HomeMy WebLinkAbout03686 - Technical Information Report �
�
V
�"� TECHNICAL I NFORMATION REPORT
Site and Building Modifications for
Ace Aviation
289 East Perimeter Road
` ,� Renton, WA 98057
�� (j1 �
�� � o
� � z
� � Prepared for:
� Ace Aviation, Inc.
�� 289 East Perimeter Road ,
Renton, WA 98057
March 8, 2013
Revised June 12, 2013
Our Job No. 15559
�(�' �� ��
)��RF�+AC�eS
�t•�� f��r.
aT + �► ,JL
i F'
'�/
p �'2769 :�
�' �'��ti , �:
S�U,� ��.
l•
4�yHA� -
S
mZ CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING
1 SZ'I5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 F�c
n �
i 2 BRANCH OFFICES ♦ OLYMPIA,WA ♦ CONCORD,CA ♦ TEMECULA,CA
s�� �y www.barghausen.com
>, �E
~G ENGtN
3 <08 �
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
7.0 OTHER PERMITS
8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT
10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Figure 1 —TIR Worksheet
Figure 2—Vicinity Map
Figure 3—Drainage Basins, Subbasins, and Site Characteristics
Figure 4—Soils
15559.001
�
W
�
�
W
�
O
H
C�
W
�
O
OC
a
0
T
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The site is located within a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 18,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, Ciry of Renton, King County, Washington
and comprises approximately 1.856 acres. More particularly, the site is located at 289 East
Perimeter Road within the City of Renton and on a portion of the Renton Municipal Airport. The
attached viciniry map gives the exact location of the project site. The proposal for this
development is to demolish a portion of an existing building and construct a new larger building.
Additional site modifications will include the addition of sidewalks, parking relocation, and
additional landscape planters and water quality features. The existing site is almost entirely
impervious surface, consisting of buildings and pavement, with the remaining area gravel or dirt.
Under the proposed condition, much of this gravel or dirt area will be converted into landscaping
or building, and the amount of runoff generated from the site will decrease since landscaping will
replace a portion of the existing impervious surface. This project does not propose flow control
nor is it required for this project site.
There is an existing conveyance system that routes and drains directly into the Cedar River
located northeast of and immediately across East Perimeter Road from the project site. Since
this project site is located on a portion of the Renton Municipal Airport, it is relatively flat in nature.
It is anticipated that minimal grading will occur and site grades will stay much the way they are.
Please see the existing and proposed site land coverage table on the following pages of this
report for a complete description of the site land coverage. As requested by the airport, water
quality to trap oils will be provided for this development in the form of a coalescing plate oil/water
separator. Please refer to the calculations on the following sections of this report.
�
;
I � �
15559.001
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE LAND COVERS
Existing condition of area to be modifie
Existing building to be demolisl�4u = ; �,u;�, �:
Existing landscaping to be removed = 820 sf
Existing impervious to be replaced with
either new impervious or landscaping = 15,046 sf
Total = 26,882 sf
Proposed condition of area to be modified:
New building = 20,478 sf
New landscaping = 2,064 sf
New sidewalk = 4,340 sf
Total = 26,882 sf
15559.001
T
�
W
W
_
�
�
�
O
�
�
H
�
�
w
�
�
C�
�
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND
PROJECT ENGINEER DESCRIPTION
Project Owner Ace Aviation Project Name Ace Aviation Site Modification
Phone DDES Permit#
Address 289 East Perimeter Road Location Township 23 N
Range 5 E
Project Engineer Ali Sadr Section 18
Company Bar�hausen ConsultinQ En�ineers, Inc. Site Address 289 East Perimeter Road
Phone (425) 251-6222 Renton,WA 98057
Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS
❑ Landuse Services ❑ DFW HPA ❑ Shoreline
Subdivision / Short Subd. / UPD ❑ COE 404 Management
� Building Senrices ❑ DOE Dam Safety � Structural
M1F /Commercial / SFR RockeryNault/
❑ Clearing and Grading ❑ FEMA Floodplain � ESA Section 7
❑ Right-of-Way Use ❑ COE Wetlands
❑ Other ❑ Other
Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION
Technical Information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans)
Type of Drainage Review Full / Targeted / Type(circle one): Full / Modified /
(circle): Large Site Small Site
Date(include revision Date(include revision
dates): dates):
Date of Final: Date or Finai:
Pa�t 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS
Type(circle one): Standard ! Complex / Preapplication / Experimental I Blanket
Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2)
Date of Approval:
200� Surface Water Design Manual 15559.003.doc[8/3/06] 1/1/OS i
1 �
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS i
Monitoring Required: Yes / N�
Describe:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN
Community Plan : Renton
Special District Overlays:
Drainage Basin: Cedar River
Stormwater Requirements: Peak Rate Flow Control Standard
Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS
� River/Stream ❑ Steep Slope
� Lake ❑ Erosion Hazard
❑ Wetlands ❑ Landslide Hazard
❑ Closed Depression ❑ Coal Mine Hazard
❑ Floodplain ❑ Seismic Hazard
❑ Other ❑ Habitat Protection
❑
Part 10 SOILS
Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential
Urban Land
❑ High Groundwater Table(within 5 feet) ❑ Sole Source Aquifer
❑ Other ❑ Seeps/Springs
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 15559.003.doc[8/3/06] 1/1/OS
i 2
K1NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS
REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT
❑ Core 2—Offsite Analvsis
❑ Sensitive/Critical Areas
❑ SEPA
❑ Other
❑
❑ Additional Sheets Attached �
Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet perThreshold Discharge Area)
Threshold Discharge Area:
(name or description)
Core Requirements (all 8 apply)
Dischar e at Natural Location Number of Natural Dischar e Locations:
Offsite Analysis Level: 1 / 2 / 3 dated:
Flow Control Level: 1 / 2 / 3 or Exemption Number
incl. facilit summa sheet Small Site BMPs
Conveyance System Spill containment located at:
Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor:
Contact Phone:
After Hours Phone:
Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Privat / Public
If Private, Maintenance Lo Re uired: Yes / No
Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes / No
Liabilit
Water Quality Type: Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog
(!n�I�dg f��ili4�i�Umm�r�i chect� nr FKarr��tir)n �n,
Landsca e Mana ement Plan: Yes / No I
Special Requirements(as applicable)
Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA/SDO/MDP/ BP/LMP I Shared Fac. /None ��
Re uirements Name: ',
Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / None
100-year Base Blood Elevation (or range):
Datum:
Flood Protection Facilities Describe:
Source Control Describe landuse:
(comm.lindustrial landuse) Describe any structural controls:
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 15559.003.doc[8/3/06] 1/1/OS
3
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Oil Control High-use Site: Yes / N
Treatment BMP:
Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No
with whom?
Other Drainage Structures
Describe:
Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION
� Clearing Limits � Stabilize Exposed Surfaces
❑ Cover Measures � Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
� Perimeter Protection � Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure
❑ Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities
❑ Sediment Retention ❑ Flag Limits of SAO and open space
preservation areas
❑ Surface Water Control
❑ Other
❑ Dust Control
❑ Construction Sequence
Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS Note: Include Facilit Summa and Sketch
Flow Control T e/Descri tion Water Qualit T e/Descri tion
❑ Detention ❑ Biofiltration
❑ Infiltration ❑ Wetpool
❑ Regional Facility ❑ Media Filtration
❑ Shared Facility � Oil Control Oil/water separator �
❑ Small Site BMPs ❑ Spill Control �
❑ Other ❑ Small Site BMPs �
i
❑ Other I
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 15559.o03.doc[8/3/06] 1/1/OS
4
K1NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE VVATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR} WORKSHEET
Part 15 EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Cast in Place Vault
❑ Access Easement ❑ Retaining Wall
❑ Native Growth Protection Covenant ❑ Rockery>4' High
❑ Tract ❑ Structural on Steep Slope
❑ Other ❑ Other
Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were
incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my
knowled he information rovided here is accu ate.
, s' � d �, ,�
�
Si ned/Date
,
�II
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 15559.003.doc[8!3�'06] 1/1,�05
� 5
� i ?.
�
a
�
�
�
z
c�
>
�
N
W
�
�
C�
�
�
(//���/� a`� gG nw � '�•r.�
;/F/ � R Q �'���i a pE
�� �� ,9 _���E �lASHING70N �T��, �= W � a � ,� , g y ■
} � � � - . �- �jN'
J
(� . �Nx � �� _
+*$r� ,t+` '� �E. . �tj. �t 1 �1h1N y 5 `�' m __` �
� [�" ��pR ° iF;l` OX/!CW f� I� sT y� � $ xE rH 7L
�� 1: I
y a O�J HE ��17iH ST
�i�� '�5 a S"' �112hi � ST - - BECN:AAC y � . �
� /i; E
� n� � ` 11J 57' �t y�' � Q . R
!nn Si S 11ATH � -$°' 1�TH �n .� RQ7W �..�� � q„
`vsa� sr 5 � 5 11aTH v'ST . Hk4JCl�itC -_ �'
�s 115 �5T � f AJ1d�qRT _ . :� . �
iP inTM n � S �a Q.. 11 R F '� � �� 8097[�YAICH r =g N 1DTii Pl
�s ttsn st 5 ' 16iH ST s / r A .. �.
9JIEJAG
Sr � �8 NE SOfN S7
�� m, � S �^ 117fH '"� ��a �� � � y � If 9TH P Me`n�
a f$ y
� nea� sr 5 c 1!8� 5 117TH PL � � HrWl z � y � t NE 'd :. g
/�
d� N N� ,> � � � � � � ME E
. � i�1 5 119TH 7 � _ � z � i � 3 t W � .
� S 120TH ST :�: a 1 , �
ST �c�q,7 x N STH �
�' x s �S 121ST Si„ -0 RIYfR �z �
�I s¢m- Q
� � 5 " 5 o I 122lD ST C 0 --- - , TRPIL �; � � c3� �r�a 6 R [
5 1= =S � 127fC1 ST� '� ��hM1i 7TN <i, � 5T E �� �. �
7P $ i'7�D SI 4 � � � � �1 F
7 4 Ti t UMfJ ' I
� �_ �^ � ' i 0.q t �3 amru:K ` n N �! 6TH 57 € i r L4 M R �i � •
S L JB�v� < �� "' �d p tTn sr� ' !' za�um z z �� � �'* n�o� kE 1 t
� � 3 � � nx .��eti st < '"'%i z z z T f� � c
. S � ��� �i �6� EJ1i! � t � EAi=-- � 4 c
� _ ❑ ua7�n � � 4r ^ �� H _n �,E.`� ,i:� - c`a'� iT �
� r J � c' 'd, 3. S�
i 4 $ - ac � � - Ylxo"�c�i/lADSO�P 'cacwt 'Y[
sr s i�rH � sr ��� _ � c � �. _ ,.� =-�s
w ' / ,.�
Y �4i �
ST a .� � .�ri c' i .. z � � < �
ti d N n �' �� � � N � � ^0
M � <1 C1111 � `� � ' `)
"\� �s s'c nem S� tr 3 � � �-
,� o ` � k� � m ` �
; � � ... � z� ao sT .. � �\ r . W � � �
''an x �� �o ,' 4 r�' 4, � Y�{c '
, � �D 3 m 1�,�� M � h' �t n �,� O � 3i
$ll2N1$T LtLa Ni 21D $ t-"t:oM f•';� S 3�1i'� 2N1 57� z G
si , K Ir�_�� ]I:1i�11 � � � `'• � w Y
ST +i S [ r N 5� ' K 3 MO � � 8 c
1�� � 4 � i t� r�crau ' a.N 4`4 ��,. f '�,, i,'; , n ^� E��� I
9 S , _ r
� ��Th� n «.�� �SITE � f
�e r P� � N \'.11 n,.iy `'�•% � � �?�t
n. WY � `�^ � �ro � _ N � . r- S$ �x QlVfT
- . �, � y ot � - f— � �< /u ,[c7�tP � �$ �ME7E0' 4.
.. 9 yy sn 3 v'J i i 1 t � -c+ cp SE �p PL
� � �.�c ; 4 r.� 9 a .r{� � 1 �'[ER � Ff.w
� � ��en ��... w ��::",'„j ¢, K '�' �` g �
- . �y� t � ■ i--- 4+
�_� � 3 � � � � -+� �A7 �... • ,p y � tiY
� AC N 5 3fD R � �' �r� Y vo ` ,cro s$ s
� ��y.. �c � � ; j„ c +'r ,�, e
a,ryEa � � � s � �� Sr �Q �. m s ��r�
f01,�ST y �� ��
K a $:
.. �wrxT �/3 �r �a.o r! � . Vt5 , Q �f . a 9f T� �
.�u �V .k TN ST � � \ �c;� C�v-
•_ , ' -- � ` • � � ,� �i !� --.n RIYFS'Id
run `s � R � �a� t y: y Q �., • 'S oTa�r -7, a'r'x �
� � J w `�
i �R i� 65Y �S 6 ST ' �� � � WX A a N � '��1T,N ^- �
� 9i TfH '^ 3 CH� 5 T Sa �_... o . ._..
♦ �' �v=i � � `, VS ',\.f aTM ➢ � . rEDAiP
'�,_'-_, " W �` �Q` � � ` � � .; � �r oa 5�
�-oi�'. 'a i '^Q I � �,r � � �9TH S'`�P1L'L�:.� r N� _/1 aSN�
J \
Wy � =I =�� f� ��� oa P� ,�,�
''1 � St �i 4- car� °
S RDlRJN YILL/GE AR R
��� .�: IZid lO[IDM � I�i,
IkY �
N �Y V' l�H .
5[ Sf �y �
� � �
N � 6... �t 4 ��
... \ '2 ,cru I ��� N 5 E �t A 5T�1 � '� � y4 u C°fTf ,' Q ( 1
o �+ �
REFERENCE:Thomas Guide(2006)
Scale: FOr: Job Number
Horizontal: N.T.S. UeKical: WA ACE AVIATION 15559
GHAV 1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� n► s� KENT,WA 98032
m �? Z (425)251-6222 Title:
� s � (425)251-8782 VICINITY MAP
?
a� �'�', y' CIVIL ENGINEEF2ING,LAND PLANNING,
�T'ro�_M1_,NE�'P SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES DATE:03/06113
P:U5000s1155591exhibit�.graphic5115559 vmap.cdr
I
`
�
r
�
, .,.1
. '�
'
I
� FIGURE 3 - DRAINAGE BASINS, SUBBASINS,
AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS
1 I
�,� ,�,` �, ��l � � ,,,�ig TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY � Z �
*� IB ���i ^� � � A PORTION OF THE NE1/4 OF THE NEi/4 OF � � O
� �`, ���' "'� SEC.18,TWP 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. � � Z
�} �N � i � � CffY OF RENTON, K{NG COUMY, WASHINGTON � _
� ���z I� SI'TE w
1 � pPGHq`st� I I� � Q
�� �m 2E � �� 3
�, ;;c�'o',� � LLl
I�Q' V�, �'_,' � �a�.� � � tn
�s��}i� � ' �l = � � �
�'y s,oMsx � ',� ' c I�J� CA � �
,� � � � 8 �
� � � �'��� i i � V � � �
v�xa ana N � j �'�.� � ✓ � Z V
�,\ y
d „ 7 =
� � � � � �I \� �`�\� �-Jl ,�r� k �� S i Q Z � C7
� N Z
j� � s so n. � `��. _ - �� o zo ao ao E � = 0.. Y
�rra►i waseiarorr ^�� `' F- �
V1C�&fYAMP �� ssu�e �!\ -�. \�� . �LSra� /� C, SCALE�--�A=- � O O 0
NT,fl ��\ s�r d� `�`r\iccess s� X. ��Y I����•� •/ � y � _ ` � Z �
� �c,T *� ,�o ��;:'J � r/'7/n � � � � �V = �'` W
� � � f � r��f Y �� `O �V �
`\2�\ . ���1 j '.�. �"\ \�� �� lL
?�+ ':�� �**��,' � HORIZONTAL DATllM - B0.SIS OF BfAPoNGS: _ O � O
(S, ''J �..,- ., �.� A L!�BEIWEFN CIIV 1 f��TON H09�OMK dMi9L PoIM 4D.10Y9(A P FlAi 9VSS DN( n
�� tG����i•.r . . �.�� MM PUN01 W�Y ON CON(SfIE°Cn Y�'.'�AI�JR Af IlahiffCi�l OF S 12bM 5�.A'fl B�PI _ 4L
� 7 .�. ��, q, AYQAE 5.)40:T'OF RENION HCRI.t.'il COtFROI fYM h,^,.1236 ia"GBN MiM CA'I\ �
jQ� ' � ,� S�=�N � . \ ��?i��9 q '..N��T�_�MERS�CT.1�.."�"�:1R M9A[W'A:.\W tll Si�En TMFN AS
INVERT TABLE � r``4�, �� ` ,,�eA, 5\��\ � '�' ,' \�� � a U
�� '' �`� VERTICAL DATUAi - NAVD88 ~
,��. wcw.xcxu_aaocc wax x�vx m,ex rcw errt+�cc r�z�aM ti:r3r. crr y
ce-, aw��s.�5 ir mrc nw=u.ca t -.._. : � �` ��u��`\�.� - ��?'; rra�a w�x�s ooc srw=cT tc�cz isi,Y N�or o�souni�m or caw,.,x�q;,�c�
' .1M
CB-8 fiY 1i5B 12 CMlC li-A.]6 � . � . :. .
CB-C RIY JE95 IC CONC A1=27b6 :,•."���-ry+�q -...-.F�E ,17 y ��j fe"NION�4RIM'A'WMaO!Ppf Ip.212C(PiGF F}6) EFI.=l'.:51 i:E'.
fE-D RN=,70.76 C�'C MI=3851 I�. I^%.L) ":L£i'F� ..� ... k gJ`� •t �� NAT�J7 VILL'
/ � '_ . ?�:.,� ��_( DATES Of SURVEY: o�zs mc cav,rm�iH Ha�a�+.ze�z
' ��r� ���/ �J ' :)' ���� \GC \\� � /��NUWRS 40MM�OLNu N M9r0 AT ilUT iME Q
C B-E W N.2 9.T T E C O N C S E=i.C.7 1 � G !�.' �'� \ �
3i.a r car sr=nss � � � �� 9,9 PR�mUR�E /,!JARRATNE:�:3uric��.�r�;.c���,s ws s..�FF�avrzo O
CB-F 2N= Si'N � I i �' �'� O
IY CONG SE.T3] {r. i FF
� \ ��n�I6 � . �,��-�..5����R,�S�,���,���,�� o
iz•cx+c�[=n.0 � i, ''z` � �•�. `.� \ ow++r ar v�-r¢ucnuicn�rxo�-n nrs ud irPo.vgn�s:�+ rxvar �'��rs � �C
ce-a �w=ai.m r cac�=z�s �^r �.. - � ,�.. -•� �'� � �.:��s nc sah;s'ms roa wm wurann s_��ms.a s� ov-�x ne.:.uz-iw-0so. F
r mnc sr=n.� p uru_r i ,_.---T' . �r=a:� r � Z �
E �itr / i ^ALCULAiED LfASE ARFA �
CB-H IEY.3131 S Dl SE.2].fiB I - ���,✓ +T� �; �. � sw 3- ` ��"". ���/��. �\tr� 3o.as::wuAe!-¢r (i.asbt;,cr�'i Z W Z
CB-�i RM=7/99 6 PK SE.2E.58 4lS �.lT-� � -�S� '�:-. v `��)P+t I � � � � a''�' TAX ACCOUNT NU4BER: Q LLJ =
��uue� S�Hor��a -,� � J ����'� ':� ..+� r�.arrt:o�zm-3mr � � Q O
S COMC YY:26.13 � �wu �a � !� �.. ta.�oaiE oEc� � � � � � SfTE ADDRESS: Q �
�,`� 4B8 L'ST Pr7EM7Ei RQ�D �
CB-J PoM=2721 lY 7'?9l=ID.� - : �•� y� \� ��SCIUfH FF a 3f.4 � �' \� � W � �
17?+?NE=2Lb3 !4)WAhli V�L`hS-� I ���.{ (3)BO 1A705�' W-N � ��. RCOF P" \ � �� « s�'-" aEniax,rwe�r:rai seos� � �
, , ��� �,��� � � � � J =5,., ��� � 9��� ,�, a � o
�uu av wvEa uwac To��vc a� �c�re
e-Rm�c 9 �-S+.+e a'cae s=xs mwc.aAc- � ce-« � '� � ���.�+ '� oFLEaO�ZaNEE C��zo�5�u�x��u uw�wav sxc�n r.a.wa W
L-� �� "'��-�N� �0.]. :� .� : � q+ \`,� � '?� a?7 A 1725.ffiECM 6VE WY 18.1994 U �
-°-�rc 0 PJI=7055 e'd w.zs.w �� � �r },� � - . � \ . �� � T'•_���. . y-� £�� ,�'ra .'�, �-E m�� -atu_r.uro�-rms onw�m a ll,� �J,J
:a�9 aa�=x.�e s'a s�e zsx "� � - j��a�r ase ,c_-' \ �. :?g�1,, � � , , ��� �-B �
ar
\ L� FIP.E�M.T . , RYJF 1�FAM - 'e IDIE I 191k7E�) -hR',lS iF`+'U�FAR iW'1},ARfAS OF I W-1F.W ROOU RYM AVERME �
t2'q MI=79.15 y,� � I u.+l�- .��"'�G3-M : � .C6(P �NC'E Eq)� r FAR
l'9 • a -(NO f�U•.Dj ':. �,.� -SB.9\ �\ 1�. '� /c . �� �IIhiE Ii�,'HO hF�/5 TROiECIED BY!EY-5 FrmM 1S NNAM1L (V
C9-N(TYPE tl) lal.511J `]'d Y=]H9] ,� ..D�'::PJJ � PAFN�:J2V. � �, 6. � � �\ ICN CIMH.F�W
/ � � �
��.r a n=zan � " \�. -- .:��� � .'�' �L�� �s�„"�-` F ¢� .• : ��1' �.zon[x(xo sunr's)-xrtws��wonm To ff ou�soc-rua n000R,w
sow-A aY=xs� ....� �-� , ' - � :� �\. � � �� wr oa5 n�r wu�rt*Tu in�;.��w rnvs nur ti�s.�a�cr ro nmwvc. �
uwac ra aa x��ro�rc ,� � .. wE- �C9�P 40io0�D�/ i "�' "�"�-� : , � '�li����� p�'� ��4-- \ \�
m�e+-s w=m.�e ir mnc rr�=z4.0 ��" ' 3n 1�� \ \ � �oN Z,�.N�c�»unaR�nc�nNa-�uw�aNiaDUSTRIAL (IM) LL
� .� � F MER S.,f.�L� �
7r ov� 2r ax�c sE. � ; �x � �: . �� - .�r . - �` \ .. \\ � tlG
27.:8 I . ` '.� �� `.� FND.l'APrif.�CE&Ll4 YIB�LKS ,J,�
a�iu.wor raao � �-iwM er� �'.o�sz� ��.."' c� �.., �' � �- � ,. � � � asK«/vna sr�e� �ur is�r(•) o!+ d�s
_8�'EP. CiE )-� _ � ' .�••'.. � ��/' 1lt'.GEO.SU91EY.i- 19--3' IEIR 0 iEE7 ? �! o
411N-A fAI=29.71 21'?COML SE.1757 J/ ' .� __-\ (4] OU�r �.� �^ � � ���� ��� �.1 -:� �jIY DF R�Jl77N i�2130 M9dAI 3'E YIRD 0 fEII i m� z
(�)'NAIER VrYV6 , � �� _ . �y, :.�D'E4 . �.� ( )
24'7 CONC NII.17b1 -" . ,-4 . � `.�CB-.7 E7� �s � J,"� . . ' � -
. . ,t 1 I SI�ET SI�EYNtlI IS fF'Ti . m�<
SAIH� RN=2?.C2 2C7 COML 91=16.41 . . . .�� .f, ^. \t _ t�`� t�C �_ff �9CN YJJc&.T1NC If]Qlf NdE(') i v c+
� .�- �r��•�-._.y��1` `� � � � ���:\�"^ .f'�� (•) S9 iDOT SE'H�LN VEAUfID'�kIUfING A R�LFNIVL 0.SIRICf Q,"' V
219 CONC SE=tEi7 WT`i YAN'�OLE-��� J�'C i �� i., k "1''�r" ('l wvccr srt s��s�annN nc uua�r iwu�:ce utu stimr za+E s u+o/oa e �� �5 02 �
�uv�r caro zrr co�c xx=i�az+/- rm:'r�a.�.b vv�o<x< or._uc•.- ��� � ��- .� � �:�, ���� '��' C-� ' '��� SIDEJIE IPPRQIGG/�EPFRILfS Mti M!D/OR lA.�fFIC PAiiQd ZO�E'. Hf]Rli 5�'I�IG7FJ p (C`��' ��
m
q�TER rAL�E 9,.��V!h= ..�1 \ �.' RO
IYI7N 1-1/4'BRAi� C9 C- - I, \� u+` I �� � '� . N l�5 ARFA Ht TYE FM P0.9f 77 9hKPLE NffA
d5C M/PNC��i , PJ'a'EP YLE 4GN� - ��� '`\y���� � :
a
I +„-ur,� r � � � r y PARKING:
' � � �. \'� �' 1 y .i�at,w sous
. . .. .. . i �asEx s�;nJ � ��� .;�y-�;i.... i i aaxat rn¢sruL _ -
SR
�� 1 '� �.1 �WN�.'RfTF MAE: OIER AfdAS�NOf SPEf?YIL.:'Si�m MtE LS1 wlt PASGVG`FJ�FS g �
5�� 5-' `J II � � �/� MMl�N - __ . .. . . '� �
(�T� � PaDG: �
� �
,_ �tn, ���,�k'I� �''�_ s � S�RVEYORS NOTES:
t ,� , _ ��
irwwnr- �. .�. \�,� � � �.m-s s�rn n�rxtsFns�afrsrx wa�ort cadrrous Frsrwc w na�ffx. , �I �I `'
R,
�''��""..�` , �,� X112.Nl 4MVEY COMROL iM]?A"E➢AS f0U1N'Al5 RETAYiAFD PoR MS P.Y'u'ER Ai'1417 I � �
SdYH-A r. _tl�b � SiP,E�T 71YE � � 'E r �
L,ifi
�8 Jsy�pp��• '���u �a I h t k�����_� 2'�IIIN!6 0'H7 TiNI`MCSE SrtlM IY,F IX6f 01f THIS 41_'�NLY TMRSE LlL'IFS F'M �$ E � a � -
1
�. _ � . �` :1 ENDEMCF JF�41�i INSIP3Ui:N�l.`.�T GF�LND 9N61LE ME 9NTN1 HFF�GV.N.7Au M'H Y S ;
i 4 ai � UCEA�'n.^�NU TItP.Y_CGGPJIS AS 4ti1(m B'M!OL7S�=COMfitOL'UK Ut&lE9GflWItlO U�I-:fY
C
L E G E N D "� : r �� »Mt i l.Y/.'13iS SIOMY ARE�PPf�AWE�.r.UI�EPGTJJIO CON1L'ipMS PiE 9NT��S S1RWi11 N
I"=\ �� >�.F �M�BEINEEM S.i�ICE If!Ill'T.OpT+NS hci 111!COATNN BJW pt GR�fS Iq'FOWlI. = C'i Vs
\y � � � � �� B+RIiW/5�1 COIISJ�:�RS. MA�RS L+1A1IY F➢R 11E fCi,'.JR1LY OF Pu3l1C Q Z W
43
9 wxr nw�[vr Ns xo�l 1�1I ' aEco+cs rn2 oa,Kaa�cY ai r
I� � ?06["R nl'l1 i{�' 3 ' � UUERG0.011D t111111'S 5H' 1 IElEON.. � ��n
� � � ¢ YC47N[OHfrR(�5 YOIEL') = S , . ,.ai as�+�ccs ua�r��r.er Ns.suar�p. w �
m�ora,wu Q ��b; _"" � Q s�
�W 'p7E.Y VM0.! O iN6 9RYE7 IMBQR i���J � � 7 !/ _ '� �.'HS 9AYCY iiENSSEMS A PN:PCSD IfASE NEA MIO 006 A'�CONSf1UIE�IEdL Ai. N L�
j4"'` :.MS SIfE IES X7I�YN 11E 90UNIWiES aF i�Ni011 WMCP/J.IIA°099�M:J IS S1.B.FLf tt7 kl a O N aN0 ti¢
0-� S�TT IKilf ( �
j dc5'PoCIC:S MRJGBIE hERRO. 0 4]cV h W�
CO lilf 1[dR �A�VYii �l ..(�e^ 2 O��O a0
�` Ykhl ithT �� 6.i�F�ENCE WK N I I
7 iG11Qt IfTi ��, ♦4J�rEY B/'J.W�E HMNl4 NO ASSQCM7ES 9EFf CE.ORFD 1�16/2](I6 n 3�� �c�
Pd1EA PolE ���E � d.fAA SURJEY Bf'M PM7F1C.JOB MII�'A 31E�4 WED 8�!/20'2 � N N w Li
41ff 1Pik ��u�N >
. ...-., . I N Z
.. . ._... N N �fL
o--�� '.R�`FL'Sq14 . 00 W
Sq �GL06 C< Z�
�
� _ : X � it/V �JD � r Y� ��,
� ��,�, � ,E r 51'i GD �IO �
� � ��;.� I -� _=�,�,�� �
I ''L 'E7Lq1bE YlA+Rli(irfl -9-ROR1 ptMNctE J1k /� } �
I ❑ piCi 861N(C6) :_x_ GlW 11M FEMCF P'�_UG M'/PNCH AT N'I%OF � �S .
FN�4a4 GONL AqN MifH�!e ���I ��� (N � �N
O uvTMC.iMQt YJNIAfE 1-I/- IAIXi fD[' S.RRFY14i WI�Y 8 L7C?N cF 5. �v
(maq i_.a_ six rma (c��n oF a�r�io,�se) J ��'y �
I o SW�M^'SEIDEIt GtEYDL7�SSCO)'' ' _6411m RIL�AVD WA ` z
EI
� 615 rE?�I{41� �_�_ MTJt W PNnlYY06 � ' �. v ''�
� rwirn waE(w� ..-�- G�s rw ewmw.a I SURhYOR'S CERfFlG7E � I
yJ
ca ����, -,- ,�,..� m���� bb8��o� I
A ��,.n�� -Fc.�- ���
O enx w�xac(n�xj � u�ermic�iao�ur�iuo ra�xnmr��is�o�orurtrox6s�s�ic
e� r��[n�x feq i-R°"7- ww¢w ra�uas �; �or n+e ove a nc rc�n wx�r. j :
pQ RAGra�wLVE(uMj i ' �
\\ D uvwe¢o mux i I � T I .
a �
�� MD�' Iq"il'S1iE]��RL 0.�'Et N N�^?JM'�` / iPE'A�S.:.4YmS.'15. 2�7_
Ygiti;1�N p[��Ti/.X1N Iq.45]99 -
� � '� �3 � PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
� -� ..� �R ��V,E!-1�P�
I 3 � �'.� � �`�a'•..>< ��
� p � ����� ������, ACE AVIATION p�,q�rn1 .rr�
� �.�..
� � o ,5 3° 6° �'�'� .;.� NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TWP.23 N., RGE.5 E, W.M.
's.�„-a � \ GTY OF RENTpN, KJNG COUNTY, WASHINGTON
d. F.�.Jn2E.'.2� �`. � \�. �
� ' F=1cA2(24 SM) \ ��. . ��
I( i=1E.i7(24'S� �\ \ �\
� _ � ����� �� � � '�.� � � � ,�� v,�v��L�°�nl6
;
. � \\� ACCESS SIG4 � � �
0 0 ? g `�� _ ��� �
Z � % ��� ,<s �` �� I
., �¢� Z W "o; . j' �*.ry t `"+` `�
� .� t � � \ :\
b �
H
. �
C7 .
�y
z` / .� a �� � , ��\
5 W?i C�3 Q �*�s��_ fZ� i `� \ � , • •� � \` � cs-�
a�Z >' ¢ ---ss —ss���a� \� ` / ,� ✓.`,, 18. n �g9�
� U W� �d � ` ,��a,I� � `:.� ; �—x— ,,/;,;_ -:\ `. .� �.�\��
_ Q a.� � p A' �� 7• ,V YIV °'�'� X�s� � / \? �'�\_ ���\�^°
� �L�1 w � �1� „�� ,J ,�s�„ ^� �+ ���\
� � al I 0����' �,,�" '/ `��4�� F-� � � . � 3 5\ ..� � �?\�.
I BUA�7MC /` �'T� '� \ �� � �\
� `�' \ � ' � I �Fti-y�''�+.. \\-�
97J1A0 ���� ��! � Y P� ..A����
����. ,�' -ti � ��N � ,� �\� wam+va:�r
/ .� � � IX.ODf.V ASSELIBLY
� ' �4�. � � \ TO REMAIN
�, ,h- / o� V ��Op00� ,,, ,� �r��r � � ��O
�s,a+ ���r=� . � � ���. K� �n"``�\ .9
m �� �� .3x � � '"- � �' -� > �V� �,��� 9
" �� � "� •h NEW ASPFMLT PAYENENi �� . \ \r \ �/G .
,� �-N„�d ��� �/ . � f�, � ;a�, �`�� �� c�`,9
� O p o wu�i n / ,Y,ano,p ' y,wWr � . � � \
E"'� 3 E�7877(tYM / �. '1 . -� ., .,� LINE /� ` � ,i � , '��� \ \
� •_ '�`4 NEL �Y xT / .w //�/ �/J -) ��� F?S?� �O `� ��',
�� � (4�NAir'A. ,T GAS GM;E k ��� YJd1LT � I I�I ,� Elc'C BO �� ` \`��
W � vAlV6 j ,;0.5 6�tlWOL1�� � .:. 2 �`�- ..�`�"T` ��\\
F4 � � �'� Fu�. o�-�11..� ,. � � FFe(qC ����rri�n. � ������.
�m c,s�u,.r—.,� :�`i ��n sz.ze ���z.°B�(yyJ����• M` � �'„� `����\
(�/� FlRE l't \`
rn .�j f' ���Y SPPoNKIER �. � \\\\\
-�+ _ � ;� � RooM � qj \ �`�
� -y �� c I " � � \ ��
o .� w � ```��� �� .,� �\\��z:'-
a .. � '' � . `� \ ro5.��.. \ � �\\ i .� s[' I
i� ., �` _ i 3 fi6 � .... ... �� Q� ��^ . . .
- a` � r 31 `� `+�/ /. �� . ._, \ .L�O.�� �.a.\\��
3,j r
i'• �B \�\ �s-E
_ �� � - ��1 I I:�:�.� � , ��yB'�G� POWER \ .�Q� �\ .\ PoY=2BJ2
33 0 \� � �, � f I t, F�s�,�l,k., P�:E � .���\ E=2E22(G� .
€� ,�J � \N s :\ � Fg � 3y�J � � � _
�" �� �� �' :'J ;��� F � ��,: �\ 80. ,� ,.\ �` � soux-e
� rvhu � �,.` � � :� �� ,,: '�:. ' �, � � ra�z9.�a
� i k;oo�'' -3f /_ \3�126 \. q�-.���-�q. \ ` \� �\� �`� IE�24.43(12'Nn .
.� � �l��� � �h� i � :.� � \�; "d,�� ,1 �',.� �y� \\\' �.aE1LT.1B(24'S� n
��� ' `� � \ ��Hc'a� f�� f ''Ptyy,•�� ;+\ s., p � s�cn
�,€� e \ �� R t � -. Y�i' �� \\S\ �' � \ �'��r -'\y � � �
G 3 � �i ` � 516N ��,
I �� m �.� , � � ��f.S.` F,(�yi f .'' \\ \ .. ' \��u ',�,• �\\ \\\\\ �
� . '� \ �=2934(B'� � �i {�i £#i �t'c�f S: •� � \\ \ , �l � \` \ �
wel �-ss.is(�2'nw) � ' dly �t a at�eS 3e�' ' � � � ,� ��
a i, ( i(� "'�„n \ �,�1 a. '\•
':ZJ � �a.� �� � � '; �� . f ` ;i`t�� \ \ \ \ �`'-/. ' 1 ,g \���� �\���\������! �� - �
vex �. �w �
� � MPRO%M1KT�LESSE IA�.E(iYP1�j�� SAWCU( — Y T .� \•£ .` a� \\ \ �\1 BR:DGE � �
� ��4)WATER '-" , SEE NOTE 58 u� _ _ �x w ` � $ 'r.f`.�\ '\\.\\\�\, r "\�
vrLVES L:Gir 50.SE __ IXLSTING AC TO BE -- �' Pc „�. �� ��Z �� � e� \`�{ � \` 1 D6K W/FNCHO STFIIPED �
II. �,l GROUMD��f40 WtRLAYEU / I I qy,,, \ \ � F '\ , F •NAT.GEJ.SUfA'EY.R-4 1973�
� � a � �` ' __ - --- -- � , \�" �atie i uaurs �y,. � '� �\� � 1 _: �C ) -
5 � i� � I�,4 WATE�!APNiOLE I •'"� % CB-K�TPE 1 i�' POWER," �'' �s \ � � � � ., m ar aExrara m zizo Q
___. - IE�T&3t(B'S) /a� �\ 1',, � � � � �� \2�. \�� \\� f I �. ,.
I a cB-L�rre� '---1�""°'x�"T„s---"'. i '`� � \ I � I% ��X \�'�` � \ ' � 1 I�y �stR�r� o
� WAifR VALVE • • �
a PoYa7�S5 �°' � �1 � . ,i LIChiT' P
< E=zs.so(a'rn� /',� —� ,�,� '` 1 I I ' � '�"`� ��v�_. � � i'-,t� � a
%'VD 4K4 CONC MQN� Dc6'IING ��1 1 1 rw 6' 1 � �`.�� �' ��f� n
W \ �
�- i o 'KTH 1�3S/C4��� ���m 1� � 011tl.DNG PCWFR POLE SIGN' `/ ` ;` \� ' a ��1 � • ��-• �
m.• o
� M/CUY WIRE t C 3 �� \�'n - '- /. �
} / I% 8'r� \\ 1' �� ��y. •�ae s r r"�stii :j c
I m 'Y" t7 .��+' -.-�{� -:.i �
� � iEL R6ER 4CN �'�� J`� ' � I .p : y` -f;l�.d� ' ..
�CB-C 1 0 ' Y ��.� : �
I SIGN ��� ., CGN�RETE
$IGN \` 'e $ C 1�� �''.-�.1- WAll Jti
,���p \ � y�fi o BR�OGE �
i �\ �c ne r ..,o .� � n
�-eox y, o
i q� \A '��;,-' 1� � _
� ��_/ �'' �� , �� - ! -
\\ aa� \` � , - '4 S7RiEf
Z 7'�' _f ° .n- .
� "Wi-A \ � (\ � �� �
� t1�.iT
Zi . � .�; � 1t ...�' � (.`.�.,:,l,�a`..p-� �
� ., , �
�op� � CITY OF RENTON ,'�
� P����A,�n� �� Hq �EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �
I 243 W.PERIMEfER ROAD G �
K- Bq� . '� RENTON,WA 98055 � � PRELMINARY C�iADING AND
CF'Eq�FOR CO►pLJANCE c���F NA- (425)228-9510 �Q� ��j,,�i $TOFiM DRA�IA(�PL/�N O
�� �Ca"��� TO CfTY SfAPDAFlDB OP�� �^< COHLACT:BERNIE OR�IANE PAFiOLKE -7
FdFi APPROVAL ^ �' r�Jp�;
� BY � BARGFWISEN CONSULTING ENpNEERS n ' �.. ACE ANATION O
N r 18215 72ND AVENl1E SbUiH � ? °E�°� �
OCe y p�7E 03/06/t3 ��p, �
BY �� 25672 EO 4,e KENT.WA 980.32 'rG �� h' duwv MOY
� i o �, Date f�IS,E0.aG�`t�" (425)251-6222 `T�'�'GENG�N�c�� c+2[.�c� DKB scn� 1'=30' paoBooe PAGE_ W
L I ' z �NAL E (425)251-8782 FA7( U
i oa,� coraracr:�,w auuau a'"'°"� s�T� °F. 5 Cp
P:\15000s\15559\preliminarv\15559-pqm.dwa, 3/7/2013 1:48:50 PM,\\MERCURY�Oce TDS700 - main CAD
�
J
�
�
�
�
W
�
�
V
�
�
$ � - 3��_� h ����� #� �
-� f � m.�t � � � .� �; ��rt ta-r' ; ' 4��rm.P
.
- -a _ - . ,� �il �s � �
. "'i
;
�� � � , ,.�.��� .` . ': ,.:; ` � � �r tl ,. _
�' � ' � � � .� �r
� .
. _
- ; . _ � _. .. x ,�
# . � - ...� �F
i�
_ 'S �� 1' ._ �., t� ��
. . � - � e �. . �`
� � � � _ � s _ _ �_ _�i
`� y � i. S'� a + s !-7
L . �_ � . � 5
{ e < I
���J� . t "y� 't� �V � �� t r� t* � ; _ }•i' � ' •
. c�?' . f e�; �� } •
. , � ' ' _ � .� � � � � I
K ,�..s. 1A � � . i��� _ �i�i � �1t� � t '�*.
,' � = S,._ �, .. - 3:� � y'_#'.._} 4�g .�I ..
s
•. . ��'
�' ' j i �
� � t
� : '� _
. �" � * '��� ���
l� � ✓ F� _ r F ��- 44� � ��i{ 1 i�;� �- � � � ,�
�` �_ `� - � �-�_��,+
� � `�� � � � .�� .:� v�. .� .�
_ � � ��� `�{j� � � �.�¢ \ �, 9;r �..
�� � '-.'� � � . '�A_� .t
e .
i .' �S itf �s, . _ .' E a.���II* �t - �
, � � .. --. . .
.. � ` .�,,@ :� ` '
�
.
�
' �
. : . � SITE—�' �' �, 1 *
` � � � , - � �1 , ' �
i�- � �=� � � .� � -� �
�� \�.T. . ? � _ � :l _
�, ��._ ��� .. . __ _ _ _
� __� �__
� . � . ..
. _._
� �,� , - - F . .
_ _ : _ �.
� _ � � .� _ : , �- - �
� � . �--
�k �� � � �; - . ..����
\',:� � " . ' .� _ , E� ;
f�� �3� �----- ° >,�..� ,} < � r j�j' ,�,` :�lr �l �E.�'
��'����5 r,�'' � - '� ,. - . ��_. ��� '. 1 � ! /�
_ 5 ,
` -'� ty � ' !' ; �d � �.+ ` �� �I aS . 1
� `� �`���: � �" � =� � �,� �, ,; � _� _ 1,
�� � o � �� _ .. '�- -� .�'�"��� �r¢ � ,i��
t���} � _`f . _ - F
� �
-
_
� � �
',��� �`�; ' � �_ } _� _ � q : -
f� � � �. _ . _ �� �� '� '
.
�. r� „ , ��-.�� ,
_ _ , ;_
: A. . � -
. �
\:_�... .. � �� � � � . . . ... i �����i µ � �
i
'�. � _._' t �. , � : i . t
REFERENCE: USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
LEGEND: ''
Ur =Urban land '
Scale: FOj;• Job Number '
Horizontal: N.7.S. 1/ertical: N/A ACE AVIATION 15559 I
�yHA� 1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� �►I s� KENT,WA 98032
m �� Z (425)251-6222 Tltle:
� S � (425)251-8782 SOIL SURVEY MAP
0 2
s` ���'•� y,
�T �� CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING, DATE:O3IO6I'I3
NC ENG�N� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
P:i 15000s1755591exhibii�graphicsl t5559 soil.cdr
2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY
2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMEN7S S�:aF�jli9:a,=�'.`
Analysis of the Eight Core Requiremen���
Core Requirement No. 1 — Discharge at the Natural Loca4 ;.- � ' ' -
into the same conveyance system it does under existinc
immediately adjacent to the project site.
Core Requirement No. 2 — Off-Site Analysis: No off-site analysis is required for this pro�ect a:
it is an already developed site ard the City is aware of the downstream drainage course from th��
project site. !, _
the project si?�
Core Require��ien� i�c. .5 - �iovv �:on�.ro� � n�;�; ��vu� u�; iess �n���,v��uu� �ur1G�c ,or �,'i��c �ru��,_
site after being renovated than there is under existing conditions. Also, since the site lies in thc
peak rate flow control standard of the City of Renton, this project is exer, ` :.� � �'- . .�., �
runoff leaving the project site is less than there is under existing conditior
Core Requirement No. 4—Conveyance System: New roof drains will _ _ __ ._ . __
conveyance system and runoff to the project site should be less than existing conditior
redevelopment is complete. A conveyance analysis is included in Section 5.0 of this TI'
Core Requirement No. 5 — Erosion and Sediment Control: ESC measures will be f�::_...��_a
this project site, including specifying clearing limits and providing perimeter protection along thc
downstream perimeter of the project site. Also, catch basin protection being instituted to prevent
sediment from being discharged into the downstream drainage course. Bare ground exposure
will be very limited at any one time on the project site during construction, due to the fact that this
is a re-development project.
Core Rec�uirement No. 6 — Maintenance and Operations: This project will concur with all
maintenance and operations requirements of the City of Renton. An Operations and
Maintenance Manual is included in Section 10.0 of this report.
Core Requirement No. 7 — Financial Guarantees and Liabilities: This project will concur with
all financial guarantees and liability requirements of the City of Renton for projects of this nature.
Core Requirement No. 8 — Water Quality: This project will have less pollution generating
impervious surface than under existing conditions. However, water quality will be provided in the
form of coalescing plate oil/water separators for treatment for oil prior to discharge into the
downstream drainage system,
Analysis of the Six Special Requirements:
Special Requirement No. 1 — Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements: This project lies
within the City of Renton and must meet their amendment to the 2009 King County Surface Water
Design Manual. The project lies within the peak rate flow control standard and is in compliance
with this standard.
Special Requirement No. 2 — Flood Hazard Area Delineation: This project is adjacent to a
flood hazard area for a river; therefore, the flood way is shown on the plan.
SpeciaN Requirement No. 3 — Flood Protection Facilities: This project does not rely on an
existing flood protection facility, nor is it required to construct a flood protection facility.
Special Requirement No. 4— Source Control: Source controls are being applied to this project
site by educating the owner about the proper use of pesticides and fertilizers on the landscaping.
In addition, this parking lot will be swept up regularly and the trash enclosure will be covered to
provide source control protection.
15559.�01.doc
Special Requirement No. 5 —Oil Control: To the best of our knowledge, this project site does
not exhibit the characteristics of a high-use site. However, oil control is being provided in the
form of coalescing plate oil/water separators to treat for oil as required by the City of Renton.
Special Requirement No. 6 — Aquifer Protection Area: This project site does not lie within
Zone 1 or Zone 2 of an aquifer protection area, therefore, this does not apply.
i
, ,
, i
�
�
i
�
15559.001
�
�
�
J
Q
Z
a
W
�
V)
�
�
O
0
M
3.0 OFF-�ITE /�NALYSi�
No off-site analysis is required for this project site, as the site discharges almost immediately into
the Cedar River located across East Perimeter Road. The entire downstream conveyance piping
is shown on the project site's grading plan for reference. There are no problems associated with
this projecYs downstream drainage course. Runoff discharges from the new oil/water separator
through 25 LF of 12-inch PVC to the northwest into a Type 1 catch basin.
Runoff then courses northeasterly through 107 LF of existing 12-inch storm drain to a Type 2 48-
inch manhole, then again northeasterly through 110 LF of existing 12-inch storm drain to a Type 1
catch basin on the east side of East Perimeter Road. Runoff courses from this catch basin for 20
feet (approximately) directly into the Cedar River. The Cedar River ultimately drains into Lake
Washington.
15559.001.doc
a
a
�
�
.
�c
0
�
�
W
�
�
Q
_
� :�,,
� � ��.
a , `,� , .
,
5' , ,
� �
� �
� `�
�
� � �
\ `� �
� `�
C,� ��
�
\�,p�
C�`
� .;
'�,��\
\ %r
� � .
'���\,J ' i
� � � Zi
�'y � , m'�
� � il.io Qi
�
�` \ ._., �c. �QI
. Q�����, pi�
�a���� � i�/ 1.
� / 3
� n ' �� I �
� \ � '�_:.5 I ,
� O :{53
'..C� � �,p` � !
\ � oy 1 �m
� L �r'�, 4
� t •.
� �'f� t'�'' 1
•�� � °4iq � r
\ '6,�'. � ,
' � {y' )
^ \ `G '� �
:. iE-`..i-:c� ^ G'i!.NC11 L:IDaR RIKR_____ 517.�] , �. ` �•, � �t• � '
\
2 �
–."_— ____...._ ._"–__._ \ .
s..-�e_�.E -, �:oi.as -.
�q� � 1
♦ +�,''�.. � I
,� \ .
eZ s� � �yst.
tt�\ �� �s /i
S IT E �� ����. � ��� �
_ .�
a ;
-_ ;� ; ��., �; � �
_ - ��•,:,,, � ; ���� � ,:e.,' I
H � �. �,:i ,� ' '_-
\ ` ,� .,o `�
6.20 � �
9 8�-13 E .�� Ii0).'� K \ � O+I'•B
-_� � ; � n
\h a.i
CdAMERCL4LAVE 1 i�za. .,y�o i � � ,�'..
--%t@1p6D SO Z.B.JLD CE�I�A 5{yEq � �
___.'_____________ . . I330 ,p
�"'__ `"
, � . �0 � cp � �O '_' ""__""___ __" '_'_"
t-- -
,p . � � , � '"_ "_'_ _"'_"'_ _'""'
, 19 ' 18 ' � r "'"_"' '___
� ' ' � 40 '39 � 38 I 3/ � _ "_ ___'__ '__ ' ' �r �� �
. • , � �
--�
� .
� '31 � , 32 3i 30 2g 28 27 2.; � o.o l'�:i.os; � . � '
� .
• � o� �
� � e� ,o . 1
„� ' �
. ;^ ;R `
, � � 1 ; � ' � : �
� �
� �
� � : 22
ADC} � ` , ; ;. , .
, , , , ; 1 ,' ; ,
, , ` � ` ;
� � • ; � � ; � . � �
� ; , + ; � � ' ; o*- r. � �„�o i
, � ,
,
, ;
, , � ,
. . , i
. . , , :
, , , , , :
� , , � . i �
—�------•------------- ; .
------ ----------�---- , � ; ? i i : ; ; ; ; .
--'------'-----------'------
_'____"'�_'__"_'"_""__' ' - ' i • i . � � -_ f6 �'
v11C olt1f.TZIf"""a"""s_'_'"_""_'_'"`""""'"�
� i � . �"'___'"'_""_'"�_"""_r"'__" t""__�"'"""_'"_'_'"
.
. �
. � . � . �� J�3
x •
� � . e: � '" '"' ""' L25"_""'' " "" "_"""' '. � r
� : ""
, � ..1 !o _________ ____ _____�_________ ____ __ A4', 2��Z �
/��i �t� .
� , � ,
� �' - o�� I
�, � . , t , ; . � : 1 � � . � ; .
. , , �
� t5 ' ' 1 '
16 i
�
� , ' > � p • 3 �
, , � � 1 ; : . � : : '
� � � • � . � . . � � . �
� � � �
� � : � �°� ": c�o�sr I.
_.__"" i"L4._: Q ' �o • � � . 5 • ''
� ;
'""'_'_ � . . � . , �
� . ; , �
� . ' �
e-c-�: �-�-�i """""�""'i__'""'_'_'_' 6 � sx. �
,1 i'�_�' t-i-ii"_._"_'e'�"'._a"' 9 • 10 , N 1 12 � '
' ' � ^'�
� , �
, �o ; 1
�
`"_'__'"'_'_'""'_i___""'13 � 1� � 15 : 16 . 17 � p ; O �
. f � � � _
_"_"_"_"_"'_- . �
�r------------------------—�—�-�_--------------------------------------------'a—'------------i�
----�--------------- � �oo
�-v-�: �-i-i=-''"'_=`_�p-''-.�os; . ;S 5 �01? �T
�-i-ii 1 � iw15 I
9AFG4 ORD 1]�� al _�0-9) INJR'y '
7$—�_-- .o-- � 3 A:P.P:x2TxAYl _ --+--�__ — Wn s�e. � � ', � I
—re—.—T__.__`_T_ �--
� 15 �17 � I p 4 .�o io•.._-r10 :o;
I ° 8 1 9 � 10 » `i2 ;•13 � �—__ ��_..�.� �
' �:� � . � : ' ' ' � �Jo s3$ 16 1' iD 19 Z i I
' ! ' N�1B23b5 '' 3 wiss
, o a �
� � a �
, . , �
� , . � .
..z
�'^ �
, , . ; � ..., ,
I I 1200o s � � : '. : � - - ! Oo1D '
. � • � Sl� .�G , .r i
�
�
� ±cOp 5 '
�
�
� � O�pp I � � � a ud s � � ' I ----- -
� ='� . � �° :q000 sr �ioo � _ .
__________'___'_'-.�__'_'_'__'_' - GiCO pc.g s j �
e t
,. . � _'_'_ ' _ '
.j,. . . �_"__' "�.'3O" __
� � „
�r; n.os � �5 � ----
_ , ----,�
�`� +n���^Y � — . ._. . __ .._. ' , io� i ,
�s 4
REFERENCE: King County Department ofAssessments(Jan.2013)
Scale: FOf. Job Number
Horizontal: N.T.S. VerticaJ: N/A ACE AVIATION
15559
GH'�V 1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� �►► �� KENT,WA 98032
m �� Z (425)251-6222 Title:
� s� _ � (425)251-8782 AS S E S S O R MA P
s� vI U' �5? CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,
�T'"�c_N��NE�' SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES DATE:03f06/13
P:115000s1155591exhibitlgraphics115559 amap.cdr
�
a
�
z
Q
J
a
0
O
O
J
LL.
�
�
W
�
FLOODPLAIN
Please refer to the attached document indicating that the 100-year flood plain is contained
within the river and the project site is located outside of the flood plain.
� I
_ �
�
15559.001
' { . � � . " . . .. . . - i
f , i
, tiy4R7�,� '
O/�'��'.y
����° �ederal Eme�gency 1Vlanageme�.t Ag�:ncy �
°� � 4s Washington; D.G. 2Q4'72 _ ;
�tqNn s��J €
� £ �^� � : �
� � .. . ��� � V �W� . . . �.�`_ � 3 Y ?
. . . . T"£y'� (` � `�i(?`. ..
s � ,.
CL'R t ll'�"'1}�v�ti�. ,...4 r .: 'Y�� t
RETURI�f RECEII'T REQi7ESTEII ��: V`'�``;� � [
f
The Honorable Kaihy Keolker Community: Ciry of Rentan,WA
l�iayar,City of Renton Community No._ 530088
10�5 South Grady Way
Renton,WA 98057
Dear Mayor KeoIlcer:
This respontis to a Letter of Map Revisian(LOMR)request dated June 5,2005(Case No_06-IO-B�69P),
from Mr.Ronald Straka,P.E.,Surface Water Utilities Supervisor,Public Works Departmeiit,City of �
�
Renton,that the Department of�-Iomeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency{FEMA} i
evaluate the effects that updated flood hazard data for the Cedar River from the confluence with Lake
�'Jashington to just upstream of I49th Avenve would have on the flood hazard information shown on the
effecrive F�ood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM}for your community. The FIRM panels affected by ttze
updated.data include the.folIowing: Panels 53033C066�F,53033C0977 F,53Q33C0981 F,
�3033C0982 F,53033C0983 F,and 53033C4984 F. This Ietfer is based oia the best available flood hazard
information and is intended to improue npon tliat shown on tl�e effecfive'FIRM. ` !
We reviewed the submitted data enclosed in the application package entitied"Flood Insurance Mapping �
Study of the Cedar River,Lake Washiiigton to Rentou City I.imits,"prepared for the City of Renton by �
Northwest Hydraulic Consnitants, dated Apri12006,and the undated su�porting report entitled"Technical ;
Support Data Notebook(TSDI�for Cedar River,Reuton Washington,"also prepazed by Northwest �
Hydraulic Consultants. We have determined that the submitted data meet the m�imum floodplain ;
mauagement criteria of the Na#ional Flood Insurance Program{NFII'),but FEMA cannot issue a LOMR or '
Physical Map Revision at this time. i
Until such time as FEMA can physically re�+ise the Flood Insuraace Shzdy(FIS)report and FIRM,we j
encourage your community to reasonably use the draft work map entitIed"City of Renton Work Map," `
prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants,dated April 7,2€3Qo,as the nest available data for floodpiain �
management purposes,in accordance with Paragraph 603(i�)(4}of the NFIP regulations(copy enclosed) '
ana�rloodplain�viauagement i3ulletzn�-98,enritie�"Use of t�loat lnsurance Stucty{�'IS)i�ata as Availabie i
Data"(copy enciosed). BulleTin 1-98 provides guidance to communities ou the use of FEMA draft or i
preliminary FIS data as available data for regulating floodplain development_ !
i
,
We are preparing a revised FIRM and FIS report for Kiug County,WasIungton and Incorporated Areas.
Preliminary copies of the revised countywide FIRIVI and FIS report will be distnbuted for review in �
approximately 8 manths. V�e wilI incorporate the modifications descnbed iaihe aforementioned submitted �
data into the Preliminary counfywide FIltM before it is d�striTiuted. ' �
�
This Ietter,is based on�uinimum floodplaiu managemeut criteria established under the NFIP_ Your �
community i.s iesponsible for approving aIi floodplain development and for ensuring all necessaty permits i
required by Federal or State law have been received. Sta#e,county,and communify afficials,based on ;
�
�
I
f
i -
t -
2
laiowledge of local conditians and in tize interest of safety,may set higher standards for construction in the
Special Fiood Hazard Area,the area subject to inundation by ihe base flood if the State,county,or
, ' community has adopted more restrietive or comprehensive floodptain management criteria,these criteria
take precedeuce over the minimum NFIP criteria.
If you have any questions regarding ftoodplain management regulations for yonr com�nunity or the NFIP in !i
general,please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer(CCO)for your community. Informarion on I
ihe CCO for your community may be obtained by caIling the DirectQr,F�eral Insurance and MitiDation
Division of FEMA in Botheli,Washington,at{425)487-4682. If you have any questions regarding this
letter,please call our Map Assistance Center,tolI free,at I-877-FEMA MAP(1-877-336-2627). il
Sincerely, I',
�,��,�,� E� _ , ,
Allyson Lichtenfels,Project Engineer Far. William R Blanton Jr.,CF1VI,Chief
Engineering Management Secrion Engineering Mauagement Section .
Mitigation Division Mitigation I}ivision
Enclosures I
cc: The Honorable Larry Gossett
Chair,King County Council
Mr.Ronald Straka,P,E. ,
Surface Water UtiTities Supervisor I,
Public Works I?epartment ' '
City of Renton I
Mr.Steve Bleifuhs I
Flood Hazard Reduction Services Manager I
King County
Ivr�r.Eri�P.owlan�,P.E.
Project Engineer '
Northwest Hydraulic Consultants
i �� � �
� � ;. , , `/ ,� � �
�' � L�A:vhs!nqim � � { .
i � ' � � ���� ,
�.,,� J_
���"� � _r. +
_ `��i , �, LYnlofD�IaiIMSNq' c�a'r=��EBOtIN� - .
� f� 1 � - -- � �C. � �
; �=�`)�, ���,�h:.�,,_,-� � 4 ,�;� {:
4� �\� �'c' � ' Z0.'It%��1 �\ �
;.��,� ,� ,'rv �.�' , � :, � � ��A
�:` � � . ^B 1 '1 .�. �� �: � � , ..�._ � �
. / �� !t� ' `i ,� 1 S i L' ✓�„ " �,', _
� � 1 ne x(stcae� .,�.__i iti\�;''. 1 � tA r� '�:�,.
�`� � � Q _ � ;71 r ? f�. \ 7' �fi
� ` i �
� �� � 1 w.�k�.�a,«,a��.� �i t � � " -ti�1 � LEGE�]D
. . �� ,a. �..csb.. /� �; � [ i � —
� \ �` qanielf,�M�Ye
--� f � Q �a s onr�..m�Fo.. / �' %/ '` �` l �`� `� � Floot+m 6mr�ry
(� i 1 � � s! ` Q �i� iwr.aFt�c�,ea,�i
� i 1 � ,'t � 1�
J \,' �
�. � ) 1' t. '.� ...Y sm-r����eo�arr �
> �;� .....,..�,..�.,,_.eas��tm e�a�i�
/ 'f
r - � � a /� i � / � , �� � A A G�i-S'%�II
I . . � o r I � .) ! '�', 2me% �.., � a, 'r� r� �, t' ``�i', \ — - - —�muala aou�can
i , ,� r : r t�:- �
t g t` •EIIM1'1 EE���trn Re`emce hk�M
}� ('
- , ° �1 Gp \1a p � �� -. i�� `j V� % f� r����1` y a � Scale:"=S00'
o L1C __ , t .> . n
L--- �a C'l r� . . . ._ '1 �. .r, ,,`� �l-r � l-z <00 25J D S�]i� �00' ,
� 1� 1 x�1 `���\\ •. � . � . . . —���1 �tti`�?� ��`\' �� �
� \ I 1
I V � ,., - f 1� � ) (4,\ .��<_ .
� �,, —_J'\'"�,` J1, Ii�i�iJl \�\`5p
_�—_-� ` — I ' —/ ,\•� ` �',1
I— ��1. � ,;,,_,,, �
� . � l o�' �. _ ir.l < ,; .. � l� -.
I ( -�� 1 Z . . � �
'. } �� '
2meAE r I` ' ii ��'� � ��J II �
� -- Znaex(51a0eJ1 I I �. � - '.
' � I -_ ��� 7 �� '11
i 0 ` ,J ' - ��i q � �'
� �* .' O � _ �'_, � � zo����s� _ �GJ ���,3
—- — — -—j �-; � r�;�� � a ___ ,� ,,..
, � �z � r -
r'�
d ' SouT�Boeiy g � �
I , � o � � � �_ � g r , 1
i ''`'� ' �t " � N� . 0' a9` c � � ;�f
�-, �* �, o 11 �,
l ,�
L_ , �� �� � -
F' .���.
, ���`� e o. . ,
L� .fi'.� o N � ' f ' �r•
�
�_-- ttr 4 r;+��n . P r• L `' . G o'�� � Q� ��� �4Q co ogog �3� � � '-
�e.�`P u cr o��^ � a��" � of o �
� y - � - 2one% � � u�vo o�c�'.c.�� 6p� ��i-.j go c+��yo � A.;
__ ' � � . o � q,p � � �� �'i�� .d � �}'�. .
I 3e i � � i� � � �� Y p� � � �eo � � �S . ..� . . i
n � o $ � (',
i -� t � y"''� � �a� �,o o � [�. u o . oop o9� a`� I �� ��
� ; ''�s� � {�. e . ' � ' G=� ���7 T .��:5 I�ra�rt � _:��. a � /�i
�__ dl.3 Zor�eAE 1 -- ��. ��0 0 0. Lf.� oOU�o �1 m �� V -Qm0 _:. � �•�;"�
i �/3��.� a ,.. o °c❑ o o �--Ig]� c� ouG00 00, �„p�-,r ��.
) (Z O � � �°e° � 3 � B � °o�� d"A �o e � � �i,; `.
�' I �� � � ru � � .
J � F ` }+� � e
_ '
I-- e� _ 1 �J-� � o� ` g —T�'� ��] '0 c �� n0❑ . .�.
i".� w ��_ ,p o;o nfi o �' y o �� �:> �
� O O` pu �
- _ ❑ n � �_ �.
. ��- _ _ . . � ✓ �O a a ��,6 e�� ��-�� �J�. a��� a O ❑ :�� � �'�
{ �� �Q t��[�.�l EnM-1 O � d�❑ ��lT/F��t�7 . ... � tu.�-. ..
—--—- - i � ����� L�+' �... �_J� U i� p T. 'u ao❑ o�y- 4(i on' a U I�~� - ��
i . - R q 9 o p o. O !�C ov�p .j � �, _,�� u ��� V,' _ , i
,�C� LS� daa � o❑ �I � r. � a �� �,,�Y
� ��n ❑ p =-` _ �
�� '� o-� �a d a o � a06` �7 � a �s�I � F .r
na o � .:n.,4c� C� .-Ytn-X,� r � ..
�, `�l �°9F�; o I , o L " �a« � ,- !i ; ';.,, �';� r
. '�. � . � � ��7 e�- �` s c`�r 0.Gc -- . 7 ll�+,� .
__� ._ . f� . . -? � •T, �!, �,.0 7 f'S�. ( �'• ,( {
LJ 1 �" �
� J�� .a-e1c�Sla�fe�1 t ,e��il,,, D '�x � ,�s�' . � ''i �� I
�_ �. .�y., � � � , � ,�
r �j � oo z r , . ( `s , c �
r � 3 °"';',��a.�s7 LLf,u,Il� e r -- "':- C �` } � ..I
i �� o a O '' ��- ■� J �_. \ �'
_ �_ :o � - - •
a CCC...������
'` i . � I ._. e o� oo. � .� �C�L� ;�� .orenE � \."�
!! �
_ ' � � r � -� �''f-�L� i ��l. ,. �� _� G � . '_'j j - . �e .. . . . (
Q �i 3 �
� �__ — r � - _ -_ – � ti� �� c ��x
� -- , 4 ���� ���.x�? i
, ' `�� F.il I�y _ � M' . I
Zix. �J � 1
/�� r - ' '\/ � � �. � .. . e� ����� \ � � J -I r�:�� !� �`x
i . �
�,� [� (� 1�
� � � � LinidSlWy I F: 1 f r � x`
� FC / �• o �, L1 Ll� � ' 2onE%ISAadea�•
.�rP ' ��.__� _ �:___ , �- � � .-'�,� FeA'skian8�'49e�� ..\ oreAE�
n� .fl S�� i� '_}' ._ ` { ZoneM . ,, r .. . C�� � ... \-- -__ - ��.
. � , �
�.� . f � . � ,, `_ . _. ' �� _ . Q .._"'' .
• �..-r . ; ��
, � '� l ; . r . ��� �
�.. , :� . - ' � . _
y
�'
u
_ ' �".' ' - — �.
, . . : _. .. :.._
� � � .. . � J- � . 2oru aE �'
L� _
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATIONS osTu�NFa��uTpN
Zon�aE Thefbouiiaurance•rskmnevniUicorrty�oMs
��e,00,�.,�a�o��2M����F,�a �a���lalDauunNADB391Wassigton,NmhZ�ne northwest hydraulic consultants inc. City of Renton Washington
Zcny M 1F�e 9oaC inwrance rlst mne xtich wnespoNs hY GekikC melAOM1s.BFEs ue slo�vn.ilM bs n�x. Yertical Dalun:IUVJ 68.FI
tn areaz outsik IAe SOCyer floadFbn.
Zone AH ll��e f6oa insurancx�ax mne anich wrre� 'rerlical Ual�m Conversion:To canrert hdn NSVD 88 n NGVD 23 1
.ure X,Shade� The rbatl Imurance rtst mre wtkn cm3pa�Cs IO InL lOOyEL 110007�iIR5,'N�iCh iR dGkliNlE4 Subtract 35fi Ft Irom WVD BB Elevation.
mweasoutsi0eIM1�0-y�rtlooaph�,a�eaz�� ��k,��.BFE=maY��.����.�. 16300 Christensen Road, Suite 350
1(qy9a shed IIDv 11]odlnp Miere a.2rage d�lhs lhis zo�tis hat Ilooc hqu ol t to 3 Q
ar.less INn t foal.arrs�100rn sbem usua0y rXh�reas M Don�p
tl��ciry w9e e I e ca�.i[�'irK 7rairac c Fss
h3„=,r1eJd s�°„�,�,° ,�,��-� Z���s°���r,, °e, °m=,���E��k�����,°�x°°�°s Tukwila. WA 98188 206.241 .6000 Wprk Map Anril 7 �(1(l� PIatP 1 nf
�6�:.���lere=�r.c-F:.��s�or.�,xi7t�,��'� ��I 7)�eailiwCcbrsn�ulu'.c'eni.�cr ��.
(Z^(q-12
_- _�_.
�� ;.,..,,,, ��` DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
.� +� ''"!��. SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
• ;,� �� P. O. BOX 3755
. ;' SEA7TLE, WASHINGTON 98124-3755
�� REP_Y T�
•TTENT�ON OF
Civil Projects Branch � 3 Q �I
Mr. Ron Straka,P.E.
Utility Engineering Supervisor
1055 S. Grady Way, Sth Floor FiECE1VE�
Renton, WA 98055 OCT � � 2t�!}
SUBJECT: Certification of Cedar River Levees GITY OF RENTON
UTILflY SYSTCMS
Dear Mr. Straka:
This letter is in response to a request from the City of Renton that the Corps of Engineers certify
that the right lower Cedar River Levee was designed and constructed to contain the 100-yr base
flood and that a revision of the FEMA floodplain mapping is justified. The subject levee is a
�eWgonent ef the Cedar River S�ctio»2Q5, Rentoa,WashinD on��efinec� in Lhe De±ailed
Project Report(DPR), dated June 1997. The lower portion of the project consists of a levee on
the right bank of the river and a combination levee/concrete floodwall on the left bank,adjacent
to the Renton Municipal Airport. The levee/floodwall portion of the project adjacent to the
airpart was constructed to an elevation that is approximately one-foot lower than the levee on the
right bank.The left bank structure is designed to overtop without failure, in order to limi#the rise
in water surface elevations at the right?e•.-e.,. Water that flows over this structure flows through
the airport directly to Lake Washington without returning to the river.
In addition ta the structural features, a major element of the project is the requirement for
periodic maintenance dredging as defined in the DPR and in the project Operation and
Maintenance(O&1V�Manual,dated May 2004. Other O&M requirements prior to an impending
flood, and during the flood itself, include sandbagging to specified elevations at specified sites,
raising the South Boeing Bridge, and insuring the North Boeing Bridge remains free of debris
that would reduce the flow capacity of the bridge. The O&M requirements are the responsibility
ofthe City of Renfon as defined in the Froject Cooperation t�greement(PCA), dated 9 May
1998.
The project is designed such that the combination of structural features(including the subject
levee) and O&M requirements will provide protection against the 100-year flood event at the
defined maximum bed profile.Above this maximum bed profile,the bed would need to be
dredged to restore 100-year flood event protection. This level of protection is provided with 90%
reliability,the accepted standard at the time the project was designed.
A review of the construction documentation confirms that the features were constructed as
designed.Furthermore,a risk and uncertainty analysis performed using the U.S. Army Coxps of
Engineers program HEC-FDA indicates that with the structural and O&M elements,the project
provides for containment of the 100-yeaz flood with a minimum reliability of 90%. Therefore,the
Corps of Engineers certifies the right bank levee as conta.ining the 100-yr base flood.
� Please call me at(206)764-3699 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
C �/�'
Lester E. Soule
Pro�-am Manaaer
�2—to,. �
�
•�� ' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SEATTLE DI5TRICT,CORPS�F ENGINEERS
� SEATTLE,W SH NGTON 98124-3755 1��`.r E��C.D i
REPLY TO JUI �L ZO12 { �
ATTENTIONOF Y � �J�L 3 � 2�lZ �
Geotechnical and Environmental Restaration Branch CiTY �}� RENTON II
UTILITY SYS7EMS
Mr. Ron Straka
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton,Washington 98055
Dear Mr. Straka:
This letter is to inform you that the levee certification(evaluation) letter provided to FEMA
and the City in 2004 for the Cedar River(Le$and Right Bank)Fload Control Project will be
considered invalid by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)on August 31,2013.
This change in status is a result o�revisions to Engineering Circular 1110-2-6067,USACE
PROCESS FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) LEVEE
SYSTEM EVALUATIOI`T which was finalized on August 31, 2010. This publication was
developed to guide USACE procedures for levee system evaluations in support of the NFIP as
administered by FEMA.
Prior to the revision of the Engineering Circular, USACE assisted FENiA in evaluating
levees for design and construction issues to support FEMA's efforts in the Flood Map
Modernization Program that started in 2003. As part of that program, specific definitions and
requirements were identified that allowed USACE to make levee system evaluations in support
of the NFIP. In some cases,USACE is on record with FEMA for a positive NFIP levee system
evaluation that is comprised of only a letter or a letter with incomplete dacumentation. Under
these circumstances,rhe revised Engineering Circuiar requues that USACE notify the levee
sponsor and FEMA that USACE can no longer remain on record as providing a positive NFIP
levee system evaluation. Since the evaluation of your levee system was based on data available
at the time and was completed before the publication of the Engineering Circular, the 2004
certification letter rvill expire next year.
The EC also limits USACE ability to perform levee evaluations for non-Federal sponsors due
to funding constraints. Evaluations can be performed on a cost reimbursable basis,but that
approach is generally unavailable since there are private Architect-Engineering(A-E)firms that
are capable of performing the evaluations in accordance with FEMA requirements. It is our
recommendation that you pursue an updated certification through an A-E firm if you wish to
continue to have your levee accredited in the NFIP.
�
/ �
�
-2-
Further communication between the Corps of Engineers,FEMA Region X and yourself is
planned to clarify issues relating to this development.
For additional information,please contact me at(206) 764-3776 or Dennis Fischer of my
staff at(206) 764-3555 or via email at dennis.a.fischer(�a usace.armv.mil.
Sincerely, �
/''�'1�.,�.' l
Mark A. Ohlstrom, P.E.
Chief, Engineering Division '
Seattle District,Corps of Engineers
O�e 4��F`U
j���� NATIONAL FLQOD INSURAI�ICE �R,OGRAM
� . -�.
� FEMA NATIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER
. o'iF,tQND S�GJQ-
December 4, 2006
Iv1�-. Ronald Sn-aka,P.E. IN REPLY REFER TO: �
City of Renton - ,--�_�,:;�-�.: Case No.: 06-10-B569P
Public Works Department - -��- - - -- - Community: City of Renton, WA
1055 South Grady Way � ---� : ._. Community No.: 530088
Renton, WA 98055 L L`' ry `� " -, ;
C:. , �:.-.-._.,. ,_
316-ACK
��?:_�i', ,_.��.-_. ._
Dear Mr. Straka: �,
This responds to your submittal dated No�ember 17,2006,conceining a June 5,2006,request that the I
Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)issue a revision to the
Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)for King County,Washington and Incorporated Areas. Pertinent
information about the request is listed below.
Identifier: Cedar River LOMR
FIooding Som-ce: Cedar River
FIR'�1 Panel(s}Affected: 53033C0664 F,0977 F,0981 F, 0982 F, 0983 F
and 0984 F
�,�,'e have completed an inventory of the items you submitted. Our review of the submitted data indicates we
have the minimum data required to perform a detailed technical review of your request. If additional data are
required or if delays are encountered, we will inform you widiin 60 days of the date of this letter.
�s you may know, FEMA has implemented a procedure to recover costs associated with reviewing and
processing requests for modifications to published flood information and maps. However,because your
request is based on flood hazard infonnation meant to improve upon that shown on the flood map or�vithin the
flood study and does not partially or wholly incoiporaie maiunade modifications within the Special Flood
Hazard Area, no fees will be assessed for our review.
Piease direct questions conceinin�your request to us at the address shown at the bottom of this page. For
identification pu'tposes,please include the case nuinber referenced above on all correspondence.
If you have general questions about your request, FEMA policy, or the National Flood Insurance Program,
please call the FEMA Map Assistance Center, toll free, at 1-877-FEMA MAP(1-877-336-2627). If you have
specific questions concerning your request,�lease call the Revisions Coordinator for your State, Ms.Jennifer
VJinters, �,�ho may be reaciled at(720)�14-1 i 07.
Sincerely,
Sheila M.Norlin, CFM ',
National LOMC Manager
Michael Baker Jr., Inc.
cc: Mr. Erik Rowland, P.E.
Project End neer
�Iorthwest Hydraulic Consultants
3601 ErsenirowerAvertue,Alexandrra,V!�22304-6425 rii:i-BT-F�II�iA i�SAP FX:7Q3.360.5J25
i he�viapping on Demand Team,under contract with the Federal Emergency P.9anage�nent Agency,is the ,
idationai Service Frovide�iDi iil0 �rnil0ii'o�civOu i[i5ui'aiiCB�iLlyia�
O�YI��'•[•
'� ��° Federal Emerge�cy 1Vlanagemen� Ag�ncy
x � �-
� Washin on, D.C. 20472
o� � �
�t`qND StiGJ -- '."' = ";`-= ,.��
FEB I 6 Z007 �_`4 ~ `:��;�
--� �
. .,� . - .
eEx��D�. . . -�:�= -..=:��s:��:�
: �..: - i�.rl.j
RETURN RECEIPT REQLTESTED ;�.` `-`,`,,�t>, ._
The Honorable Kathy Keolker Community: City of Renton,WA
Mayor, Ciry of Renton Community No.: 530088
1055 South Grady Way
Renton,WA 98057
Dear Mayor Keolker.
This responds to a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)request dated June 5, ZOQ6(Case No.06-10-B569P),
from Mr. Ronald Straka,P.E., Surface�Vater Utilities Supervisor,Public Works.Department,City of
Renton,that the Department of Homeland Security's Federat Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)
evaluate the effects that updated flood hazard data for the Cedar River from the confluence with Lake
Washiugton to just upstream of 149th Avenue would have on the flood hazard information shown an the
effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIR1V�for your community. The FIRM panels affected by the
. updated data include the following: Panels 53033C0664 F,53033C0977 F,53033C0981 F,
53033C0982 F, 53033C0983 F, and 53033C0984 F. This letter is based on the best available flood hazard
infoimation and is intended to improve upon that shown on the effective�'II�M.
We reviewed the submitted data enclosed in the application package entitled"Flood Insurance Mapping
Study of the Cedar River,Lake Wasl�ington to Renton City Limits,"prepared.for the City of Renton by
Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, dated Apri12006, and fhe undated supporting report entitled"Technical
Support Data Notebook(TSDN} far Cedar Itiver,Renton Washington,"a1�prepared by Northwest
Hydraulic Consultants. We have determined that the submitted data meet the minimum fioodplain
management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP),but FEMA cannot issue a LOMR or
Physical Map Revision at this time.
� +
Until such time as FEMA can physically revise the Flood Insurance Study(FIS)report and FIlZM,we
encaurage your community to reasonably use the draft work map entitled"City ofRenton Work Map,"
prepared by I�Iorthwest Hydraulic Consultants,dated Apri17,2000,as the best avaiiable da.ta for floodpiain
mana.gement puiposes,in accordance with�'aragraph b03(b)(4)of the i�1FIF regulations(copy enclosed)
and�Floodplain Management Bu�letin 1-98, entitled"Use of Flood Insurauce Study(FIS)Bata as Available
Data"(copy enclosed). Bulletin 1-98 provides guidance to communities on the use of FEMA draft or
preliminary FIS data as available data.for regulating floodpiain development.
We are preparing a revised RIRM and FIS report for King County,Washington and Incorporated Areas.
Preliminary copies of the revised countywide FIRM and FIS report will be distnbuted.for review in
apgm�imately 8 months. We wi11 incorporate the modi�caiions descnbex.i�the��orementioned suLmi��e�
data into the Preliminary countywide FIRM before it is distributed. -
This letter is based on m�nimum floodplain management criteria established under the RTFIP. Your
community is responsible for appraving alI floodplain development and for en�?ring all necessary permits
required by Federal or State law have been received State, county,and cammt�nity officiats,based on
2 �
knotir�ledge of local cor�ditions and in tlie interest of safety,may set higher standards for constntction in the
Special Flood Hazard Area,the area subject to inundation by the base flood. If the State, county,or
community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria,these criteria
take precedence over the minimum NFIP criteria. .
If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the N�IP in
general,please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer(CCO}for your community. Information on
the CCO for your community may be obtained by calling the Director,Federal Insurance and Mitigation
l�ivision of FEMA in Botheil, Washington, at(425)487-4682. If you have any questions regarding t}iis
letter,please call our Map Assistance Center, toll free,at 1-877-FEMA MAP(1-877-336-2627). �
Sincerely,
����"� E'`
Allyson Lichtenfels,Project Engineer For: William R Blanton Jr., CFM, Chief
Eng-ineering Management Section Engi.neering Management Section .
Mirigation Division Mitigation Division
EncIosures
cc: "The Honorable I.arry Gossett
Chair,King County Council
Mr.Ronald Straka,P.E.
� SurFace Water Utilities Supervisor
Public Works Department
City of Renton
Mr. Steve Bleifuhs I
Flood Hazard Reduction Services Manager '
King County - ;
Mr. E�Rowland,P.E. I,
Proje:t Engi�eer !
Northwest Hydraulic Consultants I
Ali Sadr
From: Dan Balmelli
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 12:32 PM
To: Ali Sadr
Subject: FW: Ace Aviation meeting with Renton
Pls print in colc
Dan Balmelli
Executive Vice President
(206)396-8588 cell
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
(425)251-6222 - Phone
(425)251-8782 - Fax
htt�://www.barghausen.com
---------------------------------
From: Dan Balmelli
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:08 PM
To: 'David Freeman'
Cc: File
Subject: RE: Ace Aviation meeting with Renton
Hi Dave,the meeting with the city went very well. It was attended by Vanessa, Ron and Arneta.
The main purpose of the meeting was to discuss issues related to the FEMA 100 year Floodplain and specifically the
issues listed below. I have added the responses to each question in red below based on my meeting with City staff.
1.What version of the FEMA maps is Renton going to use for review of this project,the current adapted,the proposed
draft or the King County flood study?The city confirmed they will be reviewing the project based on the 100 year flood
maps with was based on a study Renton had completed by NHC which shows that the 100 yr flood is contained within
the Cedar River.The city refers to this flood map as the D map.The city has received a letter from FEMA agreeing with
the resufts of the flood study and use of the D map as the best available information.
2.Based on the version used,what are the impacts to the project and what are the resulting project
requirements. Based on the citys confirmation that they will be reviewing the project based on the D map,the site does
not contain any flood plain and therefore will not be subject to compensatory storage requirements or the requirement
for a biological assessment.
3. How is the city addressing the existing floodwall levee relative to the flood plain?Is it considered certified? Based on
the citys determination to utilize the D map,the existing floodwall is considered to be certified.The city has received a
letter from the Corps of Engineers indicating that new levee regulations are planned to be adapted in August of 2013
which could result in the existing floodwalls being decertified. If this occurs,the city would most likely go thru the
process to recertify the flood�vall.
�
4. What specific conditions and requirements will app{y to this project since the buildings are existing and it is located on
airport property?The city is not anticipating that the Ace Aviation project will be subject to any specific conditions or
requirements.They are however recommending that the finish floor elevation of the new building be set no lower than
the existing building to remain and if possible, increase the finish floor as much as possible to be as high as possible
a��cv�� ti�e ilcodplain con�ained �viihin the e:��isting lev�e ,Vs�em.
Pl�ase review the above infom�ation and let me kno�uv i�y��u hav� an�� �ue�stions or v�rculd lik�to ciscu�s in �urther d�tail
Thanks
---------------------------------
Dan Balmelli
Executive Vice President
(206) 396-8588 cel
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
(425) 251-6222 -Phone
(425) 251-8782 - Fax
http://w�i-�v.barghausen.com
From: Dan Balmelli
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:49 PM
To: David Freeman
Subject: RE: Ace Aviation meeting with Renton
Hi David, I have a meeting confirmed with the city this coming Monday at 3pm. Let me know if you can attend, if not, I
will give you a summary after the meeting.
Thanks
---------------------------------
Dan Balmelli
Executive Vice President
(206) 396-8588 cell
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
(425)251-6222- Phone
(425)251-8782- Fax
http://www.barghausen.com
---------------------------------
z
- i
� arrsrur�� ` 2� ' f � 0� L E G E N D I
� � � � �- , ���:- ,
� � . i :. lI � � � SPECIAL FLOOD HAZ�IRD AREiS INUVD;\TtD '.
i ' ^ �''� B}' 10o-YE4R FLOOD
� t,
,�
� � . t:� -�v� ZONE A V��I,.'�c tbkul�dctiaiv�n. It rmmtrl .
� �
��.'. ���� ��� �t ZONE AE Rn�i ����d ra•�xn„ns�Iri�� n�Yl.
� r'"� CTHER FCOOD AREAS
� �. � L_� zotve x a�`as a suo-�r��no�d:a � x .
Z diu�d wn4 a�rraRc ��xh ( kss i. ..
� ���_ �,� I f«,t o wrth d*ainege Ie�s an
�, �: ��V �� , i I .y.i a r er m i l c: anA ar e- prot c r t ed�hY
� , �� .� � s i.�m tOf�ycar flnid.
ggg � OTHER �.REAS
- g � , ..� ZONE X as deicrm�ned to Se ewside 5[�y¢�ar
�� P :�dpla n.
ZONE X � � ZO�IE X ..� �
,�"� �.:,
� S, S � k O
`f ` �-.
� ���'�����
� �
Z ' � � r
,
�VJ 5TH c, � ,,-.-�'", ! � i � �
�TREET 1 �,- 1 f� �OI�E
� � � L �
E � ii [ } "F<�d1 G7 f ' �
� �f �,,_,.., `� ,J Q
VW 4TH •—� ��� � _,.,r-�� � ���, L
'LACE I� 1 �..��'""'��� �lut;: ��pC�f i. �,(
� � r � i
i ��`� y" � i �Z
� � � �I �i {,: ; 2'
�,
�,�_ � , '� ',,; ' ' r�-� r" ZONE X � r
� ! s �t �'� �'�� �
G' �"� t : ..-�'�'� , , N 0
i �
�' ��
N W 4 i H � ��� � ��1 �'�� � r
STREET '�� j{N;,.,r.r�t~'.'�`�" , � ' }� �
_ . 4 �•�" � �
;} � ! - -� ` : � Z
4 ��_ �_: _ ��t, , � ° i ��- �
� •S ' ��S .� a�
� t Y�
�� � � � 4 Z
y �,.� i �c
NW 3RC� P�q�E �� ^ ' � �
�— f� i ����:�� ��," O
u �' �' i � i � � �
� ��� `4' �: { \ � i
� ��� c� ir ; S', �i �
S V � S
O G�u � I� �� • ' � ,.i. ;,!
z S �''L . I /y f '\
Q ��' ' �
� � A� y � � `�� t��, 1
� � � ZQ1V� A � ���.� �
Z � ���� � � 1
W � K
� � SITE � `4� � K
� RM278 ?� ;�, ,
SOUTH AI�?POR7 , �
' "_' 1NAY �`>- �fj�
s S ~�. >�
Q .,,� T 1 '`��` =
� P � SOUTH tILLICUM STREET � � �`' <"`
N o i ��
P�N�� y�� � = � ��`a
J' ��' p �
�n
� CG�,y SOUTH TOSiN STREET ',
` �G� 'O� l� S T081tJ ST.
� 1 �� �� � ,. T �I
REFERENCE: Federal Emergency ManagementAgency(Portions of Map 53033C0977 F, May 1995)
scale: FOr" Job Number
Norizontal: N.7.S. Uertical: WA AC E AV I AT I O N
¢GHAvs 15559
1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
+� �►� � KENT,WA 98032
m � �2 Z (425)251-6222 Title:
� s � (425)251-8782 F E MA MAP
� 2
y �i U' CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,
�CT ��y,
�"'�EN���� SURVEYING,EM/IRONMENTAi SERVICES - DATE:O3IOF)I'I3
P:V 50DOs1155591exhibitlgraphics115559 fema.cdr
�/') '�
�
�
LL
�
a
W
�
Q
W
�
H
N
Z
W
�
� % - t� , - ---�--- - �
� ' n r ', �;;s �i . � , .
. h .
� -�'� �• ' � � -.�� _" `��
� � � 4 V'> K'^�.ss # �
a
�,� ,# �� ..
_
_ . ��
. n�,F ��`' ; � " � ��� _ ��i.,
�� ��.� .� `�, t�1 `. ��' _ # ' � - �°
t� � ,j�,: 'F. A . - ����.-.
y
�( 5 � : L
i _
� �- � ^4._ .� � _ . . . f _ — I
t E i # � �� ,
,1 '- �;I--I =� �
r' �_.,.�«-, - T �[ �� . .. �� f_ - . '� '
-�':e�,'"'.. �t--
F� . �' . � � ` � � 1� - , } ,gi � � '
,�J a i�� ' � � � �`' �n`�!� �
}� . � �� � f�: ' ' j �,} � `� �'�,� =�- .. .�....'�t 6� . ,yr t :!t .
►.;. ,�e.'y ;.?�_v� � �i *. h9 at►!�r' F �
�j � "w� � �i� R4��q���i� � � ' �
) r �~� i ����rrr :�'�
�' �Y i'"1'1 i j+�M+�y �
, �. �. � t� ,�-��F 1F�t5�liii�lA `' � :r � .
� a ,�, .� ���S �f-M�f Jr��. � ' - . ,
f rt! �` 1
,'s - , , �� r,� t �. ._� ��
� ��{ r t!i , - °; 'k ���.�- �•�
�. � '� ,� .'"� ,� �� � ���[�
� �Y r , ;..- �,,, _ �.t� ' �,�',•�ll
;} � �- � � , �'� >'� L '� �.i� � � -�-� � r= "` � .�i
I�•�'" ,� • erti �t '� �lt �' _ :��c
'�,y` � ��� �'�, � Y ,� �
.�.. t��� _�� �,
�r�t�E s� �_` ��� � ��' � :� ;r � ;
� 1¢ ..��'TT� 1 . � r�s {+' . � ���_...1
2 ... - . � , p -�� ' � _�� �
- � . �' T� � �j 'i � .1�����`�
. -, � E. ,§ - '�� � '�� - '��L� - .�' t �!{
.. .'d � �{Y� �� 'g�`J �f � xa� p� 1l.li��
. ; �:?:� _� � � ��'.�.. � �'�.�
#� � ''•� �. '�
.j aj � �,,� `f �l ;��
, ��� -,F �'�� f ` �� -`'' � �¢ ,
' -�<< -, ��1 .t. �- ��. ��� �`*.�¢�
� ��� 4: � _�� SITE—�:- � � ,- ..: � ��'Y� ��` �'��� .
- —�-- - �"�-�_._ `���� � ��� -r�� �i�
,� -a j. r _..�. ,.. l- � �t_' � '�
��. ���'�' - � - - � �'t �` - � �, �� � ,�a
_4, �
`�'��'` _ ,( ���;*� �t �,`i.� �� i � �
�
: . ,_
. ,.
w a, .
.
`_ . _ Y. �:T_ _ ' �. . �/J � � ti.: d�'.:.f i�+ �±�:
.... -., .. �r.—c �
r . � �. _ . ��� 9�,� I d� � f� �
. ��• rr- --- a��l�V _
�
�"�-._ �=-.� v �,ai� . _ . � �-_ .1 . � r -, ��� ��. �?�•� l
� LLt•�,}., �� �—`� — -� . '1� .. . .. - ` � �� � �.
. ��. +� ��� __ .. � �s
� � b �� + 'r.� ��
� � k q J �Y f _ �- «�
I� .;T�_r.}���- t�
� '
, ,
.� a---.. w�.._ .
� � �- - — � � ., �' � �� � � •
, ._ . _ . _4
��, a �.-`-- .
_ _ �';�"��°�'-� �� ��: ��;���`� � �"` �'� "` �
.I �i� . �:��. � ;�� � � " � `� �
. . : �:- , ::
� — r _� �� .-. ��r�i�� � � �:' �� �€� ��� 4` :a_-_ �. �' `:: .
� �
Le�end
i t Gount}t E�aundary �1 . UndaeF;ed SAt?€rasian
x lda�untairt Peaks Parcels � Lakes a�targe Rivers
Highways SAO Stream �,` Streams
�j lncarporated Area 11 ��t � 5A0'Ifl�etland
��
Streets �j C�2Pam�nal � SAO Landslide
Nigi�ivay � Ct�2S�wnd � SAfl Coal Mine
�� f`f ��� � 5A0 5eismic
(cantE {contj
REFERENCE: King County iMAP(2013)
Scale: FO/': Job Number
Horizontaf: N.T.S. Verfical: N/A ACE AVIATION
��HA VS 15559
1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
Q� nI� .F KENT,WA 98032
N y Z (425)251-6222 Tltle:
� s � (425)251-8782 SENSITIVE AREAS
� �,�', y` CIVIL ENGINEERING,IAND PLANNING,
`CrJ�G ENG�r��� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES MAP DATE:03/06/13
P:115000s1155591exhibitlgraphics'�15559 sens.cdr
a
a
�
0
a
O
�
. ■ ._ . _t _,g�, ,_-. ..— --- -- < s �:
� � � � • � � __��� �t�'^9Y� "��� _�.:' +r ��y 1 f�-
-- .t. �� ���,�� ► . -...�` ..� �i�.«.'`st J�,. ������r,_ < �i -♦. - .
Z` ' .�
r � ? .t � :?�
c
+�� > �.
-- �
:r�
1 �� ��(.; • _� � -
� _. '. ■`-.� { t 1 ' � � _- - . ' � '. . , t , �'� I
�F � � t ` �•� � �i , �
y,;.1� '� 1 .f��1 �'� _ . iu:":.�.. �-.. ��� _ �v r �
p} '.�"�L'. i � � c
r�" �
f
� ' � "�� � �y� ."' :�y'i ■i i �f4�en�#a�itl�� ,� +
' � �� �;t '., �� �� ► ��i��:����+�t�`�� �
.•� � � 4 , �'- � ?��.
' �,.'�.��� � ,+:' '���� � . �t�_��i�- �r� �
' _ �" �� �� 'y 1- ��"' � .
` � i �1�� "� •-� ��,� ���fi
�f }� ��, 1 � : ��•
j �� � . ��� � -�` � � � ,k- �, '.��`. :� �� ��k
F•.:� f- '* � - ' �1. } •:+s � �' �.� f �.r. � �,
�,��j r�,• i '� •�, �i'� �, ,,l`' F �� rs�
���1 A Tl�i ;� '� "- � �:: � �,:
� � � 1 '�� . 4'1
r;, V � _� � i. �
�� - . i s k'•�� t '� i •i. � T
' �� .�.ry �;"i.1 � � F �-- -.� � � I
7fj�-, . p� � __ �� _ F "_ .
� �� .•t� �7. �s_. . . � "' . � -K� ..��. S-�- � �,•..� 1:
�� R .
�..�i/�. .-�'k
-,3`r • � � 4� �. . r �Y.��~ .�'� � a '������ � �'�: � .
_ . ` ��� � ». .i �� � : ],� �� Y_��� i ��.I
� t_ �;� � � ,� ■1 �
€,� '-! ��� '� �`� ��.. �� =.y � II
A � '#_
-� , '-� '�I ►a� i � ��
- � �r - ��,� 7R# + � '�' . �'�`1 � � _�..., - 1,- ���;:.�, i
H . ` , . :
� j rF '� 1 � � 1 , t � ��s� ��i► �
�!`'� - �" #'� ;��� �' `���,' '��`.' L''�,r ��
t SITE �'�` ` ��'' -,{, - �� , �:-- �:� --
�� ,� . �,� , ,r:
.� .. �.�.� � �!� _'i��, '� ``` - ' , �',
���---�-�'+—�= - 1 i �` ���_rs �*t��. `' ';� .�, �!'
��, � � � f '�' ti �- ���. ��, �
_ ��- �.��; � �� ,-,�. � � . � , , -
. -
,
�-
. ,.
. t� ,�4 ��y • -,. ' ii �,�; ► �
, -
- - _ . , : a ..
_ _ � _ = .,�:9 � t�, , �, �_,
y-�--- --� � ,., _ . Ji ( '� �r�pv - r :�`1 �. �'•�
-a� -�� —�+�,� ,-•��s._ _ � .. . , :. �
., , i - � . — �< . -'_'. .�:�
_ _ _ }k�
�� � - - t � r� ! ,,� .
� � ~ 4 ' �
'
� ,,.�
� � 1
�'•"]T �'<+�--�— �-1' ' t� '- �`.
� �� g.
_ 1 4
�':rj�s_� '�',) :.. 3 � , s-�:,.�_`-' -- _ y �Y` � `��
,S _
�_i �i�.��_..;.�G :'f►�ill t�i � 3.. �� — � � �� .� �,. �� .��q
� � ;4,�,Y'k . L;'� ��� � .�i � � ^�� � - � � _r � ��
=1 r��i'ir1`; -��?,� .� � � c
� �� � '" '�� - ��� � �,
� - ��� � �----�� ���:, � �:
� .1+' �- ' ��
� E .� � � . .`I � ..4 �� _ _
�+.`� G � �. �� - ��� ,� �� "�..-
. .
.�: �.�-�c -- r .y,;,> ' �� N 1 =:.r
�;�= - _ t �
sk_� S l"d5l`r ST `' ''�- - - !
�'_ -�—"�'L�-�. ���'�"+�;�.�3••`�.;� _ .. ' �;,s� . " n
�:*�` �''�� ,� :� �� .�'� `� ul T�3tV ST�
, ,.
_ . ,
' 1 -.� , , �� '� 1� _ _:� +��x�
�. . u �'
,r _ . + ��r� � — �j _`
�t � ��` � y`.� �I� � {� �.� �
, , . r
--, - �, _ � �
_.
L „ � s � ,� - ; - : m 1 a I
: ;. . �
,�.
4.-�
. _ � �: �
- _ . ,_, �
V� :, !�• �- : .. � ��� :�: ��� � �' �`��
_ �
�__� . . � i d° �_ ��� ��' �� � � , �, � '
REFERENCE: King County iMAP(2013) �
Scale: F�r: Job Number ',
Honzontal: N.T.S. VerScal: N/A ACE AVIATION I
¢GHa Vs 15559
1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� �►I� F KENT,WA 98032 li
m � �� Z (425)251-6222 Title:
� ` : � (425)251-8782 TOPOGRAPHIC �i
i
e� ,U g' CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING, MAP
�r'ti�EN�,KE�� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES DATE:03l06113
P:1150GOsi95559iexhibit'�oraphics195559 topo.cor
i
;
�
1
`i
- -� �
- )
j
1 '�
_ °�
_ l
:--�
�
� 7
.. �
; .,
4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY !
FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
A. Existing Site Hydrology
Under existing conditions, runoff from pollution generating impervious surfaces drains to an
existing oil/water separator. The existing total project site has only 820 square feet of
landscaping, most of which will be replaced and additional landscaping will be added with the
redevelopment. Most of the site consists of impervious surface under existing conditions.
Please refer to Section 1.0 of this report for a complete description of the land coverage
being modified on the project site. The remaining areas are all impervious surface.
B. Developed Site Hydrology
Under developed conditions, there will be 2,064 square feet of new landscaping, with
4,340 square feet of new sidewalk. A new approximately 20,748 square foot building will be
constructed and wash water runoff from inside the building will be directed to an exterior
oil/water separator draining to the existing sanitary sewer system off site. Runoff from
outside the building will be collected and routed to a new oil/water separator prior to
discharge to the downstream conveyance system.
C. Performance Standards
The area-specific flow control standards determined from the City of Renton Flow Control
Applications Map is the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard matching the existing conditions.
Flow control is not required since the proposed project is discharging less runoff under
proposed conditions than under existing conditions. The applicable conveyance system
capacity standards are not applicable as the entire site is being conveyed adequately under
existing conditions and the proposed project will have less impervious surface draining to the
existing conveyance system. The applicable land use-specific water quality requirements are
to provide oil control for water quality.
D. Flow Control Systems
As mentioned previ�usly, flow control is not a requirement for this project site.
E. Water Quality Systems
As mentioned previously, oil control will be the method of providing water quality so that a
coalescing plate oiUwater separator will treat runoff from outside the buildings pollution
generating impervious surface. In addition, an oil/water separator will be provided to treat
runoff from the wash down area inside the buildinq prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer.
15559.001
i
BASIN MAP FOR EXTERIOR OIL/WATER
SEPARATOR SIZING
� ; '�� � � PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
� a I� � � � � �cy,`� �fl
N �°�' _�$�; �' �����, � ACE AVIATION ��1� ��
. �.
� o ,s ao eo �'�'� =-�,��� NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC1lON 18, TWP. 23 N., RGE.5 E., W1ul. �(,r��j���!
ss.a�,-a-.
� F_,..<z';2.�`�i � ' ':,,. \\\�� CRY OF RENTON,KING CAUNlTY, WASI-YdNGTON �D� �0
:z O�� ` �� .
� �D, �_,�.��;�.•� '�`�. .� �\,
., � � R���, P� �
� � � � � � a l�\\\ �s�cN
�� g ,�� �''� ��. ���
Z�a$ �� �' � �°";- ° +'.� �����.
., o�� z� -:ooa j' <+' � �;� �,..��,
��j 3 ¢`a Z�*�� � �� y � r`` ` / '�\'��''} ce-�
(7 � /,Dr,,,� 2� i � ` ��� ��`.
a�Z Q ¢ .�-__.- ..: --- ->s--�— 4'� � r.,`. 2b.4 ��\\'�'y�
e' uJ Q �o'W :�E' � �—�0— „. __ -_'> . 's ���,�'"P
� Q d� � � ,��j'�2'� / ��� �� \i� �� \ �b` �,\\�
o + �
� �� W ��J `��\ �/ \�,\ � ` \\\\`'
N a vi 'tx,t�„�.�' /� �` „`�c�^ ����
' �i / V..T�� � `\� t�. 31.5�. \��a\�
sryc .
�L�WG / d� '��� ��' \\
1 / � 7 �
� � ��/�r ' � �� �.:Si. �9A "\��
��,� �m ? o� �" '��` �.��� -.� `^� \\ EJC DD(.Y/SSENBLY
� . � : , \ '�� � ��� TO REMAIN
o�� ;Y
„ , / o��� ,"�'On��li, .., , % . .�t 4� \��` C,�O
j'S��� �,� .:�� ' .,_ � � ". :•„\�•�
� • a.y^;� �<:Y� 1"�-��'�-, ;�'� \ ��'� 9'9
y o ' .�, h � �' \ '� `- ��'� 9
c, �F-� �c CB-N 1YPE t . � '.0 -�.�: `NEW ASPFMLT PAVDIENT� ��'Z � � �\� �
O n ruu-a�.z� / q�N�cpf ./ �,�� \ i .��l �€ '"..\ �\\\� rc�wr
- O 3 E�78.97(tY SQ r �J/� � -,6�' ..,� ..., �S�IECUT \�'`r' , `,�" 'a. \ �
Y 1;
�E � E=2&77(1Y 1� NEL VM1LT c ' FPS?� � � \ �
z ��
�w a (a;�+A-�� � ns rxe a �D ��F{{vr,u_r ` �� �,... �� � _ar. �a\ �\
P 'lkC�"S.�j' G!$BLIhYI�I.i��/\ iy � .Ta ` �� ��X\��l �3�\
�� �" \ 'J�/' `4 �
� F�El JD�/-E 1 W n `x� F.�cB(/j / � \\�t'
V �� ��, wi5 vuLL7 OUi 3 �'32���+, �4�ME(iRS� .n �`� \\���
O \ '�B FlRE \ a ' � ,�
� � .r. saaN� O � '�� J'� \\ � \�Q
�
` -� �i .� - � -� p �°„ \�9� �� � � �
"' a .I i ', 1' �` `� .,� \�„ � . ° ,��\\=•-F.,���i _,
, � '• ,\ �� ,.� \il��i n_�
$ - '37.b6���:,�: � �.` r � � � 'r.n? _
_ . � 9O s'� \\\\\\ ,
3.. �. I , �. � s� .. \\ �B�� .,\ ��.94�.;.;`\ `'�, .� ce-E
-s .���� I I�yMl f� � � � ! v �� ���' a��tr+ r+d�zs.n
g� o QI � �, i E f �\ F,���r,y� a� ;� �_� \ ¢-ze x2(s•s[1 -
��� � i� �.,, i�: I�� �'f J ,.'� " . � .�,� 'r�.' ,1 � -�\\�
� � �;, 1 ;•�!, \. /;' .a�eo' ��\\ 1, • \ � �z�ie
E ll....xx������'__���� """�,,����yy� � { }•8 ���.` 3�26 ���. Op.,� � � .� �y E�24./J(1Y!1M) .
;� 7 �'C ���/�l '�/ ' r. ` .�� \ � �r'�\ `\. ` \\•�E=13.1!(T{'SQ _
� \ • '�'��;„� , _ / / � ;�' ���� � `;�s ��� �
� ���� � � a� i � ��s . �; :�_t . `� :'�
�� � _�� - ��-� „�,�� � ` \\ ' `� � �.� \\\� �
{�R�.%8 Y � �` \ � �•
E=28.34 f9�5� \ a( k � , � \ ` �� \
� .� WF,ly\ E-28.15(12'IMJ � �� i j i 1 37 �1� � � �\ � � .'•\ \\\\ \ �
� � � �� CY � � i I����. ' �,fy a \ .., \\ � ��\�
�' E I• � ' . 3 '8 �� ;\\ \� � coHca�=
`�v �� I� �.;1�' „ PO � "� ��. ��. � �+ `.� au \\ � W/d1 ON _
\• BPoDGE
MPRO%��l1AT 54WCUT ;I � Y T �'.�.._ $c �` . \\\\\\:}• ! . �
I - , Li15E LWE(ttF�G1) L1NE � ,k— - N _ `� , ��
I (4)IW7FA . SfE NQfE 62 '___ � _'_'_�:�' � FC $. ��-C• �� � . fND 3''_IMFACE�/.SS -�.
i �
9 vuvEs ���r s� �,p��o a�iERut D \ / \ � � \ � \ \, '6 � �� �' ��� asc w/�aa+srawm E
S �* �
� 3 I� � �� �� �-K ttrf i � �y �I �'�� '\�� � � \� � �rut.cEu.sur�v.R-ss�/+en• _
� � r� ��_ �t�s � ` � � \ , �c \, � '�\� ,• (tm'o�Ra�ra+:o zixo)
vur.�wrw� - e-x�t(e's� w'
� ���, I � �� \ ��, � \ � � s�.,
a Ce-4 rr�i w� i i �� � � j �� �� ,c'.� � � 1.'" ���.
rt�WNo.ss '°i i �_ \ �� � r � ialr•
< E.29.60(8'IM� /1X�' �� i � / .,p. \ .�. i � `�� y
� � � � i � � •�\ 1���� ��a'_'
I W FND 4x1 CONC MCN� i �usnHc '� \ •.•� �� _
'�. 3ULLDIN� \ . , . . .
1- �'
. '- MiN 3/ BRI� � . _
�( F
t � p D6C W/PNCH ��� � PQNQi POIE $If,N -/ I` �y�� y• �•� � •. �;�'. .
J N/CUY MIRE /� C 3 � \'� - ` . � .•n .r�F -
I / I / �
/ �4s
�
m � lEL RSER i ppi � � C� �\ � J-.�...�ny ��r- I
�� \"�, CONCf�TE
�i c '\ `` ���.'�. WN.L ON
I �1 •\� 3,p� \ ' \ �' �-�C 6. �^ BRIDGE
J-90% \ '�� � o .,,/,r.. �� / c
\ ➢� 't 1
' � ••. � ,.�' , �
�
I�', Pr� _
� I �� \�t 1 .� \ C �`.r I SiREEf
O "VN-A r\ ' � � UG/1T �
� �
� �A �
; � �� .��? � ��' !� _..� :'�,.1 1 ��: . CITY OF RENTON �
�.�
PROFLIGHT AYIATION, INC. �EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
' z+3 w. �ai��Ko�o G H A(/
K.8q� F$NTON,Wp 9&155 � � � PRQ.��/��'(�1���D
I q�C1�DFORC��ntacE �```y�eas (azs)zza-ss�o mP �►', �Z STORMDRANAC�PLAN �
� � TO CRY STMIDAFID3 OP!`,` �,ni � CONUCT: BERNIE pt DNNE PAHOLKf
I . 3! BVtQW15QJ CONSUL7ING ENqNEFRS o�� !-_.� � oE'ialm AS ACE AVI1UlON O
' 18215 72ND AYEWUE SDUiH u
� Date ' i . � = oare o3/os/+s ��+o. "�
' 3Y f � 25672 Eo '..� KEHf.WA 98032 'j'� � y' OMnN �1"
� Date �f��S7EP G�Q�`' (4?5)251-6222 �TiN 0�� asac:n DKB scaF 1'=3C' Fsoeoac rac�_ W
1 Z � �M�AL EN (425)251-8782 FAX C ENG�N �r] U
u . Date WNfACT:DAN BALAIEW �`°�°� S�r w °F- 5 m
P•\15QOOs\15559\nreliminarv\15559-nam.dwa. 3/7/2013 1:48:50 PM, \\MERCURY10ce TD5700 - main CAD
�
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SIZING FOR TREATING
STORMWATER RUNOFF
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series
------------------------
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea-Tac
Computing Series : 155590WSdev.tsf '
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating 15-minute Time Series File
Time of Concentration (13 .518) exceeds maximum (10 . ) for EI
Loading Time Series File:C: \KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI15R.rnf .
Flow Path: Length 380 . 00 ft @ Slope 0. 0050a0
Impervious 0.73 acres
--------------
Total Area : 0.73 acres
Peak Discharge: 0 . 861 CFS at 6:30 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series File:155590WSdev.tsf .
Time Series Computed
KCRTS Command
Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module
-------------------------------
Analysis Tools Command
Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies
----------------------------------
Loading Stage/Discharge curve:15559owsdev.tsf .
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File: 15559owsdev. tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:155590WSdev.pks .
Analysis Tools Command
----------------------
_ RETURN to Previous Menu
-----------------------
KCRTS Command
eXit KCRTS Program
�
Flow Frequency Analysis
'I'ime Series File:15559owsdev. tsf
Froject Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flocv Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period /�o ��
0 .348 6 8/27/01 18:00 0. 861 1 100 . 00 0 . 990 �---�
G .243 8 9/17/02 17:45 0. 658 2 25 .00 0 .960 -�(p� QGi,�
G . 658 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.472 3 10.00 0 .900
� .280 7 8/23/04 14:30 0. 388 4 5 . 00 0. 800
� . 368 5 10/28/04 16:00 0. 368 5 3 . 00 0. 667
0 . 388 4 10/27/05 10:45 0. 348 6 2 .00 0 .500
0 .472 3 10/25/06 22 :45 0.280 7 1 .30 0 .231 � �
0 . 861 1 1/09;08 6: 30 0 .243 8 1 .10 0 .091 ��
Co_nputed Peaks 0 .793 50 . 00 0 . 980
_ �� ��.� 7.�5' �I � �°�� �,,�K� _ �og �PM
w�. �- �
�
�� �{� - !�o g�� �,.���� = ��� �PM
�
` '�.`� t�i'''�5 '`''��1 ` �-, �`� !�,
�%(�- Jl�b "�PS L�hIeS�-�� �
�;� of ��'� � ,� ��� � M��J�►�M
�-.�t�,r�l"� �8�! � �
��
,o�ss ���w r�� a-f �ya y�� -
OIL/WATER SEPAR�►TOR SIZIIVG FC�� �'REA ' ' '
WASH WATER FROM INSIDE BUILDIN�
_
;
SIZE TFIE 01NS�REA�ING WASHWATER �ROM INSID� THE BUILDING
Assume 3/4-inch diameter hose flowing 10 fps ,
Flow rate =[(0.75-inch/2)2(I�/(144)] 10 fps =0.0307 cfs �I
_ (0.0307cfs)(7.48 g/cf)(60-second/minute) = 14 gpm
Assume 2 hoses operating at one time
(2)(14) =28 9Pm
Select OWS to have 20-minutes minimum residence time
Utility Vault 577-SA has 800-gallon capacity, therefore, 285 minute residence time, So OK
15559.001
i
�
i
$ I
��-��
5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND ��
DESIGN
5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
As mentioned previously, conveyance is not an issue for this project site, as there is already an
existing conveyance system that will be utilized under proposed conditions on the site with less
runoff draining to it. However, conveyance calculations were performed on the new conveyance
pipes that are being added and the calculations and basin map are on the following pages of this
report, The modified rational method per the 2009 KCSWDM was the model used with an initial
time of concentration of 6.3 minutes, a Manning's `n' value of 0.014 and a 25-year precipitation of
3.4 inches, All pipes conveyed the flow contributing to them.
15559.001.doc
PIPE CONVEYANCE BASIN MAP �
i
' GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
� �
� a
~ � � i � � �;� r-oR G pn1�E'���1 t�
N \``�� }-�— ��� ��' �;��., ACE AVIATION P�l���n� ,,,,.,a-P
, ��
a �-., o ,s ao eo �uH-B �'�� � ��,�.� 1�1/4 OF TI-�NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18,?WP. 23 N, RGE. 5 E,WM
a I_�;6.42�124?SA� �' � `„_ . \���� CRY OF RENTON, K1NG COUNTY, WASITYVGTON
`\\ -./ +,�Y/O f ie��a2�;z4's���\ \ ��\\
��� 1 �� � \\\,� `��is�
Z Q� � \ I ik�'�m �y \ � � I \\\�
�,
/ U°RC "s \ ���' S3T18'36'E
� ���j 0 a � � d�•ry `/� \��4. 52.33
F�Q zd' C� ,�aOO r �� / ��, J ,�S'� \ �v.ae
S 3 o z � ��� `� �• �� '� � � �-��s•sn
Z i � � . �: h. � �-m.�e e•�
a� a c � ss�— � ��, �=26.58(NE7Y 8"SW)
m � Q� r�EID LOCATE IX. 12' '2" _y— 'y - - \�\�.p
� W� � sro�u awo insrsu.: `keo"�'zo,,�, � �� � �f� � �` ���;�� z3�r a'w+c �%
'� Q�� ��� w/a�Tu�ioc�n�o �0"t'{j��- �� `� >30• ��, � so e w�ee�c-�.0
g �� � RIA1 = . \\J �N s ' /�y. . � \ � ��.�';
GEN71PE1
N (6l4TCH Df.GRADE) �r�rf� ��� � � ,� �.\\�; W180LD LOCYJq LD
/ � ,c�_ '� PoH = 31.60 y�
(FIELD VEPofY'PPoOR � `-x�7� I/� r � ,� ��`' T�� � ��\ �_�Tr�8 SE� J/�0.�
ro wsra_unori) a,��p�/ c� �;�a��`` ''` . . � `�y �C\ tE - P6�71 �8.�') 1rb
aowRo / �'y°+c�' . ' 's�s `p \�\ � C � ji6,�p
2s LF tY �yp�-) l�, `� ���i � �, �� � ` . t\ �i" �
SD O OS07C �° y� �� 1.8. \ �" •\\ 1 LF 8�D.L
rEw aUwA�s�naa� ti� �, `..s"`k"�P'�ooFa�+ � A `' \\� o�:�e.�O.4-�i�
" tJTA.11Y VAULT CO. �` o� � �` �� 3tr;�eaw�r�on r��,7 ��� 1\ z� ���� s'17'E
A10D�NO.5108-CPS _ N � - 3
aw=a�s(uaai oc cRrn� � rA��� � a�� �`'� 3 \ � �2 ce�27�P�t�
y o / . � `'� � ,� ,,,� \•\ IE = 26.94(8'SW)
� �i � • � ' .. ' .� '� � 3� IE = 26.94(8'NY� .
� � �F� Y IX.C8-N 1YPE 0 � I NEW ASPHALT PAYEY , rYr �.
�p � � . �� � \` \\�� ����
� 3 E-mn�(1Y 1� A N01�36�18�E 43.05� /� � ,u� N �••3 • � � �• .. \ �. � ��,ti-\ � �• \�.HiDaAhi 6IYATm CUT =600 C.Y.
� � �Q p RWait17 / CLFN:C S�WCUf ?9.9�. \ ��, \
� � � AREA TO BE DISNRBED=32,SU0 S.F.
�z � A0.1USf PoY EL=31 Fl;Ei- v . '`' �_..
n ° / Q �/ 28 c o� \ uirts a ;c���:n:.��.:.i� ESiIw7Eo ve.� �60o c.v.
[-y W a IE=2897(NEY/�7 E� G.s cr.cE e��o 1 v,w._r � ��c/,�_ \` -.-;,ec ' ` ��` \` cc•r'T.vNa7 wrrwv The ex. _.iii
\ :A BLJrroui 58 Li lY WC vf/ -�,�. �� � ,�. \
�C1,' rn � vu�uc �� sD o o.sos ..,. iC (�� ,`� � y �`
V � ca �� ��..�-��Itl rr = ••3�4/,V ` ;.��,� ^\ ����
; ,,A- s , a ' .R � ca�o�nrE, , G � u � �.
� w/eo�n in .,�'80 ` '� "a� -�,q,� � �� \
� �c ai.�o ��(,, �.�rsoo� ��;��\ \\'��
A = J�
` � �� c � a i - � .l- '.� � . fE �8.76(12' ) FJ� ,,,///___ � �
� a y �r.�- S ,�: ,��� IE = 28.�i (1 Wj V `, � \�� ��4 c ..,\ \ aH 23472
! l �.� ���� � \\��,E=17,57�21'�El
� _ � 3 i, •,.� •� \ i" \�'iC�17 E'(ZC''£MJ
�•• LJ Lf �� yT.gp '�8�'8 •,�QO'� � ���� S29'16'00'E
a �� � �na � I I� I t. / +.�. � \ �L� ��`O •.,9 ` \\�� 53.58 �i 29.n
{ .� o . c^� `I I �'� �,�: '�4� ./�`. \ � /C `�`_'�T^��/t/ �'O `�\k .��\� E-�2(6'Sb
�� �/w �SD O 0.50.5 "�' . � •� �� F�3 /'`/��.�� ,\� ,\ �
� ,,,"' r� � f ,� � JD �• ` \ r+wz9.�e
wE.--� ^ � � 4 3f 2� � 31.80 � _ ���� VO,• 1i \\\� \\y��.+EW3.B(2�'�
'��O yW � F4'XUiI �1� . � \ \ �1 •jF` \\ � S!GN
� y�� Z l Q w3H� • . .,': �,��� ♦ �\ q �• \� �
^1 ��g ,��+ DL CB IYPE 1 jj �' � �\� \� �M C '�'`\ \+o /i`\�� \
� I —.� \ ,�y� (B'� �\ . p,�` � ��\\\ ,\ \ ` `' \ �„��_� �
p��.�� � � �. 1G4I�5�-�
'' ,N__L, IEs 5(1Y tMQ � I ��� r o �. � �� ,\ 4 ,.� ��,.r\\�
� � � �'� y � � � �• '�\�\ �S��'��'�7� _ccw.x�e
� i " aru.c�
� UMIT OF GRWO - C! V 7 � - ��\�\�� ./ 6R�
I MD QJERUY , _ �44 �? ,N .e t5' �'�� f��.\ \ \�� 3�
-'4)M?,R ucNr au_ NB$'12' 71Y 798.71' .� �s �o a,r ;� ��i,,� � \ \a\ tip 3'wrance swss
vuvEs — o �."1� cr � By. 'w.. e � � w � � ois�c M�aacn s:�Ec
i / \, . I R'� yF29'21'W 3• `� q \ k� � � y\\\ /�'k4i.GEO.SI;RVB�.R -c2i�a%3'
� � � fb 4 WATER WJ:HpIEJ� ( GROU D MlD OtlERUYfD N ��\\� D�3 RY1�31.B�� y� \ 1 �.F �R � tl � ��\\ \ \ \ 3� _x rI/f (C�'�'Oi�7ENTCN IJ 2127)
_ W/MIN.2'ASPW�LT o __ IEd831 Ia�5) / a �� � I ��• � \ � � \ '_�� }� „";,�SMlI..'
� oc�t m�t Fl e ro-��.�-o--�5753914^N j ` � � , �;' �0�3 � �.J I.fi�'` stea7
a J0.55 :R vri'h ._ a �° \ I � %J,��� '
� � a eRlp't - /�/I� �� W I, � / '� `�9! 7 ! p o
R.17«4 CCNC YON-� ` _.%LSSMG I � �� � � � �� s �.
%.%
i (I r �/ � '
� !W- kTTH 1 ?/4'E"+ASS � � + 9L4DMC q e� �1 j� 'yy�,, \ - • �' .
„ � � ^S�0.'/uNCH ��/ I • ! =\� � �'.'� . �..
PoWFR POLE- 9GN � C �� \ j.� ' �� C �, •.
N/'�Y11"%1RE g \ �
/ I / � b �.�L �..r �� "' •-i
� m . y. �� :o �n ...` ��� .:.�I
� �dSEFJ� �, � �.� 3 �
: �C / L �� �
� ` �... �I-• CCNC+ETE
; S�CN � � c�y � �� �.��.. � �P�L.�
i �` \, .,�'° � � �� � ` p �(� � BkiGGE i
; ,_�,J, � � e
I � �'� _' j��� i
' � I. �•xanr�� F c D .����.
� � \ ��� � srt�r
z sor+,t , . j �tiNr
o ,��
� �� �
� I w-� CITY OF RENTON
� ne�tnrEa: b " .l' '
i ( PROFl.IGiii A1M710N,ING I OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK3
zu w.�rsw�eono G H a C/ r.. ,� ��� �' � 'F�
K.Bq� Roarw�.wn eeass �f' tS Q � � Cf1ADBJG AND
C t E q�D F O R C o 1�L I A N C E �`�4 r R s (425)228-9510 Q' �I � /..,. S T O R A A D R A I N A C�P L A N
� TO Cf1Y STANDAFDB OP`4, i^� CONTACT:BE77�BE OR qANE PNi0l1� Q� � �.=�" Z � i � �
FNfJN�GF
�f'OR APPfiONAL ± � BARCF1Ai15EN CIXJSUL7ING QJGINEERS c+ � �j � � r; � � ACE A1MilON
I Date 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH y �j,�, ? i �y� ��� � py�� 03/06/13 fiE�a.
gy A� �5870.�0 �4.� KEM.WA 98032 `�'p� �W' P9' y �,,,, ��-� � OfuVM �OY
; � Date STE �Z. (425)251 6222 Tj � ��c a�ac� DF9 sc.uE ��_�� r��eoac P�_
� ; Z � ��h',tL �N�' (425)2i1-8782 FfJ( h�ENG�N
= oaca coti-rncs: c,w ea;�y 'rP"0`� -- - s�r a oF 6
PIPE CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS
15559-25.x1s
6ARGHAUSEN CONSULTING tNGINEERS-PIPF FI OW CALCULATOR
usiny ihe Rational Method 8 Manning Formula
KING COUNTY DESIGN FOR 25 YEAR STORM ,
JOB NAMF: ACC AVIATION NOTE ENTER DEFAULTS�ND STORM DATA BEFORE BFGINNING I
JOE3#: 75559 DEFAUI TS C= 0.9 n= 0.014 �
FILE NO.:15559-25.XLS d= 12 Tc= 6.3
A=Contributing Area(Ac) �d=Design Row(cfs) COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD'9r"-EQUATION �,
C=Runofi Coeflicienl Qf=Full Capacity Flow(cfs) STORM Ar Br I
Tc=Time of Concentration(min) Vd=Velocity at Design Flow(fps) 2YR 1.58 0.58 !
1=Intensity at Tc(in/hr) Vt=Velocity at Full Flow(fps) 70YR 2.44 0.64 PRECIP= 3.4
d=Diameler of Pipe(in) s=Slope of pipe(%) 25YR 2.66 0.65 Ar= 2.66
1.=Length of Pipe(fQ n=Manning Roughness Coefficient 50YR 275 0.65 Br= 0.65
D=Wator popth at Qd(in) Tt=Travel Time at Vd(min) 100YR 2.Fi1 0-63
FROM TO A 5 L d Tc n C SUM A A'C SUM A'C I QA Qf �dlQf D/d D Vf Vd Tt
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ --------- ----- ------ ------ ----- -------------- ----- ---- ..---- ------ '----- ------ ----- --� �
CBN C83 0.96 0.50 43 12 6.3 0.014 0.9 0.96 0.86 0.86 2.73 2.36 2.34 1.010 0.827 9.92 2.98 3.37 0.'li
C83 OWS 0.00 0.50 58 12 6.S 0.014 0.9 0.96 0.00 0.86 2.68 2.31 2.34 0.989 0.807 9.68 2.98 3.37 U.2J
OWS CD4 0.00 0.50 25 12 6.8 0.014 0.9 0.96 0.00 0.86 2.60 225 2.34 0961 0761 9.37 2.98 3.37 0.17
C82 CB1 0.30 0.40 61 tl (i.3 0.014 0.9 0.3 0.27 0.27 273 0J4 0.71 1.041 0.868 6.92 2.03 2.30 0.44
CB1 EXCB 021 1.04 23 8 (i./ 0.014 0.9 0.51 0.19 OA6 2.62 120 1.14 1.050 0.875 7.00 3.28 3.71 0.10
Payc 1
6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
There are no known special reports and studies to the best of our knowledge.
�
�
�
G
�
W
a
oc
W
_
H
O
0
�
� �
7.0 OTFiER PERMITS
Other permits for this project include a Right-of-Way Use Permit, Commercial Building Permit,
Clear and Grade Permit, Waterline Extension Permit, and Sanitary Side Sewer Permit.
15559.001
8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANALYSIS AND
DESIGN
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
For
� Ace Aviation Site Modifications
Prepared For
Ace Aviation, Inc.
289 East Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98057
Owner Developer Operator/Contractor
Ace Aviation, Inc. Ace Aviation, Inc. TBD
289 East Perimeter Road 289 East Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057
Project Site Location
289 East Perimeter Road
Renton, Washington
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead
TBD
SWPPP Prepared By
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 - 72nd Avenue South
, Kent, WA 98032
(425) 251-6222
a r
�,i Gdr, ���;io� ��ojee� ���C�.II ICC�
SWPPP Preparation Date
March 8, 2013
Approximate Project Construction Dates
May 2013
October 2013
;
I
,
� --,
I 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Contents
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Site Description...............................................................................................................3
2.1 Existing Conditions..............................................................................................3
2.2 Proposed Construction Activities .........................................................................3
3.0 Construction Stormwater BMPs ......................................................................................4
3.1 The 14 BMP Elements.........................................................................................4
3.1.1 Element#1 — Mark Clearing Limits .........................................................4
3.1.2 Element#2— Establish Construction Access..........................................4
3.1.3 Element#3 —Control Flow Rates............................................................5
3.1.4 Element#4— Install Sediment Controls ..................................................5
3.1.5 Element#5 — Stabilize Soils....................................................................6
3.1.6 Element#6— Protect Slopes...................................................................7
3.1.7 Element#7 — Protect Drain Inlets............................................................7
3.1.8 Element#8—Stabilize Channels and Outlets .........................................8
3.1.9 Element#9—Control Pollutants..............................................................8
3.1.10 Element#10—Control Dewatering .........................................................9
3.1.11 Element#11 —Maintain BMPs.............................................................. 10
3.1,12 Element#12—Manage the Project....................................................... 10
3.1.13 Element#13—Construction Stormwater Chemical Treatment.............. 12
3.1.14 Element#14—Construction Stormwater Filtration ................................ 18
3.2 Site Specific BMPs ............................................................................................ 19
4.0 Construction Phasing and BMP Implementation............................................................20
5.0 Pollution Prevention Team ............................................................................................21
5.1 Roles and Responsibilities.................................................................................21
5.2 Team Members .................................................................................................22
6.0 Site Inspections and Monitoring ....................................................................................23
6.1 Site Inspection...................................................................................................23
6.1.1 Site Inspection Frequency.....................................................................23
6.1.2 Site Inspection Documentation..............................................................23
6.2 Stormwater Quality Monitoring...........................................................................24
6.2.i 7urbidity Sampling ................................................................................24
6.2.2 pH Sampling .........................................................................................25
7.0 Reporting and Recordkeeping.......................................................................................26
7.1 Recordkeeping ..................................................................................................26
7.1,1 Site Log Book .......................................................................................26
7.1.2 Records Retention................................................................................26
7.1.3 Access to Plans and Records ...............................................................26
7.1.4 Updating the SWPPP............................................................................26
7.2 Reporting............................................................................................. .....27
7.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports...............................................................27
7.2.2 Notification of Noncompliance...............................................................27
II 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Appendix A Site Plans
Appendix B Construction BMPs
Appendix C Alternative BMPs
Appendix D General Permit
Appendix E Site Inspection Forms (and Site Log)
Appendix F Engineering Calculations
,o
I I I 15559.004
_
�
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan '
1.0 Introduction I
This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared as part of the '
NPDES stormwater permit requirements for the Ace Aviation Site Modification project in i
Renton, Washington. The proposed site is located at 289 East Perimeter Road, Renton �
Municipal Airport, Renton, Washington. I
Construction activities will include the demolition, modification and reconstruction of
buildings, asphalt parking lots, landscaping, utility work, including power, telephone, gas, cable
tetevision, water, sewer, and storm appurtenances with catch basin collection, pipe conveyance,
and stormwater quality facilities, etc. The purpose of this SWPPP is to describe the
proposed construction activities and all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment
control (TESC) measures, pollution prevention measures, inspectionlmonitoring
activities, and recordkeeping that will be implemented during the proposed construction
project. The objectives of the SWPPP are to:
1. Implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion
and sedimentation, and to identify, reduce, eliminate or prevent
� stormwater contamination and water pollution from construction '
i activity. '
2. Prevent violations of surface water quality, ground water quality, or !
sediment management standards.
3. Prevent, during the construction phase, adverse water quality
impacts including impacts on beneficial uses of the receiving water
by controlling peak flow rates and volumes of stormwater runoff at
the Permittee's outfalls and downstream of the outfalls.
This SWPPP was prepared using the Ecology SWPPP Template downloaded from the
Ecology website on July 2, 2005. This SWPPP was prepared based on the requirements
set forth in the Construction Stormwater General Permit, Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW 2005). The report is divided into seven main
_ sections with several appendices that include stormwater related reference materialc. Tn�
topics presented in the each of the main sections are:
■ Section 1 - INTRODUCTION. This section provides a summary
description of the project, and the organization of the SWPPP document.
■ Section 2 -SITE DESCRIPTION. This section provides a detailed
description of the existing site conditions, proposed construction activities,
and calculated stormwater flow rates for existing conditions and
post-construction conditions.
■ Section 3 -CONSTRUCTION BMPs. This section provides a detailed
description of the BMPs to be implemented based on the 12 required
elements of the SWPPP (SWMMEW 2004).
1 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
• Section 4 — CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND BMP IMPLEMENTATION.
This section provides a description of the timing of the BMP
implementation in relation to the project schedule.
■ Section 5— POLLUTION PREVENTION TEAM. This section identifies
the appropriate contact names (emergency and non-emergency),
monitoring personnel, and the onsite temporary erosion and
sedimentation control inspector
■ Section 6— INSPECTION AND MONITORING. This section provides a
description of the inspection and monitoring requirements such as the
— parameters of concern to be monitored, sample locations, sample
frequencies, and sampling methods for all stormwater discharge locations '�
from the site. �,
■ Section 7 — RECORDKEEPING. This section describes the requirements �i
for documentation of the BMP implementation, site inspections, ,
monitoring results, and changes to the implementation of certain BMPs i�
due to site factors experienced during construction. I
Supporting documentation and standard forms are provided in the following Appendices:
Appendix A— Site Plans I
Appendix B —Construction BMPs
Appendix C—Alternative BMPs
Appendix D—General Permit
Appendix E — Site Inspection Forms (and Site Log)
Appendix F — Engineering Calculations
2 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Preventron Plan
2.0 Site Description
2.1 Existing Conditions
Under existing conditions the site is 99% impervious consisting chiefly of buildings, asphalt
parking lots and concrete staging areas with 1% landscaping. The site is essentially flat with
catch basin collection and pipe conveyance to direct discharge to the Cedar River across East
Perimeter Road.
2.2 Proposed Construction Activities
The total site is 1.856 t acres in size of which only a portion will be demolished and
reconstructed. One building and a portion of another will be torn down and rebuilt larger so that
the total amount of PGIS will actually be less in proposed conditions that currently exist. In
addition, under proposed conditions the amount of landscaping will increase so that the overall
site will be 97.5% impervious. One oil/water separator will be removed and two oil/water
separators install in its stead.
Construction activities will include site preparation, TESC installation, building construction,
stormwater and utility appurtenance installation, and asphalt and concrete paving. The
schedule and phasing of BMPs during construction is provided in Section 4.0.
Stormwater runoff rates and volumes were calculated using the KCRTS hydrology model and
the oil/water separators were sized by treating the 91 percentile storm events.
� The following summarizes details regarding site areas:
■ Total site area: 1.856 acres
■ Percent impervious area before construction: 99%
■ Percent impervious area after construction: 97.5%
• Disturbed area during construction: 0.5 acres
■ Disturbed area that is characterized as impervious (i.e., access
r�ads, siaging, parking): 0.5 acre
All stormwater flow calculations are provided in Appendix F.
3 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
3.0 Construction Stormwater BMPs
3.1 The 14 BMP Elements
3.1.1 Element#1 —Mark Clearing Limits
To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits
of construction will be clearly marked before land-disturbing activities begin. Areas that are to
be preserved, as well as all sensitive areas and their buffers, shall be clearly delineated, both in
the field and on the plans, The BMPs relevant to marking the clearing limits that will be applied
for this project include:
■ High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103)
The clearing limits shall be as shown on the plans and all vegetation outside of the clearing
limits preserved.
Alternate BMPs for marking clearing limits are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool
for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or
inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES
Permit (Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a
violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or
more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are
�, ineffective or failing.
3.1.2 Element #2 — Establish Construction Access
Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where i
necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public i
roads, and street sweeping and street cleaning shall be employed to prevent sediment from
entering state waters. All wash wastewater shall be controlled on site. The specific BMPs .
related to establishing construction access that will be used on this project include:
■ The roads shall be swept daily should sediment collect on them. Wheel
washing shall occur at locations where the sediment will retain on site.
Alternate construction access BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the
onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate
during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit
(Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a
violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or
more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are
ineffective or failing.
4 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
3.1 .3 Element #3 - Control Flow Rates
In order to protect the properties and waterways downstream of the project site, stormwater
discharges from the site will be controlled by construction of a silt fence as one of the first items
of construction.
Alternate flow control BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite
inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during
construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix D),
To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation(s) of the
NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the Certified Erosion and
Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative
BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing.
The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, the project must
comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (Ecology 2005).
In general, discharge rates of stormwater from the site will be controlled where increases in
impervious area or soil compaction during construction could lead to downstrearn erosion, or
where necessary to meet local agency stormwater discharge requirements (e.g,, discharge to
combined sewer systems).
3.1.4 Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls
All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal
BMP before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged to the downstream
drainage course. The specific BMPs to be used for controlling sediment on this project include:
■ Silt Fence (BMP C233)
A silt fence shall be installed along the downstream perimeter of the proposed site. Alternate
sediment control BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite
_ inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during ,
construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix D). �
T�7 a�01u �:�i2i ii ai e�o�i�r a�G sz�ire��;,���r�E i�SJ2S �ilat iil&y �&uS@ a��o�a��e�(s� of iilE
NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the Certified Erosion and
Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative
BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing.
In addition, sediment will be removed from paved areas in and adjacent to construction work
areas manually or using mechanical sweepers, as needed, to minimize tracking of sediments on
vehicle tires away from the site and to minimize washoff of sediments from adjacent streets in
runoff.
Whenever possible, sediment-laden water shall be discharged into onsite, relatively level,
vegetated areas (BMP C240 paragraph 5, page 4-102).
5 15559.004
Stormwater Pollufron Prevention Plan
In some cases, sediment discharge in concentrated runoff can be controlled using permanent
stormwater BMPs (e.g:, infiltration swales, ponds, trenches). Sediment loads can limit the
effectiveness of some permanent stormwater BMPs, such as those used for infiltration or
biofiltration; however, those BMPs designed to remove solids by settling (wet ponds or sediment
ponds) can be used during the construction phase. When permanent stormwater BMPs will be
used to control sediment discharge during construction, the structure will be protected from
excessive sedimentation with adequate erosion and sediment control BMPs. Any accumulated
sediment shall be removed after construction is complete and the remainder of the site has
been stabilized.
The following BMPs will be implemented as end-of-pipe sediment controls as required to meet
permitted turbidity limits in the site discharge(s). Prior to the implementation of these
technologies, sediment sources and erosion control and soil stabilization BMP efforts will be
maximized to reduce the need for end-of-pipe sedimentation controls,
• Construction Stormwater Filtration (BMP C251)
• Construction Stormwater Chemical Treatment (BMP C 250) (implemented
only with prior written approval from Ecology).
3.1.5 Element #5 - Stabilize Soils
Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent
erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be
used on this project include:
■ Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120)
■ Mulching (BMP C121)
■ Dust Control (BMP C 140)
Seeding shall occur on all areas to remain unworked pursuant to below, Dust shall be
controlled if construction occurs during the summer. Alternate soil stabilization BMPs are
included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s)
lisiea above are aeemea inerfeciive or inappropriaie ouring construction to saiisiy ihe
requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion
and sediment control issues that may cause a violation(s) of the NPDES Construction
Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control '�
Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in
Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing.
The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, no soils shall remain
exposed and unworked for more than 7 days during the dry season (May 1 to September 30)
and 2 days during the wet season (October 1 to April 30). Regardless of the time of year, all
soils shall be stabilized at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on
weather forecasts.
6 15559At)4
Stormwafer Pollution Prevention Plan
In general, cut and fili slopes will be stabilized as soon as possible and soil stockpiles will be
temporarily covered with plastic sheeting. All stockpiled soils shall be stabilizeci from erosion.
protected with sediment trapping measures, and where possible, be located a�n�ay from storm
drain inlets, waterways, and drainage channF;
3.1.6 Element #6 — Protect Slope��
All cut and fill slopes will be designed, constructed, and protected in a manner that minimizes
erosion. The following specific BMPs will be used to protect slopes for this project;
■ Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C 120)
Temporary and permanent seeding shall be used at all exposed areas pursuant to the prior
mentioned schedule (seasonal restrictions).
Alternate slope protection BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the
onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate
during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit
(Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a
violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), tr
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of c
more of the alternatiue BMPs listed in Ap�endix C after the first sign that existing BMPs �
ineffective or failinc
3.1.7 Element „ - - - � =y�� �, �.;�, ,g�tm
All storm drain inlets and culverts made operable during construction shall be protected i�
prevent unfiltered or untreated water from entering the drainage conveyance system. Ho
the first priority is to keep all access roads clean of sediment and keep street wash water
separate from entering storm drains until treatment can be provided. Storm Drain Inlet
Protection (BMP C220) will be implemented for all drainage inlets and culverts that could
potentially be impacted by sediment-laden runoff on and near the project site. The following
inlet protection measures will be applied on this project:
• Excavated Drop Inlet Protection
• Block and Gravel Drop Inlet Protection
• Gravel and Wire Drop Inlet Protection
• Catch Basin Filters
� Culvert Inlet Sediment Trap
If the BMP options listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to
satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix D), or if no BMPs are
listed above but deemed necessary during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead shall implement one or more of the alternative BMP inlet protection options listed
in Appendix C.
7 15559.004
Stormwafer PoUutron Preventron
3.1.8 Element #8 - Stabilize Channels and Outlets
Where site runoff is to be conveyed in channels, or discharged to a stream or some other
natural drainage point, efforts will be taken to prevent downstream erosion. The specific BMPs
for channel and outlet stabilization that shall be used on this project include:
Alternate channel and outlet stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick re�
tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or
inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDE�
Permit (Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a
violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implemen#ation pf one or
more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existin� �MPs are
ineffective or failing.
The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest, As such, all temp�rary on-site
conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed, and stabilized to prevent erosion from the
expected peak 10 minute velocity of flow from a Type 1 A, 10-year, 24-hour recurrence interval
storm for the developed condition. Alternatively, the 10-year, 1-hour peak flow rate indicated by
an approved continuous runoff simulation model, increased by a factor of 1.6, shall be used.
Stabilization, including armoring material, adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent
streambanks, slopes, and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all
conveyance systems.
3.1.9 Element #9 - Control Pollutants
All pollutants, including waste materials and demolition debris, that occur onsite shall be
handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. Good
housekeeping and preventative measures will be taken to ensure that the site will be kept clean,
well organized, and free of debris. If required, BMPs to be implemented to control specific
sources of pollutants are discussed below. Vehicles, construction equipment, and/or ��etrc�leurn
product storage/dispensir :
■ All vehicle� ��, �.. �. _ �_._ . � ...�,. .�._�. _..� ,�... �....N.. ._.. � .. �._
will be inspected regularly to detect any leaks or spills, and to identifiy
maintenance needs to prevent leaks or spills.
■ On-site fueling tanks and petr
include secondary containmer
■ Spill prevention measures, suCll dS url� �dils, vviii ue us�u �vlie�
conducting maintenance and repair of vehicles or equipment.
■ In order to perform emergency repairs on site, temporary plastic will be
placed beneath and, if raining, over the vehicle.
• Contaminated surfaces shall be cleaned immediately following any
discharge or spill incident.
8 15559.004
Stormwater Pollufion Prevention Plan
Demolition:
■ Dust released from demolished sidewalks, buildings, or structures will be
controlled using Dust Control measures (BMP C140).
■ Storm drain inlets vulnerable to stormwater discharge carrying dust, soil,
or debris will be protected using Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BfVIP C220
as described above for Element 7).
■ Process water and slurry resulting from sawcutting and surfacing
operations will be prevented from entering the waters of the State by
implementing Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution Prevention measures
(BMP C152).
Concrete and grout:
■ Process water and slurry resulting from concrete work will be prevented
from entering the waters of the State by implementing Concrete Handling
measures (BMP C151).
3.1.10 Element #10 - Control Dewatering
All dewatering water from open cut excavation, tunneling, foundation work, trench, or
underground vaults shall be discharged into a controlled conveyance system prior to discharge
to the downstream drainage course. Channels will be stabilized, per Element #8. Clean, non-
turbid dewatering water will not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds, �nd will be
discharged to systems tributary to the receiving waters of the State in a manner that does not
cause erosion, flooding, or a violation of State water quality standards in the receiving water.
Highly turbid dewatering water from soils known or suspected to be contaminated, or from use
of construction equipment, will require additional monitoring and treatment as required for the
specific pollutants based on the receiving waters into which the discharge is occurring. Such
monitoring is the responsibiliry of the contractor.
- However, the dewatering of soils known to be free of contamination will trigger BMPs to trap
sediment and reduce turbidity. At a minimum, geotextile fabric socks/baqs/cells will be used to
filter this material. Other BMPs to be used for sediment trapping and turbidity reduction include
the following:
■ Concrete Handling (BMP C151)
Concrete shall be handled pursuant to BMP C151 wherever and whenever concrete is mixed
and poured at the project site.
Alternate dewatering control BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the
onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate
during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit
(Appendix D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a
violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (as provided in Appendix D), the
9 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or
more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are
ineffective or failing.
3.1.11 Element #11 - Maintain BMPs
All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be maintained and
repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Maintenance
and repair shall be conducted in accordance with each particular BMP's specifications. Visual
monitoring of the BMPs will be conduc#ed at least once every calendar week and within 24
hours of any rainfall event that causes a discharge from the site. If the site becomes inactive,
and is temporarily stabilized, the inspection frequency will be reduced to once every month.
All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after the final
site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped
sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil resulting from removal of BMPs
or vegetation shall be permanently stabilized.
3.1.12 Element #12 - Manage the Project
Erosion and sediment control BMPs for this project have been designed based on the following
principles:
■ Design the project to fit the existing topography, soils, and drainage
patterns.
■ Emphasize erosion control rather than sediment control.
■ Minimize the extent and duration of the area exposed.
■ Keep runoff velocities low.
■ Retain sediment on site.
■ Thoroughly monitor site and maintain all ESC measures.
■ Schedule major earthwork during the dry season.
In addition, project management will incorporate the key components listed below:
As this project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest, the project will be managed
according to the following key project components:
Phasing of Construction
■ The construction project is being phased to the extent practicable in order
to prevent soil erosion, and, to the maximum extent possible, the
transport of sediment from the site during construction.
10 ?�5�y.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
� I
Revegetation of exposed areas and maintenance of that vegetation shall
be an integral part of the clearing activities during each phase of I�,
construction, per the Scheduling BMP (C 162). '
Seasonal Work Limitations
■ From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil ,
disturbing activities shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of '�
the local permitting authority that silt-laden runoff will be prevented from
leaving the site through a combination of the following:
❑ Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil rype, '�I
and proximity to receiving waters; and ,
❑ Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
❑ Proposed erosion and sediment control measures.
■ Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the ,
local permitting authority may expand or restrict the seasonal limitation on
site disturbance.
■ The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing and
grading limitations:
❑ Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment I
control BMPs; '�
❑ Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do �I
not expose the soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil; �
and
❑ Activities where there is 100 percent infiltration of surface water runoff I
within the site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control
facilities.
Coordination with Utilities and Other Jurisdictions
• �G,e "as �e�^ taka^ t� c��r�i;�a�� w;." ;.atili:ies, :;.hc-r;,o„s.,;::,ti�r
projects, and the local jurisdiction in preparing this SWPPP and
scheduling the construction work.
Inspection and Monitoring
■ All BMPs shall be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to �
assure continued performance of their intended function. Site inspections
shall be conducted by a person who is knowledgeable in the principles
and practices of erosion and sediment control. This person has the
necessary skills to:
❑ Assess the site conditions and construction activities that could impact
the quality of stormwater, and ',
11 15559.004 III
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
❑ Assess the effecti�eness of erosion and sediment control measures used
to control the quality of stormwater discharges.
■ A Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall be on-site or on-call
at all times.
■ Whenever inspection and/or monitoring reveals that the BMPs identified
in this SWPPP are inadequate, due to the actual discharge of or potential
to discharge a significant amount of any pollutant, appropriate BMPs or
design changes shall be implemented as soon as possible.
Maintaining an Updated Construction SWPPP
• This SWPPP shall be retained on-site or within reasonable access to the
site.
■ The SWPPP shall be modified whenever there is a change in the design,
construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has,
or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters
of the state.
■ The SWPPP shall be modified if, during inspections or investigations
conducted by the owner/operator, or the applicable local or state
regulatory authority, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in
eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges
from the site. The SWPPP shall be modified as necessary to include
additional or modified BMPs designed to correct problems identified.
Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within seven (7) days
following the inspection.
3.1.13 Element #13 — Construction Stormwater Chemical
Treatment
Turbidity is difficult to controi once fine particles are suspended in stormwater runoff from a
construction site. Sedimentation ponds are effective at removing larger particulate matter by
gravity settling, but are ineffective at removing smaller particulates such as clay and fine silt.
Sediment ponds are typically designed to remove sediment no smaller than medium silt
(0.02 mm). Chemical treatment may be used to reduce the turbidity of stormwater runoff.
Chemical treatment can reliably provide exceptional reductions of turbidity and associated
pollutants. Very high turbidities can be reduced to levels comparable to what is found in
streams during dry weather. Traditional BMPs used to control soil erosion and sediment loss
from sites under development may not be adequate to ensure compliance with the water quality
standard for turbidity in the receiving water. Chemical treatment may be required to protect
streams from the impact of turbid stormwater discharges, especially when construction is to
proceed through the wet season.
Formal written approval from Ecology and the Local Permitting A�thority is required for
the use of chemical treatment regardless of site size. The intention to use Chemical
12 1555�.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Treatment shall be indicated on the Notice of Intent for coverage under the General
Construction Permit. Chemical treatment systems shouid be designed as part of the
Construction SWPPP, not after the fact. Chemical treatment may be used to correct
problem sites in limited circumstances with formal written approval from Ecology and
the Local Permitting Authority.
The SEPA review authority must be notified at the application phase of the project review (or the
time that the SEPA determination on the project is performed) that chemical treatment is
proposed. If it is added after this stage, an addendum will be necessary and may result in
project approval delay,
See Appendix II-B for background information on chemical treatment.
Criteria for Chemical Treatment Product Use
Chemically treated stormwater discharged from construction sites must be nontoxic to aquatic
organisms, The following protocol shall be used to evaluate chemicals proposed for stormwater
treatment at construction sites. Authorization to use a chemical in the field based on this
protocol does not relieve the applicant from responsibility for meeting all discharge and
receiving water criteria applicable to a site.
■ Treatment chemicals must be approved by EPA for potable water use.
■ Petroleum-based polymers are prohibited.
■ Prior to authorization for field use, jar tests shall be conducted to
demonstrate that turbidity reduction necessary to meet the receiving
water criteria can be achieved. Test conditions, including but not limited
to raw water quality and jar test procedures, should be indicative of field
conditions. Although these small-scale tests cannot be expected to
reproduce performance under field conditions, they are indicative of
treatment capability.
= rrior i� aui��riza�ior� i�r ��eld use, i�ie c�iemically i�ea�e� s�oe���ate�shal�
be tested for aquatic toxicity. Applicable procedures defined in
Chapter 173-205 WAC, Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing and Limits, shall
be used. Testing shall use stormwater from the construction site at which
the treatment chemical is proposed for use or a water solution using soil
from the proposed site.
■ The proposed maximum dosage shall be at least a factor of five lower
than the no observed effects concentration (NOEC).
■ The approval of a proposed treatment chemical shall be conditional,
subject to full-scale bioassay monitoring of treated stormwater at the
construction site where the proposed treatment chemical is to be used.
13 15559.004
� I reatment cnemicals that have already passed the above testing protocoi
do not need to be reevaluated. Contact the Department of Ecology
Regional Office for a list of treatment chemicals that have been �valuat;
and are currently ap�. ,
factors that determine optimum, cost-effective performance. It may not be possible ta '
incorporate all of the classic concepts into the design because of practical limit�tinns -�:
construction sites. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize the following
■ The right chemical must be used at the right dosage. A dosdge thai �-
either too low or too high will not produce the lowest turbidity. Ther� -
optimum dosage rate. This is a situation where the adage "addin
dispersion
■ A flocculation step is important to increase the rate of settling, ta prc
the lowest turbidity, and to keep the dosage rate as low as possible
■ Too little energy input into the water during the flocculation phase resu
in flocs that are too small and/or insufficiently dense. Too much energy
can rapidly destroy floc as it is formed.
• Since the volume of the basin is a determinant in the amount of energy
per unit volume, the size of the energy input system can be too small
relative to the volume of the basin.
■ Care must be taken in the design of the withdrawal system to minimize
outflow velocities and to prevent floc discharge. The discharge should be
airecied ihrougn a physical iilter such as a vegeiated swale ihat would
catch any unintended floc discharge.
Treatment System Design
Chemical treatment systems shall be designed as batch treatment systems using either ponds
or portable trailer-mounted tanks. Flow-through continuous treatment systems are not allowed
at this time.
A chemical treatment system consists of the stormwater collection system (either temporary
diversion or the permanent site drainage system), a storage pond, pumps, a chemical feed
system, treatment cells, and interconnecting piping.
14 15559.004
Stormwater Pollutlon Prevention Plan
The treatment system shall use a minimum of two lined treatment celis. Multiple treatment cells
allow for clarification of treated water while other cells are being filled or emptied. Treatment
cells may be ponds or tanks. Ponds with constructed earthen embankments greater than six
feet high require special engineering analyses. Portable tanks may also be suitable for some
sites.
The following equipment should be located in an operations shed:
■ the chemical injector;
■ secondary containment for acid, caustic, buffering compound, and
treatment chemical;
■ emergency shower and eyewash, and
■ monitoring equipment which consists of a pH meter and a turbidimeter.
Sizing Criteria
The combination of the storage pond or other holding area and treatment capacity should be
large enough to treat stormwater during multiple day storm events. It is recommended that at a
minimum the storage pond or other holding area should be sized to hold 1.5 times the runoff
volume of the 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Bypass should be provided around the chemical
treatment system to accommodate extreme storm events. Runoff volume shall be calculated
using the methods presented in Volume 3, Chapter 2. If no hydrologic analysis is required for
the site, the Rational Method may be used.
Primary settling should be encouraged in the storage pond. A forebay with access for ',
maintenance may be beneficial.
There are two opposing considerations in sizing the treatment cells. A larger cell is able #o treat
a larger volume of water each #ime a batch is processed. However, the larger the cell the longer
the time required to empty the cell. A larger cell may also be less effective at flocculation and
thereiore require a ionger seitling iime. i he simpiest approacn to sizing the ireatment cell is to
_ multiply the allowable discharge flow rate times the desired drawdown time. A 4-hour
drawdown time allows one batch per cell per 8-hour work period, given 1 hour of flocculation
followed by two hours of settling.
The permissible discharge rate governed by potential downstream effect can be used to
calculate the recommended size of the treatment cells. The following discharge flow rate limits
- shall apply:
■ If the discharge is directly or indirectfy to a stream, the discharge flow rate
shall not exceed 50 percent of the peak flow rate of the 2-year, 24-hour
event for all storm events up to the 10-year, 24-hour event.
' 1�J 15559.004
Stormwater Po!lution Prevent�on Plan
■ If discharge is occurring during a storm event equal to or greater than the
10-year, 24-hour event, the allowable discharge rate is the peak flouv rate
of the 10-year, 24-hour event,
■ Discharge to a stream should not increase the stream flow r�te by rrior�
than 10 percent.
■ If the discharge is directly to a lake, a major receiving water listed in
Appendix C of Volume I, or to an infiltration system, there is no discharge
flow limit.
■ If the discharge is to a municipal storm drainage system, the allowable
discharge rate may be limited by the capacity of the public systern. It may
be necessary to clean the municipal storm drainage system prior to the
start of the discharge to prevent scouring solids from the drainage
system,
■ Runoff rates shall be calculated using the methods presented in Volume
3, Chapter 2 for the pre-developed condition. If no hydrologic ar�alysis is
required for the site, the Rationai Method may be used.
Monitoring
The following monitoring shall be conducted, Test results shall be recorded on � daily log kept
on site:
Operational Monitorinq
■ pH, conductivity (as a surrogate for alkalinity), turbidity and temp�ratur�
of the untreated stormwater
■ Total volume treated and discharged
■ Discharge time and flow rate
■ Type and amount of chemical used for pH adjustment
■ Amount of polymer used for treatment
■ Settling time
��Of," i�Ij�i�iC=' n�nCf�i!vl:''.�;
---�-—..=:------__
- Jr-i ��I1C� tUik����dl�)� �_�' ti�,� 1f�Cc� (: ��I rn�: _
■ pH and turbidity of the receiving wat�
Biomonitorinq: Treated stormwater shall be tested for acute �lethal) toxicfty. E3ic�assays shall be
conducted by a laboratory accredited by Ecology, unless otherwise approved by Ecology. The
16 15559.004
r �II
��•�Ul � .r, i � __ � r _ �;Cii
pe���rrr�ar�ce s�ane�ard �o�acuYe ��xi�i�y is �� s�aYo��ie�hiy sig��fiear�i e�Af��-- . II�I
survival between the control and 100 percent chemically treated stormwat� ',
Acute toxicity tests shall be conducted with the following species and �; Ii
■ Fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas(96 hour statio- .: ,.: -,�, .. '!
method: EPA/600/4-90/027F). Rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus myki� I�
(96 hour static-renewal test, meth�-�' ����cnn�� nn+nn�rs .,. . �__
as a substitute for fathead minno� '
■ Daphnid, Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia !
static test, method: EPA/600/4-90/027F ,
All toxicity tests shall meet quality assurance criteria anca «�� ;;���U������� ��� ���� ��;�,� ;��e,;�
versions of the EPA test method and Ecology Publication #WO-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance
and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria.
Bioassays shall be performed on the firsi five batches and on every tenth batch thereafter, or as
otherwise approved by Ecology. Failure to meet the performance standard shall be immediately
reported to Ecology.
Discharge Compliance: Prior to discharge, each batch of treated stormwater must be
sampled and tested for compliance with pH and turbidity limits. These limits may be
established by the water quality standards or a site-specific discharge permit. Sampling and
testing for other pollutants may also be necessary at some sites. Turbidity must be within
5 NTUs of the background turbidity. Background is measured in the receiving water, upstream
from the treatment process discharge point. pH must be within the range of 6.5 to 8.5 standard
units and not cause a change in the pH of the receiving water of more than 0.2 standard units.
It is often possible to discharge treated stormwater that has a lower turbidity than the receiving
water and that matches the pH.
Treated stormwater samples and measurements shall be taken from the discharge pipe or
another location representative of the nature of the treated stormwater discharge. Samples
U5@Ci iOi-deiei-ffllfllfig �Ui�1�ilicl�i�� Wiiii if1@ {nlli@i C{�8iltjl Stcllli�afCaS iil ihZ �ecE�v��iy vvate��sha�� ilOt
be taken from the treatment pond prior to decanting. Compliance with the water quality
standards is determined in the receiving water.
Operator Training
Each contractor who intends to use chemical treatment shall be trained by an experienced
contractor on an active site for at least 40 hours.
Standard BMPs
Surface stabilization BMPs should be implemented on site to prevent significant erosion. All
sites shall use a truck wheel wash to prevent tracking of sediment off site.
17 15559.004
Stormwater Po!lution Prevention Plan
Sediment Removal and Disposal
■ Sediment shall be removed from the storage or treatment cells as
necessary. Typically, sediment removal is required at least once during a
wet season and at the decommissioning of the cells. Sediment remaining
in the cells between batches may enhance the settling process and
reduce the required chemical dosage.
' Sediment may be incorporated into the site away from drainages,
3.1.14 Element #14 - Construction Stormwater Filtratior�
Filtration removes sediment from runoff originating from disturbed areas of the site,
Traditional BMPs used to control soil erosion and sediment loss from sites under development
may not be adequate to ensure compliance with the water quality standard for turbidity in the
receiving water. Filtration may be used in conjunction with gravity settling to remove sediment
as small as fine silt (0.5 Nm). The reduction in turbidity will be dependent on the particle size
distribution of the sediment in the stormwater. In some circumstances, sedimentation and
filtration may achieve compliance with the water quality standard for turbidity.
Unlike chemical treatment, the use of construction stormwater filtration does not require �',
approval from Ecology. '
Filtration may also be used in conjunction with polymer treatment in a portable system to assure
capture of the flocculated solids,
Design and Installation Specifications— Background Information
Filtration with sand media has been used for over a century to treat water and wastewater. The
use of sand filtration for treatment of stormwater has developed recently, generally to treat
runoff from streets, parking lots, and residential areas. The application of filtration to
construction stormwater treatment is currently under development.
Two types of filtration systems may be applied to construction stormwater treatment: rapid and
slow. Rapid sand filters are the typical system used for water and wastewater treatment. They
can achieve relatively high hydraulic flow rates, on the order of 2 to 20 gpm/sf, because they
have automatic backwash systems to remove accumulated solids. In contrast, slow sand filters
have very Iow hydraulic rates, on the order of 0.02 gpm/sf, because they do not have backwash
systems. To date, slow sand filtration has generally been used to treat stormwatero Slow sand
filtration is mechanically simple in comparison to rapid sand filtration but requires a much larger
filter area.
Filtration Equipment
Sand media filters are available with automatic backwashing features that can filter to 50 µm
particle size. Screen or bag filters can filter down to 5 µm. Fiber wound filters can remove
18 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution�reventfon Plan
particles down to 0.5 µm. Filters should be sequenced from the largest to the smallest pore
opening. Sediment removal efficiency will be related to particle size distribution in #he
stormwater.
Treatment Process Description
Stormwater is collected at interception point(s) on the site and is diverted to a sediment poncl or
tank for removal of large sediment and storage of the stormwater before it is treated by the
_ filtration system. The stormwater is pumped from the trap, pond, or tank through the filtration
system in a rapid sand filtration system. Slow sand filtration systems are designed as flo�nr
j� through systems using gravity.
If large volumes of concrete are being poured, pH adjustment may be necessary.
Maintenance Standards
Rapid sand filters typically have automatic backwash systems that are triggered by a pre-set
pressure drop across the filter. If the backwash water volume is not large or substantially more
_ turbid than the stormwater stored in the holding pond or tank, backwash return to the pond or
' tank may be appropriate. However, land application or another means of treatment and
disposal may be necessary. I
� ■ Screen, bag, and fiber filters must be cleaned and/or replaced when they
�
become clogged.
;'� ■ Sediment shall be removed from the storage and/or treatment ponds as
necessary. Typically, sediment removal is required once or twice during
a wet season and at the decommissioning of the ponds.
3.2 Site Specific BMPs
Site specific BMPs are shown on the TESC Plan Sheets and Details in Appendix A. These site
specific plan sheets will be updated annually.
�
� .�
�- �
, i
19 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
4.0 Construction Phasing and BMP
Implementation
The BMP implementation schedule will be driven by the construction schedule. The following
provides a sequential list of the proposed construction schedule milestones and the
corresponding BMP implementation schedule. The list contains key milestones such as vvet
season construction.
The BMP implementation schedule listed below is keyed to proposed phases of the construction
project, and reflects differences in BMP installations and inspections that relate to wet season
construction. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, the dry
season is considered to be from May 1 to September 30 and the wet season is considered to be
from October 1 to April 30.
■ Estimate of Construction start date: May 2013
■ Estimate of Construction finish date: October 2013
■ Mobilize equipment on site:
■ Mobilize and store all ESC and soil stabilization products
(store materials on hand BMP C150): ____.��
■ Install ESC measures:
■ Install stabilized construction entrance:
■ Begin clearing and grubbing:
■ Temporary erosion control measures (hydroseeding): _
■ Site inspections reduced to monthly:
■ Begin concrete pour and implement BMP C151:
■ Excavate and install new utilities and services (Phase 1):
■ Complete utility construction:
• Begin implementing soil stabilization and sediment
control BMPs throughout the site in preparation for wet
season:
• WET SEASON STARTS: October 1, 2013
20 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
5.0 Pollution Prevention Team
5.1 Roles and Responsibilities
The pollution prevention team consists of personnel responsible for implementation of the
SWPPP, including the following:
■ Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) —primary
contractor contact, responsible for site inspections (BMPs, visual
monitoring, sampling, etc.); to be called upon in case of failure of any
ESC measures.
■ Resident Engineer— For projects with engineered structures only
(sediment ponds/traps, sand filters, etc.): site representative for the owner
that is the project's supervising engineer responsible for inspections and
issuing instructions and drawings to the contractor's site supervisor or
representative
_ ■ Emergency Ecology Contact— individual to be contacted at Ecology in
case of emergency. Go to the following website to get the name and
number for the Ecology contact information:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/org.html
■ Emergency Owner Contact— individual that is the site owner or
representative of the site owner to be contacted in the case of an
emergency.
■ Non-Emergency Ecology Contact— individual that is the site owner or
representative of the site owner than can be contacted if required.
■ Monitoring Personnel — personnel responsible for conducting water
quality monitoring; for most sites this person is also the Certified Erosion
and Sediment Control Lead.
; �
'
�
21 15559.004
Stormwater Po!lution Prevenfion Plan
5.2 Team Members
- Names and contact information for those identified as members of the pollution prevention team
are provided in the following table.
Title Name(s) Phone Number
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control TBD
Lead (CESCL)
Resident Engineer Ali Sadr (425) 251-6222
Emergency Ecology Contact Clay Keown (360) 407-6048
Emergency Owner Contact TBD
Non-Emergency Ecology Contact Ali Sadr (425) 251-6222
Monitoring Personnel TBD
22 15559 A04
Siorrrr��ti�ater�ollui�on Pre�i2ntior Plan
� ��� '`,^, `', y � - , `�_
�`,%�OililGiliil� ii;C�UCicS VISUd; IfIS�;�'-,C�I�,,, ;�(IOi�;IiC(IfIC� 101' ;Jat�.i yl!ctlli�i �.`2 c�''1�i�i5 0 ��,!'c��, r"!. ?Ai {
documentation of the inspection and monitoring findings in a site loc
be maintained for all on-site construction activities and will include:
• A record of the imc�lementation of the S!��Pp� and .�,'
requirements;
■ Site inspectior�
■ Stormwater quali�
For convenience, the inspection _ _. , _ _,___ ., __, _ , �_ ._
SWPPP include the required information for the site log book. This SWPPP may func
site log book if desired, or the forms may be separated and included in a separate site log book
However, if separated, the site log book but must be maintained on-site or within reasonable
access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction.
6.1 Site Inspection
All BMPs will be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued
performance of their intended function. The inspector will be a Certified Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead {CESCL) per BMP C160. The name and contact information for the CESCL is
provided in Section 5 of this SWPPP.
Site inspection will occur in all areas disturbed by construction activities and at all stormwater
discharge points. Stormwater will be examined for the presence of suspended sediment,
turbidity, discoloration, and oily sheen. The site inspector will evaluate and document the
effectiveness of the installed BMPs and determine if it is necessary to repair or replace any of
the BMPs to improve the quality of stormwater discharges. All maintenance and repairs will be
documented in the site log book or forms provided in this document. All new BMPs or design
changes will be documented in the SWPPP as soon as possible.
6.1.1 Site Inspection Frequency
' Site inspections will be conducted at least once a week and within 24 hours following any
rainfall event which causes a discharge of stormwater from the site. For sites with temporary
stabilization measures, the site inspection frequency can be reduced to once every month.
5.1.2 Site Inspection Documentation
The site inspector will record each site inspection using the site log inspection forms provided in
Appendix E. The site inspection log forms may be separated from this SWPPP document, but
will be maintained on-site or within reasonable access to the site and be made available upnn
request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction.
23 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
6.2 Stormwater Quality Monitoring
6.2.1 Turbidity Sampling
Monitoring requirements for the proposed project will include either turbidity or water
transparency sampling to monitor site discharges for water quality compliance with the 2005
Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix D). Sampling will be conducted at all
discharge points at least once per calendar week.
Turbidity or transparency monitoring will follow the analytical methodologies described in
Section S4 of the 2005 Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix D). The key
benchmark values that require action are 25 NTU for turbidity (equivalent to 32 cm
transparency) and 250 NTU for turbidity (equivalent to 6 cm transparency). If the 25 NTU
benchmark for turbidity (equivalent to 32 cm transparency) is exceeded, the following steps will
be conducted:
1. Ensure all BMPs specified in this SWPPP are installed and functioning as
intended.
2. Assess whether additional BMPs should be implemented, and document
revisions to the SWPPP as necessary.
3. Sample discharge location daily until the analysis results are less than
25 NTU (turbidity) or greater than 32 cm (transparency).
If the turbidity is greater than 25 NTU (or transparency is less than 32 cm) but less than
250 NTU (transparency greater than 6 cm) for more than 3 days, additional treatment BMPs will
be implemented within 24 hours of the third consecutive sample that exceeded the benchmark.
If the 250 NTU benchmark for turbidity (or less than 6 cm transparency) is exceeded at any
time, the following steps will be conducted:
1. Notify Ecology by phone within 24 hours of analysis (see Section 5.0 of ,
this SWPPP for contact information).
�. i,oniinue daily sampiing untii ti�e iuri�idity is less ihan �5 Iv�� (or
transparency is greater than 32 cm).
3. Initiate additional treatment BMPs such as off-site treatment, infiltration,
filtration and chemical treatment within 24 hours of the first 250 NTU
exceedance.
4. Implement additional treatment BMPs as soon as possible, but within
7 days of the first 250 NTU exceedance.
5. Describe inspection results and remedial actions taken in the site log
book and in monthly discharge monitoring reports as described in Section
7.0 of this SWPPP.
24 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
6.2.2 pH Sampling
Stormwater runoff will be monitored for pH starting on the first day of any activity that includes
more than 40 yards of poured or recycled concrete, or after the application of "Engineered Soils"
such as Portland cement treated base, cement kiln dust, or fly ash. This does not include
fertilizers. For concrete work, pH monitoring will start the first day concrete is poured and
continue until 3 weeks after the last pour. For engineered soils, the pH monitoring period begins
when engineered soils are first exposed to precipitation and continue until the area is fully
stabilized.
Stormwater samples will be collected daily from all points of discharge from the site and
measured for pH using a calibrated pH meter, pH test kit, or wide range pH indicator paper. If
the measured pH is 8.5 or greater, the following steps will be conducted:
1. Prevent the high pH water from entering storm drains or surface water.
2. Adjust or neutralize the high pH water if necessary using appropriate
technology such as CO2 sparging (liquid or dry ice).
3. Contact Ecology if chemical treatment other than CO2 sparging is
planned.
25 15559.004
�
� -. � �;_ � �;, 1 � � . �� — _6��
_ � �
�'o`� L' ����a���m;�;p� �:�«�
7.1.1 Site Log Book '
A site log book will be maintained for all on-site construction activities and v�lill include: 'I
• A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other �erm�t
requirements; I
■ Site inspections; and,
■ Stormwater quality monitoring.
For convenience, the inspection form and water quality monitoring forms included in this
SWPPP include the required information for the site logbook.
7.1.2 Records Retention
Records of all monitoring information (site log book, inspection reports/checklists, etc.), this
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and any other documentation of compliance with permit
requirements will be retained during the life of the construction project and for a minimum of
three years following the termination of permit coverage in accordance with permit condition
S5.C.
� 7.1.3 Access to Plans and Records
The SWPPP, General Permit, Notice of Authorization letter, and Site Log Book will be retained
� on site or within reasonable access to the site and will be made immediately available upon
request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. A copy of this SWPPP will be provided to Ecology
. within 14 days of receipt of a written request for the SWPPP from Ecology. Any other
information requested by Ecology will be submitted within a reasonable time. A copy of the
SWPPP or access to the SWPPP will be provided to the public when requested in writing in
accordance with Permit Condition S5.G.
7.1.4 Updating the SWPPP
In accordance with Conditions S3, S4.B, and S9.6.3 of the General Permit, this SWPPP will be
modified if the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in
stormwater discharges from the site or there has been a change in design, construction,
operation, or maintenance at the site that has a significant effect on the discharge, or potential
for discharge, of pollutants to the waters of the State. The SWPPP will be modified within seven
days of determination based on inspection(s) that additional or modified BMPs are necessary to
correct problems identified, and an updated timeline for BMP implementation will be prepared.
I
26 15559 004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Pfan
7.2 Reporting
7.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms will be submitted to Ecology because water quality
sampling is being conducted at the site.
7.2.2 Notification of Noncompliance
If any of the terms and conditions of the permit are not met, and it causes a threat to human
health or the environment, the following steps will be taken in accordance with permit
section S5.F;
1. Ecology will be immediately notified of the failure to comply.
2. Immediate action will be taken to control the noncompliance issue and to
correct the problem. If applicable, sampling and analysis of any
noncompliance will be repeated immediately and the results submitted to
Ecology within five (5) days of becoming aware of the violation.
3. A detailed written report describing the noncompliance will be submitted
to Ecology within five (5) days, unless requested earlier by Ecology.
27 15559.004 i
Stormwater Pollution Preventr'on Plan
Appendix A — Site Plans
I
28 17��g r�C-
Stormwater Po!lution Prevention Plan
Appendix B - Construction BMPs
Silt Fence (BMP C233)
Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120)
Mulching (BMP C121)
29 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Appendix C — Alternative BMPs
The following includes a list of possible alternative BMPs for each of the 12 elements not
described in the main SWPPP text. This list can be referenced in the event a BMP for a
specific element is not functioning as designed and an alternative BMP needs to be
implemented.
Element #� - Mark Clearing Limits
Element #2 - Establish Construction Access
Element #3 - Control Flow Rates
Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls
Advanced BMPs:
Element #5 - Stabilize Soils
Etement #6 - Protect Slopes
Element #� � Stabilize Channels an�l ��tlets
Element #10 - Control Dewaterii-c;
Ar�riiti�nal Ariv�nrP�! RMPS tn Cnr+ '
30 15559.004
�torm���ater Pvllutron Prev�nrron Plan
. ` �
31 15559.004
crorm�.���ater Poiiur�on �'r-cveniron �'�a��
Appendix � - Site Inspection �orms (and �ite Lo��`
The results of each inspection shall be summarized in an inspection report or checklist th�:i
entered into or attached to the site log book. It is suggested that the inspection report or
checklist be included in this appendix to keep monitoring and inspection information in on=
document, but this is optional; however, it is mandatory that this SWPPP and the site insp��_;::�_ ;
forms be kept onsite at all times durng construciion. ar;� that ��sr�ections be perforrned a���a
docui�nented as autline� belo��J.
,�t a minimum, eaci� i��spection �-eport o� ci72cklist s���all include�
a. Inspection date/times
b. Weather information: general cond�tions during �nspectioi�, a�,prc>ximate arr�ount
of precipitation since the last inspection, and approximate amount at prec�p�tation
within the last 24 hours.
c. A summary or list of all BMPs that have been implemented, includir�g
observations of all erosion/sediment control structures or practicps
d. The following shall be noted
i. locations of BMPs inspected.
ii. locations of BMPs that need n�ai,�
iii. the reason maintenance is needec
iv. locations of BMPs that failed to operate as designed or �ntended, anr
v. locations where additional or different BMPs are needed, and TnP ro;; -
why
e. A description of stormwater discharged from the site. The presence c �
suspended sediment, turbid water, discoloration, and/or oil sheen shall be not
as applicable.
f. A description of any water quality monitoring performed during inspection, anc
the results of that monitoring.
g. General comments and notes, including a brief description of any BMP repairs,
mainienance or insiallaiions maae as a result oi the inspection.
h. A statement that, in the judgment of the person conducting the site inspection,
the site is either in compliance or out of compliance with the terms and conditions
of the SWPPP and the NPDES permit. If the site inspection indicates that the
site is out of compliance, the inspection report shall include a summary of the
remedial actions required to bring the site back into compliance, as well as a
schedule of implementation.
i. Name, title, and signature of person conducting the site inspection; and the
following statement: "I certify under penalty of law that this report is true,
accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief'.
When the site inspection indicates that the site is not in compliance with any terms and
conditions of the NPDES permit, the Permittee shall take immediate action(s) to: stop, contain,
and clean up the unauthorized discharges, or otherwise stop the noncompliance; correct the
32 15559.004
pr�blem(s); impleme��t appropriate Best iviar�agei��ent Practices (BlviPsj, anc�ior cc���d�
maintenance of existing BMPs; and achieve compliance with all applicable standards a��a p_
conditions. In addition, if the noncompliance causes a threat to human health or the
environment, the Permittee shall comply with the Noncompliance Notification requirements �r
Special Condition S5.F of the permit.
� ;
;
_. �
�._
I
33 15559.004
Stormwater Pallutron Freventron Plan
Site inspectior� Form
General Informatian
Project Name: ACE Aviation Site Modifications
Inspector Name: TBD Title:
CESCL # :
Date: Time:
Inspection Type: ❑ After a rain event
❑ Weekly
❑ Turbidity/transparency benchmark exceedance
❑ Other
Weather
Precipitation Since last inspection In last 24 hours
Description of General Site Conditions:
Inspection of BMPs
Element 1: Mark Clearing Limits
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
Element 2: Establish Construction Access
RMP•
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
�
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
�I
�
34 1�s7�.oca
Stormwater Pollution Preventian Plan
Element 3: Control Flow Rates
BMP:
Location �nspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
Element 4: Insfall Sediment Controls
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP: J
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
' Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem'Corrective Actior,
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functionin�.
Y N Y N NIJ
(
;�l
35 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevent�on Plan
Element 5: Sfabilize Soils
BMP:
Location Inspected I=unctioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location �nspected Functioning Problem/Corrective �,ction
Y N Y N NIP
�
BMP:
Location �nspected Functioning p,-oblem/Corrective Actior�
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning
Y N Y N NIP
Element 6: Protecf S/opes
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
36 15559.004
Sformwater Po!lufion Preventron Plan
Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problern/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning ��oble���,Ce;rr�ctive ,�ct;on
Y N Y N NIP
,'
BMP:
Inspected Functioning
Location Y N Y N NIP Probleir�;`Co�r�ecti��� ac�ior�
BMP:
Location �nspected Functionin
Y N Y N Nlr - " " "
BMP:
Location �nspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
37 15559.004
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Element 9: Control Po/lutants
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
Element 10: Confrol Dewaterrng
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location �nspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
BMP:
Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action
Y N Y N NIP
Stormwater Discharges From the Site
Observed? Problem/Corrective Action
Y N
Location
Turbidity
Discoloration
Sheen
Location
Turbidity
Discoloration
Sheen
38 15559.U04
Stormwafer Po!lution Prevention Plan
Water Qualit Monitorin
Was any water quality monitoring conducted? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If water quality monitoring was conducted, record results here:
- If water quality monitoring indicated turbidity 250 NTU or greater; or transparency 6 cm
or less, was Ecology notified by phone within 24 hrs?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If Ecology was notified, indicate the date, time, contact name and phone number below:
Date:
Time:
Contact Name:
Phone #:
General Comments and Notes
Include BMP re airs, maintenance, or installations made as a result of the ins ection.
Were Photos Taken? ❑ Yes o No
If hotos taken, describe hotos below:
39 15559.O04
Storm��vater Pollutron F'revenhon Plan !
-- -- —-- ------ I
� _
�,�����.'�C�'��; i �, �����'��� �;�y1I ����� '� �r,��:;��������CU�:,,
�
__�
4� 15559.004
9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUIUIMARIES,
AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT
9.0 BOND QUALITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES,AND DECLARATION OF COVENAfVT
15559.001
10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
MANUAL
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Site and Building Modifications for
Ace Aviation
289 East Perimeter Road
Renton, Washington
Prepared for: '
Ace Aviation, Inc.
289 East Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98057
March 8, 2013
�u�Jo� I�o. �5559
GHA V
� "I�s� CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
m "_ Z 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032
� �`� - (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAx
�( �,,,'� ��i BRANCH OFFICES ♦ �LYMP�W b rgha Se.�C0111 TO,CA ♦ TEMECULA,C/�
>, �E
N�ENG�N
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 STATEMENTS
15559.005
1.0 STATEMENTS
The Operations and Maintenance Manual shalt be kept inside the office of the Ace Aviation
buiiding to be reviewed by the City of Renton at their discretion. Ace Aviation will be responsible
for maintenance of the on-site storm system. This Operations and Maintenance Manual has
been prepared to guide maintenance of the oil/water separator and the conveyance elements
contributing to the downstream drainage course. Relief across the site is on the order of 1 foot,
so it is relatively flat. The maintenance guidelines for the coalescing plate oil/water separator are
included on the following pages of this report. The maintenance guidelines for the landscaping
and conveyance facilities are also included. The site should be maintained on a regular basis,
once in the spring and once in the fall and more frequently should it be deemed necessary,
should sediment accumulate in the catch basins or pipes or oil accumulate in the oil/water
separators above and beyond a 6-month cycle of maintenance. On the following pages of this
report, the following are included:
• Maintenance checklists from the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual
• A recommended format for a maintenance activity log that will indicate what
maintenance actions have been taken for this facility
• An 11-by 17-inch map of the locations of the treatment facilities prominently noted
15559.005
V
�
J
�
H
�
F-
C�
Q
W
C.�
Z
Q
Z
W
� H
Z
Q
�
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY LOG
DATE:
Maintenance Component Defect Actions taken
�
15559.005
MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR DRAINAGE
FACILITIES
;
,
�
� _
�
�
�,
,
�,
,_ ,
� �
� �
APPENDIX A bfAIVTE�IA�ICE REQUIRE�4ENTS FOR FLO��CO\�TROL,COI�VLYA\CE,A1�U��'Q FACILITIES
NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES
Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is PerFormed
Structure Sediment Sediment exceeds 60%of the depth from the Sump of catch basin contains no
bottom of the catch basin to the invert of the sediment.
lowest pipe into or out of the catch basin or is
within 6 inches of the invert of the lowest pipe
into or out of the catch basin.
Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than Y:cubic foot which No Trash or debris blocking or
is located immediately in front of the catch basin potentially blocking entrance to
opening or is blodcing capacity of the catch basin qtch basin.
by more than 10%.
Trash or debris in the catch basin that exceeds No trash or debris in the catch basin.
'!s the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the
lowest pipe into or out of the basin.
Dead animats or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation
odors that could cause complaints or dangerous present within catch basin.
gases(e.g.,methane).
Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition present which would
volume. attract or support the breeding of
insects or rodents.
Damage to frame Comer of frame extends more than'/.inch past Frame is even with curb.
and/or top slab curb face into the street(if applicable).
Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or Top slab is free of holes and cracks.
cracks wider than Y.inch.
Frame not sitting flush on top slab,i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab.
separation of more than'/.inch of the frame from
the top siab.
Cracks in walls or Cracks wider than Y:inch and longer than 3 feet, Catch basin is sealed and
bottom any evidence of soil particles entering catch structurally sound.
basin through cracks,or maintenance person
judges that catch basin is unsound.
Cradcs wider than Y:inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than'/4 inch wide at
at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence the joint of inleUoutlet pipe.
� of soil particles entering catch basin through
cracks.
SettlemenU Catch basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design
misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. standards.
Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than Yrinch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at
inleUoutlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of inleUoutlet pipes.
the catch basin at the joint of the inlet/outlet
pipes.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
InIeVOutlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20%or more of the pipe. InleUoutlet pipes ciear of sediment
accumulation
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inleUoutlet No trash or debris in pipes.
pipes(includes floatables and non-floatables).
Damaged Cracks wider than%rinch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at
iniet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inletloutlet pipe.
at the joints of the inletlouUet pipes.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1/9/2009
A-9
APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL,COWEYANCE,Aiv'D WQ FACILIT[ES
NO. 5�CATCH �ASINS AND MANHOLES
Main4enance Defect or Problem Conditio�When Maintenance is Pleeded Resuits Expected LNlhen
Component Maintenance is Performed
Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than'!e inch. Grate opening meets design
(Catch Basins) standards.
Trash and debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grate free of trash and debris.
of grate surtace. footnote to guidelines for disposai
Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s)of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design
Any open structure requires u�gent standards.
maintenance.
Manhole Cover/Lid Covedlid not in place Coverllid is missing or only partially in place. CoverRid protects opening to
Any open structure requires urgent structure.
maintenance.
Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools.
i Not Working maintenance person with proper tools.Bolts
cannot be seated. Self-locking coverAid does not
work.
Covedlid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Coverllid can be removed and
Remove covedlid after applying 80 Ibs.of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance
person.
1/9/2009 2009 Surface��'ater Design Manual—Appendix A
A-10
APPE�TDIX A MAI_VTEI�A�ICE REQL'IREviENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL,CO'�VEYANCE,A'VD���Q FACILITIES
NO. 6-CON1/EYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is Performed
Pipes Sediment&debris Accumulated sediment or debris that exceeds Water flows freely through pipes.
accumulation 20%of the diameter of the pipe. �
VegetatioNroots Vegetationlroots that reduce free movement of Water flows freely through pipes. ',
water through pipes.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
Damage to protective Protective coadng is damaged;rust or corrosion Pipe repaired or replaced.
coating or corrosion is weakening the structural integriry of any part of
pipe.
Damaged Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced.
pipe by more than 20%or is determined to have
weakened stnictural integrity of the pipe.
Ditches Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 Trash and debris deared from
square feet of ditch and slopes. ditches.
Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20%of the Ditch cleanedlflushed of all sediment
accumulation design depth. and debris so that it matches design.
Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation
constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to applicable
public. regulations. No danger of noxious
vegetation where County personnel
or the public might normally be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete siurries or paint. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water Water flows freely through ditches.
through ditches.
Erosion damage to Any erosion observed on a ditch slope. Slopes are not eroding.
slopes
Rock lining out of One layer or less of rock exists above native soil Replace rocks to design standards.
place or missing(If area 5 square feet or more,any exposed native
Applicable) soil.
2009 Surface«/ater Design�lanual—Appendix A 1/9/2009
A-11
. . ;'. '. . ., �. -,.., . ,�� ��, '... i '� . . .. : :'l'., i .i . . .. , . .���..� . �." � . . ',. . .. �
NO. 9-FENCINC
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is Performed
Site Erosion or holes Erosion or holes more than 4 inches high and 12- No access under the fence.
under fence 18 inches wide permitting access through an
opening under a fence.
Wood Posts,Boards Missing or damaged Missing or broken boards,post out of plumb by No gaps on fence due to missing or
and Cross Members parts more than 6 inches or cross members broken broken boards,post plumb to within
1Y:inches,cross members sound.
Weakened by rotting Any part showing structural deterioration due to All parts of fence are structurally
' or insects rotting or insect damage sound.
Damaged or failed Concrete or metal attachments deteriorated or Post foundation capable of
' post foundation unable to support posts. supportng posts even in strong
wind.
Metal Posts,Rails Damaged parts Post out of plumb more than 6 inches. Post plumb to within 1%z inches.
and Fabric
Top rails bent more than 6 inches. Top rail free of bends greater than
1 inch.
Any part of fence(including post,top rails,and Fence is aligned and meets design
fabric)more than 1 foot out of design alignment. standards.
Missing or loose tension wire. Tension wire in place and holding
fabric.
Deteriorated paint or Part or parts that have a rusting or scaling Structurally adequate posts or parts
protective coating condition that has affected structural adequacy. with a uniform protective coating.
Openings in fabric Openings in fabric are such that an S-inch Fabric mesh openings within 50%of
diameter ball could fit through. grid size.
_ i
� ��i -
' I .
, '
1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A
' A-14
APPENDIX A MAI�ITENArCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYAhCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
' NO. 10- Gi4TES1�OLLARDS/ACCESS �ARRIERS
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Eupected When
Component Maintenance is Performed
Chain link Fencing Damaged or missing Missing gate. Gates in place.
Gate members
Broken or missing hinges such that gate cannot Hinges intact and lubed.Gate is
be easily opened and closed by a maintenance working freely.
person.
Gate is out of plumb more than 6 inches and Gate is aiigned and vertical.
more than 1 foot out of design alignment.
Missing stretcher bar,stretcher bands,and ties. Stretcher bar,bands,and ties in
place.
Locking mechanism Locking device missing,no-functioning or does Locking mechanism prevents
does not lock gate not link to all parts. opening of gate.
Openings in fabric Openings in fabric are such that an&inch Fabric mesh openings within 50%of
diameter ball could fit through. grid size.
Bar Gate Damaged or missing Cross bar does not swing open or closed,is Cross bar swings fully open and
cross bar missing or is bent to where it does not prevent closed and prevents vehicle access.
vehicle access.
Locking mechanism Locking device missing,no-functioning or does Locking mechanism prevents
does not lock gate not link to ail parts. opening of gate.
Support post Support post does not hold cross bar up. Cross bar held up preventing vehicle
damaged access into facility.
Boliards Damaged or missing Bollard broken,missing,does not fit into support No access for motorized vehicles to
' hole or hinge broken or missing. get into facility.
Does not lock Locking assembly or lock missing or cannot be No axess for motorized vehicles to
attached to lock bollard in place. get into facility.
Boulders Dislodged Boulders not located to prevent motorized vehide No access for motorized vehicles to
access. get into facility.
Circumvented Motorized vehicles going around or between No access for motorized vehicles to
boulders. get into facility.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1/9,�2009
A-15
APPENDIX A MAItiTENANCE REQtiIREME�ITS FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,A�TD WQ FACILITIES
NO. 11 -GROUNDS (LAN�SCAPING)
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
� Component RAaintenance is Performed
Site Trash or litter Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from site.
' per 1,000 square feet(this is about equal to the
amount of trash it would take to fill up one
standard size office garbage can). In general,
there should be no visual evidence of dumping.
Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation
constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to applicable
public. regulations. No danger of noxious
vegetation where County personnel
or the public might normally be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials rernoved and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regula6ons.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surtace oil film.
Grass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcover mowed to a
height. height no greater than 6 inches.
Trees and Shrubs Hazard Any tree or limb of a tree identified as having a No hazard trees in fadlity.
potential to fall and cause property damage or
' threaten human life. A hazard tree identified by
a qualified arborist must be removed as soon
as possible.
Damaged Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split or Trees and shrubs with less than 5°/a
, broken which affect more than 25%of the total of total foliage with split or broken
foliage of the tree or shrub. limbs.
Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or No blown down vegetation or
knocked over. knocked over vegetation. Trees or
shrubs free of injury.
Trees or shrubs which are not adequately Tree or shrub in place and
supported or are leaning over,causing exposure adequately supported;dead or
of the roots. diseased trees removed.
1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design�fanual—Appendix A
A-l6
APPENDIX A MAINTENAIvCE REQUIRE:VIENTS FOR FLOW CON I'ROL,CONVEYANCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
PI�. 23-�0�4LESCING PLATE OILIVII�►T�F�SEP�►FtATOR
Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is Pertormed
Site Trash and debris Any trash or debris which impairs the function of Trash and debris removed from
the facility. facility.
Contaminants and Floating oil in excess of 1 inch in first chamber, No contaminants present other than
pollution any oil in other chambers or other contaminants a surface oil film.
of any type in any chamber.
Vault Treatment Sediment Sediment accumulation of 6 inches or greater in No sediment in the forebay.
Area accumulation in the the forebay.
forebay
Discharge water not Inspection of discharge water shows obvious Repair function of plates so effluent
clear signs of poor water quality-effluent discharge is clear.
from vault shows thick visible sheen.
Trash or debris Trash and debris accumulation in vault Trash and debris removed from
accumulation (floatables and non-floatables). vault.
' , Oil accumulation Oil accumulation that exceeds 1 inch at the water No visible oil depth on water and
surface in the in the coalescing plate chamber. coalesang plates clear of oii.
Coalescing Plates Damaged Plate media broken,deformed,cracked andlor Replace that portion of inedia pack
showing signs of failure. or entire plate pack depending on
severity of failure.
Sediment Any sediment accumulation which interferes with No sediment accumulation
accumulation the operation of the coalescing plates. interfering with tne coalescing
plates.
Vault Structure Damage to Wall, Cracks wider than Yrinch and any evidence of Vault replaced or repaired to design
Frame,Bottom,and/or soil particles entering the structure through the specifications.
Top Slab cracks,or maintenance inspection personnel
determines that the vault is not structurally
sound.
Baffles damaged Baffles corroding,cracking,warping and/or Repair or replace baffles to
showing signs of failure as determined by specifications.
maintenancefinspection person.
Ventilation Pipes Plugged Any obstruction to the ventilation pipes. Ventilation pipes are clear.
Shutoff Valve Damaged or Shutoff valve cannot be opened or closed. Shutoff valve operates normally.
inoperable
Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20%or more of the pipe. InleUouUet pipes clear of sediment.
accumulation
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/ouUet No trash or debris in pipes.
pipes(includes floatables and non-floatables).
Damaged Cracks wider than%z-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at
inleUoutlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inleUoutlet pipe.
at the joints of the inletloutlet pipes.
Access Manhole Covedlid not in place CoverAid is missing or only partially in place. Manhole access covered.
My open manhole requires immediate
maintenance.
Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools.
not working maintenance person with proper tools.Bolts
cannot be seated. 5elf-locking covedlid does not
work.
CoveNlid difficult to One maintenance person qnnot remove CoverAid can be removed and
remove coverAid after applying 80 Ibs of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance
person.
Ladder rungs unsafe Missing rungs,misalignment,rust,or cracks. Ladder meets design standards.
Allows maintenance person safe
access.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A l/9/2009
A-3 3
APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
fVO. 23-COAI�ESCINC; PLATE OIUWATER�EP�►RAl'OfZ
Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is Performed
Large access Damaged or difficult Large access doors or plates cannot be Replace or repair access door so it
doors/plate to open opened/removed using normal equipment. can opened as designed.
, Gaps,doesn't cover large access doors not flat and/or access Doors close flat and cover access
� completely opening not completely covered. opening completely.
Lifting Rings missing, Lifting rings not capable of lifting weight of door Lifting rings sufficient to lift or ,
rusted or plate. remove door or plate. ,
1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A
A-34
Z
Q
J
0.
W
C�
Q
Z
�
�
�
Z
Q
C�
Z
0
�
C�
' PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ` ,,/)
� � � -� re�.
� �� � � A,It.1 �Ir
i 3 � �';� � � � :� FOR � /' �
`� , �`�.` �� �`�y qCE AVIATION
� r=30 `'�_,��, ����•,.��, f
� o ,s so eo �'" y=• \`�� NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TWP. 23 N., RGE.5 E., W.M. �
V��� ��' �f� CfT1'OF RENTON, KINC COUNTY, WASHINGTON
� Fa:�=�c.�� � i �
Q,� Lr�l?.42!2c'cA') � �:b. � �
'E=76.27 4i4'SE) y,�'� '\ �'�\� I
/� R_�ILTE�
Q /�`\} ` �� �\\� �1CCS5 SIGX
� `�� ' � �\�
a r�i �d Za �� � �a '
;� �
� o�� °a .., �� ura�r„ F` /� :�\�k. . �I
Z W ' y ���:\�
��Q � (S �Dr- � �, \�` :"• �
s�3 c°� ? ���� � �`� %� , � '�>,�� �-�
a �y,,� ��� ' ��\ -����
a�Z �¢ Q .-____— _.. ss--�j---� d � �/.�, -T � .,r,,,, .45 \'�'y�
� (�fJ�W O Q � n�7� / \qf , �—�°— �' -- -c_\` . ��\�( � .
� Q a.� �� r�+x!� ,�\ / /, u \` , \ �`�...\\\\\�
� �LL1 w ,� �y�� s`� �. ���.
Q � �,�2.� � ,���,.1� � r�; .,��c� ����J I
� enrnq�c V.. �_��' ,C- •� 3t.5:\� \\�,�\" II
B'J NG / 4 �`� r�/ i .7 , � C \\ i
BOLW'tC � '�� ��- �`.�� ��•'-r, .. s'%��, ��.� °�.,q \�
� �� �� { `�� , `�.f \\�
�� ��� `� '\ �C, .- ,f. \�� WA'EA V.WLT
/ -. \`��' � �,rY� •"� j L •� Y� ��� IX.DD(.v ASSEHBLY
oX o�`�, .ya �u ,� , S'4`,`. � � TO RFlAAIN
s �' �00i' , �\'\� ��
/�, / �� �� ' . a\ �.J��. ,\ � � , � �� O
. � �� , ;+� �' � ��;���� .q�
i �y o /\ „u,rv ,�L I ' NEW 0.5PWILT PAVEMENT� . ���': ..� . � \/\� �
F-y ` C&-N IYPE 1 � 47/ � '� . '� - t'�� 4t9 ��.\ �� iiYORAM �
> o 0 0 �,z� � G�o,p � :�� :,� �� .� �,. �. 9
3 E�28.97�12'� t�- / � �� ..,. .:.. �E �' � �� � 3, \
„ E=zan(ts•p � um-r o � ' /�/' ��� ` � Q . \
�/� (I' P /� � \\�
�� � :CJ M�ATEA V. G0.S G�GE @ r� V�T- ��V�G ��/ • LI����. �. O cCk. `. \\L� .
�W d VALVES �� :AS 9AV(OUT O� �ELEC a(7 _ \\
w c .� � ON�W.(LL - �. \ �
~ - � =JE�_lL`��. ��Bg 'W�.• `a�\
� �Q ti�l,,.� ,. � F�.eGi �4�pp�;,� '� � � �\"
j Q ,�s vw,�� I wo�,�r 32.26 °3?��N� uEr�s , y � �``�\
FlRE � 't ��
� . ua .�:. �.oouK���A� \�\ ���,�\
� w �I c ir— t - �9/�
a �� � i.' � ,• '/ \•� � c :� �\�._�i-. . ',
� � , � ..'� \. �_. \ �� \ �� E 17 7 �E;
� ��. t— -- 31 bb •,•� �.. -�.+� \�'��e t F, _ :5v;
a o ` � � '9p �� �\' `
� z? � :. .� r '• fi / ?a,e., � ,9 ' ��� �� ca-e
� � : �! 1 I� =�� �� I 1 - f � Gi� aarea Qr .� �� 1+�2s.n
' Y o i a f ,1 �. F,��Ci,y� �o� '`¢ � \ � ��2e.x2(e'st7 _
�� '�'� ! 1 ' �N �; ° {' •J � ,iY�'' ��'��,�: � ��eo� 1 \\ '.\ '� souH-B
. rwE�l �' �`�� o ! �1�� 7 / /"� � , ���\ � � �� ,,�, ♦ SW1�29.78
t � a �n •: c � k a..3T 68� 3226 � � `\ �� . � E=24.13(12'H1h `
z � \ i������ 'ti� ! � � � � `� i ���� 1'1` ��� ���� ��E�f3.iB(24'�
i y�a . `� � 'aiK.�NG AR..A (t{ . � � ` w \ 9GN
i,. +���g ��, \ � �� 3�V .��T 26 � �' \\\ � V�� ' `'k:.
f ���� - � � �' . a_ � s�+ � � �� �
� � � � L �
� �� � � \ �.N�(E''� � y�' i� gM �.� : �\\\\ ` :. ����;,\ �� \��\\ �
- prLL IEeT9.15(12'!!� \ �i% ^'�. 1 Si.6� ��i� \� � j� �\jv� '\ \�: \\\\\\ \.
'.�`J � � n '` ! I(� . / !i\ � q' \ \ � \\\\ CONtl2ETE o
� -- _ LEASE SAWCUTJ ` . .� V\T � ��p.. �,._'8\� .��� �\�\ \� 8�� �
AoP4070WIE LN�(IYPICa1) - .
s��-:� �NE ,: � �: - �, q--�_���s �y _ ����'� � �
vILVES� UGfif aaSE.. _• �� _ IXISIPlG AC TO BE �I--- -�' j �ar �\\q"� �'r,�L`• \ \ �'� I FlC 7':uRF�E 3u55 ..
�`, ��/ GROUND.51ND OVERUYED j �" I \ J � \ \ � �\ DISK W/f'NCH�ANPED E
I � g '� �U , �__ _ cs-K rrvE� � � � �� � \ \ �s � � \ 'NA.CEO.SUR4EY.R-452/157J' u
j[ / r g„ \�` f011.31.16 � � �� � 4 \`'` `.{ \ �� � ,• (CfIY OF RFIITON ID 2120)
� � � ig WATER WNHd.EJ ______— � Em1BJ1(8'S) � CB-F � " \ �
, __ ,." �;' � {� �� .`�� �j����� I_ {j ��.x �4ah. .
I''� a Y P�43�.5�5 i Fla=-wfA vA_k ' � --- �'/ 1t� �1� \ i I' �/� `\` �J . ` � � �- E
' ' a ff=29.60(8'HW) � � �,,�__z���\ � / `i"�9 M ,.' i r J�'. f°'.,. cyi n
I . a MIH 14J/4NBRlSS ���/I��: � e�uinn�c p �� ,� �' � �'� �. i' +.��� �_ '
'I `,a \`��
X I I ,, o D6C N'/PNLH / "I PONER POIE 9GN � � y i� m� _ - i
W/WV MRE � �' ,f
� I m � I �" �&" \y � �. �� .. af � �'� �] __
z'1 S• � '���5 . I
I � cL R15ER 4GN �y\� 3 : / c.
� ��CB� 'J..\ o g .sl . ��� i
I Q/ C $.I d' .`•� ,� L�NCRcTE o,
� 5 SKN \ �F�ti � i� � � ,k� �':�.1.- _ WAl1 OV i:
I W F f � BRIDGE
� I \. �.� \ \�➢ m O y4..^��_i.; . a /
i J-�x ��{ \\r =l ��` I.' C
I H/DRAHT�'.. , \ C P `�.I��� �' /
l
� \'�. -,,�1 �� I
� ��i -
i Z . "'
I SIRcET
••Mf-A y�
T
O UGH
\ I` y �
1j/� \ I -
� W .48 �i `� �� / j' .��`�� �
' � ��o�� ' CITY OF RENTON ,`I
I '�. . PROFLIGM AVfATION,IriC. u �EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
� � 243 W. PERIYEIER RDAD G^A(/ T
� \�K. Bq� �` �rrrorr.w�eeoss � � � �J�(j�'(�i�a�a l��
CF£CI�FOflCObPL.I/�10E � p4 aRs (425)228-9510 P � � Q
�� � TO CITY.4�APDARDB OPl� �l� CONfACT:BERNIE OR DWJE PAHOLICE Q� ..�� Z STORM DRAINAGE PL.AN z
��
I � BY � &RGHAUSEN CONSULiiNG ENGINEERS c'�,. J .; ACE ANAl10N �
Z.' v,��� pAre 03/O6/13 F4.E Mp. '7
r 18215 72ND AYEPAIE SOl1iH � �� _ °E'"�+� � O
.. I � Date ��� 25672 EO 4,� KENT,WA 98032 G TI y� pqpyqy NDY
� 0 Dute s hASTEEG�?``' (425J257-6222 �T� � E'ce p,'�pc� 7�9 yc,uE 1`=3'�' FgngapK p,uf_ W
, _ ,' Z � �� �4 (42�j251-8782 FAX N�ENGIN
� '� Gate CCNTA�-: DAIJ &1�MELL� �'Pn�:� . _ __..- — y�� C3 p� 5 �
_--_.--P,�c.;�.,< ___—_ __ m
P:\15000s\15559\nreliminarv\15559-apm.dwq. 3/7/2013 1:48:50 PM. \\MERCURY�Oce TDS700 - main CAD