HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 10/17/2011AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
October 17, 2011
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATION
a. National Business Women's Week® ‐ October 17 to 21, 2011
4.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Police Department ‐ Employee Distinguished Service Recognition
5.PUBLIC HEARING
a. Fairlane Woods Annexation ‐ 60% Petition to Annex for approximately 37.4 acres located in the
vicinity of 129th Pl. SE and SE 159th St.
6.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
7.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in
the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST
NAME.
NOTICE to all participants: pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17.130, campaigning for any ballot
measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including
the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED.
8.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/10/2011. Council concur.
b. City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011 through 9/30/2011 and
expiration report for agreements expiring 10/1/2011 to 3/31/2012. Information.
c. Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends approval of an interlocal
agreement with King County to allow Renton to participate in the County Cities Climate
Collaboration, with an annual fee of $2,500. Council concur. (See 9.a. for resolution.)
d. Community Services Department recommends setting a public hearing on 11/7/2011 to
consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Plan. Council concur; set
public hearing on 11/7/2011.
e. Finance and Information Technology Department recommends setting a public hearing on
11/7/2011 to consider the proposed 2012 Property Tax Levy and proposed 2012 Mid‐biennium
Budget Adjustment. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearing on 11/7/2011.
Page 1 of 395
9.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Cedar River Park Parking Lot Lighting Contract with Transportation
Systems, Inc.
b. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Lease Amendment with Renton Gateway Center
10.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
a. Climate collaboration interlocal agreement with King County (See 8.c.)
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)
b. Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading 10/10/2011)
11.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.)
12.AUDIENCE COMMENT
13.ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
7TH FLOOR CONFERENCING CENTER
October 17, 2011
Monday, 6 p.m.
Committee to End Homelessness 10‐Year Mid‐Plan Review
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 2 of 395
3
a
.
‐
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
W
o
m
e
n
'
s
W
e
e
k
®
‐
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
1
7
t
o
2
1
,
2
0
1
1
P
a
g
e
3
o
f
3
9
5
5a. ‐ Fairlane Woods Annexation ‐ 60% Petition to Annex for
approximately 37.4 acres located in the vicinity of 129th Pl. SE and SE Page 4 of 395
5a. ‐ Fairlane Woods Annexation ‐ 60% Petition to Annex for
approximately 37.4 acres located in the vicinity of 129th Pl. SE and SE Page 5 of 395
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Contract Lists:
3rd Quarter 2011
Six-month Exp. Report
Meeting:
Regular Council - 17 Oct 2011
Exhibits:
List of agreements signed from July 1, 2011
through September 30, 2011;
List of agreements expiring between October 1,
2011 and March 31, 2012
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
Recommended Action:
None; Information only
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Fully executed in 3rd quarter 2011 were 43 contracts, 20 addendums, and 4 change orders affecting 70
agreements.
The six-month expiration report shows 121 agreements expiring between July 1, 2011 and December 31,
2011.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
None; Information only
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 6 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 7 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 8 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 9 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 10 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 11 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 12 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 13 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 14 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 15 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 16 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 17 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 18 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 19 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 20 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 21 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 22 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 23 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 24 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 25 of 395
8b. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 7/1/2011
through 9/30/2011 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 26 of 395
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Interlocal Agreement to participate in "Cities
Climate Collaboration" with County and County
Cities
Meeting:
Regular Council - 17 Oct 2011
Exhibits:
King County Cities Climate Collaboration
Background
Interlocal Agreement
Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Kris Sorensen x6593
Recommended Action:
Council concur.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 2,500.00 Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ 2,500.00 Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The King County Cities Climate Collaboration is a new partnership between cities in the county and the
county to increase the effectiveness of local sustainability and climate change solutions by working
together. To date, the cities of Snoqualmie, Redmond, Shoreline, Issaquah, Tukwila, Mercer Island,
Kirkland, and Seattle, along with King County, have committed to participate in the Collaboration. Mayor
Law has verbally supported Renton's participation. The annual membership fee is based on population
tiers with Renton's fee at $2,500 and will be funded through the department's existing budget
allocation. City Council approval of the interlocal agreement is needed for the City to participate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the interlocal agreement to allow City of Renton to participate in the County Cities Climate
Collaboration.
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 27 of 395
Whereas, we, King County and the undersigned cities of King County, wish to work together
to directly respond to climate change and reduce global and local sources of climate
pollution;
Whereas, we believe that by working together we can increase our efficiency and
effectiveness in making progress towards this goal;
Whereas, we are interested in achieving this goal in a way that builds a cleaner, stronger and
more resilient regional economy;
Whereas, we are interested in focusing on local solutions to leverage and partner with
related collaborative efforts;
Whereas, partnering on sustainable solutions will advance progress towards Cities’
environmental, climate change, and energy goals such as those adopted by the nearly half of
King County Cities that have signed on to the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection
Agreement;
Now, therefore, we agree to participate in this effort and collaborate regionally with our
County and City partners to develop and coordinate the following:
• Outreach: Develop, refine, and utilize messaging and tools for climate change
outreach to engage decision makers, other cities, and the general public.
• Coordination: Collaborate on adopting consistent standards, benchmarks, strategies,
and overall goals related to responding to climate change.
• Solutions: Share local success stories, challenges, data and products that support and
enhance climate mitigation efforts by all partners.
• Funding and resources: Collaborate to secure grant funding and other shared
resource opportunities to support climate related projects and programs.
My city will participate and contribute to the King County-Cities Climate Collaboration by
dedicating staff and a financial contribution, based on my city’s population, per Exhibit A.
Designated Signatory: .
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 28 of 395
2
Pledge and Collaboration Objectives
The Pledge is a partnership between the Cities of King County and King County itself to
increase the effectiveness of local sustainability and climate change solutions by working
together. The Collaboration aims to:
o Develop regional emissions targets and track progress towards these goals
o Share local success stories and challenges
o Pursue and share grants, resources and group funding sources
o Provide coordinated outreach and messaging on climate change solutions
o Raise the profile of climate efforts of King County Cities and the County itself
o Coordinate City and County sustainability efforts through workshops,
presentations and other efforts
What is the plan?
To achieve these objectives, the King County-Cities Climate Collaboration started hosting bi-
monthly Sustainable Cities Roundtables on climate solutions in January 2011. In addition,
During the summer of 2011, cities will be encouraged to commit to the King County-Cities
Climate Collaboration Pledge and participate in the Sustainable Cities Roundtables1.
As the collaboration develops, participating city staff will develop resources to support
local efforts, such as:
o Creating a directory of local climate solutions resources including a technical
expert resource directory
o Developing a list of consultants with local experience and expertise
o Documenting and sharing best practices and lessons learned from local projects
and programs
When City pledges provide sufficient funding, additional staffing will be hired to
implement joint projects in the pledge focus areas and pursue additional resources to
support city sustainability efforts.
Members will have the opportunity to participate in Sustainable Cities Roundtable series
and workshops that help to advance local and regional climate solutions.
Who is participating?
Multiple entities have participated in developing this initiative, including King County, ICLEI-
Local Governments for Sustainability, and the cities of Bellevue, Black Diamond, Kirkland,
Mercer Island, Redmond, Renton, Seattle, Shoreline, Snoqualmie and Tukwila.
All King County Cities are encouraged to participate
Cities will begin signing the pledge at the June 9th Sustainable Cities Roundtable
1 2010 Sustainable Cities Roundtable details: http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/greenbuilding/roundtable.asp
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 29 of 395
3
How is this Different from Existing Efforts?
The King County-Cities Climate Collaboration is the only collaborative climate effort focused
solely on local King County-based efforts. Existing networks, such as ICLEI and the Mayor’s
Climate Protection Initiative, provide resources, camaraderie and political legitimacy, but
their scope is on a much larger scale. The Collaboration is focused on the needs of local King
County governments.
Collaboration can be an effective motivator for change: it can increase commitment;
catalyze action; promote mutual learning through social networks; and strengthen local
governments’ ability to attract sustainable development investments from both the private
sector and grantor agencies. Within the Collaboration, King County municipalities can work
together on tangible projects and programs, standardize goals and measures for assessing
progress, and share best practices and lessons learned. Collaboration through this effort is
also a great way to achieve results with limited resources.
Why Work with King County?
Early on, Collaboration cities asked King County if it could be a vehicle for helping organize
Collaboration activities, provide fiscal management and participate in this local focus on
climate solutions. King County has a history of striving to assist its cities and towns with a
broad range of sustainability and environmental efforts. Collaborating with King County
government provides additional resources and political legitimacy that can help move the
effort forward.
Why is this Important?
To address climate change, action needs to be taken at all levels of government. Climate
policy, projects and programs can be fragmented and inconsistent, and many of the tools
needed to develop cohesive responses are lacking. Localities must overcome financial,
technical, informational, capacity-related and institutional obstacles. Currently, local climate
change action has achieved more success than national efforts, but there is a great need to
further address sources of climate pollution. For significant emission reductions to occur,
city and county governments need to work together.
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 30 of 395
4
What will this Pledge funding do?
In support of this effort, King County has already pledged funding to expand the Sustainable
Cities Roundtable to a monthly event, with every-other month focused on local and regional
climate issues and initiatives. These roundtables are opportunities for sharing best practices,
discussion, hearing from experts, workshops and brainstorming on specific projects.
When pledged city funding levels are sufficient, the Collaboration will hire full/partial staff
support for Pledge priorities. For the first year the goal is to hire a King County Community
Energy Action Corps2 Member, budgeted at $17,000 full time or $9,000 part-time. In future
years, the Collaboration may also host an annual symposium, or annual symposium session
track addressing local climate solutions.
Cities that sign the pledge will also sign a Technical Service Agreement that includes a
detailed Scope of Work for this effort. The Collaboration’s Scope of Work will be voted on
annually by participating Cities and King County and requires a majority vote by three
quarters of participants. Contact either of the below representatives for more details.
Show me the Money (Funding the Pledge)
It’s a familiar story: the “green” program sounds nice but how will we pay for it? The King
County-Cities Climate Collaboration Pledge includes annual fiscal commitments of its
signatories, sometimes helping fund staff support that we perhaps can’t afford in our own
cities. While the pledge amount is relatively small, what if you already feel like you are
scraping the bottom of the barrel for funds?
A recent ICLEI Fact Sheet3 on sustainability program funding sources provides some ideas:
o Consider the General Fund. As this work assists the efforts of multiple departments,
the Collaboration could be considered a general City benefit.
o Leftover federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) or other
stimulus-related funding. If grant expenditures weren’t as high as predicted, they
could be directed towards membership.
o Utilities budgets may sometimes provide membership funding. Greenhouse gases
come from multiple sources such as landfills, streets and sewers. These departments
may be good matches because of the strong nexus between climate pollution
creation and mitigation.
2 The Community Energy Action Corps is an AmeriCorps National and Community Service Volunteer program that allows members to work
for local governments on Environmental Stewardship projects. This program requires a cost match from participants to fund the positions.
3 For the full factsheet, see www.icleiusa.org/library/documents/ICLEI_Sustainability_Funding_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 31 of 395
5
o For future years consider incorporating membership costs in solid waste or
other utility fees.
o Some Cities institute cost-saving programs through energy efficiency retrofits and
operational changes. If your city has or is considering such a program, consider
dedicating your savings towards a membership aimed at capitalizing on similar
programs.
o Environmental Education and Outreach budgets of various departments may also be
a natural fit for budgeting the Climate Collaboration.
Pledge Funding: Population Tiers
The Pledge tiers for Collaboration members are based on signatory cities’ population sizes.
The original tiers were derived by a sample budget to operate the Collaboration including
staff needs, events funding, and expanding the Sustainable Cities Roundtable. Three
variations of Pledge Tier levels were developed to meet the projected budget. The variations
were evaluated by a steering committee based on their fairness to each city, what budgets
could realistically incorporate, and what would be sustainable for annual pledging over time.
The tiers selected actually were those least expensive for larger cities, and were agreed
upon by a wide range of city types, including rural cities, cities of different sizes and different
locations across King County.
For more information about this effort, contact:
Matt Kuharic, Senior Climate Change
Specialist
King County Dept of Natural Resources and
Parks Director's Office
(206) 296-8738 (office)
matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov
Web: http://www.kingcounty.gov/climate
Nicole Sanders, Associate Planner
City of Snoqualmie Planning Department
(425) 888-5337 x.1143
NSanders@ci.snoqualmie.wa.us
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 32 of 395
6
Exhibit A:
Financial Contribution Matrix
Note: Population data from the Puget Sound Regional Council’s download of 2010 census data
Population
Categories
Jurisdiction Population
Under
5,000
$500
Level 1
Skykomish 198
Beaux Arts Village 299
Hunts Point 394
Milton 831
Yarrow Point 1001
Carnation 1,786
Medina 2,969
Clyde Hill 2,984
Algona 3,014
Black Diamond 4,151
5,000 -
19,999 $700 Level 2
North Bend 5,731
Normandy Park 6,335
Pacific 6,514
Duvall 6,695
Newcastle 10,380
Enumclaw 10,669
Snoqualmie 10,670
Woodinville 10,938
Lake Forest Park 12,598
Bothell 17,090
Covington 17,575
Tukwila 19,107
Population
Categories
Jurisdiction Population
20-
39,999 $1,200 Level 3
Kenmore 20,460
Maple Valley 22,684
Mercer Island 22,699
SeaTac 26,909
Des Moines 29,673
Issaquah 30,434
Burien 33,313
40- 65,000 $2,000 Level 4
Sammamish 45,780
Kirkland 48,787
Shoreline 53,007
Redmond 54,144
Auburn 62,761
Over
65,000 $2,500 Level 5
Federal Way 89,306
Renton 90,927
Kent 92,411
Bellevue 122,363
Over
250,000 $5,000 Level 6
Seattle 608,660
King
County $10,000 Level 7
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 33 of 395
Page 1
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR CLIMATE COLLABORATION
This Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW among
participating Cities of King County, (hereinafter referred to as the "Cities"), municipal
corporations in the State of Washington, and King County, (hereinafter referred to as
the "County"), 201 S. Jackson, Suite 701, Seattle, WA 98104 (collectively, “the
Parties”).
Whereas, we, the Parties wish to work together to directly respond to climate change and
reduce global and local sources of climate pollution;
Whereas, the Parties believe that by working together we can increase our efficiency and
effectiveness in making progress towards this goal;
Whereas, the Parties are interested in achieving this goal in a way that builds a cleaner,
stronger and more resilient municipal and regional economies;
Whereas, the Parties are interested in focusing on local solutions to leverage and partner with
related collaborative efforts;
Whereas, partnering on sustainable solutions will advance progress towards Cities’
environmental, climate change, and energy goals such as those adopted by the nearly half of
the cities in King County that have signed the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows:
1.Purpose and Scope of this Agreement
1.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to outline responsibilities and tasks related to
the Parties that are voluntarily participating in the Climate Collaboration. The
Parties will develop and coordinate on the following efforts:
(a)Outreach: Develop, refine, and utilize messaging and tools for climate
change outreach to engage decision-makers, other cities, and the
general public.
(b)Coordination: Collaborate on adopting consistent standards,
benchmarks, strategies, and overall goals related to responding to
climate change.
(c)Solutions: Share information, data and products that support and
enhance climate mitigation efforts by all of the Parties.
(d)Funding and resources: Collaborate to secure grant funding and other
shared resource opportunities to support climate related projects and
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 34 of 395
Page 2
programs.
1.2 No Party to this agreement expressly or impliedly waives or forfeits any of its
rights, authority or autonomy.
1.3 All tools, outreach materials, data, collaborative efforts, and other resources
that are developed as part of this Agreement are optional for Cities and King
County to adopt or utilize.
2. Organization
2.1 Each Party shall appoint one designee and an alternate to serve as its
representative. Upon the effective execution of this Agreement and the
appointment of designees and alternate designees for each Party, designees
shall meet and choose, according to the voting provisions of this section,
representatives to serve as Chair and Vice Chair to oversee and direct the
activities associated with meetings including the development of the agendas,
running meetings and assuming the responsibility of advancing the Parties’
goals and interests related to this Agreement.
2.2. No action or binding decision will be taken without the presence of a quorum
of active designees or alternates. A quorum exists if a majority of the
designees present at the meeting. Each designee shall have an equal vote, with
a supermajority vote of 75% of all designees being required to approve the
final scope of the collaboration program or amend the scope. Any vote to
increase the amount of funding required by each Party, however, shall only be
binding on those who specifically agree to such increase.
2.3 Designees shall have the authority and mandate to administer the Tasks
outlined in Section 3.
2.4 Designees may approve a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to secure a vendors
or consultants needed to accomplish any Task, and shall interview one or more
applicants and make an appointment provided sufficient funds are available.
2.5 Designees shall meet and report on a quarterly basis to ensure that Tasks are
efficiently, effectively and responsibly delivered in the performance of this
Agreement, including the allocation of resources.
2.6 Designees shall develop an initial annual work plan and budget which the
Parties must finalize within one month of approval of the Agreement.
Subsequent annual work plans will be developed and approved on or before the
anniversary of the adoption of the first years’ work plan in conjunction with
budget planning for consideration and adoption by the Parties’ legislative
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 35 of 395
Page 3
bodies.
2.7 If direct payment in support of the annual work plan, such as for consultant
services or hiring staff, can be arranged by participating Cities, this is preferred.
If direct payment occurs, these funds will be accounted for towards that city’s
contribution. If this is not possible, funds collected from any source on behalf of
the Parties shall be maintained in a special fund by the County as ex officio
treasurer on behalf of the Collaboration. The County may, with the approval of
a majority of the Parties, also serve as the contractual agent for the Parties in
acquiring any service needed to complete Tasks of the Agreement.
3.Tasks
3. 1 Climate Collaboration Work Plan.
Finalize the Scope of Work for the Parties collaboration consistent with this
Agreement. This will take place after commencement per Section 5 of this
Agreement and is funding-dependent.
3.2 Fund the Climate Collaboration Work Plan (Budget $10,000).
Pay necessary expenses to support expansion of the King County SWD
GreenTools Roundtable program to include every other-month forums on
climate-related sustainability issues. The Roundtables will be held at various
venues throughout King County and topics will focus on the collaborative
actions related to outreach, coordination, solutions, funding and resources.
Speakers will include King County and City staff and other invited partners.
3.3 Hire a staff member, partial staff member, or consultant to support achieving
the priorities identified in the Climate Pledge (Budget $9,000-$80,000
depending on commitments made).
(a)The staff member will help lead implementation of the Climate
Collaboration initiatives, including but not limited to: sustainable
transportation; clean fuel vehicles; community energy retrofits;
renewable energy projects; community outreach; and other topics
defined and agreed upon in the final Scope of Work or annual Work
Plans. Staff could develop and implement a general countywide
program that supports City sustainability projects or programs. Staffing
options include hiring a part- to full-time staff from King County or a
participating King County City to lead the effort.
(b)Products that will be developed, to be clarified in the process of
finalizing the Scope of Work, and dependent on funding, include:
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 36 of 395
Page 4
1.Directory of local climate solutions related resources to include:
a.County technical expert pool. A list of relevant County
technical experts on staff that already support city
sustainability projects and programs. This could be
expanded with mechanisms for cities to directly contract
with County staff to support implementation of specific
projects and programs.
b.Technical experts from all participating jurisdictions that
could help support other cities’ efforts, share information
and insight, or potentially be contracted out to work with
other cities.
c.Technical experts from academia, research institutions,
utilities and other organizations.
d.List of consultants with local experience and expertise
on a diverse range of climate and sustainability related
functions.
e.Best practices and lessons learned from relevant local
projects and programs.
2.Symposium for city and County staff focused on local climate
solutions.
3.Forum for all local technical experts – a broader group than
those engaged in the Climate Collaboration – to share
information and best practices.
4.Opportunities for local governments to increase understanding
and gather information on specific climate change mitigation
efforts.
5.Other products as defined and agreed upon in the process of
finalizing the Scope of Work, provided they are consistent with
the Climate Pledge and focused on sustainability and climate
change related outreach, coordination, solutions, or funding and
resources.
4. Funding
4.1 The minimum required financial contribution for each City to participate in
this Agreement is shown below. In no event shall the Cities be responsible for amounts
incurred by King County in excess of what is set forth in this Agreement without an
amendment according to the terms hereof.
4.2 To the extent this Agreement is renewed annually, the Parties shall update the
work plan and contribute funds to for this Agreement for estimated costs, as described
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 37 of 395
Page 5
below, in advance of services provided. Any funds not used in any given year will be
used in the execution of the following year’s Work Plan or refunded, on a proportional
basis based on initial contributions, within forty-five (45) days in the event of a Party’s
termination of this Agreement.
4.3 The Parties represent that funds for service provision under this Agreement
have been appropriated and are available. To the extent that such service provision
requires future appropriations beyond current appropriation authority, the obligations of
each Party are contingent upon the appropriation of funds by that Party's legislative
authority to complete the activities described herein. If no such appropriation is made,
the Agreement shall terminate as to that Party provided the Party provides notice of
termination prior to the other parties prior to the adoption of the annual work plan
consistent with Section 2.6.
5. Duration
This Agreement is effective upon execution by King County and a minimum of eight
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 38 of 395
Page 6
Cities which will contribute at least $9,000 total, after approval by the legislative body
of each Party. The Agreement will be posted on the web site of each Party after
authorization in accordance with RCW 39.34.040. and 39.34.200. The Agreement
will have a term of one year and will automatically renew each year unless terminated
as provided in Section 7.
Specific to the City of Renton and duration, the Agreement will not be automatically
renewed and the Agreement will have a term of one-year and will need to be approved
each consecutive year.
6. Latecomers
Non-party cities may opt into this Agreement at any time. If cities join after an annual
work is finalized, they will pay a pro-rated amount, calculated as the preceding year’s
annual financial contribution for that jurisdiction multiplied by the percentage of the
remaining time in the year.
7.Termination
7.1 In addition to termination for lack of appropriation, or due to the lapse of the
Agreement under Section 5, a Party may end its participation in this
Agreement upon written notice to the other Parties prior to October 1st to be
effective at the end of the calendar year. Except as set forth in 7.2, no refunds
will be paid to individual Parties who terminate.
7.2 In the event of individual terminations that result in fewer than eight remaining
City participants, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and all funding
remaining after all services, fees and costs incurred to that date are paid, shall
be returned to the remaining participants pro rata based on their original
relative contribution amounts. Such payment shall be made within forty-five
(45) days of the termination date.
8.Communications
The following persons shall be the contact person for all communications regarding
the performance of this Agreement.
King County City of
Matt Kuharic
King County Department of Natural
Resources and Parks Director’s Office
201 South Jackson, Suite 701, Seattle,
WA 98104
Phone: 206-296-8738 Phone:
E-mail address:Email address:
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 39 of 395
Page 7
matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov
9.Indemnification
To the extent permitted by state law, and for the limited purposes set forth in this
Agreement, each Party shall protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the other
Parties to include the officers, employees, agents and contractors of the Party, while
acting within the scope of their employment as such, from and against any and all
claims (including demands, suits, penalties, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses, or
losses of any kind or nature whatsoever) arising out of or in any way resulting from
such Party’s own negligent acts or omissions, torts and wrongful or illegal acts related
to such Party’s participation and obligations under this Agreement. Each Party agrees
that its obligations under this subsection extend to any claim, demand and/or cause of
action brought by or on behalf of any of its employees or agents. For this purpose,
each Party, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, with respect to the other Parties
only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the
industrial insurance act provisions of Title 51 RCW. The provisions of this subsection
shall survive and continue to be applicable to Parties exercising the right of
termination pursuant to this Agreement.
In no event do the Parties intend to assume any responsibility, risk or liability of any
other Party or otherwise with regard to any Party’s duties or regulations.
10.Compliance with All Laws and Regulations
The Parties shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations
and standards necessary for the performance of this Agreement.
11.Non- exclusive Program
Nothing herein shall preclude any Party from choosing or agreeing to fund or
implement any work, activities or projects associated with any of the purposes
hereunder by separate agreement or action.
12. No Third-Party Rights
Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall it be construed to, create
any rights in any third-party, or to form the basis for any liability on the part of any
Party , or their officers, elected officials, agents and employees, to any third-party.
13.Amendments
This Agreement may be amended, altered or clarified only the unanimous consent of
the Parties represented by affirmative action of their legislative bodies.
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 40 of 395
Page 8
14. Entire Agreement
This Agreement is a complete expression of the intent of the Parties and any oral or
written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded.
15. Waiver
Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default.
Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a
waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a
modification of the terms of the Agreement unless stated to be such through written
approval by the Parties which shall be attached to the original Agreement.
16. RCW 39.34 Required Clauses
a)Purpose. See Section 1 above
b)Duration. See Section 5 above.
c)Organization of separate entity and its powers. No new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
d)Responsibilities of the Parties. See provisions above.
e)Agreement to be filed and recorded. The City shall file this Agreement with its
City Clerk. The County shall place this Agreement on its web site. The Agreement
shall also be recorded.
f)Financing. Each Party shall be responsible for the financing of its contractual
obligations under its normal budgetary process.
g)Termination. See Section 7 above.
17.Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
The persons signing below, who warrant they have the authority to execute this
Agreement.
By: By:
Dow Constantine
King County Executive
Date: ___________________________
Mayor
City of
Date: _________________________
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 41 of 395
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 42 of 395
8c. ‐ Communtiy and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of an interlocal agreement with King County to allow Renton to
Page 43 of 395
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
Meeting:
Regular Council - 17 Oct 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Draft Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Leslie Betlach, Ext. 6619
Recommended Action:
Council concur to set public hearing for November
7, 2011
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In September 2010, the City entered into a consultant contract with MIG, out of Portland Oregon, to
update the City's adopted 2003 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Implementation Plan. The City
updates this plan approximately every six years in order to keep abreast of the current demand and
need for recreation facilities and services based upon population, demographics, trends, and
participation rates. This plan is the guiding document for future programming, acquisition, expansion,
and development. The October 2011 Draft Plan, once adopted, will be submitted for state certification
with the Recreation and Conservation Office. Upon certification, the City will be eligible for six years
for state grant funding opportunities. In addition to fulfilling standard plan components, this update
includes new elements such as recreation programming and natural areas. These additions, as well as
others, provide greater flexibility and increased opportunities to secure grants and other funding.
The fourteen month planning process included numerous opportunities for the public to participate as
well as multiple communication methods. In all, over 1,500 people participated. The city provided the
additional opportunity for the public to review and comment on the September 2011 Draft Plan utilizing
on-line comment forms uploaded onto the project website. In addition, hard copies of the plan and
comment cards were distributed to the Downtown and Highlands libraries and City Hall. The City also
completed the SEPA process, issuing a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). Comments received
have been addressed in the Draft October 2011 Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan which has
been posted on the project website at http://www.rentonparksplan.org/.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Consider adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Plan and and set a public hearing for
November 7, 2011.
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 44 of 395
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:October 4, 2011
TO:Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director,
Ext. 6619
SUBJECT:Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
ISSUE:
Should the Council adopt the October 2011 Draft Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan?
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan and set a public hearing for
November 7, 2011.
BACKGROUND:
In September 2010, the City entered into a consultant contract with MIG, out of Portland
Oregon to update the City’s adopted 2003 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Implementation
Plan. The City updates this Plan approximately every six years in order to keep abreast of the
current demand and need for recreation facilities and services based upon population,
demographics, trends, and participation rates. This plan is the guiding document for future
programming, acquisition, expansion, and development. Previous plans were completed and
adopted by Council in 1978, 1984, and 1993. Adopted plans are submitted to the Washington
State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for certification. Upon certification, the City will
be eligible for six years for state grant funding opportunities; the City uses this plan to apply for
other grant funding as well.
The Plan update was jointly led by the Community Services Department - Parks Planning and
Natural Resources Division and the Community and Economic Development Department -
Planning Section. The fourteen month process included numerous opportunities for the public
to participate and utilized multiple communication methods. Community involvement included
the following:
·Four Community Workshops and one Visioning Workshop geographically located
throughout the City
·Statistically valid random household telephone survey (cell phone and land line)
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 45 of 395
Parks, Recreation and Naturals Areas Plan
Page 2 of 3
October 4, 2011
H/PARKS/Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director/Planning/Parks, Rec & Open Space Plan/MIG 2010/Legislative
Interactive project web site including a full library of all documents, on-line
questionnaire and interactive map
·Two Community Liaison meetings and one Refugee Forum meeting
·Five Inter-Departmental Team meetings
·Four Steering Committee meetings (Steering Committee represented the larger
community including the environment, school district, businesses, active recreation,
trails, youth, seniors, and the arts with gender, age, and ethnic diversity)
·Two joint Parks Commission and Planning Commission meetings and several separate
commission meetings
·Five Stakeholder meetings representing Herons Forever, the Boeing Company, the
Renton School District, RUFF (Renton’s Unleashed Furry Friends), and skate park
advocates
·Three Focus Group meetings (Environmental, Recreation Service Providers and Outdoor
Active Recreation)
·One kick-off and three Committee of the Whole briefings
A variety of communication methods were utilized for public outreach including the interactive
Project website, City website, Facebook, e-mail blasts utilizing the Recreation “Class”
registration database, neighborhood program, community liaisons, e-grapevine, Patch, Renton
Reporter, “What’s Happening” brochure, and Channel 21.
In all, over 1,500 people actively participated.
In addition to coordinating with other adopted plans such a the adopted Trails and Bicycle
Master Plan and fulfilling standard plan components for existing conditions, planning context,
needs analysis, statistically valid survey, prioritized list of capital projects, and identifying
potential funding sources, this update includes the following new key elements:
·Natural resources section to be eligible for expanded grant funding opportunities
·GIS mapping to identify green infra-structure by mapping the City’s entire public land
base exclusive of ownership and management authority, thereby increasing the
potential for public access to green spaces
·Recreation program needs assessment evaluating recreation programs for service gaps,
efficiencies, and potential partnership opportunities
·Decision Making Tools to evaluate and prioritize programs and projects
·Park and facility design guidelines
·Cost assumptions for maintenance
·5, 10 and 20 years capital cost projections
CONCLUSION:
This plan is the guiding document for future programming, acquisition, expansion, and
development and looks out six years in the short term and twenty years overall. In addition to
the public participation process utilized in plan development, the public had the opportunity to
comment on the September 2011 Draft Plan on-line or submit paper copy comments. This plan
was posted to the Project website as well as printed copies located at the Downtown and
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 46 of 395
Parks, Recreation and Naturals Areas Plan
Page 3 of 3
October 4, 2011
H/PARKS/Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director/Planning/Parks, Rec & Open Space Plan/MIG 2010/Legislative
Highlands libraries and City Hall. All comments have been addressed in the October 2011 Draft
Plan. Adoption of this Plan will move the City forward in providing relevant parks, recreation
and natural area opportunities and provide greater flexibility and increased opportunities to
secure grants and other funding.
cc:Denis Law, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Iwen Wang, Finance and Information Services Administrator
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Alex Pietsch, Community and Economic Development Administrator
Chip Vincent, Planning Director
Vanessa Dolbee, Sr. Planner
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 47 of 395
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 48 of 395
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 49 of 395
8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends setting a public
hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider adopting the Parks, Recreation, and Page 50 of 395
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2011/2012 Mid-biennium Budget Amendment
Meeting:
Regular Council - 17 Oct 2011
Exhibits:
Budget Meeting Calendar
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Finance & Information Technology
Staff Contact:
Iwen Wang, Administrator
Recommended Action:
Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public
hearing on 11/7/2011
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In compliance with RCW 35A.34, the proposed 2011/2012 Mid-biennium Budget Amendment will be
submitted to the City Council and City Clerk on October 24, 2011. This agenda bill sets the time and
place for a public hearing on November 7, 2011.
The following legislations will be presented in November as part of the public hearing process:
1. 2012 Property Tax levy
2. Mid-biennium budget adjustment
3. Fee Schedule (housekeeping language change only, no change in fees)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set public hearing date of November 7, 2011, to consider the proposed 2012 Property Tax Levy and
proposed 2012 Mid-biennium Budget Adjustment, with potential adoption of the ordinances by
November 28, 2011.
8e. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department
recommends setting a public hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider the
Page 51 of 395
CITY OF RENTON
PRELIMINARY
2011/2012 MID-BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT
CALENDAR
Unless otherwise specified, all meetings will be held at City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, Washington
98057.
October 24, 2011 - Committee of the Whole – 5:00 p.m.
Council budget workshop
§Proposed Mid-Year Adjustments
§Proposed Property Tax Levy
§Fee adjustments, if applicable
November 7, 2011 - Committee of the Whole – 5:00 p.m.
Council budget workshop
§Deliberation
§Draft Committee Report
November 7, 2011 - Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m.
Public Hearing:
§2012 Property Tax Levy
§Mid-biennium budget adjustment
November 14 , 2011 - Committee of the Whole – 5:00 p.m.
Council budget workshop
§Deliberation
§Final Committee Report
November 14 , 2011 - Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m.
Ordinance First Reading
November 28, 2011 - Regular Council Meeting – 7:00 p.m.
Ordinance Final Reading/Adoption
Fee Schedule Resolution, if applicable
8e. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department
recommends setting a public hearing on 11/7/2011 to consider the
Page 52 of 395
10a. ‐ Climate collaboration interlocal agreement with King County (See
8.c.)Page 53 of 395
10a. ‐ Climate collaboration interlocal agreement with King County (See
8.c.)Page 54 of 395
10a. ‐ Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)Page 55 of 395
10a. ‐ Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)Page 56 of 395
10a. ‐ Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)Page 57 of 395
10a. ‐ Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)Page 58 of 395
10a. ‐ Approving the Gaile Annexation (1st reading 10/10/2011)Page 59 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 60 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 61 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 62 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 63 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 64 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 65 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 66 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 67 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 68 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 69 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 70 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 71 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 72 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 73 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 74 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 75 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 76 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 77 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 78 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 79 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 80 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 81 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 82 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 83 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 84 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 85 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 86 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 87 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 88 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 89 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 90 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 91 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 92 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 93 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 94 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 95 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 96 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 97 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 98 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 99 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 100 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 101 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 102 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 103 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 104 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 105 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 106 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 107 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 108 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 109 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 110 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 111 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 112 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 113 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 114 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 115 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 116 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 117 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 118 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 119 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 120 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 121 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 122 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 123 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 124 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 125 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 126 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 127 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 128 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 129 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 130 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 131 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 132 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 133 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 134 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 135 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 136 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 137 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 138 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 139 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 140 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 141 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 142 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 143 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 144 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 145 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 146 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 147 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 148 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 149 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 150 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 151 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 152 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 153 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 154 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 155 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 156 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 157 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 158 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 159 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 160 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 161 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 162 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 163 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 164 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 165 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 166 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 167 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 168 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 169 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 170 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 171 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 172 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 173 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 174 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 175 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 176 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 177 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 178 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 179 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 180 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 181 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 182 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 183 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 184 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 185 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 186 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 187 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 188 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 189 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 190 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 191 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 192 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 193 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 194 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 195 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 196 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 197 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 198 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 199 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 200 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 201 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 202 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 203 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 204 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 205 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 206 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 207 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 208 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 209 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 210 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 211 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 212 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 213 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 214 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 215 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 216 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 217 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 218 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 219 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 220 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 221 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 222 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 223 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 224 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 225 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 226 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 227 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 228 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 229 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 230 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 231 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 232 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 233 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 234 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 235 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 236 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 237 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 238 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 239 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 240 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 241 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 242 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 243 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 244 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 245 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 246 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 247 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 248 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 249 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 250 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 251 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 252 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 253 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 254 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 255 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 256 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 257 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 258 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 259 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 260 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 261 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 262 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 263 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 264 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 265 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 266 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 267 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 268 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 269 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 270 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 271 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 272 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 273 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 274 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 275 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 276 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 277 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 278 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 279 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 280 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 281 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 282 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 283 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 284 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 285 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 286 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 287 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 288 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 289 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 290 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 291 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 292 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 293 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 294 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 295 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 296 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 297 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 298 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 299 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 300 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 301 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 302 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 303 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 304 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 305 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 306 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 307 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 308 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 309 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 310 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 311 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 312 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 313 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 314 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 315 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 316 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 317 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 318 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 319 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 320 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 321 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 322 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 323 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 324 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 325 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 326 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 327 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 328 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 329 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 330 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 331 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 332 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 333 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 334 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 335 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 336 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 337 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 338 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 339 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 340 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 341 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 342 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 343 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 344 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 345 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 346 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 347 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 348 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 349 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 350 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 351 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 352 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 353 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 354 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 355 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 356 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 357 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 358 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 359 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 360 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 361 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 362 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 363 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 364 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 365 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 366 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 367 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 368 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 369 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 370 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 371 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 372 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 373 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 374 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 375 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 376 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 377 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 378 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 379 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 380 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 381 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 382 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 383 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 384 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 385 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 386 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 387 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 388 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 389 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 390 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 391 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 392 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 393 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 394 of 395
10b. ‐ Shoreline Master Program Final Adoption (1st reading
10/10/2011)Page 395 of 395