HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 5099 Amends ORD 4498
Amended by ORD 5181 , 5440
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 9 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO COMPLY WITH THE
MANDATED 2004 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REVIEW AND
UPDATE, AND ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT, MAPS
AND DATA IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton has heretofore adopted and filed a
"Comprehensive Plan" and the City Council of Renton has implemented and amended said
"Comprehensive Plan" from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports
and records; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rentoq pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management
Act, has been required to undertake a major update to its Comprehensive Plan; and
WflEREAS, the City established a public participation program pursuant to RCW
36.70A.130(2) and provided notice of the update process pursuant to RCW 36.70A.035;
provided for early and continuous public participation (RCW 36.70A.140) by publishing a
meeting schedule; provided updates to the schedule on public television; convened a Housing
Task Force; held a developers focus group on single family development issues; held public
workshop sessions with the Planning Commission and televised workshop sessions with the
Council Committee of the Whole during the period from January to September, 2004; and held
two public open houses on July 27 and August 17, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City Council updated its vision and mission statements and adopted
Business Plan goals, and provided policy direction for the future development of Renton as a
compact urban city with quality residential neighborhoods and employment opportunities; and
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5 09 9
WHEREAS, the City conducted review of the entire Comprehensive Plan and
development regulations, performed analysis of needed revisions based on Growth Management
Act compliance, and developed a work program to implement updated GMA requirements and
policy updates consistent with the City's adopted Vision and Mission statements by reviewing
the following topics: urban densities, urban growth areas, critical areas, natural resource lands,
essential public facilities, affordable housing, transportation policies, levels of service and
concurrency, public facilities, shorelines, and new GMA mandates; and
WHEREAS, the City considered the following data: population forecasts prepared by the
Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) and the Puget Sound Regional
Council, target allocations established by the Growth Management Planning Council, City of
Renton Buildable Lands data, Renton Housing Task Force Final Report and Recommendations,
the Renton Airport Compatible Land Use Plan Report and Recommendations, Countywide
Planning Policies adopted by the Growth Management Planning Council, updated Renton
Transportation forecast and level of service data, updated Renton Parks level of service data, and
updated Renton Utilities Services data; and
WHEREAS, the City has provided opportunity for the public to comment on the review
and suggest needed revisions of the plan and regulations, and has held public hearings on
September 21 and September 28, 2004, on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations
to the City Council, including revising policies and implementing development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, after due consideration of the testimony
and evidence before it, that specific policies within the Housing, Land Use, Transportation,
2
ORDiNANCE NO. 5 0�9
Utilities, Capital Facilities, and Environment and Economic Development Elements of the
Cornprehensive Plan required updating,and that three new Elements,
1) Comrnunity Design, 2) Human Services, and 3) Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails,
were desirable to meet the policy objectives of the City as articulated in its adopted Vision and
Mission statement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed revisions to the Environment Element and specific policies
needed for consistency between the Critical Area and Shorelines amendments and Land Use,
Transportation, Utilities, and Economic Development Elements policies were prepared as set
forth in the work pragram, but can not be included in this action because the recommendations
are included in an appeal of the City's SEPA determination of the Critical Areas and Best
Avaiiable Science portions of the required Growth Management Act update, and wili be
reviewed and adopted by separate public process upon resolution of the appeal, and the public
hearing is anticipated to occur by March, 2005;and
WHEREA5, the current adopted Environment Element is an optionai element under the
GMA, and the curre�nt Critical Areas ordinance adapted by Ordinance 4835 was prepared with
Best Available Science documentation in 2000, and both of these documents provide sufficient
policy direction to sustain internal consistency required in RCW 36.74A.040 and 36.70A.070 for
the pwrposes of reviewing and adopting the remaining nine Elements of the Comprehensive Plan
by the deadline established in RCW 36.'70A.130(4);
NQW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI� CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The Renton City Council finds that:
1) The City followed its established pubIic participat�an pmgram;
3
ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 9 9
2) Revisions are needed to the Comprehensive Plan;
3) The City has conducted its seven-year update requirement under RCW
36.70A.130 for all portions of the Plan except the portions of the work program needed to
implement the Critical Areas, Shorelines and Best Availabie Science review;
4) All policies within these Elements were reviewed and those policies that remained
without amendment are found to be in compliance with the Growth Management Act, as
amended;
5) All modified and revised Elements of the Comprehensive Plan are internally
consistent and provide sufficient capacity of land at urban densities and sufficient levels of
service to comply with Countywide Planning Policies and the 20 year population forecast from
the Offce of Financial Management, and comply with the Growth Management Act, as
amended; and
6) In compliance with the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.215), the
City of Renton determined the actual density of new housing development approved during the
Buildable Lands review period and found that density to be consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION II. The Comprehensive Plan, and maps, data and reports in support of
the Comprehensive Plan are hereby modified, amended and adopted as said Comprehensive
Plan, and consist of the following elements: Exhibit A, Comprehensive Plan Introduction;
Exhibit B, Vision; Exhibit C, Capital Facilities; E�ibit D, Community Design; Exhibit E,
Economic Development; E�ibit F, Environment; Exhibit G, Housing; Exhibit H, Human
Services; Exhibit I, Land Use and Land Use Map; Exhibit J, Parks, Recreation, Open Space and
4
ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 9 9
Trails; Exhibit K, Transportation; and Exhibit L, Utilities, and are incorporated herein as if fully
set forth.
SECTI4N III. The Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic
Planning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said
City's Comprehensive Plan and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the
aforementioned 2004 updates.
SECTION IV. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as
provided by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of
the City Clerk of the City of Renton.
SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and
five days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COLTNCII,this lst day of November , 2004.
��h��i .S. ��z�e��
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this lst day of November , 2004.
-��,,, ���tr�e�'�, ' ��.�
Kathy I�eolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Approv s to form:
rence J. Warre , rty Attorney
DateofPublication: i 1/��2004 (summary)
ORD.113 9:10/13/04:ma
5
ORDINANCE NO. 5099 Exhibit �f�'
CITY OF RENTON INTR011UCTION
Added 10-25-04
RENTON
ENVISIONING OUR CITY
Introduction
Some cities are locked in time, inhospitable to change,but the City of Renton is not such
a place. The engineered disappearance of the Black River, a major waterway to the
earliest community, and the economic downturn that resulted in the closing of Renton's
timber mill and coal mines, once thriving industries, are but a few examples of the
evolution of Renton. Strategic planning announced by the Boeing Company, a primary
industry for more than half the City's lifetime,will bring economic diversification and
physical modification to the City.
Until the mid-twentieth century, the Renton community took change as it came and coped
with its consequences as they arose. In 1965, however, "planning for the future"was
initiated with the adoption of the City's first Comprehensive Plan.
Twenty-five years later, major evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan was initiated. It
culminated in the first comprehensive plan to meet the requirements of the 1990 Growth
Management Act(GMA). Periodic review of Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,
mandated by GMA,provides the City with the opportunity to factor in changes in the
community and make adjustments to reflect the objectives of the administration.
The foundation of the Comprehensive Plan is a"Vision" of how Renton will look and
function in the future, a"Mission"that states the responsibility for meeting the Vision,
and"Business Plan Goals"that delineate how the Mission can be met. The implemented
Comprehensive Plan, associated Land Use Map, Zoning, Development Standards, and
programmatic plans for transportation, utilities, housing, and parks and recreation
facilities will result in a fully realized Vision of the City.
i-�
CITY OF RENTON VISICEN ORDINANCE NO. 5Q99 Exhibit ��'►�
Rev. 11-Oi-04
v1S1011
The Vision for the City is simply stated—"Rentan: A world-class city where people
choose to live,wark, and play." These few wards are intended to provide a
representation of how the City views itself at the present time and into the future. The
words communicate both truths about, and hopes for, the City of Renton.
Renton meets a humanistic interpretation of"warlc�class,"that is, a city that has a quality
aflife enjoyed by its citizens. Renton has a quality of life af the highest caiiber.
The Vision words, "live, work, and play," stand for much more—
• A cammunity that is healthy and safe, that has cahesive, ��ell-established
neighborhoods and a grawing diversity of housing to match the diversity af the
population with its various needs and wants
• A working town with a full spectrum af employment opportunities for all
ecanomic segments, regardless of education, age, gender, or ethnic arigin
• A regianal center for active and passive recreation that features access for all to a
healthy river, a clean lake, and clear rnountain views to enhance the experience
Rentan has a city government,business community, and citizens infused with a
passionate belief that it is the best place ta be. They also have the will, desire, and
resources to nurture the qualities that make it that and ta make it even better in the future.
That is the Vision.
The Renton Mission states, unequivacally, the responsibility of the City, "in partnership
with residents, businesses, and schoals"to take the steps necessary to fulfill the Vision.
These include:
� Praviding a heatthy atmosphere to live and raise families,
• Encouraging responsible growth and pramoting econornic vitality,
• Creating a positive community work environment, and
• Meeting service demands through innovation and commitment to excellence.
The Business Plan Goals> with the Vision and Mission, forrn the basis far City objectives
and palicies. The Goais are adopted annually by th�City Cauncil. Each year objectives
and implementing policies of the Camprehensive Pian are checked against current gaals
and objectives. The resulting adjustments are formed inta annual amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan.
Current policies of the Comprehensive Plan direct future growth to the Urban Center, the
core of an economically healthy, working city, and ta mixed-use areas created outside of
the downtawn. Althaugh densities of development are based on user preference and
II-1
CITY OF RENTON VISION ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
market factors, policies encourage maximum land efficiency, even outside the Urban
Center, and strive for development that is more intense than typical "suburban"
prototypes.
Ideally, the mixed-use areas will result in a reduction of transportation impacts within the
City by allowing residents to work and shop close to where they live, in both new and
well-established neighborhoods, thereby providing alternatives to single-occupant
vehicles, and maintaining a balance between parking supply and demand.
To further the goal of a more compact city, and still maintain the balance between single-
and multi-family housing, there is an objective to increase the supply of single-family
housing through infill development. Some of this single-family infill will occur in newly
annexed areas of the City, as a way to meet the desired single/multi-family housing mix
and provide efficient urban services. There is, however, a corresponding objective to
restrict expansion of traditional multi-family housing in outlying areas and channel
mixed-use/multi-family into the Urban Center and mixed-use areas. By this means,
sufficient land capacity to accommodate future growth, including Renton's share of
projected regional housing needs,will be ensured while maintaining the quality of life in
both new and established neighborhoods.
A significant characteristic of the neighborhoods of Renton is their multi-level diversity.
Most neighborhoods include households that vary from one another in age range or
generation, economic level, and place of origin or nationality. In order to respect and
protect this quality, the City must allow for a full range of housing types to accommodate
the diverse population, from larger, "move up"homes to smaller scale single-family,
multi-family, and condominium developments, as well as to traditional single-family
houses.
A goal is to enhance the present character of the City and improve the quality of life. This
must be done on several levels. On a community level, City policies support�activities
that strengthen neighborhood cohesiveness. The er�ergy of a neighborhood that strives
for a greater"sense of community"by meeting and working together can lead to
amenities that make the area more attractive or improve its function as a neighborhood
center. The result is a better place to live, work, and play.
On a project level, high quality is a function of development standards. On the broadest
level, the City policies ensure that urbanization, economic development, and natural area
protection are balanced.
The unique setting of the City of Renton was recognized as "advantageous" from its
earliest days. Its situation on the shore of Lake Washington, its hilltop views of the
expanses of the lake, Mt. Rainier, the Cascades and Olympic Mountains, tree shrouded
slopes, natural wildlife corridors, valley neighborhoods, and the clear water of the Cedar
River and the many creeks and streams that run through the City are deeply appreciated
by its residents. There is an abiding commitment to protect, restore, and enhance
environmental quality within the City. Likewise, there is a desire to ensure quality parks
II-2
CITY OF RENTON VISION ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
and adequate open space within this environment to meet the recreational needs of
residents.
It is understood that, with other factors, the quality of the environment is dependent on
the reliability and efficiency of existing utility systems, in order to protect the public
health and safety and minimize impacts. High levels of service are maintained, while the
cost of implementation is shared in an equitable manner.
Basic to Renton's Vision is the concept that urban living provides both choice and
balanced opportunities for residents; employment and housing, recreation and religion,
goods and services, all available in the community.
To this end, the City has a responsibility to ensure availability of adequate land capacity
so that both the employment and economic base can be expanded and diversified.
Policies encourage expansion of development in the Valley and redevelopment within the
Urban Center to broaden the City's employment and economic base.
Fundamental to the Vision is a revitalized Downtown Core, within the Urban Center, that
functions as a living/working/entertainment area for both the community as a whole
and for a"24 hour powntown population."The City will continue to work to bring a
balance of uses, consisting of retail and other commercial, office, light industrial, and
residential into the Downtown.
Redevelopment of the south Lake Washington neighborhood, within the "Urban Center—
North,"will contribute to the renewed vitality of the Downtown Core. The Urban Center-
North, used for heavy industrial manufacturing and associated parking for more than 60
years, offers the potential for an expanded Urban Center that will become a regional
focus.
The City of Renton's Vision is ambitious and far-sighted. It is the underlying structure
for policies that strengthen the character of a City that entered its second century with
renewed energy, ready to capitalize on fresh opportunities.
II-3
ORDII�i:iY�C'; i:�`�. 5039
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ,
Rev.ll-Ol-o4 Exhibit `C'
CAPITAL FACILTIES ELEMENT
2005 to 2010
GOAL
Develop and implement the capital facilities plan for the City of Renton.
III-1
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAPITAL USE FACILITIES
GrowthManagement Act....................................................................................................................................................III-4
GrowthProjections.............................................................................................................................................................III-5
CapitalFacilities Plan Policies............................................................................................................................................III-7
TransportationCapital Facilities Plan.................................................................................................................................III-8
WaterCapital Facilities Plan.............................................................................................................................................III-16
WastewaterCapital Facilities Plan....................................................................................................................................III-21
Surface Water Utility Capital Facilities Plan....................................................................................................................III-25
Park,Recrearion and Open Space.....................................................................................................................................III-31
PublicSafety Capital Facilities Plan.................................................................................................................................III-43
FireCapital Facilities Plan................................................................................................................................................III-44
Economic DevelopmenbAdministration...........................................................................................................................III-48
III-2
.
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Purpose
The purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan is:
• to identify the new or expanded public facilities that will be needed to accommodate--at an established level
of service--the growth projected to occur within the City of Renton in the first six years of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
• to identify the sources of public financing far these public facilities.
Methods and Process
The Capital Facilities Plan relies heavily on the analyses and policies presented in the other seven elements of
the Comprehensive Plan as well as in the Fire Deparirnent Master Plan, Comprehensive Park, Recreation and
Open Space Plan,Long Range Wastewater Management Plan,Annual Capital Improvements Plan. For detailed
information and explanations concerning growth projections, land use determinations, existing facilities, level of
service,etc.,the reader must consult these documents. The Capital Facilities Plan incorparates by reference the
information and analyses presented in these other documents and the annual updates to these plans concerning
existing facilities and level of service standards.
Based on these other documents,the Capital Facilities Plan establishes policies for determining which public
facilities should be built and how they should be paid for, and presents a six-year plan for the use of public funds
toward building and funding the needed capital facilities. The process for arriving at the six-year plan involved
identifying existing facilities and level of service standards and then applying the projected growth in residential
population and employment to identify the needed capital facilities. The timing of the facilities was established
through a combination of the requirements of the city's concurrency policy and the length of time it takes to
implement the needed facility.
Type and Providers of Capital Facilities
For the purposes of complying with the requirements of the GMA,the Capital Facilities Plan proposes a six-year
plan for the following capital facilities and providers:
transportation City of Renton
domestic water City of Renton
sanitary sewer City of Renton
surface water City of Renton
parks facilities City of Renton
fire City of Renton
police City of Renton
economic development City of Renton
III-3
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT
REQUIREMENTS
Passed by the legislature in 1990,the Growth Management Act establishes planning goals as well as speci�c
content requirements to guide local jurisdictions in the development and adoption of comprehensive plans.
One of the thirteen planning goals stated in the Act is to:
Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to
serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without
decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (RCW 36.70A.020(12))
To this end,the Act requires that each comprehensive plan contains:
A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a)An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by
public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b)a forecast of the future
needs for such capital facilities; (c)the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital
facilities; (d)at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding
capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and(e)a requirement to
reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of ineeting existing needs and to ensure that
the land use element,capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan
element are coordinated and consistent. (RCW 36.70A.070(3))
With respect to transportation facilities,the Act is more specific,requiring that:
...transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made
concurrent with the development and defining"concurrent with development" to mean "that
improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development,or that a financial commitment is in
place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years." (RCW 36.70A.070(6))
The Act also requires that:
...cities shall perform their activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with their
comprehensive plans. (RCW 36.70A.120)
Administrative Regulations(WAC 365-195)
In support of the GMA legislation, state administrative regulations require that the Capital Facilities Plan consist
of at least the following features(WAC 365-195-315(1)):
1. An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities
of the capital facilities.
2. A forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities.
3. The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities.
4. At least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and
clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes.
5. A reassessment of the land use element if probable funding falls short of ineeting existing needs...
In the administrative regulations,the state recommends that in addition to transportation,concurrency should be
sought for domestic water and sanitary sewer systems. (WAC 365-195-060(3))
Additionally,the regulations state that the planning for all elements, including the Capital Facilities Plan, should
be undertaken with the goal of economic development in mind even though the Act does not mandate an
economic development element for the plan. (WAC 365-195-060(2))
III-4
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
The Puget Sound Regional Council population and employment forecast growth for the City over the twenty-
one-year interval from 2001 to 2022 is an increase of 9,723 households, and 33,600 jobs_ Growth targets
adopted by the Growth Management Planning Council anticipate 6,198 households and 27,597 jobs. Both
forecast growth and targets are well within the City's estimated land capacity of 11,261 units and 32,240 jobs
established through the Buildable Lands requirements of the Growth Management Act(GMA). Renton is
planning for its regional share of forecast growth over the next 20 years at the high end of the range,and the
adopted target at the low end of the range. In the first 9 years of growth management actual growth in Renton
exceeded targets,but was within the range predicted by the forecast growth assumptions. With external factors,
including the regional economy, state/federal transportation funding and the GMA regulatory environment
remaining constant or improving,Renton's growth is anticipated to continue over the next 6 year planning cycle.
The following chart summarizes Renton's forecast growth,targets and land use capacity.
Incorporated Adjusted Target/Capacity Capital Facilities Annualized
Renton Reflecting Plan Planning Estimate
2001-2022 Growth/Annexation/Land Incorporated
(21yrs) Use Changes in 2001 and Renton
2002 2005-2010
Forecast Growth 9,723 units None 2,778 units 463 units
33,600 jobs 9,600 jobs 1,600 jobs
22,266 (21 yi's)
population*
Growth Targets 6,198 units 4,523 units 1,428 units 238 units
27,597 jobs 26,736 jobs 8,442 jobs 1,407 jobs
14,194 (19 yrs adjusted
population* for remaining
target)
Capacity 11,261 units 9,634 units NA NA
established by 32,240 jobs* 30,699 jobs
Buildable Lands
25,788
population*
* Additional zoned capacity established for the Urban Center-Nort:l through the Boeing Comprehensive Plan
Amendments in 2003 of 10,600,000 square feet of employment uses, 360 hotel rooms, and 3,225 units is not yet
incorporated into the Buildable Lands data base. However, transportation infrastructure planning for the Urban
Center-North is included in the next 6-year planning cycle for the Capital Facilities Element and will be
reflected in the Transportation section of this Element. Population increase estimates are based on a household
size of 2.29.
For the purpose of developing a six-year capital facilities plan for the period from 2005 through 2010,an
estimate was made as to the amount of the remaining 21-year growth to be realized during the six-year Capital
Facilities Element planning cycle. After reviewing the projections and the underlying assumptions,it was
III-5
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
determined that for planning purposes,the most prudent course was to assume a uniform allocation of the
forecast growth and targets over the 21-year period,rather than trying to predict year by year economic cycles.
Renton's growth over the first years of growth management is occurring more rapidly than originally forecast.
The estimate for 2001 was 48,456 persons however the actual population by April 1, 2001 was 51,140,
exceeding forecast growth by 2,684 persons housed in 1,177 housing units over a 6 year period(196 units per
year). By April 1, 2004,the City population was 55,360,representing an increase of another 4,220 residents and
an estimated 1, 850 units. The number of units realized between 2002 and 2004 exceeds the forecast projection
of 1,389 units by 461 units(153 units per year). Some of this development can be explained by new housing
developed in areas annexing to the City. However,the increase exceeds the proportional share of housing target
and forecast growth assigned to this annexation area and assumed by the City upon annexation.
For the purposes of the next phase of the planning cycle, the 2005 to 2010 six-year Capital Facilities Plan,
Renton will continue plan for the next six-year increment of forecast growth assuming an increase of 2,778 units
and 9,600 jobs.Forecast growth represents the upper end of expected growth,while the target of 1,356 units and
8,022 jobs represented the minimum amount of growth expected for this period.The City's population in the
year 2010 is forecast as 61,694 persons.
To be sure, growth will not occur precisely as projected over the next six-year or the 21-year period.
Recognizing this fact,the Capital Facilities Plan should be updated at least biennially. In this way local
governments have the opportunity to re-evaluate their forecasts in light of the actual growth experienced,revise
their forecasts for the next six years if necessary, and adjust the number and timing of capital facilities that
would be needed during the ensuing six-year period. The City performed such a review of the Capital Facilities
Plan in 2004 and determined that there was not a need to adjust the growth forecast or the number and timing of
capital facilities. This conclusion was based on a finding that although actual growth was higher than forecast,
the level of service standards were being maintained. Subsequent reviews may result in revisions to the growth
projections and the number and timing of capital facilities if actual growth continues to exceed the forecast
growth
As stated in Policy CFP-1,this Capital Facilities Plan is anticipated to be updated regularly as part of the city's
budget process,thereby ensuring that the Plan reflects the most current actual statistics related to growth in
Renton,and that capital facilities are slated for implementation in accordance with both the level of service
standards and the city's concurrency policy. It is anticipated that the City will fully implement this policy(CFP-
1)in the annual budget process.
III-6
CTTY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN POLICIES
Policv CFP-1. The Capital Facilities Plan should be updated on a regular basis as part of the city's budget
process,and such update may include adjustments to growth projections for the ensuing six years,to level of
service standards,to the list of needed facilities, or to anticipated funding sources. For the purpose of capital
facilities planning,plan for forecast growth at the high end of the projected range and targeted growth as a
minimum.
Policv CFP-2. Level of service standards should be maintained at the current or at a greater level of service for
existing facilities within the City of Renton,which the City has control over.
Policv CFP-3. Adequate public capital facilities should be in place concurrent with development. Concurrent
with development shall mean the existence of adequate facilities, strategies or services when development
occurs or the existence of a financial commitment to provide adequate facilities, strategies, or services within six
years of when development occurs.
Policv CFP-4. No deterioration of existing levels of service that the City of Renton has control over should
occur due to growth,consistent with Policy CFP-3.
Policv CFP-5. Funding for new, improved or expanded public facilities or services should come from a mix of
sources in order to distribute the cost of such facilities or services according to use,need, and adopted goals and
policies.
Policv CFP-6. Evaluate levying impact fees on development for municipal services and/or school district
services upon the request of the district, if a compelling need is established through means such as presentation
of an adopted Capital Facilities Plan and demonstration that such facilities are needed to accommodate projected
growth and equitably distributed throughout the district.
(See the Public Facilities and Annexation Sections of the Land Use Element, the Parks, Recreation Trails and
Open Space Element, the Utilities Element, and the Transportation Elements for policies related to this Capital
Facilities Plan.)
III-7
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
TRANSPORTATION CAPITA�FACILITIES PLAN
2oos-2oio
Inventory of E�sting Facilities
Figures 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 on the following pages indicate the degree to which Renton's transportation system is
integrally linked to the regional transportation system. The first e�ibit is of the existing street and highway
system; the second depicts traffic flows on that system in 2002; and,the third depicts daily traffic volumes
forecasted for 2022. In Renton perhaps more than in any other jurisdiction in the Puget Sound area,actions
relating to the transportation system have local and regional implications.
Level of Service
Backeround
In recognition of the regional nature of the traffic problems fac�d by Renton and the basic impossibility of
building enough roadway capacity to alleviate traffic congestion,the City of Renton revised its LOS policy in
1995 to emphasize the movement of people,not just vehicles.The LOS policy is based on three premises:
• Level of Service(LOS)in Renton is primarily controlled by regional travel demands that must be solved
by regional policies and plans;
• It is neither economically nor environmentally sound to try to accommodate all desired single
occupancy vehicle(SOV)travel; and
• The decision-makers for the region must provide alternatives to SOV travel.
III-8
� ' � � . � � � � • •
I 1•
�
� � � � ' i�
• •
11 'r ,��
�� '�
� _ ,�
• c.
�� I
.. . �ti '�r�'
- . - ��� ` �
. = -:� �
�.�-...
����� ,t,I
���i ���� �� �.
_ _ � ��
�._ � ��,� ��
_ . . .
..0 � `��"� � -
�������1 � � � � ��. �� �� � .�
. �-"""'"�„ , �`:�.� �"�....._�,
���;; � _ _ ��' � -�:
.. �
'3i ii1,� . , � ��'�_ _
. . : �
iiu iiii► Y�� �f . i�i ' ■r�..��
- I,',�� � �900 \
:I,U'-:�.�� �,��;�,.�_ '� ��,;��� �
�,.,��,
"` , r�11 "==�=►: � ' .� ���� ���;,,� � ' _
�1 = �r��:�:�--��` �.. -�� ��,��
�a=,�,�`���,,,.,,_�.� ;� ,�n���_ ���� ■c�
1► ��� �n��==fi�.. `, � ��� y
� �► ���',�� � -��
� �.� , r,. . � 1��
������ ��� �� � i,y �..�, � �
r.�►; !1 ���1 ,..� � '� �.,_..:..
� \\ 1 I� �
� 11�t � `,�,/'�w : I
� '�� _� ����. �r ��`� ��/�+'��.
.���+� � '" .�9. � .
���..;,y� ����r' ��
` l -.� �oo .,��(t �L�� ��E��R� �� �� Q • I 1 1 �'
����,�`��.i,'..�{'9��1lii_�'' "~- �
�,__ ��i��ClAe�"j �1�1�111�' ! ,es __ � � �
���e' IE-';� .w
� ���',1 ��.__-� � �ew �����
` � ,.; �,, - w: � � !�� ���
1� ���� � _�� � , .
�' __� . �,
_
,,�•"�°�"�::� �.� �� �.
�.�- ,�,
���,05`' �`.as��� �.�� ��l ��
�� „�. ����� �� ��''��� _-�:�..
_� !� �Id� �*'����.1 ��� -
��� (�3,5� . '■,.i� � F
� �, ! ����i � �aa v
5 I � ���"��1���rS � ��y� �
� � — - R' .
� ,fi, i�� `IIII��� .. � r
: .. �,
� ,8, . � �E �' � i r � _ �ty
� _ _�! ;���,���'`
r � -. ? �I��St,r,
:.na
1 �
� � �� � . _,�,���
L �� � ,��
,�_� ■■ � - -- - , � _ .
� ��� � �� � _
� -, � � � :3'T�Y.3f
r �
�, � Y .-�"�'.1�;: ti�i^�� _
� ���
'i, � � �"� ` 3
CITY OFRENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Figure 7-2
Traffic Flow Map
� -
I N y K s 6 X �
M � l�yp
� v"..�" r �.+eo
�-iso � 'N°
i p
� NOR1H +� ��M � � • T�,pe aMs �•
� rJw$ i
xr
p+t M
� a�ea
� "" $ $ :.••
•a .«o
�
.w.�v Y �uw
'°'° � Y Y '_
�' � �� � �r g v��" �
M R � � Y �
� � � + ' �� Y -
. s � L ` � � Y �� -�
Y �
i �M ��
= Y Y
'l. ^s ,.... .a � i�.n.
�oo
� $ �°° ttM w� u°
Nlplf i f � � � $ a R MI Si
lW � �
ywo � 1.«�
rr �IlM1Oi 11M+ � �� .M> ��CC
�t .M
1t IY ylMiw `
"t'� � S a�o � }
- � q : +' �"" "K a
; �*+y��, I ,.wo' "" .,w�� �
� ���
' "'� � t £_ �� CITY OF RENTON
w & � �-` 2002
� N � , � � `"' TRAFFIC FLOW MAP
� OEPM111ENT Of PI.ANNNW/9UqpWC/pU&.1[YpRKS
8 � OPERT�00115 SEC710Np��
uoo' '� Moe - N
> A Y
q i EXAYPtE
�a tr � _
.r .r w �
w w
10
R �; wo scKc r- �oo.oao�c�s
,J� `w°�.n "'" 0
•� •M 7MWSANDS OF`EwttES
MMEC710NAL A�ERACE DNLY 7RAFTIC
� � NOTE: WlER57AlE MS NID STAIE RW1E 181
(�OF 1-�OS)ARE$/IOMN AT Hµf
�_4�5 � �-405
Y
Z Y �d Y
�j � � � ,� ,.� M«�
.
• � Y <
41M
f MT H f � Mt� �
� 4 M
g
>.«o �
� i„�xP
n
b �
t I � N � � �
> `'''.
r� ,... a�p-� ,o�
� y i y
• i � y
� ;� T�
{ � K
f � s' � � � c.++ F u aom s* I CITY OF RENTON
� � � � a...�.,. � .,,e„� ..,�<,
y I 2002-1RAiFIC ROw MM
� 4 ��"Yv�����,�..
1 F�c �...�r
� I..�. 1..� .
III-10
� I � . � � � �� •
I I�
1 1 , ' � �� •
�;
r�, �' £�~ ;�� ��
_�
% I C
:" � ` '
/1 ,�
,i I.(`S
. � _ � . .
����� ,E '
r' � �
—':� � "�?,
� �
,,,, ��
�1
"��..":�� � �i �
■,..,�,,,■ � -
'1'1 ■.�.:_r r�j 11�:
�
; �
. �=1.�-',�,��y� .__ �,, : `�y�.,,,..,_
���► \ �� � � �,.
�;�����' \ c.i_ , '�r � , � � aos k �_
� ` � 1���,�`�'��".
. . „
��ti�i�i� �j : �' . ¢::',� �,
�
,II�1111 ���� _ 3 �� . 900 �� ,:
- ♦ �1��� , ����: � � � -.
_.���i �/�==�'='' �����,��-����
�I�' '� � �,��a � � �'�
. _ �
1 ,C:�:�1 � ���'�� �� �' � �
,' � �r`�i�.�.����► � �, �+��'� �'���
GI`.I�\`1Y1� �'���� �
� � 1����=_-=�� �i� ��,�,���: ����
.
`�►�11�► J����_==f�, � � �,�`��.�� � s��'� � __ _
������ �'t� �,��� �t����� �i�,,,,,,���'� -
�►� �.—'-.�\, �� ���r� � ;--=! �;,� ,e.�'�,��'�' � `�'�i�
•���� � � � -
'r'��`��:��� ���r '`s''��?' �•a��'��,��'�">'�''" �J
��� �� •.r�„J, .;�����'�1�'��`� �ti�Y� �
����������,�e��i�. �� � �
900 �r'� ���Q�t��' � � � � � �
1� •
�� � ����'��.�'r�9,g� ::��►` �' '�'
� �►i��.�,� �Q� ���■.�re ..°� ...
�"-�j�ijS'� �69
� ��i � ,�
11 � �� ,. ,. .:� �;����� � R`� ��
► � .� �.,�.�,�,���� �,� � r►
.,� �. ,�•�-:.�,� �„ ��i
- :��c� �,�.
-�,.� �� �_ p�•- ..�i
.
.� -J �
.
- �
,�!r.'`°° � ,-��,�, �,l��''��������,,`'�i�'�"
� M�I .� � '���i��.i �•.�
��r ��� m
� - ,.��i�5';��,� I� � � F`a
� `:� �,��� -��.�,.��
�
' „) � " � �. .
, is�`� ��,..
1� �
,e� � ' �� �
:1 - ~ � l -,,,,'�,� � � `�,'
, � � .. .
�� � .�l : .
�J ` � ;, �
• •
�, ; �
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
The LOS policy is based on travel time contours which in turn are based on auto,transit,HOV,non-motorized,
and transportation demand management/commute trip reduction measures. The LOS policy is designed to
achieve several objectives:
• Allow reasonable development to occur;
• Encourage a regionally linked,locally oriented, dynamic transportation system;
• Meet requirements of the Growth Management Act;
• Meet the requirements of the Countywide Planning Policies Level of Service Framework Policies;
• Require developers to pay a fair share of transportation costs; and
• Provide flexibility for Renton to adjust its LOS policy if the region decides to lower regional LOS
standards by not providing regional facilities.
The City of Renton LOS standard is used to evaluate Renton citywide transportation plans. The auto,HOV,and
transit measures are based on travel times and distance and are the primary indicators far concurrency. The non-
motorized and TDM measures assist in meeting multi-modal goals of Renton and the region.
The Level of Service Standard Methodologv
The following table demonstrates how the LOS policy is applied. A 2002 LOS travel time index has been
calculated for the City by establishing the sum of the average 30-minute travel distance far SOV,HOV and
Transit as follows:
Average PM peak travel distance in 30 minutes from the city in all directions
SOV I HOV I 2 Transit I LOS
(includes access time) Standard
XX miles � XX miles � 2 times X miles=XX � XX
Citv-wide Level of Service Standard(Years 2002 and 20221
The 2002 LOS index is the basis for the 2022 standard. The average SOV 30-minute travel distance is forecast
to decrease by 2022. Therefore, SOV improvements will need to be implemented to raise the SOV equivalent or
a combination of HOV and/or transit improvements will need to be implemented to raise the HOV and/or transit
equivalents to maintain the LOS standard.
Renton's Transportation Improvement Plan Arterial,HOV and Transit Sub-Elements have been tested against
the above LOS standard to assure that the Plan meets the year 2022 standard.
City-wide Level of Service Index(Year2002):
� Average PM peak travel distance in 30 minutes from the city in all directions
SOV I HOV I 2 Transit I LOS
(includes access time) Index
16.6 miles � 18.7 miles � 6.8 miles � 42*
*Rounded
NOTE: The 1990 LOS Index of 49 (which was the basis for the 2010 LOS standard)presented
in Renton's Comprehensive Plan adopted February 20, 1995 was based on raw travel distance
data collected prior to 1994. Subsequently in mid-1995, this raw data was updated using an
enhanced Renton (1990-2010)transportation model,which resulted in a 1990 LOS index of 46.
A LOS index of 42 has been determined for the year 2002 by the new calibrated (2002-2022)
transportation model that reflects 2002 and 2022 land use data. The 2002 LOS index of 42 is
shown above, and is the basis for the 2022 LOS standard.
III-12
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
City-wide Level of Service Standard(Year 2022):
Average PM peak travel distance in 30 minutes from the city in all directions
SOV I HOV ( 2 Transit I LOS
(includes access time) Standard
15 miles � 17 miles � 10 miles � 42
The City of Renton LOS standard is used to evaluate citywide tiYansportation plans. The auto,HOV, and transit
measures are based on travel times and distance and are the primary indicators for concurrency. The non-
motorized and TDM measures serve as credit toward meeting multi-modal goals of Renton and the region.
To check the progress toward the 2022 goal,each year the city will assess the level of service as a part of its
annual Transportation Improvement Plan(TIl'). This assessment will further ensure that level of service is
maintained for the current period as well as for 2022.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan,2005-2010
The transportation 6-year facilities plan is based on achieving the desired level of service by the year 2022
through an annual program of consistent and necessary improvements and strategies. Additionally,the plan
includes projects such as bridge inspections, street overlay programs,traffic signal maintenance,and safety
improvements that are needed as part of the City's annual work program. Projects that promote economic
development also are included, as encouraged by the GMA. See Table 7-1 on the following page for the latest
adopted 6-year plan.
The first step in developing the 6-year funding plan was to establish a 20-year plan that included arterial,HOV
and transit components. This effort resulted in a planning level cost estimate of$134 million. The cost for
arterials and HOV are total costs(or Renton's share of the cost of joint projects with WSDOT and local
jurisdictions). The transit costs include only the local match for local feeder system improvements,park and
ride lots, signal priority and transit amenities.
Having established a 20-year funding level of$134 million,an annual funding level of$6.7 million was
established. With this funding level, it is reasonably certain that the desired level of service will be maintained
over the intervening years as long as the facilities funded each year are consistent with the 20-year plan and
transit and HOV facilities are conscientiously emphasized.
The funding source projections in Table 7-2 are based upon the assumption that: gas tax revenue would
continue at no less than$0.35 million per year;that grant funding would be maintained at $3.90 million per
year; .business license fees would continue at$1.88 million per year based on the current 85%of the annual
revenue generated from this fee that is dedicated to fund transportation improvements; and that$0.57 million
per year from mitigation fees would be maintained. Based on forecasts of total new vehicle trips from
development, a mitigation fee of$75 per trip has been established.
Developers are required to implement site-specific improvements to ensure that on-site and adjacent facility
impacts are mitigated,as well as paying their required fees.
III-13
CITY OF RENTON CAPTi'AL FACILITIES ELEMENT
ORDINANCE N�, 5099
Rev.21-Q1-04
Table 7-1
2005-2010 Six-Year TIP
Tatal Project Costs
Tatat Pro�ect Costs
Prev(ous $ix-Year Total
TIP� ProJectTitie Costs 2065 � 2406 200T ( 2608 � 2089 f 209d IperiodTokai �Cost
� IStreetOverlayPragram � 1,050,002� 405,000� 405,000� 405,000� 405,000� 405,000) 4QS,OQQI 2,430,0041 3,480,402
z {SR'1671SW 27th SdStrander8v � 355,1�4( 10,000� 10,000� 10,000� 10,000� 10,000� 5,000� 55,000� 410,174
3 �StrandefBv/SW27thStConnact. � 1,745,48Q� &00,04Q� ( � 9,394,540E 28,000,04Q� 26,50Q,OOQE 64,694,540� 66,44Q,OOd
a 15R 164 HOV-�40th ta SR80d � 2,O170,392� 10,000� � 55,100� 3,680,000� 2,350,000� � 6,095,100� 8,095,492
s (Rentan U�ban Shuttte(RUSk) I 20.189� 5,004� 5.000) 5,600� 5.404� 5,OOd� 5.000� 30,660� 50,169
Ee �Transit Prognm � 32,584� 20,400� 20,400� 20,400� 20,404� 2Q40Q� 20,400� 122.400� 154,984
7 (RainiarAvCorNdarStudy/knprov. ( 267.7i0f 2Q,060{ 7(},Opp) 20,00p) 261,000� 2.964.00pi 3.165,000� 8.450,000� 6.717.710
e �N8�rd/NE 4th Corridor � 323,892� 315,300� 807,500� � 5,017,000� 2,404,000; 2,t00,00Q� 1Q.339,840� 10,663,692
� 9 �WalkwayProgrem � 317,533� 236,60d� 250,000� 250,000� 25p,000� 250,000� 250,Op0� 1,486,600� 1,804,133
10 IS Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. E 7,500.040� � ( � 1,854,Q40� 14,300,400� 23,80t},OqOE 39,95Q,000� 41.450,000
17 �SR169CorridorStudy � � 50,q00� ( � � � � 50,000� 50,000
�2 �South Renton Fro)act � 156,844E 18,200� � � 2d0,000� � j 258,26d� 415,600
� ,a �1-405 hnprovements in Renton � a2,�asl ao.000l zo.000l �o,uool I I ! so,000� ao2,�ss
u �ProjectdewtopmsnUProdesign � 271.383� 175,OdOf 175,060� 200,060� 200,000� 240,d00� 200.000� 7,150,000� 1.421.363
75 �NE Ath Sf/Hoqulam Av NE � 55,10U� 344,900� � � ( � � 344,904� 44Q,OOq
� 1a �RaiNarAv-SW7thto4thPl � $O,OOOJ 585,000� 2,150,q00� 855,000� f � � _ 3,590,000� 3,670,000
�� aBenson Rd-S 28th W Main � 20.000� 459.400� 2,5Q4� ( � E 1 d61.904� 481,900
ta �Artarial CirculaHon Prognm I 195,308� 200,000� 200,0001 200,0001 204,0001 250.00dl 250,000� 1,300,000� 1,495,308
1s �B+ridge inspeclFan 8�Repair � 124,At'!E _ 00,004j 146,tH}0( 48,000� 815,OOOi 40,000� 30.000� 905,060� 1,025,411
20 �LoopReplacementProgram � 57.441� 20,000� 20,000� 20,000j 20,000� 20,000� 20,000� 120,000� 1�7,441
sa �SignReplacamantProgram � �a,a2�( �,sao� �,saot �,soa� �,soot �.soa� �,sao� as,000� sa,av
22 �Pola Program � 47,974! 25,OOOE 48,400� 25,000) 25,OOOJ 25,OOQ� 25,000� 973,4Q0� 221,374
� 23 jSoundTnnsftHQVDlrectAccess � 46,523� �O,q00� 5,Q00� I � � � 15,000� 61,523
2t �Tnffic SafatY Profx�m � 238,791� 84,OOOI 44,p44I <a,�l 44.000� dO.OQQ) 44.00Q� 280.004E 513.791
25 �TnfficEilicie�cyNrogrem � 250,505� 251,900� 114,q00� 75,p00� 30,000� 30,000� 30,000� 531,300� 781,805
2a �CSDBiksbPed.Canncctions ( 25,212) 54.00OE 50.000) 14.000� b90,400{ 414,000) 5.006� 1,1i5.060J 1.9402'12
z� �Art�rtal Rehab.Prog. � 537,800� 795,q00� 240,000� 205,000� 340,000� 230,000� 180,OOU� 1,390,000� 1,927.800
2a �Duva(f Ave NE � 6&7,781{ 1,258,700� 1,692,q00� � j j � 2,950,700� 3,678,481
� ISunsatl0uvalllntersectbn � 115.00OE 381,000� � E } � ( 3&1.0�� 496,004
� 30 (RRGossingSafetyProg. � 5,198� 5,Ci00� 5,p00� �O,WO� � � 10,0170� 30,000� 39,198
at IT�M Program I '1QO,filOE 54,200f 64,2041 ���I 64,2Q0{ 64.2�� 64,2001 385,200) 4$5,870
92 �Trans Cancurrency � 9,784� 40,U00� �0,000� 40,000� 10,000� 10,OOp� 30,000� 14Q000� 141,784
33 �Missing links Program ( 38,350� 30,000� . 34,0603 30,OOOC 30,600) 30,600� 30,Oq0� 180,000� 2i8,350
94 IGISNeedsAssessment I 44,8741 35,p00� 35,0001 20,G00! 20.000� 20,0001 2�,0f70� 150,0001 194,874
� 35 (GredyWyCorridarStudy � 5,460i 35.060� 120.00Of 80,OOOi 236,060� 1.810.00q� 1.020,000� 3,295,000� 3,300.00p
aa IBIcYcle Route Dev.Program � 24.798� 20,p00� 18,OOOE 18.004� 110,000� 84,004� 80,000� 32fi3OQ0� 354,79&
� 37 �Laka Wash.Bv-Paiic to Cou�on Pk � 32$,900� 79,500� � 149,100� � � � 228,600� 558,500
aa llntera»encySlgnalCoord. � 26.s�z� �2,000� # I I 1 1 �2,oao! ss,szz
� 39 �EnvlronmentalMoakoring � � 223,711� 85,000� . 75,000� 50,0001 25,000� 25,000� 25,000� 285,000� 508,711
aa (Tnns-YaiNy 6 Soas Crcek Corr. R 7,34Q� 5,000� � I I I I S,OOdI 12,300
� 41 �WSDOT Coordlnation Pro�qram � 18,857� 10,000� 70,000� 10,000� 10,0001 10,000� 10,000� 60,000� 78,851
ez E'1'hfortheArts I 2o.aa�� sa.aoo� aa,00a� so,00ai so,000� so.oaa► so,000� 2zo,aoo� zao,000
a9 �Arte�fal HOV Program � 125,354� 10,000� 10,400� � a + � 24,000� 345,354
� 4a �ParkSunsetConidor � 7,889� 25,p00� SO,q00( 390,q00�_ 1.691,000� 1,059,0001 I 3,215,000� 3222,889
� !LlndAvSWlBth-SW43rd � 5.000� 5.{�01 5.�1 1 1.814.040! 826,OQ0� ( 2.650,000� 2.555,000
4e �BensonRdS/S31stSt � 138,50p� 61,5001 � � � I � 61,500� 200,000
sT �Loga�Av Concrcte Pane(Repaie � 1 1 I ( 460,0001 i I 4&0,060f 460,600
as �Carr/MiIlSignal � � 5,000� 10,000� 20,0001 340,000� 400,000� 10,Oq0� 785,000� 785,000
ee �TranskPriarity5i�anaiSystem � 1.280,315) 30,�� � i I I 1 30,000� 1,310,315
50 �TronskCenterVicJao f 26,391� t0,400� I � � I � 14,404� 38,391
s� (Houser Wy S-Main to Bamett � � 1 � i 810,OOOI I 1 870,000� 810,000
sz (Tnns Yalley 1TS ! 54.040� S.00OI 5.0041 � ( � � �Oa0Q0! fit}.OW
s3 I�.aks Wash.Bv Silp Piane � 629,400� 10,6Q0� � I I I I 10,600� 640,000
54 �Monstar Raad S�idge � SW.�O( 12,000� 1 { � � 1 12,0�� 512.000
ss �SW 7th$tJLfnd Avs 5W � 278,577� 26,423� � I I � I 28,423J 300,000
sa (�uvalEAveNE-KingCounfy � 547,858� 1,3i1,342� 2,814,800� � I I ( 4,122.1A2{ 4,67Q,000
' ITotalSourcea I 14.836.8381 7.9864651 9710,7001 3,364,3001 28.964,6401 55,821,1001 98.,367„10p1 164.214,3�51 479.153,141
eu�rzoo,
III-14
� n
e y
� �
� �
a �
� �
�
O
�
c�
a
CITY OF RENTON �
PLANNING/BU1LDlNG/PUB�.IC WGRKS �
TRANSPOR7ATION SYSTEMS DIVISION ,�
2005-2010 SIX-YEAR TIP �`
�
�
r
�
H
SUMMARY Ofi FUNDING SOUFtCES �
�
L/� C�''
� N Cir'1
� Period � � p �
� iTEM Period 7otai � 2005 � 2d08 � 20Q7 � 2008 � 2009 � 2010 a� �" y
i I l i I I i � N
SIX-YEAR PROJECT COS7S: � E E � a � �,, a �
Project Development 3,550,900 J 683,40 0� 6 7 4,1 q 0� 5 8 9,6 00� 51 4,6 00� 5 39,6 00) 549,600 � C'' C
Precan Eng/Admin 8,687,940� 1,753,900� 297,40d� 616,1q0) 5,360,540� 485,Q00� 155,000 p � �
^- Ft-O-W(inctudes Rdmin} 10,595,242� 1,451,242( j � 3,100,0001 2,044,OOOC 4,000,000 A. � �
� Construction Contract Fee 127,099,323! 3,404,7234 T,663,000� 1,799,400� 17,877,640� 47,733,544� 48,621,5Q0 � � �
Gonstruction Enq/Admin 13,235,80Q� 364,100� 867,200J 190,1q0� 1,989,4001 4,896,500� 4,928,500 � �
Other 1,065,14d) 329,100) 209,OOfl( 169,50flf 122,5p01 122,50di 112,800 o y
SUb-TOTAL SIX-YEAl2 COST 164�214�3Q5( ly$86�465� 9�71U�704� 3�364�30Q� 28,964�640� 55�$29�904� 58�367�140 � �
� � � � � � �
� i ( i i I f
SOURC�OF FUNDS: ( � � f ) �
1/2 Cent Gas 7ax 2,100,OOOJ 350,000� 350,004k 354,404{ 350,Q04k 35Q,444� 35Q,OQ4 �
Business License Fee 9.600,000� 1,600,OOQf 1,600,000� 1,600,000� 1,600,Op01 1,600,000� 1,600,000 a
"Eiiminated by I-77B. ' ' " I 1 i 1 I I H
:G�ants In-Hand 6,529,110� 1,911,329� 2,896,933� 561,115t 392,8471 767,586) �
Mitiqation in-Hand 6,135,043� 1,995,291� 2,004,567( 8q3,985� 915,404� 342,90Q) 72,944 �
L.i.D,'s Formed � � I � I I �
Other In-Hand 8,936,B45) 2,129,845� 2,860,OOd� 49,200� 2,999,200� 49.200( 49,200 �
Sub-70TAL SIX-YEAR FUNQED 32,5Q4,798� 7,988,485� 8,71Q,70Q) 3,364,304� 6,257,547� 3,105,686� 2,072,18d �
Grants Proposed 8,726,OQq� R � � 3,026,000� 1,1OQ,4Q0( 4,400,004 .
Mitigatian Propased so,000� f I I so,000� � �
L.I.D's f'ropased { � I I ( I
Other Proposed 8,Q54,004� � I � 1,765,Q00� 3,144,004� 3,145,Od0 �
Undetermined_.___ 114,873,507� � � 4 17,856,093� 47,867,414� 49,15Q,OQ0 �
Tt3TAL SOU12CE5-�UN�EL)�&UN�UNC3�tii 164,Y14,305j 7,�$6,465� 9,714,74d) 3,364,300J 28,964,640� 55,821,1p0� 58,367,100
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-2010
Inventory of Ea�isting Facilities
Renton's water system provides service to an area of approximately 16 square miles and more than 14,700
customers located in 12 hydraulically-distinct pressure zones. An inventory of the existing capital facilities in
the water system is listed in Figure 8-1 and consists of 8 wells and one spring for water supply, eleven booster
pump stations, eight reservoirs,water treatment facilities at each source(chlorine and fluoride and corrosion
control)and approximately 283 miles of water main in service. In addition,the City maintains one standby well
and seven metered connections with the City of Seattle(Cedar River and Bow Lake supply pipelines) for
emergency back-up supply. Renton supplies water on a wholesale basis to Lakeridge Bryn-Mawr Water
District.
Level of Service
Level of service for Renton's Water Utility is defined by the ability to provide an adequate amount of high
quality water to all parts of the distribution system at adequate pressure during peak demand or fire. This ability
is determined by the physical condition of the system and the capacity of supply, storage,treatment,pumping
and distribution systems. Level of service standards for the water system vary according to the component of
the overall system and are determined by the requirements established by local, state,and federal regulations.
Water supply is regulated by the Washington State Department of Ecology(water rights), and the Washington
State Department of Health(quantity guidelines),water quality is regulated by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency(Safe Drinking Water Act)and the Washington State Deparhnent of Health(primacy over
Safe Drinking Water Act), system design and construction requirements are regulated by the Washington State
Deparhnent of Health.
The Water Utility maintains a hydraulic model of the water sys�em. The model incorporates the pipe size and
location,booster pumps,and storage to determine the flow and pressure available in each segment of the
distribution system. The Utility can evaluate the impact of a specific development on the system using the
model. The Water Utility reviews each development in terms of flow,pressure and water supply required.
The Water Utility's goal is to provide an adequate supply of potable water under the "worst case" scenario. This
scenario considers the following conditions: failure of the largest source of supply, failure of the largest
mechanical component,power failure to a single power grid, and/or a reservoir out of service. Under this
scenario, the Water Utility strives to meet the following primary requirements:
Pressure: Maintain a minimum of 30 pounds per square inch(psi)at the meter during normal demand
conditions and a minimum of 20 psi during an emergency. Maximum allowable pressure at the meter
during normal demand is 130 psi and a maximum of 150 psi during an emergency
Velocity: Under normal demand conditions,the velocity in a transmission main is less than 4 feet per
second(fps)and less than 8 fps during an emergency.
Supply: The water supply must meet the maximum day demand and replenish storage within 72 hours
with the largest source of supply out of service.
Storage: Storage volume must be maintained to provide for peak demand and adequate volume for an
emergency(fire).
Transmission and Distribution: The Water Utility uses design criteria approved by the Washington
State Department of Health.
Treatment and Monitoring: The Water Utility treats all sources with chlorine and fluoride and corrosion
control. Water quality monitoring is conducted as required by the State Department of Health under the
Safe Drinking Water Act. The City implements a cross connection control program to prevent cross
connections with non potable sources and a wellhead protection program.
Fire Flow: Fire flow required by a development is as established in the fire code and can vary from
1000 gallons per minute to 5500 gallons per minute.
III-16
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2005-2010
Based on the projected growth in population and employment by the year 2010,the existing supply of water will
meet the level of service standard. As Table 8-1 indicates,with the addition of Wells 11, 12 and 17,the net
capacity of the system is 27.07 million gallons per day,which is adequate to meet the City's anticipated growth
and maximum day demand far water to at least 2020. Meeting the current fire flow level of service standards
will require improvements to the existing water system if the projected commercial and industrial growth
occurs. In general, fire flow is adequate to all single family and multi-family areas with the possible exception
of portions of downtown, depending on the extent of new multi-family development and the type of
construction. Certain areas slated for commercial and industrial growth will need upgrading of the system.
Other improvements to the water system will be needed during the first six years of the Comprehensive Plan
because of regulatory requirements relating to water quality and efforts to maintain the existing system at the
desired level of service.
The list of growth-related facilities needed to meet all of the level of service standards and regulatory
requirements are in Table S-2.
The funds for the needed facilities are projected to come from a number of sources, including: water utility rates,
connection fees,developer extension agreements,low interest loans from state or federal programs,and grants
from state and federal agencies. The projected total revenue from all sources for each of the six years in also
shown in Table 8-2.
III-17
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Table 8-1
On-Line Supply Sources—Existing Water Supply Capacity
� Name � Pumping Rate (gpm) � Pumping Rate (mgd) �
� Springbrook � 600 � 0.86 �
� Well RW-1 � 2,200 � 3.17 �
� Well RW-2 � 2,200 � 3.17 �
� Well RW-3 � 2,200 � 3.17 �
� Well RW-5A � 1,400 � 2.02 �
� Well PW-8 � 3,500 � 5.04 �
� Well PW-9 � 1,200 � 1.73 �
� Well PW-11 � 2,500 � 3.60 �
� Well PW-12 � 1,500 � 2.16 �
� Well PW-17 � 1,500 � 2.16 �
� TOTAL � 18,800 GPM � 27.07 MGD �
GPM: gallon per minute
MGD: million gallon per day
Total annual water rights are 14,809 acre-feet per year
III-18
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORL3iNANC� NO. 5099
Rev.]2-01-04
Table 8-2
Water Capital Facilities
Summary vf Water Utilities Capital Improvement Projects
2005-2014
(Cost per Year x i,Q001
20Q5-2U10
Praject ID � Descriptian � 2005 � 2006 + 2007 � 2008 � 2009 � 2010 � TOTAL
Supply and Storage Improvements
S-1 � Emergency Water lnterties with Adjacenf Water Disiricts � � � 24Q E E f � 24Q
S-2 � Highlands 565 Zone 2 MG Reservoir � 400 � 2,000 � 500 I I � ! 2,900
S-3 � 196 Zane Reservair and Pump Station I I I 200 I 500 j 2�00(► I 1�000 1 3,�00
S-4 � t 96 Zone Emergency Power 1 { d00 I 4�} E I I I 6t�
S-5 ! Pipe Qversizing Reimbursements I _ 4p � 40 � 40 I � � '� � �� � �
Subtotal•Supply and Water puatiiy Improvements 44p 2,44q 1,340 540 2,04q 1,100 7,900
Water Qua#tty Improvements
WQ-1 � Maplewood Water Quality Improvement and Treatment Faciliry � 2,000 ( � � I I I 2.�
WQ-2 � We{(5A Water Quali#y Improvement Treaimenf Faciliiy 1 I 400 I �� i 500 � ' I � 1.400
Subiatal-Water Quati#y Improvements 2,000 �00 500 50t} 0 0 3,400
Water Main Rehabititation
w�n-� � Watert�a�Rea�acem�t I i,00a I }�ooa E t,000 j i,aoo I �,aoo I 1,�aa I s,5oa
WM•2 � DuvaU Avenus NE Water Main Realacemeat I 100 � I I I I I ��
WM-3 � Strander Boulevard SW Water Main E�ension � I � � � __50q � � 500
Subtotal-Water Main Rehabiiitation � 1,10Q i,000 1,OOQ 1,080 f,500 i,5Q0 7,100
Majar Maintenance
M-i { Reservoirs Recoating,Cathodic Protect'ron and Exterior Painting � i00 1 100 I 50 � 54 I 50 I 50 � 400
M-2 I Emergency Respa�se Wate�Projects � 50 ( 50 � S00 { 100 � 104 { 100 �_ 500
M-3 � Water System Security ! 44 ( 44 � 40 � 44 I AQ ( 4Q ( 240
M-4 I Rehabilitation of Wells 1,2,and 3 I I I I �1 I I I �
Ni-5 I AutomaUc Meter Reading Convers#on I � ( 200 � 500 I 204 I 200 I �
Subtatal-iNajar Mainteoance Projects 794 19Q 390 890 394 3� 2,140
Wa#er Utility Regutatory Compiiance Programs
RC-t 1 �JalaforyCampliancePrograms 1 i2{} I 80 ( 90 I 90 1 9p i 195 1 665
Subtotal-Regulatory Compilanca Programs 124 84 94 94 9U 195 fi65
TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMEFiTS 3,850 4,f 10 3,320 3,020 4,020 8,185 21,205
Sources of Funds 2045 2446 2Q07 2QQ8 2409 2414
OperatingRevenuesBands � 1,231,Q04� 1,112000} 855,444� 865,000� 855,OQ0� 847,OOQ
System Development Charges { 470,()04� 470,000� 470,000� 470,OOQ� 47QQ00) 47Q,000
New Revenues Bonds � ( 4,Op0>000) ( 4,000,000� � 4,SOQ,000�
� Public Warks Trust Fund Loan � 2,575,OOU�, � ( � �
Special Assessment Districts � 15,000� ISt000j 15,000� 15,000� 15,000� 15>Op0
Total � 4,191,000) 5,597,OU0� 1,348,titiA� 5,350,000) 1,340,OOQ( 5,832,000
TII-14
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT O R D I N AN C E N O. 5 0 9 9
Rev.11-01-04
Figure 2-2
Existing Water System
��:;-=-r_-;::`=.'`_:=:_:__f ' i �..�_\�__ � �
<_-<:<_';:':.<->:=_.:-:-:<-.--
���-�
�i _ _�_ !:1 �._�
f=€==:_==<=<;:<:`_->_=_;::::�
F=<;-'.�"-_-'�-==n":_-:=__,t` . ____-� � � �`\
f``:;:<::_:z==:: .-s:-__:>"' MERCER _:- �
�;;�=;'::`::.-:__;:: -__--_-_:°� :
�=r`--==u:�:..;;:-.-_-'_--=<� ISLAND �:, _- �=.,i.,��� i
�� � " - _=_- �(_:; . � .
- rrEwcAs�
�-:_`;��::'::=�__:>>:;-::-__-''� f'' - -- . �
t->:;::::;____ ______________<=\, _ _ �
�:=::::::::_ __ ___ -==-__ - - f J
�_.:::::.:: ..... . .::. , - .
.:_ :. - :
�:
� =-= .--.._.- - :. _ -, _-
�:_::_::.:_:_:::::_.:.:_:_-.::::::.:::::::� _ .
,:t�_.�_:_::r.::.::::::.::::::._-_::-_-:---_--- _ -_ "(�
___ _ ____ _______________________=---- -- _ �;
;�_�:=-_::�_-__::-�-.:.::::.:::.::::::�;:.:.::_::::�: = : = :-- �
-___---_____=________________==__--_=_=--___ _ -- - -'`-, `—�
__.-- _-- - --_=-- ---__-_-=- - �,,.
`�:.:�::_.:::':_:::=>:�:n<°:==_::j=:::::_'=_`=::--:`:::::_::: :::
���_==--=�-zr-_=-______=_---__________ ___ __ � �--
- . -_====----------------- -------= - - - �
�; --- =- ---=------ - ------------ -- - -
--_- --- - -- :::g: -- --
_���::��-
��. ------ --__=---- ---- - - =
��:: - ------=-- _- - -
.��- -- _ ---___--------- - -- -
�;�`h<';"v=v::::.::.:::::>::_r_:�_�::>:_::. �='=`--.::
' �i `tA �t,`-'V___+="__"�" �"c"'��'"_. f_'._'_'_:_:_:."_"-__ '..:
- .. _ �:j-~y:?"-_- '�-_-_---' -'" _-_""
: [1� �Sl+�t�a'' _ �'iy".�::_::.""-__-':?:-'.�"":':_._"__::::;�:?A:_'�' ��I
FJL',��L''` _ =C.RF:-*'___________ ____ _'-----' -__-_-_ ��I II •
'- - �'0; "=--- -----=----- '� -�--- _ . I\
•?.Y�;. "" '- " "'_ ' _ ' " _' �
" _ _'_` '__ I '
_ �:�:�ti;';f�'::,'.:�..�.':�":....:-���_,±,`_�::
5 . ' . �'@.=:`�>':_::-:>-::='-':'=:f� . � .
• x- ,`"G:+`_"""-_""-'"Y. " '
• �.\ ' " .6 , "Cay4r1 s II ' '
- _ • � � Ysi. °��LL; I �
. � . ''�' � � .
I l
a . ",�'.
1�� L�_� .- _ ,�:�b'w - ' _
� ' y i
. , . ��R' . � ,_
,''.,
. �,�. .�4• . •
� ' ' ,Y-.- "1.y i�._ - �K'�`
�: G3
`�V\`(j� ' � �.
� /.-+\ ' . ' _ .
,� \��� t„ � _ _ . " ^ -.
�`K�. '� _ ~ " ., ^
.. ,; n .`��;. h 4 ,.
. , : �, . :�,
__ \���' " �
+' : , �
i ,� ��'"`__"�„ , . �., ,�.
_ _ � ' . .. . . �.. . .. �.S�
.. "- �, f .,r , � � y�'.`. :
� � ` , "
; �,���� tl `� . � •. ` :S'•� « '�:�'4.
1 ��i
.. �, �i .1 ..
1 ' " ;6 "" ��'F: �:
..._ .i f �� �" `\�� ;�l . - .. _ ,_ ''r; '",
(f„� 1. ; ;�v
- !�� ..,:�:� �...,� ? .. . ' :.�,,,. ., .
��;. � � � -" >
, � • I�� ,
_ � . �+� _---
. ic�rr'r '� ' � . ' -=_
� iw� , .. ___:
.��a� `-=_.
� ��' ' , � �.: '�_:-:
F_a.
'z�3 �:_.
0 196 Pressure Zont � 495 Press�ae Zone
CTI'Y OF RENTON � 3pp p�y�� 565 Prese�ae Zooe
WStei SysteIIl P18u �il 320 Piess�ue Zone � 590 Pressure Zone
iCl� 350 Presnue Zone � Metaed Inteetie
EXISTING WATER SYSTEM :_::1 3�o Prcss�ve Zone � PRV Station
� 395 Ressuie Zone „ n:mtwon sya�m
�m ro$.a r�e..a. o �,_�soo��a000
� 435PrassureZouc w��ty��m��
�' Rw�+.. v�r �:�a.000 ��le 490 Pressure Zo� Municipal Houndaries
ay aoo�
III-20
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
WASTEWATER CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-20010
Inventory of Eausting Facilities
Renton's sanitary sewer system consists of about 184 miles of gravity sewers, 23 lift stations with associated
force mains, and approximately 3,400 manholes. Wastewater is discharged to regional facilities at over 70
locations within the service area. The locations of Renton's sewer interceptors and lift stations, as well as
Metro's sewer lines, are shown in Figure 9-1.
The City's Wastewater Utility serves approximately 13,800 customers,which includes approximately ninety-
five percent of the city's population and eighty-five percent of the city's land area. The remaining five percent of
the population currently utilizes private, on-site wastewater disposal systems,typically septic system, while the
balance of the land area either utilizes private systems or remains undeveloped.
The capacity of the existing facilities is adequate to handle the current demand. The Lake Washington East
Basin while currently having sufficient capacity,needs some improvements to its Sunset Interceptor to assure
sufficient capacity to accommodate anticipated growth. The West Renton Sub-basin also needs to be further
evaluated to determine potential capacity restraints. As part of the Wastewater Utility's update to its Long-
Range Wastewater Management Plan scheduled for 2005, a full hydraulic model is being developed to evaluate,
system wide,the long term need and timing for upsizing of existing interceptors and the timing for additional
interceptors for new portions of our service area.
Level of Service
Level of service for Renton's Wastewater Utility is defined by the ability to move sewage from the point of
origin,the customer,to the treating agency,King County,in a safe and efficient manner. This ability is
determined by the physical condition of Renton's system and the capacity available in the system. It is the
Renton Wastewater Utility's responsibility to maintain the system in a safe condition and monitor the standards
for new construction. The Wastewater Utility is also responsible for ensuring that capacity exists in the system
prior to new connections or that the capacity is created as part of the new development.
The level of service for Renton's Wastewater Utility is developed through coordination with and subject to the
policies, design criteria, and standards used for planning and operating a sanitary sewer system as established by
the laws and policies of several agencies. Those agencies,in order by authority, are the Department of Ecology
(Criteria for Sewage Warks Design),King County(King County Wastewater Treatment Division), and the City
of Renton.
The Wastewater Utility has maintained a simple hydraulic model of the sewer system. This model uses the size,
type, and slope of the pipes to determine the capacity of the each component(segment) of the system. Because
the slope of pipes can change segment to segment and flows may be merging at'branches'the capacity of the
system may change block by block. It is,therefore,not feasible,with our current model,to provide a standard
statement on the capacity available in Renton's sewer system. As stated above,the Utility is developing a new
hydraulic model that will allow the Utility to perform dynamic analysis on any portion of its interceptor system
given any scenario,to determine capacity within the system. The model is also based upon two years worth of
wet-weather data that was developed as part of a regional effort by King County. This new tool will give us
much greater ability to predict future capacity within our interceptors.
The Wastewater Utility's goal is to have sufficient capacity to handle what the Utility considers the'worst case
scenario'. That is,the amount of waste if everybody was discharging their highest amount at the same time and
the system was experiencing the highest amount of inflow and infiltration anticipated.
III-21
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
For existing and projected development Renton uses the following criteria for flow projection:
( Average Single Family Domestic Flow � 270 gallons per day per unit
� Average Multi-Family Domestic Flow � 190 gallons per day per unit
� Light Industrial � 2800 gallons per acre per day
� Heavy Industrial � site specific
� Commercial � 2800 gallons per acre per day
� Office � 2800 gallons per acre per day
� Recreation � 300 gallons per acre per day
� Public � 600 gallons per acre per day
� Manufacturing Park � 2800 gallons per acre per day
� Peak Infiltration(New System) � 600 gallons per acre per day
� Peak Inflow(New System) � 500 gallons�per acre per day
� Peak Inflow/Infiltration(Existing System) � From Sewer Hydraulic Model
� Peaking factor for system average � 2.0 X
Depth to Diameter Ratio � 0.80 (eight tenths)
The criteria listed above are based upon Table N-3 of the 1998 Long Range Wastewater Management Plan,
with an amendment for actual Inflow and Infiltration values based upon our updated hydraulic model. This
criterion is subject to change based upon the latest adopted Long Range Wastewater Management Plan or
amendments thereto. These flows are averages used as standards. Actual design flows may vary considerably,
depending upon land use. The Wastewater Utility will consider verifiable alternate design flows that may be
submitted.
If Renton's sewer system has the capacity to handle the flows projected,based upon the above criteria, or a
developer improves the system to provide the capacity,the project achieves concurrence with the Wastewater
Utility's level of service.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan 2005-2010
Based on the forecasted growth in population and employment over the next 20 years, daily wastewater flows
are predicted to increase by about 10.5 million gallons per day(mgd.) This increase is expected to impact the
entire system,with the greatest impact expected to occur in the East Cedar River Basin and Lake Washington
East Basin. In order to maintain the desired level of service and accommodate the projected growth, facility
improvements will be needed in the Lake Washington East Basin over the next three years.
Another factor affecting level of service is the age of the existing system. A significant portion of the city's
wastewater collection and conveyance system is over fifty years old. Some of these mains cannot be relied upon
to provide the desired level of service without major repair and/or replacement. Consequently,the primary
component of the six-year facility plan is the repair and replacement of the existing system in order to maintain
the current level of service. Some of the geographic areas in which these mains are located will experience
more growth than will others,but facility improvements will be needed regardless.
It is currently the policy of the Wastewater Utilities that all parcels connecting to the sewer system pay for their
fair share of the system. This is accomplished in a combination of three methods:
1. Local Improvement Districts may be formed with the city installing the sewers using LID bonds
encumbering the participating parcels;
2. The Wastewater Utility may front the cost of new sewers and hold Special Assessment Districts
against benefiting parcels; and
3. Developers or potential users will front the cost of extending the main with the ability to hold a
latecomer agreement against the other parcels that potentially benefit.
Projects that replace and rehabilitate the existing system, as well as operation and maintenance costs,will be
funded through rates paid by existing customers. Existing sewer customers will not be required to participate in
III-22
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Special Assessment District fees, latecomer fees,or local improvement districts unless they redevelop or
increase the density on their property.
Table 9-1 below lists the projects needed to meet growth,along with the sources of funds for them for the period
2005-2010,based upon the six-year growth projections and the desired level of wastewater service.
Table 9-1
Wastewater Capital]Facilities
2005-2010
Wastewater Pro,jects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
�Sanitary Sewer Main Extensions � 2,000� -� -� -� -�
Tota! � � � � � � �
Sources of Funds:
Oper.RevBonds � 2,000� ( � � �
Licenses and Fees � � � � � �
Other Taxes � � � � � �
Grants � ( � � � �
Loans � � � � � �
Not Funded � � � � � �
Total � 2,000� -� -� -� -� -
Iti-23
� A
'' < y
� �
�"' O
o ►r�
41 . .\""""'" A `"'_"i�.
h r" �
1,-- i �� _� _'�"� O
�� — --� A
M��� `� '�, � Figure 9-1 y
ISLAND �4I�� � Q
NEWCASTE$ I Z
'"'�"'`� � � �
'; ----- '
��--`'����� �` ' SANITARY SEWER �
��, -----. .,_� ��, ---,
- TRUNK LINES r
�. -, ;
_ __---- -, �--- -- �
�'� �...u� ,.�� � _.i,,,a �,n y
SEA E i----- � � l�
�" �� � y
---\�'i=---; „`\ �� �
i �
'�-----� v� r
�____, __ • Lift Stations � �
�i. Metro Trunk Lines � �
� � o
-, �' � � Ci of Renton Interce tors � �
� 3, — - - ty p � ...
A �
A \ � �p
,,,rrr � Metro's East Division y �
) Reclamation Plant �
v p
;.
�
. ....,,�,
;_, --------- City Limits r
p�
,,
.°i`'••<:_�--<, ------- Urban Growth Boundary A
• ,,,� �_
:M,.
�e � ,.,..._,,., w s. Vi
. .. `v
i:'�•�-'> �_�� _ I
'�,, � �...T:zx.� , ' ' _"_"_' "__ y�w�.� ��,,/,
,i _J �i _"_'_"—11A�
i--��:W`-_�'_� =-`-`i City of Renton Sanitary Sewer O
�`-r, � ��,- Service Area %�
_ `"4, TCHc�hL d _ d
�
,
,�, i � _ z
r.f ;' �. ,.
, 1 '��� -----
;� ��, J� � � � ,,,,.,�.;A , ,, —� � .
..
>
;..
,
.
,,. , � ,—a-----=-- ---__�_- _'
_ � �
j...,----- � - � �'# � �----� 7
;�' - n
�. /' T� � uenxawn1 ��
�h�e
;i;- ;' �; .-� ; — �;� � 6��� 12���
,
, ; --------- ; � �
�`ti s ----� ; ' .i
;:. ��, : ; ,� ; � `� � !;� � __ __ _ p
� � � ` 1:72 000
s; ,
,
m� � � �' ; �� �
�rrr � � : �
� '""°"`"`��Q ' �� Note: For graphic presentation only o
; � , �„�,w.,,,.. ; - ;,?
,------- � �--- -
,.: D ,__ � � �
�; � Facilities are not to scale. �p
�� ; � _� -
, , _ �
, ; , ; .� ;,;"
.•
' ` ' � `""'""""` � ��� �,{, LONG RANGE PLANNING
.._.' ' • I .'_.__.:_�_.__-_`__��___'__'"_.
r..____ -�--- �
♦ � ♦ 0.Dennison
-��"'"'�--� �' <- ' �, R,MacOnie,D.Visneski,D.Ellis
— ,� -- -------;+--- �F .r0$ 8 February 2001
�i,' � j J
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
SURFACE WATER UTILITY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-2010
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The City of Renton is composed of various drainage basins and sub-basins. The major basins within the
existing City limits include the East Lake Washington,West Lake Washington,May Creek, Lower Cedar River
and Black River basins. The City of Renton is located at the outlet end of a majority of these basins that
discharge into either the Green/Duwamish River or into Lake Washington.
The Surface Water Utility's service area within the existing City corporate boundaries is approximately 17.2
square miles. The existing surface water system includes rivers, streams,ditches, swales,lakes,wetlands,
detention facilities(pond and piped systems),water quality swales,wetponds,wetvaults, oiUwater separators,
coalescing plate oiUwater separators,pipes, catch basins,manholes,outfalls and pump stations. The natural
surface water systems(rivers, streams,lakes and wetlands)are shown on Renton's Critical Area Maps.
A majority of the water quantity and quality facilities are privately owned and maintained on-site as required in
accordance with the Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance(RMC Chapter 22, Section 4-22).
The Surface Water Utility owns,maintains and operates all storm and surface water management facilities
located within public right-of-ways and easements dedicated for storm and surface water management purposes.
The Utility currently owns,operates and maintains approximately 204 miles of storm pipe systems including
approximately 8000 catch basin and manhole structures, 19 detention facilities and 37.67 miles of ditch systems.
A combination of the public and some of the private storm system is shown in the Surface Water Utility Storm
System Inventory Maps and Attributes data base which is too large to present here.
Level of Service
BackQround
The Surface Water Utility's policies, design criteria, and standards used for planning, engineering, operating and
maintaining the storm and surface water systems are based upon requirements that originate from many sources.
Together,these regulations define the acceptable level of service for surface water.
The primary Federal, State and local agencies and regulations which affect the City of Renton's level of service
standard for surface and storm water systems are listed below:
1. Federal Agencies/Regulations:
a. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA):
i. Federal Clean Water Act
ii. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit)
b. Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE)
i. Nationwide/404 Individual Permit Requirements
ii. Federal Emergency Management Act standards
III-25
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
2. State Agencies/Regulations:
a. Washington State Deparhnent of Ecology(WSDOE):
i. Stormwater Discharge Permits(NPDES).
ii. Temporary Water Quality Modification Permits
iii. Water Quality Certification Permits
iv. Coastal Zone Management Consistency Permit
v. Shoreline Management Program(SMP)
vi. The Puget Sound Water Quality Managernent Plan
vii. 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington
b. Washington State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife(WDFW)
i. Hydraulic Project Approval Permits
3. Local Agencies/Regulations
a. Cedar River Basin Plan
b. May Creek Basin Plan
c. Green River Basin Plan
d. Green River Flood Control Zone DistricdGreen River Basin Program
e. King County Flood Hazard Reduction Plan
e. King County Surface Water Design Manual as adapted by Renton
Level of Service Standard in Renton
The Surface Water Utility level of service is the adopted surface water design standards which are consistent
with the above referenced federal,state and local regulations as specified in the City of Renton Storm and
Surface Water Drainage ordinance(RMC 4-22). New surface water management systems are designed to
accommodate the future land use condition runoff based upon the city's Land Use Element and the future land
use plans of neighboring jurisdictions.
The standards specified in the city-adopted portions of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual
require that:
1. Post-development peak rate of runoff be controlled to the pre-developed peak rate of runoff up to
the 10-year design storm;
2. Water quality facility"Best Management Practices" (BMP's) such as biofiltration,wetponds,
coalescing plate oiUwater separators and erosion control measures are used;
3. Pipe systems be designed to convey the 25-year post-developed design storm without overflowing
the system and pipe conveyance systems have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year design
storm provided that the runoff is contained within defined conveyance system elements without
inundating or over topping the crown of a roadway; andlor no portions of a building will be flooded;
and/or if overland sheet flow occurs, it will flow through a drainage easement.
4. New drainage ditches or channels be designed to convey at least the peak runoff from the 100-year
design storm without over-topping.
As a condition of SEPA,the City requires projects in areas of the City that drain to streams that flow down steep
ravines to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirement and to meet the Level
2 Flow Control and Duration standard. Projects have also been required to comply with the surface water
design standards in the 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington when deemed
appropriate by the City as a condition of SEPA, or because it was required as a condition of another agencies
permit. It is anticipated that the City will be adopting new storm and surface water design standards within the
new two to five years to be equivalent to the 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western
[II-26
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Washington. The update is expected to be required as a condition of the pending Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System National Pollution Elimination System Phase 2 storm water permit that will be issued to the City
for the discharge of runoff into waters of the United States in accordance with the Federal Clean Water Act.
Projects that comply with the above-cited standards will achieve an acceptable level of service for surface water
management purposes within the City of Renton.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan,2005-2010
The capital facilities estimated to be needed to solve current surface water management problems and to prevent
future surface water management problems associated with the growth projected for the first six years of the
Comprehensive Plan and the proposed sources of funding are listed in Table 10-1.
The sources of revenues to be utilized by the Surface Water Utility to implement the needed capital
improvements include the following:
1. Surface Water Utility rates;
2. Permit fees and system development charges;
3. Revenue bonds;
4. Private latecomers agreements;
5. Surface Water Utility Special Assessment Districts;
6. Low interest loans(state revolving funds,Public Works Trust Fund);
7. Cost-sharing interlocal agreements with adjacent jurisdictions and special districts;
8. Army Corps of Engineers- Section 205 Small Flood Control Projects Program and other financial
assistance programs available to municipalities authorized by Congress;
9. USDA Soil Conservation Service(SCS)Watershed Flood Prevention and Protection Act(Public
Law 566)and other SCS programs;
10. Grants from state and federal agencies such as:
a. Washington State Department of Ecology Centennial Clean Water Fund;
b. Washington State Department of Community Development Flood Control Assistance Account
Program;
c. Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board and other grants that may be available
from the County, State or Federal Government to improve fish habitat;
d. Washington State legislative appropriations approved for Special Surface Water Utility
projects(Cedar River Delta project); and
11. Other unidentified federal, state and local grant programs.
As is evident in Table 10-1 on the following page,the Surface Water Utility proposed to use all or any
combination of the financial sources to fund the needed capital facilities.
III-27
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Table 10-1
Surface Water Utility Capital Facilities
2005-2010
Surface Water Projects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
' Wetland Mitigation Bank � 50� 150� 1,300� -� -�
Storm System Improvement � 900� 1130� 800� 1120� 1580� 675
Springbrook Creek Improvements � 150� 850 � 0� ( 100� 200
Cedar River Basin Plan ( -� -� 130� 700� -�
Green River Ecosystem Restoration� 10� 10� 10� 20� 10� 10
May Creek Basin Plan Implement. � 275� -� -� -) -�
Lower Cedar River Sediment I 275I 250I 250) 250I 600I 1300
Management Program
�Small Drainage Problems Program � 180� 150� 150� 150� 150� 150�
IMiscellaneous&Emergency I SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI 50
Proj ects
�Plans and Program � 110� 110� 110� 110� 110� 115�
� � � � � � � �
�Total(dollars are 1000's) � 2000� 2700� � 2800� 2400� 2600� 2500�
Sources of Funds:
Oper. Rev. Bonds � 1490) 2200� 2300� 1900� 2100� 2000
Licenses and Fees � 500� 500� 500� 500� 500� 500
Other Taxes � � � � � �
Grants i l0l I I I I �
Loans
Not Funded � � � � � � �
Total I Z000� a�oo� Zgoo� 2400� 2600� Zsoo�
III-28
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-2010
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The City of Renton is the primary provider of park and recreation services within the city limits. These services
include parks, indoor facilities, open space areas and recreation programs. Other suppliers that provide facilities
and services include the Renton School District and several private enterprises.
Table 11-1 below is a summary of the amount of park and oper�space area provided by the City of Renton;
provided by others within the City's Proposed Annexation Area(PAA)and the total for the overall Planning
Area.
Table 11-1
Park and Open Space Areas
Summary
� Tvne of Facilitv Renton PAA Plannin�Area Total
� Neighborhood Parks 92.49 22.70 115.19
� Community Parks 130.36 90.00 220.36
� Regional Parks 55.33 0.00 55.33
� Open Space Areas 683.11 236.00 919.11
� Linear Parks&Trails 91.21 0.00 91.21
ISpecial Use Parks&Facilities 190.02 0.00 190.02
� TOTAL 1,242.52 348.70 1,591.22
Tables 11-2 and 11-3 on the following pages list the individual park and open space areas that comprise the
categories summarized above. Table 11-2 details Renton's Parks and Open Spaces by category and Table 11-3
lists public land in Renton's PAA. The table lists the name of each park or open space, its size in acres, and its
status as of January 2001.
The locations of the individual park facilities listed in Table 11-2 are shown in Figure 11-1,which immediately
follows the Table.
II[-29
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Table 11-2
Public Park and Open Space Areas in Renton
Detailed Listing
Park Acres Status
Nei�hborhood Parks(20)
Earlington Park 1.54 Developed
Glencoe Park .42 Developed
Heather powns Park 4.30 Undeveloped
Jones Park 1.18 Developed
Kennydale Beach 1.76 Developed
Kennydale Lions Park 5.66 Developed
Kiwanis Park 9.00 Developed
Maplewood Park 2.20 Developed
Maplewood Roadside Park 1.00 Developed
North Highlands Park 2.64 Developed
Philip Arnold Park 10.00 Developed
Riverview Park 11.50 Developed
Sit In Park 0.50 Developed
Springbrook Watershed Park 16.00 Undeveloped
Sunset Court 0.50 Developed
Talbot Hill Reservoir ?..50 Developed
Thomas Teasdale Park 1 U.00 Developed
Tonkins Park 0.29 Developed
Tiffany Park 7.00 Developed
Windsor Hill Park 4.50 Developed
TOTAL 92.49 Acres
Communitv Parks(7)
Cedar River Park 23.07 Developed
Cedar River Trail Park 24.20 Developed
Highlands Park 10.40 Developed
Liberty Park 11.89 Developed
Narco Property 15.00 Undeveloped
Piazza&Gateway 0.80 Developed
Ron Regis Park 45.00 Developed
TOTAL 130.36 Acres
Re�ional Parks(1)
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park 55.33 Developed
TOTAL 55.33 Acres
Onen Svace Areas(10)
Black River Riparian Forest 92.00 Undeveloped
Cedar River Natural Area 237.00 Undeveloped
Cleveland Property 23.66 Undeveloped
Honey Creek 35.73 Undeveloped
Lake Street 1.00 Undeveloped
May Creek/McAskill 10.00 Undeveloped
May Creek Greenway 29.82 Undeveloped
Panther Creek Wetlands 73.00 Undeveloped
111-30
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Renton Wetlands 125.00 Undeveloped
Springbrook Watershed 38.00 Undeveloped
Edlund/Korum Property 17.90 Undeveloped
TOTAL 683.11 Acres
Linear Parks&Trails(7)
Burnett Linear Park 1.0 acre Developed
Cedar River Trail 4.5 miles Developed
Honey Creek Trail 1.0 miles Developed
Springbrook Trail 2.0 miles Developed
S.W. 16`�'Trail .5 miles Developed
Garden/16"'/Houser 1.0 miles Developed
Lake Washington Blvd 1.5 miles Developed
TOTAL 10.5 Miles. 1 Acre
Suecial Use Parks&Facilities(10)
Boathouse 4,242 s.£ Developed
Carco Theatre(310 seats) 11,095 s.f. Developed
Community Garden/Greenhouse .46 acres Developed
Highlands Neighborhood Center 11,906 s.£ Developed
Maplewood Golf Course 190 acres Developed
Maplewood Golf Course/Restaurant/Pro Shop 15,508 s.f. Developed
Maplewood Golf Course Driving Range 11,559 s.£ Developed
North Highlands Neighborhood Center 4,432 s.£ Developed
Renton Community Center 36,000 s.£ Developed
Renton Senior Activity Center 18,264 s.£ Developed
Veterans Memorial Park 0.2 acres Developed
TOTAL 181,825 Sq. Ft., 190.66 Acres
CITY-WIDE TOTAL 1,152.95 Acres
10.5 Miles
181,825 Square Feet
III-31
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Table 11-3
Public park and open space areas in Renton's Proposed Annexation Areas (PAAs)
Detailed Listing
Maplewood Community Park Site 40.0 Acres Undeveloped
Petrovitsky Park 50.0 Acres Developed
Sub-Total(Community Parks) 90.0 Acres
Sierra Heights Park 4.7 Acres Developed
Maplewood Park 4.8 Acres Developed
Cascade Park 10.7 Acres Developed
Lake Youngs Park 2.5 Acres Developed
Sub-Total(Neighborhood Parks) 22.7 Acres
May Creek Greenway 150.0 Acres
Renton Park 19.0 Acres
Metro Waterworks 10.0 Acres
Maplewood Heights 5.0 Acres
Soos Creek Greenway 52.0 Acres
Sub-Total(Open Space) 236.0 Acres
Total,Public Park and Open Space
Within Renton's Proposed
Annexation Areas..............................................348.7 Acres
In addition to the park and open space areas,the city operates a number of specialized facilities as an ongoing
component of the total recreational services it provides. Table 11-4 which follows lists the specialized facilities
owned by the city as well as those specialized public facilities within the city limits that are owned by others.
IlI-32
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Table 11-4
Specialized Facilities within the
Renton City Limits
Number Facilitv Comments
Ballfields
City-owned:
1 Cedar River Park
1 Highlands Park
1 Kennydale Lions Park
1 Kiwanis Park
2 Liberty Park 2 lighted
1 Maplewood Park Small Field
1 Ron Regis Lighted
1 Philip Arnold Park Lighted
1 Thomas Teasdale Park
1 Tiffany Park
TOTAL 11 FIELDS
Within the city limits but owned by others:
2 Hazen High School
2 Highlands Elementary School Small Fields
1 Hillcrest School Small Field
4 Honeydew Elementary School Small Fields
3 McKnight Middle School
4 Nelson Middle School Small Fields
4 Renton High School
1 Talbot Hill Elementary
1 Tiffany Park Elementary
TOTAL 22 FIELDS
Number Facilitv Comments
FootbalUSoccer Fields
City-owned:
1 Cedar River Park
1 Highlands Park
1 Kiwanis Park
1 Philip Arnold Park 1 lighted
1 Ron Regis Park 1 lighted
1 Thomas Teasdale Park
1 Tiffany Park
TOTAL 7 FIELDS
Within the city limits but owned by others:
1 Hillcrest School
2 Honeydew Elementary School
1 Kennydale Elementary
1 McKnight Middle School
1 Renton High School
1 Renton Stadium 1 lighted
TOTAL 7 FIELDS
Tennis Courts
City-owned:
2 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park
2 Highlands Park 2lighted
III-33
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
2 Kiwanis Park
3 Liberty Park 3 lighted
1 North Highlands Park
2 Philip Arnold Park 2lighted
3 Talbot Hill Reservoir
2 Tiffany Park
TOTAL 17 COURTS
Within the city limits but owned by others:
4 Hazen High School
4 McKnight Middle School
2 Nelson Middle School
5 Renton High School
TOTAL 15 COURTS
Swimmin�Pools
Within the city limits but owned by others:
1 Hazen High School Indoor
TOTAL 1POOL
Level of Service
Standards for park and recreation levels of service were first es}:ablished nationally based on "Standard Demand"
and have been modified at state and local levels to meet local needs. The national level of service(LOS)
standards were established by committees of recreation professionals based on practical experience in the field,
and are felt to be most useful in quantifiable terms, i.e. acres of park land per population served. The most
recognized standards are those developed by the National Recreation Park Association(NRPA). In 1983 that
organization published a report titled"Recreation,Park and Open Space Standards" that is well recognized in
the recreation field.
T'he Park CFP establishes a 2-tiered approach: 1)an overall LOS standard based on total population and total
acreage; and 2)LOS standards for individual neighborhoods and for specific types of parks and facilities within
parks. The overall LOS is a gauge of whether the City is meeting overall concurrence for GMA. The second
tier identifies areas where deficiencies exist so the City can target its funds to eliminate those deficiencies while
still maintaining overall LOS.
The proposed LOS standard for park and open space land established for Renton in its Comprehensive Park,
Recreation and Open Space plan is 18.58 acres/1,000 population. The 2004 LOS in Renton is 20.83 acres/1,000
population. The LOS within Renton's Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs)is only 6.9 acres/1,000,which
reduces the 2004 overall Planning Area LOS to 14.17 acres/1,000. Continued acquisition of park and open
space lands will be needed as the City's residential growth continues within its existing boundaries, and as it
expands into its underserved PAA's.
The recommended service levels for Renton were developed after discussions with City staff and the Park and
Recreation Advisory Committee. They are based on participation ratios by which a community can estimate in
quantifiable terms the number of acres or facilities required to meet the population demand. Attaching a
standard to a population variable makes it easy to forecast future needs as the population grows. The table
below identifies the current overall LOS in Renton and within Renton's planning area.
�1�-34
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Table 1
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) - OVERALL
Park&Open Existing LOS
Space Land Population (Acres/1,000)
ICity of Renton 1,153 55,360 20.83 I
Renton's PAA's I 348.70 I 50,600 I 6.9
Total Planning Area I 1,501.7 105,960 I 14.17
Starting below, existing service levels and recommended standards by park types within Renton are given. Each
park type compares the NRPA Standard to the existing service levels and the recommended standards. This
information is provided to indicate how Renton's current level of service compares to national and local
standards.
III-35
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Table 2
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)—BY PARK TYPE
Figures shown are in acres/1,000 population
Park and Onen Snace Areas
1. Neighborhood Parks
Definition:
Neighborhood parks are small park areas(usually 2-10 acres in size)utilized for passive use and unstructured
play. They often contain an open space for field sports, a children's playground, a multi-purpose paved area, a
picnic area and a trail system. For heavily wooded sites,the amount of active use area is substantially reduced.
NRPA Standard 1-2 Acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Renton): 1.8 Acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Planning Area) 1.1 Acres/1,000 Population
Recommended LOS Standard: 1.2 Acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
The recommended standard reflects the shifting emphasis on larger parks and open space recreational
opportunities that cost less to maintain and operate than do neighborhood parks.
2. Community Parks
Definition:
Community parks are traditionally larger sites that can accommodate organized play and contain a wider range
of facilities. They usually have sport fields or other major use facilities as the central focus of the park. In many
cases,they will also serve the neighborhood park function. Community parks generally average 10-25 acres in
size with a substantial portion of them devoted to active use. Sometimes, smaller sites with a singular purpose
that maintain a community-wide focus can be considered community parks.
NRPA Standard: 5-8 acres/1,000 population
Existing LOS (Renton): 2.5 acres/1,000 population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 2.1 acres/1,000 population
Recommended LOS Standard: 2.5 acres/1,000 population
Comments:
The low existing ratio reflects a past emphasis within Renton on neighborhood parks. While the recommended
standard is well below the NRPA standard, it represents a shifting emphasis to community parks.
3. Regional Parks
Definition:
Regional parks are large park areas that serve geographical areas that stretch beyond the community. They may
serve a single purpose ar offer a wide range of facilities and activities. In many cases they also contain large
areas of undeveloped open space. Many regional parks are acquired because of unique features found or
developed on the site.
III-36
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
NR.PA Standard: 5-10 acres/1,000 population
Existing LOS (Renton: 1.1 acres/1,000 population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 0.5 acres/1,000 population
Recommended Standard: 1.08 acres/1,000 population
Comments:
Renton has the potential for developing another regional park located in the Cedar River corridor. The
recommended standard of 1.08 acres per 1,000 population recognizes the potential for creating a Cedar River
Regional Park consisting of the following Special Use Parks: Cedar River Park,Maplewood Roadside Park,
Maplewood Golf Course, and the Cedar River Property.
4. Open Space Areas
Definition:
This type of park area is defined as general open space,trail systems, and other undeveloped natural areas that
includes stream corridors,ravines, easements,steep hillsides or wetlands. Often they are acquired to protect an
environmentally sensitive area or wildlife habitats. In other cases they may be drainage corridors or heavily
wooded areas. Sometimes trail systems are found in these areas.
Existing LOS (Renton) 13 acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 8.9 acres/1,000 Population
Recommended LOS Standard: 12.7 acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
The recommended LOS Standard of 12.7 acres per 1,000 population represents an increase over the present
situation, as several additional open space systems have been identified for preservation. A majority of this type
of land is wetlands, steep slopes, or otherwise not suitable for recreational development.
5. Linear Parks
Definition:
Linear parks are open space areas,landscaped areas,trail systems and other land that generally follow stream
corridors,ravines or other elongated features, such as a street,railroad or power line easement. This type of
park area usually consists of open space with development being very limited. Trail systems are often a part of
this type of area.
Existing LOS (Renton): 1.9 acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 0.9 acres/1,000 Population
Recommended Standard: 0.3 acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
The majority of linear park land is found along the banks of the Cedar River and Honey Creek. There are other
opportunities for linear parks utilizing utility corridors.
6. Special Use Parks and Facilities
Definition:
Specialized parks and facilities include areas that generally restrict public access to certain times of the day or to
specific recreational activities. The golf course and major structures are included in this category.
Existing LOS (Renton): 3.7 acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 1.8 acres/1,000 Population
Recommended Standards: 0.8 acres/1,000 Population
III-37
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
7. Total Park Land
Presently,Renton has 1,197.85 acres of total park land within the city boundaries. Together with another 348.7
acres of public park and open space land within Renton's PAAs(Potential Annexation Areas),the total amount
of park and open space land within Renton's planning area is 1,546.55 acres.
NRPA Standard: 15-20 acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Renton): 20.83 acres/1,000 Population
Existing LOS (Planning Area): 14.60 acres/1,000 Population
Recommended LOS Standard: 18.58 acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
While the recommended standard of 18.58 acres per 1,000 population seems high,most of the acreage is in the
open space category. Most of this land is undevelopable as steep hillsides, wetlands or environmentally
sensitive areas.
Suecialized Facilities
Below are the recommended levels of service for specialized recreation facilities. In addition to the NRPA
standard and the existing facility ratio, an estimate of the participation level in Renton compared to the average
for the Pacific Northwest is also provided. The existing inventory includes city-owned facilities as well as those
facilities within the city limits owned by other public entities.
l. Balltields(Includes baseball and softball fields)
NRPA Standard: 1 field per 2,500 population
Existing Participation: Average
Existing Inventory: 20 fields *
Existing Facility Ratio: .9 field per 2,500 population
Recommended Standard: 1 field per 2,500 population
* Small fields were excluded for purposes of evaluation.
2. FootbalUSoccer Fields
NRPA Standard: 1 field per 10,000 population
Existing Participation: 75 %below average
Existing Inventory: 26 fields
Existing Facility Ratio: .9 field per 3,000 population
Recommended Standard: 1 field per 3,000 population
Comments
Because of the extremely high existing facility ratio and the below average participation rate,the recommended
standard--while substantially above the NRPA standard—is roughly the same as the existing facility ratio.
3. Tennis Courts
NRPA Standard: 1 court per 2,000 population
Existing Participation: 15 %below average
Existing Inventory: 32 courts
Existing Facility Ratio: .9 court per 2,500 popula+ion
Recommended Standard: 1 court per 2,500 population
Comments
Based on the substantially above average existing facility ratio, the recommended standard is almost equivalent
to the existing facility ratio.
III-38
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
4. Swimming Pools(indoor)
NRPA Standard: 1 pool per 20,000 population
Existing Participation: Average
Existing Inventory: 1 indoor pool
Existing Facility Ratio: .4 per 40,000 population
Recommended Standard: 1 pool per 40,000 population
Comments
5. Walking Trails
Existing Participation: 16% above average
Existing Inventory: 7.5 miles(off-street)
Existing Facility Ratio: .15 miles per 1,000 population
Recommended Standard: .20 miles per 1,000 population
Comments
The recommended standard reflects a strong local interest in walking trails and the fact that the city directed its
efforts to other areas until recent years.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan—,2005-2010
Table 11-4 on the following page shows the projects which may need to be begun over the next six years to
achieve the recommended level of service standards if the forecast growth--and therefore, demand--occurs.
The Table also includes potential funding sources for each project,where lmown.
�II-39
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Table 11 -4
Parks Capital Facilities
2005-2010
Park Pro,jects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
� Black River Riparian Forest � - � - � - � 85 � 75 �
� Cedar River Ball Field Lighting � 200 � - � - � - � - �
� Cedar River Trail Extension ( 1,000 � 1,000 � - � - � - �
� Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion � � 500 � 600 � - � - �
� Heather powns Development. � 50 � 750 � - � - � - �
� Maplewood Community Park Dev. � � 500 � 3,000 � - � 3,000 �
� New Maintenance Facility � 5,500 � 3,000 � 0 � - � - �
� Parks Contingency Plan � � - � - � - � - �
� North Highlands Community Center � 150 � 2,000 � - � - � - �
� Pavilion Improvement � - � - � - � - � - �
� Grant Matching Fund � 200 � 200 � 200 � 200 � 200 �
� Carr Road Acquisition � � � � � � �
� Henry Moses Aquatic Center � � 1,000 � 500 � 1,000 � 500 � �
� Cedar River Trail Extension � � � � � � �
� Golf Course � � � � � � �
� Veteran's Memorial Park � � � � � �
� East Renton Plateau Acquisition � � � � � � 2,100
� North Highland Redevelopment � � � � 1,000 � � 600
� TOTAL � 7,100 � 8,950 � 4,300 � 2,285 � 3,775 � 2,700
This Section to Be Developed
� General Fund � $2,100 � $3,640 � 1,720 � 485 � 815 � 300
ILicenses and Fees*-User Fees I 260 I 260 I 280 I I 660 I
I Other Taxes � 1,000 � 1,300 � 1,300 � 1,300 I 1,300 � 1,300
� Grants ( 750 � 750 � 1,000 � 500 � 1,000 � 1,100
� Loans � 3,000 � 3,000 � � � �
� Not Funded � � � � � �
� TOTAL � $7,100 � $8,950 � 4,300 I 2,285 � 3,775 � 2,700
*Includes Parks Mitigation Fees in 2001 and Golf Course fees to fund Golf Course Capital Improvements.
III-40
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-2010
Inventory of Ea�isting Facilities
The City of Renton provides police,municipal court, and jail services and facilities as part of its public safety
responsibilities. Currently, all of these services and facilities are located on the city hall campus.
Level of Service
The police department has a total of 128 employees. Based on Renton's 2004 population of 54,900,the current
level of service of police department employees to population is nearly 2.33 employees per 1,000 residents. The
current level of service far officers is nearly 1.6 officers per 1,000 residents.
With the population of Renton projected to grow to over 61,694 residents by the year 2010,the number of police
department employees will have to increase to 140 to maintain the current level of service. It is also projected by
the police department that with an increase in the general population would come an increase in the number of
class I, II, and III crimes and a related increase in the number of court cases and jail days and in the size of the
average daily jail population. To maintain the current level of service for both the municipal court and the jail
would require an increase in the staff at those facilities.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan,2005-2010
In 1999 the mayors of the five member cities of Valley Communication Board(Auburn, Federal Way,Kent,
Renton, and Tukwila)agreed to build a new 911 Center at a cost of$15,405,519. The Board has been collecting
a surcharge on calls for the past five years for construction of a new facility. The net costs,with an assumption
that a new dispatch system is not needed,will be$12,571,343. Each member city will be responsible for
approximately$2.5 million of the construction costs. As of September 1999,the estimated annual costs of the
debt will be approximately$300,000 over 20 years. In the Capital Facilities Plan this cost is divided evenly
between the Police and Fire Departments.
Table 12-1
Public Safety. Projects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
ValleyCommunicationsCenter* I $150 I $150 I $150 I I I $150
Total I $150 � $150 � $150 I I I $150
*Cost shown in 2001-2005 Capital Facilities Plan is split between the Public Safety and Fire Functions.
Source of Funds 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
�Licenses and Fees � $150 � $150 � $150 � � � $150 �
Total I $lso I $iso I $iso I I I $iso
III-41
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
FIRE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2005-2010
Inventory of Eacisting Facilities
The Renton Fire Department provides fire protection services from five locations: Station 11 which is the main
fire station across from Historic City Hall and serves the central part of the city; Station 12 which is located in
Renton Highlands and serves the north and east portions of the city; and Station 13 which is located in the
Talbot Hill area and serves the southeast portion of the city. Station 14 is located at Lind& S. 19"'Street and
serves the South portion of Renton. Additionally,King County Fire District 25 operationally is part of the
Renton fire protection system; it serves the east portion of the city as well as portions of King County. Figure
13-1 on the following page shows the locations of the fire stati�ns.
Currently Station 11 is staffed by 9 personnel and is equipped with one engine company, one ladder company,
one aid car and one command car. Station 12 is staffed by 5 personnel and is equipped with one engine
company and one aid car. Station 13 is staffed by three personnel and one engine company and one aid unit.
Station 14 is staffed by three personnel and equipped with an engine and 1 aid unit.
The City's water system is also a critical component of fire protection service. Currently all areas of the city are
served by the city water system.
Level of Service
Historically, level of service for fire suppression has been measured in a variety of qualitative and quantitative
terms. However,in the city's Fire Department Master Plan(1987)the primary level of service criteria were
response time and fire flow.
Response time is an important criterion for level of service because there is a direct relationship between how
long a fire burns and the temperatures created by the fire. Eventually temperatures become so high that
"flashover" occurs,a process in which all combustible material in a room or building ignites simultaneously.
Reaching a fire before flashover occurs is an important consideration in fire suppression. Studies have shown
that under normal dispatching procedures fire crews have about four to six minutes to reach a fire before
flashover occurs.
Fire flow is the second criterion for measuring the level of service for fire suppression. Fire flow refers to the
amount of water that is available to spray on a fire and extinguish it. Understandably,water is an essential
element for fire suppression, and the hotter a fire,the more water that must be available to extinguish it.
Determining what is adequate fire flow depends upon a building's type of construction, floor area,and use. For
example, adequate fire flow in the city's water system for a single-family wood frame house is 1,000 gallons per
minute(gpm)whereas adequate fire flow for a shopping center or an industrial park is approximately 4,500
gpm.
The third aspect of establishing level of service is personnel. Having trained firefighters in sufficient numbers is
crucial to putting out a fire safely and efficiently. The number and training of firefighters also must fit with the
deparhnent's strategic or tactical approach to fighting fires. The Renton fire deparhnent uses an aggressive
attack strategy as opposed to a defensive approach strategy.
III-42
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
In its Fire Department Master Plan,the City established the following standards for level of service:
1. Acceptable response time is defined as having the first responding units arrive on the fire scene in five
minutes or less.
2. Acceptable response time is defined as having the second responding units arrive on the fire scene in ten
minutes or less.
3. Acceptable fire flow is defined as having water available to all parts of the city in sufficient quantity and
pressure to extinguish the worst-case�re in an existing or projected land use.
4. Acceptable personnel is defined as having five firefigh±ers on site in first response and ten firefighters
on site in second response.
5. Acceptable personnel is also defined as having sufficient personnel available through mutual aid and
automatic response agreements with neighboring jurisdictions to efficiently and successfully extinguish
the larger and more complex fires in residential,commercial, institutional and industrial buildings.
Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan,—2005-2010
With the exception of a few isolated small areas of the city,the "five firefighters in five minutes" level of service
standard is being met. With regard to the "ten firefighters in ten minutes" level of service standard,this standard
is being met in virtually the entire city.
Similarly,the adequate fire flow level of service standard is being met city-wide. Generally, fire flows are
adequate throughout the city, a long-range water system plan is being implemented to upgrade the few low fire
flow areas, and development standards and review procedures are in place which require that necessary fire
suppression measures are made available for all new construction.
Given the population and employment growth projected for the year 2010, it is anticipated that some actions
may be needed over the next six years to maintain the response time level of service standards.
In the east Renton area the agreement with Fire District 25 whereby the city has assumed operational control of
that facility coupled with Station 12 and the water system plan for the area should assure that both response time
and fire flow standards will be maintained.
In the Kennydale area a new station 15 will be constructed over the next six years. The station will be staffed
with three firefighters, seven days a week. This means an additional fifteen firefighters along with the purchase
of equipment. The total project includes the purchase of land,design, construction,hiring personnel,and
purchase of equipment. Presently the northerly portion of the area is within the ten-minute response time
standard but outside of the five-minute response time standard for Station 12. As pointed out in the Fire
Department Master Plan, a new station 15 closer to I-405 and 44th would provide five-minute response time
coverage to the entire area.
Over the next six years, some single family and multi-family growth is projected for the Kennydale/Highlands
area,as is some employment growth. This growth would increase somewhat the importance of providing
improved service to the area in the near term. Given the residential and employment growth projected for the
area after the year 2006,the importance of taking actions to improve the five-minute response time coverage
increase substantially during that period. The solution recommc;nded in the Fire Master Plan was to relocate
Station 12 further to the east. This was accomplished in 2004. In the next six-year planning period,the City
will build Station 15 to better serve the growing Highlands area. This project includes purchasing land, design,
and construction. The City also anticipated improvements to Valley Communications Facilities over the next
six years.
Station 14 was built in the Valley industrial area to help handle the projected employment and multi-family
growth for the area. In addition,there is still a need for a new facility for Station 13 due to its physical
limitations in terms of its ability to accommodate the necessary equipment and personnel to maintain the current
level of service standards as growth occurs. Station 13 was built as a temporary facility,until a current level of
service standards as growth occurs. Station 13 was built as a temporary facility, until a decision was made
111-43
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
whether to build a new station or collocate with Fire District 40. With the decision not to collocate a station,the
need for a new facility is apparent. The project includes design and construction only.
Table 13-1
Fire Capital Facilities
2005-2010
Fire Projects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Station 13 I 990I 3,SOOI I -I I
Station 15 I 350I 4,SOOI "I -I I
Valley Communications Center I 150I 150I 150I I � 150
Total I 1,490I 8,150I 150I I I 150
'I'his section to be developed
Sources of Funds:
General Fund I 1,340I 800I I I I
Licenses and Fees I 150I 150I 150I I ( 150
Bonds I I I I I (
Fire Mitigation Fees I I I I I I
Total I 1,490I 8,150I 150I I I 150
III-44
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT O R D I N AN C E N O. 5 0 9 9
Rev.11-01-04
Figure 13-1
Existing and Proposed Fire Stations
�gure 13-I
E�XISTING AND
PROPOSED a
FIRE STATIONS �_—; KCFD 2s-s
A Exiating Clty �-�
Flre Statlons � �.I ��'�
K Exlallnp County � + ��
Flra Statlons
� PropoaeE Fira Statlon ._�
Rslocatlons - !_.
Propos�d N�w K•"""•�• �'l
� FIte.Statlohs '"-'
`1
% Slatlon 15
• �
LAF�E �' j 1`.`._._
WASHINGTON j.� � _ j
`���.S �-,
i
� r
— O � I i
/ �t_i —_
r.� 1M Nly�wd� 1
KCFD 20-1 j ~ ;r i_
M� i Stali�n 12
J j
W.t Htll l r'
, \ � r'
.] ' �
� _� '� "' KCFD 25-1
—� Slatlon i t
i� �
r'�i ��•— Realm cmes
--.� iadcr caaaad
`"
a cr
�� ' MM�wMltl ��"
R�MMs NINa
•1 Tlft�wT►ih '
� v.e.r 1—•�.` .
�nav.al.l M.• � ��
I � � ��
Statlon 14 T�I��I NIII j��
� �.
i ,._.
� � �
� I . ' �� KCFO �f0-42
KCPO 40-�11/ •�
L._.,.---'.j �'�.Renlon Slatlon 13
/ �,_�
1 i
City or � ��•��._
RENTON, ���
WASHINGTON �
Soutc�: Ra�to� Flr�
Uepartmeni, 1986
ct/,5ap�, t986
III-45
CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN
2005-2010
The Neighborhood Grant Program provides $50,000 to be distributed in small matching grants to organized
associations that from recognized geographic neighborhoods in Renton. The grant projects must be a benefit to
the pubic,create physical improvements,build and enhance a neighborhood feature and be within Renton City
limits.
Funding for infrastructure implementation is provided for the Highlands Subarea Plan and the South Lake
Washington Redevelopment Area. New development in these two areas will require additional transportation
and utility investments needed to stimulate redevelopment.
Table 14-1
Economic Development/Administration Facilities
2005-2010
Economic Development Projects 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*
Neighborhood Grants I $SOI $SOI $SOI $SOI $SOI $50
Highlands Subarea Plan I 75I I I I I
South Lake Washington I SOI I I I (
Redevelopment
Total $175 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50
Sources of Funds:
General Fund I $175I $SOI $SOI $SOI $SOI $50
I ( I I I I
Total I $175I $SOI $SOI $SOI $SOI $50
III-46
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE; Li�a ��i)�'�
Added 11-01-04 Exhibit �D'
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
GOALS
1. To raise the aesthetic quality of the City.
2. To strengthen the economy through high quality development.
3. To ensure that a high quality of life is maintained as Renton evolves.
IV-1
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Natural Areas........................................................................................................................................3
II. Urban Separators..................................................................................................................................4
III. Established Neighborhoods..................................................................................................................4
N. New Development................................................................................................................................6
A. Site planning...........................................................................................................................6
B. Gateways.................................................................................................................................8
C. Views and focal points............................................................................................................9
D. Architecture.............................................................................................................................9
E. Landscaping......................................................................................................................... 10
F. Streets, sidewalks, and streetscape....................................................................................... 10
G. Signage ................................................................................................................................ 13
H. Lighting................................................................................................................................ 13
I. Urban Center........................................................................................................................ 14
iv-2
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
Added 11-01-04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
COMMUNITY DESIGI�1 ELEMENT
Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Community Design Element is to establish policies that set
standards for high quality development, improve the aesthetics and functionality of existing
neighborhoods and commercial areas, and guide the development of new neighborhoods.
Recognizing that the exceptional quality of life in Renton is dependent upon a strong local economy,
these policies are intended to further that economic health. They are based on the belief that a positive
image and high quality attracts more of the same, so that high standards can lead to increased revenue.
Goals:
1. To raise the aesthetic quality of the City,
2. To strengthen the economy through high quality development, and
3. To ensure that a high quality of life is maintained as Renton evolves.
Discussion:
The objectives arid policies adopted to meet these goals address issues related to both the natural and
built environment such as: how the physical organization of development can create a clesirable place to
live; the importance of view protection; ways to improve the streetscape;principles of vegetation
preservation, selection, and maintenance;principles of architectural and urban design; and the function
of urban separators.
I. Natural Areas
Summary: Natural areas are an important component of the community. The purpose of including
natural areas in the Community Design Element is not so that natural areas will be "designed,"but rather
so that the built environment can be shaped in a manner that takes into consideration the natural
environment.
The Community Design Natural Areas objectives are intended to address:
• Urban growth in relation to natural areas,
• Protection and enhancement of natural areas, and
• Public access to natural areas.
Objective CD-A: The City's unique natural features, including land form, vegetation, lakeshore, river,
creeks and streams, and wetlands should be protected and enhanced as opportunities arise.
Policy CD-1: Integrate development into natural areas by clustering development and/or adjusting site
plans to preserve wetlands, steep slopes, and notable stands of trees or other vegetation. Natural features
should function as site amenities. Use incentives such as flexible lot size and configuration to encourage
preservation and add amenity value.
Policy CD-2: During development, effort should be made to preserve watercourses as open channels.
Policy CD-3: Site design should maximize public access to and create opportunities for use of shoreline
areas in locations contiguous to a lake,river, stream, or wetland where such access would not jeopardize
habitats and other environmental attributes of the water body.
IV-3
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy CD-4: Development review of proposed projects should identify opportunities for increasing
public access to Lake Washington, the Cedar River, wetlands, streams, and creeks in the City.
Policy CD-5: Renton's public and private open space should be increased in size through acquisition of
additional land or dedication of Native Growth Protection Area easements.
Policy CD-6: Public open space acquisition should be consistent with the Long Range Parks,
Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan Policy.
II. Urban Separators
Summary: Urban Separators are low-density residential areas, intended to establish edges between
Renton and other communities. These transition areas will become more important as urban areas
intensify.
In some areas, natural features such as stream courses, landform, and vegetation already serve as buffers.
These policies are implemented by the Resource Conservation and Residential 1 zoning designations.
The Urban Separator policies should be considered along with Residential Low Density policies.
Objective CD-B: Designate low-density residential and resource areas as Urban Separators to provide
physical and visual distinctions between Renton and adjacent communities, and to define Renton's
boundaries.
Policy CD-7. The function of Urban Separators should be to:
a. reinforce the character of the City,
b. establish clear boundaries between the City and other communities,
c. Separate high-density urban land uses from low-dens:ty uses and resource lands, and
d. Protect environmentally sensitive or critical areas. �
Policy CD-8. Locational criteria should consider the following types of lands for designation as Urban
Separators:
a. Individual and interconnecting natural features, critical areas, public and private open space and
water features.
b. Existing and proposed individual and interconnecting parks, and agricultural areas.
c. Areas that provide a logical and easily identifiable physical separation between urban
communities.
III. Established Neighborhoods
Objective CD-C: Promote re-investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment
of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to
streets and sidewalks to increase property values. ,
Policy CD-9. Support modification of existing commercial and residential structures and site
improvements that implement the current land use policies as re-investment occurs in neighborhoods.
IV-4
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Such modifications may consist of parking lot design, landscaping renovation, new coordinated signage,
and site plan/building alterations that update structures to contemporary standards.
Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established
neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample
to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and,where practical, match existing sidewalks.
Policy-CD-11. Vacant property should be maintained (landscaped, pruned, mowed, and litter removed)
or screened to prevent adverse visual, economic, and health/safety impacts on the surrounding area.
Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged
in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established
neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and/or responding to more urban
setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development
such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site
planning and scale of existing areas.
Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with
other structures on the site and with adj acent development.
Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria:
a. Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single-story
structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design
such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the
structure.
b. Garages,whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of
development established in the vicinity.
c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doars located to maintain privacy in neighboring
yards and buildings.
IV. New Development
Summary: Objectives and polices that address new development are intended to serve multiple
purposes. First, concerns about new development"fitting in"to established areas of Renton have
resulted in an increased awareness that site design and architecture, when planned to be compatible with
the context of the neighborhood or commercial area, can make the "fit" of the new project more
comfortable.
Second, these objectives and policies provide assistance to project proponents so when planning new
development for Renton; they can be guided in their choices.
Third, city officials, who must make decisions regarding ne��v projects, can use these objectives and
policies to guide their review of project proposals.
Elements of new development represented by objectives and policies in this section include:
A. Site planning
B. Gateways
C. Views and focal points
N-5
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
D. Architecture
E. Landscaping
F. Streets, sidewalks, and streetscape
G. Signs
H. Lighting
I. Urban Center
A. Site Planning
Summary: Site planning is the art and science of arranging structures, open space, and non-structural
elements on land in a functional way so that the purpose of the development can be met,while keeping
those elements in harmony with each other and with the context of the project.
Objective CD-D: New neighborhood development patterns should be consistent with Renton's
established neighborhoods and have an interconnected road network.
Policy CD-15. Land should be subdivided into blocks sized so that walking distances are minimized and
convenient routes between destination points are available.
Policy CD-16. During land division, all lots should front streets or parks. Discourage single tier lots
with rear yards backing onto a street. Where a single-tier plat is the only viable alternative due to land
configuration, significant environmental constraints, or location on a principal arterial, additional design
features such as a larger setbacks, additional landscaping, or review of fencing should be required.
a. Evaluation of land configuration should consider whether a different layout of streets or provision
of alleys is physically possible and could eliminate the need for a single-tier plat.
b. Evaluation of environmental constraints should consider whether the location and extent of critical
areas prevents a standard plat design.
c. Review of fencing should ensure that the development does not"turn its back"to public areas.
Policy CD-17. Development should be designed (e.g. building orientation, setbacks, landscape areas and
open space, parking, and outdoor activity areas) to result in a high quality development as a primary goal,
rather than to maximize density as a first consideration.
Policy CD-18. Projects should only be approved at the upper end of density ranges when the following
criteria are fully addressed in project level submission.
a. Trees are retained, relocated, or planted to create sufficient vegetative cover to provide a
landscape amenity, shade, and high quality-walking environment in an urban context.
b. Lot size/configuration and lot coverage is sufficient to provide private recreation/outdoor space
for each resulting lot.
c. Structures can be sited so that entry, window, and door locations create and maintain privacy on
adjoining yards and buildings. Architectural and landscape design should:
• Prevent window and door openings looking directly into another structure,
• Prevent over-reliance on fencing, ar
• Prevent projections of building elements into required setbacks in a pattern that reduces
provision of light, visual separation, and/or require variances of modification of standards.
Density may be reduced within the allowed range to bring projects into compliance with these criteria.
IV-6
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy CD-19. During development, significant trees, either individually or in stands, should be
preserved, replaced, or as a last option, relocated.
Policy CD-20. Development should be visually and acoustically buffered from adjacent freeways.
Policy CD-21. Development should have buildings oriented toward the street or a common area rather
than toward parking lots.
Policy CD-22: When appropriate, due to scale, use, or location, on-site open space and recreational
facilities in developments should be required.
Policy CD-23. Developments should be designed so that public access to and use of parks, open space,
or shorelines, is available where such access would not jeopardize the environmental attributes of the
area.
Policy CD-24. Site design of development should relate, connect, and continue design quality and site
function from parcel to parcel.
Policy CD-25. Site design should address the effects of light, glare, noise, vegetation removal, and
traffic in residential areas. Overall development densities may be reduced within the allowed density
range to mitigate potential adverse impacts.
Policy CD-26. Streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian or bike paths should be arranged as an interconnecting
network. The use of cul-de-sacs should be discouraged. A grid or"flexible grid"pattern of streets and
pathways, with a hierarchy of widths and corresponding traffic volumes, should be used.
Policy CD-27. New streets should be designed to provide convenient access and a choice of routes
between homes and parks, schools, shopping, and other community destinations.
Policy CD-28. Non-residential development should have site plans that provide street access from a
principal arterial, consolidate access points to existing streets, and have internal vehicular circulation that
supports shared access.
Policy CD-29. In mixed-use developments with ground-floor retail uses,residential parking areas should
not conflict with pedestrian and vehicular access to the retail component of the project.
Policy CD-30. If transit service is available,parking requirements may be reduced or shared parking
serving multiple developments may be allowed.
Policy CD-31. In mixed-use developments,residential uses should be connected to other uses through
design features such as pedestrian walkways and common open space.
Policy CD-32. Neighborhoods should have human-scale features, such as pedestrian pathways and
public spaces (e.g. parks or plazas) that have discernible edges, entries and borders.
B. Gateways
Summary: Community identity can be effectively communicated at City and district/neighborhood entries
through the designation of these areas as "gateways." Gateways are a means to call attention to the entrance
to the City or a more specific geographic area and bid welcome.
Objective CD-E: Highlight entrances to the City through the use of the"Gateways"designation.
Implementing code for Objective CD-E and policies CD-33, 34, and 35 will be put in place within five
(5) years from the date of adoption of the GMA update.
iv-�
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy CD-33. Identify primary and secondary gateways to the City and develop them as opportunities
arise.
Policy CD-34. The level of development intensity at a gateway should be used,with location, to
determine whether it is a primary or secondary gateway.
Policy CD-35. Each gateway should have unique, identifiable design treatment in terms of landscaping,
building design, signage, street furniture,paving, and street width. Special consideration of gateway
function should be demonstrated through design of these elements.
C. Views and Focal Points
Summary: Views are a resource that should be preserved for public access to the greatest extent
possible. Focal points should be created and used to enhance the community.
Objective CD-F: Protect and enhance public views of distinctive features from public streets and other
focal points within the City and the surrounding area. Implementing code for Objective CD-F and
Policies CD-36, CD-37, CD-38, CD-39 will be put in place within a five (5) year period from the date of
adoption of the GMA update.
Policy CD-36. Scenic views and view corridors along roadways in the City should be identified and
preserved through application of development standards.
Policy CD-37. Access from public roadways to views of features of distinction should be enhanced
through the development of public viewpoints where appropriate.
Policy CD-38. Neighborhood identity should be established by featuring views, highlighting landmarks,
or creating focal points of distinction.
Policy CD-39. Focal points should have a combination of public areas, such as parks or plazas;
architectural features, such as towers, outstanding building design, transit stops, or outdoor eating areas;
and landscaped areas. These features should be connected to pedestrian pathways.
D. Architecture
Summary: It is not the intent of these policies to dictate the architectural style of structures in the City
of Renton. The Community Design architectural policies are intended to encourage design of structures
that fit well into the neighborhood, reflect the physical character of Renton, mitigate potential negative
impacts of development, and function well in meeting the needs of both the building occupant and the
community.
Objective CD-G: Architecture should be distinctive and contribute to the community aesthetic.
Policy CD-40. Structures should be designed (e.g. building height, orientation, materials, color and
bulk;) to mitigate potential adverse impacts, such as glare or shadows on adjacent less intense land uses
and transportation corridors.
Policy CD-41. Rooftops that can be seen from public streets,parks, or open space should be designed to
hide mechanical equipment and to incorporate high-quality roofing materials.
Policy CD-42. Design characteristics in larger new developments or individual building complexes
should contribute to neighborhood and/or district identity.
iv-s
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective CD-H: Ensure that structures built in residential areas are consistent with the City's adopted
land use vision and Purpose Statements for each Land Use Designation found in the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element, Residential Policies.
Objective CD-I: New commercial buildings should be architecturally compatible with their
surroundings in terms of their bulk and scale, exterior materials, and color when existing development is
consistent with the adopted land use vision and Purpose Statements for each Commercial Centers
Designation in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Center and Commercial Policies.
Policy CD-43. A variety of architectural design and detailing should be encouraged as long as site
functions connect to adj acent development. Innovative use of building materials and finishes should be
promoted.
Policy CD-44. Development should provide appropriate landscaping and fa�ade treatment when located
along designated City arterials or adjacent to less intense developments in order to mitigate potentially
adverse visual or other impacts.
E. Landscaping
Summary: Landscaping is a key element of the City. It can be used to create distinctive character for
developments, neighborhoods and along city streets; to frame views; to block unsightly views; or
mitigate the scale of large buildings. It can also be used to reduce traffic noise levels and the effects of
pollution.
Objective CD-J-: The City of Renton should adopt a citywide landscape plan that furthers the aesthetic
goal of the City and provides guidance for future development and infrastructure improvements.
Implementing code for Objective CD-J and Policies CD-45, CD-46 and CD-48 will be put in place
within a five (5) year period from the date of adoption of the GMA update.
Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in
developments.
Policy CD-46. A comprehensive landscape architectural plan for the City should be developed. The plan
should include recommendations for preferred street and landscape trees.
Policy CD-47. Landscape plans should take into consideration the potential impact of mature vegetation
on significant views so that future removal of view-blocking trees will not be necessary.
Policy CD-48. A comprehensive landscape plan for the City should include areas such as those adjacent
to freeways and major highways and other public rights-of-way. The installation of this landscaping
should be encouraged.
Policy CD-49. Citywide development standards, for landscape design, installation, and maintenance
should be developed.
Policy CD-50. Trees should be planted along residential streets, in parking lots requiring landscaping,
and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises. Trees should be retained whenever possible and
maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each type.
Policy CD-51. Landscaping is encouraged, and may be required, in parking areas to improve their
appearance and to increase drainage control.
Policy CD-52. Landscape and surface water drainage plans should be coordinated to maximize
percolation of surface water and minimize runoff from the site.
IV-9
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential
subdivisions, should include landscape plans.
Policy CD-53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways,
street rights-of-way, stormwater detention ponds, and all common areas.
Policy CD-54. Residential subdivisions and multi-family residential projects should include planting of
street trees accarding to an adopted citywide landscape plan.
Policy CD-55. Maintenance programs should be required for landscaped areas in development projects,
including entryways, street rights-of-way, stormwater retention/detention ponds, and common areas.
Policy CD-56. Surface water retention/detention ponds should be landscaped appropriately for the
location of the facility.
F. Streets, Sidewalks, and Streetscape
Objective CD-L: Promote development of attractive,walkable neighborhoods and shopping areas by
ensuring that streets are safe, convenient, and pleasant for pedestrians.
Policy CD-57. The design of pedestrian—oriented environments should address safety as a first priority.
Safety measures should include generous separation of cars and pedestrians,reducing the number of curb
cuts and driveways, having numerous, well-marked street crossings and providing street and sidewalk
lighting.
Policy CD-58. Aesthetic improvements along street frontages should be provided, especially for
properties abutting major streets and boulevards. Incentives should be provided for the inclusion of
streetscape amenities including: landscaping,public art, street furniture,paving, signs, and planting
strips in developing and redeveloping areas.
Objective CD-M: Develop a system of residential streets, sidewalks, and alleys that serve both vehicles
and pedestrians.
Policy CD-59. A citywide street and sidewalk system should provide linkages within and between
neighborhoods. Such system should not unduly increase pass-through traffic,but should create a
continuous, efficient, interconnected network of roads and pathways throughout the City.
Policy CD-60. Criteria should be developed to locate pedestrian and bicycle connections in the City.
Criteria should consider:
a) Linking residential areas with employment and commercial areas;
b) Providing access along arterials;
c) Providing access within residential areas;
d) Filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system where appropriate; and
e) Providing access through open spaces and building entries to shorten walking distances.
Policy CD-61. Residential streets should be constructed to the narrowest widths (distance from curb to
curb) feasible without impeding emergency vehicle access.
Policy CD-62. Landscaped parking strips should be considered for use as a safety buffer between
pedestrians and moving vehicles along arterials and collector streets.
tv-io
CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy CD-63. Intersections should be designed to minimize pedestrian crossing distance and increase
safety for disabled pedestrians.
Policy CD-64. Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to create focal
points, if such focal points do not reduce vehicular or pedestrian safety.
Policy CD-65. To visually improve the streetscape, increase the safety of perimeter sidewalks, and
facilitate off-street parking, construction of alleys providing rear access to service entries and garages
should be encouraged. Alleys are preferred in small-lot subdivisions to provide higher quality site-
planning that allows garage access from the rear and reduces curb cuts and building mass on narrow lots.
Policy CD-66. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along residential streets. Sidewalk width
should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic.
Policy CD-67. Street trees should be used to reinforce visual corridors along major boulevards and
streets.
Policy CD-68. Street trees should be protected. If removal is necessary for municipal purposes such as
infrastructure improvements or maintenance, trees should be replaced with equivalent size and variety.
Upon adoption of citywide standards, street trees should be upgraded consistent with those standards.
Policy CD-69. Appearance of parking lots should be improved by screening through appropriate
combinations of landscaping, fencing, and berms.
Policy CD-70. Structural supports for overhead traffic signals should be designed to diminish visual
impacts.
Policy CD-71. All utility lines should be placed underground.
G. Signage
Objective CD-N: Commercial signs in Renton should be regulated by citywide standards.
Policy CD-72: Sign regulations should direct the type, size., design, and placement of signs in order to
ensure reasonable aesthetic and safety considerations.
Policy CD-73. All billboards with moving parts should be eliminated.
Policy CD-74. All bulky and unusually large or tall signs should be eliminated.
Policy CD-75. Sign placement should be limited to on-site locations.
Policy CD-76. Signs should be regulated as an integal part of architectural design. In general, signs
should be compatible with the rest of the building and site design.
Policy CD-77. Consolidate information for mixed-use development to reduce the number of signs.
Policy CD-78. Locate signage to reduce light and glare impacts to residential areas.
Policy CD-79. Interpretive and directional signs for major landmarks, neighborhoods, and viewpoints
should be established to enhance community identity.
IV-11
C1TY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT ORDINANCE Td(�. 5099
Rev.ll-Ol-04 EX�llblt �L+''
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
GOAL
Create and maintain a broad and stable econornic base to sustain a high quality of life
for the Renton community.
v-i
CITY OF RENTON ECONOMTC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Summary: Renton's economic development is important because it has a role in the timing, emphasis
and extent in which the long-range goals of the city will occur. The economic development policies
encourage collaborations between the public and private sectors to ensure the long-term economic health
of Renton and its citizens. A healthy economy provides jobs and opportunity and helps pay for vital
public services such as education,parks, transportation,police and fire protection, and human services.
The policies encourage a mix of industrial,retail, service, and office uses that will result in a diversified
employment base. The policies encourage the quality development necessary to sustain a high standard
of living in Renton. (See the Residential and Urban Center Sections of the Land Use Element and the
Capital Facilities Elernent for policies related to this Economic Development Element.)
General Objective and Policies
Objective ED-A: Use public resources efficiently to leverage economic development.
Policy ED-1. Fund infrastructure improvements Policy ED-5.1. Encourage economic
in targeted areas to encourage development and development and job creation to increase the
redevelopment. household income of the City's population.
Policy ED-2. RESERVED. Policy ED-6. Maintain uniform procedures and
Policy ED-3. Lands with adequate existing allocate sufficient resources to process
infrastructure should be given priority for development projects quickly and efficiently.
development.
Policy ED-7. Work with public schools,
Policy ED-4. Foster the development of and technical colleges, community colleges and
participate in public/private partnerships. other institutions of higher learning to foster a
well-trained and educated work force.
Policy ED-5. Increase the diversity of
employment oppartunities within the City.
Objective ED-B: Expand the retail and office base within the City.
Policy ED-8. Increase the retail sales tax base Policy ED-12. Create a tool box of incentives
of the City. to encourage retail development, for example,
tax increment financing,marketing, etc.
Policy ED-9. Adopt land use and zoning that is policy ED-13. Create incentives to encourage
supportive of responsible economic office development, for example, tax increment
development. financing, and marketing.
Policy ED-10. Identify strategies and incentives Policy ED-14. Evaluate the need for expansion
to attract new businesses to occupy existing of commercial land uses in the context of the
office space within the City. City's desire to protect residential land uses.
Policy ED-11. Ensure an adequate amount of
land is designated for retail/commercial uses
based on site characteristics,market demand,
community need, and adequacy of facilities and
services.
v-2
C[TY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Objective ED-C: Sustain and expand the current industrial and manufacturing(heavy and light)
employment base in the Employment Area Valley and Employment Area—Industrial designations.
Policy ED-15. Retain manufacturing and Policy ED-16. Work with private property
industrial jobs in the Employment Area-Valley owners and governmental agencies to remedy
and Employment Area-Industrial designations contaminated sites and prepare the sites for
redevelopment.
Policy ED-15.1. Encourage high technology
research and development jobs citywide. Policy ED-17. Work with industrial and
manufacturing employers within the City to
Policy ED-15.2. Encourage light industrial jobs expand,redevelop and modernize their physical I
that contribute to the diversity of the Renton plants.
employment base and support other industries in
the City. Policy ED-17.1. Work with property owners to
transition surplus industrial properties to their
highest and best use.
Objective ED-D: Provide incentives for powntown Economic Development.
Policy ED-18. Retain existing and attract new Policy ED-22. Regional commercial uses
businesses that generate consumer-oriented relocating to and within the downtown should
commercial activity. be accommodated,when practical, in order to
retain and add to those commercial uses.
Policy ED-19. Aggressively market downtown policy ED-23. Business recruitment and
as a place to live, shop, and do business. retention efforts for the downtown should focus
Policy ED-20. Achieve a reasonable balance on those uses that can be integrated into the
between parking supply and parking demand. urban context of downtown.
Policy ED-21. Develop a downtown parking
strategy that provides incentives for downtown
business and retail development.
Objective ED-E: Contribute to a healthier regional economy.
Policy ED-24. Influence local and regional
economic development efforts.
V-3
Amended t2/12/97 ORDINANC^ i10. 50`�3
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT Exhibit �F�
ENVIRONMEN�AL ELEMENT
GOAL
1. Continue protection of Renton's natural systems,natural beauty, and environmental quality.
vi-i
Amended 12/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
General Objective And Policies.................................................................................................VIII-3
SurfaceWater............................................................................................................................VIII-3
RiversAnd Streams...................................................................................................................VIII-4
Wetlands....................................................................................................................................VIII-4
FloodPlains......................................................................... .....................................................VIII-5
Stormwater.................................................................................................................................VIII-6
Ground Water Resources...........................................................................................................VIII-7
Fisheries And Wildlife Resources.............................................................................................VIII-8
Process.......................................................................................................................................VIII-8
AtmosphericConditions............................................................................................................VIII-9
Steep Slopes, Landslide, And Erosion Hazards.........................................................................VIII-10
SeismicAreas ............................................................................................................................VIII-10
CoalMine Hazards....................................................................................................................VIII-11
V I-2
Amended 12/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Summary: The purpose of the environmental policies is to provide the policy background and basis for future
environmental actions by the City of Renton as it attempts to balance urbanization, economic development, and
natural area protection. Environmental policies address substantive issues such as development within
floodplains, wetlands, and steep slopes and procedural issues such as how these areas should be mapped and
how they should be regulated. Environmental policies will be implemented through economic development
decisions, critical areas regulations, and incentives for environmental protection. (See the Employment Area-
Industrial and Open Space Sections of the Land Use Element, Stormwater Section of tlae Capital Facilities Plan
Element, Stormwater&Aquifer Protection Sections of the Utilities Element for policies related to
Environmental Element.)
General Objective and Policies
Objective EN-A: Protect,restore and enhance
environmental quality through land use plans and
patterns, surface water management programs,park
master programs, development reviews, incentive
programs and work with citizens, land owners, and public
and private agencies.
Policy EN-1. Prevent development on lands where
development would create hazards to life,property,
or environmental quality. 1
Discussion: Development clustering,preservation
of sigrtificant natural features, and retention of or
establishment of vegetated corridors are examples
of development patterns that implement these
objectives.
Surface Water
Objective EN-B: Protect and enhance water quality of surface water resources.
Policy EN-2. Manage water resources for multiple environmental reasons. Surface water pollution
uses including recreation, fish and wildlife, flood may ultimately mean aquifer pollution.
protection, erosion control, water supply, energy
production, and open space. High water qualiry can be achieved through the use
of Best Management Practices for industries and
Policy EN-3. Minimize erosion and sedimentation businesses. Preservation of riparian corridors can
by requiring appropriate construction techniques protect receiving waters from storm water effects
and farming practices. such as erosion and sedimentation. Further
protection of surface water will come through
Policy EN-4. Limit discharges of pollutants such aqa�ifer protection policies and ordinances, which
as chemicals, insecticides,pesticides, and other could limit discharges of pollutants. Land uses are
hazardous wastes to surface waters. suggested in the plan which will also secondarily
address surface water impacts.
Discussion: The quality of surface water resources
is important for the City of Renton for public health
and safety reasons, as well as recreational and
V I-3
Amended 12/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rivers and Streams
Objective EN-C: Protect and enhance the City's rivers,major and minor creeks and intermittent stream
courses.
Policy EN-5. Degraded channels and banks should
be rehabilitated by public programs and new
development.
Policy EN-6. Develop land use regulations which
establish and enhance setbacks along all waterways
and intermittent stream courses. The purpose of the
setbacks would be to retain an enhancement of the
natural vegetation for infiltration,maintenance of 2
wildlife habitat and normal water temperatures,
filtration, and the retardation of run-off and ero-
sion.
Policy EN-7. If crossings and/or access points are
required across fishbearing river and stream
channels, improvements should be made in the
following order of priority:
1. Crossing and bridges which access several
properties.
2. If crossings and bridges are not feasible,
culverts could be used which are oversized
and have gravel bottoms which maintain be made to restore them. For new areas, the natu-
the channel's width and grade. ral systems should be protected. For exarnple, the
use of closed pipe drainage systems for streams in
Discussion: The rivers and streams within the City developments shauld be prohibited except where no
hold great irnportance for the citizens. These other feasible alternative exists and where the
waterways can be protected through three closed system will not cause any significant
measures: preservation of their courses, their degradation of water quality or habitat.
banks, and the vegetation next to them. For areas
that have already been degraded, all efforts should
Wetlands
Objective EN-D: Preserve and protect wetlands for overall system functioning.
Policy EN-8. Achieve no overall net loss of the stable water temperatures,provide for the
City's remaining wetlands base. biological regime,reduce amount and velocity of
run-off, and provide for wildlife habitat.
Policy EN-9. In no case should development
activities decrease net acreage of existing wetlands. Policy EN-11. Water level fluctuations in wetlands
used as part of storm water detention systems
Policy EN-10. Establish and protect buffers along shauld be similar to the fluctuations under natural
wetlands to facilitate infiltration and maintain conditions. The utilization,maintenance, and
V I-4
Amended l2/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
storage capacity provided in existing wetlands Policy EN-17. Meet water quality standards prior
should be encouraged. to discharging surface water into wetlands.
Policy EN-12. Pursue all potential funding sources
in order to purchase significant wetlands.
Policy EN-13. When development may impact
wetlands,the following hierarchy should be
followed in deciding the appropriate course of
action:
a. avoid impacts to the wetland,
b. minimize impacts to the wetland,
c. restore the wetland when impacted,
d. recreate the wetland at a ratio which will �
provide for its assured viability and
success,
e. enhance the functional values of an existing
degraded wetland.
Policy EN-14. Provide a ranking system for
wetlands based on their acreage and quality. High
quality wetlands should have more protection under
this system. Discussion: The City has over 350 acres of
wetlands at the tirne of this writing. These wetlands
Policy EN-15. Provide incentives for an overall provide flood storage, wildlife habitat, water
net gain of wetland functions and values of new quality protection, water quantity or infiltration,
development. aesthetic relief, erosion and sedimentation control,
Policy EN-16. Encourage public access to and pollutant removal. In some areas of the City,
wetlands for use when sensitive habitats are the natural functioning of these wetlands is integral
protected. to protection of properties from flooding.
Flood Plains
Objective EN-E: Protect the natural functions of 100 year floodplains and floodways.
Policy EN-18. Prohibit permanent structures from Policy EN-21. Incorporate design features which
developing in floodways due to risks associated are intended to keep harmful substances from flood
with deep and fast flowing water. waters in any development which is allowed in the
100 year floodplain.
Policy EN-19. Limit development within the 100
year floodplain to that which is not harmed by Policy EN-22. Emphasize non-structural methods
flooding. Roads and finished floors of structures in planning for flood prevention and damages
should be located above the 100 year flood level reduction.
and new development should provide compensation
for existing flood storage capacity due to filling. Policy EN-23. Dredge the Cedar River bed as one
method of flood control.
Policy EN-20. Restrict land uses to those which do
not cause backwater or significantly increase the
velocity of floodwaters.
VI-5
Amended 12/l2/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Stormwater
Objective EN-F: Conduct a stormwater management program which optimizes Renton's water resources.
Policy EN-24. Maintain and enhance natural
drainage systems to protect water quality,reduce Policy EN-31. Implement surface water
public costs, and prevent environmental management systems which protect natural features
degradation. whenever feasible.
Policy EN-25. Preserve natural surface water Policy EN-32. Promote means of flow control,
storage sites that help regulate service flows and when required in waterways, that maintain the
recharge groundwater. channel in as natural a state as possible.
Policy EN-26. Provide local funding for the Policy EN-33. Use,maintain, and enhance the
stormwater program through Storm Water Utility. natural stormwater storage capacity provided in
existing significant wetlands.
Policy EN-27. Control quantity and quality of
stormwater run-off from all new development to be Policy EN-34. Use interlocal agreements and
consistent with or improved over existing cooperative planning programs to coordinate,
conditions. where appropriate, with King County,Tukwila, and
Kent and other agencies for stormwater manage-
Policy EN-28. Minimize on-site erosion and ment.
sedimentation during and after construction. policy EN-35. Actively participate in non-point
Policy EN-29. Route stormwater run-off from new source pollution watershed plans including those
development to avoid gully erosion or landslides in far the May Creek, Cedar River, and Green River
ravines and steep hillsides. Basins.
Policy EN-30. Industries and businesses should
use best management practices to prevent erosion
and sedimentation and to prevent pollutants from
entering ground or surface waters.
Objective EN-G: Provide a storm and surface water control and drainage system capable of preventing threats
to life,property and public safety during a 100 year flooding event.
Policy EN-36. Promote the return of precipitation Discussion: With the average annual rainfall as
to the soil at natural rates near where it falls high as it is in the City, storm water control is an
through the use of detention ponds, grassy swales, important concern. Regional and localized
and infiltration where feasible. flooding is found in downtown Renton and in the
Green River Valley. While various agencies
Policy EN-37. Promote development design which manage the rivers for flood control, large amounts
minimizes impermeable surface coverage by of storm water from impervious surfaces contribute
limiting site coverage and maximizing the exposure to the floodi�ag situation. As the drainage basins
of natural surfaces. continue to develop in King County and other
Green River Yalley cities, more storm water passes
Policy EN-38. Manage the cumulative effects of through Renton, the final downstream jurisdiction
storm water through a combination of engineering for these basins.
and preservation of natural systems.
VI-6
Amended 12/12/97
C1TY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Engineering techniques can control much of the engineering and preservation of natural systems
storrnwater through detention and retention such as streams, rivers, and wetlands. These
systems. However, the cumulative effects of storm policies work in concert then, with the previous
water can only be managed by a combination of natural system policies.
Objective EN-H: Support and sustain educational, informational, and public involvement programs in the City
over the long term in order to encourage effective use,preservation, and protection of Renton's water resources.
Policy EN-39. Provide information for and Policy EN-41. Create the long-term community
participate in informing and educating individuals, commitment that will be necessary to sustain
groups,businesses, industry, and government in the efforts to protect the City's water resources and
protection and enhancement of the quality and maintain and improve water quality through
quantity of the City's water resources. educational programs.
Policy EN-40. Increase the community's Discussion: Individuals can aid in stormwater
understanding of the City's ecosystem and the managernent through Best Management Practices
relationship of the ecosystem to water resources. at the single family home or single business level.
Ground Water Resources
Objective EN-I: Ensure the long-term protection of the quality and quantity of the groundwater resources of
the City of Renton in order to maintain a safe and adequate potable water supply for the City.
Policy EN-42. Designate and protect areas of Policy EN-45. Any businesses relocating to the
critical recharge and other associated aquifers downtown that use or store materials regulated by
within the City and the sphere of influence through the Aquifer Protection Ordinance should be sited
coordination with surrounding jurisdictions. outside of Zone 1 of the aquifer.
Policy EN-43. Emphasize the use of open ponding Discussion: In 1988, the Environmental Protection
and detention, grassy swales, clean roof run-off, Agency designated the Cedar River aquifer as a
and other stormwater management techniques that sole source aquifer for the potable water for the
maximize water quality and infiltration where City of Renton. 98%of the City's water supply
appropriate and which will not endanger comes from that aquifer or from springs in the
groundwater quality. Talbot Road area. Strong policies protect these
supplies through a variety of inethods, including
Policy EN-44. Acquire the most sensitive lands protection of natural systems and careful
such as wetlands and flood plains for conversion to regulation of development in sensitive aquifer
parks and greenbelts. areas.
Objective EN-J: Increase the participation by the City of Renton in resolution of regional ecological issues
that may impact aquifer protection.
Policy EN-46. Promote the use of interlocal Policy EN-48. Discourage the continued use of,
agreements with other agencies to restrict land use and hauling of waste to,the Cedar Hills landfill
in sensitive aquifer recharge areas to minimize through the City of Renton.
possible sources of pollution and the potential for palicy EN-49. Participate in land use and
erosion,and to increase infiltration. sewerage decisions in outlying areas of the City's
Policy EN-47. Actively participate in regional aquifer.
highway planning, construction, and traffic
restrictions.
vi-�
Amended l2/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Fisheries and Wildlife Resources
Objective EN-K: Protect and enhance wildlife habitat throughout the City.
Policy EN-50. Identify unique and significant runs during the year. Springbrook Creek, Honey
wildlife habitat as defined by Washington State Creek, and May Creek also provide habitat for
Habitat and Species Project and ensure that salmonids. The Black River forest provides habitat
buildings,roads, and other features are located on for over 35 species of birds, including heron and
less sensitive portions of a site. eagles, and many small mammals. The Cedar
River, May Creek, and Panther Creek corridors
Policy EN-51. Identify and preserve corridors have forested, meadow, and shrub habitats that
connecting habitat acquisition,regulation of provide shelter and food for many species. Deer
development proposals, and other means. have been spotted migrating through the power line
corridors which criss-cross the City.
Policy EN-52. Encourage preservation and Besides these east-west corridors, a north-south
enlargement of existing habitat areas through corridor of habitat exists stretching from the Cedar
development incentives. River drainage to the May Creek drainage directly
outside the city limits on the plateau.
Policy EN-53. Re-establish self- sustaining
fisheries resources in appropriate rivers and creeks These policies provide for preservation of these
through encouragement of hatcheries and salmonid habitats. A variety of inethods could be used to
use. implement these policies: conservation easements,
large lot zoning, city open space purchase and
Policy EN-54. Retain and enhance aquatic and wildlife management, setbacks, retention of
riparian habitats by requiring vegetated buffers for vegetation in various areas, and landscaping
all new development along waterway corridors. regulations specifying native vegetation which
would provide food and shelter for wildlife.
Discussion: The City of Renton, unlike many
major Puget Sourtd cities, has several unique areas
of habitat. The Cedar River supports major fish
Process
Objective EN-L: Environmentally sensitive areas should be identified and regulated to protect life and
property according to the severity of the natural hazards.
Policy EN-55. The following should be considered Policy EN-56. Maintain an inventory of
in designating and controlling environmentally environmentally sensitive areas including
sensitive sites: descriptions of criteria for designation and maps.
a) critical areas and resource lands inventory;
b) steep slopes drainage swales, lakes,wetlands, Policy EN-57. Regulate identified sensitive areas
bogs, streams,rivers, or other surface water through the implementation of regulations
bodies; addressing uses, densities, clearing, grading, and/or
c) unstable or water bearing soils; vegetation removal.
d) unique flora and unique fauna;
e) historic and archeological sites; and Po�icy EN-58. Designate setbacks around
� unique natural features. environmentally sensitive areas to protect both the
areas and the users.
VI-8
Amended 12/12/97
C[TY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Policy EN-59. Establish and maintain a secondary Policy EN-63. A review process should be
system of corridors to protect agriculture,timber, established to make any changes in the inventory of
forest lands, and wildlife habitat and to provide environmentally sensitive areas.
linkages between critical areas.
Policy EN-64. Critical areas, or portions of critical
Policy EN-60. Encourage preservation of these areas,may be included in community separators.
secondary corridors through incentives and
regulations which will provide for public health and Discussion: These policies provide an integrated
safety, and provide visual relief from urban approach for the regulation and management of
structures and development. environmental areas based on the value of the
resource and/or the severity of the hazards. The
Policy EN-61. Where appropriate combine all maps reveal that several of the critical areas often
critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas occur simultaneously and provide wildlife habitat if
with recreational facilities to provide public access undeveloped. The policies envision a two-tiered
and trail linkages through separators. approach to these areas: the most hazardous
Policy EN-62. The final identification of should be designated as critical corridors; the
environmentally sensitive or critical areas, second as environmentally sensitive and should
hazardous sites or portions of sites should be include agriculture, mineral,forest lands, and
established during the review of project proposals. wildlife habitat not associated with a critical area.
Regulations and land use designations could be
provided to these two groups allowing for
development where appropriate.
Atmospheric Conditions
Objective EN-M: Protect and promote clean air and minimize individual and cumulative noise impacts to
ensure a healthful environment.
Policy EN-65. Maintain high air quality standards
through efficient land use patterns.
Policy EN-66. Promote air quality through
reduction in emissions from industry,traffic,
commercial, and residential uses.
Policy EN-67.. Limit noise from construction
activities to reasonable hours of the day and days of
the week.
Policy EN-68. Limit the use of public address
systems to ensure that noise does not spill over to
adjacent land uses and activities on a daily basis.
Policy EN-69. Ensure that the design,placement,
and use of any on-site equipment, such as air
conditioning units or other equipment is accom-
plished in a manner which minimizes noise impacts
on adjacent land uses and activities.
V I-9
Amended 12/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Palicy EN-74. Retain or replace native ground
Steep Slopes,Landslide, and Erosion Hazards cover after construction in areas subject to erosion
hazards. Special construction practices should be
Policy EN-70. Land uses on steep slopes should be used,and allowable site coverage may need to be
designed to prevent property damage and reduced to prevent erosion and sedimentation.
environmental degradation, and to enhance Limitations on the time when site work can be done
greenbelt and wildlife habitat values by preserving may also be appropriate.
and enhancing existing vegetation to the maximum
extent possible. Policy EN-75. Incorporate design elements which
preserve and enhance the natural drainage system
Policy EN-71. Allow land alteration only for into developments in an effort to control erosion
approved development proposals or approved and sedimentation.
mitigation efforts that will not create unnecessary
erosion,undermine the support of nearby land, or Policy EN-76. Design,locate, and construct utility
unnecessarily scar the landscape. systems in a manner which will preserve the
integrity of the existing land forms, drainage ways,
Policy EN-72. Mitigate problems of drainage, and natural systems.
erosion, siltation, and landslides by decreasing
development intensity, site coverage, and Discussion: Renton is located in a geographically
vegetation removal as slope increases. unique area. The walls of the plateaus and river
valleys contain both steep and erosive conditions.
Policy EN-73. Protect high landslide areas from Numerous landslides create costs borne by the
land use development and roads. public agencies every year and private owners
often suffer property damage from these same
events. Due to the high annual rainfall and soil
conditions, erosion damage can occur on relatively
level areas as well as steep ones. These policies set
up standards which will protect public health,
safety and welfare and allow development to
proceed in appropriate areas.
Seismic Areas
Objective EN-O: Reduce the potential for damage to life and property due to seismic events.
Policy EN-77. Minimize the risk of structural Policy EN-78. Prior to development in high
damage, fire, and injury to occupants, and prevent seismic hazard areas,builders should conduct
post-seismic collapse by using special building special studies to evaluate seismic risks and should
design and construction measures in areas with use appropriate measures to reduce the risks.
high seismic hazards.
VI-10
Amended 12/12/97
CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEATENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Coal Mine Hazards
Objective EN-P: Reduce the potential for damage to life and property due to abandoned coal mines, and return
this land to productive uses.
Policy EN-79. Identify areas which may be
impacted by abandoned coal mines.
Policy EN-80. Develop land use plans and zoning
to reflect the hazards to development in identified
areas.
Policy EN-81. Allow land uses to locate in coal
mine hazard areas,provided the hazards are
precisely located and all significant hazards
associated with the mines are eliminated,making
the site as safe as a site which has not been
previously mined.
Policy EN-82. Show the location of coal mine
hazards on any plat or site plan maps. Such
documents should be recorded.
Discussion: The City of Renton has a long and
rich history of coal mining. Most mining ceased by
the end of World War II but the mines still rernain.
Some entrances have not been properly sealed,
some shafts present potential for collapse, and
some areas rnay generate methane gas. These
hazards are often unnoticeable on the surface, but
may present subterranean dangers for the property
owners. These policies reflect the importance of
identifying and regulating these areas.
vi-i t
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT
Exhibit `G'
Rev. 11-01-04 ORDINANCF� T10 0 50�'�
HOUSING ELEMENT
GOALS
1. Ensure sufficient land capacity to accommodate the existing and future housing
needs of the community, including Renton's share of forecasted regional growth.
2. Ensure that housing exists for all economic segments of Renton's population.
3. Ensure that there are housing opportunities for people with special needs, such
as seniors, people with disabilities, and the homeless.
4. Maintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life of Renton's residents.
H:\EDNSP\Comp Plan�Amendments\GMA Update\Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�F-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-1
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Overview of Housing Element.............................................................................3
II. State and Regional Planning Context ..................................................................4
III. Public Review Process.........................................................................................5
IV. Goals....................................................................................................................16
V. Objectives and Policies
A. Single-Family/Multi-Family Balance of Unit Types.....................................16
B. Cost of Regulation, Permitting Time, and Fees.............................................16
C. Upper-Income Housing..................................................................................16
D. Moderate- and Middle-Income Housing........................................................17
E. Low-Income Housing....................................................................................18
F. Special Populations........................................................................................19
G. Variety of Housing Types and Regulatory Measures for Affordability........20
H. Manufactured Housing Zone.........................................................................21
I. Manufactured, Modular, and Factory Built Homes.......................................21
J. Preservation of Existing Housing..................................................................21
K. Quality of Neighborhoods..............................................................................22
L. Home Ownership...........................................................................................22
M. Housing in Mixed-Use Areas.........................................................................23
H:�EDNSP\Comp Plan�Amendments\GMA Update�F'ina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-2
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
HOUSING ELEMENT
I. Overview
Renton has a diverse housing stock with a wide range of unit types and prices.This includes new
single-family homes of all sizes, older single-family homes and flats,townhouses, semi-attached
houses,low-and mid-rise apartments and condominiums,and high-density mid-rise apartments
in the Urban Center. Renton also has a strong sense of community, and many established
neighborhoods organized around schools,parks, and other institutions.
In addition to established neighborhoods, where infill development has been increasingly
common,the City has newly developed neighborhoods close to its southern and eastern edges,
and emerging mixed-use residential neighborhoods in several of its commercial centers. In 1998,
Renton's downtown started to undergo a transformation, with a considerable amount of new
housing development. Downtown Renton is becoming a vibrant urban neighborhood with many
amenities. Areas along Lake Washington are also being redeveloped with mixed-use residential
and commercial development, also at urban densities.Families,young singles, and couples are
choosing to locate in Renton because of the community's amenities and the availability of new
housing that suits their needs.
Renton continues to have a supply of vacant,underutilized, and redevelopable land in its
neighborhoods and mixed-use centers, offering many opportunities for growth.The policies and
map included in the Land Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan establish sufficient land
capacity to accommodate forecasted population growth with new housing. The policies of the
Housing Element further define how the City's housing stock and neighborhoods will grow and
change.
The Housing Element is based on an assessment of Renton's current demographics and existing
housing stock. It also responds to the State's Growth Management Act(GMA),to the King
County Countywide Planning Policies(CPP),to the City's Vision Statement, and to other
elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Along with the residential sections of the Land Use
Element, the Housing Element considers how Renton will accommodate its share of projected
regional growth and how it will provide housing for all economic segments of its population. It
provides a framework for addressing the housing needs of current and future residents.Finally, it
serves as a guide for protecting and enhancing the quality of life in residential and mixed-use
areas. (See the residential sections of the Land Use Element for additional policies related to
housing policies.)
II. State and Regional Planning Context
Housing is one of the 13 major goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA).
The GMA housing goal is to:
"Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of
this state,promote a variery of residential densities, and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock."
By GMA mandate,the Housing Element must include:
l. An inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PIan�Amendments\GMA Update\Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VtI-3
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
2. A statement of goals,policies, and objectives for the preservation,improvement
and development of housing.
3. An analysis that identifies sufficient land for housing, including,but not limited
to government-assisted housing,housing for low-income families,manufactured
housing,multifamily housing, and group homes and foster care facilities.
4. An analysis that makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of
all economic segments of the community.
GMA directs that the "plan shall be an internally consistent document." The policies of one
element cannot conflict with those of another element. The policy decisions made in each
element may either be affected by or direct the other elements. The various elements address
housing issues in the following ways. •
Land Use Element Directs where housing locates, its density, and the purpose
and character of various land use designations
Housing Element Refines and types of housing,provides a strategy for
addressing the affordability of housing, and a policy
foundation for reaching citywide housing objectives
Utilities Element Influences the location of housing,costs,timing of
development.
Transportation Element Influences access to housing,jobs, and services
Capital Facilities Element Influences services, quality of life,timing of development
Community Design Element Influences how residential neighborhoods and infill housing
will look
Amendments to the GMA in 1991 require cities and counties to jointly develop countywide
housing policies. King County's Countywide Planning Policies, developed by the Growth
Management Planning Council,responded to this by identifying a housing unit growth target for
each community in the County. The CPP also specify targets for housing units for each
community that should be affordable to moderate and low-income households, and require
jurisdictions to set housing unit growth targets for middle and upper income households. This
Housing Element defines these targets and how they will be met.
III. Public Review Process
In 2002,the City convened a special task force to review its existing housing policies and the
current housing situation, and to make recommendations for the 2002 update of the Housing
Element.The task force included citizens,non-pro�t and for-profit housing developers, and
members of the faith and human services community. The group met nine times during the first
half of 2002. It first looked at background data about Renton's housing,population, income, and
zoning. Then it discussed issues including the variety of housing types,housing for moderate and
low-income residents, costs associated with housing development, and preservation of existing
housing stock.The Housing Element Task Force issued its Recommendation Report in June
2002.
The recommendations of the Task Force were reviewed by the Planning Commission, City
Council, and Mayor. The Housing Element,with other Comprehensive Plan Elements was
H:\EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�F'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
V II-4
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
substantially revised as part of the GMA-mandated update. The Task Force recommendations
have been incorporated into the revised goals, objectives, and policies of the Housing Element.
IV. Goals
The Housing Element includes four broad goals,which provide general direction for the Element.
Each goal is explained below, along with related information on Renton's population,housing
stock, and housing growth capacity.Following the discussion is a list of Housing Element
objectives and policies.The objectives provide a framework for guiding city actions and housing
unit growth, and each objective responds to several goals.The policies that follow each objective
further shape and guide city actions and development regulations.
Renton's Housing Element goals are:
1. Ensure sufficient land capacity to accommodate the existing and future housing needs of the
community, including Renton's share of forecasted regional growth.
2. Ensure that housing exists for all economic segments of Renton's population.
3. Ensure that there are housing opportunities for people with special needs, such as seniors,
people with chronic disabilities, and the homeless.
4. Maintain,protect, and enhance the quality of life of Renton's residents.
A. Capacity
The 2000 Census showed 22,676 housing units in Renton, and it is estimated that in 2002 there
were close to 24,000 units.Renton's mid-range housing unit growth target for the years 1992
through 2012 was 9,020.This figure was developed as part of the CPP and was based on
forecasted population growth and household size. It includes a target of 60 units for the
annexation area,transferred into the City's target as the area was annexed.From 1992 through
2000,there were 4,177 new housing units permitted in the City of Renton. This amounts to 46%
of the middle target, achieved in first nine years of the first GMA 20-year planning period.
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan update plans for to a new target for housing unit growth from Jan.
1, 2001 through Dec. 2022. Renton's new target is 6,198 units. This replaces the remaining target
from the 1992-2012 planning period.The target is based on projected population growth,
household size, and the amount of growth that occurred since the first round of comprehensive
planning under GMA.
GMA requires jurisdictions to show zoned land capacity for their targeted number of new housing
units.This capacity includes land that is available for new development,redevelopment, or infill
development.
Renton's 1995 Comprehensive Plan established policies about minimum density requirements for
the City's residential zones.Minimum densities ensure that actual residential development
corresponds to the planned levels of growth,meets Urban Center criteria,minimizes inefficient
use of urban services and infrastructure, and supports transit service in urbanized areas. By
setting a base standard for allowed density,minimum density standards increase the average yield
in each zone. The annual Buildable Lands Reports,part of a countywide effort to track the actual
density of growth and future growth capacity,establishes Renton's land capacity based on
H:\EDNSP\Comp PIan�Amendments\GMA Update�F'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)V-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
V II-5
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
average net density. This report showed that at the beginning of the planning period, Jan.2001,
Renton's capacity for growth was 11,261 units and 32,240 jobs. During the first two years, 1,608
units were reviewed and vested for development.
As of January 1, 2003, capacity for 9,653 units remained based on the Buildable Lands
methodology, capacity of areas annexed to the City during the two-year period, and
Comprehensive Plan Annual Map Amendments. The housing unit target remaining as of Jan. 1,
2003 is 4,523 units.
Figure 1 below shows the remaining zoned capacity of 9,653 units for housing units by land use
category within the city, according to the Land Use Map, as of January 1, 2003. This City has
sufficient capacity to house targeted growth through 2022.
For the purposes of Capital Facilities planning,Renton plans for forecast growth in addition to
targeted growth. (See Capital Facilities Element Policy CFP-1 and growth projections section.)
This policy ensures that needed infrastructure is in place if market-driven growth exceeds targets.
The data in Figure 1 shows that the City has sufficient capacity under Building Lands
methodologies for both targeted and forecast residential growth during the six-year period
addressed in the Capital Facilities Element and for the 21-year planning period.
Figure 1
Development Capacity
as of Jan.1,2003
2,579
\ 1,885 2,314
�
3
`. �'�`
�£..
�:
, .�
480
7 ��:= B�e� ,,4 .. .
C >. T >+ M C �
°�'� E E E � O � N
� co ;v_ m � � �•�
� o m ��� � U 0 oa
U tn � �' V
.�
m
�
Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management
B. Mix of Unit Types
In 2000,Renton had an approximately equal amount of housing units in single-family houses as
in multi-family buildings. This did not represent a significant change in the proportion when
compared to 1990.Figure 2 shows Renton's housing stock by structure type.
H:�EDNSP\Comp P1anWmendments\GMA Update�Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�IIousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-6
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
The largest growth since 1990 was in buildings of five or more units(1,889 new units), followed
by single-family structures(1,235 new units). Sixty-four new flats(duplex units)were added,and
226 new units in structures containing three or four units. Since the first Countywide housing unit
growth targets were established in 1992, 60% of Renton's new housing units have been in
multifamily structures.
Figure 2
Housing Units by Structure Type,2000
5 or more unit
structure Single family
42% detached
49%
,�
3-4 unit �plex
structure 3%
<oi
v.0
Source.• 2000 U.S. Census
The approximately 9,653 units that would be built if all vacant land and land with redevelopment
potential within the City were to be developed at its currently zoned capacity would bring the
total number of housing units to about 33,650. Assuming 24,000 units existed in 2002, of the
total,about 14,100 units or about 42 percent would be in single-family structures and about
19,550 units or about 58 percent would be in multi-family buildings. Approximately 3,500 of the
new multifamily units would be in the downtown area.The eventual mix of single-family and
multi-family units depends upon many factors including demand, development costs,and specific
development regulations,especially in areas where regulations allow a mix of unit types.
The Citywide balance can also be adjusted through annexation of unincorporated areas,which are
predominately single-family and have additional zoned capacity for single-family houses.
C. Household Size in Relation to Ownership
Demographic trends provide an indication of future demand for various unit types. According to
the 2000 U.S. Census, average household size in Renton is 2.29 persons. Renton's household size
is much smaller than several of its neighboring South King County cities and smaller than nearby
Bellevue. Average household size for owner-occupied housing units in 2000 was 2.47. For renters
it was 2.11.This shows an increase in renter-occupied household size,up from 2.03 in 1990, and
a decrease in owner-occupied household size, which was 2.53 in 1990.
D. Household Composition in Relation to Ownership
In Renton, 34%of all households are people living alone.This represents the most common
household composition, and the majority of them, 62%, are renters. Thirty-three percent of
Renton's households are two-person households, the majority of these, 66%, are homeowners. Of
H:\EDNSP\Comp Plan�Amendments\GMA Update�F'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-7
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
family households,which include single parents, 60%are homeowners,while only 36%of non-
family households are owners(this includes people living alone). Figure 3 shows the composition
of Renton's households.
Figure 3
Household Composition in Renton,2000
Other Married couple
16% no children
23%
�,,�
�.,;
�,
Married couple
Living alone with children
34% 18%
Single parent
with children
9%
Source.• 2000 U.S. Census
E. Housing for All Economic Segments
GMA requires all jurisdictions to encourage the availability of housing for all economic segments
of the population. These economic segments are defined by the State of Washington and the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) as follows:
Upper Income Households at 121% of Median Income and above
Middle Income Households at 80-120%of Median Income
Moderate Income Households at 50-80%of Median Income
Low Income Households at 30-50%of Median Income
Very Low Income Households below 30%of Median Income
HUD also defines the maximum amount that households should have to pay for housing as 30%
of total household income. The CPP consider households that earn less than 80%of county
median income,but pay more than 30% of their income for housing costs,to be in need of less
expensive housing. T'he CPP ask all cities to take action to address existing housing needs,and to
create affordable housing for expected population growth.
Housing costs are related to development costs,but are also a function of supply and demand,
interest rates, and policies at many levels of government. As the vast majority of housing is
supplied by the private sector, local governments use re�ulatory means to influence the supply,
unit types, and affordability of new housing. Local regulations with an impact on the cost of
housing include subdivision and road requirements,utility policies,development and mitigation
fees,building and energy code requirements, and zonin�regulations. In addition, overall permit-
processing time also affects new home prices.
1. Affordability of Housing in Renton
H:\EDNSP\Comp Plan�Amendments\GMA Update�Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�I-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
V II-8
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Housing prices have risen significantly in Renton and in most parts of King County over the
past 25 years.From Apri12001 to April 2002 alone,the Northwest Multiple Listing Service
showed a 27%increase in Renton's median home sale price. Over the past decade,home
prices have outpaced growth in income, although low interest rates starting in the late 1990s
and continuing through the time of this update have made high prices somewhat more
affordable.Rents also increased substantially durin�the 1990s,but leveled off in the early
2000s. While other parts of the economy slowed in 2001 and 2002,home prices remained
high.
Renton median sale prices and rents are somewhat lower than for King County, and the 2001
King County Benchmarks Report showed that a greater percentage of Renton's market-rate
housing is affordable to moderate and low income households than is affordable in King
County as a whole. Figure 4 shows the percentage of market-rate housing units that were
affordable to three broad income categories based on prices and county median income in
2000.
Figure 4
Housing Stock Affordability for Household
Income Categories, 2000
50%AMI and
below
Above 80°/a �$ Z�o�o
AMI `�;�
42% �,;.
51 to 80%AMI
31%
Source: 2001 King County Benchmark Report
Based on 2000 HUD Incorne Levels for King County and market-rate rental and ownership units
Figure 4 does not account for 1,424 units of subsidized,public, and non-profit housing in
Renton. An inventory done by the City in 2002 showed that approximately 910 of these
units(4%of Renton's total housing units) are geared at households at or below 50%
AMI, although the varying types of income restrictions used in subsidized housing means
the count is only an estimate. 'The chart also does not account for households living in
Renton with Section 8 rental assistance vouchers. In January of 2002, over 500 Renton
households(2% of all Renton households)received Section 8 rental assistance. Section 8
vouchers are for households earning at or below 50%AMI. The chart does not indicate
the availability of market-rate affordable housing, its condition, its size or adequacy for
the households that need or occupy it.
The chart also does not show separately the amount of market-rate housing affordable to
very low income households,those earning 30%AMI or below, since it is combined with
the 30-50%AMI category. The City's inventory of subsidized housing shows at least 260
units, or 1.2% of all housing units,that is available for this category. In addition, 75%of
Section 8 vouchers are for households in this category.
H:�EDNSP\Comp P1an�Amendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-9
CITYOFRENTONHOUSINGELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Overpayment for housing is perhaps the best indication of need, although Census 2000
data showing"overpayment correlated to income"were not available at the time of this
writing. The percent of renter households in Renton that are overpaying jumped by 4.6
percentage points from 25.6 in 1989 to 30.2 in 2000.The percent of owner-occupants
who are overpaying nearly doubled, from 9.6 in 1989 to 18.0 in 2000,however it is likely
that many overpaying owner-occupant households are in higher income categories than
overpaying renters. (These figures include households paying more than 35%of income
on housing costs.)
Underpaying households comprise a much larger portion of all Renton households,
indicating that many have significant disposable income. Of renters,48J percent were
underpaying in 2000 (spending less than 25 percent of income on housing costs),and
62.4 percent of owner-occupants were underpaying.
Figure 5 shows an estimate of Renton's households by HiJD income categories.When
compared with the percent of housing affordable to the income categories in 2000,this
data indicates that Renton has a shortage of housing for middle and upper income
households, a small surplus of housing for low-income households and a large surplus of
housing for moderate-income households. However,it was not possible to determine
whether the affordable housing shown in Figure 4 was actually occupied by lower
income households.
Figure 5
Esti�r:ate of Rento�:population by HUD i�acome categories,2001
Approximate
Percent number
of households
�Low and very low income �50% of inedian and below� 23%� 5,096�
�Moderate income �51 to 80% of inedian � 14%� 3,074I
�Middle income �81 to 120% of inedian � 27%� 5,914�
�Upper income �Over 120% of inedian � 36%� 7,869�
� �Total � 100%� 21,953�
Source: Calculations based on data from Claritas
This data does not account for household size.
2. Upper Income Housing
The 1995 Comprehensive Plan set a goal of 30%of new housing units per year to be
affordable at the upper income level. Of ownership housing, approximately 41%of new
homes sold in 2001 were affordable to upper income households(or some middle income
households with a down payment of more than 5%). All of these were detached, single-
family homes. The prices of new construction rental homes were not tracked. Of existing
home sales, about 19%were affordable to upper income households.
While a few of the new upper-income homes are in areas with one or fewer units per
acre,the majority is in the R-5 (5 units per acre)zone. In addition,there are a number of
new market-rate apartment complexes on Lake Washington and in the downtown,with
some units geared at upper-income households. As the region becomes more densely
populated and the convenience and amenities of urban neighbarhoods become
H:�EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-10
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
increasingly desirable, upper income households will be found in a greater variety of
neighborhoods and housing types. Apartment,townhouse, and condominium units with
amenities such as views and waterfront access account for a growing share of high-end
housing.
3. Middle Income Housing
The middle segment has many choices for housing in Renton,and much of the new stock
of ownership housing in 2001 is affordable to this group. However, estimates of income
and housing suggest that an increase in housing for this segment would be readily
absorbed.New single-family homes in new neighborhoods and on infill sites will provide
housing for this income segment,while innovative housing types such as small lot
detached houses and semi-attached houses,may also be a part of the growth in housing at
this income level.
4. Moderate Income Housing
Analysis of data from 1997 through 2001, suggests that Renton exceeded its target of
17% of new units annually affordable to the moderate-income segment with ownership
housing alone. In addition, a large amount of rental housing in Renton is also available at
this level,with average market-rate rents being affordable to households at 80%AMI and
slightly older buildings being affordable below that level of income. By 2002,rising
apartment vacancies meant more availability of rental stock affordable to this category.
Low interest rates have also helped moderate-income households,mostly those at the
high end of this category,to purchase a home. There is no way,however,to judge what
vacancy and interest rates will be in the long term.
The City values opportunities for home ownership at the moderate-income level,
particularly the opportunity to buy a first home. Where households can locate in
neighborhoods with convenient access to transit, some may choose to lower their rate of
car ownership, saving money and allowing them to pay(or borrow)more for housing.
5. Low and Very Low Income Housing
While the majority of new housing is affordable to moderate,middle, and high-income
households, the majority of housing for low and very low-income households has
historically been older stock, although some new stock is geared at these income
segments. Some of the community's housing needs that cannot be met by the market are
met by public housing authorities, such as the Renton Housing Authority(RHA), and by
private non-profit housing providers.The RHA is one of only four public housing
authorities in King County. Since current conditions make construction of housing
affordable to low and very low-income households difficult without a subsidy,RHA and
non-profits play a necessary role in providing and managing a portion of Renton's
housing stock. These organizations are generally subject to the same land use regulations
as for-profit developers,however they can access an array of federal,local, and charitable
funding to make their products affordable to hol�seholds in the lower income segments.
In recent years, financial tools have been created at the federal and state level to enable
private for-profit developers to provide subsidized housing for low-income households.
These tools, such as tax credits,may play an increasing role in the provision of housing
H:\EDNSP\Comp PIan�Amendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)U-Iousing Element.docLast printed
]0/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-11
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
for low and moderate-income levels. Some household needs are also met through
payment assistance programs that have traditionally been available only for renters,but
are now occasionally available for homeowners.
While approximately 6%of new stock created in the last planning period was affordable
to the low and very low-income group,the number of households in this income group in
Renton served by Housing Choice vouchers has been increasing over the past few years.
The combination of a Housing Choice Voucher and Renton's existing affordable stock
has been the means by which Renton provided housing for low-and very low-income
families.
F. Overcrowding
Overcrowding is an indicator of housing need. It is created by high housing costs or by a shortage
of available housing units,which force people to over-occupy housing units or"double up."
Moderate overcrowding is defined as households with between 1.01 and 1.50 persons per room.
Extreme overcrowding is de�ned as households with over 1.51 persons per room. Figure 6
shows that overcrowding rates in Renton have increased since 1990, indicating that there may be
more need for additional housing units than income and housing price data show.
Figure 6
Overcrowded Households in Renton, 1990 and 2000
I 1990 2000 I
Number Percent of Number Percent of
(18,642 total Total (21,689 total Total
households) Households households) Households
Moderate Overcrowding I 424 2.3% 750 I 3.5% 1
Extreme Overcrowding I 261 1.4% 701 I 3.2% 1
Source: 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census Data
However,the rental vacancy rate was very low(4.7%)at the time of the 2000 census and it is
possible that overcrowding has eased somewhat since vacancy rates have increased since then
(8.8%in spring 2000,according to Dupre+Scott).Both increasing the supply of affordable
housing and providing higher wage employment opportunities for residents can ease
overcrowding.
G. Housing for Special Populations
Elderly residents often need specialized housing combined with services and many elderly find
their incomes declining as they grow older,making affordable housing more important. Census
2000 sample data showed an estimated 401 persons in Renton age 65 and over and below the
federally defined poverty level. This is about 0.8%of the Renton's population,or about 7.8%of
the population age 65 and over. The poverty rate among the elderly was actually lower than the
rate among the general population,which was 9.7%. Of the population age 65 and over,46%
(2,215 individuals)have a disability, according to Census 2000, although the degree of disability
was not indicated. Mean Social Security income for households in Renton in 1999 was$12,100.
Mean retirement income for households in Renton in 1999 was$18,330.
H:\EDNSP\Comp P1an�,Amendments\GMA Update�F'ina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-12
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
A City-initiated inventory in 2004, of subsidized,public,and non-profit housing, showed 297
units of dedicated senior housing,215 units for either seniors or the disabled and 209 units for
either seniors or families. In addition,there were 16 housing units dedicated to the
developmentally disabled,and three units exclusively for mentally ill residents.This does not
include the many market-rate housing units that may also be occupied by special population
residents.
H. Homelessness
Homelessness tends to be a regional issue,as homeless households are mobile and tend to go
where emergency and transitional housing are mare accessible. Emergency shelters provide
housing for a few nights to a few months,while transitional housing is typically for a few months
to one or two years. South King County has 51%of the emergency housing units in the county
outside of Seattle, and 61%of the transitional housing units in the county outside of Seattle.
Renton has transitional housing for 21 families, about 8%of South King County transitional
housing units.
Homelessness is difficult to measure, and homeless rates are difficult to predict.The proportion
of homeless people with limited English-speaking ability,measured during a one-night count of
homeless population in emergency and transitional housing in King County outside of Seattle was
14%.This is significantly higher than that of King County's general population,which is 8.4%
according to Census 2000.The rate of limited English speaking ability among individuals in
Renton's population is 12%. The majority of homeless people in shelters are part of families,
though this may reflect the fact that many shelters are designed to serve families. Of homeless
households in the one-night count(in King County excluding Seattle) 34%included an employed
person, indicating that low wage jobs may be a factor in homelessness. The disability rate in the
same count was 21%, a measure that includes alcohol and substance abuse(39%of disabilities)
along with physical and mental disabilities(Source: United Way).
I. Neighborhood Enhancement
In 1997,the City started its Neighborhoods Program to enhance the quality of community life,
strengthen neighborhood identity, increase neighborhood involvement in government, and
encourage the preservation of neighborhood character when neighborhoods are impacted by new
development. Infill development in existing neighborhoods is part of the strategy for meeting
housing unit growth targets. Many City policies,particularly those in the Community Design
Element of this Plan, aim to address neighborhood concPrns as neighborhoods are always
impacted in some way by new development.
J. Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Areas
Mixed-use areas include a significant amount of Renton's housing unit growth capacity, and
comprise several of Renton's existing commercial areas. Renton is guiding redevelopment in
these areas to be pedestrian-oriented and to incorporate housing for a variety of income levels,as
well as commercial and office uses. The mixed-use areas will provide a high quality of life with
proximity from residential units to shopping,transit,parks, and a variety of public facilities.
K. Urban Center
The South Lake Washington redevelopment area and Downtown Renton comprise a regional
Urban Center,with an existing and planned mix of residential,commercial, and public uses. In
H:�EDNSP\Comp Plan�?.mendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�I-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-13 ,
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
1990,Downtown Renton had a significant concentration of low-income housing, and a lack of
market-rate housing. By 2002,this trend had been reversed.Three new developments in the
Downtown Core,with retail on the ground floor and several floors of market-rate housing above,
started the much-anticipated transformation of the downtown into a pedestrian-friendly urban
residential neighborhood.Downtown Renton also has a new transit center, urban park,new
performing arts center, and City-owned public parking garage making living there both
convenient and enjoyable.Additional market-rate downtown housing is anticipated.
The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments provided policies that will guide redevelopment of
the South Lake Washington Redevelopment Area(Boeing Renton Plant site). This area,
designated"Urban Center-North"to distinguish it from the Urban Center-Downtown,will
include retail,light industrial or high-technology uses,office,commercial and residential in
addition to existing aircraft manufacturing(until Boeing transitions out of the area).
The estimated number of residential units(all attached units)is approximately 3,225 by the year
2030,based on a conceptual scenario.
L. Homeownership
The City considers homeownership desirable at all income levels, as it produces stable
neighborhoods and gives citizens a long-term stake in the community. Though increases in
housing price made it increasingly difficult for first time buyers to enter the housing market
during much of the 1990s, low-interest rates in the past few years have eased this situation.
The percentage of owner-occupied housing units in Renton increased from 45.9%in 1990 to
47.8%in 2000. In order to encourage continued growth in homeownership at all income levels,
Renton is encouraging the construction of a variety of housing types.Programs to help first-time
homebuyers, sometimes simply through education,can also contribute to increased home
ownership. In addition,the City of Renton adopted a condominium conversion ordinance in
1979. Very few condominium conversions have occurred since that time,however.
M. Age of Residential Structures
Housing built since 1990 accounts for over 21%of Renton's housing stock, with much of it being
built since 1995.However,Renton also has a significant proportion of older housing stock.
Twenty-four percent of the stock was constructed in 1959 or before. Some older houses are
located in parts of the City now designated for mixed-use or commercial development. Figure 7
describes the age of residential structures in the City at the time of the 2000 Census.
Figure 7
Age of Residential Structures 2000
Year Structure Built Number of Units Percenta�e of Total
1999 to March 2000 758 3.3%
1995 to 1998 2,193 9.7°/a
1990 to 1994 1,886 8.3%
1980 to 1989 4,875 21.5%
1970 to 1979 3,679 16.2%
1960 to 1969 3,878 17.1%
1940 to 1959 3,982 17.5%
H:�EDNSP\Comp P1an�Amendments\GMA Update�E'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-14
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
1939 or earlier 1,448 6.4%
Total 22,699 100.0%
Source.• 2000 U.S. Census
1. Condition of Housing
There is no current data available on housing condition in Renton. However, the City also is
active in funding two programs through the Community Development Block Grants designed
to prevent deterioration of housing in Renton. The City also inspects for building code
violations both pro-actively and based on complaints.
2. Demolitions
Since 1990 about 12 housing units were demolished per year in the City. Many demolitions
were of structures adjacent to expanding commercial areas. Other demolitions were the result
of new subdivisions and multifamily housing developments. In some cases new single-
family homes were rebuilt on the site of a recently demolished single-family home.
Most residential demolitions are done by private action. Rarely has the City, in the course
building code enforcement,had to remove a residential structure to ensure public safety.
However the City has,and likely will in the future, acquire and demolish residential
structures in the course of making infrastructure improvements or other municipal activities.
N. Manufactured and Modular Housing and Mobile Homes
Manufactured or modular housing is prefabricated housing that is placed on a foundation.When
new manufactured housing is placed in single-family zanes,it is required to conform to all
applicable development standards. With recent advances in design, construction,and shipping,
new manufactured homes can be virtually indistinguishable from site-built homes in both
appearance and quality,while offering real cost savings.
The City and its potential annexation area also include several mobile/manufactured home parks
built over the past 50 years. As of June 2002,the City of Renton has one mobile home park and
two manufactured housing developments. The three properties consist of 487 dwelling units.
Early mobile home parks were designed for"movable"homes and in some cases accommodated
long-term occupancy of travel and camping trailers. Some newer manufactured housing
developments were master-planned and conformed to the development standards of a zoning
district designed to accommodate them. There is also a small but undetermined amount of older
mobile/manufactured housing units scattered on individual lots throughout the City.
As property values in the Puget Sound region continue to increase,the conversion of mobile
home parks to other land uses continues to be an issue. While mobile homes can provide
affordable ownership housing,they do not contribute to a household's assets through appreciation
in the way that owning permanent housing can.
O. Nonconforming Uses
Approximately three hundred residential structures are nonconforming in respect to their zoning
and could be converted from housing to other uses. Many of these nonconforming housing units
are older in age and are in higher-than-average levels of disrepair. Many are single-family houses
H:\EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-15
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
located in commercial and high density residential zoning districts in and around the City's Urban
Center.
P. Tracking Progress toward Goals
Monitoring,which is required by the Countywide Planning Policies, enables jurisdictions to
evaluate the effectiveness of their housing policies and development regulations. To date, cities
have successfully provided data to King County for tracking the actual density of new housing
development. This is useful in evaluating the progress of cities toward forecasted housing unit
growth, without consideration of affordability.
More limited efforts have been made in tracking the affordability of new housing units, and
cities' progress toward their targets for each income segment. A clear definition of the types of
housing that count toward each target makes monitoring possible.However,affordability is a
moving target since it is based on supply and demand,income, interest rates, and other dynamic,
and somewhat unpredictable factors. In addition, data on the sales prices of homes tend to be
more complete than rental data,though the varying level of savings and financial terms with
which households purchase their homes makes true affordability difficult to measure. The
monitoring of affordability can only be based on the best data available.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�F'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-16
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
HOUSING
V. Objectives and Policies
A. Single-Family/Multi-Family Balance of Unit Types
Objective H-A: Maintain a balance in the number of single-family and multi-family
housing units outside of the urban center, through adequately zoned capacity.
Policy H-1. Count new unit types as follows when monitoring the single-family/multi-
family balance:
1. Count cottages as single-family houses.
2. Count semi-attached houses as single-family houses.
3. Count accessory dwelling units as multi-family units,while continuing to count
the primary unit in a house with an ADU as a single-family unit.
Policy H-2. Ensure that sufficient multi-family capacity is provided within the city
boundaries in order to accommodate housing demand,provide adequate housing options,
meet urban center criteria under the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning
Policies, and prevent unnecessary increases in housing costs.
B. Cost of Regulation, Permitting Time, and Fees
Objective H-B: Ensure that City fees and permitting time are set at reasonable levels so
they do not adversely affect the cost of housing.
Policy H-3. Ensure predictable and efficient permit processing.
Policy H-4. Create and maintain utility standards that encourage infill development.
Policy H-5. Create and maintain development standards that reduce the overall cost of
housing as long as health and safety can be maintained.
C. Upper Income Housing
Objective H-C: Increase housing opportunities for upper income households.
Policy H-6. Achieve the target of thirty(30)percent of new housing units annually
through 2022 to be affordable to upper income households that earn over 120 percent of
county median income, as established by the City in response to the Countywide
Planning Policies.
Policy H-7. Provide opportunities for large- and medium-lot single-family development.
H:\EDNSP\Comp Plan�Amendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-17
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-8. Utilize low-density, single-family areas and Resource Conservation
designations to provide opportunities for upper income development.
Policy H-9. Encourage larger lots on parcels with physical amenity features of the land
such as views, significant vegetation, or steep slopes.
Policy H-10. Encourage construction of upper income homes on larger existing parcels
that are exempted from minimum density requirements.
Policy H-11. Encourage the construction of luxury condominium developments in
mixed-use areas.
Policy H-12. Support site plans and subdivisions incorporating amenity features such as
private recreation facilities, e.g. pools, tennis courts, and private parks to serve luxury
developments.
Policy H-13. Increase public awareness of upper income housing opportunities in
Renton.
D. Moderate And Middle Income Housing
Objective H-D: Encourage the private sector to provide market rate housing for the
widest potential range of income groups including middle- and moderate-income
households.
Policy H-14. Achieve the Countywide Planning Policies target that seventeen(17)
percent of new housing units annually through 2027. should be affordable to moderate
income households that earn 51 to 80 percent of county median income.
Policy H-15. Achieve the target of thirty-three (33)percent of new housing units
annually through 2022 to be affordable to middle income households that earn 81 to 120
percent of county median income, as established by the City in response to the
Countywide Planning Policies.
Policy H-16. Encourage home ownership opportunities affordable to moderate income
households.
Policy H-17. Encourage the construction of townhouse, condominium, and rental units
affordable to moderate income households in mixed-use developments as defined in the
Land Use Element.
Policy H-18. Continue to provide technical assistance for redevelopment of land
particularly in Downtown Renton.
Policy H-19. Market Renton to housing developers.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PIan�Amendments\GMA Update�Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�I-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-18
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-20. Continue to maintain an updated inventory of land available for housing
development.
Policy H-21. Support proposals for moderate-income housing based on the following
criteria:
1. Dispersion of moderate-income housing throughout the City.
2. Convenient access to transit for moderate-income households
3. A range of unit types including family housing.
4. Ownership housing when possible
5. Long-term affordability.
Policy H-22. Pursue public-private partnerships to provide and manage moderate-
income housing.
Policy H-23. Provide zoning standards that allow studios and other small rental units
that would be affordable to moderate-income households.
Policy H-24. Disperse moderate-income housing in all areas of the City that have vacant
land.
Policy H-25. Ensure that a sufficient amount of land in all multi-family and mixed-use
areas of the City is zoned to allow attached housing and innovative housing types.
Policy H-26. Support proposals for affordable housing, created with public subsidies that
give priority to households earning at or below 80 percent of regional median income.
E. Low Income Housing
Objective H-E: Increase housing opportunities for low and very low-income Renton
residents and provide a fair share of low-income housing in the future.
Policy H-27. Achieve the Countywide Planning Policies target for Renton, defined by
the City as: the number of housing units equal to twenty(20)percent of newly permitted
housing units annually through 2022 to be affordable to low income households that earn
fifty(50)percent or less of county median income.
Policy H-28. Establish the following sub-targets fob affordability to households earning
50 percent or less of county median income, to be counted toward the 20 percent target:
1. Ten percent of new housing units constructed in the City.
2. A number equal to five percent of new housing units, to be met by existing units
that are given long-term affordability.
3. A number equal to five percent of new housing units, to be met by existing units
that are purchased by low-income households through home-buyer assistance
programs.
H:�EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)U-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-19
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-29. Support proposals for low-income housing for households earning less than
60 percent of area median income based on the following criteria:
1. Dispersion of low-income housing throughout the City.
2. Convenient access to transit for low-income households.
3. A range of unit types including family housing.
4. Ownership housing when possible.
5. Long-term affordability.
Policy H-30. Pursue public-private partnerships to provide and manage affordable
housing.
Strategy H-30.1. Support non-profit agencies that construct and manage projects
within the City.
Strategy H-30.2. Support the role of the Renton Housing Authority in providing
additional housing.
Strategy H-30.3. Before City surplus property is sold, evaluate its suitability for
development of affordable housing.
Strategy H-30.4. Use a greater percentage of federal funds including Community
Development Block Grants and HOME funds to support low and moderate
income affordable housing.
Policy H-31. Work with other King County cities to address regional housing issues.
Policy H-32. Disperse low-income housing in all mixed-use and multi-family land use
designations that allow attached dwelling units.
Policy H-33. Encourage preservation, maintenance, and improvements to existing
subsidized housing and to market-rate housing that is affordable to low and moderate-
income households.
Policy H-34. Reduce existing housing need, defined as the number of existing
households that earn 80 percent of county median income, and are paying more than 30
percent of their income for housing, or live in inadequate housing by increasing housing
supply for all economic segments of the community.
Strategy H-34.1. Create opportunities for higher income households to vacate
existing lower cost units,but stay in Renton by creating larger houses on larger
lots.
Strategy H-34.2. Prioritize applications to the City for housing rehabilitation
grants to homeowners earning 80 percent of county median income ar below
based on the greatest degree of existing need. With the exception of emergencies,
priority should be given to households occupying conventional housing.
F. SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Objective H-F: Increase the supply of special needs housing.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update\Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
V II-20
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-35. Support the housing programs of social service organizations, including the
Renton Housing Authority, that provide opportunities for special needs populations.
Policy H-36. Support the establishment and operation of emergency shelters.
Policy H-37. Support proposals for special needs housing that:
1. Offer a high level of access to shopping, services, and other facilities needed by
the residents.
2. Demonstrate that it meet the transportation needs of residents.
3. Help to preserve low-income and special needs housing opportunities in a
neighborhood where those opportunities are being lost.
4. Disperse special needs housing throughout�he residential areas of the City.
Policy H-38. Support development proposals by sponsors of assisted housing when
applicants document efforts to establish and maintain positive relationships with
neighbors.
Policy H-39. Retain the City of Renton Fair Housing Ordinance to reflect the following
principles from the Federal Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988:
1. Ensure that no dwelling is made unavailable or denied to any member of a
protected class.
2. Make reasonable accommodations in its rules,policies,practices, and services
when such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons with disabilities
equal opportunity to use or enjoy a dwelling.
3. Prohibit the application of special requirements through land use regulations,
restrictive covenants, and conditional or special use permits that have the effect of
limiting the ability of persons from protected classes to live in the residence of
their choice in the community.
G. Variety of Housing Types and Regulatory Measures for Affordability
Objective H-G. Allow the construction of a variety of housing types affordable to low,
moderate, and middle-income households when site plans and subdivisions address
maintaining the quality of neighborhoods.
Policy H-40. Support projects including subdivisions and site plans incorporating
innovative lot and housing types, clustered detached houses, clustered semi-attached
houses, and varied lot and housing types within a site.
Policy H-41. Support projects that incorporate quality features, such as additional
window details, consistent architectural features on all facades, above average roofing
and siding, entry porches or trellises where innovative site or subdivision designs are
permitted.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PIan�Amendments\GMA Update�F'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-21
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-42. Encourage the construction of cottages on small lots through incentives
such as density bonuses. Implementing code will be in place within three years of the
adoption of the GMA update.
Policy H-43. Support standards that allow cottage housing developments with the
following features in residential zones,provided the cottages are limited by size or bulk:
1. Allow increased density over the zoned density.
2. Allow reduced minimum lot size, lot dimensions, and setbacks.
3. Allow both clustered and non-clustered cottages.
4. Allowing clustered parking.
5. Base the required number of parking spaces on unit size, or number of
bedrooms.
Implementing code will be in place within three years of the adoption of the GMA
update.
Policy H-44. Support accessory dwelling units as strategies for providing a variety of
housing types and as a strategy for providing affordable housing, with the following
criteria:
1. Ensure owner occupancy of either the primary or secondary unit.
2. Allow both attached and detached accessory dwelling units and detached
carriage units, at a maximum of one per single-family house, exempt from the
maximum density requirement of the applicable zone.
3. Require an additional parking space for each accessory dwelling unit, with the
ability to waive this requirement for extenuating circumstances.
4. Allow a variety of entry locations and treatments while ensuring compatibility
with existing neighborhoods.
Implementing code will be in place within three years of the adoption of the GMA
update.
H. Manufactured Housing Zone
Objective H-H: Continue to allow manufactured home parks and manufactured home
subdivisions on land that is specifically zoned for these uses.
Policy H-45. Maintain existing manufactured housing developments that meet the
following criteria:
1. The development provides market rate housing alternatives for moderate and low-
income households.
2. The housing is maintained and certified as built to the International Building Code
and Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development standards.
3. Site planning includes pedestrian amenities, landscaping, and a community
facility.
H:\EDNSP\Comp P1an�Amendments\GMA Update�Final 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-22
CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.I 1-01-04
I. Manufactured, Modular, and Factory Built Homes
Objective H-I: Allow the use of quality modular or factory-built homes on permanent
foundations.
Policy H-46. Allow and encourage the use of"gold seal" modular homes built to the
standards of the International Building Code, and "red seal"manufactured homes built to
the standards of the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development in any zone
allowing residential uses, as long as the housing meets all applicable city codes, looks
similar to site-built housing, and is placed on a permanent foundation.
J. Preservation of Existing Housing
Objective H-J: Preserve and protect the existing housing stock.
Policy H-47. Preserve existing housing stock where residential uses conform to zoning
requirements.
Policy H-48. Encourage replacement of demolished housing units within redevelopment
proj ects.
Policy H-49. Target code enfarcement to correct health and safety violations.
Policy H-50. Identify areas in the City for priority funding for rehabilitation by non-
profit housing sponsors.
Policy H-51. Continue City funding of housing rehabilitation and repair.
Policy H-52. Encourage creative re-use of existing buildings for housing within the City,
where housing can be included at zoned capacity.
K, Quality of Neighborhoods
Objective H-K: Develop and maintain livable nei�hborhoods with a desirable quality of
life.
Policy H-53. Promote high quality residential living environments in all types of
neighborhoods.
Policy H-54. Promote community identity, pride, and involvement in neighborhoods.
Strategy H-54.1. Continue to support the City's neighborhood program to
encourage neighborhood involvement, address local conditions, and provide
neighborhood enhancements.
H:�EDNSP\Comp PlanWmendments\GMA Update�Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�I-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
V II-23
CITY OF RENTON HOUSINC ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy H-55. Protect the character of existing single-family neighborhoods by promoting
high quality development.
Strategy H-55.1. Use design standards to encourage housing types that protect
privacy, provide landscaping or other buffering features between structures of
different scale, and/or promote investments that increase property values where
housing that is more dense is allowed in existing single-family neighborhoods.
Strategy H-55.2. Development standards for flats and triplex developments
should encourage design at the scale of single-family developments by limiting
building length and height.
Policy H-56. Relate the size of structures to the size of lots in order to create
development that fits into a neighborhood.
Policy H-57. New single-family subdivisions should provide pedestrian and vehicular
connections to adjoining residential development unless a determination is made that a
physical feature of the site, such as a ravine, wetland or pre-existing developed property
prevents practical implementation of this provision.
L. Homeownership
Objective H-L: Increase the percentage of homeownership in the City.
Policy H-58. Allow zero lot line developments and flats with common wall construction
on separately platted lots in designations that permit attached unit types.
Strategy H-59.1. Encourage condominium and fee simple townhouse
developments with ground access and small yards.
Strategy H-59.2. Encourage the development of small-detached houses on platted
lots, or condominium developments where lot areas with yards are established
without platting.
Policy A-59. Support first time homebuyer programs such as those available through the
Washington State Housing Finance Commission and other similar private or not-for-
profit programs with similar or better program elements and rates.
M. Housing in Mixed-Use Areas
Objective H-M: Develop location designated residential living environments in mixed-
use developments, as defined in the Land Use Element.
Policy H-60. Encourage a range of housing types in the Urban Center and those
commercial designations allowing mixed-use.
H:�EDNSP\Comp P1an�Amendments\GMA Update�Fina12004 Update(Comp Plan)�Housing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-24
CITY OF RENTON HOUSINC ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy H-61. Through non-conforming use policies in Section V, Land Use Element,
maintain existing housing units until property is redeveloped as part of a higher density
residential or mixed-use proj ect.
Policy H-62. Encourage housing in the Urban Center that provides opportunities for all
economic segments of the population.
H:\EDNSP\Comp P1anWmendments\GMA Update�'inal 2004 Update(Comp Plan)�I-Iousing Element.docLast printed
10/22/2004 9:12 AM
VII-25
Exhibit `H'
City of Renton Human Services El�.ment
Added 11-01-04 ORDINANCE NO. 50`�`�
HUMAN SERVICES ELEMENT
GOAL
To create a community in which all members have the opportunity to meet their basic
physical, economic, and social needs,for the enhancement of their quality of life.
VIII-1
City of Renton Human Services Element ORDIIVANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Discussion: Human Services are services and strategies that.•
➢ Support vulnerable or "at risk"individuals and families in times of need,
➢ Address the social conditions tltat make people vulnerable or put tlaem at risk, and
➢ Foster an effective and efficient system of services.
Hurnan Services that meet basic human needs and prornote safe and healthy cornrnunities can
be represented on a continuum,from prevention of crises, including crime, to assuring basic
survival, to assistance in becoming self-reliant. This continuum includes the following
spectrurn of services:
• Pf•evention cznd Earlv bztervention— Those services and strategies that reduce or prevent
adverse hurnan behaviors and social conditions that lead to crises, serious dysfunction or
disability. An example of a preventative service is counseling—counseling�nay help
avoid or reduce the severiry of depression.
Preveration by its nature means that absolutely nothing happens, its success registered
only in later comparisons. Early interventions present the problems of all investments in
growtla—the dividends come later. There is a long-tirne lapse between intervention and
payoff, which rnakes prompt demortstration of effectiveness impossible.
• Crirniraal Justice Linked Services— Tlaose services that assist iftdividuals and their
families avoid involvement "with the system". After-school programs for youth are an
example.
• Crisis Intervention Services— Those services that address life threatening situations and
other crises. Provision of food and shelter falls into this category.
• Rehabilitation arad Sunport—Those services and strategies tlaat provide treatment for
individual and farnily problerras or provide support to maintain or enhance their present
level of independence. Drug and alcohol treatment is an exarnple of rehabilitation.
Objective HS-A: Enable individuals to meet their basic physical, economic, and
social needs by promoting an effective human services delivery system and
enhancing their quality of life.
Policy HS-1: To identify opportunities and and promote community awareness of needs
develop strategies that are proactive and and resources available.
preventative in their approach to human
services needs. Policy HS-4: Foster a community that is
free of discrimination and prejudice.
Policy HS-2: Allocate City general funds Policy HS-5: Build support for and
for services that address the full spectrum of awareness of human services to create a
community needs. community that values diversity,responds to
the special needs of individuals and families,
Policy HS-3: Assess and anticipate local and shares the responsibilities and benefits
human services needs,provide leadership in of living in this City and region.
the development of community responses,
VIII-2
City of Renton Human Services Element ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective HS-B: Make human services more accessible to the Renton community.
Policy HS-6: Encourage services to be achieve efficiencies through agency co-
accessible to all in the community by location and coordination.
removing any barriers, including,but not
limited to site planning, cultural,language, One Stop Human Service Centers or multi-
communication, or location. service centers allow individuals and
families to access many services at one
Policy HS-7: Support the development and location. They are e�cient because people
operation of facilities for human services, are not traveling to multiple locations to
and where appropriate, seek opportunities to receive help.
Objective HS-C: Create a caring community that mirtures and supports individuals,
children, and their families.
Policy HS-8: Link services, such as abatement may mean making people
transportation and childcare,to jobs to homeless. Ensuring there are community
improve the ability of people to obtain and resources to assist these residents,before
retain employment. they are abated, is critical.
Policy HS-9: Promote efficient Policy HS-11: Collaborate and partner with
transportation and supporting site locations non-profits, churches, employers,
to jobs and services, especially for lower- businesses, and schools.
income people, while planning local and
regional transportation systems and Policy HS-12: Support the ability of
economic development activities. residents to obtain, and retain livable wage
jobs. This includes,but is not limited to job
Policy HS-10: Consider human services skills and occupational training,English as a
objectives in developing City regulations Second Language classes, and
and codes. For example, enforcing code communication skills.
Objective HS-D: Preserve and protect the ea�isting housing stock.
Policy HS-13: Maintain the City's Housing
Repair Assistance Program for low and
moderate income homeowners.
Objective HS-E: Utilize resources efficiently and effectively.
Policy HS-14: The City's role is to fund, Block Grants. The staff and Advisory
advocate, facilitate,plan, and inform by Committee members advocate for those who
continually engaging service providers and cannot do so for thernselves. As planners,
community organizations in dialogue needs are assessed and anticipated, and
regarding the functioning of the present appropriate policy and program responses
service systems, the emerging needs of the are developed. Staff facilitates in
community and the building of a complete convening and engaging others in
system of services. community problem solving to develop and
irnprove services. We inform by educating
The Human Services Division distributes and providing resources.
general funds and Community Developrnent
VIII-3
City of Renton Human Services Element ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective HS-F: Encourage collaborative partnerships between the City and school
districts to identify and meet the needs of children and families.
Policy HS-15: Encourage cooperation with focal point for the identification of needs
school districts, focusing on schools areas and delivery of services to children and
with attendance in the City, in the families.
development and utilization of schools as a
Objective HS-G: Participate in regional and local efforts that address human services
needs in the region and in the City.
Policy HS-16: Support and actively Policy HS-17: Continue the City's active
coordinate with local,regional, and national participation in the South King County
efforts that address local human services Human Services Forum,the South King
needs and ensure that local programs Council of Human Services, and other
complement programs provided at the state regional groups.
and federal level.
VIII-4
CITY UF RENTf�N LAND IUSE ELEMENT �Xhlbit �I�
Rev.ii-41-04 t1RDINANCE NfJ. 50�:�fi
LAND USE ELEMENT
GOALS
I. Plan for future growth of the Urban Area based on regionally develaped
growth farecasts, adopted growth targets, and land capacity as determined
through implementatian of the Growth Management Act.
II. Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents on the graund and
for aircraft occupants.
III. Actively pursue annexations.
IV. Maintain the City's natural and cultural history by documenting and
ap�ropriateIy recognizing its historic and/or archaealogical sites.
V. Pursue the transition of non-conforming uses and structures to encourage
more conforming uses and development patterns.
VI. Develap a system of facilities that meet the public aud quasi-public service
needs of present and future emplayees.
VII. Maintain the City's agricultural and mining resources as part of Renton's
cultural history.
VIII.Promate new development and neigl�borhoods in the City that:
1) Contribute to a strong sense of community and neighborhaod identity;
2) Are walkable places where people can shop, play, and get to work without
always having to drive;
3) Are develaped at densities sufficient to support public transpartation and
make efficient use of urban services and infrastructure;
4) Offer a variety of housing types for a population diverse in age, income, and
lifestyle;
5) Are varied or unique in character;
6) Support"grid" and 4Gflexible grid" street and pathway patterns where
appropriate;
7) Are visually attractive, safe, and healthy environments in which to live;
$) Offer connection to the community instead of isolation; and
9) Provide a sense of home.
IX-1
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
IX.Develop well-balanced attractive, convenient, robust commercial office, office,
and residential development within designated Centers serving the City and the
region.
X. Support existing businesses and provide an energetic business environment for
new commercial activity providing a range of service, office, commercial, and
mixed use residential uses that enhance the City's employment and tax base
along arterial boulevards and in designated development areas.
XI.Achieve a mix of land uses including industr�al, high technology, office, and
commercial activities in Employment Areas that lead to economic growth and a
strengthening of Renton's employment base.
tx-2
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Regional Growth Policies..................................................................................................IX-4
II. Airport................................................................................................................................IX-8
III. Annexations.......................................................................................................................IX-11
N. Historical and Archeological Resources............................................................................IX-15
V. Non-Conforming Use.........................................................................................................IX-16
VI. Public Facilities..................................................................................................................IX-18
VII. Resource Land...................................................................................................................IX-22
VIII. Residential Policies............................................................................................................IX-24
IX. Centers...............................................................................................................................IX-36
X. Commercial........................................................................................................................IX-54
XI. Employment Areas.............................................................................................................IX-69
IX-3
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
I. REGIONAL GROWTH POLICIES
Goal: Plan for future growth of the Urban Area based on regionally developed
growth forecasts, adopted growth targets, and land capacity as determined through
implementation of the Growth Management Act.
Discussion: "Capacity" is the room for growth provided by the plan. Targets are the
politically determined share of growth assigned to each community in the region through
the Countywide Planning Policies. Forecasts are the expected growth in the City based on
regional employment and population modeling. The objective of this plan is to
appropriately analyze regionally generated estimates of both forecast growth and targets
and align those estimates with Renton's desire for economic growth and development.
Renton has the local land use authority to provide sufficient capacity to meet and exceed
both targets and forecast growth. Excess capacity can encourage sprawl and discourage
redevelopment, while insufficient capacity can make it more difficult for the market to
work. The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan should provide sufficient
direction to achieve a balance between excessive and insufficient capacity, in order to
avoid difficulty in implementing the Plan.
Objective LU-A: Plan for future urban development in the Renton Urban Growth Area
(tJGA) including the existing City and the unincorporated areas identified in Renton's
Potential Annexation Areas (PAA).
Policy LU-1. Continue to refine the boundary of the Urban Growth Area(UGA) in
cooperation with King County, based on the following criteria:
1) The UGA provides adequate land capacity for forecast growth;
2) Lands within the UGA are appropriate for urban development; and
3) Urban levels of service are required for existing and proposed land uses.
Policy LU-2. Designate Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) as those portions of
unincorporated King County outside the existing City limits, but within the Urban
Growth Area,where:
1) Renton can logically provide urban services over the planning period;
2) Land use patterns support implementation of Renton's Urban Center objectives; and
3) Development meets overall standards for quality identified for city neighborhoods.
Policy LU-3. Provide for land use planning and an overall growth strategy for both the
City and land in the designated PAA as part of Renton's regional growth policies.
Discussion: The Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies
establish urban growth areas where urban levels of growth will occur within the
subsequent 21-year period. These areas include existing cities and unincorporated areas.
IX-4
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT � ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Within the Urban Growth Area, the Potential Annexation Area(PAA) is designated for
future municipal expansion and governance. Policies guiding annexation and provision
of services within the PAA are also located in the annexation portion of the Land Use
Element; Utilities Element; Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Element and
Transportation Element.
Objective LU-B: Evaluate and implement growth targets consistent with the Growth
Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies.
Policy LU-4. Adopt the following growth targets for the period from 2001 to 2022,
consistent with the targets adopted for the region by the Growth Management Planning
Council for the 2002 Renton City limits and Potential Annexation Areas:
1) City of Renton Housing:
6,198 units
2) City of Renton Jobs:
27,597 jobs
3) Potential Annexation Area Housing
1,976 units
4) Potential Annexation Area Jobs:
458jobs
Policy LU-5. Amend growth targets as annexation occurs to_transfer a proportionate share of
Potential Annexation Area targets into Renton's targets.
Policy LU-6. Monitor targets through the City's Outcome Management evaluation process.
Objective LU-C: Ensure sufficient land capacity to accommodate forecast housing and
job growth and targets mandated by the Growth Management Act for the next twenty-one
years (2001-2022).
Policy LU-7. Plan for residential and employment growth based on growth targets
established in the Countywide Planning Policies, as a minimum. (See Housing Element
Goals and Capacity section and Capital Facilities Element,Policy CFP-1 and Growth
Projection section.
Policy LU-8. Provide sufficient land, appropriately zoned, so capacity exceeds targets by
at least twenty percent (20%).
Policy LU-9. Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity for single-
family units within the existing city limits.
Policy LU-10. Use buildable lands data and market analysis to establish adopted
capacity for either jobs or housing within each adopted zoning classification.
Policy LU-11. Minimum density requirements shall be established to ensure that land
development practices result in an average development density in each land use
IX-5
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
designation sufficient to meet adopted growth targets and create greater efficiency in the
provision of urban services.
Policy LU-12. Minimum density requirements should:
1) Be based on net density;
2) Not be applied to lots created after 1995 of less than one-half acre in size;
3) Not be required of individual portions or lots within the project;
4) May be reduced due to lot configuration, lack of access, or physical constraints;
and
5) Not be applied to construction of a single dwelling unit on a pre-existing legal lot
or renovation of existing structures.
Policy LU-13. Phasing, shadow-platting, or land reserves should be used to ensure that
minimum density can eventually be achieved within proposed developments. Adequate
access to potential future development on the site must be ensured. Proposed
development should not preclude future development.
Policy LU-14. Parking should not be considered as a land reserve for future
development, except within the Urban Center.
Policy LU-15. Amend capacity estimates as annexation and re-zonings occur.
Objective LU-D: Maintain a high ratio of jobs to housing in Renton.
Policy LU-16. Future residential and employment growth within Renton's planning area
should meet the goal of 2 jobs per 1 housing unit.
Policy LU-17. Sufficient quantities of land should be designated to accommodate the
desired single family/multi-family mix outside the Urban Center, and provide for
commercial and industrial uses necessary to provide for expected job growth.
Policy LU-18. Small-scale home occupations that provide opportunities for people to
work in their homes should be allowed in residential areas. Standards should govern the
design, size, intensity, and operation of such uses to ensure their compatibility with
residential uses.
Discussion: The ratio of new jobs to new housing units will affect the future character of
the City. Renton currently is an employment center with a high jobs/housing ratio
characterized by a high level of day-time activity, a high demand for infrastructure, a
high tax base, and a high level of commuter traffic.
Renton's current ratio of jobs to housing units is roughly 2.1 jobs per 1 housing unit.
Within King County, the overall ratio is about 1.5 jobs per 1 housing unit.
Forecasts from the Puget Sound Regional Council indicate that there will be an even
greater number of new jobs within Renton than new housing over the next 20 years. This
will increase the discrepancy between jobs and housing units within the City. However,
IX-6
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
the number of housing units in the unincorporated areas within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area are expected to grow faster than jobs so that the balance of jobs to
housing will be maintained within the City limits and the Potential Annexation Areas.
IX-7
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
II. AIRPORT
AIRPORT COMPATIBLE LAND USE POLICIES
IGoal: Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents on the ground and
for aircraft occupants. �
Discussion: In order to meet a mandate of the Growth Management Act, the City of
Renton has developed a set of objectives and policies to address land use compatibility
between the Renton Municipal Airport and an area of the City known as the Airport
Influence Area(see RMC 4-3-020). Renton's approach to planning for minimization of
risk associated with potential aviation incidents was to analyze four primary categories of
aviation operations in relation to land use compatibility. The categories used are, 1)
general aviation safety, 2) airspace protection, 3) aviation noise, and 4) overflight. A
"compatibility objective"was developed for each, with strategies to meet the objective,
and measurement criteria to ensure that the objective is met. The objectives and policies
of the Comprehensive Plan,with the implementation included in the Development
Regulations (RMC 4-3-020)meet the state requirement of GMA and the goal of this
section.
General Aviation Safety
Objective LU-E: Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents.
Policy LU-19. Adopt an airport compatible land use program for the Renton Airport
Influence Area, including an Airport Influence Area Map.
Policy LU-20. Develop performance-based criteria for land use compatibility with
aviation activity.
Policy LU-21. In the Airport Influence Area, adopt use restrictions, as appropriate, that
meet or exceed basic aviation safety considerations.
Airspace Protection
Objective LU-F: Reduce obstacles to aviation in proximity to Renton Municipal
Airport.
Policy LU-22. Require that submittal requirements for proposed land use actions
disclose potential conflicts with airspace.
Policy LU-23. Provide maximum protection to Renton airspace from obstructions to
aviation.
IX-8
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-24. Prohibit buildings, structures, or other objects from being constructed or
altered so as to project or otherwise penetrate the airspace surfaces, except as necessary
and incidental to airport operations.
Aviation Noise
Objective LU-G: Address impacts of aviation noise that is at a level deemed to be a
health hazard or disruptive of noise-sensitive activities.
Policy LU-25. Prohibit the location of noise-sensitive land uses from areas of high noise
levels, defined by the 65 DNL (or higher)noise contour of the Renton Municipal Airport.
Policy LU-26. Within the Airport Influence Area require disclosure notice for potential
negative impacts from aviation operation and noise, unless mitigated by other measures.
Policy LU-27. Residential use and/or density should be limited, within the Runway
Protection Zone and the Runway Sideline Zone to reduce negative impacts on residents
from aviation operation noise. Implementing code will be put in place within three years
of the adoption date of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-28. Non-residential use and/or intensity may be limited, if such uses are
deemed to be noise sensitive, to reduce negative impacts on users from aviation operation
noise.
Policy LU-29. Approval of residential land use or other land uses where noise-sensitive
activities may occur should require dedication of avigation easements and use of acoustic
materials for structures.
Policy LU-30. Require master planning of land to increase land use compatibility
through sound attenuation in the environment and techniques such as:
• Place uses with highest sensitivity to noise at greater distances, in consideration
of the factor of distance from the source.
• Consider creation of micro-climates to utilize mitigating meteorological
conditions (i.e. air temperature, wind direction and velocity).
• Create soft ground surfaces, such as vegetative ground cover, rather than hard
surfaces.
• Provide at appropriate heights, structures, terrain, or other ba.rriers to provide
attenuation of sound.
Overflight
Objective LU-H: In the Airport Influence Area, address impacts of overflight that are
disruptive.
IX-9
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-31. At the time of land use approval (i.e. subdivision of land) avigation
easements should be granted to the City in areas of Renton subject to negative aircraft
overflight impacts.
Policy LU-32. At the time of land use approval (i.e. subdivision of land) deed notices
should be recorded in areas of Renton subject to negative aircraft overflight impacts.
Policy LU-33. The City should establish a presence on noise-abatement review
committees, or similar forums, and request notification of noise-abatement procedures at
nearby airports that may have aircraft that impact Renton.
Policy LU-34. The City should provide information to Renton citizens of noise
complaint procedures to follow for reporting negative impacts from overflights associated
with not only Renton Airport, but also Seattle Tacoma International Airport and King
County International Airport. Implementing code will be put in place within three years
of the adoption date of GMA update.
ix-to
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
III. ANNEXATIONS
� Goal: Actively pursue annexations. �
Discussion: The growth of the City through annexation is expected to continue
throughout the planning cycle. The policies in this section are intended to guide the
annexation process. The City recognizes that fiscal impacts are only one of many criteria
to be evaluated, and must be balanced with other annexation policy goals, such as
transition to urban land use, protection of sensitive areas,provision of public service,
governmental structure, provision of infrastructure, aquifer protection, and community
identity.
Objective LU-I: Support annexation of county areas that are identified as being within
the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area and can be efficiently provided with
infrastructure and City services, are urban separators, or have environmental constraints.
Policy LU-35. The City will continue to recognize that it has an inherent interest in
future land use decisions affecting its Potential Annexation Area.
Policy LU-36. Encourage annexation where the availability of infrastructure and
services allow for the development of urban densities. Renton should be the primary
service provider of urban infrastructure and public services in its Potential Annexation
Area,provided that the City can offer such services in an efficient and cost-effective
manner.
Policy LU-37. The highest priority areas for annexation to the City of Renton should be
those contiguous with the boundaries of the City such as:
1) Peninsulas and islands of unincorporated land where Renton is the logical service
provider;
2) Neighborhoods where municipal services have already been extended;
3) Lands subject to development pressure that might benefit from City Development
Standards;
4) Developed areas where urban services are needed to correct degradation of natural
resources, such as aquifer recharge areas;
5) Lands that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive plan, zoning,
and subdivision regulations; and
6) Developed areas where Renton is able to provide basic urban services and local
governance to an existing population.
Objective LU-J: Promote annexations that would maintain the quality of life in the re-
sultant City of Renton, making the City a good place to work, live, play, shop, and raise
families.
Policy LU-38. Support annexations that would result in future improvements to City
services or eliminate duplication by service providers. Services include water, sanitary
sewer, storm water drainage, utility drainage basins, transportation,park and open space,
library, and public safety.
ix-i i
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-39. Support annexations that complement the jobs and housing goals adopted
in the Regional Growth Strategy.
Policy LU-40. Support annexations that would simplify governmental structure by
consolidating multiple services under a single or reduced number of service providers.
Policy LU-41. Promote annexations of developed areas with a residential population
already using City services or impacting City infrastructure.
Policy LU-42. Support annexations of lower density areas where it would protect natural
resources or provide urban separator areas.
Objective LU-K: Create city boundaries through annexations that facilitate the efficient
delivery of emergency and public services.
Policy LU-43. The proposed annexation boundary should be defined by the following
characteristics:
1) Annexation of territory that is adjacent to the existing City limits; in general, the more
land adjacent to the City the more favorable the annexation;
2) Inclusion of unincorporated islands and peninsulas;
3) Use of natural or manmade boundaries that are readily identifiable in the field, such
as wetlands, waterways, ridges,park property, roads/freeways, and railroads;
4) Inclusion/exclusion of an entire neighborhood,rather than dividing portions of the
neighborhood between City and County jurisdictions; and
5) Inclusion of natural corridors either as greenbelts or urban separators between the
City and adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy LU-44. Existing land uses, development, and redevelopment potential should be
considered when evaluating a proposed annexation.
Policy LU-45. Commercial uses that do not conform to Renton's land use plan should be
encouraged to transition into conforming uses or to relocate to areas with compatible land
use designations. Illegal uses not listed under King County zoning should be required to
cease and desist upon annexation.
Policy LU-46. Annexation proposals should include areas that would result in City
control over land uses along major entrance corridors to the City("Gateways").
Policy LU-47. Boundaries of individual annexations will not be reconsidered to
exclude reluctant property owners, if the annexation is consistent with land use,
environmental protection policies, and the efficient delivery of services.
Objective LU-L: Protect the environmental quality of Renton by annexing lands where
future development and land use activity could otherwise adversely impact natural and
urban systems.
Policy LU-48. Shoreline Master Program land use designations, including those for
associated wetlands, should be established during the annexation process.
IX-12
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.il-Ol-04
Policy LU-49. Annexations should be pursued in areas that lie within existing, emerging,
or prospective aquifer recharge zones,that currently or potentially supply domestic water
to the City and are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area.
Policy LU-50. Zoning should be applied to areas for purposes of resource protection,
when appropriate, during the annexation process.
Objective LU-M: Promote a regional approach for development review through the use
of interlocal agreements to ensure that land development policies in King County are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies or other City of Renton development
standards. This policy should be implemented within five years of the adoption date of
the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-51. Urban development within Renton's Potential Annexation Area should
not occur without annexation unless there is an interlocal agreement with King County
defining land use, zoning, annexation phasing, urban services, street and other design
standards, and impact mitigation requirements.
Policy LU-52. Long-range planning and the development of capital improvement
programs for transportation, storm water,water, and sewer services should be
coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions, special districts, and King County.
Policy LU-53. Interlocal agreements with other jurisdictions should be pursued to
develop solutions to regional concerns including,but not limited to water, sanitary sewer,
storm water drainage, utility drainage basins, transportation,park and open space,
development review, and public safety.
Objective LU-N: Provide full and complete evaluation of annexation proposals by
relevant departments and divisions upon the submission of the annexation proposal.
Policy LU-54. Appropriate zoning districts should be designated for property in an
annexation proposal. Zoning in the annexation territory should be consistent with the
comprehensive plan land use designations.
Policy LU-55. Larger annexations should be encouraged, when appropriate, in order to
realize efficiencies in the use of City resources.
Policy LU-56. Annexations should be expanded if they include areas surrounded by the
City on three or more sides or if they include properties with recorded covenants to
annex.
Policy LU-57. The City should respond to community initiatives and actively assist
owners and residents with initiating and completing the annexation process.
Policy LU-58. The City should ensure that property owners and residents in and around
the affected area(s) are notified of the obligations and requirements that may be imposed
upon them as a result of annexation.
Policy LU-59. The City should work with potential annexation proponents to develop
acceptable annexation boundaries.
IX-13
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-60. The City should conduct a fiscal impact assessment of the costs to
provide service and of the tax revenues that would be generated in each area proposed for
annexation.
IX-14
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
IV. HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
IGoal: Maintain the City's natural and cultural history by documenting and I
appropriately recognizing its historic and/or archaeological sites.
Discussion: Renton has a rich and interesting history as a community. It was the site of
an established Native American settlement and changed through the years of early
European immigration into a pioneer town. The City incorporated in 1901 and later
became a major regional employment center and residential area. The following policies
are intended to guide efforts to recognize and integrate Renton's past into future
development as the City evolves into a dynamic urban community.
Objective LU-O: Communicate Renton's history by protecting historic and
archaeological sites and structures when appropriate and as opportunities arise.
Policy LU-61. Historic resources should continue to be identified and mapped within the
City as an on-going process.
Policy LU-62. Natural and cultural resources should be identified by project proponents
when applying for land use approval, as part of the application submitted for review.
Policy LU-63. Potentially adverse impacts on cultural resources deemed to be significant
should be mitigated as a condition of project approval. Implementation of this policy
should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-64. The City should work cooperativel}�with King County by exchanging
resource information pertaining to natural and cultural resources.
Policy LU-65. Historical and archaeological sites, identified as significant by the City of
Renton, should be preserved and/or incorporated into development projects.
Policy LU-66. Downtown buildings and site development proposals should be
encouraged to incorporate displays about Renton's history, including prominent families
and individuals,businesses, and events associated with downtown's past. Implementation
of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
IX-15
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
V. NON-CONFORMING USE
IGoal: Pursue the transition of non-conforming uses and structures to encourage
more conforming uses and development patterns.
Discussion: As a community grows, changes in land use policies sometimes result in
"non-conforming uses"as remnants of an earlier land use pattern. Some of these non-
conforming uses can retain a viable economic life for long periods of time and even
become desirable reminders of the evolution of the City. These policies are intended to
guide decision-making about non-conforming uses and structures in the context of
current land use policy.
Objective LU-P: Evaluate requests for rebuilding of non-conforming uses beyond
normal maintenance where they can be made more conforming and are compatible with
their surroundings.
Policy LU-67. Encourage compatibility between non-conforming uses and structures
and conforming uses in neighborhoods that have significant numbers of non-conforming
uses. Implementation of this policy should occur within three yeaxs of the adoption of the
2004 Update.
Policy LU-68. Encourage developments that increase the number of conforming uses
and structures.
Policy LU-69. Transition of uses and structures from non-conforming to those that
conform to zoning and development standards should be implemented in a manner that
recognizes the overall character of the neighborhood. Implementation of this policy
should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-70. Evaluate permits for non-conforming uses,based on the following
criteria:
1) Relationship of the existing non-conforming use or structure to its surroundings;
2) The compatibility of the non-conforming use with its context and other uses in the
area;
3) Demonstrated community need for the use at its present location;
4) Over-concentration of the use within the City or within the area;
5) Suitability of the existing location;
6) Demonstration that the use has not resulted in undue adverse effects on adjacent
properties from noise, traffic, glare, vibration, etc., (i.e. does not exceed normal
levels in these areas emanating from surrounding permitted uses);
7) Whether the use was associated with a historical event or activity in the community
and as a result has historical significance;
8) Whether the use provides substantial benefit to the community because of either the
employment of a large number of people in the community or whether it generates
considerable revenues to the City; and
9) Whether retention of the use due to current market conditions would not impede or
delay the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
IX-16
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Objective LU-Q: Ensure that the effects of non-conforming structures on character of
the conforming patterns of Renton's neighborhoods are minimized.
Policy LU-71. Evaluate applications to repair or expand non-conforming structures
based on the following factors:
1) Whether it represents a unique regional or national architectural style or an innovation
in architecture, use of materials, or functional arrangement, and/or is one of the few
remaining examples of such a style or innovation,
2 Whether it is part of a unified streetscape of similar structures that is unlikely to be
replicated, unless the subject structure is rebuilt per, or similar to, its original plan;
3) Whether redevelopment of the site with a conforming structure is unlikely; and
4) The structure has been well-maintained and is not considered to be a threat to the
public health, welfare, or safety, or it could be retrofitted so as not to pose such a
threat.
IX-17
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
VI. PUBLIC FACILITIES
Goal: Develop a system of facilities that meet the public and quasi-public service
needs of present and future employees.
Discussion: The purpose of these policies is to address the aspect of a public/quasi
public use that is not addressed in the pertinent land use policies. Public facilities, also
includes quasi-public uses such as cultural and religious facilities. Facilities discussed in
this section vary widely in their size, function, service area, and impacts. For that reason,
these policies are aimed at addressing the generic impacts of all of the facilities and the
specific impacts of each. (Renton Technical College and Valley Medical Center are also
addressed in the Commercial Corridor section of the Land Use Element.)
Objective LU-R: Locate and plan for public facilities in ways that benefit a broad range
of potential public uses.
Policy LU-72. Facilities should be located within walking distance of an existing or
planned transit stop.
Policy LU-73. Primary vehicular access to sites should be from principal or minor
arterial streets.
Policy LU-74. Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian-oriented.
Policy LU-75. Manage public lands to protect and preserve the public trust.
Policy LU-76. Sites that are underused or developed with obsolete public uses should be
considered for another public use prior to changing uses.
Policy LU-77. Surplus public sites should be considered for alternative types of public
use prior to sale or lease.
Policy LU-78. A public involvement process should be established to review proposals
to change uses of surplus public properties.
Policy LU-79. Guide and modify development of essential public facilities to meet
Comprehensive Plan policies and to mitigate impacts and costs to the City.
Policy LU-80. Use public processes and create criteria to identify essential public
facilities. Public processes should include notification, hearings, and citizen
involvement. Criteria should be developed to review and assess proposals for public
facilities.
Objective LU-S: Site and design municipal facilities to provide the most efficient and
convenient service for people while minimizing adverse impacts on surrounding uses.
IX-18
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-81. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, trails, art work) should be
incorporated into municipal projects.
Policy LU-82. Municipal government functions that are people-intensive should be
centrally located in or near the Urban Center.
Policy LU-83. Fire stations should be located on principal or minor arterials.
Policy LU-84. Future fire stations should be sited central to their service area with as
few barriers as possible in order to achieve best possible response times.
Policy LU-85. Land for future fire stations should be acquired in advance in areas where
the greatest amount of development is anticipated.
Policy LU-86. Site and building design of police facilities providing direct service to the
general public should be easily accessible.
Policy LU-87. Major functions of the police should be centralized in or near the Urban
Center.
Policy LU-88. Satellite police facilities may be located outside of the Urban Center.
Objective LU-T: Site and design regional facilities to provide the most efficient and
convenient service for people while minimizing the adverse impacts on adj acent uses and
the City Urban Center.
Policy LU-89. Regional facilities that provide services on-site to the public on a daily
basis (i.e. office uses) should be located in the City's Urban Center.
Policy LU-90. Siting of regional facilities that are specialized (e.g. landfills,
maintenance shops) or serve a limited segment of the population(e.g.justice centers)
should rely more strongly on the special locational needs of the facility and the
compatibility of the facility with surrounding uses.
Objective LU-U: Preserve the cultural amenities and heritage of Renton.
Policy LU-91. The downtown library should continue to be the main facility for the
City.
Policy LU-92. When branch libraries are developed, they should be located to provide
convenient access to a majority of their users.
Policy LU-93. Future branch libraries and other satellite services may be located in
mixed-use developments to serve concentrations of users in those areas.
IX-19
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Objective LU-V: Assure adequate land and infrastructure at appropriate locations for
development and expansion of facilities to serve the educational needs of area residents
and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses.
Policy LU-94. Post secondary(beyond high school) and other regional educational
facilities that require sites larger than five acres should be located in the Employment
Area—Industrial, Employment Area—Valley, CommerciaUOffice/Residential, or the
Urban Center designations.
Policy LU-95. Alternative funding sources (e.g. impact fees) should be explored for
facilities necessitated by new development.
Policy LU-96. Schools in residential neighborhoods should consider mitigating adverse
impacts to the surrounding area in site planning and operations.
Policy LU-97. The City and the school district should jointly develop multiple-use
facilities (e.g. playgrounds, sports fields)whenever practical.
Policy LU-98. Community use of school sites and facilities for non-school activities
should be encouraged.
Policy LU-99. Facilities that are planned for closure, should be considered for potential
public use before being sold for private development.
Policy LU-100. Elementary schools should be located near a collector arterial street.
Policy LU-101. Safe pedestrian access to schools should be promoted(e.g. through
pedestrian linkages, safety features) through the design of new subdivisions and roadway
improvements.
Policy LU-102. Vehicular access to middle schools, senior high schools and other large-
scale facilities (e.g. bus maintenance shops, sports facilities) should be from arterial
streets.
Objective LU-W: Assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the
development and expansion of facilities to serve the health care needs of the area.
Policy LU-103. Health and/or medical facilities larger than five acres should be located
in portions of the Commercial Corridor designation mapped with Commercial Office
zoning, Employment Area—Valley, Commercial/Office/Residential or the Urban Centers
designations. Smaller scale facilities should locate in the Commercial Arterial portions
of Commercial Corridor.
Objective LU-X: Site religious and ancillary facilities in a manner that provides
convenient transportation access and minimizes their adverse impacts on adjacent land
uses.
Policy LU-104. When locating in predominantly residential areas,religious facilities
should be on the periphery of the residential area rather than the interior.
IX-20
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-105. Parking should be provided on-site and buffered from adjacent uses.
Policy LU-106. Large-scale facilities should be encouraged to locate contiguous to an
existing or planned transit route.
Policy LU-107. Religious facilities should be located on and have direct access to either
an arterial or collector street.
Objective LU-Y: Accommodate large commercial recreation that depends on open land
and is intended to serve consumer demands within a region.
Policy LU-108. Commercial recreational uses should be located contiguous to a
principal arterial in areas with immediate access to an interstate or a state route.
Policy LU-109. Commercial recreational uses should be located outside of the trade area
of other commercial recreational areas offering similar recreational opportunities.
Policy LU-110. Vehicular access to a commercial recreational site should be from a
principal arterial street with the number of access points minimized.
IX-21
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
VII. RESOURCE LAND
Goal: Maintain the City's agricultural and mining resources as part of Renton's
cultural history.
Discussion: Renton is an urban community with a rich history based on industrial and
agricultural uses that is now transitioning into a vibrant urban center. Some agricultural
resource-based uses remain in environmentally sensitive areas of the Potential
Annexation Area and in Residential Low Density Designations or on vacant land in
commercial areas. Current policies recognize these existing uses and encourage them as
cultural resources.
Objective LU-Z: Maintain existing commercial and hobby agricultural uses such as
small farms,hobby farms,horticulture,beekeeping, kennels, and stables, that are
compatible with urban development.
Policy LU-111. Prohibit commercial agricultural uses that are industrial or semi-
industrial in nature, and create nuisances such as odor or noise that may be incompatible
with residential use.
Policy LU-112. Limit access of large domestic animals to shorelines and wetlands.
Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004
Update.
Policy LU-113. Control impacts of crop and animal raising on surface and ground water.
Policy LU-114. Encourage public and private recreational uses in agricultural areas.
Policy LU-115. Allow cultivation and sale of flowers,herbs,vegetables, or similar crops
in residential areas, as an accessory use andlor home occupation. Implementation of this
policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-116. Recognize and allow community gardens on private property, vacant
public property, and unused rights-of-ways. Implementation of this policy should occur
within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
Objective LU-AA: Maintain extractive industries where their continued operation does
not impact adjacent residential areas, the City's aquifer, or other critical areas.
Policy LU-117. Extractive industries including timber, sand, gravel and other mining
within the City's Potential Annexation Area should be mapped and appropriately zoned
upon annexation to the City. Policies governing these sites should be consistent with the
King County Comprehensive Plan.
IX-22
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-118. Mining and processing of minerals and materials should be allowed
within the City subject to applicable City ordinances, environmental performance
standards.
Policy LU-119. Extractive sites, when mined out, should be regraded and restored for
future development compatible with land use designations for adjacent sites.
Implementing code will be in place within three ye�ars of the adoption of the 2004
Update.
Policy LU-120. New plats adj acent to operating extractive sites should carry a notice on
the face of the plat specifying the impacts that are expected from the extractive use:
potential dust, noise,traffic, light and glare.
Policy LU-121. Hours of operation of extractive uses should be based on impacts to
adjacent uses.
Policy LU-122. The City should apply conditional use permits or other approvals as
appropriate for mineral extraction and processing when:
1) The proposed site contains rock, sand, gravel, coal, oil, gas, or other mineral
resources,
2) The proposed site is large enough to confine or mitigate all operational impacts,
3) The proposal will allow operation with limited conflicts with adjacent land uses
when mitigating measures are applied, and;
4) Roads or rail facilities serving or proposed to serve the site can safely and
adequately handle transport of products and are in close proximity to the site.
IX-23
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
VIII. RESIDENTIAL POLICIES
Goal: Promote new development and neighborhoods in the City that:
10)Contribute to a strong sense of community and neighborhood identity;
11)Are walkable places where people can shop, play, and get to work without
always having to drive;
12)Are developed at densities sufficient to support public transportation and make
efficient use of urban services and infrastructure;
13)Offer a variety of housing types for a population diverse in age, income, and
lifestyle;
14)Are varied or unique in character;
15)Support"grid" and"flexible grid" street and pathway patterns where
appropriate;
16)Are visually attractive, safe, and healthy environments in which to live;
17)Offer connection to the community instead of isolation; and
18)Provide a sense of home.
Discussion: The purpose of the Residential policies is to provide a Citywide residential
growth strategy. The Residential policies address the location of housing development,
housing densities,non-residential uses allowed in residential areas, site design, and
housing types in neighborhoods. (See Public Facilities Section for policies on schools,
churches, and other facilities in residential areas. See Housing Element for policies
relating to housing types and neighborhoods and the Community Design Element for
policies guiding quality design.)
Objective LU-BB: Manage and plan for high quality residential growth in Renton and
the Potential Annexation Area that:
1) Supports transit by providing urban densities,
2) Promotes efficient land utilization, and
3) Creates stable neighborhoods incorporating built amenities and natural features.
Policy LU-123. Pursue multiple strategies for residential growth including:
1) Development of new neighborhoods on larger land tracts on the hills and plateaus
surrounding downtown;
2) Infill development on vacant and underutilized parcels in Renton's established
neighborhoods;
3) Multi-family development located in Renton's Urban Center;
4) Infill in existing multi-family areas; and
5) Mixed-use projects and multi-family development in CommerciaUOffice/Residential
and Commercial Corridars Land Use designations.
IX-24
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-124. Promote the timely and logical progression of residential development.
Priority for higher density development should be given to development of land with
infrastructure capacity and land located closer to the City's Urban Center.
Policy LU-125. Encourage a city-wide mix of housing types including:
1) Large-lot single family;
2) Small-lot single family;
3) Small-scale and large-scale rental and condominium multi-family housing; and
4) ResidentiaUcommercial mixed-use development.
Objective LU-CC: Maintain the goal of a fifty-fifty ratio of single family to multi-
family housing outside of the Urban Center.
Policy LU-126. A ma�cimum of fifty percent (50%) of future residential land capacity
should occur in multi-family housing in parts of the City and PAA located outside of the
Urban Center.
Policy LU-127. Infrastructure impacts of the goal of 50/50 ratio of single-family to
multi-family outside the Urban Center should be evaluated as part of the City's Capital
Improvements program.
Policy LU-128. Multi-family unit types are encouraged as part of mixed-use
developments in the Urban Center, Center Village, Commercial/Office/Residential, and
the Commercial Corridor Land Use designations.
Policy LU-129. Small-lot, single-family infill developments and plats should be
supported as alternatives to multi-family development to both increase the City's supply
of single-family detached housing and provide homeownership opportunities.
Policy LU-130. Adopt urban density of at least four(4) dwelling units per net acre for
residential uses except in areas with identified and documented sensitive areas and/or
areas identified as urban separators.
Policy LU-131. Encourage larger lot single-family development in areas providing a
transition to the Urban Growth Boundary and King County Rural Designation. The City
should discourage more intensive platting patterns in these areas.
Policy LU-132. Discourage creation of socio-economic enclaves, especially where lower
income units would be segregated within a development.
ix-2s
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELENIENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: Policies in this section are intended to guide development on land
appropriate for a range of low intensity residential and employment where land is either
constrained by sensitive areas or where the City has the opportunity to add larger-lot
housing stock, at urban densities of 4-du/net acre, to its inventory.
Lands that are not appropriate for urban levels of development are designated either
Resource Conservation or Residential Low Density Zoning.
Lands that either do not have significant sensitive areas, or can be adequately protected
by the critical axeas ordinance, are zoned Residential4.
Objective LU-DD: Provide for a range of lifestyles and appropriate uses adjacent to and
compatible with urban development in areas of the City and Potential Annexation Area
constrained by extensive natural features,providing urban separators and/or providing a
transition to Rural Designations within King County.
Policy LU-133. Identify and map areas of the City where environmentally sensitive
areas such as 100-year floodplains, floodways, and hazardous landslide and erosion areas
are extensive and the application of critical areas regulations alone is insufficient to guide
future development.
Policy LU-134. Base development densities should range from 1 home per 10 acres
(Resource Conservation) to 1 home per acre (Residential 1) on Residential Low Density
(RLD) designated land with significant environmental constraints, including but not
limited to: steep slopes, erosion hazard, floodplains, and wetlands or where the area is in
a designated Urban Separator. Density should be a maximum of 4-du/net acre
(Residential4) on portions of the Residential Low Density land where these constraints
are not extensive and urban densities are appropriate.
Policy LU-135. For the purpose of mapping four dwelling units per net acre (4-du/ac)
zoned areas as contrasted with lower density Residential 1 (R-1) and Resource
Conservation(RC) areas, the prevalence of significant environmental constraints should
be interpreted to mean:
1) Critical areas encumber a significant percentage of the gross area;
2) Developable areas are separated from one another by pervasive critical areas or occur
on isolated portions of the site and access limitations exist;
3) The location of the sensitive area results in a non-contiguous development pattern;
4) The area is a designated urban separator; or
5) Application of the Critical Areas Ordinance setbacks/buffers and/or net density
definition would create a situation where the allowed density could not be
accommodated on the remaining net developable area without modifications or
variances to other standards.
IX-26
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Implementation of this policy should be phased in within three years of the adoption of
the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-136. Rural activities, such as agricultural and animal husbandry, should be
allowed.
Policy LU-137. Warehousing, outdoor storage, equipment yards, and industrial uses
should not be allowed. Where such uses exist as non-conforming uses, measures should
be taken to negotiate the transition of these uses as residential redevelopment occurs.
Policy LU-138. To provide for more efficient development patterns and maximum
preservation of open space, residential development may be clustered and/or lot sizes
reduced within allowed density levels in Residential Low Density designations.
Implementation of this policy should be phased in within two years of the adoption of the
2004 Update.
Policy LU-139. Minimize impacts of animal and crop-raising on adjacent residential
uses and critical areas such as wetlands, streams, and rivers.
Policy LU-140. Control scale and density of accessory buildings and barns to maintain
compatibility with other residential uses.
Policy LU-141. Residential Low Density areas may be incorporated into Urban
Separators.
Policy LU-142. Undeveloped portions of Residential Low Density areas may be
considered for designation of trail easements or other public benefits through agreements
with private parties.
Objective LU-EE: Designate Residential4 du/acre zoning in those portions of the RLD
designation appropriate for urban levels of development by providing suitable
environments for suburban and/or estate style, single-family residential dwellings.
Policy LU-143. Within the Residential4 du/acre zoned area allow a maximum density
of 4 units per net acre to encourage larger lot development and increase the supply of
upper income housing consistent with the City's Housing Element.
Policy LU-144. Ensure quality development by supporting site plans and plats that
incorporate quality building and landscaping standards.
Policy LU-145. Interpret development standards to support projects with higher quality
housing by requiring:
1) A variety of compatible housing styles making up block fronts;
2) Additional architectural features such as pitched roofs, roof overhangs, and/or
decorative cornices, fenestration and trim; and
ix-2�
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
� 3) Building modulation and use of durable exterior materials such as wood, masonry,
stucco, or brick.
Policy LU-146. Interpret development standards to support provision of landscape
features as well as innovative site planning. Criteria should include:
1) Attractive residential streetscapes with landscaped front yards that are visible from
the street;
2) Landscaping, preferably with drought- resistant evergreen plant materials;
3) Large caliper street trees;
4) Irrigated landscape planting strips;
5) Low-impact development using landscaped buffers, open spaces, and other pervious
surfaces; and
6) Significant native tree and vegetation retention and/or replacement.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to
be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at
urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and
rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully desig,ned to enhance and improve the
quality of single-family living environments.
Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional
Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community
Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with R-8 zoning.
Objective LU-FF: Encourage re-investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and
development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that:
1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets,
2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and
3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0
dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods.
Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill
parcels of less than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a
reduction in lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an
incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the
standard for density in the designation,but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat
design and facilitate development within the allowed density range.
Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and
driveway easements, except alley easements.
IX-28
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-150. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal access areas,
established through or to a lot, and pazking areas.
Policy LU-151. Maximum height of structures should not exceed two (2) stories in
single-family residential neighborhoods.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface
should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy
without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
Policy LU-153. Interpret development standards to support plats designed to incorporate
vehicular and pedestrian connections between plats and neighborhoods. Small projects
composed of single parcels and/or multiple parcels of insufficient size to provide such
connections, should include future street stubs. Future street connections should be
clearly identified to notify residents of future roadway connections.
Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project
designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that
address privacy and quality of life for existing residents.
Policy LU-155. New plats proposed at higher densities than adjacent neighborhood
developments may be modified within the allowed density range to reduce conflicts
between old and new development patterns. However, strict adherence to older standards
is not required.
Policy LU-156. Interpret development standards to support projects incorporating site
features such as distinctive stands of trees and natural slopes that can be retained to
enhance neighborhood character and preserve property values where possible.
Replanting should occur where trees are not retained due to safety concerns. Retention of
unique site features should be balanced with the objective of investing in neighborhoods
within the overall context of the Vision Statement of this Comprehensive Plan.
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The Residential Medium Density designation is intended to create
the opportunity for neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes,housing, and
ownership options.
Residential Medium Density neighborhoods should include a variety of unit types
designed to incorporate features from both single-family and multi-family developments,
support cost-efficient housing, facilitate infill development, encourage use of transit
service, and promote the efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Objective LU-GG: Designate land for Residential Medium Density(RMD)where
access, topography and adjacent land uses create conditions appropriate for a variety of
IX-29
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
unit types designed to incorporate features from both single-family and multi-family
developments, and to support cost-efficient housing, infill development, transit service,
and the efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Policy LU-157. Residential Medium Density designated areas should be zoned for either
Residential 10 dwelling units per net acre (R-10), Residential 14 dwelling units per net
acre (R-14), or new zoning designations that allow housing in this density range.
Policy LU-158. Residential Medium Density neighborhoods may be considered for
Residential 10(R-10)zoning if they meet three of the following criteria:
1) The area already has a mix of small-scale multi-family units or has had long standing
zoning for flats or other low-density multi-family use;
2) Development patterns conducive to medium-density development are established;
3) Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential for medium-density infill
development;
4) The project site is adjacent to major arterial(s) and public transit service is located
within '/4 mile;
5) The site can be buffered from existing single-family residential neighborhoods having
densities of eight (8) dwelling units or less; or
6) The site can be buffered from adjacent or abutting incompatible uses.
Policy LU-159. Areas may be considered for Residential 14 (R-14) Zoning where the
site meets the following criteria:
1) Adj acent to maj or arterial(s);
2) Adjacent to the Urban Center, Highlands Neighborhood Center, or Commercial
Corridor designations;
3) Part of a designation totaling over 20 acres (acreage may be in separate ownership);
4) Site is buffered from single-family areas or other existing,potentially incompatible
uses; and
5) Development within the density range and of similar unit type is achievable given
environmental constraints.
Policy LU-160. Support projects that create neighborhoods with diverse housing types
that achieve continuity through the organization of roads, sidewalks,blocks, setbacks,
community gathering places, and amenity features.
Policy LU-161. Support residential development incorporating a hierarchy of streets.
Street networks should connect through the development to existing streets, avoid"cul-
de-sac"or dead end streets, and be arranged in a grid street pattern (or a flexible grid
street system if there are environmental constraints).
IX-30
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-162. Development densities in the Residential Medium Density designation
area should range from seven(7)to eighteen(18) dwelling units per net acre, as specified
by implementing zoning.
Policy LU-163. For attached or semi-attached development in the R-14 zoned portions
of the Residential Medium Density designation, a bonus density of 18 dwelling units per
acre should be available, subject to Density Bonus Review and other applicable
development conditions.
Policy LU-164. When a minimum density is applicable, the minimum development
density in the Residential Medium Density designation should be four(4) dwelling units
per net acre.
Objective LU-HH: Residential Medium Density designations should be areas where
creative approaches to housing density can be implemented.
Policy LU-165. Provision of small lot, single-family detached unit types, townhouses,
and multi-family structures compatible with a single-family character should be allowed
and encouraged in the Residential Medium Density designation,provided that density
standards can be met(see also the Housing Element for housing types).
Policy LU-166. Very small-lot single-family housing, such as cottages, zero-lot line
detached, semi-detached, townhouses, and small scale multi-family units should be
allowed in the Residential Medium Density designation in order to provide a wide range
of housing types. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the
adoption of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-167. A range and variety of lot sizes and building densities should be
encouraged.
Policy LU-168. Residential developments should include public amenities that function
as a gathering place within the development and should include features such as a public
square, open space,park, civic or commercial uses in the R-14 zone. The central place
should include passive amenities such as benches and fountains, and be unified by a
design motif or common theme.
Policy LU-169. Residential Medium Density site development plans having attached or
semi-attached housing types should reflect the following criteria for projects:
1) Parking should be encouraged in the rear or side yards or under the structure;
2) Structures should be located on lots or arranged in a manner to appear like a platted
development to ensure adequate light and air, and views (if any) are preserved
between lots or structures;
3) Buildings should be massed in a manner that promotes a pedestrian scale with a small
neighborhood feeling;
4) Each dwelling unit should have an identifiable entrance and front on streets rather
than courtyards and parking lots;
IX-31
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
5) Fences may be constructed if they contribute to an open, spacious feeling between
units and structures; and
6) Streetscapes should include green, open space for each unit.
Policy LU-170. Residential Medium Density development should provide condominium
or fee simple homeownership opportunities, as well as rental or lease options.
Objective LU-II: Residential Medium Density development should be urban in form
and fit into existing residential neighborhoods if developed as infill projects.
Policy LU-171. Buildings should front the street rather than be organized around interior
courtyards or parking areas.
Policy LU-172. Non-residential structures, such as community recreation buildings, that
are part of the development, may have dimensions larger than residential structures,but
should be compatible in design and dimensions with surrounding residential
development.
Policy LU-173. Non-residential structures should be clustered and connected within the
overall development through the organization of roads,blocks, yards, focal points, and
amenity features to create a neighborhood.
Policy LU-174. Single-family detached building types in the Residential Medium
Density designation should have a maximum lot coverage by the primary structure of
fifty(50)percent.
Policy LU-175. In the Residential Medium Density designation common open space
equal to 1,200-square feet per unit and maintained by a homeowners' association, should
be provided for each semi-attached or attached unit.
Policy LU-176. Support site plans that transition to and blend with existing development
patterns using techniques such as lot size, depth and width, access points, building
location setbacks, and landscaping. Sensitivity to unique features and differences among
established neighborhoods should be reflected in site plan design. Interpret development
standards to support ground-related orientation, coordinated structural design, and private
yards or substantial common space areas.
Policy LU-177. A minimum of fifty(50)percent of a project in the Residential 14 zone
should consist of the following primary residential types: traditional detached, zero lot
line detached, or townhouses with individual yards that are scaled appropriately for each
unit.
Policy LU-178. Longer townhouse buildings or other types of multi-family buildings,
considered secondary residential types (see RMC 4-9-065), should be limited in size so
that the mass and bulk of the building has a small scale multi-family character,rather
than a large, garden-style apartment development.
IX-32
CITY OF 12ENTON LAND USE ELENtENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-179. In the Residential 14 zone, multi-unit townhouses that qualify as a
primary residential type (see RMC 4-9-065) should be limited in size so that the mass and
bulk is at a human scale.
Policy LU-180. Projects in a Residential 14 zone should have no more than fifty(50)
percent of the units designed as secondary residential types, i.e. longer townhouse
building clusters, or longer multi-family buildings of other types.
Policy LU-181. Mixed-use development in the form of civic, commercial development,
or other non-residential structures,may be allowed in the central places of Residential
Medium Density development projects within the Residential 14 zone, subject to
compliance with criteria established through development regulations.
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The multi-family residential land use designation is intended to
encourage a range of multi-family living environments that provide shelter for a wide
variety of people in differing living situations, from all income levels, and in all stages of
life.
Although some people live in multi-family situations because they do not have an
alternative, others prefer living in multi-family environments rather than in single-family,
detached houses. Regardless of why they live there, they want and deserve the same high
standards for their homes and neighborhoods.
Single-family and multi-family residential developments have different impacts on the
community.
The City must identify a housing mix and implement policies that adequately address and
balance the needs of both residents and the community as a whole.
The Multi-family�esidential designation is implemented by Residential Multi-family
(RM�zoning. - C,.�
Objective LU-JJ: Encourage the development of infill parcels with quality projects in
existing multi-family districts.
Policy LU-182. Residential Multi-family designations should be in areas of the City
where projects would be compatible with existing uses and where infrastructure is
adequate to handle impacts from higher density uses.
Policy LU-183. Land within the Residential Multi-family designation areas should be
used to meet multi-family housing needs, without expanding the area boundaries, until
land capacity in this designation is used. Residential Multi-family designations have the
highest priority for development or redevelopment with multi-family uses.
Policy LU-184. Expansion of the Residential Multi-family designation is limited to
properties meeting the following criteria:
IX-33
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
� 1) Properties under consideration should take access from a principal arterial, minor
arterial, or collector. Direct access should not be through a less intense land use
designation area;
2) Properties under consideration must abut an existing Residential Multi-family land
use designation on at least two (2) sides and be on the same side of the principal
arterial, minor arterial, or collector serving it; and
3) Any such expansion of the Residential Multi-family land use designation should not
bisect or truncate another contiguous land use district.
Policy LU-185. Development density in the Residential Multi-family designation should
be within a range of ten(10) dwelling units per acrP as a minimum to twenty(20)
dwelling units per acre as a maximum.
Objective LU-KK: Due to increased impacts to privacy and personal living space
inherent in higher density living environments, new development should be designed to
create a high quality living environment.
Policy LU-186. New stacked flat and townhouse development in Residential Multi-
family designations should be compatible in size, scale,bulk, use, and design with
existing multi-family developments in the vicinity.
Policy LU-187. Detached cottage housing designed to include site amenities with
common open space features should be supported in multi-family designations if density
goals are met. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption
of the 2004 Update.
Policy LU-188. Evaluate project proposals in Resi�ential Multi-family designations to
consider the transition to lower density uses where;multi-family sites abut lower density
zones. Setbacks may be increased,heights reduced, and additional landscape buffering
required through site plan review. Implementing cade will be put in place within three
years of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
1) In order to increase the potential compatibility of multi-family projects, with other
projects of similar use and density,minimum setbacks for side yards should be
proportional to the total lot width, i.e. wider lots should require larger setback
dimensions;
2) Taller buildings (greater than two stories) should have larger side yard setback
dimensions; and
3) Heights of buildings should be limited to three stories and thirty-five (35) feet, unless
greater heights can be demonstrated to be compatible with existing buildings on
abutting and adjacent lots.
Objective LU-LL: New Residential Multi-family projects should demonstrate provision
of an environment that contributes to a high quality of life far future residents, regardless
of income level. Implementing code will be put in place within two years of the adoption
of the 2004 Update.
IX-34
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-189. Support project design that incorporates the following, or similar
elements, in architectural design:
1) Variation of facades on all sides of structures visible from the street with vertical and
horizontal modulation or articulation;
2) Angular roof lines on multiple planes and with roof edge articulation such as
modulated cornices;
3) Private entries from the public sidewalk fronting the building for ground floor units;
4) Ground floor units elevated from sidewalk level;
5) Upper-level access interior to the building;
6) Balconies that serve as functional open space for individual units; and
7) Common entryways with canopy or similar feature.
Policy LU-190. Support project site planning that incorporates the following, or similar
elements, in order to meet the intent of the obj ective:
1) Buildings oriented toward public streets,
2) Private open space for ground-related units,
3) Common open or green space in sufficient amount to be useful,
4) Preferably underground parking or structured parking located under the residential
building,
5) Surface parking, if necessary, to be located to the side or rear of the residential
building(s),
6) Landscaping of all pervious areas of the property, and
7) Landscaping, consisting of groundcover and street trees (at a minimum), of all
setbacks and rights-of way abutting the property.
Implementation of this policy should be phased within three years of the adoption of the
2004 Update.
Policy LU-191. Residential Multi-family projects in the RMF zone should have a
maximum site coverage by buildings of thirty-five (35)percent, or forty-five (45)percent
if greater coverage can be demonstrated to be both mitigated on site with amenities and
compatible with existing buildings on abutting and adjacent lots.
Policy LU-192. Residential Multi-family projects should have maximum site coverage
by impervious materials of seventy-five (75)percent.
IX-35
CITY OF R�NTON LAND USE ELE1ViENT ORDINANCE N0. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
IX. CENTERS
Goal: Develop well-balanced attractive, convenient, robust commercial office,
office, and residential development within desigrnated Centers serving the City and
the region.
Discussion: The Centers category of land use includes two areas of the City, the Center
Village in the Highlands and the Urban Center located in the historic downtown and the
employment area north to Lake Washington. The Urban Center includes two sub-areas:
Urban Center-Downtown(220 acres) and the Urban Center-North (310 acres). Together
these two areas are envisioned to evolve into a vibrant city core that provides arts,
entertainment, regional employment opportunities,recreation, and quality urban
residential neighborhoods. The Renton Urban Center is envisioned as the dynamic heart
of a growing regional city. Renton's Urban Center will provide significant capacity for
new housing in order to absorb the city's share of future regional growth. This residential
population will help to balance the City's employment population and thereby meet the
policy directive of a 2:1 ratio of jobs to housing.
The Center Village designation is envisioned as a r�vitalized residential and commercial
area providing goods and services to the Greater Highlands area. The area could
potentially become a focal point for a larger area, the Coal Creek Corridor, connecting
Renton to Newcastle to Issaquah. While development is envisioned at a smaller scale
than expected in the Urban Center, the Village Center will still focus on urban mixed-use
projects with a pedestrian oriented development pattern.
Objective LU-MM: Encourage a wide range and combination of uses, developed at
sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, support transit use, and create a
viable district.
Policy LU-193. Promote the innovative site planning and clustering of Center uses and
discourage the development of strip commercial areas.
Policy LU-194. Phase implementation of development within Centers to support
economically feasible development in the short term but also provide a transition to
achieve new development consistent with long terrr�land use objectives.
Policy LU-195. Designate Center boundaries according to the following criteria:
1) The boundary should coincide with a major change in land use type or intensity;
2) Boundaries should consider topography and natural features such as ravines,hills,
and significant stands of trees;
3) Boundaries should occur along public rights-of-way including streets or utility
easements, or at rear property lines where justified by the existing land use pattern.
Boundary lines should not be drawn through the interior of parcels; and
4) As a maximum distance, the boundary should be drawn within a walkable distance
from one or two focal points, which may be defined by intersections, transit stops, or
shopping centers.
IX-36
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-196. Designate Centers in locations with the following characteristics:
1) A nucleus of existing multi-use development;
2) Potential for redevelopment, or vacant land to encourage significant concentration of
development;
3) Center locations should be located on major transit and transportation routes;
4) Center locations should be served by the City's arterial street system.
Policy LU-197. Change adopted boundaries only in the following circumstances:
1) The original mapping failed to consider a major natural feature or significant land use
that would make implementation of the boundary illogical, or
2) The amount of land within a Center is inadequate to allow development of the range
and intensity of uses envisioned for the Center.
Policy LU-198. Support new office and commercial development that is more intensive
than the older office and commercial development in existing Centers in order to create
more compact and efficient Centers over time.
Policy LU-199. Allow stand-alone residential development of various types and urban
densities in portions of Centers not conducive to commercial development, or in the
Urban Center in districts designated for residential use.
Policy LU-200. Allow residential uses throughout Centers as part of mixed-use
developments. Consider bonus incentives for housing types compatible with commercial
uses or lower density residential that is adjacent to Centers.
Policy LU-201. Include uses that are compatible with each other within mixed-use
developments; for example, office and certain retail uses with residential, office, and
retail.
Policy LU-202. Locate and design commercial uses within a residential mixed-use
development in a manner that preserves privacy and quiet for residents.
Policy LU-203. Modify existing commercial and residential uses that are adjacent to or
within new proposed development to implement the new Center land use vision as much
as possible through alterations in parking lot design, landscape, signage, and site plan as
redevelopment opportunities occur.
Policy LU-204. Consolidate signage for mixed-use development.
Policy LU-205. Identify major natural features and support development of new focal
points that define the Center and are visually distinctive.
Policy LU-206. Design focal points to include a combination of public areas such as
parks or plazas, architectural features such as towers, outstanding building design, transit
stops, or outdoor eating areas. These features should be connected to pedestrian
pathways if possible.
Policy LU-207. Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to
create focal points.
IX-37
CiTY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.l 1-01-04
, Policy LU-208. Consolidate access to existing streets and provide internal vehicular
circulation that supports shared access.
Policy LU-209. Locate parking for residential uses in the mixed-use developments to
minimize disruption of pedestrian or auto access to the retail component of the project.
Policy LU-210. Connect residential uses to other uses in the Center through design
features such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces.
Objective NN: Implement Renton's Urban Center consistent with the"Urban Centers
criteria"of the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP)to create an area of concentrated
employment and housing with direct service by high capacity transit and a wide range of
land uses such as commerciaUoffice/retail,recreation,public facilities, parks and open
space.
Policy LU-211. Renton's Urban Center should be maintained and redeveloped with
supporting land use decisions and projects that accomplish the following objectives:
1) Enhance existing neighborhoods by creating investment opportunities in quality
urban scale development;
2) Promote housing opportunities close to employment and commercial areas;
3) Support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on
automobiles;
4) Strive for urban densities that use land more efficiently;
5) M�imize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services;
6) Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; and
7) Evaluate and mitigate environmental impacts.
Policy LU-212. Establish two sub-areas within Re�ton's Urban Center.
1) Urban Center-Downtown (UC-D) is Renton's historic commercial district,
surrounded by established residential neighborhoods. The UC-D is located from the
Cedar River south to South 7th Street and between I-405 on the east and Shattuck
Avenue South on the west.
2) Urban Center—North (UC-N) is the area that includes Southport, the Puget Sound
Energy sub-station, and the South Lake Washington redevelopment area. The UC-N
is located generally from Lake Washington on the north, the Cedar River and Renton
Municipal Airport to the west, Sixth Street and Renton Stadium to the south, and
Houser Way to the east.
Policy LU-213. Maintain zoning that creates capacity for employment levels of 50
employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within the
Urban Center.
Policy LU-214: Support developments that utilize Urban Center levels of capacity.
Where market conditions do not support Urban Center employment and residential levels,
support site planning and/or phasing alternatives that demonstrate how, over time, infill
or redevelopment can meet Urban Center objectives.
Policy LU-215. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with
provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate.
IX-38
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
URBAN CENTER DOWNTOWN LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The Urban Center- Downtown(UC-D) is expected to redevelop as
a destination shopping area providing neighborhood, citywide, and sub-regional services
and mixed-use residential development. UC-D residential development is expected to
support urban scale multi-family projects at high densities, consistent with Urban Center
policies. Projects in the UC-D are expected to inccrporate mixed-uses including retail,
office, residential, and service uses that support transit and further the synergism of
public and private sector activities. In the surrounc�ing neighborhoods, infill urban scale
townhouse and multi-family residential developments are anticipated. Site planning and
infrastructure will promote a pedestrian scale environment and amenities.
Objective LU-00: Create a balance of land uses that contribute to the revitalization of
downtown Renton and, with the designated Urban Center-North, fulfill the requirements
of an Urban Center as defined by Countywide Planning Policies.
Policy LU-216. Uses in the Urban Center powntown should include a dynamic mix of
uses, including retail, entertainment, restaurant, office, and residential, that contribute to a
vibrant city core.
Policy LU-217. Development and redevelopment of Urban Center powntown should
strive for urban density and intensity of uses.
Policy LU-218. Ground floor uses with street frontage along Wells Avenue South
between Houser Way and South 2nd Street and along South 3rd Street between Main
Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South should be limited to businesses which primarily
cater to walk-in customer traffic (i.e. retail goods and services) in order to generate and
maintain continuous pedestrian activity in these areas. Walk-in customer oriented
businesses should also be encouraged to locate along street frontages in the remainder of
the downtown core.
Policy LU-219. Projects in the Urban Center-Downtown should achieve an urban
density and intensity of development that is greater than typical suburban neighborhoods.
Characteristics of urban intensity include no or little setbacks, taller structures, mixed-
uses, structured parking, and urban plazas and amenities within buildings.
Policy LU-220. Non-conforming uses should transition to conforming uses. Non-
conforming structures should be re-used to house conforming uses unless the size and
scale of the structure significantly limits the intensity and quality of development that can
be achieved.
Policy LU-221. Development should not exceed mid-rise heights (maximuml0 stories)
within the Urban Center-Downtown.
Objective LU-PP: Encourage the evolution of downtown Renton as a regional
commercial district that complements the redevelopment expected to occur in the Urban
Center-North.
IX-39
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-222. Automobile-related sales and service uses that require large amounts of
land and currently exist within the Urban Center—Downtown should be encouraged to
locate in the City's "Auto Mall" located outside of the Urban Center-Downtown or to
consolidate their sites and provide multi-storied facilities. New automobile-related sales
and service uses should be discouraged from locating in the Urban Center- Downtown.
Policy LU-223. Discourage uses including expansion of existing uses in the Urban
Center-Downtown that require large areas of surface parking and/or drive-through
service queuing space.
Objective LU-QQ: Encourage additional residential development in the Urban Center-
Downtown supporting the Countywide Planning Policies definition of Urban Center.
Policy LU-224. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and
revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high-density residential
development in the downtown area. Allowed densities should conform to the criteria for
Urban Centers in the countywide policies.
Policy LU-225. Mixed-use development where rec�idential and commercial uses are
allowed in the same building or on the same site, should be encouraged in the urban
Center-Downtown. Incentives should be developed to encourage future development ar
redevelopment projects that incorporate residential uses.
Policy LU-226. Net residential development densities in the Urban Center-Downtown
designation should achieve a range of 14-100 dwelling units per acre and vary by zoning
district.
Policy LU-227. Density bonuses up to 150 du/ac may be granted within designated areas
for provision of, or contribution to, a public amenity(e.g. passive recreation, public art)
or provision of additional structured public parking.
Policy LU-228. Condominium development and high-density owner-occupied
townhouse development is encouraged in the Urban Center- Downtown.
Objective LU-RR: Recognize the following Downtown Districts reflecting varying
development standards and uses that distinguish these areas.
1) Downtown Pedestrian District;
2) Downtown Core;
3) South Renton's Williams-Wells Subarea(see South Renton Neighborhood Plan);
4) South Renton's Burnett Park Subarea(see South Renton Neighborhood Plan); and
5) Cedar River Subarea north of the Downtown Core.
Policy LU-229. Encourage the most intensive development in the Downtown Pedestrian
District and Downtown Core with a transition to lower-scale commercial and residential
projects in areas surrounding the Downtown Core.
Policy LU-230. Ground-floor uses with street frontage in the Downtown Pedestrian
District should be limited to businesses that primarily cater to walk-in customer traffic
IX-40
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
(i.e. retail goods and services) in order to generate and maintain continuous pedestrian
activity in these areas.
Policy LU-231. Walk-in customer-oriented businesses should be encouraged to locate
along street frontages in the Downtown Core Area and the portion of the Urban Center-
Downtown located west of it.
Policy LU-232. Medium-rise residential (6-10 stories) should be located within the
Cedar River Subarea, primarily between the Cedar River and South 2nd, and between
South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way.
Policy LU-233. The area between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-
of-way should include a combination of low- (1-5 stories) and medium-rise residential to
provide a transition between the employment area and the mixed-use core.
Policy LU-234. Specific streetscapes, development standards, and design guidelines for
the South Renton Neighborhood are outlined in the South Renton Neighborhood Plan
within the Subarea Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan.
Objective LU-SS: Promote a reasonable balance between parking supply and parking
demand within the downtown.
Policy LU-235. Parking should be structured whenever feasible. Accessory surface
parking is discouraged.
Policy LU-236. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage
joint use rather than parking for each individual business.
Policy LU-237. Downtown parking standards should recognize the different demands
and requirements of both local and regional commercial parking versus those of office
and residential uses.
Policy LU-238. Alternatives to individual on-site�arking that encourage efficient use of
urban land(e.g. fees in lieu of parking, multiple-use or shared parking leased off-site
parking, car-sharing) should be encouraged.
Policy LU-239. Parking standards and requests for parking modifications for downtown
residents should reflect the market demand of urban residential uses, taking into account
transit service availability, car-sharing availability, and other transportation demand
management tools available.
Policy LU-240. In order to maximize on-street parking availability in the downtown,
loading and delivery areas for downtown uses should be consolidated and limited to
alleys, other off-street areas, or city-designated on-street loading zones. Alley and off-
street loading and delivery areas should be screened from view of the street.
Policy LU-241. Alleys should be maintained in the Urban Center- Downtown in order
to facilitate use of alley-accessed parking areas, freight delivery, and removal of refuse
and recyclables.
Objective LU-TT: Develop a transit circulation/distribution system that provides
convenient connections between downtown and residential, employment, and other
commercial areas within the Renton planning area.
IX-41
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-242. Transit should link the downtown with other parts of the Urban Center,
other commercial activity areas, and the City's major employment areas to encourage use
of the downtown by those employees both during and after work hours.
Policy LU-243. Future development and improvements in the Urban Center—
Downtown should emphasize non-automobile oriented travel both to and within the
downtown, while maintaining an adequate amount of parking for regional retail
customers. Transit and parking programs should be integrated, balanced, and
implemented concurrently.
Policy LU-244. Both intercity and intra-city transit should be focused at the Renton
Transit Center, the multi-modal transit facility loca�ed in the Downtown Core Area.
Policy LU-245. Permanent park and ride facilities in the Urban Center-Downtown
should use structured parking garages and support the Transit Center.
Policy LU-246. Continue development of transit-oriented development in the activity
node established by the downtown transit facility.
Policy LU-247. Seek ways of improving speed and reliability of transit serving Renton's
Downtown.
Policy LU-248. Transit span of service should increase as Downtown Renton adds
evening entertainment, dining, and recreation opportunities.
Objective LU-UU: Improve the City's pedestrian and bicycle network to increase access
to and circulation within the Urban Center-Downt�wn.
Policy LU-249. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the
downtown. �
Policy LU-250. Pedestrians should be given priority use of sidewalks within the Urban
Center—Downtown designated pedestrian areas.
Policy LU-251. Block lengths and widths should be maintained at the pedestrian-
friendly standards that predominate within the downtown.
Policy LU-252. Where right-of-way is available and bicycle demand justify them,
bicycle lanes should be marked and signed to accommodate larger volumes of bicycle
traffic on select streets designated by the City.
Policy LU-253. Secure bicycle parking facilities, such as bike lockers and bike racks
should be provided at residential, commercial, and public establishments to encourage
bicycle use.
Objective LU-VV: Improve the visual,physical and experiential quality, lighting and
safety, especially for pedestrians, along downtown streets.
Policy LU-254. Strong visual linkages should be created between downtown Renton and
neighborhoods using landscaped arterial streets and connectors.
IX-42
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-255. Buildings along South 3rd Street between Main and Burnett Avenues
should retain a pedestrian scale by employing design techniques that maintain the
appearance and feel of low-rise structures to avoid creation of the "canyon effect" (e.g.
preserving historic fa�ades, stepping fa�ades back above the second or third floor).
Policy LU-256. Downtown gateways should employ distinctive landscaping, signage,
art, architectural style, and similar techniques to better delineate the downtown and
enhance its unique character.
Policy LU-257. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and
other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses.
Objective LU-WW: Improve the visual and physical appearance of buildings to create a
more positive image for downtown.
Policy LU-258. Site and building designs, (e.g. signage; building height,bulk and
setback; landscaping; and parking, should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense
of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses.
Policy LU-259. Incentives should be developed to encourage rehabilitation(e.g. facade
restoration) of older downtown buildings.
Objective LU-XX: Maintain and expand the available amenities to make the Urban
Center- Downtown more appealing to existing and potential customers, residents, and
employees.
Policy LU-260. Design guidelines should assist developers in creating attractive projects
that add value to the downtown community, attract new residents, employees, and
visitors, and foster a unique downtown identity.
Policy LU-261. Design guidelines may vary by zone within the downtown area to
recognize and foster unique identities for the different land use areas (i.e. South Renton's
Burnett Park subarea).
Policy LU-262. New downtown parks should complement existing park facilities and be
compatible with planned trails. Trails should be integrated with the existing trail system.
Policy LU-263. Urban Center-Downtown development should be designed to take
advantage of existing unique downtown amenities such as the Cedar River, City parks
and trails, the downtown Transit Center, IKEA Perf'orming Arts Center, and Renton High
School.
Policy LU-264. Public amenities such as art, fountains, or similar features should be
incorporated into the design of public areas, major streets and gateways of the Urban
Center-Downtown.
URBAN CENTER NORTH LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The purpose of the UC-N is to redevelop industrial land for new
office,residential, and commercial uses at a sufficient scale to implement the Urban
Centers criteria adopted in the Countywide Planning Policies. This portion of the Urban
IX-43
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
� Center is anticipated to attract large-scale redevelopment greater than that in the Urban
Center-Downtown, due to the large available land holdings under single ownership. In
, addition, this new development is expected to include a wider group of uses including
remaining industrial activities, new research and development facilities, laboratories,
retail integrated into pedestrian-oriented shopping districts, and a range of urban-scale
mixed-use residential, office and commercial uses. The combined uses will generate
significant t� income for the City and provide jobs to balance the capacity for the more
than 5,000 additional households in the Urban Center. Development is expected to
complement the Urban Center-Downtown. UC-N policies will provide a blueprint for the
transition of land over the next 30 years into this dynamic, urban mixed-use district.
Policy LU-265. Support more urban intensity of development(e.g. building height,bulk,
landscaping, parking standards)than with land uses in the suburban areas of the City
outside the Urban Center.
Policy LU-266. Achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's tax and employment
base.
Policy LU-267. Support a range and variety of commercial and office uses.
Policy LU-268. Allow hospitality uses such as hotels, convention and conference
centers.
Policy LU-269. Co-locate uses within a site and/or building in order to promote urban
style, mixed-use development.
Policy LU-270. Support incorporation of public facilities such as schools, museums,
medical offices, and government offices into redevelopment efforts by developing a
public/private partnership with developers and other Renton stakeholders such as the
school district, technical college, and hospital district.
Policy LU-271. Support uses that sustain minimum Urban Center employment levels of
50 employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within
the entire Urban Center.
Policy LU-272. Support uses that serve the region, a sub-regional, or citywide market as
well as the surrounding neighborhoods.
Policy LU-273. Support integration of community-scale office and service uses
including restaurants,theaters, day care, art museums and studios.
Policy LU-274. Support transit stations and transit usage connecting to a system of park
and ride lots outside the Urban Center-North. Support park and ride facilities within the
Urban Center only when they are included in structured parking as a stand-alone use or
are developed as part of a mixed-use project.
Policy LU-275. Support an expanded and extended public right-of-way in the vicinity of
the present Logan Avenue to provide new arterial access within the Urban Center.
Additionally, this will provide a physical buffer between redevelopment and continuing
airplane manufacturing operations.
Policy LU-276. Support extension of Park Ave. to Lake Washington.
IX-44
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-277. Recognize the need for secure limited access within large manufacturing
facilities by retaining private drives and roads in axeas where airplane manufacturing
operations continue.
Policy LU-278. Support creation of a significant gateway feature within gateway nodes
as shown on the Urban Center-North Gateway Map.
Policy LU-279. Support private/public partnerships to plan and finance infrastructure
development,public uses and amenities.
Policy LU-280. Use a hierarchy of conceptual plan, master plan and site plan review and
approval to encourage the cohesive development of large land areas within the Urban
Center-North. Incorporate integrated design regulations into this review process.
Policy LU-281. Address the mix and compatibility of uses,residential density,
conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs,
circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing through master plan and site plan review
process.
Policy LU-282. Fully integrate signage,building height,bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and
parking considerations in structures and site plans across the various components of each
proposed development.
Policy LU-283. Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans.
Policy LU-284. Allow phasing plans for mixed-use proj ects.
Policy LU-285. Consider placement of structures and parking areas in initial
redevelopment plans to facilitate later infill development at higher densities and
intensities over time.
Policy LU-286. Support structured parking to facilitate full redevelopment of the Urban
Center over the 30-year planning horizon. Where structured parking is infeasible for
early phases of development,parking should be located in the rear or the side of the
primary structure.
Policy LU-287. Discourage parking lots between structures and street right-of-way.
Policy LU-288. Orient buildings to streets to emphasize urban character, maximize
pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use within the District.
Policy LU-289. Use design regulations to provide direction on site design,building
design, landscape treatments, and parking and circulation.
Policy LU-290. Support a combination of internal and external site design features such
as:
1) Plazas;
2) Prominent architectural features;
3) Significant natural features;
4) Distinctive focal features; and
5) Gateways.
Policies for surrounding residential area (north Renton neighborhood south of N 6tn
St)
IX-45
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-291. Provide a transition in land use with respect to intensity of development
where areas mapped Residential Single Family and Residential Options border Urban
Center-North designations.
Policy LU-292. Create boulevard standards for arterial streets connecting or running
through adjacent residential neighborhoods that address noise,pedestrian sidewalks,
planting areas between vehicular lanes and pedestrian areas,traffic calming techniques,
lighting standards, a landscape planting plan for street trees and other vegetation, and
street furniture.
Policy LU-293. Support a mix of activities within the Urban Center-North designation
that support populations in adjacent residential areas as well as new development within
the re-development area. Examples of uses that serve the needs of existing populations
include neighborhood-scale retail that addresses the day-to-day needs of residents,
restaurants and coffee houses,public facilities, and places of assembly such as parks and
plazas.
Policies for Public Facilities
Policy LU-294. Evaluate public facility needs for projected new populations within the
Urban Center—North to accommodate a wide range of future users.
Policy LU-295. Support a partnership with community stakeholders such as the Renton
School District o provide a transition for public properties adjacent to the Urban Center—
North such as the Sartori School and Renton Stadium facilities. Transition of these
facilities could range from accommodating a new clientele as the area transitions to
mixed use activities, or physical re-development of properties addressing the needs of
employees or residents of the Urban Center.
Policy LU-296. Recognize the Renton Municipal Airport as an essential public facility.
(See Section on Airport Compatibility Policies).
Urban Center North Districts
The proposed Urban Center-North is divided into two districts for planning purposes.
Each District has a different emphasis in terms of range, intensity and mix of uses. These
are District One, east of Logan Avenue, and District Two,west of Logan Avenue. The
implementation of planning concepts for District Two will be dependent on decisions by
The Boeing Company regarding continued airplane assembly operations at the Renton
Plant. For this reason, initiation of redevelopment in District Two will likely occur after
transition of the area east of Logan Avenue, District One,has begun.
Consolidation of Boeing operations may cause certain property located within District
One to be deemed surplus, making it available for redevelopment within the near future.
District One is envisioned to include a variety of uses. The intensity of these uses would
require substantial infrastructure improvements. More extensive development, ultimately
anticipated with the future development of District Two,will likely require even more
significant infrastructure upgrades.
Redevelopment in both districts of the Urban Center-North will be responsive and
protective of the North Renton residential neighborhood to the south. While the North
IX-46
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Renton neighborhood is not a part of the Urban Center, its residents will benefit from the
significant amenities provided by development of a new urban community.
Redevelopment within both districts will occur in a manner that is not incompatible with
the operations at the Renton Municipal Airport, recognizing that the airport is an essential
public facility located within an urban area. Redevelopment within both districts will be
consistent with the City's Airport Compatible Land Use Program. The program responds
to State requirements to consider how land use in the surrounding areas affects the
Renton airport.
The current supply of underutilized land north of N. 8th Street creates an immediate
redevelopment opportunity for a first phase of development in District One. However,
the industrial character of the surrounding developed properties, both within District Two
to the west and the Employment Area-Industrial area to the east, will make it difficult to
achieve true urban intensities in District One at the beginning of this transition. The
overall Vision for the District contemplates much more than a series of low-rise
structures with large parking lots. Therefore, it is important that this initial development
facilitates later stages of investment as the neighborhood matures and property values
increase. It is also critical that the early-stage vision for District One sets the stage for
high-quality redevelopment in District Two.
The following"visions"have been developed for each District.
Vision -District One
The changes in District One will be dramatic, as surface parking lots and existing large-
scale industrial buildings are replaced by retail, flex tech, and office uses. Initial
development may be characterized by large-format, low-rise buildings surrounding
internal surface parking lots and bordered by a strong pedestrian-oriented spine along
Park Avenue. As the Urban Center-North evolves, the buildings of District One may be
remodeled and/or replaced with taller, higher density structures. Parking structures may
also be built in future phases as infill projects that further the urbanization of the District.
Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a
destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed-use,
urban scale office and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. It is hoped
that over time these patterns will blend to become a cohesive mixed-use district.
In its first phases of development, District One hosts for the region a new form of retail
center. Absent are the physical constraints of a covered mall. Although parking initially
may be handled in surface lots, their configuration,juxtaposed with smaller building
units, eliminates the expanse of paving that makes other retail shopping areas
unappealing to pedestrians. Building facades, of one or two stories, are positioned
adjacent to sidewalks and landscaped promenades. Destination retail uses that draw from
a sub-regional or regional market blend with small, specialty stores in an integrated
shopping environment to support other businesses in the area. While large-format("big-
box")retail stores anchor development, they do not stand-alone. Rather, they are
architecturally and functionally connected to the smaller shops and stores in integrated
shopping centers. Cafes with outdoor seating, tree-lined boulevards and small gathering
places invite shoppers to linger after making their initial purchases. Retail development
IX-47
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
takes an urban form with high-quality design considering a human scale and pedestrian
orientation.
While retail development will add to the City's tax base and create a modest increase in
employment, the vision for the Urban Center-North is that of a dense employment center.
Within the initial phases of redevelopment,job growth will also occur in high-quality,
well-designed flex/tech development and low-to mid-rise office, lab and research and
development buildings that provide attractive environments for companies offering high-
wage careers in information technology, life sciences and light(clean)manufacturing and
assembly industries.
Redevelopment in this area will also include residential opportunities in low-to mid-rise
buildings with upper-story office and/or ground-related retail. Additional supporting
retail will also be constructed. Logan Avenue is extended and redeveloped for public use
as a major, tree-lined parkway.
During the second generation of redevelopment in District One, changing property values
and further inveshnent will allow for higher density development in the form of offices
and residences mixed with other uses. As this area is transformed into a mature mixed-
use district, community gathering spaces and recreation facilities to support the City's
neighborhoods and business districts become viable. Cultural facilities, as well as
convention and conference centers may be located within the District and could be
incorporated into mixed-use development with retail, office and hotels. Small parks, open
space, and community gathering places will be incorporated into site design. Facilities
such as multiple-screen theaters and other cultural facilities may add to the amenity value
of the District.
District One Policies
Objective LU-YY: Create a major commerciaUretail district developed with uses that
add significantly to Renton's retail tax base,provide additional employment opportunities
within the City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering
place within the community.
Policy LU-297. Support office and technology-based uses with retail uses and services
along portions of the ground floors to facilitate the creation of an urban and pedestrian
environment.
Policy LU-298. Support uses supporting high-technology industries such as
biotechnology, life sciences, and information technology by providing retail amenities
and services in the area.
Policy LU-299. Allow for the development of destination retail centers that are
consistent with a district-wide conceptual plan.
Policy LU-300. Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian-
oriented streets to create urban configurations,
Policy LU-301. Ensure that big-box retail function's as an anchor to larger, cohesive,
urban-scale retail developments.
IX-48
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-302. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an
urban environment.
Objective LU-ZZ: Create an urban district initially characterized by high-quality,
compact, low-rise development that can accommodate a range of independent retail,
office,research, or professional companies. Support the continuing investment in and
transition of low-rise development into more intensive, urban forms of development to
support a vital mixed-use district over time.
Policy LU-303. Encourage pedestrian-oriented development through master planning,
building location, and design guidelines.
Policy LU-304. Support urban forms of setback and buffering treatment such as:
a) Street trees with sidewalk grates,
b) Paving and sidewalk extensions or plazas, and
c) Planters and street furniture.
Policy LU-305. Allow phasing plans for developments as part of the master plan and site
plan review that:
a) Provide a strategy for future infill or redevelopment with mixed-use buildings.
b) Preserve opportunities for future structured parking and more intense
employment-generating development.
Policy LU-306. Support parking at-grade in surface parking lots only when structured or
under-building parking is not market viable.
Policy LU-307. Support development of parking st:ructures using private/public
partnerships when market will not support structural parking without subsidy.
Policy LU-308. Support surface parking lots behind buildings, and in the center of
blocks, screened from the street by structures with landscape buffers.
Policy LU-309. Consider public/private participation in provision of structured parking,
to stimulate additional private investment and produce a more urban environment.
Policy LU-310. Support shared parking by averaging parking ratios for co-located and
mixed-uses.
Policy LU-311. Reduce the suburban character of development,preserve opportunities
for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking
standards.
Policy LU-312. Support the co-location of uses within a site and/or building in order to
promote urban style mixed-use(commerciaUretaiUoffice/residential) development.
Policy LU-313. Discourage ancillary retail pads.
IX-49
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Vision-District Two
' Ongoing Boeing airplane manufacturing is supported to continue across District Two for
the foreseeable future. This important industrial base will continue to provide high-wage
jobs within the Urban Center–North as redevelopment occurs in District One.
Should Boeing surplus property west of Logan Avenue, redevelopment that follows will
take on more urban characteristics, incorporating mixed-use (residential, office, and
retail)development types. Planning for the redevelopment of District Two will take into
consideration the unique issues involved in the transition of a site historically used for
heavy industry adjacent to the Renton Municipal Airport. Redevelopment will be
consistent with the City's Urban Center-North Airport Compatible Land Use Program.
Eventually, redevelopment will lead to the creation of a vibrant new lakefront community
providing additional housing, shopping, and employment opportunities to the region. The
South Lake Washington neighborhood will be a center of activity in the Puget Sound
region—a premiere address for residents, a hub of economic activity providing capacity
for high-wage jobs and a world-class destination for shopping, dining,recreation, and
entertainment
Mixed-use projects will be high in design and construction quality, and offer landmark
living, shopping, and working environments planned to take advantage of a regionally
centralized location, efficient access, mass transit,potential passenger ferry connections,
stellar views of lake and mountains, and restored natural environments along the Cedar
River and Lake Washington shorelines.
Development within District Two will be organized into neighborhoods with housing,
shopping, employment, and recreation opportunities located within walking distance.
Low-to mid-rise buildings will be located to the south while development to the north
will be primarily mid-to- high-rise in order to maximize views. While some on-street or
surface parking may occur, the majority of parking will be provided in the lower levels of
mixed-use buildings or in stand-alone structures designed to blend in with the
surrounding neighborhood.
This environment attracts a residential population living in up-scale neighborhoods
featuring higher-density condominium and apartment forms of housing north of N. 8th St.
Townhouse developments south of N. 8th St. provide a transition to the adj acent North
Renton neighborhood in terms of scale and use of buildings. Residents of both
neighborhoods will find ample shopping and employment opportunities in the immediate
vicinity.
Residents, employees and visitors will enjoy new public open space. These range from
public access to the lakefront through small parks, overviews, and trails, to large public
plazas and central greens that provide gathering places, recreational opportunities, and a
celebration of views of the Seattle skyline, the Olympic Mountains, and Mount Rainier
District Two Policies
Objective LU-AAA: Support ongoing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses.
tx-so
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-314. Support existing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses while
allowing for the gradual transition to other uses should The Boeing Company surplus
property within District Two.
Policy LU-315. Allow airplane manufacturing and related accessory uses such as
airplane sales and repair, laboratories for research, development and testing, medical
institutions, and light industrial uses including small scale or less intensive production
and manufacturing, and fabricating with accessory office and support services.
Objective LU-BBB: If Boeing elects to surplus property in District Two, land uses will
transition into an urban area characterized by high-quality development offering
landmark living, shopping and work environments planned to take advantage of access
and views to the adjacent river and shoreline.
Policy LU-316. Should The Boeing Company elect to surplus properties in District Two
support the redevelopment with a range and variety of commercial, office, research, and
residential uses.
1) Support a mid-to high-rise scale and intensity of development.
2) Support retail and service activities as ancillary uses that are synergistic with
commercial, office,biotech, research, technology, and residential activities.
Traditional retail (Main Street), general business and professional services, and
general offices are examples of the types of uses that are supported in combination
with other activities.
3) Support urban scale residential development in District Two. North of N. 8th Street
structured parking should be required.
4) Allow a limited range of service uses, such as churches, government offices and
facilities, commercial parking garages, and day care centers through the conditional
use process.
5) Allow eating and drinking establishments and cultural facilities as part of office or
mixed-use development.
6) Prohibit new warehousing, storage including self-storage, vehicle sales,repair and
display(including boats, cars, trucks and motorcycles), assembly and packaging
operations, heavy and medium manufacturing and fabrication unrelated to production
of new commercial airplanes.
7) Support development of public amenities such as public open space, schools,
recreational and cultural facilities, and museums.
8) Allow commercial uses such as retail and services provided that they support the
primary uses of the site and are architecturally and functionally integrated into the
development.
CENTER VILLAGE LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: Center Village is characterized by areas of the City that provide an
opportunity for redevelopment as close-in urban mixed-use residential and commercial
areas that are pedestrian oriented. These areas are anticipated to provide medium to high-
density residential development and a wide range of commercial activities serving
citywide and sub-regional markets. Center Villages typically are developed within an
ix-s i
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev.11-Ol-04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
existing suburban land use pattern where opportunities exist to modify the development
pattern to accommodate more growth within the existing urban areas by providing for
compact urban development, transit orientation,pedestrian circulation, and a community
focal point organized around an urban village concept.
Objective LU-CCC: Develop Center Villages, characterized by intense urban
development supported by site planning and infrastructure that provides a pedestrian
scale environment.
Policy LU-317. Apply the Center Village Designation to areas with an existing suburban
and auto-oriented land use pattern,which, due to availability and proximity to existing
residential neighborhoods, are candidate locations for a higher density mixed-use type of
development.
Policy LU-318. Implement the Center Village Designation using multiple zoning
designations including Residential 10 (R-10), Center Village(CV), and Residential
Multi-family(RMF).
Strategy 319.1. Evaluate commercial and residential development standards in the
Center Village and replace zoning designations or re-zone with the vision for a Center
Village designation
Strategy 319.2. Prepare a Highlands Plan as a sub-area plan to further refine the land use
concept for and implement the Center Village land use concepts. Phasing of the
Highlands Redevelopment Plan is expected to occur over a 2—5- year period.
Strategy 319.3. Areas east of Edmonds and north of Sunset currently zoned RMF are to
remain in residential use. The area north of 12th St. currently zoned R-10 is to remain in
residential use.
Policy LU-320. Allow residential density ranging from 10 to 80 dwelling units per acre
in the Center Village Designation.
Policy LU-321. Encourage mixed-use structures and projects.
Policy LU-322. Orient site and building design primarily toward pedestrians and people
to maacimize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use for circulation within the
Center
Policy LU-323. Accommodate parking within a parking structure. Where structured
parking is infeasible,parking should be located in the back or the side of the primary
structure. Discourage parking lots between structures and street rights-of-way.
Policy LU-324. Use alley access where alleys currently exist. Encourage designation of
new alleys in redevelopment projects.
Policy LU-325. Encourage shared parking to use urban land efficiency.
Policy LU-326. Develop design guidelines to provide direction on site design,building
design, landscape treatments, and parking and circulation components of new
development projects. Implementation of this policy should be phased within three years
of the adoption of the 2004 Update.
IX-52
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-327. Encourage uses in Center Villages that serve a sub-regional or citywide
market as well as the surrounding neighborhoods.
Policy LU-328. Encourage more urban style design and intensity of development (e.g.
building height, bulk, landscaping, parking) within Center Villages than with land uses
outside the Center.
Policy LU-329. Promote the clustering of community commercial uses and discourage
the development of strip commercial areas.
Policy LU-330. Residential development within Center Villages is intended to be urban
scale, stacked, flat and/or townhouse development with structured parking.
Policy LU-331. Prohibit new garden style multi-family development.
Policy LU-332. Provide community scale office and service uses.
IX-53
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
X. COMMERCIAL
Goal: Support existing businesses and provide an energetic business environment for
new commercial activity providing a range of service, office, commercial, and mixed use
residential uses that enhance the City's employment and tax base along arterial
boulevards and in designated development areas.
Discussion: There are three commercial designations:
1) Commercial Corridar;
2) CommerciaUOffice/Residential; and
3) Commercial Neighborhood.
These commercial areas range from intense retail corridors to major office parks to
neighborhood scale commercial. Many commercial areas are located along arterials
where the high volumes of daily traffic provide a substantial customer base.
COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The Commercial Corridor district is characterized by concentrated,
pre-existing commercial activity,primarily in a linear urban form, that provides
necessary goods and services for daily living, accessible to near-by neighborhoods,
serving a sub-regional market and accommodating large volumes of traffic.
It is the intention of City objectives and policies that Cominercial Corridor areas evolve
from"strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by
enhanced site planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access,
amenities, and boulevard treatment. Commercial Corridor areas may include designated
districts including concentrations of specialized uses such as the Auto Mall, or features
such as transit stops and a combination of businesses creating a focal point of pedestrian
activity and visual interest.
Commercial Corridor areas are characterized by medium intensity levels of activity. It is
anticipated,however, that intensity levels in these areas will increase over time as
development of vacant space occurs, increased land value makes redevelopment feasible,
and land is used more efficiently. In these districts,provision of pedestrian amenities is
encouraged, as are opportunities to link adjacent uses and neighborhoods.
Objective LU-DDD: The Commercial Corridor land use designation should include:
1) Established commercial and office areas;
2) Developments located on large parcels of land;
3) Projects that may be highly visible from principal arterials;
4) Uses dependent upon or benefiting from high-volume traffic;
IX-54
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
5) Uses that provide significant employment; and
6) Businesses that provide necessary or desirable goods and services to the larger
community.
Policy LU-333. The Commercial Corridor Land Use designation should be mapped in
areas with the following characteristics:
1) Located on, and having access to, streets classified as principle arterials;
2) High traffic volumes; or
3) Land use pattern characterized by strip commercial development, shopping centers, or
office parks.
Policy LU-334. The Commercial Corridor designation should be implemented through
Commercial Arterial, Commercial Office, or Light Industrial zoning.
Policy LU-335. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated
primarily through redevelopment and intensification of existing business area
designations rather than expansion of those areas.
Objective LU-EEE: Create opportunities for development and re-development of land
in portions of the Commercial Corridor designation for general business and service uses.
These include a wide range of restaurant, small-scale to big-box retail, offices, auto
dealers, light industrial, and residential uses.
Policy LU-336. Portions of the Commercial Corridor designation appropriate for a wide
range of uses catering to low and medium intensity office, service, and retail uses should
be mapped with Commercial Arterial zoning.
Policy LU-337. Areas that should be considered for Commercial Arterial zoning should
meet the following criteria:
1) The corridor is served by transit or has transit within one-quarter mile;
2) A historical strip commercial urban development pattern predominates;
3) Large, surface parking lots exist;
4) Primary development on the site is located at rear portions of the property with
parking in front of the buildings;
5) Parcel size and configuration typically is defined by a larger parcel fronting the
arterial street with multiple buildings and businesses; and
6) The corridor exhibits long block lengths and/or an incomplete grid street network.
Policy LU-338. Commercial Arterial zoned areas should include an opportunity for
residential uses and office as part of mixed-use development.
Objective LU-FFF: Create opportunities for inten.�ive office uses in portions of
Commercial Corridor designations including a wide range of business, financial, and
professional services supported by service and commercial/retail activities.
ix-ss
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-339. Areas of the City identified for intensive office use may be mapped with
Commercial Office implementing zoning when site is developed,historically used for
office, or the site meets the following criteria:
1) Site is located contiguous to an existing or planned transit route;
2) Large parcel size;
3) High visibility; and
4) Opportunities for views.
Policy LU-340. Small-scale medical uses associated with major institutions should be
located in the portions of Commercial Corridor designated areas with Commercial Office
zoning, in the Urban Center, or in the Employment Area—Valley.
Policy LU-341. Retirement centers that have a medical facility as a component of the
services offered should be located in areas of the Commercial Corridor that have
Commercial Office zoning.
Policy LU-342. Medium and high intensity office should be encouraged as the primary
use in Commercial Office zoned areas.
Policy LU-343. Retail and services should support the primary office use in areas
identified for Commercial Office zoning, and should be located on the ground floor of
office and parking structures.
Policy LU-344. In the Commercial Office zone, high-rise office development should be
limited to ten(10) stories. Fifteen (15) stories may be obtained through a height bonus
system.
Policy LU-345. Height bonuses of five(5) stories may be allowed for office buildings in
designated areas of the Commercial Office zone, under appropriate conditions,where
sites provide additional public benefits such as plazas,parks, exceptional landscaping,
and/or public art.
Objective LU-GGG: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Corridor
designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban
forms into more concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the
existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site
planning.
Policy LU-346. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located
along principal arterials in the City.
Policy LU-347. Implement development standards that encourage lively, attractive,
medium to high-density commercial areas.
Policy LU-348. Encourage consolidation of individual parcels to maximize flexibility of �
site design and reduce access points.
IX-56
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-349. Support development plans incorporating the following features:
1) Shared access points and fewer curb cuts;
2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels;
3) Shared parking facilities;
4) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities;
5) Centralized signage;
6) Unified development concepts; and
7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts.
Policy LU-350. New development in Commercial Corridor designated areas should be
encouraged to implement uniform site standards, including:
1) Minimum lot depth of 200 feet;
2) Maximum height of ten(10) stories within office zoned designations;
3) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice;
4) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer;
5) Front setback without frontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk; and
6) Common signage and lighting system.
Policy LU-351. Identify and map activity nodes located along principal arterials that are
the foundation of the Corridors, and guide the development or redevelopment of these
nodes as activity areas for the larger corridors so that they enhance their function.
Policy LU-352. Development within defined activity nodes should be subject to
additional design guidelines as delineated in the development standards.
Policy LU-353. Structures at Commercial Corridor intersections should not be set back
from the street and sidewalk so as to allow vehicular circulation or parking to be located
between the sidewalk and the building.
Policy LU-354. Commercial Corridor intersections frequented by pedestrians, due to the
nature of nearby uses or transit stops, should feature sidewalk pavement increased to
form pedestrian corners and include pedestrian amenities, signage, and special design
treatment that would make them identifiable as activity areas for the larger corridor.
Policy LU-355. Parking at designated intersections should be in back of structures and
not located between structures and the sidewalk or street.
Policy LU-356. Structures in Commercial Corridor areas that front sidewalks abutting
the principal arterial or are located at activity nodes should be eligible for a height bonus
and therefore may exceed the maximum allowable height in the district.
Policy LU-357. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be
encouraged as part of new development or redevelopment.
Policy LU-358. Parking areas should be landscaped(including street trees,buffers,
berms), especially along roadways,to reduce visual impacts.
Objective LU-HHH: Support methods of increasing accessibility to Commercial
Corridor areas for both automobile and transit to support the land use objectives of the
district.
ix-s�
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-359. Support routing of the citywide transit system to Commercial Corridor
areas to provide greater access.
Policy LU-360. Encourage development proponents to work with the City
Transportation Division,King County METRO, and Sound Transit in order to site transit
stops within the Commercial Corridor areas.
Policy LU-361. Public transportation transit stops located in Commercial Corridor areas
should be safe, clean, comfortable, and attractive.
Objective LU-III: Ensure quality development in Commercial Office zones.
Policy LU-362. Office sites and structures should be designed(e.g. signage; building
height,bulk and setback; landscaping; parking) to mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent
land uses.
Policy LU-363. Parking provided on-site, in parking structures, and either buffered from
adjacent uses or incorporated into pedestrian-oriented street design, is preferred.
Policy LU-364. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, circulation within the
site should be primarily pedestrian-oriented.
Policy LU-365. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, vehicular access to
the site should be from the primary street with the access points minimized and designed
to ease entrance and exit.
Policy LU-366. Public amenity features (e.g. parks,plazas, recreation areas), should be
encouraged(i.e. through incentives or similar means) as part of every high-intensity
office development.
Policy LU-367. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, site and building
design should be transit-,people-, and pedestrian-oriented. Ground floor uses and design
should be pedestrian-oriented.
Objective LU-JJJ: Where Commercial Corridor areas intersect other land use
designations, recognition of a transition and/or buffer between uses should be
incorporated into redevelopment plans.
Policy LU-368. Consideration of the scale and building style of near-by residential
neighborhoods should be included in development proposals.
Policy LU-369. Development should be designed to consider potential adverse impacts
on adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting, landscaping, and setbacks should all be
considered during site design.
Policy LU-370. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and screening
devices such as berms and fencing should be employed to reduce impacts (e.g. visual,
noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses.
IX-58
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Renton Auto Mall
Discussion: The Renton Auto Mall is intended to serve several purposes on behalf of the
City and business community. It increases vehicle sales and corresponding tax revenue
returned to the City. It has special development standards that are predictable, cohesive,
and uniform throughout the District.
It is easily accessible from regional interstate transportation systems, and improves and
increases values of underdeveloped property. The Auto Mall, by providing a District for
this concentrated activity, allows land that might otherwise be used for vehicle sales and
service to be reutilized more efficiently in other Districts, such as the Urban Center.
Additional benefits may accrue to both City residents and people on a regional basis due
to the opportunity to comparison shop and conveniently participate in activities related to
auto sales and service.
Objective LU-KKK: Provide support for a cohesive Commercial Corridor District
specifically for the concentration of auto- and vehicular-related businesses in order to
increase their revenue and the sales tax base for the City.
Policy LU-371. The Renton Auto Mall should be primarily located along SW Grady
Way,between Oakesdale Ave. S.W. and Williams Ave. S.,but may be expanded beyond
this area as warranted.
Policy LU-372. The objectives and policies of the Commercial Corridor designation
should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning within Auto Mall District A
and by the underlying zoning in Auto Mall District B.
Objective LU-LLL: In order to further the continued cohesiveness of the Auto Mall
Improvement District, a right-of-way improvement plan should be completed, adopted,
and implemented by the City in coordination with property owners and auto dealers.
Policy LU-373. The coordinated right-of-way improvement plan should address area
gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, and shared access.
Policy LU-374. A designated gateway to the Auto Mall District should be made visually
distinctive through the use of gateway features.
Policy LU-375. In order to facilitate the consolidation of land into a cohesive district,
fees and other compensation normally levied for street right-of-way vacation should be
waived.
Objective LU-MMM: Auto Mall Improvement District development standards, site
planning, and project review should further the goal of the City to present an attractive
environment for doing regional-scale, auto-related business.
Policy LU-376. Landscaping along principal arterials should be uniform from parcel to
parcel in order to further the visual cohesiveness of the District.
IX-59
C1TY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-377. On-site landscaping should consist of a minimum two and one half
percent(2.5%) of the gross site area.
Policy LU-378. On-site landscaping should primarily be located at site entries, in front
of buildings, and at other locations with high visibility from public areas.
Policy LU-379. Vehicle service areas should not be readily visible from public rights-of-
way.
Objective LU-NNN: Use of the Auto Mall District by pedestrians should be encouraged
by improving safety and creating an attractive, "walkable"business environment.
Policy LU-380. Designated walkways should be part of a larger network of pedestrian
connections between businesses throughout the district.
Policy LU-381. To enhance use of the Auto Mall Improvement District by pedestrians
the following features should be used:
� Wheel stops or curbs placed to prevent overhang of sidewalks by vehicle
bumpers.
• Customer parking located and clearly marked near site entries.
� Coordinated dealer-to-dealer signage should be developed.
NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor
Discussion: The NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor is unique in the City due to the highly
eclectic mix of commercial and residential uses along its length. These integrated uses,
located at a `gateway"to the City, are an appropriate signal to those enteringRenton
that the community is diverse in many ways. Height limitations in the Development
Standards have kept buildings along the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor at two stories or
below, a scale that is generally consistent with the various forms of residential along the
corridor.
Objective LU-000: A special district should be designated along NE Sunset
Boulevard. The purpose of this area would be to make the commercial environment
more attractive to local and sub-regional shoppers so that local businesses will be more
economically viable and the City's tax base will increase. Implementing code will be put
in place within three years of the adoption date for the GMA update.
Policy LU-382. Within the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, a"Business District" should
include the commercial properties along NE Sunset Blvd. from Duvall Ave. N.E. to west
of Union Ave. N.E.
Policy LU-383. The NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, due to its location on the east
boundary of the City, should include City gateway features.
Policy LU-384. The NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, due to its location abutting
Highlands Neighborhood Center, should be considered a gateway to that district and
feature design elements that are coordinated with, and reflect the nature of the Highlands
Neighborhood Center.
IX-60
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-385. The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the NE Sunset
Boulevard Corridor should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning.
Policy LU-386. Vehicle sales businesses existing in the NE Sunset Boulevard Business
Corridor should be encouraged to relocate to the Renton Auto Mall District.
Northeast Fourth Corridor
Discussion: The Northeast Fourth Corridor is an active commercial area located at a
gateway to the City. It features a wide variety of retail and service uses and several
different structural forms from small professional offices to large-scale strip malls with
major grocery anchors.
Annexations of land into the City to the east of this commercial area and subsequent
development of large single family housing projects has increased the market area for the
Northeast Fourth Corridor considerably in recent years.
Objective LU-PPP: A special commercial area should be designated along Northeast
Fourth Street. The purpose of this area would be to enhance the commercial environment
to increase revenue of local businesses and the City's tax base.
Policy LU-387. Within the Northeast Fourth Corridor, the"Business DistricY' should be
bounded by Queen Avenue NE(on the west) and Field Ave N.E. (on the east).
Policy LU-388. The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the Northeast
Fourth Corridor Business District should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning.
Objective LU-QQQ: The Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should be
enhanced to improve efficiency, safety and attractiveness to both potential shoppers and
pass-through traffic.
Policy LU-389. Due to its location at a key entrance to the City from the east, the
Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should include gateway features.
Policy LU-390. The Northeast Fourth Business District should be enhanced with
boulevard design features such as landscaped center of road medians for the purpose of
improving safety through traffic control and slowing traffic for pedestrian safety and
improved conditions for vehicles leaving and entering the principal arterial.
Policy LU-391. To the extent possible, undeveloped parcels and pads and/or
redevelopment in the Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should feature street-
facing building facades located a maximum of fifteen(15) feet set back from the non-
curb edge of sidewalks abutting the principal arterial.
Policy LU-392. In the Northeast Fourth Business Corridor Business District,where
buildings are set back more than fifteen(15) feet from the principal arterial, new
development or redevelopment should:
IX-61
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
l. Contribute a furnished public gathering space, abutting the sidewalk along the
principal arterial, of no less than 1,000 square feet with a minimum dimension of
twenty(20) feet on one side. Such space should have landscaping, including street
trees, decorative paving, pedestrian-scaled lighting and seating, at a minimum.
2. Designate appropriate site(s) for future pad development for additional commercial
structures located to conform to maximum setback requirements.
Rainier Avenue Corridor
Discussion: The Rainier Avenue Corridor is one of the most commercially viable areas
of the City. Redevelopment of infrastructure and businesses in the Rainier Corridor
would present the opportunity to strengthen the transition between the Corridor, a major
transportation route through the west part of the City, and the Urban Center. Changes of
this nature could increase the economic vitality ofRenton's Downtown.
Objective LU-RRR: A special commercial area should be designated along Rainier
Avenue. The purpose of this area would be to enhance the commercial environment to
increase revenue of local businesses and the City's tax base.
Policy LU-393. Within the Rainier Avenue Corridor,the"Business District" should be
bounded by properties directly north of S. 2°a Street on the north and the Houser railroad
trestle on the south where it abuts the Auto Mall District.
Policy LU-394. The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the Rainier
Avenue Corridor Business District should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning.
Policy LU-395. Uses in the Rainier Avenue Corridor should be primarily retail-oriented,
and may have an emphasis on providing goods on a high-volume,vehicle-accessed basis,
but should also provide high-quality and specialty goods.
Objective LU-SSS: Due to the nature of the retail core business in the Rainier Avenue
Corridor, vehicular access and egress safety should be a primary consideration.
Policy LU-396. In the Rainier Avenue Corridor access points to businesses fronting the
principal arterial should be consolidated if at all possible and curb cuts reduced wherever
feasible.
Policy LU-397. Business signs in the Rainier Avenue Business Corridor should be
uniform in size, content, and location to reduce visual clutter. Monument signs are the
preferred type.
Policy LU-398. New billboard signs should be disallowed in the Rainier Avenue
Corridor Business District due to the large scale of the signs in relation to the scale of the
district. Existing signs should be well-maintained so that visual impact is reduced.
Objective LU-TTT: The Rainier Avenue Corridor Business District should be enhanced
to improve efficiency, safety and attractiveness to both potential shoppers and pedestrians
using the public transportation system.
IX-62
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-399. In the Rainier Avenue Corridor Business District, due to significant
pedestrian use of the intersections of Rainier Avenue and Sunset Boulevard/South Third
Street, Rainier Avenue and South Third Place, and Rainier Avenue and South Fourth
Street, sidewalk widths at these locations should be increased to create pedestrian corners
whenever redevelopment occurs. Pavement should be increased for added pedestrian
safety.
Policy LU-400. On corners having high-volume pedestrian traffic, the paved sidewalk
area should be increased in size. This may require a larger building setback at the corners
of buildings when building facades abut the sidewalk.
Policy LU-401. Pedestrian corners should include urban street furniture such as a bench
or benches, information kiosk, and trash receptacle.
Policy LU-402. Rainier Avenue should be improved with landscaped median and
additional street trees to improve safety and appearance.
Policy LU-403. Property owners and business owners should be encouraged to provide
awnings or other weather protection on facades of buildings fronting sidewalks.
Objective LU-UUU: The Rainier Avenue Business Corridor District is one of the
busiest arterials in the City and is located as a gateway to the City from both the south
and north. The design, function, and configuration of the District should reflect its status
as a key gateway.
Policy LU-404. The Rainier Avenue Corridor should feature gateway elements to the
extent made possible by redevelopment.
Policy LU-405. Signage in the Rainier Avenue Corridor Business District should include
high quality City directional signs to the Urban Center, City Hall, IKEA Performing Arts
Center, Piazza Park, City parking garage, library, museum, and other prominent public
destinations.
IX-63
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The CommerciaUOffice/Residential (COR) designation provides
opportunities for large-scale office, commercial retail and multi-family projects
developed through a master plan and site plan process incorporation significant site
amenities and/or gateway features. COR sites are typically transitions from an industrial
use to a more intensive land use. The sites offer redevelopment opportunities on Lake
Washington and/or the Cedar River.
Objective LU-VVV: Development at Commercial/Office/Residential designations
should be cohesive,high quality, landmark developments that are integrated with natural
amenities. The intention is to create a compact, urban development with high amenity
values that creates a prominent identity.
Policy LU-406. Designate Commercial/Office/Residential in locations meeting the
following criteria:
1) There is the potential for redevelopment, or a sufficient amount of vacant land to
encourage significant concentration of development;
2) The COR site could function as a gateway to the City;
3) COR sites should be located on major transit and transportation routes; and
4) The COR location has significant amenity value, such as water access, that can
support landmark development.
Policy LU-407. Consistent with the locational criteria, CommerciaUOffice/Residential
designations may be placed on property adjacent to, or abutting, residential, commercial
industrial designations or publicly owned properties. COR designations next to higher
intensity zones such as industrial, or next to public uses, may provide a transition to less
intense designations in the vicinity. Site design of COR should consider the long-term
retention of adjacent or abutting industrial or public uses. �
Policy LU-408. Uses in CommerciaUOffice/Residential designations should include
mixed-use complexes consisting of office, and/or residential uses, cultural facilities,hotel
and convention center type development, technology research and development facilities;
and corporate headquarters.
Policy LU-409. Commercial uses such as retail and services should support the primary
uses of the site and be architecturally and functionally integrated into the development.
Policy LU-410. Commercial development, excluding big-box, may be a primary use in a
CommerciaUOffice/Residential designation, if:
1) It provides significant economic value to the City;
2) It is sited in conjunction with small-scale, multiple businesses in a"business district;"
3) It is designed with the scale and intensity envisioned for the COR; and
4) It is part of a proposed master plan development.
IX-64
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-411. Individual properties may have a single use if they can be developed at
the scale and intensity envisioned for the designation CommerciaUOffice/Residential
project, or if proposed as part of a phased development and multi-parcel proposal that
includes a mix of uses.
Policy LU-412. Structured parking should be required. If lack of financial feasibility
can be demonstrated at the time of the COR development,phased structured parking
should be accommodated in the proposed master plan.
Policy LU-413. Sites that have significant limitations on redevelopment due to
environmental, access, andlor land assembly constraints should be granted flexibility of
use combinations and development standards through the master plan process.
Policy LU-414. Private/public partnerships should be encouraged to provide
infrastructure development, transportation facilities,public uses, and amenities.
Policy LU-415. Adjacent properties within a designated COR should be combined for
master planning purposes and public review regardless of ownership.
Policy LU-416. Master plans should coordinate the mix and compatibility of uses,
residential density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of
gateway features, signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing regardless of
ownership of individual parcels.
Policy LU-417. Maximum residential density at COR designated sites should range
between 30 to 50 dwelling units per acre. The same area used for commercial and office
development may also be used to calculate residential density.
Policy LU-418. CommerciaUOffice/Residential master plans should be guided by design
criteria specific to the location, context, and scale of the designated COR. COR Design
Guidelines should fully integrate signage,building height,bulk, setbacks, landscaping,
and parking considerations for the various components of each proposed project within
the COR development.
Policy LU-419. Internally, CommerciaUOffice/Residential developments should be
primarily pedestrian-oriented. Internal site circulation of vehicles should be separated
from pedestrians wherever feasible by dedicated walkways.
Policy LU-420. Primary vehicular access to COR development should be from principal
arterials. Internal streets should be sized hierarchically. Curb cuts should not conflict
with pedestrian routes, if possible.
Policy LU-421. CommerciaUOffice/Residential developments should have a
combination of internal and external site design features, such as:
IX-65
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-Oi-04
1) Public plazas;
2) Prominent architectural features;
3) Public access to natural features or views;
� 4) Distinctive focal features;
5) Indication of the function as a gateway, if appropriate;
6) Structured parking; and
7) Other features meeting the spirit and intent of the COR designation.
IX-66
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The purpose of Commercial Neighborhood designation is to provide
small scale, low-intensity commercial areas located within neighborhoods primarily for
the convenience of residents who live nearby. Uses should be those that provide goods
and services. In addition, a limited amount of residential opportunities should be
provided.
Objective LU-WWW: Commercial Neighborhood designated areas are intended to
reduce traffic volumes,permit small-scale business uses, such as commerciaUretail,
professional office, and services that serve the personal needs of the immediate
population in surrounding neighborhoods.
Policy LU-422. The Commercial Neighborhood designation should be implemented by
Commercial Neighborhood zoning.
Policy LU-423. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should be located:
1) Within one-quarter mile of existing and planned residential areas;
2) To the extent possible, outside of the trade areas of other small-scale commercial uses
offering comparable goods and services; and
3) Contiguous to a street no smaller than those classified at the collector level.
Policy LU-424. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should not increase in scale
or size to the point of changing the character of the nearby residential neighborhood.
Policy LU-425. The small-scale uses of Commercial Neighborhood designated areas
should not increase in intensity so that the character of the commercial area or that of the
nearby residential area is changed.
Policy LU-426. A mix of uses (e.g. convenience retail, consumer services, offices,
residential) should be encouraged in small-scale commercial developments within
Commercial Neighborhood designated areas.
Policy LU-427. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should consist primarily of
retail andlor service uses.
Policy LU-428. Products and services related to large-scale motorized machinery,
vehicles, or equipment should not be allowed in Commercial Neighborhood designated
areas. Nor should uses that result in emissions, noise, or other potential nuisance
conditions be allowed in such areas.
Policy LU-429. Residential uses should be located above the ground floor, limited to no
more than four units per structure and should be secondary to retail and services uses.
IX-67
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev.11-Ol-04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Policy LU-430. Commercial structures in Commercial Neighborhood designated areas
should be compatible with nearby residential areas in height, frontyard setbacks, lot
coverage,building design, and use.
IX-68
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
XI. EMPLOYMENT AREAS
Goal: Achieve a mix of land uses including industrial, high technology, office, and
commercial activities in Employment Areas that lead to economic growth and a
strengthening of Renton's employment base.
Discussion: These policies are designed to ensure that Renton will have adequate
reserves of land and appropriate use designations to further its economic development
efforts. Adequate land is necessary to attract new businesses in an effort to expand and
diversify, and stabilize the employment base. There are two Employment Area Land Use
Designations:
1) Employment Area—Industrial
2) Employment Area— Valley
Flexibility is encouraged in the Employment Areas by allowing a range of uses and
multiple users on sites. Research and development businesses may need to evolve into
production and distribution facilities as products are developed and receive approval for
marketing. A flexible approach can facilitate business development and stimulate
creation of nodes of employment activity supported by commercial and service uses.
Objective LU-XXX: Encourage economic growth resulting in greater diversity and
stability in the employment and tax bases by providing adequate land capacity through
zoning amounts of land to meet the needs of future employers.
Policy LU-431. The City should endeavor to expand its present economic base,
emphasizing new technologies, research and development facilities, science parks, and
high-technology centers, and supporting commercial and office land uses.
Policy LU-432. In each employment designation, an appropriate mix of commercial,
office, light industrial, and industrial uses should be supported. The mix will vary
depending on the employment area emphasis.
Policy LU-433. Encourage flexibility in use and reuse of existing, conforming structures
to allow business to evolve in response to market and production requirements.
Policy LU-434. Support location of commercial and service uses in proximity to office
or industrial uses to develop nodes of employment supported by services.
Objective LU-YYY: Promote the development of low impact, light industrial uses,
particularly those within the high-technology category, in Employment Area-Valley and
Employment Area-Industrial designations where potentially adverse impacts can be
mitigated.
IX-69
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-435. Site planning review should ensl�re that light industrial uses are neither
intrusive nor adversely affected by other uses nearby.
EMPLOYMENT AREA-INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The Employment Area-Industrial designation is intended to provide
continued opportunity for manufacturing and industrial uses that create a strong
employment base in the City.
Discussion: Although location is an important factor for all types of development, it is
especially critical for industrial development. Industries need good access in areas with
low traffic volumes. As the City becomes more urban, they need assurance that
incompatible uses will not be allowed that could eventually force them to relocate. Other
uses, especially residential, also want to ensure that industries do not impact their
neighborhoods with noise, traff c, and other nuisances and hazards. For these reasons,
although commercial areas may see more diversity and mixing of uses, industrial areas
will remain somewhat isolated from other uses.
Objective LU-ZZZ: Sustain industrial areas that function as integrated employment
activity areas and include a core of industrial uses and other related businesses and
services, transit facilities, and amenities.
Policy LU-436. The primary use in the Employment Area- Industrial designation should
be industrial.
Policy LU-437. A mix of offices, light industrial, warehousing, and manufacturing
should be encouraged in the Employment Area-Industrial classification, with conditions
as appropriate.
Policy LU-438. Industrial uses with a synergistic relationship should be encouraged to
locate in close proximity to one another.
Policy LU-439. Industrial parks that provide space for several related or unrelated,but
compatible users should be encouraged to:
1) Include more than one industrial use organized into a single development;
2) Share facilities such as parking, transit facilities,recreation facilities, and amenities;
3) Include properties in more than one ownership;
4) Locate in areas with adequate regional access to minimize their impacts on the local
street network; and
5) Organize the site plan to place building fronts to the street with service and parking
screened from the front.
Policy LU-440. Existing industrial activities may create noise, chemicals, odors, or other
potentially noxious off-site impacts. Within the Employment Area-Industrial designation
existing industrial activities should be protected. Although the designation allows a wide
range and mix of uses, new businesses that would be impacted by pre-existing industrial
activities should be discouraged.
IX-70
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-441. When more intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close
proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse
impacts should be the responsibility of the new use.
Policy LU-442. Off-site impacts from industrial development such as noise, odors, light
and glare, surface and ground water pollution, and air quality should be controlled
through setbacks, landscaping, screening and/or fencing, drainage controls,
environmental mitigation, and other techniques.
Policy LU-443. Light industrial uses that result in noise or odors, should be located in
the Employment Area-Industrial designation.
EMPLOYMENT AREA-VALLEY LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Employment Area-Yalley designation is to
allow the gradual transition of the Yalley from traditional industrial and warehousing
uses to more intensive retail service and office activities. The intent is to allow these new
activities without making industrial uses non-conforming and without restricting the
ability of existing businesses to expand.
Objective LU-AAAA: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including
commercial, office, and industrial development to support the economic development of
the City of Renton.
Policy LU-444. Develop the Green River Valley("The Valley") and the Black River
Valley(located between Sunset Blvd and SW Grady Way) areas as places for a range and
variety of commercial, office, and industrial.
Policy LU-445. Non-employment-based uses, such as residential, are prohibited in the
Employment Area Valley.
Policy LU-446. Multi-story office uses should be located in areas most likely to be
served by future multi-modal transportation opportunities. A greater emphasis on public
amenities is appropriate for this type of use.
Policy LU-447. Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site
utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including:
1) Shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities;
2) An improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops;
and
3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch
facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not
exist.
Policy LU-448. Uses such as research, design, and development facilities should be
allowed in office designations and industrial designations when potential adverse impacts
to surrounding uses can be mitigated.
IX-71
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy LU-449. Recognize viable existing and allow new industrial uses in the Valley,
while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to
more intensive commercial and office use.
Objective LU-BBBB: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing a
variety of zoning designations in the Employment Area-Valley designation.
Policy LU-450. Changes from one zone to another should be considered to achieve a
balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic/employment base.
Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land,
and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse land use impacts
should be considered.
Policy LU-451. Commercial Arterial (CA) should be supported only when the proposed
commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 27th
Street or is located north of I-405 and south of l Oth Avenue SW and the area under
consideration is part of a designation totaling over 5 acres (acreage may be in separate
ownerships).
Policy LU-452. Zoning supporting industrial uses should be established when a mix or
wider range of uses is not yet appropriate for a site.
Policy LU-453. Properties lying between SR-167 and East Valley Road from SW 22nd
Street to SW 41st Street should not be granted an industrial zone classification that is
more intensive than Light Industrial in order to avoid the potential for degradation of the
high visibility SR 167 corridor.
Policy LU-454. Commercial Office zoning should be supported where a site has high
visibility,particularly in those portions of the Valley that are gateways and/or along the I-
405 and SR 167 corridors,where larger sites can accommodate more intensive uses, and
where sites can take advantage of existing and/or future multi-modal transportation
opportunities.
Objective LU-CCCC: Ensure quality development in Employment Area-Valley
Policy LU-455. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development
within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of
land uses (Refer to the Community Design Element).
Policy LU-456. Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged.
Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking.
Policy LU-457. Site design for office uses and commercial, and mixed-use
developments should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting,
locating of pedestrian amenities, walkways,parking, etc.
Policy LU-458. Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the
Employment Area-Valley pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development
regulations.
Policy LU-459. New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to
development standards that include scale of building,building fa�ade treatment to reduce
perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping.
ix-�2
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
IX-73
� � " ''�� ♦ ��
�' a�� �I � � � ,� � I� ._� , —
. . � ��. �.�� � � � � ,
� � � �
� ���� �. �j � ��` �
� _ �.� �. �� �
� � .
,� � � �;� ��� ��. �
J �.
�:�'� �� �.*., .
� , . , �• '� �
�� .� �(
� , �
� � �
� , I��
� - � �� . ���
� .,,, �;�� ` i��� ,r�,
1�w� .•.� ' 111 ��_� I► -- - �
�� -,� �
��i�l'I1,`� • --
I���E�``` � � `. +
��������������_ ! � � ,
�����������li�`�.!�� ,�� �� '�� 1� .. �
_
�. .,
�I��@t����ii ����-�� o e�
��� ' � �' '� : .,
�,��.�����i�i� �•�����,�.� �� .�J 4 '��_
� ,:;�.
i� ��� �,,,������ ��,: , � ' �
��t.�: ��1 1=��,��E�► ; _ e�a l� � ��� V � ,_�+ -
is�t�c:�v i� .
�!� �@"a � � • � ' 0
� °�� �� "o����,ll \' ��� �� ��'. ■ e�� � �
—
���� .� �����:�;� ' �,_�,��j ,���b� • �
.� � �� ���a�ir� � om -
��f� '�1�fi' ����i ����El�il�l��� ��d l�Q. �
. ,�� ����� m � � ����� � Y
'���r��V � : _ � , �� � �
�����_� � ���� � �,m� �
� ��Q ��� �,��� � s.�. �: ,,,,_ �_,
� � /p� - � � : ,
����■ ` ', ���■, �� �iLl��:......1� � ��1 � �. � �j
�r . , ����' � ���1�����������_.�/ ■
°j � '" �Rii�—
:�E '��=� Q� � Vul�l�I�I�I�� � .. ��,
���:3.� �n ��,�'i �! �,"�,�i�,� �� •
�„�,� ,, ,, � '°`��1� �!�",� . 11� _ � __� � �, ...o �!.
�
��� ������neu u� .■� ��.�. � �� � I�� _+_ �.
; /!�'�� i�i��n!lS�i l: . �. _ L�� ■ �!I
.
�-'� ..4e�!1�1�� ' ' '� �' ��
�\`��, n�1�1u �� ���. �r a���".� ■
i u��� A. � �L��� �
� � � �' � ����� ' � � � ��
� . ,
..
� � '- ,� �
�./ . ��:� ��e� ° ♦ ,. ��� �►.
� ���■ � � � ��I \
I
;:*—
_ .
� �I
_
,
� ' �� ,
--
- _,�� � •� . ���.:� �' � � '.�...�
�1 �► �, .�
� �
`!, �' �� � � �le �: �, ��'�� �, � ,� .
'� � �. �1� ��r�� � �, ■e �
. - , ����� � ���1� � �
, , . . �������,� � � � �`'� .
.� � � ■
�
/ �p `, � , � y�� ���� �
� � t � � I
. �, �' � �� � . �� �- �► � .
� . , . ,�r� 1 ���
� � � s� ��..� _ �
I � � �� . � "�� .��
.�► � ,�, L
� � � � � �'��: i� ,� �
� � a �� ��
�.�� ,�� . � � � . � _
� � � _-- �� � � � A �
� �,� � ��„ �
'"�'����� ,m��
�� �
�� � ! .-- '�� '� �
..
�
, :�,��-a �.;,s �
�• � �4 . �,,� !�
a��� , 7 ��� � �_
���""'�� ar o
• ' •
� � � � � � � � � , _ � � . .
� �
� � �
� �
� � � � � . , .
.
• , � - .� �� ..�
��� •�
'� .� �
•' � � • • ' •
ORDINANCE NO. 50��
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEARENT
Added 11-01-04 Exhibit `J'
PARKS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS ELEMENT
GOAL
Provide a high quality comprehensive park, recreation, open space, and
trails system to meet the short- and long-term needs of current and future
Renton residents.
x-i
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective P-A: Provide park and recreational facilities throughout the City,
maximizing public access to and involvement in a variety of leisure and cultural
activities.
Policy P-1: The parks system should b.) Undeveloped land in the park
include a variety of park types including system
neighborhood, community, regional, and c.) Park system expansion
linear parks; trails; open space; and
special use areas to meet standards Consider the proximity of lands to
included in the Long Range Parks, population centers, growth trends,
Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan. access, and land suitability.
Policy P-2: Parks, recreation, open Policy P-9: Areas of the Renton city
space and trails facilities should be limits and the PAA that are experiencing
provided based on surveys of user rapid growth, are underserved, or
demand and adopted standards. currently lacking recreational services
sh�uld be prioritized for new investment.
Policy P-3: Develop a variety of active
and passive facilities in a coordinated Policy P-10: Obtain the land necessary
system of neighborhood and community to provide a broad range of recreational
parks. opportunities throughout the community
to meet present and future needs.
Policy P-4: Equitably distribute parks
and recreation by type throughout the Policy P-11: To help satisfy Level of
City. Service (LOS) needs identified in the
Long Range Park, Recreation, Open
Policy P-5: Provide geographically Space and Trails Plan,place a high
dispersed community centers to meet priority of transferring King County
residents' needs for indoor recreation, parklands to the City of Renton upon
athletic instruction, arts, meeting space, an�nexation,when they are contiguous
and special activities. with the City boundary, or when a clear
benefit to the citizens of Renton can be
Policy P-6: Maintain and develop demonstrated. Establish King County's
underdeveloped public rights-of-way for share of costs to bring parks up to
public access and passive recreation acceptable standard.
where appropriate.
Policy P-12: Inform the public and
Policy P-7: Connect parks, promote parks and recreational activities
neighborhoods, schools, open space and by disseminating information from a
activity areas together through a variety of sources including:
coordinated system of trails and open • Marketing brochures
space. • City website
• Electronic readerboard
Policy P-8. Invest in park development • Newsletters
in the following priority order. . Schools
a.) Partially developed parkland ' . Utility billing
x-2
C1TY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
• Renton Riches brochure park lands or facilities must
result in:
Policy P-13: Acquisition of parkland 1. The addition of property
should occur far in advance of its actual of a greater or equal value
need. to the property sold,
2. The sale price must be
Policy P-14: Place high priority upon used for the acquisition of
purchasing as parkland, properties or additional park or
easements for waterfront access. recreation property at fair
market price, or
Policy P-15: Actively seek funding 3. Development of existing
from a variety of sources to help park property.
implement a park acquisition and
development program. Policy P-19: Land on water frontage
should be discouraged from conversion.
Policy P-16: Develop a park
endowment program to enable financial Policy P-20: Encourage Metro to
contributions. provide public transportation to
community and regional park facilities
Policy P-17: Encourage private so that equal opportunity for
donations of properties where public involvement in park programs and
access is anticipated or planned and facilities will be available to residents.
where consistent with the Long Range
Park, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Policy P-21: Develop and operate
Plan. aquatic facilities.
Policy P-18: Conversion of public Palicy P-22: Accessory commercial
parkland to non-recreational use should enterprise operations in parks should be
be discouraged except when the subservient to the parks purpose, provide
following criteria are met: incidental services to park users and
a) Substitution of suitable land or enhance the amenities of the park
facilities elsewhere of greater or environment.
equal value than the property
sold can be accomplished, Policy P-23: Major recreational
b) When proceeds from conversion facilities such as the Maplewood Golf
would satisfy or partially Course may be developed as enterprise
reimburse debt accrued for prior operations providing a self contained
park property or park facility operation, significant specialized
purchases, recreation amenities, retail and service
c) Existing parcel size and components, cost covering user fees, and
considerations are not provide a significant public benefit.
appropriate, or
d) Current location is inappropriate. Policy P-24: Reinvest profits from
e) To ensure there is no net loss in enterprise funded recreational facilities
public recreational benefits to the into the expansion, maintenance, and
City, the disposition of surplus operation of the facility.
X-3
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective P-B: Provide well-designed, constructed, maintained, and operated
parklands and facilities in a manner that is responsive to the site and balances the
needs of the community.
• Environmental quality
Policy P-25: Prior to park development, • Design excellence
budget adequate funding for staffing
needs based on public usage of facilities. Policy P-31: Encourage the use of low
maintenance plant materials that provide
Policy P-26: Prior to park development, year-round color and textural interest.
budget adequate funding for the long-
term maintenance and operation in order Policy P-32: Implement the provisions
to maintain asset safety, function, value and requirements of the Americans with
and aesthetics. Disabilities Act (ADA) and other design
and development standards that will
Policy P-27: Design and construct improve park facility safety and security
indoor and outdoor facility spaces features for department personnel and
including supporting spaces to be the public.
accessible to individuals and
organizations with consideration given P�licy P-33: Develop, budget and
to physical capabilities, skill levels, age implement safety standards, procedures
groups, income levels, and activity an3 programs for department personnel
interests. that provide proper training and
awareness.
Policy P-28: Design and develop large
capacity facilities utilizing high quality, Policy P-34: Define and enforce rules
durable materials that require low and regulations concerning park
maintenance to minimize facility activities and operations that will protect
maintenance and operation costs. department personnel and the public.
The City Attorney should be consulted
Policy P-29: Utilize low maintenance regarding verbiage to be included in
materials and other value engineering rules and regulations and on signage
considerations that reduce care and pertaining to safety.
security requirements, while retaining
natural conditions. Policy P-35: Develop adopt-a-park
programs, neighborhood park watches,
Policy P-30: Construction of new park police patrols, and other innovative
building facilities and retrofitting of programs that will increase safety and
existing buildings should consider the security awareness and visibility.
following elements:
� Sustainable sites Policy P-36: Renovate parks and
• Water efficiency facilities in a manner that will provide
• Energy and atmosphere safety and accessibility to all users,
• Materials and resources conserve the use of energy and other
X-4
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
resources, and maximize efficient
maintenance practices. Policy P-40: Establish a maintenance
management plan to the approved
Policy P-37: Monitor existing parks and maintenance standards.
facilities to ensure that acceptable
standards for safety and performance are Policy P-41: Steward the City's open
met. space network to protect the City's
natural character and sustain its urban
Policy P-38: Establish funding to forest resources.
permit the orderly, on-going repair and
rehabilitation of existing parks and Policy P-42: All parks development
facilities. should be undertaken in a way that
considers the impact of traffic, noise,
Policy P-39: Conserve energy, water litter, glare, light, and hours of operation
and other natural resources, and practice on adjacent areas.
efficient and environmentally
responsible maintenance and operation
procedures.
Objective P-C: Define implementation strategies and the Parks, Recreation, Open
Space, and Trails Policies through development of a long-range functional plan.
Policy P-43: Develop, adopt and • Natural resource element
implement a Long Range Park, . Action plan/Capital facility plan
Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan (Implementation Plan)
to include the following (components): . Inventory of proposed facilities to
• Comprehensive inventory of existing accommodate population growth
facilities within the Renton City • Strategies for funding improvements
limits and the Potential Annexation
Area (PAA) Policy P-44: Periodically update Long
• Recreational Demand Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space
■ Analysis of trends and Trails Plan to maintain compliance
■ List of recreation service with granting agencies.
providers in Renton
■ Random household surveys and Policy P-45: Provide a Long Range
analysis Parks, Recreation, Open Space and
■ Public workshops/meetings Trails Plan that is flexible and can
• Park and facility needs assessment respond to changes in user population or
• LOS (Level of Service) recreational preference.
standards/development criteria—
develop LOS standards and periodic
evaluation
• Recommended service levels
x-s
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Objective P-D: New park and recreational services shall support population growth
concurrently with new development.
Policy P-46. The City of Renton shall b. Dedication of land for parks or open
adopt, implement and maintain an space purposes, including wetlands,
impact mitigation system for new shorelines areas, or sensitive areas
residential development upon the City's only will be considered if such
parks/recreation facilities, open space, dedication satisfies a specific
and trails system. recreational need of the City.
c. The developer can elect to pay a fee
Policy P-47. Impact fees collected by based upon a formula.
King County for development in the d. The developer can propose a
Potential Annexation Area(PAA) should combination of alternatives that is
be set aside for eventual use by the City satisfactory to the City, and satisfies
of Renton to provide parks/recreational a portion of the needs as identified in
facilities serving the area. the Long Range Park, Recreation,
Open Space, and Trails Plan.
Policy P-48. Impact mitigation shall be e. Contributions of land could be
collected to help offset cost of combined through multiple
acquisition, improvement, and developments to meet the minimum
development of the City's park system. standards for facilities as established
by the Long Range Park, Recreation,
Policy P-49: Impact mitigation may Open Space, and Trails Plan.
occur using fees, land dedication, or
facilities based on the following criteria: Policy P-50: Level of Service
a. Developer-constructed public trails, standards, as identified in the adopted
public on-site park and recreational Long Range Comprehensive Park,
facilities, and/or developer- Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan,
constructed public off-site facilities wi11 be used to determine proportional
(in a nearby park) may be considered costs of park system mitigation for new
for mitigation if the facility is built to development.
City parks construction and
maintenance standards.
Objective P-E: Conserve, enhance, and create a variety of open space, wildlife, and
natural resource areas.
Policy P-51: Expand the open space private open spaces and native
netwark as population and employment vegetation easements with public access
densities increase. easements, utility rights-of-way,
waterways, and unusual open spaces
Policy P-52: Multiple uses of public (areas of protected habitat).
open space should be provided.
Interconnect the open space network. Poticy P-53: The function of the open
Include lands such as active and passive space network should:
parks, schools, public open space, trails, • Protect land resources
x-�
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
• Provide relief from urban Policy P-57: Develop inventories and
development (air pollution,heat management plans for open space and
islands, noise, erosion crowding, natural areas.
flooding, etc.)
• Maintain a habitat for wildlife Policy P-58: Provide funds for native
• Provide physical access and vegetation and other habitat
visual connection within the City enhancements to encourage appropriate
• Define the form of the City wildlife on existing open space lands
• Provide for educational where consistent with the recreational
opportunities use of the area.
• Provide a diversity of natural
resources Policy P-59: Acquire open space that
• Protect and encourage threatened has the following features:
and endangered species of plants a. Can fill a gap ar connect the existing
and animals open space network
• Provide public access to creeks, b. Is environmentally sensitive or
rivers, and lakes. unique
c. Provides wildlife habitat
Policy P-54: Where feasible, encourage d. Can protect natural resource areas
public access into public open space e. Is archeologically significant
areas. Public use of open space should f. Provides relief from urban
be provided at a level that is suited to development
protecting the natural resources of the policy P-60: Increase public awareness
area. of, and appreciation for, specific natural
Policy P-55: Where feasible, encourage features through education and
educational opportunities in public open interpretive programs.
space areas. Policy P-61: Incorporate utility, storm
Policy P-56: Structures should be drainage, and other public lands into the
minimized within public open space open space system through cooperative
areas.
use agreements.
Objective P-F: Create a walkable community by developing and maintaining a
comprehensive trails system that provides non-motorized access throughout the
City, maximizes public access to parks, schools, and open space areas, connects to
regional trail systems, and provides increased recreational opportunities for the
public.
Policy P-62: The trail system should users including groups such as adults,
serve local and regional users and be children, seniors, workers, the disabled
linked to the regional trail system. and other people engaging in either
passive and/or active pursuits including:
Policy P-63: Trails should provide for a. pedestrians,
the needs of a diverse population of b. recreation bicyclists,
x-�
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT
Added 11-01-04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
c. joggers/runners, Policy P-71: Provide foot/bicycle
d. in-line skaters, separation wherever possible; however,
e. bicycle commuters where conflict occurs, foot traffic should
f. canoeists and kayakers, and be given preference. (See
g. hikers. Transportation Element.)
Policy P-64: The trail system should be Policy P-72: Provide adequate
recognized and maintained by the City separation between non-motorized and
as distinct from informal or private motorized traffic to ensure safety. (See
pathways. Transportation Element.)
Policy P-65: Informal or private Policy P-73: Put major emphasis on
pathways should form a secondary establishing a"macro" system of trails
system with linkages to the public while identifying critical missing links in
system. These trails should be the existing functional system.
developed and maintained under joint
public/private partnership. Policy P-74: Address "micro" level
trails and fill gaps in existing trail
Policy P-66: Linkages should be patterns where appropriate.
provided with surrounding communities
within major regional corridors such as The adopted Long Range Parks,
the Cedar River, Green River, the Lake Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan
Washington Loop, and the Soos Creek shall be coordinated with and be an
Trail. integral component of the City's on-
going transportation planning activities.
Policy P-67: Within the City, linkages
should be provided among residential Policy P-75: As appropriate, encourage
areas, employment areas, centers, and the use of existing utility corridors for
recreation areas. trail purposes and secure trail easements.
Policy P-68: Integrate Renton's Policy P-76: Furnish trail systems with
recreational trail needs into a appropriate trailhead supporting
comprehensive trail system serving both improvements that include interpretive
local and regional users. anci directory signage, rest stops,
drinking fountains, bicycle racks,
Policy P-69: Plan and coordinate landscaping, parking, loading areas,
appropriate pedestrian and bicycle water, and other services.
commuter routes along existing minor
arterial and collector arterial corridors. Policy P-77: Where appropriate, locate
trailheads at or in conjunction with park
Policy P-70: Trails should be developed sites, schools or other community
in tandem with motorized transportation facilities to increase local area access to
systems, recognizing issues such as the trail system and to reduce duplication
safety, user diversity, and experiential of supporting improvements (e.g.
diversity. parking).
x-s
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy P-78: Provide opportunities for
the public to access, via Lake Policy P-84: Trails should be looped
Washington, the "Lakes to Locks" and interconnected to provide a variety
regional water trail system. of trail lengths and destinations.
Policy P-79: Design and develop trail Policy P-85: The functions of railroad
improvements to a standard that is easy and utility rights-of-way should be
to maintain and easy to access by assessed. Abandoned utility and/or
maintenance, security and other railroad rights-of-ways should receive
appropriate personnel, equipment and high priority far designation and
vehicles. acquisition of trail and/or corridors.
Policy P-80: Ensure development Policy P-86: Incorporate utility, storm
adjacent to trails is designed to minimize drainage, and other public lands into the
impacts to and enhance trails. trail system through cooperative use
agreements.
Policy P-81: Trail routes on private
lands are not classified as official trails Policy P-87: Develop and maintain
until the City has legal use authority. comprehensive trails systems, which
provide non-motorized access
Policy P-82: Trail alignments should throughout the City, maximize public
take into account soil conditions, slope, access to open space areas, and provide
surface drainage and other physical increased recreational opportunities for
limitations that could increase the public. (See Transportation Element
construction and/ar maintenance costs. Objective T-K.)
Policy P-83: Whenever possible,
recreation trails should not be part of a
street roadway. �
Objective P-G: Provide opportunities for public participation in recreational
services and programs that are creative, stimulating, educational, proactive, and
healthy and reflect the needs and interests of the community.
Policy P-88: Provide recreational is diverse, comprehensive, and enriching
activities specific and appropriate for to a variety age groups and abilities.
each age group.
Policy P-91: City of Renton residents
Policy P-89: Provide outdoor space for should be given priority or preference in
community and civic events,public registering for recreational programs and
gatherings, programmed activities, and use of park facilities.
entertainment.
Policy P-92: Non-resident fees should
Policy P-90: Develop a balanced be considered to help offset City
system of recreational opportunities that expenses for park and recreational
services and facilities.
X-9
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
community centers to meet differing age
Policy P-93: Make park facilities and and skill levels, and community interests
recreational programs available to non- and needs.
residents where this will not restrict or
will enhance enjoyment of recreation Policy P-100: Provide special indoor
opportunities for City of Renton and outdoor cultural and performing arts
residents. that enhance and expand music, drama,
dance, visual arts and other audience and
Policy P-94: Encourage and promote a participatory opportunities.
comprehensive, diverse and enriching
public art program throughout the City, Palicy P-101: Provide indoor space to
including the display of a variety of accommodate arts and crafts, music,
artwork in public places and buildings. video, classroom instruction, day care,
latchkey, physical conditioning,
Policy P-95: Provide a balance of gymnasiums, recreational courts, eating
recreational facilities for competitive and healthcare, and meeting facilities.
skill levels and income groups.
Policy P-102: Provide arts and crafts;
Policy P-96: Work with the arts classroom instruction in music, dance
community to utilize local resources and and arts; physical conditioning and
talents to increase public awareness of healthcare; day care; latch key and other
artwork and programs. program activities.
Policy P-97: Support successful Policy P-103: Provide soccer, baseball,
collaborations among the Municipal Arts so:ftball,basketball, volleyball, tennis,
Commission, business community, and other instruction and participatory
service groups, schools, arts patrons, and programs for a variety of age groups.
artists to utilize artistic resources and
talents to the optimum degree possible. Policy P-104: Provide nature
interpretation programs to increase
Policy P-98: Aquatic facilities should awareness, understanding and
provide recreational and instructional appreciation of Renton's wildlife and
uses that are available to a variety of age natural resource areas.
groups and abilities.
Policy P-105: Provide geographically
Policy P-99: Encourage the dispersed recreation opportunities, using
development, maintenance, and City-owned facilities, school district
operation of a variety of year-round, facilities and other non-profit agency
multi-use indoor facilities, including but facilities.
not limited to teen centers, senior '
centers, and activity, neighborhood and
Objective P-H: Develop and expand public and private partnerships to maximize
recreational opportunities.
x-�o
CITY OF RENTON PARKS ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Added 11-01-04
Policy P-106: Develop partnerships in the Long-Range Park, Recreation,
with school districts and non-profit Open Space, and Trails Plan.
agencies to provide indoor recreation,
athletic instruction, arts, cultural P�licy P-111: Coordinate with the
activities and facilities, meeting space, school districts, non-profit agencies, and
active outdoor recreation and special other jurisdictions on short and long-
activities. range park/recreational facilities
planning, acquisition, development, and
Policy P-107: Work closely with school facility utilization.
districts focusing on school areas with
attendance in the City and PAA to make Policy P-112: Where appropriate,
optimum use of school district facilities formalize partnerships through joint-use
for recreation, to provide effective agreements.
recreational programs and to develop
and maintain joint-use facilities for the Policy P-113: Coordinate volunteer
mutual benefit of the City and the efforts with businesses, non-profit
participating district. organizations, and community
organizations.
Policy P-108: Partner with non-profit
agencies, King County, the State of PQlicy P-114: Continue as the primary
Washington, the Federal government coordinating agency between the City
and other public and private service an�the state, county, and school district
providers to meet the cultural, for recreation.
recreational, social, and environmental
programs and space needs of the City. Policy P-115: Coordinate with other
governmental agencies and private
Policy P-109: Partner with neighboring organizations to provide a connected
cities in planning for sub-regional park open space system for the City and
facilities. surrounding region
Policy P-110: Partner with neighboring
cities in land acquisition, design,
development, and maintenance costs for
sub-regional park and recreation
facilities where there is a need identified
x-ii
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPfJRTATION ELEMENT
Exhibit `K'
Rev.il-Ol-04 QRDINANCE 1:3C>o ' "�
5499
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
GOALS
1. Gontribute to a balanced rnulti-modal transportation system thraugh reasonable,planned,econamically
feasible arterial irnprovements that enhance HOV and transit operations, support adopted land use plans,
protect or improve business access, and protect Renton's neighborhoods.
2. Maximize the use of transit in Rentan by providing step-by-step transit improvements to produce regionally
linked and locally oriented transit services and facilities needed to serve travel demand generated by Renton
residents and businesses.
3. Increase the person-carrying capacity af the Renton arterial system by the construction af improvements
and the implementation of actions that facilitate the flaw af HOVs into,aut af, and through Rentan.
4. Maintain,enhance, and increase pedestrian and bicycle travel by providing both safe and convenient routes
and storage far the commuting and recreating public.
5. Encourage and facilitate the reduction of commute and other trips made via single occupant vehicles.
6. Create efficiently functioning air transportation facilities that are respansibly integrated with the City's
transpartation system and land use pattern.
7. Maintain and improve h-uck and freight rail access ta Renton industrial areas,and integrate freight
transpartation needs into Renton's multi-madal transpartation system.
8. Develap a funding and implernentation program for needed transportation irnprovements supporting
adopted land use palicies,that distributes transportation costs equitably between public agencies and private
development.
9. Develop a transportation system that contributes to the attainment and maintenance of regional air and
water quality standards within the City of Renton, and carnplies with regianal, state, and Federal air water
quality standards,and preserves/protects natural resources.
10. Develop and maintain relationships between Rentan and other agencies and local jurisdictions for
caaperative planning af camman transportation impravements,and discussion of transportation-related
interests.
XI-1
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NC3. �C799
Rev.11-01-04
TABLE UF CUNTENTS
Page
Summary.......................................................................................................................................................6
GeneralPalicies.........................................................................................................................................7
Grawth Management Act Requirements...................................................................................................7
StreetNetwork..............................................................................................................................................8
Objectives..................................................................................................................................................8
Policies......................................................................................................................................................8
Inventoryof Existing Streets...................................................................................................................10
StreetSystem Characteristics..................................................................................................................12
Existing Street Functional Classifications.......................�..........................................................�....,.......12
Traffic Volumes and Forecasts ...............................................................................................................12
Levelof Service Policy...........................................................................................................................19
LevelOf Service Standard......................................................................................................................20
ArterialPlan............................................................................................................................................22
Transit.........................................................................................................................................................29
Objectives................................................................................................................................................29
Policies....................................................................................................................................................29
ExistingTransit Service..........................................................................................................................3Q
LocalAccess...........................................................................................................................................30
EastsideConnections...............................................................................................................................31
SouthKing County Connections.............................................................................................................31
East-West Connections...........................................................................................................................31
DowntownTransit Center..........................................................................................................34
CustornBus Service......................................................................................................................34
Park-and-Ride Facilities.............................................................................................................34
FutureRegional Accessibility.................................................................................................................34
TransitPlan.............................................................................................................................................34
Levelof Service......................................................................................................................................36
HighOccupancy Vehicle(HOV)................................................................................................................3$
Objectives................................................................................................................................................3$
Policies....................................................................................................................................................3$
ExisringHOV Facilities..........................................................................................................................38
H4VPlan................................................................................................................................................39
Levelof Service......................................................................................................................................42
Nan-Matorized Transportation...................................................................................................................43
Objectives................................................................................................................................................43
Policies....................................................................................................................................................43
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities..............................................................................................44
Neighborhoodand Regional Access.......................................................................................................46
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan.....................................................................................................46
Transportation Demand Managernentl Commute Trip Reduction(TDMICTR).........................................49
Objectives................................................................................................................................................49
Policies....................................................................................................................................................49
Existing Parking Supply and Demand.......................
..............................................................................50
ParkingPoticy Review......................................................................................
......................................52
Employers'Made Sp1it............................................................................................................................52
XI-2
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OFtDSNANCE Nt}. 5099
Rev.11-Oi-84
TDNUCTRPrograms...............................................................................................................................52
Parking Management Regularions...........................................................................................................53
Airpart.........................................................................................................................................................53
Objectives................................................................................................................................................53
Policies....................................................................................................................................................53
AirportFacilities.....................................................................................................................................54
AirportActivities.....................................................................................................................................54
Airport Master Plan Relevant Documents...............................................................................................54
Airport Master Plan Irnplementation.......................................................................................................55
Freight.........................................................................................................................................................55
Objectives................................................................................................................................................55
Policies....................................................................................................................................................55
TruckRautes...........................................................................................................................................56
Inventory of Local Rail System Facilities and Users..............................................................................58
RegianalAccessibility.............................................................................................................................59
Financingand Implementation....................................................................................................................60
Objectives................................................................................................................................................6Q
Policies....................................................................................................................................................51
TransportatianPragram Costs.................................................................................................................61
Inventaryof Funding Sources.................................................................................................................61
Funding Program...................................... .....64
..........................................................................................
FundingAssessment................................................................................................................................69
MitigationProcess...................................................................................................................................70
Concurrency Managernent System..........................................................................................................72
Environmental and Natural Resources........................................................................................................73
Objectives................................................................................................................................................73
Policies....................................................................................................................................................73
Air Quality--Irnplementation Plan ........................................................................................................74
ImpravingWater Quality........................................................................................................................74
Intergovernmental Coordination.................................................................................................................74
Objectives................................................................................................................................................75
Policies....................................................................................................................................................75
Current Caordination Activities..............................................................................................................75
Impacts on Adjacent 3urisdictions...........................................................................................................77
Impacts on Regional Transportation Plan...............................................................................................77
Strategies ta Address Inconsistencies......................................................................................................77
OngoingTransportation Plan Wark............................................................................................................84
XI-3
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT O RD I N AN C E N 0. 5 0 9 9
Rev.l l-01-04
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Existing Street/Highway System
Figure 1-2 Arterial System Characteristics
Figure 1-3 Arterial System Functional Classifications
Figure 1-4 2000 Daily Traffic Volumes
Figure 1-5 2022 Daily Traffic Volumes
Figure 1-6 Renton Arterial Plan
Figure 1-7 Arterial Plan Improvements
Figure 2-1 Existing Transit Service
Figure 2-2 Regional Transit System
Figure 2-3 Renton Transit Plan
Figure 3-1 Renton HOV Plan
Figure 4-1 Existing Non-Motorized Facilities
Figure 5-1 Downtown Core Existing Parking Summary 2001
Figure 7-1 Truck Routes
XI-4
CtTY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT pRDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.l l-01-04
TABLE OF TABLES
Table l.l Rentan Arterial Plan
Table 4.1 Proposed Bicycle Rautes
Table 5.1 Central Subarea Parking Summary
Table 8.1 20-Year(Transportation Program Cost
Table 8.2 Saurce af Transpartatian Funds
Table 8.3 City of Renton Six-Year Transpartation Improvement Program(TIP)2005-241Q
XI-S
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
SUMMARY
The Transportation Element of Renton's Comprehensive Plan serves several purposes. In addition to meeting
the State Growth Management Act(GMA)requirements for a transportation element,it assists the City in
coordinating transportation planning with land use planning and adequately serving existing and future
residential and employment growth. The Transportation Element, sometimes called a Transportation Plan,also
provides direction on coordinating the development of a multi-modal system,which is a system that
accommodates various modes of transportation. Finally,the transportation element coordinates transportation
projects with other relevant projects in adjacent jurisdictions and the region. This coordination is an important
element in creating an effective system and in competing for transportation funding.
The goal of the Renton Transportation Element is to provide "a balanced multi-modal transportation system that
will support land use patterns, and adequately serve existing and future residential and employment growth
within the City." (A multi-modal system is defined as one which provides various choices of transportation for
the public such as automobiles,buses,rail,transit,bicycles,walking.)
The main objective guiding the development of the Transportation Element is to be consistent with the City of
Renton Comprehensive Plan Policies,the State's Growth Management Act, County-wide Planning Policies,and
Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)legislation.
Another key objective of the Transportation Element is to "coordinate land use and transportation planning."
This is a requirement of the State's Growth Management Act. The Transportation Element must also be
coordinated with the Puget Sound Regional Council's(PSRC)VISION 2020 and Destination 2030(the adopted
long-range growth and transportation strategy for the Central Puget Sound area—King,Kitsap,Pierce, and
Snohomish counties).
A companion regional document is the Metropolitan Transportation Plan(MTP), also produced by the PSRC,
which specifically addresses regional transportation and how jurisdictional transportation plans fit within the
regional context. This City of Renton Transportation Element is consistent with GMA,VISION 2020,
Destination 2030,and the MTP.
The Comprehensive Plan(and Transportation Element)was adopted on February 20, 1995. Subsequent
transportation planning work and enactment of development regulations that are consistent with, and help
implement,the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Element have resulted in amendments
(December 8, 1997,July 27, 1998,August 14,2000,and August 13, 2001)to the Comprehensive Plan(and
Transportation Element). Further transportation planning work by the City has resulted in the 2004
amendments,which are incorporated in this Transportation Element.
As noted above,the overall intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to create a desirable land use pattern and serve
land uses with a multi-modal transportation system. This Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan
comprises a set of framework transportation policies to support Renton's land use Vision and a more detailed
and technical plan for implementation of the framework policies. T'he Transportation Element encompasses
several chapters,including Street Network,Transit,High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV),Non-Motorized
Transportation,Transportation Demand Management/Commute Trip Reduction(TDM/CTR),Airport,Freight,
Financing and Implementation,Environmental and Natural Resources, and Intergovernmental Coordination.
Some of the transportation policies apply to specific chapters;the policies compiled below apply to all of the
chapters.
XI-6
CITY OFRENT(�N TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.I 1-01-04
thase facilities within six years af the approval af
General Policies new development.
Policy T-1. Land use plans and regulations should Policy T-S. Land use and transportation plans
be used to guide development of the Transportation should be consistent so that land use and adjacent
Element for the City. transportation facilities are campatible with each
Palicy T-2. Transportation irnprovements shauld ather. Land use capacity/forecast assumptions used
support land use plans. in capacity/forecast madeting shauld be used in
estimating travel demand.
Palicy T-3. Transportation plans should be phased policy T-6. Land use patterns should support
concurrently with grawth. transit and non-motorized modes of travel.
Policy T-4. Adequate transportation facilities and policy T-7. The disruptive impacts of traffic
services shauld be in place at the time of occupancy related to centers and ernployment areas should be
or an adopted strategy must be in place to pravide reduced.
(In this context, disruptive impacts are primarily traffic. They cauld be mitigated by implementing programs,
such as transpartation management prograrns implernented through cooperative agreements at the work place,
flexible work hours,andlor sub-area planning policies supporting increased density.)
Increased land use densities and a balance af land use mixes in an urban setting wi11 result in fewer and sharter
vehicle trips. As peaple hegin ta live closer ta employment and shapping, they will na longer need to drive to
these facilities and they wil]be able to link trips,resulting in fewer vehicle trips.
In additzon to the Transportation-Land Use interactian,another issue that pervades many of the chapters of the
Transportation Element is that of parking. The lacation and supply of parking is an integral part of the lacal
transportation system. Inadequate parking can increase congestian on streets as people circle and hunt far
available spaces. Too much parking is an inefficient use of land and can deter transit use. A proper batance
needs to be achieved between parking supply and demand. Satellite parking and shuttle services and collective
structured parking are patential methods for increasing the parking supply. Nate: Any references in this
dacument ta downtawn parking restrictians andlar removal apply anly ta cammuterlemployee parking and not
ta business patranlcustamer parking.
Grawth Management Act Reqairements
The Crrowth Management Act specifies the fallowing minirnum requirements for information that is to be
included in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
1. Land use assumptions used in estirnating travel;
2. Facilities and serviee needs,including:
a. An inventary af air,water,and land transpartation facilities and services,including transit rauting,
ta define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning;
b. Level of service standards for the transportation system to serve as a gauge to judge perforrnance
of the system. These standards should be regionally coordinated, and adopted Level of Service
(LOS)policy and/or standards far state facilities shall be stated in local transportation plans.
c. Specific actions and requirements far bringing into compliance any facilities or services that are
below an established Li�S standard;
xi-7
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
d. Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information
on the location,timing, and capacity needs of future growth;
e. Identification of system expansion needs and transportation system management needs to meet
current and future demands;
3. Demand Management Strategies
4. Finance, including:
a. An analysis of funding capability to judge needs against probable funding resources;
b. A multi-year financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan,the
appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street,road, or transit program
required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities;
c. If probable funding falls short of ineeting identified needs,a discussion of how additional funding
will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that LOS standards will be
met;
5. Intergovernmental coordination efforts,including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation
plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions.
STREET NETWORK
Traffic generated by employment centers,regional pass-through traffic using local streets, and truck traffic all
contribute to congestion and reduced accessibility within the City of Renton. In resolving traffic flow problems,
a number of choices will need to be made. In some cases, increasing traffic flows only increase congestion on
local streets or impact pedestrians,yet if traffic flows are reduced accessibility can be compromised.
Alternately, if the local street system is efficient and not congested it will attract increased regional traffic.
The objectives and policies in the Street Network chapter are intended to reduce the amount of traffic that has
neither an origin nor destination in the City of Renton while at the same time providing reasonable levels of
traffic flow and accessibility on the local street system. These objectives and policies also address issues related
to the street network as a system,the physical design of individual roadways,traffic flow,and traffic operations
control.
The Street Network Chapter contains a detailed review of the City of Renton's street system—including
existing functional classifications as well as a description of Renton's Arterial Plan. The Street Network
Chapter also contains discussion of the Level of Service criteria used to judge performance of the system. (The
service levels were developed in conjunction with King County adopted Level-of-Service Framework Policies
and other local jurisdictions.)
Objectives
The Street Network Chapter is based on the following objective:
T-A: Create a comprehensive street system that provides reasonable vehicular circulation throughout the City
while enhancing the safety and function of the local transportation system.
Policies
xI-8
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-OI-04
Paiicy T-8. Each street in the City should be Policy T-14. Proactively work with the state and
assigned a functianal classification based an factors neighboring jurisdictions ta provide capacity an
including traf�c volurnes,type of service provided, regianal transportation systems and to reduce
land use,and preservation of neighborhoods. regional traffic on lacal streets.
Policy T-9. Streets and pedesirian paths in Policy T-15. Develop strategies to reduce adverse
residential neighbarhoods should be arranged as an traffic impacts on local areas. (areas of the City
interconr�ecting network that serves local traffic and that require this type of intervention should be
facilitates pedestrian circulation. identified and addressed through the sub-area
planning process,neighborhood plans,or traffic
Policy T-9.1. Street vacations should be supported mitigation programs that are implemented through
when: development review.)
• The right-af-way to be vacated is not needed
for future public use; Policy T-16. Access management, such as
• The right-af-way to be vacated is not needed restricting left turns and excessive use of
for the interconnection af the roadway system; driveways, shauld be caardinated with design
+ The abutting property owners have standards and land use in arder ta enhance public
demanstrated a need for the street vacation; safety and preserve traffic carrying capacity.
and,
* The resultant road can�guratian, after the street {Alsa see related policzes in the HOV, Transzt,Non-
vacation,canfarms to adopted City plans. motorized and Freight sections of this Element and
af the Community Design Element.)
Policy T-9.2. Street vacations should anly be
supported in Downtown and neighborhoods that
have developed around a traditional grid system
when the resultant road configuration after the
street vacation does not significantly interrupt the
function of the overall grid system.
Palicy T-10. Street standards shautd continue to be
based on functional classification,land use
objectives, and Ht3Vltransit/non-motorized facility
needs. (The street standards should be caardinated
with the abjectives and palicies af the Cammunity
Design Element.)
Policy T-11. A level of service should be
maintained that: maximizes mability by
emphasizing transit and HOV irnprovements; is
coordinated with level of service standards of
adjacent jurisdictions; and rneets State requirements
under GMA and concurrency.
Policy T-12. Traffic flow an and accessibility to
arterial streets shauld be managed to maximize
persan-carrying capacity.
Policy T-13. Provide a balance between pratecting
neighborhaods fram increased through traffic while
maintaining access to neighborhaods.
XI-9
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Inventory of Existing Streets
The existing(2003)street/highway system serving Renton is shown in Figure 1-1. The system includes two
freeways: Interstate-405 and State Route-167 (the "Valley Freeway"). Interstate 405 provides connections to
the Eastside and Snohomish County to the north, and to I-5 and the Sea-Tac Airport area to the south. The
Valley Freeway extends south from I-405 to Kent,Auburn, and Puyallup.
In addition to the freeways,Renton is served by several other state highways,including SR-900 (Sunset
Boulevard), SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway), SR-515 (Benson Highway), and SR-167 (Rainier Avenue).
Each of these state highways are integral elements of Renton's internal arterial system. In addition, SR-900
provides external connections to Issaquah on the east and to the Boeing Field area and I-5 on the west. SR-
169 connects Renton to SR-18 and southeast King County, SR-515 provides the main arterial connection to
the unincorporated Soos Creek area,and the Rainier Avenue section of SR-167 connects Renton with south
Seattle.
xi-10
1 � ' 1 ' � � � � � � �� •
I 1�
� � �
• � �� .
11 �.f��; ' '�
"'' •
• ' �� � .�
#'f^^.y_.: �
x i r,�'
f,
•• • '� ���� ��� � �
4
� }
�,r- /1
.
� .�'
'���►' ���,�
��: ���� 1 �,�
� _ � �.,
�. �
�� �� �
���1' . �
��iilih. `°.�,� ' �
,�
q u�► � ■ r
,_. + ���
��I.���►�� �rlh � � � '���
,. ..i��i�i, .
` �iiillll►� �� ����
�i��nn[ �j �05�� • ��''"'!F�
�/i'1��111 �I�1�� _ �#����� 'i►�oo �F'1,� �
� -s�1�� �1�� �y � ��r����� il���l,�
���— �I1��1�i• � � ��..
Y , r�11 "=_''��: ..�.,�r �� .�.� .
�, .�� .ra-=► � r�� • k ,
� - �.� --, 1R��� ....��_ �
� � '\V '�:'�;" � _ � �`_'�� '�-- ■A
�� ��
► 1�.E� �r�� ,r���'. ��, y
���� �
`'\�lfD Jllli==�j`�.� ' �'�'��w''`, -!�5
����������� ���� �?, �����I�� ������i� � ���
_. , 1� 1 ��.1��' ��� ' ��
,�° � ��`���1 'r °<Il�li'� ' .
-�►�..�.� 1 ,� . ,����� � illl�
� ;�' ���� �!♦����.
�oo "'"�!�►� �7E7t►`���• �1 � �
�� f'�
��� �����'��� �'9�11111.�� ' 1 1 1 =
�, 1���� j�-.-rl��I:� 1 .
•�����' 169 !� � �
11 ,,,,.� - � ;��= � � � .�"� '�,1 �.j�
� y, ,� , .►
,,,..�.'""';" ..._ � �„ ;i�, �• )��r
�`,, � ■ �...�111 �. !�?/'�! �
�1��:�� �� "�C �� �'1��i � . ' '�'�►. �:;:. -
� � �� �� �•�..�
��
5���� / �'�— �il ���
� 5�5 � �
lr., �� .l � -����F�a� `
��1��.�rs e��,
5 �`�.�, :�� � , ; `�,Y� �
� ��` `llll��� ,. � /-_/-'
. , �'� ,67 F..� �, , � ` � •\..
181 � 4J, � ' � ���'�..
- .. �.
- -�� !� ����
1 �
� -.� , � K �,��..
L � �
� � ��i � �
�� � � . .
��� � �f� � S�
�� :�,� � ..��! � _ :
_� ,���. � .. ����� -i
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OR D I N AN C E N O. 5 0 9 9
Rev.11-01-04
Six routes,I-405, SR-167, SR-900, SR-169, SR-515,and SR-167, converge in central Renton within a half
mile radius of each other. This close proximity results in a complex traffic flow, as regional and local trips
interact within a relatively short distance.
Other key arterials that tie together the Renton street system include Grady Way and S.W. 43rd Street in the
Valley,Talbot Road and Puget Drive in southeast Renton,Park Avenue and Park Drive, Logan Avenue,and
Airport Way in Central Renton,and 3`�Street/4`h Street,Duvall,Union,and Edmonds Avenues in East
Renton. These arterials,with numerous other arterial streets, link commercial, industrial, and residential
neighborhoods to the freeways and state highways. Within neighborhoods, local access streets provide
internal circulation and connections to the arterials.
Street System Characteristics
Physical and traffic control characteristics of the Renton street system, including the location of traffic signals
and one-way streets, and the number of lanes on arterial street segments, are shown in Figure 1-2.
Existing Street Functional Classifications
The purpose of functional classifications is threefold: i)to identify appropriate uses for Renton streets,ii)to
establish eligibility for road improvement funding from various sources,and iii)to define appropriate street
design standards.
The arterial street functional classifications specified by the City of Renton include "Principal Arterial,"
"Minor Arterial," and"Collector Arterial" classifications. The adopted classifications in Renton, and the
surrounding annexation areas of unincorporated King County, and on several roadways in adjacent City of
Newcastle are shown in Figure 1-3.
"Principal Arterials"are streets and highways that connect major intra-city activity centers,have primarily
high traffic volumes that travel at relatively fast vehicle speeds, and therefore,have less emphasis on land use
access. Grady Way in south central Renton and N.E. 3`d/4"'Street in East Renton are examples of principal
arterials.
"Minor Arterials"are streets that provide links between principal arterials and collector arterials,and carry
moderately high traffic volumes at less vehicle speed than on principal arterials. These arterials also connect
intra-city activity centers with some emphasis on land use access. Southwest 7`�'Street in west central Renton
and Union Avenue in northeast Renton are examples of minor arterials.
"Collector Arterials"are streets that distribute traffic between principal and minor arterials and local access
streets. Collector arterials include streets that provide major traffic circulation with more emphasis on land
use access within commercial and industrial areas, and residential neighborhoods. East Valley Road in
southwest Renton and N.E. 12`i'Street in northeast Renton are examples of collector arterials.
Local access streets include all public streets not classified as principal,minor, or collector arterials. Local
access streets primarily provide direct access to abutting land uses and are to be designed to discourage use by
through traffic. These streets are identified by default on Figure 1-3 and are not listed in the legend.
Traffic Volumes and Forecasts
Existing(2000)and forecasted 2022*traffic volumes have been analyzed to reflect: i)latest regional and
Renton land use modifications ii)latest regional transportation plans, and Renton Arterial,HOV and transit
plans; iii)latest Renton mode split assumptions; and, iv)refinements to the City of Renton transportation
model.
xi-t2
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
*NOTE: Renton's transportation model utilizes regional land use data and trip tables provided by the Puget
Sound Regional Council (PSRC)for the horizon years 2000 to 2020. For the 2022 traffic volume forecast, a
linear growth rate was calculated(from 2000 to 2020)and then applied to the 2020 traffic volumes to obtain
2022 volume forecasts.
Arterial Traffic Volumes
In order to show the overall level and pattern of utilization of the Renton street/highway system,2000 and
2022 daily two-way traffic volumes were compiled(see Figures 1-4 and 1-5). The 2022 volumes reflect a
freeway/arterial network comprised of facilities existing in 2000 and the following arterial and HOV
improvements which are assumed to be implemented by 2022.
XI-13
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
FIGURE 1-2
ARTERIAL SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
Arterial System Characteristics �
(2003)
Legend �, 4 4 � +
Signalized � Transportation � �` .�
Intersection
Number 2 Plan �
of Lanes Z � � Castle
_ .../� -
City Limit � �
♦�' �/
Renton �
PLanningArea � ` *�T sa�
� � ♦ —
1 �
�
t �
a �
r ,
- - S , _.
� �
` Z L
� '� 7
.:S ' '
� \
� , 1 7 I �
Z </ � i �
� r � �
�
�ah se � r'a.
Z
"E I
' ♦ �.." See Insert ` --� 1
1 Z Ren�on �
.,,L � _i �
�� � -- Z =
\ i ' '� � —
l, f �•i�-
�`� ♦ Z 3 2 � - —
♦ z ♦ ^
' L
� � t � � �
=j 1 22 '
I
�� � '� 1 /"'G
I � � �'-aZ'l
- � 2 2 Insert � �
i � � � \ Z Z
I�il�� �� � 1 — 3 -
— 1 t " �. — �a ��z zz
� � 2 SYY urs 2 3 2 �3 2 7 3 �- 2 2 J 4 �
_ .Z � � _ 3— 3 g
/ _�'�pO^�'v_ 3 3
3
1 r � I �-3� i
�
, " 7 3 � ,
j � 3� ' j �� �� 4 4 4
7i v � 11 I 2
— t ,�� ' +2 2 —
�, 3
� I � � �'� 2 2
I I I � _ _ �I I t �-�- . � �
.
XI-14
CITY OF REIKTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDTNANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-41-44
FIGL:tRE 1-3
ARTERIAL SYSTEM FUNCTI4NAL CLASSIFICATI4NS
_ Q .
. 4
. � �C G
� � �
'� � � o y a-
�C � � � � m $ � �a u � m
� S t6 � � � at `o �`? a'." �'
s •9 c `; N��
a ¢ p � R � ti � ( � � �
�i� �y,! � �€�� �'R � ����Ra �pw '� ��¢i' S 7 y U 1
�g 8�x�g' � g�s'"�� �.� Q_��Ss,�;�tmay��g oi ^ �
�i � ��m_ $ ��9�i� �t5g ��'� �' ti' � O
{� T� �
��t �YI $ t 3m�' n sq y s ,�`X 8�. � — =
�s !� � ��� E���� ��xs�s��������`-���<�' � g�� � � � c
6 9S,j waAg 8II 9sg5 p8 �y ��ij � ��
��� �#�� � �E��Q�� 5�r�����081�5�s�y4giY�f6 � ^ � � <��
•����l� 'j Y� 6"' �g8����`���5<id$St��2� a � �L � ��
��� ���� � s���`" �� ����$����� ����� �� _-a a r
� ���������� ������� : ����s����l������l�,�� �� � � ��h..
�' � ���� ���! R # �W�- � ���������,��$�r������ �s
� z �������'� � ; s��=� `s �_����6�.��5<�<���«��< �
g�' � � YI� ��klffi S ��'��a� � ��8��7��}�$������§��,`a_ �`'o
s'� � Sa��E9EsttA � '�aT�ma � oeRg���7�R�#iGnSf&3��E4�h&t ;��
a
� �S
� „ �� z
� � � � � �" �� � � � �'��_ �""� 3 ��€ 9 �""� �s
�i p$ ��� �� � � � � f� g ��� � � �������������� ���€i�$ ��
�;�1�:���� ! :���� ��� ��&1�� ;,'�� � i�¢ E�' I,�: �3� €:� �:���� ��i�����:�
� ��#'� aa$+ ��'� £',� �� °i»��a �6 �`d�a�i $� sz�pzu���3�����'� ��a s g
��� '°�}f"� �.�� � ,� s �tlYaa. '� � a � a ID tase tQ �a�'°�K="a�� �
���{'fTi!�E #f�=�;Ij, 'fx�q♦�'1�l� � �'��+{p�e(�$p� ��3,� .� ,$ �"�_; �� #}���
����l�fi}; .G�ly,����'�� ��3;��`2j� A; ��l�i�� "'SZ/y •��Z�������RSz�`�$�aS����,��j�oi��3l
����� _��'$ a �Gj,� �'� £ ��,}�'�p��aMi $��� #ffi �� �.&����� ������8� ��,�3�� �z
� a f� �� S !(����I�����$ �$���d:� rz;��f�� �¢�yTi .*� .& 3 't �3��u`°i��a���,�
� � �g d .� � e!! �� � �y �x �a s a :
� z ���" m��ff� ��g'��8n�� : ��E€��Y��� 3��F����� �� �.��.�3�.�.�.���`� �� �.��ti.��5,������
� � ���r�_�����@��� ��,,� ` ��.� f# �!� ��E �f d�g�" �y,;�,�,����,����� ���"��x ,�� �.�
o � �' 1�'���'���'a frr+����`�r'� < l���� ��j+�l�rfts�4 ������ f� 34�����g����y �� ���3�����
�' � ���#�s������»�t��i��� � �������.:�����a¢�����7i��' �tb���������B��x�b�i�����������a
V iC —Nwitl�n:it6�NM�tl���.s.�'ndp,� � ����Ra»axtxrt�Kx�iss��Yss€os� c�a:;���a����aaaaaa�aas����A�x�t�
- �"./ � J
� -� -
��
_ �
- -�
, - .. �
_ �..... .. .
_ �_ ,, -
_., . ��. - - -�
, , .
- , ,_� �- -
, -
� , �- � - -,
� �-�-
_ . - �
s • �� r Q
* ' s = . a �.- '� tJ
,..
y . .
:.:.. - . . : x .' . . . �
- . z. �;.:,., . . k
.
_- r � A� „ , .. �1
a
s s °.s - � �- .
_ =a , � o / �
g ' .��,� F �
� I l
i s —
_ _ � ._.. . � ..�'
C ]�
C ` �tVr��
1 �
x - '-�'T
- " ! ' + � ._h—:�� .,
XI-25
- --
� � � � � � � . � , � �. .
i i-
111 � • ' � , �
� �;-,._ ,�, v�
�� ' - �
#; •
4�� �
�„�,t,�(., � y -
�
��`�� �µ�
� � ��s,�`.S,-.t 3 -�-`,. I �i
� + �
- � � � �
a`;:-e �":� '�� ��C i►,,
���.
�� ��ti 111 �
� ■ ,
�
�'�� ��� � �
��■ l �
.r.
����1 +'�'.'��� ' �
1�1► ���
'� ���' .M..�`�•1��a``►-•�I,�,:::.
���►. �� r� ,�'� � � ��ii
,��'�'�� �� t,. 9 , , r � w 4,
.����,1i1►� ��t�: - �os �,�-- ����-,�,,�r�
V��i�l�1�� 1 1�� ����� nt�/�r�
�11��1����� ��� � i�-��C'✓
�iw ����� _ ��= � _, 900 ,
_.`��TI I���..>>•� -1��������,��
=�� .� ..._ �.
, �
� �_ ��'�;��==►�. ��: ' �,r�,� �`!'� ���E'�� , .
� - ■ �1■�� �!� •� � � ��� ���'��
�1�`I~Y1���' �o�`�'��""� ..�l11 �
----� �.� �
` `i � ,�1111--- �,-�r �� r
,�\�irt► �����===f ir1�, _ � � �'�� ; '��'=!��
`� '���' �� f 1 �►� �l�![� i����� " � -.,,,
��, �■�..�,' 11► . .�'��;. ��;,�,.�i
� �� ,►�i I�C ��7E3'���7,/�� � � �1
�•�� L � ,-r�,;!i:;�� r� 1
: \�`�.irr'� � '
eoo �,. / ���t,�,� � .��,��� �� �
�.' .
�_ �►
"�+.��a•��✓��l�� ���`�;'y....., � I � � �
�
� ��r��� ^r i�r_.�ri ,,� �
r 169 �
, �`�-�''��8i��; .-_ . �,� '"' ���.�
�= ,, �.� .:, �'�� ��r� ,� , �.� �� �
a�ll
11 � ���--���i���� � �► w .� �
► �� �,,.;�,��,� � �
,. �.�
� `�� • �
,�< , ���.-�- .n�rwi�.:;�wlte� �1►�" �j1i� �;
.��r�° ���;�1li: � �� ���►�'' �
. �
����, ,,� ���.��,,��.� �
- ■� �/■ m .�
r, 1�5':��,� �_I� } n► F�a, •�
� I �������:
_�..�, M�`...•��
' ; ��� � ��� �. .
„��i
1� ,e�� �
'IBt � i�� �
� � �� ���� � �
� _�;`I _ � �"'y� ' �. �� •• •
_ ,� ; � �
` '� "' .
; ,_ �, �� .
� •
� � � � � �
� �i, � � � � • �. .
1 � � ' • •
��, �; A 1�
rr �� � I
� : I C
� � � � ��� �� �
��fi � �
� �� � � �
��� �
� ���.,�z� //,�:
r���p�` ,��� I►�
�; $ �`�� • �
�,�� 111 �
. �,,�� �
�. �
� �_�.,,, �
.►. �.-,- # �. . ,
1111�. ; � � � �-�� �, -
��u � �_�--�,�� _ _ =.,. ���
�.��1►. �� �Nl�il � ` -�r
�����► � �� „ ���
��Alli�� � p �
'r �\ aos �;J� ���rr�i"����
V�►�i�i��[� �� � �
� �II���
����.���n li�•��� , ���
�;�� �1��� �u � 1�- 3 , 9� �:
_ `�� i��_.>>,, �J -L'�����,�-„�,,/M�
----�� ; �. r,
� , _ r�11�,-=s.==`► ��:��: �� ,, �,�,,� ,�*`• : ■t, , -
�� � �f�;\I������!!►,;, � � �`�—��,,�a; ��!i�
�'1�����1��=� � �� ��i�`�'1��'�O IL �L�
��.�� ��, �'� �
` \� ,11111�=�
,', 1��► ;111��==�j� ' ' �!�'`''��r �'�!�� -
�� � �'1 I.,L �� ` �L�R� �,J���1; �.r ■ _ ,.
��V'��.,��'['1 �11� ,���� �� , ��
i� ,'s �
� � �,i_��
�"� , ....����1. 1�:, �a�E� '►��:1�' � ��
���r � �w��..u; rj�;"��������� ■ ` �
� �, t'G � �.� , t�.
��� �� 1�r�e„����J�,• �! r '
f "�+ � ' I 1 I w
���* `����,9��j��1 �+ 1
.=L �1'1��� �� lE,'I_:�(1 '"I 1
. �
,�,�'���,8�r� ,�9 _�,� .. �ii,�...
�� � 7, ��� ]� ���;����i, 1 � �t ��� �fE
► � ��,,�A�`e,�„��; ,, i
��:,,�"_.�%•— ,.� ♦ f'
,�a �,:u�wwi�1■If 'a:�.�lli[e �,1�,�''`'+ �j�� +�
/I aos �E; �l��•'� _ + � � � � :
�� �• �„ ��I �.������l���
�i ' �,� � �����il '�is
■ r ,�-515� r F
� 3 •� ��i IA �v► �
..�
``;"��
� ' � f�' �
�. � � ';s�p �t r , .. .
�8, , � .
�a �,�
� � -�� � '.tiY� � �, �>
:i� � ��v;:��"� � �- .. .
,i ` ��
.
� -
, „ � ..
�.. � , . .
w
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Arterial improvements:
• Puget Drive Southeast–Benson Road to 116`�'Avenue Southeast
• Southwest 27"'/Strander Boulevard Connection–Oakesdale Avenue Southwest to SR-181
• Duvall Avenue Northeast–Sunset Boulevard to City Limits
• Widen Bronson Way–South 2°d Street to Sunset Boulevard
• Lake Washington Boulevard–Park Drive to Coulon Park
• Oakesdale Avenue–Monster Road to SR-900
• South Grady Way/Rainier Avenue South–Intersection Improvements
• Northeast 44`i'Street–Ripley Lane to Lake Washington Boulevard N.E.
• SR-167/East Valley Road Off-Ramp
• NE 3`d Street–Sunset Boulevard to Edmonds Avenue N.E.
HOV improvements:
• Full HOV interchange at I-405/Northeast 44`h Street
• Add HOV lanes on I-5–Seattle CBD to Tacoma
• I-405 HOV Direct Access at Park Drive ar North 8"'Street
• Half or full HOV interchange at I-405Benson Road or Talbot Road(SR-515)and HOV lanes on
SR-515 or Benson Road South from the new HOV interchange to Puget Drive
� Half HOV interchange at SR-167/S.W. 27`�'Street and HOV lanes on S.W. 27�''Street from SR-
167 to Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
• HOV lanes or intersection queue jump on SR-169–Sunset Boulevard to east city limits
• HOV lanes or intersection queue jump on N.E. 3rd/N.E.4�''Street–I-405 to Monroe Avenue
Northeast
• Transit Lane–South Grady Way to South Third Street
High-volume arterial corridors include Rainier Avenue and Airport Way, each with over 30,000 vehicles per
day(vpd), and Renton Avenue,North Park Drive-Sunset Boulevard Northeast,Northeast 3rd Street/4"'Street,
Talbot Road South, Southwest 43rd Street and South Grady Way-Main Avenue South, each carrying over
20,000 vpd(volume numbers in 2000).
The forecasted 2022 volumes show significant increases over 2000 volumes. On major arterial corridors,
volumes are forecasted to increase on the order of 40% - 100%over the 22-year period. The highest-volume
arterial corridor in 2022 is Rainier Avenue,with forecasted daily volumes of 20,000-66,000 through
Renton. Maple Valley Highway(SR169)also has forecasted volumes in excess of 40,000 vpd. Other high-
volume arterials with forecasted volumes in excess of 30,000 vpd are listed below:
South Grady Way
Airport Way/Logan Avenue NE 3Ta Street/N.E. 4�Street
North Park Drive/NE Sunset Boulevard
Sunse�Boulevard North(west of I-405) �
S/43-Street/South Carr Road/S.E. 176–Street/Petrovitsky Road
Traffic volumes on the freeway system are also forecasted to increase significantly by 2022,with daily
volumes of over 200,000 on most segments of I-405 and over 120,000 on SR-167 (Valley Freeway)through
xi-18
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Renton. The forecasted I-405 volumes are equivalent to current volumes on I-5 at the Ship Canal Bridge,
where I-5 has eight mainline lanes plus four reversible roadway lanes(as compared to the two lanes plus an
HOV lane in each direction on I-405). The I-405 Corridor is vital for regional connections between Renton
and other Puget Sound cities and for the economic vitality of the city. At the same time,the traffic that
overflows out of the corridor will severely impact the City's streets and neighborhood livability.
Level of Service Policy
Numerous jurisdictions define Level of Service(LOS)using the traditional Highway Capacity Manual
(Transportation Research Board,National Research Council, 1997). This LOS concept quantifies a motorist's
degree of comfort as they travel through an intersection or along a roadway segment. The degree of comfort
includes such factors as travel time,amount of stopped delay at intersections,impedance caused by other
vehicles and safety. Six Levels of Service are defined using letter designations--A,B, C,D, E and F,with a
LOS A representing the best operation conditions and LOS F the worst. LOS B represents stable flow with
somewhat less comfort and convenience than does LOS A. At LOS C, comfort and convenience declines
noticeably. At LOS D, speed and freedom to maneuver are restricted. At LOS E, speeds are low. Flow is
relatively uniform flow,but there is little freedom to maneuver.
Prior to 1995,the City of Renton policy was primarily focused toward improving roadway capacity for single
occupancy vehicle(SOV)travel. However,because of traffic congestion in the I-405 and SR 167 corridors,
traffic is overflowing off of these facilities onto congested arterials and diverting through Renton
neighborhood streets. Trying to solve the problem solely through building facilities to improve roadway
capacity only attracts more traffic onto Renton's streets.
In recognition of the regional nature of the traffic problems faced by Renton and the basic impossibility of
building enough roadway capacity to alleviate traffic congestion,the City of Renton revised its LOS policy in
1995 to emphasize the movement of people,not just vehicles. T'he new LOS policy is based on three
premises:
• Level of Service(LOS)in Renton is primarily controlled by regional travel demands that must be
solved by regional policies and plans;
• It is neither economically nor environmentally sound to try to accommodate all desired single
occupancy vehicle(SOV)travel; and
• The decision-makers for the region must provide alternatives to SOV travel.
Renton's LOS policy is based on travel time contours which in turn are based on auto,transit,HOV,non-
motorized, and transportation demand managemenbcommute trip reduction measures. The LOS policy is
designed to achieve several objectives:
• Allow reasonable development to occur;
• Encourage a regionally-linked, locally-oriented,dynamic transportation system;
• Establish a LOS standard that meets requirements of the Growth Management Act and King County's
adopted Level-of-Service Framework Policies;
• Require developers to pay a fair share of transportation costs; and
• Provide Renton flexibility to adjust its LOS policy if the region decides to lower regional LOS by not
providing regional facilities.
XI-19
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
The City of Renton LOS standard is used to evaluate Renton citywide transportation plans. The auto,HOV
and transit elements of the LOS standard are based on travel times and distance and are the primary indicators
for concurrency. The non-motorized and TDM measures serve as credit toward meeting multi-modal goals of
Renton and the region. Renton's LOS standard sets a travel time standard for the total average trip rather than
single intersections, and it provides a multi-modal LOS standard that conforms with current regional and local
policies requiring encouragement of multi-modal travel.
The Renton LOS standard has been refined to provide a system for use in evaluating transportation plans.
This process includes the following:
• Determination of existing travel times within the City of Renton;
• Calibration of the City of Renton traffic model to reflect existing SOV and HOV travel times;
• Determination of future SOV and HOV travel times for the adopted Land Use(described in the Land
Use Element)using the calibrated traffic model;
• Development of transit travel times using indicators of transit access,intra-Renton travel time to
regional system, and regional travel time;
• Development of a city-wide LOS travel time standard(index)using the most recent existing travel
time data;
• Development of transit and HOV mode splits;
• Development of a twenty-year LOS standard using the most recent travel time index as the standard;
• Testing transportation plans using LOS policy and standard to gauge the performance of the local
transportation system,including State-owned facilities; and
• Selecting a plan that maintains the established LOS standard.
Other elements of the LOS implementation process include:
• Monitoring the area to re-validate transportation plans;
• Adjusting transportation plans as needed to meet standards and/or address other
environmental/coordination issues; and
• Providing flexibility to modify the LOS standards over time(if needed).
Level Of Service Standard
A Citywide 2022 Level of Service standard has been developed for the City of Renton. The following
demonstrates how Renton's LOS policy was used to arrive at the 2022 LOS standard.
A 2002 LOS travel time index has been determined for the City by establishing the sum of the average 30-
minute travel distance for SOV,HOV,and Transit as follows:
2002 Average PM peak travel distance in 30-minutes from the City in all directions
SOV I HOV I 2 times Transit I LOS
(includes access time) Index
16.6 miles � 18.7 miles � 6.8 miles � 42* ,
* Rounded
XI-20
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
As indicated in the above table: a single occupant vehicle(SOV)could expect in 2002 to travel
approximately 17 miles in 30 minutes; a high occupant vehicle(HOV-carpool,vanpool)could expect to
travel approximately 19 miles in 30 minutes; and a transit vehicle could expect to travel approximately 7
miles in 30 minutes. It should be noted that the transit index value takes into account the time to walk from
the work site or residence to the bus stop and the time spent waiting for the bus to arrive. The initial value
(3.4 miles in 2002)is then weighted by doubling it(to 6.8 miles)to recognize the advantage that the transit
mode has over SOV and HOV modes in its passenger-carrying capacity.
The 1990 LOS index of 49,and the basis for the 2010 LOS standard,presented in Renton's Comprehensive
Plan adopted in 1995,was based on raw data collected prior to 1994. Subsequently in mid-1995,this raw
data was updated using an enhanced Renton(1990-2010)transportation model,which resulted in a 1990 LOS
index of 46. After calibration of a 2002 transportation model that reflects 2002 (and 2022)land use data and
examining the raw data,the 2002 LOS index was found to be 42. This reduction in LOS index could be
attributed to: i)reduced King County Metro transit service in Renton,especially in the Renton Valley area, as
a result of regional funding constraints(e.g.passage of Initiative 695); ii)limited implementation of Sound
Transit's planned express bus service and HOV direct access projects; and,iii)higher growth rate of
vehicular traffic than anticipated for the period of 1990—2002.
The 2002 LOS index is the basis for the 2022 standard. The average SOV 30-minute travel distance is
forecast to decrease by 2022. SOV improvements alone will not maintain the 2002 LOS standard in 2022. A
combination of HOV and/or transit improvements will need to be implemented to raise the HOV and/or
transit equivalents to maintain the 2022 LOS standard.
With the 2002 LOS index as a base,the City-wide 2022 LOS standard has been determined as follows:
2022 Average PM peak travel distance in 30-minutes from the City in all directions
SOV HOV 2 times Transit LOS
( I (includes access time) Standard
15*miles � 17*miles � 10* miles � 42 ,
*Rounded
This standard will require that the travel time of SOV(15)+HOV(17)+2 T(10)or the sum of these three
modes(42)must be maintained in the year 2022 and intervening years.
The improvements in the Transportation Plan Arterial,HOV, and Transit Sub-Elements that are designated
for Renton have been tested against the above LOS standard to ensure that the Transportation Plan meets
2022 demands for traffic growth/land use development. To test against the LOS standard,the 2022 planned
Arterial,HOV,and Transit improvements identified later in this Transportation Element are programmed into
the 2022 Traffic Model. The Traffic Model then calculates the average travel speed for the SOV,HOV,and
Transit*modes along specified travel routes(which have been broken into segments of known distance)
including those routes that have been identified for improvements by the year 2022. The Traffic Model then
converts the travel speed along known distances into travel distances in 30 minutes for each mode of travel.
The 2022 standard is met if the sum of the SOV,HOV, and Transit travel distance indices equa142.
*Other factors are considered for calculating the transit LOS index including frequency of service and access
time.
Additional information describing the methodology for determining Renton's LOS standard is provided in the
City of Renton Level of Service Documentation, September 1995.
XI-21
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance(HSS)(i.e. I-5, I-405, SR 167)have been adopted in
1998 by the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT). For urban areas the adopted LOS
standard is equivalent to the traditional LOS D. LOS standards for regionally significant state highways
(non-HSS)in the Central Puget Sound region(i.e. SR-900, SR-169, SR-515)were adopted by the Puget
Sound Regional Council(PSRC)on October 30,2003. For urban areas the adopted LOS standard ranges
from LOS E/mitigated(pm peak hour LOS is below the traditional LOS E)to the traditional LOS D. (Further
information on LOS standards for HSS and non-HSS facilities can be found on WSDOT and PSRC web sites,
respectively.)
Both Highways of Statewide Significance and regionally significant state highways are included in the
inventory of all state-owned facilities within Renton's city limits. These state-owned facilities have been
factored into Renton's modeling estimates of Renton's projected growth, and this local modeling estimate
identifies how Renton's Comprehensive Plan land use and growth projections may impact state-owned
facilities. These state-owned facilities are also included in Renton's city-wide travel-time based LOS
standard,which is influenced by stopped delay at intersections and on roadway segments by impedance due
to queuing vehicles. These same factors,as well as travel time, are elements of the traditional LOS concept
(A through F). To maintain Renton's LOS standard Renton's Transportation Element has identified SOV,
HOV,and transit-oriented improvements to state-owned facilities within Renton, as well as the local roadway
system.
Arterial Plan
This Street Network Chapter includes an Arterial Plan developed to make reasonable SOV improvements in
the City of Renton from 2002 to 2022. These arterial improvements are intended to enhance multi-modal
corridor capacity on the Renton arterial system,and/or to provide new arterial and freeway connections as
necessary to support the multi-modal concept. Also,the improvements comprised by the Arterial Plan have
been identified through the land use and transportation planning process as improvements that protect or
improve neighborhoods, improve safety, improve business access, and are economically feasible. The
Renton Arterial Plan is shown in Figure 1-6. The improvements included in the Arterial Plan are listed in
Table 1.1 and their location shown in Figure 1-7.
The Arterial Plan(Figure 1-6)includes segments of several King County and City of Newcastle arterials.
The list of arterial improvements includes several proposed King County improvements within the sphere of
influence of Renton's Land Use Element. Also, several Tukwila,Kent, and Newcastle proposed
improvements are included in the list in Table 1.1 due to their influence on the Renton arterial system.
(These improvements have been compiled from the Tukwila,Kent,and Newcastle Transportation
Improvement Programs and the King County Transportation Plan: Annual Transportation Needs Report.)
The improvements listed on Table 1.1 are the arterial/freeway mitigation measures for the Land Use Element
of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. These improvements,along with the Transit Plan and HOV
improvements identified later in this document,provide a transportation plan that will meet the 2022 Level of
Service standard and will be concurrent with land use development envisioned by 2022.
XI-22
� � ' � ' � � � � . � � • •
I I�
� �
� � . � • � .
._ � ■ „--,"��
11 . 1 �'�- ��
�.-��,�?:>,� •
��_
� �. -st �
� ,�}� c�
�- E
•• • c=. � ' �
�
�� �r Q
. �,,
• !�•'
�I�� �.�
..- � - �
. ' : : � . �: ��► 111 ���
= � `i:3� �''`�
— ��
.,".r � � � i . . .
%:m_� �,
���i�' ' . .�������� �:.:. � `�� ���
... � ;,� = � �.:. „ �7,,
—";,�
..
�-� � �o5��j� ����:��
: .: Ila�� r� • _ �'
� r nu► 1.����` : IE�11��� ■�.� � '�
�. �.r.��� I�1���,,o �.. `��'�-' ,������ ��:°��
, ' � r�lf�==�==� - �'� �+'�!���'��='��''��'�"�1 ��" ,
Gr`I�`'�1j�'�;' � � .,�. �_
= � � �nr� �� �r 1
===e.��� - ��`I! r��'�� �' •
� `��\�it� /�ini==�- � �'``�'I -�"���� ��
���� � �\ 1 �r� � �� � ,�.�l.� �,i■� � �
���..:.����i i��!� �N1 � i��5.,.�� �!e"��� ��5��'
I /'��.`�,►�� 1�,; . ■�nE. ;����!r�
� •����� ���� ..�� ��� ;'"�; � �����C � ,�� ;
; 900 �,���j�jj ����� � �� � E
..f .,�- � ���l��a�'l� �".lc-i kii �.� � � � � i �C" �
�, �� �4'��'�' u.��_, � � �
��� �I. ' 169. � ��
� . r�- ���i_ 1 "!,►� �''ll
�� ,��,
v `�
�� �� � � � � �
� �� ��� i � �`�� ���i
� , - � �
.
,�,%.,- �.� `��` ��f;
- �
��, � _� .,.��.����;�III� ( �� ' !���; ff
` r;: ;05 ■�i 1 � �,�,�'��'�.�```�'' '� _.�::
- -���.� ,�
. �� ��� t� ���-,-��, � _ F
�lr., ■ �;;5�� !/r��_I� }'� ..,�,, �
5 •..� -� r` rN�
� .�II�i.��rs ` �
� �� � ,�` ' ` �_ ' - ��`� �
-
., - ,�, �. _ IIIL,�� .. � •�
,8, �� ���� �- _. , � �; � _ ��.,
.
, _ .r �c I
, ' '� = � vK ���'
1 ` ��5�►�r►�
• �� � .
L ,.. r, . ��
� , � .
���� � t; � �
�
f
� � ��
� ���� ��
- � �_
Y
_,,�■�I�. ��E'
_� � � �%
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
TABLE 1.1
RENTON ARTERIAL PLAN
2002—2022 IMPROVEMENTS
1. Bronson Way — South 2°d Street to Park Avenue North arterial
improvements/bridge
rehabilitation
2. South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements
• Logan Ave N—North 6"'to Garden Avenue N new arterial
• Park Avenue N—North 6"'to Logan Avenue N arterial widening
• North 10"'Street—Logan Avenue N to Garden Avenue N new street
• North 8�'Street—Logan Avenue N to Park Avenue N new street
3. CBD Streetscape street improvements
4. Rainier Avenue—South 4�'Place to South 7�'Street arterial widening/RR
over crossing
replacement
5. Grady Way-Main Avenue to West City Limits arterial improvements
6. Lind Avenue Southwest- Southwest 16`�'to Southwest 43rd Street arterial widening
7 NE 2°a and NE 6`h Street—Duvall Avenue NE to 156`�'Avenue SE street improvements
8. Duvall Avenue Northeast—Sunset Boulevard to East City Limits arterial widening
9. Oakesdale Avenue Southwest - Monster Road to SR-900 arterial widening
10. S.W. 27`�Street/Strander Boulevard—SR-181 to Oakesdale Avenue Southwest new arterial
11. Sunset Boulevard/Duvall Avenue NE intersection
improvements
12. Rainier Avenue—Grady Way to North City Limits arterial improvements
13. Puget Drive Southeast-Jones Place Southeast to Edmonds Avenue Southeast arterial widening
14. Benson Road—South 26`�'Street to South 31S`Street safety improvements/
arterial widening
15. Talbot Road — Southwest 43`�to South City Limits arterial widening
16. N.E. 3rd/N.E.4`�'Corridor Improvements—Sunset Boulevard to East City Limits arterial improvements
17. Mill Avenue South/Carr Road intersection
improvements
18. Lake Washington Boulevard.—Park Avenue North to Coulon Park Entrance arterial improvements
19. Park Ave.N. /Sunset Boulevard—Garden Avenue N.to Duvall Avenue N.E. safety/mobility
improvements
20. S.W. 7`�'Street/Lind Avenue S.W. safety improvements
21. South Renton Neighborhood Improvements street improvements
22. N.E. 8�'and NE 10`�'Street—Union Avenue N.E. to Duvall Avenue N.E. street improvements
23. NE 4th Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE intersection
improvements
24. Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)—I-405 to East City Limits safety/mobility
improvements
OTHER JURISDICTION PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
TUKWILA:
25. West Valley Highway(SR 181)/South 156`"Street intersection
improvements
26. West Valley Highway(SR 181)—I-405 to Strander Blvd. arterial improvements
27. Nelsen Place—South 156`�to South 158`�' street improvements
XI-24
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
KENT:
28. South 196`i'/192nd Street Corridor(Phase III) -East Valley Highway to SR515 new arterial
29. 80�'Avenue South—South 196"'to South 188"' arterial widening
NEWCASTLE:
30. Coal Creek Parkway(Phase 2 and 3) SE 84`�'Way to SE 95`�'Street arterial widening
31. Newcastle Way— 112`�'Avenue SE to 129'i'Avenue SE arterial widening
32. Newcastle Way/ 116"'Avenue SE intersection
improvements
33. 112�'Avenue SE—SE 64�'Street to Newcastle Way arterial widening
34. 116t''Avenue SE—Newcastle Way to SE 88"'Street arterial improvements
35. 112`"Place SE—West City Limit to 116�'Avenue SE arterial improvements
KING COUNTY:
36. Duvall Avenue NE/Coal Creek Parkway—Renton City Limits to Newcastle City arterial widening
Limits(SE 95`"Way)
37. South 192°d Street-SR-515 to 140�'Avenue Southeast arterial widening
38. 116�'Avenue Southeast-Renton City Limits to South 192°d Street arterial widening
39. 140"'Way Avenue Southeast- SR-169 to Southeast 192°d Street arterial widening
40. Elliott Bridge—Jones Road to SR-169 bridge replacement
41. East Corridor Study—SR-169 to Northeast Fourth Street arterial widening
42. Carr Road/SE 176"'/SE Petrovitsky—Lind Ave. S.W. to 116"'Avenue S.E. arterial improvements
43. Carr Road/Benson Road(SR-515) intersection
improvements
44. 140`�'Avenue SE/SE Petrovitsky intersection
improvements
45. Trans-Valley Corridor—Southcenter Parkway to SR 515 transportation
improvements
46. Benson Road/South 31 St Street intersection
improvements
WSDOT(Limited Access):
47. I-405—I-5 to SR 167 add one lane in each
direction
48. I-405 —SR 167 to North City Limits add two lanes in each
direction
49. SR 167—I-405 to SW 43rd Street add one lane in each
direction
50. I-405/SR 167 Interchange
• Southbound I-405 to Southbound SR 167 construct direct
connection ramp
• Northbound SR 167 to Northbound I-405 construct direct
connection ramp
• Northbound I-405 to Southbound SR 167 construct direct
connection ramp
51. I-405 between Lind Avenue SW and Talbot Road construct one-way
frontage road in each
direction with ramp
connections to I-405 at
Lind and Talbot
XI-25
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
52. I-405/SR 169 Interchange
• SR 169/North 3`d Street construct split-
diamond interchange
• Southbound I-405 to Eastbound SR 169 construct direct
connection ramp
53. I-405/Park Avenue N Interchange reconstruct to
accommodate I-405
widening
54. I-405/N 30�'Street Interchange reconstruct to
accommodate I-405
widening
55. I-405/NE 44�'Street Interchange reconstruct to
accommodate I-405
widening and future
improvements
WSDOT(City ROV�
56. SW 43rd Street—Lind Avenue SW to Talbot Road arterial widening
57. East Valley Road—SW 16�'to SW 34`"Street arterial realignment
58. Lind Avenue SW—Grady Way to SW 16t''Street arterial widening to
accommodate frontage
road and I-405 ramps
59. Talbot Road—South Renton Village Place to South 15�'Place arterial widening to
accommodate frontage
road and I-405 ramps
60. Mill Avenue South—Houser Way to Bronson Way convert to one-way
northbound
61. Renton and Cedar Avenue Overpasses of I-405 realignment/revisions
to accommodate I-405
widening
62. Sunset Boulevard—west of I-405 realignment/revisions
to accommodate I-405
widening
63. Houser Way—north of North 4�'Street realignmendrevisions
to accommodate I-405
widening
64. Lake Washington Boulevard—north of NE 44`t'Street realignment to
accommodate I-405
widening
65. Benson Road/I-40S Overpass replacement to
accommodate I-405
widening
POST 2022 IMPROVEMENTS
RENTON:
South Lake Washington Improvements
• Logan Avenue North—North 4"'Street to Garden Avenue North arterial widening
• North 10�`Street—Logan Avenue North to Houser Way street widening
• North 8�'Street—Logan Avenue North to Garden Avenue North arterial widening
• Park Avenue North—Logan Avenue North to 1,200 feet north of Logan new street
Avenue North
North 4`�'Street—Logan Avenue North to Sunset Boulevard revise street network
XI-26
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
WSDOT(Limited Access):
I-405—I-5 to SR 167 add one lane in each
direction
I-405/SR 167 Interchange
� Northbound SR 167 to Southbound I-405 construct direct
connection ramp
East Valley Road at SW 34�'Street construct new ramps
connecting to SR 167
I-405 at North 10"'Street construct direct
connection ramps to
and from the north
I-405 at SR 169
• Northbound I-405 to Houser Way construct direct
connection ramp
• Southbound Houser Way to Southbound I-405 construct direct
connection ramp
• Northbound SR 169 to Northbound I-405 construct direct
connection ramp
WSDOT(City RO�:
Rainier Avenue—Grady Way to East Valley Road realign roadway to
connect to East Valley
Road at SW 16`i'Street
East Valley Road—SW 16�'to SW 34�'Street arterial widening
xI-27
� � ' � ' � • ' � � • • � •
I 1�
�
� � � � � � � ,
�,��
. =�'
• � ��� � �� �
_�- �
;: '� 1 .. ��
, �f ;���_
s���� �'��� � •
1"`m
. y
.. . � ��� �.�
� � ' ►
�i .��.m��� ���� ,
.- 0 ►�"'3� �`���
_�_�;; �
Illlllli ': ��1�,=.
q i��► �� � �0 � � ����:;
�■�11► ,..
s
�nn� �-�
` �i��iiii[� i�: '• , _ !„�'I�" 0
I��im�u 1��"'� IE; - �� �J�
► ♦�• @ �i�i�E- ������r • �
..
o m ., ,
�'u�i���� I�1��,0 1 I .:\ „���� �
� ► - • .. �• �.
- r�11�'=_=-�=� •. ,� i�• �■t�l��� •
■;_�a--;� . 'p �= .,,_
Y ' �*-� �-�=�:� .` �
�
�� ' �`1°�'i�e•.,,� , �m;� ��� , L�y ..
---r.
► i(D .J1���===�� - � .4 i � .
� \\'1 ,,r ,�►� ' IIE� � ������I` � ��5 �_r+m �O
. �:'���..����1� N11� `�, �I�R�� � ��S �, � � -
� �������`',,�,�L�I.�. ;<.O ������ 0 � •
I . �;
�' 11
_�'� �� 900 ��-�M�i;�:iFiE�7E��►���� •� i i 1 ■
.
��'1�j�'�..I�a-��uu�!►.� � m �
��->_ � � �� ♦ 1
� •• ��[�mn:��I�� ,.I .�
..._„ r ���?. �� 169 ...
� � :,�..,� ' Q��Ji�I�1111 � �_ � ���
" r ��
, ���''��� �" `. ;\� �� �.
��' �
��, �5���1!�ii,� � �� , w��� � E� �
� �
"�—�.�—���1• aos' �4�i� '�i �������� �.:� i.`��o .
� 1�1 `"'���iis-+�
.
�. 1�!' / �.�.r
m m .[� �IFS�;i �, "�:�� }�F a „
5 , o��m���c�.�m�1 �� rs .� �
� � _
�: � ��; �lll �� � ./.� "♦`� � •�
. �sx`y, � � � ' i�/� Q� 1` i
�s� —� �'i� _ .,::.� , � "�`�M
• �� � 0 ��� ..���� � ���;
11 . � �► � m�� � ���\�
: � rt..,: _.�.,.�K m �� ?��
;� �_, f, � �� �� � �
• m m1 m m ��
i , .� :� �
_ �� m , ! �1 �
� �� 4
� . -+ t
�p �9 �
��� Y �� ,c�
� � ��
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Included in Table 1.1 are arterial and freeway improvements that have been identified beyond 2022. These
improvements will also be needed to support future land use and neighborhood and business goals and improve
safety.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include periodic testing of the 2002-2022 arterial and freeway
improvements in Table 1.1 against the LOS standard.
TRANSIT
In the future, fewer new roads will be built to handle increased traffic. The challenge will be to better manage
the existing transportation system and reduce traffic demand by encouraging the use of alternatives to single
occupant vehicles. One of the most important of these alternatives is public transportation, or"transit." The
Renton transit system, defined in this Transit Chapter of the Transportation Element,must provide attractive,
convenient service for the local and regional travel needs of Renton businesses and residents.
Objectives
The Transit Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-B: Encourage the development and use of alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles.
T-C: Ensure that a regional high-capacity transit system serves Renton.
T-D: Develop a transit system that conveniently connects the regional high-capacity transit system and local
Renton residential areas,activity centers,and employment centers to the transit center.
T-E: Develop a local transit system that provides attractive, convenient service for intra-Renton travel.
Policies
Policy T-17. The City should work with other
jurisdictions in the greater metropolitan area to plan Policy T-24. The City should support development
and provide frequent,coordinated and of transit service connecting Renton to a regional
comprehensive bus service and transit facilities in rail network.
all residential and employment areas.
Policy T-25. Criteria should be developed to locate
Policy T-18. Local and regional transit service and park-and-ride lots serving residential areas.
facilities should be planned and improved in
cooperation with the regional transit authority. Policy T-26. Park-and-rides within the City of
Renton's Urban Center and its Center Village
Policy T-19. The City should take an active role in designations should meet the following criteria:
working with the regional transit agencies in • Use structured parking garages.
planning and locating public transit facilities. • Be available for non-commuter use during
evenings and weekends.
Policy T-20. The multi-modal Transit Center in • Be located within the immediate vicinity of
downtown Renton should be promoted as part of a the City's Transit Center, ar any future major
regional high capacity transit system. transit transfer facility(e.g.,in Renton
Highlands or South Lake Washington
Policy T-21.Parking serving the downtown Transit Neighborhood).
Center should be encouraged in parking structures.
Policy T-27. Surface park-and-rides located
Policy T-22. Non-structured park-and-ride outside of the City's Urban Center should meet the
facilities should be located out of the Urban Center following criteria:
and feed into the downtown Transit Center. • Be located in the vicinity of I-405, SR-167,
SR-900 east of I-405, and/or SR-169. (These
Policy T-23. Development of a regional network park-and-ride locations shall be chosen to
using new technology to move people and goods provide convenient access for transit to those
should be supported.
XI-29
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
corridors while minimizing commuter pass- • Not be expanded to accommodate leased park
through traffic on Renton's street system.) and rides.
• Be located in Commercial or Indusfial • Not be leased within the commercial area
designations within easy walking distance of west of the Urban Center—Downtown
employment, and/or multi-family uses. bounded by SW 7�'Street, Shattuck Avenue,
• Not be located within the Rainier Avenue Airport Way, and Hardie Avenue SW since
corridor north of the I-405/SR-167 cash flow resulting from a lease may be a
interchange. disincentive for redevelopment of surface
• Avoid consuming large areas of urban land parking lots in this area.
for primary use parking lots.
Policy T-29. Regional commercial uses should be
Policy T-28. Shared-use park-and-rides located linked by frequent and reliable mass transit to
anywhere within the City should meet the following major employment and population centers.
criteria:
• Be leased from existing,under-utilized
parking spaces required per development
standards for a primary use.
Also see related policies in: TDM/CTR Section; Land Use ElementlUrban Center Section; and Community
Design Element.
The residential and centers policies of the land use plan also support transit through establishment of residential
densities and a mix of residential and commercial uses in centers that can support public transportation.
Specific treatment of the routes and stops for a transit system in downtown Renton are addressed in the
Downtown policies of the land use plan. However, it is expected that such stops would serve commercial
activity centers,which would complement the commercial and residential activities envisioned in the centers
and residential policies of the land use plan.
Eacisting Transit Service
Bus service in Renton is currently provided by the King County Transit Division(Metro),the agency
responsible for transit service in King County, and Sound Transit,the agency responsible for regional transit
service.
Figure 2-1 identifies the bus routes operating in Renton in 2003. A variety of Metro service is provided in the
city ranging from internal Renton routes such as Route 110,the Renton "Rush"circulator route,to regional
service to downtown Seattle and downtown Bellevue. Sound Transit's service includes express routes
operating to SeaTac and Bellevue(Route 560),to Auburn and Bellevue (Route 564)and to Federal Way and
Bellevue (Route 565). While not serving the city directly, Sound Transit's Sounder commuter rail service stops
at the nearby Tukwila station. During weekday peak periods, Sounder trains currently serve several locations in
Pierce County and South King County as well as downtown Seattle(King Street Station).
The following provides an overview of the 2003 transit network serving Renton.
Local Access '
The route structure and service headways for Renton routes provide basic overall service coverage. One of the
local,community-oriented routes,Route 148,provides late evening and Sunday service. Route 105 provides
evening service in the Highlands. Service connections in the Highlands area are reduced in the early evening
periods;however,Route 240 provides evening and weekend service in the Highlands. In addition,Route 110,
which was intended to operate as a local circulator,is available only during the peak periods and includes
service connection to the Tukwila commuter rail station.
XI-30
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Eastside Connections
Several Metro and Sound Transit routes provide connections to downtown Bellevue and other Eastside
communities. These connections include Bellevue(non-downtown)and Factoria. Direct service is currently
provided between Highlands and Factoria via Metro Route 240. Route 140 provides 30-minute service during
the day Monday through Saturday plus hourly service in the evenings.
South King County Connections
The baseline travel demand patterns indicate a substantial level of demand between Kent and various locations
in Renton,particularly the Green River Valley. While several Metro and Sound Transit routes connect Kent
with Renton,the service is focused on the downtown Renton. The Green River Valley area is accessed at the
western edge of this district.
East-West Connections
Metro Route 140 currently connects Burien and Renton. Sound Transit Route 560 provides a connection
between SeaTac and Renton. East-west connections to the Crreen River Valley area are particularly important
given the current level of travel demand to this area from locations such as Tukwila and Burien.
The following routes serve a variety of markets:
• Routes 101 and 106,Downtown • Route 240,Bellevue
• Route 140,Burien • Route 169,Kent
• Route 148,Local Renton
Downtown Renton Transit Center
The Downtown Renton Transit Center is the hub of transit service in Renton. The Transit Center is served by
regional and local service provided by Sound Transit and the King County Transit Division(Metro),and acts as
both a destination and a major transfer center. The Downtown Renton Transit Center is located between South
Second and South Third Streets on Burnett Avenue South and on a new connection between Logan Avenue
South and Burnett Avenue South. The facility has been carefully integrated with other planned developments in
the downtown area.
Custom Bus Service
King County Transit, as of 2003, operated one custom bus route(952) serving Renton. This route operates one
trip in the peak hour in the peak direction serving areas with significant employment density. Renton custom
bus service originates at the Auburn Boeing plant,and serves Kent,Renton and terminates at the Everett Boeing
plant.
Park-and-Ride Facilities
Renton has one dedicated transit park-and-ride lot facility within the city limits: the South Renton Park-and-
Ride lot located at South Grady Way and Shattuck Avenue South. This park-and-ride lot has 370 spaces and is
used at capacity.
There are four park-and-ride lots in the Renton planning area which are leased by King County Transit for
commuter parking. One of the lots is in downtown Renton, at the First Baptist Church at Southwest Sunset
Boulevard and Hardie Avenue Southwest. It has 21 spaces and is used at 19%capacity. Another lot located in
the Renton Highlands at Saint Matthew's Lutheran Church on Northeast 16th Street and Edmonds Avenue
Northeast has 146 spaces and is at 29%capacity. A third lot is located at the East Renton Shopping Center at
Southeast 128th Street and 164th Avenue Southeast, east of the Renton City limits in unincorporated King
County. This lot has 21 spaces and is at 29%capacity. The fourth leased lot,also located in unincorporated
King County,is at the Nativity Lutheran Church at 140th Avenue Southeast and Southeast 177th Street. This
lot has 25 spaces and is at 60%capacity.
XI-31
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
The Boeing Company has an employee-only park-and-ride lot located in the vicinity of North 8th Street and
Garden Avenue North. This lot has a capacity of approximately 100 stalls.
The City has leased 200 parking spaces in the downtown parking garage to King County Metro Transit as a
park and ride facility.
XI-32
��\ � .\�� .`Mtj'�R�� p
'J `�� _,,,n�llF"f�.�5'tt!91�'" �� ,..+e_ [J
� �'n. R1SC�e..-- i .
��� � "�. �?al;(N +G�►�"'y�'tia'`'�\1 �{v✓e'',p .f�"'.��'!�' .
`�'�; !-
� - „�'�� � p"� �a. .
- �S„�,� �� �k��� ,;� ��;,�` r���s+'� �`,;,%4►�-'��.�",��l�s�� � ; : •'' �
. g�, �r
i�' .....d�9' 1�`co`�"�`�,r�,'�i'f�� ��� ,� �� ,!�'-' ;`y��a'�{j '��'e++r , ' � —
' ,- Nb���a`ecY+,�i.� p�,��,�� � � �.��'�';��d�j� rt..""+Y�: u :
�• ___ -- �y �
j. - \s.�.�����~..qF�.Ye� t�' '�", �~ R,.,.,, •
�_. brl,�`,�__._.ti i�'��iXit4�:.�r�� �.�"12 �f ;;1�y !C ���`�� �
♦ ` .-..,++,,,.N��T�1��i� � ��h."�� �eeF�. ;e�! �.. � � �
_� � '„�.-�„� , ��,r�;������*-��:'v_1--► • ,
����� �
a��� V�y�, �#ra �� j��u��� ��1iir *
G dd � pp ���'(t:;��;�,� � i�%t
� s.J' � �����. ���� ��.�""�14`�vy�` �� •
�1�f± � /;�'471 � �p�.��j',Q�+�r��� ��MQW���y� �•�'�4�ky�'� � .
� � �b7{!s�F �`1 � �7��OT� " �a��,y �5���/t� i +
� w S � ��e9 ��i,���A�1l�*
��� fIM� p f S5�' �.,,b f�V .
o�••• �� �"��j►�►A', !'i'ni.."S'■e ! �`� � �.�; � � �
�/� '�'�� '�r�raaat,,, �� ' • �`»�, �.�'�8r."�9� �*�MAtb d;l�'°'` • ;
� _ � ("�' ��*'' . .
Si ..,�"'Y,y��fnwY�!t�, �� �r��w'y,NIs.����P��W�w _.,.6^ • �
Cs ��Rt ,,,•n�'.S�IC����� "";,�.?aII•i�" '�+na:�:«:'"�\���F •
� � ���„�„����'�}j t�����������;:..'`.:2ish d:V�� � •
• � � �-.�, a�:a,��a, �'�`��tyQ.`}� e t�.� Y�=�'-1?�A•;;,-,���� .
���y� � ���"'�A��)j $i#Yj131��{�y''0`."+ � �R.fi� ]IM� �\����., ,
,.��'"'- �� ���,.�.y�p..�+�.. � * �s-"` ��1,��� ,� � + •.����\4�`\`
�.�j'� ��"`M�����'�,�°�'15`�it��'*s+��� � :� "+d�` �"4' �`� ����11� .
� ��t �� �, ,�:��.�r.,�,��,��� 9� �►�,4,-`t�',�7 p�.-a,,,��": �,�'p�/�
( c �� r .... � ,�..�y p
G� i �� l. �C.�`�"��y�U���t7i � �F�.�"`+:tJl(�.k,-��� \p\�� �\\.'� ��;'�\\�� ` \.i"� ' H
�� d.� � r&4'�� �t ��tV' w �r �����t��p� �. \����ty� �` �('��\�\���+`� `�� � \\��
�.- A .y t }°si i"R" � ,/ ♦�.9� \� � � ` «\�� �\\�\��\\\ �� �i �
'l�l� ray�l�w,�o�w:P ° /�� ���':\�:.,:.. 1.:�\�';�^���, ,�.�\�'�'\�\\\' �.\�\`\ ! •
� � �.�,. `�tM' '� �� ..'1� �.�� x:������t�� i�'�•....p„ C�. � `������'����\\�,'��,�•, � �
! yS����� v���w. p � ���:"`. .9 � �:'\\\ \ �\�� ;���
��� �\\ �� • .`���."�1���\`':��
� nR � �da (q+� �� . � �,,.iH ���\ �`�```�\\\��\"�.*4� L � .\ 1 ��-\.���.
� �ii y�p R`7�(l�uaW �i11 ^�m �.t ���� P a . �\:��`.:�`::,'`�a "�!P � R\�\��\1�\\t`..��\�\\\�
�I .r� 'r �. � 1 �� \::� w. \ ♦ �\•.,�:,..\i�t
w ��lY�A3��lF l ,� p rr�:�1i\Z��/�y�:��'�,�•i��\'\ '"npq \���\��.`����;�`::i�..• ::� �
�IIMs +�,� 'p ��" �'' M "\�:� wCY���,�'.C:.:: �rM� 1>�\�l. ��v>.,��t�.v i
t� Q \F•�' , \1\\�� x �\Z ��\�� �
� "'� �M���:dy�a�;� „� ��da ` f�{ ��\»��,�,�,p����a������' �, ����\\�\Z.\�\�\�;i�\;`:
� �'°�Tt7T' ! „cII', t: ��'.� d. ,"�pi �N.t1�`..\�„f..i��"""'��:,t-•-"�/�„'� 1y',..«:\\�.�':.`` � ��..\�,
f! ,�A p•. t��i' �'�ww.k't �\��\� 11`\�� �.jW!^� ����"',\\\` �\���\``�
S✓ /� (��.. a��..� '��� v C ta r`"3'IJ�!'��{" �11� • ��:� �`\\��v.�\\,`�
f �• �,`�Yp��' ��`�\\\\\�\� -p � �r,~.,I"+p t ���`\�`\��\���\�\,�� .
tY±no � !' .w,. �.��� \�\\� R' Y..�6�'�� ��1��.��`�l��
► t�4'«$'�� � '':.\�,.\\\'\\\\\\`.. � � \�'• � \-
�•„��U�+"�vt t� ,` ��`'``�\\\�::`�;` '�"' e �'�'°��.`s,jy�```�\���\.\,.
;', ��'isfir � � �.� ..�l�\���.���,��t'�� a � �'"c`:���\'� �, •
+� � a— ��'.^�,. ( ^s+,r �� .:����\\�.a. ��.�.,
��s�..�'�, ������\�1\\\�\\� "'m .
,�y� �i,�����\\\\\` •
+ � , +� 2�. �\i���2♦
' , �Zl1�1\\\�`\: �:�\•
, ''`, �k�-� 1..�`�:;;;. �
� p'- �' \��:\�;��\\\\\� �y �
� ��'� o,� ��o�����k '�!�l
� ��' ����riic�� I��/�'
� „4".ti�l�'t �'il�1�����
i, ��� � .
'�" ..
•
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Future Regional Accessibility
The long range transit and rideshare service concept for the King County Transit Division(Metro)service area
is described in the Long Range Policy Framework for Public Transportation(adopted October, 1993). The
Framework establishes policies that will guide future planning and development efforts, and it identifies
possible policy implementation strategies. More specific near term transit improvements are outlined in the
King County Transit Division's Six-Year Transit Development Plan for 2002-2007.
On May 31, 1996 the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority(Sound Transit)approved a 10-year plan,
Sound Move,which is illustrated in Figure 2-2: The Ten-Year Regional Transit System Plan. Voters approved
a funding package to implement the plan on November 5, 1996. The approved Sound Transit Plan includes the
following regional improvements: light rail transit,commuter rail transit,HOV expressway development,
regional express bus service, and community connection improvements.
Sound Transit improvements which will directly serve Renton include HOV access improvements, express bus
service, and local connection improvements. In addition, commuter rail running between Seattle and Tacoma
will stop at a station serving Renton and Tukwila, sited adjacent to the Boeing Longacres property. Efficient
transit connections will be provided between the Downtown Renton Transit Center and the Commuter Rail
Station.
Sound Transit provides regional express bus service,with three routes serving Renton. As noted previously,
express routes serve SeaTac,Bellevue,Auburn and Federal Way. To ensure quick access to the Downtown
Renton Transit Center,the Sound Move plan identified direct access HOV ramps on I-405 in the vicinity of
North 8"'Street and needed arterial HOV improvements in Renton to improve transit speed,reliability and
ridership of transit services. Before constructing any arterial HOV improvements, Sound Transit will evaluate
alternative improvements to benefit transit speed,reliability, and access. The City of Renton is coardinating
with Sound Transit to ensure that commensurate transit service and improvements to improve transit speed,
reliability and ridership in Renton will be provided should I-405/HOV direct access ramps not be implemented.
Transit Plan
Transit improvements are needed to provide the facilities and services necessary to support and encourage
increased transit use and provide an alternative to single occupancy vehicle travel. The transit facilities and
services outlined in the Transit Chapter of the Transportation Element are needed to provide adequate access
between the regional transit system and Renton residential and employment areas, and to provide an attractive
transit alternative for travel within Renton.
As described in the previous section, an element of the regional system is the Seattle-Tacoma commuter rail
line. Access to Renton is provided by a station located on the Renton-Tukwila border between Longacres Way
and Strander Boulevard. This station is currently served by local bus transit and will additionally be served by
local, and possibly regional,bus transit,including fast connections to the Downtown Renton Transit Center.
XI-34
CITYOFRENTONTRANSPORTATIONELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
FIGURE 2-2
REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM
Sound Move �
� The Regional Transit System Man
. - � e
, �
• Ev e:t
Muw7ceo .
. 5°ud'
verMt
:
• As Way
Edniotds� r
�' �;',-,°`t .�.v, ', � •
s��i ;:tiw�;:�• MN7
�:'';5_:.u�ti...�'�y:,- .�. y:
},s.'a� r�'^'.ri. :'<�_s'' 4'
,�.w ;�:��: y,��'- �4 w°°a'rv'�
S' M
� Y �
�1 "�A�t 1
�IllOfld
•, �1 ,
�R "
_ Bell e . .
. O
� ,.
� ��
��
.
. -
.. � � �
i � �
i
� , _
. —�— �
.
� � O
Fcdaai � N
�
; � —srt��
. �s.�.o«t,w.
' .�u.tr�w�
r
r Sumnet � .�rw..�wak
• �"°"'��
. ,_,�v-� . � ,(,� Bo,,,Ky Op .a a�
�..��.�n. �� � �r�c�w
Pa,ld„d (/ ��+ra•bv
�- s � / �oekoeeaano�
' RegXOnal'Ilxnsit�
�,� Ti�rnsporta�n �.
+ �lt ,P�
XI-35
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Regional transit services are provided by the previously described Sound Transit express bus service, as well as
by select King County Transit Division(Metro)express bus routes. The local transit system links
neighborhoods and commercial centers with one another as well as to the regional transit system through
connections to the Downtown Renton Transit Center. Local service is provided through a combination of
services,including buses, shuttles, and Dial-a-Ride(DART)service. In addition, interceptor park-and-ride lots
outside of downtown Renton should be developed close to fip origin locations,with transit service feeding the
Transit Center and regional services. Renton has been and will continue to work with these transit agencies to
assure that transit adequately serves Renton's developing residential areas.
An illustration of Renton's 20-year transit plan is provided in Figure 2-3. This figure depicts planned regional
and local improvements, and identifies at a conceptual level potential service types and transit routes. Specific
transit service improvements and facilities identified for the next 6 years, and over the next 20 years to support
Renton's conceptual transit plan,are described in the City of Renton Transit Needs Assessment as well as in the
King County Transit Division's Six-Year Transit Development Plan for 2002-2007 and by the regional Sound
Move program. The Transit Plan comprises a transit system that will serve Renton from 2002 to 2022,as a
regional destination and as a city with commercial and neighborhood centers.
It should also be noted that the exclusive freeway/arterial HOV facilities included in the HOV Chapter are
needed to support and encourage increased transit use by improving transit travel times(by enabling buses to
bypass or avoid the traffic congestion that is forecasted for the Renton and regional road systems).
Level of Service
The City of Renton Level of Service(LOS)policy emphasizes the movement of people,not just vehicles. This
LOS policy is based on a set of multi-modal elements including auto,transit,HOV,non-motorized, and
transportation demand management/commute trip reduction measures.
The LOS standard will be used to evaluate Renton citywide transportation plans. The auto,HOV, and transit
measures will be based on travel time contours and will be the primary indicators for concurrency.
The 2022 LOS standard has been established to greatly increase the competitiveness of transit compared to
SOV travel. Achieving this goal has guided the planning and programming of the elements of the Transit Plan.
Information on development of the transit index of the Level of Service Standard is provided in the City of
Renton Level of Service Documentation. Ongoing transportation planning work will include continued
refinement and updating of the transit index.
XI-36
� 1 ' � ' � � � � � � �� •
I I�
r
� • � . �
�""' � 'fi ' � �t� � •
��f`
[r - , �k�i'-� ,����-�,. e�
� .�� � .�� � � � ; 1 �� .�
,.
� �:� s�.� �� � `r � `
v� -�z� �' � O
� �;� � � 4
v..' S. ��*�� N � �\� .
� � � � f ' � � ���.
, �
� �� '` M ���� �� �;�'��� �i � �.
�� �_�� ���� ��. ,� ��
= � ,��c
,- x �i � • � '�` �,
� �� � . �
��Illlli ` , � � �
1� 1�1� �����''` �:��I- ,
�,��11 � - � 1 � �
. ���i 111� � _ � ����� ,• '�_` ���"��i���7
. ...� 111[ �j r � �,..x� �
���� ����� ����� - ��'- � � o00� �� � �
-111=.�.d'i ���,�.�: _ -��. - ,��� ��� ,�:����,, �
►-...,;�•
�., -- G� - # �M < � �'���: ■�� � ' -
, � ,_ �11�;_.�:_�; _ ,� ,�.�� � ��� _
���.�.. ►��_'� y�►��^'^���:�,s��'
� , �� _
� `i►�'ir� :�C��== , ' .. �.•��. ,�,,_
� �� � t,��� ' uir i ;?��►�;��� ::�:� ��:
�,'���,�....����� .��� `° �n�c�� �'rr' ���,������ �I
j` ` �i��6D.�'''�;�. !� : r a�1�E"�3`.i/�Ir ri,�°.. ���
� '� `� �.�r.'������ :l�ll lll:�� ��� �
;� ���� "N i��'1����" . � .
L9oo ,�.���tr�Cj 1��.:�l.���' �� � 1 1 I ■
�,_ /�� J� �rr, �rs �,-■o�■.1^.. � .
4��'� "i`{!' `��"'7, I
� . ��� �1 ��F'�!uV�-..–.'�: ,bg - t ..
� �Jiii���G l� �' ��
r �
, \ '���'�� � � � ���
6,�
�� _ �
� �.f��. " �•`
�� :. ���_� �, ,���� ���.1��� �� �
R ��!`�5 ���, .— �ll������� � --,�,;:
� -�' ��#1�►.;�,, . .
.� = i�� ��.�� �._
�:����, �.. �,s� :'�.��''�,,r —�� �
_.�t � � �a�����i }u�►`►_�„aa q
5 , � `�►�ti�,���r `' �,� �M
,� , � � ��l
� ,6z : �Ir `,m��, � < -�
,8, - � ! :���i �J. =� .�•�
, _ � '� � � � � �� ► .�i.._ `'�.�;'
�� . �� � • . -•
1 � � ,.
... � �
�, � .• .
�� �� l - .
� �. � .
� s � .
� �r •
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HO�
In the future, fewer new roads will be built to handle increased traffic. A majar challenge of the Renton
Transportation Element will be to better manage the existing transportation system and reduce traffic demand
by encouraging the use of alternatives to single-occupant vehicles. The HOV Chapter addresses this challenge
by focusing on increasing the person-carrying capacity of the system rather than the vehicular capacity.
Objectives
The HOV Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-F: Encourage the development and use of alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles.
T-G: Develop HOV facilities on freeways and arterials to support and encourage ridesharing by enabling
HOVs to bypass or avoid severe traffic congestion on Renton and regional street and highway
networks.
T-H: Provide facilities to support attainment of Commute Trip Reduction and other Growth Management
goals within the City.
Policies
Policy T-30. The City should support completion Policy T-34. The City should establish or should
of a comprehensive system of HOV improvements encourage the establishment of arterial HOV
and programs on state highways and regional system warrants, standards and criteria for usage
arterials that give high-occupancy vehicles a travel (volume,capacity, LOS);physical and geometric
time advantage over single-occupancy vehicles. characteristics; appropriate locations; time-of-day
of operation; HOV facility type.
Policy T-31. The City should continue to promote
measures to increase the use of high occupancy Policy T-35. The City should support a regional
vehicles among employers located within the City. vehicle occupancy monitoring and HOV system
evaluation program that includes elements such as
Policy T-32. A continuous network of arterial a"demonstration managed lanes"project,
HOV facilities (lanes,bypass, etc.) should be electronic tolling or"HOT LANES"concept.
provided on the congested travel corridors in
Renton. (Also see related policies in the TDM/CTR Section
and see King County Countywide Planning
Policy T-33. Arterial HOV facilities should be Policies.)
provided on the local arterial routes in Renton that
provide access to/from the regional highway
system.
Ea�isting HOV Facilities
Freeway HOV facilities are provided on Interstate 405 and SR-167. These include inside(median)HOV
lanes,both northbound and southbound,on I-405 from the I-5 interchange and continuing to the Renton north
city limit and beyond. Two or more persons in a vehicle are allowed to travel in these lanes. These lanes are
in effect 24 hours per day, except when non-HOV use is allowed between 7 pm and 5 am.
Inside HOV lanes,both northbound and southbound, exist on SR-167 between the south Renton city limits
and SR-405. This HOV facility is also designated for 2+occupant vehicles.
An HOV queue jump lane is provided at the following interchange ramps in Renton: the northbound SR-167
to northbound I-405 ramp; the I-405/SR-169 (Maple Valley)northbound and southbound on-ramps; the I-
405/N.E.Park Drive northbound and southbound on-ramps; the I-405/N.E. 30th northbound on-ramp; and,the
I-405/N.E.44"'southbound on-ramp. Each of the queue jump lanes has a 2+designation.
XI-38
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
HOV Plan
HOV facilities on SR-167 and I-405 provide the freeway HOV system through Renton.. Additional regional
HOV facilities(i.e.,on I-5)must be implemented by the State Department of Transportation in order to
provide regional HOV service to the I-405 and SR 167 corridors. To-date HOV lanes have been completed on
I-5 between the Seattle CBD and Puyallup and on SR 167 between 15r''Street NW in Auburn and I-405 in
Renton.
The City has identified arterial HOV corridors based on the policies listed previously. These corridors include
many of the principal arterials through central Renton and state routes throughout the city. The Renton HOV
Plan includes the provision(over the next 20 years(2002 to 2022)of the HOV facilities shown in Figure 3-1.
The Plan includes HOV facilities,in the form of HOV lanes or intersection queue jumps,in the Renton
corridors listed below:
• Rainier Avenue/Airport Way
• SR-169(Maple Valley Highway)
• Park Drive North/N.E. Sunset Boulevard
• SR-515 or Benson Road
• S.W. 27th Street
XI-39
� �� •
.
_ ��
�,t �
�. �ta .�
�` . ��
, ,�,,����� .. ._ . . . . _
�� �������'�.��� . .. . . . . . _ -
�_ �� � .�:��-� -�� .� ..
�iun�, ��"�'= p�::..,,,� » �-"�"'�"..- a�-c:.::.;,,_ � .. '. - . � -
�1��► f 7�� T,{ � ��:_ '1 � �
��1�IU� - s�-.��,- ��' �i�:�:'� �
�,��"�"" •�� � .
��\%11�[�� ' t�� �: �
���'i,nn► �C�''� ������'� � ■�� � � �� . .
: y=:`��� I������__ ����:����.o�t.�,,�i ;�
�'..�r�11�==�=► ����1�����1 �._ • - .:
� : ����?i-� � ; � .�.., � � � , •
� _ . ��`,�, �� � �� -
'IJ'�""_ 4� ��:��r ='''�• f, • .� � - .
���1� m��.�_(I.� �,,�l �1 _
�,, . � =_�J�
' � `�������Ii� �it"�.� iis `��,i��,s t�� ' ,_ ��� •
� ��
�, ����.'.�c�,��`,���� ���+w� � �.•!��y � �1� _
r' �'�i��+�.t �.,! _ e",'� �- � . . w .
� a �1��_..�,���nrii�0�{'I��i •�, il . ■ , .• .� .
. ,- C���..�► �m ��ir* � ` i s i � �I : � •
s .
��,`,������ �I' �19�!�. [ ` -� � � _ ���•• •
�.AIrtQQ.•� \ � � • �.'.
� `, �r 1
1 \ Y �[I�,�, ��p t ��O �I�L1��1IJ� '�.
, . .
I '
�� ,,, ,e�� • . .
�
�,, ����� Ilf r► ,� '
� � � ��� -
✓. ...,.� �• s
� ��, _ ,,,��!�.��it �o`R' !��'�� � •
��` /�.a� �� 1�����',�'��������'f �` �
r ��. ,, iii ��i -�f��//.i ..`:� . ..
I ��� �� (�5,5� ��� }� 6�,
� 5 � �.,���1 ��r �,r� _� ` .,
1 +�I� ` � � ' '
. ,
�
����9� '.�.� ti���� 0 � . .
�j� ,;,fi,i �� � � r � �t . • �� �
�� a i � � •
�^
,'� � „7»��L,�r :•- .
; � -
, � � •
I ��--.� � � � �
�� , �� �� .
. ��.� �� .. . .
�� � ��., .� , � ,�j�� � ��� - �• .
- ri��. . ���� � • • _ �
� Y �'��
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
In addition to arterial HOV improvements, construction of direct access HOV interchange ramps to provide
connections to the I-405 HOV lane system is planned at N.E.44"'Street,N. 8"'Street, and on the SR-167
system at S.W. 27r''Street. These ramps will provide vital HOV access and enable efficient transit movements
in the City to support regional and local transit service consistent with the objectives and policies described in
the Transit Chapter of this Transportation Element.
The HOV Plan also includes a transit corridor in Central Renton: S. 3rdBurnett/Logan/N. 6"'comprise the
northern portion of the corridor and in the southern portion South Grady Way,Rainier Avenue, Lind Avenue,
Hardie Avenue and Main Avenue South are under consideration to complete the corridor. (Other potential
north-south streets south of S.4"'Street,i.e. Shattuck Avenue S.,Burnett Avenue,Williams Avenue and Wells
Avenue are not under consideration as a result of the City's decision,in response to significant public input,to
locate the southern portion of the transit corridor outside of the South Renton residential area.) A north-south
transit corridor is an important element of a transit plan that supports Renton's policies to: 1) encourage local
and regional transit agencies to provide a high level of transit service to the Downtown Renton Transit Center
by improving transit travel time, accessibility and reliability; and,2)provide an attractive and effective
alternative mode of transportation to the single occupant vehicle that contributes to a reduction in traffic
congestion and air pollution in Renton's Urban Center. Also,the Strander Boulevard improvement identified
in the Arterial Plan,Table 1.1,will serve transit vehicles as well as SOV and HOV traffic and is planned for
implementation coordinated with the Renton/Tukwila commuter rail station.
Several of the above HOV/transit improvements have been identified for funding under the regional Sound
Transit plan approved by voters. Under this regional high capacity transit plan,Renton is designated to be
served by the regional express bus system. Sound Transit has evaluated if there are capital facilities that could
be constructed in Renton which would improve reliability and travel time for transit and HOV movement
sufficient to warrant Sound Transit's investment. Sound Transit has identified the Central Renton north-south
transit corridor improvements and HOV direct access interchange improvements at North 8`�'Street as
beneficial capital investments.
The improvements in the Renton HOV Plan, along with improvements in the Arterial Plan and Transit Plan,
provide a multi-modal transportation plan that meets the 20221eve1 of service standard for the projected travel
demand from land use development envisioned by 2022.
HOV improvements in the I-405 corridor that have been identified beyond 2022 are listed below. These
improvements would help to support future land use development. If these improvements were implemented
by 2022 they could help maintain Renton's 20221eve1 of service standard.
I-5/I-405 Interchange
• Northbound I-5 to Northbound I-405 construct direct connection ramp
• Southbound I-405 to Southbound I-5 construct direct connection ramp
• Southbound I-5 to Northbound I-405 construct direct connection ramp
I-405/SR 167 Interchange
• Northbound SR 167 to Southbound I-405 construct direct connection ramp
• Northbound I-405 to Southbound SR 167 construct direct connection ramp
I-405 at Tu�cwila Commuter Rail Station construct half interchange
I-405 at Rainier Avenue construct half interchange
Ongoing transportation planning work will include further analysis of the freeway interchange and arterial
corridor HOV improvements identified in the HOV plan to verify physical, operational and financial needs and
scheduling of implementation. This further study may find that the planned HOV improvements may not be
feasible on one or more of the selected corridors. Therefore,ongoing work will also include the examination
XI-41
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
of addirional arterial corridors for HOV treahnent on an as-needed basis(without over-developing or over-
using this type of transportation facility). Over-development of HOV facilities can lead to under-utilization
and HOV traffic dispersion,rather than consolidation.
Level of Service
As discussed in the Arterial Chapter,the City of Renton LOS policy emphasizes the movement of people,not
just vehicles. This LOS policy is based on a set of multi-modal elements including auto,transit,HOV,non-
motorized, and transportation demand management/commute trip reduction measures.
The LOS standard will be used to evaluate Renton citywide transportation plans. The auto,HOV,and transit
measures of this LOS standard will be based on travel times and distance and will be the primary indicators for
concurrency.
HOV improvements along with transit improvements should show great effectiveness in improving 2022 travel
times and distance. Achieving this goal will guide the planning and programming of the elements of the HOV
Plan.
Further information on how the HOV index of the Level of Service Standard was established is provided in the
City of Renton Level of Service Support Document.
XI-42
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
The non-motorized component of the City's Transportation Plan is designed to enhance the quality of urban life
in Renton,to improve walking and bicycling safety, and to support the pedestrian and bicycle transportation
modes as alternatives to the use of automobiles.
The plan recognizes that non-motorized facilities along roadways and trails may serve multiple functions,
including commuting and recreation. The on-street elements are specified in the City of Renton Comprehensive
Citywide Walkway Program and as described later in this section. Off-street elements of the non-motorized
transportation system are specified by the City of Renton Long Range Parks, Recreation Open Space and Trails
Master Plan described in the Parks Element.
1. Renton's existing transportation system is oriented towards accommodating cars,trucks, and buses
rather than pedestrians or bicycles. The intent of the objectives and policies that follow is to provide
guidelines for reevaluating the existing system and providing a better environment for walking and
bicycling. Overall,pedestrian facilities throughout the City are intended to be upgraded.
2. More facilities are also needed for bicycle storage and parking in shopping areas,employment centers
and in public places.
3. A better pedestrian network can be encouraged by creating an interconnected street system,developed
to street standards,which include adequate walkways and street crossings. Traffic sanctuary islands
and midblock crossings across busy arterials are also useful methods of improving the pedestrian
environment.
Objectives
The Non-Motorized Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-I: Improve the non-motorized transportation system for both internal circulation and linkages to regional
travel.
T-J: Develop and maintain comprehensive trails system which provides non-motorized access throughout
the City,maximizes public access to open space areas,and provides increased recreational
opportunities for the public.
T-K: Integrate Renton's non-motorized transportation needs into a comprehensive transportation system
serving both local and regional users.
T-L: Enhance and improve the non-motorized circulation system to, from, and within the City.
T-M: Develop and designate appropriate pedestrian and bicycle commuter routes along existing minor arterial
and collector arterial corridors.
Policies
Policy T-36. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic Policy T-38. Obstructions and conflicts that
should be accommodated within all areas of the restrict pedestrian movement should be
City. minimized on sidewalks,paths and other
pedestrian areas.
Policy T-37. Pedestrian and bicycle movement
across arterial intersections should be enhanced. Policy T-39. Convenient and safe pedestrian and
bicycle access should be provided to and at the
downtown Transit Center and all transit stops.
XI-43
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy T-40. Bicycle storage facilities and Policy T-42.3. Foot/bicycle separation should be
parking should be encouraged within provided wherever possible; however,where
development projects,in commercial areas and in conflict occurs, foot traffic should be given
parks. preference.
Policy T-41. Streets and pedestrian paths in Policy T-42.4. Adequate separation between
residential neighborhoods should be arranged as non-motorized and motorized traffic should be
an interconnecting network and should connect to provided to ensure safety.
other streets.
Policy T-42.5. The adopted Long Range Parks,
Policy T-42. New pedestrian facilities should be Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan should
compliant with the Americans with Disabilities be coordinated with and be an integral component
Act, and existing facilities should be upgraded to of the City's on-going transportation planning
improve accessibility. activities.
Policy T-42.1. Non-motorized transportation Policy T-42.6. Appropriate mitigation measures
should be developed in tandem with motorized should be taken to address impacts on the City's
transportation systems,recognizing issues such as transportation infrastructure. Contributions to the
safety,user diversity, and experiential diversity. City's non-motorized circulation system will help
alleviate such impacts.
Policy T-42.2. Recognize the diversity of
transportation modes and trip purposes of the
following four groups: pedestrians,bicyclists,
joggers and runners.
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
The City's existing non-motorized transportation system is comprised primarily of roadside sidewalks.
Pedestrians have the exclusive use of sidewalks within business districts and have shared use with cyclists
in other areas of the city.
Although the City Code requires that sidewalks be provided on all streets,many of the public streets were
constructed before the existing code was enacted, and as a result,numerous roadways are currently without
sidewalks. Streets needing sidewalks include both local and arterial roadways. The Ciry of Renton
Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study addresses the sidewalks and walkways within the City. This
report identifies a priority roster to construct"missing" sidewalk/walkway sections throughout the City.
The priority evaluation system is based on four sidewalk users: 1)school children,2)elderly persons, 3)
transit riders,and 4)all other users.
Except within business districts,cyclists may use existing sidewalks,provided that they yield the right-of-
way to pedestrians. As of 2003,Renton has a combined bicycle/pedestrian facility along Garden Avenue
North(North 6`�'Street to North 8`�'Street) and North 8�'Street(Garden Avenue North to Houser Way), and
striped bicycle lanes on Southwest 16`i'Street(Oakesdale Avenue Southwest to Longacres Drive),on
Oakesdale Avenue Southwest(SW 16`�'Street to SW 27`�'Street)on Duvall Avenue NE(NE 4"'Street to NE
8"'Street), and on NE 4`�Street(east of Duvall Avenue NE).
Renton is located at the crossroads of a regional system of existing and proposed trails. Existing trails
within the City include the Cedar River Trail System and a portion of the Lake Washington Loop Trail.
Regional Systems with proposed access to the City include the Green River Trail and the Interurban Trail.
Figure 4-1 shows the existing(2003)non-motorized facilities within Renton and the nearby regional routes.
XI-44
.
� � � � � � • . � , � � . .
i i�
� • •• 'I �
. • . • -. y� ".
�� , � ' '.
;��j .
�. �
, $4� � C .�
.. . y ���� �� �,,
- „
• ,.. _ �.�.
�� I� - 11
� ��■ � 111 ��
;, �:_ �-�� -� �
�., = � � ••��
� � � ��_ �< _�„� �
.�r►\ � � � � . . .
��IIU�i!.�•� � ����� �,� ;, �.,�,�,,;,,�.�II
��1�1►7 � ��►=
�11�► �. � c ��
. `���illll:�;, ; �\ ' } . ,�` %i�.�` �
� �os .:����
' ��(�\�il�[� �d ��.;c �, � !
I�u1�1�111 1���� �, �� �■. �1�"� � �M'�J �
i'�"� r ,,`�, ,R� � � 300
=�fi��� ����Z11�i��m�: �E ,��;;i��i'!�
-, �r�11 -==_-�. = . �i�..; .�, . -
� �� _r;•t��:��A� ���R`�� ��� A �
, �
� — �`'�Y1�== ��m t�� �l�'�.. 1�
---�� �m � �� Y
� /�4 /J1111===f..�- � ') �'�`��r�� ��S _
-
�� \♦�1 !3� _� � ��� 11l1 ��'l'��`���� .. e � ��, ��
����.-��\�i� �:��1 � ���sc � .r15� '�.
�,� �►` =� /.►''lt.�� �' 'i;3�. ��f� o IE _ � i
�.�';��L ��_� , ,n f�; 1 !!� .
� . . � 'I
: �;,°° �.�,,,,��-�.;���.�,��n.� � i� • • � � � :. i �1
�� ��►a���. �._�������• . _
�, ���+�r:,i -����.�•- , � ,� �
" ��lE_1 � ,69 �� � w�
�
: .� !► u � --"'�.:a,,, �r
11 :., ,._ = �j"��� �, �+► �aell �
�' ' , i � ��
, ,
� "� ''—i�ll i t,�;,• '�'v'li ,
�O� .�r ••—
��-
��''°` � 111: �+� �'��"�`'
m �� ��-,���''a_ �.... � - -
�� o �� �
��, ti � �IF�,;� _�""9�� rt�.F
5 � ���..��� ��rs , -
I 1 ��� �
`�iii�- �
tE] ��i �
1 � � � .
A1 � �' ,
-
�1 '! ' _
� 1� -���� '
�'i _ ��`��
"� ,��.a
-; ��� , � -
����__� �
� •� �,. . � � .. - _ _
� ���� '
Y
� �,
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Design criteria for walkways,trails,and bikeways are contained in a variety of documents,including the
City of Renton Municipal Code and Trails Master Plan,King County Road Standards,American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,
and Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(the MUTCD).
Neighborhood and Regional Access
The principal non-motorized facility type linking neighborhoods within Renton and providing regional
access are sidewalks or walkways. These facilities provide safe non-motorized mobility for both
pedestrians and cyclists outside of business districts. Within business districts, sidewalks provide safe
mobility for pedestrians.
Currently,the sidewalks that exist along most of the arterials within the City provide the primary regional
link as well. This "regional" access includes non-contiguous areas within Renton as well as areas outside of
the City planning area. Some notable walkway deficiencies exist along sections of Maple Valley Highway
(SR-169),Puget Drive, and Talbot Road South. These roadways do not currently provide safe non-
motorized mobility through Renton. Installation of walkways/sidewalks has been either programmed into
future transportation improvement projects,or identified in the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide
Walkway Study.
Non-motorized neighborhood connections are made via sidewalks along arterial and collector roadways.
Sidewalk connections between most neighborhoods within the City limits currently exist. In some
locations,however, sidewalks are not continuous along a roadway.
In potential annexation areas that are or were defined as °rural"by King County, sidewalks have generally
not been constructed along either arterial or local roadways,because sidewalks are not required by rural
area design standards. Most existing county roadways have either paved or gravel shoulders for use by
cyclists and pedestrians. Consequently,many of the potential annexation areas do not provide protected
non-motorized inter-neighborhood connection. This is not the case in Fairwood,however,where sidewalks
have been installed throughout the development.
Another important consideration is the bicycle route connection to regional cycling corridors. The regional
corridars,to which the Renton bicycle routes should connect, include the Interurban, Christensen/Green
River,Lake Washington Loop, Sammamish, and Soos Creek Trails.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan
The City,per the Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study,will construct sidewalks/walkways at"missing
locations." In some areas, sidewalks will be constructed along each side of the street. Because of physical
constraints such as side slopes and roadway grades, or minimal expected pedestrian usage, some locations
will have pedestrian/cyclist facilities constructed on only one side of the street. Sidewalk facilities will be
constructed as part of a prioritized installation program. Additional non-motorized facilities will be
constructed in conjunction with roadway improvement projects and as part of the Transit Improvement
Program.
Cunent annexation area roadways without sidewalks will be added to the Comprehensive Citywide
Walkway Study after annexation into the City. Sidewalk improvements on roadways could be improved
through local improvement district(LID) and capital improvement projects (CIP).
Table 4.21ists routes that have been identified as important bicycle transportation elements. Along
roadways designated as bicycle routes,roadway or shoulder widening may accommodate cyclists'needs.
XI-46
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
These improvements could be added when roadway improvement projects are constructed or implemented
as individual improvement projects.
Further review by the City of Renton,in cooperation with citizen groups, will be necessary to determine
which of the projects listed in Table 4.1 are selected for development.
King County is pursuing development of bicycle facilities outside of the Renton city limits. Four routes
leading into Renton have been identified in the King County Non-motorized Plan:
• 116�'Aver�ue Southeast(Edmonds Avenue Southeast)(Southeast Petrovitsky Road to
South 15T Street)
• 140 Place/Avenue So�theast(Southeast 192nd Street to Southeast Renton-Maple Valleay Road)
• State Route 900(138—Avenue Southeast(Duvall Avenue Northeast)to Southeast 82—Street)
• Coal Creek Parkway Southeast(Newcastle City Limits to Renton City Limits)
The routes identified by the City of Renton and listed in Table 4.1 will be planned to connect with these
proposed King County facilities.
The City of Renton Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan identified in the Parks
Element provides an in-depth description of proposed walking,bicycle,and mixed-use trails. By nature,
these types of trails are primarily used for recreational purposes,and are not necessarily supportive of
transportation goals. The creation of these trails would certainly supplement the City's non-motorized
transportation system, and their development by the Parks Department should be encouraged. Routes that
are found to be important transportation elements could be constructed through the transportation program.
XI-47
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
TABLE 4.1
PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES
IFacility Name I Route
Sunset Bypass Route Northeast 17`�Street(Duvall Avenue Northeast to Union Avenue Northeast)
Union Avenue Northeast(Northeast 17`� Street to Northeast 12`� Street)
Northeast 12�' Street or NE 10�'Street(Union Avenue Northeast to Edmonds
Avenue Northeast)
Edmonds Avenue Northeast(Northeast 12��10`�Street to Northeast Park Drive)
Northeast Park Drive(Edmonds Avenue Northeast to Lake Washington
Boulevard North)
� Monroe Avenue Northeast � Monroe Avenue Northeast(Northeast 4�'Street to Northeast 12'�Street)
� Duvall Avenue Northeast � Duvall Avenue Northeast(Northeast 10�'Street to Northeast 24`�Street)
ILake Washington Boulevard I Lake Washington Boulevard(Northeast 44`�Street to Coulon Park) (Partially
(Lk Washington Loop Route) completed)
IGarden Houser Way North(Lake Washington Boulevard to North 8�'Street)
(Lk Washington Loop Route) I Garden Avenue North(North 6�'Street to Bronson Way)
ICentral Renton Connection Garden Avenue/North 6�'Street to Auport Perimeter Road(Various routes
(Lk Washington Loop Route) I under consideration).
� Burnett � Burnett Avenue South(Cedar River Trail to Southwest 7`�Street)
IAirport Anport Perimeter Road corridor(Logan Avenue North to Rainier Avenue)
(Lk Washington Loop Route) Rainier Avenue North(Airport Perimeter Road to Northwest 3`d Street)
I Hardie/Rainier Bypass I Northwest 3`d(Rainier Avenue North to Hardie Avenue Northwest)
Hardie Avenue(Northwest 3`d Street to Southwest 7�'Street)
� Southwest 7`�' � Southwest 7`�Street(Bumett to Oakesdale)
I Southwest 16�' I Lind Avenue Southwest(Southwest 7�'Street to Southwest 16`�Street)
Southwest 16`�Street(Lind Avenue Southwest to Raymond Avenue Southwest)
Southeast Area Main Avenue(Bronson Way to Benson Road South)
Benson Road South(Main Avenue South to Southeast 168`�Street)
Puget Drive Southeast(Benson Road South to Edmonds Avenue Southeast)
Edmonds Avenue Southeast(Puget Drive Southeast to South 157�'Street)
IStrander Boulevard/Southwest Springbrook Wetlands Trail to Interurban Trail
27`�Street
� Sunset Boulevard(West) � Hardie Avenue Southwest to West City Limits
� Talbot Road � South 7`�Street to South City Limits
� Northeast 3`d/Northeast 4`�Street � Sunset Boulevard North to East City Limits ,
XI-48
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT/
COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION (TDM/CTR)
As stated in the Arterial,Transit, and HOV Chapters,a major challenge of the Renton Transportation Plan will
be to better manage the existing transportation system and reduce traffic demand by encouraging the use of
alternatives to single occupant vehicles. The Transportation Demand Management/Commute Trip Reduction
(TDNUCTR)Chapter addresses this challenge by focusing on encouraging and facilitating reductions in trip-
making,dispersion of peak period travel demand throughout the day,increased transit usage, and increased ride
sharing.
In enacting the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)law of 1991, and the 1997 amendments,the
State Legislature found that decreasing the demand for vehicle trips is significantly less costly and at least as
effective in reducing traffic congestion and its impacts as constructing new transportation facilities, such as
roads and bridges,to accommodate increased traffic volumes. The legislature further found that reducing the
number of commute trips to work made via single occupant cars and light trucks is an effective way of reducing
automobile-related air pollution,traffic congestion and energy use. The goals, objectives, and policies of the
Transportation Demand Management/Commute Trip Reduction Chapter also are based on these findings.
Objectives
The Transportation Demand Management/Commute Trip Reduction Chapter is based on the following
objectives:
T-N: Encourage the development and use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicles.
T-O: Promote a reasonable balance between parking supply and parking demand.
Policies
This Chapter of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains City policies concerning
Transportation Demand Management and Commute Trip Reduction(including support for ride sharing and
management of parking supply).
Policy T-43. The disruptive impacts of traffic Policy T-47. The construction of parking
related to centers and employment areas should be structures in downtown Renton should be
reduced. (In this context, disruptive impacts are encouraged.
primarily traffic. They could be mitigated through
techniques such as transportation management Policy T-48. Parking ratios should be reduced as
programs implemented through cooperative transit services are increased and an adequate level
agreements at the work place, flexible work hours, of public transit can be demonstrated.
and subarea planning.)
Policy T-49. Transportation demand management
Policy T-44. Appropriate parking ratios should be measures should be implemented at residential and
developed that take into account existing parking retail developments, as well as at the workplace.
supply, land use intensity, and transit and ride-
sharing goals. Policy T-50. Employers affected by Commute
Trip Reduction laws should be encouraged to
Policy T-45. Alternatives to on-street or on-site implement measures that support reductions in
parking should be explored. SOV travel and vehicle miles traveled.
Policy T-46. Site selection criteria should be
developed for location of park-and-ride lots
serving residential areas.
XI-49
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policy T-51. Site design and layout for all types Strategy T-51.1 Downtown(Central Business
of development should incorporate transportation District)parking restrictions and/or removal
demand management measures such as convenient resulting from TDM/CTR policies shall apply to
priority parking places for HOVs, and convenient, commuter/employee parking,not to business
direct pedestrian access from residential, patron/customer parking.
commercial,and other facilities to transit
stops/stations.
Also see related policies in the HOV section.
Ea�isting Parking Supply and Demand
An inventory of the existing parking supply in the Downtown Core was conducted in 2001. The inventory
gathered data for both on-street and off-street spaces. Figure 5.1 summarizes the results of the inventory. The
Downtown Core has 2,055 off-street spaces. There are also 387 public off-street parking spaces within the
Downtown Core. The remaining off-street parking spaces are private or signed for use by patrons of a
specific business. Additional information on this parking inventory is provided in the Parking in Renton's
Downtown Core report.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include expanding the parking study area,possibly citywide,if
needed for the refinement of parking policies and guidelines.
xi-5o
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
FIGURE 5-1
DOWNTOWN CORE EXISTING PARKING SUMMARY 2001
- � � v � - - - � �
^� V
♦ � .
`
�� `��
♦ �
Airport Nay / ��` �N 2 id
I +8� � �� �
j27 + 13 Q��,` 'sf
i +�� ��`� _
obin Ave S �. 140 ��' �� �f\
- i +�� - - �
� 151 \ `�� � �
l � �� �
�
1 ,� � �
' n � ,
13� v' > 1:'2 ; 124 r" .— �♦
�+� � a�3 ¢ + � 1
30 > �
j47 � -+14 � �165 � �� � � �+20 �
c.�.w j � 79 m� _ � � +12 � ��
�v�� -� - . -. 78 . �.p 1
. '
r----�-_� 5 2n�. St`. �� 8 � —
i . •• : _ ' : _ - - - ., . - -�._
� - � " � • . i�
.�1 �� 2 -�. , - 8 a
� +10 +8 + � � + � e .
211 108 2 1 9 1 G d 8 . I�
�i ! .. � I
� �----1 �. � 3rd Sl p 1
��^' �� � � � 2� - t <
�. --'� � 5 . 20 � 118
( .�� 51 � � +3
� i .�� 5 +21� o�s°t 1'6 121 �
� 72 � ���� /
i . / +2T 1�T �
—� Q 52 � <
S 4lh Si(__ _ `_ - -----� ::�
� n ^ ^� � ^►���-��---�- �
Downtown Core Existing --- .��
Paricing �ummary 2001 zoss orrsc�P�
DY r�w F�M'd�MM W rr�
...r..-..-Kw�.-.........-.. +387 OnSfreet Padcirx� ..,...�................
�� .w..aw.w.w..ww��+�w
24�2 Total Parldng SpdCes rK w.w.��+.•rw.�-.
r YrY rwwlw�i�a
XI-51
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Parking Policy Review
As stated in the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)law of 1991,there exists a close
relationship between commuter behavior and the supply and cost of parking. As required by the CTR law,the
City has completed a review of local parking policies and ordinances as they relate to employers and major
worksites and revisions necessary to comply with commute trip reduction goals and guidelines.
Maximum parking ratios have been established, and the existing minimums modi�ed in the City's
Development Regulations,to create a range of appropriate allowable parking ratios. Additional revisions
have been made to support HOV,transit,and non-motorized usage and access.
Employers' Mode Split
The Washington State Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)Law requires employers deemed to be affected by the
CTR Law to have transportation programs for their employees designed to meet goals for reduction of single
occupancy vehicle commuter trips and/or reduction of vehicle miles traveled. CTR-affected employers shall
have two(2)years to meet the first CTR goal of fifteen percent(15%); four(4)years to meet the second goal
of twenty percent(20%); six(6)years to meet the third goal of twenty-five percent(25%); and twelve(12)
years to meet the fourth goal of thirty-five percent(35%) from the time they are deemed a CTR-affected
worksite and begin their program.
Employers'mode split will be addressed with data being gathered and used for the implementation of the
CTR law. In order to implement the state Commute Trip Reduction law,King County was divided into
approximately a dozen CTR zones with similar employment density,population density, level of transit
service,parking availability, and access to High Occupancy Vehicle facilities. The Puget Sound Regional
Council produced base year values for 1992 for each zone using its regional transportation model. These
values reflect the average rate of single occupant vehicle(SOV)trips for all employers in the zones.
Most of the City of Renton is located in the South King County zone. A small piece of the City, the
northernmost tip,north of May Creek, is located in the East King County zone. The base year value for
single occupant vehicle trips for both the South and the East King County zone is 85%. While this figure is
not an exact mode split figure, it is representative of the degree to which employees of all employers in
Renton are accessing their worksites by single occupant vehicle or using other modes. The assumption is
made that the SOV rate is 85%, and the rate of fips made by other modes is 15%.
TDM/CTR Programs
The City has adopted a CTR Ordinance and a CTR Plan(February 1993). The ordinance outlines the
manner in which and the schedule with which employers located within the City of Renton are required to
design and implement commute trip reduction programs at their worksites.
The CTR Plan is a summary document that describes the City's implementation approach. As stated in the
Plan,the City has contracted with Metro to perform certain activities,including employer notification,
employer assistance,and program review. The Plan summarizes the CTR goals and establishes the CTR
zones mentioned above. It explains the circumstances and procedures for employer appeals of CTR
program administrative decisions. The Plan also states the City's commitment to implementing a CTR
program for its own employees,to complete the parking policy review mentioned above, and to report on an
annual basis to the state regarding progress towards meeting CTR goals.
In the past,the City,with the support of Metro,has developed Transportation Management Programs
(TMPs)for new residential,commercial,and office developments. These TMPs have usually been put in
place through SEPA agreements. At some point in the future,the City may consider adopting a developer-
based Transportation Demand Management ordinance(with site design and other requirements)to
complement the employer-based CTR ordinance and its employer worksite requirements.
xI-52
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Parking Management Regulations
Parking regulations are specified in Section 4-4-080 of the Renton Municipal Code. The regulations
include requirements for new construction of parking including landscaping, screening, layout,paving,
markings, and wheel stops. They also include requirements for size and amount of parking according to the
land use activity involved.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include refinement of criteria for locating park and ride lots
serving residential areas to address factors such as the intensity of development in adjacent areas,the level
of traffic congestion in the areas,proximity to arterial streets, and opporiunities to buffer lots from living
areas. Also, standards for construction of parking garages will be reviewed to address minimization of land
area and the amount of impervious surface.
AIRPORT
Renton's Airport is more than a transportation facility. It is also a vital element to Renton's commercial and
industrial economy,providing aircraft services,manufacturing support, flight training, and other airport
activities. The Airport Chapter of the Renton Transportation Element is implemented by the 2002 Airport
Business Plan and the Airport Master Plan for the Renton Municipal Airport.
The intent of the objectives and policies is to support increased aviation activities and appropriate
mitigation of adverse impacts when possible. (See also the Airport Compatible Land Use section of the
Land Use Element.)
Objectives
The Airport Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-P: Promote and develop local air transportation facilities in a responsible and efficient manner and
recognize the Renton Municipal Airport as a unique,valuable,and long-standing public
transportation facility within the region.
T-Q: Maximize available space on the airport site for uses that require direct access to talciways and
runways such as storage and parking of aircraft and aircraft maintenance and service facilities.
T-R: Continue operation of the Airport as a Landing Rights Airport,ultimately providing permanent
inspection facilities to the U.S. Customs Service.
Policies
Policy T-52. Support the land base and seaplane Policy T-54. Lease airport property for aviation-
base activities. Acknowledge that there are related uses that create jobs and expand the City's
certain costs to the community associated with tax base.
the existence of the Renton Municipal Airport, policy T-55. The Renton Municipal Airport
such as noise generation,but recognize that these provides the only publicly-owned seaplane
costs have historically been accepted by the facility in the area and,therefore,the northern
community in exchange for the economic and shoreline of the airport should be restricted to
transportation-related benefits and the civic seaplane access.
prestige that are also associated with the airport.
Policy T-53. Promote and develop airport Policy T-56. Develop appropriate land use plans
facilities and services for all wheeled and float- and regulations for structures and vegetation
equipped aircraft, owners,pilots,and passengers Within the airport's runway approach zone. (See
in a manner that maximizes safety, efficiency, Airport section of the Land Use Element,
and opportunity for use. Objectives LU-E,LU-F, LU-G and Policies LU-
19—LU-30.)
XI-53
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Airport Facilities
The Renton Municipal Airport is a major general aviation airport in the Puget Sound area. The Renton
Municipal Airport is formally designated as a Reliever Airport in the Federal Aviation Administration's
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems and the Puget Sound Regional Council's Regional Airport
System Plan.
The airport is owned by the City of Renton and is located in the northwest corner of the city,bounded
generally on the east by the Cedar River,on the west by Rainier Avenue North, on the south by Airport
Way,and on the north by Lake Washington(see Figure 1.1). The Airport consists of approximately 165.46
acres. It is oblong in shape,and has one runway with two parallel taxiways with concrete and blacktop
surfaces and surface water drainage.
The runway,running southeast to northwest,is 5,379 feet long and 200 feet wide,with a 340-foot displaced
threshold at the south end. It is equipped with medium intensity runway lighting,runway end identification
lighting(REIL),and precision approach path indicators(PAPn. Taxiways are lighted, and there is a
rotating beacon,a windsock, and a non-directional radio beacon. The Federal Aviation Administration
operates a contracted Air Traffic Control Tower during the hours of 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.May 1 through
September 30 and from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. October 1 through Apri130.
Approximately 115,000 landings and take-offs per year take place at the Airport,making it the seventh
busiest airport in the State of Washington. Contiguous to the Renton Airport is the Will Rogers-Wiley Post
Memorial Seaplane Base. Landings and take-offs from the water are not recorded,but during the summer
months the seaplane base is one of the busiest in the Northwest.
Airport Activities
The Renton Airport serves general aviation demand generated by Renton, as well as by other communities
generally within a 30-minute driving time(e.g.Bellevue to the north,Issaquah to the east,Kent to the south,
and Seattle to the northwest). The concept of"general aviation" includes all aviation uses except scheduled
commercial passenger airline servicesand military operations. Consequently,nearly all of the aviation
operations at Renton Airport are those of general aviation,including the flights of the transport-class
aircraft produced by the adjacent Boeing plant. General aviation uses are both personal and revenue-
producing,the latter category including business,charter, and flight instruction.
The seaplane base provides facilities only for small general aviation types of aircraft(both personal and
revenue-producing).
Aircraft services available at the Airport include aircraft maintenance and service, fuel, flight instruction,
aircraft charter and rental,and aircraft storage,both hangared and open. Fixed base operators(FBO's),
which are aviation-oriented businesses offering a variety of services and products to aircraft owners and
operators,provide these services to the aviation public.
Airport Master Plan and Renton Municipal Airport Business Plan
1997 Airnort Master Plan Update
A 1997 update to the original 1978 Master Plan was approved by the City Council in August 1997. A
primary purpose of the 1997 update was to determine the existing and future role of the airport and to
provide the City with information and direction in the future planning and continued development of the
XI-54
ORDINANCE NO. 5099
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Rev.11-01-04
airport. The objective of the study was to develop a plan for providing the necessary facilities to best
accommodate the aviation needs of the airport and contiguous seaplane base over the next twenty years.
The study work scope consisted of inventories, forecasts of aviation demand, demandlcapacity analyses,
facility requirements, airport layout plans and land use plans, development staging and costs, financial
plans, and an environmental impact assessment report. The Airport Master Plan is updated as necessary to
reflect progress and changes from the original Master Plan.
The 1997 Airport Master Plan should be updated in 2005 or 2006 as many of the recommendations from the
1997 Airport Master Plan have been implemented. The remaining recommendations should be re-evaluated
in the next update of the Airport Master Plan as conditions have changed.
2002 Renton Municipal Airport Business Plan
The 2002 Renton Municipal Airport Business Plan was prepared at the direction of the Renton City
Council. The purpose of the plan was to review business potential for the Airport and develop a plan for the
management and operation of the Airport, given the needs of aviation and the neighborhoods surrounding
the airport.
The Airport Business Plan reaffirmed Renton's commitment to strong management and operation of the
Renton Municipal Airport. The recommendations reaffirmed the mix of uses presently at the Airport while
supporting increased efforts to curb aircraft noise.
Implementation of the Airport Master Plan
The airport development and financial plan portions of the Master Plan identify the capital improvements
that should be accomplished, specify when these improvements should be accomplished,and determine the
economic feasibility of accomplishing the programmed improvements and developments. T'he schedule of
developments and improvements is established in five-year increments,to coincide with the five-, 10-and
20-year projections of the Master Plan.
Based upon the five-year schedule of improvements and developments,Federal Aviation Administration
Airport Improvement Program Funds are requested for assistance with the accomplishment of those eligible
projects programmed in the Master Plan.
FREIGHT
The Freight Chapter of the Transportation Element addresses the needs and impacts of goods movement
and distribution in Renton. The Freight Chapter focuses on the two primary providers of freight
transportation: trucking and freight rail.
Objectives
The Freight Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-S: Maintain existing freight rail service to Renton commercial and industrial sites.
T-T: Maintain truck access between Renton industrial areas and the regional highway system.
T-U: Minimize the impact of truck traffic on general traffic circulation and on Renton neighborhoods.
XI-55
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Policies
Policy T-57. Heavy through truck traffic should Policy T-60. Strategies to minimize adverse
be limited to designated truck routes in order to impacts of railroad operations on adjacent
reduce its disruptive impacts. (In this context, residential property should be supported.
"disruptive impacts"refers to nuisances, policy T-61. Support railroad crossing
particularly noise and parking,associated with improvements that minimize maintenance and
heavy trucks. In addition,the intent of the protect the street surface.
policies is to minimize the physical impact of
heavy trucks on city streets.) Policy T-62. Where warranted,provide
Policy T-58. Transportation facilities should be protective devices, such as barriers and warning
designed to complement railroads. signals, on at-grade crossings.
Policy T-59. Spur tracks should be located to Policy T-63. The City should continue to work
provide a minimum number of street crossings With local,regional, state and federal agencies to
and serve a maximum number of sites. address regional freight needs and to mitigate
local impacts.
Truck Routes
The City has a system of truck routes(see Figure 7-1). Until October 1991,the system had been
informal,comprising only advisory signs on the routes. With the City Council adoption of the Truck
Route Ordinance,the truck route system became a regulatory system. Trucks weighing over 26,000
pounds gross vehicle weight are restricted to operating on one of the designated truck routes. Trucks
needing to make deliveries off of the designated truck routes are required to take the most direct arterial
route to/from one of the designated truck routes. When more than one delivery off the designated truck
routes can be combined to limit multiple intrusions into residential neighborhoods, a truck driver has an
obligation to combine those trips. The truck route ordinance does not apply to the operation of Renton
School District buses on designated routes,public transit on designated routes, garbage trucks, city
maintenance vehicles, or emergency vehicles.
XI-56
- -
� � � • � � � � � - � � • • . .
i i•
. . �
�__;y:
.� � ', ,
. �j` �'��' �� � C ,�
,• ��� t•' . �
•• •
�,.
. �� � �.�
.
. .
_
. . . 11
�� �= 111 ��'
. .� �,
�-= �-= �
,,= 3 `�rtb .
..u�� , � �
1�11111�. ;;."'�' ', � .
,
1� ���► � e �1��1 :"' �_ �►��1`�'►��
�■�II► - � � ��
���_��iiiil. ���� �� '��-` � ���..
� ■■���n�r� � aos � � ��R-•�;;1�=
I���r.u�n 1.• � �. lE��II��� ■w�;�
IYu�+- ►���:��► ��� � �
=.�.�� �,���:.�.�� _ � ,.��l��i��� ����. �
--�� �
�� ����p
`!i_ �����:;�=l;� __ ,i �''��z.��� ���_ ' ' —
� ��,���"�� _�� �'^�Y� �� �� ��
� �ix
�1����---� - � Y
_. ,�� � �
----�� " �.. rr .
�
\ ltD �����_==��, � �',�,���� ' ��5
���'���■� ,�� ii7 �nn� `:�,�'���►� = _ - �?
� ..��\' il,� � ,ll9C�� �,,,�► , � '�
f, ��v����`�� '�;, � ����:���~�f�.l�'� ■ -_� _
.. �� , . �
- .��._,:_—��,,•.,,.•% � � i�i .
, -� �son w,�,l��1I�M�j�]Ei"�����`�' t! o • ( { � �-' � ,1 ■ .
� �'� ��3��)�D!1�"7F���� -�-� `:� �
l> ������ '��.��, ��I � 1
� l.`� :,�, . �j +�:)i:,i ,69 _.,.,.�.+ � �►II�I�IE
11 `' ��' � � �
_ �, �..
� - �_�' ,;;� � �` ;` � ��♦ �
� , �
��, � �� :•,:.�l� �,�► ,?, �� �
� �t,.�05= 111i.d � �x��l��'��� �' -..:.
`J �/�,
'�" :�'' �/: ��'[f=''ii�.� ��
��� �'�''
��51;� _�""'���� �I�F��,� �
_ �.����,.�II���rs '�� �,
_ � �•� �
� ,�, ��� `llll��� ..- � •r
. �:, � , � r � �„ti
,8, - ��� �`y�;.
� �,,
���! � ;����'�
,; �. ` i �� ?�� �:.,►�II �
• j� �� E
` I� `' � .. .��
:�� �� �i � ��
, � � -+ [�
� ���
,���.�:f Y �
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Inventory of Local Rail System Facilities and Users
The Freight Chapter of the Transportation Element recognizes the importance of maintaining rail
transportation,which supports industrial and commercial land uses,and provides one component of a
multi-modal transportation system. The Freight Chapter also provides guidelines to ensure that existing
rail lines do not impact adjacent land uses, create maintenance problems for City streets or pose safety
concerns.
Freight rail service is currently available to several industrial and commercial areas of the City. Existing
rail lines bordering the City of Renton include the Union Pacific (iJPRR)and Burlington Northern Santa
Fe Railroad(BNSF)main line tracks between Seattle and Tacoma. Within the City of Renton,the BNSF
18th Subdivision Branch Line connects Renton and the east side of Lake Washington to the BNSF inain
line.
The BNSF inain line runs in a north-south direction and is located along the City of Renton's western city
limits,separating Renton from the City of Tukwila. The BNSF inain line is double-track, and carries a
considerable volume of freight service,as well as passenger service provided by Amtrak under a trackage
rights agreement. Only freight service is provided to the City of Renton from the BNSF inain line. A
single spur track with several branch lines serves the Renton Valley industrial area(southwest Renton).
Another single spur track from the BNSF inain line serves the Container Corporation of America plant,
located north of I-405 in the Earlington industrial area. Use of thgse spur lines is intermittent,usually on
an as-needed basis with no particular set time or frequency.
Commuter rail trains use the BNSF inain line,with a stop at the new Renton/Tukwila(Longacres) station
located just south of I-405. The commuter rail service is an element of the Regional Transit Plan(Sound
Move), approved by voters in 1996. The commuter rail service began in 2001. Three trains currently
provide one-way service between Tacoma and Seattle during the weekday AM peak period and between
Seattle and Tacoma in the weekday PM peak period,with stops at the Renton/Tukwila station.
The BNSF 18"'Subdivision Branch Line splits from the BNSF inain line at the Black River Junction, and
continues easterly through downtown Renton and then northerly through the North Renton industrial area.
The line continues north along the east side of Lake Washington,and connects back with the BNSF inain
line in Snohomish County. Freight service on this branch line is provided by two trains per day(one in
each direction). Passenger excursions are made on this branch line by the Spirit of Washington Dinner
Train,which makes one round trip on weekdays and two round trips on weekends between downtown
Renton and Woodinville at the north end of Lake Washington. Three spur tracks off of the branch line
provide freight service to the Earlington industrial area in west central Renton. Two spur tracks serve the
North Renton industrial area north of downtown Renton. Freight service can occur at any time during the
day. The Spirit of Washington Dinner Train leaves downtown Renton at 6:00 p.m. and returns by 10:00
p.m. with an additional afternoon run on weekends.
The infrequent use of the BNSF inain line spur tracks and the BNSF branch line results in minimal
disruption to vehicular traffic movement in Renton.
The UPRR mainline track, located 200 to 300 feet west of the BNSF inainline and Renton's City limits,
also runs in a north-south direction. The UPRR mainline is a single track, carrying a somewhat lower
level of freight-only service.
XI-58
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Regional Accessibility
Trucks and Industrial Traffic
Truck access from City of Renton industrial areas to the regional highway/freeway system has the option
of several alternative designated truck routes(see Figure 7-1). The dalley industrial area(southwest
Renton)is directly connected to the regional system via the S.W.43–StreebSR-167 (Valley Freeway)
interchange and the SR-181 (West Valley Highway)/I-405 interchange. The Earlington industrial area in
west central Renton is served by designated truck routes on Rainier Avenue and Grady Way,which
provide direct access to SR-167 and to I-405 (via the SR-181/I-405 and SR-167/I-405 interchanges).
Truck access to the North Renton industrial area(north of downtown Renton and west of I-405) from I-
405 is provided via the designated truck route on Park Avenue North. Another truck route to I-405 and
SR-167 from the North Renton industrial area is via North 6"'Street,Airport Way, and Rainier Avenue.
Truck and industrial traffic access from I-405 to the King County waste transfer station and maintenance
shops east of I-405 is provided via the Sunset and Maple Valley(SR-169) interchanges and N.E. 3rd
Street-N.E.4�'Street. The Stoneway Sand and Gravel complex,west of I-405, generates industrial traffic
that uses the North Park Avenue on-ramp to access I-405. Arterial improvement projects in the
Transportation Plan will enhance truck access between the industrial areas and the regional
highway/freeway system.
Freight and Passen�er Rail Use
Future land use development is not anticipated to result in a significant increase in rail freight service in
Renton. Future plans call for additional commuter rail trains using the BNSF inain line, stopping at the
Renton/Tukwila(Longacres) station.
Freight Action Strate�v(FASTI Corridor
The Freight Action Strategy(FAST)corridor, and the projects which comprise FAST, evolved over
several years. Beginning in 1994,the Freight Mobility Roundabout—a jointly-sponsored effort of the
Puget Sound Regional Council and the public/private Economic Development Council of Seattle and
King County—made a sustained commitment to freight mobility within and through the northwest
gateway region,which ties the regional(and national)economy to the Pacific Rim. Roundabout
participants include shippers and carriers representing all freight mobility modes: marine,rail,truck, air,
and intermodal. Other participants are public agencies at all levels: local governments(including the
City of Renton),the three ports of Seattle,Tacoma and Everett,WSDOT and the State Transportation
Commission,and federal agencies(FHWA,FTA). Late in 1994 the United States Department of
Transportation together with the Roundabout,the WSDOT, and the Puget Sound Regional Council
established FAST Corridor.
FAST Corridor is a collection of complementary grade separation and port access projects within the
Everett-Seattle-Tacoma area of Washington State. Collectively,these projects will enhance the
movement of freight within and through the region. Key points of the FAST Corridor projects include:
• Between Everett in the north and Tacoma in the south, focus on the region's north-south rail routes
and port access routes.
• Helping to improve the state and region's transportation capacity to better meet the needs for
freight and goods movements.
• Implementation of a series of grade separation and port access improvements, along with some
corollary improvements. These improvements will complement other freight and passenger rail
improvements in the region,regional ITS efforts,and other planned highway improvements.
XI-59
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.I 1-01-04
• Continuation of the FAST Corridor Partnership,which has been functioning since 1995 and is
working on determining appropriate project level solutions to regional freight mobility issues.
Local freight improvement projects identified at this time include additional rail lines for both the BNSF
and UPRR lines. BNSF has plans to add a third and a fourth track to its mainline along the western edge
of the City. UPRR also has plans to add a third additional track to its mainline that runs parallel to and is
in close proximity to the BNSF inainline. A grade separation of the BNSF and UPRR mainlines at South
180`�'Street in Tukwila(S.W. 43rd Street in Renton)was completed in 2003. These improvements are a
constructive first step toward improving rail freight travel along the western boundary of the City of
Renton and associated freight rail travel passing through Renton.
The Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board(FMSIB):
• develops and maintains a comprehensive and coordinated state program to facilitate freight
movement between and among local,national and international markets;
• works to find solutions that lessen the impact of the movement of freight on local communities;
• proposes policies,projects,corridors, and funding to the state legislature to promote strategic
investments in a statewide freight mobility transportation system; and
• proposes projects that lessen the impact of freight movement on local communities.
In 2003,the FMSIB selected the SW 27`�'/Strander Boulevard project to receive $4,000,000. It is
anticipated these funds will be programmed by 2006.
FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION
The Financing and Implementation Chapter outlines the strategies and actions to finance and implement
the transportation improvements and programs planned as part of the City of Renton's transportation plan.
Renton will meet transportation needs through arterial,transit,high occupancy vehicle,non-motorized
improvements, travel demand management programs, and airport,truck and rail plans as outlined in
previous discussion of the transportation plan. The Financing and Implementation Chapter includes:
• Goals, objectives and policies relating to financing and implementation of the
transportation plan.
• Information on current revenue sources and future revenues.
• Assessment of Renton's 20-year transportation needs and funding capability.
• Assessment of Renton's Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)with regard
to transportation improvements and programs identified in this document.
• Strategies and actions for financing and implementing the transportation plan over the next
20 years.
• Identifying future ongoing work needed to finance and implement the transportation plan.
Objectives
The Financing and Implementation Chapter is based on the following objectives:
T-V: Pursue adequate funding for transportation improvements from all potential sources in an
efficient and equitable manner.
XI-60
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
T-W: Develop a staging and implementation plan that expedites transportation system improvement
projects that i) improve HOV flow,ii)improve transit service, iii)improve pedestrian and bicycle
facilities and iv)provide neighborhood protection against the impacts of through traffic.
Policies
Policy T-64. To support economic Policy T-67. Establish a mechanism to provide
development, growth related traffic multi jurisdictional cooperation to fund
improvements should be funded by a transportation improvements. This could
combination of impact fees charged to new include establishing joint and/or coordinated
development and business license fees. transportation mitigation systems with other
jurisdictions.
Policy T-65. Coordinate equitable
public/private partnerships to help pay for Policy T-68. Create a funding mechanism that
transportation improvements. can be applied across boundaries to address the
impact of growth outside the city limits on the
Policy T-66. Pursue federal, state and local City's transportation system.
sources of funding(e.g. loans,matching funds)
for transportation improvements.
Transportation Program Costs
To determine transportation financing needs,a twenty-year(2002 to 2022)program(including arterial,
HOV,transit and non-motorized components identified previously in this document)was established, and a
planning level cost estimate prepared. Also included as an element of the 20-year funding needs are annual
transportation programs that include: transportation system rehabilitation and maintenance; traffic
operations and safety projects and programs; Transportation Demand Management/Commute Trip
Reduction programs;neighborhood livability projects and programs; and,ongoing project development.
These annual programs support and supplement the Street Network,HOV,Transit and Non-motorized
Elements and are a necessary part of maintaining transportation level of service standards.
The total cost of the 20-year transportation plan is estimated at$134 million. The costs of the various
components of this plan are summarized in Table 8.1. The costs for the arterial,HOV and non-motorized
components represent Renton's costs(including Renton's share of responsibility under joint projects with
WSDOT and other local jurisdictions). This cost does not include costs of transportation projects that are
the responsibility of the state,King County, and other cities(Newcastle,Tukwila,and Kent). The transit
costs include only local match for Renton's local feeder system improvements,park-and-ride lots, signal
priority, and transit amenities.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include continued refinement of the 20-year transportation plan
and costs.
Inventory of Funding Sources
Having established a 20-year transportation funding level of$134 million, an annual funding level of$6.7
million can be determined. Sources of revenue to provide this annual funding need are identified on Table
8.2.
The Business License Fee is an annual per capita fee assessed to all businesses within the City of Renton.
Currently, 85% of the annual revenue generated from this fee is dedicated to fund transportation
improvements. The Business License Fee is assumed to contribute 28% of the future annual funding level.
XI-61
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
TABLE 8.1
RENTON 20-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES
Arterial Plan: _ $ 60,000,000
HOV Plan: _ $ 26,000,000
Transit Plan: _ $ 15,000,000
Non-motorized Plan: _ $ 4,500,000
Annual Programs: _ $ 28,500.000
Tota120-Year Cost = $ 134,000,000
XI-62
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
TABLE 8.2
CITY OF RENTON
SOURCE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
Annual 20-Year
Business License Fee $ 1.88 million $ 37.6 million
Half-Cent Gas Tax $ 0.35 million $ 7.0 million
Grants $ 3.90 million $ 78.0 million
Developer Mitigation $ 0.57 million * $ 11.4 million *
TOTAL FUNDS: $ 6.70 million $ 134.0 million
* In addition, there will be site-specific mitigation.
The Half-Cent Gas Tax is a portion of the State gas tax revenue that is distributed to local jurisdictions
based on population. The Half-Cent Gas Tax is assumed to remain at its current level and contribute 5.2%
of the future annual funding level.
The City of Renton has aggressively pursued federal and state grants in the past,which is assumed to
continue,thus providing 58%of the future annual funding level. Examples of federal grants include the
Surface Transportation Program(STP), Congestion Management Air Quality(CMAQ), and Transportation
Enhancements Program,which are awarded regionally by the Puget Sound Regional Council and bridge
replacement,road safety, and railroad crossing improvement programs administered by WSDOT. State
grants include those provided by the Transportation Partnership Program(TPP),the Arterial Improvement
Program(AIP), and Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program(PSMP),which are administered by the
Transportation Improvement Board.
Developer mitigation revenue is obtained by the City of Renton through an assessment on development
city-wide,based on the number of daily vehicle trips generated by a specific development multiplied by a
fee per vehicle trip. Developer mitigation is assumed to contribute 9%of the future annual funding leveL It
should be noted that developer mitigation is not a reliable(or stable) source of transportation funds(as
required by GMA). The irregularity of private development proj ects and thus uneven flow of mitigation
revenue contribute to the unreliability of developer mitigation. It should also be noted that, in addition to a
mitigation fee,private development approval will be conditioned on site-specific improvements to ensure
that on-site and adjacent off-site transportation facility impacts are mitigated.
Local Improvement Districts(LIDs)are formed by property owners to provide funds for the portion of the
cost of improvement projects that benefit the properties. Petitions from two-thirds of the property owners
of property equal to two-thirds of the assessed valuation of the LID area are required in order to form an
LID. Because it cannot be determined when there will be enough petitioners to form an LID and,therefore,
XI-63
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Rev.il-Ol-04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
it is not lrnown when an LID can be formed to make improvements, LIDs have not been included as a
source of transportation funds.
The above revenue sources are projected to remain approximately the same over the next 20 years,though
the percent contribution from individual sources may change. However,trends in transportation financing
are becoming apparent,which could affect the City of Renton's transportation revenue. The trends include:
declining revenue available from several existing sources, such as the half-cent gas tax; transportation needs
growing faster than available revenues; local, state, and federal requirements on transportation
improvements lengthening the design process and increasing cost; the undetermined potential for new
funding sources; and,the continued inability of regional agencies to address regional transportation needs.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include a review and update of current revenue sources to reflect
federal, state,and regional decisions regarding these revenue sources.
Funding Program
The Growth Management Act(GMA)requires"an analysis of funding capability to judge needs against
probable funding resources." This includes development of a"multi-year financing plan" based on the
needs identified in the transportation plan with"appropriate parts" serving as the basis for the Six-year
Transportation Program required by the RCW for cities.
The following presents the City of Renton's transportation finance plan(as required by GMA)and the
underlying assumptions,which are:
♦ to provide both a 20-year and a six-year transportation improvement program
♦ establish consistency between the six-year and 20-year programs.
A 20-year transportation program(comprised of improvements discussed previously in the Street Network,
HOV,Transit,and Non-motorized Chapters and annual transportation programs) and a planning level cost
estimate of$134 million(summarized on Table 8.2)have been established first. Based on the 20-year
funding level of$134 million, an annual funding level of$6.7 million was determined. Having established
an annual funding rate it can reasonably be assumed that if this funding level is maintained,if the facilities
being funded are consistent with the 20-year plan, and if transit and HOV facilities are conscientiously
emphasized, it should be reasonable to assume that the level of service can be maintained for the
intervening years with the established funding rate.
The City of Renton's Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)is part of an on-going process
intrinsically linked with the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program. The Six-Year TIP is
also linked with various state and federal funding programs,regional/inter/jurisdictional planning and
coordination processes, and the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Projects are developed and prioritized based on both specific goals to be achieved by the program and on
general programming considerations. Those general programming considerations are:
Plannin�. How a project fits with or addresses identified future transportation goals, demands, and
planning processes must be evaluated on both a local and regional level. This is strongly influenced by
ongoing land use decisions and by regional highway and transit system plans.
Financin�. Many projects are dependent on receiving outside grants, formation of LIDs, or the receipt
of mitigation funds. Prioritization has to take into account the peculiarities of each of the various fund
sources and the probabilities of when, and how much,money will be available.
XI-64
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Schedulin�. If a project is interconnected with, or interdependent on, other projects taking place,it is
reflected in their relative priorities.
Past Commitments. The level of previous commitment made by the City in terms of resources,
legislative actions or interlocal agreements also must be taken into consideration in prioritizing TIP
projects.
In addition to the general considerations discussed above,there are five specific project categories through
which the TIP is evaluated and analyzed. They are:
• Preservation of Existing Infrastructure
• Multi-Modal and Transportation Demand Management
• Community Livability and Enhancement
• Economic Development
• Operations and Safety
These categories provide a useful analysis tool and represent goals developed through an evaluation of the
City's transportation program in response to input from citizens and local officials and to State and federal
legislation.
Taken as a whole,the five categories provide a framework for evaluating projects both individually and as
part of a strategy that seeks to meet and balance the transportation needs of Renton during a time of
increasing transportation demand,decreasing revenues,and growing environmental concerns.
Although each project can be identified with an important concern that allows it to be classified into one of
the five categories,most projects are intended to address, and are developed to be compatible with,multiple
goals.
Preservation of the existin�infrastructure is a basic need that must be met by the program. The Mayor,
City Council and Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee have all addressed the importance of
sustaining strong programs in this project category. The State Growth Management Act also requires
jurisdictions to assess and address the funding required to maintain their existing transportation system.
Multi-Modal and Transnortation Demand Mana�ement(TDM)projects and programs are oriented
toward"moving people" through a balanced transportation system that involves multiple modes of
transportation and provides alternatives to the existing heavy reliance on the single occupant vehicle
(SOV). Included are projects that facilitate the movement of transit and carpools,and programs that
promote the use of high occupancy vehicles(HOV's)and reduce the numbers of SOV's. The Federal
Transportation Efficiency Act,the State and Federal Clean Air legislation and the State Commute Trip
Reduction Act have added momentum to regional efforts and placed requirements on local
jurisdictions such as Renton to promote these transportation elements.
Communitv livabilitv and enhancement consists of projects that have been developed with major
emphasis on addressing community quality of life issues by improving and/or protecting residential
livability while providing necessary transportation system improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian
projects are included in this category.
XI-65
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Economic develonment projects and programs involve transportation improvements necessitated by
new development that is taking place. Thus,a significant source of local funding for these projects is
projected to come from mitigation payments and from specific access needs financed by new
development in the City of Renton.
Operations and safetv projects and programs are developed through ongoing analyses of the
transportation system and are directed mainly toward traffic engineering concerns such as safety and
congestion. Projects are identified not only by analysis of traffic counts, accident records and
geometric data,but also through review and investigation of citizen complaints and requests.
The City of Renton's adopted 2005-2010 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program includes many of
the transportation improvements and programs identified in the Street Network,Transit,HOV,Non-
motorized and Transportation Demand Management Chapters of this Transportation Element. The projects
or programs are listed in Table 8.3. Also shown in Table 8.3 are annual programs(transportation system
rehabilitation and maintenance,traffic operations and safety; projects and programs, ongoing project
development). The following lists various 2005-2010 TIl'projects under each of the chapters of the
Transportation Element.
XI-66
CTI'Y QF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT O R D I N AN C E N O. 5 Q 9 9
Rev.i 1-43-04
TABLE 8.3
CITIr {�JF RENTQN SIX-YEAR TRANSP4RTATION IMPRQVEMENT
PROGRAM
(2045-2010)
Total Proiect Costs
Frevioas i Sbc Year Totai
�TIP� ProJecLTitle � Costs � 20p5 � 2406 � 2047 I 2008 � 2009 ( 2Q74 �PerbdTotal ICost
t �StreetOverlayProgram I 1,q50.0021 405,QQ01 405,4001 405,000� 4q5,OQ01 405,000� 405,000� 2,430,000� 3.48p,002
2 {SR 1fi71SW 2Tth StlStra�def Bv � ' 355.1T4) 10,000� 10.1NH}1 10.0001 10.�U� 10,dOdi 5.d00� 55,Qd0� 410,174
3 IStrander Bv/5W 27th 5t Cannect. � _ 1,705,460� 800,OQ01 � � 9.394,540� 28,000,000� 26,500.000� 64.694,540� 66,400,000
4 �SR 169 HOV•1�Oth to SR888 � 2,Od0,392� 10.000� _ I 55,t00j 3,680,Op0� 2,350,Q00) � 6,Q95,100) 8,095,492
5 �Renton Urban Shuttle{RUStS? � 20,169f 5.OQQ� 5,0041 5,004� 5,004) 5.004I �.�1 �.�� �,1fi�
6 ITranskPro9hm I s2,saal 2o,aool zo,aoo� zo,aooi zo,aoo� 2o.aool zo.aoo( �zz.aoo� �sa,aea
7 IRainiefAvCor�idarStudy/knprov. ( 267,710) 20,0001 20.0001 20.Oddl 269.d001 2,964,Qd01 3,165,d0U) 8.450,OOOr 6.717,710
s �NE 3rdJNE 4th Carrtdor � 323,892�_ 315,300� 807,5U0� J 5,017,040� 2,100,004! 2.100,000} 10,339,800� 10.663,692
9 �WaikwayPrognm I 317,533) 236,600� 250,C100� 250,0001 250,OOf11 250,0001 25p.0001 1,486,8001 1,804,133
�a IS Lake Wash.RoadwaY knprov. 1 1.504.Q041 I 1 I 9>850.OQO) 14,30Q,p001 23.840.0441 39,950.000! 41.454,000
�� IsR�sa co.rwor se„ay ( I so,000l I I I I I so.000� so,000
12 ISouth Rentan ProJ�cY i 156.800i 182001 � { 240.00Oi 1 I 258.20d1 415,400
,a �1-4U5 knprowsnents in Renton ( az,iss� so.oao1 zo,000l �o,noo! I I � so.tmol �o2,zas
t4 �ProlectpevebpmenUPredesi�n � 271,363� 175,OQ01 175,000� 200,000� 200.0001 200.000� 200.000� 1,150,000� 1.421,363
ts (NE 4th SVHoquiam Av NE I 55.900( 344.800( _ i ( E � j 344.9�� 40Q�000
16 �RafnierAv-SW7thto4thP1 � 80,0001 585,Op0� 2,150,000� 855,000� I ( I 3,590,000� 3,670,000
�7 �Benson Rd•S 26th to Main j 20,000� 459,40d) 2,500) 1 1 I � 481,96d1 481,900
aa 1pRerial CjrcutatWa Program � 195,3Q8�_ 24Q,040� 244.0�4! 240,0001 20Q,000! 254,900� 250,�001 1,304.004� 1,495,308
t9 IBridge Inspectbn 3 Repak � 120,411� A0,0001 140,0001 40,OOOI 615,000) 40,0001 30,000� 905,0001 1,025,411
sa �taoPRaptacemarttPro�rmm � 57.441� 20.400{ 20.0�� 28�0001 20.OQ01 20.0�) 20,OOQ� 124,Od0) 'l77.4d1
2t ISy�nRaqlacementProgram { 13,427� T,500! 7,500� 7,5001 7,50U1 7,500� 7,50(I� 45,000� 58,427
u (Pvla Pro��ram I 47.9741 25,0001 d8,40d1 25,0001 25,000( 25,0001 25,000� 173,400I 221,374
z3 (Soued Transit HQY DirectAccass I 46,523� 1Q,OOQ� 5.004� � ( � � 15,W01 fi1,523
24 ITratficSafetyPragnm � 233,791� SO,OpOI 40,000� 40,0001 40,OOU1 40,0001 40,000� 280,QOOI 513,T91
2s (Tntfic Efficiency Program 1 25Q.505t 25i.900� 11d,4�) TS,d00( 30.fl00) 3d.040� 3Q.000� 531.300� 789,805
2s �CBO Bike�Ped.Connectlons � 25,272� 50,000� 50,0001 10,000� 590.000( 414,OQ0� 5,000� 1.115,000� 1,140,212
27 �Artr�lal Rehab.Pro9. � 537.800� 195,OpdI ' 2d0,0001 205,000� 340.00OI 230.000� 184,0001 1.390.QOdl 1,927,800
� 2a (Duvail Ave NE � _ 667,781� 1,258.704! 1.692,t?00� � E E j 2.954.706� 3.618.481
� � ISuhseWuvalllntors�ction I 115,p001 381,0001 � I � � � 381.000� 496,000
so �RR Crossi�4 Safety Prog. � 5.'l98� S,OWC 5,000� 10,d00� � 1 10,Od0� 30,000� 35,19$
� st �TDMPragram 4 100,8T01 64.20Q! 64,240� 64.2001 64,200� 64,200� 64.200� 385.2001 485,870
u �Trans Concurrency I �.�ea� ao,000i �o,aoo� ao,oaol �o.00ai io,00a� so,000� �ao,000l �a�,�aa'
33 �Missing Links Prof��m � 36.35fl1 �.�0� �,�I �,�� 34.440� 3Q,IX�1 30.4001 180.4001 216.350
sa �GISNeodsAssessment � 44,874� 35,0001 35,000� 20,0001 20.000� 20.000� 2p.00U� 150,000� 194,874
ss iGradY�lYCorridorStudY i 5,b00i 35.Od0� 120,OOd) 8q000� 230.000� 1�810,0001 1.Q24.000) 3.295,QOd) 3.300,000
as (BicYcle Routs Dsv,Pro�ram I 24,T981 24,OOQl 78,000} 18.0001 110.000! 80,0041 80.�041 326.0001 354,788
� 37 ILake Wash.Bv-Park ta Coulon Pk � 329,900� 79,5p0� I 749,1001 I I � 228.600� 558,500
3a ��bera�encY St9nat Coord. ( 2fi.5721 12.00d( 1 1 � 1 1 42.004j 38,b72
ss �Environmental Manka�inp � 223,711( 85,0001 75,OOOI 50.0001 25,000� 25,OQ0� 25,000� 285,000� 508,711
40 (Trans-Vaiiey 8 Soos Craek Corr. 1 7,300� 5,006t I i � � � $��� 1z'a�
•t IWSDOT Coo�rdlnation ProA�m I 18.857� 1Q.00QI t0.OQ4I 10.0001 10,()OQ) 10,0001 10.000{ 60,0001 78.857
42 li%fortheArts � 20,t700� 50,OQ01 30.Q00� 30,000� 54.00OI 30,000� 30,000� 220.U00� 240�000
ss IArtertat HOV Pro(tnm 1 i25.35d1 10.00OE 10.000! 1 f � i 2Q.400# 1A5.354
♦a �ParkSunsetCorrMor � 7,889� 25.000! 50,000� 390,000� 1,691.00G� 1.059,4001 ( 3.215,000� 3,222.889
ns �Lind Av-SW 16th-SW 43rd i 5,000) S.00OI 5,Q00� � i.91b,000� 626,000� � 2.556.4005 2.555,60(T
ts I�san Rd S!S 31stSt I 138.5041 61,500k i I � I � 81.50Q! 200,004
a7 �Lo�qan Av Concrote Panel Repatr I � 1 � � 460.000� � I 460,OQ0� 46Q,000
�a ICa�rllNiltSl8tfal i 1 s.000i �o,aooi 2a.000l aao,�l �oo.00al �o.oaol 7ss.oaal rss,�
49 ITransk P�iority Signal System I 1,280,315� 30.00�1 I � � � � 30.000� 1,310,315
� so �TransitCentarVidao t 2s.�s1{ �a,000{ i 1 I � I �o,aool ss,ss�
s� �HouserVYy S-Main ta Bumekt I I I I 1 a�o.00al ; I a�o,000l a�o.000
52 �Trans Valley ITS � 50,p00� 5,000� 5,000� � � � � 10.000� 60,000
53 �lake Wash.Bv Siip P1aoe � 829AOd� 14.fiQ4� N � � � � 10,804I 640.440
54 (Monster Road BrWge � 500,000� 12,Op0� � I � I � 12,W0� 512,000
55 �SW 7th StlLind Ave SW 1 273,577� 26,423� � i I I I 26.423f 30p,000
5e �Duwaii Ave NE-KHtg Cav�ty ! 547.858� 1,311,3421 2,810.800� f � 1 ( 4,422,'fA21 4,670,040
ITotalSou►ees 1 14938.$361 7.986.4651 9.'i70.7001 3.364.3001 28.964.6401 55.$21.100� 58.36�.1001 164.214.3051 179.153.141
C1RiRao+
XI—Lt i
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Street Network
• South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements(TIP#10)
• Rainier Avenue—SW 4`�'Place to SW 7`�'Street(TIP#16)
• Grady Way—Main Avenue to West City Limits(TIP#35)
• Lind Avenue S.W.—S.W. 16"'Street to S.W.43rd Street(TIP#45)
• Duvall Ave N.E.—Sunset Boulevard to Renton City Limits(TIP#28)
• Mill Avenue South/Carr Road(TIl'#48)
• Strander Boulevard—SR-181 to Oakesdale Avenue S.W. (TIP#3)
• Sunset Boulevard/Duvall Avenue NE(TIP#29)
• Benson Road—South 26`t'Street to South 31St Street(TIP#46)
• N.E. 3rd/N.E.4th Corridor Improvements(TIP# 8)
• Rainier Avenue Corridor Study/Improvements (TIP#7)
• Lake Washington Blvd.—Park Avenue North to Coulon Park(TIl'#37)
• Park Avenue North/Sunset Boulevard—North 6"'to Duvall Avenue N.E. (TIP#44)
• S.W. 7`�'StreebLind Avenue S.W. (TIP#55)
• South Renton Neighborhood Improvements(#12)
• N.E.4`i'/Hoquiam Avenue N.E. (TIP#15)
Also included are expenditures for study of the SR 169 Corridor(TIP project#11).
Included in the Six-Year TII'is the Arterial Circulation Program(TIl'#18),which will provide funding for
further development of multi-modal improvements on Renton's arterials to support the Transportation Plan
and comply with clean air legislation. Also included are expenditures for project development studies (TIP
#14)for development of future TIP projects and grant applications for currently proposed and future TIP
projects.
Transit
• Transit Program: facilities to support regional transit service,local transit service improvements;
development of park and ride lots,transit amenities(TIP#8)
• Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH)Program: operation of the shuttle bus service within Renton. (TIP
#5)
• Transit Priority Signal System: development and implementation of traffic signal programming to
give priority to transit vehicles. (TIP#49)
Also,the HOV Chapter improvements identified below will be designed to enhance transit service.
HOV
• SR-167/S.W. 27�Street HOV(TIP#2)
• Sound Transit HOV Direct Access(TIP#23)
• SR-169 HOV—Sunset Blvd. to east City Limits(TIP#4)
It should be noted that the expenditure shown for Sound Transit HOV Direct Access(TIP#23)is for
coordination with the State and Sound Transit direct access interchange improvements.
Included in the Six-Year TIP is the Arterial HOV Program(TIP#43),which will provide funding for
further development of Renton HOV improvements identified previously in the HOV Plan(Figure 3-1),to
examine additional routes and corridors for HOV facilities in Renton, and for coordination with direct
access HOV projects.
XI-68
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Non-Motorized
• Benson Road Improvements—South 26"'to Main Avenue(TIP#17)
• CBD Bike and Pedestrian Connections(TIP#26)
Also included in the proposed Six-Year TIP is the Walkway Program(TIP#9),which will provide funding
for sidewalk and handicap curb ramp needs identified in the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide
Walkway Program. The Bicycle Route Development Program(TIl'#36)will upgrade existing bicycle
routes,construct missing links in the bicycle route system, and develop, evaluate,prioritize future bicycle
facilities. These projects are in addition to bicycle and pedestrian improvements, anticipated as part of
arterial,HOV and transit projects.
Implementation of the non-motorized element falls into two categories-walkways/sidewalk and bike
facilities. Each of these components are described below.
Walkwavs/Sidewalks Implementation. The implementation procedures for the City's comprehensive
walkway/sidewalk program is detailed in the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study. This
report identifies the sidewalk and curb ramp needs within the City. Specific improvements will be
prioritized and will respond to the needs of school children,the aged and persons with disabilities, and will
support increased use of transit.
Bike Facilities Imnlementation. Bicycle facilities include lanes along roadways and signed bicycle routes.
Current funding is provided for the construction of segments of the Lake Washington Loop Trail.
Bicycle route designation and signing along City roadways is provided on an as-needed basis by the
Transportation Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. Project prioritization
is determined by the Transportation Systems Division in coordination with the Community Services
Department.
Funding for bicycle signing is provided through the capital improvement programs and the General Fund
operating budgets of the Transportation Systems Division. Signing specifically identified as part of
transportation projects will be funded through the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP).
Trails Imvlementation. Many of the planned pedestrian/bicycle facilities in the Long Range Parks,
Recreation,Open Space and Trails Plan, administered by the Community Services Deparirnent,would be
valuable components of the transportation system, and,therefore,are coordinated with the Transportation
Plan. The Long Range,Parks,Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan contains the recommended six-year
trails development program. Only projects that are specifically identified as transportation facilities will be
included in the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP).
TDM/CTR
• Transportation Demand Management Program: implement Commute Trip Reduction Act
requirements,other TDM programs(TII'#31)
Funding Assessment
A 20-year transportation program has been established having an estimated cost of$134 million. This
program was the basis for determining an annual funding level of$6.7 million. Assuming this annual
funding level can be maintained over the 20-year period(2002-2022),it is reasonably certain that the 20-
year transportation program can be implemented. Annual reassessment of transportation needs,continuing
XI-69
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
to aggressively pursue grant funding, and/or continuation of the strong rate of growth in Renton,which will
generate higher developer mitigation revenue,will be needed over the intervening years in order to assume
the 2022 transportation program can be achieved.
The City of Renton's proposed 2005-2010 Six-Year TIP includes 56 individual projects and programs,with
a total estimated cost of$179.15 million. Of this total cost, approximately$164.2 million is to be expended
over the 2005-2010 six-year period. (It should be noted that for several projects and programs,
expenditures over the six-year period are shown,not the total project or program cost.) The difference of
about$15 million represents expenditures prior to year 2005.
The projected revenues over the six-year period,based on the established$6.7 million annual funding,will
total$40.2 million. The TIP identified expenditures of$164.2 million is$124 million more than the
projected revenues. Of this $124 million,approximately$64 million represents the amount of participation
anticipated by the State, Sound Transit,King County,neighboring jurisdictions, and private sector
contributions on joint projects. As previously discussed,transportation improvement expenditures of other
jurisdictions have not been included when establishing the $6.7 million annual funding level. Therefore,
the Six-Year TIP expenditures exceed projected revenues by$60 million.
In order for projects to be eligible for projected funding,they must be,by law,included in the Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). Because it is not possible to know which projects will qualify
for funding,the Six-Year TIP includes a cross-section of projects to provide a list of projects that will be
eligible for funding from the various revenue sources,when and if, such funds become available. The result
is a Six-Year TIP which has expenditures exceeding projected revenues.
The challenge for the future will be to secure enough funding for the City of Renton, Cities of Tukwila and
Kent,King County, Sound Transit, and the state to implement the improvements to their respective
facilities included in the Transportation Plan. However, several strategies for acquiring needed funding are
evident at this time. They include:
♦ Establish interjurisdictional funding mechanisms, such as payment of mitigation fees to address
impacts of growth within adjacent jurisdictions that affect the City of Renton.
♦ Update transportation priorities annually and incorporate in the Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Program.
♦ Continue to work more aggressively with adjacent cities,King County,Washington State
Department of Transportation and other agencies to fund their respective improvements in the
Transportation Plan,i.e.,through joint projects.
♦ Continue to work with regional agencies to encourage them to find and fund regional solutions for
regional transportation problems.
Mitigation Process
There are new laws and regulations that have tremendous impacts on land use,the need for new or different
kinds of transportation projects and programs,and costs and funding of transportation projects. Examples
are the Wetlands Management Ordinance, Surface Water Management Ordinance,the Clean Air Act,
Commute Trip Reduction Act,Endangered Species Act,and the Growth Management Act. As a result,a
transportation mitigation policy and process has been developed as part of the transportation plan. This
xi-70
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
mitigation policy serves as a framework for the citywide mitigation payment system that was adopted by
the City in 1996. This mitigation policy includes the City of Renton:
♦ Developing a citywide 20-year transportation system improvement plan(defined in the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan).
♦ Determining the cost of the citywide 20-year transportation improvements to support new
development.
♦ Establishing a fee for developments'pro-rated share of the cost of the citywide 20-year
transportation improvements(in addition to site-specific mitigation required by the City). This
mitigation fee would be established during the SEPA review process and paid during the project
development process.
♦ Continuing the current established business license fee and percentage of the business license fee
allocated for transportation purposes as has been the custom in the past.
♦ Having the flexibility to modify the citywide transportation plan as needed to address
environmental/regional coordination issues.
♦ Approving future development conditioned upon site specific improvements to ensure that on-site
and adjacent transportation facility impacts are mitigated, and the payment of the mitigation fee as
the development's fair share contribution towards: 1)ensuring that the cumulative impacts of
development can be mitigated; and 2)maintaining the City of Renton adopted level of service
standard. Site specific improvements could include construction of additional traffic lanes and/or
traffic signals.
Mitigation Payment System
The development mitigation fairshare cost has been established at$75 per daily vehicle trip.
The developer mitigation fee is based on the total daily increase in vehicle trips generated by the specific
development project multiplied by the vehicle trip rate fee. In addition to this fee,there may be site-specific
improvements required by the City, such as construction or contribution towards construction of additional
traffic lanes and/or traffic signals,to mitigate on-site and adjacent facility impacts. (New business
development will also pay the annual per capita business license as currently required of all businesses in
the City of Renton).
Additional information on the determination of the mitigation trip rate fee is contained in the Renton
Transportation Mitigation Fee Support Document.
A development may qualify for reduction of the $75 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits
for development incentives,construction of needed transportation improvements(arterial,HOV,transit),
through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management programs. Specific credits and
the amount of reduction in the mitigation trip rate fee that could result from such credits will be determined
on a case by case basis during the development permitting process. The Mitigation Payment System
provides flexibility to modify the basic trip rate fee as needed to respond to the effect that credits may have
on developer mitigation as a funding source.
XI-71
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Concurrency Management System
The Growth Management Act(GMA)describes concurrency as the situation where adequate public
facilities are available when the impacts of development occur,or within a specified time thereafter. This
description includes the concept of available public facilities. The GMA defines "available public
facilities" as facilities or services in place,or a financial commitment in place,to provide the facilities
within a specified time. For transportation,the specified time is six years from time of development.
City of Renton policies that support the GMA's definition of concurrency have been identified in the Land
Use Element and in this Element. To address concurrency under the GMA and City of Renton policies, a
concurrency management system has been developed for the City of Renton that is based on the following
process:
• The City of Renton will adopt a multi-modal Transportation Plan that will be consistent with regional
plans and those of neighboring cities. Improvements and programs of the Transportation Plan will be
defined in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
• The City of Renton Transportation Level of Service(LOS)Policy, although it differs from the
traditional LOS for arterials,is consistent with King County Growth Management Countywide
Planning Policies and will be used to evaluate the City of Renton Transportation Plan.
• If the region decides to lower regional LOS by not providing regional facilities,then Renton will
adjust its LOS policy accordingly.
• The Transportation Plan will include a financial component with cost estimates and funding strategy.
One of the fund sources will be mitigation fees collected from developers as a condition of land use
development within the City of Renton. The approval of the development will be conditioned upon
the payment of this Transportation Mitigation Fee and site-specific mitigation of on-site and adjacent
facility impacts.
• The City of Renton may allocate the developer funds to any of the improvement elements of the
citywide Transportation Plan in such a manner to assure that concurrency between transportation LOS
and land use development is met.
• The City of Renton will establish concurrency by annually testing the citywide Transportation Plan as
funded in the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program to ensure conformance with the Level
of Service standard. The City of Renton will adjust the transportation improvement plan as necessary
to meet the LOS standard.
• Based upon the annual test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels
included in the LOS-tested Transportation Plan,payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee,and an
application of site specific mitigation, development will have met City of Renton concurrency
requirements.
Transportarion Concurrency Regulations(Ordinance No.4708, adopted 3-2-1998)and Guidelines and
Procedures for Monitoring Transportation Concurrency(adopted 4-6-1998)comprise the procedures,
standards and criteria that allow the City of Renton to determine whether adequate public facilities are
available to serve new land use development.
XI-72
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
As specified in the Regulations and Guidelines and Procedures,a concurrency test is conducted by the City
of Renton for each non-exempt development activity. The concurrency test determines consistency with the
adopted citywide Level of Service standard and the Concurrency Management System,using rules and
procedures established by the City of Renton. The concurrency test includes technical review of a
development activity by the City of Renton to determine if the transportation system has adequate or unused
or uncommitted capacity, or will have adequate capacity,to accommodate vehicle trips generated by the
proposed development,without causing the level of service standard to decline below adopted standards, at
the time of development or within six years. A written finding of concurrency is provided by the City prior
to the approval of the development permit. If the development activity fails the concunency test,the City
allows the development applicant to submit alternative data,provide a traffic mitigation plan, or reduce the
size of the development project in order to achieve concurrency.
Monitoring, and evaluation of the City of Renton's Concurrency Management System and Transportation
Concurrency Regulations will be reviewed as part of ongoing transportation work.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES
The Environmental and Natural Resources Chapter describes objectives,policies,and strategies to help
protect Renton's natural resources and Renton residents from unacceptable air and water quality impacts of
the transportation system. Clean air and water are necessary for healthful living in an urban society.
Objectives
T-X: Protect and promote clean air to ensure a healthful environment.
T-Y: Reduce vehicular emissions by encouraging increases in carpooling,vanpooling,transit, and non-
motorized transportation usage.
T-Z: Ensure the long-term protection of the quality of water resources of the City of Renton.
T-AA: Reduce the impact on water quality from vehicular pollutants associated with run-off from
impervious transportation facility surfaces.
T-BB: Preserve and protect natural resources(particularly critical areas and wildlife habitat).
Policies
Policy T-69. Promote programs which maintain Policy T-72. Incorporate in transportation
mobile source pollutant levels at or below those facilities vehicular pollutant and surface water
prescribed by the EPA, State Department of run-off management and treatment techniques
Ecology, and the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. that maximize water quality.
Policy T-70. Comply with the stipulations Policy T-73. Comply with the stipulations
described in the State Implementation Plan(SIP) described in federal, state,and local water quality
for air quality compliance. standards and regulations.
Policy T-71. Promote water quality by Policy T-74. Develop transportation plans and
encouraging increases in carpooling,vanpooling, projects to comply with City, state, and federal
transit, and non-motorized transportation usage. regulations that address critical areas and wildlife
habitat.
XI-73
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Also see related Policies in the Environmental County Countywide Planning Policies,which by
Element,the Land Use Element,and the King this reference, are incorporated in this Chapter.
Air Quality--Implementation Plan
The City will subscribe to the plans,policies, and programs catalogued in the State Implementation Plan for
air quality non-attainment areas. Transportation demand management(TDM) strategies will be
encouraged,including the Commute Trip Reduction Law. Existing vehicle programs such as the winter
oxygenated fuels and vehicle inspections will be continued, supported,and updated as requirements
demand.
Ongoing transportation planning work will include the review of the latest information from state and local
agencies regarding air quality non-attainment areas, severity of violations and implementation plans.
Improving Water Quality
The City of Renton will comply with federal, state, and local plans,policies and programs for water quality.
The City's Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan focuses on increasing the availability and use
of HOV,transit,and non-motorized transportation modes and transportation demand management
strategies. The intent of this program is to reduce vehicular traffic which will make it possible to limit the
expansion of the existing roadway system and, in certain locations,limit additional impervious surfaces.
This,in turn,will reduce vehicular pollutants and their effect on water quality.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
A multitude of agencies are involved in transportation planning and improvement. To become better
integrated into the regional transportation system,Renton needs to strengthen its role in the region,
especially in South King County,East King County, and the Puget Sound area, and participate in regional
forums as transportation decisions are made. This is particularly important since a disproportionate number
of the vehicles on Renton's arterials are pass-through traffic. Also,Renton continues to be a major regional
employment center and decisions made about future transportation systems for the Puget Sound area will
directly impact the future of Renton's commercial and industrial base.
With requirements of the Growth Management Act mandating concurrency between land use and
transportation planning,the kind of interjurisdictional cooperation envisioned in the policies has become
more of a reality. However,in this environment it will become increasingly important for Renton to
support negotiation tools such as interlocal agreements, and participate in interjurisdictional decision
making.
Therefore,the City of Renton participates in regional forums and supports transportation plans that preserve
the livability of our neighborhoods,maintain the economic vitality of our City, and provide for an improved
environment for future generations. This will be accomplished by:
• providing a multi-modal regional plan with HOV,transit and other modes serving Renton; and
• providing regional financial strategies which encourage other than SOV travel.
The City of Renton has prepared and adopted a multi-modal Transportation Plan,which is consistent with
regional plans and plans of neighboring cities.
XI-74
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11-01-04
Objectives
Objectives and Policies which address the need for coordination between regional and local agencies with
respect to transportation planning and operation needs are presented below:
T-CC: Coordinate transportation operations,planning and improvements with other transportation
authorities and municipalities.
Policies
commuter rail stations and light rail transit
Policy T-75. A sub-regional transportation stations.
system should be designed and implemented in policy T-80. The City of Renton,in collaboration
cooperation with neighboring jurisdictions. with King County Transit(Metro), should place
Policy T-76. WSDOT should provide funding for high priority in providing transit service to areas
and construct grade-separated inside HOV lanes experiencing high residential and commercial
with direct access(or barrier-separated HOV growth.
facility)in the SR-167 corridor from Auburn to policy T-81. T'he Regional Transit Authority
Renton and I-405 corridor,extending from Sea- (Sound Transit) should provide transit service and
Tac Airport north to Bothell. transit-oriented capital improvements in Renton
Policy T-77. The Regional Transit Plan(RTP) consistent in size, scope, and cost with those
should include regional express bus service to proposed in the voter-approved Sound Move.
downtown Renton. Policy T-82. Give priority to working with King
Policy T-78.Provide park-and-ride lots in County to ensure that King County policies
regarding transportation consistency/concurrency
unincorporated King County to intercept pass ,
in Renton s Potential Annexation Areas are
through traffic affecting the Renton street system. compatible with Renton's transportation plans and
Transit service to these park-and-ride lots should goals.
be frequent in order to encourage transit usage.
Policy T-79. King County Transit(Metro)should Also see related Policies in the Transit Section
provide intra-Renton bus service to serve local and King County Countywide Planning Policies.
activity centers and employment centers,and to
provide frequent, convenient access to future
Current Coordination Activities
The City of Renton has been actively involved in an ongoing dialogue with state,regional,and county
agencies--as well as adjacent jurisdictions and business and community groups in Renton--concerning
Renton's transportation planning goals and objectives. Coordination efforts underway include participation
in the following np •mary forums. (Note: not all committees are listed.)
State Coordination fWashin�ton State Denartment of Transportation(WSDOT1l
I-405 Corridor Studv. The City is participating in this WSDOT study along with representatives of affected
jurisdictions adjacent to I-405. Renton elected officials serve on the study's Executive Committee and
Renton staff serve on the Steering Committee and Technical Committee. The purpose of the study is to work
with local jurisdictions to define transportation needs in the I-405 Corridor from Tukwila to Swamp Creek,
and to develop transportation improvement projects for the corridor that complement local plans, goals,and
obj ectives.
XI-75
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
�ional Coordination
South Countv Area Transvortation Board(SCATBd). The purpose of the group is to serve as a central
forum for information-sharing, consensus-building,coordination to resolve transportation issues,and to
implement transportation programs and projects that benefit the region in general and South King County
area jurisdictions in particular. Voting members include King County and the cities of Algona,Auburn,
Black Diamond,Burien, Covington,Des Moines,Enumclaw,Federal Way,Kent,Maple Valley,Milton,
Normandy Park,Pacific,Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila. Non-Voting members include Sound Transit,Pierce
Transit,the Port of Seattle,the Puget Sound Regional Council,WSDOT, and the State Transportation
Improvement Board(TIB).
Eastside Transnortation Partnership(ETPI. ETP is a coalition of Eastside cities(similar to SCATBd),with
representatives from Bellevue,Kirkland,Redmond,Issaquah,Bothell,Mercer Island, Sammamish,
Woodinville,Newcastle,and Renton. Representatives from WSDOT, Sound Transit,King County,PSRC,
TIB, and Snohomish County also are participants. Renton's primary affiliation and purpose for participating
in the group is to coordinate Eastside and South County issues.
Pu�et Sound Re�ional Council(PSRC). The PSRC is a regional council of governments and the local MPO
and RTPO,with representatives from every agency,jurisdiction,and governing body in King County,Pierce
County,Kitsap County and Snohomish County. Staff level technical committees meet regularly to discuss a
wide range of transportation topics related to the region's long range growth and transportation strategy as
envisioned under vISION 2020 and Destination 2030,including finance,transportation improvement
programs,commute trip reduction issues,regional transportation forecast data,air quality, and other issues
requiring regional coordination.
Central Pu�et Sound Reeional Transit Authoritv/Sound Transit. The City coordinates regularly with Sound
Transit staff,as Sound Transit is the regional transit service provider. For long range planning,Renton and
other jurisdictions are working with Sound Transit to implement Phase 1 of the Regional Transit Plan(Sound
Move),which includes Regional Express bus service and associated capital facilities, and HOV/transit
exclusive interchanges and/or arterial HOV improvements in Renton.
County Coordination
KinQ Countv Metro. The City is also coordinating with King County Transit(Metro)in the development of
local bus service plans that will complement the Sound Transit regional transit service concept.
Kin�Countv Public Works Directors. The City works as a member of this group on numerous and varied
transportation action issues of concern to local jurisdictions including making recommendations for projects
to be funded with the regional distribution of federal transportation funds.
Commute Trip Reduction. Another group within King County is responsible for coordinating regional and
South County Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)issues in cooperation with local jurisdictions and King
County. Working groups have been established for the purpose of coordinating state-required CTR
ordinance and plan development/adoption by local jurisdictions and King County. With most local
jurisdictions having successfully adopted local CTR ordinances,the group is now focusing on the successful
implementation of the ordinance requirements(working with affected employers)and on starting a parking
review regional coordinating effort.
XI-76
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Impacts on Adjacent Jurisdictions
The City of Renton is coordinating and will continue to coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions through
interlocal agreements and through appropriate regional,county, local, and state forums to assure consistency
between plans,and to work out acceptable and appropriate agreements regarding local plans.
Impacts on Regional Transportation Plan
The City of Renton has adopted a position that specifies the elements that must be included in a regional
transit plan in order for the City to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The City Council
supports the following elements in the voter-approved regional system plan(Sound Move):
1. A bus element,with early emphasis on express bus service and TSM improvements proposed for the
South County area;
2. A plan that increases local circulation transit services and feeder service connections and provides a
variety of modal options;
3. High Capacity Transit(HCT)to urban and employment centers,including Renton; and
4. A plan that provides convenient connections within the regional bus service,local bus service,and
between the light rail line and the commuter rail system.
Renton is coordinating with Sound Transit to ensure commensurate transit services and/or roadway/freeway
improvements should any elements of the approved regional plan that benefit Renton not be implemented.
Strategies to Address Inconsistencies
Inconsistencies between Renton,the State,King County, Sound Transit,and other local jurisdictions will be
addressed by interlocal agreement as specified in King County Growth Management policies.
ONGOING TRANSPORTATION PLAN WORK
This Transportation Element includes a number of recommendations for ongoing transportation work.This
additional work will include continued refinement of certain elements of the transportation plan and
development of more detailed strategies and programs to implement the transportation plan. The specific
transportation planning tasks are summarized in this section.
Street Network
Level of Service(LOS)
Continue to refine and update Renton's LOS policy to reflect new information on regional and local
transportation plans.
Arterial Plan
Conduct further analysis of the improvements included in the Arterial Plan to verify physical, operational,
and financial feasibility. The analyses will include development of conceptual plans and cost estimates,
assessment of neighborhood and environmental impacts,and the development of more detailed scopes of
improvement,as appropriate. Adjust the Arterial Plan,as needed,to reflect the results on this analysis.
Re-evaluate residential,commercial, and industrial access street function definitions and classifications.
XI-77
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
Transit
Transit Plan
Update and revise Renton's Transit Plan to reflect new information regarding the Regional Transportation
Plan(Sound Move).
Conduct further analysis of the local feeder system transit improvements identified in the City of Renton
Transit Needs Assessment in order to verify operational and financial feasibility. (Includes the development
and incorporation of more detailed bus routing and dial-a-ride needs.)
Level of Service
Continue to refine the transit index of Renton's LOS standard to address transit service frequency.
HOV
HOV Plan
Continue the assessment of criteria for HOV facility planning, design,and operation.
Conduct further analysis of the HOV improvements identified in the HOV Plan in order to verify physical,
operational,and financial feasibility. Also,investigate other potential locations for HOV improvements, and
define scope and cost of the proposed improvements in more detail,as appropriate.
Level of Service
Continue to update the HOV index of Renton's LOS standards, if needed.
Non-motorized
Neighborhood and Re�ional Access
Based on the City of Renton Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study,determine additional bicycle and
pedestrian facilities that support Renton's access needs and complement the Regional Transit Plan and local
transit system.
Bicvcle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan
Update the routes identified in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan to reflect the reassessment of
neighborhood and regional access needs. Identify, in cooperation with other City of Renton departments and
citizen groups,the facilities that could be included in the City of Renton's transportation funding program.
TDM/CTR
Existing Parking Supply and Demand
Inventory existing citywide on-site and off-site parking facilities to determine number of spaces and
utilization, if needed during future review of parking policies,guidelines,and regulations.
Parking Policv Review and Revisions
Continue to review,update and/or revise Renton parking policies to complement other elements of the
Renton Transportation Plan and to be consistent with regional parking policies. Working in regional forums
propose parking regulation revisions to be worked out on a sub-regional basis.
Emnlover Mode Sulit
With assistance ftom King County, evaluate updated Renton employers CTR data and revise citywide
employer mode split if needed.
xi-�g
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
TDM/CTR Pro r� ams
Renton's CTR ordinance was amended in February, 1998. Public and private employers have developed
programs for complying with the ordinance. Annual review of these programs will be conducted to monitor
progress toward meeting CTR goals.
Parkin�Mana�ement Ordinance
Continue to review the City of Renton parking regulations for revisions to complement the Renton Land Use
Element and Transportation Element and to be consistent with regional and other local jurisdictional parking
policies.
Airport
Continue to update the goals, objectives,policies, functional requirements, and implementation strategies of
the Airport Chapter of the Transportation Element as needed.
Frei�ht
Inventorv of Local Rail Svstem Facilities and Users
Update assessment of rail use compatibility with current land uses and FAST implementation strategies,as
needed.
Regional Accessibilitv
Continue to review,and update if needed,the assessment of Renton rail use with respect to implications of
the Regional Transit Plan(Sound Move)and to reflect Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
(Sound Transit) decisions.
Freight and Passen�er Rail Use
Review and update the assessment of freight and passenger rail needs,as appropriate.
Financin�and Implementation
Pro�ram and Proiect Costs
Update the scope and cost of improvements determined from the continued feasibility analysis of the arterial
and HOV elements. Also,update the scope and cost of transit,non-motorized and other programs included
in the City of Renton's transportation funding program. Update the cost of the 20-year transportation plan, as
needed.
Mitigation Process
Adjust the citywide developer mitigation fee structure,if needed,to reflect revisions to the financing plan
resulting from further analysis of the Transportation Plan improvements and costs, and funding sources.
Funding Pro�ram
Adjust the priority of projects or programs identified under the Arterial,Transit,HOV,Non-Motorized,and
TDM chapters as needed. Review the multi-year(20 years)financing plan and assess funding needs for the
identified projects or programs. Include appropriate projects and programs in the City's Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). Identify potential sources of additional funds,if funding from
current sources is not adequate,and to reflect federal, State,regional or local decisions regarding availability
of current sources.
Concurrencv
Continue to review, and revise if needed,the implementation,monitoring, and evaluation aspects of the
Concurrency Management System(CMS)and update,as necessary,the rules,regulations and ordinances that
XI-79
CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ORD INANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11-01-04
implement the concurrency requirements. Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions regarding CMS
requirements and regulations.
Environmental and Natural Resources
Continue to review and revise,as needed,the objectives,policies and strategies to minimize or mitigate
impacts of transportation plans on Renton's environment and natural resources. Review the latest air and
water quality implementation plans from local and state agencies, and update if needed.
Intergovernmental Coordination
Continue to coordinate Renton's Transportation Element with adjacent jurisdictions'transportation and land
use goals,countywide policies,regional land use and transportation plans,and statewide goals outlined in the
GMA. Regulations, facilities to be provided,and development actions by regional and other local
jurisdictions may change,which could affect the City of Renton. Pursue strategies to address
inconsistencies,i.e.through interlocal agreements, and adjust Renton's Transportation Element, as needed.
XI-80
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT EXlllblt �L�
Rev.11/O1/04
ORDINANC;� rJ0 0 `_i0��
UTILITIES ELEMENT
GOAL
Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to
accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton.
XII-1
i
CITY OF RENTON UTILITiES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/O1/04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Summary....................................................................................................................................XII-3
GeneralPolicies.........................................................................................................................XII-3
CityManaged Utilities...............................................................................................................XII-4
Non-City Managed Utilities.......................................................................................................XII-5
WaterSupply.............................................................................................................................XII-6
WastewaterSystem....................................................................................................................XII-10
SurfaceWater............................................................................................................................XII-17
SolidWaste................................................................................................................................XII-23
ElectricalSystems......................................................................................................................XII-30
Natural Gas and Fuel Pipelines..................................................................................................XII-35
Telecommunications..................................................................................................................XII-40
xII-2
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/Ol/04
Summary: The Utilities Element guides future utility service within the greater Renton area. It helps ensure
that adequate utilities will be available to both existing and new development. It also ensures that utility
improvements will be used to help implement the Comprehensive Plan and will be phased according to
community priorities. The Utilities Element indicates how utility improvements can be used to maintain
equitable levels of service, guarantee public health and safety and serve new development in a timely manner.
In addition, the Utilities Element defines how to minimize the detrimental impacts of utility improvements on
surrounding development as well as the community as a whole. The Utilities Elements looks to promote
efficiency in the provision or improvement of service wherever appropriate and feasible. In addition, it asks
that the costs of improvements should be distributed in an equitable manner. Beyond the city's existing
boundaries, the Utilities Element fosters coordination with regional and adjacent utility systems. It also guides
the provision of services to areas outside of the City,but within the City's planning area especially in cases of
annexation.
The City of Renton provides water,wastewater, and storm water utility services for citizens residing within the
city limits and by agreement with other purveyors for some areas located outside of the City's boundaries.
Renton contracts with a private hauler for collection of solid waste and residential recycling. Other utility
services that affect the City and are discussed within this Draft Background Report include: cable television,
conventional telephone, fiber optic cable systems, cellular telephone service,natural gas,petroleum products,
and electricity. (See the Annexation Section of the Land Use Element, the Stormwater Section of the
Environrnental Elernent and the Capital Facilities Element for policies related to the Utilities Element.)
General Policies
Discussio�z: The following general policies are designed to ensure that utility services are safely and
efficiently provided, and are constructed in an environrnentally sound manner that reasonably mitigates
impacts on adjacent land uses. Thepolicies also emphasize cooperation and coordination with other agencies,
jurisdictions, and purveyors to create and maintain utilities.
Objective U-A: Provide an adequate level of public utilities in response to and consistent with land use,
protection of the environment, and annexation goals and policies.
Policy U-1. Utility facilities and services should be Policy U-4. Strive to protect the health and safety
consistent with the growth and development of Renton citizens from recognized harmful effects
concepts directed by the Comprehensive Plan. of utility generated environmental hazards.
Policy U-2. Promote the collocation of new public Policy U-5. Encourage the appropriate siting,
and private utility distribution lines with planned or construction, operation, and decommissioning of all
pre-existing systems (both above and below utility systems in a manner that reasonably
ground)in joint trenches and/or right-of-ways minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses.
where environmentally,technically, economically
and legally feasible. Policy U-6. Where appropriate, encourage
conservation in coordination with other utilities and
Policy U-3. Process permits and approvals for jurisdictions.
utilities and facilities in a fair and timely manner
and in accord with development regulations that Policy U-7. Continue to encourage the
encourage predictability. coordination of non-emergency utility trenching
activities and street repair to reduce impacts on
mobility, aesthetics,noise, and other disruptions.
XII-3
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/O1/04
Policy U-8. Continue to coordinate the in order to minimize construction related
construction and replacement of City-managed disruptions and contain costs.
utilities with other public and private infrastructure
Policy U-9. Where appropriate,wark Policy U-11. Identify utility capacity needed to
cooperatively with other jurisdictions to ensure that accommodate growth prior to annexation. Do not
reliable and cost-effective utilities are available to annex areas where adequate utility capacity cannot
meet increasing demands resulting from local and be provided.
regional growth.
Policy U-10. Where appropriate require reasonable
landscape screening of site-specific aboveground
utility facilities in order to diminish visual impacts.
City-Managed Utilities
Discussioi:: The following general policies are designed to ensure that utility services are provided
coricurreratly with new developrnent. The policies are designed to prevent unplanned, disorderly land
developrnerat, which can de�nand costly infrastructure upgrades and expensive temporary solutions. Annexation
policies related to utility provision are intended to create a strong connection between land use and
infrastructure ir�iplementation prograrns. City utility facilities expansion is intended to further the long-term
development goals of tlie City ratlaer tlaan to prornote extension of the utility system of a separate entity.
Objective U-B: Provide and maintain safe,reliable and adequate utility facilities and services for the City's
current and future service area to meet peak-anticipated demands of the City in an efficient, economic,and
environmentally responsible manner.
Policy U-12. Approval of development should be Policy U-16. Encourage the use of water and
conditioned on utility systems with capacity to energy conservation technologies throughout the
serve the development, without decreasing locally City.
established levels of service being in place or with
a financial commitment to provide service within a Policy U-17. Timely and orderly extension of City
specified time frame. provided utility services(water, sanitary sewer,
surface water, solid waste) should be provided
Policy U-13. Coardinate the extension of utility within the City's existing and future service areas to
services with expected growth and development. meet public health and safety requirements.
Policy U-14. Apply level of service standards Policy U-18. Water, sewer, and storm water
consistently throughout the service area far city- facilities and services should be in place prior to
owned or managed utilities. If necessary,this occupancy of development projects.
level-of-service standard may be phased-in over
time. Policy U-19. Implementation and coordination
programs for the improvement,phasing and
Policy U-15. Preference should be given to capital financing of water, sewer, and storm water
facility improvements that will support the infrastructure should be developed consistent with
development and redevelopment of the Downtown, the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
mixed-use centers,the Urban Center, and other
high growth areas concurrent with anticipated Policy U-20. All development should be required
growth. to pay an equitable share of construction costs for
improvements to utility systems for water, sanitary
XII-4
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/O1/04
sewer, and storm water necessitated by that Policy U-24. The owners of all properties, located
development. When utility improvements will in unincorporated portions of the Renton Planning
provide a general public benefit,the City may Area and outside of municipal service areas, should
contribute funds for the construction of agree to develop in accordance with specified City
improvements to utility systems to support the development standards, if granted City utilities.
public interest. Exceptions would be allowed in the cases of threats
to public health and safety.
Policy U-21. Upon annexation, if there is a threat
to health and safety,the City may require upgrading Policy U-24.1. The owners of all properties
of the deficient infrastructure as a condition of the located in unincorporated King County that are
annexation. within Renton's Potential Annexation Area(PAA)
that receive City water services should be required
Policy U-22. The City shall not be responsible for to sign a covenant to annex.
funding the immediate upgrading of utility systems
located in annexed areas. At such time that the Policy U-25. Pursue future annexation of all lands
existing infrastructure is replaced,upgraded or that have recorded covenants to annex ar that
extended, the new infrastructure must conform to receive City water and sewer service using the 60%
City of Renton standards. Assessed Valuation method of direct petition or
other methods that allow for the enfarcement of
Policy U-23. When an annexation encompasses covenants not to oppose future annexation.
property served by a utility district, and that district
continues to provide service,that district will be Policy U-26. In the event of a threat to public
required to execute a franchise agreement with the health and safety,the City utilities may use utility
City in order to operate within the City. resources to prevent or mitigate such threats.
Non-City Managed Utilities
Discirssion: The follotiving policies are designed to ensure Renton is aware of proposed non-city managed
utility facility upgrades and that utility purveyors are fully aware of the City's needs.
Objective U-C: Ensure non-City managed utilities provide service commensurate with required state-
mandated public service obligations and established safety and welfare standards.
Policy U-27. Coordinate data exchange with utility Policy U-30. New or reconstructed structures,
planners for use with the City of Renton's towers, and transmission lines should be designed
geographic information system. to minimize aesthetic impacts appropriate to their
surroundings whenever practical.
Policy U-28. Upon renewal, all franchise
agreements should be reviewed for compliance Policy U-31. Coordinate periodic updating of the
with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and utility element and relevant implementing
the State of Washington Growth Management Act. development regulations with adjacent jurisdictions
and purveyors.
Policy U-29. New telecommunications and electric
utility distribution lines should be installed Policy U-32. Encourage the exchange of
underground within the City where practical in information relevant to public and private planning
accordance with rules,regulations, and tariffs processes.
applicable to the serving utility.
Policy U-33. Recognize and continue to allow
existing utility facilities that may have regional
XII-5
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/01/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
significance within the City, consistent with the Policy U-34. Ensure that development regulations
goals and policies of the City of Renton are consistent with and do not otherwise impair the
Comprehensive Plan. fulfillment of the serving utilities'public service
obligations.
Water Supply
Background
The Renton Water Utility is operated as a self-supporting enterprise utility under the direction of the Mayor and
City Council. Operations are guided by policies of the City of Renton Comprehensive Water System Plan,
1998. (Update scheduled for adoption in 2005.)
Ciry of Renton Utiliry Service Area
The City of Renton's Water Utility System provides service to an area approximately 16 square miles in size,
and to more than 14,700 customer accounts(Figure 2-1). In addition,the City supplies water on a wholesale
basis to the Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water District through a single metered connection. Boundaries of the water
service area are defined by the City and approved by King County. The City's service area boundaries are not
necessarily the same as the corporate boundaries of the City. Agreements between Renton and adjacent
purveyors allow Renton to serve some areas outside of the city limits and provide for other districts to serve
limited areas within Renton's corporate limit.
Existiizg City Water Supply Facilities Witltin City Limits
Current active and primary water supply sources include five wells drawing water from the Cedar Valley
aquifer,three wells from the Maplewood aquifer and one artesian spring. The wells provide eighty-six percent
(86%)of the City's water production. In addition,the City maintains seven metered backup water supply
interties with Seattle Public Utilities, one emergency intertie with the City of Kent and one emergency intertie
with the City of Tukwila.
Water treatment consists of chlorination, fluoridation, and corrosion control.
As a result of Renton's topography, Renton's service area encompasses twelve hydraulically distinct pressure
zones. A system of booster pump stations and pressure reducing stations allow water transfer between zones.
Currently there are eight reservoirs in the City's water supply system, strategically located to provide adequate
equalizing and fire flow storage. Pressure reducing valves are used to supply lower pressure zones from higher-
pressure zones that contain water reservoirs.
Capacity of Existing Facilities
City's active wells and Springbrook Springs currently provide 11,900 gallons per minute (gpm) or 17.14 million
gallons per day(mgd). The back up Maplewood wells and emergency well can deliver an additiona17,000 gpm
or 10.08 mgd. Together, active, standby, and emergency wells provide 18,900 gpm or 27.22 mgd. Emergency
interties with neighboring cities and water districts can provide 12,000 gpm or 17.28 mgd.
The Washington State Department of Health has established guidelines for estimating the amount of supply
necessary for adequate water supply. Based on composite growth forecasts,the City has sufficient on-line
supply capacity to meet demands through at least 2020.
Forecasted Conditions-City of Renton
XII-6
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/Ol/04
Ciry of Renton Future Water Utiliry Service Needs
The following forecasts are based on Puget Sound Regional Council projections,which have been allocated by
the City of Renton,based on local assumptions. Expected increases in population will result in a total of
61,694 persons(or 26,940 households)living within the current city limits by the year 2010; and, 77,752
persons(or 29,128 households)in the annexation area. The total forecast population of Renton's Planning Area
is expected to be 139,446 persons (or 60,893 households)by 2010.
The total projected maximum day demand by 2010 of about 19.9 mgd is anticipated and provided for in the
adopted and approved 1998 Renton Comprehensive Water System Plan. The completion of the Maplewood
wells,booster pump station and water treatment facility in 1998 should produce adequate quantities of water to
accommodate projected growth,provided the City's existing supply is not lost through contamination or some
other unforeseen event.
City of Reiiton Future Source of Supply
Water demand will continue to increase as the City's population grows. In response,the City has rehabilitated
one emergency well in the Cedar Valley aquifer and developed three others on the Maplewood aquifer. If no
other supply sources are developed, the additional supply from the three wells will adequately meet demands
until at least 2020,
XII-7
� n
� �
< �
� �
~ O
�
o �
�+
�
A I
... ..,.. .. - - - �� —... L ,
z
_�- - , ,
j ��e�'.•..:, , .. ��:: — �i���'�r - . Ilew�' ,.
r. : ,.
...0 .I": �.r.; ?.�" Be � 0
}`� ��/' Le end
`r:i. �1 �:. "' ' lii., y , 7i�t:y' _ ���; fJ y Z
�.. y`.- ' -`�'�jef�erl'�lai�_4�, r���,�/ t ..~~�`�!w~` '�_%"' i \ . •• CunenlSeMceAroe .�.i
'v�, y .:'1 .�r .. ��,,.._ .: ��i_,'J _...._,... ��,h;,.�� '... �.'i; ... . ^_� `, , - Q�FuMeRentonServiceArea y
-_,i; .i.:.i . .:;-.
.,
::. ;._,� .;'.. .��;1 `� - .
, ...: ,...,.. . , _ �
,�, - ` \��::� r� !� ��;� � ��\'�� •i,' � Issaqueh �Boeinq Site Area �
,.. . ; .,.�:. 'T'`"
.._ �. ....� ' '` '�- i �Nev+eaaUs'>' �� ••� Urben Growth Boundery y
.+���.:: ' Uninco oUreted
` y �:�
...� ; '��, ': �
.,� ; :�,� !�--_�. � i . �_� Kinq C nb { � ' ^^ Renton qry Limils ..i
� '
..�.�... , ^;'. .* . �._ � � _._.
;'
?.'
.,.
-�:�.�� . �,�f ir=.�__ ..... _,. ' -- GbLhnlls �
,;k
,�st. .,.�. .;,..�+ i<• - ' '-L � WaterBody
., _.-;,� ' . Seattle� _ ��
C,"""'r
...__:r
.... j. -- -
. .. , � , y �''-+ �
� �
�...,'•
� �
�.
,... . � , ,.i f � ' .�
�,. - ,� �� . �• . ,� r' � � � r
� ' _ _ �
, .
- , , ..
;_.._:,
, .
_ __ ...... _ .
. ..,.,., .�:.:.....': ji'T .
, �
� . . . .:, ,U.. ,� ° :'v\
;y �± '1.:.
; :,_._�,.'.:I'r, , �',, 4'": >�,;, `"C;i;' �
Y� '`;' :';y `; , �
: , ,,. . _
�.,j... r N� �. . ' :.�,. i, "' � .
•'f �.�,at��
li
•�_� L ��.��� i .
I f.i 1. • ./ �Y�.y ��'(, � � � .. '� ,
....._._... ?�� ,.' , ' �
� r . _..^r. _.��; _ �^'; :r;. ,..�-'� i "r' •
,... f f r.. F`,
. <.. ,� _. �'
,"".� . ... �' ., Ir.���_.�..,., - ' _ � .. ''.. .
__ l . r a, �A`�
.... _ _
. . , ,:.-.}.. y
,�` ;
, �.. . _
..
,. ., � ...L: ,� , ..i... - i: '
,_
,
,� � �. ...__... . ..,,__.. f-;i� , ;:
_ ,
... .._- ..
,
i ' �'• '- �v� j!� ,i1< - . •
' � _
. . � �._... �.,.. ,..�
., ,.,. , _ t.� i " . � � •..� '�
��
\ ,: ......,. ,.-,�� �„ � �S`�?..i t�..� `i,-,�.` :.: ;.. . -
.,
-.
.„
,. .. r,}, �...�,. ..:'�.�.� ��: _� $t�' I" }-C_}{��- �,�
„
1 ;. .
� i � �:i.��:... . , k . .,-i. .. . . i ' � . .
�
�
.. ., ,.......{..._,.' �.,.'",�a. � � .. r.l
_4:`.
.
V
, .. ^.�'1„� �.�.:_ ' 7:�;.,= ' _. .a; . . .,
, �
�., .. . :.� �. ,r '+aj, �. 1
� .„ ... .• �.. . . � ' � � '
' i :.t .�,.;..j4� _ .
�"�;-�.� � _, ._.....�.'. ± _ _ � Y Y',�. ,__ . ' sE i '
.' � �
r . �
��... .. �{q
�.�, i�i�t• ��t . �S1ln t
;1.
,
,.... a.� . • --- . .
. . . : „ "•�»ra ,�l.,:_i.._.,.._ . i "
+'t
,• .. .....
' !.I.'� '•1'.
_ ,
.+ ,
,.• � � ('..',;., _. ..._ _
,.:'
,
, _ ' `a°i"'. _ -'-- �
';,�r
;� �
..
.
� �
.,
.X . . . F. �' . . '�. , 1 , I)i" . � . �
ti
, , , , . ''d �,
.� „
:
�, - -.: ; ..; . > , , , ; _ Oton�, ��rl�z �+�� - , . , ...e• . �'
� �e •,...I. �
,... . ,.� `{'{
� , :
._.
.,
. ,. . ,..; ,, � ,. , �-. : S r �,�.... �C
r;
, .._: . , '�
,.,�
F .. • „ A
00 ;
,..,� •.
. n�
� . ,.. . :., :..,: . ;_,, .. ..t� .�- , , !
,
7.. `., ��t"'..: y
. , ^
.
. � . ... .+r .`v'. � � .,_�. 1. '.• , ' rt _ .
�h
l'_'
. . . . . � �r-�: �.M1 . ..,^ *J�i ��i',
,�,:. I
Y.'�' ,. ..
. i
:I
� - ..,.. ...,...., . . ,J„ �ar• . �' . . �
�
,� . . .�: n,4 .(. �
.Tukwile� � r . � •.�.,•.� ,I i ��' .... . ' � - N
� , .. , , , �... _
...� � 1.. � 'j,. '� •.+a i
;
; �
.
;
�,
, ..,
H�-+
., ... .... ,.. + � ' �: ,. ! �,r` �,.:- . ; � . ., i' r.. �`+�i�� �� .
.�i�:....
:'�.. ' . 'p.
M / ,l; . '_!: .,, ro
� , .:. / , � � .
.. . ..,. .,...... . � , � � r
. .
.
. . .. ..._. -.�. , ... •�•
^:�; ':ir; �,,��.���� \ �;:
. '
... ..... . _. . . , ;
..,... . ..,
� � \ �,��" \�� -ti:� �`4 , a � �
� . . '�1'' .K..., \. .� .�' 4�d�.`„�r .'I'�,i^C(.`u.ix� I.:.,
.., . ...:" -.
� ' . . � ,.� -- - o-. __ }rj} .., w ,
. 't .�� o
. .,....,-_..�. - ,., _ ._ _ �.. � r xa
.
�. .�.; � .._ "_' '
� L.
�
,-.�. . � . - .. ' .�..�t. ..
�.
�_ :
. ... . , :,r . i � \^J� _ ..`'(.\`'µ,`, `� .
: ' -- _ � `'h,y,`.11� 'i`7,.i� �yr.t"`�✓.. .� �+� .. ^w� � i .
, ....« .
. . 1�
—
-
_ �-�! '�` ```
�..... .. N
, : , r : �
. ,
i _ _ _ - _ ..
i
....... ... . ... . . ;
, � ' - '`� ; ;
, � ' � � � t'J ..._ r7._...� `2t� `^� � 'S '.� . . �
, .......� .. ... I �- i �..�;
'�SeaTec �--....: � ...,,-�.�f.. ..... ; _.�� i.; \-'k'.'1!I..; � `'�..,:, .., , .' '.�_ . . �
;
�
. ... ..,. � ♦ : � i._� X: t Y�'" �{ V..h_,;.::. . ,
-- t _ _
.:ri
:, �
� . �. � ,! .. `�..._..' `�^� .j..
_ , _, ��.o .���.�.::..:��, :,..,, �. .. A �
, . .
_
�,..' -..v � . - i � . . " - ,an
� � I
. . ....� .i..i -.. ..._ s . • . ,
�� r�:. :� �y � "
'
�. '.' ,;...�.. > . � _ . ' �
. .., . �. . ...,... ,.. . ( . _T���� � - Mies z
... . .....� ; . ;
/
''t
� � ' � , . '�-. . 1� � ' . 0 0.5 1
.._ � '':, e
,� ��`,�..
�,� ._,.� . .. .. . �
' �l
, . , . _ . � ., .�! ; ^`
� :
,
i -i.
.
i' r'
,,: .: : �. ; �-=-• '`;ih �.~.:::;�:.
i`
� .`
. < . / .. ,
.... , .�1: . . ,..._Y � --r-'� � � ': .
:
, a - ,_.. _....
r.
. �+•...:�_' i . _.. !!,_., ...�::',ru a j :.; '�`,_: ' ���\� .
,
�
;.._
.�
�' :
� . , ...;'t:'•., y��.i � -� ' l'�
� :..
:
: `'{
;,
. , ` ,.+ � y�: ;'. �.p .
•'1' \ - , � ' r �p ,�' �. .k� t J
,-: ,�
.i�:,. �� � : � � .* ' 'fA �p'�.� -... ..i . .
. ._.. i '- ' _.
�
,,-.. , , . _ . - ^ Service Area
. ,
.., ,
.
, _ �
, , •� . . � ,
-
� . ; „ Kent� * ' --' •« � Water System Plan
-.
; �r
. r
,j
; ;�•.
i +
.. \ � . .. ;i��._.. _ �1�•
t
. �.. � � �i.I; ; -,�
�. ......_.i . �...� . .
.
. ._._ a:, . :, :..!..�.�; '_�. '( Renron,Washington
; . , , , , ' O
� , � _ _, ; ;; � ' '.)1 ,., : "R �� � .
- ;
, . _ .�....
-� — -----. . „_. ., , , _. �
,
, :
� � � � �,�ni'"J';Y'a _ ��r�:....i� �;�.. �.�11n , .
� •
� , �
� , i ' : ._. � ....� � .i_i ��.., ::�.:��,'F a f,� �.'i,• inp Counryd ...., ..
,
_ �__. -,
:'.
, � , ,. , .. . F g 2-1
,
1 � _, - .�,a.,�. . �' .. . � �
. . : . . �s. .
K ,
,
i -._ ........,., �� ., � �
� : � I ..... � .,. i . -�.-� .rr..
II WNNHIi0�q14000-0001 Cq'MI1wnM�wM�M1nqNY�MM�MM�_V+�� O'^
'W^
W
ik
CITY OF RENTON UTII.ITIES ELEMENT
Rev, 11/01/04 ORDINANCE NO. SQgg
Figure 2-2 �
E�sting Water System ' -
� �;.=__:_>�==:=:;_::.. :-;_� �.._�� � _� .
F:.::::�::�.�:�__��:'_"__"�'�"_.� . . � �.,_
�:;.:_"_=`'`�--- =- - �+ �"�.�� �___,_.,__'_��''�``.
F7::;_<:.�:_'..,'. .. ' ; �t
Li"'„_..�r:.-:::}.'""""",'.1. _ �^,-.\
;-_=::::;_=;:::::== _- MERGBR �
E_�;;-_�;;._= = - ':, _
��;,->:-�=:=;�: - ''� ISLAND � = -�,,�,,��,
`-,::"-=--- - -= `{ - -
�;'=``=;=:=':�-'..>;:;-:"_'_;-:�.-`'� �' - NEWCASTFi$ .
�';;.:_::-=:x:-_ - ---*a - _
t:::-=:_;.._:._ _ _-_ .-._ =>�
v_�:"_<-;:s - =__ _-= = - -
�:_-= --� =- - -- -�--- --�--�`'�- _ -_- --- -- . 'i—_..._____
=��_,�:�t��-�==?i'i'�:�-�='rik',i���=>;:�:'`=-.,:- - . .
. �-_�--, ____-'_-- c:=' _'_-'r=- .__ -> - - - - _ . �
._`-�i:'.;-_'.,ij:.;:`--iE:-:;::::�%_`-�`-=;':=_-..;=;;"?i::-;,-•'-.;`"'::L`;. . L-_
♦.! ����'__ __ __ -.=c _._ ._-__ . _ -- _ ' � . �
_-- _ '_' __' -_' -_ _ - -- - � -
... : -_ _' - " _ _ f^-.."
�:;r?:_:;'.<-__-y:s"L."t�`"-��:'''-�'��'��'�"-'�';'__'r'''��"�.���.'.'.��"-�:�'�
.;`�_:>r-== =-= __-_ ___ ___ ___ __ __ __ "�` ..�.'�'' �
+ �_`,�����= ---- --= -==-- --_ -=- - - _
- =- _-- '��
z� ��:�:��::;`.: - �----�--j
_- -- _
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Discussiota: Groundwater is Renton's primary source of drinking water. Nearly all of the City's water supply
comes from the shallow Cedar Valley Aquifer and from Springbrook Springs. Development of groundwater
supply has been successful in that it has provided substantial volumes of very high quality water. It is assumed
that the potential for increased withdrawal rates is possible and that the aquifer is the City's best source of
long-term water supply.
The Cedar Valley aquifer is shallow and is covered by permeable material. Therefore,potential contamination
problems exist frorn industrial, cornrnercial, and residential development in the aquifer recharge area and frorn
tlze transportation of contaminants through the aquifer area. Groundwater contamination would directly and
i�ri�riediately affect all Renton water customers. The Renton City Council has ranked aquifer protection as its
riz�mber orre priority, and it is the single most important issue in providing a reliable water supply to the service
area.
Tlae City must assure tliat water supplies will be adequate to serve future growth. This can be accomplished
tlirough pruderat use of current sources, the acquisition of new sources, and water reuse programs.
In Renton, thousands of gallons a day of high quality drinking water are currently expended in applications for
which reclairned water is a possible substitute. The cost of treating effluent for reuse is generally less than
acquiring and developingpotable water supply for non potable uses. Using reclaimed water also irnproves the
quality of water bodies by reducing the arnount of effluent discharged into them from wastewater treatment
plafits. Renton is iritegrating a reuse program into its water resource rnanagernent program.
The maximum level of sustainable draw from the City's groundwater system is not currently known. Therefore,
it would not be prudent to cornrnit Renton's potable water resources to supplying future growth in areas outside
of Rentora's present city lirnits when other service options are available. Obligating the City to provide
unirtcorporated areas with water�night impede annexations. This policy direction is not intended to preclude
provision to neighboring areas prompted by emergency conditions.
These policies will help tlze City ensure that adequate water supply is available to serve allportions of the
rnu�ticipal service area at adopted standards.
Objective U-D: Provide,protect, and maintain a consistent, ample, and safe water supply for the City and
future service areas.
Policy U-35. Protect water resources to assure Policy U-39. Water supply sources(i.e.wells,and
continued long-term,high quality groundwater and Springbrook Springs) should be protected from
artesian spring water supplies. uses and activities that have been determined to be
hazardous to these sources.
Policy U-36. Ensure that there is an adequa*e
supply of high quality potable water to meet current Policy U-40. Continue to promote the efficient and
and future water needs. responsible use of water through conservation and
public education programs.
Policy U-37. The intensity and type of
development should be limited in the Aquifer Policy U-41. New alternative source supplies of
Protection Area to those types of development that potable water should be developed through wells or
do not create adverse impacts on the aquifer. other sources.
Policy U-38. Designate and protect areas of Policy U-42. The City's Water Utility will strive to
aquifer recharge within the City's Potential meet maximum day demand during a reasonable
Annexation Area boundary. "worst case" supply system failure.
XII-10
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Policy U-43. Coordinate with the regional Policy U-49. Renton will follow state guidelines in
wastewater purveyor to develop programs to assuming portions of adjacent water systems as a
substitute reclaimed wastewater for potable water result of annexation.
in landscape watering,heating and cooling
buildings, and other safe uses, whenever practical. Palicy U-50. Continue to actively participate in
regional supply forums in order to reduce the cost
Policy U-44. The availability of adequate fire flow of service and improve reliability, quantity and
should be assured prior to the issuance of w�ter quality.
commercial or industrial building permits or the
approval of residential subdivisions. Policy U-51. Pursue the elimination of all supply
from the Seattle Cedar River Transmission
Policy U-45. Allow extensions of water service Pipelines, and supply all customers within the
without annexation, to areas outside of the city Water System's service area from the City's supply
limits: 1)when such areas are within the City's sources. However,the Seattle supply meters will
water service area, or 2)when no other reasonable remain operational to provide emergency supply if
service is available AND it is determined by the it is necessary.
City and/or State Department of Health that a
public health emergency exists or is imminent. Policy U-52. Areas annexed with existing
municipal water supply should be responsible for
Policy U-46. Renton Water Utility will serve areas the costs of utility system improvements needed to
annexed to the City that do not have existing raise the level of service to City standards. These
municipal supply. up�ades may be phased over time if necessary.
Policy U-47. Renton will not supply water to areas Policy U-53. The City may defer compliance with
annexed with other existing municipal water Renton Water Standards in the case of temporary or
suppliers and water districts. emergency water service.
Policy U-48. Renton will use water service Policy U-54. Utilize water conservation and reuse
boundaries, established by agreement as a result of programs to ensure adequate water supply to meet
regional coordinated water system plans and the essential needs of the community.
agreements with neighboring cities and water
districts.
Wastewater System
Discussion: Septic systems are not appropriate means of providing wastewater service in urban or aquifer
protection areas. Therefore, these policies support the provision of primary wastewater service through an
extensive sanitary sewer systern throz�ghout the rnunicipal service area. This system is intended to serve both
new and existing development in a rna�rner consistent with planned land uses and at an appropriate level of
service. Service by the sanitary sewer systern should be in place at tlae time of development.
Existing Conditions
The Renton Wastewater Utility is operated as a self-supporting enterprise utility under the direction of the
Mayar and City Council. Operations are guided by policies of the City of Renton Long-Range Wastewater
Management Plan(current version adopted October, 1999).
City of Renton Utility Service Area
Renton's sanitary sewer service is provided by the City's Wastewater Utility. Portions of Renton are served by
adjacent water and sewer districts,under interlocal agreements. Boundaries separating the City's sewer service
XII-11
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
area from adjacent districts have been agreed upon by the purveyors and the City. It has been Renton's policy to
allow these districts to continue to serve areas after annexation by Renton until assumption of service to these
areas is logical, in accordance with state law, and in the City's interest. Figure 3-1 shows existing service areas
for Renton and adjacent districts.
The City of Renton Wastewater Utility serves approximately 13,800 customers (residential and business)which
includes approximately ninety-five percent(95%)of the City's population and eighty-five (85%)percent of the
City's land area. The remaining five percent(5%) of the population currently uses private,on-site,wastewater
disposal systems.
General Description of Existing City Wastewater Facilities
The City of Renton is divided into seven major wastewater collection basins, each of which consists of one or
more sub-basins. For the most part,these collection basins and sub-basins follow the natural drainage patterns
of the Renton service area. Where the collection basins do not follow the natural drainage patterns, it is
typically due to lack of downstream facilities and the need to pump from a given point into an adjacent drainage
basin.
Renton's sanitary sewer system consists of about 184 miles of�,�ravity sewers, 23 lift stations with associated
force mains, and approximately 3,400 manholes. Wastewater is discharged to regional facilities (King County)
at over 701ocations within the City's service area. The sewage is then conveyed to King County's South Plant at
Renton. Currently,King County's wastewater treatment consists of primary treatment, secondary treatment,and
bio-solids processing. The location of Renton's sewer interceptors and lift stations, as well as King County's
sewer trunk lines and treatment facility, are shown on Figure 3-2.
Capacity of Existing City Wastewater Facilities
Computer hydraulic modeling of the City's system has revealed that facilities in several basins are near
capacity. These areas are addressed in the Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan and the Six-Year
Wastewater Capital Improvement Program.
In addition,there is a capacity issue related to King County's handling of flows. During peak flows,King
County will use its interceptors for storage of wastewater and for controlling flows in the South Treatment Plant
in Renton. This results in wastewater backing up into King County interceptors. King County reserves the right
to allow wastewater to back up in its interceptors to an elevation of 25 feet. Although King County has never
reached this extreme,King County's storage of wastewater in its interceptors has caused Renton's sewers to
surcharge(back up)in low-lying areas through manhole covers and back up side sewer connections into homes
and businesses.
Reliability of Existing City Wastewater Facilities
Problems associated with the City's gravity sewer system include the age of the system, improper construction
or settlement,penetration by tree roots, and grease buildup.
The 23 lift stations operated by the City pose a different kind of reliability problem. Unlike gravity sewers, lift
stations are subject to power and mechanical failures, and thus are less reliable. They also require higher
maintenance and operation costs and cause increased adverse impacts on downstream facilities. Some lift
stations are in need of replacement because of age and deterioration. Other stations are in good shape,
however, they lack some of the safety or reliability features required under current codes.
XII-12
� n
� �
< y
� K
~ O
0
--`—�J -----,�-� , _ -h � � "'�.�
'LL� A CrJ
_ __,
� `�` Figure 3-1 �
�°� o
COQ CREEK ��l Z
WATER 8 SEWER DIST. % �
� � y
�
�,., ._.___-.. -- .,�-���, -7 SANITARY SEWER y
`"` -------__, ___�_� r�
__ _ SERVICE AREA �
��� - AND ADJACENT �
�``` `�� -----` � � DISTRICT �
! �
� �i- - ---�,, BOUNDARIES � z
,' y
` _ �
-- �
SKYWAY WATER d �-----_ ,_ �
SEWER DIST.�� �
; �� ❑ Metro Trunk Lines �
� �.�a„ , �
- ' City of Renton Interceptors �
X � * � - - -- - ,�,s OrU
C
'� ('� ►ti
� A
`� ,,,rrr Metro's East Division � w
� Reclamation Plant � ►�-+
• `' .....,�,
O
'::� ` -------- City Limits �
•-_-s;= .,...,.,,
�v' ,.;�. ------- Urban Growth Boundary ��„
�� �� .�:�;• ��
. . �-.�.
•,.,:� -.,,�.�.�,
� .,,e,�,,,�.
; ,.�.;�:, ��
� � � -----, .. Adjacent District Boundary y
� i am _� -—- --- -- -_
�,_ __::�_;-,�.DF � CEDAR RIVER
- ,�_, ?��� . WATERAND �-_'-� ' City of Renton Sanitary Sewer �
' m�n+�i 3 SEWER DIST. �
�;:, � , x ,a,,,,,„ `'��, Service Area d
'� x� `F H
'�'�t ,.•.� �� � -� ------------- - __ - , �S. � z
il •i S SCREE� n
i� � � a� i w TeRnNo �� O 6000 t�
, ;
�;-' ; ,_' ' s R oisrnicr ''
„ � l, ;' , ,.�,,,, ----------' � � 12000 z
,,!'�.,�, ---' o'� � ' ' � � �^'m�, o
., �! KENT � - S � .�wa 1.72�000 �+A I '
mw�a ` ' �
j � o �
i
� : ' � ��eMmuwu ' i �xwru �� ��'__
___ � Note: For gxaphic presentation on,y �
, , � , - ,
, rt; ,_______� D _
:��
,% ,.: j � ---� _
Facilities are not to scale. �
� -�---- -------- .;;�\ "`••"""` D ti� o�, LONG RANGE PLANNING
; ' �' /` � ----------�--- ��j
�
—-- -- -_- -- ------- �-- ' - - � '`7� '
R,MacOnie,D.Visneski,D.Ellis
�;i`; �� �� �F T O$ 20 September 2004
� ;, I
7�7 n li
< y
� �
" _- -__ -_, _�� � � _ _� C O
- _ _ .:=,�,F t �' �'J\�� �� � ►�
_ __,_��v_- _ �Rc� _..4�,>_ ��, � Fi ure 3-2 A r�
:.:..:..::.::..�:::_- - -- _- � g z
_ ` -- ISLAND _- _ = `�� � � �„3
---- - - - NEWCAS
- - - �
- '_ -_ nY=':�S�.g.�y';- _,-s'�.'43�ie:'$. l �
_ _ i:'<.:�aws�".�,:.E:�':x. `"¢.- - �\ � ,S '�',
_ '.':'#;'; ' _ '_..'.R°.�`'- '�`u"'Ei.".-Y::; �� A
...:..:......:.:..:... .:..::.:.:.. ��::`:.<.,�:_.;::: � — J �HFR� C
- - o
- ___ _ _ .- _ _ -_ _ __ __ _ '_' ' _ �_ • '"Gy,e, ry.i
, - _---- - - - .< SAN
- ; � ITARY W
_ - � U SE ER
- -�— - -- - - ><ft��=<> - _:�:�>:r::z:> :`, .F
_<;�r;��.:=::::�::::z:;=_ _..:.�.�.f_= - }, N� r
___- -- -__ ° - - = - -2�:xN< , ,� ,e �
- -- - -- � _ — � TRUNK LINES �
��: _ _ _ _ ��:::::::;_�:�_:_�-__ _ _ _- , � �_ �� �,
-' - -:.,�;,��-F~ "�° a�
- =- _�tz>;r;== =i:<:�:�:�-':::�_��=�:,v�::.:. v�
___ --- _-- _ `$:=- -: _-__ {I�� , � r�
SEA'�TLE - _ _ --- 1 Crr1
_. _ _ -_ - � �
- - "`s�`
� ::;:s:s:t>`.#:;#:'�
fl � _ -t� _ �;%�t_.. � �-�i
r —`�i�� --__~...:...... .. . � ; - _ -—- '� z
j _ ''• � \ `3
. .
� ,..
, --.:,
�— J� i._. _ ( `r, �0 ' I - `---- _� , � Lift Stations �
� � � 1 �i §, � � \ C
�
' 3� � � ---�- Metro Trunk Lines *
1,� � o ! I `i i � I �R'
�i � � � ' ' ' C f Renton Inte
•.,,
� . ,_;. - --
. , •'e.s � ; --------- �' P ors
. ...,,. -- -
%� <�,� ; i o rce t
�'� \ •`,.. --=� -�----- -------- v� '�,1'J.
>G � - ,< �-- � P' � __ _ � � �
� ' n. I � Metro's East Division � `Y
A � _ �� � Y�`, Reclamation Plant H w
;,.�
" � � �
`„s � --- � ,ti' ; �.�..� � ta
`'i� � ,�� �.�,M, '.7
':'?m - � �_ �` — — — City Limits x'
,�
�•.,
:•..
,, ,,,. _ �., ; - — - Urban Growth Boundary C"
�. ,..,.,--
::,.,�.._�_�:,. �
., , ,.,._:.� ��f �. C7
w �
,
::
'`;�;�''�"�-."`f' :.. c e - _. _ ______ ----- - phere of Influence ��„
_ I , � `'„�,.� I �'i l� r ".� _------ - S
��; '; , \ ,� 'ru,uromi J
� ''�—'-',o�,.�I b' � j"�. ��
(� : ' %:� _ �
�_�'y TC�KV`�I�,IL � I 7���4';,"�� � � d
;
�
:� -. _
� ;.. t; <,j
;� ..
� , —
,
;
.` ��, � ! a• ' � —-- -- -- �-' '- �
� �
. . � ""'"—�.f..____ ,
, r . .;
�?
�,:,rv.�.
-'-:'-' '� F' �- 1 I '7.�
�'�� �� f, ' �,�o� )�� � 6��� 12��� �
;i , , �,�' . ' , — — — — � � � � ��«� �
���J �' ' , 4c' _' � I \ �� � Z
'� KENT �` � o ' � \ .rwa 1:72,��00 ,A �
' � � __ _� '""°r`"'� �� Note: For graphic presentation only �
'..,��,..
_ � i �� �_ r_ Facilities are not to scale. �
x; I ...,-:•"� —
' � "'"`"""""` D � ti� O,i, LONG RANGE PLANNING �
. : i ';::N�.,� .
' � t r°'--1------:------------- '
. .
I ' � , ' � -_ '_1 _
f, ' ♦O♦
- — -"-- -----+----
-- + --!n",�--
� � - -J '' R.MacOnie,D.Visneski,D.Ellis
�y � �$'N O� 20Septembcr2004
r ,
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/O1/04
Forecasted Conditions
Future Capacity of Facilities
The wastewater collection system currently has no capacity restraints. However, continued development within
the Lake Washington East Basin will require that additional capacity be provided by means of the Sunset
Interceptor. These improvements are currently scheduled in the Wastewater Six-year Capital Improvement
Program. The most significant amount of increased flow is anticipated to occur in the East Cedar River Basin.
Sufficient capacity exists within this basin to accommodate this anticipated growth due to the construction of
the East Renton Interceptor in the mid-1990s.
Significant additional growth will also continue to occur within the West Cedar River,Black River, and Lake
Washington West Basins. The current modeling of the system shows sufficient capacity to accommodate this
growth as well. The utility is currently developing a new hydraulic model to update its modeling to fit recently
completed flow analysis performed system wide as part of King County's Regional Inflow and Infiltration
Study, scheduled for completion in early 2005. This update to the program will help the utility to better
understand what, if any, additional capacity restraints may exist within its system.
The City of Renton has several agreements with adjacent utilities that allow joint use of facilities within the
City. Adjacent utility systems' comprehensive plans predict the future capacity they will need when they
convey wastewater through Renton. However, adjustments to the City's interceptors may need to be made as
these systems further clarify their needs. While these agreements restrict the volume of wastewater discharged
to the joint use facilities, if wastewater flows from adjacent upstream utilities exceed the agreed upon flows,
then capacity problems could occur.
Reduction of inflow and infiltration in Renton's collection system will help to make additional capacity
available for anticipated growth and development. This will also reduce King County's need to make expensive
additions or improvements to increase the capacity of their treatment and conveyance facilities.
King County's adopted wastewater plan,based on Puget Sound Regional Council population and employment
projections, includes system improvements necessary to meet service levels in the area served by the regional
wastewater conveyance system and treatment plant in Renton.
Future System Reliability-City of Renton
If proper attention is paid to the on-going inspection,maintenance,rehabilitation, and replacement of City
mains,the reliability of Renton's sewer system is expected to remain at an adequate level.
A significant portion of the City's wastewater collection and conveyance system is over fifty years old. The
materials used for sewers at the time these were installed are expected to have a useful life of approximately
fifty years. Some of these mains are in an elevated need of repair and are ranked high in priority in Renton's 20-
year Capital Improvement Program(CIP). The old mains are continually being inspected to determine which
ones will need to be replaced during the second half of the 20-year CIP. Not all the fifty-plus year old mains
are in the 20-year CIP. Continual evaluation of these facilities may indicate the need to re-prioritize CIP
projects and dictate the advancement of some programs to ensure the integrity of the system. The 2005 update
of the Wastewater Long-Range Management Plan will further evaluate the priority of replacements.
Proposed sewer projects are ranked according to a prioritization process based on defined needs. The ranking
system, at this time, includes categories that give points for improving substandard or deteriorating facilities,
increasing the efficiency of the system, and protecting the environment.
XII-15
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/O1/04
Objective U-E: Provide and maintain a sanitary sewer collection system that is consistent with the public
health and water quality objectives of the State of Washington and the City of Renton.
Policy U-55. Ensure and encourage the use of the Policy U-64. The City of Renton will follow state
sanitary sewer system within urban areas in a guidelines that define a City's ability to assume
manner consistent with land use and environmental fa�ilities in annexation areas.
protection goals and policies.
Policy U-65. Areas annexed without existing
1'olicy U-56. All new developments should be municipal sanitary sewer service will be served by
required to connect to the sanitary sewer system, Renton unless a service agreement exists or is
except low-density single-family residential negotiated with a neighboring utility.
development located away from environmentally �
sensitive areas, outside of Aquifer Protection Policy U-66. Areas annexed with existing sanitary
Areas, and having adequate soils to support on-site sewer service must meet the City's sanitary sewer
septic systems. service objectives. Upgrading to City standards of
sanitary sewer facilities within all or portions of
Policy U-57. Sewer connections should be newly annexed areas will be required if there is a
provided in presently unsewered areas if the areas, threat to public health and safety. If improvements
by remaining unsewered,pose a health hazard to are necessary, they may be accomplished by
the aquifer, or if other groundwater contamination developer installation or LID as a condition of the
occurs. annexation.
Policy U-58. Adequate sewer service capacity Policy U-67. All property owners in
should be assured prior to the approval of any new unincorporated King County and Renton's PAA,
developinent application(e.g. short plat, long plat, who are granted City sanitary sewer services,
multifamily, commercial, and industrial should be required to sign a covenant to annex.
development).
Policy U-68. In areas where annexation is logical,
Policy U-59. Sewer service should be expanded so extensions of service may be contingent upon
that the current levels of service are maintained request far annexation. (See Annexation policies in
through build-out of the adopted land use the Land Use Element.)
classifications.
Policy U-69. Allow the extension of sanitary sewer
Policy U-60. Excess sewer capacity alone should services within the City's Potential Annexation
not be sufficient grounds for challenging the Area according to such criteria as the City may
existing zoning for an area. require. Sanitary sewer services will not be
established within another sewer service district,
Policy U-61. Coardinate with the regional which provides sanitary sewer service except by
wastewater agency and adjacent jurisdictions in the agreement with that sewer service district.
planning and maintenance of regional wastewater
systems in and near the City. Policy U-70. The City may assume existing
portions of adjacent sanitary sewer systems, at the
Policy U-62. Development should be conditioned discretion of the City Council, when such
on the orderly and timely provision of sanitary assumptions promote the logical and efficient
sewers. development of the City's sanitary sewer system
area.
Policy U-63. Coordinate with the regional
wastewater agency and adjacent jurisdictions to Policy U-71. The City Council will consider
ensure that wastewater lines passing through annexations without assumptions of existing
Renton are operated in a safe manner at all times. sanitary sewer facilities under conditions defined in
the Long Range Wastewater Management Plan.
XII-16
C[TY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. l 1/O 1/04
Policy U-72. Actively promote all residents within county, and state regulations and when public
the City to connect to public sewer. sewers are not available.
Policy U-73. Private sewage disposal systems will
be allowed within the City limits, subject to city,
Surface Water
Discussion: Natural hydrologic systerns play an integral role in effective surface water management.
Engineering techniques can control mucla of the storm water through detention and retention systems.
However, the cu»aulative effects of storm water can only be managed by a combination of engineering and
preservation of natural systerns.
Surface water can dissolve and transport toxins from the human environment as well as carrying eroded
materials. Renton's municipal water supply, as well as downstream water bodies, must be protected frorn
water-borne contaminates through prudent management practices.
Existing Conditions
Renton's Surface Water Utility was organized to meet specific ordinances,regulations and to ensure that planned
facilities meet defined engineering standards. The Utility is operated as a self-supporting utility under the direction
of the Mayor and City Council.
Utility Service Area
The Utility's service area currently includes all lands within the City boundaries,more than 17.2 square miles.
However, surface flows from the urban area within the Potential Annexation Area(PAA)and the rural area also
affect the natural and constructed surface water management systems. This potential annexation area is currently
serviced by King County. As areas within the PAA are annexed into the City,Renton will assume responsibility to
provide surface water management services within the annexed areas.
General Location of Facilities
The existing surface and storm water facilities follow natural drainage patterns wherein surface water is collected
and detained to reduce peak runoff rates, to provide water quality improvement, and for infiltration. Alternatively, it
is conveyed through pipes to numerous surface water bodies. These surface water bodies include several creeks and
rivers, and Lake Washington.
The majar topographic elements of the service area include several major drainage areas or basins within the city
limits (see Figure 4-1). The northern-most basin is the May Creek Basin,which begins northeast of the city limits
and flows to Lake Washington. The Cedar River Basin runs through the heart of downtown Renton. This basin
extends far beyond the city boundaries. Thus,hydrologic events and urban growth beyond the city limits may have a
significant impact upon the surface drainage system,particularly near downtown and the outfall into Lake
Washington. The facilities within the city limits for these basins include storm sewers, detention facilities,open
channels, and other protective works.
The Black River Basin, also know as the Eastside Green River Watershed(ESGRW), is a major basin in the
southwestern portion of the City. The basin encompasses approximately 24 square miles that includes areas of Kent,
Tukwila, and King County. Thus, coordination with other agencies in this area is essential. The City of Renton
makes up less than one third of the total basin area. The facilities within the city limits for this basin include the
XII-17
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/O1/04
Black River Pump Station, Springbrook Creek(P-1 channel), storm sewers, detention facilities, open channels,and
other protective works.
The remaining basins within the city limits include the West Hill Basin,which drains to Lake Washington,the
Lower Empire Sub-basin in the Duwamish Basin, which drains to the Green/Duwamish River and the Soos Creek
Basin. The Soos Creek Basin is primarily outside of the city limits.
Basin plans for the Black River Basin,the Maplewood Sub-basin,the Cedar River Basin(with King County), and
the May Creek Basin(with King County)have been completed and actions identified in these plans are being
implemented.
Existiitg Capacity of Facilities
The existing surface water drainage system is meeting capacity requirements under normal conditions. However, in
some areas of the City,the system has become inadequate to serve present needs during large, infrequent storm
events.
Of particular concern are inadequate facilities located within sc;veral basins. These basins are each affected by
upstream development activities that have occurred in their respective watersheds, creating downstream capacity
deficiencies.
Currently there are no special efforts for floodway protection outside of the development review process and
emergency responses during flooding. The City is studying frequently flooded areas including the Cedar River,
North Renton, and the Black River Basin.
Problems in the Black River Basin include widespread flooding or surface water ponding in the valley during severe
rainfall events and the loss of outlet culvert capacity from the Panther Creek Wetlands. Existing and future surface
water quality issues, loss of wetland habitat and fishery passage problems are additional concerns,with the
continued development of the upstream portion of the watershed within Renton's Urban Growth Area and areas
within the Cities of Kent and Tukwila.
XII-18
� n
� �
< y
�. ■C
`"' O
0
.. '�1
A ti7
�
H
�
z
;::.. ..>.....,,� ..;�..,a BEIIEVUE --- _� y -
Y� . - i :�' '�"i
`'� � �_ r~-"�-�'-� ,� I�',_C.r- �`J � r
.�_�;�-.,`J,� _�� i ISSA �
1=l y
�,
MERGE „ �-. -, Figure �-1 �
IS u�a soRrn � �t �
N E �
:., � r
- � �_____� �..�:�.,. � �' 3
�, �; ����;����� �{ ` SURFACE WATER �
"" � ""r`"°°` ~ ' DRAINAGE BASINS z
.� �'� ; y
� �
� � �,� L.
': ! V]
SE E� , � i �
s ^ + � J ,,,w,
� � A�
� � g ' t�e
\� Mldi i�' � j
�'� UXE N'Ad! "� � � �� . �
� % � • G U A8 OFdF � � , _ �.� I �'\. r�y, �
� � � I- � I ' i � Uq
�O SN a ' �o � �
7 � � � � �
``` O ui 1 � _._._ \ � �
4 I Yt.OYKT � � �' , `\.� . � M+
L
�.'' r• 1
pwral I� � ' � , �,
{
♦ � 1/ � �
��` \— LIIR KIT1fLLl. GaRf NACOONALD� Major Basin Boundary �
� �., J`' �i � BASMS Major Basin Nomes
. ���',l. _,-=.--+- , m� '\ `�� .� �`^�''� � i � Sub-Basin Boundary �.
� ___��xa__ Sub-8oundar Names L7
_ ua i i %"�'� �
•�ou+w •-\.�, �-� � �`'��''�,.. '�'^+,,�.,� � y y
� i +w_ _ �„ � 1 x u�c�¢�,4�y; " --- City Limits
�1•, . �
� � 'v / �a \� � Urbon Growth Boundary �
YAt4[1 ' ..�._._.._.._.._.._.._,_
J�I ; � � L � � ;� � � • Sphere of Influence �
�?e
i� . � � ! � � � � L.�`- ---� I �a ;,�� z
r �' ! � i i :/ J� .�1-- --t=-- -- - � �1 ;z �----, ',`( ; 5000 10000
, ' � : -..- ' — '
�
.. ..
`�. • i � � ; -� ' i , �.--•--' + 1� � �� , �
LOM'ER•CFDAR RIYpf �� z
� "� .7' �M i `�I I •'. '� -- I� �/Li'S O[.�'IRR. I� �� ` \J
� � � ' l � ""_-'-_-:r-+'� �' < � �+, , [rJ
y ____ �� , � r �� '�, �� \ Note: For graphic presentation only.
I I ' — � ` �,` �
' , % � �3>; '� Feeilities are not to scale. 7-+
i KENT � i __ —�� I '�, � ' SYrtLYG Llkf `�, O
\ `! � ���.1 � �# �
wr"' x.�or uea LONG RANGE PLAYNING •
� owMa.e_ ���-�'?.�`.(`•• :
- / i y I 'I `� '�`'� 5003 CREl1( , (. , � � _ .. :19 F.p[UF IYFryA�M.YCP � O.Denniaon (J7
�,� '.I. � `�,�rn cu�� .,r�"� � •'•_� "�^�-----'-��� � * � R.MacOnie, D.Vinneeki �
i
i '
r I , 1 . " ' e u:rea ��•� . 24 Mareh 1995 �
3 1--'- ._ . ._ . . � ur ro
i i / "i _...'„"�."'i.-.�.-�i , .. , '''.""'.._..� �
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/O1/04
Other areas within the City with surface water problems include much of the Downtown and Rolling Hills vicinities.
Storm drain facilities in areas along SW 7th Street,near the Renton Center, and Renton Village are over capacity
during severe storm events causing flooding of facilities that are undersized for current flows from their tributary
uplands.
North of Downtown,both the Gypsy Creek and the North Renton Basins experience flooding caused, in part,by
inadequately sized pipes, ditches and detention facilities. Flooding in the Gypsy Creek Basin is associated with
facilities located near an interchange of I-405. Flooding in the lower portion of North Renton is largely caused by
the system not being able to convey drainage from the Highlands neighborhood.
Existing Reliability
To a large extent, the reliability of the storm drainage system depends on three factors. In areas where growth has
occurred, or will occur, the facilities must be designed to control the flows that are discharged from new
development to pre-developed conditions(detention),and conveyance systems that are sized to convey the increased
storm water runoff due to future land use conditions. Additionally the facilities require regular maintenance to
prevent debris and blockage,that impair the system's ability to function properly, and routine observation to ensure
they operate as designed during high flows. Thus,reliability is a function of proper sizing of storm water
conveyance systems and flow control systems, along with the need for routine maintenance and replacement of these
storm water management systems.
City facilities in the lower reaches of several watersheds no longer meet the capacity requirements and,in some
instances,may not have been maintained on a regular basis. Thus,they may not be considered reliable. As part of
the Surface Water Utility System Plan, a Capital Improvement Program(CIP)has been developed to solve drainage
problems and improve reliability. The Surface Water Utility System Plan also identifies maintenance and operation
programs that are funded by the Utility to maintain public storm systems and address surface water management
problems in the City. The Surface Water Utility has identified needed improvements through the basin plans. The
current Surface Water Utility Six-year CIP is provided in the City Capital Improvement Program document.
Surface Water Qa�aliry aiad Qua�ltiry Best Managen:ent Practices to be Implemented to
Mitigate Future Land Use Lnpacts
The City adopts surface water management design standards that require the implementation of storm water quantity
and quality Best Management Practices (BMPs)and controls as part of the approval of a project to mitigate the
project's storm and surface water impacts during and after construction. These standards include erosion and
sedimentation BMPs during construction, flow control,water quality treatment, and conveyance system sizing
standards to manage the quantity and quality of storm water runoff from projects. The City has adopted the 1990
King County Surface Water Design Manual as the design standard that projects must comply with to mitigate
impacts to surface water. However, as a condition of Environmental Review under the State Environmental Policy
Act(SEPA),projects are conditioned to comply with the standards in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design
Manual in certain parts of the City. The Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual
for Western Washington(August 2001)also provides design standards and BMPs to mitigate impacts to surface
water from new and redevelopment projects.
The City of Renton is a Phase 2 community under the Clean Water Act National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)Program far Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems. The NPDES program is intended to
protect water quality from non-point source pollution from stormwater runof£ City will be required to obtain a
NPDES Phase 2 stormwater permit from Ecology for its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in 2005, once
Ecology completes development of the permit. The NPDES Phase 2 stormwater program requires the
implementation of the following six minimum control measures:
XII-20
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/O 1/04
1. Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts
2. Public Involvement/Participation
3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
5. Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment
6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
The Surface Water Utility currently implements these six minimum control measures to some degree. It is expected
that the NPDES Phase 2 stormwater pertnit will require some expansion of these programs and the adoption of new
design standards for construction projects that are equivalent to the standards in the Ecology 2001 Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington.
The City has adopted wetland, stream buffer, steep slope, and flood hazard critical area ordinances, shoreline
regulations and other development regulations that also protect surface water systems. The listing of Chinook
salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act will require additional stormwater controls and
strengthening of Critical Area Ordinances,updates to development regulations, and land use changes that will
further reduce future land use impacts on streams,rivers, lakes, and wetlands in the City.
The City currently operates a storm system maintenance program that includes cleaning catch basins,pipes and other
facilities, along with a street vacuum sweeping program. The rnaintenance programs remove sediment and
pollutants from City-owned and operated storm systems and streets,which reduces flooding and non-point source
pollution from being discharged into water bodies in the City.
Forecasted Conditions
Ftrtccre Utility Service Area
The Utility's Service Area could enlarge substantially to approximately 35 square miles if the City of Renton
annexes all areas within the Urban Growth Area. The areas that may be annexed are currently served by King
County facilities. The City, upon annexation,would assume these facilities,their upkeep, and maintenance.
General Locatiox of Future Facilities
The Renton surface and storm water system currently operates much like the gravity-based sewer system, although
the destination is surface water bodies,rather than wastewater treatment plants. Storm and surface water facilities
will generally remain in their current locations, although the individual sections may be replaced to convey higher
flows.
For new development, surface water facilities are usually constructed on a site-by-site basis,rather than on a
comprehensive or system-wide basis. Storm water pipes and detention facilities will be constructed on-site during
each construction project, and the off-site release rates should be limited to rates no greater than pre-development
levels,per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Most existing and new storm conveyance systems are
constructed in public or private streets.
Although peak flows are required to be regulated to pre-development levels,total volumes of flow will increase due
to the increase in impervious area. New development may create negative downstream impacts although the
development had complied with storm water controls and requirements due to the increase in runoff volume. The
total volume of runoff will increase in all areas of new development,which may increase erosion and sedimentation
and decrease surface water quality.
XII-21
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.l 1/O1/04
The unincorporated urban area has existing storm water conveyance systems that are planned and administered by
King County. The County land use plans for these areas are similar to the Renton plan. Since the King County
facilities are designed with the same standards as City facilities,they function the same as City facilities.
Future Capacity of Facilities
Many of the existing facilities within the city limits will require modifications to increase capacity to provide
adequate conveyance capacity and flow control(detention). All facilities would be sized to provide flow control and
water quality treatment in accordance with the adopted city surface water design standards. Stormwater conveyance
systems are required to convey storm flows from the twenty-five year or greater design storm event. New
development is required to detain flows on-site in accordance with the adopted surface water design standards and to
discharge the post construction runoff at rates no greater than pre-developed runoff rates.
Basin plans will be prepared to determine need for and sizes of'new regional drainage facilities. Several basin
plans have been prepared and the City is also participating in regional salmon conservation planning within
Water Resource Inventory Areas(WRIA) 8 and 9. As the City annexes new areas within unincorporated King
County additional basin/sub-basin planning will be needed. In addition,the Surface Water Utility System Plan
will be updated and will comprehensively define resources, standards, and programs needed to effectively
manage storm and surface water runoff in the City and potential annexation areas.
The anticipated increase in impervious surface in all areas will increase surface runoff and require new facilities at
development sites. In addition,new development,particularly infill development,may increase surface flows
beyond existing facility capacity,requiring the enlargement of facilities downstream of the development. City
standards require that new development mitigate for impacts to surface water by releasing runoff from the site at a
rate no greater than the pre-developed runoff rate. Also, if downstream problems exist,new development is required
to perform offsite analysis to ensure that the downstream problem is not made worse by the development.
Surface Water Quality Reqtciremeiits in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 1, Zone 1 Modified, and 2
Development projects located in either Zone 1,Zone 1 Modified,or Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area(APA)
are required to pass additional City review to ensure the projects do not produce water quantity and/or quality
impacts that may affect the aquifer,which is used for the City's potable water supply. Areas of particular concern
include areas subject to vehicular traffic or the starage of chemicals.
The adopted Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan proposes areas for development of more intensive land
uses by the year 2022. This includes substantial development and redevelopment of the Downtown. Portions of this
area are within Zone 1 of Renton's APA. Zone 1 requirements include closed detention facilities including wet
vaults on site, and pipe conveyance systems that meet pipeline specifications to prevent infiltration of storm water
from these systems.
APA Zone 2 and Zone 1 Modified requirements affect much of the northern and eastern portions of Renton.
These requirements are not as stringent as Zone 1 requirements and generally require lining of conveyance
system and water quality facilities to protect groundwater in areas with relatively porous soil. The APA
regulations may increase the potential surface and storm flows generated from both zones, especially in Zone l,
since infiltration systems are not allowed. The increase in runoff may require existing facilities to be enlarged
to meet the increased capacity need.
Objective U-F: Provide and maintain surface water management systems to minimize impacts on natural
systems and to protect the public,property, surface water bodies, fish habitat, and groundwater from changes in
the quantity and quality of storm water runoff due to land use changes.
XII-22
CITY OF RENTON UTiLITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/O1/04
Policy U-74. Design storm drainage systems to swales, clean roof run-off, and groundwater
minimize potential erosion and sedimentation recharge technologies to reduce the volume of
problems, and to preserve natural drainage systems surface water run-off,to recharge aquifers,and to
including rivers, streams, flood plains, lakes,ponds, support base flows in streams for aquatic resources.
and wetlands.
Policy U-79. Work towards protecting surface
Policy U-75. Encourage the retention of natural water resources and groundwater resources from
vegetation along lakes,ponds,rivers, and streams, pollutants entering via the storm drainage system.
where appropriate, in order to help preserve water
quality,protect fishery resources, and control Policy U-80.Implement stormwater standards that
erosion and runoff. adequately control flow(quantity) and quality of
stormwater runoff from new and redevelopment
Policy U-76. Filling, culverting, and piping of projects to protect public health and safety,prevent
natural watercourses that are classified as streams property damage,prevent erosion, and protect
shall not be allowed, except as needed for a public surface water quality, groundwater quality, and�sh
works project. In the case where a public works habitat.
project requires the filling, culverting, or piping of
a natural watercourse, if no other option is Policy U-81. Coordinate with adjacent cities,
available, then such projects should follow specific counties, and state and federal agencies in the
design standards to minimize impacts to the natural development and implementation of the Clean
watercourse. Such standards should prevent Water Act's National Pollution Eliminating System
flooding and the degradation of water quality, Phase 2 Permit for Municipal Separate Storm
aquatic habitat, and the effectiveness of the local Sewer Systems.
natural drainage system. This would include
providing mitigation to replace the lost functions Policy U-82. Existing natural drainage,
provided by the natural watercourse that is�lled, watercourses,ravines, and other similar land
culverted, or piped by the public works project. features should be protected from the adverse
effects of erosion from increased storm water
Policy U-77. Promote and support public runoff.
education and involvement programs that address
surface water quality and other surface water Policy U-83. Storm and surface water management
management issues. programs should be coordinated with adjacent local
and regional jurisdictions.
Policy U-78. Encourage the safe and appropriate
use of detention and retention ponds,biofiltration Policy U-84. Reserve.
Solid Waste
Discussion: These policies support the provision of adequate iind safe waste handling and disposal facilities.
In addition, tliese policies support active recycling efforts aimed at extending the life cycle of these facilities
Existing Conditions
Utility Service Area
Solid waste collection within the city limits is mandated by state and city code an�only the City's contractor
may provide such service. The City sets rates for solid waste collection, and bills all customers directly for
XII-23
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/Ol/04
these services. The City contracts with Waste Management-Rainier for all solid waste collection within the city
limits.
State law also gives Renton the authority to contract for collection of residential recyclables and yard waste.
Curbside collection of recyclables is available to all single-farrzily and duplex residents of the City, and onsite
collection is available to all multi-family and duplex residents fourplex and above). Yard waste collection is
available to all single-family and duplex residents with the exception of mobile home park residents. Yard
waste collection may be available to multi-family and mobile home residents for an additional fee. Waste
Management, Inc. provides collection containers for all of these programs. The recycling and yard waste
collection programs are voluntary. The City contracts with Waste Management, Inc. for these services.
Coordinatio�z with Other Solid Waste Purveyors
Through an interlocal agreement with King County,the County's disposal system handles all solid waste
generated within city limits, except solid waste diverted by waste reduction or recycling activities. King
County regulates the types of waste accepted at its facilities as well as the disposal rates.Renton's interlocal
agreement with King County also authorizes the County to prepare the Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan and to include the City in the Plan. The County achieved its 1995 goal of fifty percent(50%)
waste reduction and recycling under the Plan.
Renton works cooperatively with other jurisdictions in the region to implement the Local Hazardous Waste
Management Plan(LHWMP). Participants in the LHWMP include thirty-eight(38) suburban cities,the City of
Seattle,King County Solid Waste Division,King County Water and Land Division, and the Department of
Public Health, Seattle-King County. The LHWMP provides a regional program to manage hazardous waste
generated in small quantities by households and businesses in King County. To provide funding for the
LHWMP,the City of Renton and all other solid waste and sewer service providers in King County, collect
hazardous waste fees from customers through utility bills.
XII-24
� � i
� ��
` o
� �
�
� ��
�
�
0
- . . _ z
,.:v.,;..,_•".:'. 4=:`...' , \-:j BEI.LEWE Y'-ro �� � �-+-+
�
,l � r......._�.f..�y � � �,xJ l.J \ — �
� � � �� 1 �� r
4__.�.," .� '%`� 1 ►r
s .. � ` � i
-�-``._ �,� ` '_' �.-- - Figure 5-1.. �
NIERCE y� c�.rt mars u .�� C�/�
� `-+ � NEWC E I `-�i �
� g r' .�
� � —.� `.,.. ■
; �°r� �� ; St�LfD WASTE �
�_ �� � -.� °�;� ��a ` FACILITIES y
� � . ;� ; \
�� � n i
5E E �r, �, i
� �i�i.� , ' F �,,.
r—` "� � � —f� ti � i �,
� _� �1:�—�—,z1 > ° p.
� �--••.. �
� �
�- � �� `
`` ' � �
' �* -s
� � � .��_.� � .. �:EME+EMf nP . ' ` � .', � �
r=y �\ ,R r�—.r-� � '�\ \�.
N �` 4rs. ' . O �'� j ._ ^—� \,"J ``� � GCdor HiliB Landfill -... � �
ti'r '„� L ._. `^i � � Fr
� �' Rentan Transfer Station �
��_ i �� j ' O
�— � LIA'd YACOOMALL� A
� � ' � C � \ �Al11:�T1lLR6. ( � 61ack River Construction, Demolition �
\ j� '�.yp� �
_ �� t--t �f-�„r� �� ; and Land Ciearing Transfer Station
,',1� �`��. ^•_o-.n.1 _
� /� t�� �'
� i r_J ` ""*.^�~�",�>,:,,,: ,..�� i '--------- City Limits !
- t` � ? \ _../ ��"--.r '� �'"`-1'�-_,_.�.,F�rvu�?�'-�-.� � _._._._._._._ Urban Growth 8oundary �
YI � � �-_ ,�- � ,r,= i� '� - - - -- d
l � - Sphere of Influence
, I ` �� � H
'� �,,; � } a — -----� � I� j 1 R z
�t -r
�� � ti.. `, i I � 2 I
� � !� i � I �I ' 't , I �' � O 5000 10004 �'
� �, r —� f , �
r� I � I' � —�f -- -- ''— �-:`,�. L——� ' i �...} ` �� ,
,..��_, � ! �__ '__;_� - ; ;� . � , .�,�,,_ � r L1�Y.OL.YIF[ � }ey
, _ __ � '.".�.V ', i � t—.�
,1 ��'�� ; � , ' ":I ----�— `.�' . � c .
�"� � Note: For ra h' y.
r- � _.� ` � rc resentation onl
� �._._._._ ! .:±. 9 P P r�
� �'-'� Focilities are not to scole.
I �` h i �.�: �'\ Q I
� -� � � � -I � \ ; �� .
,��. `` r i ��- + ,.r�,�,�.��a
!" t. �� �'' - `
1 ! 1 ��1 �\ � I v� E..:',: \ .,tll.lor NR.t �
� KENT �� �: � f.. T �� LpNG RANGE PLANNING
,�R � t 4' �w _ i � t�� � \�� i . O.Denniaan �
i� i i, i'L__.,.' '- '�� , f; f ' � � _ { ���L•io=o��is�u�•�,are +� + R.MacOnie� D.Vianeaki , C�
'c'I i i t-y J .. 1 24 March 1995 �)
Y � { � ;.l'iHTttFq 1.�A'R ` ,f � l \ �/ry
J � \.l " � , (.ICR 1»U�'4Y 1� � ' �,yr
r � ..,`_' . ^ 1 _._ � ._. . . I .."J�' .
; } . : �� _ r� ����Y._-'�"--• . ' r• _ _ _ _ -') . ` � .
' -. .._ I. . _ I .'. , �" � �
CITY OF RENTON UTILiTIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/Ol/04
Regional Solid Waste Purveyors witliin the City Limits
The King County Solid Waste Division owns and operates the Renton Transfer Station in the 3000 block of NE
4th Street in the Renton Highlands neighborhood. Local waste haulers and residents of unincorporated King
County who haul their own waste use this facility. City residents also use this facility for disposal of large and
bulky items.
Due to state legislation and Washington Utilities and Trade Commission(WUTC)regulations, the City does not
have the authority to contract exclusively for collection of recyclable materials generated by businesses.
However, a number of private companies do collect recyclables from businesses in Renton.
Location and Capacity of Existing Solid Waste Facilities
Figure 5-1 illustrates the location of the transfer station, land�ll, and construction, demolition,and land clearing
(CDL)transfer facility within the City's Planning Area. King County's Renton Transfer Station is located in
the Renton Highlands. A majority of the solid waste generated in Renton is transported there by the City's
contractor,Waste Management, Inc. A majority of the vehicles that utilize the Transfer Station are garbage
trucks from waste hauling companies.
Regional Disposal's Black River Transfer and Recycling Center(a Rabanco facility), located at 501 Monster
Road SW, opened in late 1993. Under a contract with King County,this facility accepts construction,
demolition, and land clearing waste. The facility received 89,300 tons of CDL material in 1999. There is no
data on the amount of CDL processed at construction sites and hauled directly to a processor. Therefore,it is
difficult to determine the amount of CDL waste being diverted from the facility.
The City of Renton recognizes that the Mt. Olivet Landfill (closed 1991)was not closed in accordance with
State of Washington closure standards. Areas of deficiency include excessively steep slopes, lack of adequate
capping,possible negative environmental consequences, failure to obtain an approved closure plan and other
related deficiencies. The City continues to monitor groundwater quality in the vicinity of the landfill to assure
that potential contaminants do not enter the City's drinking water aquifer. If contamination is detected,the City
has contingency measures to address this problem, such as selective operation of the City's eight wells and
groundwater pumping to remove contaminants. Identified areas of contamination would be monitored until the
contaminants are removed.
King County's Cedar Hill Landfill, owned and operated by the King County Solid Waste Division, and located
southeast of Renton, will continue to receive all solid waste generated in the City of Renton. This facility's
remaining permitted capacity is approximately 12.5 million tons(as of January 2000). At the current level of
fifty percent(50%)waste reduction and recycling, Cedar Hills will be able to accept solid waste until 2012.
Recyclables collected from single family, duplex, and multi-family residents in the City are taken to Waste
Management,Inc.'s Cascade Recycling Center in Woodinville,WA.
Yard waste for single-family and duplex residents in the City is currently taken to Cedar Grove Recycling in
Maple Valley. Their yearly capacity is 195,000 tons of organic material. Currently, the facility handles
approximately 172,000 tons annually. Cedar Grove is permitted by the Seattle-King County Health Department
to have 250,000 cubic yards of organic material onsite.
The City's residential yard waste collection program has diverted increasing amounts of the residential waste
stream every year, successfully diverting over 30%in 2001, and more than seven percent(7%)of the City's
XII-26
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/Ol/04
total waste stream annually since it began in 1989. Yard waste makes up only 0.9 percent of the remaining
residential waste stream; therefore any increase in diversion would be minimal.
Food waste makes up almost thirty-five percent(35%) of the residential waste stream after recyclables and yard
wastes are diverted. The Solid Waste Utility implemented a pilot food waste composting program in 1994 and
1995 to assess the feasibility of diverting this material from Renton's residential waste stream. Worm compost
bins were delivered to approximately 200 residents and weekly measurements were made on their waste
practices. This led to a period of several years in which residents could obtain a worm bin from the city for the
purpose of residential food waste composting.
Reliabiliry of Existing Solid Waste Services a�id Facilities
The services of the City's solid waste and recycling collection contractor,Waste Management, Inc.,have been
very reliable since the inception of the program in 1989. The number of missed collections has remained
consistently low. Contingency plans for collection are provided in the solid waste contract in the event of
extreme weather conditions. Interruption of service due to a contract dispute is not likely because the City has
completed negotiations of a new contract with Waste Management,Inc. The new contract terminates at the end
of 2005,but has the potential to be extended with two 2-year extension options.
At this time, the capacities of the Renton Transfer Station and the Cedar Hills Landfill are sufficient, and any
regulatory issues are being addressed by the appropriate agency.
The capacity of the Cascade Recycling Center for processing recyclables and the capacity of Cedar Grove
Recycling for composting yard wastes are both adequate to meet the City's needs.
Forecasted Conditions
Futc�re Utility Service Areas
The City's Solid Waste Utility will continue to provide solid waste collection to all residents and businesses
within the city limits. Curbside collection of recyclables and yard waste will continue to be available to all
single-family and duplex residents in Renton. Multi-family residences continue to be eligible for on-site
collection of recyclables. Yard waste collection will continue to be offered to mobile home parks and multi-
family complexes for an additional fee.
When annexations take place,the franchise hauler in the annexed area has authority to collect solid waste for a
period of up to seven(7)years. After seven years,the City's contractar may take over service in the annexed
area. The City's contractor should be able to increase solid waste,recycling, and yard waste collection service
to households and businesses as needed.
Since King County has planned for both incorporated and unincorporated areas in the County,disposal
facilities are anticipated to be adequate should the City annex areas of unincorporated King County.
Location and Capacity of Future Facilities
Currently,King County plans to keep the Renton Transfer Station operational and to install a compactor by
2012, at a cost of$4,000,000. This date coincides with the projected closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill, and
will enable the facility to prepare waste for transport to a new location. Transportation of noncompacted waste
costs approximately 1.5 times more than the cost of hauling compacted waste. Therefore,the installation of the
compactor should minimize any necessary rate increases caused by the greater distance between the transfer
station and a new facility. King County's Fina12000 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan suggests
XII-27
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev.11/Oi/04
that a study be made of the possibility of privatization of the transfer system. The City of Renton is concerned
that this may limit market competition in the private sector. Tlie City is also concerned that ending public
ownership of transfer facilities will limit the City's influence over rates and service levels.
King County's Cedar Hills Landfill is the last regional land�ll located in the County. While the diversion rate
by City residents has risen sharply in the past ten years (diverting 58.6 percent as of July 2001),the overall
quantity of waste has also risen, and Cedar Hills is scheduled for closure in 2012. Under the 2000 King County
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan,the King County Solid Waste Division is exploring waste
export possibilities. After the Cedar Hills closure, it is likely that solid waste will be exported outside the
County.
Waste Management, Inc.'s Cascade Recycling Center will continue to receive Renton residents' recyclables as
long as the City contracts with Waste Management,Inc. for collection. To increase their overall processing
capacity,Waste Management Inc. has diverted paper generated in North King County and South Snohomish
County from the Seattle plant to its Woodinville transfer station for processing. This change has allowed the
Seattle plant to handle more recyclable material generated in South King County.
The amount of yard waste collected through the City's program is not expected to increase significantly.
Therefore, capacity at the Cedar Grove composting facility in the County should be sufficient to meet future
needs.
Coordinatio�i witlz Otlier Purveyors
The interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County,which designates the County's disposal
system far the disposal of all solid waste generated within city limits,remains in effect through June 30,2028.
Either party may request review and/or renegotiation of the agreement every five years. It is anticipated that the
City will coordinate with the County to negotiate a new interlocal agreement upon the expiration of the existing
agreement.
I�iterlocal Agreenients
Chapter 70.95 RCW requires the County to regularly update the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
(the Plan). According to the provisions of the City's interlocal agreement with King County,this update will
occur every three years The City will be included in future Plan updates, and representatives of the City will
continue to be involved in the Plan update process.
The Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan(LHWMP), in which the City of Renton participates, follows a
five-year update schedule as required by Chapter 70.105 RCW. The first update occurred in 1995. T'he City
will continue to work cooperatively with other jurisdictions and agencies involved in the LHWMP to
implement programs to manage hazardous wastes generated in small quantities from households and businesses
in King County, including the collection of hazardous waste fees from City solid waste customers.
Reliability
Annexations to the City and the closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill are not expected to have a significant impact
on the ability of the City's contractor to provide reliable solid waste,recycling and yard waste collection
services. If changes within Waste Management,Inc. affect the ability of their company to provide services to
City customers,the City has the ability to renegotiate the contract, or enter into a contract with another service
provider.
XII-28
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Depending on regional regulations, the yard waste composting facility at Cedar Grove, may have problems
handling significant increases in the amount of arganic waste collected in the future. However, the City does
not anticipate this to happen.
Objective: U-G: To provide a responsible, comprehensive waste management program that includes
economic ef�ciency, environmental sensitivity, and responsiveness to the needs of the community. The City
should pursue a reduction of the overall waste stream,recycling, and long-term waste handling and disposal
solutions.
Policy U-84. Provide and maintain an adequate Policy U-90. Coordinate with agencies in the
system of solid waste,recycling collection, region on educational and other programs for the
disposal, and handling to meet existing and future safe management and disposal of hazardous
needs. household wastes.
Policy U-85. Coordinate with regional agencies in policy U-91. Support products and practices that
planning for the facilities and services necessary for offer safe and effective alternatives to the use of
solid waste collection and disposal, including the potentially hazardous substances in order to reduce
siting of regional transfer and waste handling the total amount of hazardous waste.
facilities.
Policy U-86. Reduction of the waste stream should Policy U-92. Actively support the creation of
be supported and promoted for all residential, markets for products made with recycled materials.
commercial, and industrial uses within the city(i.e.
through programs and public education including Policy U-93. Actively support regionally
recycling, composting,re-use, and energy recovery coordinated efforts that promote producer
programs that meet enviromnental standards). responsibility and environmental stewardship.
Policy U-87. Where economically feasible and
legally acceptable, citywide collection of recyclable
materials should be supported and promoted.
Policy U-88. The proper handling and disposal of
solid waste should be required to protect public
health and safety.
Policy U-89. Contamination of land, air, and water
should be minimized or eliminated.
Electrical System
Existing Conditions
Background
Three purveyors distribute electricity to and within the Renton Planning Area: Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), Seattle City Light(SCL), and Puget Sound Energy(PSE). BPA is the regional
administrative entity of the U.S. Department of Energy. Seattle City Light is a publicly owned utility serving
Seattle and environs. Puget Sound Energy is a private, investor-owned utility that provides electrical service to
approximately 1 million customers in the Puget Sound region.
These three utilities are part of an integrated transmission grid that connects points of production and demand
and permits inter-utility exchange of power across the region. To make this possible,the various elements of
the individual systems were designed to function compatibly with the facilities of other network utilities. High
XII-29
C1TY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Rev. 11/O1/04
capacity transmission lines also allow inter-regional and international power transfers to compensate for
seasonal,region-wide variations in generation and demand.
BPA owns and operates most of the major transmission lines and substations located throughout the Pacific
Northwest. The agency sells transmission services on the high capacity grid to customers throughout the
region. Additionally, BPA markets electricity generated by federal hydroelectric projects and the Washington
Public Power Supply System. Puget Sound energy, Seattle City Light,and other utilities purchase power and
transmission services from BPA as local situations warrant.
Electricity is retailed to customers in the Renton Planning Area by Puget Sound Energy and,to a lesser extent,
by Seattle City Light. For both utilities, the primary generation facilities are located outside their service areas.
Puget Sound Energy supplements these sources with power generated and/or purchased within its greater
service area. Each utility schedules electrical generation to meet anticipated local demand loads with excess
production sold elsewhere on the power grid.
Existing Utility Service Area
Puget Sound Energy is the principal provider of electrical service within the Renton city limits, as well as most
of the remainder of the Renton Planning Area.
Electricity is provided to the Bryn Mawr and Skyway portions of the Renton Planning Area by SCL. By
historical circumstance, Seattle also serves 10 customers within the Renton city limits. Currently, SCL and
Puget Sound Energy are negotiating an agreement to transfer the facilities within the City of Renton to PSE.
This action probably won't occur until late 1994 at the earliest.
General Location of Facilities
Electrical facilities can generally be divided into generation,transmission, and distribution functions.
Transmission lines are identified by voltages of 115 kilovolt(kV)and above, distribution facilities have less
than 55,000 volts (55 kV), and a distribution substation transforms voltages of 115 kV or greater to feeder
circuits at lower voltages of 12 or 34 kV. Within the Planning Area,BPA operates transmission facilities,
Seattle City Light operates transmission and distribution facilities, and Puget Sound Energy engages in all three
functions. Figure 6-1 illustrates existing and proposed electrical substations and other transmission system
facilities within the Planning Area.
Renton's geographic position offers a logical location for transmission routes. Five BPA transmission circuits
follow the Rocky Reach-Maple Valley right-of-way,which enters the Planning Area from the east,just south of
the Cedar River, and terminates at BPA's Maple Valley Substation. The lines,two 500 kV, one 345 kV,and
two 230 kV, originate at BPA facilities north, south, and east of Renton.
As electrical service provider to most of the Planning Area,Pu�;et Sound Energy builds,maintains and/or
operates various facilities. These include high voltage transmission lines for bulk power transfers, substations
for system monitoring and control and changing of voltage levels, and lower voltage feeder lines to carry the
electricity to the consumers. The high capacity lines energized at 230 kV and 115 kV feed out from the Talbot
Hill Station,which receives power from the adjacent BPA Maple Valley Station. From Talbot Hill these lines
carry power to other transmission stations or to distribution substations where the voltage is stepped down for
entry into the feeder system.
XII-30
zn
� �
< y
� �
� o
a
� �
o �A
z
aw':<.*;::.a.>.'::�e;;1 � <;�> _ 'V BELLEVUE �` -� �- l�r�,' H
c �^ �
I� r--1-- l4 ���,u�J Z
`��s�� , I�c � L--���`��\ �..-�,�� �u.�....,,..�,,.,.i� � .
��� Figure 6-1 r
MEACE� �- jj� L� , y
ISLAN �� ` E�oun �
�� �
� 31 �
� (.� _� ,.� �
�� � �'°'��,� � � � ELECTRICAL FACILITIES r
,.� '. `� ; t�
_ ° � ' � �� ' �
z L
� � � � � �Puget Power Z
5 L� ' �� o � �, Seattle City Light �3
' s � ��'4�s I � �„r�•�' "'-"-"-••-Bonneville Power Administrotion
�t P Pro osed Tronsmission Lines
\� � n_J �. �'`/ .. � � � �',"`• P
r
���� �� 'I ', � � \ O Proposed Upgrade of Existing �
r` �o ��' •• ,� � -'-1 �'�,\ Lines from 115KV to 230KV �
� a �� '�.�.I � � � n
+..�1J�,�..�n r. r.
♦ � -�--� ��r� � SUBSTATIONS '! �
� � � yr,�s . `� �: �� � ' � Puget Boeing BPA SCL � �
-'� �..�...��. � Generation '�" "!
� \ I . . � A
'�._ J) � � ■ • Transmission �
� Ci � ' ' � � Distribution n �
��\ \ I\��,,, .w�' � /� ` ���r��ixR LIXI NACDOXALD! O PrOpO50d DiSt�ibution �
.���t,t. �' q%� . , I o Cable �
� , .v ii�et
u,�� -- r_r�::�� � o_ �� � ' � -------- y
City Limits
I�1�� I-- _ J- .�n � \� .�� - - _ _•- Urbon Growth Boundary
��.�f t x -���R�� �
t � \���;f�;;�;1�;. " �„a� i - Sphere of Influence
. ' J.�,^ `-{ � +sc.i, a�rfa�r+....e«.
�' � .i�_ � \ � i`'�`�ii�}i'�it ��.�:i�'i',��_-i:� :U
� ���i i �.. I �� _ I� ��� ..�...�"p� 1 d
' I .�' +„� I v, ia � ..�...�.•.....,.." i O 5000 10000 H
� I ,_-�-� � _[=� -�. -.
T,�_!1 �-� i �- ;o•_•_ J-`�- .�}"�� '4, '`-� ,'' , � � �
I � j ¢�„ '` ' ','.` o �r��� u'r. �nr \ , �
� �'� _.'—
T � /' � I , �J � � � Note: For graphic presentation only.
.� (".-—---� ��� � �„_�, n
-_..!/ I � ;}' ` � ���_ � ( Facilities are not to scale. [rJ
� I . � `I a I �x � i\
�M � � =-- \� " �
�,..: :: � J, ,.� z
I 7 s + �:� SPRIMC j'd . ,
, �ENT N 1 +1� _ � >:,.:. `� i
4 l � Eninr urr ` Q
Y � i —`�w�._ I� � ,' 1 � � � �-- ' : LONG RANGE PLANNING •
4 - � �� � .,� � �� ; J - � ° "� �� •r�aae �LUF.ACE � O.Dennison
� a '— ��unrnr LIAR Q� \ -.�_r, � • ' R.MacOnie. D.Vianeaki
� ' � � I ������ , - '' �_�ure roaxes l � � � * 24 March 1995 �
� i / +'�'—' ---a'^ — - ' �1"v � �
g �1 N � +}""' � I c - - .- � '�.._._._.� ��1 lfl
y 9 .__ '_ _.:. � .` - , �.� , l0
SWRCE: PUGET PON£R IAND PLANNING C15,OCTOBER 1992/SEATTLE CITY LIGNT,OGTOBER 199� �
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev.11/01/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
The portion of Renton's Planning Area currently served by Seattle City Light is small,containing only two
minor distribution substations,Bryn Mawr and Skyway. Power is provided to these substations by Seattle's
Creston distribution substation.
In addition, several Seattle City Light rights-of-way pass through the City and the Urban Growth Area. These
circuits include:
• The Bothell-Renton Right-of-Way(ROW),with one of two SCL 230 kV lines currently in use
and leased to Puget Sound Energy.
• The Renton-Creston ROW, with six 230 kV lines.
• The Cedar Falls ROW,with one 115 kV line.
Capacity/Reliabiliry of Existing Systeni
Puget Sound Energy and Seattle City Light are both capable of ineeting the current electrical load in their
respective service areas.
Puget Sound Energy operates eleven distribution substations in the Renton Planning Area with a total
nameplate capacity of 284,400 kilowatts (kW). The residential/commercial peak load utilization factor for
these substations is 87.5%. SCL's Creston substation is outside the Planning Area,but supplies power within it.
Creston's capacity is 106,000 kW and has a utilization factor of 81%.
The utilization factor, or the load to capacity ratio, is normally maintained in the 75%to 85%range. Leaving
excess capacity under normal conditions allows a reserve for periods of extraordinary load during extreme cold
weather, and for system diversity.
The capacity of individual elements is not the sole consideration in evaluating an electrical system,however.
Our dependence on electrical power is such that the overall grid and the constituent utilities must continue to
furnish power even with the failure of individual components.
Electric service interruptions are most frequently a product of extraordinary circumstances. Either an unusual
load has overtaxed an element of the system or it has been weakened or removed by some external condition or
event. Any such occurrence could cut off an area from the grid and/or endanger other parts of the system by a
sudden transfer of power from one conductor to another of insuf�cient capacity. To mitigate these threats to
the system,redundant lines and facilities of adequate capacity are necessary. This diversity is programmed to
meet reliability criteria,which assume a failure of one or two components of a system(single or double
contingency)with no loss of customers or damage to equipment.
Forecasted Conditions -Electrical
Forecasted increases in population would result in 135,151 persons and 91,874 jobs, within the Planning Area,
by 2010. Based on these forecasts the Renton Planning Area will have an additional load of 147.3 MVA,
excluding industrial load increases, at the extreme winter peak in 2010. Industrial load additions will comprise
some part of the 82.3 MVA increase that Puget Sound Energy anticipates for Renton industrial consumers by
2020.
XII-32
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
Rev. 11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Future Capacity of Electrical Facilities
To assure system reliability and to provide the capacity necessary to accommodate the growth anticipated for
the Renton Planning Area, SCL,BPA, and PSE have planned for upgrades and additions to their respective
systems.
Puget Sound Energy has prepared a King County Draft GMA Electrical Facilities Plan. According to this plan,
the utility has several system improvements in progress within the Renton Planning Area that are necessary to
serve forecasted load growth for the next thirty years. Puget Sound Energy's plans for future transmission lines,
facilities, and upgrades will increase system capacity and reliability. Also proposed is the Aqua substation.
This substation may or may not be located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary,but in either case would
likely serve residents both within and outside of the urban growth boundary.
Existing SCL 4 kV lines are being replaced with a new 26 kV network. The Bryn Mawr and Skyway
substations will no longer be needed and will be taken off-line when this upgrade is complete. Additionally,
SCL has indicated the possibility of adding two 230 kV transmission lines from BPA's Covington Substation to
South Seattle on existing transmission line corridors to serve load growth within the next twenty years.
The BPA has plans to increase reliability by installing additiona1500 kV circuits and 500 kV to 230 kV
transformers. While these will benefit Renton,they are not within the Planning Area. The only project that
BPA currently has planned for inside the Planning Area is a static VAR for the Maple Valley Station. This
device senses increased load and signals the capacitars to release stored energy.
Conservatioia &Dentand Ma�zagement
Conservation is one means to reduce loads, existing or projected, on the electric system. This can delay the
need for new or expanded generation and transmission facilities. System wide,Puget Sound Energy expects
that conservation will yield an additiona1296 average MW and 592 MW on system peak in the year 2010.
Conservation programs are enacted on a utility-wide basis and regulated by the WIJTC.
While conservation reduces overall electrical consumption, demand-side management influences when the
demand will occur. Educating consumers to modify their consumption patterns, imposing a sliding rate
structure for time-of-day and far increment of energy used, or directly controlling energy use by certain
customers,can all serve to spread the load throughout the day. Since electric utility systems are designed to
accommodate peak loads,this method can delay the need for additional capacity.
Objective U-H: Promote the availability of safe, adequate,and efficient electrical service within the City and
the remainder of its Planning Area, consistent with the utility's regulatory obligation to serve.
Policy U-94. The provision of electricity to the Policy U-95. Encourage purveyors of electrical
City's Planning Area should be coordinated with power to make facility improvements/additions
local and regional purveyors to ensure the within existing electric facility corridors where
availability of electricity to meet projected growth ap��ropriate.
in population and employment.
XII-33
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Natural Gas And Fuel Pipelines
Existing Conditions -Natural Gas
Background
Natural gas is a mixture of hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon gases extracted from porous rock formations
below the earth's surface. The gas makes its way from the producing fields via the interstate pipeline at high-
pressures, often over one thousand pounds per square inch(psi). Colorless and odorless as it comes off the
interstate pipeline, a powerful odorant,typically mercaptan, is added for safety purposes to make leaks easier to
detect. Through a series of reduction valves, the gas is delivered to homes at pressures of from 0.25 to 2 psi.
In recent decades,the residential popularity of natural gas has risen. Cleaner burning and less expensive than
the alternatives, oil and electricity, it has become the fuel of choice in many households for cooking, drying
clothes, and heating home and water.
Natural Gas Utility Service Area
Puget Sound Energy(formerly Puget Sound Energy)provides natural gas service to approximately 650,000
customers in the Puget Sound Region, including Renton and its Urban Growth Area.
General Location of Natural Gas Facilities
Puget Sound Energy operates under a franchise agreement with the City of Renton, which allows PSE to locate
facilities within the public street right-of-ways.
The gas distribution system consists of a network of high-pressure mains and distribution lines that convey
natural gas throughout the Planning Area. Natural gas is provided to PSE by the Northwest Pipeline
Corporation,which operates a system extending from Canada to New Mexico. Two parallel Northwest
Pipeline Corporation high-pressure mains enter the Planning Area south of Lake McDonald and terminate at the
South Seattle Gate Station located at Talbot Road and South 22nd Street(see Figure 7-1). PSE high-pressure
mains then extend to smaller lines branching-off from the primary supply mains. Through a series of smaller
lines and pressure regulators the gas is delivered to consumers. PSE also operates an underground propane
storage facility(Figure 7-1). The main components of the natural gas system are illustrated in Figure 7-2.
Capacity of Natural Gas Facilities
Although PSE serves most of Renton and its Urban Growth Area, a portion of the Planning Area,west of the
Renton Municipal Airpart, and straddling SR-900 is currently riot served by Puget Sound Energy(refer to
Figure 7-1). Provision of natural gas service to this area would only require extension of intermediate service
lines.
The capacity of the system is primarily constrained by the volume of gas entering the PSE network from the
Northwest Pipeline Corporation mains. Current capacity of the South Seattle Gate Station,the point of entry
for natural gas to the area, is nine million standard cubic feet per hour(scfh). This can serve approximately
180,000 residential customers.
The minimum pressure at which gas can be delivered is fifteen pounds per square inch(15 psi). Methods for
increasing supply to a particular area include replacement of the lines, looping, installing parallel lines, and
inserting higher-pressure lines into greater diameter,but lower pressure mains.
XII-34
C1TY OF RENTON UTILITIES EGEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
11/O 1/04
A reserve of natural gas supply is maintained in order to respond to temporary shortfalls in the natural gas
supply due to weather-driven higher demand or supply interruptions. A number of separate utilities share the
facility,however, and hence it is not dedicated to the Renton Planning Area.
Natural Gas System Reliability
Since natural gas is chiefly used as a home heating fuel, demand rises as the outdoor temperature drops. The
locally available gas supply and the capacity of PSE's delivery system may not always be sufficient to provide
product to all customers during periods of exceptional demand. Therefore,PSE has several short term, load-
balancing strategies. As stated previously,PSE operates a storage facility that provides a reserve of additional
gas far times of shortfall. Also, some gas customers are served under an interruptible service contract. For
those times when gas resources become limited, these connections can be temporarily dropped from the system.
Residential customers are always granted first priority for available gas supply.
Another strategy to maintain system pressure is the looping of mains. Feeding product from both ends of a
pipeline decreases the possibility of localized pressure drops aud increases system reliability.
Forecasted Conditions
Puget Sound Energy predicts a growth rate of 41.2%in demand for this 20 year planning horizon. According to
this assumption, demand for gas will average 1,227,562.6 cubic feet per hour for December 2010 within the
Renton Planning Area. PSE has stated that they will be able to accommodate this increased demand. This will
be accomplished through an upgrade of the South Seattle Gate Station to allow the entry of an additional two
million scfh into the system, for a total capacity of eleven million scfh. The backfeed from Covington will add
another three million scfh and,with the current peak hour feed of one million scfh from Issaquah,there will be
sufficient supply capacity to serve the customer base anticipated for 2010.
Proposed New or I»zproved Facilities
Figure 7-1 shows the one proposed high pressure main required to meet the increased gas demand,which
should result from the forecast growth. The ultimate placement of the line will be based on right-of-way
permitting, environmental standards, coordination with other utilities and existing infrastructure placement.
PSE has a policy to expand the supply system to serve additional customers. Gas connections are initiated by
customer requests.
Maximum capacity of the existing distribution system can be increased by the following methods: increasing
distribution and supply pressures in existing lines, installing parallel mains,replacing existing with larger sized
mains, looping mains, and adding district regulators from supply mains to provide additional intermediate
pressure gas sources.
XII-35
� �
�
o �
� O
�
�
�
z
�
,:..;.: : , .. ELLEY E _. . � I
�
r.:.., r _ -_'-u
.t.�. ' '� 8 U � c-,,,�[; in i t
'� ��' "�.,,�� rvJ l..J
'9.<§''�: � +- N � 7 � �....j��—,�.` r� i� �
� i��'.�,t�.
� � '�r i..i i r+
MERC yi �- -; Figure .7-1 , �
ISLAN� �+ soeeK �� �� '�
`-� � NEWCA �
1 � �---�"'-��o^ �� �
� =� � � NATURAl. GAS FACI�ITIES �
� '-� R�,.v r � � C+7
� .e i �,
�� �� �� �� � � �
\ ' t �3d. � �
\+� � � 'i I �"j
1�*S�,T1.E �� �� C7 ' I
� ILL�� 7�� � m .
�
r ' ; � "'—� `� o � NORTNWE$T PIPELINE CORPORA710N '�,{
I �J � � 11 i �
1
i i �� � A �"�,,�`,. .,.._..�.._ Existing Mains �
�a-- Tr'
#� `�_./ � _'� ..,� ■t
� � � � �
�' ° i ce„�e,xo �\ WASHINGT6N NATURAL GAS ��. �
� �
>C C N i �. \ so
� ':� � � � ._._.� \�� Existing High Pressure Mains y �
i;y , � \..,1 -�-•-�-•- Progosed High ?ressure Moins � �
� •' \ f ,
� y. ` � i � « Existing Facilities , h
/ �� � �.
\ 1 � ^ `� I KL.GTIlC6l. Glfd N�C80M�L0� . �
� � 1 "`'� .� i `�..'� � ;�:�,;�;;Areo with no notnroi qos serv4ce ':� �
� .� �;"'�r`�""�� '� ,p i ua
u � i / ~ �_ � , ���°�y"" �_�P''__,_"�,.�: J� -"--------'- y ..
� � r ` / (i� i _._._._._._._._._.- Cit Limtts
� i � r •�� ,r '"'-__........_�`:!__.._� 1 �? •w�c v_"'4i`Y���i i _.._.._.._.._._.._.- Urban Growth Bo�ndary
� �'�. I �""` r�`:"J f� _N y_ ��,R„ � - Sphere of Influence
a � ^�C, -. }�•.� �� — `w �a �
, � (( + r u i � ��`"'� _.._�, •_;�r =.._---� _._.. .'�::;...,.. ' O
� -�� -- �::_.. "' � ••_�:�. �
� ; � � � - 1 � � �o ' �,l �" Q 5000 10000 d
`�, � ,� �:. r--� i sS�. � ■�
' � ' � � ! � ! -f�y - --. —.,: : `�-s<,:� �:__.� :: � , ' t—t
I�If � i I �. �+a�"I i ., ` �I\`•�"'�t 4li ��..�L�F'X O[5/fl[ � ` � ( �
� � �1 � � 1 � .,1 l'^�..__�. �F"�:. 2 � .. .
, '-� i PJ ��. ���',, Z _
, 4 • �`' J Y� f._".'-'"._.� ���I �.,:'�° `� Note: For graphic presentation only.
/� � i I i ( �� � � t'*r�� \ Fotilities are not to scale. �
, � � `^ # f,� ! rrm.rr u�:a � :
� �� .. E_.�. �`�:�li�nur wr+
KEA7T � \._�� ��"�� � t." i 1 � LdP7G RANGE PLANNING z I
� y .yj t_�._' fi ....�.....+ y � .� i.:":.'.:� �.'.__ �_ O.DenRieon ..,. �
II � I "� r �4` "A"!R�1��_I4FWlNCE �,� ...
l � � � t xrnra a.dz `,f— � ��-��� , ��t'(� ' R.Mac4nie, D.Yisneski
i '� `� 24 March 1895
, _
� :
� . �
r � i � �.� f . urs rocn7 �F� ,, LTt
. ;., . . ... �_._._., �._._._.
�. � � - r__._�_._._._._._� _.....,, _-.., .--�:�`l. . ..._.�. __� 1 � ....
,
,
,. .
' i � O
� �_.__�..: L. ' � ' �_
- , 1 t E �; � . � � �
,
SWRCE: WASHINGTflN NASilRAt GAS,1943 �
�
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 5099
11/O1/04
Petroleum Fuel Pipelines
Existing Conditions
Utility Service Area
Olympic Pipeline Company is a joint-interest company that provides a variety of fuel oil products via a system
of pipelines throughout the region. The stock is held by Atlantic Richfield Corporation(Arco), Shell and
Texaco oil companies. Olympic transports oil products from the Ferndale British Petroleum(BP)refinery,the
Cherry Point Arco refinery and the Anacortes Shell and Texaco refineries through Renton to Seattle, Sea-Tac
International Airport, and points south to Portland, Oregon. Olympic's Renton facilities function as a regional
distribution hub, as well as supplying the local market with petroleum products.
General Locatio�i of Fuel Product Pipelines and Other Facilities
The Olympic Pipeline Company's facilities in the Renton Planning Area include a system of pipes,varying from
12 to 20 inches in diameter, and a central monitoring station at 2319 Lind Avenue SW. Petroleum products
enter Renton via two pipes from the City's northern border, and then extend south and west to the Renton
Station. From here, a 12-inch main heads north, eventually intercepting the City of Seattle Skagit Transmission
Line right-of-way toward Seattle. Two parallel branches also extend westward to the Green River, at which
point one line heads west to Sea-Tac Airport and one turns south to serve Tacoma and beyond. Figure 7-2
shows the pipelines within the Renton Planning Area as well as Olympic's Renton Station. Renton Station is
the monitoring and control center for the entire pipeline network. Here, also, oil products are transferred to
trucks for distribution.
Capaciry of Fuel Product Pipelines and Facilities
The Olympic Pipeline Company currently carries an average of approximately 270,000 barrels of product per
day,varying according to the transported material. The absolute capacity of the system is over 350,000 barrels.
As the primary supplier of petroleum products to Western Washington, Olympic states that system capacity is
sufficient to meet current demand.
Forecasted Conditions
Olympic,though not directly serving City of Renton, affirms that they can and will increase the capacity of the
system to accommodate a demand commensurate with the expected population and land uses anticipated by
2020 in the Renton Planning Area. Aside from laying new pipelines, options for increasing capacity include
introducing drag reducing agents to the petroleum products,increasing the horsepower of the pumps, and
replacing individual sections of pipe where bottlenecks tend to occur.
Objective U-I: Promote the safe transport and delivery of natural gas and other fuels within the Planning Area.
Policy U-96. Coordinate with local and regional Policy U-98. Allow for the extension of natural
purveyors of natural gas for the siting of gas distribution lines to and within the city limits
transmission lines, distribution lines,and other and Urban Growth Area,provided they are
facilities within the Renton Planning Area. consistent with development envisioned in the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy U-97. Support cost effective public
programs aimed at energy conservation, efficiency,
and supplementing of natural gas supplies through
new technology.
XII-37
_ n
� �
o y
� �C
� O
�
�
�
z
H
• `_'' BELLEWE --n' n y '�',, z
. i �sW • � I � r---�_� � c�,i;u�J \ -f-- �"
��: � 4��
�y c .�l,qf L= -�\� \ i�-��I� i ISSA �
C"
MERCE� . . �- Figure 7-2 y '
lSLAN � � � un eo,vx � �j �
NE�IAIC�A E I �
�
❑ � j � _J''���
�
' � `'°�o, � �I PETROLEUM PRODUCT PIPEL6VE t�"
��,..1 . c� � ��`�F �� � (OLYMPIC PIPELME COMPANY) �
;� � �1 � � tr1
\ � � i j � �, . L y
SE-TLE� n I
� n� ���a —� � � I
�'�. iL.L., �
'�� _� �; �n g i
i •. �' +� �t � i � �d
�.- '.� i:�`"'-u �--�-.. ".
K
'+L \ '� , '�� '\, O
X L� �''�o ,� `r �� � � ' I \�'� -••-••-••- Petroleum Product Pipeline f~p �
QQ
�\ 7 � —�—�L-- c[xcre�r rto 1 � .'r+
w \ � , � � , Monitoring & Control Station �
0o T L � j � �p
1 � \ J
�° � ------- City limits � �
li �-- � ' � -•-•-�-•- Urban Growth Boundary O N
I - ' ` � � j -��-��-•�- Sphere of Influence Q"
�. .�.J
\ ' ��% � .rr urnur ucr�urmn�u i �
-• ..�..i � � � � �
� J ` I
C ; �. ��� -
� "— ^-°���»o ,
- .. .. . �-- > �� O 5000 10000 p
._. .��i��-•.�� � �� e j `� �7
�� � s , � t7
I� �• � ! lv _ j H
I� 1` .___;�-- '��, �. !- 1 � I Note. For graphic prosentation only. Z'
�� L'"'._.� , �
T-�--. � l '� ��h�. � 1 l Facilities are not to scale. rZ
) . � � N ,00 u'�t ccs�rtr , �
� / � � f———.� `�� � ` CrJ
! i � i
i
'� , i -�---____ - � `: Z
; I KENT I '�� � �?�'� .-- � ry I SPRNC G�f �
\ �SKIDY GNt � �
/ �n° � LONG RANGE PLANNING
� �. 1 � �1_ ,__. '�`��g'{...5:`. � � O.Denniaon
� '� Y��: � � �":`�>:;,';(":" ._.. sr•� rsc ov mttncncr. �� � R.MacOnie. D9isneski (j�
� � I re.m�aa urr .� `� - �"� r��` � 24 March 1995 O
� � I .�— i..___._� ._,�._ / iwre ioudar;,� � \ �\
�..�..-� � �t.. � l�
y�-'-- -'-.I--' - L. � I �^`.� �r- _ _'- -' �. l0
SOURCE: 01_YMPIC PIPEUNE CONPANY, 19E9 �
CITY OF RENTON UTILTTIES ELEMENT
11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Policy U-99. Require that petroleum product where those facilities are located in the Aquifer
pipelines are operated and maintained in such a Protection Area.
manner that protects public safety, especially
Telecommunications
Telecommunications: Conventional Telephone, Fiber Optic Cable, Cellular Telephone, and Cable
Television
Existing Conditions - Conventional (Wireline/landline) Telephone
Utility Service Area - Conventional Telephone
Service to Renton and its Planning Area is provided by Qwest Communications, Inc (formerly US West).
Qwest is an investor-owned corporation, whose holdings include companies serving regional, national, and
international markets, including telephone services to 25 million customers in 14 western states. The
subsidiaries include directory publishing, cellular mobile communications and paging, personal
communications networks, cable television, business communications systems sales and service,
communications software, and financial services.
All cities within the State of Washington fall within a particular Local Access and Transport Area (LATA).
These LATAs are telephone exchange areas that define the area in which Qwest is permitted to transport
telecommunications traffic. There are 94 exchanges within Washington where Qwest provides dial tone and
other local services to customers.
General Location of Conventional Telephone Facilities
Telephone service systems within Renton and its Planning Area include switching stations, trunk lines, and
distribution lines. Switching stations, also called "Central Offices" (COs), switch calls within and between
line exchange groupings. These groupings are addressed uniquely by an area code and the first three digits of
a telephone number. Each line grouping can carry up to 10,000 numbers. Renton has 14 of these groupings.
The CO serving Renton is located in a building on 3rd Avenue South within downtown Renton.
Four main "feeder" cable routes generally extend from each CO, heading to the north, south, east, and west
(Figure 8-1). Connected to these main feeder routes are branch feeder routes. The branch feeder routes
connect with thousands of local loops that provide dial tone to every subscriber. These facilities may be
aerial or buried, copper or fiber. Local loops can be used for voice or data transmission (such as facsimile
machines or computer modems). A variety of technologies are utilized including electronics, digital
transmission, fiber optics, and other means to provide multiple voice/data paths over a single wire. Methods
of construction are determined by costs and local regulations.
XII-39
� �
0
� �
�
�Sz�s�,a:`:,�.'�:'ti I _ "fid'x_:`#. �_ �� BfLLEVUE u --�� � ti `l� 0
': i i \ �,
.:;�fi:?'�.? ��---r—i`` ` _`��L� l �
� i �'---i— —���_ !� i�SSA �
z " �-1 �'�. i—,
MERCE� �__:_,
uLAN r 'W l bRd i �� Figure �—�. �
`� � NEWCA � �
I '� f.�. 3i �
gF r--- �''Ge.a« .° ^i V�
�, �� `` '��,, �� ; US WEST TELEPHONE r
���,�, �� L ,« � _; :�.� ` FACILITIES �
�g,i '�'�'.I�. �.� �I P �� � dr _ �
i
� �� � r ��. i 1
5 LE �r, i
f u.� �� — C � i C
' , "�\ �,� i
r-- —� _ � y $ �
i —J �� �� ' � e ' .
� � � �
`�`� � �� �1 �1 �
* o i �
` y°�>C •�` .,�FS �_,,, — — ''� � �` �
�
g ' -, l. � �-�-�-� b �
• i -- —••— Main Feeder �
O �
�i_ � j , Central Office C7 �
� urr r�cmnun� �
� ��urru� � .
I �
' � � A
-�� �—.1 � -------- City Limits �
: i � �z �•ne v.v.c.,—,o j ='-�—�—•—�— Urban Growth Boundary �'
� �g i —•— Sphere of �nfluence y
S�� i } � � i� j �
� � � �. ;g ; �
� . � ;� d
�� ( �_ J� �-�-•� �, �p �"—� , O 5000 10000 Z
� � � 'e�M'�'r L:_._J I 1 � �� �
/ ,\��` u#r otsrrtr Z
J � .
_ / i_, � r._._._._._.� �,j � C�
� i � Note: For grophic presentotion only. �
r,,, � � � i � Facilities ore not to scale.
��, � KENT j �_ � ja W .. :�x �.,� � sveinc t� Z
1 �'1 � ��;W°�' .�x.ur wra
�� Y ��— � �s;:�e"�'• _ \ 0 DennRAnGE PLANNING �
q '•1 ,� ."i•��,j`•c.�k:o 1 e or um.urnce �
� , # � Y 14 ' .� R•MacOnie, D.Vianeeki
I ANTMIR UKf \-� .� t�.��.::':�• —� � 1 ♦� ♦
< :
..
.�n � �/t' �'.. ��.{yr.�
TT£
T
. '::..
� ;�y.jy�;: � � ''. 24 MaroL 1996
� � .....>..pr
3� � �. :•.,.:..:�� _.._._.._..J �''.
. ---- � �::� �� l0
... �.:::.,.
SWRCE: US WEST,199J � - � � � �
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Capacity of Conventional Telephone Facilities
Capacity of a CO is a function of the type of switch employed. Advances in technology and the use of digital
transmission provide for increases in switch capacity to meet growth.
Reliability of the Conventional Telephone System
Telephone service is very reliable with the exception of extraordinary circumstances such as severe weather
events or natural disasters. In many cases, the system may still be operational, but the volume of calls being
placed to and from the affected area creates shortfalls in service. In Renton, the Inauguration Day windstorm
of January 1993 resulted in some system outages. Generally, following a catastrophic event, public telephone
systems would be restored before service to individuals and businesses.
Forecasted Conditions - Conventional Telephone
Forecasted Capacity of Conventional Telephone Facilities
Ample capacity exists in the Renton CO to accommodate growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Element. Recent technological advancements have resulted in consolidation of equipment at the Renton
CO. Several additional floors are available in the building housing the CO for future expansion of the
system. Line facilities within the Planning Area would require some upgrading, but no new buildings would
be needed to meet projected growth.
Regulations governing telecommunications require that the purveyor provide adequate telecommunication
service on demand. Upgrading facilities and constructing new facilities accommodate growth. New
technology is employed to enhance service, when available and practical. Enhancements necessary to
maintain adequate capacity are determined through regular evaluation of the system.
Qwest has confirmed that they will be able to extend timely service to all current and new subscribers
anticipated in the population forecasts for the Renton Planning Area.
Existing Conditions - Fiber Optic Telecommunication systems
Utility Service Area -Fiber Optic Telecommunications
The Starcom Service Corporation, a Washington corporation of the Canadian Starcom International Optics
Corporation of Vancouver, B.C. plans to locate facilities within the City of Renton Planning Area. The
system is a "carriers carrier" and is not intended to connect with individual users in the Ciry of Renton.
Services are to be leased to other telecommunications purveyors. The cable based telecommunications system
will provide a telecommunication link between Vancouver B.C. and Seattle.
General Location of Existing Fiber Optic Telecommunications Facilities
As of this writing, no Starcom fiber optic facilities are in place in Renton. However, the company is
currently engaged in the permitting required to bury cable within the 100 foot wide Burlington Northern
Railroad right-of-way, about four feet below ground. The line generally follows the eastern shore of Lake
Washington from the northern ciry limits to the Boeing facility, and then roughly parallels I-405 until it
intersects with I-5.
XII-41
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT
11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Forecasted Conditions - Fiber Optic Telecommunications Systems
Forecasted Capacity of Fiber Optic Telecommunications Facilities
According to Starcom, the proposed fiber optic cable and latest technology regenerative equipment will
provide capaciry to meet growth envisioned in the City's Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Existing Conditions - Cellular Telephone
Background- Cellular Telephone
Cellular system technology works on the principle of reusing radio frequencies. The same radio frequency
can be reused as long as service areas do not overlap. In this way, shorter antennas can be used and located
on top of existing structures, rather than constructing freestanding towers.
Siting of cellular facilities depends on how the system is configured. The cell sites must be designed so that
channels can be reused, because the FCC allocates a limited number of channels to the cellular telephone
industry. As cell sites were initially developed, a few large cells were established using hilltops or tall
buildings to site transmission and receiving antennas. This allowed for maximum coverage of the large cell.
Clusters of smaller cells have since replaced the larger configuration, diminishing the need for larger
antennas. Thus, shorter antennas and poles provide coverage for the smaller cell sites. This division of cells
will continue to occur as the demand for cellular service grows. Eventually, cell sites will be placed less than
two miles apart with antennas situated on poles about 60-feet high, or the height of a four-story building.
Cell sites are located within the center of an area defined by a grid system. Topography and other built
features can affect signal transmission, so the cell is configured to locate the cell site at an appropriate place
to provide the best transmission/reception conditions. Sub-cells are sometimes created because natural
features such as lakes, highways or inaccessible locations prevent siting within the necessary one-mile radius
from the ideal grid point. Preferred cell site locations include: existing broadcast or communications
towers, water towers, high rise buildings, vacant open land appropriately zoned that could be leased or
purchased, and areas with low population densities to diminish aesthetic impacts.
When new antenna structures are required for the cell site, monopoles or lattice structures are often utilized.
Monopoles generally range in height from 60 feet to 150 feet. The base of the monopole varies between 40
to 72 inches in diameter. Monopoles are generally more aesthetically acceptable, but changes in the system
such as lowering of antennas are not possible without major changes. Lattice structures are either stabilized
by guy wires or self-supported. Generally, the maximum height of a lattice structure is limited to between
200 and 250 feet. Guyed towers can be built to accommodate a greater height, but the guy wires can pose
navigational problems to migrating birds and aircraft. In addition, the taller towers often are perceived to
have more severe aesthetic impacts.
All structures require that a six to eight foot separation occur between antennas for signal reception. This is
termed "system diversity" and is needed on the reception antennas in order to receive an optimal signal from
the mobile telephone.
XII-42
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT O R D I N AN C E N O. 5 0 9 9
11/O1/04
Utility Service Area - Cellular Telephone
Cellular telephone service is licensed by the FCC for operation in Metropolitan Service Areas (MSA) and
Rural Service Areas (RSA). The FCC grants two licenses within each service area. One of those licenses is
reserved for the local exchange telephone company (also referred to as the wireline carrier). Qwest Cellular
(NewVector) holds the wireline licenses in the Tacoma, Seattle, Bellingham, and Spokane MSA. The non-
wire line licenses in these areas, and also in the Yakima MSA is held by McCaw Cellular Communications
(Cellular One). Recently, Cellular One merged with AT&T.
Existing Capacity of Cellular Telephone Facilities
Forecasting for cellular facilities is accomplished using a two-year horizon. Information regarding current
and future predicted number of subscribers is considered by the purveyors to be proprietary, and no data was
furnished in this regard. However, statewide customer counts total approximately 250,000, with the number
anticipated to increase to several million by the year 2010. It is predicted that by the period covering the
years 2005 to 2010, approximately twenty percent(20%) of the population in Washington State will be
served.
Reliability of Cellular Telephone Facilities
Cellular communications are considered to be more reliable than conventional telephone systems because they
can continue to operate during electrical power outages. Each cell site is equipped with a back-up power
supply, either a battery or generator, or combination of the two. Severe weather events or natural disaster
conditions have validated the use of cellular telephones on numerous occasions throughout the country. When
conventional telephone systems fail, or telephone lines are jammed, cellular calls have a better chance of
being completed.
Forecasted Conditions - Cellular Telephone
Future Capacity of Cellular Telephone Facilities
As previously stated, forecasting for new cellular facilities uses a relatively narrow time frame of two years.
Expansion is demand driven. Raising the density of transmission/reception equipment to accommodate
additional subscribers, cell splitting, follows rather than precedes increases in local system load. Therefore,
cellular companies must maintain a short response time and a tight planning horizon.
Existing Conditions - Cable Television
Background- Cable Television
Cable television or CATV (Community Antenna Television) originated with small-scale attempts to obtain a
clear television signal in areas too remote or too obstructed to receive one via the airways. Dating from the
1940s, the early systems were constructed of surplus wiring and basic electronic hardware. Subsequent
technological innovations in signal transmission have increased the number of available channels and
permitted the emergence of new players in the television broadcast industry. The multiplicity of channels and
the ability to direct the signal to specific addresses have opened up both niche and global markets to
information and entertainment purveyors. In addition to the provisions of cable television services,
advancements in technology have allowed the current purveyor to provide high speed access to Internet
services with the provision of additional features expected as market demands dictate.
XII-43
� n
� �
0
� �
�
�
�
_, I � "i BELCEVt1E � (��c-.,� f�,nu \� �-1
���+i�:' �. r___•r_, 1�__ I- ' ..,'i� ►^i
..< � _ } � ` � � �r– � Q�2 C
.�____ ���Y �'�-� � `- =; �,��� �_, � �igure �� �
.� `� �
�,
�� �
MERCE �
ISLA� � 3j �
y1 uu sonax
� � ��►�,, � i ���J•'��h�o'Yh � � �; PROPQSED �
�, ��. `�, �`'�, � - � ; FIBEROPTIC CABE.E �
_ � � �7 � t �
I _ I � 4yi' ` ,.
' 1
3L . —fj � � " �
5 � � + "qqk`T .��--� , �J'�/ � i ..,.,, �
v�_'i � I, 1 � � , VI
r^ � � f" f'� � > `�.--�,�.... � !L u
� �J p I
I 3 ,- �y� M+
��" .�./� $ i � ,.,. M+��
$
�'�q, O f. cf.utTL1+RG .. . � t"� (�
� I � �
� �� � '�' `\•• I O M/
.i—� `��7�'r� r'^� � . `�j . '� � �`'�
A ' ' A
� i
�, ����, wv,uraoratai . StarCom Fiberoptic Cable _... n
� � i �
\ j�1--�+..f`"r i -----_______ City limits ',.
t6
i _._._._._._._._._ Urban Growth 9oundary
--`,_� � � w�au v.�.� - 4 � SPhere Of Influence ,..
� �,i--- �� � -.._.._.._.._.._._ �
� — ' � �
� �r
� � � ` i$ `' ; 0 500o i000a �+
;x ,..�, , �
{ _ �A �.__� i � �
I l ^���'+ �' L��._._I i l � Z ..
'.,."'__ \,M`�oy !: �
' � . � �Y � �}u�'P D[SIRf �T �� �
�``--=--+� Nate: For graphic presentation oniy. �
J �_� � � r""'—""""� �i Facititits are not to sco�e.
i i �
__. j '� � � .;.- i SPRcvc G � ., O
,�,..,, ' '.r�-.,. �.`�'���xaar urs ` �, LONG RANGE PLANNING
� '°'w�x�.< � 1 � O.Denniaon
KEN? i � �� ',?::F��,"s�a, �
� r -- -. � �qP��eyzE � � R.MncOnie. D.Vianenki
� � !f \ .J ` :s<:':;.}::t:':� --��'" `�..� '� � 24 March 1993 �
g ' ,� � � \ � `'':�::>`.`<<:<;;:,;:,� � . �
� ��?jr�nmr�urs }(r �+.Lirs`1??��.�._...... ' � , �
� _ l�
� � r�� ��k ;`V��,. J � �
y .-_____..__ '�'�`''___. � � `�
SpURCE: STARCOM, 1993
�
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT O R D I N A N C E N O. 5 0 9 9
11/O1/04
Utility Service Area - Cable Television
The current purveyor holds a cable television franchise to serve the City of Renton. The service area
includes the entire incorporated area of the City, expanding with annexations. All residential neighborhoods
within the City are currently served. Service is still unavailable in some commercial areas due to market
conditions, which presently preclude line extension.
General Description and Location of Cable Television Facilities
The current purveyor's facilities supplying Renton with cable television service are composed of a receiver, a
headend, a trunk system and a feeder system. The receiver and the headend, which amplifies, processes and
combines signals for distribution by the cable network, are located north of Burien, Washington. The signal
is then transmitted via low-power microwave to a site in Kent, Washington, where it enters the trunk system.
Amplifiers placed at intervals along the cables maintain signal strength. The amplifiers also serve as junction
points where the feeder system taps into the trunk cables. Service drops then provide the final connection
from the feeder line to the subscriber.
Generally following street rights-of-way, the present network encompasses residential neighborhoods to the
east, north, and south. The unserved portion of Renton generally includes the commercial and industrial
areas located in the Green River Valley.
Capacity of Cable Television Facilities
A cable system is not subject to the same capaciry constraints as other utilities. Providing and maintaining the
capacity to serve is the contractual responsibility of the utility. According to the Ciry's franchise agreement,
the purveyor must make service available to all portions of the franchise area. In some circumstances, costs
associated with a line extension may be borne by the service recipient.
The current purveyor offers various packages including as many as 130+ active analog and digital television
channels plus nearly 40 digital music channels, and has the capacity to greatly increase those numbers as well
as the other types of services that they may decide to offer in the future.
Forecasted Conditions - Cable Television
According to the provisions of the current purveyor's franchise agreement with the City, the company must
continue to make cable service available upon request, when reasonable, for any property within the current
or future city limits. Therefore, under the current terms of this franchise, the current purveyor would be
required to provide cable service to projected growth within the City and the remainder of the Planning Area.
Objective U-J: Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunications services within
the City and the remainder of its Planning Area.
Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location impacts, and be collocated on existing structures
of telecommunications facilities be accomplished and towers wherever possible and practical.
in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the
environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development
of a wireless Internet communication grid
Policy U-101. Require that cellular throughout the City for the use and enjoyment of
communication structures and towers be Renton residents, employees, and visitors.
sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic
XII-45
�,�.--
CITY OF RENTON UTILITIES ELEMENT 0 R D I N A N C E N O. 5 0 9 9
11/O1/04
Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition
among telecommunication systems for provision of
current and future telecommunication services.
XII-46
GLOSSARY
Rev. 11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
IX.
GLOSSARY
accessory housing: dwellings constructed within an existing single family home,usually for use as a
rental unit. An "accessory unit" is a separate dwelling, including kitchen, sleeping, and bathroom
facilities. Also lrnown as "mother-in-law apartment."
activity node: an area of clustered higher density land uses.
adaptive use: the utilization of an older building that is no longer suited for its original purpose,but
may be modified and used for a different purpose such as housing. A common example is the conversion
of older public school buildings to rental or condominium apartments.
affordable housing: housing that meets the needs of a household earning at or below eighty percent
(80%)of county median income(adjusted for household size), for which the household pays no more
than thirty percent(30%)of its gross income toward housing costs, including utilities.
aquifer: Groundwater-bearing geologic formation or formations that contain enough saturated
permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells.
aquifer protection area(APA): Zone of capture and recharge area for a well or well field owned or
operated by the City of Renton.
aquifer protection zones: Zones of an APA designated to provide graduated levels of aquifer
protection. Each APA may be subdivided by the City into two aquifer protection zones.
Zone 1: The land area situated between a well or well field owned by the City of Renton and the 365-
day groundwater travel time contour.
Zone 2: The land area situated between the 365-day groundwater travel time contour and the
boundary of the zone of potential capture for a well or well field owned or operated by the City of
Renton.
Protected APA designated Zone 2: If the aquifer supplying water to a well,well field, or spring is
naturally protected by overlying geologic strata,the City of Renton may choose not to subdivide an
APA into two zones. In such a case,the entire APA will be designated as Zone 2.
arterial,minor: right-of-way that serves as a distributor of traffic from a principal arterial to less
important streets, directly to secondary traffic generators such as community shopping areas and high
schools, and serves trips between neighborhoods within a community. Minor streets are more intensive
than collectors,but less intensive than principal arterials.
arterial,principal: right-of-way that connects regional arterials to major activity areas and directly to
traffic destinations. Principal arterials are the most intensive arterial classification, serve major traffic
generators such as the urban Center,major shopping and commercial districts, and move traffic from
community to community.
basin (Water Utility): An area defined by the natural features of the landscape such that any flow of
water in said area will flow toward one low point.
basin(Surface Water Utility): An area drained by a river and its tributaries.
Page 1 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
Best Management Practices (Surface Water Utility): Conservation practices or systems of practices
and management measures that:
a. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste,toxins,
and sediment;
b. Minimize adverse impacts to surface water and groundwater flow, circulation patterns, and to the
chemical,physical, and biological characteristics of wetlands; and
c. Include allowing proper use and storage of fertilizers/pesticides.
bicycle facility: an improvement designed to facilitate accessibility by bicycle, including bicycle trails,
bicycle lanes, storage facilities, etc.
boulevards: typically a broad thoroughfare that is often separated by a landscaped median or center
divider that has potential to function as linear open space. Boulevard designation would imply a higher
priority for landscape, sidewalk, or trail improvements.
capacity: the space to accommodate population growth or increases in employment or residential uses
as determined by the methodology used in the Buildable Lands program.
capacity problem(wastewater utility): When flow rates exceed what the facility is designed to
convey.
capital facilities: as a general definition, structures, improvements,pieces of equipment or other major
assets, including land. City capital facilities are provided by and for public purposes and services.
cell(Cellular Telephone Service): The geographic cellular telephone coverage area, approximately 2 to
10 miles in radius, served by a low-powered transmitters.
cell site(Cellular Telephone Service): A communications site that includes the cellular transmitting
and receiving antennas, cellular base station radios, and interconnecting equipment. This equipment is
necessary to route cellular telephone system through the mobile telephone switching office and connect
to the conventional wireline telephone network.
cell splitting(Cellular Telephone Service): The process of dividing a larger cell into several smaller
units,to provide additional channels within the same cell.
Chemicals(Surface Water Utility): All "Regulated Substances" as defined by the City of Renton in the
Aquifer Protection Ordinance(APO).
circuit: A set of conductors through which an electric current is intended to flow. Also called a "line".
cluster development: a development design technique that concentrates buildings in specific areas on a
site to allow the remaining land to be used for recreation, common open space, and preservation of
environmentally critical areas.
collocation: the concept of placing public facilities at or near the same location to provide increased
public access. One example is the collocation of a public school with a community center.
commercial use: a business or employment activity or other enterprise that is carried out for profit on a
property by the owner,lessee, or licensee.
Page 2 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev. 11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
community: a subarea of the city consisting of residential institutional and commercial land uses and
sharing a common identity(In Renton, for example,the Highlands).
community separator: See"Urban Separator" [REPLACE WITH URBAN SEPARATOR]
commute trip: a trip made from an employee's residence to a worksite for a regularly scheduled work
day.
concurrency: a Growth Management Act requirement that transportation facilities and other
infrastructure, such as water and sewer,needed to maintain adopted Level of Service("LOS") standards,
are available within six years of development at the time of occupancy or within a specified time period.
conductor: A wire or cable intended to carry electric power, supported by poles, towers or other
structures.
neighborhood commercial: small commercial areas providing limited retail goods and services such as
groceries and dry cleaning for nearby customers.
Countywide Planning Policies: as required by GMA,the King County Council adopted a series of
policies that embody a vision of the future of King County. These policies (along with the Framework
Policies) are intended to guide the development of Renton's Comprehensive Plan.
critical areas: wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat, frequently flooded, and
geologically hazardous areas regulated by the City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance.
demand (Water Utility): The quantity of water obtained from the water supply source over a period of
time to meet the needs of domestic, commercial, industrial and public use, and also fire fighting water,
system losses, and miscellaneous other water uses. Demands are normally discussed in terms of flow
rate, such as million gallons per day(mgd) or gallons per minute (gpm). The flow rates can be described
in terms of a volume of water delivered during a certain time period. Flow rates pertinent to the analysis
and design of water systems are:
Average Daily Demand (ADD). The total amount of water delivered to the system in a year
' divided by the number of days in the year. This is further divided into average residential
(ADDR), commercial(ADDC), industrial (ADDI), and unaccounted for(ADDI�demands.
Maximum Month Demand. The total amount of water delivered to the system during the
month of maximum water use.
Peak Hour Demand. The amount of water delivered to the system in the hour of maximum use
usually occurring during the maximum day.
density: the number of swelling units per net acre. Renton bases its density requirements on net density,
in which environmentally sensitive areas,public rights-of-ways, and private access easements are
subtracted from gross acreage before density is calculated.
density bonus: incentive provided to a developer of housing,in exchange for meeting a specified
condition or conditions such as quality of design or provision of a certain type of housing unit or other
use.
Page 3 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/O1/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
detention/retention facilities: Facilities designed either to hold runoff for a short period of time and
then release it to the point of discharge at a controlled rate or to hold water for a considerable length of
time and then consume it by evaporation,plants or infiltration into the ground.
development standards: in respect to any development, fixed requirements or standards imposed by
ordinance and regulation . In Renton, development standards are included in the Renton Municipal Code
Title N, "Development Regulations."
duplex: a residential building containing two attached dwelling units under one roof,located on a single
lot. In the Renton Municipal Code, such units are called"flats."
dwelling unit: one or more rooms located within a structure,designedas and arranged for living
accommodations, and occupied or intended to be occupied by not more than one family and permitted
roomers and boarders, independent from any other family. The existence of a food preparation area and
sanitation facilities within the room or rooms shall be evidence of the existence of a dwelling unit.
Dormitories, institutional housing, and other group quarters are not counted as dwelling units.
equalizing storage (Water Utility): Equalizing storage provides the difference between the capacity of
the sources of supply and the maximum demand rate (generally considered the highest use hour of the
hottest day of the year). In water systems which service a large number of residences, the demand for
water varies hourly and supply facilities are sized to meet the average rate of the maximum day demand.
The maximum hour demand rate is typically about twice the average maximum day rate. If equalizing
storage is not available to provide water during peak hours, the supply facilities and major pipelines
would have to be sized for the maximum hour demands. However, during non-peak hours, much of the
supply capacity would not be used. Instead, equalizing storage facilities are used to make up the
difference between maximum hour and maximum day demand.
The stored water is released when demand exceeds the supply, and replenished when the supply exceeds
demand. In this way supply facilities and pipelines can be smaller than if equalizing storage is not
available,and,therefore,lower costs for supply and pipeline facilities are obtained.
feeder system(Cable Television Service): The line that carries the signal from a trunk line amplifier to
the subscriber's service drop.
fiber optic cable: A multi-layered cable composed of fine strands of glass fibers capable of transmitting
large quantities of coded data by means of modulated light rather than electronic signals. It is preferred as
a medium for television signals as it can carry more signals with less dissipation.
fireflow: The rate of flow of water required during fire fighting.
fire storage: Reservoir capacity required to meet fire flows.
force main: A sanitary sewer main that utilizes artificial means (pressure)to transport waste. A force
main usually moves sewage from a lower elevation to or across a higher elevation. A lift station typically
pumps sewage from one basin through a force main to another basin.
functional plans: city departments prepare planning documents that establish long-range goals and
objectives to guide their operations and capital development requests. These plans,referred to as
functional plans,typically represent the ideal goals for the department in providing urban services and
facilities.
Page 4 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev. li/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
gate station (Natural Gas Service): The point at which gas from Northwest Pipeline enters the Puget
Sound Energy system, where oderant is added for safety, pressure is reduced to 200 to 300 psi, and the
gas is metered.
gateway: a point of entry that identifies a transition between different land uses, landscapes and
jurisdictional boundaries and enhances a feeling of anticipation and arrival for the approaching traveler.
geologically hazardous: areas which may be prone to one or more of the following conditions--
erosion, flooding, landslides,coal mine hazards,or seismic activity.
gravity sewer: A sanitary sewer main installed with the intention of utilizing gravity or "down hill flow"
to move the waste. The maximum capacity for a gravity sewer is the volume of flow that can be carried
in a sewer at a depth to diameter ratio of 0.70.
greenbelt: an area intended for open space,recreation,very low density residential uses, agriculture,
geographic relief between land uses,or other low intensity uses.
Growth Management Act(GMA)of 1990: a law passed by the Washington State Legislature in 1990
and amended periodically thereafter that mandates comprehensive planning in designated counties and
cities statewide. (RCW 36.70A)
hazardous waste: Any wastes included in the State of Washington, Department of Ecology Dangerous
Waste Regulations, chapter 173-303 of the Washington Administrative Code(WAC).
headend(Cable Television Service): The electronic equipment that amplifies and processes television
signals from all sources. After being assigned a channel,the signals leave via the trunk system.
heavy industrial: a type of land use including manufacturing processes using raw materials, extractive
land uses,and any industrial uses that typically are incompatible with adjacent uses due to noise, odor,
toxic chemicals,or other activities which could pose a hazard to public health and safety.
high-occupancy vehicle(HO�: generally, a vehicle carrying two or more people, including a carpool,
vanpool, or bus.
housing unit: any dwelling unit,housekeeping unit, guest room, dormitory, or single-occupancy unit.
impact fees: a fee imposed on developers to pay for the community's costs of providing services to a
new development. Such charges are an extension of efforts to make new development pay for their
impact on the community. Impact fees may also involve some effort to predict the total cost of the
community for servicing the new development and relate it to the revenues that will be produced by the
development once it is completed.
impervious surface: A hard surface area which either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil
mantle under natural conditions prior to development, and/or a hard surface that causes water to run off
the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flaw from the flow present under natural
conditions prior to development. Common examples include,but are not limited to,roof tops,walkways,
patios,decks,driveways,parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,packed
earthen materials,and oiled,macadam,or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of
storm water.
industrial: a type of land use characterized by production,manufacturing, distribution or fabrication
activities.
Page 5 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev. 11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
infill development: development consisting of either construction on one or more lots in an area that is
mostly developed, or new construction between two existing structures.
infill housing: construction of new dwelling units on vacant or underutilized parcels in built-up areas.
Because utilities,transit, and other infrastructure are already in place,the costs and impacts of new units
are generally lower than for development on raw land.
infiltration(Wastewater Utility): Infiltration is the entrance of ground water into the sanitary sewer
system through cracks,pores,breaks, and defective joints in the sewer piping network.
inflow: Inflow refers to direct flow of storm water into sanitary sewer systems through hookups from
storm water collection facilities and illegal connections.
infrastructure: the underlying foundation, or basic framework of a city. The system of essential
services,utilities,public and community facilities, e.g. water, sewerage,power,roads, schools,health
facilities etc.,which are necessary to enable urban development to function.
institution: a structure(or structures)and related grounds used by organizations providing educational,
medical, social, and recreational services to the community such as hospitals,vocational or fine arts
schools,child care centers,whether operated for nonprofit or profit-making purposes; and nonprofit
organizations such as colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools,community centers
and clubs,private clubs,religious facilities,museums, and institutes for advanced study.
intensive office: mid to high-rise office development including structured parking typically located in
areas with regional transportation access.
intermediate pressure(ip)distribution main: Underground lines varying from 1.25 to 6 inches in
diameter. Pressure averages 35 psi.
jobs/housing balance: a term representing the ratio between jobs and housing within a specified area.
The jobs/housing balance can influence housing costs and transportation demand.
land use zoning: traditionally, a technical or physical approach to the segregation of incompatible land
uses, such as residential and industrial use,through systems of land use and development controls. More
recently,the techniques have emphasized reinforcing position relationships between compatible land
uses such as residential and neighborhood commercial. The contemporary approach also emphasizes the
close relationship between transportation and land use to more effectively respond to accessibility,
reduction of infrastructure costs,urban design,air,noise, and water pollution, energy conservation, and
conservation of resource lands.
landfill: A disposal facility, or part of a facility,where solid waste is permanently placed in or on land
and which is not a land spreading disposal facility.
large scale multi-family: a residential building, or group of buildings that contain more than four
dwelling units in each building.
level-of-service(I.OS): a qualitative rating of how well some unit of transportation supply(e.g., street,
intersection, sidewalk,bikeway,transit route, ferry)meets its current or projected demand.
lift station: A sewage pumping facility that consists of a wet well for collecting wastewater,mechanical
equipment such as pumps, valves and piping, electrical and control equipment, and a force main. The
Page 6 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev. 11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
maximum capacity for a lift station is equal to the peak, wet weather flow that the largest pump within
the lift station has been designed to convey.
light industrial: a type of land use including small scale or less intensive production,manufacturing,
distribution or fabricating activities. Some office activities and supporting convenience retail activities
may also be included.
looping main(Natural Gas Service): A main which connects to a supply line at both ends,thereby
providing an alternate route for natural gas to travel to an area needing additional supply.
manufactured housing: a broad term including mobile homes,modular homes, and other"factory
built" housing. The main distinction between manufactured homes and site-built homes is that
manufactured homes are created in one or more parts away from the site, and then transported to it. "Red
Seal"manufactured homes are built to HUD standards,with the chassis included as a permanent part of
the home,although the axles must be removed when the home is installed. These homes,however, are
built so that they may be placed on a permanent foundation. "Gold Seal"modular homes are constructed
in a factory in several pieces that may be smaller or less complete than the pieces of a"Red Seal"
manufactured home. Gold Seal homes are built to the specifications of the Uniform Building Code,and
are placed on a permanent foundation, similar to a "stick-built" home. Unlike Red Seal homes,the
chassis for transportation is not a permanent part of the home. Mobile homes, as opposed to
manufactured or modular homes, are typically located in established mobile home parks and were built
before HUD standards for manufactured housing went into effect June 15, 1976.
master plan: a specific land use plan focused on a particular site that identifies site access and general
improvements and is intended to guide growth and development on the site over a number of years.
Metro: Metro is a county-wide agency run by Metropolitan King County that provides regularly
scheduled public transit service(both express and local service),park and ride lots,vanpools,ride-
sharing,and customized service to meet people with special needs. Metro is also a regional sewage
treatment agency charged with the collection,treatment, and disposal of sewage from the City of Renton
and much of King County.
minimum density: a development standard that sets the least amount of density permitted in a
residential zone and results in a more efficient use of urban land than might otherwise be attained
through market forces.
mitigation(Surface Water Utility): Avoiding,minimizing or compensating for adverse wetland
impacts. Mitigation,in the following order of preference,is:
a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation,by
using appropriate technology,or by taking deliberate steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing,rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during
the life of the action;
e. Compensating for the impact by restoring or providing substitute resources or environments;
Page 7 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
£ Monitoring the impact and the compensation project and taking appropriate corrective measures.
Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures.
mixed use: the presence of more than one category of use in a structure or development project, for
example, a mixture of residential units and retail or offices in the same building or if in separate
buildings, in close proximity to one another.
mode: types of transportation available for use, such as a bicycle, an automobile, or a bus.
mode-split: the proportion of total persons using a particular mode of travel. In this document,mode-
split generally refers to the percentage of people using public transportation as opposed to other
motorized modes.
multi-family use: a structure or portion of a structure containing two or more dwelling units.
multi-modal: referring to accessibility by a variety of travel modes,typically pedestrian,bicycle, transit,
and automobile modes,but may also include water and air transport modes.
natural gas: For the most part methane,a naturally occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and non-
hydrocarbon gases found in porous geologic formations beneath the earth's surface, often in association
with petroleum.
net density: a calculation of the number of housing units that would be allowed on a property after
sensitive areas,public streets, and private access easements are subtracted from the gross area(gross
acres minus streets, easements,and sensitive areas multiplied by allowable housing units per acre). This
calculation applies to residential uses only.
Northwest Pipeline: Interstate pipeline providing gas to Puget Sound Energy. Pressure varies from 600
to 900 psi in two parallel pipes,26 and 30 inches in diameter.
off-site release rates(Surface Water Utility): As a result of development,the peak release rate of
water from the developed property during the design storm.
on-street parking: parking spaces in the rights-of-way.
open space: any area of land, or water which provides physical or visual relief from the developed
environment. Open space may be essentially unimproved and set aside,designated or reserved for public
use or enjoyment,or for the private use and enjoyment of adjacent property owners. Open space may
also consist of undeveloped or developed areas including urban plazas,parks,pedestrian corridors,
landscaping,pastures,woodlands,greenbelts,wetlands, and other natural areas or street rights-of-way
which provide visual relief within developed areas. The term does not include driveway,parking lots, or
other surfaces designed for vehicular travel.
outfall: The point, location, or structure where wastewater or drainage discharges from a sewer, drain,
or other conduit.
P-1 Channel: An existing channel in the lower Green River Valley that transports the surface water
flows of Springbrook Creek to the Black River Pump Station.
• peak flow (wastewater utility): T'he maximum amount of sewage, either actual or estimated, that must
be transported through the system in a given time (usually in gallons per minute). Peak flow is usually
Page 8 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
measured or calculated during the wettest time of the year when rain and high ground water add inflow
and infiltration to the normal flow of the system at the time of day when domestic use is the greatest.
peak hour: one-hour interval within the peak period when travel demand is usually highest,e.g. 7:30-
8:30 a.m. and 4:30-5:30 p.m.
pedestrian-orientated: a type of development where the location and access to buildings, types of uses
permitted on the street level, and design of building facades are based on the needs of people on foot.
pedestrian facility: an improvement designed to facilitate accessibility by foot or wheelchair, including
sidewalks,curb ramps,crosswalks,oveipasses and undercrossings, etc.
pipeline: Buried pipe systems(including all pipe,pipe joints, fittings,valves,manholes, sumps, and
appurtenances that are in contact with the substance being transported)utilized for the conveyance of
regulated substances.Pipelines include,but are not limited to, sanitary sewers, side sewers, leachate
pipelines, and product pipelines, such as petroleum.
Planning Area: A geographic area as specifically defined on a map in a comprehensive plan that is a
logical area for expansion of the system. Conversion of a planning area to a utility service area requires
King County approval of an amendment to a comprehensive plan.
Potential Annexation Area(PAA): The area within the Urban Growth Area that is not already
incorporated as a city and is designated for future annexation by specific cities.
pre-development levels(Surface Water Utility): The rate of flow under a design storm occurrence that
would occur in absence of the planned development.
pressure zone(water utility): A water system subsection operating from one source at a common
hydraulic elevation.
public facilities: streets,roads,highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems,traffic signals,
domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems,park and recreational facilities, schools and
public buildings.
public works: The City of Renton's Planning/Building/Public Works Department.
recyclables(Solid Waste Utility): Newspaper,uncoated mixed paper,aluminum, glass and metal, food
and beverage containers,Polyethylene terepthalate(PET#1)plastic bottles,High Density Polyethylene
(HDPE#2)plastic bottles, and such other materials that the City and contractor determine to be
recyclable.
rezoning: rezoning is a change in the designation or boundaries of property as shown on the Official
Zoning Map and defined in Title N of the Renton Municipal Code. Rezoning is a legislative act and can
be legal only if enacted by the governing body. Rezoning can take two forms: 1)a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment(revision or modification of the zoning text and citywide map), or 2)a change in the zoning
classification of a particular parcel or parcels,without a change in the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
rights-of-way: the rights-of-way is the right to pass over or otherwise use designated property. It
usually refers to a strip of land legally established far public use by pedestrians,vehicles, or utilities.
Page 9 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
runoff: that portion of precipitation that flows over land surface and enters a natural drainage system or
constructed storm sewer system during and immediate following a storm.
rural area: a sparsely developed area located outside of the Urban Growth Area, where the land is
undeveloped or primarily used for agricultural, forestry,resource extraction,very low density residential
uses,or open space purposes.
sanitary sewer: A piping system that carries liquid and waterborne wastes from residences, commercial
buildings, industrial plants, and institutions, together with minor quantities of ground, storm, and surface
waters that are not admitted intentionally.
SEPA: See State Environmental Policy Act.
service area: A geographic area within which service to customers is available as specifically defined
on a map in a utilities service plan and approved by King County.
service drop (Cable Television Service): Smaller diameter cable that runs from a feeder line to the
subscriber's television.
side sewer: In plumbing,the extension from the building drain to the public sewer or other place of
disposal. Also called house connection or side sewer(private). A side sewer stub is that portion of the
side sewer between the collector sewer and the individual property line.
single-occupant vehicle(SO�: a vehicle carrying only one person.
solid waste: a general term for discarded materials destined for disposal,but not discharged to a sewer
or to the atmosphere.
special benefit districts: subareas of a community designated by city ordinance to assess payrnents for
construction or installation of public facilities which primarily benefit the property owners within the
district.
special needs housing: this category refers to housing that is provided for low income or indigent
persons and,where applicable,their dependents who,by virtue of disability or other personal factors,
face serious impediments to independent living and who require special assistance and services in order
to sustain appropriate housing on a permanent, long-term or transitional basis.
State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA): the state law passed in 1971 requiring state and local
agencies to consider environmental impacts in the decision-making process.
storm sewer or storm drain: a sewer that carries storm water and surface water, street wash and other
wash waters,or drainage,but excludes domestic wastewater and industrial wastes.
� storm water: water originating from precipitation, surface runoff, shallow ground water, or other
drainage that does not include domestic wastewater or industrial wastes.
strip commercial: an area occupied by businesses along an arterial street, located in one-story
structures or platted lots and/or small shopping centers ananged in a line and set back from the street to
allow front of store parking lots with individual draiveway entrances and indivisual parking.
structured parking: vehicle parking within a building having one or mare stories.
Page ]0 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.11/Ol/04 ORDINANCE NO. 5099
surface parking: open lots or grounds with at-grade vehicle parking facilities.
townhouse: a form of ground-related housing where individual dwelling units are attached along at least
one common wall to at least one other dwelling unit. Each dwelling unit occupies space from the ground
to the roof.
transfer of development rights (TDRs): a program in which the unused portion of a "sending"
property's zoned capacity--one of the separable rights of property--is sold to the developer of a
"receiving" site,who is allowed to add the capacity to the zoned limit of that site.
transfer station: permanent, �xed, supplemental collection and transportation facility,used by persons
and route collection vehicles to deposit collected solid waste from off-site into a larger transfer vehicle
for transport to a solid waste handling facility. Transfer stations may also include recycling facilities and
compaction/baling systems.
transit: public transportation by public bus, light rail,heavy rail, and commuter rail transport,but not
fenies or vanpools.
transportation demand management(TDM): refers to developing policies plus public and private
programs to manage the demand placed on transportation supply. TDM measures are frequently directed
toward increasing the use of transit and carpools.
transportation systems management(TSM): accommodating transportation demand by using the
existing supply more efficiently and by emphasizing lower cost improvements that can be implemented
quickly. For example,converting a general purpose traffic lane into a transitway might increase the
person-carrying capacity of a highway more easily and quickly than widening the highway for additional
traffic lanes.
trunk system(Cabel Television Service): The cables that carry signals from the headend to the feeder
lines. Since the signal loses strength as it travels down the cable, a series or cascade of amplifiers,
located at intervals along its length,boost signal strength.
undeveloped rights-of-way: any undeveloped portion of a strip of land legally established for the use of
pedestrians,vehicles, or utilities.
upzoning: a change in the zoning classification of land to a classification allowing more intensive
development, such as a change from single family to multi-family.
urban center: defined by the Countywide Planning Policies,recognized by the Puget Sound Regional
Council, and so designated by City Council Resolution,the Urban Center is an area of Renton with
existing and/or future high employment concentration,residential use at high density,and accessibility.
These areas promote non-SOV mobility,reduce sprawl,and maximize benefits of existing public
inveshnent.
urban growth area: area designated by the City and endorsed by the County for development over the
next twenty years as required by the Growth Management R.ct. Urban growth patterns should not occur
outside these areas.
urban separator: corridors of natural areas or very low density rural development between higher
density urban areas. Examples include lands useful for open space,wildlife habitat,recreation trails and
Page 11 of 12
GLOSSARY
Rev.l l/Ol/04
ORDINANCE NO. 5099
connection of critical areas, agricultural uses, or lands which have a rural character. Also sometimes
referred to as"Community Separator."
utilities: All lines and facilities related to the provision, distribution, collection,transmission,or
disposal of water, storm and sanitary sewage, oil, gas,power, information,telecommunication and
telephone cable,and includes facilities for the generation of electricity.
Vision 2020: Puget Sound Regional Council's 1990 adopted regional comprehensive vision that
describes linking high-density residential and employment centers throughout the region by high capacity
transit and promoting a multi-modal transportation system.
wastewater: The spent or used water of a community or industry that contains dissolved and suspended
contaminants that cannot be discharged directly to a lake, stream, or river.
wetlands: areas characterized by the presence of surface or groundwater at a frequency or duration to
support vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. For the purposes of inventory, incentives,
and non-regulatory programs,those lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the
water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For the purposes of
regulation,wetlands are defined by the Federal Manual for the Regulation and Delineation of
Jurisdictional Wetlands pursuant to this Chapter, Section 4-32-3.C. Wetlands created or restored as part
of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Wetlands intentionally created for purposes other than
wetland mitigation, including but not limited to, stormwater management,wastewater treatment or
landscape amenities,drainage ditches are not considered regulated wetlands.
wildlife habitat: an area characterized by wildlife that forage,nest, spawn, or migrate through, in search
of food and shelter.
yard waste(Solid Waste Utility): Includes leaves, grass,prunings and clippings of woody as well as
fleshy plants. Materials larger than two inches(2") in diameter and four feet(4') in length shall not be
considered yard waste.
Page 12 of 12
CITY OF REN ON
Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map
6z'11 0� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
♦ A ♦ P/B/PW Technical Services
,�y G. Del Rosario
�A �. r O Draft Revised 01 November 2004
CENTER DESIGNATIONS
u� Urban Center Downtown
Center Village
0 2000 4000 -Urban Center -North
1 :24000
EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS
Employment Area - Industrial
Employment Area - Valley
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATIONS
® Commercial Neighborhood
Commercial/Office/Residential
- Commercial Corridor
City Limits
• — • — Urban Growth Boundary
ORDINANCE NO. 5099
RESIDENTIAL
N ,h
Residential Low Density
Residential Single Family
Residential Medium Density
Residential Multi -Family
CENTER DESIGNATIONS
u� Urban Center Downtown
Center Village
0 2000 4000 -Urban Center -North
1 :24000
EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS
Employment Area - Industrial
Employment Area - Valley
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATIONS
® Commercial Neighborhood
Commercial/Office/Residential
- Commercial Corridor
City Limits
• — • — Urban Growth Boundary
ORDINANCE NO. 5099