HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF-02-141 2+•
•
•
I , , ,
j • 1 • • I.
II
" Il
" U
" 11
II
" ,.
21
2l
" 1$ ,.
21 ,. ,.
30
1I
II
II
" )j
16
31 ,. ,. ..
" " " " <j
46
"
•
, '
o
1.('111' [HUt Numher II:
• Mr. Nicholson allrges non-compliance with "related provisiol1s requiring
c:uly :md continuous (lublic p"nicip;uion-without referencing the
sections of statule where loose ·,elaled plovisia"s· ,,,ist
Lrgal h~uf Numhu 14:
• Mr. Nicholson IlkgfS violltions ofRCW J6,70A and RCW 41.21C. but
does not idenlify specific Stttions of those statutes that arc Dllcged 10 be
viola:cd.
Legal issues I.), 4. 8, mnd 14 fail 10 stille a claim and should be dismissed with prejudice.
1. Mr. Nicholson ~cntrally IIlIeges thallhc City has nol complied
wllh the GMA or S.:VA, but he (:ails 10 Illtdry a City aellon thai
('.used Ihe .1I~td ,'lol;allon.
The J)o:ud's tcgubllions and Notice ofl Icaring required thaI each of Mr Nicholson's
legal isstJcs identify the specific Cily aClionthal is alleGed to \'iolate the Gr-.,M or SEJ'A.
Notice oO'earing. p. 4.lctQrd WAC 242·02·2 I 0(2Xe) f'l:ever1hclcss, 5C\'cral of Mr.
Nicholson'S issucs fail to specify Any GClion liken by the City on November 24, 2003 as a
Nsis for alleged violaiions onaw, All of the legal issues th3t fail to satisfy the essenti:.1
efement ofidenlifyinS a rC\ljeV.'able City Dction should be: dismissed with prejudice because
they do not sUlIe a daim
1«:111 hSHe Numbf'r 3:
• Mr, Nicholson bro.ldly questions whether the City's comprehensive plan
satisfies cer1ain requirements. but he makes no reference to any specific
action by the City (i e Ii! pilin amendment adopted by the City on
November 24, 2003)
DOEING'S MOTION TO DiSMISS -IJ
fO~ll)."sI..I)07 IU'JI
I'UIUSS COlE UJ'
IWt n.iriJ AYmue, Suhe 4&00
Snule. WadllnAton 98101·J{m
(206) 058)·8888
.. " ,
•
"
...
•
, ' .
--_.,
,
I ,
J ,
5
6
7 • • I.
" " IJ
" IS I.
17
" ,. ,.
" " 2J
" '5
'6
'7
28 ,.
30
31
31
33
'" 35 3.
37
38
3' •• 41
" <3
" 45
<t.
47
,
,
, , .
J,(,fA I h~llt NUlTlhrr 4:
, Mr. Nichoh,on sc:ncrally qucslions wJu:lhc:r Ihe Cily's compreh(lIs.Ye plan
fails to comply wilh GMA consi.tlcncy requirements. but he makes no
reference to any spceific action by the Cily (i c. a pl,ln amendment
adopted by the City on November 24, 2003)
• Mr. Nicholson broadly allcSes Ihal the "City Land usc clement and
rdated dC\'e!opmcnt rcgul;nions· violale SEPA and Ihe GMA, but Ihe
issue d()(s nOI identify any spccific Cil)' actions taken on November 24,
2003 .
, Mr . Nichol50n alleges thai -the City amcndmcnls and regulalions" violllte
GMA gOlds, htJllhc issue docs not specify Dmcndmcnls or regulalions
adopted on No'.ember 24,200)
J.rgnlln uf Numhrr 9:
, Mr. Nicholson qucslions Ihe City's compliance with WA.Shington law
when -the Cit)' purpons 10 plan-under lhe GMA. but the hsue d(kS nOI
identify I reviewable City aclion (i e a City action liken on November
24,2003)
1..a:II ' JUllt Numhrr 10:
, Mr. Nicholson uks -[w]hethcr citizenry should be required lu mitigate
lransponation impacts an ... .,. projtClS are completc'" and alleges thAl -the:
Cily has not adopted or implemented development regulations that would
legally address mitiSRlion nfcuMlulftlivc impacts'" These qUC$lions anti
1l0ElNG'S MOTION TO DISMISS. 14
to,~141 n'l 04/IJIO :tIl
1't:JIJ.:L"S Con: I U'
1201 Third A\'tnuc. Suit.: 01800
Sr1oltle. WWtlntlon 91101·J099
t~1 ~B)·BS3ll
> .' •
" ,
, , ' ..
"
,
" , , ~
"
.' " \. .. , ., ".
,
'.
,
,
I
" ,-
'.
•
,
•
•
•
I
1
) , ,
, • 7 • • • I.
" Il
OJ
" " " • 11
" I.
:zo
21
II
2J
" " " n
" 19
).
]I
Jl
lJ
" -. " ).
J7
J8
) . ...
" " " ..
" ..
"
. ' .
o
allcgations refer to IIctions Ihnt the City could take in the fUlUrc .1 These
questions lind allegations do 1101 stalc a dmim on the basis ofaclions
il.Cluillly taken by the Cil), (i .e. aClions laken on November 24, 2003).
1=n:.1 IItlle" Numtlu I I:
• Mr. Nicholson Isks whether City -development regulations-are non-
complillnt ·without change or amendment,-bullhc issue docs nOI allegc
deficiencies in a sr«ific development reguilltion adopctd or .mended on
November 24,200)
1!1!.IIUlit Numhrr 12:
• Mr. Nicholson asks whether the Cily's ·dcv~lopmenl rcgul:l.lions and
comprehensive planning-fail to be guided by GMA goals, but tlte issue
does nOi allege deficiencies in a sptcific City action (i c. I development
regulation or comprehensive plan provision IldOplcd or amended on
November 24, 2(03).
Ltg.1 hSII£ Numbrr 14:
• Mr. Nicholson asks whether the City's -development regulations and
Comprehensive pl:lnning" violate or fail 10 comply wilh Washington raw.
Ilowtvtt, the issue dots not allege deficiencies in II. specific de\'clopment
regulation or comprehensive pia" provision adopted or amended on
November 24, 200).
t To the cxlcnltlut Mr. Nic.holson secks 3n ;UJViSOfY opinion on I!.ctions !l1"tthe City could
bkc in the future, this issue is nOI ripe for rc\;cw. ncw 36 .70.29O(1} ("'The Board dull! nOC issue
adVISOry opinion:J .... N).
BOEING'S MOT/ONTO DISMISS. IS
IO;.lOHII1~"SUMO"IIO 1Il1!
1't)tIo;I:rriS Con: IJJ'
1201 Thinl AYenU(, Sulle 4800
sallIe, W.uhln&lon 98101·J009
(206) .5J1J-8S!B
•
I
I
3
4 ,
• 1 • • I.
I!
II
13
" " I.
11
II
19
2.
II
II
2l ,.
" " " " 29
30
JI
II
3)
34
n ,.
)7
38
). 4.
41
41
4) ..
" <6
41
,
,.
•
. •
•
. .
•
11'CIl! 'nut NuJt1hcr 16:
• Mr, Nicholson asks Ihe llo:Hd 10 oultr Ihe City to flke a new aClion (0
amend uisling regulations "regarding impact rec mitigation: but he dots
nol sl~le a claim on the basis ora specific reviewable action wen by the
City (i c a City aelion adopting or amending rChtUlations on November
24,2003) ,
1&'29111111£ Nllmbrr IK:
• Mr . Nicholson claims Ihallhc City'S "'dcvdopmcnt fCl,>ulalions· must be
revised, but he does not Illege a violation or Icgal requirement based on a
specific City letion (i c, an action taken by the City on November 24,
2003)
1.('~1!1 hUlr Number 19:
• Mr. Nicholson llisks whClhr:r the City's exist ing CCllnprchcnsivc pl.1n
should be amended 10 require "'best I\'ailablc science: but the iuue does
1101 state. claim on Ihe balis of. spedrie action by the City (i e. An
action by the City on November 24,2003»)
'.real IUlle Numllrr 10:
• Mr. Nicholson alkses violations orlaw b:lstd on storm\1 .... 1tr rrg,uSalions
that wtrc not amended I1S p:ut of the City'S action on NO\"1:mber 24, 'lOCH
1 To the atOll 111011 Mr. Nicholson n'(b ~n ad\ ISOI)' OI"nlon on :tctlOl\S tlul the City could
take in the fUMe,lhis Issue is not ripe (Of fC\1CW RCW 36 70.l9O(1) {"l'hc Do.1rd sh311 not issue
"d"isory opinions . . :}.
J Irl.
l"F.k"I~S COli: lJJ"
1l0EING'S MOTION TO 1)ISMISS • 16
10 K'(I)4tl~"11H01111l'f.11
1201 Third A\1..11)C'. Suite 4800
$callie. Washill£tllll 9dI0l·)099
(206) S8J.ass!
, •
'" •
• "
• •
,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,
•
I
2
l , ,
6
1 • • I"
\I
11
\l
" " I" n
\I
" 2Q
1I
22
13
" 15
26
n
21
29
JO
11
12
II
].I
" 16
31
lS
1. ..
,I
" .1 ...
" ." 41
legal i~suts3. 4, 6, 7, 9,10, II, 12, 14, 16. 18, \9, nnd 10 fmillo statcnc:lilim and should be
dismissed with prejudi<.:c.
3. Mr. Nicholson aUtiu vlolallollS or the GMA or St:PA that (Ilnnol
be viahalcd by Cit)' action.
Several arMr. Nicholson's issues Irc based on sections orlhe GMA or SEPA that describe
legislalh'c lindings or prescribe standards for review by this Oonrd . Iswes such as these do
nOl Male a claim based on requirements or duties Ihat apply to the City. Under these issues
and ,llItutes, thefe arc: no facts that Mr. Nicholson could allege and pro\'c that would sustain
• claim aglinst the City. The following legal isw cs should be dismissed because they
cannot possibly slate II claim against the City :
l.u:Alluu£ Numhf'f 1:
• Mr . Nicholson stiues his i!suc by rcl~tence to RCW 36.70A.3oo and
lleW 36.70A .302, whiCh describe the 8ol\rJ's authority Dnd diKrction in
resolving appeals Dnd providing remedies. It is not possible for the City
10 viol:uc these pruvisions of the GMA before the Board has even
completed review Ind relched I decision.
• Mr. Nicholson cites to RCW 36.70A.130(b), which docs not exist and
lherefore cannot be violated by the City.
• Mr. Nicholson references ReW 43 .2IC.OJO(I)(2)(5), which is essentially
a pramble to SEPA's staMory provisions requiring specific decision-
making proctdufcs It is impossible for the City to violl!e these
flrovi~ions ofSE1'A without alleged ,,;olltions of the specilic decision-
making requirements thl\l follow in RCW 43 .2IC.030{'2)(b)·{h) and other
pro\'isions o(SE('A.
BOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS· 17
t03OO).G1711SIJM01I0."'1
,
•
• • •
,
•
1'r_'lKI:"fS COlE Ul'
1201 Third ""muc. Sullc<4800
Sn\llc. Wuhlnllon 98101 ·1009
(106) ~81·88S8
I
2
3 • , ,
7 • • I.
" 12
13 ..
" 16
17
II
I. 2.
21
22
23
" " 26
27
" 29 3.
31
32
33
" " 36
31
31
39 •• .. ., ., ..
" " "
, ,
o
I&C!' IUllf Nllmbrr ~:
• Mr. Nicholson allc!lcs lhallhe Cily has "ioilled Ihe consistency
requirement orthe GMA because the Cily's amendment of its
Comprchcnsi\'c Plan is inconsistent with the meaning oflhe
Comprehensive ph'" before il ..... as amended This Allcgalion require! an
inlcllJretation oCthe GMA Iha' bans any AJ'I"coomcnt of comprehensive
plans because :In amendment is. pt'r :Ie, inconsi,,(cnl with the I«tion of
the comprehensive plan Ihlll it amends, ~·lr. Nicholson cannot possible
Siaic a claim thai I comprchcrui\'c pI In amendment is as ",'r M \'iolltion
oflhc ot .. fA', consistency requirements.
'-sul 'nur Humbrr 6:
,
• Mr. NichollOn al":gts a claim under RCW )6.70A 320 I. which is the
st:md.rd of rcv;cw thallpplicJ to the Doard. It would be impouible for
Mr. Nicholson 10 allege and prove faets showing that the Cit y violated the
standard ofrc:view that is lI(1plicd by the Iloard .
• Mr. Nicholson alleges -,he City land usc: element and development
regulations· violate: RCW 43 21C.020 lind RCW 43 .2IC.O)O. but these
SElIA provisions 8o\'em the: City's decision. milking procedures. RCW
43 .21C ,020 and RCW -I32\C 030 do not providc WbSlan!i\'c standards
"or comprehcnsi\'e: pl'MinE and land usc rcgulalion . It is impossible for
the substance ofille Cit)"s comprehensive plan and development
regulations 10 ... iolale decision·making procedur~ under SEPA .
DOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS. 18
to)(lOJ41lVS lD4(I' 10.l91 J
I'IJUW"S COlt u.r
1201 Third A\~. Suile: 4S(1O
Xlnlc:. Wuhlnlton 9&101·3009
(WIS, 58]·11188
•
•
•
•
I
2
l • ,
• 1 • • I.
" 12
IJ ..
" 16
11
" " 20
21
22
lJ ,.
" 2.
21
" 29
30
]I
J2
lJ ,.
j, ,.
31
" J.
40
41
42
" ..
" •• <1
o
I·rlft' IUlJr Numhrr ~:
• Mr. Nicholson alleges ,,';ololion of the proccduQI requirements ofllCW
43 .21C,020( I Xc), which does not colllaio procedu/'31 requirements thai
tan be violated by any aClion orlhe City.
'sU" h'!It Number 9:
• Mr. NicholKln alleges. claim under RCW 36.70A.IJO(b), which docs
1101 e;(i~ and tannOI be ... inltttcd by the City.
11"1t1 luut Numhrr II:
• Mr. Nichol!:on alleges Ihlllhc City's development rcgub,lions arc non.
compliant with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A.070, bUllhal section of
the OMA applies to comprehensive plans, nol devclopmcni regulations,
Therefore there is no SCI ufraclJ thaI Mr. Nicholson could prove to
)upport his claim.
In.' 1"lIe Numher 17:
• Mr. Nicholson ciles 10 RCW 36.70'\.172, which applies ..... hen a
jurisdiction amends its critical ateA ordinanecs. In this aue, the City did
not #mend ils criucal irQ ordinances
',uet Inue Numhu 19:
•
•
Mr. Nicholson ciles fo RCW J6,70A. I 72, which applies when a
jurisdidion amends irs critical area OIdinanccl. In tms case, the City did
not amend its crilialaru ordinances
Mr. Nicholson nlso alleges II violation orlhc: requirements or RCW
J6,70A IJO{b). which docs not e:cist and cannot be violaled by the City.
BOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS. 19
JOlOQUl'''''1LOW1I0·l'JJI
I'ulKI!'tS COlt U.P
1201 Thlrd",,,t'tlue,Suhe4SOO
x;tlllt', Wnblnalon 98101.)099
UOti) !!8)·A8M
,
I
2
1
4
S • 7
I • 10
" " 11
" IS I.
17
II
19
20
" " 2' " ,.
2.
21
18 ,.
3D
JI
" 3l
" " J6
17
'I
30
.. 0
41
" 4l ...
4S 4.
47
o
'.rgellflur NlIJIlhrr 11 :
• Pet itioner aileKes \'iolalion of RCW 41 21 C.020, which sets (orth
legislati\'c findings and policics 11 is impossible to prove thaI the City
acted in violalion oflhis section ofSEPA without alleging and proving
violations of morc spa:ific requiremenu orSEI' A
Legal issues I. 5, 6, 8, 9,11.17,19, and 21 fail to stale. claim and should be: dismissed
with prejudice.
... Mr. Nichohon don nol .Urge raels necesSIty 10 esl.blilh the
basic tle-mtn,s of .Urged Grt~A ,'Iot"tions.
,
For several js!Oucs, Mr. Nicholson raib 10 mllegc facts that arc ~scnliallo suppon
aUcgerl violations orthe GMA TIlis is particub,rly the case for Mr. Nicholson's iuues
allcging failure to be guided by the pltinning goals ortlle GMA . Under RCW 36.101\ 020,
the City'S comprcher-,.sivc planning and development legulati.:lns arc guided by 13 goals.
The goals should be considClcd by tbe City, bul the statutory goals do not require. spccinc
outcome in City decision makins
To Slale a cla im under RCW 36 70 020, Mr, Nicholson must allege that the City
failed to even consider I relevant goal or look action that directly conflicts wilh a planning
80al. Sec. c g., Manke l.umbt'r CQ...Jnc \' CC.DJnl1.f1l~t So und GrO\\11:lMIO;gemenl
)Ieuings HOard, 11 J Wn.App 6 t 5, 627.28, 53 I' 3d 10 II (2 002); !iutKbmidt '" Cjtyof
Mf~~ltnd. CPSGM1ID, Case No 92·3 ·000c. (1993) Mr. Nicholson's iss u!) do not
a\lcgc that the City failed 10 consido!r plamli ng goals Rather. Mr. Nicholson'i iuues
acknowledge thal1he City con~idetcd GMA planning goals before lakingllctioll wilh which
Mr. Nicholson simply disagrees Mr. Nichohon's objectio n 10 Ihe City'S balancing of the
GMA 801\1s docs not 5Iate II chl,im for \'iol"'lioo orlbc OMA The Board should dismiss for
BOEING'S MOTION TO OISMISS ' 20
to)l)01417""~Cll l/) l'JII
--, --:--,~-",----,-. --
, ,
• ,
" V" :-, "
I'IJtKIS5 COtE I !"
120t Third "nn~. ~utlt' "sao
Sc~lIlt'. Wuhlnl lon 91101 ,]099
12(6) SI).!881
••
, .
,
,
" "
"
,
,
,
I ,
3 ,
S • ,
• • I. , II
" Il
" IS ,.
17 ..
I' ,.
" " 2l
24
2l ,.
" ,. ,.
30
31
" l)
" 3l
l6
31
3'
3' ..
" " 4l .
'" " .. .,
.,
o
failure to state a cllim those issues thai allege a fililurc 10 be "guidL-d-by p ~ann i llg FOR Is,
without II more spec:ilic allegation Itklllhc City failed to c~n consider a G~ft\ goal or Dcted
in direct contraVt':uion .,f. goal Issues thai f.ilto Siale II c!.Jim arc:
"Uftl h.ur NU"lhrr 1:
• Petitioner alleges failUic 10 be: suided by the ccnain planning g~lllistoo
in RCW J6.70A.020, but docs not aUege. failure 10 consider su~h
planning goals lind docs not allege " violation of the g031s .
InllllU\lt Num'iirr 7:
• l'clilioncr alleges Ih.,t the eil), fa ih:d to be guided by the plnnnins goals
ofRCW 36:10;\ 020(5),(10), and (II) bcC3use the City defended the
adequacy orits ms against Mr. Nicholson's :\ppeal or the CI S to the City
Hearing Examiner.
J..tl!lIl blllr Numhpr 3:
• Pctitionc i alleges that the City railed tD be 811jd~ by the planning goals
ofRCW 36.701\.020(10) and (II) becau.se the City defended the
adeqtllCY orits ElS against Mr. Nicholson's appeal orthe CIS 10 the City
Hearing Examiner.
1931 Inus Nllmhrr 9:
• 1'~I;lioner alleges rllilule to be guided by planninG goal 12 orRCW
36 10A.020(12) 1;(Qu se th-.: City hAs not ),ctlaken an acti on that could be
gu ided by OM,\ go;u 12.
BOEINGS MOTION TO D1S~IlSS ' 21
(OlOtI)..O\ "'lu.cn ,0 :n'1
, , . ,
PrJtIW~S COlE UI'
120llbild A\'n\ue. SU il! "800
Saul{', W,'lhlnglon 9BIOI ·J(199
(206) 58)·8838
.,
"L ~. .
.'
I
2
J , , ,
7 • , I.
" " Il
" " 16
17
" " '" 21
12
2J
" " 26
27
18 ,. J.
JI
Jl
JJ
'" JJ
36
J7
" )' •• " " " ..
" .,
"
.'
,
• •
" -'
J.tglilinur Numhrr 12:
"
, ,
,
, • ,
• Petilioner allcges failure 10 be guided :,y planning go,,112 ofRCW
3610A 020(12) beause the: Cily hn not yet taken an aClion thaI could be
guided by GM,' goal 12
'd'gJlllnur Numhl'r 13:
• Pelitioner aI/ega failure to be guided by cmain planning 8oa)s of RCW
36 70A.020. bUI he dOCl 001all('8c (h"lthe City failed to consider those
goall
I.rCJlllulIS' Sumh:-[ 10:
• Mr Nicholson allcgts failure: to be guided by planning 8001110 of RCW
36 .70A.020( I 0) because Iht Cil)' has nUl )'ct taken an aclion Iha( could be
guided by GMA Hoal 10.
14gB' hsur NUlJlhrr 21:
• Mr . Nicholson alleees failufe 10 be guided by pll1nninS8oals 10 and 11 of
RCW 36.70A 020(10) and (II) hecause the City did n01 follow the
wishes expressed in Mr. Nichulson's commcnis.
Issues 2,7, 8, 9, 12. 13,20, Gnd 21 fail 10 slatc a c.l3.im under Ihe GMA'. goal sand should be
dismissed with prejudice
U. luucll,J,6.8.9,IO,II,!l,I", 16,II,I9,andli R.lscO:alms Under
SEl'A 1'h., Arc Not IUpc (or Rn'ic""
Although the Board has jurisdicliCln o\"l~r claims Ilrising under SEI'A. SEPA ;11$0
requires C)(hmU5lion oradminisU'ali\'c apl'Cills berore thc City . RCW 43 2IC.015(4); WAC
191·11·680(3Xc), CLEAN Y. Ci!)'9rSpohnc, IlJ Wn 2d 4SS, 464.65, 947 Jl2d 1169
(1997). Mr. Nichoh:on'j IIFR., the Boar d's NOIice or, Icaring. and the Doard's Prchellring
DOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS. 22
IU}OOl.41 11 "IM0110 "'1
'. , ,
-
,
, '
1't:.tKISS Con:. UI
I~I TIlltli An~nur. SU!lC 4800
St:'Ulc, Wlbhin~:an 98101.)1199
(~) ~&J.!IS8
I'
,
, " .. !:
,
•
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
•
•
, ,
] ,
5 • ,
• 9 ,.
" " IJ
" '5 ,.
n ,. ,. ,.
11
" " " " ,.
" ,.
19
~J
]I
Jl
• })
].I
" J.
17
l8
]'J
'" " " " " " 4.
"
L
, ,
• ,
,
" ,
o
Order alllltimowledge Ihal Mr. Nicholson hit! nut p:t c:xhllustcd his SEPA arpeal before the
Cit)' The Oord hlS assured Mr Nicholson thot he ".,ill be provided the opportunity to
allege SEllA claims after the City h:l.S !llken finaillclion on his pending SErA appeal.
Prcill:,uing Order p.3. Until then, Mr. Nicholson's issues arising under SEPA orc not ripe for
review and should be dismissed without prejudice. Ifnot dismissed with prejudice for
reasons set forth above. the following issues arising unde r SEI}A should be dismissed :
J.rg:.llnllt Nnmhrr 1:
• Allcging violalion of RCW ·1] 21 C.O]O( I X2)(a)
l&1!sl hS:lr Numhrr J:
• Alleging viulation of RCW ·1) 2Ie.OlO.
• Alleging \'iollulon o[RCW 43 21e.020 and RCW 4),2IC.OJO.
"telll bnu' Numhrr II;
• Alleging violation orltCW 43 ZIC 020{lXc)
l.fJ:pllUlit Numhrr 9:
• Alleging violation orRCW ·13.2IC 0]0
l.n::d Inllt Numflrr 10:
• Questioning the adequacy orthe CIS and mitigation of cumulative
impacts.
l.n:allUllt Numbrr II:
• Alleging violation ofRe\\' 41 .2IC.020{IXc).
• Alleging violation orRCW 4] 21e 0)0,
l'llKL"iS COlt: u.r
nOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS -23
IO~ln '11~la 19JI
1201 Third Avenue, Suilr 4800
Sealilc. Washln,ton 98101 ·)099
(l{I6) "UUSS
"
•
• -'.
" -
•
1 ,
l • ,
• 7 • 9
10
" " Il
" " " 17
" I. ,.
" " II
14
II ,.
21
" ,.
3.
31
3l
3l ,..
3l
3.
31
31
39 4.
" .,
4l
" 4' ..
"
•
•
o
J,t'ul (stilt Ntllllhrr '4:
• Alleging violation of RC\Y 4].21 C.
1.(2"1 lUllS' Numhl"[ '6:
• Alleging violation of RCW 4) 21e 0)0
1.tCa! jUlIe Nllmhrr II:
• Alleging violalion of RCW 43 lie 0)0
).s°U! IUtlt Numhrr 19:
• ""c~ing violation ofRCW 4) 21e 020(2)
J&,ulluut Nllmhrrll:
o
• Alleging violation ofRCW 41 .21C 020(1)(.){b)(c).
All claims arising under SI!PA should be dismissed without prejudice
.. ~. nu~: Durd Should Rrquirc A Morc nrfinitr Sialtmtni of Any
Hemalnlng JUUts.
WAC 242·02.260(2) and Cft 12(c) provide thllthe Ooard ma~' gran! a motion 10
provide a more definite stalement ir. pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot
rClson:ably be rcquill .. -d to frlline a rcsronsi\'c pleading, or if more particularity in (hat
rh:.lding will funhcr the efficien! and economical disposition orlhc action
For the rCiUOns described in Ihis mot ion, the »oard's effective: lind efficient revic:w in
this Dppeal will he frustrated u nles~ Mr Nicholson satisfies his burden 10 concisely define
the issues for rcview. Should the lJoud decide DgDinSl dismisS3t of all oflhe issues in this
appeal, the Doud should order Mr. Nichol!tOn 10 cleafly restate an)' tCnlDinir.g issucs in
conjunction with a molion 10 amend the I'FR
lJOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS. 24
IO}OO)4Il.l/llI.MQ1'IO :ttll
-.
"
,.
, .'
,
"
, ,
.,
..
•
I'uuass COIF. 1.11
1201 ThIrlJ An:nut. Suitt "800
Stank. Wn!tin.,ton 98101 ·ID)9
(106) S8J.J!S8
'.
, ,
. ,
,
, ,
,
,
i
,
•
•
I , -) ,
• o ,
• 9
10
II
12
\J
14 I' 10
I' I' I'
20
21
12
lJ ,.
l>
76
11
" " )0
)1
" II ,..
l>
)6
11
)8
" ..
41
'2
')
" ..
46
"
I 7
VI. COSC1.USION AND PROI'OSJo.:O OH.DER
For the ftsSOlb ~ f=!1h ;Wo\'e, DOting lespectfully requests that all orMr.
Nichol~'s issues be di~1'1issed with prejl,j;!ire, For any surviving issues, claims under
SEPA 5hould be dismis~ without prejudice Finally. ror any remaining issues, Mr.
Nicholson should be required 10 pro"';de a more definite slatement or each issue. A
propo~ order is submitted "ith the Presiding Officer's wolking copy oflhis molion.
RESPECTFUI.LY SUDMIITED Ihi, I 51h d,y orM.u:h. 2()().\.
BOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS -25
p)OO).(ll "."UW)1gO :HI),
• . ,
• • ,
IE UP
By -.f:.o~~"""y'(),-:.J ;;:;;-;-=-;;-;;---
lal G. Schuler, WSDA ,lt25158
Tia Urotherton Ileim. WSDA ,It] 1802
AHOrne)'S for The Dodng Comp~ny
,
rt;A)CLOriS COli: UI
1201 Thin! A\'ctlut, Sui7e 4800
Sallie, W:uhint1on 91101.lOO9
(206) !!S)·ISBB
,
-
I
2
J • ,
6
7 • • I.
" 12
II
14
" 16
17
" I.
2.
" 2l
23
14
" 26
27
" 2. ,.
JI
32
n
34
" 36
37
3.
3.
4.
" " 43
" " ..
41
o o •
t:XIIIIII1' A
SIIr.IM.\ny 0,. '~"Uf:s t\NO GROtl1'lOS Fun PlSMI~<j"I .
hwc lack of Dlrrtd .'.lIure .'.lIuR! .'.UUrt .',lIun: Total S[PA
Subj«1 0, 10 Se.lt 10,Se.le 10 Stile 10 Slltt Rtnon. t1.haull;
Miller SI.hale Cl.lm <.'1.11" a.lm a"hll Dlunlu Dilnllu
JunL or Urnll. OUC'd 1111 DUN on Th .. Dutdon w/P",j. "'fo rfTj.
SCIlult ell, AIIIII/n. Alkj:td
Afllun 10 Cltv rlrll
I Durnin Dismiu Uilmiu 3 Dismin
, Oi.milS I _.
3 Ulsnliu Oismiu Dismin
, Di.miu Dilmin
5
6 Dismiss
1 Dilnli"
8 Dilmin
• Oilmi" Pi.mill
I.
" I)i'mih Oi.min
nOElNG·S MOTION TO DISMISS. 26
IO)()O).Q11)111.04(l110 "11
Oi.min
Dismin
I)ilmlu
Dismiu
nismiu
Oismiu
Ilismiu
Dismin
l>iJnliu
Dilnliu
Uismiu
Oi.miu
• nisml"
3
I
J Dismiu
Dismiss J
Dismiss 3 Dilmiu
Di,mi .. 5 Dunlin
I Dismiss
, msmiu
1'l:M"I~s COIr. UI'
IlUl Third Avenue, Sui~ 4800
Scaule. W"bin£lon 98101 ·)009
(206) 3SJ ·8!S&
:~ ___ '_"~~.'&l _______ ., __ ~.~ .. '.
. I' •
• •
,
•
. , ,
• T
•
• I
,
,
,
,
I
J , ,
• 7 • • 10
\I
12
t3
I.
" " 17
" " 20
21
12
lJ
" lS ,.
11
1B
" ){)
31
31
33
34
JS
36
37
3S
19 ..
4\
" " ..
" <6
41
-
0
.
b_ Lack of lIund .-.Uurr:
Su.bj«1 ", 10 Slate
Mauer 51alule Claim
J.m. of Umlll B.~doa
51,llIle
11 Dilmiu Dumlu
Il
" Disnliu Oismin
IS Dilmiu
16 Oismin
17 Oi.nli»
IS Oi,min Dismiss
I. Dismin
2. Dismiu
l\
.
BOEING'S MOTION TO DISMISS -27
1~)(Ifl141l~'IO "'I
"
•
,
"
.. •
n ~
Failure Failure Failure TOllt SErA
laStale to Stale 10 St.le HulOns [,haUl!;
ClaIm CI.1Ilnl Claim Dhml .. DtJmlu
Uutd on Tho! 8.~dQn w/11rt'J, '( .. /0 Prt'J.
Oly Applin Allra:rd
Mlion 10 el •• · .'arla
Dis min J)ilmiu • Dismiss
nismiu I
Dismiu J Dismiu
I
Durnin 1 Dilmlu
Dismiss 1
Oilmiu J Dismiss
Dumiu Dj,miu J Oisnlin
Oismi .. Oi,miu l
Oilll1in Oumlu 2 Dllmiu
,
I'OIKI~S Con: IJI'
1201 nlinJ Avmlle. Suue 4f1OO
Sc:llllk, W .. ..ttlnGuM1 98101 ·)(1)9
11(6) 5!l-81188 , .
-.
I •
•
r, .'; . '
,.
. '
, , ,
,
L
,
I , ,
4 ,
• 7
8
9
I.
" " IJ
14
" I •
n
18
" '" " " " l4
" ,.
" 18
" ,.
JI
32
" 34
" ,.
J7
" ,. 4.
41
" 4l
<4
" <6
"
. .
,
"
, .' -: -II
A'·
. ,
' .. '" • •
• .. . . ,
. '
,
• . ' • . . . -• .... ~" ...... I,_ ..... ' .... tl:l .... II.' __ ~_ • .::._ .... ~-';~
CI:llTII'IC,\ 1'£ (lI' SF:IIVICI:
On Marth 15,2004, J cnused I() be sen'cd UllOl1 counsel ofrecord.llllhc:addteu:
slaled below. via the method of sct\'ice indic<llcd. I true nnd correct copy of the following
docu.mcnts : Motion 10 Dismiss, "roposed Order.
Mr Orad Nicholson
2)00 l\'U 28'" Sllcel
Renton, \VA 98056
Mr. Larry Warren
Cil)' AIIOfncy
1'.0 . Box 626
Renton, WA 98057
--
-x ,
--X
Vi .. h;lfId delivery
Vi;t U S Mail, 1st Class. I'ostant' "repaid
Vi. Overnight Delivery
ViII Facsimile
Via t:mail
VIIl hind delivery
Vii U SMail, ht Class, ('ouagt Prepaid
Vi" O"crnight Uc!i"C'r)'
Via FAC5imilc
V'1l Email
I certify under pcnllh)' of perjury under the laws of tilt Sialc of Washington and the
Uniled SIllIes lhallhe forcgoing is lrue nnd co(rcCl
•
DATED til Sc:mle, Washinglon. Ih is 1 Slh dA)' M7)..200"'t:::.~ __ _
BOEING'S MOTION TO DI~~USS • 2M
10)001-0 IU"5I.o*0710 ,....JI
,
,
.' ,
" ,
"
Ga.len I Schiller. WSt ,\1125158
,\!lomeys fol' Ihe BOOng Compan)'
rt"rklns Coi~ UP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seallie. WA 98101·)099
Tdcllhone 206·3.S9·8442
Fox " 206.)59·9442
E-mail ssc:huler@pctkirucuie.com
I'tXKIXS ("Oil; IU
..
.'
J 201 ThmJ AMI1UC-. 5uue 41IDO
~1I1t. W&.\hinJlot\ 93101 -lO99
11(6) 5&,\-1138
. , .
•
• ,
. ..
•
•
•
~ •
•
,
.~
•
.,
• , , "
,-
-
•
•
I ,
1 ,
> • 1 • • I.
II
" 11
" IS
I.
n
II
I.
M
" " " " 2S
26
21
" 2'
1IJ
JI
Jl
Jl
).l
3S
36
J1
" " .. .. . ,
4l
" " .. .,
•
,"
" .
•
..
,
•
..
"
o
PRESIDING OFFICER DRUCE C, LAING
1I~.Ilrins Dale ' June J, 2004
llearing Time: 10 .00 .I1.m.
CENTRAl. PUGET SOUND
GROWTH ~t.\NAGEMENT I IEAR[:<GS BOARD
STATE OF WASIIiNGTON
ORAD NICIIOLSON.
Pet itioner.
y ,
CITY OF REto.'TON,
Rcspondcnl .
And
TIlE BOEJNG COMPANY,
Respondent·' nlcrvcnor .
NO, 0<1-J-1JOO.1
ORDER GRANTING DOEING'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
(PROPOSED)
'fhe Ctnlral Puget Sound GfO\\1h r-.bnngcment IlclUings U03rd, having considefl.-d
the motion 10 dismiS$ ofintervCflor ·rcspondcnt,lhe Boeing Compan)' ("Docinl(). the l'clililm
(or Review initialing this mOiller, the PClilioner's Uoard Requested Rem.lemenl of Issues filed
ORDER GRANTING DEFf!NIMNrS
MOTION TO DIS~'IISS • t
IQ)(IO )"oIlj1!II04(J1U lt l1'Il
. '
, . '
" -,
" ..
.' .' ..
•
,~ . . -,
, I
•
,
"
1"t:Mli.I~S COIF. 1.11'
1101 TI.inl ",'cnuc, Sulce 4800
~t1lc. WMhington 98101 ·)(}?9
(206) 58'3 ·8888
:i
--
"
•
, . ,
I
2
J • ,
• 7 • • I.
" 12
Il ..
" " 17 I.
I.
2.
21
21
2l ,.
" ,.
27
2. 2.
JO
" 31
3J
" " 3.
31
" 3 • •• 41
.2
4J ..
" •• .,
•
in this nuncr on fcbm:lfY 17, 2004 ef{e~taICmetll of JsIUC5~)! the plpCrs filed in support Clr
and in opposition to Ooeing's motion, lind aU olhe( papers med in this nailer, now, therefore.
it is hereby
ORDERED thnl noeillS's mOII'111 to dismiss be is hereby GRANTED, .nd it is further
ORDERED thai each oftlie issues lis ted in I'Clilioncr's Restalement ofJssucs ilnd the
UOird's Prc·llwillg Order be: dismjssed as follows
1\ Issues I, 1, 9, 11. 12, and 18 ale dumisscd wilh prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction
n. IssucsJ,4,6,7,9, 11.12,14, 15,16,1', 18.19.ilnd20afcdismis~wilh
prejudice bCCDUSC they assen claims that arc b,med by the stalule oflimillliions.
C. Issues 1,2,1,4,5,CJ, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, 1!i,16,17.18,19,20.:tnd
21 arc dismissed wilh prejudice for fuilure (0 s(lle It claim
D. All issues arising under Ihe Stille Environmcnlall'olicy Act arc dismissed
without Ilrcjudicc
DATED Ihis ____ d:ty of • ___ ~. 2004 .
rr~nted by :
Dy: G:!-."~'n'-G:::.-:. chuler. WSDA 112S 158
Tla llrolherton l lcim. WSUA #]11102
Attomeys for The Doting COIll Jl lny
I'residing Officer
I't.luass CUll: 1.11
-
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANrS
MOTION TO DISMISS - 2
~)(ICI ~ll'IJlIOW.70 DII
1201 TIl II\! A\'C1lUC, Suite 4800
Sanle:, Wa.dlln,wn 98101 ·)099
(206) 58]·5!!88
, -<'
••
•
•
•
• ,
'"
" ..
""
" '" •
"
"' ' ,.,
1
•
l
•
• ,
• ,
10
11
II
13
"
,.
"
•
• o
•
BBFUU TH& C:!NT1l1.L PDOET SOUND
oaat."TH NAHAG!XENT HLUINOS BOARD
IN AND rOR THE STAT! or WASHINGTON
In c..he Ntte.r ccncllmlng puzportrd
cocprehen.ivlI plAnning, deveJopment
r~l .. t10l1 •• and ZOOln!l cnactJDent.
and ~~~t. ot the City ot
Rentonl
are4 Kiebel.OIl. • dtizon ot tiler
City of Rentor.:
Petitioner,
v.
city o f lentoll. , State ot
"'·as:!lir.gtot'l Hunlcip.11 corporadonl
Re"ponder:lt,
Tbe Boeing Co.paay. owning and
oP"U' .. tiD!l II C'O/IZIIerd .. l .11 rplane
~nu! .. cturing pl.nt on land zoned
zndustrhl He .. ",' in the-City ot
RentO;':
Intervener .
~r . Bruce LIIing, prenlding Detieer
Mr. Ed .... llrd O. tleGuit'c. B04Ird Hen:ber
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
•
PETITIONER'S RESPONSE an4
aRIE' TO DISPOSITIVE HOTIOtlS
FOR DISMISSAL
••• d mchohcon
31001l.C.21·St.
'.n~on. w •. "OJ~
-~~-...... ----
•
•
o
1 COKII HOW, the Pfltltloncr. Bud lIichohon according tD the ac:hcdulc for
• for want of rulUlhnent or the PUrpoIlC" and obJective., Conmoll 90.: .... alld
5 .peciUc dircctivea of the La'". of tile Dt_te of Waahlngton and ita Orowth
, ManagtllQent Act COHA) Cthe actll
, And hereby doe •. pre.ent thia rC'ponle and brief upon the record and untu
e partie. belore thia Uoard according to cat.bltched Gchcdulcl ,
10 rNTRCDOerJOK
11 It t.he City Dr Proponrnt had given notice or leave for Petltlonc~ or
12 Citizen. to have knowledge of the actual .mend~ntD that ~erc to be adopted,
1) the 1 •• uea ~y have been aimplcr tor the public and the Board to cOftPrchcnd .
J4 lIowhcTc 1n the BIS performed, the ordinancea adopted, or tor that ~ttcr
15 _nyothere In the record that had been created before tho City in thele
16 proe •• ding., h~. it boon mentioned th~t the comprehensive Pl~n h~d been
11 ~mended to inclUde langu~ge th~t would dhc;Quqge the oper-lItlp" or
18 if}dunrial and m1nufacturlng (cO!!lDC[cial aiu;raft m&m!hc:turin<l ) liGen e" ! be
1, .~bjeet propertx. Th~t C~reh~nlive Pl~nnlng and development regulltion J.
20 now ~t t •• uo, that i. prcci.ely what they have done . Tho ~bov~ i. ex~etly
21 what haa now happenee'.' Why did the City or Proponent not In._r or Itate in
22 ~ reply rhAt they would change the incon.hteney? It ill clear that tbe
2] ~n.wor to that que_tion Je bcc~u.e they had not yet decided to do 10. And
"
" I nee conflicting and inrnn.htent exhlbiu located fit ~>.hlb1t !I .t'
~tJtJoner ReDponse brJef • 2
; ,
'. -• •
. . , ,
.r.d HJelI01IClrl noCl fl.C.U·Sc . •• "U')". "... 'USf
•
. .
•
•
•
•
..
.'
"
. "
1
1
J
"
"
" o ,
." .
, ,
., ..
"
, ,
,
"
bocauae choy now .ubat,ntlally And unlawfully intend to exclude
bAnufacturing and indultr!.l production tr~ eneour.gem~nt,
ethat action that WI. rocommended or articulated nowhere in the
,
"
"
• proceedings), b.c~. more clear •• ~ter ••• Jng tho r •• clution. adopted And
5 the CPP adcptod ngardlng econOlllic dllve1oprrlent. we can 1111 be quit ...
, lurpri •• d At the choice, and that include. thu Board,' Not until aftor the
1 drAfting ot the PFR and the inithl huring. did Petitioner receive.
. ,
I =-i1ing and notice of the .~nd~nt to tho Bcono.ic develo~nt eleMentl. 1
, aUlpeeted that was thdr intent. but nover knew that it 1oO'OUid be l~lement.d
10 in that IUnner, tblt ii, without pdor notice. and blatantly contury to the
11 CPl'.
1) What~. no* occurred I, that in an ~~te~t to reconcile internal local
1) conal.tency :equirementl, the City h.1 now adopt~d langur ge diDcouraging the
~nuf.eturin9 and induDtry on the aite. TheDe actiona and planD create and
15 preDent the ~rd with 4 material and (actual trilemm4, with inability to
16 place the rezone in A pODition that can be harmoni%ed with the aubatantial
11 interena of the pubhc, the CPP, or goat. of the mtA . I c ontended that the
l' conalatency requirementa extend and apply to Local, Regional, and State
l' goda. Had the . Proponent and Statt thODeD to del:llOnatrate that the public
10 intnreat would be aerved by tbe propeDal, And had properly diaeu.aed the
procedure and probable _dver.e economic .n~ Dociol impAct a that wou l d occur
22 .. _ Ullult of the direct ir::pact of the propoill according to Ers
21 requirelllento, the Duboe_neive relul!:: might have been dlUerent, but they
24 hive not, and inat~Ad ouat now litigate upon uneontroverted tactD, and while
J lYidtnce In exhibit 5 ,111 ia to the cantrary
-,
"
"
" "
IIr.d Hs.:-nol.on
.flOO II,C . .f,':a,
•• nt~, w., "05'
•
. \ .
•
. .'
1
1 IItntegy lOQuld appear, iltll'pechlly In the Ught of tho pf"uent need tor
.. quality fllr.ployw.ent to GUlleai" th' hi!]h quality of life that .11 clt.i:en.
5 h.". II right to puraue. They havo not be~n able 1,.0 convert any of the fact.
6 outlined it: ctu:. £15, that t have railed (rOCl the very outllet of theae
., proceeding •• And parlllllOunt conaiDtency require_nta of City pl.nnJ~ unda ... ·
e 16.10A..040 require con.htcney witb CPP and GEPA too. all' well •• general
, laws that are applicable to it under relevant proviaionll of 1a". and •• viII
10 be further explained In thia brief . It require. con.htency wieh the: entire
12 huge amount. of unmitigated trar-aportatlon difficulty. ",ater pollution that
13 they purport to diachllrge through 16 \Jntrealilld IItonn ",at er outh) h and II
into John'. Creek IIncS ~ke Waehington •••
Petitioner Re=~~Dc briel • 4
,
• ,
,
,
1I •• d JlJd':clJ_
:HOO If.~.:.·~r .
'~nlOQ. w.. "0)'
,
,
,
,
• "1' , .. . .
•
• icJ '. '. •
.' . ,
•
•
•
•
1 PetitlQne~ proaents this rosponle and brief, and now hereby reduced;
;> dCiraativlly and hwfully provin') tMIl pOltur" to be just and 1n h ... or at
l the ~etltion for Review hereinl with discu •• ion and review, (outlined,
• dOlflOnltntod, and cogently proven to be right and jllot henin) And herein
• subsequently dilcuaoel each lubject, how each 1 •• uo 18 related to
• non·~pli.nce with tho ~ and SEPAl and or courao, the juac and legal
., lawful rea.oning and citationa and oxcollltl at waabington t.&WI th3t the
, thl requul,. tor roliof: and that flNllt be applied in ordor to jUlltUy
10 the relief that h requested in chili Petition tor JlovJew under Haahingcon
11 1..210;.'. and the GHA and SEPA'.
"
11
PetitJoner Re~ponae brief -5
IUd IfJdl"bOll
'JOO JrI.&,.,,'$t. l.nlon. ~ •• ,.0S.
.nO
•
•
1
l
•
• ,
,
•
•
I.
11
1l
1J
15
, "
" "
18
19
2.
"
"
"~ " -"
"
,
10
'fAIn •• or CONTKJIT'/J
1. !:tal\dard o r RevIew And bul'dcn or proof
III . Llat or Exhibit. ( tabbed In order I
v ,
VI. A~~nt with citationa
VII. Cone) IJD ion
Petitioner Re~pon5c briel ,
',' .. ' , '
,
"
•
.. '
,
..
r
ftr." /f,dw>b<>n
"001 N.c.".'n.
J.ntcn . .,.. "" ..
" " "
•
, .
,
,
•
~'
, '
,
.-
' .
•
•
•
1 • I • "AtmUD OP "VIInf
A) Punu.ant to RCW ]&,10A.l10. cOIlSprehonaive plAna and developmtlnt
J regula~lona. And amendlllCnte theceto, IH "dopted pUnufln~ to the Act). are
.. pceaulMd v.lid upon .doption . The burden .h on the Petitioner to de~nCl~ra~e
5 that any action take:. by the rnpondent jurhdlction hi not in eOlflPlianee
, witb tbe Act. I have already proven the acttono to be in error Ilnd out.oide
, tke legiti_te cbjecttveD ot the Gct. 1 wHl again and heroin uthfy tho
• req\lired burden of proof in delXlnltratlng unlawfulneoa or their actlona and , their purported rezoning, (the Ac~lon ot ro~onln9 may not be prelu~ed Valid)
10 Ind tho burden reat. with the Proponenta (Intervenor.) I
11 Aa explAined herein, they have not utlafied their b\lrden.
II H) No preoul!9tion favoring rezoning exhte.' Thill foregOing requirement haa
U beccce irrelevant becauee petitioner haa, and wUI a9ain Ih:monotrate and
prove herein that the Actione conatitute arbitrary and capricioul apot
15 ~onln9 In vlolatiC'n ot applicable lawa,-
16 C) The Board ohould find compliance with t.he Act, unleao it deterMine. that
1'7 the City actiona are -:h: .. rly erroneoua in view of t.he entire record before
a the Board in 119M. o! the goslo and requirement.a of the OHII.... IRCW
If I!H.70A,l20)
1C l'T1lh ta the standard th.\t h! IIdhered to In thb bejeL
-
,
•
In_oj /llct",bon
3JOO H.I! .. lt'St .
•• nIOft. w., .'0"
..
• ,
..
,
" ... ;>. .. .
•
" , ,
. .' -
• ,
,
-
, .
,
. ,
•
.'
.' ., ,
,
"
-.
. .
'. ,
• .-
• ,
•
' .
•
._~~..I'~~_., __ .. ~_ ...... t'I ...• '.r." ....... ~ ... _ .. _ .. ~ __ ._,._,_,~_. .. ........ , ...... "'-'
I An arbitl'lIry lind ClIjlrlcJOUII "pot :toning ill " clCIII,r ond cogent error.'
1 Undor that DU):lI:tafltJal evidence utnndlrd, there IIIUll ~ '" Cluff iclent qUllnlulII
3 of evidence contAined .... ithin tho record to perBu"de '" Te"eonAble perGon that
-4 th., dod.red premlle 10 true,' 1 ",ill cUJaJn demonnT.teo Chill the quantu= of
S evidence IndicDte. that it 10 not the phn or will of the people, nor the
6 objecttve or our Olate L41wo, to iH!rforlll a",ell
., ,ilann1ng and to illlplcment Guch arbll'ury .nd cllpdclouo lI'.eilBurall.'
• A rcund or declaration oC invaUdlty ahould now enDue.
9 For the BOllrd to Und the Cit)" •• ctlon. clearly crroneCUD. the Boan5 tlUGl
10 be -left wh.h the UrlI\ And definitCl conviction that.. • IllJatAke haD been
II m.tde."u nit!! Doard. ofter reviewing thJP briefing and other evidence
" according to waahlngton !.;tOle, will be hft with .\lch a conviction.
II PuUUAnt to RCW l6 .10A.lZOl the Boord ahould grant deference to the City in
ho .... it plana for growth, only if Jt: hi conDiot.ent wh.h thl! gOflh a~
15 rcquirecentD of the O~~. Additionally, a~ our St.at.e Supre~ court hAC
Hi atated,
17 -Local diacretion ill bounded by the goa1m and requlrementa of the m'.A.,,11
II
19 ~ -A rcroning action ta~en ~ithout the '\lpport of r~qulred Rub.tlntial evidence t.
arbitrary And c_prlclou." aee,
20 It al . A£p!Uant •. " Nn .:ld ·Ut.
action 1. clelrly erroneou.· .ee.
rary and caprtcioul
"
"
"
,
, •
" ,
, "{'-on .... bpJOf!'.nr S.C. D<lP't . U Wn . "pp. ItT. 0'0), ttO P .2d ~'9 U,,'I {dung
~lrt ... "'plor-Int !Jac. Dlp't .• 2 Wn . AW . 10. )'t. U7 I'.ld n c:. rcY!cw dl'nied, 110
wn .2d lOOt . 925 1'.14 ,., IU~" I
, C~1\t t.l'tter nll'l'.ber U I Ruponae t.o COQIcnl lett.e,· 11 : rlnAl draft 1k>t!~"'!J
COmprehen.lyc rlan and rczonc CnYlro~Mftnt.al 1~~Cl St,"~nt.
If Per't ot .c:ol091' v . I'UV I , Ul Io'n .ld 179. 201 lunl
II Kfn9 eo~tr Y. C.ntrll Puget $ound Crowtb ~naq ... nt H •• rlng 'Gard,
142 Nn.2d !oU, !ot;l
Pet"l tionel' FI(!Dpont:~ brief -8 •• cad N."nol .'W!
.HDO ".~.Jf ·SI •
• ~Ion . w~, "O~f
• • ·
, . · · ,
•
"
, , .' •
•
· '. ., 1
" ",
,
•
•
'.
,', .
,
•
, , .
•
, ,
. .. . . ,
,
• r
o
1 FUrther.
our COUrt. ot LAw have atated,
"ConaJotant with LAw, ood
I "Tho Bo.ord "" p.ope.,y whon 't to ...... d.to"noo to a plan thot I. not
4 'eanoht.ne wIth the requirement. and 904la Of the CHA."n
, """ b.o.d dh,.,tlon .lIOWod to lOt., ,ov",nmento .ndor tho O.owth
• ...n ..... nt A<:t ,."" ".704) to d .. " tee'''hon.,vo P'.n. .nd d,v.'o_nt
7 "g.',,'on. ',on'ng o.d'nan, .. , tol1o"d to '0." eir."""t.n"o ,. 11."'d
• by tho .. quit.".nt that tin., ,I'n •• nd reg.'''lon. be tonototont v'th th,
, IQndataa and goal. ot the act". U
" Wh, ... 'Ot.' ordln.n" .annot b. h'n>onl"d with • ,ontllttlng otat.t., the
II "".to , .... U •. • 10tO' ",dlnon" 'ontllt" vlth • Otot.t. {f it ,.=It.
" that which the .t~tUtea forbid or forbida that which the .tat\ltap permit •. "
11 • .... dlng the .d.qu.,> ot tho £IS. the "S ... " , .... no dOtI.'oo "k,,, vith
II re •• onably tf'~rou9b diacuaaion of the probable .igMitieAMt adverae i~p.ct.
15 AUocbted ... .!th the propo8.ll1.
16 The adequacy ot an envirOnmentAl impact .t.te~nt i •• queation of l~w that
17 In lIubjcC't to de novo review both on the .dminheUtive level And by the
18 COurt •. The leg/llJ /IIdequacy of /lin envJronl:lent/llJ imp..ct .t/lltel'!lent ill teeted
,. .nde, the rul0 ot '."on. Und,. the rule ot r"'on, .n .nv'
rO
nment.l I .... t
,. .t.t'''nt , •• d.qu.,. only 't 't ,'ov'd ••• r ••• on.bly tho.O •• h d"cu"'on ot
"
"
"
•
II t'oo r Polt1t A.aocJaUan v. t'buTatan COunt, 110 . ~'4lS.1.JI
Div. U , Sept~r' H. 2DD1) , 101 II'n . App . 429 I~OOll.
PerJtior.er ReDpon8e brJe! • 9
•
" ,
•
,
ar .. d NithDhOfl
.UOO N.I:,I,'::"
'.nton, _.. "05~
• .. , .
•
'. •
••
:. : .
•
''''~
, " . . ,
,
J
1
.,
•
•
•
• ,
, . ... . ,
1 propoaed Activity and preOentD DutticJent JnrO~tJon to allow the
2 governmenul dechion-makera to make An In(of"l:led and n:uoning dccilslon."
l .. nd cAprJcloul _cUOnll are 9!tneully doUned by blot to be wlllru}
• unrelulonlng action8 taken in dhreglrd or tacta and circuIII,tanee.a
S A finding i, clearly erroneOUD when, even if there 10 evidence to eupport It.
• ,
• ,
10
11
"
IJ
••
15
"
"
11
"
'0
"
" ,.
"
tho reviewing body on the entire evidence of record, I, lett with the
and tim convjction that .& mistake h •• been ComNltted.11 It muat
ly apply to All."
n
.... polld~t.
ll), 910 P.2d 1207 (Aug.
IhThe bet thAt the diljunctive ',.-.how. U ... Acting dther "rbitnrUy .. Wo ,
is l,I.~d In the f irat. p.lrt ct tn .. IUtut.
or clpradouIll' .. Ul cr •• to I e''''lo of j~f:~~~~~~~~~~~!:~~~~r~: 11. Wn . ld . '1. leI .al.o. 70t P .2d "1 An .~lnlltr.atJve
II willful. unr~.a.onlng . &n4 ~dc wl th~t
ion .nd In dllr~.ard ot the t.aClI .an4 clr~ .. t.n~ea .
n V::l .ld 2".
•
lupre~ court ,peclfl~.ally decIded tAat police r.gullt'on~ were
equal protection cllule of the f ourteenth '~~nl In Atcbl.oc. TOpe.1 ";;;'";~~~~~~~~~~~~; 238 U.S, !O,. 5' L.rd , U", )5 t .Ct . n~. Ttle rI'lall I~, were .t.t~d II r ol lowa .
'"But ... e Clnnot It III 'grel tAat a ~101ice n :gulatlon h not. Uk. lin>' other h ...
to the equll protection cllule of the rourteenth k~ndr~nt.
"The eonltltutlcnat guaranty cntitl •• III perlonl Ind COrporation, ... Ithin the
of the State to the protection o f eqult t..... in thll al in other depart~nta of govorn=ent. -It doel not prr~nt cl.a'litlcltlon, but doea require th.;
cla.,ltle.tlon Ihalt be rrl.onable. nnt arbitr.ary, and thAt It Ihall relt upon
dllthl~tlo", h.aving I tatr and .lSllblunthl reht lon to the objoct 'ought: t o be
ICC'Clr.'pthhed by the lcghlation",
Petitioner ReDpDnDe briel _ 10
~r.d NIC'boJaon
2Jco 1f.l:.2"SL
JI~I OI'I, ..... "C),:
,~--•• " .... --.--,...,,-'!~--" = , '"
-L • ,
•
.
,". -,
"
'. '.
'. ,
"
•
" , .
• •
• ,.
,
•
-
•
.~ • .
•
Yo , ,
• ,
• •
I L
, ,
•
o
1
, :1. ADDITIONAL STAiLKkWT OF IBSUWB
1
4 1 . hi the £lS at: .heue here thAt .... ".. perton=ed relevant to theae actiona
• legally adequate,
1 baaed upon unro •• onable or erroneoua nu~er of tripo?
• l . Are tbe i~ct. to •• leon "peciea understated, or ~re they baaed upon
•
I.
11
"
11
•
15
"
"
11
,. ,.
"
"
"
"
"
"
pr •• u~tion. thAt vcre not analy&ed according to lIS or Beat Available
Science requirements?
Petitioner Re#pon~e brle!
••
~. , . ..
•
. "'
11
"
"
"
• •
•
•
Jlr.d tIIdlOhOil
2Jac N.r .1"Sr. .... lInt ..... Itll . "as'
': . •
•
" , ,
,
' . • ', ..... , "
• , •
..
•
i
, ..
,
•
1
1 j
" ,
, ,
" , , ,
,
• , , " ,
,
" •• "' ... " ... t • «
o
1 In. LIar 0 ' UJIIInTIJ
J 11 City Hinuteo at adoption of ordinAnce&! Unt:luded .... 1th Petition tor: Rovhwl
) lIuring I!.urnlner limiting order (inc:ludl!d wIth J'Ildt.lon (01" R~vi(!w)
" lJ Copy ot III po1geBmotJon lind brJef tiled with City lIurJng £)r.alll1ner
5 !included wit.h Potition tor Review)
II 4' Copy or elty c:~r(!h(!noiv(! plan economic development clement lincluded , retitlon (or Review)
• Exhibit. tabbed for thio brio! (tobbed 1-12 referred to •• 5.1 :hru 5.12)
, 5.) City C~plt.l (Acilletco element (tabbed 11
10 S .ll Lettel'" of Hr. l..\rry WAn'cn dated January 22, 20041 , (tabbed 21 -
11 S,JA) City ot Renton ordinlllnc:e U9U •
12 City or Renton ordinance 'liDO
11 Two economic: devel~poent ol(!~~nto
j PlAnninq cOrm'lilloion letter dllttid lIovt'lt.ber 19 . lOO)
15
" City of Renton Policy [or Protection ot S~loonid S~c i eu
11 5 .1) Three clipplngll 11 eoncerning IIpeciell extinctionl 11 concerning ..
11 region.! phoning error aillli l~r to herel lone concerning IIIAC.Iv!! pubt ic
"
21
"
Reoolution 1:0. 364 J
PAccar, Uoelng. "lid Boeing Reility comnent City lIIinute.
Copy o( Reaolution .lG4l
Copy o[ HearIng Examiner tIS deCillion
J~tltloncr Reuponuc brie! • 1:
'~-~-'-"-__ '",' ,,,,,,,,.'7_.'~' •
aud Hjel'lob ""
':JOO N ,~.Z"'!.
'.nfOl'l .• '" "ou
--, ' .' L, ," , ':' '
. ,
" • '., . ,
" , ' . .. ..
,
, "
,
,,~~ "
. . .
•
,
,
•
-
"
,
•
..
,.
•
,
,
"
fi.
" • •
.. ,
,
1 IV,
The PartieD and tho City ahould and mule: be trying to Clncour~ge productivCl.
1 and tnjOY<lble hllrmony bClt~ecln IMn lmd the environment" And in the oath ot the
4 otflcel and executive leaderahip pOlitico. releVAnt here And of authority.
5 there are certain reoponaibilltiel th.t everyone that 10 involved In thie
6 .etlon ahould already inherently kno~, and hold an parA-ount and neceo •• ry to
• • good deal ~rCl, like I origtnally contended, thin JUDe: the financial goal.
, ot the PI'"Opollent..]I
10
11
1: 1< RCW U .:IC.010 PurpoIU .
The J!'.Il'"JlC)lel ot t.ht. ctuoptpr IrCII III To <iccl.)r e • IItato pol ley _hleh wt 11 Clncouuge
11 J'roctuC'tlve and enjoyable hlll"ll'.ony belli.ell~" .na hi,. C!nvlro nl\OelJl j 1)1 to (lI'"OIIIOt.
"teortl ... hich .. ill prevDnc: or .1i .. hl"'t ~ d.tto/l~e t o tho tlnvi ron~nr And I>IO'phero, III
and Iti~l't" the heal!:h and _Uanl ot "",n , .nd '.1 to I:lIri ell ti,., ufllitluland1~ of
ch., e['OI09lc"l 'YUll!-lI' and NlCllrA\ rellourcfl, ill'.portllnt to ttl, al.,U" """4 lin ion, lint .X". e 10' S 1.1 15
I. RCV u .nc.o:o Le<gialativ. rec09nltion, •• ~cl"r.tl on"lhtllll(,."I"lbH ILy.
18
01 Th. )~hlature. reeognl:r;t~ that ~n dfJMInd , on Ith blt)Ii)o)i c;al .M plty.ieal
lurrou.n:Ung, for fOOd, ,helter, end Other n'.d_, am! l o r a l1lurat '''U'h:llI~ent 'I we)),
lind recog:nzlng [un her the prOfound illfJllct of e",n 'lI activ1ty 0(1 1.1, .. i nt.rrel'Uon, ot
.11 c~ponent. of the r.atural envlr~nt , PIIrticul.rly the pro f ~lnli influenc •• of
l' population growth. hlgh.den,ity urbanization, lndulcrlal e'~nelon, re'ou.rce
ucllizlltton and exploitlltlon •• nd new .nd e'~ndin9 technolog i clil advllncel and
'0 rec~lzJng further the critical igporcancl of relto~ln~ and mainl.ini~ .nviro~nLal
quality to th. overall ~lfar. and dev.l~nl 01 ~n. decll1re. th'e It t. the
eont1nuil'lg poitey of the Itlt. of II.Uh1119ton, .In COOperation ... ittl f .. der.l and locAl goYern~nt~, .nd ether ccncetned public and prlVate orgAnization_, to ul e .11
practicable ~_n. and ~1I.ure •• 1neludl"9 Clnanci.1 .nd technical AI.tat.nce, In"
.. nnet calCUlated to. I., Fo.ter and Pl'(lllOt(I the general "'eUa,,,, Ibl to cteate and .aint~ln ecn4lticn. under wh'ch ~'n and nlltur. can .xllt in prodUCtive ha~ny: .nd
ICJ fulfill th. 'ocl.1. e::oft(EIIlc, ar.d other requirer"'nt' 01 pre"IIlt and tuture
II EJS letter nulllber 13
Petitioner Ret/pontic bri ef _ 1)
lIurl lIlo;ho hon "oa 1t.1:.2.'$t.
III UI t OIl, "'.. .,,, It
I I I
, ',..·"·---7······.,.--~.,,. ... ~ ..... "' .... · .. "',.2"''<''!~ ....... ~ .. '''"..''' .. llOlGor~ .. ~ ...... !'~~:'' .. ':': ___ :-:'~
'. ".
, , '.
,
,
• , .. •
,
"
,\" ; , , , , ., , ,
" ' . '. " " " " . ' ,
•
,
•
,
1
•
•
, c.
o -,
,
,
. ,
"
• .
. '
'"
"
• .~ , :.", L '1. tar , : .... ' " -'
o o
1 They hUG not lived up to their rellpondbiUtJu. and toll!. boud II ••
J jurhdlctJon bec"UIltl all AgencJu of the tt.lle lTe Co be conahtent ",Ith • " l Ctat.e pollelell.u One previalon ot Dratll: Poliey .lIould not eblot.n. another. Tbe
• renona behind lhllt very lI':\.ich dell'.onCltrlle .... hy it Iii 40 very l",portanL.u 1t
5 h •• been very clearly articulated by the )cghlAt.ure ,u
, ,
,
8 II (2) In ord"r to CArry out. thn polley let torth in th1l cM.ptor. it h the con~lnui
rClponltbillty or the atato 01 ~ •• hifi9ton and all .g~ne'CI. oC t~ Itate to v.a all
9 pr.c~ic.bl. ~.n •• conalatent with ether o ••• ntlal con.ideratlonl or at at. policy. to
'aprova Ind coordt~t. plana, funCtlonl, pr09r.~ •• and ra.ource. to the ond that the
10 at ate and It. clttlen ..... yl
Ca' tulUll eh, ra.ponatbUitillA of ., • .::1'1 ger.u·Allon a. lruUCOO! or the I:nYlr~!)t" Cor
11 lIucceedtng gllneratlonal
Ibl Anurlll lor .11 people of IoIAllhirl9to:\ .1Il,., hlll .. lt.htul. prochlctivt!, .nd alllthlltic::4l11y
12 .nd culturally pla.llM9 lurroundlnglll
Icl Attain the ... Idelt rang., ol benlllficial Ullef ot t~ conyJron-ent wltb~t dt!9~a~tiotl,
1) rlak to health or •• fett. or other UI~ellrlble Ind unintended ccneeqUllnccll
••
II ftC'll U.10A.OI0
15 The le!9hlature fin..:h thbt uneo.Jrd!rtatl"d .nd uuplannord 9roooth, t03et.h .. r ."It.h • l.ck: ot
cOllftCln goah ellpreeehl9 the publlc'l i(Hereat 111 ttl" cQn"","",tltion and the "he u.e of l' our land., poe ... thrc., to the .nvlr~nt, _ulltalnable econo.lc d.,velopaont, .nd thc
hellth, I.flllty, and high quality,of tite en'~d l~ re.1dent. Of this at.at •. It i. In
17 thlll public Ir,erillat that clt.lrlln •• c~nlt l t" loe.l ~ovllr~t •• e nd the prlv.~s
IIlIctor cOOf'f'I'atlll .Ind cool'Juulle wit.h one .nvt h.r in c",,-prehtntlve lan:2 ua. plannlr:g .
11 Further, tho 1~lalalure flnde t~t it I, In. the public inte, .. _t th.t eec~Jc
d .. yelOf01111t prc<Jr .. u· .• be .. bflred "ith coe:r.unitie. elllper1Gnc:ng in" .. ttichmt "cOll~1c
19 growth .
,.
"
21
u ltC'll U .21C.O)O
RtllOrt." ·Myic.· ·lntOl'e4tJon.
Th .. h'ghlallire "'"thorht!s and d t recta tllllt, to ttl'" (ullon !:Ixtent po ... !tlle , 111 ':1Ie
poltcte., r~u lAtlon., And law, ot the .t.te 0 1 ~"hl"9ten .t~ll be lntorpr",ted and
ad:olini.tered 1n .Ccord .. nce ."ith th .. pol ici ... ut rl)rth in thl' chlpt.er, and (;OJ all
br.nehlll of QoYernf!lot:nt. ot thh .tate . tncb .. Uf>..] ~utll\ a!)er.d ea, eun1C'ip41 and put>l~c:
col~r.tlon., .nd countJe, .1'1,111
24 ,., UtiHu a .yatl!!fIIIIIUc, lntordi.C'ipl1n.ry .ppro.eb ..-hier.-,,111 In,utl!! tt." .lnt.-gtotted
ute o f the n4tllul fltld .oe,a! selenee. and Lt,e enyiff>ll:rcntal dee-Ign an.' in ,'hnninJ
2~ and in dee1.1on Nklrlg "':Ilch CIo'Iy holve an l"'PAct on .... n·. env"on,.t;lnt/
htJtlcmer Ret1p¢I).fJ bde! . 14
" ,
.) • o
I .
·---.·-..,.~o., .•••. _ .,.
..
•
..
.r .. ;1 UH'!lDJ_
':100 It ••• .:.·/I, ,,,",_, It.-, ... au
--,If
•
•
•
•
•
..
,
. ,
,
•
,
, ,
"
• , .
,
'.
,
"
1 The 9041. of til" 1.}f "wt.h Managemenl Act are «utcIlla1".,. ar.d other-objective. of
:I "the Proponent ~nd C~~;-are outeidc of the act,n
l
•
•
•
1
•
•
10
"
"
II
1< ,.
10
11
" ,.
2.
21
"
" ,.
"
----_.-
I. ReM l'.701i..OlO Plann1D9 9031 ••
Ttl", follovlng g~h .ro ado(lud. to glild. the d"volo~nt. and .doption ot C'c.pnhotnl1ve
phn. and de".lopeellt rC!'!)"llI.tlon~ or tho at C'OUnt,1e1 and ch.if:1I that <Ire r~qulr.d or
chOiJ •• t o phn under RCV )'.1011..0.0. The [011,,,,1"990lI011 an not Ihtod In order of
prlcz 'ty .rod .~11 be u,,,d exelualYoly tor the purpoa" oC 9uid1ng tho develop.ent of
e~nhUld". phu., and dt .... lor.-nt r~lIbtlon.,
il) Ur~ growt h . Eneourage deY.l~nl In urban arc •• wher. adequate public
[lIIc'11tlclI and .~rvlce. C.Jlt or c~n be provided In an ettici,nt ~nnor.
III neduce .?rawl. R~lIc. the Inappropriate conyeralen of und.~eloped l a nd Into
Iprl~ling. lew-den. tty d.v.lop.a~t .
13) Tranlportltlon. Encouraga afficient .ultlmodal tranat rlatlon 'yltl&& that Ira
~.ed on regional prlcrlt1ea and eoordtn~tad with county and city ~rehen.lvl pllna.
(4) Hou.lng. £ncovra9a the Ivallability of ~tf o rdable huUJlng to all IconORlc
alg$entl ot the population of thl •• tate, pr ... te a variety ot rlaid~ntl41 denaitl.a
and haualng type', and encoura9_ prnaerv.tlon o[ ,.,.tlng houai~ .toek •
IS) £c:QfKD;ic: d.yel~e.nt . tncouras, aconoealc deYltor-nt throu!lhOllt tho atlh thlllt 11
con. I. tent with Idopted c~r.hen.1Y' plan •• p~l' economic opportunity for .11
cltiz.na of thia atlta, .epeclally for une~loy.d Ind (or dl.adY.nt~ged peraonl.
promote the retention Ind eApAnaJon o! •• I.tlng bu. In""" end recrultcont of naw
bu. In •••••• r'C09n1,e regionll dllference' l-rattlng ccono-Ic dcvelo~nt
QPPOrtunltl.l. Ind encourage growth In Itel •• x~rl'ncln9 inlut!lclent econo=ic
g~h. III within the capacl~los of the Itlte'a natural r •• ourcea. public •• evicel,
Ind public facllitie ••
'" Property righte. Privlte pr0p4rty .~11 not be tlken for public UI~ vith~t jUlt
cc.pens.tion ~ving ~en mAde . Tho property rlghta of lAndownerl lhall be prot.cted
tro-arbitrary &nd dilcrialnatory Ic~lcnl .
171 Peralta. AppUcatJonl tor bo~h !lUte "nCS loeal 1jt"Y ernll>Clnt peralta Ihould be
prece •• cd In a ti .. ly and tlir .. nner to en.uro predictlbillty.
ell ~tur.l resource 'ndustrie,. HAintlin Ind enhance nltural relourc.·b1.ed
indultrlel. Including produ~tlv. tl~r, Igricultural. Ind (ilheriet iReSultr1e ••
En:ourlgo the conlervltlon ot productive fore.t Ilndt Ind productive Igricultural
lands. Ind dllcourlg. incocpatlble uae ••
", Open apace Ind recreation . R.tain open 'plce. enhlnco recreltlonll opportunitlel.
ccnlerve filh In~ wildlife habitat. lner."se Iccell to natural retource lInda and
vater. Ind deYllOp parkl Ind recreation racilitiol.
ItO) !nylror.aent . rrotect the t:tnylronDmt and enhancl' the Itate'a htDl1 qu.llty o(
lite. includl"9 air "nd vater qullity. Ind the IYI11.b111ty of wlter.
1111 Citiaen partlcipatlon Ind coordiQ,1.ticn . Encourage the Involvement of citiaenl 1n
the plann.~ proct:tll an~ enlur. coordinltion betveen e~nttle. an~ jurildiction. to
reconcile conlilcti.
1111 Public facllitie. Ind .ervlce.. En.ure thlt thoBe public faclliti.a and Ilrvlcel
ne~.II'ry to luppert dcvelopnent Ihal1 be Idequate to lerve rhn devftlo~nt at the
draa the developll>Ont la avallabl. for occupancy Ir::I u.e without dccreallng cunent
I.evice leyela below locllly ertabllshe~ ~lnl~$ atlndlrd ••
PetJtJcner ReQ~~De brJet -15 Jlnd "id:ot.on
JJGG H.It. ,,'St .
•• n!Gn. ~.. "05'
•
•
...... '--_ .• _-_ ... __ . .,."'".
" • , , , , , •
" ,
.< ," • " ..
• • • •
, , • .. ,
" .'.' t
.' , , . . , .
•
•
~ , .
' .
. ,
, .' , .
••
.'
, ,
, 1
• ,
L
'y
• • ,
, • . :
.... ,_., ... '( •.• ".f' .. <_n:."~ ... I0.,", ..... ,,'-.;:. .. "
o
1
It ohould be very clear and cogent to a)l concerned that tbe purpoae of .11
2 ot thae:e proccedlnga arc Cot: pur-pone of the healt.l., , .. !ety, 900e,..1 vcUau.
land rnonlll ot the pubUC,H %onltuJ ordin~nee. and the context ot: tbel"r
,
5 plana, with or .... Ithout: ... htancc [r()lll tho Proponent, It. ,.lIould co=ply witb
G all of the conaiDtcncy and Iqtlcmenullon requlrc1b!Int.. of t.he act,l.
7
•
• ~, JtC'N 1,,'10 .(110 PI.Irpoa., and Infent .
10 The purpo'" and Intent of ttda c.'W.pteC b to provide ttHI alit.harh·r fo r. ~M t.he
procoCure. to bo followed In. qutdlng .n4 fe?Vlatlng t.he phy.ical d.velo~r.t ct a
11 count.y or re9 ion through correlating bolh public .nd private projectl and coordlnat.lng
th"lr •• ecution Villi ro,peel to .II .ub,.c t .. nt.eu utUlled In (k ... lor£r.g and.
11 servicing land, 011 to the .enO of ",uring the hlgne.t .t.n4&rd. ~r envit~nt tot
llvl",g. atld the operatJon ot c:~rc: •• I.nc!:.o.t.ty •• gric:ultlu" anc1 r.er ... tion. and
13 IIluring .. d~ ec:oncel.o •• 114 t'Cn.ervlnq the higll .. "t detJree of pubUc: ht'.\lt.h, ufoty •
.. .oral. anO wei far •.
Unlol' t.he ronte_t clearly require. otherwl •• , the 4e(lnltlon. In t.hl. ,ect.ion applV
t.hrovtlhout U IU chapter. tl) "~t a ~rehen'IV. land u •• ptan" .e.n. to enac t. new ccepr.hen.ive l.nd \lap
17 pl.n or t o \l~te an c~i.ting t~r.hen.lv. 1~nc1 \l.e pl.n .
t" 'Devel~nt regul.tiorc" or "rlll9\1 1.tlon" .... n. the ¢eatrol. pl.ced en ~¥elapment
11 or land UI' .ctl"id •• by • COWIty or city. Inc:hdlnl). but. net U&.t ed to. f.onin<J .
ordinance •• crltlc.l .re •• ordinance', ,horellnc: ~It or progr.=a. ~f ttcl.t control ••
l' pl.nned unit d.yelo~nt or4inanc. ••• ubdlvl.lon or4i~nce •• and biDding .ite plan
20
"
"
~.t l-rl~nt coepr.hen.lv. pl.n ••
HI ffoch county that he. bOth. pDF\Il.tlon of fif t y tl\OVaan6 or lIO'I'"e .nd. until Ioby
1'. I"S. h •• had it. popul.tlon 1ncr ••• e by -ore tha~ t..n ~reenl In the p,.vi~1 l.n
(t.r. or. on or .tter ~y l', l"S. n.. n.4 It. l Cpul.tion lncr~"~ by DOr~ t~r.
.evllntclln percent in the. pre-dOll' un yell.," .n4 the Clue' loc.ted. >ll thln .ueh
county. and 'ny other county re9.r41 .... ot It. population L~t hal ~4 it.a popul.tlon
Jncre •• , by ~re than lYenty ~,cent. in ~he prevl ou. ten ye.r ••• ~ the ci~le. located
wlt.llln a\l(:h cOIJnty. ah.J,!l ccnto ..... ith In n t ttl'" rt'!lVlre.ent. c.f !-I,l' chApter .
. ..-,-:------:--................... .,-
".oJ HlCbal#PII
;0100 ~_.k .2'·sr..
,.nt OCl .... _ jlO""
..... \11(" , .. ' .-
•
•
.,
.'
: .
. :
:,
.. : .:
" " ••
•
•
•
: .
.., ,
" ..
,
"
.. . . ,
o
1 1 will turtber dte rule. oC the BOArd following: thh pangraph. but tha Cit)'
l COftl .rehenlh,'" p\3n muat bet conllhtent with the King county I'ramewo.k Palida"
1 ICPPJ. Th~t i, • ~nd.tory requ1re~ent of tho OMA,)' The City evidently do ••
5 CPP, but that 1. illegal .1 will be expl.l~ed further. There aro certain
'7 the GttA and ntp".··
•
•
10
11
"
13
••
"
"
" ..
"
"
21
"
"
"
"
u IIC'II )&.')00\.100 CO!rpnhanllve planl"Hua:t be coordi~ud .
Th. c~reh,n.lw. plan or each county or city that 11 adop,.d pur.u~nt to ReM
",10"',040 .~11 ~ eoordlnated with, and con.lllf-nf with. the ~preh.n.ive planl
.dopt~ pur'~nt to RCW ]',70"',040 of other count! •• or eitS •• with Yhich the cc~nty
or city h.I, in ~rt. coamon bordera or rllated r~ional 1 •• u ••.
10 kCW )','0 .... 010 Coe:prehcn.' .... planl--I'Qn:,t.1otory ale\MInta.
The ~rehen.i~ plan of a eounty or eity that i. required or ehoc.el to plan ~ndar
RCW )'.~CA .OtO ahall eonai.t of a aap or ~p •• and deaerlptive text covering
objective •• prir:iplea. arA .ta~rd. Ulld to davelop the co-pr,hen,lve plan. The
plan lhall be an internally eon_iltent ~nt and all ele~nt •• hall bo eon_i'tent
.. !th the fIIt ... re land ... a. I!I4p. A coepnher.elve plan ahAlI be Idopted .nd IlIItellded .. lth
public partiCipation .a provided in RCW l'.70A.ltO .
Each cocprehenatv. plan '~ll include a plan. eehe~, or d •• 'gn for eleh of the
fOllowlDIJ I
III A capit.l l.c111ti •• plan ele~ent con.i.tJnq of . CI) An 1nventory 01 exi.ting
~pit.l f.eilitiel owned by public entitlea. ,lIowing tha loc.tion, and c.peeitte. of
the c.pit.l IIel.11t18111 Ib) a foree.n of the future neede tllr e ... eh capital
beilitiul Ce) the Pr'OpOud locationa .nd clpacitle. of upended or new c.pltal
tacl11el •• , Cd) at le.at I aix-year plln that "Ill tinance .... ch capital tacilitie'
vlthin proj.et~ I ... ndir~ eapacltie •• nd ele.rly identlfte. lourcaa of public money for
.... cn purpo •• al and C., a reQUlreeent to rea.ae.a tha land ~a" .le~nt It probable
funding tall. ahort of DG"ting .~iattn9 need. and to on .... t. that the lend 1,100 eleDent.
capltll tactllti., plan ale~nt, and financing plen within the capital f.cllit!e. plan
~) ... nt ar. coordi~ted and conolotent. 'ark And recreation facllitie. ahall be
'"tluded In the capital tacillt! •• plan .le~nt.
PecJtJoner Re~pon:Je brJet • '17
.ud I;Ild>oJaOf'l
~J(!O 11.1:."'51 • •• "l~. v.. ,.as,
"
,
'.
•
..
•
,',
,
~ ,
~ ,
• ,
• -,
•
•
'0
'.
" II
"
"
15
1 "
"
" •
"
'0
"
• "
" , ,.
"
'.
"I
• ,
, '
,
"
•
• . ..
, '
o o
•
p'"'' , nDW ... 1th tho.t purported revioion h incclflailltent and conflict'" wlth
CPP.lI Renton haa now purported to "dept. comprahenoJve. ph" that
ot economic t
~!!...!!~:"':~"!:5!!.!!!:!!..!.IU"'-"'l<J,",""~. "t tho 11&'.0 t hl'.e . they
,dver.a locial and aeonolde: conoequenceJl of doing no." -
T1>"y Instelld rel}' upon an urban center delign.lltion that .. a. ad"pted tor tho
Renton Central BUlllnclID DJatrlct ICDD). not the IIcavy JnduDtrial %oneil
---,----
II 1. Strengthon. t:.o:pand, find t''''eul!} the tCCllOllY IC'PJ'I
rD " 1.4:;:11 juriadiction •. "lonl ,hall lnch.do poUd •• th.\. actively I;lIpport the
rltcntton ond o.~n.ion ot tho r.conoalc t. •• of the ~ltl·County regIon . ~.t j,::r!,:::!":::~::~ lind Ihc County 1114111 work coJOPtlrotholy on • r~ionill b,ui. lind ,""ILIt ~ lector p~rticl~tion to Dyaluat~ tba trenda. opportunltle~ and wea~aaD' 0'
exlallng economy and to analy.. p.eono.lc needa ot key Induetrle •. 12!!l
~1:~:f.~~~ eJlp..nUor.. alld ~ the creatlll9 no::'" jC>t: ••
,h.l1 cooporate to ,," ec~no-tc dlyer.ltle.lien and
goal. tor th" ~ltl·County rD9 lon . Juriedlctlon •• ~Il. in prece.e ot
pllllnning. 'dent1fy CDnulbuuon they .. ill r.'Io1ke t o the rl"<Jional
anoj devdopr.omt
.. '1~IrJng £x.~lner Order and ReeponaD to lettnr n~r 11
Po,,'''''''' Rellpon.ac brJet • 111 "~4d /'i'j<.'1>Cbllft ~J UI II.C.J.'St.
' .. "I (IIl , "' ... ties,,"
•
•
1
'rl -_.-:, --~ .. ·-----------"'--.. ,-, .. ·0------.......... 5'.,." ....... •• ...... --'I ,..j -
•
· : •
"
. "
.. -.
•
,
,
, '
• ,
,
;
,
"
•
.. , .
. "
,
1
,
l
• ,
•
, , ,
•
•
10
. .
, 11
• 12
1)
.. ..
, .
"
16
"
II
,.
,.
, .' "
" "
" ,.
" •
," "1-,
,
."
•
•
, ,
-..
•
,
,
, . . , . ,
•
ThO' adrllinhtrativt! procodure. th,,1; are ulled are very clf!lIt' And uliliombiguOUI
when it c~. to enluring infr •• tructure Jo adequate at the time the
develop~nt. vould be re~dy tor occup~ncy.1o WAC ]65-1'5-750 outlinec tholle
It WAC "~·19S·'OS auk ... Ylr.PLJOOill .
11 1 Where the l~t.l.tur. ha. _pukeR l.pr •• lly on the relation,hlp ot tho ICt to other
Itatutory proviaiona, the •• plieit I.gillatlYII direction. ,h.ll be carried out.
C~l •• ot alleh e-vre •• pro.ialonl Ire .et fOrth in w~C ]65-1'5·150.
121 AbIent. clear .tat~nt of legillative intent or judicial Interpret_lien t~ lhe
contrary, it .lIouid ~ pr.'lIeled th.-t neither tile Ict nor athaf Itf,tut •• Ire Intended
to be preemptive. Rather they Ihould be con.Jdered tog.thor and, .horover po •• lble,
con.tfY~d A. ~t~'11y ~onQi.tont,
1\ 'lAC lU.19S-,)~O t:xplkit .ae~lotY dlnction.,
III In Ipprov~ng tho Growth ~~90~nt ACt, the legl.lature eapro.ely .~nded nuaerOUD
exiating atatute •. On lhe ftactar. thoy at~ro'l. tholo '~ndmentl defin. tho
ralaeien.hlp oC Iuc:h oxtlting atltute. to corprehonatve plana And developaent
regulltiona under the act. ~a.p)ee .re.
III RCW 1',2'.0" 'Itlto building code -OYidonce ot ad.quate ecpply of potable
"'Iter.)
(bl RCW l5 .1l .DD5 Iinnexotion ot unJncorpor.t.~ IrOI. _ prohibited beyond ~lban 9r~th
ar"I.1
Ic. RCW )5 .51 .1"S '~n icipal co~r~tior.l _ li.-year tranelt plan conltotont with ~
eo.prahlnlivo plAn~I
Cd) RCW ]5 .".010 Icily Itreeto -Il.-year c:omprohon.lvo .treot progr~ coneietent
with CKA eoeprehenlive planJ)
'el RCW lSA.14.00S I.nne~tion by cod. citlll -prohibited ~yon4 urbAn growth IreAI'
ttl RCW ".81 .1l1 Icounty road. -.lx-y.ar eoeprohen.{ve r~d pt09raM eonalDtent wl~h
~ comprehonllve plaool
Igi RCW )'.'4 .040 I ...... rag •• v,nlt. drAinage IYltelll.ll -incorpoToltion ot rele .... nt
coaprehen.ive plln provilJonD into .e~."r or ... "ter goneral III"nl
Ihl RCW 5'.O'.OlO Ilever dl.tricta _ d11trtCt co=prehenltve lower plln conel.tont vlth
ur~n 9r~ If.a reltrl~tlon.1
111 ~CW 57 .15.010 ''''''tor dluricu _ dhtrlct ccxr.prehenDive wlter phn conliDtent villi
utban growth Ire. re.trletlon.l
']) RCW ~'.1~.0'0 (anort pllta • written finding. _bout Ippropriate previ.ion, (or
lotraltlNeturo)
Ikl acw SI .l'.110 (.wbdlvi.lon. -writton flr~l~e olbcut appropriate prevl.lon. for
iflfrae:;ructurol
:11 RCW 51 .II .HO l1.mt develOV-nt -au~ho rlty of Gt'.II pl\nnln'J ontltlot to requ~re
relOCAtien ae.l.t"n~.'
,-, R:W ".ll .l00 (coeprehon.ive flood control ~na9~~nt plln. -~y be inoorporolted
Into c~rehene~vo plan. under the actl
III "pprovlll of the act includod the crOitien of a now elUlph .. leh.\ptor n.llo Rcwl
authoridng and ,1II1J9nu'19 dutiu to rl'9hmal tran'J'CIrutlon pla •• ,.lng otl)anlutlonl
I~·.,. ~eD' organlration. ve r e e_pre •• ly given ro.ponclbilitiea tor en.urln~ the
~.i.t.ncy o~ trsn.pertation pl'nnlng thrOll'J~~t _ r~lon eont.inlng ftUltiplo lOCAl
go¥e~ntal j~rl.dictlon ••
U) Arproval of the act lnelll4ed the Iddltlon of new IOction. IRCW n .Ol .o!.O through
'~.Ol .O'OI ecnc:ornlng lePlct toe. on developecnt in countlea or citle. that plan under
:ht: ~A. ~ele .eetlon. explicitly Aut~~rire and COndition the ueo of .uch feo' ••
par: of the financing or public tac11ity IYlt~. iaprove .. ntl needed to letve n~w
do"'el~nt •
IIr .. d Hirhohon
o1J"" N.I:.o1,'8t .
",.nten. If... "_H
~~----'--'-'~"'-""""-"'-"" ..... .oo;;",~~~"", ___ -_ .~~. oa::l lib ~ _
,
, ,
,
,
--
"
~.,
"
"
.' .
:-,
f"~' . '!b _q c ,~ •. . .
"''1, ..
.. ' ....
•
'. ,
. I
• • , ,
•
•
"
,
,
"
"
• , .
.
•
;
• ,
•
.'
~"' __ ~;"'''''''''''''';i''". __ ., .•.• __ _
1
,
,
•
5 ,
,
• ,
,.
11
"
1)
15
"
11
o
The City evcn hAD alatt'ld itult that. the JII".pllct teu ohould be illpoacd and
adopted under the ClM," The lcnhlaturc hu cleIDrly detlned how thou (('Jell
c:.n be legAlly impcDed to atldreu the cu,"uhtlve JlIIflo1Ct. o( project .... hen
tht'y aridc, Jlnd t110 rennonll (or that OJlPliCbtJUn(jThC P.cnton ordinance
IItllled th"t thll:!Y would cQll:{Jly with lhe act. but it hall ne ... er h.ppened,"
U tllJ\lblu !t.)A and !i .lD •
It _tv Il.Ol .050 Ilrpact tee.-·Jntent··U .. ltat,on ••
111 It 1. the intent ot tho legl/llalur.,
'I' To en.uro that adequate Cacl11tlea are available to .erwe nev growth and
d.v.l o~ntl
Ib) fo promote orderly 9rovth and davelopcenl by e.t.bll.hJ~ .t.~rd. Dy .hlCh
r.ountlel. cit' •• , and town. ~y requiTe, by ordinance, that now growth on4 de~el~nt
pAy I proportlonato ahare of tho COlt of nl. tlcl llt!nl needed to .arva new 9r~th al~
d.vele~nt; and
Icl To enellTII that tll!p.1Ct hel aro ''''POaed thro..<Jh enabllllhed proc~rel erld criterle
10 tllat apecUh: deVflloprlltnte do not. pey Arhitnry lelia or d""Ucatlve fC'Ca tor the
.. =0 Irpllct ,
III COuntlftl, cHic., and t~a tholt: are req'll'n~d or cltooa. to plen under 5101'
1'.10 •• 040 arc luthorlzed to Jerome 1mp.ct fe •• on dovelo~nt a c~J v'ty .1 part o f the
Un.n.chl1 tor public tocUit.lel. provided that the finandnq fOI' .yltC!:l l"'f1rOVt:Dlmll
to larve nev dovolDpl'lent _at provldo tor e ba'.nco bet_en I~ct h :'" lind oLher
lourcel of public fllndl and cannot roly 101111) on i~tt teeo .
tll The l~pAct feea,
to' 61u1l! only be I=pond for SyUOD leprovf!lI>f:ntl that orll! r.o.QIl.oIbly rcillud to lh~
nev devel~nt,
Ibl ~hall not cocced a proportlonlltl .hare of the Cb.t. or .yat~~ lrprove~ntl thot
18 .ro re.lonobly rellted to tho new devel~nt l and
" ,.
"
"
Icl Sh.ll be ulld for .y.tca u:prover.anl' ttlllt will rro.on.'l.h ly benefit th~ nrY
develop:.ent .
(4) l~ct teee may be eollected an6 .pent only t o r the public tacilltte. defined In
lCW .',0'.0'0 Vhlch are addeel'ed by a capital facllit le. plln tle~nt ef I
cor,prehenalve l.nd uoe plan adoyted purlUGnl to the rrovl,lon. ot lew ",10A.o,e or
the peovl.tonl tor cgeprthenlive plan adoption contained in cha~ter )'.10, lS.£l. oe
'SA ," ~CW . After the date a county, city. or town 'I requlr~ t o adopt Ite
devllopmtnt ~ulatlonl under c~~pter ".10A lew, continued .utho ri~atlon to collect
and .,opend l~ct teel .hall be cont t~.,nt on tho county, city, or town ad opting or
r.vlllnD • c~reh.,nllve plan 1n cor~llanc~ with lew ".10A.010, and en th~ c apital
faciltti~. plan idrntl(ying, t., uetie1r"cln .t" public {Aclllt1". ee,..,I"9 ellllth,g devel o1!'"'nt and th .. =,unl by
~ICh tlli'tlng d~!iclencl~. will be ~llmlnlted within a rea'GnAbl~ p!rlod af tl=el
(bl Additional dt~r4. pl.ctd en ,.tltlng publIC facilltle. by new de~elopeent: and
lei Additional public [acUity h :provllillenu reqo..lrC'd tOo .e""" new df:vOllo~nt .
U tI,. C"'lllul facilities fllan of the county. 1:11),. or to"il it caqll~te other thlon (or
Ihe inclu.ion of tl\.O toe eiellltntl od,lCh an the rcIlPOfl,lbili.IY of • lpedal dl.trlct,
Iud P,<,hc.bM
:1"" .... II;,;"·S' . ... ,tton, w-.. he ... ,
•
{ ''"-_ •..•.. , .. ---~ .. -• WI'" J41 --I ' •
L
• •
,.
, ,
.'
.,
' .
• • •
,
. ,
• ,
,
"
, .
l'
"
..
•
•
,
-. .
•
~, .
" .. -
•
-
I
j
J
1
'1
j
'j
, ..
"
"
..
'. he -
,:.'
, •
..
,
;':-,',
..
..
, • •
>i"
•
'~ -
..
I
I t
,
...
'1;"-"
L..
..
c'
..
1
,
,
•
•
•
-•
•
•
lO
11
"
1l
"
15
"
"
"
" , .
"
~2
" ,.
"
>
[
..
..
tho ~cunty. cley. or town ~y i~~. l~ct te •• to .4dT~" tho •• public t.(:111ly
n~d. tor wh~ch the county, city. or town 1. rb.pon.tbl,.
11'" c 1~' S l.: 1") .p .•• c ~ 5 ,. 1"0 I.t e •.•• C l' S .3 .)
NotO'1
S.¥~r.bility··l". c J57. $ •• not. tul1~i~J Rew ),,70A .270.
£tt~tl~ ~t"-l'" .p .•. e " See net. foll~ing Rew l&,7DA .O.O.
S.v.c~bilit1·~P.Tt ••• etlca 1'10'01"9' not 1,w ~'1'90 l.t 'X.I. c 171 ~e. Rew '6.10A.'CD
;a~ ". 'OA., ,01.
SEPA l 2CW 'l .JtC .D'~.
Mew ':.Ol .O'OI~~ct t ••• ··Loc.l orrtln4nc •• ·.R.qulr~ provlI1on ••
Th~ l oc.l ordinanc. by whiCh i~ct t •••• T, i~ •• d ;
I t) .5h.il in('h.dlL' .c hedule 01 ilP.JUoct re •• which al'l.lI be • .sopeed tor eAch type of
d.v.l~~[ .c tivity t~t 1. 'Ubj~l to l~ct t •••• lpecifying tho a-ount ol tno
lllpolc:t r ... t o ~ J :tIpOeed tor o;t,eh t)'fle of ')"UIl 'sprove_nr. The len.dllle Ind1 ~
ba,~ lipan ~ to~l. or ott.er method of c.leul.tin~ olich i_pacr , •••. In det.~in'"9
proportionate Ih.I.re. tho ton-ula or othor _tbod ot c.-JP!latln'J l~c.t t •••• ~11
lncorpor~t •• ~ng othor thing •• the fol1owlr~,
Cal Tho ~.t ot ~lte 'ac illtlel necea,it.-ted by new d4vcl~nt l
Ib) An ad'lIlt-unt to the COlt 0' the public tlc.ilitt'l tor ~.t or future ~ymentl
..de or rala~bly anticipated to be ~d. by new develcp=ent to pay tor ~rtlc.ul.r
.ylt~ i~roY~nto in rha for. of IIllr {ell. debt .ervlc. ~y=entl. tlxel. or other
p.-y.cnt ••• ~rk~ tor or pror~t&bl. to tho pertleular IYlte. '~rov.~ntl
lei 'Ill .. I\'&il~nity ot othu •• "nl ot (IincUng p.lbllc fodlity lq>rovt"entll
Id) Th. co-t ot •• 1Itln~ public (ac111tio. j.prove~ntll and
eel The eetbodl by ~lch public laci11t1.0 l~rove=ent. Wftre tln.need j
121 Kly p~ide An •• emption tor low-in~ hau.ing . an~ othlr dev.l~r.t Ic.tivitie.
with brood publ le ~rpo.e •• fro. th.l. i~c t fec •• provided thlt thl i~c t tee. lor
l uth Cevllopsent activi ty I~ll be paid fro. public fundi othar th~n iC1~Ct fe~
jOc.C"CUr.~ .~
III Stall f't"OVid.1 • credit l or the " .. lul of any dedicltion o f land tor. i .~provelllent
to. o ~ no~ ccn.truc~ion ot .. ny IYltt. JaproYe~ntl provided by th' developer. to
f*cll 1tlee thole .re ldentlfJed in the capital II:illti.o plan and that Ire required by
~he, COllntv. city. C~ tOoo'n .~ • cc.n.dltien of IFJ1rovl n9 tho develOptDlnt IctivitYl
t 4l Shill allow the cou nty. city. or town i~.ing tho i_poc.t feea to .djulL the
Itln41rd. i~c~ fee .t the tlEe the tee il ir.po.ed to can. ida' unulual circuc.taneel
.i n Ipt::1!.\C Clle' co enilire thot i"'ll"ct fe.1 .re il':pOled feirlYI
(51 ~h.all include a provilion for cllcu1lt1ft9 Lhe I~nt o! tho fee to be i~po •• d on •
partlcul~r d.evelop.ent thlt ~rDJtl conl l dor4tion ot Itud.i e. and ~tl I~itted by the
~velcper to .. dju.t the O.o\lnt of the teel
15) ~11 IIt.ablil~ one or lare rellonable .ervice ar ••• within .hleh it Ih.ll
c.lculate and lapela l~PlCt teel (or vlrlOli' lind lIee categorie. per unit of
d evelup!l!llnt :
III ~y provl~ tor the i~llticn of In l"~ct feo tor IV.te~ ir.prove~nt COltl
prevl Q\1 11y inellrred by • cOIIn tv. city. or town to the e~tent t~t new growth Ind
Oevel~nt vill be .~rved by the previoully c onatructed i~rove~nt. provided ali eh
!ee sh~11 not be IDpO._d to =axe lip t or any ay.tem i~proyement d.[iciencie ••
U,,,, lit ....... c 17 S .4 .J
lIetes ,
Severab ilit y·-Plrt. lection heading. not 1 •• ·-1"0 1.t ...... c l~, See ROW J'.~OA .'OO
and ll .~GA .'01.
II Ex.'1ibit S .lA, 5 .18
Pe~!tt~er 2r#pon:e brief -It
, .'
'r.d llIcllohon
lJDO H.C.:"". _en lan, w •. "o~,
..
..
• . ':-,
.>;
•
•
,
..
,
..
..
.' .. ,
.. ..
..
-LJ : :
,,,
•
• • ,
.
jO ~.;-~.
~.. ' ._.
, ~ ";-..
','. fl. 'I " .. •
•
. '
•
..
•
)
,
,
•
,
• . '
~'---__ .... :Xfti Wi 11 .. __ • t. I •
1 The ordinance apl1li\!d According to DEl''' cln be utilhc:d to i~poac teeD only
, for Imr.olct.s thllt .ro direct. IIpeeHlclIlIy related to the I'rojccta, an:l , ni!Jnitlc""t," :iII"!. !D nUllpletrlentary. to elChtlnq lawn.
4 MY Amttndl'l!ent IIIUDt COOOI)ly with the act .nd the regulaLibnD "'Ylt. be conoliltent
, with and IInplement the compnlhenoJve: phn, lind they (Ire aubJect to continuou.
, review lind evaluatIon." City i!jno"rca the relevllnt Dlletlona of the: erp. Tho
, public hAa an cDDDntJ~l and critlc.t role In carrying out the provi.iona of
•
u RCW U.:UC.060
, let Ion.
10
11
))
"
"
17
18
"
'0
"
"
ThE pglSclel .nd ~oala lat forth in thl. chapter are .upple~nt.ry to tho •• Gilt forth
in exl.tJ~ authorJ:atJon. of all branche. of 90Ycrnsont of thl. Itall, includi"?
.t.t~ .~on~I~ •• ~nlcl~1 and public corporatlonl. and countiel. Any gover~nlll
a~tlon ~y be ~ondltloned or denied purlu.nt to thia c~pter l rROVID~. l1~t luch
conditione or denlah lfull) be baud uJ'IOII l>olIdel identHled by tllo .ppropriate
!loYflrn:acntli 4IIuthority and Intorporatod Into r"'9ulltlonl. phn •• or cod ... \oO"i~h ato
101'1Nl1ly dul!ln.ted by tho .!Jeney for approprht" 1t"Cjlohtiva body. In the e.u' of
locI 1 90yern-.enl) 10 pollibhl burl tor lha ClIlISJclae of Iluthodty JI\Inu.llt to thll
chapter. !Oueh de.lgnulon DlllIoll ocC1.lr at the tl_' apecUICld by MCW n.:lIC.1l0. !Ouch
.etlon ~y be conditioned only to altl9~tfl .~iflc .dyorDfl onYlr~nt.l l~ctl
which .ro Identified in the envlton.ent.1 d~nt. preparod under thil chapter. Th •• e
Condition. 1n.11 be Itated In wrltlll9 I~ tho decl.lor~kcr . Mitigation ~.suro. shill
be rO.lon.bl •• nd c.pable of being .ccoeplilhed. In ordor to deny a propo .. 1 under
thl. ch.ptor. lin lI!Jflncy Wilt find th.t, 111 Tho propolal _ld ro.ult In .'9nltle.nt
Idvor.o I~~ctl Identlflfld In " Clnal or lupplOEental on\lronaontal J~ct .latfl~nt
pnpilrod under thh chaptorJ find 121 r"l.on.l.Il", IIIJttg"'tion .. ..e.a"r". are lnll:utficlent
to aillgiltll the idl!ntiCied i=pllCL . £lCCl!pt for ,'flRlitll lind var.\"nCIIII IIlued pureulnt to
c~pter '0.51 RCW. vhon luclI a goverr.w~ntal action. not rflqulrlng a l~I~I.tlve
decl.ion. 't condltlonfld or denl.d by a nonelectod Ott'clAI of a loe.l govern=ental
a~.ney. thfl decilion Ih"ll be appe.lable to the l~I.\lItiv. iI~thority of the ilctill9
loc.l governzentill .gency unlo •• thilt le9'lliltlve authority fo~lly clieinatcl I~th
appe.l •. Sueh appe.ll eh,,}} be In accordance with procedurel elltablilhed for IIYch
,,~.h by thll legill"tlvo iluU,ority or the ilctintJ local govermr.cM.lI1 _!Jeney.
1191) c tl1 Ii lJ un ex.l . C '11 S 'J tnt OIt.D . c 109 S C.I
MCW 4).21C.O'S l~paCt foee and leel tor Iylte~ Improve~nt •.
A perlon requln_d to PIlI' an h:p.ct teo tor ay.ter. hr.provetl>ent. Jl\lrluant to ROI
I'.O,.QSO thrO\l9h 1).02 .090 Ihall not be required to PilY a feo pur.uant to RCW
4).'lC.0'0 for thoall .aao .y.tee l~rDY~nt'.
" RC"II l6. 101..110 Coe:prehenllve planl--lIevl.w--A:!;cnd-""f:ntt-.
lilia' Elich eocr.rrflhen.h·c land UIC phn lind develcprr.cnt rCiJulatlon. ahaU ~ luhjoct
to continuing review and eYalultion by the county or city lNll ndQJIlt!d thelll.
~4 Ibl Any lI~n~~nt ot or revilton to a cccprehcnlivc land uae plan chall contor. to
thil chaptflr. Any .mcn~~nt ot or rov1.10n to deycle~nt r~ulallcnl Ih~11 ~
:15 cen.httnt with arm h'.plH>tlnt the coo-prehtnllve plan.
P~tltlQn~r RecpcnDc brjce • :I~ B,·,11 NldMlhcn
.HCO 11.1:. U·SI .
_tnlGO. w~. "C"
'[1 -=-'"-~ '.--.----..,--~~.-.... ,-.... -.,-~.
, .
., ,
,
"
~ .,
• , • ,
•
, ,
•
,
'. ,
-
.. ,
'.
!
,
•
•
I
I
• •
,
•
,
•
-
•
,
" ,
,
1
•
•
•
,
~ r '",-'fC
. ,
"".~ -' -"' .. -~.'! -,.I :~
There 1. no doubt that they mUle include tho Belt AVAilable Science tnto the
the B •• t rec~ndAtlon and ~hat ettect the plane .1ght have upon the
5 4Inviron",nt if the 'rccOiUiiendationa contained vithin their atatementll arc not
Ii iu:plitlllented. U
,
• ,
10
II
!l
"
••
lS
"
Further a,ientl!ie evidence and advice i. nceded. The Pugct Sound Plan
outlined further In the folleving pagel of thie [Copanel, Ind the City ~It
l~plc~nt tbole development regulationl that arc an ceDent ill part of that
plan and alIa, a. viII be exp141ned later, an important part of their own
Poliey."
., A~ J6.70A.l40 COftpr~hcn.iv. plana··Enlurl public portlclpatlon.
£arh cour.ty and city th~t il ,.quited or eboole. to plAn under RCW )~.'OA .040 .t~l\
.It.bll.~ Ind broadly di •• e.lnAt~ to tbe public I public participation progr~Q
l ~entltyl~ p~edurea provldlnq ror early Ind contlnuoua public par:lclp.:lon In the
developoent Ind ~n~nt o~ c~rehenalv~ lInd UI~ plana Ind d.vol~nt r~l.tlonn
Inpl ... ntl09 .uch pl.ro •.
"RCW 1'.7C!A .171 ~C"'l ?o.eI<;JlIAtlon .lid protectlcn··Beat .v~lhbll! .Clenee
to be u"d. -~
til In dellgnatlng .nd protecting critical III •• under tbl. chapter. countle' .nd
citi e. ahall include thl be.: .v.ilable Iclence In developing pollcle. and developaont
r~lltiar.1 to protect the function. and value. of crltic.l .r •••• In Iddltlon •
~O countiel .nd cltl ••• ~ll give .peel",l conllderatlon to contervltl cn or protection
.... ur •• necea~ry to pr •• erve or enhance .nadrODOU' tleherlea.
11 Il) It i t d.terslnea thlt advice fro. .ci.ntl~lc or othlr .~pert. I, nec.ltary or will
be o f tu~tt.n:lal ••• lltaoce In re.c hir~ It. deci,ion, I 9t~h ~nl9enent ho.rir~1
~l board ~y ret. in .eien:1fte or etbor eapert .dvice to ••• l.t 1n teviewing a petition
under RCW l'.70A ."O tr~t involve. critic.l .ro •••
"
:!4: "RCW )I .')'OA .210 C:cunty·wi de plannin!] poliet ....
n l Tho legi .l.liture roc09nhel :hllt CO\IIU iea .ro regJN'lAl government" within thlnr
2S bour~r l •• , ~nd cit Ie. ar. prl~ry provider. ot urban 90vern~ntAl a.rYlce. ~itbln
~rn.n 9~th .r~... Fo r th" purpo.e. or thi. aettlcn, I ·c ounty·wide planning poliCY·
J, • written policy At.t~ot or It.te=cnt. uleO Iclely tor e.tA~li.h1n9 I county·wl de
,
•
'. ,
&Iud NldlOhon
;'lOOIl.C.Z"St. '_"ton , W.. "OJ'
, .
"
. .
..
,
,
,
-
, , ,
, .
, ".
•
\
,
J
•
5
,
, ,
• ,
10
11
"
1)
" ,
, 15
"
"
18
"
" i 20
21
"
21
"
,
,
"
~' .\ ~ -------
o
It G~f:1MI I. though it IIl10uId be clear to all concorned t.hat tho CWA
lIC1rvell lUI the :'!t01lt. uaetul provialon to c::::notruo and ct'tectulotc the tecllla of
SEPA ~nd the CHA,4' conat.teney with the CPP to II ~UGt.
The Countywide Planning Paltry 1. very clear and un.~19uoU. ~~n It. C~. to
Water OU11itv(!j And IIho when It CorneD to prot.f!cting the very valuable
rCDourc:e o( S.l~n and water qu.ltt~ThOOe rCDourc:oa Irc veoy neee.clry tor
framework from Which county Ind city c:o.prehenlive plan. Iro davcloped and adopted
pur.ulnt to Lhll1 c:~pter. Thl. rrl ~work ahalt ~n.ur. th.t eity Ind county
C:2!rr~hftn.iye plana .re conal.tent •• tPqutrpd in RCW l'.'OA .I00.
1
" ~~O .".Ol roller enuneillcd.
It I ~el.r to be the public polley of the It.tO of w,lhlngton to .. inta:n tho
high fble Itand4rd. to Inlure the purity of III watera of the otato eon.lltent
with public he.lth .nd public enl~nt thereot, the pro~gatlon .nd protection ot
wild lif., bird., 9.&0, floh and Other aqu.tlc lita, and the lnduatrlal deve)op$ent of
the .tata. and to that end requito tho u •• at .11 known .vall.ble and re •• anable
Mthod. by 1ndu.trJo. and otllan to provent an4 !:ontrol tho pollution at ttle waten ot
tho .tato ot W~lhlngtan . COnalatent with thla policy, tho atato ot w4.hl"9ton will
exorelle It I power., 10 fully and a. affectlvely .1 pDollble, to rotlln and 'ocur.
high qu,llty for all water. of the It.tO . Tho otate of W~'hlngton In rac09nltion of
the foderal 90vornv~nt'l intero.t In tho quality ot tho n.vlg,bla wat.r. or the United
State., ot which cert.ln portion. ther.of .re within tho )url.dlctional 11.lt. of thl •
• t.to, proclal~o I public policy of w~rklng cooper.tlvlly with the f~.r41 ~~nt
in I ,oint effort to .xtlr.gul.h till .ource. of .. ater quality de<Jr.~tlcm • .mUll' It thl' .... ,1_ prfllCrving .nd vl!JorO\lI)V eXflrchi ~~) .tIU, J'IOWCn to 1nlure that pr.l.nt Ind
future It.n4ard. of water ~J4)lty wlthtn the flt.te ahall be deto~ine4 by the
cltl •• nry, through .n~ by the efforta of ,tate goverr~n~, of t~ It.le ot w •• hi ngton .
., o . Air Ind Water ~aUty (CPP)
CA.-IS All jUrl,dlctionl .holl l~le~nt the rug,t Scund Water aullity H4na9~nt Plan
to re.tore Ind protect tho blalO!Jlc.1 heAlth .nd dlveraity ot tho Pug.t SOund D4.ln.
It CA.' II.turll dr.lln.ge aYltt1ll.. including allochted riJ'll'rhn .nd lhorei£ne hablut
.hall be e.lntainoa and enhanced to protll'ct Wlter qu.llty. reduce public CO.II,
protlct Cllh and wlldlile h.bitlt, Ind prevent enviro~Dtll dC9r.~tlon .
J'urh4lctlonl within lluirod ~ain •• hall coordlrau regullUon. to Bln.ge bI.inl and
natur.l dr.lnage ly't~1 which Include p~i.lcn. ,.,
I, Protect the natuTal hydraulic Ind ecologlc.l functlono ot dr,lnlg' .y.te ...
Nfntaln and enhanco fllh and .. Udlifo h.bltat. find reAlare and Blintain tho .. nAtural
functlona ,
b. COntrol pea); runoff rato .n4 qulntity of diachu9U fr~ no ... da"l~nt to
approx l~te pre-deyelo~nt r.tel, .nd
c . pr.aorv. and prntoct re.curce. Ind beneficial tunetlcn •• nd v.lue. throush
~Inten.nee of Itabl. channol., .dt~Jate low flowa, ~nd reduc tion of future .tona
tl~:. ero.ion, and 'I'dl~nt.tlon.
~tJIJoner RecpcnDe brJef • ~4 11,..;1 1l.,,:.;,J..-.
.UOI" r:.;,'&t .
1I~.It"". ...... ,'OJt'
" ........... , ....... ,., " III ..
L , ,
,', '. ,
,
. . ,
'. •
'.
,
,
,
• ,~
" ..
,
,
f
f ~; ; .... : . . , , ,
.'
'.
I
I
!
, ,
,~ ".,
. -:, ,
.. '
: ;
"
,
"
• .-
"
• •
, ,
•
,
1 qu,t.li~y of. life lind economic developlllenc." All of thallo I114tt01"1I IIrc very much
l liIubjecc t.o boolrd review."
,
•
5
• ,
•
• ,.
11
12
And ~n order Q~ould en3ue accordingly."
• 1 2. I:I\viren.unt lcprl
EU.I0 Juri.diction' .~ll adopt econ~ic d~velopeent lind ocher policies whi ch will
r.cogn ize and help protect the environ.enl II /I key economic value In the r~lon .
LOCal polieie' lhall •• ek to Ichieve lin ~ppropri'l. balance between tho n •• da for
ccof\.olll.lc 9fOWl.h .rId thlll need tor pr-ocecling the II'nvironl'lloCnt. 1.0<:0\ goverr_MII lice eneour~ed l ~ look tor w.y. to -ork cooperatively with ~.lne •• e. to help them co=ply
with .nvir~nt.l r~l.tion. and to develop policiol that re.ull. in enYJro~nt.l
protettlon thrQUgh 'ttt<Jul.tory procc .. e. ciullo .n un:ieuundable and efficient.
•• RC"f )'.70A_210 ":totter. aubjecl to board rovlll ....
III " gf'OWtb IUnaqlllftlllnt. hrllringl bo.\rd Ihlln IllIr lUllS dottlnlil'lo only tholo rethlcn.
alle~lng either, I~I ~l • Itolc agency. county. or City rlAnnl~ under th'. Chapter la not i n
ecr.plunc" lIith the l'e'l\lircllwI1'IU of this clUlptcr. eh_pter 90.58 RCW I'll it ,dlltel to
the adoption ot ,horeline ~at.,r prP9rll~. or a.en~nt. thereto, or c:h,pte, 41 .2~~ MCW
13 a. It relAte. to pll'ln., dov()!opr.oent rr<Julatlona. or o~nflr.l'.lnto, adarted un:lllr kCW
15 .. !lCW U. 'fOA .lOO
111 The board IIhall
Fln.)1 orden.
ha\lo. a tlnal order th.)t ah.n be b41"" "u,clun!vc1y on ... hdher or
16 not a Itate I'Igeney. county. or city ia 1n c~ltance with th~ roqulre~nta of tnl.
c~~pttlr, cnapter '0 .51 RCW as It relatea to adoption or a~ndeent of ahorallne e~ster
17 progra~. or chapter 4J .21C RCW s. it relate. to IIdcption ot plano, dcvrlopsent
l.t'<)\I.laticn •• and .~rujt:.o:nta uerelo, \lnda r Rot l'.'fnA .D40 or chapter 90.58 RCW .
Illtal Except as pr.>Yidcd In tb) of this aubaectlon. the final order Ihsll be iOlued
... nhtn Cl(ie hllMred ,d9hty w.ys of receipt of thfl petition tor rovll1", or, 1f c:ultlplc "
petition. are tiled, vlt.hln one hu~red .Ighty day~ of recflipt ot the la.t pctlt10n
t~At 10 con.olidated •
20 1b} n.c llo.lrd ;MY extend th .. period or tir.llll for hluir.g 1'1 "echicn to enllble the
~rtle. to .ettle the dispute it ad41tlcnat tice t. neceooaty to .chieve D settle:~nt.
:1 .nd 11t an 'lI.~en.lcnl i. r~queoted by .11 ptrtie •• or Itl) en e~t.noion i. roque.ted by
the petitionflr .nd re.pondent and the board detflrntne' that a n~otiatod sfttl~n~
bet~.n the re:~ini"9 parties could reoalv. s19nif1cllnt iosu~~ in dlopute. The request
~'t be riled ... Ith the board not later than .even d.lY. betore the ~te ae:hedulcd lor
the heari"9 on the merits of the petiticn . The board may Authori:e cne or ~re
exteno lons fer up to. ninety d.lya cach. Dubject to. the requirementD ef thiG
Jlectien.
"
"
L
III In the Un"l order, the bollrd ahall either :
(a) piud that t.he GtAte "gency, county. er city iss In compliance with t.ho
requh'ell'.ents of [hie: chilpter, chapter 90 .58 RCW aa it reht.ell to. the edopticn
or AlI!Cn~IU a ! Ih.oro:llllo lM.ter I'rO<)u .... or Chapter 4J .llC kCW .n it relltell lO
PetitJoner Respor.3e brief · 25
,., ...
ar .. d tIlchuhCl'
':Jac 11.1:.':"$1 •
•• nlon. ~... ~.c,(
..
•
,
,
"
,
•
•
•
". '
I •
I " ' ; ,
"
J
•
•
•
, ,
•
.-1 '
".
• ,
,
•
'.
"
•
..
•
L: '.
"
LL'~ , .' . , >' ,', ,,"'
'::" t'
"
1
,
l
,
,
,
,
•
•
10
11
"
11
••
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,.
, '
.', .-
, .
,
-.
, ,
, ,
-_ .. _-
a!SOptton of pll1nl, develope<lnt fe<;l,,\atio.n •• And aaendlN-nlll t.1I"1"l.0.. un:! .. '! FCW
)'.10".040. or cll:optf!r 'O .!il MC'W I or
Ib) rind that the Illlte _!Jeney. county, or city i. not .If' coc:pl i.u.e e Io'\.t.h tIle
re'f\l!rl'_ntl o f t.nlA ct;apler. ch;t(ller '0 ..... II.C'W •• it le\Dtt:'1 t.o tone .d.Qplion o r
lI~n~nt o r .horeline ~lIl~r Jlrogr.~ •. or chll~ler 4).21C RCW •• it rol~te5 t o.
adoption of phn •• ul:vc\or"""I'nt n t,)ulalionl •• n.d A~nd_nl. lhe,UO. UIICI .. l I\t::'Io(
36.10.1\,040 or Chlll"t.oer lie .!,' RCW. In .. !IIel! CIUI" the bofIr4 .hal1 , .. ~I\d the ""H.ur to.
the "rreeled IIlatl' 119cncy. count)', or city. Tha ~rd Dhall Ip"'City. ,,,.'POIu,ble ti...",.
IICt In CI~ce .. o.f one h\.lndr.1I ti!:lhly tla),a. or flllcn 10fl<)ltT Jl('riod IU O"l'tef"<ll\~ by th ..
~rd in ("IIIU:!. 0 1 unllllu.l .tOre UJ" cooepledtV. vith1n vhl c h the ntllte IIgcl1C)', ("O\Inty,
or city ahllll CO'l'i'ly v ith I,he n~(f"lrC1!)Cl nttl ot thU cll~i'tllr , Ttl," bo.1orc1 NY lequire
ptlrloc1tc ,flporlll 1..0 thl! bollrd on the l1rt>9reu th~ lul"iIlc1lcUal\ 1a """,'un') ttno'4rt1'
:l~. CQrI"I.llant::fI t
retJtJoner ~eapan ~e brief -~,
' ' , .... -
,
, •
. ,
--_~,.--.~, ...... P-· --
.I~ r; •• 'I>oJo(::<l
.:'Jnc II c "u 'n, ,. .. " ........ ". 'f:~4
, 4 •
.'
•
•
•
, ,
'.
•
,
,
" ,-
•
.,
, , ,
,
,
'.
,
I
I
J
L
rl.' '
.' J'
" ,
,
"' ..... ~ . . " ..
,
,
1 v.
:z 5.1 All o[ the Cactual allegations conlAined the Petition [or Jh:vlew o'Ire true
1 ~u".d undhputed. and Reupondcnt lind Intflr'o'cner .... are uno'lble to conve~t any ot
4 tholl" (.leta. They did not: rupend to the Petition tor Review.
5 All of the factual IMterh.1 In the 1'1:1::; lett.C!1" number thirteen in
6 .~d correct. They were undiaputed and incontrovertible.
7 Proponent. Intervener. Hcaring RxamlneT, and City Rcapondent cite ~udicl41
IS interpretat.iona oC Law Creely, but i9nore Judicial Intcrprctntiono concernJn!)
') spot ::onJng .and adequately prcllcn:ing decl:lion mlIkerc w.\[h II diDcloGUTC of
10 the probable :lignific::anc lind advene Dodd. eC'onOlllic, lind ot.her
11 conoequeneeo (:r.~ng ot.hern). 110 citat.lona or LA." or argument concorning
12 t.hoae, and other lcaue.ll w.J.c included Into t.he record, eytrn ltrter Petitioner
lJ thlC!ly ra 1 rlC!d those illl:luea. l!e~rin9 £)!.r.lincr ordered clCclu.cion or
,. oupplr!M!ntoUy dillC'ullaicn ot Goeinl And economic conaequencelJ in violation ot
15 la'of,"
" .C'~. ,. Wn.2~ S". U7 P.2d 1)77 11,141 , dadllon
11
" 111 Hi) nqulre thott lin tIS dhclole tho onvironzentG}
~~voi~ble adver.e envlro~ntal ettecr. of the
" that tt.e .tate·. intended policy 1. to •
lO
RC"If .l.nC.Clotll tel • .,lth .pprova1f See allo cot ... , TtIE 1U:Q\jIRtHcrt rOR IJI IHrAC'T
21 STM£)(DlT: A ~£O f'IlAHCWORJ: FOR A.'1.\1.1~IS •• , Wuh, ... Rev . 9>9. 'S7 11".) Cited,
"
"
cit S41 P ,2d '" tJd Cic. 19161 ;~:;i~~!i~,~'~ core cllueed incre •• ed cDl!I"..utlM. 10111 ot and $eying to aubur~., le"dl~ to eeonoaic
downtown deterioration. downturn •• nd downt~ ablndor~nt. all t.ctoro
to urban dee~y, city degradation, lOll ot envlro~ental quality. and
ightl .
reder.l ~~ldelinel tor tIS preparAtion .tato ele.rly that .~cond"ry or IrAlrect
Includlng c;hII"'le~ pattern_ of aoelal and eccnonic activitleD.
..!:~~~!:': ':'holt J. al_o cX,1.ctly the II.::.c type ot
II: nq'~ired here . C1ti~. 40 C.t'.R. I~OO .l{.'IIl) lUI .
"ud IIIC':: .. 1.O#> n o" ,.'.1:.1I'$!.
""II~"'" 100' .. , ""if
•
L
..;tic: -",.-, ......... ,.~' ... :._1 ......... ~.~-~,--
,
..
,
. ,
,
" ,
'"
.
, .. ~.
• "
-
•
•
• •
'.
· '. •
•
I
•
J
•
•
,
I ,
l
j
•
5
,
,
• ,
10
Il
"
"
15
"
"
..
'0
"
"
"
"
• •
"
•
•• •
o
...."" A,bJtr'al'y /lind c:"prJcJ oul lind clelrly erroneoUIi . All of the filets
ellenlod .... hll the: IIIOtion and brief beta .. '! lhc City !leering ExalflJnr.r .. cre
110 true lind uncontroverted ."
s ... The City hAG nov chllnged Lhe economIc developlIM:nl elemeht In Gu c:h 4
Thull WAC 1",11 and tho ... lIcol1ar C(NnLelllroduC;llve Asaeltiool • .r,d c;ounte~ct .. cited
_hconltNwor Incand.tent "Ilh SErA IlOl iet" •• c:1l1119. RCV .u.2 1C.C20 Ul lc:j.
·B_C.u •• t h.ir ru l .~ can f lict v ito lap", polier lh_y .r . !e •• lld',
" w,1.;td In. 371. !.u ".'d !o!:.O lin". ""'D.ItU:7$b co. "'.
" No .ld )10, J14, !on f.ld S 11"" U wn.::d .n
~:::~,:,:;rcrponl!'nl evidently 4rgU.,,, th4t the tiS .... not I'f'quln:d to odd~ •• 1«1.1 and
c l~c:t •• and it evldcn~ly c l~i.a l~t ~tt~'on. a. to th. seor~ o t th~ £1$
nOl apPlloh,ble under HAC 197.11'''01))1_,111).
Aa 1n App . Ill, !l~O J'.Jd 1207 "'here COOJrt
I'jnt, the IICoplll<J no t 1I". .. "lt\? other topico.
"/l qllO)T.ent, laM UII(! p.otterna , tun.porur.l un, An:! cccJ'!lI.m:e .. Jt.h :OEr;. .nc! CJV..
Thoae =lll:lClntJl encca-p.t." t.he _ocl,,} .lim: e COf\Qr.\lc (.'ltf'ct lJflCh' lllO c ity . S4'cCf'ldl y .
that WAC .PJ'IUO' to appelile wlt.h!n an acblinlnuth'lII "''JIIIICY . I 11111 n:"q-,Ieeul\'J tNt
lpeelfic Incorporo:ltton under IoIAC !97·II -U O IJI.
It it wero othervioe , our ago:nqi o Ul cHIl. could ,.r .. clude r('VioW" ot 41n £IS
by UDltl~ It.a OCopC', Dud that 1ft a1ao hhtant.ly contr ... ry t o tl,e
of tePA. That 111 ~xllctl y wl~t has occur l~d here . W~ 1'7'll -£COIJJ Ibl
that /I ~upple='nt.l RIS i. rf'qulr ~ If there a r~ lJlt~or. all] r.ubeLllntl.1
to II proposal DO th:lt the proPQul h lH.r:ly t.(> I"""c ugnUicallt advf'ut!
lltpactllJ wh i ch 111 _1.0 aWl ic .. ble here, or, [::1 lie .... Inforr.:I,,"
In11cattng -propoa"l'. probobl~ significant. ~dvnrJ~ ~nv1~~LAl t~Ct.s I.
",Tht. Ine :ud~. dt.cov~ry of Ml.r~rrtsent_tton or l.ck ot t.ctual ~teri"l
h)' , O~IB I "'l
po"tb1
Se.,
c.C'luDively
or IOllt
r.2d '6], ", IO .C.
t't . ,n IInl].
l:.och!blt nulrllM!r ]
0"
:14 1O'n .'11 '0. H. "S r .2d U 1 IUtel :
ArP. lJ', I &S, '70 P .Jd lC'~. r~v lcv e~njc~,
th~ JC~C'l. 0 ' the proponent
produt'tl"lly •• nd output,
the l:1!l o\'e rl oo~D thD
Jnt'~ lind b.l8~.
r ota}
~
tlu.J "·'thoJ.~ I 41" H.I' • .:!,'n .
•
, '
~--•••••• , •• -------_, •• ~ <0, ,_~# • r.n ~~, ~A~ ••••. '.,' .................... ~ ........ I------'
.. • · .;. · , -
•
L
•
;
•
-
,
"
•
•
,
"
,
.,
,
" ,.
,
. '
,
•
-"
,
"
•
I
1
I
L
,
•
,
, ,.
..... ~.~
~ . .,., ~h.
~~ •... ,.:'-,~,..,--.--.'-........ : ...
,
.,'
'.' '-J .'::> ..... " "£", '
• ... .:."''" .,. ___ ,,_~ .. _.' '<l"",~",u __ .,,,,",-,-
.~ -
, ~r.n.r 10 •• to be Inc:onelltent with the countywide planning polley. aa well , ~. the GMA And SEV~. It they tol1~~ proper procedure and enCourAge
) ~nuf£ccurln9 ~nd induacry on ~he olce according to cueh plana, the land une
•
5
• ,
• ,
t6
10
"
"
ele~nt ~ld become tneonalatent ~ith applicable law •. They now purport to
dlacour~ge induatri.l and ~nufActurin9 activity on aite.
S.S City ordinance c~tts to inplementing l~act [ec ordinAnce in accordance
s.' city repreacntative ~greed to carry out the countywide Planning policle8
and participated in tholo praecoces. \I
5 .1 City representatl'l:e 11: no~ ~yor. and knoYli that .U 119rced to carry out
Fuset sound pl~n to protect water quality . City o[ Renton policy to protect
Sal=onid apecleD etated Ito policy to carry out th~t plan.)!
" WIoC )'5_1.95_105 Slide ...... =:pt.lon •. 01 WlI~" tht! le-gillatlu:e hal Ipc'o,;en ~l<prClldy on the reladon.hip at th" IIct to other
atatutory prgvl.Jonl, thll explicit lC9111ative directions ahall be e~rried out .
Example. of ~ch IIl<pre •• provl.ion. are .111 forth in WAC ],5-1'5-150 , I~I Ab,ent • clear st.te~nt 01 l~i.l.t£VII intenl or Ju~lcl.1 interpretlltion to ttl"
cantll'sry, it ahould be pre.u~d tll.n . neither the .c:t nor othllt lIt-atutel au Intl:ndcd
to be preecptivil. ~LhIlT they _hautd be conslderld together lind. ~hllrllver poillible.
c~n.trued a. ftUt~lly eonai,tent.
u ClQIot1'JI JCJJt,\CDPJIT .u.Hrf:)tO CQ'JNCIL kEKJI"'·
IUt 'ro50011 ull I:iog ~ty.
1!0fI StU. ICing County Lxecut!·le. cn:dr
J~ Kag~e. ~~Jl~~r
Pavia lror.a. cOWKll_::mr la'lteoutel r~thy ~~r:. council~~Der ,alternatel
JuU" Pattersen. cou."\cil~r
LArry ptlil1Jp', CO\Ir.c:U=e"'her
" cynthia Sulllv~n, ccunc11~~r
Pete vcr. Reie~~uer. oouncl1~r~r
Othec eiti •• aDd T~. i~ 1:1~ ~tr r~thy ~Qlk~r.Wh~ele~. council~~r, Clty of Renten
-
42 £xJ)lbl t S.' _~_'_' ,_,_'_'_._m __ ._'_'_._'_~
Ilr .. d Njd>ohcn
:JOO N.C.;"!::'
."nton. ~ ... "0"
•
-_.,-_. ------" .. i •• ~" •• , .. ~;.·.'.·.4.< ••• " •. , ....... ;~t_" __ .,~~.,-"".~J .... ~ ..... ·'·lS ........... ----··--',--...
,
•
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
"
/ , " ,I
>
•
,
•
•
'.
". :1-1,
\
,
1 ,
•
, • •
•
,
,
•
•
10
11
11
"
"
"
"
"
20
"
21
•
•
• • '.
l , •
. ,
•
-........ ' .. • ,
o
There h no relllon in the .record not LO .IItplcment the plan. City polio..iC'CI •• Y
they 10Iill ir:rplel:lant rcgulatlonll but,. they n~ will not. That 111 not
.. pecut.live, becnUDe it iD exactly what haD occurred.
5.8 In order Cor the DeDt Av~Jl.ble Dcience cequlra~nt to be implemented,
the DcientlCic rcaDcna tor not iII:pielDCnt 1 n9 the CPl' and tho PolJ cy f or the
protection oC Salmonid epecteD ~.t be included in the record. 1t haD not
been. They recommended the me.RUCCD but did not l~ple~~nt them.
5.9 Petitioner repeatedly requClatcd • rCII.on that the Ecology Hlnunt And beat
~n.!]ement practice a chould not be uDcd. ~ t no re •• on "aD ever Dupplied and
a. " INItlor of tact. the expert., lIdllllU.ed "pecllically that t.hcre ", •• no
relliion. ThOll: hi lnc.on.,htent ",Itll the CliP and !>GIIA .
S.10 The Proponent lntorvener, and City reopondent (.ould nbt COnVl'lrt the
facti Iletter 1) lIection 21 PEts' that an unjultltiable cxtcnnlon ot
privUcge lo'Ould be furthered by the optiono and alternativeD in queDt:ion.H
-------
n fJ:ID epecUlcally outline. the racta and ItltC', "It i. I'>Ot Ol all to ~al and
ablclute 1000lc. it 1. eur lupcrrlcnce •. nle felt nece •• itlea ot the public.
ethic.d anlj !nOrd deNndl of lIoc!al and CCOI\OalIC 1n.tltutlonll. on:! even th~
prejudice. th.llt we IIIlght Itare, thllt Gh.ould have II good dell IlIOn: to do with it
whln we .dapt to the cha"9ing ti~ In our hi GlOry
The cha09'1 thllt wo:!! .dopt. Ihould e~y the IItory or our aucc"a.rut and
pro.perou. dcv"lOp!llCnl thrCNgh tb",. and '-'11 clln not deal with It aa though it
conuin. Oflty ... ontl .Ided or ~rthl or lIub)ccrh'e concludon.
Wit ahould in thl attcnlate ConIU1t our cd.U09 1tonicg and our twIt acJcl)Cc. aM
whl1l1 peullvllrlng 1;0 cOlllblne the tvo )nto the Il\IbUc ule and !nterellt at ",""ry
turn. The .W1at.UCO of t.hil tlhould be what "to undeutond to bo: conv .. nhmt, tnlt;
the extent th.t we ore able to Achieve our 90<'111 omS cb}toctheo depend very lOUt'''
upon on our ob.erYance .nd con.truction o f ~ubllC polley.
COn.lduing tho broad fr.tDt ot ref('rC"nce al'..j the brood iq.,ll't of ttle propoul
upon the Cit)' .lonn .. !th iu ccephJt code 'ro:rUcatio.na. we cannot "Uow
red('vel~nt to ocC'Ur ... ithln tlUI context of cuch • broad range cf U'''I . J
beHeve thAt anyone c1then tlundll'l9 dellle, would aho like: to be allOOA.l'd to
develop tllelr laf":I with !lueh broad lc",,_, .. hi.le Ilnjoyln!) a broad a~d
dl.eret'on~ry rreC"dON.
It 11 ror thelle re •• on. thllt t null coat end that the ~rcpcntnt. h ~t unt ike
other propertlel, in our City lind r"9lon ",lid under identic-aI CUC'l,laltAnC'el . Ttlil
h the very e'ltlOCe of thlo 10t.tl\(',. and J believe t'IM the IIdopttld lIun-jard •
Ihould Apply beeoule the nature or the prcpo •• l lndlc.tel onl)' t~~1 an
pet1tioner Responne brie! -)0 IIr.d NU.'>oJ_
;OleO H.C :,'St .
'efltcn .• 4 , "II!'
'-r--~ "-:.-,...-
.. . ' ,
•
,
,
,
. .
,
•
• -.' -••
J • .,
I
•
"
, ,
•
,
•
-
•
,
,
, ..
•
t
~-.-'-' .-~
. .
.'
•
"
"
I o c •
•
1 5,11 City plana .and regll14tiena hllve no procedure Cor mitigation o[
: C\lmulaeive lrr;pac:ta.
1 5.12 Ciry J=Po\C't fee developmont rtgulationa v10late Waah!lIgton Law.
•
5
• ,
• ,
10
11
13
15
"
17
l8
'0
"
"
13
lS
•
---------------------------------~
=ju.tlUab1e elttenlicm of
~ltern.tive. 1n ~eltlon~.
privilege loiOuld be
FerJeioner Re=pansc brief· 31
, ,
furthered by the options lind
•
Jlud UlehQhoo
1JOO H.C.:lI'Sr • • ~n(on. ~.. "os'
..
•
"
I
,
,
•
•
• ,
,
• ,
•
10
11
"
lJ
"
IS
"
"
]I
" ,.
, "
"
" ,.
"
)
-. , ..
'.
0
"
,
,
,
, .
•• . '
•
.--.. -~--~., .
. ' ,". -,' '-) "
,
-
•
,
'.
'.
0
Jlud ,.'."..,1 .......
':JO' ¥.r..':"H .
• ...,101'1. """. ;U05(
. .
' ..
, ,.
.'
•
•
.. '
,
, .
,
,
•
" ... '''::'' -, ,
, '
"
-"
" ,
, , ,
,
I
,
" -
" L "
•
,
l
•
,
,
•
• ,.
II
II
15
• •
, .
• ,
o
" '
o
To bC9in ~ith. the Soard h~D jurisdictton th~t ia ap~cifie~lly intended to be
to ~he tAct that devel~nt rcgulatJona arc not tho equlvalent of
~r~er.tlnd tbem. We uhould 1noto~d be trying to decidu whether the
.:'c¢pnbcnllive phnning and dcvaloptlOClnt r~h.tlonll con:ply ",jeh apl,UcoI.ble
l~ws. are eon~intcnt. and tollow the ~o11.boratlvc and oubatantive proceeaeD
ot QO.A and U.lle IS&P",'."
We ahculd be very ~uch thInking Cirot whether the CIS 10 .dcqu~tc and about
hov to can.true the LAva and apply them to the facta of record utJll:Jng the
jH"ln;;lples o! otatutory conlltructlon,"
~, l SSI.."E!J •• Gtated in WDr.atct.~ S"poct:._n,
16 (1) Doe •• pACty'. failure to eleely .FI~~l a county'. apprOV31 of ~ .tto·apeciflc
rt~1 b4r it fr~ challenging the validity of the re1~e I n a later LUPA eh.l1e~e
17 to ~nty approval of a plat .ppltr~tlon to develop the property?
ul V~' ClIehn Cou:'lty" ded.!o."'I to haue Itn IO~;S t H' tho IIlghll\nds proj«t in.tead
18 or requiring that 3" envlren~nt.l icp.ct ItaC¢Dent be prepared clearly errcneou.?
,.
"
"
•• IlCW U .21C .010
Report.··A-~lce-·!n!oraation .
The legillature .~thorll". &rod dlreetl th~t. to the full.lt "~ttnt poI.lbl .. , 111 The
pol1daa, reogulatien., and la ... of the nate of V".hlngton .hall be interpreted .rod
a~ln~~tered In accordAnco wlth the pollc!"a let torth in thi. chapter, and (2) all
bran~~~a at 9~e~~r.t of thil ~t.~e. Includtl2 a t a ta .gl oei.l. ~nlcip31 Ind puhllc
corpor.tlona. ana cou.ntlea .ball,
la) Utili, •• ar a t ... t ie. loterdlaelplJolry approaeb .. hleb v iII IOl ur. tb.
toreg!l t ad u •• o r the ~lur.l and l ocia l I ciene aa a nd lba eovironmAall l d •• isn a rt.
1~ pl aunlD9 I nd in dact.ion .. king v bleh "1 hl ¥a I n iarl Cl on sao" .nvitonaant.
:1:S n -:n ,1Ic1n", I C01''lCIt.ructi 6n upon a le>91ah,tivc .fl.lICt~nt. the-tlllire "equcnce of jl,1)
.t.ltute, rcla::ir>g ta the 1II!1!1O lubjeet. IUtter ahould be ron,.idefl:do. • .• n w.ea r
~ll~ $eb~l . Y. POD H3 . l, " Nn.2d ",. I I', SJ . P.,d gJl (l,7J/. citing Aabu¥D Y.
" ,
, ,
,
,
-,
..
"uti ItJehehon
~JOIl N.J:.;"!lL
"OI'n~on. 1( •• "OS,
, ..
•
•
,
" ,
•
-,
,
-
,
" ,
•
,
, "
•• , ,
'" "
, ,
,
. .'
•
" ,
, ~. ..
..
•
,'I .. ~. .....:J ,.
.-, ' "
,
,
" .
" ,
•
•
.' · · , •
,
•
,
-\ . .,-
• , ..
, . . -• .
'. -.
." " . , , '
-' .-., , . , •
."
.'
•
•
,
,-c' ,
" .' -
., ,'-L ..
' . • • . ,.
. .
•
•• on '-0
• Thoae at:ar:uteD conDtrul!;d to the end thn All of thlllr Actions chould ~ {or
:I the purpoICl of the Ht!II11h. l>lIt(!ty. Cenenl Wel l' Ire and Honala or the publlc.
)
• ,
,
,
•
•
"
11
')
18
" ,.
"
"
•
)1i.70 ROof,'· And tl •• t "'''''"nll proper And 109111 construction." They did not even -
1"11)' iDDUlI1I in th" impAct Dtalement or the record, or .na_r the prJ( or
to the 1 or C'JtJ:l;:cnn .u They pcrfot'"rr.ed the
lind re:one for their olher unOaler"'} purpoaell.41 The dec1Dlon
City ot Renton to tlout the Orovth Han"9cmont Act 10AA1 by 1I11~ln9
u,bAn ccnter development in II heavy induatrlal zone, it perMit. them to
lind circumvent the City lind countywide planning policy regarding
development, ctorm water lind the environr.ent .
·1A~hltlt IYII iou·nt ... Il l, or
teDt ...... hole . Ultcrprctcd in
ot tho ~on~r"l object ~nd purpo.e ot tho Act ." ~r.w.t.', .: wn .:d.,.4J.
Ijon
II SUtutory con.tNctlon
.undard. See
1. " que'tl0n 01 law '~vi~wed de novo under th. error of l.w
'" 11""'_" Cll,
tlVndrr the eubr untld f!.vldencfl IIt~ndArd. the.re e.UCt be! c ,uUlclent. quantu~ 01
evidence 1n the record to llotrcuade " re.ucr,3ble ,~,,~ thllt t.hll tleclored pInellI! l'
tl'\lll . Io'I1.oQ . &7 Wn. App . At 200-01 Idtll\9 II) kl1 . "pp. )0. 11. '11 ".2d 136, n"ic:~ denied, 1
01 "e.ponIlC 1 end othere o t f.lS lcttllr nultbcr 13
Petj~Ioner Rcsponlle briel • 14
, n ,
•
•
JU .rt tlle"""I .....
:JOII 'I.I:.:"$[ .... ,>I..... ".. U(I,.
-.
•
•
-
•
'.
--I
!
.; ,~ . '. -
•
,
,
,.
•
" -,
.. --,
.'
-,
-. ,.,
, ,
,
-~-
, '. . .~
'.
. ,
,
,
•
.'
,
•
"
.,
"
'.
-. , .. .,'
. . .,
~. -
I
,
,
,
\
.nd the int~nt of the Le9iolaturc, tho City and proponent Clnd yet another
)
way to alloW what the CHA ~ •• enacted to prevent 1n the firat place-
c~cludin9 the public. 100' ot environ~ntal qu.ll~y ond jObB, • --~-
SAnd loos of oocia1 and ccononic cl'lvl'Conl!lenta1 quality. to --....
, Tbh ac~1on VO\Ild eliminate oupplieo of indu8tdal land that haD ahlaya been
, ne~ed 1n order to create IllUch noeded joba.laDQe rely on 1141I'l101'1)"
a Aniele 11, S 11. does not apply only to certaln inot"nee •• it ill the
, .upreJ!lC! law tor all wl'.ahlngtoni:m •• u The baole oource at authority for the
10 adoption o! .a :.onin9 code by either a county or It city or town (in order to
11 regulate l;and UleD within ita t.errit.ory) 10 Art.icle Xl. iii 11 of our ,.tote
n "MY coUMY. cit.y. town or to\JT\ohip !MY malic I'nd enforce ",ithin itD Ut\itD
.11 ouch local police. c$nitary end other re~ul.tionn 00 are not in conflict
1:1 conotit.ut.ion ",hieh provideD t:h"t..
15
16
"
"
l.
viti: general lawa." 'fhat. lllUot meon conaiMency with !ltate law. lUI 'Otcll.
, ••• e. A •• eel.tiOD of .ur.l a.ald.et. y. ~'t.. count. '41 Wn .2d lB~. 4 r.)d 11~
(20001; &t. It SU~ r. & an 'r' L~ Y. 'rJ.od. at Sk.aJt Count. 1)5 wn.2d 54:. 951
" Becoute d~yel~nt regulation. DU.t be ton.lltont with the c~rehen,ivo pl~n. the r ,ld '51 tan!.
ca.r.not dtCfUtiO the lanc5 aupply IIv.llable for I~lementlng the cor::prtllenl1~'c plan . Mew
16.jOA .04:JtllldlUdna" t. 5JlJ. 5/1,,'5 Order,p. (;1
.. JfJIDI 1Ii'CDf ~r. r. ,\1 •.•••• pond.pu.
IOn. \NO . ,.",.). rm B.nc.1 nua,
,
,
, . ,
• , .'
II,."" f/u:ftOhon "HID ",.~.l"'r . ,~nl ~. w •. ,.0$'
~"",~",."","'M_'JOS",.m t,.
. ',-
,
•
,
,
..
., ,
J'
, . '.. . -
, ,
-
,
,
• •
"
,
•
,
" .
-• -'I .'_
."
>
"
'c·
, ' ,
• •
,
• .. ..
• -.~
• .. '~
-"";",-.".-",.·.''''.!~'.I.'>'''''.,., •.• ,_~ __ :,_, • .',_
o (") ......
1 '"The broAd Dcope of the COII't.. Itrt. 1.1, 5 1] polJcCl poW(!r ClnCOI!lPIUltlCII .11
:l tI'MHIllIUrcO 10c .. l in nature thAt bCAr .. reiulonable /lind IIUlllltlllllt1.1 relation to
, the puhlic health, "dely, and welfare .rId that. do nl)t. conflict.
.. t.1I the gener-i. lawlI~ ,oJ And I wilb to rUOliert that t.he briefing t.hat h
• ""''',n int.o t.hla action .., •• al,o before t.he CJty lIaaring EXaaincr ."
, are not. even conaict.ent. wh.h the Count.ywide I'lanning Policy"
, "43ft!n the well known and applicable requirIng ..
, prc:poul .oneD public inter(!ot requlr~lI'.enu ill not .allofhd'· It h clear
10 110 thu opet. ~oning ia t.hou!Jht. or •• zoning thAt. doe. not. .hnplerr.ent the
11
"
1)
14
15
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,.
"
plan, they bqlievCl that they ~y reZGne t.he propertJea becaute
they were told to dO no by the prev!oua H41yor. and will plan f.or capital
tac::Uitlea /lind water qU/lllity l/11torll
CAhibit nu~r 1
11Ie cpr ·fUllIe1o'Otk· or ,:nOIlI II to e nlure the c:cndttency (uq'.llrl!d by .le';ll o!
the coqIullenlllve pllnll or cltllli a nd CO\Intlll' ttu.l haVt CClmIIOr\ bon'lIra or nbt
r~iond 1111.1<1", (SlImlbl., 2J04C. roo. p . I)
The City ~It ,uUlere to the plan a~~nt (lroceil let t o nh in the CP I' ••
Citing rill., county Y, rrl.""_ 01 fbi Lew . 1011011'1 . App , IUUI . I,.'rn· •• t. tJO;? lini n
." jurhdictlon ... hlch crellttl' overlnp or c:o nfUc:t >11th a CPP ehould not. b<-Mrn f
hi disregard ot the 11\>1·. Cite. CPSOMIIn CI'".
INlwel.tII Y. alnton. 7J26. roo. p. 101
11 E1oll1blt S ,;?
p.ed tloner lIellponae brie! ~ )(;
-..,.---" .... ' , 41' tl
,
,
"
CW"'"
, '
,I,." l'11C"h<>!_
:JOO J.; 5".:,'!I . '*nH.I'I. or ••... a . --
.. ,
..
" , -
,
..
','
-,
> ' ,,, .. _ .. _. ~",.(.l' I
"
•
, ,
•
..
•
-.
.. ,
" ", ..
Ll :' " .. .'
,.
..
"
,
"
•
•
..
,
•
"
j
L
,
, " '.,
" ,',
• ~ . ,-
, . ,
. ' "
o
1
, cOft\prt!hena l ve CI\V J rO/llllcntal regulat ionll. " , Inte.rpretatlonll of J ... w bre .1110 rendered uDclest! In the face of the
• icy !lct forth in 43.J1C prov!a!o". outlining the renponllibiliticll for all
ot the ~t~te to uee all practicable meano con.iatent with clllentlal
o{ State policy to fulfill tho reoponlllbllitica of cach
.a trustee of the environment for ouccccding gener.tiono.11
nl'. 1:10. -u 1<1 S. t:n hane'. SuprCAc C()\Irl.
"Th. l<onin'J le<Juh'ion CClllpt<lo the h!9Itel[ degrr.e 01
t~Gt upon the 90Y.rn~ntal proeelce. bring i ng ahoul lIuch ftnd actIon",
89 Wn .ld
511 P.llS )5' -A ratonifl9 t IIUpf'Orl of evidence
prtl~d in a rotenlng", "In conaldoring the evld~nee. the court r~ted thbt II) ;,~;~~:I:',:no pre.~tlon or VAlidity ravorl"9 the .ction or re20nlngl III the
ot the re:one ~~vo the burden of proof in de~nltreting th3t ~ondltton.
eub.t~ntiAl1y c~~ed ~lnce the orlyinll zening, and 11) tne ro:ono mu_t ~er
eub.tantlal relatlon.hip to the public health, allety. DOr.l_ 404 velt.re-,
" /lin . App. 511 IU~" ... yln!J. HJ We are !rUld .. od by
principle •• OJ 1:0 pruUlZptfon or velIdlty f,n'Orin!J re::onln9 eKhu. f2J
prCJlOfle.'1e. Iwve the burden of provln!] th..lt c('ndltJ0/l1!l MVi."
00' 1
dnee the or)91nal '1:001"'3 ' III A ro:one Do.Ilt bear A lubllu,ntiat relationehlp
the ~llc health, .afety. ucral., or veltere.
CJtJ •• ea ~or _aunt V.rQOQ v. CIty ot Mount VerQOft, 1]1 Wn .2d "1. "','5. 9"
P.2d 110. 1199" citing Lot:. 11 wn .2d at ~71,'t .
·Spot zoning i •• :oning ,ctlon by _hich •• ~ller .re. i. IIt~led out of • larger
or di'trlct and 'peclally zoned for. uao cl, •• ltLeltlon tetally different Iron.
tneonllatent with. the ct.a.itleatlon of lurrounding land Ind not In accordAnce
wI", the cc.prehen.lve plan-. ~ •• ) wn .:d at S7).74
IciUng ~Jt.b y. ShgH County. 'S Wn .2d 71!>. '141. Ul p.2d.n IUUI'-.,.n: ....
'2 wn.ld 324. ].2 P.2d '2' 11"1), and Dtat~ ~x reI . N!ller v. Cala. to
ld 216. J4l P.ld 505; Sa~ • Neighborhood 2n .. Jrona.~t v. CIty o~ S.attle. 101 Wn.ld
llO. 21., ", r .ld 100' 11984). cited vith approval. Profea,or RiChard I •. DeLtle . He
In WA!iIIlNt>TCN J."I.):t) USC NIP DNIRQliHO/'Tl,L l,AW AllO (l;t1.C71CE. -'he Vice of "Ipot
zoning· la not the dirterentt.l re~ul.tlon of adjacent land but the l~ek of public
lnter •• t juetJflc4tion to~ luch dlaerl=lnaticn . In con.ld~rlng the validity of thlA
,nen!bent the cour~ Ur .. t atlJu:d of luelf the tollowi n'J queltiona,
"00 ve have here a lpot :cnlng7"
~e ltioner ReGponQe brio! -l' fired m(,~8/hM
:,)()Cl ';.~.;:.'Sl .
, .. "ton. tie . ..OU ., _. ---~ -,.-•••. _ ••• ".' ""'--"''''l'''''' .. ,,~ .,;.,0. :· ... ""':;.".."" .......... -0.--
,
, •
•
t
I
.J
~
,
" •
/
•
-" ,',
: ~I ,"
,
I • I • I
'::;t 1 ,.
"
,
,
.'
',L ,
, , ' , • " , c • •
"
"
,
,
,
,
, ,,,
I ' '
" .r," " •
"
, ... _'111 j J'llnMtn ........ " ....... ~.~
,
I
, That hi blatant.ly In dtont'lard of the OWl" lIue I~ perhccly ac-ccpt.tl,ble, •
2 Are all of the evidence e)!.hibitlJ."
J
• "II it _pot loning ot ,uch • c'~f.etet •• to ~ deeDed an arbitr.ry and caprlclOUl
IC\.7°
in older t.o _et t.he It,s, 101 1\. an.vora to th ••• que.tion. with pri~ry
eorpna,111 upon t.,... ."conCl on. tNl CO\It( quot<tC1 tl length trca 8,"",ul t. ... t. vrlun
of U :la ten, and .. nile "yill9 '
"Tho concept of .~ot ~onlng .1 an 0.11 In l~~ field of ~,clpal ur~h i. ~ll
recQ9nitcd by nearl y _II .utborlt! •• •.
·.nd It. II the veri anllth.ai. of planned .onl"9" , Cll1ng. 10J C.~ .•.• :oaLDg J '4.
court aho •• Id. "It .. ,,11 aupport.od IUtee.tnt I. aho found it: , tvner.b.lua. t..IiI .. 01
~~~~!h,,:,"::<~'::h.r ·Spot. ~onl"9' t. tbought of •• toning not In .C(~r~nc. with a
c plan. but. tor ~re prl •• te gain to ravor or bener.t • pArtleulay
lndlYJd~J or ?roup of Indlvidual. and not the w~ltare
~Ity a. a who le, and thut In effeC"t. ']rtnt,,,,, l;y "lIIII!na:Dent, a .pedal
~;::::~;~:';;.,t~':,cn 9l1nllra] r~l.t Ion., -Spot r.oning· of till. nature Iat bot .. n four:.d ~ dllerhdnatory, tnd i.1I".Ud. Aogun, Rhyne, "llniclpt.l WV , clItplCcr J~. p.
US .-t=-Ith Y. 6hfH C\)~nlr. '!o Wn ,:Id '71!o. tH r .::1'1 U, tlSin,
evil toUIJht to be r~dlo:d il not only a C1\.1.1 bla •• [q.roper InUuo:n.=:o:. or
but elto tt~ curbing of COndition ... h'eh tend to create tuapicicn tr~
mlllntllrpretallon, end c~at a p411 of partiality. lcpropr!.ty, conflict of inteYeal or
prej~~J~nt OYer tb. proceeding.'. aee, J . T. Chrabuck at .101 ., R.'pond.~t.c ¥.
~noho.J.h C~untr at .1 ., 'CC!JJ.ntt . 7~ Wn .'d ISO •
.. Ttre ".lI~d3.tory and optlonlll elelllollntt of a cooo:preh"ntjve pl .. n III_at be C'OI'Ilhtentl the
J'lOliciet witbln tho:-VtnOl.l. PI .. n eleccnt~ "\let work. togf'ther, in h"~ny. ana ...... t not
tllI'.rt e.ch other. Although th .. Plan Identitl •• and C,.tJ g:r..t •• IUlufI! ltr.d UI.t, tbe
Plan Jt.elt doe. not directly r~l.[~ land u ••. Nov. •• r, the Pl.n i. T.~irad to ba
The rlAn i. i~l~nt~ lhfCugh •• rloul ~thod5, suer. •• dovelop.ent
(0·9· ~onlng ~pG and code al~ other l.nd d~v.I~r.t controlsl. a~ other
technlCi\le., luch a. fuc.t w: •• urCi contained In I 'I.Ir1lld ICtlon". caplul
IlrogrUi tor i"fnltNCturl! or ro.d u'provI!OI!nt. or lAr:d aeq-.jsitionl.
~ny Pion .1e~nt. an Invl!ntcry and ........ nt o f preler:t COndition. and need.
be di.C'U •• ea and idenlltlcd. The ""YI to ~<:'t the Identl0ed need. ~.t tl"..en be
In the fo rt) of des:!gnatl en •• nd polley .tale_nt •.
de.crlboet,
a tor I rla nn lr~ city or COUnt y . The Plln at.e
thr0U9h ~p delign.tlonl ana poltey .t.t~nt •• the ~.i. and d i re~lon
.chieve that dellrea future out~ •. The Plan'a l utl.lre land us ... p de.lgnat ion.
'naleat .. ~here certain lln~ u •• s outC~. Ire de.lred, the Pla.n'. poliey .t.teecn~.,
t c tive. I n:i goals. lndicul! tI.o~ thOle O'Jtco.:oe. a ee t o t>e Ichiewed . IlorN: r . OJJ?
Order, at 5·6.1
WAC: 2"·02"50 doc:. nOf requlro:-the uriCt application o[ the Washington
::;~,:::.O I t vlder:ce In heari ngs befOUl the' IlNrd . lI;ortllg.tl, JJ(l9, 31/&/'l
p. "
Petitioner RC$pon~e brief . 38
I n:1 ""r;r...l.-etl .'lilO II .c .;:,'n
'~Ion, ~ .•• ~)~
'--~., .--,-.~---' . ..
,
,
----,-......
L •
,
,
,
• "
"
,
•
,
,
••
,
" -"
,.
,
•
, '
'.'
•
"" •
• i ,~
L
c_
•
•
. .
",; 'I:"',~,
"
.. ... ;
.0" .:/.:..
•
• ,
•
,
'they Are required to Implcll\enr. the PU9at SQund PlAn, it hi I'lDo thelr own
•
"
1 Hr. Warren .and Hr. Shuler ilnd tha City on,H. cUid Cor t.hat II\OIItter ""yolla
.. c:o.ncenlcd nhould know tholt ('\'\10 if t)IO rc'Cone 10 valid jbur. it 10 not) a new
s c.pit.l hciliticD Alllend/llC!;nt for high intenllity urbun dcYclop!l'¢nt 10
•
7
• whtcb would have becn vold. ~d they collaborated .nd utlli:cd the procedureo
9 ot the (Ott.A ant! :iEPA'u 'n\ey want to adopt. capital tariUt1"a later. but no
10 requirement to rcas:ocllo the land ulle element if projected funding lollo
11
"
• 7
"
)7
11
"
"
"
"
abort Q[ meeting ncedo ic prellcnr..
'. [JChlbit S .7
.' NlY dcvlflopr.oent l'cgull'ltionll thAt "Uelr,pt to Hl.ple-.ent .ueh 4 tully
nOll·cCft.Plying cO':I'pfchendvc phn ('annOl nand .1 /I IMttor ot 1 ... during
ttUt period. thiU. the pho r,,1h to corply wlth the A.c:t. Re(julAttOIlIl t.hat.
.tt.a:pt. to ir.ple--ont And be cenltltent with fatilly tllwad cO¢prehenoive plln
,ue in tlln! pol1!oned by the ph.:'!'. detecu . III , ... rton, 511!!e, mo. p. tJI
,. The Ilek of • tully coepleted capitll t3cl11[leo pI In 1. ~re than • concap:u~1
Ihort~OQlng • it 1. a ~~t.l 1C9~1 defect in n cocprehenolve pl"n. It alono 1.
lu!:icient c.u •• tor the ~rd to lind that t~ lAnd IIle eleMent And ovary ethe,
c~n'flt of • plio" 'dob:. •• the r.,qul.rc-cu:nt. of the Aet. l.r .... rtOD. 5JJte. roo, p,
""
•• All of th., lUl\d4to ry r"J"".JI o.iI'"4tIlU ot .. eOlq)rehendvl' pl.n I:IIJllt be tully c(IC<.phte at
the tiM of pi "" adopr.IO>l , ICltatlon. (IIlI1Ul'd) A co:aprehenUye plln·. c"pitAI racHity
.1eaUle it l" .... tne.My hn~"d t o the hncluoe elelllent . The tWO lIrII.t be conablent..
The hnk"J" b4ttoo' •• n the ~..., "lelllltOnt.. U "'hat ",",ku pllnnhl!J under the OKlo. troly
eo:oq:l' .. hen.I",. Ii .'" coe;phlfl. u ,clulive. ccnnected) II. c:ompAred to pre·QQ. planning.
l.r~rto8. 5)"e, roo. p . 771
"'M, ctlvelOpr:lent rco'lulatlonll thole Atttlr'?t to iIt-pie-r5O!nt "uc:1! ol fully
ncn~~yin9 ~o.prehenllive ploln cannot .t.n~ •• II ~tter of law during
the pUltxl th..J.~ the ph.n 1.111. to ec-ply with the Mt. Rt9uhth:IO' that
Iottc .... t to iw,)1fl1!lent. .nd be conlutent with' fat.lly U.",,,d c~rehell,lye
pl4n aret ~n turn pol lie-ned b)' t.he pl.n·. dcfe-~t •. I.r ••• rton , SJJ9 ... roo. I'·
PetJtJoncr Re~pon#e brlet • ]9 IIroOa l;Iicl'lOhOll
;-JOO It • .:.;-,':a.
'~n~OII. W~. "CIS' --.•• -~ -_'''''''''''""",,, ..... -,.~-I$P"';O:"'>·,'':IIt ...... , ....... ,'t.·., __ -
• ..
-.
"
.-
-
•
..
"
~ I -.:.J
'.
I
" . , ,
, ,
I
.,
•
•
"
•
,
,
'0
•
..
. -
,
"
, , ~'
. " •
, .
. ..
, ' •
. . "
,
,
"
.,
• ,. , •
"
"
• , <
., " ..
" • ..
,
"
,
,
,
"
• . '
•
"
•
,.
,
,
,
• ,
,
7
• ,
10
"
11
15 ,.
17
"
"
20
"
25
L
• •
•
••
,
-.. : . ...:.-............ ---. ..--"''''' .
o o
GOCiAl tmd r.conO(llic Vahle!! have been unlAwfully J~lIored .u Our ...... ll,1( qu"Jit'l
and !jlllmon l'cOOurClI itl very valuahle et:tlnOll'lic'lllly. ,,"d t.he rJndlnyll .and
Io .. It:h regard to Willer 11111111lY lmprovC'rM:nt. Arc clel&rly CHlc-lIe-oll l:. 1.0 ill
applicable to thh C8DC,U That phn and Tt:~llJht.lonll t.hey b.ve ia goiJl9 t o
'
,y';';L ,_ clear l~l the 1~1.1.lur~ Int~n4ed that ~nvlr o~n f.l ~.l~e~ ~
full conllderatlon In 'J()V.,rr~l\tc deCillion .. .tk,,,,)_ .lllId It iq,l~nt"d
policy through the procem.. a1 llf ..... lt;{mu ot 1;r;PA .. hie!! 1:parlty ttl,. ~";,,,; and l!lttent of thll lnfonMlIOn t.hAt IN.t be' ~'r!lv HS~ ... nd "Meh rfllu\lt:
cona t do r al j on. ¥~'~O~"~~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~G;"~~' ~. ~~~'~.~'~'~.~'~"'~'~"'~'~"~~'~'~'~'~"~'~'~. . aUI . at ,6'; l~~~~~~~~r ' ""flU Itt.. tI'. 4'):); 5'1 .. ".J "" .... lu .ar ValJ_)' eo-unity
."pCD at Oet,er"n~·. the Jlroceaurlll rC'Ql,llrel'lo:'I:'1. o t ~I-!I''' •
dtlli'JncH1 to proYide full er.Ylror.r>ef\t .. l \1l!C1nMth:m. ,hOlllo ~
lnvo)te-d vnellCYl'C .:>Ore Ullin 3 modorlte effeCI U"\ the qulllily o ! tho ~nYiroa.t.ellt 11 eo
reftD~bte pl~bl1ity ,
city Or D .... , •.... COIa .... n, 5:1 F.ld "1. ~71·1' , n.1G (nh Cll'.)
.~o voluso IIn~ qu311ty o~ ~tOrD vlllor dl'cIlIl1 9'" .... oel .ltd ~i \h lrA~'lr,.l
IIcthril), .. 01 depend on /I n,,::ber of h e t on. h lc:ludln<J t.he ;nd;".tr'hl
IIclivlUell oceurr!.r.g at the ht'il1ty. the nature o r prec ip!luion •• nd the
tle9 rce of .. "rface lcpervlouDne ••• ~In •• ler aay PIC~ up poll ~l .nt~ (r~
lind other a"rtllcell 1111 it drain, trOll tnt' lAn". 1n additiOn •• au«=CI 'I';;'h,ro~;llut .. ntl other tn.n Gtora w,lttr, I"cn '1 HhC'il C'onn~t.101l •• Ip1U" IIr.d
II iepfoperly l1;.ztlped IrJ u rhl. <:Illy 1ncrn.ue the polluunt. lo.>dl dUChllr'l)r:C
frOl':l 1t:p.1Ute ItO"' se",on . The S01.lrc:t'B whiCh Cotltrlhute-roll"t,.r.t. to Itora
w.ter dt.c:~r9cI dIffer ~llh th~ tYP~ 01 in~ultry ~r~tlon and t~c:l l lt y·
llpecUlc: lelllurll!'. }'or e),./l~le. l'Iit' e ... "llonll ""'Y be " III'Jnlf ic:aM t.Q\HC:C of
pol1\ltllntll ot 1I0fl\e fllc:11hlc: •• =te"ial DtOra'Je OferDtlone ..... ). bo!! ,r-port .nt: lilt.
djrlerrnt operation •• ",hih, o ther fII C't lilhtl •• y dIIlCh,u'O" ItO"' w4tcr
",Uh industri.l IIcthU)' ~nh rC'lDUvllly JQW lr ... c:lB ot pol!\I~.nttl •
....... t elltcndvely IItUiH~d !ltom ",ncr dlDC'nftr9" lui"''' bel'!' tho .. : (r(.CI
rraldtnthl IIml C:~.l'::eilll "ren .. iur1l4n runo UI . c ... "l"atlr.<J lllra<:' di .. :::!, .. r<j .:I::
11 ,'foyjdt II .l,.rtlng point;: :or underat"ndl.ng the pol luUMI that can l'~
r"I>f'cted in c t OI'!!t w~tr:r d\flc l;H9l!s oQl~I/lt tld ",I th lnd'.II;tr.l~l lIoctn·ll)'.
1I.,cI NJ':l'\<Il...,11
.',0'; ,. ... ,;.:11 !it.
~~ftt.",., w~ ~,e.\'
, -
•
" •
•
, "
• •
,
• ,
,
•
,
•
"
,
•
•
"
,
"
, ,
',\
-.::J
"
•
•
"
•
•
, ,
• ,
"
>
, l
• •
> ,;. ..
<
,
,
•
" ,
,
, ~ L
,
-:,' .. " 'I ... ' ' ,;.:... ' .~, f ~~, •
, ..
..
" . ,hi "" ' r' : " . ... 1' .'
"
,
"
'" ,
• i"" __ .. _~_ .......
.. --' .,''-.-••.....• _--..; ... ''' .. '''.", .. "'~"'''''-,
o
1 King C01,lnty .... as compelled to "dope the BHP'o DO ul'~,ently nceded to protect
l t~o aendti· .. !tieG of phil. .lnd wUdl1ta habltat" but it appear., that for lhc
l I<okanec. that ruling haD CQI:\C too 14te," "I'. Warren contend a they will
~ protect the fiah 13ter DO thAt they do not hAve to change their regulations
11
..
15
"
"
'0
"
"
"
-
during the adoption oC the CPP but now acto
"'.any nor-a. _tel' dllc!largcll 1111'0 eXllectcrd to cont"ln th" l'IoOllutMlt. typ!clllly
••• ocl.t~d with urb4n runo!!, along with additional pollutanto th~t reRult t~ ther D~el!lc Industr!al operation. nr the !~c'llty ••
s. ftd.Me<]. 6l,U,. At; 61,lS)'!i4 W:)V. 19. U9ll IdtotJOtI.OIIIlttlld) •
~Sto"* .. ,ner runott trO!ll lend_ IIIol::hfjed bV hu~n IIcLivithll can 11;11'111 lurt.ace ..... ter
re.uur~1 ~nd. 1n turn. CIIUle or contribute to In exceedanc" ot w~ter quality .t~n~rdl by changi"9 ~turlll hVdrol~ic pattern., 'CCelarlti~ Itrtll. rlow.,
de.croying .q~tjc h.a~itat. ~nd el,vllting pollutant concentrAtion4 lind l~dingl. Such
runot[ ~V contain or eobili1e high levnll ot centll~I~'nt., .uth 18 eedl~nt.
,ulpended 'olida, nutrient. /pIIOlphorou. and nltrogenl. ht'liovy IIIfIt.)O ~md oUler tOlllc
pollutantl, rathogen., t~n., o~Ygen·de=andlng ~Ubltaneea 10f9anlc ~ter'all, Ind
Iloat.-bl"l. Atter .. rain. ItOrlll vater nlnofl carl"', thela pollucanta lnLO nearby
ItT'I&I, Ti .... r •. lak" •• e.tu.sd .... wtl.neSl, lind oceana. 1tIa 1 hlghllut eor.cent:-atlMI
ot thel' cor.~inar.~e cften .are contnlned In .Iirlt flu'h . dl.e~rgl!' ... hleh occur
during the tirlt ~jor atorm 4!ter A~ e~tendl!eS dry Pl!rlcd . Individual IV lind c~'ned.
th.l. pollutAnt. i~lr "~[er ~~ljty. thr •• ttning de ligna ted ~ne!JcJ31 UI.I Ind ~.u.lng ~Abltat alter.tion or de.tTUCtl0n. 't red ,Reg . 61,12J, liI,n4 (Pee .•• l'U)
o. ~Aa I~eh. the ~P •• hould l~dlately epplV to AnV all diICh.rg~1 th3t are .u~ject
to the per=lt. In o:der to fUrther Inlura thl# re.ult. YoI"? COuntv should BeYe
expcditloully Without anV rurther deley to en.ct In ordinance .d optll~ the 5urlace
IoIlt"r Delilln lUnuol Ind do '0 no hter than r"tlOlary I, 19U. "a !ltd en the for~o h19 rullr~, the bo.ard ente~ the following rull"9.
It' 13 Ift1l.t:ny o~m:RJ:D thlll Su.."Qllry J'udgeent 111 9"lInt"d conllaunt .. hh the toregoin9
f\l11ng t ein, ~I'" L.a.\:. SI_I"hn, y. Xl"" County I'Clfll 1:0. n ¥U7
.. tAAlbit 5 .'
,
"
.:'
,
,
'r .. d Nicl'lnhOll
JJOCI 1:.£.:11'$1 .
h 'n t c". Ii ... "OU
,
, "
• ,
" . "
,
/.
r "
lJ
•
-........
"
, ,
"
-
,f
,
..
" ,
.... ,~ ,
"
,
,
,', .
..
• "
•
-. '.
•
,
'.'
,
,
• •
•
,
•
• ,
..
•
•
,'T-,
L -.. "·-,,· •• · ...... · '" •
•
__ ... ..;"",.0>1 _-.... .Jt!I!ifIf.r.:,':._
.. -
•
•
, .
• . ,
'.
.. •
,
,
r
VI. collet-untolt
,
1 /!Ide-quae)' of the £1:; IIrC! pl'oper},! before t.1II1f lk>ard . 'J'}\h proeef'din') ohould
.. IIlOve for.roillrd [01' rCDolutlon of the l •• ue/ll and bIIoed upon the taetl ot record
, th~t JUDctfy 4f{J~lIYe reI Ie! in v.y favor. Jt Dhould not be dlopoaed of
(i .... Ithout the IIcheduled he/llr1n~." The lnLCH'"Yenel' or Cit.y h •• not. flroved Any
"7 (act that juadficD dicllliaDIIII ."
• lIowdvt"r, ('eeft-ioner hac pToved enough," ,."d C411 no'" be grant-cd relie(."
9 The hct. ahow the subDtllntial ipcondlu:nder. \J.etYecn thr. CPP and t.he City
10 plAn. or the hllure of the City to Jmplcl>(!nt t.he f'hn. Ther~ are
Duball'lnti41 lrrc9uladt1eJ. and vl01,u.lonll of WAohlnglon (.lIWS . u
It
1l
']
"
•
.. SU!':'I:'.ary }ud<Jl"ICnt u .. I'foced""e availAble t o .void unneCOl"~ry tn.t. on to.".,l
Iuuta thllt CAnnot be factually .,,"pQfled and c(."\Ih1 nOL 1e.lO LO. or A'\llt in. II
tI!\iQrablo outrocse to tho oPPOll1l9 p.trty . J.r;Clb •• n v. suu, n W:I. ~d 10'. !t, P .,d
l1~l 1"111
" t. The porty c.ov~n<j fer a..-.ory iu<$.~nt ...... tt .~ th:.t there arc no gnnUlnfJ t ... un o t
l' eatcrilll 'ACt tlftd the IMVIOfJ roar1y ill entitle!! to ;1O~p..:r.t ., .. ~u.er ot 1.... lU7\lh
Yo •• ,aoa '1' ... kJla 1"Jtl . Co •• tne .• 1)1 vn . ~d 111. 1Il, 9)0 r . ld lC1 11'$1)
"
"
II nu~~ry ju~~nt ~y ~ grAnted whelc th~l~ Are no genuine i •• aCI ot ~tcrl.l t.rt,
Ilnd the 1 .... allpporta ttlt' 1IIlOt lon •. WAC ~4:'1l21 Civ1 1 VlIleG tor !:I.-pI!rior C'V.lrt t 'CR'!
!,6tc:l.
II -The U(HlTd ltOJy .lno grnnt _die( to tht non '_ln9 p.rt.y-. SUI. r.J>!""ova" .... Dept .
of •••• nu •• 120 Wn.,d lS1, "~So 14) r .::d 15;1 IU9~1 . There .n: no Ijen.ulne ilsun c:t
-.aterh} 'act .
•• r.u~ry 'ud:Je!C:nt l. AppropriAte when the only cor:tro .. cn), 1nvolv~. tht' lI;Catung co!
$t.lIllClM. lIru1 tlelthef" p.lIny cent ella tht rActa fO!!ltv.nt ~o /I }"9 .. 1 d~':.t;1)ln.tlen .
!!lr.lal' Ita t'J .. a nk v .• 'I'.l:udty ;frAta ftank , ~, lin . "flf.!. 161, 1('4. 7" r. 3d ul(u ~cl.
rt;l'lr"rlI:IIlN. 111'1On .:ld Ion •• U!i V .:l4 ::!UIU'!\.
flu'1 tlle""':_ :~tlJ. tl.,..;:,.'!t·
"~rllon. h' •• U OH
."-.-.-~--,;,~~,.,.,~----'''"''~''' ~ ... ~ '-"-"~-'-. ...... --
••
L ;'
• •
,
" '. • ,
.
"
•
,
•
~_J (.,'d
" ..
• ..
,
."
•
, ,
•
, .
..
,
, ,
. '
"
•
,
,
• ".
•
I ,:; .. .:" ",'o. ,. -
I
"
• 1"'-
, ..
. ,.
• • . ,
, .
• •
..
• •
• . ' • •
.. •
--... ""--.,,_ ... -. ....-,. ..... _, .,----' ..... -..
•
•
The property Ja to btl utili::ed tor IMnUhcCllrin9 itnd indulltry for the
l torctleeabl& tuture, which h 'mdinputed. tl .\ny normal perllon of real&oflAbly
l good .. nd nO:'ltI.ll lntelUgcnco knowlJ that DOIIIethlng uhady Ja gOing on here -.. thetl. 7'ha City and Int.ervener malle dllwaJtivcly (or nu~ry dtnmJuoal,tl Tho
S EIS fa In.dequate aa a !II;Itter of LAW but" reaoonably thorOu9h dhcuaDlon o[
• the probable aignlflcant .dverae imp.eta that viII reault from thi. propooal
7 that. .. rc in dispute. II Again, the City haD lathd to effec:tuuc the
• C"OCr.I.it:e.ent to reaU:e the requirelllcmca of the Puget Sound Plan to protect
• ",.,ter acc:or:Un9 to the CPP. 'thot pIA" IIIUDt be CArried out according tl>
10 requJroeGel1ta for coll.lboratlon and coordination.
11 The reJat.l.onahip between 82 .02 RC'W and 16.101+..010 has been clearly
12 o4tabliahed by the 1e9ill14turo. ~nd I undcr.t~nd that P46t dec~oion •
.)
regarding IIl.O:! RCW aro stUl IItanding. whicn h wny , urge the Doard to
14 conoider thAt the undiopuled fact that C\Jlft\llIItive Jmpactll may only bel
addrellDed with C~~rehensJve planning and development regulationa:" ..
fl A ~terlal fac~ in a au~ry ju~nt proceedi"9 I. one t~t viiI atfect the outcoac
18 unde, t ~ 9~vernlng law. Zrlk. ~. D."~.r. 118 Wr..'d 451 . 45'. 1'4 P. 2d 1201 11 "'1
19 .. ':"be trier of tact. a.at eonltr\le the ,wld-enell and conlider the ""teria} fact. cnd 411
rea-otl4bl. intereN:ea t.herefrOOl fn the 11gnt r.ott favorable to lIle n~ving p.IIr :y .
20 W •• t.bar~a v. CUar.'aca. " Wa.b . App . 1" 11',:), III P. ld 1251 •
"
"
•
,
.. The ~ry judg:rlent prOCedure u deIJgnotd to eli=J.nate tflA} H only q"..IUtiona ot
law r~ln !or r •• olutlon. 6rlk. y. Dea~ar. III Wn .ld 4~I. 45' •• ,. P. 2d 1201 (1":J.
.. WhO:!. • ,u~ichl C'Onclu'io.'l ot the PUt wllieh elUblhhod 4 I'JI,>bl1c policy co-.
a3aln. a::eepted aoa"eptlonc ahO\ild be r"e .... :.tintd in the light or curr~nt condition.
and thlnlung . "len:_ y. r.u •• Val1_y "'llOOrJd HO.p. A •• 'II. 4) Wn .1d 162. '&0 I>.ld
"5 11'5'1 The t.ctor. Upon which public policy t. baaed .te not atatic but cha~)~ ••
cl;l!'41t1ona and ... ,yo or lOOking at th~D9' en"n,)c: publle policy Ilheply r.e.ning that
policy nC.;Jt]nl::ed by the Agency in dll!te",inlng wtwlt /lcta are I.1nhwlul or um111!.lublll
a. being Injur!ou. to the puhllc or contrarY to the public good.
lIud Hio=~J ..",
lJQO If.&'.l.',n .
'nuC>:!. If .. , U:tU
L ,>.:.ll", .... :O~ IU $'~.'.·.'.----·7,..
• .
,
•
•
". ,
,
.'
•
•
. .
,
., . " .
...
t
J
,
•
\
•
.' "
, .
,
"
..
. ,
,
: : •
,
, , .-
, ,
,
,
,
r-... , .. , •
..... "....-.._ .. '. i':t:L • ~
"
,
,
I
"
, ,
.. , ...........
!\G~ (or the City to carry out the I!W:IUll,Irea th~t "en: outl ined ",ithln
'( 'r ,::->. fC'Dolutjon 'll~hat There IIrc
, IMnd/lt:ory requll"clllentG let!.. out of the City Cllpitill hClliticD elCi!l>CIIL ."
• There are errorlJ 1n the co1Ip.clly presutr.pl.lona in the' £1&." Tha, high
, lntemllty UIb .. n develop~nt: lind retAil oIOuJd pour pollution through tlu: 16
, untnrn ted olOria w .. ter outfalla. John'D Cutlk, .nd ClubDequcnll) Into hke
7 Wuhingt.on and import.nt Sillman hlibitat. Un)u&tifJably ",it.houL dhcuulon of
8 what will hllppon without the needed DMP'. t(,actual adoption of ordln.lnceo)
•
10
11
"
,
"
1S
"
"
10
19
"
"
"
"
"
tiM ad::lnlalU;t1VCI connl"\.lction of • IIUlu!,.e I. p.trl.icularly perau,uivlI if it 1_
Ilearl), conl~raneO\l. "1th thl' I'nact_nl of the n.tutc .. nd the l.or<jl.htun, h ••
"~Ilt.!ed the nAt,ULI! without dlllturblll'J t h_ l''JtIlCY'. Interpretation. "'''rC'o.
InC'orporat,d. ..'pondant. ¥. Pu,at Sound ",Jr Pollution Control "'2aoC'(, .t al .
App!JJanta . SI Nn . App. 49. 1~1 r.'d 1:2'
.. III A c.plld l.dllUte plAn n1e_nt conll.dn<;J of.1 'a' M Inventory of
eXI.ting caplt.l tacllit le. ~ed by public entitle •• llnawlnq th~ loelLloll1 Ind
clI~clt1e. of the capital !ACllltUllll ibl _ f ortlcAlit 01 th .. ~u, .. nred. tor Iud'!
CII"lt_1 lftcllill"a; lei the propc:~ed loculor._ Ind C"PlClt!e. of .·"P'lIl,led or n., ...
clpH .. 1 tacllit&el, \dl at lean. 1111·Yf! .. r pbn that .. ill rlll"llcc "lOCh clplul
tacllltJ,,_ .. Ithln pro)~ted fundln'J c'p&cltl._ Gn~ cl •• ~\y IGellll l lea llOure •• ot
pubhc QOflllr tor lu;::h purpooeGj .nd lei !.2egulre_nt to r ....... en Ihf' lar.d UII .. f'1f_nl
It probllhlf' fundlr.Q f.ll __ hOft 01 eeeling nXlatlr~ lived, and to cnlurv t~~L the land
ulle eleNnt. capltal l.dUtle. plan elntol'nt , aDd tillAnc ln9 llian within lhe capItal
faelUtle. plan eloe~nt aroe coordlnatrd and COIlCUt<'-nt . 1·~rk.M ror("fenlon
'ac:lUthl ,ltdl ~ inclUded i'l the capaal (.1.1:1\ 1\ If" plan t!le~I1 t..
I' All or the ~nt.!.tory fl!lQ1.l1rellOtnle ot a cOt::pfnhen.1Ve phn r:ullt be t ullr eceplete at
the tiRe 0: plAIl ~doptl¢n ICltlLlong omlttedl A cosprehenglv~ plAn" e.pitll '.cl1ity
de~l1t .\I Inextriclbly Hoked to the lInd un tll~nt. Th" t~ ..... 1t be coniliunt .
The llllk'ge betweco the two elc~nt. il whit ~k". planning under the OMA tl~ly
coc>prehen.lve CI.e ., cOI:'f,lete, InclulI1ve. colllle("tadl II cCft:p.red t(l pte'cP"Jo pla..'IflII'9 _
Inr~rton. SJJ'c, fDO. p . 111
The lack ot I fully c~pleted capital '1("llltle_ plan II ~re thIn a con ~ptval
'hortcO!:lIIl9 • It III A fatal Ie.JlI.l d"lect in • coo::prehenllve pI",. It .1O:>lI h ·
II1(fleJ"nt e.ulle for the UOArd to lind thn the land \lgn ele_1It .Ild .. 'O'er), O'nf>f
c:or.ponellt of II phn violate' the rCi:i\Ilrf;1:W!r,u of tho '.ct.. IDr_.rto". 5JJ'::. f":lO, p.
15 171
Petitioner ReeponDe brJet -••
II •• d ""l:bOl.""
J'lJO N L .. ,·n .
•• n l ~. w. .,~s, .1 .. -.. ··'-'-··----·--··-·, -·'-.. .,,,\:IotIl.. ............. _··~ .• :_' -•• --, .. ---., ...• '-......
, ..
,
"
" ,
, ,
" ..
•
..
•
.'
•
•
,
"
• ,
"
"
• · .:.
-. ;
,
"
,
•
•
.-,
" •
•
,
,
, "
,
--
-
-
.. , ~.
~'" L
'<'\ ." , ','
,
•
,
"
" ,
..
, '
,
-.I
I
1 I
j
I -,
-,
•
" ,
•
-' ,
, ,
I , .' .. .. " " -, , .
-,
o
,
They nevu ... I!IC:lltloned .... 1t.hin the enulI:':rated ordint\ncClO or the EJ$: they
:1 hlled lo -reDpond to the Petit.lon: or anywhere In tho record th,,[ they would
1 be dhcour.:IIglng inductrlal ,:1.1111 fD.1.nutnctudng activity on the cite . U Thot
.. would thWArt the I"lIleo ot the board and CHA and !>SPA. They did not. P"IIO that , l~hhtion . Or" adVAnce notice ot the pencUng change; J wolnteO to know the , anaw-er to the Petition: 1 .hould have h.ld • OHA r19ht to notice for tho , tonr~tion of Statement ot ilouea; but City deferred notice AO that I could
II not t'U!M! the 111.\1(,01 r do not diopute thAt they could attefllpt it, it io
9 juot that: they can not nttCII',pt It without notice thAt h the w"Y they want
lD
11
"
OJ
15
"
"
20
21
"
"
to proceed. tI
'I If • lQeal lrglo)t\tIY~ body wieh~G to ~k~ chAngel to th~ draft of a
pr(!poard cOlltpfohr:ll!vc plan that, to tr.:llt point, h:.. oGtcrnDibly utiGucd tI,e public
p4rtlc:ip.1tion rcq-JiremcnlD o! MCW H .7'U •. 020(11) and ,140, it Ii .. the dhcution to
do 10. H~y"r, it tho crur.I1lJ_' the lC!<JillAt.iIIl!! body whhol to II\:Ioke -'lr" aulunanthlly
dl!rcrent tt"elll the rec~ndJoti o na rcceivCld, itl dilcfII!tion ia contingent on tliO
con(11 tiona I
111 th.at. there lJ luttil::lerr.t infOnNItiotl IIndlor anlllya'i 1n ther record to IUJlPCIrl thl!!
C'ouncil 'l new chOice (c .g ., !:EP" dlldoluro V.\I given. or thl rC(}\ll.ito financial
analyala W.I OO:'.ft tC o:aet t.lle ACt'l eoncurtenq-Tequircaentll ; and (21 that tne
p.bUc ~. had a :-ealtOn llble opportunity to rc~1Pw and coo.oont \leon the eonle=(llat('~
c:h:.nge . If t~. rirlt condition d nol not ."I't, ... ddition.al work t. lint required to
luppert the: C'oImcll'l "'.Iblcquent caerciae of diacrlllion. If tho Aecond condition doclll
n~t rallt. effective ~ltc I~tice .nd r('alonabler timo to revlO" and co=mcnt upon tho
IWI.t anthl ctuongOIl IWllt be Itrordrd to tho puMa' In ordll[, to .. eet tho "ct'o
rerqulre~nt' tor ·e~rly and continuous-public pArtlci~tlon pur,uAnt to ~cw
l6 .?a".140. eee.
(WSD' r, 4326. roo. pp. 16.77
•• ·~e CHA r~~ire. a Juri ldic tlon to pro vid& r4t lce and the opportunity for public
p4rtlcip.lluon, either prior to, or deer. any CHA action ~ tht: adoption or 111:enlk>r!nt
(pc~ncnt. tt:~rary or lnterl_1 Of cO¢prenenDlvt: plana or l~le~ntln9 regulation ••
Tne CKA ill clear: • jurla~i ctlon ~.t al .. :.ya provide the opportun i ty for public
~rticl.,.,tlon. incl\MSl.ng notic e". IHcVlttJ. v. 0)16. roo •• t '1 .)
-" juri.dictlon ~r not bAr ~A public participat ion .tandi"9 by not p:-ovlding n otice
or tho 2Pportunity to P2rticipat~ at any t 1 ~~. e i ther prior to, o r after. adOPtl"n o f
an oIleC'n<b.enl to a Glo'A Pl~n, dl!vl\lOIlftent requlittion or othar rt'lated Q<!A docul"lent . It
no notico or opportunity tor publiC partlci~tion ill proviued for • ~A actio n. 4
~tltiont:r -ay a •• ert GKA partici PAtion .tanding pur'uant to PCW 36 .10".210121 IhJ".
rHeV1tcJe v, 0 1l6 . roo . at 2'1 .
Petitjo~er Re6pon~e brief -45
"
,
,
,
,
--
o
'ud nk~hot'! Hac N .~.~a·S t .
.'!ltot'! ..... "oh
,
o
"
,
o
,
,
'.', y , ';r!
"
"
"
--I
,'-
, .'
,
• ,
, -
iJ ' , ,
,
-"
-j' '"
,-
•
-,
• ,
,
"
•
,
• "
• , ,
•
" .' '. ,',
• ,
•
•
•
. ot>l.IUQf!:;tr-1 " •• """' __ '_'
-~'-,----. , -
•
,
•
1
,
1
,
,
6
1
• ,
11
11
,.
"
"
11
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"l'ubllc "oticCl 10 Dt the eon: ot public pIITtici ... lion. t:t!t:ctiYe nll litCl is" ntCc":u')'
and tuentlo1 1I\'Jrcdlcnl 10 the public plllticil'"UQn III'OC"O'", IIBICP. In!.. roo. at
',1 ",Iotict" h rtoGonollbly reloted to puhllc pardcl~don. IUrIldl"3 concern •• bout .. loc.ll gove~nt'. r-ub1ic portlclp4tlon "roc ••• i. Dutlic lent to ehAlle~]e the
1UTudietion 'G noth:c pH>cli'd-lue be(on Ihi. &o.ud. llI'a.C'C'O. In~. roo. at '.1
"The ~t eond~tcD th3t lh. public ~.t ~~Yf an OF\~flunilY to be ht)r~ and c~nt before an "11th hour" chAngo Ithat i. not ~Ilhl~ the fl.e c~tl~~. ot P.CW
lC"10h.Olsnll bl l I.. adoptDd •• poIrt 01 c::01:;nehcndve plan°, t •• ,u,.. ... g,,· 0)0', roo, a t
16. J
"The pub11C ~rtlcipatton goal RCW ),.10~.D2011111 proyld~. ~n u~rftlla ~~r whlCb
.\1 the ~~ public participation rcqulr~nt. tit. lt .rtJ~lat~' • prcnl~ on
lnVQlvl.ntj eiti:cm. In lhe enllrr GXA pl.nnll19 11rv::e.JI .n:j I\I~cl(i c.l1Y ~O'Il-fl' th" leport~nee of public portiClp.tion for ccepr~hen.ive pl.n. and develOf~r.t
rlttjuhticns". IW,,\'JuJa v, O)U. ftX). at Hi .l
~ 1Ufl,dlctlon =u.t provl~e nOllce .nd the opportunity fo r tho ~l lC ~o ~~tlcl~l"
pdor to .00llt.1nl) any 01".), pl.n or 'l:I.n~nl tCO th.t Illan. lHeVttth t'. ell'. roo. at
lS .1
When a chan~c 11I1"..er.d;~ntl 1. lIub,tantl.11y dl«lectol'lt. Irer.! lhe prior drDig:naticm. t.h"
public nec:!D 3 rCllflon,t>l" opport.unlt.y to ~nt. \V •• bo.n-,lt·Ury. S3GBC'. roo, p. !'II
.. I pceltioner Re~por.~e brJet • 46 1".<1 Itldlc>l ... " ;leo IJ .• ~I.'~t. ~~~I on. ~.. "05~
I L:: ... SlIII,..= ... '.---__ 4\'~"'., .r .• ,~-•• --
."
•
, ,
•
• •
•
•
I
•
-'--:T'
•
•
"
• •
. ,
. ,
--
,
"
"
,
,
-.d ' , "''"' .. -.. ,
•
•
l I
, f ! -,
, .' I
'". J , -,
• t ,
.-'.
,
-
, I •
,
1.. l\.o .1 have lIhawn. it i. unr_allon.lble. to nQt ."ult.:dn tho n:queot for rclhr.
1 All of tho luuea OTe properly before thi. bo4rd, depondin9 011 the outcome . .,t
l the £15 flppcal. CClft'oe ot tho hllue I:\&y re-emerge, And when the cOI'I!pnhan ll l.vc
• plan eccncnic development. element bec~a conal.tent. the other iacuoa nro
, apprOprlMC . It the City Rcapolldent .nd Proponent Intervener would rCllpond to
, the i.,uca .I. appaaed to okirting the~. the proee~G would proceed caDily and
., without the need (Of" motion tor dl.~lGoal . A demon~tr.tlon that the
I!I prcpoeal ill conaiGtent with CPP. StflA, CAA. and l.c!J.J1 t'l':quircf\\C-nra mIght.
, diGpollc ot: the inoues . This iG opol ::.on1n9 outright:. Thore 4I.rc III.UIY CMA.
10 lneonsiateneieo «nd failures, lind uncontroverted facta. They h.we no t
11 1ncluded tho BeAt Avaihule !;cience. The C,tpltal F.,cillthA phn and 111lPact
1.2. fee ordlmrmcea are severely l:u:klng 1n G ... .A c o n.iDteney. A Aell!.'lnd o r
11 decl ... r~tlon of invalidity should enDue, '\8 oppooed to .It. dia~iooal ot thele
Re»pee tfully $u~ltted,
,
Dud tHchohon
2)00 tl .IL ~eth S treet.
Renton. ~aDh i ngton 9805
~ r ",dll J"1Io ho t "'''' il ... :.£O,!'
14251445·0 (j ~e
Petltloner Re~pon~e brJef • ~1
..
..
•
-.
""'!! lIIeh:>h Oll :,tlP rl .J:.U'St .
I:"!l t "". It ... ,,01'
,
. ,
. ,
. '
•
" ~ .
,
,
,
,
_f I: , ..
,
." L • • ,.
•
'.
• ,
.'
, ,
-~~-" .. ,~,~---",., -.. -----..... -*~~~~.,
1
)
•
• ,
,
•
• I.
11
"
1)
11
2.
"
"
.. ktltjolter
1
I L _ . ......-,.~--. ~--.. ' -=-L -",.> ---
•
, . ,-..,; .. • ..
.'
,
• ,
.•. , . ' •
-,.'
.. ,
...... ~-.•. --., .. ------.--.
, • ,"\
• •
•
--. , ,4.
,
•
•
, , . , ,
"
• ,
• ••
I •
,
'.
-.
:', '. ,',
I ,
•
'" •
• . ) .
, ,
•
"
•
• '" • ,
,
-" . .. • ,
, '.
'.'
•
•
.1 ." -,
,
, , ,
"
'.,
'~"
, -
•
,
"
, 'L.::' ", , '
, ' I,
-'
"
•
,
"
J , -
" 'L ,
• •
, , , ' ,
"
..
c
, ,
" ..
"
II, 6BG\lm :NT
I. J'dilioncr', mponlt hritt '.ib lu a OlWer Ihe q.1 afl:umeab orRen1on
and I~ing.
Bcforc the Honnl', drodlioc of MW't'h 15, 2()().1. both Renton and 80cing fikd
disposith'c motions to dismiss exh W1lI C\tty or.:: o(pccilioOO"s 21 ~. The: rmtlons
are prim:u"ily ba.s&..-d on jurisdictionAl grounds (non-GMA issues, standing. limit4t.,n.., dC.)
nnd the g~rnl ("ilun: Ofp,"litioner to tile: (acts or bw th::allRJpport his i..~s. In ansv..u,
petitioner h.u made: no response to the rugulllcnts m:Jdc by Rtnton Gnd Iklcing.. but rather
heads in It completely new direction. odding new issues nOO new clthibiU;. all wilhout b\'c
of the Doa.rd. and nil without cit;1oon to hd previou.~y stated 21 ~. Petitioner's
Response Bricfis a response in nrunc: ooly,ll.I it doc~n'l respond to My of Rent all or
, 4 BocinU's legal arguments.
'5 PcliHoncr setlhis c:usc in motion nod c::stllbli~hcd the iMues he wi!hed to h.1~ Argued
'6 before the lloard. And )'ct. his responsive brief is 1010.lly de\'Oid of eillllion to any of tho3/:
'7
'8
issues. Pclilioncr choo~ 10 ignore his 21 legal issues hut nrgues new issues. n.ppttm1lly in
'9 support ora motion for summ.'!l'Y judgment. Eoc:h pkOOiJ'Ig by retitioner seems 10 oJ'll::n rK:W
20 issues and new liocs of nq;wnc:nt .
2'
22
23
2_
25
26
27
28
The 00;mJ and the respondents ~hould 001 h:m: to siR Ihrough pctilioncT',
rie!klings. nllcmpting (0 g~ ",-nal issue ~ being discussed. when (he rules c1C3lly require
citnlion (0 the issuc 03 pan ofttle text, \V AC 242-02-570( I) stnles tiS folloW!:
A pclilioner. or a moving pany. whc'n II; mOlkln has b..'Cn fik."t1. ,]\,.'111 submit It
brief on e3Ch kgollssuc it eXJ'ICl.'15 Q boanllo dctmninc. Fnilurc by such n
party to trier an issue shllil oonslilute nlxmoonrTM:tl1 oflhe unbddcd ksue.
Driefs sroll cnurm.'nl.le nntJ.sc1 fonh the qui iswc:(s} 1l.1 spcciflCt.! in the
prchcnring order if one 1.." "'-"'Cn ClllerN.
RENTON'S RI;IJlJrrAL TO I'IiITI10NER'S RIL'Wo."'ISIi
kIIRIH'1"O DISPOSITIVE MOllONS FOl{ I)ISMISSAI •• 2
, ,
r
l
I
I
f
_" . .uno _._,., ...... , .... .--. ...... _ ...... .-... _ ..... -. ___ "" •• _ . .u ........... ..
" ,
"
, , ; ,
,,--
"
,
,
,
"
"
,
{ i
,., .
, •
, ,
"
" , ,
,
.~ .. ,
,
~','t
,
, .' "
, , " r ". " , '., .
• . ~ , . ' .
L
/' •
•
,
,
,
•
, ,
, ,
•
,
." " ,
.' \.'. <
Ii , ,
. ,
.' ,
, "_ I
; . ..
",
Pl ', ~'-.. . ., . , .
." ,
... ,
r --
,
,.
-
, •
.-
,
•
.-
,
,
L
-
"
, ,
,
" ,
,
" "
f] -
,
, -
L
., ,
,
,
. "
"
"
"
,
,
1
2
3
,
,
, ,
.' . ,.ttl.t~.~,,,,,,~, _',_
['C!)Ourtc:S to 00 the job thM is pclitiona '5, in the first ifl1tnncc. Pditiona', failure to
COlTetlly cite 10 the Record :mould result ill consequences to pc1itioner, nnd to no other
rurty. All of petitioners exhibits NJould be rejected nnd those pori! orille l"C:SpOR!ivc brief •
5 t:u..-.c:d uron those exhibits ,hould be ignored .
6
1
8
J, PttllioQtr II ... r.tltd to rollow ~OnTCt flrot"ccJu~J to JUprkmC'Dt.be
R«onJ •
Petitioner's list or exl!:blll, JXlgc 12 of petitioner's n.~-po~i~'t: brief, conhtins exhibit.
9 nol cortnincd within the Amended Index to the Record. 'OlC procedure for slIppkmcnting
10 the record is sct aU: in WAC 242·02·540:
11
12
13
l'
15
16
New or.uppltmmlal nidcn«. Gc:ncrally. a bo:.u"d will t'e"tew only the
n::conJ developed by the city. counly. or~ale in taking the oction 1ha1 b the
subject or review by the bow. A pnrty by mol ion 1031 ~uest Ih:u 4 bow
allow such additional C\'wcncc III would be necc$.SU.t')' or of substantinl
6.'\Slstnnr..-c to the oolU"d in rcxhing its decision. and sholll sL'1lc its reuons. A
board may order. III My lime. toot new or surJllc:mental c"-:.dencc be
provided.
l'ctitioncr Caikd 10 move 10 suwicmenl the rcoord and atnnol simply add new
17 c:<.hihits 10 D re:sronsc brief. Not only did petitioner nol properly mo\''e tn ~bmit the new
18 c~hibit:s. he did not submit those exhibit5 in lime rur Renton and Boeing to ~udy and
19 rrep:ue objections. nnd he didn', atlach the exllibits to Renton or Boeing's copy oftus
20 response brief, Renton IlJ'lIj noeing may guess n.s tn the contents of these exhihits. And tn:Iy
21
22
be nble 10 rdUl'f'ttl $Om:! oflhe infomlation f,om their fila. oolll1.lt effort ~hou1d be
23 UlIllC'Ct'SSOlt)' if pclitkHlL'f h.,d rollowed the rules.
2ta The proposed new exhibits should be rej...--ctcd for failon: I<Itimcly naIve 10
25 supplement the fC('(lrJ wMt n.s copies Wttc nevcr rrovKIct.l to Renton or Bodflg.1
26
27 I Rmton did 5lirul~e 10 the .dmissibilily "flhe I k::afing E.umina-'s dcclsm mi'Qij,'Qa '. do: lil"Ili;(' lu Ihe
aJeoquxy ofR~ntf'4l'J f:,ulffwlImlllllmpxt StIlMnml. Rmll~llltesum:l t1lo1llhe 1k:ui.1i """UII'''-'I'''
28 dcci~ion It lhe &rok", rcktmcn! in I.ilt ofl!.UIihitJ Nn. 5.12 un ~ 12 ofl't:lillol<'S', ,~" •• ".~ l:fi<:t.
RENTON'S RlmmTAL 1'0 1'I~rmONI:R'S RJ:.SI'ONSE
k URIHfTO OISI'OsmVfi MOTIONS fOR DISMISSAl. -·1
, •
........... -~ .................... -.... " .... ,.-"' .. -. ... -' ....... -.............. ..
---.~ ..... """ .......... ..-... ""''''':o:''"' ........ ,---.... --.. -----
•
•
' ..
f
I I
!
F' • I
I,
l , -