corporat10n r1ca
Renton, Wa 98055
Dated: January 7, 1987
NAME 'I
C DI'\-tC1i "Q~ CorrO '-'+:"" of.
.f1rt1.e r .. c::'~
\C\"j Co"",
D;vihim
",
ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
... ~
CITY 0' RENTON
PLANNING DBPARTMENT
. ,I
,.
I' II
I
', .
I'
; , '
i~~IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S,· "'J
I
!:l~· REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: __ -L~_a.I_ ..... ~...."._,,--______________ _
DATE C IRCULA TED: .J.Lff.&!...J,;G;l!:I!=\:)Jt'>Ul<z ... -I2!O.-_3.4<11-,-J..;1 9;L<¢~c'o~ COMMENTS DUE: ,) A-fl.). I;'> I 9 8 7 , )
ECF -J..I22.. -~ .
APPLICATION NO(S).--IW:=....;A~ ____________________ _
PROPONENT: C OIVT e. I wt:; If? Co e...p oF-t. MEg Ie r-.
PROJECT TITLE:_...ll .... lwQ ...... ______________________ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (:., Q Ql .\ C f\"S \ a 1'0 :tD \::..q J:,.,\ E>l
}'c Q.ES Lc C B ,M RT (In, <.\-V I \:" K, CD OAPe !=, S") ---ra
LOCATION: 7000 SDI II I1 I Y::;' R~ $,
45. ()'i$
H\--f c \\~
SITE AREA: Lj 2-() t l\u:.S;5 BUILDING AREA (gross) :_-,--_____ _
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
3) Wat er
nts 4) PIa
S) An1m als
6) Ene rgy and Natural Resources
7) Env ironmental Health
8) Lan d and Shoreline Use
9) Hou sing
10) Aes theties
11) Lig ht and Glare
12) Ree reation
13) His torie and Cultural Preservation
14) Tra
1S) Pub
16) Uti
COMMENTS:
nsportation
lie Services
lities
,ECOMMENOATION: @ONS
~VIEWEO BY: ~1~
.. c/.· . -.',
MINOR
IMPACT
/'
V-
MAJOR
IMPACT
o MITIGATED DNS
MORE
INFORMATION
o EIS
FORM 014
REVISED 9/10/85
-'.' ,."
:VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S T
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: __ ..3l.1 __ .,.....:.-,:;....'--=-.z...'"T~..LI-=4t!!!!-.l!!$ _________ _
DATE CIRCULATED: ...1J):;.c~...J.G::.!I!-\~I)~C:;.l5.I2~....;:3u.1"T"1...J1..::9l...2.:l...!1.<!O"-COMMENTS DUE: ,) 1\.1\.). I? I 19£7
ECF-~-~·
APPLICATION NO(s)o--'W:;...;A"'-____________________ _
PROPONENT : C 0 I\JT PI I \J (;: if Co g, e 0 F: t..!L\ F.e Ie I?-
PROJECT TITLE:_...tl...!) .... Q~ _____________________ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 1\9 ~l .\ C p,:s-\ D 0 :tn h-,) N 12 '"
gQES lee e, MDRn 4-Va,le? Co OQl?epLs') \0
} ; -
LOCATION: 7000 SD\ II \-\ ! LP, 2\) $,
45· <)3<.
UtE C. \\~
SITE AREA: L.l 5""·0 t l\c.g,s;:s BUILDING AREA (gross): _______ _
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear
2) Air
') Wat
4) PIa
5) Ani
6} Ene
7} Env
8) Lan
9} Hou
10) Aes
11) Lig
l2} Rec
13) His
14) Tra
15} . Pub
16} Uti
COMMENTS:
th
er
nts
mals
rgy and Natural Resources
ironmental Health
d and Shoreline Use
sing
thetics
ht and Glare
reation
toric and Cultural Preservation
nsportation
lic Services
lities
RECOMMENDATION: DNS
MINOR
IMPACT
//
-,/
MAJOR
IMPACT
D MITIGATED DNS
MORE
INFORMATION
o EIS
REVIEWED BY:.-J~~~s;;:2~=:::::::::---TITLE: UrILrry rFtJhNI;ER
DATE: 1/ (p /8'. . .L-7 ____ _
... ;,.: .' "-...
FORM 1114
REVISED 9/10/85
. -. ~
·, ':~VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S' '''f
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: __ D ..... -"-"E .. ___ SE.,£tt: ...... N= ___________ _
DATE CIRCULATED:, .J.J);c'='..I:F:.!!:~:.lJ\ t)Ule;;;J-I2So-_3.l.41'-r1-1~9;L.2-'1.Ji.1o!... COMMENTS DUE: .. J:.tlI\u:l\u)......!1_3.1..),....J-19::J..J:lB...!7~_
ECF -J.D2,. -.s.k. '
APPLICATION NO(s) .---l:W~A~ ____________________ _
PROPONENT: COm f\ I W[7 if en e..e oF-1. fL\ t;g \c (:.,
PROJECT TITLE:_..Jl ... )/,.;ClbL. ______________ ......... _______ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 1\ \> Ql.\ C p..-s-\ D U :tl) );;"p W s::.l
1>.( (? Fe:, lc c e. , "'W"T t?D, <:\-Y I" I". ( D OAge !:::, S, J \0
LOCATION: 7 000 ;s D\ \ '\ \-I, I Y:;' 2 S) S,
45· () 'is
UtE C \\~
SITE AREA: LI 2· 0 t l\cgc;:c:... BUILDING AREA (gross): _______ _
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
3) Wat er
4) P1a nts
5) Ani ma1s
6) Ene rgy and Natural Resources
7) Env ironmental Health
8) Lan d and Shoreline Use
9) Hou sing
10) Aes the tics
11) Lig ht and Glare
12) Rec reation
13) His
14) 'Tra
toric and Cultural Preservation
nsportation
15) Pub
16) Uti
COI+tENTS:
lic Services
lities
RECOMMENDATION: ~ DNS
MINOR
IMPACT
f.-.-'"
,/'
,/
~
/..,../'
~
V-
V J_
~
"./"
~
V
/
V
V
, '
MAJOR
IMPACT
D MITIGATED DNS
, MORE
INFORMATION
, '
o EIS
REVIEWED By:_9_L.~LL~b<q..~.::;j~2!.:~u6<:::!-~==---TITLE : __________ _
J
DAff; -=-' ________ ' -4-0.::r0:....!:!cP-L?-----FORM 014
REVISED 9/10/85
i,t.'. t.:, . , .:.'-.
~IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S 1
J
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: :t f Al""'P\<; . .
DATE CIRCULATED: T;ec.p.\ M12 3/ , 9 210 COMMENTS DUE: ,)!\ttl. , 3 19B 7 j ;
ECF -J.D2.. -.i&... .
APPLICATION NO(S).,--IW=.,;A:..!-____________________ _
PROPONENT: C Om A \ Wf; If? Co e.e 0 F-t. ILl r;g Ie (l>.
PROJECT TITLE:_...!l .... )'-IA:l...... _____________________ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: l\» \?l.IC f\3" \ D 10 "J]) );;,.,\,> N t':: =:.I.
gQES LcC\.?I ,MRAR:D, '* k'\t.,)C? CO OBPCCLS'> IQ
LOCATION: 7000 .s Dl \ \ \-\ I Y;;' R S) S,
45· 0'6
IIj·f: c. \T~
BUILDING AREA (gross): _______ _
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
3) wat er
4) PIa nts
5) Ani mals
6) Ene rgy and Natural Resources
7) Env ironmental Health
8) Lan d and Shoreline Use
9) Hou sing
10) Aes the tics
11) Lig ht and Glare
12) Ree reation
13) His torie and Cultural Preservation
14) Tra nsportation
15) Pub
16) 'Uti
COMMENTS:
lie Services
lities
RECOMh ,AllON:
REVIE.
~S
MINOR
IMPACT
~
V-
I./'
V-
£./' .
V
/~
v
v
[....
V
~
V
V
V
//
,
MAJOR
IMPACT
o MITIGATED DNS
MORE
INFORMATION
~
D. EIS
TITLE: __________ _
DATE: //:r /i? 1 ~~~j~~,4-~~---------FORM 014
REVISED 9/10/85
:.' .~: .. " . ". -
. ,.1. r-.',_ .. '.;",-~,~~{7' }.~ :;:·:·i-:~\" .. : ... ~ .... ~~'-:.:,,! .\.:_~_'t ... 7,'..'7:'.:.: •. , ,.:.;!~''7.:,~:.~;,.::.~{.-,;.,~: ,,:·'·:;:;~:·,'r::·~·;:::..\-:. ~,:.-:1..:-.. ;;¥'t~::.,·."Y· .. \'~\~,:-.:J:: .. :.:.;.:;~.: .. !.,y.,;.·,·
':;VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW !:r j
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ___ -.... 7_z::;,aoO_"1L.L1..,1l ....... ,; __ --~.:_. ______ _
DATE CIRCULATED: ...... lli......" ... -F::.:::tJ..\"'/\....,c:; .... -I2 ____ 3 ... 1<-r-..... 19.L"'-''Z .... lo<.... COMMENTS DUE: .... )..cI\""fI. ... )~ . ..L1_3'-,-.J....19~B..L7_·_ 1 --;
ECF -.l.JB.. -~ .
APPLICATION NO(s) .--l:W=-:p,~ ____________________ _
PROPONENT: C om A \ \-.J(;: e Co e...e 0 F-t iL\ Fe Ie ~
PROJECT TITli: __ ~l~)wA~ ____________________________________________ __
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: f\9 S;u c &1' \ D iU :0) );.,\,} W IF. >l
M.Q.ES LcC£\ ,MR-yl2D, <\-V)"I(, co OAI?CnS,) TO
LOCATION: 7 000 .:s DI \ i \-\ I y:?> Q S\ S\
45'. () '6
Il±f C rr~
BUILDING AREA (gross) : ________ __
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL EliMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
:5) Wat er
4) P1a nts
5) Ani mals
6) Ene
7) Env
8) Lan
9) Hou
10) Aes
11) Lig
12) Ree
D) His
rgy and Natural Resources
ironmental Health
d and Shoreline Use
sing
theUes
ht and Glare
reaUon
torie and Cultural Preservation
14) Tra nsportaUon
15) Pub
16) UU
COMMENTS:
lie Services
liUes
RECOMMENDATION: ~ DNS
MINOR
IMPACT
~
>V
.X-
X
\,
./
y:
V .y
X
'X X,
X
X.
~
V
MAJOR
IMPACT
D MITIGATEO DNS
MORE
INFORMATION
D ·EIS
REVIEWED By:_---J-==:::....::~~::..:::..*f-l-!-. ..::::~~..:..:d::::.·~TlTli: _______ _
DATE: __ ~/_-.::=.2::....-~~~7~----
;,~ •• ':-' '~.' -. 0,' •• ' • ~ •
FORM tl14
REVISED 9/10/85
'~\:WIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW r "··'h
REVIEWING OEPARTMENT: __ -"'I& .... ' ... UlD __ c&.,..,'--_____ ..." .. ,.... _______ _
DATE CIRCULATED: ..s.J)=.c-=~F;;.iiU-::l.\.Ll6l,;;C;5.R_.......,l3'"'"I..-Jl..::9l..Jg~lo'_ COMMENTS QUE: J t\ !U. I:'> 19 B 7
J )
ECF -..1..f2.2.. -~ .
APPLICATION NO(s).---J;W:::.-.;A-'-____________________ _
PROPONENT: COI\JTf?\\\Jrne Co e..p oF-t.1LI!;&' \e 0>.
PROJECT· TITLE:_-'l .... luA _______________________ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 1\ 9 \\.\C 1\1" \ a 10 ""1]). !>...p "-" E. 'i
MQES lee e. ,ME·TI2D, ± t'lIdC co OAR"::' sJ:JJ)
LOCATION: 7000 SD\\\\-\ I LC?> 50\) S"\
45"· () 'is
D±-E C. \,~
BUILDING AREA (gross) : _______ _
IMPACT REVIEW·ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
3) Wat er
4) PIa nts
5) Ani mals
6) Ene
7) Env
8) Lan
9) Hou
10) Aes
11) Lig
12) . Rec
13) His
14) Tra
15) Pub
16) Uti
COMMENTS:
rgy and Natural Resources
ironmental Health
d and Shoreline Use
Sing
thetics
ht and Glare
reation
toric and Cultural Preservation
nsportation
lic Services
lities
,~ECOMMENOATION : ~ DNS
1EVIEWED BY: 'IP-r
MINOR
IMPACT
,-
r-
/"
/
~ ,....--
,....--
~
/
/
.",-
/"
~
~
/""
/"
MAJOR
IMPACT
D MITIGATED DNS
MORE
INFORMATION
D.EIS
TITLE: __________ _
'DAVE: /-z4~.jI!!t------FORM 1114
REVISED 9/10/85
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: __ -IA=-.JlJlIt.!!c-I!!!!U/l!C .... e ________ . _______ _
DATE CIRCULATED: .... 1):;~C.d;F:.!::(I.~\ t'>wc:..;;J-R~_3 ... 1""r1_1L..:9:J..Z ....... lo'_ COMMENTS DUE: -.lJ~I\.:.J:r..-..!).......J.1_3l-),.._.i_19~Sw7--
ECF -JiB.. -l6h. .
APPLICATION NO(s).--tI-J::...,:A:!.-____________________ _
PROPONENT: C Om Au bit: 'f' C.o e.e 0 F-.\\ iLl t=R \e ~
PROJECT TITLE :_....JI. ... )I-'A/,l...._-,..-____________________ _
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: r:., Q Ql ,\ C f\:S-1010 :D) h..\.) N s 'f,
M-Q.t=:::., Lee £\ ,M p:yRp, *' VI\:, Ie? CD QMU:( s) )Q
LOCATION: 7000 SD\\\ \-\ ! Y: 3, X'D $,
45'0 0%
DtE c \l~
S HE AREA: L.j 'f 0 () t f:.,cg Ii; S BUILDING AREA (gross): _______ _
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1) Ear th
2) Air
3) wat er
4) PIa nts
5) Ani mals
6) Ene rgy and Natural Resources
7) Env
8) Lan
9) Hou
10) Aes
11) Lig
12) Rec
13) His
14) Tra
15) . Pub
16) Uti
COMMENTS:
ironmental Health
d and Shoreline Use
Sing
thetics
ht and Glare
reation
toric and Cultural Preservation
nsportation
lic Services
lities
MINOR
IMPACT
MAJOR
IMPACT
,
. MORE
INFORMATION
RECOMMENDATION: !2a'DNS D MITIGATED DNS 0.0 EIS
REVIEWED BY:---"'~r,;;;;;:z:=o=~a~.:::.~~~~---TITLE: ~~ ~~
o ~~
FORM 1714
REVISED 9/10/85
TO:
•
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
010% NOTicE OF INTENT ~ 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdi~ & Zoni~
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:, _______ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: C(>N7IIfINEA C~II"AIIlI4tl Annexation
Date Circulated /~ 13/ 19b Date Comments Due / 1/3 I 8> 7
IGlenElralinformation:
Area: t lfS:ol' Acres Street Lengthj JlI&lJ Feet
Assessed Value (1988 ): $"5~'{'" Estimated Population: -0-I
Current Uses: #i.c.bA.1.9. A.4 bOK pL,ao,€loret.;".,...
'0.-,..,..-110" ','
Future Use:Sim: La.,.. -10 -II.. k'·.d;~ lJ IA.S
Future -Future Population: ,
Reviewing Department:_.e~~II:::t-I:!e ..... t-.JIS __________ _
,
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
'il;.5
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
New f"<tLikr(ej Wi[\ ~e.t ~ ':Ie o..(.."e1o(IPJ,
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
~O
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
, preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
AII\VI(1 }La,+(o",-lC ;::-q,vUi'<?J,
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
A~~eJ,.'t-HolA.. iJ R.ec..o~""-,, .... t.l.eJ
liii~:~;!n:±6~t'±uw~?!f:!7ht:.!::, ~' >=L-!.'...l........L.~,~:::::::_'!:::::._ :l-' .. -_ -.. -.. -_ -... -_ -_ -_ -.. -_-.,Da_te .... J_' .. / 3_'_?_? __ .-:a
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM o IO~ NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75~ ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdi~ {( Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks {( Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:, _______ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: Cf>ND9INEA CIJ8foAtlllW Annexation
Date Circulated a/sI18t... Date Comments Due 1113187
lQ,enE~ralinformation:
Area: t. 't'.s:oar Acres , Street Length.:t 3/GiJ Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $ '45~ I{I!lJ Estimated Population: -c:>-
CUrrent Uses: fic.bA.1A 4..dI:.OK pI. .ao'€ ( .. rIt .. ;".,..
'Orp.,..i\on ,
Future Use:Si""i Lt.,.. -10 -It.. k'·.d;~ "sAs
Future Homes: -Future Popul!\tion: •
Fl bL Reviewing Department:_ ... _~ ... _.JI~-= _____________ _
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
~~~,~.S'~.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area? '12~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...t. ... ,t:"..>v.
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
~.
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? Of an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
_ .:r~-
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
!l'-;;:;'c::'::;'=~;:' ~='==::z.=--____________ Date . / l.,t I /7
Signature
.1::,
"
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM 010, NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75' AN~EXATION PETITION
TO: Buildi'1I lie Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks lie Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:, _______ _
SUBJECT: C/>ND9INEA CfJlI.foAJRllJI{ Annexation
•
Date Circulated /;).131 1St.. Date Comments Due 11/31 '87
General Information:
Area: t. 'Is: 01' Acres Street Length.::t 3/$l) Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $"~ 'ifO Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: ac.b .. ,& 4,..J. bOK pL.,d-o.'£ 4 ...... :" ....
Corp ..... ilon '.'
Future Use:Simi (..,.. -10 -It. Ikd.('b~ "lAS
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population:
Reviewing Department:---i/"'ft __ ....L.J'uL!!!U''-JTL/L~ .. · ..... i--. _____ _
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems Cor your department?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
YES , ~ tJ/$ PdSI!:AITI>{ sew,,,!. ~'D f'MfEllr--(
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
l.tIlTlI et\ST_ lI'fA.ss I»V:J /JPI/l.DP€Ju.T& &tre-tS'046 tv. /lE(jw4e'.o 8'1 Fi4Z"~
. Celr...o~ $4.0 (>ItoPea:ry
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'{(;$
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
'f€-)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
(\
1~=_'(~~~A~1f.=-.::...:.!.~(L~~ ____ Date,....:.-I....!.../-.:~~I .;;;.::8{j;,...-
ISignature
.j':.
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
010% NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
TO:. Buhdi~ & Zonl~
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks ole Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other: TRa fElt:..
'SUBJECT: C4NTIIINEA Q8&AIII1W Annexation
LOCATION:I' ..... 'A ~-ti 1tII .. -.Cf::!W • ~A." .. l"'A'" J iltl __ J "-
-
Date Circulated /~ 13/ 18b Date Comments Due 1113187
General Information:
Area: tll&'Ofl Acres Street Le~th:t 31&D Feet
Assessed Value (1988 ): $ "5Hi 'f1!O Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: e..c.b .. ,A. 4.4 I:. OX pl,.«O'€lord-4in.,..
Corp.~-II&UOI ,
Future Use:Simi La ~ -:10 -H..a. kl·.d;~ LlIR.S
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: I
Reviewing Department:, __ -r-4-...IIe~~~F~~~+I..J('-____ _
1.
3.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
M:....,; """ <-,I.-r/ fJIHf-. ~~J cP.s';-/~e;..y~ t.."'j!P do)/aJr.5 dJ..rlf~ej( to...... pp¥;, {Ie 1-'< STreet-I, -r 1..-;-,-'-4 . /
Does this proposed a'rinexati6n represent a logical extension bf service$ provided by
your department?
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
4.
5.
A.,."-d. w" II bQ.. ~"""",V)Led. b'f ex,.~ T' .sril-f.f
Can this annexation be served by your department !lithin your current budget resources?.L
0411' ;-f ~ .he".. ,-?.,' .e.;<';-~.j-lv(..I"1.f..-I ..... ~j/(! ......... ..-... :::J.,
() I "-. 'P 0 s.-e.rf ,
Do you favor thisannexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? Of an alternate annexation would be
. preferred, please illustrate It on the attached map.)
A '" I.A, e:x 1L +, ~ '-t I '> ~ a.J L:l v-e.cl .
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
I!===-:-=='~":::=:'::::' ~""!'-...5<t"":"·_~I:..::..::.~~=-4~~ ___ Date /, S" BZ
Signature ~
, ,
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
010% NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
TO: Buhdi~ & Zonl~
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other: bfs "Sill &!\I6IIl1SiBI A!&
FROM: Policy Development Department
'SUBJECT: CfiNDtINEA C~8I'oAtllIMl Annexation
LOCATION:,I f A ~"ffi! m ... -j!If~ •
~ AA./"....... I .I_ .. J --
Date Circulated };)., 13/ 1St.. Date Comments Due 11131'87
General Information: ,
Area: tilE-OW Acres Street Length.:t 31Gb Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $"5~'i. Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: #i,b ........ ,.,1 bow. pI. .ttO'£ lorrtala ......
Corpll~ .. h~1l\ " ,
Future Use:Simi La I=: ~O -II.. kl·,d.i~ U s.ltS
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population:
I
Reviewing Department:, __ ~Itttf!.:.3I!..-S£.J'L..3Ic;;'a.~AJ:!!!:. _______ _
1.
3.
2.
i:
"
4. '
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
91--v
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? y~
How will your department service this annexation area? JJA
can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
y~
Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
, preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
)-~
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
6Y~rA
!"".;.:~==, {.:.' ~~~(....' ~:;;:;=t2, ~~l~=-____ Date / I L I c:t?
ISlgnature' , v (
"~I~I'~~r
it }~~~;[t~~.il~€'~~ 1!';';:PF'i:,j.")if.'WI'l';'!'!{;~?Hii"ilj(:tj!l ~!l;~1~;~),lj~~""'''~;!\~i;;'' : ".'r~'",,;:; ~"~"::':'V' ;';;'7 ~7:~'7i'W~'i";~7§;;T'''''' ,',T,-'I' .. '," "-'--, "-'" .', ~:-::--:
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM 010\\\ NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75\\\ ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdi~ &: Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks &: Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:, _______ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: C/>NTlfINEA CIJIlMfIlIlJ/'l Annexation
Date Circulated /~ / 31 /8t.. Date Comments Due / / /3/ 8> 7
IG1ene·ral Information:
Area: t lfS:ol' Acres , Street Length:t 31$b Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $ ~~ C(IH:J Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: a~b"1'" 4"..,l bolt pI. art6'E' lord-a;".,..
CorpoN.ilort\ ,
Future Use:S;.",i f,. &e "0 -Ik ki.di~ lJ &.lts
imated Future Homes: -Future Population:
" Reviewing Department: 2,.0 U \t.l.
any your
(DO
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
.j~,
How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
~lJIGDIf\)Co P6ZvYln'S J CVlDlruCo fL!1l\JD0Se \NfOo
Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'j~.
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (Ir an alternate annexation would be
, preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
r.\...VlYJ MENDATION on n:
RtGO\'YHVl 8Y\JO ~l\)I'\Jt;fPrtlalV q AUJ ?RopEP,;r(
~ R"e.zorvro 10 WIDtDR..VYlAI\)C( WITH THC
Clli~ GOMPRc \-\\2NSIVc: fLp\rJ,
iUitii;;e---..:::::o.....L-~~7\--\--,:--1.C:~~--Date '/ / 2. / <37
ANNEXATION REVIEW POR' o IO~ NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75~ ANN'EXATION PE11TION
TO: Buhdi~ & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:, _______ _
SUBJECT: CDN1'iIINEA Cf)llfoAlllltJl'l Annexation
•
Date Circulated /~ 13/ Iflt.. Date Comments Due 11/3187
General Information:
Area: t.lfs:oar Acres Street Lengthj 31Gb Feet
Assessed Value (19S& ): $ ~5~ "f4PO Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: lic.bA1& 4wl bOK pL.aO'! Co",..:".,...
COrp.,....ilon '.'
Future use:Sjm:(..oe"O -II... k'·.d;~ ".AS
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: ,.
Reviewing Department: __ 1?> ...... ~(~D_r...;G-=_· ________ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department? NO
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? ,I
yES
2. How will your department service this annexation area? $""",,-= ~
{5/Q. I-A "-' e-= <OF c::..l ~
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
r-t e'S
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? af an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
LII~ •
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
01096 NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 7596 ANNEXATION PETITION
Buhdi~ & Zoni~
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police en, uf' RENTON
Public Works
Other:. _______ ...;;;JAN'1 1987
FROM: Policy Development Department POLICY
DEVElOPMH!T nFPT
SUBJECT: CMT1IINEA ClJllPlAillltW Annexation
Date Circulated /;)..131 18{., Date Comments Due 1113187
IG.ene,ralinformation:
Area: t "'S:01' Acres Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $ "5~ 'i1!P Estimated Population: -()-
Current Uses: fi..c.b&.,.I. 4,.4 bolt pJ..a~'E' lord-a;".,.
Corp.,..i'on .
Future Use:Sima La.,.. '#0 -H... U.O,di"tl "".As
Future Homes: -Future Population: ,.
Reviewing Department::_-IE:...J.I.JNUl!.~NNII, .. t __ · _______ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department? NO -3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? YB
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area? uTI u 11 E: 'S>
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'10·
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? af an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.) '-{D
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
f(P p JLO lj c;-
, -
~~lI1i~~~·~~·~;tt(·~e;ti;,:~~~::..':~7:'~!~,"{";'.:.;;'··-:'*"~~"o/r.}';i,#-:r.~"'.:_:-;:;. .•. ';. "'i>:H::'~\'''''' ""," '-'l·.~_-"~': '.~.-';:-"-·7·7·"~---~·~--:._-p;;r .• ';"'"1'-:-,,-,,-.. -,.. -.,=7."!' " . -:: --;::---.-~~
TO:
II
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
010% NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
• Bulldi~ <Ie Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks <Ie Recreation
Police
Ci I T uf RENTON
.I;\N i
Public Works POLICY Other:. ________ llJPMlOPMf.I'lT OFPT
FROM: Policy Development Department
. SUBJECT: CfWntiNEA C/JSPoAIIIIW Annexation
,nuN:11 J JIll tI!'i-E -. .. -• 1If~
..4. ..... fIi88itl_-I..
Date Circulated I~ 13/ Iflt. Date Comments Due /1131'87
I,. Information:
Area: tl.J£Ofl Acres Street Length:! 3/S/) Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $"5~'f'" Estimated Population: -c::>-
Current Uses: lic.bA,.8. 4..J. 1.0_ ph a±o'€ lodt..;".,. .. Corp.edo-ll~~ .. . .
Future Use:Simi La Ie ~O -II.... kl·.ni~ Lt a.4s
.~ ". •• '" Future Homes: -Future Population:
,.
Reviewing Department:._--te~.!In~c..!!I!!!..II..l1C,-.IIC _________ _
1.
3.
2.
4.
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems Cor your depart ment?
/I/cJ
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? ~
How will your department service this annexation area?/.? __ /_
. aff~~~
can this annexation be served by your department within your c~~nt budget resources?
/~
Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
. preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.) y ~
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
% .=
'f"' .... _
,
~ ..
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM o IO~ NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75~ ANNEXATION PETITION
TO: Buhdi~ & Zoni~
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works Other:. ________ _
. SUBJECT: Cf>NT1# IMEA CfJllfoAillIW Annexation
LOCATION:" _<fit Jd' r A -:lI ... -.. ""--.d~·
~AA .. 1~--J ,,_ . .. •
Date Circulated !{).., 3118t, Date Comments Due 1,13, '87
General Information:
Area: 't1lG."W Acres Street Length:t 3/GlJ Feet
Assessed Value (1988 ): $ "5~ 1(4!C . Estimated Population: -c:>-
Curre~t Uses: Q..c.b .. ,A. 4.4 1,0. pI. a+o"£ lo,m..,,, ....
Corp.,..-fl&uo, ...
Future Use:Simi r. ~ ~O -Ita. ki.d-i~ LJ s.D.S
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population:
Reviewing Department: C. I B r ~ It \I
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your depart ment?
AIo
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? .
~5
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
W/fh (!N .. {5f(;'~ .f'4.c:-/i'!Jes
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
f/e..s
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? af an alternate annexation would be
. preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
~VOy A hhe'f;t;I-Il/~ .
. rJIll>ARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
.li~.;!,:!"::=:iI~:::;a~~\I:::r~"" ... ~ ......... '·~.-u _4_~_~::~::~:~:::::::::::.D_a .. te_. ,;z __ I..,Ja. .. t:l.h.,_1 ... 9.t_7_ ...
~~~·~!ir:(~rfi':;~;·'.-r .. ":~,~':~! t~'~~, '!'7:~\·,:~;'.H··':.~;;~.-:-",-:,. ':~::: (F,'.' ~I;;;~!'''r-'!,,, :til .. '''"'' 1,,""1 ;;"r.,'~'."",.·,,~h .. -... ,., '.' .•• ' "".-., -'. ~ ... ,. .. -..... ~ .. ~,-... ---.-.-
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
010% NOTICE OF INTENT ~ 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
Buildi'lf & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other:, _______ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
. SUBJECT: Cf>NTIIINEA C/JIlItJAIIIIW Annexation
Date Circulated /.;1.131 18t.. Date Comments Due 1 1131 '87
IG1ene:ral Information:
Area: t. If.,s:ol' Acres Street Length3.3/$D Feet
Assessed Value (198& ): $"5~c(~ Estimated Population: -0-
Current Uses: #ic.l:A.1.IL 4...4 bOK pI. .ab'€ lord-..;".,...
Corp.,..ilon ...
Future Use:Sjmi f,. r -10 -II... k'·sf.;~ lJ S.Q.S
imated Future -Future Population: ,.
Reviewing Department:, _________________ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
. preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.) .
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
'.
1""_-.-__________________ Date,--:..._...!.I __ -"/~ __
Signature
x
~\~A6«\"~".) ~~\\\ln'lI\~':)
...,.....,... ~z. P.b.~ ... .taJltoN\ ~~ ,,~~ -te9lUJ
"'ao\8 OOO\-~
, .. .. . '\ \
~ '.'"
.
~ ,... • c... " ..•
~~\£,t. ~cs~'t'!
-<:>-CAy ~~~ ~
...,.,.; .. tho~ ~6+"..Jq "o0 ~~ ""r.6:h~
,..orl-...,.".,o":)
2..S\.ao t:'h..,~ . .l\~ or .... ..J;H\i2 .•
• •
SUFFICIENCY OF THE PETITION
On .December 3o-i2:l.. 198 b , the undersigned
commenced a determination of the sufficiency of the 75% petition for annexation
in the G"'±tLj!f\."'I" CPV'poc .... -hOh. o('Amerr'cQL annexation, which petition
requested the annexation of the real property described in Attachment A
attached hereto, and which has been filed with the City of Renton
on ! De CL'?vnk.r I C). th.-198~.
2245G
December 15. 1986
Annexation: Container
Corporation of America
10% Annexation &
Rezone
CONSENT AGENDA
Claim: Peck, CL-67-S6
CAG: 080-86,
Puget/Talbot/SR-515
Widening, Signalization &
Channelization
Boundary Adjustment
Tukwila/Renton
• ~ . ;
;
./
Renton City Council Minute Page 167
Followins discussion, it was MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY
REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 10% PETITION
AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 75% PETITION. MOVED BY
KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION
TO CONCUR IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. CARRIJ':D.
ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL INSTRUCT POLICY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO INCLUDE TIlBo STRIP OF
PROPERTY AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF TH:2 SrrE TO ENABLE
STRAIGHTENING OF THE CITY BOUNDARY. CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having 1)eeil posted, published and
mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the
public meeting to consider the Container Corpo.1!tion .:If America 10%
Annexation Petition and Rezone. The proposal, consisting of 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000 block,
includes a concurrent rezone to M-P, manufactudng "ark, zone to allow
installation of sanitary sewer service to ;he subject "ite for future
development. The rezone application wjJJ be nvie'~'ed initially by the
Hearing Examiner since the applicant is requesting a more intell3ive zoning
classification than R-I or G-I.
Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the
subject site, reviewed staff recommenuations, and suggested that a public
hearing to consider the 75% Annexation Petition and Hearing Examiner's
recommendation on the rezone be set on February 9, 1986. He recommended
that Council accept the 10% annexation petition, require simultaneous
adopt!t)n of zoning regulations for the property, and require the property to
assume its proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness.
Upon inquiry, Mr. Springer described location and ownership of buildings
and other amenit;p,s on the subject site, and designated location of proposed
boundary '><!tweern cities of Renton and Tukwila following completion of
annexation procedures by both cities. He also noted that King County zoning
is heavy manufecturing for the entire site, and property to the east is part of
the Oakesdale Avenue Local Improvement District. MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AND
ACCEPT THE 10% ANNEXATION PETITION, REQUIRE
SIMULTANEOUS ADOPTION OF ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
PROPERTY, REQUIRE THE PROPERTY TO ASSUME ITS
PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS,
AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 75% ANNEXATION
PETITION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY
MATHEWS, COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
75% ANNEXATION PETITION AND REZONE ON FEBRUARY 9,1986.
CARRIED.
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing. At Council request, items 6.c. and 6.d. were re'moved for separate
consideration.
Claim for damages in the amount of $691.84 filed by Mary C. Peck, 4106 NE
24th, Renton, for plumbing expenses allegedly incurred due to plugged City
water line (J 1/25/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
City Clerk reported bid opening 12/3/86 for South Puget Drive/Talbot Road
South/SR-5IS Widening, Signalization and Channelization project; two bids
received; Engineer's estimate: $100,803.92. Refer to Transportation
Committee.
Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set to consider
the Renton-Tukwila boundary adjustment. Council concur and set hearing
for January S, 1987.
MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED.
"
December 15, 1986
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
CITY STAFF IN
ATIENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
PUBLIC MEETING
Annexation: Covenant
Development
Company/Covenant
Church 10% Petition and
Rezone
t
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
NANCY L. MATHEWS, Council President; JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M.
STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER, ROBERT J. HUGHES, EARL
CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Policy
Development Director;' LT. H. RAY CALDWELL, Police Department
Gail Folkins, Valley Daily News
MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8, 1986, AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and
mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Shinpoch opened the
public meeting to consider the Covenant Development Company/Covenant
Church 10% Annexation Petition and Rezone. The proposal consists of 23.7
aCres located along the south side of SE Carr Road, approximately 1,350 feet
east of Talbot Road South. Simultaneous rezoning to R-I, single family
residential, zone is recommended for the subject site with the exception of
the southeast corner proposed for P-I, public, zone to allow construction of a
water storage tank by the City of Renton. Multifamily development on the
remainder of the site is anticipated following application for rezone to a
higher density zone by the Hearing Examiner.
Referring to a vicinity map of the area, Policy Development Director Larry
Springer designated the location of the subject site and provided general
information regarding the proposal. He recommended that a long,
rectangular parcel located northeast of the site (Tax Lot 257) be included in
the annexation scope to provide a straight City boundary line. If desired by
Council, owners of that parcel will be contacted to join the annexation. Mr.
Springer noted that concerns expressed by the Police Department regarding
increased traffic problems on Carr Road would best be addressed at a later
date when site development occurs. He concluded by recommending that the
Council accept the annexation petition, require simultaneous adoption of
zoning regulations for the property, and require the property owners to
assume their proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness.
Audience comment was invited. Mrs. Kenneth Harders, 10017 SE Carr Road,
Renton, owner of two-acre parcel west of the subject site, questioned
ownership and maintenance of adjacent property, noting previous damage
from storm water and rocks from ravine area. Mr. Springer noted that the
problem would be investigated and a report provided to Mayor, Council and
Mrs. Harder.
Gerald Edlund, landscape architect, represented his mother, Mrs. G. B.
Edlund, 10130 SE Carr Road, Renton. He advised that proposed R-I zoning
would create a non-conforming use for their nursery operation, and felt that
single family zoning development would be undesirable due to impacts from
noise, exhaust and traffic from Carr Road. Mr. Edlund indicated desire to
improve isolated situation of his property, which is cut off from the south by
the canyon and from the north by Carr Road; and expressed desire to expand
the existing nursery operation in the future. Upon Council inquiry, Mr.
Edlund advised that any building expansion for the nursery operation would
be non-conforming in King County.
Upon further Council inquiry, Mr. Springer designated on the map the
location of the proposed P-I zoning, and identified environmentally sensitive
areas in which a stream corridor and steep slopes are located.
has been unable to be contacted. I tried on Friday to reach the owners
and did late in the afternoon, but the owner's wife preferred that her
husband speak. I left our number to call and requested that he contact
us by Monday or Tuesday.
4. ~COritainer Corporation ofl\iiiirrica-Annexafion-(4-hOUrS)~
John Gardner called on Tuesday about the potential short plat of the
property (± 3 acres) they sold to Metro. Gardner told me that he had
phoned the individuals in King County that I recommended, and they sent
him some material on the short subdivision procedure. I asked him if the
County officials had given him any indication of a decision. He said no,
but that he would study the materials and try to get back to me this week
with an answer. I advised him of the December 15th public meeting date
and the importance of an answer on the short plat soon.
Gardner phoned again on Thursday about the property in the southeast
corner of this proposed annexation. It has appeared that the sale of it
to Metro may have required a short plat. Gardner spoke with King County
officials and the property is evidently exempt from the short subdivision
requirements because Metro is a public utility. I requested that he send
us a copy of the County's standards on it with a cover letter indicating
what he has found out.
5. Environmental Review Committee (3 hours)
The item reviewed was a Conditional Use Permit request for gasoline pumps
associated with a Site Approval application for a convenience store in a
8-1 zone on a parcel between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street west of
Jefferson Avenue N.E. There were two separate previous Site Approval
requests on these sites for a car wash and a convenience market. The car
wash was denied by the Hearing Examiner and the ERC never received
additional requested material for the other, so it was dismissed. The
new application represents a merger of the two sites with substantially
improved site design. Generous landscaping buffers are provided, and the
internal circulation is better with off-site improvements adding to a
more efficient traffic flow. We advised that a restrictive covenant be
placed upon the property prohibiting any future development in the large
landscaped area of the center east portion. We also recommended that the
entire proposal be shifted five (5) feet to the east to provide an even
larger buffer for the multiple family housing to the west.
6. Annexation Procedures (2 hours)
I directed a memorandum to the Public Works Director requesting that we
be provided with copies of all future "Covenant to Annex" documents filed
with that department. We probably have most of .. the previous ones, and
the bulk of these have been mapped. However, we need to insure that we
always receive them. I also had Willis set up a separate folder for
"Legal Opinions" regarding annexation questions. As you suggested, I am
also incorporating a red (anticipated date) and black (actual date)
designation system for the file labels to indicate when the major steps
in the process have occurred. I am finishing the individual file labels
so Carolyn can fill in the same material on the "Status of Annexations"
sheet.
, !>,'
villains.. " .'
"They tore up the building
made a mess out of things," Koch
sai~. They also took Useven or '
in progress and items
hadn't been delivered to the food
bank yet. .
Renton council 'eyes
possib.le· annexations
. . . t
'Covenant Church property owners
By GAIL FOLKINS to distribute a petition that says
Correspondent landowners agree to the bonded
Renton city officials· Monday . indebtedness, and to the city com·
night considered the annexation of prehensive plan and 'zoning mea~
'two parcels of land, a 23-acreCoven-,sures.I' ~ .J'-',1 ~ .. ~
ant Church parcel near'Southeast The second parcel.considerei:l by
.Carr. Road : City Council.me.,!,bers is_4S.acres.
owned by the Container Corp .. of
I\merlciCThe;land-iSlocated along
the~west-side of Monster Road
• 'I' . ,Staff phOto by, JIM BATES
Kent Monday '. v
The Covenant Church imnexation, . Soutb.west in the 600·1,000 block.
located along the south' side of Container Corp. of America reo
Southeast Carr Road east of Talbot . quested the annexation in hopes of
Road South, is necessary before the securing city sewer service for the ~\;$tOO, 000 loss
, '. . .
city can build a water storage tank in • property. .
the southeast corner of the parcel. '.. The container company is part of
The ·remainder .of ·the property local improvement districts for
would be used for multi· family . roads and sewers, but must join the
", h /', '. j
used axes to chop holes
'io get' inside the build·
three of the 22 individu·
the 11,000·square·foot
re destroyed and others nor to moderate sinoke
mage, he said.
ltd faulty wiring in one
:ed bays was determined
ostigators to have spark.
.C' the tenants whose
•. destroyed by the fire I. _.
were not available. DeHart said it housing. city of Renton to take advantage of
appeared they were used for', Some property owners questioned the sewer utility. .
storage. . . . . the value of a Renton annexation to .' City officials agreed to.consider
Tenants whose bays and property . them. tho-annex.request,:.and\'a public
were damaged include Bronze Cast, Jerry Edlund, who owns part of {hearing will be held Feb. 9 to further
Central Properties, Olympic Roof· the Covenant Church property, said 'discusnh,qmm.
Man arrested after attack
ing, Eden Ross, a rock band whose the parcel should not be zoned for
name was not available and Heinz residential use because the car noise
Damsalla, who was storing two and exhaust from Carr Road make it
Porsche sportscars under repair in a undesirable for residences. . d
small bay next to where the fire "I've owned a nursery operation. on woman an rescuer
started, DeHart said. The cars had for some time, and the land is suited. A man was arrested after alleged
smoke and heat damage.' to the purpose," he said. Using the Iy assaulting a woman at a dOWIl
property for a nurser'y gives open t~wn Auburn tavern and then using,
ks to quiz' officials
green . space, and yet the noise piece of glass to attack a man wh
doesn't affect it, he added. came to her aid.
Edlund, who is' a professional Auburn police said the 44-year-ol,
landscape architect, said that in his suspect was booked for investiga
professional capacity the land tion of felony assault after th
would not serve well for residential incident Saturday night. 'ffects. .
>d resident Paul Rolling·
have plenty of questions
"Wednesday night, par· .
ince Olympic recently
~. original spill estimate
) to 80,000 gallons. "I'm
someone didn't tell us
minger said. '
also announced that air
s inside and outside area
';i ,promising results of
,done .. Absher said offi··
n·the. University of
!n . noted that damage
linimal., . 'I
~y, Wednesday nigh I the
I will release new infor-
the impact of the 80,000 e added.
r, one 'Of eight residents ,
who had to evacuate his house
because of fumes, said he doubted
that such air quality tests could be
completed so quickly, and he plans
to find out more at the open forum.
"One of the most obvious questions,
of course, is the question of health
impact, but we'll have others. I think
they might be shaking over' what
we'll ask them." .
At the last spill hearing in mid-
November, about 40 residents of the
Maplewood area walked out after
Olympic officials wouldn't agree to
hire an independent consultant,
Consultants from the Seattle·King
County Health Department and
Olympic have jointly taken and
studied air samples to see if resi-.
dents are' breathing unhealthy
levels of petroleum fumes.
.,. ... ,1 'J " ~ .
reported stolen from Auburn airport :·,.'.1 '" ":. . !~ngine airplane valued at Airport.
aS,reported stolen from its Auburn police said the owner of
'.' -, ..•. "''' "' .. -'~:~-' , ....... ,07Q ..... "A .. l P;npr l.noce. a 40-
use. He added that he would like to The victims suffered cuts an
talk further to city officials about bruises, but declined treatment at
zoning the land so that he could hospital, polcie said.
expand his nursery operation. Officers were told the 44·year·ol
" "Under current zoning I can have began assaulting a woman at th
the existing buildings, but I.can't tavern, and wheri three men intel
build additional structures,"he said. vened. one of them was cut on'th
Following Edlund's comments, ear in a scuffle.
council members decided to accept
the 10 percent annexation and re-
zone petition. It is now up to the
ElliotBridge closes
during daylight hours
Due to damage from a traffic
accident, Elliot Bridge on Jones
Road' east of Renton will be closed
during daylight hours today, Wed·
nesday and Thursday.
·The King' County Roads Depart·
ment said repairs are needed to
repair some steel beams bent in the ... ~~I-~-'" ....... ~"f'At~' Arr.irlent. Details
P.o. BOil 130, Kilnt, WA. 9803
(206) 872-3600
Circulation ..
Cia_led ode .
LocoInowo,
Spona .
Vmllo, Living .
. 172-881
. II7H62
.8~72
.872,6117
. .. 172.7
VALLEy {MIL y NEwS (lSSN 07 ...... 7337) (Ret
. EdIbOtI) 1$ publl$hId dally eJtCOPl 5alutday by II.
~, 600 S. WatangCon, Kant. WA. 98032
nghts ,--...d. CupyI'9'II 1MO. Donor Med&a (it<
Inc, Home dt;_vetrY by camer I' 55.75 emonth, $34.~
sill monChs. SfW. y.e'. MalI~' $75 • .,.. in I
CoutIty Of $81 • vear outSIdo KIng . Second C
"'-l_NOOdaIK..w,WIt.POSTMASTE ~add1
MEMORANDUM'~'
TO ~ ..
I
OF
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 z ooIL ;; '6 ~ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ~ ~.
'I'..,7c 1IJ",t?-
"0 SEP;I:.\I'
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR MEMORANDUM
December IS, 1986
TO:
FROM:
Larry Springer
Steve MunsonSI'Y'I
SUBJECT: Summary of Project Work for Week Decembet 8 -December 12, 1986
I. Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment (8.5 hours)
Rebecca Fox of the Tukwila Planning Department sent over to us a copy of the draft
resolution and procedure (as written by their prosecuting attorney) for finalizing the
boundary adjustment. I forwarded a copy to our City Attorney to review and
compare with our draft language. We also pulled together from our microflsche the
property legal descriptions for all parcels and owners involved. I asked Willis to put
mailing labels together from the list we have used in the past of involved property
owners. These are ready and I should have the letter finished by December 15th for:
review and concurrence by Tukwila so that we should be able to get the letter out by
Friday, December 19th (the last day to meet the notification deadline).
2. Container Corporation of America Annexation/Rezone (7.5 hours)
I wrote the Annexation Review Summary for the 10% Notice of Intent public
meeting on this and copies were distributed to Council and the proponent on
Thursday. The only real issue involves the rezone. Container Corporation does not
own all of the properties to be rezoned and cannot, therefore, seek zoning on the
entireannexation site (+45.08 acres). Container owns 42 acres and the remainder is
owned by King County -and two railroad companies. The County has Informed us
that they have no objections to the annexation/rezone and it is their policy not to
sign such petitions. The other two owners have not expressed any opposition either.
Since Container Corporation does not own these properties, we would likely have to
zone them by City action at the 75% Public Hearing. Bulding and Zoning advised me
that they could schedule a public hearing for the Container Corporation rezone on
January 6th. We could then hold the second. public hearing on this rezoning (with the
annexation) on February 9th. The other rezoning could also be heard on this date
but its second public hearing would have to occur after return from the Boundary
Review Board. This needs some further discussion.
230lG
ANNEXATION REVIEW SUMMARY
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
PUBLIC MEETING -DECEMBER 15, 1986
A. SUMMARY AND LOCATION
The applicant proposes the annexation of property totalling ± 45.08 acres
located along the west side of Monster Road S.W. in the 600-1000 block.
The signature on the petition constitutes 99.8% of the assessed valuation
within the proposed annexing area. This annexation and concurrent rezone
request, file R-021-86, to M-P (Manufacturing Park) is requested in order
that sanitary sewer service may be secured for the property.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION
The city limits in the vicinity of the proposed annexation were created
by the following ordinances:
Ordinance #1745 -4/14/59
Ordinance #1764 -5/27/59
Ordinance #1928 -12/22/61
A de annexation ordinance ((11928 of 12/26/61) of property adjacent along
the northwesterly border of the site is also involved. King County
zoning of the subject property is MH (Heavy Manufacturing). In the
County's Environmentally Sensitive Area overlay, the western half of the
subject site is designated as a Class III Seismic Hazard area. In
addition, there is identified a shallow water "Wetland" section in the
extreme northwesterly corner (running southwest-northeast).
The City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as
Manufacturing park/Multiple Option. The existing and projected use of
the site is consistent with this classification. Under Renton's proposed
Environmentally Sensitive Area regulation, two areas of sensitivity have
been identified. The area in the extreme northwesterly·. corner is
classified as "Very Severe" due to the existence of the wetland. In the
south-center and southeast portion along Monster Road S. W. is a "Very
Severe" designation due to slopes of 40% or greater.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
The City of Renton presently services the site with water and storm
sewer. Sanitary sewer service will be provided along with the Local
Improvement District for the property.
.. .
\
Annexation Review Summ~
Container Corporation of America
Page 2
Fire service is presently provided by King County Fire District {/4D
located at 148510 Petrovitsky Road. Upon annexation, the City of Renton
Fire station {Ill, located at 211 Mill Avenue South, would serve the
property. Police patrol services on Monster . Road S.W. pass adjacent to
the proposed annexation area.
D. ANALYSIS:
1. Departments evaluating the subject annexation have not found any
major problems related to their areas of responsibility as a result
of this proposal.
2. Reviewing departments have indicated that the proposed annexation
represents a logical extension of services provided by their
departments.
3. All departments indicated that service to this area could be
accommodated within existing facilities, staff, and budget resources.
4. All municipal departments support the proposed annexation.
5. At this public meeting, the City is required by RCW 35A .14 .120 to
answer the following questions:
a. Will the City accept the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an
indication of intent to annex? The Policy Development
Department recommends that the Council accept the annexation
petition.
b. Will the City require simultaneous
regulations for the -property? The
Department advises that the City require
of the property and recommends that M-P
the site.
adoption of zoning
Policy Development
simultaneous rezoning
zoning be imposed on
c. Will the City require the property to assume its proportional
share of the City's bonded indebtedness? The Policy
Development Department recommends that this requirement be
imposed. •
6. City Council Resolution No. 2429 establishes policies for the
evaluation of annexation applications. The proposed annexation is
generally consistent with those policies favoring extension of
existing public services, falls within the City's identified sphere
of influence, and is within its general service areas.
E. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the foregoing analysis, the Policy Development Department
supports the various City departments' recommendations for approval of
the requested annexation and rezone. It is, therefore, advised that
Council accept the 10% petition and set a time and date certain for the
75% Public Hearing.
I
I I
/
-i -..:.../
/---".,... I
. '.~'
. "'" .
\
\
\
'!..------111 ___ ,
-...... _--\., '\
\
\
E T R h \~ \
r \4 ----l------~\f----I
1 S P 0 S Al L\
I
. ..... . ' . .. :,'
':'
1
1
1
1 :
1 I
1 I
I I
1--::ILil,_ _ _ ::::::::
.r "
CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTI .. r:NT
CITY OF RENTON
DEC 121986
REQUEST TO PREPARE
75~ ANNEXATION PETITION POUCV
DIlVELOPMaIT "EP!",
The attached 75% ANNEXATION PETITION for the CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Annexation was authorized for circulation by the City Council iifter a public meeting
on .becerobec '(S, l"U3'2 • The SIGNATURES contained on the attached petition
REPRESENTS 75% OF THE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION within the annexation area .
.
NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: Please cs>mplete all appropriate sections of the application below
Please type or clearly print all of the necessary information. If you he ve any questions witt
regard to this application, please feel free to contact the Policy Development Department a
235-2552 or you mav discuss this matter in Derson in the Municipal Bui1di~, third floor.
75% ANNEXATION PETITION -Please include a $300 filing fee. In addition to the annexation
filing fee, the city is required to complete an environmental Impact evaluation of the proposed
annexation. The environmental review requires a filing fee of $60 plus $1 per $10,000 of
assessed value wi thin the annexation.
PROPONENT
Name CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Address7000 South 143rd Street
City ___ R_e_n_to_n~,_W_A ___ 98_0_5_5 ____________ __
Telephone, __ ..:(_2_06..:) __ 2_35_-~3_32_5 __________ _
CONTACT PERSON if other than
":-:"'IJe nt
. H. J. Ramirez, General Manager
or
J. S. Gardner, PurchaSing Manager
LOCATION __________________________________________________ __
Property Address same as above Lot Area Sq.Ft. __ _ AcreS'"45.08
.' See attached Exhibit flA fl. *Incl's Metro and K.C Pa~c'H~
PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION -The following reasons for annexation were included in'the'
10% NOTICE OF INTENT application. If you have additions or corrections, please note
them below or attach additional sheets.
"In order to participate with other Renton City property owners in forming an
L.I.D. petition for sanitary sewer service to our property. (See attached let-
ter from City of Renton, dated 12/02/85; Utilities Committee Report, dated
09/23/85; and Pg. 2 of Renton City Council Minutes, dated 09/23/85.) We are
currently zoned "MH" (heavy manufacturing) in King County; however, we wi 11
be submitting an application to the city of Renton for rezone to "MP" (manufac-
turing park)." •
- - - --- --- --- - - - - - -- - --. --- --- --- - - - - - -
ADDITIONAL REMARKS: 1) L.I.D. No. 332 as aSSigned by the City of Renton. 2)
Our request for Rezone was submitted on March 6, 1986, to the City of Renton.
3) Our Environmental Check List #ECF-019-86 (Appl. No. R-02186) was reviewed
and a Determi nat i on of Non-Si gnifi cance was pub 1 i shed by the City of Renton
on March 31, 1986, for both our appl ications for annexation and rezoning. 4)
We sold 3.71 acres of our property to the Municipality of Metro. Seattle (Metro
Sewage Treatment Plant-Renton) on May 5, 1986. 5) Revised Environmental Check
List attached.
AFFIDAVIT
he signature below authorizes the City of Renton to proceed with the annexation herein
esc/"! d! inclu ' preparatio~ ~f all annexation or environmental documents required to
ompl w any tutory proViSiOns.
<;:;g"'-~-d:~.L.;.a~~:::!:?c'L-----, being truly sworn, declare th"t' I' iim", ..... " ',r fi '''', .;' :--: .. ~.~~ '<,!,..,.~',
~ ... " ~
.:; r." .... tJ' ~ • ~, [2] Authorized Representative to act for the Property Owner ~~ ,; f' [1: Y: :::-
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers, si~tititure~~rif\(heJ.',
etition herein contained and the infDrmation herewith submitted are in all resiJe::ts'.ti".k
nd correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . . '.::,;~.,: ,,'
Owner of the P
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 11 th DAY OF....::.De:.;c:.;e;;;m:.:.b.::.er~ ___ .....;,
19 86,
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING
AT Renton, Washington " '
Name of Notary Public: ~,;{... Address: 7000· So 143 St. Renton, WA ' co'
r '.
CITY OF RENTON CITY· OF RENTON
DEC 121986 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REQUEST TO PREPARE
75%.ANNEXATION PETITION
The attached 75% ANNEXATION PETITION for the CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Annexation was authorized for circulation by the City Council after a public meeting
on '. • The SIGNATURES contained on the attached petition
REPRESENTS 75% OF THE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION within the annexation area.
NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: Please cs>mplete all appropriate sections of the application below
Please type or clearly print all of the necessary Information. If you have any questions witt
regard to this application, please feel free to contact the .Policy Development Depart ment at
235-2552, or vou may discuss this matter in person in the Municipal Building, third floor.
75% ANNEXATION PETITION -Please includc a $300 filing fee. In addition to the annexation
filing fee, the city is required to complete an environmental Impact evaluation of the proposed
annexation. The environmental review requires a filing fee of $60 plus $1 per $10,000 of
assessed value within the annexation.
PROPONENT
Name CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Address7000 South 143rd Street
City ___ R_e_n_to_n_, __ W_A __ 9_S_0_5_5_. ____________ _
Telephone __ ( 2_0_6.;..) _2_3_5_-3_3_2_5 ______ _
CONTACT PERSON if other than
;>roponent
H. J. Ramirez, General Manager
or
J. S. Gardner, Purchasing Manager
LOCATION __________________________________________________ ___
Property Address same as above Lot Area Sq.Ft. ___ Acre S'A 5 . 08
Lef';al Description: See attached Exhibit "A ". *Incl 's Metro and K.C, Parcels
PURPOSE' OF ANNEXATION -The following reasons for annexation were included in the'
1 0% NOTICE OF INTENT application. If you have additions or corrections, please note
them bclow or attach additional sheets.
"In order to participate with other Renton City property owners in forming an
l.I.D. petition for sanitary sewer service to our property. (See attached let-
ter from City of Renton, dated 12/02/85; Utilities Committee Report, dated
09/23/85; and Pg. 2 of Renton City Council Minutes, dated 09/23/85.) We are
currently zoned "MH" (heavy manufacturing) in King County; however, we will
be submitting an application to the city of Renton for rezone to "MP" (manufac-
turing park)." .
- - - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - - --- - -
ADDiTIONAL RH1ARKS: 1) L.l.D. No. 332 as assigned by the City of Renton. 2)
Our request for Rezone was submitted on March 6, 1986, to the City of Renton.
3) Our Environmental Check list #ECF-019-86 (Appl. No. R-02186) was reviewed
and a Determination of Non-Significance was .published by the City of Renton
on March 31, 1986, for both our applications for-annexation and rezoning. 4)
We sold 3.71 acres of our property to the Muriicip~lity of Metro. Seattle (Metro
Sewage Treatment Plant-Renton) on May 5, 1986. 5) Revised Environmental Check'
list attached.
AFFIDAVIT
he signature below authorizes the City of Renton to proceed with the annexation herein
escri d, inclu '[!g preparation of all annexation or environmental documents required to
ompl w' any tutory provisions.
'....l...f.. +-,-==' =::;;::::;-........ "'t?-y-'-"1A"'.""~'-.::;-.;..'_~",.~-----------'. being truly sworn, declare ..t.~~t, I am \ 0 Owner of the pope' y Involved m Authorized Representative to act for the Property Owner
.' , .'
~ ~ ,;. . ",,' -.. .. ' .. ' -::. ~ ': ...... . : ..
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers, signlltures o!' .~~e:
;lctition herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all ~sp(:;:!s tr-JC
. nd correct to the best of my knowledge and belie!. ". : .. :.: " .. ' ..........
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 11th DAY OF-=..:De:..:c~em;;;;l:..:)e~r ______ ,
19 86 '
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR' THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING
AT . Renton, Washington' ., . ,
Nameo! Notary Public: 6 ... ,~Y':.:.~~._' Address:7UOO So 143 St. Renton. WA
I ,
• .'
,.':,1 l' ";',' \
.'
,
..
;.(.11". ') II ",f"),. "J
'f'l: ;c~
: ~ I. .
ANNEXATION APPLICATION
PAGE 2
f''''~ ""tIJ~'1n 'j. ; I ! <to
'iTAFF lJSE ONLY -Pl~8se do not write in thp ~nR"" hPl
.. .. . By: Uni tisls}
Date Received , ' .. , ::" ,,'.
Filing Fee Received , , ..
To Public Works tor Legal and Map , , . Returned , ,
.
Letter ot Intent Prepared , , Forwarded to Proponent_, ,
Completed Letter ot Intent Received , , Number of Signatures
Total Annexation A V: I 098_> Percent Signatures % • .. .
Environmental Review
Environmental Checklist Completed I , ' ..
ERC Action , , _Negative Declaration ,
__ Negative Declarations With Conditions
: Declaration of Signi{icance -. • ERC Appeal Period Ends / / ,
Oepart mental Routing / / Date Due / /
Building and Zoning ~inance Fire Library
Engineering ; Police Parks Utilities ,
i
Other •
City Council Agenda Bill for. I / Public Meeting Se.t / /
Applicant Notified , /
Annexation Review Summary and Maps to City Council / / .
City Council Action: .
; .
Approved circulation ot 75% petition.
Revised Annexation Boundary and approved circul,~tion ot 75% petition •
: I. 'v •
Revised annexation and required new 10% petitipt'i.;
. ' ,I ."
Denied request.
.,
.....
•
, ••••.• t"
'.. • .. , 0' •••••
I:
1 I .
,'~. ..'.
"
;,~ :
'\ '. ' ... . ,
.
I
. .
.
,
" P .'. ANNEXATION APPLICATION
PAGE 2
ISTAFF USE ONLY -Please do not write in thp ~nA"p
By: (Initials)
Date Received / /
Filing Fee Received / / "
To Public Works for Legal and Map '/ I , Returned, / I
,
Letter of Intent Prepared / I Forwarded to, Proponent-, /
Completed Letter of Intent Received I I Number of Signatures
Total Annexation AV: 098_> Percent Signatures . % .
Environmental Review ','
Environmental Checklist Completed I I '.'
ERC Action I / _Negative Declaration ,
, Negative Declarations With Conditions
, ,_Declaration of Sig~t(icance ,
ERC Appeal Period Ends / / I
Depart mental Routing / / Date Due / /
Building and Zoning Finance Fire Library
Engineering Police Parks Utilities
Other
City Council Agenda Bill for L I Public Meeting Set I J
Applicant Notified / I
Annexation Review Summary and Maps to City Council / /
City Council Action:
.
Approved circulation of 75% petition.
Revised Annexation Boundary and approved circulation ,of 75% petition.
Revised annexation and required new 10% petition.
Denied request.
'\ .
•
, ,
'1
i
!
":'
L
"
j
I
.....
,
!:~,
iJ_' ~ i E.~
;~ ~.--... ,
;~r'~ "i;
·~r p:
'~
jt
\' '-, .
, .
.
,
I
.I
-'
City of Renton
ECF:
lU:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS~ITY OF RENTON
'purpose of Checklist:
DEC 12 1986
POUCY
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 113,2 I C RCw:,ve~s II)m
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
. decisions. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the Quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the Questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each 'Question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the Questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a Question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the Questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
'Some Questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline: and
landmark designations.' Answer these Questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you .
. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of-Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though Questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENT AL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
. For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
. the references In the checklist to the words "project." "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A.
I,
2.
3.
BACKGROUND . ,
. ' ~
Name of proposed project, if applicable:
ANNEXATION to City of Renton, WA (King County):
Name of applicant:
".
•
45.08 acres (CCA, Metro; King
County Parcels)
Container Corporation of America '
Address and phone number of applicant and contact· person:
H. J. Ramirez, Gener~l Manager (206) 235-3325
7000 South 143rd Street, Renton, WA 98055
Date checklist prepared: . December 11,. 1986 . ' " .. " ~ " -....
Agency requesting checklist:, City of:Rento,~" WA
Proposed timing or schedull:l (including pha~i~g:lf~pplicable):
. • '_ .. , '", ~,,' ,'_i.': "f:: -·,;\~-t,:r>!· ':''''':' .
Immediate -to'be phasea withL.LD:#332;:«Ociksdale Ave. S.W. wlth sanitary
sewer extensi.6no'to ~,our property: li:,nel:a:~.~~ iin, conjunct i on with our App 1 i cat i on
to Rezone from K.C; "MH'" t·o ,City .of' Rent.on ,"M~P."
. ' .. .~ .
,. "' .' t.
7. Do you have any p.ans for future additions. expansior ,r further activity related
to or corinected with this proposal'? if yes. explain.
None other than L.r.D. #332 (City of Renton)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. or will
be prepared. directly related to this proposal.
None known
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain.
None, other than our Application for Rezone from King County "MH" to City
of Renton "M-;R".
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
None known
II. Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain. aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
No change in operational use.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and
section. township. and range if known. If a proposal would occur Oller a range of
area. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal. description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
B.
I.
Address: 7000 South 143rd Street, Renton, WA (King County) 98055
ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS , .
. .
EARTH
. r:
a. General description of, the site (circle one); flat, rolling, cE!1l0 steep
slopes, mountainous, other _______ ,
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% -'If) Z
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel. peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Clay, 'sand and gravel
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
None known
- 2 -
i f, .".
! l , .. ,.;
i
I
" .
'.
'.
, "
;"
.. ... : ,,~'. : -
,e. ' ,;" Desc ..... e the purpose. type. and approx .e quantities of any filling or
" grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. . ', .. " .. -> ':.~'. ,
" 'N/A
"
f.' ' Could erosIon occur as a result of clearing. construction, or use? If so,
genera!ly describe.. ",' '
.N;A
,",.
g. ." , About what percent' of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)?
N/A "
h. ", ,Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the
, earth. if any:
N/A
, ,
2. AIR
"
'. l<:' :;
"',
, "
," ".
.,. '
.,.J
, -,'
\~ " '-'
'+ .;., :'/' "i' >;" ," .
. " .
a.
b.
c.
What types of, emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e .•
dust. automobile. ,odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give
" !lPproximate quantities if known.
N/A '
Are there any off-site sources of emission? No
Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air.
if any:
N/A.
WATER
a.
3)
Surface:
'. i,
Will the project' require' any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
;-the desc,:ibed waters? If yes; please describe and attach available plans.
, '
, .'.' '
'~-, " v;' , .. ' N/A,', , .: . '"
, ": ~, "
, ,
. '.,
'",' '. ,-'
Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or '
removed from surface water or wetlands and Indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. ,Indicate the source of fill material.
'N/A
, -.~
, .. ~,,' ,'"'-''' , , .,!"
.
t' ,'.
, I ... ·,
. :.
'," '
" ,,' '-, ' "'",( .
.~ ~. .. ". ';'" .-:, ""-.;
, ,. .. ,
, '
""
'" .,: . ,.'
.. '
.: .
. ",
. .
, .,'
. . ,
, " ~ ,,~ .,
,
. ,," ..
',""
'.,
' ..
" "
4)
.' ."
.. WllI thepropo;~1 ,equlrelurface water' "",-,,drawals or diversions? . Clve
'" general descrlrtJon, purpose, and approximately quantities If known.
, ~": ". ~~:·'1\";"" "-' .' " ",",' :~.' .".. ." • M·'· • • .
'. ,No· . '.'
,t'· s," "1
4
,, .~~:!:{~': ,.:".:: "
5) . " ,. Does tt.. proposal lie within a lDO-year floodplain?
the site ';;Ian. .
If so, note location on
" .. ,'
. Yes (Renton -Kent· V'alley Flood)
',. I . _., '. '0/" ~ .. .' :,.: ,:' ,,~.'; ~~>' '.:-;'
. 6) .... Does the propOSed Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so; describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
, .
I)
2)
.. ,'. .' ,
c.
I)
, .
'discharge. , ,,' ",
,:,", ''ii'
, ~, ... '
,"'1,',>
, :'.
Crou~ "
;:~
" "
.,". ,
. ,-
. ., .. ,
· Will ground water be withdrawn, 'or will water be discharged to ground
water? Cive general description, . purpose, and appaoxlmately quantities if '
known.
No
. ) ,"
. ', ~ -.. ' ..
',' .:
" , .
"", .. ',.' .
",,',
Descn:ae waste, material that wl11 be discharged Into the ground from
: septic ~nks or other sources, If any (for' ex'ample: Domestic sewage:
.' Industroil, containing the foHowlng chemicals. • .: agricultural: etc.) .
· Describe the general 'size: of the system, the number of such systems,' the
. number of houses 'to be'served (If applicable). or the number of animals or
.. humans the system(s) are expected to serve. .
· '. . ... ... ... ~ .;; ; ..
'"". -.'< ' •. , . None: ' .;
' ..
.. '
:, Water R~noff (Including storm water):
, . ' .. ' ,,', .
)
. . ,'
'. Describe the souree of runoff (Including storm water) and method of
\ : col1ection and disposal.' If any (Include quar;.tltles. If known). Where wlll
',this water flow? Will this water f1~w: Inlo other waters? If so, describe. ,
I' .". ,; ,..... , '\;}';"" . I' J-,." ~
,'. Storm collection sewers around pedmeter Of plant buildings.
':,'discharging into drain field.,', . • , ,
I < .: '..,.
• I ,0
: ..... "
' . . '
.. ~
'",. .; < -
, .
, ' .
. ': ,'~
, ..
, .(
I "
~.' '-; .
. ,;:,~ .-' ... :~, .. :;{~~~ ~;~'; ',: " : ':'. ~ . '. ,.'. '. . " '. 'd;;,:,,:, Propused measw:e,B"~O, ~duce or control, -fface, ground, and runoff, )Nater
. .Impacts, Ifany(;, ' ,.:,:;:";, ,,' " " , '
,:;" "" ,~;ti/A ' :;.':" " .! ".,:.
, '
" < : •
o .... • "'~
. i ~:
1; '" Co:, ::,,'; .. ,
"
...... ~~"J \
c.~, ". ",""
• _I,
,','
,"r . '"
',,'
,I
, ·1 .
:)
'i
,I
, ,
,
'"j
:
.j , ,
" I
,-·';1
'1 ,.,~
?
'; 1
~, :
v:
Check or circle types of ,vegetation found on the site:
@ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
o ' evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine; other
@ Shrubs "" " , "
@ grass.",
I,' 0 {crop or grain, :
@ Wet soli plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
" D' water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoU, other
", D , " other types of vegetation
':'.' ' '.
" .1
b. ',What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
c.
, ,
None
List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
: None "
, , ::-"" .. "", ' ... " .",
.,' "
l'
"
I
.: . .<,1 ,', " ' .. ";. ' '. "
, Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
.. or enhance vegetation on the site; If any:
,
" ,
:;1: I,
1
"
" ... ,-
5. ' : Animals':" . '."
.' a. Cirell; any'birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
, " . or, are known to be on or near the site: , .' ~ .' '.
c,1 ,;" "" • ,;: ,;,' Birds:' Hawk;heron'~ eagl~, SO~gbirds: other None Observed
-' ,
"'i' ' ", Mammals: deer, bear, elk, ,beaver, other None Observed
J 1 ", I ". Fish:' bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,. other None Observed
" ·1 '. , , .' 'v I i
.),\ ";.' . J. ...: '.' to .
';;1 " 'b.:' List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
'{ ;':.: ~.",:~: .. } l' "{" . -. -' •
>:;;.:. -"( ~."" .~~>. ~:~~~'~' . -,., 'None: .'
r ;' ,~' ." ....
If so, explain.
I ~, • >,"-' , ' ~. . .
" "
;.j • , , '
"'i
,
" . . '. ' . . '. <,f_ "
" .';'
,'f' , "1>~:~l~f:; ',. :,,:':' .\ -5":'
" , ....
""f.
, .. '.:~..:.. '., ,.,'
',,'. , .t.,.·,
. ,'. ;'.
,.t., ~' , . ,;~~'J.' .'.' "", '" \ .
/S, -, '
"
",' :\
, ~. ..
".'
';'i:> " ',' .• ,' '.::~; " i"j ,< "
'6.,. Energy ern! N~turafResources'·.
", ~ .' .. ' . '~ .:' , ..' j'.-
• :":',";"'<>', a. " "What kInds of energy (electrIc, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
-', used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether It
, .', .
/'
, : .
~., ~ .
. i,
will be used for heating. manufacturIng. etc.
, .' " , '-, ",,' "',
, '"
El ectri c' -Pl ant/Offi ce Power requi rements .
Natural Gas -Heating Boiler
, .' ~ , .. ( ',' 'l
'.' ,
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
. properties? If so, generally describe. . .' ", ' .
~., .. " ,-i' .. ' '~
No ': ~ '.
'! '
" ,
"" , .' '
',' .
. ' i ' . c,:; What kinds of energy conservation features are InCluded In tlie plans of this
" 'proposal?' List 'other . proposed measures to reduce Dr control energy
Imp,acts. If any: ,.
.p', ,
None; .
• ! .'
"7. ".' . Environmental Health
..' , ",
.. '.. a.' . :': Are 'the~ '8n~ 'eiwlronmental health hazards. including exposure t~ toxic
:".,'.,:''-:<, (:l./:·chemlcals,risk offire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
" ". " '('; . ":', occur 8S 8 result of thIs proposal? If so, describe. . . " . , . . .. '
, ,'/ I, .,' ,," "r
·'No. "
' .. ;,.
+<, ",
, ",.." -, , • , ,'.',' ": ' ~ oj ,:,' ,
. '. Describe special emergency services ttiat might be required.
'. ,.". "
: t. \ , '
., ".::,: 1)
:·;t:;~·.' .
,',.' ..... , ,,' ' .. Police and Fire Protection
,,' .. ::.:,::~;Yf,.~.,1' " ,;'>,'.'" '.~" ' .• ,'\'0.; ". • "., '." ':It, , :~." '.. 'I:~.· '. '. , .
environmental health haZards. If
... 'i l)
',' ';
~, .. .
,\-1-"
"<:":
" .. '" ",
. What types of nois~ exIst In the area which may' affect your project (for
.:; exalTlple: traffic, equlpment~ operation. other)?
None
, .'
. ~, l.,' :. ,,"., ,,'
~ "\, ,
B.
.. ',
i,""
,,,~
'" Proposed measures to reduce or control noIse Impacts. If any:
. ,~'.".~.J. • ': ' ",.' ~ .
N/A "
, "
" ' Land and Shoreline Use ' ; , :',
.) ): " .
" a. .': What Is the curren~ use of the site and adja~ent properties?
",
, Manufacture of Paperboard Folding Cartons and Open Lands, Adjacent
. to Manufacturing'Plant and Office building.
, ,
'b. ',Has the site been, used for agriculture? If so, describe.
;, '
, .;,' .~. ,Yes, Harvesting of Hay (last used in 1984). ., , .,' >::'-' J, ' ,.' .
" ,
C." Describe any structures on the site. '
.," ",. ;," ,
::" Manufactu~ing plant and office building, 144,800 sq. ft. total . ' , ' >~ .
. ~.
, d. 'Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
" ~',
" .\ , , No
, .
).
e. ~'" What Is ,t/:le current zoning cla~sification of the site?
" ". ,;:.' .' ", ". • '. 'I ' "'''.''. ,,'. ,,; 0",,: ,;"", ':';,{uM_H'" Heavy Manu.facturi ng by Ki ng County.
," ' "': f. . 'j;What is the current' comprehensive plan designation of the site?
)
~ • t-.
': '
"
","
> -, ,,!. :.
, "
k.
",
., ....
. ,.~
"
"
,Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? . . . . ~~
N/A
, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement Impacts, if any:
. :~" . . ,
, '
" " N/A , ' , ,
L", •
" , I • ,,' \ ~, , ': ,': ' :,N,one ','. ;': '
Appro)(lmately : how many"unlts; I' any. would be elimInated? Indicate
whether hJgh. mIddle, or low-Income housing.
" ,-b.
,'-, ' , " • "1',,: . " . '~ i -~ , , ,,' ' '
N/A' ,~, \,', '
';' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing Impacts, If any: ,
" , ):'\';';." i.," . 't" ,
". '
;,
-~, '
~/A
", . '. ' ..
, " '10," Aesthetics ....
a.
: b.
,,: .' , ,
; ~ ,
,., .
What Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not Including
antennas: what Is the principal e)(terior building material(s) proposed.
<,:\', .. '.. ,",' ' .;~ , , . . •
;) '," .
", : '
, What views In the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
" , ~ "
'None' ; ,,'
. '". ~,' ." -:"'. ""
" ,:\"..";-,, '~~ -·,,;:"l, : " ,'}:
.', '
c. , Proposed measure's to reduce or control aesthetic Impacts, if any:
, .', .--:. ",.',. . , ;r-. .~'
""
.'. ,:~~"
" ;
',:: 11 , " .
',~ .
;,".
.' ' .\"</ •
, ,',
, ,
, "
LIght and Glare
, '. . ,:,.,-.
, " .... "
a. '" . What type of llght or' glare will the proposal produce?
,.:,' ";:: would it mainly occur? ,c., '
.: ~ • ~ • ': •• >. ," " '
i ~, . , '.. 'None'
i. ,,'
" '. ,: --,",' ,7,,' '-. ,"
" ~ . ,,: .' ' ....... . \ .'.: .... '.~ .. _'
:' '. .' ..
" : •••• ' " . • ,f;,"
". . ~. <'~ .~.:-.... .'
, '
" :, : •• ''II'
What time of day
)
,,'" . ,;: .~. , ;:Could light or glare from' the
. , f1nl~~ed pJ;CiJect be a safety hazard or
i~':;,,'} '\",./ " ~\:';:1:t{.~~,~erfere ~lthvlews? ~ .' . . .:. '
,'''', , ' .,.:':-:,c; " ' ,No ,', ,.'
~'; '. ~ . .: .....
,"
, '
,',:,' -.,;" > ~
,,"', '
-'.-
',. "
'"
None' '"
. ,7;
..~ ',. ..... .,
. r _.' ".', '
... -;"',' -...
" .' ,-.... "
• I,·i ." .",. ,0 ., .'.,:t.:,."-:":, ",' : •••
',. :~sed'measures to 'reduce ~~controlllght and glare Impacts, I' any: ".' ", d .' .
. '':I :,<. < •
N/A , "
."
. < .. '" "~ " :(
. -,": ,-,~ .
" , ' ~'" ~ , .. ' '/'~ :-. . ~:
" , :.1, ,"
·.i ," , ,. " .
12. Recreation
a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are in the
Immediate vicinity?
None
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so.
describe.
Not applicable
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not appl icable_
l~. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applicable
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
South 143rd Street and Monster Road
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
, .
No -approx i mate 1 y 1 mil e,l •
" c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Not applicable·
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
,None requi re'd because of Annexat i on or Rezone. However, City of
Renton L.r.D. No, 332 will provide improved roads and extension of
sanitary sewer line to our property line.
-9-
, "
..
, ,
e . Will the project use (or occur In the Immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? "If known, Indicate when peak volumes would occur.
115 employees - 3 shifts (7AM-3:30 PM)(3:30PM-11:30PM)(11:30PM-7AM)
38 employees -8AM'-4:45 PM. Trucking approx. 10 per day
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation Impacts, If any:
None
15.' Public Services'
a. Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools. other)?
If so. generally describe.
Fire and Police only
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services.
if any.
Not applicable
16. Utlllties
a. Ci Ie utilities current! available at the site: <6iectricitV~ural ga~
water refuse servlc telephone, anitary sewer,&"eptic sysEem~ nero
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
, providing the service. and 'the general construction activities on the site or
In the Immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Sanitary sewer to replace septic system (RE: Renton L.r.D. #332)
C. SIGNA JURE
I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might Issue In reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or wUlful lack of full disclosure on
my part. ' •. . . ,
Proponent:
Name Printed: H. J. Rami rez
..
.... . ..
•
-10-
, , (,,-': , ~-.'!\ :" .... \ ;'.: /', .. '.:1". _, . . -,
. .
' ... ' ,~,' .: D.~· " SUPPLEML •• AL:SHEET FOR NONPROJECT A ... ,IONS '.: "<, '-';~::~'::~~'~'.'~~~':"., : ,'. ~ '~~"~ ";, ."" .... '. ·v:,,~ " .,' . ",: .
. ' ... (This sheet should only be .used for actions Involving decisions oh pollcles. plans and
'-~.
" • i programs:· 00 not use this sheet for project actions.) .
. " " .. :. '~'. ,·t;':':~."":'\.'~"', ;., .'::: .... ~ ',:'> " ... '" :', .
'Because these· 'questlons are" very general. It may be helpful to read them In
conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. . .,
, ~' .... -t. " • ',' '. "~'. '.. ". ',',;-,,' ;' ': • ""(" . -' : •
, . When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types
· of activities likely to"result from the proposal, would affect the Item at a greater
Intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
. . . ' ',' briefly and In general terms •. ; .' .
-. '::. 'j: .. ;' .... , .', ' .. ,' " ., .
1 •.
. :;
· How would the proposal be llkely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
· . production, storage, ',orrelease of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of
nolse?~'. ':\J"
.~ !.,
'.' Not.at all
',"
,.
,
.'.
'. f"
· Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
, 'N/A .
"
2." '. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
, . '"
• • " > ~~
" . . ' .
'. No impact
,'. " .. ' "
· Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
, ': '. ~ • -r •
," ....
, d; . ,',
, '~'. .~
. ~~:;;:
, ~/A' . ' ~ .:"
.' .:
, '.
" .
,.' ",,"
".
.. 3. . . .. How would the proposal be Ukely to deplete energy or natural resources? · ' ' ... , '."."
.,., • r , , , . . ,,:" <, "~._:",
··'r·" ", .' ,\ , Not at alV
"
".' ;
:
.'. . ,
" "
Proposed measures to protect or con~erve energy and natural resources are:'
'~, . . .
'I.~ , t,'1:::' :
", "I ','"e", • " ,,", '\'," .. '1 .. r4t:(~{.:;., )::;', '
, .... ~:,' ·c· ,::,,:;:. 'N/A .
',::>" ", ., .. ' .
',-".', , .. : .. '~ r , ,. '~ ~\",,:
4.':·;·:·>"How would. the proposal be likely. to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas ":~"":' ',; '; or, areas designated (or ellgible or. under study) for governmental protection; such
:,,' .'.,." '''':' as parl<s,wlldemess,' wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species
...... ' ,'." habitat, historic or cultural sites~ wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? .
, .... : -( ", j , " : .' '.. I • ,: ""\ '
.. } :' .,.,., , .
··>c " ...... ; .. :".,:".: ; Not' at all·:.:·;·.~·
.J.-'::'.; -,:.,>~,'<"':' . '.. '~ .. ,;.;I'(}:;,
'.;; . '. .' "~rop~sed ~~asures to protect S~~h resources or to avoid or reduce Impacts are:
J., .. 'i'
. , .. ,
",-'.' .. '
' ..
"'-.. . ~ ...
. :"-"
...
, ,,'.,1,_, I" '.' " \.,. .f
.,
;/" ! ~~~.: -: .',~.,.'
" . ' ..
. . '-, "'~,' -:.
,-(.' .. ", . ., . . .. '-, ' . •..
: .
....
, ,>.;, .. ' .' ~}', .';, '."
. ,
',," -'" , .
" . ; .•• .#
.; ,
" .. '\ ,.J .. ,.-.
,. .
• , !" . ~, ./(' " .. ,,'
: "
# " _',~ I; .,.','
',' ,
'.
,', ...•. !
, .
'. .. '
:; -'
• •
.', . '.
, ,
s.
! ,
How would' the proposal be' likely to affect land and shoreline use, Including
whether It would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses Incompatible with
existing plans? ' , "
, "
Not applicable
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Not applicable
6. ,How would the proposal be likely to Increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
" '" - t t' ' l'nstead of King County Sheriff Dept. Renton Police ~nd, F1r~ pro,ec lon,
and Spring Gl'en FireiDept. '
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: ,
Not applicable
7. Identify, If possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local, state', or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
• t.
None known
SIGNATURE
. I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above Information Is
true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-sIgnificance that It might Issue In reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.:'" ,
Proponent:
Name Printed: H. J.' Rami rez
••
, .. ,J
•
, I:
I
. , .
".', ,
.'
',.~ " '
, '
.'-.
":...,,,'-.,,'
:-12",",'~, " .. ,' ....
\
t,
I,
~,
!
::>c n n
" -, < n
Q.
a'
'<
S
~
13
\.
>-3
0
>-3
f:
~ 0
8
", '
SI6l 8 t 03n
,un IU",u f E-J"-
Co
~
~ ~
........
. ~
8
0
0
n
1:':1
H
t;j
0
~
~ IL-I~
~
~ ::.:
H z
~ o
Z
~~
~
ID
IX)
o
U1
U1
r.;
k ~ r;'
>" r
~
9.)
\
}>
....
ID
~
(1 -""" 2 ~ l> ~ 2
(") 0 IT!
C
"%j
IT! :tI "'0
l> tr.l :::0
004 2 s:~ ~O -12
z
oC
'"::,' :"';:;;?}/::~' .
. ";, .. f:;·:,A ... ;.
~ , " '''." . ~ ,-.,.', "·:.':·.:t __ ~_~ :
I .
Folding Carton Division
December 5, 1986
Steve Munson
7000 S. 143rd Street
P.O. Box 479
Renton, Washington 98057
City of Renton Annexation Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 206 235·3300
(X, I Ut-Rt:NTON
DEC R 1986
POLICY
1l""~LOPMEm "'~PT
RE: Short Subdivision (Short Plat) request by City of Renton
This is to confirm our telcon on December 4, 1986, pertaining to your request
that we are required to submit a short pl at to accompany our request for
annexation. I-understand that your request was initiated when you discovered
that CCA had sold 3.71 acres of our property to the Municipality of
Metropolitan Seattle (Metro Sewage Treatment Plant-Renton) for part of their
new effluent transfer pipeline that extends across our property.
We had furnished Mr. Roger Blaylock, City of Renton, this information with
our request for rezoning on March 6, 1986. We had understood that this would
be coordinated with your office. The final sale of our property to Metro was
accomp 1 i shed on May 5, 1.986. I have attached some, copi es of documents ttiat
outline the Metro purchase and easement rights.
,'A 1 so attached is a copy of a King County Development Assi stance Bull et in #25.
According to information on page 2 of this bulletin, we are not required to
short sub-divide because we sold the land "to a government agency or a public
\ ut i 1 i ty company".
Please call me if you have any further questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
J. S. Gardner
Purchasing Manager
els
attachments
cc: H. J. Ramirez -'Renton
'. "
-,
:, .
"
'i! '
11-1: ..,
" .
.'
METRO
. REVISED
FORMAL OFFER LETTER
. TO: Mr. James P. Charpie DATE: September 6 J 98!j
, (
Manager, Real Estnte
Container Corporation
. of Amer lea
Carol Stream. IL 60188
Renton Effluent PROJECT: Trans fCr System
EASEMENT iGIO-ZIGIO-2A
Reference: RENTON EFFLUENT TRIINSFER SYSTEM (ETS)
~letro is in the process of obtainin9 Sewer pipeline easements
for the 96-inch Renton ETS pipeline and will require an ease-
mentiS) across property in which you have an interest (see
attached legal description).
The property rights to be acquired by Metro are described on
the easement form tha~ will be presented to you by Metro's
agent.
In accordance with Met,r0 policies, yo~r property has been
",' appraised and it has been determined that the ,Just Compensat ion
value for the required easement(s) is not less than the approved
fair market appraisal value of the proper"y (see, below).
,., .
Permanent Easement, Approx. Sq. Feet J? 901l + $ 22 I ~ 2
Damages Approx. Sq. F<.!et 11 211l + $ 12 581 Purchase' Approx. Sq. Fe3t I G I 75 9 + $ 32 3 !JIB
.TOTAL' $363,24l
Rounded 5361 lOO ,
Temporary Construction
," Easement Approx. Sq. Feet l78,JOO + $4,Q~~ Qer
The above easement and purchase areas have been surveyed.
The.Temporary Easement will be paid at the end of construction
based on tne time actually used.
LUQnth
'Therefore; please accept this letter as Metro's formal offer
to acquire the easement or property 1n the amount of Three
Hundred ,Sixty, Three Thousand and Two Hundred Dollars ($363,200).
'If you decide to have the offer evaluated, Metro will reimburse
you up to the amount of $200.00 for expert evaluation costs
aSSOCiated with ··this transaction, provide!j tnat you submit
the appropriate bills or paid receipts.
Owner(s) I
. -COII'MIIIER GOilPOilJl'PlSU SF
AMERICA
By ./)dt.~ •.
.. Sen~or Vice President
Date: September J J J 9 85
"yy/05/U)
Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle
'X£~kz~ . Hiqh t-of-Way 6. Yro~Suf>erv isor
SUSAN M. SOLBERG
/~~
IIqent for ~lojtro
MilT HARRIS
.. . . ... ( ''"<," '. '. "1"\ .... q .•
I" .' t'" /, , .. ,.j .... , . 'I "" ;~.
-.
,
,'l
~/
(
i ... ";" . l '. RIGHT-OF-ENTRY AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this 11th day of September. 1985. by
and·between CONTAINER CORPORATION'OF AMERICA (Owner herein) and
the MUNICIPALITY,,0F METROPOLITAN SEATTLE (Metro herein).
i ,"'. " ..
This "Right 'Of' Ent'ry , 1s given Metro to by Owner for the
purpose of designing." installing and constructing a sewer
···,interceptor. surge pipeline and tank. with all connections •
. manholes;and=appurtenances,thereto. together with the right of
ingress to and egress from. over. across. along. in. upon and
. under the property ,described in the attached Exhibit A and
Exhibit B before' the formal easement and purchase have been
granted to Metro.' '
The Owner and Metro. by granting and accepting this Right
of Entry respectively. mutually covenant and agree as follows:
1. ·Metro shall pay to the Owner the sum of Two Thousand
Dollars ($2.000.00) fo~ this nonrevocable Right of
,Entry for the purposes set forth above .
2.
3 •.
4."
" ,,-
... ~ .: t,
. ", • >;"
Owner and Metro agree to' continue in good faith to
negotiate the terms ofa formal easement and a
purchase agreement substantially in the form of
Exhibit A and Exhibit B. respectively. attached hereto
for said facilities. In addition. Metro will make
reasonable efforts to minimize disruption and
inconvenience to said property and uses made thereof . . "
This Right of E~try will become null and' void at such
time as a.formal easement and a purchase agreement
providin~ for.the terms substantially in the form of
Exhibit A and Exhibit B. respectively. have been'
executed'~ndapproved by Owner and Metro.
By executing this Right of Entry Agreement. the Owner
does not waive any legal remedies available to him for
just· compensation. In the event a formal easement or
purchase agreement cannot be negotiated as
contemplated above. then this Agreement shall be
deemed to constitute a stipulation of the Owner to
public use and to immediate use and possession so as
to qualify the Owner for reasonable attorney and
expert witness fees pursuant to RCW 8.25.070.
5. Metro shall be liable for compensation to Owner for
th~·use of the construction easement area only. at the
rate of $4.086 per month. for't6e period of actual use
by Metro. The term "actual use" as used herein shall
be construed to include only the period 'from
September 16~ 1985. until completion of construction
of said sewer line including reconstruction and
restoration pursuant to paragraph 7 be~ow.
. .
"':c~~;:., --, ~---;;::=--
_'i' .Y ~,.: . j
,>:,,' I :' RIGHT-OF-ENTRY AGREEME~;
• / Page Two
" ',.~ . "
, "
I , " , ,~,'
I :, .
f.. . ,... , . . .... :
! ,6. Metro shall protect and save harmless, Owner from and
" ".. ':against any 'and, all claims, damage to or loss or
,',,' . ,destruction' of' 'property wha tsoever suffered by Owner,
"';: its;successo~s,,'assigns, tenants, licensees and
_;~.'i'l,,~invitees, caused by the installation, construction, or
,; ',,':'operation of:' said' facilities, but Metro shall not be "-'-' , ;.: ,~,,~,.:,so;obligated for c,laims, damage, loss or destruction
" ,;": caused' by the sole negligence of the Owner, its
. : : ~ ' .. successors.' assigns,' tenants, licensees and invi tees •
• " • ,l •• ,).,,< ~'."<'~ ~ .... :,t.,,:. ".
"1,' ' , •• ' "\ ,,' ,'01,;.-", '
, ~ 7.: Metro' shall,"upon completion of installation and
, ' ' " .", construction of any facilities desci:ibed herein,
. remove all debris and restore the surface of the
-',:' property as nearly as practicable to the condition in
;., which'it existed at the date 'of this Agreement subject
" ,to the ,terms of, the formal permanent easement. ,
'r' " \', ' l' ~ ", . ., .
8. This Right of Entry is subject to such leases,
licenses and permits heretofore granted by Owner or
predecessors in interest 'affecting said property as
.. may be currently valid at law.
~ '"
, "
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<-~ \ ~
, "
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE . ' ,
By::, ' '
,,;'1' Susan'M. Solberg -,
Supervisor. Righ,t-of-way, & Property
. :'
, " o , "
. . . . . , ",
o •
, "
. ;.'
. . } . ", I
t:~/
" 'II , '
r
• <, .
, ,
I
"',
....
" ,
i
I
J'
"
, . '
".' j\' ~~!
" .'. ,
;' ,
.,1-," . .." .
;1,.""" . , ,: .
, ',.,
Exhibit A
, '" .. ~ .. . " .J t· .'
'. lo "''/
. ..... ::""., ".~' "
",UTILITY EASEMENT
, " .~ ..
'. ~'.;. ,.
. . . . '. ~ ",', '
• '. "1'~.' :.I'q
CONTAiNER'CORPORATION OF AMERICA. a Delaware Corporation. its
successors~and assigns' (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor").
for and, in: consideration' of" the' sum of Thirty Nine Thousand
Seven Hundred Dollars '($39.700.00) and other valuable
considerations, the, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged •
does herebylconvey and 'grant to the MUNICIPALITY OF
METROPOLITAN SEATTLE;"its successors and assigns (hereinafter
referred to as: "MUNICIPALITY"). a' permanent easement over.
across~ along, in,'upon'and under the following described
property: :' " "
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 24. Township 23
North. Range 4 East. 'W.M., lying Easterly of the Burlington
'Northern and 'the Chicago. Milw~ukee. Saint Paul and Pacific
Railroad Rights of Way. included within the limits of a
strip of land 20 feet in width, the centerline of which is
described as follows:" '
i ,'.' '. (', .. , .
Beginning at the'Northwest corner of said Section 24:
thence 'South '070'29' 26" East along the North line
thereof 30.04 feet: thence South 23 0 30' 00" Ea~t 761.65
" feet to apoint'on a curve from which the radial center
bears North 66 0 30' 00" East 572.96 feet: thence
'Southerly along the arc'of said curve concave to the East
'104.31 feet: thence South 33 0 55' 52" East 905.96 feet to
a'point on a curve'from'which the radial center bears North
56 0 04' 00" East 572.96 feet: thence Southeasterly along
,the arc of said curve concave to the East 319.69 feet:
thence Sotith65 0 54' 00" East 100 feet more or less to an
, intersection with the Westerly margin of Monster Road and
the terminus of 'said 'centerline description, containing
,32.900 square feet, more or less. "
• I .'. ~ •• " J , .
Said easement being for the purpose of installing.
constructing. operating. 'maintaining, removing. repairing.
replacing'and using a sewer interceptor and a district heating
and cooling system with ,all connections. manholes and
'appurtenances thereto, together with the right of ingress to
and egress from said described property for the foregoing
purposes. ';' :', ' :
Grantor further conveys and grants to the MUNICIPALITY a
temporary construction easement for all purposes during the
construction of' said, facilities over. aCl;oss. along. in. upon
and under the following described property:
Container Corporation of America
1st National Plaza' "
Chicago. Illinois 60670
. ' . .
,'-, . , "
ETS-30
Easement No} G-I0-2R
Revised:
, .
, , r
,
1
, ,
'i '
~ ",
I'
,I !
. ,
!
!
" ,
. :' .
",
:,' .
That portion of 'the said NW 1/4 of Section 24 and of 'the SW
'1/4 of'Section:13, Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.M ..
lying'Easterly!:of'the"Burlington Northern aild the Chicago.
• Milwaukee, Saint'Paul\andPacific Railroad Rights of Way
,~and lying Westerly'of:a line which is 90 feet Easterly of
~and'parallel'with"the,above described centerline,
:,' cont!lining '178', 300 square feet. more or less. '
, ,
',togetherwith'the right of ingress to and egress from said
, desctibed property for the foregoing purposes, said temporary
,~construction easement to commence on September 16, 1985. and to
, :terminate on the date"that surface reconstruction and
restoration work, has been approved by Grantor or on June 1.
1987,'whichever shall first occur. ,.
r '~> • , • ~
The Grantor hereby and the MUNICIPALITY, by accepting and
,recording this ,easement, mutually covenant and agree as follows:
, . -. ,.' ' .. " "
" '"
1. ',MUNICIPALITY shall, 'upon completion of the installation or
,construction of any facilities described herein. remove all
debris and restore the surface of ' the above described
property a~ nearly as practicable to the condition in which
.it, existed at the date of 'this agreement. . ~ .•..
• 'f ' , '\-. , ,. i
2., 'MUNICIPALITY shall.' if the above described property or,
~other propertY"of Grantor is disturbed by the operation.
~~:use.malfunction. maintenance, removal. repair or
":replacement ofthe.'facilities specified herein restore the
~ ,~ . ",
surface of the above described prope~ty as nearly as
practicable to the condition in which it existed at the
commencement of'said maintenance. removal. repair. or
replacement or'other activity.
, ,
3. ,MUNICIPALITY shall protect and save harmless Grantor from
any and all'claims, demands, loss, damage. expense and
. ,,:"'liability of every kind ,and description including personal
, , .injury and for any damage to or loss or destruction of
" property whatsoever ,suffered by Grantor. 'or by any persons.
, ; firms Or corporations," because of the construction.
, in*tallation, operation, use. malfunction. maintenance.
,'removal. repair or replacement of said facility or any
,other activities of MUNICIPALITY or its agents. contractors
',' ; ','or subcontractors.
"
'4. "All ri'9ht.:' title and' int~[est which may, be used and enjoyed
without interfering with the easement rights herein
-conveyed are,'[eserved to the Grantor. Afte[ the date of
, . .
,Container Corporation of America
1st National Plaza
Chicago. Illinois 60670
ETS-3D
Easement No. G-10-2R
Revised:
" " . >", .. '(-v"' ,', .
. .
"
. '.'
., ,", ,1,'<:",.",
>" ... \~."t': " :<,. ~"~'r3,;; " .. ,'" ¥' ,. : ~ \ • ~. <, ;:'1r" '. '. . -:" :~>. :; . , "
.i. . , . ,~~. '~', f ,,~. ," . '" .. >--'" .. ,:." .... "pane' 3' •. .; .. '.; ",' . If
.
"._' .,'/'0',"" '0 • " . . ",: '"1 4 .•. (Continued)' j.~ :,"
" .,
.: " this aqreement."theconstruction. installation or
c';,' , maintenance of'any structures. whether temporary or
,j.'" '-. . , . pei:manent. shall 'be 'absolutely prohibited wi thin ,the
I '; :, above~described~permanent easement area and shall be deemed
",. ',' ,,\ 'an'unreasonable,lnterference with the Municipality's
, '. ",\:: easement rights' unless specifically approved in writing by
" ,0":' ;,;: ,the Municipa 11 ty\·,: Moreover •. as to such structures. the ·::.::,c,· ·p.c?vi.sions pfPClragr~phl. 2 and,3 shall not apply.
. . . . . . , . . ~ . ..
S. Payment for the temporary construction easement herein
granted shall be made within 60 days of Grantor's approval
of the surface restoration work as hereinabove provided.
Payment shall be at the rate of Four Thousand Eighty Six
Dollars ($4.086)'per month or'fraction therof that said
temporary construction easement area is in actual use by
MUNICIPALITY; The term "actual' use" as used herein shall
commence on September 16. 1985. and shall extend to the
completion of work. including reconstruction and.
restoration,'of.aieas:affected by the construction. ,.
,.6. MUNICIPALITY shall pay up to $200.00 for expenses incurred
, by,Grantor for the expert evaluation of this easement under
,'" the. terms of, R.C.H. 8.25.020 •
. ,.' . . ,
DATED this 11th day of September. 1985 •
," '. • ,< •
. ·l .
.,CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
.. , ; ;..1:,',.: -
"'~:,:,::""" .. ,~.:.< ':,
:, ...
, ' , . ~~a"er;_
.. \ , '
,ATTEST:
.: '. t, .
T i .
. , ,
l .. ; ... \ ,.
, ,
" ..
,"':/ "
,.~. Senior Vice
I,'
':. ' , , " ".,
"State'of Illinois)
, '.) SS
, County of Cook' ),
, ,
,"
, ,
Subscribed
September.
,'.. "
and sworn ,to before me this
1985.
.. :" .. ~ .. . ' " .. . . ,
" . . -' :
President
'.
.. ; -
{. '. -. "::,"
." .!,"
• .' I'
. j My Commission Expii:es:
.~<'~:.:' '::.":~:: ': '~': "'r'f ' ~".<>~.
NotarYPUblic
,)J?,<t"mA,'" /7 /fO-
\. "
, ";
" , ,
.... '. ,"". l .' . ,"
., , , .
day of
, .
, ,
. ':.
"
~\
>
·r:,
1:
CHA5, " ---
\
\ : \
"
"
~:, .... , .,.
~
.,'
• '"
_. 1. :~,«
, .
~ -,~'
1r
• ""'1~_
. '-. -
'-".---~.
','
B> l,ttl'lIS -XEYISFP
:~i:~' ~""'-.)u-""~,~, "a:~"i'''';-~.~ ~~, ; '~~/r~ :,' ':~";~~~
\. :.j:.<-t',t:-' _.
8lJ£L1NGTtJN
~! ..
~,~
~~, ~ I~
OWNEf!. : CUlTAIN££ ctveP. OF AMERICA 0' 'I\j
TIlTAI. P~J!MANENT f.A<;EMENT AXEA s 3/, '00 S 5.;<; \...:
Tlm'II.' TEMPoI!AX'I CONSTJ!ucnON eA,E"'(fJ'IT AUA 2 178,100 t SF. I iJ\
M' TEM!: CONSTIWCTfON E5M" (ry,,) ~ "i,
--.
R.I? -.-..
,~.
"
--:
.." g"8
.. CU:
~;. ~
E$M'r ". :-
"
•• _ • MIIJii ....... icioOlity of " .. rwoIiton Stott ..
U R 5 ENGINfERS
RINTO" (HLUUn TflA"SFlR IYITI.
CONfAIN£1!. CtJRP. OF AMEf?!
'I
,"I
) 1
rRtJl'Oseo £A5tMcNTS US -3 .
! ., , "'i
i ,~:-
~ "'" -. -~ '.
• ~ • > -
-)~-;~~-,-, . ·1
~
iR~ . ....... ~
" '" 'I.
. - -....
t-.J
~
-:.:.-........
...:
~
~
. ::" ".~'
"'-: ~ -.,
'.
1
i '.
";r
d ..... , tJ .'. ~ .~. ":'/ '~~'.~:'.~ '. rY:>o.:7",,-,
:: " ....
-.
r
OWN£e: Cl>NTAIN£i!. COR/'.' OF AME21CA
, . ~EfHO . z·
.TEM!'.· CLWSr.eUC;'ON e5Mr . •
Z/Y I'EKMAHeJir eA5eMENr . . ~ ~ .
~
"' ""'1 .. "0
. ...: .
, .
o
../ // ........ ----
" . --:,..-""---.....-_---+-.--..:,.-~,c;-.--:-;~
"'"--.. .. .' .--::: --. -.
t)". ._~--t-----
,,p/, ,,11' . v..J . ..• ;~ts .. ' tl£l'..tl
. 'Y~~; 1~~rflO~l--
, t~bl0rt ". ~ .. ~9" .U~t.." . '. -,~y'-,. ,"
,
~
NOe.THU.N £.R. . .. ...
1»" J-I1S
" ,~"
~ > ._-... ,.. -
. ..
" Sean',
EERS I
IUNTO" ."lUI'" 1""'''1'.'' 'V"'III
rlWTAINI'P rflPp tlI= AMFl'lrA
....... I·.·JW~ I
J(1'tr, rf·tJ·4'
/
, '
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~
FOR PROPERTY ACQ~ISITIOX
CO~TAI;';ER CORP.
ATTACHHENT AA
That portion of the ;';W 1/4 of Section Z4. Township 23 ;';orth, Range 4 East.
W.~., described as follows:
J '
Commencing at a point on the North line of said Section 24 which is South
87· 29~'2G" East 1156.77 feet from the Korthwest corner thereof; thence
South 2 30' ~4" West 916.42 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S~uth
53 42' 00" East 445 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Honster
Road; thence along said Westerly margin South 18 ,~4' 04" West 31.37 feet
to a point on ~ curve from which the radial center bears North 71 25' 56"
West 256.48 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve concave
to the Nor~hwest 128.92 feet;'thence South 47 22' 04" West 121.88 feet to
a,point on a curve from, which the radial center bears South 42 37' 56"
East 250.37 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve concave
to the Southeast 91.01 feet; thence leaving said margin North 48 15' 01"
West 420.00 feet; thence Korth 8 59' 17" East 125.0~ feet; thence North
46 14' 13" East 'Z19.70'feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 161,800
square feet" more or less.
"
. ,
,',
.' •
;j
~ , \.. ~.:r ~~"\,
~~.'\ '~
~ '-I >, , .,-',
.'
.t ~ ~J
v+~{ ~.Vf' ..
fit
~~
%''\, ~
",'" W' ~
iR
~
~~'\ ~~~ "\-
<~y \ .'1:1 /' \
~\/ R=l?6.4&· , ~ .,.f/ L·'Z8.~%·.
s>. ,*3". S,3'4'Z'O~ "'.8'-y~?i"" . ~ d' %&'.0 DO
... . ... -" "'" ..... \J\ I -~ :--1,' b. ~ tll ~'t ~
~ ~ I'>~ ,'Z' ,7' 56"e i -~!------.... ~ --"':. -;4 .
-~ to: •
\~ d"s. ~a .> .' 4Z0.0 :....-.--?~17_ . 0' .~ ~OI'W"
•
,
OWNEI! CONTAIN£I! CORP. OF IIMt:R.rCA
8UI:LINGTON IYOI:THERN R. R.
------.-------_.
ew." tt.M
... Cl.~
;;::;:;;;u-
\~. ~ ~\ '. //"-
(~"" ,/ ----/
'~">-. /" ... .-:----:-----.... .. --~ ",-. _? r~_----::-~
~ ...... .1 ___ --~
TAX LOT 0 ~;-y/
rI~l~.. .
,f.IOrl ~ . BtJ~~I~~ .
L'
--~------
~
~
0"'" i RO M~icipalil, of IroIlirtIPOliton SeaMI,
U R S ENGINEERS
RENTON lfflUENT 'fR-ANS"-(R1VST(W
FfELiM/NAI?Y MUNC¥I£Y 5Kt.TCH
CONTA/NEe U:fl'. 01' IJMU-/CA
..., ,··'00'
,lfill'lI fI-tJ-4
__ I fII I
1 , " ' }' , ,;
'.' . ";,. ' (
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
.
'Attad'a'nent Nl
Pae;e 1.
1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
CRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORD INC ,NUMBER:
Creen, River Flood Control Zone
District
Rie;ht of way entry for survey and
eXploration
Portion of said premises
May 26, 1967 (Acknowlede;ed)
. June 13, 1967
6188802
2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREbF:
CRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
DATED: '
RECORDED:
RECORDINC NUMBER:
Creen River Flood Control Project
Wine; wall
Portion of said premises
January 21, 1970 (Acknowledged)
January 26, 1970
6613113
3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
CRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:'
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
,
City of Renton, a municipal
corporation
Constructinq, operating and
maintaining, pipelines for the
transportation of water
The easterly portion of said premises
June 5, 1973,
August 15, 1973
7308150528
4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a
Washington corporation
Underground electric system
The easterly portion of said premises
February 27, 1979
March 14, 1979
7903140795
(continued)
, .
•. ,0
> ;';.
, . ,-., -....
,.Attac:b:aent lIB
'~ge 2
5. ,Payment of Real Estate, Excise, Tax, if required.
The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of
local,taxing authority of unincorporated King County.
,Present ,Rate of Real Estat~ Excise Tax as of .the date herein is
1.32%;
6. GENERAL TAXES: . FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1; SECOND HALF DELINQUENT
NOVEMBER 1:'
, YEAR:
AMOUNT' BILLED:'
AMOUNT PAID:
AMOUNT DUE:
TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER:
. LEVY CODE:· ' :
1985
$50,074.80
$25,037.40
$25,037.40
242304-9008-04
4175
7. SPECIAL TAXES' (OR FOREST' FIRE' PROTECTION TAXES): FIRST BALE
DELINQUENT MAY 1; SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1:
~ , .,
' •. YEAR: .:
AMOUNT BILLED:
AMOUNT PAID:
AMOUNT DUE:,
, TAX AccouNT NUMBER: ,"
, " .' .
, .
'.'1
. ~" '. " .. "'~,;'
:. "j' ~
!".-.. ' , ;"'"
<." • '. I
, . I' ,
". , '"
~, ,
1985
$229.98
$114.99
$114.99
242304-9008-04
.'
. .
~~m'ET'~~" , ~~' . ~'lli~~"
, , Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle .....
Exdla''!,'C UI.t/:, • 611 S<:n?pd Ave., Seallle, Washington 98104
~' . t : ", " " .' ." . .:
!lllgUst 21, 1985
Nr. James"p •. Charpie,. ,~li1llaCJer'
,Real Estate' Construction Corp .
. :Purchasing Department' ','
, Contdiner Corporation of !lmericLl
'500 ELlSt ,-North !lvenlle ',d.
' ..
Carol St rei'1I1l , IL 60188,
,~', ,
Hen ton E. '1'. S. ' .•
. . .:, -, ~' ~
, ,
; ,
'lIill'Survev Mid !lcqul."ition ConLlitiOlls
,Dear Nr. Charple:'
, .' ,.
The an~i1 of tll'= htll to qe purchilsed by ~Jetro ,as depictp,1
,in the appraisal diilyrilm has been surveyed. That ar(~,l is
3.71 acres or 161,759 :square feet. Diagrams ilnd a survey
.report are enc losed.·
In the letter to you 'dated !ltiCJust 11., 19U5, n~Cfal:d.ing tll(!
pUI'chase of that h.111side at your Henton, \'lasll.1nqton p1i1111:,
t\~O conditions were not addressed.
1. Hight of First Heftlsal
The intent uf this cOflclition is as follows: This riqht will
be reserved to Container' Corporation ,of !lmerica. The futlll:('
sales price \~ould be at market value determined by an indep.'nrlent:
apprnisal., This right could not be trnnsferrec1, "sold or
ass igned.
2. Surqe 'fow()r' Odor COli trol
Netro's sanitary engineers and consultants, UHS l~n9.1neers,
do not believe that 'a noticeable odor will emanate from tilis
tOVJer. c, Tile reasons are:"
", '
a) This is secondary effluent -chemically treated
with 90+ percent'of the solids removerl.
b)
c)
The odor causing substance II. Swill ri.se undel'
',nonllill' circumstances -dissipilting into tile ilt\ll,,),;pllf~n!.
Cil~Cllllttion. will,toke place (hle to pr(~S~;III~e Cll;lllql~~,;
frolll the pUllIpS at tile> p(\mp ,-;t.1 t ion ,.nd telllpel',. 1:(1 1:')
difference of the l;fflucnt in 1:11., I'jpe <lntl in U,,'
tanK.
:, .. '
','
.. '
.. i''':, ",: .. ", .
."'.
',I" \'l
/,
;~', :' '
" '."
,"" f
.. '
.),<, "I\tlllospheric dissipation will
of pipe is 27 ,','feet 'above top
" "
be
of
excellent
hill.
N6 6dor corltrol lueasures , for ':the surge tank are planned.
:" .. '. '" ~
, '.1 f 'I" can; prov ide you' 'further in forllla t ion,
-i, ,\. ,'. ' , ' ", " ,...
" " '" ' ,I ',',. ~dtrUlj)Y: YOll~:~,~,
':~ @~~~ej(~~ " , m~;l~ ~'~,'
i Susan ,.~I.' Solberg V," ", ;a~~" '
,Right~of~way ~ Property Supervisor
SNS: mhy16/ 4.,',
""Enclosure. "." ',.', ,
"cc: . Hr. 'John ",Gardner'
, ,"I
'"
,'\ ' '"
, -;
.. ,
'.'
,/ • "
", ",'
; \.,'
-',,' r, .
, . , ,
, ,
,1 •
, '
I "
, ' ,
, L,
\ " {~i"
\ . .', l
b ".' ,
":' .
'" ;,'
, '
",
. ':', j
. ~ .
" '"
, 'j,
-; , \,~
,., ' .. ,:" ,I
, -,-.' '!'~ ~'.>,:>. ~ ::"-\-\,:,~, ,
'. '
,.' ;, ".' -'\,
'\ "',' "
.. ... -
/' '
"
, ' . -,.' :-:
,
, . ,"
'.,. ,', -; ' .
. "
"
"
".
, ..
, .v.
.....
"
"
,
(.llease call lIIe.
.'
. ;
"
"
" j ."
. / "0 •
:".,
..
'"
, .. ', /,
;
.~,:' ;
P,iRll1.
, ~:~ :/..'
., .'
',',
.;,~ ;-
"
"
INrfRCEvrOR. E!>mi :;"":f~/,:)J:,/ ":.,:, . ~:'1.~,~;::,.~,
',' '<, -
".'~
. ~'i , ,:,~"
" -'.' ~.;\ ~ ',.'~f~~, ¥< ;,}
,;'" 1"-.. ,:, :',\.
"-. -.
,
" ': ,.,
,',
"
.'
,,'
I
,
------
, .
• ~l
~ •
'.J
.'
NORTH
, .:
EAST
[j5140~,0201
'. " ~ r •• ,
651111.2031· ,
\ ",' ' '~:;r:" }t:. ' ';-0", ,', -',-..
" , .'
651269.0732
, .
651620.5"'3
. .
. ", ,,2235. SIJ' 1,8 34'04.44" ·.<,:,31.37)~4.2666:'!74923.52G9 651618.5218
',,' " FROM'a2666 TO PTA (,PUJ',:::<1.513:,··' "
• ',,',;':: (PC~::G,66 • RP:~,'ISI3{ :.PO INT.'OF; iX0NG~.NCY !# ::26G5:' ',)
),'.: :' Arc .~ Chord :.1 an ;Ex t ,M" d 'Ord ,Oe Lt'a, c hor.d : t an , to Set bac 1'.7 '.< AICITIE I MIOIS ) :
'. ' .. ' CURVE' INVERSE:' . \' , ", > .. " ".. ". '':<'" .' , '
,'" •• ". "0 •• ,. ;' •• ," ":"'-~' .,,:'.;~.':~~ ' •• -"
;,,-. " " •. ,,", ,. ,. -,. -". NORTH EAST <,' PC""'>: . ';,'; CHORD'BRG, CENGTI'I,. ,PT
., .. " 2666 •..• 51.1',32 58'04.44~ .' 127:568,0:2665 :' 1.7481.6.5004 ',651549.1032
:. ' •. : • ) .• " :/' " • J ,-"' .. , ::
. '-'
"" ..
",;: ,,' '" DELTA,>"':: ARC" 'Rr NOATIi'
175005. I 973 ~28 40'00.00"'
'"
"RADIAL PC·RP
NIJ ',71 25'55.56"
, TANGENT PC,PI
SIJ 18' 34 '04 .44"
FHOM'.. OEARING/ANGLE
T Ml LENS TH '
65.8529:
·1 .
DISTANCE
T ,'\NGENT PI'I' T
,'SIJ ' 47 22'04.44"
TO . NORTH
~:'" ':~~;1.~2~:: T,O :,H, '[.'.P.i
U
J : 2G6;\~ i,:,·':t,,"
... . f ' .',,~ ':.
,-,,. . .~.
, EAST
65137S.3n3
DEG OF CURVE
·22
, .
20'21,40"
EXTERNAL
8.319~
. E,)5 T
Page
-:. .. " .
(LEV
ELEV
ELEV
MID orlO
8.0570
'". :
"
. ' . '
."
::.,:-'. z-.
;.
"
. ,
" .'
"'."
" ," , '
, . '
'.~ .
" : ' -.
. ,:
. r:
~ .. , '., . .
.'
'~ .
,
'. :
. " . . ' ~', .;..:
,.
.,'
".,' , .
:,f
-:.
I ~ •.
. '" '
,-.;
,'. ~
, ,
174733.9526 651459.4339
2253'03.99"
NORTH ....
SO FT'
,161758.8651 ,
1 .. f~~ '''~'. .....
" '!>\.
'.
, ;,
.. , '
EXTERNAL
: , 4 • 1933
EAST
ACRES
3.713473
;
..'
'.
", .
, .
[LEV
'[LEV
MIO ORO
4.1242
.ELEV
,r , f
I
I
I
',' 'I ,r,
"
,
3",:
'. '
" . .,.
"".'
. '
"
I , ,"
" .,,' ,
,.t"
"
, f
',I.
" , ..
.. :'
'J •.
,.,'"
I,'
, ..
" ..
"
"
' .. : ~: :.
: • f.'. .'" ,
"
,: .'
"l,
•• ~ i· .
'1 ~ .• ~:
, " ,',j
, ,
"
" ""
, ,~ .
'.
;~ ..
, , '
.:, j
(''-~'1,n(t'''r:''1:'?iI,~H'' .;·!~r::~:;~: ~A:'~ ~
, ' ,
.. '.
"', .
" '"
' .... ', ..
,,'
-:', .
"
:ir ;,'
"
~", .
: -...
. ",'
" ....
. ' i' .,-" .",
"
, I
'" ~ ,
-.':.'
~ j
"
"
. ,'~ ,
~'.-'
. ...
"
",
,.'!
';.,
." ,'A
Short Subdivisions
The purpose of this Bulletin is to help you understand
the requirements for short subdividing property in
unincorporated King County, to guide you through
, the process, and to help you anticipate problems you
may encounter. It Is not Intended to replace legal,
engineering or other professional services.
,Rather, this Bulletin is designed to help you decide
when you may need such aSSistance.
What is a short subdivision?
When you want to sell, trade or give away a portion of
your property, you must subdivide it first. There are
two ways to do this: one is ''formal" subdivision, the
other is short subdivision. If you are dividing your
property into a total of four or fewer . lots, short
subdivision is the easier of the two methods. The land
which is so divided is called a short subdivision.
You must go through the short subdivision process in
order to get the necessary public approval of the lots
you want to create. Everyone who shares an ,.
ownership interest in the property (spouse; partner,
mortgage company, real estate contract holder, etc.)
must agree to the short subdivision.
What is a short plat?
A short plat is a map of your short subdivision. See
Figures 1 and 4 for an example of a short subdivision.
Figure 1 shows the proposed short subdivision as
drawn for the preliminary application. Figure 4 is a
map of the same short subdivision as submitted with
, the final recording forms.
1
Why are short
subdivisions necessary?
State and County laws require short subdivisions in
order to:
o ensure that the new lots meet minimum zoning
. requirements for building;
o protect the interests ofthe seller, buyers, builders
and neighbors;
o prevent or solve drainage problems, access and
traffic safety problems, and public health hazards;
C plan wisely for community growth; and
o maintain accurate public records of land divisions.
The laws governing subdivisions are Chapter 58.17
of the Revised Code of Washington and King County
Code Chapter 19.26. You can look them up at public
libraries or the King County Law Library (sixth floor of
the King County Court House). You can buy a copy of
the County Code at the Building and Land Develop-
ment Division (BALD), Room 450 of the King County
Administration Building.
When must I short subdivide?
Before you sell, trade orgive away any portion of your
property, you must short subdivide it. For example, if
you want to sell half of an existing lot, you must first
subdivide it into two lots, the one you want to keep
and the one you want to sell.
When is it not neceSSBt;;' to sho:-t
subdivide?
If the portion of your property that you want to sell is
already a legal lot, you do not need to short subdivide
it in order to sell it. For more information on what a
legal lot is, see Bulletin # 2.
,',
I
I·
I'
, ,
1-t-/z,'ri=r:: ~~"-1
.\ , I ~.).,.,
I '"
I ~,
I f"'--!,--~>!J~ ----1 I I
I , I
I ~ I
I
1..
~ I
I ----iJ , ..
Figure 1 Drawing of proposed shorl subdivision
There-are '. other • .times 'when' short subdivision"
approval is not' needed:
1. When each of the new lots is 20 acres or larger.
2. When'you are giving or selling'land to'a govern-,
ment agency ora public utility company;'
3. When you are making a minor lot line adjustment.
These require review and approval by BALD.
4. ' When you are releasing or receiving a portion of a
property by partial fulfillment deed. .
5. When a will which legally divides property is
executed.
Please note: If you use these exceptions you may be
creating lots which do not meet County loning,
health, or access requirements, and which therefore
will not be legal building sites. Be sureto check with
8 short subdivision technician.
What if land is sold without first being
subdivided?
Civil suit and/or criminal prosecution against both the
seller and agent may result. A person who knowingly
buys a lot that was not legally created will not be able
, 2
to get building and other permits for the property.
Also, if you try to comply with the law after the sale, all
of the people then involved may not be willing to
cooperate with you .
You may offer lots for sale prior to short plat approval.
Lots may be advertised, and earnest money may
even be paid, but title cannot be transferred until the
short subdivision approval is recorded. Such sales
oHers should be carefully worded to comply with state
law-you could be sued if the short subdivision
approval and conditions do not agree with the terms
of the oHer you have made.
How many lots can I make?
No more than four lots are permitted within a short
subdivision in unincorporated King County.
However, you may have two or more short sub-
divisions. side by side, thereby creating more than four
lots, under the following rules:
1. Five-acre and larger lots. If all of your new lots
are at least five acres, there is no limit to the
number 01 short subdivisions you may have within
one ownership.
2. Smaller lots. If any of the new lots are smaller
than five acres, you may create a maximum of
eight lots.
Lots can also be created and deSignated as "non-
building" lots if they are for agricultural, forestry or
open space purposes only. Such lots must have legal
access and meet the minimum lot area requirement
of the zone, and will be subject to restrictive
covenant. They cannot be developed as residential
building sites while so designated.
"Tracts" may also be created, in addition to lots, when
short subdividing.The term "tract", when used in this
connection, refers to land reserved for special uses
for the short subdivision, such as open space (see
Example C in Figure 3), surface water retention,
utilities, or access. These tracts are generally not
counted as lots nor considered as building sites.
How soon can I short subdivide the
same property again?
You must wait five years to short subdivide a lot
created by short subdivision. If you do not wantto wait
five years to create more than four lots, you must use
the formal subdivision process. This requires a public
hearing before the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner
. and approval by the King County Council.
You may change lot lines or add new lots during those
five years by a "revision" as long as you do not create
a total of more than four lots, including the ones you
created originally, within the boundaries of the
original short subdivision. The revision will go through
the same process as the original short subdivision. To
revise your short subdivision you need the agree-
ment of everyone who has an ownership interest in it.
Costs depend on many factors. Some or all of the
County fees listed below must be paid, depending on
the specific situation. These fees are subject to
change by the King County Council, and are usually
adjusted every year. Refer to the current list of fees,
available at BALD, for specific amounts.
C> BALD preliminary application fee
(\) State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) fee
(\) Health Department review fees
(') Department of Public Works Surface Water
Management fees
e> Department of Public Works plan and profile
review fee
e BALD final short plat review fee
o Department of Public Works final short plat
review fee
e Division of Records and Elections recording fee
You may incur other costs for some or all of the
following, or other expenses, depending on your
specific situation: ,"
Preapplication
Consultation
SEPA, Right-oIWay.
Variance APp1iCations,~
Sensitive Area or ! .
Shorelines Review, ), ., '1-
May Be Required ) ~l:T ... -~-,,··,_, __ r"J ;-, """" """;:<';" f,,'
Submit Application •.
Pay Application Fee '.' ,
• Consultants' fees for preparing applications
o Water and sewer district certificates of availability
(vary by district)
• Costs associated with determining site's suitabil--
ity for on-site sewage disposal (septic tanks and
drainfield)
• Special studies, such as a soils report
• Short plat title certificate
• Engineering costs for preparation of surface
water drainage plans, and street plans and
profiles
• Costs of constructing and installing roads, the
water supply, and sewer lines
• Performance and maintenance bonds
• Fees for preparation of final short plat by land
surveyor
What procedures must I follow?
Obtaining approval of a short subdivision is a two-
step process. First, you must file an application with
BALD, whose planners will review it and issue a
preliminary approval, together with a list of
conditions. These conditions, which you must meet in
order to get final approval, usually relate to zoning,
roads, environmental requirements, public health
(water supply and sewage disposal) and fire safety.
Second, you must satiSfy the conditions and pay the
required fees, in orderto receive final approval. When
Notice to,Neighbors
and/or Additional ~
In/ormation May Be I ".'
Required
You May Appeal
Figure 2 Synopsis o'.key steps in the short subdivision process
3
you receive your preliminary IIpproval and list of
conditions, be sure to examine them carefully
before embarking on steps toward final approval,
to be sure that you can satisfy the conditions.
More details about these procedures are set forth
below. '
1. Filing your application. Obtain an applica-
tion form and instructions at BALD. Before you fill out
the form, you should discuss your application with a
short plat techniCian, to be sure you know what is
needed. At this time you should determine zoning
requirements for your proposal (see Bulletin #17),·
find out if you will be affected by SEPA, whether your
property is within deSignated sensitive areas, and
probable access, drainage and utility requirements.
Please note that while the technician or planner will
try his or her best to cover all aspects of your proposal
during a preapplication review, more intensive
investigation of your'application may reveal other
problems or issues that must be resolved. You must
pay the application fee when you apply.
2. Review. Your proposed short subdivision will be
reviewed by a planner, to ensure that it is consistent
with County requirements. This usually takes about
four weeks, although some cases with critical or·
complex concerns may take longer. Longer review
time may also be needed during busy periods (usually
in the spring). The review will include a visit to the site.
As a result of this review, you may have to submit
additional information or revise your proposal. Upon
completion of the review, you will receive either
preliminary approval subject to conditions, or notice
of denial setting forth the reasons for denial.
3. Preliminary approval. Most applications .
receive preliminary approval. Every approval will be
subject to some conditions. All conditions must be
satisfied· within one year, although a one-year
extension is available upon written request. The .
following discusses the most usual and most
significant types of conditions which may be required .
. . ". l ... ' " ",
~', -:,., '.' .
a. Public streets and private roads .
One of the key requirements for short subdivisions is
adequate access-streets and roads. Providing'
Pay Final Fees,
Taxes If Owed.
Satisly Conditions
4
access is also likely to be' one of the most costly
requirements. The County will determine whether the
short subdivision can be served by private streets, or
if public streets must be constructed.
Public streets.-You may be required to dedicate
(deed) some of your land to widen an existing public
street right-of-way, in order to extend the existing
neighborhood street pattern to serve your property,
or to assure that access for future development is
adequate. You may also be required to improve a
pubiic street if the existing construction is sub-
standard.
Private roads.-Private roads may be permitted when
no public right-of-way is needed, no public safety
hazards will result, and only a limited number of lots
are being served. The right-of-way and improvement
requirements for private roads vary greatly
depending on lot size, the potential and actual
number of lots served, and the existing street
network. You may be required to construct or improve
roads both on and off the site to provide adequate
access.
In order to satiSfy road improvement conditions, you
must obtain approval of your design plans by the
Department of Public Works, which will also have to
inspect and approve the construction. You may post
bonds or other acceptable security to guarantee
completion of required improvements within one year
after Ii nal approval.
b. Drainage
The King County Department of Public Works
Surface Water Management Division will review your
short subdivision if:
" two or more vacant lots smaller than 35,000
square feet are created;
• the site contains streams, drainage courses,
wetlands, or a portion of any water body;
e the site is within or adjacent to a flood piain; or
• the site lies within a drainage area designated as
critical by Surface Water Management.
You may be required to have a drainage plan,
showing the proposed drainage system, prepared by
an engineer. Typical requirements include on·site
water retention facilities, stream bank improvements,
building setbacks, and drainage easements.
In order to satisfy drainage conditions, you must
obtain approval of your design plans by the
Department of Public Works, which will also have to
inspect and approve the construction. You may post
bonds or other acceptable security to guarantee
completion of required improvements within one year
after final approval.
•• •
General information is available from Surface Water
Management on the ninth floor of the King County
Administration Building (phone 344'3874). .
" ,,.,
c. Public health
If all lots are five acres or larger, no Health
Department approval is necessary. When a short
subdivision Includes lots that are smaller than five
acres, the Health Department must approve water
supply and means of sewage disposal for the
subdivision. An individual well on any lot smaller than
five acres is not permitted. Contact the district office
in your area for information. (See Bulletin # 1 for
phone numbers and addresses.)
d. Fire safety
Fire hydrants and water mains may be required if the
F E
3 1 2 3 4
c---------
,I' --------
1 2 3 4
--------
2
1
L.-.....I .
A.··
Figure 3 Examples of short subdivisions
Example A: A typical two-lot short plat with lot 2 having Its own
access (referred to as a "pipestem" or "flag" lot). No access
improvements are required. Access for lot 2 could also, have been
by easement over part of lot 1, rather than through a pipestem.
Examplo B: A four-iol short pial with lot 4 leN large to permil a
future short subdivision in five years. Remember, you must wait five
years before you can short subdivide a short subdivided lot.
Examplo C: This is a four·lot short plat with an opon space tract on
the lake thai is jointly owned by owners of the four lois. The tract is
not counted as 8 lot. .
5
lots in your short subdivision are smaller than 35,000
square feet. Actual requirements will depend on the
number of lots served, existing water pressure and
capacity, fire hydrant location and accessibility for
firefighting equipment. For details, consult the Fire
Marshal's office on the third floor of the King County
Administration Building (phone 344-2693).
e. Taxes
All past·due property taxes must be paid before the
short subdivision can be recorded.
4. Appeals
Any decision by a County agency relating to a short
subdivision, such as an approval, disapproval, or
specific condition or requirement, can be appealed
"
B
1
1
'.;'
'. : .,' 'l~'
. ,',;' .~ t '
" .' .--~ .. :;. ..
2 3
~
2 3 .....
' .
4 "
' ..
~ x·' , ': ':'!'"
>,--
'.
.. .~
Example D: Here an applicant owns two adjoining parcels of land.
He submits two applications, each having four lots, with a common
cul-de~c road serving the lots. Note: The total maximum number
of lots you can create is eight if any of the lots is less than five acres.
Example E: This is a S0-acre parcel of land. The applicanl has
divided it into three 20'acre parcels without a short subdivision (20-
acre parcels Bre exempt), Then each parcel is short subdivided into
four five·acre lots. (Remember, if all the lots are at least five acres
you can have any number of shan subdi .... isions.)
Examplo F: This is a 30·acre parcel of land. It is short subdivided
Into two five-acre lots and a 20-acre lot. Lol 3 (Ihe 20-acre 101) can
be short subdivided again into four five·acre lots. (Note that 20·
acre lots created by 8 short subdivision can be short subdivided
again without waiting five years.)
.. . . ~
by any person to the King County Zoning and
Subdivision Examiner.
It is important that you review carefully all the
conditions of your approval to be sure you think they
are reasonable, and that you will be able to meet
them. These conditions can be appealed to the
Examiner, but only within 1 0 days of the mailing olthe
notice of BALD's action. If you wish to appeal, you
must file with BALD a written notice setting forth your
. reasons, together with the required fee. After the 10
days have passed, it is no longer possible to appeal.
The Examiner will hear the matter at a scheduled
public hearing, usually about six to eight weeks after
the appeal is filed. The Examiner's decision is final.
Any further appeal must be to Superior Court.
Appeals from decisions of the Health Department are
handled somewhat differently. Contact the district
office in your area for information. '" '
5. Recording
Once you have fulfilled the approval conditions, you
must complete the final short plat forms. which will
have been sent to you with your preliminary approval,
and. return them together with the short plat title
certificate. When you submit these forms to BALD,
the final review fee and Department of Public Works
pla,n checking fee must be paid.
Before final recording, the Department of Public
Works will review the final short plat to be sure that
the information is correct. Also, this review will ensure
that a land surveyor can survey the new lots using this
information. This will save headaches for future
owners or builders and help protect you from future
boundary disputes.
The Department of Assessments will review and
approve the final recording form.
After approvals have been obtained from the.
Departments of Public Works and Assessments,
BALD will notify you of the exact recording fee. Upon
receiving it, BALD will do the necesary recording and
send you a copy of your final short plat.
Once the short plat is recorded, the proposed lots will
• nulldln. ~~'''.r~ "''1ulrN',''n, '" , .. ,,.kul ••• 'd
fru .. thl" I",.·.
rtood 1'0R'rol .......... ftt 10 rln~ I·"un.~: \!r.~ur~d
, .. ,,. "'I' ,,' ~."k . hnd .. ,d I~ 1,·.· ••
No "ItUrl""'~, fIll. or ohol"I<"II<>n. Ahall I,,·
.1l".NI wllhln ,I". 11,,,.d plain,
\." I " • n"m_"ull~lnK In!, N" "tru~'ur .. " '0'
" ..... n h~hl'.II"" '" ,,~ •• ~1t.11 "" ,,,,,,,,It ,.·,1.
(A~rlr"I." .. 1 "Ir"r'u, .. ~ "nd u""~ ~H,"I't .. d II
.110.~d hy ,It,· ~."" .. "\'~~Irl(".tl"n.)
I .. p on f,t •• " ... ~"
I
' .. "d,,, ., _/_
J'~ '<>0'
<aa •• -====-=_= ~ 10<>
Figure 4 Drawing o//inal short plat
be legal lots and can then be built on, sold or
transferred.
Additional information
If you need additional information, please call the
short subdivision technician at 344-7980, or visit
BALD's office at 450 King County Administration
Building between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday (except holidays).
Note: BALD Development Assistance Bul/etins 'and other writ/en Inlormarion should not be used
as substitutes lor codes and ,egulations. You should reviewal/ the details 01 your project to be
sure they comply with the applicable codes and regulations.
Othor relevant Development
Assistance Bulletins:
*1 Important Building and Development Permit
Phone Numbers
*2 Whal is a "'egal" building 1017
*17 King County Zoning Code Synopsis
., B Options lor clustering, flexible lot sizGS and
setback variations
*21 The Sens.illve Area Roview Process (SAR.P.)
11/85
Building lind Le>nd Development Divlaion
450 King County Administration Building, SOO
Fourth Avenue. Seallie. WA 98104
TelephOne (206) 344·7980
6
Ea~tsida Oranch (Mail fOf Bolh"!vuo shotJld be sonllo
the Seattle address): 475· 112th Avenue
Southeast. 8ollevue. WA 98004
Telephone (206) 344·6740
King County
Real Property Division
Department of
Executive Administration
50DA King County Administration Building
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 344-3970
December 4, 1986
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA, 98055
ATTN: Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
RE: Annexation -Monster Road S_W.
Tax Lot 80, Sec. 13-23-4
Dear Mr. Munson:
';11 I -.It-KeNTON
DEC 101986
POUCY
DEVELOPMf'f"r nFpT
This office has contacted King County Division of Parks and Recreation
regarding Renton's proposed annexation along Monster Road S.W. We have
been informed by them that they have no objection to 'the annexation.
Regarding our signature on the petition, it is the County's policy to
refrain from signing petitions in order to not influence other property
owners in the area.
If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
/JO._~, J...~J;.~ ~ Loutsis, Manager
Real Property Division
pecember I. 1986
Sewer: Merriman Request
for Sewer Connection
CONSENT AGENDA
Vacation: Whitworth
Avenue South, VAC-006-
86, Old Milwaukee
Substation
CAG: 075-86, Park
Avenue N/N 3rd Street
Improvements
CAG: 076-86, Park
Avenue N/N 4th Street
Improvements
Finance: LID 313, Talbot
Road
Claim: Dillon, CL-65-86
Claim: Hartman, CL-64-
86
Annexation: Covenant
Church 10% Petition and
Rezone
Annexation: Container
Corporation of America
10% Petition and Rezone
CAG: 009-86, 1986
Sunset Sewer Grouting,
Phase III
CORRESPONDENCE
Citizen Commen t:
Vaupel -Utility
Rates, Land Use,
Emergency Planning
C" C ·1 M·'· RentQDltyouncl1Dutes Page 148
Bill Merriman, 5 I 03 155th Place SE, Bellevue, described septic failure at his
rental home at 10715 138th Avenue SE, Renton, noting bathroom facilities
have been unusable by tenants for the past 10 days. He requested approval
by Council to connect to the City of Renton sewer system. Mayor Shinpoch
explained Council policy to require annexation and a letter from Seattle/King
County Health Department verifying that a health hazard exists before they
will consider such requests. Mr. Merriman advised that a representative of
the Health Department has inspected the site but failed to give letter
verifying health hazard as adjacent property is not affected. MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS
MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. Council President Mathews
requested that an emergency Committee meeting be called if the
Administration determines that the problem can be resolved immediately.
CARRIED.
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
City Clerk submitted Old Milwaukee Substation petition for vacation of
portion of Whitworth Avenue South abutting the railroad right-of-way,
VAC-006-86. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting
public hearing on January 12, 1987, and to Board of Public Works for
advisability of street vacation.
City Clerk reported bid opening 11/21/86 for Park Avenue North and North
3rd Street Improvements; 3 bids received; Engineer's estimate: S3 1,780.00.
Refer to Transportation Committee.
City Clerk reported bid opening 11/21/86 for Park Avenue North and North
4th Street Improvements; 3 bids received; Engineer's estimate: S24,745.00.
Refer to Transportation Committee.
Finance Department requested interfund loan in tile amount of S12,025.44 for
Local Improvement District 313, Talbot Road. Refer to Ways and Means
Committee.
Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Lora Mae Dillon, 2 I 6
Garden Avenue North, for damage to ring allegedly caused by Renton jail
staff (11/24/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim for damages in the amount of S274.35+ filed by Mary J. Hartman,
20301 SE 353rd, for plumbing expenses at 504 Williams Avenue South
allegedly caused by settling of roadway (1/85-8/86). Refer to City Attorney
and insurance service.
Policy Development Department requested consideration of Covenant Church
10% Annexation Petition and Rezone; approximately 23.7 acres located on the
south side of SE Carr Road approximately 1350 feet east of Talbot Road
South (including right-of-way). Council set public meeting on December 15,
1986.
Policy Development Department requested consideration of Container
Corporation of America 10% Annexation Petition and Rezone; approximately
45.08 acres located along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000
block. Council set public meeting on December 15, 1986.
Public Works/Utility Engineering Department submitted CAG-009-86, 1986
Sunset Sewer Grouting, Phase III; and requested approval of the project,
authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 3~-day lien period,
and release of retained amount of S2,319.78 to contractor, Gelco Grouting
Service, Inc., if all required releases have been received. Council concur.
MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
Letter was read from Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, expressing
concern regarding continual high increases in utility rates; need for additional
staff to enforce conditions imposed by Hearing Examiner; and need for plans
to respond to any and all City emergencies and catastrophies.
December I. 1986
OLD BUSINESS
Community Services
Committee
Parks: Housing &
Community
Development Block
Grant Funds, 1986
Parks: Heather Downs
Park Master Plan,
Consultant
Parks: Cedar River
Natural Zone Master
Plan, Consultant
Parks: Trails Master
Plan, Consultant
Finance: Developer Fees
Fire: Training Center
Ways and Means
Committee/Planning and
Development Committee
Joint Committee Report
Final PUD: Leady/Parker
FPUD-02-85
, Renton City Council Minutes Page 149
Community Services Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report
recommending approval of the following appropriations for the unallocated
1986 Community Development Block Grant Population Funds:
Housing Repair Program (HCD/C751-86)
000/000/20.559.27.45.02 (Equipment Rental), $250
000/000/20.559.27.49.50 (Misc./Solid Waste Fees), $2,000
Cedar River Trail Design (HCD/C790-86)
000/000/20.559.29.41. 73 (Consultants/Purchasing Services), $6,613
Highlands Neighborhood Center, Phase III (HCD/C673-86)
000/000/20.594.06.65.60 (Construction), $11,000
Total: $19,863
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report
concurring in the Selection Committee's recommendation to hire MacLeod
Record as prime consultant for the Heather Downs Neighborhood Park
Master Plan, following determination that the City's standard consultant
selection procedures were followed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Community Services Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report
concurring in the Selection Committee's recommendation to hire Jongejan
Gerrard McNeal as prime consultant for the Cedar River Natural Zone
Master Plan, following determination that the City's standard consultant
selection procedures were followed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIITEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Community Services Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report
concurring in the Selection Committee's recommendation to hire EDAW, Inc.
as prime consultant for the City-wide Master Trails Plan, following
determination that the City's standard consultant selection procedures were
followed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. At Council's
request, a report reflecting total costs and funding accountability for the
aforementioned three master plans will be provided.
Councilman Stredicke expressed concern that developers are not being
required to participate in cost of City improvements i.e. roads, parks,
utilities, etc. impacted by large residential developments. Council President
Mathews advised that the subject of reinstatement of developer fees will be
discussed at the next AWC Legislative Committee meeting on Friday,
12/5/86, and a report will be made to Council at its next regular meeting.
On the subject of the public safety training complex, Councilman Stredicke
requested that both the Fire and Police Chief be present at the Council
meeting to respond to questions when the report is presented to Council by
the Mayor. Mayor Shinpoch concurred in the request and indicated that a
report regarding recent meeting with Kent officials would be transmitted to
members of the Public Safety Committee and Council in the near future.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes and Planning and Development
Committee Chairman Keolker presented a joint report regarding the
Leady/Parker request for extension of construction start date for the project.
The proposal, approved by the Hearing Examiner on 7/8/86, is for
development of 307 multifamily dwelling units on 65.9 acres of property
located on the north side of SE Royal Hills Drive at the 2800 block. The
Committees concurred in the recommendation of staff relating to timing of
construction start and phasing, and asks that an ordinance be drafted
formalizing the agreement for review by the Ways and Means Committee and
the Planning and Development Committee.
MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT AND WAYS AND MEANS COMMIITEE JOINT
REPORT ON THE LEADY/PARKER FPUD. CARRIED.
MEMOBA'NDUM
CITY OF RENTON
~, I f Vt-Rt:NTON
ueU 8 1986
NOTI CE OF PUBLI C ~ HEETI NG .. POUCy
DMlOPMFm "Fl"'.
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 15th
day of December , 19~, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington,
as the time and place for a public meeting to consider the ten percent (10\)
Notice of Intent petition to annex property to the city filed by the
Container Corporation of America. Property consists of 45.08 acres located
along the west side of Monster Road SW in the 600-1000 block; known as the
Container Corporation of America Annexation. Simultaneous zoning is
r~commended.for the property as M-P zoning.
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval,
disapproval ·or opinions on same.
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/5/86
CITY OF RENTON
"7· -'~) ,. p )7/,L.1i. ,-,. I I>-'~l~-, .. c.", f),,·
" ' .
Maxi ne E. Motor
City Clerk
· I
MEMORANDUM
\
OF
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY ,DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE, SO. RENTON, WASH, 98055
z
(") ~ ~ "b «-<c.
'9.q,. fO~ ~D SEPi<'\I'
BARBARA y, SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM • MAYOR
December I, 19B6
TO:
FROM:
Larry Springer
Steve Munson 6111
SUBJECT: Summary of Project Work for Week November 24 -November 26, 19B6
I) Container Corooration of America Annexation (6.5 hours)
On Monday I spoke with Vernon Umetsu of Tukwila Planning Department to see
whether or not he had written King County and Burlington Northern about annexing
the BN right-of-way to the easterly edge. Vernon indicated that he had written the
letter and that he would send our office a copy. I spoke with Bob Miulli of BN on
Wednesday the 26th about signing the 10% Notice of Intent petition for their Tract
1135 in the northerly portion of the proposal. He advised me that his office did not
handle that property and directed me to a Bob Nicholls In Seattle who does. Mr.
Nicholls wasn't in when I phoned so I left a message to be returned. On Wednesday
we sent to the Office of the City Clerk the agenda bill and maps for the 10%
petition setting December IS, 19B6, as the public meeting date. We advised that the
property be zoned M-P, and we will be getting a 75% annexation petition and·
environmental checklist from Container Corporation as soon as possible In order
that the 75% public hearing can be scheduled in a timely manner.
2) Covenant Church Annexation (6 hours)
I met on Monday, November 24th, with Bob Bergstrom, Mrs. Harders (owner of Tax
Lot 86), Mrs. Edlund (owner of Tax Lot 79), and her son Gerry Edlund about possible
inclusion of their properties in this proposed annexation. Mrs. Harders wanted
assurance that the hill above her place on Carr Road S.E. would be sanded in the
winter. Bob said that the City of Renton does its best to keep all roads maintaned
but could not guarantee her anything as requested. She and the Edlunds also had
some additional questions about who would provide water and sewer service and the
possible assessments for any L.I.D.'s in the vicinity. Gerry Edlund was also
concerned about the nature of his landscaping business -whether or not he could
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila washington 98188
(2061433-1800
Gary l. vanDusen, Mayor
Mr. Larry Springer, Director
Renton Policy Development Department
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
November 24, 1986
(;;, i Uf: RENTON
U~C t 1986
POUCV Df.VF.l OPMF.HT I)~",".
RE: Proposed Container Corporation Annexation.
Dear Mr. Springer,
The Tukwi 1 a City Admi ni strat i on has no object i on to the City of Renton
annexing the island of unincorporated King County located immediately east
of Fort Dent Park with the following exception: the western boundary of
the City of Renton's annexation should be the eastern edge of the Burling-
ton Northern Railroad right-of-way (see attached map).
Terminating the Renton annexation along the eastern railroad right-of-way
woul d a 11 ow the City of Tukwi 1 a to 1 ater annex th is area and cont.i nue the
smooth boundary our cities have just formed along this line to the imme-
diate north and south.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Vernon
Umetsu of my staff at 433-1858.
VU/sjn
attachment
cc: Robert Muilli,
Glacier Park Company'
(Burlington Northern RR)
Joe Nagel,
King County Planning and
Community Development Dept.
Brice Martin,
King County Boundary
Review Board
Sincerely,
~.
Mayor
i
/
/
/"" "-
I
-I / -
./
/
/.:"'" '0
..... > ....
--..-:---1:::: ------
\ ...: .-.
II /3 ....
?$ < "'--'
II
11.1 I::: w I.l A-
S ( .. 1(1(0 fl. --r £1)
AN N {.-" A-"iT' 0<-1'
tiM I r
/
/
!
, .
I
/
t' :,' SUBJECT: ~':. :.; Container Corporation of
;~~:...: ".:";:~'~,\-.'. ;-:;. " .' .:.
lP "'_'I l ..• ',: ,' .. ,,-' , America Annexation and
~:::'", ".,' '
r .},~, ''; .~ ••
:'" Rezone
.. -' , .~.
" ' i ";-': ~,-:".'
:J ,.',.' ", -.>. ~'~;'::' '" '.: .
~:~~7~~i,tll~~t~(~~g~ I De:c;:,., Maps ; Etc.)f\ttach
... ,
r>;;'. "·it:', , ,: L~tter ,"
(.:: : ::·~::_·'_;:'_..,-Ma_P:.-,-_______ ...;:...,-'----"-.:..
:(,};: ':,<~,;,~ ;~'-:---------,-----------t"" "' , ' t .. :'·, :., .,' \. , rF: COUNC I l ACTi ON RECOMMENDED: __ s..,:e..,:t_a_p:..ub_l_i_c_
~ .. '
.. r~. "'f' >{; -. -, '---:,---"'--:-":-;-~--'--,------,---.,---
, ,: .. J. '. ,',
.,i', FISCAL ' IMPACT: ~o-
1'.'.' .
':~' -: :'·r,TT-~.!·' .' ,
r ,',
.. ,~o,~ ,Ag e.n da, 0 f_~D:..:e:.;c:-:cm;::, ',::;' b::.;' e::;r:-·..:l~.:,.· '..::1.:.:9:.:8:.;6:..-' '_" ...;' ~' ~ i '. "
(Meeting Datel '; <,
Agenda Status:
, "
Consent
, ': l'
.f,U,b -' i~, Hea r i n9:-, _____ '""'" __
Correspondence ___ ~ _____ _
Ordinance/Resolution~~ __ ~
Old Bus i ne s s __ -=--'--:---'~,.;"...."
: .. : '
".' -,j.'
. :
New Business~ ________ ~~...;'~~_"~,.·~' .. ,
'. ,;~, '.: -.,' ';,;.~i.;'" .. Study Session
. Ot·her _________ -'-~,
Approva I:,
lega I Dept .. Yes,
,,;"
" I,"
No N/A .. ,',' --,
,_F.~~ance Dept .... Ve~ __ · No. ·:·.·N/A_._. ,"
Other Clearance, ________ ~ __ _
.' ,..' -:. ..~
, ..
" .......
, "
.. "
' ..
. ,
,o'i ..',., • '. .'
.. ", Expend i·ture Requ ired . $ . Amount Appropriation-
. Budgeted $ Transfer Requi red $ .~ ;:----..,--:-::-~---'----'--------------------'-.--.:.->~/~UMMARY"(Bac'k'grOund information. prior action and effect of implementation)
, . ",: (Attach' additiona'i pages if necessary.)
" . . L· • -, :. ,
'l·" .
/. _,The ~equested action is to ~et ,a pl.Jbl;q .. meet~ns f,?r .Decenbe~ ~S, 1986, to cC?n'std~r
",' " accepting the 10'1; Notice of Intent petition known as the Container Corporation, of ,.
:(i:::':,' .. ; Am.a"rica Anne>;ation"_ The pro.l?9~~d· aJ)~~xat~~n i; fo~ ~ ~15 ~ 08 ~~re~ ~o~at;~~ aiOt;g:.:tt:~
west side of Honster Road S. "!.: ,,;n the" ~OO-lOOO .bloc~. '
• 1
••• 1
.".1 '.""
.', '.
, .. " ' " . '-.
",
It''{PARTI,ES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CiTiZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
, , '
,','.
, :',
"t'·
THiS COpy FOR YOUR FiLES.
.. ,
, . "
".'
'.', .
.',,'
.',
I
I
THE CITY OF·RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055.
MAYOR
The Honorable Barbara V. Shinpoch. Mayor
Members of the Renton City Council
Renton. WA 98055
Re: Container Corporation of America Annexation
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
November 26. 1986
The requested action Is to set a public meeting for December 15. 1986. to consider
accepting the 10% Notice of Intent petition referred to as the Container Corporation of
America Annexation. The proposed annexation is for ± 45.08 acres located along the west
side of Monster Road S.W. in the 600 -1000 block. At the public meeting. the City is
required to answer the following questions:
I. Will the City accept the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an Indication of intent to
annex? The Policy Development Department recommends that the Council accept
the annexation petition.
2. Wlll the City require simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the property?
The Policy Development Department advises that the City require simultaneous
rezoning of the property and recommends that M-P zoning be imposed on the site.
3. Will the City require the property to assume its proportional share of the City's
bonded indebtedness? The Policy Development Department recommends that this
requirement be imposed.
If Council concurs in these recommendations and accepts the 10% petition. the Policy
Development Department recommends that Council authorize circulation of the 15%
Annexation Petition. then accept the 75% petition and set a public hearing date to
continue the process.
La M. Springer
Policy Development Director
LMS:5M:csb
Attachment
I
~ WIDE.. .wp
.... •.....•.
I
I
i
I
;!'-?:" ,
i
~~
I
,
.. ". ".-" ........ , .. .
~f=I' ---L ---.-.-------.-
':\f~:f'\T" 1
\
\
\
::'E._ ~ -__ '---ff,---____ -"-.;......:,._
'-""----..,;. ---,
\
\
\ \
E T R ? \~
-------l-----U--I '
AI L \0.
1\
I
w u
~
0/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I--
I
" ,
\
\
~ c-++--------t::;f>=~ 000::::::::::
"
MEMORANDUM
TO F~
qicho([s 40-3;)'s~
})irec-+orJ ~f.Ae AIt'24. f~t7rYl~jeV>1~ f
Bur hKj~ t-Jo-rfAerV\
1113 aJl4v@I1(J./L
S&-/ife, CUttsl,0~ tf8/0'l
MEMORANDUM .'
-+~ _______ DATE 1I/r1/l?b
MEMORANDUM
TO _~&",,=::;fe~ _________ DATE ~
City of Tukwila
6200 SOl.lthcenter Boulevard
Tukwila washington 98188
(206) 433-1800
Gary l. vanDusen, Mayor
Mr. Steve Munson
Renton Policy Development Dept.
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Container Corp. Annexation
Dear Steve:
November 14, 1986
CITY OF RENTON
NOV 19 1986
POUCY .
OevELOPMENT OEPT.
This letter shall serve to amend the Planning Department's letter of Novem-
ber 5, 1986.
Upon further investigation, the Planning Department feels that the proposed
annexation should extend only to the eastern edge of the Burlington North-
ern right-of-way. Stopping the annexation along this line would allow the
continuation of the smooth boundary our cities have just formed along the
eastern edge of the Burlington Northern right-of-way to the immediate north
and south (see attached map).
If you have any quest ions regardi ng thi smatter, please contact me at
433-1858.
VU/sjn
attachment
Sincerely,
L,((~
Vernon M. Umetsu
Associate Planner
, '
I
/
,,I
,;
I
... _------
/
,/ ,
/
/
"':
' ... :
Ii -: .. , '<.'.::
(V /<. i.,J I L.I'<
S 'v ffoR... -re'\J
AtJNI!X'A ,(ON
/
'/
"-"-
/
I
/
""'-
/
/
/
NEW C\c"f.. LIMlT
F IW ""-/t,1!J-l TO N'-.;;::
TU ~ W I I,.. '" '"
I?ou NDI\-(t... '(
A'1>:f u ,TM eN!
/
· I
MEMORANDUM '
DATE /I/;cJ./g~
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila washington 98188
(206) 433·1800
Gary l. vanDusen, Mayor
Mr. Steve Munson
Renton Policy Development Dept.
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Steve:
November 5, 1986
1,;11 i U~ Ht::NTON
I~OV 'I 1986
POLICY
DEVELOPMENT n~PT
The Ci ty of Tukwil a has no i mmedi ate plans to annex the "Quest i onab 1 e
Boundary Area" indicated on your map. While the City may wish to annex
this area in the future, current staffing constraints prohibit this
department from commi tti ng departmental resources to such an annexat i on
action at this time.
Please call me if I can be of help.
VU/sjn
Zilrd<--Vernon M. Umetsu
Associate Planner
433-1858
' .. /"
" I
1:-
I'"
!
.. UNION PACIFIC
UIlID RAILROAD
J. E, (JIM) MATZA
I'
I
AOOM 300 !
REAL ES"';ATI! AGENT 1418 DODGE STREET I' , ,
WEST~5'N REG10N OMAHA, NE 68179 C-~_'_E'_L __ E_ST_'_T_E_D_E_P_'_'_T_M_E_N_T _______________ '_'02 __ )_2_7_',_3_'_._4 ____ ~1
, )
. i i'
,!
E'
t,
..•. :.
" .
:., .. :: '.
" ','
... 0;
•• ~~~I'
!--" .. :.~
,
., . ".:;.:. " ".,
rho Gran", .. , CBICAOO. IIlLVAtn'.I&, ST. PAV'" .. tiD UCI~'1C ---I..... CO:lll''':~ •• "llcon81n oorporaUon, tor and la candiSe .... -
tlon or One Dolla .. ($1.00) and otha .... 1Qabl. COD.llleratlon to
l~ In h_n4 ~Ld, receipt Mbareot 1_ horeb, acknovledsad. COnY~J3
and qultcld •• to IlIla COUin e ."II.lftLGlpal oorporaUon DC the .
~
~t~~. ot Wa~lD8ton. Draat •• , .11 at the .. llbt, tlt1. and InLer-
•• t of ~~ •. Or~ntor In aDd \0 the tol1ov1ns d •• crlbed real •• tate
.l~.t.d In tbe C~t7 or liAS. S"'a or ~.ohLns~onl
Farcel A
A 'tract ot land In ~h. Southwut Qu..rte .. CSW't,
ot ~ctlon Th'pL~.n (1)). town.hlp ~ntJ-t~r~.
(2)) lortb. Rance Pour (bJ Ba,t. V."., belnt ,
portion or Traota !vent,-two (221, twent,-thr48
(23). ?vabt,-tour (24) and Tvoot,-flye A (25A'
Ln tbe nat or .AmOUOh "ddlUOh tl' s..tU .. ;
fract tv.ntJ-Dlna (29) In tha Plat or R~ntoo
ShOrelands 2nd Supl. _q4 .dJacent ~rcals • .ore
partloularlJ d •• crlbed .s fOllowsl
BeftllDlna .: tbe Southved COl"llleP or .dd :tecUon
::.~:;=:t!I~~:::~Ctn::;~1:~fb:!:::::0(81t~!4b"J
Bast ooa tbeN.and. two hundr.d sa ... antJ-ona and
.e ... antJ.raar hundradths (1.271.14) reet OD .ftd
_lana tha ~th line or •• ld 8ectlon Thlrteao (1)';
thanc. IIortb. cro ... lac CowltJ Road Jo. 24--2) ........ 1
(mow •• tb.e Monater Road) and. contlnulq co a
polDt OD tba ~darr 'at .. ao •• 14 tracts tvaatJ.·
elsht (28) aDd tvaatJ-Dloa (29). "'lcb la ,tha
trua polat or "Sle1as. ~aao. IOl'tb to a polot
ldanUtled bl ooordluta.a 1.176.611.00 and
a.l,6S1.4ZS. 9 or ~a va'hl~toQ St.te Laabert ar14 ooor4baau. Clortb ZoIM : thenca Iorth Dna
bundra4 .a ... aotJ·tl ... a (llS.OO taat \0 a polDt;
thano. V .. t t1lO hundred alpt:r and aLztJ-klna
bUD.41"a4th. (280.69) taat to a polD't; thaoc.
!!Ou.tb tltt711ne' "-P"'I'''' tift,·""'"' ainu.te.,
tOl't7-..... ao aaooD4a (S9·S).47~J ~.t three hundred
.a ... aDtJ·.a ... aa aad ttrtf-two baadredth. ()77.S2)
taat to a potat: thanoa SDutb ttttaaa da~ee.,
rort,-dx alaIta., tort7-one •• oODd. (lS'-46'U·)
.... t ODe buD4N4 el&btI·tav (184) tMt .,,. or
tau to a pout whlcb • 00 tha bouDdU7 11De
betweaa. ~oto tvaatJ11a. (29) aDd, !hlrtJ ()OJ;
theao .... tarlJ OD aDd alOQl th. eoutb boundarr
11Da or .atd ~ot ~atJ~a (29) &0 the ~a
polq. ot boclmllaa. . .
-----; ----:----.-
-----------
..
, ... ..1.(1.
...
. -<>:'.;~:J: .i ,.
. .. . ,." ".
,.
"peel 11
.• tract ur land in the 3ou.thvt \ ~..rtf'l' «SI' .. '
or Seotlon Thlrt •• n (Ill. Tnwn.hlp 'Vftnt7-thrp~
(21) IDl'th. Ranse '0~1' (~) ... t. V.H •• bftl~~
"al'tlon'l or Tracta rwentJ..-onf' Ut). 'J'vllntJ-hrc-.
rZZ} and Tw.nt7·thr~. eZl} 1n th~ plat or June-
tlon Addttlo~ to Seattl •• and Tr.ct. tv~nt,-"t.
(Zb, and TVent,-nlne (29' or RentDn ~or.l.nd~
lnd ~pl. and .dJ~~~nt pa~~ls ~ro n~l'tlr.ulllrl,
d.,ol'lbed a. tol1ov~1
A4s1n;lns .t tho Southwest corncr or ~lIld ~~r.tl~n
Thlrtll~n (ll'. thence SOUth elr~t,-~~Y~n d~~r~e.,
twntJ-dx "lnvte:\. rOl't,-elRht ~f'cC'nd. (07 lb':,'1',
~.t on~ thou.and. two hundrnd $.y~nt1-un~ lind
~""flntl-rour bund"fldthll (1.Z7l.7.,) r .. et un o.n,)
.long the ~outh 11n~ or ~,li ~ctl~n Thlrt~~n (Ill:
thene_ n"rth to tho ntI th Ml'£lo ,.r C.,unt7 R .... r!
10. Z~-Zl~-l {known •• the ftDn.tpl' ROld' at ar-
pro .. lr.".4to IIhUon h~«)O: tbt'ftC. ;:~I':h r.;:l'r,:;::'rr;"t.·:~:;
eMU hundr.d (ZOO) teet to • po1nt on the boun~4rJ
11n .. betve.n .. ld Tract 1V~ntl .. ~ln~ (.:!"t' ,nd rr"tt
1ventl-elght (l8). wh1ch 1s t~~ tru1 ~lnt or ~n ..
c1nn1ng; .
Th.ne .. ~lJntlnu.lnr. H::orth 4ppJ".,.1r.atlll1 two hW1'I'!".,~
nn, (.!50) r .. "t to., e po1nt Yblch 1. ~h" end or '
It. our.e, .nd _1.0 ldentlr~ .. d bJ V"~~llns:t.on 3t"t('
La.l'Ibert Or1d Coor·l1.n"tf'S tlf.,,.:.h l(\n~' ,. 17~"~~; .,\f'.
~ \."Sl.4~S.f.");
Th.n~e nn ~ t.~ .. nt eU~Ye to thll rtKht or r,1l~~
"l .. h"..lndl".d tV1Int7-I'eY"n and ror:'7-~l .. hUnc!r"dt'-1!1
(6Z7.4t.) reot. tc .. polnt on t~ .. bC"und"r"J Unll
b.tveen ... ld Tr"et. Tv~n~l-Rl" (!6)~nd tv"nt,-
s .... n (27';
Thenee eou.thvuterl, on .. nd dtlnr. the btl .. n'! .. ~·
line ,r .ald Trtcta rv.,ntl-~lt (~6) ~n1 T~~nt,
nine (2Y) to the true point or b~e1nnt"'"
A tr .. et oC lar.j 1n the 3Out~ve't ~"rt"r (3.~'
or SoIctbn Thirteen Il)}. T"",nshlp T\;~~.t7-';t"r.:'!
Ill' ,3rth. Rnnge P.~1..1 (i~) :Au. V.YO., t;~lns ~.,._
tlon~ or tnt. Tvent,-tour (~4) .~d Twentl-llvo ~
(lSA'. "'netlon Addldon to S.lIItLh; Tract T"~lIt~·_
nine (,~), Renton 9::oreland. c:nd 11;.1. "'nd IId:_.·
c.nt ""rce1. ot land .are ,.rtlculerlJ d •• erlb~d
•• rol10vR:
..
:'-
.. '
--~
• t',U!.
'!:nilY
. .. ~o r'Jr---.-: or-
.. ~h~
....
. ..
.¥
~.
\
""_'''' at 1M III eeI";-" ... "«.MII .. reel a ""ell .. f..,dIet , ... tlf'. " Cow ......... I".
656.65 ... I I, 650. '.1.110 of eN ."''''Oft I,a ••
• ....." Cr.tI Cowtl'.,,, , ...... I .... '.
~ .1 ......... ""'" I. ,... I,' .,.. W. to ... '''' .... ee''_ wltII ...... _1, ..... ,. of ea."" toed
-...... ., .... ("-.. &1M ............ ,.
..... _thee.terr, "-' .. 14 .. , • .,1, ..... ,. of
,,'4 CCIIMIty ... "' IN '.'.,teetIOlll of .. I. """'"
.... 1. wi ................ , of .. ,. "., 19.
1ttMce .... 1, _ ... a' ......... tfrl Itou .... " of •• 1411
fract 19 to ..... 1It ""$ h ............. " 11M of
uhf "'act It ... 'ract )0.
,
'..J. ~ W ~ -I. 150 W' ... w. '" '." _ ... I .... '0 ...
I.'i ~(I ;~~:·~,:~I~~lof-"'''':I .... _I __ I~::·;'''_--,-,,-,-I-ft-'-I-'5-0-)-'-.-,-,-.-.-,,-,~.:,:::~ "V" 1M'" port'_ eI ..... ~t Lot ,curt __ (, .. ). eM
". :
::. .~. (i" . .,
freel ~JurtlW .. en, a.tOft por ........ w .... I • .... "'~I Wt. ,Ai, 0' liiiiOl' '_rtMft (I",.
' ....... ,' ..... trtlw_ (I) "chI .... 'ClIff' ct., .. u.
V.It.. I .. ~ eN .... II .... , ,.141 a.cll_
'ourtMft " ~ ........
0' ........ 'r .. ..t 0lIl alt u.. ',lIowI ... 41er1cr1 ... If_,
",,_1l1li ... , 01 .. I. s.ctl_ '.,t_ ('\'. "-ce .. till tfrllrtr""'" .... , ... ..... cr', .... I.CH. forc.,... __ ..... ()7ou· .. r·' leu
thr .......... ttllrcy-f .. , .... _ hYftd,"'p U"'.OI' ,_C
Ie an'. 717.".)8 ", • ..,.., 'or .... , c:MIIMl of tM lau er_ II .. __ c.,.. ... ProJecc. ~.'" po'.c Is ... sc .......
'." VHfrI'"COlll Stat. lAI60rc Crllll caorlllllMtet ( .... ttl 1-.,
•• 16 ...... " I '.650.)51.1:" ... Is eM cr .. po'.c of
..... 1 .. .
......... Ii ~ to tile r'pc of r ... hll. fI.,. ....... , ...
.--trt-o ... ".er-' .......... U1I.'" ' .. r.
........ t ...... ot "".'" "' .. Sou'" ..... tr.'ou, ......... ',toea "_CH~ .... c .... HCOfIII. (,. 1)'1,,,,
.... c. tIIr ..... _ we 01 flft_ ." ... ..,. .'flUc •••
forty-s' ........ (ISOO7· ... ·' to IC;aU" Ut+SO.SI,
.'
·,t'·, .
I
I
t
i.··.··· i'
!
"
I.O.P.
-. -.-..... --
IPiII.'
.... v,
..... ,
-.~
"
I
"
--:~., .
, ,
Thenco South 81sht1-Dlne desr •••• tventr-on.
alnut ••• tlv ••• eond. (89·l1toS~) w..t thr ••
• nd •• 9.n\7-on. bgAdr.dth. (l.11) r •• t.to
St.tlon 1)1+$4.221
!h.nc. aD • ou~. to th. l.tt or r.4l~. three
hundred one .nd rltt,-.Lx hundrodth. (~1.S6)
t •• t throUCh an arc ot.tventJ-nln. d.lr •• ~.
twontr-.la .tnut ••• thr. ••• cond. (29 26'0)")
tu St.aUon 7Il1t09.141
!h.n~~ South tltt,-nlno de,re." t1t\7-tLve
~nuL'" two .ooond, IS9·S5'lZ~ We.t 'IYlntl
(10) t •• t .or. or 1 ••• ~ \be ... terl, ~rg1n
or the Jolntlr owned tract or lan4 .. ntloned
In thl rir.t ,.r'sraph. end bel", tbe Ind 0:
thla do.orlptLon.
II VITJ:.;s9 WElIEDP •. Ute O ... oto .. baa nOGuLod thi. In-
Ut .. tl .)
.' ,('~I ',.tt, ..... if.
5 • ......., !ilfc ot.1'J'
I. I.' ""IIItD
~ATE OF ILLIJOIS
Count, or Cook
...
CHICAOCI. "IL~'UK;:E. s·r. P'UL
.... D PACiPIC RAILROAD coru'An
~4.t
I. r. &MtoCMflU,
I 1969. b.Cure •• per-
IUd e,.i. 1PGTT11li1l
aDd .IU!!!t ~"'bn !~~~~'~:~i~:~~~~:: .,.,ou£.a th, VftbFn ana ,~." •• ,!,,~,. _aid In.tNlIIOnt to b. the
corporation. tor the 11 •••
tber.1n ".nUon.d. and OD oatb .tated tbat th., v ....
• ,d to ,xecute .,14 ID.t~nt .~ tbattb •••• 1 art1x.d l •
corporat. , •• 1 or the corporatlon •
II IIITI&SS VBBRs)P, t ha .. h .... unto Nt IIQ' ha.nd .nd
arClxad ar offlol.1 ••• 1 tb. ~ and reer flr.t .bov. wrlf.ten.
...... R.~_ 1Ir"Y".. '.' __ •
......... • ...... ~II .... ·._-'
...
T-".--~-.. _-:.-
'.';
';",
• • ...
.. '. ':"'-f'
( . ,
...... ,.-.. ..
r. _ .... ,... "
..... _.
r ..... c_ oJf u ....... ..,..n ... of o.Il:'qo, "IIv.--. It. , ... 1 ... 'ac'UIC'
...... " ... C .... "ft .... DIr~coJ". b.'o. I. I'C"""'~ of .11 cM ..... U ...
""0,-,,,,,, "f ."Id ....... "' ... C~ ... .,. _chon'U,. of ctar ''aUN lut ..
DI.c .. lC'c Cou .. c fo .. thr lO .. chrra DI.t .. lC'c or 111~1 ..... c .... DI.I.loa •
... Uleln", vh .... "' ......... ..., .. ..,.," ..... ..,. M".bJ COIVR ...
Ql'ITCU.l". irq h'c. U ... U .... of NI ..... U .. o .. c.paay'. " ... t lID .. t ....
• appl .... ' ... , tbento .... h_ aU otMI' ......... claIM ... ....,Ued
...... "" .... 110. 1 •• uto ~IE amwn •• _Ie"" cOl'pOl'a'loII .f , ....
Star. of Va"'I .. tDD, Cr_'H. "'JH' '0 .., ... U .... U_ ..
........... 1I .. "'relo."e .. N' fOl"lI. ,be (oUaw'" ~ ....... real _tate
,'. ',::,
• U.C'l of • .., .e 'M IV .,. of teetS-U.
1 ... 11., J1 .. til ....... 1M,. V.L. "'" a port._ .f T"act. J2. 2). Z' ... Z5rrA· h t'" 'la,
.f Juoc,,-..... tI_ 10 ""Ua, T,., It h 1M "a, of ... ,_ ~ ..... N ",'.-.... ,._, .... ce', ...... ,.nlc.l.erl, "' .. IW -.. -follow I
....... &-. at i ... IV, COI'MI' ., .. W Iact'" 11;
,~. to-tll .,·Z.· ... leat 1.Z71." feet .. ... a.-. eM __ II U ....... llactloa 11, , .... .
Iktrlll. c ....... c:-" ...... J"""""'.
C ...... ,.e .... t ... 1oaII' ... caa& ...... &0 a
...... _ 1M ~ Mew. .... b-Ca 2' ..
H. _'ell .. &-. In. .... , ., ..... _. , ......
10 .. ,. Ie a,. .. "-tt, ... .,. ~ ... , ..
•• 1".,71.00 ... 1.1,15'.411 ... ., .......... t_
Itate a.-IIrert ........... , .... CIIM'D Z-h
,-.-.. 8MO lJ ... , ... Ie .............. , JIG." '..a ............... a-r.. Jl'U'.r .... , ,".S! '...e: Ie ....... u-ce .... U· .. ·41-
... , ." , ... -.n _ ... M a ..... _an ..
_ 1M ......., ... '-'-'l'l'ac&. " .. JO •
• --.. 17 .... _ "'" -' ~ . 1 .. ., .... 1'hc't " .. de, I ....... .,
..... 1 .. .
, :~.:,' ._--.... _----
, ".
( .. ,
. :
.. 'r.ct .~f .......... IW lI. of Ift""'-U.
f--.-tll, .: J .......... ....,. '" f ..... W ..... """
~,.~ 01 t .. ~ •• ':1, 11 ... :J '0 ... "a' _I
JuwU.-..,'''_ I .............. 11' ..... 1 •....
1. ,,' ... , .. Ibor ...... 2'" hpl .... "J.'"
.... t.l ••• ~. par'lr.I .... , 4#.cr'''' .. '.I'ow.l
""-.'" .t .... III CarM" of .... 4 .. tao. U;
.~. ao. ••• '·1.· .. -Ea.t 1.271.74 f .. 1 .. .ad
............ , .. U ... f .. id heUoa U, cbnlc'.
lion. to U .. 801'tb .rlla .f c-I, .... 10. l'-
':1-4-1 (bow. .. , ........ 'tH &0.1) at .ppr ..... '. 1,.,,_ 40+00, .~. Aort' .ppro.~ •• l, ZOO
I_I 10 • po'a, .. U .. bouDd.I,ry It .... ___
... 4 Tnet Zt ad t ... e ZI. vblc" I. II .. trae
PO'.t of ... , .. , ... .
nw.c. coaU ..... IorUr, 0,,1'0.1-.'.1, no , .. ,
to .. polDt "'k" I. cI .. eDd 01 • run. ..... 1_
,.,,'1"" ., wa."I .. toa Ila'e La.berl Crt.
Cdo .. 4'.-t .. (Ior.b Zooe) • 176 •• :1.00 I 1.'Sl.42S.69;
~c. _ ........ cur.. to the ... ,bt of .... 'u • • n." 'H', to. ,.Iot OIl Itt. """1'7 U_
he ......... rneu"'" ZI;
n.... .............. " _ .... a'-, tbe ~ .. ,
I'M 0' .... Trecl. " aDd 2t &0 ,be In. pola, ., ... -... .
'.reo.' ,
A tract ., &aiM .. u.. IV 114 ., lee, ... n. , ........ u .... " ..... , Id,. V ....... _
.... " ... ., LeN Z' .. ZSA ..... U ... ""Uo.
'0 "',U., irK' H. ""o. .hIM ...... z.. ",1 •
... "J..:.' ,.reel •• f .... .ore pa-Ucw.t.l, 4ftcra ...... 1.11__ .
......... • 1 &lie ., conn' .f ...... .........
'ueel A _1ft .. r.n ......... U, ... ., CooN ... , ..
• 17 ••• 56 • ., ...... 'JO,lll.60 of n. .......... '_ "a, • ...-.en crt' CooN ... , .. nr-Ia. 10M).
,...".. •• to.i ........... "" ... ,a. "-U'l"_'
10 ....... eec, ... ri'a. ,M ... ,erl, ....... f
~ ....... Z4-ZJ-4-1 c---. _ lillie "',er -I.
n..c. ...... '.d' ......... Mdera, .......
• , NW eo-c., ... '0 ,be "'er.-,&o. of .. W ""_" ........ a,' , .. __ It ~ ••.. 14
tr.cC It.
n..e. __ .1, _ ... 1 ... , ........... .....,
., .... 'beet. " Ie ..... , "'m .. _ t"
......, .... ., .. 14 beet zt .. b., JD.
,..... 8wdI .,-,."'-..... 16 'eet, ... _
1_ ........... ., ... '_.
-.
" .. ," .-.,.-
,.
\
N
(5
co
.1.
'."C'rl D
A ~'.I. _f .... l~ 'H' 'a .l.l~ ...... ~'I~
of c:..w~t w, I' .. Tr_t JJ .............. .
: ..... 1. ,. ,_ 1& 1/4 .. s.c-U. 14, r ....... p :J
.."..h .................. 1,111& k,...-a ,_
... , II ... , .. U hcta-.4 .... UKI .f ....
J_'ac I,. ..,... .,. I" O. V. I. I •• "w. Co. Iy •
... C. R. IT. Po , r •. L I ....... t .. n 'H'
...... UIM'" :w. ., u .. ,.n." ...... ClJIN4 llMI
.... ' ... Ina a' Uw • ronn' .f ... 4 ~tl_ 14;
thea<_ Iorl' ,7'Z'·,,. .... J14.01 , ... '0
luU:_ 7)7 .... )I.f • .....,.,.._ •• ' .. 1 c ........ of
', ... Ea.. C ... · ... .-.. Ii'·.·' ......... "ejM' ""'e'h
. pol.tn'i -."'"iiilW .,. ..... 'DCt. I'a, ........ n
Crt. Coord I .. ,.. va-r,' &.a.) • ')',441."
I 1 •• so.ue.U. at .. ,_ In. po'a. o' ""IIII'ac.
1beec .. Oct .. nne t. dw .... pt of rM'u SU." 'H', ' .... nl .... i'"I .. at ... ,u'" be'ea Iouth
l'·'J"'· veal, 'hro.lb .. arc of ,"01'.,-to
S'aUoa n .. ".,.511
TheDe .. Sou,h "·Zl·~· ~t ).71 'H' to I,.,loa
11 ... ".22;
t'MM'. _ .. attw to tM 'd. of ''''ua lOt.S'
, .. t. lUcNP _ .rc ., Jt'Z"or t. I,., ...
761+09.'4;
n.oc. s-t. "'n'oz-.... ' '0 'eet, .on .r
I ... to tM .. ,aI, .rata .1 p. Jotatl, ....
tract .1 I __ U ......... Itn' .......... .
........ , ....... , ......... a,c .. .
lIceuee ... ,.nIU ........ ., ... ., neon, .. Ie all .... U_
. ')-!j ... ".....".,'-............
18 vtnIII waaar. ,.&8 ~t--' ......... ., t.... JA~~~~)",) ~'"
!
;
!
I
--
' ..
::
•
. :
:'
<---~
' .
.-. A.., ... foI<I U..L.UIIO.:.. ;
') :..:..
Oa ...... _______________ ..... ..,(,oN .... W, •
.. n.roMiC'.6.~" • ~.t ,..1", IA ....a. tOK' a&W ~ --~""II.~.
~C'aoaaUo)t .. ~ &IQ&AID ~. OGIL~. CQ eo ...... C8 Do UW
..... c. .. ~ ......... ~ a.a aM w.. o· C tOc' u.. ~ ........... n-c..u ..
.IA4 ~~ ~ -.0 .autisM ca:.o I<MO .. Ia.I.a W, ee.,,. ~II. ... \<01
, I 'I .,
"
.t
, .. . "
, .
/'
-,
Metro
STEWART TITLE COMPANY
OF WASHINGTON, INC.
801 Second Avenue
Norton Building, Suite 600
Seattle, Washington 98104
Title Officer, Toni McGregor
Title Examiner, Mike Sharkey
Unit No. 8
622-1040
Exchange Building Order No.: 16365
821 2nd Avenue
Seattle, Washington
Attention: Susan M. Solberg
A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE A
Effective Date: June 28, 1985, at 8:00 a.m.
1. Policy or Policies to be issued:
ALTA Owner's Policy Form B 1970
(Amended 10-17-70)
Standard (X) Extended ( )
Proposed Insured:
TO BE DISCLOSED
Amount
Tax
PREMIUM
TO BE AGREED UPON
2. The estate or inter,est in the land described herein and which is
covered by this commitment is fee simple.
3. The estate or interest'referred to herein is at Date of Commitment
vested in:
OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY, an Oregon'
corporation '"
4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of
King, state' of Washington, and described as, follows: _'
As on Schedule '-A; page :2, attached"
"
::
, '
·.i
"
.'
A.L.T.A COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE A
Page 2
Order No. 16365
The land referred to in thi~ commitment is situated in the county of
King, state of Washington, and described as follows:
PARCEL A:
Tract 33, Second Supplemental 'Maps of Renton Shore Lands as shown on
the official maps thereof on file in the office of the Commissioner
of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington.
PARCEL B:
That portion of Government Lot 14, southeast quarter of Section 14,
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,
lying southerly of Second Supplemental Maps of Renton Shore Lands
and easterly of that certain right-of-way conveyed to Chicago,
Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co., by deed recorded under Recording
Number 453947.
END OF SCHEDULE A
" ", "
--~--.--------..,-.~ --"
, .
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY
A.L.T.A. COMMI'llIENT
Schedule B
I. The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Order No. 16365
-,
A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly
executed, delivered and duly filed for record.
B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration
for the estate or interest to be insured.
II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will
contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first
appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof
but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or
interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record.
3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be
disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or
hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens
under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records.
5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons,
corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the
shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond
the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States
Government.
6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or eXceptions in patents, or' in Acts
authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.
7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for
sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. '
'j 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and
,special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien.
'j C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, page 2, attached.
i ", ..
-. .. ", .,.,
1
I I' -,
1 ,
i '.
I
.,
i
! :: ,
..
A.L.T.A COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B
Page 2
Order No. 16365
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
1. Exceptions and Reservations contained in deed from the state of
Washington, whereby the Grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases,
coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the rfght of entry for .
opening, developing and working the same and providing that such
rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full
payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry; recorded
under Recording Number 5780049.
AFFECTS: Parcel A
Right of state of Washington or its successors, subject to payment
of compensation therefor, to acquire rights of way for private
railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other
easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and
other products from this and other property, as reserved in deed
referred to above.
AFFECTS: Parcel A
2. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
3.
BY AND BETWEEN:
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
REGARDING:
AFFECTS:
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
Pacific Railroad Company, a Wisconsin
Corporation' and Harold R. Iverson and
Marion E. Iverson, husband and wife
January 12,1966
February 18, 1966
5990556
Use a private road under the
railroad's tracks and across the
right of way
Parcel B
EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER: .
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
Pacific Railroad Com~any and King
County, Washington a ""unicipal '
corporation
Channel restoration
Parcel B as constructed
March 25, 1980
April 15, 1980
8004150481
(continued)
. '-" i ,',
..
,
.'.
"
.'
'.
4.
A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B
Page 3
Order No. 16365,
EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, a corporation of
State of Oregon, ,and Oregon and Washington Railroad Company, a'
similar corporation and the Town of Tukwila, a municipal corporation
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
Water pipeline
As constructed
November 1, 1928
October 29, 1930
3638934
5 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND COND I T IONS THEREOF:
BY AND BETWEEN:
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, a corporation of
State of Oregon, and Oregon and Washington Railroad Company, a
similar corporation and the Town of Tukwila, a municipal corporation
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
REGARDING:
September 3, 1929
October 29, 1930
3638935
Installation of water pipeline
6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
7.
BY,AND BETWEEN:
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, an Oregon
corporation, and its lessee, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah
Corporation and Water District No. 35, King County, Washington
DATED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
REGARDING:
April 9, 1975
August 19, 1975
7508190669
Pipeline
Payment' of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required.
The propert'y described herein is situated within the boundaries of
lo~al taxing authority of'city of Tukwila.
Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is
1.07%. '
,'" -. , (continued)
,: '.
j
I
I
, j.'
••
.' ' "
",". ~
".,.' ..
. ~ .. ',";:;!!Ii!!!Ii!i!iii!lili!j!i!!!!i!Ii!li!li!!!!iiillll!~~]~"';"';'C
.' , .....
',. .. ,. ' .
.... : .• ;
' .. -
. -",
"
i~
0; ."
,00
::IJJ
~. > -z ::r ...
. !. :.:.
CD ::r a; iii'
::I -.
0"
CD ::I
AS!. .. .,
~~ CD .,
cn~ .,-
::ICIJ 'a. c
o ~
S:~
CD'
~=
iO-::I co
~c
z3 0..-
=::r ., CI)
.,.0.
~. = m . -< en . .,
. ,
" .'
"
( ,
8.
A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B
Page 5
"
"
GENERAL TAXES ON OPERATING PROPERTY OF THE TAXPAYER; INCLUDING THIS '~
AND OTHER PROPERTY:
AMOUNTL
TAXPAYER:
TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER:
AFFECTS:
Available from the state of
Washington in Olympia
Oregon-Washington Railroad &
Navigation Company
142304-9008-06
Parcel B
9. GENERAL TAXES ON OPERATING PROPERTY OF THE TAXPAYER, INCLUDING THIS
AND OTHER PROPERTY:
AMOUNT:
TAXPAYER:
TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER:
AFFECTS:
Available from the st'ate of
Washington in Olympia
Oregon-Washington Railroad &
Navigation Company
722950-0330-00
Parcel A
10. Unrecorded permits, licenses, leases and/or easements for private
'and public crossings and for various utility purposes as disclosed
by off record information.
11.
12.
Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of
security interests on personal property installed upon said property
and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of
the term. " , '
' .. ' .
Right, title and interest of King County as disclosed by quit claim
deed recorded January 21, 1981 under Recording Number 8101210477,
(said qui t' c~,aim :deed is a connection.::!)Cone recorded.'January 12,
1970 under 'Recording Number 6607786;.): i,The legal 'description as set c'", ,
fo'rth 'therein ',is not 'suffic1"entfor:pr6pe'r location:/':'>:;' , "" ,
,.t •• :,," •
, ,.,,~ . '. ..:;, .. .;. ~~i.~.~.~;,~~.f .::-.~ . ,.
" ...... _. -' ... ~ .. ~,..-~, , .. ~ .. ,-. .. ~ .
-, . . ""~'-' ;.,--", ,-
• ~:,,>{g" . -~ . END OF SCHEDULE B
.. ' ; ." ~' .. ' .
, ' . . '.' .:',:,:,: :.. :.
_ .. " .; .. ~ ....
. '\' '" ' . " . ; ' .. -.;: '.'--'. " .
> ':-.'
"MS/cb/709~c " . ,:'
;, . , .
, i; ._,.:._ . .
OF
.J, )
f...
~~~
'6 -~ 10'
1,-2 ~~ '1l'~o SEP"'~~'Ii
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
October 28, 1986
Robert Miulli
·
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055,
Senior Director, Portfolio Development
Glacier Park Company
1011 western Avenue
Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98104
Oear Mr. Miulli:
The City of Renton Policy Development Department has received an annexation
application from the Container Corporation of America for properties located
,along the west side of Monster Road S.W. (see attached map). Included in this
proposal is a portion of a parcel owned by your firm (Tract 35 of Renton
Shoreland, 2nd Sup!.) in the S.E. 1/4 of' 14-23-4.· We are taking this
opportunity to notify your office of this in order that we may receive any
comments that you may have and l~J you sign the 10'l6 Notice of Intent petition
(attached) if you desire. We 'would appreciate your response as soon as
possible.
Very truly yours,
Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:cb:2208G
OF
z § ~ ~. "b~ ~~
"'1-EO SEP""l\:."'~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
october 23, 1986
Property Manager
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
OW Railroad and Navigation Company
c/o Union Pacific Railroad Corporation
P.O. Box 2500
Broomfield, CO 80020
To the Property Manager:
The City of Renton Policy Development Department has received an annexation
application from the Container Corporation of America for properties located
along the west side of Monster Road S.W. (see attached map). Included in this
proposal are portions of two parcels owned by your firm (Tracts 33 and 34 of
Renton Shorelands, 2nd Supl.) in the S.E. 1/4 of 14-23-4 and the S.W. 1/4 of
13-23-4. We are taking this opportunity to notify your office of this in
order that we may receive any comments that you may have and let you sign the
10% Notice of Intent petition (attached) if you desire. We would appreciate
your response as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:cb:2209G
OF Re""
f....~ ,). o ~ ~~: f, _ & o .
~ .,.
"0'9. r.,'l-
"'''Eo SEP"E."'~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
october 23, 1986
Chris Loutsis, Manager
Real Property Division
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055.
500 King County Administration Building
Seattle, WA 98104
Dear Mr. Loutsis:
The City of Renton Policy Development Department has received an annexation
application from the Container Corporation of America for properties located
along the west side of Monster Road S.W. (see attached map). Included in this
proposal is a parcel owned by King county (Tract (180 in the S.W. 1/4 of
13-23-04). We are taking this opportunity to notify your office of this in
order that we may receive any comments that you may have and let you sign the
10% Notice of Intent petition (attached) if you desire. We would appreciate
your response as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:cb:2207G
Attachments
"
OF R~A.
~ ·V.,
~ .'" o
C; ~1r~ z -... -"f, _ &
~ "'. "'b~ &,q.
"'1-Eo SEP't~"'~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
'.
Rick Beeler, Planning Director
City of Tukwila
6800 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 9BI88
Dear Rick:
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055,
October 20, 1986
The City of Renton has received an annexation application (Container Corporation) in the
vicinity of the recently negotiated Renton-Tukwila Boundary Adjustment as outlined on
the attached map. These facts are involved:
I) The application proposes a boundary consistent with the easterly right-ot-way line
of the Burlington Northern railroad as provided tor in the boundary adjustment.
2) Doubt has existed for several years as to the factual location of your city boundary
in this area.
3) As shown on the map, our Public Works Department has drawn what it concludes is
the actual City of Tukwila boundary based upon the legal description written for the
proposed annexation.
4) If the annexation proceeds as submitted, it would continue the existing
unincorporated island situation in the area and perhaps result in extensive review by
the King County Boundary Review Board.
Your city may consider these options:
I) Are you interested in annexing all or a portion of the rights-of-way involved?
2) ,Do you have any other suggestions?
I
We would appreciate your comments on this situation soon as we are attempting to move
this annexation along in the process.
Sincerely,
~~
Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:2193G:wr
Attachment
---.--------_ ... _----_ ... _----------------_._-----------_." ----_.---"._-----------
(
, .
SPEED LETTER
TO: 5:-ff2..0L-;Y{ , . DATE :._-=c;,~/-,-/...:::.C.l-(--"-~~ ____ _
SUBJECT: ?f:y../ £h-c-.
PROJECT :-..l..Cd:a7+..<:!.!.(~=-':::::::~'-::. ;:·~re:::......--
~~
(Si gnedf'" .
E X H I BIT "A"
CONTAINER CORP.
Legal Description
All that portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13;
And of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23;
And of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24;
All in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly Right-of-Way Line of
Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as Steele Hill Road -Survey 24-23-4-1,
Established 5-23-31, or County Rd. No.8) with the northerly Right-of-Way Line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Belt Line Right-of-Way in said Section 24;
Thence northwesterly along said railroad Right-of-Way Line, being also the
existing City Limit of Renton as annexed by Ordinances No. 1764 and No. 1928, a
distance of 280 feet more or less to a point on a line which bears 90· north-
easterly from the northeasterly existing City Limit Line of Tukwila as annexed
under Ordinance No. 252;
Thence southwesterly along said line to the southwesterly Right-of-Way
Line of the former Northern Pacific Railway being also the existing City Limit
line of Tukwila;
Thence northwesterly along said southwesterly Right-of-Way Line through
the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 through the Northeast Quarter of said
Section 23 and through the SE 1/4 of Section 14 to the thread of the Black
River and the existing limits of the City of Tukwila;
Thence northeasterly along said thread and said City limits line to
southerly Right-of-Way line of Monster Road S.W. (formerly known as So. 153rd
st.), being also the existing City Limit of Renton as annexed under Ordinances
No. 1764 and No. 1928;
EXHIBIT "A"
Container Corp.
Page 2
~.
Thence easterly and southeasterly along said southerly Right-of-Way Line
of Monster Road S.W. to the south line of said Section 13;
Thence southerly along the West Right-of-Way Line of said Monster Road
S.W. in the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 to the point of beginning.
6-13-86
Fl.ll
I I r
:~'!.~
i r
0
1 I
• I I
~ I I r
1 I
> 1 1
'j 1 I
1-
J
~ 1 1 r 1
"_ _ _ CHICKID
.,.,."OVID ----==-=-_._-=--.. --...
,) ~ ~1"7 ~
-, "
'ILl: NO.
'IB.D .00 "--"".L-
eM .. :1' ~O, __
I
----
, .
M E
I 5 P
CITY OF RENTON
D~~A~TMKNT O~ ~UBL1C WOftKa .
.. COUTAlIJEf2 COI<P. Of AMS21CA
ANtJEXAfIOfJ
~
n " " " " Q II
" ~ " t..» Ii
fq " " ii -u 0 11
::D Z li
H iT! 11
Z H
-t 0 'I
~ H ","
-< -i I'
I "' H il
;.--! 0 I!
Vl Z II
" " v:: li n i!
71 Ii
ri Ii
;i z n
:1
A" il
!!
'.' g
;::; " " H " " Z !i
-i Ii
" " v " " i!
!i g
" " ~1 I' "' n
!Tl II
" " ::: Ii
:D n
D H :::: " IT! !!
;Z; n
-< it -< !!
i!
Q ii
i; :5 Ii
;!j II
D fi
' .. ' il
-l " " m " " ~ Ii '-"
H if
t..""l ii
-i ji
~.; Ii
'"""' ji
(." i!
il
,-, Ii g
-i; ii
H
-~'. ii
(;; g
n
v ii ij
Ii
" " 11
t_·~ ii
iT! 11
fT! " "
""D H
7.i ii
" 9 ii
ri1 Ii
ii ;ry il
-! ii
~; n
" I H
~ " " , "" !i ,
.0"
,j " " "T,
~, tl
-< II n , ..... " "
'"!j II '1
~ " (0 ~ :
V H
Ii
!!
:1
11
C " " ;:;:: :: " 11
ii
ii
" " '" f'11
Z ii
b "
" " ,". i! n
T! ii
'1 ::
" t<, it
.'> j'
g
v :: ::
H
(:>
h .. ~
~
r-
rn
i:0
X: r--1.""
Pi c: r-z _.;
-i "C'
o (oi, rii.
;;;=: t· ... ' ~,~
G
..,.~ .......
H
Ci
Z
i)
r~ :1> z ::-:..~ r(,
C' r-n :--:
t·'~ f;
c;::: '-; ~-r
J> --;
o
~: Z
1>
::;::
-<
.......
... .:.. ;r C""i
rr: ,': .. G r~ 9.
.".' -: C, ......::
~J~~
;:: ~i :~ ~;
fi"1 ;J:.'
t·-'l ::;:; ;-----{
:',--'P13. -< ::;-", fi"
;,.~ ::D. Z n I: r--i .-, :;:.1
-_.!;;::. t:::: C
7' Pi '1
-"'. ~~.~ ~~; :> ).:.' ~<; 7~ t-::
:-."; :"~
c
: ....
c~
0'"
'-tt
J)
-_. "T'
(:", ::.~
6·· X·
". ;-,.;
r·.J --'. u"! --'.
'-.... :.:s' 0:' ,.,-
(r·. ".:.: ,
;;
... ::= ;,~,: ;,~, :-'-,
--: ::;~ :: ... : ... , i!
.:::.
0"1.'
'-'
'._'
'.'
:j
-;.j
-(
_.j
.t:
:i
i'
ii
"
·il
" " li
ji
;i
::
i!
g
::
::
" "
jj
:: ::
ij
1:
" ::
" !!
it
.. n
" " H
H
11
lj
" ::
'j
Ii
H'
CI
",-
iii
C: ;:"'~
::;: o
T; Z:
....... . ..• ~
i _.j
HfTl o;:::r
.-. ':.-
(!) 'l:i
z~ ~
kl .......
1...:: ~.
"'" ,~
(:::: CG => :2;
i
r .... ~
~
n " ~ li
'-'
11 c t.-:: ii
IT" 11
:j 0 11 :::;:; Z ;i
I-' f!1 ! ~
Z ::
-i 0 ii ·n ii
-i ~ H
I H i!
H 0 H
~ z "
li
t."l ::
G ;f
7.l ,i
" n ii [J !1
""-Ii
.... \l
T: H
:::Q n H
~ n
;;
v li n
!i
1i
!1
f,,} ;1
IT'; n !Tl
::
" -n " ;i)
:,
" 0 il
T:
!! ~
,",' ,.
~~.! n
-< rr
II
~~~ ii
" " :; ::
:::D lj D
"' H ' .. '
--i i',
1' ... ,
!! :'1 ;ry
h " " ~,,,: ,.
:,
--; il !-: li
C! \!
t.O jl
g
~ .. 1i
"'!] il
T: li
~. ::
U1 Ii
i1
V H
ij r:
Vl !i
fTl !i
rr; Ii
l!. -;:; " Ai n ,.-: ii '.--t;.\ ;:
.in
::::) n
-i " ;' -< ::
::
:r: 11
~.-! " " t., ;:
-i ii
0 11
?:! " :: -< g
n . "~ " " ji
" il
'1 !!
~ " " ill :;
...... 1I
11
ii
" 0 11
~ " • r.' " !i
\!
" ::
::
" rl !i
Z ,.
~ 11 v
!i
~ H
'=' ii
T! " " t·,.: !\
.l> g
:1
v-;;
11
()
•
r',)
H
t·.J J>
Z ttl :;1 err-iT: ,-.,.
,'.' rq z
iT! v!; z:.r:
~o ;:;:; c: Fi -'1 r-
'C'. ..:."
f'" :Z' rn C1
:;"f ~ "j
J:.'"
\' t<!
;~
t:::' t:::i
r1
~.~ ~ ... ~
DC
;!} -:::
!-; r-
.,=?'
o
;: ... ,
o
~-.
r,-,
:-.
fT~
J)
/".
~.-;
"'='0 ;1) :z
Hi'!
7 ~O ::::
.",
T: "T; ., .. ~'.
;/1
iii
!'Tl
-n ii
0
"'=' f!1 ;;:;
-< -<
I
H
~-.~
.-.;
f-:
~
",.. ...
-(
~""
:.:
T;
~
m
v
0
~ , ....
rr;
Z r' "
,.,
:]
::
k'1 .::.
v
~-"
0
0',
r"
1'1
::0 ;;] I l~
Pi Ci r-
Z--!
--1 ~
c) C •. ; f,~
Z .. i~· v'
c z
r·,· I>
;; ~ I~~ ...... I •..
~
::,..-~ c::
C;:.:.
~e -"
l'
!-~i f'"
-0
:.1"
r/~ ;';:i ! --{
I -: r~: ::;: .< ~-: r,;
(~ S f2 ~:~
-;;;::;t::!O
;;) f=! -1'1
fn t. .. ~
->. v:; c:: J>
..:;. ~~~ Ai ~ .. ~
H ~.,'1
• .. ·1 -e r:;
£: tt' -,~ ~.'1
Z1'H;:''-:,
.' :I~ 0 :;:
C:' Z Pi ." -.-. ".' "'. .,.:..:
f.hl -i
?t ~~~ '"! n ..••.
'0
..,,,::,.
,.",
;) ~
HfTl
Z
-1 ~
-{ ~
I:-i
H :-~
t.,~ Z .
......
-~
'0'
~ , ....
-~ -<
v
-::
0
~ ,".'
fT1
L
>< .......
.. "'.
..,.,
r .. ;:
"'" './
=*: -~.
:;:
8=
c.,;
!j r
7:.
-I
-~
.-"
..,~ --,
ci
7.::
fT1 J) r: ~~ c:; ~::!
~t::':!:;iC
.' :D :-,.: "
;-" t
-> -~.:; CJ :L;'
1.:. ~"~ :::r:: :"~
j--., '-""
~., :!
-,",
.-".
" .• h
''''':'
b '-' "l'~ ..
f'1
:{>
':::) -:'
.i~ '"" -r ,
;.J ". i-'~
~; l-.':, .~'.
i ; " .' <:> ". ::~::
<:> (C' ,.,-.
0 ;:~. '2 .
;:.",
June 25, 1986
Mr. Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. So.
Renton WA 98055
Dear Mr. Munson:
(r-
.'"""
RUTHE RIDDER
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR
708 King County Administration Building
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle. Washington 98t04-2384
(206) 344-7304
crl '( vI' tlENTON
JUN ~ti 1::100
POLICY
OO!E/,I)PMENT O!:r-!'.
Your letter of last March to Dave Clark (copy attached) was
recently referred to this office.
Attached are the legals for the properties concerned.
Very truly yours,
Ruthe Ridder
King County Assessor
k_hcC~
rJ}v. McCabe ~s~ssments Information Supervisor
JMc/ab
Enclosures
\
FORM 11S
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. ECF-0l9-86 CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
PROPOSED ACTION APPI rCATION TO ANNEX APPROXIMATEI Y 42 ACRES
AND TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO M-P (FILE R-021-86
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS _____ _
PROPERTY LOC!lJEDON T~E WESTSIDE OF MONSTER ROAD S. W. A.T T~E .
600 -1100 gLOCK.
POSTED TO NOTBFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITV OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE lE.R.C.l HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
OOOES [X]OCES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ION THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENViRONMENTAIL IMPACT STATEMENT
DWDLL CXJWILL NOT
BE REGUBRED.
THI!! CITY DF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FDR 113 DAYS FROM THE DATII!I BE Law.
COMMENTS MUST. DBIEI RECEIVEO 1liiY APR I I 14, 198F
•
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 6:00 P.M., APRIL ll1, 1926 •
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
BUIILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
236-2660
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
wn'UT PROPER AUTHORlZAll0N
· "
1079N
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINA TION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-OI9-86
APPLICA TION NO{s).: R-021-86
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to annex approximately 42 acres and
to rezone property from G-l to M-P.
PROPONENT: . Container Corp. of America
LOCA TION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the west side of Monster
Road S.W. at the 600-1100 block.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43.21C.0:50(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055
Phone: 235-2550
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no
later than April 14. 1986.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton.
Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
DA TE OF DECISION: March 26. 1986
PUBLICATION DATE: March 31.1986
~~ /
/'/," -----~
~OnciG:Nelson
BUilding and ZOning Director
-, . " .". ,,.. , ... , ......... ,. , ... , •• ' .• ,~~_._ ,,~_,_ •. ~'. ,,"'._'= ··~d .. ·"_. _' .• ,' ,_~~ ____ " , •.••.. , ..•.••. _...,.'-.'~'''''''''-~ -.,_',"" ",,-__ r-. -'",-" ...... " • ...,,,_,,"".~ _.~_.'~_" ,.,"
. "
I077N
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINA TION
ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON. WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has Issued a declaration of non-significance
for the following project:
CONTAINER CORP. OF AMERICA (ECF-019-86)
Application to annex approximately 42 acres and to rezone property from
G-l to M-P (file R-02l-86): property located on the west side of Monster
Road S.W. at the 600-1100 block.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance
for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under
their authority of Section 4-2822(0) of the Renton Municipal Code:
THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP. LTD. (ECF -014-86)
Application to rezone 15.44 acres from H-I to B-1 to allow future "III Renton
Place" office· blJilding and zoning compliance with II Renton Place (file
R-016-86): property located at southwest corner of South Grady Way and
Talbot Road South.
Further Information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning
Department. Municipal Building. Renton. Washington. 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC
action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by April 14. 1986.
Published: March 31. 1986
•
OF
z ~ ~ -". ;a
0'9. ~~
'11"1;0 SEP1E"'~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
March 24, 1986
Dave Clark
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
King County Department of Public Works
Division of Hydraulics
900 King County Administration Building
Fourth and James
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Mr. Clark:
Our department recently received a petition from Container Corporation of America to·
annex to the City of Renton approximately 42 acres of their property in the NW 114 of
Sec. 24-23-4 and the SW 1/4 of Sec. 13-23-4 (see attached map). The Cities of Renton
and Tukwila are also in the process of negotiating in the same area a boundary adjustment
of the borders of the two communities. Examination of King County Assessor's maps in
the vicinity indicate several small tracts of land (tracts 32-35) located along the City of
Tukwila -King County border. It appears also that two (2) small parcels are segregated
within the Container Corporation property. We at the City of Renton find it necessary to
have precise legal descriptions of all these identified parcels for both the annexation and
the boundary adjustment. This is necessary in order for us to determine specific acreages
and assessed valuations for the individual parcels. Bob Bergstrom from Public Works
Department suggested we contact you and whatever assistance you can provide would be
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
~~ ~ Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:162IG:wr
Enclosure
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
.~ 1096 NOTICE OF INTENT D 7596 ANNEXATION PETITION
TO: Building &. Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks &. Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other:, ________ _
SUBJECT: C()NTA t/ll EA. CDQP(J8. ttTlIJN Annexation
LOCATION: .'000
Date Circulated 3 lell I S6 Date Comments Due 3 I~'I 66
General Information:
Area: t 4iJ. Acres Street Length t 31SD Feet
Assessed Value (198 __ ): $,----Estimated Population:, _____ _
Current Uses: Pk~bA,e ~ &'io pl~t C--(C<M;"'iVUlr
Co,~or,..it"'
Future Use: rS;~d .. r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department:, __________________ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
.=~~~-----------------Date,--~/--~/~-Signature
"' ... ~c " p." t.> . 1:\," .....
, .-,
--; o."V 'J .f,. r......::. .... ;
•
• ,.
: ~,6'.:$;(1
. -,
..,: • '#I t ' •.
t:..) ~'''.'' ... , _41 J U-.oI ~
'-..l' 1~~'
• • f'{-~1t .... ,,:.~ 'V~ . -, . .. .....--~ .., .,~ <if .f ,'*I1! ~. ,
A· . .
.'
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 1096 NOTIC~ OF INTENT D 7596 ANNEXATION PETITION
Building & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other: ----------
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: CDNTAlNEA., CDReM"Tl~N Annexation
LOCATION: ·1000
Block.
Date Circulated 3 lell I S6 Date Comments Due 3 IGlII86
General Information:
Area: t 4d-
Assessed Value 098_):
Acres
$
Street Length t 3 lSI:) Feet
------Estimated Population:, ____ _
Current Uses: &~bA' e ~ boy. pU O-(( .... ±a..·Y'A r
Coy ~ Or,.. it 9"""
Future Use: 6;~d .. r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Departme nt:'_...l6~.;"u'-!.\ .;"v~O~\C!.(\)=.::.(...I.?_if--'.l ..... D:.-aN~'CL(lJ~G-'---.
1.
3.
2.
4.
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
\\X)
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? -(HB \<'J~'\L., 'R..Of>O ---rR.fI(,.\J,S 1V TIfE U.J:J::::,'-f
Hlo~ wtJ yo~:~e~er~~1;i ~~~\j~ea~UND~ ~ 0
W /1/4 b01uOIID(2, ~R.Mt1 ~ ZoNIi1XD F'rI\.lO GI\-IVO O.5'f.>
\'(\ 1.~ Yh f\-11 on) c: SGfft .. \)\Gf1 S &. • ' CaN thi!; arinexahon be lierved by your department wlthlO your current budget resources?
D~~;or this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
'--)t'?2) K..'2..60\'V\VV\'eJ0D txl\)IVf<><.A--iIO(\) 1 rv1 0 T11G
01f< Cf' Re-rv10tv.
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
,
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 10% NOTIC~ OF INTENT D 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
TO: Building & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works
Other:, ________ _
SUBJECT: CiJNTAlNEA CDRPM"T/~N Annexation
LOCATION: ,
Block.
Date Circulated 3 lell I S6 Date Comments Due 3 1,iJ1186
General Information:
Area: t 4;}.. Acres Street Length ! 31SD Feet
Assessed Value (198 __ ): $,-----Estimated Population:, _____ _
Current Uses: P..,ct .. ,e ~ be.,. p~t C-(( ... ;"'i~r
CDV' ~ OUd1 In"
Future Use: rS;~,l .. r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
RevieWing Department:--!.~«=___!:::_I;.a..::;."" =-___________ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
~~~
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
y~
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional propert ies? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.) 1./
!~
DEPARTMENT~L RECOMMENDATION on this annexation~/ J~
"A ~7'/~~~y~
, ...... -~ -'. 7" /'7 L.,h /~ ~..-~~U(~ /U~O"t?P'~A11'::·'lL ________ Date :5' I .;:26 I fib
Signature
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 10% NOTIC~ OF INTENT D 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
Building de Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks de Recreation
Police
Public Works
CilV OF RENTON
MAR Z,,;, 1986
Oth POLICY -er: _________ I'l""O!.OPM.NT nCO,
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: CDNTAlNEA CDRPfJP.1fTlfJN Annexation
Date Circulated 3 lei. I S6 Date Comments Due 3 I~'I S6
General Information:
Area: t 4a. Acres Street Length ! 3150 Feet
Assessed Value (198 __ ): $_----Estimated Population: _____ _
Current Uses: PA~tA,e ~ bov.. p{a,j O.o(C ... ±a."yo.A~
Uy~op.'h~
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department:fAa S <D RfcRzAll ON
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
NO
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? reS
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
~JT1<.-IS c\'&l~t-TO -lc.z,,€-re.,'I'Of\.& \'~ which sh.w& ~
"11'11£. KLfet..\idf\ ~ 0 ~ -\{(\(lM'\t~,
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
'C0s
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
'(W
DEPARTAW~~~JMMENDATION on this annexation:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM'
~ 1096 NOTICE OF INTENT D 7596 ANNEXATION PETITIOit-iI,' ~ . ~~ "
TO: Building & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
FROM: Policy Development Department
Parks & Recreation -<':;-::;6'
Police
Public Works
Other: ________ _
CITY Of RENTON
MAR 2,,11986
SUBJECT: C()NTAlNEA. CDRMR1fTl~N Annexation
LOCATION:
Date Circulated 3 lei. 166 Date Comments Due 3 Ittilll86
General Information:
Area: t 4iJ. Acres Street Length t 31SD Feet
Assessed Value (198 __ ): $_---Estimated Population:, _____ _
Current Uses: e..~b&, e ~ &'10 p(a ..... ± O-('C<Mt.. .. Y'A ~
Ci>r~or,..+tcm
Future Use: 6;~d& r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department:' __ -EF~IR~E2... _____________ _
1. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
None
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department?
To a slight degree, ..
Z. How will your depart ment service this annexation area?
In -the same manner as to other areas
4. can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
Yes
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
Favor annexation
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
Recommend Annexation
1===_~L::~5:!!i~~~1~4~ .. ::::. :::::J~ _______ Date 3 I 24 I 86
Signature
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 10% NOTIC~ OF INTENT D 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
Building & Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks & Recreation
Police
Public Works
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 2 if 1986 Other:, ________ _
-POLIC'!
n~/J:U)p~:'t=NT I"'\CC~
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: Ct>NTALNSA. CDQ~1fTIt>N Annexation
LOCATION:
Block.
Date Circulated 3 lell I S6 Date Comments Due 3 liJII86
General Information:
Area: t 4iJ. Acres Street Length ! 31SD Feet
Assessed Value 098 __ }: $,----Estimated Population: _____ _
Current Uses: PA~bA' e ~ be.,. plo ... ± O"'!C ... t..iV'A ~
Uy I'0r,..+t tn'\
Future Use: is;~,l .. r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department: BCD c9" 2n AJ LV (.....,
1.
3.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department? N0
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? '-1 65
2. How will your depart ment service this annexation area? W l-t fl e;-t-.lS-r-./""; Co,
6T4-FF
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
~'8S
5. Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that -this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 10% NOTIC~ OF INTENT D 75% ANNEXATION PETITION
Parks <Ie Recreation TO: Building <Ie Zoning
Finance
Fire
~ Library
Police
Public Works
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 2 '1 1986 Other:, ________ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: C()NTAlNEA Ct')IJPM8T1()N Annexation
LOCATION: ·1000
Date Circulated 3 leU I S6 Date Comments Due 3 lelll86
General Information:
Area: t 4:J. Acres Street Length ! 31St:) Feet
Assessed Value (198 __ ): $_---Estimated Population:, _____ _
Current Uses: PcL~b .. , e ~ &'1-p(a .... ± O-(,C4W'--t..i~ ~
Ur I' o~ft cry"\
Future Use: 6it1l',,[ cL r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department:, ___ L_'_, _b....;,..y_~:.."'_'1.L-_________________ _
I. Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
fi/o
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? '
fles
2. How will your department service this annexation area?
;::-~~n, ei-lsl,,;,j' Fac///I,Rs.
4. Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
Yes
5. Do you favor this annelcation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.)
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
!(eccJh?h? (';/ cI C'l.,;::'l'rtl1/«' /,
~N. ~e. _ Date q/ l;?tar I /qgr;
I~S~ig~n~a~tu~r~e--------~----~---==~==~==~------
TO:
ANNEXATION REVIEW FORM
~ 1096 NOTIC: OF INTENT 07596 ANNEXATION PETITION
Building &. Zoning
Finance
Fire
Library
Parks &. Recreation
Police
Public Works CiTY OF RENTON
MAR 2/} 1986 Other:, ________ _
FROM: Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: CiJNTALNEA CDR/VJS."TI~N Annexation
Date Circulated 3 lell 186 Date Comments Due 3 1011186
General Information:
Area: t 4;). Acres Street Length t 31St:) Feet
Assessed Value 098 __ ): $_---Estimated Population:, _____ _
\
Current Uses: Pfl.~tA' e ~ &.,. p~t dC.,.t...Y'A ~
U(~or,.· .. hcrn
Future Use: ;S;~,·la. r
Estimated Future Homes: -Future Population: -
Reviewing Department:_--'R'-'='ft...::,..· ~..::::...;G=-~ ___ Iz_s _______ _
1.
3.
2.
4.
5.
Does this annexation represent any unique problems for your department?
A--V
Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by
your department? \/2
~
How will your department servi_ce this annexati°k~ Ct..j/-~-0c-----
Can this annexation be served by your department within your current budget resources?
Y"'-5
Do you favor this annexation? A revised annexation containing additional properties? Or
recommend that this annexation not be approved? (If an alternate annexation would be
preferred, please illustrate it on the attached map.) I L.
y-<.:5
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION on this annexation:
."si=gn-:.:-atu:::::-re--89-1c _I£_~=~(c:ju>l!.--___ Date.---='S~/2_[----,-"/ct"=-
P AGE
.H 06
)
'J~JJ O'~I "V~ ~ SEATILE IJA
132304-9074-06
BURDICK fLOYD 0 JR
1084 SW 3RO PL
RENTON WA
J 132304-9075-05
\
TANG GORSON
5035 15TH NE '10,
SEATTLE .WA
132304-9076-04
STROCK PAUl. V
6848 S 133RD
SEATTLE WA
132304-9078-02
KING COUNTY
132304-9080-08
KING COUNTY
~~l ~UK Ut UL~ 1 M C HADlOCK ADD /. 98178 TH SWlY ALG SELY LN SD BLK 298.886 FT TO TPOB TH CONTG SWlY
60 FT TH S 72-56-45 E 136.523 FT
TH N 17-03-15 E 60 FT TH N
72-56-45 W 136.741 FT TO TPOB
13-23-04 9074 10.92762
E0675 BEG ON WlY EXT OF S LN BLK 4
EARLINGTON ADD 130 FT WLY OF MOS
98055 WlY COR SO BLK 4 TH CONTG ALG
SD WlY EXT 40 FT TH N 17-03-15 E
100 FT TH S 72-56-45 E 40 FT
TH SWl Y TO BEG
13-23-04 9075 10.92762
1278 W 80 FT OF E 282.38 FT OF GL 8
LY N OF CEDAR RIVER·PIPE.LN RIW
98105 & S OF 133RD ST LESS POR LY S OF
LN BEG ON W LN THOF 67 FT N OF S
LN TH E TAP ON E LN 85 FT N·OF S LN
132304 9076 10.92762
479999 S 141 FT OF E 128 FT OF W 3.5
AC GL 9 LESS RD LESS C/M RGTS
98178
'! Ii; I II
I 1~ 1
1+
1 I ;,
I 1 I I
13C
I ! I I I I
130 2d5QC " . 1
16
11"'0( ~8d7
I ! I . I i
I ! i
I .. ! I
~l~ k~
I! ! i
13
13-23-04 9078 pIll
0740 0577 PORS OF GLS 5 & 6 & TRS 27 & 28
RENTONSHORELANDS 2ND SUPL ADD
DAF BEG ON S LN OF SEC 1661.13 F
E OF SW COR TH N 22-26-02 W
226.17 FT TO TPOB TH N 67-33-58 I
300 FT TH NWlY ON CURVE TO LFT
CENTER OF WCH BEARS S 67-33-58 W
627.46 FT TAP ON NLY·LN TR 27 TH,
SWlY ALG NLY LN TRS 27 & 28 TAP.
OF CENTER OF SD CIRCLE TH S TAP
ON ARC OF SD CIRCLE CENTER OF WC~
BEARS .S 327.46 FT TH SELY ALG
CURVE OF SD ARC TO TPOB
I I ! I ,5~1' III
13-23-04 9080
0740 0577 BEG SW COR OF SW 1/4; TH N
29-51-00 W 114.7 FT; TH N
166-21-00 E 153.9 FT' TH S ~~7-OO E TAP ON E(Y KGN CM & SP RR R/W & TPOB: TH NELY ALG SD
ELY HGN 108 FT MIL TAP ON SLY ~~ TR 33 RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPL: TH ELY ALG SD SLY KGN 33 FT
MiL TO WL Y KGN CO RD' ~~, ~E~~ ~~~TS~.~Y.rr<~~~THGN
i. ! i I
I: I "i Ii
! I I' ! Iii
II 'II I!.'; j I
I Iii . I I ;~[J.) I I
1 II I I: 'j i ,i i! I I i I I I
'I! I! 1 1 I t I
i !!!
!
i
I
! .... ,1,1
f
! I
i !
I
I
!
! !
1 17:4
I
I
FO/
i !
i ~
I i
! J
i684b
i I
I '
II
II
t i,,;
i
PARCEL CONTI U E D ON Nt
132304-9081-07
PARCEL NUMBER· NAME"& MOAESS LEGAl. OUCRlPnoN LEVY SR
RATE EX
132304-9081-07
WINTERBURN DOUGLAS
7304 S 13lND
SEATILE WA
HGN ALG CURVE TO LEFT RAD
300 FT CENTER BEARING N 25-21-49
E AN ARC DIST 50.74 FTi TH S
74-13-19 W 68.84 FT; TH S
83-41-02 W 60.83 FT' TH ALG CURV TO RGT RAO 667.96 FT CENTER
BEARING N 15-46-41 W AN ARC DIST
108.45 FT MIL TO SD ELY MGN;
TH NELY ALG SD ELy HGN24 FT MIL
TO TPOB
13-23-04 9081 10.92762
290969 POA GL 8 LY NL Y OF CITY OF
SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LN R/W
98178 & S 133RO ST & LY WLY OF A LN
433 FT ELY OF & HEAS AT RIA TO
SLY PROD OF W LN OF TR 7 L H
ROGERS ALDER GROVE & ELY orA LN
350 FT ELY OF & MEAS AT RIA TO
SLY PROD OF W LN SD TR 7
lEVY VAlUATIONS
COOE l-lANO I-IWS
13(
132304-9082-06
SCHUMS~Y DONALD W
2019 JONES AVE NE
RENTON WA
13-23-04 9082 10.92762 ~I 13 c0281 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO
132304-9083-05
CHICAGO MILWAUKEE ST PAUL
ATTN: BENTON R "
PO BOX 6205
CHICAGO IL
1277122 RECORDING NO 7901150918 ,
98055 SO PLAT OAF -W 160.48 FT OF GLn~ LESS CO RO TGW W 160.48 rT or PO ..
PLAT SOUTH BEACON HILL TRS LY S .
OF LN ESTAB BY S C CAUSE 214827
LESS C/M RGTS
13-23-04 9083 11.29014
610661 C/M RGTS ONLY-POR or SE 1/4 & SW 1/4.0F STR 13-23-04 DAF-
BEG AT S 1/4 COR or SO SEC 13
60680 TH N 00-58-28 E ALG N/S C/L OF
So SEC 13 A oIST OF 884.84 FT TO SE COR OF rR 26 RENTON
SHORELANDS 2ND SUPl & TPOB
TH S 72-37-52 W ALG S BNORY
OF sD TR 26A DIST OF 382.60 FT
TH N 70-54-0. W ALG S BNORY
OF SD TR 26 A DIST OF 73.51 FT
TO E LN OF CHAS BROWNELL DC
M41 TH N 01-24-04 E ALG SO E
LN 950.58 FT TO A LN 35 FT SLY
OF & PLW C/L OF HOST SLY TR
OF C.M.ST PIP RR TRS TH ALG SD
LN 35 FT SLY OF & PLW C/L OF
<:h M/"IC;T 11:1., TD AI t: NUl '1"1'1 .. ,.,. -
~I 11
GEN'L TAX
I I
lJ7
I
I
i20~6
I
me. AS'Ml TOTAL
~
;
;
1
II
i I
!12567
I i , I
I I
II ~Oi~2
I
AMOUNT ,~
--, , 7U\1
. ,t
I
~~
i
}5~
j
I
535~ ;
I
!
}35~
1
33~
I
335~2
33L
~35~2
h,~,
! i
1 i ! .
i ~27'61 : ;
u.
AMOUNT ,AID I ; I !
I 1 I I i
! I · i
! I
! I
I I
!
,
I
I
I I ,
1
,
·
I I ,
I
I I i ,
I !
I I ,
I
I I I I I
! , I
1 I I
! ! I I I I I •
1 1
i
! 1 ! 1 i ! l 1
" II: A I
I I I
I I
II
I ' • I I • I I
I I
1 !
I !
1 !
"lcoTi-DATE
,.. " " I:
F 02
.ARCEL NUMB ........ 6 ........ '
m~p~. Jor .;~ ,.,U,.
.ENTON'~~TH 98056
722950-01Jo-o2
HAIDER JOHH & GARNET L 399999
9245 RAINIER AVE S
SEAnLE WA 9&178
12295CHl131-o1
CITY OF RENTON
/ -
722950-0140-00 45~ RENTON HOTELS INC
112 S 3RD
RENTON WA 9~055
!.:.
..
' -722950-0281-09
07400577 KING COUNTY
r"--:= .........
./
722950-031()-()4
STATE OF WN
722950-0320-02
BLACK RIVER QUARRY INC
6808 S 140TH
SEAmE VA 98178
722950-0330-00
OVRR&NAVCO 201303 X UNION PACIFIC RR CORP
PO BOX 2500 ,/' 80020 BROOHFIElD co
72295()-()34()-()8 o V R R & NAV CO 201303
X UNION PACIFIC RR COR~
PO BOX 2500
BROOHFIELD CO ' 80020
722950-035D-:05
BURLINGTON NORTHERN COB75
TAX DEPT 437 CENTRAL BLDG
800 3RD AVE
SEAmE WA
./ 98104
~ 0440 1178
722950-0370-01
722960-0010-0s
LINDEMOOO LORNA
4300 NE SUNSET BLVD .A-l
RENTON VA
722960-0020-03
SPRINGTREE DEVEL~ENT
PO BOX 2031
TACONA WA
722960-0030-01
t1ATMEY 1ltOf4AS 11
8TH fLOOR PACIFIC BlDG
SEAmE WA
722960-0040-09
CHANDLER FONSO J & PAULINE 333290
10457 1000TH AVE W
OAK HARVOR WA 98277
122960-0050-1l6
HEAD GARY
4300 NE SUNSET BlVD .A-5
RENTOH WA
722960-0060-04 .
WHEELDON R & MASLAKO B J
RENTON SPRINGTREE 'A-6
4300 NE SIJNSET BLVD,
SEATTLE WA
722960-0070-02
LOFTUS MARl(
RENTON SPRINGTREE APT
4300 NE SUNSET BLVD
DII:NT,..., UA
LEGAL DIICAI'TION ~;'lE Ell_ ",NTON 'N. SUPL
~kON 11 .. d014 SHORELANDS 2ND SUPl
~ LAKE ST !r' F~~O~~~~&S ~!~~OR'
' 10000 FT _ TAXABLE
.uon rour.o"
':~NTON ONn •• , AN.' 2NI: ~~:014
:~ ~R, :~w~~5!t~~ 'TV Of
Ii '!l E ~g:~~~ ,~ LAKE W~;; '8 F1 'LN
:~~f 1;';! [:~
~: ";~~~ 21 :::~~~ .I!
.0 !I~ J\y : Nt.y
'Al R~OC ~ 1s~ 'R
:~~NTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPl
;~~NTON '10.66046 ' SHORELANDS 2ND SUPl ,
i~~NTON S~LANDS 2ND SuPL '
I~NTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPl
./
I~~NTON ~ELANDS 2ND SUPl
~:o: K:~:2> own •• , .0 2ND StoPL
SHORELAND! 2ND SUPl
BlD A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDONINIUK
VALUE .61
BlD A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDOMINIUM
OF VALUE .67
6
B\;D A 11.29014
SPRINGTAEE CONDOMINIUM
VALUE .67
OLD A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDOMINIUM
VALUE .67
BLD A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDOMINIUM
VALUE .67
B\;D A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDONIHIUM
VALUE .67
OLD A 11.29014
SPRINGTREE CONDOMINIUM
VALUE .67
Vl:;n .. , ....... I ......... .,' '.
'"w 2~ Xl( 28.
,
.-7l ~
,,~ 11 ~OC 21(
f' " 2~ SOC
I
poe
~
-
( ~&
--1=) ( 1& -
l-I--/' ~ i--D
~OC ,
G12 242304-9008-04
, P AGE
H 12
., ItECn-DATE
/
/
242304-9008-04
CONTAINER CORP OF AMERICA
1 1 $T HAT\. PLAZA
CHICAGO IL
,
242304-9014-06
... c . ....., TOTAL 1_
!
J , ••
1 5~
II
----------
3((,./~c'
--/'
......
..... . ,'
, "
'"
Receipt # ____ _
C lTV OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NAME~: ____ ~/~._'_' ____ ~'_' __ ~;~ __________ ~ __ ~~ ___________________________ DATE __ ~,,~.;_'~ .. _--_/_,_._.,_~ __ ___
PROJECT & LOCATION'_L/_~ ___ ~~ ___ '~!_~ __ ~'~/L; ___________ __
Application Type
'/ i
, .. / ..)" I' ,. /t .... '/
/ I J
Basic Fee Acreage Fee
Environmental Checklist
Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
Total
TOTAL FEES 1/-r1o
Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.
Thank you.
---_._-------..---.-.,~-.-~~"-' ...... -. '----"--, --.,. .... ,~---.....
. " . , "
, ,
': ,.,' '
, -,
"
"; . ~ < .. ', .
,,' . ',', ( ...
... , ;.: .
. ::,~, ':: ':'"
", "
. . ,"
.-,
" ~ " ,
.",
, ".
"
" .
" ".
. '.:
" '. "
:;.' , . ','
. •
, , ,
"
" '.
10% NOTICE OF INTENT
February 26, 1986
Honorable Mayor Barbara Shinpoch
Members of the City Council
Renton, Washington 98055
Container Corporation
..;o:.;.f....:..;;Am"". e;;.;r-'i..;.c..;..a _________ Annexation
CITY OF RENTON
cEQ 26 1986
POLICY'·
n""~LOPMF.NT ~.PT.
We (I). the undersigned owner(s) constitute a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the
assessed valuation for general taxation of the property for which annexation Is petitioned.
The proposed annexation Is for the purpose of: ~L1st reasons)
In order to participate with other' Renton City property owners in forming an
L.I.D. petition for sanitary sewer service.to our property which is contiguous
to the City of Renton boundry.
Further. pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120. the undersigned petitioners agree to:
I. Accept the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan.
2. Accept the City of Renton zoning regulations.
3. Assume any pre-existing bonded Indebtedness of the City.
Signed H. J. Ramirez, Opera 10 Manager
..
.
,. CITY OF RENTON
Pc. ;y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN'
r
ANNEXATION APPLICATION
NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: Please complete all appropriate sections of the application below.
Information contained in this application will be used in preparing all of the necessary
documentation for this annexation; therefore, please type or clearly print all of the necessary
information. If additional space is required for response to any of these sections, feel free to
attach additional sheets to this application. If you have any questions with regard to this
application, please feel free to contact the Policy Development Department at 235-2552, or you
may discuss this matter in person in the Municipal Building, third floor.
10% NOTICE OF INTENT APPLICATION -Please include a $200 filing fee. (Check attached)
PROPONENT CONTACT PERSON if other than
proponent
Operations Manager Name Container Corporation of America H •• 1. Ramirez,
Address 7000 South l43rd Street
City Renton, vJA 98055
Telephone
3..?S3 (206) 235-~
LOCATION (Same as above)
Property Address (Same as above) Lot Area Sq.Ft. --Acres 42
Legal Description
(See attached)
PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION -Briefly describe the reasons you deSire to annex .
In order to participate with other Renton city property owners in forming
an L.I.D. petition for sanitary sewer service to our property. (See attached
1 etter from City of Renton, dat.ed 12/02/85; Ut il it i es Commit tee Report dated
09/23/85; and P. 2 of Renton City Council Minutes dated 09/23/85.)
We are currently zoned IlMHII (heavy manufacturing) inKing County; however;
wi 11 be submitting an application to the City of Renton for rezone to "MP"
(manufacturing park).
AFFIDAVIT -.r 1 (" X1 ,,-vI/l A _/
J. Ramir9~, Operations r·1gr., ~ truly sworn, declare that I am
_oar..
I, H. D Owner of the Property Involved
[:J Authorized Representative to act for the Property Owner .
in this application and that the foregOing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 25th DAY OF Februarv ,
19 86
NO~ PUBL.~IN£~N~ FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING
AT ~~ ., \--< ".'\...~z.a...~ Renton vJashinoto~
Name of Notary Public: Address:
>
-, ...........
CITY OF RENTON
RESOWTION NO. /.f;(3
WHEREAS it is advisable to provide and establish definite
guidelines and standards concerning the furnishing of sanitary
sewer services to property owners residing outside the present or
future City Limits of the City of Renton, and
WHEREAS the City Council does hereby set forth such appropriate
guidelines for the benefit of the various departments of the City,
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The following standards and guidelines are hereby
established and shall be generally adhered to by the variou's City
Departments in dealing and considering applications by property
owners for connection to sanitary sewer lines whenever such property
owners are residing outside the present and future City Limits, to-wit:
A. Hookups to sanitary sewer lines owned by the City
may be permitted, upon payment of the appropriate fee set
forth by ordinance, together with latecomer charges, if any,
when"such sanitary sewer line is located outside the City
Limits and the property of the petitioning owner is located
adjacent to or adjoining such existing sanitary sewer line;
AND PROVIDED FURTHER that the following additional conditions
are met:
1. A written determination has been made by the
Cityts Engineering Department that such existing
sanitary sewer line is in good, servicable
condition and has sufficient capacity to handle
such additional discharge from property owners
wishing to connect, and such capacity will be
adequate in the reasonable, foreseeable future.
Such information shall be furnished unto the
Mayor and City Council, together with any plans
that the Engineering Department may have for
the development and enlargement or other changes
affecting such sanitary sewer lines.
2. Prior to any permit for hookup, an up to date
determination shall be made by the City and/or
King County Health Department to determine
whether a serious and imminent threat to
public health exists on such adjoining or
adjacent property requiring immediate remedial
action, i.e., connection to an existing sanitary
sewer.
- 1 -
.l .--=..:
3. That there is not available to any such adjacent
or adjoining owner any reasonable alternate means
to remedy such situation; reasonable alternates
may include formation of a Local Improvement
District for sanitary sewers or agreement with
any other govenmental agency to serve such
property owner.
For good cause shown, the City '";ouncil, upon reconunendation
.of the City Engineering Department, may waive or modify
any of the foregoing conditions.
SECTION Ii: These gu~delines and standardS shall be remain in
full force and ~ffect until morlified or amended by the City Council.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
~ Helm:le ~l:tY~
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Gera? M. sheflan , C:lty Attorney
- 2 -
, ,
I-'
, . ~ t
I .. I
.. , ,
CONTAINER 'CORPORATION 'OF AMERICA: ~'
'IDENTIFYING LAND DESCRIPTION
• . ,t
The property under' review _c0!1:;l:; 1::; of 37 acre:;, lUore or le!;:;,'
of a larger parcel: conl:~ining approxima tely 49 acres, Inore .' . .
or less, ilnd the larger parcel-is ,eollullonly known us 7000 South
143rd Street, Renton, \~ushington.
The larger parcel i:; legally identified us follows:
BEG INTIl.SN OF \-ILY HGN;CO ru> H, 8 & l'1 LN OF NW 1/4 SEC 24-23-4
Til SLY ALG SO WLY HGN1740FT_ N/L TO NELY DllDRY OF NP DEL'I
LN R/H Til NHLY ALG SO R/I-('2475 FT MIL 'IO S DANK OF, DLACK mVER
IN SEC 13-23-4 'I'll ELY ALG S DANK 85 FT H/L TO S~ILY HGH CO rill
# B 'I'll SELY ALG SLY HCN 'SO RO 1450 F'r M/L TO nEG LESS DEG Sli
COR SEC 13-23-4; Til N 29":51-00 W 114.7 FT 'I'll N 66-21-00 E
153.9 FT Til S 66-57-00E TAP'(.lN ELY l1GN CH & SP RR Il./H & TrOD;
Til NELY' ALG SO ELY ~lGN 100 F'f HIL TAP ON SLY l-ICN~TIl. 33 RENTOll
SHORELAlIDS 2NO SUPLj 'l'U ELY ALG SO SLY HGN 33 FT -H/L TO \-ILY
,~ !-lGN CO RO;-TIISELY ALG SD I-lLY MCN 104 F'l' H/L; TU CONT SELY "
ALG SO NLY HGN ALG CURVE TO LEFT MO 300 FT CENT'En DEl\RIrlC H
25-21-49 I -AN ARCDIST,50.74 -:''1'; 'IH S 74-13-19 W'60.84 FT Til
-S S3-.n-0~ W 60.B3FTj'TIl ALC CURVE TO Il.GT MD 667.96 FT CEtlTER
BEARING N .1.5-46-41 \-1 AN ARC DIST 10B.45 FT M/L TO SD ELY HGN
Til NELY ALG SO ELY HGN 24, I:'T l-1/L '£0 TPOD. '
; ..... ',. ;'.
. . ~' .
"
The 37 <leres, mOrc or,le,s::;, or the smul1er parcel under rcvie~l,
does not have ~ s,epar~te ,::;tx:eet number or, legal dc:;cription.
,.' .
(zone II Gre~n River. -Section 24. Township 2~. Ra:iige '4 (Krowll Map Page 335W)
~I
.. ,
"
.. : ", ~ ..
, --
, .
I
I
1
I •
-'
4906l2H
WIT CLAIM DEED
THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH; that the grantor. CALIFORNIA
cr. ;; CONTAINER CORPORATION. a corporation duly organized and exist---_. -. , ...
"..:.;
ing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware.
and duly authorized to transact business in the State of
Washington. pursuant to a plan of complete liquidation. and
for and in consideration of the assumption of all of its
liabilities by CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA a Delaware
corporation. CONVEYS and QUIT CLAIMS unto said Container
Corporation of America all interests in the following described
real estate:
Beginning at iron bolt marking the center of section
24. township 23 north. range 4 east. W.M •• in King County.
Washington; thence north 0 03'30" west 2622.11 feet to
quarter corner between sections 13 and 24 in said township
and range; thence south 89034'43" west 1137.00 feet. more
or less. to the westerly margin of County Road No.8 (now
known as Steel Hill Road) and the true point of beginning;
thence southerly and southwesterly along said westerly mar-
gin 1740.00 feet. more or less. to the northeasterly boundary
of the Northern Pacific Belt Line right of way; thence north-
westerly and northerly along said right of way and along the
easterly boundary of land conveyed to Chicago Milwaukee &
st. Paul Railway Company (now Chicago. Milwaukee. St. Paul
and Pacific Railroad Company) for its revised wye line
2475.00 feet. more or less, to the south bank of Black River
in section 13 said township and range; thence easterly along
south bank as.oo feet. more or less. to the southwesterly
margin of said County Road No.8; thence southeasterly along
the southerly margin of said road 1450.00 feet. more or less.
to the true point of beginning; (Being all that portion of
government lots 1. 5 and 6 in section 24 and the northeast
quarter of northwest quarter of said section 24; and gove.rn-
ment lots 5 and 6 in section 13 and of the be~...9t;-W~~lfi3vJ~ \'2" ~,I;·:f1.}.rr";l1 '
\ ·;I • .ri.~·~ ~~~1T~~~ _-' \\
\
.4"'.~ .... \ ... -.. -.,-
. ..., !!".. ,. 0< ..... 1
l' I 'f,· '. t : ... -!
I \ I: .' ,. I \~Jd~
-. ~
2
on Govern~ent plat; ALL in township 23 north. range 4
east, W.M., lying between County Road No.8 and the right
of way of Northern Pacific Railway Company. and Chicago,
Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company); EXCEPT portion
thereof. if any, within the bed and shores of the Black
River as they were situated when said river ceased to be
a navigable stream.
situated in the County of King in the State of Washington .
Dated this 27-tJ, day of December, 1957.
CALIFORNIA CONTAINER CORPORATION
ByAc5~~
President
tary
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
) 55.
COUNTY OF COOK )
r' ,k.<. '('<'f.-<~ .... ..:., //i<~"'--<--:1-' -. v~ V' a Notary Public
in and for said County, in the State aforesaid. DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that Wesley M. Dixon personally known to me to be the President
of California Container Corporation, and Clarence H. Seeley
~ersonBlly known to me to be the Secretary of said corpor~tion.
and personally known to me to be the same persons whose names
are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me
this day in person and severally acknowledged that as such
. ' .. ,
3
President and Secretary. they signed and delivered the said
instrument as President and Secretary of said corporation.
and caused the corporate seal of said corporation to be
: ~ a ffixed thereto. pursuant to authori ty. 9i ven by the Board _ .
. ~ of Directors of said corporation as their free and voluntary
act. and as the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation, for the uses and purposes therein set forth.
GIVEN under my hand and ,seal this ClZ m day of December.
1957.
My commission expires:
;Zz...l-Lu ..... <.. <-7 r /:7 c: /
?J
j / .', __ ~ /0
rikd tor Rccor~' '// r,"'/19~" ~-"/'M.~
Request of , ... ' .;' :" < . .~ ~ ~ ( .. ' :,/ , .
--ROSERT. A. MORRIS. County Auc;to.
SEATTLE 4WASHIN13TON
AMOUNT S 88, 500.00 PREMIUM $ 352.75 POLICY No. B-510286
For .. aluo. \X'ASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. hereinafter called the company. a "'''I'O"ltl''''
incorporated under the la\\'5 of the Stiue of \'('ashington and duly authorized by the State Insurance Commissiollc.:r {o
insure titit's. dot'S hereby insure, subject [0 the .annexed conditions. hereby made a part o( this policy,
CALIFORNIA CONTAINER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
Ill"ir~ ,IIlJ Jt:\"isec:s (if a (Drroration. its successors) ht'ft'inaftt:'f "died the insured. against loss or dam:lgtO not c:xnonlillg
EIGHTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED-------------------------------D"II:lr,.
whil h t!lt.' ill~Ufl'J may SlJst:lin oy rc,:,tSon of anr deftet in the insurtJ's title to all the estate or int~rt:st in tht prc:rnist<s
"'pt'(ilieJ Jnd uL"scrihcJ in Sdll'uuie A. hen.'to annexed anu"hereby made a part of this policy. or b>' reason of li{'no;, or
l. .. nnllllhr;lIKe~ charging tht, same. at the date of this policy. sa,'e ;tnd excepc chis policy does nm insuf<'-against If)~s Of
j.ll11,!~t' by fl';!"nn (It" ,ln~ l'<"{atc or ilHt:n:sr. Jc:ft'ct. liell. t'llcllmhrJIlCt' or objt'ction Ik)tt'd in annext'd Schc:duk B, \\ hi( h
I' .\ 1",In hl'n:nf. "\I1~· 11 l "S ullJt'r this policy is (0 he t:stahlisill'd in {he manner provided ill saiJ conditions anJ o;;h.1I1 hl'
, .... Iid 1I1'ill1 ({)mpiiallL"t' hy the insured with and as prt:snibeJ in said conditions, .IIlJ not otherwise,
IN \VITNESS \\'HEREOF. WASHINGTON TITI.F. IN~t'R .... :-.;Cl: COMPANY has caused tht'se prt'sc:llts to be .. !tlthcll'
ti\',lIl,d b~' thl' t:ll'simiit: si,cnatllrl' oj" its PresiJent. anJ it~ (nrpor;ltt' name and st'al to hl' hereunto aftixcJ' hut this '"" 'Iil"y
" !lIlt "did link· ..... ~Htl .. ,tl"\l by thL' Sl'CrL'tuy or an A~~i.~[;lIlt St'cft't.lry,
February, 1956 , ,I[ A .~I
WASHINGTON T:I!~E~SURANCE I;!OMPANY
B."
.. ll1or:
.-' ,~
.Form P 16 ')WNERS OR MORTGAGEES
POLICY No. B-510266
I. The "'tale or in«'"'t of the insured coveted by this policy.
Fee s1mple estate.
2. Description of the property with' respect to which this policy is issued.
Beginning at iron bolt marking the center of section 24, to~mship 23
north, range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington; thence north
0°03'30" west 2622.11 feet to quarter corner between sections 13 and
24 in said township and range; thence south 89°34'43" west 1137.00
feet, more or less, to the westerly margin of County Road No. 8 (nol':
Imown as Steel Hill Road) and the true point of beginning; thence
southerly and southwesterly along said westerly margin 1740.00 feet,
more or less, to the northeasterly boundary of the Northern Pacific
Belt Line right of way; thence northwesterly and northerly along said
right of way and along the easterly boundary of land conveyed to
Chicago Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company (now Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company) for its revised wye line
2475.00 feet, more or less, to the south bank of Black River in
section 13 said township and range; thence easterly along south bank
85.00 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly margin of said Coun::'
;'load !)o. j; thence southeasterly along the soc;cnerly margin of sa.:.i
road 1450.00 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning;
(Being all that portion of government lots 1, 5 and 6 in section 24
and the northeast quarter of northwest quarter of said section 211;
and government lots 5 and 6 in section 13 and of the bed of lal{e
shown on Government plat; ALL in township 23 north, range 4 east, H.H.,
lying between County,Road No.8 and the right of way of Northern
._ Pacific Railway Company, and Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway
. Company); EXCEPT portion thereof, if any, within the bed and shores
of the Black River as they were situated when said river ceased to be
a navigable stream.
, ,. .... ,',." .. ~.
I.
POLICY No. B-510286
This policy does not insure against:
Quc~rillns t)( IO(:lril>n. boundary and area; o\'erlars and encrodchmenrs br imrrovcments ht'llllI~in~ In .
thest:' Of Jditlining premises; all dependent upon 3ccual survey for determination.
The t'xisren(e of roads or v,:ays not established of record. or existence of roumy roads.
Ri~h(s or (Iaims of persons in possession. nO[ shown of record: ri~hts claimeJ under insrrumC'nlS of which
no notice is of record and rights or c1aim~ based upon tacts of which no notice is of record hut of which
the insured has notice: material or labor liens of which no notice is of record: liens created under tht'
\X.'orkl1lco's Compt'nsation Act.
.... Exct"rrions clno reservations in United Stares patents: any governmental action b;)seJ upon rhe claim (hat
;,IIlY rarr of said premises is the bc:u of na\Oigablt; waters; anion by any govcrnnlt:ntal a~en(y tlX the
purpose of regulating occupancy or use of said premises or any building or structure tht:"reono
~. Generai'laxos not yet payable: matters relating to special assessments and special levies. if any. p,,·«dillg
[he same hecoming lixed and shown as a lien.
6. Service or installation charges by any city, town or district
for ut1lities.
NOTE: General taxes for 1956 in the sum of $277.10 on said premises,
less coal and mineral rights, being Tax Nos. 8, 72, 74 and
26, and $.58 on coal and mineral rights, in a portion of
said premises, being Tax No. 51, will become payable
February 15, 1956.
(End of Schedule B)
I. :-.10TICE OF DEFI'CT. SUIT OR ACTION: The Company shall""ave the right to. and will. at its'own cost. Jefend
lilt' in:->mc.'d in :dJ ~lIi(s •• \1..'(;0110;; or rroccet.iin,l!s founded upun;J. daim of ririe. encumbrance or defect which c:xisted or is c1.dl1lcd
ttl ha\'c t,'xistcu prior in d.ut' to this policy and nm excepted herein; reserving. however. the option at any time of setding the
,:iaim or r:tyill~ the poliq' in full. In case ilny such suit, a"loo or proceeding shall be instituted it shall be the duty of the insured
at once to ~i\'e Ilt)[ice thereuf in writing to the company at its Home Office, and, if the insured is a party to such suit. '1Crion or
pw\.-t,'c,.'Jing. to secure to the romp:'"}". within tt'n days after service of the first process upon the insured, the right to defend such
SUiL aCtion or procccJing in the o:tmc of the insured so fa'r as necessary [Q prmect the insured, and to render all reasonable 3ssi;.
t;1I1Cl' in surh defense. If such nmice shall nm be given. or the right to defend secured. as above provided, then all liability of the
comp;tny with rei!~\rd ttl til(: subject matter of such suit, action or proceeding shall cease and be dererminedi puwidelj. huwcver.
th:lt failure to gi\'e such notke shall in no case prejudice the insured if the insured shall not have an~' knowledge of such suit,
;Inion or proceeding:
2. CLAIM OF LOSS; PAYMENT OF LOSS: In the event of final judicial determination by a COUrt of compe,ent juri,.
diction. ~IIlJcr which the insured is dispossessed or deprived of the premises covered hereby or the estate or interest insured is
impaired by reason of an}' adverse imerest, lien or encumbrance n~t excepted herein. or, if chis policy covers a mong:1J!ee's
interest. and such Jinal judicial determination shall defeat or impair the mortgagor's title [Q all or any pan of said premises
or establish the priori,y to the mortgage of a lien or encumbrance not excepted in this policy, claim may be made hereunder,
pn)'\'iJed rhe condirions have been complied with in all respects, A statement in writing of any loss or damage. for which it is
claimed the compan)' is liable under this policy, shall be furnished to the company within sixty days after soch loss or damage
shall h:l\'e been ascertained. No right of aerion shall accrue under this policy until thirty days after such statement shaH ha\'e
been furnished and no recovery shall be had under this policy unless an action shall have been commenced thereon within one
),ear after the expiration of said thirty days.
3. LIMIT' OF LIABILITY; SUBROGATION: The Company may at any time pay this policy in full, whereupon ,!II
liabilit), of the company shall terminate. The total liability under this policy, exclusive of COstS (the COstS not including in any
. case fees of counse! or attorneys employed by the insured), shall in no case exceed the face of the policy, and every pa),ment by
the com pan)' shall reduce the policy by the amount paid. Whe,\ the company shall have paid a loss under this policy it shall be
subro,g~l[ed [0 all righrs :lnd remedies which the insured may have against any person or properr}' "'jeh respeer to such claim, or
would ha\'e if this policy had not been issued, and the insured shall forthwith transfer all such rights to the compan)' accurd·
in,c.ly. If the rayment made by rhe company does nor cover rhe loss of the insured, such subrogation shall be proponinn::uc. In
GiSt this poliq' (overs J mortgagee's interest only. the company may pay rhe insured the entire mortgage inJebrcdnt's5. with
interest at thl' rare spc'>citied in the mongage, and thereupon the insured sh:lll assign and transfer to rhe comr:lOY ,{he mOTr,t!a,l;e
;1IlJ the indebtedness secured thereby, together with all instruments evidencing or securing the same, or shall conve~' to rhe (om·
p;lny any estare lawfully vested in the insured by virtue of acquisidon of said premises, and all liability of [he company shall
thereupon terminate. Demand for payment must be accompanied by production of the policy for endorsement of soch pay·
ment. If the policy be not so produced, indemnity satisfactory' to the company must be furnished.
4, REFUSAL TO PURCHASE ESTATE: The Company shall not ~e liable for any loss or d.mage resulting from the
refusal of any pany to enter inco. or carry ouc, any contract respecting the estate or interest insured.
5. LI,\BIUTY L'NDER MURTGAGEE'S POLICY: If this polk)' (UVers a mong,l,L;tc::t iml-rt-St uIII}" :lI1d an}" in .... urL ... .l
a(quires said premises. or any part thereuf. by foredosure, or in other legal manner, in satisfaction of said inJeb((~Jness. or
any part thereof. or under FHA insurance contract, this policy shall continue in force in favor of such insured. :;lnd (';Jch
successor in interest in ownership, subjecr to all of the conditions hereof applicable to an owner of land,
I (,. ASSIGNMENT OF POLICY: The obligations of the Company under rhis policy shall extend to the insurl'd above
11,1111<.'\.1: to :lIlyone to whum this r~olic}' rna}' be assigned in writing endorsed hereon; {O rhe execuwrs, administf:HOfS. ht'ir5 :lI1d
dC\'ises of the Insured: and (0 any a:;signee of any mortgage which may be insured by this policy. The "Insured," whCEl ht"f('I()·
fore mentioned. refers to each party separately to whom the Company is, at the time referred (0, obligated under (he tcrme; of
thi' policy.
OF
~4.
C; l~~~. Z ... 'b -~ "Sl.., ~.
0-9. ~~ 'i~EO SEP~\:.'""~
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
December 2. 1985
John Gardner. or
Hilario Ramirez
'\
Container Corporation of America
7000 South 143rd Street
Renton, Washington 98055
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT 9EPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROCESS
Dear Mr. Gardner:
It is our understanding that you have signed an L.I.D. petition for sewer service and other
improvements in the Monster Road area, and that the petition is being circulated for
other signatures. As you are aware from discussions with City staff and from City
Council action on September 23. 1985, your property must be annexed to the City of
Renton prior to hook-up for sewer service.
The Policy Development Department is responsible for processing proposed annexations.
Currently, the legal requirements for annexations are such that the processing time is up
to six months for many annexations. In order to avoid delays in hooking up to the sanitary
sewer system, we recommend that you Initiate the application for annexation as soon as
possible. Our office will be most willing to assist you with the procedural steps in
annexation.
Please contact Steve Munson at 235-2552 for further information regarding annexation.
We look forward to receiving your petition and to completing the annexation process prior
to the time when you will be ready for hook-up to sanitary sewers.
Sincerely.
~ V(. wJ1"a..-~v
Larry M. Springer
Policy Development Director
LMS:GNW:ss
1512G
cc: Dick Houghton. Public Works
"
' ..
. ;; '.'
",;
'", '. -f '.
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT G 235-2552
CITY MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
OF RENTON
~H1IJ 2 7 1985
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH n~\I~lo"p~~~tT ""PT. ME M 0 R 4'= N Dll. M
"
R E CEiV;;:::E 0::::----,
I
~ NOV 271985
MAYOR)
. ~yor Shinpoch
~ ~ Dick Houghton
FROM: ~ene N. Williams~
TO:
CITY MA yo9{.sr1t;,. I uN
W d • h h d I . . OFFICE e are sen Ing t e attac e etter to Container Corporation to encourage
to begin the paperwork for annexation. They are participating in a proposed
L. I .D. on Monster Road,. and have been informed by staff and the City Council
that they must annex in order to get sanitary sewer service.
Please let me know if you have any concerns about the letter. We wi II hold
it a few days before releasing it. '
Go ~..:.:t-. COI.&J\.CJ. M.A""i nU\~ -A.cch..·~ .:.J.. -k. ....... J,>C. d.~ a..4.4.. -\--'.-.0 ;":;:a ~C.O 4.f.. ~ MA.t.f.A.,O~ PA.~ I.I.P~ o-.cL ~ 4.4,. NID eppoa..n~ . t
0... c1'll~ o;t t..... BOLMo\..D .RI!. C_ t ~ 'h..u4. ~~ ~6l not-~1.U\.1-D\--,
Cu Q~"t:1V'. ~~t.\,..oo 11/'2.-'
IQ..: ',"
. .,. '\' ~
:
.. , ..
"' ......
, ,-'."
.... '-..
. , /':'--..
'. : . .'.'~~:.~~ ...
.':."
,'.',,,"' :
',",'( ,-.,' ': .. ,
. "", ~ . , I. ,",(
., ..... , / .' ~ .". ",,' :./~»
,-:," :\,
~ .'
,',;' ':. ::~:~. -':~:':;r./.:.'
I "" •. " "-:" .l"
';'.. ", ',.!. ~.;.:-';". ·::·:.-~t.;'·'· ,,'. , ;., .;'@:!{>.' ' .' . , ~':" __ :'" : ,~C'i?i>,'i::.
".~ ''''-;I. ,. ::::::' • .::-: 't:--"". " "., h~·.
.;."
' .. ;
" , "
':, 'r .' .' ....
:'; "
':{:'~'~ ..
• ·l' '
,~, y.',., ..
'. '.~
. :';' ,:
. " ::,. ", ;:?>A~:~·:.··:~~r
","
' .. ,,'
.'. "
': ' .. .'
,"'" .. '
.~ ..
' .. ~.,';::,: ,l
'.' ':, ;ty~:,\,;, :.; '~:~;~.'
. ,p~ .~.\ '". f '·i~1'.
: ' .. :' ~t~:f.;.!·-~·:"':' ·:L*.J;·:· .
, '
, . :.: . ... '.
".', ,
, ".
" ,
· ..... ,·.,v •
, 11'.' ,~t ,;. ';'. ~'.>
~ :::" .. ".
Renton City Council
9/23/85 Page two
Old Business
OLD BUSINESS
1-405 S-Curve
Project
Utilities
Commi ttee
All i ngham
Request for
Sewer Connection
Container
Corporat ion
Request for
Sewer Connection
Undergrounding
Ordinance
Transportat ion
Commi ttee
Bid Award -
Taylor Avenue/
Place Improvement
Project
Bid Award -
Monroe Avenue NE
Improvement
Project
Councilwoman Mathews advised the intention of the Council
following Committee of the Whole meeting on 9/19/85 that the
list of issues and questions of concern on the 1-405 S-
Curve Project prepared by staff be forwarded to the State
Department of Transportation. Since there was no objection
by other Council members, she asked that the Administration
forward the document. Alternative No.7, selected by the
DOT, would shift the freeway 165 feet to the east, requiring
removal of nine homes along the 1100 and 1200 block of South
Third Street, nine homes along the 300 block of Cedar Avenue
South, and seven homes along the 300 and 400 blocks of Mill
Avenue South. Earliest completion date is estimated in 1990.
Committee Chairman Hu hes presented a report
recommending denial of Mr. Al ing am's request (30 Logan Avenue)
for a permanent utility easement over the Cedar River Trail
Park property to enable connection to the Metro sewer system.
Instead, the Comm i ttee recommended that a r i ght-of-,,'ay
construction permit be granted for the utility, subject to
revocation or relocation as required by the City. MOVED BY
HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report
recommending denial of the request by the Container Corporation
for connection to City sanitary sewers without annexation.
Container Corporation presently owns the package and box
plant on Monster Road SW, lying in an island of unincorporated
King County surrounded on both sides by the cities of Renton
and Tukwila. Water to this area is provided by the City of
Renton;,and requests from several property owners (Container
Corporation, First City Equities and others) for a utility
and street local improvement district have been received
by City staff. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Prior to reading and adoption of Transportation Committee
reports, City Attorney Warren explained that undergrounding
of overhead facil ities has not been included in bid specifications
due to need to revise Chapter 18 of Title IV relating to cost
and criteria for undergrounding in response to recent State
court opinion. That opinion stated that Utilities and
Transportation Commission tariffs are not applicable to cities
and utilities when it comes to franchises. The proposed
revision to the ordinance assigns cost of undergrounding
overhead facilities to the serving utilities, or owners/
occupants of real property served, or persons applying for
underground service. In instances in which the public health,
safety and welfare requires conversion of overhead facilities
underground, the utility shall bear the cost of the project.
Transportation Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report
recommending acceptance of the low bid of West Coast
Construction Company for the Taylor Avenue/PI~ce Improvement
Project in the amount of $212,592.75 ($179,388.75 -City of
Renton share;'$33,204.00 -King County's share). The Committee
further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized
to sign the contract documents. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY
HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report
recommending acceptance of the low bid of Merlino Construction
Company for the Monroe Avenue NE Improvement Project in the
amount of $412,489.23, subject to Renton School District
concurrence (Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between School
District and City of Renton). The Committee further recommended
that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the
contract documents. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
ALLINGHAM REQUEST FOR SEWER EASEMENT (Referred 8/12/85)
The Utilities Committee recommends denial of a permanent utility easement for
the Allingham sanitary sewer connection to the Metro Sewers, over the Cedar
River Trail Park, near the Renton Senior Housing Building. The Committee
recommends instead that the Public Works Department issue the appropriate
utilities, right-of-way construction permit for the Allingham sewer, which
shall be subject to revocation or relocation as required by the city.
CONTAINER CORPORATION REQUEST FOR SEWER CONNECTION (Referred 9/9/85)
The Utilities Committee recommends denial of the request by Container
Corporation for sanitary sewer connection to the city sanitary sewers without
annexation.
Container Corporation presently owns the package and box plant on Monster Road
S.W., lying in an island of unincorporated King County surrounded on both
sides by the cities of Renton and Tukwila.
The City of Renton provides water to this area and has been approached on a
staff level by several property owners; Container Corporation, First City
Equities and others, for a utility and street LID.
OF R~ ~ 4,»
f:...
C; '~Fe ~ ~..&L Ii
'6 --~-<>-<0' o~ ~~ 'i"~o SEP1E.""'lJ
BARBARA y, SHINPOCH
MAYOR
July 23, 1985
John Gardner
Personnel Chief
Container Corporation
7000 S. 143rd St.
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Gardner:
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE, SO, RENTON, WASH, 98055
On Monday, July 22nd, Bob Bergstrom of our Public Works Department
inquired on your behalf regarding the potential annexation of your
company's property to the City of Renton. One of the major advantages
of annexation is the ability to receive utility service (sewers and
water) which should improve your firm's service to your customers.
Enclosed please find the necessary materials required to file an
application with our office. Included is a small brochure which
briefly describes the entire process, explains further advantages
of becoming part of the city, and contrasts the tax bills of King
County versus Renton.
If you have questions or we can assist you in any manner, please feel
free to contact our office.
Very truly yours, .
Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM:wr
Enclosures
1
!
34
/Oly
\
43 \ 44
SPIDER STAGING SALES
IJ 50 At
DC
Tl,JS
.oc
Tl ",J
r3BD'l o
o rECHNICAL KE:.,EAHC,H CO
80 C
rt. .36
II (4 Ac
27
REAL ESTATE
E QUI TIE 5 CO R P
U In 4c
PTfJOC
Tl /
ATLAS OF SEATTLE
I ,
<Ji
~l ~i
REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE
OR PART FOR PERSONAL USE OR
RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW
KROI L MAP COMPANY, iNC, SEATTLE
SCALE <'<X) FT.", IN COPYRIGHT K M CO INC
J
\
~'b~
!1~ia!!f!:!.@GeM!,i'B,,4·!~idB.
'ei 6),,*,-_. 1
\ , ,
B
IlEAL [SI ATl EQUI rlE~ CORP
1so
8
\-' c' _0
\
\ ,
\
U 10 ~c
I:' :J
'';
\ 't //
I
I
I
I
7
IJ
25B
-0-_ 0_-0-
I ,
I
I ,
I 5;,
~I
(JC
rL
JJ'
6
12
j 211
~I
<0' ~I
I
I
29 SUPPL
-~ r ----_-----.:=0.
5
.. 't:"" , ". , ~
\ \-:1 , .. , , , , , , .. ' \1"\~~
\~
M1LWAU~FC & UL R H
!2!.£Zd _
ATLAS Of SEATTtf
rCr .... Rl.>rlr ( t'l
II II : I
I ,
I
I
I
~
I
I
i
,
::."l
4 3
1
1.\ \
c
\
-0-~
REPRODUCTION It! WhOLE ')
OR PART FOR PERSONAL uSE OR
RESALE IS PROHIBITED 8f LAW
II
I
I
I
1 ,
I
, :
"
[:1 !I!
II
\1
'I I
v' , ,\ ,
H , ,
t;~\ I
r,"
\1\
r •
II
I
~ :1 iii II
" I' :11 !"I ~III
'''II :' I 11,
, II
,I I lI'
"1 \, I
III 1,1 II 1,,1
Iii' q
,i'll , I
'i II , ,I
: I',
' i
I
I
I
I
i
, ,
I
I , I
, I
Il,
'I' II
" II
'I i'
Ii
I' II
II !,
" Ii
'; I
,
,,1' ~ > ,
'1
d
I
i I , ,
" I
Ii
! I "
" I II ,
Ii I
,I I ,
I
"
I
I
I
A
,
'\
I
,. , ,
o ' ,'-
, ' , h
---=------------. ----
-,
26
•
\1-
" ,0 -,
y
)
,
l/
~
'/ I '
II ! ,~
0
\
\
,
I
i I
I ~ I, ,
III
'I I r ! I
I ' I,
I
<9
5:),5'38 0
, 37 lie..
~ 5~
'-? ,.
Q
-I' '
~.
,
I
I
/
/
)
, ' ,0
\
'¢
I
r0 w
N 0
I
I <0
r0 (\j
I
N 0
0
W z
Z
, , ,
-----~
,
/
/
o
/
/
/
/
/
,
/
/
/
25A
475"
TRACT
MONSTER
§ 8G -.55 'II
RD
.3/3 -4-8
---------
\
/
/
/
/
/ ''\ ---------------' --_. --------
24
.s
TRACT
/
\
"
, ,.
)'
,
I
.f) ,
,
•
.,.., ... __ -1'==-
23
I
I ' I oil ./ ~' , ./
'/ --t--_
f' _________________ I'l B i" -~'b -.A4\I'''''--"--
/
/
/
/
--.. -" .. ........ 'j' ~
-'" ''t j ,
" .
I
/
/
/
•
/
/
/
/
/
.......
I
I
I I
.......
\
\
\
\
\
\
/
I
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
)
/
'j
/
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
\1,.1. " , .
, 't J,:I,T i
, , .,
,.
, ,
,
, .
• I . ,
\
)
}
I'
f1,
I I
It II ; ~ ':l \ ;:1, J'~
, ; II
r -! ;,
I.
r'l i"
b
, '
I> 0 , :
i,
I{ ,
,
1)1 I
1 'I I
, I'
I ' I i: : ,
, ,
t I
,
,
, ,
, , ,
I i
1 ,
,
, I , I , , , ,
i I
, I '
: , , , , ,
, ' ' ,
Ii I:
, ' I ' ,
I I', L 1 ! 11 ,I ,
,
i I I, 'I , ,
, I ,
: !
I I
, I , I '
; I i
~ I
j I
: I I,
I I,
II:
I
,~~
I ,
I ,
/
'I, I
-"-'" J "'" ~
r / '" <:)
• / c" ,
/ ......... " -~~
/
I
/
1 ' ,
o
\
I 1 \ ,
/ .
I
/
f
..... ' , ';0(.; •
2·
I '
~
I
r0
0J
I
r<>
0J
W
Z
r--l~f~----
\
! r'~ :-') . -C'r,~
I
-L. , ' "') '"" ,.) I I
i~\ I 1 l~ I ,...)
\ PU.\ \1 1\l1j\!':' :)t p r
-~---------------
--
/
/
/
/
TRACT 29
TRACT 30
~I
RD sW /5 01 / e9!J _.--,,..,-~--C-C-~.5-/;}--I--8-4-3 + Z If D 9 :-" 0",0 /7GA-
Mlft
.y~ur (! Q/{Jm~l7ls
i '
7iP:1 til:' YIJ", ,
Policy D~~~ OF REt-nOli
200 MI'o, PAment DapartlPent R t 'Jenue South
en on, Washington 98055
/
(
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
l _~~ __ J~; ,-,~, --
.' .
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
/
(
/
/
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
/
I
I
/
" I
\
\
\
\ ,
\
I
)
I
/
/
/
I '
\
\
\
~
, I II
I
I
, "1
.' I
I
; '-
I . '
..
,
, i
II
f
l : , •• ,
" ' ,~'
I ,'",'''Ii" " '
, .,.,
,
I ,
I
I
E,
r
1,/
II
,
,j
\
I' '~
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
---~-
,
26
L __________ _
I .. I
, :
\ ,
---,
"-\
\
METRh \~ \
r ,~
~~~,,-,;y----------t---~\~-
I -
DISPOSAIL ,0.
I \
I
"
, ,
"
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.J_
I
I
5'),5')BO
! :.3711C
C',5:'
\
\.
--
1
\
------
/
p
\ ,
/
/
/
/
/
,
~
I
----
6
83 )
AI'/
I
'(J'1~tO
\\~
"t-~
,
~ \;--
I
I
I
22
.' y
'" '4 l\..-... 'I
~
~. L --,
13 4 6
1
,.26 ----}I----------__
1 ~ Nt/I '<:::-, ::<";-;;:CLI:-:'-.::'------" N 67· 2_fl· 48 ~J ,;':v I
I ----r -----~--
-I ,
)
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
------.--
/
/
I
I
/
/
/
, , I'
,
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
\
\
I ' ,
"-
/
/
/
I
"
/
\
, t ""
\
\
\
\
\ I
\
/ I
/
/
/
/
/
/
j
1,/
13 fO
AC
\ \ f
f
/
1\
" ,0 " ' "I 'f' Ii' \ ~ ,~
\' e
"
\
\.
t
l
t
) , ,
-------------\
I
I
I
I ,
I
\
I
A ' I-I , I
1
I ,
I
f---I \
I
\ , ,
I
)
I
<
, '
, ,
to
C\J
'\t
W
(J)
~--
, --
-,
III
'" ,...
'"
UJ
8
DEPT.
--.!"_-~'-~\:--,,---' -,
./ '<
KING
OF
COUNTY
ASSESSMENTS
7I:IJIS !UP J8 Jl'QIl THB l'I.IliP08B or
ASSlS11lG II LOCATIIG TOUR
nOHll1'Y OJ) 18 lID' GUARANTEIJ)
10 SHOW ACCURATE MEASURE~.TS. ~ --_+1 ________ 1338 a21-~--+_~-~----::~~--+---------· _-_-_"_-'_-;' I __ -j~ __ _
J s",4 jW4 13-23-4 : I
NW
L_-,ffO
7
6
"
50
wr!sf
5
4
N 07,51-02 W
"'---
",--'~------+----
z
288
, . ,
, I
.J_'-""-_
I •
I •
. ..
•.
"
10
258
..ssa-..37_;S3';
47$~?'a
TRACT 30
6
:1/
I
TRACT 29 RENTON
,;.Ie7~3a-/oe
'2~4. 82
~
• '" I
I 'i:
"
/8<& (~
I
I
I
I •
11)!JJ /" ----'1;'---
*~I+-+---,----------r-----__ .346 28 ----It---------__ _ 7"
'--------~7_N 87-26-48 W
IZ 7174-e""
,I ,
• ••• I
I II j 1 I ,
CONO.
'.
2
3
16
I I
17
TRACT
o z
~r
..J
..J
W z
3: o cr
III
w
....
A
-4
'" "' ... ~-----~ 10
---
• ..
UJ
"' '" ---------11----------)8
I ' 8
9\8800
122/98 -102
z
I~
,...
'" ,...
'" 10
• ,.,...
C\J
I
F'f)
I
\
\ ,
~I
\
)'<)
C\J
, ,
DEPT.
KING
OF
COUNTY
ASSESSMENTS
~
'mll 1W' J8 roJi TIm PUiPOSB 0'
ASSIS'!llBG II LOCA1'UlG YOUR
PlIOPJifY UD IS 110'1' GUAllABTUJ)
10 SHO' ACCURATE YEASUREIEXTS.
'---,,.---------NW ~ ¥ r ---!J-------13;1882/---+---+_-+ ---------jL-_-/-__ _
5.011<1413 i!3-4 f
, ,
8
7
w
N-9-------------~----____
z
286
I '
"' ~
I'
."" fG 381 &J~ •• '
10
256
" .1'
25A
6
~ 0 R
Uil!;;r "
5
WEST
210 <:.00'
23,. , ' ,
4
'e~(<"
I
I
I
I •
?2
I 1)"-1 ...,,-
, --'/:'::'
CO ND
"
"'-0.--1'--7
, \
2.3 4060
"Ol.-
_ IIOG~\?O ·tS
, ,
f'" ~, 14 ", ~ -1( <.t:-. t . ., "
, .
\
\
I ,
21
,.
'~ ".
,
201,
"
" " . I '
\
'I
>f<:H---:"~-,..L.: --~--------------.346,28 ----l\---------__ _
-N 87-26."48 W 11:71 74-Ei-"" !
, ~, NW 24-~3-tJ.
" • , ,
, ,
I" ,.
I, ,
• h
'.
15
'~
I
1 , I
I
, ,
: I
I '
I ". ,
: I
• " j, 'I
19
..
'. , !
16
,
, ,
" " • '<
-, ,~
"
sw
,
, .. ~ il '" j , ,
18
\
. -
\
0,0
TRA';T
MAP Rev
v
o
""
s
3 -23
ALE· /" = /00'
-4
---
~r ,
-' -' w z :;:
o
0:
III
uJ
v
A
w
IX)
'" --~1~------------___ ,m ~ '8
--
9\8800
122/98~I02
NTER VoI-CE
,',
z
"-N
"-N
'"
i-
1185
w v:
I
" '''-
-----"
}40 0 "-,,0 A~ "-
f)1? "
v
"-\
---~~
--,jl ~
"5<>
23 \ ,
\
\
I
/
! ':"" :I~~~:jfl'r""
I --r_c.. f
I
I ,
\ , \---
\
, , i
,
'~, I
o
26
~l£ II
I ' I -1 ... I f 1
£j9i5~Bd
I ::;7 Ar:_
C/5 ':l
,
,\
,
I
100\'
"
~ ~
;;r
~
/
/
!
/
/
/
I
/
/
~o
/
,
o
co, ~ ~ ~ 7<.
~ 'Eo
" -:jO '" ~
/
/
/
, ,
, ,
r
I ,
, r .,
" r
, I
I
, I
I
I
,
,
"' ,
,
"
'.
, '
-t-\
//$ 30
TRACT 29
d
"
~-
, , 33
I I /
r
22
WEST
zlo (,'3
23
+
r~ ,,,_,:,'-, ' ,
_l:.\,,~
,
, '
1
l
I _____________ 1
,
"
"
,
c,
, I ,
I' '-, I 1
I
, ,
l
I I ,
I
II
J I
l
, I
I :
\