HomeMy WebLinkAbout03814 - Technical Information Report �� l.�(� u�G 3� �
�
�� �� �-
`
�
m TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
' Plat of Copperwood (a.k.a. Stuth Property)
Renton, Washington
Prepared for:
, The Quadrant Corporation
' 14725 S.E. 36th Street, Suite 200
, Bellevue, WA 98006
Revised April 29, 2015
' Revised April 7, 2015
Revised February 13, 2015
December 2, 2014
Our Job No. 16834 !,
�y J. T A ��
' �P��a� w a �y ��
� ,
� z
� o
N Z
0 41423 Q ��
�F ��STE��' ��,
GHAV
�s�NA L ��1G�
4 �►� s� 04/29/15
� 1� ? 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX
° ` ? BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER,WA ♦ LONG BEACH,CA ♦ ROSEVILLE,CA ♦ SAN DIEGO,CA
0
�� y� www.barghausen.com
<r�N ��4
I C ENG�N
(
3 8/�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
Figure 1 —TIR Worksheet
Figure 2—Site Location
Figure 3— Drainage Basins, Subbasins, and Site Characteristics
Figure 4—Soils
' Figure 5— FEMA Map
Figure 6—Sensitive Areas Map
2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
2.1 Analysis of the Core Requirements
2.2 Analysis of the Special Requirements
2.3 Hearing Examiner Conditions
2.4 SEPA Conditions
3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
A. Existing Site Hydrology
B. Developed Site Hydrolagy
C. Performance Standards
D. Flow Control System
E. Water Quality System
5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
7.0 OTHER PERMITS
7.1 Postmaster/ Mailbox Locations Approval
7.2 Hydraulic Project Approval
7.3 NPDES Permit
8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (CSWPPP) ANALYSIS
AND DESIGN
9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECI.ARATION OF COVENANT
9.1 Bond Quantities
9.2 Facility Summary Form
9.3 Declaration of Covenant for Impervious Surface Limit '
16834.015.doc
9.4 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilites and
BMPS
10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A- Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan
APPENDIX B- Downstream Drainage Complaints
16834.015.doc
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed Plat of Copperwood is a single-family residential project consisting of 47 lots zoned
R4, and will be utilizing the small lot clustering provisions. The project is 12.68 acres in size,
containing 8 tax parcels (152305-9066, 152305-9067, 152305-9201, 152305-9100, 152305-9093,
152305-9170, 152305-9043, and 152305-9221). The site is located at the intersection of 143rd '
Avenue S.E. and S.E. 2nd Place, in a portion of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in the City of Renton.
The site is rectangular in shape and fronts S.E. 2nd Place. The proposed on-site roads are to be
tied into S.E. 2nd P�ace, and will be extended into the site to provide public access and
circulation. This site is currently developed, with seven single-family residences and is currently
zoned R4. The existing on-site improvements consist of storm and water utilities, and gravel ,
driveways that access S.E. 2nd Place. There is a creek on-site (Maplewood Creek Tributary
0303), near the east property line. The existing site drains to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303, '
where it then leaves the site near the southeast comer. The existing discharge point is to be
maintained after development.
The site is bound along the east property line by 143rd Avenue S.E. To the south and west the
site is bound by single-family residences. The southeast corner of the site contains steep slopes
ranging from 15 percent to 70 percent. These steep slopes will be contained within a Natural
Growth Protection Area (NGPA) Tract. On the north side of the site is bound by S.E. 2nd Place.
Accessing the site from S.E. 2nd Place will require frontage improvements, including new asphalt
and new curb and gutter, with sidewalk and planter strip.
On-site soils are mapped as Alderwood. Please refer to the Figure 4 — Soils Map within this
section. All drainage calculations were modeled as till soils.
The project will be constructing new roadways consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and street
trees. The site will tie into the existing road at S.E. 2nd Place. All roads for this project have
oeen designed '[v oe �o ieei wide, wiiii aii o-iuvi �iaiiiei 3iiiN ai iiic back of curb and a 5-foot
sidewalk on both sides. The overall proposed public right-of-way will be 53 feet in width.
The on-site topography is generally flat, with a slight hill in the westernmost portion of the site.
The site generally slopes from west to east, toward Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303, from
elevation 398 to 386. The project will be mass graded with cuts and fills balanced on site. The '
proposed development also includes further restoration of the Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303
buffer area.
The drainage facilities are required to meet the requirements of the 2009 King County Surface
Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM.
The drainage design shall meet, at a minimum, the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching
Forested Site Conditions and will provide Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment. The
drainage facility located in Tract B is a combination detention/wet pond. The wet pond will be
sized pursuant to the 2009 KCSWDM and the City's amendments to ensure that the Basic Water
Qualiry requirement is met. To provide Enhanced Basic Water Quality a paired water quality
treatment train will be used, with the first water quality facility being the previously described wet
pond. The second water quality facility will be a StormFllter Vault using CSF media located
downstream of the wet pond's flow control structure. The project will be discharging the drainage
from the pond to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303. Please refer to Section 4.0 for detailed
drainage calculations.
16834.015.doc
i
�--�
�
�
�
�
�
r O
� �
� �
�
.�
�..L �
K1NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ,
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT TIR WORKSHEET I�i
� � I
Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND
PROJECT ENGINEER DESCRIPTION
Project Owner The Ouadrant Cor�oration Project Name Plat of Conver���ood
Phone DDES Permit#
Address 14725 SE 36� Street, Suite 100 Location Township 23N
Bellevue. WA 98006 Range SE
Project Engineer Barry Talkington, P.E. Section 15
Company Bar�hausen Consultin� En�ineers, Inc. Site Address Renton,WA
Phone (42�) 251-6222
Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS
'- � Landuse Services ❑ DFW HPA ❑ Shoreline
Subdivision / Short Subd. / UPD ❑ COE 404 Management
� ❑ Building Services ❑ DOE Dam Safety � Structural
M/F /Commercial / SFR RockeryNault/
� Clearing and Grading ❑ FEMA Floodplain
❑ ESA Section 7
� Right-of-Way Use ❑ COE Wetlands
❑ Other ❑ Other
Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION
Technical Information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans)
Type of Drainage Review Full / Targeted / Type(circle one): Ful / Modified I
(circle): Large Site Small Site
Date (include revision Februarv 13, 2015 Date (include revision February 13,2015
dates): Agril 7.2015 dates): April 7. 2015
Date of Final: A ril 29 2015 Date of Final: A ril 29. 2015
Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS ,
Type (circle one): Standard / Complex / Preapplication / Experimental / Blanket
Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2)
Date of Approval:
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1!09
1 16834.016-FINL TIR Worksheet.doc
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
' Monitoring Required: Yes / No Describe:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN
Community Plan :
Special District Overlays:
Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River Basin
Stormwater Requirements: Flow Control Duration Standard Matchin�Forested Site Conditions
Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS
� River/Stream � Steep Slope
❑ Lake ❑ Erosion Hazard
❑ Wetlands ❑ Landslide Hazard
❑ Closed Depression ❑ Coal Mine Hazard
❑ Floodplain ❑ Seismic Hazard
❑ Other ❑ Habitat Protection
❑
Part 10 SOILS
Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential
i
AeC 6-15 Percent Hi�h
❑ High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) ❑ Sole Source Aquifer
❑ Other ❑ Seeps/Springs
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/09
2 16834.016-FINL TIR Worksheet.doc
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS
� REFERENCE LIMITATION /SITE CONSTRAINT
❑ Core 2—Offsite Analysis
❑ Sensitive/Critical Areas
❑ SEPA
❑ Other
❑
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Discharge Area)
' Threshold Discharge Area:
name or descri tion Dischar e to Ma lewood Creek Tributa 0303 near southeast corner of site.
Core Requirements (all 8 apply)
Dischar e at Natural Location Number of Natural Dischar e Locations: 1
Offsite Analysis Level: 1 / / 3 dated: February 13, 2015
Flow Control Level: 1 / / 3 or Exemption Number
(incl. facility summary sheet) Small Site BMPs
Conveyance System Spill containment located at: N/A
Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: TBD ,
Contact Phone: TBD '
After Hours Phone: TBD
Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Private / Publi '
If Private, Maintenance Lo Re uired: Yes / No
Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes / No
Liabilit
Water Quality Type: Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basic / Bog
(include facility summary sheet) or Exemption Na ',
Landsca e Mana ement Plan: Yes / N
Special Requirements (as applicable)
Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA/SDO/ MDP/BP/LMP/Shared Fac. / Non
Requirements Name:
Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / Non ,
100-year Base Blood Elevation (or range): �
Datum:
Flood Protection Facilities Describe: N/A
Source Control Describe landuse: N/A
(comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: N/A
2009 Surface Water Desien �4anual 1/1/09
y 3 16834.016-FINL TIR Vb'orksheet.doc
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Oil Control High-use Site: Yes / N
Treatment BMP:
Maintenance Agreement: Yes / N�
with whom?
Other Drainage Structures '
Describe:
Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION
� Clearing Limits � Stabilize Exposed Surfaces
� Cover Measures � Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
� Perimeter Protection � Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure
❑ Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities
� Sediment Retention � Flag Limits of SAO and open space
preservation areas
� Surface Water Control
❑ Other
❑ Dewatering Control
� Dust Control
� Flow Control
Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS Note: Include Facilit Summa and Sketch
Flow Control T e/Descri tion Water Quali T e/Descri tion
� Detention Pond ❑ Biofiltration ',
❑ tnfiltration � Wetpool Wetpond
❑ Regional Facility � Media Filtration StormFilter
❑ Shared Facility ❑ Oil Control
❑ Flow Control ❑ Spill Control
BMPs
❑ Flow Control BMPs
❑ Other
❑ Other
2009 Surface Water Design Manual l/1/09
4 16834.016-FINL TIR Worksheet.doc
�
0
-1--+
�
N U
� O
L �
� �
� -�-�
�..L V J
�.e�cn� a �
� � g Ne Sth St � �
�� � � S
0
� � ,� ; ae a�i
Windior ,� �
� Hills Park F`"'d �,an s� � N.4m S� � Ne arn s�
se�
3 � m Ne 3rd PI
,o� � Greenwood � P Ne�d si
< Memorial a �
m`� � � Park Heather ; � �,�
� Downs � � �6
� Park � �
n Ne Ind St � Ne 2nd St ,`.
�n� � '�(.� N�Ist Ct ►
�,� r��,, Ne 1 st� t
s > Ne lst St �ltt SI
� Mt Olivet � � Se tse n
Cemetery x � � 3�� Se 2nd St ,
�lnd G � � Se Ird St � � S°I"d� St
� � �3
'y ��Sr ���St � A ��� q
a� x ��4�t`�' SITE p i
'�,i9�o \�-�` —
' M+Pi Se StA SI <
�� ta. ��av�.fi�h x��ts�st �' %,
�,� � s� Maplewood 5e te�se � `
Park � �
� _ �
tM, , .. . 'f�'/Mth St �
h PI - .._.<��
�/
p����'Y� Maplewood
Golf Course
� '� I
i `
Ce�� $1 '� x �`y � ��nr ,�
v� ` a"•�
� � f •��` da�p y Ron Re�
�4� ��� , � a�i�rqd Park
�„f �#�w� �` raan w�r s� ,w
�'� � �. . '
� ,� u��►'Ss a '�=m.��� �iy �'�
un w � � "�'d�. � '� �.,+.
� �� � � �'�r
x � � �'�.�'• �'.� �,, �pk
� � � � �
� � ��s� r �" Tiffany
,9� ,� Se tSTthl' Park i� �'/�th5�
4
s
Se 21 st St y ``��� � Se I�h S� r' S�156th S�
Se 22nd% � S�1601h St � Se t60th St k/59�� S�159th%
Se 1601h St v
x � � Se I6tst St S h��YS�
se���d s� � � � r '� �Park e ,3�t. X' s ,� �roa
� �` �6j r
� S�16Ad 51 � � N g ^`�r � Se J6,� J 9 Se t62nd M
St ^ : Se 16kh k St
Sa 16�th St �F
c_,._ _ �A�.�
REFERENCE: Rand McNally(2014)
Scale: FOr: Job Number
Horizontal: N.T.S. VeRical: WA PLAT OF COPPERWOOD 16834
GHAV 1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� n► s� KENT,WA 98032
m y Z (425)251-6222 Tit/e:
� S � (425)251-8782 VICINITY MAP
1 =
�� �'U, �' CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,
<T f,P
�NC eNG�H� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE:04/16l14
P:116000s1168341exhibitlgraphics116834 vmap.cdr
I
„ �3 - IS ''"_ .
� i_� . �
� . a.i. .
� -.. ....� .
.e.. ... ,� � � �i-M ..+ , �'
� . tAlpt UNO W IDt D��NO S�� .. � _ 13 � 11 `'-..
.
- � 6 61 6� !0 ��5� ..S� � ST )�] �lnl• .••ldA
' F .• ��� • -�• ..:.. u eei�oz - . � !
- R : .. .��• _
� ��:: [„ h . . _,c ���:�� n:,y ' L..
� � x_. ^ •m
.:
� ' " ». .�.. . ,; c;?C . . �c �e n 10 ..
r�a}j'�`-_-�^ -. � r. '.. . - a. . iwj � f`'
- ��� r „ . 6 E 17QTH S � ��
e - ' - u..s� . . ..sP`:�']oCfiaYUW� _:�..
. ��'� ... iis.LTI ��
r „
.Y5 4 �'"p 's -
�`�.`fG• � LOit - '
�... 3 - � _�. . 7�U
" "' '' x'. 1 - � _,.:._ ' .
��' �..V� e , � ^��.
, 4 _ �. _ .. :� ��
- ;o' a ` a ME .
" � - 's � �,,, .� E TATES
'��" ' � ' 3,s"
,„. . n`l TMct• ' . .
�'� 3 �,: _ q� _ .
_ `��' � 7f.n.�. ... a �
, ' _ t - �
F :' _ o '
o. - ' °� s �.s.
�m� - '
_ --. N '� ....
... - -" � f$IJO$ '.. � �,,.-�
- +n _.. Kpvao0lt
• � � � �.
u i�x• 132?OS ��
_ rL6PelW6oa [pM��Ot� . orl ' _ .
lOt]
'_ T
.� a • . ..�. _. r:.s� .._ ,..e, !�°' ' .. -.._
> "� ., . • . aF=� `
.c ..... ..... ... �
:r s, SITE ,�.z , _
. S e P '. - T1UCT 1 .... _ . � _
� _.. `. 911� a:�f
_ t9 ilF]K �...• �.x a�ii�vx.st��.�ii..�[.i�
a ... ,~] b �� IOfI
b ' r1UCT] - q�� 9
- I�.` 1� �.u.er�tri.aiii ��. �f "� '
%S a ��.:s � f� 157J03 . .. v.....�..0 ..�.o.s.s �..v..w��..rv.n,
���e� y, LDft
',,�aE�•i ,-,o o .. rmrw� wme�m�
.t��, �. ''j•u• f "•' '�.
._ • �.
.. nuer� .. �.
w
,s rt �_ ,
o�.�, "
- 157J05 �•��
_ `os..
_ - - 9195 K .: �u.ao 916
.. .<... ", � - ' rne�. ..�,�... '� w . � $ s a.niwnrar �� " ..
� '" �R f .�0.� � l t _ ' � Nibu.i �� L, 'i�.� ' ' ..
RE T _ .� = . - .,69�
� �.r. _ ��.. SRI30
r � _ r - : n mq ' , ..
- . �:� B� +� E �r
' = 91GJ 1 l aN�i � .. :
. "�. �,:. '. . ,,. .::; ' . E� _�,:_ ;:�" -
c:30 � �.N i.>{ y t .
.._... -w.�w+n H».n , ;,.. ,^� r ' .
y � , , , st2ao`.�� a '' ' : ��,_ , {' _.. `Y � _- .. „
REFERENCE: King County Department of Assessments(Dec. 2011)
S�,e: For: Job Number
Horizontal: N.T.S. Verticaf: N/A PLAT OF COPPERWOOD 16834
�Ha� 1g21572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� ��► s� KENT,WA 98032
m 'y Z (425)251-6222 Tit/e:
o � i. (425)251-8782 ASSESSOR MAP
Z�� •` CIVIL ENGINEERING,IAND PLANNING,
�r� ��� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE:04/16/14
^'a�na�N
P:V6000s1168341exhibitlgraphics116834 amap.cdr
■ �i
Figure 3
Drainage Basins,
Subbasins, and Site
Characteristics
�
� �� �
,
. __.—__��_�,:,�_
�_
. �
� ' Northern
r` . : �y
r �i✓ /
_ � i:�: ; - Tributaries
' ' Subarea
. �
--� . _ � �
1 1'.'ac'e..3t! -
r .. z� .�,�� ��_o�:r� ��,
: �, ,_ __ � ,4 .�'j . � ;--- Figure 3-t
� -ti,- - , ..� ..
�.� f. - -- Mainstem :�• •`^ ' • .
.
___ Suborea : � , �� cn��9 r+a� ; :� ` `�`
� --� '--�' � `� �''°'" � ���`�'Y' � Subarea Boundaries
- RENTON ...:• - ' ��,o , , • �
� ���`�� , � �` `., , ;
. j }` I ����r� \. �����• ��, l.. J � � ..
;a1 �'� � �• `• •
; j� , � 1 � \ . • �, i ♦
— — ;'� ' �. '�} 1�� �
. _(� ' �- __T� � ,�� ; Cedar River Basin Planning Area
. _ ,:+ ,,,, �,' , ` � _.,
. .:: �_ . -� .-:, .� : - . , '`�-�.
.' :J'f.�V:��� I , 'v r I I'� ' . •.:. .,.. � . �.' � � .
— • , ��r- :.c'ra-. ����� if `� �;��� ��' � Surunec}:e� � .
' ' `> � •�..Jl 3_ =�kbasm�� �
I:� _ ,• �c ; " . . • _ • �� • �, :.r.f��H:i;
>j � � ! i ��-��..�` s����� �� •�:xt�n;i
? � i , �' � �;Mainstem ; Northem
; � � �:�u: , �� �f.�:,., � ,� 'Subarea '.�
� ,".,-,.,t�;�� ; � �s,;a�:�` � s � . Tributaries
� � • Subarea
--� .. �� , � � Peterso�`--• •
_ ` ��__,� Southem ' ..i- ( ; .:. Creek �� ��;
i � Tributaries \ � Subar .
�-----�- , �.... • ��_'
■ —'J .SUEIG�CO '\ t � � � j � ���� ,'����lccr.t�L^Iv !_4�
I , ' i' �� :4 t , _ �► Stkbas n - •
' i �r�I •• .. j����� �f� + ' L4i �� ,
� � r:�, ♦ = • -�h � �� �
� '_.'-J'= ' __ - � • :� f � , ��.• ♦ �i �
; �r—�. � �
. - r �
- .,:�>o� `; ; _ . 4
< -- � _.�, . �...•
. �
.
� 3 _ ��` ' `:��,��i - _ � � �.
�' � ! !
J ` . ► � � � � -� � r .
• . -. —
' •. - "`� �� Taylor Creek �- ...r� Srreom � '
: _ '•.� �; ;;, Subarea = _,,� - � �r lake/River
�� , _ .. ♦ ___- . "��,
` ��� ���� � ` .1• Basin Plon Boundory
, ''� �� \',�'�� � •�• Subarco Boundary �
. �� ♦ � �r�� VVdshlakp 'i } •r � '�.
� . �� ^. .��` r • � f fU�O_k1 \ _' .. '�.
; r�.` �����.� � S�66osin Bo�ndory
• N ._ ' `-�bos�^ ti
J ; 'i' �•�-' ; yYVlad�le Tributarie3$ubareo ""�:"' �_=7 Incorporated Areo(as oF 6/981 ,
� � �"�.�� -� j �" � � Urban Growth Area Boundary . I
� e l�� ,,'••t ;-;s�+" .; k (as of 6/98J !I
i ' " • : �� � �.
� G � � .�������� I
i►
� i ' " , � Mainstem
' ` Suborea
• II
-- . •....� .� .
. � � , '��. : . .-'"�. :
:�:�: = � - .� . . . .
_ � • : �'•-= � �I
. . ,
� MAPLE �` �'��� � ' I
� VALtEY ••� � � �
' ` �' � •• • ` R«k Creek
� ; I ----------, ••----' ,
k �_S..�f
Subarea
I KENT �f o
; ---��' -- — -_-- I . . � . i
. { e�,, ( ;
� , �r,5�,; � � �
.n, i i
'�', • t
S�y' _ r
� . _'_-L'---'—r-� � .
1 e + 1
1`
\ I t
� � a 0 � 2��f
+ f �
�'�'�'�'�'_'�' X '
�I � 8
� _ I '1
_ ._ / r:i.;: I . F �e��.,,,± M�p produced by:
_ -. ._ ,� ! z�g YsnalCommunicationiWSUn(t,
, ------ O �,�; Pubt&Outreach5ectkn
O 9Nitedn�/�o�41N�7-1 fi
. . •\ ' � � ����V
� :
`\ � '
�� � -
O ' 1 : � o �--- — -
�-�d I�� i ; �-- --
a � � a
N 1 :- � . _
� . . � _,.�
.. , : o
. ....
.... � , S
I g �
i �
, ,, , �
I I $
/ i
E-- _ � I �
,� : � -.
� .
___ ___.�_�______ �,:��__�
� w �
.� �, .
�� .
...
w :
�
_;
,� 'i�� , ... I
,_, ' � �
. ...
,.. .. ...:..:
, ...:.,..
,:�.. .... .:.:
.::...: ::.. ::
...:.;,
_
.... .... . . ..
;..:.�
:. ..:.... . .:. .
:., .
. .
.
>: ..
.
.... :,.:. ..
...:: :...: :.:.....: ::.:.
.;.
; ..
� . ,..�..., . :. .:.,
j � .. , .. .
..: . ...
_. �..
� ., �`.
..... :
, � � �
•�-� ,; (�I __ _
rn � rn
� o � .. � .� �
:;. :
._
rn .:: : . , w �
�� .... � � � � �
�rn ,. � �� � � o
�r � _ � O m
8� �� � � � b �
nrn � � �� � m
� _ � � � oo
�`, � � � � D
� I �
;---- U� Z
_ --_ rn
� �
� � i i D . _ �
, � , (n � � � � � D
::; � ,
� � �
� � � ��� � " z � � �j �
' ' _ I �
� � �
� �
1
` � �
4 i
�i, 1 �� ����
_____I /' ' � �
�
_--_ �
__J _ __
. ' i ►I �.
.
� r . _ , i � ' � �
� ..... b�` . / ���.: . " .
: �. �1. ' ' I � ' • :' :
N ..:� ......� I I I ��` .
, ...... 1, � A4 / r y.�ti 1 .: '.-"
. . " ^ / � N ��• . I I
: ♦,,� ;: /� l l � i ,
� ♦ � � ,
�� � ��
�, � : I ; �
� --_
� � +
_ . -
_ . .,. � ;
.
.
_ . .
I Ij
.... '�... �'--.. ": ,.; �''�..... J
�. -. ,......._ .............. �!� .
' I
t..,. ���. � — — — — —
�:...... "..... _ .
. ... ...::.
,:
... �........ � ... ......: . . .
��.. .......... .... . ......_�:, �L',
... ............ ,. ,.�..,.
.....:�
_ _ _ .. _ ....: ... :�
� �� " - - - ...---�-......... ', . ` i
� . _.--,-.�.�.
--- _.......... ._
- , _ _.._ T 143R�E SE �-__,�_ W-- _ �
� _ , ,,, I
_.
� � � , _ , , ____
� � � ; � � , ,
i i , ` I_ i i i' ;
i i i ....... i i � I
I i i i i r i �
I .. � � � � ; I ��. i . I , . .
I , � I I : I I I � , �
I I I i I I I
I I' �
No. Date By CkC. /�ppr. Revte�on
Job NumMr
G►'�A(� De�i9neE Scole: FO(� ��
Q� , 31 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH
16834 mP t�`Z KENT WA 98032 o.m.� „a;,�,�o, G?UADRANT HOMES
(425) 251-6222 ,._,�. PREDEVELOPED BASIN MAP
�„.., � _ � (425) 251-8782 FAX �".°'�°— 14725 SE 36TH ST. SUITE 200 FOR
_ � = roP�°°•' °•"'°°' BELLEVUE, WA 98006
sc�l . �Qy� CML ENGINEERING, UND PLANNING, N�� COPPERWOOD
1 I 1 �NG ENG�N� SURVEYINC, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES oate ..__ .
s
DEVELOPED BASIN AREA MAP �
FOR �
�-- co��E�u�oo� �
r��, �rv oF�nnnn/a,��sEi/a oF sEc�s �
o �o so ,eo 1V4P.23 Pl,F�5 EAST,W.M A
G7'Y OF Fi9�ITOP� I��G COUVTY, STATE OF WAS{-�dG70N BYPASS BASI N � o
� � � i I 1 � ; I AREA-0.09 AC IMPERVIOUS m A; �
I � � � � � I � co=, a
! � � I � ° p
� � U,.. �
..) d ' �
� '•.:. ':_.._., �
; .... ;.h.�-- a� _ ,
o � •.. -
• ' \�� `��n' �'���'�$��"�i�e��`1, - -- —
.., � -•,. . ��:�. T,- -- ---- ���— — — �
--- :� -- � � .-- :, -=�--- _ -- ----- ----, . -_ --_.. _.__ ��� . . . _ _
: -----_ -----__ .-� g ,� '- ,4,r-r- . -_.<z - � i a
_
.t..,
------- ---- �
. . .
..
:. : . � _ _ _,�._ _ _ �����3�TW�-�— -
. -- --- _ _ ---- --- _.____- — ..
. .�� n ,-.- >. -- � -- . ---�_.__._ _ - :=��.��L_::�-��n___.=:_._�� ._
�---------. � n - -
---- . �.. ...,�
r
----� - s
.. _ -----._
. ... .....
.
.... _ _ _ :
, — _ ^.�.."._ :� .. , _ _ _
. �. -
_ �.. . � - _ _ - - - --
...
.
_
.. . '
_
. ..�
.
, _ _. . .:... . _ - - - �-
__ � - .
, .... . : ---- . : ---- ---- ,--- __ -—------
. .z
- �; -------
�, �---------------- - � � ; ... ,_
. . '�
�
,,, _ > s
I� r- � � �- — ...t- ' z �
, __ ; :
� =. �� .
:�,.
_ : ' ,
:. . . j —
- � ` 1 � � '; 27 �;-, `28 : � _ .j+ . j `'y — _ o
�
... ` �
_
` .
9 —
,� . , . . � i�l: � ��
, � �� -. .• � 45 � � ... ' �.� [ s� � ,;� ! ; � c�
_ , �� ,� � I� . .
i � � � � �` - � •� � il� I= �.. � ' i � � o
2 ' 26 '��I � , I P .� I���. � °� ; ; � � rn
', � ' ;I
� 1 {, 29 :, � ; I: . , i � C!}
��. • . ��'`�:.. ��
,, �
�,: �, . � � �: :�ll�� � j I � ' = C~!3 ?i
. " : •
' .:. � ; '� :3�a� i... . 'i�- Q� :;�..�� � �i. -
Y .. :� i
, i
a : � �s �:� ; � ' �� � ' ` ------------ �
/ � .� 'i � ,
, ; � � � �;� a �
r , , G : , i .::��: � � � � ( ; ;I o � �u
,
� .�, � , `' �::... .., �, ��:.� �� - �
.� ��.� � � � � � �
� 4 ^ � � . . � 31 \ . : _ � m
...2.4.. _ � �� I ` � cV
. .....
,-
. . �..:
� �
� ;
� ,. , � , �; :... ;; � - 42 __..... � \�\�� � �I ' ' � �
- , , , .
�.. _ _...... . i . - - �'::\ � _
. �
....
.
:
r : : _ ,_ :-.._: : i ., • �; �\ - ---------
c ..... �.
�'• � . '-' �
; 5 �... ' . _ � �\�,.:�. � '
� � � � g �
.. . ' . ,
- ; � �': . - �
.. _ . : ::
��.
, . . . .
, . _..._. '. '` . ..._ ..
. :: . � .
,` � �.:��
Q "�b ' �t .... _ 1 �\ ��
� . � �
. ..... , .
. ��, : . , - .- � ; -�
: �
..
,:
� � : . . ' �
,��.... .. :� �' : , � ; ..��, ��
"
�•.
G : .. , _ _ _. ; :. : ; _ BASIN nn
�
G ,�„ :...s �.. , �. : 22 , A <� - . -� \�\�� ��
' �1� - � .... : :.
4....�?
. _
. ? �`t�4� � � . l ...JqE � �..t � \ ��' � �I�I, -�_'_�_-_
: .� ' :'� � r ... __... �
'
' �... ' � ..,- . .... . ... ;"�" . . �: ,
W
� � � � � � \ \� �
� .��i , : — .,.... . . \� �
-�.� •�.L�1 I' � • �.3e$..-� ' \ �� � - I �
: 1� ' .
�. ,,, 7 . �_' ``21 f-�*,--� _ � �.
< ��,� . ; . ;_ � ��
.y,, . .. _ � ' : � �' � t `�:�� s
_. i .... .' : ' S ; _ ' .. w�, - € g C <
�
.' .
�{'� ...
...
� � � 1 - -
� \
_.... .
,, �*
V �i x •t �: : i � � � 1\ I �I'__ � � z
< �i: 8 - ,� ` r": I ; ,37 � ,'\ . �� L�j+; -------- � �
_- t. .. .
f . .' ' ." '__�0 . .. `�4 !,
r .. . 1 �..: � � �y �
Z , i �� - . ��.,�5 -. i ��. " � � �' ��T` �' I I I
.� �
I � � � , ��
� � ._ _ � __ � ''..'{� -f�i�j} _��;ti�\``� - � \\ � `f°,� i g
� 9 - . '
i . .
i + ' :.- �:'�� .
� , �
._. ...__._ 1 ..... _� :�.. $ :. ,.,
�� r'j
: �........_ - . 19 36 ' :
,, , �.,�::�
L ,,, , ,,;`� , , � ��\ :
� t ` 1 { ` ,:,,\ , 1 \�� � �
.. : ' . ` l `It`L ` a\```` \\ -...��"� E. I.I..
i � � 8
:: � ; . ��;�,�,, ��.�, , � ---------
:;,� � ,
� , . �, i � � �
- �, � . , �'", - --- --- --- r i��}�i `�::�:.`\ � � � 'I i � z�
, �.. .. . � . �_�-_..� . � 1: i�i i ��\�� � ` �'.I -
`. r `
��....p� .., �. �.. 'i �t �` � ' ,ir� i . I ;,i �1 l. � `����i`�` ;`�� �j- �''I � J
... . .� .
'�. .' � ;. • .. - ... . .,_.:
i ,._ :�'' �� ,. �
'__ ' - i .,. . .. . �... 11 � � y �
�� <
V � � .. 1��1 . �il.-l� I� '/� �1� ��� � � ��
� � i i ' � � �. __ ""_ ���! �� 1� 11I
i, ++.��
; .��: � M �.:�_ ' ,;.�. � . . .. �� I ��������� --- --- ���i� ii : ��N� �z
. 1,
, .. . I �
`---- � �- ' , . .....:�. ..'_ ..: � I .�•�. � �� � -` ---'_ 'r� i i�t '� ; N r� ci
T ` � f � I .' � ~� � � � ---_- �� . .�;;� 1� ------------ o°°`° °° Z�
__-_; , .,,:
_ � �
�._:- �� ,� ,,;, _. �, : � , ; -
i r I •�» 1 f i 1 �, i. `ti�ir../ �• _'�� +� . Zrn 1 t ,5
�� I �-� 1 I i �ir� -_ iivi�i� t . �'X�� �' � � ^3c`�vN Z�z
..I f .'f, t d��ii". i 1 if</i � -j' � i : �n �j
, fl ..::.. 12 � .13� . 14 15 16 17 18 'i ; .j;; - }�I�/ ��yj� I � �NN
, ., .,. . ..... ; _ -- L.
� + --- �; �� ; �
� �' .' � ii� ti'� � { 1 /:� 'I ^ aa ��
� Y - I:. � i<:�;i�` tN���� i F�:� Y�/ �c� 1 � / �t.�� uw
+ � --�_� ' ����`� -- - ':ii � �c.: �r�f.jX . ��J.I
� I `.i �. `,,,--=__ � �� ,�,�� 1;, ? � N ��ou,,
�� ' : . . � --- -_ '
.
..
'�-�:_ — — :_ - .' . � v c���`
.
��
— �� . — z i`•�.. _ '' :- -- -- ��'.�`` '�� . J�� _
,,
,
_ _ ,
: ..-_....�1 . . _ . . ' S:k�� �°r� `�� �''s Sb�W
. ,. , , . _ . . ; .
: �
. �._
��S� �.`Y
: - ' ......... :. . . .
IMPERViOUS AREAS� _ : ' ,. :• „ . ..,: x ::r ------ � �
. .. . :
..... .. ....... . .; _
' ROADS AND SIDEWALKS� 1.63 AC T '; b �
�•, �,.. .....�' J
ROOFS, DRNEWAYS AND PATI�S� 4.24 AC ' �-�.' �t��':��". be °`°`'�
� �......,.
� PERVIOUS AREAS- I E r��
GRASS 3.94 AC � � � r I
�
� �
� �
L �
�
.� •Q
�.�..� V,
�
� � � -,;_,T.�
. � „; i
� - � H. :. -
< ��
, . �, �
->
_ ��,�.,q���1 �;� 'a �
r,��`- •�'-a ��
_ � . r.
� � 1 �Ar' ��
� �Y
.�
� .� `�. }� � _w r� a ��'� £
� 4 {
_ y�� � �--�
+� , � ° � P
.<: ,
�
I y� �� � �� �c, ��� � �._ `� '.
.._ _
I �� � ,c «� � � `�� `, �..a ` � ir -�..si
r .
, �� � � �"���. � � !�e
: �
. . �
.
� , . .. .' . J�� F
�� :.x � :t ..
� � � �� �
"_' '_r � . :; � � .•� "
�_ i , r ' .
�;I[; t
R �� ��I:' IY, . 1 � 1 ����
� .
'r ... r ', �.
.. ,. ..�v - . . .>' ,
�
i �6� ��� �� � .. .
■` ..��,''"�. } ;� � �'� _�
SITE � �
� :
f +3-.
ci �.�^"
, . . ,. . ... �.._.
-.A,.......g :r __'_
_ � ..-
-,_.
_ . „ .
� # . �
`\ �
i� �`Y� f '`��'�
� �: _
., �� ' . v ..: ��
.. i
� _ . �' � '� . -. � �• ' '
� ' �r� E '
� �1
� gi��k
.. y ��. I � -��..
' �
~ ���3 t v� � � �:'.i� .� .
1 � � �
. ..r � <`: ._ . • � "
.5. >
. rM.. �. � ��.: -
t '
� ` � �
t.' "
R_ „
�
��:" ,� �k �t�
�"`� �� �` :�
� _
�
.
` i,
� . �
�
� ..;� � .��.
i� �
� ` ;
.a�� .fii � ` i
� 1
� .�� � �
-'�-
.:�, <� �� �� � ���
--� .
� .
.� -. : �� ` : .�' .. _ :.'- . r < �
KEFEiZENGE: USUA, Natural i�esources Conservation Service
LEGEND:
AgC =Aldenrvood graveily sandy loam,6-15%slopes
Sca/e: FO/': Job Number I
Horizontal: N.T.S. Vertical: N/A PLAT OF COPPERWOOD
�GHA vs 16834
1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� n► � KENT,WA 98032
47 y Z (425)251-6222 Tlfl@:
° ° " �425�25� 8�82 SOIL SURVEY MAP
' °y r
�����,, dp�' CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,
NQ eNG�p6 SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE:04/16114
P:116000s1168341exhibitlgraphics116834 soil.cdr
�
�
� �
� Q
� �
.� W
� �
� _ _ _ `� ! ,
� � SG,�TycaS�
�3?!yD
STREET
Q
h
SOUTHEAST 136TH STREET
oz, � W ZONE X
I— z � w
w O E
� � 15 =
� 9 �
� � z �i N
� Y <^
U ,�
0
�
� � SITE
. f
� �
SOU?HEAST
� CCRPORATE LIMIl'S
`�� ;?
_ ; /
c
�
` CITY OF RENTON � sF �aorH g <
530088 S` "` _
�-- � W STREFT a -
< _ _
z -
,4',,S? j' S 7 v r�
�� • � SE 140TH � �
_.� � a "' P�_ACE �
aJ ` _ �
.rL c � � ?
`�; ',c2`.D ry O � � �
�-� ^O� (p / �
��P�� a �p
'�� ..1 S� 142'`� w
pJ � �- .'�� ' �n
`' � Q Z PLACF u' w
, SO ; a � Q x � J
�Th��� � � �9is Q g d
ST �
a LEGEND
� � c�rfiER ��F.�t
�c �, �
KING COUNTY F a zoNe x ,. , ,.� , �, .�_.., .�,-.,.,
...�.. ,
�---�-— � 144TH STREET ' i' �
CITY OF RENTON
REFERENCE: Federal Emergency Management Agency(Portion of Map 53033C0982 F, May 1995)
Sca/e: FO/': Job Number
Horrzontal: N.T.S. Vertical: N/A PLAT OF COPPERWOOD
�GHAV� 16834
1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� t►►� � KENT,WA 98032
m � Z (425)251-6222 Tif/e:
0 3 i (425)251-8782 FEMA MAP
y�� �' CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,
�r�NQ tN6�N��p SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE:04/16/14
P:I160GOs1168341exhibitlgraphicsll6834 fema.cdr
Figure 6
Sensitive Areas Map
,�
�
'�"' �� ��l�f`,�i���°'s.. g. ��_.� � .�
�'�, ' � � a
� � '�'`�B�`� �--� �- , �. .�:�
� ���y ' s°� • r" ,� .� �i
Ea��� ,� ���� ' , �r�� " � '�---�--�-L ►�
� �
� ,� .+►�� �� -: .�� � �� .„",
' •�.'!E"/ � � � ' .+� r
�� ;�� � � �� �� .�� �E' � �
� �e � � ( �� Y�� �i �
_ ��»} Y �� !
r,_,.! �' �� '
�
� a� r� �+� . ����..�° � r
_._.:�� � �*� � _ _ � ��.� .----� �����,� � �
�, - �- m��o ���� -- -— - .
. �,. . • �-�---, �s,�,aitil, _
• �� ���.= � - , Y,� � ��� _�,:
1 �� �� � ; � ��� �_
� �,-,�— � �, , �� �T � ��`
, � �..� � �� � _ ��
-- � � �''�'� - *;� ' �� ��
�.�� �y. � � , �. �� !� .
� '` � '�+a � � �
�. � -s ,� _�.� `� -.�.�' �
� �� � .� � �
, �va�, . �.
� r .�. �
- � �,-'"� .� � �� , �
a . - : ';� 5� �
� ' � E �? � � �
� ��J �� •� � �': I+ j ' �
- ! � r�� �. I
�! - ' x� �'
Mt ��— '� � � �
. ,t=-. — ° F- -�-�--�-
.$
' •-° i►` '�` � �"� =� �c.�` `�f
< ,..— ,�, .
�
.. - _ . , _ :
� �j - � : K� �
������ ������ ��� - . �
� �� A � �� �'; 3 ��
��� t � � ..;�� -�. ►
� � . �
r�� �� _: _.
,
:
� . r�. :�
��
� ;
.��� �._� � '�����k' �,{€ Y -- ��
, Lege��d
City and County Boundary � Shoreline Residential
Other � urban Conservancy
�:� CtydReMon � Jurisdictions
Parcels
Slope City of Renton
>>s+c a<-zsx
>zsx a�ox���
■ >40%3 a90%(Proteded)
� '°0'� �'°'°�
REFERENCE:www.rentonweb.org(2014)
Scale: FO/': Job Number
Honzontal: N.T.S. Verfical: N/A PLAT OF COPPERWOOD 16834
GHAV 1821572NDAVENUESOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON
� n► S� KENT,WA 98032
m , Z (425)251-6222 Tifle:
� 3 � (425)251-8782 SENSITIVE AREAS
:.` �II U� ,_
�r �p CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING, MAP
�N�eNc�N� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES DATE:04/16/14
P:I16000sI168341exhibitlgraphics116834 amap.cdr
2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
2.1 Analysis of the Core Requirements
Core Requirement No. 1: Discharge at fhe Natural Location.
Response: The runoff from the existing site leaves near the southeast corner via an
on-site creek (Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303). The proposed detention pond will
discharge into the creek, maintaining the natural discharge location for the site.
Core Requirement No. 2: Off-Site Analysis.
Response: An Off-Site Analysis has been performed pursuant to the 2009 KCSWDM
and 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. Please refer to Section 3.0 for
further detail.
Core Requiremenf No. 3: Flow Control.
Response: Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Site Conditions is
required. Flow control requirements will be met by a detention pond, designed pursuant
to the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. See
Section 4.0 for more information.
Core Requirement No. 4: Conveyance System.
Response: The conveyance system has been designed pursuant to the 2009 KCSWDM
and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. Conveyance and backwater
calculations are provided in Section 5 of this report.
Core Requirement No. 5: Erosion and Sediment Control.
Response: Temporary erosion control measures are provided in the final engineering
plans.
Core Requirement No. 6: Maintenance and Operations.
Response: Please refer to Section 10.0 for the Maintenance and Operations guidelines
associated with the proposed storm improvements.
Core Requirement No. 7: Financial Guarantees and Liability.
Response: The project will provide a Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet to
establish a bond amount for drainage facility restoration and site stabilization financial
guarantee prior to construction.
Core Requirement No. 8: Water Quality.
Response: Enhanced Basic water quality is required for this project. This requirement is
satisfied by utilizing a two facility treatment train consisting of a wetpond followed by a
StormFilter vault. Please refer to the calculations within Section 4.0 of this report.
2.2 Analysis of the Special Requirements
Special Requirement No. 1: Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements.
16834.015.doc
Response: The proposed project is located in the Lower Cedar River Basin Area. A
report was prepared by King County (See portions in Appendix A)which requires Level 2
Flow Control (Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Site Conditions per the
2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM) and Basic Water Quality for the
project.
Special Requirement No. 2: Flood Hazard Area Delineation.
Response: As indicated by the FEMA Map included in this report, the proposed site
does not lie within a floodplain or floodway of a stream, so this special requirement does
not apply.
Special Requirement No. 3: Flood Protection Facilifres.
Response: This project does not rely on an existing flood protection facility or propose to
modify or construct a new flood protection facility, so this special requirement does not
apply.
Special Requirement No. 4: Source Control.
Response: The project does not require a commercial building or commercial site
development permit, so this special requirement does not apply.
Special Requiremenf No. 5: Oil Confrol. I
Response: This site is not classified as a High Use Site given the criteria in the 2009
KCSWDM, so this special requirement does not apply and no special control treatment is
necessary.
Special Requirement No. 6: Aquifer Protection Area
Response: The project site is not located within an Aquifer Protection Area and,
therefore, this special requirement does not apply.
2.3 Hearing Examiner Conditions
The proposed preliminary plat, street improvement modifications and critical areas
exemption are approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with mitigation measures issued as part of the Mitigafed
Determination of Non-Significance for the proposal.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
2. All proposed street names shall be approved by fhe City.
Response: Street names will be designated and approved by the City.
3. Al!!ot comers at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, except a!leys, shal/
have minimum radius of�fteen feet(15).
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings. I
16834.015.doc
4. Side sewer lines sha!!be installed eight feet (8) into each lot if sanitary sewer mains
are available, or provided with the subdivision development.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
5. A!! utilities designed to serve the subdivision shall be placed underground. Any
utilities installed in the parking strip sha!! be placed in such a manner and depth to
permit fhe planting of trees. Those utilities to be located beneath paved surfaces
shal! be insfalled, including all service connections, as approved by the Department
of Public Works. Such installation shall be completed and approved prior to the
application of any surface material. Easements may be requrred for the maintenance
and operation of utilities as specified by the Department of Public Works.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
6. Any cable TV conduifs shal! be undergrounded at the same time as other basic
utilities are installed to serve each lot. Conduit for service connections shall be laid to
each lot line by Applicant as to obviate the necessity for disturbing the streef area,
including sidewalks, or alley improvements when such service connections are
extended to serve any building. The cost of trenching, conduit, pedestals and/or
vaults and laterals as wel! as easemenfs therefore required to bring service to the
development shall be borne by the developer and/or land owner. The applicant shall
be responsible only for conduit to serve his development. Conduit ends shall be
elbowed fo final ground elevation and capped. The cable N company shal!provide
maps and specifications to the applicant and shall inspect the conduit and certify to
the Crfy that rt is properly installed.
Response: The condition is noted and will be applied.
7. The applicant shall be required to record the Copperwood lot line adjustment
(LUA14-000730)prior to Fina!Plat Recording.
Response: The Copperwood Lot Line Adjustment will be recorded prior to Final Plat
Recording.
8. Additional trees shaU be planted within the provided 25-foot open space tract along
the western border of the site, specifically the planting of additional trees to replace
removed trees within the tract that have been considered dead, diseased or
dangerous (Exhibit 13J. Additionally, the applicant sha!! be required to plant fwo
evergreen frees, per lot, along the southem perimeter of the site. These shal! be
placed into an easement identifying the requirement for retention of the trees in
perpetuity, if removed such trees shall be replaced at a 1:9 ratio. Such landscaping
or landscape plus fencing shall be, at a minimum, 6-feet high at maturity and at least
50 percent sight-obscuring. Existing healthy mature trees whrch are located within
the 25-foot wide open space tract shall 6e maintained and protected during ;
construction unless determined by an Arborist that such tree is dead, diseased, or
dangerous. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
16834.015.doc
9. Open space tracts shall be shown and recorded on the face of the plat to be
preserved in perpetuity.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Final Plat.
10. A!! structures proposed for remova! or relocation shall be demolished and/or
relocated and all inspections complete prior to Final Plat approval.
Response: The condition is noted and will be completed prior to Final Plat approval.
11. The applicant sha!! be required to submit a revised landscape plan, depicting a 10-
foot wide on-sife landscape strip for a!!lots. The fina! detailed landscape plan shal! I,
be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to ',
construction permit approval. Such landscaping shall include a mixture of trees, ,
shrubs, and groundcover as approved by the Department of Community and
Economic Development. '
Response: A revised landscape plan depicting the require 10-foot-wide buffer will
be submitted and approved before prior to construction permit approval.
12. The applicant sha!! eliminate access directly from S.E. 2nd Place for proposed Lot
46. As an alterrtatrve the applicant may provide shared access to tot 46 via the
internal looped road. The revised plat plan sha!!be submitted to, and approved by,
the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval. Should
the revised plat plan result in an additional access easement/righf-of-way dedication
the applicant shall be required to submit a revised density worksheet wifh the revised
plat plan demonstrating compliance with the density requirements of the R-4 zone.
Response: Lot 46 will be provided access to proposed Road C via a 16-foot-wide
shared driveway easement on Lot 47. All appropriate changes will be reflected on
the revised plat plan.
13. The applicanf shal! submit a Fina! Stream Mrtigation Plan for impacts (tight-lining of
drainage system, trail, and buffer averaging) to the critica! area buffer. The Final
Mitigation Plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Plannrng Project
Manager prior to utility construction permit approval. The applicant shall a/so
establish a IVative Growth Protection Easement over that part of the site
encompassing the stream and buffer area and place fencing and signage along the
outer buffer edge which would include the buffer edge along the wesf side of 143rd
Ave S.E.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Final report and
plan prepared by Soundview Consultants.
14. The applicant shalJ revise the S.E. 2nd Place cross section to transition to the code
required street standard (landscaping in befween the sidewalk and the curb) at the
eastern boundary of the Maplewood Creek buffer. The revised street cross secfion
shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior
to construction permit approval.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
15. The applicant shall be required to place a split rail fence along the eastern boundary
of the critical area/open space tract adjacent to the modified 143rd Avenue S.E.
16834.015.doc
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the appro�al of the Final report and
plan prepared by Soundview Consultants.
16. The applicant shal! be required to submit a Final Mifigation Plan demonstrating
compliance with the drscharge meefs the requirements of the Storm and Surface
Water Drainage Regulafions (RMC 4-6-030); wil! not result in significant adverse
changes in the water temperature or chemica! characteristics of the stream; and
there is no increase in the existing rate of flow (RMC 4-3-050C.5.d.i). The Fina! I
Mitigation Plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project ',
Manager prior fo construction permit approval.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Construction Plans
and this Technical Information Report.
17. The applicant shal!submit a revised plat plan depicting fhe eliminafion of the lof (Lot
47) within the subdivision. The applicant may submit an alternative plan which
provides access to Lot 47 according fo RMC 4-6-060, Street Sfandards. Should the
revised plat p/an result in an additional access easemenf/right-of-way dedication fhe
applicant shal! be required to submit a revised density worksheet demonstrating
compliance wifh fhe density requirements of the R-4 zone. The revised plat plan, and
density worksheet if needed, shal! be submitted to and approved by the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
18. The applicant shall provide a designated crosswalk, across S.E. 2nd Place, to
connect to the exisfing sidewalk on the north side of street. Alternatively the
applicant may designated walking path, on fhe south side of S.E. 2nd Place, east of
the subject property to an existing S.E. 2nd place crosswalk, in order to provide a
safe route to school/designated school bus stops. A safe route to school/designated
schoo! bus stops plan shall submitted to, and approved by the Current Planning
Project Manager, prror to construction permit approval.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
19. The applicant shal! be required to create a homeowners' association and
maintenance agreement(s) for the shared utilities, stormwater facilifies, and
maintenance and responsibilities for all shared improvements of this development. A
draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to Current Planning Project Manager for
review and approva!by the City Attorney and Property Services secfion prior to the
recording of the fina!plat.
Response: Acknowledged as a final plat item.
20. The signage required for the split rail fence along 143rd Ave S. sha!! provide that
dumping into the ravine is prohibfted.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Final report and
plan prepared by Soundview Consultants.
21. The proposal shal! be subject fo the mrtigation measures recommended in the
1 D/13/14 memo to the Examiner, Ex. 27. The staff recommends the following
conditions of approval. ,
16834.015.doc �I
21.1 Hand remove grass and other debris dumped on the bank fhat continues to
saturate the hillside that prevents natura! vegetated to grow on the bank
(immediately adjacent to 13652 and 13660 143rd Avenue S.E.) and plant
nafive vegetation along fhe bank. The proposed planting plan shall be included
in the Fina! Mitigation to be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Final report
and plan prepared by Soundview Consultants.
21.2 The applicant shall grind and overlay from the centerline of the existing asphalt
to the edge of road that fronts the project on 143rd Avenue S.E.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
2.4 SEPA Conditions
1. A!!earthwork performed, implemented by the applicanf, shal! be consistent with the
recommendations of the geotechnica! report, prepared by Terra Associates, lnc.,
dated February 10, 2015
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
2. The applicant shall provide a 50-foot horizonta!setback distance from the maximum
stored water elevation in the pond to the crest of the ravine slope. As an alternative
fo a setback the applicant may choose to line the pond with a flexible membrane liner
to prevent seepage losses. The final drainage plan shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Plan Revrewer prior to construction permit approval.
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
3. Site construction shall be restricted to the dry weather months (Apri! 1sf through
September 30th).
Response: The condition will be satisfied by the approval of the construction
drawings.
4. The �na! drainage report shal! include a more detailed upstream, downstream, and
potential erosion analysrs. Per CORE requirement #2, a Leve! 2 downstream
analysis is required to better understand erosion and possible concentration of runoff
in erosion sensifive downstream bodies. The applicant should note that a Leve! 3
flow control could be required as part of the Level 2 downstream analysis. A revised
fina! drainage report and associated plans, based on the 2009 King County Surface
Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Renton, is required to be submitted
to the satisfaction of the Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit approval.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of this Technical
Information Report.
5. The applicant shal!design the proposed drainage facility utilizing the Enhanced Basic
water quality menu. A revised final drainage report and associated plans utilizing fhe
Enhanced Basic water quality menu, based on the 2009 King County Surface Water
16834.015.doc
Design Manual as amended by the City of Renton, is required to be submitted to fhe
satisfaction of fhe Plan Reviewer prior to the construcfion permit approval.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Construction Plans
and this Technical Information Report.
6. The applicant shall be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager,
tree retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, �nal grading, and
annually for two years by a quali�ed professiona!forester. The inspection/monitoring
reports shal! identify any retained trees that develop problems due to changing site
conditions and prescribe mitigation.
Response: This condition will be satisfied by the approval of the Final Tree
Protection Plan prepared by Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc.
16834.015.doc
3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS
The proposed Plat of Copperwood is a single-family residential project consisting of 47 lots zoned R4,
and will be utilizing the small lot clustering provisions. The project is 12.68 acres in size containing 8 tax
parcels (152305-9066, 152305-9067, 152305-9201, 152305-9100, 152305-9093, 152305-9170, 152305-
9043, and 152305-9221). The site is located at the intersection of 143rd Avenue S.E. and S.E. 2nd
Place, in a portion of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton. ,
The site is rectangular in shape, and fronts S.E. 2nd Place. The proposed on-site roads are to be tied
into S.E. 2nd Place, and will be extended into the site to provide public access and circulation. This site
is currently developed, with 7 single-family residences, and is currently zoned R4. The existing on-site
improvements consist of storm and water utilities, and gravel driveways that access S.E. 2nd Place.
There is an on-site creek (Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303), on the eastem quarter of the project site.
The creek enters onto the north side of the property via an existing 48-inch culvert that crosses
underneath S.E. 2nd Place. The creek flows in a south easterly direction into the existing Right of Way of
143rd Avenue S.E. before meandering back into the subject property; the creak ultimately leaves the
property at the south side of the project. In the existing condition, runoff generated onsite flows in an
_ easterly fashion towards Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303. In the developed condition generated runoff
will be collected by a system of storm drain pipes and routed to a detention wet pond for flow and water
quality control, and will ultimately be discharged directly to the creek from the proposed drainage facility.
The site is bound along the east property line by 143rd Avenue S.E. and Maplewood Creek Tributary
0303. Along both the south and west boundaries the site is bound by single-family residences. It should
be noted that the southeast corner of the site contains steep slopes, ranging from 15 percent to 70 ,
percent. These steep slopes are to be contained within a Natural Growth Protection Area (NGPA) Tract.
S.E. 2nd Place bounds the site along the north. Access to the site from S.E. 2nd Place will require
frontage improvements, including new asphalt, new curb and gutter, sidewalk, and planter strip.
On-site soils are mapped as Alderwood. Please refer to the Soils Map within Section 1.0 of this report.
All drainage calculations were modeled as till soils.
The project will be constructing roadways consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and street trees. The
site will tie into the existing road at S.E. 2nd Place. All roads for this project have been designed to be 26
feet wide, with an 8-foot planter strip at the back of curb and a 5-foot sidewalk (both sides). Overall, the
proposed public right-of-way is to be 53 feet in width.
The topography on-site is generally flat, with a slight rise in the westernmost portion of the site. The site
generally slopes from west to east, toward Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303, from elevation 398 to 386.
The project will be mass graded with cuts and fills balanced on site. The proposed development also
includes further restoration of the Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 buffer area.
The drainage facilities are required to meet the requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Water ��
Design Manual (KCSWDM), and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. The drainage '
design shall meet, at a minimum, the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Site Conditions. I
The project has been conditioned to provide Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment. The drainage
facility located in Tract B is a combination detention/wet pond, sized for Flow Control Duration Standard I
Matching Forested Site Conditions. The basic wet pond will be sized pursuant to the 2009 KCSWDM and I
the City's amendments. In addition to the basic wet pond a StormFilter with CSF (leaf compost) media
will be used to satisfy the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment requirement. Upon treatment,
stormwater will be discharged to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303, via a riprap pad at the edge of the
ordinary high water mark of the creek channel. Please refer to Section 4.0 for detailed drainage
calculations.
16834.015.doc
UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
The subject property is bound by S.E. 2nd Place to the north, a ridgeline along the western property line,
and Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 to the east. The onsite topography slopes in a southerly direction,
which means that there is no upstream basin tributary to the project site. However, as mentioned above,
Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 enters the north side of the project via a 48-inch culvert that crosses
undemeath S.E. 2nd Place. The basin tributary to this creek is very large with respect to the overall
project site. Utilizing the City of Renton's Surface Water Network map, available on the City's website,
and LIDAR topographic maps we were able to estimate the size of the contributing basin to the creek at
the culvert crossing to be approximately 535 acres. This basin is a mixture of residential neighborhoods
of various zoning, commercial properties, sensitive areas, drainage facilities, city streets, parks, and other
various uses. Per the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments the upstream analysis
shall include an evaluation of the upstream drainage system to verify and document that significant
flooding and erosion impacts will not occur as a result of the proposed project. Based on our review of all
of the known available data, which includes requests from the City and King County for drainage
complaints, and the adopted Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan, there are no
known flooding problems associated with the 48-inch culvert that crosses underneath S.E. 2nd Place into
the property. Additionally there is no evidence that suggests that the existing culvert is not operating
correctly. There are no impacts to the existing culvert as a result of the proposed development. No
additional flows are being added and the culvert is not being modified as a result of construction. Since
' there are no known flooding/conveyance issues associated with the existing culvert and no impacts to the
existing culvert as a result of the proposed development, no further analysis is required. For further detail
please refer to the Upstream Basin Area Map located within this section.
16834.015.doc
TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW I
. Adopted Basin Plans: The site is located within the Lower Cedar River Basin. Refer to
Appendix A for the portions of the basin that applies to this project. �
• Finalized Drainage Studies: This is not applicable.
• Basin Reconnaissance Summary Report: This site is located in the Lower Cedar River Basin,
which is covered by the Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan dated July
1997 (included in Appendix A).
• Critical Drainage Area Maps: This project will not discharge to any critical areas or wetlands as
it will be discharging runoff from the detention pond to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303,
matching pre-developed flows. Therefore, no critical areas are to be affected. '
• Floodplain and Floodway FEMA Maps: Please see the attached FEMA Map (Section 1.0)
utilized for this analysis. As indicated on the map, the site is located in Zone X and is outside of
the 500-year floodplain. �
• Other Off-Site Analysis Reports: A site investigation was conducted in preparation of the
Level2 Off-Site Drainage Analysis. The United States Department of Agriculture Soils
Conservation Service Map is also provided. See Figure 4—Soils Map in Section 1.0. 'I
• Sensitive Areas Folios: Based on review of the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folios, the 'I
site does not contain any On-Site Wetlands, Erosion Areas, Sensitive Areas, or Land Slide Areas. I
• Road Drainage Problems: This is not applicable.
• United States Department of Agriculture King County Soi/s Survey: Based on the Soils Map
(Figure 4 — Soils Map, Section 1.0) for this area, the site is underlain with Alderwood gravelly
sandy loam. The soils were modeled as till soils.
• Wetland lnventory Map: From the Wetland and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Assessment Report by
Soundview Consultants, there is no known documentation or inventory of wetlands for the project
site.
. Migrating River Studies: This is not applicable.
• City of Renton Aquifer Protection Zones: Per the City of Renton's GIS Map, the project site is
not located within an Aquifer Recharge Area.
• King County Drainage Complaints: We received two drainage complaints from King County
within the downstream corridor of Maplewood Creek. Per discussions with King County
representatives, complaints within areas annexed by the Ciry of Renton have been forwarded to
the City for filing. Per the 2009 KCSWDM we are only required to review complaints within the
past 10 years. For further detail of these complaints, please refer to Appendix B.
16834.015.doc
TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION
3.1 Conveyance System Nuisance Problems (Type 1)
- Conveyance system nuisance problems are minor but not chronic flooding or erosion problems
that result from the overflow of a constructed conveyance system that is substandard or has
become too small as a result of upstream development. Such problems warrant additional
attention because of their chronic nature and because they result from the failure of a
conveyance system to provide a minimum acceptable level of protection.
There were no conveyance system nuisance problems observed during the site visit.
Furthermore, based on a review of the drainage complaints received from the City of Renton, '
there is no evidence of past conveyance system nuisance problems occurring in the direct I
downstream drainage course, as there is a record of none having been submitted.
This site will have a flow control facility, which will restrict the flow to match developed discharge
durations to pre-developed durations for the range of pre-developed discharge rates from 50 I
percent of the 2-year peak flow up through the full 50-year peak flow and match developed peak ''
discharge rates to pre-developed peak discharge rates for the 2- and 10-year return periods, all
while assuming forested site conditions. This level of flow control will provide adequate mitigation
to prevent any future drainage complaints as a result of this proposed site development.
3.2 Severe Erosion Problems(Type 2j
Severe erosion problems can be caused by conveyance system overflows or the concentration of
runoff into erosion-sensitive open drainage features. Severe erosion problems warrant additional
attention because they pose a significant threat either to health and safety or to public or private
property.
Erosion is a natural occurrence, especially in drainage courses within ravines. Erosion is the
natural creation process of ravines. In the instance where there are Severe Erosion Problems
within the downstream drainage course as there is within Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 and
0302, the King County Drainage Manual and City of Renton Amendments requires that a project
provides the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Conditions within its detention
facility. This flow control standard is designed to prevent the initiation or aggravation of existing
channel erosion and instability. It is a durational standard that limits the time span during which
post-developed flows exceed an erosion-causing threshold to its pre-developed level. Per Table
1.2.3.A of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and 2010 City of Renton
Amendment if Severe Erosion Problems are identified downstream and the project provides this
level of flow control,then no further flow control is required.
3.3 Severe Flooding Problems (Type 3)
Severe flooding problems can be caused by conveyance system overFlows or the elevated water
surfaces of ponds, lakes, wetlands, or closed depressions. Severe flooding problems are defined
as follows:
• Flooding of the finished area of a habitable building for runoff events less than or equal to
the 100-year event. Examples include flooding of finished floors of homes and '
commercial or industrial buildings. Flooding in electrical/heating systems and
components in the crawlspace or garage of a home. Such problems are referred to as
"severe building flooding problems."
16834.015.do�
• Flooding over all lanes of a roadway or severely impacting a sole access driveway for
runoff events less than or equal to the 100-year event. Such problems are referred to as
"severe roadway flooding problems."
Based on our site visit and a review of the available Drainage Complaints in conjunction with the
Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan there is no evidence of severe
flooding problems downstream of our site.
16834.015.doc
�'�
� TA K 4 DRAINAGE YSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS
S S
�', LEVEL 2 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
In the pre-developed condition, all runoff drains to the Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303. Once it is
collected by the creek tributary, it leaves the site at the southeast corner. In the developed condition,
stormwater that is discharged from the site will be conveyed from the detention pond to Maplewood Creek
Tributary 0303. Steep slopes exist near the southeast corner of#he NGPA, ranging from 15 percent to 70
percent. Stormwater from the detention pond will be discharged via a bubble-up manhole that is armored
with riprap. The riprap will help dissipate the outflows of the pond. In addition to the bubble-up manhole
and riprap armoring, the outlet will be placed at the edge of the stream channel, just above the ordinary
high water mark to ensure no runoff is being introduced over the slopes of the channel. The proposed
detention pond was designed to provide the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Condition
Areas.
Based on our site visit and a review of the available drainage complaints in conjunction with the Lower
Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan it is clear that there are Severe Erosion Problems
along the downstream corridor. This includes portions of Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 and
Maplewood Creek Tributary 0302. Based on the testimony provided by the public during the hearing
process and a review of the drainage complaints it appears that a majority of the erosion concerns can be
attributed to landslides on the banks of the ravines. Of the drainage complaints we obtained one is on a
portion of Tributary 0302 that is upstream of our drainage course. The other is within the '/< mile
downstream corridor of the project. We have included the complaint on Tributary 0302 for reference as it
shows that much of the erosion within this corridor is attributed to runoff that is directed onto the existing
slopes, which are highly erodible. The drainage complaint within '/4 mile of the project site is not really a
complaint as it doesn't point out a specific drainage issue. It is our understanding that the property owner
associated with this drainage complaint submitted a letter to the City of Renton as part of this projecYs
hearing process. We have included a copy of this letter (Exhibit 11 from the Staff Report to the Hearing
Examiner) along with the drainage complaints in Appendix B. The claim by the property owner is that
trees are falling within the ravine due to the creek bed being washed out. If the existing trees are within
the creek bed it is highly likely that they will eventually fall due to the streams natural erosion process. It
is inevitable for a stream bed to erode over time and any tree roots within the stream bed will be exposed.
It is important to note that as slides happen and other various blockages of the stream occur from fallen
vegetation or other foreign objects, the stream will continue to correct itself over time. This may lead to
additional slides within the ravine, but as stated above, this is the natural process of the stream itself. For
further detail please refer to the drainage complaints within Appendix B.
As part of this Level 2 downstream analysis we mapped the contributing basin areas to Maplewood Creek
Tributary 0303 and Maplewood Creek Tributary 0302. We found that these basins are made up of a
mixture of residential neighborhoods of various zoning, commercial properties, sensitive areas, drainage
facilities, city streets, parks, and other various uses. The basins were mapped using a combination of
LIDAR topography, King County Assessor Data, and the City of Renton's Surface Water Network map
located on the City's website. The basin feeding Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 is approximately 535
acres in size at the point where it enters the proposed project. The proposed project is slightly less than
13 acres in size or approximately 2 percent of the overall basin. At the point where Tributary 0303 joins
Tributary 0302 an additional 297 acres of basin area is added, which means the project is approximately
1 percent of the total area tributary to both drainage courses combined. At this point the downstream
corridor is beyond the '/4 mile downstream point from the project site. A Level 2 Downstream Analysis is a
rough quantitative analysis of any downstream flooding, erosion or nuisance problems. It is evident from
all of the public testimony and review of available data along with our site visit that issues surrounding the
downstream drainage system are Severe Erosion Problems and not Severe Flooding Problems.
Quantifying an exact erosion problem is not something that can be calculated because erosion is caused
by continually high peak flows over a period of time. It is not possible to equate the peak flows from this
project site to the peak flows of the overall basin and make a determination that the flows from this project
will increase erosion, as we cannot determine what the naturally occurring erosion-causing threshold is.
However, we can quantify what the overall basin area is and relate that to our proposed development.
16834.015.doc
UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: �
The subject property is bound by S.E. 2nd Place to the north, a ridgeline along the western property line,
and Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 to the east. The onsite topography slopes in a southerly direction,
which means that there is no upstream basin tributary to the project site. However, as mentioned above,
Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 enters the north side of the project via a 48-inch culvert that crosses I
underneath S.E. 2nd Place. The basin tributary to this creek is very large with respect to the overall '
project site. Utilizing the City of Renton's Surface Water Network map, available on the City's website,
and LIDAR topographic maps we were able to estimate the size of the contributing basin to the creek at
the culvert crossing to be approximately 535 acres. This basin is a mixture of residential neighborhoods
of various zoning, commercial properties, sensitive areas, drainage facilities, city streets, parks, and other
various uses. Per the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments the upstream analysis
shall include an evaluation of the upstream drainage system to verify and document that significant
flooding and erosion impacts will not occur as a result of the proposed project. Based on our review of all
of the known available data, which includes requests from the City and King County for drainage
complaints, and the adopted Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan, there are no
known flooding problems associated with the 48-inch culvert that crosses underneath S.E. 2nd Place into
the property. Additionally there is no evidence that suggests that the existing culvert is not operating
correctly. There are no impacts to the existing culvert as a result of the proposed development. No
additional flows are being added and the culvert is not being modified as a result of construction. Since
there are no known floodinglconveyance issues associated with the existing culvert and no impacts to the
existing culvert as a result of the proposed development, no further analysis is required. For further detail
please refer to the Upstream Basin Area Map located within this section.
16834.015.doc I
TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW
� . Adopted Basin Plans: The site is located within the Lower Cedar River Basin. Refer to
' Appendix A for the portions of the basin that applies to this project.
• Finalized Drainage Studies: This is not applicable.
• Basin Reconnaissance Summary Report: This site is located in the Lower Cedar River Basin,
which is covered by the Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan dated July
1997 (included in Appendix A).
• Critical Drainage Area Maps: This project will not discharge to any critical areas or wetlands as
it will be discharging runoff from the detention pond to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303,
matching pre-developed flows. Therefore, no critical areas are to be affected.
• Floodplain and Floodway FEMA Maps: Please see the attached FEMA Map {Section 1.0)
utilized for this analysis. As indicated on the map, the site is located in Zone X and is outside of
the 500-year floodplain.
• Other Off-Site Analysis Reports: A site investigation was conducted in preparation of the
Level2 Off-Site Drainage Analysis. The United States Department of Agriculture Soils
Conservation Service Map is also provided. See Figure 4—Soils Map in Section 1.0.
• Sensitive Areas Folios: Based on review of the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folios, the
site does not contain any On-Site Wetlands, Erosion Areas, Sensitive Areas, or Land Slide Areas.
. Road Drainage Problems: This is not applicable.
• United States Department of Agriculture King County Soi/s Survey: Based on the Soils Map
(Figure 4 — Soils Map, Section 1.0) for this area, the site is underlain with Alderwood gravelly
sandy loam. The soils were modeled as till soils.
• Wetland lnventory Map: From the Wetland and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Assessment Report by
Soundview Consultants, there is no known documentation or inventory of wetlands for the project
site.
. Migrating River Studies: This is not applicable.
• City of Renton Aquifer Protection Zones: Per the City of Renton's GIS Map, the project site is
not located within an Aquifer Recharge Area.
• King County Drainage Complaints: We received two drainage complaints from King Counry
within the downstream corridor of Maplewood Creek. Per discussions with King County
representatives, complaints within areas annexed by the Ciry of Renton have been forwarded to
the City for filing. Per the 2009 KCSWDM we are only required to review complaints within the
past 10 years. For further detail of these complaints, please refer to Appendix B.
�
16834.015.doc
TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION
3.1 Conveyance System Nuisance Problems (Type 1)
Conveyance system nuisance problems are minor but not chronic flooding or erosion problems
that result from the overflow of a constructed conveyance system that is substandard or has
become too small as a result of upstream development. Such problems warrant additional
attention because of their chronic nature and because they result from the failure of a
conveyance system to provide a minimum acceptable level of protection.
There were no conveyance system nuisance problems observed during the site visit.
Furthermore, based on a review of the drainage complaints received from the City of Renton,
there is no evidence of past conveyance system nuisance problems occurring in the direct
downstream drainage course, as there is a record of none having been submitted.
This site will have a flow control facility, which will restrict the flow to match developed discharge
durations to pre-developed durations for the range of pre-developed discharge rates from 50
percent of the 2-year peak flow up through the full 50-year peak flow and match developed peak
discharge rates to pre-developed peak discharge rates for the 2- and 10-year return periods, all
while assuming forested site conditions. This level of flow control will provide adequate mitigation
to prevent any future drainage complaints as a result of this proposed site development.
3.2 Severe Erosion Problems (Type 2)
Severe erosion problems can be caused by conveyance system overflows or the concentration of
runoff into erosion-sensitive open drainage features. Severe erosion problems warrant additional
attention because they pose a significant threat either to health and safety or to public or private
property.
Erosion is a natural occurrence, especially in drainage courses within ravines. Erosion is the
� natural creation process of ravines. In the instance where there are Severe Erosion Problems
within the downstream drainage course as there is within Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 and
0302, the King County Drainage Manual and City of Renton Amendments requires that a project
provides the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Conditions within its detention
facility. This flow control standard is designed to prevent the initiation or aggravation of existing
channel erosion and instability. It is a durational standard that limits the time span during which
post-developed flows exceed an erosion-causing threshold to its pre-developed level. Per Table
1.2.3.A of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and 2010 City of Renton
Amendment if Severe Erosion Problems are identified downstream and the project provides this
level of flow control, then no further flow control is required.
3.3 Severe Flooding Problems (Type 3)
Severe flooding problems can be caused by conveyance system overflows or the elevated water
surfaces of ponds, lakes, wetlands, or closed depressions. Severe flooding problems are defined
as follows:
• Flooding of the finished area of a habitable building for runoff events less than or equal to
the 100-year event. Examples include flooding of finished floors of homes and
commercial or industrial buildings. Flooding in electrical/heating systems and
components in the crawlspace or garage of a home. Such problems are referred to as
"severe building flooding problems."
16834.015.doc
i �
TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS
LEVEL 2 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
In the pre-developed condition, all runoff drains to the Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303. Once it is
collected by the creek tributary, it leaves the site at the southeast corner. In the developed condition,
stormwater that is discharged from the site will be conveyed from the detention pond to Maptewood Creek
Tributary 0303. Steep slopes exist near the southeast corner of the NGPA, ranging from 15 percent to 70
percent. Stormwater from the detention pond will be discharged via an 18-inch pipe onto a riprap pad.
The riprap pad will help dissipate the outFlows of the pond, and will be placed at the edge of the stream
channel, just above the ordinary high water mark to ensure no runoff is being introduced over the slopes
of the channel. The proposed detention pond was designed to provide the Flow Control Duration
Standard Matching Forested Condition Areas.
Based on our site visit and a review of the available drainage complaints in conjunction with the Lower
Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan it is clear that there are Severe Erosion Problems
along the downstream corridor. This includes portions of Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 and
Maplewood Creek Tributary 0302. Based on the testimony provided by the public during the hearing
process and a review of the drainage complaints it appears that a majority of the erosion concerns can be
attributed to landslides on the banks of the ravines. Of the drainage complaints we obtained one is on a
portion of Tributary 0302 that is upstream of our drainage course. The other is within the '/. mile
downstream corridor of the project. We have included the complaint on Tributary 0302 for reference as it
shows that much of the erosion within this corridor is attributed to runoff that is directed onto the existing
slopes, which are highly erodible. The drainage complaint within '/< mile of the project site is not really a
complaint as it doesn't point out a specific drainage issue. It is our understanding that the property owner
associated with this drainage complaint submitted a letter to the City of Renton as part of this projecYs
hearing process. We have included a copy of this letter (Exhibit 11 from the Staff Report to the Hearing
Examiner) along with the drainage complaints in Appendix B. The claim by the property owner is that
trees are falling within the ravine due to the creek bed being washed out. If the existing trees are within
the creek bed it is highly likely that they will eventually fall due to the streams natural erosion process. It
is inevitable for a stream bed to erode over time and any tree roots within the stream bed will be exposed.
It is important to note that as slides happen and other various blockages of the stream occur from fallen
vegetation or other foreign objects, the stream will continue to correct itself over time. This may lead to
additional slides within the ravine, but as stated above, this is the natural process of the stream itself For
further detail please refer to the drainage complaints within Appendix B.
As part of this Level 2 downstream analysis we mapped the contributing basin areas to Maplewood Creek
, Tributary 0303 and Maplewood Creek Tributary 0302. We found that these basins are made up of a
mixture of residential neighborhoods of various zoning, commercial properties, sensitive areas, drainage
facilities, city streets, parks, and other various uses. The basins were mapped using a combination of
LIDAR topography, King County Assessor Data, and the City of Renton's Surface Water Network map
located on the City's website. The basin feeding Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 is approximately 535
acres in size at the point where it enters the proposed project. The proposed project is slightly less than
13 acres in size or approximately 2 percent of the overall basin. At the point where Tributary 0303 joins
- Tributary 0302 an additional 297 acres of basin area is added, which means the project is approximately
1 percent of the total area tributary to both drainage courses combined. At this point the downstream
corridor is beyond the '/<mile downstream point from the project site. A Level 2 Downstream Analysis is a
rough quantitative analysis of any downstream flooding, erosion or nuisance problems. It is evident from
all of the public testimony and review of available data along with our site visit that issues surrounding the
downst�eam drainage system are Severe Erosion Problems and not Severe Flooding Problems
Quantifying an exact erosion problem is not something that can be calculated because erosion is caused
by continually high peak flows over a period of time. It is not possible to equate the peak flows from this
project site to the peak flows of the overall basin and make a determination that the flows from this project
will increase erosion, as we cannot determine what the naturally occurring erosion-causing threshold is
However, we can quantify what the overall basin area is and relate that to our proposed development
Furthermore �ve can equate the flow control �tandards of this proiect to that of the existinq basin which
are commonly acknowledged as being much less restrictive. As noted above the project area makes up
only 2 percent of the overall basin tributary to Maplewood Creek. This project is utilizing the Flow
Duration Standard Matching Forested Site Conditions. In a basin with a majority of the neighborhoods
and/or developments providing various forms of sub-standard flow control; any flows directed to the
downstream system from this project are insignificant compared to the existing condition. Even
increasing the detention faci�ity requirements to the Flood Problem Flow Control Standard would not have
any less impact to the downstream drainage system as this standard only additionally restricts the 100
year release rate which has no direct link to erosion problems. It is our professional opinion that this
project will have no significant impact to the downstream corridor and that no further mitigation is
required.
16834.015.doc
Q
�
�
�
.�
�
W
�
�
W
L
�--i
�
�.
�
, , ,
(��,�'��� ��� M�
iMAP
�� ) _ I, , �- - -" - _ r�aHo sr -- -
� + `-S�_ _�� - - � � � __ i ' '�� '� ti �
� 4 � i I 1 ` � i �i
� _ � ��} � �S__ .'.� 2_- � _.-- W r � '`
V 1 �;ur_cr �_ W ,srcT:�' t/ � '�,�� I � $1
� � � t_ z �
_ �" _�, ',,{ _ � r - _ ___ � : -, d � �� � i
—�-,1-'�— � �_- - . _ z .�f" I' �_ �,isrcr �,f �`��;;� o� I�)
r� , �;
�� �'� ���" � L— � � -- W t �•- � �i
" t�E ts7 a 1`<___ � �r f.l � � x - z -�-�Y `t.r-•-�
—.I ti�t �- ' r_ ;;�'� n � -.� �d --_ �,:._.:C`F __.f-.
_, � �� � ,- - ti; � -- - _'�.
` -��ti'�.14 1S7'ST ��r'"`�"_`,� � �_� ��_'r!NE,13T— � � !'_ '- --- �_-__NE1�ST
r'- — ST, NEISTST-i� �_�—:'-ly r
, r ��1 f - � --
i:' `5.i, .._-.x- �' r r- } �-�.` 1' � i� � r� j- �_. _1 �. �-' � .� - L ,�,�
_; , ; ---� rf . �: - �� �tl � �� ; � ���;�� ,�.
' `l � �����— � 1 �� i
r � �� �' `� � y�' ���' ��' �'•5�'
^ � sE a,n srr � =' � �� � ------ - �� �, `, '-�'' bl I , `o �
ti ' ' t4 Renton �' � � - d � _'
��t � �_ � ��~ I � �� '� ''_ i �' �',
,�, .t ,��t � � •.f r.� � I' ,t �-- � � �
ti�,', �; ,. � l s � ','d � � r
�. `-�•� r c �:.� :!�
' •'ti
� � i _ ..,� k.�� r_ � .__ ��
i
_ ' � � �. i !
�� SE 2ND PL � -- � � - � � " ISE 7NQ PL :
` t` ;•.... � ,I _'. . �7ti�51-�_ �? 't, 1I ..'�..�
'l � � -- `1 ` +'' _ j I. � '�'` � I - rI I
_ � -� ��__ ti `1
- , � }, ��r �� -�_ d --... �,�' �� � _ 4oD
`� '�� t , ���I�,iJ�l`'�� _ _-,;� �.) �-� ,, �J.,
- 1I� f ,� �. ,�ii, r � a I
�� 5 �, ��_ �I I,I 4�' �k�;; , �� , ,I r— " � �1. i
"' �� �- III 1'lh �, � _ �-— __� �'
~�' � � I i - '� ,I MaplewoodPark
_ � ' �' 'R-4 - - '' ' _ _ R,4
,� �
,.' �.
� --=� _..
�N gT ,
� t� I --- � �i
_ - I
. I � y ,
S���N�,: !,,` R'.,� ; �, ' '� �� �' fl. t�
-,.� �,
1, (��-S�} 1�,��- �� �_ .,�
� � ��,i'���`,��;��'� �;��' -' ' .�o �G � R'4 �--� �'' (_�
,, � : ,__ , �' ��,3 __ ; � l; ; ___,
')} '�`�4,;,'i � E ,
} l , � '
,'
,���� _ - -_ ��`+��-�'--=' �.
, �I<<'`' - _ _ -_J 'i t-, �""` _ `;��
,` _ �I, '-� �'--
= — - - - � ; - sE t�rr►�a�-
,.,�._ r`�-�_.^—�'�'- „�; ;;_ — �r _ - �i �
� _ _ _ rr �t�- � Sf 1�piN�3T'—_-, �;
. � 5: - '
S �� _ -_ �� .r .- t ��I '� .� �? I r r';- .,�.
�+t�..' � ` � 'i
� ;a 'f/ -..��� -'� _�`�� i f��. y� �- J+ t3
.���ivC-j�����-�, J/i.�+- C. � � � D i . I�!1 1
r�r �f� ���!" .-� -- � ,� R�4 � R,4 � �
fr`�� � - ��r `�� ;', ; � 4 ';
r, f�;��fj g�u� ,_�-, �I ��_, �' -_ ^ �_ '; �
Ir �f --- , �' +
: '4 ,- ; � _- � _ � _ � ---,� � � _
' i , ' � �_� C r� � '-� } � i�
_ - t''�` �_ l `1.,� 14 �.
� _� �-� �� - �- ,,R•4= ���. �-���
-�.� ,.--�` �_ ; ., _ --._y s� � .��';'� � �.I¢;, •�rsr ;
,�ro sr <
�� '' R.+4 ,` -' R� ; _ ._ .___ � �E,�x�n sT
�C)200A Kinq County � � 0 438tt
The IrAortnation inchrded on this map has been compiled by FOng Co�ty staH hom a variety of sources and is subJect to change withoul nobce.King
Counly makes no representa6ons or warrandes,express or implfed,as to aaaxacy,campleteness,Gmeliness,or rights to the use of such irrformation.
TMs document Is not intended for use es a suney product.King Counry shall not Ce liable fa any general,special,indireU,inGdental,or consequential a �
damages Including,but rrot limiled to,lost revenues or bst profils resulling from the use or misuse of Ihe informaUon contained on this map.Any sele of � King County
tttis map or informatlon on this map is prohibiled except by wmlen pempssion of King Cour�ty.
Dale:M17/2014 Source:King Counry iMAP-Property InfartnaGon(http:/M�ww.metrokc gavlGI�MAP)
Downstream Drainage Map
i MAP
- �,� �_� , _ f j. i_ y �i , � , .�, L--_ i . I - � 4E 151'CT � � I:
�� I"-'�l1 � I �` j^,� '�F/ \ I � `� ! � �5 - __- �W' NEISTCT i - � — Legend
5 � S 1' Z � � � j
r_ �•I l '--�L. i ; 'T -.� � l `_ � T��� �� Y: `,3 ��q� _ �` — '�,�1 r 'j � I _�� t_ I - �!_ ' ' ��y Boutld�ry (� Y•N61�ai
—� 4 j _�.. ,:� - ,, t� ,ti�`1 ! ": ., ti'� � o -- _!ir�.._ d' .;: ��tsr a �—
� % �� --.--.1� l 4 ' -� �� , � :t r r ' RA•25•RuralMna,onaDUpmSaccr�
;`�'�~�_��` � -� -_.-- . It i 1� `; '�-.NEISTST. NEISTST S-� r �;t •` -;; _ SE � ���' r�� '_- - x Mountain Peaks a
"� l � F, ` - l/ ,l� ''NE iST ST E � -�= � i J'~
j i.. �i� SE.1S7.PL � �5{�r'1.I��t��. ,�---.��ll � � '%'4, i� it � �i���' r :,�� � � W �7 �•S•RY13� OBODV Sifl�
'.� � � ' �.� , � - .�. t, � � __ . � 1; - i I - -� , � '.�-� Contours(5ft IightE �. PQ
; i;�;, �' f,� ,�.,'r} }�� • ,�-. 'li.jr-;� r� I •l.' - } � � '-- I. 'LI ;� .� '_' :.. � r-J�I ',:y y '�1s7'p�--- 50D�1000 RA•10-RuralA�,anaDUpQiGar�as
�� - '- � i-' ti''' •�`: i� ti� �l- � � I , 1bQ50D, ❑
,� � '' l - l_ ��� � , t - �SE aND sT �- I � �� +��'i�i t ��-T j � �� I � � ' � �'_ _ r �� uR•lJ rbmi Ra�ro,ona oU 5 m�
� V � �i � •� � ` �_ � � aVp� �'--�� I � c� �. � . � : , a� PQ
r A�HONqy£ , y� , `,';
r� �! C� t}�- r;,r ` �r l l � � �i � � '�� �i � '- � - � ._: _ .
_ .� _ �, , y� - _ i �� - (� ''+ �.', Highways R�1•Rasidmt�onaDUpsaaa
i - � �,�,�- , � L � t•'� �
j�;=� �1� � _ �_ _ ,t�.,.� i; ; , 'i f ' � ` .`,', "a j -_ ( ,s� �J�. fi' � �;� i °b' '�, �� �2NDCT R�.R�+�r,�ou��
L -` U �' ' , ~'� � sEarna _�` I 1,+ -� ,��� "�� 4 � � .;t'� � � �� i ` , ,� Forest Production District
��" r' ; i _
, ' t'�}� _ . � �--3 � � � - - • --.-�t�1S � � ` - s��+n'a���;-i � _��- J 2Nnat .4,,,_sE��r,�..5r � Baundary R�B•Rasidmtial,6DUparacra
r — � f� �-� .�_
f I t� �I � ' R e rito n g��°�� �7�� \� y n �,'� � , { ,� ��i'_1 l.' � R�•R�idantial,S 011 pQ aua
-� � � � , -� ;- _.-�! 4 � __ �`�_- � ,n . _,� � ricultural Praduction Oistrict
-- .j'"`� �- d I � -_-= ' ' - ,��. 1 � (�_' t�,$ � � M _ d - ' � � l� Bounda ry R•12•Rasidmtel,l2 DU pQ acro
_, ,~� t�-,--�,' � `.� �� ; �'� �y � � � 1�'��'�l- I� ,-, _ _-'�_ � o ' R•1!•Rasidmt01.18 D 11 pQ aav
�I. , _ �' � � +(A - =- _i. :i , �
, �- ° , '__ i--, �- , op+: i � •� � -c�� f l� �
ti -s ���r t '' t ��J� Yg�� I', � �+� �_ , I J I _ Urban Growth Area Line � R•2�•R�idantial,21 Dll pQaua
� ''�` � 4��r S ` � � � , �`l � Inco rated Area D
,�� � rr t� t �� � � R��R�idmti�.�A DU pQ saa
� � R� MaplewoodParic
��� �. --_� � �- gk.� .t' � �� ; -- �rl -��ITH sT R'� Stfeets N8•Naiphborhood Bu��
��-,' ;''
I ��'��.- _�� `'n-• ' �! J �--" _ �
��}} 5 f i
\_``�-c- ��.•-'"�r -. � } �' �
�`,��-�._� �'" ti ..rJ ,�� -- } ti } � � -- _ �- o' ilq6vuay (� C8•Coaenonily8usin�s
Q �`� - � j l+ I"`l�w _9�;tN�J I r't " - t -.-�
i" � � `�lt�� ���"' !� i g �r ! ��IDTNqY =-�' �F' " � '- � Arlai�s � RB•Ropional @usin�
„7 � +�� � _ --_ L7 .-ae " Y .�f r ____-. � - _ �. ;I . �Ofi� Q•Q(f'�pp
) D
� � � � � �
, :.
�� - � _ �; _ , R� i' � -ss��n+a� � Lakes and Large Rivers
�,_..._.... .... ....r....,._._. _�_,. .. ..�. _ ' `- ' �� R-4 i•i.a���
r
� -" , ��mrM sr-- �' �,f 5treams ■ �uhar
' t • J_ _ ; ,` _ j '' � ti I R�4 �� R-4 ; _ :..�` Tribal Lands
� �-� :'����4�ti �ta�s�s� `�� ` �° � �, �� '� a � w �` Parcels
�..._. _ Q .� ;;�� _i� 'i'; '' � . � ___ � , � �..
._. ...�___._�� , _ _ i
s�,aarN� � ParkS
___� '���i y f f�r''�'..�,��-���--^•lt�f� � - - , R"'� � l � � lJnlncorporated KC Z�n1ng
; '��'�;�;l,l�� �'� ,.�^� � . _ �_ ._ �v, R�4
,i� � �,;_ , ,�,.���- , �', �, ` - sE,ax►,osr ,, . �.r� srsr _ � .-, � ' ta•AgricuMural,oaaDllpartdaaas
/ = �- l � �' '� i �� ' - = sE�atao si � j �'
� � "�i 'S _� �1 � R� �_ y� j i'• �' -� ` --� _ r n A•S5•Agriaaural,oaaDUpe�Saaes
� ! �, -� � f�� I � � � � SE 1t2�JO R- - - -1�' i I�
� _ ; {` �.r� � �' �� o a �'r I,�� � `i i;1 ��•i n F•Formt
� � _.� l t� :.�� y � d - -. , +R,4 � y, , , � R,4 ,- � � ,, �, �
j = ' .,� �' ' �'�, ' � - l� ���j
4 . �` . ��i 'r 'i A � I { .1� _ � I J
i � R-1 �-,;. �.� � � __�- � �-�,.�R r� �; {;'
; --„--,-,.r_� ... ._ ......r., __...,.,---,,..,,,,,,.„_-�� _ � ' �-- �' i ' i' `,:t `` r 1i R� �___
� �R -sEtmrHsr� �i ;t� i
1 �
- l� -r�� t t "--
�\ I � - _- ` � '� '�� R;a �_ � '.�_._� '�, ; , �___-
\� �--� �. - ` � ' -.� � � - P,� y 1 _ _ ti-
�� , _'� f -� f � ,�,��.; , � -,
. ��
k
�
`,
� 1f
� � HaplewaodGaliCourse � R`� � I . �'Brk� ^ _ � y '� -
f _ -�__
. aee M � t - J�'f - � ----_� `� ��I.> �
��L�c `-� '��-���-, ? �- R-1 =
� � �Fktiiy � ��---_�� -: �
�,�� ,, r -- - R-1 - --
�,� � :__
�,aM� ,, -Cedar River �,
�C)2G08 Kmg Couniy r� � 0 5 980R
The informaGon induded�this map has been compiled by IGng County staff from a variety of souroes and is s�bject to change without notice.King Counry makes no representaGons or warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,tlmeliness,or rights�the use oi such infortnation.This dowment is not
intended for use as a survey produd.King Counry shall not be IiaWe for any general,special,indirect,incidental,or consequential damages includng,but not limited to,lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the infortnation wntained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on tltis map is
prohibited except by written permission of IGng County. '
� King County
� Date:4H7/2014 Source:Kng CouMy iMAP-Property Informatan(http:pwww.metrokc.gov/GISlMAP)
_ Off-Site Analysis Drainage
Syste m Ta b l e
OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE
Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2
Basin: Cedar River Basin Subbasin Name: Lower Cedar River Basin Subbasin Number:
Distance Observations of Field Inspector,
Drainage Component Drainage Component from Site Existing Potential Resource Reviewer,or
Symbol Type,Name,and Size Description Slope Discharge Problems Problems Resident
Constrictions,under capacity,ponding,
Type: sheet flow,swale,stream, overtopping,flooding,habitat or organism
channel,pipe,pond;size, Drainage basin,vegetation,cover, destruction,scouring,bank sloughing, Tributary area,likelihood of problem,
See Map diameter,surface area depth,type of sensitive area,volume % Ft. sedimentation,incision,other erosion overflow pathways,potential impacts
A Stream Maplewood Creek Tributary 0 None None
0303
B Stream Maplewood Creek Tributary 0-3920 None None
' 0303
16834-Off-Site Malysis Drainage System Table.doc
Upstream Basin Area Map
: i
0
� ���, � �
���o � ; � ����
. ��1
� ��
, o
g
,. - �l� ,t=���r� �� �,� ��� ���_ y �
, �
: - - _ ,
__ `T,_ - _, . �� �- �-� _ - - c
,
'�'- _
l�, ," "; , �` � ,.., C� ��
, �,, ��
�
;.
�) ' ��. i ���. �1 � _ � 1...�'� ° ; �k � . � � . � �
--• ��,- ' � . .' � � � � p� p � . ��� ��� . � � _ �
.- �
_ I :. � .�/ '_ ( ��`� " r_1 �. .��/ �-_ - . � � ��. - _ _ ��
� �~ h
�� ' . ' � � � �. . ' _ ' '
�
� r�, � �� ,s�,,, ��(,_ ,�; �'�� �� ,( ��� � � , ' . � � � � -
� .. �
�� o , �
,, .
„,
�,. _ -
� I� l � - i� ��- �� .._ � - r ,��� .�.� _ _ _
� '
, , ; .�
; . ., � ��� _/
, � �- Y� � � � ,�'
� �
� � ,
. � i,
/, ,J, ��-r-.-�.
,
- • �i�!r�'' 4 1,
� 1 : , , -' �
� � � � � � _ � ,_
, � ��
_
.
� �` � If
. � �, �, _ ;. ,,��
� �j '� ��' ( ��ii � i . -� � , � _ � - - �
��� 1
���� � � ����� � � � � � �\.l�_ �� � � ° _
� , r�l � l�� 1 ';. .-��:�, A - , �(' �� � - C (-{�j�
/� �T i . ,',�I�l� , � ��� � �� � — _- �, _C11C]=�
�
` � �� � . �,'� �_' � ���.,;� . .
� �
,
,. _, -
r
Y}� ������r 'I � s.�"". � ) ���� �� _�� ',�/+*-a� ) ���. I� � � y - - -
_��
� �; i - - � ' "�r _' -�
:
.�. _ --•�.,,�.-_. � - -
,, � � � �
�. � �. f _ , ��l_ _ _ _ �_
o /
_
._ ��
,; �) � � . - -
� = � ' -
/ / '/ f ��
: , .
; ,
' '� � � � ��V � -' � � ��;'' �-- ,- . � �r ._,,� �h �f�' p _
_ , • , ;
,.
�!�� � ����� � / � �. � ��` _ � �f df Ll
l � �
� ��. r ,..f. ��' �,- , � � -
, ,/ (� `..�i�- � I ,� ,,' _,___� � __ �� ;__ _. �� E��, � .
; ..
1� ' ,
� I
� f,� ll (__,/ � �� � � ` - 'r' �1 ,r.�� ?1�l � � -
�'�q� � ����V�.�� ,�� i (,l . � � __ - . , � ��� - -
1'�� ` � �� � � . � � � � _ _ � � �,.
�
� � ,{� � � ,;�
'Y � '�� ��1�� �"��'' s � " ,---5 � z� - ��� � � - __ �I
, _
�-' s �nn _
�
.. ,
�.
�//f � l�� � ,� - � � -- _ � - _ � �
- c, ,,
I� �� �� . � , ' h , .�
.
/ �.1 l '���. �� .
_—. . . �._� '
: ' ''
mi�
U loa� - -
, _
, � _ �
_
, , �� - ��� - �- _
�, ,
,
f
[-� �^ . o - ,. -
� � ..
�
. ,
1:.
�i Y- _�_ _,� ; . �� � ;� ,Y, .� ��� � �
_
-� � ,' �'y? r - jr ? ' � . _..,s-
:: . -
/�� �� r�A /� 1�} � ��� ������ ��� � 1� � � ' �� - - ���� 1 -
� .� �
;i �����, ,, ��--� ����I �A� :'�� �� ��1,�� '�Y_
)���' � I����i; .,�� ,��" 1T, � � - ��:� ,-- ;. - _ _ - � r- t� ,
i ;���' �'��, � \ �� `� ��.� '��'� � �'- ��rl l�`� - _ _ t _ ;� , � � � ��� � � ,
� , � � _ � ,
� . � � �� � � �
, ,
� �� � \ - ��� � � �` �� '� �,� � '; - --- -- - - �
�
"
�
��1,�V tT Y;� , �,����� ��� �.�. ��'_ ;_ ' � � Y-�� -_ ' _ _ _ �� . �
,
- � � � �� ,.� , � '��� .,a _,� ,� ��t f� � �. ,,� �
� -�, � _ - - _
' j� .�-� ���:�'�,1� '��: ��` �� ��I���, � _ � �
- �� ,'�``� � `��� � � ' �� � � �_ _ '� ���� � � _ _i _ -- �
J' �� �^'✓� � �� � �0�� 1� - - �� �� , OILU aLD � ' t � .
, .
;
�1 �� r; � �''� ; � �,�.- •� •�,��;� � — C[�U 0 I 11T - , - -, _ ��fi i � - �> �
�
' � . _ _ y _ - - °
_
�'T� - -
,- ;- � � � �;� ,_ ����� /��,�1. _ - a;' �� � -
, :
t II I y '�_
�
, \�--�
.. �., �/} _ _, � ,� ..,_...-,., �r..\ �� I� _ � °� ti) ' , T ."3 --- �. .
�''� 'J - . / "q-� .p...�"� - '� \ \ �� . I� o ... �1 __ /�` J _ �
/� �
� . " \1.��." I �J . " "" li � � .
t . �
.�aT-\,r�•I�'��\�'. , ' S
J
(',. - _ .��, i�� i ,ti � J \. _ / ./�� - �-` .. �,---�t. f l�,'� ( ; . �., _ f
_ ' . ' . I I � ., � �
L�..� �' _ ,� {�' �,, �- : ,.,
,� � � r, �_-� , , ., '� �17 CV �' � � „ � _ ��rl� � � �- __ __ _ �
-.. _ � ,..
.. �, �' �
-�,, ;,, _ , __. .
_ : -
r
' - � i; -1��" �I, _ � ;-J
_ _
� - -
� � , ,
, ` ',��F; I1111ID �
� �-- , �'
-
�_ �� - �Y� h.-,
- ��� � � :� ��� - {- - - _ „�- -
, ,
:: � - ,-1 ' - . � � � _- _- ; _,� �, ,
� �;;j��. � O
.
III, 5
, i : '
-
. �
/ _ _ , .
. _ }- 1 , ,�1 .1_� � - -�
` � � . -
' � � �
� , � , ,f � -mu� p,�
_ _ . _��. . _
., I � �
,,1� � �� ; ,_ �- �i
:. ,
4b
, .
y ' . i � �
. "
, i: .
, )
n
�/ I -+� ,� . 1� - - - - �,
1
_ _ , : J�+H+�-++�N �
� , ; , :,
,
- `,
� - .� _ �t1T_ � . -� _ - - -
�'� ; , _ _ ', — - - — - � ,�f o � - —
� . � � _ , ; _
, `( I I I � ' i�-,; � � - - �, !�' _ �'��' _ _
(� � ' - i,� � _ j _ � _
� _'� `.. . -. . _
� I I I I,I _ ._ l . ��•. ' . , _
�,� � �-,�� I ry . . ,i'� ' I .. .f_ c���r�
... .' U_L_Ll� ���"1 .v�� � � � �..,, � � .�r l� -. . -_ . r . ��'��-," _
� �
' �� ._ � ....�_ _.. ;\ _. .. In!�� ' _ -
I� l. � .. -_ �-_-. .. ,II
, � .. . �.� � ,} � �....
. . ' �., f _ . � ' '_ .— i �� �o, ;`' - _ ��
� � �7I�'I
- �
'�
, - , � I _ __ . , "� I.""'�'�.
, ,. � '
, . / . � ..,.. ; ' __ - �
._
.. _ �. . ., ' �� . "
. _ _ .��J . �
, „� . . �
I 1T�I�
� I-�-�
.
� ;
� I �1' I-��j� _ C1Tf�fT�1
. �; __
�r �
�
...
.
�
.
. . ; . , (. . �t'Cl � I J �� _ . . � ` `
- � ;�- /i�� � �� ��� �i L � - �- _ - �
- ' r , ' � _.�I7-i. ;� I I i_ \. _ - _. - \ -
,
� ,
.
. �
J'(� .
u U ,
_, .
, , ,� r� _ ; . .
� , _ _
:.
; ;�
�
,. �
' _:/ \ `, �',.� . ,.J� ` , � i ri� r�,' �, r �
.i - � ,
J � , r
�
.
_ ' �:.�
,
, , . ,, ��, T ,.- _ a �
^ ` _` �
;,_
� � '� ' - o
� � , `' ' l . , ,; ,� -. , j� �• ��������-�-�-�. — ��
. � .. `
����!;�i ! � - -- _ _ ��� ' � � � � �- �.
� �-. �
ILl_ � , �� � � ,� � - �� , , __.
; � � ,_ - �f-�_ ,, - _ -� - , -. - � ___
.
-_ �� �
�
; } ,. ,�� z r� _ ��- �;`� - � � �
, , -
� � � - a , � _ � _ . , _ ,—
i
.
, }
. �
� �
,`
. � ., � . ,� �,. . . . .' � � . � i� 1( 1( . k . __ '
. � . . .
; 1
� -r " "P. , � .'
_ '� . ♦ �
f� �
;� ,�--,;�:�1.� : _ ' 1 - -' ,' r ' �i t _ ___ ���'.I l� , �.
, . . - , . _ , .:.. - 1 T,
i ,. . - �',�� -
� � 1. �� ' 1
- , ,
,
,-� � �,
.
/ ..'� . ' � j „ ��
�
. �
r_ , _ . ..
. � �
, � : r ,% �; , . �� �t �� -�r-�, ,
;
,
_ ,� // ( j s ' • - ^ _ / /
�
- ---- . - . _ _ .___ - . . ,�. , . .L,-- --
_•; , . __ - � -
�
_ _ '_ '-_'
4
� � � - -
1 � 1 � ' � a'
� _ �, _ _
� , ,: : ,_ `, ,_� r'
� �:� � - � ' ,�^ �ya t,.� � �� �� `� � f
� � � � , ,�. � ;.
i i , ' �� , i, , �, ` � rr
,�l r �� ,, � � �� � ;- - � - � - .- ����� -
_l ° _ � . n
_' � �' �� .,f � 1� ��/\
(t .
� . "_ ' ... - ���� - ,� '
d1 � � � 'I �� � ✓ '_ , � - / i
� . ,' � �'_ i"�,. ., ' �-tr . - _.+� /�
� -� / - ! �\ �,� ' 1 r _ "-
��
! _ '�, `"x � '`_ ' r' `,.
,��.. . ` -
_ . .
, , _ _
„�
. _.
- �j -
_ .� � � _
,�.
.
, � �. �,- °.� _- � �� �� ��� '�-- - _-
., .
, , .._ . � J � _
,
, , ,;
� �.,
�
,
: _ � �, _ � _ _
� /�-�- _
��. .
. �
_, _: _ ,- -
l' L,� ��, i ?, -" t �i _ ,�
v ' ; �, � _ � t - -
. I=\��� -- �-�_1_J
., i �: �, �.
.,
,
�
, �
/
� Nl_ 1 : . ,
,�. /
� i� �_ _. . �r �:.- ,
i ... . . _
_ �. . _ , , _ _ ,
r rI ` I
. �
I . . � LJ ., .•�--. -..� ._ ( �_ r- _� �_•'�. ; ;`i� l.�_� � I. _�1 ,
. � :._�, , I .�.... I .: �. r:�
�� , , ` t
) . � `� `I / /�� .
. e�y ..� . ,. ,
, ^. , '; i �. . �s '. .. .��,!J . � � � . .r � .._ . � � ., � � � ....... __.. �': ��I T1�' '-� .� Q r J (
I I I
i ; . ��;� , -n J : �- �__._--- — _ - _ _. - l�� `)
� �'y ��� �' ` :��r�
_ _ __� - � � " _ � . . �. r � �
.
,
,--� ,
,���_�-��'7�,�--� - _� � ��-�-�r�r1 � Tf T �.�T� 1 � � l�l_�-:� I i�� � "? ��-T -i rnr���`�� �-r-�V�-��: -�, ,<- >>,�-
No. Do1a ey cwa. I�uu�. ee.�s�oo
�oe N�moe. �GHAV� 0..�9�.a_� �`°"' For. Title:
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH QUADRANT HOMES UPSTREAM BASIN AREA MAP
16834 mP �Z KENT, WA 98032 ao,� �u_ „or:o��o�
(425)251-6222 14725 SE 36TH ST. SUITE 100
� CneckeO�IL 1'.500'
s�e.i � �-' ' (425)251-8782 FAX
y �►►. ? "°°,°•°"-�"- °•."`°' BELLEVUE, WA 9808
sp . 0' CIVIL ENGINEERING. LANO PLANNING, N�p
1 n' � �l�N`ENG`NE�'Q SURVEYING, ENVIRDNMENTAL SERVICES Dot� t �� COPPERWOOD
FI,..('�.\IiOI)Ua IIiM54\+Fhi��l I(iH_;q-". .��II�i,i.,�in IAuV'JHV Gul���iri��.11/lU,.'U14 I'."�Y.I'M ..n��. , C�i�LFIf���1�JIJ n�i�1�
4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
A. Existing Site Hydrology
This site is currently developed, with seven single-family residences containing eight tax
parcels (152305-9066, 152305-9067, 152305-9201, 152305-9100, 152305-9093,
152305-9170, 152305-9043, and 152305-9221) and is currently zoned R4. The existing
on-site improvements consist of storm and water utilities, and gravel driveways that
access S.E. 2nd Place. There is a creek on site (Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303), near
the east property line. The existing site drains to Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303,
where it then leaves the site near the southeast corner. The existing discharge location
will be maintained after development as well.
It should be noted that along the existing frontage of S.E. 2nd Place approximately
150 feet west of Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 there is an existing 12-inch culvert that
crosses underneath the roadway from the north. This runoff is routed via ditch line along
the northern boundary of the site to a 12-inch culvert just west of Maplewood Creek
Tributary 0303 where it is discharged into the creek. In the developed condition his flow
path will be maintained through the use of new catch basins with solid locking lids and
new storm pipe that will connect the existing culver crossing underneath S.E. 2nd Place
with the existing 12-inch culvert that discharges into the creek.
Pre-Develoqed Basin:
The Pre-Developed Basin can be broken down as follows:
Total Basin Area = 9.9 Acres
Modeled as Till Forest= 9.9 Acres
The Pre-Develoqed Peak Rates are as follows:
2-year= 0.28 cfs
10-year= 0.48 cfs
100-year= 0.80 cfs
B. Developed Site Hydrology
The completed project will create 47 lots. The total developed area will be 9.9 acres in
size. New impervious surfaces will include roadways, driveways, sidewalks, and roof
areas. The project will be providing landscaped pervious areas, open space areas, and a
drainage facility.
A conveyance system consisting of catch basins and storm pipes will be constructed in
the roadways to collect drainage from impervious surfaces and lots, and conveyed to the
new drainage facility.
A combination detention/wet pond will be constructed in Tract B to provide water quality
and flow control for the project. The pond will contain a control structure fitted with a riser
overflow. To satisfy the condition of approval to provide Enhanced Basic Water Quality,
a StormFilter Vault using CSF media will be installed immediately downstream of the
control structure. From there storm water will be conveyed to Maplewood Creek
Tributary 0303 via a proposed 18-inch outlet pipe and riprap pad above the ordinary high
water mark. The runoff will enter the creek and then be conveyed off site via Maplewood
Creek.
16834.015.doc
Post Developed Basin:
The Post Developed Basin includes the developed basin area tributary to the new
drainage facility. Individual Lot BMPs are required per the 2009 KCSWDM and 2010 City
of Renton Amendments. Full Infiltration and Full Dispersion are not feasible due to the
soil types and limited flow paths available. For purposes of sizing the onsite drainage
facility we utilized the Reduced Impervious Surface Credit Individual Lot BMP. The R-8
zone allows for 75 percent max impervious surface per lot. For purposes of sizing the
drainage facilities we reduced the allowable impervious coverage to 65 percent. The
following list provides a basin area breakdown:
Total Basin Area =9.81 Acres
Till Grass Area = 3.94 Acres
Impervious Area = 5.87 Acres
Impervious Area Breakdown:
Roads& P.A.T. = 1.63 Acres
Lot Impervious Areas: 284,145 sf x 65% =4.24 Acres
The Post Developed peak rates are as follows:
2-year= 1.77 cfs
10-year= 2.14 cfs
100-year= 3.61 cfs
Bvpass Basin:
The Bypass Basin includes a small area along the eastern portion of the S.E. 2nd Place
frontage improvements. Due to the existing elevation of this section of road in relation to
the maximum water surface elevation in the pond we are unable to route the runoff to the
onsite pond. This area is accounted as bypass in the King County Runoff Time Series
(KCRTS) detention facility sizing calculations because the post developed basin and
bypass basin converge into the same drainage basin within '/4 mile downstream of the
site. This basin includes 0.09 acres of impervious area. It should be noted that Water
Quality Treatment is not required as there is less than 5,000 square feet of new
impervious surface within in the Bypass Area. The detention facility has been sized to
accommodate this bypass area.
This bypass basin is to be collected and discharged directly to Maplewood Creek
Tributary 0303 via a new 12-inch culvert placed above the ordinary high water mark at a
0.50 percent slope. The discharge velocity is below 5 fps so a 7- by 8-foot rock lined pad
will be sufficient to prevent slope erosion.
The Bvpass peak rates are as follows:
2-year=0.02 cfs
10-year=0.03 cfs
100-year= 0.04 cfs
C. Performance Standards
The KCRTS Runoff Time Series Program was used to size the detention facility. The
detention pond was sized for the Flow Control Duration Standard Matching Forested Site
Conditions based on the requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City of
16834.015.doc
Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. Individual Lot BMPs are required as well. Full
infiltration and Full Dispersion are not feasible due to the soil types and limited flow paths
available. For purposes of sizing the onsite drainage faciliry we utilized the Reduced
Impervious Surface Credit Individual Lot BMP. The R-8 zone allows for 75 percent max
impervious surface per lot. For purposes of sizing the drainage facilities the allowable
impervious coverage was reduced to 65 percent.
D. Flow Control System
The King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) Program was used to size the detention
facility. Please refer to the KCRTS computations attached in this section. Based on the
detention pond sizing calculations, the pond volume required is 110,677 cubic feet. The
pond volume provided is 131,126 cubic feet.
Overflow sizing calculations are also provided in this section. The pond will contain a
control structure fitted with a riser overflow, a jail house grate, and an emergency
overflow birdcage structure.
The pond outfall will discharge onto a riprap pad sized according to the 2009 King County
Surface Water Design Manual and 2010 City of Renton Amendments. The riprap pad will
be 7.5 feet wide by 12 feet in length and 2 feet deep. The riprap pad will extend 1 foot
above the crown of the 18-inch outlet pipe. The outfall velocity was calculated to be
4.59 ft/s using the 100 year emergency overflow flow rate of 3.61 cfs. Riprap pads are
recommended for outfall velocities ranging from 5 ft/s to 10 ft/s, thus due to the
conservative nature of this design erosion will not be a concern. The riprap pad will also
be installed above the ordinary high water mark and will not negatively impact the
existing creek flow. For further detail please refer to the Flow Master calculations in this
section.
Please refer to the pond sketch in this section for details
E. Water Quality System
The wet pond was sized to provide Basic Water Quality Treatment based on the
requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM and 2010 City of Renton Amendments. Please refer
to the wet pond sizing worksheet in this section for the wet pond sizing calculation. The
wet pond volume required is 31,945 cubic feet. The wet pond volume provided is 38,949
cubic feet. In addition to the wet pond a StormFilter is immediately downstream of the
control structure using cartridges of CSF to satisfy the Enhanced Basic Water Quality
Treatment requirement. For further detail on the sizing of the StormFilter please refer to
the sizing calculations provided by Contech within this section.
Please refer to the pond sketch in this section for details
16834.015.doc
Combination Wetpond/Detention Pond Volume Summary
Project: Copperwood BCE Job# 16834
Detention Volume Required 110,677
Detention Pond Volume Summary
Elevation (ft) Area (sf) Inc. Volume (cf) Total Volume (cf)
377 12,723 o a
378 14,335 13,529 13,529
379 16,004 15,169 28,698
380 17,729 16,866 45,564
381 19,510 18,619 64,184
382 21,348 20,429 84,613
383 23,243 22,295 106,90$
384 25,194 24,218 131,126
Water Quality Volume Required 31,945
Detention Pond Volurne Summary
Elevation (ft} Area (sf) Inc. Volume (cf) Total Volume (cf}
371 905 0 0
372 1,367 1,136 1,136
373 5,228 3,298 4,434
374 6,784 6,006 10,440
375 8,468 7,626 18,066
376 10,288 9,378 27,444
377 12,723 11,506 38,949
D
Determining Number of
C::NTECH Cartridges for Systems
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Downstream of Detention
CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Inc. Engineer: KET
Date 11/3J2014
Site Information
Project Name Copperwood Plat
Project State Washington
Project Location Renton
Drainage Area,Ad 9.90 ac
impervious Area, Ai 5.87 ac
Pervious Area, Ap 4.03
% Impervious 59%
Runoff Coefficient, Rc 0.58
Upstream Detention System
Peak release rate from detention, Qrelease peak 2•29 �fs
Treatment release rate from detention, Q�ease treat 0.18 cfs
Detention pretreatment credit 50%
(from removal efficiency calcs)
Mass loading calculations
Mean Annual Rainfall, P 36 in
Agency required % removal 80%
Percent Runoff Capture 90%
Mean Annual Runoff,V, 679,562 ft'
Event Mean Concentration of Pollutant, EMC 70 mg/I
Annual Mass Load, M,o�i 2967.86 Ibs
Filter System
Filtration brand StormFilter
Cartridge height 18 in
Specific Flow Rate 1.00 gpm/ft2
Number of cartrldges-mass loading
Mass removed by pretreatment system, M�e 1483.93 Ibs
Mass load to filters after preUeatment, M�Ss� 1483.93 Ibs
Estimate the required filter efficiency, Efi� 0.60
Mass to be captured by filters, Nl�i1e� 890.36 Ibs
Allowable Cartridge Flow rate, (�rt 7.50 '
Mass load per cartridge, M�rt(Ibs) 36.00 Ibs
Number of Cartridges required, N,�g 25
Treatment Capacity 0.42 cfs
Determine Critical Sizing Value
Number of Cartridges using Qrelease treat� Nfla,,,, 11
Method to Use: MASS-LOADING
SUMMARY
Treatment Flow Rate, cfs 0.42
Cartridge Flow Rate, gpm 7.5
Number of Cartridges 25
1of1
C=�'::NTECH�
ENGINEERED SDEUTIONS Size and Cost Estimate
?repared by Kathryn Thomason on November 4, 2014
Copperwood Plat— Stormwater Treatment System
Renton, WA
Information provided:
� Total contributing area = 9.90 acre
• lmpervious area = 5.87 acre
• Detention release rate, Qveat= 0.18 Cfs
• Presiding agency= City of Renton, WA
Assumptions:
• Media = CSF cartridges
• Cartridge Height = 18"
• Per cartridge flow rate = 7.5 gpm
• Drop required from inlet to outlet= 2.3' minimum
Size and cost estimates:
The StormFilter is a flow-based system, and therefore, is sized by calculating the peak water quality flow rate
associated with the design storm. However, when the StormFifter is placed downstream o#detention the flow rate
generated at the water quality storm is not always representative of the total volume of water that will go through the
system or type of pollutant-loading the system may experfence in one year.
ror this site, Contech Engineered Solutions LLC recommends using an 8x14 Peak Diversion StormFi(ter with 25
,:artridges(see attached detail). The estimated cost of this system is 65 900, complete and delivered to the job site.
This estimafe assumes that the vault is 7 feet deep. The final system cost will depend on the actual depth of#he unit
and whether extras like doors ra#her than castings are specified. The contractor is responsible for setting the
StormFilter and all extemal plumbing.
Typically, precast StorrnFilters have internal bypass capacities of 1.8 cfs. Since the peak discharge off the site is
expected to exceed this rate, we recommend using the peak diversion StormFilter with an integrated high-flow
bypass.
02012 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC 11835 NE Glenn Widing Dr.,Portland OR 97220 Page 1 of 1
���U�z�.ContechFS cnm Tofl-free:800.548.4667 Fax:8{}0.561.1271 TS-P022
W DRAINAGE FACILITY PLAN AND DETAILS
° � COPPERWOOD I��
J a �o zo �o PTN OF THE NW1J4,OF ThiE SE1/4 OF SEC. 15 !
:m
� :���n��rr_ COV57RUCT GRM£L ACCESS PoIA F1EYaT1'v�=3B6.5,7 I�
��o.�To,;�ma n�ucn�� 1WP.23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W.M. !
s' � GTY OF RENTON, KING COUPtTY: STATE OF WASHINGTON
� ..� � �, .
� GB�;j ��`�`8b.2S STQRItlA,iERYMIIT \., �' \' � .
Q l2'SD �� PFA D�=TWI S�Efi 48. .`� � ��\� � �.� 'i
� � 20'ti:�E SY�t4G f{ /-7�lF 18'SD O 0.55�;'� �� "•
CATE S'Cfi WS�JO( �` �e�?3 { / �, � \�-.,�+.. ���K� E�l7J.75(187 SfCON0�4RY N9.ET PER
� _ SiD P:AN SrEEf 26� \I / 17 LF i8'S9 O O.SSx `;�\ ��.,.'�� W/p�pppp pqp p� CA_R.S�D OEfAIL Z34.10
�,p. # / � �`.;:. \.�'._'�.. SPECS SNEET 15.
� / . �• t r T
`� � � � .{r �_fr--��C911 20 tf 1B'S4'O 19.75x \''.:., �." '�. .+,, S_Of kL ON StiEEi 1b ,YULHOUSE- ... CnERfLOW F1fVAiqN 3Bb.00
E
a W Wsik1?BNJ � `?� ..`� .�'� -,`�.. E-38<.00
Z SK:N ON fEMCE �� _t' ""� . :::,� ��`•.''�!�
� a PER DETM1IL / � ��� a,� �\'�`'.
5H[[r t�. I' � ;` t � ra•�o ;'��`��' �.'.
o Ij . 0.55x y�i r �.s^}�"� . .
s O FLOIY CONTft� � 51 ;�.� � �'.
a STRtICTU3_ ' MERGENCY OVEFd�LC11 1 � �r�_ S� \_ uRIFlCE X2
P£R QETNL SRLIYAY PER DE•AL I . . �
TM4 SstEET " -_'___ ��.TMIS 97E� � � i�" �� 'E=381 y5 5')
� - - � � � � �,ti= l� .� ,\ a E�eati�a�s�racroR
� ---- a , � �-�-�-'1 +� ' cR��ce e_s.00'
'� I :� .1 `\ \`� � t tt i ; r � ,.�\� .:.....'�\
.. / - -
`.�`. � �.J�6-; - � 5
�i : , `( ;� - Q'� � ��s�u, ----- � � \ \'.`� C
i���. i �i � ' -- - � J � ` `` - •'����_�\ �� ....,.'; o � o
20'NDE..S�G � �i � .� ,��.
C.RE'PER W�OT � � � /'i •\ �`��� \ 6'M(21 BIACK Y►�IYL C�W4 �`-r'�___c-" '`�'�'�''\ . . .w-
\� \'.,.:,`..`�\ ��.'�..,:,.\ ��
STO FI.aN S£GT 26 � � J � + . � ♦ , UNC FEHCE PEd NSflfA '_�3_�i �- .. \ '' '- � ' �:
_. � � i 1 i t�`' ��,� � 5T0 PLAN SlEEi 13 � \\ .., . �• IB'RISER�
� �\, .. . .�, m�
.. � � i � 1�� � ``�`�� � � �LONG tOP 0/POND .. ...,�•...''.. •.\\\�•.:•�.;-�.:.-.,.; ..
`, a`\ ` `` \ 18'IFILET '8" WTIEt
�' a � < < � i "� ♦ ` � `\ �' ,�
30 IF 18 50 &3274 � � 1 � � ``fV� e,, ' .. �. � � '`'. .
��. �� t i � 't \ 1 .. '� i\ �t.: . \ ElBov R£SttaCiOR
�
. ` i t� `1 '1 ` ``��`, �` 4S ' _. . t \ ..'; �,1
��a»so(ia'f ` ', , � � � �. �n � \ s'sHt�x o
N DEBRS�ER � i � � ♦ '.RACf LNE ��.�`.'.,:,,�.,� . �-37:.00
� � �Yt' � � ` ��� ��\ �,\ \. �'�.' \ � ��"�.. \ GATE -'�E=377.U0
1 } l , , �. ' �� � � . ' e
' ''' t� `t t `� i ` �`���`, �� B TFil1CT A �`. �\\� `t a
B 1 � � � � �` �' o
.. '} 1 '� ' ' \ o
15 t 5. i t � � ��. ` `\ t5 ';`�-. � :,- /' �\ :�
:� t � i t- , - � \
��wa 1 ���� o � } � �°�l\�.`�i.s � �` � . `:`-. ��`;.'•,.�`.,�'':..`;.�'•�,.`' / l
�+ � � t i i \ � ''.� .� \ t I e
1 i � � i i '
1� � I � i � � � �•\`�� ``� ` $SA7�C NATER SU�Fh4E .`:� . . �..i.'.1 \ '• / � RESTRICTOR PUTE
. - � � � � � i `. �� � tt=377.00 � , \ �� ���. � WR11 SHOP opiLlE3 OR�iCE
i � ; i i � . �� `� . . . 1 .. - � iE=J75.00
� i � - i i ����� ,� . , 1 ` �:,';� .�9 `. . .. ocn._i.w'
� � � � �`� \ � '.s
� � � � � � � . �`. � \ 1 � I . ��s�;� eonw o�su�av ae�=��t.co
i � � � i � � 11�1!IYATER SURFMCE
i � � � ��W� ` ` �.\\ `, ` a.3e+.00 �� � � .;` scc�n+�r iw� �a� S£CTION VIE'�"� A-A
212 LF 30'S0 O 1.72% .12 ' i i � t i 4rET.i'».D . � `�� � �� � � roL7E5:
� `
. �
i . � i i !E_.37LOQ ����. ��, � � � �� I� - i� 3 I. R:F�R TO C.OR.SID C{'Ni ?3:.tl0
i � � i I. `\ �\ �, �1 � �i �� :��.l ' - EK F191 8�R
I '
. � ! 1 I � �� 1 � � 1 � � `-. �:1
,��, ; � '� ; � � } � � � � ; :............., : � : I i Row�s�cTOR
� � Pvw vi Ew
, � , � ------ � , , i � � ��...:• i s
�� -'-- �_�-"_ --- �!___ � ' � � � � TOP OF ACFE . ��.I � j CB�Z TYPE Z"S4�
i � � t i t •A7UMOWL EOT�P NOiE:
i �� +� �� ��.��..� i' Y6 PROJECi i5 V4M1G TNE FEDEICED YPUMOUS
iE=173.�J(307 � �� --"--- '- - '-- -�7�'-- __ %0%' � i' 2t .�.I � StIRF�CE CREDrt TO YCET TeE HJ:4!WAL L0T ��`2�
/RpRM PID T7t '� i� `'Y\\i _'____'.376-_ 6 ���4'377.Op ' �+�i , � � i�r �., // - .:� .. � � � FOOIPRINT�BPNTNMt�EREOlJRES F�IX1pqC 1MED
SPEC59'�EE� 15. � �� \+L \i "'_____- � i ��f � � j .� N10WA81E INVEFNOJS COvFRICE BY 10 PERCEI(f.
d .� 5 � ` � _"- ' � � � . I.
.1"� '1\ �1� �' �_�{ _ .r`/ /� ' I ' ; Y .. . / . ,� �: �•{ c�s,�cr��H�i�n;e cKoa��E 4{t T,�i k�aC
_ �� � , , �----� - , , �' ;I �� _��i �� c.o.a caoE aushR PaoJEcrs�n t'c a-s zanE v4 r
� �. i � i i i � . �i �i�•. 7 � � J�� � .
i �J�, �t. I :F� +1RE TO USE iE R-B�AK REONRENENfS 0���� 4:•- O
t � Y � - �i `'••�� � i I i�. i / '. i.' /,� .I �I'/� R-8 ZOM ALlO'NS 75L 4AX�NPERNOVS COVERAGE � ��y
S COHSTRt1C7 GRAVEL� � J i .yg� i . .�' �,, � i /r � ` i � , - � � . .`j' PER lQf. � � �
:� �,- !� ' r r I �i /�/ '��
n ��/2'cRu9fD i � ' i � �. �� y B0�01+OF � �'•.t, � i r' - . � � � � ( �� 7HE CRATY�CE FACUn'wS BEEN SZED �' � s' '� �'o r����zJ�o �„�
i SURfACHC TOF CWRSE` :i� � � � ��i�-Yx EL �.00 r �' �., �� � � ' - / � - •I r'� ` - p _ : : i �di E51G NA7(a1PERN0U5 C04ER�LE PER LOT. R t_ � Fj.s�rStER G���
� 2-�/2���i r i i � ��V- � i �� i : _ -,: � � 04E�LE \`\
- SUFFnC�NG 80.5E �. f i � i . i .-y1i� }Trti. r` iI i i. i i� I . - / : ��p r•' f/� : 'TRAGT 8 POAD DATA: �� -J A 0���Ri� �Nt� r
" i � � i � � � �t �-� ' C7u0HED NE7o0YC/DE'ENTMN PoIO �
x COURSE � �! i i i . � '1 � � i1 v�� i ! pEAp STpitACE � �� - - � �:4EL] F;0'�CONSFQ � - �.
� � •o ':. i � ' � i �' � f�i' , � r•7`� � � / -. EL=37�.OU . /. ..i�j // ����::..� � � p�4MUu TOP OF PON)EL=188.W TYPE 2 ..
o . � '•.� � i i �i ,�� a .}. , �;� � ::� �� e� i � � � ��.� l..'. E1AiRGENCY 0'h3GL0Vi tATER SURFACE El=kS.00 C8 SEC710H A-a � ��
.G i '4.., �x� i ' �� y��f:! �,i` � '�/i e � � - x J' � aF:' � EMERCENCY QYEfSL01Y SPiLLWAY El.J8�.65 � zW
� 1 i t ]S_ � r �/ � � � : . . ��� � �I /' � RSER OYERFION WA'ER Si1FtFACE Et-39�.15 P:AN NEY1 NO SCALE � _� �,
. � � i � 1 .372'__,-�l1'� � � � � � DESIGN NfAIEP SURFACE 1=38�.00 Iq SCALE O �i
.- i � F: � � �� �� i' i i� i i �� . ' � �/� .�i.'`,+,•';• .•'� � STATIC WA7ER SURFAC°EL-377.00 � �
� ' `�� � -'�y�----- % % ' '� '•. ' . I: I r' �;':i'r'f';'',:`• ` CELL/1 SE�iNENT ST0.RAGE EL-3�i.00 rroTts ,,, a j
�v� � �___�:'. � � � ..,�%;'.:'.: �;.;
„� �� �:. � �/ � � i �-. � /f;;:::t �� CELL 2 SEa4ENT STORlGE EL�373.00 1. f.fFER i0 C.O.R.5Tp OEiA4 23320 � � �_
J � ` '-��---- ' ' `.% /�_:� -;)�;F.`. �eu i sorra�+ov xE�eaw ei=a�o.00 z �
a� ��
!.:,".r r/!: :ei��z eona+ov;�Twrm e�-Sn.00 C8$2B >„��e., n .o
.�:, ���� •' � �-.':;.;,:;.',,:::::,•',j,,..�,:-.i //... a �
� � � , --_�Q__`� ✓ - � i' �/ SQ' . I/: � 7ETE"R�DIi P010 VOtI1ME REOUIRfD�if0.677 CF, o N m ¢
• _' /' � '�f' PcrYo va�ue aQaroco=is,.ue cr. EMERGENCY OVERROW S'PLLWAY o ��^ _
'�, '1 w�
° '_\ �__3@0___'__�____- � j` �. . �.��'�. ,.'.J , PCkD L4.CNE COHSSPi1Cim:'_____CF. Z rn�o a� W
f+ �'� 'I� I;:�..f` '� �+GT Tp cC.4E N ¢
v' ♦` , ''' ' �..�. E N Sf NCRE4 'TAL Y0��11 iOTAL n ��� v�
o '_.`�51______��____'-',''/ .'"�� '.r':��'.:`. '`�f•''•i� 1 7 p�p��G�p���/ �rr�y� � tv t� Z
n \ / - � '�.� 7 11}35 73'79 IS '�
` ''� \"'1-��_ :`.7,!? �i�� .'�f t�.F.f: �OGI"vYl GIYI�M/N��GI'1 IR/�� .- �N ifl
N\ J�
--.�•��� ��.. 7 1 7 I pOt� gCRM E48NiK11iNf5 MVST BE CONSTRUC7Ep CN NA 1 7 �Z N N
. �1��� i�i�i r J/���i!!/�!�%�%�:'',r T1Nf CONSOLDA£D oo w v �S �
E i7 �6866 AS5
;.�:'�`L�.`::'i,'':`�'.�`.. I 1 �0 t6619 4 �(���M�Y COWALTED AYD STABLE F�.L SWLS ANKY2ED BY A '- Y�`-� �'�
i - `• � ��f- i !'r !;�� ia":`::':�,''r r i!r f�;';''�� t B 2o�29 6161 CEC7ECiNiUL ENCdEEay FREE OF 1005E SUfM'ACE SOIL AqTEfarlS.ROOTS.
-- `_�98._____ � ! �.� ��J.�. �.:� J 2sJ 27 95 1 AND OTtiER O3liW�C DE�eS.
g _ - ' � :'/r'�.i:`ir�'.''�.' % /'�,':':':':`:�;;i_':':`�:1 � �
_ �",:�' �:' ,:.;:;; , . . � � „ GN "�s
'f :: �i`f.`i:,:;. b
-- �,`"> ':`�:' �::-`' � E7tCAVA1E A KEi'EOWL TO 50x OF THE BEWI E4BA1K4ENf yV �
� � ..f.::�,��.� METP010 Y0.UqE REOUi£�.71.345 CF' CROSS-SECfiON�l FE1Glli AND WIDM ,p
�
'"��7 I.'';�i�f i i::`.;.�.�:�: ,;�NETPCND YOLUE PRD4U£D=39.9�9 Cf.
� ,��j'f,i`,��;�:�'i';�;':'� J
c i L'_NirTM TO M9DTH R.U10=7:1 =
TlIE B:fi4 E48ANKNENT SFACL 9E CO�SiRLCTEO"..F SOl RACE]W 6-INCH Q - t9
„� 'E 'ATI�N AREA 5� ?1CREMENi' T �F7$CpypAC1ED TO Ai LFAST 95x OF WV(YIJI D�Y OEN91Y.iY1irIN 2 '���. W
� � 1 D 0 PERCEMAGE PONT$Oi T1[OPT0.K:H N71STLLR"c CONTE47,lYOpp'IEp pROCS'pR T. � '
� 7 1 36) I IS6 1 1 METIqJ tiSTM DI557.lpITF.N TME FO'10MNG 5�CHhRACTEN15TrC5:A � ? a
_ S 8 �4 Wf6AU4 CF 20S SlT!UO CUY.A IU%MiY OF 60i SMiO,A 4A7(O/UJA pF J_ �
= 1 678{ 6 IJ! 6p1C 51�T IND CaY,w1T4 N059�A1 QU1EL AND COB�E CONTEkT. NO'E:!N ��1� � yJ .-
.c VERIICAL DATUM ``� OF�M� � � 46B 7 7 I� i �NF�p�GIVATE�d..4C4k 711L IS MELL SUffEO FOR BER1M C4&1N(M:NT v� I CON
ptt OF REMJH�tMVJ 68 1 7 • �
i P�PAR'TMENT OP P[JBLIC WORK9 NAC�FACtLf�Y PLAN Af�DEfAILS
� BE[VCHMARK � �Z,;1'.20' �:i�M� '� •0�06�2014 (j
� FOIN]N6HUMJIT IN CASf •�� �� � , "'�"" CITY OF C�,���p ,�,,,�
V[RT.: 1'+N A r
o coNc uoMwtKT r/ea�ss n�� �w o.a 2 REV5E0 fER CffY RENEW ruc �o/�s a�T � =` ' �UADRAIJT HOMES ,...k„ �
o �o�, ���� RENTON
cm cv�r�roN cacAa: �s,, o,.,� i RENSEO PER Cfi!FEl'ffW e�r > >s u an � �� 6ATl1M �o,,,,�„�a�,�ie:�y/a�,a�o wo.�s �Pc. 14725 SE 361N ST.SUfTE 200 u
�'a PqM Y0.�78 E1=391.OIfi p� � ��� AOM�.
� . (JI.NE 2012) ,,pR��� a� N0. REVIS!ON BY pqTE APPR � ""`�`O�''`• �L.LG�VE� WA .70W17 �
�� p��
A -- NNNNAA
� DRAINAGE FACILITY SECTIONS AND DETAILS
p FOR
� co�p.��woo�
U ,
W PTN OF THE fVW1/4, OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15
J
" TWP.23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M.
CITY OF AEIVTON, KWG COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON
OQ � . i _ __. _ : _ i . � _ i I _ � .: i [ws-M,cwioE b s[cnoa : j 395 400 _ ' _ ,_ _--- -- - - :. _ - . _ . _ __: �
� i _ ; _ I � _ __ _- . - . .- --
W � ... I .. ... __ ` _- _ . . ._.� ... .. I .. ' . . . '� .. . . _� . ._ ., . . m � . . ._ ... _._ __ ...� . _. _. _ _ _ .�___ .
1 . ... > _ _
� � _ ' - �. _ _ . .- - - _ __- - _._ ---- - - - ----------
, . , 1 __� �_
' s
: _
_ _
a asa _ { � � _.. __ -- 3 - -- - - _ -- - - -�; aso a9s _ _ _ -- -- -- ----__ - 3es
�� a uJ � - � - - � - _ _- —_ _ _ _ _ _
� -. ' TOP OF ru��El=J8670 " � �. & _. _.. _ . . . . . _.. .. .. _ .
3 O , -- - . , - _ E` .__ - _ — - _ __
1 �
_
_
; c.� ; � ; � - _ � _ � ��- � , :- _ -' � : _ --= --_ : _ _ _ _ — --_ _ _ ;
i
� � . . i . � . ... _ __ . . � ... _.. .. . O — ." . _ ".. .. .. — _� _ �
.. � ... . � ... .... . I._. _... . _ �,,. .._�- t ....._ . .! . . � � ..... . r . . �.�IIPG.GRA�E Q�.SEZTpN __. . .. _.. ... _. . -' -_ .. . .
� _ _
_: �
� ._- ._ I .�_ 1_ ... �Y.1'I- ........ . N.i ....�Kev:u W�TER Ci.�/�FL �9�Oi.. .... ._ ._I __._. ..._' '� ! __'. .. . 6� �_ __"--'___ ___..._._ .. � _. ... . � ..
� _ _ i_ _._ . - - ; :: - _- -- roP_a w.�o-�i=x6.00 _ -_- _� - -_ _
, : -
.. . .'. . i...-: ..�.__. .i . ...... . ....s _ . _ � .... ... i ..... __ ._. .... ._ _ _,._ _ . .. _ _ _.._ -_- _ _ . ._- .. ..__ _ 6�lN�BEl91� ..
_ _ ... - •'�'.L ..
�
- t ' � .�> . � . . , . : ' _ ' ._ � _.. .._ _ . . ' __ _, _ _.' '_ .__ ... _ ._
... ; ... _ __ . . .._.__ t _... _ _ .' __.� .. ._-_ ._ _ ��� _'__- - _ _ _
._ __. ._ ... . ..� ' ___ ,` �
�
_ __ .. . ._. '-' _.�� �_�� '_.__-_--_-
��. fl�78fi.00
� , . 1 , : ; , : ., _ :� -- -
�0 _ � : c=3�4�,c�z, _ ; -- __ 3s° � . —_ ... - �e'
j �
__ , � . . -WI�8R6 BEI�IER ._:.� � ._ . , S±NmE 8EIt11 - .. -. j . _ . _— - . .. AT R __ __ _.. . � _
--: ! •-- I - a T��YL. _A=in.oa_ I ; �e�-sn.00 T ' { I . _ � -_ _. - - -_ - _ _:_.
. TE F _. _ ... `.. FFOPOA I CR�DE O 5: 1�
-� - ---- - -- . ... _ . �.:._ . . � '
- _�
`�i�-_
._._.._ i _- .. .. ..__. I �.. :�':�. �. CELI 12...-� :_ ..-.-.�I��. . . .�� ;. � � .LOl/1� . . . . ... . . . . �-� - �.. .-
._. . _. .._ .. . _. �
-
' --- _
375 __ . _ j I ` I � ' I Sr� -- -- _ � � : -- - __ -_.: �
__ _ . -- - _ ' --
-- _ _ .: � -�._ ... _ _ •- i --- - - _ _— --
_ . _ � emray _ _ __ �nS ru�rot e��ti 3»m --
-::_ .-"_:. . . � --- -. . _ . � _ ._ I __ ....� : 4 = . _ .. �-.: ._ . .. . - - .. -- -- --._ -' -. _ __PAOPOSEQ G�DE 6 SECiIiNi-
�, -.� .� � 9. .
-_ .� �- ' . 7�g"1NNNEAl GRAOE EL-373.6J. . . { - . . � . . � _ .. . 1� __ ..�. ._ - ' . - �. ..— .— __._._ 1 DFA7 .
1 TI OF
� - w�v ia•cff� rueuc - _. � . . �. ' --.. ..- _ 370 375 . - -- --- - --- -- - _ 375
y _ _
; __ i _ .
_ _ �i rz
----- ---_. _ ___ : -- -- -
� __ . __ � _ . . , , -
: __ _ � � � _ . - ------�------ _ _ - _.. -= -- _ _
_- ---_. _. .. . . . _ .-------- - — - -
. � _ � - - -- _
N..� _ _..__. .__i ..__ . __ i . ._. .. .. . ._ ... ... . .. "_""___ __ _ ' __ _- __ ...
� . J .17792�.5E - :- - . : ' ...- . . SEGIY'ENT .. .. ... . . ' ---.807TOp UF CELI f2 E[=3T2.00 _. _ . __._ __ ..
1' STORAGE I�S71.00..�
._.._. �L�':13679J�. ::. _. ...- ..:. ... :.- � �� i �:�. . � . .-.: .__� .. _ , .. ... .. ... _. :�� .. . _ � .: - ._ �. .__ ._. ... ... . ... - - __ .- :_ ..... . ..
_._. "
,� ..._ .. RN=3B650. ... . ___ _.�'__ _.._ ._.__. I � . ' . __ .. ._ �. . _. .. .i .- . . . . �5 �� _ . ___._"_ __ _ -_- .. f'SEi7MENF STOR4t�EL 373.00. ..-__ _ �O
. _ �. ._ . ._. ; __ I ._-. _ i .. _ � - -- .. . EnSIWG GRA9E .. i _ ... � . .. - ---- -- _ .. _ . .._ ..__[7fISIIF�.GFMJ-"_ .... _.. ..
1 c=.3noa ia-s�} - � _ -- -- - - =_- -_ o s�c�a�v-; - � _ — SECTION B-B _ o s�cna�--
� , _ $ECTION A-A � — - - -
_ � � _ __ __ .._ :-- __ - _ _ : 1 . --__- .. _- _ -- cr r°e . _
.._ ._ 1_ __ ��—�_ �__ . .. --ac,�c - o_-='hkT�i`.g � --: - ��Ct�r�'ry j�E j Z��',.o' �E¢i. i"�5 __Q�11_
� 3
,�� I
- -----�-- � - - � � _ _ _ _ - --- _
- - :- -- -- --
,� _ : --t— - -- - I � - i- -- --I . _ . i i __ i _ 3B� 365 ---- ---- _ ___ _ . _ ------ -- �
r.om
�� �o! n li g o m$ a rn g m'i$ n. �c ., o
m a w�O
�n � ro n � � m n,^,`'', n� 3� :4 �,
i
i
1i00 2f�00 3f00 4f00 1}00 2i00 3}00
3B0 390
, ; t- ----
cwoc e secran , _ � _ _
385-. :.., _ j . . . . . _._. .. . . . . " . . _-..� �,yTAlk'
_�SiA��_. { "-- ,.� '- : . . .: . WSIMG GRADE O SE . .. .- .. .. . . . . Q��F 11ASa���CT
. _ . . "�---, . � °� o
30 L -�18 CPER O 83; PUBLtL ', , � ... . �``~����. . .. .� . .- � PoPRFP PM PER�.
r
0.�- ,
_ � �Z
-- _-` -. .. . . _._. ,: , .� �::�_ � . �-------- -«__ . . SPECSTt765f�EET ,� �
i ..— ._..-�._ �- . .._. _ , . .... . . . ::.- .-.. . . . �--- --- '� � .�
. ,, � -i �n {' 2} �
_.. ..
i `�.__ .___' ._ __ _.. __. i_,_ .. __.._ . . _. ... __ . ... . . . . � ��f..���ii:t�-�' at:
i . _ _._. . _. . __ _.. _ .._. . . ._ _. _ . . .._ . �,. . ._.. _ . ._. . _. ' � � Si ��6.
� _ - - -_ - -- - _ _ _ i �,' Ya u�� RQQK PEiOTECl10N AT OUTFe1�a �MAi t
_ . .. .-._ __ ._ , _. . . . __
x _ ..._" _ __. . _ , ._.. - .. .. . �_ � �. ..'_-' .�.�_ ..�._ � � ROCK LNIMG OU7FALL SPECiiG'IChS�
-F1�377.00 -
� ...... _ __ �... _ __ - _-_ . . ._ __._ .. —'_._ _- .�.�.�- . '�� . // RDCK LJNMG SMALL BE WARRY SPAlS M.'ti CnM�TIp+AS FGLLOWS:
- . ._._ . . ___ _ ' '_ ._ . _ _.... . . . _." _' _ ._'._ '. C N H � 1�
� �s ... . . . ._ �, . . .._..� ..__ .__-_. -._. - _.__ �� ?/SSNG 3-tJCH S�OAFE SIEVE: t�bC�NAl(IeiUM ��
. . _ ...' 7_ --. - . .. ._.. _. __ - / P�459NG 3/4-INQi SOUAf�SIfVE:0-10Z 4UxIAtUN r
�. _ _ _ _ . _ � Z�
. .. . •. __ _ . . ._ ... .._ _. _._ _.. Q DaEN51DN5� � �
Y N, ` .. . . ._ ._. ___ _ _ ... ..__ .. THICNtE55:�1�F00T �
� 17792dS6 _ _ . _ _ ... W LOCI�dOLD{PLL�IC� . ; . .-. _� .... �-� . ��. �- wiOTH: DaIYEiER+ 6 FEET � X �i
-� E 1Dt�679Af . . _ . . _.. ' - _. _ {P _• . ._. . ._ .. . - . .. LFNG7H: 8 FEET IXi� z D.MIETFR, a W
� �O . � . . _�Rll.}g�. 1 . . _.. � .._-. _... " . _ . __ . � iE 373.T5(iD �� NE�VtT� ttC�µE�ER't�a E�TER a O N� U 7F
� E�S/7.P7(�8'N} -_ _ " E; �Jtt .�8 ;- ..- e�eVi t�ev �Zgg C:
n �=3n.a�(ie'sE> ie-_s� 5�(�s'sl - - o ao cr n z3 n
., 77 lF 18'C�P O 0.55% r,ia.t ie�. 3� s�(,a'++? - -- -�- - ; _ . - eiaww artrnu s� nan z °O w�, cC
o . _. . . _ - IE.�=�F 57(16'Ej - . . --: . -�. � _� _ Ca rn�D C
� � . . . T __ .. � ,.... .. � . . . . . _.. � � 11ED141 STOnE S�iZE E o�6�tt�CHES CRAIED N1TH CR44iTON 45 FDLLPXS�. � 4 N� �z C
� . .. � ....��LF 3 5.,0�0.55b c�p.JCHES(NG4�+til GL411ETER) 3 v�in
E: 13 IbB1.N . � . . -.- . . . . . .�.�. . ..- NIMMUAI STONE SIZE 4 1NCHE5 '�" �'��
v - wy �e�.00_ . OUTFALL Tp STREAM "'z
_ � .. . . ��EXSnMC C E RIPR�W Nw�NUA!pMCNSqNS �Y �� c��i
_ - - IE= 376.91 18'11� . � . ..O SECIqN-� � ''=
y - -_ �E= 71.61�18�E) ..W ' C�4TE{F�IC} 4CFr:. •'.��' VEnT. s'=5. . . -_PR^PO�ED � THICICNESS�2 FEfT
� � N: 1P9? 4B . . . .- -. " _ WID7H: DNAfEfFR +6 iFET OR 3 X Dw41tTR,
o _. _ . ��r ia'cvice o ossz�a+.e�c) _ __ o sccna�
,� - E: 1311 7.9' 3� WHKJ41'ER 6 GREATEq ` 1'��,�
;ENGTM: t2 fEET CR s �DAVE'ER, �PA, `ry
� � = 31&50(�8'V) � d
� n S „ � m .� n m .� YfH�HE4ER 5�FEtTER ��f� ,�s
` m'^ � �� � 9{ � � � � � =, .�ErKr: c.�ew4 . i ;fr Q .� � u
^"� s
� Y � -W
' �+ao z+oo a+oa s+eo ��,1- , �
- VERi1CAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON v� 9�OHSJ
� cm a rm+raa,rur�ae o�P,aFernn�T oF Pueuc woa�es ,�,` s_
� BENCHMARK � �t,�_� `a"`�.:�,��
�" +�►�j C I T Y C F DRAINACE FACILJTY SEC1101JS AND DETALS �o/os/so u
- rww ua�wEnr w us� ,R��' �� a„ � � COP?ERWOOD
ca+c uonia�r x/eaus naa o.a.. �� R E N TO N
o �+r++o�er o�,� 2 RENSm PER Cftt REV�N w�c ���is �r „� G�LIADRANT HOFAES .�
ser o.u�eaow cru�
_ GIY OF A�11fON CON'FAL ����. �� 1 RENSm PER CITY REV�EN BJT 1/15/IS BJi ��T ���� DATUlA p;anninq/3v�l�n P�bKc NoAcs pePt.
Porrr No.4�a e�=a��.m� 9� 14725 SE 36TH ST.SUffE 200
- c,u.v��uz1 ,,,p,,,,m�, o,,,� no. RensoN 9r oarE '':nPFa �a� s••�°•"�. BELLEWE, WA 98006
�air " 15"37
� A - NNNNAA
� OUTFALL AND 143RD ST IMPROVEMENTS
p FOF
° copP�Rwoa�
U
W -
—' PTN OF TNE NW1/4, OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15
LL �� TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAS7, W. M.
p•�� CITY OF RENTON, KINC COUNTY, STATE OF WASNINGTON
o s w zo
� - _ - .-,� . �
�
,:;\
o � \;�'.\�� � � �.s�3.�5(ia-� .
w � ?�e� ;�� �\ �•'� ,'`
; w fLPPl7 PAD PER 7 � '�,` �. � �
� a ����,_E, �5 ;���>, .� .� � ��.�
w d , ' ��'`✓� \ ^`. rt�u=-ca�oF
. •. ,��� - � � •-....... uc�ri. _ia.n
c Q i•..., ; 1 ` 1 �\ 7 ' '
♦ _ '
� U � � � -�!�� \ \ � "''W....,.. �� `
� � _ ._ _
� �` � � GEOiEXIM�.F/�B�C�WO
;y Sn ; , , ; , a; � a . \\ • r�,w*a 6e•:vu�� yeo
� � , . i i 1� s . UP TO 0307riARY•;H�.(i1 . .. ..... ... _. _...... . . .. ... . ._......._ . ._. . .. ..
+ �' '= . i : � -' . � N4iER U1RK �
.:, '..
, , '�n .4 ;::. � - ._ ''•� ��_
� � _ _
; � rti t ( .':i� e ` � -_� -l. ' \ � ' \ }. � .
� ' � �-�.� 5 �5` ���> _;, \. �c. � 37b _ _ .. ... .
i i I .�; . y, ��. , �� 71 . '
i � rt �. :i � '
� � z� k .� { , �> s_._ \ -, � s�a _. -- -'
' �� ta� ^ i � �:_ �- �1 \ i � .\ � _
��� �� . �_,� Y £ :-,l �t�� �yi, .�\ �_. . � . .� �_ ._. ...... . . ....._.. ._ . . ..... �'________ _____, ' .. ... .
. ,� •. \`
��` --�,s�,�-t� t y :.J�.-_S \\\ . � 370 ' �A9LC{MA(7Af7 1'W 103 ORT�..E
` ` --" � -=- �-. � GEOTEXTItE FABfdC i0 � — ..... . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . ... .. ... ......... EIXIAI)BF10'N Rf+RIP
��.�``` "_�__'_ "_ �'�`. _ \�� ��A1 W10�i �.50 . ONp¢rlu2!'HGH
� __. � �� �N°"T�� EL.373.75(18'J
` - ` w/oEeas enaa,�a
\.... ' D BWS
J:.iz•R,aw.a�o ` -------- ---_~ ...`� \�� `�� ..-�y ra�w ro ae x�o a�sroc SEC110N A-A
- -382' � - \�, �� � �• � SIOPE UP TO"cIEVATqN 576,25
-- �'s' - ; � � (r�r�aaown} DETENTION POND OUTFALL
., , \ -, ' - `,:� �
. ..� SCNL 1•�5.
. .� . . .;\\,`\ .
I ���.......� Q 0 10 Ztl �0
� N :.:�
M -
T- � ' �GS ' ���� _.'rJ'��` _ M���
_ . � � �-'•^" �- ^,s.= - CONT4ACTOR i0 UEPoFY UM:TS
�� - MYTN'16PECTOR Oi GAUO
AND OYERUY PRqR TO
CCHSTR41CfIDf1
� I � i
i
� I � � I
f � � � I � Ex WEa�D PowEa
�, . . .. � _ I I � .: y 1�A
' ---- ,,, -- �.,,��a,,,; . --��,: - —. , --�_;�_y — _ -,.I--- � - ----__ , --- � k�ti�
. • .;, �
, ;�.-' ; �- ---•- I, -• --• --- - - - - - ��!��' �'`�nF As��ycr
— — _
------ � i,• , — — -�'-- — . — — — '� t2'£�
, .....1
.
,
`
_._, , ' —
�:
EX R/1M :i
- "___ "_-_-"'"'" "".�.." "" ___' J _'-___ -_ _ -__� � ;`P ' —_ w _ _
� . ..
i- �
��' � .
��
, T- ...,'
• --- ` 159't ' . -
, . . ._...""""' "_ __ "' �""' _____""_" "' - _Z
I t
✓ ""'_ "__"__ ""'.... ....""'__ ' - �,
_ � i
""' "_
i �= W3F0 AVE 8E = -
� -- � ex*ov rmw -__ � ��.x Y��
� +� � . . . . .`_, �, _.. ._ . . ... ... _,. . ._ .:-..- _ _ __ _: .. - . 4- '�l�, g��
•- . .
.
, :�.,;1
' '
., � > :.._ _"_- -_ :. _ ; -; �st. a�
'----..._ _
a - _ - >
- --------m � ------ �- _ - - -� __ 'C'�'q� iac,
- --------- ---*n'---=—------- ------ ---- --- -----_--`-----•- --�--__- --•-- -
_ :. _„ .
X ^ - �
------ -------------
-'- ------
A�.'�lOWi0.Y 170 LF : .. . . --'--- ----'- -- -- -- ,-" '-' ---'' - -'--"'_' -- �' �:r ;
EP .,:�
a SOVfN 0�NiEFSECTqN_ � " E% OF R/N � . .... ._... . . �...�+:_.` .
� - _
`= YI1FH i1U P!SE .. .'--�- : . ..-.. ,. - _ _ _ _ ' � . � _._.... ...
_ � a��
. � ._..._. . .. -_ ... ��
� ' ,��
� —.:_ —---- - . - - - - - - ;' "`�r
� . � _ _ _
,.....� ................ : ... _ .... _
. .......... ...., ,... ..... x u
. .... `
.....� �
. ...... . . . ..
....:' .. HAL�STREEf GPoND RID � '' .. .
: .� . ,. � ...... . ._ . � ��
....
.......
..•.—�._s�- � :~ � '.
...
� ���� . ._ . .. ' . CYEPo.AY QONC fRqi7ACE � e .(: ....._ . ���f�Q� _. ....... ..-...... � \ ....�p.... p �in
\
�^ - � Oi PROPERTY. NEN'PAYEIENi � R �' . � .. . \ x 1
� � � TO Wdq/Exisiwc CRO�M. � - - - ,-:•'�/--�-------- �-1 .. - .. - - � ¢ ��
2 : Ai C]1TER Oi 1�71d1 AYE$ �.; . • / . �.�`� .�.�-' . Z �
m � ry AkD EAS?IYC EO(Y Oi PAYEYENi. � . . � .._-�...—�'--+ : \�• ' . N
j Ex R � � 56'33']fYf�97.D3• . /. . , : / � `��� �; _ `�...... .�, � '.. �` � q�i N(V p C
� � �- '., PUT BaJlICIRt / _ / . \ K�+....: , � �rn w o�o �s n
v � ; -: � � // , ,,+ � . � ..%� / '�i ... . ��\ `�\ � � \� '` ;�� N 1 I .wi"' ([
� Y
n � �, -' . � ".: . / �i.� .. � ..
\
a g � / . � / :� .;.� /� ;W .... ..;\��\\\ -\�. ` ��N N �2 C
/ ..�,rg'� //. . .37d . . . . \\ ' \ �� . ..\ �-N+ff � d
5 •� . � / �/ / � - t � � \ - \ \ � < �W N N
� � . / / . �/� . .S. .. �i . \ . \ �� . � � .- Y..�iv �V'i
- / . . - �'/ /�i�� . � . _� � _ . . \. ..
a . \ \ . �'��_\
F7t FlSFi 8)StRl�t � ,•,M�s
a �CCW_HOT_ � b
' coNia�cTOR swti�a+v.nc z w+s 4ct�a ro J� ' ''.v
E 143RD AVE SE HALF 5TREET OVERLAY Ta s���s�es���rNiu+c ovEaur��as � n
� Q �,:f-. _ W
/ _ _
s�� t•_�o� _
= VEF�i1CAL DAIUM ��'b'8 q�0�,5°� �
CRY OF REtdTON
� ClY OF R_l1TON,HA4D EB pEPAfiTMENT OF PVBUC WORK8 .
' BENCi-IMAF�C �" �+a.:�s �•ro°",,,•� ,; CI TY OF OUTFALL AND 143RD ST IMPFiOVEAIENTS ,o�oa�zo,• �
� COPPfftWOOD
� raHo voN�ev-%crs� �e. a�,� � V6t1_ NIA R E N TO N ry,��p� u^ p �
CONC YJNWENT W BRASS W0. � � -
�rnn'�o7 �7E RE�15ED PER GSY REV',EW FA� 3 JO 15 &'i pqTUM
SE7 0.65'HELON GtNDE � � WC VVf1VIV1�flV��7 w.c
on ov r�Ma+ca+nra ae�seo a�an Rcvinr E.T '�-•s/�s arr a/ nq/ P 14725 SE 36TH ST. S�T�E 20a
���r onie ' �� � aR�i Pio�r�n 9uitd P�blic Works De l.
_ PONT N0.NB EL�791.J76 �
_ �.�� �,z, ,,,��, ,�,� ��. R�,��oh �Y �,TE � u�.a�. eEu�wE, wA ssoos
_� � ""tfi `�'37
A — NNNNAA
W DRAINAGE FACILfTY DETAILS
p FOR
° � �m�u= ����� COPPERW40D
��.��, ��.
� �.
w �°� � � � ,4.,..,.;��.
� � „�,,,,,,e„�� PTN OF THE NWt/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15
� � �M��m�wiF�T�if@•� �aY���b
.�,�. � f'�.j""` � ./` .I s . .e. �r.d.
— ,„„��-� TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W.M. 1 `°""" '`'r t`,'1
_��...�.,.R _ .;,.� .:.-�-
CITY OF REM'ON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON .t. -=, ..?, �----�---
..� ..�,a... - ......r..
,! =_t_�`���- :,...._�......�
Q __ �.��...,,.d � ,: :,�,*..�.; ,,,,,_
--�✓'`mM.�.a�..ne. �i . �w.
O �t .'. �.a
raoc[w� �� ::�����i` �..•an.
� :_._ ws. - uW%::v�wen�.w y�Rr.+u+e �� uwv� \
R�C.1pKa 4MRM�mr�W�w�wW oaM
� w..` �
..y__.._�y_ �
i �
•�cf1oN wa
¢ w
z a �OCIq11Mlr]Nd+ Ye�.�RY!
L` i�—'_✓3y�~ nc��m .�� - u.a� '
W O 4 i
O � t
C U au�ov:�.� �xt' wi„ ;
trNet�aR�NarR�iUfau +nr xu�ls�Kclu�Yp � J �
�\ 1 _L 3_1 `•��f i
��:o... t— �r -
i
- - .�..�v— t
.�ro... ..a.,...� .... d.,..�
c....r.a.r.w.. __. __ �- 6
a w.,
m
[Mc�q .....�Sy_^K��.9'�M O ' Nr�
�— �¢aunoru nu o�A
/ `MwN
fi��
iLLTdI GC
IIOi6 Npna�
i.r+beecf b��rwu4�oeaee�+nM.�¢W ao��rehM�
f.Pt�enJys sM1 M+Mf a 31'6ril m IaJLM'JYW C!1 Mlxu�ici'tl'Jy.u�
• #m�6.wfsr�ylllt
'+MI'en a l'er_rrM��W9>l�1 raVaEw YwIe��C
�/Pa� � t.YWMa�Mandd��[WO�IwwYfdriluLMwMWSYQ�.
fXww�aOYA wM�V 1Joai k+PeAK 1NabYVLL M m.��sf b�s�tiMwrtiY.Imd.�r.bNPa���smv
11. �uAieOu�YJl��SKb��aVP���SIb�vJs.oalrWNJY lo/a�nla��wMt�M
u ��'Ya�M�elzW1W y�i'Y��•>mLL � �.1r�E4YerY�bwWtYdufVb+O�Fh�u4c�AMsiVM�ob
ss m�uv�/b��wefrlb�me/'e!/69Y+nw�pwm� �
'1 ♦ ,dq...�1bI^�M.w.srwetl�e++tlbWl�ml.�l� �
1 NM1S►�Wtrhvit�eNMaabia�0�lFilaW Nbm�v�YW7lI6rW �
Mw�r�R�i
�ID.�A-��.��
�� PUBIit�oBA3 TYlICAL DETEIiT10N PONO
DEPAA7lffNt 3EG770NS
WRCX?Doa �� i.'BIiC rOR1�4 OYERFLOW iTRUCTURE S7U.PLW-23�20
DEPAA7I�AT ����
:��.�,�>: �;. :t, --�r.....,
i
_ — -- � M'
�\` I
:� �� � —� .,. _....m...
,r rw�s�wea�w1ur TAG�klnsru�
'.V i� �YW�r��
, f �.,a,�.......>..W. '"'""° � Ponormwaler �..'_�.:�ti.,..::
� .."�'.��.:.'
r....�{' �,- te
'� ' , , � ,...,_�._._._...�... �����
r -� � �� -�- �
, .��� �.�
, I��: . � ! i-- � ----- - -
, � � ���.>.,..�: � � �¢�y�{ tAc,���$.i
' , � > �.��..es......_a��r. 0, .,.
j s ��:���,..�..�.. � - o
'°� :::r�...a� �x
I , Y I~ �....s.u�av.w�aoss.�e.�. •` a
I ' ( r�Mw�VV�a+.1rfMLo.
� y w..�.�,�.r�.a.v...... ; i < •ts23.�
i •1 ' � �aii..n.eo�..�. � a
�p
.r' ���+�.... I ^f'�J'C���l C�`i'.
� �•.; . �a. � ���...r�..e.a
X �-��F-�� /" '�.�j ����.«..c:�+�•.s'=:� SPEC�1CA7p71S:
5 • . ' r..��+err.+a.....�r.vrsuou.
� `� - :�" .rr.
��r__. - � .i� •••�.� r.+Ra+mw,.er Sina 6Blnde�br2�id�e� N
. \ '�� ./ . ,:'''°'.;.��-�,,,,:,,.�'^..«..'°".�",,,,� uac.nar. 0.�25�y+�7�aumwm � u
, � / m...
� : /.'� e.�Nw�n Fac� Nan-rslBclNa vinyl a 3 caeb a�doa e��ei(sP�Y�? �u
- ... �. �, � wM..�� o`��iii�i~ Ldtemy� Silkeaoenenamefw!wePasaLle.aviMlelEn�s = ��
. r. �„...,.enr.cv.r...w�r Ca011: Balp�biCMQvuM�balbems. � ✓'
� - +..����vw+•w.�•.��:n�ru 7yq aca Helveice eonduuad.THN;7 nd�SuaTiUx 1 J-ndK TorC 1 k�dc O�ax badar. N
� . !�.. ' . ..�w.rv.w,�tro..��`�` rrb barde�dbteroe b�n W �
, ,�� ._ _ �'e^...,Me�•F4w.� J e�5a�-4wfi:Mrat1;•kr.hhanAader. Z � �z
"' ��+w.c-awamuoivuorw.n o �.o..r..'v���. Pcsn: Resartsv�le47evdedY�pr.�•IrJ�Kphplhans4l
�i �.a r. ..c.:....a ....�...+ ..�.m.. Fcia9�lun: SewrsbchalnYntinceilavai4a.L'YiensseiroWMo�'Do�RA�� a�tv t� �& lT,
.e..w�.�.�s+.r�,�w.....a�.��...wa.�i..b..a... " u e`uwi•r^~�.+••�e.�r�.ep. rnNrmmQanat�wih9 s�a1Ce0.in�Ie0„Can 2ind�esirm�pioud�:ufam. Z T�� �W �
Rm.sea�+.�...�r...m�...v.mvw r • sr). tAap� Mpl+r
N s.�e `�"�.r:..evrv..���.....�y..a�..�..raa.'.�w � .m�..o....u..e •.s.. ((
„ �.+,:r1�...�...n......«�yw. �w. rr�ww�ti. �" w..e�r.ew..vwm. %� o pka�wAhA�6lsaldWuNNfrJ���eg ma�d+oles,�piwayY.p ac�earosd. cV�J)iA
' Mi a....��rrw+wnas�r.amn wam�+wC�e.QJ��rb�. '''^Ww v�M+�arrrJrvwov ^ G� Z�
r� rma.ru+�n+=+a��+w�.v o-ov�.�.�.�.•.n �
�a....�w.�. rr.....rrrrro�+vo'n. N .N-..N-.
E .. w��MF�..,ti.1NAcM.�.a�« �i d
m.�w+�•+�+�nw Hde:ll Ure kcA4'hw a Yrw fo�esNd i�'bo'bn dsfammmM.LM foWwvirp noM m�l ba edded fo ~�N
»,a,,.:..d,....�..�^..�.e u»r.o.dmo �nur —
r aa.+.+.a�.w.u..a� � ao�AybdnedtoP+a�CW�K9veRy.•7neDtlVla�+,sFod�r a0'-��v ��
r.ww+'.or..nwn-.+..rs r.Io.nefiv�abw/eheWwmusfhsaPdedtoMeDx4dtA� as klSx0onQ21. � Y....�. Uin �
� -1 M+awmICISSIO�il�6M[CSwO111M01VAYm � � ���
C �.�p�11L�aa1� �ls.
�ulOiSlR WMMwWKYLl�R�iC �/N
3 iuusiumiora�uxoaw�uart�c;w.oc riw.4n (�`i• o ,hI:1S6� `
- �y,tq-�.� I U1ND3CAPIN0.TnEE�. SID. f2wtl -^.a1-90 �,,��Sff��Z� 3[8.PWI-II v ,�� _
� .{"�}}�MCN1f� �OND G!O!lEMY AND � ?L:'IC lIOPo(3 PERMANlT 8URFACE WATER __ Q � �
1!����� fENCINO 3T4HnARD3 �[�UST 2012 ���T�-�T CONTROL POND SI6N 'i = - w
V Cf�' F'FBRU.�tY 2010
� = C.
d �d� ,� c
� CITY OF RENTON d'8 a co�5
�i' �EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKB
� �" "°"Z="�" ��"p'" � C I T Y 0 F �AGE FAGLIIY DETAILS i o�oe/2a i a
� ,..��. �,� � �,.: N/A COPPERWOOD �
s$ z „�,�o���TM P�„ R,,� ,.,�;.s' �,� ;� �� � REN TON UU�+A�D'RcANT HO�lyu�� s �/y� "� �
�� �,�
�i M�o��W M7E � REY75E0 PER C�.IY oMEW Bdl t �<;•c� 3.T � �� DATUM Plonnin9/B�ibinq/PuDI�C Wo�ks Uepl. �`T/GJ�G W� ST.�7N� Gw
�s ,vf7av�w wre N0. REV!SION BY DATE APPR � Y•,=.�e.a, �I I FVI� WA�BOO� �TI T`.37
� �
A - NNNNAA
W DRAINAGE FACILITY DETAILS
p �-m FOR
° �� ' COPPERT�VOOD
W �
-� -�——— - - —-----— -- -�-��--e'�—'`'�- PTN OF THE NW1/4,OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15
LL _. ._._. � � � TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COlAV1Y, STATE OF WASHINGTON
�...,..
.a..�..
❑
p --- ——— -- —�---
O
� ------- --�-- ------- -- ---- ---a--- ---
w �
ga ,...�...�,..
W a
a O �...d..._..a.. �'��...M�..�..,....��..
�..v
°""�` STORMFlLTER DESIGN TABLE
:r
�ne
�Y 41i DM41F�Wti1114�0YN�i1ilY�]6lbS0i Wt�IO�MNu QYf�U 1E3nE6 �I �M f�v iFNt A�FM9a�STOMl«En 11EA1YElIf GPIOiY vM06�v CM1�0�OOIrMOlDG1TMAtl�YF1�MF/1
i uRfWIR�tO�iLWiY�RfltY VEE61Cf101YMTEOFNIWMlYN1CfCN�Oi�TOEOkIOY�ED�YW[iE61011EpOR
��a pE��� �TE FFM O�ER9OII STp4ql1F11�!�VNIMILMA tUT tl4fT W S�O�M1011 qP4 MEi OOMIf.IMIOI
l N.iLW�RR1'�TOTQRC1pA'�Q*10(��OUMi1AY�1M�WOlOf�O1RCM�ltU�. �M1IMlTfNOM9IMLl�fSBllYP11WDED�VObRE0i1MES101IFJ1WgMDTER
♦ VTIIOQAlNiCFtYNMi„IMIw�%[P1MW�OMIMMOLt001WC0�61MON1YRMl�tlO�tOPt KETMY �,r I� CMR10G!'H9rt St 1r Wwd10'
MflC�lo�M�lq V�1MIOidL
a- ru im u �.�
• wi�vw.oroa�eraonEnwvM.nnwn�o�aw.aartswr.�wwem.E�mcr. I aor aar ln
a r..«xrr�va+ci�wnKo�ws�rarancrwmcuoc.an� --i=��_��_��-� 1 nun�raum�nwat�ww : + : +pwr
x w,.��.�.�.�.,o.�..�.�o��m. -��_���r�=r� 1 I ^°"' a� n.a n ra w s
a n�rluwssc�axawu�a�rawruwtsssr� � \ 7t �C � 1
• wiow.wawumaRrmnsroncaw�caoAwrcu�nacwo.�aonar�cnncricu � � j.._� '� !� �� �� � �
s�ouoerwE.�.wt.�.c.tna.r.earamfra��nn+o.one�wacm.tcva f- 1'- if 1� Y �
� � � �- � SITE SPECIFIC
h- I I p_ I���->���>�����>T-�� j � DATARE(]UIREMENTS
�, ne�or�"aw I C L���"�-r�-Y-�a�- I ��Tucn�io ffn
� � '� r %r '7� / •.�\\ Enw�unnowa.rEa.� 4r
���ly��l��l� !� \ O�.�. . O PFN(RQ.YMTE{d�l 211
I ���S 1 �r�—r �' � �. '.�.� � \ �� NE'VWFEqDUOiPfM(RAY 1 1�
,�.,,,,,-n„o � rrZ�7� �C �� �� .wvn�wocesrEar� a
,� Pt,'BUC 10Y1B FROr-T.SHEAR GATE OETAIL / �-> �-f �-! � �-� � � wnroocc nnw nw*[ �3
ntr�ana�r � �I �� r 1r' �f- �f 1 � j Q C�HTEGH g �Ea.rwe��PEnu� e:
�wacx zom �t�� �- � � I
1L=�r-�r-��� ��=--J . rsewu �E raewa ouwt�a
� _ � `-� � .. irn>re >nu oB ir
-��'. �.. ameiAae vau va ir
amar w �_ -j� nnw�o.uv �i°� \� .���� ur w�na� �
x.� wrn+tor�noMwu�a �aowr
�.."�"'•.. �
� ,,d,^� -�,'"""''" PLAN FRAME AND COVER '�""�
�qau�rFa vu�s)
qw'[Mn N.T.S
CQ'OIf�11 O�A
F
.=�.w anraEwoa.a�a
�Y��� �~ R�16SI ���L vFA�O�WwCE5VE4�KA10M
� i�++le.rr R�EAGM1pGE4lwl1BEY�MILm.I�8ShE5pMMACRMI�tM[VLRPM.MOSBlQbYMf pOi1LYf➢N
-..-___ DEYRISIWLBE1.IbE1.1RT9yF3MCOMfICfiYE9Ml1�E�TlbW]tSE00�0{.
� � �'�`� SVE�IC0.GMMTESWa1lE 2GN1'ff WqtM.�CRGrMlEp111EtF/1/lEOF11EflO�IFMYI�F��'/TE
� M9MYJIF�(DlfIiLTNFA1Sl�A�M�UGHTRL0.ONM1EMMIE�9��6�IEi711PWIM�I
Y�s
— �M /M� ____ _____�_��_ ____ C�ULr�OfES
� ��, �, �aa�I ( � s�s ,.faxna�.ornoKfui�..�en.asweasw�onw�r.
r/ i u�19�0�wa�Min��IwvEarsEJB1�w16�9QIi�ctura01Hoo1nwrwM.
Z �� 3 ransiaNuna+w�nwswn�o[rNimamununeaieaow�wowewrlwa�towuer�awWMra�o�
l� _` I I � ramEmn�mc....c.r.eEa�
�••�••a+• 4 ����~' ^.1 � I I � a s.onur�hnww�rfl+owuns*wcrwEawvaen�«.n�w.awix.uooa�n.uworwwwmcavrwx�
..r. N.......w. � w*nsaa�,.�cco.nz�no�.ocanrws*nucTw[uffiauaie.aasaw�a�c �TA(
^��� �� �/J I `�l" i s srn�cn�suai�r�rto�+su�oro nwn�c wsswi+c uarMco��of s-s iwoc�outwR�atv�na�wr, � K�
4 � 6 I 1�r�1f��r��� �f oa enon.nE wner rsE r�rr nFv�now aa�oF ramw romsw��cnw ewa�ow�ta nav�no� 0�p���ty,NC�,
usn�rssiuu.�rw�sMowro�voecusrhr*MnEm+.Eoiiaoa `��o 0
� .��++.r..� . v ( �I 1 Y Y II I I ws,..unawrea o Z
..�r�� S € p �I I I 1 1 1 q w•rersle.a�s�e.r�cuocvrK�waonwmslor�na+ww+9ouNane-sr[weoeaa�wuouwnwewm .+
� id M �- . � - - �- - - I Swlt BE SPE�RFD Br FHq�FER OF PEW1O.
4 COM1MCrvtloAlaPEEaWUEwiM�asRQ��innGwo�EAWaManioliTMOlETMS�OYR101
i L t��� � ����� --J smucn,�w.�w�n,noFs rro�a "� q �t su p �,Q
� wa�we mm��iacrwww�ow�[.r�isT�.wc�a�irKa�w rv�[�wn��erronml Ffr��lS1Ca��l�`
% /r�M MIEIf�E t�R� �'�'� E car�.nwrov+��rvnvw•�e�.omorectrwer�oceannrm�w�nua+�tme�m�iuors. roXAI ��
\ ��� RO�w1 ' c.anrtlllnwro�ao.FnEnW�fEwMnEmuaw�B�nEafTBlepalOMaa�!
� � �; ' E�vnnoN N
� �..w�.�..r.u•e.+.nro /y�� = ti c�
,, „„�R,,,,,,�,a,,,� � y ` VY�C� THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STORMFlLTER p ��
�' . �w,�� `� '�',.'^ .r....a..'. s:�.;r�:cr� ew�a4 tow�a►s uc 8'x 14'PEAKANDARD ETAIORMFlLTER j ��
:.r...e. Y
d ` w��t v � / �w�M�� _ _ ' Z � W
�
�w�wV�r�4�w� W N � �
c�.�r.�irv rl�ti � Q�fV� c��
OD N 1� $3�
l ,wJr'.M.b.aw.A. Z ��� W�.=i
N A.:WJe�sIw��I� fV�^
C en.....�..a.�r.r. ^ 3 v��n c�i�
: � n.r.�►�wr.�ao�o.r.+m.+..�rse�.a
w��il.�tJ�aOy � N N y=j
- lmYVlo�ybl4e�rl�mYA�������wt �IL�1f1
Ei r..rWrMr.�w.ti.w.�n.a.o�rw.rwa. tV 2 N N $
i.e�..�..wnrw��r.r�..w aD Y v..~.. c�u�l
�
_ �N '�'"�s
g ",�
� J �'_-
�
� � PUBIJC�OWC9 fLOw RESTRiCTOR �'�x-�m = � _w
n � D�AIi71(F].T OIL rOLlVT10N GONTROL �N�e � v
o �� b = �
� CITY OF RE(VTON b8 '`°"S� �
� oEr,awr�errr oF Pue�ic wowca
�: �.�,�
� .R,,,,ma � � ,�'W; .""""` ""�», �t► ' CI TY OF DRANA�FA�C�D AII.S ,o/oe/ao„
f M7q�mM Ga 2 RENSm PER qtt RENEI� RAC 3 30II5 &IT °M�py�, -- _ RENTON oUADRANT HOIuIES "�
arew
� �aruu 14725 SE 36TF'�3T SUITE Z00
�� �R��n, � 1 REVISED PER ptt REVEII BR � t5/IS BJT � i ,�,,,,��� Plonn�nq/Buitdrg/Public Workt Dept.
�� „�K a,e ►w. rtElnsar+ er wTE �t � "'�'�""" Fia � FM IF,WA 9800G '"`te '37
A - NNNNAA
KCRTS Detention
Facility Calculations
SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS
ST 1.0/
ST1.1 � ST1.0 LA0.8 LA0.9 LA1.0 LA1.2
(�r-J _� � . SNOMONISN COUNTY
� % �' KING COUNTY
CJ i ''� b
�
� �
P ' r E, t ��
� �
_ K �o
J 1 � , ����I
' `� \
� 'i
- � - ��
� � �
� : _� Q
� _ ._� ;�-/ � .'a "
�
L � � �
i e = �%-
ER1M i t� -.-
Say I - ; I � � `
I� � � _ _ _ °""h `_'���, �
� I E E � _ `,�_ . ' \
C
, ��-�,. � ,�,,,,
, � -
', .Y� ;Z_
1 `, �/'/� , r _
�(J\'/ � �
/�1/'� GM �
`S � - '�y ^, �. PON! .6.
� EJ��� ��
/� T, '�
� ,�,� �;� �� o ri.a .
(��, � �� .�,a f \ '..
� ' �� - - p` �---�� � � �i:�
, ` p �
. �
) _-'
� / � / .�,a. \
� ' �, LANDSBURG
Q �- 0
( �,
...�� ,: � � ,,
nma -
e 1 Q
- � n
r��� �( ' ' ' \� �..�
so��e —_ l qn
Q � � �- �� ra
`^�� r. C7
1 ; � � � � \ -
'� � �
� � D � .
e � '
ST 1.1 � � =,
- „ � ,
� o
VIERCE COUNT♦ '\ -
ST 1.0 ,�
a
Rainfall Regions and �o$ � �
Q
Regional Scale Factors �A o.s ,�.--�'
�Tii Incorporated Area
LA 1.0 LA 1.2
�e� River/Lake
Major Road
1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual
3-22
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series �
------------------------
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea-Tac
Computing Series ; 16834pre.tsf
Regional Scale Factor : �.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File �
Loading Time Series
File:C:\KC SWDM\KC DATA\STTFbOR.rnf .
Till Forest 9. 90 acres
Total Area : 9.90 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.799 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year S
Storing Time Series
File: 1683�pre.tsf .
Time Series Computed
KCRTS Cammand
CREATE a new Time Series
------------------------
Producticr_ of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea-Tac
Co�rnuting Series : 16834dev.tsf
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Tirne Series File
Loading Time Series
File:C:\KC SWDM\KC DATA\STTG60R.rnf .
Till Grass 3.94 acres
Loading Time Series
File:C: \KC SWDM\KC DATA\STEI60R.rnf .
?mpervious 5.87 acres
--------------
Total Area : 9.81 acres
Peak Discharge: 3 .b1 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 6
Stor�ng Time Series
File:16834�ev.tsf _
Tir�e Series Computed
KCRTS Command
CREAT�, a netv Time Series
------------------------
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea-Tac
Computing Series : 16834bypass.tsf
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series
File:C:\�C S�DM\KC DATA\STEI60R.rn- .
Impervious 0.09 acres
Total Area : 0.09 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.043 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series
File: lo834bypass_tsf .
Time Series Computed
KCRTS Command
eXit KCRTS Program
------------------
�Paused-Flow Freyuenry-KCRTS o O E3 �
0
Retum Period
2 5 10 20 50 100
��� 0 16834rdoutpks in Sea-Tac
♦ 16834dsout.pks
0 16834dev.pks
N
0
� p ♦
4 p 0
U� 0
� o
U
m .
v� �p�
co
t
�
� �
R
N
� �
�
�
.
a 00
0
�o�'
1 2 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 99
CumuNative Probability
�Pauxd-Duration Analysis-KCRTI o l�l LS ;
n
° 16834rdout.dur o
• 16834dsout.dur ♦
16834tar.dur o
�
0
I R
�
0
�
N �
� o
�
m
m
�
co
t
� y M
( D �
i
N
O
�
O
I
O
O 0
10 5 10� 10�3 10�2 10�� 1Q�
Probabilit�r Ezceedence
3e�enticn/�etentior Fac-litv
Type of Facility: Detenticr_ Po:.d
Side Slope: 3.00 I::_V
Pond Bottom Length: 155.00 �t
Pond Bottom Widkh: 68.a0 =t
Pond Bottom Area: 10540. sq. ft
Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 23548. sa. ft
0.541 acres
Effective Storage Depth; 7.00 ft
Stage 0 Elevation: 377.00 ft
Storage Volume: 1106?7. cu. ft �-- v�1�wtC. �eq,u:�`e�.
2.541 ac-f_
Riser Head: 7.00 ft
Riser Diameter: 18.00 inches
Number of orifices: 2
Full Head Pipe
Orifice � Height Diameter Discharge Diameter
{ft) {in) (CFS} (in)
1 0.00 1.50 0.161
2 4.90 3.00 0.354 6.0
Top Notch Weir: ncne
Outflow Ratir.g C•.:rve: Kcne
Stage Elevat'_en Stcrage Discharae Percolation Sur` Psea
(ft} (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs} (sq. Tt)
0.00 377.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 10540.
�.02 377.02 211. 0.005 O.00B 0.00 10567.
! 0.03 377.03 317. 0.007 0.011 0.00 10580.
, 0.05 377.05 529. 0.012 0.013 0.00 10607.
O.Ob 377.06 635. 0.015 0.015 0.00 10620.
0.08 377.08 8�8. 0.019 0.017 0.00 10647.
, 0.09 377.09 954. 0.022 0.019 0.60 Z0661.
0.11 377.11 1168. 0.027 0.020 0.60 10688.
O.i3 377.13 1382. 0.032 0.022 O.QO 10715.
0.24 377.24 2568. 0.059 0.030 0.06 lOSb3.
0.36 377.36 3892. 0.089 0.037 0.00 11026.
0.48 377.48 5215. 0.120 0.042 0.00 1119_.
0.60 377.60 6567. 0.151 O.a47 0.00 11356.
0.72 377.72 7940. 0.182 0.052 0.00 11522.
0.84 377.84 4333. 0.214 0.056 0.00 11b89.
0.9& 377.96 10746. 0.247 0.060 0.00 11858.
1.07 378.07 Z2058. 0.277 0.063 0.00 12013.
1.19 378.19 Z3510. 0.310 0.067 0.00 12183.
1.31 378.31 14982. 0.344 0.070 0.00 12355.
1.43 378.43 16475. 0.378 0.073 0.00 12527.
1.55 378.55 17989. 6.413 4.07b 0.00 12700.
1.67 378.67 19523. 0.448 0.079 0.00 12875.
1.79 378.79 21079. 0.484 0.082 0.00 13050,
1.90 378.90 22523. 0.517 0.084 0.00 13212.
2.02 379.02 24119. 0.554 0.087 0.00 13390.
2.14 379.14 25737. 0.591 0.089 0.00 13568.
2.26 379.26 27376. 0.628 0.092 0.00 13748.
2.38 379.38 29036. 0.667 0.094 Q.00 13928.
2.50 379.50 30719. 0,705 0.096 0.00 14110.
2.62 379.62 32423. 0.744 0.099 0.00 14293.
2.74 379.74 34149. 0.784 0.101 0.00 14476.
2.85 379.85 35751. 0.921 0.103 0.00 14646.
2.97 379.97 37519. 0.861 0.105 0.00 14831.
3.09 380.09 39310. 0.902 0.107 0.00 15018.
�
3.21 380.21 4I124. 0.944 0.109 O.OQ 15206.
3.33 380.33 42960. 0.986 0.111 0.06 15395.
3.45 380.45 44819. 1.029 0.113 0.06 15585.
3.57 380.5? 46700. 1.072 0.115 0.00 15775.
3.68 38d.68 48445. 1.112 0.117 0.00 15951.
3.86 380.80 50371. Z.156 0.119 0.00 16144.
3.92 380.92 52320. 1.201 0.121 0.00 16338.
4.04 381.04 54292. 1.246 0.123 0.00 16533.
4.16 381.16 56288. 1.292 0.124 0.00 16729.
4.28 381.28 58307. =.339 0.126 O.OQ 16926.
4.40 381.40 60350. ?.385 0.128 0.00 17124.
4.51 381.51 fi2244. 1.429 0.130 0.00 17307.
4.63 381.63 64333. 1.477 O.I31 0.00 17507.
4.75 381.75 66445. 1.525 O.Z33 Q.00 17708.
4.87 381.87 68582. 1.574 0.135 0.00 1791Q.
4.90 381.90 69120. 1.587 0.135 0.00 17961.
4.93 381.93 69660. 1.599 0.13B 0.00 18�11.
4.96 381.96 70241. I.612 0.145 0.00 18062.
4.99 381.99 70744. 1.624 0.157 0.00 18113.
5.03 382.03 71470. 1.641 0.173 0.00 18181.
5.06 382.06 72016. _.653 0.193 0.00 18232.
5.09 382.49 72564. 1.666 0.217 0.00 18283.
5.12 382.12 73113. 1.678 0.243 0.00 18334.
5.15 352.15 73664. 1.691 0.261 0.06 18386.
5.27 382.27 7�882. 1.742 0.288 0.00 18591.
5.39 382.39 78126. 1.794 0.312 �.Od 18798.
5.51 382.51 80394. 1.846 0.333 0.06 19005.
5.62 382.62 82495. 1.894 6.353 0.00 19147.
5.74 382.74 84811. 1.947 0.370 0.00 194Q6.
5.86 382.86 871�2. 2.001 0.387 0.00 19617.
5.98 382.98 89519. 2.055 G.403 0.00 19824.
6.20 383.10 91911. 2.110 0.418 0.00 20041. '
6.22 383.22 94329. 2.165 0.432 0.00 20255.
6.34 383.34 96773. 2.222 0.446 0.00 20470. i
6.46 383.46 99242. 2.278 0.459 0.00 20685. i
6.57 383.57 101528. 2.332 0.472 0.00 20885.
6.69 383.69 104047. 2.389 0.485 0.00 21102.
6.81 383.81 106593. 2,447 0.497 0.00 21321.
6.93 383.93 109165. 2.506 0.508 0.00 2154Z.
7.00 384.40 110577. 2.541 0.515 0.00 21670.
7.10 384.10 112$53. 2.541 0.987 O.QO 21855.
7.20 384.20 115C48. 2.641 1.840 0.00 22040.
7.30 384.30 117261. 2.692 2.940 0.60 22226.
7.40 384.40 119493. 2.743 4.250 0.00 224'_3.
7.50 384.50 121744. 2.795 �.730 0.00 22600.
7.60 384.60 124013. 2.847 7.160 0.00 22788.
7.70 384.70 126301. 2.899 7.700 Q.00 22977.
7.80 384.80 128609. 2.952 8.200 0.00 23167.
7.90 384.90 130935. 3.006 8.670 0.00 23357.
8.00 385.00 133280. 3.060 9.110 O.flO 23543.
8.10 385.10 135644. 3.114 9.540 0.00 237�0.
8.20 385.20 138028. 3.169 9.940 0.00 23932.
8.30 385.30 14Q431. 3.224 10.330 0.00 24'�25.
8.40 385.40 142853. 3.279 10.700 0.00 2a319.
8.50 365.50 145295. 3.336 Z1.060 0.00 24514.
8.60 385.60 147756. 3.392 i1.410 0.00 24709.
8.70 385.70 150237. 3.449 11.750 0.00 24905.
8.80 385.80 152737. 3.50b 12.080 0.00 25102.
8.90 385.90 155257. 3.564 12.400 0.00 25306.
Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage
Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) {Ac-Ft)
1 3.61 2.29 7.24 384.24 115953. 2.662
2 1.77 0.51 7.00 384.00 110618. 2.539
3 2.14 0.44 6.27 383.27 95387. 2.196
_ 4 1.78 Q.44 6.31 383.31 96209. 2.209
' S 1.88 0.33 5.46 382.48 79889. 1.834
6 1.11 0.17 5.03 382.03 71404. 1.639
7 Z.43 0.13 4.44 381.44 61047. 1.401
8 1.54 0.11 3.26 380.26 41959. �.963
Hyd R/D Facility Tributary Reservoir POC Outflcw
Outflow Inflow Inflow Target Calc
1 2.29 6.04 ******** ******* 2.31
2 0.51 o.aa ******** 0.63 0.52
3 0.44 O.Q3 ******** ******* 0.44 fe - �� ��Ca�r
4 0.44 0.02 ******** ******* 0.45
5 0.33 Q.02 ******** ******* 0.33
6 0.17 6.01 ******** �*+**** 0.17�irr-�' �-^ YCO'�
7 0.13 0.02 ******** **�**** 0.13
8 0.11 0.02 *x****** **�**** 0.12
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility �
Inflow Time Series File:I6834dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:16834rdout
POC Time Series File:lb834dsout
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Di.scharge: 3.b1 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Outflow Discharge: 2.29 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Reservoir Stage: 7.24 Ft
Peak Reservoir Elev: 384.24 Ft
Peak Reservoir Storage: 115953. Cu-Ft
. 2.062 AC-Ft
Add Time Series:16834bypass.tsf
Peak Summed Discharae: 2.30 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Point of Compliance File:16834dsout.tsf
Flow Frequency Analyeis
Ti:ne Series File:16834rdout.�sf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
iCFS) (CFS) (ft) Period
0.660 2 2/09/O1 20:00 2.2° 7.24 1 100.00 0.990
0.130 7 1/07/02 4;00 0.6b� 7.03 2 25.OQ 0.960
G,438 4 3/06/03 22:00 0.443 6.31 3 10.00 6.900 '
�.110 B 8/26/04 7:00 0.438 6.27 4 5.Q0 0.800
�.172 6 1/08/05 3:00 0.328 5.48 5 3.00 0.667
�.328 5 1/19/06 O:CO 0.172 5.03 6 2.00 0.500
�.443 3 11/24/06 B:^u0 Q.130 4.49 7 1.30 0.231
2.29 1 1/09/08 10:00 0.J.10 3.26 S 1.16 0.091
Computed Peaks 1.75 7.19 50.Ot} 0.980
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:16834dsout.tsf p���� pG (`��t,wnCG
Pro;:ect Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Pea3c Flow Rates--- -----F1ow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
{CFS) (CFS) Period
0.654 2 2/09/O1 20:00 2.31 1 7.00.00 0.990
0.133 7 1/66/02 3:00 0.664 2 25.00 0.960
6.441 4 3/bb/03 21:00 O.e46 3 10.fl0 0.900
G.?22 8 S/2b/�4 2:00 0.�41 4 5.00 0.800
0.173 6 1/Ofi/05 3:OG 0.330 5 3.00 0.667
0.330 5 1/18/66 23:00 0.173 6 2.00 0.500
0.446 3 11/24/06 7:04 0.133 7 1.30 0.231
2.31 1 1/09/OB 10:00 0.122 8 1.10 0.091
Comp��ted Peaks 1.76 50.00 0.980
F1ow Duration from TiTe Series File:lb834rdout.tsf
Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Sxceedence_Probability
Cws � � $
u.009 32532 53.053 53.653 46.947 0.469E+00
�.028 6671 10.879 63.932 36.C68 0.361E+00
0.047 6012 9.864 73.736 26.264 0.263E+00
0.065 5202 8.483 82.220 17.780 0.17BE+00
0.084 4840 7.893 90.113 9.887 0.989E-01
0.102 2452 3.999 94.111 5.889 0.589E-01
0.121 1928 3.144 97.255 2.745 0.274E-01
0.139 1299 2.118 99.374 0.626 0.626E-02
0.158 42 0.668 99.442 0.558 0.558E-42
0.177 42 0.668 99.511 0.489 0.4898-02
0.195 21 0.034 99.545 0.455 0.455E-02
0.214 13 0.�21 99.566 0.434 0.434$-02
0.232 14 0.023 99.589 0.411 0.411E-02
0.251 9 Q.015 99.604 0.396 0.396g-02
0.269 21 0.034 99.638 0.362 0.362E-02
4.288 37 0.060 99.698 0.302 0.3025-02
0.307 21 0.034 99.733 0.267 0.267E-02
0.325 30 0.049 99.761 0.219 0.219E-02
0.344 22 0.036 99.617 0.183 0.183E-02
0.362 12 0.020 99.837 0.163 0.163E-02
Q.381 15 0.024 99.861 0.139 0.1395-02
6.399 14 0.023 99.884 0.116 Q.116E-02
0.418 14 0.023 99.907 0_493 Q.930E-03
0.437 16 0.026 99.933 0.067 Q.669E-03
0.455 15 0.024 99.958 0.042 0.424E-03
�.474 10 0.016 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03
0.492 4 0.007 99.980 0.020 0.196E-03
0.511 7 0.011 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04
0.529 3 0.005 99.997 0_003 0.326�-04
��,548 0 0.000 59.997 0.403 0.326E-04
0.567 D 0.000 99.997 0.603 0.326E-04
��.585 0 0.060 99.997 0.603 0.326E-04
0.604 1 O.OQ2 99.998 0.602 0.163fi-04
0.622 0 O.OQO 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04
0_641 0 O.OQO 99.99B 0.002 0.163E-64
0.659 0 0.000 99.998 0.062 0.163E-C4
Flow Duration from Time Series File:16834dsout.tsf
Cutoff Count Frequency CD? Exceedence_probability
CFS � � g
0.609 32521 53.035 53.035 46.965 0.470E+00
0.028 6595 10.755 63.790 36.210 0.362E+0��
0.047 6040 9.850 73.640 26.360 0.264E+G��
0.066 5142 8.386 82.025 17.975 0.180E+00
0.084 4690 7.975 90.afl0 10.000 O.100E+00
0.103 2487 4.056 94.056 5.944 0.594E-�1
0.122 1913 3.120 97.175 2.825 0.282E-01
0.140 1330 2.169 99.344 0.6�6 0.656E-0�:
��.159 63 0.103 99.447 0.553 0.553E-0�
0.178 39 O.Q64 99.511 0.489 0.489E-G�
0.196 21 0.034 99.545 0.455 0.455E-G:�.
0.215 14 0.023 99.568 0.432 0.432E-0:' '
0.234 13 0.021 99.589 0.411 0.411E-0�
�5� In n,ni� qc �n� n ,�g� O.�q�•_
0.271 20 �.�33 99.638 G.362 0.362E-02
fl.290 36 C.�59 99.697 0.303 0.303E-02
0.308 22 C.036 99.733 0.267 0.267E-07.
�.327 32 0.052 99.785 0.215 0.215E-02
0.346 20 0.033 99.817 0.183 0.183E-02
0.364 12 0.020 99.837 0.163 0.163E-0?
0.383 15 0.024 99.861 6.139 0.139E-C�
0.402 13 0.021 99.883 0.117 0.117E-C�
0.421 14 0.023 99.905 0.095 0.946E-03
0.439 15 0.024 99.930 0.070 0.701E-03
0.458 I7 0.028 99.958 0.042 0.424E-03
0.477 9 0,015 99.972 0.028 0.277E-0�
0.495 5 0.008 99.480 0.020 0.196E-0.-�
0.514 7 0.011 99.992 0.0�8 0.815E-Ot
0.533 3 O.Q05 �9.957 0.0��3 0.326E-C�1
0.551 6 O.Q00 99.947 O.D03 0.326E-C�
0.570 0 0.000 99.997 0.003 0.326E-C4
0.589 0 0.000 99.997 0.003 0.326E-0�1
0.607 1 0.002 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04
0.626 0 4.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-0�
0.645 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04
0.653 0 0.000 99.958 0.0�2 0.163F.-C�t
Duration Comparison Anayi.,
Base File: 16834pre.ts'
New File: 16834dsout.
Cutoff Units: Disc^arge i__ _.:�
-----Fraction o*" Tir.i2----- ---------Check of Tolerance-------
Cutoff Base New °sChange Prob�bility Base New gChange
0.140 I 0.91E-02 G.6bE-02 -27.3 � 0.91E-02 0.140 0.135 -3.7
0.177 � 0.62E-�2 0.49E-02 -20.8 � 0.62E-02 0.177 0.145 -18.3
0.214 � 0.48�-02 Q.43E-62 -9.8 j 0.48E-02 0.214 0.185 -13.6
0.252 � 0.363-02 0.40E-02 9.9 1. 0.36E-02 0.252 0.270 7.3
0.289 � 0.28E-02 0.30E-02 7.5 j 0.28E-02 0.289 0.301 4.Q
0.326 � 0.22E-02 0.22E-02 1.5 i 0.22E-02 0.326 0.327 0.2
0.363 I 0.15E-02 0.16E-02 13.5 � 0.15E-02 0.363 0.380 4.5
0.401 I 0.998-03 0.128-02 19.7 � 0.99E-03 0.401 0.417 4.1
0.438 I 0.62E-03 0.72E-03 15.8 � 0.62E-03 0.438 0.442 0.8
0.475 � 0.34E-03 0.285-63 -19.0 � 0.34E-03 0.475 0.467 -]..7
0.513 ! 0.21E-03 0.98E-G4 -53.8 � 0.21E-03 0.513 0.493 -3.9
0.550 � 0.16E-03 0.33E-04 -80.0 � 0.16E-03 0.550 0.501 -8.9
0.587 � 0.98E-04 0.33E-04 -66.7 � 0.98E-04 0.587 0.513 -12.7
0.624 � 0.16E-04 0.168-04 0.0 I 0.16E-�4 0.624 0.664 6.3
Maximum positive excursion = 0.021 cfs { 8.2$}
occurring at 0.256 cfs on the Base Data:16834pre.tsf
and at 0.277 cfs on the New Data:16834dsout.tsf
Maximum negative excursion = 0.036 cfs (-19.3�)
occurring at 0.169 cfs o*� the Base Data:lb834pre.tsf
and at 0.152 cfs on the New Data:16834dsout.ts�
16834pre.pks I
Flow Frequency Analysis I
Time Series File:16834pre.tsf P�� `��`�o�R'
Project �ocation:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak F1ow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peal<s - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.625 2 2/09/O1 18:00 0.799 1 100.00 0.990
0.17Q 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.625 2 25.00 0.960
Q.463 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.480 3 10.00 0.900
U.016 8 3/24/04 20:00 0.463 4 5.00 0.800
0.275 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.404 5 3.00 0.667
0.480 3 Z/18/06 21:00 0.275 6 2.00 0.500
0.404 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.170 7 1.3Q 0.231
0.799 1 1/09/08 9:d0 0.016 8 1.10 0.091
Computed Peaks 0.741 50.00 0.980
Page 1
16834bypass.pks
Flow Frequency Analysis
Ti me Seri es Fi 1 e:16834bypass.tsf Qj�PaSS
ProjeCt LOCation:5ea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flo�v Frequency Analysis-------
Flow ►zate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.022 7 2/09/O1 2:00 0.043 1 100.00 0.990
0.�19 8 1/OS/02 16:00 0.033 2 25.00 0.960
0.027 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.027 3 10.00 0.900
0.0�2 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.027 4 5.00 0.800
0.027 4 10/28/04 ].6:00 0.023 5 3.00 0.667
0.023 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.022 6 2.00 0.500
0.033 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.022 7 1.30 0.231
0.043 1 1/09/08 6:00 d.019 8 1.10 0.091
Camputed Peaks 0.039 50.00 0.980
i
�,
'. ,!
�
Page 1
16834dev.pks
Flow Frequency Analysis
Ti me se ri es Fi 1 e:16834dev.tsf O���P��'
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
F1oUr Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
1.77 6 2/09/O1 2:00 3.61 1 100.00 0.990
1.43 8 1/05/0� 16:�0 2.23 2 25.Od 0.960
2.].4 3 2/27/03 7:00 2.14 3 10.00 0.900
1.54 7 8/26/04 Z:00 1.88 4 5.00 0.800
1.85 5 10/28/04 16:00 1.85 5 3.00 0.667
1.88 4 1/18/06 16:00 1.77 6 2.00 0.500
2.23 2 10/26/06 0:00 1. 54 7 1.30 0.231
3.61 1 1/09/08 6:00 1.43 8 1,10 0.091
Computed Peaks 3.15 50.00 0.980
Page 1
16834rdout.pks I�
Flow Frequency Analysis �� p��lt
Time series File:16834rdout.tsf �
Project Location:Sea-Tac ,
---annual �eak Flow Rates--- -----�low Frequency Analysis-------
Flo�a Rate Rank Time af Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) (ft) Period
0.660 Z 2/09/O1 20:00 2.29 7.24 1 100.00 0.990
0.130 7 1/07/02 4:00 0.660 7.03 2 25.00 0.960
0.438 4 3/06/03 22:00 0.443 6.31 3 10.00 0.9fl0
4.110 8 8/26/04 7:00 0.438 6.27 4 5.00 0.800
0.172 6 1/08/05 3:00 0. 328 5.48 5 3.00 0.667
0.328 5 1/19/06 0:00 0.172 5.03 6 2.00 0.500 ',
0.443 3 11/24/06 8:00 0.130 4.49 7 1.30 0.231
2.29 1 1/09/08 10:00 0.110 3.26 8 1.10 0.091
Computed Peaks 1.75 7.19 50.00 0.980
Page 1
16834dsout.pks
Flow Frequency Analysis
Ti me seri es Fi 1 e:16834dsout.tsf Qo;��- v�C �.omQ1�o.n��
Project Location:5ea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(C FS) (CFS) Pe ri od
0.6G4 2 2/09/O1 20:00 2.31 1 100.00 0.990
0.133 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.664 2 25.00 0.960
0.441 4 3/06/03 21:00 0.446 3 lO.OQ 0.900
0.122 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.441 4 5.00 0.800
Q.173 6 1/08/OS 3:00 0.330 S 3.00 0.667
0.330 S 1/18/06 23:00 0.173 6 2.00 0. 500
0.446 3 il/24/06 7:00 0.133 7 1.30 0.231
2.31 1 1/09/08 10:00 0.122 8 1.10 0.091
Computed Peaks 1.76 50.00 0.980
Page 1
Jailhouse Window Sizing
Date: 10/6/2014
BCE Project No.: 16834
ProjecF: Copperwood
Per Figure 5.3.4.E King County Q=C(L-0.2H)H�`
Drainage Manual 2009
Where: Q=flovl(cfs)=C(L-0.2H) H�= 3.97 cfs {Allowable Flow)
C=3.27+0.4 F!/Y{ft)= 3.30 ft
H=hydraulic head(ft)- 0.50 ft
P=distance from outflow pipe to overfloar elevatlon(ft)= 7.00 ft
L=circumference length(ft)= 3.50 ft
D=inside diamter(ft) = 4.50 ft
100yr Peak Flow= 3.61 cfs
Peak Flow < Allowable Flow (OK)
Jailhouse Widow Size= 3.50 ft. long x 0.50 ft. htgh
� riser
H - �
D L -
P
-�--- PLAN VIEW
NTS
SECTION
NTS
53.4 CONTROL STRUCTURES—MBTNODS OF ANALYSIS
Riser Overflow
The nomograph in Figure 5.3.4.H may be used to determine the head(in feet)above a riser of given
diameter and for a given flow(usvally the 100-year peak flow for developed conditians). ;
FIGURE 5.3.4.H RISER INFLOW CURVES I
�o0 72 54 48
42
36 I
33
30
27
I
24
�
21 =
s �
� ,a
�
�.
� 10 15 W
w
�
- �
�
...
d 12
10
�
1
0.1 HEAD IN FEET(measured from crest of riser) �p
Q,,,,,�=s.739 DH'n Control Structure Riser
Qo�i�e3.782 D�H�n Q- 3.61 CFS
Q In cfs,D and H in feet D= 18in
Slope change occurs at we(rvorifice transitio� H_ 0.39 FT
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009
5-47
53.4 CONTROL STRUCTURES—METHODS OF ANALYSIS
Riser Overftow
The nomograph in Figure 5.3.4.H may be used to determine the head(in feet)above a riser of given
diameter and for a given flow(usually the I00-year peak flow for developed conditions).
FIGURE 53.4.H RISER INFLOW CURVES
100 72 54 48
42
36
�
33 '
30
27
I
24
�
21 �
� I
� 18
� �
� i0 15 w
w
�
�
�
...
d 12
10
1
0.1 HEAD IN FEET(measured from crest oi riser) ��
aw.��.739 DH� Emergency Over Flow
q,�n�,a3.782 D�H�n Q- 3.61 CFS
Q In cfs,D and H in feet D= 48in
Slope change occurs at welr-orffice transition
H= 0.21 FT
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009
5-47
�, Wetpooi Sizing Worksheet
�
�
6.4.1 WETPONDS—BASIC AND LARGE—METHODS OF ANALYSIS
FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES(FEE'1�
ST 1.0/ �A � 2
ST 1.1 ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA. 0.9 �A.�„'��„�,��,.
� ,
q ■i�n eou�rr
i
\�
-I `� e
t
� a a
�,� '- '
�' B
.Q� �
" +
cNku �.'
e,�
� �„ ,,,,
i :
f'
wa
_ T
I � ��
� �' I � �i� wa�� � �
•�' •
� 0 %�
1
.e.r
'S cwoan
\ � / Q
� Q
1
r.� �
s�oa Q ;�7
r _ • �' n a'
r � � - -
r
0.54" � -, �
�
(0.045') b
�1[IICE COtl�ff
0.47" �
(0.039') � •
�_TI_7 Incorporated Area �� '
.� RivBdLake 0.4 7"
— Major Road (0.039') p,5 2�
(0.043') 0.65"
NOTE:Areas east of the eastemmost isopluvial should use 0.65 0.56" (0.054')
inches unless raintall data is availabie for the location of interest (0.047')
result,generates large amounts of runoff. For this application,till soil types include Buckley and
bedrock soils,and alluvial and outwash soils that have a seasonally high water table or are underlain
at a shallow depth(less than 5 feet)by glacial rill. U.S. Soil Conservation Service(SCS)hydrologic
soil groups that are classified as till soils include a few B,most C,and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for
classification of specific SCS soil types.
2009 Surface WaterDesign Manual 1/9/2009
6-71
Wetpool Sizing Worksheet
Summary of the 2009 SuAace Water Design Manual Requiremenfs
Project Name: �;���;��e��,�.�c���i Project Number: I�:�3:���1
Step 1) Determfne volume factor f.
Basicsize............................................. f= 3
Large size............................................. f= 4.5
Step 2)Determine rainfall R for mean annual Storm
Detemine rainfall R for mean annual storm
Rainfall................................................. O.U3J (feet)
Step 3)Calculate runoff from mean annual storm
V,_ (0.9Ai +0.25A�9+0.10A,�+O.a 1 Aa9) X R
A;=tributary area of impenrious surface 255,697 (sfl
A,9=tributary area of till grass 171,626 (sfl
A�=tributary area of till forest 0 (sf)
Ao9=tributary area of outwash grass 0 (s�
R= rainfall from mean annual storm 0.039 (feet)
V�=Volume of runoff from mean annual storm 10,648 (cfl
Step 4)Calculate wetpool Volume
Vb=fV�
f=Volume Factor 3
Vr=Volume runoff, mean annual atorm 10,648 (cfl
Vb=Volume of the wetpool 31,945 (cf)
Step 5) Determine wetpool dimenslons
a) Determine geometry of first cell
Volume in first cell 9,583 (cfl
Depth h 1 st cell (minus sed. Storage) 7 (feet)
Determine horizontal xs area at mid-depth using 1,369 (s�
A mid=Vol. 1 st cell/h
Mid-width 37 (feet)
Mid-length 37 (feet)
Determine xs area at surface
Z=Side slope length (_H:1� 3 3:1 recommended
2(h/2 x Z)= 21 (feet)
Dimensions of top of pond adjusted for geometrics
Top width 58 (feet)
Top length 58 (feet)
Area of Top 3364 (feet)
b) Determine geometry of second cell
Volume in second cell 22,36i (cf}
Depth h 2nd cell 4 (feet)
Determine xs area at mid-depth using 5,590 (sf)
A mid=Vol. 2nd cell/h
Mid-width 37 (feet)
Mid-fength 151 (feet)
Determine horizontal xs area at surface
Z=Side slope (ength {_H:1 V} 3 3:1 recommended
2(h/2 x Z}- 12 �feet)
Dimensions of top of pond adjusted for geometrics
Top width 49 (feet)
Top length 163 (feet)
Area of Top 7991 (feet}
Adjustment to celfs (if necessary)
Geometry check: Overall pond L:W at mid-depth = 3:1
Pond width (mid-depth) 37
Cell 1 length (mid-depth} 37
Cell 2 length (mid-depth) 151
Pond Length (mid-depth)=Cell 1 +Cell 2 188
L mid : W mid = 5.08
Total Wetpond Surface area required = 11,356
3,733
�
�
�
�
�
U
C6
U
�
a�
�
�
c�
�
�
0
�
OUTFALL PIPE FLOW VELOCITY
SIZED FOR 100-YR
- �.: — _.-- --.,�__._ .�
��Worksheet:CircularPipe-1 ��_0_I��
UNiorm Fbw (�eduey Vxkd Flow J Measeyes
Sdve For: ��Oe� � � Frldian Methat �F�� �
ROU�f1ESsC0E1fiCIG�t 0.012 O �W'�'��: 079 �a
Cherml Slope: 0.00550 1tM JYelted Perineter. 2.23 a
Normd Deptk 0.69 ft Hydraic Rariu: 0.35 n
Diemder: 1.50 � T�p�h� 1.49 n
��� 3.61 fl•ls Gidcal Depth: 0.73 �
L 10�`t r �iq�. �►�«,c F� as.� �
'F 1o'^J �, �,c r a�ed�.or,�e: o.004s� +t►a
F.i++u�c �G� fi��••- veiodtY aSs tus
FI�w `b'�Y"°°�: o.� n
�,
Speciflc Ener9Y 1.01 ft �
Fradal�Mniber: �.��
Me�un.rm Diuhxgx � 9.08 tt'�
dscharge Flt 8.44 ft'�
Slope Fut 0.007 07 �
Flow Typa ` c�p����
\� I�TT�II �'C.i1�i��T
�
8 Celd,tdiorl SucceaShl.
���.
�� .��, L �.� rt►� =? ���►� 1���� 'q ��t��, �. .
�� �_�;, �x;v' }�,u� j�,,:Fe,,_., '�.,i`h,r, '�1�;�;,, W',1� � �� Zn;k�,
L� ,r;f,�.��,� Q�r ��L��h� 5,,��,cG W��� '(�cs5n P'�.nvAl �Z�i�
. 7,.5' w:� � IZ' �ohg w 2 ' 1��P .
�
a K:P'�W' �c d2 �"O �x�i�2 � ��C: �(`c?Wrt e� �:�Pt_'.
Copperwood Outfall
Project Description
FricGon Method Manning Formula
Solve For Normal Depth
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.012
Channel Slope 0.00550 fUft
Diameter 1.50 ft
Discharge 3.61 ft'!s
Results
Normal Depth 0.69 ft
Flow Area 0.79 ft'
Wetted Perimeter 2.23 ft
Hydraulic Radius 0.35 ft
Top Wdth 1.49 ft
Critical Depth 0.73 ft
Percent Full 45.7 %
Critical Slope 0.00451 ft!ft
�l .I
Velocity 4.59 ftls -�-____ /nn � V�.�u:_. �y
Velocity Head 0.33 ft
Specific Energy 1.01 ft
Froude Number 1.11
Maximum Discharge 9.08 ft'/s
Discharge Full 8.44 ft'!s
Slope Full 0.00101 ft/ft
Flow Type SuperCritical
GVF Input Data
DownsVeam Depth 0.00 ft
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 ft
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
NoRnal Depth Over Rise 45.70 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Bentley Syatems,ine. Haeetad Methoda SaB�Mk�61drAAaster V81(SELECTserles 1) [08.11.01.03]
416/20161:45:12 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive 5uite 200 W Wetertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2
Copperwood Outfall
GVF Outpuf Data --_ _ _ _ � = \ _ '
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal depth 0.69 R
Criticat Depth 0.73 ft
Channel Slope 0.00550 ft/ft
Critical Sfope 0.00451 �,'ft
Bentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods So�dfe�EtdarMaster VBi(SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03]
4!6/2015 1:45:12 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2
5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
The on-site conveyance system was designed in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM. The
proposed conveyance system for this project is curb, gutter, catch basins, and storm drainage
pipe. The majority of the storm drainage pipe used will consist of smooth-walled corrugated
polyethylene pipe with a Manning's roughness coefficient design value of 0.014. ,
100-year conveyance calculations for the pipes have been completed using the Rational Method
as shown on the enclosed Excel spreadsheet. The following are the parameters used in design
of the pipes ,
1. A Runoff Coefficient — 'C' value was calculated from the 2009 KCSWDM for each tributary '
area pursuant to table 3.2.1.A. ��
� 2. A 100-yearl24-hour precipitation of 3.9 inches in accordance with Figure 3.2.1 D. II'�
3. A starting time of concentration of 6.3.
4. An "n"factor of 0.014. (0.012 for Backwater Analysis)
The tributary areas have been calculated to each of the catch basins connecting to the proposed
piping system, as shown on the enclosed map.
A 100-year backwater analysis to determine the hydraulic grade line and to see if any catch basin
rims overtop has also been performed using KCBW in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM and
the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. Please see the attached calculations in
this section.
�
i
,
i
16834.015.doc
16834-Conveyance.xls
BARGHAUSEN C�NSULTING ENGINEERS-PIPE FLOW CALCULATOR
using the Rational Method&Manning Formula
CITY OF RENTON DESIGN FOR 100 YEAR STORM
JOB NAME: COPPERWOOD NOTE:ENTER DEFAULTS AND STORM DATA BEFORE BEGINNING
JOB#: 16834 DEFAULTS C= 0.64 n- 0.014
REVISED: 2/10/2015 d= 12 Tc= 6.3
A=Contributing Area(Ac) Qd=Design Flow(cis) COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD"Ir"-EQUATION
C=Runoff Coefficient Qf=Full Capacity Fiow(cfs) STORM Ar Br
T�Time of Concentration(min) Vd=Velociry at Design Flow(fps) 2YR 1.58 0.58
1=Intensiry at Tc(in/hr) Vf=VeloCity at Full Flow(ips) t 0YR 2.44 0.64 PRECIP= 3.9
d=Diameter of Pipe(in) s=Slope of pipe(%) 25YR 2.66 0.65 Ar= 2.61
L=Length of Pipe(ft) n=Manning Roughness Coefficient 50YR 2.75 0.65 Br= 0.63
D=Water Depth at Qd(in) Tt=Travel Time at Vd(min) 100YR 2.61 0.63
FROM TO A s L d Tc n C SUM A A'C SUM A'C I Qd Qt Qd/Qf D/d D Vf Vd Tt
CB1i29 CB828 0.09 2.18 76 12 8.3 0.014 0.64 0.09 0.06 0.06 3.19 0.1 B 4.88 0.038 0.137 1.64 622 2.97 0.43
CB#28 CBif26 O.U3 1.00 119 12 6.7 0.014 0.64 0.12 0.02 0.08 3.06 024 3.31 0.071 0.181 2.17 4.21 2.40 0.83
CB827 CB#26 0.58 0.55 24 �2 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.58 0.37 0.37 3.19 1.19 2.45 0.483 0.490 5.88 3.13 3.12 0.13
CB#26 CBM24 0.45 1.95 150 t 2 7.6 0.014 0.64 0.45 029 0.74 2.85 2.10 4.62 0.454 0.474 5.68 5.88 5.79 0.43
CB#25 CB#24 0.51 0.55 24 12 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.51 0.33 0.33 3.19 1.04 2.45 0.425 0.457 5.48 3.13 3.02 0.13
CB#24 CBIt23 0.43 1.00 146 �8 8.0 0.014 0.64 0.43 0.28 1.34 2.75 3.68 9.75 0.377 0.425 7.65 5.52 5.13 0.47
CB#23 CBN20 0.48 0.55 41 18 8.5 0.014 0.64 0.91 0.31 1.64 2.65 4.36 7.23 0.603 0.558 10.04 4.10 4.27 0.16
CB#22 CBri21 0.62 0.55 34 12 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.62 0.40 0.40 3.19 1.27 2.45 0.516 0.509 6.11 3.13 3.16 0.18
CB821 CBf�20 0.81 0.55 25 18 6.5 0.014 0.64 1.43 0.52 0.92 3.14 2.87 7.23 0.397 0.438 7.88 4.10 3.86 0.11
CB#20 CBM19 0.04 0.55 23 1b 8.6 0.014 0.64 0.04 0.03 2.59 2.62 6.78 7.23 0.937 0.762 13.71 4.10 4.63 0.08
CB#19 C8q17 0.09 0.55 143 24 8.7 0.014 0.64 0.13 0.06 2.64 2.60 6.89 15.57 0.442 0.467 1121 4.96 4.85 0.49
CB#18 CBq17 0.59 1.00 24 72 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.59 0.38 0.38 3.19 1.21 3.31 0.365 0.417 5.00 4.21 3.88 0.10
CB#17 CB#16 0.01 0.55 61 24 92 0.014 0.64 0.01 0.01 3.03 2.52 7.62 15.57 0.489 0.494 11.85 4.96 4.96 0.20
CB#16 CBM15 0.39 0.55 24 24 9.4 0.014 0.64 0.4 025 328 2.48 8.13 15.57 0.522 0.513 12.30 4.96 5.02 0.08
CB#15 CB#6 0.06 0.55 109 24 9.5 0.014 0.64 0.46 0.04 3.32 2.47 8.18 15.57 0.525 0.515 12.35 4.96 5.02 0.36
CB#14 CB#13 0.11 0.55 158 12 6.3 0.01A 0.64 0.11 0.07 0.07 3.19 0.22 2.45 0.092 0.202 2.43 3.13 1.90 1.38
CB#13 CBIf11 0.02 0.55 37 12 7.7 0.014 0.64 0.13 0.01 0.08 2.82 0.23 2.45 0.096 0.207 2.49 3.13 1.94 0.32
CB#12 CB#11 0.14 3.58 57 12 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.14 0.09 0.09 3.19 0.29 626 0.046 0.148 1.77 7.97 4.00 0.24
CBM11 CB#9 0.02 0.55 58 12 S.0 0.014 0.64 O.Q2 0.01 0.19 2.75 0.51 2.45 0.208 0.306 3.67 3.13 2.45 0.39
CB#10 CB#9 0.64 2.47 24 12 8.3 0.014 0.64 0.64 0.41 0.41 3.19 1.31 520 0.252 0.341 4.10 6.62 5.51 0.07
CB#9 CB#7 0.82 0.55 247 t 8 8.4 0.014 0 64 0.82 0.52 7.12 2.66 2.98 7.23 0.413 0.448 8.07 4.10 3.91 7.OS
Page 1
16834-Co��veyance.xls
CBMB CBa►7 0.41 0.55 25 7 2 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.41 0.26 026 3.19 0.84 2.45 0.342 0.404 4.84 3.13 2.84 0.15
CB#7 CB#6 0.08 0.55 31 18 9.4 0.014 0.64 0.06 0.04 1.71 2.47 423 7.23 0.584 0.548 9.87 4.10 4.24 0.12
CB#6 CB#5 0.08 0.50 29 30 9.8 0.014 0.64 0.08 0.05 5.08 2.41 12.24 26.92 0.454 0.474 14.22 5.49 5.40 0.09
CB#5 C8#3 0.52 0.50 198 30 9.9 0.014 0.64 0.6 0.33 5.41 2.40 72.96 26.92 0.482 0.489 14.68 5.49 5.47 0.60
CB#4 CB#3 0.05 1.00 65 12 6.3 0.014 0.64 0.05 0.03 0.03 3.19 0.10 3.31 0.031 0.122 1.46 4.21 1.88 0.58
CB#3 POND 0.66 1.72 232 30 10.5 0.014 0.64 0.66 0.42 5.86 2.31 13.54 49.93 0.271 0.358 10.73 10.18 8.68 0.45
Page 2
3.2.1 RAT[ONAL METHOD
FIGURE 3.2.1.D 100-YEAR 24HOUR ISOPLUViALS
3�—�I __r,____ __ O COUMTY
T N COUNTY
�� ' Ho� ii� / . ' `�.t�orx i, . i�{ —�_ _��' �_
3� ,�s ; � l f -_ r ' 'r_ - —.� , ���
3, - -_ �-'
� � i � , � z ;� '',, -, ti
� ' ��
, , \_= - ' ...}, -
�� �, � � � �,, � ., ,_
e �-"
� •, . ,-- `�._
i , �
3�B 3S J -� J a,�;i ` — r - _-_ ' e.oy.
9 � -
q - � y r' i
o �, a.�_- �. �
q� �" ,t, ,' ; � �---�_� 4.
4 � �-� - i � � � i� i ', - ,
I� � � w '� '� i� ���'� ��
,� ; ,
�
• ` ��,� � �h.Y.o��, , , .
4 \ I i.'1 � i'I`IJI i�'1--� i � 1 l• J�
3 ' _. _
�,: � �: , � �_ � i I ��
St '� �" � ,,_ _`; _ _i -
.� �� ��� . ��� � :
�����, ;E.
;
-� o. � i ti �, , ,
� n�, � ,
- �� � ' � �
� l��� l �� �..��`� _ _ -
� � '�' � ,� �� r �
�� ,ti} �r,. �i �,� �_ � _ = j- ,--
� �- ,i (� - � ,00�.
�� ���'� '' '� �. -- '� � - — . O
. �
� - -- ,� - - - -
�i ' . ��� - I `,r'` � �.
\�
� � � � ' _ _ � - � `, ��'
;'`
. �:.
� — � _��_� ��� �'_ - - i �
I ,� { a 5:� � �-�.
,.�... ! ', 1 ��� "� �, .,r — �� �
��� ' .e i'� � i� ' \ i
� �ti I � _ : '�� �
';°� � 1; -. __ (l Q ,�
.,.. 1 '�J —1 - , 'r .
( � ~ ' � ' +r � _ 1
\ _ �" r � .�..I ' \
�
i_ �
�i ;� �
�� i, ,
--- ';��J -�;=�;- ,�.�;
� • i � i ��o.�,.:.�
5,�° i �,. �I�' '� ,!�. _ �
, a ,;_ ' _-t`
� !� _ 4a4� � r( ;��_� � -I,-.-- ���� - `; -- �
1 -o ' _ `' ��
' � �.�
� ..�:".`- -�- � ��, .�. ��� � 'i'-- b�
_`� ��
�v ! ;�p � �.��–� �� d � � • O
i _ i m� ��,, -�� � — �- � � �-
.'� �'(- o _ _
�,a �. � , v
� L
� I
' 'K a couNr�
Y�„�, _ i•• -
PIE CE COUNTY
WESTERN o° `� � '��
`�� �' ' 6.5
KING COUNTY ao ,, ,� �; ; `EMYY .;,; s.o
N a• ry � ; --- '� 5.5
� �
100-Year 24-Hour a'� a�- _ r.
Precipitation °`ay �o -�, ,_,-L,
in Inches °,�M"es
h�
2009 Surface Water Design Manual (/9/2009
3-17
6.4.1 WETPONDS—BASIC AND LARGE—METHODS OFANALYS/S
FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES(FEET)
ST 1.0/ LA 1.2
ST 1.1 ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA. 0.9 �A,�„;�,��,�,,.
n� - � -_ .�.o ceu
a .�.
' \..� _; s
� ` e '
_ ;�- : �
� - "
� - � b'��
,i ,�
� 1�� - - - ��`� � �
l � /
' y I �l 'P� 2.i
��•1 ' -+ •r ' _ ` `
i � ���
Elliau �
B�y �
w �
I r / f� t �1� / ,�
�
- � � ^ �
i S, ` , , ,� �� f�
� - r._��r � � �v
/ � � �l
C�Z� A .; -_ S:� �.".. ,
- _ - o, � :�
., �
� .,..,.�.
' a � -
,y... � _ � � 0
Pugrt
Somrd a _-.� iSCRi
/'� p
/� � `�� � (, ,� _ _
_ �
. � p _
0.54" �
(0.045') �� o
o �
rrt�c�cou�r• \ .
0.4 7"
(0.039') � .
ll' Incorporated Area �� -' °�
.r� River/Lake 0.4 7" J'
Major Road (0.039') 0.5 2" � ^
(0.043') 0.6 5"
NOTE:Areas east of the eastemmost isopluvtal should use 0.65 0.5 6" (0.054')
inches unless rainfall data is avaiiable for the location of interest (0.047')
result, generates large amounts of runoff. For this application, till soil types include Buckley and
bedrock soils,and alluvial and outwash soils that have a seasonally high water table or are underlain
at a shallow depth(less than 5 feet)by glacial till. U.S. Soil Conservation Service(SCS)hydrologic
soil groups that are classified as till soils include a few B,most C,and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for
classification of specific SCS soil types.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009
6-71
� \ I � — -
I °_ I
0
— — — o
_ „�'g / '
�
I : � i
'�j� � � j'�I I��'I
f �'I �Iii, ,
1
� , �I o
. �
bb '
A f S
'_ _ . .. "__ -
��— . �� . . � . '_- — . - _.. ., .� � — _ _
� � i ��
v
� �--__ --- -- ,
� , � - _r-� -r� i ; 1 b
;_ _ _ � � � � i � ;
�
cc b a� v rn b cn A c� n� b
� o
�{
�
�
i �
I ro � o � � � I
,� ' ; � � I, � �
-- -- �
A
' --� - � ,
�: - -- +`-
�
� . -
O � _ `
. . � ., _i .. ... ... ; , ;,
,
�'. ,
�j ���' ��-�-��.:�.� �i���-1WW1�,.. , _'
�
,I �� �- ..,�: -. �_ � .. ,. � � . . �_ . .
�
: . .. ._ _,...`i-=--' . : ._. ._._-. . .,..'-�-- �b. - ,: �. .._L.�.. ..� � .,. -:.�.. ,
- '
�-- -- -- -- . � ' � �
' � � � � i
I
� �� ,� � � � � �i .. !�� � � �.
� H N b N N� N N�,.:. � N i��
����- I�_• I� � D i O • � N I C.�b A Cr � b i V i� ` I.
r � I � I � I �
� ' � �.'� � i A i p ,
i � I ,
�I �
'' � � ' ��,�s �L�i��r�wwt i;r�g �
�---------- - 1 I � I � i r In i
I � �'" � � � I I � -I I � �
�� I g rn b �'' �' �'' � N ��' � �' � c�' a�o � �
� - - —� � ° � � M ' � � ¢ ; i a � � �
� ' � O
� � � ' ' � - � � �
-�
� _
.
i
:
. . .__ __ .
. . __ - - - ZZ
, . . . . .: .:.. :1: . . : �
' '�
_�_ _-- __ _ . .. , � � � ,b m
` �-� .�� �- � _ � z � N
C� ' i`� i. � Q � O �
———� , i Tl
i � � � �
� � '•' � m
I ,�,- _�—____ . r � V � $ � � N � � �� � 'I I � D �� � �
I � � b y � _ b � I b � � A O D
� ' b � � ! � o � � � �
� � �{ � � � �
�
� ; ; : � � � ° ��— M� —�—_— �������� _ '�� � ° � � b
ii l> , ��
ilf__ i : i ' , �' V �5 �
�_ I
�
__ � �
� ',� �
I � � �� � ! , �� � �
I � � ` —
_�I _ �
� � ' _ - - --
..: , -- —_--�__
_ .�-- — -----__ —
_ � —� � ,. _
� --� _- , ,,�=_ _ i i n
_ __ -- �, I-----" �""- i��� _
. > --- _ � i
, � - _ - - � ijj
r i �� - - - " i � � �//%� �
� ��/
� � ' � ' , ' �,j �� --------
� �� i � i�j/ /i� ''� �
� � • ' � �
//
\�� � .'/ � b �� %
�� I
I .� _ � � �� �i
I u' o �! ���' �
�`_� / � ii'� �i � '
_ � , i
�
. � �, ���� � �� � � � �
„ �
' ' I
<��� �` ' �i'� �i� �
_ ���: : �, �i i
\ . \\� ' /// // _
-\ '\\ :, /// / — _ �
- �`�,, , i ��� i
��,� ��i
� .__ - - ,_ _. - - - - - -
W - - -
� ---------- _ ---- ------ _ � _ I
i — — T— — r— —r — — -�'---- —i — I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I �
I I I I � �
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I � �
I I I I I � I I
I I I I I �
I I I I I � I
No. Dat. By cka. rovr. Raviaion
Job N�mber
$Cole:
Q.G' A�y1 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH °iaiv°�d �` TMb'
16834 P R` KENT wn sao3z o.ow� „,�_,�,,, �UADRANT HOMES
m� " Z �azsj zsi—szzz ,•_So� 14725 SE 36TH ST. SUITE 200 PIPE SIZING AREA MAP
sn«c o � (425) 251-8782 FAX cn.�k.a—_
� � _ ^�p�°�°a �°rt'°°' BELLEVUE, WA 98006 FOR
s� P5� CIVIL ENCINEERINC, UND PIANNING, N�� COPPERWOOD
1 of � �'iN��N�1NE�' SURVEYING, ENVIRONAIENTAL SERVICES Date
BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES
Pipe data from file:16834bwl.bwp
Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions
Tailwater Elevation:384. feet
Discharge Range:12.59 to 13.54 Step of 0.1 [cfs]
Overflow Elevation:393.08 feet
Weir:NONE
Channel Width:2. feet
CB#3 => POND
PIPE N0. 1: 232 LF - 30"CP @ 1.72� OUTLET: 373.00 INLET: 377.00 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.70 BEND: 66 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: 0.05
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO AWI
****************r************************************,r*************************
12.59 7.32 384.32 * 0.012 1.19 0.79 11.00 11.00 7.19 7.32 1.67
12.69 7.32 384.32 * 0.012 1.20 0.80 11.00 11.00 7.19 7.32 1.68
12.79 7.33 384.33 * 0.012 1.20 0.80 11.00 11.00 7.19 7.33 1.69
12.89 7.33 384.33 * 0.012 1.21 0.80 11.00 11.00 7.19 7.33 1.70
12.99 7.39 3B4.39 * 0.012 1.21 0.81 11.00 11.00 7.20 7.34 1.71
13.09 7.39 384.39 * 0.012 1.22 0.81 11.00 11.00 7.20 7.34 1.71
13.19 7.35 384.35 * 0.012 1.22 0.81 11.00 11.00 7.20 7.35 1.72
13.29 7.35 384.35 * 0.012 1.23 0.81 11.00 11.00 7.21 7.35 1.73
13.39 7.36 369.36 * 0.012 1.23 0.82 11.00 11.00 7.21 7.36 1.79
13.49 7.37 389.37 * 0.012 1.29 0.82 11.00 11.00 7.21 7.37 1.75
13.59 7.37 384.37 * 0.012 1.29 0.82 11.00 11.00 7.22 7.37 1.75
C B#5 => C B#3
PIPE N0. 2: 198 LF - 30"CP Q 0.50� OUTLET: 377.00 INLET: 377.99 INTYP: 5
JUNC N0. 2: OVERFLOW-EL: 387.31 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATZO: 0.06
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI I
,t*,t*,t**,t**t,t+t,t*,kr***,t,t,t****,t*,t*,t***,t**,t�,t**,t*,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t**+r,t,tt****,t*rt�,t*,t*,t******,t
11.99 6.59 384.53 * 0.012 1.16 1.07 7.32 7.32 6.48 6.54 1.58
12.09 6.59 384.53 * 0.012 1.17 1.08 7.32 7.32 6.48 6.54 1.59
12.13 6.55 384.59 * 0.012 1.17 1.08 7.33 7.33 6.49 6.55 1.60
12.23 6.56 384.55 * 0.012 1.18 1.09 7.33 7.33 6.99 6.56 1.b0
12.32 6.57 384.56 * 0.012 1.18 1.09 7.34 7.34 6.50 6.57 1.61
12.92 6.58 384.57 * 0.012 1.19 1.10 7.34 7.34 6.51 6.58 1.62
12.51 6.58 384.57 * 0.012 1.19 1.10 7.35 7.35 6.52 6.58 1.62
12.61 6.59 384.58 * 0.012 1.20 1.11 7.35 7.35 6.52 6.59 1.63
12.70 6.60 3B4.59 * 0.012 1.20 1.11 7.36 7.36 6.53 6.60 1.64
12.80 6.61 389 .60 * 0.012 1.21 1.12 7.37 7.37 6.54 6.61 1.69
12.90 6.62 389 .61 * 0.012 1.21 1. 12 7.37 7.37 6.55 6.62 1 .55 ',
CB#6 => CB#5
PIPE N0. 3: 29 LF - 30"CP @ 0.52� OUTLET: 377.99 ZNLET: 378.19 INTYP: 5 i
JUNC NO. 3: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.92 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: 0.50
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
*****************************************�***#***�***************************�*
11.27 6.60 384.79 * 0.012 1.13 1.03 6.54 6.59 6.92 6.60 1.66
11.36 6.59 369.73 * Q.012 1.13 1.03 6.54 6.59 6.41 6.59 1.67
11.45 6.61 364.75 * 0.012 1.14 1.04 6.55 6.55 6.42 6.61 1.68
11.54 6.62 384.76 * 0.012 1.14 1.04 6.56 6.56 6.93 6.62 1.66
11.63 6.63 384.77 * 0.012 1.15 1.05 6.57 6.57 6.99 6.63 1.69
11.72 6.64 389.78 * 0.012 1.15 1.05 6.58 6.58 6.45 6.69 1.70
11.81 6.65 364.79 * 0.012 1.16 1.06 6.58 6.58 6.95 6.65 1.71
11.90 6.67 389.81 * 0.012 1.16 1.06 6.59 6.59 6.46 6.67 1.72
11.99 6.68 384.82 * 0.012 1.17 1.07 6.60 6.60 6.47 6.68 1.73
12.08 6.69 389.83 * 0.012 1.17 1.07 6.61 6.61 6.48 6.69 1.74
12.17 6.70 384.89 * 0.012 1.18 1.07 6.62 6.62 6.99 6.70 1.74
CB#15 => CB#6
PIPE NO. 4: 109 LF - 29"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 378.64 INLET: 379.24 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 4: OVERFLOW-EL: 387.97 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATZO: 0.01
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
**************************************+r*****��*********�c*****:**********.***,�**
7.51 5.77 385.01 * 0.012 0.98 0.90 6.10 6.10 5.61 5.77 1.93
7.57 5.76 395.00 * 0.012 0.98 0.90 6.09 6.09 5.60 5.76 1.44
7.63 5.78 385.02 * 0.012 0.99 0.91 6.11 6.11 5.61 5.78 1
7.69 5.79 385.03 * 0.012 0.99 0.91 6.12 6.12 5.63 5.79 1 .
7.75 5.81 385.05 * 0.012 1.00 0.92 6.13 6.13 5.69 5.91 1
7.81 5.83 385.07 * 0.012 1.00 0.92 6.19 6.19 5.65 5.83 1.
7.67 5.89 385.08 * 0.012 1.00 0.92 6.15 6.15 5.67 5.84 1 . -
7.93 5.86 365.10 * 0.012 1.01 0.93 6.17 6.17 5.69 5.86 1. �
7.99 5.88 385.12 * 0.012 1.01 0.93 6.18 6.18 5.69 5.88 1. _;+
6.05 5.89 385.13 * 0.012 1 .02 0. 94 6. 19 6.19 5.71 5.89 1. Si'�
8.11 5.91 �25. 15 � , .���1= -. ;2 � . 9= _ .ZO �0. �0 5. ?2 5. 9_ _ .51
CB#16 => CB#1:-;
PIPE N0. 5: 29 �F - 24"CF � U. �90 CUILET: 37y.24 I:dLET: 379.37 INIYP: �
JUNC N0. 5: OVERFLOW-EL: 387.47 BEND: 45 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 9.0 Q-RATIO: 0.07
Q(CFS) HW(FTj HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
**�*�******************,r*****:**********#********************************#***a*
7.99 5.76 385.13 * 0.012 0.97 0.90 5.77 5.77 5.67 5.76 1.35
7.50 5.75 385.12 * 0.012 0.98 0.90 5.76 5.76 5.66 5.75 1.36
7.56 5.76 385.13 * 0.012 0.98 0.91 5.78 5.78 5.67 5.76 1.37
7.61 5.78 385.15 * 0.012 0.99 0.91 5.79 5.79 5.69 5.78 1.37
7.67 5.80 385.17 * 0.012 0.99 0.92 5.81 5.81 5.70 5.80 1.38
7.73 5.82 385.19 * 0.012 0.99 0.92 5.83 5.83 5.72 5.82 1.39
7.79 5.84 385.21 * 0.012 1.00 0.92 5.84 5.84 5.79 5.89 1.39
7.85 5.85 385.22 * 0.012 1.00 0.93 5.86 5.86 5.76 5.85 1.90
7.91 5.87 385.24 * 0.012 1.01 0.93 5.88 5.88 5.77 5.87 1.90
7.97 5.89 385.26 * 0.012 1.01 0.99 5.89 5.89 5.79 5.89 1.91
8.03 5.91 385.28 * 0.012 1.01 0. 99 5. 91 5. 91 �.81 5. 91 1 .92
CB#17 => CB#16
PIPE NO. 6: 61 LF - 29"CP @ 0.56� OUTLET: 379.37 INLET: 379.71 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 6: OVERFLOW-EL: 387.75 BEND: 45 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.11
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO IiWI
****************************************************************r**************
6.95 5.55 385.26 * 0.012 0.99 0.86 5.76 5.76 5.97 5.55 1.31
7.01 5.54 385.25 * 0.012 0.99 0.86 5.75 5.75 5.96 5.54 1.31
7.06 5.56 385.27 * 0.012 0.95 0.87 5.76 5.76 5.97 5.56 1.32
7.12 5.58 385.29 * 0.012 0.95 0.87 5.78 5.78 5.49 5.58 1.32
7.17 5.60 385.31 * 0.012 0.96 0.87 5.80 5.80 5.51 5.60 1.33
7.23 5.62 385.33 * 0.012 0.96 0.88 5.B2 5.82 5.53 5.62 1.39
7.28 5.69 385.35 * 0.012 0.96 0.88 5.89 5.89 5.55 5.69 1.39
7.39 5.66 385.37 * 0.012 0.97 0.89 5.85 5.85 5.57 5.66 1.35
7.39 5.68 385.39 * 0.012 0.97 0.89 5.87 5.87 5.59 5.68 1.35
7.45 5.70 385.91 * 0.012 0.98 0.89 5.89 5.89 5.61 5.70 1.36
7.50 5.72 385.93 * 0.012 0.98 0.90 5.91 5.91 5.63 5.72 1.37
CB#19 => CB#17
PIPE N0. 7: 143 LF - 24"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 379.71 INLET: 380.50 INTYP: 5
JUNC N0. 7: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.91 BEND: 15 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.02
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
�,r�**,r********:***:**•r*************,r*******,r*«*****************•**r*******,r***
6.26 9.86 385.36 * 0.012 0.89 0.81 5.55 5.55 9.86 9.78 1.09
6.31 4.89 385.39 * 0.012 0.89 0.82 5.59 5.54 4.84 4.77 1.09
6.36 4.86 385.36 * 0.012 0.90 0.82 5.56 5.56 4.86 4.79 1.09
6.41 9.89 385.39 * 0.012 0.90 0.82 5.58 5.58 4.89 9.81 1.10
6.46 9.91 385.41 * 0.012 0.91 0.83 5.60 5.60 4.91 9.83 1.10
6.51 4.93 385.43 * 0.012 0.91 0.83 5.62 5.62 4.93 4.85 1.10
6.56 9 .95 385.45 * 0.012 0.91 0.83 5.69 5.64 9.95 4.87 1.11
6.61 9.97 385.47 * 0.012 0.92 0.84 5.66 5.66 9.97 9.89 1.11
6.66 5.00 385.50 * 0.012 0.92 0.84 5.68 5.68 5.00 9.91 1.11
6.71 5.02 385.52 * 0.012 0.92 0.85 5.70 5.70 5.02 9.93 1.12
6.76 5.09 385.59 * 0.012 0.93 0.85 5.72 5.72 5.09 4.95 1.12
CB#20 => CB#19
PIPE NO. S: 23 LF - 18"CP @ 0.57$ OIITLET: 381.00 INLET: 381.13 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 8: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.32 BEND: 45 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 9.0 Q-RATIO: 0.55
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
��a��+r**,t**,t*,t,t****,t,t,t****,t,t*,t,k*****,t*,t,r**,t**,t**+r,t,t*,t*,t,t**,t,t,t*,t**,tt,t*,t***,t***,t,t
6.14 4.56 385.69 * 0.012 0.96 0.95 9.36 4.36 9.30 4.56 1.47
6.19 4.55 385.68 * 0.012 0.97 0.95 9.39 4.39 9.28 4.55 1.47
6.24 4.57 385.70 * 0.012 0.97 0.96 9.36 4.36 4.30 4.57 1.98
6.29 4.60 385.73 * 0.012 0.97 0.96 4.39 4.39 9.33 4.60 1.99
6.33 4.63 385.76 * 0.012 0.98 0.97 4.41 9.41 4.35 4.63 1.50
6.38 4.66 385.79 * 0.012 0.98 0.97 4.93 9.93 4.37 4.66 1.51
0.43 4.68 385.81 * 0.012 0.99 0.98 4.45 9.95 4.40 4.68 1.51
6.98 9.71 385.89 * 0.012 0.99 0.98 4.97 9.97 4.42 9.71 1.52
6.53 4.74 385.87 * 0.012 0.99 0.99 4.50 9.50 4.44 4.74 1.53
6.58 9.77 385.90 * 0.012 1.00 0.99 4.52 9.52 9.47 9.77 1.59
6.63 9.79 385.92 * 0.012 1.00 1.00 4.54 9.54 9.99 9.79 1.55
CB#23 => CB#20
PZPE NO. 9: 41 LF - 18"CP @ 0.56$ OUTLET: 381.13 INLET: 381.36 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 9: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.63 BEND: 30 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.19
Q(CFS) HW(FTj HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
********,r****************,r*,r,+**,r*:******�************r******�**,r**********s****
3.96 4.97 385.83 * 0.012 0.77 0.72 9.56 4.56 4.39 9.47 1.07
3.99 4.45 385.81 * 0.412 0.77 0.73 4.55 4.55 4.37 4.45 1.08
4.02 4.48 385.89 * 0.012 0.77 0.73 4.57 4.57 4.90 4.48 1.08
4.06 4.51 385.87 * 0.012 0.78 0.73 4.60 4.60 4.92 4.51 1.09
4.09 4.54 385.90 * 0.012 0.78 0.74 4.63 4.63 4.45 4.54 1.09
4.12 9.57 385.93 * 0.012 0.78 0.79 4.66 9.66 4.48 9.57 1.10
4.15 9.60 385.96 * 0.012 0.79 0.79 9.68 9.68 4.51 9.60 1.10
4.16 9.63 385.99 * 0.012 0.79 0.75 4.71 9.71 9.59 9.63 1.11
4.21 4.66 386.02 * 0.012 0.79 0.75 9.74 9.74 4.56 9.66 1.11
4.24 9.69 386.05 * 0.012 0.79 0.75 4.77 9.77 9.59 4.69 1.12
4.28 4.72 386.08 * 0.012 0.80 0.76 9.79 9.79 9.62 9.72 1.12
C B#24 => C B#23
PIPE N0.10: 146 LF - 18"CP @ *****$ OUTLET: 381.36 INLET: 182.61 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO.10: OVERFLOW-EL: 388.09 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATIO: 0.76
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
**,r********************,r*******,r**,r*********************,r***�*****,r■,r***.***,r**
3.33 203.23 386.04 * 0.012 0.70 0.00 4.47 9.97203.15 ***** 2.02
3.35 203.21 386.02 * 0.012 0.70 0.00 4.95 4.95203.13 ***** 2.02
3.38 203.24 386.05 * 0.012 0.71 0.00 4.48 9.98203.16 ***** 2.03
3.91 203.28 386.09 * 0.012 0.71 0.00 9.51 9.51203.19 ***** 2.03
3.43 203.31 386.12 * 0.012 0.71 0.00 9.59 9.54203.22 ***** 2.09
3.96 203.34 386.15 * 0.012 0.71 0.00 9.57 4.57203.25 ***** 2.09
3.99 203.37 386.18 * 0.012 0.72 0.00 9.60 4.60203.28 ***** 2.05
3.51 203.91 386.22 * 0.012 0.72 0.00 9.63 4.63203.32 ***** 2.05
3.59 203.44 386.25 * 0.012 0.72 0.00 9.66 4.66203.35 ***** 2.06
3.57 203.48 386.29 * 0.012 0.73 0.00 9.69 9.69203.38 ***** 2.06
3.59 203.51 386.32 * 0.012 0.73 0.00 4.72 9.72203.41 ***** 2.07
CB#26 => CB#24
PIPE NO.11: 150 LF - 12"CP @ 1.95$ OUTLET: 383.31 INLET: 386.23 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO.11: OVERFLOW-EL: 389.50 BEND: � DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATIO: 7.71
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
�***********:*r*****,c************#***********�*****+r**************,r,r***********
1.89 0.88 387.11 * 0.012 0.59 0.91 2.73 2.73 0.59 ***** 0.88
1.91 0.88 387.11 * 0.012 0.59 0.92 2.71 2.71 0.59 ***** 0.88
1.92 0.89 387.12 * 0.012 0.60 0.92 2.74 2.74 0.60 ***** 0.69
1.94 0.89 387.12 * 0.012 0.60 0.42 2.78 2.78 0.60 ***** 0.89
1.95 0.90 387.13 * 0.012 0.60 0.92 2.81 2.81 0.60 ***** 0.90
1.97 0.90 387.13 * 0.012 0.60 0.92 2.84 2.89 0.60 ***** 0.90
1.98 0.91 387.19 * 0.012 0.61 0.42 2.87 2.87 0.61 ***** 0.91
2.00 0.91 387.19 * 0.012 0.61 0.43 2.91 2.91 0.61 ***** 0.91
2.01 0.91 387.19 * 0.012 0.61 0.43 2.99 2.99 0.61 ***** 0.91
2.03 Q.92 387.15 * 0.012 0.61 0.93 2.98 2.98 0.61 ***** 0.92
2.09 0.92 387.15 * 0.012 0.62 0.43 3.01 3.01 0.62 ***** 0.92
CB#28 => CB#26
PIPE N0.12: 119 LF - 12"CP @ 1.00$ OUTLET: 386.23 INLET: 387.92 INTYP: 5
. JUNC N0.12: OVERFLOW-EL: 390.89 BEND: 95 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATZO: 0.33
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
********************************r********************************�***�*********
0.22 0.25 387.67 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.88 0.88 0.20 ***** 0.25
0.22 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.88 0.88 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.22 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.89 0.89 0.20 ***** 0.26
- 0.22 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.89 0.89 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.22 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.90 0.90 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.90 0.90 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.91 0.91 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.91 0.91 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.91 0.91 0.20 ****x 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.92 0.92 0.20 ***** 0.26
0.23 0.26 387.68 * 0.012 0.20 0.17 0.92 0.92 0.20 ***** 0.26
Ci8$t29 => IiO�G�
PIPE N0.13: 76 LF - 12"CP 8 2.18$ OUTLET: 387.92 INLET: 389.08 INTYP: 5
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
*+*�***************************************************************************
0.16 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.16 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.17 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.17 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.17 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.17 0.21 389.29 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.21
0.17 0.22 389.30 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.22
0.17 0.22 389.30 * 0.012 0.17 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.17 ***** 0.22
0.17 0.22 389.30 * 0.012 0.18 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.18 ***** 0.22
0.17 0.22 389.30 * 0.012 0.18 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.18 ***** p.22
0.18 0.22 389.30 * 0.012 0.18 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.18 ***** 0.22
BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRI�M FOR PIPES
Pipe data from file:16839BW2.bwp
Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions
Tailwater Elevation:384.84 feet
Discharge Range:3.23 to 4.23 Step of 0.1 [cfsj
Overflow Elevation:385.63 feet
Weir:NONE
Channel Width:2. feet
CB$�7 => CiB#6
PIPE NO. 1: 31 LF - 18"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 379.14 INLET: 379.31 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.32 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.92
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
**«***********,r************,r+r****************s***,r*+r*,r*****,r*,r+r,e***,�***********
3.23 5.62 389.93 * 0.012 0.69 0.65 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.62 0.96
3.33 5.62 389.93 * 0.012 0.70 0.66 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.62 0.98
3.43 5.63 369.99 * 0.012 0.71 0.67 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.63 0.99
3.53 5.63 364.99 * 0.012 0.72 0.68 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.63 1.01
3.63 5.69 389.95 * 0.012 0.73 0.69 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.69 1.03
3.73 5.64 389.95 * 0.012 0.74 0.70 5.70 5.70 5.56 5.69 1.09
3.83 5.65 389.96 * 0.012 0.75 0.71 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.65 1.06
3.93 5.66 384.97 * 0.012 0.76 0.73 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.66 1.08
� 9.Q3 5.66 384.97 * 0.012 0.77 0.79 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.66 1.09
9.13 5.67 384.98 * 0.012 0.78 �.75 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.67 1.11
4.23 5.68 384.99 * 0.012 0.79 0.76 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.68 1.12
4.23 5.68 384.99 * 0.012 0.79 0.76 5.70 5.70 5.57 5.68 1.12
Ci8$�9 => li6$�7
PIPE NO. 2: 247 LF - 18"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 379.31 INLET: 380.67 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 2: OVERFLOW-EL: 385.77 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 4.84
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
��,r*.,r*********:***:,r,r*************,r******+r,r*************�************+r**s*****
2.27 4.40 385.07 * 0.012 0.58 0.54 5.62 5.62 9.36 9.90 0.79
2.35 4.41 385.08 * 0.012 0.58 0.55 5.62 5.62 9.37 9.91 0.81
2.42 4.42 385.09 * 0.012 0.59 0.55 5.63 5.63 4.38 9.92 0.82
2.49 9.49 385.11 * 0.012 0.60 0.56 5.63 5.63 4.39 9.99 0.84
2.56 9.45 385.12 * 0.012 0.61 0.57 5.69 5.69 9.90 9.95 0.85
2.63 4.47 385.14 * 0.012 0.62 0.58 5.69 5.69 4.92 4.47 0.86
.�
2.70 4.48 385.15 * 0.012 0.63 0.59 5.65 5.65 9.93 9.98 0.88
2.77 4.50 385.17 * 0.012 0.69 0.60 5.66 5.66 9.99 9.50 0.89
2.84 4.52 385.19 * 0.012 0.69 0.60 5.66 5.66 9.96 4.52 0.90
2.91 4.53 385.20 * 0.012 0.65 O.bl 5.67 5.67 9.97 9.53 0.92
2.98 4.55 385.22 * 0.012 0.66 0.62 5.68 5.68 9.99 9.55 0.93
2.98 4.55 385.22 * 0.012 0.66 0.62 5.68 5.68 9.99 9.55 0.93
CB#11 => CB#9
PIPE N0. 3: 58 LF - 12"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 381.17 INLET: 381.99 INTYP: 5
JUNC N0. 3: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.27 BEND: 95 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATIO: 1.22
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
******#********************************************�***********r***************
0.39 3.60 385.09 * 0.012 0.26 0.25 3.90 3.90 3.59 3.60 0.35
0.40 3.60 385.09 * 0.012 0.27 0.26 3.91 3.91 3.59 3.60 0.36
0.41 3.61 385.10 * 0.012 0.27 0.26 3.92 3.92 3.61 3.61 0.36
0.43 3.63 385.12 * 0.012 0.27 0.27 3.99 3.99 3.62 3.63 0.37
0.94 3.65 385.14 * 0.012 0.28 0.27 3.95 3.95 3.64 3.65 0.37
0.95 3.66 385.15 * a.012 0.28 0.27 3.97 3.97 3.66 3.66 0.38
0.96 3.68 385.17 * 0.012 0.29 0.28 3.98 3.98 3.67 3.68 0.38
0.97 3.70 385.19 * 0.012 0.29 0.26 9.00 9.00 3.69 3.70 0.39
0.99 3.72 385.21 * 0.012 0.29 0.28 9.02 9.02 3.71 3.72 0.39
0.50 3.73 385.22 * 0.012 0.30 0.29 4.03 4.03 3.72 3.73 0.90
0.51 3.75 385.29 * 0.012 0.30 0.29 4.05 4.05 3.79 3.75 0.90
� 0.51 3.75 385.24 * 0.012 0.30 0.29 4.05 4.05 3.79 3.75 0.90
CB#13 => CB#11
PIPE NO. 9: 37 LF - 12"CP @ U.54$ OUTLET: 381.99 INLET: 381.69 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 9: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.64 BEND: 45 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATIO: 0.05
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
�****************************************************#************+�***********
0.18 3.90 385.09 * 0.012 0.18 0.17 3.60 3.60 3.90 3.90 0.23
0.18 3.90 385.09 * 0.012 0.18 0.18 3.60 3.60 3.90 3.40 0.23
0.19 3.92 385.11 * 0.012 0.18 0.18 3.61 3.61 3.92 3.42 0.29
0.19 3.93 385.12 * 0.012 0.18 0.18 3.63 3.63 3.93 3.43 0.29
0.20 3.45 385.14 * 0.012 0.19 0.18 3.65 3.65 3.95 3.45 0.29
0.20 3.47 385.16 * 0.012 0.19 �.19 3.66 3.66 3.96 3.97 0.25
0.21 3.48 385.17 * 0.012 0.19 0.19 3.68 3.68 3.98 3.48 0.25
0.21 3.50 385.19 * 0.012 0.19 0.19 3.70 3.70 3.50 3.50 0.25
0.22 3.52 385.21 * 0.012 0.20 0.19 3.72 3.72 3.52 3.52 0.26
0.22 3.59 385.23 * 0.012 0.20 0.20 3.73 3.73 3.59 3.54 0.26
0.23 3.56 385.25 * 0.012 0.20 0.20 3.75 3.75 3.55 3.56 0.26
0.23 3.56 385.25 * 0.012 0.20 0.20 3.75 3.75 3.55 3.56 0.26
CB#14 => CB#13
PIPE NO. 5: 158 LF - 12"CP @ 0.55$ OUTLET: 381.69 INLET: 382.56 INTYP: 5
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
**,r***,r*******,t,t+t****:****a**,►*,t*****,r,r,t*rr*,t*****,t**,t*,t*******,t**,r,t,t,t***:tt*****
0.17 2.54 385.10 * 0.012 0.17 0.17 3.90 3.40 2.54 2.54 0.22
0.17 2.54 385.10 * 0.012 0.17 0.17 3.90 3.40 2.53 2.54 0.23
0.18 2.55 385.11 * 0.012 0.18 0.17 3.92 3.42 2.55 2.55 0.23
0.18 2.57 385.13 * 0.012 0.18 0.18 3.93 3.93 2.57 2.57 0.23
0.19 2.58 385.19 * 0.012 0.18 0.18 3.95 3.95 2.58 2.58 0.24
0.19 2.60 385.16 * 0.012 0.19 0.18 3.97 3.97 2.60 2.60 0.24
0.20 2.62 385.18 * 0.012 0.19 0.18 3.98 3.98 2.62 2.62 0.24
0.20 2.64 385.20 * 0.012 0.19 0.19 3.50 3.50 2.63 2.64 0.25
0.21 2.65 385.21 * 0.012 0.19 0.19 3.52 3.52 2.65 2.65 0.25
0.21 2.67 385.23 * 0.012 0.19 0.19 3.54 3.54 2.67 2.67 0.25
~ 0.22 2.69 385.25 * 0.012 0.20 0.19 3.56 3.56 2.69 2.69 0.26
0.22 2.69 385.25 * 0.012 0.20 0.19 3.56 3.56 2.69 2.69 0.26
.��
BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES
Pipe data from file:16839BW3.bwp
Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions
^ailwater Elevation:385.93 feet
Discharge Range:1.87 to 2.87 Step of 0.1 [cfs]
Overflow Elevation:387.2 feet
Weir:NONE
Channel Width:2. feet
CB#2� _> �iB#2�
PIPE NO. 1: 25 LF - 18"CP @ 0.56$ OUTLET: 382.88 INLET: 383.02 INTYP: 5
JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 386.32 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 3.0 Q-RATIO: 1.26
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
****�************************+r***�**�*******r**********************,�***********
1.87 2.96 385.98 * 0.012 0.52 0.48 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.96 0.73
1.97 2.96 385.98 * 0.012 0.53 0.50 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.96 0.75
2.07 2.97 385.99 * 0.012 0.55 0.51 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.97 0.77
2.17 2.98 386.00 * 0.012 0.56 0.52 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.98 0.80
2.27 2.98 386.00 * 0.012 0.57 0.53 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.98 0.82
2.37 2.99 386.01 * 0.012 0.59 0.55 3.05 3.05 2.92 2.99 0.89
2.97 3.00 386.02 * 0.012 0.60 0.56 3.05 3.05 2.92 3.00 0.86
2.57 3.00 386.02 * 0.012 D.61 0.57 3.05 3.05 2.92 3.00 0.88
2.67 3.01 386.03 * 0.012 0.62 0.58 3.05 3.05 2.92 3.01 0.90
2.77 3.02 386.09 * 0.012 0.69 0.59 3.05 3.05 2.92 3.02 0.93
2.87 3.03 386.05 * 0.012 0.65 0.61 3.05 3.05 2.93 3.03 0.95
2.87 3.03 366.05 * 0.012 0.65 0.61 3.05 3.05 2.93 3.03 0.95
CB#22 => CB#21
PIPE NO. 2: 39 LF - 12"CP @ 0.56$ OUTLET: 383.52 INLET: 383.71 INTYP: 5
Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI
�,r��******x********,c**************,r********,r************,r**********************
0.83 2.32 386.03 * 0.012 0.39 0.37 2.46 2.96 2.29 2.32 0.53
0.87 2.32 386.03 * 0.012 0.90 0.38 2.46 2.96 2.29 2.32 0.55
0.92 2.33 386.09 * 0.012 0.91 0.39 2.47 2.97 2.30 2.33 0.56 �
0.96 2.39 386.05 * 0.012 0.42 0.40 2.48 2.98 2.31 2.34 0.58 I
1.00 2.35 386.06 * 0.012 0.43 0.91 2.48 2.96 2.32 2.35 0.59 �
1.05 2.37 386.08 * 0.012 0.44 0.92 2.49 2.99 2.32 2.37 0.61
1.09 2.38 386.09 * 0.012 0.49 0.43 2.50 2.50 2.33 2.38 0.62
1.19 2.39 386.10 * 0.012 0.45 0.44 2.50 2.50 2.34 2.39 0.69
1.18 2.40 386.11 * 0.012 0.46 0.45 2.51 2.51 2.35 2.90 0.65
1.23 2.92 386.13 * 0.012 0.47 0.46 2.52 2.52 2.36 2.92 0.67
1.27 2.43 386.14 * 0.012 0.98 0.47 2.53 2.53 2.37 2.43 0.68
1.27 2.93 386.'_9 * 0.012 0.98 0.97 2.53 2.53 2.37 2. 93 0.68
6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES I
The following special reports have been prepared for this project and are included in this section: �
6.1 Geotechnical Report by TeRa Associates, Inc., dated February 10, 2015
6.2 Wetland Report by Soundview Consultants dated July 2014
6.3 Buffer Averaging and Enhancement Plan by Soundview Consultants dated April 24, 2015
16834.015.doc
6. 1 Geotechnical Report prepared
by Terra Associates, I nc. dated
February 10, 2015
,I �
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
� � �
, ; � .
�
� Copperwood
� SE 136th Street and 143rd Avenue SE
� Renton, Washington
� ,
; j
Project No. T-6995
. . . �.
a�+�•--•� _.n. ., � ..�,. - , _ - --_ :
A r . ' " . _. . .' . ._ - � .. ..
. •-.'', 'S' .
'. <
Z
�� - ; - - �� Terra Associates, Inc.
, ,� . .
._ _ . ..
� � . . _ . . - . .
Prepared for:
Quadrant Homes
Bellevue, Washington ,
February 10, 2014 �
Revised February 10, 2015 �
, .
, . . � . � � �
� . . . . . . .
� ✓�; ��-�`�" �=ti TERRA ASSOCIATES, I nc. �
r-� . � ;�`��`
Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology
and
Environmental Earth Sciences
February 10,2014
Revised February 10,2015
Project No.T-6995
Ms.Bazbara Rodgers
Quadrant Homes
14725 SE 36th Street, Suite 200
Bellevue,Washington 98006
Subject: Geotechnical Report
Copperwood
SE 136th Street and 143rd Avenue SE
Renton,Washington
Dear Ms.Rodgers: .
As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report
presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction.
Soil conditions we observed in the test pits generally consisted of 6 to 12 inches of organic topsoil overlying 2 to
5 feet of inedium dense silty sand with gravel(weathered till)overlying dense to very dense silty sand with gravel
(unweathered glacial till) to the termination of the test pits. A thicker organic topsoil layer (18 inches) was
observed overlying these native till soils at Test Pit TP-9. We also observed about 18 inches of silty sand fill
material below 6 inches of gravelly topsoil at Test Pit TP-7. We would expect other areas of shallow surface fills
associated with the e�tisting developed parcels will be present. Shallow perched groundwater was observed at a
depth of about 4 feet at 3 of the 11 test pits excavated.
In our opinion, soil conditions observed at the site will be suitable for support of the proposed development
provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into project design and construction.
We trust the infomiation presented in this report is su�icient for yow current needs. If you have any questions or
require additional inforn�ation,please call.
Sincerely yours,
TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC.
Car e A
Pr a �
� �� �
J. r, Z I � _��'—
_ � •
Pres' �FC I��C ti�� CS�'
�s���1 Ai.�C'�
12525 bVillows Road NE, Suite 101, Kirkland,Washington 98034
Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (�">>) t321--�33�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0 Project Description.......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Scope of Work................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 Site Conditions................................................................................................................2
3.1 Surface................................................................................................................Z
3.2 Subsurface..........................................................................................................2
3.3 Groundwater.......................................................................................................3
4.0 Geologic Hazards............................................................................................................3
4.1 Seismic Considerations......................................................................................3
4.2 Erosion Hazard Areas.........................................................................................4
4.3 Landslide Hazard Areas.....................................................................................4
5.0 Discussion and Reconunendations..................................................................................4
5.1 General...............................................................................................................4
5.2 Site Preparation and Grading .............................................................................5
5.3 Excavation..........................................................................................................6
- 5.4 Slopes and Embankments...................................................................................6
5.5 Foundation Support............................................................................................7
5.6 Floor Slab-on-Grade........................................................................................... 7
5.7 Stormwater Detention Pond ............................................................................... 7
5.8 Rockery.............................................................................................................. 8
5.9 Drainage............................................................................................................. 8
5.10 Utilities...............................................................................................................9
5.11 Pavement............................................................................................................9
6.0 Additional Services....................................................................................................... 10
7.0 Limitations..................................................................................................................... 10
Fi ures
VicinityMap.........................................................................................................................Figure 1
TopographicVicinity Map................................................................................................... Figure 2
ExplorationLocation Plan.................................................................................................... Figure 3
CutRockery Detail...............................................................................................................Figure 4
Aqpendix
Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing........................................................................Appendix A
Geotechnical Report
Copperwood
SE 136th Street and 143rd Avenue SE
Renton, Washington
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,
The project consists of developing the approximately 12.7-acre site with 47 residential building lots, access
roadways, a stormwater detention pond, a rockery,and utilities. Based on the"Overall Grading Plan"prepared by
Barghausen Consulting Engineers dated October 8, 2014 cuts and fills required to establish design lot and
roadway elevations will be on the order of one to ten feet. There is an approximately four-foot tall cut rockery
planned along the west side of Lots b and 7.
Stormwater�vill be collected and routed to a detention pond located in the southeast corner of the site. The pond !
will be formed mainly by excavating below current site grade with construction of a small fill containment berm
along the east perimeter. The excavation required to achieve the floor elevations of 372 and 370 will extend 14 to
20 feet below current site grades. The fill depth required to achieve the berm crest elevation of 386 will range
from 2 to 4 feet. The pond berm width is six feet, with exterior and interior pond slopes graded at 2:1 and 3:1,
respectively.
We expect that the residentiat structures constructed on the lots will be two- to three-story, wood-framed
buildings with their main floor levels framed over a crawl space. Attached garage floors will be constructed at
b ade. Structural loading should be relatively light; with bearing walls caring loads of 2 to 3 kips per foot and
isolated columns caring maximum loads of 30 to 40 kips.
The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of the preceding
design features. We should review final design drawings as they become available to verify that our
recommendations have been properly interpreted and to supplement them, if required.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope of work was completed in accordance with our authorized proposal dated January 9, 2014.
Accordingly on January 17, 2014, we observed soil conditions at 11 test pits excavated between 6 and 10 feet
below existing site grades. Using the information obtained from the subsurface exploration, we performed
analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically, this report
addresses the following:
• Soil and groundwater conditions
• Seismic design parameters per 2009 International Building Code(IBC)
• Geologic Hazards per cunent City of Renton Municipal Code
• Site preparation and grading
� Excavation
February 10, 2014
Revised Februa�y 10, 2015
Project No. T-699�
• Foundations
• Floor slabs at grade
• Stormwater detention ponds
• Rockery
• Drainage
• Utilities
• Pavement
It should be noted that recommendations outlined in this report regarding drainage are associated with soil
strength, design earth pressures, erosion,and stability. Design and performance issues with respect to moisture as
it relates to the structure environment (i.e., humidity, mildew, mold) is beyond Terra Associates' purview. A
building envelope specialist or contractor should be consulted to address these issues, as needed.
3.0 SITE CONDITIONS
3.1 Surface
The project site consists of 7 tax parcels totaling approximately 12.7 acres located adjacent and southwest of the
intersection of SE 136th Street and 143rd Avenue SE in Renton, Washington. The approximate site location is
shown on Figure 1.
With the exception of the eastern parcel the property is developed with single-family residences along with
several outbuildings. The areas immediately surrounding the residences are landscaped with lawns and associated
bushes and flower beds. The eastern parcel is undeveloped and has a drainage that meanders through the property
from the northwest to the southeast. In the southeastern corner of the property the drainage becomes incised
creating a deeper ravine feature. Elevation relief from the top of the ravine to the base of the drainage is on the
order of 14 to 20 feet carried over slope gradients of about 50 percent. This portion of the site is moderately
forested with associated understory. Elsewhere the site topography is generally flat with slight elevation
undulations.
3.2 Subsurface
Soil conditions we observed in the test pits generally consisted of 6 to 12 inches of organic topsoil overlying 2 to
5 feet of inedium dense silty sand with gravel(weathered till)overlying dense to very dense silty sand with gravel
(unweathered glacial till) to the ternunation of the test pits. A thicker organic topsoil layer (18 inches) was
observed overlying these native till soils at Test Pit TP-9. We also observed about 18 inches of silty sand fill
material below 6 inches of gravelly topsoil at Test Pit TP-7. We would expect other areas of shallow surface fills
associated with the existing developed parcels will be present.
Page No. 2
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 2015
Project No.T-6995
The Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, Ki�Tg County by D.R. Mullineaux (1965) maps the site as Ground
moraine deposits consisting of a thui layer of ablation till overlying lodgment till (Qgt). Soil conditions observed
in the test pits are generally consistent with the mapped geology.
The preceding discussion is intended to be a general revie�v of the soil conditions encountered. For more detailed
descriptions,please refer to the Test Pit Logs in Appendix A.
3.3 Groundwater
We observed groundwater seepage at Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, and TP-5 during our exploration. The seepage was
observed at a depth of about four feet below cunent site grades at the contact between the upper weathered and
lower unweathered till soils. This shaliow groundwater seepage is common on glacial till sites and is the result of
precipitation infiltrating the upper more pen�ious weathered till soil and becoming perched on top of the less
pervious unweathered till. The seepage is seasonal and will fluctuate depending on rainfall amounts. This
seepage typically diminishes with the onset of the nornially drier sununer months and often times is absent in the
fall time of the year.
4.0 GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS
4.1 Seismic Considerations
Section 4-3-OS J.l.d. of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) defines a seismic hazard as " i. Low Seismic Hazard
(SL): Areas underlain by dense soils or bedrock. These soils generally have site coefficients of types S 1 or S2, as
defined in the International Building Code. ii. High Seismic Hazard (SH): Areas underlain by soft or loose.
saturated soils. These soils generally have site coefficients of types S3 or S4, as detined in the Internatiorial
Building Code. (Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009)"
Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in
water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine-grained
sand that is below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction.
The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and elinunates this
intergranular friction; thus,eliminating the soiPs strength.
Based on the soil conditions we observed and the absence of a shallow goundwater table, in our opinion, the risk
for liquefaction to occur at this site during an earthquake is negligible. The soils are dense and, therefore the site
is a Low Seismic Hazard per the RMC.
Based on soil conditions observed in the test pits and our knowledge of the area geology, per Chapter 16 of the
2012 International Building Code (IBC), site class "C" should be used in structural design. Based on this site
class, in accordance with the 2012 IBC,the following parameters should be used in computing seismic forces:
Seismic Design Paranreters(IBC 2012)
S ectral res onse acceleration(Short Period), SA1s 1.378
Spectral response acceleration(1 —Second Period), SM� 0.676
Five ercent dam ed .2 second eriod, Sps 0.925
Five ercent dam ed 1.0 second eriod, SD� 0.451
Values deternuned using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Ground Motion Parameter Calculator
accessed on February 9, 2015 at the web site http://earthquake.usgs.gov/desigiunaps/us/application.php.
Page No. 3
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 20l 5
Project No. T-699�
4Z Erosion Hazard Areas
Section 4-3-OS J.c. of the RMC defines an erosion hazard as "i. Low Erosion Hazard (EL): Areas with soils
characterized by the Natural Resource Conservation Service(formerly U.S. Soil Conservation Service) as having
slight or moderate erosion potential, and that slope less than 15 percent. ii.High Erosion Hazard (EI�: Areas
with soils characterized by the Natural Resource Consenration Service (formerly U.S. Soil Conservation Service)
as having severe or very severe erosion potential,and that slope more steeply than 15 percent."
The majority of the soils observed on-site are classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 to 15 percent slopes
by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the
Soil Conservation Service. Soils on the steep ravine slopes located in the southeastern portion of the site are
classified as Alderwood very steep. Over most of the site with the existing slope gradients, these soils will have a
slight to moderate potential for erosion when exposed. Therefore, with the exception of the steeper ravine slopes
the site is a Low Erosion Hazard area per the RMC. The steep ravine slopes would be considered a High erosion
hazard area per the R'VIC.
Regardless, erosion protection measures as required by tlie City of Renton will need to be in place prior to starting
grading activities on the site. This would include perimeter silt fencing to contain erosion on-site and cover
measures to prevent or reduce soil erosion during and following construction.
4.3 Landslide Hazard Areas
Section 4-3-OS J.b. of the RMC defines a landslide hazard area as "i. Lo« Laridslide Hazard (LL): Areas with
slopes less than 15 percent. ii. Medium Landslide Hazard (LM): Areas with slopes between 15 percent and 40
percent and underlain by soils that consist largely of sand, gravel or glacial till. iii. High Landslide Hazard (LH):
Areas with slopes greater than 40 percent, and areas with slopes between 15 percent and 40 percent and underlain
by soils consisting largely of silt and clay. iv. Very High Landslide Hazards (LV): Areas of known mappable
landslide deposits. "
Because of the slope gradient the drainage ravine slopes located in the southeastern portion of the site would be
categorized as a High Landslide Hazard area by the RMC. Appropriate building setbacks and buffers as
discussed in the following sections of this report will need to be implemented to prevent impacts to the slopes and
attendant properties.
5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 General
Based on our study, there are no geotechnical considerations that would preclude development of the site, as
currently planned. Residences can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native
soils observed below the upper 12 inches of organic surface soil or on structural fill placed and compacted above
these native soils. Pavement and floor slabs can be similarly supported.
Page No. 4
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 2015
Project No.T-6995
The native soils encountered at the site contain a significant amount of fines and will be difficult to compact as
structural fill when too wet. The ability to use native soil from site excavations as structural fill will depend on its
moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take
place during winter, the o���iier should be prepared to iinport clean granular material for use as structural fill and
backfill.
The following sections provide detailed recommendations regarding the preceding issues and other geotechnical
design considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and
construction specifications.
5.2 Site Prenaration and GradinQ
To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious material should be
stripped and removed from below the building lots and roadway areas. Generally, surface stripping depths of
approximately 8 to 12 inches should be expected to remove the organic surface soils. Deeper stripping
approaching 18 inches should be expected in areas such as in the vicinity of Test Pit TP-9. In the developed
portions of the site, demolition of existing structures should include removal of existing foundations and
abandonment of underground septic systems and other buried utilities. Abandoned utility pipes that fall outside of
new building areas can be left in place provided they are sealed to prevent intrusion of groundwater seepage and
soil. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill, but may be used for limited depths in
nonstructural areas.
Once clearing and stripping operations are complete, cut and fill operations can be initiated to establish desired
grades. Prior to placing fill, all exposed bearing surfaces should be observed by a representative of Terra
Associates to verify soil conditions aze as expected and suitable for support of new fill. Our representative may
request a proofmll using heavy rubber-tired equipment to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are
present. If excessively yielding areas are observed, and they cannot be stabilized in place by compaction, the
affected soils should be excavated and removed to fum bearing and grade restored with new structural fill.
Beneath embankment fills or roadway subgrade if the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive,
the use of geotextile fabrics, such as Mirafi SOOX, or an equivalent fabric, can be used in conjunction with clean
granular structwal fill. Our experience has shown that, in general, a minimum of 18 inches of a clean, granular
structural fill placed and compacted over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing swface.
The native soils encountered at the site contain a sufficient amount of soil fines that will make them difficult to
compact as structural fill when too wet or too dry. The ability to use native soils from site excavations as
structural fill will depend on its moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of
construction. When wet soils are encountered, the contractor will need to dry the soils by aeration during dry
weather conditions. Altematively, the use of an additive such as Portland cement or lime to stabilize the soil
moisture can be considered. If the soil is amended, additional Best Management Practices (BMPs)addressing the
potential for elevated pH levels will need to be included in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
(SWPPP)prepared with the Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC)plan.
Page No. 5
February 10,2014
Revised February 10, 2015 ,
Project No.T-6995
If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months, or if they are initiated during the summer and
extend into fall and winter,the owner must be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose,we
recoitunend importing a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements:
U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing
6inches 100
No.4 75 maximum
No. 200 5 inaximum*
* Based on the 3/4-inch fraction.
Prior to use, Terra Associates, Inc. should examine and test all materials imported to the site for use as structural
fill.
Structural fill should be placerl in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of
95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, as determined by American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM)Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction
should be within minus one to plus three percent of its optimum, as deternuned by this ASTM standard. In
nonstructural areas,the degree of compaction can be reduced to 90 percent.
5.3 Excavatioa
All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches, must be completed in
accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. Based on regulations outlined in the Washington
Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA), the upper two to five feet of weathered native soils and existing fill
soils would be classified as Type C soil. The dense native soils below four feet would be classified as Type A
soil.
Accordingly, temporary excavations in Type C soils should have their slopes laid back at an inclination of 1.5:1
(Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter, from the toe to the crest of the slope. Side slopes in Type A soils can be laid back
at a slope inclination of 0.75:1 or flatter. For temporary excavation slopes less than 8 feet in height in Type A
soils, the lower 3.5 feet can be cut to a vertical condition, with a 0.75:1 slope graded above. For temporary
excavation slopes greater than eight feet in height,the slope above the 3.5-foot vertical portion will need to be laid
back at a minimum slope inclination of 1:1. All exposed temporary slope faces that will remain open for an
extended period of time should be covered with a durable reinforced plastic membrane during construction to
prevent slope raveling and rutting during periods of precipitation.
The above infonnation is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants, and should not
be construed to imply that Terra Associates, Inc. assumes responsibility for job site safety. It is understood that
job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project general contractor.
5.4 Slopes and Embankments
All permanent cut and fill slopes should be graded with a finished inclination of no �-eater than 2:1. Upon
completion of grading, the slope face should be appropriately vegetated or provided with other physical means to
b ard against erosion. Final grades at the top of the slope must promote surface drainage away from the slope
crest. Water tnust not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the slope face. If surface runoff must be directed
towards the slope,the runoff should be controlled at the top of the slope,piped in a closed conduit installed on the
slope face, and taken to an appropriate point of discharge beyond the toe.
Page No. 6
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10,2015
Project No.T-6995
5.5 Foundation Support
The residences can be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils,
competent existing fill soils, or on structural fills placed above competent soils. Foundation subgrade should be
prepared as recommended in Section 5.2 of tivs report. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should bear
a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades for frost protection. Interior foundations can be
constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab.
Foundations bearing on competent native soils, competent existing fill soils, or on compacted structural fill can be
dimensioned for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (ps fl. For short-term loads,
such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable capacity can be used. With structural loading as
anticipated and tlus bearing stress applied, estimated total settlements are between one-quarter and one-half inch.
For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.35 can be used. Passive earth '
pressures acting on the side of the footing and buried portion of the foundation stem wall can also be considered.
We recoirunend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pcf. We recommend not
including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or disturbed by
future grading activity. This value assumes the foundation will be constructed neat against competent native soil
or backfilled with structural fill as described in Section 5.2 of this report. The values recommended include a
safety factor of 1.5.
5.6 Floor Slab-on-Grade
Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on subgrade prepared as recommended in Section 5.2 of this report.
Inunediately below the floor slab, we recommend placing a four-inch thick capillary break layer composed of
clean, coarse sand or fine gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will
reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting
of the floor slab.
The capillary break layer will not prevent moisture intrusion through the slab caused by water vapor transmission.
VVhere moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, such as covered floor areas, a common practice is to place a
durable plastic membrane on the capillary break layer and then cover the membrane with a layer of clean sand or
fine gravel to protect it from damage during construction, and to aid in uniform curing of the concrete slab. It
should be noted that if the sand or gravel layer overlying the membrane is saturated prior to pouring the slab, it
will not be effective in assisting uniform curing of the slab and can actually serve as a water supply for moisture
bleeding through the slab, potentially affecting floor coverings. Therefore, in our opinion, covering the
cnembrane with a layer of sand or gravel should be avoided if floor slab construction occurs during the wet winter
months and the layer cannot be effectively drained. We recommend floor designers and contractors refer to the
2003 American Concrete Institute (ACI) Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 2, 302.1 R-96, for further information
regarding vapor banier installatiou below slab-on-grade floors.
5.7 Stormwater Detention Pond
A stormwater detention pond will be constructed in the southeast corner of the development. The proposed pond
floor will be 14 to 20 feet below current site grades and formed by a combination of excavation and fill
containrnent benn construction.
Page No. 7
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 2015
Project No.T-6995
Our field exploration indicates that the soils in the area of the ponds will be medium dense to very dense
weathered and unweathered glacial till. These soil conditions exhibit low permeability and are inherently stable
and well suited for construction of stormwater detention ponds.
Fill used to form containment berms and construct slopes for the detention ponds should consist of native silty
sand with gravel placed and compacted as structural fill. If requirements of the King County Surface Water
Design Manual apply, the fill in this area must be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soils maximum
dry density as deternuned by ASTM Test Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor). Interior pond slopes below the
maximum live stored water level should be graded to a maximum slope inclination of 3:1. Slopes above the
maximum stored water level or on the pond exterior can be graded to a finished slope inclination of 2:1.
The pond that is located northwest of the drainage ravine could, as a result of seepage from the pond, cause
shallow soil instability on the ravine slopes. The potential for this development will be dependent on the pond
stored water depth and distance from the ravine slopes. At minimum, we recommend the pond design provides a
50-foot horizontal setback distance from the edge of the maximum stored water elevation in the pond to the crest
of the ravine slope. Based on the "Drainage Facility Plan and Details" prepared by Barghausen Consulting
Engineers dated October 8, 2014, a 50-foot setback from the top of the slope to the top of the pond has been
incorporated into the placement and design of the pond. Maximum stored water depth is at elevation 384. The
top of the pond at the closest point to the slope is at elevation 386.
5.8 Rockery
A rockery is not intended to function as an engineered structure to resist lateral earth pressure as a retaining wall ,
is. The primary function of a rockery is to cover the exposed soil face to reduce the potential for erosion. All
rockery construction should conform to the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Standard Rock Wall
Construction Guidelines.
We recommend limiting cut rockeries to a height of eight feet when facing undisturbed dense native soils. Where
buildings will be constructed above and adjacent to rockery construction, the foundations should be lowered to
prevent surcharge loading on the rockery. Foundation depths should provide for a theoretical 1:1 influence line
extending from the footing edge to pass beneath the rockery base. A detail illustrating a typical cut rockery is
presented on Figure 4.
5.9 Drainage
Surface
Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be
allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building areas. We recommend
providing a positive drainage gradient away from the building perimeters. If this gradient cannot be provided,
surface water should be collected adjacent to the structures and disposed to appropriate storm facilities.
Surface water must not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the crest of the site slopes and embankments.
Surface water should be directed away from the slope crests to a point of collection and controlled discharge. If
site grades do not allow for directing surface water away from slopes, then water should be collected and
tightlined down the slope face in a controlled manner.
Page I�'o. 8
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 2015
Project No.T-6995
Subsurface �
We recommend installing perimeter foundation drains adjacent to shallow foundations. The drains can be laid to I',
grade at an invert elevation equivalent to the bottom of footing grade. "The drains can consist of four-inch '
diameter perforated PVC pipe that is enveloped in washed pea gravel-sized drainage aggregate. The aggregate ',
should extend six inches above and to the sides of the pipe. Roof and foundation drains should be tightlined
separately to the storm drains. All drains should be provided with cleanouts at easily accessible locations.
Irifiltration
As described earlier, the glacial till soils observed in the test pits contain a high percentage of soil fines, are well
consolidated, and exhibit low permeability. The soils and geologic formation are not suitable for discharge of
stormwater using facilities that rely on infiltration.
5.10 Utilides
Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association(APWA)or
the City of Renton specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural
fill, as described in Section 5.2 of this report. As noted, depending on the soil moisture when excavated most
inorganic native soils on the site should be suitable for use as backfill material during dry weather conditions.
However, if utility construction takes place during the wet winter months, it will likely be necessary to iinport
suitable wet weather fill for utility trench backfilling.
5.11 Pavement
Pavement subgrade should be prepared as described in the Se�tion 5.2 of this report. Regardless of the degree of
relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and relatively unyielding before paving. The subgrade
should be proofrolled with heavy rubber-tire construction equipment such as a loaded 10-yard dump truck to
verify this condition.
The pavement design section is dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade soils and the traffic
conditions to which it will be subjected. For residential access, with traffic consisting mainly of light passenger
vehicles with only occasional heavy traffic,and with a stable subgrade prepared as recommended, we recommend
the following pavement sections:
• Two inches of hot mix asphalt(HMA)over four inches of crushed rock base(CRB}
� Three and one-half inches of full depth HMA
The paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDO"I�
specifications for'/z-inch class HMA and CRB aggregate.
Long-term pavement perforrnance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly-drained pavement section will be
subject to premature failure as a result of surface water infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their
supporting capability. For optimum pavement performance, we recommend surface drainage gradients of at least
two percent. Some degree of longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement surface should be expected
over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to seal cracks when they occur.
Page No. 9
February 10, 2014
Revised February 10, 2015
Project No. T-6995
6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Terra Associates, Inc. should review the final design drawings and specifications in order to verify that earthwork
and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in project design. We should
also provide geotechnical service during construction to observe compliance with our design concepts,
specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from
those anticipated prior to the start of construction.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report is the copyrighted property of Terra Associates, Inc. and is
intended for specific application to the Copperwood project. This report is for the exclusive use of Quadrant
Homes and its authorized representatives.
The analyses and recommendations present in this report are based on data obtained from the test pits excavated I
on site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until I
construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc. should be requested to reevaluate the '
recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. '
Page No. 10
,V ........... . .«�. _"
,� °� 8�'as;a-Ne�tor � . (soo;
r i
D � (Nwer WI I�a�er� SL 117ti `_<t
_ m " li�qh Schoo) :� I t?�•,c�
_ > � Mati
a
- - Aluance
= .; � hf U�• �C� ,f : 'r.� tit
y�' ; z N�i pth St o �
L = L
- v: 9th St - —
e � a
Krwanrs('ark �ti > ,� � Celebratior �
- r,F arr �• � v� i our5quare C'�urch =
_ �
:`J� iUt t I �,Z. t
_ �
Nl • ' rn
ro °n,
_ � 'J�6th St g kF blh S' NE b:��St � �
r RF Srn 5• �9 z
i
.`' a Henton lech�ical Coliege c = Henton Christien
Greenrrood Memo•�al A1E 4th St ; +� I ellowsFnp NC dtli St
d � ItiPrK f Ur1Pr�il I•ome z , lora o+�i�e
�� r s ���_ �•��i L.ir�e�an Chur
� � � 7
Ji�+i I•ei�d{�x�lemorial �#errtage 1'atk �� ;
'J. :•,c!'it �l I i.'n�t�r
� z
t
�
� � ., SITE - _
,- ?,,,_��; D s
� SE 2rxi 1�1 � �
� 5013 SE 2nd PI � '�
�-�, n S�9ti'�✓ ..
� �t�,'.
5
� �I 5!h,��
4� �.11`�`�„
� � N ':h��i�t
= Map!ewoad Park
s� !aarh s
ar�k �� 5�
■
m�s
�r `
:�
' ��� �
i •
.,( S/
. , ,"S- ''.51 Ron Reg�s Park
..•
y / c c �orL,s Ad
3
� 1/
,y�� ��r, l,�
s'` a •�� ��lh
�rlfany na�k d ' • � New Li{e Chu�
,n
At Renton
SF�58th gr S� ������� �
:�F�60th 5t
�
T .c, f�, 0 200o a000
s
t Cascade Yark ��"•-
Z �= !�.a��s, ```.,.,Y APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
u:,��:,.
REFERENCE: GOOGLE MAPS 2/10/2014
� � Terra VICINITY MAP
, •• Associates Inc. COPPERWOOD
RENTON, WASHINGTON
Consultants in Geotechnical�ngineering
Geology and
Environmental Eanh Saences Proj. No.T-6995 Date FEB 2015 Figu�e 1
i
I � �
� , ��
, r
_ ..4
� �
r ..
�
, �+
� �'� �
rave
�
�t S SITE
, �
,� �`` d �
' 6g1 �" .
, � > --;
,. o � Hei -�
, �-- o� , g
� , ; .�
; -
. � . -
� . . �_ _,.
J �
� '� �
� � Q � � �
r../ , ,
.- � �,
, .
f 4
I ' ' j 4
I � �1
\
� �.
\
.. __ , �. � r- -6 , . . ,
�,1 .{ ; -- -- ``�- � _ _-
� ....1 � ,,�..�� '
.�/'
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1:10000
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 t/2 0 11i1E
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 65 FEET �
REFERENCE: USGS MAPS, TACOMA, WASHINGTON QUADRANGLES 1991
� Terra TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
COPPERWOOD
Associates I11C. RENTON, WASHINGTON
• Consultants in Geotechnical�ngineering
Geology and Pro No.T-6995 Date FEB 2015 Fi ure 2
Environmental Earth Sdences 1• 9
�
� _....
_: :..... .
..Y.... -----
�__.___ �:._._.,.-- -� __......... .._._.. _._.._.......... .
........_r.— ..... _ . —_.,.— _ _....
......��,, _,,,4.....,„--._.e..:e„— -�,,,v�...; u .._- _ -.` /� �(��'+P�
.. rxaros�n
.........._ • — '-
�
_.....
_... -- �- -
:.:...T.
......_.
� `�_ ..- t, _"""" , �� • — � t�.
__
�_-- '. . . y L _
..
:
---- T��fFi81r—
.....
� ^� � s �� --�9in-PL � ----- ---- -- — — _ .
� •
,
� � --.ae-
----- - LL ;� v _ - ---- -- ----- ---, ---
'_� ......��.
.... :- : ....._.._: .. ._.........:... ' N ' .
_ � k-.,�...... � u � � '$ ' ��#
.:� . , _ . ..: _ _
. .
. , .
. --- . . .
.
_ „
. .
-'es"'' -�° ��-Y_=� . , . • -------- --- ---- ----- �.�.;y ,
' `.. f .,:. _ '�...
_ .• �
�T'. � j� / �i — _ -- -- "� — —_T� �:
1 � � � u � _ (' I i
, �. i � ...� �� t
��so I` ' ' �ae� . � ��'`: x�,eo� '�, � ..j ... ( ( I �
I �{ �i b :� ��`•. i �'� : ,s... _ :.:f � I
�,- ,�
BE'V7�iC PADryp.) i � zz 'a+ -i �67.10''.. i � :i 1� .. . �
¢EVA7qN y � d�P � I � �
... � � ' P-9 i; �. j ' � ��[ : • � I , i
....• :...
� �`� Z , ' - :' i
�, � .�.,��— � � ° r�: ��
�. �� ( � ...,.,o �; � � � �� � ::; � � � � �
: :
r �'I ;i . 'r • II � �
. I Ni , ::: • '•'.• I i �`'�A `OVEAA'.IE�PA10Oli
•i
.
:, ...-. , ..
.
.
- `.' 1 - I _
,• .. i . 'S � i'��! : ... � _ ''i Nk7NC bPCN SPACE i 10-�1N7CM DQSINO CROrN �
I FSEN010t1 SIRFAY
, : . :
�•
�
;` 3 ,,_�,� : . � :,,. ; : ::::r :i r ` ���� � ;
!�(� � � ��'�
�nso f - � ' :\�\:' � '`� ' �
TPJ r� � i �-�0 � �ei.io I ; , "'��. �'.� ��' I �-�:- � . ` j �
._ ;< S '. �, : ..4'� \�1.��' �-' �� I
n � ° r . i
' so z� :..... F
i '�
wu�� ��: , ;: : t .. � ..:-' xz�o'�. ` . ♦ .``+r i
4 I �' ;: � .,:.� . �•,��:•.. �\ �v�
..._ . : .
�°a° � � ' I �� "�'_, i x�i,a � f ��"';�\\:g.. ........... ....
-.. .. i . ..
,.�� . , .' � � : i : \\••''�:Yp � .........- .
;
..
�
�
J:. � � � .' i �� ....._ .\\'ti:, : .
:� ' .... t
-.. � -- :: � � .: j-�-...::-�: ''•\ .. ,1�.
:� ; `�.
1 ': ' .... �� .
.
PROPOSED 0 R WoOo i � :=' io - ,,�..:...,�: .. ? � ._, �: :�� i .:,`.. .:r
:_.. ,, ,` �':
PRO OSED , -_.- �...._ .� :' � q+ ,�.,� � �
. 1 _. . . : . �. , , ._....�..:? �
:...
�cs� , , ; 5 '� �� I - .., ,
. ��- '
_ \ ..
� _ ,.... _ __ - �. �-.h�,�•:�:... �
. . >
�uw wK oernas . , : x�3o �+ v.......... . , ``� � �
we , a...... , .�„ � aee.�a i `�,�o` ----.3ss..•-•-• ���� :\� � i
,
. �
, .._: _.��-::� , ... ..._. ___
�. :••. :� .. .
- . . y ; : "•.. ; _...
.,
,.
_ . : ;►i--_• .. � : .. _
� �
p :j� � .. :. ry.ifl .. `
: : . . ...:' ,......q ! . . .. {'� '_'_.
7 : \
: , {
:' ; �.
i ; 1 '� l�
:: : ' ' �` ..... ..
+�4 ..., �
( : \�
. :�'�1� ' ..' • � . �.� . : :' f ; '�"`l � ��t `\ �• „`�v ����'�•• �
•! I \
.�...�.::.
. '.
�� .
_�
::
.
' ::
� ` �•
' .:;! \ ..6 ... . :- ,. A�,. f{' I :M`�. . �� ��� `\ ..
. . -., . . :. 'i.....,
IX
:� -: � ' "
....
`•..�.
: ; � LC
A : . �\\ :' 7M30 �'s . �': �..�`�
S .!�. ::':Ps ; -�'�...� 7lt10; i � F]_] . 7A.A _ ��k� ,.
- :-: ;' � , ._... 7FWC�O�\\�• \` .
._ : : . . / ... . . ....
%_ . i � .. ....... .
. 1 'n :..::....�' `; . SFHPfD ppyEYY1Y . � �`.
. . :_. . �.�� �.
` ' ' �,�Ij : �I �`�� � �r ....._ � � U +�.���•�` ��'� \ '.. �. Y r
.._.J�`.`, ....,�
.::-.: .: : M \ � .\•..
i `� � .�� �" . -- � ��,
:`� RqES �+
7 .: y 1 !� „"--- � .�. � ,
� J�,50 ...� !.i. j,.. ]l610 1 .�,�p � -'� � SFE�@IRFFR R�TORAT1011.�'�. - ' � �I
}•'-` � i` ..` ��
� � -� u " � 1 -... ( �' " 'PINI PIEEyARED Bf '� . '�?s
y
� w sa:,o�r oo�,u�ns. TP� �"� �-�. i.
raoro�n noc�axr . i,'; - . xr., ;{ ' - u�.Aoa xi aaomc �" �
raoro n �• _ �� r
MNL(4�WV(IEIWQaRT. �1 ':. � : �-� ` �� � � __� •�Mf14W iR�Cf A � � �i
; _y' � i ` �o .'o �� �` ` .,a� ,� __ ` �j ��; � �- � '�' �
� ..��j�^...�.�--^- I � I S�.fO TP'. �S7AQ ( � � ' , i i r-��� ��� .tl+ �``` � . 'ib..` t :
:.....:. ,._ 1 �
.� � �� ' � � : : .. � , �r.: - •• , � � . icrs,-
..ar° � : � � � : ; : ' ' . ��.�..��.. �. .: �':. _ - )
' �, -. � , ,. . � , : _ .'7 ' .� i'�;i i�`::.`��� ' .�.. �j�:� lo Stw
I (, � M�0
I .r.. �,. '. �� � �� ��e.'
� .i
I �.:A .�� � ,j :j'� �
.,�.. . ..... � �'': ,. �:: �
�......._ . - .
w .. . � . ;_ � �, �
. �
eFr.opo--� °. >
• . ,1 h`,�i 4`:`�;.:�� ` . \` 1D15 S
. 1 , ♦ : 2
: --....i_.. ....._ �-.1N . +.. � � ., . • � ' ;�.t;�� �l>� ��` `� '{``� ; ''t..•:� ro E�
` k •
i� � ' •"._',;:..'•�
: ......... ..... , t �i ` .•� -------
., L Jl7.l0 �.00 ,` t0 �,- PlAMS FOl DEN�S� .._4� ��1 't-�. ���♦ � �` •.`.'..`:''':
. f �S ,-� .� .._,- � i � ��1�1 1 i . ����`�� ' '-'� :.'�
'. .: Cp�° �����i t ."'+-�.�""z I 1 1 \\�,. \�` `�� ���:;':•.i�: �
_. , �. . .. � ___'_�� ....
7HACf D � ' - r- -�----- . ;�i i i i . `:..'`:��. .`.-`� r�oE a
�`�:'.;=.:_��;:..
,� � }�--_-- � � �� _ ,,��, .. ...� ;, .: �=�� ' ,�
�URI� 7l7�D.......: ::� �. � ` � � 'j�i�.� _ `�\;;��� �� �{` FAgI�
--- �D �
•-...:� '�._ � _ }
'... ". ' . a c �'. ?� ' I i. ����I i+ � �
-__ .. . . } .� -_ ,� ��_: �,�,, .:', . P'6 iY�ii; - - �;1�ii ii � �'
, ,.. . � i l�k '�I
. ,. , _ . $., , � � ' � -----------_ .��,:, ,� �
i - ' �`=�-�-�� �_�-. '�_3�+-1- - ` I �i � � - -- _-- i���i ii'� _
I _
� _���_ o - ...: 't ; I � q ------ � i[i.� ��' ._. --------•
: �.. -
.
.'"� ..:'. _
��
:- ( i
. — _ _�.� :: :�.....1.._.'' ._..�. .�_�� .. i� -- �i���ry
f ��
� • � ''- 1 � i���i �� ,� �;.�': .y',/i� -. :
`� � ', . : - I� �� i �y�i = �i�r �n^ I.
.. � - �F' . , _ ., � _,,,,�� .'� �'iii� . ir �i�. .
... _.. •. ...: .
.. �
�'•.. � ..:s. � `: .=_:��'� � �J �-�`.� � I �,,. �: � t'.��'i� ' [. � � . /
i .: r �ld10 �-_ : JS/,.10 ...:- .7C---.._%�707.60 ]l6A0 ]Ed50 I ` �i���� ��i�ir i• .` y�
i �� . .: ::._: � : : ..:�� • �.I�. ����� -�'i ��� f
��� , � �. ; !
i . _ I . ��i.�, ., i,� �'$ �.
�:. �• ...
� .., . � : __ - .
i � � : ,__ ,
`-----== --- - _ . . �..... - _ -- - �
. ..,
.. � •-....�
- ........�--
.,� ,,. I''•� ``:• ���
., ... . � -
- ----- - '-- ' _..� . _ .'`.
.
�'. `., l
v� �.
:_ �
�
. }... _ �
.... ---- ---^-_ � ; .: :
: �. ....: _ _ ••. �' `-- -- �
:>`:. . `
r�arasm efr woo eF,vwa a�c ` .. - 10rws i n�r�w H.o�f�MMCF:�- : . . .: �. \�--�
•� : ,�:
.__...__ _ � ' '' • . : . : -
..
CqD�tqH M.(5EE wo6CJwE PINI) ` �:i''. �� : -:,
RANS�R OETALS� F1EM1qN(T9.) M ......_....... ._...._...._._. '� ; --- -- _
�
B
� � .���PUW FDR �� �! �.�JQKIIOIL MFA �`�
� �� �s
Dff
�
0 ��� 2��
NOTE:
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
THIS SITE PLAN IS SCHEMATIC. ALL LOCATIONS AND LEGEND:
DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.IT IS INTENDED FOR ��_� Terra EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN
REFERENCE ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR � APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION-TERRA 2014
DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. COPPERWOOD
REFERENCE: SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. ASSOCIC��PrS II1C. RENTON, WASHINGTON
• Consultants in Geotechnical�ngineering
Geology and pro No.T-6995 Date FEB 2015 Fi ure 3
Environmental Earth Sciences 1• 9
,,�
z \/�.� .
%A� `!,'�.�
.,,�,
� � /\\��j�'y. .
�,�%\���'/, ;�,
i�%�,,.�\�i'i
�.\.��,;;./�i;�,
�` 1' COMPACTED SOIL
r
o �` I
� 1 `, ;
z
a �
8'MAX 9 0 '
,;
o y
o x
�
p ; CRUSHED ROCK FILTER
MATERIAL,BETWEEN 2
0
�� AND 4 INCH SIZE WITH
LESS THAN 2% FINES
G
�
i
BUI�DING LOT
. ;�.� �r-��.<- ._.,;,h.- � 3"MIN
1.5'MIN �� �' GRAVEL BEDDING
T•.�
�:'•.li'�!i'.���`Z��: � .. �y
FIRM UNDISTURBED 4"MINIMUM DIAMETER
SOIL TO BE VERIFIED DRAIN PIPE SURROUNDED BY
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CLEAN WASHED 3/4"DRAIN
KEYWAY �M�N� POINT OF DISCHARGE
KEYWAY SHOULD BE SLOPED
DOWN TOWARDS THE FACE
BEING PROTECTED
NOT TO SCALE
ROCKERY NOTES
1. REFER TO CIVIL GRADING DRAWINGS FOR
WALL ALIGNMENTS AND ELEVATIONS.
2.ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASSOCIATION OF R
ROCKERY CONTRACTORS GUIDELINES.
I 3. ROCK USEQ MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR ROCK QUALITY SPECIFIED IN SECTIONS 9-13.7(1)
OF THE WSDOT STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS(2008).
4.ALL CAP ROCKS MUST BE SECURE AND NOT ABLE
TO BE DISLODGED BY HAND.
���:� Terra CUT ROCKERY DEAIL
COPPERWOOD
••• •�• Associates, It1C. RENTON, WASHINGTON
Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering
�eoio9y and Pro No.T-6995 Date FEB 2015 Fi ure 4
' Environmental Earth Sciences 1• 9
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
Copperwood �
Renton,Washington I
On January 17, 2014, we completed our site exploration by observing soil conditions at 11 test pits. The test pits
were excavated using a trackhoe to a maximum depth of ten feet below existing site grades. Test pit locations
were determined in the field by measurements from existing site features. The approximate location of the test
pits is shown on the attached Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2. Test Pit Logs are attached as Figures A-2
through A-12.
A geologist from our office conducted the field exploration. Our representative classified the soil conditions
encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and recorded water levels
observed during excavation. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification S}stem(USCS)described on Fiwre A-1.
Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits ���ere placed in closed containers and taken to our
laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is
reported on the individual Test Pit Logs. Grain size analyses were performed on selected samples. The results of
the�rain size analyses are shown on Figures A-13 tluough A-15.
Project No. T-6995
MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER nPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
Clean GW Well-graded gravels,gravel-sand mixtures, IitUe or no fines.
Gravels(less
` GRAVELS than 5%
� � More than 50% fines) GP PO��Y-9raded gravels,gravel-sand mixtures,little or no fines.
� m N of coarse fraction
v) � �N is larger than No. GM Silty gravels,gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines.
� c� > 4 sieve Gravels with
Z i� •°—�� fines GC Clayey gravels,gravel-sand-clay mixtures,plastic fines.
E
� o N
� � o Clean Sands SW Well�raded sands,sands with gravel,little or no fines.
� � Z SANDS (less than
QY L More than 50% 5%fines) Sp Poorly-graded sands,sands with gravel,little or no fines.
v o Y of coarse fraction
� is smaller than Sands with SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines.
No. 4 sieve �nes
SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures,plastic fines.
� (�� Inorganic silts, rock flour,clayey silts with slight plasticity.
m
°' SILTS AND CLAYS
� �' 'N o CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity.(Lean Gay)
p �o � Liquid Limit is less than 50/o
G c��o '�i OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity.
Z Eo
00
� � o MH Inorganic silts,elastic.
� � Z SILTS AND CLAYS
w � � o CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity.(Fat clay)
Z L Liquid Limit is greater than 50/o
� � ..
o p�-{ Organic clays of high plasticity.
�
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat.
DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS
N Standard Penetration � 2^OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPILT SPOON SAMPLER
W Densi Resistance in Blows/Foot
p Very Loose 0-4 � 2•4"INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER OR
cA Loose 4-10 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
= Medium Dense 10-30 1 WATER LEVEL(Date)
O Dense 30-50
V Very Dense >50
Tr TORVANE REAOINGS,tsf
Standard Penetration Pp PENETROMETER READING,tsf
Consistancy Resistance in Blows/Foot
� DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot
= Soft S�� 2-4 LL LIOUID LIMIT,percent
O Medium Stiff 4-8
V Stiff g_�g PI PLASTIC INDEX
Very Stiff 16-32
� Hard >32 N STANDARD PENETRATION,blows per foot
�� Terra UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
COPPERWOOD
Associates I11C. RENTON, WASHINGTON
.. Consultants in Geotechnical�ngineering
Geology and Pro No.T-6995 Date FEB 2015 Fi ure A-1
Environmental Earth Saences 1• 9
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-1 FIGURE A-2
PRWECT NAME: Conoerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton ashington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Janua 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: 1�/A
d
� z
W CONSISTENCY!
� � DESCRIPTION RELATIVE DENSITY � REMARKS
W Q �'
C fA
(4 to 6 inches ORGANIC TOPSOIL)
•----------------•-•--------------------•--•-•-----------------•-----------•----•---------------•--- --------------------------••--
�
�
Daric brown sifty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace
gravel,occasional cobble to 8 inches,moist. (SM)
2 (Weathered till) Medium Dense 21.1
, 3
4 -------•--------------•--•----------------•-----_..---•••--•------•------------...-- •----------•----._...•-•----••- 7.9
5 Gray silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace gravel, p�se to
cobbles to 8 ind�es. (SM) (Till)
Very Dense
6
7
Test pit tertninated at approximately 7 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
8
9
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface i�fonnation pertains only to ihis test pit locat'an and should Associates, �I1C.
not be interpreted as being indicative of other bcatlons at the site. Consuttants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental Earth Stiences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-2 FIGURE A-3
PROJECT NAME: CoQnervvood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton.Washington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7 2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
^ o
� �++ CONSISTENCYf
� DESCRIPTION 3e REMARKS
a RELATIVE DENSITY
w < 3
O d>
(2 to 4 inches dark ORGANIC TOPSOIL)
..•••••----------------••••••----
------------••------------------------•-•----------------�-------------------------•---------•--
Dark brown silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,moist.
(SM) (Weathered till)
1 Medium Dense
I
..__—_--------------------------------------•-••-----------------...--•----------------•--••• -•-•------------------------- 21.6
2
3 Dense to
Gray silry SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,moist. Very Dense
(SM) (Till)
4
22.5
5
6
7
8
Test pit terminated at approximately 8 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
9
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface i�ortnadon pertalns only to this lest pit location and should ASSOCIat@S, �t1C.
not be interpreted as being indicative ot other bcations at the site. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Ernironmental Earth Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-3 FIGURE A-4
PROJECT NAME: CoDnervvood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH I
LOCATION: Renton.Washington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: 4 Feet DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
I
0
Vz
F � DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY! � REMARKS
a RELATIVE DENSITY
w < 3
o rn
(4 to 6 inches dark ORGANIC TOPSOIL)
--------------------�-�------------------------- ------------.__..�----------------- ---------••-••----•---•-----------
1 40.5
Brown silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace gravel, Medium Dense
2 moist. (SM) (Weathered till)
3
= 4 --•---------•----•-••---------------•-•.....--------------•-•-••-•-------------_........---•--------- -------------.___..._--- 25.7
5
�
Gray silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,moist. Dense to 12.3
g (SM) (Till) Very Dense
7
8
9
10
Test pit terminated at approximately 10 feet.
Groundwater seepage observed at 4 feet.
11
12
13
14
15
�-----� Terra
NOTE: This subsurface iniormation pertains ontyto this test pit IocaUon and should i Associates, �t1C.
not be interpreted as being fndicalive ot other IocaGons at the site. ' Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental Earth Sciences
�
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-4 FIGURE A-5
PROJECT NAME: Co�nerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton Washington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7 2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: 4 Feet DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
0
v Z �
F � ' DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY! e REMARKS
a RELA7IVE DENSITY
w ¢ 3
C N
(6 inches TOPSOIL)
-------------------- - --------------------------------------- -------------------------- ----•-•---•-•-----------------
1
Brown silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace gravel, Medium Dense 36.4
2 cobbles to 8 inches,moist. (SM) (Till)
3
= 4 -------------------------------------------------------------•-••---------------------------• -----------------------------
5 14.3
Gray silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace gravel,
g cobbles to 8 inches,moist. (SM) (Weathered till)
7
8
9
Test pit terminated at approximately 9 feet.
Groundwater seepage observed at 4 feet.
10
11
12
13
14
15
!, �. Terra
NOTE: This subsurface information pertains o�ly to this test pit Iocatfon and should ASSOC18t@S, �IIC.
not be interpreted as being indicative ot other Iceations at the site. Consultants in Geolechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental Earth Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-5 FicuRe a-s ,
PROJECT NAME: CoR�erwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH li
LOCATION: Renton,Washington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7 2014 DEP7H TO GROUNDWATER: 3.5 Feet DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
v Z
W coNsisreNcrr
DESCRIPTION X REMARKS
� � RELATIVE DENSITY
w a 3
c �n
(6 to 8 inches dark brown TOPSO�L)
1 Medium Dense
Brown silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace gravel,
moist. (SM) (Weathered till)
2
22.6
3
:
4 •---------•-•--------------------------------------------------.__.._�-------------------- ---•----•--------------------•--
5 Gray silry SAND,fine to medium�alned,trace gravel, Oense to 23.2
moist. (SM) (Till)
Very Dense
6
7
Test pit tenninated at approximately 7 feet.
Light groundwater seepage observed at 3.5 feet.
8
9
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface infortnation pertains only to this test pt location and should ASSOCI1t@S, �I1C.
not be interpreted as being indkative of other lotations at the site. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Emironmental Earth Scierxes
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-6 FIGURE A-7
PRWECT NAME: Co�nerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton Washinaton SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7 2014 DEPTH TO GROUNOWATER: WA DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
� d
z
W CONSISTENCYI
a � DESCRIPTION RELATIVE DENSITY � REMARKS
W ` 3
O N
(4 to 6 inches TOPSOIL)
--------------•----------•-----------------•------...---------------------------------...-•-----•---- -------------------...----------
1
Dark broMrt�sily SAND,fine grained,trace gravet,mast
2 to wet. (SM) (Weathered till) Medium Dense 20.3
3
4
5 ------------------_.__---------___..__ ._._-------- -------_______------
Gray silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel and cobble,
s moist to wet. (SM) (Till) Dense to 46.1
Very Dense
7
8
Test pit tertninated at appropmately 8 feet. ,
No groundwater seepage obseroed.
9
10
_ �� Terra
NOTE: This subsurface information peRains only to this test pit bcation and should ASSOCIBt@S, �(lC.
not be interpreted as being indicative oi other locations at the site. Consultants in GeotecMical Enginee�ng
Geology and
Erniro�mental Earth Sciences
I
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-7 FIGURE A-8
PROJECT NAME: C�onerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton.Washin�on SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: WA
� i
� DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY! � REMARKS
� � RELATIVE DENSITY
W < 3
c ar�
(4 to 6 inches daric GRAVEL TOPSOIL)
-----�----------------------•-••----------------------...•-----------....-------------------------- ----------------•---------------•-
1 FILL:brown silty sand,fine grained,Vace gravel,plastic Medium Dense
and brick.
11.5
2 ------------•--------------...._----------•••••••--•-------•-----•---•-------------------•--------- -----------------------------
3
Dense to 21.7
q Gray silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,moist. (SM) Very Dense
(Till)
5 �
6
7
8 19.5
9
10
Test pit terminated at approximately 10 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
11
12
13
14
15
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface informatlon pertains only to this lest pit location and should /4.SSOC18t@S, ��1C.
not be interpreted as being indicative oi other bcations at the site. ConsuNants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental EaRh Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-8 FIGURE A-9
PROJECT NAME: Copnerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton.Washinaton SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
vZ
F � DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY! e REMARKS
a RELATIVE DENSITY
w a 3
o �
(10 inches dark brown TOPSOIL)
--•---------------------•--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------•-----------•----
1
22.5
2 Brown silty SAND,trace gravel,moist. Medium Dense
{SM) (Weathered till)
3
4
5 •--•-----•-•--------••---.....---------------•-------------•--------------------------- --•-----•----•-•----------------
6 Gray silty SAND,trace gravel,trace cobble,moist. Dense to
(SM) (Till)
Very Dense
7 � 18.0
8
Test pit terminated at approximately 8 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
9
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface iniormation pertains only to this test pit location and should ASSOCIBt@S, �I1C.
not be interpreted as being irxlicative oi other locations at the site. Consuitants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental EaAh Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-9 FIGURE A-10
PROJECT NAME: CoRpervvood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton.Washington SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: January 7 2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
— o �
LL Z
x -W+ DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCYI e REMARKS
a � RELATIVE DENSITY
w < 3
o �
(18 inches dark brown TOPSOIL)
1
2 20.4
Medium Dense
3
Gray to brown silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,
moist. (SM) (Till)
4
5
6
Test pit terminated at approximately 6 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
7
8
9
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface informaGon pertains only to this test pit location and should /4.SSOC18t@S, �(1C.
not be interpreted as being indicative of other locatans at ihe site. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering
Geology and
Environmental EaM Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-10 FIGURE A-11
PROJECT NAME: Co��erwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: JH
LOCATION: Renton.Washin9ton SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: Januarv 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
d
� _
CONSISTENCY/
a � DESCRIPTION RELATIVE DENSITY X REMARKS I
w < 3
C N
(12 inches dark brown TOPSOIL)
1 -----------------------__•-------------•--•-----•-•-------------•-------------------•--------- -------------------------------- 19.5
2
Daric brown silty SAND,fine grained,trace gravel,moist.
(SM) (Weathered tili) Medium Dense
3
4
11.8
5 -------------•----•-----------
6 13.9
Gray silty SAND,fine grained,trace c,�avel,moist. (SM)
(Till) Very Dense
7
8
9
Test pit terminated at approximate�y 9 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
10
Terra
NOTE: This subsu�face iniormation pertains only to this test pit location and should ASSOCI1t@S, �t1C.
not be inte►preted as being indicative oi other locations at the site. Cortsultants in Geotechnical Engineering
C,eology and
Enviro�mental Earth Sciences
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-11 FIGURE A-12
PROJECT NAME: Coonerwood PROJ.NO: T-6995 LOGGED BY: _,!H
LOCATION: Renton.Washin9ton SURFACE CONDS: Grasses APPROX.ELEV:
DATE LOGGED: January 7.2014 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: N/A DEPTH TO CAVING: N/A
0
� _
x � DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY! X REMARKS
a � RELATiVE DENSITY �
w <
o w
(12 inches dark brown TOPSOIL)
1 --------••-----••••----....•-•---------•-------••-•••--------••••••-•-••-----.._..--•--•••••••••-- --------------------------------
16.0
2 Dark brown silty SAND,fine to medium grained,Vace Medium Dense
graveUcobble,moist. (SM) (Weathered till)
3
4
5 15.0
Very Dense
s Gray silty SAND,fine to medium grained,trace
graveUoobble,moist. (SM) (Till)
7
8
9
10
Test pit terminated at approximately 10 feet.
No groundwater seepage observed.
11
12
13
14
15
Terra
NOTE: This subsurface information pertains only to this test pt IocaUon and should ASSOCIBt@S� �I1C.
not be interpreted as being indicative of other bcations at the site. i Consultants in Geotechnical Ergineering
Geology and
Ernrirorxnental Earth Sciences
� � � • ' • •
�� �\�� ��',''.
♦ �
���. B�II��
.. : .�i�� .
:, � �GII.. ,, �,
��� �`.
, A��. �1►.\
. I.y� ��q
�►. �.,
., � ��i
, ► . �►,:
,��� _�
� iw�. ►
. �� .� :
�, b, ,
� � •-����
b�. i��
. _...:
.
Ilq
,
„ . . „ , ..
. . .
��� =� ��
� „ , , . . , ,
Q � � � � �i , � � , �
� � � �� � . .
1/���� ' . � � ' � ' � �� ' � ����
0�� , . .. ���_���
a��� � �.� �� � � ����
a�� .� , . , .. , , „ ����
: - � : . . � . . .
• . � . -
■ � � -
• � � -
. . ��� � :� . � • �-
• •��- ..�
- � . � � •�
• . . � _ .
■ � • � : � -
♦ � • ' � a • �
�
• •
�
Particle Size Distribution Report
� � o
< < < � � � � o 00(� 0Q (op g � g
f0 N � \ \ f7 � ik it it it 7L i! ii A
�0�
I � I I , I I I I I ' I I
I I I I I I I � I ' � I
90 �
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
$�
I I I I I I I I � I � I I
I I I I ( I I I I I I I I
7�
� I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
W 6�
Z I I I I I I I I ' I I I I
� I I ( I I I I f I I I
Z 50
U � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
w 40
a I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
30
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ! I
20
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
io
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0
�oo �o i o.i o.oi o.00�
GRAIN SIZE- mm.
a�o+3„ %Gravel %Sand %Fines
Coarse Fine Coarse' Medium Fine Silt Clay
0 0.0 2.4 15.1 83 23.1 31.1 20.0
❑ 0.0 40.7 9.8 5.1 10.? � 16.2 17.5
0 0.0 OA 11.7 83 14.3 � 36.1 29.6
LL PL D D D D D D C C
0 5.9985 0.5851 0.4113 0.2168
❑ 59.1490 25.2793 5.2022 0.2802
0 3.3745 0.3215 0.2114 0.0769
Material Description USCS AASHTO
o Silty Sand with some gravel SM
❑ Sandy Gravel with Silt GM
o Sil Sand with some ravel SM
Project No. T-6995 Client: Quadrant Homes Remarks:
Project: Copperwood
Renton, Washington
o Location: Test Pit TP-5 Depth: 5.5 feet
❑ Location: Test Pit TP-7 Depth: 1 foot
o Location: Test Pit TP-8 Depth: 7 feet
Terra Associates, Inc.
Kirkland WA Figure A-14
Particle Size Distribution Report
�O ('� N \ � \ \ f`� � ik ik # ?t ii � ik 3�
10Q
I I I I � I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I i I
so ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
80
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
�o
I I I I I I I I i I I I I I
i I I I I I I I I I I I I
W so
Z I I I I I I I I I I I I i
� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Z 50
W I i I I I I I I I I I I I I
� I I I I I I I I I I I I I
a ao
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
30
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
20
I I I I I I I I I i I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
�o
I I I I I I I I I I I I I i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE- mm.
%+3" %Gravel %Sand _ %Fines_
Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay
0 0.0 7.2 I 30.1 13.4 � 16.1 16.8 16.4
0 0.0 59 ' 13.2 12.5 24.1 � 2I.4 22.9
LL PL D D D D D D C C
0 13.6418 4.0436 2.1157 03276
0 7.4198 1.0964 0.5793 0.1825
Material Description USCS AASHTO '
o Silty Sand��vith gravel SM
❑ Silty Sand�vith some gravel SM
Project No. T-6995 Client: Quadrant Homes Remarks:
�
'Project: Copperwood
Renton, Washington
o Location: Test Pit TP-10 Depth: 2 feet
❑ Location: Test Pit TP-10 Depth: 6 feet
Terra Associates, Inc.
Kirkland WA Figure A-IS
6.2 Wetland Report by
Soundview Consultants
d ated J u ly 14, 2014
WETLAND, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT
REVISED JULY 2014
------------ - - --- --
�OLL12��TL�LlT �OYLIZL��CL12�� �
Executive Summary
Sound��ie«- Consultants LLC «-as hired b}- Bar�;hausen Consultin�; Engineers, Inc. and Quadrant
Homes (Applicant) to delineate and assess ��-etlands, tish and v�-ildlife habitat, and/or other
potentiall}--regulated aquatic features on an approsimatel�- 12.68-acre site located �vithin the Cit�� of
Renton, �k%ashington. The subject propert}- consists of eight parcels (ILing Count�- Ta� Parcel
\umbers 15230�9043, 1�23059066, 1523059067, 15230�9093, 1523059100, 1523059170,
1�230�9201, 1�23059221) located in the Northwest '/a of the Southeast '/a of Secrion 15, Township
23 North, Range OS East, ��'.l�I. The areas incorporated in this assessment include both the subject
property and surrounding offsite areas located within appro�imately 11� feet of the subject propert��.
The proposed project (Copperwood Residenual Plat) u-il1 provide 47 additional single-familj�
residendal units, transportation impro�ements, and associated infrastructure �vithin the Cit}' of
Renton.
The subject property u�as investigated for the presence of potentially regulated �vetlands, drainages,
tish and �cildlife habitat, and/or priorin� species on �1pri1 2, 2014 and re-inspected in June 2014. i�To
potentially� regulated �vedands u-ere found onsite. One stream (liaple�vood Creek Tributar�- 0303)
�vas identitled on the eastern side of the propern. The Cit�- of Renton identifies �iaplewood Creek
Tributar�� 0303 as a Class 3 non-salmonid-bearing perennial stream. In the northern portion of the
propem•, the stream is lo�v-gradient �vith gently-sloping banks; however, in the southern portion of
thc property, the channel is located in a ravine with steeply sloped banks and several natural tish
passage barriers. The ra��ne associated �vith the stream corridor contain both Sensitive and
Protected slopes as classified b�• the Cin� of Renton. l�n artificiall}- constructed s��-ale u�th emergent
��-etland �-egetation u�as also found onsite draining into l�aple«�ood Creek Tributary' 0303. The s«rale
i� documented to have been constructed in 1993 as a landscape and drainage feature and is not likelyr
r��ulated b�� the City of Renton per Renton�funicipal Code Sections 4-11-230 and 4-3-050 L, nor is
it Like1�- regulated b}- the �t'ashington State Department of Ecolo�� under RC��' 90.48 or
36.70A.030(21). Both of these features �tiere addressed in the original ��'edand, Fish and `�'ildlife
Habitat Assessment Report prepared for the project dated �pril 21, 2014. Ho�vever, an
independent electrofishing study, previousl�� undisclosed to Soundview Consultants LLC and the
.�pplicant, identified fishes below a natural tish passage barrier in the southeast corner of the
property� classifying this onsite stream reach as a Class 2 salmonid-bearing stream. Follo�ving
disclosure ot the prior independent stud}-, a site �risit �vas conducted to verif}' the accurac� of this
assessment. Sound�-ie�v Consultants LLC's supplemental site visit idenutied salmonids below an
onsite natural fish passage barrier. Therefore, a small portion of�Iaplewood Creek Tributarv 0303 in
the southeast corner of the site must be reclassified as a Class 2 salmon-bearing stream, and minor
re��isions to the buffer management recommendations are necessarti- to address increased buffer
reyuirements.
The revised residential plat still includes 47 single-family residences, ne�v access roads, one
storm�vater tract, e�:tensive open space tracts, and associated infrastructure, and direct impacts to the
stream u-ill be entirely a�oided. In addition, proposed impacts to stream buffer are minimal and
limited to placement of a treated storm�vater outfall, minor grading, a pen�ious �valking trail, buffer
reductions, and buffer enhancement actions. Impacts to the buffer �vill be mitigated through buffer
a�-era�in�;and non-compensator}-buffer enhancement actions.
118G.0(10� BCF.�Quadrant—Coppecuood Residenrial Plat Sound�-ie�r Consultancs LLC
\l''edand,Fish and\V'ildlife 1 labicat Assessmcnt Rep�>tt 1 Re��ised�uh�l�,2014
Wetland Summa Table
Approximate A Regulated Under Regulated Under Regulated Under
Feature name Size Class Renton Municipal RCW 90.48 Clean Water Act
onsite Code 4-3-050
Constructed Swale lu'If \1_1 No No Aot Likcl��
Tributary•0303B 1401f ? Yes Yes Yes
Tributary 0303� 61�lE 3 Yes Yes Yes
� Rcnron\funicipal Codc 4-3-OSO.I..
�'.1rca suuch of t7a<�AV�-]8 in thc southc-astcm corncr uf the sir�.
`:Arca nunh��f:lag\V�-lti in thc n��rc�r:�[ern ihrce eu�.iners ut ch���Etc.
1 IRG.i�(xi� BCE/Quadrant—Coppenti•ood Residential Plat Sound�•iew Consultants L[.0
\\rcl:ind.[�ish and\\ildliFe f I:�Uirat:\�secsment Re��rt 11 Recised�ul� 14,Zfi14
Site Map
q �� ,�0 340
� ; -- - -
; , T--.� - -�- -i- - �� �� -
��._'` I I I I '__`� -
J
1 � I 1 I I
� � ( � G.!}SS 3 STR�A�A ) I 2 STREAAI
i�-
.� i � (I�RTH OF 8) I (�-I OF WiS)
�"+ ��------------ ;��=--L--1l-- �- �+-t= f a.r=�
_� _ �,
''-, i , .---- — �--- �...�
_; F^���������.r.���������������.����`���������". ��� �����/Y�'�
� a� �� �—.-� ___ la7pi9[ - _ � P !�<S 1.
�-� �- - r " ,:` - �•�'�'ii';
; �- -- - s �-`•r:
�. .{'_ i- I � � r� ` # �. ��
�-`� ' I� // - F � .. ��.��,'
� � - - . - - l � _ ~(, ____ _ � -
j'i _ e'� i � ': `J f�� ' -
�. � i � _' - ` � � � � f' � --.
. � i 1 _� ,�' � �_ __ _ � t , ,,
; �, � S �,_ �` : r� -- - '
' � �' - \
;� � � � -''" �- Ml1PLE WOOD TRIB�JTARY 03Q3
I �
,; �:' �L---"-� _ __ (CLASS3) _'
' �G �. C — ' .-; %
—��� I �I �`� / � . _. ' --
r^' � i'- � ��i�� % -�f :' - . .-r'I M1� _
��-y y�I ::T �r � '--� ,,y p ! ! _ r. - - .
�� ' - ��+s�_�.'_ ��.J 'i � �,'--- ----,-� � I .� �
�' � '-� 'f �! j r`- - --- '---`-� f' !� �1 ' (
Yr� —' ',�� � r~�J�' 1" �I � ��
I � � 'l �;� ��1' �: ;' _ '�`�� �
,� — cor�s�ucr�swat�_ _ - ; ` I
_� �'�` -_--�_—'__tCi.A.Ss 5} �- �� ' ,
J r k--' � � - - _ •_ - :
L '.
y � f�' � ' �� � � j - .•� _ r ��
i � j " �
� � . �_ r i - "i ,
� ,� -
! i � _
t � � ' � 1�
� ' - _- _ �' ��4 �
�'�. E7it�TING dRAtNAGE T f � �r- �� ;
�, �H��? , _ � i, yY4 �_� -
I�•-
�, � ` � ' � �
i ; '- - -- �- _ -r- -- � 5
� .1�� �. � '�� r-, � ` ��-'- -- --
i
I ' ��� —_ � � -� �
� �� i � � � ' ��. j� L��,� 3 j
`G..� r„I—�s,r., , -_ � '�
i = �� :2: ��r„v:�-s �.�. "�c� f
� -- :
�' f i EXISIING STRIJ�CTURES, • ��, +.y±-a' - �
,I (TyPICAL} , , •, t i� p �L'
I �,. , � .
4 \� r� \�� `�l ; s � .`i' `ti
\ —�` `� ,' �•`.,�'� ,� r'
�t � . ',i � �
_. _�,����. ! �i �I.' ��� � .
�'' � f-
��`� %}
� � - '
� :•-.. _ , t� i
� � ' - - _ _ — 5 , , . �
I b--
118G.0005 BCE/Quadrant-Copperwood Residential Plat Soundc�ew Consultants LLC
\�'edand,Fish and\C'ildlife Habitat Assessment Reporc lii Re��sed July 14,2014
Table of Contents
Chapter1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................1
Chapter2. Proposed Project...........................................................................................................................2
2.1 Project Location......................................................................................................................................2
2.2 Project Description.............................
....................................................................................................
Chapter3. �iethods..........................................................................................................................................4
Chapter4. Background....................................................................................................................................6
4.2 Topograph5�and Drainage Basin..........................................................................................................6
4.3 Local and National t�%etland In�entories.............................................................................................6
4.4 Vegetation............................................................................................................ ........6
............................
4.5 Soils...........................................................................................................................................................6
4.6 Prioritt-Habitats and Species.................................................................................................................6
4.7 Precipitation.............................................................................................................................................7
4.8 Prior Electrotishing Sunney...................................................................................................................7
Chapter5. Results.............................................................................................................................................8
�.1 Drainages..................................................................................................................................................8
Chapter 6. Regulaton-Considerations.........................................................................................................11
6.1 Local and State Re9uirements.............................................................................................................11
6.2 Federal Regulatory Considerations.....................................................................................................12
Chapter 7. Buffer Averaging and Enhancement Plan...............................................................................1�
7.1 Purpose and Need.................................................................................................................................1�
7.2 Description of Impacts........................................................................................................................15
7.3 i�Iitigation Approach and Best l�Ianagement Practices ...................................................................16
7.4 Buffer Averaging Efforts.....................................................................................................................17
7.5 Enhancement Actions..........................................................................................................................17
7.6 ��irigation Goals, Objecrives,and Pertormance Standards............................................................18
7.7 Plant 1�laterials and Installation...........................................................................................................18
7.8 �iaintenance &i�lonitoring.................................................................................................................20
7.9 Reporting..................................................................................................................... .............21
..............
?.10 Contingenc}� Plans........................................................................................ .......21
...............................
?.11 Early Closeout.....................................................................................................................................21
Chapter8. Closure..........................................................................................................................................22
Chapter9. Report Summary..........................................................................................................................23
Chapter9. References....................................................................................................................................24
Figures
Fi�urc l, Vicinit}� :�Iap..................... .....2
............................................................................................
1 1 SG.0pp5 BCE/Quadrant-Coppeiu�ood Residential Plat Sound�ieu�Consultants LLC I
\V�rdand,Pish and\C�ildlifr I labirat Asses�menr Report Iv Re�-ised�uh•14,2014
Tables
Tablc 1. Precipitation Summar}.........................................................................................................7
Table 2. Drainage Summar��–Constructed Swale.............................................................................9
Table 3. Drainage Summarti�–lfaplewood Creek Tributar��............................................................10
Appendices
,-�ppendil _�—ltetl�ods and Tools
.�ppendix B —Background Information
�-�ppendix C—Plant Species List
.�lppendix D—Site l�faps and Plan Sheets
1-�ppendit E — Biologist Qualifications
113G.1�Op5 BCF/Quadra�t—Cuppenx�ood Residential Plat Soundaiew Consultants LLC
\\edand,Pish and\\'ildlife I labitac:lssessmenc Repott v Recised�ul�•14,2074
Chapter 1. Introduction
Sound�-ie�v Consultants LLC ��-as hired b<< Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and Quadrant
Homes (r'�pplicant) to delineate and assess «Tedands, fish and wildlife habitat, and other potentiall�•-
regulated aquatic features u-ithin or adjacent to the proposed Copperwood Residential Plat. The
proposed project is located at�001 Southeast 2"`' Place �vithin the City'of Renton,�k'ashington. The
subject propert�- is situated in the North�vest '/a of the Southeast 1/a of Section 15, Tournship 23
, North, Range 05 East, `�-.�i. (King Counn� TaY Parcel Numbers 1523059043, 1523059066,
' 1523059067, 1523059093, 1�230�9100, 1�230�917�, 1523059201,and 1523059221).
The subject propert}-and surrounding areas �vithin 11� feet of the subject propern-«-ere in�-cstibated
for the presence of potentiall�- regulated «-etlands, streams, fish and �rildlife habitat, and/or priorih�
species in April of 2014 and re-inspected in June of 2014. �n additional supplementar�' site visit�vas
� conducted follo�ving disclosure of an old electrotishing sur��ey (Cedarock Consultants, Inc., 2006)
previously unknown to Soundvie�v Consultants LLC and the r�pplicant. The site investigations
idenufied one regulated stream and one non-regulated, artificiall�� constructed swale. The stream is
referred to as i�iaplewood Creek Tributary 0303 b}' the City�of Renton. No impacts are proposed to
the stream, and on1�- minor impacts are proposed to the stream buffer, ��-hich �vill be addressed b�-
buffer averagin� and enllancement actions.
The purpose ot this ��-�tland and tish and ��-ildlife habitat assessment is to identin- and asse:ss the
presence of �vetlands, tish and «�Idlife habitat, and/or priorit�- species on or near the subject
propert�' and to identif�� management recommendations for the proposed project. This report
includes conclusions and recommendauons regarding:
'� • Site description,project description, and area of assessment;
� Background research and identification �f potentiall�� regulared critical areas in the �-icinit�� of
the proposed project;
� Identification,delineation, and assessment of regulated wetlands and water bodies;
• Identification and assessment of fish and wildlife habitat and/or priorit5- species locat�d on
or near the subject property;
, • Standard buffer recommendarions,building setbacks, and development limitations;
• Proposed buffer reductions and temporar�-impacts;
, • Existing site maps detailing identified critical areas, standard buffers, proposed butfer
modifications, and non-compensator�� mitigation acuons, and
• Long rerm habitat management recommendations and impact minimization measures.
1156.000� I3CE/Quadranc—Coppernood Residential Plac Suund�ie�� Consultants I.L(;
�C'edand,fish and\\ildlife Habirat.\ssessment Report 1 Reciscd�ul� l�l,?i�14
Chapter 2. Proposed Project
2.1 Project Location
The subject property is located in the City of Renton near the eastern boundary of the ciry limits.
The subject property is situated in the Northwest '/a of the Southeast '/a of Section 15, Township 23
North, Range OS East, VZ'.I�i. and comprises eight parcels (King Count�� Tax Parcel Numbers
1523059043, 1523059066, 1523059067, 1523059093, 1523059100, 1�23059170, 1523059201, and
1523059221). A King Count}�tax parcel map of the subject property is presented in c�ppendix B.
To access the subject property from the Tukwila area, via lnterstate 405 northbound, take Etit 4
to�vard Washington-900/Bronson W'ay.Turn right onto ��'ashington-169 north. After approximately
360 feet, take the first right onto Sunset Boulevard North. After 0.2 mile, take the first right onto
Northeast 3`d Street. Proceed 0.9 mile and continue onto Northeast 4`� Street. Proceed 1.0 mile and
turn right onto Duvall Avenue Northeast. After 0.5 mile, Duvall Avenue Northeast turns slightly� to
the left and becomes Southeast 2"d Place. 'The subject property will be located on the right side of
Southeast 2°d Place after approximately 0.2 mile.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map.
NE��h 51 NE 4th St NE 4th St NE 4th St NE Slh S� NE Lt.
lesSchwab Un�udSutes - - -. , ,:.� ; r.�;�:.�: es .:�a �i
T��PCMIPf a � vOStO�(1C! - - - _
_ 'AE=..',1'
_ .•,.�_�t p _
.--:�_. nel�wa � � '� ^ �.� tiEJrdSt v `e'+
• � c} z
Herirage T NE.'M% 3 _ HE IM P: �ih'2rid�t �
Perk .y n
m
tiE�nd4 �' .z„ NE?�CSI � - _ � 2 �'EZry� SF13Ir:��;l m
n � � b� `
.. -� NClstq r�`� NFts7p 3 �. ' % � o = SLI'.?;d5t
o kE!uh � z a >
� . ... ���5� NE 1 ct St x T �Z` 3
� SEtnF� �Etc�St
SCI:tPI O
_:?ryepnD� �A��eh SESn051 Sp:�Sf
St?^,:51
SE 2nt1 Ct
SF2ntlPl � SFin9C1
= � �S EEt3G�n5t SE7nd�'I
r-�.�r�_ct�� � SE,��St � � -
n.scnoodDr � sp� � K :♦�� 'SE)37�nSt
5�3t MdDt¢wood
� `t _ Perk m
�.�r c Ss� � �
�E SE�V+� _ L ,�a� ' =tt.E�;P. ;E138Mv1:E
,L _
''n, p;
SE 139!h�I = '(;, SE 139th FM- s
Subject Propert�- : ; � >
> � � _ > - �
•a;stn 4F�fl F % =' o `n � m
�
n '�S+ ,,. S�", 3 3 y
-, _ 5(142�d$1 � - - ro R
, � ` 5E t_2nd St �$f 1<2ndS� �, \
- '> .-E� ' g > s 3 3 3 �A,meP
.r+u_ ; T � T 3 � c�f'
��' -..r ;,, r- T� Sf I43idi`I
9 �, �+ � � -
�
- .,
����on v' °i o r. Sf t t5ry
�M���"�aiie ' $� � ��� � � ��% 3
-�9d �r4Sinc� �"� ,'�, '..
.�
t5a , MapllwooA �" `P�"
�oaoh �3 ' � cdreo„�u " �
�a� :�
Source:Google Dfaps
]18G.0005 BCE/Quadrant-Copperw�ood Residential Plat Soundedew Consulcants LLC
��'etland,Fish and u'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report 2 Ret�sed)ul�14,2014
' li
� 2.2 Project Description
' The �pplicant proposes a single-famil�� residenrial de�-elopment�ti-ithin the appro�:imatel�� 12.68-acre
subject property. The proposed project includes demolition of all but one of the e�isting residences,
removal of scrap and debris associated with the previous residential land use, clearing and grading
for construcrion of approximatel� 47 residential housing units u-ith dri�-e��ra��s, parking areas,
associated utilities and infrastructure, and buffer reduction, averaging, and enhancement acrions. I
The proposed project«-ill also provide fully engineered stormwater tacilities to the Cit�� of Renton's ,
standards. The south�L est faciliaes will require placement of a storm�=ater outfall and pervious
«alking trail along «ith minor grading actions ��ithin the stream buffer and minor buffer reducrion
�-ia buffer averaging in the southeast corner of the site. �nST impacts associated �vith the installation
of this outfall, lo�v-impact trail, minor grading, and buffer averaging u-ill be mirigated for through
non-compensator}� enhancement actions. For further details, z�ppendis C pro��des a site plan of the
proposed project and mitigation dctails.
1]8G.0005 [3CE/Quadranr—Copperu•oodResidentiall'lat Sound�iewConsultantsLLC
\t'etland,Pish and\C ildlife Habitat.lssessment Repott 3 Recised Jul� 1�,�014
Chapter 3. Methods
The methods used to compl�- �vith Federal, State, and local assessment requirements are detailed
belo�v. Please see Appendis r1 for further details of inethods and tools used to prepare the report.
��'etlands, streams, and other potentiall}� regulated fish and u7ldlife habitat �vithin the subject
propert5- and offsite areas �vithin 115 feet of the subject property ��'ere incestigated, and potentiallj
re�nilated critical areas �vere delineated and assessed by qualified Soundview Consultants LLC staff
on �1pri1 2, 2014. A follo`v up site inspection �ras also conducted by Soundview Consultant's
Principal Scienrist on �1pri1 3, 2014 to eerify� staff tindings. Publicl}' available background data was
queried for documented wedands, streams, and/or fish and wildlife habitat on or near the site,
including the U.S. Geographic Sun-e�- (USGS) topographic map, the Natural Resources
Consen-auon Service (IVRCS) Soil Sunrey, National ��'edands Inventory (�1`�%'�, US Fish and
��-ildlife Service (L'SF��'S), ILing Count}- GIS data (il�Iap), Ciry of Renton GIS data, local
precipitation data (NOAA), and various orthophotographic resources. Graphics and maps detailing
background data such as site topograph}�, soils, vegetative buffers, basin area, and critical areas
inventories are provided in rlppendil B.
Potenual �-edand boundaries ��-ere determined using the routine approach described in the U.S.
.�rm�r Corps of Engineers' (L;S��CE) ��'etlands Delineation i�Ianual (LTSr,CE, 1987) as moditied by
the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers �Y•'etland Delineation l�ianual: �x'estern
�Iountains, Valle}�s, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (USACE, 2010). 14lethods described in the
��"ashington State`�G'etland Identitication and Delineation:�lanual�vere not used since this document
has been retired b}' the��G'ashington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in favor of the updated
CS.�CE methods. Ordinar�' High �!�'ater (OH���� determinations were determined using Ecolog��'s
mcthod as detailed in determining the Ordinar4 High ��'ater lfark on Streams in �x'ashington State
(Olson, 2008); definitions provided in RC��' 7?.55.011 (11} and ��'�C 220.110.020 (69); and
US�10E's Regulaton� Guidance Letter\�o. 05-0� Ordinary High��'ater 1�1ark Identification (USACE
2005).
Potential �vetland, stream, and drainage boundaries and storm�vater teatures �vere inspected,
delineated, and surve�-ed over several dates in .�pril 2014. The field assessment �-as performed by
Jim Carsner, Professional ��'etland Scientist;Jerem`� Do�vns, Principal Scientist and Environmental
Planner; and Hannah Blackstock, Staff Scientist. To mark the boundary bet�veen potential wetlands
and uplands, orange survey�or's tlagging �vas alpha-numerically labeled and tied to t-egetation or
�vood lath along the wedand boundan-. To mark the points where data was collected, pink
surve}-or's tlagging �vas alpha-numerically� labeled and ried at each sampling location. To mark the
boundaries of streams and drainages, blue sun ey-or's flagging u�as alpha-numericall��labeled and tied
to vegetation or striped flagging from prior assessments �cas verified. The location of each stream
and drainage boundary� flag and data plot was surve}�ed by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ,
The locations and features of identified features are described in Chapter 5, and sho�vn on plan
sheets in ��ppendil C. I
Follo�ving disclosure of a previoush unknown inclependent electrotishing surve�� performed on �
i�laplewood Creek Tributary 0303 (Cedarock Consultants, Inc., 2006), t�;-o qualitied Soundvie�r �
Consultants LLC Staff Scientists �rerified the location of the idenrified natural fish passage barriers
1 1)6.000� BCI:/Quadrant—Copperwood Residential Plat �ound�ie�r Consultants f.L,C
1V'etl�and,Fish and\�'ildliEc Habit�c:lcsessment Report 1 Re��ised Julc 14,31�14
on Jul�- 1, 2014. The onsite stream channel natural tish passage barriers �rere identitied usin�
methodologies described in Fi.rh Pa.rsage Bar77err and Sairface Ik%'ater DiL�erriora Screening A.rses.rvnent an�l
Przorzti�atiota ���a�7ual (WDF��', 2009). Natural fish passage barrier locations tivere marked using blue
sun e�-ors fla��ing tape that was numericall}'labeled and tied to each located barrier.
1156.00(i5 I�CE;`Quadrant—Coppenaood Residenrial Plat Soundeicw Consultants LLC
\C etland,Fi�h and\t'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report 5 Re�-ised�uh 14,?014
WETLAND, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT
REviSED JULY 14,2014
PROJECT LOCATION
5001 SOUTH�ST 2"°Pr�CE
RE�TON,WASHINGTON 98059
PREPARED FOR
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
1821� 72ND r'�VENL'E SOUTH
KENT,WASHI\GTO\ 980�2
QUADRANT HOMES
14725 SE 36"'S'rx�:�:�',SL iT�. 100
B�.1_I.E.vt��:,��':�sHrnGTo�98006
PREPARED BY
SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC
2907 H�xBoxviEw DiuvE
GIG H�IRBOR,��'.�Sxi:�GTot� 98335
(253) 514-89�2
`Soundv��� �'on�u�'tant� .
Chapter 4. Background
4.2 Topography and Drainage Basin
The surt-e}�ed topography of the site shou-s the landform as generall�� tlat with a slight rise in the
��-esternmost portion of the site and generall}� sloping toward the stream in the east. The banks of
the stream are shallow with lo�v-gradient banks in the north but transitions into a steep ravine as it
nears the southern property boundar�-. A King Countt- Topographic map is provided in
; Appendix B 1.
, 4.3 Local and National Wetland Inventories
The U.S. Fish and `�'ildlife Service's (USF��'S) National `�'edands Im-entor�- (N��'I) map does not
�
, identify any� wedands or streams on or near the subject properri-. The Cit�- of Renton s GIS maps
also do not identifj-�vedands on or near the subject property=; ho�cever, the Cin�identifies the stream
as a Class 3 u-aterbody on the subject propern-. Prior to the stream entering the subject propern- to
the north, it is identified as Class 4 water. The N��'T and City of Renton maps are provided in
Appendix B2 and B3, respectivel}-.
4.4 Vegetation
The majority� of the propern' is cleared and developed «-ith single-family residences. i�Iost of the
�-egetated areas are dominated b}�landscaped areas and mo��red lawn. The area containing the stream
corridor (I�ing County Parcel Number 1�2305906?) is the onl}- undeveloped portion of the subject
propertS�.
4.5 Soils
The NRCS Soil Sunrey of ILing Countt- idenutied one soil series, Alderwood gra�-e11�� sandtir loam, 6
to 1� percent slopes, on the subject property. A soil map is provided in Appendiz B4.
rllden�ood (AgC) series soils are considered non-h�-dric e�cept for inclusions of Bellingham,
\orma, Tuk�vila, and Shalcar that are associated with small depressions. Alderwood soils are
described as moderately a;ell drained soils on undulating to hilly landforms that have a dense, tirer�r
slo«�ly permeable glacial till at a depth of 20 to 40 inches. A typical pedon of the rllderwood (r�gC)
series is: 0 inch to 2 inches of a �-ery� dark brown gra�-ell}r sandy loam (10YR 2/2); 2 inches to 12
inches of a dark bro�vn gravelly sand�r loam (10YR 4/3); 12 inches to 27 inches of a gra�-ish-brown
gravelly sandy loam (2.5Y 5/2) with light olive bro«n mottles (2.5Y 5/6); and 27 inches to 60 inches
of a gra�rish-bro��rn till (2.5Y 5/2) with light oli�-e brown mottles (2.5Y �/6) and �vith light olive
bro��-n mottles (2.5Y 5/6).
4.6 Priority Habitats and Species
t`'ashington Department of Fish and ��'ildlife's (`�-'DF'���� Prioritt� Habitats and Species (I'HS) maps
and data identif�� a Biodiversity� l�rea and Corridor (Cedar Ri��er Valle}- Open Space l�reas) onsite,
primaril�� located in the riparian corridor associated ��-ith the stream. ��%DFtiY''s interactive data map
(Salmonscape) identities no streams «�ith fish presence «�ithin 300 feet of the subject propert��. No ��
I 1 S6.00�C» BCG/Quadcant—Copper��ood Residenrial Plat �ound�ie�c Consultan[s LLC I
\F'etl�nd,Fish and\�'ildlife Habitat.\ssessment Report 6 Re�ised Julr l4,?Ol$
priority habitats or Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant or animal species were identified
during this investigation. The PHS and SalmonScape maps are provided in Appendix B5 and B6,
respectivel`.
4.7 Precipitation
Precipitation data was obtained from the �lauonal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrarion
(NOt�) ureather station at SeaTac rlirport in order to obtain percent of normal precipitation during
and preceding the investigation. A summar��of data collected is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Precipitation Summary'
Date Day of Day Before 1 Week 2 Weeks Month To Water %of
Prior Prior Datez Year3 Normal�
.4/2/14 0.00 0.00 1.57 1.75 0 26.25 92°/a
' Data obtained from V0.�1A weathet station at SeaTac.liiport. (crr�:'i u��u��reather.�>r,�/clim ite inde�.�hn=��f_��=����i).
2 Precipitadon for the month is the same as for the Year-m-Dace.
' \Y'ater Yeaz is precipitation from Ocrober 1,2013.
° Percent of nonnal is sho�tm as for the dap/for the}'ear.
The precipitarion data indicates appro�imatel}' 1.75 inches of precipitation fell ���ithin the t�co weeks
prior to the last visit and precipitation was nearly normal (92 percent of normal) for the �vater year.
However, these metrics do not retlect the e�tremely� high rainfall encountered during l�Tarch 2014,
�vhich was 9.44 inches and 253% above normal. In fact, March of 2014 was the wettest I�Zarch on
record for the SeaTac record, surpassing the old record of 8.40 inches (National ��'eather Service,
2014). The precipitation data suggests that daily rain events mat�have caused areas not normall}-u-et
to become saturated and/or inundated at the time of the site im�esrigation, and such condirions «•ere
considered in making professional ��-etland boundarv determinations.
4.8 Prior Electrofishing Survey
A previous electrofishing survey u-as conducted by Cedarock Consultants, Inc. in 2006. This surve�-
documented fish presence in the East Fork of 1��laplewood Creek, which corresponds to the onsite
1�laplewood Creek Tributar�r 0303 herein. However, this prior assessment also identified a natural
fish passage barrier in the southeastern portion of the project site. Two adult cutthroat trout and si�
fry were documented during this electrofishing survey� just belo�v the plateau that creates the
lowermost natural fish passage barrier. Cedarock Consultants, Inc. recommended that the reach
downstream of the natural fish passage barrier be classified as a Class 2 stream and the upstream
reach be classified as a Class 3 stream per RI�iC Section 4-3-050 L.5. A map provided in this prior
surve�� report is included in r'ippendis B7.
118G.1)00� BCE/Quadrant—Coppen��ood Residential Plat Sound�-iew Consultants L.L.0
\l'edand,f=ish and\t'ildlife Habitat:lssescment Report 7 Recised�ul}�14,2014
Chapter 5. Results
5.1 Drainages
The site investigation identitied tt�-o aquatic features onsite, including one regulated stream
(ti�aple�vood Creek Tributary 0303) and one non-regulated, artificiall}� constructed s�vale.
Zfaple�-ood Creek Tributar�- 0303 runs north to south in the easternmost parcel on the subject
propert�- (ILing Countt� Parcel Number 152305906?). The constructed s��-ale runs �vest to east and
drains to the stream.
5.1.1 Constructed S��vale
The arriticially constructed s�i�ale originates trom a series of curtain drains and catch basins draining
adjacent areas and containing multiple single-family residences and discharges to an outfall located
abo�re �iaplewood Creek Tributan- 0303. The constructed swale e�hibited some �cedand
characteristics, including hydrophyric vegetation (reed canarygrass) due to lack of regular
maintenance on the drainage channel; however, the s��rale is documented as an artificial drainage
feature constructed in 1993 as a landscape and drainage feature as part of a storm«ater and
ground�vater management plan for the site. Therefore, the swale does not meet u-etland criteria as
defined b}- Renton l�Iunicipal Code (R:'�TC) 4-11-230 and 4-3-050 �f and should not be re�ulared as a
�vetland feature or stream. The feature also does not meet RC��'90.48 or 36.70r1.030(21) criteria for
regulation as a wetland or stream by the State of��'ashin�ton.
The artificiall�� constructed s�vale is documented to be of anthropogenic origin «:here no naturall��
derived channel had previousl�- e�isted, is kno��n to collect and convet- surface �vater and/or
groundwater from adjacent developed areas, and is non-fish bearing; therefore, the swale meets the
criteria of a non-regulated, Class � �vaterbod�� under R1ZiC 4-3-0�0 L.1.a.v. Class � v�-aterbodies are
e�empt from all regulations under Rl'�ZC 4-3-050 L. The outfall for this constructed swale would be
treated similarl�T; however, the outfall is located in the buffer far l�iaplewood Creek Tributar�- 0303.
This outfall can be removed as part of the buffer enhancement plan detailed in Chapter %.of this
report. �� summar�- of the constructed s�vale is pro�-ided in Table 2 belo«-:
�
ll8G.W0� BCEi Quadrant—Copperuuod Residencial Plat Soundcie�v Consulcan�s LL(;
I AV'etland,Fi�<h and\�'ilcllife Habieat-Assessment Reputt S Reci>ed Iiilti 1�,?i�l}
Table 2. Drainage Summary—Constructed Swale.
DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY
', � \t ' ,'. ���K:; Feature Name Constructed Swale
' � �
' ' �'� ��, ' „? � WRIA 8
�3� � � ��'�"`��,Y WA Stream Catalog# N/A
, '`�"� ' �, ' Local Jurisdicrion City of Renton
�^ ' �"• �'�'���� DNR Stream Type N/A
� �. r � .x� �:
f�+�.i .& :..: ; ,.,, :.,
�t'= �� . �,� '' i�,;. . Local Stream Rating Class 5,non-regulated
� ��'
�"`-a�f', ��r :;�.� � � f..�.�:! Buffer Width N/A
�'�•�- l i, �t� ��w.� s��� $x:ti�Y�- Documented Fish Use N/A
Location of Feature The swale is located on Parcel Number 1523059201
, The swale runs west to east, with water sourced from curtain
' Connectivity(where stormwater drains and catch basins in adjacent areas to the west. "The swale
drainage feature flows from/to) ends at an unmaintained outfall in the buffer of Maplewood
Creek Tributarv 0303.
Riparian/Buffer Condirion Class 5 �raterbodies are eYempt from regulaaon, and no buffer
is re uired.
5.1.2 Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303
The onsite tributary� to �laplewood Creek (0303) originates offsite in de��eloped residential areas to
the northeast and northwest of the subject property and discharges onto the subject property
through a culvert under SE 2"d Place. biaplewood Creek Tributar57 0303 flows southerly across the
property in a broad, low-flow channel with a low-gradient riparian corridor in the north with
increasingly steep slopes adjacent to the channel as it enters a ravine and approaches the southern
boundar}�. The stream leaves the subject propert}' and turns west to enter l�faple�vood Creek,
approximately 2,000 feet to the south and west of the property. Observed flo�vs indicated that the
' onsite poruon of the tributary is likely perennial; however, precipitarion for :�larch �vas above
normal, and there is a possibility that the stream may be seasonal.
North of the culvert under SE 2"d Place, the 14iaplewood Creek Tributartrn 0303 is idenrified as a
Class 4 waterbody by the City of Renton; however, once the stream enters the property from the
north, the Ciry of Renton identifies the tributary as a Class 3 waterbody. A report disclosed to
Soundview Consultants LLC and the Applicant by the City of Renton in June of 2014 identifies a
small onsite section of i4Taplewood Creek Tributary 0303 as a Class 2 wwaterbody�vith the rest of the
onsite stream being Class 3. r� clear and distinct natural fish passage barrier is located just upstream
of where salmonid fry and cutthroat trout were detected b}�Cedarock Consultants, Inc. in 2006. This
Class 2 designation in the lowermost reach of the stream �-as confirmed b}' Soundvie��� Consultants
LLC Staff Scientists on July 1, 2014.
The steep gradients and several natural fish passage barriers �vithin the onsite stream reach betz�-een
the Class 2 and Class 3 waters, including subsurface flows and a 10-foot vertical drop, indicate that
salmonids do not and cannot migrate up the tributary and are not likely present upstream of�vhere
salmonids��vere detected.
ll 8G.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Coppecwood Residendal Plat �e�und�ieu Consultanrs LI.0
�Y'etland,Fish and�k%ildlife Habitat Assessment Report 9 Re�ised�ul}�14,201�}
Table 3. Draina e Summa —Ma le�vood Creek Tributa .
DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY
'�� ` Feature Name ;�Iaple�c�ood Creek Tributar5- (0303)
',' '�� i i
` .W RIA 8
•R . . . t +��� 'i
n; '" i .' p ,t
�� '�.� �i,� � � � t; � ��/A Stream Catalog# 0303
+��� ; � ' . rE!� ��_ ..`}�
� t' � � ,l ��;.�•���{ Local Jurisdiction Citv of Renton
� �? ,;�� '� :,:,<A,�„ _ � "��k�
�`,;R,��'� a�,.�., �`;��s ".!��r� ,{DNR Stream Type N/A
�+�4, ' � ��,_+ , �'i � '.
"�`�; � s d�"�i ' :Local Stream Rating Class 2 Lower Reach (below W-18)
� 1 . � Class 3 U er Reach above W-18
�.�a�. .� ,:-�, :
� � Buffer Width 100 feet Lower Reach
; j� � � �,,i 75 feet U er Reach
. ��. �� � � - Documented Fish Use Fish obser�red in downstream
�•;,t� . •'}� � ortion of onsite reach stream
'I-hc ��n�itc segment of the tributarv is appro�cimately 755 feet (combined)
Location of Feature �on tlo�vin north to south in the westernmost arcel.
Connectivity(where The tributary drains residential and commercial properties to the north and
stormwater drainage feature enters the property through a culvert under SE 2°a Place. It leaves the
flows from/to) propert�in the southeast and enters I��fapleu-ood Creek appro�:imately 2,000
feet southwest of the ro e ,which eventuall�flows into the Cedar River.
The buffer of the onsite segment of the tributary is modified but contains
man}r native tree and shrub species. However, some portions of the buffer
Riparian/Buffer Condition onsite are dominated by non-narive invasive species in some areas and
contain manv iles of�-ard waste and other debris.
5.1.3 Stream Buffers
Of the two drainage features, only l�laple�vood Creek Tributary 0303 is required to have a buffer
under R1�IC 4-3-050 L.S.a.i.(b). The arrificially constructed drainage swale is identified as a Class �
«-aterbod}r, as described above, and is not likely regulated b}� the Ciry of Renton or other State and
Federal agencies; therefore, no buffer is required for this constructed feature.
��s a Class 2 and Class 3 stream, the Maplewood Creek Tributary�0303 requires a buffer width of 100
feet and 75 feet, respectivel}�. Onsite, the buffer consists of deciduous riparian forest with a canopy
dominated b�r black cottonwood and red alder. Some areas of the understory include native shrubs,
primarily salmonberr��, but many areas are dominated by Himala}-an blackberry and other non-native
invasive species. Portions of the offsite buffer are modified with moderate to high densit�r
development on adjacent properties to the east. In addition, a gravel drivewa�� and many piles of
}-ard waste and debris are located in onsite areas of the western portion of the buffer associated with
adjacent single-famil�� residences and maintained neighboring yards. �SUith buffer averaging and
minor buffer enhancement and restoration measures, the modified Class 2 and 75-foot Class 3
buffers�vill be more than adequate to protect stream functions.
11 h6.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Coppeni�ood Residendal Plat Sound�-iew Consultancs LLC
\t'edand,f ish and\\`ildGfe Habitat.lssessment Report 10 Re�-ised Julv 14,2014
Chapter 6. Regulatory Considerations �
The proposed project is located in the Cin- of Renton. The site inaesrigation identified one ��
regulated stream and one non-regulated s�vale on the propem-. No other potentially regulated ,
«-edands, streams, or other fish and wildlife habitat were identified on or �vithin 115 feet of the I
subject propert�-. The buffer area of the onsite stream is some�vhat degraded in the north, being '
�-egetated by� Himala�-an blackberr�; and other invasive species and containing a substantial number '
of�-ard�zraste and debris piles and a gra�rel drive«rayr. Local, State,and Federal regulaton-implications '
are addressed belo��:
6.1 Local and State Requirements
The constructed swale e�hibited some �vetland characterisrics, including hy�droph�tic vegetation
(reed canarygrass) due to lack of regular maintenance on the drainage channel; ho«-ever, the swale is
documented as an artiticial drainage feature constructed in 1993 as a landscape and drainage feature
intended to be part of a storm�-ater and groundu�ater management plan for the site. Therefore, the
s�z-ale does not meet ���etland criteria as detined b�� Renton �Zunicipal Code (Ri'�IC) 4-11-230 and
4-3-050 M and should not be regulated as a �vetland feature or stream. r1s the artificiall�� constructed
s«-ale is documented to be of anthropogenic origin u�here no naturally derived channel had
previousl�- eYisted, and as the swale is kno�vn to collect and con��ey surface �vater and/or
�-oundwater from adjacent de�-eloped areas, the swale meets the criteria of a non-regulated, Class �
«-aterbod�- under Ri�IC 4-3-050 L.1.a.v. Class 5 �-aterbodies are esempt from all regulations by� the
Citv of Renton under R1ti1C 4-3-050 L. The feature also does not meet RC`�' 90,48 or
36.70A.030(21) criteria for regulation b}�the State of��'ashington as a���etland or stream.
llapleu-ood Creek Tributar5, 0303 is identified on the northern onsite portion as a Class 3
���aterbod}'. ��ccording to Rl�iC4-3-050 L 1.a.ui., Class 3 waterbodies are non-salmon-bearing
perennial �vaters during �-ears of normal rainfall and require a 75-foot buffer. The do�vnstream, or
southern, onsite portion of i�iaplewood Creek Tributary 0303 is identified as a Class 2 �vaterbody.
�ccording to R1�iC 4-3-0�0 L 1.a.u, Class 2 �vaterbodies are salmon-bearing and perennial or
inrermittent waterbodies. A Class 2 waterbod}- under RlliC 4-3-0�0 L.S.a.i.(a) requires a one
hundred foot minimum buffer. The project is located a minimum of 75 feet from the Class 3 reach
of the stream, but storm�vater infrastructure must be located closer than 100 feet to the Class 2
reach; therefore, minor buffer averaging is necessarti� adjacent to the Class 2 designated reach. In
addition, placement of a peroious ��all:ing trail and treated storm�vater outfall are proposed «-ithin
the Class 3 buffer, and some minor grading (approximatel� 3,000 square feet) is necessar�- in the
modified Class 2 buffer. These addirional actions ��rill result in minor impacts, �vhich u7ll be offset
«-ith natural �-egetation enhancement and restorarion actions within the stream butfer. ��ny activity>
proposed �vithin the buffer must compl�� ��-ith the following standards as oudined in R1�iC 4-3-050
L.6:
a) Preservation ofNative Vegetation:Existing natii�e vegetation.rhall be pre.ce�ved to tbe ex-terlt po.crible,
preferaGly i9� cosuolidated area.r.
l�) Revegetation Required.• IYlhere�vater Gody �u�er di.rturbance ha.r occu�7ed in accmzlance 2vith e.x-e��rptioia
ar develop�rretrtpermet approval or•a�her�ctit�itie.r, reveget��ion lvzth ilatir�e vegetntion s/�a�l�e reqirirec%
I 1 tiG.lK�O� BCE/Quadrant—Copperwood Residenrial Plat Soundeie�c Consul[ants LI.0
\C�ctland,Fish aad\�'ildlife Habicar.lssessment Report 11 Reci�ed(uk 14,2014
c) Use ofNative Species: I�hett ret�egetation is required, appr-oved�latia�e.rpecie.r, or otber approp�zcrte.rpe�ies
�rattsrali�ed to the Puget Sortnd regiarz shr�ll l�e u.red. A varie�� of.�ecie.c shall Ge trsed lvhich serz�e as faod rr
shelterfronz cli�f�atic etitretrre.r and predato�:r, afZd a.r strircture a9ar�coi�erfor reprod�rction and r-earzrtg ofj-orrjr;.
d) Removal ofNoarious Species: IE�beri r•equir•ed a.r a cof�dztion of app�oval, rrrx�ror�s or�✓rld�sirnble spFrie.r
r�f plasrt.r sl�nll l�e remoa�e�l or co�7trolled ro a.r to not conrpete lt�it/� native vegetation.
e� Impervious Sr�rface Restrictions: [�'he�e imperviot�s sr�rfaces exist r�� bzrffer areas, ,rrrch i»�pe��rorrf
sts�faces sh�ll not fie istcreaserl or e.x�anded u�itbitt tbe bz�er•area. Tbe e�tettt of Z171�781��ioars srrifaces u�itl�i:z tl�e
Gr ffer area nray mzly be rear7anged zf t{�e reconfiguration of impen�ious.rrrrfaces nrzd r•e.rto��rfiotz of p�zor szsrfac��l
area.r ispart of an enhaszce�nentpropo.ral t/�at improve.r ecologzcalfs�nctiosz of the areapaotected by the Gr�er:
The buffer averaging and enhancement plan, as described in detail in Chapter 7, proposes remo�-a1
of non-native in�-asive species, yard �vaste piles, and the e�isting gravel dri�ewa}r and planting of all
disturbed areas �vith native species in compliance with these requirements. In tact, the value and
benefit of the buffer enhancement and restorarion actions proposed will greatl�r e�ceed the minor
and temporary impacts associated ��rith placement of the walking trail, storm outfall, and minor
grading near the storm pond. No impen ious surface currently esists or is proposed «-ithin in the
buffer area. In addition, buffer averaging �vill result in no net loss of stream buffer e::tent or
functionality (see site plans in r�ppendis C).
tllong u-ith providing enhancement and restoration actions, the project must meet the additional
criteria for permit approval described in R�'�1C 4-3-050 L.?.a and b, «�hich require that (a) as a
condition of an�= approval for an�- development permit issued, a native growth protecuon area must
be created containing the stream area and associated buffer and (b) the action must result in no net
loss of regulated area or ecological function in the drainage area. The native gro�vth protection area
�vill be established using a separate tract«�ith deed restriction per R141C 4-3-050 E.4.c. option iu. The
native gro«-th protection area will encompass all areas of the site east of the final buffer line detailed
on Sheet 3 ot Appendi� D.
As stated pre�riousl�-, the benefits of the proposed enhancement and restoration actions far e�ceed
the minor and temporary buffer impacts proposed by the project. In addition, a native gro�vth
protection area will be created to protect the stream and buffer in perpetuin-. ��C'ith the enhancement
actions proposed in Chapter 7 of this report, the nau�-e �ro��-th protection area�vill compl�- �vith the
standards set forth in R��iC 4-3-050 E.4.b.
d.2 Federal Regulatory Considerations
The results of the 2014 site in�-estigation identifled one stream and one e�cavated drainage s�vale.
liaplewood Creek Tributary- 0303 recei�-es ���ater trom natural and artiticial sources upstream of the
site and has a documented direct surface ��-ater connection to �vaters of the U.S. known to be
regulated under Section 404 of the Clean ��'ater Act (C�&'A). The drainage swale appears to have
been originall�� constructed in upland soils for the purpose of conveying stormwater runoff from
adjacent dri�e�ca�-s and residences and ground��ater from drainage sy�stems. The swale does not
receive�vater from any sources potentiall}'regulated under Section 404 of the C��'A. In a December
2, 2008 memorandum from the Emrironmental Protection Agenc�� (EPr1) and USACE, joint
guidance is pro`ided that describes waters that are to be regulated under section 404 of the C`�'A
(USACE, 2008). This memorandum �vas amended on February 2, 2012 �vhere the EP�� and
USACE issued a final guidance letter on waters protected byr the C`�'Ao
]186.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Copper��•ood Residenrial Plat Suund�ie«�Consultants LLC
1\'edand,Fish and\\'ildlife HabitaC.\sses�ment Report 1? Rc�ised luh 14,_'l)14
The 2012 guidance describes the following�vaters�vhere jurisdiction vvould be asserted: 1) traditional
navigable �vaters, 2) interstate waters, 3) «-etlands adjacent to traditional na��igable waters, 4) non-
navigable tributaries of traditional navigable �yaters that are relatively permanent meaning the��
contain�vater at least seasonall�- (e.g. tt�picall}' three months and does not include ephemeral�vaters),
i and 5) �vedands that directl�� abut permanent waters. The regulated���aters are those associated with
� naturall�r occurring waters and�-ater courses and not artificial waters (i.e. stormu-ater pond outfalls).
liaplewood Creek Tributai-�- 0303 fits the description of Item 4 and is clearl�- re�ulated under
Secrion 404 of the C`�'�1.
'I'he 2012 memorandum turther goes on to describe �vaters �vhere jurisdicaon would likelt� require
further anal�-sis: 1) Tributaries to traditional navigable �vaters or interstate ��raters, 2) ��'edands
adjacent to jurisdictional tributaries to traditional navigable�vaters or interstate �vaters, and 3) �X'aters
that fall under the "other�vaters" category�of the regulations.
In addition, the 2012 guidance identifies thirteen �z-aters or areas «�here jurisdiction ��-i11 not be
asserted: 1) L�'et areas that are not tributaries or open ��aters and do not meet the agencies regulator}'
definiuon of"wedands", 2) ��'aters escluded from coverage under the CV�'r'� b}' esisting regulations,
3) ��'aters that lack a "significant nelus: u�here one is required for a �vater to be jurisdictional, 4)
Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased, �) Arrificial lakes or
ponds created byr escavating and/or diking dn� land to collect and retain u-ater and u-hich are used
e�clusively for such purposes as stock �vatering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice gro��ring, 6)
r�rtificial reflecring pools or s�-imming pools excavated in uplands, `� Small ornamental ��vaters
� created b}- e�cavaring and/or diking dr�� land to retain ��ater for primaril�r aestheric reasons, and
puddles, 8) ��'ater-filled depressions created incidental to construction activity, 9) Groundwater,
including groundwater drained through subsurface drainage s}-stems, 10) Erosional features (gullies
and rills), 11) Non-u�edand s���ales, 12) Ditches that are excavated wholl`� in uplands, drain on1�-
uplands or non-jurisdictional waters, and have no more than ephemeral flou�, and 13) Ditches that
do not contribute flow, either direcdS- or through other�vaterbodies, to a traditional navigable �vater,
interstate «�ater, or territorial sea.
The drainage s��-ale identitied on the subject propertv lacks a defined bed and bank and was clearl��
constructed from uplands as documented b}- the prior lando«-ner. The source of u-ater that ma�- be
found �vithin this s��-ale is stormv�-ater associated �vith roadside runoff and a high ground��ater
collection sy stem. The e�cavated s«�ale identified onsite appears to fit at least 3 of the criteria (Items
7, 9, and 12) for which the agencies are directed not to assert jurisdiction over, ho�i-ever, previous
esperience �vith the Seattle Branch of the USACE's interpretation of the guidance indicates a�enc�-
staff sometimes «rill tn- to assert jurisdiction over such features. Ho�vever, it is highl�- unlik�l}- such
assertion of jurisdiction o�•er this s�t�ale is defensible gi�-cn the docum�ntation of the s��-ale.
Should the USi10E decide to assert jurisdiction o��er tlie s��-ale under Secdon 40=� of the C�\-'.�, the
project�vould still likel}- be covered under a simplitied CW�� Section 40� Nationwide Permit (N��'P)
29 for residential development projects as the limit of State and Federal permitting efforts under
Secdons 401 and 404 of the C`�G'A. Final determination of N��%P coverage, though not likel}�
necessary, is at the discrerion of the USr3CE, and other minor N��GP's, such as a N��-Z' 18, ma�� be
also be used to authorize this project.
118G.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Coppenrood Residential Plat S��und�ie�r C�>n�ult:ints[.LC
�Cedand,Fish and\t'ildlife Habitat:lssessment Report 13 Recisrd luh 14,?UI-t
Federal permitting efforts �vould also trigger Section 7 revie�v under the Endangered Species Act
(ESc,). The same permitting requirements �vould also trigger Secrion 106 re�-ie�v under the National
Historic Presen ation rlct (\1HPA) due to the eltent of land-disturbing actions. As no Federal ;
permitting is likelt� necessar}�, documentation for such additional revie�v requirements is not being '
prepared at this time and �vill not be prepared in the future unless USACE staff can justify a
re�ulator�� netus «-ith the proposed project.
1 1 iiG.WO� BCE/Quadrant—Coppectcood Residcntial Plat Soundrie�c Consultants LLC
\C'rtland,Fish and\V'ildlife Habitat Acsessment Rcpntt 1�3 Re�-ised Jul�-l4,�014
Chapter 7. Buffer Averaging and Enhancement Plan
The follo�cing sections present the proposed buffer a�-eraging and enhancement plan �vith minor
restoration actions to address the buffer impacts associated �vith the proposed project and satisf��
buffer width and native gro�vth protection area criteria. The proposed a�-eraging and enhancement
acuons attempt to closel�- adhere to local Crirical �reas Regulations specified in R��IC 4-3-050 L.�.d
and 4-3-0�0 E.4 and L.6-7, respectiveh-. The proposed buffer aeeraging and enhancement plan is
provided in Appendi�:D.
The buffer enhancement plan proposes to remove the Himala}-an blackberry and other non-native
in�asive �-egetation b}� pro��ding a chemical application (pre-treatment) of the invasive plants prior
to grubbing, u-hich would occur during the dn- season to minimize an� potential impact to
�laplewood Creek Tributan- 0303 and its do�mstream tributaries. ��ddirional enhancement actions
�vill include clean up and removal of the gravel drive�zTay and the significant number of�-ard waste
and debris piles located within the buffer to midgate for the addirion of a pervious �valking trail
along the perimeter of the buffer. This plan proposes enhancement efforts �vithin the stream buffer
�vherever needed at the discretion of the responsible �vedand scientist and restoration actions
wherever minor grading actions disturb the perimeter of the buffer such as stormwater outfall
placement and installation ot the stormwater pond. No actions are proposed that w-ill intrude into or
affect the stream channel. Please see Appendix D for planting specificarions and details.
7.1 Purpose and Need
_ The purpose of the proposed project is to provide additional residential units and associated
infrastructure within the Cit}- of Renton. The project proposes to develop a plat of fort}--seven (4�
residential units �vith all necessar�� parking, drivewa�-s, utilities and associated infrastructure. A
minimum 7�-foot protective buffer��rill be implemented to protect the regulated Class 3 stream and
an averaged 100-foot buffer�vill be implemented to protect the Class 2 reach of the same stream. In �
addition, only temporar}r impacts are proposed to onsite stream buffers through enhancement and
restoration actions. The project seeks to mitigate for the minor temporaryr impacts associated uTith
necessar`� placement of a treated storm«�ater outfall and grading in the onsite buffer area and
provide compliance with narive gro�vth protection area requirements.
7.2 Description of Impacts
No direct adverse impacts are proposed to ant� regulated critical area, as �Zaple��rood Creek Tributar�- I
0303 ���ill not be directl`�impacted by the proposed project. Ho���ever, the project proposes to place a
«Talking trail, treated stormu-ater outfall, approlimatel}- 3,000 square feet of temporary grading
«�ithin the stream buffer, resulting in minor temporary� impacts. Surface water and a portion of the
roof�vater from the proposed residenrial plat will be directed to a detention pond which �vill treat
and discharge stormwater into a dispersion trench which �vill direct the treared ��-ater to the stream
buffer. In addition, vegetation enhancement and restoration actions «rithin the buffer urill result in
temporary disturbance onlj�,�vith a resultant beneficial effect.
The existing buffer onsite is degraded by the dominance of invasi�re Himalayan blackbern�, the
presence of yard ��aste and debris piles, and the gravel drive�vay�. The dense blackbern- and �rard
� waste piles keep emergent vegetation suppressed near the stream channel thus causin� increased
118G.W0� BCE/Quadrant—Copperu•oodResidenrialPlat ���und�ie�cCuncultinc.LLC
�C�etland,Fish and n'i]dlife Habitatl�ssessment Report 15 Rccised�ulr 1 3,?u14
runoff and erosion to limit u-ater qualitt- functions within the buffer. The proposed project will
substantiall� improve stream buffer functions including enhanced wildlife habitat and improvements
to water qualit�� tunctions b� establishing a highl�� structured native plant communitc- and
constructing a protecuve fence �vith signage to prevent continued disturbance of buffer areas. In
addition, pedestrian access within the buffer�-i11 be contained b�- establishment of a lo�r-impact trail
s�•stem to curtail trampling of nati��e vegetation and inappropriate uses �vithin the buffer. Other than
the gra�-e1 areas proposed to be removed, no impervious surface currendy exists �vithin the buffer
nor is proposed to be placed in the buffer b}� the proposed project. The proposed project does not
propose to negativel}=impact offsite drainages nor will it be detrimental to an�other propertt�.
Onlv a small portion of the stream buffer �vill be temporaril}r impacted during installation of
penious �valking trail, outtall, and minor grading near the storm«�ater pond. The alignment of the
outfall has been designed to avoid signiticant natice conifers, and temporary impacts will be limited
to the smallest area necessar�- to allow installation located outside of OH��G'. Once installation of
these items is complete, the disturbed areas will be finish graded and replanted �vith native
vegetation. The extent of buffer enhancement and restoration actions proposed u-ill meet all native
grourth protection area requirements and �vill greatly� etceed an�- miugation necessary for the minor
and temporan�impacts associated with placement of the outfall.
7.3 Mitigativn Approach and Best Management Practices
'I'he proposed enhancement and restorarion plan is intended to provide an appropriate stream buffer
functions «-ithout loss of area and non-compensaton� enhancement and restoration actions for an}-
temporary impacts. The plan �vill also enhance the o�•erall buffer functionalit}r to meet native
grou-th protection area requirements. Onsite buffer areas are dominated by� Himalayan blackberry�
and contain significant numbers of yrard �vaste and debris piles. Proposed enhancement actions
include treatment and removal of invasi�-e vegetation, removal of �-ard waste and debris piles,
planting �vith native trees and shrubs, and establishment of an herbaceous understor`� to allotv the
return of a forested canopti• and enhance water qualin� and habitat functions of I�taple�vood Creek
Tributai�� 030�.
Impacts to the stream are being full�- a�-oided, and impacts to the buffer are being minimi-r.ed '�
through careful planning efforts and project design. Enhancement and restoration actions �vill occur
cc�ncurrentl�- �vith the de�elopment of the plat. Temporar}- erosion and sediment control (TESC)
measures will be implemented that consists of high-visibilit}r fencing (HVF) installed around native
��egetation within the buffer, silt fencing betu�een the graded areas and buffer, plastic sheeting on '
stockpiled materials, and seeding ot disturbed soils. These TESC measures should be installed prior
to the start of development or enhancement actions and activel}� managed for the duration of the
project.
�1 concrete ��ash water collection basin should also be installed awati� from the buffer prior to
cc�mmencement of construcuon activities requiring additional concrete work. All equipment staging
and materials stockpiles should be kept out of the buffer, and the area �vill need to be kept free of
s�ills and/or hazardous materials. All till material and road surfacing should be sourced from
upland areas onsite or from approved suppliers, and u-ill need to be free of pollutants and hazardous
materials. Construction materials along urith all construction �vaste and debris should be effectivel�-
managed and stockpiled on paved surfaces and kept free of the remaining wedand and stream buffer
area. Follo�ving completion of the residence, the entire site should be cleaned and detail �n�aded
I I Sfi.000� dCF,/Quadrant—Copperu•ood Residendal Plat S�nind��ic�c C�mwltxnts I.LC
\V�cdand,Fish and���ildlife Habitat,�ssessment Report 1G Rrciced �ulr I-1,?U1-1
using hand tools wherever necessan�, and TESC measures �vill need to be removed. In addiuon,
permanent stormwater treatment features �vill need to be implemented as designed b�- the project
en�;ineer.
7.4 Buffer Averaging Efforts
:1s a result of thc re-classificarion of the southeast onsite reach of the stream from a Class 3 to a
Class 2, buffer averaging efforts «�ill need to be made to accommodate the stormwater pond. ��'ith
careful planning, buffer�vidth modification using the buffer averaging standards set forth in RI�fC 4-
3-050 L�.d may bc applied to this project if several criteria for appro�-a1 are follo�ti�ed; inclucling,
buffer w-idth will not result in a net loss of ecological function, the total buffer area is no less than
the required standard, and the buffer standard is based on best available science. The buffer
averaging efforts for this project included an assessment of existing site conditions, critical areas and
physical limitations, stream class designation, and anticipated project needs. The proposed buffer
averaging efforts are very minor and attempt to strike a balance bet«=een these elements in a manner
that allo�-s the best use of the site�vhile maintaining the integritt�of the eYisting critical areas.
Careful planning and targeted implementarion of the buffer averaging exercise detailed on Sheet 2 ot
.-�ppendix D, along v�-ith buffer enhancement actions, «�ll help ensure that no addiuonal negative
impacts �vill be made to the critical areas identified in this assessment. Expansion of buffer areas
surrounding sensitive areas and implementation of effecuve restoration and enhancement measures
«-ill also help ensure that�-ater qualit�T and fish and wildlife habitat funcuons �vill be improved from
its current state. 'The buffer reduction is only� proposed �vithin the outermost ertent of the onsite
buffer where the stream uras re-classified as a Class 2�vaterbody. Increase in buffer area is proposed
an adjacent area that is situated between the proposed residences and the stream. The proposed
buffer averaging plan increases overall total buffer area on the site b}� 1,442 square feet (from
c�isting 1,730 square feet to the proposed 3,172 square feet). z�s the proposed acuons u7ll increase
o��erall buffer functionality, no net loss of buffer function or area is proposed.
-` 7.5 Enhancement Actions
Enhancement and restoration actions for the buffer include, but ma}'not be limited to, the following
r�commendations:
• Pre-treat invasive plants, such as En�lish iv}', Himala}'an blackberry, and Scotch broom,
�ro�Uing in the tributary buffer u�ith a ��'ashington Department of Agriculture approved
herbicide. After pre-treatment, grub to remove the in�-asive plants and replant all cleared
areas with native trees, shrubs, and�round co�-ers listed in Appendis C; Pre-treatment of the
invasive plants should occur a minimum of two weeks prior to removal;
• Remove gravel associated with the etisting gravel driveway and break up the compacted soil
«�ith a ripper attachment or tiller. Seed and plant disturbed areas;
• On1�- native trees, shrubs, and groundcovers listed in Appendix C, or substitutes approved
bc the responsible «etland scientist, �vill be used in disturbed areas to help retain soils, filter
stormwater, and increase biodiversity of macroinvertebrates (i.e. insects);
• ,-�n approved nati�,e seed mis will be used to seed the disturbed areas after plantin�trees and
shrubs; '
1 1 SG.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Cuppenrood Re�idendal Plat Suundcie�v Consultants LLC
\V�edand,Fish and 1�'ildlife Hahitat Assessment Reporz 1' Re�ised)ulc 14,2014
• `,I . , �i , , �
more frequentl5- if necessai-�-. ��Iaintenance to reduce the �iowth and spread of in�-asi���
� plants is not restricted to chemical applicarions but ma5=include hand remo�-a1,if�varranted;
• Dr}�-season irrigation will be provided as necessar�� b�- the properh� o«�ner to hel� en��.0
plant sun ival;
• Exterior lights will be directed awa�- from the tributar�T buffer�vhenever possible, :;
• Activities that generate e�ces�i��e noise (i.e. �enet-at�rs :�nd air conditi�nin� equi?-
be placed a�va� from the ri
7.6 Mitigation Goals, Obje�.. - - , .....: : __: : . ...._.._._ ......:... ...
The goals and objectiees tor the proposed non-compensatory� enhancement and restoration actions
are based on impro�-ing butfer functions to compensate for temporar�- impacts to the buffer. These
actions are capable ot improving«�ater quality and h}-drologic functions and pro�-iding a moderate to
high level of habitat funcuon for stream buffer-associated u-ildlife. The goals and objectives of the
proposed enhancement actions are as follo��vs:
Goal — Improve habitat functions associated ���ith the i�laplewood Creek Tributaryr 0303 buffer by
reducing presence of non-native invasive species and increasing presence of habitat features
and diversit�-�zithin the temporaril�impacted buffer.
Objective 1— Increase plant biodi�ersit}�in areas where Himalayan blackberry- and/or other
invasive species are dominant.
Performance Standard 1 — r'1 minimum of � native tree and shrub species �uill be
present��ithin the enhancement area in all monitoring�•ears.
Performance Standard 2 — The enhanced buffer area onsite �vill contain a
minimum of 50 percent narive species areal coverage b� Year 2, 60 percent
areal coverage b� Year 3, and 75 percent areal coverage percent b��Year 5 of
all strata.
Objective 2—Effectivel��control and/or eliminate invasive species from the stream buffer
enhancement areas.
Performance Standard 3—Non-native invasive plants will not make up more than
15 percent total areal cover in anj�growing season follo«ring�'ear 1.
7.7 Plant Materials and Installation
7.7.1 Plant Materials
�]1 plant materials to be used for enhancement actions«-ill be nurser�-gro«-n srock trom a reputable,
local source. Onl}r native species are to be used; no h�-brids or cultivars ���ill be allo��-ed. Plant
material pronided will be ty-pical of their species or variety; if not cuttings the�r will e�hibit normal,
densely�-developed branches and �-igorous, fibrous root s��stems. Plants ��-i11 be sound, health�-,
��igorous plants free from defects,and all forms of disease and infestation.
1]8G.U005 BCE/Quadrant—Copperu-ood Residendal Plac Soundeiew Consultants LLC
\V'cdand,Pish and\C'ildlife FIabitat A�sessment Repott 18 Retii�ed(ulr]�3,2014
If container stock is used, such marerials shall ha��e been gro��-n in its deliver}� container for not less
than sis months but not more than tti��o��ears. Plants shall not exhibit rootbound conditions. Under
no circumstances shall container stock be handled b��their trunks, stems, or tops. Seed miYture used
for hand or h�rdroseeding shall contain fresh, clean, and neu� crop seed mi�ed b�� an appro��ed
metl�od. The mititure is specihed in :�ppendil D.
�Vl plant material shal] be inspecred b}� the ��'etland Scientist upon deli��en�. Plant material not
conforming to the specifications belo��� �vill be rejected and replaced b�- the plantin� concractor.
Rejected plant materials shall be immediately rcmo�-ed from the site.
Fertilizer will be in the form of Agroform plant tabs or an approved like form. \Iulch �vill consist of
sterile wheat stra�v or clean recycled wood chips appro�imatel�� 1/2 inch to 1 inch in size and 1/2
inch thick. If free of invasive plant species, th� i��ulch marcrial i1�a� b� ���urcc�i tr��in �1�������
materials salvaged from the land clearing acti�-ities.
7.7.2 Product Handling, Delivety, and Storage
.�11 seed and fertilizer should be delivered in original, unopened, and undamaged containers sho��in�
«-eight, analysis, and name of manufacturer. This material should be stored in a manner to prevent
«-etting and deteriorarion. r�ll precautions customary in good trade pracrice shall be taken in
preparing plants for moving. `�Iorkmanship that fails to meet industr� standards will be rejectec�.
Plants will be packed, transported, and handled with care to ensure protection against injun• and
� from drying out. If plants cannot be planted immediarel�� upon delicery they� should be protected
��-ith soil, �cet peat moss, or in a manner acceptable to the project biologist. Plants, fertilizer, and
mulch not installed immediately upon deli�-ery shall be secured on the site to preeent theft or
tampering. No plant shall be bound�vith rope or u-ire in a manner that could damage or break thc
branches. Plants transported on open vehicles should be secured �vith a protecti�-e cocering to
pre��ent�vindburn.
7.7.3 Preparation and Installation of Plant Materials
The planting locarions shou�n in Appendi� D are approximate and subject to modification to m�et
site-specific needs. The planting contractor shall verify the location of all elements of the
enhancement plan u-ith the ��'etland Scientist prior to installation. The responsible ��'etland
Scientist reserves the right to adjust the locations of landscape elements during the installation
period as appropriate to the enhancement actions outlined abo�-e. If obstructions are encountered
that are not shown on the dra�vings, planting operations �vill ccasc until altcrnatc plant locations
have been selected by and/or approved by� the��'etland Scientist.
Circular plant pits �vith verrical sides will be excavated for all container stock. The pits should be at
least 12 inches in diameter, and the depth of the pit should accommodate the entire root s��stem,
The bottom of each pit�vill be scarified to a depth of 4 inches.
I�roken roots should be pruned �uith a sharp instrument and rootballs sh�uld be thorou�hl�� soaked
' prior to installation. Set plant material upri�ht in the planting pit to proper grade and alignment,
��'ater plant� thoroughl�• mid�va�- throu�h backtillin� and add �1�,n-oform tablets, ��'ater pits again
1 18G.000� BQ:/Quadrant—Coppenrood Residencial Plat Sound�iew Consultants LLC
\V'ctland,Fish and\��ildlife Habicat Assessment Report 19 Recised�ul��14,21i1-1
upon completion of backfilling. No filling should occur around trunks or stems. Do not use frozen
or muddy mi�tures for backfilling. Form a ring of soil around the edge of each planting pit tc> retain
«ater, and install a 4 to 6 inch la��er of mulch around the base of each container plant.
7.7.4 Temporary Irrigation Specifications
��'hile the nauve species selected tor enhancetnent are hard�� and t�-picall�- thri�-e in north�ti�est
conditions, and the proposed enhancement acrions are planned in areas«�ith sufticient h}-droperiods
for the species selected, some indi�idual plants might perish due to dr�- conditions. Therefore,
irrigation or regular �uatering �vill be provided as necessara for the duration of the first 2 �ro�ving
seasons�i�hile the narive plantings become established.
7.7.5 Invasive Plant Control and Removal
Invasi�re species to be removed include Himalay-an blackberr�r and all listed notious «-eeds. These
species can also be found nearbt�; therefore, to ensure these species do not e�pand follo�ving the
enhancement actions, invasive shrubs ���ithin the enhancement and restoration areas will be
pretreated ���th a root-killing herbicide approved for use in aquatic sites (i.e. Rodeo) appro�imateh-
30 da��s prior to being cleared and grubbed from the enure u-etland and associated buffer. The pre-
treatment u�th herbicide should occur prior to all planned mitigation actions, and spot treatment of
' an}' surviving other invasi�-e vegetation should be performed again each fall prior to leat senescence
for a minimum of 3 5-ears.
� .� maintenance program requiring annual remo�-a1 of invasi��e species �vithin all «�etland buffer areas
b�• a homeo��ner's association follo���ing project completion, and �vritten into the subdivision's
Codes, Covenants, and Restricrions, is also recommended. This program should start during the
earl�- summer of Year 1 of the monitoring program.
7.8 Maintenance & Monitoring
The applicant is committed to compliance �vith the proposed enhancement plan and overall success
c>f the project. As such, the applicant will continue to maintain the project, keeping the site free
from of non-nauve invasiee vegetation,trash, and�-ard waste.
The enhancement site will be monitored for a period of � }-ears «�ith formal inspections by a
yualified �&'etland Scientist. The maintenance/monitoring period ��-ill begin upon complerion of an
as-built plan and certification from a Professional ��'etland Scientist or Scientist with equivalent
yualitications certifying the mitigation was installed per the enhancement and restorarion plan.
,\tonitoring events will be scheduled at the time of construction, 30 da��s after planting, and late in
the first through final j-ear's gro�ving seasons in Years 1, 2, 3, and 5. r� closeout assessment�vill also
be conducted in �'ear � to ensure the adequate restoration and enhancement measures have been
provided.
�fonitoring will consist of percent cocer measurements at permanent sampling points, �valk-through
surve}�s to identify invasi�re species presence and dead or d��ing restoration plantings, photographs
taken at fited photo points, ��•ildlife obsen-ations, and verificauon of dispersion trench function and
general qualitatiee buffer function obsen-ations. Percent cocer of all herbaceous species tvill be
1 186.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Coppencood Residential Plac Sound�-iew Consultants LLC
\V�cdand,Pish and\C�ildlife Habitat Assescment Rep<�tt 21l Re��ised]uh-1�4,2014
measured along each transect at 30-foot inten�als using a .25 meter quadrant. Average values for
each site�vill be determined from all quadrants measured along each transect.
7.9 Reporting
Follo�uing each monitoring event, a brief monitoring report detailing the current ecological status of
the stream buffer, measurement of performance standards, and management recommendations vvill
be prepared and submitted to the Ciry of Renton «=ithin 90 da��s of each monitoring event to ensure
full compliance �-ith the mitigation plan, performance standards, and regulatory� conditions of
approval.
7.10 Contingency Plans
If monitoring results during the first 3 y�ears indicate that performance standards are not being met,
it may� be necessar5- to implement all or part of the contingenc}� plan. Careful attention to
maintenance is essenrial in ensuring that problems do not arise. Should an�-portion of the site fail t��
�neet the success criteria, a contingency� plan will be developed and implemented �vith City c�t-
Renton approval. Such plans are adapuve and should be prepared on a case-b�-case basis to reflec;
the failed miugation characteristics. Contingency plans can include additional plant installation, anci
plant substitutions including t}pe, size,and location.
Contingenc��/maintenance activities may include, but are not liinited ro:
1. Replacing plants lost to vandalism, drought, or diseasc, as neces�an-;
2. Replacing any� plant species �vith a 20 percent or grearer mortalit�� rate after 2 gro«�ing seasons
�vith the same species or native species of similar form and function;
3. Irrigaring the enhancement areas onl}- as necessar�- during dr}- «eather if plants appear to be
too dn-, �vith a minimal quantit�-of�vater;
4. Reseeding and/or repair of stream buffer areas as necessary� if erosion or sedimentation
occurs,or
�. Removing all trash or undesirable debris from the stream and buffer areas as necessar�-.
7.11 Early Closeout
If the Year 3 monitoring effort indicates all Performance Standards are being met, the Applicant
mae petition the Cin� of Renton for earlv closeout of the monitoring period. Such a petition ma�• be
made usin� tl�e Year 3 monitoring report and a«-ritten requcst to Cit�- of Renton staff_
118G.UI IQj BCE;Quadrant—Copperw•ood Residential Plat Jound�ie�t�Consultants LLC
11'etland,Fish and\F'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report 21 Rc�i�ed Juh�14,2014
Chaptc:r 8. Clusure
The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific applicauon
to the Copperu-ood Residential Plat. The}' have been developed in a manner consistent with tha�
level of care and sliill normall� e�ercised b}r members of the environmental science profession
currend}� practicing under similar conditions in the area. The conclusions and recommendation�
presented in this report are professional opinions based on an interpretation of information
currendy� available to us and are made �cithin the operation scope, budget, and schedule of thi.
project. No warranty, espressed or implied, is made. In addition, changes in government code�,
regulations, or laws may occur. Because of such changes, our observations and conclusions
applicable to this site may need to be re��ised wholl��or in part.
\�'edand determinations and regulaton�recommendations made b�� Soundview Consultants LLC are
based on conditions present at the time of the site �risit and considered preliminary until validated b��
the jurisdictional agencies. Validation of the extent and jurisdictional status of all potentiall�r
regulated features by the regulating agenc}' provides a certification, usuall�-�vritten, that the features
that �vill, or will not, be regulated bt� the agencies until a specific date or until the regulations are
modified. Onle the regulating agencies can provide this certificauon.
Since u�etlands and streams are d�-namic communities affected b}�both natural and human activities,
changes in wedand boundaries ma�- be e�:pected; therefore, delineations cannot remain valid for an
indefinite period of time. Local agencies t�'picallyT recognize the validiry of wedand and stream
assessments for a period of� �-ears after complerion of an assessment. De�elopment activities on a
�ite 5 years after the complerion of this report may require reeisions. In addition, changes in
�overnment codes, regulations, or la�vs ma�� occur. Because of such changes, our observations and
conclusions applicable to this site may need to be revised��rholljr or in part.
I 1 tiG.Ul1p5 E3CE/Quadrant—Cuppera ood Residential 1'lac Sound�ieu•Consultants[.1�
\C��'and,l�i�L a^,d\\ildlife H.iLirac:lssec�mrnc Repnrt ?? Re�ised l��l� 1-1,_'+i:;
Chapter 9. Report Summary
rlll tield inspecdons, jurisdictional �vedand boundary delineauons, OH��':�f determinations, habitat
assessments, and supporting documentation, including this Wetland and Fish & Wildltfe Habitat
Assessment prepared for the Co�erwood Resrdential Plat�vere prepared by, or under the direction of,
, Jeremy Downs, Jim Carsner, and Hannah Blackstock of Soundview Consultants �-�-�. Jerem}� Do�vns is a
Principal Scientist and Emrironmental Planner,Jim Carsner is a certified Professional �X�etland Scientist, and
Hannah Blackstock is a Staff Scientist. t1nt-de�-iarions and/or alterations to this document must be appro�-ed
by the aforementioned parties at Sound��ie�c Consultants �-L�. Please see ,-lppendis E for a description of
professional qualificarions.
Sincerel�-,
7/14/14
Jerem�r powns Date
Soundview Consultants I-I-�
2907 Harborvie�v Drice
k , Gig Harbor,WA 9833�
Office: (253) 5148952 ext. 004
Fax: (253) 514-8954
hannah(�sound�-ic�vconsultants.com
sws
' 4
7/14/14 b `� � ��o
, ames H. Carsner,PWS Date ,�S -. �
Kc�,�
' Soundview Consultants I-i-� ��,rejw�q �
2907 Harborc�iew Drive �
Gig Harbor,WA 98335 �+�►+o�'"
Office: (253) 514-8952 e1t. 008
Fax: (253) 5148954
j im�a�sound�-ie��•consultants.com
� 7/14/14
Hannah Blackstock Date
Soundview Consultants 7 ir
2907 Harborview Dri�-e
Gig Harbor,��G'A 98335
Office: (253) 514-8952 est. 004
' Fax: (253) 5148954
hannah��ound��ie�t-consultants.com
1186.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Copperu-ood Residenrial Plat Soundciew Consultants LLC
�\'edand,Fish and\\'ildGfe Habitat:lssessment Report 23 Re�-ised�ula 14,2014
Chapter 9. References
Barber, til., S. Cierebiej, and D. Collins. 2009. Fish Pas.rage Bn�7zer.c a�rrl Srr�face [k%'ater Dia'P)'JIOl1 SCI'PPIIIJIg
As.re.r.rr�zerrt artd P�zorrti�atiorr r�fanual. ��'ashington State Department of Fish and��lildlife. Ol�mpia,
WA.
Brinson, lf. 1�1. 1993. A I��drogeosriorphlc cla.r.rification for wetlands, Technical l�epo�� WI�I'-DE-4. U.S. r'�rm�r
=- Eng,ineer��'aterwaS-s E�periment Starion. �'icksburg, 1�1S. I
Co�vardin, L.1i. V. Carter, F. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classiftcntzon of[�etlatad.r aizd Deepavate�•
HaGitat.r of t/�e United State.r. U.S. Fish&��'ildlife Service. ��i'ashington D.C.
Renton 1�lunicipal Code. 2014. Section 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Co�.r of Engineer.r I�'etlancl.r Delirreatiosz�llajlr�al. Technical Report Y-87-
1, US Army Engineer��'atervvaj-s E�periment Station,Vicksburg, l�iississippi.
Granger,T.,T. Hruby,r1. I�IcAlillan, D. Peters,J. Rube�-, D. Sheldon, S. Stanley, E. Stockdale. 2005.
I!"etlands in I�'a.rhi�agtott State - l''olunre 2: Guidartce for Protectirrg as�d�1lai�agi�ig tY�etlanrl.r. ��'ashington ,
State Department of Ecolog}=. Publication #0�-06-008. Olympia,�x'A. [Apri12005]. I
Hadle�•, C. 2006. �lle»Jora�rdtr»r. S{�� Creek Preli�rlitlay Plat Fish Pre.ce�lce/Afise�tce Szaz��-.r - East Fork
.11aple�vood Creek. Cedarock Consultants, Inc. I��ay 9, 2006.
I iitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Paciftc l��orthu�e.rt Uni��ersity of �Y�'ashington 'I
Press. Seatde,��'ashington.
� I,ich�-ar, Robert ��'. and John T. Kartesz. 2009. 1\'o��f� Anrerrcart Digital Flora: l�atiorral I�etlatld Plant
I rst, version 2.4.0. U.S. Arm}- Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center,
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanoeer, N��', and BONc1P, Chapel Hill,
\C.
\IunsellOO Color. 2000. �'�1rsn.re110 soil color chart.c. Neur��'indsor,Ne�v York.
\atural Resources Conservation Service. 1995. H��dric Soil,r of I�a.r/�itxgtoj�. U.S. Department of
rlgriculture. ��'ashington D.C.
�Iatural Resources Conservation Service. 2001. H��d�rc SorLr Li.rt: Kirrg Co�rat��, [�''ashington. L'.S.
Department of��griculture. ��G'ashington D.C.
()lson, P. and E. Stockdale. 2008. Determilring tl�e Orrlrna3� Higl� l�ater��fark orr Streams in I�'a.rbr���tor�
.State. ��4'ashington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands & F.m-ironmental :'lssistance
Program, Lacev,��'r1. Ecology Publication # 08-O6-0Ol.
Reed, P.B.,Jr., D. Peters,J Goudz���aard, I. Lines, and F. �X-'einmann. 1993. Srr�plenle�rt to ���rtro�ral
List of Platlt Species That Occur i�r It'rtlanrl_c: Ao��b�t-e.rt Ke,i��r 9. U.S. Fish & ��'ildlife Ser��ice.
Supplement to BioL Rep. 84 (26.9).
11 tiG.�_�(�U� B(:{:;Qu:idr.mt—C��pFri�r�,cd Rr.idcndal Plat Juundciew Conwltancs LLC
� 1V�ctlsnd.Fish an�l\\ildlifc Habitat.1s•cssmcnt Rcpurt 24 Re�ised�ulc 1-1,?I�14
Sheldon, D., T. Hrub�-, P. Johnson, K. Harper, A. l�Ic�lillan, T. Granger, S. Stanle��, and
E. Stockdale. 2005. ��G'etlands in ��'ashington State - Volume 1: r� S�-nthesis of the Science.
��'ashington State Department of Ecolog}�. Publicarion #0�-06-006. Ol}�mpia,��'A. (i�farch 2005]
Sn�•der, Dale E., Philip S. Gale, and Russell F. Pringle. 1973. .Soil Ssrn�ey of Ki�rg County Area,
I�asbingtof7. U.S. Department of r�griculture, Soil Consei-�-ation Ser�-ice, in cooperation «-ith the
�k'ashington Agricultural Experiment Station.
U. S. r�rm� Corps of Engineers. 2008. Clean [f��rter��-1it Jurz.rrliction Follmvirrg the L'.S. Sipreme Comt°r
Decision in Raparao.r v. U�tited States �Carabell u L'nited St�ter. EPr'1/USACE. December 2, 2008.
U. S. rlrm}' Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regio�ral Ss�pplement to the Co�p.r of EagirJeer.r IYletla�z�l Delir7entio�r
:�fa�tstal.• Ik�e.rterit 11lorrritai».r, i%'alley.r, and Coast Region (IIer2.OJ, ed. J.S. �k'akele�r, R.��'. Lich�-ar, and
C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. �'icksbury, IISS: U.S. :�rm�- Fn�ineer Research and
Development Center.
United States Department of �griculture, �atural Resources Consereation Sen-ice. 2U10. I�ie/rl
Indictors of Hydric Soil.r in t/�e lirrited States, I'er.riofz 7.0. L.11. Vasialas, G.`�%. Hurt, and C.V. Noblc
(eds.). USDr,,NRCS,in cooperation u�th the Narional Technical Committee for H��dric Soils.
��Uashington State Department of Ecolog,y. 1997. tYla.rhingto��State I�etla�ld.r Irlelrtrfrcntron �r�rd D�li»e�rtioa
�1IQ�rrlal. ��'ashington State Department of Ecology�. Publication #96-94.
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997, Ik�ashington State [k'�etland.r I�le�rtflcatioiz ��r�l Delii7eation
lfa�rual. ��'ashington State Department of Ecolog�-. Publicaaon #96-94.
�X�'ashington State Department of EcologF�, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seatde District, and U.S.
Environmental Protection r�genc� Region 10. (Ecology�) 2006a. I�'etla��d��litigation i�z I��QSIJ111gI011
State— Part 1:Agerrc�� Policie.r atrd Gui�lance ([/ersion 1). ��'ashington State Department of Ecolog�-.
Publicarion #06-06-01 la. Ol}'mpia,��%,-�.
�
i
11��G.000� IICE/Quadrant—Copperw•ood Residenrial Plat Suund��ew Consultan[s[J.0
� \\ctland,Fish and\�'ildlife Habitat Ascessment Report �� Recised lulc 14,?lil4
Appendix A Methods and Tools
Table A-1. Methods and tools used to prepare the report.
Parameter Method ot Tool Website Reference
��'edand US,�CE 198? http://el.erdc.usace.arm}•.mi Environmental Laboratory. 198?. Corps of
DeGneation �t'etland 1/elpubs/pdY/�vlman87.pdf Engineers��G'edands Delineadon i�ianual.
Delineauon Technical Report Y-8?-1,L'S Arm} Engineer
1lfanual \X/aterwat-s Experiment Station,Vicksburg,
hlississippi.
Western http://wu�v.usace.army.mil U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 2008.Interim
�iountains, /av/cecuo/reg/inte_aridw Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Valleys,and Coast est_sup.pdf ��'etland Delineation Manual:\�'estern
Region Interim bfountains,Valleys,and Coast Region,ed.J.S.
Regional �x'akeley,R.��'.Lichvar,and C.V.Noble.
Supplement ERDC/EL TR-08-13.�'icksburg,`1S:U.S.
Army Engineer Research and Development
Center.
��G'edand USF1�'S / http://���vu�.fws.gov/nwi/P Cowardin,L.`i.,�'. Carter,F.C.Golet,E.T.
Classification Cowardin ubs_Reports/Class_I�lanual LaRoe. 1979. Classificarion of wedands and
Classification /class_ddepg.htm deep�vater habitats of the United States.
System Government Printing Office,�x'ashington,D.C.
H}•drogeomorphic http://el.erdc.usace.arm}�.mi Brinson,Df.D4. (1993)."A h}�drogeomorphic
Ciassificarion 1/wedands/pdfs/wrpde4.pd classification for�vedands,"Technical Report
(HGl��S}'stem f �x'RP-DE-4,U.S.Army Engineer VG'aterways
Esperiment Station,Vicksburg,�fS.
��'etland Renton l�funicipal http://u�ti�v.codepublishing ��'ebsite
Raung Code 4-3-050 Jf .com/wa/renton/
Stream Federal Ordinan� http://����v.usace.arm�•.mil Congressional Federal Register 33 Part 328
Delineati�n High��'ater\fark /inet/Eunctions/c�v/cec«-o Definition of VUaters of the United States.
Definition /reg/33cfr328.htm
Draft State http://ww-w.ecy.�va.gov/pu Olson,P. and E.Stockdale.2008.Determining
Ordinary High bs/0806001.pdi the Ordinarv High��Uater l�fark on Streams in
��'ater�fark ��'ashington State.��'ashington State
Protocol Department of Ecologv,Shorelands&
En�7ronmental Assistance Program,Lace�-,��'A.
Ecology Publication#08-06-001.
��4'edand I�ational\�'edand htrp://u-edand_plants.usace.ar Lichvaz,R.��'.2013.1'he National\w'edand Plant
Indicator Status Plant List,2013 mt-.mil/ List:2013 wedand rarings.Pht�toneuron 2013-49:
��'edand Ratin s 1-241.Published 17 u1t 2013.
Plant�ames USDA Plant http://plants.usda.gov/ \}Uebsite(see Appendix A)
Database
Soils Data NRCS Soil Survey' http://soils.usda.go�/use/h Natural Resources Conservation Service. ',
�-dric/ 2011. H}�dric Soils Lisr.Iiing Counn�,
��'ashington. U.S.Department of Agriculture.
VG'ashington D.C.
H�dric Soils King County Not available Natural Resources Consetvation Service.
Data Hydric Soils List 2001. Hydric Soils Lisr.King County, I
�X'ashington. U.S.Department of Agriculture. I
�x'ashington D.C.
"Threatened ��'ashington �://u1«v.dnr.wa.gov/nh Washington Natural Heritage Progtam
and Natural Herita e ata ublished 10/15/08 . Endan red,
11 hG.0005 BCE/Quadrant—Coppencood Residential Plat Sound��ew Consultants I.L.0
\1 cdand,Fish and\�'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report Re�ised Jul��14,2014
Parameter Method or Tool Website Reference
E:ndan�crcd Prn�nam � thrcatencd,and scnsiti�c plants of\t'ashin�t<,n.
Species and \�i�ashin�non S�ate llepartment of\atural
http://u-u�•l.dnr.«�a.go�/n Resources,��'ashington\atural Heritage
hp/refdesk/datasearch/wn Program,Oh�mpia,��'�1
hp�redands.pdf
��'ashington http://�vdf�v.�va.gov/hab/p Priority Habitats and Species (PHS)
Prioritt�Habitats hspage.htm Program Jfap of priorin-habitats and species
.�nd Species in project�-icinin�. �t'ashington Department of
Fish and\V'ildlife (��-DE1�').
NOAr1 fisheries http://�c�t�v.nu-r.noaa.�;ov/ �l'ebsite
species lict and F.SA-Salmon-
maps Listings/Salmon-
Populadons/Indes.cfm
and
http://�v�vw.nm fs.noaa.gov
/pr/species/
CSF«'S species http://���1r.fivs.go�-/�cesn�- �t'ebsite
lists b�•Counn• afwo/se/SE_List/endan�er
ed_Species.asp
Species of ��'DF��i'GIS Data http://wdfw.wa.gov/mappi �t'ebsite
Locai ng/salmonscape/
Importance
Renton�funicipal http://�����e.codepublishing \�'ebsite
Codc .com/��-a/rencon/
ll SG.00pS BCEi Quadrant—Copperuvod Residenria]Plat Suundciew Consultants I.LC
\�'etland,Fish and 1V'ildlife Habicat,lssessment Reporz Re�ised�ulc 14,2��1-1
Appendix B Background Information
This appendix includes a I�ing County Topographic 1lap (B1); USF�k'S National ��'etland Inventory
�1ap (B2); City of Renton Critical Areas l�iap (B3); NRCS Soil Survey l�Iap (B4); ��'DFti�'Priority
Habitat and Species :�iap (B�); and�!G'DF�k'SalmonScape :�iap (B6.
1186.0005 BCE%Quadrant—Cuppernood Residenual Plac Sound�-ie�c Cunsultants LLC
\V'rd:md,Pish and\�'ildlite Hahitat:lssessment Report Re�ised�uh 1},?(li�
Appendix B1 — King County Topographic Map
� � � �
� � � � v
� a o�c =
Y
_ i � �
� � � � ���
�� �' "�`��
i � �g
- . . oH�ia3: �,,j ?S;.�y Nlt�k. _ ��
' e�5
B
�aOJYMI � �y�F
i E
�,q.E
.�, g .�ll�)�C'.('1 �e
�� � � �x�
y� , � Pro�crt�' ��
,I�:y.�.ati�ctsE �� ' � +. ,s"",,, �
� .. - �r ''� ` � o���
'Q '�►-�►, � � �� ,•ti, ����
�
0 � ; �� � \ � ����
� � - � , � -.L ;��:_� ��
O -- . � ,, �B
� 3sanvmnnoo�� � C ' � g.��.�
v ��I i ° � � � ' �€��
Q i v � C s���
a �� � � � � �'� �,���
�
�s�� �
v � � : � � � � �y� ���� �
��Y�� �.� � __ � ;t. �� §�
�= . � �r �, � �g � �
� �- w��� i,� . ��� �s��� �
; ' -
� - , �;�avat • t t
�� �� � '-` � �g�� �
�' �h r �
t��� � �
# � �... � ��_� �
_. ,.� 1 � � �'�°,� �
`� � � � �, -�� —
���� � � �, ���� �
. �:
rt ��"� . � � �� �
P'l�'�E 7J �
,�`'' � � �����
�s _� u
� � � � �� � �
� � �� �
? r
� � (�g �-�B �
f �__-`� > �g
c 3 �
/j ��` �~� - �� � � � S��
, V p
` 3S3�YT7Y11f10 �h! ), � F�' s � � � �u�� a
� � / u a
r� -_ :_ y
� �y�I �. ..........� ��_ ....•.Cai.�_....���� ��C.
�f�F���: � � .� �.- � ,F � ���� �
11 SG.0005 BCE/Quadrant-Coppenvood Residential Ptat Sound�-iew Consultants I.LC
\C'cdand,Pish and\�'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report Re��ised Jule 14,31114
Appendix B2 — USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map
0
� � �
N C
� � � � � a � �
� � � o ; 8 � � �
� +�y
� � • • w � � O � � � � �
�. !
X
l0 LL 4 W W 1� J K
LL
� �"��"� Y. ���..� ��_.. LL '
`E'-: � � . �,+c`� ':� ?�
^ -�7 -1.... ��., ��� y :.G� - `'�
��t� 'X �� .i-a � .+ :
��t r :��^ �y' .��
� ',•.i.. '�;� �.`s
.;a
, '�' =.�. br =3 g
– ;��
� ' • '4�. .i��
,�.�.. ,..>.+, ,� ,� ,. a� 'f a, - `�8
�it :;:-�_ � ��� -� ��e t}j��}y �:33
, tfi� 39 � ;� ��� 1�i'� .'�5 B
O �� ���,�,��� � ��� � � �� �:+, e� 3��
,� ,��_[ .1 � - ! �`�`�;,1� �,�� n�
� ' ' �` - �
� . .��� ���a
�I f..-. ` �� �e�•�,`��� �� .3'Qsf
� �� �o �-3.4 ,�. ��� � j�E
� _ R � b
. — �s �{ a � t� �� ,�� �
� � �•' ��
� �� ., � �.-a :� 'h. :,,,�
� '
. � ��.�t.! �'"'Q''�
� �td
� }+ .r.: - , '�� , e.
A S. _ .�''r� 1"'
. � I� �, �: + �
� � � �d � �" �
�� � : x� .:
. � -� �; � ��,
_ �.� � • =n
.� � "�,���
+� `,' }> •►
� � � �
Z � � �
a � e �: `�'��.' �� � Y
�: � r�p�. s 4' _ �
� � $ �� � ��' � �� �
s�j'.
m
� �� �
�
m
�
�
1]8G.0005 BCE/Quadrant–Coppenxood Residential Plat Sound�yew Consultancs LLC
�t edand,Pish and\l'ildlife Fiabitat:lssessment Report Recised Julv 14,2014
� Appendix B3 — City of Renton Critical Areas Map
City of Renton Criticai Areas
enz seoz >>7 _ � 1�z ��' s _
�
y2o Y � „�� � >>a �n »s -
SE 1�a 5t = "
204 ;9� isJ13 4920i 127 � 125 122
4T11 3801 N1� 4902 5p16 124 123
210 St'?n��C�r<• 131 130 129 1?6 _
201 Z02 208 't9� 1)4
d909 4915 5011 St121 202 •
zo� 21a s��o zoa Zos
2 OR
21� 220 210 204
219 �26 �00 �916 5000 5006 214 220
2f6 215
� SE 2ndP�
_._.._._�.,._.– ---•– �+ SE lnafi r-_.��A
� �._.-..._._-_._._ar'
13603 t3�8 � � Subject S�Si '��'i 14325 �
0 4921 �� 1�41 �
13613 17921� � Property D! 13611 L
.�� 11H2O 13677 -�i
13621 � � SOQi �i
� 13905 13913 �
� ( 1362� 136T1
13627 I 312 5013
� 19T02 � ��S � 13636
1 JT03 � 13 706� � 13633
13709 j � 13644
19710 13645
13T13 � 13652
1371d
13721 ]SS �O7 � 13660 1�661
13T20 �
._._,_,.---•–�–•-------• –•–....�
13801 138Q2 _ _. –.–._—•--.. .---�–•�.–
1]80'7 - 14030 142]1 14313 1432�
� 1380E ��S�S
13E13� 13814 1d020 14113 13833
w 1d831
i1t19 rw,
1J906 m
14017 1JE35 �
13825 Sf i���St <
1�837 .t
13401 13905 13915 13639, � 14d0II
SE 139tn P�
1Q 6 1d310 11�9
' Notrs 1.�11d
Na+e City and Ca,rMy Bandary � aiar..�.r�r
� � ��
i:: �.� p �
� �etrassec str.am:{clas�e�
SIoPa CitY d Ranion — i
�io�a�as ._ �
� �as a=ra�s.r..� _ s
58 0 128 258 F..� � "as a�s tP'°ro'a� �
_tsBt_vNeD_f�ler�mr_Au�ierY_Sp1�e � '90%�mQ1 . Wal�t�ds
Frnirfis'ruif 1'Iwdrrutix�a
�uiwl��dRb� rrys-+w s a iar qrrasw saac ciN�t ta.aa w�r.r.rnzsanp so�na
�. CI�}'Uf u tor iwnnn arM.nya trAn rat aMv m r.s maa m+y or ma�rwc e.
ma�
- on -� �.�,�.d�.�,.�.
Financr&ITDi+�isu�n 4/72014 TMgu�p�g�Tp����y��
118G.0005 BCE/Quadrant–Copperu•ood Residential Plat Sound�ieu�Consultants L[.0
\4'edand,Fish and��'ildlife Habitat Assessment Report Rc�iced Julc 14,2014
Appendix B4 — NRCS Soil Survey Map
; �+�P--w�o«.k„�.W�.,o� i
.
� �
- - --�,, s� ��.: — -=-� _.� �..� � �s.�
�t=8■ . �• f : y��: � � P iQN
� �-�� . at�*���� � ��� �
�. _ _s.: ` !F s t'J� 4.� ` o� [9 �_ �ul
.� t?� .� � : I
R i �' �t , �� � �.� ��� e
� � �':�� � a �' R
' �il:� � �� �'�' � d, i '.� �
�i{ d� . � �� .� �; �% `�)� `� .i
� � 1 �� �' tl }`��� ;����• �� ��' _
�s. }� 41 � �
� �-.
3� i,��S� as + ` ;: �
Y � �,�
- .M� �.r 1�.1 I�. '+i �>.. j
� i �� '� �_ 'r'.�. �fr. t• 3 � � .�iF� � 4 .
� . ' � �� �;. ' �- ,�' � tl
� �'# .�.."e i ��, �� ��� �
` ' � T:2* �y� r�t I r�: I I �� �
� : ....;,
� - t � Ir ��-.
� �� �� '�, �t 9
. - y _' �
<.,� ... • .;�� =' � . ? � �� ti
. .,,.o � ,_ . , <.. _ . , . ... .. . .�,
,.,... > . :�...
� _ _ _ - .� - i.
.� _ . _ _ _ � �,��
�` � �,�
w- r !-`��5 � .
, . � rl���� . ��,�"� f '�\ -
� :��!*�v..' ... '� 4. -$ 4 ir']1 � Oy
j�' Y� . �. .':' � ::4_�� � _�f
� C �y�Yi'�4 ��t :.�� ;eY
�i ��!lr� �
�,-�- :�.�' r
.rasn �- _ .•� � , , , � vaa�w
n �"".L l.:��. l�li'_ '_+HJ i.'4Y� .,.._ ._.!i �.��.. ..it�_ �..:.0
_ {
s �en5aci�,Moem�eem�amope(u•xas-��,ee `
r
. � N 0 15 90 l� Ib �
� 0 m 1R1 Hn �
l�P�YI�l�O�071Bmv11li4s11Y[SSI EO)e�UlMme101YY�1
Kln�County Ana,Washingmn RMfA633)
IbP UNt 8�a�boi Y�Ih�lt Nam� Acrrs in AOi PKc�M a!AOI
AgC Aldsrtiood grav�eMY sandy loart� 13_6 100.096
6 b 1 S parrent slapes
Ta�ais i�or Ana of In�st 13.6 t 00.OX
118G.UlX�� BCIi/Quadrant—Cop�n��ood Residendal Plat Suundcie��Consultants I.LC
\\edand,I ish and\\ildlife Habitat:ls�zssmrnt Report Re�ised�ult'14,21114
' y �
� � WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ,�.a
� �PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT
_ �, ►-�
;;' n �
n,rn SOURCE DATASET: PHSPIusPublic Query ID: P140401144953 �
�� REPORT DATE 04/01/2014 2.50 PM �
w
a a
� �
o- c� Canman Name Sire Name Prionty Araa p��� Federal Stahw Sensitive Dau Sowce Entiry � !
Scren66c Name Source Dauael Ocartence TYPa State SwWs Resolution Geornetry 7ype �T1
�`� Sarce Record More In(anulion(URL) pry� ��
��strKl I
r� Noles Sotrce Dale �d R°0°^�g
� O
8, Biodrversrty Meas And �DAR RIVER VALLEY OPEN Tertesinal H�dat 1l4 mile Ouarter WA N
� PHSREGION ( WA Depl.of Fish and WJdlife �
^ � N!A N.'A AS MAPPED Pdygons
902688
� °' nn,.�::,if:.:. ��.v�,,,�����„�!, ,i�,,�,i nnn uHr.lr�.1Fr� �
� ,°,. y,�,:,,��. .y+ �` , i`r .T'�wt}' �. � � j �. -iY:r+�:+;�"� flt���:.'al Y�1!!M�t 1q:!a�ri�; • -�� . .,,, �
�a, �- 3a'S"'�.,�i �, ���� ., �i �
. .
� w _
r
:� . .
., � . r , .
,.u� �.,.. ,� � •• � ��-� '�� �' �
.
�, .�'� , a ,�. .• f'�, ,t .a1 j�,��y' ,f , �e �� rs..
;
m .. _ ;� f �
;y '"�x..�. "� � `. . + �,,�,. ,`'..
.
.1 '4i�, ., _ �y ..� � � _ 't ti �` ��� A�� �
. .� ' ..
. ��..�'i�." � ..: � . � �e�. �- . Ir•
• .
_`• _J � ; : �'"' •a 9 • �,, `t.�� ^
-
s � t.
.� � �.�' �.._� .t� *�+'"t�'. �►;.�w'��r�•��y .,�...' �, l q�.' �� ' ��� .r".., "';"� �'� ,, ' h�.
.�t� ' � �'- �:°��� .._,.} .r,.��+f+. . .. . �1y i � ', 1�y .r �'.....p.p,'��y �
.1�� �' ��y�j. � nm� �., w.�� 7�.� 7'�M' � r-t � "�+ � _,�y�1
���, �' S �
� j �j � ..��'t�'R� Rrj i 'i � ,'�,�w r" ? � `H�'1�' r 1, ,3�t! � "�'s�
.
.
, . � . .�y, _. r�. .�, �,r^ , �� w .�,1
.
, '�r. � t-. .'t — �, _ R . `v y ° . u
� �+.c��Y � .' ""� ..�, a . .� J a 'T
•
,,„
M�' � If� F'... �. J.� ¢ .. 1 � j +'i '.Y ^+\�
�« Y �7'e .n'.�I't• . i�� «�._. ' .� .�� 1 . . 3. �' � `�
�:� - �n �y r ,��'R�- +�' 1!1 �� � T ,1� . ,HMc`4 •'] � i I� � '�.. ?�
�•, k *'""�.� �•vR... r ' }�:. .;� ,�'�r�v17 � IVI „1 l� �
M1 .',y��_'j'iy� - !'. �/��"� .'��- - _ � y, � J.M ��..����, ��!�. _ I ...w.J��� ��
.. � i �,.r ..
.
.
�' ..�.�' ;. ' " " , . ..'
,... ��� + ;���.,� , , w• ,is�
...::,�.�r._�. ����",+,� r 1-1� '"` .! b� s�# ' �•� �
,b,$�. „r *i J; ,.s ..t. , � y r?
,�y,,� +f'_�.� ,i:.
.+�'
Er'r, ♦ 1'
.t �
1
i . � �
_ tli� I
. ,
. �f�'r'
.
. �,
. ,. -�, . � , � .
. '� - �y�
�.z f. "�''f�►x• '�'1�.��„�'.'ri"�.+� ,<'"'-r M�- }` �. ,a '�}{�'� ' � � �
. ,".i"'�.�, '' ;� +": ���^�
ry *' �'+ '��� a ' ' .•�. ' � ' �: �+
�;a.`Z.-.,c"q.+�-- ,�,..4 K , . ;r'�.� � �,�' ,r
.
�y- •� x^ r + '� M,� �
' 9 �,A/ `-'� , '�a � 'IY,', ,4 � yv i':�4 �V
.
. •:
�
� I �� �(,s- , _�l ti� � ,v
� w� .� � r �b �i`�", -, , A
,
• i. • ' .
� �
^ � .. . . �._ _.r ._ _ p'�
..... . s�aa.� ' �
. .
n.
.b n . �-_y�(•�� ��.:,�„ �.� '�.I • ��'w �* .j ..A. �•
' ,,.
f` r d 1,�
,.-. 1
` •4C� � ����w'• l ''�I 1y�I `1'' v�
� C' �, '�~ L'�MIMC�.. � � I � •�+ �.l...L � 9 �� •
4- 7 ���� �! t�+r�/vv���k,' �'� � ;%. '���A �,S �} �{� � ;�, �
.
� �- , ♦ b - a � �� ,r�' �I .'. i, �"f"' �
. y^ ��'�:.� '`. .�,�w,. ' . f .. �4 f. ! ^" q _�..
.1+ _ ..'k qs I .� . . ,�� � ���.JJ' 1..'� •?.w *f �
N .. �Y��Y �',�, .. . t ,ryfF. � � r�y, ���
�i- � Y
� n
A endix B6 — WDFW SalmonSca e Ma
. - � .t ��_ , - �
: - Z �� _
= �� n - s �
* � --
� NE.tst G� a o
i 7C = � �
f �a • � ; ,
y � Wt Is1� ,_ _#; ttF 1 t �.i
}�� �� � �
I '� �
! 1 se�r,�rss�_.' _= � _ � �
_ ,� , '�—�--_ � �
,` � ;--_ _
.� �5 �
� .�.� f
t.1�' --- "`__.. ._ "�... ...'_ ... ... �. '..� -� h CI �
_ �� F __. _._.
4
�~` � �" '� Subject �
. ,� f � _
'� � ,,, � Property
� " � �
` �
� ti,
i
J7
.` "
i . , :�� 5� �' ' ��•
•���� 3E rnpn s�
--' ;� w
gt_ � -- � ,j 4,; � �[
�7
Yy, �tt t1 � _
� � -_
--:_-8E 112nJSt ---" p �`�
-�-- --�?
R
�
W -
wj -._,.. �i
4 _
` 8 -
. t r+f` ` ,
S � ` -
r�. D
- - --'pt �'i�R1 57-- _. ._ �t----'.4 I
+. - >_ !
�
Apri!3,2014 1:9,028
o a.o73 a�s o.a m
— All SaimonScape Species
0 R 1 42 U.4 km
118G.00C15 BCE/Quadrant—Coppetwood Residenrial Plat Sound�iew Consultants LLC
\�'ctland,Fish and\�'ildlife Habit�t:lssessment Report Re��ised�ulc 14,?Ol4
` � `� �' ' ' ` � �
� c A - ��1...1�.1_� � , { �_,�i�� ..� ._i � �
� � � �
;� � �
� � � � .... �p
� � a �a � �p CD
a m � � '�._c' .- � � �
°�,� �tr--G � ��
_ � ('� ��V.4.. � .� � � �.• � a+
a � ' � .�� \
� � � 4�
�� � 6�;t,3STtf.3i�,''�� � �
SITE
�� ° � �� -�� ; Leqend (Fiqures 2 and 3) � n
� � � — � � Watercourse � �
� �; #5 Survey notes ��1 �,
� � :5�� r
+�a:Ps. r �s
� � � � , Fish observed ••••• •� o p
� _
? _ _..__ _ No fish observed • • • •• • � �
� �
y Survey Notes � o
�' x
�.� �s� � m �
'� � # Q #�I -Obstruction(see Figure 4) �
� � � #2-Boulder pile �,
��F��` r � # � #3-End of canyon reach �;
./ � #4 —Amphibians first noted �
LAST FISH OBSERVED f 5�y18Tu_�r #5—Photo(Figure 5) �'
��,�ti. f r�' #6—Photo(Figure 6) �
.-�,' .� c'�
'��'ti� g�� � �
� �
�; ��
G p
C.. . �•� .. SC�+S��'�FI�CI'«"'
� �
�
_ �
�
G G
� �
� �
1. -�
N �
J-, C�
Appendix C — Plant Species List
This appendit includes a table urith recommended plant species (C1) for the optional buffer
enhancement plan. (Altemarive native plants ma}' also be used �vith biologist's approval).
Table C1. Enhancement Plan Plant List.'
Name Form&Habit Comments
�--
Trees
�-------
Cone bearing evergreen is adapted to a w•ide varien�of soils in
Douglas Fu Evergreen tree;extremel}� terms of texture,but reaches its best de�•elopment on cla}'loams,
(PseUdotsuga silh-cla}�loams,and silt loams which are deep,moist,and�i-el1
menzresii) dr}�sites. drained. The Douglas-fir is an important Eood for mant•naa��c
birds and mammals.
Large deciduous tree often mula-stemmed and covered w7th
Big-Leaf Maple Deciduous tree;dn�to mosses and other plants.Fmquend}�found w-ith Douglas fir and
(Acer macrophyllum) moist sites. on sites disturbed b}>fire or logging.�t�inged seeds descent like
helicopters,which increases dispersal.
Western Red Cedar Erergreen tree;moist to Cone bearing evergreen deer browse it all�•ear along the coast
(Thuja pGcata) ��et soils. occurring on various substrates,commonl}-on moist sites
(swamps,�vet ravines,poorly drained depressions).
Sitka Spruce E�-ergreen tree;in damp ��er}��-�gorous,broadly conical conifer. Is good on an exposed �
(Picea sitchensis) locations. or poor site.
Shrubs/Emergents
Vine Maple Deciduous shrub;does not Large specimens u-idel}'available;spreads b}-root and seed
(Acer circinatum) ahra�•s spread a�gressivel}�
Red Currant Deciduous shrub;does not One of our finest ornamental nadces;produces clusters of�vhite
(Ribes sanquineum) spread to red tlo���ers
Nootka Rose Deciduous shrub;spmads Thickets of spring stems create a formidable banier;produces
(Rosa nutkana) by underground runners to attracdve,pink tlou•ers}ollow•ed b��large,red hips;tolerates salt
form thickets spray-
'Red Elderberry Deciduous shrub;does not Produces red,non-edible berries;some success reported from
(Sambucus racemosa) spread �voody cutrings
Salmonberry Deciduous shrub;spreads Spreads quickl}-once established;berries provide tood for a
(Rubus spectabilis) by underground runners to �ariet}•of songbirds
form thickets
Buffer Seed Mix
Blue Wildrye (Elymus glaucus) — _ I
�1
Idaho Fescue(Festuca idahoensis) �
�
�
Red Fescue (Festuca rubra) f
California Brome(Bromus carinatus)
Large Leaf Lupine(Lupinus polyphyllus)
r-
Meadow Barley(Hordeum brachyanterum) (
--- - - - ---__ --__---__ _ ____-- -- ___ __ ___ _ ._ __�
�[inal planr sck�non r<�be��rritied h�'th�pru�ret scienu,r. Aati�e pl,i�t sub�riruriim�m��,t�be acee�irable��irh the pn�i�ct�cicntisrs ap��r n��al.
118G.U005 BCf:/Quadrant—Coppen�ood Residential Plat Sound�-ie�r Consultants LI,C
\\'rtland,Fish and�ildlife Habitat:\ssessmrnt Report Rerised�ul��14,21114
Appendix D — Site Maps and Plan Sheets
This �ppendi� includes the project site plan maps sho��-in� the esisting features of the site, the
proposed features of the site, and the proposed planting plan.
1186.0005 BCE/Quadrant—C��pperu•ood Reside�tial Plac Soundcie�c Consultants LLC
\\'ctland,Fish and\\'ildliEc Habitat.\ssessment Report Rc�iscd I�I�14,�(�1-1
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT- SITE INVENTORY
� - ; T-llti`"
_ E END
-------� ; `. \-� � — J �/
i
-----�°�---------�=----------�-�-- ' � � � ; i
-------- ' -----------
� --=--• �----�_ 1 L_ � . ., � �!.:;: WATER � �
i � �, � --- ------- --- -f----��--- ----------' — � — — —
, � , � `.� � ��
,-; -x-- . � sE z+�v� � '--- ----------------��- i � §
-, --s--- -------'---
� �. ;. / x�---�x�"'.��.�\` , ; . ---------->---�-�-----------__-_ \ � ���TM sT ------- ------------ -�-_�_� 4 �O N N '..
� ` _ ____�___'___'j
�� ' � � � �' � I �-----�__ / r- — .— c � _` ; L'y"----- �"--------- � ,
� _ � — ( ,i / � _ ��
1�� � � ;, � : � � - .�. � � � -� J =__��- -,_,---------------------------------� � '� � ; � Z��� � ',
—� — — — � - i — — \ �,� 1 � � -�--------- --- i--- 3 i i
� i/ J \ ~j I( \ � --� � l � � � � �-- ., `r-��.` \ n �� �
� � � � � � i J � � �- •� � .----�--'------ ' •�� � .
/ �' i � � I EXISTIN�FSHAIy� E ' � — � � �"� \ N�N N �
1� r � i ,, I[�;� I � DITCH(TYPICAL) / ; V{ � � � / 1"�i � � ^ — / � ; ` � f � °�Y��
�S�
/
� ' �� � � � �
, � j �� i � \� � �( ��I�� � `� �� � I i � � ��� j i ' � �N '�'"�s
� , � ,i.., �;`: ; � �� ;, , � i i� I ► � ; � d,�
/ �— � � ' I..l � , ' �. � / I �i! I I 1 I �� �� I �� ' � J �_
/ \` i i " � '+ �� - � /'CONSTRUCTED SWALE ��I I I I ; I - i i Q
� � I I � L� 1 / (CLASS 5) , � _ �� � � �� � � �'� , i � i
� � ,,/
� � ' , � '� � \ ` � I �' I� / I� I 1E E�.lt.i{' � � \� I I � � V'`, SJ�'
� ;•. :a�:..: � i ' �,'.� � v EXIS ING STRUC�URES :.� I i I I / ' I�,.�= ; i I � �, � `� � n8 �coN
, � ; �' .I � � (TYPI�AL) � � .` , � � ��� � �, I \ \ � �
' r . ; i 4 � J i I i ' P,� p�5 � �� ���]"��r Iq LI � � � i ✓ � \
i � !� �I � i �i .;./p13 �I;�_/ �M` t� ` � t � i — — — — — _
/ � i � ��.:� _, . i ( �� 12 �� �f � \ , � � i ;
' `� � 1 - N �t
1� i � � � � �_ r__ (�P� PtOP� s•inswr� �� ,� \ � \ � i i � ri = � � �
1 j I �'�:I � 1 � / IE 5��7L� l�1 �� � \� `. � � � ,, -a.l �� x oo .
� � I�': �' �� ir,os aar � � �„� � � \ �, � � � = -r v
� ; ( � � � (� �c..�e,sr � � � 1 ` \ i �
-� ; � i f. — 4 � _ �
' � I� C �
� I
L � ------------�- _ , .•,.... �\ � I i j----� \\
— , , � , � �
J ' � � �., ,. .�. M
C I / -_ I , 'I � � � ±
// \ ;/ ,� I �- _ � � / � —�,-y,---��� � � �Y� � ` ` � \ I � � J ^ N N �
�1 4 � ` �� - I \ � �� I �./
�. � � � �__
� �I � \ � J
` / , , �- i J � � � ', � �� \ ;_-�= - - - - - � �+ � �
, y_ I �
I� � \ � = ', ''I �. � � -. � ��� �i �I; � � ��� ~;� �_-' �� lva �� � � 1 � ; ' � o - � ;
� �
�� � �I � �� -- - � �- �� � ( ���1 — ! � �� ` -- - � �� � � _
� � �
� � � ; �� \ \ /� � ; �
/ - � / - - /' �
I � / // .. . • � ^ �.'�,.j I � � � ___ � \ \ / I I � I ` �/ � ,��`-l.V� \ \ � I j' � � ' J M 3
� /� / � �4f,.:1 ) / � ; ; /, -� ;) � � I, � \ p h �` � 1 ( C N ; � " � � �
� �iii�'� � I;°� � -~ / - - / � `//� 11 �I � �) - � \�.� , 1 �}\\�� � �� � 1 ��� -- - - - - �' � 3 � �'
`- � � l°:a �� � � ,,� �( � �.'`'�� � — 1 �p-� � � � I 1 � � 7 � � =
� �� � ��,� ,� 1 � J I �I , � � � � � � �5�c��� ��� � t � � � � _ . ,: _
� ' � / � � � �� � 1 �� �� 1 � � � � � � � � "
\ t �\ ��J/� _" �j;�� � � ;� � ,� � � ;�\ l� � �� � "�� � �l � ; o � � � -
� _��� � � � [�<1 � -�— . �s '� �.� - �L 1 0 --� � / � �� ����' � � = � ::� �
` — ��` � ��� I � �I� ; —\ ; _ I J l ( \�, "'�� �� �� �
� x �/ , � � , �
���.
� � ^ ? / � � �I � � \ � �!� � � // � � , .. 'a3 _ ��' ; �� - - - - - -
� � �� I E_'1 �l � \ /� � � I � � �_ � � w�a � ,; \ ) �,; �
I , � i
� � ��i' I! : I % c / ' I�I � _ ~ '------ \Y'M�IE WOO�TRIBUTi�4RY 0303 ( /�I �� ��� �_ ��'; �! 2
l'° j �� l � , ,� � ,� ;' �- — _ s�3) � � ►�/ � �W� �� !1� ; � �
, _ � / . � �J � � � ` �
, �
` f t-;". / / 1.� \ / / � i� ` ✓ I \ \� \� \ CLA�S 3 STREA��\� �\\ � i � �`/�\ Q �+ ^ v�
� f � � � NOR�CI-IOFW18)� ` ' �- - - - - - - �
I / � I
� -�� f � �
�'.<}, ' � � � i �� �� ` �\�� i � 2 � �
4� 1 \ `� f � �R � � \ � � � ;` � , � . H H
1 \\_,..__�.� /� ��� \ / � (/ � ��� � _� / � � _ � `/��� '`\ \��,1 Ei \ i � � � 2 '-'s
.J \
� � � � f �_1 -� �AODITIONALLVATURAL FISI-r WQ7 �'' �i � �/i 2 � Z '
_ «_�%-I —��� � ��� __'`------- i P�3S/�GE BARIERS � � , 'I� � I� W ;�; ¢ c-L
� .- r � � .. i
` , • ''•. � — / / � FIRST yATURAL�FI�i PASSA�E B�j(RR� � i � 'j���j: � � ` R"' v' '3 �z
� � \ \ 1 � _ � ' = — � \ / � , � , ��� ; , � � z ��
J i ; / \ � / �NY1 ,�q ��i � � � G C
❑ ^ — ? ��� � ---� _ ,J � � � � � � -� � ;! �� ; ; — — — — — - U �" �;
� � � � V i /" � / � I''' ' z
�� ��� �� )� �� � — _ � � � � ��� �� ��ii , /I�l�l� � � � ;
( 1 � / � � ,S'TR �i j��/ ���f� �J, �'"
� (��c �/�// �/ i i .
\� � - � � ,� - ,` 7 l l � � aF�a�,j�'/., � � !l� .
r � �— — — / � _-,\ � t � � � / ? l� �r�i�<i! -/�// �� � ; _
� � { '/ � 1 �� � \ � \ \ / � �' � ��j; ' /�j�� �j � � � �.��rr: 7/14/2014
1 � \ � � � � � � ( / � � i � �//�/ //�//// '
✓ L I /"`i \ \ 1 �LAS3��S'f �, '�� �/ � %� �: �oa: 1186.0005
0 40 80 �� i so — � . �,. � � i (����F�i���/% %�,� ;�i����i� `. . �. �� sY: �x/��i
` ' _ J �.. �l .
� � � ���'//j�� �� ��/�
� � � _ — ` l � / / / / � � � �.,. '' _----�-, sc.��: t" = 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE = — — — — " � \ � - � � � �! � .'1�=--���"°�. :j
_ _ �.i ` ,� 1
1'�80' � r� � �" � �.� SHF.F.T OF 4
� ''•..:.._.�:..:
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT - STREAM BUFFER AVERAGING
�_ � � _
_ — I — � � � LEGEND g�
---L � N =
-+—
h' �, --� � WATER Z � ��
/ ____ f_ ;
_ ---- ----- g --- i e�-----t--- -- ��� s���sn�sr � <�N� ��
— _ - ---- ----- }- ---------------�---- _ STREAM BUFFER AREA INCREASED Z��� ��
� �
�3iAin �ci
� � STREAM BUFFER AREA REDUCED �1-'�^ �S
1 _—_-_� _ �W�N FT�
1 I 27 �28 � w , Y�`
� � �� � � �
I — ' � �N ' '"'s
I W3 E3 J� ���i
I �„ ,;;
�_ ,,, 'I I � _
,2 �I 26 � ' ' �,,,,;,,,,,,5 � .. = o
! � W4 E4 /,,,,, / • ( � �
� % �b8 �co�sJy
3 25 30 � � 42 47 '"5 5 — -
, i \ _ _ � � ,
' - I .rj - �r, �n .
! t = -� _
W �
I x ao
_ . s i � _ 7 � .,
4 � 24 , 31 , , w � w _ N � -�
' I � N _
��� ��� 41 ,
� � J �
5 ' � 23 � ,� 8 — — o _ � � ;
32 _
, ❑ _ I qp s ( � _ -
� \ s 22 , 33 I i � wio 10 w = _ ^ `
I �� , � � ;.
� �� STREAM BUFFER AREA INCREASED I 5 7 .3 i �
I < � 39 w� 12 �s,n2 sF) � _ = � ;
� - � � �
w
w�z � - -
7 � � � = z
I �I� I I I � I 1 I � I �vI O ` '�^i J :
I ( mD � -
8 ! 20 37 , � �s � — — -
� �
i
� �.�� W14 �q � � �
9 �
I � \ W15 15 Q ^ ,�Z,
' � � � PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 � O � Z ��
, (TYP;SEE NOTE BELOW) � W16 16 _ _ n C � ��
t , � � � .
� -� � � r � _ �, ;; ��
, � Q z ��;
� � \ ' - -- --- --i 4 \ W17 t7 �! 2 'r' zo
\f l I W N ¢ �''r']
\ // �.y �� � r% a� `)z
» - I � 0 » I � �, � +C .,�'"�n Q
t I ■I � '� z . �,'
i
X
L
� r. .r.
_ � / � i; W1 18 � X � C
I �- ; �� I EXISTING PROPERTY t � - - U 2 a
��
� � � � � I,/� LINE(TYP.) � � ! � � �
f ' I / �O S r.�
I I ' e� TR .
r � xi I � � �s n �8 i � �'f ��F,��M �
PROPOSED PROPERTY 1?
( � � ( :� '
I LINE(TYP.) � �' � ; D,��: 7/14/2014
�
_ � � � �� (1,30 F) UFFER AREA REDUCED �os_ 1186.0005
0 40 80 160 �_ 8��: JR
— — — sc�t.E 1"=80'
I GRAPHIC SCALE / � �
i•-eo� \ sHrer ��F a
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT - PROPOSED SITE PLAN
— I — � I LEGEND � ��
� � �
---L- ---�— � WATER �
M � W � �
M ; � �
/ - —
- ___ � - - � - ol�---,-- - ��'0� ���TM� _ � NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA o$N^ ��
tncvw _�
I
Za�oao �y
/ � �3�n�n �c5
� BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA � N N �
�, — c °��� �S�
1 ! 27 2$ � ' TEMPORARILY DISTURBED BUFFER Y vv
' � 45 � AREA (REPLANTED) N �•,,,,�.
_ I J�F' sb��i
; •- ; , � PEDESTRIAN WALKING TRAIL Q =
-{ W
2 % � I 1 V
� 26
29 , � � _
� � � , � , c� ~
� ;,,,,,. I b Ny�.,
i
8 ,co
3 25 30 42 47
I — � = �
:
� � �
_ , �., - �, �
( _ x � ,
4 � _ 7 � ^
� V � �
r., _. � � �
� ' 24 31 — �, N
' � WALKING TRAIL(PERVIOUS) 1 NATIVE GROVYTH PROTECTION AREA _ _ ' � ^ ,� � `
Lv ' �
5 � 23 32 , � - v � �
� �' ' ❑ i � _ �
— 40 - —
, _ - - I � �
I $ — , M �
s
M
I - .
�
� aa �
w
. � � I, _ �� � � `� � ".! � �
� i 39 _ . _ ' � � .: °
I � I FINAL BUFFER EDGE AND LIMIT OF i'� � � � �
7 ; ! � � I � NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA � � _ - .�
r Q ^ r :.,
' I , I I � 1 1 1 � I N� 'x '
-,� m o� '� - ; ::. _
- � � ' D _
� � I m� _ —
' 8 � 20 � I a�7 � � ���� � � .
, rl OUTLET INSTALLS IN BUFFER. ' z
� OUTFALL TO STREAM BUFFER DO NOT INSTALL OUTLET c �?
� ' � �n
i f � WITHIN STREAM. o ,�
9 �1,
'� I �� � ' Q W � � -
0 � , 36 PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT �,�ti �� v Z
i , (TYP;SEE NOTE BELOW) � t,� `� 16 — — � �t � F�
� � , �. —_. 1�� � � � z `n�
� _" , � \ ' - - -- - - - i 11 17 �'' Nvxi �—
i �� .,y �l 11 I I � W :a � -c;
' \ � � � � MODIFIED STREAM BUFFER �I � I '� '� '3 j z
� � ��H I �H � I � ,� � i '� � Z ��
�;' j� � % 18 � C C
� � � _ ��� � EXISTING PROPERTY '� �f � — — U 2 a
;r— � � � I I LINE(TYP.) � ,,' � `-�0., �
I � �I' I x
� � � I � I �J i �6 � n � I � I r MINOR GRADING WITHIN �
I I � I LINEP�P j PROPERTY I 'I� BUFFER TO BE RESTORED /14/2014
(APPROXIMATELY 3,008 SF) °���'- �
II ( i,;,� / � _ �os: 118G.000�
0 40 80 160 I I B}"� �R
" — — -- SCALF: 1�� =SO�
IGRAPHIC SCALE / �
1'�EO' \ / I SHEET� OF 4
COPPER�IOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT — DETAILS AND PLANTING PLAN PICAL
SAMPLE ENHANCEMENT PLANTING LAYOUT SCALE: 1^=30' LEGEND � ��
�'� � _ WATER �
�'�� ; o � �" � � ��
f� ��� ��� _ � ��
� „ Q ONa�O �
� � NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA Z��� ��
,,//�,�%,i;;, 'i�/�/ i . i i
� �< Z
�% � � 1� I ^3N�n �Z�
_._. ��� � ' � N N Wg�
�N N
- i �. ��� � �Y.�....�.. 23�i
� �
/
�/ �� �, , / � ��� 1 ay���v�
i ,(
��"- 4/ � �.� J �Z
� � � ,, . ///�. /�� � �j �:j�%�i'// �
Q �
���� //_ ,.,� "" �� '' TREE PLANTING DETAIL � i
� � �/ �' � d > NOT TO SCALE dd s°y
� . r� 8 �coN
� o
`�a (2)2X2 D.F.STAKES;TIE AT APPROX.Y3 TO Yz HEIGHT OF
, � �� o ; � � � � TREE WITH FLEXIBLE RUBBER TIE IN FIGURE EIGHT
�! ' � . � I PATTERN.STAKES AND TREE PLUMB;STAKE PLANTS AS � _
�► - � � NOTED ON LEGEND �''�� � = �� � j
� �`���� . =, �
�:: r ��., = x � ,
REMOVE ALL TIES.WRAP 8 CONTAINERS.FREE �
j� �, '� � � PERIMETER ROOTS FROM NURSERY BALL � ,� � �
�1f� ,n "
i �. Ni
I '�� j` � 3'DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER � �� ``�j � c"'v c"'•i '
�
,� � ;;'�; Ig � ,`� T ..
�%%% EXCAVATE TREE PIT TO MIN.OF 4 TIMES DIA.OF yA ,� _ ;y ,� �,
,#��, ` ROOTBALL AT BALL CENTER,TAPERING PIT �1 _ � ,� �
�„,,;, � GRADE TO FINISH GRADE _
/i�:%'%;i�/�% / • O .
�i� /!, PIT SPOILS,NURSERY BALL WASTE BACKFILL I �
/�;;;ii;�,/,%�//i� / - ,
I SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OR : ' =
COMPACTED SOI� �,,\ � z � M '"
PLANT LIST e � w � ^ � �
_ �
NOTE:WORK PERIMETER ROOTS FREE OF NURSERY BALL&SPREAD OVE �� .= 3 � ''
(FINAL LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES TO BE FIELD LOCATED BY RESPONSIBLE WETLAND SCIENTIST) EXCAVATED PIT.BALL 8 PIT TO BE COURSELY SCARIFIED � 7 � � _
� _ � w �
� � � ^
TREES (AS NEEDED) � - = �
SPACING '
SYMBOL SCJENTlFIC NAME COMMON NAME (FT O.C.) SI2E(MIN) ', r O c r ''" '
, V x _
� ^ N .i _
PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR �$ 2 GAL
� ACERMACROPHYIIUM BIGLEAFMAPLE 15 2GAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL —
� THUJA PLICATA WESTERN RED CEDAR �5 2 GAL NOT TO SCALE
z
� PICEA S►TCHENSIS SITKA SPRUCE 15 2 GAL LOCATOR LATH(IF SPECIFIED) � N
�
SHRUBS (AS NEEDED) NOTES: � �
SPACING 1. PLANT SHRUBS OF THE SAME SPECIES IN
SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME (FT O.C.) SIZE(MIN) GROUPS OF 3 to 6 AS APPROPRIATE. O �' O �
w 2. EXCAVATE PIT TO FULL DEPTH OF ROOT MASS � �, 4�
�i ACER ClRCINATUM VINE MAPLE 2 1�L AND CANOPY DIAMETER.SPREAD ROOTS TO � �
� � �
FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY. � Q z t�j
RIBES SANQUINEUM RED CURRANT Z 1 GAL ,ri
3. MIDWAY THROUGH PLANTING ADD AGROFORM a! z x z o
� ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE 2 1 GAL TABLET AND WATER THOROUGHLY. � �,7� `� `� O•`
� 4. BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED USING WATER +� � � V�
SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA RED ELDERBERRY 2 1 GAL ONLY. � ,�j � ;'�<
5. WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. O � 2 '�,�
� RUBUS SPECTASIUS SALMONBERRY 2 1 GAL U F, �
���� z �
3 to 4 INCH IAYER OF MULCH , • ;� �-'
BUFFER SEED MIX (AS NEEDED) ��/ � a' f'.
PERCENT BY QUANTITY /�
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME VOIUME (APPROX.) %i';. • \� c=..,
ELYMUS GLAUCUS BLUE WILDRYE 15
�.�re: 7/14/2014
FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS IDAHO FESCUE 15
FESTUCARUBRA REDFESCUE �5 I��B� IIHG.00OS
30 LBSlACRE
BROMUS CARINATUS CALIFORNIA BROME �5 sY: JR/Kl�i
LUPINUS POLYPHYLLUS LARGE LEAF LUPINE �5 SCALE: r1S NOTED
HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM MEADOW BARLEY �5
SHEGT OF 4
Appendix E Biologist Qualifications
Jeremy Downs, Princi�al Scientist and Environmental Planner
)erem}� Do�vns is the Principal Scientist and En��ironmental Planner for the project with professional
training and extensive experience in land use, site planning and design, project coordinarion, permitting
and management, marine and ��-edand ecolo��, habitat restoration, ��etland, stream, and benthic
delineations and assessments, stream assessments, unciet-��-ater and terrestrial monitc>rin� progr�ams, and
mitigation planning and design since 198�.
Jeremt- earned a Bachelor's of Science degree in Biolo�n- from the Universit5- of California, Davis. in
addition, he studied under the Environmental Risk and Reco�-en� program at the Australian Insritute of
:�farine Science. He also holds graduate-level professional certifications in various advanced wetland
:cience and management programs from both Portland State Universin� and San Francisco State
L'ni��ersitt-, and he has received professional training in Salmonid Biolo�- from the L"niversin� of
California Estension.
Jerem}' is a certified wetlands delineator under US Arm}- Corps of Engineers guidelines. He has been �
formallj� trained in the use of the ��'ashington State ��%etland Raung S}'stem, Determination of Ordinary
High `�'ater i�lark, Designing Compensator�- �firigauon and Restoration Projects, and Revie�ving
\t�etland �litigation and titonitoring Plans from the L"S �rmy Corps of Engineers and Vi-'ashington State
Department of Ecology, and in conducting Biological Assessments from the��Uashington Department of
Transportation. He is also a Pierce Counn� Qualified ��'etland Specialist and Fisheries Biologist, and he
hc�lds similar qualit7cations from other jurisdictions. I
James H. Carsner, Senior Scientist I�
lim Carsner, a certitied Professional ��'edand Scientist (#1461) �vith professional training and extensive
�sperience in planning and design, project coordination, permitting and management, aquatic and
«-etland ecolog��, habitat restoration, wedand, stream, and benthic delineations and assessments, stream
assessments, and mitigarion planning and monitoring since 1979. Jim earned a Bachelor's of Science ,
degree from the L`niversit}' of��G'ashington, College of Fisheries and undertook post-graduate studies in �i
�vetland ecolog�- at Pordand State University He has served on the Board of Directors of the I
�t'ashington State��G'eed �lssociation and instructed courses on pesdcide laws, regularions,and uses.
Jim has been formally trained in the use of the��'ashington State��'etland Rating St-stem, Determination ,
of Ordinar� High ��'ater lfark, Designing Compensaton- �liugation and Restoration Projects, and �
Reviewing «'etland i�Iitigation and �Ionitoring Plans from the US rlrmt� Corps of Engineers and '
��'ashington State Department of Ecolog�-. He is also a Pierce County Qualified ��G'etland Specialist and �
Fisheries Biologist, and he holds similar qualificarions from other jurisdictions.
Hannah Blackstock, Staff Scientist
Hannah Blackstock is a Staff Scientist �vith a background in both forest and �vetland ecologyr and
fisheries biology and experience with various Federal agencies. Hannah earned a Bachelor's of Science
��-ith a double major in Environmental Science and Resource �Ianagement as �rell as Aquatic and
I�isheries Sciences at the Universit}� of��`ashington. Hannah has an extensi�re kno�vledge of restorarion
ecolo�-, ranging in topics such as soils, plant familiarih', h�Tdrolog�-, and �yetland ecolo�-. Furthermore,
she has been certified b�- the ��G'ashington Department of Ecology� in the use of the \�'ashington State �
�\'etland Rating S��stem and Selecting ��'etland �fiugation Sites Using a �x'atershed Approach and has ,
received training from the P���'lnvasi�re Plant Council on the identification of newl}-emerging in<<asive �'
plant species. She is also a Pierce Count}'Qualitied Fisheries Biologist. �
, i
1 1�G.0005 [3CE/Quadrant—Copper�rood Residential[lat Sound��iew Consultants LLC
\\ctland,F�ish and\C`ildlife Hahitat:�ssessment Report Re��ised lulc 14,?�!ld
6.3 Buffer Averaging and �
Enhancement Plan by
Soundview Consultants dated
April 24, 2015
Y
m
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT o �
A PORTION OF THE SE Y4 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 23 N,RANGE 5 E,W.M.
CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON �
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 1 0
1 1NCH = 50 PEET(2�'Y.i6")
VICININ MAP NTS �
0
F
E7nSTING Dit�uNGE pTCn(NFKJIL) f ` : � �- •••.t�-•�.� ,,,,� d . " - rc
, � _ ._ . . - .w....r
R� . � / �' r--T� 1 � . .
_ ' �_
% � l �
\
\, . �� �{*�r
—�'' -^---s,., -`-----�,`' .--�. `, .�..�._-z��_: .� Z_:\_ '"_.1""\1__1 1_�_�__—�.i�f l�-- ��__--' O 9 � +J - . m
� - _ O..
""' -. `_ � . .
� .—.�-.T_1�.,� f� �-�.11�__�_�_ _�_���- �� -_. _— g--'R - __\_ SE t.%M Si '— - -•- --„� - _ � _.. _, "" . � . ,M+_ - .
c� ' i� -. — �• , ��.� i� -----�-- r?/� ______�i :i l�:..��. _'� � l / 1�z��__`-'____, � �.-...
.. _� 1)O � ! _
' � ' '�" _
� � .
� _ _ � ' — ` _l � i� t �.,�� '- 1 i e
.' _
� '' {
i � i�/-�-----�^ Y �i �_ . — _ ._' �" �\ �\ �i, %� ; I-'"-- ---- --�---5 - ---�c- � 1 = ...�--t �
. i � I TM" � � "_�'-�� � � } _'- � \ � .--�.�------ � ....�--.� -.-- ,..�.
i �� �' \ 'h � � 1 �.� ` i �� 1 � �� { E I �" `l , � r
� - q � _� I � _ � -y �- �i f , �
. �- � � ( ► � � , i� ' ' �' --' ' ', ( � ` _ -- _
, � .. _ -
�, � ; I - -- �` .�-� �� � -1 - it � `. ` / i i � I �_ , _.
� ii � . i i i �1 � � � •� � �,
� -�--� �ti i � �, , , � , . 1 ,1 , � �,�- , , -.-�
�� � I� � . '� � �� I 1� �� � I I � 1 � -- 3� ' r _ . ��p � o
/ i� { 1 � i I� I . -�_� � �� � � �,\ � ��t ""' Y . '"
) I� i \ 4 � �' oa+s�creo swxE �� � ac w � � 1 � � � � : i < , ._ �
� , �'+ � J \ / ` 1 1\ (�'t I I � / _ ' it t-x�f �I `i ' ' 1` {\ ll � . . � �"'i.�`..-..�. '�� PREPARED BY:
�� �_ II f \ ^ J �� � li � L'��i j � i � �� \` '�/;�� � csounc�vtecv eonsu�tarsti_
., �
, . ,
i
'.,•.:. I �� oas�wc;'srnucnne i i_ s� 1
J � � j! RYRC/�Ll f '�...: �i i �.s� �1 �I ` �\ .� �- --------- c,.�...�.,��„�,v,�..,i R�,..�.«_,�a�,a u.�co�,.n,.�.
� 1 � � ...
. - �����! � �: l � � �twov� I `t�`1t�;,.,�t `� � �� � �. z�u�E�„�.rt:.,.�om�� orr�z;isiax�s>_
` LOCATION MAP-KENT,WA NTS
� r -_ , � ' 1 >" � as�,s , 1 � , 1 \ rwtew000rn�rr�armoa �i��.an�r+i�s r,. �.ii�.e�:a
f I , �.,� , ,
�i- . � �'� �r�eoa. I �� � ��-�\ � �('�, � lC1AA4]) �;` ` I � r.,i:, s _ ........t� .t.
t� ]I �4 I �` "_�—^'- �_ I .. •�\ � i /� �__-� Z` };� � :\;��.€]�(\`\ � ��___'\___ '' � � : ' .�a � = y� . A va�u�m�oR:
�' - I�,� i I' � _ -' �� � _ `�� �� {� �''."�'� 1_6 �?�.'\�� ,f � -,` �� �: _;! � . a Y ti..,y % e� �� BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING
� . / ('y,.�-� - �'� ' � I I �. � � ` ;\��, � � t------- .,,.�� '�.r..
� I�. �
i �� �f � � � .aq _ ENGINEERS,INC
I / �� I / f I � i ��^ � �?-� � i\ ��� i � �/r���`_� f I �� ���\� \\ � 1 � E 3 � � 1M7573NDAVENUESOl1iFl
" � /�i -- � j� � L j I�1� ; � � _ � � \ � ,\i�a�\ yd ___� 1� ` �� ;_ •Y i � 3 , �
I: ' � 4 L..! `` I ` \� � \ I �- icEnr.w�srr�crow sao�
i , �j � ` �� I. � � t! i�, { ` i `'���1�� � I I � \ ,'� I \��� — \�\ \� � � •����I�y � g:s ,z_� `-` ,.,�, QUADRANTHOMES
.
i . / � �~r � '� � ". , - � :
� ,� �� . �, � , / �� .._ � +, � ��\ � i, � � �'� vrnse3sn,sra�r.surtE,00
---- �
� ���//���� . . . �'I'.� / _`� � ._'_ / �i�q° � I � . - �(. ♦ \ � `\ � � � . � w.�.nrw
I T - � i ,_ � � �, :,. . _�� � \ � , .�\ �\ ,��--------- :� = �, ,r ��.W�.�Ta,�
_- i��. /f t �. ^,. � � � . •>. � r��_� � \ t � � �t � � j T _
/ // ' I I ` 1 ,
�� .
��� y ._. ... .._ l_-- i�/ � I l i-��/� 1 ` 1 \Wl ♦�� � � l � pitp.lECT,VtEA � ' r, ... : PROJECT LOCATION:
�/ � �.��. �� � 1 � J � � !� €� � / � � J �' j2 \\ � �� � (�aawoxs��TE� I } } 3 s4 i
1 � � ,- �i —I'7 � 1� � I �� � pt' I i � i �� � � + 1 , Y ,� e, : .
� � �_ __�� ,, �� � ��� � t � � � � ' v 5001 SOUTHEAST 2ND PLACE
� �� / � i ♦ `♦ I �� � ! ! � ��\ \ � u 1J � t '"� s x
��- - � -�� ( �( � �' �h� �- �° � i� x � � ��\ �j C.�� ��<,.z � f _ ,.,...A RENTON,WA98059
---- - l---T`--�,�'1 I � �i � � �� _ � < t i � I ����\ � E \-- ' 7 c � � ��.. (KING COUNTI�
� , '�--��i' � I � $ < <� � i � �� �� ���� j� �l \yr}g;�:���\ ���1 ��1 ---- ��.... - : -
_ �_/� _" � j� ,� I �. �� i ��� � �,�- -`� 1 t � �. �._." '� i �� �
_ f i� :
� r. �! i �' � •� i _ ' _ �_+�� `t �� i � � � �wi> �u � - �ti " �aEcr COPPERWOOD
--� 1 y � , `� ,� � , _ � � � . � � �� � �. . � Fis '�ti j
' �--- � i I i � � � / i � --� , wts�. � � ;
_ ` % /� � �i � � � l � ��� � � � `� `\ ,� ' �` �oaT�w�nirtK o�oret
�`��-'�� . f r1' � i ; �---_J + �_ � ' I . �ewssw�en� a�o�t/wr�5 BUFFER AVERAGING AND
( �� �� / 1 1 / �`� \ ��\ ` 'fi .. . ____ ASSWE_ 74T155EJ6iHSiREET.5UTE100
�` � �� J ,1y i i - � i -� `' I `� ` ♦ i��s ��`'� � ( eaLv�.w�eeme ENHANCEMENTPLAN �'
�, •� ! � � � _l -•J � ci,�ss 3 srr�w�arsn+oF Fua wu - � ,. � �
` ��` i� ) ��•�i � �` / . , � i^ W17 Et7, �t j Fwsrr�lu+�t.�+e�ra� �o�ewsuave�oa:
cutss z srae�sanN aF awc w�e 1 � BAf6GW WSH/�R7l16 ENGOEERS,MIG SHEET T17LE:
_"-r—"---��1_ _� ��/ \ `_""_---z___-J � � �^'� � 1 �� '� Y` tatf 6711D AwEHUE SOIRH
� ! / � , \ `1 � ����I:�i F1'-�•,.�� ,-!�` 1�(t.ww9B032
.. . ,,- ,—� ` `, r� ,'�iry+ �F�e, EXISTING
,
•, ;_� �, , - � , -
. , , , ,
. ' � ' - �`.\`'�/� � � ��;.;�- �;'';;�'��, � ���
� ...: - " I .-'` ; -- , � , � ( ___ � _--------- LL� CONDITIONS
i.� � wur�a�nEw cronsu�uNrs
` .. _ _ 1 -- � � V� � �� , � � ii.':i���1,���`i�rr�� � c��ww�9e�
/ � 1y /\ 1 . /.:iO� .'R( !!
- �\ ��'\ ���� \ I � ��� � i � / \ � r �/,'%ii, �� ���� l Pns»s7s�
� � I / �� i/ / ti \ 1 1 1 ;i4 r����Il+, � e-rt
�t" �---��'� / �� _� ! \ � / / )\ \ 1 � ��i. %j�4 �j �/i�:J%I I .IOB NtaABER:
� � � / 1 ':i'�,'�///%� �i//� �
' , ;' � � , —'� �,. '��,,,` ` ' ,\ `.\ \ � ' ; %�`r ;,,, �%/'�,��.'%' %' r � ! 1186.0005
\1�.t 1 /� ��� � ��,��\ �� �� \1 � ���,�������ii.%ij%it�5/,,,�j������� � � �`.
� ` \ _,_y ) \ �� � � `� �l�l������/��� �.'I/%/%% �;�1'•� `��,
4 i �_--J / _. � ' �J`, ., ` \/ . .' i i ��;i,�i�i!a�/,;��y�;r , MnEx oF sH�rs
, , � >_ DESIGNED BY: JD
� i I 1 ` f �.. __ t YVL-1 DOSTINGCOWDtTiONS
� �- �-- -------.I � � 1 � , i/u�r� �J, ! -
-__ ----- i � ; �__ ,' � ' �- , -. ,�.:_ � z w�-z vROPoseoauw DRAWN BY: KM/JR
� ,-�.':��:'� �1 ' `rtis wlwTnrcPw+ CHECKED BY: JD
�..�.�:.:'�;- . � 4 WLi SPEGFICATIONS
`- DATE: 4/24/2015
REVISED:
SHEET REV.
WL-1 �
1 oF 4 �
>
m
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT < �
0
A PORTION OF THE SE 3'a OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 23 N,RANGE 5 E,W.M.
c�nrtnc sc�
CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON
so i o
i nace = so�+eer(za'�a")
�--! ! _L_ I � � � � J ' � '
�
—[�- - � 8
— ___ a
- � r _ - � i - z sc an r�_ ---.- s�i.wTM�sr g
_ �ei--J _ — — — .' i- s `4'- _ — ��--- .�ls_ _ -- _�.ri— : ..'�'��. _ '�''��:y =zlr_- — - - - -
_ — � '� . . :.l..�'i-�-r '�—`:_. . �_ .- � ...._ ��
__� _ _ J .� -- —' .:I _'_- • : LEGEND
_- - I y , ' _ _ - - - - - ,/ / '-� _
I 1 `=__ 27 28 owvEw�v a�wuv�r+o r�sron�na+�w H.3a sFl� '' i�� j � unv�w000�weurucr oxi�
� ~' ' i } " t� � � � � �
i : , w�rnE�owrH�no�cnori u�w
Pn
� -- — � — — _ .f — J ;, '% , q r�nrr�c�rvm aao�cna+s� ,
:�-1 I •`� . �t� i ;` (SEECRfT1CJ1LMEAPROTECT70NMEASIGNDE7Al�) �
2 - ;, 26 � 29 a =-. \ ` l"/ � E/;' 0 euFr�aen►w�cewe+ru�wfseeoerai�s� �
-- — ��� _ a
I // �,'
, -- .�_ �. --. !� _ ',m ,4,4 - f .{ / � ro ee�rtEor asnx+em eu�n u�ns �
�, a� t`.' 25 �� �,. '�/� cI � . — _ � w� - ����" / � �ePREV1OU'.+L�Y��iI�mBUFFERAREA PREPARED BY:
} . W : .: __ _ 'O _
— — _ +� —_. , " . _ .� i / � ` / n
��I �' �£ 0 P�S��w��T� CJOU12Qt7LE(V C�OYLSUCtQ12t1_
� �� � � � �At¢ly
I �
\ 4 � � •.L' t n� �I. .� ; '..__ $FLI7RAILFENCE / /, j I � ��� L:�.uc�•�r,n�al.\a«<al ft.>uur�� ��d L�od tu Conwl�enn
�.�� ,� � �/, znr ri�konw���o�.e exiK,zsvst��t'�v
�\ -- � ' -- � _— � . — I I� r� _ _ �:'/,� i X Gg I Ivbor,.l':\9Pt}5 Fa� bi 511.87i4
���' .Jr�.....,.1�.•e.
i ./ i �i ;
— -- ~ t F � ----- : � � -- '%j s� / / .� I MITGATON NOTES:
.... � ' � �/ / ' / //i 1. KLN'E7lM1OANOVDRBUFFERAREASAOJACEN770RAN1EDOREX4S7NOt075 PREPAREDFOR:
t� I ,� PROPOSEDWALICMGTRAIL � ��. �{�
5 f . / � y' AIiO ROADWAYS TO BE PROTECTED BY A PERMtETER SPIJT-RAIL FENCE AND
� j 32 � - -�s�ur�osrare awi�rnr�o i/��/// 1 GROTECTNE SIG W1GE(SEE CRfTiGl ARFA PROTECTKIN AREA SIGN DEfA1L5� BARGHAUSEN CONSUITING
I I ' ,. —er e�xc�wua�co�TMc /. •sra�,w aur�en u+�u+a�sEo�,ase sFl
- — ''� ` ., '` _ - � ��i+ I I 2 ,ul noN-r+�rrve wv�srve vecernnoa To ee r�oveo uro o�sluneeo ue�s ENGINEER3,INC
�I . . 41�+a�.s.nc.�
� . ,� _ — _ _ U � � � -- r+�twNreo hexamax;ro svECF�taNs artu�en ori sn�r w��. �ezis rno�ve�sourn
I STOf1MWATER FAC0.TY OUTFALL
\ 6 I - � .'. 1 ui I a� ��:la _ � —. . / �! TOOIXi.WTFALLTOCBUONFORMTO —_ 3. AL�TASCBffiS�ORTOAMYCIEARINGAND101iGRWNDDIST��Ee� KEM.W�SNN[i70NYBD32
� 'i '.�� �` /� APPIiOVED 1PA SPEGFIG7%N13.
- — - — •�1 ' ._. , I �. �uruwr�ounaisroeecooRarareowirHn��sPa�s�e�weTuvm QUADRANTHO�AES
—– — � , qp / '%%
� -vnoPos�s►r+Eiw eucrER � / i X sca�nsr awoa ro rsr�uwnoN. ura se zn+srr�T.surE iao
] I� - I � � � ! � i _ i: .— — — i %� / �t' -. s. CRRICAI AREAS PROtECTION SIGNS SHKL BE BJ3TALLED PER DEfM3 AT ALL
RF�1 ewe wnsrnr�roN seoos
� I � .. — _ _ — — —- /
I i j/ � OE8101NTED LOCA770NS PRQECT LOCAltON:
+ r _ _ � f j_ //, / �a a wi sTorw w��a swrs a resc►EwsueEs ro�wsrkim vrie ox�ses
— —. � " � — - _ — .:/ � ��` � APPROVED TESC P1N15 6 STORM WAIER POLLUTtON PREVEMION PLNIS. �
8 ;I ., ' I ' (— — — �I,� k. D 5 0 0 1 S O U T H E A S T 2 N D P L A C E
� t' :'� { .� :37 i�� � � � i � ,� '�A�t3;./ "� RENTON�WA 98059
- — t �` � � I I � � �; � ' / ;,; _ � (KING COUNT'Y)
' — -� .� � I ;. j_ � '` I � .� I � i .. -_ — ___ _ _ _ _ � . . %/ V 4`` RESTOREVAPACTEDAREAAFfER
' � ` . / �. U71Litt INSTALUTION.
9 �' -_ — - � � � � . .
_ X' ; � I ' � l - I t . \ ��� i� � vRo.�cr nnE:
� `� 16 ;, COPPERWOOD
— � � 11� . \ :� 1
� � y �� �= � - ` Et7 BUFFER AVERAGING AND
10 r s- �_=-_ .x/ uiaao�o srn�v+euF�re I
_ _ -- � ��: `�'i,� 'r�°�^^�u.m.� , �'/ �� 1 j ENHANCEMENT PLAN
- - - - - - � -_ _ _ _ ao�oe �.. ,�
. �- .— _ �q� -- -_ �R _ � ' I . . � INSTALL BLACK VfNYL CUD CMAN UNK FENCE
TIthCT� � '�•"4' f � ..Y.�: __ s� - - ' � �' ADJACENiTOSTORMWA7FJiAREA- SHEETlITLE:
` -_ "'T -=+;= �L r �._ - r �•� __ '' ,.f - / 'Vy1 7S � SEE CMl PLANS FOR DETNLS.
��`
— _— —�__.___ � I_f __— - " � - _. � —INSTALL NATIVE GROWTM PROTEGTIVE 5GN5
— ; � /�/i �/ (CAPA 51(iN3)AT WU(.f00 SPACN[i
� , - - , - - E=_. , j�;/ WFIEREFENCEISAWACENTTOBUFFER PROPOSED PLAN
� - J - _ - - — ' �a���,,.�,o�,-�-. � � �
r � � � �a � �'� �s ' : n �a j1 / � ;
1 , ; ;, ' � L\ -_ � � �
— _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. — _ i _ — _� L_ — � — _ _ \ �. —.._ JOB NUYBER:
— - ---- __— -- - - - � `�-- 1186.0005
— — -- --_ _ _ �;
'�'�Of"�""'"°"�"'°'�""T"' DESIGNED BY: JD
BUFFER TO BE itESTORm(z�At9 S�
BIFFERENMNCEAEHTAF�AN1UfiDAVESERKifTOFWAY�6,5133F) �- DRAWN BY: JR/DS
CHECKED BY: JD
DATE: 4/24/2015
REVISEO:
SHEET REV.
WL-2 �
2�4 �
T
O
COPPERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PLAT o
A PORTION OF THE SE%4 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E,W.M.
CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON
0
TYPICAL SAMPLE BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLANTING LAYOUT TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL a
u
SCALE:i�=50' NOT TO SCILLE NpT TO SCALE pj
a
�17.- .:. . . . .. _._. _ _. _----_ .. . --
-i --
�..: WSIM6wmErECELai�CM _ LOCATORUTH(FSPECff�)
pc*:uwmmccTcu) i R17%3DF.ST/J�3:11EATAPPFOXYaTOXiEJGNTOF711ffWfTHRE7�lE
��� . . . Rl1B8ER TIE IN FIGURE EIGHT PATiEAII STAI�SAlO7itff PU1M�STN(E 3 b�IMp1 UVER OF 4U1q/
j � PWJTS AS NOTEO ON LEGBlD �
T �
.� �' '
��� /'F�.runtfilEtrt wEa t��£ ��:
�RFf•..W!ED l�i"&1 C1x.'A - 1. PIANi 31RUBS OF iHE S�1E SPECES tll C�i0UP5 - _ _
�'�. � PEMOYE AlL 71E3.NRIAP a COt1TAN6iS.FPff PHOIEIHi Id00T8 OF 7 b e AS APPROPf W7E
PROM NU0.5ERY BhLL . 2 IXUV�tE PIT TO Fl1LL OEGT1 OF ROOT MA55 N�
��-'.:,f ;�../ r CMIOPY DUMETE0.SPREAD ROOTS TO FUl i _
WqTH OF GINOPV.
7DEEPSYICFAFORWA7ER 1 E�DWAYTMROU(',HqJV77NGA0UAGROF0IW L I
eaUnMc Wm[vEGErAncw �ABIET AI�WATER TMORWGMIY.
`L.�� ' � (�[iuv[D��OCRORC�E9; � I. 6�CICFILLT09ECOMPALTEOUSN6N017ERQLV. _ �" --
�; ' .. . D(GVATETREEiRTOMiHOF�TNES�AOFN001HK1AT S. WAT93�edEDtATELYAFTEftPf5TN1AT10N. '-
.'.�" B�1LL WlfER TM£PINR PIT OHIIOEM FHSH fiRAOE zO
m
i r� �` i �.��.M,��,.,u W,�,�e,.� • ',`'�'�— ;� � i
(`- � - � aRaFHI�SCALE SETBALLONWA�,,,PBED�6RAOEORCOIP,IC,ID e. -
rzs*a�cx�mEvecr�r�rro� �7 3�J 60 �d • �� < `;� ��� PREP0.RE0 BY:
II�T�.`Mm NN IPoiEciF]7 "�1.[�r'�+-ji�� �` / /J
'- � NOTEWORKPER�E&TERRDOiSFREEOFlA/qSERYBILLLdSPREADOVE0.E7fCAYATBYPlT.BALLdPR708E CJOUI2lCVLECV C..OlI1UCtR11E1_
i lNCA�-=a 30 FEEI'(24'z38') COARSar3CMIFl� �
Eav.rv��m.:cul,\arv��l R.��wr�..�c�Land l sc Coesclr.nn
WETLAND BUFFER FENCE DETAIL �'°��'"'"'"``"°nvc °fe''`'""'''
Giqlf.ssb��r.lC'.19N33i fas 'Sliiib9ii
PLANTLIST NOTTOSCALE a��,.. -t�..�.
�F�NAL LOCATiCMJS A/O OWNTRIES TO BE FIELD IOCAiED BY f�SPONSIBLE WEiI/1ND SCIBft15T ACCORdNG PREPAREO FOR:
8-0'OC YAX
Tosr��cs��c�,�r� DETENTION POND OUTFALL DETAIL A CAPASIGN•SEE +n'�rw�Rae�
oeraa eQow � TOP OF POSTS TO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTiNG
TREES (ASNEEDFD) SPACNG OWN7T' _�. -_-- .—__'GRAP SCALS - r .. � � _C1_ TREATEDORCEDRR2'x6'BOS PROMOTEORAWACiE
sr� st�rr�nciw+� caMwon r+� tcr o.c.i s¢e cM�M c�P�xl � ao I �'� \\\\\\\ � ; � au�rr-�ioTir�i r4m�REE 3"120 s- ENGINEERS,INC
� . . \` 18215 72M7 AVEMIE SOlIR7
P59/DOTSUGA lB¢F91 DOlN3LA4 FR t5 2 fsAL 1t ` �\ \\ \�\ t" 'J BOX FE/10 N/ULS EACH END KQti.WAS!&i('TON 9BD72
, AC87MACRORM.LlAIt B1GtEAFYAPIE t5 3G�L 71 1 L�CH = 20 FEF.T 4'7C38') � �...� �� w
� rrruuaxwrn vvEsmwr�ocEwn �s zcx H - �� �'��' \� b Q QUADRANTHOMES
� P/f,EA Sl7pfE1157S 51MA 97RUCE /3 Y dLL 11 /� �, +�.� \-•��\\\-• 18•� 7j �w 14725 SE 36TM STREET.SUiE t0U
t _- - � � �� �� ` .� . o o ea��.wnsHr�tori sewe
S�11BS �ASNEED� SPACNO QlwJr�7Y �� i - �� ���' 1�.��'�- �n
SYLBOI SC@/TT-0C NA�E COW WN 1M1E IF'f OLJ 3�0�) (���0 \ ;��- /�� \�,I, � 1G TYP
� 7? p°� PROJECT LOCA710N:
� �
� ��C°���" �"�E x �� �� `�� ' �� . r� c' `� nuF"S�S 5001 SOUTHEAST 2ND PLACE
� ra�ss�aa�w �curtniw� z �oK i� �� -�`�- \ � �. ,� rz ToeEcuv�n� " �3
�" � � o a�TREATEO°R s•e�aa RrP.) RENTON,WA 98059
:3. aas�Mrr�ur� raoTxn aose z �r,K ,3s i� -�i_�� ° ' � /`\ �_ t.�-�, �\\ +�u c�a rosTs ca�us�aoa�c�� KING COU
su�eucusaocEuas� r�ao�wv z �cu �ae I �/ , '=���\ , ~\ ���/ � �= �� .\ cenut w coHrncr w�n� oR coNca� ( NTY)
� �`/�� �y ��cur.r � ,i _ "-------- �`;,, sa��sw�www�oNo sre-�awuscoswnc�ID �s•wra�rrr.�
� RGBUS SPECiA�.rS SAt►AOHBERRY 2 1 Gnl 138 t��j J ��� ������ ` =`l 1 � � _ _�--- �� MORE TFUW TYYO YEAF25 CttU511m ROGC BASE
BVFFERSEFDYOC NE�E It`I ( +1 I � �``� \ `'�, .� �~\��� � /---J . ..,�\,� ca,v�creowirne►a��w. � Pao,�cr nn�:
l� �l �crirter uurxnrv ` • ` � . , • �- �.�'�', • �. V . . a \ i � �•
u�� ��E � ��.� NOTE SUBSIMEFENCENPEMAYBEALLOWED COPPERWOOD
IF APPROVED BY PROJECT MANACaER AND PROECT BIOLOGIST.
ar�«�cus e�rr�°`tYE 'g BUFFERAVERAGINGAND
�s,�c��ss o�,o� +S CRITIACL AREA PROTECTION AREA(CAPA)SIGN ENHANCEMENT PLAN
�s�vraia�u r�o�sa� ,s DETENTION POND OUTFALL DETAIL B HorToscwe
3o ies��caE
BRORa15CMtatAius UUFORNABRprE ts CRAPH7C SCAIE-'• � -, ♦ � � SHEE7 11iLE:
LIRlIUSPOLYPHYIWS Wt6ELEl1FLI�FE 15 � CaruiNa •-12X1E'PLUMNUMSIGNNTTHNMITEftffLECTIVE
10 0�. , '.� `,� \..,�'��� Rormm M.a BACKGROUND.INSTKL ONE PEA PROTECTm FEATLRE IN
HDFmEIMBRACNYANTIBiUN YEAOdYBANLEY <'-L� _—' ACONSPICUOVSPLACE
„ ' :- \ �`�, \�� �``s_ MWWUMOFTWOGALVAMZEDOftSTANLESSSTEEL PLANTING PLAN
1 INCH= 10 FESf(24��18"}�, .- ��.�� � � ���\ WOOO LA(i B�LTS TO RRlIY SEL79iE SIGN.
i6 '§; 1
i�RAP PAO�EER 9PEfiltATqN9) � �-i�r' � � \ �%4 PRESSURE TREAlF�OR CE�AR POS7 W/iH
R
.. XF`r }. \ 1!2'GMIIM1FER OR�AT TOP.
�
' �1 � ��� \� J06 NUMBER:
norFs: ,� ,�;� ��� 'F.
1. AWALIFFEOPROFESSIONAIYYETLNIDSPECUl�ST(RESPONSIBLEWE7LAN�SCIENTISn ;l �--k;-_ � -:,.. ,1\ _ OUIqCSETCONCREfEOR
swti�oveasEE n�n+snuunowcaru-rauenoH oF nu une,�noN auw e��erts. . , 7sx�z,= ��, "' sro�rtxrs eow�v�erEn aiusHm rmeac 1186.0�05
2 ALL VEGETATIDN REAqVK AREAS St4LL1 BE FEtD IOCATED BY 71E RESPONSIBLE f � � T D
� i= n !�.. WARMRAD- I
YYETLAND SCiENTiST PRIOR TO M(Y CLEARNG MAIOR GFlDUNU DISTURBRNCE I COI�PAC7E0 NATNE►1NTERIAL OR
7. AlL PlM(i CO('ATIONS 70�COORDNYIT�WIiH T!E PESPONS6LE NIETLAlD SqEM15T � �J�:��N 37 } 518 M14NUS COMPALTED CRUSM�ROCK
PR10R TO INS7ALUilON . !� .�� 4� �:�~ � ��. ��� CRfTICAL AREA PROTECTION AREA(CAPN&GN NOTES:
� � t ��"� 1. GPASIGN59WLLBEPIACEONOGREATER7WW t00FEETMARTAROUNDTHE DESIGNED BY: JD
,I STA��BUBfYiMEATO7716d' � Sl'�i- r�� �' �'' . PQtIMETEROFTHE NATIVEGROWiHCPoTKALAREAPRQTEC710NARFA
�._,�.�:..t..{ ._ �_.. � DRAWN BY: JR/DS
I �,r 1 � \� Z n�Tenn�un��s�s�icas�rae�asn�rrr�������' CHECKED BY: JD
� CiEOTIXTILENIlRICMDWC�TOlE ' _. '\ � FORMPFiOYAL
� PIACECUPTOCRONARYHqH11917ERWYaG_'_'"-� �`,��� ,,, ,.
,. „LL�,,,5,�,5T���+o��r. DATE: 4/24/2015
4. nu.s�cr�s a.m.m n�we�uw n euF�ea�r ro ee r+srnLLEu oNsrre w REVI S ED:
c�u�r wsie�iocAnoNs.
SHEET REV.
WL-3 �
3�4 �
� ��x � � � � w a
W ,^n1 F 8 g o Z Z � �
�' � � � � q w � av°', 0 a � � � �n
� '`a ` � ? O � p � � z�� �y ? F F. O � `L � o
O � G� ' O m � � x � c� NQ� 7r � Z Q O �
f-
Cl : � ZW �� � �� �30 � � w (� � r `" F—
w � ra ' » � � � � �°z G' ¢ � LL °p m m � w J o
� � Zd t p �
° `� ' `' ' � `�' � � � ° = � � N�Y � c�.> mW � a � � � Z � � n 3 v
a� � �j � F
.Pi O k'� ` S m � �p � tj � 2 � � W � �
� y ff
w � �U . w o o w W � 2 Q W
ae azvo rrouaroosaa Nois�a a a a a � � 0 0 U 0 �'
���a� �� � o
g���� �� � � �
����� ���� � � �
����� � ��� � � �
����� � ��� � � �
�
�g�°� � �o� ��� �
N � < N
�
a�°r�� m ff�ff �$� �
��'�!dy��� i�H � _
~�V�F � t�a� �-m �
��am1y�� � �<��y ��� ��y
'"���N� � ��s5 �� O
� iu N �
LL <� �W s�
��� � � ��� ����g
��� � � �� _
������ �� �g���
pp m� ��� �� �
�
uT7dW��� A � (70t7<<
�Y
����F� ����a����
������ �N � . ��
_= OTF-pLL O�W W > W S t� (J p � WOW O F ZI-RO»�-J WW W
� ��� ��� ����9 ����a��m ��� �'���< ��� �������� �� �W ���o�i����� �o'�m���� ���� ��p�
�g ao5 yyyy''�� so Z� �+; a o �y� w�5 2]��n" �y �� (� w q
Wz �` ��� 0����� �Z�aq�� � � � � Z �� �� ����~ � � LL�uZ 6 ��U �-�4S��� Z � � g�y
� ��U pLL t� O N� H 1 � Q Q �y �Q � 2 � i
���y �, ��� �`� Oc��O �Z I��y°� m��c���� S� � �y�yI�6��� �`�� �P� i� ���� �� g �#1lI ��� �i�� � Z
'-{ ��w� �� ����o�- ��3qf� 6'� a�LL € �'gO �� �-{�Fg�� � �{a� �� `� LL�5( ����jin � t, �-���� W
F o � W ����Qa� � WO� '�� a � � � �� 2u�z W�LL � �� S > LL �i �� �� Z � � � ��m
� �N �����0�� � �� � ¢ � � � ��3 �r� $� �� �,���s�� N $ �� ����°���� � ��s� � ��N�� �
� � �� � LL� �� � � � � �w�
� ���� � ���� g�W� �����$ ��i� ���0 8 @>°���� '����R �g�� � �� � ��d� � �� �"�� `i'�o�,U $
� � �8 � �_°���� � � � �5<� ��� �y�> ��l� # ��@�5 �Q���o��� -� � � �y��� �N� ` ���� z �yQyJ�p)y ��
CQ � �tN _yr�5w� y � W�v q F �� O y!� $} cS�O�y J ull/r8 ���j^ � i(f �5�� aQ � S$� 3�3�1-p �K
� � 0��� g g � F6�� ¢�� � <Q� � w� 2 � �i ma2 ���� � F yI�t � F Cz4�!��uyi� H}$�LL� � �y 5 � F O.{
� � 6��1� . drQf���Q � ��� >2� � ���� '� � u' �j ���� F t�9 Q ��`Y'"'� ��LL ��J�j ����� �i
� W ��� �� � �5 �i � � � � QQQ,,, � �� �����4�w � g$�� ���, ��y{ �Z Y�r �F ��� 3 �� �
� � ���p ��� ����m�6 � � ��� � u� � �� �j���q U�� �T 4.oDi��� ��K � la F� � � � <�C1 ��� � � � ��
� � �� � �g��� �� � � 0���7 � . ��� � .�$3 ��� � _���� �° ��� � � ��� �� �� � �� � � � �
� �� � � 2 �mJ����� � �cH j fy�1i� � � 2 y8' ��Ap � �5� s � � � .r�5jrc 3� �� � �`az� �
Z � ��� � m 2��T�j =� � � S �W By �.��s��� � LL Uf9� � ��� � 0N . ��j � �F ����RLL �� � ����� ��3�� ��
W �y ,✓� r�s
J � � �#SF � � o��� ���� _ � �������� rn4�� p�;�o��y, � ���"� � �� ����� Q�� � � '� a� �Q � i��� � �'w �i
N m � {vq�y�( 7�� �t5s� y,oW y� � �W �y. }�i�y � �y�O �1L �� ��ay�� o �p��LL ��y
Q M � �F��Q � ���������Z�� �i �0!y����" �^!�9-� ���y�vY � N�Q��� ��Wm����v y Z �S� m�� W;� �e y,���� mJF.(�y� 7� O �Z
� N Z � �C3 ��NN <� � q �� g� �l �0�� = w3 � � ���o� Q ���� � r� ��i ����,��� o (� ����LL �v�i � ��
a O �� � B �������� � � � +���� H�� ��g�$�� � � � �� �� �� yY ��� � o �! �'o �N� � .-
Z 2 �' m�i�� � � `�ff� & � � ���o s` � w ��o �� � �a��= ��< ��4� �'��� ��`������ �'� �� ������z �r� R - ���
W y z � ��� ������ g��� � ����Z � �� ��@� o� � � �� �� � �m� � � ���� �� � �� o���� z �o�� �r
—T a�� � = wWJ � € yy� �oW� a g�' >S < ¢���( �� � �,� �(�� � Yi � B$ � 8� � 7rc ����� �`�g�'
� � + � I� �' O ��3O�F-�� O C N A �O� � tll ����� � � C W a ����F � ���� ��� � ��{��� (1 ���jO� .�� pW �F• a
� Q �� ���� y��� °�y����� w ��,� �"'� � � ���� �� � �°� ^ o�� � � �� R� � �������s �� ��o� ?� ��r�� � �t�
0
V� �; 3 �� ���� � ��m������a�� � �o������ �� a m������ � ������ � ��g������ ���� ���� �m��������� ������>��� ������ ��g
W � z
Z 0 �wo� iw�LL<o ,�oa �n w>r��cwo� p ���+ � w w� = o o z w Y � w Ti-W[�W
o � �H�� ��LL��s � � �� �. ��x ��� � � � o � � � � �� x�y�w �$mZ�
F- 2 �'� � �k'���� E�S��u �s� ����i�,��� � �,�?��_ ��m=H� �� o � � ����� �� � � ��$ � �� �B�W� ���E� �o
W � ��y��r � F�� ����� ����J���Za� °�wZg oa�� <y� ¢ � � �� ~ W ��� W LL > � N� �
� � � "� � � "��&�� t+���� m ��� < �B ��� <q� 8� �<< z� � $�� � �Z� � _ � � �
O LL Q p '�i �����w�'��o � ��o�� �mu�u� � "���� ��gul'� i2 � � �3�� � � � -F�N N � 2
� �'< o��� �a � � � ��� g � � � � �s � o� � � �
O � � ���q�� ����s�W��`� �J���������� � ����� ���3ls��� ��yI� � � � °��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ���o�+� ����� �
� W V ���FF �����g�o��� <����� N�=�'� s ��mN� �LL���� F a � �� ����q�y �� �� ��� � �� ���5� �g
y �o u �' � �� o �= cm a� J �y � m -� �� y� u�r �Y� �
W= Q�� C�CT N 4� g LL yy�LL��y Q � }3 r W �0�Wy 10-� J m � � p,�O � W N S W(J V!� �m
� � �� ��LL � ��� �g�o ��g��S�Z � < "� �� �� �� � � ��s ��' � �� �� � r� ��m � ���,8�j �
` �Q%�! �W^���N��(�� W�6�F�y�Wf/1W�p12 � �Gt�`� 4l/l��UQ� ��p� � �� � VOW� WN2 � �� � � � fI� �W��2 2�4�T N�
y �+ yq <rF W(J K� T 6 O W H y! �z11 Ti y� Gl
W � a�b F �z s O= m N"�� € �I;N Z�2 LL W � 5 W 2� � H�`2 F � V W � F� �!73 � ~ ` U 0 �Q W N m �
� �" � �m ���u�g��� ��� ��$����_���J ' � � �_� "��z°� � � � � "� � ����pQy� �� ��< mp � � ��J ��y����� �� �� �m
� ����� �yJ�?�.�eo�F��'� �WO�K��W�Y�-�� W �LL� � y�(����O � W �t� � �pd s ��9y� � W � �y� ly W 2Q y =mW �O�W� N
a � � N ��mj�F Wy Z �dLL�JN WO � �mW � W ZW 0 �U ` O LL F F O�Z a 6 U�� Hyl �F�HJJZ N2 W� ��
6 � S C $�y w �u��y � �z � ZwZ �� a k'� �� °a��' � gi m�oZ �5zy �
O O ��O�y ���U���rs2�33� ��Y�IYtI-lo �� � GQ a0 �5Km�� �.�� < �~ �y w pVFE �4 W �L�� � �� �Y k6 �m q m}4�
� �l2^ ��W� F[76z �a'�S�'�l'r��°� 4 ��f� �Fz"�mua� $Yo ` � �wZ� yS�S �'z su�l c� a ~p a¢��zw ���$� pa
(� (q/� yyy�l��� Vy. J y ) ( �11
, ♦ O �� �� -d�W� V~Z Z� �N W����a W LL ����� �F��W J V ��O��� (�F{ � a ��� � e�l~ � W O 3�� ��j K V W
V d ��� � ��y� ��o�d��� � �y��� �tQp �wy�m �. �a$ < �� ��ya � � �� pp� aW��� �¢p� � '� „ $ � �� 3 �o t`�3y� ��$�°� ��'
Q a��f �u� �y'�> O> ~��?� rF ���1�� { �� Vl~I����F¢����� �UK .� G �LL�LL�W� �a � �W g�ri � t % ��J�=wO N171L�Z ��
awd o <�iL��Ny < � g 3 y� F � a �o � �- � � � �y p
LLLL ,�,� LL Q f� !� yF W 21� {J 7, N m y a r LL 2 UJy �{ OI-Q mF
p�Om� �y�LL � �� ��O N3W�N�Y Zt ��� ��Q�NO� aL4 W { Z�< �O � �� � Z � 7f1 �-}g �j� N
4Yp > `j � � QN 7Q, m � gyW t IL hn J (�
amoZ Om 2 ��FE�6�J��Jy~ ' ��WNm�y ¢� �� a O C1QN!��OjO�N(11 �a�'� F� � ��j`�QO� �47 � � �u7� �u� �' � n�pta� �� ��y�"� C JZ
< S < 2" �1 �W W O < y FO� ��` yy �
m y� D m �Q p vl �J W W �/ K Gy� LL1 U N X
� O� T��N �i mLLSj U' 5 W � � ��� < � ^� �J>� ���5� �i�� m � � k}�� W� � LL� E Sg �� -WV��a �
���� 14Wiw �nw�nd3��'u�2��� ` �� N�a��c7 i� aa�ow �< �o �r �� ����� � Y �� �i ��d �u� � � pZulw�jy� �r-$ w �
� Y �'�`5��g�Z€p�Y. gZ� ��Q �o�������i �� ��'���a�r���1Y �q�����LL �3� �� �' °Z n, �U ,;'� 1k �Si ~ 'W � �rc�mQ�� N�a�w � o
'�.� w�<�N�W6W���� KW���#Oy ��Q}� � � /-U'�.7�=WU'F(��mtl ]� y F<�Z7e� a �� � LL�� ~ � �` 2�� �m��'Tj �F-
wy'S LL4�O�tl�� [7 2�� �I��������-��;5 ��� � ' O; a�Orc���� ��W� � O � � �� �OUN � � �i��•LLLLW �K �� ��
��9 � ��`"a'�� �� �< �mm �� �µ� � � � ������������������a���� �� ��� �� �� � � � ,;�<���� ������ ��
����� _������������ ������������� ��� . . . . . . . . ������ �I �� � :������ ������ ��
ewZ2 W 4NU' P <N�W O< !/l � R NO W W �ul 2 IIl C a�F2Ti4- 2 �Yl �W K Om
F O N mH y ui>r (9oF:h > ¢ p
� � � �-LL �� �k � a�� �{ � �
as� � $� � � �- � LL � � �` � � �� �j�� � � � ���c ����� � �
c��}um� $��"�����N C 5�3� � � k����g^��� ����� �a� aS ���� ��� ��$�So�� ��� ������� � � W €� � m�����
�i����o����k�� ��;��� � ���`�i�g��� �3�'��W�� Y�ih���$rcx��o&� �����<�_� �� q�ou�Q�� g o�;��� ���� ��
'u7
��� �p�g���yJ �� �"' m�g � ���������� W������y �>��Ca;t�o���pZm�s $��<y�����µ/C( p� � qrI$.]�c�¢�<y���� � ��r �����
�v��F� l(�il�4� 17u1� ��p�} �LL W �4 0��z ���y,� S W Z C= F�LL�W<O 8 y� � yQ`�µ2I��W M � �y�{s f��H � W V ��U 3 �y� �
������o�` a �� K�� $�N� Q �Zmw3 O � [� p�ZO �Wm� � �O�j F �� .�� O�� �;� �� mj� 2 < �t�
�`�F�p°Q����;�J�¢���5�� �����,s�u1 �y.� ��;�s�� �$zQ ���� w�F��� a<�� � �<w�u,���� � � W�� Op��Z� o�y77 �yZ1 �IY p(w� ���p$
S W - � "LL G a �g�F$ v N�a� -2 u�F��p p c� ��'�p`� 1- F�O z w � ��� <<3 ~O �F�~ J�~��Z�+
G1
3w:[�t���>� ��o'a ��gr�c�N�2S ��a��� �°�� � �aa���� �� �� F����y� �qy����� 8 0 ���>� ��1y h�� � �c�� ��3
�W� � ���j�4�� �S SwvT��w � Y � Fot � ��3a4.ZF �vi�������� Wa� �! r �� � �� mW�Ci �J'iF �Q� ��'� �
�h � a LL6 -� �w < � k' � o � ] z '� � > s
�� � � ��o� e������� ��������� �<������ ������� ���m � ����� �� ��� e�������� ��3��d�� ��� �5�
u��� � � � ��,�� �� � � �'�' ��3��g< � �����',��-�1y�w �_ �Z�� `� ��� ��� Q .�, � �w ��
5��wy�?� �LL ; .� ��g��� YS� �`� ���04 ��wu°�i<t m°� �a uw �C�t � m }�4��� y�� a ''� a .�< �y ���{ E��
��W��bQ�������g �$�� �d� K'�� oo�s'�'�zu`�� o�"��~� �`����-' �`� �F32�; -� � vi�'u � �p v�i8�� �� 'd���
�� ���;�LLff�� �� W������� ���������� �����o�� �� � � m��� ,� ��m����� a�� �������W��� �� �a��°� _ �����
Z Tt��' f- ti O- < ��n O > y > p-�
�„�sFs���iW$'Ss�C�d O : �,aT �- r� ��� �� �� �~ � ��J`�'�� � ���� � ��$ `�Q�' �� ��'�� „��'��� '���$ �� S'�
� x�-„"'-o < r { � � 5
uWi� � a WW�mdu�o� a=�< H ��� ���� �5�� ��w � �� 2 � ��2�� F � �� rzz�{ ��� Z(�r�SW ��
�'�� ����p��o�µ�511; � ���"'�� � �(t���y������� �������� �yt�'�y3 ��s �y�11�I��'� � *�a��b�� W � ��� �ga��°Z���,5 ����x�j_��� �(Zj�`��°�
�:.0 �� �F'u13w�� �¢w� y�6 < K m �R prNC7> ''<� �ioy � <S�u10O� � �Fl�p�Ig�7� OJ ryn�Q<� Oz2�(�<t� LL N� ug G�
!aQ t�� �F� X �� Ba F VR'� zoC y�� �����S(� �U �y�� Oy}�,�� �j� Z ��,5$y W � 0 F�U �ty`2 V`O:OrLL �����yU � J W�h� ���u�gW�
F �3� �~O <�W Q N W���,�� 1U , b� � �(��< �F� 7���� �� Z�Ny �W�����> U�LLy. jQF,3LL �y(�� �DS oozK� �Z No €���N F � o O
����� ��������� O��Y K �~ SW�V�6V�W ry� W �~ W . C�� 3 �N� o ¢ � 2y7 =� A�yL. �G � ��� S �O ���(JDN
� ��d� 0 �� �3 a� y� � H �l� �H N� ���� ��1 � � ��H � � y'� V�� � �i �� ��� ~=Q�} Sg � 3 Q ���G
� � S���a� ��w md 1a� w- oW O °�� �yI�n��Zao rcw � r= mwg�Sg�-�y� y, �a F� � x � y � ~ � v�i�� 3
� �� a¢ �yI� � W h) �� a � (J F< 3(*J y Q�J�' u� `u�LL ¢a� LL � � � w�� 42�F777��� � p
N �Z �LL���>=�_�� N�~��D��Z W2�y,Z�U���C�FU�O ����Z��`� � ��}yz1 O��Nma 0���� ��y�� �ayy�'��� F HN�g}���µ F� �I�y g5�� ��� �<=
� W�WZ�� ����Ow� ��wR�I, OV11y aW0-> �Y� Z ����y� _� ����NNNFaU���3 ��1- ~�pO 6� � � =f o ,� � O � O�W�� � �� F
� <70 IJ O 7 � g z�
�uIF4 r Oa� Nq �� F w d a3u� 1� � � zzz�ia � E � � t� oF v� J
�+ < y �wy� ��sLL o k' u ��d � c� owu F�� w mg000�'o � � < �m w d� � � 6� o� a
�i �i LL��� V �a O�� 4�� 'w �wu�l�j �Z�d ��i�L�i r�K � wa- � � ��F � S�L�� �62 = �33�� ��� H � ~ �C��
� � �����a���3��y ������_��w ����ff���a��a� �€������3 ��a������������ ��������� ��g� ����������= a�������� �����N�
7.0 OTHER PERMITS
7.1 Postmaster/Mailbox Locations Approval
7.2 Hydraulic Project Approval
7.3 NPDES Permit from the Department of Ecology dated February 19, 2015
16834.015.doc
7. 1 Postmaster / Mailbox
Locations Approval
, `.� ;� i 1�, �- - - ., �c�
.�
.�:��,.,..t.r �`.-�~` 7�' _.._ �. _ -_ � t`�, ..-;',-- i.
� �� �
� ���� ��� � .
� � �, 'k=j; "-�,�,� � �__.�
t �r�
� OVERALL UTILfTY PLAN " f�} \ :_' ;
�I -- -- � {J�r � << �
° �:_� �, ��F��'�w��� ' . E`. '`�Qt ��s,; ','
�► -
�.�, - {,'--� prr�c�'�-�r�r�'Ila.c��rr�sEVa a=�c s ' ���, .
�- ;, ,- � r�.r.�K aa�s r�ost.w.� .`� �t`t, )_ J':�'`f
`�� � �ti 1 C7tr CF F$dTCN KBJI�tXXJtfT`Y. SiAlE CF WP9-iv.�.rCrt .. : - j�'
L3 ` ' .� °J-`'`�� '=f'
b : , '- - - �
rJ --- � >---� ~-.
� ` ' --- : .. f�„-,�_ a.:a ��RGlAIftiCMB. i.., ._ ,
; 0. :t� --- �,,,_�:T,.. � ft�l=-��'��y— — -- -- _ - _."?� _�.. _ �---_--�—. --- --
� � : . '=----'<��- ' ,T_ ... _�_ � - -� —'--- ,_ � �i ._... . _.' 1
(} - ' � . .-__ — ,". �, � ,_._._ - ✓
_ i
� 1 �� _1 27�i 2P � � (' � � --- -' ` i l+ � �
_I � 'I-- - I "^ � ! i --i. I 46 ; asuac� � r i
, _ ___� — , __ _ _., �.Y E.�,l , I
r : :i i I' �
� 2 � ; � � .�s . � � -�_. _ ;-''_- � ����.� �
,� �--- � . �I —._I � 1= _ ___—� ! ' ' �
� i I���-� � ± ; � __ _ ---I_.. ; � _� � �� � �i ! i i
3 ' 25 �p ` I---� ; ;q� �`; �
� � l�_ _i � ; ' � —� i !I i _ �; --� ( __ ��ti �
_— _ : _rt � ',,, ,�
�y I � � � � i I—--I I, I•--- I r -- � � � ��,t� �
� i , � . 24 I � 3i__ � � — - --� .� '�
�-- � I r � � ^'� 'a�� t '
� I S =__ � � -�- ��I f -'—I� I —_ I '�� `+�� � :
�_ sx � � �� _ , ti
` � i � � � � E _ _ j 7 , �I : � ,\
� �_. . �---:� �� �� _a� _— �—'-- ' at — �! `�� ,\` �`;`\ .
h�= — ' ��j — � i ,); L � --- � � t..�,� , ��;..� `,, �, i
� . � � •.
�, - -- _---- -=-- I 1 d0 }-.-..-t �1kaa�,�m.rn�cr c�;: '
7 ` _�'2� "I j -- --�--I r � �-- .n rn •� ._ �_..-... _._ .. __5� �\` �` �
-,� �'`�—__- t I _I_ (� I f ; t. - �� -- r -\ '� �`:, �
.\1�` (' B �I j _ ---_-_� i - i � --I. � {�� '�.--i�a: ; j�`� —!~'� ,r:t� �_-�=�-.y,.`y_ �,:. -
�
�� ' --- _ -�� ' �I��J I � � -� �' 37 ' 38 • �� � �`?�� '��`. ( _,T,�
...-- � - � � i l�. . �• � �--- -�� 's f � i" ����
—..— �
r�"` t-- I _ _ -.. _ - � — - -•� ��r� I� ��� �,:1 �y� ��r •�ti`�
,: 9 1 ; � I i �- i � '�
. � � -� - � � �� �' �S'`\ , ti� t `�� i �- •
- ' � � I i9 35 tr i y \. �. t � °;\'',. 'i, /��
---=�r � _� L :i. , � � i ,� \ '�, �, � t •� ' ���
�-•—� tt �,, � ..._ -`- ;' �� , '�., = � . t ��-�'t'
�� • \;I
�,. ,
�; �:. � .� _� ��' ` ► i
_ ;=� =-- .___.- - -- - -- �--- I j�� - �,�1!�;' ti � I = :�
` - ' � :�_t_ -- - ��� _ =� � �� �� ��.. � I �, ��.
y ��.: '1
i 3T biMl� Tfu�cT�` � I-- L�^� _�.i'� �I ����� f � _ >
i -�'_ -•� ,� 4 �'' I/ _ C
} : -��� -�,� �; -- ��. , - :�,- �� , t � � � � ��
_ ii n � � Iti � ,: � i � I � �� � � ,� '�� �s��� l " - •f' <� '� �`
�=
��- i ; � , ,j,p�� •I ( ' � � s
� � �: :, �.� .
� I , '� , � ri Y`;-. s�
- -�!� - - . � i_ -I �- -!�L - -'�I-- .� y `� _ '''/ ;'I' � � `
= --"-- _- - : _ _- - ' I 'i ��`..,: ...1� fr� '`�1_ ..:
, .�.=— r� � .� _
- ------- --- i . . .- , ir
_ j - N � �,:
I �rn�c e gF•
stone r,oNo w+o �'q
� Q@1�/�.%l4Ci � �"}'� _,s, «
� �d. �} �
b •.
� CiTY Q��tJ'fC7N 9 ��•'� 9
.
• c��r+.+2.rr oe-.w_�c.vor.r�
, rrr� .r : —. f - ii _ 'C _ GYEfZr�.L��Y p1--AN �c' •so�+ �g
: _
.
- •
- 'rc.°" —` .�' _--- . .-.._ � - ( �
1 C�
. r _- _�-_._. ____ -- � _. . _ . ��'k� _ -
�.�.. -` Y
. A i
� .t G`I�:I i��1
, YR�r ___ _'." ..."' .._ " -_ _. ' L I � �L `
. _ _ -- -- �� ,,rl.�j .,,,-r� .--��. .�,.� � 72 ST. 200 W
-
� � � -- _ _ - � m..
.�� __� ._ _ .� ---
j ..�. j ��.r_v� __, ,�r v�• _� -- �••.� 6�L.EVIJ�.WA980UB 'S "q aUi
�: v-+a�w -- "�n •-....__._ ,. ...
__ - - - - — _ � - �J��.Ij'•l"'..:r.�--
■ ■
7.2 Hydraulic Pro�ect Approval
-' Washington Department of
Fish 8 wldlife
� HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL PO Box 43234
FiSH����1ILDLI�E Olympia,WA 98504-3234
(360)902-2200
Issued Date: December 03, 2014 Permit Number: 2014-4-391+01
Project End Date: December 02, 2019 FPA/Public Notice Number: N/A
Application ID: 1989
PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR
Quadrant Homes Soundview Consultants LLC
ATTENTION: Barbara Rodgers ATTENTION: Hannah Blackstock
14725 Southeast 36th, Suite 200 2907 Harborview Dr
Bellevue, WA 98006 Gig Harbor, WA 98335-1911
Project Name: Copperwood Residential Plat
Project Description: The Applicant proposes a single-family residential development within the approximately 12.68-
acre subject property. The proposed project includes demolition of all but one of the existing
residences, removal of scrap and debris associated with the previous residential land use,
clearing and grading for construction of approximately 47 residential housing units with
driveways, parking areas, associated utilities and infrastructure, and buffer reduction,
averaging, and enhancement actions. The proposed project will also provide fully engineered
stormwater facilities to the City of Renton's standards. The southwest facilities will require
placement of a stormwater outfall and pervious walking trail along with minor grading actions
within the stream buffer and minor buffer reduction via buffer averaging in the southeast corner
of the site. The alignment of the outfall has been designed to avoid significant native conifers,
and temporary impacts will be limited to the smallest area necessary to allow installation
located immediately outside of OHW. Any impacts associated with the installation of this outfall,
low-impact trail, minor grading, and buffer averaging will be mitigated for through non-
compensatory buffer enhancement actions. ,
PROVISIONS
1. The project may begin immediately and shall be completed by December 2, 2019, provided outfall construction
within the ordinary high water line (OHWL) shall occur only between July 1 and September 30.
2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the Washington Department
of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) entitled, "COPPERWOOD BUFFER AVERAGING AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN", dated I
November 10, 2014, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA). A copy of these plans and this HPA
shall be available on site during construction. '
3. The stream bank at the point of the discharge shall be armored to prevent scouring.
4. Excavation for the placement of the outfall structures or armoring materials shall be isolated from the wetted
perimeter.
5. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream.
Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work
activities along the stream.
6. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be
deposited above the limits of floodwater in an approved upland disposal site. �
Page 1 of 5
� Washington Department of
Fish&Wildlife
� HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL POBox43234
a�^����: Olympia,WA 98504-3234
FlSHaa fi7LDLfFE
(360)902-2200
Issued Date: December 03, 2014 Permit Number: 2014-4-391+01
Project End Date: December 02, 2019 FPA/Public Notice Number: N/A
Application ID: 1989
7. Disturbance of the streambed and banks and wetlands and their associated vegetation shall be limited to that
necessary to install the project. Affected areas of vegetation shall be restored to preproject or improved habitat
configuration. Prior to December 31 of the year of project construction, the disturbed areas of vegetation shall be
revegetated with native woody species approved by the Area Habitat Biologist (AHB) listed below. Plantings shall be
maintained as necessary for three or more years to ensure 80 percent or greater initial survival of each species or a
contingency species approved by the AHB.
8. If at any time, as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality
problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), immediate notification shall be made to the Washington
Emergency Management Division at 1-800-258-5990, and to the AHB.
9. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. These may include, but
are not limited to, straw bales, filter fabric, temporary sediment ponds, check dams of pea gravel-filled burlap bags or
other material, and/or immediate mulching of exposed areas.
10. Prior to starting work, the selected erosion control methods (Provision 9) shall be installed. Accumulated sediments
shall be removed during the project and prior to removing the erosion control methods after completion of work.
11. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments,
sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the
stream.
LOCATION #1: Site Name: Copperwood Plat
, Renton, WA
_ _--- __ __ ;_.__ _._ ._ __. _
WORK START: December 3, 2014 '� WORK END: December 2, 2019
WRIA Waterbodv: Tributary to: -�
i
08 - Cedar- Sammamish Maplewood Creek(rb) Cedar River
1 4 E : i n� Townshi� Ranae: Latitude: L n i Countv'
SE 1/4 15 23 N 05 E 47.479563 -122.152471 King j
Location#1 Drivin9 Directions
To access the subject property from the Tukwila area, via lnterstate 405 northbound, take Exit 4 toward Washington-
900/Bronson Way. Turn right onto Washington-169 north. After approximately 360 feet, take the first right onto Sunset
Boulevard North. After 0.2 mile, take the first right onto Northeast 3rd Street. Proceed 0.9 mile and continue onto
Northeast 4th Street. Proceed 1.0 mile and tum right onto Duvall Avenue Northeast. After 0.5 mile, Duvall Avenue '�
Northeast turns slightly to the left and becomes Southeast 2nd Place. The subject property will be located on the right side �
of Southeast 2nd Place after approximately 0.2 mile.
APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS
Page2of5
Washington Department of
Fish &Wildlife
� HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL POBox43234
u�A�^^m�^��+ Olympia,WA 98504-3234
F(Sfl m,a W7LDLIFE
(360)902-2200
Issued Date: December 03, 2014 Permit Number: 2014-4-391+01
Project End Date: December 02, 2019 FPA/Public Notice Number: N/A
Application ID: 1989
This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically
Chapter 77.55 RCW. Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person
(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional
authorization from other public agencies (local, state and/or federal) that may be necessary for this project.
This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person
(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s) performing the work.
This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass.
The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s) performing the work may be held liable
for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic
Project Approval.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalry of up to one
hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment.
All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued under RCW 77.55.021 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions, or
revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that changed conditions require such action. The person(s)
to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right to appeal those decisions. Procedures for filing appeals
are listed below.
MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS HPA:You may request approval of minor modifications to the required work timing
or to the plans and specifications approved in this HPA. A minor modification to the required work timing means up to a
one-week deviation from the timing window in the HPA when there are no spawning or incubating fish present within the
vicinity of the project. You may request subsequent minor modifications to the required work timing. A minor modification
of the plans and specifications means any changes in the materials, characteristics or construction of your project that
does not alter the projecYs impact to fish life or habitat and does not require a change in the provisions of the HPA to
mitigate the impacts of the modification. Minor modifications do not require you to pay additional application fees or be
issued a new HPA. If you originally applied for your HPA through the online Aquatic Protection Permitting System
(APPS), you may request a minor modification through APPS. A link to APPS is at http://wdfw.wa.gov/licensing/hpal. If
you do not use APPS you must submit a written request that clearly indicates you are seeking a minor m�dification to an
existing HPA. Include the HPA number and a description of the requested change and send by mail to:Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife, PO Box 43234, Olympia, Washington 98504-3234, or by email to
HPAapplications@dfw.wa.gov. Do not include payment with your request. You should allow up to 45 days for the
department to process your request.
MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS HPA:You may request approval of major modifications to any aspect of your HPA.
Any approved change other than a minor modification to your HPA will require issuance of a new HPA. If you paid an
application fee for your original HPA you must pay an additional$150 for the major modification. If you did not pay an
application fee for the original HPA, no fee is required for a change to it. If you originally applied for your HPA through
the online Aquatic Protection Permitting System (APPS), you may request a major modification through APPS. A link to
APPS is at http://wdfw.wa.gov/licensing/hpa/. If you do not use APPS you must submit a written request that clearly
indicates you are requesting a major modification to an existing HPA. Include the HPA number, check, and a description
of the requested change. Send your written request and payment, if applicable, by mail to: Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife, PO Box 43234, Olympia, Washington 98504-3234. You should allow up to 45 days for the department
to process your request.
Page 3 of 5
Washington Department of
Fish&Wildlife
� HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL POBox43234
��- - Olympia,WA 98504-3234
FISH a�e�1TLDLIFE
(360)902-2200
Issued Date: December 03, 2014 Permit Number: 2014-4-391+01
Project End Date: December 02, 2019 FPA/Public Notice Number: N/A
Application ID: 1989
APPEALS INFORMATION
If you wish to appeal the issuance, denial, conditioning, or modification of a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA),
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) recommends that you first contact the department employee who
issued or denied the HPA to discuss your concerns. Such a discussion may resolve your concerns without the need for
' further appeal action. If you proceed with an appeal, you may request an informal or formal appeal. WDFW encourages
you to take advantage of the informal appeal process before initiating a formal appeal. The informal appeal process
includes a review by department management of the HPA or denial and often resolves issues faster and with less legal
complexity than the formal appeal process. If the informal appeal process does not resolve your concerns, you may
advance your appeal to the formal process. You may contact the HPA Appeals Coordinator at �i60) 902-2534 for more
information.
A. INFORMAL APPEALS:WAC 220-110-340 is the rule describing how to request an informal appeal of WDFW actions
taken under Chapter 77.55 RCW. Please refer to that rule for complete informal appeal procedures. The following
information summarizes that rule.
A person who is aggrieved by the issuance, denial, conditioning, or modification of an HPA may request an informal
appeal of that action. You must send your request to WDFW by mail to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501-1091;e-mail to
HPAapplications@dfinr.wa.gov;fax to (360) 902-2946; or hand-delivery to the Natural Resources Building, 1111
Washington St SE, Habitat Program, Fifth floor. WDFW must receive your request within 30 days from the date you
receive notice of the decision. If you agree, and you applied for the HPA, resolution of the appeal may be facilitated
through an informal conference with the WDFW employee responsible for the decision and a supervisor. If a resolution
is not reached through the informal conference, or you are not the person who applied for the HPA, the HPA Appeals
Coordinator or designee will conduct an informal hearing and recommend a decision to the Director or designee. If you
are not satisfied with the results of the informal appeal, you may file a request for a formal appeal.
B. FORMAL APPEALS:WAC 220-110-350 is the rule describing how to request a formal appeal of WDFW actions taken
under Chapter 77.55 RCW. Please refer to that rule for complete formal appeal procedures. The following information
summarizes that rule.
A person who is aggrieved by the issuance, denial, conditioning, or modification of an HPA may request a formal appeal
of that action. You must send your request for a formal appeal to the clerk of the Pollution Control Hearings Boards and
serve a copy on WDFW within 30 days from the date you receive notice of the decision. You may serve WDFW by mail
to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,
Washington 98501-1091; e-mail to HPAapplications@dfw.wa.gov; fax to (360) 902-2946; or hand-delivery to the Natural
Resources Building, 1111 Washington St SE, Habitat Program, Fifth floor. The time period for requesting a formal appeal
is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal, you may request a
formal appeal within 30 days from the date you receive the Director's or designee's written decision in response to the
informal appeal.
C. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS: If there is no timely request for an appeal, the
WDFW action shall be final and unappealable.
Page 4 of 5
Washington Department of
Fish&Wildlife
� HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL PO Box 43234
- ;4',. .° ;>��-- Olympia,WA 98504-3234
'�H and{��L�
(360) 902-2200
Issued Date: December 03, 2014 Permit Number: 2014-4-391+01
Project End Date: December 02, 2019 FPA/Public Notice Number: N/A
Application ID: 1989
Habitat Biologist Larry.FisherQa dfw.wa.gov ��� for Director
Larry Fisher 425-313-5683 WDFW
Page 5 of 5
7. 3 NPDES Permit from the
Department of Ecology dated
February 19, 2015
..� 't;�:
�:�.
',t; r f�i<
i:�'��,
Si�1(E ()F WAtiHINGT()ti
UEF'AKTMENT OF ECULUGY
PU Boi �77600 •Olympia, WA 9850d-i 61/0 • 3bll--1117-hUflp
:l 1 %�,r 11',i.hin�lnn RelaY Servicr • Prnunc �s ilh a ,pei��h r/i�,ihilil y can c�r/!�t."-N i t-/�t-i l
February 19, 2015
Barbara Rodgers �
Quadrant Homes I
14725 SE 36`� Street, Suite 200
Bellevue,WA 98006-1606
RE: Coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit I�
Permit number: WAR302601
Site Name: Copperwood
Location: 4905 SE 2°d Place
Renton,WA County: King
Disturbed Acres: 9.9
Dear Ms. Rodgers:
The Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology)received your Notice of Intent for coverage
under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit(permit). This is your permit coverage
letter. Your permit coverage is effective on February 19,2015. Please retain this permit coverage
letter with your permit(enclosed), stormwater pollution prevention plan(SWPPP),and site log
book. These materials are the o�cial record of permit coverage for your site.
Please take time to read the entire pernut and contact Ecology if you have any questions.
Appeal Process
You have a right to appeal coverage u.nder the general permit to the Pollution Control Hearing Board
(PCHB)within 30 days of the date of receipt of this letter. This appeal is limited to the general
permit's applicability or non-applicability to a specific dischazger. The appeal process is governed
by chapter 43.21 B RCW and chapter 371-08 WAC. "Date of receipY' is defined in RCW
43.21 B.001(2).
��
NPDES Permit from the
Department of Ecology dated
February 19, 2015
�, -
. : :::
�"t::: .
iii'� f�. �:
���'.
"'i.
STATE OF WAtiHI�tiGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLUGY
PO Box�17600•Olympia. WA 9H50J-7600• .?50-�iQ7-bllq(1
i 11 for Washin,�t�►n Relay Servic•� • Persnn< <silh a cpeech disahility can ra/!N77-N33-63�1t
February 19, 2015
Barbara Rodgers
Quadrant Homes
14725 SE 36`�Street, Suite 200
Bellevue, WA 98006-1606
RE: Coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit
Permit number: WAR302601
Site Name: Copperwood
Location: 4905 SE 2"d Place
Renton,WA County: King
Disturbed Acres: 9.9
Dear Ms. Rodgers:
The Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology)received your Notice of Intent for coverage
under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit(permit). This is your permit coverage
letter. Your pernut coverage is effective on February 19,2015. Please retain this permit coverage
letter with yaur permit(enclosed), stormwater pollution prevention plan(SWPPP),and site log
book. These materials are the o�icial recflrd of permit coverage for your site.
Please take time to read the entire pernut and contact Ecology if you have any questions.
Appeal Process
You have a right to appeal coverage under the general permit to the Pollution Control Hearing Board
(PCHB)within 30 days of the date of receipt of this letter. This appeal is limited to the general
permit's applicability or non-applicability to a specific discharger. The appeal process is governed
by chapter 43.21 B RCW and chapter 371-08 WAC. "Date of receipt" is defined in RCW
43.21 B.001(2).
��.1
8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (CSWPP) ANALYSIS
AND DESIGN
A. Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan Analysis and Design
The erosion and sediment control plans were prepared in accordance with the 2009 King
County Surface Water Design Manual, 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the
KCSWDM, and standard industry practices throughout the construction process to limit
the amount of sediment traveling into the downstream systems. The permanent drainage
facility in Tract B will be constructed to provide sediment retention on site.
Additional BMPs that are proposed include a rock construction entrance located at the ',
intersections of Road A and S.E. 2nd Place, as well as Road C and S.E. 2nd Place, silt
fence where needed, straw mulch for the areas that reach final grade in the lot areas, V-
ditches with rock check dams, and hydroseeding. Clearing limits have been established
as shown on the engineering plans.
The following outline summarizes the basin area breakdowns for sediment pond sizing.
The developed 2-year peak flow rate from the Post Developed Basin from Section 4.0 of
this report was used for calculating the surface area required. The surface area was
calculated using the following equation:
SA= 2 x Q, = 2080 sf per cfs of inflow.
0.00096
Sediment Pond (Tract B permanent facilitv)
QZ = 1.77 cfs
SA Required = 3,682 sf
SA Provided = 12,723 sf(at elevation 377.00)
The sizing of the dewatering orifice can be determined as follows:
Ao= SA 2h o.s
0.6 x 3600 Tg 5
Ao= orifice area (sf�
SA= Pond Surface Area (s�
h = height of riser-4 ft
T= 24 hours
g = 32.2 ft1s2
Ao = 3,682 x(2x4)°5 = 0.035 ft2
0.6 x 3600 (24) (32.2)o.s
Diameter(D)= 24 x(Ao/n)°5= 2.53 in
B. Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Spill (SWPPS) Plan Design
A SWPPS plan will be provided as part of the NPDES Permit submittal at a later date. I
16834.015.doc
9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT
9.1 Bond Quantities
9.2 Facility Summary Form
9.3 Declaration of Covenant for Impervious Surface Limit
9.4 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities and
BMPS
16834.015.doc
�
�
�--+
�•-+
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
W
r
.
V�
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet S,5 Webdate: 02/2?J2013
� King County
Department of Permitting &Environmental Review
35030 SE Douglas Street, Suite 210
Snoqualmie, Washington 98065-9266 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600.
206-296-66Q0 TTY Relay 711
Project Name: Plat of Copperwood Date: 2/12/2015
�ocation: 143rd Avenue SE and SE 2nd Place Project No.: U14006283
Activity No.:
Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and
Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area
or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database.
yes no
If yes,
Forest Practice Permit Number:
(RCW 76.09)
Page 1 of 9
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
Version: 11/26/2008
Siie improvement bond quantiry worksheet.xls Report Date: 4/6/2015
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet S,5 Wabdate: 02/22/2013
Unit #of
Reference# Price Unit Gtuantity Applications Cost
EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL Number
Backfill&compaction-embankment ESC-1 $ 5.62 CY
Check dams,4"minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 Each 24 1 1620
Crushed surfacin 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03.9 3) $ 85.45 CY
Ditchin ESC-4 $ 8.08 CY
Excavation-bulk ESC-5 $ 1.50 CY
Fence,silt ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ 1.38 LF 2525 1 3485
Fence,Temporary(NGPE ESC-7 $ 1.38 LF 700 1 966
H droseeding ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.�1 $ 0.59 SY 38077 1 22465
Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.22 $ 1.45 SY
Mulch, b hand,straw,3"dee ESC-14 SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 2.01 SY
Mulch, b machine,straw,2"deep ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 0.53 SY
Pipin ,temporary, CPP, 6" ESC-12 $ 10.70 LF
Pi in ,temporary,CPP, 8" ESC-13 $ 16.10 LF
Pi in ,tem ora ,CPP, 12" ESC-14 $ 20.70 LF 70 1 1449
Plastic covering,6mm thick, sandbagged ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 $ 2.30 SY
Ri Ra , machine laced;slopes ESC-16 WSDOT 9-13.1(2) $ 39.08 CY
Rock Construction Entrance,50'x15'xi' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 1,464.34 Each
Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'xi' ESG18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 2,928.68 Each 1 1 2929
Sediment pond riser assembl ESG19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ 1,949.38 Each 1 1 1949
Sediment trap,5' hi h berm ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 17.91 LF
Sed.trap,5'high,riprapped spillway berm section ESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 68.54 LF
Seeding, b hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY
Soddin , 1"deep, level round ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.Q3 SY
Soddin , 1"deep,sloped round ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 7.45 SY
TESC Supervisor ESC-25 $ 74.75 HR
Water truck, dust control ESC-26 SWDM 5.4.7 $ 97.75 HR
WRITE-IN-ITEMS **** (see paqe 9)
Each
ESC SUBTOTAL: $ 34,863.23
30%CON71NGE1VCY&MOBILIZATION: $ 10,458.97
ESC TOTAL: $ 45,322.20
COLUMN: A
Page 2 of 9
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
Version: 11/26/2008
Site improvement bond quantity worksheet.xls Report Date� 4/6/2015
�
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Wcbdate 12l0?J2008
. .,., ..�.. _.. ,.. . _ . . , .�,. .�:
_ _ , _ . �.. .,
Exfsting Future Pubiic Private �uantlty Completed
Right-of-Way Right of Way improvements (Bond Reduction)•
&Dralna e Facilitles Quant.
Unit Price Unit Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Com lete Cost
GENERALITEMS No.
Backfill&Com action-embankment GI-1 $ 5.62 CY 5830 32,784.60 15760 88,57120
Backfill&Com action-tronch GI-2 $ 8.53 CY
CleadRemove Brush,b hand GI-3 $ 0.36 SY
Clearin Grubbin ree Removal GI-4 $ 8,876.16 Acre 1 8,876.16
Excavation-bulk GI-5 $ 1.50 CY 4000 6,000.00 10810 16,215.0�
Excavation-Trench GI-6 $ 4.06 CY
Fencin ,cedar,6'hi h GI-7 $ 18.55 LF
Fencin ,chaln link,vin I coated, 6'hf h GI-8 $ 13.44 LF 50 672.00 800 10,752.00
Fencin ,chaln Ifnk, ate,vin I coated, 2 GI-9 $ 1,271.81 Each 2 2,543.fi2
Fencin ,split rall,3'hi h GI-1 $ 12.12 LF 1400 16,968.00
Fill 8 compact-common barrow Gl-11 $ 22.57 CY
Fill&compact- ravel base GI-12 $ 25.48 CY
Fill&compact-screcned topsoit GI-13 $ 37.85 CY
Gabion, t2'dee ,stone fille�f inesh GI-14 $ 54.31 SY
Gabion, 18"deep,stone filled mesh GI-15 $ 74.85 SY
Gabion,36"deep,stone filled mesh GI-16 $ 132.48 SY
Gradin ,fine,b hand GI-17 $ 2.02 SY
Gradin ,fine,with rader GI-18 $ 0.95 SY
Monuments,3'lon GI-19 $ 135.13 Each 2 270.26 4 540.52
Sensitive Areas Si n GI-20 $ 2.88 Each 34 97.92
Soddin , 1"dee ,slo ed round GI-21 $ 7.46 SY
Surve in ,Ilne& rade GI-22 $ 788.26 Da
Surve in ,lot IocatioMines GI-23 $ 1,556.64 Acre
Traffic control crew 2 fla ers GI-24 $ 85.18 HR
Trail,4"chi ed wood GI-25 $ 7.59 SY
Trail,4°crushed cinder GI-26 $ 8.33 SY
Trail,4"top course GI-27 $ 8.19 SY
Wall,retainin ,concrete GI-28 $ 44.16 SF SO 3,532.80
Wall,rockery GI-29 $ 9.49 SF 180 1,708.20
Pagc 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL 4,475.06 52,600.74 132,436.48
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reductfon. Version: 11/2fi/OS
Slte improvement bond quantiry worksheet.xls Report Date:4/fi/2015
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Webdate: 12/02/2008
Existing Future Public Prtvate Bond Reductlon'
Right-of-way Right of Way Improvements
&Draina e Facilfties Quant.
Unit Price Unit Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Complete Cosi
ROADIMPROVEMENT Na
AC Grindin ,4'wide machine<1000sy RI-1 $ 28.00 SY 550 15,400.Q0
AC Grindin ,4'wide machine 1000-200 RI-2 $ 15.00 SY
AC Grindfn ,4'wide machine>2000s RI-3 $ 7.00 SY
AC Removal/DlsposaVRe sir RI-4 $ 67.50 SY 550 37,125.00
Barricade, e I RI-5 $ 30.03 LF
Barricade,t pe III(Permanent) RI-6 $ 45.05 LF
Curb 8 Gutter,rolled RI-7 $ 17.00 LF
Curb&Gutter,vertical RI-B $ 12.56 LF 650 8,125.00 2750 34,375.00
Curb and Gutter,demolitlon and dis osa RI-9 $ 18.06 LF
Curb,extruded asphalt RI-10 $ 5.50 LF
Curb,extruded concrete R1-11 $ 7.00 LF
Sawcut,asphalt,3"de th RI-12 $ 1.85 LF 1385 2,562.25 �
Sawcut,concrete, er 1"de th RI-13 $ 1.69 LF
Sealant,asphalt RI-14 $ 1.25 LF
Shoulder,AC, (see AC road unit price) RI-15 $ - SY
Shoulder, ravel,4°thick RI-16 $ 15.00 SY
Sidewalk,4"thick RI-17 $ 35.00 SY 360 12,600.00 1530 53,550.00
Sidewalk,4"thick,demolition and dis os RI-18 $ 29.5Q SY
Sidewalk,5"thick !il-19 $ 38.50 SY
Sidewatk,5"thick,demolition and dispos RI-20 $ 37.5Q SY
Si n,handica RI-21 $ 85.28 Each
Strl In , er stall RI-22 $ 5.82 Each
Stri in ,thermoplastic, for Crosswalk RI-23 $ 2.38 SF 72 171.36
Stnping,4"reflectorized line RI-2n $ 0.25 LF
Page 4 of 9 SUBTOTAL 75,983.61 87,925.00
Unit prices updated: 02/12/Q2
'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 11/26/08
Site improvement bond quantity worksheet.xls Heport Date:4/6/2015
� -
Web date: 12/02/2008
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet
' Existing Future Public Prlvate Bond Reductlon•
Rtght-of-way Right of Way Improvements
&Drainage Facilities Quant.
Unit Price Unit QuanL Cost Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Com tete Cost
ROAD SURFACING (4"Rock=2.5 base&1.5"top course) For'93 KCRS(6.5"Rock=5"base&1.5"top course) I,
For KCRS'93,(additional 2.5"base)add RS-1 $ 3.60 SY !
AC Overia ,1.5"AC RS-2 $ 1125 SY 460 5,175.00
AC Over►ay,2"AC RS-3 $ 15.00 SY
AC Road,2',4'rock, Flrst 2500 SY RS-4 $ 21.00 SY 970 20,370.00 2500 52,500.00 1200 25,200.00
AC Road,2",4"rock,Q .over 2500SY RS-5 $ 19.00 SY 1135 21,565.00
AC Road,3',4"rock,First 2500 SY RS-6 $ 23.30 SY
AC Road,3',4"rock,Qt .over 2500 SY RS-7 $ 21.00 SY
AC Road,5",First 2500 SY RS-8 $ 27.60 SY
AC Road,5',Q .Over 2500 SY RS-9 $ 25.00 SY
AC Road,6',First 2500 SY S-1 $ 33.10 SY
AC Road,6",Qty.Over 25U0 8Y S-11 $ 30.00 SY
As halt Treated Base,4"thick RS-1 $ 20.00 SY
Gravel Road,4"rock,First 2500 SY S-1 $ 15.00 SY
Gravel Road,4'rock,Q .over 2500 SY S-1 $ 8.50 5Y
PCC Road,5",no base,over 2500 SY RS-1 $ 27.00 SY
PCC Road, 6",no base,over 2500 SY RS-1 $ 25.50 SY
Thickened Edge RS-1 $ 8.60 LF
Page 5 of 9 SUBTOTAL 25,545.00 74,065.00 25,200.00
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
'KCC 27A authorizes only one band reduction. Version: 11/26/OS
Site improvement bond quantity worksheet.xls Report Date:4/6/2015
' � � �
WBtI(�d�d: �Z�2/2���
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet
Existing Future Public Private Bond Reduction'
Aight-of-way Right of Way Improvements
&Drainage Facilities Quant
Unit Price Unit Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Complete Cost
DRAINAGE (CPP=Corrugated Plastic Pipe,N12 or Equivalent) For Culvert prices, Average of 4'cover was aeaumed.Assume perforated PVC is same prfce as solid i e.-
Access Road, R/D D-1 $ 21.00 SY 290 6,090.00
Bollards-fixed D-2 $ 240.74 Each
Boliards-removable D-3 $ 452.34 Each
'(CBs Inciude frame and lid
CB T e i D-4 $ 1,257.64 Each 20 25,152.80
CB T e IL D-5 $ t,433.59 Each
CB T e II,48^diameter D-6 $ 2,033.57 Each 13 26,436.41
for additfonal depth over 4' D-7 $ 436.52 FT 25 10,913.00
CB T pe II,54"diameter D-8 $ 2,192.54 Each 3 6,577.62
for addit(onal de th over 4' D-9 $ 486.53 FT t 5 %,297.95
CB T e II,FO"dlameter D-10 $ 2,351.52 Each
tor additional depth over 4' D-11 $ 536.54 FT
CB T e II,72"diameter D-12 $ 3,212.64 Each
for additfonal de th over 4' D-7 3 $ 692.21 FT
Throu h-curb Inlet Framework(Add D-14 $ 366.09 Each
Cleanout, PVC,4" Q-15 $ 130.55 Each
Cleanout,PVC,6" D-i6 $ 174.90 Each 72 12,592.80
Cleanout,PVC,8" D-17 $ 224.19 Each
Culvert, PVC,4" D-18 $ 8.64 LF
Culvert, PVC,6" D-19 $ 12.60 LF
Culvert, PVC, 8" D-20 $ 13.33 LF
Culvert, PVC, 12" D-21 $ 21.77 LF
Culvert,CMP,8" D-22 $ 17.25 LF
Culvert,CMP, 12' D-23 $ 26.45 LF
Culvert,CMP, 15" D-24 $ 32.73 LF
Culvert,CMP, 18" D-25 $ 37.74 LF
Culvert,CMP,24" D-26 $ 53.33 LF
Culvert,CMP,30" D-27 $ 71.45 LF
CuNert,CMP,36" D-28 $ 112.1 i LF
Culvert,CMP,A8` D-29 $ 140.83 LF
Culvert,CMP,60' D-30 $ 235.45 LF
Culvert,CMP,72' D-31 $ 302.58 LF
Page 6 of 9 SUE3TOTAL 82,467.78 12,592.80
Unit prices updated: 02l12/02
'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 11/26/OS
Site improvement bond quan6ty worksheet.xls Report Date:4/6/2015
� t
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Webdate: 12/02l2008
Existing Future Public Private Bond Reduction*
Right-of-way Right of Way Improvements
DRAINAGE CONTINUED &Dra�nage FacUities Quant.
No. Unit Price Unit Quant Cost Quani. Cost Quant. Cost Complete Cost
Culvert,Concrete,8` D-32 $ 2t.02 LF
Culvert,Concrete,12" D-33 $ 30.05 LF
Culvcrt,Concrete,15" D-34 $ 37.34 LF
Culvert,Concrete,18" D-35 $ 44.51 LF
Culvert,Concrete,24" D-36 $ 61.07 LF
Culvert,Concrete,30" D-37 $ 104.18 LF
Culvert,Concrete,36" D-38 $ 137.63 LF
Culvert,Concrete,42" D-39 $ 158.42 LF
Culvert,Concrete,48" D-40 $ 175.94 LF
Culvert,CPP,6" D-41 $ 10.70 LF 19G� 20972
Culvert,CPP,8" D-42 $ 16.10 LF
Culvert.CPP, 12" D-43 $ 20.70 LF 1100 22770
Culvert,CPP, 15" p-44 $ 23.00 LF
Culvert,CPP, 18° D-45 $ 27.60 LF 5�0 13800
Culvert,CPP,24" D-46 $ 36.80 LF 390 14352
Culvert,CPP,30" D-47 $ 48.30 LF 460 22218
Culvert,CPP,36" D-48 $ 55.20 LF
Ditchin D-49 $ 8.08 CY
Flow Dispersal Trench 1,436 base+ D-50 $ 25.99 LF
French Drain (3'depth) D-51 $ 22.60 LF
Geotextile,laid in trench,pol ro lene D-52 $ 2.40 SY
Infiltration ond testin D-53 $ 74.75 HR
Mid-tank Access Riser,48"dia, 6'deep D-54 $ 1,6Q5.40 Each
Pond Overflow S illway D-55 $ 14.01 SY
RestrictodOil Separator,12" D-56 $ 1,045.19 Each
Restrictor/Oil Separator,15" D-57 $ 1,095.56 Each
Restrictor/Oil Separator,18" D-56 $ 1,146.16 Each 1 1146.1fi
Ripra ,placed D-59 $ 39.08 CY 30 1172.4
Tank End Reducer(36"dlameter) D-60 $ 1,000.50 Each
Trash Rack,12" D-61 $ 211.97 Each
Trash Rack,15" D-62 $ 237.27 Each
Trash Rack,18" D-63 $ 268.89 Each
Trash Rack,21° D-64 $ 306.84 Each
Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL 75458.56 20972
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduciion. Version: 11/26/08
Site improvement bond quantity worksheet.xls Report Date:4/6/2015
� , ,
Web date: 12/02I2008
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet
Exlsting Future Public Private Bond Reductiont
R(ght-of-way Right oE Way Improvements
&Drainage Facilities Quant.
Unit Price Unit Quant. Price Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Complete Cost
PARKING LOT SURFACING
No.
2°AC,2'top course rock 8�4"borrow PL-i $ 21.00 SY
2"AC, 1.5' to course&2.5'base cour PL-2 $ 28.00 SY
4"select borrow PL-3 � 4.55 SY
1.5"to course rock&2.5°base course PL-4 $ 11.41 SY
UTILITY PQLES &STREET LIGHTING Utiliry pole relocation costs must be accompanied by Franchise Utility's Cost Statement
Utility Pole(s)Relocation UP-1 Lum Sum
5treet Li ht Poles w/Luminaires UP-2 $ 9,500.00 Each 6 57U00 17 161,500.00
W RITE-IN-ITEMS
(Such as detention/water quality vaults.) No.
StormFllter Vault WI-1 $65,900.00 Each 1 65,900.00
WI-2 SY
WI-3 CY
WI-4 LF
WI-5 FT
wi-s
wi-�
wi-s
wi-s
wi-,o
SUBTOTAL 57,000.00 227,400.00
SUBTOTAL(SUM ALL PAGES): 163,003.67 599,917.08 191,20128
30%COIVTINGENCY&MOBIIJZATION: 48,901.10 179,375.12 57,360.38
GRANDTOTAL: 211,904.77 779,892.20 248,561.66
COLUMN: B C D E
Page 8 of 9
Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 71/26/08
Site improvement bond quanGty worksheetxls Report Dato:4/6/207 5
f ��
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet WQbdate: 1?JO?J2008
Original bond computat[ons prepared by:
Name: Barry Talkington Date: 2/12/2015
PE Registration Number: 41423 Tel.#: (425) 251-6222
�irm Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers
Address: 18215 72nd Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 Project No: U 14006283
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS&DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEk REQUIREMENTS
PERFORMANCE BOND" PUBLIC ROAD&DRAINAGE
AMOUNT BOND'AMOUNT MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND'
REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR
Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESG) (A} $ 45,322.2 TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY�"
Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (B} $ 211,904.8
Future Public Right of Way&Drainage Facilities (C) $ T/9,8922
Private Improvements (D) $ 248,561.7
Calculated Quantity Completed (E) $ _
Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration B�nd"/'* (A+B} $ 257,227.0
(First$7,500 of bond"shall be cash.)
Perforrnance Bond"Amount (A+B+C+D) - TOTAL (T) $ 1,285,680.8 T x 0.30 $ 385,704.3 OR
MlnimUm bond amount is .
Reduced Performance Bond*Total "" (T-E) $ 1,285,680.8
Use larger of x30%or(T-E
(B+C)x
Maintenance/Defect Bond"Total 0.25- $ 247,949.2
NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND"REDUCTION: Date:
*NOTE: The word"bond'as used In this document means a financial guarantee acceptable to King County,
"NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoratlon bonds io be combined when both are requlred.
The restoration requirement shall Include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum,not a maximum. In addition,corrective work,both on-and off-site needs to be included.
Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minlmum requlrements. For example,if a salmonid stream may be damaged,some estimated costs for restoration
needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30%contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity.
*"•NOTE: Per KCC 27A,total bond amounts remalning after reduction shall not be less than 30%of the original amount(T)or as revfsed by major design changes.
�
REQUIRED BOND'AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATI�N BY DDES
Page 9 of 9 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02
Check ouf ihe DDES Web sffe a! m�w kfng�oun aov/ ermits Version: 11/26/08
Site improvement bond quantiry worksheet.xls Report Date: 4/6/2015
�1
Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet
oi/iz/is
Original bond computations prepared by: Date: �5
Name: �a!'�Y T0.��..vLq� Tel#: K25 2$I -�ZZ Z
�
PE Registration NumbeIr: �{ ��{2�
Firm Name: �L�(`qV�G.ttSe„^ �0�14)��.w� ��4�y►ee1'S -<�C-.
Add�ess: �/s 7�1d �w�- s , [��M T , /.11� !��sZ Project#: (���0���3
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS&DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS
PERFORMANCE BOND* BOND*AMOUNT PUBLIC ROAD&DRAINAGE
AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND*
OR TEMP OCCUPANCY**#
Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control(ESC) (A) $ 4$,322•2J
Existing Right-of-Way Improvments (B) $ Z/l, 9�(.8�
Future Public Right-of-Way (C,) $ Sy2� 3�{�i •ZN
DrainageFacilities (C2) $ Z37� b93.�8
Private Improvements (D) $ Z��S`1.7c7
Calculated Quantity Completed
Total Right-of-Way and/or Site Restoration (A+B)$ 25�-, ZZ�
Bond*/••
Performance Bond*Amount(A+B+Cz)x1.5=Tota (T) $ 1`'�l,y bl.`-�� (B+C+Public Portion of C,,)x 0.2
Minimum bond•amount is$2,000
Maintenance/Defect Bond*Tota�
_ $ 198�2�9 .'io
NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND* REDUCTION: DATE:
'NOTE: The word"Bond"as used in this document means a financial guarantee acceptable to the City of Renton.
*'NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right-of-way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required.
The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum,not a maximum. In addition,corrective work,both on-and off-site
needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios,not just minimum requirements. For example,if a salmonid stream may be
damaged,some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount.
Required Bond*Amounts Are Subject io Review and Modifications by DDFS.
�GHA V� '
m� n� �Z ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE �I,
SANITARY SEWER & STREET LIGHTING I
_` BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET
� . �,!`t?' I�``Py� ���..
N�trWN
Project Name: Coppervuood Date of Estimate: 4/3115
Sfreet Location: SE 2nd PL and 142nd Ave SE BCE Job No.: 16834
Municipality: City of Renton No. of Lots: 47
Developer: Quadrant Homes
. . �
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
8"PVC Pi e sewer i e 72 LF $38.00 $2,736
48"Manhole/T e-1/Saddle Manhole 2 EA $9,600.00 $19,200
Street Li htin lConduiUJunction Box 23 EA $9,500.00 $218,500
� Subtotal $240 436
Total $240 436
� �' TA�
, PQ-�` oE W A S y '��
Q> ,`�, , y
�
� o
� Z
� � 14 3 �� ���
,
�ss� NA LT�E��'\�
04/03l2015
07/15/10 Page 1 of 2 �sa3a.o�a-eQws.�ns I
S
9.2 Facility Summary Form
�
KiNG COUNTY, �TJ.4SHINGTOT�, SURFACE WATER DESIGN 44ANtiAL
STORI�ZWATER FACILITY SUN�MARY SHEET DDES Pernut
Number
(provide one Stormwater Facility Summary Sheet per Natural Discharge Location)
�j Overvie�v:
Project Name
C o�� W��' Date � 1 t t � t S
' Do�vnstream Drainage Basins
Major Basin Name �� �;�'
Immediate Basin Name M,,���o&- Cncek '�[' ;b�r p3O3
' Flow Control:
Flow Control Facility Name/Number Co�voob2. ��3c�•�:'o� Pon6�.
Facility
, Location Tr�� 3
If none,
Flow control provided in regionaUshared facility (give
location) Y1��
No flow control required r J�, Exemption number
� 'n��.
General Facility Information:
Type/Number of detention facilities: T'ype/Number of infiltration facilities:
� ponds ponds
vaults tanks
tanks trenches
Control Structure Location
T(ti.�� '13 � �3 C�2 1Jork�, S;�.e. o� Qa�a'
Type of Control Structure 1��1 ���4'�ce. �-S��'c�� Nlunber of Orifices/Restrictions
2
Size of Orifice/Restriction: No. 1 �. �'a�� �
No. 2 3��''
No. 3
No. 4
Flow Control Performance Standard �tiou (,`�„�rr�1 `p�r•a��^ S�o.,���. M��c.4,t„a
t'Jf Glt� J'� ����i9nC�
2009 Surface��Vater Design Manual li4/2009
1
K[:VG COUNTY, 1�J�SHiNGTON, SURFACE �VATER DESIG�I MANUAL
Live Storage Valume t31� 12. � C. �• Depth �� Volume Factor of Safety
��G
Number of Acres Served q. $�A�C
Number of Lots 4�
Dam Safety Regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology)
Reservoir Volume above natural grade 4�,s t 3 C•��
Depth of Reservoir above natural grade �, F�t
Facility Summary Sheet Sketch
All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must inciude a detailed sketch.
(11"x 17" reduced size plan sheets may be used)
2009 Surface Water Design Manua) 1/9/2009
2
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE «'ATER DESIGN �4ANUAL
i Water Quality:
Type/Number of water quality facilitiesBMPs:
biafiltration swale sand filter(basic or large)
(regular/wet/or continuous inflow) sand filter, linear (basic or
, large}
combined detentionlwetpond sand filter vault{basic or
large)
{wetpond portion basic or large) sand bed depth (inches)
combined detention/wetvault stormwater wetland
filter strip ! storm filter
flow dispersion � 6�zL wetpond{basic or large)
farm management plan wetvault
landscape management plan t�o Is facility Lined?
oiUwater separator If so, what marker is used
above
(baffle or coalescing plate)
Liner?
catch basin inserts:
Manufacturer
pre-settling pond
pre-settling structure:
Manufacturer
high flow bypass structure (e.g., flow-splitter catch basin)
source contrals
Design Information
Water Quality design flow 2 . .�� CF$
Water Quality treated volume (sandfilter)
��Vater Quality storage volume («�etpool) � �I`�9 C. F.
Facili[y Summary Sheet Sketch
2009 Surface Water Design Manual ]i9/2009
3
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE ��t�ATER DESIGN \AANUAL
�
_ All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a detailed sketch.
{11"x17" reduced size plan sheets may be used)
20{l9 Surface Water Design Manual l;'9/2009
�
- - DRAINAGE FACILITY PLAN AND DETAILS I
o � Fofl
� 1'-20
co�p,�R wo��
J 6 �0 20 eo
f'1"N OF TFiE NWt/4, OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15 ���,�ATY�N=i6650
�" aam�ro ca.�i'��sra"`�ucnae TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M.
'J' CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNIY. STATE OF WASHINGTON
\.., ....`-\..-:... ..`. .
� � �2'm � ���r�te. ; ��.. `� �`•�''':� �
: �.t \\�'. •' ,r''�.
� 2a'Mi�E SfANG 7 LF 18�SD O C.SSR i ;�f�:� ' .'�. �+ ORDNU7'f HIGH
� �����T � 17;.F f8'SO d 0.555 �.. •;� � '`.�''.� H�TEN 4N7K IC:}7J.7i(187 SECppQApY TdET FEA -
� STD 7,.AM 5�ET 26 9�J. '��.'::+.\ `-'•- W/(dFR�P PAD PER C.O.R. SiD#Tkt?34.70
; '���\.�''�.,`�'. . SPC�S 41EES t5.
�5. f ` SEE 0.'TAL ON 4�EEf 16
� 20 LP'8'S(F.O 19.75% \'\,`� _..
C 'N5T.4L�?UNC �~ '•.�.'':,{'• -
?U
z W SKK�1 04 Ffr+CE �L \CA "_'+.,•.._'� JhILHOU>i ?.'E>�Ca7 E;Ev4�y1 S3t OJ
, E=364iA
O- VL't DETAIL �'�.� .
w d sf+[rr i�. � u�� �6. ,, '�rr�,�.\`•,'�._,'�•..r
E f �� � r SO o�� '�•���.r6^-.`'s1 � `
i O RON CONiRIX. - i r r..��k� � '' ,:•''�..�...,
c �. ��'+.��'•.`�. .
U STR1tC7LiE :NCY CYEt'iFLQ,y r i , .��:.
PEa oenv� �� sPuwar a�o�u� `r �\`•.,`.'•. � osnr��x
r�as s�r � -- - .nss s:�t � � C t_ �'...`•,`,�.,''•., 1:�38t.45 Ib�)
.i� 1 I y, ��1,' � �.'••.,`�.,''•.,�\ EIEDW RES�i 1C�.^.R
. ____ `'Y2 \` � i 1� .�\� � -�\'. .'•�._..,- OxR:E 0=3.G0"
. 'T �� �`�, � � Y ,-; �•' \
5 ;�� �.\ 37¢4_-__-�-^_�\ \,,__:......,':, W
;� � ----- a` `. .`�� _ _� � \\ � g
�` ' ,
20'M4E�SWfIG � �1 � i i. �� \��J��� ` . � \ f .•,'+'\._,� o¢ o0
.3gQ_r -__- `
WTE"PER NS�QT t t � t� r . ��� \� LNC=E9C�PNCR WSDOT� :t�Z._�� `'.'. .'����\ k.`�..`•':;_.., �
SRI Pldtl S'1�Ei[6 i � i � � Y
.. � i � �� i O , �`J � � � ` :7D PLAIG SHE:T I} j' \� �,� \`' .."� +8'RSER `�I �•
` 1 i l � t 1� � �� ` AL.0.4��CP OF Po10 ;� ``,`•..�'':.,�'�.,,.�\~`'-.�`.`.'• :• o� .
�``. t i � �` P � � \ . •�� '1.`y;:..•'•.+•..'+� _
'. } �� � ., . N
� � � 1 � � y `�� \�� `2 . 's\� . 13' lNLE7 1B' O'�TLET
30 Lf 18�SD 0 8321.. � � � , , `��'rv.� . �;\ B•` . 3 . . ♦ �''' ' \
` `�',•..,;_.. ::,.,y.•.
� � 'i i � ' � ` � •`� •� ��,`•:'.''•,'-. .
.�� , � � `. ,� '�+ ti••.`�.•.•.. tuav aEmacrwc
IE=37s.59(7B7 ii � :. � �} �1 i t �t ��' � �� .�` ` � . �'.,�..'••.•.•.., o
,�� ."� �'ti`:'•:'••.,;••. \
N�DE8R15 BEIXi��Ji � � � .� � ,`` ���� `�;\ �\`�� iRACT i1JE 'S .� �.'�*�..'`.�'�-.. . 8 �� • IE=377.06 �_ . r
, � t y �1� � � f � ��`` . �� `'\ . ..., Q Ic-_�7.A
� i i � � ` �` . f ` �. '..�' �.,�,-•.,`.., . �..\
y ' �. �` ` ` � �`6 ''•.\ �'�'' _`�-�.;;'•.ti'�.,:�
6 i 1 � � � � . , � `���\��� �� �. e TAACTA '�\ `:.\ ��'�'�'' •. \ q
IS J�,.• 1 1` ��`'�1. 1 � ,�� ♦ . ♦, `�`` �q7`` S i� o
�}"� �" 1 l 1 1 ♦ . � `\ ��'.1 �
.... � .- y ` � 4�t t1 . � � � �` ` . . '•.� 'i.5• ' ' ' ' ''� �� \` e
. � W 1� ��}- � i � ``�'!``�l\e�._��.r: v � �� , ��',' • . •... o
�+� � a. �5''•;`',_�'a.�`:.`-; i ' � ' l
� ; i � � � . .` ``\ .\ 5.�`:� ''t..` \''�•.'�.,'•''•.'+. �. '..
'1 i � 1, � i i `�`\`� -�•,... ��� ��STQrC{4�TER J,RFACE �°:� . \ � a' R.ESTRk",TrR?L,4TE
� � � � � • - �. � �` EL�377.00 1 �� .`..� � - �VffH S�KP CMLLED'JP.r�CE
� � ; � � 8 �'� . � � .
' � �I i � � �. ``�\�\ `��``� `��` .•�:` � tl . , � '-: � - 9. • '� �.��.. I"EL1371._G
- 1 I ' : . .
i ., j t � ' � `�. �� � i`�� ' ` � � {� ' . � ' , • \O 90TTOA1 OF SUHP ELc'=373 U7
-' i � � { ` � �� . • YA7(YMTEi 9JRFACE I �..t�.. I \.\F
.�� � i � � E9T'q1 OF. '`��```��` . ��` `� ��'� EL=S84.00 1 .�.�-1�. � '�_ .E 1'l iEGC/iQLZY 114EfJ 0.�3 SECTION V"EtY k-?,
i i �.`�;. ; IrETPON7 � . .- . '`. � .`` t ; ' 1 NOTii
2J2� 'w o i.rx �i , � � , , �v.=s�zm `.\`, �,; '; � � �1 ' � ] . t. i. a.��o c.ox so�em z>>.ao
- '. i � � - i i . �i � � i i . :I� � �. il Eft R41 B�RWER
�.: � � I `��� `'� ; �� �� i � _. j�.. � ; :, � r_ ,,.: , p�tv ��nEw �
, � f � , � ; � �: , � � �
� ' � ----- =--�-- ' � � � � � �' '' ;�€1 ` I ' �:!''`:; d � FLOW RESTAICTOR
�' , � , - - , � ; i , � i � roP�oF SZoaE � � :i �` � � ' C892 TYPE 2-54'
i . � i ----------- - 1!-_ _ ; F� ,r r . 1 � � � � I � •WdwDlw_I.OT ByV rrotE:
F-J7J.A0(307 � ____ _'___T�S__ _ ,/��: � � - ?;tr ,.�� " y: � TH6 FRO,7�tCT 6 USWG AE REDUCED IFPFItVqUS �,_�,
��.' __ .��..':I �� ;� Sll�'ACE CAf117�NEET THE NOfrDUAL LOT
N/DE9ES H4a2EN ��� � r•' i 6 fKDF BFRif EL= � ' � � r i �•., '. � - . ' ' 4 96P pEW�S1ENT5(S�EC�FDGLLY 7T1E A67A+GTEJ
N/RpRR�PAD RJt � � "�. � ' _'____�@__^__ 377.M ���y � � . � � .h e00iPR/JT�).iYMiCli 4EOI:IRES R_�OUCNC TFE
SPEtS S�EET �5. i � � _ � � � � c . � � I
� ��ri' � _ -------_-- i. � � � .. . AilQ11lA31E MfPERV'0'b GOF.RkGE EY 10 PEACEM.
f� •' _____�71 _.
_�___ - � i i !j� �� �.
1 . � ��' i�''�., - "---- 't ' i: i � i i _�o � � .�/. � 1W5 PROJECf i5 ZW&D R-t AHC 6 i15Nf 7NE ,�,�TALK�
1 ' � . CLUSTERMG PROVtS�OH NIFi31 THE COOE PER 4L
� . �,.. �I� i F + � i � --����--- --- r� �,� �i�'� �,i�'4� � . ..f _.-�I C.OR.CODE aU57ER�i�f'MS N TME R-4 20� 0�-�y5�Aghi'�l
i � . � ' ���'•. `� i { . � :� A�4E TO USE THE R-B 91k)f RfAUWE4ENT5. y
i i 1 � .t � � i �. i/'/ r` /- . . • �7,1�- `� � r R-B ZOIf ALLOYS 75t WtX�APERND'JS C�ER�GE � �o
S COlDfRl1C7�VO.� I � � ' '�$ � i `. ! , r'�.,!� i J� i � f ��� � � f±+ �y W7i LOT. �' � :
a 1 .� � �.�. ' I . ! 1 / � l. .' . %' �:::; : ;I
ACCESS R0�0:i75rIL.� 1 - ��'�:' - :
1-I/2'CRi6f£D i � ' � i ' i ',,a,.� BOD'bM OF i �`+.�f r i i ` . J � . r:"� St£DftAWGE FKIM wlS�EM 92ED � �`so ;�t��2] p ,��
SURFACWG TOP COURSE� F'' � � .. �;,c;_ h7�W i � 't i � . � I.. . f�`•.��.%I:`I � ..� �� FCit 65�YAX�PatV70J5 COJERACE PER L6f. '� !' rtSSLQ`.�.�'
:� � . �0.�370.W � �'•.J� i .j . ,:j. . �7.:,r�:��i�: : : : , � i � rs
' 2-I/]'CRU9f0 i ;� t � � �� !-. r � � r� r . � � �:'I �I ' ��� I Gr.�L!AY EL �flNA L i�'`
- suAr+��scsf i ; i � ' � S.. a , � � x i / �'-`' �'- � TRACT B POf�OATM � cE�eza=�sa so
/�
� G^�.'R� �Q ' i ; i � - �� ' �- -...�. �! ' ! - i•' % � r - ';.y,i;,.. j.� /. ccuae.eo b[tP(k��/t�E7ArtqH POND -
�. ' LE�fL 2 FLON COI�TR�
rS i � i � r � � .•i i i PEW SrOBIGE 4 / �:'.
� �' �� " 1CMW,A1 TOP OF PO4D Ei=386.00
¢ � 1 y � � �' - � �•-�� I i � E � ' 1'FE 2
� •�• ' 1 1 � I - _ � , I I I . Q=17/.� . `i�l J:�• � ± W
o I` .i'. i li , ' -' . .� /?' � �'�,/ '� / . ' ,t � �/�i�+r." . E�ME�GENCY a�"lPN SFLLIUY��38�65�� CB SEL'qN A-A z
, ,_- ''',;:.�' � :� �:� ��
� i � i � i i r � � ��. . �.'.-:•S`; ',`.� .• R4ER W£rRyH WAiE4 SU2ErCE R:384.15 �NC1y N7 SCALE �
i � � �i i `i i ,�I2-__•t_�� ' i I i i i � � � . .-.' ::'i,l,/�•`s I /r!.{`.`.-,i�. . DESICN WATER SJfiFAtE EL=SS�AO � NO SCALE O ��
• i. �.:
i I i �. � � ♦ - i`' � � � � � f,-','�;:J I'F.� . '� STATIi.WATER SU.4:A..^_EL=377.00
1:, '���` '� fr'��:',:'i'. . f= c N
- y 4 � . l �� � / / . � ' �: ��:' ��+r.i:�i�.i 6
, �. � � �'a7l-----�---� �` � . � �' ';�.i'i.•; ,:: � ' c�:(i sco�ucnr sra�xa3n.on no'es �,, x �
�':, i i �. : ':•:' -'�I �':' ' 'l����� rEL+I2 SEOiMEAT SfQ4AGc r1=37S.00 . FEEER TO C.O.R.SD Cf"W�%a.2� Z < �w
., 1 i: �
� ` �'+ , � � /'. ,'''' CELI/i BOTTON OP B'E7POND Q=370.0� �+-
�X_ � �; `.\��_�FIfl----- ��/� � ` •`�f:'r'i/ /.-':::... : . ;'�.:'�.�''�. �
- �,. r i r:'1!;`;•':: w n
� �� �_: _� � i i y��' / ' CELL 2 eOT70N OF WE7P(ItA 0.-S7Z�W �ZB >
_��.__'_' ' - � / / ' �•��. �`.: lr::'!!�:' � ¢MNCV
-- $T � i• • DETEAT�GN PaND W:IWE FE04YYitEC�110,677 Ci. O c�00 '
_ �r�' '� t
�. � .* . .: ;,;� : �;_;_-�.,..
� '�c:'.• i �� . .. ':-'� PONS VOLU4E GRWpED=131,12fi C.F. EI�I�IG�CY OVERFLOW SPIL.I_WAY o��m �� a
'�:'f':;.',:
'3@2'--'-"--" . i ..:f;I_ i� �_. . ���.�:����,: � .I . POMO N7LtL�E CONSSR�EO- CF. . Z I I ywj W
;�'��, (C
.t\``� �'.��:�? : :'f�I':' .'�l:':`: A NT 7 T NOT 70 SC.�Le ^Q� .� C
.i/:'�:�i fjr':'+;!�'r • �r o'1�[7
� `\ �-----�r----' �'/_� �`�`':�-' :� .:f,;'.� 7 1 7 3 0 _tv rt =� C
. - : , ;: :� PaidD BER�1 EA�IBANIGdENT NOTES � w �
`•�\__�_ ' . � ;�;/:'� `i:`. ':�:: .
� �as :''f':'i.:'.:�f',!;''. // �`:� . . 3�a u � i E 1 ...�..�..
� .-.--�_�� jr. :!i � /;f: !:;:':'�:'i', 1600t I 698 N Z N(��F -�� _
P i �:'. ' i'�� Y•i�:`;f';;.�:�. ,•: :'�i,'�, 177 a D010 3�Jt4 EMB11:K1��'TS WST BE CONSTRUCIEO ON fUfWE COMSOUDATED w w v� $
� 'J � . p� f;:;:'Il�'.��:':' SOIL �3R AD£OLNTELY CA1P/�[TE�AND STrBI£FU S.^.�45 NVIYZED 9Y A -- X��. c��
_ ;f�j:�;/ '?�:'':',:•.�: :e r;�' . . � t9 10 1 1 It 4 { �
¢ _',65,_�____ ' _ � +•/+. � i r i:''�i i:':'r.i i�=��` 1 1 1 G£07ECNN�GL ENCM7t)FREE Of LOOSE SURFACE SO'L WTEtg�lS.ROOTS. _
. ;/ � '-• .Y �� ios aHo on+trt oacu+x oceas. �,�
- - _ � �•;j;�,�.:'-''•:>>-:;:.
f . � � . � , ,� (�-r1 x,.
. /'°':',;�:.,',:;'�_;'.��.,��
:•: : , : � E%GVATE A KEY EOVAL FO SCE OF TNE�iY E►(&VMME!iT v 'rd�
'� i ?i: .' ':i . c:/,• �';'f:;'�'j;r:':;�.:,;.:':'
o:A,;•:� �,� _ '+tp> .'v'� .F�'�. :� f ! f i�=':`j i..: A
y'. .°�� - :�i '`::':�;:::,•� ��:`::;:.; . :'� VE?PObD YAUYE RQJRE'J=31.9�5 C.i. `� •./W ,9�
_ �`�'f��:�:` ' :MfTPONO NDLWE P1idlDED.38.9�9 C.�. Q70S5-gCTtONk H:i..if hVD NDT!L � \�r�� y
_ � �acm ro e�n�wrro�x�
' 'FiE BEftl!E1�9�KMFJ�?SFiALL 3E COASfr7JC'ED L�F SdL PtALEA IN 6-RJOi Q O
; A AF ' U T' t0�tW UFTS C01�ACTED TO Ai LEAST 95X OF WUaYtAI 7Ft'I DEMSIY,Nl7NN 2 �� .w
j 57 I 1 '� �NE{MODTASTIM D1�`�557,YAT11fN TFE�FOLICMh'G SaI�CT^aRAGTEF15TKSO'PROCT0.4 � = C-
7 Z2� �� Ap�p1U11 ;j ZOS S7LT AND CLAV.A YA%:YJ4 OF 60;L SRNU.A LN%SiUII OF � '�
- 37� 7♦ 8 'OI�D EtS SLT MD CUY,H7TN IqWNAL GRAYEL M1J C�BBI.E CCNTEYf. NOTG N J�
- VERTICAL DATUM CfiY OF REMOM �� � ' ,7c� C�kR�.IXGVATE?1 QACIAL Tlli!S NQL SUttED F�t BEFaI E1131NWENT b'� �y
an�R[nrxr,ruro a3 � i � i
wa�+u�. ``0
% PEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
� BENC�IARiC � �.�-.2r W,., DRAAVAGE FACI PLAN AND DETAILS »/oe/soi�
'"�"'"� CI TY OF ��pp�p��/�/��
j �OU`W V0.WY:V7 N CASE Mfqr�sl O�iF BJf �'� ��'N�� � � `rVr�G7��vvL �0"
� �«�►�,,��w�� �.` s REN TON �.
� s:-r o.cs a�a czv� """���� wie z e��:v�an r�� w,c I3o�is en � `` OUADAANT HOhAES ,�,. '
�� arc or r+crrtor+co►rtaa .,�o�er wre � F�sro�rnr r�.�r a�r , isJ�s an ,��--� on7vu P;onning/&n'Id�9/P�b6c Works Dept.
1a�2s�ssn-�sr.sutr� 200
_� �a�r r+o.<�a a�i.cic � ,`��, BELLEVUE, WA$8006 37 �
!.x1NE 2012) �By oAn `'b- REVlSON BY DA?E APi�t �*:
A - NNNNAA
,� DRAINAGE FACILITY SECTfONS AND DETAILS
° COPPER W�OD
W
J PTN OF THE NW1/4, OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 15
� TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M.
CITY OF RENTON, K{NG COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON
O � � � ____ _ _ _ - - _ _ .
� � _ � � _ : �: _:. � :-.:_ _. i _. - - . $ _ _ - _ -_ _ =_ - � ___
� .. . I .._.. I ._.. S "' "�'.' _. __ _..... ._ t-- .. "_ "' .. _. __ ' ' _-_ ---'
� w I __ . _._.. . ._. I".. ___ _ _ " _:.." '_'..__= 1 _ ..._ � _ _ - __ 3- _" : '__._ ' _ _' _ .._ _'_ -.__ ' --' _- - - _--.-
_.. _ _ I -- _ � I
__. �--- - : __ .__....�..____. __. . ...._i.._ �� ; - _ __!�, _.
_ _ EXhTiNG GRADE O�SECTIDN .
w na. �0 � �_ - ,_._ , _ , _ _ E ; ___ �_- _. _ , : __` � '�.- �o � -- - - -- -- -- - - - . �
o O ror ot ro�c��3as.00 ". _ ; _ i � _' ``l __:_ : __ _ - - --- __ __ _. _ .-_-- - `
_ - -
. _ ; 1;
I ;_ !
� _ ; , E -- - -- _ _ _ ..--- -
( i --
a V _ � i � I _ � ��� i I . :` _ i : -_ -- — - - - ----- : ' . . _
._ I .:.. _ i -. . . . � ... -i �'-�i' -. I i ._ � . .- �.._ : �". :�- .. �.. a --- E�UIG GR�1I1C 9__SESTqp - . - .. -- .— - -� -- ..._ _.� :.
385 _.. _ -- -- -- . _
-_�. ' -_-_1 �_ ''` .... i ._. _ ' A7ER S\IRFA��ELm38.1.�f � �� ._.. ._ ; -- ._ . 38J `�fl0 .._ __ '__ _..._ _. . _ . __ ____ .._ .I..� . . . `�
. .. ._ ,..- � ._ _ . ��� . _
�.: _... ..�� ' :_ . �I . . I '.'�.�JR''.. I �.... .; � " ._ -" ...__. i_ -- . �_�:_. . �. _ _ -_ ._ . :.�- iOP,Oc Pd0 El 386.00 - -- �: . . ... -. . .. ..
i , i � _ � i � _ --- _ . _
. 1 _ . . 1 :�� :: . .�i -_ � ' . ... .1 6 . _ - - � - -fl�JB@.00� - -
i , , � I � I { ; . . � :- _- -- - _ _
3eo -_ -- • ' - ' - - _ __ _
_._ ' ` � _ _
. ._... ..___ � 6
� K�37{50{I27. J ._ �I( � .__..�.... . ! __ ..._ ''� .'�$__- -. . c�CE NA� � RF . _. _. . . . ._ i-__ `'3�J
�.�- � _. __ _- M/CEBR6 BERR�R ..-.�. _�. I _.. � �..._�-.{_-6'1qiDE ffRY : i . -... . . i- ... � '.. . - _ _. . - - �- � - -
... { ��_. � .-_ - �j _._� -- �5'A'1C�T /A _ELa777.00„ -.- 1 _ -- .. I 1 d=m.ao_. ... . i . - paoaos[u�o s� xti ..� - � � -�---._ �_- _ : � __ .. --: �._ --�^ .�- -.__._:,
._ , :
j - - � �. ccu Iz.. � . � _-- -� I- te f�l I _ _ _ - - - _ _ --.-__
� ._
� ; __ _ _ v
_ �--_-
1 f
375 _ � �. _ -- i s` r � ' - --7 I j � -- %- - _ -_
_.:. -.
� i _ J # � � - -_ ... - -- --
__
- - ; :.�_ .. _ � ' - I - ". _� _ : _; - - _ - - __ _' -
i �p� �
E i
--- --- �-�-- --�i ... ... � � - - - _ .-- i �- �Ti . .-. _� . . ._ .. _ .. .. . MATpi�� - - _- ra.�_.-. .. . .. -- ------..___ _ . _ ..
�.
.._. ..__ ' ,.'. _ _ _ __ � .._. . ... .- �_. ..:. '___ '- _._."._ .; ._. -��:�Z,. __ _ . I . __i ��_ . ___._ . _._ . _ . _ -. . .-_-- . ._ ___' _ _ PRCPDSEDCRA�EOSEC710M��.
. __. _ _- . __. . __ .__. ....1 . -
. .--' --- ------ ... �_.._ .. '-SEDOIENt F1�37100-._. _ { ..._.-' ._-- _-. .._.. _ ... ..__..I' _ - - _. . . . . ,1.;. _. .. �_ . _ `. . ._. --- - -- - -.---- . - LL/2.. � -- . _._ ._ . . .. . . . . ...
� _ _I ; .. � .. .. � t ... .. , _ . ._' —'_— -_. __ -. . 4�.DEPD� ____ — '_ .
. ._.. _- 30�LF-�B- RO� . � PU3LIC .. _. .... ___ � . __. _� .__ � _._. .. L__. . _ ... . _...1 ..._._.. _.._. _._. . .'�� .�Jr� _ _ ""' —__.'-_-_ _- _ . _ __. . __... ____ . . . _..... .�7$
� �
_..- - -- t--- __r_ _ _ _ . _- - : --- _ i--- -- - -1 __ � - j _. . _ _ - -- -- -- - -- : - ' -- - _.._ _ _
�:� STAIt RCE F1�1�7.G6
_._._. ._-__ . .____ . _.._ _ _,_ . ._ . .,_-__c -!. _ �_____� .t --_-- Y�9EflINEHF�SfORAC,£_EL�17/.00-.- _-_.�__ .:..::_ .�.. __... . .__ "-- _ __ . __. _ ___v _ ' _ ___ _ .. .. ... ...
____. _. .__- .___ : . __ _ _ _-_ _ ___ __ ' _. .. . . ._...
_ _ _ _ _- _�_ __ .'_ _ ___ - _ _ t i
_ __ _ �:
, �
- - - -- --- - - - ---- =— ' i
� - --- -- --. __ _. -- -- -- '
.:.. .E J3Ub 9g71"_.::.. ._:..--- . . . :--� -�--- ------�- -�-- - .Y __ _i. .. ... . - :_. ".__r ._'.-_1 . _..._... ! .�.__ � :.._ .._ _...�. .. � --.: .----'�—80TTOIf OF CELL!2 Et.372.W- -�_. . ___ �__ .. . __�.::�. ' _-.:--.:.
... ._ - .. RIW36G50 -'_-..- .— .�- _- ' . .._. .. .__. ..._ —_�_—_'_3- .- _.- _-_I ___ . .._ 1 _._ ��..._. __._ _.- . '_- ._ —__ ___ . .. .___. ..,.. .. ._._.. _..... .
� � � -_ . . _ . __� ____ .__i . _. . . __ � .._ _.. -._ '_ _ '_ -_-_ . . . . 1'SEDINENF STORIGE EL 37l.00 ..-_�.. .-..
` ...�-_--_— ..—__.. �
� - -
. �_:..37709 �8'_� � ---- � ._--- --- --w`--- : —!'_--. - o4U��HC�C�UC -:� .. ".__ ..._.:.'_ __�_-...--- `'� `'�0 -_._ - __ --- ---- �,1 - :_- ----- '� EASnhY.C77ADE _-._.. _... 3n1
, . _- � =-��_E��1�F_n-L� --- - -- -ar�aoseo-'cA�o�E— ) -� _ -- -- - - B-8 -- - ° o s_cl�N . _ _
� _ __ �- -- - _ - - — - SECTIO -- - _--
1{ _ _ - --`---- — - - • - - "— - - _ - — — _
.. : . { ._ ._.. _ . :— . _ _ . �i .� -�T_���r3`- - -._-- . -_D SEGn01T� :- �_:� . _- ._ - - - - -- - — - . �� ruu.� r-�c!v vca,. ��-5 --- --..- .. PRCPO'9EyQiAF1E �:.. .__.:.�.�._�._
__ � . ___ ..__ .__r—. .- .__. _ .-. __ . _ _ _ __ _
. .. :�......' _T_-_'- -___J'__. , � j . .
�p � � _ � '_ � __ -"' "_' _ _ __r -'___ i -"_'_ "'... .. _ __- _" � � '___-- '___ _-_— _' _ .. .... ..�85
I o
i
ng �
n ro
�,�, 5{ �� '.+� � °�+{n �^n `�� � :4 ��n n °°• n '� :j 5�,� 51� m s� "�' ' m'
^n
1f00 2f00 3�00 4ifl0 }F00 2f00 3f00
� . 390
- --- --- . ;
__-- _ _ o ccrs�cE a sEcria+ '
_ _ _ ___ _ .
_ _ _ _. _ _....
- ---- -._. -_ -
_.. . . . ... _ . ._ .. ... . .. .... .. . . .. . . � ' i:�.'..
_.. --- - -�-- - _. .._
_
� . - Ai�_ - -- - __ cwsrwc a+�cE o sEcr�ax _ Q-�{i�ntk�frc
-_ .... -- - -. . _ .�:_ -. - .._- __ -::.. ..:_ ._ . . � 0P o� r";,. r
._ _ :.�. _ ..._ .�.. �.�:. . __ -._ _.
3�J -IB'�EP O�.321C Pl1HlC - � - _.- _- -- -��� .._- . .. _ ._ __ - _ RIPRAP PAD AER� �
Jc,G
_Z
, - :- - -— 4-- - - _ -- saEts_rHs s�r
' y�, . ._. .. - �'- - - �- — --- �------ �. .--- :nl a �7�23 0 ,`?
� �
� - - , -4 __ _ - - _ - — - y - tss`��sicp`` ..
. V .. . _ - _.' ._y_ ___ . . — ._- . __ _.: :._ -._... � :- . -- -. ._��ER NlJM�
x , TA A y -- -- _ __ _- - T �K PF'IO7EG7ION AT OUTFALLS
.. ; - - -- - - _ _ _ ; eocK iwi�+c:wrrui ��cu�anaas:
_ __ 'CM1AL Lt�,.
a
-Et-SnAO . .. . . _. . . ... ._--- �-- - .. . __.. . __ .._- . '- T-=�_�. _ �
c : _� . _ . . .. . .._ ' _._ _- . .. __ ___ y.. " f-� P,OCK lM11NG�1�41 BE OiYRR1'SP�lLS tNTH CRAiMT?ON�FOLLOA'S.
. ._._-_- -__.—.__ __._. .__ _. _ _ PA59hG 6-IN�i SQUIRE SIE�E: IODI �
a �5 ;., __ . , ____._ ___ __ -- -- '375 vasswc 3-iKa+sauut�sre� w-sos mamauu
_ _. . . -7-: -'.'
. . . �.,.. _ . .. ....... . . _.... .__._. .__� �__, P459NG 1�4-INCH SUTA�RE S�:E�E:0-IOS WJC4lAA j =�
_
.. � . . . .. ' _'_' _ -'
�, .. ; .. .. . . ... ... .. . . � -J. _ . ROCK LNIH:'NIMHUN C6ENS�QHS: � in
°' CBI TYPEYIJ4� ILJ('i � - . . . _ ._. ._ . . TNCNIESS: FOOi
,;{ . N: 17NI0.96 _ � -. w ��Q���l��� '_ -... . . ..: _ .__._ _-.- _..�-. :___ _ . i wIUTH: DVME�ER+ 6 FEEf w X °�a
,� � E 1}I�679.01 - � ; _ . . . . . . .. � . ._- . ._ . ... . LENGTH. 8�ET OR< X OIAME"ER. ¢ �•-
� .� ' . . . � £: 1S:t6 .a8 .. . - .- . . ._ .7S(18) - WH{Hf�EA t5 GREAIER w 4 �
IE�= 377.OU(19'N) .. . . . - - .. .. . _ _ __ _ ... N Z
� {... L���.�37).00�QB'SE} . . . : A9/�Jl7 57(18�.5) - - . - :. :._ ._ __. __ ___ . HEICHT. ..ROWN r 1 F00T
�E 777 370
r a O N 0� �� a
n � 17 li I8'CPEP O O.SSx(PU31JC � I:= 77 57(16'W) . - . �_ -..- .. . ' _ _. _.. _ _ ._.
Z�
,� '. _ . .. .._. . .. ._ ... ._. . _ �1PR.�P OlJTF0.l SPEC�1('Ai1QN5: �rn�O OD w w
� ��.. ... .. .5��¢LTS�V/1I�T . � = 37 57(18'E) . � ....... :^ .- ._:. ... . ___. ..�_ __ �. FePFiW SNall B£REASCdaPBLY 55ELL GR4DED WI7H C�AL�TICN��C*_�C��'S: ^Q.- .- i�
i � . ... � UAXMUM 5'CIE SIZE: 24 l7CHE5 fNpiNe.(,piAt1ETER 3 i!1� c3 2
� .. • . . - . :. .J:F B-SD.��'0.55.". -- _. . . _ .. _ _.. NEDWJ STONE 52E tb iHCHES �A N� W'r�
._ " ._ ..E: 1J1168�.<!. . . -. . .
� , Rw=sas.cu : OUTFALL TO STREAM. - - - �ueuuu srore� size, . inc"Es � �'�^n�
F [=17691 (ia'w) :M 2-,48' - -= Ewsnnc
� � . - _� E :37tE1 (iB�E) w�.�ll��A���� 3. . . _� ..D$ECTICN� RlPRIW MW:uUII�i/ENSIONS: �Y�� i�v=i
� � `=�O' -\'EPT. 1"= .
� ry^ac.
- v�cPosco_ niiacNess:z r�r
A: 17J9T2.98
$ --<.-_ . :�_Z LF.IB'.CPEP_0 OS5X(RJBIIC) - . ..-.. -_-: _� . ..� -__.: :.. _ .- .-_-�_. :�. .O SECTqN W16M DWtE7ER + 6 FEET OR 3%IXartETER.
. .� � E• 131�E�.91 � ,� NRi�NEVfR IS GRFATER ` ����
v E -a37 SO(78'N) lENG7M: t2 FEET OR< z OtWETER, V�A� sy�
- �r S � �i ,,, ,,, YrH�CHEYER 6 GREatER � M
� ,'� � $ �� � � ^ NEY�17: CRO'�'�N � i FJC�T � ,,;�I
J � rr i
� �_W
W � � _ = d
� H00 2f00 �pp 3}gp �b � �
- VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON b8 ��°"yJ r
/ oGN�.�f lMf'111I�� OEPARTMENT OF PUBLlC WORKS �. � n' C
m "°"��''-'"' � :- CI TY OF �A�NAGE FAqLffY SEC110NS AND OETAILS io/os/zo„ �
g ���n'w��,� ,�� �,� � ,��,: �•.s� .� RENTON COPPERWOOD � C
,� se o.bs•enar cw� '�'��' o,� z r�sm��an�vcx w.c �3o�,s arr �,e QUADRANT HOAI�S "`' .
,- an or an�rw+caaax i Re�sm�E»an n�w air �ns/is eer �� � u
�� vo+vr�a..�a a_a9�.o�s •'*"°,�°' a•*� a8" S,.fr�.r., �nruM Picnnng/Bui!d'wiq/P�Dpe wo�k9 o�e�- 14725 SE 36TH ST.SURE 200
�� c�u�c ro,z� ,,,,�,,,��. d„� rro. a�ws�o�v sr oa� aa� � BELLEWE,WA 98008 L
�"' 15 °`37
A - NNNNAA
OUTFALL AND 143RD ST IMPR�VEMENTS
° C�PPER WQOD
U
� � � PTN OF THE NW1/4, O�TNE SE1/4 OF SEC. 15
�'— � TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M.
p_�p� CfTY OF RENTON, KIfVG COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON
o s ,o ao
❑ - ' .,a.v..c 9
0 ,�\ �
O ` - �\"�. �� \ IC=3T3_75('B7
� ' \ �. �':� .
s � � 5�0� ��''\ \ �
; W ae�rP r�o a7t �' }���-�� '. \
� a �ECS SfiEE7 IS � t,:��'��\ \ .'`� QpR11P TO?OF
W a �6� . .� \ � , AOPE EL�S76.i5
O -��'y .:,�` . t` .� ,..\
...,
� i -•t _. �'b� ,� t\ � � ��a.. 3ffi
� U i � .. ,t .. .. .. _ ..__ .. .. ... . .... .. .
' a i ; .. t�C�` , ��� � � �_ `� GEO7Ek6!,E.Fl�BH'iC RA �_ .... _ .._.... ..... .... . . . ..__ _. .. . . .
� � R�PRnP TO 9E..PUCEO 350 � ..
�b•� � r� � �,�� q ���'� \� ` UP TO ORD�FUR1'.XrGN
i .... � r � 2 , _. \�... \ � WATER NA7lC `�
� � �� i, �i / � � . - _� � ..... .. . ...... .... . .... ......... .....
i
� r ; . �i ' 1 <<..- �� _ �. � -� �� 1' T�...
i i � �. �.:_ ( ����,� .�.'-..��,\ 71 \� -'. \ � 376 . . . - - . �
� , � • ,
i � l��i 4 ,� � ,r i <.5 . ' . � �., � � \ . 3T1 .. . . . ._._. .. � ' ��
i + < �s- L \ ' � -,, _
t C l � ` . :
1 . -�
� �, }� . � �'�` � � \= � sn -------- -----'
� � � c ;. � . �.��� � �. �� � — ..... P3'h".OE UYE(t OF GEOTE%iILE
`� � .� 1#��[ � .�� �,v-'1 � �\ �. .. . . � � iA3fiC(YM4FI FW 10}OR
� ` j Y \� \ BE Ulq ON STtBL�E7p � . ... . . . .. .._. .. .... .. . . . .... . EOJAI)BEL01Y R�RM
,��. ``� '__-' "' _--�. -�.\ �SUBCRt�O£A1 572�.50 � ORpNlRT ii{,+t y.. . .
�
____ __
, __'� \\� �\ �tt�w�t �..3�3.1s(sa�
,, ,......, w/oee�e�Q�e
_ � ._ ,�:: �.
�.s.�z'�arrua�a ` ----- ---" ''� ��� � '.�-p A�f�i0 ElEVAK1N�3 6.25 SECTtON A-A
-- -�- �-� _�•1 ' �� (r reovc P,aE cxax++) DETENTION POt�OUTFALL
' .\ .-' _ � � � .' sc.ee i._5.
•"� "'��,\�
. \ '
, O o io zo �o
N < _.
� �
� � ..-�J'�"++'r _ V:r4.' _ ' _
'��,�=� �- ��5;+:'""'� � .�- CDNT3ACT0R 70 VERFY LIHf'S
J�'J
WRN iNSHGC�OR OF GR��D
AND OVERIAY PR'OR TO
CDNSTRUCTqIt
� � 3 � � i
� � I
I--�._. . .. -^�.-- � --_ �,_9-�— ..-. �. ._._. . ,_,:"� - -- �--- __—a:. , v�r - - - '' --- .. .- — ----�. -- - ---- . � �----. . �-� ---- i Ex WERxFAD P^ttEa ,,yraLk�4
.�-: --�-- -- � �." ----� � ' .� -- .�, , � :: �P�l
. �., , � I - -- , :�.;%" � -x. C'�
- ,
i � � ---- ----
� � - ;- ----• �� _ - -
�— — '.-i..'' � �' � EX R/W y( •, ,:c - 12'�Sp P�' y
• _ — — — —
; — _
___"_' '- "' ' ' fP _ """_" _ ____"' �69 t — — . _ ' - _
, �
r •,
., -_'__"" -''__. '' '" "". ._'_ "-__'•'_" "
_1_ ' y
"__ _""'"" '" I"""" ' . 0
_'___ ' '` '...
,
.�
�
�
. " _____ _____"- ' � "__""" ' ' �
.,-
' ' i
_ �
.
.
'
' " '"' '_' """ ' _ __
'
�';��
. �
"' - ...:
``.
...-."Y'`
s� � ,
:
� _ 143F�AVE SE ^ ' '
, , :a�ov rto� - , _ ;' � �.vss,� ��
, --
, « , ; - - o _ — t, ej .,�� ,,_
�;;�,�� s
� m � -- ' - z- 'c��. t••t°
" ; —�- ---• " - --•.__ - - - -------- ----- ------ -- -
- ---------- ------- -�-----
x .....---•-------- ---------------------------------------- ----n------------ — ----
�1_ . EP '_ "" "' "'-�E} �•�_
s APPROIWfAT�1Y 174 LP � . .. — ..__�.... __ . . � "-"""' -_ _' � !�,�� `
, soun�or m•EasEcna+_ _
R WITFi 2hD PL SE -E - -- - - - - - Ex€OF R/W __ ` _ , ... . ....._.. � �"��t
_
;
� .
;- - ....-.... r
� — . . . � - - - - - - - - - -
_— , .............,-
� ° . r _..-- '' . . . , ....
:.............�..... .......... • .. . � � , .... ...... . � ,
........_. __: . .. -
, ............. . .. . . . . :..... ., . .
! ,,...�'� . _ ��
.., ...; .. � NMF STREET GRU70 AH6 - ? � •' �'''........._�`. . 1 � � O �
...- �� .... ,
_ ,:.: .............
.... .
-.._..
_ , .. .......
! . � DYERIAY KONG FRONfACE i �; j'' MAPE,EVOOOb CF�K 1��ARY 0303 --...... . . .., ..�BD....,,: y �w
.r � OF PROPERTY.I�N PAvEYENT "4 � '� . __^_ — . � � w x �
to unra ewsrac eeoww • , i ' i------- '.� - � � $z
� nT cEn�a a i��m�ve se ' . i _� .. '� �.:' 3
m E%fl/W AND E%--.STIKG EOGE Oi PAVEI�NT. ' �= / . .�� ..�-•-- � —T� \... . . 7 N .
<, s�3ra�w a9�.or . . � � _�— \., \.......... \ Q M N N W
� - —' l� � -
. . PIAT BO'JNDARY � .. , .' I r�' � �� , n pmi i~D W = C�
� p_
�� I . �: : . . . .
...
o � / .: j ;•'. / _�i� .�� .......- .... ..........._...., ..... '"�� \ �� �� N I 1 ��
o / . ' / .� i . . ..,\ \ �� � � ��\b ^a� � ��
� a � '_'_' / �. / � ::�/i�' l ... � ... "� \\ j �NN
� m � �� ��r,`�. ��;�-��. / . ..3'� . .. . . .�\ �\ '�, .\ ���� �� �
E I I '-3.� // .. P . 1 - . . . \\ \ � aD w N N T
� . / ''��. . } ... i ' . . .\ � . . ••..,:\ � - Y`•'� ��
m / . . /�� , / /�i� . . . � � � � � ' � . � . . �.\. \ � . .\ �
� Ez f5N BhRREF _` p��A,
S��,� y��/�� -s
CONf�iACTOR SIUt1 PROVOE 2 DAYS NOT�CE TO J �j�TI �"'i
143RD AVE SE HALF STREET OVERLAY ,��p�9D���hiING OYERUY pRFA PR�OR Q
v
� z
w
� katE-. t'=zo' ,` �
ub ,,
- VEHTICAL DATUM CiTY OF RENTOtd �'8 >`���J C '�
� GIY OC NEN'OM,MYD 88 pEPARTMENT OF PUBI.IC WORK3 � o-v L '�
� �NCHMARK �``- �-�s :°�,°°:v�p. ct CI TY OF OUiFALL AND�+�14p3pR�Dp ST IMPROVEM9YTS ,o�oe�soi. Q ',
� FWq6 Y3f:l4ENT H CASE �oi a�� &t VERT: M/A VVrrGIW� � C �I
CONC fAW,11[NT N , �.
� �'� �� yue ? GEWSED PER Citt REviEw a,� ,����5 �T ;� =� REN TON pUADftAiVT HOAAES , .�
SEf 0.65'EE:OW c�tnoE �
- pTy pF REM�ry�pMROL ���, �� t kC.95E➢PER CitY RMEW B1F I/15/15 8JT uc�t. � DATUM p��nning/Bvildinq�Public Works oeo�. 14725 SE 36TH ST.Sl�l'E 200 �
P�VT NQ 4)8 E1a391.0'fi I,
�_ (JUNE N�2) .wio�er oa� h'0. '�, REV'S�OY BY U4TE APPR &�� "'".c"`°•""�• � BELLEVUE� WA SBOOG �'� °�3'�C
A — NNNNAA
w DRAINAGE FACILITY DETAILS ,
o ��
° � ���n����` ����' COPPER WOOD ,
-W' � w� y r�,�« PTN OF THE NW1/4, OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15 f ' '`"""'""
� ,.,....,,a� m.m,. —�- ..�,�E^.�„ TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W. M. � ��,�' .p.�.-�..
�
�� ��w'^"""" CtTY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHfNGTON „L. �-''� � � �. �M�,W�
���d <�� '� �.^�^
O ��� I �,f� ��....,,...
� ��� ..
i
� -.._-... ,..�.._.�..�..,.,..,.
� _ xV __ ."_ Y!�iJ11l�6'�u�s•[Pt��.a»�uw�.C�P"KW lAM Nlv� ,��
W ��'_ /, M�
� I� � .�„�,.. �l
= a �..�,.�..a.. , ���;�.� ,�„�
� a : ��-.� -- � > a... �^�W
- p � � `tr;,,�
x � �- 1
''1 I L_' y w_� /
��t�rA�M.r�Mw�.a�4��u\ �•��`T�'+utr_swvns ^� / � %
3 r) / I
•�,e' . :� tr /�r`�j ;
' xita. .,.��d
t4oaM ` r,ou�Mc - av�a,Kqe
lwn.werO.wrti�. '--_r S f �
� sws��
Cwn��vn �tnlYws qjp t1oN/.-n
:��.1ua-� _ _L3�4:.W�SmrA= ��WHM araio _ cN��
""w+VPSY� � N'r�
��� YLTYL NeO�(d.�M�
KG1�011 C{
1bl�a
•.M6�6�actvt waec-4e er�-/�+b� �.(FwAFswti�bn r G'fzr�rfl irN4ir4Yr Q�+1�b�W V�15+�}�n
.�•n�a.«�..rrswm��ana� lY�I�rs�uwa+»r.Ys�bilv��+MMd�ktllh+wd�Yadv.
' U�w^a�0.�J��.iwwfvbb.LS>♦T�4. T►r.Le.��iva..eN�l4�r�tiY4Yr+l+lorw�.�Y.fANYma��bW.
1t wM��nV.riib�6iYW.l1�9s.a�}tib9+^�r+valvWr�G leM�l�w�vr3sv�
' DaM�IURM�aGaHb�OFarHe�rt LMOM�u��4�ww,aYdmC�y/aY.ars�FFnMrUOY�WLNIV�p
�w C�u nJ C.baV✓�smN�}sdv�d w6
u �o¢,.niava�l.de�.�ew.eur..�.+ln.d+s
]1 �+%4a��dMP^J1N.4nm+iJ�.�ka��d�F
1 NtuG:�ala�Le�.[�epvfNpclW�owtli+f4/�1�P'�wi�rY+�'J�OW�e
R��I�r P�
'�-` G';el.c�oR76 TYPICAI DETEHTIOH POND �.PUN-49S.I0 :
�y�--�� UEPA.4?VF.H7 3lCT7ONa IflHCF3 2COB i 31D.PW:-25420 �
Yl'ID�� �� Pn��i�� OVERFLOW S7RUCTUNB I WRCN 2008 �
C/�\/ ,,_ .� ., ,.\ —.�+e....
\� =- - __ _`�k .. �
f��� T
..,�.�.��
� Y _"_ ��r wa �w �p.�r�av.ra � I
.� '} i
�° St0lfl1Wat8r ••••••••••'�•••••••
, � .n.ta.a.a�..... "'�.`° Pond .»�:"-."'r'..��� � r
. � �....Ji � �.r ; ���� x.:
� , . i f��j ��
���. . ' ,........,,.,...s._,�e.�.. ���j'r.....�......�
ti�..w,�.. �
� � rn.rr �.r.�w�r..,�a ,� 41,� ,�tA1'Y/a
� � . � � ��.r.e m�o.c.aa....as.s. �' ,,5 fA,{A..'(G`
' Y ' �j a..�...r�'oi.�..�w�`,aa�r.�.. 0.� /���\j� �Lp2
, � y ; � W�w�hn4d��~ti�iva+�w�.01s �
i1 � � � ��.rcVc�.ryMWt.�.e.�eoV, .�
, ; . �� ��..�;�;:,�;Q..� � ,�`.,.u,�+�
. � .. z
_ ,. , �.�.���..�......�. sf ax�L 4u�:
K � t�= � � � �o.y.:.a�....d.w...a..�n �
...>�.,e..�...«,.�..
. �`-4-"� _ `� � ...�r....uo..Na..�re...a,.,+r SPEC�ICAT10PI5:
-'7 w.....�.�wr.w�......e�w.w..
� ..- --- � /J .�'+..".....r.r���..m.,.��•. Strs 4�I+desbT2lircMs
��� / kuer.ur�ur�r+a+ra�r I�Cflt Q�n�slJ�Y�VIfdlVll y
,.'� .- il�,� '.i,r�Mn�.w.r>...NHr.. Fxa: Kars�sctl+rNrryla3w�tsaMoa��i�spraye6} � ��
. . � . \ �. •`•.,aarcwr..�a..i.�rM.�.:m�n� LeUalnff Slkx�venramdMw'sV�atle.av3�lblbra. 0 �W
s�.'-.d. ' �'" � �aw Gdaa: 9�:Q�Wckyou�4 Ail MtMf. �/1 v�
� . . rKrroM.`rn�rvw
� • , - :�+..��.�:.,..,•.��+��.� ryoe r� r+e.wb�oo+a�.a.n�:a��ser��t�-tirx r.xt��on:owr eo.d� ,., �
n .....,_-..�.,�.�.,a....a.a,�.
,,,,��..�..eo.�......,.. ��nn���+�„�1•��dcre��)-:a�+�eoa�. _ � ��
,.A ��....�.>��....r�, � �
�e...,..ms-.w:• Poflw Pr�sw�paU4 berebd L;s.]'Ydi tq�o�tts��si�
verwo�.rs�aww.�tw,F+c�w v�t....�-�awavwn ��•�•••1e���„�.. Inalditiwe Searelodwinfnk!�nxAevaiabt�.OIMMieOYKt�IMO�'aPpes"a.R�fwn Q n N fV
�.w,.,. �rw
..,.y»�.,.:.�,.;'°...a,,... `�.' �r,;,o,. .. .°o�:w..�+:> .�.�. o-.aied mou-,tm amv a y.e�w tad,�ram�ae o so-�h mn�.nied p�nuec�s.c� m� m 5� �
��pmqb�rr,vY.CVv.��FC�YOVIM Dwuel6nt)�ry.,.�r�u�HMv a ��. C�
' ,,.,�,,.�....a.�,,,��,.,,,...,� m nYnu-�rta�Mr��ndh Ur bp sipn no NyMr Yien 11 Yxlws tmm qwM rxlace. Z Q�o 00 �� �
� ��.a��it.�i�.�.r...�.Iw~.�arna�sa�r�wu� ro+qyYw ' rv+rNNb•�..r�.nw.+r � C
� e.�..�..vr a �"w .�o„.... Plnr»nent Fece fl�M dlmdhn o1 D�Y�iadl or qrydd eccaa,Uo no161odc arry arcest roaA. [� �
� �ra�...�.r...�.o,..e.w ..e<r�...,..�.��..c�.nw.n.. .w'�'.:r.�i..v�wr x.w.�owaiw Dondplaw�rW'.6NVto�slnrfi�/fxlMealeg.mai�olaf.W�Moyt,P4o„�A n i u�v�
•.�.�.r..M..�na wA.*�.�i.on wavv�Pa�.....n � P
_ .. r�m�.a.�y��ew,.��q�wr ^ N N w�
E ,� .mwe.wa�++e�w. Nola!1 Uro laedYy Iw e Fer lo raspid InfJYdCloe�daW�me�ter,(ha hi&oM''nQ nde md 6s adJed b ~N+�'�
�_•••^••tl n,.r.eeaa,. �-rn4,�ecnar„rnedro �
��w Vva+�.i,.w.nn.��w �V+. A�V�P�Y•'An W�Tar�A�Cdk ONO w�� �
v �..muw.o.u�anvrnrinwuiat�cccaucuwm� ••'•�•a»w..a.... irdanatlmaldtld�aMwrnustbaedOaCrotlwWddCralp�:cpaalfioOMSbclba0.2<. � Y....._. c�
o ':,-.Jernies.a� '�•1°a
—��MfttGMRw MMOR�T[QF>�t1A[
0''.
9 ra�.a�.os�.a.a..rw auua sww5 wr�c�uuwm ���j��pb.�.�
E LAND3CArIN6.TREF�, y.�.p�_;,Sy.� A 1
� �PVBLC tORK3 9[7.P1J��-Y)C �(, `
� PON06�ON[TIIYAND � �i� FUEfIC rORNS PEI6NAN;TSURFACEPIATEt Q �;.; ,� o
m ����� FENCiNO STONOSRDS µcusT zOf2 �� �E'����► CONTROL 1'OND SIGN FfBAUARY 2010 'j Z �
� - W
j � V
_ �
_ � ~
- CITY OF RENTON be ,�°as�
�� i pEPARTMENT OF PVBIJC WORKS
� �" � w`�� � C I T Y O F ����FACILITY DEfAILS ,c/oa/zo u �
� ,�� �,� � ���� .w,,.,
COPPERWOOD
� 8 ��.r �.,� z r�u�a�c�n a�+w ww /� �s a�r `` REN TON p(�ADRANT HOAAES '
�
..$ ��. �� t �'�ts�o aER Cilv REVEr &rt i/i5 i5 8,17 � F .,�� OATUM Pbnn�ng/B��Id�nq/P�bl'ic Works Oept. �p.
�a�2s sE asni sr.s� 200
`�a N0. REVISfON ev onrE APPR � �� gELLEy�E,WA gg006 �n "�37 L
'.'v. ArPM��6Y DAE flli
A — N (�NNAA
DRAINAGE FACILITY DETAILS
o .a�...� �
° ��' � COPPE�TiVOOD
w �
� ---�—— - ---�---— —� -�=a�—'.��- PTN OF THE NW1/4,OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC.15
�'' _. ____ � � � T1NP. 23 N., RGE 5 EAST, W.M.
CRY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON
,.,�,..
.....�,.
�
p --- ——— — -----
O o
� ------- -o-- •------ -- ----- --a--- ----
W
Q � i KVoaua
= a ,�.,,.��.
wa
.�...�._,.,
0 0 �._...._....�.. � ,��,.,_„w�:,_
1 � q
°"""` STORMFlLTER DESIC;N TABLE
u
■.�s
t�i.wn rwu E auwrwor.s�.wNcro-v.s uu�aa.nru.n.w su Eau�fn �� �nrt c.��swc qruyp�Roa�aret muruort aaiwn vw�ra�rCw�GEcourtMo�ocu�rswnamsas�ccA�J�
a uns+uR��awuwanonwaatvto[n sGCantnanralE iEAI[mMEvwCEtwMor�o�eoF*raar�aro�v�toiNfLOIR �
iR�lF9MRE AOCO�Q -i�E iFMpKMO15ftlYiLl91f�WR�ME N�1Ef11MlEf IH YO1tl11011 AOR IILEf WMA�MTOM
s amwuRr�coroms¢ro+n�n*rom•oiw�IUMR��cVMwa�fwaar�Itux
-Nl vARTS NDYR6�Yl ASYiYI�PRVA�OlY COrtEd1YFSS 0�1EAXIS[MOB1
< <n�aocawcnunwwmw�ata+oawomnwro�rooracwawo�aua�acw�a�aa iwn�nr r T �rwo��eaa � ws wnowa�
.�s+�s�ow+enwewwwan � li srsr[uw*owu��cove�_
� ws.u�o+oe1rroonenwossnwreowoera�ais��o.rrawrmra��c� � urtar+s�l�l � aar aar tr1 I
a Ro.+ot��rt�aaa�ra.��[+wc9�1i61�ns1Nsrwswoun�wli. /=� /-� �=� /-� � ��u��rtn��MSwiICEMu 2 �i� =W' � xOr� 1p.Ir
C MT6LR�tYlOil�n9�00�MEY�ORCSW MOfiH1. _�1�t�r y�0_�� � � ���� IIS 111� �f 1l M i
a nna�c�anwuws�nownuaacs�cw � \ 7� 1C /C' /
• AIOrEGfa,QIVKMO�R1qMmfJ�iow�K�c�!/�l.I�a�iona��iiTMYR7l / !� !� !� !`� \ ' •
9EC�GtMl�q'frOM�t�'�RT.��)�IIRf(l10[Ml�Ol1�O�Oi�E/1RQ�C11�1 1 I I �_r���O�T����_\ � � '
� �� � r � i I S1TE SPEqFlC
b h- p_ li �-> �> �y-> �.a-,> �-� I -- DATAREQUIREMENTS
�j ARlOG1101 I C���y�e��� I�� 1� I ... -\ StnuCMiEC iM
I � � r %� 7\ 7 / v.rrn o�.:�wn riox w„[M au
n w
��-!> �l-�-� �-l-� 0� .Q- .
''.1 aWf�OwRwiEOd� iA
I �F"'��o'T 1^���—�' "'Y—� - . .: � nEMn cA�D Or aEM ROiM I MO
� sID.Tl�t—t7/A0 r r 1 �C �C �C� 7\ - � ';a w+mxcs�wacn ss
� PL'HIICTORlO FROr-T-/NSAR6�TtOETA1L / �-� !l�rf-! !� .� .. cu�rmoc[�_onw.*[ 1i
nEPAs'na�'r � �I �� r" � �f- i 1 � � Q Ca�KTECH �j �v�rn�ics�.Pw��e:vci css
�uacx sooe L it� �— � � I
1L=�r ��-�\'T=�--J n=e�nr� ic �,,,� or.c,m
�� - �.q=a `srr �r
- - - ��Q' �'� amer nr� ��a.� ves ir
QlIIFT M� � �llIM1P1 MY � � / IIFf MY iM EIFMl10M ii
� y� ���� IERMY BEVl1 �Il�
1!O MICAWAA]MlYWI IBlilf
4 �.~•�'"-�••••• p�qN FRAME AND COVER �o�w�ca�saena
=F �••••^r• (qME7Htv/�f0e5)
aiwEwo N.T.S
. � ewa�m�ora
/ ��.w eMp[�magiy
Y.Ye��a J (�1'�6 A �1a Nl pp{�y�¢SPHi1G1W
•�•r��+ mw�b.r�I RT[/IC11R1AGIiS9W1�EYFAtiR:FD.W.W�rE.9f1UNw'CTU�im.WWL0.0w.NDSHfaFINIP RI4K11�11
, DBMYMl1�1�lOEE.IL1614��0IXU[T1E9MLlKwiIFAST AYGOIp,
r,��
d�A ` �•� . � �E01CROwMTE9w1lESCAlYWVMY1.9Efi1CftMMTEpTE1Eti11/EOFTEROw1a9�EDp'M
� �. ��916/CEWMVCENFA13R�EA��ALUEIACRQVMTESNNLKtfiY40F1�1�OM�MVL
� +� ���_ ����������
T .rr ��e I ---�� s�+ �mvrzwruv�w��uw.sounuaesswhnonamnfc
i �z... �� a awaaerew�an���waaesea�os�un�cwao�+aanwrwxr.
( I a sat��onw«mc�s S�.►msm�cn++�ouvsosroweortt1aswgmn�crvawcartew
\ �.�. { :i..� �=�1 I � � � �y a sroaurthnw�TEnwwnswRwes,wleE�r�ccaeYccwlN�uecsWwiA�vowiwwnw�mnw�
R^�' .°'.�w� C� iJ.J � q y s.sna�icr��i�i�wwro�HsmLo,�wuw�nr�ic.ui�wwc�o s�ciwuawrunnn�now�r, ,,Q�y 1T�LK/
r� � ' � 'r"n�r�f'l�r�� d oaeeiav.r�aunFrnrci�ruei•�mK�ane�eornecamTownnuneTwae�a►wx�Taaewnprt �r �Y�s �C
` ��M { v usnwcs swrt ucer.v.+no uns wo ee usr rKn1 nE ca1.[oi�oca 0• �, y
I �I Y 1 9 II I � � ��o0
.ti...�..� , g € p �I I 1 1 1 I q A��wvA.eC�6�O6110F1�N/�6t1RN�M1FlOT�1q+PRON9W5ME9169EC7FY0E901COMM�MM11pO�Np Z
•�•••�••• �cwo�w F- . "- _ _ �� _ _ _ ( s�wi�srcaren n oia�a ar nctua '�
a corrn�craaror�aw�oEeane+r�xrwsu�riae�rusTr�cwonr�ww�mvrouF*�u�rnEnowia�n
L 1'� - - - _] s.aucnnc asnw au�o.s w�o-no� q�i�2s o �
�yo — �� � ������ — ccon�rn�crontorrt�u�a�naFN.wte[iw�ivaannswowssFJYuawcrurE � tp p� �,``�
X �+�ti, ounn� ��� "Y'r� e cow��ra rorr�iui vqn�ue��iesio�rw��c�wmm�oa�a ��iouw�'antm�wwvs. !�'t�OkAl14`��9
� RDW1R F.CAMfMGTORiOMBIO�Ei1ElIW1iH11QFCOY@MI1rt11T1!{liIB113li0YbROl1�E
� \�' �t�, �vnnori
� �
U ..w�.�r.u��.�w.�w� • � . • �y Z�
? z �„�,,,�,,,�r,^„ t� � y V�/�C� THE STORMWATER MNNAGEMENT STORMFlLTER O ��
> �.``.�.�,�... .... ......-.» sx-+-,:�� ���°�� 8'x 14'PEAK DIVERSION STORMFlITER � "
�`^ �w.-+..+...r '-��"..: ....� ��•„�-�„-� . - STANDARD DETAIL w �j
ar.wes.r+�e�.....w � / .eni.r.e - - - - � � �
�
a a r.w.v�ls.+�r..� {�Zj N � �7
4CYw�N.wJKAwti. � �€ r
ICF+M��YA�IiYr�1 ^Y�� a O fV� C
6���► �N I� s
o � �A�w�r�.�.r Z O��O aD �W
� m....�..r�e...r. ^ 3�n�n �
a w.�r.rwr:me�a•eras�wrr.eer.a ��1�'
T �r�.'�r'���+�vo�ou.�w....a.n�.�a.�. �r-�� �
E • ts�eW./4r�/�wuisue0�m�r+erMr N Z N N
Maw..r.m.r�.Yr.i.�r. �W�� J
� Y v v ��n
o � I �'8
9 g d
� d�
E
Q1D.PI�M-L77A0 Q
� �� pVB1JC itpR16 FLOW RESTRICTOR o
z
DFP1R[YFM OIL MLLUTION CONTIIOL Z -r
/ TEB ���� � _
l
- aTY oF FiENTON �'b8 ��o"SJ
� o��aATn.�nrr oF PUBuc waarca
' � "'�-w" �'�•�•" dl�1 C I T Y 0 F DRAINAGE FACIL(TY DETAL3 ,o�oe/io,.
' �� �'� °" �- �� �I�� RENTON �� �
o ,�,�R �. 2 ���*�. � i� �5 �T ;� �UADRANT HOME3
$ 1 REY15fD Ppt CIIY pEY[R Blf 1/15 IS &IT emo w� wNM �
� .R�« a,� ,,, «�;, a�o����/eu��,9/wwK waw oev�. 14725 SE 36TH 3T.SINfE 200
�m ,�...�.a.
y� �,� a„� ►a. a�s�a+ er nerE ,w�a � I�FI � Fvt1E, WA 98006
A — NNNNAA
9.3 Declaration of Covenant for
Impervious Surface Limit
To be completed and recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
This note will be removed prior
to recording.
��
, -_
--���"��:��J:�]�';-,,�
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
CITY OF RENTON
1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY
RENTON, WA 98057
DECLARATION OF COVENANT
FOR IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LIMIT
��r_ Quadrant
Grantee: City of Renton
Legal Descriprion:Lots 1 through 47 of the Plat of Copperwood as recorded in Volume_of Plats, pages
through_, inclusive, records of King County, Washington (Recording No. )
Additional Legal(s)on:
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 152305-9066-03, 152305-9067-02, 152305-9201-09. 152305-9093-00, 152305-9093-83,
152305-9100-01, 152305-9043-01, 152305-9221-05, 152305-9170-06
IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton construction pemut for
application file No. LUA/SWP 14-000550 relaring to real property legally described
above,the undersigned as Grantor(s),declares(declare)that the above described property is hereby
s
established as having a lunit to the amount of unpervious surface allo��ed on the property for tlie
purpose of limiting stormwater flows and is subject to the following restriction�.
The Grantor(s)hereby covenants(covenant) and agrees(agree) as foltows: no inore than
�
65% ��tsr�€eet of impervious surface coverage is allowed on the property. Impervious
surface means a hard surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as
under natural conditions before development;or that canses water to run off the surface in greater
quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include,but are n�t Iimited to,roof, walkways,patios,
driveways,parking lots, or storage areas,azeas that are paved, graveled or made of packed or oiled
earthen materials, or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of surface and storm
water. City of Renton or its municipal successors shall have a nonexclusive perpetual access easement on
the Property in order to ingress and egress over the Properiy for the sole purposes of inspecting and
monitoring the Property's impervious surface coverage.
This easemendrestriction is binding upon the Grantor{s}, its heirs, successors, and assigns unless
or until a new drainage or site plan is reviewed and approved by the Renton Development Services
Division or its successor.
�
IN WIT�TESS WHEREOF,this Declaration of Covenant is executed this day of
, 20
GItANTOR, o��ner of the Property
GItANTOR, o���ner af the Property
STATE OF �VASHI\GTOV )
COUNTY OF KING )ss.
On this day personally appeared before me:
,to me lrnown to be the individual(s}described in
and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as
their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated.
Given under my hand and official seai this day of ,20
Printed name
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My appointment expires
9 .4 Declaration of Covenant for
Inspection and Maintenance of
Stormwater Facilities and
BMPS
1
------__-------- -------
To be completed and recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
This note will be removed prior
Return Address: to recording.
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton,WA 98057
DECLARATION OF COVENANT FOR INSPECTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER FACILITIES AND BMPS
Grantor: Quadrant
Grantee:City of Renton
Legal Description:Lots 1 through 47 of the Plat of Copperwood as recorded in Volume of Plats,
pages through , inclusive, records of King County, Washington (Rec. No. )
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#:152305-9066-03. 152305-9067-02. 152305-9201-09. 152305-9093-00. 152305-9093-83,
152305-9100-01, 152305-9043-01, 152305-9221-05, 152305-9170-06
IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton Constuction permit
for application file No.LUAISWP 14-000550 relating to the real property("Property")
described above,the Grantor(s),the owner(s)in fee of that Property,hereby covenants(covenant)with the
City of Renton, a political subdivision of the state of Washington, that he/she(they)will observe,consent
to,and abide by the conditions and obligations set forth and described in Paragraphs 1 through 10 below
with regard to the Properly,and hereby grants(grant)an easement as described in Paragraphs 2 and 3.
Grantor(s)hereby grants(grant),covenants(covenant),and agrees(agree)as follows:
l. The Grantor(s}or his/her(their)successors in interest and assigns("Owners of the described
property")shall at their own cost,operate,maintain, and keep in good repair,the Property's stormwater
facilities and/or best management practices("BMPs") constructed as required in the approved
construction plans and specifications on file with the City of Renton and submitted to the
City of Renton for the review and approval of permit(s) U14006283 . The
property's stormwater facilities and/or best management practices("BMPs")aze shown and/or listed on
Exhibit A.The propeity's stormwater facilities and/or BMPs shall be maintained in compliance with the
operation and maintenance schedule included and attached herein as Exhibit B. Stormwater facilities
include pipes,swales,tanks,vaults,ponds,and other engineered structures designed to manage and/or
treat stormwater on the Property. Stormwater BMPs include dispersion and infiltration devices,native
vegetated azeas, permeable pavements,vegetated roofs,rainwater harvesring systems,reduced impervious
surface coverage, and other measures designed to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff on the
Propetty.
2. City of Renton shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions of the Property
necessary to perform inspections of the stormwater facilities and BMPs and conduct maintenance
activities specified in this Declaration of Covenant and in accordance with RMC 46-030.
3. If City of Renton determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to any of
the stormwater facilities or BMPs,City of Renton shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or
repair work required pursuant to RMC 4-6-030. The City shall also set a reasonable time in which such
Page 1 of 3 Fo�m Approved by City Attomey 10/2013
work is to be completed by the O�vners. If the above required maintenance or repair is noi completed
within the time set by the City,the City may perform the required maintenance or repair,and hereby is
given access to the Property,subject to the exclusion in Pazagraph 2 above, for such purposes. Written
notice will be sent to the Owners stating the City's intention to perform such work. This work will not
commence until at least seven(�days after such notice is mailed. If,within the sole discretion of the
City,there exists an imminent or present danger,the seven(7) day notice period will be waived and
maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately.
4. If at any tune the City of Renton reasonably deternunes that a stormwater facili�or BMP on
the Property creates any of the hazazdous conditions listed in RMC 4-4-460 G or relevant municipal
successor's codes as applicable and herein incorporated by reference,the Ciiy may take measures
specified therein.
5. The Owners shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance or repair work
completed by the City as described in Paragraph 3 or any measures taken by the City to address hazardous
conditions as described in Paragraph 4. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the City
within thirty(30}days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. 4verdue payments will
require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues,the
prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable litigarion costs and attorney's fees.
6, The Owners are hereby required to obtain written approval from City of Renton prior to
filling,piping,cutting,or removing vegetation(except in routine landscape maintenance) in open
vegetated stormwater facilities(such as swales,channels, ditches,ponds, etc.),or performing any
alterarions or modifications to the stormwater facilities and BMPs referenced in this Declaration of
Covenant.
7. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the pmvisions of this
Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery,or three(3) days after mailing by Certified Mait,
return receipt requested.
8. With regard to the matters addressed herein,this agreement consritutes the entire agreement
between the parties,and supersedes all prior discussions,negotiarions,and all agreements whatsoever
whether oral or written.
9. This Declaration of Covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real
property described above,and shall inure to the benefit of all the citizens of the City of Renton and its
successors and assigns. This Declaration af Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon
Grantor(s),and Grantor's(s') �uccessors in interest, and assigns.
10. This Declaration of Covenant may be terminated by execution of a written agreement by the
Owners and the City that is recorded by King County in its real property records.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Declaration of Covenant for the Inspection and Maintenance of
Stormwater Faciliries and BMI's is executed this day of , 20
GRANTOR, owner of the Properly
GRANTOR, owner of the Property
Page 2 of 3 Form Approved by City Attorney 10/2013
STATE OF WASHINGTON }
COUNTY OF KING }ss.
On this day personally appeared before me:
to me known to be the individual(s)described in
and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and aclrnowledged that they sig�ted the same as
their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated.
Given under my hand and official seal this day of ,20
Printed aame
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My appoinhnent expires
Page 3 of 3 Form Approved by City Attomey 10/2013
EXHIBIT A
Stormpipes and catchbasins in Tracts A, B, and C of the Plat o#Copperwood
Combined Detention/Wetpond in Tract 8 of the Plat of Copperwood
Contech StormFilter in Tract B of the Plat of Copperwood
,�
!_f
EXHIBIT B
The Copperwood project has a single combined detention/wetpond and a Contech StormFilter
vault located within Tract B of the proposed plat. Maintenance of these facilities shall be the
responsibility of the individual lot owners within the project development. The onsite
conveyance system consists of a series of catch basins and storm pipes which direct
stormwater to the drainage facilities within Tract B. Onsite Conveyance Systems within the
right of way will be inspected and maintained by the City of Renton. Onsite conveyance
systems within the drainage easements or tracts will be maintained by the property owners
through the Homeowners' Association created by the subdivision (with each property owner
having equal responsibility for maintenance). These conveyance elements include those
entering and exiting the tract from/to the public right-of-way. For conveyance pipes entering
the tract from right-of-way, responsibility begins at the last structure prior to entering the tract.
For conveyance pipes exiting the tract to right-of-way, responsibility ends at the next
downstream structure. The easement shall grant the City rights for inspection. Maintenance of
the above listed stormwater facilities shall be conducted on an annual basis. For more
information or to obtain a copy of the Maintenance Manual please reference Section 10.0 of the
Technical Information Report for the Plat of Copperwood on record with the City of Renton.
�._ � l
10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUA�
The Copperwood project has a single combined detention/wetpond and a Contech StormFilter
vault located within Tract B of the proposed piat. Maintenance of these facilities shall be the
responsibility of the individual lot owners within the project development. The onsite conveyance
system consists of a series of catch basins and storm pipes which direct stormwater to the
drainage facilities within Tract B. Onsite Conveyance Systems within the right of way will be
inspected and maintained by the City of Renton. Onsite conveyance systems within the drainage
easements or tracts will be maintained by the property owners through the Homeowners'
Association created by the subdivision (with each property owner having equal responsibility for
maintenance). These conveyance elements include those entering and exiting the tract from/to
the public right-of-way. For conveyance pipes entering the tract from right-of-way, responsibility
begins at the last structure prior to entering the tract. For conveyance pipes exiting the tract to
right-of-way, responsibility ends at the next downstream structure. The easement shall grant the
_ City rights for inspection. Maintenance of the above listed stormwater facilities shall be
conducted on an annual basis. Please refer to the maintenance requirements within this section.
_ ,
, I i
�� �
I
�
` i
, �
16834.015.doc
APPENDIX A f44AI'vTENA�tCE REQUIREI�4E�IT5 FLOW CONTROL,CO�IVEYANCE,A;�ID�VQ FACILITIES
NO. '1 - DETENTI4N PONDS
Maintenance Defecf or Probtem Conditions When Mainfenance!s 13eeded Results Expected When
Component Maintenance Es Performed
Site Trash and debris Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot Trash and debris c�eared from site.
per 1,040 square feet(this is about equal to the
amount of trash it would take to fifl up one
standard size office garbage can). In general,
there should be no visual evidence of dumping.
Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetaUon which may Noxious and nuisance vegefation
constitute a hazard to County personnet or the removed according to appiicable
public. regulations. No danger of noxious
vegeiation where County personnel
or the public might normally be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
potlution as oiE,gasofine,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regufations.
Source contro!BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No confaminants
present oiher than a surFace oil film.
Grass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcover mowed to a I
height. height no greater than 6 inches.
Top or Side Slopes Rodent holes Any evidence of rodent holes if facilily is acting Rodenfs removed or destroyed and
of Dam,Berm or as a dam or berm,or any evidence of water dam or berm repaired.
Embankment piping through dam or berm via rodent holes.
Tree growth Tree growth threatens integrity of slopes,does Trees do not hinder facility
not allow maintenance access,or interferes with performance or maintenance
maintenance activity. If trees are no#a#�reat or activi6es.
not interfering with access or maintenance,they
do not need to be removed,
Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause Slopes stabilized�sirtg appropriate
of damage is still present or where there is erosion conUol measures. If erosion
potential for continued erosion. Any erosion is axurring on compacted slope,a
observed on a compacted sfope. licensed avil engineer shou(d be
consulfed to resolve source of
erosion.
Setflement Any part of a dam,berm or embankment that has Top or side slope restored ta design
serited 4 inches lower than the design elevation. dimensions. If settlemenf is
significant,a licensed civil engineer
should be consulted to determine
the cause of the settlement
Storage Area Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 10%of the Sediment cleaned out to designed
accurnulation designed pond depth, pond shape and depth;pond
reseeded if necessary to control
erosion.
Liner damagec! �iner is visible or pond does not hold water as Liner repaired or replaced.
(!f Applicable) designed.
lnletlOutlet Pipe. Sediment Sediment filling 20°to or more of the pipe. InleUoutlet pipes clear of sediment.
accumulaBon
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inleUoudet No trash or debris in pipes.
pipes{includes floatables and non-ftoatables).
Damaged Cracks wider than'/rinch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y,-in�wide at
inleUouUet pipes or any evidence of soif entering the joint ot the inleUoutlet pipe.
at the joints of the inleUouElet pipes.
Emergency Tree growth Tree growth impedes flow or threatens stability of Trees removed.
OverFlow/Spillway spillway.
Rock missing Only one 3ayer of rock exists above native soil in Spiilway rastored to design
area five square feet or larger or any exposure oi standards.
native soil on the spill�vay.
1/9/20o9 2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A
p_�
APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOVV CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,AND tNQ FACILITIES
NO.4-CONTROL STRUCTUREIFlOW RESTRICTOR
Maintenance Defec#or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance Is Per#ormed
Structure Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than'/:cubic faot vrhich fVo Trash or debris blocking or
is located immediately in front of the structure potentially blocking entrance to
opening or is blocking capacity of the structure by structure.
more than 10%.
Trash or debris in the structure that exceeds'13 No trash or debris in the structure.
the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the
lowest pipe into or out of the basin.
Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition presenf which would
�oluma. atfract or support the breeding of
insects or rodents.
Sediment Sediment exceeds 60°Jo of the depth from the Sump of strucfure contains no
bottom of fhe structure to the invert of the lowest sediment.
pipe into or out o#the slruc#ure or the bottom of
fhe FROP-T section or is within 6 inches of the
invert of the lowest pipe info or out of fhe
strvcture or the bottom of the FRQP-T section.
Damage to frame Corner of frame extends more than'/.incn past Frame is even with curb.
andlor top slab curb face into the street(if applicable).
Top slab has hales larger than 2 square inches or Top slab is free of holes and cracks.
cracks wide�than'/,inch.
Frama not sitting flusfi on top slab,i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab.
separation of more than 3/,inch of the frame from
the top slab.
Cracks in wails or Cracks wider than Y:inch and longer than 3 feet, Structure is sealed and sfructurally
bottom any evidence of soil particles entering structure sound.
through cracks,or maintenance person judges
that structure is unsound.
Cracks wider than Yx inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more fhan'/a inch wide at
at the joint of any inleUoutlet pipe or any evidence the joint of infeUoutlet pipe.
of soil particles entering structure through cracks.
Settlement/ Structure has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design
misalignmenf rotated more fhan 2 inches out of atignment. standards.
Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than%:-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wida at
inletloutlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of inleVoutlet pipes.
the structure at the joint of the inleVouHet pipes.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and dlsposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminanfs
present other than a surfaca oil film.
Ladder rungs missing Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design standards and
or unsafe misalignment,rust,cracks,or sharp edges. allows maintenance person safe
access.
FROP-T Section Damage T section is not securely aftached to structure T section securely attached to walf
wall and outlet pipe structure should support at and outlet pipe.
least 1,000 Ibs of up or down pressure.
Siructure is not in upright position(allow up to S#ructure in correct position.
10°!o from plumb).
Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight or Connections to ouBet pipe are wafer
show signs of deteriorated grout. tight;structure repaired or replaced
and works as designed.
Any hotes—ofher than designed holes—in the Sfructure has no holes other than
structure. designed holes.
Cleanout Gate Damaged or missing Cleanouf gafe is missing. Replace cleanout gate.
?�fl9 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1!9/2009
A-7
APPENDIX A MAINTENAl�CE REQUIREMENTS FLO��V CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,AtvD WQ FACILiTIES
NO.4-CONTROL STRUCTUREIFLOW RESTRICTOR
Maintenance Defect o�Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results ExpecEed When
, Component Maintenance is Performed
Cleanout gata is not watertight. Gate is watertight and worlcs as
designed.
Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gafe moves up and down easily and
maintenance person. is watertight.
Chain/rad leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is in place and works as
designed.
Orifice Ptate Damaged or missing Control device is not working properly due to Plate is in place and works as
missing,out of place,or Bent orifice plafe. designed.
Obstructions Any trash,debris,sediment,or vegetation Plate is free of all obstructions and
blocking ihe plate. works as designed.
Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking{or having the Pipe'ss free of all obsfructions and
potential of blocking}the overfiow pipe. works as designed.
Deformed or damaged Lip of overflow pipe is bent or deformed. Overflow pipe does not allow
lip overflow at an elevation lower than
design
Inief/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filiing 209�0 or more of the pipe. InleUouttet pipes clear of sediment.
accumulation
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inleVoutlet IVo trash or debris in pipes.
pipes{includes fioatables and non-floatables}.
Damaged Cracks wider than Y�-�nch at the joint of the No cracks more than%.-inch wide at
inleUouBet pipes or any evidence of sail entering the joint of the intetloutlet pipe.
at the joints of the inleUoutlet pipes.
Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening tvider than'!P inch. Grate opening meets design
(If Applfcablaj standards.
Trash and debris Trash and debris tha#is blocking more than 2Q% Grate free of trash and debris.
of grate surface. footnote to guidelines for disposal
Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s)o#the grate. Grate is in place and meets design
standards.
Manhole CoverlLid Cover/lid not in place Co�edlid is missing or only paRlally in place. Covedlid protects opening to
My open structure requires urgent structure.
maintenance.
Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper toals.
Not Worlcing maintenance person with proper tools.Bolts
cannot be seated. Self-locking coverllid does not
work.
Covedlid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Covertlid can be removed and
Remove coverllid after applying 84 Ibs.of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance
person.
1/9/2pp9 2009 Surface Vdater Design Manual—Appendix A
A-8
APPENDiX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMEVTS FOR FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,Ai�1D VJQ FACfLITIES
NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES
Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Ezpected When
Component Maintenance is Performed
Structure Sediment Sediment exceeds 60%of the depth from the 5ump of catch basin contains no
bottom of the catch basin to the invert of the sediment.
fowest pipe fnto or out of the catch basin or is
within 6 incftes of the invert of the lowest pipe
into or out of the catch basin.
Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than'/:cubic foot which No Trash or debris blocking or
is located immediately in front of the catch basin pofendally blocking enVance to
opening or is blocking capacity of the catch basin catch basin.
by more than 10%.
Trash or debris in the catch basin that exceeds No trash or debris in the catch basin.
'/3 the depfh from the bottom of basin to invert the
lowest pipe info or out of the basin.
Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation
odors that could cause complaints or dangerous present within catch basin.
gases(e.g.,methane).
Depasits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition present which would
volume. attract or support the breeding of
insects or rodents.
Damage to frame Comer of frame extends more than'/.inch past Frame ls even with curb.
andlor top slab curb face info the sL�eet{If applicable).
Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Inches or Top slab is free of holes and cracks.
cracks wider than Y.inch.
Frame not sitting ftush on top slab,i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab.
separation of more than%.inch of the frame from
the top slab.
Cracks in waI(s or Cracks wider than Y�inch and longer than 3 feet, Catch basin is sealed and
bottom any evidence of soif particles entering catch structuralty sound.
basin through cracks,or malntenance person
judges that catch basin is unsound.
Cracks wider than'/z inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than�/,inch wide at
at the joint of any infeVoutlet pipe or any evidence the joint of inleUoutlet pipe.
of soil partides entering catch basin through
cracks.
SetUemenV Catch basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin repEaced or repaired to design
misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. standards.
Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than Yzinch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at
inleUoutiet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of inleUoutlet pipes.
the catch basin at the joint of tt�e inlet/outlet
pipes.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollutlon such Materials removed and disposed o#
pollutlon as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paini. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. �fo contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
1nIeU0utlet Pipe Sediment Sediment flling 20�0 or more of the pipe. InleUoutlet pipes clear of sediment.
accumulation
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inleVoutlet No trash or debris in pipes.
pipes(indudes floatables and non-floatables}.
Damaged Cracks wider than%:-inch at ifie joint of tMe No cracks more than'/.-inch wide at
infet/outlef pipes or any evidence of soil entering the Joint of the inleUoutlet pipe.
at thejoints of tfie inleUoutlet pipes.
2009 Surface Water Desigt�?Vlanual—Appendix A 1/4.-2009
A-9
APPENDIX .4 MAINTENANCE REQL"IREMENTS FLOW CONTROL,COIVVEYANCE,A1�D WQ FACILITIES
NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES ��,
Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When I
Component Maintenance is Performed
Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than'!g inch. Grate opening meets design
(Catch Basins) sfandards.
Trash and debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grate free of trash and debris.
of grate surface. footnote to guidelines for disposal
Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s)of the grafe. Grate is in place and meets design
My open structure requires urgent standards.
ma3ntenance.
Manhole Cover/Lid Co�er/lid�ot in place Cover(lid is missing or only partially in place. Cover/lid protects opening to
Any open structure requires urgent structure.
maintenance.
Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be openad by one Mechanism opens with proper tools.
Not Working maintenance person with proper tools.Botts
cannot be seated. Self-locking covedlid dces not
work.
Covediid d�cult to One maintenance person cannat remove CoveNlid can be removed and
Remove coveNlid after applying 80 Ibs.of I'rft. reinstalied by one maintenance
person.
,_ }
�
!�'91?009 2009 Surface VVater Design�Vfanual—Appendix A
A-10
APPE�IDI�A MAINTENANCE REQUIREA�9ENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL,COI�VEYANCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
NO. 6-CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When ',
Component Maintenance is Performed i
Pipes Sediment 8 debris Accumulafed sediment or debris that exceeds Water flows freely through pipes. '
accumulation 20°/a of the diameter of the pipe.
VegetaboNroots Vegetation/roots that reduce free movement of Water flows freely through pipes.
water through pipes.
Contaminants and Any evidence of conlaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
potlution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to appiicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a sutface oil film.
Damage to proteclive Protective coating is damaged;rust or corrosion Pipe repaired or replaced.
coating or corrosion is weakening the structural integrity of any part of
pipe.
pamaged Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced.
pipe by more than 20%or is detennined to have
weakened structural fntegrity of the pipe.
Ditches Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic toot per 1,000 Trash and debris cleared from
square feet of ditch and slopes. ditches.
Sediment Accumutated sediment that exceeds 20%of the Ditch cleanedlflushed of all sediment
accumulation design depth. and debris so that it matches design.
Nozious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Idoxious and nuisance vegetation
constifute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to app)icable
public. reguladons. No danger of noxious
vegetation where County personnel
or the public might nortnally be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concxete sturries or paint. according to appiicable regula6ons.
Source controf BAAPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surtace oil film.
Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water Water flows freely through ditches.
through ditches.
Erosion damage to Any erosion observed on a ditch slope. Slopes are not eroding.
slopes
Rock lining out of One layer or less of rock exists above nabve soii Replace rocks to design standards.
place or missing(If area 5 square feet or more,any exposed nadve
Applicable) soil.
I
� I�I
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1 r9:20(l9
A-11
APPENDIX A 'vtAII�TENANCE REQUIREMEI�TS FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,AND\�1Q FACILITIES ,
NO. 7- DEBRIS BARRIERS (E.G., TRASH RACKS) '
Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Matntenance is Needed Results Expected VYhen
Component �Aaintenance is Performed.
Site Trash and debris Trash or debris plugging more than 20%of the Barrier dear to receive capacity flow.
area of the barrier.
Sediment Sediment accumulation of greater than 20%of Barrier clear to receive capacity flow.
accumulation the area of the barrier
Structure Cracked broken or Structure which bars attached to is damaged- Structure bartier attached to is
loose pipe is loose or cracked or concrete structure is sound.
cracked,broken of loose.
Bars Bar spacing Bar spacing exceeds 6 inches. Bars have at most 6 inche spadng.
Damaged or missing Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 inches. Bars in place vrith no bends more
bars than'/.inch. II
8ars are missing or entire barrier missing. Bars in place according to design. 'I
Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% Repair or replace barrier to design �
deterioration to any part of barrier. standards. '
1;9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design ti4anual—Appendix A
� A-12
APPEtiDIX A A4AINTENANCE REQUIRE\4EI�TS FLOW CONTROL,COtitiEYA�CL,AND 1VQ FACILI7"1ES I,
NO. 9- FENCING I
Maintenance Defect o�Problem Conditions When Maintenance is IVeeded Resulfs Expected When
Component Mafntenance is PerFormed
Site Erosion or holes Erosion or holes more than 4 inches high and 12- No access under the fence.
under fence 18 inches wide permitting access through an
opening under a fence.
Wood Posts, Boards Missing or damaged Missing or broken boards,posY out of plumb by No gaps on fence due to missing or
and Cross Members parts more than 6 inches or cross members broken broken boards,post plumb to within
1'/:inches,cross members sound.
Weakened by rotting Any part showing structural deterioration due to All parts of fence are structuralfy
or insects rotting or insect damage sound.
Damaged or failed Concrete or metal attachments deteriorated or Post foundation capable of !
post foundation unable to support posts. supporting posts even in strong I
wind. I
Metal Posts,Rai(s Damaged parts Post out of plumb more than 6 inches. Posf pfumb to within 1'/:inches. II
and Fabric '
Top rails bent more than 6 inches. Top rail free of bends greater than
1 inch.
Any part of fence(including post,top rails,and Fence is aligned and meets design
fabric)more than 1 foot out of design alignment. standards.
Missing or loose fension wire. Tension wire in place and holding
fabric.
Deteriorated paint or Part or parts that have a rusting or scafing Structurally adequate posts or parts
protective coating condition that has affected siructural adequacy. with a unHorm protective coating.
Openings in fabric Openings in fabric are such that an 8-inch Fabric mesh openings within 50°10 of
diameter ball could frt through. grid size.
�
1/9;2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A
A-14
APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLO�V COi�TROL,CONVEYANCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
N0. 10-GATES/BOLLARDSIACCESS BARRIERS
• Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance is Pertortned
Chain Link Fencing Damaged or missing Missing gate. Gates in place.
Gate members
Broken or missing hinges such that gate cannot Hinges intact and lubed.Gate is
be easily opened and ciosed by a maintenance working freely.
person.
Gate is out of plumb more than 6 inches and Gate is aligned and vertical.
more than 1 foot out of design alignment.
Missing s#retcher bar,stretche�bands,and ties. Stretcher bar,bands,and Nes in
place.
Locking mechanism Locking device missing,no-functioning or does Locking mechanism prevents
does not lock gate not link to all parts. opening of gate.
Openings in fabric Openings in fabric are such that an 8-inch Fabric mesh openings within 50%of
diameter ball could fit through. grid size.
Bar Gate Damaged or missing Cross bar does not swing open or closed,is Cross bar swings fully open and
cross bar missing or is bent to where it does not prevent closed and prevents vehicle access.
vehicle access.
Locking mechanism Locking device missing,no-functioning or does Locking mechanism prevents
does not lock gate not link to all parts. opening of gate.
Support post Support post does not hold cross bar up. Cross bar held up preventing vehicie ,
damaged access into facility.
�
Boliards Damaged or missing Ballard broken,missing,does not fit into support No access for motorized�ehicles to ;
hole or hinge broken or missing. get into facility.
does not lock Locking assembly or lock missing or cannot be tJo access far motor+zed vehicles to j
aftached to lock bollard in pface. get fnEo facility.
Boulders Oislodged Baulders not located to prevent motorized vehicle No access for motorized vehicles to �
access. get info facility. {
Circumvented Motorized vehicles going around or between No access for motorized vehicles to I
boufders. get into facility. �
2009 Surface��'ater Desigit'�fanuat—Appendix A I r'9i2009
A-1�
APPENDtX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREA4ENTS FLOR'CO:VTROL,CONVEYANCE,AND VVQ FACILITIES
N0. 11 -GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING)
AAaintenance Defect or Probtem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Gomponent Mafn#enance is Performed
Site Trash or litter Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from sife.
per 1,000 square feet(this is about equal to the
amount of trash it wouid take io fil!up one
standard size offce garbage can). In generai,
there should be no visual evidence of dumping.
Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation
cons6tute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to appfica6le
public. regulations. No danger of noxious
vegetation where Counry personnel
or the pubiic might normaily be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of con#aminants or polluBon such hAaterials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concrete sturries or paint. accarding to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. fVo contaminants
present oiher than a surface oil film.
Grasslgroundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcove�mowed ta a
height. height no greater than 6 inches.
Trees and Shrubs Hazard Any tree or limb of a tree idsntified as having a No hazard trees in facili#y.
pofential to fali and cause property damage or
threaten human life. A hazard tree identified 6y
a qualif(ed arbortst musE be removed as soon
as possibte.
Damaged Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are sp{it o� Trees and shrubs with less than 5°!0
broken which affect more than 25°�of the to#al of totaf foliage with split or braken
foliage of the tree or shrub. limbs.
Trees or shrubs that have bee�blown down or No blown do�vn vegetation or
knocked over. knocked over vegetation. 7rees or
shrubs free of injury.
Trees or shrubs which are not adequately Tree or shrub in place and
supported ar are leaning over,causing exposure adequately supported;dead or
of the roots. diseased trees removed.
1/9/20U9 2009 Surface Water Design ylanual—Appendix A
A-I 6
APPENDIX A 1�4AINTENANCE REQUIRE�IENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCE,A:�ID WQ FACILITIES
N0. 12-ACCESS ROADS
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditian When Maintenance(s Needed Results Expected When ,
Component Maintenance is Performed I
Site Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 Roadway drivable by maintenance
square feet(i.e.,trash and debns would fill up vehlGes.
one standards size garbage cart).
Debris vrhich could damage vehicle tires or Roadway drivabie by maintenance
prohibit use of road. vehicles.
Contaminants and My evidence of contaminants or polfution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oil,gasoline,concreta slurries or paint. according to applicable regufations.
Source controi BMPs implemenfed if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oif film.
Blodced roadway Any o6struction which reduces clearance above Roadway overhead ciear to 14 feet
road surface to less than 14 feet. high. I
Any obstruction restricting the access to a 10-to At least 12-foot of width on access '
12 foot width for a distance of more than 12 feet road.
or any point restricting access to less than a 10
foot width.
Road Surtace Erosion,settlement, Any surface defect which hinders or prevents Road drivable by maintenance
potholss,soft spots, maintenance access. vehicles.
ruts
Vegetation on road Trees or other vegetation prevent access to Maintenance vehicles can access
surface facility by maintenance vehicles. facility.
Shoulders and Erosion Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more than 8 Shoulder free of erosion and
Ditches inches wide and 6 inches deep. mafching the surrounding road.
Weeds and brush Weeds and brust►exceed 18 inches in height or Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches in
hinder maintenance access. height or cleared in such a way as to
allow maintenance access.
Modular Grid Contaminan#s and Any evidence of contaminanfs or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
Pavement pollution as oil,gasoline,ooncrete slurries or paint. according to applicable reguia6ons.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
Damaged or missing Access surface compacted because of broken on Access road sur#ace restored so
missing modufar block. road infiftrates.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1/9i?009
I A-17
� .APPENDIX:'� A1AIT�TET�AI�CE RFQUIRE�IENTS FOR FI.OW COi�TROL,CONVEYA\CE,AND\'4'Q FACILITIES
N0. 16-WETPOND
Maintenance Defect or Problem Cond(tlon When Mafntenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance Is Performed
- Site Trash and debris Any trash and debris accumulated on the Wetpond site free of any trash or
wetpond site. debris.
Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may IJoxious and nuisance vegetation
constitute a hazard fo County personnel or the removed according to applicable
public. regulations. No danger of noxious
vegetation where County personnel
or the public might normally be.
Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of
poliution as oil,gasoline,concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil film.
Grass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcover mowed to a
height. height no greater than 6 inches.
Side Slopes of dam, Rodent holes Any evidence of rodent holes if facility is acfing Rodents removed or destroyed and
Berm,intemal berm as a dam or berm,or any evidence of water dam or berm repaired.
or Embankment piping through dam or berm via rodent holes.
Tree growth Tree growfh threatens integrity of dams,berms or Trees do not hinder facility
slopes,does not allow maintenance access,or performance or maintenance
interferes with maintenance activity. If trees are activitles.
not a threat to dam,berm or embankment
integrrty,are not interfering with access or
maintenance or leaves do not cause a plugging
problem they do not need to be removed.
_ Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause Slopes stabilized using appropriate
of damage is still present or where there is erosion control measures. If erosion
potential for continued eroslon. Any erosion is occurring on compacted slope,a
observed on a compacted slope. licensed civil engineer should be
consulted to resolve source of
erosion.
Top or Side Slopes Settlement Any part of a dam,berm or embankment that has Top or side sfope restored to design
of Dam,Berm, settfed 4 inches lower than the design eleva8on. dimensions. If settlement is
intemal berm or significant,a licensed clvil engineer
Embankment should be consulted to determine
the cause of the settlement.
Irregular surface on Top of berm not un'rform and level. Top of berm graded to design
internal berm elevation.
Pond Areas Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 10°Ja of the Sediment cleaned out to designed
_ accumulation(except designed pond depth. pond shape and depth.
first wetpool celf)
Sediment Sediment accumulatfons in pond boriom that Sediment storage contains no
accumulation(first exceeds tiie depth of sediment storage{1 foot) sediment.
wetpool cell) p(us 6 Inches.
� Liner damaged(lf Llner is visible or pond does not hold water as Liner repaired or replaced.
Applicab(e) designed.
Water level(first First cell empty,doesn't hold water. Water retained in first cell for most of
wetpool cell) the year.
Algae mats(first Algae mats develop over more than 10%of the Algae mats removed(usually in the
wetpool ce(I) water surface should be removed. late summer before Fall rains,
especialiy in Sensilive Lake
Protection Areas.)
Gravity Drain Inoperable valve Valve wilE not open and close. Valve opens and closes normalty.
Valve won't seal Valve does not seal completely. Valve completely seals closed.
Emergency Overflow Tree grovvth Tree growth impedes flow or threafens stability of Trees removed.
Spillway spillway.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual—Appendix A 1/9/2009
A-21
APPC-NDIX A MAIVTENANCE REQL'IRE�IENTS FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYAT�lCE,AND WQ FACILITIES
N0. 16-WETPOND I
Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditfon When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When
Component Maintenance Is Performed
Rock missing OnEy ona layer of rock exists above native soil in Spillway restored to design
area five square feet or larger,or any exposure of standards.
native soil at the top of out flow path of spillway.
Ri�rap on inside slopes need not be replaced. I
InIeVOutlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20%a or more of the pipe. InfeUoutlet pipes dear of sediment. I!
accumulation '
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulafed in inleUoudet t�o trash or debris in pipes. '
pipes(includes floatables and non-floatables).
Damaged Cracks wider than'/:-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at
inletloutlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the�oint of the inletloutlet pipe.
at the joints of the inleUoutlet pipes.
r
I,`912�09 2009 Surface Water Design Manual-Appendix A
A-22
�, APPENDIX A MAINTENAI`CE REQL'IREMENTS FLOW CONTROL,CONVEYANCG,AND WQ FACILITIES
� NO. 21 -STORMFILTER(CARTRIdGE TYPE)
Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results E�cpected When '
r Component Maintenance is Performed �
1 : '
Site Trash and debris Any trash or debris which impairs the function of Trash and debris removed from '
the facility. facility.
Confaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pol(ution such Materials removed and disposed of
pollution as oils,gasoline,concsete slurries or paint. according to agplicable regulations.
Source control BMPs implemented if
appropriate. No contaminants
present other than a surface oil fifm.
L'rfe cycle System has not been inspected for three years. Facility is re-inspected and any
needed maintenance performed_
Vault Treatment Sedimenl on vault Greater than 2 inches of sediment. Vau1t is free of sediment.
Area ftoor
Sediment on top of Greater than'/�inch of sediment. Vauft is free of sediment.
cartridges
Nlultiple scum lines Thick or multiple scum lines above top of Cause of pfugging corrected,
above top of cartridges. Probabiy due io piugged canisters or canisters replaced if necessary.
cartridges underdrain manifold.
Vauft Structure Damage io wall, Cracks wider than'/�-inch and any evidence of Vault replaced or repaired to design
Frame,Bottom,andlor soil partides entering the structure through the spec�cations.
Top Slab cracics,or qualified inspection personnel
determines the vault is not structurally sound.
Baffles damaged Baffles corroding,cracking warping,and(or Repair or replace baffles to
showing signs of faifure as determined by specification.
maintenanceCnspection person.
Fifter Media Standing water ln 9 inches or greater of static water in the vault for No standing water in vauR 24 hours
vault more than 24 hours foliowing a rain event and/or after a rain event.
overfto�v occurs frequently. Probably due fo
" plugged fi{ter medla,underdrain or outlet pipe.
Short circuiting Flows do not properly enter filter cartridges_ Flows go through filter media.
Underdrains and SedimenUdebris Underdrains or clean-outs paRially plugged or Underdrains and clean-0uts fres ot
Clean-Outs filted�vith sediment and/or debris. sediment and debris.
lnleUOutlet Pipe 5ediment Sediment filling 20%or more of the pipe. InleUoutlei pipes clear of sediment.
accumulation
Trash and debris Trash and debris accumufated in infet/outlet No trash or debris in pipes.
pipes(includes floatables and non-ftoatables).
Damaged Cracks wider than'/2-inch at fhe joint of the No cradcs more than Y.-inch wide at
__ inleUoutfet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inleUouUet pipe.
at the joints of the inlet/oudet pipes.
Access Manhole Coverllid not in place Cover/lid is missing or only partially in place. Manhole access covered.
Any open manhole requires immediate
maintenance.
Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools.
not working maintenance person with proper toofs.Bot#s
cannot be seated. Self-locicing coverllid does not
work.
CoverRid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Coverllid can be removed and
remove cover/lid after applying 80 Ibs of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance
person.
Ladder rungs unsafe Mlssing rungs,misalignment,rust,or cracks. Ladder meets design standards.
Allows maintenance person safe
axess.
Large access Damaged or difficuft Large access doors or plates cannof be Rep(ace or repair access door so if
doorslplate to open opened/removed using normal equipmenL can opened as designed. ',
1;9.�'009 ?009 Surface Water Desien i�?anaal—:'lppendix A
A-30 V I
���i����A�
���►��' ■ .�5�
CONSTRUCiION PRODUCiS INC.
� �
StormFilter Inspection and
Nlaintenance Procedures
;
,
... ;
. :_,
��
F '
f
�
,
�,:.
71�e Seotmwaler Management
�tormFiiter��
Maintenance Guidelines In addition to these two activities,it is important to check
The primary purpose of the Stom�water Management the condition of the StormFilter unit after major storms for
a, potential damage caused by high(Iows and for high sediment
StormFilter is to filter out and prevent pollutants from entering accumulation that may be caused by localized erosion in ihe
our watervvays.Like any effective 6ltration system,periodically dralnage area.It may be necessary to adjust the inspecdoN
these pollutants must be removed to restore the StormFilter to its maintenance schedule depending on the actual operating " �
full efficiency and effectiveness, conditions encountered by the system. In general,inspectfon
Maintenance requirements and frequency are dependent on the adivibes can be conducted at anytime,and maintenance should
pollutant toad characteristics of each site. Maintenance activities occur,if warrantetl,in late summer to earty fall when flows into '
may be required in the event of a chemical spill or due to the system are not likely to he present.
excessive sediment loading from site erosion or extreme storms.lt
is a good practice to inspect the system after majorstorm events. Malll'�eYlaI1C@ Fr@[,U@I1CS/
The p�imary factor controlling timing of maintenance of the
Maintenance Procedures StormFilter ls sediment loading.
Although there a�e likely many effective maintenance q properly functloning system will remove solids from water by
options, we believe the following procedure is efflcient and trappfng particulates ln the porous stn.idure of the filter media '�
can be implemented using common equipment and exlsting ��slde the cartridges.The flow through the system will naturally �
mai ntenance protornts. A two step procedure is recommended decrease as more and more particulates are trapped.Eventually
as follows: the flow through the cactridges will be low enough to require
1. (nspectiot� replacement.It may be possible to extend the usable span of the
Inspection of the vault interior to determine the need for �nridges by removing sediment from upstream trapping devices
maintenance. on a routine as-needed basis In order to prevent material from
� being re-suspended and discharged to the Storm�ilter treatment
2. Maintenance system.
Cartridge replacement
Sediment remova) Site conditions greatly influence malntenance requirements.
Storm�ilter units located in areas with erosion or active
Inspeetion and Maintenanee Timing construction may need to be inspected and maintained more
At least one scheduled inspection should take place per year with often than those with fully stabilized surface conditions.
maintenance following as warranted. The maintenance frequency may be adjus#ed as additional I }
First, an inspection shoufd be done before the winter season. monitoring informatlon becomes available during the inspection � �
During the inspectton the need for maintenance should be Progrem.Areas that dev�lop k�own problems should be
determined and, if disposal during maintenance will be required, Inspected more ftequently than areas that demonstrate no �
samples of the accumulated sediments and med(a should be problems,parttcularly after major storms.Ultimately,inspection
- obtained. and maintenance activities should be scheduted based on the
hlstoric records and characteristics of an(ndividual5tormHlter
Second,if warranted,a maintenance(replacement of the filter rystem or site. It is recommended that the site owner develop
cartridges and remova)of accumulated sedlments)should be a database to properly manage StormFf(ter inspectlon and
performed during perlods of dry weather. maintenance programs.
Pr(or to the development of the maintenance database,the
following maintenance frequencfes should be followed:
tnspectlon
�f_ One time per year
� After maJor storms
F Maintenance
_ As needed,based on results of InspectEon(The average
maintenance Iffecyde is approxlmate(y 1-3 years)
f;, --�_� Per Regulatory requirement
In the event of a chemical spill
', � Frequencies should be updated as required,The recommended
� ��Y � � ��'�?. ''' .- ;�' :. '� � ; inidal frequency for inspection is one time per year,StormRlter
.
��'"�f�--''�`�'� ' ' '`-=�;4,s ' units should be inspected after major storms. � �
�� -�_��� - r. .
�, ._L✓;�,1 .� ,�` . .
�e n_ y� ��;.r;'�,�' ���'==.ti'� _ _ _ ��.
Sediment removal a�d cartridge replacement on an as needed 7.Remove safety equipment.
basis ts recommended unless site conditions warrant. 8.If appropriate, make notes about ihe local drainage area
Onte an understand'mg of site characte�tstics has 6een re�ative to ongoing constnution,erosion probl�ns,or high
" • established, maintenance may not be needed for one to three loading of otF►er materiais to the system.
- years,but inspedion is warranted and recommended annualiy. 9.Discuss conditions that wggest ma(ntenance and make
� decision as to weather or not maintenance is needed.
Inspecfiion Procedures Maintenance Decision lree
The primary goal of an inspecdon(s to assess the condition of The need for maintenance is typicaUy based on rewlts of the
the cartridges relative to the leVel of visual sediment(oading as inspection. The following Maintenance Dedsion Tree shouW be used as
it relates to decreased treatment capacity.It may be desirable to a general guide. (Other facton,such as Regulatory Requirements,may
conduct this inspection during a riorm to observe the relative need to be considered)
#!ow through the filter cartridges.If the wbmerged cartridges FQ- .�
are severely plugged�then typkally large amounts of sediments y� •
will be present and very IKtle flow will be discftarged from the
drainage pipes,if thfs is the case,then maintenance is warranted
� and the cartridges need to be replaced,
Warning:in the case of a spill,the worker should abort
� � Inspection activides until the proper guidance Is obtained.
Notify the local hazard mntrol agency and COMECH
construcdon Products immediately.
To condudan fnspection:
Important: Inspection should be performed by a person who ,
is famiHarwilh the operadon and configuration of the
StormFilter treatment unit.
1. If appflcable,set up safety equipment to protect and notify
surrounding vehide and pedesti-ian traffia ,
2.Visuaily inspect the external condition of the unit and take 1.Sediment loading on the vauh floor.
• nofes cohcerning defecEs/problerns. a. If>4"of accumulated sediment, rnaintenance is
requfred.
2.Sedtment loading on top of the cartridge.
�; � a. If>1/4"of accumulatbn,maintenance is rec�ired.
t;r1.: ' 3.SuUmerged cartridges.
},'Yti:i�.'ty�t' .-
�;'; ,:�1�.:si��,� ��� - a. If>4"of static water in the cartridge bay for more
?Ifr`-t� �'�r,,`�h�'���o=i.�
�;;.> �'�__,�,�. , ,�. , t�, that 24 hours after end of ra(n event�ma(ntenartce is
_ , , ���
L_ p,;!'�,�,�•3''f:���;,:r_ ,... a
�_�, � �t��^�r�r ; .,-� required.
��;���.�,����;��-
- ,� -� _ 4.Plugged media.
a. !f pore space between media granules is absent,
a;��;' '''� ' ' maintenance is required.
� f•. a�"` -e ,..�,
�•,..
�'�,�.w,�',u�..4.,,-3:—' —`� - 5.Bypass mndition.
� � .tr• F�:°;• •
�.( a. If inspection is conducted during an average tain fall
S1;9�✓�4.
� �� �I���:• x.� ;., ev�nt and StormFdter remains in bypass condidon
��b i1 ���F�,�'�,,,��. (water over the intemal ou�et baffle wail w wbmerged
�i*i'.�,�;�,��`'�,��"�i��,.l��.��i `��- . cartridges),maintenance is required.
it�,ti d•, r,��'. 1 .t.�J;�.r:•t� �
3.Open the access portals to the vault and allow the system vent. 6.Hazarclous material release.
4.Witfiout enteting the vault,vfsually(nspect the instde of the a. If hazardous mate�fal re{ease(automotive fluids w other)
unit,and note accumulations of liqulds and solids. ts teported,maintenanoe is required.
5,Be sure to record the(evel of sediment build-up on the floor of 7,pronounced scum line.
the vault, In the forebay�and on top of the cartrldges.If tlow a. If pronounced sam line(say�z 1/4"thlcW ls present
� is occurr(ng,-note the flow of water per drainage pipe.Record above top cap,maintenance is required.
all observattons.Digital plctures are valuable for historical
documentat(on, 8.Calendar lifec�tcle.
6.Close and fasten the access portals. a. If system Mas not been maintained for 3 years
maintenance Is required.
— Assumptions
• No rai�fall for 24 hours or more '
„ •�
• No upstream detention(at least not drain(ng Into StormFilter) �
• Structure Is online ,
� • Outlet pipe is dear of obstruction �,� ;.� -
• Construction bypass ts plugged � �
{ ,i.,
Main#enance -
Depending on the configuration of the particular system,
malntenance personnel wtl!be required to enter the vault to
perform the matntenance.
Importan�If vault entry is requited,OSHA rules for confined
' I
space entry must be followred. ����
Filter cartridge replacement should occur durtng dry weather. • ''�
it may be necessary to plug the filter inlet pipe ff base flows is
o�currmg. �4
�
��;
Replac�nent cartridges can be delivered to tl�e site or customers �_,: �� '
faality.Infiormation conceming how to obtain the replacemeni � '�,�r1��ti: '•y "� ;"' ; ,
cartridges is available from CONTECH Construction Products. � p��-i-' '�� ' '�
'� '` l�
Warning;in the case of a spitl,ihe maintenance personnel ` ,
shauld abort maintenance aciivities until the proper '
guidance is obtained. Notify the loca)hazard control ��
agency and CONTECH Construction Products immediately. � '
To conduct cartridge replacement and sediment removal � -�
maintenance: Important:Note that cartridges containing leaf inedia(CSF)do
1.If applicable,set up safety equipment to protect maintenance not require unscrewing from their connectors.i'ake care
personnel and pedestrians from site hazards, not to damage the manifold connedors.This connector
'+` 2.�sually inspect the extemal condition of the unit and take should remain installed in the manifold and could be
notes concerning defecWproblems. capped during the maintenance adivity to prevent
sediments from entering ihe underdrain manifold.
3.Open the doors(access portals)to the vauit and allow the
- system to vent B. Remove the used cartridges(up to 250 lbs.each)irom the
4.Without entering the vault,give the inside of the unit, vault.
induding components,a general condition in�et8on. Impor#ant:Care must be used to avoid damaging the
5.Make notes aboutthe extema!and internal condition of cartridges during removal and installation.The cost of
� the vault G'tve pa�ticular attention to recording the level of repairing components damaged during maintenance
sediment build-up on the floor of the vault,in the forebay, will be the responsibility of the owner unless CONTECH
and on top of the intemal components. Construction Products performs the maintenance activities
6.Using appropriate equipment offload the replacement and damage is not related to discharges to the system.
carbidges(up to 150 Ibs.each)and set aside. C. Set the used cartridge aslde or load onto the hauling
A-_ 7.Remove used ca�tridges from the vault using one of the truck.
following methodr.
D. Continue steps a through c until all cattridges have been
Method 1: removed.
A. This activity will requ'ire that maintenance personnel enter I
the vault to remove the cartridges from the under dra(n �ethod 2:
manifold a�d place them under the vault opening for A. Enter the vault using appropriate mntined space
lifting(removan• Unscrew(rnunterc}ocktn►1se rotations) protocols.
eacfi filter cartridge from the underdrain connector. g. Unscrew the cartridge cap.
Roll the loose cartridge,on edge,to a convenient spot
beneath the vauk aceess. C. R�nove the�rtridge hood saews(3)hood and float. . ,
Using appropriate Ftioist�ng equipment,attach a cable D. At location undet shucture aaess,tfp the cartridge on its
from the boorn,crane,or tripod to the loose cart�ldge. �ide,
-. Contact CONT'EEH Construction Products for wgg�ted
attachment de+sces_
lmportant:Note that cartridges containing media other than
the(eaf inedia require unstrewing f�om their threaded
connectors.Take care not to damage the manifold
connectors.This connector should remai�installed in the
manifold and capped if necessary, i
D. Empty the cartridge onto the vauit floor.Reassemble the I'
empty cartridge. _ __
� ��'_ . �. ,��1 . ,
E. Set the empty,used cartrEdge aside or load onto the - -- ,
hauling truck. ~'--�-: - � .� -���.w
� ��� '� ��'
F Continue steps a through e until all cartridges have been . _;� ���_� ,
removed. _ ,:a=.
_ . _�
�
�'
�'; - � -
/� , ��
� -
-. `�
r—' � ��' �`, -r , .
- � • .. :s, . .
� '�... i �� _
_ �, •`��+;�.'�.,�,
{,, • t:ro
� �..�' �1 ;�,Y .r '� :t`.4
T: :,t ' .• ___-��f
_,•�. ,;� ,1•'�y}-j� ' -._,-�. --
�:'C_"�-�7r., c-+.
} � �;' -�� .•^�-�- _.� _':_���
`;`:.� •�►:.z�-�.:_��i`-it'44.�',�.; :1 �T;
.0 *�':'r:i `F�r.'��
p S `:1'l�.
.k. .��'•L � ��a
� -'a�• � ,�- �t�:'s-`~ � �..���^V��� li
�. ' �. ` I'�' J..������~S•_%:.-Vt������' .�
-r� '?tr_•,£;._'C.�, -��� •.t r:y�...,,yP --
F,: ��: ,,:
:j.:�� -
'� .c';,'`' e.- -
>r;�}� �f l}, �:� A .,` '...
__, - ,
_'< .�_ '�,
.,j -
8. Remove accumutated se�liment from the fioor of the �
vault and from the forebay.This can most effectivefy be „ �
accompfished by use of a vacuum trudc, ,r � ,
9. Once the sediments are removed,assess the condition of the , _�'= - �y ' ��`��;;-; '
vault and the conditton of the connectors,The connectors - - - � -
are short sections of 2-inch schedule 40 PVC,or threaded -' - -'� ',
_. schedule 80 PVC that should protrude aUout 1"above the - ��f�
floor of the vault lightly wesh down the vault int�tor.
a. Replace any damaged connectors.
10. Using the vawum truck boom,crane,or tripod,lower and
instalf the new cartridges.Once again,take care not to
damage rnnnections.
11.Close and fast�the door.
12.Remove safety equlpment.
13. �inally�dispose of the accumulated materials in accordance •
. _'" wid�applicable regulations.Make arrangements to�etum ihe
used emntv cartridges to CONTECH Construction Products. �
Rela�ed Mairntenante Ac�tiviti�s - Material Disposaf
Pet-�armed on an as needed basis 7he accumulated sed'�mentfound in stormwater treatment
StormFilter units are often just one of many siructures in a more and conveyance systems must be handled and disposed of in
comprehetts(ve stormwater dratnage artd treatrnent system. acwrdance with regu(atory protomfs.It is possib;e for seditnents .
to contain measurable concentrations of heavy rrtetals and ."
in order for malntenance of the StormFiiter ta be suaessful,it organic chemicals{su�h as pesticides and petroteum products).
is imperathre that all ofiher components be properiy mafntalned. qreas with the greatest pabential#or high poliutant loading
The maintenance/xepair of upstream fac+tities should be carr(ed �n�lude industrial areas and heavil�travefed roads.
out prior to StormFiFt2r ma(ntenance activittes.
5edfinents and water must be ctisposed of in accordence with
tn additlon to consldering upstream facilities,It fs also important all applicable waste dksposal regula�ons.When schedufing
to carrect any Probfems identified In the drainage area. Drainage m���tepance,consideretlon must he made for the disposa!of
area concems may indude:erasian pro6lems,heavy oi1 loading, solld and I(quid wastes,Tf�is typically requites coordination with
and discharges of inappropriate materials. a 1a�a�tanclfil)for sotld warte disposal. F�r Ilquid waste disposal
a number of options are avaiEable inctuding a municipal vacuurn
truck decant facilitK local waste water treatment p[ant or on-site
treatment and discharge.
�b�PAPE� .
t�
`�♦ �
soHsi�uc o eao�nnmsix's.
soa.��s.i�zz
tvtiraw con#ech-cpl.com
SuppOrt
� Drawings and speci�ications are avaitabl�at contechstormwafier:com.
• SEte-specific design suppott is avaifabl�#rom our engineers.
��009 CONTECt�i ConstrucEion Produc#s(ttc.
CONI'ECH Consti-uction Proc�ucts 1nc.provides slte soluHons for ths cf�rif engineering indus�COMECN's portfollo includes
brldges,drainage,sanitary sewer,stormwater and eerth stabif(zatton products, For information on otfier CON1'ECH divlsion
ofhetings,visit coRtech-cPi•rom or caf18Q0,�38,1122
�fotl�ing in th3s catalog shauld be construed as an expressed warrenty or an Implisd warranty of inerchantabNity or fitness for -. .
anyr p�rticuisr purpose,see the coM�ECH standard quotation or�cknowiedgement for applicable warranties and other terms
anc#condi#ions of sale.
Tfie prodvctW desv8�ad may be protated by one or more of tM toQov+tng US pateMs: s,92Z,629;3,6�;57Q 5,707,5Z7;5,759,d15;5,78D,848;5,985,157:6,OZ7,639;8,350,37A;6,405,218;
6,64t,72D:6,571,54$6,649.046;6.981,118;6,999,036:7,186,OSd;ref�ed fofdpn patents or othor}+nten[s pen�ng.
i
I � • ° 0 'I'
� Date: Personnel:
. I Location: System 5ize:
� 5ystem Type: Va�lc❑ Cast tn-Piace ❑ I.Inear Cafch Basin ❑ Manhole ❑ O�ttter ❑
� SedimerttThiclmess in Forebay.
Date:
5ediment i7epth on Vauit Floor.
� 5tructural Damage: '
I Esdm�ted Flow from Dralnaqe Pipes('t�available}: �
{ Cartridges Submerged: Yes ❑ f�o ❑ De.pth of Standing Water.
� Stori'r�Fi(ter Maintenance Activities(check off if done and give descrfptian}
' ❑ '[�ash and Deb�is Removal:
� ❑ Minor St�c#ural Repairs:
, � brainage Area Report
� Excessive Oi1 Load€ng: Yes � No � Source: - __
� 5ediment Accumu�ation on Pavement; Yes � No � Soutce:
Eraslon of Candscaped Areas `(es ❑ No �] Source:
� ftems(Veeding Furtfler WoriG
� Dwrters sf�outd coniacC the loca!p�tWic werks department and inquire about how tt�e departmenE dlsposes of their stre�t waste
residuals.
� other�omments: .
f �
I
I .
i
f
I � �
I
i
f
f �
i �
�
� J . '',
!
. f �
�
Review ihe condition feports fron�the prFvious inspeckon visits.
�
o . ' e
� ,
t
Date; Personnel• ( f • � I
Location: SysYem 5iz�: �
System Type: Vault❑ Cast En-Place❑ �fnear Catch Basin ❑ Manho(e ❑ Other ❑ I
List Safe#y Procedures and�qraipmem Used: ,
� i
�
�
Syst�m Observations �
Mohtfis in Serv�ce:
Oi!It►Forebay: Yes ❑ IVo � �
5ediment Depth in Farebay: , �
Sediment Depth on Vaul#Hoor, ,
Structural!]amage:
43rainage Area Report �
Excessive Oil Loading: Yes ❑ t�o ❑ 5ource: �
Sedlment Acntmulation on Pavemen� Yes ❑ Na ❑ Saua're: I
Erosion of t.andscaped Areas: YeS ❑ No [� 5ouree: I -
StormFiiter Cartriclge Replacemenf Mairrtenante Acti+tlfi�s I
Remove Tcash anci Debri�: Yes ❑ tJo ❑ Detalls; �
Replaee Cartridges: Yes ❑ Na � Retafls; �
Sediment Removed: Yes ❑ No � Details: � 'I
Quantity of Sediment Removed{estimate7): . 1 . 'I
Minor 5tructural�Repairs: Yes � iVo � Details: i �
Reslduals{debris,sedimen�?Disposet Methads: I I
Notes; , �
�
1
l
�
I � ��
(
(
. i
Appendix A
Lower Cedar River Basin !
and Nonpoint Pollution
Action Plan
Watershed Management Committee
Lower Cedar River Basin
and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan
�. ` P : I 'i '•� - I .
� r, �� ~}� �� �(��
♦ �4 � �
�l / j ` � ��..'. ..
l�f ' �. t
�� 'Y '�r • 1� a��F 4 •.. �
�>'" •; '�=a �ti � � � A �' `s;.
'-i, �,�
,r� ., . � .. ; �i /r . �� i
� ,� ����� - S />� � } x I /t - -.l
�� I �' r. i .c�,
{• ' �^`/,�I� � § �
-'" +�* t.�� 3�::t, ,, i -- i
a��� ,. t,,ta� ` i -- �- `� �`� , �� �
�
�� .�1��. , . t 1 t.`�; ,,� . C �t �' �;:;
1. • � ► � '��`''*.' � t '`', �..'• . • �
. ,
�` � � �� t��e � . � ;.s.�."„ �,,. �' _.+.�
.
.� , ; � � y'�
� . '� � �"�
�� j. ,"� `r �,:-= =a
��
., r �4��r _ . _ �_��•—`:,�.�
� �� .� ., � �
�, y ���z. �
. ,
t� , �,�,
>
, � ���
I • � �f' ti�� •
\ -�'` " � .a. • .
# . t t-.
yq t �
f 1 ,� � ,f �� , . , I.� .
'- a 4 .
.�
, , ,
. � � ✓x ��,��. . �, �.. }t� ,,. . < �.
1 �,. . � , ,�:. -�.,
� � . � �
�`
� � , , \ •}� +� ;�
� \� � � ,e �,� > ,,
__ :�` �''� �" � r
�.- �
�`
�' '�j
— ,�.' � ,i�k�.' ,'�;
�
� '�
�
�
._ :, i�=-z ���� �_ r� __ .
0 WASHINGTON STATE •� '
O KING COu�TY �D E P A A T M E N T 0 F .� .
�Department of Natural Resources �E C 0 L 0 G Y 'N
Watershed Management Committee
Lower Cedar R.iver Basin and
Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan
Adopted by Metropolitan King County Council
July 1997
July 1998 Printing ',
'' King County Department of Natural Resources Cedar River Watershed Management Committee
Water and Land Resources Division City of Renton
700 Fifth Avenue King Conservation District
Suite 2200 King County
Seattle,Washington 98104 Muckieshoot Indian Tribe
(206)296-6519 Seattle Public Utilities Department
Trout Unlimited
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Washington Department of Nahzral Resources
Washington Department of Transportation
Washington Farm Forestry Association
Funded in part by the 6Yashington State Departmen!of Ecolog��Centemzinl Clean bYater Ftnul
King County Esecutive
Gary Locke
Metropolitan King County Conncil Waspington Department of Ecology
Maggi Fimia,District I Bob�uffy,Environmental Planner
Cynthia Sullivan,District 2 Kitty Gillespie,Project Manager
Louise Miller,District 3
Larry Phillips,District 4 WaEershed Management Cammittee
Ron Sims,District 5 David Beedle and Leslie Groce-Muckleshoot Indian
Rob McKenna,District 6 � Tribe
Pete von Reichbauer,District 7 Paul Crane—Boeing Company
Greg Nickels,District$ Nancy Davidson,P.E. - Seattle Public Utilities
Kent Pullen,District 9 Jack Davis-King Conservation District
Larry Gossett,District 10 Gary Engman and Bob Gerke-WA Department of
Jane Hague,District 1 I Fish and Wildlife
Brian Derdowski,District 12 Keith Hinman-King County WLRD
Christopher Vance,District 13 Kay Johnson-Renton Chamber of Commerce
(retired),Cedar River CAC
Department of Natural Resources Louis Kahn-Washington Farm Forestery Associarion
Pam Bissonnette,Director Linda Smith-US Army Corps of Engineers
Ron Straka,P.E.-City of Renton Surface Water Utility
Water and Land Resources Division Rex Thompson-WA Dept.of Natural Resources
Nancy Hansen,Division Manager Frank Urabeck,P.E. -Trout Untimited
Debbie Arima,Assistant Division Manager Bob Winter,P.E. - WA Dept.of Transportation
Bili Eckel,Regional Water Resources Services
Manager Citizen Advisory Commiftee 'I
Mike Balasa �
Contributing Staff Norm Bunkowski II
Keith Hinman,Basin Planning Program Manager Judith Fillips ;
Roz Glasser,Project Manager Ray Griffin
Jean White,Project Manager Brad Habenicht I
John Adams,Planner Janice Hoon(deceased)
Derek Booth,Ph.D.,Geologist Kay 7ohnson
Glenn Evans,P.E.,Senior Engineer Bob Karinen
David Hartley,P.E.,Ph.D.,Hydrologist Laure Iddings
Gino Lucchetti,Senior Ecologist Ed Matthews
Kate Rhoads, Senior Water Quaiity Specialist Paul Szewczykowski
Ruth Schaefer, Senior Ecologist
Technical Advisors
Supporting Staff Carolyn Boatsman-City of Renton
Fred Bentler,Planning Support Technician Mike Bonoff,Rand Little,and George Schneider-
Anne Bikle,Basin Steward Seattle Public Utilities Department
Rika Cecil,Resource Planner Larry Fisher and Hal Michael-Washington
Karen Goto,P.E.,Senior Engineer Deparhnent of Fish and Wildlife
Mary Jorgensen,Resource Planner Johnathan Frodge,Ph.D. -King County Department of
• Ted Krause,Planning Support Technician Natural Resources,Wastewater Treatment Division
Mark Lampard,P.E.,Engineer Dan Harvey,P.E.-US Army Corps of Engineers
Barbara Nelson,Technical`Vriter David Jennings,P.E.-City of Renton
Laurel Preston,Graphic Technician Greg Zentner-Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Bill Priest,Ecological Technician
David Rigley,Engineer
Rran Solomon,Ph.D., Senior Engineer Text ivill be rnade available in large print, Braille, or
Ruoxi Zhang,Planning Graphic Supervisor audiotape as requested.
WMC Lower Cedar River Basin Plan ii
Table of Contents
Page
Listof Figures and Tables............................................................................................................v
ExecutiveSummary.....................................................................................................................vii
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan.......1-1
The Major Conditions in the Cedar River Basin ...................................................................1-1
The Major Plan Recommendations........................................................................................1-5
TheBasin Planning Area.......................................................................................................1-8
Aboutthe Plan Itself..............................................................................................................1-15
Chapter 2: Goals and Priority Actions...................................................................................2-1
Introduction............................................................................................................................2-1
Flood-Damage Reduction......................................................................................................2-4
Aquatic Habitat Protection and Restoration ..........................................................................2-11
Protection of Water Quality from Nonpoint Source Pollution..............................................2-16
AquiferProtection..................................................................................................................2-20
~ Cedar River Watershed Management Program .......................2-23
..............................................
Relationship of Chapter 2 to Chapters 3 and 4......................................................................2-24
Chapter 3: Subarea Recommendations..................................................................................3-1
Introdu ct i on............................................................................................................................3-1
CedarRiver Mainstem...........................................................................................................3-5
NorthernTributaries...............................................................................................................3-17
SouthernTributaries...............................................................................................................3-27
� Taylor Creek .......................................3-37
, ...................................................................................
PetersonCreek.......................................................................................................................3-43
MiddleTributaries .................................................................................................................3-49
RockCreek.............................................................................................................................3-55
Chapter 4: Detailed Descriptions of Recommendations........................................................4-1
Introduction............................. .4-1 '
..............................................................................................
Capital Improvement Projects................................................................................................4-3
Basinwide Recommendations................................................................................................4-31
Subarea Programmatic Recommendations............................................................................4-83
Chapter 5: Implementation Strategy......................................................................................5-1
' Introduction............................................................................................................................5-1
Priority Setting: Balancing Competing Needs.......................................................................5-1
Sharing Implementation Roles............................................
...................................................5-5
Implementation Process: Long-Term Watershed Management ............................................5-10
iii Table of Cortte�rts
_, j i,
1
i
Appendix A: WMC Vision, Goals, and Objectives...................................................................A-1
PlanVision Statement............................................................................................................A-1
Goalsand Objectives.............................................................................................................A-1
Appendix B: Addendum to Bedload Transport Analysis..........................................................A-9
Appendix C: Hydrology and Forest Retention..........................................................................A-11
Technical Note 1: Upland Flooding and Channel Stability...................................................A-11
Technical Note 2: Downstream Analysis Peterson, Rock, and Taylor Creek Ravines........A-19
Appendix D: Significant Resource Area Map, Definitions, and List........................................A-29
Definitions..............................................................................................................................A-29
Si nificant Resource Areas SRAs ..........................................................A-30
g ( ............................
Appendix E: Estimation of Salmonid Production Potential and Costs of Fish Habitat
Restoration Opportunities................................................................................................A-35
ExecutiveSummary...............................................................................................................A-35
Introduction............................................................................................................................A-3 8
Background............................................................................................................................A-39
Methods..................................................................................................................................A-42
Results....................................................................................................................................A-55
Discussion..............................................................................................................................A-58
Conclusions............................................................................................................................A-65
Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................A-66
LiteratureCited......................................................................................................................A-66
List of Tables and Figures......................................................................................................A-69
Cedar River Habitat Opportunity Concept Reports...............................................................A-89 ,
Bibliography ................................................................................................................................A-145 II'�
� List of Acronyms 'I
63;�11C Lower Cedar•River Basi�i Plart iv
List of Figures and Tables
Page
Figure 1-1 Cedar River Drainage Basin...................................................................................1-3
Figure 1-2 Current Land Use/Land Caver................................................................................1-11
Figure 1-3 Future Land Use/Land Cover..................................................................................1-13
Figure 3-1 Subarea Boundaries ................................................................................................3-3
Figure 3-2 Cedar River Mainstem Reach 1 ..............................................................................3-11
Figure 3-3 Cedar River Mainstem Reach 2..............................................................................3-13
Figure 3-4 Cedar River Mainstem Reach 3..............................................................................3-15
Figure 3-5 Maplewaod and Orting Hill Subbasins...................................................................3-21
Figure 3-6 Cedar Grove Subbasin ............................................................................................3-23
Figure 3-7 Cedar Hills and Webster Lake Subbasins...............................................................3-25
Figure 3-8 Ginger Creek Subbasin...........................................................................................3-31
Figure 3-9 Molasses Creek Subbasin .......................................................................................3-33
Figure 3-10 Madsen Creek and Summerfield Subbasins ...........................................................3-35
Figure 3-11 Taylor Creek Subarea.............................................................................................3-41
Figure 3-12 Peterson Creek Subarea..........................................................................................3-47
Figure 3-13 Middle Tributaries Subarea.....................................................................................3-53
Figure 3-14 Rock Creek Subarea............................................................................................:...3-59
Figure 4-1 Renton Urban Growth Area....................................................................................4-63
Figure 4-2 Tributary R/D Standards for New Development....................................................4-73
Figure 5-1 Comparison of Core Plan Costs - Mainstem vs. Tributary Areas...........................5-6
Figure 5-2 Comparison of Core Plan Costs - Habitat vs. Water Quality .................................5-7
� Figure 5-3 Comparison of Core Plan Costs - CIPs vs. Program Recommendations................5-S
Figure C-1 Flow Benefits of Forest Protection (Till Soil Site, High Runoffl...........................A-16
Figure C-2 Flow Benefits of Forest Protection (Till Soil Site, Low Runof� ...........................A-17
Figure C-3 Flow Benefits of Forest Protection (Outwash Soil Site).........................................A-18
Figure C-4 Erosion Potential in Taylor Creek Ravine, Catchment TS Outlet ..........................A-24
Figure C-5 Erosion Potential in Taylor Creek Ravine, Catchment T2 Outlet ..........................A-25
Figure C-6 Erosion Potential of Flows Downstream of Peterson Lake....................................A-26
Figure C-7 Erosion Potential in Lower Rock Creek.................................................................A-27
Figure D-1 Significant Resource Area Map..............................................................................A-33
Figure E-1 Pre-Project Coho and Cutthroat Smolt Production Potential as a Function of
StreamGradient......................................................................................................A-88
� Figures and Tables
Tabie 2-1 Where to Find Chapter 2 Recommendations in Chapters 3 and 4..........................2-26
Table 4-1 Priorities for Open Space Acquisitions...................................................................4-38
Table 4-2 Cedar Open Space,�Mitigation Banking, and Restoration Sites .............................4-42
Table 4-3 Tributary R/D Requirements..........................
.........................................................4-71
Table 5-1 Cedar River Basin Plan Recommendations............................................................5-14
Table 5-2 Other Surface and Groundwater Management Activities in the Cedar River
Basin........................................................:..............................................................5-20
Table B-1 Cedar River Sediment Data(Revised)....................................................................A-10
Table E-1 General Physical Data for the Cedar River Basin...................................................A-70
Table E-2 Stream Channels Accessible to Anadromous Salmonids in the Lower Cedar
RiverBasin..............................................................................................................A-70
Table E-3 Biological Performance Values Used for�stimating Salmonid Production
Potential of Cedar River Habitat Projects...............................................................A-71
Table E-4 Fish Production Data and Values Used for Estimating Range of Fish
Production...............................................................................................................A-72
Table E-5 Reported Literature Values for Egg-to-Fry Survival Rates and Female
Spawner Densities for Sockeye and Chum Salmon................................................A-73
Table E-6 Project Description and Habitat Dimensians for Cedar River Habitat
Opportunities...........................................................................................................A-74
Table E-7 Amount of Salmonid Habitat From Habitat Projects in the Lower Cedar
RiverBasin..............................................................................................................A-78
Table E-8 Annual Production Potential of Juvenile Salmonids from Habitat Projects in
' the Lower Cedar River..............................
..............................................................A-79
Table E-9 Annual Production Potential of Individual Habitat Projects in the Lower
CedarRiver.............................................................................................................A-80
Table E-10 Long-Term Costs and Salmonid Production Potential for Habitat Projects in
the Lower Cedar River............................................................................................A-82
Table E-11 Land Ownership and Risk of Lost Opportunity of Lower Cedar River
HabitatProjects.......................................................................................................A-84
Table E-12 Number of Spawners Needed to Achieve Juvenile Production Estimates .............A-87
if�MC Lotinel•Cedar�River•Basin Plan vi
Executive Summary
The Cedar River Basin and Nanpoint Pollution Action Plan describes the condition of the basin
and proposes solutions to the problems of flooding and declining salmon and steelhead runs. It
also recommends preventive measures to protect water quality, groundwater supplies, and habitat
as the basin planning area continues to develop. Preventing problems in the watershed will be
much more cost-effective over time than trying to correct problems once they occur.
The recommendations in the Cedar River Basin Plan have been prioritized into a Core Plan
consisting of capital projects and ongoing administration of programs that would, at a minimum,
accomplish the Plan's most important goals. This Core Plan would:
• Resolve the threat of hazardous flooding for approximately 90 percent of the 130 homes
currently at greatest risk;
• Protect the most valuable remaining aquatic habitat sites in the basin planning area, restore
those with the best chance for recovery, and help ensure long-term productivity of Lake
Washington salmon and steelhead; and
• Maintain the Cedar River's high water quality.
i
The Cedar River Basin Plan offers a unique opportunity and challenge to meet the needs of urban
and rural residents living in the Cedar River basin, and to provide for reduced itood damages and
long-term, self-sustaining fish runs.
The Cedar River Basin Plan combines a traditional King County Basin Plan,jointly funded by
King County and the City of Renton,with a Nonpoint Source Pollution Action Plan funded by
the Washington Department of Ecology and called for by the Puget Sound Water Quality ,
Management Plan. The Basin Plan was prepared under the poIicy direction of the Cedar River
Watershed Management Committee, composed of representatives of local and state gor�ernment
agencies, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and non-governmentat organizations. A Citizens
Advisory Committee, made up of area residents, also contributed to the develapment of the Plan.
King County's Water and Land Resources Division(formerly Surface Water Management
Division) acted as lead in plan preparation.
THE BASIN PLANNING AREA
The Cedar River is one of five major rivers in King County and is the largest tributary to Lake
Washington. The river drains an elongated basin of 188 square miles that extends westward from
the crest of the Cascades to the southem shore of Lake Washington in the City of Renton. The
upper basin, which is almost exclusively owned by the City of Seattle, supplies drinking water
for two-thirds of the City of Seattle and its regional customers, It is an unpopulated mountainous
area protected from land use change and managed for long-term forestry and wildlife Ilabitat.
vii Executive Siunma�y
i
The Cedar River Basin Plan focuses on the lower third of the basin where floods and erosion
directly impact people and property, and where ongoing development threatens aquatic habitat
and the quality and quantity of ground and surface waters. The basin planning area extends from
the Landsburg Dam ta the river mouth in Renton, a 66-square mile area encompassing both the
northern and southern plateaus and the mainstem valley. The lower basin has an extensive
surface water system that includes 15 named tributaries, many high-value wetlands, lakes, and
the Cedaz River itself.
W,A�1C Lower Cedar River Basrn Plan viii �
Northern Tributaries
INTRODUCTION
The Northern Tributaries subarea is composed of the subbasins of Maplewood Creek and the
Orting Hill, Cedar Grove, Cedar Hills, and Webster Lake tributaries. They all display the
three-part profile typical of the western portion of the basin planning area, originating on the
gently sloping plateau above the Cedar River, dropping through steep ravines cut into the valley
wall, and finally flowing across the low-gradient valley floor to meet the Cedar River.
Land use is mostly residential, and is generally densest in the west, changing gradually from
urban in the Maplewood Creek subbasin to relatively rural in the Webster Lake area. Maplewood
Creek and the Orting Hill and Cedar Grove tributaries are inside the urban growth boundary, so
most future growth is expected to be concentrated here.
Local drainage problems and minor flooding are fairly common on the poorly drained plateau
during larger storms, but hazardous flooding has not been a serious concern here in the past, nor
�
is it expected to be in the future.
In addition to the expected loss of aquatic habitat through encroachment or outright displacement
of wetland and stream area by development, some of the undeveloped ravines in this subarea
� have experienced the loss of previously high-quality habitat as increases in stormwater runoff
� ' have accelerated natural rates of erosion and mass wasting. The resulting sediment reduces the
flow capacity of the channels, causing flooding and impacting habitat still further.
Water quality in the Northern Tributaries is currently impacted by land development. In the
western portion, within the proposed urban growth boundary, development is expected to
intensify, fizrther increasing pollutant loadings associated with urbanization—such as road
drainage, household hazardous wastes,pesticides, and herbicides. In addition, areas within the
Maplewood Creek subbasin have also experienced higher than average septic system failures.
Still, of the entire basin planning area, the East Renton Plateau, which is inside the urban growth
boundary and has relatively low-density development, is best suited to higher intensity land uses.
This is because it has the lowest resource value of any area in the basin, and it lacks tne high
quality aquatic resource values that still remain outside the urban growth boundary. If higher
density is to be accommodated in this subarea, however, measures such as those that follow will
be needed to protect the City of Renton's sole-source aquifer, protect and restore and the
remaining wetland and stream resources, and reduce current and projected drainage problems,
while allowing available land to be used most efficiently in the future. In addition, any proposal
for density changes would require a comprehensive plan amendment involving an environmental
review and opportunity for public comment and approval by the City or County council, as
appropriate.
The Basin Plan's principal capital recommendation for this subarea would reduce flooding in the j
Puget Colony Homes subdivision and erosion in Maplewood Creek ravine. Several additional
capital projects would reduce less significant flooding and restore or enhance a number of
3-17 Chapter 3:Subarea Recommen�latiolis I
degraded aquatic habitats. Several programmatic recommendations would seek to reduce
erosion, habitat damage, and water quality degradation that are projected to occur in this
urbanizing subarea.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Please see Chapter 4 for the complete text of the following recommendations, the locations of
which are shown on Figures 3-5, 3-6, and 3-7 at the end of this section. Note that some of these
recommendations apply in other subbasins and so have already been described earlier in this
chapter.
Capital Improvement Projects
* Denotes Core Plan recommendations, which are those recommendations that would
accomplish, at a minimum, the major Plan goals (see Chapter 5).
* Maplewood Creek Habitat and Drainage Improvements (CIPs 3120*, 3122*, and 3123):
Three interrelated CIPs are recommended for Maplewoad Creek(Tributaries 0303, 0304). In the
� headwaters of the east fork of the creek(Tributary 0303), drainage system improvements would
address frequent flooding problems in the Puget Colony Homes subdivision. The solution to the
flooding, however, is designed so that there would be no increase in flows to the currently
eroding ravine that carries the east fork from the subdivision down the valley wall. The next
project would stabilize this ravine to stem erosion and subsequent downstream sedimentation;
the same would be done in the steep reaches of the west fork. In the lowest reach, fish passage
would be provided by replacing two existing sediment ponds, which capture the eroded
sediment, with an improved one that is designed to allow upstream fish passage.
* Retrofit Retention/Detention (RlD) Ponds (CIP 3127): Existing R/D facilities would be
i-etrofitted, ��vhere feasible, with additional capacity and water quality controls.
� Tributary 0316A and Wetland 32 Restoration (CIP 3126): Large woody debris would be
placed in the eroded channel, and denuded banks would be revegetated along a half-mile reach to
restore the habitat function of this once-productive small stream. The north side of Wetland 32
would be fenced. In addition, related recommendations for management of the Stoneway Gravel
Mine (Northern Tributaries recommendation NT 1) would address both habitat and water quality
concerns in this tributary.
� Tributary 0303A Culvert Replacement and Rechanneling(CIP 3121): A damaged 12-inch
culvert would be replaced with a larger size to reduce flooding at the intersection of SE 132nd ;
Street and 146th Avenue SE. Polluted road runoff would be treated by restoring an existing '
300-linear-foot storm drain pipe as an open channel.
• Orting Hill Tributary (0307) Realignment(CIP 3124): The lowest reach of Orting Hill
tributary (Tributary 0307) would be realigned into a new fish-usable channel and constructed
wetland complex along lower Jones Road, possibly as mitigation for the construction of the new
Elliot Bridge or other road projects in the area.
WMC Lower Ceda��River Basin Plan 3-I S
• Wetland 36 Restoration and Protection (CIP 3125): Wetland 36 (Francis Lake) is a Class 1
wetland that provides an excellent opportunity for wildlife habitat restoration and enhancement
by voluntary actions or by joint public/private efforts.
Programmatic Recommendatio�s
* Open Space Acquisition (BW 4}: One site in the Northern Tributaries subarea has been
identified for open space acquisition due to iis aquatic habitat values. See Tables 4-1 and 4-2 in
Chapter 4.
* Small Scale Watershed Restoration and Enhancement (BW 5): The Water and Land
Resources (WLRD) Division's existing Small Habitat Restoration Program {SHRP), under the
direction of the Cedar River Basin Steward (BW 16} would undertake small, labor-intensive
projects in the Northern Tribu#aries subarea, using volunteers and other inexpensive labor. See
Table 4-2 in Chapter 4.
* Aquatic Resource Mitigation Bank Sites (BW 6): This recommendation would allow public
agencies to fulfill their Northern Tributaries subarea mitigation obligations in high-quality
mitigation bank sites away from project sites, where such mitigation may be less effective.
* Water Quality Basinwide Recommendations (BWs 9, 14, and 16): Road drainage facilities
would be tnaintained and retrofitted with water quality controls to reduce the impacts of
contaminated road runoff(BW 9). Educational programs would be established and a Cedar River
Basin Steward would provide technical assistance to address nonpoint pollution sources from
highly urbanized systems (BWs 14 and lb).
* Water Quality Treatment Standards (BW 12): Sphagnum bog water quality treatment
standards would be applied to all development in catchment W4 that drains to Wetland 33
(Webster Lake).
* Basin Evaluation (BW 13}: Evaluate implementation and effectiveness of subarea
recommendations in controlling stormwater impacts on structural habitat and water quality.
* Forest Incentive Program (BW 23): An incentive program to encourage landowners to retain
their forest in the rural areas of the basin will be implemented in order to ensure that the Cedar
River has clean, stable streams. Incentives will include tax relief, direct technical assistance,
forest stewardship classes, a small scale forestry demonstratioii site, and individual recognition
of good forest stewards.
• Increased R/D and Runoff Controls {BWs 19*, 20, 21, and 22): Regutatory standards
designed to control the peak, volume, and duration of run�ff by means of infiltratian or detention
(B Ws 19, 20, and 21), and reduce erosion and sedimentation resulting from clearing and grading
activities (BW 22) are recommended to help reduce the expected future habitat problems
associated with the minor flooding and significant erosion in the Maplewood Creek and Orting
Hill, Cedar Grove, and Cedar Hills tributary subbasins. See Figure 4-1 and Table 4-3 in Chapter
4.
3-19 Cliapter 3:Subarea Recomme��dations
• Aquifer Protection (BW 1�: Aquifer recharge and groundwater quality would be protected as
a potable drinking water source.
• Urban Stormwater Management(BW 18): To promote more efficient use of land in the
Renton Urban Growth Area,public/private partnerships would be encouraged to build regional
stormwater quality and quantity treatment facilities.
• On-Site Septic System Pollution (BW 10): Support Sewer extensions to areas of septic tank
failure within the urban growth boundary, where feasible.
j �
_� .
�
, �
a
_'
�
W��fC Lo�ti�er Cedar River Basin Ptmt 3-20
.
�•.�
—---• `.
� �� I , I
� i' � I � I Programmalic Recommendofions
� ` -
♦ � •����j'������t� � _ 8W 9 lmpa+errxn�of 4Nah!r Q�n�bry fran Rood
� i�
/ � ; 1�+ � `�'' Dravioges�llrbon Areos
� t---- �' 8W 10 Q,•S�k Sepric Sysaem Pofhfim
i I r_� ��,..;
! � • � � � - - 8W 12 Waerl�ud�rybeonnenrS��dads.8osK7reomeri
� �, ` j � � location - 8W 13 Bos�Plo�E�
j o aw�d wo�Qesou�es Edu�oAa�rnd v,�C c„�nenr
� � ` �� � : MQp 8W 15 Cedor Ri„er Cam.cc�
� I_.�_�1
� �♦ � $tiN ib 8osxi S�+.o�d Progrom
� oe ^ �������� s BW 18 Urbon Sramworer Na,ogemeM k,in'o�e
� �' 't� i i ���' BW 19 Rekrrim/Dek+u�on S+o�dords
` � \ � � MW3 •� 1�12:Mwt.naw2,uw3.1►.12.�3
ew 20 +�v,a�«,sw�d
j � MW2 0,1 � I �� 8W 21 Nilka6on as o Sbrm`wkr Nu6goaor,TieaMnenr
E � 1 �s� �� Bw 22 Ero�+on ond Sed�mcnanrn Ca:ad Srw+drnds
� � �'
� � �� � � �
� �_�_,�- � 3120.3 Nc .�� s�•..� ♦
-- -� - ---.... � \� ----j' ISO� � ;•�����r�r:�- � --
� I �♦ URBAn! GRGWiH ACEA
! � , t'--_�—'� r' i :r c� � � ��' N �i.'.
, 'b�� '_ ' ,��Z�.Z� O _ i , ' r�
� , O \ '` > , �.��Z� � � I ; •
I / � �
� � . � � 3120.1 • -e f ��� � ,'
E ; i. \ o���x{ � ♦
f � �� � a'� , ��'� ; -
�' p ,l � \ / � J2 • � ♦
� �� ti Y°° � � � �� �
4 3124.1 , r. ,��;ti�' \ i � �/ `� :
� �
� � ..1 ^ o, ��, � / � �
• / - 1 ♦
� �
t -- � ��� � � �
� ,F MW1�.�' . ,.�„—" � \ / � 13 �
� � c �'t� � � // � •
� 3122.2 F" - -- - -�- - J1 1 •
\ � ♦...�..�• t c� ` � �
� Vi ce 1
� I`---'-----'—'��� I �• � la���������•
! 5123�`� .i I ��•�'� ��•�� R
( �: � � �•.��, :
oxvv � � \ .♦
� { , �
•i�� a� f �
/� '� � / �'' ♦
u
/ �' •� � j.`_h !0 ' �:2 lhtBAN GROWfry ta
`� �e I 3124 !• �• �
7 0 4 ni\. � ��v 5.2 �
a .i�
� ' MOOI� ���. /��' �•
� �oJ/�
�k a^ r`�o �, , e�
° S� �?
IJ ` i �� �O
! �� �o
\, os
j \'^ 'l' ua�N b� 07°?9fl
r'�'_'_'_ ^ ��1 GRpyy)f{ RREA.� a_
�-- � io Jo � � ( ,o
i _ /• �
� -���I ' �W
0
,�
i
` Maplewood & Orting Hill Subbasins Figure 3-s
i 'v rB ' P n in
; Cedar Ri e asin la n g Area Recommendations
I N
f a9
� ,�`-1 Stream&Stream Number �-j����rated Area(os of 6/98)
j � Lake/River Urban Grow�h Area Boundary(os of 6/98)
� a"• River Mile�RM)
o va 1@ Mik
� 5 r� Wedond 8�Wedond Number 3113 Oi Copitol Improvemenl Project location$Number
..•• Subbasin Boundary 3117C�Ccpital Improvement ProjectArea$Number �,,,,�, �vP��
.�� Cotchment Boundary . ��� v�c....rou«�acae�r�,
J3 Catchment Number b �,�, ' �..+�i.�
Raising the approximately 60 houses subject to flood flows was rejected because the hazard from
deep, fast flows would remain. Relocating them out of the floodplain was rejected as being too
expensive.
Lead Entity: WLRD, Renton PW
Cooperating Enrities: COE,FEMA, MIT
Estimated cost: $6,500,000: alternative $1,500,000
3113 Person Revetment Modifications (left bank,RM 3.8-4.1)
Recommendation: Set back and bioengineer the existing privately placed revetment and
revegetate a gravel mine site and landslide scar behind the revetment.
I3iscussion: This site has released large quantities of sediment into the lower Cedar River, most
recently during a landslide in 1987. This material, especially the finer particles, chokes spawning
gravels and causes turbidity in the important spawning areas of the lower mainstem.
The steep face of the left bank has been extensively disturbed by gravel mining operations, seeps j
and small streams, and natural erosion from high river flows. At the toe of the slope, the mine
operator placed a bare rock revetment that extends into the river and has suffered &om erosion. It �
has also been overtopped by periodic small landslides,preventing maintenance access.
Modifying the revehnent by cutting back and bioengineering its face and buttressing the slope
above it could reduce flow velocities and future erosion at the toe of the bank and would provide
riparian vegetation. Revegetating the open landslide scar would help stabilize this steep slope.
If funding is limited, reduce the scope of the earthwork and emphasize revegetation. The
�� property owner may be liable for some of the cost of this recommendation.
Lead Entity: DDES
Cooperating Entities: KCPA, Renton PW, COE, FEMA, MIT
Estimated cost: $800,000
� NORTHERN TRIBUTARIES SUBAREA
I�iaplewood Subbasin
3120 Puget Colony Homes Drainage Improvements
Recommendation: The King County Water and Land Resources(WLRD) Division should make
the following improvements in order to address flooding of the Puget Colony Homes subdivision
and local water quality and erosion problems:
WMC Lower Cedar River Basin Pla�t 4-12
1. Upgrade the existing conveyance system through Puget Colony Homes (Tributary 0303, RM
0.4-0.8);
2. Deepen and recontour the existing detention pond in Wetland 150 (RM 0.9); and
3. Purchase a filled portion of Wetland 150 for construction of a new 150,000-cubic-foot
detention pond{RM 1.1),buffer restoration, and enhancement of degraded portions of the
wetland.
Discussion: This solution would address the flooding in the Puget Colony Homes subdivision
without accelerating erosion in Tributary 0303 and would provide water quality benefits as well.
The subdivision currently experiences impaired residential access and road and septic system
flooding on an almost annual basis when the capacity of an undersized storm drain, located
between the houses, is exceeded. In addition, contaminated road runoff from SE 128th Street is
now inadequately treated by a small detention pond in Wetland 150, an 11-acre, partially forested
Class-2 system located immediately north of the subdivision.
The proposed upgrade to the conveyance system would eliminate flooding and septic system
inundation up to the 1 QO-year flow. Deepening the existing small detention pond north of the
, subdivision would provide an additiona120,000 to 40,000 cubic feet of storage with another
150,Q00 cubic feet provided by the new detention pond to be constructed in the filled portion of
Wetland 150. Such additional storage would attenuate discharge peaks by an average of 15%
through the 25-year event, thereby helping to reduce damage in the erosion-prone reaches of
Tributary 0303. Water quality in Wetland 1 S0, and in this portion of the subbasin in general,
would be somewhat improved by the routing of road runoff not currently detained through the
150,000 cubic-foot forebay, and the water quality would also be improved by reducing or
eliminating the short-circuiting of flows through the existing pond. The hydrology of Wetland
� 150 would be somewhat stabilized by attenuation of peak flows in the two detention ponds.
Restoration of a buffer and degraded portions of the wetland would improve its wildlife habitat
' and water quality functions.
This recommendation was chosen from a number of alternatives, which were rejected for various '
reasons. Upgrading the conveyance system alone ($400K) would address flooding but would
increase flows downstream of the subdivision into Tributary 0303, which would exacerbate the
significant erosion that currently exists in that stream. It would also do nothing to improve water i
quality in Wetland 150 nor would it treat runoff from SE 128th Street. Because of the size of the
existing small pond, deepening it, coupled with the conveyance upgrade($SOOK), «�ould still not
provide enough storage to address erosion and water quality without the larger pond.
A regional detention pond located immediately downstream of Puget Colony, as described in the
City of Renton's draft "Maplewood Creek Basin Plan,"would make the wetland work
unnecessary.
' Other alternatives were evaluated—including substituting an underground detention tank for the
proposed solution($600K), using an open channel for conveyance ($1,500K), using a bypass
_ pipeline directly to the mainstem ($3,OOOK), or extending the sanitary sewer service to the area
4-13 Chapter 4: Descripiio�i of Recommendntio�rs
($1,400K�—but were rejected because of their inability to address atl of the concerns or because I!
of their adverse impacts. I,
Lead Entity: WLRD I
Cooperating Entities: Renton, SKCDPH,KC Roads, MIT
Estimated Cost: $800,000.
3121 Tributary 0303A Culvert Replacement and Rechanneling
Recommendation: To alleviate flooding at the intersection of SE 132nd Street and 146th
Avenue SE, King County WLRD should replace a damaged 12-inch concrete culvert under SE
132nd Street with a 24-inch concrete culvert. A 300-foot pipe conveying this tributary
southward, would be removed to improve the quality of road runoff.
Discussion: During 2-year and larger storm events, water ponds at the inlet of the 18-inch culvert
' and backs up to the east along the north side of SE 132nd Street, then flows sauth through a
12-inch culvert at the intersection of SE 132nd Street and 146th Avenue SE and enters the Orting
Hill (Tributary 0307} subbasin. The 12-inch culvert is damaged, forcing water over the road at
this intersection, blocking the access to 12 houses. Replacing the 12-inch culvert with a 24-inch
concrete culvert would solve the road-flooding problem for little cost. Although it would
perpetuate the current flow diversion, Tributary 0307 is able to accept the small additional flow
with little threat of damage, while Tributary 0343 experiences severe erosion downstream of its
confluence with Tributary 0303A and would conceivably suffer from any increase in discharge.
If funding were limited, the 300-foot pipe could be foregone, at a savings of approximately
S 130,000. Two alternatives that were considered for this solution—upgrading the 18"culvert
alone or intercepting and carrying the flows to the upgraded storm drain proposed in CIP 3120—
j would both accelerate erosion downstream.
Lead Entity: WLRD
Cooperating Entities: Renton PW, KC Roads, MIT
Estimated Cost: �150,000: alternative $20,000
3122 Maplewood Ravine Stabilization
Itecommendation: Reduce erosion and subsequent downstream sedimentation and habitat
degradation in the Maplewood subbasin by undertaking the following actions:
1. Tightline two daylighted culverts on Tributary 0302 from their outfalls to the main channel
(right bank of RM 1.0 and left bank of RM Q.95), ,
2. Place large woody debris in the channels of both Tributary 0303 (RM 0.0-0.3) and 0302 (RM I!
0.4-1.2), and
3. Apply local bioengineered slope treatments, such as revegetation, to eroded sites.
WMC Lower Cedar River�Basirr Plan 4-14
Discussion: Capturing the discharges from the two culvert outfalls and tightlining them over the
steep, erodible ravine sides could reduce sediment loading in Maplewood Creek by an estimated
5 to 25%. Placement of large woody debris could help reduce downstream sediment delivery and
could contribute to the general function and quality of instream habitat.
This solution was chosen from a number of altematives; reconfiguring the lower half mile of the
� channel to convey flows and sediment to the Cedar River by alternate means($SOOK) or using
tightlines($SOOK)were rejected because of their high cost and the uncertainty of their
effectiveness. Regional retention/detention ponds were considered for the headwaters of
Tributaries 0302 and 0303 but were rejected because, although very effective, they would be
prohibitively expensive($S,OOOK).
Lead Entity: WLRD
Cooperating Entities: Renton PW
Estimated Cost: $150,000
3123 Maplewood Golf Course Reach Improvements
Recommendation: The City of Renton should replace the two existing sediment ponds on
Tributary 0302 with one designed to allow upstream fish passage at RM 0.35 and stabilize the
eroding banks of the stream above the pond with large woody debris. In addition, the City should
consider enhancement of habitat in the reach that passes through the golf course to facilitate
upstream fish passage and provide rearing and spawning habitat.
Discussion: The improved sediment pond and stabilized upstream banks would not only allow
anadromous fish to pass to upstream reaches, it would reduce the frequency of sediment removal I
with its associated costs and its habitat impacts. Enhancement of the reach within the golf course
(RM 0.2-0.4) would encourage use of the relatively good habitat of the Maplewood ravine 6y
anadromous salmonids.
Lead Entity: Renton
Cooperating Entities: WLRD, MIT
Estimated Cost: $350,000 '
Orting Hill Subbasin
T 3124 Ortin Hill Tributary(030'n Reali nment I
g g
Recommendation: Realign the lowermost reach of Tributary 0307 into a new fish-usable
�� channel and a constructed wetland complex along lower Jones Road. (Note: this could be used
for mitigation for construction of the new Elliot Bridge or other road projects along Tributary
0307.)
4-15 Chapter 4:Description of Recommendations
Table 4-3 Tributary R/D Requirements - Justification by Speci�c Catchment
� Subbasin and Trib#1 R/D Justification Comment
Catchtnent Level
Mainstem Cedar River 0299 0• Insignificant benefit of R/D.Cedar River Appiies to valley floor lands with direct
MS1 through MS15 is a designated receiving water. discharge to Cedar River.Otherwise
� Level 3 applies on valley floor.For
plateaus see BW 20.
Mainstem Cedar River 0299 0' Insignificant benefit of R/D.Cedar River Levei 0 only with direct discharge to
MS 16,MS l 7 is a designated receiving water. Cedar River,otherwise,Level 1
required.
Ginger Creek 0300A 0• Insignificant benefit of R/D.Limited Require downstream analysis to
B1,B2,B3 future development.Less than i0% intersection of Lake Youngs Way SE
increase in future peak flows.No and Royal Hills Drive SE.Small but
significant current R/D in place.No nonzero risk of increased channel
significant current problems.No SRAs erosion.
present.Ample conveyance capacity.
Maplewood Creek 0302 2 Avoid future aggravalion of significant Basin on urban side of UGB.Low
MW1,MW2,MW3 0303 current erosion problems.Protect projected%future forest cover.
recommended 5500,000 channel
stabilization/habitat project.
Molasses Creek 0304 2 Protect SRA stream habitat.Prevent Basin on urban side of UGB.L,ow
F1,F2,F3,F4 aggravation of current stream stability projected%future forest cover.
problems.
Madsen Creek 0305 2 Protect large public investment in stream History of catastrophic landsliding and
M 1,M2,M3,M4,M5, 0306 and sewer line stabilization and LSRA sediment transport.Continued risk of
M6 stream habitat and wetland. future problems.
� Orting Hill 0307 2 Prevent future public expense from Nistory of small problems and drainage
Jl,J2,73 aggravation of cunent stream stability projects to stabilize channel and improve
problems. habitat.Urban side of UGB.Large future
development potential.
Summerfield 0311 0• Regional tightline serves upper half of Approximately upper 50%of subbasin
SUI-upper subbasin. can Ue served by existing tightline.
Summerfield 0311 1 SWDM peak 11ow standard.Adequete Tightline intercepts flow from upper half
SU1-lower given reduction in creek flows resulting . of subbasin.
from tightline construction.
Cedar Grove 0308 ( SWDM peak flow standard.No Some risk of future channel erosion.
CG1,CG2,CG3,CG4, 0309 significant problems or SRAs.
CGS 0310
Cedar Hills 0316A 1 SWDM peak flow standard.
CHI,CH2,CH3-
unmined
`' Cedar Hills 031bA 4 Special design/Master Drainage Plan for Master Drainage Plan process
CHI,CH2,CH3-mined all subdivisions regardless of size.Also recommended for custom design to
known as Large Site Drainage Review in restore pre-mine water quality and
the revised Design Mnnual. quantity that has been radically degradeJ
by mining.
* R/D exemption sub}ect to DDES approval as per Basinwide Level 0 R/D standards.
4-71 Chap�er 4: Descrrptiola ofRecomme�:�latiorrs
� �
. � � ' ' �
..,,. 1 � M� �
/ \
/ \ !1 I
I
. ` � 1 '�%
]' � % ;,_•' � -- , Figure 4-2
a �
j ► i � .
� ' i / _ � % ; ��;� � ;� 1 1 .LGS\i'� �
fi 1 \ .\
� � \ � ��,
��, { "JdSI f� M52 �f�, ' ' j2 � \` � \,_-.`�`. i
/ �: � 1
\
, � /MWL�1 J 1 �, � 1 `\ S'���' � Tributary Retention/ j
- � / � . � MW 3 �� 1 13 V '- f��1 � �� �
�y '`y � ' ' 4 �4' Detention Standards
� ` � � n ��,,,�•
��' —� , _ _- �• �inus�. � r�— ��G�y�� ,l'�
- _.__ ... � � `�ii+ ��� � _ ---_. � ��; �� �__.�7rt59� �
1 �- --= �� for New Development !
-�... M53 � ��`� , `` 1 .. - _� ' "- - ' a
� ) �\/� .�- . ''��` �_ `
� 1'� `` -�� � '_"��� � � Cedar River Basin Plannin Area �
- i� �� Ft � � y� ,;l �� �� \,_ J\ `
, . , `-- MZ , , � � . 9
f2 " ` � Recommendations
` \ ► CH�
- / :� � � i���.. \ �1 � i
� ,: ��„����.< t_�._� �� \ �.\
. i ` 1 M3 � �\ �1`..
�I � � cj��` � ���) � , AA6 1 ` `t` =�,� � � � � l
'�P\```` �;�����.. �\ � �_ ` � �� _� ♦ � i �,,
.. . ���' � � �. � �r ,r �\ . ` � .. � -� � � � ._� .
. � � �� � / PQ � � ��_ t
fd 1� AU \ M5�`; 1 t � W4 � ` ' 1
a ,� ♦ � 1 I � � ,�,�„� . �^"�,�'� t1' 7 � K � �, `�'� '`
� r--�� �i � ; �• �twar v. ' 'i
' � ' i �i` - ; . �%_ � � � .1 . „� v� _ � .`9`..� �.� ' ,� � _- , ' �� Sheam �
j �. � ` r �` ,,�"'�a� �� \ M510 � OV� �3� � � ` �` �
't �♦ /
' � k�� , �\ ; ,- `� PS �+�' ..P,1� , ��` ��.- ��_;.� �, i T' � �� ` ; , �� lQke/R�er �
- � ,'�'t ' m ' �
�i _ -`�� <,���t � i`�•� �� !. � - - - r� m� � _ , '. �:--a Wetland
' - ' �,, . � �i �.F�.;-�� i I � � r �� � � ' _ ` , , � ; �
i � - . _ � oz � +.�s�i_ �� / , '_ _ - #
� a,r� , > .;}��r'_.`"��, ��,__i' rs ) ��� �3 . ' �../^ BosinBoundary 4
a i . MS ' �C ' �
' I, �—�� ` .-vo"� `� � �. ` � � �� •s _ _ `' _" `_ ���� Catchment 8oundary f
_ , - � � ` '. �'"` "� - `�� � =�i�`� � - � � MS2 Cafchment Nvmber
�
� / l �Y-
i` � ^PI 1 \ -
�` � , ii �C` . . ` ,w{2, - ri 1 , , `
_��� � . !E.'�.,� 72A � te j� . � 1 \ � i i
` L
I ' ` T2 �l�\ I �\?� `�.� ` / ``' Y` :
MS13 � �` � �I �.. �Ya J. � - ..� � - �� V �� �. �
� ' . ���r� �Lc�-`�"�..� � '�_ ,nn.e`, ,.'� . '/i _/ �� ���`` �a � Leve10 �
I i �-:� ` �, , ♦ �--, -_ . �'- � �
; ��y J�, _Mvs_♦; Mva� �� � ,.- �i� � � �• level 1 j
� ,�. . ,
'`'�� � .� ,,• "��-���.�.�
i � � �� ;. �,�y� � � � . �r;'�v,:�i �._.--`� �6Ve�2
� / � ����+.�,�- f\.�.i����wtt�•�i
�� i � �i Level 3
+ ��
� e+su ._ � ' � ==-^t�
� � 'Hs�� � — , __ ^ � �.�.5.' level 4
i �
i �
� � _ �
: � �`�-��� �` �� i
' � �` i �` `� �`�
1 �,� ` �
�� i= �� � Ms�e Y _ �'`� NOTE: Refsr ao Chaprer 3 for �
• ,�'�`. � :�-` ,-i,. . more detaited mops and infamotion.
' �� �� � � ���� �
� _ �'�R2 �\�� t `� �,�i 't f / �
l � � _ �I ,
� /
1 /��� � R3 ������ �
� � / ��_��..�� . �
� 4�����
i� �ti � 7
9 � �'`� `•✓~ •� N i
i � �x,:...,� �
� / ^R5 � a, 46����.��..�
•1 '�^.'� �
`�� i�
; � \ `
\
Programmatic Recommendariau � i " � j
{ � BYY 1 q .Relenr,�+,/L�eqsr�kon S�.dords I ,��� 0 1 2 Mias j
! � fevel!:CH i.CH2.CFt3la ihmMed Arecs i I � � i
�� !
tevei�!:CN i.CN2.CN3(«eYx�cd Areas � �� j.
BW 20 Raare Ro�crion Sandord � ;� i a� � ' � 4
� Plalew.lreos,NS Cakhrenh i �` 1 p^�'�'�, Map produad by: �
j ��+': � � � g �'� Yisual Communication i GIS Unit, �
�`" -`✓��, O s Public0utreach5ection
i W8 1 x<y�.�~ 9Wi�Ma.TI11MSTDSF211K {,
� ' i
#�
#�,.,,_ . .�---- .��«. . .,»..��-��- . ..gr.:h�-��..,.-.,�...,�. ,�, - _,
-_ . -z�.�,���-�--.a.�.,-.��-�--�_�,-.�-T-.�.�, -_._.���.�.. ,.._� - -- -� .� -�. ..--,t �.�.-�-
._ _.. --.._._ --_ ._r_�� __- ,.._.e - --�
.�--�-_: .. . . .__ -:�.._,. .�-,.. .: .._.. :. _�_,--.,<: � .- . ._ ... _ .�..._.. . .._. .. _. ..._--7a-- _.�__. . _ _ ._ .!
Appendix B
Downstream Drainage
Complaints
23 October 2014 I
TO: File I�
FM: Craig Hislop, P.E.
RE: Drainage Complaint ?006-0081 Close
Back�round:
Mr. Close reported a landslide in Tract A of the plat of Hideaway Home Sites to the west of his
property on or about the 16 of January 2006. I left my card and a door flyer at his home on the
17. I left a telephone message on the 18 when I did not hear from him. He returned my call the
evening of the 18 and again the morning of the 19. When I spoke with him on the 19 he told me
a King County employee by the name of Paul had stopped by his home and looked at the slide.
Mr. Close told me that Paul had not been concerned about the slide. I spoke with Mr. Close
again on the 25 of January and received permission from him to access the slide area through his
property.
The Close backyard rolls from a relatively level surface to a gentle slope. Outside the fenced
yard the ground surface continues roll steeper. The slide appears to be completely within Tract
A as shown in the recorded plat. The landslide is generally made up of the top two to four feet
(2'-4') of surface material. There appears to be a horizontal clay layer with a pervious layer of
free draining soil on top of it. I saw no further evidence of cracks or other movement outside the
immediate slide area. The top of this slide is approximately seventy five feet (75') horizontally
and twenty five feet (25') vertically from the Close house and does not seem to present a danger
to the home.
The landslide is approximately two feet(2') thick at the edge and forty feet (40') wide at it's
widest. It slide to the bottom of the drainage course and blocked the creek until it was
overtopped by additional flow from the creek. There are broken trees, branches and root masses
at the bottom of the drainage channel. There is a significant amount of sediment that has been
washed downstream.
I walked both upstream and downstream from this slide. Both directions had many additional
slides but of a smaller nature that also contributed sediment to the drainage channel. The slide
areas could be easily identified by the gray wet soil with little or no vegetation. There was also
soine evidence of channel erosion due to high runoff flow.
There were a number of outfalls from previous development projects that were in a state of
disrepair. It appeared that most of the outfalls have not been inspected or inaintained. I found
leaking and discontinuous pipes that have been discharging and incising the highly erodible
slopes. There where also some poorly designed outfalls that allowed runoff to discharge directly
onto the slopes. Whether the discharge on the slope is accidental or purposeful it has contributed
a considerable amount of sediment to the channel.
23 October 2014
2006-0081 Close
Page 2
There is one location where an eight inch (8") �;-ater service line has now been completely
exposed. The runoff eroded the channel material around the pipe and has now piled mainly
organic material against the upstream side of the pipe. I will attempt to contact the owner of the
supply line and inform them of the current condition.
Where this channel meets with the greater Cedar River channel the City of Renton has
constructed a sediment pond to catch the majority of heavier sands, gravels and cobbles prior to
the creeks flow across the Maplewood Golf Course. This facility appears to have done a very
good job of stopping the transport of sediment further downstream. It does appear to be nearing
its capacity for holding sediment though.
Recommendation:
I recommend a repair of the outfalls contributing erosive flows to the sides of the drainage
channel and removal of the sediment in the City of Renton's facility.
'� :�� ����� g^� �, � r ,! '' r-e
A � f ti� �
( � iF4 , '`.l�,,M 'i� �i t�'i.} �a! �.a4 �� .! 4. S
. F�� .����L'~. ,•^�R7P � .. a: . `� � _:� •� � '�t
s� h _���. :'b ., � �?��.:bP k�'s,� � •:!i � � ; �4�lAa�r�4� '"=�
� . �Tij 'S` ��� .��- a �, .. �,r �i�c `$ : y�•�� st.
(� <'�i° y�• �° �t �.y f t�
'' � ����1�t�t.• y �'� ��'1-8 .�+�s.W ��.�.I � -� `.l � � "�} t +��.. ,�_�
i � `�� �a• '` c � �_ � `4,`'
�!• I ,y.w ,S L t . �� '� kr�;, t �} .�.-� -
C.,�-; ` ,�`��� -,I� �J"•t��. �`; '•`} 4.��1�{�'��� �� ��� /' � ����1i'••"F�\�� _
i, � ��,'.74� �: s+"'K r. _ i : l
-�,:� `� ' t +i a §
•,. „ �
` Y L f
�.n? `y'y )� .� 1 ..
� j� h ��' ��� ' fi `�����,a��r t����la��'� '�
�- � a �!kct t���tM . ..1�''.3�� 1.�.4" . . . ars,j•�f 1 •� 'e � �� � � r . e�3A
-L�� r .. �,.� ..� �e f
y _��Tf � i r.al>'�ic"k vs-�-� t=> 5-"3' 4-.. `�� �F„��� � .'` .�
�� �' t�, - << r . s .�� �i , �' �,��'�,
'fs�� �#` `�� • ^F�k � � r`�� - F`` t� �t�` ��
f � ��,~ �1� �� c���� � ��.a�•�4 :-r,. 3rt • �k
�� < Y� r°i'S'-
* , ' . . -t.' _ � ����r 'w 6. � � `�� `�' 4�V:. s e' . _
: �
.
.
,, ' i �. • . �� �j
; : . t... . � � -� ., �-- � �..
/F -� �.. �-� �i�EY]�����
. . f,, a w . � � '• 4`�'�?r •.. . .,ti•��, -- - . 'e. " � �t � _ .` "`>'--. .
_ .K-�,,�7�i � � �•�a.t ,qF. ' y'' � � �:.r �s��� ��» Jv. . �.�af . -��. • ' -�
*�yel � � f�r ::...�� -. .� .� ��--r�,--y�.� �. - {��-r.�,,:', ,��_-
� .f�. `� - -'-J` �� r.. � .� ---' 1�"`.� - - a��`" ti - -'�C�,
i� �'� �i��''a►�� '` ;"r- 2�.• R' ,a � �� „-_ ",� ...�.� . �► : �
.-e�-� � � g� a� ` -
� 1•, 4 � � �t �4T�' 1 `� �. �''t;
�f��_�
`' �,���,`�.F '�i,� �;ti C�,� � �.��..�' �r����, - ��
1�- r ,�,.�� �,��9``���,,,,,'`���yLL , } `��t�` � .� := -•�. � �-; ;
.�, .� _h� "1 A'y, . a .+j�g.` !' „ ., � . ' s^� z* `Y�4,� ��-j ��.
`�^ -�i. � , ,•�y�� ¢� . :�' � .iF� _� �j �_�, s's'/ •�'1.-.�.'
_� n•�'� .'� f,�Y �'. �,/q - +c �-a ,e�'�,� -"�7w��i�< ..��r �' i� � t�-_ .. .�
�� .��4�'' � �' ��? _ a� � �'If� 7' �i.�y �aaAs •
��q't�b . �.�.a� �. �4. �� "� . . ' 4:
�A� � .�.,n. � T�r .'S'�� i. � � -'��c....�'�.�_J � � ���..s .' '��
�• � _ y'���Cl�.,� -t-� _�--`�������� .`..:�
Photo 1: The landslide behind the Close property �vithin Tract A of the Hidea�vay Home Sites.
23 October 2014
2006-0081 Close
Page 3
a � K�����`_ it � �j�����\i���(ti�-� �N�a �t��� ..�s - .,� .
, ��`� ��3i •r-� � .� �' ,'�~ yr.� �k f
r n v..:.� ,,,� i �M1 �� R-� � .:i
�'_•,� �:�� f' � +i+�i,ri .l� a.. ��r
� ,�o �� t; `i' �yyl+ •�^ - � �. , ��� ` � ,�
.5� -�•��,�T,+- {��-\._. �SS�" ._:3��'7'S 'd i ` I .+ �
i $ � �� T --- � �^� ,�.:}��
�� ��`� y -.1:�-!���'�� .����.'�,T�-., '"�; d�-a�f �r��Z�, '
4�` ,�: > .. i' ..•������+ .,' � �,,. � `��: � ��
�.. � � �_l��" i- �.t��.e"'`R��x.,3\� �� yaC:- .�� �tI .• 1 ���'Y
r r, s `� xl.r � �i 7 � �' y ��`
f #= iw � � � ��.�•t +�,;��� .F
P
k,�+,�.�y��!r� ,,���w�� �� ����.__.,_;y,� ; ����.,y����
_� _�,�,� .�_. •� '�-, �''' ,� �.�
� '°,��. ,s ' � :�`� �_��;.
_��� •�i; ��e �.� -�?�'�,�;��,� k �'' .;��` "' `'�
r �
S . \`d ...� AG't �y� &a ►:f-,-.2='e - �L�
°�.'1'`'��'�' r . i !--`-�t.
V � ����Pe*=.Js- �':� i��r' t - � ��
'i. �' J. _ ���' 'f '+'��S+i►;� ,,�. .��
`-"����„�.���y 4 }
��� _ -- ~���4� !t�.
� '� ts� t, � `-`�-l�i�i3
4:a S��'ys.��,�
t �`` �.�rQ ����,i�
4_ �� ,�'=r� �:�rr , �Y.�'i'�,;;�► ;.
'� j, �'.:-Q , �_ ���
�, � _ �.
Y �� v �� F� 7�L
. , . _w..�;1
Photo 2: The landslide debris in the channel and its course now.
� . , � r,
, ,
I '� � '��:
�,i„s,5 � -.��+� e,,;,,•� �
r !
�r� � A
�S l�,7f.-r,��''ii �' t�, ,,� r
� �;�`' <�dt'�;;4� ���� t'e
s.
.:,;Y=�j� ,R: +� ��'�. 4 s�.�,
•�i�1�'��`ti��M�l�����r�F� :i� ��'_
. ,,./ ,� 4 *y.' r y�„SY,� �4i�a, ,
�.K.'.!�� .;�X\."w `�*`"��.41�"q�1' f'"\� ' ,p�'� � �:}t�
i` � ,::r � -�.
�� � t J �, ��?�,')
' �'. w ;� ., r �t xiY"' '� t >`,�i
� " -���. .f! `k+�Y� � � �` . �i�Z'1:��'f
� +�� �: �'s i -.�'
y,►y, ,��;7"'�, ;�+` �.. F.
. � �� -��y� � :: .� :a
;�:�}°� ..��_a .yp �L �,.e��•.�t �-: r'`�.' : ,'
� ♦ ,� °_ .�
��t� y`" _. ,} �r " ."� •::, �„�.
ik � ti 7"r i� , �:.
��,rc fK y� w ����� `��� �v �,,,
��,� �' -� - ., ti � �. a� � �w:
� ; ,�; � �} � i �1 �..
, �twte 4_,�j.�,Y !a� Y � la �+.�� �f 4�
N i � �RG�� `� ti.:� �`t�`��� �i-•g�'�Sk�? . . .1
ak
� �: .�,tL,��7 v <�t F ,� >�n J�i�.ji
�
.�i �'�.,r �
�� t�' � �;.�"'
a' ,�4 w.k
�: „'�o �� _t,a�c`A�;��4�.� ���� a�n,��,r •�!;w
�. �t.�{`� '�� �-.�.. • �!� �'`.'.
t +' y�'�l
. .v� ��� '� t� ti�'.';� �: �:�,�•`•1�►���,- �
, 1 �.
rr�• �`r?�� � � k '���� ':� � e
a r ,s�� ;,�,,,�rK� >..� �a
� J ,��1� ^,Y i �
I �Y �
�. A�A '�r �'r �'
�� '�i'.i,c.5�i
' Photo 3: Typical of other landslides in this drainage course.
23 October 2014
2006-0081 Close
Page 4
;�
<� ~�
�v \" '
�� rii,
�,�` �t
t;;;;%�
;�• � � �^ ' ��� �
,� '�'�'�.., 4.�' � �
� xN�� ,'� ` ���
( " 9�, •
. � . � ` ��`�'�� �4� � •���
�} , �� ' � � ` . l� /1 _ •
� `4 T'� l i# � `� �
'4 { �t� �. . �:. w., r-. :y�-l��Y. i"F 1 s f f
��� �r ��,a,� M 4�� _ t _ .�- p�'� � ;:T ' -:'� -
�A '�ya'�i �+7`� � t _ . � �,''�. � '�} _ �- ��
��•�K . v _ M .� - '�}y 1 ��,
V j r�. �r
+���.i,Y�. 'Ec `_� Y ��[.! ,1.
�. „� i �4'-- � �. _ . .fi'r , � ,��. _
_ i
�•.:. �
`'.A ... . y . �.� �. A -, � f
, �.�+�,,� :�t,,�;+F.�._ � _ _�' � , �CT� �.•'_r
�.•. " ���d,,, �� �,,,�s' � �/ '�` -
L ` 4 � � �.. ��� �•��f^� � �,
3�
t` �_ �.�,#�'t F,t, �' _ .�,r-�_ J. � '�,,�
k. � , �-� _ �} . - � , :�
� �.+'7...(� '♦ ~� S{ �S Jf� �� ���
�: '1� s�:' �a,• '�`'t,+.��� �s�'� �'� -;�-•�'�.- '3` `• h�k,'
_ �:. . .� � , �,.� :
.4 ' , �
� ,._ � g
��� : .�.;`'� . iYi'''`-r..a-� � '�,r'��
"+ `'.i::a. � .t.., . ✓= � � � ,�.'
�.�-,�• ��^�-t�''v�'��,
� ` �-
_ . �R;lc.`�a '';
f'Iww -�: Dischar�;c at the intersection of 138 Avenue Southeast and Southeast 136 Street at the
top of the slope contributed to this erosion.
N
O '
z �
�
0
.�
.�
0
�
�
3
0
Q
�.
a�
�
"��"�4� ����t`�� ����jt'� ,r� ��� ` 1��� i
+R.,�x9,'°�J' 1s1i�`,� ij" �p�, �a�"'� N
�'' �A � �r�i��Qt�`,������d S� S, -, "�
�,I��l. 1'e ����� .�4�' . Q
y,v, �`��f.�� �-,�1��"''����(j'�,yt O` � 0
•�*' w .�. �''4�4`'��i�bUk��,'�� .. ;l �
a�v�,k� � +,^*�.in . �I� T t i ��..r�,�b�- 1 �
� M . "� �1i�, ;� �, �,�1, �^"ifi�i fl��r^/,f� � � �.D
w �' ' � �'�5� {�1�i. 1� O
'� t+�i.. '�" � ar" ►i,•g.� � �
`�� '.°"+�y'` "��4;."«�+,t� �'
� * �� `�� ` i� �" 4.
1 � k 1 8u;+ v � � � f i r
� h; ,� * �����';`:"' y�� ;.*� +�,�;�O � f� 1j►���!'@°►N� �_ �!�,,v.'J•lyl��. '��' �� ��~�-7{, C
��P� � � '� i� '�� �I! t"���'.�. '`. b�ti�. r �K7..�+e. i{ ���.�^ ��`w �� � y�/ � 'f ��
,�.�ti. � . i .}�`�'�t•i�,�i�l�' . •;4'' �' � 'Y�N ' "' ��.F, n�����. ►'.F� !� ., 6 I,�``y �j �r,� �. �
' '%CS-. M ;-r ' � !' 1 � � ,r . r�v • v���aa�� ��. !f� +R� ,+116�in �,;." r� r � I� ��� CC
. .., . � ' ��
�'� �,�,.�NY��,'�x� 3 vx; M�!4� k�. �,., q;a...��y ��+A �ti �+�,`l�. � ♦��!•�/�y'�� � �.a,� �
. , ' 'H � ������..,� '��V�.� �A"���'� ,�'���y ' � �, 41��'��� "� '1M�/ '9'�,�����r�,���� !�
1 � �r
(�{ � ���''�,�f'� � ,y� � �; K
�.�'- .�; .., ..-� . � � ,� ,..�T,N���. �. '' {�� > .ar��� ����t%.`' �' ����� '�. '����'.����.�►'��}c'�N��'r ' �•���. ��¢� �`�`�., �
i. � � w s • a Fp.
�,.� ,�,* "��°� t �e. `a�4 r�� :►:����'A+�1ty�� , o-�;�".� ;e i s*+ �"s�" �`�A�� . "t�e�, , �
� �a �� _ �.� •��'i��� .., ..�� ;:'R� �
f , `��;e�,� � �c`y'rh :,;. p �` `.+�' `a' '+1� � k�' �s� ",' b� r�A��yf .?" d ?�. ..,D�.
, ' , �f� ,+ z11 y �,acY'�-L r �� • �,..J� c i
� `�"' � � 'r� "�. '�'1 a "}3�� ��+, �'� ��r'.. � � rl��1 � .�
� . . :. . '�� � . . �.`!'"'�S� "'�'. 'f �w1'. ��',..-. . 'Yt�� J+7��, * ';.�. . t� ,�" � �;���i ��'��� �.�+
' O r' ..
� ` . 1� '�.: 'a, � O �. �� �'��i��,> `_ as�i;� + . i xw" t . .��;� �� c�
ks����� ly..�< w � , � 1 � � ` ���� 8��.4 � ` .�'; /.i �j' -b
`. A�F �- . ti� � ..�- �, '�� �, �i, �,,���,,,, r, ✓��'t; a � �
;,f;' '; ,�. ' _ a:+`r� �^f +� '�+ ��+ •�?; <'�� r�y�. ay�'„310, 0.� '�� *;:��, '� ' �,,
� :"� � ." �tg ' '`Q+ .,g. �,Ae :i',I' �,�i.! r t�� �r a r �� �
� "�'°�"L * . t: { .., �,k�4� x '�� � �;.�I ' ��i+ '��s► w�eir_a=���dil `�1�?+�4`.H�`.�".Kr�N�D'E���a�AfU+� f:�. O
}4�'" �� 'u��� y ...y � . . ^�A k r l' ,t � �'�i R3 tl ..��� ,��,� � 's ��,.' ,;���r{., �e+�t,��� ,, �p�... {;�� �
,�,a�►.....`.�.c�rt �\�'� ��r ,�+ete �ad � ..��+ ������ i.�„ .� � ° �, l r..`'�7 °ri �. 1� dt+� �i'7°r���,;•s•�y�'�� � c�
C. 'S�'u kY',, � � '� M1 !�,�y Za / � a�` (� x .�q ��/ i1`.r�1�4 `¢'���,��d�l�''�;� .����� ��, ��,�7r�� � �,;'.. ��..�
,r � � �I
-+!�'� �,:� C4� �.r�`�:���� ��i •�� .yl�+"o .. � � a�1 ; f �'�S? � � a4 N � '��j11.�� 1 � ySiqi�P����� `+;.'+�, N
a„ � � �h.a {. � '�'"� alt "�{+� �� �`,� e .: 1''�'i bA
J'r '�`
•. '�. , 1 ` "���i +' � ' � � � � „y,= r' �.*s tf � � � , , wv,a� '� �.
rt J ti�y � � �,;M h d' �4� �., � Cd •i$p,;�'t Fp►�+y , '� ' ; 7. ,�,v.. „ �`�� f��/ •�� --' � ii� �Lt�';, d x�.M RS
"�F P t� 4 :+�t� ry � Li.. '� p,. � r f/�.t@ , +� '�,��
O ,� ��,�' �` 4' ur*� v� 3e4 ,. ,�y� �2 5 ��'�+y i�I�lh�i'CS -' P.a\'�IF }'� y; � .S;
QN `A'r �� q ,!`��l�ti � �+ « b.Xi1h�=�RM1�:`�' y "i,+���.�C`�C't��,e '�� „�' �`"'� �1 'gY��w'M .t„� -1�� r"���'p�r�.���� �
� U f°,�;`� t� �"`' ��'yy�r""' E-� �4{�' �i�" Y',,;r` °��� ���S�;QaL�¢� 'ir�"� ,;y� 'd�"y�"r�f,�,�1 .� L1
•� �Mr _
M � �
V � ♦f�W Y 1 .7�, i y:'� y1 "�
# �� ,t++'
� � il� fi,�j� +. I �, � . ��� h«n!!s � w( � � $5�� .i `��� •�'� ��'�� `��
p • �`+'� � �fe ��i/ .l � � •�� �;,ro
� e' .. . .� �� ��f�1�. ��x yr .f �� r.- �' �����v� _��
0 , ( - � f��
�
�
.i �' >� �
T I ��
� .�.. /� /I- .
U 1 .ya�t/��v � ��• �.'�• �l• ,+��5� .�;^ .4.f, �� ��fir+i.�,i,i �Y��� �•` (y��((7�� �� _
�O � J/""�� . 1� "�_J., ,t.�!'•�,,•, �.\..� � l .W�"� �+����i./I'j��� �I `ti' O
� � GA � O .� S��Ir'A ► f `': �✓i � •...-�� k�$� '�' � O
N N Q. �Q. .^�1�;�4�.`�'�.���'l�f��� ��d,��:� ��!�.~�" '_,��h'ry1Ml�'4�'�..� ti ., �I p�„�
�
U
[�
a
�
��
0
C7
�
0
�
�
0
P �?', 'T �3�4��, i�"'.�;,1i�C'R F'�::��`"j��e r^ . ;�"�,��'ep�►�'�'�j,� 4'�-.
/ ° i�r
' � �Iy�, �F�*p�,� �� Rqt�� ��`��i �� � st ���Y��yy �
u �y�/�iP-s�i. �� w'`� r� �'��� '�),� . ,�h l � � � ,i
,�y `7 . a t�y�.. 10. �nl�i `��4.:G� �l •����I �
n
♦�� *�,�. �.���^�,,i ;.1,it,��,�y�'����r,��. r����'�.�i'�r,�y,r� '!�:.�`' ��-�~��. (�
'wry� .y �{I +�. >� rak 7A��u'� s�.f��� ��i'� -� ;�',j�.�--''r'4 "� " �
�°�}��.v� ') �,.�4S�r�� r.,��"'�e'E'� __ � 'JE� . �_,��.�—. l' � a ,�� , �'�, �.; Y
� � �7'
^'" * �-11' '���e.., . � J,I,�=py'A �'�M1 ip �3 ".T�4", � � �� 4 �
•�y�i��C�4 �r+�r, �� �r j ��r�"�',�� " y '"_��; �a"� "� c�
v{� r � .;�� �"�":���+"y �1� .�r�,a,,"%� �S�r'f �
s a .�, � �,� � �, ..,
�`��•'�� '�y�.a�/�1w��~r � q���7 ti y, � J��Af/ V•a O
"��i �R /}� „!L.w.i ,i�yl� �{.�� / �; �� , � ,n
�;'. !��:.x a� a�� � q.'a�, , .
�,t 0.v*--_ �N�'y'� �/� �� -.a i' ���iy•A -,�ud �,. Q�
�4 r1� � ��� ,��J�'� , '�F� .
� . ..�l�,�.ri'�� .f P�� �+ ���.. sd' ,..�c.'. �
Y y d��
}_,•C��F ) �,�]�+ ,��, .� r '�///�f���;y�. ; ` �i• . �
+i�,n'+.c- ,4�R+ Of ,� -y �,,.
',�, ♦ .�' �.� ,� tY� '. �J . �. .�
;�a :t� ` �; � d ',� �� � 3 � ,�,�'
,�F w �, �� �,� +�� °'
���` ,�{� {� =
� GJ 4�y" t "' �'J` �, �¢�•,?�i �� , �'� �� � � 1.+ � �
N
y i{ ,..�. ..'ry � r ,�,j , � y•/,y��� ti .�
� � } � �1y 1,. �15� . ,�'� ,�¢ �!,r r�a'l yi_rt ;� ,', � . 1 � U
/ � � �yy y. a.. / ,�e .��� ,�r �� � ! , ��� V7
CV V �- �.'�� +^ �����1...�,�*�a" .`� �,,�.�,klypJ f •�� � •�
Y, ,�,, e,.
� ,,,� . ?�� d v f ��'.' { R �g t W�r ya t . � �c� �]
� y "T' • �
� O �. f��`' , �� ���;���,'t ������y� x;,
O � ��� ���,,�:` . � � {r,. �,c 1' k� C�
� �
O , � � , .�. , -�'-•���y >f�1�r t� 1; !6 0
o b�A � �' 'r� `t �f i • 5 �.� ,.� .s
��:.�y..� r �. 4��iP��M�r�, � �
M O C� - '1! . r n�*.yd+����,�1 'E��#�\1'''�e. � a
N N (�. 'I - . . . �,`�i�ii��' .!Y� �.. � �".!�r� .� _.,. , � . .:.,.�
23 October 2014
2006-0081 Close
Page 7
�������'�'.�'".����'� __
� � �.�, �
�����=�-�.—�..
���,��,_ �:'- ,c ,..�-,_x,.r--
k*
'Y_
f
t v�Z
.N. ,` .
� r
_ �~ �'� �� r
�.� v \
�� ` `
*�
� .�p�C.', � �_ {�<;..,.�.
�' - ��' ��G�-w. ��'�`�:
��� - �: e�i - � ..
�A:.
I^�. ,�i� ��r
a�`�� �� �.� . `�
��gY.'y '� '�
����, `�
� ��� 1
�,�X,!'�'���
�
. +�. �+ `';�•4
:i�..� � ,6�.w= �. . ��;-�- f�,---�w 3,,��\:.�q
. ,�� _ _ 4_ .... . i��
�' � - ..�K(�,F�?j�:�
#"
ss
i � L.� 1 I Iil `'�.�
�.
� r� -
, ?6•
Photo 8: Exposed 8"water main between Fernwood East and Goe's Place.
� :�� �„i'�..•� F t -r�t r.i�� _ ...,,
.� ��y , . • �� �. � _ • `�
� ,- � _ t4`t•` '�' a' ... 't
�Cap,�1�i .. ~ .�l. �.t k.� � ��� �.ts�'1�y;;�,'� ��a'r
r
� •�.,.,,.., � �.� �yt� �K ...i�. , /
� s�y.' f�t � S ���; ��i�ic
�:�j � "� r lw
\ r. •
`�'t : � - „F �,�� .
..,_� .. �"..
,Y,. �°tl�'��E �r .l ty�-� ��` �� �{ f .�,� ��,�,.
. ' � `� F , z�� „� .
� '�� �.. �' ¢ -:� �7j � -__� �jii '��` :`��+�a } �i
V. �1 � A' `�� _�i�
_ �_ . . � �� �� � 7.. �. � r �.
�i` . �� t' Y: '.�.' . �� 1
���~a r � q '}+' -e.�'"�r � � ~'� {�. ,f^� �
' �{ �{'#�--:+,' 4 '� .� � ��'.+.
..� 4 _(�" ` � �/ � ?,
�� �� *+�' '�I/ ,�� �+�
, �,:�.t+ ���.I �.`���� � �::�
. . ". � .� J.? i, �� _
. _' � k ' �C:� f- 'J��� �ht'�a.-, r
.Y i�w'`� i' ��• - +` ! .r-� �
`��"a'� ��,�F"�'�d'7� �"�'�-� ��� `f� � f�.��y.�
F.r�r ij }l,F� ��� ,y� .� .. �'.�
. �+ � G � . �:!�� �` '
�� ��1�� €�-'' ��� �-�•� . t`"�, r��-�`'--Kl�• �� �s
'a �i - � � '�C _� - � r��`� . .�y�
� �+ r� 'R '� �'� � �.'q�
�''�• � •�i� ��� ..ryft"'1' �' �*-u .'�:���� �� j�¢^; � .��
� �� � !� �r �. ��`�`� Y � '� '
y � �,�n# �4� g������ .� � �p ��
�- ,`'._'{it�1�Y��lt�fii7t��'!'Y�'�`"i��_ i.� �.. _ �-'�=�'
Photo 9: Discharge at the south margin of Lot 31 of Heather powns Division No. 2.
-a�s��.�;-.T y,, � � ���r ��; �o�`�`��d► '��
. • ', ` r .� ,, Y s 'L" r.
. � . .. . �.y� � 1.�. �F �
�„ �� .§� .rKi.. . � . . . � A�� A� _ ���"�J J ���"��, _,
( J ti�+ � Sal :� , "� ,�,•' �� ,� �r ��
� , �� A � ��� m � �,r
� �li.�� �d . A "�i.aJ�l �{� �" . ��'• �..� ' 11��31�7� �>�t�;'3 '� .
� � �, ' �S3,1" E ` � � :� ,{ X '4:
. 4��. ' 4_"� ..+..� i _,�Ir��'�,�� f�• A" . .+l'ct� 3, ;��� �`
�. l,,r,,. �,� I�y l,.l.v �^�R Yi�iV�� 1 _iry,�i,- r4 f�+�, yJ' •
, {, ' � �b_r4�, � i �''r^<`v..;',��, �.r r �.. �+�j�,vw'�,�'�
'�'— �y ,� I �t �. 1� i.e� 'a ' +,Mk•��. ��yN:{y'��:.,
� � , R1 �� �
p ' � �' ��7 k� �`i � �� '� �,r.; t �;!����
� � ��.�.�y 1'Fj`� �1 `1ef�i.�y;� `� .�. s y 'F� rr. �s� �
r♦ J t .. 'g Y ,�'� ' ��' i�'� �i .�_1�ti.�i
� R'�:��,r f"A'Y(rC,yEji � �Y ,'�. yM'� eP+�? �
�I,. . Z�.,.;�! ir '�' . i'7:. . :ti�i�`."'�t'� �:�r r�
. • ��p ♦� '=y����1.t.` M1 ,r'� �{��., t � `�*1.��f�K T��
�, '' . .�r����A� 9.. l r1�.�y.� � .� �� 4�� �.' � ������ ��'�+' ,�
,I � .`K 1�'� ` r�Ni r�) . ,�i �l ` y ` f � '� �:�
a ""�{ � ��" ����
; ; v � 1 � � P x �. ��� c.�
�' � �.� �$,,r� � � � ►�, �� ��,, � .r�r1 x �; �
� w'+�,,�7,�{�� � �� ��w ti'"�� i ��' e ��J� �'P�„�, �.Mi- � +.
� ►-! •1} �;�,.x i . '� ,�
. � ' � t�.,'������ �i aa�,.�� n�� �� �,, '+� � �+.� �
� ��,�,.�1 �r , � ��r. ��_ � � � , �',: d� ,� � - � ti
' a�R�,. , ` ,��i�,�rl�^� i ��� "'''� �� }{ti�.,{ � ���h.. � '�,` .:.;, ^
„r `y�K�." ,�,,,, � � �`^��t a �� ��.y��M%Y4��T .���i � „N�M�r �..i-� V��, � +��
t ���'s � o�.�, r F � . . � '� 1`., � �5` �,I �' �! �3�k'.,' r ��, �
'a. ��, '� y�., � . � ��A '°i ��� �' t !. ,�t Y - � � 1t���� i �r�� v1
+"': '�,y i � � �!` i:,Y � � e�y•,,//
�r +� �' �.� � 1 .{��,4 � Y f, Y,�r���19.'+r4�4,y�� .i T'f '.'�.
,e�P''. � �t r � .�';. � �, °
�R, � � �i �: �i � �' , �u'�+i , ��� " � � ���'��'��.�� ePq��� ' � o
# F � r ; t } �
�-�r,kF�� � ' .
�-�' t ��� F �.� �� ''���,� nrf��+'�, �✓S' � ��� '. 1 ,r JL a��t� i�� '� � �'r 5,�°�S. ti
� � r �.,�. ��� '�`,����; � ° ,R�+' '�'������ �r��� �+`��t��{�+�'�� ��',,, � �' �
ry ,
w.;�a � 'i � � ���t ����'� ��� '� a� ,.�{( C .�h�����^� ,�`�x, fi\ � f�' �� 'r-.�
' ♦ ;� ,�}����f��� 4 O
� •'Y. '�. '` I �Y� I
1 I -�, �tj�ti fr^� ��( ��!,7T�� f,aw ��� Jl
� � ,r '(. }r �:'6:c,,t , ' . �i�.M'C a ��;�. -�.- .�
� .�, � .y,,.:
r�f. � � �� � w � �'
s
�� ',�� i � t° '�Y�.;, �. . � ��, y�1� � a.. � J
� �. a! c i � 9: �x���� . . w' . f 'l ��,$ 4 ��Y�,
, .,� , �, ,� � �, � �., 4 , y �, ,� �� _,
�-. �' A . * ,' , _
� � ��;.� �:� _,.. .��� � � ��� ', ' � �,,�, w� � ;,� �_�`� .�
0 0 � � � �,�.�� .. � n�� .s � „ .�,x,`�,?��� >: .�; b
N (� � ��`��;. " ?r, ,�:. � y� ,. �, C
i ..� ;q�,,,;,,, ..s.�•., fa� .� �: i.. ;, ,'t �N s �, �s
� � w •. �� �' : : ' . , b � ..;'� ��� �i I �
p O �� .A� i� v � ti �1i �o P � ' � ��
V � � � ' , .� �I� ;�� ! � �P'�"� � t�D! �A O
� p bA � t�� *�Y,' �, `� � ��� � � , y � � � �a�', �� O
c+� o � � �� � ;�' �.j �� � :�' ��.�w` '�'� a
c� c�1 a r .t`.,:V;. . „ �•ti�» � ' ,., . _
May 22, 2012
RE: MAPLEWOOD CREEK STORM OUTFALLS
The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention the deteriorating condition of
three stormwater outfalls that discharge into Maplewood Creek just upstream and
north of the Maplewood Sediment Pond and Golf Course that are located within
unincorporated King County and the City of Renton (see enclosed vicinity map). The
three outfalls labeled Outfall 1, Outfall 2, and Outfall 3 originate from conveyance
systems that begin at the top of a steep forested ravine along the south and east
boundary of Heather powns Division No. 2 (see detailed vicinity map). Heather powns
Division No. 2 was annexed into the City in 1977 pursuant to Ordinance No. 3143.
According to King County record drawing G-146, the outfall designs were approved by
the County in 1962 (see enclosed drawing G-146). The portion of these conveyance
systems within the Heather powns subdivision consists of buried pipe and then
transitions to an at grade tightline system anchored to the slope. The buried sections of
pipe lie within the jurisdiction of Renton; however, the tightline sections of pipe for
Outfall 1 and Outfall 2 lie within King County's jurisdiction. Outfall 3 appears to be
entirely within Renton, but a survey will need to be conducted to confirm this. City
Surface Water Utility staff conducted an inspection of the outfalls on February 15, 2012,
to assess their condition. All three outfalls had completely failed which has �esulted in
significant undercutting of the steep ravine and sedimentation of Maplewood Creek and
the Maplewood Sediment pond. The existing condition of the three outfalls is described
as follows:
Outfall 1
Outfall 1 is located at the southwest corner of the Heather powns Division No. 2 (Photos
1-1, 1-2, 1-3, and 1-4). The outfall's conveyance pipe begins as buried 12" diameter
corrugated aluminum pipe in SE 4th PI. The pipe continues south for 130' in a 10' storm
sewer easement delineated on the plat before transitioning to an at grade 18" diameter
aluminum tightline pipe system anchored down a steep forested ravine. The storm
sewer easement lies between two homes (Parcel No. 3211100690 and Parcel No.
3211100700). Most of the tightline system is located in an unplatted tract of the
Maplewood Heights subdivision. Approximately 50' from the top of the slope, the pipe
transitions to an 18" diameter CPE pipe for 70' and then to a buried 24" diameter CMP
under what looks like an unpaved access road. At the downstream side of the access
road, the 18" pipe protrudes out of the road embankment where the slope below the
access road has failed, exposing a 15' deep gulley. Further downstream, in what was
the outfall, broken sections of pipe lay at the bottom of the gulley covered in
May 22,201Z
vegetation. The gulley transitions to a small stream which is tributary to Maplewood
Creek approximately 600' downstream. The area encompassing the gulley appears to
be contained within private property(Parcel No. 1523059187). A title search was
completed for this parcel and the unplatted tract, and no drainage easement was listed
under the exceptions or special exceptions to title. Access to the buried section of pipe
at the top of the slope is difficult due to the planting of arbor vitae and construction of a
fence within the easement.
Outfall 2
Outfall 2's conveyance system originates as a buried 12" diameter concrete pipe in a
manhole at the intersection of SE 4th PI and Chelan Ave SE (Photos 2-1, 2-2, 2-3, and 2-
4). The pipe continues southeast within a 10' storm sewer easement delineated on the
plat. From the manhole, the pipe is buried for approximately 150' between 2 homes
(Parcel No. 3211100930 and Parce) No. 3211100940). At the top of the slope, the
buried pipe daylights into a concrete flume and then to an 18" diameter corrugated
aluminum tightline pipe that is secured with two concrete anchors. Just beyond the last
anchor and approximately 40' from the top of the slope, the pipe terminates and
discharges into 20' deep gulley that formed when the slope became unstable and failed.
What remains of the outfall are sections of mangled aluminum pipe at the bottom of
the gulley adjacent to exposed sandstone. Because of the proximity of the slope failure
to the homes at the top of the slope, there is a concern that continued erosion and
subsidence of the slope may place these properties at risk. Maplewood Creek is located
just downstream of the gulley. The tightline system and outfall are located within Tract
A of the Hideaway Homes Sites subdivision. A title search was completed for Tract A
and no drainage easement was listed under the exceptions or special exceptions to title.
Access to the buried section of pipe is difficult due to the placement of a fence and
shrubs in the easement. The location of a carport may also make it difficult to access
the pipe.
May 22,2012
Outfall 3
Outfall 3's conveyance system begins in a manhole at the intersection of SE 2"d PI and
Chelan Ave SE (Photos 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4). The 18" diameter CMP lies within a 20'
utility easement on Parcel No. 3211101039 and delineated on the plat. The pipe is
buried for approximately 140' before day lighting midway down the ravine. Once above
ground,the pipe continues down the slope for approximately 15' and then terminates
above a 10' depression where the slope has eroded causing the pipe to separate from
the outfall. The top half of the pipe is missing. At the bottom of the ravine, a roughly
20' section of what remains of the outfall pipe lies in the Maplewood Creek channel. A
considerable amount of sediment has been deposited in the stream channel. The
tightline system and outfall are located within Parcel No. 1523059007. As with the
other outfalls, access to the buried section of pipe at the top of the slope may be
problematic due to the proximity of a fence and vegetation within the easement area.
Since the outfalls and associated conveyance systems for Outfalls 1 and 2 are located
within the jurisdictions of the City of Renton and King County, it is in both our interest to
work together to develop a solution to prevent further erosion of the ravine to minimize
impacts to water quality, property, and public safety.
At your earliest convenience, please contact me at 425-430-7248 or
rstraka@rentonwa.�ov to set up a meeting to discuss the best approach to addressing
the condition of these outfalls.
Sincerely,
Ron Straka, PE
Surface Water Utility Supervisor
cc: Lys Hornsby, P.E.,Utility Systems Division Director
Allen Quynn, P.E.,Surface Water Utility Engineer
Outfall 1 Photos
�y - � : �._ . 1 f . '!'
.� ` � i.. � �' �� ��"' �,� - a `{�� s
'�i �y.
�� '� h ?AC a✓i� , s
/ F t��.l' ��'a, . 'r �� ' .�� � � ¢; �
� , � �`.: �z' ���'' '
�. . r. � s � �
� r ,, >=�.• yy � � �t
' ' �+ `~�"l_�t ; `3�sy ^I:^it�. � k�? ���� � �� "
�� '3"° . tia 1�� r�+#�"'�j'�`y���� ��.
� .x r�.� � � ,
. '✓j=�� ��` �'-'�� Y Y�
�+'�� "`L� ' ��ZY�I Rd�#i. �,,; ��{1[� � '�;T�`l ��_ � ���� -.�.,¢�a. .
.,
��.�Eq�P... I f r j Jv� F' � -�,�. , � �a -. � r
-'�- �`r�-'�`.� �a . � � �,.k ��.� -.�z+-� ., 'y'.
I�.�s t . �;',#�4a, r�/1 �.
`�"��t � , - _ r = �.,�
,�. ,.
�
,
_,� � �
; ;
;
�'�;.''�*� s-c!�, t' '*�..� � :. , �,'�'''19��'�►'.�
' '�,� �, � 'w �.»�� �����. ,-�
:. , ;�
F.� t Cf r� ' .
� � � ,.L •t �� j-•„ `
:� S '� S..yfi� ' �,� � ���� •4 ���I~ �� �
r „�
x�� t � ,"I,�YY �
� ; .- . . - 'af��a-*}'- , � 7i
:-` ` :�1s�� �> `� a'�'' �'' �,'= .•. „�
��.s 1� r.' � t,
i y F .�' „�` " � , ��. .� �R'}I �� � _:
: .
.
w ` �
'. - ... pt `!� p - i s.� . �` � g.
� ,� '�" ��Y`�"�� '-ry . '��� ��� "ty`. '�s��.� �¢�7�1/'�`�-r,�,'��. P� �
. . . .. .,._, . ., . _ .... ,.`'i� ._ . . c._ . ,�.JI�_ . .. ..t'.y. \�-a
Photo 1-1-18" aluminum pipe anchored on slope Photo 1-2—18" CMP protruding over 15'gulley
�ir _." / _•'� c ��- �r��y�� +� c �., t � �� ..s fi� _
RT ' +�f _ � �� �� .4,�.�j' � �t>�'�� .s ���'�+` �4��_i�'_ �''.
. . , a .� x}�; ""?'' ,
'- � E�� ; "� � /J."%Y�- '' .2�E � � �'�}'3 L'..�-./� r�1a� - �
.�. . . � y Y `
�. , � .
- � � � . ' ��
�..� � ; ...�`,�� ���:1 �r�-� _��s-'.,,�{�. r � »'�"�- � � ,�, �`
1 �-� . r �. r'' �,� : , ..0��- - y -� �: r. 7 s� '�
ti .*e -•• • r,���m, �s .
# ,f'�' �v # 1 � s_� '`
s, w i^ +tc.'`� �')�fr � rf '`-, � r � r � ,�+.i�
��li. rt-R�• .����' .'�7't £-4 = �� �t :�t�.�c.: . t*z t.., w'",' ��
����` �' �a�• i�- _y,�� w .. ��_ �F` ��.-a#�I' ��' � �,�'t`� ,� �� x�`�� ��'.�•y..
. Q,�, 8y���� ,�f E'+`.�-�i f•,; �� .r� .�.i'ltf«��i ::��'(�� /}�..� - _ �yY�� `s �t a
� � .,� I
I �..r •� ,���� . � �t!i� &����3 �'�'d�� 3 �?�. . `s - '" � K s+.:� .� 4-�s.��.-+r"_
�Y ..; a�' '� i' � f . Y�Lh�s 4 �'�..� / , i!s� .r '1� �'
�'�. �+'.'� � '. . ���., `i rC�"`�.'� '�� �` ' - �,�i w ''�Q'
f. . .{ �T � �se- ��- .y _4 .r� �� �` _
�� �"� �'n, '' +�� ,,,,,iSn�,.-.� {� jty�` �.��
, r
'�"�'^ r' � �������� f� �K''c :�t - �i,������� '�� :_`` j',�� cs..
� - �.� �vr'"�:.'1
�: ' . F t� � �.� �a . R f ir- �i .+�,. .I �. t� ��� ;���' � � ���.
� �.it'� ^�<�� 4R�'�t`/s` �.=-'+►�- �,,�_`�5�,.�y S.T. �ly @$' �. .j•�` � ,.�' ii�
�..�� .. . Y�' },.� 'y� t�,.�°�` i.�'y��.?'�_ �a� . l��� � ._ � 4�.#-e��:� ����„�,_r�.
f" tt'` '-i�,g� 'a�ll�3'� ,'M`3�'�* . e. ,� ._ f . . ,.:� .j�. �.
R���. g../'. _`` } ^��'�C.r ��� '' �}'✓` a 1`� '�rt . :�,�� '�/•�I¢��r �.��RI.� �
'�'� ' Ti"� � M :4 � '�!� �'�r. ,y,f y} � � �.
��:t�. ` ��-'['Y-' "7�` ��'.� 1� t�•4 �~�� ��� r F I .��.�� �'a , ,- ✓�y� K.t
'�f _ ' � .r'... �' .c* ��`��`��,#'.." _ �"�,�e.•'���t '1��`�� -� '� +'° �
,- � i,l��. �'—'}��y^-', � =' "�` w
� � .�
�r �� � a�1 � ...♦��c���t}� I �1�,r�_',�'�s �F��T(/�s.a`ar. 1'. � (��r y.�a`,�'�j�/y���
�. __t��lilrll�'� K; .2i!^ r\3� I . .. ^��, �fIA. �`a.T�. 1: ` 7.. .,��K�•1__. �9�#^� _
�� Photo 1-4—Se arated section of 18"CMP at bottom of
— I d on slo e P
Photo 1-3 18 CPE anchore p
gulley
Outfall 2 Photos
,' ,� ,� �, � �' �� r;���' �� ���`��
; � � K .�.� �.��• .-� ��i�
, t��u.-'�+<�' .c,."�a�''.
� �
,� � �, M� n� T j .4
- , ,,, ,
�
H ;���'��'�����- 'p.
: - .. . � . �.-, .y�� :ff'.
;'
u
. V . / .� � y �, =^,� ���v ��f� _�-
�� r �� � �� - _�_ .. � �. �h� � -x t-� ".;+�F� J��" �� �
x a ��, ... , T a4y�; . . E wd�`—�`4' �`�_
,� '
'� s^� '� e t. I `„�`� i't�„� >f�� �r�'� s'
ts ��• '' g�� `� y-- �`"` � .-��'Z ,. lr�-.
Wt'�' r .ae.a ��y .'�i� � � s N'E
yyy � � t � ��4�..�i����CAC^*. . . • .,�$b� `��.�9,�r' +.y�i�i'.i.�. 4`,a.;��� '
� � �' j j'fi� b`. _ �/1� .� _'. �]ft" � � -' ���.
^ '
..;� ��P'f- �_` ..:- .^ ; _ r .}sjg �y~ �� �''� A ti
. p, 'xe N � }. � _. _ .
�.� t� ,'�" C f-. _ _ F , r-,�-� - ��s` � Q ..
f
� �'� .s'i� t� .a `��y I'� f - � _ � i� � � 1� ` �I J4_�.r
�) �� °..� p,-: q L�f.?'q 4 f�j, . \ . . „4 = � '�a"� f� :� ,` µ,
J��t - � ' ,� .«. � '
"S' ':� �',` 5�+. y��i_
S. �5.-``*7� �� '
:�ry� � ���'r -Y �,� , �t� :�i
� . 'y+.. �' ��: ..� �..�,'� . t 'i
�.1 f �1 r ��'S�� ' � �
•�� r.afi'.-�"
� ...i. ' �/k. � . ... 3� 1�'� � +i��--a
Photo 2-1—Buried pipe section in 10'easement Photo 2-2—18" aluminum pipe anchored to slope
d ,
- J � '`�; �; '➢J�= a �' t S+`f ,£ ,r.y��3,:_ - �
� � ��
. '� ,` � _ , i
4 . 4". . . �..
ra'�'r,e�'� �! _ -� . c ` - 1
� �� � ��
+�'•r.� v-� s+ y � gIr.
� '..r t �-� `f.'.� �'� I' �^"�{�r ' � .. .. ; ;rr �f f�.
�� --.i� �� . v.g; . ' , t • ,
. "���, ��-� - � . -":�f ' ..` j � �' - ���tri'!��
�, ���r.s t t�--���� � � �, �v� :,..+.. . f ��__
�A�� �t� , f-.. � ��� 'C� � �� �`� �.� �`if � � �'�,' ����
.r��.r �
.�#'�a "`�-� 1_� ,�� s�'�.t - � _. �' � �r�a .� �. `�i''... � .n'fi .�, �..�,. 'c.:,1�'�,�_' . .t
�:' j'� �' �:�_'� t'�. „�a �3+Ac',� ��'�� _.
� �:4 � rY��
41 �..'. � ,;`: " �' r,�, �-?� '� b- ' ;��?�.►. .o�• _:� �
�' � ,.:. ' -1 e` ;j, �` .I ..- - , �'i�- ,t�
;, �.. _
- � # ` . . � � �i�
.:
' � K �: r�:'� - �� s�"s�M- '����� a �,, _ i r ,J+r. -- � �-.�"-�.
c. .� '- .� � �
� '' ,_ _
.r � . _. � -'L,��f e:'. W � -f-' ': ' ' �.� - �• ' .�.1�•'j4.�a.5". - � r..
. _ s�:,,r1 ' �<� :v..- :ir,+•�{. �� ��ir'r��=, '
� .f:>' :'<f��.+��ij A�. �,� I I�� Y'Si��=' ��� ` �. ._" _�1,'.���zi f�� .asr
f" �� '. I ,r _Ta1 6pY .
� � .._,��.'�,.I -�� �-:1, 192�."'.�� i .�x 1 _..y �y�-�' .:i"' '�'i x'' _�1 =r �� ,_�
� `A ♦ { .. i� r6�S�` :a •k' ..; �� ,�' 1� "'� "t' ��`�)_ �� `� +!
. ��_ ,��iOG•����r . .� '�� � �tvl�..a� �a . � '*. �y"'y���y(�� �_ �'�-`f �.. t- �-�
.r'f..fiJ..� _...,.� _ ..dE�i: � F��I�'.i. '�,�� .�l#`1Ra�3i� '.lP YB�i^�_ v
� Photo 2-3—18" aluminum outfall debris at bottom of Photo 2-4—Inside gulley looking downstream towards
gulley Maplewood Creek
Outfall 3 Photos
r. ,.�f��� r�, 1 ; �e ik
.� ���_�
�I a ` :I 14 � � `
^.� �{��s:#+ ,� , �� ''�� '�, .� _� n� � � . .
3 t^ ��`.�,� `Y�4 . �' '�t:w
L a � ..},��y i`M� .:h 'dl-+�:=` t�� �� je t
t - ��. � ��. � _�£. .
•.t � 4.e�-'i +s, r�`'�•p'�.�. :Yc�i.� £ ]f'-:.. {� ' M1
� ...m ---_ L sysK'a•�: y. � .. �-.Y'A' . .ia..
,�.F- ,�-a"t ;f ? ,i, � ,`k�` ?
. , - ��. __ .� r � �`a� �, . � . �
..� �" - � . �..- � <— a�;� ,ati r c
a
� T�� I �'�'. � '�� �*�`4� i��ax io ,j* 1 � ��`�
. _" . :� '.,a . ��,sn � ����i3��� �,��` \���� �y`�r�{'s��� ���.' -
; �y � � .a� �.4�v�� ���a 'r �*Y�)�`w,t� .x � 'd`
� -�� f. ., , �,r _. _. . �� /���'�: � 'i�s�"�'� �`3g�j�,�`sr w�-:a � .
- " s �,_ . . _ -- ���, 1• �". +r ���*' �ciry'����t S�n'}�,.�� � _; .x�
g� ._ N
` . .. ^ y �_:'K � � �. r i �a �,.,
. �� �
� �
..,c,� : �� �� .�r +��'� i�•t���a•��y 0���,y,
ti
_ ++f _. -. ' P I [�u L...:�" �� ��ie��tr;sy ��t
` �" �2 � .:��:i11
e +yr�l
_ ;:'`�e• �a� �
z`��,�` C2 1F &�i2 F �--- ,� ' ��,,�.`:��. .�'_•� ` L:
�' " "" ,; ��,�y 'r�,y,I�r�,� ,«...... � "�'_�a '
Photo 3-1—Manhole and Buried pipe section in 20' Photo 3-2—18 CMP suspended over 10' depression.
easement at Chelan Ave SE and SE 2"d St. Note that top half of pipe is missing
,g _ , ,.• ,,.> ..-,����t���
, ='i"��fp�''� ; � Y. :: '
.. � `':�"' �s i p .A h � ;� c� y
�,,,? t f.. .� "� �:�1 .t.� `�` ;�°
�� � � ` i ��{.+,�_•y�y'�'!��i. � '
���i� ��� i , �•' ���� a . .�.1�"f���, e;
�" ' :s �r �3i; /��. . a,.�i. d�. � _�:. �: A.?I���,fi.". _ ��'� '�s*�'"�'�!.�i,�jl
���''����t`� �� a�'"t �.' :���`"r-w�l9'/i.���+ ,,,� i 3:�.� ��:. �':.i � .. �� " � r� ,
��- ...� �,,� , '� ..+'� ��, e--e �__P_;$�-•y� ` .. ,� �+.�`.�.s ._�3
� l ^ ,
.
� � '_ � �� �,. � flS� '.. *ff - �s �w\ ..m . ' � �- ,.•r
_�v���, •* _ . _ � � � -
� �� " � g��Ah��� �'�s , ty._. �_..�^�i��
t�
,4 .-� G � j�w.� . ' ��� -i`av. x�;r
... r�Y�-� ^� `.� ,�.��.4,.��' �.:' 4�,,��3-�`. -�i. $'��.., � ��'° •• /���i�+, - �
' �" -,t. ��. � ,.3► y�'d": i. C- ..J�
' .. -t . -s`.��� ~;.+P"c..��A,��.�. --�z. '��f• .� , 4 _7'r '� ',c. �. e'1�' -Ft
4 � r� :� .r� � � ��r s ° a � ?� `
� �-'' .''+. �. .�� _,, ���.�w, .r- � ,d"'" �, ,;�• ''��,��` , �-a ' k `.
n� � .:4 . y, �i.�r-�. i � �'�'e .. �I
.
s
,.
�,_
� . � " .s
�-
�' Y . � ^� l..i. ' � >._ � 'y- .`�t�t+�+' .
-si,:4 . - . -S<c. -._� 7 q � :;Y�l�� - ��\t��`�t - .
y
>
� r - � ��'' ` --�—. � '
. : _ .
1��; �-.. `+`,� {�:: �'� '� .�� .r?: : ',, r $.� ;'�� a�y���� `.}� „:�; � .. .
i� �+��,�"`: .�, :��4��,�� �y_�} � 4. ,4..,s�t 7 � -�4j"��� ;�FP�'� �
+.,i �� �,�4,r^� L^� . ;� . '�+�' tr° �'� — t e�r �`/1��.%
�f'�1'+� �r 5 ..d.; `t�p : � �� � '�� �� '�Y �_. � �Y f/1f�
�' .a ��g ,�-'"` '�'- � .. _.. �'��P�. _ y:..'1����:� ,� . W'p� 1
� L� a,a"`Y, }y ..� ,.I� � � . `� L rf „: �
� 'r � •,.rK # � ���M , �' � ���
.�-t� `'�' �•. �f.^�������: �a i �'�" ..�.
�7i�.�.J. �• _ ._ �_.. . , '`�'e? F . .� � .. �Q�t :iC,�"a .. � . .._ . �� +f .�-.�
Photo 3-3—18" CMP outfall debris in Maplewood Creek Photo 3-4—18" CMP outfall with top half of pipe missing
channel
� FILE�'O. 2O�4��647 I
� King County
NAME
Department ofNatural tn I
Resources ADDRESS 14017 SE 139 St
Water and Land Resource Division PHONE 425-226-0690 TB PAGE 656H3
� KROLL PAGE 810E DATE
DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT �,�INT.D[VISION 4 �vrri�,s CTM
FIELD INVESTIGATION
Met Russell Berg at his home on 8/20/14. He and his wife have lived there for 38 years. Their property is 4.93 acres. The house sits on the northem portan
with the rest of the land dropping over 100'into a steep wooded ravine with a seasonal stream that flows from east to west.He explained his land is n
unincorporated King County(KC),but he is now surrounded by the City of Renton which has allowed many homes to be built including 46 new houses directly
noRh of him. Mr Berg called for several reasons. 1) Many of the trees growing in the ravine are falNng. They have the potential to fall on his house and/or
neighbors adjacent to the ravine. Mr Berg would like to have some of the"dange�'trees cut down. It is doubtful permits would be granted,but I told Mr Berg I
would provide him with the agency he should contact. 2) No fish have ever been seen in the stream,yet the City of Renton now says it is a fish bearing
steam. It is my understanding WA State Fish and Game DepaRment is the agency ihat identfies and tracks this information. I will try to find out how they
identify the stream. 3)There is a 4-5'diameter pipe he said the county put in that discharges large amounts of water into the ravine causing bank erosion He
pointed out the pipe is located directiy east of his property(at about 13839 144"'Ave SE). Researching plat maps of the area and KC Roads mapping,I was
unable to find any records of such a pipe.4)Since cameras were installed at a nearby elementary school cars bypass the area using SE2nd PI instead. With
the addition of the new homes no traffic control is planned at the intersedion of 139'"Ave SE and SE 2nd PI which they fear wi1 cause accidents due to a knoll
just to the east of 139�'Ave SE causing little or no site distance at the intersection. The intersedion is at the border of Renton and unincorporated KC. When
asked if he had brought that to Renton's attentan when ihey were evaluating the new housing project he said he had,but they did not require the developer to
install any improvements. SE 2nd PI was temporarily dosed due to the new construction on the day of my visit. 9/9/14 follow-up. Provided Mr Berg with phone
numbers of the other agencies he should contact and told him we did locate a plan sheet that indicated a 42'pipe that outfals on the other side of the stream
and that we would request KC Roads armor the outfall area,but if they could not we would try to elevate the issue to an Engineering Review for possibly an
NDAP project. 9/10/14 Russell Berc,7 emailed four photos of the pipe and downed trees in Maplewood Creek.
•��������6»�����
�,�,� i ��`�+�.�.� �.. �
?' �:�— �� : , :
���!� � —, ,� , ., � N
, t`�_�J{.�I,l.'��� ����� ' . F �' �
���� •('�?1 � �
�13 s�����: � � ��, � .:� .� NTS
�'� � '� I ��4.... #. � "�
�� �-'..'13y7�� ��+�.,,� -+r
'a► i 391� ,`;' `,,�,
� i � ��� -
'�:
;�� �'tGR 73I�`l�! � �.
-- �'`�'fi i:i7U6) �+�
.,I� � �� "''`Tg'�� t 312 5�U' � _'�
,, � `�:', -, �� -
' �3'�v��J �+''J3J1 U �'± "����
� 1�h�r".' �`` ► - J
I M�1i��'� ����r 1� _ a �. -�
�i,' � � ,
II������� � _jr,.; r +"�``•,;
� �_7 i� 'r,.s ' _ �
�,�>� ��� �
�. - .�
��i'�L;�f � �;�,�` e I' �,�r. ..�. T � �
} i!,l. � � � �
� ,�
� �� � . �¢�'' � �� q 7�1U3J r
-
{� ''�±$i17 !�i��tiJc� �. r'• . - � �;
I _ i �.. � u� .. -•�� ���
1!1 �� ��s.�3 ri� -��� ' 3 �i
I ���'i tr� � r ���
��� ��,'''i38l9 i �1:39L�E� '"���' � � .,f,.,.
� �r �� �� r.�,-z . —
, � �
� 1�0��4 ���'-}:1����� �i� �
�� �+ i V � � �.�e' 7 ;�..:, f 'M-��
� - �� �1�� �.. :y- _ ��, �' s -:>.�
� ''�-,�..�,�u�_��i - - i- �"���
4�'`�yC�1�1 jy��'_�_-_�..� �.•-'� ,� ' !$ - - � '�•. T�.;,.iy
'�•+�ti--.t� _r/r ...�y � � -�� . - �-a ��+:
'.. � �` ��� .������ '.� �� �" ���Y
_y�_ . - .. � �ll��_!� 1_ ., .r �� ������
��-' � .Y,+�'!
. f' � ���A� � /! . �_-` I � � ���'�t��
�i�.`':�. �_.=-`-`'==:.� �' �. —;���.y �>
�' :�- ��~. .•+ �,���r �
��I��;i ;h
•"'� _' �}�' .12''" �, � j�
:}. __ _--�__•� -�, �
�L/ ,.' J�_' �����► `ir�jE' ,� •
. �,
y_ � '� �
�=-_.�-.'..�i--"''r��1�1lI��7�1.[1 I 1)1�'.'t� I i: '�
� �
r�
Preliminary Technical I�nformation Report
Plat of Copperwood
Sectton 3.0 Off—Site Analysis TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION Paragraph 3.1 Cornreyance System Nuisance
Problems(Type i)and paragraph 3.2 Se�ere Erosion Problems(Type 2)
Nearly all of Maplewvod Creek Tributary 03U3 downstream of the proposed Coppervvood Development .
is within King County as has been this development site until quite recently.Complaints about
conveyance nuisance problems and existing severe Erosion problems a�e�tikely recorded with King
County and not with the C"tty of Renton.To only review C'ity of Renton reports of downstream erosion
problems for Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 does nat identify the longstanding probiems known to
King County.King County records of erosion probtems of Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 should be �
reviewed and acknawiedged in this report.
Attached to this email is a series of pictures I took during thjs past week of some of the erosion damage
that has recently occurred on the portion of Maplewood Creek Tributary 0303 that passes through my
property. My property begins just downstream of the nearly ninety degree turn that Maplewood Creek
makes from a generally north-south direction as it paues through the Copperwood Plat to a westerly
direction a short distance south of the Plat as shown on the maps included in the subjett report.Along
this nearty six hundred feet of Mapiewood Creek st�eambed that 1 own there have recently been a
number of large evergreen trees topple over due to washing out the soil unde�these trees along the
creek bed.One large cedar Vee recentty fell in a southeriy direction from the north edge of the creek
into the back yard of the house at the top of the ravine miuing the roof only by a few feet.The large
root ball of this tree �emains in the stream bed partiaily blodcing the stream flow. i believe this report
should be revised to acknowledge there are serious erosion problems currently existing below the
proposed development 3ite.
Thank you fo�your consideration of this issue. �
Russell Berg
14017 SE 139T"St.
Renton WA.98059 .
• � r��c��v��
EXHIBIT 11•1 . SEP 0 2 2014
c:��v o� P�r�TON
n'_L.NN1iJG Oit�l$ION