The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutORD 4734 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON I ORDINANCE NO. 4 7 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 1998 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S 1995 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MAPS AND DATA IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton has heretofore adopted and filed a "Comprehensive Plan" and the City Council of Renton has implemented and amended sa'id "Comprehensive Plan" from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports and j records; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heretofore duly recommended to the City Council, from time to time, certain amendments to the City's "Comprehensive Plan"; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act, has been required to review its "Comprehensive Plan"; and WHEREAS, the City has held a public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations to the City Council, including implementing policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly determined after due consideration of the testimony and evidence before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive Plan"; and WHEREAS, such modification and elements for the "Comprehensive Plan" being in the best interest and for the public benefit; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4734 ' SECTION L The above findings and recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The "Comprehensive Plan," maps, data and reports in support of the "Comprehensive Plan" are hereby modified, amended and adopted as said "Comprehensive Plan" consisting of the following elements: Land Use, Land Use Map, Housing, Transportation, and Utility, as shown on the attached E�ibits A through F and incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION III. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City's "Comprehensive Plan" and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforementioned 1998 amendments. SECTION IV. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as provided by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City Clerk of the City of Renton. SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 77thday of JuTy , 1998. � . T , Marilyn J. e er en, City Clerk �' APPROVE�BY THE MAYOR this 77thday Of ��, , I998. ' � . � J Tanner, Mayor 2 � ORDINANCE NO. 4 7 3 4 i Approved as to form: I! La ce J. Warren, Attorney DateofPublication: July 31, 1998 (Summary) ORD.730:07/21/98:as. 3 .. � � Attachment A: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments � Amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change the designations of the following properties. A. Property located at 1105 Sunset Blvd.(Potoshnik/Newton) from Convenience Commercial to Residential Multi-family Infill Land Use Design�tion with concurrent re-zoning to Residential Multi-family-Infill(RM-I) as shown on the following map. 'I � h St � �s � - d � .�r��e N� P°�� w z �, =�v > Q � o.� � � �� .4 �� Q Amendment 98-M- 1 0 �50' 300' I�� Neighborhoods ac Strategic Planning p • � ♦ ED/N/SP 1:��U O O T. Schlepp, R. MacOnie 18 July 1988 �� RM-I Land Use and 2oning . . ; .k . . . " � �" � �� '� L _ ,. . 4. C. Property located on Rainier Blvd. from�'Riiral' Residential and Residential Single Family to Employment Area Commercial with concurrent rezoning to Commercial Arterial (CA) as shown on the following map. � � � � � S 121st � � > � Q . ' � � S � �0 -I-' Z D -� f� < 00 NW 7th � �0 � ¢ z � � -' Renton Municipal E- Airport I I r S�` � 6� . � N � °-� ..... -o � 2� NW �h I Amendment 98-M-3 ° 200' 400' 1:2 4D0 lYeighborhoods & Strategic Planning � ' � � TDSchlepp, R. MacOnte � EAC Land Use and CA Zoning IB July 1998 --- Renton City Liroits E. Property located at Lake Youngs adjacent to�et�ovitsky Road from County designation of Rural � to Urban and apply a City Residential Single Family land use designation according to the ', following map: li S 2 lst S I SE 201st St SE. 202nd St � > a M •/•/./. . . . . . . . . r N N > �95�py .. .. ... � �� N �.�'�e n' ~ S�- ¢ s �' v .............. '�: .`. .`:: \.: Amendment 98—M-6 o soo' soo' Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1:3 6 Q Q � �„ � TD Schl pp, R. MacOnte O RS Lnnd Use 18 July 1898 —.—._ Urban Growth Boundnry � G. Property located at N 8th St., Park Ave. N and Garden Ave. N. (Boeing) Change from Employment Area Industrial to Employment Area Office with concurrent re-zoning to Commercial Office(CO)according to the following map. � a� � � � � p`' �- N 8th - � � � � � .. � 0 � N th S . � 0 400' 800 1:4,800 Amendment 98-M- 9 •ONeighborhoods & Strategic Planning ♦ ED/N/SP T. Schlepp, R. MacOn[e 17 7uly 1898 ..'�..T.� EA� Land Use and CO Zoning S � I. Property located at I-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard (Pan Abode.) Change from Employment Area Industrial to Center Office Residential with concurrent rezoning to Center �, Office Residential (COR)according to the following map. ' —" —LaTse — — — — NE 48 — —Washirrg-ton– — — — �.�' — — � .�? � — � ...�� ... � NE 3 h 1 , � � 0 — � �� 4 St � — � � •�,fi � a � � a� � � 4� Pan Abode Amendment ° 400' 800' Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning 1:4 800 ♦ L� ♦ ED/N/SP � T. Schlepp, R. Maconie � COR Lnnd Use nnd Zonin 1? July 1988 9 --- Renton City LiMits � . ATTACHMENT B LAND USE ELEMENT POLICIES AND TEXT I The Land Use Element policies and text are amended as follows. Policies not listed remain unchanged. RESIDENTIAL Summary: The purpose of the Residential policies is to provide a vision for future development in Renton's neighborhoods and throughout the City. The Residential policies address the location of housing development, housing densities,non-residential uses allowed in residential areas, site design, and housing types in neighborhoods. (See Public Facilities Section for policiss on schools, churches, and other facilities in residential areas. See Housing Element for policies relating to densities, housing types and neighborhoods) Policy LU-11. Future residential growth should be accommodated through: a. development of new neighborhoods in environmentally suitable vacant land on the hills and plateaus surrounding downtown; b. development of vacant parcels in Renton's established neighborhoods; c. development of single family/multi-family mix neighborhoods in appropriate locations; d. new multi-family development located in Renton's downtown, as infill in existing multi- family areas, and in specified Centers; e. mixed use commercial/residential projects in employment areas. Policy LU-16. In established single family neighborhoods and new low density areas, encourage single family housing types. Policy LU-16.1 In areas bordering Center designations and in areas with an existing mix of residential use types encourage a mix of single family and small scale multi-family housing types designed to look like single family development with ground related entries, i.e. duplex. triplex, fourplex. Policy LU-17. Larger multi-family development projects are encouraged in the downtown area and the Center Office Residential and the Multi-family Residential-Infill designations. Policy LU-18. The City should encourage large lot single family development in Rural Residential designations providing a more rural life style in environmentally sensitive,habitat-valuable, or agriculturally resource laden areas. The City should discourage more intensive platting patterns in these areas. Policy LU-20. Encourage enhancement and stability in those neighborhoods which have significant numbers of legal non-conforming uses through the designation of Neighborhood Conservation areas. Policy LU-21.Within Neighborhood Conservation areas encourage developments which increase the percentage of conforming uses to allow eventual transition of these areas. Transition of uses should be implemented in a manner which recognizes the overall character of the areas while at the same time encouraging the eventual transition of the uses. Policy LU-22. Encourage the city and neighborhoods to jointly work toward identifying Neighborhood Conservation areas as needed. Discussion: This category is intended to be applied within one of the existing land use designations to help stabilize neighborhoods in transition and to revitalize and enhance their appearance. The LUFINAL.DOC\ _i_ :� . . , I Policy LU-49. Non-residential structures may have dimensions larger than residential sfizctures but should be compatible in design and dimensions with 'surrounding residential development. Policy LU-50. Residential neighborhoods may be considered for the Residential Options Designation if they meet three of the following criteria: a. The area already has a mix of small scale multi-family units or had long standing duplex or low density multi-family zoning; b. Development patterns are established. c. Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potentiai. d. Few new roads or major utility upgrades will be needed with future development. e. The site is located adjacent to a Center designation. Policy LU-51. The net development densities should be 10 dwelling units per acre. If 100% of the dwelling units are detached, a density bonus may be allowed to a maximum of 13 dwelling units per acre. Policy LU-52. Minimum net development densities should be 7 dwelling units per acre. Policy LU-53. Detached single family housing, townhouses, and small scale multi-family units should be allowed in Residential Options. Policy LU-54. A maximum of 50% of units allowed within an individual RO development may consist of attached units which includes townhouses,and small scale multi-family units. Policy LU-55. Development in Residential Options should be compatible with existing development patterns and be sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. Development standards should reflect single family neighborhood characteristics such as ground related orientation, coordinated structural design, and private yards. Policy LU-56. Non-residential structures, should be clustered and connected within the overall development through the organization of roads, blocks, yards, other central features and amenity features to create a neighborhood. Policy LU-57. Areas may be mapped Residential Planned Neighborhood on the Land Use Map . where the site meets the following criteria: a. adjacent to major arterial(s); b. adjacent to employment area and/or Centers; c. part of a designation totaling over 20 acres (acreage may be in separate ownership); d. site is buffered from single family areas or other existing incompatible uses; and e. development within the density and unit type range is achievable given environmental constraints. Policy LU-58. Density in the Residential Planned Neighborhood designation should be in the range of 8 to 18 dwelling units per net acre. Policy LU-59. A minimum of 50% of a project in the RPN designation should consist of the following primary residential types: traditional detached, zero lot line detached, or townhouses with , yards which are designed to reflect a single family character. Policy LU-60. Townhouse building clusters which qualify as a primary residential type should be limited in size so that the mass and scale within the cluster retains a single family character. Limits LCJFINAL.DOC\ -3- . � II Policy LU-111.1. Residential uses are intended to connect to other uses in the Center through design features such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces. Policy LU-116. While mixes of uses are allowed in the Center, commercial and office uses are the preferred uses for this area. Portion moved to Residential in Centers-General,becoming Policy LU-111.1. Policy LU-117. New garden style multifamily development should be discouraged. [Density - Reserved pending development of code language) Policy LU-i21. While mixes of uses are allowed in the Center commercial/light industrial uses which implement the regional growth policies are the preferred uses for this area. Policy LU-123. New garden style multifamily development will be discouraged. [Density - Reserved for development of code language] LU-146. Adequate amounts of land suitable for all types of industrial, light industrial, office and commercial uses should be available for present and future development. Using the growth assumptions, criteria for determining "adequate amounts of land" for the employment area should be based on the following: [a through d-No change. e-repealed.] Objective LU-AA: Provide for commercial uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center downtown designations. Policy LU-171. Reserved(policy repealed) Policy LU-172. Reserved(policy repealed) Policy LU-173. Residential development should generally not be allowed in this designation. Policy LU-178. Retail and/or service uses should comprise a majority of the total development within Employment Area-Commercial designations. Policy LU-179. A unified_form of commercial development should be encouraged through site standards,including: a. minimum lot depth of 200 feet, b.maximum height of 4-6 stories, c. parking to the side or rear of the building, d. maximum setbacks which will allow incorporating a landscape buffer,and e. common signage and lighting requirements. Policy LU-212.4. Non-employment-based uses such as residential, are prohibited in the Renton Valley. LLTFINAL.DOC\ -5- � _t ATTACHME NT C HOUSING ELEMENT POLICIES AND TEXT The Housing Element policies and text are amended as follows. Policies not listed remain unchanged. Policy H-70 Reserved(existing.text repeal) Existing Housing Stock Renton's existing housing stock is the dominant feature of the residential neighborhoods in the City. It creates much of the existing character of the community and will provide a sigriificant proportion of the middle and moderate income housing in the City in the future. In some cases development will occur in existing neighborhoods. Existing housing may be demolished and replaced with new commercial development or higher density residential development. In some cases the economic development objectives of the City or the vision of more intensive urban residential development, particularly in single family neighborhoods will appear to contradict the goal of preserving and protecting existing housing stock. To resolve these apparent conflicts, policy objectives will need to be weighed and balanced to further the Mission Statement of the City(see Vision Chapter). The existing housing stock includes a number of units which by virtue of their condition; age or location may be subject to demolition or change of use over the next 20 years. The City should consider measures to retain as much of this housing as possible. Currently the City enforces building maintenance codes through a complaint based system. The City also is active in funding two programs through the Community Development Block Grants designed to prevent deterioration of . housing in Renton. Quality Of Life Renton is characterized by a variety of stable single family and multi-family neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are largely defined by residential subdivisions, public schools, and other community facilities and amenities which serve them. Over the next twenty years, as the City becomes more densely developed, neighborhoods are expected to become more oriented to the Neighborhood and Community Centers which serve them with commercial services,transit, and community services. Neighborhoods are always impacted in some way by new development. The focus of these policies is to develop strategies to encourage quality development and re-development in neighborhoods to accommodate Renton's regional fair share of growth and improve the quality of life for Renton residents. ' Development which occurs on pre-existing lots or on lots created by a short plat process is expected to continue to occur in the City. With the exception of the annexation areas, the majority of new development will occur on small sites within existing neighborhoods. The quality of life, measured by issues such as noise, traffic, compatible land uses, and neighborhood character and amenities, should be maintained or even improved as development occurs. Development of small unused parcels or redevelopment of properties is a particular concern within existing neighborhoods. Projects need to be particularly sensitive to the character of surrounding development. They should be in scale and reserve the , p privacy of adJommg properties. Since development will be occurring at slightly higher densities in many neighborhoods, however, existing lot sizes will not set a standard for the new development. A mix of lot sizes and unit types will instead set a new standard. HEFINAL.DOC\ � , . Policy H-84. Promote quality development in new neighborhoods. Strategy H-84.1. Encourage single family subdivisions with quality pedestrian and transit connections within newly developing areas. Policy H-90. Identify sites within mixed use areas which are appropriate for residential deveioprnents. Policy H-94. Improve the quality of life in residential developments by encouraging practical design, and amenities which would contribute to good management practices. Strategy H-94.1. Reserved Repeal Strategy H-94.1. Objective H-N: Increase the percentage of homeownership in Renton's neighborhoods HEFINAL.DOC\ I ATTACHMENT D UTILITY ELEMENT POLICIES The Utility Element Policies are amended as follows. Policies not listed remain unchanged. Policy U-24. The owners of all properties, located in unincorporated portions of the Renton Planning Area and outside of municipal service areas, should agree to develop in accordance with the City's development standards, if granted City utilities, except in the cases of threat to public health and safety. Policy U-45. Allow extensions of water service, without annexation, to areas outside of the city limits: 1) when such areas are within the City's water service area, or 2) when no other reasonable service is available AND it is determined by the City and/or State Department of Health that a public health emergency exists or is imminent. Policy U-69. Allow the extension of sanitary sewer services within the City's Potential Annexation Area according to such criteria as the City may require. Sanitary sewer services shall not be established within another sewer service district which provides sanitary sewer service except by � agreement with that sewer service district. UFINAL.DOC\ I ATTACHMENT E, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, POLICIES & TEXT The Transportation Element policies and tegt are amended as follows. Policies not listed remain unchanged. Table 1.4 is amended to read as follows. TABLE 1.4 RENTON ARTERIAL PLAN 2010 n�RovE�rrrs 1. Park Avenue North-Bronson Way North to North 10�'Street arterial widening 2. Houser Way Relocated-Sunset Boulevard to North 8�'Street new arterial 3. Sunset Boulevazd/Houser Way Connection grade separation 4. CBD Transportation and Streetscape improvements: Bronson Way - South 2°a Street to Sunset Boulevard arterial widening Main Avenue South - Grady Way to South 2nd Street arterial widening South 2"—d Street - Rainier Avenue to Main Avenue South revise street network CBD Streetscape street improvements 5. Lake Washington Boulevard/May Creek Bridge bridge replacement 6. Monster Road Bridge bridge replacement 7. Oakesdale Avenue Southwest - Southwest 16�'to Southwest 27ti' new arterial 8. Northeast 3�Street-Sunset Boulevard to Monterey Drive Northeast arterial widening 9. South Grady Way-Rainier Avenue to Talbot Road South(SR S 15) arterial improvements 10. Lind Avenue Southwest- Southwest 16�'to Southwest 43ra Street arterial widening 11. Southwest 16�Street-Oakesdale Avenue Southwest to Lind Avenue Southwest arterial widening 12. Oakesdale Avenue Southwest-Southwest 2'7�'Street to Southwest 31�Street new arterial 13 Southwest 16�Street—Commuter Rail Station Access New local access street 14 Duvall Avenue Northeast - Sunset Boulevard to Renton City Limits arterial widening 2010 t0 2015 IMPROVEMENTS 15 Puget Drive Southeast-Jones Place Southeast to Edmonds Avenue Southeast arterial widening 16 SR-167/East Valley Road new off-ramp POST 20-YEAR IMPROVEMENTS 17 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest - Monster Road to SR-900 arterial widening 18. North�Street-Logan Avenue to Sunset Boulevard revise street network 19. Grady Way/Rainier Avenue grade separation 20. Talbot Road - Southwest 43rd to Renton City Limits arterial widening OTHER JURISDICI'ION IMPROVEMENTS TtJKWILA: 21. Grady Way/Southcenter Boulevard/I-405 Ramps arterial and ramp realignment 22. Interurban Avenue-Grady Way to Southcenter Boulevard arterial widening 23. SR-181/South 180v'Street -(Southwest 43ra Street in Renton) arterial widening 24. Strander Boulevard-SR-181 to Oakesdale Avenue Southwest ost 201 � 5) new artenal KENT: 25. Lind Avenue Southwest-Southwest 43ra Street to East Valley Road new arterial 26. South 192nd/South 19�Street-East Valley Road to Orillia Road South new arterial KirrG Courr�-r: 27. South 192°d Street-SR-515 to 140�Avenue Southeast new arterial 28. South 192°d StreedSouth 200�Street-East Valley Road/SR 167 to SR 515 new arterial 29. 11�Avenue Southeast-Renton City Limits to South 192nd Street arterial widening 30. 140u'Avenue Southeast-SR-169 to Southeast 192nd Street arterial widening 31. Coal Creek Parkway-Southeast 72°d Street to Renton City Limits arterial widening and realignment Avenue South and on a new connection between Logan Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South. The facility will be carefully integrated with other planned developments in the downtown area. Regional transit service will be provided by the previously described RTA express bus service, as well as by select King County Transit Division (Metro) express bus routes. The local transit system will link neighborhoods and commercial centers with one anotlier as well as to the regiona.l transit system through connections to the Downtown Renton Transit Center. Local service will be provided through a combination of services, including buses, shuttles, and Dial-a-Ride (DAR'1� service. In addition, interceptor park-and-ride lots should be developed close to trip origin locations, with transit service feeding the Transit Center and regional services. An illustration of Renton's 20-year transit plan is provided in figure 2-3. This figure depicts planned regional and local improvements, and identifies at a conceptual level potential service types and transit_ routes. Specific transit service improvements and facilities identified for the ne�ct 6 years, by 2010 (to provide a level of service standard that is concurrent with future land use projections), and beyond the next 20 years to support Renton's conceptual transit plan, are described in the Renton Transit Plan Support Document as well as in the King County Transit Division's Six Year Transit Development Plan for 1996-2001 (December 1995) and by the RTA's Sound Move program. This Transit Plan comprises a transit system that will serve Renton over the next 20 years (1995 to 2015) as a regional destination and as a city with commercial and neighborhood centers. It should also be noted that the exclusive freeway/arterial HOV facilities included in the HOV Chapter are needed to support and encourage increased transit use by improving transit travel times (by enabling buses to bypass or avoid the traffic congestion that is forecasted for the Renton and regional road systems). Page II-47,paragraph 8 is amended to read as follows: The City has identified arterial HOV corridors based on the policies listed in Section 3.1. These corridors include many of the principal arterials through central Renton and state routes throughout the city. The Renton HOV Plan includes the provision (over the ne�rt 20 years, 1995 to 2015) of the HOV facilities shown in Figure 3-1. The Plan includes HOV facilities, in the form of HOV lanes or intersection queue jumps),in the Renton corridors listed below: Page II-49,paragraph 1-3 is amended to read as follows: ' The Renton Arterial HOV Plan has been coordinated with the King County arterial HOV program. The county program identifies SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway), SR 515 ('Talbot Road S.Benson Road), SR-900 (Sunset Boulevard) east and west of Renton city limits, Park Avenue N/NE, Carr Road/S.E. 17� StreetJPetrovitsky Road and N.E. 3r�/N.E. 4� Street as probable HOV comdors. Other HOV corridors that will influence travel within and around Renton include Duvall Avenue N.E. and SR-181 (West Valley Highway/Interurban Avenue). Regarding Duvall Avenue N.E., 140� Avenue S.E. and S.E. 192nd Street,Renton will coordinate with King County on the feasibility of HOV facilities on these arterial corridors. i The HOV Plan also includes two transit corridors (Talbot RoadBurnett Avenue in Central Renton and the S.W. 1� Street extension in the Renton Valley). These facilities are intended to support and encourage use of planned regional transit facilities (i.e., Downtown Renton Transit Center and the Renton/Tukwila commuter rail station). The TalbotlBurnett comdor would be transit-only (except for local access by neighborhood traffic) and is planned to be implemented by 2010. The Valley corridor TxxFnvtu..noci Table 4.2 is amended to read as follows: TABLE 4.2 PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES No. Facili Name Route 3 Sunset Bypass Route Northeast 17— Street (Duvall Avenue Northeast to Union Avenue Northeast) Union Avenue Northeast (Northeast 17� Street to Northeast 12� Street) Northeast 12�Street or NE 10`� Street(Union Avenue Northeast to Edmonds Avenue Northeast) Edmonds Avenue Northeast(Northeast 12th/10�`Street to Northeast Park Drive) Northeast Park Drive (Edmonds Avenue Northeast to Lake Washin on Boulevard North 21 Monroe Avenue Northeast Monroe Avenue Northeast (Northeast 4— Street to Northeast 12— Street 1 Duvall Avenue Northeast Duvall Avenue Northeast (Northeast 10— Street to Northeast 24— Street 30 Lake Washington Boulevard* Lake Washington Boulevard (Northeast 44— Street to Northeast k Washin on Loo Route Park Drive) 42 Garden* Houser Way North(Lake Washington Boulevazd to North 8—Street) k Washin on Loo Route Garden Avenue North orth 6�Street to Bronson Wa 43 Central Renton Connection Garden Avenue/North 6 Street to Airport Perimeter Road (Various k Washin on Loo Route routes under consideration). 34 Buruett Burnett Avenue South Cedar River Trail to Southwest 7�Street) 5 Airport Airport Perimeter Road corridor (i,ogan Avenue Narth to Rainier (Lk Washington Loop Route) Avenue) Rainier Avenue North (Airport Perimeter Road to Northwest 3rd Street) 22 Hardie/Rainier Bypass Northwest 3r(Rainier Avenue North to Hardie Avenue Northwest) Hardie Avenue orthwest 3rd Street to Southwest 7�Street) 7 Southwest 7— Southwest 7—Street urnett to Oakesdale 11 Southwest 16- Lind Avenue Southwest (Southwest 7— Street to Southwest 16— Street) Southwest 16�Street ind Avenue Southwest to Oakesdale Road '� 14 Southeast Area Main Avenue(Bronson Way to Benson Road South) Benson Road South(Main Avenue South to Southeast 168�Street) 8 Puget Drive Southeast (Benson Road South to Edmonds Avenue Southeast) 35 Lake Youngs Waterline (Edmonds Avenue Southeast to Tiffany Park) Edmonds Avenue Southeast (Puget Drive Southeast to South 157� Street * Identified in the proposed 6 Year(1995-2000)Transportation Improvement Programs. Txiv�xaL.noci �I plans, and an environment impact assessment report. Every few years the Airport Master Plan is updated as necessary to reflect progress and changes from the original Master Plan. Airport Master Plan Implementation The airport development and financial plan portions of the Master Plan identify the capital improvements that should be accomplished, specify when ihese improvements should be accomplished, and determine the economic feasibility of accomplishing the programmed improvements and , developments. The schedule of developments and improvements is established in five year increments, to coincide with the 5-, 10-and 20-year projections of the Master Plan. Based upon the 5-year schedule of improvements and developments, Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program Funds are requested for assistance with the accomplishment of those eligible projects programmed in the Master Plan. TRNFINAL.DOC/ ATTACHMENT F GLOSSARY The Glossary is amended as follows. Definitions not listed remain unchanged large scale multi-family: a residential building, or group of buildings which contain more than four dwelling units in each building. • single familv unit: Repeal townhouse: a form of ground-related housing where individual dwelling units are attached along at least one common wall to at least one other dwelling unit. Each dwelling unit occupies space from the ground to the roof. zero lot line development: a siting technique which allows single family houses to be built along one lot line. This helps to presetve private and usable yard space, especially in small-lot areas. Variations include angled "Z-lots," alternate-width lots, "zipper-lots." amends98gfinal Ell�/dff �� 1il�� l� �� !�1 �j�-'�:;''�' �:.'�� '�� _ � � !�/!1 EB �.� � ' �: ° q �� ' ��1� �� ' �i� �,. . �i s ,,... �� , � ��i� ��1�� ;, � �.� _ .�i1 -�„a _ �, . �1;� � �r ,��.�,� � � ia.1 j ' l��j' � �//�� y'� ,��+ u: i ��J►` ,� �,//,s��3s'�y�.,� `�.. � � .a4�'+�5,.�,#• � � �9- �;! ' � - ��f' � ; �.. \I �� f� � �� 1� � �`� 1► _ �� i � �� .�•,► ��... �I!!�l1;� ;-� , � �--m ,. .��:�F�,,,�, ` � � IIII@�. �� , • '��I:L•I'I�I!� _.._ '� �_ � � � � ��:�s�;�E��';°!��!.,-•=� (�� ...� ��r'°°` ��I *,. .,�. ��R'�Ft:��l��4;?�1 i��`i��.,; �IL��I�'�Ca e� ■�'�''z/��E� �. II �[il� � ItIL �,, �, � � i��l-��:�Q;k ��l�;fl��,��,�:�� , efr ��'E ��?:�i�i�� ' \ �'f :r;��*`�r��.-.Trr��<�� - / e ��{��t�7y ��,� �, Q":7c � ��'�� ,;��,:'�af'��o�°�aj '��i'��^'"�"��A��e�� +l�� :w��r� �'��y oo�;� � �n��'��=� ��t R- � - � 1�.��►��i��t► ��Nd�" To�°� k�` °��z�� 1N �S �= � .� �'� �a a�� `� ' j � �� r�' �EEE{' �-��_��_,;�:a""*�; - � TJ��: " !�� ', ��pGl'A�P:,. � ,:gn. �_• �. - � , � `�� ' ��'��r� � �� 'r� 1�11• �,• � ��,� �;i�rt�''„�.n1��p�"� �� a,_�� —� i� �� ,!�� u�c p.�i� a.�' � ��;'a-�:,,a��,�+, ,��,j �'�." , .,r�,'.._:;�:t;r,�Q;*,•�. ;11 �� C,,y . 1 .�; `—• 0} �� 3� . �4P, i r � �� r.. *� `�:'a`kA�� , �"�v�� ct�l. 'll � ' ^'�., ■�i�e� � �� .��/�,�?A��`•5^'�I,i.ti+i�li`�i � r� � �� CI f�`'► �a''��;,e•?%,�:.�+�_ � � �. �� i��z °mb:��: �. ��. ��E.�'�€ t� � i. � �R.'i:n.Ia"''. �� :,y' ��!�� \ l��;;�2.�� NI�E � :L4'�E �� '" - �, ■ 1 � ��'� � ,. �E � �►' �� ,� �� ,e�gi�.� 5'� ..� �; . I� as ,�� `_ �i�e,��!!1� .r�ll�[� ��► .._ � �l�.1 �'*�� :�� .�_ - � � � = � ��.� �.:. ,, �� o��.� � ��,�� ` ;�!, �I ��r�7 ` � , ��:!_.. ;e�, ° � �!- ■L � ;�� ,•s � i��r��':I'��.;��,�� !"�► ��;��s � `�,�,�_ ,� ' . � - �� - ,�� , ��..l�� . �� ;��'��r�� ,�. i;,, ��,�� '�'° ��;�� M l ��'�� " �� .�,� � �'"'�� - � �' , �� "�� \ � � � � ;� �� ; � �� , �� , - _ e �� .�� ' �I�� ,� � � � . , � �� ,� � � . � � — "'"*� �� y_ �� ' ■ -�� _ � , �. �__ �� m � �� ■a 1l�11��l�'�,�1�'�d�_ ��,�� ;. . . � �. . .. ...� � � ��E1i�lA`L��CL��l�E%�� (6p'1�{ � � � • � � � � � '�'ri� � cn;�x, � �� . � � � ��`s9 •.. ,. � . � � . � 1 � 1 1 S 1 1 �,r.. . 1 h.•:•:•Yn`••i2hS >M�..`4.r:`r:TieF?f'v'.i'l.>.ixR C ��