HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract � '4
,f
' CAG-15-213
KITSAP COUNTY
' DEPT. OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
911 Carver Street
Bremerton, WA 98312
(360) 307-5871
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE LIDAR DATA
KING COUNTY, WA. LIDAR PROJECT
BY PARTNERS LISTED IN EXHIBIT A
KC- -2015
THIS AGREEMENT is between Multiple Partners(Exhibit A)all municipal corporations,and Kitsap County,a
municipal corporation,all in the State of Washington.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,The Interlocal Cooperation Act,as amended and codified in Chapter 3934 RCW provides for
Interlocal cooperation between governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS,Chapter 39.33 of the Revised Code of Washington provides far the intergovernmental disposition of
property, and
WHEREAS,both parties are required to make certain purchases by formal advertisement and bid process,which is a
time consuming and expensive process; and it is in the public interest to cooperate in the combination of bidding
requirements to obtain the most favorable bid for each party where it is in their mutual interest;and
WHEREAS,the parties also wish to utilize each other's contracts where it is in their mutual interest;
NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this agreement is to acknowledge the parties'mutual interest to jointly bid the
acquisition of goods and services and disposition of property where such mutual effort can be planned in advance
and to authorize the acquisition of goods and services and the purchase or acquisition of goods and services under
contracts where a price is extended by either party's bidder to other governmental agencies;
2. ADMINISTRATION.No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provision of
this agreement. The Administrator of this agreement is the Director of Emergency Management of Kitsap County,
Washington.
3. SCOPE.This agreement shall allow the following activities:
A. Purchase or acquisition of goods and services by each party acting as agent for either or both parties
when agreed to in advance,in writing;
B. Purchase or acquisition of goods and services by each party where provision has been provided in
contracts for other agencies to avail themselves of goods and services offered under the contract.
C. Disposal of goods by each party acting as agent far either,or both parties when agreed to in advance, in
writing.
1
, �
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
4. DURATION OF AGREEMENT-TERMINATION. This agreement shall become effective upon signature of
both parties for a one(1)year period.
5. RIGHT TO CONTRACT INDEPENDENT ACTION PRESERVED. Each party reserves the right to contract
independently far the acquisition of goods or services and or disposal of any property without notice to the other
party and shall not bind or otherwise obligate the other party to participate in the activity.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REOUIREMENTS. Each party accepts responsibility for compliance with
federal,state or local laws and regulations including,in particular,bidding requirements applicable to its acquisition
of goods and services or disposal of property.
7. FINANCING.The method of financing of payment shall be through budgeted funds or other available funds of
the party for whose use the property is actually acquired or disposed. Each party accepts no responsibility for the
payment of the acquisition price of any goods or services intended for use by the other party.
8. FILING. Executed copies of this agreement shall be filed as required by Section 39.34.040 RCW priar to this
agreement becoming effective.
9. INTERLOCAL COOPERATION DISCLOSURE. Each party may insert in its solicitations for goods a
provision disclosing that other authorized government agencies may also wish to procure the goods being offered to
the party and allowing the bidder the option of extending its bid to other agencies at the same bid price,terms and
conditions.
10. NON-DELEGATION/NON-ASSIGNMENT.Neither party may delegate the performance of any contractual
obligation,to a third party,unless mutually agreed in writing.Neither party may assign this agreement without the
written consent of the other party.
11. HOLD HARMLESS.Each party shall be liable and responsible for the consequences of any negligent ar
wrongful act or failure to act on the part of itself and its employees.Neither party assumes responsibility to the other
party for the consequences of any act or admission of any person,firm or corparation not a party to this agreement.
12. SEVERABILITY.Any provision of this agreement,which is prohibited or unenforceable,shall be ineffective
to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability,without invalidating the remaining provision or affecting the
validity or enforcement of such provision.
13. LiDAR SURVEY DATA.Kitsap County has contracted with Quantum Spatial Inc. to provide public-domain
high-resolution LiDAR topographic survey data in the Pacific Northwest. Exhibit C outlines costs associated with
Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium's rate structure agreed upon with Quantum Spatial,Inc.under its contract terms
and used in Exhibit B to define Quantum Spatial,Inc.project proposal.The proposal and cost structure is the basis
of the King County LiDAR Project partnership to purchase LiDAR Data.
The jurisdictions or municipal partners in Exhibit A agree to participate in the King County LiDAR Project and to
the costs outlined in the Exhibit. Kitsap County will act as the agent for each partner in Exhibit A and a signatory to
this agreement to obtain the data described in Exhibit B from Quantum Spatial,Inc. The project,referred to as the
King County LiDAR Project has a total costs of$623,146.00. The Project Costs is a total of LiDAR services and a
service fee for contract administration and Quality Assurance,which is 14%of the total Project costs.This
Agreement is for a total cost of$95,585.00 to include associated administrative and quality assurance cost noted in
Exhibit A. Each LiDAR Partner listed in Exhibit A will be responsible for their obligated LiDAR costs and
payments will be made per contract milestones as follows: (1)acquisition(50%of total costs),(2)delivery(30%of
total costs)and acceptance(20%of total costs).
2
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
Accepted and Approved: Accepted:
Kitsap County Department of Emergency Management
Kitsap County,Washington
CTTY OF AUBURN
.'
By:
ichael Gordon, Director
Title: Kitsap County Emergency Management
Date:
�-?j�'L�i /�
Attest: Date
sy:
CITY OF BELLEVUE Approved DATED this�_day of 1(1 �
,2016
By:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Title: KITSAP COUNTY,WASHINGTON
rf� , i%:
Date: � .���4""il �' i, /
` ,,�,
Attest:
gy; EDWARD E.WOLFE,Chair
CITY OF BOTHELL ���-'
gy; CHARLOTTE GARRIDO,Commissioner
Title:
0
Date•
ROBERT GELDER, ommissioner
Attest:
sy:
CEDAR RIVER WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT ATT T: �
By:
I !
Title: Clerk of the Board
_,,, �'�,v�'L'I/(,���-:
Date• - � •• ' •. ts
>
,1'O:•�'�PTE �,,�:cS'yo.
Attest: ��: �
sy: .,�. •m�,
,�o� �` `�
-�;��:�� o?•��
� ���y��G'�.•• �
3 �p �o��� �
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
CITY OF ISSAQUAH CITY OF SAMMAMISH
By: By:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Attest: Attest:
By: By:
CITY OF KENT CITY OF SEATTLE
By: By:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Attest: Attest:
By: By:
NORTHSHORE UTILITIES CITY OF KIRKLAND
By: By:
Title• Title•
Date: Date:
Attest: Attest:
By: By:
CITY OF TON
By. \�\�\,��`1�qtIINIIlU1111�/���i,/,
. �`�� � RE ToZ��''%
T�tle: Ma or Denis Law � � %
� �
I o 6 s' _� SEA *_
Date: � _
_ _
� � �' � �
BAy est: ` yi�//// �S�6\a��\�
Jason . Set City Cl �Aam�����'�����\\\
4
Exhibit A
King County LiDAR Project Partners and Contract Costs
TOTAL: � TOTAL:King Total City/Agency
Sq Mi Equivalent Partner:QSI Partner:Admin Partner:QA Cost
King County Lidar Partner City/Agency ;County Shared and King County
Assigned Area Acres Acquisition Cost Cost 796 7%
Cost Coat Shared Cost
Aubum 50.67 32430.76 $12,648.00 $885.36 $885.36 $14,418.72; $13,735.27 $28,153.99
Bellevue 50.29 32184.90 $12,552.11 $878.65 $878.65 514,309.41; 513,631.14 $27,940.55
Bothell 20.48 13108.92 $5,112.48 $357.87 $357.87 $5,828.22; $5,551.97 $11,380.19
Cedar River Water and Sewer District 21.56 13798.65 $5,381.47 $376J0 $376J0 $6,134.88; $5,844.09 $11,978.97
Issaquah 18.08 11571.01 $4,512.69 $315.89 $315.89 $5,144.47; $4,900.62 $10,045.09
Kent 51.59 33020.58 $12,878.02 $901.46 $901.46 $14,680.95; $13,985.07 $28,666.02
Kirkland 26.73 17108.41 $6,672.28 $467.06 $467.06 $7,6D6.40; $7,245.86 $14,852.26
Northshore Utility District 27.77 17769.70 $6,930.18 $485.11 $485.11 57,900.41; $7,525.93 $15,426.34
Renton 35.17 22509.62 $8,778.75 $614.51 $614.51 $10,007.78; $9,533.41 $19,541.19
Sammamish 33.58 21488.24 $8,380.41 $586.63 $586.63 $9,553.67; $9,100.83 $18,654.50
Toql� $334.94 $21�4.990.79 $83.845.39 $5,869.24 $5,869.24 $95,�4.91; $91,054.19 $186.639.10
NOTE: King County has agreed, under a separate agreement, to pay a proportionate cost for the project as outlined in the Table above.
5
1
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
Exhibit B
LiDAR Data Acquisition Cost Proposal—King County LiDAR Project
September 9, 2015
Michael Gordon
Kitsap County Department of Emergency Management
911 Carver St
Bremerton,WA 98312
360-307-5872
mgordon@co.kitsap.wa.us
RE: LiDAR Data Acquisition Cost Proposal—King County 2015 Project Area,WA
Quantum Spatial, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to present to the Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium (PSLC) a cost
proposal for acquiring and processing high-resolution(>8 pulses/mz)LiDAR data for the project area of interest to King
County, WA. Our cost for LiDAR acquisition and processing abides by our negotiated cost structure with the PSLC,
assuming that a contract for
standard deliverables will be
administered through Kitsap __..,:�, ' ; : -.
County, WA. ,y,�+,._ � � �,`� � , � ��y}r-�� r!f #
�-� :.R � „X�;� x�"`7.�,# �'e��;;. '��r ��<<
"� ��' �'�'" . ��rlk^'.- �Y r�� � �� �.�f� �
. ,
� _ i� - `
f`` r: , � � ='�""r.w. a.�,��.�, a �� .�� �
. y � „, �
, r-� � ` � � � '; ��
LiDAR point doud colored by NA/P {�, - �� � �' �'�' �� �` -> ��"�
arE�:-tt�.�,.4��� `� a �„
imagery of downtown Redmond, �* � ,�,�'' � � „�.;;c � - °
Washington. + `� .��'�z ,�,,:�� � '" a= <-- ,d:
�
�
-. � �y r� a_� � ° �
'v � . 6G" !�. .
� ��
�e.- � <+.��
�� ' ,�;�_,, '�
+��,r�� -'�_' � "" ;�,,, �.� ,,�,�;a
' �' �" m e
. �
� -
,"'�"�9 .. "'"v�`�'` _ .. . # �� �a^'_�='�1E, ��,�"�"•"��
, .e'' "1... ..
y� ��� � �
� � � .
Services � "�� � � ��� ,,� �
� �"�."�` �� , � �
Airborne LiDAR , ' �' '
.. �� ;, ,,�
QSI will collect LiDAR data using a Leica LiDAR system to produce a highly accurate, high resolution (>8 pulses/mz)
LiDAR dataset with no gaps and ample buffers(at least 100m)around project boundaries.Data will be collected at a<_
30°field of view(+/-15°from nadir),with at least 50%overlap among swaths to minimize gaps and laser shadowing.
The LiDAR system records up to four range measurements (returns) per pulse (first, second, third, and last). All
overlapping flight lines will be flown in opposing directions to maximize detection of swath to swath inconsistencies
used to resolve system misalignments. Our GPS receivers and LiDAR systems are GNSS-capable ensuring low PDOP
values and adequate satellite constellations throughout the mission. GPS quality is predicted before the flight and
checked during post processing to ensure that positional accuracy exceeds specifications.
Using a combination of automated and manual techniques that are tailored to the particular land cover and terrain
of the study area, LiDAR processing will include kinematic corrections, calculation of laser point position, relative
accuracy testing and calibrations,classification of ground and non-ground points, assessments of statistical
absolute accuracy, and creation of ground surface models.
6
, 1
Absolute accuracy assessments will compare known RTK ground survey points to derived LiDAR points.Accuracies are
• � • .- . . .
described as the mean and standard deviation
(sigma�a)of divergence from RTK ground survey
Multi-Swath Pulse Density >_8 pulses/m� point coordinates.All accuracy statistics(RMSEZ,
Scan Angle <_30°(+/-15°from Nadir) AccuracYz - 1.966, skewness/distribution, and
Returns Collected Per Laser Pulse Up to 4 percentile deviations) will be reported in the
Intensity Range 1-255 final report. Statements of statistical accuracy
Swath Overlap 50%side-lap(100%overlap)
will apply to fixed terrestrial surfaces only.
GPS PDOP During Acquisition <_3.0
GPS Satellite Constellation >_6
Maximum GPS Baseline 13 nautical miles
Accuracy=(1.96 6),slope<20° <20 cm
Vertical Accurecy(6),slope<20° <_15 cm Survey Control
Horizontal Accuracy(6) <_30 cm Simultaneous to the LiDAR data collection
mission,QSI will conduct a static(1 Hz recording frequency)survey of the horizontal and vertical positions of two or
more survey control dual-frequency DGPS base stations established at monuments with known coordinates. Maximum
baseline lengths between control points and the aircraft GPS do not exceed 24 kilometers(13 nautical miles).After the
static GPS data have been collected, the files will be processed using the Online Positioning User Service (OPUS).
Multiple sessions will be processed over the same monument to confirm antenna height measurements and reported
OPUS position accuracy.Control monument locations will be certified by a Q51 Washington PLS.
Quality control real-time kinematic(RTK)ground check survey data will be collected within the project area,with an
established Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of less than 2 cm. Absolute laser spot accuracies will be statistically
analyzed based upon an adequate sample(500 per 50,000 acres,depending on access and GPS conditions within study
area)of well-distributed RTK ground survey points on open, bare earth surfaces with level slope.
. _ _ _
�, M�.; _ _
. � y � ---�
� �,
�� �
��„9sF, �s.
.h�. ..
_ ._ , . . ,.� �-�:�;� _ ._um.�...�_
-- ..,,,� _ ,
_; � __
P�� �.��
. .
� ..- „ .
� ���,
7
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
Deliverables
Deliverables will match standard for Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium:
� , .
Report of Survey Text report that describes survey methods;results;vendor's accuracy assessments,
including internal consistency and absolute accuracy;and metadata
.pdf,.doc,or.odt format
Aircraft trajectories Aircraft position(easting,northing,elevation)and attitude(heading,pitch,roll)and GPS
(SBET files) time recorded at regular intervals of 1 second or less.May include additional attributes.
ASCII text format
All-return point cloud List of all valid returns.For each return:GPS week,GPS second,easting,northing,
elevation,intensity,return#,return classification.May include additional attributes.No
duplicate entries.
ASCII text and LAS version 1.2 format
1/100`h USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle(0.75 minute by 0.75 minuteJ tiles
Ground point list List of X,Y,Z coordinates of all identified ground points.
ASCII text.
1/100`h USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle(0.75 minute by 0. 75 minute)tiles
Ground surface model Raster of ground surface,interpolated via triangulated irregular network from identified
ground points.No unavoidable point misclassification
ESRI floating point grid,3 ft cell size,snapped to(O,OJ,1/4`�USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle
(3.75 minute by 3.75 minuteJ tiles
First-return(highest-hit) Raster of first-return surface,cell heights are highest recorded value within that cell,
i surface model voids may be filled with ground surface model
I ESR/floating point grid, 3 ft cell size,snapped to(0,0J,1/4`h USGS 7.5-minute
quadranqle(3.75 minute by 3.75 minuteJ tiles
Intensity image GeoTIFF,1.5.ft pixel size,1/4`h USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle(3.75 minute by 3.75
' minute)tiles
Files shall conform to a consistent naming scheme.Files shall have consistent internal formats.Surface models shall li
have no tiling artifacts and no gaps at tile boundaries.Areas outside survey boundary shall be coded as NoData. '
Internol voids(e.g.,open water areas,shadowed areas in first-return surfaceJ may be coded as NoData. J
�--- —_
..
Projection Washington State Plane North
Horizontal Datum NAD83(CORS96)
Vertical Datum NAVD88(GEOID03) �'`�
Units U.S.Survey Feet
Delineations USGS Quadrangle tiling scheme
*To match with existing data. The data will be created in NAD83(CORS96J,
but for GIS purposes will be defined as NAD83(HARN).
8
�
, .
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
Area of Interest—King County, WA
The area of interest(AOI)for this cost proposal includes 700,329 acres spread through King County,WA(Figure 1).
Previous LiDAR collections for the PSLC and Pierce County are shown in grey.Overlap between collections will facilitate
data matching. The AOI will be buffered by 100 meters to ensure complete coverage and adequate point densities
around study area boundaries.
� ��°` �.�� p ��, _� � ^�� " >��� Figure 1. Area of
.�
� ��a ���n� " � ��"� � � �,�,F�� interest for LiDAR
�,
�,�.� „ acquisition in King
� � � "` ;� �`�� County, WA.
� �"iz� _ ,. .t'� s :�k'.".'��t ,�? �
Y w+�► .� ��> � ;� M .~" �� �
� .
w ` °- 5��e �� F�� ,
"1� ' ,r ,r �. �� � ��� �:
� r 4
��,��. t �' �; ���,•�, 'x•� .�� �' ,,,�'��.
..� � � '3 r� �r,, $. `"°' * y,),�,.�':
�,a�
, �i' � �.�".+M � r. '� i af
�
dk����":. „ vh�^ �fiv-.
, � � ' � . , �tC
� �` '�'� �� ��st�' .u�.t�ry j( ,�Aw�
j. .;� S" �.�.� dr+'�,9�k^ `'§:�Ak r.���` ...�.
�� �y .'�
� .N. 1w ��y�
i
��i� < . . .� ��� . . �u�.
y, "
�
�... � � �,.r � �
, �
. F, s�,� � �` : "Survey
� "'- �";^G � ��� — Locatton
� ',r". a� ..rm�,.,, r r�,�".
A�36�:% � c ';, ,,,y `,
t�`� `w'°v ,�� ,��M1 s
< � '-'s
$:-' �* ., y.;
` �� . i'"�.�''" -...au�il
*�'�'" � "�Kin Coun Re ional LiDAR �
�_'r , 9 tY 9
�� � � � ��2015 Project Boundary(700,329 acres) �
Previously Collected LiDAR(QSIlWSI)
5 10 20
Mi�es
Schedule
QSI will work with PSLC and King County to coordinate timing of data collection during fall 2015 as best meets the
needs of the project. All data are delivered to PSLC within 60 days of acquisition.
Cost Proposal
The following table presents LiDAR acquisition and processing costs for the project area portrayed in Figure 1,
assuming above specifications and deliverables. Costs for acquisition and base level processing are in
accordance with QSI's negotiated area-weighted rate structure with the Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium.
. . � � i i� � .
.
LiDAR Acquisition and Base Processing $546,256.62 $0.78
* Budget does not include 14%PSLC administrative fee.
9
j
, .
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
Exhibit C
Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium Rate Structure �
Provider: Kitsap County
Agreement No.: KC-244-12 w/extension
Agreement Title: Remote Watershed LiDAR Services
Area Extent Price per Price per Contours Intensity Gain-
Acre Square Mile Images normalized
Intensities
50 to 100 sq. miles $1.42 $909 $0.142 $0 $0.080
(32,000 to 64,000 acres)
100 to150 sq. miles $1.11 $710 $0.111 $0 $0.060
(64,000 to 96,000 acres)
150 to 200 sq. miles $0.94 $602 $0.094 $0 $0.050
(96,000 to 128,000 acres)
200 to 250 sq. miles $0.84 $538 $0.084 $0 $0.040
(szs,000 to 160,00o ac)
Greater than 250 sq. mi $0.78 $499 $0.078 $0 $0.035
(Greater than 160,000 ac)
The Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium (PSLC)adds a 14%overhead fee to the total cost. 7%is for contract and
administrative services by Kitsap County Oepartment of Emergency Management and 7%to the Puget Sound LiDAR
Consortium for Data analysis.
10