HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF-02-141 4+1
2
lkausc this EIS rc\'kw$ a non-project action u,volvlng changes to the
COlllpc:hcnsivc Plan, oJopt.,n or new flJJn[ng Cll.lcaoOcs. Ddopdon of dc\'Clopmcnt
3
_ II4ndards And rezoniny nremain propeny. the changes ore 011 on paper and none ore on
5 th: ground, causinn cnvironmcntlll impltCl:i. This docs not ClI:CUSC the: City from doing an
6 EIS. but substantially curtO-iis the: extcnl and depth orlbe rt.1ui~ ElS. In this p.1f1icular
1 inl-unce. the Cit)' went w'ell beyond WMt is r:quircd by the: law.
a
9
10
11
12
13
n
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2_
25
26
27
28
A OOn-proj«:1 ElS is-discu5llCd in WAC 197-11-442.
(I) The lead aacrw=y shull have more nc:xibility in preparing EIS', on non ·
project propo",,1s., hc:c4USC: then: is oortn:llly I~ detailed information
Available on their environmental impucls alld on nny subsequent (lrojec:t
propo!l.'ll.'l. The EIS nlay be oombinc.<d with aim planning documents.
(2) TIle lead "gency slulU di$CILU impoac:ls noo alternatives in the lcvel of
detnil appropriolc 10 the scope of the non-pmjett proposnl and 10 the
level ofp1llnning for the proposal Altnnolivcs should be emplwil.cd.
In palticular. agencies ue encouraged 10 describe the propoSlll ln terms
of IlJtC1"l\lUive tnl::Sm of accomplishing n stated ob}:cti~ (5tt WAC
197·11-060(3», Ahcmulive, including the proposed &Clion s.wukJ be
analyzed Ill. roughly compatable level afde-Iail., 5ufficienlto ewlualc:
their compBl'llli\'c merits (this docs nol require devoting the s:unc
numbct of pages in an ElS 10 cnch alternative),
(3) If the non-project proposal COntm\S II spn:ilic geographic area. site
spcclnc tIllIllysc::s arc not taluimJ. but may be included for Ill'C.IU of
spt'Cirtc concern, The: EtS should identify subsequent action., thai
would be: undmDkcn by otha' agencies "" Il mult of the non-ProFt
proposal. SUth as tl"lU'dJ'lOrtaJion and utility ,yslemu.
(4) The ms', d~,,"ion of abemativcs for • comprchc:n.,ivc rlun.
community plAn, or other art;I;widc zoning or for shordinc: or boo U5e
pmns shall be limited to II general discussion of the impnctJ of 411ernate
propos.1ls for politie1 contained in such plo.ns. for land usc or shoreline
designations. Dud for implementation metlSUI'eS. The lead agency 15 nol
required under SEPA to examine all conceivable policies, dClignation.'I.
or implementation mea,un:s but should cover" runge of such topics.
The EIS content Imy be limited to " discussion of alrcmnti\'eJ which
M\"c been formally ~POSaJ or which IU'C'. while not formally
proposed. reasonnbly rebtetl to the proposed octlon. {Statutory
"'ltthorny. RCW 4l.2IC.110. 84-05·020 (Onlcr DE 8).39). § \97·11·
442. filed 211 1lIB4. ,rr""ive 4/41114 .J
BRIEf OF R£NTON REOARDINO
ADEQUACY OF EIS Paae ·4
•
, ... """' ............. 01 , ..... ,._._ ...
... "'"-", , ~
.... ,' ...... _m'"'_. ". .................. 'u ..... "' .tI,
• • •
1
2
o
Thcrc(orc. the: non-project HIS may be Ius dclailed. ernphasizing ullcrnntlvea and
Identifying auhsC'quenl octions Ihal would he UndCrlBkcn tlJ u result of the non-proJa:'
3
II proro5a~ 50ch as a gcnC11l1 discuuion or impro\'cmenlS 10 the tramportnlion and ulilily
5 . l)'stCrns. That is cutlly what h:l'! heen done 'n Ihis ms.
6 Of cou~. that ~ n.:ll mcon Ihllt there will nol he funhtr C1lviwnnk"nlal rtvkw.
7 WAC 197-11-443 discuues I!(S (oRtenll wt.."11lhcrc wn.'I 4 prior ntlll'prnj«1 ElS.
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
n
15
16
17
18
(I) The provistons for pl\ll'Jed review (WAC 197.11-0(10(')) IUld u.e "r 1 ... I .,~'M
environmental documents. r4lt Six, apply 10 ms', on nlln'rfUjc~: , ... otrd .. l"
(2) A non-project pt'OJ'IOSDI m:ay be Qptlro\'al haloCd on an HIS il,\j(!i{ifi" "J hml'\l
imrocts. When n project is then proposed lh.:lJ. is COMlltCllt with INlllrrtmtd
non-project action, the ms on weh a projccl Jlt:lU rocus on the IntlNl (:b •• .1
ollcmnli\'cs including miliglilion nl(lIsures spctiflc 10 the SUhscqUetli rruJ«t and
not IUlIIlp.ctJ in the: non-project ms. The ~oJ1C sholl be limited IICconJingly.
Procedures for U~ of cx~ins dlxumenls sMII be lUCd IlS ArProprialc. 5C'C' "l1rt
SilC.
(3) When prtpurlng II projcct ms under the prttcding subsa.1ion. the ~ ag~JM:y
shllli r'C\'icw the non -project ElS 10 (f\surc.tl)311hc aMI),lIis is \l1lid \I, hen Applied
to the current Juuf1OSOIl knuwledSc. and tethnology. If it Is nol \'111M!. the
nrt.1lysi~ stull be rcanlllYI.cd in the proiett ms. {Statutory Authority: RCW
43.2IC.110. 84-05-020 (Onl" IJI.! 33-39). § 197-11-443. filed 2110184. crrcclh~
4/41114.J
Later prof1OK'd tk\1:lopmcIlIS (project ftcliom) will M\'C 10 comply with this
WAC S4.'Clion and. if it is ~Mislcnt wilh the ArrrO\'t'd non·prllject Delion. the: subscqucnc 19
20 environmental revtc:w would focus on impactl and .ltt'fMtivc., not previously annlyud in
21 the non·propt ms.
22 Phased rtview is spccirlClllly Aulhorir.cd when going from a non.projttt EIS to II
23 projccl ms. WAC 197-11-443(1) ,nd WAC 197-II-06O(lXeXi).
3. AI'PELLA'I]; COURT DECISIONS ON TIlE AllEQUACY OF AN ElS
Since 1984 twelve Wn!lhinglon Appellate dccisians h:l\'c add~ ElS od:quocy.
27 Only three, 400 argu.obly Iilur, oftoo!C decislonll have found the EiS inodcqwlIc. One of
28
nRIE~' OF RENmN REOARDINO
AOEQUACY OF EIS ra,c. j
, ......... --
"'UIIIICOiU' ... t , ..... _ .. " .. , ..... .-. __ ., • ",,"....on_OlIo ..... , ..... ~--, _ .............. , ........ _ ....
· , ..
1
those dl.ocblons.. K/~wll C"lUlruCIIOII Group v. elm! C:ount)'. 83 Wn. App. 133.920 P.2d
2
1201 (1996). 'oII.llS II challenge by the project propment ufthe cil)' council's d('(~ion IMI
3
It the EIS was inDdequale, The (Qurt found thAt the £IS did not Gd~.u the: specific Impact
5 oftruc:k lnltnc on 4 nurb)' bicycle troil and did nol discus! the fellJibilily of building
6 direct DC«SS mmps to thl: project. lb.: COllf1, thercfofl:, upheld the County', decision to
1 Kquite 4 supplementAl EIS.
8
9
10
1 1
12
In the C45C of U'eytrhalUC'r ". PIC'tU c.'t'Ulrl)', 124 Wn.2d 26. 87) '-,2.1 498 (1994),
tbe-court held :m EIS in:sdcqU3le. In 1YC'),,·r/rorLrtr. the ElS wns found iruadcqwttc for
failin, to include analysis ofM)' Illlmuth'e sitc, for II proposed solid 'oI."imc landfill.
In Dl.mit I'. Kitsop Cftunl)'. 93 Wn.2d H43, 861, 613 J~.2d 1148 (1980), an ms
13 was found 10 be iIWIequ.1.te becAUse the County did nul sullicicnlly dio;cU55 altcrnalive
lit shopping CC'nlCf sites and the:: 01d\'Cr.w: aOCi:ts on the ell)", dO"llllWm busll\('u district.
15 Inlc~il1Gl)'. the court held tMI "eonlcmpornncuwly prcpaml cit)' ms .... -as Itdcquale on
16
lhe question of impact of a propo5Cd shuppin" ecnlcr un the Ilrcmcrhm ccnlNlI bwiness
17
18
dis1rict. The court found 1~ city'S EIS adeqwtte when it conillined liule rmrc tMn tI
statement tMI the !h..lpping cenler could produce a d«ud..: of t"Conomic Slognnlion ,imilar 19
20 to thAI ctctItcd by the building of the Tacoma MaiL buitMI llmncrton hIMJ a concerted
21 pl4nningllJ1d l'C1lC\\o-a1 effort lhat could creole the coooitton.' that would impro\'e lhe
22 downtown business c1imoJe and du" the future: of the central husincss dis1ric1 is highly
23 dependant on what sl!Un decide to remain in lru: centml businoa distrkl. The court held
2' lhal the city's ElS WZlS someYl'hDt delicicnl but ,.ill odcqlWlC under the rule of rttL.'01On.
25
26
27
28
To the e:dent Burrlt. c. 1980 CMC, roukJ be held 10 n-quirc 11 JOCtoo«onomic
DRIEF OF Rl:lrITON REGARDtNG
ADEQUACY OF EIS Pa~. 6 \\:.\RRI!N MRIlER tJ I~ P.!. _ ....... _ .. , ......... , ....... _ .. .... ,,, ...... __ .
_ ... ' .... n, ..... u ..... " .....
, , ' , o o
1 aMly,is, the rule \'in.. ch:mged in 1984, when WAC 197·11-448(3), WAC 191.11 .... 50
2
IIIld WAC 197·11·726 wc"' odoph,.!.
3
In fUCllhc rulo now lillIe tMathe leno loc:io-cconomic I, 001 UtA:d in the rulo Of
5 stmUies beeuu.se it docs not have" unifoml rI1CDnins. WAC 197-11-441(2)
6 The wurth au< i. :':A.I':F. '. &,''''11.89 Wn.2d 862.865.576 P.2d 401 (1971).
7 That case did not explicitly oddrcss ElS odcqU4Cy. The CIJ$( addrCJSed saanding. »pOi
8 zoning, and the app:t.rllf)l:t of faimess doclrine. Ilo\.\!c'fU, subsequent GI!iCS., including
9 COIhcun v .• ~homlsh County. :wpm. }\3\.'C c:tvsr.cIcriza."ClChi: decision as having held the
10
city's ElS inadequ:ate because the P.lS fulled to odJtns the extra jurisdictional 1 1
'2 consequences of 0 prupoKd shopping cenler.
, 3 TheR!forc. all four ofthe' cascs lMI M\'C held an ms 10 be: inadequate ~ project
1" EIS', 000 not oon·projcct E1S'~ such as is the case III ts!l1J('. and each ElS found to be:
15 inadeqUllh: \\u, found inadeqUAte bcc.uwc of the fnilure of the documctlt 10 discuss II
16 required cLement.
17
18
flven II pa~ing mention ora required element has been held adcquole. Batr/~ r.
19 Kitsop Cmltt!)', supra Similarly in OrAl. Y. Adum.~ County, 128 Wn.2d 869, 91) r .2d
20 793 (1995), the eour1 upheld the adeqwxy of an ElS (or regio".,' solid VtUe landfill.
21 uhhou&h the ms did not diKlISS allemnti\'c sites and did not provide detailed analysis or
22 ground Vt'U(er impacts becllU5C the)' "~ going 10 ~ whscquent rc:quin:d n=gullliory
23 DPProVIIIs. In CArOW". e llYo! Auburn. 126 W.2d 3S6. 894 P.2d 1300 (I99S).the CQur1
2' uphckJ the adcquac:y orpn EiS DsaifU1 cMlIengc:s that it f'aiktlto include rtn.'Wnable ofT.
25
site and on·site aitcrMlhn lind imumciemly DnI1I)'7~ lromc impllCls. The cowt noted 26
27 tMt Utero WQ.S It discUSJlon or ImiflC impoctll nnd thai M alrcody bod lrank: sitUSlion
28
IIRll!f Of RENTON REGARDING
AO(QUACV Of £IS p.Je. 7
-"'--'
_ .. """_._ ............ .-._ ... .. ~~ ..... ---. ............ _-. _-.. ...... ,.
• • • •
1
2
3
(level ofscrvicc: f) wouJd be made worse by the tmck. The court reasoned that the EIS
hod disclosed. discwscd and substantiated the cnvLronmcntal Impacts amd so was
II odeqWlle under the rule ofrea.son.
5 The conc:lu.sinn is IMt the courts MY( bcc:n lenient in detlding the question of
6 at.kquac:y of an EIS ond fur1ha Mve been very practical in applying the "cost
1 effec:th-.:ncss" discus.scd in &uric. SUP"' IU page 2.
8 In the: cue before the lIeDrins F.II:aminer. then: Is no area being chnllenaed that
9 hAs not bc-en extensively discussed . The tnwportation section of thl: EIS is thirty·sill:
10
fXlgcs long and the tethnital appendix is sixty·t\!,'O pGl:es with approxim3tely twenty·five
" 12 pogc::s of attachments. Thc'sc two sectiolt" discuss sueh Ihing! as existing conditions. trip
13 aenc:uuion of redc\'elopment Df'Id infl'1lS1ruclUfC Improvements ncttSSlll)' to support
111 redevelopment. The surftlCe watcr discussion is included in the wuter resourtes section
15 of the E1S. which is twenty-seven pages long SUpportL-d by 11 technical appetxiill: that is
16 lwenty-seven pages long with four attached figures and D WIllcr qULllity technical report
17
dw is forty-nine ;>Dges long. These S(!j;.don.", a.gain. discuss such things III existing
18
conditions. the impoclS of ~cveJopment and in CrnstrudUJ"t impro\'Cmcnts 1\CCCSSAf)' 10
19
20 support ~lopm:nt. The ElS has • sedlon un fish and wildlife lulbill'ltthat is len
21 peses long and supported by a technical appendix Ihlt is twtnty-se\~n pilges Ions. These
22 KCtions discussed the: nearby bodies of waler, the species or fi!h in these wnlm. the
23 inllutructUJ"t ntte.ssitah .. d by cach redevelopment rulemotive and the: improvements to
2' the marine environment under ctM:h atterl1lltive.
25
26
27
28
Under any and all or the reported t!1$C dc:<:iJions concerning the odeqULlCy or an
ElS. Renton's no~projcct ElS p4M(S with Oyin" colors. There i! absolutely no C45C
BRIEf OF flENTON REOARDINO
ADEQUACY OF EIS Pap •• \\?r.RREN BARBI!.R {} FtNTES. P.!.
, .... """ ......... .,..", • "Wf~_WI ..... " ..... -.. .. _. _ ......... ,. .............. 111 __
• • • •
1 authoril), thai the cXlc:n5lvc anal)'lo~' ptcpnrt:d and J'"'C$Cnted by the [IS docs not
2
complacly ::IIlli.sfy SEPA.
3
q 4. ARP.AS NOT RI:QLlREO TO liE ANAl.YZEO
5 So the record is compic1e, certllin iuua \\"ttC ruiscd in 11 sixly~ne PIIge brief liled
6 by the app:llMt cmd not SCf'\'td on the City Anomer's office. Oral object ton wu made
7 10 these i$Sucs at D pte-trilll conference held Janwuy 13, 2004 . The City argued and
8 Jlocing concurred thAt the law support., eliminating certain issues raised by appcl14nt .
9
10
11
TIM: City orally cited o:lcvanl WAC scc.ttoR5 which are documental hen:. WAC
197·11448(2) staIN ttw "The term lOCio«onomic:" is not used in the statute or rWcs
12 bccuux the: term .doesn't have • uniform meaning nnd bs ClIu.scd II gte31 dad of'
13 WK'Crtainly. WAC 197-11-448(3) )1.!1t~ in relevant p;ut exumpks ofinformatton that are
1'" oot required to be disclL'lSC\J in lin ms Ole "economic ("(looitian ... and 5CH:w.1 policy
15 IU\IlI)'sis (ruch as fhcalllnd wclfo.re policies ... ), Simihl1ly WAC 197-11450 stldes tMt A
16 cost benefit annl),si , (WAC 197·11·726) Is not required by SEPA",
17
18
The Exumincr hns alreAdy ruled by Order dala' JanUlll)' 19. 2()().lthlll "'roO called
socia economic issue,. rolilkal issues or rwoposed s:alut3rych.mgcs to tq;ublioM ~Inot 19
20 be raised", It ,",'Ould be apprupri;1lc for the EXAminer to citc the 1Cl;1t1 basis for his urder
21
22
23
2q
25
in the finAl d«islon.
CONCI.1JSJON
This non·project ms t~ suhMantially beyond /lny legal requirement! fur an El S.
It fully disclo$CS., discu.~! and stlMtanliolcs cnvtronmcntal impacts. chooses four
altemath'c scenArios including maximum build out and MUlyzo the environmental 26
27
28
impacts so tho'lt any proposnl cncompuscd within the four ahcrnolh.'eS wlJl ha..,: I:lc:m
ORII!FOf RI:NTON R£OARDING
ADEQUACVOFms PlF '~ \\.,\RRES BARBER eo f(JtI.7ES,. P,s.
_ ............. _ ...... , . --_ .. ... "" ......... __ r
"~ ............. -'" ................. ..
· . '.
I
2
fuUy lUV!I!yzcd. Arldition:sl environmental n::view will be done for Iny project proposed In
the IU'aII Mllyzcd in Ihis EIS. Under the rule of 1'CClSOn. this ErS Is adequate. ~ OATEDIhl> q~yor UI'W 1"'1.2004.
"\
5
6
7
8
9
10
" 12
13
n
15
\6
17
14
19
~o
21
22
23
24
~5
26
27
28
Respectfully submilltd.
WARREN. DARDER & FONTES. P.S.
Attorney for City of Renton
T10.J9:46
BRJEFOF RENTON R£OARDJNO
WARRP.N RARJ\CR6 FtM'I!S, p,s. ADEQUACY OF EIS PIp:.IO
• • • •
1
2
3
q
CERTIFICATE OF SI;RVICE
On Febrwuy 9, 2004. I caur.cd tn h: sctvcd Uf'l'\." counsel ofn:cord. at the Dddn:s.s
5 stilled below. viot method of Krvicc in.Jicl\tcd, a true o.nd correct ropy oflb: Bric-f of
6 Renton regnniing Adequacy of F.ts.
7
8 Mr. n .... Nichobon
2300 Nt! 28-fArce'
9 Renton. WA 98056
10
11 Mr. OnJcn Schuler
Perkins Coie I.LP
12 1201 Third A .. 'Cnue, Suile 4800
S<auie. WA 98101·)09'1 13
-'i_ Via e-fTIlIil (Urad821@hotmail.com)
~ Via U.S. MlliL III Class. PostAge Paid
X Via ~mail(pc:hukr@pcrl.:inscok.rom)
X Via U.S. MAil. I' Closs. Po""!:" PAid
lq I «rtif)' uoocr JlCnnll)' ofpcrju!,), Undl'f the laws ofthc Stille ofW£l'lbinKIOn and
15
the Un ited SIDtes thnt the fortsolng is true nnd COfT'L'(1.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2_
25
26
27
28
DATED 01 Renton. W4.1hington. this 9-da)' ofFebrua.l)·. 2004 .
BRIEF OF RENTON REOAROINO
AOEQUACYOFl!IS f'llae -Il
~
."""" ..... ~_., .. ot _ .. ,.,_,._ .... .............. --_ . ... _ .... , ... _ • ou ..... ," ....
• ' . •
1
2
,
•
•
• ,
o
BIfOU TJta CIlttRAL Joan 80mm
OROM11l KM{AOIXSHT HPRINaS BOARD
IN AND fOR TltB STAT. or MASHINaroN
• In the JI'.ottter C'oncemJn9 purported ) t:aaa No. 04-0)-0004
C'OIIIPrehenslvo pJaMJn!1. dovoJOpllClnt I
, reguJatJon., and .0nJn!l en.C'~nt. I
and .-ndment. ot tho CJty at Ironton, )
10 I IfOTS POR RECORD
11
12
1l
15
16
11 ..
2.
.~.4 .1cholIOD. ~ ettJ • .,n
vt .IllU1tCl1'
Petitioner,
v.
ot tho Cl. ty I ,
City of •• DtOD , ~ seato ot w •• hJngton
HUnJcJ~l co~r.tJon'
, , , , , , , , , Rallpondant.
---------------------'
TO. Central pUgot Sound Board
AND TOI ~lnl.tr.tlve Orflcor of Doard
AND TO. Partl •• ot Record
FEB 09
Pl •••• take DOe., Petitioner telephone number and a-Mall addro ••.
21
22
"
Telephonell (US 1 4145-0651
phone number noto - 1
•
Ir"" HkboJ_ ~H;O " ••• ~.'.e; . •• nton, ~. ,.OJI
1
,
•
•
•
• ,
•
•
•• ..
"
13
"
17
" ..
,.
"
o . '
P~~n. number note • 2
;,
_dl,
Rupecttully,
,
Brad Htcholaon
llOO N.B.28th street
Renton. W •• hlngton
91055
.ud Iftchoh_
~JIIII H.,.J,',r. '_"fOll. ••. ,.gl'
,
,
,
•
•
•
o
alro'RI TIll CBNTAAL PUGIT somm
OROtn'H KAHAO!KINT 1iIARINGS BOARD
IN AND roR TIl. STAT. or MABH1NGTON
'f In the .. tear concerning purpocted I cu. )10. 04·01 ·0004
COI!I'rehendv8 pl.nnJng. doveloplllont )
• regulatJona. and l'onJ:n9 enactftlt'nta )
and ..-ndIMnt. ot the cley ot lIenton, )
, ) C:EfI,Tl'ICATK OP SIRVICB
Irad Kiebol.oa. ,. tJtJ.en of the CJty )
10 ot Rentonl )
Pet ldoner. I
11 v. I
I
n Citr of "anton, ... StAto ot ""."hJngton I
HUnlcJ~l torpor.elon, I
" I lIa.pendent, )
,. I
I
,. I
nb h to tertUy that I Cilluacd el".o part lea ot record and tho board and
~lni.tr.tor to receive ... copy of a note indIcating MY telephono number and
prepaid) •
Cortlele_t. of ~orvlco • 1 ..... d HJC/IOJotoot
IHlI) H ••• :II'It •.
• .nton. W •• ,.GSf
2 the State of ., .. hlngton .
,
• ,
,
7
•
• ,.
11
"
" ..
"
"
17 ..
" ,.
21
"
"
"
25
CertificAte of Service -:I:
Dated thJe 5"' day ot February, :1:004
Rupectfully,
Orad Nlchobon
2]00 H.I .2Ith Street
Renton, W.ahlngton
91056
425 -44'-0".
b r ad827.hotmall.com
.nd NkhoJaM
U OO N ••• U',t •
•• ncon . w •. "OJ'
•
•
•
BmNldlobon
2300 N.E. 2!111_
R.nton WUhIngton O~
•
-o ••
Ronton City Clerk
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Wa.htngton S8058
•
.,,,
CITY OF RENTON
FEB 09 1004
~ ...
'«0.
~ruz"
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
• •
I ,
) ,
> • ,
• 9
III
II
" Il
" U
I.
" " " '" " 12
2l ,.
" ,.
o
OFFI CE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
IN RE nm BOEING COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENTS 2003 -
NICIlOLSON APPEAL
I, Tin B. Heino, declare ns follows:
NO. 02.141. ECF, CPA. R, EIS
DECLARAT iON OF TIA B. HElM
I. I noake Ihis deelamlion bnsed on my own personnl knowlcdse nnd, if enlIed
to testify. would testify as sct fonh below .
2. I am Icgal counsel for the respondnnt, The Uoeing Company.
27 3. Attached is n 'me and correct copy orthe Ccntrnl Puget .r ound Growth
" 211 Management Bearings BOlml Notice of Hearing served on Perkins Coit by
).
" Ihe Cenlml Pusel Sound Gro\\1h Mnnnselllenl He.rinss Bonrd on February
" n 3, 2004 .
" lS I deelnre under penally of perjury under Ihe laws oflhe SIal. of
).
37 Washington that the foregoing is Imc nnd correct. This declarntion was
" )It executed in Seante. Washington on Fcbmary 9. 2004 . , . ..
" " " " ..
"
hr\&h" Cok W'
•
BOEING COMPREIlENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENTS 2003· NICIlOLSON
APPEAL· I
ORIGINAL
1201 i llln1 A\'Ct\Ue" Suilt noo
Sc::mlc. Wtihlnglon VIHOI·1099
Phone: UOt'., =,'90l000
Fax : (206) 3,',1·90("10
• I
) , ,
• 7 • • •• " " IJ
" " ..
17 .. ..
l<I
I.
11
" " " " 17
'" ,.
lO
II
" J]
" Jl
lO
)7
]I ,. ..
" " n ...
" ..
"
BOEING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMEi'iDMEl'ITS 200)· NICHOLSON
APPEAL· 2
(GlODJ.oOI14 .. IICWIWIO 0201
Tin B. Hcian, WSBANJI802
Anomeys for Ihe Boeing Company
rukJns Coit UP
1201 Third Avenue, Suile 4800
Seattle, \VA 98101·J099
Telephone: 206-)59-3944
Fax: 2()6.)S9-4944
E·mail : Tlleim@pe:rkinstOie.com
Putdn. Cole W'
IlDI Third Annue. SuilC 4ROO
Sa"'e:. WAshington 911C11-l09l)
Phone: (loc.) ),1).$000
Fit": (206) "9·9000
•
•
.'
-.
I ,
) • ,
• , • • I.
11
" 1J ,.
" 16
17
11
" lU
" " 2l ,.
" " " " " ).
11
" II ,.
" ,.
II
1I
" •• ..
" ., .. ., .. .,
" .. ,.
'.
o
•
CENTRAL I'UGET SOUND RECEIVED
GUOWfll MANACt:MF.N1'IIEAJ<INGS UOARJ)
STATEO'WASIIINOTON HB 032110\
BRAD NICIIOLSON.
Pdiliontt,
v.
CITY OF RENTON,
Respondent.'
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PERKINS COlE
• Cut' ~o. 04·3.()004
NOTiCE OF HEARING
( NICIIOJ.SON)
------------------)
I. nACKGRQUND
On Januuy 22. 20041hc Central Jtugct Sound Growth MonlGtmrnt Hcaringslloani (the
Roud) received I Petition (or R~icw (l't'R) (rum "rlU! Nichohoo CPctJIlouer or
Nlcbolloa) d:l1ed September 6. 2(0), with (our exhibit, tlIl4:hed. The mailer was
wignro Cue No. 04·)·0IJ0.1. Petitioner challenges the City of Renton', (R~pi'lDdt'nt or
'!he Clly) ...soption ofQ,tlimlllcc Nos. 5026, 5027, !l028, 5029, 5030, 50)1, 5032, SO)",
5038,5019 (tho OrdlDlllllett) IUld Resolution 3669 (the Rr3olullon). all concerning " •.. '
Tel.onins action duignatod LUA·02.!41. CPA. R. ElS ," TIte bsis (Of the dtallenge is
noncompliance wi!h Ihe Growth Man.gement Act (GMA or Att), the SI.le
l!nvironmenlal rolic), Act (SEPA) and RCW 82 .02.
Petitioner req\lelits the Board fimilliat!he QNimances IUld Rewluuon (.Uto wmply wi!h
the GMA and SEPA and declare the OnJinanc~ ond. Resolution invAlid . Petltionu
rcqu~1s the Roud del.y establishing. schedule in this UlIItU ", •. to complete the city
proceedings prior 10 estllbUlhing I IClitdule .. ," The OOlrd inlerprdl tho "cit)'
proeecdincs" to be a mDUer pending berore. the ell), o( Renton Hearing EXllminer entitled
The: Boei"S Comprdlcn,jve rlan Arncmtmcnll 200) -Nichohon Appol No. LUA 02·
1 •• , ECF, CPA, R. EIS :lS described in the lIemng Ex..miner'. Order «bted January 19,
2004,' cop)' or which was anachtd In the PFR IS an exhibit.
I n.e PfR Ihcludcd the Bocln, co~)' loS • le"POfWknl. TbII: IkqJd docs DOt hlVc Juru4tcbon over
}mult (01pOnliou. The Dorin, Coq>&ny en petillon tIw OotId to plfTi:ljl.llr in !his m&:IeT " III
IlIIene_Ifll tho,:., Iud" ..: •.
rw-.,l. t104
(H.J.QOI)t NOllce aUtUM,
"'IC 119
EXHIBIT ______ 1 _
'.
,
••
C,nltlll\lt:tt Sould
G, \11'0 til M"'lelnnll flulltttt "'.rll
tOO 4· AHUI, !OlIhr 1·.,1, ~lltr. \"A .. , ....
Tot. (:u, .' ... l'~S .... tl'-'PJ9.UU
•
•
•
,
•
I
I ,
• I
i
I
•
•
1 ,
! • ,
6 ,
• • ,.
11
1l
1!
" "
" " 11
" ,.
II
12
U
" 1S
" " " ,. ,.
11
" ))
" " l6
)7
" " ..
" " .. ..
" .. . , .. . ,
lO
o
The Doatd's Rules orPrxtic, and Proci:dufC:LO: ruwKi in the WashinGton AdminiSllali~c
Code (Wt\q. al Chllpler 242·02. Electronic topics of the Boord', Rules or Practice.
Oed,ions alld a Dicest of Decisions (1992·2001) arc a\'ailable at the noanl's wehsite:
~,J:JUbtt~~I:Q.,!!. liard copy of the Digcst is available (or purch<l.Sc II the Doud's om,c.
Notice is given in the table below or the Tenlative Schedule ror coarcrence and
bunul(') :u well AS filing of briers ~d documenu with the Boud in this C1it. The
~lc is rtproduced in the appendix fOf tilly rcJcn:nc:c.
TF.I\T ATIYF. SCI-IF.Ot1l.F.
CPSGMIIB CIU. Nil. ot..'.fJO()l-;Y/clt"lsDrrl'. City ofRlnlan.
docalOtlib ma.11 be nltd wllb tbe board (one origInal plus four co"l~ on Ihrt~hoh!
p,-,,,hl:d pIper ud fOpltei back·to-bAck) .ad • copy un'ltd apon tbe other party by
MOl. Feb 1. 1004
Tue. Feb 17.2004
MOl\. Feb. 23. ZC11J4
Mon. Feb. 23, 2004
MOD. Mar. 1.2004
Man. Mar 15.2004
Men. Mar. 29:2004
Man. Apr. S. 2004
Mo •• Apr. 1~.1(KU
Mon. May 3. 2004
Mon. May 11. 2004
Man. May 24.2004
·fbur. May 27. 2004
Tbar. Juu 3,2004
nthem-Ise ntH!.
Board Noller: of lIuthlC ISived
Oelxtlinc (or Pctilioncr to Submit Rc·Statcmcnt o( LcgallssuC!
Om.Ilinc (Ot Rc,pootknt', Index (original plus one copy)
Pnburlnz cOOrtrtact: 10:00 Lm.. BOllrd'. offices. Suite
1.,0'
BOlrd Preburlal Order due
Dt8dline for MotionsJ and Memoranda in Support (wltb
exblblls)
Deadline (or Response to Motions (with elhlblts)
Deadline (or RebulIlll to RdpOnsc to Molinn.\ (nrtional)
Board Order 011 Motion, due
Deadline for Petitioner', PrthC4rina Brie(Cwilb c,hlbltl)
(kOOJine (or Respondent" Prchcarinn Orid ("fib nhlblh)
Deldline (or Petitioner', Rq)ly Brief (optional)
Oc.adlinc (or ~UCJling Settlement Exterulon
Hnrloe 00 Merits of Petition: 10:00 I.m.· 121]0 I'.m .•
Doud', omecs.Sulte 1470
'lbr Boud',olr,," ue Iocll~iJ 11900.· AYellw, S"ilC 2.70. Sunlt .
f DOIb dlfPOl.i~ mot_.oo ""Ilimn In WflPltmmf the m:Uftl
'Sec; Rf:W 36.70A.3OO(2).
r-..._
04·].(1004 Notltc orHwlJlil
'trt 119
•
.,
C"'lnl r"e'" ~~nd
Grolt Ib M''''I'''',.llIu,lnl' JlDlteI 'HIDr .h,(u. S041, U,O. 5n1l~. \VA "16'
TtL IlOfi)J",~'U Fu (106) )"'lUI
•
•
•
-
,
I ,
• ,
• ,
• • ,.
II
" " ,.
15
" " 11
" 10
" 21
2l
" " " " " 20
'0
1I
" ))
" " " " )I
" '0
" 41
" .. ., ..
" ..
•• '0
o o
St1l1cmrn1 Ctlnfrnncc
l'bc stilUS oheUlcrntnl negoliations WIll be the fir" ilcm of diJIcus.sion o( the Prthe:ring
Conference (PIIC). If the plrties IIV«! th.1 • mcnlber of the Easlern or Wc.lm'I
Wuhina.ton Growth Management Hurinp Douds could be ofasslrtanc.c.t. ""Iemen!
confctmCc hy aming a.~ I Jettlemcnl nffiCerJ, the Praiding Officer .hould be notified of
the parties' Igtccmenl prior 10 the PHC.
It tbe parties reach ICltlemcnl, the: Prc,il.ling omW' .baJl be lIolirtod and • Stipulated
Oismiual filed with the Board. Jr settlemc:nt is no1 rca::hed. the case will proceed as
finallyaehcdulcd. .
The parties ItC advised thaI the Board i. now luthorized, in certain ailu'lions. 10 CJttend
the 18Ckfay decision dcldline. The Buml may granl "$Cult'1J1cnl extensions" of up to
ninet), daYl. However, requesa (or lC'ttiemcnt cxlenlionJ mUll be filed v.ith the Bow no
I.ler than .even days before the HCMing nn the Meriu (110M). The dt3dlinc for
requesting wllanent extensions in thi. cue i. ~foaday May 24. 2004.
Inlernrelg or Auj!liye om",
If a limlted·Engli'h 'pcalcin& or healins imp::&irtd party neods an interprettt, a qualified
interpreter ..-iii be arroinled at no cost to the rart)' or witneu. A form (or a request (or
an inl«prell:( I, attached to thi, Notice.
If an)' pany requires Msi,live devices bec.:luse or A diSAbility, pJcue contact the Board III
.nc~
Please coordinate )'Our dram with the DoW', AdminiItRth'c Officer, Susann~
Kafluon. She is available 10 mike firalll1TlJ1gerncnts.
P,dlnring Confm1ltC
The Prthe.arinS Conference for tWs cue has been ,el for JO:OO Uft., Moaday
,.'cbrul')' 23. 2004 at the Board', office.\.
Plc;uc be aware thilt fC'Sthedulins the time, d;\lc Of location orlbe pn:h~.uins conftrencc
or bearioS on lhe merits will be difficult. Hov .. ever. if lbt time or date acheduled for the
",rehearing conference is nol pouiblc (or. plJ1)" pluse confer with the othtt pllrtica 10
feach 'g:tecment on .lternAtiye dales or times, and nolif), the Presiding Omeer
immediately, If the Domi', schedule permils, the Uo.w willll1cmpl to ateOm.lnodalc
the propo.cd cbange in scheduling,
I A Cnltnl P\I,n Sound Uond mtmber •• el'YllIg II. ~nkmetJ olf":C'r. roay Mlbj~, cw board Member 10
4itqlllUn'ltlotl. IbfRbyplOhlbltintt WI mtmbC"t frornpartlcip.llac iA u'b.eq\lt:W. ptDCftdI:l&J on Ute UK.
"~/.l*
04-)..oo!M Noller ofllurinc.
Paat '"
Cnltulr.,,1 SolID"
C,..",lh .. ,tftUlllfnrlnr-..... rd
fOO 4" A\t .. c, Sull, "'0. Sunk. WI. 'II'"
Ttl C:N);tat.16U rn (Jot\ lIt.2$13
I
I
•
-
, ,
) • ,
• 1
I • ..
II
11
OJ ..
" " 11
" " 20
" " lJ
" " ,.
17
" 29
lO
" Jl
13
" " " " 11
" 40
.\
n
4) .. ., ..
41
•• ..
"
o o
The pwpcso of the prehurina conference is Ipeclfied In the Dollrd', Rules ofPracllec and
Procedure. codified al WAC 242.02·550. In panitul,u, the: Donrd ..... ill review the legal
iuueI poled In tile PFR. In sddidon. the pmla should be prcpillcd 10 discuss the gcner.l
nArutc of any dispositive motions thllt they intend 10 file. tr no diJpolitivc motions DIC
antitiPlted, the cue 5thet.lulc Rill)' be modified ICcoldingly. nle 80ud may limit the
filing of dispositive motion. to questions rcgllrdin& the Do3l'd "jurisdiction.
Dy Tuesday Fcbru,ry t" 2004, the Petitioner is directed 10 rubmillo the Ikwd. with.
copy to the City, • re-t:t.lcmeol or Ltga' IUUH . The rc·lUlcmcnt of Icpl iuucs .hall
spcciry wbich uqjfi; Moyisi ons of the cballenged action IIrC nol in tomplianc:c with
,,'bicb fpC'CjfiC .es1l0u(.) of the Gruwth Management Act. Clilipler 36.70A RCW.
Pctiuoner i. directed to the "'Gu!dclincs for Fnunin, Lepllssuca" which II appended 10
this notice .
Please clR(ully review the Tentative Schedule. Finlll dudllnu for .ubmining the
motion. and brice. will be established _t the picheari:lS conferencc. bASed on thi1
IChccMe. Followin,lhc prthearinS conference. the Uoll'd will i11\:C a Preheuios Older
(PHO) that conwns the final deadlines and the Statement ofJJ5uCI.
The Record Delow
llCW 36.70A..29O(4) requires the Bow 10 base it. decision un the record tJcvdopctJ
below. in this .QSe. by the City of Renton . This record ma), be supplemented with
addition.1 aidence if the Board determines th~ lupplemental evidence is nIXcullry or or
substantial udstmcc to the Boud in reaching its decision.
Punwlntlo WAC 242·02·520. the City is required to prepare In Index within 30 dll),' of
service orlhc PFR. thatli.ts all docwncnlJ conshlefl:d b)' the City in taking the challcnl(w
actioa. ExIt dOtUment included in the Index should be given n uniquo number (or
Klcnrifieatinn PW-POsc.J and to avoid dupliulion.
Filinll exhibit.
Oaly the exhibits rtrmnced in motions :&nd prchwin, brier. ShAll bo nlcd with tho
Doar.J. Exhibits rnu.sz bc' auached to the brief in which they are referenced . Exhibits
prevfoualy submitted with II brief need nOl lie resubmitted, as long as the subsequent
brietina rtfcrrinllO .uch exhibits specific.lI), identifies the brier 10 which the c:xhi bits
WCfe originall)' auatb(d,
UeWng on tho Meri"
The Boud has scheduled lhe hearing on Ihc merits ortbe PFR on Thllrlday, JUDe 3,
2004, at Ibr Board', omen. Suite 1 .. 70 .
' .... ',.ll1CU
04-).0())4 Notice oflleaMl ,.,.419 C«.Ir.1 "C'" S.nd
(;u'01111ot"'IIIll,ntlla,lnr-Do.rd
\100 ~ "U"'. SIIlt,lU'. ~.rtr •• W.\ 911,4
TIL ilK) lU·J6U .'11 nN) )19·U"
"---
i
I
I
-
0
•
•
•
I ,
)
° ,
• , • • 10
" " Il
" " " 17 ..
I.
'0
" 22
" " " " " 21
" )0
" " II
" II
" 17
1I ,. ..
" " " ..
0' 0'
" ..
" '0
•
,
o I o
I ~1YIu!~('W.20 and Order
The. Dou\l',"'JnaJ Decision and 6rocr (FDO) In NjdlouOll v. CIty of Rmlon (Cue No.
04·J.(l()04) II due 10 be iuued no)1l1Cr than Tuudl Y July 10.2004.
&JIC 1Q htlend or PaniciD;tc
A party who fall. to attend or P~iciP.tc in any hearinl or other .lIIgc orthe adjudicative
procc:alings berl.lTC !he Board in ibis case may be held in dcf.uh And the: cue dismiued
PW'luan1l0 WAC 242-02·710. !
I •
The paniel ate reminded abo t the requimnetltl of WAC 242"()2·IJO rcguding
c:ommunic.al.iolU .. ith tho Boud.. The, only pmnlssib lc a ptJrl~ conl:a.cll with the Board
&reOft pwelyproceduraJ orlogisw:ai mallen..
:
So ORDERED thi.l-day orFe~.lOO4 .
CENTRAL PUOET SOUND OROwnl MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD
""--.1. XIOl
Mo).()0G4 Notkt: orH~ PI,. )19
o •
I
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
•
I
""".
Druce C. Laing. FAler
l~idinl Officer
Cllllni r.l~ Send
C,...,,, Mt.l&fllltlilln ••• ,t ... ,.. 'f(I." "'.aI, 5.1" 2t10" Stln.k, "" til"
Ttl {lot} ,.,.UUt'u (l06)"J.Un
! ,
I
•
•
I , ,
• ,
6
7 • • I.
II
Il
Il ..
U
" 17
II
" ,.
" II ,
" " I.
17
11
" ,.
]I
II
n
" " " " II
" .. ..
" " .. . , .,
'7 .. .. ,.
_.
INTEIU'RETER REQUEST
CPSOMHB Cas, No. 04·J·(}()fX
Nicholson y, CI't)' of Renton
1 request tbl\l an inlerpmc:r be present as rallows (Plwe circle U .PPfOpri.tC):
•
I. timiltd EnJlish-speWoJ .bility. My primary l:lI1guagc is n::..:::;:-.::==,
(Indlcale language)
2. Hcarln, impaired.
DOled this __ <loy or _____ ~.lOCJ.l.
51811"""':
pany
CtDual Pu&et Souad Growth MID'lement lIunDa' Bond
900 Fourtb A\'t'Que .. SuU.l410
rfll!JlM-A JOOf
04·l~ NOlice orllwiAJ
'Irt tw'9
Suttle. \VA 98164
Crill'" h,tl SO .... d
c,. .. " MIOltUrlflllllllrl." aunt
'00.-"\I"", Salte 147Q,Sclt1If, WA 911'-4
TtL (1U,)I).UU Fu (JWI )INSII
I
!
I
I
I ·1
I
I
•
,
1 ,
] • , , ,
• • I.
II
" 13 ..
" " " ..
I.
2.
21
" 2) ,.
" " " 28 ,.
].
" " " " " 16
)7
]I
" •• ..
" " .. . , ..
" .. .. ,.
-
I.
II.
111.
IV.
V.
VI.
VIL
vn .
VIII.
IX .
. ,' .,
0
• • • . , ..
•
.,
•
• ,
P\ '""
PREJlEARING CONFERENCE AGENDA
CPSGMIIB CAs, No . OM.()O(H
Nlrholtoll v. City 0/ R"ntolt
Introduction o(Board Mcmba'{s) and patd"
Status ofSC1t1emoll OilCuuions 2nd Sdtlcrnml Options
DrierRtvi~'orOptionJ and RC\iew Paranu:tcn
A. Dircc1 Review by Superior Court
B. Sculement ExtenSions
C. Presumption of Validity, BurdO! ofProorand Standard o(llcvicw
D. luuCl U St2ttd in PFR or u Ral.lc4 in PrchearinS Order
RC'Cord Below
A.lndex
B. Motions to Supplemcut
Dispositive. Motions· Tlmcb .ell, Standi", and lunsdictio n.
Sehedulin& (lee at1&Chtd Tentative Schedule)
A. Molions filiug deadline
I. DilpOlltive (irpenniltcd)
2. To Supplement the Rf:'tord • Include proposed c:xhibits
D, Briefs fililla IIlld ublbilJ filing datJllnc
C. Senlemeat extension deadline •
D. Hearing on the Meritt date
E. Final Decision and Order date
Review ofLegalluuc:s
A.luucs &om PFR CUt No. 04 ·).()()04
n . DilCusdon of f'IOt.entill jurisdictional Wues., ifany.
C. DiscussinG ofP:O"ible restatement of WUCi, if any.
Hearina Location lind Fonnat •
OtherMaum
Adjournment ('pproximately al 12:00 p.m.)
'""",,1. XII>I
1M·).()004 foiobCO orllanq Ctttftsl I'lol'f.5el1ld
hie 119 C~fII MUII".., .. I Jltul1rt a .. ,.,
toO 4-A'llIu" S;Jlt 14'0. Sdt1W,. WA "IM
Till. U .. , 31901t:) ru (lOt) J.,I.olSh
-•
• , , ,
! • 1
• I
I ,
) • ,
• 7 • • I.
II
" " ..
" ..
17
" " '" " " 2J
" 2j
" " " ,.
'" " " " " " " )7
" " " ..
" 4) ..
" •• " .. ..
"
o o
Slate orWuhin&IOn
Celllral PU8r:t Sound Growth Mallllgcment H('urin~ Doard
Guidelines (or Fmminc LeSlIllssues
• A legal iuuc should be Italed in the (orm of. question thai the D031d call IUIIWet
''yes'' U( "no".
• A legal iULIe i. 4R allegation thai II local government (city or tounty) action ellher
/ai/$ to comply with specific ,oals IU1dfor requirements of the Cirowlh Manatemcnt
Act (OMA). the Shoreline Management (SMA) or Stale EnviroM1tnllal Policy Act
(SEPA) Ca'\ to GMA and SMA aClions) or Is jncomutmt with lOme GMA-adoptcd
tnl'l(:tmcnl. such as counlywidc rl:lnning polities, II comprchcwiYc phmo or II
development regulation .
• A Icgal islue should cite which spccjnc provisions orme local government action arc
aUeled nol to comply with which saccjfic: !!myi5irlO'5 of which slfttule; or which
mecjfie provisioDs or. local govemment action are inconsistent with ~m.m.w.n1C
rl2vjliQIlI orwhlch GMA·!adoptc:d enactment,
• A legal imlc may include. phraJe thnI brieOy identiflea the rt:lIOn rOt the allegation
or noncompliance and/or iueonliS1clIey. Howeyet, Icgal issue statement' ,hould
gcnmdly be brier. devoid of argument or cyidmee. both ofwbieh will be presented
by the rapective purties in the wrillen brief. and dunn! nral argument At the hcnring
on the mentJ.
ExAIDpI"
I. Did Ihe CilJ/Ctlllflry Qioprllm of lis compTthenJlw plan fgJl to caMply wllh Ihe
tqlllrmtell/J tI/ RCW J4. 10A,.IiD b«IIUII It did IIOt pro.,IJt fo, tll,ly a"d con tinuous
,ulJlle panlclpllllDlr 7
1. Don TNl1IJlona#o" Pofie, T·1 ollllt CltylCQunty CQmprtht,.sI,~ Pfall IQIIIO
ctl",pl:! "It" tlte ",ulume"ls D/ HeW J4.'OA.070(6) IJ«IIUst It dOd IIQ' Include an
.,.41p~ "/Iulldilll copdllll17
J. l.lAltd Usc PtIIlC}' LU·}OI tllllrl! Cil)'ICounty Compnlrtnslrr Plan Intonsls"'"
1I1111r County-wldt Plllnn/f'R 'tl/ldt. fepps) btclluse II pm~ntJ tire City Irom
IIccom",odtJlbtt the IH'PultJIlon ("'fa ,,/loccttd by CI'P FW-117
4. Don tht CIt)'/County Comprtlr,ns/w PIon 11111 to comply wllh RCW
J6.7DA.a70(prtll".bl,) betouse tM LQIJJ Use F.ltmrlll 11I11I(oll"','('nl will, Ihr lIomlng
Elemtnt7
,,._,J,~
()4.J.0004 Nolkc oflfurill,
h .... Ct",r.a'·cdSeud
Gr ... ,11 ~""'Irmrllliitl "II' IIlIIIni
"JoQ~. AmlUf, bll. :41(1, $nhle, WA .. ".
TrL (10.)."".:11015 Fu (2(\6)' .... 2~.
•
•
, ,
I • , ,
7 ,
• 10
" II
Il ,.
" 16
17
II ." " " n
2l
" " " 17
" " " 1I
II
II
" lS
" 17
" " •• " ., ., .. ., .. ., ., .. ,.
,
o o
Tt:.~T AT'VY. SClu:nUl.y.
CPSGMlln C.Sf! Nil. o-/#J·OOOf -Nicboll"" ,. CIf), III Rn""".
do(uhJmu mUll be nlcd with tbe: Doard (OIiC orl£lnal plus four II:Opta on thrH"-hok
plUlcbrd paper aad t'Ol'lrd bad.-ID-blltk) ull. copy un-cd upoo tbe otber piny by
<4 :00 olbcrwbe lIotcd.
Mon.
Tue. F~b
Mon. feb. 23. 2004
Mon. Feb. 23, 2004
Moa. Mar. 1, 2004
Mon. Mill' 15.2004
Mun. Milt. 29, 2004
Mon. Apr, S. 2004
MOD. Apr. 19,2004
Man. MlyJ.2004 .
Mon, May 17. 2004
Mon. M.y 24. 2004
Thur. MIlY 27, 2004
11Iar. JUGe 3,2004
Doard Nacke orllnrlolluuc:d
De.adline (or Petitioner 10 Submit ltc-Statement of Letalluuu
Deadline (or RCApOnderll', .ndelt (original plus one copy)
Prtburiol: Coo(crrnct: 10:00 a.m.. Bond', omen. SuUt:
1410'
Board Preheatla&: ,)rdrr due
Deadline (or Motions' and Memoranda in Suppru1 (with
clblhlll)
Deadline: (or Response to MOlions (wltb nblblts)
Deadline (or Rc:buttalto Response to Mntion. (nrlinsul)
DOlrd Order 00 MoOoD. due
Deadline: (or Petitioner's Prchcarina Bricr(wltb tXblblts)
Deadline for Respondent' .. J'reMaring Hri,:J(",'tb ubJbltJ)
Dealliine (M Petitioner', Reply Brief (option.3~
Oeadline for Requrstmg Settlement El"tenslon
HrariD, OD Menu or PeUUoa: to:oo un. -11:30 p.rn.-
Doud', Omcts, Sofie 14'0
'lbe Doard'. ofTltu IJt 1oc.1Ci!.t900 46 A~, SlIilr 1~10, StletJe .
, DoIh d"podtiwo motlGlll &lid rmlkQ 10 lUJIPltmot lbe rtc-ri
• St-r: RCW J6.70A.J00(l).
",.,..". ,..."
04·).000& Noti:e OCllt.lMa
h1,919
-
Cftttm 'uC"!teM4 c:,....,. ~I ... ltr.ulll~riafl , ... d
'!lOll ... A ........ S .. I1.1"0. So!:"'. "'A. t .. ,",
Tc\. (!IMJ l.,.!U5 ru (la.) nt·nu
•
•
o
CPSGMIID Calc No. (U.].()Oo.&
BNti Nlrhoirolt ... City 01 Rtntoff
DECLARATION 0'" SERVICE:
I certify that I mailed ~ topy orthc Notlcc of lIt.lrloR to the persons a.nd nddrc!JC3 listed tic/con. poSI_ae p!'tpaid, in IllXcplaclc (or Uniled Sllles mail at Scalilc. Washington. on February 1.100.t
S;I!Jl«l: Jl!rv.£,J.4 (h )
Br.ad Nicholson
2300 NE 28111 Street
RcnlOn, WA 9&056
Oaten O. Shul"
Pc:rltins Coit
1201 Third AlIenuc,. Suile 4800
Startle, WA 9810)
If, (RtllfOll) flj·1JS-l'7A fiu 411.1J1-1114
Ltwtencc \V~n
W~i BIlbc:r & Fontes. PS
P.O. Soli: 626
Renton. WA 98051
_ Iii tw'I<t
,
,
I
,
I
!
!
•
J?c:bnI:u')l 2. 2004
MontJJy. 7:30 p.rn.
CAU. TO ORDER
ROLLCALLm'
COUNCILMEMUERS
CITY STA~'Y IN
A TT~:NDANCE
AOMINI~"HATIVE
RIWOKT
CONSI-:NT AGENDA
Council M~llnl Mjnul~$ ur '."uny 26. 2004
Leg.l: Pc.illon for Review It!
Doeingl'ropeny. Cenlral Pugel
Sound Orowth Manllgemcnl
ilurinS' Boord (NichotJOtl)
kO}'\'\\
Oe\'CIO(1menl Services:
NIlIIOIlAI EI«lrk Code (2002)
Ador:1on
rill: Sunnybrook. S 381h a &.
Smithers Aile S, F'P-C)·I03
•
"
R~i'ITON CITY COUNCIL
Regullt Meetin,
MINlITCS
•
Council Dumber.
Kenlon City HaJl
~byor Kllhy KwU:er·W'lte!u led the 1'Ied,e of Allc:gj ~nce 10 the nJillnd
called dlt rotClllIg or the RenlOiI City Couf)(ilIO orde,.
DON (jENSSON. Council Prelidc:nl: MARCIE l'ALMER; TERRI BRIERE:
DENIS LAW: DAN CLAWSON: TONI NELSON: RANDY CORMAN .
KATIIY KEOlKER·WIIEf:.U!.R. Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chler
Adminhlrllj\'c OffICer; RUSSIiLL WILSON. Auis'.\m CilY Anomey:
nONNIe WALTON. Cily Ocrk: GREGO ZIMMERMAN.
Planninr/llulldinVlJublic WOC'h AdminiSinlor; NEtl.. WATTS, Oc,"cloprn.=nl
Services 1)lr«IOI'; I>EREK TODD, Auiilanllo the CAD; DEPtnY aliEf
KEVIN MIJ.OSl!VICIt. PoIK~ [k~n~nl.
Chief AiJnunislnli\·e OHicer b)' Covin&loo n:yicw~ a v.Tinen adminisl11lth'e
rrpon slimmariling Ih~ Cily's fe«1\1 pro&less IO'A1Irds go.U1lnd wuk
progrlms adopced " pan or ilS bulincu plan (or 2004 and beyond. hema noIN
Included:
• Altne Slm', Club grand openln& IIlI wc.'d:.lhc t"~lIy ,Jonlled 524 • .soo
10 c:ommunll)' Of£.nll.lliions. service groups. and nOIl'profil .gencies.
Including $1.500 to the Henion fire Dc(W1JOenI ror Ihc purch.ue ofillto);e
deleclors and SI,500 10 Ille Kenlon I'olicc tkp::mmenl ror cmergenc)'
Jervices (or domullc ... iolencc victims.
• Rc.ideRIS new to Renlon n:«h·c A New Resident ~d.e1lhat (OI\l:loinl
infomution highlighling lhe different Jertlcel .... allabk in the Cit)'. These
p;lckcts Ire nuUcd I' :lC.W n:sidentl wtcll)'. U$ini mailing lilts obuined
(rom Kin& Counl), r, onb of templCIN moftg.ge lnIlUKllons.
• The Renton Munldp.:al Ans t.'onvniuioo will hold iu MC'CI the Anill
R.'Ccplion. (Of anbl Liu howr,. in the lobby of ClircO TlllUltc on Fridl),.
Ptbruary 6th. from 6:30 to 7:30 p.nL
hems on the conscnt • .:eOOI are .d~N b)' one mo4ion ""'hich follOWI the
Ullin,.
Approval uf Council mce tin, minutes or bnw')' 26.. 2004 . Council concur.
at)' Orr); .ubmitlrd I'elil;on (Of Review filed before the Cent ... 1 I"lICCt Sound
Oro'A1h M.n<lgemcntlle&linGs 1I000N by UI'Jd Nicholson. 2JOO Nl! 281h Sr ..
Renlon, 980'6, rcqnellin& Ihal Rcnlon', development reguillions. tonin, rrup,
IrwJ onJinlntts. rrlatcd 10 1Jw: Doe;n, p~rty retooe action, cumpJy with Ihe
Orowlh Mlnatcmcnl Act. Rerrr 10 Cily AIlOOlCY.
DevclO(lmcnl Stnolcc, Divilion recommended adoption or lhe 2002 Nation .. !
e!eclric Code. wilh City . ttcntcn an~menll . Refer to rlilnDin~ aOO
DcyrJopmeOl Conynlll<g.
Dcvclopmenl Se",lces DI"'ilion recommended IIPProV;!.!. ..,.·ilh condhlool. u( the
Sllnnybrook Finall'lat; I U slnGIe·fllmily lOll on 3'.02 Kle' locllted OIt S. 38th
Ct. and Smithers Aw:. S . (f1'.Gl·IOl). Cooncil concur. (Sec patlc 16 for
resolllcion.)
•
•
CITY pt' R~:NTON COUNCil. hGt:NOA 1111 .1,
SUHMmlNG DATA: r-oR AGENDA OF: fcbrulll')' 2. 2004
OepcIOivlDo:mL. AJLSlCity elcrt;.
AGENDA STATUS: Stafr ConlncL •• Bonnie Wallon
Conscnt ......•.. XX
SUBJECT: fJublic Henring .•
Petition (or Review befon: the Central Pugcl Sound Growth Correspondence ••
,..bmagcmc:nl Bearings Board· Bold Nicholson. Petitioner v. Ordin:&ncc .••
City of Renton. Respondent,lInd The DOting Comp:1nY, RC:lolution •••
Proponent Old Busincss. ......
New Dwlne!s ......
Study Session ....
EXIUBITS ; Other ....
Pelition (or Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVAWi:
Refer to City Allomey
Legal Oct .....
Finance pt. ...
Olher ...........
~ ~
, .
• . •
SUMMARY OF ACTION;
Petition (or Review fHnI before: the Cc:ntr.l.1 PugC:1 Sound Growth Mannfcmcn, Hearings Do:ml by Orad
Nicholson. 2300 NE 28th 51.. Renton. 980S6. n:qut!ting Ihal the City 0 Renton', development
regulation., wning map, and ordinances tomply wilh the Growth Management Act. This petition n::gnrdJ
the City's ruaning action (lUA..Q2~ 141) on November 24. 2003. n::lnted 10 ahc 2BO·acre pmel or Innd
owned by1he Doeing Comp3nY .
.
" ". ,
•
•
•
1
2 ,
•
5
,
,
•
• ,.
11
12
13 ..
15
1G
11 .. ..
2.
o
In the ~tter concerning purported
c~rehen.Jvo pl.nnJn~. development
regulation., and .onin, enactmenta
and amendment. ot the CIty ot Renton,
, , , , ,
Brael "lobol.OD, •
Dt Renton,
c.t tben of the City)
Petitioner.
v.
, , , , ,
City of •• atoa, • State
HunJcJ~l CorporatIon,
ot H'uhIngton ) ,
Reopondent.
The aoalag eo.pany. ownIng and
operating a ~rcJ.l airplane
~nut.cturJng plant on land aoned
IndunrJal Heavy In the CHy ot
Renton,
, , , , , , , , ,
Propene" t • ) ---------------------,
CilY Of RENTON
1:1'O,.hI.
JAN 2 2 21l{)4
RECENEO
CITY ClERK'S OffICE
C ... llo . 04--:'-0004-
PflTITION FOR R£VIEN
21 eoNI8 NOW, the Petitioner, DraeS Nlchohcn by and through hi. own IIOtion, for
22 want of c~nlty and con.intoncy, health, •• (ety, general welfaro, eorality,
2] economic and aociat environmental quality, and lor want of fultill~nt ot the
24 PUrpol •• and objectivea, common 90a1., and apecitic directive. ot tho LaWI ot
l5 the State ot w •• hington and ita Orowth Manag!ment Act (aKAl (the Ictl,
Petition tor Review· 1
• . .' ~,
•
~a4 IIJdIolHll'l
2100 N ••• z,'n •
• .n~an . ~. "05'
•
'.": ,.
~:. .... o
1 00 .. hueby petition, and requuta review and an order and relid in favor ot
1 the a~tbority of the Qr~tb Management Act and the State Environmental ~liey
• Act, and according to ~wa of the atate of Wa.hington and according to it.
5 AdII.inhtration and Conotitution, aggr.laved by the reopondenta and tho threat
, tbey po.. to the public intereat and ita environ~ent, through their act. each
.,. o( th .... and allege. the (ollowing !
•
•
10
11
u
"
"
>0
I. IHTRODUCTIOtf
1 .0 Thi. petition i. not related to an appeal of a project Action. It io a
petition requesting that City of Renton ~evelopment regulations, &on1"9 ~P,
and ordinance. ~ly with tho OHA. Thi. petitIon concerne itaelf with a
reaon.ing actlon deaignated LUA'03-141, CPA, R, BIS by the City of Ranton
Cclty)
1.1 ordinary Renton Citizan. have no preference for a large ocale shopping
center for City 90Yernmcnt to achievft a greatar ahare of e.le. tax revenue,
along with aorvice related emplor-ent, and they are not legitimate objective.
o! the act c &Oeing ha. made no decialon to leave the aite according to the
facta of record. Proponent ~anta to reaone [or purpoae of _tockholder value.
The [acta are that the objective. that the City and Proponent have identified
to adopt the following ordinancea ~re not compliant with the apacific
Objectivas of the OMAI
1.2 Tha need for thl. petilion ari_e_ [rom the City o[ Renton adoption of
ordJD4Ince_ • 5026, • 5031, • 5028, '5029, '5010, 1S0ll. 1S0n, 1S0ll, ISOH,
'SOll, '50lt, and ro_olution • lG" dated Hove~r 24, 3001 by the Menton
Petition for Review -2
,
_1",_
,
.s.d IfJchoJ.on .:uo, N ••• "'.c.
1I."rOll, It ... 'filS'
1 !i".
2 Tho revJow cOfMlltteo tJndingll, ncoen:r.endltionl, and .1nut" and IUllllWlry ot
" propoI" a ndulgnatlon of the Cit.y'. lind ula up and a propo .. l tor a
5 ro&ono and the nece •• ary coda ch.ngo. and develop.ent revulatione that would
, be required or tho ar.a generally 1n the center area of Ronton, along Cedar
7 river and Lako WI.hlngton and purportedly ln order to acco-plioh tho
\0 or the proparty. Such het. rain the quutlonl
11 Why mUlt proponent roaone it. preaent continuing operationa thlt are
13 no prerorred alternatlvel and When it J. contrary to tho city'. comprehanalve
14 plan, public MOralo, goneral vel tare, and preo.nt clrcumatancea7
15 There Jo abundlnt logal authorit~ available that juatifiao invalidatlon ot
l' thi. ruon ••
17 1.3 The City and the proponent allege that they have been working tor up to a
11 year to analy .. e the impacto trom tho four alternative oconlrl0 that had, at
19 a previoua tlM, no preferred alternative. and wore only for purpo .. of
20 conoid.ratlon of the potential ot the property relevant to thio .ppeal. They
21 hIve now adopted a -hybrid-plan that include_ approved optiona tor a 1arge-
22 .elle retail ,hopping centor and hlgh lntenllty re.Jdential ule. All of thele
2) actiono have been pertol"llled concurrent with public nlH.e tor Boeing ,Jobo.
24 multi-blllloD. of doll.ro In Stat. legl.1atlon .nd t •• value •• incentivea to
2S p~te thi. type of indu.trial actlvlty, publicity and olgn.go ln the City.
PetitIon for Revlow • )
• ~-,,-, ..
.,..d IfIC'bol_
~JOCI If.C.II'n •
.... tOll. fl •• flO"
•
o o
1 and. genora1 dhct:.ntont and di .. ppoJntlllent in tho appearance of the
1 agtee.auta and tboir effecta Qn ordinary citizen •• while new progr.~ and
5 ~r.h.n.iv. Plan econ~lc d.v.lo~nt ole.ent. It to clear that tho
, propo •• l alao attel!lpta to cirCUlWYent .. ndAtOry providon. and excludvo
7 objective. ot tho GMA. Tho context of the iMplication. have been diacu •• ed to
• ... great degree In inner circl •• , and without baing fairly recorded, and
, portand the •• act ton. tran.tora tho proponent from an -.ircraft ~nuf.ctur.r~
10 to ... ·~.t.m. integrator-with ·con.oIld_ted oporation.-, and tho City into ...
11 ~lxed u •• • ·urban center-with ... -hybrid-largo .cale retail ahopping
12 center. Moat all of which pre_cnt ... very bleak outlook for Renton and State
13 citisen., white and blue collar alike, that are educated and work and rely
14 upon their j:lbe in induatry and INInufacturing [or their liveUhoocla. Renton
15 hae .. lvay. been conddered a tovn ot hard working Alnericana and atill h. It
lC ia undhputed tact th.t.t ~eae theories .nd objectivu ot the proponent and
17 City politicians are conceived by r.helr unilateral, individual benefite and
1. objective •• and their .trategy to incre .. e .toekholder value and oaleo tox
l' revenu •• And all deetined to reault in lover atandArde ot livin9, and
20 deereeaed cepacity tor Weehington end aenton eitJtenry. Renton politiciane
21 have done nothing to aerY. the Objectlve~ and purpolea ot atatutory
22 authority, while cititenry hae expre •• ed their convictiona with A three point
2) two bIllion dollar tax incentive. Potitioner eU9geated that a compro.lee be
24 adopted, uti1itlng a legal, intardlaclplinary procca., auetaining oIl ot the
25 alternative. but aueh eugge.tion ha. been Ignored, In tact, they have
Petition tor Review· 4 .
.,. ... d MJo:hoJIfCIn
;l'JOO N ••• "'Sf . • .n!on. w •• "Ofl
4 plan 1n accordance with 3G,70A.130(1) ta) Ib) RCW, and vhi)e violatl.ng internal
5 condnency require_nu of 315.70",010 ReM .
G That t. claarly erronooua, a ground acceptabhl to invalidation punuant to
• element are attached herewith) It 1a a wdl known fact that P.enton cit.hena
, are maJnly working cia •• people. that want to be productive and worklng. h •• d
10 induatrially ~on.d land 1n the city for pU~ae of productive output and
11 aocial and envJro~ntal quality. while their value. and convictiona aro
l' given to the induatrJal and m.nufacturJng hi.to~ of Renton incluaive of
13 their cOllmOn gods in accordance w!th lnatnllnenta of public policy outlined
14 herewith. Deforence ahauld be foregone beeau .. the actlona would thwart
1~ log1tl .. te atatutory objective •• Boeing property at 1.auo here i_ aoned
11 1.4 Petitionar appeared. appealing tor logic and re •• on to be di.C'Ue.ed and
11 dhcloaed rolating the .. luuea. but tho City and PropOnent _till proceed
l' with the pruee •• upon the unjuatlflablo goat_ of the proponent. Petitioner
20 care. about the City of Renton, Petitioner aleo made hb roquoat clean to
21 make further amendment_ to the 2003 comprehenalve plan and coda and
22 devol~nt ragulatlon_ amendment. that at pro_ent and aa aubmltted are not
23 in complianco vith applicable lawi. Btaff, Planning ~l._ion, COuneil, and
24 Proponent have atlll ignored petitionerl juat and legal requeat •.
25 1.5 Petitionor appealed to tho City hearing examiner, according to City Code.
Petition for Review -5
", ,.
aId HJcIloJ_
~Je(J If._,:".' . • ~ron, _ •. "OS,
o o
1 The &llaquar:y of tho impAct at.tement h nQW at l .. ue before that ottic. and
1 \lnfini.hed at chi. tl~. An onv l ronm4ntal impact .tatcment and ita review
• proc ••• ahculd be c~l.t.d pri or to the adoption of related rogulatlona and
5 ol'dlnanc ••. Tho facta that. are contdned therein are mtC" ••• ry fectll to
6 enlible. review by thh bo.trd, and without which, rovie'" by t)lt. board &IV
• 1.6 aeview and ~nd=ent and/or rover •• l t. required or tho purport ~d code
10 tee ordinance •• public particJpation rwquirementa. capital bdlitiu
11 alenent. and tran.portation pl.~ing in order to achieve COMpliance with tho
12 act. Tho following reaulta l
13
II. JftISDICTIolf.un ITANDlHO
15 1.1 Thh Board h .. jurhdlc:tlon bee_un 16 . "lOA . '90 RCW cOII'IIIIOnly known •• the
16 Growth IUnage=ent Act euthorll •• petitional' to requeat review of
17 caeprehenaive plana .nd aoning and development regulationa ereated and
1. ordained by the City ot Renton local i Jriedletlon through Petition for Roview
lJ at thlo boud.
lO 1.1 Potitloner Brado H.iehoiaon preaented hllUelt at the City of Renton publlc
21 h.aring held (':1 the _tten that are tho aubjeet ot thb request punctuallYI
22 roqueated to beCOlllO a party ot record at ''Il10. participated orally .nd In
2) wr.iting for aamo, and thoreforo properly ha. atandlng to requeat review
24 punuJlnt to lI5 .70A.21012} ,bl ReN .
25 Such participation .in tho proceeding. that lead up to tho purported adoptIon
Petition for Reviow • ,
-•
orotd MichoJMJn .uoo " .•. ,.'n. aCQCon. w.. "0"
o
•
1 or carta1n or~ln.nc ••• plana, and r ~gul.tlo". of the City DC Aonton, raterred
1 Renton and thenton h. prolM'rly }l" n'lIdjng to uk. thb reQ1.1 .. t .
4 :1.1 In .ddl ~Jon to auoh proper participation and .tanding, petitloM r Brad
5 Nichol.on participated by pt •• anting lottara and appeal. prior to the
, d •• dlin •• pr •• cribod by the City and .ddr •••• d according to their
7 .pacification., (copt .. have boon incorporated lnco the lUG Und draft and
• public record of tha procuc\!nga, "a1 proprht ely rat-Ing I.au .. of cone.m
t that ate properly betore thh board and in the pdor proceeding. lucUD!I liP
10 to tho unhwt u. ordinanc .. that au at i .. utl in thh apped . The rupon •••
11 provided t o .!.Ioh participation w •• not guided by the apacitlc and .. clualva
12 SINh of tho act but rather by the apecHic gOflh of the proponent, and City
11 gOll. thlt Ire outside of the Ict Jn disregard of and without bar.ony wJth
14 the law. thlt are applicable to their proposal . The i.sues her. were properly
15 raJ sed and were not addresled by the proponent, the City, ~r in the
lG proceeding •• Again, petitioner Brad Nichol.on ha., by right and a. a ~.tt.r
1'7 of hw, lawful .tanding to lU'ke thia req\laat . .
11 2 .4 1G.?O~.2'OI2) Rew requires req\lelt. of thl. nature to be .. de witbin a
a period of .txty day. trom the time the di.puted plan., codel , or developaent
20 regulation. are adopted or enlcted. Thi. requeat is .. de within that
21 tirnofnmo and therel'oro thia peUtion h .. been fUod In I thady .. Mer and
II tharefore it Ja properly bofore t..hh Board and 11 aubject to review under the
II ruleD of title 2U tl.AC , title lU WAC, and other accord.1n9 to ,,~. bond.
l4 2 .5 The ordinance. and regulation. and code. at i •• ue in the above captioned
25 c .. e concern. property that fa I t-cated in the City of Renton, County of JUng,
rDtitioD for Review -1 a,..d W'c:IIoJ_ ZJCO 1I ••• J,'.r.
"-'lton, ... "It"
Q
1 .U and both in tho Stau ot wuhlngton. and therefor. aC'C'ordiflJ to
1 l.1 Tho regulationl and t.luel here aro tho unlawful development regulationl,
• planning, zoning and cod •• o[ tho City of R~nton and/or tho aba.nec of luch
9 cod ••• planning, zoning, Ind d.v.lD~nt regulation. herewith. Tho unlawful
10 planning concerning tho t •• onine] of • Najor I r\d uatrJal Development and ... very
11 largo area of the Ci
12 quality water bodi •• aro nov at l •• uI and tho purported City Planning,
U davolopeent regulation., and dovelopcnont _oreomente !Wilt nov be rovenod
14 according to thi. roqu •• t and M •• hington t.w and 11 .70A .2.0(1) I.)RCW . Tho
15 city of Ronton and Stato of W •• hington and ita citizeno and thoir -oral. and
II thalr roquiro~3nt tor goneral vel tare coneiatent with adopted comprehen.ivo
11 plana, have v_lue. that are contrary to tho City and Proponent planning. a8
,. evidenced by recent legi.latlon. reoolutiono. and oocial and economio
l' demanda, and requirement. tor general aate~y. health and wolt.re, and publio
lO ~rala. 36,10 ReN, and Weohington Law effectively prohibita uncoordinated end
II unplanned growth and according to J6,70A.OlO RCW,
12 2 .1 All aUbjoct matter area. articulated within thl. petl~ion ero properly
13 within thh juriadiction.
1t 2 .' aelpondent the City at Renton i. a ~nlcipal corporation of the State of
2' wuhington and purporU to ordain cOlllPrehcnohe planning, development
p.tition tor Review ~ • IrAd IfJclIoJ_
J'JOO If ••• J'f'/lC.
II.nlGrl. "'A. 110"
•
• and applicable requira .. nt. of the State of Haabington tbAt are relevant to
1 .nd viII not fulfill the pu rpo •••• nd objectiv.a of Ha.ttngton Lav and er.
• Nldo in arbitrary dtuegard of Ha.hington lAw.
, 2 .' The OHA detinea development regulation vithin it. provl.loo., and the
10 ordlnancee brought to 1 .. 1.10 here .re according to that definition .
1:1 potition 1e vithin and ..,ill be argued ..,ithin the .ubauntial fora of •
l' requ •• t under Cr 5'(c) that there are now no genuine i •• ue. of .. tartal fact
14 that te n.c •••• ry for a dt.polition in thla c •• e that 1. in dlapute
15 and thlrefor. a ruling .hould be entarad upon the recnrd In favor of thta
U petition a •• IIIIItter 01' l.v,
11 TtIla petition 1. complete according to the rul.a properly ·prceulgated by thl.
11 bond .
It 2 .11 According to ",10A .O)O RCW , tho apacific 9~la of tho Growth ".na9~t
20 Act auat be uaed oxclu.ivaly when det.ralnlng the validity of conpreb.neivo
21 plana, xonlng, and dove1opfllOnt regulationa and ther.tofore dAclued by polley
22 or enacted by ordinance . Other go.l •• xclualvo to the other. and proponent'.
23 vlalon vere unlawfully u.ad tn edopting the purported plan •.
24 :1 .12 Cl.ne RCW atat.a,
25 -rulfill the aocl.l, eCOnoMic, and other r~quire~n t. of pre.ent end future
Petition for Review • ,
•
.nd IfJce.at_
;JJO, •••• ~.·.t .
• "'''_ .... ,.OH
o
1 gooanotionl ot Wuh1ngton cithen.·, and,
2 ~rulfl11 tho r •• ponaibll1ti •• ot .aeb 9oft,ratlon •• truate. of tho
,
• atating. -oil to the end of •• During the high.at atend.rda of environment lor
, accordance with tben purpoaea.
, Planning and policy muat proceed while .ffectuating tho intent and purpo ••
10 whlle attaining the hlgh.Dt atand.rda. The objectiv •• ot the Ict r.quir~ that
12 devole:patr.nta are rudy tor occupancy. That would not occur without a_ndmont
15 2.11 Tbh Bou'd h..1 the authority to qka blndh.., de cbratory ruUng_ and tbo
l' power to invalidate tho City ordinanc •• and development regulatIon. purluont
11 to and aceordlng to We.hIngton Law and ld.10A.210 RCW, and becau •• of tho
18 pertinent, tacto and lawa th&t would be viot atod by tho City ot aonton, tht.
U boIIrd will thonco bo required, a. a IIIIItter or law ud ract to do 10 and
20 coaploto jUltlce by entering an o~.r upon the public record in tho favor or
2) :UI. PUTlas arul \luoa
24 ).1 The petltiocer i. Brad Nichol.on and re.idel in tho City or Rnnton, and
25 COUDty of Xing. He hu an iotoroDt . in tho euc:c:euful futuro or hh City,
.otition for Roview -10 'r.4 HI~hoJ_
.uOD H ••• U'It •
• fft~. w ••• ,0"
o r-. , ;
2 done 10 at. "U tbllu ulevant to thh petition. IIh _ddr ... b
, 2100 N.B. :Uth fitrnt. Itenten. Wuhil)9ton "OSI .
, accordance with 242 ~02-110 WAC and oeher relevant atatuUl ••
7 ).1 Again. the City of Renton h .. wuhlngton munlcipal corporation ••
10 cOOipl1ant with (OMA, and (SBrA).
11 l.t Ordinancea adopted by City ~.t tultl11 the objectlv •• and pu~ •• of
13 .foulIIOntloned atatute. and .u other relevant providoR. of w •• hSngton t.lilll
11 and While e.erciaing their power. under the "' •• hington State conatitution.
14 Renton actlon. to amend planl mult be c~li.nt wJth 82.02 ReN. )&.70 ReM,
15 ",0. ReM. ,0 .• 1 ReN, 51.17 ReN, 42 .36 ReN, ".70~ ReM, and 41.21C RCWI
1& and the object tv •• and purpoln of IOKA) and u:srAI hu:ludve .
17 l .S The re.pondento, the City of Renton, (City) are in King COUnty. The city
1. Planning and developeent c~itte. decided th~ i.eu •• that are relevant to
l' this appeal, -.de their recommendation contrary to l.w aod While .itting In a
21 unaccompanied by detIDmlnat.lve Unding. of fa':t and concludon. of bw
22 fulUlling OAA objecti"'." and the City COI.Lneil enacted leghlation cont.rary
24 upon Improper procedure and ubitury and capricious and clearly orr«.eOU.
25 conltruct.lon ~f wa.hington Law heretofore en~rated and .a~. The tlctuAl
Petit.lon tor Review· 11
, 'I
" >
•
> > ,
Irad IflehaJ_
.1UO H ••• u'n. '.Qton, w •. "os.
o o
1 finding. ontorod upon the public rocord were generallsed ana in r •• lity
) evidence de.onatracing coopliance with the act, The City actcd upon J=proper
4 procedure and without tho required ,actual juatitlcatlon. "ithout. d10clo'UTO
5 at tho U'\lO Nltun ot the propoul. depriving tho petit.ioner and eithenlY at
& the required opportunity to participate in tho cre.tion of jUlt coepreheneive
7 planning and development regulation. and .~ndment. throughout the proc ••••••
• )., The Proponent plana to divide and rozone the land. that are tho aubjoct
, of ebh appeal without. tho actione being oubject to further public IIcNtiny
10 and .. ny ot tho controla that ahoultt be required by actiou of thb nature
11 under "uhington la ..... The City haD • hhtory at unlawfully approving
11 d •• 19" or acheme hore io tbi. action. Tho developecnt agreement. that the
14 City and the proponent propooe to enter into purport to violate the clear and
15 una.blguou. language at 51.11 RCW aubdivielon regulation. requiring public
l' parLlclpatloo and notice, and aleo, are unguided by the exclu.lve objective.
11 of the act.
II 3 .1 Unlawful ordinance. and regulationa unfavorable to Haehlngton law and
l' Renton and Waahin~ton citizenry bave now then enoued .
20 l.a Tbe City of Renton action. aro arbitrary or capricloue and erroneou.
21 according to Waabington ~tate LAw . The artlone taken by the Ronton City
l2 9ove~nt _re willful. arbitrary, clearly erroneoue, and unlawfully taken
23 for the epeclfic purpo.e of avoiding .poclfic •• cti~no of Wa.hlngton Law .
24 1.9 Therefore, while the land uee dec!.lona and regulationo relevant to the
25 above captioned cee. wero ~de within the juri.dlction of thl. board end oro
Petition for Review • 12
,
Ifr.d IflehoJ_
3100 " ••• ,,'u. ".ntm. W •• IIOU'
•
. ,
o
1 propClrly before and within tho JurlacUotion thh bond, it 18 Dubjlllct to
:3 revhw and Jnv.lid.tion by thh bou'd . Tho City'. addu .. h
1 Ronton CJ..ty lIan , 105' Oouth andy "'ay, Renton, w .. hington. 5180S'. Covn .. l
.. for City h Hr. Larry "'arran. addr."1 100 South 2 .... Ranton ., •• hington tl055 .
5 ).10 Tho Proponent lar the COIt'Iprohondve phn aUlonl!.ente and devillopr.-.ent
, reguhtlon ulCndlllenta 10 The Boeing Coqlany. The Boeing COfIi)eny bUad to
• propo .. l fulf'Jlh tho proper prDnll. or hgal. judicial, and at.tutory
, authority and objective •• Couna.l for proponent Hr . Galen O. Shuler appeared,
10 1'<IIpruontlng proponent . 1110 addr ... 18 1201 Third Avenue, .",ito 4800 , Suttle
11 ",uhington '8101 .
12 1.11 The CIty of Renton ""YOI' and City Attorney , and Counll81 for tlle
1] proponent have each prope~ly been .erved thi. petition, The o~lg1nal and
14 three copie. at thia petition are pre.ented to thi. board according to rule.
15 promulgated by thla bo&rd a nd defined by Wa.hington Adminlatrative Code
11 chapter 2n.
l' Affidavit. or certificate a o( .ervice are at~ached, included, or can be
11 provided heredter.
"
20 IV.8T"TUTOlY Gl00Mtl8 POI. a irlI ft
21 4 .1 The City planning and regulation. under chapter dl.cu •• ed her.tn are not
22 in compliance with the requirement. of 82 ,02 Rew , )1 ,'0 RCW, )1 ,'0" RCW or
2J '0 .48 RCW, 42 .JI ROW or aNendMOnta thereto , or chapter J'.04 ReN, and 4).21C
24 RCW, 51 .1' ReN •• it relate. to planD, development r&gUlation •• or amendMenta
25 thereto, adopted under J6 ,1O",040 RCW therelol
Petition for Review -1) .r_d .Jdool_
.IJ(lO •••• ZI·n .
• ."t_ ..... '''16
o o
1 •. 2 The City adoption at ordinanea. and relolution mentioned above are not in
2 OOMpliance yith the Orowth MAnaDement Act 10KA1 and ~he State Environmental
5 yithout following the collaborative procedural and lubet.ntive procel.e.
i required by the OMA and SBPA . The purported development regulation. and
• objeetiv.a, and yltbout being guided by lte own comprchen.ive plan a. ia
, required by the Orowth Hanage~nt Act . The Staff and Proponent delineated
10 that luch deelgnation wa. only under eonalderation, in r.ality it wal
11 lpe:ciUcally for pUrpol.r of an unjultHiable rezone undemlning objectiv .. at
12 the act . The City'. purported new Comprohenllve Plan containl particular
13 internal lnconailtonclol relating to ita provloully adopted c~rehonaivo
14 plan that c1rCUlNent or th"'lIrt luch plan, and luch ineondetenel •• are not
IS pereitted under the Ipec itic direct IV •• ot lG .70A.070 RCW .
l' aegional l •• uel affecting :ranlpOrtlitian, wator quality. indultry and ita
17 e.ploy=ent. IOCIII . economic, conetitutional requirement., development
18 roadinee. at the tSlIWI of occupancy. unllmbiguoua requirellllntll far fee or tax
10 othera, would ~ willfully dillrogarded . 'otitioner raia04 the.e i •• ue. In tho
21 proce •• e. leading up to the roaolutiona and ordinancel and development
22 agTe~nt. leading up to tho illuea heroin. Tho Orowth "'nagement Act va.
II theretotore not properl y Obaerved . A new ordinance purport. to oporate
2' developmoant regulation. of the City. 11Ie City ordinancea regarding impact tee
Petition tor Raviey • 14 'r.III' ,,'c-hoJ.a'I ~lGO N ••• U'U • • .neon. _ •• flOSI
3 and languago ot 83.03 and '6 .70A RCW an4 now need to be a~nded to be
J coaoplhnt \liLh the OroV':h ManagellOnt Act . Citbenry thought that tben woul4
• be a pedeatrian triendly and attractivo environment 1n tho area proponent
5 intendo to aurplu., no auch amendment to the Clty plana or codea tollowe4,
6 and inoufticient regul ationa protecting public intereat have followed.
7 •• , The purported allOndeenta .u.t include the eeat Available Science
8 according to J6 .10A.113 ROW for purpoa. of protecting the critical at •• a
, a4jacent to the alto , namely Cedar River and Lake Wa.bington that would be
11 that beat available .cience . The City'. ourface \later ordinanco and
13 dovo1o~nt regulationu ohould deaon.trate that al~ practical meano and
U _ .. urea to protect water quaUty will be undertaken and according to
14 4).31C RCW .
15 ,0.48 RCW 1. ot the UI!ICI aubject Ntter ne ceuary to effect.uau the
l' proviaiona without rendering any provi.lon aupertluoua and atateo l -It ia
17 declared to be the public policy of the atato at W •• bington to .. intain the
11 hlghen po .. ible nandarda to inure the purity of all waUra of t.he .tate
l' conoiatent witb public health and public enjoy.ant tbereot, tb. propagation
30 and protection ot wild lite, birda, game , flah and other aquatic lit., and
31 the indultrill development of the etlte, In4 to that end require the u.e of
33 III known available and rea.onab1e ~thoda by induatrle. and oebera to
•
3) prevent and control the pollution of the watera ot the atate of Waohlngton-.
34 It a1ao atatel, -Con.iatent with thi. policy, ehe atate of W.ahington will
35 exetcloe ita powers, .a tully .nd •• effectively aa poI.ible, to retain and
Petielon tor Review • 15
•
.... d II'JdloJ_
3JOO " ••• :t'.c.
"WIt"", It •• "OJ'
.,
! \
1 occur. high quality for all watere of the Gtato-. Thlo requirement ha. not
2 boen ob.arvad. but rather, an unlAwful and repugnAnt domonotratlon that tho
1 proposal might rooult in rewar pollutants entering wator. of tho Stato at
4 Washington and United Stato. 1. purported to be aubatituted tor cocpllanco,
5 ' •• a exhibit) Tho propoa.l i. unacca.panied by demenotration that tho intent
6 and purpo .. at the Clean Water Act U) U.O.C. C'haptel' 26 .ection 1:I!U)
1 articulating the requirement to oll~lnate pollution 1. obeerved . Thia board
8 ahould now require the City of Renton to ob.erve tho beat available acience
9 require .. nt, Include tho boat available aelonce In tho admlnlatrative rocord,
10 and adopt a .urfaeo ""ater ordinaneo that would in tact utilho all
11 practi:ablo mean. and mea.urea and all known methode to protect Dtate watora
12 and environment purauant to 43. :nc ReM (S8"A) And objective. of the aHA. Such
13 practice. are preterred and required by law and aoiantitic principle •• It ia
14 now reque.ted that the City articulate ito rationale tor depArting trOM the
15 beat. available oclenco recoumondatlon contained in the environmental ifllPact
16 atat.elllOnt co!trVAnt to thto apped . That 10 detondnativo Dubatantlvo
11 infOrMation neeea.ary for adjudiCAtion ot the ioouoo outlined heroin.
18 4.~ City Code tin particular a.pect. preaont And tuturel purport to Ignore
19 the plain and Una~iguous languAgo ot the OMA i~pact fee atatutea and the
20 requirement. iterated within this petitlon and bocAuae an amend~nt i. being
21 propoaed ao a pArt of theAe Actlona, tho City of Renton 10 now required by
22 law to ordain and i~plo~nt code or regulations In confo~lty with auch
II leglalatlon and 36.10A.llOlb). City actiona and dec1oionll vore IUdo ln
24 diaregard of relevane tacta and clrcum.tancaa. A toreea.t of futuro
15 tran.portatlon noedo Ja a rcqulaite of the act and othar aectlona of law and
Petition tor Review· l' Aud "ldIGholi 'Joa II ••• U'U.
a~"cOll. It". 'lOS'
1 ad .. lnhtl"ative rule., and h.a been oadtttteS, along: with otber auc:b
5 of the objective. aneS purpou. of the :1'.70 RCW, (OMAt and 4:I.21C RCM. UII'A.,
"I lG.70A.:102 RCW.
• t.' Decaule petitioner BraeS Nlchol.on ha. correctly outlined, detailed, and
, articulated the .ub.tantlve and procedural lllgil '.GUO. and according to
10 applicable law aneS the rule. of thla board, attachlng them herewith and all
11 reforred to in thla petition along with ita ~tarlal according to w •• bln9ton
12 Law.nd the rulel of thla board, he i. now entitled to be heard and hi.
11 poaldon III\IDt be afUrmed by tlaia board according to w .. hington Law in order
14 to produce the aingle, ha~nlou. body o[ law outlined in ad_lniltraelve
15 rule. pertaining to community, trade, and econceic development .
17 In aeeking to Identify other relevant legal authorities, pl.r~e~1 abould
11 refer to .ouree. at all level. o[ 9ove~nt. including Lederel and atate
19 Conatltutione. federal and atate Itatutel, federal and Itate ad$inl.tratlve
20 r09UlatlonD •• nd judicial Interpretation. thareoC.
21 MAC ]65,195-725 Constltutlon.l provlaions.
22 Loc'al plan. and regulatlona adopted under the l-ct are lIubjoct to the
2:1 aupremacy prlnelpl~ or Artiel~ VI. United lit. tea COn.titution and ot Article
24 XI, Bectlon U, w .. hlngton lIt.te Constitution.
"
rotltion [or Review· 17 't'd ,lJidlclJ_
.lJOO " ••• 21'" • • ~tan. Wa . ,.~s.
•
o o
1 4.' hUtton,u' brhCod tho hauo. and pruented the~ to tho City, ita
1 and argulMnt appl1C'Ablo hero.
.. t.' Following review and tho order declared by thi. board, all elemonta of
, cOIaprehontllve plan and .... Mngtan law in ordor to bo cOIIIpUant puuuant to
7 ),,70A.010.
• 4 .' PeUtioner'. prdl .. lnlU"Y Un ot' exhibit. w111 tollow upon requnt and
10 tho oxhJhita propo •• d are contained in tho record created betore tho City ot
11 aenton in tbo proc ... u heeling up to thb potltlon.
12 4 .10" dodgnated Uma ud d •• dUno for logd briefJng and argurnant may
13 to110'01 It the City or Proponent would elect to 00 proceed. Thh petition
14 ohould be revllll'!ll'od and atUnned by thh board.
15 4.11 At tho concluolon of th ••• proceeding., petitioner will bo entitled to
l' rollef &nd an order in hi. favor under and aecordlng to rul •• of thi, board
17 and under W.ahington la~ becauao there 1a now no .-tortal tact at iaauo in
11 tht. proceeding that 10 rolevant to a dhpodt10n of it and therofore a
a ruling 1n favor of tM. petition ahould follow a •• !Utter of la~.
2.
21
Petition for Reviow • 11
• • • ,
arad II'Jel'loohOll
.IlDO N ••• n·n.
aefttan. " •• f,O, •
o
1 V. A"laM4TIVI CAVa.s 0' ACTION
.. 5.1 Count 1,
4 City leaderahlp, and St.tt are entruatod to carry out tho provt.lona ot tho
5 Cithon'. cOIIIprehonalve phn, and aro ontruotad to rertono gOY.~nhl
, ptocea.o. acCOrding to public policy requiremente. The City iOVern.cnt and
1 certain ofricial. dotied the cor.prehonoJvo plan and botrayed citi.onry, and
I "hU. tho nece ... ry truot in the proc ... w •• unlawfully (oregone. and "U1,
, Jf not aubjected to an order Jnvftlldati ng certain provioiona. violete la"ful
10 provhiono and objecttv •• or the o.:t .
11 5 ... Count 2,
12 noPOnwT ""lLG TO '''TUn 8DlU1Df 0,. ,aooP.
13 Tho proponent, The 9001ng Company, by n.c •••• ry J~lJc.tlon h •• the burden of
14 dOll'lOnotl'ot1l19 that the propoaal (ultUh public Jntoreat requJrct:lOnto. The
15 ooepany objectlv •• are not relevant to thOle proceedingD. Sub.tlntill
U evJdence and beta that prove the nece .. ary prongl of pUblic inte.nlt vete
11 not articulated by the. proponent . Ac t ionl at 'Ilue here conltJtute arbItrary
11 and capricloul lpot zone accordIng to judicial interpretation ••
It I .l Coutat l,
21 Boeing eo..q,any neka rezone [or PUtpOlfI of .. le of the land without tho
22 propelal baln!] within the MOrah. huah. ufety, and general welfaro of
23 Renton Cithenry and tile e.xcludve goah ot lhe Ict. Coaplny repruontatlvu
240 cUd not demonltrato required fMterJal hct It the pubUc helringl that vtlro
25 held on the _tten that aro the oubjeet of thie appeal.
PetItion tor Rev!ew -19
Dr." "'J~l_
,)JOG " ••• ZI'.t •
... ,.,_. It •• '10"
o
1 procca. deceived tho public by hiding tho true a.lenee of tho propol ••
1 ra!_!l ahopping contor. Trlo.port.tion copacity of exi.tlng roada ond
4 .odollng provided ~r. not for the true propel •• and okewed in
5 favor of tho proponent . TT.n~port.tJon nt9ht~r. that wou l d onauo would bo
, and thoro ~. boon no toroc •• t tor l~rov.-ant. that .hould be
, r.oult of tho diroct and cumulativo impact. ot tho propo •• l throu9h
, Icioneo ~ro not incorporated into tho purported City amendment ••
10 roo ordinance. lock obeervanco ot noxu a and proportionality limit. of
11 Scat.e COnotitution. City h.aring oxa~in.r and Planning commi •• ioner
12 tor .010 record that thoy would be Urad if thoy found tacto in hvor
13 tho petitioner. Export. c~nlc.tion. occurred every day without public
14 iavolvnMInt and recordation .
IS 5 ." Count "
17 i •• quality of aubject matter and partie. rolavant to thi. petition
18 tbat ba. been adjudi cated in prior quali-judicial a~iniatrativo proceedinga.
19 i. an evidentiary burden upon tho proponent to provo that the
lurroundlng tho pul lic'. intereat and rollanca upon it. current
21 coeprehenlivo planning have aubltantially changed Dince tho la.t tlmo tho
21 property v •• loned. Propo~ent ha. tailed to countor thi. ovidenti.ry tOIl'
11 with evidentiary Nterial .
Petition tor Review -10
-.
lrall HJC'hol-.
3'~O H ••• ;II'6t •
•• nton. H •• "OS'
. .
I 5.5 Count S,
2 :n'C'O.IUtLJT l'LANlIlHO AHD LAC1C 0' COMWON ,unon o,au.na AGA.IN" ."aCI,.:U:
5 of pre.ent snd futuro goneration. of W •• hington citi •• n.-, but
, ordinance. do not carry out tho •• provi.ion •• Objective 5 of the sct,
1 othara, would be circu~anted by tha City dater-instlon. and onact .. nt.
• to thi. appeal . Purported ordinanc •• thwart legitimate public
, Proponant and respondent litigated to exclude the nccel.ary locial,
10 and lawful Itatute. and judicial interpr~t.tion ••
11 .6 Count "
14 City of Renton governraent know. frOll prior appeal. and eXperience and Btate
15 legillative onactDOnt. that tho i~.ct .itigltion ced •• do not comply with
16 aactiona of lav. Patitioner plea. to oblerva growth .. nage.ent
n objective. and neXl.le and proportlondity req\lireDlllt. have been dIU~rste1y
11 Mitted by City governll'lent and proponent. ,.doptcd City relolution regarding
20 tha growth .. nagemont act. City and Proponent refuled to sddr •• o jUltifiable
21 patitioner concernl, and non·dher~tionary, IMlldatory c~lianee with the
"
.""''''y valuable and iMpOrtant epeciel including Cnlnook .almon, Steelh.ad
Petition for Review -21 .ud' NfdloJ_
.noo "'.'~'·.t . • .nton. ~. ,.OJ'
o o
1 trout, and Bull trout '.Il101'19 ethan' are Ihtod ... endangered or thr •• Untld
1 and inhabit arna ilNllCldiatoly adjacont to the propal'lent. and ahould be
) protected \1011'19 all practicable me.na and me •• ur •• according to legal
4. provhiona . Th. Beat lI.1nagttMnt Practice. are n.c •••• ry to protoct thoir
5 habitat according to tho OKA . City a.endment a unlawfully departed tra. tho
G acianc. b •• ed r.c~nd.tion. mad. within thoir iMpact .tatomont .
,
, 6.1 PetItioner ••• lgne orror to all council finding. and r.c~nd.tion. and
10 concludon.. and adopted orcUnancea l""t .pacifically articulated •• j\lat and
11 lawful within thi. peti tion . Irror i •••• 191'104 to Council finding. 1, 2, and
12 1 nleva:lt to thb petition.
1l
14 Vll . UI,o.aa AHD 'ftAlfBXtTTAL 0' .. CORD
15 7 .1 Petitional' requa.t. that within thirty daya at palDelllon at thil
l' petition tor review, the reopondent Ihall file with the board and aerve a
17 copy on the petitioner a relponle to thil petItion and an index at and all
II saterial uled In taking tho actiono that .r . tho aubj ect ot thil petition far
19 reviev and according to the ~ravllionl at the Rulee properly promulgated by
20 thi. Board . The rOlponle and index ahould alia contaIn Gufflcient identifying
21 info~tion to enable unique document. to be dl.tingul.ha~le and the nature
22 of record'. factual polition to be I.certained . In addition, tho written and
23 tape record~d recordl at the leqi.lative proceedingl that creat~d need for
24 thi_ action Ihall be required to be .. de Ivailable to the petitioner for hil
25 inlplction and Ule, .11 of which 6re identified in luch inde. according to
Petition for Review • 22 Ir .. d "'chohon
~JOO " ••• ~".t . lI.,.tOO'l , "4. fUJI
1 rupondent provide. copy ot tha purportad na.., toning .. p.
4 ,.~ The proceedIng. rel~v.nt to thl. appeal ate IncoeQlete at thl. tl ...
5 Tran._ittal of adcUtSonel _terial created before the City in then
, proceeding ••
• UQ1uetlflab1. an4 Arbltra!y and Unlawful ••• cm.
, '.1 Doctlng ..,uu the property reeoned end the pn>perty h aarrently
10 de.lgnated on the City toning .ap a. IH or heavy induatrlal end S. delineated
11 on the varioue exhIbit. of the environmental i.pact .tat~nt and the record
12 created in the proceeding •. city end Proponent feiled to de-aaetrete that t~
11 project io guided by legltI .. te economic obiectiv •• of the aHA .
14 Tho CitY'a adopted"comprehenalve plan ~ld need to be Ignored or rever.e~
15 In order to acc ..... oodata the pr-opoJl~l alternatlvn and the aubi:equent rei-one
l' end regulation. that are requeated. The City aarrent. ~holoaome. and adopted
17 cC*prehenaLve plan outline in the Ec~ic: Developlllll'nt aleoent ot the plan
11 lu objective, (objective £D-CI 1. to.
20 lJgbtl elllployrDllnt b .. e" and along ..,ith direction to develop varioue
21 -.trategtea" to achieve tho.a goala . Tbeir propo.al indicat •• only that .ucb
22 • legitimate City of Renton objective (eapecially con.Iderlng It. hi. torI cal
21 ~nufacturing and Indu.trlal production) would by nec ••• lty need to be
25 medaln by an ·Urban Center" dedgn.tlon.
'" "
tJnd IfldloJ_ nCO'II ••• ;I,'.r .
ItMtcIrI. ... ,un
e o
2 ah&reboldor value, ita own vision, and it. ovn objectivee according to the
1 Wldhputctd faeta at record.. That h outdde tho C'OCIprebendOQ or tho
, act. That too h Outaide tho ectIIprehene10n or tho act .
, '.2 )'.70~.020 RCW require. and outlin •• the goal. that are to bo uled
• exc:1ud\'ely to guide the devolopeent and adoptlon oC comproheneJyo ph.ne. The
, purported coapr.han.ive plan and zoning .~ndment ignoroe It .
10 Tho City Start ha. net p.rto~d tho actionl required by •• ctJone ot
12 C1.Irrel1t zWling d .. ignationa ourroundJng tho .ro •• Tho Boeing Company h
1) guided by profit and ita own inter.eta. and ha. ignored and i. not guided by
14 CMA objective •• It .gr~ed with that IIceue.tion through ita al10nco and it.
15 inability to profter evidence within the acceptable prong. o( jurisprudence.
u Thi. propos.t and purported tonin9 hu been created outside of the objectives
17 o( tlI. CMA.
l. ..) J'.70A.070 RCM requires aa ~nd.tory that the City comprehenaive plan
1t -shall be an .tnternally condatent dOC\lllle:nt and all ole_nta ahall be
20 eonsi.tent v.tth the future land uae ~p. There i. no way that auch internal
2~ eonaiatency can be achieved unle •• the propoaal and purported adoption of it
22 includea ao abrupt and severa change of direction in the City Coeptehenaive
21 Plan. including provi.ions that presently, even aD we reVIew, provide. land
2C area designatlona intended to fulfill social, econOCllic. and other ,
2' require_ate of etthenry according to the act.
P.cition for Review . 2. .,./1 "JcfIoJaoon
.IJOO II ••• II'n . • ..,tcIII. It •• ,,0$'
I 1.4 There ora clooe to 1),000 employeel prelently amployed in -.nufacturing
2 and indultrJal jobl on or "round the lubject lita . Hhtorically, it could
) IccOCiIillOdate "",ny .ore . 11lat Iita h •• produced IIICIre comnarcial drcraft than
4 any other lito in the world . Renton work.ra aro vo~ productiva and continul
5 to be . The clplcity for -.ny eare jobl would be loet if thele purported
, alllendMnu are poootted to .tand.
7 1.5 Tho property in quntion allould be regulated to eUltatn and CI)tJ).Ind the
1 CitY'1 induotrial and manufacturing emplor=ent baaa . It i. clear that tho
, City 11 guided not by Tho Orowth Hanage_ftt Act or it. own eooprollonllve
10 plan, but by othor unauthorlzed objectivel. Tho prope'al i. =ada, according
11 to ttla BIB doc\lll\C!ntl and city dDC\WCInti . in order to benofit tho proponent
12 .tockholder value and thoir objectiveo, and to increa •• City portion or .al~.
1) tax revenue. They retuI' to dticul. economic i~.ct., upon ordinAry e1tiaonl.
14 1.6 In virtUAlly all of tho documenta, Ind throughout tho 'nyiron~ntll
15 iMPact .tatement, the company reiteratea, there are no preferred or aplcific
1& propo .. b for development, the CDalplny doea not intond to diacontinue itl
17 preaent operationo, and that the propo.al repro.entl a pot~ntl.1 tor a broad
II range of uo~a. It haa only been ouapect that the propoaal il .peclfically for
l' purpo.e ot • quickly profitable ralone. Ther~ io no neod to re~one the
20 aubject property at thi. time if there are no plana in place to change ita
II uae. There !. preaently a .ueeeeaful and productivo commercIal airplan.
2l factory in operation at the oito . Profita gained f~ operation 0' tho .ite
2) enabled proponent to diveraify ita e~any into a -global enterprlao-while
24 purcha.ll1g other manutaeturera ouch all McDonnell Dough., lIughea, Roc:kwl1,
l5 and other.. High prod ~c tion rat.e and profitability are etill being reported
ratition for Review ~ 25 ar. .. Jf/c""hon
l')H " ••• lI'n. IUltOlf • .,., no,.
o
1 oYert in the IIlIdat ot: the biOgut downturn in .vi.tion hhtory. Tho 7)7
l drcnft to. the but ul11ng ah:cratt in connerchl aviation hiatory and IIVlDn
1 .. tbh .,.eitlon b read, it continuo. at .. very high volumtII rate.
, futura. Petitioner briefed tho nlled tor dhC'U .. lon and compliance with lava
7 ~ rul •• in .. fl page brief. but to no avaU, beeaulIO the propoeal .ttll
, '.7 It h iq>orultt to note that 3G.10A.0)0 MCW 171 proch.ty
10 define. tho to~ ~devolopment regulationo-, and •• follow. I -Development
11 regulation.-or -regulation-_ana the controlo placed on devalopcllClnt or land
12 "ae activitl •• by .. county or city, including. but not limited to, .oning
13 ordinancee, critical are •• ordinancea, ahorolino _ator programa. otticial
14 control., planned unit dovelop.ant ordinance., aubdlvialon ordinanc •• , and
15 biading .ite plan ordinance. together with any amendlllent, thar-eto".
II 1.1 Ther-efora, a pl"Opo'al for-a r-eaone I, a propolal for a develOpMent
11 regulation aed ouch. prope.a} i. defined a. a development r-egulation by
11 wa.hington Law. I~act feo and lur-taee wate~ ordinancea and regulation, a1,0
U an within thi. dafJnltion.
20 I .' ll.70A.210 lew delineato. tho .. ttera that ara the .ubje~t or board
21 review, 31.10A.210(11 reado, A growth management hoa~Jn9a boar-d 'hall hear
22 and dotandne tho, .. petition' aUeging either,
23 (bJ 1. in conpliance with tho requlre.ent. ot thi' chapter,
24 •. 10 aeeauee tbere J. no 10ga1 prelusptJon of validity concerning the
.S adoption of zonIng ordinancea according to Waahlngton lav roque at tor this
Petition for RevJew • 2'
--"--
ar.tI JllcIloJ""
~Jfte 1f ••• ,.'6t.
a.nton, ••• "OS,
,
,
1 board to take notice of the proponent'. burden of proof Je now properly and
1 '.11 The proponent and the City worked together to circumvent the prJ_ry
• of Renton do not aatidy ouch a require_nt.
10 the growth management act. The City of Renton eallo under thia aactlon and
11 therorore a rezoning ordinance Ja proper .ubject .. ~ter tor review by thl.
12 boud.
11 '.11 Zoning and comprohenalve plannln~ and development regulationa, like tho
14 public moral. and general weleare, have lina. (lawa' delineating theIr
15 limit., and the overlay and propa.ale and theee unjuet regul.tione cannot be
l' harmoni~ed wIth euch legitl~te ethical and DOral, legal, atatutory,
11 judicial, and ConatitutIonal li.lte.
l' 1. without and lacking any apeciflc racte demonetreeing how the public
20 econ~lc inter.at juatlfy a rezone, a remand [or rever.al and invalidation ot
31 the purported City ordlnancea i. warranted. Clty and proponent together
31 litigated and argued that aodal, econc)lftic, and other requirement. of
21 cit13ene need not be dlecue.ed in thl. procee •• Thorefore no evidence exi.t.
24 lndlcatlng aubotantlal evidence aupportJng juetltication for the re.on.
25 oxhte. Under thla additional circum_tance, tho rezone ahould be declared to
Petition for Reviaw • 27
• . ::':.:...:. ,,~ .
.. . "
end ""cnoh4ln
3100 ", .•• U'U. aen'Qa. ~. "01'
• .,
o o
1 be invaUd. Thb .hould be autOlMotlc and 1. tho fund.mantd rule of zoning.
2 There hAo b.on no chango of u •• of tho proponent property in dlatrict 2, no
1 chango 1. anvi.lonad, and thorotoro • rezone in that ar.. 1 ••• poel_lly
.. uuhwrul.
5 '.15 Aa • *Attor of tact, aubetantl_t evidence indicating that tho purported
, ordinanc •• were enactad whila tho quantum of exiatlng avidence n.c •••• ry tor
• thor •• ttor expr •••• d further incon.latent tacta by ra.elution. Wa.hington
, State LegJalaturo ottered the proponent .ulti-pill1ona of dollar. In Gtate
10 tax value .0 an incentive to continuo co do Indudtri.l bueln ••• of tho typo
11 at 10,uo haro oval' a period of y.ara. (IRenton Dtaft and otticialo have been
11 encouraging proponent to reaone,) Itho t.rgDol' and moat preltlg!oua aoroapaca
13 company tn the world)). That Btate l~glalatlon waa enacted.a lavand
1t expr ••••• the ~rall And ethical principle. of w •• hington Citicerl. and they
15 havo .xpr •••• d it with lotI of mon.y. It ia not the duty of the r •• pondent
l' and "Ichobon to boar the burd.n of .. king auch a demonotratton.
17 1.1& Again, a demonltratlon ot current et.te of tho h.art. mind. inner
11 conviction. economic and locial valuea and perception ot jUltice and prudence
1t and fact. ot aoclal. econocaic, and other requlre/llOnte of preDont aud futuro
10 goneratlona of Renton citisenry II required and ha. not been proven by the
II proponent. That. b grounda for invalidation of tho zoning ordinaneel hero at
l:l1 laaue.
2S '.17 The trafUc impact mit1g"tion tee. that ar. currently being impend by
Petition for Review ~ 21
•
Iud Iflebo.han
UOO " •• ,;U'.t,
Mwnfon, w.. "OSI
•
•
1 the City ot Renton are purported to be under UBPA trOlll OrdJnanca 3100 adopted
l by the City in 1". (copiu attached,. The Btate Statutea that the ..
3 ordinaneea do not cocply with were adopted ahortly th.reattar.
4 e.l' The City haa t.tlod to follow the prevla10na of ita own ordinance, whieb
, tee will be readopted aa • roo under the Orowth Hanage~nt Act and reviewed
'7 pcrJocl1caUy thereafter .-
• e.u Tho City h .. adoptel1 ita OMA eoraprehendve plan aMCU1cSM.nta and
, i~lomcntln9 ~aDuro. that b.ve tailed to provide compliance tor the
10 tran.portation and tire illlp&ct ,lIttig_tlon fea. aa growth _nage.ent f ••••
11 Neither h .. the City periodicaUy revie_d the feu theredter , Kight yun
\l etter adoption of Ordinance 3100 and over ten y.ar. after resolution 1911,
u the City ha e tailed to Mot tho provJelonl of it. 0'IIn oreHnance •• runher,
14 thb ordinanco r.qulro. under Section III that '
15 -Thl. reo appllo. to all new deve10paent that i. aubject to GEPA ravie •• •
U 8 .20 Th'" Ure ""JtJg_tlon fee currently eraployed by the City requlrea 8:10
17 au.tClUtic u.nivenal contribution aDd without tho required language and
11 providonl or n .Ol RCW .
19 '.ll under 82 .02 .050(4, RCW, City of Renton tl lubjlct to both the
<10 requirement a ot U .7CA .010 and ita COIIIPrehenaivo planning under n .10 RCW,
<11 and the pertinent requirement. of 12 .C2 .uSC RCN thru 12 .02 .0'0 RCN inclu.1ve.
2<1 '.<ll Onder the above require~nte and in order to obletve tho clear and
23 unaMblguoul intent ot the legl elatlon, the City ~rehen.iv. plan DUlt
2. reepect tha provJllon. of '2 .02 .020 RCW that atateD I Except .1 provided In
<15 ~CW '2 ,02 .050 through 12 .02 .0'0, -No county, city, town. or othor ~lclpa1
potition tor Roview • 19
.-... "'--
.... d "tdWJ_
ZJOO •• 6 .ZI'n .
.hnt_ ....... ",..
-..
'.
1 corpoutlon .h"ll impolle any tax, tee, or chargll. either direct or indirect,
1 on the c:onatructlon or reconstruction of r.aldentt.l building •• commercial
1 building., industrial building., or on any other building or building epace
4 or appurten.neo thareto, or on tho development, aubd!via1on. c) •• ailie.tion,
5 or recta •• ltie.tion of 1and~.
6 '.11 There aro other related mandate. lncluJlng and outlined in the atatute.
7 acw IZ .02.050(1)RCN that atat.a, It 1. tho intent of tho leal.l.turo,
11 which count! •• , citie., and town. eay requJre, by ordinance, that new growth
12 and devel~nt pay II proportionate ohare of the coat of now taciIlt! ••
1] noedlld to aervo new growth and dovalopmont l
14 '.24 All of tho impact too requirementa and plano and r09ulationa ahould
15 obearve our Con_titutional neXUD and proportiondJty require_ntD, While
17 ordinancea conplJant with el .Ol new and aHA . and Duch lee_ are a requirement
11 at tbe CHA . There SUDt be no tee, wben thore ia no opeciel benetit conferred
l' that Ja not required ot the public: at large, and when tho leo 10 not illlpOaed
20 in furtherance of legitimate govern.ental objective. that are the .ame aa
II thoae that would be advanced aD juatitJcatJona for prohib1ting the u.o. To be
2l aure, only a voluntary egreol!lOnt that h reaDonable impeoed to mitigate tlie
23 direct 111'1p&ct frOfol tho project h pel'1llitted. and that requireD an
24 artieuhtion ot t.he identity at: the IIFecit'ic: ll11pro'lolllent that IllUDt be _de &II
25 a re.ult of tho direct J~.ct ot the development.
Petitton lor RevJew • 30
.C'.d Hkhltbon
.uOIl H ••• 2I·~t .
~.ncon .... "OJ~
5 lI.cttonll o( the act. That IIctlon haa not been ptirlor.ed.
10 bordar ar..ltII crlticd to .. ll11On and cittaena . Ilabltat (or apawning and
12 Sockeye Gal~n. DQl1y Varden, aull Trout, Lake Naahington CUttbroat, and
1) Rainbow and CUtthroat trout (Lake Nuhington/Ba __ lIIhh J:okanee nud Mt be
14 .entloned becaulo they are alr~ady extinct) are d1ettnct Ind lilted ••
16 located in or around tho lIubjoct dte.
11 1.2' rotttJonor requeeted code and co-tnehendve plaa a_ndlllOnta 1n order to
11 ob .. rv_ the belt Ivallab)e .eienee. Tho lllPaet Itate_nt per(orllled
19 ncotl'Wllended that the EcologY'lll&nual be adopted . In tho ecnteltt of thh
20 requeat. thla ahould moAn that the beat available acientlrJc: engineering
21 available regarding atorm water entering lake Na.bington and Cedar kiver nult
22 be uled to In(o~ lhe related comprohonl1vo planning Ind public poliey
21 dool110nl Ind regulationa and be contalnlld In the record . City did not ~ke
24 lin oHidll (Jnding ot bct or conc1ullon ot law regarding the beet avaUable
25 aeionce , Petitioner oHered lc1cntUie lntorution on the lubject but it val
potitlon tor RevIew . 11
,
Ir." .'dlals«! .?JOO 1f.It.u·n •
• .neon, __ • "'J'
o o
1 not properly conelderad. Aa • .attar of tact, on. of tho commi •• lonera
1 That finding wa. clearly orrCReoua. For ono. oven it it ~ •• analyzed in te~.
4 of inlttal coata, it 1. untruo. Tho benefit. of actanee tar outweigh any
5 negative. whon viewed r~ tho per.poctiva of tho entire record •• aub.ltted
, and tho property !Ught be "e.d for aeientlUc rOleereh and manufacturing.
1 •• 27 Tho City of Renton curront coda Ja •• follow ••
• 4-'.OlO DRAlJfAOB (GURPACB NATRR) STANDARDS Tho dralnage phn shall be
, prep.ted in confonnanco .... ith tho cor. and tlpecial Roquire_nto contained in
10 •• ctiooa 1.2 and 1.) of chapter 1. tho hydrologic .nA1Velo mothode containod
11 in chapter J. tho hydraulic anglyaia and d •• 19" criteria in chapter 4, and
12 tho .ro.ion/.odl~nt.tlon control plan and practicea contained in chapter S
1) of the 19'0 xing county Qurface Water Deaign "anual. except where amonded o~
14 appended by the t'epartMnt.
15 •• 21 Again, becausc )6.10A.1)oI1' Ib) RCW atatca l -Any aaendment of or
l' reviaion to a comprehensive land uae plan ahall conform to thia chapter-.
17 -Any aeendecnt 'of or reviaion to development ~sgulation. sholl be conaiatent
11 with and i~lement tho coeprohonaive plan-, The City of Renton Code .uat uae
l' the beat available aclenco to protect thia critical area . Tho above code
20 except i. one exaEple of .octiono that are in n"ed of reviaion, or in tho
21 alternate, orticulation at tho reAaonllble buh for depllrture frOfll lIueh a
22 neb; ':ld.H:l on contained within the record.
23 '.29 No ovidenco v •• offered to indicato that tho propoaal purports to reduco
2. pollution diachargeo to the ..xi.um extent practicable .
'5 '.10 Large alllOUnta of Nitrogen, Phosphorue, lleavy fllCtdll. and oll relAted
Patltlon for Ravlew • 12 BUd Nlchol_
lJDD N ••• ,,'.t . •• ntOll. _ •• ,IDII
1 toxic .lob.taneoa al:O generAted through uphdt pa",ing, vehlelo. and ,,111
5 .clentiUc infolllllotion, pe:,·rondng r1901:0,,* olllPirlcal oburv_tiona, and
7 .clonee require_nt .rtlculatc:d in the relevant Qrowth Kanagow.ent Act 'fO\Ild
a not occur . Thore h no legltiNte re.noll .... hy the Icology "anual ahou14 not be
10 practicable and while protecting the very valuable and vulnerable "peeie.
11 that wIll likely be hat'lllOd to a great degree by the propo .. l. That 1. what
12 ...... reco ....... nded with the 1111pact .uteNnt porfonned 'or their propo .. l. The
U be.t ongineering and aclence to pr'oteet thflm le necee •• ry. My departure frocn
14 tho.o requirement. mu.t be ju.tittod wIth .ubatantlve evidence and rational,
15 .ound, engineering and .eienti'i .. fact. Th.t ju.tifle.tlon i. not pre.ont in
l' tho adalnt.trati",o record 1",ad1n9 up to thl. appeal.
11 ~X, ITATJXDI"l' 0' rua ..
l' LEOAL lOBUlI NUMBE.R 11
20 Can the City Rexone tho Subject property and whllo the only ju.tifleatlon
21 th.t h •• been provided indicate. that it would benefit only the proponent and
22 •• le. tax revenue, while ita own compreheneiYe plan provleion. indicate a
2) roquiro~nt to auetaln and expand tho curront induetrial and mAnufacturing
:U omplor-:nt base?
l5 LEGAL ISDUB INHBER 2.
retltion for Review • )] a .... ,. Iflc:lloJ-.
~J"O 1f •••• U·Ie . aenron, ... "OJ~
-
•
1 Ia it Mt Arbitrary and Capricioua and Clearly erroneaua to proceed with a
3 tho condition of tbo p~blic ~rala ba. changed at ~ll aineo tho Ia.t time the
4 property va. 20ned and .rg~ •• to exclude .~b.t.ntive evidence ar.d vhen In
., Act?
• LEGAL ISSUE NUMBER 3,
, Ca.n the City or the proponent ahow ttult Induatry and _nufacturing are no
10 longer d •• irable to Renton and N.ahlngton citizena and amend ita zoning _p
11 and when approximately 13,000 people are pr •• ently employed at Booing.
1l and ",hen the atate tula nov ottend the COIIIpany ever three billion dollar. and
13 .ore in atate tax value a. an incentive to contInuo to do bueina •• in thi.
U LIO.\L ISfiUI: NUMBD 41
l' can. rezone and _p a .. ndNnt that would aUOW' a largo .hopping canter and
11 condondftiWMI procaed to replace indunry and tIUIn'Jfacturing and when tho
II prcponeDt baa expre •• ed no plan. to terDlnate their pre.ent operationa, be
l' allowed under the Grovth Management Act and the city cc:xrprohandve plant
20 ' .... JaL ISJiUE NUMBER 51
II Can tho aubject property be re.oned and when there ha. bean no .pecific
l2 articulation •• to the con~ition .nd detail. a. to how the propo.al furthera
II a ..xi.um economy pur.uant to the public .atety, he.lth. moral. and general
24 volbu or the objective. for econOll.ic development?
25 LIQM, IBSUK NUMBBR , I
Petitlon tor RevIew • 34
, ~ .
arM "'c:hol_ ~JOO N .•• U'Ot.
aotnton ..... "U~
•
1 Can the City council approve a reeone on tho DooJn9 ConoolJdatod operation.
4 and that tho application wa ... de only for tho purpo.o of con.idoration and
5 whon thore hu bun no OMpreu{on of tho need to perfona tho planning in
., LBOAL %SOUl NUMBER ., I
I Can the CJLY amend and proceed with a code and dovelo~nt regulation. change
, and when their own code requireD l~act tee atatut •• to be readopted a.
10 Orowth MAnagament feea and whon the e.loting code ignorea tho plain and
11 unaablguoua language of ReN 1~,Ol and 1f,?OA .0?O ReN?
12 LKOAL ISSUS HUMDER I I
11 Can tho City amend ita code and development r egulatJon. and for tha purpoeo
14 of a converting indu.trial manufacturing to large retail ahopping center and
15 conda-inlu .. while .11eglng that thore would be lea. pollution generated fro.
16 vehicle. and .aphalt u.ing tho 1990 King County Manual in lieu of ~xleu.
17 extent practicable And beat available aclence regulatione and while conveying
11 atorN wator into Lako Waohlngton and when there are ao .any eonlJtiv. and
l' endangered epeciel immediately adjacent to tho lubject elt. and vhen they
20 hay. not oxpr •••• d tho rationale for their departuro fro. tho acienca bo.ed
21 rocCllllMndation coutainod within the record creatod before them?
22 LEOAlo IOSUK NUMBER 'I
2] Can the City proceed without ualng BOlt "anIge~nt Practlc •• contalnod in tho
24 Bcology manual and whon there are no factual finding. contained In the
25 officIal record indlcatln~ that the City intend. to protect habitat for
Petition lor Review • 15
ar.d .ll'1c:boJ.art
UOIt .II', •• ZI'.t. amton, ... "os.
o o
1 on~ng.rod •• leon utilialng beat ~n.gement practice. or aub.cantlv. evidence
l LItOAL USUS NUMBIR 101
4 C&n tho City ne.ring Ixoniner or-dol', and Proponent and Reapondant arg-uo and
5 litigate to exclude evidence ot locid ami oconll11l1c and other conuquencea
IS and thon 8tUI not be oubject to an order DC ir.vaUdation and wben it hal
7 'ther_Core not damonltrated c~li.nc. vlth objective n~r 5 and other
I objectivea of the act1
, LIOAL ISSUE N\mDBR 111
10 Are the Zoning ordinancew Ii, ted above conalatont vith and do they i~l.ment
11 the City .~nOtalc development element objectIve •• h required by the act
l' without requiring that tho City auataln and oxptnd the current manufacturing
11 and lnduatrial employment ba •• and it not ahouleS they be lnv.lid.ted becau ••
14 they do not I1DplolMnt ouch cOIIPrehenDive plan providon.?
1S LIOJU., USUS NUKBSR 13 I
11 required by the act if the map amendment. are included into the plane and
11 develop!llOnt regulatione"
19 LEOAL ISSUS NUKDBR. 131
20 Are theee ordinancee, zoning. development regulltions. new zoning m.p. and
21 identified iaauea areicullted herein compliant and guided by the oxclulivo
22 goah and objectivu ot tho Drowth HlnagelllCnt Act and S1.PI., with
23 particularity tho environmental ob1ective )0, econondc objective 5, and the
24 public partiCipation objectivo and without incluaion of legal juatification
25 tor departing trom the logal requirementa articulated in tho attached exhibit
'otition tor Review • )' ar.d /fldtoh.,
UCtO " ••• n'n . •• neon, We. "0"
1 originating .. & IIIOtion to tbe City lIuring a .. _iner or ducr!bod in tke
<I reeord or thh petition?
l
•
7 Xl'. allton. UD QIlIlD UQU!1ITaD
• 11.1 Having fully aet forth the required .leMenta (or a Petitlon for R.viev
, and juatitlcation tor an order of invalidity before thl. board, Petitioa.r
10 Brad Nicholaon praya for and re.peCtfully requeato the following relief l
11 11.2 A detllndnation that thh petition h coeplote and apprcprJate according
1:1 to legal procedure and ~ .. hington lAw and code .
1) 11.3 That upon receipt of thi. Petition, the Doard Dcheduie and hold heerioga
14 and aecapt and rul. upon theu i .. u .. In ""or of tho petitioner and hia
15 requut.
11 and requeua "'ithin the tillle Ucdu prucdbed by thb board or the rul .. of
11 civil procedure pr .. cribed by thh board.
a 11.S That l.ave to COIIIplete the dty proceeding. prior to •• tabUobing a
20 Dehedule be ordered, along "'ith tho conttnued right to amend thla petition
II thllrotol
22 11.6 That thence a aehedule and calendar be created eat.blt.bing deadllne.
2) for the aubmlttal of ~ttona and legal argument_ and briefing., and tbe date.
24 for hearing of .. -.roe or accoreSing to N .. hlngton AlImlnhtnt.lve Code 242-02 or
25 accordlng to the rule. properly and fairly promulgated by tbla 8oard.
Petition for Review -l'J
, -
&lAd .Jc+.ol_
J'JClO •••• n··n.
hilfOIt • .,.. ,.".
• • • . ,
o o
1 exhibit. and pro-h.aring bri.r. and petitioner be notified af •• ma .
1 11.' That following the hearinge held tor purpo •• of fulfillment of tho
• iatent and purpo •• of and apacifie .oction. or the lawa at tho Stato or
5 " •• hington, and upon tho concludon or tho •• hau •• , and arter hwful review,
6 thi_ Doard 1.,uI • final order finding that tho City ordinancea, regulation.,
, laning, and cod •• articulated hore and at 1 •• uI are not 1n compliance with
• the requlreraenta at the Growth MAnagement ACt , !ta IlIIIItndalonta. tho State
, Invironaental Poll~1 Act, ita amendment., and are thoro fore declarod invalid .
10 11 .' That this board 1 •• uo an order requiring tho City or Ronton to ob •• rve
12 articulated and acccrding to petitioners requoet with regard to tho •• la.u ••
11 atated herein and herewith ,
14 11 ,10· A finding by the board that the ieau". enu .. rated he~ewith a~e
U I:Qneluded In the t:avo~ of the petltionor Brad rl1choloon in theu p~oceedlngD ,
16 11.10 Po~ all euch other and further relief that tho 80ard determine. arc
11 nee •••• ry to fulfill the objectiv ••• nd purpo •• a and i. appropriato and jUlt
11 and which 1a w!thin the ju~1adlction of tho Board to 10 ordiu .
"
lO XXX. axBIaITB AND ATTACHk&HTa
II l' City .inute. of adoption of ordinane •••
II l' Recent Hearing Ex,u ... iner order.
2] 3) U plge IIIOtion and brief of p.t1t1one~ to City lIu~ln9 Exalfliner.
l4 4' Copy of City Conp~.h.n.ivo plan econoalc devolopeent ole.ont.
lS 51 Although not provided at thi. time, petitioner .xpect. to u.o .11 of the
Petition for Review -38 and Hle-holl'Otl noo H ••• 21'n .
•• nton •••• "0.'
•
.co Gt
, '
1 public jnto~tion created in tht. action, Renton Code and ordinancel, Rcviead
5 thereto, A copy ot the purported toning Map •
•
7
•
10 11.1 petitioner believea that the lnittal hearing upon thea. ~tter. vlll
11 eonlume .pr-~odlUt:ely one haa day up to poulbly CIne day ot the Boud'.
II time . Total tl~ taken to more . Opportunity [or petitioner rebuttal 1. now
15 o.tl~te I, being otterod with rogard to the requirement ot chapter 242 WAC.
115 Petitioner believe. that further tiM vll1 be nqueoted tor ..,UOM. hrthar
Petition for Review -l' arild ,uc:hol_
"JOO M ••• .t ... I •
• -rtt ......... "0''
o
,
"
o
1 1).2 Wb.reto~ •• petitioner Brad Nlchol.on lolemnly and ro.poctfully make.
2 thi. roqu •• t upon hi, honftlt and true boll.t that the contento and tact. and
) ll11u •• dClcribed horoln aro true, correct. right and jUlt according to
• ., .. hington 1.1."" and to the beat at: hh ablUty in accordance with MAC 242.
5
• ,
•
•
10
11
"
14
15
petition for Review -40
••
Dated thia ,t. day of September, 200)
RupectCully,
r;td4
Drad "lchoillon
2)00 N.E.28th Stroot
aonton, W.ahington
911056
.r .. d IfJdIoJioon
"OOll, •• II'lIt •
•• nton, ••• "0"
•
"
, .: ,
",
,
'" .. ,
, ,
,
,
..
, ,
,
, , E" , ,
'J • ,
-,'.
• , ,
~
" ,
..
" • , '
rl-----"-,
I
,
,
cln' Of' at:H1UN t:C.'ONOMI U.:Vt:,.cJl')W.NT fo!l.I:IoUm
,
I'olir.,. fJ)..ll. Crute II 1001 bolt of II1((nllvu,
fur rumpie-, rnOll! overla), Ulnc, lax Incrtmcnl
financing, marlcllng CIC . 10 encourage ret.iI
dcvelopmenl.
J'01lt1 Ef).1l. Creale IncenlivCl, (or (umple,
"vetla), lOne, lax increment financint:.
m:ukeeln, 10 encourage office development
I'olley £I).J4. Evalu.Ue the need (or
elparuion of commcr,bJ land UU'S In the
c.onlut ofthc Cily's desire 10 prolect
rahlenlbl bnd uses.
ObJtctlvc i:J)..C: Sumln and expand lhe eurrenllnduml~ '100 fmnu(ac.lurinc (b~y.mJ light)
etnploymtnt ~.
PoliC1 ED-15. Develop stutcCIe.\ 10 aUratl
manu(KtUrin: and Indusuial jobs.
I'olley £1).16. Wort wilh (lrlvlII: property
owners ani! govunmenlaJ agencies to remedy
mnwnirulod siu~s .. nd prtp1rc tho ,ltes (ur
redevelopment .
"olley EJ>..11. Work whh Industrial ant!
manufacturing rmploycu within the Clly 10
tlpand. redevelop and modun(zc their phy.slcaJ
plants .
ObJtdhe £1).1): PmYide inCenllyu for Downlown Economic DeveJopmcnl.
":--VII·'
1'0llc1 FJ).JS. ReI.1ln eli.uing and allt.Jct DCW
buslncssC$ that ccncrate consumer odenlcd
eom:netdaJ IIctivilY.
"olley I·D-ISI. AUfCSJi\'dy m.uktl downtown
as ., plxe 10 live. "hop and do buslncs.s.
('olley £D..lO. Achieve a rQ\()n:thle bUlIJ(e
bccwcen puking supply MId parkin, dcnund.
rolicy ED-li. Dcvi!lop. do""nlown p.1lklnc
"nlegy that I"fOyldcs loccntlvtS for downtowD
buslnru and null devcloptncnl.
ObJtdl ... : F.J).E: l!n.\ure a heahhict tt'&iorW
economy.
I'ollty ED .. ll. Influence Jot:l! And rl!1:ional
K'Onomlc devclopment eCCons.
, '---,-~" --,--< • ~·~'-'---_,.,.od ___ ._~_
·L
,
,
, < .,
,
•
•
r
, "
•
-
< ,
"
,
,
'~-,~
, ' ,
,
,
,
, ,
Strlnte CDI!ddu·'Mn
ltS'm iI.l!.
(.·ommuf\llys.:n'l~"ft: Ilmry
Mo~ AqWIIC Ct:llId' F<d
CORRESroNDENCE
C,lilCll Comment C,uIlCtoll •
Ootin" Renton Sll~ ElS
C"lIizcn CoollnOll: Ikrkholf7. •
(crEO), Dorin" Rmlon Sile:
E.S
m.D 8U!;INESS
Cpromj!!'P ar ,'" Wh"lr
M.lllftlng: !loan\: RmIOO Sil~
EIS
•
o o
MOVED IlV KEOtKER·WIIHLER. Sr:CONIlEO IW ('LAWSON,
COUNCIL AI'PROV\! Tire CONSr:NT AGENIM AS AMENDE!) TO
ItEMOVE ITEM 6.11. I-'OR SEMItAU CONSIDERATION . l"ARRJED.
FIIIJiltt lind lulOou31ion Sci \ll'd 1}q!.1III11CUI rt'l.jllOClcd "1"'111 ovalll( an
t~ .. JtIl,}n~'C' C"lahli,hinil ;ulnuuloo r~~ (Of Ih~ lIc:ury M~ Aqualic Caller.
Coun<ilm.m Owm3n nflled Ih .. ,lhe: ko r;lflgc (11.1111 53 10 $12. ",.h Irduccd fm
urS) or J.4 [". '''P ,\Io;nlll He 1lllt'IliClI1~d whether thnt mlUld be a d,na(ll1 r"
sll'Ul;tUfC rOl ra~1c: who au: ullly Ilotnilla .... ':I.'eh their childrcul\\1m, lind he
.ukcd slllifio I~\i~ Ih.u IlCWlbtlilY.
MOVI;-Il AY ('ORMAN. SECONUED BY rARKER. COUNCIL REFER
(,ONSENT MiENIM ITEM II ~ TO rOMMITIEE Of IllE WIIOL~.
CARRIED.
COffapontltllCe III";SS fe;lJ liom Ellc C,:ullaon. Pbnniua; COlllllII~lon Vice Ol.llir.
55 Williams A\'C. S .• 'jIlK. Rnllllfl, QR055, rt'(IU()till~ indLUiun orllll1) motiOlI'
llppi'oved by tht PI.nni", COllllnluiun 011 No\~mtl("l' III. 2(0). into tht final
monc deal/lImts rqprdlna; the Doting prop:l1)' lC'lOUIO". Th~ lilst ItauktJ big.
box rttolillkvtlopmcnt south orN.lhh St. in Ul)uil:t I. land the ~c:.\:ond
incllf1Wl'':uOI only the .d:ail Sotlts atq:ocy "''C)I orr.uk '\\'C . N. lind norlh urN.
Kill 51. in l>Utm1 I. Addiliun.,lIy. Mr. C.:ulI(fon c,'JlrfO"U«i conceln thallhlO"
CUIlenl sl:md.1.nb 1« Ihi5 ~loue incltule \'C1)' hllle t1dinilion lind ~alld.mb
retllN 10 sign"!;e. pctI~lri:U1-«ienIC\l1olIlnd.1I(ls, btuldula; malai:allllnd
bmhapin!;.
COITupondence "'OJ, rcut fllllll ~rin Iklkhollz. Was.hina;101'1 St:ale 1~r1:l1m!
orComnlunity. Tude .nd Economic l)evdofllllct1tlC'Tl!f'l. ro I.lo", 42525,
OI)T1lpil. 98504, 1~ .. t1inJ: Ihe Boeing f:nvirollt11elllllllm!Jacl Sl11(111mll'lntl
COll1prehensive PIAn amcndnu:nlJ, The letln' !.kI:ukd ",11~1 CfEt> liked .boul
Ihe dotrUIICnIf., :md .:1150 U1Tc:rN lUa;&($lion. IiJl' $Ilellj:lhcning Ihl: Comprdlmsive
Pl2llond tk. ... 'tl~n(:nl rq;ulaholllllllcntlmcnts.
Council r'ldlaall Krolkct·Whr;"Clct pfo.c:nlell a rl'J'Ofl fl'l:a,dm~ the IIpplie~Iion
(200j.M·IlII(.f The UOCIllIf l'!1III!l:IIIY RClI1m plant Jile 1:lItll 11"": InJP
. iUl1f1ldmcl1l ; bntllllC d~'mnll I~I ;l.L1lalUlUall; ~'OIICIII relll re/utlltl~ .:Inll
lK\,,'iupnll:O! )lanwrtls, 111\tutlmll p~rk;n& II'.:Indl,d,. silt ' ...... clllptllnll rlan
review, do'~1 ~mddm~: ::IIKIIWO nC\¥ lone daillnatiOfll ·thl: Ultl:In ('mlct-
North 1 :lIItI Uliun CmlC'f·Nurth 2; :llltllhc IIppliCOtlim (21IOj.M.tl5) lOr Ihe
Fry'. EltCtronit$ 200) ('r.11prchtnJh..: l'Iall :amendment:lAtI rt"IOlle.
The Comnlltln: tllt't munlllly Ihf()ua;h~1 200] lind weddy dUI1I1" Oc1tb:t ~nd
NO\'embtr II) fe\'1C\101thoc l'olllprthnuive PI.:.n amtndmenls :and anodltcd
rctllflCS, and lOllinG leA' .:Imcntlmcnls. The COl1ltllilln: rcconunmtkd Il'f1I'ov..l or
the IIppliC2liooJ su~cct 10 1 tit. Ii,llowm~ findin,':'Il !.Sf.:ummIN in Ihe .l.1n·
reponed dated No\'eOlbcr 17.200). ror the lJocin~ arplil:.lllflll. :alltl ();toller 11.
2(0). fot the Fry'lIl1pplialioll.
Flndinl:l=
I. Ihe proroscd amendlllent. nl«1 St..1i0l14·?·02()(i. Revitw Critctil!, in
Kenlan Muni,ipl1 Cudc: TilllO" IV Ilkwlopmrnl ltq:ul.:1I1011II . nle propos:alJ
Slirpor1 (I i::noi I n:lllll1l: IIllhe vi'IOII in Ihe latlOflln! l'cll'l1(trehmli\'C Plm by
pnrvidml: lilllher pnlicy t1UtclJon In implnnenl Ihe City',; UrNn Cml". nit
•
•
•
Pill c 421
rf~llIho 1ntC1~ ~klJ"l\'\1 UU)lIICU r:"," r,.wl 1 "To promlllc cil)"Aitk
a:lllltllllK: ",",'(IOI'"nclll; by pHI\ idirlJ: .lkIilionll' cUlployn~I (".IrK,I), 10
lliw('ll'y Ihe nnrltl)lIICl1I holsc. lhe pr~1 ;lltoo puy..idcs II rotH,:)! boU" to
11 .lorls;li,,! indll~rilll prup.."llId III t!\cit h;.II.h~ 1100 hc:;tt ll1C. lint! f)Cllil.1IC1
1I1D1'IY dc\'CloplKlII t1rw~ttfflollll~lId.
1. The rlC!f~flY j, roltnl;",ny d;&»lficd fllt Ihe rfj),~d lOOt hc:ltI.: l-equt;lil(d
1"'1I»U.J1I1 10 lIt< rot,ti~ Iol1 (uf Ihe ('ClllI!'I'chenSIIII: Nan. ",ld the IU~ rC'daulli~";lhon 1'';$ 111'( ~ili c.lIy eOluitkf'" allhe 11IIt< uf lilt lonl atQ
I;u,d lbO: .JIQlytol\ wnd "1(;1 JOllln~ /I.'S illnull of rcg'~! chanr.;cs In Ihe
JII.lonufadunnl! jotClc'r IImllk.:I)I(~IS m.&: by UoC'm~ 10 ..:unwtublc
~allun~ 011. JIOflion (lrlhC1f JlI~" .,.Ie Illiml(1 2 will'lIn Ihe new loJnd 11K
dcilt:ll3ti,.'I. !oJlwi '!'Cas IiWlIWfly uKd (<It p.lorkinJ; ~lId ~"'Ilons 10 wpp.w1
llIaflU(:tCtunn, or ailp:aM!Jlllrt no !O(I~n u.~ 10.. Ihl~ JIUl'J'C-'IK'. 11l1s
dpni:N (ift\jf1I~\lInCC h;u crealed Ihc OWU'hll'ut)' (Ilf Ihe (:,Iy U) ,C'o"cw l.tnd
U)C in the NOIlh Rt!1'on alt'oJ. ind\llJin~ JT."OJICIlics """,Ied by &tInt and
IllhCf privalcly O\lo,..rd p""eels in the imnvdia\c ncm:lylo deltfmlnc the
relicy du«iloo (Of fmlltc \is(' and U(\'Clopmcnl In 1''')1 llul .... uc nol
rlC\;omly IInalyted.
i(c'Wlllmcndalionr.
I. Atklj1lHln .ofa C0I1IJlfdlnui\'C I'lan bnd UJe 1Illlp amcndmc:nllnkSllj.lUlini;
Ihc 3 \II'XII: sludy IIfC:a 10 UfNn CaIlCf·N()(th. T1Ii~ ;\\.11011 ilK!uJn Borin~
Norlh Rcnlun I'bnl. rUl;ct SUllnd End.,;y prOflClI),. FlY' [10;1101110'
PfOflCfIY. ",nd ",,'(fa! J.lI1all (lm-alt bu)ino.>o. alOll!: I',uk A\'Co I'L indmling
Ihc \Vcmbll. WlrtllC)U. nnd Ullfhnb'1011 Northnn SJllt;i ~c Rl\ilr03d
rfOpctti~
2. Adoption or II new COl1lr.dlaUI\"( P'lan dc:sil;·TIlIII~. u r«{Il1I1I'1C1'1(kd by Ihe
NanninI! ComnlilSion In the drift \bled Ncrmtlbct I J. 200). The lell!
IImendtllcnl lC1S fotlll ,;,ion. objC\.1ivClltnd pohd~ rOf Ihe LkNn CcnICf'
NClf1h. lind ~ or iu dlAneu. nlc aistin; Center 1).)I'nl0'4T1 dciitn"t\Ol\ i ~ Icddi~ted \hbln Cmla • lJw.nICJ\/oTI. AmrotimcnlJ IIbo uJldlle and
cb.ri(Y ~Cf:al ('cnltf' policics It) t.: coru:iltct'll ""jltt Ihe nC"'" ck.sI~lIons.
and Jq'I('o1llhc EllIrlu)'IIItlll t'cnltf· TunsihtJn ","tCld.
J . /l.nlC'lld II~ ... 11irilll.,._.\m~ mar n(lhe ('ily 10 d,.lnt.oc lhe d,b.Slrl~lon uf
poptllY In Ihc UtNn C~ICf.Nnnh I~OIlCCty in tit< 310 bordncd h)' lhe
CttW ftwcrlo l~~n ""''C. 1'.1.. and Lake W .. sl\ln~OO Will be In the UlNII
CnlICf.N(YIh 2lUC'.N 2))00(. I'rorctt)' in Ihe lifO bxdntd by thc CN;i1
RiYCf on Ihc soulh. Gulko Ave . N .. N. 51h 51 ., OInd N 6th SI. \Ioill tc In the
U,Nn C:CIIICf .l-!(K'\h IlUC·N I) zone.
4. Atklill tooin, lullmmdlntlllS 10 ernie IWU fIC\o\ "lIIIIC dl,'IinJ, tnch-.lln.:
\L\C l.Jbtcs and Iwl~. anll dc\'tIOrIllCfIl ~ndalds u.hlt'S lind noto.
5. Adopt JWkinG ttllk antt>SlIlnlrtllS 10 addrtSJ padunj; nmis in the U(.'.N IIIJ\J
llC.N 2 tOO~. and anlC1ld .1~nJ.mu (Of 5h.trcd r·lIktn~ 11.11 ofT'llle ~1k.111~
rcquira!ldtl1-
(I. AIIlc1id U.illinll slle JlI.:m rCl,lulalions lu tkline al~hCllbl.li'Y f .... dc\otlO('nttnl
In the U('.~ I and U(.N :z lOOt'S. c:J111t..ailh the nan~ tiC lhe pQCCS.I U ~llc
l)c:\"t'IO('IC'Il('I\\ Pb.n." and chlln.,:e rcltmlt."'CS frulli Suc MAn lc-o-d I lind Site
l'Ian lC'l:1 II 10 Mul .... rlan and Sit~ rlllll l"rull~OU1 Renton MuniCipal
Cudc Tille IV.
•